Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-18-25 Public Comment - C. Spencer - Application #25238, Lot 2 Sundance Springs - with correct application # in email bodyFrom:Cathy Gnehm Spencer To:Bozeman Public Comment Subject:[EXTERNAL]Application #25238, Lot 2 Sundance Springs - with correct application # in email body Date:Monday, November 17, 2025 8:47:59 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Erin George, I am writing to you about Site Plan #25238 for Lot 2 Sundance Springs. As someone who has lived in Bozeman for most of my life, and in Sundance Springs for many years, I am invested in the future of our neighborhood. This site plan was previously overturned by the City Commission in 2024 through a 4-1 vote. The current proposal is back and is basically unchanged from the original plan and continues to fail to comply with both the Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the Master Plan. Here are some issues with the site plan · Excessive Buildings and Activity: The proposed plan includes two two-story buildings totaling 10,000 square feet. This level of development is excessive for the size of the lot. · Non-Compliance with PUD and Master Plan: The PUD and Master Plan permit only one single-story building of less than 5,000 square feet. The current proposal does not meet these requirements. · Insufficient Parking: The proposed uses for the site may require more than the 51 parking spaces shown. This shortfall could lead to overflow parking on surrounding streets, which poses safety concerns and violates the PUD. · Misalignment with Master Plan Intent: The original intent of the Master Plan was for the property to serve as neighborhood services, not as a citywide destination. While I support having a neighborhood development on this lot, the current design will likely create more problems than benefits for local residents. As proposed, it risks becoming a neighborhood nuisance rather than an asset. For these reasons, I urge you to reject the application for Site Plan #25238 for Lot 2 Sundance Springs. It is essential that any development on this site fully adheres to the Master Plan and PUD requirements. Thank you Cathy Gnehm Spencer Lot 87 Sundance Springs