HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-18-25 Public Comment - E. Hall - Application 25238 for Lot 2 Sundance SpringsFrom:Ernie Hall
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Cc:Gloria Lindemeier
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Application 25238 for Lot 2 Sundance Springs
Date:Monday, November 17, 2025 4:23:02 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We originally became residents of Sundance Springs in 2004 when we purchased 127 Peace
Pipe Dr. We sold that property in 2008. We purchased 180 Peace Pipe Dr. in 2021 and still
live there today. In both instances, we were aware of all existing covenants and restrictions
and embraced them as protective of our existing and future property values. We are neither
protectionists or anti-growth or anti development. We were confident in what we purchased
and are extremely happy with those decisions. The recent application for Lot 2 Sundance
Springs is not consistent with our understanding of what we bought. We ask that the City and
the Director of Community Development reject this plan entirely. Please let the developer
submit a third application, one that is consistent with the PUD and Master Plan, and I will
staunchly support it. That third application should address the following concerns regarding
the second proposed application:
1.) TOO MANY BUILDINGS AND ACTIVITIY ON TOO SMALL OF A LOT: As noted, Application
#25238 proposes two, two story buildings totaling 10,000 square feet. Those buildings include
a restaurant/bar with over 100 seats for patrons, nearly half of which are outdoors. Such
outdoor seating is forbidden by our Master Plan. The proposal also suggests a 2,500-square-
foot health gym, a 1,200 square foot retail space and a total of 4 second-story office suites in
the two buildings.
2.) ALL OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES ARE NOT ALLOWED: The proposed plan shows extensive
outdoor seating for a restaurant/bar. Even more seasonal seating is possible in the grassy
area adjacent to the proposed patio. This is a direct violation of our Master Plan which states
that there should be no outdoor business allowed
3.) NOT ENOUGH PARKING: The proposed uses include businesses in two large buildings that -
as designed - may at times need 150 or more parking spaces, and yet there are only 51 spaces
provided on site. Our PUD prohibits on-street parking. This proposal creates major safety
issues because our narrow streets will become one-lane alleys, restricting our safe access to
our homes and endangering us all with increased traffic, constricted traffic lanes and poor
access for emergency vehicles.
4.) NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ARE REQUIRED; NOT CITYWIDE DESTINATIONS: The proposal of
two oversized buildings will flood destination traffic into our neighborhood from all over
town. The intention of the Master Plan was just the opposite. The neighborhood commercial
lots at the western entrance to our neighborhood are meant for neighborhood businesses.
5.) TWO BUILDINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED: Our PUD and Master Plan allow only one, single story
building of less than 5,000 square feet. This proposal asks for two, two story buildings totaling
nearly 10,000 square feet. The city should follow our legally binding Master Plan.
6.) PARKING LOTS ABUT THE TRAILS, SETBACKS AND BLOCK FRONTAGE STANDARDS CODES
ARE VIOLATED: The proposed plan gobbles up setback space and damages the character of
our open space. Sundance Springs homeowners own the open space surrounding this
commercial lot. The relevant building code does not allow parking to lap over into the
bordering setbacks that are meant to buffer our open space.
We love our neighborhood. We love where we live. We love what it was intended to be and
everything that it promises to be. Covenants are a wonderful thing.
Jean and Ernie Hall
180 Peace Pipe Dr.
Bozeman, MT 59715
Ernie Hall
Broker/Owner
Big Sky Properties, Inc.
PO Box 160515
Big Sky, MT 59716-0515
cell 406 539 8585
office 406 995 2000