HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-10-25 Public Comment - S. Atkinson - Public Comment Regarding Unlimited Units in Low-Density Residential ZoningFrom:Susan Atkinson
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Cc:Terry Cunningham; Emma Bode; Douglas Fischer; Jennifer Madgic; Joey Morrison
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Public Comment Regarding Unlimited Units in Low-Density Residential Zoning
Date:Wednesday, July 9, 2025 10:45:23 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Public Comment Regarding Unlimited Units in Low-Density Residential Zoning
I am writing to express my strong concern about the proposal to allow an unlimited numberof dwelling units in neighborhoods zoned for low-density residential use, such as the Figginsand Allison Subdivisions.
Allowing limitless units within a single-family dwelling or lot in these areaswould dramatically alter the character, livability, and safety of our neighborhoods. These
zoning districts were designed to support quiet, stable, and family-oriented communities—nothigh-density development by loophole.
Reasons to Limit the Number of Units Per Dwelling in Low-Density
Neighborhoods:
1. Preserve Neighborhood Character
Low-density zones are intended to maintain spacious, quiet neighborhoods. Unlimitedunits would result in overcrowded properties, overbuilt structures, and a complete
departure from the existing character that residents moved here for.
2. Strain on Infrastructure
Streets, water/sewer systems, and emergency services were not designed to support theincreased load that comes with many households occupying one property. This puts
undue stress on public resources and risks degrading essential services.
3. Traffic and Parking Problems
Multiple households on a single lot can lead to excess cars, congested streets, and unsafedriving conditions, especially on roads not designed for high traffic volumes or on-street
overflow parking.
4. Noise and Nuisance Complaints
More units per lot means more people, more activity, and often, more noise anddisturbances. This can be especially disruptive in neighborhoods designed for low
density and peace.
5. Impact on Property Values
Densification through unlimited units may lower the desirability of single-familyneighborhoods, potentially reducing property values and discouraging long-term
homeownership.
6. Lack of Oversight and Accountability
Without limits, there's no mechanism to prevent exploitation of the zoning rules by
absentee landlords or developers who may prioritize profit over community welfare.
7. School Overcrowding
An influx of residents could burden local schools, reducing quality of education andstretching resources beyond capacity.
Reasonable Solution:
If the intent is to increase housing availability, it must be done thoughtfully andincrementally—perhaps by allowing ADUs or duplexes with clear limits—not by removingall caps and inviting chaos into well-established neighborhoods.
I urge you to reconsider this decision and establish clear, enforceable limits on the number ofdwelling units permitted on a lot in low-density residential zones. Our neighborhoods andcommunity fabric depend on it.
Respectfully,
Susan Atkinson 2409 Westridge,