Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03 Evergoods INF Responses Informal Plan Review Comments CHECKLIST - Evergoods REFERENCE NUMBER COMMENTTYPE REVIEWED BY DESCRIPTION NOTES RESPONSE CD Technician Missing owner signature on Development ReviewApplication. Please upload the notification letterwith the Responded by: Doug Minarik- 12/4/24 10:48 AM Sam Sagstetter owner's signature obtained.The notification letter was sent to the applicant's email the day the application a signed notification letter has been uploaded to 1 12/3/24 8:51 AM was submitted. Please check your spam folder if you do not find it in your inbox. the document folder Checklist Item Solid Waste SLD Waste See added sheet A2.84-Trash Enclosure-MA 2 Russell Ward 1. need detailed plans for refuse enclosure.2.refuse enclosure will need to be covered. Changemark 12/6/24 2:11 PM Addressing An address of 2214 Iron Horse Road has been assigned to Lot 2A of Glen Lake Commerce Subdivision. If Noted Jenny Connelley additional buildings are added,additional addresses would need to be assigned. 3 12/9/2410:01 AM Comment Water and Sewer W/S Existing Water services Division You will need to terminate any existing water services at the main if they are not used in this project. 4 Nick Pericich 12/19/24 3:11 PM Noted,all existing water services that will not Changemark be used will be terminated at the main. Fire Department Peryour question#3,Yes Manley Road assists in compliance with 2021 IFC Fire Apparatus Access Roads Dimension 150'parking lot run depths on site plans Sheet A1.00-Site Plan has noted the travel Scott Mueller code requirements specifying access to any portion of the building within 150 feet. Please note,this where applicable. distances in within the parking lot are less than 12/23/24 2:28 PM compliance is not the same as dead end roads that require a turnaround. Proposed site plan will require a fire 150'to each deadend.-MA apparatus turnaround due to internal length of drive access to NE side over 150 feet from entrance off Iron Horse.2021 International Fire Code:APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SECTION D101 GENERAL D101.1 Scope. Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with this appendix and all other applicable requirements of the International Fire Code.SECTION D102 REQUIRED ACCESS D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt,concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing up to 75,000 pounds(34 050 kg).SECTION D103 MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant.Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road,the minimum road width shall be 26 feet(7925 mm), 5 exclusive of shoulders(see Figure D103.1). D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade. Exception:Grades steeper than 10 percent as approved by the fire code official. D103.3 Turning radius.The minimum turning radius shall be determined by the fire code official. D103.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet(45 720 mm)shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4.TABLE D103.4 REQUIREMENTS FOR DEAD-END FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS LENGTH(feet)WIDTH(feet)TURNAROUNDS REQUIRED 0-150 20 None required 151-500 20 120-foot Hammerhead,60-foot"Y"or 96-foot diameter cul-de-sac in accordance with Figure D103.1 501-750 26 120-foot Hammerhead,60-foot"Y"or 96-foot diameter cul-de-sac in accordance with Figure D103.10ver 750 Special approval required For SI: 1 foot=304.8 mm. Comment Engineering BMC 38.220.080.A.2.g(2)—Site plan submittal requirements—Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a Those adjacent streets/topo components are 6 Alicia Paz-Solis distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to major arterial streets where the distances must be 200 feet. shown.-HE 12/23/24 4:11 PM Comment Engineering DSSP Section I.D—Please show existing and proposed utilities,including line size and material where All existing utilities,etc that were located with Alicia Paz-Solis appropriate;water lines(main lines and service lines),valves,and hydrants;sewer lines(main lines,and the design survey are shown on the existing 7 12/23/244:11 PM service lines)and manholes;storm sewer lines, manholes,and inlets. conditions sheet.-HE Comment Engineering BMC 38.410.130—Water Adequacy—The development will need to satisfy the water adequacy code MA has provided fixture count to E1. E1 to privide flow CILWR will be paid/coordinated prior to final Alicia Paz-Solis requirement prior to a future site plan approval. If sufficient water rights cant be provided to offsets the rate for HE to calculate sewer and water service sizing. site plan approval. 12/23/24 4:13 PM development's annual demand then a cash-in-lieu of water rights(CILWR)payment will be required.The City assesses the CILWR fee at a rate of$6,000 per acre-foot.The fee determination will take place during the site plan review, however if there are any questions or if a preliminary review is desired please contact Griffin Nielsen with the Engineering/Utilities Department directly at or(406)582-2279.The City encourages the use of groundwater wells to supply irrigation demands,which in turn will reduce the CILWR fee.Applicant must obtain a pre-determination from the DNRC demonstrating that a well groundwater 8 well may be permitted under Montanas exempt appropriation or that provide the water right documentation if existing prior to finalization of the CILWR fee determination. Finally,the City would like to make the owner aware of an available CILWR rebate of approximately 20%for residential units if high-efficiency fixtures (toilets,washers,and shower heads)meeting the City Water Conservation Division standards are installed. The rebate would be released at occupancy and requires an agreement defining the terms and amount rebate be finalized and executed prior to final plan approval. If the owner is interested or has any questions please reach out to Griffin Nielsen. Comment Engineering BMC 38.270.030.C—Completion time for site development—Provision of municipal central water noted-MA Alicia Paz-Solis distribution, municipal sanitary sewer collection systems,streets,and stormwater systems means that the 12/23/24 4:14 PM criteria in either subsection a or subsections b and c are met.All improvements must be installed prior to the 9 issuance of a building permit(pursuant to the criteria established in subsection a)for any building within the site,except when concurrent construction is an identified purpose of the initial project review and approved pursuant to the criteria established in subsection b and c of this section. Comment Engineering DSSP Plans and Specifications Review Policy A—Plans,specifications,and submittals for public noted-MA Noted,a fire service line application will be Alicia Paz-Solis infrastructure improvements includingfire service lines must be submitted to the City Engineering submitted separately.-HE 10 12/23/24 4:14 PM Department through the engineering ProjectDox Portal(https://www.bozeman.net/services/development- Comment center)for infrastructure review. Engineering DSSP Section 11.B.1—Storm Drainage Plan—A Storm Drainage Plan shall include a map or plat showing The stormwater plan and applicable Alicia Paz-Solis building site(s),open areas,drainage ways,ditches,culverts, bridges,storm sewers,inlets,storage ponds, calculations/figures are inlcuded within the 12/23/24 4:14 PM roads,streets,and any other drainage improvements.The map shall also include identification and square engineering report submittal.-HE foot coverage of the various ground surfaces(i.e.vegetation,gravel,pavement,structures). 11 If stormwater runoff generated from the proposed development was accounted for within the Glen lake Commerce Subdivision Management Plan,the applicant must confirm this is the case and verify current standards will be met for the proposed development as part of the format site plan submittal. Comment Engineering DSSP Section II A.4—The applicant must include a storm drainage plan with post-construction storm water Noted,please see the provided engineering Alicia Paz-Solis management controls that are designed to infiltrate,evapotranspire,and/or capture for reuse the post- report.-HE 12 12/23/24 4:15 PM construction runoff generated from the first 0.5 inches of rainfall from a 24-hour storm preceded by 48 hours Comment of no measurable precipitation. Engineering DSSP Section II C—The applicant must provide on-site detention with release rates limited to predevelopment Noted,please see the provided engineering Alicia Paz-Solis runoff rates.Retention ponds must be sized based on a 10-year,2-hour storm intensity. report.-HE 14 12/23/24 4:38 PM Comment Engineering Montana Post Construction Storm Water BMP Design Manual—The proposed project is located in an area that Final geotech report has been received and sent to HE& Alicia Paz-Solis is known to have seasonally high groundwater.The applicant must demonstrate that seasonal high FSLA 12/23/24 4:43 PM groundwaterwill not impact the function or maintenance of the proposed facilities. Industry guidance Per the geotech report received for this 15 recommends a three-foot minimum separation from the bottom of the proposed facility to the underlying property,there was no evidence of groundwater groundwater table.The applicant must provide local seasonal high groundwater elevations to support the on site therefore no seasonally high Comment proposed design. groundwaterwas designed for.-HE Engineering DSSP Section V.A.6.h—Services—The Water Superintendent may require the termination of any existing This comment pairs with comment#4. Alicia Paz-Solis service stubs(either for domestic or fire service)that are not utilized for service upon the development of the 12/23/24 4:53 PM lot. Lines to be terminated shall be capped or plugged at the main,and any curb boxes or valve boxes on the line shall be removed. 16 Any water or sewer service that enters the lot that will not be used will need to be terminated.Sewer can be terminated near the property line or at the sewer main.Water must be terminated at the main in the street. Comment Water On June 15th,2024,Ordinance 2155 and Resolution 5586 were adopted by the Bozeman City Commission as Noted by FSLA on 1/10. Conservation well as the associated City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual. Division Projects not deemed"adequate"by June 15,2024 are now subject to these new code requirements.To 17 Eric Neustrup familiarize yourself with these requirements please visit 12/27/243:18 PM https://www.bozeman.net/departments/utilities/water-conservation/new-development-standards-3620. Comment Transportation Change the terminology used on"03_A1.00 Architectural Site Plan"from"Bike Path"to"Existing Shared Use Noted by FSLA on 1/10. Candace Mastel Path"along Manley Road. Because of the active transportation frequenting this corridor this path should 18 12/30/241:12 PM remain accessible to users during construction. Terminology has been changed on all relevent Comment sheets.-MA Engineering BMC 38.410.070, DSSP Section V.A&V.B—Water&Sewer Demand—Prior to a determination of adequacy, Alicia Paz-Solis the applicant must provide an estimate of the peak-hour sanitary sewer demand as well as the average and 12/31/24 4:44 PM max day demands of domestic water usage for the proposed site development. 19 •A professional engineer must certify the estimates. • Please include relevant Glen Lake Commerce Subdivision Water&Sewer Design Report information/excerpts. Noted,please see the provided engineering Comment report.-HE Engineering BMC 38.400.010—Streets,general—Dead-end streets must comply with city design specifications and Dimension 150'parking lot run depths on site plans Alicia Paz-Solis standards,and with any city-adopted International Fire Code. No dead-end streets longer than 150 feet are where applicable. 1/2/2510:54 AM permitted without an approved turn-around.Where streets terminate,the developer must provide a cul-de- sac at the terminus.Where it is planned that a dead-end street will be extended in the future,a temporary cul- 20 de-sac must be provided.All approved turnarounds must be signed as no parking. 1."T"turnarounds,in-lieu of temporary culs-de-sac,must be specifically approved by the review authority. "T"turnarounds must include two straight backup lengths of 45 feet each to accommodate city fire trucks.All other design requirements are established by the review authority The parking layout was updated such that no leg of the lot was over the 150' length,therefore Comment no turnaround is necessary.-HE Engineering BMC 38.540.020.M—Snow removal storage areas—Snow removal storage areas must be provided sufficient FSLA and HE to coordinate locations. Alicia Paz-Solis to store snow accumulation on site.Such areas may not cause unsafe ingress/egress to the parking areas, 1/2/25 3:14 PM may not cause snow to be deposited on public rights-of-way,may not include areas provided for required parking access and spaces,and may not be placed in such a manner as to damage landscaping.All snow 22 removal storage areas must be located and designed such that the resultant stormwater runoff is directed into landscaped retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as required bythe engineering department,or in compliance with the storm drainage provisions of chapter 40 article 4,and/or best practices manual. Snow removal/storage areas have been shown, Comment please see sheet C1.0.-HE Engineering BMC 38.520.040.C.3—Non-motorized circulation and design—Crosswalks are required when a walkway FSLA to discuss design options for graphic/material FSLA has shown a crosswalk in the same Alicia Paz-Solis crosses an on-site paved area accessible to vehicles.Crosswalks must contain contrasting material(such as notation of the crosswalk on the groundplane. concrete material as the pedestrian walkways, 23 1/2/25 3:39 PM concrete)and/or patterns(such as stamped asphalt),excluding painted surfaces. with the adidtion of painted striping;see landscape materials plan.-FSLA Comment Engineering BMC 38.400.100—Street vision triangle—No fence,wall,or planting in excess of 30 inches above the street FSLA will follow these guidelines;can HE help diagram Alicia Paz-Solis centerline grades is permitted within a street vision triangle.The applicant must show the street vision the site vistion triangles? FSLA has shown street vision triangle at the Iron 24 1/3/2511:35 AM triangles for all street intersections and accesses. Please show the street vision triangle in the site plan. Horse entrance;see landscape materials plan.- Comment FSLA Engineering BMC 38.220.080.2.g(12)—Site plan submittal requirements—Provision for handicapped accessibility, The ADA compliant parking and associated 25 Alicia Paz-Solis including,but not limited to,wheelchair ramps,parking spaces,handrails and curb cuts, including route is shown within the Civil plan set.-HE Comment 1/3/2511:47 AM construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance. Engineering BMC 38.220.080.A.2.g—Traffic Generation—The applicant must submit a peak hour trip generation value to The peak hour trip generation comparison is 26 Alicia Paz-Solis the City to determine whether a traffic impact study is required. included with the engineering submittal.-HE Comment 1/3/25 11:59 AM Engineering Plat Note—Environmental Assessment—The new Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(Terracon Project MA to find report and file for future Site Plan submission Alicia Paz-Solis No.26237008,dated luly 17,2023)resolves the plat note condition placed on the subdivision,which states, 1/3/25 2:24 PM "All Current and future property owners are advised of the potential environmental hazards identified in the Environmental Site Assessment(Terracon Project No.AJ167008&A1167011)and the associated declaration 27 of covenants conditions and restrictions." The City Documents and Staff Reports folder contains a copy of the new report. Please include this report with future site plan applications. See included Environemtnal Site Accessment Comment report.-MA Engineering COB MODS—Non-Residential DrivewayApproach—Forthe non-residential driveway approach, please referto HE has confirmed with city that Connected Goods Alicia Paz-Solis COB STD DWG N0.02529-12. driveway approach is further north than our site and 28 1/3/25 3:07 PM cannot be aligned to. Per the previous discussion with Alicia,this The proposed approach should line up with the existing approach across Iron Horse Rd (Connected Goods). approach is no longer a concern as it sits north Comment of the project site.-HE Engineering BMC 38.400.090.D.2—Access—Table 38.400.090-1 provides the minimum distance between public and/or Access spacing should not be an issue since there is only Alicia Paz-Solis private accesses and intersections and the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and one public access location. 29 1/8/25 9:10 AM other public and/or private accesses Per the previous discussion with Alicia,this • Full access spacing located on local streets(Iron Horse Rd)is 40 feet. approach is no longer a concern as it sits north Comment • Partial access spacing on local streets is also 40 feet. of the project site.-HE Parks Department Commercial project. No park and recreation requirements. Noted. 30 RossKnapper 1/9/2510:02 AM Comment Planning In response to applicant question#6,applicants are required to complete either the concept review process Noted. 31 Bailey Minnich or an informal review.You do not need to complete both processes. Comment 1/9/25 2:02 PM Planning BMC 38.510.030.G Other blockfrontage standards,building entrances.Where buildings are set backfrom the Proposed Landscape plan includes pedestrian FSLA has shown a pedestrian connection from Bailey Minnich street, pedestrian connections are required from the sidewalk.The submitted site plan delineates a connection to Ironhorse.ARCH and CIVIL to coordinate Iron Horse to the building entrace;see 1/9/25 2:02 PM pedestrian connection from the primary entrance to the shared use path along Manley. However, no landscape materials plan.-FSLA 32 pedestrian connection is shown connecting the primary entrance to Iron Horse Road which is also designated as Other block frontage. Please provide pedestrian connections to the primary entrance from both street Comment frontages. Planning BMC 38.510.030.G Other block frontage standards.There are no parking lot location restrictions,except that a Noted by FSLA on 1/10. FSLA is showing a 13' planted area between the Bailey Minnich 10' buffer of landscaping between the street and off street parking areas meeting the performance standards parking lot and the sidewalk on Iron Horse. 1/9/25 2:02 PM of division 38.550 of this division is required.The submitted site plan does not delineate the required 10-feet There is another 9.5' planted area between the 33 wide landscaping buffer between the proposed parking lot and Iron Horse Road. Please provide a landscaping sidwalk and Iron Horse.See landscape planting plan with the formal application submittal demonstrating compliance with the applicable block frontage plans.-FSLA requirements. Comment Planning BMC 38.520.040.C.3 Non-motorized circulation and design, Internal circulation.Crosswalks are required Noted by FSLA on 1/10;see response on Comment 23. FSLA has shown a crosswalk in the same Bailey Minnich when a walkway crosses an on-site paved area accessible to vehicles.Crosswalks must contain contrasting concrete material as the pedestrian walkways, 1/9/25 2:02 PM material(such as concrete)and/or patterns(such as stamped asphalt),excluding painted surfaces. If the with the adidtion of painted striping;see 34 required pedestrian connection from the primary building entrance to Iron Horse Road extends through the landscape materials plan.-FSLA proposed parking lot,a crosswalkwould be required identifyingthe pedestrian connection. Comment Planning BMC 38.520.070. Location and design of service areas and mechanical equipment.The applicant must MA to confirm screening requirements for wall At the proposed roof top mechancal zone, Bailey Minnich provide adequate service area and mechanical equipment screeningthat meets the requirements of this meters/equiptment,and confirm dimensions of roof top perforated metal screening has been provided 1/9/25 2:03 PM section with the formal submittal.This includes any ground,roof top,or wall mounted mechanical equipment, screening are adequate. that exceeds the height of all roof top mounted utility meters,and solid waste enclosures. mechancial equiptment.At the ground 35 elevation, landscape screening has been provided at the wall mounted electrical equiptment.-MA Comment Planning BMC 38.520.070.B.3 Location of ground related service areas and mechanical equipment.Service areas must FSLA will develop screening planting per code to block FSLA is showing landscape screening between Bailey Minnich not be visible from the sidewalk and adjacent properties.Where the review authority finds that the only option the enclosure from view. the trash enclosure,the adjacent property,and 1/9/25 2:03 PM for locating a service area is an area visible from a public right-of-way,internal pathway or pedestrian area,or Iron Horse. Screening planting is also shown in from an adjacent property,the area must be screened with structural and landscaping screening measures Per Energy 1,all electrical equipment must maintain front of the electrical meter and CT cabinet 36 provided in subsection C below and division 38.550.The proposed trash enclosure shown on the Architectural working clearance in accordance with NEC 110.26.This (mounted to the facade left of the person door Site Plan is visible from Iron Horse Road and must be screened as required in subsection C of this section. working clearance can be met with an enclosure that at the shop entry).See landscape planting plan. Please provide applicable screening per BMC 38.520.070.0 with the formal application submittal. does not impede on the clearance when the doors to the -FSLA Comment enclosure/screaning are opened. Planning BMC 38.530.020.D. Building Design,applicability and compliance.The review authority may waive or relax MA to include letter explaining waiver. MA to reference See waiver letter provided in Documents folder. Bailey Minnich these provisions in the industrial zones depending on the type of use, number of anticipated employees and BMC 38.530. Fa�ade is 20'over at 170'without a major MA 1/9/25 2:03 PM customers,and the site's physical context.The greater number of employees and/or customers and higher break. visibility levels warrant a greater application of building design standards.The proposed building exceeds the maximum fa�ade width permitted under BMC 38.350.040.E and includes areas on the south and west 37 elevations which meet the definition of blankwall.As this project is proposed within the M-1 Industrial zoning district,it is eligible for a waiver to the requirements of BMC 38.530 Building Design. Please include this request within the formal submittal application or comply with the applicable standards. Comment Planning BMC 38.530.060.C.2.a Metal Siding. Metal siding must be a minimum 24 gauge thickness. Re-purposed metal MA to only specify metal siding that meets Bailey Minnich siding is exempt from minimum thickness requirements provided its material integrity is intact. Please provide design criteria set by code section BMC 38 1/9/25 2:03 PM additional information with the formal submittal documenting the proposed metal siding shown on the 38.530.060.C.2.a-MA Comment elevations complies with this requirement. Planning BMC 38.540.050.A.2 Number of parking spaces required, non-residential uses.The number of spaces shown MA has privided an updated parking calculation on cover MA has privided an updated parking calculation Bailey Minnich in Table 38.540.050-3 must be provided subject to the adjustments allowed by this division 38.540.The sheet. HE&FSLA have coordinated parking layout. on cover sheet G0.00-MA 1/9/25 2:04 PM proposed use of Office requires a minimum of 1 parking space per 250 square feet of floor area.According to BMC 38.540.010.A.1,the term"floor area,"for the purpose of calculatingthe number of off-street parking 39 spaces required, means 85 percent of the gross floor area. Based on the proposed size of the building,85%of the gross floor area would require a minimum of 48 parking spaces.While the current proposed parking lot appears to comply with the required number of spaces at this time, please provide updated parking calculations with the formal application submittal. Comment Planning BMC 38.550.050. Mandatory landscaping provisions.The formal submittal must include a compliant Noted by FSLA on 1/10. FSLA has provided a compliant landscape Bailey Minnich landscaping plan that meets the requirements of this section,includingthe use of drought tolerant species, concept; please referto landscape materials 40 1/9/25 2:04 PM screening, parking lot landscaping,street frontage landscaping,and irrigation. Landscape plans must include and planting plans. Irrigation plans are not yet the information required by section 38.220.100. finalized and are forthcoming.-FSLA Comment Planning BMC 38.550.050.B.2. Parking lot landscaping.All surface parking lots on the building site must be landscaped Noted by FSLA on 1/10. FSLA has proivded a landscape planting plan Bailey Minnich in accordance with this subsection. Please provide a landscaping plan with the formal submittal identifying indicating parking lot screening,canopy trees, 41 1/9/25 2:04 PM the required parking lot screening,canopy trees,and parking lot landscape area as the proposed parking lot and parking lot landscape areas.See landscape will contain more than 15 parking spaces. planting plan.-FSLA Comment Planning BMC 38.550.050.D.1.Street frontage landscaping required. Except in R-S districts,all street rights-of-way Noted by FSLA on 1/10. Bailey Minnich contiguous to or within the proposed development site not used for street pavement,curbs,gutters, 1/9/25 2:04 PM sidewalks or drive aisles must be landscaped,as defined in this chapter,and must include one large canopy FSLA has indicated one large canopy tree for tree for each 50 feet of total street frontage rounded to the nearest whole number. Please provide the required each 50'of total street frontage.The Iron Horse number of boulevard trees on both Iron Horse Road and Manley Road with the formal application submittal. Rd.street frontage measures approx.226'along the property boundary. There are five(5) canopytrees indicated on Iron Horse Rd.The 42 trees on Iron Horse Rd.are planted in ther respective locations to avoid conflict with sewer and water easements.The Manley Rd. street frontage along the propery boundary measures approx.286'.There are seven(7) canopy trees on Manley Rd., planted in their respective locations to avoid conflict with the Comment 10'utility easement.-FSLA Planning BMC 38.570.040.Site Lighting.The formal submittal must include lighting sheets that provide adequate rEnergy 1 has lighting scope and understands the Bailey Minnich fixture details and photometric data necessaryto reviewfor site lighting,entrance lighting,full cut-off,and calculations to be provided for site lighting. Energy 1 will 1/9/25 2:04 PM building mounted lighting. provide a lightingfixtures schedule. 43 Site Illuminate study and lightingfixture Comment schedule has been provided.-E1