HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-02-25 Public Comment - D. Perlstein - Pickle Ball revisitedFrom:DAVID PERLSTEIN
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Pickle Ball revisited
Date:Wednesday, April 2, 2025 11:16:56 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mr. Winn, et al
I am writing to follow up on my formal complaint
dated February 24, 2025, regarding the excessive noise
generated by the pickleball courts at Bogert Park. To
date, I have not received a written response from your
office. This lack of engagement is extremely
disappointing and seems consistent with the pattern of
the City of Bozeman, especially as the City appears to
be moving forward with a mitigation plan that,
according to its own acoustic study, redirects sound
northward—and Westward toward our property at 412
East Olive and also the wildlife corridor on Bozeman
Creek.
Additional Concerns
1. Wildlife & Ecosystem Impact
The sound mitigation design now concentrates noise
along the creek corridor, which runs adjacent to
restored riparian habitat. There has been no public
information shared regarding any assessment of
impacts to birds, aquatic species, or other wildlife that
use this corridor.
• Has the City engaged Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks
(FWP) or any environmental consultant to evaluate this
shift in noise direction?
• If not, this appears to be a significant oversight in
planning.
2. Ignored Expert Recommendations
The City’s current plan contradicts the
recommendations of its own acoustic consultant, who
previously concluded that it was not possible to lower
noise to acceptable levels. Will the City conduct post-
installation sound testing to measure decibels? What
equipment and methods will be used, and will results
be shared with the public?
3. Lack of Transparency on Project History
There has been no community or neighborhood
engagement, zero!
I respectfully and urgently request that the City:
• Immediately engage neighbors before changes are
made.
• A wildlife impact study is conducted and reviewed by
MT FWP
• Disclose all planning, permitting, and funding records
related to the original construction and current
mitigation plan. Have decibel meters are installed
around the area affected.
• Provide a clear answer on whether the city believes it
is in compliance with Montana Code 23-1-126 (Good
Neighbor Policy), given the noise redirection toward
private and public lands
It's time for Bozeman to be proactive instead of
reactive-
Sincerely,
David Perlstein
Braeside Properties LLC
412 East Olive, Bozeman, MT 59715
(406) 579-3500
davidperlstein@gmail.com
On Feb 24, 2025, at 12:14 PM, DAVID PERLSTEIN<davidperlstein@msn.com> wrote:
Braeside Properties
412 East Olive
Bozeman, 59715
406-579-3500
2/24/2025
City of Bozeman
City Manager’s Office
121 N. Rouse Ave
Bozeman, MT 59715
Subject: Formal Complaint Regarding Excessive Pickleball
Noise at Bogert Park
Dear Chuck Winn,
I am writing to formally file a complaint regarding the
ongoing and excessive noise generated by the pickleball
courts at Bogert Park. As a resident of Bozeman, I, along
with many of my neighbors, have been negatively
impacted by the high noise levels associated with
pickleball play at this location.
Violations of Noise Regulations and State Law
1. Excessive Noise Levels Violating Local Ordinances
• Noise studies have documented that pickleball noise
reaches levels of 51-70 dB LAFmax, particularly to the
west and north of the courts.
• These levels exceed acceptable residential noise
thresholds and violate Bozeman’s noise ordinance (Sec.
16.06.050 & Sec. 16.06.060), which prohibits excessive
or unusually loud noise that disturbs residents.
2. Failure to Comply with Montana’s ‘Good Neighbor
Policy’ for Public Recreational Lands
• Montana Code Annotated 23-1-126 establishes a good
neighbor policy requiring that public recreational lands
must not impact adjoining private and public lands
through noise pollution, among other concerns.
• The pickleball courts at Bogert Park directly violate this
law by generating continuous, disruptive noise that
affects nearby homeowners.
• The City of Bozeman has a legal obligation to prevent
excessive noise pollution from public parks and mitigate
harm to residents.
3. Lack of Adequate Noise Mitigation Measures
• Despite noise studies recommending a 20-foot sound
barrier, the City has failed to take sufficient action to
reduce noise pollution.
• The absence of a western sound barrier and the open
sides of the pavilion allow significant noise levels (51-55
dB LAFmax) to reach residential properties, violating
both city ordinances and state law.
Impact on Residents
• Disruption of Peace & Comfort: The constant noise
interferes with daily life, making it difficult to enjoy
outdoor spaces or maintain a peaceful home
environment.
• Potential Property Value Decline: Persistent noise
pollution reduces property values in nearby
neighborhoods, unfairly impacting homeowners.
• Health & Well-Being: Excessive noise exposure is linked
to stress, sleep disturbances, and reduced quality of life.
Requested Actions:
To address this ongoing issue, I formally request that the
City of Bozeman take the following actions:
1. Enforce Noise Regulations: Apply Bozeman’s noise
ordinance to limit excessive noise from the courts,
including setting maximum allowable decibel levels.
2. Ensure Compliance with Montana’s Good Neighbor
Policy (23-1-126):
• Take immediate action to prevent public park noise
pollution from impacting nearby residents.
• Develop and implement a noise mitigation plan that
complies with state law.
3. Implement Noise Reduction Measures:
• Install a western sound barrier to block noise from
traveling into residential areas.
• Restrict court hours to minimize disruption during early
mornings and evenings.
• Require quieter pickleball paddles and balls to reduce
impact noise.
4. Engage with Affected Residents: Conduct community
meetings to hear complaints and work toward a
balanced solution that supports both recreation and
residential quality of life.
Failure to take action will leave residents with no choice
but to pursue further complaints, legal options, and
public action to enforce compliance with city noise
ordinances and state law.
I request a written response detailing the City’s plan to
address this issue. I look forward to your prompt
attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
David Perlstein
Braeside Properties LLC
Sent from my iPhone