Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
018 - Appendix P - Wastewater Design Report
SRX-II SUBDIVISION SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT February 2025 PREPARED BY: MMI #: 5659.021 N:\5659\021 - SWX North Pre-Plat\04 Design\Reports\Wastewater\5659.021_WastewaterDesignReport.docx Table of Contents 1 PROBLEM DEFINED (DEQ 11.11) ...................................................................................................... 1 2 DESIGN CONDITIONS (DEQ 11.12) ................................................................................................... 1 3 IMPACT ON EXISTING WASTEWATER FACILITIES (11.13) ............................................................ 3 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (11.14) ....................................................................................................... 3 5 DRAWINGS (11.15) .............................................................................................................................. 3 6 DESIGN CRITERIA (11.16) .................................................................................................................. 3 7 SITE INFORMATION (11.17) ............................................................................................................... 3 8 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION/ANALYSIS (11.18) ................................................................................ 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (11.19) ................................................................................................. 4 APPENDICES Appendix A Vicinity Map Appendix B Collection System Map (City of Bozeman GIS Infrastructure Viewer) Appendix C NRCS Soils Report Appendix D Water and Sewer Layout Appendix E Groundwater Monitoring Data Appendix F Email Correspondence (COB) Written By: RSN Checked By: CMS Approved By: BJH Project No.: 5659.021 1 SRX-II Subdivision Wastewater System Design Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed SRX-II Subdivision encompasses a total of 35.06 acres and is generally located at the northeast corner of West Graf Street and South 19th Avenue. The property is within the boundaries of the City of Bozeman, Montana and was annexed in August of 2006. The development is zoned REMU and B2-M. The following is the legal description for the property: Being Lots 1,2,3, and 4 of Block 1 of Minor Subdivision No. 494. Located in the NW1/4 of Section 24, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property has historically been utilized for agricultural purposes. The southern portion of the property was farmed in 2023, with the northern portion left as native grass. Existing groundwater in the area is relatively shallow, and the results of ground water monitoring completed in 2023 are included in Appendix E. This design report provides a basis of design for the sewer collection system for SRX-II. The sewer collection system will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 2; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); The City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy March of 2004, and all Addenda; and the City of Bozeman Wastewater Facility Plan. The following design report follows the section numbering of the Circular DEQ-2 Standards for Public Sewage Systems, 2018. 1 PROBLEM DEFINED (DEQ 11.11) The purpose of this design report is to quantify the anticipated sewer flows from SRX-II and provide preliminary sizing for the proposed sewer infrastructure. Sewer collection for the project will consist of sewer mains located in the rights-of-way and individual services provided to each property or building location (if known). SRX-II is proposed to be phased in two phases. The first phase will be the south half of the property from Staudaher to Graf Street and second phase will be the remaining north half of the property. The flows from SRX-II Phase 1 will generally flow to the north to an 8-inch main along Staudaher and convey west to S 19th Avenue connecting to an 18-inch main. The flows from SRX-II Phase 2 will flow north connecting to a proposed 8-inch sewer main along Arnold St (designed by others) adjacent to the north property boundary. Additionally, the sewer main along 15th will be built in Phases to accommodate the Jarret Subdivision south of Graf Street. 2 DESIGN CONDITIONS (DEQ 11.12) SRX-II consists of 35.06 acres. Block 1 is zoned B2-M, while the remaining property is zoned REMU. Design flowrates for this development are based on the 2015 City of Bozeman Wastewater Facility Plan. Based on Table 2-13 of that document, the REMU zoned parcels are 2 designated an average daily demand (ADD) of 1,456 gpad and B2-M zoning parcels have an ADD of 2,000 gpad. Block 2 has a proposed site plan that encompasses 341 residential dwelling units. This flowrate can be calculated using an average daily domestic flow rate of 64.4 gallons per capita per day at 2.17 people per dwelling unit. The ADD for Block 2 is calculated to 47,654 gpd over 9.19 acres equating to 5,185 gpad. This ADD is significantly larger than the REMU zoning, and will be used for Block 2. Additionally, the neighboring subdivision, Jarret Subdivision, zoned R-2 can expect to discharge 8 acres of sewer flow into the main along S 15th Avenue. The 2015 City of Bozeman Wastewater Facility, Table 2-13, designates R-2 zoning to have an ADD of 728 gallons per acre per day. The peak hour factor was calculated based on the City Design Standards and Specification Policy. The final addition to projected wastewater generation is infiltration/inflow (I/I) which is 150 gpd/acre per the City Design Standards and Specifications Policy (Section V.B.4 - Page 48). The anticipated sewer flows are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 – SRX-II Sewer Demands Block Area (Acres) Average Demand (gal/acre/day) Average Demand (gpd) Average Demand (gpm) Infiltration (gpm) Total Average Daily Flow (gpm) Equivalent Population Peaking Factor Peak Hour Flow (gpm) Block 1 6.84 2,000 13,680 9.5 0.71 10.21 -- -- -- Block 2 9.19 5,185 47,654 33.09 0.96 34.05 -- -- -- Phase 1 Total 35.06 -- 61,334 42.59 1.67 34.26 952 1.40 61.30 Restricted Lot 16.38 1,456 23,849 16.56 1.71 18.27 370 1.60 28.25 Project Total 32.41* - 85,183 59.15 3.38 62.53 1,322 1.35 81.56 Jarret Subdivision ~8.0 728 5,824 4.04 0.83 4.087 90 2.04 9.07 * The total acreage is less than the development site at it does not include the ROW of Staudaher, S 15th Ave, and S 17th Ave. The capacity of an 8-inch sewer main at 0.40% slope flowing 75% full is estimated to be about 313 gpm. Therefore, there is adequate capacity in the proposed sewer main along 15th Avenue. Due to existing elevations, of the 18” main along S 19th Avenue and the stub located at Graf St and S 15th Ave, an 8-inch sewer couldn’t be installed throughout the entire length of Staudaher and S 15th maintaining the minimum 0.40% slope. To connect to the Jarret Subdivision south of Graf St, the City of Bozeman agreed through email correspondence on November 7th, 2024 (Appendix F) that a 10-inch sewer main may be installed in Staudaher, and an 8-inch sewer main in 15th Ave. The capacity of a 10-inch sewer main at 0.28% slope flowing 75% full is estimated to be about 474 gpm, and can still accommodate the proposed flows of 90.63 gpm. 3 3 IMPACT ON EXISTING WASTEWATER FACILITIES (11.13) The property is within the wastewater planning boundary for the City of Bozeman as described in the 2015 City of Bozeman Wastewater Collection System Facilities Plan. The proposed development will discharge into the 18” existing sewer main along South 19th Avenue. This sewer infrastructure can handle the increase in flows based on information in the 2015 City of Bozeman Wastewater Collection Facilities Plan Update. The 2015 Wastewater Facility Plan identified a number of long-term pipe upgrades downstream of this development. All the pipes that require long term upgrades have adequate capacity for this development. The pipe section identified as the most limiting is the WWTP Interceptor which had an available capacity of 2,280gpm based on the 2015 plan. A current distribution map is provided as Appendix B. 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (11.14) The purpose of this design report is to quantify the anticipated sewer flows from SRX-II and provide calculations supporting the sizing for the proposed wastewater infrastructure to serve the project. 5 DRAWINGS (11.15) Drawings identifying the site of the project, including the location and size of proposed facilities are included in this submittal (see preliminary plat for details). 6 DESIGN CRITERIA (11.16) Design criteria including average and peak flows were provided in previous sections. The proposed sewer mains will conform to the State’s minimum vertical and horizontal separation criteria from water mains. The sewer collection system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Circular No. 2 (DEQ-2); Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy (and all addenda thereto). Sewer manholes shall be standard concrete manholes spaced no more than 400 feet apart and all sewer mains shall be SDR-35 PVC. 7 SITE INFORMATION (11.17) SRX-II is bounded by West Graf Street to the south, Arnold Street to the north, Allison Subdivision Phase 4A to the east, and South 19th Avenue to the west. The proposed development is currently undeveloped agricultural land which slopes gently to the north with existing grades of less than 4% and mostly Meadowcreek loam with Blackmore silt loam, Tumer loam, and Enbar-Nythar loam deposits (USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey). See the soils report located in Appendix C for details. 8 ALTERNATIVE SELECTION/ANALYSIS (11.18) No proposed alternatives were considered. 4 9 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (11.19) There are no expected environmental impacts from this sewer main extension, as the City of Bozeman Wastewater Treatment Plant has more than adequate capacity for this extension. A APPENDIX A VICINITY MAP engineerssurveyorsplannersscientists 2880 Technology Boulevard West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 922-6702 VICINITY MAP SCALE:1" = 2000'19THSAVEW COLLEGE ST 191 PROJECT LOCATION HUFFINE LN W GARFIELD ST W GRAF ST STUCKY RD B APPENDIX B COLLECTION SYSTEM MAP (City of Bozeman GIS Infrastructure Viewer) 36,1121.1 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Miles 10 Legend 0 Location 1 12/12/2023 Created By: Created For: Date: South Range Crossing North Abandoned Mains Force Mains Gravity Mains Street Names (Major) City Limits Project Location SRX-II SUBDIVISION C APPENDIX C NRCS SOILS REPORT United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Gallatin County Area, Montana NSRX Natural Resources Conservation Service December 11, 2023 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 Soil Map..................................................................................................................8 Soil Map................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 Map Unit Legend................................................................................................11 Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Gallatin County Area, Montana.......................................................................13 350B—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................13 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes.......................14 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes......................................15 512B—Enbar-Nythar loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes.....................................17 References............................................................................................................19 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report 6 identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Custom Soil Resource Report 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 50550805055150505522050552905055360505543050555005055080505515050552205055290505536050554305055500494980 495050 495120 495190 495260 495330 495400 495470 495540 495610 495680 494980 495050 495120 495190 495260 495330 495400 495470 495540 495610 495680 45° 39' 11'' N 111° 3' 52'' W45° 39' 11'' N111° 3' 19'' W45° 38' 56'' N 111° 3' 52'' W45° 38' 56'' N 111° 3' 19'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 12N WGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 45 90 180 270 Meters Map Scale: 1:3,260 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 27, Aug 25, 2023 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 18, 2022—Aug 29, 2022 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 350B Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 0.7 1.9% 457A Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes 3.2 8.4% 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes 31.7 83.9% 512B Enbar-Nythar loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes 2.2 5.8% Totals for Area of Interest 37.8 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. Custom Soil Resource Report 11 The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Gallatin County Area, Montana 350B—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56q7 Elevation: 4,850 to 5,550 feet Mean annual precipitation: 18 to 22 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 43 degrees F Frost-free period: 80 to 95 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Blackmore and similar soils:90 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Blackmore Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Calcareous loess Typical profile A - 0 to 10 inches: silt loam Bt - 10 to 27 inches: silty clay loam Bk1 - 27 to 42 inches: silt loam Bk2 - 42 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:30 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 11.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R043BP818MT - Upland Grassland Group Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Bowery Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Custom Soil Resource Report 13 Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Blackmore Percent of map unit:3 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R043BP820MT - Upland Shrubland Group Hydric soil rating: No Brodyk Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB030MT - Limy (Ly) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No 457A—Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56tb Elevation: 4,300 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Turner and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Turner Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt - 6 to 12 inches: clay loam Bk - 12 to 26 inches: clay loam 2C - 26 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Custom Soil Resource Report 14 Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 48 to 96 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:15 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Beaverton Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP818MT - Upland Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Meadowcreek Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Turner Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No 510B—Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vt Elevation: 4,200 to 5,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Custom Soil Resource Report 15 Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Meadowcreek and similar soils:85 percent Minor components:15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Meadowcreek Setting Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 11 inches: loam Bg - 11 to 25 inches: silt loam 2C - 25 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Blossberg Percent of map unit:10 percent Landform:Terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: Yes Beaverton Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP818MT - Upland Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 16 512B—Enbar-Nythar loams, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 56vw Elevation: 4,300 to 6,100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Map Unit Composition Enbar and similar soils:60 percent Nythar and similar soils:30 percent Minor components:10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Enbar Setting Landform:Flood plains Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 22 inches: loam Cg - 22 to 49 inches: sandy loam 2C - 49 to 60 inches: very gravelly loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding:Rare Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:10 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 17 Description of Nythar Setting Landform:Flood plains Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Loamy alluvium Typical profile A - 0 to 8 inches: loam Bg - 8 to 33 inches: silt loam Cg - 33 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding:Rare Frequency of ponding:None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 5w Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Ecological site: R043BP801MT - Bottomland Group Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Straw Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Stream terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BB032MT - Loamy (Lo) LRU 01 Subset B Hydric soil rating: No Blossberg Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Flood plains Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Ecological site:R044BP815MT - Subirrigated Grassland Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 18 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 19 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 20 D APPENDIX D WATER AND SEWER LAYOUT 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 24W24W24W24W24W8W8W8WDYH DYHDYH DYH DYHDYH 8W8W8WDYH 18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S18S10S 10S 8S8SS S S S S S S S S S S S 8S8S8SS S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10S 10SSS S S S SS S S S FIGURE NUMBER © PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE,2025 Plotted by rosie nickelson on Feb/24/2025 engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net N:\5659\021 - SWX North Pre-Plat\ACAD\Exhibits\5659.021_Water & Sewer Layout.dwg 5659.021 EX. 1 TJW BOZEMAN MONTANA WATER AND SEWER LAYOUT CMS SRX-II SUBDIVISION CMS 02/2025 100 2000 SCALE IN FEET STAUDAHER STREET SOUTH 15TH AVENUESOUTH 19TH AVENUESOUTH 17TH AVENUEWEST GRAF STREET ARNOLD STREET LEGEND 18S 8S 24W 10W 8W 8W 10S PROPOSED 8" WATER PROPOSED 8" SEWER EXISTING 24" WATER EXISTING 10" WATER EXISTING 8" WATER EXISTING 18" SEWER EXISTING 10" SEWER FUTURE 8" WATER BLOCK 2BLOCK 1 LOT 1 RESTRICTED LOT 1 LOT 1 LOT 2 FUTURE 8" SEWER 10S PROPOSED 10" SEWER E APPENDIX E GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA = Data Input Cell Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW Depth Measuring Depth GW DepthMeasuring DepthGW Depth 5 4981.350 4983.720 4.97 -2.60 5.03 -2.66 5.01 -2.64 5.59 -3.22 6.60 -4.23 6.65 -4.28 6.72 -4.35 7.32 -4.95 7.27 -4.9 6.84 -4.47 6 4988.690 4991.390 5.71 -3.01 5.84 -3.14 5.82 -3.12 5.40 -2.7 5.02 -2.32 5.70 -3 6.03 -3.33 6.89 -4.19 6.91 -4.21 6.32 -3.62 7 4987.860 4989.980 5.07 -2.95 5.21 -3.09 4.82 -2.7 4.90 -2.78 4.20 -2.08 5.00 -2.88 5.60 -3.48 6.12 -4 6.34 -4.22 5.45 -3.33 8 4980.500 4982.060 4.21 -2.65 4.31 -2.75 4.26 -2.7 4.57 -3.01 4.78 -3.22 5.40 -3.84 5.87 -4.31 6.30 -4.74 6.54 -4.98 5.78 -4.22 New 9 4974.717 4979.013 6.84 -2.54 6.90 -2.60 6.45 -2.154 5.95 -1.654 6.10 -1.804 6.80 -2.504 6.69 -2.394 7.52 -3.224 7.37 -3.074 6.78 -2.484 10 4969.270 4972.179 4.85 -1.94 4.87 -1.96 4.87 -1.961 4.60 -1.691 4.73 -1.821 4.45 -1.541 5.20 -2.291 5.79 -2.881 5.51 -2.601 5.28 -2.371 11 4969.810 4971.928 Empty #N/A empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A Empty #N/A 12 4962.290 4965.623 4.42 -1.09 4.39 -1.06 4.40 -1.067 4.42 -1.087 4.45 -1.117 4.60 -1.267 4.57 -1.237 4.78 -1.447 4.49 -1.157 4.44 -1.107 13 4961.347 4963.156 3.92 -2.11 4.28 -2.47 3.92 -2.111 3.50 -1.691 3.52 -1.711 4.20 -2.391 6.09 -4.281 6.32 -4.511 6.45 -4.641 6.41 -4.601 14 4969.707 4972.136 4.10 -1.67 4.10 -1.67 4.09 -1.661 4.59 -2.161 5.66 -3.231 4.75 -2.321 6.00 -3.571 6.12 -3.691 6.20 -3.771 4.70 -2.271 15 4971.074 4974.457 5.51 -2.13 5.78 -2.40 5.74 -2.357 5.41 -2.027 5.45 -2.067 5.75 -2.367 6.40 -3.017 6.64 -3.257 6.63 -3.247 6.28 -2.897 16 4976.443 4978.868 4.97 -2.55 5.32 -2.89 4.97 -2.545 4.82 -2.395 4.11 -1.685 4.90 -2.475 5.30 -2.875 5.71 -3.285 5.77 -3.345 5.06 -2.635 New 17 4971.993 4976.132 5.88 -1.74 5.07 -0.93 4.90 -0.761 4.78 -0.641 4.50 -0.361 6.20 -2.061 6.65 -2.511 6.82 -2.681 6.72 -2.581 6.28 -2.141 Date Well #5 Well #6 Well #7 Well #8 Well #9 Well #10 Well #11 Well #12 Well #13 Well #14 Well #15 Well #16 Well #17 5/26/2023 -2.60 -3.01 -2.95 -2.65 -2.54 -1.94 #N/A -1.09 -2.11 -1.67 -2.13 -2.55 -1.74 6/2/2023 -2.66 -3.14 -3.09 -2.75 -2.60 -1.96 #N/A -1.06 -2.47 -1.67 -2.40 -2.89 -0.93 6/9/2023 -2.64 -3.12 -2.70 -2.70 -2.15 -1.96 #N/A -1.07 -2.11 -1.66 -2.36 -2.55 -0.76 6/16/2023 -3.22 -2.70 -2.78 -3.01 -1.65 -1.69 #N/A -1.09 -1.69 -2.16 -2.03 -2.39 -0.64 6/23/2023 -4.23 -2.32 -2.08 -3.22 -1.80 -1.82 #N/A -1.12 -1.71 -3.23 -2.07 -1.68 -0.36 7/7/2023 -4.28 -3.00 -2.88 -3.84 -2.50 -1.54 #N/A -1.27 -2.39 -2.32 -2.37 -2.47 -2.06 7/19/2023 -4.35 -3.33 -3.48 -4.31 -2.39 -2.29 #N/A -1.24 -4.28 -3.57 -3.02 -2.88 -2.51 7/28/2023 -4.95 -4.19 -4.00 -4.74 -3.22 -2.88 #N/A -1.45 -4.51 -3.69 -3.26 -3.28 -2.68 8/11/2023 -4.90 -4.21 -4.22 -4.98 -3.07 -2.60 #N/A -1.16 -4.64 -3.77 -3.25 -3.35 -2.58 9/27/2023 -4.47 -3.62 -3.33 -4.22 -2.48 -2.37 #N/A -1.11 -4.60 -2.27 -2.90 -2.64 -2.14 9/27/20237/28/2023 8/11/2023Well / Date Ground Elevation Measuring Point Elevation 6/9/2023 6/16/2023 7/19/20236/23/2023 7/7/20235/26/2024 6/2/2023 -6.00 -5.00 -4.00 -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 5/14/2023 6/3/2023 6/23/2023 7/13/2023 8/2/2023 8/22/2023 9/11/2023 10/1/2023 10/21/2023 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATERMONITORING DATE 2023 Groundwater Monitoring Well #5 Well #6 Well #7 Well #8 Well #9 Well #10 Well #11 Well #12 Well #13 Well #14 Well #15 Well #16 Well #17 N89°23'18"E 593.92' 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S SS 8S8S8S8S8SSSS S S S S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8S8S8SS 8SS 8S8S8S8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W8W10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W 10W DYH8WB 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W8W8W8W8WDYHLOT 1 7.45 acs.S0°36'42"E 91.53'S0°36'42"E 349.46'S14°38'53"E 20.62' S8°31'42"E 71.68' S40°46'21"E 79.35' N89°05'06"E 360.91'R =2 5 5 .0 0 'L =116 .4 3 ' Δ =2 6 °0 9 '3 8 " R =3 4 5 .0 0 ' L =16 2 .19 ' Δ =2 6 °5 6 '0 7 " LOT 1 6.84 acs. 70.00' 70.00'R=180.00'L=149.40'Δ=47°33'14"R=110.00'L=91.30'Δ=47°33'14"N0°42'18"W 70.45'S0°42'18"E 70.55'R=120.00'L=99.40'Δ=47°27'38"R=190.00'L=157.39'Δ=47°27'38"N0°36'42"W 224.93'S0°36'42"E 224.93'S46°5 0'56" W 60.01'L=91.30'L=99.40'L=157.39'N46°50' 56" E 60.01' 659.07' N89°06'04"E 98.48' LOT 2 1.74 acs.S0°35'07"E 259.52'S89°23'11"W 251.12'N0°36'49"W 168.00'S89°23'18"W 114.71' R=345.00' L=162.19' Δ=26°56'07"N0°09'06"W 527.88'60.00'S89°23'18"W 334.10' S89°23'18"W 334.10'S89°23'18"W 365.96' MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2025 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/07/2025 PLOTTED BY: rosie nickelson DRAWING NAME: N:\5659\018 Providence - ZMA Blk 1 MS 494\ACAD\Exhibits\5659.018 Groundwater Monitoring Well Map.dwg 1/4 SEC.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE PROJ. #:SHEET OF COUNTY,DATE: SCALE: CLIENT: FIELD WORK: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:22 GALLATIN 5659.018 1"=70' 12/2023 JW NM MMI 5 EAST 2 SOUTH 24NW MONTANA PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANAengineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 www.m-m.net 70 14035700 SCALE IN FEET BASIS OF BEARING Bobcat Coordinate System, NAD83(2011) per the "Rocky Mountain Tribal Coordinate Reference System" Handbook and User Guide, Published September 30th, 2014 and subsequent revisions, established by observations with survey-grade GNSS receivers. ALL LOTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING UTILITY EASEMENTS (EXCEPT THE RESTRICTED LOTS): - 10' ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY - 10' ALONG SIDE LOT LINES - 10' ALONG REAR LOT LINES PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS (P.U.E.) LEGEND SET A REBAR 5/8" DIA.., WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP, "MMI 16411LS". FOUND REBAR AS MARKED MID-SECTION CORNER23 24 FOUND BRASS CAP SECTION CORNER FOUND A.C. PER C.C.R.F. 4-484 25 24 2326 FOUND A.C. ON 5/8 INCH REBAR MARKED MERIDIAN LAND SURVEYING, INC. MEASURED DIMENSION(M) RECORDED DIMENSION PER MINOR SUBDIVISION No. 494(R) ALUMINUM CAPA.C. CERTIFIED CORNER RECORDATION FORMC.C.R.F. BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 ARNOLD STREET STAUDAHER STREET SOUTH 17TH AVENUESOUTH 15TH AVENUESOUTH 19TH AVENUEGRAF STREET PREVIOU S L O T 1 B L O C K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 PREVIOU S L O T 4 B L O C K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 PREVIOU S L O T 3 B L O C K 1 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 PREVIOU S L O T 2 B L O C K 1 MINOR SU B 4 9 4 P R E V I O U S L O T L I N E PREVIOUS LOT LINEPREVIOUS LOT LINEPREVIOUS LOT LINE PREVIOUS LOT LINEPREVIOUS LOT LINE PREVIOUS LOT LINE LOT 1 BL O C K 2 MINOR S U B 4 9 4 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #16 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #17 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #14 SRX-II SUBDIVISION GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #10 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #13 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #12 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #15 GROUNDWATER MON. WELL - #9 RESTRICTED LOT 1 F APPENDIX F EMAIL CORRESPONDANCE 1 Celine Saucier From:Simon Lindley <slindley@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent:Thursday, November 7, 2024 4:02 PM To:Celine Saucier Subject:Re: [EXTERNAL][SENDER UNVERIFIED]RE: SRX North Sewer ***This message originated from an External Source.*** Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this message. Hi Celine, I just talked to Shawn about the SRX II sewer and we're good with 10-inch sewer in Staudaher and 8-inch sewer in 15th, assuming you can meet the minimum slope requirements. Looking at the plans, you will need another manhole in 15th to meet the 400 foot maximum distance between manholes. Please note the upsizing will be at the cost of the developer, the city will not contribute to the upsizing since this is not in the master plans. Thanks, City of Bozeman MT Transportation and Engineering Department Simon Lindley, EI | Engineer I DL: 406.582.2288 slindley@bozeman.net Engineering | City Of Bozeman Infrastructure Process Diagram From: Celine Saucier <csaucier@m-m.net> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 9:57 AM To: Simon Lindley <slindley@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][SENDER UNVERIFIED]RE: SRX North Sewer CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Simon – See attached pdfs for your reference, let me know if you have any questions Celine Saucier, PE Senior Engineer, Morrison-Maierle +14069226822 direct | +14065870721 office main A 100% Employee-Owned Company From: Simon Lindley <slindley@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 12:26 PM 2 To: Celine Saucier <csaucier@m-m.net> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL][SENDER UNVERIFIED]RE: SRX North Sewer ***This message originated from an External Source.*** Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this message. Hi Celine, Could you provide us a preliminary profile using 10-inch sewer in Staudaher and 8-inch sewer in 15th so we can get a better idea of the slopes. Please label the slopes for each segment and include the drop in the manholes. If this layout works then Shawn will likely allow you to use 10-inch but we would like a better understanding about what slopes might work. Thanks, City of Bozeman MT Transportation and Engineering Department Simon Lindley, EI | Engineer I DL: 406.582.2288 slindley@bozeman.net Engineering | City Of Bozeman Infrastructure Process Diagram From: Celine Saucier <csaucier@m-m.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 9:37 AM To: Simon Lindley <slindley@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: [EXTERNAL][SENDER UNVERIFIED]RE: SRX North Sewer CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Wanted to follow up with you on that sewer main line and whether or not we would be able to upsize it to a 10” – let me know what you were able to find out, thanks! Celine Saucier, PE Senior Engineer, Morrison-Maierle +14069226822 direct | +14065870721 office main A 100% Employee-Owned Company From: Celine Saucier Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2024 4:19 PM To: Simon Lindley <slindley@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: SRX North Sewer Simon – Attached is a simple exhibit with our two surveyed points at 19th and the stub at 15th. With the 0.2’ drop between at each manhole (6) we are at 0.32%. If we were able to use a 10” line instead of an 8” that would help us meet the minimum slope requirement. Let me know what you think, thanks! 3 Celine Saucier, PE Senior Engineer, Morrison-Maierle +14069226822 direct | +14065870721 office main 2880 Technology Blvd W, Bozeman, MT 59718 A 100% Employee-Owned Company City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be protected from disclosure under law.