The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About019 - Appendix Q - Water Design Report SRX-II SUBDIVISION WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN REPORT February 2025 PREPARED BY: MMI #: 5659.021 N:\5659\021 - SWX North Pre-Plat\04 Design\Reports\Water\5659.021_WaterDesignReport.docx Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) .............................................................................................. 1 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM (DEQ 1.1.2):........................................................................ 2 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) ................................................................................................................ 2 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) ................................................................................................................... 3 6 WATER USE DATA (1.1.5): ................................................................................................................. 3 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) .......................................................................................................... 5 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) ............................................................................................. 6 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) ................................................................................ 6 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) ......................................................................................... 6 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) ............................................................................................................ 6 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) .................................................................................................................... 6 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) ................................................................................................................ 6 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) ......................................................................................................................... 6 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) ...................................................................................................... 6 APPENDICES Appendix A Vicinity Map Appendix B Distribution System Map (City of Bozeman GIS Infrastructure Viewer) Appendix C Groundwater Monitoring Appendix D Water Model Calibration Appendix E WaterCAD Results Appendix F NRCS Soils Report Appendix G Geotechnical Report Appendix H Corrosivity Analysis Appendix I Water and Sewer Layout Written By: RSN Checked By: CMS Approved By: BJH Project No.: 5659.021 1 South Range Crossing North Subdivision Water System Design Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a basis for design of the SRX-II Subdivision water distribution system. The water distribution system serving SRX-II will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); The City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Fire Service Line Standard. The design report is provided to show that there is adequate volume and pressure to supply domestic and fire service the proposed development. The following design report follows the section numbering of Circular DEQ-1-Standards for Water Works (2022 Edition) Section 1.1, Engineer’s Report. 2 GENERAL INFORMATION (DEQ 1.1.1) a. The proposed SRX-II Subdivision encompasses a total of 35.06 acres and is generally located at the northeast corner of Graf Street and South 19th Avenue. The property is within the boundaries of the City of Bozeman, Montana and was annexed in August of 2006. The development is proposed to be zoned REMU with the exception of Block 1 zoned B2-M. The following is the legal description for the property: Being Lots 1,2,3, and 4 of Block 1 of Minor Subdivision No. 494. Located in the NW1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property has historically been utilized for agricultural purposes but has been inactive recently. Existing groundwater in the area is relatively shallow, and the results of ground water monitoring completed in 2023 are included in Appendix C. The existing water infrastructure which surrounds the site is owned and operated by the City of Bozeman. There is an existing 12” water main located within Graf Street with two 8” stubs to the property, an existing 24” water main within South 19th Avenue and a future 8” water main within Arnold Street. b. The proposed water main infrastructure within SRX-II will be deeded to City of Bozeman upon completion and acceptance. The subdivision will also be served by an extension of the City of Bozeman’s sanitary sewer collection system. 2 c. Project Developer: Providence Development, LLC PO Box 4082 Bozeman, MT 59772 System Owner: City of Bozeman PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 3 EXTENT OF WATER WORKS SYSTEM (DEQ 1.1.2): The proposed water main extensions within the property are extensions of the City of Bozeman water infrastructure in the area. The complete buildout of SRX-II will tie into three existing water mains at five locations to create a looped distribution system within the project development. Tie in locations are as follows: · 24” water main within South 19th Avenue o 24” X 8” tapping tee at the proposed intersection of Staudaher. · 12” water main within Graf Street o Existing 8” stub to property at the intersection of South 17th Avenue o Existing 8” stub at the intersection of South 15th Avenue · 8” water main within West Arnold Street (Future phases) o Proposed 8” stub north of the project location at the intersection of South 17th Avenue o Proposed 8” stub north of the project location at the intersection of South 15th Avenue During the development of Block 1 and Block 2, SRX-II will tie into the Graf Street and 19th street water mains creating a loop. The full buildout of SRX-II will include Restricted Lot 1 with connections to the future water main on Arnold Street. Fire protection will be provided by hydrants placed within the development at recommended spacing intervals and supplied by the new 8” mains proposed. This project involves installing 8-inch Class 51 DIP water pipe, new fire hydrants, new fire service lines, and new domestic water services. Services will range in size from 1-inch to 6-inches, depending on projected future building design. See Appendix I for proposed water main layout schematic. The water main extensions will serve Block 1 and Block 2 of the subdivision. Future water main extensions will stub north at the intersections of S 15th Avenue and Staudaher and north of S 17th and Staudaher. 4 ALTERNATE PLANS (1.1.3) No alternate plans were considered. 3 5 SITE CONDITIONS (1.1.4) The SRX-II property is currently undeveloped agricultural land which gently slopes from south to north with existing grades of less than 4% and mostly Meadowcreek loam and Blackmore silt loam, Turner loam, and Enbar-Nythar loam deposits (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey) as shown in Appendix F. A geotechnical report has been completed for SRX-II by Rawhide Engineering Inc dated February 22, 2024 and is included as Appendix G. Seasonally-high groundwater levels onsite range between approximately 1 and 3 feet below existing grade based on well monitoring performed from May 2023 to September 2023. The groundwater flows generally from the south to the north based on generally observed groundwater flows in Bozeman. A corrosivity test was performed for SRX-II using soil samples collected during the geotechnical investigation. The corrosivity soil samples had very similar scores ranging from 25-35, recommending ductile water mains to be wrapped with V-Bio® Enhanced Polyethylene Encasement. 6 WATER USE DATA, INCLUDING (1.1.5): The water distribution system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 1 (DEQ- 1); Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy (and all addenda thereto). The following section addresses the design capacity and flow requirements discussed in Section 8 of DEQ-1. For this report, water demands were calculated and modeled for two different scenarios. The first scenario provides water for Block 1 and Block 2 of the subdivision. The second scenario will provide water throughout the subdivision including Restricted Lot 1. The capacity requirement for the water main extension is calculated as follows: SRX-II is proposed to be zoned REMU with the exception of Block 1 proposed to be zoned B2- M. The Water Facility Plan Update (WFPU) dated July 2017, Table 3.7-Future Infill Zoning District WDFs, states an average day demand for REMU is 873 gpad, and demand from B2-M is 705 gpad. The usage of Block 2 is known and is proposing 341 units. The average daily demand (ADD) can also be calculated using 135 gallons per capita per day at 2.17 people per dwelling unit. Block 2 is proposed to have an ADD of 99,896 gpd across 9.19 acres equating to 10,870 gpad. The expected demand for these water main extensions is in the following paragraphs: Peaking factors were applied to expected average daily demands in accordance with Design Values from City of Bozeman Design Standards, March 2020 Version, including: Maximum Day Demand (MDD) Peaking Factor = 2.3 Maximum Hour (Peak Hour) Demand (PHD) Peaking Factor = 3.0 4 Block 1 (B2-M Zoning Demand) 6.84 acres: ADD = 6.84 acres X 873 gallons per acre per day = 5,971 GPD = 4.15 GPM MDD = 5,971 GPD x 2.3 = 13,733GPD = 9.54 GPM PHD = 5,971 GPD x 3.0 = 17,913GPD = 12.44 GPM Block 2 (341 Units Demand) 9.19 acres: ADD = 341 units x 2.17 people per unit x 135 gallons per capita per day = 99,896 GPD= 69.37 GPM MDD = 99,896 GPD x 2.3 = 229,761GPD = 159.56 GPM PHD = 99,896 GPD x 3.0 = 299,689GPD = 208.12 GPM Restricted Lot (REMU Zoning) 16.38 acres-Future: ADD = 16.38 acres X 873 gallons per acre per day = 14,300 GPD = 9.93 GPM MDD = 14,300 GPD x 2.3 = 32,890GPD = 22.84 GPM PHD = 14,300 GPD x 3.0 = 42,900GPD = 29.79 GPM Table 1 Water demands Block Acres Average Daily Demand for Module (gpd) Maximum Daily Demand for Module (gpm) Peak Hour Demand (gpm) Block 1 6.84 5,971 9.54 12.44 Block 2 9.19 99,896 159.56 208.12 Phase 1 Total 16.03 105,867 169.10 220.56 Restricted Lot 16.38 14,300 22.84 29.79 Full Buildout Total 32.41* 120,167 191.94 250.35 *The total acreage is less than the development site as it does not include the ROW of Staudaher, S 15th Avenue and S 17th Avenue. Fire Flow The total water demand for the system includes the maximum required fire flow of 1,500 GPM plus domestic MDD. Maximum fire flow demands are based on a Type D building of Type V-A Construction and sprinkler systems designed to meet NFPA 13R requirements. Table B105.1(2) of Appendix B of the International Fire Code requires 3,000 GPM fire flow for a building without sprinklers and allows 75% reduction for buildings with fire sprinklers. The reduced flow was calculated to be 750 GPM; however, the minimum flow allowed per code is 1,500 GPM for sprinklers meeting NFPA 13R requirements. For the purpose of this report, our model includes a fire flow demand of 1,500 GPM. The Maximum Daily Demand is calculated by multiplying ADD by a peaking factor of 2.3 as described above. Therefore, the following fire flow demand for the four buildings is as follows: 5 Total Fire Flow = MDD + Fire Flow = 191.94 GPM + 1,500 GPM = 1691.94 GPM 7 FLOW REQUIREMENTS (1.1.6) Modeling Procedure Water modeling was performed using WaterCAD (Connect Edition 10.03.03.72) software to assess expected performance of the proposed water infrastructure network. Water supply from the existing City water system was simulated using reservoirs and pumps at boundary locations. Pump curves were developed using model outputs received from the City of Bozeman at varying flow rates during a maximum daily demand scenario. Using hydraulic model flow data (or fire flow results) represented using a reservoir and pump supply is a commonly used method to build stand-alone models of distribution systems without reproducing the entire distribution system. Flows modeled at Hydrant #2870 (located on Graf Street, near South 17th Ave) was used for calibration and modeling purposes (Appendix D) The minimum residual pressure required at any node in the network is 35 PSI during normal uses (MDD scenario) and 20 PSI during a combined MDD plus fire flow condition. A “C” of 130 was used for the Hazen Williams pipe roughness factor as required by the City of Bozeman Design Standards. 1. Modeling Results-Phase 1 The model’s results indicate that proposed 8-inch distribution mains for SRX-II will supply the required demands for the project during a MDD plus Fire Flow scenario while maintaining pressure above 20-psi at all points within the modeled area. Pressure during the ADD, MDD and PHD scenarios with solely domestic demands ranges from 65 to 71 PSI. It was observed that pressure drops from ADD to PHD were +/- 1 PSI. An automated fire flow analysis was performed to evaluate available supply at all proposed hydrants within the proposed network. This scenario included the MDD scenario in addition to fire flow demands. Based on this analysis, the minimum fire flow available within the network was calculated to be 3,416 GPM at Hydrant H-4. This exceeds the minimum fire flow requirement of 1,692 GPM. 2. Modeling Results-Full Buildout The model’s results indicate that proposed 8-inch distribution mains for SRX-II will supply the required demands for the project during a MDD plus Fire Flow scenario while maintaining pressure above 20-psi at all points within the modeled area. Pressure during the ADD, MDD and PHD scenarios with solely domestic demands ranges from 64 to 70 PSI. It was observed that pressure drops from ADD to PHD were +/- 1 PSI. An automated fire flow analysis was performed to evaluate available supply at all proposed hydrants within the proposed network. This scenario included the MDD scenario in addition to fire flow demands. Based on this analysis, the minimum fire flow available within the network was calculated to be 2,996 GPM at Hydrant H-5. This exceeds the minimum fire flow requirement of 1,692 GPM. 6 8 SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY (1.1.7) Water is supplied from City of Bozeman. 9 PROPOSED TREATMENT PROCESSES (1.1.8) No treatment processes are proposed. 10 SEWAGE SYSTEM AVAILABLE (1.1.9) The area is served by the City of Bozeman wastewater treatment facility. 11 WASTE DISPOSAL (1.1.10) This item is not applicable to the SRX-II project. 12 AUTOMATION (1.1.11) This item is not applicable to the SRX-II project. 13 PROJECT SITES (1.1.12) SRX-II is bounded by Graf Street to the south, Arnold Street to the north, S 15th Avenue to the east and South 19th Avenue to the west. 14 FINANCING (1.1.13) This item is not applicable to the SRX-II project. 15 FUTURE EXTENSIONS (1.1.14) The water main extensions will serve Block 1 and Block 2 of the subdivision. Future water main extensions will stub at the intersections of S 15th Avenue and Staudaher (North) and S 17th and Staudaher (North). A APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP engineerssurveyorsplannersscientists 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 VICINITY MAP SCALE:1" = 2000'19THSAVEW COLLEGE ST 191 PROJECT LOCATION HUFFINE LN W GARFIELD ST W GRAF ST STUCKY RD B APPENDIX B DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MAP (CITY OF BOZEMAN GIS INFRASTRUCTURE VIEWER) 18,0560.6 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Feet 2,1040 Legend 1,052 Location 2,104 12/12/2023 Created By: Created For: Date: South Range Crossing North Mains Active Abandoned Street Names City Limits C APPENDIX C GROUNDWATER MONITORING = Data Input Cell Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW DepthMeasuring DepthGW Depth 5 4981.350 4983.720 4.97 -2.60 5.03 -2.66 5.01 -2.64 5.59 -3.22 6.60 -4.23 6.65 -4.28 6.72 -4.35 7.32 -4.95 7.27 -4.9 6.84 -4.47 6 4988.690 4991.390 5.71 -3.01 5.84 -3.14 5.82 -3.12 5.40 -2.7 5.02 -2.32 5.70 -3 6.03 -3.33 6.89 -4.19 6.91 -4.21 6.32 -3.62 7 4987.860 4989.980 5.07 -2.95 5.21 -3.09 4.82 -2.7 4.90 -2.78 4.20 -2.08 5.00 -2.88 5.60 -3.48 6.12 -4 6.34 -4.22 5.45 -3.33 8 4980.500 4982.060 4.21 -2.65 4.31 -2.75 4.26 -2.7 4.57 -3.01 4.78 -3.22 5.40 -3.84 5.87 -4.31 6.30 -4.74 6.54 -4.98 5.78 -4.22 New 9 4974.717 4979.013 6.84 -2.54 6.90 -2.60 6.45 -2.154 5.95 -1.654 6.10 -1.804 6.80 -2.504 6.69 -2.394 7.52 -3.224 7.37 -3.074 6.78 -2.484 10 4969.270 4972.179 4.85 -1.94 4.87 -1.96 4.87 -1.961 4.60 -1.691 4.73 -1.821 4.45 -1.541 5.20 -2.291 5.79 -2.881 5.51 -2.601 5.28 -2.371 11 4969.810 4971.928 Empty #N/A empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A 12 4962.290 4965.623 4.42 -1.09 4.39 -1.06 4.40 -1.067 4.42 -1.087 4.45 -1.117 4.60 -1.267 4.57 -1.237 4.78 -1.447 4.49 -1.157 4.44 -1.107 13 4961.347 4963.156 3.92 -2.11 4.28 -2.47 3.92 -2.111 3.50 -1.691 3.52 -1.711 4.20 -2.391 6.09 -4.281 6.32 -4.511 6.45 -4.641 6.41 -4.601 14 4969.707 4972.136 4.10 -1.67 4.10 -1.67 4.09 -1.661 4.59 -2.161 5.66 -3.231 4.75 -2.321 6.00 -3.571 6.12 -3.691 6.20 -3.771 4.70 -2.271 15 4971.074 4974.457 5.51 -2.13 5.78 -2.40 5.74 -2.357 5.41 -2.027 5.45 -2.067 5.75 -2.367 6.40 -3.017 6.64 -3.257 6.63 -3.247 6.28 -2.897 16 4976.443 4978.868 4.97 -2.55 5.32 -2.89 4.97 -2.545 4.82 -2.395 4.11 -1.685 4.90 -2.475 5.30 -2.875 5.71 -3.285 5.77 -3.345 5.06 -2.635 New 17 4971.993 4976.132 5.88 -1.74 5.07 -0.93 4.90 -0.761 4.78 -0.641 4.50 -0.361 6.20 -2.061 6.65 -2.511 6.82 -2.681 6.72 -2.581 6.28 -2.141 Date Well #5 Well #6 Well #7 Well #8 Well #9 Well #10 Well #11 Well #12 Well #13 Well #14 Well #15 Well #16 Well #17 5/26/2023 -2.60 -3.01 -2.95 -2.65 -2.54 -1.94 #N/A -1.09 -2.11 -1.67 -2.13 -2.55 -1.74 6/2/2023 -2.66 -3.14 -3.09 -2.75 -2.60 -1.96 #N/A -1.06 -2.47 -1.67 -2.40 -2.89 -0.93 6/9/2023 -2.64 -3.12 -2.70 -2.70 -2.15 -1.96 #N/A -1.07 -2.11 -1.66 -2.36 -2.55 -0.76 6/16/2023 -3.22 -2.70 -2.78 -3.01 -1.65 -1.69 #N/A -1.09 -1.69 -2.16 -2.03 -2.39 -0.64 6/23/2023 -4.23 -2.32 -2.08 -3.22 -1.80 -1.82 #N/A -1.12 -1.71 -3.23 -2.07 -1.68 -0.36 7/7/2023 -4.28 -3.00 -2.88 -3.84 -2.50 -1.54 #N/A -1.27 -2.39 -2.32 -2.37 -2.47 -2.06 7/19/2023 -4.35 -3.33 -3.48 -4.31 -2.39 -2.29 #N/A -1.24 -4.28 -3.57 -3.02 -2.88 -2.51 7/28/2023 -4.95 -4.19 -4.00 -4.74 -3.22 -2.88 #N/A -1.45 -4.51 -3.69 -3.26 -3.28 -2.68 8/11/2023 -4.90 -4.21 -4.22 -4.98 -3.07 -2.60 #N/A -1.16 -4.64 -3.77 -3.25 -3.35 -2.58 9/27/2023 -4.47 -3.62 -3.33 -4.22 -2.48 -2.37 #N/A -1.11 -4.60 -2.27 -2.90 -2.64 -2.14 9/27/20237/28/2023 8/11/2023Well / Date Ground Elevation Measuring Point Elevation 6/9/2023 6/16/2023 7/19/20236/23/2023 7/7/20235/26/2024 6/2/2023 -6.00 -5.00 -4.00 -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 5/14/2023 6/3/2023 6/23/2023 7/13/2023 8/2/2023 8/22/2023 9/11/2023 10/1/2023 10/21/2023 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATERMONITORING DATE 2023 Groundwater Monitoring Well #5 Well #6 Well #7 Well #8 Well #9 Well #10 Well #11 Well #12 Well #13 Well #14 Well #15 Well #16 Well #17 N89°23'18"E 593.92' 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S SS 8S8S8S8S8SSSS S S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S8S8SS 8SS 8S8S8S8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W DYH8WB 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W8W8W8WDYHLOT 1 7.45 acs.S0°36'42"E 91.53'S0°36'42"E 349.46'S14°38'53"E 20.62' S8°31'42"E 71.68' S40°46'21"E 79.35' N89°05'06"E 360.91'R =2 5 5 .0 0 'L =116 .4 3 ' Δ =2 6 °0 9 '3 8 " R =3 4 5 .0 0 ' L =16 2 .19 ' Δ =2 6 °5 6 '0 7 " LOT 1 6.84 acs. 70.00' 70.00'R=180.00'L=149.40'Δ=47°33'14"R=110.00'L=91.30'Δ=47°33'14"N0°42'18"W 70.45'S0°42'18"E 70.55'R=120.00'L=99.40'Δ=47°27'38"R=190.00'L=157.39'Δ=47°27'38"N0°36'42"W 224.93'S0°36'42"E 224.93'S46°5 0'56" W 60.01'L=91.30'L=99.40'L=157.39'N46°50' 56" E 60.01' 659.07' N89°06'04"E 98.48' LOT 2 1.74 acs.S0°35'07"E 259.52'S89°23'11"W 251.12'N0°36'49"W 168.00'S89°23'18"W 114.71' R=345.00' L=162.19' Δ=26°56'07"N0°09'06"W 527.88'60.00'S89°23'18"W 334.10' S89°23'18"W 334.10'S89°23'18"W 365.96' MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2025 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/07/2025 PLOTTED BY: rosie nickelson DRAWING NAME: N:\5659\018 Providence - ZMA Blk 1 MS 494\ACAD\Exhibits\5659.018 Groundwater Monitoring Well Map.dwg 1/4 SEC.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE PROJ. #:SHEET OF COUNTY,DATE: SCALE: CLIENT: FIELD WORK: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:22 GALLATIN 5659.018 1"=70' 12/2023 JW NM MMI 5 EAST 2 SOUTH 24NW MONTANA PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANAengineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net 70 14035700 SCALE IN FEET BASIS OF BEARING Bobcat Coordinate System, NAD83(2011) per the "Rocky Mountain Tribal Coordinate Reference System" Handbook and User Guide, Published September 30th, 2014 and subsequent revisions, established by observations with survey-grade GNSS receivers. ALL LOTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING UTILITY EASEMENTS (EXCEPT THE RESTRICTED LOTS): - 10' ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY - 10' ALONG SIDE LOT LINES - 10' ALONG REAR LOT LINES PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS (P.U.E.) LEGEND SET A REBAR 5/8" DIA.., WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP, "MMI 16411LS". FOUND REBAR AS MARKED MID-SECTION CORNER23 24 FOUND BRASS CAP SECTION CORNER FOUND A.C. PER C.C.R.F. 4-484 25 24 2326 FOUND A.C. ON 5/8 INCH REBAR MARKED MERIDIAN LAND SURVEYING, INC. MEASURED DIMENSION(M) RECORDED DIMENSION PER MINOR SUBDIVISION No. 494(R) ALUMINUM CAPA.C. CERTIFIED CORNER RECORDATION FORMC.C.R.F. BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 ARNOLD STREET STAUDAHER STREET SOUTH 17TH AVENUESOUTH 15TH AVENUESOUTH 19TH AVENUEGRAF STREET PREVIOU S L O T 1 B L O C K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 PREVIOU S L O T 4 B L O C K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 PREVIOU S L O T 3 B L O C K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 PREVIOU S L O T 2 B L O C K 1 MINOR SU B 4 9 4 P R E V I O U S L O T L I N E PREVIOUS LOT LINEPREVIOUS LOT LINEPREVIOUS LOT LINE PREVIOUS LOT LINEPREVIOUS LOT LINE PREVIOUS LOT LINE LOT 1 BL O C K 2 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #16 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #17 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #14 SRX-II SUBDIVISION GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #10 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #13 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #12 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #15 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #9 RESTRICTED LOT 1 D APPENDIX D WATER MODEL CALIBRATION INFO CITY OF BOZEMAN Fire Flow Request Form PHONE (406) 582-3200 FAX (406) 582-3201 Date December 13, 2023 Location West Graf Street and South 19th Avenue Pressure Zone South (HGL 5125) GIS Hydrant ID# 2070, 2870 Adjacent Main Size 24-inch DI, 10-inch DI Model Scenario Maximum Day Demand, Steady State, Fire Flow Reference 2017 Water Facility Plan Update1 Hydrant Curves An Excel Spreadsheet with hydrant curves has been provided for the requested location Requested Location via the Bozeman Infrastructure Viewer2 If you have questions or need further information feel free to email. Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK 1 https://www.bozeman.net/home/showpublisheddocument/4977/636420174896170000 2 https://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=infrastructure GIS Hydrant # Available Flow (gpm) Residual Pressure (psi)2870 0 54.4 200 54.04 400 53.65 600 53.25 800 52.8 1,000.00 52.29 1,200.00 51.7 1,400.00 51.05 1,600.00 50.34 1,800.00 49.57 2,000.00 48.74 2,200.00 47.85 2,400.00 46.9 2,600.00 45.89 2,800.00 44.83 3,000.00 43.72 3,200.00 42.55 3,400.00 41.33 3,600.00 40.05 3,800.00 38.72 4,000.00 37.35 4,200.00 35.91 4,400.00 34.42 4,600.00 32.88 4,800.00 31.28 5,000.00 29.63 5,200.00 27.93 5,400.00 26.18 5,600.00 24.37 5,800.00 22.51 6,000.00 20.61 6,200.00 18.65 6,400.00 16.64 6,600.00 14.58 6,800.00 12.46 7,000.00 10.3 7,200.00 8.09 7,400.00 5.82 7,600.00 3.51 7,800.00 1.15 Hydrant Curve 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000Residual Pressure (psi)Available Flow (gpm) Hydrant Curve 2870 Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. GIS Hydrant # Available Flow (gpm) Residual Pressure (psi)2070 0 56.81 200 56.54 400 56.24 600 55.91 800 55.56 1,000.00 55.18 1,200.00 54.79 1,400.00 54.37 1,600.00 53.93 1,800.00 53.47 2,000.00 52.99 2,200.00 52.49 2,400.00 51.97 2,600.00 51.43 2,800.00 50.86 3,000.00 50.28 3,200.00 49.69 3,400.00 49.07 3,600.00 48.43 3,800.00 47.77 4,000.00 47.08 4,200.00 46.37 4,400.00 45.64 4,600.00 44.88 4,800.00 44.11 5,000.00 43.31 5,200.00 42.49 5,400.00 41.64 5,600.00 40.78 5,800.00 39.9 6,000.00 38.99 6,200.00 38.06 6,400.00 37.1 6,600.00 36.13 6,800.00 35.13 7,000.00 34.11 7,200.00 33.08 7,400.00 32.02 7,600.00 30.94 7,800.00 29.84 8,000.00 28.72 8,200.00 27.58 8,400.00 26.41 8,600.00 25.22 8,800.00 24.02 9,000.00 22.8 9,200.00 21.54 9,400.00 20.26 9,600.00 18.96 9,800.00 17.64 10,000.00 16.29 10,200.00 14.92 10,400.00 13.55 10,600.00 12.15 10,800.00 10.72 11,000.00 9.28 11,200.00 7.81 11,400.00 6.33 11,600.00 4.82 11,800.00 3.3 12,000.00 1.75 12,200.00 0.19 12,223.00 0.01 Hydrant Curve 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000Residual Pressure (psi)Available Flow (gpm) Hydrant Curve 2070 Data Disclaimer: Water distribution information is calculated using hydraulic modeling software and is subject to variation. Actual field conditions may vary. This information is provided to the requestor for evaluation purposes only, without warranty of any kind, including, but not limited to any expressed or implied warranty arising by contract, stature, or law. In no event regardless of cause, shall the City be liable for any direct, indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages of any kind whether such damages arise under contract, tort, strict liability or inequity. E APPENDIX E WATERCAD RESULTS SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Network Schematic SRX N Ph 1 J-11 J-10 J-9 J-8 J-7 J-6 J-5 J-25 J-4 J-3 J-2 J-22 J-21 J-19 J-18 J-30 J-15 J-29 J-14J-13 PMP-1 R-1 H-3 H-2H-1 H-4 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>74 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.99 5,127.08 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 74 127.09 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.08 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.05 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.08 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.05 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.05 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.04 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.06 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>69 5,127.03 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>4 5,127.06 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.08 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 Pressure (psi) 65 66 71 66 75 71 71 71 71 71 71 59 59 66 72 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Hydrant Status Include Hydrant Lateral Loss? Emitter Coefficient (gpm/psi^n) Length (Hydrant Lateral) (ft) Elevation (ft) 30 H-1 Closed False 0.000 20 4,970.55 31 H-2 Closed False 0.000 20 4,975.60 32 H-3 Closed False 0.000 20 4,978.25 33 H-4 Closed False 0.000 20 4,972.06 Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 68 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.05 66 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.07 64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,127.05 67 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Length (Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material 40 P-2 767 J-2 J-3 10.0 Ductile Iron 54 P-9 289 J-2 J-10 8.0 Ductile Iron 62 P-14 24 J-13 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 67 P-3(1)555 J-3 J-15 8.0 Ductile Iron 68 P-3(2)46 J-15 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 76 P-16(1)187 J-14 J-18 8.0 Ductile Iron 77 P-16(2)187 J-18 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 79 P-15(1)196 J-11 J-19 8.0 Ductile Iron 80 P-15(2)196 J-19 J-14 8.0 Ductile Iron 84 P-18 83 J-18 J-21 8.0 Ductile Iron 90 P-22 10 J-13 H-1 6.0 Ductile Iron 92 P-23 10 H-3 J-10 6.0 Ductile Iron 93 P-24 10 H-2 J-14 6.0 Ductile Iron 94 P-25 14 H-4 J-15 6.0 Ductile Iron 97 P-1(1)478 J-9 J-25 10.0 Ductile Iron 98 P-1(2)65 J-25 J-2 10.0 Ductile Iron 103 P-28 128 R-1 PMP-1 10.0 Ductile Iron 104 P-29 85 PMP-1 J-25 10.0 Ductile Iron 124 P-10(1)290 J-10 J-29 8.0 Ductile Iron 125 P-10(2)88 J-29 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 126 P-31 291 J-22 J-29 4.0 Ductile Iron Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 32 0.13 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 20 0.13 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 21 0.13 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 32 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 32 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 37 0.24 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -32 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 37 0.24 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 37 0.24 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 69 0.44 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -21 0.09 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 53 0.21 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.30 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.30 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 20 0.13 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 16 0.10 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -4 0.11 0.000 False 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>169 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.97 5,126.61 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 169 126.64 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.59 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.46 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.58 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.57 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.47 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.47 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.43 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.51 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>160 5,126.38 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>10 5,126.52 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.59 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 Pressure (psi) 65 66 71 65 74 70 70 71 71 71 70 59 59 65 71 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 8 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Hydrant Status Include Hydrant Lateral Loss? Emitter Coefficient (gpm/psi^n) Length (Hydrant Lateral) (ft) Elevation (ft) 30 H-1 Closed False 0.000 20 4,970.55 31 H-2 Closed False 0.000 20 4,975.60 32 H-3 Closed False 0.000 20 4,978.25 33 H-4 Closed False 0.000 20 4,972.06 Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 67 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.47 65 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.57 64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.47 67 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 9 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Length (Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material 40 P-2 767 J-2 J-3 10.0 Ductile Iron 54 P-9 289 J-2 J-10 8.0 Ductile Iron 62 P-14 24 J-13 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 67 P-3(1)555 J-3 J-15 8.0 Ductile Iron 68 P-3(2)46 J-15 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 76 P-16(1)187 J-14 J-18 8.0 Ductile Iron 77 P-16(2)187 J-18 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 79 P-15(1)196 J-11 J-19 8.0 Ductile Iron 80 P-15(2)196 J-19 J-14 8.0 Ductile Iron 84 P-18 83 J-18 J-21 8.0 Ductile Iron 90 P-22 10 J-13 H-1 6.0 Ductile Iron 92 P-23 10 H-3 J-10 6.0 Ductile Iron 93 P-24 10 H-2 J-14 6.0 Ductile Iron 94 P-25 14 H-4 J-15 6.0 Ductile Iron 97 P-1(1)478 J-9 J-25 10.0 Ductile Iron 98 P-1(2)65 J-25 J-2 10.0 Ductile Iron 103 P-28 128 R-1 PMP-1 10.0 Ductile Iron 104 P-29 85 PMP-1 J-25 10.0 Ductile Iron 124 P-10(1)290 J-10 J-29 8.0 Ductile Iron 125 P-10(2)88 J-29 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 126 P-31 291 J-22 J-29 4.0 Ductile Iron Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.30 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 47 0.30 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 48 0.31 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.47 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.47 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 86 0.55 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -74 0.47 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 86 0.55 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 86 0.55 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 160 1.02 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -48 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 121 0.49 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 169 0.69 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 169 0.69 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 47 0.30 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 37 0.24 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -10 0.25 0.000 False 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 10 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 11 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>169 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.97 5,126.61 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 169 126.64 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 12 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.59 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.46 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.58 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.57 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.47 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.47 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.43 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.51 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>160 5,126.38 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>10 5,126.52 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.59 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.55 Pressure (psi) 65 66 71 65 74 70 70 71 71 71 70 59 59 65 71 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 13 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Fire Flow Results Table - Time: 0.00 hours Label Zone Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? Fire Flow Status Fire Flow (Needed) (gpm) Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) H-1 <None>True Passed 1,500 4,081 H-2 <None>True Passed 1,500 3,451 H-3 <None>True Passed 1,500 4,017 H-4 <None>True Passed 1,500 3,416 Flow (Total Needed) (gpm) Flow (Total Available) (gpm) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (Calculated Residual) (psi) Pressure (Zone Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (Calculated Zone Lower Limit) (psi) Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (Zone) 1,500 4,081 20 22 20 20 J-22 1,500 3,451 20 21 20 20 J-21 1,500 4,017 20 20 20 24 J-22 1,500 3,416 20 20 20 21 J-21 Pressure (System Lower Limit)(psi) Pressure (Calculated System Lower Limit) (psi) Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (System) Is Fire Flow Run Balanced? (N/A)20 J-22 True (N/A)20 J-21 True (N/A)24 J-22 True (N/A)21 J-21 True 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 14 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>221 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.95 5,126.32 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 221 126.37 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 15 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.27 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.21 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.07 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.27 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.24 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.21 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.21 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.08 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.08 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.02 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.15 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>208 5,125.94 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>13 5,126.17 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.29 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.21 Pressure (psi) 65 66 70 65 74 70 70 70 70 70 70 59 58 65 71 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 16 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Hydrant Status Include Hydrant Lateral Loss? Emitter Coefficient (gpm/psi^n) Length (Hydrant Lateral) (ft) Elevation (ft) 30 H-1 Closed False 0.000 20 4,970.55 31 H-2 Closed False 0.000 20 4,975.60 32 H-3 Closed False 0.000 20 4,978.25 33 H-4 Closed False 0.000 20 4,972.06 Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.21 67 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.08 65 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.24 64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,126.08 67 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 17 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Length (Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material 40 P-2 767 J-2 J-3 10.0 Ductile Iron 54 P-9 289 J-2 J-10 8.0 Ductile Iron 62 P-14 24 J-13 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 67 P-3(1)555 J-3 J-15 8.0 Ductile Iron 68 P-3(2)46 J-15 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 76 P-16(1)187 J-14 J-18 8.0 Ductile Iron 77 P-16(2)187 J-18 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 79 P-15(1)196 J-11 J-19 8.0 Ductile Iron 80 P-15(2)196 J-19 J-14 8.0 Ductile Iron 84 P-18 83 J-18 J-21 8.0 Ductile Iron 90 P-22 10 J-13 H-1 6.0 Ductile Iron 92 P-23 10 H-3 J-10 6.0 Ductile Iron 93 P-24 10 H-2 J-14 6.0 Ductile Iron 94 P-25 14 H-4 J-15 6.0 Ductile Iron 97 P-1(1)478 J-9 J-25 10.0 Ductile Iron 98 P-1(2)65 J-25 J-2 10.0 Ductile Iron 103 P-28 128 R-1 PMP-1 10.0 Ductile Iron 104 P-29 85 PMP-1 J-25 10.0 Ductile Iron 124 P-10(1)290 J-10 J-29 8.0 Ductile Iron 125 P-10(2)88 J-29 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 126 P-31 291 J-22 J-29 4.0 Ductile Iron Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 96 0.39 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 61 0.39 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 63 0.40 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 96 0.61 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 96 0.61 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 112 0.72 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -96 0.61 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 112 0.72 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 112 0.72 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 208 1.33 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -63 0.26 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 158 0.64 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 221 0.90 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 221 0.90 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 61 0.39 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 49 0.31 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -13 0.32 0.000 False 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 18 of 19 SRX North Blocks 1 and 2 Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 ph 1 WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 19 of 19 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Network Schematic SRX-NORTH J-17 J-16 J-15 J-14J-19J-13 J-25 J-12 J-11 J-29 J-10 J-9 J-27 J-23 J-8 J-22 J-7 J-21 J-6 J-20 J-5 J-28 J-4 J-3 J-18 J-2PMP-1 R-1 H-3 H-2H-1 H-6H-5 H-4 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>83 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.99 5,124.38 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 83 124.40 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.36 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 43 J-5 4,954.10 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 45 J-6 4,952.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 47 J-7 4,957.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 49 J-8 4,967.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.36 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.35 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 57 J-12 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 69 J-16 4,956.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 72 J-17 4,963.64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.32 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 81 J-20 4,989.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>5 5,124.33 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>69 5,124.31 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>4 5,124.34 87 J-23 4,989.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>5 5,124.34 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.36 115 J-27 4,960.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 116 J-28 4,953.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 Pressure (psi) 64 65 70 74 74 72 68 64 73 70 73 69 70 70 73 70 70 70 58 58 58 59 64 71 74 70 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Hydrant Status Include Hydrant Lateral Loss? Emitter Coefficient (gpm/psi^n) Length (Hydrant Lateral) (ft) Elevation (ft) 30 H-1 Closed False 0.000 20 4,970.55 31 H-2 Closed False 0.000 20 4,975.60 32 H-3 Closed False 0.000 20 4,978.25 33 H-4 Closed False 0.000 20 4,972.06 34 H-5 Closed False 0.000 20 4,964.42 35 H-6 Closed False 0.000 20 4,965.33 Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 67 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.35 63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 66 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.34 69 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.33 69 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Length (Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material 40 P-2 767 J-2 J-3 8.0 Ductile Iron 46 P-5 635 J-5 J-6 8.0 Ductile Iron 48 P-6 688 J-6 J-7 8.0 Ductile Iron 50 P-7 617 J-7 J-8 8.0 Ductile Iron 51 P-8 670 J-8 J-9 8.0 Ductile Iron 54 P-9 289 J-2 J-10 8.0 Ductile Iron 58 P-11 333 J-17 J-12 8.0 Ductile Iron 62 P-14 24 J-13 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 67 P-3(1)555 J-3 J-15 8.0 Ductile Iron 68 P-3(2)46 J-15 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 70 P-4(1)396 J-4 J-16 8.0 Ductile Iron 71 P-4(2)221 J-16 J-5 8.0 Ductile Iron 76 P-16(1)187 J-14 J-18 8.0 Ductile Iron 77 P-16(2)187 J-18 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 79 P-15(1)196 J-11 J-19 8.0 Ductile Iron 80 P-15(2)196 J-19 J-14 8.0 Ductile Iron 82 P-17 49 J-19 J-20 8.0 Ductile Iron 84 P-18 83 J-18 J-21 8.0 Ductile Iron 88 P-20 95 J-17 J-23 8.0 Ductile Iron 89 P-21 34 H-5 J-12 6.0 Ductile Iron 90 P-22 10 J-13 H-1 6.0 Ductile Iron 92 P-23 10 H-3 J-10 6.0 Ductile Iron 93 P-24 10 H-2 J-14 6.0 Ductile Iron 94 P-25 14 H-4 J-15 6.0 Ductile Iron 95 P-26 15 H-6 J-16 6.0 Ductile Iron 97 P-1(1)478 J-9 J-25 8.0 Ductile Iron 98 P-1(2)65 J-25 J-2 8.0 Ductile Iron 103 P-28 79 R-1 PMP-1 8.0 Ductile Iron 104 P-29 85 PMP-1 J-25 8.0 Ductile Iron 117 P-12(1)135 J-12 J-28 8.0 Ductile Iron 118 P-12(2)63 J-28 J-6 8.0 Ductile Iron 119 P-30 44 J-28 J-27 8.0 Ductile Iron 124 P-10(1)290 J-10 J-29 8.0 Ductile Iron 125 P-10(2)88 J-29 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 126 P-31 97 J-22 J-29 4.0 Ductile Iron 128 P-32 126 J-17 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 26 0.17 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -14 0.09 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -10 0.06 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -10 0.06 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -25 0.16 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 32 0.21 0.000 False 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 4 0.02 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 15 0.09 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 26 0.17 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 26 0.17 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -14 0.09 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -14 0.09 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 30 0.19 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -40 0.25 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 35 0.22 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 30 0.19 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 5 0.03 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 69 0.44 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 5 0.03 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -25 0.16 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 58 0.37 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 83 0.53 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 83 0.53 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 4 0.02 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 4 0.02 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 32 0.21 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 28 0.18 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -4 0.11 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -8 0.05 0.000 False Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Average Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 8 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>192 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.93 5,124.17 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 192 124.24 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 9 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.07 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.00 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 43 J-5 4,954.10 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.95 45 J-6 4,952.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 47 J-7 4,957.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.99 49 J-8 4,967.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.00 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.06 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.03 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.98 57 J-12 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.98 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.92 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 69 J-16 4,956.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.95 72 J-17 4,963.64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.90 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 81 J-20 4,989.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>11 5,123.94 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>160 5,123.84 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>10 5,123.98 87 J-23 4,989.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>11 5,123.97 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.10 115 J-27 4,960.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 10 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 116 J-28 4,953.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.99 Pressure (psi) 64 65 70 73 74 72 68 64 73 69 73 69 70 69 72 69 69 69 58 58 58 58 64 71 74 70 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 11 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Hydrant Status Include Hydrant Lateral Loss? Emitter Coefficient (gpm/psi^n) Length (Hydrant Lateral) (ft) Elevation (ft) 30 H-1 Closed False 0.000 20 4,970.55 31 H-2 Closed False 0.000 20 4,975.60 32 H-3 Closed False 0.000 20 4,978.25 33 H-4 Closed False 0.000 20 4,972.06 34 H-5 Closed False 0.000 20 4,964.42 35 H-6 Closed False 0.000 20 4,965.33 Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.98 66 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.92 64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.03 63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 66 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 69 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.95 69 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 12 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Length (Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material 40 P-2 767 J-2 J-3 8.0 Ductile Iron 46 P-5 635 J-5 J-6 8.0 Ductile Iron 48 P-6 688 J-6 J-7 8.0 Ductile Iron 50 P-7 617 J-7 J-8 8.0 Ductile Iron 51 P-8 670 J-8 J-9 8.0 Ductile Iron 54 P-9 289 J-2 J-10 8.0 Ductile Iron 58 P-11 333 J-17 J-12 8.0 Ductile Iron 62 P-14 24 J-13 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 67 P-3(1)555 J-3 J-15 8.0 Ductile Iron 68 P-3(2)46 J-15 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 70 P-4(1)396 J-4 J-16 8.0 Ductile Iron 71 P-4(2)221 J-16 J-5 8.0 Ductile Iron 76 P-16(1)187 J-14 J-18 8.0 Ductile Iron 77 P-16(2)187 J-18 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 79 P-15(1)196 J-11 J-19 8.0 Ductile Iron 80 P-15(2)196 J-19 J-14 8.0 Ductile Iron 82 P-17 49 J-19 J-20 8.0 Ductile Iron 84 P-18 83 J-18 J-21 8.0 Ductile Iron 88 P-20 95 J-17 J-23 8.0 Ductile Iron 89 P-21 34 H-5 J-12 6.0 Ductile Iron 90 P-22 10 J-13 H-1 6.0 Ductile Iron 92 P-23 10 H-3 J-10 6.0 Ductile Iron 93 P-24 10 H-2 J-14 6.0 Ductile Iron 94 P-25 14 H-4 J-15 6.0 Ductile Iron 95 P-26 15 H-6 J-16 6.0 Ductile Iron 97 P-1(1)478 J-9 J-25 8.0 Ductile Iron 98 P-1(2)65 J-25 J-2 8.0 Ductile Iron 103 P-28 79 R-1 PMP-1 8.0 Ductile Iron 104 P-29 85 PMP-1 J-25 8.0 Ductile Iron 117 P-12(1)135 J-12 J-28 8.0 Ductile Iron 118 P-12(2)63 J-28 J-6 8.0 Ductile Iron 119 P-30 44 J-28 J-27 8.0 Ductile Iron 124 P-10(1)290 J-10 J-29 8.0 Ductile Iron 125 P-10(2)88 J-29 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 126 P-31 97 J-22 J-29 4.0 Ductile Iron 128 P-32 126 J-17 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 60 0.38 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -31 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -23 0.15 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -23 0.15 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -57 0.37 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.48 0.000 False 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 13 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 8 0.05 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 34 0.22 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 60 0.38 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 60 0.38 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -31 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -31 0.20 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 68 0.43 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -91 0.58 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 80 0.51 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 68 0.43 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 11 0.07 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 160 1.02 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 11 0.07 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -57 0.37 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 134 0.86 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 192 1.23 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 192 1.23 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 8 0.05 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 8 0.05 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 74 0.48 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 65 0.41 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -10 0.24 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -20 0.12 0.000 False Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 14 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Maximum Daily Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 15 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>192 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.93 5,124.17 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 192 124.24 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 16 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.07 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.00 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 43 J-5 4,954.10 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.95 45 J-6 4,952.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 47 J-7 4,957.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.99 49 J-8 4,967.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.00 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.06 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.03 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.98 57 J-12 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.98 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.92 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 69 J-16 4,956.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.95 72 J-17 4,963.64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.90 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.94 81 J-20 4,989.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>11 5,123.94 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>160 5,123.84 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>10 5,123.98 87 J-23 4,989.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>11 5,123.97 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,124.10 115 J-27 4,960.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 17 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 116 J-28 4,953.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.97 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.99 Pressure (psi) 64 65 70 73 74 72 68 64 73 69 73 69 70 69 72 69 69 69 58 58 58 58 64 71 74 70 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 18 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Max Day + Fire Flow Fire Flow Results Table - Time: 0.00 hours Label Zone Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? Fire Flow Status Fire Flow (Needed) (gpm) Fire Flow (Available) (gpm) H-1 <None>True Passed 1,500 3,257 H-2 <None>True Passed 1,500 2,985 H-3 <None>True Passed 1,500 3,389 H-4 <None>True Passed 1,500 3,045 H-5 <None>True Passed 1,500 2,993 H-6 <None>True Passed 1,500 3,016 Flow (Total Needed) (gpm) Flow (Total Available) (gpm) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (Calculated Residual) (psi) Pressure (Zone Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (Calculated Zone Lower Limit) (psi) Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (Zone) 1,500 3,257 20 24 20 20 J-20 1,500 2,985 20 22 20 20 J-21 1,500 3,389 20 20 20 21 J-22 1,500 3,045 20 22 20 20 J-21 1,500 2,993 20 20 20 24 J-23 1,500 3,016 20 20 20 22 J-21 Pressure (System Lower Limit) (psi) Pressure (Calculated System Lower Limit) (psi) Junction w/ Minimum Pressure (System) Is Fire Flow Run Balanced? (N/A)20 J-20 True (N/A)20 J-21 True (N/A)21 J-22 True (N/A)20 J-21 True (N/A)24 J-23 True (N/A)22 J-21 True 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 19 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Reservoir Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 101 R-1 5,000.00 <None>250 5,000.00 Pump Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Pump Definition Status (Initial)Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 102 PMP-1 0.00 Hydrant 2870 On 4,999.89 5,124.01 Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 250 124.13 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 20 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 37 J-2 4,976.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.85 39 J-3 4,973.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.72 41 J-4 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.62 43 J-5 4,954.10 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.65 45 J-6 4,952.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 47 J-7 4,957.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.71 49 J-8 4,967.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.72 52 J-9 4,975.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.82 53 J-10 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.78 55 J-11 4,963.70 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 57 J-12 4,954.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 60 J-13 4,963.80 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 63 J-14 4,963.20 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.60 66 J-15 4,963.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.63 69 J-16 4,956.40 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.64 72 J-17 4,963.64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 75 J-18 4,963.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.56 78 J-19 4,963.60 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.64 81 J-20 4,989.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>15 5,123.64 83 J-21 4,990.70 <None><Collection: 1 item>208 5,123.47 85 J-22 4,991.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>12 5,123.69 87 J-23 4,989.00 <None><Collection: 1 item>15 5,123.69 96 J-25 4,975.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.90 115 J-27 4,960.00 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 21 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Junction Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Elevation (ft) Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 116 J-28 4,953.30 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 123 J-29 4,961.63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.71 Pressure (psi) 64 65 69 73 74 72 68 64 73 69 73 69 69 69 72 69 69 69 58 57 57 58 64 71 74 70 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 22 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Hydrant Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Hydrant Status Include Hydrant Lateral Loss? Emitter Coefficient (gpm/psi^n) Length (Hydrant Lateral) (ft) Elevation (ft) 30 H-1 Closed False 0.000 20 4,970.55 31 H-2 Closed False 0.000 20 4,975.60 32 H-3 Closed False 0.000 20 4,978.25 33 H-4 Closed False 0.000 20 4,972.06 34 H-5 Closed False 0.000 20 4,964.42 35 H-6 Closed False 0.000 20 4,965.33 Zone Demand Collection Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 66 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.60 64 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.78 63 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.63 66 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.69 69 <None><Collection: 0 items>0 5,123.64 68 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 23 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours ID Label Length (Scaled) (ft) Start Node Stop Node Diameter (in) Material 40 P-2 767 J-2 J-3 8.0 Ductile Iron 46 P-5 635 J-5 J-6 8.0 Ductile Iron 48 P-6 688 J-6 J-7 8.0 Ductile Iron 50 P-7 617 J-7 J-8 8.0 Ductile Iron 51 P-8 670 J-8 J-9 8.0 Ductile Iron 54 P-9 289 J-2 J-10 8.0 Ductile Iron 58 P-11 333 J-17 J-12 8.0 Ductile Iron 62 P-14 24 J-13 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 67 P-3(1)555 J-3 J-15 8.0 Ductile Iron 68 P-3(2)46 J-15 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 70 P-4(1)396 J-4 J-16 8.0 Ductile Iron 71 P-4(2)221 J-16 J-5 8.0 Ductile Iron 76 P-16(1)187 J-14 J-18 8.0 Ductile Iron 77 P-16(2)187 J-18 J-4 8.0 Ductile Iron 79 P-15(1)196 J-11 J-19 8.0 Ductile Iron 80 P-15(2)196 J-19 J-14 8.0 Ductile Iron 82 P-17 49 J-19 J-20 8.0 Ductile Iron 84 P-18 83 J-18 J-21 8.0 Ductile Iron 88 P-20 95 J-17 J-23 8.0 Ductile Iron 89 P-21 34 H-5 J-12 6.0 Ductile Iron 90 P-22 10 J-13 H-1 6.0 Ductile Iron 92 P-23 10 H-3 J-10 6.0 Ductile Iron 93 P-24 10 H-2 J-14 6.0 Ductile Iron 94 P-25 14 H-4 J-15 6.0 Ductile Iron 95 P-26 15 H-6 J-16 6.0 Ductile Iron 97 P-1(1)478 J-9 J-25 8.0 Ductile Iron 98 P-1(2)65 J-25 J-2 8.0 Ductile Iron 103 P-28 79 R-1 PMP-1 8.0 Ductile Iron 104 P-29 85 PMP-1 J-25 8.0 Ductile Iron 117 P-12(1)135 J-12 J-28 8.0 Ductile Iron 118 P-12(2)63 J-28 J-6 8.0 Ductile Iron 119 P-30 44 J-28 J-27 8.0 Ductile Iron 124 P-10(1)290 J-10 J-29 8.0 Ductile Iron 125 P-10(2)88 J-29 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron 126 P-31 97 J-22 J-29 4.0 Ductile Iron 128 P-32 126 J-17 J-11 8.0 Ductile Iron Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 78 0.50 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -41 0.26 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -30 0.19 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -30 0.19 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -75 0.48 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 97 0.62 0.000 False 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 24 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Hazen- Williams C Has Check Valve? Minor Loss Coefficient (Local) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Has User Defined Length? 130.0 False 0.000 11 0.07 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 45 0.28 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 78 0.50 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 78 0.50 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -41 0.26 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -41 0.26 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 89 0.57 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -119 0.76 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 104 0.66 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 89 0.57 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 15 0.10 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 208 1.33 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 15 0.09 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -75 0.48 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 175 1.12 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 250 1.60 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 250 1.60 0.001 False 130.0 False 0.000 11 0.07 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 11 0.07 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 97 0.62 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 85 0.54 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -12 0.32 0.000 False 130.0 False 0.000 -25 0.16 0.000 False Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 25 of 26 SRX North (Full Buildout) Water Model Report Peak Hour Demand Scenario Pipe Table - Time: 0.00 hours Length (User Defined) (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5659.021 Full Buildout WaterCAD Modeling.wtg Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center WaterCAD [23.00.00.19] 11/1/2024 76 Watertown Road, Suite 2D Thomaston, CT 06787 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 26 of 26 F APPENDIX F NRCS SOILS REPORT United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallatin County Area, Montana NSRX Natural Resources Conservation Service December 11, 2023 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Gallatin County Area, Montana.......................................................................13 350B—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................13 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes.......................14 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................15 512B—Enbar-Nythar loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes.....................................17 References............................................................................................................19 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 50550805055150505522050552905055360505543050555005055080505515050552205055290505536050554305055500494980 495050 495120 495190 495260 495330 495400 495470 495540 495610 495680 494980 495050 495120 495190 495260 495330 495400 495470 495540 495610 495680 45° 39' 11'' N 111° 3' 52'' W45° 39' 11'' N111° 3' 19'' W45° 38' 56'' N 111° 3' 52'' W45° 38' 56'' N 111° 3' 19'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 45 90 180 270 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,260 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 27, Aug 25, 2023 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 18, 2022—Aug 29, 2022 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 350B Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 0.7 1.9% 457A Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes 3.2 8.4% 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 31.7 83.9% 512B Enbar-Nythar loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes 2.2 5.8% Totals for Area of Interest 37.8 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. Custom Soil Resource Report 11 The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Gallatin County Area, Montana 350B—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56q7 Elevation: 4,850 to 5,550 feet Mean annual precipitation: 18 to 22 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 43 degrees F Frost-free period: 80 to 95 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Blackmore and similar soils:90 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Blackmore Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Calcareous loess Typical profile A - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam Bt - 10 to 27 inches: silty clay loam Bk1 - 27 to 42 inches: silt loam Bk2 - 42 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 11.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R043BP818MT - Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Bowery Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Blackmore Percent of map unit:3 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R043BP820MT - Upland Shrubland Group Hydric soil rating: No Brodyk Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB030MT - Limy (Ly) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56tb Elevation: 4,300 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Turner and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Turner Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt - 6 to 12 inches: clay loam Bk - 12 to 26 inches: clay loam 2C - 26 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:15 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Beaverton Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP818MT - Upland Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Meadowcreek Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Turner Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vt Elevation: 4,200 to 5,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Custom Soil Resource Report 15 Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Meadowcreek and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Meadowcreek Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 11 inches: loam Bg - 11 to 25 inches: silt loam 2C - 25 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Blossberg Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: Yes Beaverton Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP818MT - Upland Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 16 512B—Enbar-Nythar loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vw Elevation: 4,300 to 6,100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Enbar and similar soils:60 percent Nythar and similar soils:30 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Enbar Setting Landform:Flood plains Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 22 inches: loam Cg - 22 to 49 inches: sandy loam 2C - 49 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding:Rare Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:10 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 17 Description of Nythar Setting Landform:Flood plains Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: loam Bg - 8 to 33 inches: silt loam Cg - 33 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding:Rare Frequency of ponding:None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 5w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Ecological site: R043BP801MT - Bottomland Group Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Straw Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Blossberg Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Flood plains Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 18 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 19 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 20 G APPENDIX G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT H APPENDIX H CORROSIVITY ANALYSIS South Range Crossing North Dipra Corrosivity Likelihood Score Sheet (ohm-cm)(points)(ppm)(points)(%)(points)(yes/no)(points)(s.u.)(points)(ppm)(points)(mv)(points)Yes/No (points) TP-1 1740 19 19 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.7 0 36 4 303 0 Yes 2 35 TP-2 1870 19 23 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.6 0 30 4 292 0 Yes 2 35 TP-4 1570 19 20 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.8 0 42 4 295 0 Yes 2 35 TP-6 2250 10 16 0 >15 5 yes 5 7.8 0 23 4 294 0 Yes 2 26 Total PointsSample Bi-Metallic ConsiderationsRedox PotentialSulfide IonsPHGround Water InfluenceMoisture ContentChloridesResistivity N:\5659\021 - SWX North Pre-Plat\04 Design\Calcs\Corrosivity\5659.021_South Range_CorrosivityScoreSheets.xlsx 1 of 2 South Range Crossing North Dipra Consequence Score Sheet (in)(points)Classification (points)(ft)(points)(yes/no)(points) Onsite <24 0 Routine 0 <10 0 Yes 0 0 Total PointsLocation Pipe Diameter Location Depth of Cover Alternate Water Supply N:\5659\021 - SWX North Pre-Plat\04 Design\Calcs\Corrosivity\5659.021_South Range_CorrosivityScoreSheets.xlsx 2 of 2 5 < 500 ohm-cm 30 500 - 1000 ohm-cm 25 > 1000 - 1500 ohm-cm 22 > 1500 - 2000 ohm-cm 19 > 2000 - 3000 ohm-cm 10 > 3000 - 5000 ohm-cm 5 > 5000 ohm-cm 0 > 100 ppm = positive 8 50 - 100 ppm = trace 3 < 50 ppm = negative 0 > 15% = Wet 5 5 - 15% = Moist 2.5 < 5% = Dry 0 Pipe below the water 5 table at any time pH 0 - 4 4 pH > 4 - 6 1 pH 6 - 8, with sulfides and low or negative redox 4 pH > 6 0 positive ( 1 ppm)4 trace ( > 0 and < 1 ppm) 1.5 negative ( 0 ppm) 0 = negative 2 = positive 0 - 100 mv 1 = positive > 100 mv 0 Connected to noble metals 2 (e.g. copper) - yes Connected to noble metals 0 (e.g. copper) - no TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS Cinders, Mine Waste, Peat Bog, Landfill, Fly Ash, Coal RESISTIVITY CHLORIDES MOISTURE CONTENT GROUND WATER INFLUENCE pH SULFIDE IONS REDOX POTENTIAL BI-METALLIC CONSIDERATIONS Known Corrosive Environments POINTS 30 8 5 5 4 4 2 2 60 21 * Soils with Known Corrosive Environments shall be assigned 21 points or the total of points for Likelihood Factors, whichever is greater. Likelihood Score Sheet TABLE 2 – > – > MAXIMUM POSSIBLE POINTS LIKELIHOOD FACTOR 6 DIPRA and Corrpro again listened to the needs of utility operators and recognized the differences between long, large diameter, straight-run transmission mains and the more complicated networks of distribution pipelines that bring water to our neighborhoods and businesses. The result provides a more practical solution for pipeline networks that comprise the distribution systems within a utility’s service area. The use of V-Bio® enhanced polyethylene encasement in conjunction with metallized zinc provides water operators with an effective alternative to controlling corrosion in distribution systems. 3” to 24” 0 30” to 36” 8 42” to 48” 12 54” to 64” 22 Routine (Fair to good access, minimal traffic/other utility 0 consideration, etc.) Moderate (Typical business/ residential areas, some right 8 of way limitations, etc.) Difficult (Subaqueous crossings, downtown metropolitan business areas, 20 multiple utilities congestion, swamps, etc.) 0 to 10 feet depth 0 > 10 to 20 feet depth 3 > 20 feet depth 5 Alternate supply available - no 3 Alternate supply available - yes 0 TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS PIPE SERVICE LOCATION: Construction-Repair Considerations DEPTH OF COVER CONSIDERATIONS ALTERNATE WATER SUPPLY POINTS 22 20 5 3 50 Consequence Score Sheet TABLE 3 The revised DDM® recognizes the practical differences in corrosion control needs between transmission mains and distribution systems. MAXIMUM POSSIBLE POINTS CONSEQUENCE FACTOR I APPENDIX I WATER AND SEWER LAYOUT 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 24W24W24W24W24W8W8W8WDYH DYHDYH DYH DYHDYH 8W8W8WDYH 18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S10S 10S 8S8SS S S S S S S S S S S S 8S8S8SS S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10SSS S S S SS S S S FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by rosie nickelson on Feb/24/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N:\5659\021 - SWX North Pre-Plat\ACAD\Exhibits\5659.021_Water & Sewer Layout.dwg 5659.021 EX. 1 TJW BOZEMAN MONTANA WATER AND SEWER LAYOUT CMS SRX-II SUBDIVISION CMS 02/2025 100 2000 SCALE IN FEET STAUDAHER STREET SOUTH 15TH AVENUESOUTH 19TH AVENUESOUTH 17TH AVENUEWEST GRAF STREET ARNOLD STREET LEGEND 18S 8S 24W 10W 8W 8W 10S PROPOSED 8" WATER PROPOSED 8" SEWER EXISTING 24" WATER EXISTING 10" WATER EXISTING 8" WATER EXISTING 18" SEWER EXISTING 10" SEWER FUTURE 8" WATER BLOCK 2BLOCK 1 LOT 1 RESTRICTED LOT 1 LOT 1 LOT 2 FUTURE 8" SEWER 10S PROPOSED 10" SEWER