The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-02-25 CDB Agenda and Packet MaterialsA. Call to Order - 6:00 pm B. Disclosures C. Changes to the Agenda D. Approval of Minutes D.1 Approval of Minutes(Sagstetter) E. Action Items E.1 Zone Map Amendment Requesting Modifying the Zoning Map from PLI to R-3 on 1.37 Acres Plus the Adjacent Right of Way, the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment, Application 25035(Rogers) THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA CDB AGENDA Monday, June 2, 2025 General information about the Community Development Board is available in our Laserfiche repository. If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to comments@bozeman.net or by visiting the Public Comment Page prior to 12:00pm on the day of the meeting. At the direction of the City Commission, anonymous public comments are not distributed to the Board or staff. Public comments will also be accepted in-person and through video conference during the appropriate agenda items. As always, the meeting will be streamed through the Commission's video page and available in the City on cable channel 190. For more information please contact Chris Saunders, csaunders@bozeman.net This meeting will be held both in-person and also using an online video conferencing system. You can join this meeting: Via Video Conference: Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting. Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream, channel 190, or attend in- person United States Toll +1 346 248 7799 Access code: 954 6079 2484 Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all 1 E.2 Continued Discussion of Unified Development Code Update Focusing on Tools to Address Mass and Scale of Buildings(Saunders) F. Public Comments on Non-agenda Items Falling within the Purview and Jurisdiction of the Board G. FYI/Discussions G.1 Upcoming Items for the June 16, 2025, Community Development Board Meeting(Saunders) G.2 Information on Zoning Map Changes Requested as Public Comment During the UDC Update to Date(Saunders) H. Adjournment information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 25035 and move to recommend approval of the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Discuss and determine whether to make a recommendation to the City Commission on methods to address mass and scale of buildings This is the time to comment on any non-agenda matter falling within the scope of the Community Development Board. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public comment relating to that item but you may only speak once per topic. Please note, the Community Development Board cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the Community Development Board shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful of others. Please state your name, and state whether you are a resident of the city or a property owner within the city in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three minutes. General public comments to the Board can be found in their Laserfiche repository folder. Information only, no action required. Receive requested information This board generally meets the first and third Monday of the month from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm. City Board meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, David Arnado, at 406.582.3232. 2 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Sam Sagstetter SUBJECT:Approval of Minutes MEETING DATE:June 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:Approve. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.1 Outreach: Continue to strengthen and innovate in how we deliver information to the community and our partners. BACKGROUND:None. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:Approve with corrections. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Attachments: 051925 CDB Minutes.pdf Report compiled on: May 28, 2025 3 Bozeman Community Development Meeting Minutes, May 19, 2025 Page 1 of 4 THE COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES MAY 19, 2025 Present: Jennifer Madgic, Ben Lloyd, Hap Happel, Nicole Olmstead, Jason Delmue, Mark Egge Excused: Chris Egnatz 00:04:45 General information about the Community Development Board is available in our Laserfiche repository. A) 00:03:52 Call to Order - 6:00 pm B) 00:04:36 Disclosures C) 00:04:40 Changes to the Agenda D) 00:04:46 Approval of Minutes D.1 00:04:53 Approval of Minutes. 050525 CDB Minutes.pdf 00:04:58 Motion to approve Jason Delmue: Motion Ben Lloyd: 2nd 00:05:51 Vote on the Motion to approve The Motion carried 6 - 0. Approve: Jennifer Madgic Ben Lloyd Hap Happel Nicole Olmstead Jason Delmue 4 Bozeman Community Development Meeting Minutes, May 19, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Mark Egge Disapprove: None E) 00:06:04 Special Presentations E.1 00:06:08 Update on the 2025 Montana Legislature Actions Affecting the Update to the Unified Development Code and Existing Regulations 2025 MT Legislative Session - Status.pdf 00:06:33 Community Development Manager Chris Saunders presents to the board. F) 00:26:00 Action Items F.1 00:26:07 Continued Discussion of Unified Development Code Public Input and Alternatives 00:26:10 Community Development Manager Chris Saunders presents to the board with open discussion. 01:24:06 Anja Lincke provides public comment. 01:27:39 Justin Bersick provides public comment. 01:30:21 Miah Gotchee provides public comment 01:32:38 Eva Killenberg provides public comment. 01:38:10 Motion to approve The city undertakes to alter the zone map of Bozeman in connection with the UDC with regard to zone map amendments that meet either of two criteria: 1, these zone map amendments that have already been identified by the city and or set forth on page 2 of the report to us for the City's unintelligible. 2, Other zone map amendments that have been proposed by citizens that are of a technical nature or clearly sensible in the eyes of the community development department and very unlikely to be controversial amongst adjoining neighbors or the city as a whole, but to separate from the UDC and to have delt with pursuant a separate review other potential zone map amendments that did not meet those criteria. Hap Happel: Motion Mark Egge: 2nd 01:55:38 Vote on the Motion to approve The city undertakes to alter the zone map of Bozeman in connection with the UDC with regard to zone map amendments that meet either of two criteria: 1, these zone map amendments that have already been identified by the city and or set forth on page 2 of the report to us for the City's unintelligible. 2, Other zone map amendments that have been proposed by citizens that are of a technical nature or clearly sensible in the eyes of the community development department and very unlikely to be controversial amongst adjoining neighbors or the city as a whole, but 5 Bozeman Community Development Meeting Minutes, May 19, 2025 Page 3 of 4 to separate from the UDC and to have delt with pursuant a separate review other potential zone map amendments that did not meet those criteria. The Motion carried 5 - 1. Approve: Jennifer Madgic Ben Lloyd Hap Happel Nicole Olmstead Mark Egge Disapprove: Jason Delmue 01:57:38 Motion to approve Discuss and determine whether to make a recommendation to the City Commission Hap Happel: Motion Ben Lloyd: 2nd 01:57:40 Vote on the Motion to approve Discuss and determine whether to make a recommendation to the City Commission The Motion carried 6 - 0. Approve: Jennifer Madgic Ben Lloyd Hap Happel Nicole Olmstead Jason Delmue Mark Egge Disapprove: None 02:21:05 Motion to approve Give consideration to 1) the number of dwelling units allowed by right in R- A or whether to rely instead on form based limitations on mass and scale, and 2) to give further consideration to employing square foot caps such as described in the public comment provided by Forward Montana intended to promote efficient land use, provide multimodal transportation options, create more affordable housing, promote the preservation of existing structures, and reuse of existing building materials as replenishing funds for the affordable housing fund. Mark Egge: Motion Jason Delmue: 2nd 6 Bozeman Community Development Meeting Minutes, May 19, 2025 Page 4 of 4 02:25:40 Vote on the Motion to approve Give consideration to 1) the number of dwelling units allowed by right in R-A or whether to rely instead on form based limitations on mass and scale, and 2) to give further consideration to employing square foot caps such as described in the public comment provided by Forward Montana intended to promote efficient land use, provide multimodal transportation options, create more affordable housing, promote the preservation of existing structures, and reuse of existing building materials as replenishing funds for the affordable housing fund. The Motion carried 6 - 0. Approve: Jennifer Madgic Ben Lloyd Hap Happel Nicole Olmstead Jason Delmue Mark Egge Disapprove: None H) 02:31:22 FYI/Discussions H.1 02:31:27 Upcoming Items for the June 2, 2025, Community Development Board Meeting G) 02:34:22 Public Comments on Non-agenda Items Falling within the Purview and Jurisdiction of the Board 02:34:43 Justin Bersick provides public comment. 02:37:18 Natsuki Nakamura provides public comment. I) 02:39:33 Adjournment This board generally meets the first and third Monday of the month from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm. 7 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Director of Community Development SUBJECT:Zone Map Amendment Requesting Modifying the Zoning Map from PLI to R- 3 on 1.37 Acres Plus the Adjacent Right of Way, the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment, Application 25035 MEETING DATE:June 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 25035 and move to recommend approval of the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:Application to rezone a property totaling 1.37 acres, plus adjacent right-of- way, from PLI to R-3 to accommodate proposed development. The subject property is adjacent to the Gallatin County Regional Park. The area was originally annexed in 2001 as the Baxter Meadows Annexation by Resolution No. 3487. The property owner performed a land swap with the County through the Gallatin County Commission to acquire additional land to accommodate their development proposal. The land swap did not go through city review as the city was not an affected landowner. However, the city did review and preliminarily review the subdivision plat for the property. The area of the land swap is zoned PLI and does not allow residential development as a permitted use. Therefore, the property owner seeks to re-zone this area to allow the development to commence. As noted in the application narrative, the subject property has undergone preliminary plat review, see the Park View Crossings Application No. 21158. The application proposed the subdivision of 7 acres of land into 44 residential lots consisting of: 9 fourplex townhouse lots. 2 triplex townhouse 8 lots, and 1 duplex townhouse lot, plus 2 open space (mid-block crossing) lots, 1 common area drainage lot, and streets and rights-of-way (ROW). The Applicant would provide a shared-use pathway along its Vaquero Parkway frontage within the ROW as partial fulfillment of its parkland contribution. Final plat approval has not been granted. The property is not within the NCOD, a historic district, or a city recognized neighborhood. The underlying Future Land Use designation is Urban Residential. The R-3 zoning is an implementing district for this classification. Application materials [external link] are available through the city's website. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no identified conflicts on this application. ALTERNATIVES:1. Recommend to approve the application with contingencies as presented; 2. Recommend to approve the application with modifications to the recommended zoning; 3. Recommend to deny the application based on findings of non- compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Zone Map Amendment. Attachments: 25035 Vaquero Land Swap ZMA CDB SR.pdf Report compiled on: May 21, 2025 9 Page 1 of 31 25035, Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Public Hearing Date(s): Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on June 2, 2025, at 6:00 pm. City Commission meeting is on June 17, 2025, at 6:00 pm. Project Description: The Vaquero Land Swap zone map amendment requests amendment of the City Zoning Map on 1.37 acres (59,514 square feet) plus the adjacent right-of way from PLI (Public Lands and Institutions) to R-3 (Residential Medium Density District). Project Location: The property is located on the west side of Vaquero Parkway at the intersection with Tschache Lane described as a portion of Lot 4A being the component of this ZMA; Being Tract 3A-1 of C.O.S 2202B and Lot 4 of Minor Subdivision 400 located in the Northeast One-Quarter (NE ¼) of Section 3, Township 2 South (T2S), Range 5 East (R5E), P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Meets standards for approval Community Development Board Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 25035 and move to recommend approval of the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Recommended City Commission Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, recommendation of the Zoning Commission, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 25035 and move to approve the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Report Date: May 20, 2025 Staff Contact: Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Agenda Item Type: Action – Legislative 10 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 31 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues None identified at this time. Project Summary The owner, Campeche Shores Development, LLC, Galveston, TX 77552, submitted application to rezone an area totaling 1.37 acres, plus adjacent right-of-way, from PLI to R-3 to accommodate proposed development. The subject property is adjacent to the Gallatin County Regional Park. The area was originally annexed in 2001 as the Baxter Meadows Annexation by Resolution No. 3487 and zoned as R-3. The property owner performed a land swap with the County through the Gallatin County Commission to acquire additional land to accommodate their development proposal. The land swap did not go through city review. However, the city did review and preliminary review the subdivision plat for the property. The area of the land swap is zoned PLI and does not allow residential development as a permitted use. Therefore, the property owner seeks to re-zone this area to allow the development to commence. As noted in the application narrative, the subject property has undergone preliminary plat review, see the Park View Crossings Application No. 21158. The application proposed the subdivision of 7 acres of land into 44 residential lots consisting of: 9 fourplex townhouse lots, two triplex townhouse lots, and 1 duplex townhouse lot, plus 2 open space (mid-block crossing) lots, 1 common area drainage lot, and streets and rights-of-way (ROW). The Applicant would provide a shared-use pathway along its Vaquero Parkway frontage within the ROW as partial fulfillment of its parkland contribution. Final plat approval has not been granted. The property is not within the NCOD, a historic district, or a city recognized neighborhood. The underlying Future Land Use designation is Urban Residential. The R- 3 zoning is an implementing district for this classification. Application materials can be viewed on the City’s development map at the following link. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=296405&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN Community Development Board (Zoning Commission) Summary The Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on June 2, 2025. A summary of the meeting will be provided after the conclusion of the meeting. The video recording of the public hearing is available after the conclusion of the meeting. 11 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 31 No comment has been received as of the production of this report. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with contingencies as presented; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended zoning; 3. Deny the application based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................. 2 Project Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Community Development Board (Zoning Commission) Summary .............................. 2 Alternatives ........................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES........................................................................................................ 4 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT .............. 9 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS............................................... 10 SECTION 4 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ....................... 10 Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria ...................................................................... 11 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ................................................................ 25 APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ......................... 26 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ........................................................... 28 APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING ............................ 29 APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF ...................................... 30 FISCAL EFFECTS .................................................................................................................... 31 ATTACHMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 31 12 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 31 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES Figure 1: Location Map 13 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 31 Figure 2: Location Map 14 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 31 Figure 3: Future Land US Designation 15 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 31 Figure 4: Current Zoning Map 16 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 31 Figure 5: Park View Crossing Preliminary Plat 17 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 31 Figure 6: Rezoning Area Image SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the proposed amendment. Should the application not be approved these contingencies are not required. Recommended Contingencies of Approval: 1. That all documents and exhibits necessary to establish the amended municipal zoning designation of R-3 shall be identified as the “Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment”. 18 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 31 2. The applicant must submit a zone amendment map, titled “Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment”, acceptable to the Director of Public Works, as a PDF which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject property including adjacent rights-of-way, and total acreage of the property. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff found the application meets standards for approval as submitted. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the application. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on this zone map amendment on June 2, 2025, and will forward a recommendation to the City Commission on the zone map amendment. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. in the Commission Room at City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Ave, Bozeman, Montana. The City Commission will hold a public meeting on the zone map amendment on June 17, 2025. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. in the Commission Room at City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Ave, Bozeman, Montana, the City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposed Zone Map Amendment application. SECTION 4 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. A zone map amendment must be in accordance with the growth policy (criteria A) and be designed to secure safety from fire and other dangers (criteria B), promote public health, public safety, and general welfare (criteria C), and facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements (criteria D). Therefore, to approve a zone map amendment the Commission must find Criteria A-D are met. 19 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 31 In addition, the Commission must also consider criteria E - K and may find the zone map amendment to be positive, neutral, or negative with regards to these criteria. To approve the zone map amendment, the Commission must find the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K. In determining whether the criteria are met, Staff considers the entire body of regulations for land development. Standards which prevent or mitigated negative impacts are incorporated throughout the entire municipal code but are principally in Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. Criterion met. The BCP 2020, Chapter 5, p. 73, in the section titled Review Criteria for Zoning Amendments and Their Application, discusses how the various criteria in 76-2- 304 MCA are applied locally. Application of the criteria varies depending on whether an amendment is for the zoning map or for the text of Chapter 38, BMC. The first criterion for a zoning amendment is accordance with a growth policy. Future Land Use Map The proposed amendment is a change to the zoning map. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze compliance with the future land use map. Chapter 3 of the BCP 2020 addresses the future land use map. The introduction to that chapter discusses the importance of the chapter. Following are some excerpts. “Future land use is the community’s fundamental building block. It is an illustration of the City’s desired outcome to accommodate the complex and diverse needs of its residents.” “The land use map sets generalized expectations for what goes where in the community. Each category has its own descriptions. Understanding the future land use map is not possible without understanding the category descriptions.” The area of this application is within the anticipated growth area of the city. As shown on the maps in Section 1, on the excerpt of the current future land use map, the property is designated as Urban Neighborhood. The Urban Neighborhood designation description reads: “This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density 20 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 31 due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcels sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed-use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car.” The correlation between the future land use map of the growth policy and the zoning districts is presented in Table 4 of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020. As shown in the following Correlation with Zoning Table excerpt, the R-3 district is an implementing district of the Urban Neighborhood. In finding that this application meets criterion A, the analysis is cognizant that in many planning efforts and discussions over the decades, the Community Development Board and City Commission have considered the various elements of the question of to grow or not grow and the consequences of either approach. After considering this question, they have concluded that having growth within the physical boundaries of Bozeman results in better outcomes than not. Therefore, the BCP 2020 approaches growth as something that overall is positive but recognizes that it does not come without drawbacks and that the community will change over time. Goals and Policies A zoning amendment is also evaluated against the goals and policies of the BCP 2020. Most of the goals and policies are not applicable to this application. Relevant goals and objectives have been identified by staff. Conflict with the text of the growth policy hasn’t been identified. The Short-Term Action list on page 63 of the BCP 2020 describes 14 items to implement the growth policy. The first two relate to direct changes to the zoning map in support of 21 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 31 listed goals and objectives. These include increasing the intensity of zoning districts in already developed areas. Beginning on page 71 of the BCP 2020 in the section titled Zoning Amendment Review, the document discusses how the City implements zoning for new areas, amendments to areas, and revisions to existing text. This section includes a discussion of when the City may initiate a zoning change to a more intensive district to increase development opportunities. This section demonstrates that the City, as a matter of policy, is supportive of more intensive zoning districts and development, even within already developed areas. This policy approach does not specify any individual district but does lean towards the more intensive portion of the zoning district spectrum. With individual property owner request to modify zoning, the applicant has the burden of proof to show the proposed amendment is in the city’s best interest and furthers more goals and policies of the BCP, 2020 than hinders. The applicant’s argument simply makes a declarative statement that the zoning is accordance with the growth policy because, “Properties in the surrounding area are similarly zoned and the City of Bozeman has multiple areas throughout the city designated as R-3, including the other/existing piece of this same parcel. The proposed zoning will provide for a variety of housing types and land uses, and follows the goal of an urban-scale development with a diverse mixture of possible uses. The properties anticipated development pattern is in accordance with many objectives of community planning. This includes promoting residential mixed-use developments.” Staff did not identify goals and objectives the proposed amendment is in direct conflict with. To aid the Zoning Commission and City Commission to make affirmative findings in support of the application staff offers additional analysis for consideration. THEME 2 | GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIONS Goal N-1: Support well-planned, walkable neighborhoods. N-1.1 Promote housing diversity, including missing middle housing. Comment: The R-3 district allows a variety of housing types and lot sizes which can promote the construction of desired housing type in the city. N-1.10 Increase connectivity between parks and neighborhoods through continued trail and sidewalk development. Prioritize closing gaps within the network. Comment: Revising the zoning map will encourage the completion of the proposed subdivision. City standards require connectivity and the construction of facilities that promote this objective. 22 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 31 Goal N-2: Pursue simultaneous emergence of commercial nodes and residential development through diverse mechanisms in appropriate locations. N-2.2 Revise the zoning map to support higher intensity residential districts near schools, services, and transportation. Comment: The map will extend the R-3 zone to the extent of the preliminary approved subdivision. The R-3 zone is a considered a moderate density district and is near schools, is on existing transportation system, and some commercial destinations are nearby such as La Tinga Mexican. Also, the City is planning for additional commercial activity at the corner of Baxter and Davis. In conclusion, the R-3 zoning designation is in accordance with the growth policy. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Criterion met. The subject property is currently served by City of Bozeman Fire and Police Departments. Future development of the property will be required to conform to all City of Bozeman public safety, building, transportation, and land use requirements, which will generally ensure this criterion is met. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 18.02 International Fire code Adopt standards for fire prevention and control Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Site plan and building permit 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.400.010 Streets, general Access for emergency services Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan. 38.410.090 Fire protection requirements Development design Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Subdivision, site plan, and building permit C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. 23 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 15 of 31 Criterion met. City development standards included in Chapter 38, Unified Development Code, building codes, and engineering standards all ensure that this criterion is met. Adequate water and sewer supply and conveyance provide for public health through clean water. Rapid and effective emergency response provides for public safety. The City’s standards ensure that adequate services are provided prior to building construction which advances this criterion. General welfare has been evaluated during the adoption of Chapter 38 and found to be advanced by the adopted standards. Provision of parks, control of storm water, and other features of the City’s development standards also advance the general welfare. The subject property is connected to the City’s transportation system and is served by fully constructed intersections and streets in the immediate vicinity. Sidewalks are mostly constructed except for portions adjacent to County owned property adjacent to the Regional Park. Future development will require transportation facilities within the approval area. Development on site will require any improvements not installed to mitigate impacts and meet the city’s complete street policies. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 18.02 International Fire code Adopt standards for fire prevention and control Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Site plan and building permit 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.410.070 Municipal water, sewer systems Location and requirement to install. Sewer collection facilities plan, Water facilities plan Subdivision or site plan. 38.410.090 Fire protection requirements Development design Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Subdivision, Site plan, and building permit 38.420 Parks Standards for location, type, and development of parks and trails Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Subdivision or site plan review 24 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 16 of 31 38.5 Project Design Site layouts, landscaping, building configuration, signs, lighting Site plan and building permit D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements. Criterion met. The City conducts extensive planning for municipal transportation, water, sewer, parks, sustainability, and other facilities and services provided by the City. The adopted plans allow the City to consider existing conditions; and identify enhancements needed to provide service to new development. See page 19 of the BCP 2020 for a listing. The City implements these plans through its capital improvements program (CIP). The CIP identifies individual projects, project construction scheduling, and financing of construction for infrastructure. Private development must demonstrate compliance with standards prior to construction. Dedication of school facilities is not required by municipal zoning standards. However, School District 7 will have opportunity to review and comment on future development. Section 38.300.020.C, BMC, states that the designation of a zoning district does not guarantee approval of new development until the City verifies the availability of needed infrastructure. All zoning districts in Bozeman enable a wide range of uses and intensities. At time of future subdivision or site plan review the need for individual services can be more precisely determined. No subdivision or site plan is approved without demonstration of adequate capacity. 38.300.020.C, “Placement of any given zoning district on an area depicted on the zoning map indicates a judgment on the part of the city that the range of uses allowed within that district are generally acceptable in that location. It is not a guarantee of approval for any given use prior to the completion of the appropriate review procedure and compliance with all the applicable requirements and development standards of this chapter and other applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a guarantee of immediate infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the city to bear the cost of extending services.” Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 25 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 17 of 31 18.02 International Fire code Adopt standards for fire prevention and control Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Site plan and building permit 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.410.060 Easements Location and form of easements for utilities Transportation Master Plan, Sewer collection facilities plan, Water facilities plan Annexation for collector and arterial streets. Subdivision or site plan for all others. 38.410.070 Municipal water, sewer systems Location and requirement to install. Sewer collection facilities plan, Water facilities plan Subdivision or site plan. 38.410.090 Fire protection requirements Development design Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Subdivision, site plan, and building permit 38.420 Parks Standards for location, type, and development of parks and trails Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Subdivision or site plan Water and sewer are available to the site. There is an existing 8-inch poly vinyl chloride sewer line on the eastern side of the property within the Vaquero right-of-way. An 8-inch ductile iron water main is also located in the Vaquero right-of-way. It is likely future development will increase impacts on services, adequate capacity is presently available to meet expected demand. E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Criterion met. This criterion is not about individual preferences for a given degree of visual openness but about preservation of public health. The R-3 district provides adequate light and air through the Bozeman Unified Development Code’s standards for 26 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 18 of 31 park and recreation requirements, on-site open space for residential uses, maximum building height, lot coverage, and setback requirements. The form and intensity standards, Division 38.320, provide minimum lot areas, lot widths, lot coverage and maximum floor area ratios, and prescribe require minimum separation from property lines and limits building heights. Section 38.520.030 requires building placement to ensure access to light and air. Division 38.420 and Section 38.520.060 require dedication of parks and on-site open spaces to meet needs of residents. The standards provide a reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Zone edge transitions do not apply to this property if the R-3 is approved pursuant to section 38.320.060, BMC. In addition to the zoning standards, adopted building codes contain more detailed requirements for air circulation, window placement, and building separation that further ensure the intent of this criterion is satisfied. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan review, building permit 38.420 Parks Standards for location, type, and development of parks and trails Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.520.060 On-site residential and commercial open space Private land open area requirements Site plan F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. Criterion met. Potential future development within a zoning district of R-3 will affect the City’s motorized and non-motorized transportation system with potential increased traffic and vehicle trips along Vaquero Parkway and the intersections Vaquero and Davis and Baxter Lanes. Both Baxter ad Davis Lanes are designated Minor Arterial streets pursuant to the Bozeman Transportation Master Plan while Vaquero Parkway is a local street. Due to the small size potential impacts will be limited and therefore can be accommodated by the existing street network. 27 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 19 of 31 The proposed zoning may increase trip generation than the existing PLI zoning. The City’s transportation plan is used to evaluate transportation needs over the long term throughout the City and will evaluate impacts of motorized vehicles along with bikes and pedestrians. The parks and trails plan also examine and specify options for extensions of the existing trail network through this site. Future site development will examine impacts in greater detail on the transportation network, parks, and trails system, and municipal facilities when specific construction has been identified. Furthermore, these future development reviews will ensure that development under the new zoning will comply with the City’s standards for the provision of onsite parking for bicycles and vehicles, as well as the requirements for onsite circulation. This application is unique because the property has undergone preliminary plat review and expected traffic is known prior to the zone change. The city has requirements that, upon future development, traffic impacts will be studied by the development team to demonstrate compliance with the City’s long-range transportation plans. Future project development will ensure compliance with the acceptable traffic limits identified in the transportation plans, as well as provide for the dedication of rights of way, construction or reconstruction of streets and trails, payment of impact fees, and other contributions as will be applicable to this project. A traffic impact summary was provided with the preliminary plat application and found that the infrastructure that exists and is proposed for the project would adequately service the development, and no upgrades were proposed for any nearby intersections. The subject properties are within the City’s land use, transportation, parks, and utility planning areas. Those plans show this property as developing within the City when development is proposed. Prior to final plat approval for the Park View Crossing subdivision, all required infrastructure requirements will be improvised or financially guaranteed as allowed by the city. Future development and redevelopment of the property will be required to comply with transportation-related standards and reviewed for impacts on the surrounding streets, intersections, and sidewalks, and improvements to the transportation network to serve the site, which will improve the overall transportation system. These improvements include provisions for non-motorized transportation systems. Therefore, the change in zoning district will have a minimal effect on required road improvements, pedestrian or bicycle facilities, or similar compliance with standards. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 28 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 20 of 31 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.410.060 Easements Location and form of easements for utilities Transportation Master Plan, Annexation for collector and arterial streets. Subdivision or site plan for all others. 38.420.110 Recreation Pathways Location and requirement to install. Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Annexation for Class 1 Trails easement. Subdivision or site plan for all else. The site has a Walk Score of 13, a Transit score of 22, and a Bike Score of 38. According to Walk Score® the walks score measures the walkability of any address based on the distance to nearby places and pedestrian friendliness. Almost all errands require a car. 90 – 100 Walker’s Paradise. Daily errands do not require a car. 70 – 89 Very Walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot. 50 – 69 Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot. 25 – 49 Car-Dependent. Most errands require a car. 0 – 24 Car-Dependent. Almost all errands require a car. These values are provided by Walk Score, a private organization which presents information on real estate and transportation through walkscore.com. The algorithm which produces these numbers is proprietary. A score is not an indication of safety or continuity of services or routes. Scores are influenced by proximity of housing, transit, and services and expected ability, as determined by the algorithm, to meet basic needs without using a car. Sites located on the edge of the community have lower scores than those in the center of the community as the area is still under development and therefore diversity of uses is less than in fully established areas. There are no adopted development standards relating to the walk score. G. Promotion of compatible urban growth. 29 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 21 of 31 Criterion met. The Bozeman Community Plan establishes a preferred and compatible development pattern. “The land use map sets generalized expectations for what goes where in the community… The land use categories and descriptions provide a guide for appropriate development and redevelopment locations for civic, residential, commercial, industrial, and other uses. The future land use designations are important because they aim to further the vision and goals of the City through promoting sustainability, citizen and visitor safety, and a high quality of life that will shape Bozeman’s future.” (Community Plan p. 51). The City’s future land use map designates the properties as Urban Residential. These designations correlate with several zoning districts including the R-3 district proposed by the applicants. The districts were developed by the City to promote appropriate urban growth compatible with the areas of the City as identified on the future land use map. Based on the land use map designations and correlated zoning districts in the plan and proposed by the applicants, the zone map amendment would promote compatible urban growth. Also see the discussion in (H) below. The subject property is bounded by existing R-3 to the east and bounds the Regional Park bounds the property to the west, south, and north. The applicant responds to this criterion by stating, “Yes, the Bozeman Community Plan established preferred development patterns. This development is consistent with this plan and matches many of the existing and proposed zoned areas surrounding this proposed project site.” Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.310 Permitted Uses What can be done where in the city. Growth policy Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320.060 Zone Edge Transitions Height adjustments on the edge of some zones Site plan 38.340 Overlay District Standards Historic preservation SOI Standards for Historic Preservation, Site plan and building permit 30 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 22 of 31 Design Guidelines for Historic Preservation 38.5 Project Design Site layouts, landscaping, building configuration, signs, lighting Site plan and building permit H. Character of the district. Criterion met. Section 76-2-302, MCA says “…legislative body may divide the municipality into districts of the number, shape, and area as are considered best suited to carry out the purposes [promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community] of this part.” Emphasis added. This proposal amends the zoning map and not the text. Therefore, no element of this amendment modifies the standards of any zoning district. The character of the districts as created by those standards remains intact. As noted above, the City Commission has latitude in considering the geographical extents of a zoning district. It is not expected that zoning freeze the character of an area in perpetuity. Rather, it provides a structured method to consider changes to the character. This is especially true when applying zoning to undeveloped areas as any new construction will alter the physical characteristics of the area. The City has defined compatible development as: “The use of land and the construction and use of structures which is in harmony with adjoining development, existing neighborhoods, and the goals and objectives of the city's adopted growth policy. Elements of compatible development include, but are not limited to, variety of architectural design; rhythm of architectural elements; scale; intensity; materials; building siting; lot and building size; hours of operation; and integration with existing community systems including water and sewer services, natural elements in the area, motorized and non-motorized transportation, and open spaces and parks. Compatible development does not require uniformity or monotony of architectural or site design, density or use.” The City has adopted many standards to identify and avoid or mitigate demonstrable negative impacts of development. These will support the ability of future development in [R-3] to be compatible with adjacent development and consistent with the residential and commercial character of the area. 31 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 23 of 31 The intent of the R-3 residential medium density district is to provide for the development of one- to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. This purpose is accomplished by: 1. Providing for minimum lot sizes in developed areas consistent with the established development patterns while providing greater flexibility for clustering lots and mixing housing types in newly developed areas. 2. Providing for a variety of housing types, including single household dwellings, two to four household dwellings, and townhouses to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of non-residential uses. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas with good access to parks, community services and/or transit. The city has adopted many standards to identify and avoid or mitigate demonstrable negative impacts of development. These will support the ability of future development in the proposed R-3 district to be compatible with the proposed adjacent park use and other R-3 residential areas. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.310 Permitted Uses What can be done where in the city. Growth policy Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320.060 Zone Edge Transitions Height adjustments on the edge of some zones Site plan 38.340 Overlay District Standards Historic preservation SOI Standards for Historic Preservation, Design Guidelines for Historic Preservation Site plan and building permit 32 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 24 of 31 38.5 Project Design Site layouts, landscaping, building configuration, signs, lighting Site plan and building permit I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Criterion met. Future uses for construction on the site will be residential. The dominate land use in the general areas is R-3 residential and Park. There is an evolving commercial node north and across Baxter Lane and the Gallatin County Regional Park bounds the property on the west side. Adding residential area in this location will increase park utilization and requires the construction of a street adjacent to the park which the County has chosen not to install. City standards require public streets on 100 percent of park frontage to create access and parking for users. The proposed development will add a section of missing street frontage to the park. The future land use designation shows the area and the land to the east as Urban Residential. The R-3 is an implementing district for the Urban Neighborhood classification. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.310 Permitted Uses What can be done where in the city. Growth policy Subdivision, site plan review, building permit 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan review, building permit 38.600 Natural Resource Protection Protect watercourses and wetlands FEMA Floodplain study Subdivision, site plan review, building permit J. Conserving the value of buildings. Criterion met. The site is vacant. R-3 zoning allow for a variety of residential structure types and for similar land use patterns and will thus conserve the value of buildings in the area. Any future development on the property will be subject to standards in the R-3 zoning district which will ensure the conservation of adjacent building values including 33 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 25 of 31 but not limited to standards set forth in the Unified Development Code for fire safety, setbacks, buffers and building heights, which will help alleviate any potential negative impacts to the values of adjacent buildings as a result of future development on the subject property. The values of some buildings may improve in the future as new and improved amenities are provided to the area as the site is developed according to the proposed R-3 district, while other buildings’ values are unlikely to be impacted largely due to a robust real estate market and lack of unmitigated offensive uses allowed by the proposed zoning district. Therefore, this criterion is met. K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Criterion met. As stated above, the BCP 2020 illustrates the most appropriate use of the land through the future land use map. This application complies with the BCP 2020 by proposing zone map amendments of districts that continue to implement the future land use map designations. In this case, urban residential development has been identified by the community as the most appropriate types of development for the property. The Unified Development Code contains standards, protections, and review processes to ensure the land is developed in ways that are appropriate to a site’s context and according to the BCP 2020. Similarly, as stated by the applicant, “The Bozeman Community Plan shows the most appropriate use of land. Zoning this property as R-3 is the most appropriate type of development for this property to be able to maximize the residential mixed-use towards the integration of multi-household residential within the City.” PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO- THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s) of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, 34 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 26 of 31 a sufficient protest must: (i) contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the protest is lodged; and (ii) contain a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including listing all owners of the property and the physical address and legal description of the property), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of property affected by the action. Signers are encouraged to print their names after their signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to final action by the City Commission. Protests must be delivered to the Bozeman City Clerk, 121 North Rouse Ave., PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The owner, Campeche Shores Development, LLC, Galveston, TX 77552, submitted application to rezone a property totaling 1.37 acres, plus adjacent right-of-way, from PLI to R-3 to accommodate proposed development. The subject property is adjacent to the Gallatin County Regional Park. The area was originally annexed in 2001 as the Baxter Meadows Annexation by Resolution No. 3487. The property was originally annexed and zoned R-3 in 2001. The Regional Park was purchased in 2002 as the 100-acre park with Open Space bond funds and zoned with a master plan for the park adopted in 2007. A portion of the park was intended to serve as the new YMCA site. However, the YMCA chose to locate their new facility at the corner of Baxter and Love. The location of this zone map amendment is the proposed location of the YMCA. See the image below. Shortly after the zoning map was revised to show a portion of the PLI as R-3 zoning. Subsequently, the zoning map was revised to refine the extent and precise location of the R-3 zoning through application Z-07011. The result is shown on the current zoning map in Section one of this report. 2007 the property was subdivided into four (4) lots as Minor Subdivision 400. Lot 4, the subject property, was subject to further review prior to development. In 2012, The Crossing at Baxter Meadows (Application P-12017), was platted creating the lots to east of Vaquero Parkway. 35 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 27 of 31 Finally, the subject property has undergone preliminary plat review, see the Park View Crossings Application No. 21158. The application proposed the subdivision of 7 acres of land into 44 residential lots consisting of: 9 fourplex townhouse lots. 2 triplex townhouse lots, and 1 duplex townhouse lot, plus 2 open space (mid-block crossing) lots, 1 common area drainage lot, and streets and rights-of-way (ROW). The Applicant would provide a shared-use pathway along its Vaquero Parkway frontage within the ROW as partial fulfillment of its parkland contribution. Final plat approval has not been granted. The location of the land swap necessitated the land swap to realize the developer plans. Therefore, the property owner performed a land swap with the County through the Gallatin County Commission to acquire additional land to accommodate their development proposal. The land swap did not go through city review. The area of the land swap is zoned PLI and does not allow residential development as a permitted use. Therefore, the property owner seeks to re-zone this area to allow the development to commence. The property is not within the NCOD, a historic district, or a city recognized neighborhood. The underlying Future Land Use designation is Urban Residential. The R- 3 zoning is an implementing district for this classification. 36 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 28 of 31 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was sent via US first class mail to all owners of property located inside the site and within 200 feet of the perimeter of the site. The project site was posted with a copy of the notice. The notice was published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on May 10 and 17, 2025. The Community Development Board acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission hearing is scheduled for June 2, 2025, and the City Commission public hearing is scheduled for June 17, 2025. No comment has been received as of the date of the production of this report. 37 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 29 of 31 APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as Urban Neighborhood in the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 future land use map – see descriptions below. URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD. This category primarily includes urban density homes in a variety of types, shapes, sizes, and intensities. Large areas of any single type of housing are discouraged. In limited instances, an area may develop at a lower gross density due to site constraints and/or natural features such as floodplains or steep slopes. Complementary uses such as parks, home-based occupations, fire stations, churches, schools, and some neighborhood-serving commerce provide activity centers for community gathering and services. The Urban Neighborhood designation indicates that development is expected to occur within municipal boundaries. This may require annexation prior to development. Applying a zoning district to specific parcels sets the required and allowed density. Higher density residential areas are encouraged to be, but are not required or restricted to, proximity to commercial mixed-use areas to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities without requiring the use of a car. Proposed Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The applicant has requested zoning of R-3, “Residential Moderate Density” in association with the annexation of the property. According to Sec. 38.300.100(C) of the Unified Development Code, “The intent of the R-3 residential medium density district is to provide for the development of one- to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. This purpose is accomplished by: (1) providing for minimum lot sizes in developed areas consistent with the established development patterns while providing greater flexibility for clustering lots and mixing housing types in newly developed areas and (2) providing for a variety of housing types, including single household dwellings, two to four household dwellings, and townhouses to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of non-residential uses. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas with good access to parks, community services and/or transit. 38 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 30 of 31 The Zoning Correlation Table on Page 58 of the Bozeman Community Plan, 2020 correlates zoning districts with the Growth Policy’s land use categories, demonstrating that the proposed zoning designation of R-3 correlates with the Growth Policy’s future land use designation of “Urban Neighborhood”. Authorized uses in Residential districts are detailed in section 38.310.030. APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Campeche Shores Development, LLC, Box 3088, Galveston, TX 77552 Applicant: Campeche Shores Development, LLC, Box 3088, Galveston, TX 77552 Representative: Hyalite Engineers, PLLC, 2304 N 7th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Tom Rogers, Senior Planner 39 25035 Staff Report for the Vaquero Land Swap Zone Map Amendment Page 31 of 31 FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this zone map amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. In addition, application materials can be viewed on the City’s development map at the following link. https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=296405&dbid=0&repo=BOZEMAN 40 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Community Development Director SUBJECT:Continued Discussion of Unified Development Code Update Focusing on Tools to Address Mass and Scale of Buildings MEETING DATE:June 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:Discuss and determine whether to make a recommendation to the City Commission on methods to address mass and scale of buildings STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:At the May 5th meeting, the Board packet materials identified some of the primary issues identified in public comments received during the recently completed supplemental public engagement. The mass and scale of buildings was a common theme in the comments. The Board requested that the staff schedule discussions for the Board on topics relating to the code update during regular meetings of the Board. The first was on May 19th to discuss how to approach requested amendments to the zoning map. The topic for this meeting is zoning tools used to address mass and scale of buildings. The attached memo describes each tool, identifies which are presently in use, and if they are proposed to continue in the new draft. The focus of this discussion is not the specifics such as "X feet" setback but rather the general tools. Duplicative tools create additional complexity in the code with limited benefit. Omission can result in unwanted outcomes. Each tool has advantage and drawbacks. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:Determination of recommendation to City Commission. ALTERNATIVES:As determined by the Board. FISCAL EFFECTS:No budgeted funds are expended with this discussion. 41 Attachments: CDB June 2 2025 Mass and Scale Memo.pdf Report compiled on: May 29, 2025 42 Report To: Community Development Board From: Tom Rogers, Senior Planner Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Community Development Director Subject: Unified Development Code (UDC) Update – Building Mass and Scale Tools Meeting Date: June 2, 2025 General Background The City completed supplementary public engagement on the draft UDC update in May. The staff reported to the Board on the outcomes of that engagement. The City Commission continues their consideration of the issue. Compiled outcomes from the Phase II engagement materials: a. Phase 2 workshop notes – 6 workshops, 2 online and 4 in person held b. Phase 2 board summary – 6 advisory boards, continuation of process c. Phase 2 presentation survey report and individual responses – Concluded May 8th, addressed more specific questions related to earlier comments and consider tradeoffs in priorities. Survey report filtered by Owners and Survey report filtered by Renters. d. Phase 2 chat toolkit report – 7 persons submitted chat reports on 20 topic responses. This project is the first time the City has tried using this engagement tool. One response also includes a survey that is different from the questions the City asked with the Phase 2 survey. The Community Development Board expressed a desire to continue discussion on elements in the UDC update while the Commission continues its work. Building mass and scale were common areas of public comment. This discussion is an opportunity for the Board to consider the tools used in the UDC update draft to address these issues. The desire to control the built environment (mass, scale, height) for a particular outcome is not new. The first purpose of zoning in the United States was to control bulk in places like New York and Chicago. The purpose has evolved with time. As has the justification for adopting zoning regulations. 43 2 The first use of basic zoning was to address very real social, environmental, and health issues. A seminal text written in 1890 that was nationally influential in encouraging a more deliberate management of community change illustrates the need for balancing capital with community. Jacob Riis, How the Other Half Lives” [External Link] provides a stark and vivid portrayal of how communities have evolved, how the built environment needs to respond to changing conditions, and the need and evolution of the police power to regulate land use. As building codes and other regulations have changed to address some issues the need for zoning to also address those issues has decreased. Balancing the desire of incremental development and redevelopment with meeting the needs for housing for existing and relocated individuals is fraught with challenges. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020 (BCP2020) [External Link] includes seven themes. Realizing each outcome tends to create tension between competing outcomes.  A resilient city  A city of unique neighborhoods  A city bolstered by downtown and complementary districts  A city influenced by our natural environment, parks, and open lands  A city that prioritizes accessibility and mobility choices  A city powered by its creative, innovative, and entrepreneurial economy  A city engaged in regional coordination The BCP2020 address the fundamental tensions of growth. How do we maintain and respect exiting developed areas and the people who live here and accommodate those who wish to join the community. Chapter One addresses “To Grow or Not to Grow” and “Does the City Have to Grow.” It also addresses implementation “The City must balance many issues in approving urban development. Therefore, it is not unusual if there is some tension between competing priorities, even if there is no explicit contradiction of policy.” p. 73 The city is proactive in addressing the need for housing for all residents. Numerous goals and objectives of the BCP2020 focus attention on housing as does the Community Housing Action Plan. Anticipating the Code Update the city performed a code assessment to identify possible changes that could improve the Unified Development Code (UDC), zoning map, and development review processes to both maintain needed standards and outcomes, and remove regulatory barriers to the creation of affordable housing [Unified Development Code Affordable Housing Assessment]. Changes to form and intensity standards are discussed beginning on page 23. The draft UDC is implementing many recommendations from the report. Resources describing concepts to control the built environment are very wide ranging. These controls all have pros and cons depending on the context being employed and the community’s desired outcome, or what the community hopes to achieve by a particular set of regulations. 44 3 As a foundation and to help standardize terminology two generally accepted resources as the foundation of the City of Bozeman’s language is the “Planning and Urban Design Standards” by the American Planning Association and the “Complete Illustrated Book of Development Definitions” by Moskowitz, et. Al. The meaning of specific terms is also influenced by State and Federal definitions and the context and cultural influences of the location they are employed. This nuance is explored in detail in both resources. A variety of tools are available to control the size and proportions of a structure and its relationship to adjacent properties. Most zoning codes employ more than one and must be considered wholistically to work and are steeped in the context of the community. What works in one community may not achieve another’s desired outcome. These zoning standards impact land efficiency, housing stock, and costs. • Height: Maximum building height to maintain similarity between buildings. • Lot Setbacks: Required distances between a building and property lines, roads, or other structures. • Floor Area Ratio (FAR): A ratio of a building’s total floor area to the size of its lot, which helps control density and scale. • Lot Coverage: The percentage of the surface of a lot that can be covered by buildings, ensuring open space for landscaping, recreation, or other non-building uses. Tangentiality, any requirements that add impervious surfaces, such as sidewalks, porches, and mandated driveway widths can be viewed as a bulk control when excessive lot coverage requirements are in place. • Width/size: A limitation on the maximum building width to the street or overall total area. • Elevation Design Requirements: Ratios, formulas, or specific measurements requiring the street-facing front elevation of a home based on certain conditions, such as a garage. Bozeman’s development code uses all these tools to varying degree in residential, commercial, and industrial zones. See Division 38.320 [external link] for the current form and intensity standards (setbacks, height, lot area, etc.) and Division 38.530 [external link] for building detailing standards. To review the same topics in the current draft of the updated UDC [external link] see Article 2 and the individual descriptions of each district and Division 38.520. Many elements from the existing Division 38.530 have been merged into the individual district descriptions under the updated draft. The UDC is a primary implementation tool of the Growth Policy or Community Plan. With each revision of the growth policy, the city initiated edits to the code to realize the community’s desires. State law requires regulations to be in accordance with the adopted growth policy. The current draft of the UDC being considered today is a result of this effort. We have heard though public comment, open houses, survey’s, workshops, and public meetings the community is concerned about the impacts of the community’s growth and in particular the size and scale of new individual residential buildings and multi-unit 45 4 buildings. The current and proposed bulk and scale standards are of keen interest. All recent development was reviewed by the existing development code which some have found incongruent with their desires. Others found the outcomes desirable. The draft code evolves these standards and proposes a different approach to mitigate impacts. Zoning codes generally fall into two types: Euclidian and form-based zoning. Euclidean zoning is the separation of land uses by type—residential, commercial, retail, industrial, etc. —each into their own zones or areas within a given city and subject to standards for those districts. Form-Based Code (FBC) is a means of regulating land development to achieve a specific urban form. The primary focus is on form rather than use as with a Euclidian approach but does not ignore uses. There are pros and cons to both approaches. Most communities, like Bozeman, employ a hybrid approach by utilizing a combination of Euclidian and form-based concepts to achieve the desired outcome. The draft code relies more on FBC than the existing code. See example provided below, Exhibit A. No one standard adequately addresses all the concerns of the community or the characteristics of construction. The following graphic helps illustrate the way these concepts work together. Each identified subject (illustrated by a colored circle) allows for a range of actions or sets a standard. A project must meet each of the regulations. Only where a proposed project can meet all of the standards may it be approved (illustrated by the orange shape). Each standard helps to constrain the potential for excess in other standards. This interplay has been recognized for a long time as is shown in the discussion on floor area ratios in a report from the Planning Advisory Service, American Society of Planning Officials, Information Report No. 111, June 1958 [External Link]. When considering how these standards work together it is important to remember and consider the range of uses that will be subject to the standard. If only homes are considered then a different outcome may acceptable than the schools, churches, daycares, and other activities are also allowed in a residential zoning district are part of the consideration. 46 5 Floor Area Ratio Floor Area Ratio is a tool that cities can use to control building size and density, but it can also have a profound impact on housing availability and affordability. While FAR intends to maintain a city’s character for overall massing of buildings and ensure orderly development, strict regulations can stifle much-needed housing production, especially with redevelopment opportunities within in-demand communities. A description of Floor Area Ratio from Wikipedia, “Floor area ratio (FAR) is the ratio of a building's total floor area (gross floor area) to the size of the piece of land upon which it is built. It is often used as one of the regulations in city planning along with the building-to- land ratio. The terms can also refer to limits imposed on such a ratio through zoning. FAR includes all floor areas but is indifferent to their spatial distribution on the lot whereas the building coverage ratio (or lot coverage) measures building footprint on the lot but is indifferent to building height.” What is considered an acceptable FAR varies widely by location. Analysis in the 2009 community plan evaluated land development for non-residential development which showed that new development in the B-3 district in 2007 had a mean FAR of 3.58 while overall in the city the mean was 0.99. Bozeman only implemented FAR for housing as a standard in 2018 with varying values by zoning district. The UDC in effect today uses FAR in all residential districts except R-5 and RMH. Existing height, setbacks, and open areas requirements renders FAR often less relevant for managing the scale of residential structures. As a solution the draft UDC suggests a more 47 6 functional tool with wall plate height. This tool limits structure height on small lots and mitigates the impact a new larger structure might have on adjacent properties by limiting the vertical wall adjacent to neighboring property(ies). Only the UMU district includes a FAR in the commercial and industrial zones. The UMU district is deleted in the updated code. There are no FAR’s proposed in the draft UDC due to the strongly variable relationship between existing conditions and any FAR. For example, the area along Lindley Place has a pattern of smaller homes while the area near Cooper Park has a greater proportion of larger homes, and the area near Alder Creek Park a still greater proportion of larger homes and all three areas are currently zoned as R-2. Identifying an FAR that is properly proportionate to all conditions in a zone both built and yet to be built is difficult. The draft UDC employs substantially more robust transitions and step back program to mitigate impacts to adjacent zoning districts of lesser intensity. Review of the efficacy and utility of FAR throughout the United States reveals mixed results and general consensus that strict FAR standards tend to limit housing flexibility (types of homes), housing supply (increasing number of units), and increase cost because of few units. The Growth Policy addresses each of these potential issues by encouraging the opposite. However, FAR remains a tool to manage bulk and scale of new buildings. Building Height Residential The allowed maximum varies by roof pitch and district in the current UDC. Roof pitches and maximum heights have changed numerous times over the past 25 years. Maximum height as a fixed number in practical design is influenced by slope of the site such as the area along Kenyon Drive or S. Tracy by Longfellow School. Varies by district in draft UDC. Regulated by combination of number of floors and maximum floor height permitted in district. The addition of wall plate as described below helps limit immediate impact on adjacent properties in less intensive districts. Shifting to stories rather than fixed number of feet allows for a greater variety of roof forms and does not penalize certain architectural styles like the International Style exemplified by this 1940’s home at Babcock and S 7th that don’t use pitched roofs. 48 7 Commercial/Industrial Varies by roof pitch and district in current UDC. Not all districts include roof pitch as a component. Specified height number is often subject to a variety of allowed encroachments and exceptions. Varies by district in draft UDC. Regulated by number of stories permitted in district and maximum height per story. Maximum story height varies by district to accommodate the different expectations of operations in each. Setbacks Setbacks establish minimum distances from a property line to the outer walls of buildings, most commonly to provide adequate sidewalk space on streets, provide emergency access, give access throughout a site, and to avoid conflicts with adjacent structures. Setbacks may also be instituted to allow access to public utilities buried below ground, or for protection of nearby environmental assets like wetlands, and provide recreation space in residential zones. Residential Zones Setbacks are consistent by district in current code. Setbacks are currently subject to numerous allowed encroachments. Setbacks may have some differences by use. For example, a townhome which shares a wall with the adjacent property has a different side setback for the wall that is shared than the wall that is not shared. Standards for the REMU district are quite different than the other residential districts. 49 8 The proposed front and rear setbacks are lessened in front and back, but encroachments are no longer allowed. This simplifies the code and makes it simpler to understand. In the proposed code there are some differences by district to help distinguish the districts from each other. Commercial/Industrial Non-residential districts, existing and proposed, have greater variation due to the differences in function and needs of users in the districts. Districts like the proposed B3-C are strongly representative of the existing construction in the area while B2-M is more often seen in areas with unbuilt sites or areas being redeveloped. Maximum Building Size/Width Residential Zones There is no set maximum building size in the current UDC, with two exceptions; Apartment buildings, limited, has a maximum size limit in the R-3 zone. The R-2 and R-3 districts also has a limitation on the number of townhomes or rowhomes that can be constructed in a single group. A single home, staying within the setbacks and other standards of a district may be built to a numerically unlimited size. Section 38.530.040 does apply standards on variation of the façade to visually lessen the appearance of a long wall but does not have a specific limited distance. The proposed code identifies a maximum building size by square footage and maximum building width for residential districts. These standards differ by district. R-A and R-B have building size limits. All residential districts have width limits with RMH having the smallest of the allowed width sizes and R-D the greatest. Commercial/Industrial Zones Section 38.530.040 of the current code applies standards on variation of the façade to visually lessen the appearance of a long wall but does not have a specific maximum wall length. Functionally, the City’s standards for maximum block length require streets at certain intervals and limit building size. However, depending on local conditions block lengths can be quite long. The proposed code does establish a maximum building width standard which varies by district from 125 to 250 feet in commercial districts and some industrial districts. Section 38.260.110 provides additional details on how the standard is applied. Story (floor) Height Residential Zones There are no story height minimums or maximums in residential districts in the current UDC. A single-story building can be built to the maximum height allowed in the district. 50 9 Minimum and maximum story (floor to floor) heights is proposed in the draft UDC. This is responsive to expressed community concern on scale of redeveloping areas and provides additional design flexibility in greenfield development. Additional information on interpretation of the standard is provided in 38.260.130 of the updated draft UDC. Commercial/Industrial Zones Minimum story (floor) height varies by district, use of building, and Block Frontage designation in the existing code. Minimum floor heights do not apply in industrial zones. Minimum and maximum story (floor) heights apply to all stories in the draft UDC. In 2020, Ordinance 2062 established a minimum 15’ for commercial use height requirement for ground floors in commercial districts to provide the ability to adapt spaces as tenants in building change out. This minimum standard did not apply to subsequent floors. The standard measures from floor-to-floor surface and allows for a variety of support structures and utilities which vary by building and user. The ordinance resolved conflicts between code sections and the NCOD Chapter 4B guidelines. Functional minimum floor to floor heights on upper floors vary by the type of uses such as residential or office. The draft of the updated UDC leveraged the existing standard to set an upper limit cap to how far a designer can stretch the size of a “story” and constrain maximum size of a building. The transition to stories rather than a fixed height was suggested with the Downtown Improvement Plan adopted in 2019. The new approach intends to constrain maximum height of a building without creating fixed uniformity or monotony of height. One of the elements people find favorable about Main Street is the variation in building heights even when the same number of stories are present as shown in the photo below. 51 10 Image source: Google Streetview Wall Plate The wall plate option is a new alternative to address massing, especially in less intensively developed areas. Wall plate limits the maximum height of an exterior wall to prevent “looming” from one site to another. From the UDC Update Project Web Site: “Note: This part of the code was an area of significant interest in public comment received to date. Changes related to this part of the draft code may result from upcoming engagement efforts. Edits are not included in the draft released on Oct 29, 2024.” Definitions and rules of interpretation will help explain terms used in the document. Wall plate is described in Sec. 38.260.100.B on page 2-108. Story height is detailed in multiple locations including in each zoning district’s building standards and in Sec. 38.260.130.A and B. of the update draft. The combination of wall plate to constrain building wall size and number and size of stories provide flexibility for the designer and some predictability for adjacent owners. Wall plate is a response to public concern on scale of development, especially in existing lower intensity areas experiencing redevelopment. More intensive zoning districts may not have a wall plate limitation to allow them to have the taller buildings that are intended in those districts. Wall plate height for the R-A district is currently at 25 feet. This means the wall must not exceed that height uninterrupted. If people have a basement or raised foundation that additional height will limit how tall each story above can be in order stay inside the overall wall plate height. 52 11 Example of the REMU District – 38.220.070.A60.B.4, excerpt of dimensional standards below. (page 2-31) • Maximum of 5 stories • First floor is 15 feet • Upper floor height of 15 feet • Maximum of 75 feet The Wall Plate approach to mitigating large imposing buildings is a direct result of the limits from the Bozeman’s experience utilizing FAR for the same. Scaling the wall plate height (25-feet) to approximately 2 stories with a small allowance for the foundation and grade balances the need to generate housing stock, allowing individual property owners the ability to appropriately utilize their property, and mitigate potential impacts on 53 12 adjacent property. Required setbacks improve the efficacy of the well plate maximum to ensure adequate view, sunlight, and space is provided. Step Backs & Planes Step-backs refer to step-like recessions in the profile of a building and are often used as outdoor terraces in both residential and commercial buildings. Initially used as a method of maximizing the height of masonry structures, architectural step-backs in modern day applications are usually implemented for practical purposes such as the preservation of sunlight on neighboring structures, yards, sidewalks, or parks. With step-back ordinances, structures are allowed to rise straight-up a certain number of stories beyond which they are subject to step-backs away from the initial façade that follow a prescribed method to establish the step back. Extent of step backs in height and depth may vary by district. Bozeman currently uses an inclined plane, of 45° to establish the boundary of required step backs. Other methods measure from a different set of beginning points, but in all cases the building must refrain from piercing the resulting sky exposure plane. In the current code, step backs are only applied at zone edge transitions. The updated draft changes the method of determining step back from an angled plane to a direct standard of a number of stories up and specified minimum distance back from the façade. The updated draft increases the number of circumstances in which step backs are required, see 38.360.070 beginning on page 2-97 of the draft. Step backs are applied at more than just district boundaries in the updated draft such as in the B3C district. Image from City of Toronto 54 13 Staff will present visuals at the meeting to assist in the understanding of regulating mass and scale tools as they relate to the draft code. The city has also prepared a resource to help people compare the existing and proposed form and intensity standards for each district. This resource is available on Engage Bozeman [external link]. Transitions Transitions are a special case for mass and scale controls as they typically only apply at district edges. Their applicability may vary depending on other decisions made regarding mass and scale control tools. They will be considered separately in a future discussion. 55 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Community Development Director SUBJECT:Upcoming Items for the June 16, 2025, Community Development Board Meeting MEETING DATE:June 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:Information only, no action required. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:The following items are presently scheduled for review at the June 16, 2025, Community Development Board meeting: 1. Application 24570 [External link], 5211 Baxter Lane Annexation Zone Map Amendment. Considered in the role of the Zoning Commission. 2. Application 24626 [External link], Gallatin Center Zone Map Amendment. Considered in the role of the Zoning Commission. 3. Continued discussion of the UDC update, application 21381. Considered in the role of the Planning Commission. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:None. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Report compiled on: May 14, 2025 56 Memorandum REPORT TO:Community Development Board FROM:Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Community Development Director SUBJECT:Information on Zoning Map Changes Requested as Public Comment During the UDC Update to Date MEETING DATE:June 2, 2025 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:Receive requested information STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:During a recent Board meeting members of the Community Development Board requested information on public comments to date requesting changes to the zoning map on specific parcels. Staff has compiled a list of these requests which is attached. All such requests are included in the public comment archive for the UDC update and are available to the public through the City's website [external link]. Comments are added several times a week as the City Clerks receive and process public comments. This is information only and no action on any individual request will be taken at this time. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:None. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Attachments: UDC Zoning Public Requests as of 5-29-2025.pdf Report compiled on: May 29, 2025 57 2025 comment folder (multiple years for comment in folder by year) https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=295388&dbid=0&repo=BOZE MAN Known Map Request: Single or Multiple Site Split Zone or Other Correction Requested Change in Zone https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=278590&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Single Yes RA/R4 https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280553&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Single No RC to RD (new designations) https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280270&dbid=0&repo=boz eman&cr=1 Single No NEHMU to B2M https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280570&dbid=0&repo=boz eman Multiple No RA to RB https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280912&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Single No RC to RD (new designations) https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280911&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Single No RA to RC https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=280931&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Multiple No RA to REMU and B2M https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=296563&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Single No RMH to R5 https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=298793&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Multiple No M1 to B2M https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=298600&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Multiple No RC to RA (new designations) https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=299049&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Multiple No RC to RA (new designations) https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=299463&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Multiple No Various to NEHMU https://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=299715&dbid=0&repo=BOZ EMAN Multiple Yes/No Various 58