HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-01-25 Public Comment - S. Ahmed - Public Comment on The Guthrie – April 1 MeetingFrom:Selenaceae
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Public Comment on The Guthrie – April 1 Meeting
Date:Tuesday, April 1, 2025 11:09:16 AM
Attachments:Comment_April1_SelenaAhmed.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Re: Opposition to the Guthrie Project – Support for Appeal of COA Approval
Dear Bozeman Mayor and City Commissioners,
I am writing in opposition to the proposed Guthrie project and in full support of the
appeal to overturn its Certificate of Appropriateness and site plan approval. The
project fails to meet several key policies related to building mass, scale, and
neighborhood context. Approving it would set a troubling precedent by selectively
disregarding established city code.
My position is not a rejection of growth, affordable housing, or development in
Bozeman. Rather, I urge that development - within the Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District (NCOD) - comply with the binding code. As currently proposed, the
Guthrie project violates the NCOD Design Guidelines—guidelines that are not
discretionary but codified within Bozeman’s Unified Development Code.
Section 38.110.010(B) of the Bozeman Municipal Code explicitly incorporates these
Design Guidelines by reference, making them legally enforceable. Additionally,
Section 38.100.050(A) clarifies that when regulations conflict, the more restrictive
standard prevails—meaning NCOD standards override base zoning like R-5 when
inconsistencies arise, as they clearly do in this case.
The project site is within the NCOD and is legally part of the Karp Addition, a
subdivision platted in 1946 and developed during Bozeman’s postwar expansion. City-
commissioned studies in 2019 and 2020 recommended that the Karp Addition be
evaluated as potential historic districts due to architectural integrity and cohesive
character—a legacy of Bozeman’s development history not yet represented in our
historic registries.
The Guthrie project is dramatically out of scale with the surrounding neighborhood.
Volume analyses show it is up to ten times the size of neighboring buildings—and
twenty times larger than some nearby single-family homes. It brings commercial-scale
massing into a residential character area protected by the NCOD. Rather than
integrating with its surroundings, it overwhelms them, in direct contradiction to Design
Guideline B: Building Mass and Scale, which states: “A new building should not be so
dramatically greater in scale than the established context that the visual continuity of
the neighborhood would be compromised.”
The NCOD has safeguarded the identity and livability of our historic neighborhoods
since 1991. It was created to prevent exactly this kind of development mismatch.Allowing this project to move forward
without full NCOD compliance risks not only
neighborhood character but public trust. It sends a message that our planning code is
optional, that developers can bypass the rules, and that community voices carry little
weight.
I respectfully urge the Commission to support the appeal and require that any future
development on this site fully adheres to NCOD Design Guidelines. This is not just
about one building—it is about preserving Bozeman’s identity, upholding our shared
commitments, and ensuring that our city grows with integrity.
With gratitude,
Selena Ahmed
Re: Opposition to the Guthrie Project – Support for Appeal of COA Approval
Dear Bozeman Mayor and City Commissioners,
I am writing in opposition to the proposed Guthrie project and in full support of the
appeal to overturn its Certificate of Appropriateness and site plan approval. The
project fails to meet several key policies related to building mass, scale, and
neighborhood context. Approving it would set a troubling precedent by selectively
disregarding established city code.
My position is not a rejection of growth, affordable housing, or development in
Bozeman. Rather, I urge that development - within the Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District (NCOD) - comply with the binding code. As currently proposed, the
Guthrie project violates the NCOD Design Guidelines—guidelines that are not
discretionary but codified within Bozeman’s Unified Development Code.
Section 38.110.010(B) of the Bozeman Municipal Code explicitly incorporates these
Design Guidelines by reference, making them legally enforceable. Additionally,
Section 38.100.050(A) clarifies that when regulations conflict, the more restrictive
standard prevails—meaning NCOD standards override base zoning like R-5 when
inconsistencies arise, as they clearly do in this case.
The project site is within the NCOD and is legally part of the Karp Addition, a
subdivision platted in 1946 and developed during Bozeman’s postwar expansion. City-
commissioned studies in 2019 and 2020 recommended that the Karp Addition be
evaluated as potential historic districts due to architectural integrity and cohesive
character—a legacy of Bozeman’s development history not yet represented in our
historic registries.
The Guthrie project is dramatically out of scale with the surrounding neighborhood.
Volume analyses show it is up to ten times the size of neighboring buildings—and
twenty times larger than some nearby single-family homes. It brings commercial-scale
massing into a residential character area protected by the NCOD. Rather than
integrating with its surroundings, it overwhelms them, in direct contradiction to Design
Guideline B: Building Mass and Scale, which states: “A new building should not be so
dramatically greater in scale than the established context that the visual continuity of
the neighborhood would be compromised.”
The NCOD has safeguarded the identity and livability of our historic neighborhoods
since 1991. It was created to prevent exactly this kind of development mismatch.
Allowing this project to move forward without full NCOD compliance risks not only
neighborhood character but public trust. It sends a message that our planning code is
optional, that developers can bypass the rules, and that community voices carry little
weight.
I respectfully urge the Commission to support the appeal and require that any future
development on this site fully adhere to NCOD Design Guidelines. This is not just
about one building—it is about preserving Bozeman’s identity, upholding our shared
commitments, and ensuring that our city grows with integrity.
With gratitude,
Selena Ahmed