HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-14-25 Public Comment - S. Cowan - July 14 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA- Centennial Park downzoningFrom:Susanne Cowan
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]July 14 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA- Centennial Park downzoning
Date:Sunday, July 13, 2025 9:07:56 PM
Attachments:Cowan-City Council-UDC-Zoning-2025-July 14.pdf
Cowan-Centennial Park-Inventory-2025.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Commission,
Attached is a letter and a report for public comment for the July 14 special meeting on UDCZoning. It concencerns Centennial Park downzoning.
Sincerely,
Susanne Cowan
3132 Wagonwheel Road, Unit 27, Bozeman, MT 59715
July 13, 2025
Bozeman City Council
121 N Rouse Ave.
Bozeman, MT 59715
Dear City Council Members,
My name is Dr. Susanne Cowan and I am an Associate Professor of Architecture History in
the School of Architecture at Montana State University. I am writing to share the research I
conducted for the Centennial Park neighborhood as part of their petition to downzone their
neighborhood from R-4 to R-A as part of the revisions of the Unified Development Code.
In 2021 to 2022 I coauthored a report, Investigating Neighborhood Character in the
Northeast Neighbor of Bozeman, which showed dense infill development of luxury homes,
often called mansionification, is degrading the social character and aPordability of the
Northeast neighborhood. You can read that report at
https://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17256.
This year I have updated the architectural inventory of the Centennial Park portion of the
neighborhood at their request. This area includes 11 Blocks between Tamarack and Peach
and North 3rd and Bozeman, excluding the Senior Center and Bridger Heights Apartments. I
have attached an 8-page report of the findings of this inventory. This updated inventory
shows that:
•78% of properties contain only one single family detached home
•74% of the main structures on the property are one story tall
•56% of the homes are small midcentury homes (many under 1000 square feet)
•Less than 1% of structures are 3 stories tall
•Only 2% of properties have four or more homes
•Only 3 of 130 properties have four to eight attached homes
This inventory shows that this neighborhood despite being zoned R-4, was originally built in
a form more similar to the current R-2 zoning. While the area has some density from
second detached homes and ADUs (9% of properties) and from some duplexes and
triplexes (12% of properties), it would be significantly changed by more R-4 or R-C style
development. R-A zoning would still allow additional density from attached or detached
homes and ADUs to allow for gradual and context sensitive development. A student of
mine tested how R-2 and R-4 zoning would impact development. Drawings of potential
development under R-4 shows how that development would dwarf existing one-story
homes. The drawings of R-2 style development would still be a change, but one less
overshadowing to the existing character.
As part of the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District it would be advantageous to
zone this area so as to protect the existing character of the neighborhood. I am concerned
that upzoning under R-C or even the current zoning under R-4 will further increase property
values providing additional financial incentives for demolition of small historic homes.
While this area has changed a little more slowly than other parts or the Northeast
neighborhood, at least 14% of properties have recently been rebuilt or extensively
expanded in recent years. The area is also being impacted by the large new 4-story
development just east of North 3rd street. It also has a few vacant properties, two in North
3rd street which show that the area is vulnerable to change that may cause further
gentrification of this neighborhood.
I support the neighborhood residents’ request that this area be zoned R-A in the new
Unified Development Code.
Sincerely,
Dr. Susanne Cowan
Associate Professor
School of Architecture, Montana State University
3132 Wagonwheel Road, Unit 27, Bozeman, MT 59715
Centennial Park:
Study for Downzoning
Dr. Susanne Cowan
Associate Professor, School of Architecture, Montana State University
July 13, 2025
Inventory of Buildings Heights
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
130 properties on which the main buildings included: 74 One-Story (57%)
90
Inventory of Number of Stories for
Residential Buildings
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
Th is map of the number of stories in neighborhood housing
shows the increase in heights in or near the B-3 Zoning border
with many residences of three or more stories. Even in the R-3
area just north of the B-3, many homes are two stories. Also
within the B-3 border are about two dozen historical homes,
many of which are one or two stories that may be negatively
aff ected by the taller buildings on their blocks from current or
future development.
90
Inventory of Number of Stories for
Residential Buildings
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
Th is map of the number of stories in neighborhood housing
shows the increase in heights in or near the B-3 Zoning border
with many residences of three or more stories. Even in the R-3
area just north of the B-3, many homes are two stories. Also
within the B-3 border are about two dozen historical homes,
many of which are one or two stories that may be negatively
aff ected by the taller buildings on their blocks from current or
future development.
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
50 Two-Story (38%) 1 Three-Story (<1%)
Inventory of Detached Homes (including ADUs)
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
102 Properties with One Detached Home (78%)
12 Properties with Two Detached Homes (e.g. ADUs) (9%)
Inventory of Attached Homes
11 Properties with Two Attached Homes (8%)
3 Properties with 4-8 Attached homes (2%)5 Properties with 3 Attached homes (4%)
97
Inventory of Multi-Family Housing & ADUs
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
97
Inventory of Multi-Family Housing & ADUs
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
(Two or more attached homes)
Inventory of Historic Homes
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
79
Northwest Quadrant
Housing Structure Inventory by Style
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
6 Victorians (5%) 1 Craftsman (<1%)
11 Other Pre-WWII Historical Styles (8%)
The area had little development before 1930, with 18 homes (14%) built in Pre-WWII styles:
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
Inventory of Midcentury Homes
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
46 Minimalist Traditional (35%)
24 Ranch (18%) 4 Log Cabins (3%)
Most of the homes (73, 56%) were built between 1930 and 1980 in typical midcentury styles.
79
Northwest Quadrant
Housing Structure Inventory by Style
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
Inventory of Newer Home Styles
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
12 Neo-Traditional (9%)
6 Contemporary (5%)
79
Northwest Quadrant
Housing Structure Inventory by Style
Prepared by Kipton Giddings and Jack Rosenthal
Cowan, et. al. 2022. Investigating Neighborhood
Character in the Northeast Neighborhood.
At least 14% of homes have been rebuilt recently in neotraditional or contemporary styles.
Neighborhood Change
Renovation since 2021 turning a Minimalist
Traditional home into a Neotraditional home
and the addition of 2 story ADU on N. Bozeman
3 vacant properties:
1 empty lot on N. 3rd,
1 vacant home on N 3rd,
1 vacant home on N.
Bozeman)
New Infill on N. 3rd Ave.
Comparing Potential Development under R-4 and R-2 Codes
R-4 Potential Development (3 story) R-2 Potential Development (2 story)
BLOCK 3 I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPARISON - CURRENT ZONING (R-4) + DOWN ZONING POTENTIAL (R-2)EXAMPLE ARCHITECTURAL INFILLR-2, USING UDC 2024 REGULATIONS
ELEVATION VIEW FROM N WILLSON AVE.
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
EXISTING STRUCTURES
POTENTIAL NEW DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE (2024 UDC)
PROPERTY LINE
EXAMPLE ARCHITECTURAL INFILL
R-4, USING UDC 2024 REGULATIONS
ELEVATION VIEW FROM N WILLSON AVE.
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
EXISTING STRUCTURES
POTENTIAL NEW DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE (2024 UDC)
PROPERTY LINE
BLOCK 3 I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT STUDY WITH CURRENT ZONING (R-4)
EXISTING CONDITIONS EXAMPLE ARCHITECTURAL INFILLR-4, USING UDC 2024 REGULATIONSMAX. BUILDING ENVELOPER-4, UNDER UDC 2024 REGULATIONS
ELEVATION VIEW FROM N WILLSON AVE.
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
ELEVATION VIEW FROM N WILLSON AVE.
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
ELEVATION VIEW FROM N WILLSON AVE.
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
NEW BUILD (SINCE 2019)
EXISTING STRUCTURES
LOTS W/ DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING STRUCTURES
POTENTIAL MAX. NEW DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE (2024 UDC)
PROPERTY LINE
L
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
EXISTING STRUCTURES
POTENTIAL NEW DEVELOPMENT ENVELOPE (2024 UDC)
PROPERTY LINE
Images by Royce Rheinschild,
School of Architecture, Montana State University