HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-01-25 Public Comment - B. MacFawn - In support of the Guthrie Appeal # 25033From:Beth MacFawn
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]In support of the Guthrie Appeal # 25033
Date:Monday, March 31, 2025 6:30:29 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Public Comment to the Bozeman City CommissionRe: Opposition to the Guthrie Project – Support for Appeal of COA Approval
Mayor, Commissioners,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment. I am speaking today in firm opposition to the proposed
construction of the Guthrie project at the site located in the Karp Addition and in full support of the appeal to overturn the
Certificate of Appropriateness and site plan approval issued for this project.
Let me be clear: this is not a rejection of growth, affordable housing, or development in our city. Rather, this is a request that
development within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) be consistent with the mandatory code we
collectively agreed to enforce. The Guthrie project, as currently proposed, clearly and substantially violates the NCOD Design
Guidelines—guidelines that are adopted into Bozeman’s Unified Development Code and must be upheld.the Guthrie, as
proposed, is deeply incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
Volume analysis presented by appellants shows that it is up to 10 times larger by volume than surrounding buildings—20
times larger than some single-family homes nearby. Its size, mass, and scale are drawn from commercial zones—not
residential character areas protected by the NCOD. It overwhelms rather than complements, and disregards NCOD
Guidelines, such as Design Guideline B: Building Mass and Scale, which states: “A new building should not be so
dramatically greater in scale than the established context that the visual continuity of the neighborhood would be
compromised.”
And compromise it would.
Allowing this project to proceed without requiring compliance with the NCOD not only erodes neighborhood character—it
erodes public trust. It sends the message that our planning code is optional, that developers can ignore established guidelines
if they’re inconvenient, and that community voices don’t matter. That is not how Bozeman should grow.
Bozeman can build affordable housing and honor its code. The neighborhood has welcomed housing at this site. Many
residents even preferred adaptive reuse of the existing structure—an environmentally responsible and contextually appropriate
option that would have delivered nearly the same number of bedrooms. The community did not reject housing; it rejected a
proposal that flagrantly disregards the rules we all must follow.
I urge this Commission to uphold the appeal and require that any future development on this site comply fully with the NCOD
Design Guidelines. This is about more than a single building—it’s about preserving Bozeman’s identity, honoring our code,
and protecting the integrity of our process.
Thank you.
Beth MacFawn
NENA homeowner.