The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About212-NortonEastWetlandsMemo Norton East Wetland Delineation - May 2021 � x,:�`' -�' b ...* . �� ::^�''i'..• ` • .,1"�'_:, • ,�1�`,� � A�i . . � ' �.'� y 4�e:,�;,��.:�;, . �,;; � �� `�(f �� \�� ''��d,�+y�,�`�fF,�i �`y• , .a • S � �p. `�1�+��,,�� ;� 1P r�{,� � •.v '', � I�T/lf� :b� ��, � �•�•,r �. .`�r��.�.Za7� ��`�.��'�+q ;�'� `. �A . . �'i�, I ,. �}��,�t� .y� � :.�� ` �t�:� .� i��+�- �� , � � � � Ab z�. �� , ��ti ,�;; .�;�� .d N=��.�s ':�" �:;� � ��,, ,� i ; -Y� '' ,A, $ ' - �,. � '.�n,i�' ' . ��.1•�' 'i t ,y�: `+.4}��-' �+L ,� � .t� 'r'w� S �. � `�� ,� f� ;..t � , ' � �,p � , � , '�� 1' �,!�,A,fiY,+ ��'��'�, ' ,�i�i��". ,;�. . I : � � 'r. ' � � �t �Y��.'E�* 1�: � �k, • � s �[��, {,� � �, � �.,,.x K r ��tr ,,�.".� �: , �W\ :; �+ <� �.i��:^E'4y; �t�..1�,��. e`�,j. y1►. � k:�, .:� � : �+�` „ `X �i"� �' �� "�.�,i,�'`��;; `� ,,;. �'�'�� :� , � , ,�p� '�' `��'``.� J�vy��Fi�. `i��.tM y��1. i ., . .. ,�L� . � . .0 . Prepared for: Kilday Stratton Prepared by: �� Morrison � Maierle ��_,....� � �_�... ��., _ . � ..,... 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 June 2021 Project No. 5418.002 Norton East �� Morrison Wetland Delineation � Maierle Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 2 Methods................................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................1 2.2 Soil.................................................................................................................................................1 2.3 Hydrology......................................................................................................................................2 3 Results...................................................................................................................................................2 3.1 Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................2 3.2 Soil.................................................................................................................................................2 3.3 Hydrology......................................................................................................................................3 3.3.1 Topography...........................................................................................................................3 3.3.2 National Wetland Inventory..................................................................................................3 3.3.3 Floodplains and On-Site Hydrology.......................................................................................3 4 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................3 5 References ............................................................................................................................................4 Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B USACE Wetland Determination Forms Appendix C Site Photographs Page i Norton East �� Morrison Wetland Delineation � Maierle 1 Introduction Morrison-Maierle, Inc. (Morrison-Maierle) completed a wetland delineation for the Norton East project located in Bozeman, Montana. This technical memo summarizes the findings of the wetland investigation. The project area consisted of 42 acres of land located north of West Babcock Street in Gallatin County, Montana. Appendix A includes figures of the project area location. 2 Methods The wetland investigation utilized the methodology presented in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and subsequent modifications outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast (Version 2.0) (Environmental Laboratory 2010). Upland data points (UDP) and wetland data points (WDP)were established as needed during the field visit. Sample data points were labeled with an UDP or WDP, followed by the number associated with the data point, (e.g. noted here in bold (UDP 1)to correspond to the sample points for that location. Data for vegetation, hydrology, and soils were recorded in the field and entered on Wetland Determination Data Forms located in Appendix B. Photographs of sample points are provided in Appendix C. Sample points and wetland boundaries (if present) were recorded using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) unit and post-processed to sub-meter accuracy. Locations were then converted to shapefiles and uploaded into ArcMap 10.7.1 for display on figures included in Appendix A. 2.1 Vegetation Vegetation at upland and wetland data points was classified based on wetland indicator status. The indicator status of vegetation was derived from the 2018 National Wetland Plant List(USACE 2018). Using the current plant list, vegetation cover qualified as hydrophytic where over 50% of the dominant plant species had an indicator status of obligate (OBL), facultative wet (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC). FAC plants, such as Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), are equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands. Vegetation cover was considered as upland where over 50% of the dominant plant species were classified as upland (UPL), and/or facultative upland (FACU). Plants observed within each data plot were identified using Montana Manual of Vascular Plants (Lesica 2012). 2.2 Soil Wetlands must meet the qualifications of at least one hydric soil indicator, or meet the definition of a hydric soil (a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (NRCS 2019a)). Soils at each data point were evaluated and described notating the depth, matrix color, mottle abundance and contrast (if present), texture, etc. (Environmental Laboratory, 1987 and 2010). Page 1 Norton East �� Morrison Wetland Delineation � Maierle Moist matrix color and moist mottle color of the soils were determined utilizing the Munsell Soil Color Chart (Kollmorgan Instruments Corporation, 2009). 2.3 Hydrology Primary and secondary hydrologic indicators were assessed at each wetland and upland data point; one primary indicator or two secondary indicators are required to qualify the area as containing wetland hydrology. Examples of primary hydrologic indicators are saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface, surface water, and water table within 12 inches of the ground surface. Examples of secondary hydrologic indicators are FAC-neutral test and geomorphic position on the landscape. 3 Results A wetland delineation of the project area was performed by a Morrison-Maierle environmental scientist on May 25, 2021. The vegetation, hydrology, and soil characteristics at each of nine data points were documented in the field and recorded on Wetland Determination Data Forms for the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast(Supplement, 2010). 3.1 Vegetation Vegetation communities were evaluated and documented to delineate wetland and upland boundaries. The upland herbaceous areas within the project consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), wood's rose (Rosa woodsia, FACU), and American licorice (Glycyrrhiza lepidota, FAC). The wetlands within the project area were dominated by reed canary grass and cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL). The location of all data points is identified on Figure 5 of Appendix A. 3.2 Soil Mapped soil types within the project area were obtained from the Web Soil Survey(NRCS 2021 b). According to the Web Soil Survey, five soil types are located within the project area: • Hyalite-Beaverton complex, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes (448A) • Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes (509B) • Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes (510B) • Lamoose silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (537A) • Hyalite-Beaverton complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes (748A) Soils were analyzed in the field for texture and color using the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell 2009). The upland soils exhibited a 10YR 2/1 silty clay down to approximately 12 inches. Soil in the wetland areas also exhibited a 10YR 2/1 silty clay down to approximately 12 inches and the hydric soil indicator is loamy mucky mineral (F1). It was noted that there was not much difference between the soils in the upland and wetland areas. This field has gone though several changes over the years including draining, farming, excavation, and fill. Page 2 Norton East �� Morrison Wetland Delineation � Maierle 3.3 Hydrology 3.3.1 Topography The project area lies within the Bozeman, Montana (2020), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5- minute Topographic Map. The project area lies at approximately 4,800 feet above sea level (Appendix A, Figure 1). A perennial stream, Baxter Creek, is shown to intersect the project area. 3.3.2 National Wetland Inventory The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) maintains the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), which serves as a publicly available resource that provides detailed information on the abundance, characteristics, and distribution of US Wetlands. According to the NWI database, several freshwater emergent wetland (PEM1A and PEM1C) features are present within the investigation area (USFWS 2021). Appendix A, Figure 4 depicts the NWI features in the project vicinity. 3.3.3 Floodplains and On-Site Hydrology The project area is located within Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) FIRM Panel 30031 C0811 D with an effective date of September 2, 2011 (FEMA 2021). The floodplain data for this area is not printed and cannot be viewed. The project area consists of several wetland areas with similar hydrology indicator. These include geomorphic position, standing water, and shallow water table. Upland areas did not exhibit any hydrology indicators. 4 Conclusion The western half of the subject property contained 4 seemingly isolated wetlands, which included a stormwater pond. The eastern half of the subject property contained remnants of an unused irrigation ditch and the OHWM of Baxter Creek. Baxter Creek also maintained a wetland fringe. In total the following resources were delineated on the subject property: Feature Size Wetlands 6.76 acres Baxter Creek 780 linear feet Remnant irri ation ditch 1,166 linear feet Borrow it ond 1.54 acres Based on the results of the wetland delineation performed according to USACE guidelines, it is Morrison-Maierle's professional judgement that portions of the project area meet the technical criteria to be classified as wetlands and waterways. The USACE is the final authority over Waters of the U.S., and a jurisdictional determination would need to be submitted to the USACE for review to make that determination. Page 3 Norton East �� Morrison Wetland Delineation � Maierle 5 References Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. Environmental Laboratory. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast. (Version 2.0) U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory. Vicksburg, MS. Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). 2021. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home Lesica, P. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Brit Press. Fort Worth, Texas. Montana Department of Agriculture. 2017. Montana Noxious Weed List. Effective: February 2017. https://agr.mt.gov/Portals/168/Documents/Weeds/2017%20Noxious%20Weed %20List.pdf Munsell. 2009. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgan Instruments. New Windsor, NY. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019b. Hydric Soils Definition. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/use/hyd ric/?cid=nres 142p2_053961 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2021a. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2018. National Wetland Plant List 2018. http://wetland- plants.usace.army.mil/ US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2021. National Wetland Inventory Wetlands Mapper. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html U.S. Geological Survey. 2020. Bozeman, Montana, 7.5-minute Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. Page 4 APPENDIX A: FIGURES i��,��P�, i�i � .-.*�� f�:�1 i'n(S$.'. •-� T . ^� . . I ��=� r.� . e NORTON EAST RANCH PROPERTY '�e��'�` ~�f��;:�r' =. �� '��- 7 BOZEMAN MONTANA ��+��. � # � � � �^ �� i i �F�, �iJ.3� �y I.' � ',f��,{��.��'.�'�f_�,.: %.� � , � T2S R5E SEC 9 �;�`�{�=��r:"t;-'��-- � � GALLATIN COUNTY �#':,�_��',.��r�. � ' _ ` , . ;_�� ..; � � ..:� �`, , f�, � �. ,,�� ..+. '��•i�-� �� r� 'fi��a'�-::.�. �� . r ��., --��:� ,�- �_, `,:� �.�� , i .� � < � �� ' / 'f, ;� � � 940�` go , a `,I � � �\ �� \ ,�," '>\ � _ � -.� , \ ; " , � '- � 'fi' . - • . � `�� , �.�� _ GR.4q� ` /, ' � � ��'tIU��. - r � ��- �� r\� � �lI � I � �\ _ . \.J -►—� � \ \ 6 31�,� " � ! `- , �36 O' o ` `� \ � ��0 `1 � �� \ � � � _ � 1 �T ' 6 T " , 8 RDfR � � - - . - : Far' r I �� _ __ DURSTON RD �� : _ � � Q. , . � �3�em�lh �� 1 Pa _ 85 ' � II � J �J r , _ r� 'HUFFLINE RD � ' :�i` QTS `'� . �� .:��yeu�qt' „v��r;f �, �i - � � �t)�spr��, �—� a� � . ' BQ2C "'� il �" ; I� -�� ''� Ho3 S � - .,`_`'• _ ;� _ �3 � • � ` 1� ' O �) . .. �` .(�. , o ttA , �7Vv � , � V V O � ; / . � � � , \\ �� I �I � 'vl � � i, \ \ j � 1--- J � C � 2 • �.}�: I t 97 "•.�� Q i `�' � �, � � --` � " �; � , y , Legend ��;_ , `�� ,`�.• ,0 N � Investigation Area �� Miies n _ GRAOE - 0 0.5 1 2 N 1 ' — — — — j i - 2880 Technology Bldv. PROJECT NO. � Morrison eOZemao,N1T5978 DRAWNBY BC TOPOGRAPHIC &VICINITY MAP sa,sooz \ CHK'D BY: BC GALLATIN COUNTY MT � �� Phone:(406)587-0721 Fax(406)922-6702 APPR.BY: CP FIGURE No. engineers s��eYo�s planners s��e�t�s�s �oPYR,�HT:�;MORR,SON-MA,ER�E,,N�.,ZOZ, DATE:6/16/2021 NORTON EAST RANCH PROPERTY 1 N�.\5418\002-MasterA reemenflGlS\Exhibits�2021 WD\Fi 1 Vicinit.mxd �� .�-rv-� , - - _ _ ._ �;�, .� . , :�� - � `� *�fi=r��+. � �l �`��,� � �� i�r;� � ��-�� ` , r 4 � ., -► i _ ` __ �, s� ..�-�, � , _ �„ (�- . _ �t rr"f FI�� !�' �� .� ,f "F: �� c �� .`I { �c. -�� i p�, �.�:� � �'C�"� �. ' f.�,�,;�t„',f f ' �� /` �J �, �� F� - F t� r-f'' - i'�. _ ��.11�� _�, '•i. - �'�r ?+ �i� -`1 _ - 1� +a'�;`F'M !.�. ... � `'' iq r��•4�i�r��f '� �''1 �, � ,. ��,' _ '.� �'' ', ,� �,�,., y y � �, DURSTON RD ��.�I�',_ -•-��i -, �,=,-r��,, . � �'�� `� '�' �.:___"-.:�=� . � ��f,�� ' .�; r L�lB � �� r�� ,� �,�� t '� ;�'�f f'f� � c��'-� � �' :Y'(`��`',�� -- ♦ � k"�. yf� � �. ' r:�� - , � ' ��. . srR '��..-�"" / � A ! ��. ��'�{�Ql�;1,1. y��,,:¢/°' r�r, ,�,� 7'. \ � �.� y"� ..�•R7rrY '�' a� ,�, � i �•.._ _ _ __ — y. '.� 'r � n F.. � r'' �^ i "' � ;}"� p .r°' ��`f �L - - �C •� . • ��'s � .- � ,�'' �.:,;� t!�;��-J-�. r r�L� "�i ��' (. R� ` '!'a�+'�\� ,A �� C� — �"' f r M ` ` r' ' � � �� ;a �' '°' � yt' — ,��',��'�, . 1 � � *, i; �:-� � ;�' T o . °� � �,��:�� ; �� ,�v ;� , Q �, ._ . �. � �� ❑ �,�� _ O Z � �� ,. � � •a� - I�� I��,:�� ' ��. �€�� :� - �- �r �#-,. i � a p ti 4°S�i. ��,.�� i i ��. I,i�'.. U i �lV. I � �I , • ��r��'��,� ' i �+ ��L �I Y � �I � i �� ` � � ,�'.� � rl , . I ;`�; Y(`� r,-� � -�I�l1 .J!P '� �j I.c� �I� �. �Irttra�--,a-z-r /`�- . Glr_ . .J`��I I '.1 �y�� i�r ..:�� P'�� f� � +- I . � i I �� i.��ry� � , � ��:I��'� �1�� ; � ,�,�,t� � i - � _ �.,�I�' : '��t�.�� _ ��r ,t � �I� �� ►�, �� ,; ��, c. �_ ��,,� . � I ��_ `� � .�` ��' •�.�, ,,�� f, � �" , , •� , i,� �� ' , _, ,,,,� ;._ . . -- ��'r.r a �*^� �1. �� r� .. ' .��! �' ' � ..°� �,w�.� _—� . G�4,� i + � �^�-:a. ��:c �� ') � ��' � ,I �I� �� I'.. t �. . ` ,... �...; . . . .�� I ... - - -- - — --_ ._ ., .��_ �i�' j� � ;�� r'�'��'LLF �, , , _ �� '.�Z`Z;� �� r� -j;�.� ' ,:, r - �4 ,: ��i u � - Legend "6 � ��, _ t:,`. ," � �:�_. HUFFLINE RD N � Investigation Area Feet � 0 400 800 1,600 2880 Technology Bldv. PROJECT NO. � Morrison eOZema° N1T5978 DRAWNBY BC 2019 NAIPAERIAL MAP sa,sooz \ CHK'D BY: BC GALLATIN COUNTY MT � �� Phone:(406)587-0721 Fax:(406)922-6702 APPR.BY: CP FIGURE NO. engineers s��eYo�s planners s��e�t�s�s �oPYR,�HT:�;MORR,SON-MA,ER�E,,N�.,ZOZ, DATE:6/16/2021 NORTON EAST RANCH PROPERTY 2 C�.\GISTem\Fi 2 Aerial.mxd �` a �``= ��' •�.�,�� "-`,-�y�..�� yr �:l'� � � �� r � �,/^rti b .� .. � ._ . . r �,• �Q � � � ' ,v` '. P� �i '� � �� ' � .�` �` � " `� • - }, ' a ''�� j � a° � � �; j ' �,; ?�� - '�•• � �, � `. . ' �`� , ' , r� 1'� �� 'z +R� �_ � t �� .. '�- �� . . �,,. � �` °� •. .� � � — ��;�, ` �. �. �. '� � . . .I` �r � �. � . G* fA r � ;�b� k � + � �� . . -� - �-e: � .. ;. ,'�',� — �' o' � ' a� � . . 0°� r � �. �� o°p a�c° �a � „_ _� W BABCOCK ST ,r � � � �►�,.�, �� ._.,� 1 �, � ��..a .� _ • � -�� -�Y� ._ � � 1 ` � ' - � � � �/� � � � �_.___ i�� z �' —`-�� _ � � i . I i �. � ° ' � ' � .;::�, �* ! � ; ; r • � � i i + ►'' T '�' l � — �1 � I�" � . I I I I � � � i a� � � �. ,�,�,-� i � _ ...�� ' p ' � � _— . i , � , -. '� , , ' :��: � � � # s� �� : I 1 i� ► '� ;. , �� i q Y�� ,. �» Legend .• _ _—"— �� i � �� _..��.y, �� . . _ .. _ 4 '�"" � Investigation Area " �" �° w � �" �' � � .� .� N NRCS Soil Map Unit Feet n 0 200 400 800 N , 2880 Technology Bldv. PROJECT NO. Morrison eOZema° N1T5978 DRAWNBY BC NRCS SOILS MAP sa,sooz ■ \ CHK'D BY: BC GALLATIN COUNTY MT � �� Phone:(406)587-0721 Fa,r.(406)922-6702 APPR.BY: CP FIGURE NO. engineers s��eYo�s planners s��e�t�s�s �oPYR,�HT:�;MORR,SON-MA,ER�E,,N�.,ZOZ, DATE:6/16/2021 NORTON EAST RANCH PROPERTY 3 N�.\5418\002-MasterA reemenflGlS\Exhibits�2021 WD\Fi 3 Soils.mxd � - - .4i � � '� � 4 : ` '/ � � � fi_ .�_a... �� i� ��-y;�� - � . � �� i �� ; . � � �.�, , . �� , � � _ � . , ��:.-� . -� ? , E � . . .. t� _ - � . , � , � � � �. , r . •� I � {�;�� 'b�'' fA r �� '� �� 1 f� , � �r9 �i � ` �.,. .. . � . , ...-' -_ •� '.6� �k� . ., �� .� - . . { �,�* .,� '� � .-��. . _r�� ;- �, r r � � � � . r`� *� � 4��. �. r��' f - � _ „_ _� W BABCOCK ST ,r � � �� 4 i►'�,"r11��,. .:�I � _ __� � , � a e ._ _ _ • r'� -'Y�� 1�� I i � ' — ��- — - � � �� I �� z I _•�_� � i � � � � � �� ' � �j, � � � � , � � � , . � �t ' i � � �p , $� I S ; r�� 1 , • ... � ,*�� '�1ffy...fi3..7 � � i� ► � -� � �� r . � �''�� "� �� 1 ! 0 ' j � � �� - � I �$ i ' ! �' � ' Legend } , i �� ' ' , � * � �� i � - � T . ;"��; i��tw � Investigation Area •� -� " ''_ �� 9�� ; - �' - 4 .��. Freshwater Emergent Wetland � w� � � � ,�, _ N Freshwater Pond Feet n 0 200 400 800 N , 2880 Technology Bldv. PROJECT NO. � Morrison eOZemao,N1T5978 DRAWNBY BC NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP sa,sooz \ CHK'D BY: BC GALLATIN COUNTY MT � �� Phone:(406)587-0721 Fax:(406)922-6702 APPR.BY: CP FIGURE NO. engineers s��eYo�s planners s��e�t�s�s �oPYR,�HT:�;MORR,SON-MA,ER�E,,N�.,ZOZ, DATE:6/16/2021 NORTON EAST RANCH PROPERTY 4 N�.\5418\002-MasterA reemenflGlS\Exhibits�2021 WD\Fi 4 NWl.mxd . r _ • � � x � � � - ° I � �� n� � , _ � f _* . 'ka': .__' ' ' " v.f f� .j . � _ i/ . UDP 3 �, n � WDP-4 UDP 4 � � UDP 5 � WET 3 � �' �� Q .; UDP 2 � � , O WDP 3 i • , � , WET 1 �c WDP 1 � UDP 1 p � ' '• �, R � WET 5 M �.� €-► ; � J ,_� • WDP 2 O . � WET 2 W BABCOCK ST a__. _� . . ..� , �__ �."�..'�- � ''�' �- � Feature Area (ac) - � - - WET1 2.18 Legend ��E +� a W ET 2 0.09 � � Investigation Area Pond (1.54 acres) ,r— � WET 3 2.58 '! ' i ` WET4 1.57 Wetlands (6.76 acres) O Upland Data Point � + � ` �` W ET 5 0.34 � Stream (780 linear feet) • Wetland Data Point • �M � x '� "�` N Ditch (1,1661inearfeet) Feet � 0 125 250 500 t 2880 Technology Bldv. PROJECT NO. � Morrison BOZema°,N1T5978 DRAWNBY BC N►ETLAND DELINEATION MAP sa,sooz \ CHK'D BY: BC GALLATIN COUNTY MT � �� Phone:(406)587-0721 Fa,r.(406)922-6702 APPR.BY: CP FIGURE No. engineers s��eYo�s planners s��e�t�s�s �oPYR,�HT:�;MORR,SON-MA,ER�E,,N�.,ZOZ, DATE:6/23/2021 NORTON EAST RANCH PROPERTY 5 N�.\5418\002-MasterA reemenflGlS\Exhibits\2021 WD\Fi 5 WD.mxd APPENDIX B: USACE WETLAND DETERMINATION FORMS Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 1 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Upland Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.67902 Long: -]1].1 14753 Soil Map Unit Name: 509B NWl classification: none Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X ls the Sample Area within a yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X �'etland? No X Remarks:Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes (includes cappillary fringe) No X Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 1 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species ] (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 50% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 65 x 2= 130 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 35 x 4= 140 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 270 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 3 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rosa woodsii 35 YES FACU Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is>50% 3 Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 35 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Phalaris arundinacea 65 YES FACW in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 65 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana UDP 1 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]2 lOYR 2/] ]00 silry clay Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes No X Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 2 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):upland plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.6799 Long: -]1 1.1 12283 Soil Map Unit Name: 510B NWl classification: none Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X ls the Sample Area within a yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X �'etland? No X Remarks:Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes (includes cappillary fringe) No X Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 2 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species ] (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 50% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 60 x 2= 120 4 FAC species 20 x 3= 60 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 260 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 3 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rosa woodsii 20 YES FACU Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 Dominance Test is>50% 3 Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 20 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Phalaris arundinacea 60 YES FACW in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 Glycyrrhiza lepidota 10 NO FAC height 3 Equisetum arvense 10 NO FAC 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 80 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was not observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana UDP 2 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]2 lOYR 2/] ]00 silry clay Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes No X Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 3 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):upland plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.6827 7 Long: -]1 1.1 12606 Soil Map Unit Name: 748A NWl classification: none Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology X significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X ls the Sample Area within a yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X �'etland? No X Remarks:Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes (includes cappillary fringe) No X Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 3 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species ] (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 100 x 2= 200 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 200 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 2 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Phalaris arundinacea ]00 YES FACW in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 7 00 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana UDP 3 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]4 lOYR 2/] ]00 silry clay Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes No X Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 4 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):upland plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.68189 Long: -]1 1.1 11882 Soil Map Unit Name: 748A NWl classification: none Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology X significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X ls the Sample Area within a yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X �'etland? No X Remarks:Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes (includes cappillary fringe) No X Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 4 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 40 x 2= 80 4 FAC species 50 x 3= l50 5 FACU species 10 x 4= 40 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 270 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 3 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Cirsium arvense 50 YES FAC in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 Phalaris arundinacea 40 YES FACW height 3 Sisymbrium altissimum 10 NO FACU 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 7 00 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. Hydrology appears to have been altered,as there are dead cattails but no new cattail growth.l SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana UDP 4 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]4 lOYR 2/] ]00 silry clay Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes No X Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: UDP 5 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.):upland plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.68]8 Long: -]1 1.1]0153 Soil Map Unit Name: 537A NWl classification: PEMA Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology X significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X ls the Sample Area within a yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X �'etland? No X Remarks:Based on the absence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location does not meet the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes (includes cappillary fringe) No X Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were not observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana UDP 5 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 67% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 50 x 2= 100 4 FAC species 30 x 3= 90 5 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 270 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 3 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rosa woodsii 20 YES FACU Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 20 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Phalaris arundinacea 50 YES FACW in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 Glycyrrhiza lepidota 30 YES FAC height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 80 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana UDP 5 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]4 lOYR 2/] ]00 silry clay Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes No X Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were not observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner. Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: WDP 1 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.679]6 Long: -]1].1 14851 Soil Map Unit Name: 509B NWl classification: none Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology X significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No ls the Sample Area within a yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Wetland? No Remarks:Based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location meets the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) X Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No �epth(;nches 2 Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes X (includes cappillary fringe) No Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 1 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species 2 (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 2 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 50 x 1 = 50 3 FACW species 50 x 2= 100 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 150 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 2 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 X Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Phalaris arundinacea 50 YES FACW in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 Typha latifolia 50 YES OBL height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 7 00 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana WDP 1 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]2 l 0YR 2/] ]00 silty clay loam heavy organics/muck Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes X No Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: WDP 2 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): wet meadow Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.67858 Long: -]1].1 14497 Soil Map Unit Name: 510B NWl classification: none Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No ls the Sample Area within a yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Wetland? No Remarks:Based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location meets the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) X Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, X High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No �epth(;nches 4 Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes X (includes cappillary fringe) No Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were observed at this location.This data point was recarded in the location of a man-made storm water pond. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 2 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 80 x 1 = 80 3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 120 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 1 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 X Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Typha latifolia 60 YES OBL in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 Carex utriculata 20 YES OBL height 3 Phalaris arundinacea 20 YES FACW 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 7 00 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana WDP 2 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]2 l 0YR 2/] ]00 silty clay loam heavy organics/muck Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes X No Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: WDP 3 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): wet meadow Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.67978 Long: -]1 1.1 12387 Soil Map Unit Name: 510B NWl classification: PEMA Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No ls the Sample Area within a yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Wetland? No Remarks:Based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location meets the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, X High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes X (includes cappillary fringe) No Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 3 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species 3 (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 3 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species 60 x 1 = 60 3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40 4 FAC species 20 x 3= 60 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 160 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 2 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 X Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Typha latifolia 60 YES OBL in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 Equisetum arvense 20 YES FAC height 3 Phalaris arundinacea 20 YES FACW 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 7 00 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana WDP 3 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]2 l 0YR 2/] ]00 silty clay loam heavy organics/muck Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes X No Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were observed at this location. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W ETLAND DETERMINATTON DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project Site: Norton East City/Counry: Gallatin Sampling Date: 5/25/2021 Applicant/Owner: Greg&Kilday Stratton State: Montana Sampling Point: WDP 4 Investigator(s): C.Pearcy Section/Range: S9 T2 S RS E Slope(%): 0-5 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): fringe to Baxter Creek Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Datum: NAD83 SP MT Subregion(LRR or MLRA): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Lat 45.68202 Long: -]1 1.1]0429 Soil Map Unit Name: 537A NWl classification: PEMA Are climadc/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology significantly disturbed'? Are Vegetation Soil Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,ect. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No ls the Sample Area within a yes X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Wetland? No Remarks:Based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology,this location meets the criteria of a wetland. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology lndicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(MLRA 1,2, X High Water Table(A2) MLRA l,2,4A,an d4B) 4A,an d4B) Saturation(A3) Salt Crust(B 11) Drainage Patterns(B 10) Water Marks(Bl) Aquatic Invertebrates(B73) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Sediment Deposits(B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) X Geomorphic Position(D2) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(D3) Iron Deposits(BS) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) FAC-Neutral Test(DS) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) S[unted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) Inundadon Visible on Aerial hnagery(B7) Other(Explain in Remarks) Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7)(LRR 1� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No �epth(;nches) Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Saturation Present? Yes No X �epth(;nches) Yes X (includes cappillary fringe) No Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:Hydrologic indicators were observed at this location. Vegetation-Use scientific names of plants Montana WDP 4 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum(Plot Sizes:30') Cover Species? StaYus Dominance Test Worksheeh 1 Number of Dominant Species ] (A) 2 That Are OBL,FAC W,or FAC: 3 4 Total Number of Dominant 1 (B) 5 Species Across All Strata: 6 7 Percent of Dominant Species 100% (A/B) Total Co�er 0 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Sapling Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Prevalance Index Worksheet: 1 Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2 OBL species ]00 x 1 = ]00 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 6 UPL species 0 x 5= 0 7 Column Totals: 100 (A) (B) 100 Total Cover 0 Prevalence index=B/A= 1 Absolute% Dominant Indicator Shrub Stratum(30') Cover Species? StaYus Hydrophytic Vegetafion Indicators: 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 X Dominance Test is>50% 3 X Prevalence Index<3.0� 4 Morphological Adaptation�(Provide supporting data) 5 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants� 6 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain) 'J Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 'rotai Co�er 0 Definitions for Four Vegetation Strata: Absolute% Dominant Indicator Herb Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 inches or more 1 Typha latifolia ]00 YES OBL in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of 2 height 3 4 Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines less 5 than 3 inch DBH and greater than 1 meter tall. 6 7 Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless 8 of size,and wood plants less than 1 meter tall. 9 10 Woody vine-All woody vines greater than 1 meter in 1] height. 12 Total Cover 7 00 Absolute% Dominant Indicator woody vine Stratum(30') Cover Species? Status Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 1 2 3 0 0 4 YES NO 5 Total Cover 0 Remarks:(if observed,list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic vegetation was observed at this location. SOIL Profile Desription:(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Montana WDP 4 Matrix Redox Fetures llepth (;nches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type� Loc� Texture Remarks 0-]2 l 0YR 2/] ]00 silty clay loam heavy organics/muck Type:C=Concentradon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Locadon:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matnx Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol(Al) Sandy Redox(SS) 2 cm Muck(A10) Histic Epipedon(A2) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(TF2) Black Histic(A3) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) Depleted Matrix(F3) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl)(LRR O,S) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ��ndicators ofhydrolophytic vegetadon and wetland Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth(inches): Yes X No Remarks:Hydric soil indicators were observed at this location. APPENDIX C: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Norton East Wetland Delineation Photo Log—June 2021 �,��+{�`��,) :S4 � '�a�r � �� r L '��N� a e �, v, � < w s t 4 "�- � �� N� ; ��„ p 9 ,g��N t '. ^� ! e�•�A � ��,'�� '�y�(� ��' ��•j, FY k�� r�t �'�"'�`� 1;� ,'� � �s.'�• �8�t +�'. N J' r�'t� � { '� f r<`� 3 i � � � ' , 1 ,�. e .h �; , Yv :.. t r � r � '��7 R � � �� ' >y�{ iyl�I � .� o��, �: p � s -�, �: � +'�f�'� $ s _ �x �� %� �� Y�i�j 1� �� }I r � f�1 �� / rp` r : T l. J � � �ili�� L ,;�i 1/4t � / � 'F W F t ! y � b' ., � i��' r � a�`��,;k ��'�,�^ �� v �1\ ,�� i �r 1 � '� J /, � �i �+ �;a `i �,'�i,��',�,p � �� .� � 5�� +��i �FR �;L��'ir� � .1]-d �f 'S" �"�'��p r .'� �^ �t �+�� '.�� .}llr�u � �� a � �!�Y r { � !ryD},.� il.i% ��:: � . �a ,� �� 4 � �a^�in �j�� ,�x �T��6' �� 1"�� i� �r. p„a, �..ad.s `;�,` �`\� ,$�� '�: � �,�!�3� r � ��y�, s'; l�,, 5 �, ;�•�� _C� '� `7y� � �a i A�!t � !i � y/� � 1 {,�1. � � �� y/'7y ' , k '� �� .��1 � � ! X { 1'1. ` '��'�� }�•\ �M "�� ' � �'1 � �i�` � k+f �, � t ��a.� ' , . . �� ; ,� , r � `s f.�$�;, � �s ," �,° ��f�r �t�,�'"` 'i� ;� i �t t�I��i�� ti � c r � , � j�\�� '�, �.<rs��9� i.-�� :'Ia� :.� � ��,�� T :.' P�,�`'� � ��. ��v�t �,�� .�.,;� �'� .�� ' !-- w �,�5 L.._'��k�\� 11rn��f �:�� \��;� 3= �f�oe ��_ ��s v �" a`��e �'I�r� �, � i i ��iv 1�' , �to� �,'� ; � �'��'�,. � w�k ' • .t�'��Y't�..-.� . _ � ��- , ..o- �� ,�' .� i : � . tF ' � t. ' Y i v��m'4�s �*;�,��^��. �-=� �, '�, �� ' -�1`��Iif .. �� y � �� ' �,. �j� �� .�� _�`��'`-� S `,'� ; � �i�+;'f�l14�.��'rh'r�a..k'`'�� . _�,�I+.!'�:k.�C�o ts:-�..,..�i Photo 1: Wetland Data Point 1 (WDP1) - ��'" ��'„� A w �x,�. �,� �� k� ��` r b ? �t l�':� �, w � i r � 4,. ,,,� h 1y 4�; x �`� �'�r�� '�h�i r rc �� i rn � � �l s� �( I t 1 a � �:t ,� '�� 'L! �q' ! y� i � ��. ��j � x � � f' ��.�°4*i'i�� i.1 g i'� �� . 5 � t .J T 'v� H„^ t6.� �-`. M Y� �M�� - �� S{� �1 ,.,�� . �� ,�..� � J��''a�e �A(y � �i'�yx. t„ .f. :y��"rl . r+ ., Y �'',�. !�$ � a14e- �r �, . x, 'Y5 4. ^„f ;� �� t'; p %`��, ��T�y ..�,. , !w�* t .'1 ��6"�A �' � 1�„ �'��9p ,1'�4 � i �+}�.g.**h' v�yF}C�"Pi. 1� F . y5$a��.�.4 ''4,.9" �i 1Mi,'[t`f'K+ _ �1 e � '� C��iVk`� � S �Vay��J "� �,� '+�l n`h� y�� 1N 'inj.''�e'��5`,QJ; +24 � �_\� . 'n� : fF'j.�w, �';�¢� � 4� �1 t 1,. , ��,�f� ' ,� � .' � a"�� r7� �"# }��`� ' r $c � � .r i "d'� _ ! ±,� � +, ,.�1 ` �. ,� ` +, � � `� ' a `�f� � ��l. 1 �:� �°4��'``� � �'� ��t�Q-�;� �' r , ,,, tR � � l� rdr �� c,bb `si� X ''«'+:x� =� � i �,/� ' 1J �4 5 ��'l� 1U��' 6�l r p�� .�'t�, •✓!A1�� 7 , '4 a � � ' '�,"��}��ti� A�1� �'i � .' �'- �i � � �f r � y��'�•j �'� �.� '� � �pi 1 _ {� � o.� i t�' 1+ ta�' a�� ' (�' $l i i r1' V i .� �� . �� i� ,r�� 1�3 Z h a��'�` � i'!..�,'�ati, �� f i��b� � ��1� K ,�.�, \ � ��.{� `R.� � � ,� � : �"p� � w e j h ` ��. +� � .. °. �jy � � 1� � `+r y'� f, � �� \ � ��.�.1�' 1. t-.: 4''�� 'a�� e �a��r�: t � '� ti ��i i � x �i�� '', � 'ry ` �`f t r�� '�� z,;�� 't ' s�'�0��1. � �, �r`� n�j� �a ti ';�1�� 1�� ` � `�•- � �2,� �.�� f �u;;4� �- � y" �, ��i C �t� v i�` �c� �\f.0 w, t� '1. �� , .��'+�� ; `a �• I �'� y � '� �( � � �1l'!�, � �\�� 't � �Y�� 'y� �(� " a� tl � ��•�•� • � . .��C �1,�� i,; ��1 17fh�� g� `�� yZ,:`�'�\ '��.; ��, � � '�s,,, ;1�t�y�-, ..�`i �?li 7�� `,i"��i��,.`1\ 1��\'\'aq k%t��` ...��.��'� 'i��'��r '.� `�d%'�� IR`\,�:�', ��.."�i.,'�:S `�Zw l .�.r Photo 2: Upland Data Point 1 (UDP 1) Norton East Wetland Delineation Photo Log—June 2021 _r � I .�..�� ', a � �,�„- "'�m.�,��1F��'�� .M ^d� q �i�� v� ��M�.�� ..�; "� � e �� • � � r�� °7q„`�11,' ��`K ",�� "a svF�,^ .,, -0, ., '� �; '�'. 4.y 41�tt ti 9h' {M „Fj `-€�h : k:,. kut�I. � �'�� a � !tiR M �,,y r, r , „��t�w ,, �F� �r i �, a � b, � `� ��;�1�� `` ��1 'x�TT��_�r! a'1�� i�"�`'r4i1Y6Y �� > �"l�'�^C@.� �t' t �'� i ��y� � o r;� � � G�� ';; �� t`��,&�, ,.� �3�'�' �'�'�� J,; ar��,M1� i y� ��_ � � k �� +R.�� a��'f 4� t ; a}� �� /' �r S� :�++ 1�� ,. ; 'f'�'� i � ,�;�, ,� �� y P S�� y� ... t }� ��, ; ��'4�',�N�� M S� ' .i ��,1� f�1.� 4 l �� ti� ' ��Fw � ?;�`��1� `� .�� t f �(�,�u �� .� ��r'.. ''��'i� �� i,�� M��y '..�'�lt".,� e'�� ,r 1��.� � � � � 4 - vl , 1� ' �. l F� ! � � s �l � �� ,'� ��; �� .�.�� '��.��' �� Y}� r��:�. a��q� ,h i � �� eyt„� �, �g,-�T �_� a��r' 71�' �rr��. a r {� .,� �ii� �'n �;�a.�`�i! �'�� '��p�c�p y� ��t��'��p11��td� ,'��e�'.� '� > f ' " `,�S� /4 �i 1 �+ � J' `�, : � +�Y} g�ey} � Y�6.�,k{ 4�'7.1'"�,�^4 �..'.Y a �q�: "' n d 11 '�'�� t� �, �� 1.:1,'� . :' '� 1f . � �'a,.ar�4t��1 '�'P�yt � s� i'l' , 9'� i '+�e;. �'�?�E . , �� .,8(•4 f v � .. F ,.} F. .t�Pt r1c•' ;�� t�.�f�V'y ..�� ,9� "i11r� �� 4;4 /'�4'd��''� T.�a ��^�"e� .�'�,`��'�' ��'�'�ix�,. ��.ii�� iF, �u�'�n � / �1� (Iy�S,�,"..:: `� � a �'si � �� R�r ��e �"�'�,i � L �y. �Y �:� 1 � y / �� 1�. �,lV..,�V: a'� �:. o �.r,.. _'�l i, �� t48'd��e �� `.'S.f� . r•._. .W7 . _ i..._ '1_A�! t. Photo 3: Stormwater Pond �� .. � -' ..'�,, � � -.j�,y�. _s �'_- . . ,,. ,y^�«.��'; .'^. -.�'.. �s."�. �->„w�i�`��"�'� ,��,� '� . �`'�`-� ► � _ � ��, '"'��' � _-Y`i , , - ��r►. • ' _ti ��.=,� :,. � - - ; .�- --�.�- _ :� ...�_;. . �; _ :�.�.�� _ - �., �` _ ``� -��,�� .-�. J4"`' .�� .�.� , .�� _ ;�, �: , ..�, . . * h; -Z � t_ .. ��, _ � _,''� .: �_ �.-.�� . � l,� . ~ ��:.��"i�� - . ';. . - .� i�� , � , /�:' �t�;._ �" ��` � , t '•'�. _' . y �r . �,� ''E`r _\: ��5� " .r�� .�.. � .[�� ,C' . . . . .. � ._ i . . ., _ Photo 4: Borrow area pond Norton East Wetland Delineation Photo Log—June 2021 �:.. ..� >w».�,..�.� , -�.-�.,�. .,....•�;,�2.. ,__ .,, � I 0 i � F c��a'rf,�' , z_ �� , �; ��..� �� '� '' i , � �� a �l� � � 1�' i V�� r�� l ��f u� e >4 � �y � t �� „�,W>4 � e k i J ,� t i. , �l0 �� i�`y� c�� v� "`�`, ��- ��' : i ti ��,1 �' t .� � � ��/�� r��, '` �;,..�_ �''�r :� , h �� ,�rvr° ��1��\�� "„�� ;�''�" �F : �^�!�' ��';� <<1 k��' �'�� ,-� '. �i 4 � � �,, �t ' i i �'k�s� � ��y�, a.� j �� :�w��. r �z ,�y�, c �, � ,�' i�v�� ,fr � x�, 's_,,ry �n11�� f/ �r� � '�-��'��t� : � . � e�l� � `�! Pr� 1)�� '1 �t . ,�� b v } , � y0 r v �',& i�t+rf r�f�°�� i+��f; '`�+�I�''�'��.@�`�� 'k ��j , �s.�r�y�j' �� . �__``� ��r ��F -�- � � '�i ,' � � � ,��' C � +: �i`�u �� ;4 � "�y�� j o �' � '� F �� s ; � ' 8a��'�� "°. � �P� t I 9`k`-,' � '�,.{ !�� } ,.�. �myi ;.��y� i ��`� � � y �k �It��/ �4�-��.�i� �""`�je��'� I �?��rr�,f� .,K . .�q� �°t° ,=I' p �,�1.p.r �3�t�'��' ._ � ��`�°�'� �'+,��jR'w �� a, 7 �. fl�'Fl:, � , � �'' � ��(� A°� e♦ � '�� `�'� � � � 1�M� �� i ♦i.i'y �w4i`�R� � �� r 1� i / `tal� r �� h� p " ;`a9��,f7° R'��`'y,,( '�.{ � 'i � f ��y;f+y��`�1' .^� ��r�1E+,��p� ��p'��P3 /. � 1 �o jr � � � ��y �ti3u � �r� t ; /�Ip�,f A�' �.� � � �,�PI�! 'ialt�y � f ) 4y fl,.�Al� `y!`{;�,� :�y ' .i�Yr � F� �t k �z � ��a1 � � �� a�t�'.A�`� ,, l�� y � �_ � �✓''� ar"_', � �r �, �I�\�1 � r��i r 4 � c�`��ir!/��'��w11��u �n�� L� r �' ,��y � ,^'..q L ��' G�g �/ �., �,� �`� <�,� $-:Sya��,.,r}s�C� �p --'��'ir �,� A�� -'� � t � `•' i�y � � �� R+f aT �� r'6 �� ;'�,i,�� Nt^ � �t ��d.��'g I �' n'rn��.��?p��i. �� '1 �� ,�'�'�� i p� y., �a.�F'� s'� r��j�,� ��l,�r �1�'�t; `�9�e A�M� �A/ �.,. e M�d �q��1 +et r t�"� � n � � �a( f � G �'.t%'A ��"�C �'!.t,, �f/ I ti� ��t�� '��,?�i�+,.r�"�,�,�+w !f�'�,- �i�� //'�'r`;,� �� ✓„��,..,,� �'�� `..,�,;� � ` 'r��P7 ��((�}I!�+��,/t,1� ��yJ'�� ',tt A�,��v ��y�� + , �4�' ��.��v��`��,,�`'\��4��77i�l'+r�A'��"� r,��r y �d, A� ,, .,� ,/�i` a0;., p ,� 2�1 J� �Jd ��y� .ri��iir't� '�. 6 - �a�''� ;;�� r4'��IY�,'� �pS"��. y � � ♦ . .+ s K r,'<i . ,, � ��,, ��;� ,�I��. i� �, �a-a�, ��-,'�; , ��;�� ,�c . :� ��' %;,� ,�'`��;�f�r, . .�_-_ 4�,,,sr�.-„��.��.. ��, �.� •_�m�� Photo 5: Wetland Data Point 3 (WDP3) � � � r� ..��a- . +�,w 3_�, � � � - �•:� �,�� . � - � r� �� "�_�� ; �, �,�` - � r�� ° �� ;�:� s �` .'� �� ,�� 1�- � � �-,: � � � .�.p ��4 :d'��.��n �� , � ,rh ��` M1 �p � � .�+ nw r�J*� _y�'z�` ..: �A''�v" '�'F. '.�h, . _'t� :_: A� _ f�4:�3.�,� (5Y�y� Iv"u,,4�,�, ._.��,E'e�, �.� �� '1� ,`. �!'? :'d � �R � '°f�� ,��€� -y N '* p � Rr ( � � `1^�,� �� k '�R� b !� a�j �i -��.�S,. � , MI�IMl��.'- r„� .. �; i lv.r� � f � �\ � h � �i�� n�, 4 � /r��' � . y�� .R Gj, �x4� �� '�4.^��fy"�i, i�ft �Nt��r��')�,Y �;t�FSI��. � 4'i .�iJ, n� �0'� ='^ 9N x ':y �.,,�' �.�it� Y'i}g ty ��R .�� ._ `a'f ��+"Y (i¢� ' c� � � .- . �x ,.. `i,�,.4f. . �� .i+ .-< ..� /� .. , -. �.. .�� :.w�.A-� .. � � . � � ..y . _ �Y, _'<5�1c �.A � Photo 6: Wetland complex overview,view south from northern boundary Norton East Wetland Delineation Photo Log—June 2021 A''� .�` .�� I , M, ,-p.'r t' r��%7.4 (� 9 � y y�'� � tl� j D1 ��y5�N��`C .i �`�:�"J�'��y� 4 �i,�.��y'.`�1I ,� �\�d'�I pl� '��J��^f/. :\� .. .`C".�� t\��. �r �C,�y.�`�� '�u�� '}��` �� i��.��`. �,� e �L'� ��4��'�� ,�+ �� `�' �}a�� • �� 7M1. � � ' ,-- �� . � ,_�s m_r� ��-., ; �� !p'� � sta � �� ?e�.\��i.��,��1'F �o�y=.R"��-�' ,i? 4. ' i . ; � d�� `. ��-��\�r>t �4y��r.�rY�. '�'�yh',°� i � � ��"�'��' `��i'f \,�� lf� � � '��r ti'��`y�� •'�,�- �"'�`'��6 � r� j� �I }� }�t?+ , � 90 - w` . ��i ti. t,t! } � �� y f ��'' . ,W �. .. g ?'`�. " ��v: ,��r ,'�ir r�G y `�! !�JI�i�/�?`-:�� .��,�t � ..�� . ,`� ' aS�p�.��hpl `„�'1�!� � + S�. ' s.F: � T ��y«,�" vi � 'c�� ,y '�S� ilc v�� ,p�r ��i��,%� � � y�i P t��lK'.�. at ..��"-a -c � .��. ti d �� ' �� 1�-��r M d `N�� r� �+y�••,�� r�'� :1� q�.Y . .'.Y �..`,��N�iw.. __ !.,' y� . � , '��\ J�R .' �- � —� � 6- l � �\� `� • l�� f , i � � : w .�� „_": � �1 z �� f �� (� �,�'P'i >�_ � +,�b��•�"��CC -_�, �`� y� ` .�r'�i r', ,7 aaP.. � a• ' `:�' �o� ��, �;��', �I O{�r F.,�.,�, ; , � `�'�� , , , .,,,,� �,,, .,� .. � , � r � ��.�. �,�� `�, � 1� .,�� /. 1 ! �� r ^5�. � r,\� ,�+`w�,,,^ �', _ �,/ �j y -, �� j� �` � , , � _ .a � �.'�� L, . "" s� � %� � �'��'�' � -� ,��'��e�. -��,�`1;�� i�•.✓h ;t�{ a' � ��'� :�k � �` � � ' �'/.�y;'�!�►;� t�,};9.�as. \�`ti o, � \_ `a''',�� ;�.eq�,�,��r i �r��i�`��"� .�l,\. � � 1 - �� „p �; r�,9,•,�`'+ �, g��' �r,`�'�� i •%�p.�'�.� y�a,��,. ,-r ,t��,,�� ral�.t _ �`�.,� �•�€.:�� `.'1C� " , __ �, AR�."� Photo 7: Wetland Data Point 4 (WDP 4) �--: � � .3„�-� ,� -r;:< ` ,_,�,,,cs.a"-� : �,.. y�= � � ,..---�� , ,--�-.� �:-�..,.--+��;�-� �...::R�Cc.�r ...� �. x��r.. ns�xF+,aarx svr�w—�.=, -,a.�.. �+�:::: �-� �,,%;. , ,�< ,.. - w , _ �,:. . � , �- � . ��,,.,.. - s,�: .:r.-�.P'°'.t* �i.� r '�. ��tFx""�'iPr�',' _ �...4�� ` n',.�°,' 'W 4 �Y� _..ry' i� . y v G ,, 3 i � 9�,I�lc. � ?a S�*fr 1" aI . AO �i.. `��:•1�.�� .. ;. - �,t��KP�! .'':L,s Yy.�C �. ., t.. +� � � ' . � .F�' � w': -' � �4,as .�. � ,. �.r' � � " � �° +t41 e �. „- � a �..±�, �, < . , ��'r�, �`r tivf �'"d� �''��} w4� •a�� : �. ra r 'r�t 1° y��-� ..t�' �� -. t r ' � ��„'� y '�` �.,��` .n _ Y . � �,.��.� r F . d ,� ��' � ,- �, �� a' .a � r'�'t� .�_�, F `.�ky �i.,�. � _ .;,r :. � a y,��; 9,��' �y`. r, -�' ht�„i+9dr �fcA �<� *'. ^s G- ��,j%� K�. . : .is Yr 6r' S Y . -�. r ^. , )9� � � t � `x�' ., 377�.; � ;� .,i `� '}`' y � ° � $r " � '�� ,,, f � ;�:� � ��,� r,,�, ��,Y� , ��.a � , g'(� Si („ �� .'r � �a x �.r f�.if � r� I -� I a�_ � � �� o .w r .r �, n ' „ ti �^', `� .,w 't'rr'� x �- � f � / 7 ,� ,� �r yk.- f /J � .x. �b ., � � ,.' ,�+�� •Y:��wa 4.�� itj�„z.�~ �R .r ��-,�.e -'l��j" ��'. 9°� .f r �� r �.i ��;''aR.S �`l'r �'- r 't�2' ��N✓f ��` �� ;� v�e ��t �� + :. �%� ,. ,.+. .F. ' � �. b��'�r. �'dy�i� ''�'.��,/i r�a,r�^ �'��9. -��'� S ? r� r'+�p A y.�� `-�y�..� i��/"v•c��i��o��. _ ;�1�i.��T��/�� J�i � [ t1�"� �. "i ✓ � +� ' J� i � v� � ,t1'/- -r. f ,� f�' ., i �. � ,�,•i a. �Br� � / - N . N � � :,t �'4� � f •� � ,!IV vS` il.+' M Cbc- �. � .'/��. C. .�„a �� a/i. �y �k+,��. /!: �°d ti,�irr,�.� _ �� . � _:�.. 1 _ . :s/..��9.a��.�' rx: �y.._ . . .'l�.'� i/� ..t.��!r�.- ,...:�:\�l. _.. Photo 8: Historic ditch infrastructure no longer in use