HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025 Bozeman Creek Flood Mitigation and Reclamation PERPROJECT #23-157
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD
MITIGATION AND
RECLAMATION
FINAL - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
REPORT
BOZEMAN, MT
June 2025
Bozeman Creek Flood Mitigation
and Reclamation
Final - Preliminary Engineering Report
June 2025
Prepared for:
Montana Department of Commerce
301 S. Park Avenue
Helena, MT 59620
(406)841-2700
City of Bozeman Engineering Department
20 E. Olive St.
Bozeman, MT 59771
(406)582-2280
Prepared by:
Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
32 Discovery Drive
Bozeman, MT 59718
(406)582-0221
Chris J. Brown 6/9/25
Expires 6/30/2026
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................3
TABLES ..............................................................................................................................................3
APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................4
0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................5
1 PROJECT PLANNING ....................................................................................................................8
1.1 LOCATION ...........................................................................................................................8
1.2 FLOOD HISTORY AND OVERVIEW .........................................................................................8
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRESENT ............................................................................ 10
1.3.1 Land Resources ................................................................................................................... 10
1.3.2 Surface Water Resources .................................................................................................... 12
1.3.3 Wetland Areas ..................................................................................................................... 12
1.3.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................ 12
1.3.5 Historical Sites ..................................................................................................................... 14
1.3.6 Socio-Economic Issues ........................................................................................................ 15
1.4 POPULATION TRENDS ........................................................................................................ 16
1.5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 16
2 EXISTING FACILITIES .................................................................................................................. 17
2.1 LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................. 17
2.2 HISTORY ............................................................................................................................ 17
2.3 CONDITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES ................................................................................... 17
2.4 Design Flood Flows ............................................................................................................ 18
2.5 FINANCIAL STATUS OF ANY EXISTING FACILITIES ................................................................ 18
2.6 WATER/ENERGY/WASTE AUDITS ....................................................................................... 19
3 NEED FOR PROJECT ................................................................................................................... 19
3.1 HEALTH, SANITATION, AND SECURITY ................................................................................ 19
3.1.1 Health Risks ......................................................................................................................... 19
3.1.2 Sanitation Risks ................................................................................................................... 20
3.1.3 Security Risks to Critical Infrastructure ............................................................................... 21
3.2 AGING INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 21
3.2.1 Bozeman Creek Crossings ................................................................................................... 22
3.2.2 Mill Ditch ............................................................................................................................. 23
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 1
3.3 REASONABLE GROWTH ..................................................................................................... 23
3.3.1 Population ........................................................................................................................... 23
3.3.2 Climate Change ................................................................................................................... 23
4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ..................................................................................................... 24
4.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE .................................................................................................. 24
4.2 ALTERNATIVE ONE – BOZEMAN CREEK CONVEYANCE ENHANCEMENT ................................ 27
4.2.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 27
4.2.2 Design Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 29
4.2.3 Map ..................................................................................................................................... 30
4.2.4 Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................................... 31
4.2.5 Land Requirements ............................................................................................................. 32
4.2.6 Potential Construction Problems ........................................................................................ 33
4.2.7 Sustainability Considerations .............................................................................................. 33
4.2.8 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................... 33
4.3 ALTERNATIVE TWO – MILL DITCH DESIGN FLOOD MITIGATION ........................................... 34
4.3.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 34
4.3.2 Design Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 36
4.3.3 Map ..................................................................................................................................... 37
4.3.4 Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................................... 38
4.3.5 Land Requirements ............................................................................................................. 39
4.3.6 Potential Construction Problems ........................................................................................ 39
4.3.7 Sustainability Considerations .............................................................................................. 40
4.3.8 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................... 40
4.4 ALTERNATIVE THREE – BOZEMAN CREEK HYDRAULIC CROSSING REPLACEMENT & TUNNELS
STABILIZATION ............................................................................................................................. 41
4.4.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 41
4.4.2 Design Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 41
4.4.3 Map ..................................................................................................................................... 42
4.4.4 Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................................... 44
4.4.5 Land Requirements ............................................................................................................. 44
4.4.6 Potential Construction Problems ........................................................................................ 44
4.4.7 Sustainability Considerations .............................................................................................. 44
4.4.8 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................... 44
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 2
4.5 ALTERNATIVE FOUR – BOZEMAN CREEK HYDRAULIC CROSSING REPLACEMENT .................. 45
4.5.1 Description .......................................................................................................................... 45
4.5.2 Design Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 46
4.5.3 Map ..................................................................................................................................... 46
4.5.4 Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................................... 47
4.5.5 Land Requirements ............................................................................................................. 47
4.5.6 Potential Construction Problems ........................................................................................ 48
4.5.7 Sustainability Considerations .............................................................................................. 48
4.5.8 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................... 48
4.6 OTHER ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED .................................................................................... 49
4.6.1 Upstream Storage Reservoir ............................................................................................... 49
4.6.2 Diversion of Stream Around Bozeman ................................................................................ 52
5 SELECTION OF AN ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................ 53
5.1 LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 53
5.1.1 Benefit-Cost Ratio and Net Benefits ................................................................................... 53
5.2 NON-MONETARY FACTORS ................................................................................................ 53
5.2.1 Operations and Maintenance Considerations .................................................................... 54
5.2.2 Real Estate Acquisition ........................................................................................................ 54
5.2.3 Social Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 54
5.2.4 Environmental Impacts ....................................................................................................... 55
5.2.5 Constructability Considerations .......................................................................................... 56
6 PROPOSED PROJECT (RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVES) .............................................................. 57
6.1 PRELIMINARY PROJECT DESIGN ......................................................................................... 57
6.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE ........................................................................................................... 59
6.3 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................... 59
6.4 TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE ........................................................................................ 59
6.5 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET ........................................................................................... 59
6.5.1 INCOME ............................................................................................................................... 59
6.5.2 ANNUAL O&M COSTS .......................................................................................................... 59
6.5.3 FUNDING OPTIONS ............................................................................................................. 59
7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. 59
8 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 60
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 3
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Historic Bozeman Creek Flooding 1981 (courtesy of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle) ................8
Figure 2 - Historic Bozeman Creek Flooding 1948 (courtesy of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle) .............. 10
Figure 3 – Project Study Area ............................................................................................................ 11
Figure 4 - Historic Bozeman Creek Main Street Crossing .................................................................... 14
Figure 5 - Flood Hazard Categories .................................................................................................... 20
Figure 6 - No Action/Existing Condition Alternative Overview ........................................................... 25
Figure 7 – Range of Depth-Damage Models Used for PER .................................................................. 26
Figure 8 – Typical Section for Alternative One ................................................................................... 28
Figure 9 - Alternative One Overview ................................................................................................. 31
Figure 10 – Typical Section for Alternative Two ................................................................................. 35
Figure 11 - Alternative Two Overview ............................................................................................... 38
Figure 12 - Alternative Three Overview ............................................................................................. 43
Figure 13 - Alternative Four Overview............................................................................................... 47
Figure 14 – Upstream Storage Overview ........................................................................................... 51
Figure 15 – Conceptual Plan and Profile view of tunnel ..................................................................... 52
Figure 16 - Alternative One or Two Typical Cartoon Section .............................................................. 58
TABLES
Table 1 - Fish Species Present in Bozeman Creek ............................................................................... 13
Table 2 - Gallatin County Species of Concern ..................................................................................... 13
Table 3 – Summary of Key Hydraulic Structures ................................................................................ 17
Table 4 - Bozeman Creek AEP Flows (FEMA, 2021) ............................................................................ 18
Table 5 – Summary of Existing Condition Flood Data ......................................................................... 24
Table 6 – Summary of Alternative One Flood Data ............................................................................ 29
Table 7 - Alternative One Economic Analysis ..................................................................................... 34
Table 8 – Summary of Alternative Two Flood Data ............................................................................ 36
Table 9 - Alternative Two Economic Analysis..................................................................................... 40
Table 10 – Summary of Alternative Three Flood Data ........................................................................ 42
Table 11 - Alternative Three Economic Analysis ................................................................................ 45
Table 12 – Summary of Alternative Four Flood Data .......................................................................... 46
Table 13 - Alternative Four Economic Analysis .................................................................................. 49
Table 14 – Benefit-Cost Ratio Analysis .............................................................................................. 53
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Existing Utilities
Appendix B – Model Results
Appendix C – Economic Investigations
Appendix D – Community Engagement
Appendix E – Existing Facilities
Appendix F – Historical Resources
Appendix G – Environmental Resources
Appendix H – Effective Mapping
Appendix I – Alternatives Overview
5
0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bozeman Creek has been subject to flooding for more than 100 years. The creek, which has its source in
the Gallatin Mountain Range south of Bozeman, Montana, is subject to seasonal snow melt and
spring/early summer rainfall. This combination of snow melt, and rainfall can lead to floods along the
creek in May or June in any given year. Historical research undertaken by Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
(AESI) for this report revealed evidence of significant floods in 1927, 1939, 1943, 1948, 1963, 1969, 1981,
1997, and 2011. As the downtown area along Bozeman Creek has become more urbanized over time, the
extent of flood damage has increased accordingly. However, in 1982, the City implemented stormwater
detention and retention requirements within City limits to mitigate the impact of growth in the urbanized
area subsequently limiting stormwater runoff from new development to the predevelopment condition.
Additionally, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has recently mapped the flood hazard
associated with Bozeman Creek. That mapping communicates the flood hazard to the community, and
building owners are required to have flood insurance if they have a federally-backed loan on a structure
in the floodplain or voluntarily may elect flood insurance if they have no loan on a property. Subsequently,
the City’s floodplain program protects the floodplain from being exacerbated by new development within
City limits.
A major contributor to flooding along Bozeman Creek is the insufficient hydraulic conveyance through
existing culverts, tunnels, and beneath small bridges. More than 20 separate structures do not provide
sufficient hydraulic capacity to convey a 100-year flood. The tunnel under Main Street is estimated to only
have 50% or less of the required conveyance capacity to convey a 100-year flood flow. During any large
floods, this tunnel is a bottleneck and exacerbates flooding in the downtown Bozeman area. Due to the
age and overall poor condition of the Main Street tunnel, there is concern that the tunnel could fail. Such
a failure would worsen downtown flooding.
To examine the flooding issues further and develop potential solutions to mitigate flood risk beyond the
FEMA flood insurance program and City development requirements, AESI prepared a grant application for
a “Planning Grant” from the Montana Coal Endowment Fund on behalf of the City of Bozeman and
Bozeman Downtown Urban Renewal District (URD). The URD offered to provide a local cost-share match
for the grant of $10,000, while the Coal Endowment Fund would cover the remaining $40,000. City of
Bozeman staff would provide in-kind services and manage the grant and contract with an engineering
firm. The Planning Grant required development of a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) outlining the
opportunities, problems, and potential alternative solutions. The grant application was successful. AESI
was then selected for the work and began development of this study in July 2024.
The PER is designed to examine and better understand the nature of the flood hazards, as well as develop
preliminary sustainable concepts to mitigate the flood hazards. Furthermore, alternative concepts
developed in this project aim to mitigate the identified flood hazards in a feasible manner while
minimizing negative social and environmental impacts. The opportunity to incorporate stream
restoration, recreational improvements, and public art into any solution is also envisioned. It is notable
that all flood hazard mitigation alternatives fully evaluated in this PER have favorable benefit-cost ratios
well above 1.0; albeit the alternatives come at a high cost ranging from about $37,000,000 to $80,000,000.
While these evaluations are preliminary, the analyses to date show that the benefits of flood mitigation
outweigh the potential costs under a range of potential planning scenarios. As noted previously,
6
secondary goals for the project include encouraging environmental viability and stream restoration, and
improving both recreational access and downtown connectivity. The data presented in this report are
intended to support future community outreach efforts and help inform next-step master planning efforts
for improvements along Bozeman Creek.
A key part of the overall PER analytical effort completed by AESI centers on the modification and
expansion of existing floodplain hydraulic models originally developed and published by FEMA. Model
simulations allow the prediction of flood inundation across the project area, as well as an assessment of
the potential beneficial effects of flood mitigation alternatives. Existing one-dimensional HEC-RAS models
define the current FEMA regulatory floodplain (e.g., Flood Insurance Maps or FIRM) for Bozeman Creek.
For this study, more sophisticated and accurate two-dimensional HEC-RAS modeling was performed by
AESI to better understand flooding conditions and develop mitigation strategies. However, this work was
completed using only Bozeman LiDAR information (no ground survey data), without first floor surveys of
buildings and using flood flows slightly higher than the 100-year event, which were intended to simulate
the possible impacts of future climate change. While two-dimensional HEC-RAS modeling software can
better simulate flows through urban environments and complex hydraulic structures, for regulatory
purposes, the current FEMA floodplain maps should continue to be used until such time that a two
dimensional flood study is commissioned for this corridor.
The scope of this project was limited to approximately 1.8 miles of the downtown corridor of Bozeman
Creek, as this area is anticipated to have the highest flooding damage. Also, AESI and the City of Bozeman
agreed to limit this first PER evaluation to the “No Action” (e.g. existing condition) case along with a limited
number of potential alternatives. The modeling domain extends from south of Ice House Park in central
Bozeman to Interstate 90 (I-90). Future work will likely need to extend the modeling further downstream
from I-90 to the East Gallatin River and possibly further upstream of the current model domain to better
assess those areas. However, the analysis to date of four alternatives plus the “No Action” alternative
provides a good basis for efficiently estimating variations and combinations of the alternatives evaluated
in this PER.
Four primary alternatives were modeled to mitigate the flood hazard. These four alternatives, named
simply Alternatives One, Two, Three and Four provide a good starting point for potential mitigation of the
modeled flooding hazard. All four alternatives have positive benefit-cost ratios that would repay the
estimated initial project costs several times over through prevented flood damage in the next 50 years. In
addition to economic considerations, AESI also presents and discusses (in a preliminary manner) other
important alternative performance metrics to be considered during the public involvement process. It is
envisioned that citizens and stakeholders in consultation with the City will refine the list of performance
metrics to support the comparison of alternatives. The subsequent paragraphs describe each of the four
project alternatives.
Alternative One focuses on the existing Bozeman Creek alignment and includes conveyance
improvements along the entire study area from Ice House Park to I-90. Conveyance improvements include
modifications (or removal) of 18 culverts, tunnels, and bridges to pass a flood flow of about 1,250 cfs
which is a bit larger than the 100-year flood. Besides the structure modifications, the channel cross-section
would also be modified to increase conveyance. The final channel bottom width would vary from about
20 to 26 feet with channel side slopes of 2.5 horizontal to 1.0 vertical (2.5H:1V) slope. Alternative One
7
would require about 4.4 acres of property acquisition including parcels at Main Street to create the
needed conveyance. Some minor recreational improvements are also proposed as part of the alternative.
Alternative Two focuses on bypassing flood water through the Story Mill Ditch. Under this alternative,
flood flow greater than about 425 cfs would be diverted to an improved Mill Ditch alignment. Conveyance
improvements to convey about 825 cfs of flood flow to the Mill Ditch would be required. Twelve existing
undersized bridges and culverts would have to be modified or replaced to convey the planned flood flow.
Besides the structure modifications, the channel cross-section would also be modified to increase
conveyance. The final channel bottom width would vary from about 22 to 26 feet with channel side slopes
of 2.5H:1V slope. Alternative Two would require about 2.9 acres of property acquisition including one
parcel at Main Street. Some minor recreational improvements are also proposed as part of the alternative.
Alternative Three focuses on the existing Bozeman Creek alignment and includes more limited conveyance
improvements along the entire study area from Ice House Park to I-90 including upgrades to the
conveyance under I-90. Conveyance improvements include modifications (or removal) of 17 culverts,
tunnels, and bridges to pass a flood flow of about 1,250 cfs which as noted earlier is a bit larger than the
100-year flood. The existing channel geometry would be maintained with no modifications proposed. This
alternative is the same as Alternative Four (described below) with the exception that the three downtown
tunnels would not be modified substantially. Under this alternative, the three tunnels would only be
stabilized against failure. AESI assumed that stabilization of the tunnels would not increase their hydraulic
conveyance capacity. Alternative Three would require minimal property acquisition. Some minor
recreational improvements are also proposed as part of the alternative.
Alternative Four also focuses on the existing Bozeman Creek alignment and includes limited conveyance
improvements along the entire study area from Ice House Park to I-90. Conveyance improvements include
modifications (or removal) of 21 culverts, tunnels, and bridges to pass a flood flow of about 1,250 cfs. The
existing channel geometry would be maintained with no modifications proposed. Alternative Four would
require about 1.3 acres of property acquisition including parcels at Main Street. Some minor recreational
improvements are also proposed as part of the alternative.
One variation to Alternative Four is also discussed within the report. Under this variation, the three
downtown tunnels would be widened rather than removed, using geotechnical underpinning techniques
to support the existing buildings. This would eliminate the need to acquire property in downtown
Bozeman with the exception that additional square footage under these buildings would be required to
allow the tunnels to be expanded. Significantly more work (outside this PER) will be required to assess
the current condition of the foundations under each building and the feasibility of underpinning.
There are many variations to the alternatives evaluated in this PER. The final preferred alternative will
require more analysis and public input. Also, hybrid combinations of the alternatives may be feasible. The
overall implementation of alternatives is likely to take several decades due to the potential cost and
complexity. It is likely a project of this scale would be implemented in phases. Another key consideration
of any of the alternatives considered is the final disposition of the existing underground tunnel system
beneath Main Street and other streets downtown. These tunnels are in poor condition and at the very
least should be stabilized to prevent failure. However, the ownership of these tunnels is a combination of
multiple public and private owners. Therefore, any rehabilitation of the tunnel system will require a
public-private partnership.
8
1 PROJECT PLANNING
1.1 LOCATION
Bozeman Creek runs through the City of Bozeman in Gallatin County, Montana. Bozeman Creek originates
in the headwaters of the Hyalite Range (part of the Gallatin Mountain Range) and flows northward toward
the City of Bozeman. The analysis conducted in this report targets the reach of Bozeman Creek from South
Church Avenue to Gold Avenue. The analyzed reach runs through downtown and ends just downstream
of I-90.
This report also includes the analysis and design of a flood bypass route that would enhance conveyance
through Mill Ditch, an irrigation ditch that runs parallel to Bozeman Creek. Water from Bozeman Creek is
presently diverted for irrigation into Mill Ditch downstream of the Galligator Trail crossing near South
Church Avenue. During a flood, some flow leaves the main Bozeman Creek floodplain and follows Mill
Ditch. Mill Ditch flows into the East Gallatin River northeast of Bohart Lane.
1.2 FLOOD HISTORY AND OVERVIEW
The City of Bozeman has experienced floods along the Bozeman Creek corridor over the past 100 years.
The creek, which has its source in the Hyalite/Gallatin Range south of Bozeman, is subject to seasonal
snow melt and spring/early summer rainfall. This combination of snow melt and rainfall can lead to floods
along the creek in May or June in any given year. Historical data collected by AESI for this report revealed
evidence of significant floods in 1927, 1939, 1943, 1948, 1963, 1969, 1981, 1997, and 2011. Figures 1 and
2 document past historical flooding.
Figure 1 - Historic Bozeman Creek Flooding 1981 (courtesy of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle)
9
The historical records indicate flooding has been substantial in some cases and resulted in millions of
dollars of estimated damage. Also, flooding of multiple basements, first floors, and outbuildings are
mentioned in various historic newspaper articles. A 1948 newspaper article published in the Bozeman
Daily Chronicle about the April 15, 1948, flood specifically mentions major flooding in the downtown
Bozeman area bounded by Black Avenue and Rouse Ave west to east and Olive Street to Mendenhall
Street south to north. This congested area currently includes many large, multi-story buildings and is also
the location of the historical underground stream tunnels. Since these tunnels are too small to convey
larger flood flows, the water spills out into downtown Bozeman and inundates downtown structures.
Many of the larger flood events appear to have occurred before 1980 prior to when the National Flood
Insurance Program started collecting data on flood insurance claims. The FEMA flood insurance database
indicates there are about 100 flood policies in the 59715 zip code. It is important to note that properties
owned outright by a party, rather than financed by a bank mortgage, are not required to carry flood
insurance.
10
Figure 2 - Historic Bozeman Creek Flooding 1948 (courtesy of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle)
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRESENT
Environmental resources present in the Bozeman Creek project area are discussed below and include land
resources, surface water resources, wetland areas, biological resources, and historical sites. These
resources are important planning variables that should be considered in determining the optimal flood
mitigation plan.
1.3.1 Land Resources
The targeted reach of Bozeman Creek and adjacent Mill Ditch resides entirely in the urban landscape of
the City of Bozeman. Figure 3 provides an overview of the study area along with a depiction of flooding
11
from the 100-year flood event simulated by AESI’s two-dimensional (2D) flood model. Figure 3 also
provides the location of some key stream crossings.
Figure 3 – Project Study Area Bozeman Creek is constrained to a small corridor once it enters the City of Bozeman. The traditional
floodplain of the stream has been developed over the years, leaving very little open space along the
stream banks. Historically, the stream has been straightened, with meanders and bends removed as the
city developed. The banks of the stream are generally armored and/or raised to minimize overtopping
onto private properties.
12
1.3.2 Surface Water Resources
Headwater and spring creeks originating in the Hyalite Range or foothills, including Leverich/Spring Creek
and Limestone Creek, supply water to Bozeman Creek. The City of Bozeman maintains a surface water
intake on Bozeman Creek, located upstream of the project area. This water source is a critical supply for
the City of Bozeman’s drinking water system. Additionally, a breached earthen dam located on Mystic
Lake exists as part of Bozeman Creek headwaters. This breached dam no longer impounds water. As an
interesting side note, the entire watershed was closed to all public access (even hiking) until the mid-
1960’s in order to protect the City of Bozeman municipal water supply. Isolated historic signage still exists
along remote sections of the drainage divides stating that the drainage is closed to all public access. Local
lore indicates that the headwater area was eventually opened to public hiking and hunting because
wallowing by the high elk populations was affecting water quality in Bozeman Creek. In any case, the
present restricted (non-motorized) access in the forested public headwaters area still provides a pristine
and high-quality water supply for the City of Bozeman. However, water quality lower in the basin, in
particular within the subject reach through the City of Bozeman, is impacted by sediments and dissolved
components introduced by storm water runoff and other non-point sources.
Bozeman Creek joins the East Gallatin River near East Griffin Drive north of the study area. The East
Gallatin River is a primary tributary of the Gallatin River. The river provides miles of trout habitat and is a
popular recreation site for fly-fishing. Additionally, the East Gallatin River directly irrigates many farm
fields along its corridor.
1.3.3 Wetland Areas
The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, n.d.) map designates
multiple areas coinciding with the project area as “Forested/Shrub” wetland area. Many of these wetland
areas are found along the Mill Ditch and Story Mill Park on Bozeman Creek.
The Indreland Audubon Wetland Preserve (IAWP), managed by the Sacagawea Audubon Society, is also
within the project area, located near the downstream end of the Mill Ditch. The existing wetland area
within the IAWP is a large freshwater emergent wetland and freshwater forested/shrub wetland. Another
significant wetland area exists south of the location of the Galligator Trail crossing of Bozeman Creek near
South Church Avenue. Any wetlands filled or altered by a flood mitigation project will require wetland
mitigation.
A complete overview of the wetland areas designated by NWI can be found in Appendix G.
1.3.4 Biological Resources
Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks identifies nine fish species present in the Bozeman Creek waterway
(Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, n.d.). Of these nine species, six are native to Montana and three are
introduced. The species present in Bozeman Creek are summarized in Table 1.
13
Table 1 - Fish Species Present in Bozeman Creek Species Family Native to Montana
Brook Trout Trout Introduced
Brown Trout Trout Introduced
Longnose Dace Minnow Native
Longnose Sucker Sucker Native
Mottled Sculpin Sculpin Native
Mountain Sucker Sucker Native
Rainbow Trout Trout Introduced
White Sucker Sucker Native
Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Trout Native
Animal and plant species of concern were identified from Species of Concern reports published by the
Montana Natural Heritage Program ( (Heritage, Animal Species of Concern, 2022) and (Heritage, Plant
Species of Concern, 2022) ). Species of concern were identified as species present in Gallatin County that
held high risk or at-risk status at the global or state ranking level. A total 17 animal species and 10 plant
species are identified in Table 2 as species of concern.
The Montana Natural Heritage Program provides a global rank to denote range-wide status and a state
rank to denote state status. Both ranking systems are on a scale out of 5. A ranking of G1 or S1 signifies
high risk due to extremely limited or rapidly declining population, range, or habitat. G2 or S2 signifies risk
due to very limited or potentially declining population, range, or habitat. A combination status (i.e. G1G2)
indicates uncertainty in the status. A “B” qualifier (i.e. S2B) denotes risk present only during breeding
season. “T” sub-ranks indicate rank of a subspecies or variety.
Table 2 - Gallatin County Species of Concern
Animal Species of Concern
Name Global
Rank
State
Rank USFS BLM
Bison G4 S2
Greater Sage-Grouse G3G4 S2 Sensitive Sensitive
Harlequin Duck G4 S2B Sensitive
Black Rosy-Finch G4 S2
Graw-crowned Rosy-Finch G5 S2
Lewis’s Woodpecker G4 S2B Species of Conservation Concern Sensitive
Western Toad G4 S2 Sensitive Sensitive
Westslope Cutthroat Trout G5T4 S2 Sensitive Sensitive
Suckley Cuckoo Bumble Bee G2G3 S1
Frigga Gritillary G5 S1S2
Hooked Snowfly G5 S2
Alberta Snowfly G4G5 S2
Springs Stripetail G5 S2
Striate Disc G5 S1
Western Pearshell G3G4 S2 Sensitive Sensitive
Gallatin Mountainsnail G5T1 S1
Stygobromus puteanus G1G2 S1S2
14
Plant Species of Concern
Name Global
Rank
State
Rank USFS BLM
Annual Indian Paintbrush G5T5 S2 Species of Conservation Concern
Slender Indian Paintbrush G3G4 S2
Dense-leaf Draba G5 S2 Sensitive
Species of Conservation Concern
Whipple’s Beardtongue G5 S2
Northwestern Thelypody G2 S1 Sensitive
Species of Conservation Concern
Sleder Thelypody G4 S2
Ute Ladies’-tresses G2G3 S1S2
Limprichtia Moss G5 S1
Norwegian Synchtrichia Moss G5 S1
Antler Twist Moss G3G5 S1
USFS = United States Forest Service; BLM = United States Bureau of Land Management
1.3.5 Historical Sites
Given the project’s location in the heart of Bozeman, many historical sites are found along the Bozeman
Creek and Mill Ditch corridors. For this project, the most notable historical sites are the historical
structures constructed over the top or adjacent the Bozeman Creek tunnels. In the late 1800s, as the
population of Bozeman grew, the downtown area extended to the banks of Bozeman Creek. To
accommodate the growth, business owners opted to build new structures and roads over the creek,
encapsulating the creek within tunnels. A view of downtown Bozeman in the 1860s can be seen in Figure
4, with the bridge in the foreground running over Bozeman Creek.
Figure 4 - Historic Bozeman Creek Main Street Crossing
15
Ultimately, three tunnels were constructed: one downstream of Olive Street that extends along South
Rouse Avenue, another under Babcock Street including the buildings on its southern side, and a third
under Main Street, spanning the buildings on both sides of the downtown corridor.
Of the tunnels, the Main Street tunnel exists as the longest and most likely to contribute to damage from
flooding. Spanning from an alley to the edge of the Bar IX building on each side of Main Street, the 420-
foot-long tunnel is comprised of three separate sections. These sections include a stone arch under Main
Street and two stone channels built into the foundations of two historic brick buildings. In places, the
stone channels have been reinforced using concrete but are generally not only undersized but are also
aged and vulnerable to failure. The stone and concrete channels under the buildings are topped by wood-
framed roofs that are integral to the buildings above them. Two buildings are found over the Main Street
tunnel. The northern building, 311 through 315 East Main Street, is presently occupied by Bar Nine, Vino
per Tutti, and Bozeman DSL. The southern building at 312 East Main Street is currently home to Nova
Café. The Eagles Lodge building is also adjacent to these areas and potentially also threatened in the event
of a tunnel failure.
The study area encompasses many other historical sites given its proximity to downtown Bozeman.
Appendix F provides a summary of historical buildings and districts identified by the National Register of
Historical Places (National Park Service, 2020). Of note, many of the buildings near or over the Main Street
tunnel system are registered on the National Register of Historic Places for the United States. This
designation makes these buildings somewhat unique in a fast-growing and relatively new city like
Bozeman. This designation also means that the buildings must be considered for protection or mitigation.
1.3.6 Socio-Economic Issues
This PER analyzes alternatives to reduce flooding in the downtown commercial and residential areas of
Bozeman. While it is not unusual for flooding to be caused by undersized bridges and other hydraulic
structures, the downtown flooding caused by Bozeman Creek has been locked in by undersized tunnels
on which significant historic buildings were constructed over 100 years ago. The confining nature of these
structures has caused flooding over a portion of the City as indicated by the effective FEMA flood maps
(FEMA, 2021) and confirmed using the 2D modelling performed as part of this PER. These tunnels also
present a higher-than-normal risk of plugging as a result of the possibility of the aging tunnels collapsing
or by debris (trees) getting lodged within the tunnels due to their irregular cross sections and bends.
Plugging of the tunnels may cause even more flooding than predicted by the effective FEMA flood maps
which assume the tunnels remain unimpeded during flooding.
A significant question relates to who is responsible for maintenance of the tunnels. It appears to the
authors of this PER that the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is responsible for the portion
of the tunnel under Main Street and the building owners are responsible for their respective portions of
the tunnel. However, legal review is needed to ascertain responsibility for maintaining these tunnels,
given they extend under privately held property, MDT right-of-way, and City of Bozeman right-of-way.
While there are numerous other private and public restrictions to conveyance along Bozeman Creek, the
above-described tunnels and overlying or immediately adjacent buildings are at the heart of the socio-
economic issues. Those issues include concerns related to historic preservation and potential impacts to
downtown businesses and homes.
16
The Bozeman Creek channel downstream of the tunnels has been “protected” from large flows by the
tunnel constrictions. This condition has likely been partially responsible for further constriction by other
undersized hydraulic structures and encroachment on the natural channel by buildings, homes, and other
developments downstream of the tunnels.
The City of Bozeman regulates the effective FEMA mapped floodplain and floodway which comprise the
existing channel and some streets. Regulations include floodplain permitting and watercourse setbacks.
This has prevented significant investments in more buildings and constrictions in the floodway in the last
several decades as floodplain development permitting and stream setbacks have matured to their present
state. City development code regulates significant stream setbacks that are larger for Bozeman Creek (75
feet) as opposed to smaller water courses flowing through the City, which require a 50 foot setback. As
new development is proposed adjacent to Bozeman Creek, these setbacks continue to be imperative to
protect the stream corridor.
At this point, the natural conveyance capacity of the existing channel cannot be restored simply by
removing the downtown tunnels. The other undersized upstream and downstream structures and
encroachments into the channel must also be removed or modified. The existing channel cross section
must also be enlarged along certain reaches to convey the 100-year regulatory flood through the City
without damage. In this regard, a strategy of working from downstream to upstream removing hydraulic
constrictions would alleviate the issue of relocating constrictions from one point to another along
Bozeman Creek.
1.4 POPULATION TRENDS
Bozeman is one of the fastest growing places in the nation. The population of the City was estimated to
be about 45,250 in 2016 (City of Bozeman, 2020). As part of the City of Bozeman Community Plan –
Appendix C, (City of Bozeman, 2020), the City of Bozeman was projected to increase its population by
nearly 27,500 by 2045. Therefore, the estimated population of Bozeman in 2045 is expected to be about
72,750.
1.5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Bozeman Creek has become a priority topic for the Bozeman City Commission. The City of Bozeman
intends to conduct a robust community engagement effort to interface with the community and various
stakeholders about this project. Information gained throughout the community engagement process will
likely result in modifications to project performance metrics and project alternatives.
17
2 EXISTING FACILITIES
2.1 LOCATION MAP
See detailed project maps located in Appendix E for existing facilities, including bridge, culvert, and tunnel
hydraulic structures, located along Bozeman Creek and Mill Ditch.
2.2 HISTORY
As the population of Bozeman grew in the late 1800’s, so did the community’s infrastructure. Roads and
buildings were built around or on top of the waterway. See Appendix E for a list of the existing hydraulic
structures.
Stream gage data for Bozeman Creek is sparse. USGS Gage 060470500 was installed in 1951 and recorded
daily data until 1953. The peak flow recorded during this period was on June 4, 1953, at 233 cfs. A new
gage was installed by DNRC north of the City in June of 2018. The gage is located near Bond Street bridge.
The highest flow recorded at the gage was on June 1, 2022, at 219.29 cfs. Large flooding events have
occurred while stream gage data was not available. Flooding events of significance include 1948, 1963,
1981, and 2011. Photos of historic flooding events can be found in Appendix F.
In June of 2017, the City of Bozeman celebrated the completion of the restoration of a stretch of Bozeman
Creek along Bogert Park. Restoration work included bio-engineered bank stabilization, increased channel
capacity, channel features to promote fish habitat, and improved recreational access.
The Rouse Avenue and Peach Street hydraulic crossings were replaced in 2018 as part of the MDT
expansion of Rouse Avenue from Main Street.
2.3 CONDITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES
The age of existing facilities along Bozeman Creek and Mill Ditch varies from new to over one hundred
years old. Appendix E lists all of the hydraulic structures and their estimated capacity in the main channels
of Bozeman Creek and Mill Ditch. Appendix E also lists the probable ownership entity for each structure.
Table 3 highlights a few of those with the smallest conveyance capacity.
Table 3 – Summary of Key Hydraulic Structures
Hydraulic Structure ID Size of Opening (Height X Width
in feet)
Estimated Conveyance Capacity
from HEC-RAS/HY-8 (CFS)
Main Street Tunnel 6.4 X 13.6 622
Main Street Alley Culvert (north
of Main Street)
5.0 X 12 451
Mendenhall Bridge 4.4 X 12 344
Lamme Street Bridge 2.92 X 11.9 237
Olive/Rouse Street Tunnel 5.1 X 17.5 637
Babcock Street Tunnel 5.3 X 14 528
The Bozeman Creek tunnel hydraulic structures in the downtown area are in disrepair. AESI scanned the
tunnels using terrestrial LiDAR instrument in 2016. These scans create highly detailed 3D models that
provide accurate measurements and models of the tunnels. AESI performed another scan of the tunnels
in 2024. See Appendix E for the terrestrial LiDAR scanning data.
18
These site visits and scans indicate areas of erosion and deterioration in the tunnel walls and ceiling which
in some areas have worsened over the 8 years between scans. Several characteristics that could lead to
debris blockage were also observed. For instance, both the Babcock and Olive/Rouse tunnels contain
approximately 40-degree bends, which increase the probability of debris blockage. In fact, a small log was
discovered in the Babcock tunnel. The Main Street tunnel also has a bend at its upstream side. All the
tunnels have changes in cross section, size, and material type within their length. Changes in shape
provide additional “ledges” on which debris can catch.
2.4 Design Flood Flows
Flood flows have been adopted from the Gallatin County Flood Insurance Study (Montana Department of
Natural Resources and Conservation, 2014) and the more recent FEMA Flood Insurance Report (FEMA,
2021). Flows assigned to each Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) event for Bozeman Creek are listed in
Table 4. Note that the 1% AEP corresponds to the 1 in 100-year flood. Flows used in the HEC-RAS model
generally conform to these values when accounting for all split flows.
Table 4 - Bozeman Creek AEP Flows (FEMA, 2021)
Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) Flow (cfs)
10% 531
4% 726
2% 884
1% 1,052
0.2% 1,485
The design flow used for this study is 1,250 cfs. This flow was chosen to provide a small buffer to the
current 1% AEP for possible flow increases due to climate change such as more often rain on snow events.
Also, project alternative cost estimates are based upon providing the hydraulic conveyance required for
the design flow.
The hydraulic capacity of the existing stream hydraulic structures along Bozeman Creek and Mill Ditch are
currently not adequate to pass most flood flows. No hydraulic structures in their existing conditions have
the capacity to pass the design flow. The hydraulic capacity of each structure is provided in Appendix E.
The limited capacity of both the hydraulic structures and channel, combined with the historic relocation
of the main channel, has created a floodplain impacting a portion of the downtown corridor.
Comprehensive model results can be found in Appendix B.
2.5 FINANCIAL STATUS OF ANY EXISTING FACILITIES
The structures in this study have various owners and states of service. The authors of this PER assume
that the ownership of the various structures coincides with the ownership of the property or any specific
easement for the structures. Below is a preliminary description of owners of the structures based on that
assumption:
• Ownership of the Tunnels – Portions of the tunnels that are on private property and are
components of the overlying buildings are believed to be owned by the building/property
owners. Portions of the tunnels within public right-of-way or easements are assumed to belong
to the City of Bozeman or MDT.
• MDT Structures – Tunnel portions under Main Street, I-90, and North Rouse Avenue.
19
• Railroad Bridge Crossings on Bozeman Creek and Mill Ditch - Assumed to be owned by the
Railroad.
• Other Private Crossings - Driveway bridges and portions of the tunnels on private property
without public easements. These structures are assumed to be owned by the property or
easement owners.
• City Owned Crossings – Bridges and structures within public right-of-way or within easements
specifically for city streets and alleys.
2.6 WATER/ENERGY/WASTE AUDITS
This section in the State of Montana PER template is not applicable to this study.
3 NEED FOR PROJECT
3.1 HEALTH, SANITATION, AND SECURITY
The health, sanitation, and security needs of the community can be further met through the
implementation of a comprehensive flood mitigation and stream restoration approach.
3.1.1 Health Risks
Flooding events pose significant safety risks to the public. In a study at the Water Research Laboratory at
the University of New South Wales prepared for the Australian National Flood Risk Advisory Group
(NFRAG) (Smith, Davey, & Cox, 2014), six flood hazard categories were developed based on flood depth
and velocity. The hazard categories are depicted in Figure 5.
20
Figure 5 - Flood Hazard Categories
Appendix B shows the flood hazard for the existing flood extents of Bozeman Creek during various flooding
events. During the design event, most of the flooding extent is characterized as Low Hazard, which is
generally safe for people, vehicles, and buildings. Some areas within the flood zone carry Medium Hazard
risk. This risk typically occurs near the channel corridor.
Any flooding can pose risks to infrastructure, including buildings, water supply, electricity, natural gas
systems, and communication systems. Disturbances to infrastructure can create public health risks.
Insufficient flood mitigation and lack of stream connectivity, as is present in Bozeman Creek, creates a
significant risk for environmental health. Flooding events can increase the amount of debris and
contamination in waterways, leading to the degradation of ecosystems. Additionally, lack of stream
connectivity creates adverse conditions for aquatic life.
3.1.2 Sanitation Risks
The risk posed to sanitary sewer creates the largest danger to sanitation. In a flood event, floodwater
could flow into the sanitary sewer infrastructure, forcing sewage into the floodplain. Historical documents
reporting on the flooding events of 1963 mention sewage backups.
21
The flooding extents coincide with industrial areas on the north side of the model boundary. Flooding in
these areas creates the risk of hazardous contaminants entering floodwaters, homes, and drinking water
supplies.
3.1.3 Security Risks to Critical Infrastructure
Floods can result in damage to emergency response infrastructure. Significant flooding of Bozeman Creek
may inundate a number of buildings that represent critical infrastructure to the City of Bozeman.
Preliminary modeling indicates that several key buildings, including a police station, fire station, Bozeman
City Hall, and Gallatin County Search and Rescue headquarters, may be fully or partially inundated with
flood water. In addition, buildings in the Gallatin County Fairgrounds may be inundated by flood waters.
These buildings are currently designated as an emergency shelter for displaced people.
In addition to emergency response facilities, flooding would block many of the main byways for the City.
As Bozeman Creek runs from south to north, overbank flow may split a large portion of the City of
Bozeman in half. In addition, flooding events could affect the structural stability of hydraulic structures on
Bozeman Creek and Mill Ditch. Specifically, sedimentation and erosion caused by large floods could
compromise hydraulic structures for a substantial time after flooding events.
3.2 AGING INFRASTRUCTURE
The old 420-feet long tunnel under Main Street (and the two historic downtown buildings that overlie the
tunnel) is the oldest hydraulic structure found on Bozeman Creek. The tunnel is at least 120 years old
(constructed in the late 1800s) and is the most vulnerable to failure by erosional undermining or by
plugging during a flood. Based on AESI inspections and scanning of this tunnel, there are several places
where the unreinforced masonry stream tunnel has already failed. Specifically, holes in the masonry
structure look directly into crawlspaces and basements of the adjacent building. The masonry debris has
created deltas within the stream channel in the tunnel itself.
Stabilization of the tunnels might include adding a concrete or masonry interior cover to the existing
structure or potentially constructing one or more smaller culverts inside the existing structures (e.g., slip-
lining the tunnel) and grouting the annulus between the new culverts and the existing tunnel structure.
Also, the inclusion of a large upstream trash rack would reduce the amount of debris that could traverse
the tunnel and lead to tunnel plugging.
Also, the historical significance of the tunnels may be an important consideration as well. The tunnels may
be eligible for the National Historic Register. Stabilization is expected to cost in the range of $1,500,000
to $2,500,000. Completing a stabilization repair could alleviate the probability of a catastrophic structural
failure of the tunnel structure.
As discussed later, even the newer tunnels in downtown Bozeman are old, undersized and at risk of failure.
The Mendenhall Street and Lamme Street bridges are of similar construction to the newer tunnels
(concrete with rectangular openings) and likely of similar age. All these structures need to be replaced or
supplemented with additional flow capacity.
The bridge for the Rouse and Peach Avenue crossings were replaced in 2018 as part of the MDT expansion
of Rouse Avenue from Main Street. The old railroad bridge structure that now acts as a pedestrian
underpass for Interstate 90 was built in 2011. This structure is modeled as “Story Mill Spur Bridge” in the
22
HEC-RAS model. Appendix B provides a summary of all of the HEC-RAS model simulations prepared for
this PER. These simulations are further discussed below.
3.2.1 Bozeman Creek Crossings
3.2.1.1 Upstream Crossings
Of all the modeled hydraulic structure crossings on Bozeman Creek, AESI’s models suggest that three
structures cause the most upstream flooding. Specifically, Story Street, a footbridge near South Church
Avenue, and a bridge for the Galligator Trail all create constrictions and overbank spill points. The smaller
structures have less hydraulic capacity than the Story Street crossing. However, the Galligator Trail (and
historic railroad) embankment is tall enough to act as a weir, leading excess inflow to become impounded
behind the Galligator Trail bridge. The impounded flow eventually passes through the structure to the
Story Street crossing. The terrain adjacent to the Story Street crossing does not allow for much storage
and instead diverts flows into the street. This flow travels eastward and westward on Story Street,
contributing to flooding in the model’s central and western areas. Simply upsizing the Story Street bridge
would eliminate a large part of the western floodplain, but may cause increased (induced) downstream
flooding.
3.2.1.2 Main Street Area Tunnels
The Rouse Avenue and Olive Street tunnel crossing, Babcock Street tunnel crossing, and Main Street
tunnel crossing are cause for concern. As discussed previously, the Main Street tunnel was built with the
development of the City of Bozeman itself. The structure’s age is apparent in its condition. Deterioration
and erosion are evident along many sections of the tunnels.
The Rouse Avenue and Olive Avenue tunnels are newer than the Main Street tunnel, with less signs of
deterioration and erosion. However, all three tunnels cannot pass the design flood flow. The Rouse
Avenue and Olive Avenue tunnel has a capacity of 637 cfs, the Babcock Street tunnel has a capacity of 528
cfs, and the Main Street tunnel has a capacity of 622 cfs, all much less than the design flood flow of 1,250
cfs.
The tunnels are also at risk of becoming plugged. Plugging can occur during high flow events when trees
or other debris block the entrance of a culvert or bridge. If the Main Street area tunnels were to plug
during a 100-year flood, flooding in the downtown area may increase beyond that shown in the existing
FEMA study.
3.2.1.3 Lamme Street Crossing
The Lamme Street bridge has the lowest hydraulic capacity among the hydraulic structures modeled along
Bozeman Creek. This is clearly demonstrated in the modeled flooding extents in the central area of the
model. The Lamme Street bridge has an estimated capacity of 237 cfs before overtopping.
This structure backs up water and causes flood flows to enter the streets. The majority of the overbank
flow created by this hydraulic structure travels east to Rouse Avenue. These flows then travel north down
Rouse Avenue. At the intersection of Peach Street and Rouse Avenue, water begins to leave the road and
inundate the surrounding structures. The Lamme Street bridge also causes some overbank flow to travel
northwest to Montana Avenue, where the flow also travels down the street and inundates structures.
23
3.2.2 Mill Ditch
3.2.2.1 Diversion Structure
In 2019, the intake structure for Mill Ditch was revised to remove an old Bozeman Creek head control
structure and add a 24-inch diameter automated water inlet. Per as-built documents prepared by
Morrison-Maierle, a rock-armored inlet with grate and turnout structure was installed to pipe flow to a
pump station at the base of Pete’s Hill on South Church Avenue. Flows from Bozeman Creek can enter the
existing Mill Ditch channel through this new inlet or an older inlet structure near the channel-spanning
structure on Bozeman Creek.
The prior head control system consisted of a concrete flume with a small bridge over it. During demolition,
the log supports and bridge structure were removed, but the concrete flume was left in place. The new
diversion system is not intended for mitigation of flood events and was not modeled as part of this report
since its capacity is insignificant relative to the flood flows evaluated in this study.
3.2.2.2 Galligator Trail Crossing East of Church Avenue
The Galligator Trail culvert crossing east of Church Avenue has a low hydraulic capacity of 131 cfs. If more
flow was diverted into the Mill Ditch channel, this crossing would need to be replaced or enlarged to
increase its hydraulic capacity. This would prevent flow from leaving the channel and traveling north down
Church Avenue, inundating structures downstream.
3.3 REASONABLE GROWTH
Each alternative was evaluated using standard FEMA flood return intervals to account for uncertainty in
hydrology. An additional design flow was added to refine the data for the 100-year event in order to
account for expected flow increases due to climate change. Of particular concern is the increased
potential for rapid late season snow accumulation in the basin followed by significant melt from rain on
snow. This phenomenon led to the recent (2022) 500-year flood on the Yellowstone River and many of its
tributaries in nearby Park County.
3.3.1 Population
As discussed previously, Bozeman is experiencing significant population growth (see previous discussion
regarding population growth). As population density increases within the Bozeman Creek corridor, some
additional flood damage may occur. However, the flood impacts from population density increases may
be offset to an extent by added flood detention requirements for new projects.
3.3.2 Climate Change
Climate change has begun to influence weather patterns, particularly extreme weather events around the
United States. More intense rainfall, earlier snow melt, and elevated groundwater tables have started to
affect the size of floods and their overall frequency of occurrence. In the Bozeman area, rain on snow
events in the spring are of particular interest. After some discussion with the City, it was decided to
increase the design flood to 1,250 cfs to account for future climate changes. AESI recognizes there is no
agreed upon scientific methodology to account for future environmental impacts, but concluded that
providing a factor of safety above the 100-year flow was a reasonable compromise.
24
Therefore, a design flow of 1,250 cfs was used for development of various alternatives as outlined in this
report, providing a safeguard above the effective 1% AEP event (100-year) flood flow of 1,052 cfs. Also,
all project alternative cost estimates were based upon providing 1,250 cfs of conveyance capacity.
4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
4.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The No Action Alternative (e.g., existing condition) provides insight into the costs that may be incurred if
no action is taken along the existing Bozeman Creek corridor. According to the new two-dimensional HEC-
RAS model simulations, at the 500-year flood event, up to 452 structures are impacted by flood waters.
These structures have an estimated total value, including contents, of more than one billion dollars. In
total, 375 structures are inundated during the 100-year flooding event with 367 of those experiencing
flooding more than 0.01 feet. Out of the 367 structures, 54 are inundated with water depths greater than
1 foot which would result in significant economic damage. Appendix B provides a summary figure that
depicts the extent of flooding during a 100-year flood event. Table 5 provides an overview of flood
statistics from the 500-year, 100-year, and 50-year floods if no action is taken.
Table 5 – Summary of Existing Condition Flood Data Flood Metrics 500-Year Flood 100-Year Flood 50-Year Flood
Average Inundation
Depth (ft)
0.68 0.51 0.46
Maximum Inundation
Depth (ft)
8.28 8.24 8.05
# Structures with
inundation depth > 1.0
feet
81 54 52
This existing condition numerical model was created using two-dimensional (2D) HEC-RAS simulation
software provided by the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, 2024). Creation of hydraulic structures,
channel bottom geometry, and Manning’s n values were taken directly from the Flood Insurance Study 1-
dimensional models created by Michael Baker in 2016 (Michael Baker International, 2015).
The channel bottom geometry was used in conjunction with 2018 LiDAR data provided by the City of
Bozeman to create the model terrain (City of Bozeman, 2018). The land use layer was modeled using 2019
National Land Cover Database (NLCD) data (United States Geological Survey, 2024). Building and stream
footprints were manually added to the 2019 NLCD data to finalize the land use layer. In addition to the
data provided from the 2016 Flood Insurance Study, more recent as-builts were used to model hydraulic
structures. The 2019 Sunset Hills Cemetery and Lindley Park Water Conservation Project as-builts by
Morrison Maierle were used to create the modeled Mill Ditch diversion structure. As built drawings
provided by DOWL were used to model the 2019 Rouse Avenue and East Peach Street crossings.
See Figure 6 below for the No Action Existing Condition Alternative overview. This figure depicts important
area features and key crossings. It also shows the extent of flooding during a 100-year flood event.
25
Figure 6 - No Action/Existing Condition Alternative Overview
Flooding inundation depth results from the model output were then used to determine the overall cost
of flood damage for the no-action conditions. For all alternatives, including no-action conditions, the
economic investigations followed guidance provided in the National Economic Development Procedures
Manual – Urban Flood Damage by the Institute for Water Resources (United States Army Corps of
Engineers, 1988).
Inundation depths were determined for each structure at each modeled event within the model area.
Points of inundation within the structure were delineated at the largest depth of inundation during the
26
100-year event. Depths were then analyzed against depth-damage relationships based on building type.
It should be noted that inundation depth versus percent damage curves or models are highly variable and
dependent upon the type of structures in the floodplain. For example, the value of a two-story commercial
building with a basement is much more highly valued than a one-story residential structure with no
basement. Consequently, the estimate of potential flood damage is biased by the damage model chosen.
For this PER study, a range of models was utilized to establish a “low” and “high” damage range. AESI
believes this is a reasonable approach for economic evaluations at the PER level of detail. Figure 7 depicts
three depth-damage models used for this study. Curve 1 (gray color) represents a single-story building
with a basement. Curve 2 (orange) represents a single-story residential building (with small crawl space
rather than full basement) assuming that once damage reaches 50%, the building is a total loss. Curve 3
(blue with red best fit line) represents a more conservative depth versus damage curve often used by
FEMA.
Figure 7 – Range of Depth-Damage Models Used for PER
Future studies should develop an actual building inventory for all 450+ buildings potentially within the
500-year floodplain. The inventory survey should include the actual first floor elevation, type of
construction, details on whether or not the building has a basement or crawlspace, and the building
purpose or potential contents. The actual first floor elevations for this study have been estimated using
LiDAR survey data which have an approximate vertical accuracy of +/- 0.5 feet. With a detailed inventory
in-hand, a variety of depth versus damage models could be employed more accurately in a building-by-
building summary.
Once corresponding damages were estimated for each structure inundation depth, damage-frequency
was calculated to evaluate damages in proportion to the probability of the event. The damage-frequency
27
curve permits the integration of all damage across an array of annual flood probabilities. This calculation
allowed the Expected Annual Damages (EAD) to be determined. The EAD was then aggregated over 50
years to estimate the present value of the flood damage using the appropriate annual interest discount
rate (currently 4.1%). The present value damages from the existing condition run were then compared to
the concomitant alternative results and the net reduction in flood damage was calculated. The reduction
in flood damages represents a portion of the “benefit stream” for any particular alternative. The overall
benefits are then compared to the overall costs to calculate net benefits and a benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR).
It should be noted that the final “high” damage estimates also assume commercial buildings have
basements. Detailed methodology and results concerning the economic investigation and use of depth
versus damage curves provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can be found in Appendix C.
The value of structures and land was estimated from Montana Cadastral, Realtor.com (Realtor.com,
2024), and Zillow.com (Zillow, 2024). AESI completed a side-by-side comparison of parcel values
presented in Cadastral, which are taxable values, and values presented in Realtor.com, which are based
upon actual sales data. The Realtor.com values were generally about 20% higher than the same taxable
value. Therefore, for cost estimating purposes, AESI used a conservative 25% markup of Cadastral value
to estimate any property/land acquisition costs for each of the alternatives. This 25% markup was not
used when estimating benefits, thus likely rendering those estimates to be somewhat conservative.
In addition, it appears that the property values in Montana Cadastral and Zillow do not consider any
devaluation of property for real estate within a floodplain. The encumbrance of a property being within a
floodplain would include the risk of damage from flooding and/or the cost of flood insurance, plus the
encumbrance of further development requiring a floodplain permit and/or meeting the stream setbacks.
In any case, it is presently assumed that these sources give only a general estimate of costs. Further
refinement of these costs using actual appraisals must be done in later design phases.
If no action is taken from existing conditions, the expected annual flood damage is estimated to cost within
a wide range of about $8.25 million dollars and $45 million dollars. Over the proposed 50-year project life
with a 4.10% Federal investment discount rate, the present value of annual damages is estimated to range
from a low value of about $174 million dollars to a high value of $953 million dollars. However, the FEMA
flood insurance program is in place to mitigate economic impacts of flood events along Bozeman Creek
such that “out-of-pocket” costs would be reduced.
4.2 ALTERNATIVE ONE – BOZEMAN CREEK CONVEYANCE ENHANCEMENT
4.2.1 Description
This alternative involves reconstructing the Bozeman Creek corridor to convey the design flow of 1,250
cfs. To pass the design flow and minimize flooding extents, the Bozeman Creek channel must be expanded
to provide additional conveyance capacity. Additionally, all hydraulic structure crossings would also
require upsizing to provide adequate hydraulic capacity. Alternative One includes the following
improvements:
• 2.13-mile-long stretch of creek from Church Avenue to Gold Avenue with 1.93 miles of the existing
stream graded and widened/deepened to convey the design flood and to restore the stream and
floodplain into a more natural configuration;
• Channel bottom width ranging from 20 to 26 feet;
• Channel side slopes of 2.5H:1V;
28
• 18 hydraulic structures, bridges, or tunnels modified or replaced;
• Real estate acquisition requirements of about 4.4 acres focused upon the needed channel stream
right-of-way;
• Three buildings to be removed;
• Bank protection including riprap, natural vegetation, and some shoring/cribs; and,
• Stream/floodplain restoration including natural vegetation, habitat, and a trail.
Appendix I provides detailed figures depicting the features and extent of each alternative. Figure 8
provides a typical channel section for Alternative One. Note that this typical channel section is a
“simplified cartoon” for purposes of analyzing the cost and extents of work required to convey the design
flood. Actual cross-sections would vary in accordance with the available right-of-way and numerous other
factors that would be considered in detailed design of the alternative. Although the typical section for this
alternative is the same as for Alternative Two, this alternative differs from Alternative Two in that it is a
stream restoration project with a year-round perennial flow and a channel that will vary along its length.
The restoration would include trails, wetlands, and vegetation such as trees and brush where space is
available. Also, the steeper channel grade as compared to other alternatives (e.g., Alt Two) allows the
section to convey more flood water in a smaller cross section.
Under Alternative One, a typical bridge or culvert replacement assumes installation of two 14-foot X 8-
foot concrete box culverts with length as required for each crossing. These structures were also used for
developing the alternative cost estimate.
Figure 8 – Typical Section for Alternative One
While the channel cross-section and grade will likely vary considerably along the length of the project to
accommodate localized conditions and utilize available space, for the purposes of this evaluation, a simple
channel cross-section was chosen. In particular, the assumed cross-section is a trapezoidal channel with
a flat bottom (with low-flow channel) and 2.5H:1V side slopes. In some areas along the channel, rock
armoring may be required. Channel bottom widths vary from 20 to 26 feet with depths ranging from 5 to
29
7 feet. The average slope of the proposed channel is 1.07 percent. A meandering, low-flow channel would
be set in the channel bottom to foster aquatic organism passage and habitat during low flows and to
minimize excessive ice formation with a higher depth-to-width ratio during low winter flows.
For this alternative, the model assumes that all structures will pass the design flow without any
overtopping and minimal constriction of the new channel. The structures could be reconstructed in one
of three manners: removed and replaced, removed completely (e.g., replaced with an open channel
section), or left in place with additional capacity provided near the original structure (through the
supplement of an additional hydraulic structure). For the purposes of the model, structures were assumed
to be removed and replaced including the downtown tunnels. This alternative also proposes to remove
the buildings over the tunnels to create an open-air channel with box culverts at the road crossings.
An optional addition to Alternative One is an elevated 6-foot-wide gravel trail within the channel banks.
This will provide additional connectivity to existing trails and parks in the downtown area. The flood
metrics for Alternative One for the 500-year, 100-year, and 50-year floods are shown in Table 6. This table
also depicts the number of structures where new or worsened flooding was observed based upon the
modeling results. Induced flooding essentially captures where flooding is made worse by a project
alternative as compared to the No Action (existing condition) scenario. This “induced flooding” metric is
an important final design consideration once an alternative is selected after the proposed public
involvement process. Often the induced flooding can be reduced or eliminated altogether by careful
design optimization. AESI expects that any induced flooding from Alternative One could be minimized or
eliminated entirely during detailed modeling and design.
Table 6 – Summary of Alternative One Flood Data
Flood Metrics 500-Year Flood 100-Year Flood 50-Year Flood
Average Inundation
Depth (ft)
0.12 0.08 0.06
Maximum Inundation
Depth (ft)
4.81 4.03 3.64
# Structures with
inundation depth > 1.0
feet
20 16 11
# Structures with
Induced Flood Damage
21 20 10
4.2.2 Design Criteria
For all alternatives, AESI simulated the same range of stochastic flood events for the purposes of a side-
by-side comparison and computation of flood damage reduction (e.g., 500-, 100-, 50-, 25-, and 10-year
floods & the design flood). This project utilizes HEC-RAS version 6.6 2D modeling software (USACE, 2024)
to create all 2D floodplain models.
AutoCAD Civil 3D (Autodesk, 2022) was used to create the proposed channel for all alternatives. The
channel bottom geometry, created using AutoCAD Civil 3D, was overlayed with the existing LiDAR data to
create the design terrain. The land use data from the no-action conditions was also adjusted to reflect the
increased channel footprint and any removed buildings. The proposed channel bottom width was iterated
until flooding extents were minimized.
30
The design intent of this alternative is to provide a natural-looking channel that would pass the design
flow without damage through the city. The simplified channel utilized for this analysis resulted in some
induced flooding, which was included in the economic analysis of this option. However, since the design
objective is to convey the design flow through the city without induced flooding, the actual final design
should be adjusted as needed to improve on this metric. This may have some additional costs, but these
would likely be outweighed by the reduced flood damage that would improve the overall economics of
this option.
For simplicity in the hydraulic model, all hydraulic structures, except for the I-90 and Gold Avenue
structures, were removed from the HEC-RAS model and replaced with open channel sections. It is
assumed that hydraulic structures will be reconstructed in a way that will not constrict the flow in any
way, as if no structure were present. The Interstate hydraulic structures were left as is for the hydraulic
modeling. The Gold Avenue hydraulic structure is downstream of the Interstate crossing and was
therefore left in place, as well. These two structures are the cause of some of the induced flooding
observed in the evaluation.
All footbridges were designed as 10-foot-wide steel pedestrian bridges. A single box culvert system and
size was selected for all other hydraulic crossings to provide a preliminary cost estimate for the new
alternative crossings. Using the HY-8 modeling program, two 14-foot x 8-foot box culverts were selected
with a combined hydraulic conveyance capacity of about 1,300 cfs.
4.2.3 Map
Figure 9 shows Alternative One along with the proposed channel area and hydraulic structures, as well as
the estimated extent of flooding during the 100-year flood event.
31
Figure 9 - Alternative One Overview
4.2.4 Environmental Impacts
Impacts from this project include temporary large-scale bed and bank grading and demolition near the
creek to remove the hydraulic structures and buildings. Since this is a stream restoration project, the final
configuration would have positive environmental impacts including flood mitigation, habitat
enhancement, aesthetic improvements, and room for storm drainage treatment; however, temporary
construction impacts will be considerable including the removal or relocation of multiple mature trees.
This large project would involve construction over years with much of the construction of the channel
work occurring during low flow periods. Temporary downstream sediment concerns during construction
should be addressed with the use of best management practices and construction scheduling. As stated
previously, the majority of Bozeman Creek has lost its natural channel shape and consists mostly of a
32
narrow channel with armored banks. While the short-term destruction of the stream during construction
will create risk, the long-term benefits of increasing its current size and capacity should exceed the risk.
In addition to reducing future flood damage, having a larger channel area will allow for additional
restoration and vegetation features to create a better aquatic habitat.
Several optional restoration measures are included in the cost estimate. Rock weirs and log vanes can
help mitigate high velocities by creating a pool-riffle sequence in the channel. The pools created by these
features provide aquatic species resting areas during upstream travel. Placement of wetland soil is also
included as an optional item. Wetland soil is a low-oxygen, hydrated soil that supports the regeneration
of native wetland vegetation. Tree and shrub planting is an additional optional item. Planting trees and
woody brush will help foster the existing flora, providing habitat for terrestrial species, but will also require
some additional channel width to maintain conveyance capacity where space is available. Cost estimates
include these costs since mitigation of wetlands that are lost and/or removal of mature trees is expected.
4.2.5 Land Requirements
To allow for the necessary channel expansion and hydraulic structure replacement, 4.4 acres of land and
three buildings will need to be acquired. It should be noted that the land acquisition estimate is based
upon providing space for the proposed new channel section and an allowance for construction access.
Final design and optimization will be needed to minimize the need for any additional property acquisition.
For the cost estimate, real estate acquisition cost is estimated to be $19.2 million. Furthermore, legal fees
are estimated to add an additional 20% or $3.8 million to the total real estate cost.
If this option were to be fully implemented, three buildings would need to be acquired and demolished
to allow for the daylighting of Bozeman Creek where the current tunnels exist. The first building is located
at 316 Babcock Street and currently home to Bozeman Creek Family Health. Two buildings on Main Street
will also need to be demolished – 312 E. Main Street (home to Nova Café) and 311 E. Main Street (home
to Bar Nine). The existing “Eagles Club” building located east of Nova Café can likely be protected and
underpinned and therefore may not be necessary for acquisition.
There is a possibility that the tunnels could be stabilized and enlarged or widened without removal of the
buildings provided they can be safely underpinned to stabilize their foundations. The structural evaluation
of feasibility of tunnel widening were outside the scope of this PER but should be considered during final
design and planning.
An optional commuter trail within the channel is proposed from the Galligator Trail footbridge to the
railroad bridge north of Birch Street. This trail would be built as a 6-foot-wide gravel trail that is high
enough to avoid the 10-year flooding event but would be submerged for larger, less frequent flood events.
The current proposed channel section for Alternative One can accommodate the recreational trail without
sacrificing conveyance capacity.
A spur trail connecting the railroad crossing to the existing Story Mill Spur Trail is also proposed. This trail
is proposed as a 6-foot-wide gravel trail. Additional real estate acquisition was added as an optional item
to Alternative One to account for the real estate needed for the spur trail.
A comprehensive overview of the proposed commuter trails for all alternatives can be found in Appendix
I.
33
4.2.6 Potential Construction Problems
Like most downtown corridors, buildings along Bozeman’s Main Street are built with minimal to no
setbacks between one another. Because the construction of Alternative One requires the removal of three
downtown buildings, concerns arise around the structural integrity of the surrounding buildings.
Furthermore, erosion from the waterway could continue to affect structural integrity. Shoring and
cribbing for lateral support have been included as a line item in the cost estimate to mitigate this concern.
Another area of concern is construction access. Given the high population density of the project area, it is
possible that additional real estate may need to be temporarily acquired to provide construction access
for large equipment. The channel length between Rouse Avenue and Tamarack Street crossing is a specific
area of concern for construction access since Bozeman Creek travels entirely through private property at
this location. Alternatively, a contractor may be forced to work upstream to downstream or vice versa
during construction to minimize the need for work areas.
4.2.7 Sustainability Considerations
Alternative One addresses the sustainability of the Bozeman Creek flood conveyance infrastructure. Large
flooding events on Bozeman Creek may cause damage to current infrastructure along the corridor. Even
lower intensity, but more frequent floods could cause damage. The intent of Alternative One is to replace
existing hydraulic structures and increase capacity, minimizing the potential for damage during floods.
Replacement of existing structures will increase their lifespan when compared to the No Action
Alternative.
Alternative One also includes riprap armoring, natural erosion protection features, and hydraulic seeding
items intended to minimize/prevent bank erosion. Currently, the lack of proper hydraulic conveyance
both along the stream and through hydraulic structures has the potential to cause significant erosional
damage to private property.
Even without the impact of floods, all existing hydraulic structures will require eventual maintenance or
replacement including the downtown tunnels. When hydraulic structures require replacement, they
should be sized to accommodate the flows modeled in this report.
Other aspects of sustainability that this project addresses are habitat restoration and reduced flood
damage. These environmental aspects are described in detail in section 4.2.4.
4.2.8 Cost Estimate
The total estimated cost for Alternative One (including land acquisition) is $79,702,735. The detailed cost
estimate for Alternative One is found in Appendix C. This estimate includes a 75% contingency. A high
contingency was applied given no detailed design has yet been completed and takes into consideration
the escalating real estate values in Gallatin County.
Operation and maintenance costs are included as part of the cost estimate at 0.25% of construction costs
per year (with a 50-year project life cycle), or about 5.3% of the total construction cost in present value
terms. However, this cost is estimated to be less than the current operation and maintenance costs.
Proper flood mitigation decreases street flooding, sediment impoundment, hydraulic structure plugging,
and other events that require regular maintenance, thereby decreasing costs.
The optional features for this alternative (e.g., trail, plantings, low flow channel) have an estimated cost
of $600,000 or about 0.90% of the total construction cost. These optional features provide a high return
34
on investment, given their comparable low cost. Without these optional features, the project would
primarily provide flood control.
Alternative One is perhaps the most effective alternative for flood mitigation purposes with considerably
reduced annual flood damages. At the 100-year event, the number of structures inundated by more than
0.01 feet of water would be reduced to 27 structures compared to 367 structures currently. Over the
proposed 50-year project life with a 4.10% interest rate (the current Federal discount rate), the present
value of annual damages is estimated to range from a low value of about $17 million dollars to a high
value of $587 million dollars.
The economic analysis for Alternative One includes an estimate of annual expected flood damages
($1,000s), damages avoided (or scenario benefits), maintenance costs, net economic benefits, and
benefit-to-cost ratio. These results are summarized in Table 7 and provide a Low Range and a High Range
estimate for the net benefits and benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR). It should be noted that the BCR is estimated
by taking the present value of flood damages prevented by the alternative (called the “Scenario Benefits”)
and dividing by the sum of the project first costs and the present value of annual maintenance. The net
benefits are estimated by taking the scenario benefits minus the sum of the project first costs and the
present value of annual maintenance.
Table 7 - Alternative One Economic Analysis
4.3 ALTERNATIVE TWO – MILL DITCH DESIGN FLOOD MITIGATION
4.3.1 Description
This alternative increases the bypass capacity of Mill Ditch and thereby reduces the flow in Bozeman Creek
during a flood event. Currently, two diversions are located at the upstream end of Mill Ditch from
Bozeman Creek. In the newest existing diversion, a motor-controlled inlet provides water for the City’s
irrigation system. The older diversion is located just downstream of this inlet. The old diversion consisted
of a concrete head control structure with log stops and a culvert that directed water into the Mill Ditch.
In 2019, the active inlet was constructed. As part of this project, the head control structure was partially
demolished, removing the supports for log stops, in addition to a small walking bridge that spanned the
structure.
Alternative Two proposes to create a larger diversion structure and channel, allowing higher flows along
the Mill Ditch route. The Mill Ditch channel extending from the Bozeman Creek diversion to the crossing
with Burlington Northern Sante Fe (BNSF) Railroad would be enlarged to handle the increase in flows. This
includes the replacement of the hydraulic structures along the Mill Ditch reach. This improvement reach
did not include the Burlington Northern Railroad, Cedar Street, I-90, or Bohart Road crossings due to the
project’s original scope constraints.
Expected
Annual
Damages
($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Damages
($1,000s)
Scenario
Benefits
($1,000s)
Project
First Costs
($1,000s)
Present Value of
Maintenance
Costs ($1,000s)
Net
Benefits
($1,000s)
Benefit
-Cost
Ratio
LOW $818 $17,285 $156,952 $79,703 $4,208 $73,041 1.9
HIGH $27,835 $587,851 $365,581 $79,703 $4,208 $281,670 4.4
35
The analyzed bypass flow for Mill Ditch during the design event was estimated to be up to 823 cfs of flood
flow while Bozeman Creek could carry 427 cfs of the 1,250 cfs total design flow. The flatter gradient of
the Mill Ditch alignment is less than the natural Bozeman Creek alignment so a typical ditch cross section
generally identical to the reclaimed Bozeman Creek (Alternative One) cross section would only carry about
66% of the design flow.
Alternative Two includes the following elements:
• A diversion dam and flow constrictor culvert on Bozeman Creek to force flood flows into the Mill
Ditch bypass route;
• 1.72-mile-long flood bypass ditch from Church Avenue to Gold Avenue with 1.11 miles of the
existing ditch graded and greatly widened/deepened;
• Channel bottom width ranging from 22 to 26 feet, top width 50 to 60 feet, depth 5 to 7 feet;
• Channel side slopes of 2.5H:1V with rock armoring as needed;
• Stabilization of the three downtown tunnels;
• 12 hydraulic structures or bridges modified or replaced;
• Real estate acquisition requirements of about 2.86 acres;
• One building (Town Pump) to be removed; and,
• Bank protection utilizing riprap, low (grass) vegetation, and some shoring/cribs.
Figure 10 provides a typical channel section for Alternative Two. This channel section is similar to the
Alternative One channel with the exception that the Mill Ditch flood channel would not be constructed as
a natural stream since it would only carry limited regulatory irrigation flows during part of the year under
non-flood circumstances. The regulatory irrigation flows could be carried within the proposed low flow
channel depicted on Figure 10. The vegetation in the enlarged Mill Creek Ditch would be grass or possibly
wetland species where the bottom of the ditch encounters groundwater. The 2.5H:1V side slopes would
be some combination of grass or armor stone where additional erosion protection was needed. A trail or
other optional amenities could be included.
Figure 10 – Typical Section for Alternative Two
36
Typical bridge or culvert replacement assumes installation of one 20-foot X 8-foot concrete box culvert
with length as required for each crossing. These structures were also assumed during the development of
the alternative cost estimate. Note that no “optional” trail is shown for this typical section since a majority
of the channel bottom could be configured as a trail given the channel will be dry for much of the year.
4.3.2 Design Criteria
Under this alternative, the objective is to pass moderate flood flow down the existing Bozeman Creek
corridor while bypassing a majority of the flood flow down the improved Mill Ditch alignment. The existing
Bozeman Creek corridor would mostly remain as-is, while Mill Ditch would be the focus of conveyance
improvements.
The proposed capacity for the new corridor was targeted to convey about 825 cfs during the design event.
Model simulations confirmed that the improved Mill Ditch would convey about 823 cfs. The design flood
remainder (e.g., 427 cfs) would then be conveyed down Bozeman Creek during the design event. Under
this alternative, no improvements to hydraulic structures along Bozeman Creek are proposed. The
proposed Mill Ditch channel would have 2.5H:1V side slopes and a channel bottom ranging from 22 to 26
feet which is somewhat wider than that proposed under Alternative One. The channel depth is estimated
to vary from 5 to 7 feet along the proposed alignment of Mill Ditch during the design event. Adding
additional capacity to Mill Ditch will result in encroaching on the steep slopes of Peet’s Hill. This would
have to be evaluated by engineers more carefully during detailed design and may require installation of
slope stabilization or a retaining wall along a 1,500- to 2,000-foot section of new flood channel. For the
PER cost estimate, a $5,000,000 placeholder cost has been included in this evaluation for the slope
stabilization/retaining wall.
The flood metrics for Alternative Two for the 500-year, 100-year, and 50-year floods are provided in Table
8. This table also depicts the number of structures where new or worsened flooding was observed based
on the modeling results. This “induced flooding” metric is an important final design consideration once an
alternative is selected following the proposed public involvement process. As previously discussed,
induced flooding can likely be minimized during detailed design and optimization; however, please note
that the induced flooding observed as part of Alternative Two is flooding of new buildings and properties
along the proposed Mill Ditch improved channel. Many of these residents or business owners are not
currently subject to a significant flood risk since the flood risk is presently concentrated to areas along
Bozeman Creek.
Table 8 – Summary of Alternative Two Flood Data
Flood Metrics 500-Year Flood 100-Year Flood 50-Year Flood
Average Inundation
Depth (ft)
0.31 0.07 0.03
Maximum Inundation
Depth (ft)
5.19 3.25 2.91
# Structures with
inundation depth > 1.0
feet
40 12 6
# Structures with
Induced Flood Damage
34 9 7
37
AutoCAD Civil 3D was used in conjunction with the existing LiDAR data to iterate the model terrain. Mill
Ditch hydraulic structures from the diversion to the furthest downstream railroad crossing were removed
for the model. All hydraulic structures on Bozeman Creek were modeled in their existing conditions.
Recognize that the risk of eventual failure of the older hydraulic structures along Bozeman Creek is not
accounted for in the economic evaluation.
To adequately divert the design flow into Mill Ditch, a weir diversion structure was added to the terrain
in Bozeman Creek. This allows water to become ponded and forced into the Mill Ditch channel. Further
design is needed to address the details of the diversion structure and to minimize upstream flood impacts
that might result. It is likely that an effective flood diversion structure may have to span the entire width
of the Bozeman Creek floodplain at the diversion.
The inherent instability of flood diversions is an issue with all flood bypass options. The issue is related to
the potential for plugging or obstruction of either the Bozeman Creek channel or the Mill Ditch bypass
channel with flood debris or sediment. The inherent problem is that the split flow and the flatter gradient
of Mill Ditch could not convey sediment or debris as effectively as a single channel. Therefore, if one
channel or the other becomes partially plugged, the other channel may be subjected to excess flows. In
this case, if the Mill Ditch bypass channel becomes plugged, additional flooding along the Bozeman Creek
corridor, beyond that shown in the model simulations, would occur. If the Bozeman Creek channel
becomes plugged, additional flow down the Mill Ditch bypass channel could also cause flooding beyond
what is shown in the model simulations along the ditch alignment. This could be particularly problematic
given that many of the local residents and business owners in this reach are not currently subject to any
flood risks. The potential for plugging will need to be evaluated closely during final design if this is the
selected Alternative.
All pedestrian bridges removed along Mill Ditch are proposed to be replaced with a 10-foot-wide steel
pedestrian bridge. HY-8 was used to size the remaining crossings. These crossings are proposed to be
replaced with a 20-foot x 8-foot box culvert with a capacity of 1,010 cfs. This conveyance capacity is
greater than the minimum required and therefore could be reduced further during future design
optimization.
All hydraulic structures along Bozeman Creek are scheduled to remain under this alternative with the
exception that we have included a cost estimate to structurally stabilize the three downtown tunnels.
4.3.3 Map
Figure 11 provides an overview of Alternative Two and the anticipated extent of flooding remaining at the
100-year flood event.
38
Figure 11 - Alternative Two Overview
4.3.4 Environmental Impacts
Mill Ditch was originally constructed as a waterway for irrigation and to power the water wheel at the
historic Story Mill. The Mill Ditch currently only conveys periodic irrigation flows to users downstream.
Alternative Two would also divert flood flows into this channel, thereby separating the floodplain while
lowering the flooding potential along Bozeman Creek proper. This alternative will increase flooding risk
along Mill Ditch by direct overflow and possibly by inducing higher groundwater levels in this area which
might impact building crawlspaces or basements. These potential impacts have not been evaluated in
detail, and any potential damage is not included in the current economic evaluation.
Wetlands are also a concern along Mill Ditch. The diversion from Bozeman Creek to Mill Ditch is located
within a wetland area. The large and relatively deep flood channel in this area may impact (drain) existing
39
wetlands. However, these impacts could potentially be mitigated by designing wetlands into the ditch
bottom that would be fed at least seasonally by shallow ground water in the area. AESI did not evaluate
the costs or possible environmental/water right permitting issues associated with this potential issue. The
downstream end of the Mill Ditch also drains into a large wetland area. If not adequately mitigated,
construction activities can pose sedimentation and other risks to these wetland areas. However, the
increased flow in the direction of these wetlands could also foster their development/improvement. The
details of routing flood flows into these wetlands is an optional item that should be more closely
considered and developed in further design of any flood bypass option.
The Mill Ditch alignment also traverses through a historic commercial and industrial area that may have
some environmental contamination issues based upon AESI past experience working in the area. For
example, the Bozeman Library site was a rail yard and from 1953 to 1973 it was reportedly utilized as an
asbestos ore loading depot by CMC. Beginning in 1965 and up until 1988, a salvage and recycling business
was also operated at the site. This history necessitated an extensive asbestos removal action under the
library building as part of that development effort. Similar environmental issues are possible but are not
accounted for in the economic analysis.
4.3.5 Land Requirements
To allow for the necessary channel expansion and hydraulic structure replacements, 2.86 acres of land
and one building will need to be acquired. Real estate acquisition cost is estimated to be $7.7 million.
Legal fees are estimated to add an additional 20% or $1.5 million to the total real estate cost.
For the purposes of the economic analysis, it is assumed that one building will need to be acquired and
demolished along Mill Ditch. Specifically, the Town Pump building located at 803 East Main Street is
located on top of Mill Ditch. Mill Ditch reinforced concrete culverts run under Main Street and the Town
Pump property for about 320 feet. For purposes of this report, it was assumed that the Town Pump would
be demolished to allow room for Mill Ditch, however, there is some chance that a suitable box culvert
(20-foot wide) could be constructed that bypasses the building, pumps, and underground tanks. More
detailed design (outside the current PER scope of work) would need to be completed to better assess how
to convey flood flows through this area.
Additional real estate acquisition was added as an optional item to Alternative Two to meet the objective
of increased recreational access along the Mill Ditch corridor. These proposed trails would connect to
existing portions of the area trail system. For instance, a 6-foot-wide trail, including a pedestrian
underpass underneath Main Street, connected to the existing Galligator trail is proposed. Also, an 8-foot-
wide trail connecting Main Street to Village Downtown Boulevard is proposed. Finally, another proposed
trail section would connect Village Downtown Boulevard to the Simkins-Hallin access road near Front
Street.
4.3.6 Potential Construction Problems
As with Alterative One, additional real estate may need to be acquired to provide construction access. The
channel length following the railroad between Village Downtown Boulevard and the Simkins-Hallins
access road is a specific area of concern for construction access, as Mill Ditch travels entirely through
private property with no road access. Access rights and a potential public trail easement would need to
be obtained from the landowner(s). In addition and as previously discussed, the channel cut section along
Peet’s Hill may require significant slope stabilization or a retaining wall 1,500 to 2,000 feet long.
40
4.3.7 Sustainability Considerations
Alternative Two proposes replacement of 12 hydraulic structures along Mill Ditch. Replacing these
structures will increase the conveyance capacity along Mill Ditch and meet the required design flows.
This alternative will decrease the extent of flooding along Bozeman Creek, in turn diminishing the
environmental hazard of flooding events. Overall, it is not as effective in mitigating the downtown flood
hazard as Alternative One and also introduces a new flood hazard / floodplain along the proposed bypass
route. There is also a significant degree of channel grading, walls, and berms that may be needed as part
of this alternative.
The channel grading of Mill Ditch will include rock armoring and seeding similar to Alternative One. These
items will provide erosion protection to the channel banks and reduce sediment loads from bank erosion
during high flow events, providing some environmental benefits.
4.3.8 Cost Estimate
The total estimated cost for Alternative Two is $50,771,018. The detailed cost estimate for Alternative
Two is found in Appendix C. This estimate includes a 75% contingency. A high contingency was applied
given no detailed design has yet been completed and takes into consideration the escalating real estate
values in Gallatin County.
The optional features (e.g., trails, recreational underpass, plantings, wetlands) included in this alternative
add an estimated cost of $451,700 or about 1.1% to the total construction cost.
Operation and maintenance costs are included as part of the cost estimate at 0.25% of construction costs
per year (with a 50-year project life cycle), or 5.3% of the total construction cost. However, this cost is
estimated to be less than the current operation and maintenance costs from flooding along the Bozeman
Creek corridor. Proper flood mitigation decreases street flooding, sediment impoundment, hydraulic
structure plugging, and other events that require regular maintenance, thereby decreasing costs.
If Alternative Two is chosen, the expected annual flood damage is expected to be reduced considerably.
At the 100-year event, the number of structures inundated by more than 0.01 feet of water is reduced to
45 structures compared to 367 structures under the existing condition. Over the proposed 50-year project
life with a 4.10% interest rate, the present value of annual damages is estimated to range from a low value
of about $12 million dollars to a high value of $566 million dollars.
The economic analysis results for Alternative Two are summarized in Table 9.
Table 9 - Alternative Two Economic Analysis
Expected
Annual
Damages
($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Damages
($1,000s)
Scenario
Benefits
($1,000s)
Project First
Costs ($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Mainten
ance
Costs
($1,000s)
Net
Benefits
($1,000s)
Benefit-
Cost
Ratio
LOW $579 $12,228 $162,009 $50,771 $2,681 $108,558 3.0
HIGH $26,816 $566,316 $387,116 $50,771 $2,681 $333,665 7.2
41
4.4 ALTERNATIVE THREE – BOZEMAN CREEK HYDRAULIC CROSSING REPLACEMENT &
TUNNELS STABILIZATION
4.4.1 Description
Alternative Three increases conveyance down the Bozeman Creek channel by replacing all hydraulic
structures along the creek apart from the three downtown tunnels. There is also no channel grading
between these structures (beyond light grading at each installation). Unlike Alternatives One and Two,
Alternative Three also includes the replacement of hydraulic structures under the I-90 corridor. This
alternative was introduced later in the PER process at the City of Bozeman’s request since by that time, it
was recognized that the I-90 corridor hydraulic conveyance was an important consideration. It is assumed
that each structure will be replaced to pass the design flow without overbank flow. However, in some
areas, the channel itself is the limiting factor in the conveyance of flood flows.
The goal of this alternative is to reduce land acquisition and large-scale grading that is needed to
reconstruct the channel through the city as well as to eliminate property acquisition downtown. In the
downtown area, the tunnels will be stabilized rather than removed or improved. Therefore, the cost
estimate reflects the stabilization of the tunnels and leaving the downtown buildings in place.
Alternative Three includes the following elements:
• 2.13-mile-long stretch from Church Avenue to Gold Avenue with grading only at the structures
replaced;
• the replacement of hydraulic structures under the Interstate-90 corridor;
• Channel side slopes approaching structures of 2.5H:1V;
• Stabilization of the three downtown tunnels;
• 17 hydraulic structures, bridges, or tunnels modified or replaced (including the replacement of
hydraulic structures under the Interstate-90 corridor as noted above);
• Real estate acquisition required of about 0.35 acres; and,
• Bank protection utilizing riprap, natural vegetation, and some shoring/cribs.
Figure 10 (shown previously) provides a typical channel section for Alternative Two which is also
applicable to the channel grading at structures envisioned as part of Alternative Three. Typical bridge or
culvert replacement assumes installation of two 14-foot X 8-foot concrete box culverts with length as
required for each crossing.
If chosen, Alternative Three may be best implemented by starting at the downstream end and working
upstream (south) to limit the potential for induced flooding.
4.4.2 Design Criteria
One goal of Alternative Three is to reduce the land acquisition and grading costs that would be required
as part of Alternative One. This alternative also includes additional conveyance capacity through I-90
which is a potential element of any flood mitigation project in Bozeman. Under this alternative and for
the model simulations, all hydraulic structures (apart from the three downtown tunnels) that cannot
convey the design flood were removed and replaced with channel cuts that can convey the design flood
(1,250 cfs). During final design, these channel cuts (in the model) will be replaced as required with
appropriately designed hydraulic structures capable of passing the design flood.
42
The flood metrics for Alternative Three for the 500-year, 100-year, and 50-year floods are provided in
Table 10. This table also depicts the number of structures where new or worsened flooding was observed
based on the modeling results. This “induced flooding” metric is an important final design consideration
once an alternative is selected. As discussed previously, final design and optimization may enable any
induced flooding to be minimized. However, under this alternative it may not be possible to eliminate all
induced flooding without further channel conveyance improvements.
Table 10 – Summary of Alternative Three Flood Data
Flood Metrics 500-Year Flood 100-Year Flood 50-Year Flood
Average Inundation
Depth (ft)
0.67 0.42 0.30
Maximum Inundation
Depth (ft)
8.55 7.55 7.02
# Structures with
inundation depth > 1.0
feet
61 25 18
# Structures with
Induced Flood Damage
219 186 144
4.4.3 Map
Figure 12 provides an overview of the proposed hydraulic structure replacements and the extent of
flooding predicted for the 100-year flood event.
43
Figure 12 - Alternative Three Overview
44
4.4.4 Environmental Impacts
This alternative reduces the estimated damage during a flood event in comparison to the No Action
Alternative but not to the extent of Alternatives One, Two or Four (discussed in the next report section).
However, this alternative eliminates reconstruction of the entire channel length, saving on land
acquisition and grading as well as property acquisition in the downtown area. The disadvantage is there
would be no improvements to the channel beyond some localized work near each of the hydraulic
structures scheduled for replacement.
4.4.5 Land Requirements
To allow for hydraulic structure replacement, 0.35 acres of land will need to be acquired. Real estate
acquisition costs are estimated to be $3.78 million. Furthermore, legal fees are estimated to add an
additional 20% or $0.76 million to the total real estate cost.
The cost estimate and economic analysis for this alternative include the stabilization (but not enlarging)
of the three downtown tunnels with no downtown property acquisition.
4.4.6 Potential Construction Problems
Like most downtown corridors, buildings along Bozeman’s Main Street are built with minimal to no
setbacks between one another. Furthermore, erosion from the waterway could continue to affect
structural integrity. Shoring and cribbing for lateral support have been included as a line item in the cost
estimate to mitigate this concern.
Another area of concern is construction access. Given the dense population in the project area, it is
possible that additional real estate may need to be acquired temporarily to provide construction access
for large equipment. To permit efficient access to replace the various undersized structures, a contractor
may be forced to work upstream to downstream within the stream corridor itself or vice versa during
construction to minimize the need for work areas.
4.4.7 Sustainability Considerations
Alternative Three addresses the undersized structures found along Bozeman Creek (with the exception of
the downtown tunnels). The life span of the downtown tunnel structures would increase if the tunnels
are stabilized and the risk of failure during a flood would decrease.
The elimination of channel work provides some risk regarding bank protection and environmental
impacts. Any inadequacies in the current bank protection system could cause damage to private property
and increase maintenance costs. Environmental features are not included under Alternative Three limiting
the benefit that the project could provide to surrounding habitat.
4.4.8 Cost Estimate
The total estimated cost for Alternative Three is $35,193,273. The detailed cost estimate for Alternative
Four is found in Appendix C. This estimate includes a 75% contingency. A high contingency was applied
given no detailed design has yet been completed and takes into consideration the escalating real estate
values in Gallatin County.
Operation and maintenance costs are included as part of the cost estimate at 0.25% of construction costs
per year (with a 50-year project life cycle), or 5.3% of the total construction present worth value. However,
this cost is estimated to be less than the current operation and maintenance costs. Proper flood mitigation
45
decreases street flooding, sediment impoundment, hydraulic structure plugging, and other events that
require regular maintenance, thereby decreasing costs.
If Alternative Three is selected by the City, the expected annual flood damage is expected to be reduced
marginally. At the 100-year event, the number of structures inundated by more than 0.01 feet of water
would be reduced to 307 structures compared to 367 structures under the existing condition. Over the
proposed 50-year project life with a 4.10% interest rate, the present value of annual damages is estimated
to range from a low value of about $105 million to a high value of $796 million. Note however that there
still is a positive benefit-cost ratio.
Table 11 summarizes the results from the economic analysis for Alternative Three.
Table 11 - Alternative Three Economic Analysis
Expected
Annual
Damages
($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Damages
($1,000s)
Scenario
Benefits
($1,000s)
Project First
Costs ($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Mainten
ance
Costs
($1,000s)
Net
Benefits
($1,000s)
Benefit-
Cost
Ratio
LOW $4,979 $105,148 $69,090 $35,193 $1,858 $32,038 1.9
HIGH $37,708 $796,367 $157,065 $35,193 $1,858 $120,014 4.2
4.5 ALTERNATIVE FOUR – BOZEMAN CREEK HYDRAULIC CROSSING REPLACEMENT
4.5.1 Description
Alternative Four increases conveyance down the Bozeman Creek channel by replacing all hydraulic
structures on Bozeman Creek including the downtown tunnels without any channel grading between
these structures (beyond light grading at each installation). Unlike Alternatives One and Two, Alternative
Four also includes the replacement of hydraulic structures under the I-90 corridor. This alternative was
introduced later in the PER process at the City of Bozeman’s request since by that time, it was recognized
that the I-90 corridor hydraulic conveyance was an important consideration. It is assumed that each
structure will be replaced to pass the design flow without overbank flow. In some areas, the channel itself
is the limiting factor in the conveyance of flood flows.
The goal of this alternative is to reduce land acquisition and large-scale grading that is needed to
reconstruct the channel through the city. In the downtown area, the tunnels will be removed and replaced
with larger hydraulic structures or as noted earlier may be widened/enlarged in place if the existing
building foundations can be underpinned properly. However, for the purposes of this cost estimate, it was
assumed the tunnels and buildings are removed and replaced with box culverts to cross Olive, Babcock,
and Main Street.
Alternative Four includes the following elements:
• 2.13-mile-long stretch from Church Avenue to Gold Avenue with grading only at the structures
replaced;
• the replacement of hydraulic structures under the Interstate-90 corridor;
• Channel side slopes approaching structures of 2.5H:1V;
46
• 21 hydraulic structures, bridges, or tunnels modified or replaced (including the replacement of
hydraulic structures under the Interstate-90 corridor as noted above);
• Real estate acquisition required of about 1.32 acres;
• Three buildings to be demolished and removed; and,
• Bank protection utilizing riprap, natural vegetation, and some shoring/cribs.
Figure 10 (shown previously) provides a typical channel section for Alternative Two which is also
applicable to the channel grading at structures envisioned as part of Alternative Four. Typical bridge or
culvert replacement assumes installation of two 14-foot X 8-foot concrete box culverts with length as
required for each crossing. These costs were included in the cost estimate for Alternative Four.
If chosen, Alternative Four may be best implemented by starting at the downstream end and working
upstream (south) to limit the potential for induced flooding.
4.5.2 Design Criteria
The primary goal of Alternative Four is to reduce the land acquisition and grading costs in comparison to
Alternative One. This alternative also includes additional conveyance capacity through I-90 which is a
potential element of any flood mitigation project in Bozeman. Under this alternative and for the model
simulations, all hydraulic structures (including the three downtown tunnels) that cannot convey the
design flood were removed and replaced with channel cuts that can convey the design flood (1,250 cfs).
During final design, these channel cuts (in the model) will be replaced as required with appropriately
designed hydraulic structures capable of passing the design flood.
The flood metrics for Alternative Four for the 500-year, 100-year, and 50-year floods are provided in Table
12. This table also depicts the number of structures where new or worsened flooding was observed based
upon the modeling results. This “induced flooding” metric is an important final design consideration once
an alternative is selected. As discussed previously, final design and optimization may enable any induced
flooding to be minimized. However, for this alternative, eliminating all induced flooding may not be
feasible without further channel conveyance improvements.
Table 12 – Summary of Alternative Four Flood Data
Flood Metrics 500-Year Flood 100-Year Flood 50-Year Flood
Average Inundation
Depth (ft)
0.53 0.23 0.14
Maximum Inundation
Depth (ft)
6.06 5.44 5.14
# Structures with
inundation depth > 1.0
feet
61 25 18
# Structures with
Induced Flood Damage
113 41 17
4.5.3 Map
Figure 13 provides and overview of the proposed hydraulic structure replacements and the extent of
flooding predicted for the 100-year flood event.
47
Figure 13 - Alternative Four Overview
4.5.4 Environmental Impacts
This alternative reduces the estimated damage during a flood event in comparison to the No Action
Alternative but not to the extent of Alternatives One and Two. However, this alternative eliminates
reconstruction of the entire channel length, saving on land acquisition and grading. The disadvantage is
there would be no improvements to the channel beyond some localized work near each of the hydraulic
structures slated for replacement.
4.5.5 Land Requirements
To allow for hydraulic structure replacement, 1.32 acres of land and three buildings will need to be
acquired. Real estate acquisition cost is estimated to be $14.2 million. Furthermore, legal fees are
estimated to add an additional 20% or $2.8 million to the total real estate cost.
48
Three buildings would need to be acquired and removed to allow for the daylighting of Bozeman Creek
where the current tunnels exist. The first building is located at 316 Babcock Street and currently home to
Bozeman Creek Family Health. Two buildings on Main Street will also need to be removed – 312 E. Main
Street (home to Nova Café) and 311 E. Main Street (home to Bar Nine).
The cost estimate and economic analysis for this alternative (discussed below) includes the acquisition
and removal of the three buildings on Main Street and Babcock Street.
Another permutation of this alternative worthy of further consideration would be the in-place
modification of the three downtown tunnels to convey the design flow. Under this option, the downtown
tunnels would be effectively widened by 12 to 15 feet to convey the design flow. Geotechnical
underpinning technology would be used to modify the existing downtown building foundations and
transfer their loads to new foundation elements. Although this permutation was not fully developed at
the same level of detail as the primary Alternative Four, AESI believes this option should be further
investigated. If the existing building foundations could be underpinned, this would eliminate the need for
property acquisition apart from acquiring some additional square footage in the basement of each
building to accommodate the enlarged tunnels.
4.5.6 Potential Construction Problems
Like most downtown corridors, buildings along Bozeman’s Main Street are built with minimal to no
setbacks between one another. Given the construction of Alternative Three requires the removal of three
downtown buildings, concerns arise regarding the structural integrity of the surrounding buildings.
Furthermore, erosion from the waterway could continue to affect structural integrity of surrounding
buildings. Shoring and cribbing for lateral support have been included as a line item in the cost estimate
to mitigate this concern.
Another area of concern is construction access. Given the dense population of the project area, it is
possible that additional real estate may need to be acquired temporarily (through easements) to provide
construction access for large equipment. To permit efficient access to replace the various undersized
structures, a contractor may be forced to work upstream to downstream or vice versa during construction
to minimize the need for work areas.
4.5.7 Sustainability Considerations
Alternative Four (similar to Alternative One) addresses the undersized structures along Bozeman Creek
that require continual maintenance or may be damaged by future floods.
However, the elimination of channel work as part of Alternative Four carries risk regarding bank
protection and environmental impacts. Any inadequacies in the current bank protection system could
cause damage to private property and increase maintenance costs. Environmental features are not
included in Alternative Four, limiting the benefit that the project could provide to surrounding habitat.
4.5.8 Cost Estimate
The total estimated cost for Alternative Four is $62,946,581. The detailed cost estimate for Alternative
Four can be found in Appendix C. This estimate includes a 75% contingency. A high contingency was
applied given no detailed design has yet been completed and takes into consideration the escalating real
estate values in Gallatin County.
49
Operation and maintenance costs are included as part of the cost estimate at 0.25% of construction costs
per year (with a 50-year project life cycle), or 5.3% of the total construction present worth value. However,
this cost is estimated to be less than the current operation and maintenance costs. Proper flood mitigation
decreases street flooding, sediment impoundment, hydraulic structure plugging, and other events that
require maintenance, thereby decreasing costs.
If Alternative Four is selected by the City, the annual flood damage is expected to be reduced considerably.
At the 100-year event, the number of structures inundated by more than 0.01 feet of water would be
reduced to 174 structures compared to 367 structures under the existing conditions. Over the proposed
50-year project life with a 4.10% interest rate, the present value of annual damages is estimated to range
from a low value of about $39 million to a high value of $637 million.
Table 13 summarizes the results from the economic analysis for Alternative Four. Note the positive
benefit cost ratio.
Table 13 - Alternative Four Economic Analysis
Expected
Annual
Damages
($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Damages
($1,000s)
Scenario
Benefits
($1,000s)
Project First
Costs ($1,000s)
Present
Value of
Mainten
ance
Costs
($1,000s)
Net
Benefits
($1,000s)
Benefit-
Cost
Ratio
LOW $1,829 $38,631 $135,607 $62,947 $3,323 $69,337 2.0
HIGH $30,166 $637,094 $316,338 $62,947 $3,323 $250,068 4.8
4.6 OTHER ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED
AESI investigated (at a lower level of detail) two other alternatives beyond Alternatives One through Four.
These alternatives have not been explicitly modeled with the 2D HEC-RAS model. However, AESI has
included some discussion of these additional alternatives since they perhaps have some engineering merit
and would significantly reduce the need for real estate acquisition in downtown Bozeman in comparison
to the four primary alternatives. The two other options briefly investigated include:
• Upstream storage within the Custer-Gallatin National Forest area; and,
• Bored tunnel diversion.
4.6.1 Upstream Storage Reservoir
The idea of adding upstream reservoir storage to the Bozeman Creek drainage system has been around
since 1980 or before (City of Bozeman, 1980). The general concept would be to construct a small dam in
the Bozeman Creek drainage within the Custer-Gallatin National Forest in the upper reaches of the
watershed to store floodwater temporarily. This dam may also serve as a permanent water supply if
adequate additional capacity is built into the dam to address floods. Previous studies looked at several
locations in the National Forest area but found that none of the options were economically feasible at
that time. For this study, AESI briefly looked at upstream storage alternatives. Dam locations were
considered in the Gallatin Valley, foothills area, and in the National Forest. Based on our brief review, the
best location appears to be within the National Forest area although due to the narrow valley and nature
of the topography in that area, the proposed reservoir would be long and narrow.
50
AESI reviewed the previous 1980 report and adopted a proposed dam location just upstream of the former
USGS gage # 06047500. Although the gage only operated for a few years in the 1950s, the data available
does portray typical spring snow melt flows for three years. AESI used this data as an input to a simple
(and very preliminary) HEC-HMS model and combined it with a hypothetical spring rainstorm in order to
generate realistic 100-year flood flows. At the proposed valley dam site, the estimated 100-year inflow
based upon the United States Geological Survey (USGS) StreamStats program would be about 750 cfs.
AESI was able to reproduce this inflow with the HEC-HMS model. The typical annual peak snowmelt flow
is around 150 to 200 cfs and this flow persists over a week or two. Therefore, any flood storage reservoir
would be designed to capture flows above that amount or about 550 cfs of inflow at peak. Also, most
likely a reservoir would be a multi-purpose structure and include a water supply component similar to
what was evaluated in 1980.
AESI looked at multiple storage volumes for the upstream storage option. Storage of 1,850 acre-feet
would potentially reduce the 100-year flood peak downstream at Ice Pond Park by 30 to 40%. Storage of
3,700 acre-feet would result in a 50 to 60% reduction of the flood peak downstream.
However, any reservoir option would have several major drawbacks. First, due to the narrow nature of
the Bozeman Creek valley, any dam would likely need to be at least 100 to 150 feet high to provide
meaningful storage volume. Second, any dam would require a wide auxiliary spillway which may limit dam
types that would be feasible. For example, an earthen dam may be precluded since it would have an
armored or concrete chute spillway of similar width as the main dam itself. Finally, any reservoir would
likely require relocation of the existing Forest Service trail/road that runs along Bozeman Creek. This trail
system is immensely popular with area residents. Figure 14 provides a general vicinity map with the
location of the dam used in the AESI evaluation.
51
Figure 14 – Upstream Storage Overview
52
4.6.2 Diversion of Stream Around Bozeman
AESI also evaluated a second flood diversion option. Under this concept, a tunnel would be bored through
the Tertiary sediments comprising the hills under Burke Park Ridge, the Bozeman Cemetery, the Bozeman
Softball Complex, plus a small number of private properties to address flooding. The tunnel would be
concrete-lined with a diameter of 12 to 16 feet and laid at a slope of about 1.7%. The tunnel length would
vary depending on the final alignment but AESI looked at one option that would be about 4,500 feet long.
This diversion option offers some advantages over other diversion concepts in that it would bypass the
entire flood flow without disrupting any residents in the downtown area and also require limited property
acquisition.
The proposed tunnel entrance area would be well-contained between South Church (Sourdough Road
which is above the existing floodplain) and the upland area to the east. However, as with any bypass
option, there are still stability issues associated with splitting flood flows since the split channels generally
cannot convey as much sediment or debris as the single channel, which in this situation could result in
sediment plugging the Bozeman Creek Channel downstream of the bypass. A mechanical gate in the
overflow broad crested weir would be possible to allow sediment into the tunnel during flood situations.
It could also allow the tunnel to accept practically the entire flood from Bozeman Creek, if necessary. The
conceptual tunnel entrance would be a 12-foot-wide by 100-foot-long broad crested concrete structure.
Figure 15 provides a conceptual plan and profile for one tunnel alignment evaluated by AESI.
Figure 15 – Conceptual Plan and Profile view of tunnel
53
5 SELECTION OF AN ALTERNATIVE
Alternatives One, Two, Three, and Four that were evaluated in detail in this PER appear to be viable based
strictly on the engineering performance and economic evaluation (summarized further below). Each
alternative has both advantages and disadvantages that must be further weighed and contrasted during
the public involvement process. AESI has compiled a list of performance metrics that should be considered
as part of the evaluation process. This list is not meant to be comprehensive as it is understood that
stakeholders and the public will likely introduce other critical performance measures as each alternative
is discussed. It is also possible that a hybrid of the four primary alternatives are eventually chosen as the
preferred alternative.
5.1 LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS
Alternatives One, Two, Three, and Four have been evaluated using a complete life cycle cost analysis. The
capital cost, increase in O&M costs, expected damages, and average annual benefits have been compared
to determine the total costs and net benefit of each alternative. Detailed results for the economic analysis
are found in each alternative’s description.
5.1.1 Benefit-Cost Ratio and Net Benefits
Each alternative was compared based on the benefit-cost ratio, as well as national economic development
benefits or “net benefits.” Table 14 compares four alternatives with the No Action alternative using the
most conservative “Low Benefit” evaluation. As discussed previously, the net benefits are the total
present value of flood mitigation benefits minus the total project costs (including both project initial costs
and present value of O&M costs). The benefit-to-cost ration or BCR is estimated by taking the total flood
mitigation benefits divided by the total project costs. In summary, all alternatives have positive BCRs
suggesting that any of them provide positive economic benefits.
Table 14 – Benefit-Cost Ratio Analysis
Total Costs
(First Costs + PV
of O&M Costs)
Present Value
of Net
Benefits Over
50 Years
Benefit/Cost
Ratio
No
Action/Existing
Condition
0 0 NA
Alternative One $79,702,735 $73,041,394 1.9
Alternative Two $50,771,018 $108,557,720 3.0
Alternative Three $35,193,273 $32,038,201 1.9
Alternative Four $62,946,581 $69,336,678 2.0
5.2 NON-MONETARY FACTORS
Each alternative was also evaluated using a variety of non-monetary factors. These factors include
operations and maintenance considerations, impacts from flooding extents, real estate acquisition, social
impacts, and environmental impacts.
54
5.2.1 Operations and Maintenance Considerations
Although all alternatives require operations and maintenance, they vary in their respective complexity.
Estimating detailed O&M costs for each alternative is beyond AESI’s present scope of work for this PER.
Nonetheless, reducing needed O&M is of particular consideration for the City of Bozeman based on
project goals of resilience and longevity. Given the high population growth rate, the City’s infrastructure
will continue to receive increased stress, and O&M will continue to be a priority for City personnel.
According to Montana Administrative Code (MCA 7-14-2201), non-highway bridge maintenance is the
responsibility of Gallatin County, even for bridges located within the City of Bozeman limits.
Many O&M activities are the same for all alternatives, including the No Action Alternative. Alternatives
One and Two include a new or widened/deepened flood conveyance channel, new hydraulic structures,
bank stabilization, etc. Alternatives Three and Four only includes improvements at channel crossings.
O&M activities that would be necessary for all alternatives include flood debris clean-up and removal,
hydraulic structure inspections and maintenance, riprap inspections and repair, and vegetation
maintenance.
Groundwater pumping to mitigate ice jams was not specifically evaluated as part of this PER but would
likely be reduced under Alternative One, as this alternative provides a larger channel section and a new
low-flow channel. The current pumping maintenance for ice jams would likely continue as-is for the
second, third, fourth, and no action alternatives.
Major O&M areas of concern are hydraulic structure damage and bank erosion. Undersized hydraulic
structures are more likely to experience damage during floods due to debris collection and high velocity
flows. Constriction at hydraulic structures increases flow velocities, which raises erosive power. If a
structure were to plug with a large tree and/or debris, flow would be forced into the surrounding area.
This overbank flow would increase damage and cleanup costs in the floodplain.
5.2.2 Real Estate Acquisition
Land and building acquisition are major areas of concern in this project. In addition to the continual
escalation of real estate costs in the Bozeman area, some of the real estate needs as part of these
alternatives coincide with historical buildings and areas. Real estate acquisition for this project could turn
into a lengthy, high-profile process depending on the alternative selected. All of the alternatives require
some level of real estate acquisition with Alternative One requiring the most and Alternatives Three and
Four requiring the least. Alternatives One and Four also include the acquisition and demolition of three
buildings while Alternative Two has similar requirements but is limited to one building. No buildings would
be removed under Alternative Three.
5.2.3 Social Impacts
As discussed previously, this project directly affects many prominent areas in the City of Bozeman. Not
only does Bozeman Creek run through the heart of the city, but it also runs through multiple historical
areas and under historical buildings.
Recreational access, open space, and aesthetic surroundings improve quality of life in urban areas like the
corridor found along Bozeman Creek. The existing condition of Bozeman Creek provides limited
recreational access to the waterway. Improving the environmental viability of the creek can also help
55
foster recreation in addition to improving aesthetics in the urban ecosystem. An added benefit of adding
new access to this area would be to reduce dependency on cars and improve walkability.
While Alternative One will create considerable disturbance in the downtown Bozeman historic area during
construction, the final result with flood mitigation, more open space, and a restored stream corridor,
provides significant benefits. In the short term, a significant number of mature trees may have to be
removed or relocated as part of the Alternative One, however tree planting and revegetation would also
be integral to the completion of this alternative. Also note that Alternative One provides an increase in
recreational access and connectivity, with a channel trail proposed to run the entire length of the project
corridor. Conversely, Alternative One would require the removal of three historic buildings in the
downtown Bozeman historic district which has its own complexities. As suggested previously in this
report, we believe it would be prudent to investigate the possibility of underpinning the building
foundations to allow the tunnels to be enlarged without building removal.
Alternative Two provides a flood channel to carry 823 cfs along the Mill Ditch corridor during the design
flood event. This corridor presently conveys the existing Mill Ditch, which historically was created for
irrigation and to bring water to a wheel that powered the Story Mill. This route intentionally ascends from
the valley floor to gain a higher position needed for flood irrigation and powering the Story Mill water
wheel. This route is not as well contained as the natural creek alignment and requires considerable
excavation to contain the desired flood flows. The excavation of the large flood channel along the Mill
Ditch corridor will require removal of a considerable number of mature trees along existing trails. While
the finished flood channel can be vegetated with grass and other low vegetation, its function as a flood
channel is not compatible with significant trees or brush in the channel. Since the channel will seldom
flow, its aesthetic value will be limited to an open corridor six to eight feet below the surrounding grade
with a 22- to 26-foot bottom width and relatively steep banks. A wide trail in the open ditch would be
compatible with its function as a flood channel and could provide City residents with further recreational
access and transportation connectivity. Landscaping with trees and tall brush on top of the banks is
compatible with its use as a flood channel. Perhaps the most significant social impact of converting the
corridor into a flood channel is that while it effectively mitigates flooding in a large part of town, it will
create flooding risks in a new part of the City of Bozeman.
As with Alternative One, Alternative Four will require the removal of the main street buildings.
Alternatively, it may be possible to underpin the building foundations and enlarge the tunnels, but will
require significantly more investigation to determine the feasibility.
A commuter trail will not be possible under Alternatives Three or Four. The current channel geometry
does not leave adequate hydraulic capacity to accommodate a gravel trail in its banks. However, a possible
advantage to Alternatives Three and Four is its value as a precursor to other more comprehensive
solutions. Alternatives Three and Four could be very beneficial in their ability to partially mitigate flooding
events over time while capital costs and public support are raised for a more permanent solution.
5.2.4 Environmental Impacts
Environmental sustainability is an important aspect of this project. The existing condition of the Bozeman
Creek ecosystem is constrained by encroachments into its channel and natural riparian zone and
floodplain. Enabling environmental viability to return to Bozeman Creek will foster balance in not only the
local urban ecosystem, but also in the larger Gallatin Valley watershed.
56
Creating a more sustainable waterway for Bozeman Creek through downtown can also mitigate much of
the flood hazard of downtown Bozeman. Many of the optional environmental items provided in these
alternatives are regenerative approaches to improve aquatic habitat and reduce erosive forces. Utilizing
these approaches helps improve the ecosystem and reduce flood risks.
Of the alternatives, Alternative One allows Bozeman Creek to return closest to its natural conditions.
Replacement of all hydraulic structures and reconstruction of the channel geometry removes the existing
constrictions. A low flow channel would ensure proper depth in the creek during the dry months and
promote year-long aquatic species habitat. Alternative One also provides room for the incorporation of
many environmental features, including stormwater treatment, bank protection, rock weirs, log vanes,
seeding, planting, and regeneration of wetland areas. However, the construction of Alternative One may
also result in the removal or relocation of mature trees and limited impacts to the small, existing wetlands
present along the current stream.
Alternative Two provides some environmental benefit for Bozeman Creek in that the Mill Creek bypass
will bear the brunt of the Bozeman Creek flooding which saves a wide swath of downtown Bozeman from
overbank flooding. One drawback is that this alternative will require the removal of many mature trees
and the disturbance of existing wetlands. Wetland mitigation may be more significant under Alternative
Two.
Although Alternatives Three and Four focus directly on Bozeman Creek, their features do not significantly
improve the environmental sustainability of Bozeman Creek as a stand-alone solution. Since channel work
is removed under Alternatives Three and Four, the low-flow channel, stormwater treatment, bank
protection, and aquatic organism passage features are likewise removed. However, the installation of new
hydraulic structures under Alternatives Three and Four is a necessary component of enhancing the size
and conveyance capacity of the Bozeman Creek corridor and as noted earlier, may be a precursor to future
channel work. Since Alternatives Three and Four are limited in scope, they have less impact to mature
trees and wetlands as compared to the other two alternatives.
5.2.5 Constructability Considerations
The construction of each of the four alternatives presents some challenges for implementation and for
this reason, is an important performance metric and consideration.
Alternative One has perhaps the greatest challenges when it comes to construction given both the channel
reconstruction and the removal of existing buildings/tunnels. Currently, access through public right-of-
way is limited and may require additional real estate acquisition to facilitate access. For this PER, a 10
percent factor of safety for real estate acquisition was included to allow for contractor needs.
Alternative Two also has similar construction access limitations, although not as severe as Alternative One.
Access through the City of Bozeman property is available for the upper reaches of the bypass but is less
available downstream. Alternative Two also must cut through a portion of Peets Hill adjacent the Bozeman
Library. This cut will likely require slope stabilization or a long and tall retaining wall to be included and
constructed in the area. During construction, some recreational areas may also require temporary closure,
which should be a consideration in evaluating this alternative.
57
Alternative Three has the least constructability issues given this alternative only involves the replacement
of hydraulic structures. In many cases, access to these structures could be facilitated through existing City
of Bozeman or MDT roads.
Alternative Four would include the demolition of the downtown tunnels and buildings with the same
challenges as outlined under Alternative One.
6 PROPOSED PROJECT (RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVES)
As discussed in this report, all alternatives appear to be viable options to mitigate flooding along the
downtown Bozeman Creek corridor. These alternatives, plus other hybrid options introduced through the
public involvement process, will be further screened and evaluated. Ultimately, the City of Bozeman and
the various stakeholders will select one alternative to move forward with into detailed design and
optimization.
As noted in various sections of this report, at a minimum we suggest the stabilization of the downtown
tunnels to prevent a future failure.
6.1 PRELIMINARY PROJECT DESIGN
Section 4 previously discussed the proposed design features of each alternative. As noted all four
alternatives appear to be viable options for consideration. Therefore, this section discusses some of the
design considerations that will require evaluation during detailed design.
Under Alternatives One and Two, the channel geometry of Bozeman Creek or the Mill Ditch bypass will
require modification to increase the conveyance capacity. Generally, the bottom width of the channel
(under either alternative) will vary from 20 to 26 feet with depths of 5 to 7 feet and 2.5H:1V side slopes.
A low-flow channel is proposed to allow aquatic organism passage during low flows. The channel can be
lined with riprap and seeded for bank protection. Figure 16 depicts a proposed typical three-dimensional
section under Alternatives One and Two.
58
Figure 16 - Alternative One or Two Typical Cartoon Section
Optional items to improve social and environmental viability were also included in the design of
Alternative One. These items are depicted in Figure 16 above. Features such as rock weirs and log vanes
have been included to improve the aquatic habitat of the creek. An optional 6-foot-wide gravel commuter
trail is also provided.
To arrive at the best alternative and as a necessary next step, AESI has outlined further design tasks
needed for the project. Additional work in detailed design should include the following items:
• Extension of the hydraulic model downstream from I-90 to the East Gallatin River.
• Possible hydraulic model extension upstream on Bozeman Creek to check flood impacts to
upstream residents.
• Study of the potential change in flooding along the East Gallatin River by following the Alternative
Two bypass option. Additional floodwater would be introduced to a one to two mile segment of
the river as part of Alternatives Two.
• Refinement and optimization of the channel alignment and section. Short segments of retaining
walls or further crib walls could be used to minimize real estate acquisition.
• Additional survey cross-sections should be collected along Bozeman Creek to improve the model.
• Completion of a detailed building inventory as well as first floor elevation surveys (to an accuracy
of 0.10 feet) to further refine the economic evaluation.
• Evaluation of the need for new or improved hydraulic structures under I-90.
• Vegetation and wetland surveys to identify all areas of potential environmental mitigation.
• Refinement of alternative performance metrics.
• Selection of a final recommended alternative for implementation.
59
6.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Given the complexity and cost of any project commissioned along Bozeman Creek, we anticipate the work
would occur over a time frame of 20 years or more.
6.3 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Due to the project’s impact on floodplains and floodways, stormwater, wetlands, and other protected
features, multiple permits will be required for the implementation of any alternative chosen. The most
intensive permit needed will be the FEMA Conditional Letter of Map Revision and Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR/LOMR).
Other permits required for implementation include the Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP),
Montana Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310) permitting, Montana Stream Protection Act (124)
permitting, Montana Floodplain and Floodway Management Act permitting, Federal Clean Water Act
(Section 404 and 10) permitting, and Short-term Turbidity (318) and Water Quality Certification (401)
permitting. The total cost of these permits, including LOMR preparation, is estimated to range from
$100,000 to $150,000 and is included in the cost estimates.
6.4 TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
The initial project cost will likely range from about $35 million to $80 million dollars. The detailed cost
estimate for Alternatives One, Two, Three, and Four can be found in Appendix C. In addition to the first
project costs, operations and maintenance costs were estimated. A contingency of 75% was utilized to
allow for the low level of design detail presently available and to recognize the escalating real estate values
in Gallatin County.
6.5 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
6.5.1 INCOME
The City of Bozeman collects $1.7 million per year from utility rate payers to fund three stormwater
programs: deferred maintenance, utility operations, and system enhancements (City of Bozeman, 2024).
This money is collected via a flat charge and a variable charge proportional to the amount of impervious
area on a property. This source of income could be used to help fund the project.
6.5.2 ANNUAL O&M COSTS
O&M costs are estimated at 0.25% of the construction first cost per year over a 50-year project life cycle.
For example, under Alternative One, the present value of O&M costs over the 50-year planning period is
estimated to be $4,208,155.
6.5.3 FUNDING OPTIONS
Sources of funding for this project include grants from FEMA. FEMA offers a Flood Mitigation Assistance
Grant. This competitive program provides funding to eliminate the risk of repetitive flood damage to
buildings insured by the NFIP. The application is ranked based on eligibility and cost-effectiveness of the
project.
7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The purpose of this study has been to evaluate the current flooding problems along the Bozeman Creek
corridor and develop a range of flood mitigation alternatives. All the alternatives evaluated appear to be
60
viable with various benefits, costs, and impacts. The City of Bozeman plans to involve the community
through an in-depth public involvement process to further vet alternative performance metrics and to
ultimately select one alternative for implementation.
8 REFERENCES
Autodesk. (2022). AutoCAD Civil3D.
City of Bozeman. (1980). Preliminary Investigation Report, Bozeman Creek Watershed, Gallatin County,
Montana. Bozeman, MT USA: Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with the City of Bozeman
and others.
City of Bozeman. (2018). City of Bozeman GIS Open Data. Retrieved from LiDAR Data: https://public-
bozeman.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/li-dar
City of Bozeman. (2020). City of Bozeman Community Plan. Bozeman, MT: City of Bozeman.
City of Bozeman. (2024). Stormwater Utility Components. Retrieved from Learn About My Utility Bill:
https://www.bozeman.net/departments/utilities/stormwater/learn-about-my-utility-bill
FEMA. (2021). Flood Insurance Study, Gallatin County, Montana. Washington, D.C. USA: FEMA.
Gallatin County Commision. (2021). Gallatin County Growth Policy . Bozeman.
Heritage, M. N. (2022). Animal Species of Concern. Helena.
Heritage, M. N. (2022). Plant Species of Concern. Helena.
Michael Baker International. (2015). Bozeman Creek & Tributaries Floodplain Study Phase 2.
Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. (2014). Bozeman Creek Hydrologic Analysis.
Helena: Michael Baker.
Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. (n.d.). FishMT. Retrieved from Bozeman Creek:
https://myfwp.mt.gov/fishMT/waterbody/searchByID?waterBodyID=50923
Mountain Time Arts. (2023). See Bozeman Creek. Retrieved from https://mountaintimearts.org/see-
bozeman-creek
National Park Service. (2020, September). National Register of Historical Places.
Realtor.com. (2024, December 1). Realtor.com. Retrieved from www.realtor.com
Sallee, J. (2024, May). Paddleboarders take on Montana creek to bring attention to impaired waterway.
Retrieved from 8KPAX Missoula And Western Montana: https://www.kpax.com/news/montana-
news/paddleboarders-take-on-montana-creek-to-bring-attention-to-impaired-waterway
Smith, G. P., Davey, E. K., & Cox, R. (2014). Flood Hazard. Water Research Laboratory Technical Report, 1-
50.
The Montana National Register Sign Program. (2021). Hotel Bozeman.
61
United States Army Corps of Engineers. (1988). National Economic Development Procedures Manual -
Urban Flood Damage. Fort Belvoir: Institute for Water Resources.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (n.d.). Wetland Mapper. Retrieved from National Wetland
Inventory: https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/
United States Geological Survey. (2024, February). National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 Products
(ver. 3.0, February 2024). Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/data/national-land-cover-
database-nlcd-2019-products-ver-30-february-2024
United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). Montana Cadastral. Retrieved from Montana State Library:
https://svc.mt.gov/msl/cadastral/?page=Map
US Army Corps of Engineers. (2024). HEC-HMS. Retrieved from Hydraulic Engineerign Center:
https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/
USACE. (2024). Hydrologic Engineering Center- River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). Version 6.4.1.
Zillow. (2024). Zillow. Retrieved from https://www.zillow.com/
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX A
Existing Utilities
Mill DitchBozeman CreekMSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
Structure Name
1 Mill Diversion Crossing
2 Church Ave. Galligator Crossing (1 of 2)
3 Church Ave. Crossing
4 Church Ave. Galligator Crossing (2 of 2)
5 Wallace Ave. Footbridge
6 Wallace Ave. Galligator Crossing
7 Main St. Tunnel
8 Village Downtown Blvd. Crossing
9 Village Downtown Blvd. Railroad Crossing
10 Simpkins Road Crossing
11 Front St. Crossing
12 Front St. Railroad Crossing (1 of 2)
13 Front St. Railroad Crossing (2 of 2)
14 Cedar St. Crossing
15 Interstate 90 Crossing
16 Bohart Rd. Crossing
FIGURE: A-1DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities Overview.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSBOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Channel Centerline
Parcel
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
Mill Ditch
Structure Order - Upstream to Downstream
Bozeman Creek
Structure Name
1 Church Ave. Footbridge
2 Church Ave. Galligator Crossing
4 Story St. Crossing
5 Bogert Park Pedestrian Crossing
6 Rouse Ave. and Olive St. Tunnel
7 Babcock St. Tunnel
8 Main St. Tunnel
9 Bar 9 Pedestrian Bridge
10 Main St. Alley Crossing
11 Mendenhall St. Crossing
12 City Hall Pedestrian Bridge
13 Lamme St. Crossing
14 Rouse Ave. Private Drive Crossing
15 Rouse Ave. Crossing
16 Peach St. Crossing
17 Tamarack St. Footbridge
18 Tamarack St. Crossing
19 Warehouse Road Crossing
20 Railroad Bridge Upstream of I-90
21 I-90 Interstate Culvert Stream Crossing
22 Story Mill Spur Trail Crossing
23 Gold Ave. Crossing
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. GALLIGATOR CROSSINGBozeman
C
reek
8 INCH VCPFIGURE: A-2DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSCHURCH AVE. GALLIGATOR
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1.APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING.2.WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.3.UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTURE
DESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING STORY ST. CROSSING
Bozeman CreekSTORY ST
ALLEY BOGERT PLBONNER LN6 INCH CAST IRON8 INCH AC6 INCH VCP
8 INCH PVC
8 INCH VCP6 INCH VCP
8 INCH PVC
24 INCH PVC
15 INCH PVC60 INCH RCPA12 INCH PVC24 INCH PVC
12 INCH PVC12 INCH PVCFIGURE: A-3DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSSTORY ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING BOGERT PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
Bozeman CreekALLEY
BOGERT PLLINDLEY PLKOCH ST 8 INCH AC6 INCH VCPFIGURE: A-4DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSBOGERT PARK PED. BRIDGE
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY TWO OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING ROUSE AVE. AND OLIVE AVE. TUNNEL
EXISTING BABCOCK ST. TUNNEL CROSSING
Bozeman CreekChurch Ave SplitRouse Ave DtnOLIVE ST
BABCOCK ST
ROUSE AVEALLEY LINDLEY PL10 INCH CAST IRON
21 INCH PVC
8 INCH PVC24 INCH PVC6 INCH VCP
8 INCH AC6 INCH VCP8 INCH PVC15 INCH PVC 60 INCH
RCPA
8 INCH VCP
4
0
I
N
C
H
R
C
P
A
8 INCH PVC
6 INCH VCP
4 INCH PVC
12 INCH PVC 12 INCH PVC
FIGURE: A-5DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSROUSE & OLIVE AVE. TUNNEL
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY FIVE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING ROUSE AVE. AND OLIVE AVE. TUNNEL
EXISTING BABCOCK ST. TUNNEL CROSSING
B
o
z
em
a
n
C
r
e
e
k Rouse Ave DtnBABCOCK ST
ROUSE AVEALLEY 24 INCH PVC6 INCH VCP
21 INCH PVC
8 INCH VCP
60
INCH RCPA
40
I
N
C
H
R
C
P
A
6 INCH VCP
4 INCH PVC
8 INCH PVC
12 INCH
P
V
C
FIGURE: A-6DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSROUSE & OLIVE AVE. TUNNEL
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.3. TUNNEL CROSSING PASSES BELOW EXISTINGBUILDING SHOWN.
EXISTING MAIN ST. TUNNEL CROSSING
EXISTING BAR 9 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
EXISTING MAIN ST. ALLEY CROSSING
Rouse Ave DtnBozeman CreekMain St SplitMAIN ST ROUSE AVE6 INCH CAST IRON6 INCH CAST IRON
8 INCH VCP 24 INCH PVC6 INCH VCP
36 INCH VCP
60 INCH RCPA18 INCH RCP12 INCH VCP42 INCH RCP10 INCH VCP144 INCH Conc Box Culv12 INCH VCP10 INCH VCPFIGURE: A-7DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSMAIN ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY THREE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING.
2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN
OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING MAIN ST. TUNNEL CROSSING
EXISTING BAR 9 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
EXISTING MAIN ST. ALLEY CROSSING
EXISTING MENDENHALL ST. CROSSING Rouse Ave DtnBozeman CreekROUSE AVEMENDENHALL ST
8 INCH DUCTILE IRON
24 INCH PVC6 INCH VCP
8 INCH PVC 6 INCH VCP
36 INCH VCP 42 INCH RCP18 INCH RCP12 INCH VCP
60 INCH RCPA36 INCH RCPA12 INCH RCP
44 INCH Conc Box Culv12 INC
H
R
C
P
FIGURE: A-8DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSMAIN ST. ALLEY & MENDEN. ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY THREE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING.
2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN
OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING CITY HALL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
EXISTING LAMME ST. CROSSING
Bozeman CreekRouse Ave DtnLAMME ST
ROUSE AVEMONTANA AVE24 INCH PVC10 INCH VCP 8 INCH VCP42 INCH RCP12 INCH RCP
12 INCH RCP
FIGURE: A-9DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSCITY HALL & LAMME ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.
2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
EXISTING ROUSE AVE. PRIVATE DRIVE CROSSING
EXISTING ROUSE AVE. CROSSING
Bozeman CreekROUSE AVEPERKINS PL24 INCH PVC8 INCH PVC18 INCH RCP18 INCH C
M
P
A
12 INCH RCP
12 INCH CMPFIGURE: A-10DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSROUSE AVE.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
EXISTING PEACH ST. CROSSINGBozeman CreekChurch Ave Split
PEACH STROUSE AVECHURCH AVEPERKINS PLPEACH ST
10 INCH DUCTILE IRON
24 INCH PVC10 INCH VCP8 INCH PVC15 INCH PVC
36 INCH RC
P
18 INCH RCP27 INCH RCP
12 INC
H
R
C
P
12 I
N
C
H
V
C
P
12 INCH PVC
12 INCH RCP
12 INCH RCP18 INCH RCP12 INCH RCPFIGURE: A-11DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSPEACH ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITY
LINES LOCATED NEAR FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING TAMARACK ST. FOOTBRIDGE
EXISTING TAMARACK ST. CROSSING Bozeman CreekTAMARACK ST
24 INCH PVC30 INCH PVC
36 INCH RCP
30 INCH PVC
30 IN
C
H
R
C
P
12 INCH RCP12 INCH PVCFIGURE: A-12DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSTAMARACK ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITY
LINES LOCATED NEAR FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING WAREHOUSE ROAD CROSSING
Bozeman CreekWallace Split
FIGURE: A-13DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSWAREHOUSE ROAD
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
EXISTING RAILROAD BRIDGE UPSTREAM OF I-90 Bozeman Cr
e
e
k
BIRCH ST
16 INCH CAST IRON18 INCH RCP
24 INCH RCP
FIGURE: A-14DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSRAILROAD BRIDGE
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
EXISTING I-90 INTERSTATE CULVERT STREAM CROSSING
EXISTING STORY MILL SPUR TRAIL CROSSING(OLD RAILROAD CROSSING)Bozeman CreekINTE
R
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
H
W
Y
GOLD
A
V
E
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
H
W
Y
12 INC
H
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
18 INCH CAST IRON6 INCH DUCTILE IRON18 INCH CAST IRON9 INCH RCP10 INCH RCP480 INCH Conc Box CulvFIGURE: A-15DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSINTERSTATE 90
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING.
2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN
OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
EXISTING I-90 INTERSTATE CULVERT STREAM CROSSING
EXISTING GOLD AVE. CROSSING
Bozeman CreekGOLD
A
V
E
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
H
W
Y
INTER
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
H
W
Y
12 INC
H
D
U
C
T
I
L
E
I
R
O
N
18 INCH CAST IRON6 INCH DUCTILE IRON8
INCH
PVC9 INCH RCP10 INCH RCPFIGURE: A-16DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSGOLD AVE.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.
2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
EXISTING MILL DITCH DIVERSION CROSSING
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. GALLIGATOR CROSSING (1 OF 2)
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. CROSSING
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. FOOTBRIDGE CROSSING
INACTIVE MILL DITCH DIVERSION STRUCTURE
CONCRETE WEIR STILL IN PLACE
Mill Di
t
c
hBozeman CreekCHURCH AVEBONNER LN
6 INCH CAST IRON6 INCH CAST IRON
8 INCH VCP6 INCH VCP8 INCH PVC
6 INCH PVC8 INCH AC
42 INCH RCP
FIGURE: A-17DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSDIVERSION AND GALLIGATOR
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING. 2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATIONMILL DITCH
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. GALLIGATOR CROSSING (1 OF 2)
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. CROSSING
EXISTING CHURCH AVE. GALLIGATOR CROSSING (2 OF 2)
Mill DitchCHURCH AVESTORY ST
6 INCH CAST IRON6 INCH CAST IRON
6 INCH CAST IRON
6 INCH VCP8 INCH PVC
6 INCH VCP
8 INCH PVC 8 INCH VCP24 INCH PVC
42 INCH RCP12 INCH PVC36 INCH FIGURE: A-18DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSCHURCH AVE.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMANOPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATIONMILL DITCH
EXISTING WALLACE AVE. FOOTBRIDGEMill Ditch18 INCH RCP10 INCH PVCFIGURE: A-19DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSWALLACE AVE. FOOTBRIDGE
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.
2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
EXISTING WALLACE AVE. GALLIGATOR CROSSING Mill Ditch18 INCH RCP10 INCH PVC20 INCH RCP
FIGURE: A-20DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSWALLACE AVE. GALLIGATOR
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
EXISTING MAIN ST. TUNNEL
EXISTING VILLAGE DOWTOWN BLVD. CROSSING
Mill DitchMAIN STBROADWAY AVEVILLAGE DOWNTOWN BLVD
BUTTONWOOD AVE6 INCH CAST IRON4 INCH CAST IRON8 INCH VCP8 INCH PVC
6 INCH VCP6 INCH PVC6 INCH VCP
24 INCH RCP
42 INCH RCPA8 INCH PVC12 INCH
18 INCH RCP 8 INCH VCP15 INCH VCP
6 INCH
V
C
P
15 INCH RCP12 INCH RCP0 INCH
24 INCH RCP
8 IN
C
H
V
C
P
8 INCH PVC18 INCH RCP 12 INCH
RCP
FIGURE: A-21DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSMAIN ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITY
LINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING.2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATIONMILL DITCH
EXISTING MAIN ST. TUNNEL
EXISTING VILLAGE DOWTOWN BLVD. CROSSING
EXISTING VILLAGE DOWNTOWN BLVD. RAILROAD CROSSING
Mill DitchBROADWAY AVEVILLAGE
D
O
W
N
T
O
W
N BLV
D
LAMME
S
T
MENDEN
H
A
L
L
S
T MEDIAN
MEDIAN 8 INCH VCP6 INCH VCP
8 INC
H
P
V
C
15 INCH
R
C
P
8 INCH VCP0 INCH 15 INCH VCP 144 INCH RCP18 INCH PVC8 INCH PVC6 INCH
V
C
P 15 INCH
PVC
42 I
N
C
H
C
M
P
42 INCH RCPA18 INCH HDPE
8 INCH PVC
15 INCH RC
P
8 IN
C
H
V
C
P6 INCH VCP42 I
N
C
H
C
M
P
FIGURE: A-22DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSVILLAGE DOWNTOWN BLVD.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
EXISTING SIMKINS ROAD CROSSING
Mill Ditc
h
BROADWAY AVEDAVIS S
T
VI
L
L
A
G
E
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
W
A
Y6 INCH CAST IRON8 INCH VCP15 INCH
R
C
P12 INCH
R
C
P
41 INC
H
C
M
P
41 INCH
C
M
P
FIGURE: A-23DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSSIMKINS ROAD
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.
2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
EXISTING FRONT ST. CROSSING
EXISTING FRONT ST. RAILROAD CROSSING (1 OF 2)Mill DitchMill RR SplitFR
O
N
T
S
T
VILLA
G
E
D
O
W
N
T
O
W
N
B
L
V
D
FR
O
N
T
S
T6 INCH CAST IRON6 I
N
C
H
C
A
S
T
I
R
O
N
24
I
N
C
H
P
V
C
8 INCH PVC15
I
N
C
H
R
C
P
47 INCH
CMP
12 INC
H
H
D
P
E 47 INCH
CMP
48 INCH RCP
FIGURE: A-24DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSFRONT ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,
AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.
2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
EXISTING FRONT ST. RAILROAD CROSSING (2 OF 2)Mill DitchFR
O
N
T
S
T
AUDUBON WAYFR
O
N
T
S
T
24
I
N
C
H
P
V
C
21
I
N
C
H
P
V
C8 INCH PVCFIGURE: A-25DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSRAILROAD CROSSING (2 OF 2)
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
EXISTING CEDAR ST. CROSSING
Mill DitchC
e
d
a
r
S
t
S
p
l
i
t
Mill R
R
S
p
l
i
t
C
E
D
A
R
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
HW
Y
52 INCH RCPFIGURE: A-26DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSCEDAR ST.
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
NOTE: 1. APPROXIMATELY ONE OVERHEAD UTILITYLINES LOCATED NEAR CROSSING.
2. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN
OPEN DATA.3. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATIONMILL DITCH
EXISTING INTERSTATE 90 CROSSING
EXISTING BOHART RD. CROSSINGMill DitchI9
0
S
p
l
i
t
Cedar St Spl
i
t
B
O
H
A
R
T
L
N
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
HW
Y
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
9
0
H
W
Y
FIGURE: A-27DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/23/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 25 50 75
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Utilities.mxd1 inch = 50 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGSINTERSTATE 90
LEGEND
Existing Culvert
Existing Bridge
Location
Existing Fiber Line - Overhead
Existing Fiber Line - Underground
Existing Water Main
Existing Wastewater Main
Existing Stormwater Pipe
Gallatin County Roads
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
NOTE: 1. WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER,AND FIBER LINE DATA FROM CITY OF BOZEMAN OPEN DATA.2. UTILITY CROSSINGS TO BE VERIFIED IN FUTUREDESIGN PHASES.
MILL DITCH
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX B
Model Results
FIGURE: B-1DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/1/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Existing Conditions Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
500-Year Event - Existing Conditions Inundation Boundary
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2D MODEL RESULTS
FIGURE: B-2DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/1/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Existing Conditions Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Existing Conditions Inundation Boundary
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2D MODEL RESULTS
FIGURE: B-3 DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/1/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Existing Conditions Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Existing Conditions Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10.5 ft
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2D MODEL RESULTS
FIGURE: B-4 DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/1/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Existing Conditions Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Existing Conditions Velocity
0 - 3 ft/s
3 - 6 ft/s
6 - 9 ft/s
9 - 12 ft/s
12 - 15 ft/s
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2D MODEL RESULTS
FIGURE: B-5 DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/2/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 DV Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Existing Conditions D*V
0 - 2.2 ft^2/s LOW
2.2 - 5.4 ft^2/s MEDIUM
5.4 - 16.1 ft^2/s HIGH
16.1 - 26.9 ft^2/s VERY HIGH
> 26.9 ft^2/s EXTREME
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
EXISTING CONDITIONS
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-6 DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/1/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Existing Conditions Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Design Flow- Existing Conditions Inundation Boundary
EXISTING CONDITIONS
2D MODEL RESULTS
NOTE: DESIGN FLOW IS 1250 CFS (BASED ON THE 1% ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT ADJUSTED FOR CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS).
FIGURE: B-7DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
500-Year Event - Alternative One Inundation Boundary
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
FIGURE: B-8DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative One Inundation Boundary
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
FIGURE: B-9DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative One Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
FIGURE: B-10DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year - Alternative One Velocity
0 - 3 ft/s
3 - 6 ft/s
6 - 9 ft/s
9 - 12 ft/s
12 - 15 ft/s
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
FIGURE: B-11DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year - Alternative One D*V
0 - 2.2 ft^2/s LOW
2.2 - 5.4 ft^2/s MEDIUM
5.4 - 16.1 ft^2/s HIGH
16.1 - 26.9 ft^2/s VERY HIGH
> 26.9 ft^2/s EXTREME
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
FIGURE: B-12DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Design Flow - Alternative One Inundation Boundary
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
NOTE: DESIGN FLOW IS 1250 CFS (BASED ON THE 1%ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT ADJUSTED FOR CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS).
FIGURE: B-13DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
500-Year Event - Alternative Two Inundation Boundary
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE TWO
FIGURE: B-14DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Two Inundation Boundary
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE TWO
FIGURE: B-15DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Two Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE TWO
FIGURE: B-16DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Two Velocity
0 - 3 ft/s
3 - 6 ft/s
6 - 9 ft/s
9 - 12 ft/s
12 - 15 ft/s
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE TWO
FIGURE: B-17DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Two D*V
0 - 2.2 ft^2/s LOW
2.2 - 5.4 ft^2/s MEDIUM
5.4 - 16.1 ft^2/s HIGH
16.1 - 26.9 ft^2/s VERY HIGH
> 26.9 ft^2/s EXTREME
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE TWO
FIGURE: B-18DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/21/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Design Flow - Alternative Two Inundation Boundary
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE TWO
NOTE: DESIGN FLOW IS 1250 CFS (BASED ON THE 1%ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT ADJUSTED FOR CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS).
FIGURE: B-19DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/21/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3B Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
500 Year Event - Alternative Three Inundation Boundary
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE THREE
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-20DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 4/17/2025
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3B Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative ThreeInundation Boundary
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE THREE
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-21 DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/21/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3B Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative ThreeDepth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2.5 ft
2.5 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE THREE
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-22 DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/21/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3B Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative ThreeVelocity
0 - 3 ft/s
3 - 6 ft/s
6 - 9 ft/s
9 - 12 ft/s
12 - 15 ft/s
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE THREE
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-23 DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/21/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3B Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative ThreeD*V
0 - 2.2 ft^2/s LOW
2.2 - 5.4 ft^2/s MEDIUM
5.4 -16.1 ft^2/s HIGH
16.1 - 26.9 ft^2/s VERY HIGH
> 26.9 ft^2/s EXTREME
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE THREE
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-24 DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/21/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3B Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
Design Flow - Alternative Three Inundation Boundary
NOTE: DESIGN FLOW IS 1250 CFS (BASED ON THE 1%ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT ADJUSTED
FOR CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS).
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE THREE
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-25DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/20/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
500-Year Event - Alternative Four Inundation Boundary
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
FIGURE: B-26DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/20/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Four Inundation Boundary
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-27DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/20/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Four Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-28DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/20/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Four Velocity
0 - 3 ft/s
3 - 6 ft/s
6 - 9 ft/s
9 - 12 ft/s
12 - 15 ft/s
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-29DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/20/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Four D*V
0 - 2.2 ft^2/s LOW
2.2 - 5.4 ft^2/s MEDIUM
5.4 - 16.1 ft^2/s HIGH
16.1 - 26.9 ft^2/s VERY HIGH
> 26.9 ft^2/s EXTREME
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-30DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/20/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions - Alt 3 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
Design Event - Alternative Four Inundation Boundary
NOTE: DESIGN FLOW IS 1250 CFS (BASED ON THE 1%ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT ADJUSTED
FOR CLIMATE CHANGE EFFECTS).
BO
RE
Z
S
E
T
M
O
A
R
N
A
C
T
R
IO
EE
N
K
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
FIGURE: B-31DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/13/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions with Interstate - Alt 1 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative One Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
WITH INCREASED I90 CAPACITY
ALTERNATIVE ONE
FIGURE: B-32DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/14/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\HEC-RAS Results\23-157 Proposed Conditions with Interstate - Alt 2 Results.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
LEGEND
100-Year Event - Alternative Two Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
WITH INCREASED I90 CAPACITY
ALTERNATIVE TWO
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX C
Economic Investigations
MAY 2025
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
0001 Mobilization/Demobilization, Bonding, & Submittals 1 LS $2,015,000.00 $2,015,000 5.00%
0002 FEMA Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Preparation 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.12%
0003 Preparation, Implementation, & Administration of SWPPP 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.12%0003 Montana Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%0004 Montana Stream Protection Act (124) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0005 Montana Floodplain and Floodway Management Act Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0006 Federal Clean Water Act (Section 404 and 10) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%0007 Short-term Turbidity (318) and Water Quality Certification (401) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%0008 Traffic Control 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 0.50%0009 Right-Of-Way Real Estate 1 LS $19,219,000.00 $19,219,000 47.69%
0010 Right-Of-Way Acquisition Legal Fees 1 LS $3,843,800.00 $3,843,800 9.54%SUBTOTAL $25,390,300.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
1000 Clearing and Grubbing 23900 SY $10.00 $239,000 0.59%
1001 Demolition of Existing Buildings 31000 SF $20.00 $620,000 1.54%
1002 Shoring and Cribs 490 LF $300.00 $147,000 0.36%1003 Topsoil Stripping, Stockpiling, and Replacement 2000 CY $20.00 $40,000 0.10%1004 Channel Grading (Includes site access, disposal, dewatering) 49700 CY $44.00 $2,186,800 5.43%
1005 Bank Protection - (2' D50 Rip Rap, 2' Thick) 22700 CY $80.00 $1,816,000 4.51%
1006 Hydraulic Seeding 640 SY $1.75 $1,120 0.00%SUBTOTAL $5,049,920.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
2000 Embankment Removal 540 CY $44.00 $23,760.00 0.06%
2001 Demolition of Large Existing Crossing Structures 12 EA $150,000.00 $1,800,000.00 4.47%
2002 Demolition of Small Existing Crossing Structures 7 EA $50,000.00 $350,000.00 0.87%2003 Removal of Existing Utilities 1965 LF $50.00 $98,250.00 0.24%SUBTOTAL $2,272,010.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
3000 Structural Backfill 366 CY $50.00 $18,300.00 0.05%
3001 Road Replacement 860 LF $100.00 $86,000.00 0.21%
3002 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert - 14' x 8' 1162 LF $6,120.00 $7,111,440.00 17.65%3003 Steel Pedestrian Bridge - 10' Width 250 LF $1,035.00 $258,750.00 0.64%3004 Water Line Crossing 56 LF $75.00 $4,200.00 0.01%
3005 Sanitary Sewer Line Crossing 313 LF $75.00 $23,475.00 0.06%
3006 Storm Sewer Line Crossing 385 LF $75.00 $28,875.00 0.07%3007 Dry Utilities Crossing 1183 LF $50.00 $59,150.00 0.15%SUBTOTAL $7,590,190.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTALITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
7000 6' Gravel Trail 8300 LF $15.00 $124,500.00 0.31%7001 Right-Of-Way Real Estate 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 0.07%7002 Right-Of-Way Acquisition Legal Fees 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 0.01%
7003 Trees and Shrubs 48200 SY $5.00 $241,000.00 0.60%
7004 Harvesting and Relocating of Wetland Soil 410 SY $15.00 $6,150.00 0.02%7005 Rock Gradient Control Weirs 102 EA $1,500.00 $153,000.00 0.38%7006 Log Vanes 255 EA $150.00 $38,250.00 0.09%
SUBTOTAL $598,900.00
$40,302,420.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTALITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
5000 Final Engineering Design (6% of Construction) 1 LS $2,419,000.00 $2,419,000.00 6.00%
5001 Construction Staking, Testing, & Inspection (6% of Construction) 1 LS $2,419,000.00 $2,419,000.00 6.00%
5002 Legal, Bond Council & Administrative Fees (1% of Construction) 1 LS $404,000.00 $404,000.00 1.00%SUBTOTAL $5,242,000.00
$34,158,315.00
$74,460,735.00
$79,702,735.00
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA
SCHEDULE 0 - GENERAL
SCHEDULE I - CHANNEL EARTHWORK
SCHEDULE II - REMOVAL OF CROSSINGS
ALTERNATIVE ONE
SCHEDULE IV - OPTIONAL ITEMS
SCHEDULE V - ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
Estimated Construction Total (Schedule 0 - III )
75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - III, V)
Construction Total + 75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - III, V)
BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION TOTAL (Schedules 0 - III, V + Contingency)
SCHEDULE III - REPLACEMENT OF STRUCTURES
MAY 2025
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
0001 Mobilization/Demobilization, Bonding, & Submittals 1 LS $1,285,000.00 $1,285,000 5.00%
0002 FEMA Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Preparation 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.19%0003 Preparation, Implementation, & Administration of SWPPP 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.19%
0004 Montana Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%0005 Montana Stream Protection Act (124) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0006 Montana Floodplain and Floodway Management Act Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%0007 Federal Clean Water Act (Section 404 and 10) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0008 Short-term Turbidity (318) and Water Quality Certification (401) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%0009 Traffic Control 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 0.39%
0010 Right-Of-Way Real Estate 1 LS $7,651,000.00 $7,651,000 29.80%0011 Right-Of-Way Aquisition Legal Fees 1 LS $1,530,000.00 $1,530,000 5.96%
SUBTOTAL $10,678,500.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
1000 Clearing and Grubbing 5900 SY $10.00 $59,000 0.23%1001 Demolition of Existing Buildings 11000 SF $20.00 $220,000 0.86%
1002 Main Street Tunnel Stabilization 1 EA $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000 7.79%1003 Topsoil Stripping, Stockpiling, and Replacement 500 CY $20.00 $10,000 0.04%
1004 Channel Grading 46900 CY $44.00 $2,063,600 8.04%
1005 Bank Protection - (2' D50 Rip Rap, 2' Thick) 13100 CY $80.00 $1,048,000 4.08%
1006 Bank Stabilization (Pete's Hill reach) 1 EA $5,000,000.00 $5,000,000 19.47%1007 Hydraulic Seeding 400 SY $1.75 $700 0.00%
SUBTOTAL $10,401,300.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
2000 Embankment Removal 440 CY $44.00 $19,360.00 0.08%
2001 Demolition of Large Existing Crossing Structures 7 EA $150,000.00 $1,050,000.00 4.09%
2002 Demolition of Small Existing Crossing Structures 5 EA $50,000.00 $250,000.00 0.97%
2003 Removal of Existing Utilities 1591 LF $50.00 $79,550.00 0.31%
SUBTOTAL $1,398,910.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %3000 Structural Backfill 190 CY $50.00 $9,500.00 0.04%
3001 Road Replacement 483 LF $100.00 $48,300.00 0.19%3002 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert - 20' x 8' 445 LF $6,250.00 $2,781,250.00 10.83%
3003 Steel Pedestrian Bridge - 10' Width 250 LF $1,035.00 $258,750.00 1.01%3004 Water Line Crossing 241 LF $75.00 $18,075.00 0.07%
3005 Sanitary Sewer Line Crossing 233 LF $75.00 $17,475.00 0.07%3006 Storm Sewer Line Crossing 314 LF $75.00 $23,550.00 0.09%
3007 Dry Utilities Crossing 808 LF $50.00 $40,400.00 0.16%SUBTOTAL $3,197,300.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
5000 8' Paved Commuter Trail on North Broadway 335 LF $200.00 $67,000.00 0.26%5001 6' Gravel Bank Trail - Main St. Crossing Trail 720 LF $15.00 $10,800.00 0.04%
5002 6' Gravel Bank Trail - Railroad Trail 1800 LF $15.00 $27,000.00 0.11%5003 Pedestrian Underpass - 9' x 9' Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert 60 LF $1,920.00 $115,200.00 0.45%
5004 Trees and Shrubs 11300 SY $5.00 $56,500.00 0.22%5005 Harvesting and Relocating of Wetland Soil 5510 SY $15.00 $82,650.00 0.32%
5006 Rock Gradient Control Weirs 47 EA $1,500.00 $70,500.00 0.27%5007 Log Vanes 147 EA $150.00 $22,050.00 0.09%
SUBTOTAL $451,700.00 1.76%
Estimated Construction Total (Schedule 0 - IV)$25,676,010.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
6000 Final Engineering Design (6% of Construction) 1 LS $1,540,000.00 $1,540,000.00 6.00%
6001 Construction Staking, Testing, & Inspection (6% of Construction) 1 LS $1,540,000.00 $1,540,000.00 6.00%
6002 Legal, Bond Council & Administrative Fees (1% of Construction) 1 LS $256,000.00 $256,000.00 1.00%
SUBTOTAL $3,336,000.00
75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - IV, VI)$21,759,007.50
Construction Total + 75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - IV, VI)$47,435,017.50
BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION TOTAL (Schedules 0 - IV, VI + Contingency)=$50,771,017.50
SCHEDULE III - REPLACEMENT OF MILL DITCH STRUCTURES
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA
SCHEDULE 0 - GENERAL
SCHEDULE I - CHANNEL EARTHWORK
SCHEDULE II - REMOVAL OF MILL DITCH STRUCTURES
ALTERNATIVE TWO
SCHEDULE IV - OPTIONAL ITEMS
SCHEDULE VI - ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
MARCH 2025
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
0001 Mobilization/Demobilization, Bonding, & Submittals 1 LS $952,000.00 $952,000 5.00%
0002 FEMA Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Preparation 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.26%
0003 Preparation, Implementation, & Administration of SWPPP 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.26%
0003 Montana Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0004 Montana Stream Protection Act (124) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0005 Montana Floodplain and Floodway Management Act Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0006 Federal Clean Water Act (Section 404 and 10) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0007 Short-term Turbidity (318) and Water Quality Certification (401) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0008 Traffic Control 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 1.05%
0009 Right-Of-Way Real Estate 1 LS $3,777,000.00 $3,777,000 19.83%
0010 Right-Of-Way Acquisition Legal Fees 1 LS $756,000.00 $756,000 3.97%
SUBTOTAL $5,797,500.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
1000 Clearing and Grubbing 1250 SY $10.00 $12,500 0.07%
1001 Main Street Tunnel Stabilization 1 EA $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000 10.50%
1002 Topsoil Stripping, Stockpiling, and Replacement 110 CY $20.00 $2,200 0.01%
1003 Channel Grading 4520 CY $44.00 $198,880 1.04%
1004 Bank Protection - (2' D50 Rip Rap, 2' Thick) 1330 CY $80.00 $106,400 0.56%
1005 Hydraulic Seeding 40 SY $1.75 $70 0.00%
SUBTOTAL $2,320,050.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
2000 Embankment Removal 420 CY $44.00 $18,480.00 0.10%
2001 Demolition of Large Existing Crossing Structures 9 EA $150,000.00 $1,350,000.00 7.09%
2002 Demolition of Small Existing Crossing Structures 7 EA $50,000.00 $350,000.00 1.84%
2003 Removal of Existing Utilities 1546 LF $50.00 $77,300.00 0.41%
SUBTOTAL $1,795,780.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
3000 Structural Backfill 240 CY $50.00 $12,000.00 0.06%
3001 Road Replacement 678 LF $100.00 $67,800.00 0.36%
3002 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert - 14' x 8'802 LF $6,120.00 $4,908,240.00 25.77%
3003 Steel Pedestrian Bridge - 10' Width 250 LF $1,035.00 $258,750.00 1.36%
3004 Water Line Crossing 0 LF $75.00 $0.00 0.00%
3005 Sanitary Sewer Line Crossing 248 LF $75.00 $18,600.00 0.10%
3006 Storm Sewer Line Crossing 268 LF $75.00 $20,100.00 0.11%
3007 Dry Utilities Crossing 1001 LF $50.00 $50,050.00 0.26%
3008 Interstate Crossing Replacement 1 EA $3,800,000.00 $3,800,000.00 19.95%
SUBTOTAL $9,135,540.00
Estimated Construction Total (Schedule 0 - III )$19,048,870.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
5000 Final Engineering Design (6% of Construction)1 LS $1,143,000.00 $1,143,000.00 6.00%
5001 Construction Staking, Testing, & Inspection (6% of Construction)1 LS $1,143,000.00 $1,143,000.00 6.00%
5002 Legal, Bond Council & Administrative Fees (1% of Construction)1 LS $191,000.00 $191,000.00 1.00%
SUBTOTAL $2,477,000.00
75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - III, V)$16,144,402.50
Construction Total + 75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - III, V)$35,193,272.50
SCHEDULE V - ENGINEERING, MAINTENANCE, & ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
SCHEDULE III - REPLACEMENT OF STRUCTURES
SCHEDULE 0 - GENERAL
SCHEDULE I - CHANNEL EARTHWORK
SCHEDULE II - REMOVAL OF CROSSINGS
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
ALTERNATIVE THREE
GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA
MAY 2025
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
0001 Mobilization/Demobilization, Bonding, & Submittals 1 LS $1,705,000.00 $1,705,000 5.00%
0002 FEMA Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Preparation 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.15%
0003 Preparation, Implementation, & Administration of SWPPP 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 0.15%
0003 Montana Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0004 Montana Stream Protection Act (124) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0005 Montana Floodplain and Floodway Management Act Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0006 Federal Clean Water Act (Section 404 and 10) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0007 Short-term Turbidity (318) and Water Quality Certification (401) Permitting 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500 0.01%
0008 Traffic Control 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 0.59%
0009 Right-Of-Way Real Estate 1 LS $14,168,000.00 $14,168,000 41.58%
0010 Right-Of-Way Acquisition Legal Fees 1 LS $2,833,000.00 $2,833,000 8.32%
SUBTOTAL $19,018,500.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
1000 Clearing and Grubbing 3200 SY $10.00 $32,000 0.09%
1001 Demolition of Existing Buildings 31000 SF $20.00 $620,000 1.82%
1002 Shoring and Cribs 490 LF $300.00 $147,000 0.43%
1003 Topsoil Stripping, Stockpiling, and Replacement 270 CY $20.00 $5,400 0.02%
1004 Channel Grading 9300 CY $44.00 $409,200 1.20%
1005 Bank Protection - (2' D50 Rip Rap, 2' Thick) 2200 CY $80.00 $176,000 0.52%
1006 Hydraulic Seeding 100 SY $1.75 $175 0.00%SUBTOTAL $1,389,775.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
2000 Embankment Removal 540 CY $44.00 $23,760.00 0.07%
2001 Demolition of Large Existing Crossing Structures 12 EA $150,000.00 $1,800,000.00 5.28%
2002 Demolition of Small Existing Crossing Structures 7 EA $50,000.00 $350,000.00 1.03%
2003 Removal of Existing Utilities 1965 LF $50.00 $98,250.00 0.29%
SUBTOTAL $2,272,010.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
3000 Structural Backfill 366 CY $50.00 $18,300.00 0.05%
3001 Road Replacement 860 LF $100.00 $86,000.00 0.25%
3002 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert - 14' x 8'1162 LF $6,120.00 $7,111,440.00 20.87%
3003 Steel Pedestrian Bridge - 10' Width 250 LF $1,035.00 $258,750.00 0.76%
3004 Water Line Crossing 56 LF $75.00 $4,200.00 0.01%
3005 Sanitary Sewer Line Crossing 313 LF $75.00 $23,475.00 0.07%
3006 Storm Sewer Line Crossing 385 LF $75.00 $28,875.00 0.08%
3007 Dry Utilities Crossing 1183 LF $50.00 $59,150.00 0.17%
3008 Interstate Crossing Replacement 1 EA $3,800,000.00 $3,800,000.00 11.15%SUBTOTAL $11,390,190.00
Estimated Construction Total (Schedule 0 - III )$34,070,475.00
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S
ENGINEER'S ENGINEER'S UNIT TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE %
5000 Final Engineering Design (6% of Construction)1 LS $2,045,000.00 $2,045,000.00 6.00%
5001 Construction Staking, Testing, & Inspection (6% of Construction)1 LS $2,045,000.00 $2,045,000.00 6.00%
5002 Legal, Bond Council & Administrative Fees (1% of Construction)1 LS $341,000.00 $341,000.00 1.00%SUBTOTAL $4,431,000.00
75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - III, V)$28,876,106.25
Construction Total + 75% Contingency (Bozeman Creek Restoration, Schedule 0 - III, V)$62,946,581.25
SCHEDULE III - REPLACEMENT OF STRUCTURES
SCHEDULE 0 - GENERAL
SCHEDULE I - CHANNEL EARTHWORK
SCHEDULE II - REMOVAL OF CROSSINGS
ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA
SCHEDULE V - ENGINEERING, MAINTENANCE, & ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
Establishing Expected Annual Damage (Risk) Attributable to Existing Conditions and
Four Alternative Risk Reduction Plans
The following paragraphs describe the procedures followed to estimate flood risk in the
Bozeman Creek Study Area in Bozeman, Montana. Our investigations are consistent with
the guidance found in the Institute for Water Resources’ publication entitled NED
Procedures Manual – Urban Flood Damage (March 1988). These procedures represent a
traditional Expected Annual Damages (EAD) approach that expresses flood risk as an
annual economic cost to the study area, the City of Bozeman, MT and the National
Economy of The United States. The values for EAD for each of the scenarios evaluated are
then discounted to present value terms to facilitate comparison to project first cost of
plans formulated to address flood risk.
The process includes four basic components:
1. Establish Floodplain Inventory
2. Establish Flood Depths to Frequency (or probability of occurrence)
3. Relate Flood Depths to Damage
4. Relate Flood Damage to Frequency
1. Floodplain Inventory
After reviewing maps and visually inspecting the study area, the AESI Team selected a set
of benchmark flood events to facilitate the analysis of flood risk. These are the 10, 25, 50,
100, 120 and 500 year events. The return frequencies (or, p) for these events are 0.10, 0.04,
0.02, 0.01, 0.0083 and 0.002, respectively. The approximate 125-year event (0.0083) is
identified later paragraphs as the design event. The AESI Team then used hydrologic,
hydraulic and geospatial tools to delineate each of the boundaries of the benchmark flood
events and identified the public and private properties and buildings within each.
The AESI team used Gallatin County tax maps and associated geospatial data to discern
between residential, non-residential commercial/industrial and public/common properties
within the 500-year flood extent (and by inclusion all other more frequent benchmark flood
events). The geospatial data also yield high quality estimates of first finished floor
elevations.
The tax map data also provided both assessed and estimated fair market value of both land
and structure for each asset in the floodplain. The procedures manual guiding this analysis
urges a comparison test between administratively established estimates of fair market
value and depreciated replacement cost. Accordingly, we selected a random sample of 45
residential structures and performed a replacement cost estimate for each using
HomeWyse, a commercially available residential cost estimator. Our comparison found
less than 10% variation between the Gallatin County estimates of fair market value and the
HomeWyse estimates, with a margin of error of 3.3% with a 95% level of confidence.
These investigations produced a total of 452 structures, with a total value of
$786,017,707.00 for land and improvements.
1.a. Content Values
In addition to the land and improvements, structure contents are also at risk of damage
and destruction during flood events. We divided the structure types into three basic
categories: residential, non-residential commercial/industrial and public/common
properties. For residential structures, we used a 1.5-to-1.0 ratio. For all other structures in
the floodplain, we used 2.25-to-1.0. The residential contents ratio is the result of meta-
analyses and expert elicitations conducted by USACE between 1992 and 1998. The non-
residential ratio is the result of reviews of the USACE Morganza to the Gulf Feasibility
Studies (1995-1998) and the ACT-ACF Programmatic EIS (2000). After accounting for
content values, this produces a total value of assets at risk of $1,541,187,479.00.
1.b. Depth-Damage Relationships
Depth-Damage expresses the percentage amount of total value incurred by a property for
each increment of inundation depth. We use only three Depth-Damage curves in this study
to account for the range of potential structures and to establish a “Low Benefits” and “High
Benefits” estimate. For residential structures for the High Benefit case, we use a curve for
single story structures with basements. We understand that there are a number of
multistory homes in the Bozeman Creek Study Area. However, review of the water surface
elevations for even the least frequent events do not reach a second floor, so this
simplification has no significant impact on damage variability.
For non-residential structures for the High Benefit case, we use a composite curve. The
composite curve is based on the assumption that an economically healthy urban setting
such as the City of Bozeman has a mix of non-residential establishments that varies little
versus other similarly healthy settings. There are similar mixes of establishments, from
restaurants and grocery stores to real estate offices and from auto repair shops to banks
and credit unions. This composite curve was also developed from weighted averages using
meta-data collected in Morganza to the Gulf and ACF-ACT Studies.
For the Low Benefit case, we used a conservative depth-damage model published by FEMA
in the HAZUS model.
Figure 1 depicts the three depth-damage curves used in the study.
Figure 1 – Depth Vs. Damage Curves used for Bozeman Creek study
2. Stage-Damage Calculations
Stage-Damage is calculated for each property in our floodplain. We use the Excel
=ROUNDUP function to increase any decimal value in the expected water surface elevation
for each benchmark flood event. Rounding up to the next integer accounts for seepage and
wicking in construction materials and contents. This convention also conservatively
addresses uncertainty in the actual depth of inundation inside and in the first-floor
elevation of the structure itself. This value is then multiplied by percent damage from the
curve for that property type at that elevation. For each structure and each benchmark
event:
Stage-Damage = ROUNDUP(Inundation) * LOOKUP(Depth-Damage)
3. Damage-Frequency Calculations
Damage-Frequency is also calculated for each structure and is found by multiplying the
Stage-Damage by the frequency (probability) of its occurrence. For that structure, this
calculation expresses the expected risk for that structure under that event. For example, a
residential structure with a total value including contents of $1,000,000.00, at a stage of
1.0 ft and 32% damage at the 100-year event, the single-event risk at 100-year event is
$32,000.
For each structure, we compile a curve that estimates risk across the range of benchmark
events, from the 10-year event through the 500-year. These are all summed into event
totals. The event totals are then used to calculate expected annual damages for each flood
scenario we evaluate in the study.
4. Expected Annual Damages Calculations
Expected Annual Damages (EAD), also referred to as expected annual risk, is the estimated
annual economic cost of loss that can be expected in any given year based on the
magnitude and probability of losses from all possible events. To find this value, we simply
find the area under the curve derived using the procedures described above.
ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
The following represents the economic conditions we anticipate being in place for a 50-
year planning period:
1. We assume long run full employment for the study area, with periodic short run
disruptions caused by cyclical economic downturns caused by factors unrelated to
the flood risk problem.
2. Buildings and other land improvements damaged by flooding will be rebuilt or
replaced to pre-flood conditions.
3. Building contents will be replaced with new items that duplicate or exceed the
damaged item’s utility.
4. The period of analysis will be 50 years from the date of construction, with economic
benefits beginning immediately (i.e., no interest paid during construction).
5. Future cash flows will be discounted to their lump sum present value using the 2024
10-year US Treasury rate (“risk free yield”), currently 4.10%.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing condition scenario represents the AESI Team’s best estimate of flood risk,
based on our evaluations of current H&H, structural and economic conditions. It assumes
no channel or non-structural modifications to the floodplain will be made in the current
year or in future years outside of routine maintenance of the status quo. We estimate that
the Existing Condition flood risk in present value terms ranges from about $174 million
(Low Benefit estimate) to $953 million (High Benefit estimate). Existing Conditions were
used as the basis for comparison in all scenarios evaluated in this study.
ALTERNATIVE ONE
This alternative involves increasing the Bozeman Creek corridor to pass the entire design
flood. The new corridor will be a trapezoidal flat-bottom channel with adequately sloped
sides and a capacity to carry flows up to the design event without overtopping. Structures
within the new channel will be modified to minimize constrictions that currently result in
overflows that threaten assets in both Existing and No Action scenarios. We estimate that
this plan will result in a range of residual flood risk from about $17 million to $587 million.
ALTERNATIVE TWO
Alternative Two increases the capacity of Mill Ditch and thereby reduces the flow in
Bozeman Creek during a flood event. The plan is excavating a new larger surface diversion,
allowing higher flows into the Mill Ditch channel. The Mill Ditch reach from Bozeman Creek
to its confluence with the East Gallatin channel would be enlarged to handle the increase
in flow. This includes the replacement of hydraulic structures in both Mill Ditch and
Bozeman Creek to prevent the plan from inducing damage elsewhere within the study area.
We estimate that this plan will result in a range of residual flood risk from about $12 million
to $566 million.
ALTERNATIVE THREE
This alternative replaces all hydraulic structures on Bozeman Creek (except the three
downtown tunnels) without any channel grading between them. The plan includes
significant reduction of risk associated with downtown tunnel failure by stabilizing them.
The plan also includes non-structural components by removing and relocating select
structures facing high risk. This improves flow and significantly reduces damage, but it
does not eliminate the chance of bank overtopping. We estimate that this plan will result in
a range of residual flood risk from about $105 million to $796 million.
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
This alternative replaces all hydraulic structures on Bozeman Creek without any channel
grading between them. The plan includes significant reduction of risk associated with
downtown tunnel failure by modifying or replacing them. The plan also includes non-
structural components by removing and relocating select structures facing high risk. This
improves flow and significantly reduces damage, but it does not eliminate the chance of
bank overtopping. We estimate that this plan will result in a range of residual flood risk from
about $39 million to $637 million.
SCENARIO SUMMARY
The tables below summarize the results of our investigations for the Low Benefit case.
Low Benefit Case
Total Costs
(First Costs +
PV of O&M
Costs)
Present
Value of Net
Benefits
Over 50
Years
Benefit/Cost
Ratio
No
Action/Existing
Condition
0 0 NA
Alternative One $79,702,735 $73,041,394 1.9
Alternative Two $50,771,018 $108,557,720 3.0
Alternative
Three
$35,193,273
$32,038,201 1.9
Alternative Four $62,946,581 $69,336,678 2.0
Alternative Right-of-Way Acquisition Building Removal Land Acquisition Construction Easement Building Acquisition Right-of-Way Cost Total Cost Average Cost of Land
Area (acres)* # Cost Acquisition Cost Cost With 25% Contingency Legal Fees With Legal Fees $/acre
Alternative 1 4.4 3 10,300,555.13$ 1,030,055.51$ 4,044,680.00$ 19,219,113.30$ 3,843,822.66$ 23,062,935.96$ 2,553,390.98$
Alternative 2 2.8 1 2,009,432.84$ 200,943.28$ 3,910,420.00$ 7,650,995.15$ 1,530,199.03$ 9,181,194.18$ 785,690.14$
Alternative 3 0.7 0 2,746,363.95$ 274,636.40$ -$ 3,776,250.44$ 755,250.09$ 4,531,500.52$ 4,516,533.45$
Alternative 4 1.0 3 6,626,837.58$ 662,683.76$ 4,044,680.00$ 14,167,751.67$ 2,833,550.33$ 17,001,302.00$ 7,085,867.87$
*Right-of-way acquisition area includes an estimated 10% increase for construction easement acquisition
ALTERNATIVE ONE
Address Building Value Land Value Total Value Owner Name Total Area (Acres) Right-Of-Way Area (Sq. Ft.) Right-Of-Way Area (Acres) Right-Of-Way Land Value Right-Of-Way Building Value Building Count
528 DELL PL 25,345$ 873,955$ 899,300$ BEEBE NANCY 0.82 3181 0.073 78,092.36$ -$ 0
406 E OLIVE ST 1,061,330$ 639,816$ 1,701,146$ RICCI JOHN F TRUSTEE 0.35 1645 0.038 69,856.18$ -$ 0
123 S ROUSE AVE 1,068,960$ 480,182$ 1,549,142$ SIGLER DAVID M & 0.17 819 0.019 52,327.87$ -$ 0
E BABCOCK ST 27,340$ 999,556$ 1,026,896$ FIRST SECURITY BANK OF BOZEMAN 0.51 2351 0.054 105,742.88$ -$ 0
310 E KOCH ST 1,110,002$ 979,298$ 2,089,300$ LOVE JACQUELINE P TRUSTEE 0.42 5255 0.121 278,363.66$ -$ 0
302 LINDLEY PL 373,270$ 705,824$ 1,079,094$ BRAILSFORD MATTHEW JM TRUSTEE & 0.21 789 0.018 60,516.40$ -$ 0
-$ 550,661$ 550,661$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.23 2763 0.064 -$ -$ 0
313 E STORY ST 746,243$ 593,957$ 1,340,200$ HOMES 4 RENT INC & 0.32 4114 0.095 175,111.25$ -$ 0
403 E OLIVE ST 249,602$ 443,298$ 692,900$ DEVOE DEBORAH CHRISTINE REV TRUST 0.14 187 0.004 13,322.19$ -$ 0
-$ 307,371$ 307,371$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.11 1230 0.028 -$ -$ 0
412 E TAMARACK ST 320,200$ 867,140$ 1,187,340$ STOLTZFUS RICHARD W & KAREN SCHMIDT TRUSTEES 0.58 2181 0.050 75,567.02$ -$ 0
316 LINDLEY PL 971,930$ 925,373$ 1,897,303$ LINDLEY PLACE LLC 0.36 1208 0.028 72,084.05$ -$ 0
316 E BABCOCK ST 1,416,200$ 1,469,559$ 2,885,759$ ZOEMAX LLC 0.71 9406 0.216 448,479.87$ 1,416,200.00$ 1
1010 N ROUSE AVE 352,350$ 1,745,099$ 2,097,449$ AAMO HOLDINGS LLC 2.52 361 0.008 5,740.72$ -$ 0
326 LINDLEY PL 510,770$ 765,453$ 1,276,223$ LINDLEY PLACE LLC 0.24 1163 0.027 85,374.79$ -$ 0
610 DELL PL 15,700$ 1,112,075$ 1,127,775$ DELL CONDO MASTER 0.70 1511 0.035 54,856.17$ -$ 0
425 ASPEN LN 109,770$ 649,830$ 759,600$ STEWART LUCIA TRUSTEE 0.27 1488 0.034 83,157.52$ -$ 0
308-312 E MAIN ST 819,770$ 2,715,130$ 3,534,900$ AKM 310 LLC 0.14 5550 0.128 2,468,234.53$ 819,770.00$ 1
425 E COTTONWOOD ST 66,823$ 904,677$ 971,500$ STOLZFUS RICHARD W & KAREN SCHMIDT TRUSTEES 0.61 1834 0.042 62,796.27$ -$ 0
216 LINDLEY PL 307,570$ 901,280$ 1,208,850$ CLINTON WILLIAM C & EUGENIA E TRUSTEES 0.31 1849 0.042 123,494.23$ -$ 0
511 E TAMARACK ST 812,950$ 2,771,305$ 3,584,255$ CAMO HOLDINGS LLC 5.01 17453 0.401 221,792.44$ -$ 0
314 E OLIVE ST 386,212$ 482,588$ 868,800$ LOWE JENNIFER 0.17 1418 0.033 90,717.19$ -$ 0
623 S CHURCH AVE 188,920$ 680,599$ 869,519$ JACOBY PETER & 1.24 451 0.010 5,672.04$ -$ 0
314 E STORY ST 712,960$ 767,483$ 1,480,443$ HALL H P JR 0.51 8071 0.186 279,287.27$ -$ 0
717 N CHURCH AVE 223,250$ 703,898$ 927,148$ OTT PATRICK J & CHERYL L 0.34 3538 0.081 168,410.22$ -$ 0
1104 N ROUSE AVE 469,330$ 1,749,403$ 2,218,733$ KENYON NOBLE LUMBER CO 2.67 6145 0.141 92,697.94$ -$ 0
522 DELL PL 274,036$ 830,664$ 1,104,700$ THOMPSON LENORE 0.61 2790 0.064 87,065.05$ -$ 0
322 LINDLEY PL 307,480$ 762,689$ 1,070,169$ BLACK LOA LLC 0.23 943 0.022 71,697.39$ -$ 0
306 LINDLEY PL 597,770$ 925,373$ 1,523,143$ LINDLEY LLC 0.36 1228 0.028 72,995.53$ -$ 0
417 E PEACH ST 217,345$ 805,355$ 1,022,700$ HELP CENTER INC 0.37 1302 0.030 65,134.86$ -$ 0
516 E TAMARACK ST 2,677,950$ 2,036,689$ 4,714,639$ 37 BEARS LLC 2.00 1395 0.032 32,655.45$ -$ 0
1,227,930$ 728,072$ 1,956,002$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 7.22 4260 0.098 -$ -$ 0
-$ 952,840$ 952,840$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.42 2228 0.051 -$ -$ 0
-$ 1,119,498$ 1,119,498$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 2.66 576 0.013 -$ -$ 0
330 LINDLEY PL 443,413$ 776,413$ 1,219,826$ NELSON PHILLIP & GABRIELLA 0.24 1588 0.037 118,651.98$ -$ 0
402 - 412 N MONTANA AVE 1,763,160$ 903,315$ 2,666,475$ AMANDA DRYSDALE LLC 0.93 4985 0.115 111,832.57$ -$ 0
316 N MONTANA AVE 69,641$ 436,459$ 506,100$ MIGEL MATTHEW JAMES & FAY AMANDA RUTH TRUSTEES 0.17 1477 0.034 85,572.04$ -$ 0
226 LINDLEY PL 351,451$ 871,649$ 1,223,100$ DEICHMANN HANS P & GRETA H 0.41 1902 0.044 93,102.69$ -$ 0
708 N ROUSE AVE 2,902,696$ 691,604$ 3,594,300$ PURE HOLDINGS LLC 0.65 527 0.012 12,926.73$ -$ 0
208 LINDLEY PL 484,077$ 503,623$ 987,700$ POPE JESSICA STORY TRUSTEE 0.19 413 0.010 25,661.61$ -$ 0
526 N ROUSE AVE 454,050$ 716,382$ 1,170,432$ DRYSDALE FAMILY LLC 0.53 4711 0.108 146,439.86$ -$ 0
534 N ROUSE AVE 197,725$ 405,875$ 603,600$ PERKINS KATHRYN JEAN TRUST 0.14 257 0.006 17,446.20$ -$ 0
E LAMME ST -$ 307,100$ 307,100$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.16 670 0.015 -$ -$ 0
317 E MENDENHALL ST 929,507$ 1,027,293$ 1,956,800$ SWN CREEKSIDE LLC 0.30 1594 0.037 126,029.17$ -$ 0
315 E BEALL ST 168,424$ 606,329$ 774,753$ DARR WADE 0.39 3835 0.088 137,442.61$ -$ 0
324 - 330 N MONTANA AVE 307,365$ 553,535$ 860,900$ PERLSTEIN DAVID 0.28 1747 0.040 78,983.26$ -$ 0
315 N ROUSE AVE 79,579$ 400,586$ 480,165$ NAD LLC 0.13 610 0.014 43,079.21$ -$ 0
424 N ROUSE AVE 466,711$ 380,089$ 846,800$ FOLEY JAMES D & UNDIV 50% INT 0.26 559 0.013 18,494.31$ -$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST 14,630$ 779,239$ 793,869$ MTI I LLC 0.28 2048 0.047 130,567.09$ -$ 0
414 N MONTANA AVE 1,536,338$ 867,162$ 2,403,500$ JAY BURT LLC 0.51 2490 0.057 97,992.25$ -$ 0
515 N PERKINS PL 95,012$ 602,388$ 697,400$ SPENCER CAROLINE 0.36 3487 0.080 134,131.31$ -$ 0
311 E MAIN ST 1,808,710$ 1,611,790$ 3,420,500$ BOCAR FAMILY HOLDINGS LIMIITED PARTNERSHIP 0.21 7642 0.176 1,366,601.38$ 1,808,710.00$ 1
321 E MAIN ST -$ 4,598,272$ 4,598,272$ BOZEMAN MULTI-LEVEL CONDO MASTER 0.34 1189 0.027 368,833.38$ -$ 0
501 N ROUSE AVE 187,170$ 422,630$ 609,800$ KLOSTER ADAM J 0.16 1187 0.027 72,368.66$ -$ 0
421 N ROUSE AVE 340,724$ 465,376$ 806,100$ MILLER DAVID L 0.20 1339 0.031 70,963.32$ -$ 0
320 N MONTANA AVE 57,290$ 354,505$ 411,795$ INGENUITY INVESTMENTS LLC 0.12 887 0.020 60,463.13$ -$ 0
416 E PEACH ST 491,296$ 423,404$ 914,700$ MCKENZIE WILLIAM DAVID & ROBERT 0.28 2771 0.064 98,033.93$ -$ 0
506 N ROUSE AVE -$ 491,461$ 491,461$ MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.11 1605 0.037 -$ -$ 0
220 E LAMME ST -$ 2,126,798$ 2,126,798$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 1.22 3514 0.081 -$ -$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST -$ 371,981$ 371,981$ PETERSEN HOLDINGS LLC 0.10 2861 0.066 244,895.94$ -$ 0
544 N ROUSE AVE -$ 339,715$ 339,715$ MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.10 487 0.011 -$ -$ 0
512 N ROUSE AVE 237,676$ 474,424$ 712,100$ GROUSE LLC 0.22 2061 0.047 104,389.09$ -$ 0
535 PERKINS PL 921,820$ 339,680$ 1,261,500$ SPENCER MICHAEL 0.10 1226 0.028 100,679.78$ -$ 0
530 N ROUSE AVE 416,934$ 347,666$ 764,600$ TROFTGRUBEN PAMELA K & GREGORY G TRUSTEE 0.24 1348 0.031 45,640.33$ -$ 0
501 PERKINS PL 573,440$ 570,277$ 1,143,717$ KELLEHER PETER MARVEL TRUSTEE & 0.29 2551 0.059 115,616.23$ -$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST -$ 1,579,755$ 1,579,755$ 302 EAST MENDENHALL LLC 0.42 3515 0.081 302,669.51$ -$ 0
206 N MONTANA AVE 335,554$ 547,946$ 883,500$ MITCHELL NICHOLAS 0.29 1240 0.028 54,132.33$ -$ 0
310 E BEALL ST 208,249$ 249,751$ 458,000$ RPM MONTANA LLC & 0.17 4306 0.099 148,816.24$ -$ 0
321 N ROUSE AVE 941,260$ 495,585$ 1,436,845$ LINDER CHAFFEY TRUST UTA DTD 10/2/00 0.24 1312 0.030 61,141.86$ -$ 0
327 N ROUSE AVE 112,292$ 342,308$ 454,600$ RITCHEY KATHLEEN MARIE & 0.03 881 0.020 205,713.81$ -$ 0
TOTAL 4.0 10,300,555.13$ 4,044,680.00$ 3
10% Construction Easement
Adjustment 0.4 1,030,055.51$
Real Estate Price/Acre 2,553,390.98$
19,219,113.30$
LEGAL FEES 3,843,822.66$
TOTAL 23,062,935.96$
ROW + Buildings + Construction Easement Contingency Cost
ALTERNATIVE TWO
Address Building Value Land Value Total Value Owner Name Total Area (Acres) Right-Of-Way Area (Sq. Ft.) Right-Of-Way Area (Acres) Right-Of-Way Land Value Right-Of-Way Building Value Building Count -$ 3,762$ 3,762$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 72.419 7499 0.172 -$ -$ 0
-$ 192,992$ 192,992$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.338 852 0.020 -$ -$ 0
-$ 2,101$ 2,101$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 40.319 4168 0.096 -$ -$ 0
BONNER LN -$ 304,112$ 304,112$ ICE POND TOWNHOUSE MASTER 0.909 702 0.016 5,391.85$ -$ 0
222 N BROADWAY AVE 137,910$ 254,659$ 392,569$ WILLIAMS BRANDT G & AMELIA B TRUSTEES 0.214 438 0.010 11,982.89$ -$ 0
626 E MAIN ST 13,978,810$ 22,430,218$ 36,409,028$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 12.875 25002 0.574 -$ -$ 0
505 FRONT ST 810,010$ 2,971,361$ 3,781,371$ WESTLAND ENTERPRISES INC 3.899 6104 0.140 106,808.51$ -$ 0
-$ 355,730$ 355,730$ VILLAGE DOWNTOWN PUD SUB 2.630 4990 0.115 15,494.93$ -$ 0
220 N BROADWAY AVE -$ 245,336$ 245,336$ PETERSEN NATALIE & MATTHEW 0.180 253 0.006 7,944.09$ -$ 0
ROADS -$ -$ -$ 5.973 332 0.008 -$ -$ 0
102 N BROADWAY AVE 1,435,162$ 419,438$ 1,854,600$ PAPILLON LLC 0.306 748 0.017 23,525.19$ -$ 0
-$ 2,907,619$ 2,907,619$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.844 2785 0.064 -$ -$ 0
-$ 481,614$ 481,614$ MONTANA RAIL LINK 3.997 16859 0.387 46,632.30$ -$ 0
-$ 695,701$ 695,701$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.405 3008 0.069 -$ -$ 0
803 E MAIN ST 3,910,420$ 1,462,590$ 5,373,010$ BOZEMAN 1 RE2 LLC 1.101 16152 0.371 1,462,590.00$ 3,910,420.00$ 1
318 N BROADWAY AVE 1,662,877$ 1,566,223$ 3,229,100$ WESTLAND ENTERPRISES INC 1.619 400 0.009 8,889.98$ -$ 0
-$ 1,119,498$ 1,119,498$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 2.655 1070 0.025 -$ -$ 0
177,280$ 6,342,652$ 6,519,932$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 15.196 9392 0.216 -$ -$ 0716 E MAIN ST -$ 3,052,398$ 3,052,398$ KIM EUN SIL 0.721 2255 0.052 219,037.19$ -$ 0
601 S CHURCH ST 193,170$ 637,230$ 830,400$ STEVENS MADISON P & 1.214 8396 0.193 101,135.91$ -$ 0
TOTAL 2.6 2,009,432.84$ 3,910,420.00$ 1
10% Construction Easement
Adjustment 0.3 200,943.28$
Real Estate Price/Acre 785,690.14$
7,650,995.15$
LEGAL FEES 1,530,199.03$
TOTAL 9,181,194.18$
ROW + Buildings + Construction Easement Contingency Cost
ALTERNATIVE THREE
Address Building Value Land Value Total Value Owner Name Total Area (acres)Right-Of-Way Area (ft2)Right-Of-Way Area (acres)Right-Of-Way Land Value Right-Of-Way Building Value Building Count
316 E MAIN ST 943,680.00$ 3,880,201.00$ 4,823,881.00$ FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 326 0.22 3768.62 0.09 1,495,247.24$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST -$ 371,981.00$ 371,981.00$ PETERSEN HOLDINGS LLC 0.10 1330.90 0.03 113,787.73$ 0
421 N ROUSE AVE 340,724.00$ 465,376.00$ 806,100.00$ MILLER DAVID L 0.20 1338.85 0.03 70,848.22$ 0
330 LINDLEY PL 443,413.00$ 776,413.00$ 1,219,826.00$ NELSON PHILLIP & GABRIELLA 0.24 1093.12 0.03 81,551.35$ 0
303 E MAIN ST 458,918.00$ 1,996,182.00$ 2,455,100.00$ MOUNTAIN TRAILS GALLERY BOZEMAN LLC 0.10 369.20 0.01 174,478.15$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST -$ 1,579,755.00$ 1,579,755.00$ 302 EAST MENDENHALL LLC 0.42 1506.83 0.03 129,598.70$ 0
501 N ROUSE AVE 187,170.00$ 422,630.00$ 609,800.00$ KLOSTER ADAM J 0.16 563.82 0.01 34,343.38$ 0
321 E MAIN ST -$ 4,598,272.00$ 4,598,272.00$ BOZEMAN MULTI-LEVEL CONDO MASTER 0.34 1188.83 0.03 368,377.12$ 0
E BABCOCK ST 27,340.00$ 999,556.00$ 1,026,896.00$ FIRST SECURITY BANK OF BOZEMAN 0.51 1163.68 0.03 52,270.22$ 0
220 E LAMME ST -$ 2,126,798.00$ 2,126,798.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 1.22 2751.95 0.06 -$ 0
-$ 307,371.00$ 307,371.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.11 210.49 0.00 -$ 0
401 E PEACH ST 604,690.00$ 388,534.00$ 993,224.00$ JSC INVESTMENTS LLC 0.26 514.18 0.01 17,591.26$ 0
314 E OLIVE ST 386,212.00$ 482,588.00$ 868,800.00$ LOWE JENNIFER 0.17 335.91 0.01 21,462.29$ 0
-$ 952,840.00$ 952,840.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.42 669.00 0.02 -$ 0
E LAMME ST -$ 307,100.00$ 307,100.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.16 245.70 0.01 -$ 0
313 E STORY ST 746,243.00$ 593,957.00$ 1,340,200.00$ HOMES 4 RENT INC & 0.32 400.06 0.01 17,007.69$ 0
314 E STORY ST 712,960.00$ 767,483.00$ 1,480,443.00$ HALL H P JR 0.51 598.44 0.01 20,682.75$ 0
403 E OLIVE ST 249,602.00$ 443,298.00$ 692,900.00$ DEVOE DEBORAH CHRISTINE REV TRUST 0.14 149.83 0.00 -$ 0
206 N MONTANA AVE 335,554.00$ 547,946.00$ 883,500.00$ MITCHELL NICHOLAS 0.29 269.24 0.01 11,740.80$ 0
317 E MENDENHALL ST 929,507.00$ 1,027,293.00$ 1,956,800.00$ SWN CREEKSIDE LLC 0.30 262.33 0.01 20,709.61$ 0
-$ 550,661.00$ 550,661.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.23 202.29 0.00 -$ 0E MENDENHALL ST 14,630.00$ 779,239.00$ 793,869.00$ MTI I LLC 0.28 232.32 0.01 14,791.31$ 0
406 E OLIVE ST 1,061,330.00$ 639,816.00$ 1,701,146.00$ RICCI JOHN F TRUSTEE 0.35 257.76 0.01 10,932.75$ 0
416 E PEACH ST 491,296.00$ 423,404.00$ 914,700.00$ MCKENZIE WILLIAM DAVID & ROBERT 0.28 176.62 0.00 -$ 0
511 E TAMARACK ST 812,950.00$ 2,771,305.00$ 3,584,255.00$ CAMO HOLDINGS LLC 5.01 3214.15 0.07 40,794.97$ 0
503 N ROUSE AVE 146,136.00$ 418,664.00$ 564,800.00$ EATON ANTHONY & LAUREN HARRIS TRUSTEE 0.16 96.42 0.00 -$ 0
1104 N ROUSE AVE 469,330.00$ 1,749,403.00$ 2,218,733.00$ KENYON NOBLE LUMBER CO 2.67 1548.41 0.04 23,327.14$ 0
516 E TAMARACK ST 2,677,950.00$ 2,036,689.00$ 4,714,639.00$ 37 BEARS LLC 2.00 969.96 0.02 22,676.62$ 0
424 N ROUSE AVE 466,711.00$ 380,089.00$ 846,800.00$ FOLEY JAMES D & UNDIV 50% INT 0.26 97.18 0.00 -$ 0
623 S CHURCH AVE 188,920.00$ 680,599.00$ 869,519.00$ JACOBY PETER & 1.24 329.72 0.01 4,144.63$ 0
3,640.00$ 120,337.00$ 123,977.00$ VANDEWALLE KENNETH J & KRISTIN 0.57 143.41 0.00 -$ 0
310 E KOCH ST 1,110,002.00$ 979,298.00$ 2,089,300.00$ LOVE JACQUELINE P TRUSTEE 0.42 105.48 0.00 -$ 0
414 N MONTANA AVE 1,536,338.00$ 867,162.00$ 2,403,500.00$ JAY BURT LLC 0.51 94.44 0.00 -$ 0
412 E TAMARACK ST 320,200.00$ 867,140.00$ 1,187,340.00$ STOLTZFUS RICHARD W & KAREN SCHMIDT TRUSTEES 0.58 64.86 0.00 -$ 0
705 S CHURCH AVE 394,833.00$ 699,867.00$ 1,094,700.00$ LANDERN WEST LLC 1.57 51.59 0.00 -$ 0
-$ 1,119,498.00$ 1,119,498.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 2.66 79.79 0.00 -$ 0
13,580.00$ 738,633.00$ 752,213.00$ PETERSEN HOLDINGS LLC 0.27 6.75 0.00 -$ 0
1,227,930.00$ 728,072.00$ 1,956,002.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 7.22 85.15 0.00 -$ 0
417 E PEACH ST 217,345.00$ 805,355.00$ 1,022,700.00$ HELP CENTER INC 0.37 0.20 0.00 -$ 0
506 N ROUSE AVE -$ 491,461.00$ 491,461.00$ MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.11 0.01 0.00 -$ 0
311 E MAIN ST 1,808,710.00$ 1,611,790.00$ 3,420,500.00$ BOCAR FAMILY HOLDINGS LIMIITED PARTNERSHIP 0.21 0.00 0.00 -$ 0
TOTAL 0.6 2,746,363.95$ -$ 0
10% Construction
Easement Adjustment 0.1 274,636.40$
Real Estate Price/Acre 4,516,533.45$
3,776,250.44$
LEGAL FEES 755,250.09$
TOTAL 4,531,500.52$
ROW + Buildings + Construction Easement Contingency Cost
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
Address Building Value Land Value Total Value Owner Name Total Area (acres)Right-Of-Way Area (ft2)Right-Of-Way Area (acres)Right-Of-Way Land Value Right-Of-Way Building Value Building Count
308-312 E MAIN ST 819,770.00$ 2,715,130.00$ 3,534,900.00$ AKM 310 LLC 0.14 5550.19 0.13 2,465,174.71$ 819,770.00$ 1
311 E MAIN ST 1,808,710.00$ 1,611,790.00$ 3,420,500.00$ BOCAR FAMILY HOLDINGS LIMIITED PARTNERSHIP 0.21 7642.26 0.18 1,364,906.65$ 1,808,710.00$ 1
316 E MAIN ST 943,680.00$ 3,880,201.00$ 4,823,881.00$ FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 326 0.22 3768.62 0.09 1,495,247.24$ -$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST -$ 371,981.00$ 371,981.00$ PETERSEN HOLDINGS LLC 0.10 1330.90 0.03 113,787.73$ -$ 0
421 N ROUSE AVE 340,724.00$ 465,376.00$ 806,100.00$ MILLER DAVID L 0.20 1338.85 0.03 70,848.22$ -$ 0
330 LINDLEY PL 443,413.00$ 776,413.00$ 1,219,826.00$ NELSON PHILLIP & GABRIELLA 0.24 1093.12 0.03 81,551.35$ -$ 0
303 E MAIN ST 458,918.00$ 1,996,182.00$ 2,455,100.00$ MOUNTAIN TRAILS GALLERY BOZEMAN LLC 0.10 369.20 0.01 174,478.15$ -$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST -$ 1,579,755.00$ 1,579,755.00$ 302 EAST MENDENHALL LLC 0.42 1506.83 0.03 129,598.70$ -$ 0
501 N ROUSE AVE 187,170.00$ 422,630.00$ 609,800.00$ KLOSTER ADAM J 0.16 563.82 0.01 34,343.38$ -$ 0
321 E MAIN ST -$ 4,598,272.00$ 4,598,272.00$ BOZEMAN MULTI-LEVEL CONDO MASTER 0.34 1188.83 0.03 368,377.12$ -$ 0
E BABCOCK ST 27,340.00$ 999,556.00$ 1,026,896.00$ FIRST SECURITY BANK OF BOZEMAN 0.51 1163.68 0.03 52,270.22$ -$ 0
220 E LAMME ST -$ 2,126,798.00$ 2,126,798.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 1.22 2751.95 0.06 -$ -$ 0
-$ 307,371.00$ 307,371.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.11 210.49 0.00 -$ -$ 0
401 E PEACH ST 604,690.00$ 388,534.00$ 993,224.00$ JSC INVESTMENTS LLC 0.26 514.18 0.01 17,591.26$ -$ 0
314 E OLIVE ST 386,212.00$ 482,588.00$ 868,800.00$ LOWE JENNIFER 0.17 335.91 0.01 21,462.29$ -$ 0
-$ 952,840.00$ 952,840.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.42 669.00 0.02 -$ -$ 0
E LAMME ST -$ 307,100.00$ 307,100.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.16 245.70 0.01 -$ -$ 0
316 E BABCOCK ST 1,416,200.00$ 1,469,559.00$ 2,885,759.00$ ZOEMAX LLC 0.71 1058.20 0.02 50,392.26$ 1,416,200.00$ 1
313 E STORY ST 746,243.00$ 593,957.00$ 1,340,200.00$ HOMES 4 RENT INC & 0.32 400.06 0.01 17,007.69$ -$ 0
314 E STORY ST 712,960.00$ 767,483.00$ 1,480,443.00$ HALL H P JR 0.51 598.44 0.01 20,682.75$ -$ 0
403 E OLIVE ST 249,602.00$ 443,298.00$ 692,900.00$ DEVOE DEBORAH CHRISTINE REV TRUST 0.14 149.83 0.00 -$ -$ 0206 N MONTANA AVE 335,554.00$ 547,946.00$ 883,500.00$ MITCHELL NICHOLAS 0.29 269.24 0.01 11,740.80$ -$ 0
317 E MENDENHALL ST 929,507.00$ 1,027,293.00$ 1,956,800.00$ SWN CREEKSIDE LLC 0.30 262.33 0.01 20,709.61$ -$ 0
-$ 550,661.00$ 550,661.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 0.23 202.29 0.00 -$ -$ 0
E MENDENHALL ST 14,630.00$ 779,239.00$ 793,869.00$ MTI I LLC 0.28 232.32 0.01 14,791.31$ -$ 0
406 E OLIVE ST 1,061,330.00$ 639,816.00$ 1,701,146.00$ RICCI JOHN F TRUSTEE 0.35 257.76 0.01 10,932.75$ -$ 0
416 E PEACH ST 491,296.00$ 423,404.00$ 914,700.00$ MCKENZIE WILLIAM DAVID & ROBERT 0.28 176.62 0.00 -$ -$ 0
511 E TAMARACK ST 812,950.00$ 2,771,305.00$ 3,584,255.00$ CAMO HOLDINGS LLC 5.01 3214.15 0.07 40,794.97$ -$ 0
503 N ROUSE AVE 146,136.00$ 418,664.00$ 564,800.00$ EATON ANTHONY & LAUREN HARRIS TRUSTEE 0.16 96.42 0.00 -$ -$ 0
1104 N ROUSE AVE 469,330.00$ 1,749,403.00$ 2,218,733.00$ KENYON NOBLE LUMBER CO 2.67 1548.41 0.04 23,327.14$ -$ 0
516 E TAMARACK ST 2,677,950.00$ 2,036,689.00$ 4,714,639.00$ 37 BEARS LLC 2.00 969.96 0.02 22,676.62$ -$ 0
424 N ROUSE AVE 466,711.00$ 380,089.00$ 846,800.00$ FOLEY JAMES D & UNDIV 50% INT 0.26 97.18 0.00 -$ -$ 0
623 S CHURCH AVE 188,920.00$ 680,599.00$ 869,519.00$ JACOBY PETER & 1.24 329.72 0.01 4,144.63$ -$ 0
3,640.00$ 120,337.00$ 123,977.00$ VANDEWALLE KENNETH J & KRISTIN 0.57 143.41 0.00 -$ -$ 0
310 E KOCH ST 1,110,002.00$ 979,298.00$ 2,089,300.00$ LOVE JACQUELINE P TRUSTEE 0.42 105.48 0.00 -$ -$ 0
414 N MONTANA AVE 1,536,338.00$ 867,162.00$ 2,403,500.00$ JAY BURT LLC 0.51 94.44 0.00 -$ -$ 0
412 E TAMARACK ST 320,200.00$ 867,140.00$ 1,187,340.00$ STOLTZFUS RICHARD W & KAREN SCHMIDT TRUSTEES 0.58 64.86 0.00 -$ -$ 0
705 S CHURCH AVE 394,833.00$ 699,867.00$ 1,094,700.00$ LANDERN WEST LLC 1.57 51.59 0.00 -$ -$ 0
-$ 1,119,498.00$ 1,119,498.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 2.66 79.79 0.00 -$ -$ 0
13,580.00$ 738,633.00$ 752,213.00$ PETERSEN HOLDINGS LLC 0.27 6.75 0.00 -$ -$ 0
1,227,930.00$ 728,072.00$ 1,956,002.00$ CITY OF BOZEMAN 7.22 85.15 0.00 -$ -$ 0
417 E PEACH ST 217,345.00$ 805,355.00$ 1,022,700.00$ HELP CENTER INC 0.37 0.20 0.00 -$ -$ 0
506 N ROUSE AVE -$ 491,461.00$ 491,461.00$ MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.11 0.01 0.00 -$ -$ 0
311 E MAIN ST 1,808,710.00$ 1,611,790.00$ 3,420,500.00$ BOCAR FAMILY HOLDINGS LIMIITED PARTNERSHIP 0.21 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ 0
TOTAL 0.9 6,626,837.58$ 4,044,680.00$ 3
10% Construction
Easement Adjustment 0.1 662,683.76$
Real Estate Price/Acre 7,085,867.87$
14,167,751.67$
LEGAL FEES 2,833,550.33$
TOTAL 17,001,302.00$
ROW + Buildings + Construction Easement Contingency Cost
FIGURE: C-1DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 12/19/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\Building Inundations\23-157 Building Inundations.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Inundated Structure100-Year Event - Existing Conditions Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
STRUCTURE INUNDATION
NOTE: 367 STRUCTURES ARE INUNDATED DURING THE 1%
ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT
FIGURE: C-3DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 12/19/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\Building Inundations\23-157 Building Inundations.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Inundated Structure100-Year Event - Alternative One Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
STRUCTURE INUNDATION
NOTE: 27 STRUCTURES ARE INUNDATED DURING THE 1%
ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT
FIGURE: C-4DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 12/19/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\Building Inundations\23-157 Building Inundations.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Inundated Structure100-Year Event - Alternative Two Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
STRUCTURE INUNDATION
NOTE: 45 STRUCTURES ARE INUNDATED DURING THE 1%
ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT
FIGURE: C-5DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/19/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\Building Inundations\23-157 Building Inundations.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Inundated Structure100-Year Event - Alternative Three Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2.5 ft
2.5 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
STRUCTURE INUNDATION
NOTE: 307 STRUCTURES ARE INUNDATED DURING THE 1%ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT
FIGURE: C-6DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/26/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\Building Inundations\23-157 Existing Inundations.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Inundated Structure100-Year Event - Alternative Four Depth
0 - 0.5 ft
0.5 - 1 ft
1 - 2 ft
2 - 5 ft
5 - 10 ft
STRUCTURE INUNDATION
NOTE: 174 STRUCTURES ARE INUNDATED DURING THE 1%
ANNUAL EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY EVENT
Building Land Total 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year0 719 S CHURCH AVE 1.34 -$ 876,600$ 876,600$ DAHLINGER COURT CONDO MASTER Residential Building 1.46 1.01 0.84 1.20 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.75 0.63 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.93 1.13 1.02 0.92 0.56 0.14 1.13 0.72 0.62 0.12 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.70 0.58 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.73 0.62 0.10 0.00 0.00
1 705 S CHURCH AVE 1.57 394,833$ 699,867$ 1,094,700$ LANDERN WEST LLC Residential Building 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.005 623 S CHURCH AVE 1.24 188,920$ 680,599$ 869,519$ JACOBY PETER & Residential Building 1.54 0.88 0.69 0.49 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.87 0.67 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 0.85 0.66 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.32 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.28 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 613 S CHURCH ST 0.95 155,690$ 552,010$ 707,700$ WILKE ROBERT STEVEN Misc Building 4.19 3.52 3.33 3.10 2.61 1.96 4.13 3.47 3.27 2.93 2.56 1.91 2.38 1.44 1.24 1.03 0.81 0.00 4.07 3.44 3.25 2.91 2.56 1.99 3.46 2.88 2.66 2.23 1.78 1.09 3.46 2.87 2.69 2.28 1.81 1.078 610 DELL PL 0.70 15,700$ 1,112,075$ 1,127,775$ DELL CONDO MASTER Residential Building 1.46 1.26 1.17 1.07 0.49 0.00 1.46 1.26 1.17 0.92 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.48 1.41 1.17 0.90 0.19 1.72 1.49 1.42 1.24 0.97 0.30
13 601 S CHURCH ST 1.21 193,170$ 637,230$ 830,400$ STEVENS MADISON P & Residential Building 0.73 0.48 0.43 0.30 0.28 0.00 0.73 0.44 0.39 0.38 0.28 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.10 1.04 0.93 0.68 0.30 0.46 0.38 0.37 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.35 0.33 0.17 0.00 0.0014 604 DELL PL 0.34 93,363$ 648,237$ 741,600$ BEEBE NANCY Residential Building 0.27 0.25 0.23 0.24 0.07 0.00 0.30 0.27 0.25 0.22 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.25 0.25 0.21 0.17 0.00 0.35 0.30 0.29 0.27 0.23 0.00
16 528 DELL PL 0.82 25,345$ 873,955$ 899,300$ BEEBE NANCY Residential Building 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.43 0.42 0.39 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.47 0.46 0.43 0.40 0.00 0.51 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.40 0.0017 104 N CHURCH ST 0.12 -$ 321,392$ 321,392$ H-THORNE CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.60 0.54 0.45 0.38 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.34 0.27 0.15 0.08 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 214 E STORY ST 0.56 1,257,758$ 940,842$ 2,198,600$ MJC STORY LLC Residential Building 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.29 0.26 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.32 0.31 0.25 0.14 0.00 0.44 0.33 0.33 0.28 0.19 0.0021 306 E STORY ST 0.59 1,233,790$ 781,617$ 2,015,407$ BOSLEY THOMAS CLARK & ROBIN Residential Building 0.48 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 1.37 0.62 0.58 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.66 0.65 0.60 0.34 0.00 1.32 0.63 0.63 0.57 0.41 0.00
22 404 E STORY ST 0.13 316,416$ 426,784$ 743,200$ STEINHAUER EDWARD K Residential Building 0.60 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.84 2.16 1.83 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.44 1.26 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 1.10 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.0023 416 E STORY ST 0.18 331,102$ 497,898$ 829,000$ STARK JENNIFER & JEREMY Residential Building 2.38 1.80 1.57 1.66 0.39 0.00 4.22 3.58 3.26 2.47 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.90 2.80 2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.77 2.60 2.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
24 420 E STORY ST 0.18 382,902$ 497,898$ 880,800$ VAN SLYKE STEPHEN C & Residential Building 2.98 2.25 1.99 2.10 0.62 0.00 4.43 3.77 3.43 2.61 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.87 2.72 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.97 2.74 2.16 0.00 0.00 0.0025 428 E STORY ST 0.28 378,066$ 600,234$ 978,300$ ASBURY THOMAS SCOTT Residential Building 2.69 1.97 1.70 1.81 0.26 0.00 4.10 3.41 3.07 2.25 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.69 2.54 1.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.61 2.38 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
26 306 E STORY ST 0.59 1,233,790$ 781,617$ 2,015,407$ BOSLEY THOMAS CLARK & ROBIN Residential Building 0.34 0.10 0.08 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.25 0.23 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.25 0.24 0.20 0.05 0.0027 410 E STORY RD 0.18 273,384$ 494,416$ 767,800$ STEINHAUER EDWARD Residential Building 0.57 0.13 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 2.53 2.01 1.74 1.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 1.28 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 1.15 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
28 425 E STORY ST 0.12 250,986$ 407,914$ 658,900$ HYDE BRETT & AMY A Residential Building 0.93 0.65 0.55 0.53 0.21 0.00 1.26 0.94 0.81 0.54 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.37 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.31 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.0029 429 E STORY ST 0.11 566,457$ 394,143$ 960,600$ FORSYTHE JOSHUA & ROBYN Residential Building 0.87 0.58 0.49 0.47 0.19 0.00 1.28 0.91 0.76 0.45 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.31 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.26 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
30 523 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.19 291,769$ 461,531$ 753,300$ HALVORSON STEPHEN E Residential Building 0.91 0.81 0.79 0.60 0.56 0.14 0.96 0.84 0.80 0.70 0.56 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.20 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
31 421 E STORY RD 0.12 319,986$ 407,914$ 727,900$ CAMPANELLI MARK Residential Building 1.04 0.79 0.70 0.68 0.33 0.00 1.41 1.10 0.98 0.73 0.48 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.50 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.50 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
32 405 E STORY ST 0.12 251,945$ 416,755$ 668,700$ KINSEY MARGARET L Residential Building 0.83 0.54 0.43 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.12 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
35 409 E STORY ST 0.12 372,386$ 407,914$ 780,300$ MCCALLUM BRUCE D & MARY LOUISE TRUSTEE Residential Building 1.72 1.36 1.24 1.22 0.74 0.37 1.20 0.85 0.68 0.35 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0036 616 E LAMME ST 0.19 135,925$ 556,575$ 692,500$ HOLZNAGEL CARL T Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.34 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.36 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
38 413 E STORY ST 0.12 293,486$ 407,914$ 701,400$ GRIMM KRISTEN & Residential Building 2.01 1.68 1.57 1.55 1.12 0.81 1.41 1.16 1.03 0.77 0.45 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.61 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.55 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.0039 417 E STORY ST 0.12 228,386$ 407,914$ 636,300$ AMENT ROBERT J Misc Building 1.00 0.80 0.74 0.73 0.47 0.10 0.88 0.74 0.69 0.57 0.46 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.50 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.47 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
40 211 E STORY RD 0.26 1,061,775$ 575,325$ 1,637,100$ KOSKI CRAIG & KRISTINE TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0042 415 S CHURCH ST 0.17 340,318$ 480,182$ 820,500$ WHITMAN DONNA & Residential Building 0.55 0.37 0.32 0.31 0.12 0.00 0.40 0.31 0.28 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.12 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
43 412 BOGERT PL 0.18 419,978$ 475,322$ 895,300$ MCCALLUM BRUCE D & MARY LOUISE TRUSTEE Misc Building 1.69 1.43 1.34 1.31 0.94 0.58 1.22 1.09 1.04 0.95 0.86 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.86 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.87 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.0044 219 E STORY ST 0.27 579,570$ 578,989$ 1,158,559$ BROWN ANA M & Residential Building 0.80 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.29 0.28 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
45 406 BOGERT PL 0.21 324,418$ 520,282$ 844,700$ MCCALLUM WILLIAM L & MARIAH A & MATHEW B Misc Building 0.94 0.70 0.61 0.59 0.23 0.00 0.60 0.45 0.39 0.27 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.0049 418 BOGERT PL 0.13 296,183$ 448,617$ 744,800$ WILLIAMS NATALIE ELLEN Residential Building 1.15 0.92 0.84 0.82 0.51 0.21 0.85 0.73 0.69 0.60 0.51 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.50 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.51 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00
50 216 E KOCH ST 0.31 926,930$ 623,974$ 1,550,904$ MITCHELL B STEWART JR & KAREN R Residential Building 0.67 0.52 0.47 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0052 410 S CHURCH AVE 0.19 1,767,270$ 676,624$ 2,443,894$ HUNTER ROBERT M & MARY M TRUSTEE Residential Building 1.66 1.23 1.17 1.16 0.44 0.00 1.89 1.24 1.17 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.19 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
53 304 E KOCH ST 0.32 460,370$ 623,974$ 1,084,344$ FEHER PAOLA TRUSTEE Residential Building 1.08 0.93 0.89 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0054 404 S CHURCH AVE 0.18 639,450$ 683,912$ 1,323,362$ SEMONES LINDA G Misc Building 0.78 0.57 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
56 336 S CHURCH ST 0.26 208,136$ 815,764$ 1,023,900$ PENTTILA THERESA L REV LIVING TRUST Residential Building 0.21 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.25 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0057 330 LINDLEY PL 0.24 443,413$ 776,413$ 1,219,826$ NELSON PHILLIP & GABRIELLA Residential Building 0.56 0.49 0.46 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
58 323 S WALLACE AVE 0.51 935,930$ 925,000$ 1,860,930$ BALL JEFFREY A & KATHERINE A Residential Building 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0059 317 S BOZEMAN AVE 0.12 316,076$ 376,024$ 692,100$ SCHNEIDER JOSEPH & BARNES CYNTHIA Residential Building 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.18 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
61 307 S BOZEMAN AVE 0.20 593,011$ 464,489$ 1,057,500$ BRYAN ROBERT M Residential Building 0.43 0.35 0.33 0.21 0.07 0.00 0.60 0.41 0.38 0.32 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0062 7.22 1,227,930$ 728,072$ 1,956,002$ CITY OF BOZEMAN Misc Building 1.01 0.76 0.68 0.79 0.32 0.03 0.72 0.58 0.52 0.41 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.20 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
63 226 S BLACK AVE 0.31 638,321$ 563,979$ 1,202,300$ SCATES JULIE A Residential Building 0.53 0.46 0.44 0.33 0.21 0.00 0.62 0.52 0.49 0.44 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0066 224 S BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 282,055$ 424,845$ 706,900$ DUNAYER ALLAN S & JOY CHRISTINE E Residential Building 0.25 0.18 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.71 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
67 313 E STORY ST 0.32 746,243$ 593,957$ 1,340,200$ HOMES 4 RENT INC & Residential Building 0.60 0.70 0.61 0.67 0.95 0.00 2.15 2.10 2.10 2.09 0.25 0.00 4.78 3.68 3.47 3.39 2.93 2.31 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.06 2.39 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.29 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
69 224 S CHURCH AVE 0.21 145,394$ 546,606$ 692,000$ CELAR LOUIS JOHN Misc Building 0.45 0.34 0.30 0.27 0.05 0.00 0.70 0.49 0.43 0.30 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70 216 LINDLEY PL 0.31 307,570$ 901,280$ 1,208,850$ CLINTON WILLIAM C & EUGENIA E TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.46 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
71 220 S CHURCH ST 0.18 401,111$ 495,589$ 896,700$ BLACK JAMES & RENATA Residential Building 0.88 0.77 0.74 0.72 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.94 0.88 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0072 220 S BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 452,080$ 424,845$ 876,925$ EISEL JUSTIN & Residential Building 0.74 0.70 0.68 0.56 0.44 0.00 0.86 0.83 0.80 0.72 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
76 214 S CHURCH AVE 0.27 343,967$ 591,133$ 935,100$ SCARFF STEVEN R & JOAN S Residential Building 0.18 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.49 0.43 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0081 211 LINDLEY PL 0.10 417,626$ 394,574$ 812,200$ BUNN VICTORIA J & Misc Building 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.39 0.36 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
82 210 S CHURCH AVE 0.27 207,467$ 591,133$ 798,600$ NEWMAN CHRISTOPHER C & WENDY P Residential Building 0.51 0.37 0.34 0.31 0.09 0.00 0.76 0.58 0.51 0.35 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.31 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0087 205 S CHURCH AVE 0.25 623,840$ 766,846$ 1,390,686$ BUCK ALEXANDER KNAPP III & ALLISON ANN Residential Building 1.21 0.76 0.91 0.60 0.30 0.00 0.95 0.58 0.46 0.32 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
88 207 LINDLEY PL 0.12 466,690$ 428,206$ 894,896$ EDWARDS REBECCA KAY & Residential Building 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.51 0.42 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0089 314 E OLIVE ST 0.17 386,212$ 482,588$ 868,800$ LOWE JENNIFER Misc Building 0.68 0.38 0.27 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.61 1.48 1.45 1.37 1.29 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.67 0.60 0.40 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
91 206 S CHURCH AVE 0.14 285,832$ 445,968$ 731,800$ SCHROEDER BONITA E Residential Building 0.64 0.52 0.48 0.45 0.08 0.00 0.71 0.56 0.50 0.34 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0092 203 S CHURCH ST 0.23 288,314$ 555,686$ 844,000$ RED STAR II LLC Misc Building 1.34 1.16 1.08 1.01 0.80 0.00 1.50 1.28 1.20 1.09 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.90 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
94 218 E OLIVE ST 0.15 323,586$ 436,514$ 760,100$ ROBERTS MARK N Residential Building 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.40 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0096 514 E OLIVE ST 0.14 269,053$ 422,547$ 691,600$ WENTZEL ROSETTA Residential Building 0.51 0.40 0.37 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.28 0.22 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
99 202 S CHURCH ST 0.19 455,110$ 445,968$ 901,078$ CHOLIVE LLC Residential Building 1.18 1.04 1.05 1.02 0.55 0.00 1.38 1.14 1.08 0.92 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00102 406 E OLIVE ST 0.35 1,061,330$ 639,816$ 1,701,146$ RICCI JOHN F TRUSTEE Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.32 0.26 0.21 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
103 120 S BLACK AVE 0.36 7,041,426$ 1,909,474$ 8,950,900$ ADR INVESTMENTS I LLC & Commercial Building 0.20 0.12 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.21 0.18 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00104 123 S ROUSE AVE 0.17 1,068,960$ 480,182$ 1,549,142$ SIGLER DAVID M & Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.35 0.31 0.24 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
106 119 S CHURCH ST 0.34 671,860$ 629,435$ 1,301,295$ DREYER PROPERTIES LLC Residential Building 1.74 1.33 1.20 1.12 0.68 0.00 2.95 2.59 2.47 2.26 2.11 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.45 1.97 1.82 1.61 1.41 0.00 1.53 1.14 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00107 213 E OLIVE ST 0.20 263,305$ 509,495$ 772,800$ ROBERTS MARK N JR Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.86 0.83 0.77 0.71 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.57 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
108 403 E OLIVE ST 0.14 249,602$ 443,298$ 692,900$ DEVOE DEBORAH CHRISTINE REV TRUST Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.53 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00110 307 E OLIVE ST 0.16 320,493$ 467,907$ 788,400$ CAREY MICHAEL L & KATHY Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.21 0.16 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
112 213 E OLIVE ST 0.20 263,305$ 509,495$ 772,800$ ROBERTS MARK N JR Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.53 0.51 0.49 0.45 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.34 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00116 115 S CHURCH AVE 0.17 631,018$ 480,182$ 1,111,200$ MOMO FAMILY LLC Misc Building 1.67 1.38 1.28 1.26 0.90 0.00 1.42 1.29 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 1.08 1.04 0.94 0.86 0.00 0.86 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
117 116 S ROUSE AVE 0.14 208,125$ 444,375$ 652,500$ GEYER LUKAS & Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
118 10 E BABCOCK ST 2.11 -$ 10,015,038$ 10,015,038$ U S A FED BLDG Commercial Building 1.71 1.10 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 1.84 1.82 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
120 111 S CHURCH AVE 0.18 -$ 485,662$ 485,662$ RAD HOLDINGS LLC Residential Building 1.34 1.13 1.06 1.08 0.78 0.00 1.33 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.06 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 1.09 1.04 0.93 0.85 0.00 0.74 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
122 107 S CHURCH AVE 0.10 564,520$ 381,367$ 945,887$ BROTHER VENTURES LLC Residential Building 0.68 0.47 0.40 0.39 0.12 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.74 0.62 0.52 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.44 0.33 0.17 0.05 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00123 316 E BABCOCK ST 0.71 1,416,200$ 1,469,559$ 2,885,759$ ZOEMAX LLC Commercial Building 4.80 4.58 4.52 4.42 4.31 3.66 5.11 5.01 4.98 4.92 4.86 4.80 4.64 4.04 3.84 3.48 3.07 2.49 3.78 2.57 2.06 1.30 0.19 0.00 5.02 4.81 4.76 4.64 4.50 4.19 5.75 5.54 5.44 5.14 4.55 3.82
124 110 S BOZEMAN AVE 0.13 388,230$ 389,870$ 778,100$ BZN TWIN 110 LLC Residential Building 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.60 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.41 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00126 404 E BABCOCK ST 0.21 671,000$ 1,342,716$ 2,013,716$ RT404 BABCOCK LLC Commercial Building 0.44 0.24 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
127 137 E BABCOCK ST 0.21 890,154$ 2,140,346$ 3,030,500$ 137 E BABCOCK LLC Commercial Building 0.20 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.19 0.17 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00128 519 E BABCOCK ST 0.18 169,290$ 1,202,241$ 1,371,531$ S2K MILLER BABCOCK LLC Residential Building 0.52 0.38 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.58 0.56 0.51 0.46 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.38 0.33 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
129 523 E BABCOCK ST 0.18 808,062$ 1,202,138$ 2,010,200$ S2K MILLER BABCOCK LLC Residential Building 0.22 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.43 0.41 0.38 0.34 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.35 0.31 0.26 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00130 511 E BABCOCK ST 0.18 263,000$ 651,483$ 914,483$ S2K MILLER BABCOCK LLC Misc Building 0.19 0.10 0.06 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.13 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
131 208 E MAIN ST 1.18 20,254,400$ 11,068,719$ 31,323,119$ FIRST SECURITY BANK Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.64 0.58 0.47 0.36 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00132 32 S ROUSE AVE 0.62 2,279,530$ 2,754,145$ 5,033,675$ SALVATION ARMY Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.28 0.25 0.18 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
133 25 S BLACK AVE 0.63 1,218,070$ 4,377,365$ 5,595,435$ OWENHOUSE HARDWARE CO Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00134 140 E MAIN ST 0.19 4,454,732$ 3,209,268$ 7,664,000$ 702 LLC & Commercial Building 0.33 0.21 0.19 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.23 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
135 316 E MAIN ST 0.22 943,680$ 3,880,201$ 4,823,881$ FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES 326 Commercial Building 0.56 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 1.52 1.46 1.36 1.26 1.12 1.07 0.28 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.38 0.32 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.25 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00136 512 E MAIN ST 0.53 315,672$ 2,542,228$ 2,857,900$ MAGNIFICENT SEVEN LLC Commercial Building 0.77 0.76 0.75 0.80 0.00 0.00 1.19 0.42 0.37 0.23 0.20 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.17 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
137 544 E MAIN ST 0.54 795,913$ 2,516,987$ 3,312,900$ WAM DEV GROUP LLC Commercial Building 0.41 0.38 0.37 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.34 0.26 0.21 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.14 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00138 230 E MAIN ST 0.10 1,316,724$ 2,019,376$ 3,336,100$ ARCHROCK LLC Commercial Building 0.47 0.15 0.06 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.65 1.44 1.38 1.27 1.17 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
139 424 E MAIN ST 0.82 26,080$ 3,381,463$ 3,407,543$ JACOBS CROSSING CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.14 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00140 104 E MAIN ST 0.37 7,845,400$ 5,012,561$ 12,857,961$ 104 E MAIN LLC Commercial Building 0.47 0.42 0.41 0.44 0.36 0.18 0.75 0.60 0.56 0.49 0.43 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.27 0.23 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.07 0.00
141 424 E MAIN ST 0.82 26,080$ 3,381,463$ 3,407,543$ JACOBS CROSSING CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.53 0.28 0.21 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.37 0.97 0.85 0.64 0.48 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.38 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00142 222 E MAIN ST 0.24 2,599,389$ 3,665,011$ 6,264,400$ MVGR LAND LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.72 0.66 0.55 0.45 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
144 402 E MAIN ST 0.37 9,100$ 1,917,956$ 1,927,056$ BLACKWOOD BLDG CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.58 0.49 0.32 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00145 238-246 E MAIN ST 0.26 514,729$ 3,787,371$ 4,302,100$ AKM 238 LLC Commercial Building 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.35 1.29 1.19 1.10 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
146 308-312 E MAIN ST 0.14 819,770$ 2,715,130$ 3,534,900$ AKM 310 LLC Commercial Building 0.66 0.25 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.00 2.03 1.86 1.79 1.70 1.62 1.46 4.81 4.23 4.03 3.64 3.23 2.69 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.26 0.20 0.10 0.02 0.00 6.06 5.49 5.27 4.82 4.19 3.57
147 234 E MAIN ST 0.10 294,060$ 2,019,376$ 2,313,436$ 234 E MAIN ST LLC Commercial Building 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.34 1.14 1.08 0.98 0.88 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
149 502 E MAIN ST 0.21 135,662$ 1,202,138$ 1,337,800$ JUST PLAIN LOCAL LLC Commercial Building 0.34 0.14 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.45 0.40 0.29 0.23 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
150 44 E MAIN ST 0.14 2,336,351$ 2,615,449$ 4,951,800$ 400 MARION INC Commercial Building 0.52 0.44 0.43 0.34 0.31 0.15 0.67 0.54 0.51 0.46 0.39 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.25 0.23 0.17 0.14 0.00 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.00151 529 E MAIN ST 0.38 611,053$ 1,860,447$ 2,471,500$ FLAT WATER PROPERTIES LLC Commercial Building 0.24 0.11 0.05 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.43 0.39 0.32 0.25 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.29 0.22 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
152 6 and 14 N CHURCH ST 1.00 34,250$ 3,802,684$ 3,836,934$ CHURCH & MAIN CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.35 0.18 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.25 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.20 0.13 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00153 435 E MAIN ST 0.07 364,890$ 629,710$ 994,600$ MCPHIE HOLDINGS LLC Commercial Building 0.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.48 0.41 0.27 0.15 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
154 437 E MAIN ST 0.12 188,939$ 917,761$ 1,106,700$ EVE DARRELL Commercial Building 0.55 0.20 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.60 0.54 0.41 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.17 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00155 443 E MAIN ST 0.16 293,667$ 1,122,933$ 1,416,600$ WIMPYS PALACE LLC Commercial Building 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.44 0.37 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
156 611 E MAIN ST 1.15 173,998$ 4,228,702$ 4,402,700$ 611 EAST MAIN LLC & UND 50% INT Commercial Building 1.02 0.90 0.84 0.89 0.00 0.00 1.16 1.09 1.07 1.02 0.98 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.89 0.84 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00157 233 E MAIN ST 0.19 7,642,160$ 3,199,140$ 10,841,300$ OSBORNE BUILDING LLC Commercial Building 8.28 8.28 8.24 8.05 6.73 4.42 8.99 8.83 8.78 8.69 8.60 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 1.63 1.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.55 8.36 7.55 7.02 6.29 3.57 3.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
158 803 E MAIN ST 1.10 3,910,420$ 1,462,590$ 5,373,010$ BOZEMAN 1 RE2 LLC Commercial Building 0.48 0.34 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.55 0.54 0.47 0.41 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.36 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00159 777 E MAIN ST 1.33 5,871,224$ 5,060,176$ 10,931,400$ MAIN ST HOLDINGS LLC Commercial Building 0.46 0.37 0.26 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.20 0.16 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.07 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
160 35-37 E MAIN ST 0.27 2,949,410$ 4,035,590$ 6,985,000$ CGS GROUP LTD Commercial Building 0.40 0.31 0.29 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.45 0.34 0.32 0.27 0.19 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00161 311 E MAIN ST 0.21 1,808,710$ 1,611,790$ 3,420,500$ BOCAR FAMILY HOLDINGS LIMIITED PARTNERSHIP Commercial Building 1.29 1.18 1.14 1.24 0.98 0.73 1.01 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.84 0.80 3.35 2.77 2.56 2.14 1.70 1.10 1.10 0.42 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.17 0.88 0.66 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
162 303 E MAIN ST 0.10 458,918$ 1,996,182$ 2,455,100$ MOUNTAIN TRAILS GALLERY BOZEMAN LLC Commercial Building 2.40 2.36 2.33 2.36 2.00 1.58 2.44 2.35 2.33 2.29 2.26 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.91 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.01 1.67 1.45 1.09 0.06 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00163 411 E MAIN ST 0.48 184,871$ 2,333,329$ 2,518,200$ SLEEPY EYE LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.28 0.26 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
164 219 E MAIN ST 0.33 6,185,425$ 4,626,275$ 10,811,700$ F & H LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.46 0.44 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.35 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00165 321 E MAIN ST 0.34 -$ 4,598,272$ 4,598,272$ BOZEMAN MULTI-LEVEL CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.14 0.04 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.70 0.51 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
166 241 E MAIN ST 0.17 1,910,490$ 2,919,710$ 4,830,200$ TWO SISTERS HOLDING COMPANY LLC Commercial Building 1.08 1.12 1.10 1.00 0.40 0.00 1.37 1.28 1.26 1.22 1.18 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 1.18 0.82 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00167 225 E MAIN ST 0.09 2,517,910$ 1,907,925$ 4,425,835$ GALLATIN POST 14 Commercial Building 2.84 2.87 2.86 2.91 2.46 0.00 4.16 4.02 3.99 3.93 3.89 3.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.73 3.63 3.23 2.95 2.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
168 223 E MAIN ST 0.10 2,876,590$ 1,996,819$ 4,873,409$ 223 EAST MAIN COMMERCIAL LLC Commercial Building 3.22 3.24 3.23 3.30 3.00 0.00 4.54 4.42 4.40 4.35 4.31 4.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.72 4.64 4.28 4.03 3.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00169 425 E MAIN ST 0.35 203,053$ 1,860,447$ 2,063,500$ GSC FAMILY LLC Commercial Building 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.51 0.44 0.24 0.16 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
170 451 E MAIN ST 0.17 2,599,507$ 1,166,793$ 3,766,300$ REAL ANGELS LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00171 235 E MAIN ST 0.09 893,649$ 1,844,551$ 2,738,200$ DECOSSE EASTGATE LLC Commercial Building 0.72 0.79 0.77 0.62 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.94 0.92 0.87 0.83 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.79 0.44 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
173 37 N CHURCH ST 0.18 453,770$ 1,198,006$ 1,651,776$ PENLAND RENTALS LLC Residential Building 0.45 0.25 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.81 0.77 0.70 0.60 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.55 0.42 0.30 0.20 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Alternative ThreeBuilding Inundation Depth (ft)
ID Address Total Acres
Value
Owner Name
Alternative Four
Building Type
Alternative One Alternative TwoExisting Conditions No Action Conditions
Building Land Total 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year
Alternative ThreeBuilding Inundation Depth (ft)
ID Address Total Acres
Value
Owner Name
Alternative Four
Building Type
Alternative One Alternative TwoExisting Conditions No Action Conditions
174 34 N ROUSE AVE 0.46 881,620$ 2,222,091$ 3,103,711$ FIREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.10 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.08 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
175 714 E MENDENHALL ST 0.51 308,340$ 1,831,773$ 2,140,113$ BG MILL LLC Commercial Building 0.45 0.28 0.24 0.19 0.03 0.00 0.98 0.96 0.97 0.99 0.90 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.86 0.82 0.78 0.73 0.44 0.78 0.56 0.47 0.38 0.00 0.00176 428 E MENDENHALL ST 0.17 454,200$ 1,166,793$ 1,620,993$ SEITZ FRANK C JR Commercial Building 0.86 0.59 0.46 0.26 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.09 1.02 0.96 0.75 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.58 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
177 548 E MENDENHALL ST 0.40 407,450$ 2,007,918$ 2,415,368$ BROOKS KENT & KENT LLC Commercial Building 0.38 0.27 0.23 0.22 0.11 0.00 0.47 0.42 0.41 0.36 0.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.30 0.24 0.19 0.14 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00178 326 E MENDENHALL ST 0.08 502,015$ 1,109,985$ 1,612,000$ PETERSEN LEGACY LLC Commercial Building 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.20 0.17 0.12 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
179 422 E MENDENHALL ST 0.17 374,230$ 1,166,793$ 1,541,023$ GALLATIN LABOR TEMPLE Commercial Building 0.33 0.16 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.27 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.23 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00180 26 E MENDENHALL ST 1.10 14,630$ 5,196,730$ 5,211,360$ INTERMODAL COMMERCE CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.51 0.44 0.42 0.33 0.26 0.00 0.55 0.44 0.40 0.29 0.23 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
184 E MENDENHALL ST 0.58 863,118$ 647,482$ 1,510,600$ WESTLAND ENTERPRISES INC Commercial Building 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.26 0.22 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00185 102 N CHURCH ST 0.08 807,410$ 685,196$ 1,492,606$ RAD HOLDINGS LLC Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
188 615 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 782,320$ 309,084$ 1,091,404$ ARTLAW LLC Commercial Building 0.27 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.37 0.34 0.29 0.24 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.19 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00189 533 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 215,210$ 1,259,281$ 1,474,491$ ZIRKULU LLC Residential Building 0.79 0.71 0.68 0.59 0.26 0.00 0.97 0.91 0.89 0.85 0.82 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.79 0.75 0.68 0.58 0.00 0.70 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
190 511 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 56,719$ 1,259,281$ 1,316,000$ SOCOLO PARTNERS LLC Residential Building 0.62 0.45 0.41 0.39 0.00 0.00 1.52 1.05 0.97 0.81 0.70 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.25 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00192 549 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 422,165$ 459,735$ 881,900$ ROCKSTONE PROPERTIES LLC Residential Building 0.78 0.63 0.57 0.45 0.13 0.00 0.96 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.74 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.68 0.62 0.48 0.37 0.00 0.52 0.23 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
193 514 E DAVIS ST 0.13 143,742$ 390,458$ 534,200$ HOSKING JOHN M Residential Building 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.13 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00194 102 N BROADWAY AVE 0.31 1,435,162$ 419,438$ 1,854,600$ PAPILLON LLC Commercial Building 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
196 109 N BROADWAY AVE 0.15 180,867$ 491,133$ 672,000$ DEVITT PHILIP & NELLE Misc Building 0.97 0.81 0.76 0.70 0.50 0.34 1.15 1.05 1.01 0.93 0.87 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.82 0.76 0.67 0.57 0.33 0.67 0.47 0.41 0.30 0.00 0.00197 E MENDENHALL ST 0.39 -$ 541,119$ 541,119$ NEBO CONDO MASTER Residential Building 0.35 0.20 0.17 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
199 625 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 225,294$ 559,006$ 784,300$ GERBER DIANE LORETTA TRUSTEE & Residential Building 0.65 0.62 0.42 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.67 0.66 0.65 0.64 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.52 0.48 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00203 629 E MENDENHALL ST 0.22 136,125$ 556,575$ 692,700$ WEIX MICHAEL Misc Building 0.62 0.55 0.52 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.68 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.54 0.49 0.43 0.37 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
205 111 N BROADWAY AVE 0.16 270,356$ 514,844$ 785,200$ DRYSDALE ESTATES LLC Residential Building 0.65 0.52 0.47 0.42 0.28 0.18 0.71 0.66 0.65 0.62 0.59 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.54 0.51 0.45 0.40 0.24 0.47 0.36 0.31 0.23 0.00 0.00
206 109 N ROUSE AVE 0.20 6,800$ 1,207,602$ 1,214,402$ GMG CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.76 0.48 0.41 0.36 0.08 0.00 0.68 0.57 0.55 0.51 0.46 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
207 619 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 390,425$ 556,575$ 947,000$ BAKER JOHN BRUNT & Residential Building 0.67 0.65 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.66 0.62 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
209 541 E MENDENHALL ST 0.19 991,630$ 459,735$ 1,451,365$ DAVIS CHRIS Residential Building 0.14 0.07 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00210 317 E MENDENHALL ST 0.30 929,507$ 1,027,293$ 1,956,800$ SWN CREEKSIDE LLC Commercial Building 2.90 2.77 2.73 2.60 2.56 2.32 0.92 0.54 0.47 0.36 0.26 0.11 1.14 1.13 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.41 1.93 1.75 1.13 0.00 0.00 2.68 2.44 2.38 2.25 2.09 1.78 2.86 2.60 2.51 2.31 2.04 1.51
211 115 N BROADWAY AVE 0.17 469,021$ 533,279$ 1,002,300$ DRYSDALE ESTATES LLC Residential Building 0.27 0.18 0.15 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.50 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.36 0.33 0.24 0.15 0.05 0.20 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00212 702 E LAMME ST 0.22 153,351$ 557,349$ 710,700$ TOWNSEND SHARON R Residential Building 0.39 0.33 0.32 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.70 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.56 0.51 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
213 626 E LAMME ST 0.17 129,054$ 520,646$ 649,700$ BARLOW M ETHAN Residential Building 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.48 0.47 0.44 0.41 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.39 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00214 704 E LAMME ST 0.18 54,385$ 546,415$ 600,800$ GLENN CHRISTOPHER M & SUSAN L Residential Building 0.65 0.61 0.59 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.45 1.37 1.34 1.29 1.25 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.23 1.18 0.82 0.36 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
215 512 E LAMME ST 0.10 149,641$ 340,559$ 490,200$ GROSSENBACHER JENNIFER Residential Building 0.93 0.73 0.68 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.87 0.84 0.78 0.72 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.64 0.56 0.42 0.21 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00216 514 E LAMME ST 0.10 94,146$ 340,559$ 434,705$ POELMAN DAVID & JENNIFER Residential Building 0.66 0.50 0.45 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.88 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.83 0.74 0.55 0.35 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
217 421 E PEACH ST 0.17 168,297$ 517,503$ 685,800$ HELP CENTER INC Residential Building 0.46 0.23 0.15 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.28 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00218 516 E LAMME ST 0.19 420,865$ 459,735$ 880,600$ GALLAHER KATHLEEN SUSAN REV LIV TR Residential Building 0.62 0.48 0.43 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.88 0.85 0.83 0.78 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.68 0.60 0.46 0.32 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
219 520 E LAMME ST 0.19 229,465$ 459,735$ 689,200$ CONOVER THEODORE C & Residential Building 0.76 0.61 0.57 0.46 0.24 0.00 0.97 0.85 0.81 0.75 0.70 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.63 0.57 0.48 0.41 0.00 0.55 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00223 125 N WALLACE AVE 0.39 414,266$ 492,834$ 907,100$ EAGLE TIRE INC Commercial Building 0.21 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.27 0.23 0.17 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.12 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
224 124 N WALLACE AVE 0.58 937,318$ 647,482$ 1,584,800$ SIMKINS-HALLIN INC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.09 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00226 706 E LAMME ST 0.13 99,227$ 473,273$ 572,500$ SAGMYR ELLEN K & Residential Building 0.44 0.39 0.36 0.32 0.08 0.00 1.86 1.78 1.76 1.72 1.68 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.64 1.57 1.05 0.39 0.00 1.08 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
227 622 E LAMME ST 0.22 29,704$ 589,696$ 619,400$ WARREN STEVEN E Residential Building 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.69 0.67 0.63 0.59 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.52 0.46 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00229 630 E LAMME ST 0.22 161,625$ 556,575$ 718,200$ SIX30AM LLC Residential Building 0.70 0.56 0.49 0.38 0.00 0.00 1.39 1.32 1.30 1.25 1.19 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 1.13 1.11 0.83 0.32 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
230 122 N CHURCH AVE 0.19 606,365$ 459,735$ 1,066,100$ SMITH MARJORIE E Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00234 114 N ROUSE AVE 2.62 -$ 7,131,076$ 7,131,076$ SCHOOL DISTRICT 7 Educational Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.66 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
235 706 E PEACH ST 0.17 739,797$ 517,503$ 1,257,300$ HOITSMA TODD R & AMY KELLEY Residential Building 0.32 0.28 0.26 0.21 0.09 0.00 0.57 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.30 0.28 0.20 0.16 0.00 0.23 0.14 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00236 220 E LAMME ST 1.22 -$ 2,126,798$ 2,126,798$ CITY OF BOZEMAN Commercial Building 0.93 0.88 0.86 0.83 0.79 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.58 0.49 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.13 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00
237 201 N BROADWAY AVE 0.13 188,376$ 462,324$ 650,700$ MOODY KIMBERLY Residential Building 0.91 0.83 0.80 0.77 0.46 0.00 1.16 1.09 1.06 1.01 0.96 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.92 0.86 0.81 0.75 0.00 0.82 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00238 205 N CHURCH ST 0.25 651,630$ 363,996$ 1,015,626$ NORTH CHURCH LLC Residential Building 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
239 711 E LAMME ST 0.05 205,230$ 251,760$ 456,990$ VAIL JULIETTE M Residential Building 0.66 0.59 0.57 0.55 0.30 0.00 0.86 0.80 0.78 0.74 0.70 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.66 0.62 0.57 0.54 0.00 0.58 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
241 401 E LAMME ST 0.14 423,591$ 395,809$ 819,400$ RESSE MARY LEE S TRUSTEE Residential Building 0.27 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
243 519 E LAMME ST 0.18 263,650$ 533,461$ 797,111$ SCATES JULIE A Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.19 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
246 204 N WALLACE AVE 0.15 322,667$ 481,133$ 803,800$ GAFFNEY PROPERTIES LLC Residential Building 0.96 0.80 0.73 0.67 0.51 0.00 1.20 1.10 1.07 1.01 0.96 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.91 0.86 0.79 0.73 0.00 0.81 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00247 625 E LAMME ST 0.47 762,380$ 829,827$ 1,592,207$ NICHOLSON JEFFREY JOHN & Residential Building 0.95 0.84 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.74 0.71 0.61 0.55 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.39 0.36 0.29 0.02 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
248 629 E LAMME ST 0.21 111,953$ 576,747$ 688,700$ ULMAN STEPHEN R & LINDA C Residential Building 0.54 0.45 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.41 0.36 0.21 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00249 203 N WALLACE AVE 0.16 232,656$ 514,144$ 746,800$ SUCICH CHRISTOPHER J Residential Building 0.55 0.36 0.28 0.17 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.95 0.92 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.77 0.71 0.61 0.49 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
250 208 N WALLACE AVE 0.17 124,230$ 239,386$ 363,616$ LOCKIE DAVID DEAN & JENNIE LEE TRUSTEES Misc Building 0.84 0.74 0.59 0.52 0.18 0.00 1.02 0.95 0.93 0.89 0.84 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.78 0.73 0.66 0.49 0.00 0.71 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00251 19 E LAMME ST 0.04 1,288,782$ 240,918$ 1,529,700$ DOKKEN WADE & SUSI Residential Building 2.49 2.40 2.38 2.24 2.21 0.16 2.71 2.49 2.45 2.37 2.26 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 1.38 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
253 205 N WALLACE AVE 0.14 119,068$ 486,132$ 605,200$ MCGEE MICHAEL P JR & Residential Building 0.61 0.43 0.36 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.02 0.94 0.91 0.85 0.81 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.78 0.72 0.63 0.52 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00255 206 N MONTANA AVE 0.29 335,554$ 547,946$ 883,500$ MITCHELL NICHOLAS Residential Building 1.10 1.02 1.00 0.95 0.93 0.86 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.84 0.79 0.58 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.03 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.67 1.52 1.28 1.21 1.06 0.86 0.50
259 310 E BEALL ST 0.17 208,249$ 249,751$ 458,000$ RPM MONTANA LLC & Residential Building 0.69 0.58 0.55 0.52 0.51 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.52 0.49 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.73 0.69 0.62 0.52 0.38 1.59 1.34 1.27 1.10 0.89 0.47260 210 N CHURCH AVE 0.22 446,453$ 502,247$ 948,700$ GEORGETON BRUNO & KRISTINE K Residential Building 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
261 20 E BEALL ST 0.05 1,253,993$ 240,807$ 1,494,800$ GEORGE PHILLIP H & BONITA K Residential Building 2.48 2.40 2.37 2.24 2.21 0.19 2.56 2.44 2.41 2.34 2.25 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.18 1.37 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00262 212 N BROADWAY AVE 0.15 1,215,050$ 221,346$ 1,436,396$ MORICE JULIEN Misc Building 0.23 0.14 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.58 0.56 0.50 0.45 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.37 0.33 0.17 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
264 212 N CHURCH AVE 0.24 949,420$ 502,774$ 1,452,194$ MCCUNE MATTHEW M & Residential Building 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.46 0.43 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00266 214 N PLUM AVE 0.25 308,257$ 615,543$ 923,800$ URICH VIRGINIA Residential Building 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.34 0.31 0.27 0.21 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.18 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
267 211 N WALLACE AVE 0.24 353,520$ 608,042$ 961,562$ BENNETT WILLIAM H Residential Building 0.16 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00268 210 N WALLACE AVE 0.12 73,461$ 463,639$ 537,100$ THOMPSON DIANE M Misc Building 0.57 0.48 0.46 0.41 0.23 0.00 0.85 0.76 0.74 0.69 0.63 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.55 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.00 0.50 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
270 216 N PLUM AVE 0.33 225,200$ 698,600$ 923,800$ PLUM STREET LLC Residential Building 0.90 0.77 0.72 0.67 0.51 0.39 1.29 1.23 1.21 1.16 1.11 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.03 0.94 0.81 0.75 0.49 0.84 0.69 0.60 0.45 0.00 0.00271 221 N BROADWAY AVE 0.16 124,397$ 517,503$ 641,900$ MCADAMS DAVID BROCK JR & Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
274 216 N WALLACE AVE 0.25 426,793$ 631,607$ 1,058,400$ TRIPP PHOEBE JOSEPHINE TRUST Residential Building 0.48 0.38 0.34 0.28 0.17 0.00 0.77 0.70 0.68 0.64 0.59 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.54 0.49 0.40 0.35 0.00 0.43 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00275 216 N CHURCH AVE 0.25 679,760$ 502,247$ 1,182,007$ ADAMS TANNIS HART Residential Building 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
276 215 N WALLACE AVE 0.24 180,658$ 608,042$ 788,700$ PORITZ NOAH H & LEONA T Residential Building 0.31 0.26 0.21 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.23 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00278 303 E BEALL ST 0.19 428,580$ 454,964$ 883,544$ MARTIN LUCANUS E Residential Building 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.32 0.30 0.22 0.00 0.00
279 309 E BEALL ST 0.15 116,399$ 403,101$ 519,500$ NEW DIRECTION TRUST COMPANY Residential Building 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.25 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00
283 612 E DAVIS ST 0.15 625,870$ 495,801$ 1,121,671$ WHITLOCK BRIAN Misc Building 0.29 0.18 0.14 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.30 0.27 0.21 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
285 618 E DAVIS ST 0.14 281,656$ 479,044$ 760,700$ MOZEN PAULA Residential Building 0.48 0.34 0.29 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.78 0.75 0.68 0.62 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.53 0.45 0.35 0.25 0.00 0.42 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
286 301 N BLACK AVE 0.08 668,892$ 319,808$ 988,700$ MILLER GREGORY L & KATIE C H Residential Building 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.12 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00287 225 N BROADWAY AVE 0.20 470,073$ 571,957$ 1,042,030$ BROWN HAMPTON HARRIS & CHRISTINA LANDRY Residential Building 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
288 620 E DAVIS ST 0.16 485,193$ 512,102$ 997,295$ SCATES JULIE A Residential Building 0.81 0.69 0.65 0.59 0.33 0.00 1.26 1.15 1.12 1.06 1.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.95 0.88 0.78 0.68 0.00 0.80 0.55 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00289 226 N PLUM AVE 0.16 220,197$ 517,503$ 737,700$ SPROUT RICHARD L & SHAUNA L TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.48 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.11 0.00 2.25 2.19 2.17 2.11 2.06 1.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 1.94 1.81 1.50 1.19 0.38 1.56 0.86 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
290 630 E DAVIS ST 0.13 724,830$ 476,170$ 1,201,000$ BURT HILARY E Residential Building 0.84 0.72 0.69 0.62 0.44 0.00 1.03 0.96 0.93 0.89 0.86 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.83 0.78 0.74 0.71 0.00 0.75 0.64 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00291 626 E DAVIS ST 0.12 625,442$ 446,958$ 1,072,400$ SWANSON RAND C Residential Building 0.84 0.72 0.69 0.63 0.43 0.00 1.11 1.02 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.84 0.80 0.77 0.73 0.00 0.85 0.67 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
292 222 S BLACK AVE 0.22 703,290$ 474,470$ 1,177,760$ HOOKER ROBERT PERRY Residential Building 0.25 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.24 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00293 810 E DAVIS ST 0.11 335,728$ 439,772$ 775,500$ ENGLER MARCUS L Residential Building 0.56 0.46 0.44 0.42 0.33 0.08 1.81 1.77 1.75 1.72 1.69 1.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74 1.66 1.59 1.41 1.23 0.44 1.42 0.94 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00
294 230 N PLUM AVE 0.14 365,263$ 473,237$ 838,500$ NORTON WM E & CATHIE L Residential Building 0.77 0.67 0.64 0.62 0.51 0.28 1.22 1.19 1.18 1.16 1.14 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.12 1.08 0.99 0.89 0.46 0.99 0.74 0.59 0.22 0.00 0.00298 302 N WALLACE AVE 0.26 295,756$ 638,844$ 934,600$ MARTY STEVEN MARK Residential Building 0.58 0.49 0.47 0.42 0.32 0.00 0.74 0.69 0.67 0.64 0.62 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.58 0.56 0.52 0.45 0.00 0.55 0.41 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
299 318 N ROUSE AVE 0.17 155,410$ 432,633$ 588,043$ JESPERSON MATTHEW THOMAS Residential Building 0.30 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.18 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.40 0.30 0.18 0.00 0.00300 617 E DAVIS ST 0.14 174,297$ 491,403$ 665,700$ YOUNG KEVIN RONALD & Residential Building 0.46 0.37 0.34 0.28 0.17 0.00 0.90 0.76 0.72 0.63 0.59 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.56 0.52 0.46 0.38 0.00 0.47 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
301 303 N BROADWAY AVE 0.16 287,397$ 517,503$ 804,900$ DILG-CUNNINGHAM TUCKER & Residential Building 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.41 0.40 0.36 0.32 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.27 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00304 508 E LAMME ST 0.19 249,665$ 459,735$ 709,400$ HERNANDEZ JESUS & LAURA Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.31 0.29 0.21 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
306 621 E DAVIS ST 0.14 163,066$ 496,434$ 659,500$ ST JOHN MYLES & Residential Building 1.43 1.08 1.01 0.90 0.60 0.00 0.71 0.58 0.54 0.34 0.25 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00307 625 E DAVIS ST 0.33 350,220$ 705,898$ 1,056,118$ EDGMOND BARBARA H Residential Building 1.57 1.32 1.23 1.08 0.81 0.00 0.87 0.76 0.73 0.49 0.32 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.32 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
309 809 E DAVIS ST 0.12 38,729$ 450,571$ 489,300$ SCHWALM CARLYNN J & Residential Building 0.15 0.10 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.35 0.33 0.29 0.24 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.17 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00310 310 N WALLACE AVE 0.18 171,872$ 529,928$ 701,800$ PATTERSON ROBIN J TRUSTEE Residential Building 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.17 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
311 615 E DAVIS ST 0.29 168,467$ 669,033$ 837,500$ BUCKNER STEVEN L & LINDA N TRUSTEES Misc Building 0.36 0.22 0.30 0.18 0.17 0.00 0.58 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.32 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.21 0.25 0.16 0.15 0.00 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00312 803 E DAVIS ST 0.17 324,340$ 523,764$ 848,104$ GOODRICH AUTUMN Residential Building 0.44 0.42 0.38 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
314 631 E DAVIS ST 0.22 367,106$ 485,294$ 852,400$ CRATER RIDGE LLC Residential Building 0.70 0.61 0.58 0.54 0.42 0.30 0.95 0.83 0.79 0.74 0.70 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.67 0.64 0.60 0.53 0.31 0.61 0.45 0.35 0.28 0.00 0.00315 311 N PLUM AVE 0.10 267,898$ 283,602$ 551,500$ PRENDERGAST SHANNON FRANCIS Residential Building 0.74 0.67 0.64 0.60 0.47 0.35 0.85 0.79 0.77 0.74 0.70 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.65 0.62 0.58 0.54 0.34 0.61 0.49 0.40 0.33 0.00 0.00
316 317 N IDA AVE 0.13 511,140$ 461,409$ 972,549$ KENNER EMILY S TRUSTEE & Misc Building 0.33 0.21 0.17 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.52 0.46 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.31 0.26 0.20 0.09 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
319 310 N PLUM AVE 0.21 39,270$ 573,366$ 612,636$ PEACE MALISSA GEANE TRUSTEE & Residential Building 0.63 0.49 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 1.07 1.04 0.96 0.90 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
322 327 N ROUSE AVE 0.03 112,292$ 342,308$ 454,600$ RITCHEY KATHLEEN MARIE & Residential Building 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.87 2.27 2.05 1.65 1.20 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.21 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
323 402 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.22 193,099$ 479,101$ 672,200$ ALEXANDER BEN S & SARAH G Residential Building 0.47 0.46 0.45 0.42 0.37 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.40 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00324 318 N WALLACE AVE 0.35 581,360$ 715,374$ 1,296,734$ STROLIN STUART & AMANDA Residential Building 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.21 0.16 0.12 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
325 323 N PLUM AVE 0.32 1,019,390$ 683,478$ 1,702,868$ SKIDMORE PETER B Misc Building 0.55 0.47 0.44 0.39 0.20 0.12 0.93 0.86 0.84 0.79 0.75 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.69 0.66 0.63 0.59 0.22 0.67 0.55 0.37 0.18 0.00 0.00326 317 N WALLACE AVE 0.13 767,860$ 464,076$ 1,231,936$ JOHNSON JARED L & KATHERINE P S Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
327 628 E FRIDLEY ST 0.24 261,697$ 611,503$ 873,200$ SENN VIRGINIA KNETZGER & CHARLES STRAWBRIDGE Residential Building 0.82 0.70 0.66 0.60 0.41 0.22 1.17 1.07 1.04 0.97 0.93 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.84 0.79 0.74 0.67 0.18 0.80 0.63 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00328 316 N CHURCH AVE 0.21 347,798$ 478,202$ 826,000$ GARCIA GEORGE JACOB Residential Building 0.31 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
330 405 N MONTANA AVE 0.30 321,485$ 546,815$ 868,300$ PASQUESI TAMI & DOMINIC TRUSTEES & Misc Building 0.45 0.41 0.39 0.34 0.33 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.38 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00331 319 N CHURCH AVE 0.15 598,497$ 405,903$ 1,004,400$ ELLIS PAUL Residential Building 0.23 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.34 0.24 0.19 0.17 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
332 316 N PLUM AVE 0.25 129,502$ 616,798$ 746,300$ DIGENNARO LYNN ANN Misc Building 0.27 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.50 0.48 0.44 0.39 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.22 0.17 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00334 632 E FRIDLEY ST 0.24 129,516$ 602,284$ 731,800$ BUSSE SCOTT C Residential Building 0.36 0.19 0.16 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.86 0.81 0.73 0.66 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.61 0.54 0.44 0.27 0.00 0.46 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
335 408 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.30 470,809$ 546,815$ 1,017,624$ SANTOS VANESSA & Misc Building 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.09 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00336 320 N PLUM AVE 0.16 297,297$ 517,503$ 814,800$ BEAN ANYA Residential Building 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.92 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.82 0.57 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
338 324 N WALLACE AVE 0.17 250,772$ 529,928$ 780,700$ QUINN KELLY MARIE & Residential Building 0.17 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.33 0.30 0.22 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00339 710 E FRIDLEY ST 0.27 343,860$ 605,840$ 949,700$ LOUSTAUNAU P KEVIN REVOCABLE TRUST DTD 10/9/08 Residential Building 0.50 0.39 0.37 0.31 0.13 0.00 0.79 0.68 0.65 0.59 0.54 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.51 0.46 0.41 0.32 0.00 0.41 0.23 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
342 323 N CHURCH AVE 0.15 473,925$ 477,075$ 951,000$ BERG JAMES E Residential Building 0.38 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.65 0.63 0.44 0.37 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00343 414 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.26 472,110$ 521,391$ 993,501$ GEBHARDT RENEE Residential Building 0.36 0.30 0.28 0.20 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.70 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00
345 524 E FRIDLEY ST 0.11 79,944$ 428,856$ 508,800$ LUNDY JANICE Residential Building 0.63 0.52 0.39 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.79 0.75 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.59 0.58 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00346 325 N BROADWAY AVE 0.20 318,343$ 571,957$ 890,300$ SEBREN MATTHEW L & MICHELLE HANNIGAN Misc Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.14 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
347 512 FRIDLEY ST 0.21 891,419$ 472,281$ 1,363,700$ ELIAS BENJAMIN T Residential Building 0.27 0.13 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00349 330 N WALLACE AVE 0.17 248,142$ 512,358$ 760,500$ BRODIE CHARLES KENT Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
350 520 E FRIDLEY ST 0.11 165,620$ 428,856$ 594,476$ THOMAS VICTORIA S Residential Building 0.26 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.30 0.27 0.16 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00351 327 N CHURCH AVE 0.15 264,783$ 408,817$ 673,600$ BOZEMAN CHURCH STREET LLC Residential Building 1.54 1.44 1.42 1.40 0.00 0.00 1.65 1.58 1.55 1.49 1.45 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.43 1.41 1.35 0.58 0.00 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
352 418 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.13 538,150$ 384,050$ 922,200$ LOVE ANDREW S Residential Building 0.30 0.25 0.23 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.57 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
Building Land Total 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year
Alternative ThreeBuilding Inundation Depth (ft)
ID Address Total Acres
Value
Owner Name
Alternative Four
Building Type
Alternative One Alternative TwoExisting Conditions No Action Conditions
353 326 N PLUM AVE 0.41 471,949$ 769,451$ 1,241,400$ THOMPSON DALLAS & NORMA Residential Building 1.12 0.77 0.25 0.18 0.00 0.00 1.46 1.46 1.46 1.44 1.41 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 1.41 1.29 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
356 415 N MONTANA AVE 0.14 576,370$ 396,443$ 972,813$ BELL TIMOTHY J Residential Building 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.25 0.23 0.07 0.00 0.00357 329 N BROADWAY AVE 0.20 279,550$ 570,904$ 850,454$ RAINEY KRISTEN M Residential Building 0.91 0.81 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 1.19 1.15 1.13 1.10 0.97 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.61 0.50 0.48 0.58 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
358 421 N MONTANA AVE 0.21 143,226$ 463,974$ 607,200$ WINGERTER ROBERT Residential Building 0.29 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.15 0.19 0.10 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.04 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.31 0.25 0.12 0.00 0.00359 401 N IDA AVE 0.08 222,790$ 377,210$ 600,000$ MOODY MICHAEL P & BARBARA JOAN Residential Building 0.57 0.49 0.45 0.34 0.18 0.00 1.15 1.06 1.03 0.97 0.92 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.87 0.82 0.71 0.50 0.00 0.75 0.37 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00
360 401 N CHURCH AVE 0.25 422,793$ 515,807$ 938,600$ SILOHOUSE LLC Residential Building 0.75 0.66 0.64 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.80 0.77 0.71 0.67 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.70 0.68 0.62 0.02 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00361 703 E FRIDLEY ST 0.13 691,350$ 462,653$ 1,154,003$ PELLING KARRIE LARK Residential Building 0.91 0.76 0.72 0.64 0.31 0.00 1.63 1.53 1.49 1.43 1.38 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.56 1.43 1.38 1.31 1.22 0.00 1.25 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
362 421 N ROUSE AVE 0.20 340,724$ 465,376$ 806,100$ MILLER DAVID L Residential Building 0.70 0.46 0.40 0.31 0.24 0.14 0.33 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.28 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00363 401 N WALLACE AVE 0.17 383,572$ 529,928$ 913,500$ SHEPPARD AMY & Residential Building 0.30 0.17 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.34 0.32 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.20 0.16 0.10 0.04 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
364 424 N ROUSE AVE 0.26 466,711$ 380,089$ 846,800$ FOLEY JAMES D & UNDIV 50% INT Residential Building 1.32 1.02 0.94 0.86 0.60 0.38 0.73 0.36 0.34 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.22 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.26 0.13 0.94 0.57 0.42 0.32 0.54 0.30365 403 N BROADWAY AVE 0.12 556,443$ 464,257$ 1,020,700$ WRIGHT SHERYL LYNNE Residential Building 0.34 0.29 0.25 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.33 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.28 0.25 0.21 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
368 404 N WALLACE AVE 0.13 120,819$ 459,681$ 580,500$ ARMOLD DARREN DAVID & WILLIAM JOSEPH & Residential Building 0.68 0.56 0.52 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.88 0.86 0.82 0.78 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.76 0.71 0.63 0.52 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00369 709 E FRIDLEY ST 0.11 476,136$ 418,064$ 894,200$ BRYAN GROUP LLC Residential Building 0.86 0.75 0.72 0.67 0.43 0.19 1.08 1.01 0.99 0.95 0.91 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.92 0.89 0.85 0.80 0.22 0.83 0.66 0.34 0.18 0.00 0.00
370 425 N MONTANA AVE 0.26 695,033$ 513,067$ 1,208,100$ 2 NORTH MONTANA LLC Residential Building 0.25 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00371 405 N IDA AVE 0.08 239,490$ 377,210$ 616,700$ VISSER MINDY S Residential Building 0.56 0.48 0.44 0.37 0.25 0.00 1.64 1.53 1.50 1.43 1.38 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 1.34 1.29 1.18 0.97 0.00 1.21 0.84 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
375 519 E FRIDLEY ST 0.14 98,497$ 491,403$ 589,900$ TAYLOR REBECCA L & ERIN S Misc Building 0.61 0.52 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.62 0.61 0.58 0.52 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.35 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00377 411 N WALLACE AVE 0.32 391,088$ 690,012$ 1,081,100$ SCHLEGEL DELBERT D & BULAH Residential Building 0.72 0.60 0.53 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.80 0.77 0.73 0.69 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.63 0.48 0.21 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
378 407 N IDA AVE 0.08 160,390$ 377,210$ 537,600$ DAELLENBACH ELBERTA & BRENDA REV TR DTD 1/2/13 Residential Building 0.25 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.07 0.00 1.77 1.66 1.62 1.55 1.50 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.62 1.45 1.39 1.26 0.87 0.00 1.30 0.72 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00379 E FRIDLEY ST 0.10 14,030$ 407,887$ 421,917$ BRYAN GROUP LLC Residential Building 0.83 0.66 0.61 0.54 0.32 0.09 1.13 1.01 0.97 0.90 0.84 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.81 0.75 0.68 0.60 0.12 0.69 0.46 0.22 0.06 0.00 0.00
380 408 N WALLACE AVE 0.11 354,446$ 434,854$ 789,300$ LEWIS MATTHEW C & CHERYL L Residential Building 0.62 0.55 0.53 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.82 0.79 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.77 0.73 0.66 0.55 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
381 409 N BRADY AVE 0.10 227,346$ 417,354$ 644,700$ CENTER DANIEL Residential Building 0.30 0.23 0.20 0.15 0.00 0.00 1.10 1.07 1.06 1.03 1.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.98 0.95 0.88 0.78 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
382 410 N IDA AVE 0.12 749,270$ 459,644$ 1,208,914$ ESPAIN KARRIE LARK PELLING Misc Building 0.85 0.60 0.55 0.42 0.01 0.00 1.56 1.42 1.38 1.28 1.16 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.37 1.06 0.96 0.91 0.82 0.00 0.93 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
383 428 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.26 298,433$ 513,067$ 811,500$ LOT 5 LLC Residential Building 0.07 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00384 412 N WALLACE AVE 0.11 305,246$ 434,854$ 740,100$ CROSS WYATT F & Residential Building 0.45 0.39 0.36 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.69 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.56 0.52 0.45 0.34 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
386 411 N IDA AVE 0.08 273,090$ 377,210$ 650,300$ BOYD BRENDA K Residential Building 0.24 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.15 1.07 1.05 1.00 0.96 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.94 0.89 0.79 0.47 0.00 0.79 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00388 504 N BLACK AVE 0.13 325,283$ 389,517$ 714,800$ SABO MARK Residential Building 1.43 1.31 1.27 1.00 0.96 0.32 1.71 1.56 1.51 1.42 1.26 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.92 0.85 0.71 0.57 0.00 0.95 0.64 0.63 0.60 0.53 0.00
390 809 E FRIDLEY ST 0.22 25,427$ 583,673$ 609,100$ SPOTTS EDWARD Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.40 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.10 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00391 509 N MONTANA AVE 0.19 181,882$ 441,918$ 623,800$ MURPHY ELLYN Residential Building 0.88 0.78 0.74 0.66 0.64 0.54 0.33 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.54 0.45 0.17 0.00 0.00
393 408 N PLUM AVE 0.19 1,208,343$ 555,857$ 1,764,200$ VAN DEWALLE KENNETH J & KRISTIN E Residential Building 0.72 0.55 0.50 0.42 0.18 0.12 1.15 1.08 1.05 1.01 0.96 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.91 0.85 0.77 0.60 0.01 0.78 0.14 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00394 416 N WALLACE AVE 0.09 339,887$ 394,813$ 734,700$ BRUMBACH KEVIN Residential Building 0.15 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
395 411 N BROADWAY AVE 0.16 125,797$ 517,503$ 643,300$ DRUKMAN SUSIE M Residential Building 0.71 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.61 0.30 0.86 0.83 0.82 0.79 0.76 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.71 0.60 0.71 0.66 0.63 0.16 0.00 0.00396 109 E SHORT ST 0.12 1,069,691$ 368,305$ 1,437,996$ DEARTH DAVID W & Residential Building 1.58 1.47 1.44 1.24 1.19 0.75 1.71 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.21 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.66 0.59 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.28 0.23 0.11 0.00 0.00
398 413 N WALLACE AVE 0.21 486,169$ 578,931$ 1,065,100$ OLIVER PERSIFOR SMITH III & ANNA SUZANNE Residential Building 0.40 0.17 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.74 0.69 0.58 0.47 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.39 0.29 0.20 0.11 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00399 413 N BRADY AVE 0.12 345,254$ 435,646$ 780,900$ RUSSELL ALEXANDER M Misc Building 0.40 0.32 0.29 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
400 415 N BROADWAY AVE 0.17 127,097$ 517,503$ 644,600$ MCLAREN CHRISTINE A & Residential Building 0.52 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.43 0.23 0.64 0.62 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.54 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.41 0.50 0.46 0.44 0.01 0.00 0.00402 511 N MONTANA AVE 0.23 102,373$ 489,327$ 591,700$ MURPHY ELLYN Residential Building 0.58 0.51 0.49 0.45 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.27 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.46 0.41 0.31 0.00 0.00
403 510 N BLACK AVE 0.26 695,900$ 523,515$ 1,219,415$ HUNTER WILLIAM HAWKINS Residential Building 1.87 1.75 1.72 1.52 1.48 1.04 1.98 1.82 1.77 1.67 1.48 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.10 1.04 0.93 0.19 0.00 1.15 0.56 0.51 0.40 0.12 0.00404 419 N WALLACE AVE 0.42 270,876$ 778,724$ 1,049,600$ SCOTT COURTNEY LAUREN Residential Building 0.60 0.42 0.34 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.99 0.94 0.83 0.74 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.66 0.57 0.47 0.38 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
405 512 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.16 309,520$ 420,587$ 730,107$ SANTOS VANESSA & Residential Building 0.23 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00406 418 N WALLACE AVE 0.16 715,594$ 509,406$ 1,225,000$ WICKES MICHAEL Residential Building 0.19 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
407 421 N BROADWAY AVE 0.33 119,981$ 505,419$ 625,400$ BRODIE CHARLES KENT Commercial Building 0.40 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.56 0.50 0.48 0.44 0.35 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.32 0.29 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00409 512 N ROUSE AVE 0.22 237,676$ 474,424$ 712,100$ GROUSE LLC Residential Building 0.69 0.41 0.32 0.30 0.03 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.26 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00
410 422 N PLUM AVE 0.88 1,234,916$ 1,137,284$ 2,372,200$ CYPRESS TREE LLC THE Commercial Building 0.75 0.67 0.65 0.64 0.00 0.00 1.49 1.43 1.41 1.36 1.32 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.28 1.24 1.18 1.07 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00411 425 N IDA AVE 0.28 355,342$ 607,358$ 962,700$ M C PIPER 2 LLC Residential Building 0.69 0.63 0.59 0.53 0.44 0.00 0.68 0.65 0.64 0.63 0.62 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.62 0.60 0.53 0.49 0.00 0.52 0.41 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
414 515 N MONTANA AVE 0.16 167,246$ 419,654$ 586,900$ MCINTOSH CHRISTOPHER Misc Building 0.42 0.36 0.35 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.22 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.28 0.25 0.19 0.00 0.00
416 425 N WALLACE AVE 0.28 296,635$ 652,865$ 949,500$ PUTZIER JESSICA Residential Building 0.82 0.55 0.43 0.35 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.96 0.93 0.85 0.77 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.61 0.49 0.37 0.29 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
417 428 N WALLACE AVE 0.31 130,680$ 673,320$ 804,000$ VICIEDO DAVID Residential Building 0.60 0.49 0.45 0.38 0.10 0.00 0.82 0.73 0.71 0.65 0.60 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.56 0.50 0.40 0.32 0.00 0.43 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
420 526 N ROUSE AVE 0.53 454,050$ 716,382$ 1,170,432$ DRYSDALE FAMILY LLC Residential Building 1.86 1.63 1.56 1.64 1.31 1.05 1.45 0.91 0.61 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.54 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.28 1.16 0.84 0.58 0.00 1.94 1.64 1.51 1.15 0.76 0.00421 520 N BLACK AVE 0.19 397,951$ 458,549$ 856,500$ AG REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC Residential Building 0.41 0.33 0.30 0.16 0.14 0.00 0.47 0.36 0.32 0.25 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
422 523 N MONTANA AVE 0.16 125,846$ 419,654$ 545,500$ HUNTSMAN IVERNA LINCOLN Misc Building 0.57 0.50 0.48 0.44 0.43 0.39 0.34 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.41 0.38 0.30 0.00 0.00423 431 N IDA AVE 0.30 290,480$ 673,320$ 963,800$ CRAYTON CHASE E & CYNTHIA L & ROBERT F Residential Building 0.37 0.25 0.21 0.15 0.08 0.00 0.71 0.60 0.56 0.49 0.42 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.37 0.32 0.24 0.19 0.00 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
424 711 E ORANGE ST 0.16 116,397$ 517,503$ 633,900$ DAVIS AARON Residential Building 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.59 0.57 0.54 0.51 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.52 0.51 0.49 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00425 717 E ORANGE ST 0.16 127,704$ 521,396$ 649,100$ CLOW HILLARY W Residential Building 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.20 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.05 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
427 523 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.19 291,769$ 461,531$ 753,300$ HALVORSON STEPHEN E Misc Building 1.00 0.88 0.85 0.67 0.64 0.27 1.12 0.97 0.92 0.82 0.65 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.26 0.22 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00429 504 N WALLACE AVE 0.13 163,611$ 499,289$ 662,900$ BARTON LINDEN MALLORY Misc Building 0.32 0.18 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.44 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.32 0.25 0.15 0.04 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
430 524 N BLACK AVE 0.20 544,382$ 460,918$ 1,005,300$ OXNAM RONALD J Residential Building 0.52 0.44 0.41 0.26 0.24 0.00 0.55 0.47 0.44 0.37 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00431 525 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.10 192,041$ 340,559$ 532,600$ KNICKERBOCKER LEAH & Residential Building 0.93 0.83 0.81 0.64 0.60 0.18 0.97 0.85 0.81 0.72 0.60 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.20 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
432 514 N IDA AVE 0.17 212,973$ 367,427$ 580,400$ PAPE JAY C & ASA G H Residential Building 0.70 0.59 0.53 0.45 0.28 0.00 1.23 1.10 1.06 0.97 0.89 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.84 0.79 0.73 0.63 0.00 0.74 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00434 508 N WALLACE AVE 0.15 147,911$ 499,289$ 647,200$ SCHUH M ELIZABETH Residential Building 0.23 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.14 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
436 527 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.10 411,141$ 340,559$ 751,700$ CENTER STEVEN PETER Residential Building 0.61 0.53 0.51 0.37 0.35 0.00 0.65 0.55 0.52 0.45 0.36 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00439 511 N WALLACE AVE 0.91 823,198$ 882,602$ 1,705,800$ MARTIN LAND LLC Commercial Building 0.41 0.28 0.21 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.68 0.63 0.48 0.42 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.36 0.28 0.18 0.09 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
441 527 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.10 411,141$ 340,559$ 751,700$ CENTER STEVEN PETER Residential Building 0.70 0.62 0.60 0.48 0.46 0.08 0.73 0.64 0.61 0.55 0.46 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00442 507 N IDA AVE 0.71 3,679,313$ 1,103,187$ 4,782,500$ M5 MONTANA LLC Residential Building 0.26 0.24 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.34 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.27 0.24 0.21 0.15 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
443 531 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.19 274,065$ 459,735$ 733,800$ CORE TROY M & KIRSTEN MULL Residential Building 0.71 0.64 0.62 0.50 0.48 0.14 0.77 0.68 0.65 0.59 0.52 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.20 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00445 528 N BLACK AVE 0.20 192,203$ 462,097$ 654,300$ THOMPSON CAROL & RICHARD E & Residential Building 0.97 0.90 0.88 0.77 0.75 0.44 1.16 1.07 1.04 0.97 0.87 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.66 0.60 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
448 509 N CHURCH AVE 0.13 229,720$ 420,080$ 649,800$ QUINN DEIRDRE P Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00449 513 N PLUM AVE 0.13 171,415$ 484,485$ 655,900$ SIENKIEWICZ STANLEY & ELEANOR Misc Building 1.30 1.10 1.03 0.92 0.59 0.28 1.70 1.60 1.56 1.49 1.44 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 1.37 1.29 1.22 1.07 0.61 1.24 0.95 0.79 0.58 0.00 0.00
452 534 N BLACK AVE 0.30 355,061$ 556,739$ 911,800$ YURASHAK CHAD & BLAIRE Residential Building 0.82 0.77 0.75 0.64 0.61 0.30 0.54 0.49 0.48 0.45 0.46 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.32 0.30 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.00 0.00457 534 N ROUSE AVE 0.14 197,725$ 405,875$ 603,600$ PERKINS KATHRYN JEAN TRUST Misc Building 1.75 1.44 1.33 1.48 0.79 0.20 0.91 0.24 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.59 0.50 0.36 0.21 0.00 1.47 1.06 0.93 0.66 0.36 0.03
458 517 N CHURCH AVE 0.22 268,453$ 488,847$ 757,300$ MOMMSEN PETER L Residential Building 1.00 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.92 0.89 0.85 0.83 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.74 0.73 0.69 0.59 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
459 516 N WALLACE AVE 0.23 250,270$ 595,089$ 845,359$ STASH MICHELLE C & MATHEW Residential Building 0.59 0.43 0.37 0.29 0.15 0.00 0.88 0.80 0.77 0.71 0.64 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.55 0.46 0.34 0.24 0.00 0.41 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
462 702 E PEACH ST 0.18 1,805,909$ 517,503$ 2,323,412$ KAPSNER HOPE & MATTHEW Residential Building 0.97 0.89 0.85 0.77 0.57 0.00 1.48 1.38 1.35 1.27 1.21 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 1.16 1.09 0.95 0.84 0.00 0.99 0.74 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00
469 532 - 534 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.26 739,317$ 566,283$ 1,305,600$ WISHBONE IZZY LLC & Residential Building 0.19 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00470 517 N CHURCH AVE 0.22 268,453$ 488,847$ 757,300$ MOMMSEN PETER L Residential Building 0.23 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
471 516 N WALLACE AVE 0.23 250,270$ 595,089$ 845,359$ STASH MICHELLE C & MATHEW Residential Building 0.39 0.29 0.23 0.16 0.02 0.00 1.04 0.98 0.96 0.91 0.87 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.82 0.76 0.66 0.52 0.00 0.69 0.37 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00472 712 E PEACH ST 0.16 493,297$ 517,503$ 1,010,800$ KLEINE JULIE Residential Building 0.85 0.73 0.69 0.60 0.44 0.00 1.17 1.06 1.02 0.95 0.85 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.79 0.70 0.55 0.47 0.00 0.59 0.46 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
473 E PEACH ST 0.40 -$ 620,617$ 620,617$ NORTH PEACH CONDO MASTER Residential Building 0.27 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.45 0.42 0.38 0.34 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.34 0.31 0.25 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00474 716 E PEACH ST 0.19 153,274$ 545,826$ 699,100$ DAYTON CHANDLER RAE Residential Building 0.81 0.69 0.64 0.57 0.36 0.15 1.04 0.94 0.91 0.85 0.80 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.75 0.70 0.63 0.52 0.21 0.66 0.45 0.32 0.18 0.00 0.00
475 535 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.12 128,936$ 365,664$ 494,600$ PONDOLFINO JACKIE & Misc Building 0.57 0.49 0.47 0.31 0.29 0.00 0.71 0.59 0.56 0.48 0.33 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00481 416 E PEACH ST 0.28 491,296$ 423,404$ 914,700$ MCKENZIE WILLIAM DAVID & ROBERT Residential Building 0.86 0.72 0.67 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.04 2.43 2.21 1.82 1.33 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
482 538 N BLACK AVE 0.15 484,215$ 414,485$ 898,700$ CLARKE REAL ESTATE LLC Residential Building 0.88 0.78 0.75 0.57 0.53 0.10 0.82 0.73 0.69 0.62 0.50 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.17 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00483 206 E PEACH ST 0.23 678,140$ 483,784$ 1,161,924$ MACLEAN JANIS & RODERICK Residential Building 0.28 0.22 0.21 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.15 0.11 0.05 0.00 0.00
484 626 E PEACH ST 0.15 176,197$ 491,403$ 667,600$ STERRY SKY Residential Building 0.31 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.72 0.73 0.59 0.46 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.39 0.26 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00485 706 E PEACH ST 0.17 739,797$ 517,503$ 1,257,300$ HOITSMA TODD R & AMY KELLEY Misc Building 0.29 0.23 0.20 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.53 0.49 0.43 0.36 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.32 0.26 0.18 0.14 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
486 541 N MONTANA AVE 0.33 165,871$ 557,329$ 723,200$ DAVIS MICHAEL Q & Residential Building 0.42 0.40 0.39 0.36 0.35 0.25 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.39 0.37 0.27 0.00 0.00488 520 N WALLACE AVE 0.22 112,127$ 562,273$ 674,400$ MORRISON JOHN B & WENDY BIANCHINI Residential Building 0.76 0.60 0.55 0.48 0.38 0.00 1.48 1.38 1.35 1.28 1.23 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 1.17 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.00 0.99 0.65 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00
489 126 E PEACH ST 0.14 198,280$ 397,419$ 595,699$ STERN ELIZABETH ANN Residential Building 0.44 0.38 0.36 0.15 0.13 0.00 0.56 0.47 0.44 0.38 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00490 542 N BLACK AVE 0.15 88,054$ 410,746$ 498,800$ EGGE MARK D Residential Building 1.08 0.99 0.96 0.80 0.76 0.35 1.05 0.95 0.92 0.85 0.74 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.41 0.35 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.20 0.19 0.15 0.00 0.00
492 724 E PEACH ST 0.15 240,733$ 508,567$ 749,300$ RYAN CATHERINE BREINER Residential Building 1.05 0.93 0.87 0.78 0.49 0.19 0.98 0.89 0.86 0.81 0.77 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.76 0.71 0.64 0.55 0.18 0.63 0.42 0.26 0.12 0.00 0.00493 1.13 -$ 1,407,657$ 1,407,657$ WESTLAND ENTERPRISES INC Residential Building 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
494 541 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.13 215,013$ 393,087$ 608,100$ SCHAEFER TYSON E Residential Building 0.36 0.29 0.27 0.21 0.19 0.00 0.42 0.35 0.33 0.29 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00496 524 N WALLACE AVE 0.08 262,832$ 404,768$ 667,600$ MCDONALD MATTHEW G & Residential Building 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.87 0.78 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.60 0.53 0.40 0.27 0.00 0.43 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
502 603 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.12 425,853$ 366,047$ 791,900$ MONTANA LODGING OPTIONS LLC Residential Building 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.67 0.65 0.60 0.54 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.39 0.33 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.22 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00505 600 N WALLACE AVE 0.74 12,698,110$ 760,945$ 13,459,055$ WILD PEACH LLC Commercial Building 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.14 0.12 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
507 606 N MONTANA AVE 0.16 445,060$ 424,845$ 869,905$ WRIGHT KRISTA K Misc Building 1.03 0.94 0.92 0.91 0.89 0.86 1.07 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.38 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.96 0.93 0.82 0.00 0.00 1.28 1.06 1.03 0.95 0.00 0.00
509 705 N MONTANA AVE 0.15 71,287$ 372,613$ 443,900$ HAWKWEST RENTALS LLC Residential Building 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.21 0.00 0.28 0.23 0.22 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.24 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00
510 CEDAR ST 22.84 -$ 2,270,718$ 2,270,718$ MONTANA RAIL LINK INC Residential Building 0.25 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.38 0.37 0.34 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.32 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.29 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.32 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
512 604 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.24 150,989$ 507,611$ 658,600$ WOODS NICHOLAS A Misc Building 1.77 1.70 1.68 1.62 1.60 1.51 1.27 1.15 1.09 1.02 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.97 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.20 1.13 1.03 0.00 0.00514 105 E PEACH ST 0.19 532,008$ 208,292$ 740,300$ GIBSON ROCHELLE Residential Building 0.94 0.85 0.82 0.66 0.60 0.24 1.25 1.14 1.11 1.05 0.94 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.65 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
516 417 E PEACH ST 0.37 217,345$ 805,355$ 1,022,700$ HELP CENTER INC Residential Building 1.10 0.90 0.81 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.77 0.75 0.71 0.68 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.64 0.60 0.54 0.42 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00517 605 N ROUSE AVE 0.15 117,540$ 417,860$ 535,400$ ARNOLD ROBERT W JR & PAMELA JAMGOCHIAN Residential Building 0.77 0.69 0.67 0.66 0.64 0.61 0.67 0.60 0.38 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.45 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.64 0.63 0.58 0.35 0.11 0.75 0.66 0.65 0.61 0.31 0.00
520 627 E PEACH ST 0.41 608,572$ 699,828$ 1,308,400$ MEDIA STATION INC Commercial Building 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00522 603 N MONTANA AVE 0.27 215,035$ 534,165$ 749,200$ LUNDGREN HANS E Misc Building 0.49 0.43 0.41 0.35 0.32 0.23 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.33 0.27 0.17 0.00 0.00
523 606 N BLACK AVE 0.18 621,183$ 442,117$ 1,063,300$ KNIGHT MERIDITH MCKENNEY Misc Building 0.25 0.15 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.54 0.51 0.46 0.34 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00526 609 N MONTANA AVE 0.20 345,526$ 463,974$ 809,500$ SIEBEL GONNIE I POUR OVER TRUST Misc Building 0.59 0.53 0.51 0.45 0.43 0.33 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.44 0.38 0.26 0.00 0.00
527 612 N MONTANA ST 0.16 858,310$ 424,845$ 1,283,155$ TOMPKINS ED & STACEY Residential Building 0.65 0.56 0.55 0.53 0.51 0.48 0.69 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.65 0.63 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.69 0.65 0.57 0.00 0.00528 117 E PEACH ST 0.15 330,528$ 407,072$ 737,600$ MOSBY KENNETH G & PHYLLIS G Residential Building 0.92 0.80 0.76 0.55 0.51 0.12 1.10 0.97 0.93 0.84 0.72 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.48 0.43 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.17 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.00
532 607 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.12 221,542$ 367,258$ 588,800$ MCCARTHY SHAWN P Misc Building 1.41 1.28 1.25 1.06 1.02 0.68 1.12 1.00 0.96 0.88 0.76 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.57 0.55 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.57 0.57 0.41 0.09 0.00535 613 N ROUSE AVE 0.16 74,718$ 418,182$ 492,900$ GEDDES CHRISTOPHER THATCHER & AMANDA LEE Misc Building 0.27 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.29 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.24 0.21 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.29 0.26 0.19 0.00 0.00
536 603 N CHURCH AVE 0.17 294,640$ 517,503$ 812,143$ FRY TIMOTHY R Residential Building 0.22 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.58 0.56 0.50 0.43 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.33 0.13 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00537 611 N BLACK AVE 0.24 202,477$ 507,923$ 710,400$ BRENCE HARRY T Residential Building 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.13 0.07 0.00 0.31 0.27 0.26 0.24 0.20 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
538 608 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 291,440$ 414,160$ 705,600$ WOODS NICHOLAS A Misc Building 1.10 1.02 0.99 0.90 0.87 0.74 1.06 0.91 0.87 0.75 0.63 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.98 0.91 0.76 0.00 0.00543 401 E PEACH ST 0.26 604,690$ 388,534$ 993,224$ JSC INVESTMENTS LLC Commercial Building 1.82 1.64 1.57 1.66 0.63 0.34 1.06 0.22 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.98 3.32 3.10 2.65 2.21 1.60 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.81 0.52 0.36 0.25 0.00 1.47 1.01 0.89 0.70 0.45 0.03
545 615 N MONTANA AVE 0.15 279,840$ 414,160$ 694,000$ DAVIS LOREN Misc Building 0.45 0.38 0.35 0.28 0.26 0.16 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.30 0.23 0.09 0.00 0.00547 611 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.18 225,693$ 448,907$ 674,600$ CESTERO BARBARA M Misc Building 1.07 0.96 0.93 0.73 0.69 0.22 0.95 0.84 0.81 0.73 0.63 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.33 0.27 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.00
548 612 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 102,140$ 414,160$ 516,300$ LINDSAY STACE Misc Building 2.03 1.93 1.90 1.79 1.75 1.60 2.03 1.88 1.84 1.76 1.65 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 1.49 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 1.10 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.17 1.92 1.83 1.65 0.00 0.00550 707 E PEACH ST 2.29 1,565,200$ 1,991,001$ 3,556,201$ CLOVERLEAF PROPERTY LLC Commercial Building 1.20 1.09 1.05 1.11 0.84 0.00 1.33 1.27 1.25 1.21 1.18 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 1.06 1.03 0.95 0.86 0.13 1.06 0.86 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00
552 620 E COTTONWOOD AVE 0.47 900,890$ 771,325$ 1,672,215$ BLOCK 106 LOT A CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 0.73 0.59 0.58 0.65 0.00 0.00 1.49 1.39 1.34 1.27 1.18 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 1.27 1.20 1.17 1.09 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00553 615 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.28 734,460$ 535,040$ 1,269,500$ GAGE JOSHUA & ANNE Residential Building 1.18 1.07 1.04 0.85 0.80 0.27 1.01 0.91 0.88 0.81 0.71 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.30 0.24 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.00 0.00
554 617 N ROUSE AVE 0.24 153,839$ 506,361$ 660,200$ MAXWELL JULIE K Residential Building 0.21 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Building Land Total 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year 500-Year Design Flow 100-Year 50-Year 25-Year 10-Year
Alternative ThreeBuilding Inundation Depth (ft)
ID Address Total Acres
Value
Owner Name
Alternative Four
Building Type
Alternative One Alternative TwoExisting Conditions No Action Conditions
555 616 N ROUSE AVE 0.15 454,365$ 245,835$ 700,200$ MORRISON JOHN P & Residential Building 0.94 0.84 0.77 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.41 0.35 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.50 0.44 0.26 0.00 0.00
556 CHURCH AVE 0.89 11,500$ 1,149,893$ 1,161,393$ BOZEMAN CREEK WAREHOUSES CONDO MASTER Misc Building 1.34 1.04 0.95 1.09 0.69 0.55 0.52 0.50 0.49 0.44 0.39 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.64 0.51 0.36 0.28 0.15 1.21 0.81 0.69 0.50 0.30 0.03557 619 N MONTANA AVE 0.15 261,940$ 414,160$ 676,100$ BARSNESS JOHN C & JANINE M Misc Building 0.46 0.39 0.36 0.28 0.26 0.16 0.32 0.23 0.21 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.29 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.00
560 630 E COTTONWOOD ST 0.16 118,442$ 390,358$ 508,800$ RCAR LLC Commercial Building 0.69 0.62 0.48 0.57 0.37 0.00 0.67 0.66 0.65 0.63 0.61 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.60 0.58 0.54 0.47 0.00 0.50 0.40 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00561 E CEDAR ST 4.52 6,540$ 2,041,091$ 2,047,631$ PONCELET GREG R & MELINDA G Misc Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.89 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
563 621 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.22 945,080$ 486,874$ 1,431,954$ SHAIDA PETER CHRISTOPHER & JULIA PALMORE Misc Building 1.25 1.15 1.13 0.98 0.94 0.60 1.21 1.10 1.07 1.01 0.91 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.69 0.65 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.56 0.56 0.55 0.00 0.00564 618 N WALLACE AVE 0.22 741,307$ 731,593$ 1,472,900$ POMEGRANATE LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
568 620 N ROUSE AVE 0.22 237,780$ 577,075$ 814,855$ SOVULEWSKI DAVID Misc Building 1.00 0.83 0.72 0.69 0.15 0.07 0.37 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.22 0.20 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.24 0.17 0.03 0.00 0.00570 620 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 126,640$ 414,160$ 540,800$ MOSS ROBB ERIC SHEDWICK TRUSTEE & Residential Building 1.74 1.69 1.67 1.60 1.59 1.47 1.70 1.63 1.60 1.57 1.52 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.59 1.04 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.62 1.46 1.45 0.51 0.00 0.00 1.76 1.63 1.58 1.48 0.00 0.00
572 626 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 511,840$ 414,160$ 926,000$ SAVERUD ANNA B & Misc Building 1.77 1.72 1.70 1.64 1.62 1.51 1.71 1.65 1.62 1.59 1.54 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 1.04 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 1.46 1.45 0.49 0.00 0.00 1.77 1.64 1.60 1.50 0.00 0.00576 621 N ROUSE AVE 0.24 420,940$ 505,399$ 926,339$ MAXWELL JULIE K Residential Building 0.84 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.67 0.68 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.62 0.59 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.67 0.64 0.56 0.00 0.00
577 626 E COTTONWOOD ST 0.26 7,800$ 525,451$ 533,251$ MILL STREET LOFT CONDO MASTER Residential Building 0.63 0.49 0.35 0.38 0.18 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.63 0.55 0.51 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.48 0.43 0.41 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00581 N MONTANA AVE 0.11 -$ 353,035$ 353,035$ DELESALLE PROJECTS MONTANA INC Residential Building 0.86 0.81 0.80 0.75 0.73 0.60 0.74 0.69 0.68 0.65 0.58 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.43 0.42 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.70 0.66 0.56 0.00 0.00
588 725 E COTTONWOOD ST 0.25 59,841$ 530,759$ 590,600$ EAST COTTONWOOD AND FRONT LLC Commercial Building 2.72 2.53 2.47 2.43 2.17 1.31 2.96 2.88 2.85 2.78 2.71 2.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 1.90 1.79 1.46 1.15 1.14 2.74 2.55 2.48 2.37 2.26 1.25 2.53 2.29 2.13 1.31 0.00 0.00590 708 N ROUSE AVE 0.65 2,902,696$ 691,604$ 3,594,300$ PURE HOLDINGS LLC Misc Building 0.46 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.14 0.11 0.23 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.21 0.18 0.13 0.03 0.00
591 701 N MONTANA AVE 0.15 622,640$ 414,160$ 1,036,800$ ALSENTZER GUY Misc Building 0.79 0.56 0.53 0.42 0.23 0.00 0.80 0.55 0.48 0.25 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.43 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00592 702 N BOZEMAN AVE 0.15 95,740$ 414,160$ 509,900$ GYR PHILIP TRUSTEE Residential Building 0.85 0.79 0.77 0.70 0.67 0.00 1.20 1.14 1.11 1.06 0.98 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.93 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00
593 713 E COTTONWOOD RD 0.16 454,310$ 517,503$ 971,813$ BRIEF ANDREW S & KELLY L Residential Building 0.35 0.26 0.24 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.87 0.86 0.83 0.80 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.79 0.76 0.69 0.35 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00594 717 E COTTONWOOD AVE 0.08 348,649$ 383,351$ 732,000$ FAIRCHILDS JOSHUA R & Misc Building 0.38 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.54 0.52 0.45 0.38 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
599 425 E COTTONWOOD ST 0.61 66,823$ 904,677$ 971,500$ STOLZFUS RICHARD W & KAREN SCHMIDT TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.34 0.14 0.10 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
601 105 E COTTONWOOD ST 0.18 196,834$ 543,466$ 740,300$ GOODACRE R TIM & DENISE M TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.67 0.62 0.61 0.49 0.41 0.00 1.01 0.96 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.34 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
603 428 S BOZEMAN AVE 0.11 734,291$ 358,209$ 1,092,500$ HARRISON LANCE & MARTHA TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.25 0.13 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
604 707 E COTTONWOOD RD 0.24 92,602$ 616,798$ 709,400$ MATTHEWS GREGORY TRUSTEE Residential Building 0.64 0.54 0.51 0.46 0.00 0.00 1.16 1.12 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 1.06 1.04 0.98 0.67 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00605 0.14 -$ 323,234$ 323,234$ PAVLIC ROBERT & Commercial Building 1.03 0.76 0.65 0.60 0.03 0.00 1.18 1.11 1.08 1.02 0.93 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.28 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.88 0.74 0.45 0.25 0.00 0.68 0.27 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
606 705 E COTTONWOOD RD 0.24 21,502$ 616,798$ 638,300$ BIG DOG REAL ESTATE LLC Residential Building 0.58 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.12 0.00 0.76 0.71 0.69 0.66 0.63 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.60 0.57 0.51 0.48 0.00 0.53 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00610 712 N BLACK AVE 0.18 144,534$ 543,466$ 688,000$ REISTAD CORY Residential Building 0.80 0.75 0.73 0.62 0.58 0.00 1.54 1.49 1.48 1.45 1.40 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
611 717 N CHURCH AVE 0.34 223,250$ 703,898$ 927,148$ OTT PATRICK J & CHERYL L Misc Building 0.35 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.36 0.33 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.32 0.28 0.22 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00613 FRONT ST 0.08 -$ 672,725$ 672,725$ MONTANA RAIL LINK Commercial Building 0.32 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.47 0.43 0.35 0.25 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
618 715 N MONTANA AVE 0.11 180,134$ 367,766$ 547,900$ BOZEMAN PROJECT LLC Misc Building 0.83 0.73 0.70 0.64 0.63 0.57 0.87 0.79 0.76 0.71 0.66 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.72 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00620 N IDA AVE 0.24 115,130$ 504,783$ 619,913$ GIOVANINI TERRY L Commercial Building 0.32 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.39 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.26 0.23 0.18 0.12 0.00 0.20 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
621 710 E ASPEN ST 0.16 239,897$ 517,503$ 757,400$ EDGAR BRIAN SYDNEY Residential Building 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.30 0.29 0.27 0.20 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00622 601 COTTONWOOD ST 0.48 1,191,810$ 774,292$ 1,966,102$ THOMPSON SAMUEL S III & BEAM TRUSTEE Commercial Building 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.37 0.34 0.28 0.23 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.18 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
626 724 N WALLACE AVE 0.21 232,210$ 460,422$ 692,632$ NORTH WALLACE DESIGN GUILD LLC Commercial Building 0.64 0.49 0.44 0.38 0.26 0.00 0.94 0.86 0.83 0.77 0.71 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.61 0.54 0.44 0.34 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00627 717 N MONTANA AVE 0.11 270,290$ 365,664$ 635,954$ ZELL WILLIAM A Residential Building 1.64 1.54 1.51 1.45 1.44 1.38 1.69 1.61 1.58 1.52 1.48 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.71 1.53 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
630 721 N MONTANA AVE 0.23 472,700$ 493,626$ 966,326$ WALSH RENO & HEATHER Misc Building 0.66 0.56 0.54 0.48 0.47 0.41 0.70 0.63 0.60 0.54 0.50 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.55 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00632 414 E ASPEN ST 0.12 110,167$ 459,533$ 569,700$ LINDELL KAREN R Residential Building 1.57 1.13 0.98 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.60 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.34 0.88 0.73 0.35 0.00 0.00
633 420 ASPEN LN 0.07 96,191$ 356,409$ 452,600$ DRYSDALE FAMILY LLC Misc Building 1.17 0.72 0.57 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.33 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.56 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00635 410 E ASPEN ST 0.21 154,243$ 571,957$ 726,200$ SMITH VERNON TELFORD IV Residential Building 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
636 N ROUSE AVE 1.97 709,120$ 1,475,394$ 2,184,514$ CITY OF BOZEMAN Commercial Building 0.44 0.32 0.30 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.35 0.30 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.08 0.00 0.42 0.34 0.32 0.29 0.18 0.00637 802 N ROUSE AVE 0.16 44,112$ 506,788$ 550,900$ NEWEY ROBERT S & LELA A TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.89 0.54 0.43 0.45 0.12 0.07 0.24 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.16 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.32 0.20 0.11 0.00 0.00
638 802 N WALLACE AVE 0.33 2,091,915$ 607,085$ 2,699,000$ WALLACE NORTH LLC Commercial Building 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.18 0.15 0.11 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00642 808 N ROUSE AVE 0.10 188,930$ 417,144$ 606,074$ MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Misc Building 1.13 0.80 0.70 0.72 0.38 0.33 0.54 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.43 0.40 0.31 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.00 0.00
643 803 N BLACK AVE 0.11 50,082$ 444,618$ 494,700$ ROY CAROLINE S TRUSTEE & Residential Building 1.19 1.13 1.11 1.00 0.96 0.00 1.84 1.75 1.72 1.65 1.51 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.87 0.78 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00646 415 E ASPEN ST 0.23 107,460$ 595,351$ 702,811$ STEWART LUCIA TRUST Residential Building 0.83 0.56 0.47 0.42 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 1.21 1.06 0.80 0.00 0.00
647 411 E ASPEN ST 0.17 464,410$ 533,097$ 997,507$ KEES CHARLES & SHARA Residential Building 1.30 0.93 0.82 0.83 0.57 0.53 0.79 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.65 0.65 0.60 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.97 0.76 0.74 0.00 0.00
648 425 ASPEN LN 0.27 109,770$ 649,830$ 759,600$ STEWART LUCIA TRUSTEE Misc Building 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 1.44 1.24 0.85 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
649 807 N BLACK AVE 0.20 361,498$ 562,302$ 923,800$ 113 LLC Residential Building 0.69 0.65 0.64 0.66 0.57 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.79 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.48 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
650 810 N ROUSE AVE 0.10 230,254$ 419,646$ 649,900$ BABINEAU-Z CHELAN & HEATHER MCDONNELL Residential Building 0.71 0.39 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.12 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.29 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00654 2.11 -$ 1,544,031$ 1,544,031$ CITY OF BOZEMAN Commercial Building 0.71 0.65 0.64 0.58 0.56 0.38 0.60 0.53 0.50 0.46 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.49 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
655 412 E TAMARACK ST 0.58 320,200$ 867,140$ 1,187,340$ STOLTZFUS RICHARD W & KAREN SCHMIDT TRUSTEES Commercial Building 0.94 0.61 0.46 0.51 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.38 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00657 815 N BLACK AVE 0.31 157,128$ 681,172$ 838,300$ SCHUTZ JASON Residential Building 0.31 0.11 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
658 816 N TRACY AVE 0.16 128,378$ 515,922$ 644,300$ GEISE BOBBI J Residential Building 0.24 0.21 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00659 816 N ROUSE AVE 0.12 213,187$ 441,913$ 655,100$ ESSLINGER JUSTINE JANE & BRIAN LEE 50% INT & Residential Building 0.91 0.70 0.65 0.65 0.46 0.43 0.55 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.48 0.46 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.58 0.51 0.44 0.00 0.00
660 0.34 -$ 557,375$ 557,375$ MONTANA RAIL LINK INC Commercial Building 0.71 0.62 0.58 0.52 0.25 0.12 1.06 1.04 1.03 1.01 0.98 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.33 0.29 0.18 0.00 0.00 1.02 0.95 0.88 0.72 0.54 0.21 0.84 0.53 0.40 0.17 0.00 0.00662 822 N ROUSE AVE 0.11 234,457$ 429,943$ 664,400$ SEPPI DINO VINCENT Residential Building 0.93 0.68 0.60 0.60 0.41 0.34 0.56 0.42 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.22 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.44 0.40 0.28 0.05 0.00 0.85 0.56 0.52 0.42 0.16 0.00
663 20 E TAMARACK ST 0.23 116,580$ 596,820$ 713,400$ KOLLER LAUREL & PAUL T & Residential Building 0.33 0.29 0.28 0.22 0.16 0.00 0.32 0.31 0.30 0.29 0.27 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00664 20 E TAMARACK ST 0.23 116,580$ 596,820$ 713,400$ KOLLER LAUREL & PAUL T & Residential Building 0.45 0.41 0.40 0.32 0.27 0.00 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
666 411 E TAMARACK ST 0.20 365,822$ 467,978$ 833,800$ LIGHT CONVERSATION USA INC Residential Building 1.36 1.17 1.12 1.12 0.97 0.92 1.02 0.91 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.94 0.92 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.28 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.72 0.00667 423 E TAMARACK ST 0.25 225,920$ 509,480$ 735,400$ USHER JOHN F III & SUSAN M Residential Building 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
668 417 E TAMARACK ST 0.27 581,630$ 534,982$ 1,116,612$ CONVERO MT LLC Residential Building 0.36 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.22 0.21 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.45 0.41 0.20 0.00 0.00676 922 N ROUSE AVE 1.03 174,990$ 951,127$ 1,126,117$ AAMO HOLINGS LLC Residential Building 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.23 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
678 1010 N ROUSE AVE 2.52 352,350$ 1,745,099$ 2,097,449$ AAMO HOLDINGS LLC Commercial Building 0.21 0.14 0.12 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00681 901 N BLACK AVE 64.04 27,795,380$ 17,449,039$ 45,244,419$ GALLATIN CO FAIRGROUNDS Commercial Building 0.59 0.51 0.48 0.52 0.31 0.00 0.72 0.59 0.56 0.48 0.38 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
682 TAMARACK ST 7.82 34,089,200$ 4,206,751$ 38,295,951$ CITY OF BOZEMAN Commercial Building 1.37 1.22 1.18 1.32 1.09 1.04 1.38 1.31 1.26 1.10 0.99 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 1.14 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.12 0.95 1.37 1.24 1.22 1.19 1.14 0.00684 CEDAR ST 1.57 246,220$ 1,239,931$ 1,486,151$ SCOUT DAC LLC Residential Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.38 1.31 1.19 1.09 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
686 511 E TAMARACK ST 5.01 812,950$ 2,771,305$ 3,584,255$ CAMO HOLDINGS LLC Commercial Building 0.35 0.27 0.23 0.19 0.02 0.00 0.59 0.55 0.53 0.50 0.46 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.44 0.39 0.31 0.19 0.00 0.39 0.11 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00687 1104 N ROUSE AVE 2.67 469,330$ 1,749,403$ 2,218,733$ KENYON NOBLE LUMBER CO Commercial Building 0.61 0.50 0.47 0.62 0.36 0.33 0.44 0.35 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.21 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.40 0.38 0.32 0.18 0.00 0.62 0.45 0.41 0.36 0.21 0.00
693 801 L ST 2.27 1,089,130$ 2,075,044$ 3,164,174$ REMP LLC Commercial Building 0.84 0.70 0.65 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.79 0.77 0.74 0.69 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.20 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.66 0.62 0.54 0.26 0.00 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00695 1203 N ROUSE AVE 0.19 1,884,337$ 744,963$ 2,629,300$ CANNERY DISTRICT PARTNERS LLC Commercial Building 0.31 0.13 0.09 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
696 1237 N ROUSE AVE 0.44 1,406,459$ 1,243,541$ 2,650,000$ TURCZYN JUMP LLC Commercial Building 0.35 0.23 0.19 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
698 1212 N ROUSE AVE 0.34 464,840$ 618,896$ 1,083,736$ PORTEUS CURTIS & ALISA TRUSTEES Residential Building 0.97 0.72 0.64 0.70 0.47 0.43 0.90 0.56 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.60 0.50 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.61 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.73 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
699 415 E BIRCH ST 0.30 263,500$ 578,817$ 842,317$ ZIMTOR ARCHITECTURE LLC Residential Building 1.14 0.82 0.69 1.02 0.46 0.43 0.90 0.55 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.92 0.74 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.59 0.47 0.30 0.28 0.00 1.00 0.62 0.46 0.29 0.24 0.00
703 1220 N ROUSE AVE 0.50 205,830$ 539,452$ 745,282$ BIG SKY MONTANA PROPERTIES LLC Commercial Building 1.47 1.15 1.06 1.25 0.87 0.85 1.23 0.92 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.20 1.06 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.92 0.87 0.75 0.68 0.00 1.37 1.03 0.92 0.81 0.72 0.00707 0.57 3,640$ 120,337$ 123,977$ VANDEWALLE KENNETH J & KRISTIN Misc Building 1.51 0.98 0.73 0.39 0.30 0.00 1.13 0.99 0.90 0.76 0.61 0.43 2.36 2.12 2.01 1.63 0.73 0.00 1.17 0.75 0.64 0.38 0.12 0.00 0.70 0.53 0.45 0.32 0.20 0.00 0.49 0.35 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
708 1220 N ROUSE AVE 0.50 205,830$ 539,452$ 745,282$ BIG SKY MONTANA PROPERTIES LLC Commercial Building 0.71 0.30 0.18 0.35 0.17 0.14 0.37 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.27 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.12 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00709 211 E OAK ST 0.46 3,068,126$ 1,190,274$ 4,258,400$ CANNERY DISTRICT PARTNERS LLC Commercial Building 1.32 1.25 1.22 1.09 1.09 0.34 1.13 1.11 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 0.85 0.75 0.43 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.78 0.48 0.34 0.00 0.00
711 716 E OAK ST 3.90 289,220$ 440,120$ 729,340$ FIGGINS DANIEL L & SANDRA L Residential Building 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.37 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.31 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.18 0.09 0.00 0.22 0.20 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00712 117 E OAK ST 0.29 2,124,976$ 889,524$ 3,014,500$ CANNERY DISTRICT PARTNERS LLC Commercial Building 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.04 0.95 0.84 1.10 1.05 1.04 1.04 0.99 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.88 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.92 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.74 0.94 0.89 0.88 0.87 0.86 0.00
713 803 OAK ST 1.49 102,390$ 360,359$ 462,749$ STECKMEST MITCHELL E Residential Building 0.58 0.48 0.45 0.38 0.31 0.00 0.75 0.64 0.60 0.54 0.47 0.40 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.95 0.93 0.88 0.85 0.78 0.60 0.48 0.44 0.34 0.26 0.00 0.47 0.39 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00717 701 OAK ST 2.39 158,720$ 403,883$ 562,603$ FIGGINS SANDRA L Misc Building 1.10 1.02 0.99 0.96 0.77 0.00 1.20 1.18 1.16 1.12 1.08 1.04 1.13 1.05 1.01 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.31 1.25 1.15 1.07 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.88 0.81 0.75 0.00 1.00 0.90 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00
719 105 E OAK ST 0.16 476,540$ 575,385$ 1,051,925$ BUILDING N CONDO MASTER Commercial Building 2.69 2.63 2.62 2.71 2.55 2.44 2.75 2.66 2.64 2.60 2.54 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.54 2.40 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.11 2.05 2.03 2.00 1.97 1.38 2.54 2.47 2.46 2.44 2.41 0.00720 111 E OAK ST 0.35 3,709,728$ 1,025,472$ 4,735,200$ CANNERY DISTRICT PARTNERS LLC Commercial Building 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
722 109 E OAK ST 0.39 4,129,707$ 1,110,793$ 5,240,500$ CANNERY DISTRICT PARTNERS LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00723 701 GOLD AVE 10.55 13,681,370$ 3,521,230$ 17,202,600$ RIFFLE LLC Commercial Building 0.30 0.11 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.42 0.39 0.33 0.27 0.19 0.48 0.34 0.27 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.48 0.40 0.24 0.12 0.00 0.46 0.23 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
724 1401 GOLD AVE 0.43 627,430$ 413,770$ 1,041,200$ GOLD PROPERTIES LLC Commercial Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.60 0.55 0.40 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00726 107 E OAK ST 0.27 4,347,201$ 903,999$ 5,251,200$ CANNERY DISTRICT PARTNERS LLC Commercial Building 5.24 5.15 5.12 3.32 4.95 4.52 4.94 4.87 4.84 4.79 4.72 2.66 1.33 1.28 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.89 0.82 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.30 4.19 4.16 3.98 2.51 1.84 4.72 4.55 4.48 3.93 2.83 0.00
727 715 E OAK ST 2.91 322,650$ 426,350$ 749,000$ BERTELSEN TROY & LEI ANNA Misc Building 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00728 1410 N ROUSE AVE 3.26 778,031$ 1,539,269$ 2,317,300$ WILD WEST LAND & DEVELOPMENT LLC (79%) & Commercial Building 2.02 1.72 1.62 1.90 1.42 1.39 1.93 1.60 1.41 1.20 1.13 0.68 2.48 1.92 1.79 1.36 0.00 0.00 1.41 1.23 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.63 1.51 1.33 1.21 1.08 2.05 1.68 1.54 1.33 1.20 0.00
729 1413 GOLD AVE 0.49 520,939$ 455,461$ 976,400$ 1413 GOLD AVENUE LLC Commercial Building 0.33 0.24 0.23 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.30 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00730 1520 N ROUSE AVE 0.74 461,120$ 599,356$ 1,060,476$ BLEHM 3 LLC Commercial Building 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
731 0.94 355,034$ 713,366$ 1,068,400$ CENTURY WAREHOUSING INC Commercial Building 1.33 1.24 1.21 1.38 1.14 1.12 1.29 1.18 1.13 1.07 1.02 0.45 1.41 1.26 1.19 1.02 0.00 0.00 1.15 1.09 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 1.17 1.14 1.11 1.09 0.80 1.34 1.23 1.17 1.13 1.09 0.00732 1500 N 7TH AVE 28.05 -$ 15,125,833$ 15,125,833$ WESTLAKE GEORGE E & Commercial Building 0.67 0.44 0.37 0.26 0.12 0.00 0.65 0.46 0.40 0.26 0.09 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX D
Community Engagement
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
See Bozeman Creek Project
the creek between us by Mountain Time Arts
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Revitaliseʌᴉʇɐlǝɹ by Ben Pease and Jim Madden
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Paddleboarder Activism
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX E
Existing Facilities
Church Ave. Footbridge
Church Ave. Galligator Trail Crossing
Story St. Crossing
Bogert Park Pedestrian Crossing
Rouse Ave. and Olive Ave. Tunnel
Babcock St. Tunnel
Main St. TunnelBar 9 Pedestrian Bridge
Main St. Alley CrossingMendenhall St. Crossing
City Hall Pedestrian Bridge Lamme St. Crossing
Rouse Ave. Private Drive Crossing
Rouse Ave. Crossing
Peach St. Crossing
Tamarack St. Footbridge
Tamarack St. Crossing
Warehouse Road Crossing
Railroad Bridge
Interstate 90 Crossing
Story Mill Spur Trail Crossing
Gold Ave. Crossing
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
FIGURE: E-1DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 420 840 1,260
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Existing Structures.mxd1 inch = 833 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
EXISTING CROSSING STRUCTURES
LEGEND
Culvert Barrel Locations
Crossing Structure Locations
Channel Centerline
Mill Diversion Crossing
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
Church Ave. Galligator Crossing (1 of 2)
Church Ave. Crossing
Church Ave. Galligator Crossing (2 of 2)
Wallace Ave. Footbridge
Wallace Ave. Galligator Crossing
Main St. Tunnel Village Downtown Blvd. Crossing
Village Downtown Blvd. Railroad Crossing
Simkins Road Crossing
Front St. Railroad Crossing (1 of 2)
Front St. Crossing
Front St. Railroad Crossing (2 of 2)
Cedar St. Crossing
Interstate 90 Crossing
Bohart Rd. Crossing
FIGURE: E-2DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 330 660 990
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Mill Ditch Existing Structures.mxd1 inch = 667 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
MILL DITCH
EXISTING CROSSING STRUCTURES
LEGEND
Culvert Barrel Locations
Crossing Structure Locations
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Crossing Structure Passes
No modeled event
10% AEP
4% AEP
2% AEP
1% AEP
Design Event
0.2% AEP
Bozeman Creek Crossing Structures
Structure
Order Crossing Structure Hydraulic
Capacity (cfs) Description
1 Church Ave. Footbridge 740 Footbridge near S. Church Ave.
2 Church Ave. Galligator Crossing 1035 Galligator Trail crossing near S. Church
Ave.
3 Story St. Crossing 551 Stream crossing for Story St.
4 Bogert Park Pedestrian Crossing 779 Pedestrian bridge for Bogert Park
5 Rouse Ave. and Olive Ave.
Tunnel 637 Stream crossing tunnel for Rouse Ave.
and Olive Ave.
6 Babcock St. Tunnel 528 Stream crossing for E. Babcock St. and
buildings on south side of Babcock St.
7
Main St. Tunnel
622
Crossing structure for Main St.,
buildings on north and south side of
Main St., and alley south of Main St.
8 Bar 9 Pedestrian Bridge 303 Pedestrian bridge for Bar 9 bar
9 Main St. Alley Crossing 451 Alley bridge north of Main St.
10 Mendenhall St. Crossing 344 Stream crossing for Mendenhall St.
11 City Hall Pedestrian Bridge 603 Pedestrian bridge for City Hall
12 Lamme St. Crossing 237 Stream crossing for Lamme St.
13 Rouse Ave. Private Drive
Crossing 517 Bridge to private residential home off
Rouse Ave.
14 Rouse Ave. Crossing 390 Stream crossing under Rouse Ave. Box
culvert filled with 2.5 ft of rock
15 Peach St. Crossing 514 Stream Crossing under Peach St. Box
culvert filled with 3.5 of rock
16 Tamarack St. Footbridge 819 Footbridge near Tamarack St.
17 Tamarack St. Crossing 829 Stream crossing for Tamarack St.
18 Warehouse Road Crossing 805 Private structure for Kenyon Noble
Distribution Center
19 Railroad Bridge Upstream of I-
90 862 Railroad bridge near E. Birch St.
Railroad is inactive.
20 I-90 Interstate Culvert Stream
Crossing 870 Culvert crossing under I-90
22 Gold Ave. Crossing 820 Main Channel stream crossing under
Gold Ave.
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Mill Ditch Crossing Structures
Structure
Order Crossing Structure Hydraulic
Capacity (cfs) Description
1 Church Ave. Galligator Crossing
(1 of 2) 46 Galligator Trail crossing near Church
Ave.
2 Church Ave. Crossing 129 Stream crossing for S. Church Ave.
3 Church Ave. Galligator Crossing
(2 of 2) 131 Galligator Trail crossing near Church
Ave.
4 Wallace Ave. Footbridge 178 Footbridge Galligator Trail crossing near
Wallace Ave.
5 Wallace Ave. Galligator
Crossing 178 Galligator Trail crossing near Wallace
Ave.
6 Main St. Tunnel 178 Stream crossing for Main St.
7 Village Downtown Blvd.
Crossing 183 Stream crossing for Village Downtown
Blvd.
8 Village Downtown Blvd.
Railroad Crossing 195 Railroad crossing near Village
Downtown Blvd.
9 Simkins Road Crossing 130 Stream crossing for Simpkins access
10 Front St. Crossing 202 Access road crossing near Front St.
11 Front St. Railroad Crossing (1 of
2) 150 Railroad crossing near Front St. (1 of 2)
12 Front St. Railroad Crossing (2 of
2) 159 Railroad crossing near Front St. (2 of 2)
13 Cedar St. Crossing 54 Stream crossing for Cedar St.
14 Interstate 90 Crossing 120 Culvert crossing under I-90
15 Bohart Rd. Crossing 63 Stream crossing for Bohart Rd.
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX F
Historical Resources
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Flood of 1948
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Flood of 1963
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Flood of 1981
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Flood of 2011
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
FIGURE: 4DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 10/24/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 525 1,050 1,575
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Historical Register.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
HISTORIC RESOURCESBOZEMAN, MT
LEGEND
Historic Building
2D Model Boundary
Historic District
Channel Centerline
NOTE: HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS ARE DETERMINED BY THE NATIONAL REGISTER
OF HISTORIC PLACES
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX G
Environmental Resources
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
East Gallatin River
Unnamed Irrigation Ditch
Unnamed Irrigation Ditch
Unnamed Irrigation Ditch
FIGURE: 3DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Environmental Resources.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESBOZEMAN, MT
LEGEND
Channel Centerline
Riparian Wetland Type
Forested/Shrub Riparian
Herbaceous Riparian
Riverine
Wetland Type
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX H
Effective Mapping
U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Services Agency Aerial Photography Field Office.
FIGURE: 2DRAWN BY: AFDATE: 10/2/2024PROJECT: BOZEMAN FLOOD STUDY
³0 680 1,360 2,040Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\23-157 Basemap.mxd1 inch = 1,351 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKEFFECTIVE MAPPINGDOWNTOWN BOZEMAN
LEGEND
BOZEMAN SFHA
AE, 1 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
AE, ADMINISTRATIVE FLOODWAY
ZONE AE, FLOODWAY
ZONE X, 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
X, 1 PCT DEPTH LESS THAN 1 FOOT
BOZEMAN CREEK FLOOD MITIGATION AND RECLAMATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT
ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
APPENDIX I
Alternatives Overview
Mill DitchBozeman CreekE
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
i
v
e
r
MSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: 1DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 520 1,040 1,560
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Project Overview.mxd1 inch = 1,042 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
PROJECT OVERVIEWBOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
2D Model Boundary
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
Mill DitchBozeman CreekE
G
a
l
l
a
t
i
n
R
i
v
e
r
MSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: 9DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 420 840 1,260
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Alt 1 Overview.mxd1 inch = 833 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
ALTERNATIVE 1 OVERVIEWBOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Proposed Crossing Structure Replacement
Channel Centerline
Proposed Channel
2D Model Boundary
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
MSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: PROP. TRAILS ALT 1DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/13/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 420 840 1,260
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 ALT 1 Proposed Commuter Trail.mxd1 inch = 833 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKPROPOSED COMMUTER TRAILSALTERNATIVE ONE
LEGEND
CROSSING STRUCTURE
PROPOSED TRAILS
BIRCH ST. TO STORY MILL SPUR TRAIL
CHANNEL BANK TRAIL
BICYCLE FACILITY TYPE
BIKE LANE
SHARED USE PATH
TRAIL
COB PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
AREA OF DISTURBANCE
Mill Ditc
h
Bozeman CreekMSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: 10DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/1/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 250 500 750
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Alt 2 Overview.mxd1 inch = 500 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Feet IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: North American 1983False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
ALTERNATIVE 2 OVERVIEWBOZEMAN, MONTANA
LEGEND
Proposed Crossing Structure Replacement
Channel Centerline
Proposed Channel
2D Model Boundary
BOZEMAN CREEKRESTORATION
Mill Ditch
MSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: PROP. TRAILS ALT 2DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/13/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 250 500 750
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 ALT 2 Proposed Commuter Trail.mxd1 inch = 500 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEKPROPOSED COMMUTER TRAILSALTERNATIVE TWO
LEGEND
CROSSING STRUCTURE
PROPOSED TRAILS
MAIN ST. TRAIL CONNECTION
MAIN ST. TRAIL CONNECTION - CONCRETE
OPTIONAL RAILROAD TRAIL
BICYCLE FACILITY TYPE
BIKE LANE
SHARED USE PATH
TRAIL
COB PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITY
CHANNEL CENTERLINE
AREA OF DISTURBANCE
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
MSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: 11DRAWN BY: AKH
DATE: 5/21/2025PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 420 840 1,260
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Alt 3 Overview.mxd1 inch = 833 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
LEGEND
Proposed Crossing Structure Replacement
2D Model Boundary
Channel Centerline
ALTERNATIVE THREE
OVERVIEW
BOZEMAN, MT
Bozeman Creek
Mill Ditch
MSL, MDT, County Govt, Federal, Tribal
FIGURE: 11DRAWN BY: AKHDATE: 11/22/2024
PROJECT: BOZEMAN CREEK RESTORATION
³0 420 840 1,260
Feet
P:\2023\23-157 Bozeman Creek PER and Plan\07 CIM\ArcGIS\Figures\23-157 Alt 3 Overview.mxd1 inch = 833 feet
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane Montana FIPS 2500 Ft IntlProjection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011False Easting: 1,968,503.9370False Northing: 0.0000Central Meridian: -109.5000Standard Parallel 1: 45.0000Standard Parallel 2: 49.0000Latitude Of Origin: 44.2500Units: Foot
MSL, MDT, County Govt,Federal, Tribal
LEGEND
Proposed Crossing Structure Replacement
2D Model Boundary
Channel Centerline
BOZEMAN CREEK
RESTORATION
ALTERNATIVE FOUR
OVERVIEW
BOZEMAN, MT