Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-13-25 Public Comment - S. Kern - Second Application (#25238) for Lot 2 Sundance SpringsFrom:SYLVIE KERN To:Bozeman Public Comment Subject:[EXTERNAL]Second Application (#25238) for Lot 2 Sundance Springs Date:Thursday, November 13, 2025 11:58:20 AM Attachments:11-13-25 Public comments on site plan 25238.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Please see my attached letter urging you to deny this second application,which continues to violate both the letter and the spirit of the PUD, the Master Plan, and the Covenants and Development Guidelines. Thank you, Sylvie Kern SYLVIE K. KERN 3935 E. Graf St. Bozeman, MT 59715 sylviesadventure1@gmail.com November 13, 2025 Via E-mail Bozeman City Commissioners Members of the Community Development Board Community Development Directors Planning Department Staff RE: Public Comment on Site Plan Application #25238: Sundance Springs Neighborhood Services Lot #2 Development Dear City Commissioners, Members of the Community Development Board, Community Development Directors, and Planning Department Staff: As a resident of Sundance Springs Subdivision, I am strongly opposed to this renewed application for the development of Lot # 2, Sundance Springs Neighborhood Services. The current City of Bozeman Commission must follow the rules and covenants ordered by the 1990’s era City Commission when the PUD was adopted. This second application continues to violate these rules and covenants, in egregious ways. 1. Application No.25238 now proposes TWO, TWO STORY BUILDINGS, totaling 10,000 square feet, including:  A restaurant/bar  A 2,500-square-foot health gym  A 1,200 square foot retail space, and  A total of four, second-story office suites in the two buildings. The PUD and Master Plan allow only ONE, SINGLE STORY BUILDING OF LESS THAN 5,000 SQUARE FEET. In addition, the proposal is entirely incompatible with this residential neighborhood. The intent of the Master Plan was to provide for neighborhood businesses, not a large commercial center drawing residents from the entire town. 2. The proposed restaurant/bar contemplates PROHIBITED OUTDOOR SEATING AND ACTIVITIES with over 100 seats for patrons, nearly half of which are outdoors. Under the Master Plan, no outdoor business is allowed. November 13, 2025 Page two 3. There is NOT ENOUGH PARKING. Where are cars for so much proposed commercial activity supposed to be parked??  Only 51 spaces are provided to accommodate 100 potential restaurant visitors, in addition to gym and office visitors. The PUD prohibits street parking, yet with this development our streets will be transformed into narrow lanes constricting traffic and changing the entire outdoors experience that the residents of this community cherish.  The homeowners own the surrounding open space. The applicable building code does not permit for parking onto spaces intended to buffer the open space. In sum, the renewed application still fundamentally violates the PUD and Master Plan that are legally binding documents. The application should be denied. Thank you for considering my comments. Sincerely, /s/ Sylvie Kern Sylvie Kern