The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPrior Site Plan Submittal_Plan Review Comments_MasterPlan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: 24058 Nelson Meadows Lot 15 SP Workflow Started: 1/24/2024 4:12:41 PM Report Generated: 06/09/2025 10:29 AM REVIEW COMMENTS REF # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 CYCLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REVIEWED BY Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:19 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:19 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:19 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:19 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:27 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:27 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:41 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 11:46 AM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 12:00 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 12:54 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 12:56 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 12:57 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:23 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:27 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:27 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:28 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:50 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:52 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:52 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:56 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 1:58 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 2:05 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 2:05 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 2:05 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 2:42 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 3:08 PM Planning Susana Montana 1/30/24 3:08 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/8/24 2:03 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/9/24 7:56 AM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/9/24 7:56 AM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/9/24 8:15 AM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/9/24 9:58 AM Addressing Jenny Connelley 2/9/24 2:03 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/12/24 11:45 AM Stormwater Division Russ Smith 2/12/24 12:20 PM Stormwater Division Russ Smith 2/12/24 12:22 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/12/24 1:24 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/12/24 1:34 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/12/24 1:58 PM Engineering Mikaela Schultz 2/13/24 3:50 PM Water and Sewer Division Nick Pericich 2/14/24 9:36 AM Water and Sewer Division Nick Pericich 2/14/24 9:40 AM Fire Department Scott Mueller 2/14/24 10:50 AM Fire Department Scott Mueller 2/14/24 10:51 AM Fire Department Scott Mueller 2/14/24 10:52 AM Planning Susana Montana 2/14/24 2:06 PM Planning Susana Montana 2/14/24 2:09 PM Planning Susana Montana 2/14/24 2:16 PM Planning Susana Montana 2/14/24 2:17 PM Planning Susana Montana 2/14/24 2:18 PM Water and Sewer Division Nick Pericich 2/14/24 3:22 PM Building Division Ben Abbey 2/21/24 10:25 AM Building Division Ben Abbey 2/21/24 10:35 AM Parks Department Ross Knapper 2/21/24 10:51 AM Building Division Ben Abbey 2/21/24 10:55 AM Water Rights Griffin Nielson 2/22/24 11:54 AM TYPE Changemark residential use in the M-1 zone per MDEQ MDEQ approval is required to approve concurrent construction for the residential portion (constructing public infrastructure and the building at the same time) due to a limitation on the COSA.. Infrastructure must be installed and accepted, or concurrent construction must be approved prior to building permit approval. Please contact engineer Simon Lindley for details. Changemark parking calculations Please provide a parking calculation box showing both the residential and non-residential parking requirements and spaces provided. Also show the bicycle parking required and provided. You state that this is shown on the cover sheet but I do not see it there. Changemark open space calculation box please show the residential parking required and provided as a table. Changemark parkland calculations I do not see the parkland calculations on the cover sheet. Please provide a calculation table. Changemark Other Block Frontage Table 510.030.G, row 3 Please describe how this north elevation of Building 2 meets the standards for having an entry visible and directly accessible from the street. If you seek a departure, please submit a Departure application form, and fee, and include a narrative and drawing as to how the proposed alternative meets the Departure Criteria of subsection 3. Changemark 38.530.070 Blank Walls Please show the width of the wall without windows or architectural treatments and demonstrate how you meet the blank wall standards of 38.530.070. Also, The north elevation on this sheet does not match the north elevation on sheet A3.1-2 for the same building. Changemark missing windows These are not shown on Sheet A3.2-2 for the same north elevation of Building 2. That sheet, A3.2-2 does not show the south elevation. Which sheets are correct? Changemark phased development There is no mention of a phased development for these 4 buildings yet sheet A1.1 is labeled Master Plan; why is that? Will you build all 4 buildings concurrently? If so, will you seek occupancy for any one of the buildings prior to completion of all four? If you do, we need a phasing plan and a Master Site Plan application in addition to any phase site plan is required per UDC 38.230.020.B. Changemark calculation tables This information does not travel well; I cannot download it with the data or images. Can you email smontana@bozeman.net with a separate PDF of this sheet? Thanks. Changemark patio or balcony? This patio space is not shown in the second floor plan so I am assuming it is only provided on the third floor plan and we would call it a balcony space and not a patio. Please show the dimensions of one of the spaces on the plan per UDC 38.520.060.B.3. Changemark rooftop open space The Cover Sheet shows the rooftop open space to be 850 sf. Which number is correct? Please make the numbers consistent. Changemark lobby space? This is not listed as residential open space in the Cover Sheet. Is it "extra" common open space for all users? Changemark parking required Based on the floor plans: Bldg 1 warehouse is 8,580 sf; Bldg 2 has 7,880 sf; Bldg 3 has 884 sf and Bldg 4 has 9,123 sf of warehouse/storage space for a total of 26,467 sf of warehouse/storage space/1,000=26 spaces required plus 4 spaces for the 1,400 sf of accessory office space. Bldg 1 has 3,280 sf of office, Bldg 3 has 1,025 sf for a total of 4,305 sf of office space / 250=17 spaces. There are 12 one-bedroom dwelling units and 2 two-bedroom units for a total parking requirement of 16 spaces. The total parking required for this development is 77 spaces and 7 bicycle spaces. Please double check your calculations based on your floor plan sheets and UDC 38.540.050. Changemark Open space The Bldg 1 second level roof deck is labeled 1,400 sf. Please make these numbers consistent. Also, please label the dimensions of the balcony open space elements and make those numbers consistent. Changemark parkland calcs Planning defers to Parks for this. Changemark building totals by use type Are these numbers consistent with the parking calculations? Changemark watercourse Please show and label the extent of the 50-foot watercourse setback that lies on your property per the subdivision plat. Changemark connection to common open space lot 2 Is there any reason you do not connect to the subdivision Open Space Lot 2 located immediately to the west of your lot? Changemark Foundation plantings per UDC 38.520.040.D.3 The east facade should have plantings between the building wall and sidewalk where there are no doors. Changemark sight visibility triangle If this is a shared access, please provide a sight visibility triangle. Changemark Building 4, not 4, 5 and 6 Changemark trash enclosure? Changemark Snow storage per 38.540.020.M Is this the only snow storage area? Is it sufficient for all the asphalt you have? Changemark percent drought tolerant trees Changemark percent drought tolerant shrubs Changemark Percent of residential space to non-residential space Table 38.310.040.C, note 6 Changemark % residential space of total Please note the total residential sf and the % residential space of the total. Changemark 38.540.020.M snow storage Snow storage cannot damage plants Changemark snow storage cannot damage plants Changemark snow storage areas these two snow storage areas are not labeled as such on the overall landscape plan. Changemark mislabeled? Is this sheet depicting Building 2 or 3? Changemark "patios" here Are the patios located on the second level and, if so, are they counting as required residential open space? If so, please show them here and label the dimensions. Changemark balconies These must be balconies, rather than patios. Library Comment BMC 38.410.130. Water Adequacy: The development will need to satisfy the water adequacy code requirement prior to a future site plan approval. If sufficient water rights cant be provided to offsets the development's annual demand then a cash-in-lieu of water rights (CILWR) payment will be required. The City assesses the CILWR fee at a rate of $6,000 per acre-foot. The fee determination will take place during the site plan review, however if there are any questions or if a preliminary review is desired please contact Griffin Nielsen with the Engineering/Utilities Department directly at gnielsen@bozeman.net or (406) 582-2279. The City encourages the use of groundwater wells to supply irrigation demands, which in turn will reduce the CILWR fee. Applicant must obtain a pre-determination from the DNRC demonstrating that a well groundwater well may be permitted under Montanas exempt appropriation or that provide the water right documentation if existing prior to finalization of the CILWR fee determination. Finally, the City would like to make the owner aware of an available CILWR rebate of approximately 20% for residential units if high-efficiency fixtures (toilets, washers, and shower heads) meeting the City Water Conservation Division standards are installed. The rebate would be released at occupancy and requires an agreement defining the terms and amount rebate be finalized and executed prior to final plan approval. If the owner is interested or has any questions please reach out to Griffin Nielsen. The applicant has acknowledged the CILWR comment above with CONR application. Receipt of CILWR will be a condition of site plan approval. Library Comment Concurrent construction has been an identified purpose of the initial project review. The applicant must complete the following concurrent construction form (https://www.bozeman.net/home/showpublishe ddocument/11704/637769761956630000) to apply for concurrent construction for on site or adjacent improvements associated with site development. Library Comment DSSP Plans and Specifications Review Policy A. -Plans, specifications, and submittals for public infrastructure improvements (water and sewer) must be submitted to the City Engineering Department through the engineering Project Dox Portal (https://www.bozeman.net/services/development-center) for infrastructure review. (List Improvements). Comment BMC 38.230.100 - Plan Review Criteria - The applicant must review section 38.230.100. Specifically, but not exclusively, show how future utilities (i.e. water, sewer, and electrical will service the properties units) as well as any existing easements. Please show the existing 10' private utility easement along the property frontage. Changemark ENG - NWE gas main There is a NWE gas main that appears to run underneath the footprint of building #1. Called the applicant on 2-13-24 to discuss, applicant reported that the easement has been recorded as released so the gas main is likely been removed or is inactive at this time. Comment Once this project is approved, each building will need to have a separate address, along with any units in each building. Changemark ENG - Sewer main adjacent DSSP Section V.B.11 - could sewer services from each building be connected to the existing main adjacent to the East side of the property in a 15' easement? Changemark STORMWATER BMC 40.04.710 Please provide additional details for the pond outlet (structural detail, pipe size, outfall location, etc.). Contours for the outlet pipe and creek interface are needed. DSSP. II.A.3.c Please provide details on the outlet for erosion protection at Cattail Creek. Changemark STORMWATER DSSP II.B.1 - Please include detail for stormwater detention pond, stream, outlet works, pipe, outfall location, contours, spot elevations etc. Changemark ENG- subdivision TIS reference BMC 38.220.080.A.2.g. - Traffic Generation - Please include reference to the subdivision TIS volumes previously allotted to the site for verification that the numbers being produced by the proposed site plan match the subdivision TIS. (avg weekday trips and AM and PM peak hour trips) Comment The applicant is advised that due to the known high groundwater and soil conditions within the proposed area of development an increased rate of corrosion has been observed with ductile iron water mains, thus decreasing the longevity of publicly owned and maintained infrastructure. The applicant must provide corrosion protection for all future water mains within the development and identify how the mains will be protected with future infrastructure submittal. Acceptable protection methods include zinc coated ductile iron or v-bio enhanced polyethylene encasement of the main. Corrosion protection can be waived, if the applicant can demonstrate that corrosion protection is not applicable for the proposed development. Typically, in order for a waiver to be granted, the applicant must consult the latest American Water Works Association and Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association (DIRPA) documentation for testing\evaluation procedures and provide an analysis demonstrating that corrosion protection is not needed throughout the entire development. Comment If sewer infrastructure is installed on site, additional Montana Department of Environmental Quality approvals may be required. There is a COSA re-write taking place currently with direct respect to subdivision sewer design. Please coordinate with the subdivision design engineer (Matt E. Ekstrom ) and MTDEQ to receive appropriate approvals and upload any conclusive correspondence with your next submittal. The City of Bozeman has been directed to refrain from providing and executing a municipal facilitates exclusion (MFE) for the subject project, and others in Nelson Meadows subdivision, at this time. Please reach out to the review engineer directly with any urgent questions you may have for the City concerning this item. Comment City of Bozeman Resolution 5076, Policy 1 - The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SIDs) on City standard form. The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of the improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to site plan approval. The city standard SID Waiver template, populated with the applicable streets and intersections is uploaded for population and execution in the City Documents file. Changemark W/S Curb box location This curb box appears to be in the parking space. Please move it a bit closer to the water main. Changemark W/S Curb box location This curb box appears to be in a parking space. You may need to move it closer to the water main if that's the case. Changemark Fire Riser Room Show landing/sidewalk from access door to public way and from FDC. Changemark Fire Line/Fire Riser Room Show fire line proposed for this building. Show landing/sidewalk from access door to public way and from FDC. Changemark Fire Riser Room Show landing/sidewalk from access door to public way and from FDC. Changemark total gross floor area Please label the total gross floor area of the Building and also the total gross floor area of the residential use, per 38.310.040.C, note 6. Provide this for both buildings that contain residential use. Changemark residential use in this industrial subdivision The Certificate of Subdivision Approval COSA from MT DEQ must be revised to account for residential use in this industrial subdivision. A site plan can be approved pending this COSA amendment or revision but a certificate of occupancy for residential use of any of the buildings will await that DEQ approval. Changemark bike parking 38.540.050.A.5 please ensure there is sufficient bike parking but also that it is situated well for usability. -For Building #2, the bike parking is too close to bumper overhand near the two parking spaces. This would negate the usability of these spaces. -For Building #1/south side of building, the bike parking appears to be inside a room of some sort. The circulation around it is limited. -For Building #1/north side by Prince, the bike parking is so close to the edge of the pavement that at least one space is not usable. Installation of bike parking should be done according to manufacturer recommendations, including spatial requirements for clearance for storage as well as removal and moving around the racks/site. Changemark secondary access BMC 38.400.010 A.8.- Secondary Access - Second or emergency access. To facilitate traffic movement, the provision of emergency services and the placement of utility easements, all developments must be provided with a second means of access. If, in the judgment of the development review committee (DRC), a second dedicated right-of-way cannot be provided for reasons of topography or other physical conditions, the developer must provide an emergency access, built to the standards detailed in these regulations. a. This provision may be waived or conditionally waived by the DRC. Please provide a proposal for secondary access to the site for review by the DRC with subsequent submittals. This item will be added and monitored as unresolved with subsequent submittals until it reaches a conclusion. The resolved condition must be achieved prior to site plan approval. Changemark PRAT trail It is noted that the subdivider installed the PRAT recommended trail on the lots to the west. Changemark W/S Water Services and Meters You can have one domestic water meter per building or property. If this is indeed one building, it will need to have one domestic water service and meter. Changemark BLDG - Accessible Units (Type B) ALL DWELLING UNITS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE TYPE B ON ALL FLOORS WITH ELEVATOR SERVICE. Changemark BLDG - Mixed Use - Fire Sprinklers Required MT ARM 24.301.146 (17) Delete Subsection 903.2.8 and replace with the following: 1. An approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided in all Group R buildings meeting any of the following criteria: d. more than 2 stories in other than dwelling units. Changemark Parks Please replace this information with the information provided in the Parkland tracking table located in the City Documents Folder. CILP value has been revised to $2.65/sf; included value in tracking table reflects value change. Changemark BLDG - Separation? The narrative provided, mentions that this building is proposed to use for small trade businesses. At Building Application provide a code path for rated separation required or not. It is possible small trades businesses would use these to perform work. Altering the intended occupancy, how is this limited or managed? Comment BMC 38.410.130. Water Adequacy: The development's estimated annual municipal water demand is 3.20 acre-feet. The annual demand must be offset prior to site plan approval. To offset the demand by paying cash-in-lieu of water rights a fee of $19,180 must be made prior to final site plan approval. FILENAME NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf 032_A3.2-2_BLDG2 RENDERINGS.pdf 032_A3.2-2_BLDG2 RENDERINGS.pdf 031_A3.1-2_BLDG2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 025_A2.3-1_BLDG1 THIRD LEVEL PLAN.pdf 024_A2.2-1_BLDG1 SECOND LEVEL PLAN.pdf 025_A2.3-1_BLDG1 THIRD LEVEL PLAN.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 016_L101_OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 017_L102_PLANT SCHEDULE AND NOTES.pdf 017_L102_PLANT SCHEDULE AND NOTES.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 021_A1.1_ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.pdf 021_A1.1_ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.pdf 021_A1.1_ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.pdf 035_A3.2-3_BLDG3 RENDERINGS.pdf 024_A2.2-1_BLDG1 SECOND LEVEL PLAN.pdf 025_A2.3-1_BLDG1 THIRD LEVEL PLAN.pdf 005_C1.1_GENERAL CIVIL.pdf 006_C2.0_UTILITIES PLAN.pdf 009_C2.3_STORMWATER PLAN AND PROFILE.pdf 011_C3.1_NORTH GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN.pdf Nelson Meadows Lot 15_Traffic Impact Letter.pdf 006_C2.0_UTILITIES PLAN.pdf 006_C2.0_UTILITIES PLAN.pdf 021_A1.1_ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN.pdf 006_C2.0_UTILITIES PLAN.pdf 019_L104_ENLARGED SOUTH LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf 023_A2.1-1_BLDG 1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf NELSON MEADOWS_NARRATIVE.pdf 005_C1.1_GENERAL CIVIL.pdf 004_C1.0_EXIST SITE CONDITIONS.pdf 006_C2.0_UTILITIES PLAN.pdf 024_A2.2-1_BLDG1 SECOND LEVEL PLAN.pdf 033_A2.1-3_BLDG3 FLOOR PLANS.pdf 001_COVER.pdf 036_A2.1-3_BLDG4 PLAN.pdf DISCUSSION The updated COSA has since been received to allow for the residential component. Shown on the cover sheet under "Parking" Not sure if you are referencing open space or parking…....... I've outlined all the open space and parking - if I need a table please provide an example. provided on cover an entry for building 2 has been shown facing the street. A block frontage diagram has been shown on A3.1 for both building 1 and 2. renderings are representational in nature . The A3.1 drawings will be the drawings used for permitting / construction. The blank wall requirements have been met and are depicted on the Block Frontage diagram. this has been coordinated The included concurrent construction plan now addresses this piece. not applicable. not applicable. not applicable. not applicable. Not Applicable. I have checked the calculations, Keep in mind I am using Net square footage vs. Gross for the calculation (-15% from gross). this has been coordinated OK Should be This should now reflect proper percentages. OK OK OK OK Griffin Nielsen has been contacted to see the next steps for water rights. Please see the imncluded concurrent construction application. Noted, the infrastructure applications will be applied for, once adequacy has been received for the site plan. Noted, please see the updated Civil sheets. Correct, that gas line does not exist anymore and has been abandoned. Noted Noted, see the updated utility plan for sewer services coming off the existing sewer main. Acknowledged, see the updated storm sheets. Acknowledged, see the updated storm sheets. An updated Traffic Impact Letter has been submitted and we are in converations with the City and MDT to resolve any traffic concerns. All water mains will wrapped V-bio. No sewer mains are planned to be installed onsite anymore. Noted, those will be provided in coordination with the City. Please see updated utility plan for curb box locations. Please see updated utility plan for curb box locations. Has been shown. Has been shown. Has been shown. Has been shown. Reviewer Response: Susana Montana - 2/15/24 11:38 AM Planning defers to Engineering comments. Bike parking has been revised. Reviewer Response: Susana Montana - 2/15/24 11:38 AM Planning defers to Engineering. Noted Noted Noted Noted has been replaced on cover will be addressed on bldg permit. Noted, thank you. STATUS Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Question Question Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Info Only Unresolved Unresolved Question Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Question Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Question Unresolved Unresolved Info Only Unresolved Info Only Info Only Info Only Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Info Only Unresolved Info Only Info Only Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Unresolved Info Only Unresolved Info Only Info Only Unresolved Info Only Info Only Unresolved Info Only Conditioned