Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout027 Track C Culvert Revision Memo MEMO 32 Discovery Drive  Bozeman, MT 59718  (406) 582-0221  Fax (406) 582-5770 To: City of Bozeman From: Rory Romey, PE, Andrew Graham, PE, CFM, Eric Foss, PE Project Name: Track C Rail Extension Site Plan Project Number: 14-167.10 Date: 7/18/2025 Re: Track C Culvert Revisions and Effects Introduction The purpose of this memo is to outline the effects of the revised culvert configuration proposed for the Track C crossing at Mandeville Creek. The crossing was originally modeled as a 144-inch equivalent CMP Arch culvert; the current configuration consists of a 138-inch CMP. Background The update to the 2016 Flood Hazard Evaluation (FHE) for Mandeville Creek (dated 2/14/2025) was accepted by the City of Bozeman as part of the Master Site Plan Modification for the North Park Development. This FHE included modeling the impacts of the proposed Track C crossing at Mandeville Creek. The structure for this crossing was modeled as a 144-inch equivalent CMPA culvert (171”x110”) with a 1-foot embedment depth. The model shows water surface elevations during the 100-year event equalizing at an elevation of 4674.5 on both sides of the proposed CMPA culvert. This is a result of the existing 36-inch culvert at the main rail line being undersized and unable to pass the 100-year peak flow rate of 517-cfs. A large area of ponded backwater occurs in the vicinity of the Track C rail crossing and the overtopping flow follows the existing overflow path to the northwest as described and shown in the FHE. Revised Culvert The structure for this crossing is now proposed as a 138-inch diameter CMP with approximately 2.3- feet of embedment depth. Constraints stemming from the railroad’s E80 loading criteria and manufacturing limitations have pushed the design towards a slightly smaller pipe with a different shape. The round culvert will be hydraulically less efficient than the arch culvert. However, the resulting water surface elevations within the Track C Condition and subsequent scenarios of the accepted FHE remain unaffected. This revised culvert is still large enough that water surface elevations will equalize on each side during the peak flow from 100-year event. This results in an identical floodplain boundary to what is shown in the accepted FHE.