HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-27-25 UPF Agenda and Packet MaterialsA. Call to Order - 6:00 PM
B. Disclosures
C. Changes to the Agenda
D. Approval of Minutes
D.1 Approve Minutes from February 27, 2025 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting.(Laughlin)
E. Public Comments on Non-agenda Items Falling within the Purview and Jurisdiction of the Board
THE URBAN PARKS & FORESTRY BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
UPF AGENDA
Thursday, March 27, 2025
General information about the Urban Parks & Forestry Board can be found in our Laserfiche
repository.
If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to
comments@bozeman.net or by visiting the Public Comment Page prior to 12:00pm on the day of the
meeting. At the direction of the City Commission, anonymous public comments are not distributed to
the Board or staff.
Public comments will also be accepted in-person and through Video Conference during the appropriate
agenda items.
As always, the meeting will be streamed through the Commission's video page and available in the
City on cable channel 190.
For more information please contact Mitch Overton, moverton@bozeman.net
This meeting will be held both in-person and also using an online videoconferencing system. You
can join this meeting:
Via Video Conference:
Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit.
Click Join Now to enter the meeting.
Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream, channel 190, or attend in-
person
United States Toll
+1 346 248 7799
Access code: 934 5616 9186
Approve Minutes from February 27, 2025 Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting.
This is the time to comment on any non-agenda matter falling within the scope of the Urban Parks
& Forestry Board. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public
comment relating to that item but you may only speak once per topic. Please note, the Board
1
F. Action Items
F.1 Park Land Trust Community Grant Program (Jadin)
G. FYI/Discussion
G.1 Unified Development Code (UDC) Update Supplemental Engagement Phase 1 Report and
Code Discussion(Rogers)
H. Adjournment
cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the
Board shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful
of others. Please state your name, and state whether you are a resident of the city or a property
owner within the city in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three
minutes.
General public comments to the Board can be found on their Laserfiche repository page.
This board generally meets the fourth Thursday of the month from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm.
Citizen Advisory Board meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that
requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, David Arnado, at 406.582.3232.
2
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Jess Laughlin, Administrative Assistant II
Mitch Overton, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT:Approve Minutes from February 27, 2025 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting.
MEETING DATE:March 27, 2025
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:Approve Minutes from February 27, 2025 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting.
STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of
an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces.
BACKGROUND:In accordance with Commission Resolution 5323 and the City of Bozeman's
Citizen Advisory Board Manual, all Boards must have minutes taken and
approved. Prepared minutes will be provided for approval by the board at
the next scheduled meeting. Staff will make any corrections identified to the
minutes before submitting them to the City Clerk's Office.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:As suggested by the UPF Board.
ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the UPF Board.
FISCAL EFFECTS:None.
Attachments:
Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting 2-27-25 minutes.pdf
Report compiled on: March 20, 2025
3
Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting Minutes, 2/27/25
Page 1 of 3
URBAN PARKS AND FORESTRY BOARD MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
MINUTES
2/27/25
A) 00:02:57 Call to Order - 6:00 PM
B) 00:03:06 Disclosures
C) 00:03:14 Changes to the Agenda
Change to item H. Mitch Overton will give an update for item H1 and H2. Presenters cannot be here this
evening and will present at the March Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting.
D) 00:03:54 Approval of Minutes
D.1 Approve Minutes from January 23, 2025 Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting
UPF Board Mtg Minutes 01_23_25.pdf
E) 00:04:51 Public Comments on Non-agenda Items Falling within the Purview and
Jurisdiction of the Board
F) Special Presentations
G) 00:05:09 Action Items
G.1 00:05:14 Arbor Day Site Selection
01:02:09 Motion to approve Board members to vote for approval of Oak Springs as the 2025 Arbor Day
site.
Teri Lumsden: Motion
Brandt Berube: 2nd
Forestry Update - UPF Board - Feb 27 - Draft.pptx
-00:00:01 Vote on the Motion to approve Board members to vote for approval of Oak Springs as the
2025 Arbor Day site. The Motion carried 5 - 0.
4
Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting Minutes, 2/27/25
Page 2 of 3
Approve:
Dan Fenn
Madisynn Weber
Teri Lumsden
Brandt Berube
Joe Cartwright
Disapprove:
None
G.2 01:03:47 Adoption of the 2025 edition of the City of Bozeman Street Tree Guide
Street Tree Guide - Final Draft.pdf
01:42:45 Motion to approve Consider the Motion: I move to adopt the latest updated edition of the City
of Bozeman Street Tree Guide.
Brandt Berube: Motion
Joe Cartwright: 2nd
-00:00:01 Vote on the Motion to approve Consider the Motion: I move to adopt the latest updated
edition of the City of Bozeman Street Tree Guide. The Motion carried 5 - 0.
Approve:
Dan Fenn
Madisynn Weber
Teri Lumsden
Brandt Berube
Joe Cartwright
Disapprove:
None
H) 01:43:58 FYI/Discussion
H.1 01:45:55 Park Land Trust Community Grant Program
2025-Community-Grant-Program.DRAFT_Version2.docx
Community-Grant-Program-Application.DRAFT_Version1.docx
H.2 01:51:43 Unified Development Code (UDC) Update Supplemental Engagement
Phase 1 Report
UDC Survey Results.pdf
UDC Open House Report - CDB 2-3-2025.pdf
I) 02:01:24 Adjournment
5
Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting Minutes, 2/27/25
Page 3 of 3
6
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Addi Jadin, Park Planning and Development Manager
SUBJECT:Park Land Trust Community Grant Program
MEETING DATE:March 27, 2025
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:Park Land Trust Community Grant Program
STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of
an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces.
BACKGROUND:The Park Land Trust is funded primarily through Cash-in-lieu of Parkland
(CILP) payments made in association with subdivision and site plan
development applications. CILP funds have been used for a handful of
community grants over 20 years including partnerships with homeowners'
associations for small neighborhood park improvements, land acquisition
with Gallatin Valley Land Trust, and investment in snow-making with Bridger
Ski Foundation. Applications have been received on a rolling basis with
limited public outreach.
In addition, the Park Improvement Grant funded through the General Fund
has been used with longtime community partners providing matching funds.
The intent is to relaunch the program with more structure around
application periods, grant periods and conditions, and to align it with the
2023 Parks, Recreation and Active Transportation Plan (PRAT Plan) in terms
of its goals and its strategic action to center park equity through Parks and
Recreation Department procedures.
Information about the Cash-in-lieu of Parkland funding source and its use
can be found in Montana State Law the Bozeman Unified Development Code
and the Bozeman CILP Resolution.
The grant application and information will be posted on the project
webpage upon approval (www.bozeman.net/departments/parks-and-
recreation/parks/community-grant-program).
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:NA.
ALTERNATIVES:NA
7
FISCAL EFFECTS:$220K in FY25 budget for Community Grant Program
Attachments:
2025-Community-Grant-Program-Description.pdf
Community_Grant_Program_Application.docx
Report compiled on: September 20, 2024
8
1
Community Grant Program
Purpose
The City of Bozeman Parks Division is accep�ng grant applica�ons for development, acquisi�on and/or
maintenance projects within parks or recrea�onal areas with public access in the City of Bozeman. The
purposes of the grants are to:
• Advance the goals of the 2023 Comprehensive Parks, Recrea�on and Ac�ve Transporta�on Plan
(PRAT Plan or Plan)
• Enhance exis�ng local public, private and nonprofit partnerships and seek out new ones to
compliment the Parks Division’s priori�es.
• Engage the community through crea�ve projects in parks.
• Incen�vize projects that will posi�vely benefit underserved communi�es and neighborhoods.
• Incen�vize projects in areas of the City with rela�vely lower access to parkland.
Funding Amounts and Project Timelines
The program has $220,000 to be distributed to eligible projects this award cycle. Within that funding
limit, there is no maximum grant request; however, amounts available vary depending on the area of
the City/which park they are proposed for. Applicants are advised to discuss the best loca�on for their
proposal with the project manager (see Applica�on Steps).
Project Themes and Strategies
Grants will be accepted under 4 different themes that align with the PRAT Plan goals described below.
Addi�onally, under each theme, there are specific strategies from the PRAT Plan that should be used to
create grant proposals. In their applica�ons, applicants need only address the strategies that are
per�nent to relevant theme area/areas. Poten�al project ideas are listed in Appendix A.
THEME 1: WELCOMING, EQUITABLE ACCESS
Build on Bozeman’s unique strengths while crea�ng WELCOMING, EQUITABLE ACCESS to all spaces
and programs.
Theme 1 Strategies
• Create a consistent set of basic elements across neighborhoods.
• Maintain the current level of parkland per resident (17 acres per 1000) by growing park
acres as the community grows.
• Balance the needs of different park users.
• Support all-season recrea�on.
• Increase safe evening / night-�me access at designated facili�es with appropriate ligh�ng,
management, and programming.
• Design parks that reflect their unique neighborhoods and reflect the Department’s brand.
9
www.bozeman.net/departments/parks-and-recrea�on/parks/community-grant-program
Page 2
THEME 2: PROGRAMS, PLACES AND PARTNERSHIPS
Strengthen PROGRAMS, PLACES, AND PARTNERSHIPS to meet changing community needs.
Theme 2 Strategies
• Invest in distributed community recrea�on hubs across the City.
• Create elements that respond to community needs, especially for underserved demographic
groups.
THEME 3: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES
Connect Bozeman’s community with safe and enjoyable PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES
Theme 3 Strategies
• Invest in a city-wide ac�ve transporta�on network.
• Develop the network of Anchor Routes that serve as key travel corridors.
• Close exis�ng gaps in the pedestrian + bicycle network.
• Improve east-west connec�ons.
• Improve crossings that act as major barriers for pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Install path improvements along ac�ve transporta�on routes.
• Include Bozeman’s linear parks and watercourse corridors as part of the ac�ve
transporta�on network.
• Ensure inclusive and equitable access to and within parks.
THEME 4: NATURAL RESOURCES
Steward and sustain NATURAL RESOURCES across the parks and trails system.
Theme 4 Strategies
• Create and u�lize new design standards and management prac�ces appropriate to each
park type and its unique landscape.
• Demonstrate sustainable trail and park building.
• Advance the protec�on and enhancement of natural resource areas and trees, especially
sensi�ve lands.
• Expand nature play and programming.
• Implement low-impact design and management prac�ces in park and facility capital
projects.
Primary Review Criteria and Scoring
Grants will be rated using the following review criteria. Criteria 1-2 will be reviewed and scored by City
staff. Staff scores will be presented to the Urban Parks and Forestry Board along with the applica�ons at
a public mee�ng. Criteria 3-6 will be scored by the Urban Parks and Forestry Board (UPFB) Members.
10
www.bozeman.net/departments/parks-and-recrea�on/parks/community-grant-program
Page 3
1. Feasibility of the project’s maintenance requirements and degree of long-term fiscal impacts.
Possible points: 10
Explana�on: Ensure that the maintenance requirements for the project can be assumed by the Parks Division
with available staff �me and financial resources or that the grantees can perform maintenance tasks.
2. Proposal is appropriate for the park type or pathway it is proposed for (see Park Design Manual).
Possible points: 10
Explana�on: Ensure that the proposal does not significantly change the func�on of the park, cause undue
impact to the park or surroundings and that the project is suitable for the size and type of park and its
exis�ng uses.
3. Clarity and completeness of the application materials.
Possible points: 20
Explana�on: Ensure that the applica�on describes a project that can be completed independently by the
grantee or that roles are clearly defined where City assistance is needed. Are steps described, is the project’s
impact easy to understand, and does the applica�on provide enough detail to ensure a posi�ve result?
4. Degree to which the project addresses at least one theme area.
Possible points: 30
Explana�on: Applica�ons must clearly communicate the posi�ve impact(s) of the project and the degree to
which the project or partnership advances the objec�ves of the PRAT Plan and compliments the work of the
Parks and Recrea�on Department.
5. Project, the applicant team, and/or the delivery method improves inclusivity, equity and/or access
within the parks and trails system.
Possible points: 15
Explana�on: Projects should remove cultural, physical or other barriers to accessing the park system and/or
to par�cipa�ng in implementa�on. For example, successful projects will include all ages and abili�es or
remove language barriers to par�cipa�on in volunteer efforts, will consult underserved groups as described
in the PRAT Plan, and/or be led by a diverse team. Projects in an area of town with lower level of proximity to
parks as iden�fied in Figure 3.8 of the PRAT Plan or where investment has not recently occurred will score
higher in this category.
6. Capacity of the applicant(s) to contribute to the City’s communication efforts about the Community
Grant Program including project status updates, social media or other communication, and/or by
planning events to celebrate accomplishment of the project.
Possible points: 15
Explana�on: It is important to track and communicate about progress toward comple�on of the projects to
ensure community support and be responsive to par�cipants’ �me and input. Applicants should give thought
to their project’s �meline and how it will be celebrated or reported on. In certain cases, the project
achievements may best be demonstrated through measurable impacts that can be reported back to the
Urban Parks and Forestry Board or other using other channels or methods.
11
www.bozeman.net/departments/parks-and-recrea�on/parks/community-grant-program
Page 4
Alloca�on of Funding
Once staff and UPFB scores have been collected, staff will create a funding recommenda�on to be finally
approved by the Urban Parks and Forestry Board. Staff will make every effort to ensure projects with the highest
scores are awarded full grant request, but lower scoring projects may also receive funding to beter use the
appropriated grant funds. It is not the intent of the Parks Division to carry forward grant funding into a new
applica�on period; however, that may occur depending on the number of applica�ons received.
Applicant Eligibility
To encourage a diverse array of applica�ons and ensure an inclusive applica�on process, the Parks
Division can be flexible regarding how project funding is dispersed or managed internally. Applica�ons
from a registered non-profit or for-profit en�ty may be eligible to have funding dispersed to them
directly; whereas individuals may work with the City to make purchases of materials or equipment
necessary to carry out the project.
Applica�on Steps
1. Because the projects will be carried out on City property, collabora�on with the Parks Division is
essen�al to crea�ng a successful applica�on. Addi�onally, due to state law, there are some restric�ons
on where the funding source can be spent. Applicants must atend a grant workshop to communicate
with parks staff prior to applica�on submital to discuss project loca�on.
Details to be posted on the grant program webpage.
2. Complete atached applica�on form.
3. Atach supplemental informa�on including the criteria narra�ve (1000 word maximum), visuals including
maps (4 pages maximum), material and labor es�mates, up to 3 leters of recommenda�on.
4. Submit applica�on form and supplemental informa�on as an individual PDF by email to
parksandtrails@bozeman.net by the applica�on deadline.
Applica�on Deadline
The applica�on deadline for 2025 grants is Friday, May 30, 2025 at 5:00 PM.
12
www.bozeman.net/departments/parks-and-recrea�on/parks/community-grant-program
Page 5
Appendix A: Poten�al Project Ideas
THEME 1: WELCOMING, EQUITABLE ACCESS
• Add park assets that were iden�fied as in high demand by the community in the PRAT Plan and its
appendices in new and exis�ng spaces.
• Add elements to increase access citywide to playgrounds (including universal play spaces), trails,
spaces for dogs, community gardens/ food forests, fields, courts, and splash pads.
• Improve universal access of play spaces, pathways, community gardens, wayfinding and signage.
• Invest in acquisi�on of new pathways, parks and natural areas within parks that: 1) help to close
exis�ng 10-minute walk gaps, and 2) overcome extreme physical barriers.
• Acquire land to make key trail, path or park connec�ons iden�fied in the Ac�ve Transporta�on
component of the plan (Goal 3) and to beter connect people to parks.
• Make rules and regula�ons clear and easy to understand in English and Spanish
• Expand and improve dog park spaces to promote balanced use and enjoyment of park spaces by all.
• Support winter ac�vi�es by increasing access to complementary indoor space.
• Communicate best prac�ces for safety outdoors in the winter
• Provide grooming for winter use.
• Use parks to tell stories that engage with arts, culture and local history and reflect local culture.
• Celebrate Bozeman’s park bridges.
THEME 2: PROGRAMS, PLACES AND PARTNERSHIPS
• Expand temporary art exhibi�ons and permanent public art programs across city parks and
facili�es.
THEME 3: PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES
• Construct ac�ve transporta�on network segments to close key connec�vity gaps.
• Improve safety of pedestrian and bicycle crossings.
• Priori�ze construc�on of east-west network facili�es.
• Install the PRAT-recommended improvements along trail routes including but not limited to
wayfinding, shade, benches, drinking fountains, restrooms, ligh�ng.
THEME 4: NATURAL RESOURCES
• Design and demonstrate landscape design and management best prac�ces.
• Design and demonstrate sustainable trail design and maintenance.
• Use though�ul trail design that encourages people to stay on the trail with invi�ng access points to
sit, watch, fish, and play.
• Design and demonstrate ways for people and children to interact with wetlands, waterways and
forests.
• Plant drought tolerant and na�ve vegeta�on and trees.
13
www.bozeman.net/departments/parks-and-recrea�on/parks/community-grant-program
Page 6
APPENDIX B: Cita�on from Montana Code Annotated Regarding Funding
(5) (a) In accordance with the provisions of subsec�ons (5)(b) and (5)(c), the governing body shall use
the dedicated money or land for development, acquisi�on, or maintenance of parks to serve the
subdivision.
(b) The governing body may use the dedicated money to acquire, develop, or maintain, within its
jurisdic�on, parks or recrea�onal areas or for the purchase of public open space or conserva�on
easements only if:
(i) the park, recrea�onal area, open space, or conserva�on easement is within a reasonably
close proximity to the proposed subdivision
14
COMMUNITY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION
Project Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________
Location: __________________________________________________________________________________________
Location of project within the park/public recreation area and nearest cross street:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Applicant (Organization): _____________________________________________________________________________
Primary Contact(s): __________________________________________________________________________________
Phone Number(s): ___________________________________________________________________________________
Email Address(es): ___________________________________________________________________________________
Funding Requested: _________________________________________________________________________________
Match Provided by Applicant FINANCIAL (IF APPLICABLE/NOT REQUIRED): ___________________
Match Provided by Applicant VALUE OF IN-KIND LABOR OR MATERIALS (IF APPLICABLE/NOT REQUIRED):
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICATION INFORMATION
FUNDING REQUEST
BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (DO NOT EXCEED SPACE PROVIDED)
15
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Tom Rogers, Senior Planner
Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager
Erin George, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:Unified Development Code (UDC) Update Supplemental Engagement Phase
1 Report and Code Discussion
MEETING DATE:March 27, 2025
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission
RECOMMENDATION:No action required
STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the
community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from
the community and stakeholders.
BACKGROUND:The Unified Development Code (UDC) sets regulations around what kinds of
development can occur in which areas. For the 2022-2023 Commission 2-
year priority cycle, Bozeman City Commission named the UDC update as a
key priority of the City. Thus began the UDC Update process, a project that
kicked off in summer 2022 with the goals of:
Implementing the vision and goals of other guiding City documents,
such as the 2020 Community Plan, Climate Plan, and the Community
Housing Action Plan.
Making the Code more user-friendly.
Updating the Code per changes in state law.
A variety of in-person and virtual engagement opportunities were held
throughout 2022 and 2023, and in the summer of 2023, following feedback
from the public and Commission, a draft code was released. Many residents
expressed concerns about the draft, with some wanting more time to review
and give feedback. In October 2023, Commission paused the process with
the desire to pick back up in 2024. In September 2024, Commission began
the restart of the project with a work session on how the project will
resume, including what engagement might look like. On October 1,
Commission approved the supplemental engagement plan.
Original UDC draft was released. Many residents expressed concerns about
the draft, with some wanting more time to review and give feedback. In
October 2023, Commission paused the process with the desire to pick back
up in 2024. In September 2024, Commission began the restart of the project
16
with a work session on how the project will resume, including what
engagement might look like. On October 1, Commission approved the
supplemental engagement plan. Based on initial public comment, the UDC
was revised to address key comment areas and re-released on October 29,
2024.
Since then, staff have executed the plan through the following methods:
Launched an online survey that ran from Nov. 22 through Jan. 8 and
garnered 229 responses.
Hosted an online webinar on 12/9 that had 76 attendees.
Hosted five open houses, one in each quadrant (NW, SW, SE, NE) of
the City and one at MSU, which had at least 238 attendees total across
all events (some attendees were not captured at sign-in).
Hosted 7 meetings with groups including Local Food Systems partners,
Better Bozeman Coalition, University Neighborhood Association, Jandt
Neighborhood Association, Midtown Neighborhood Association,
Cooper Park Neighborhood Association, and Northeast Neighborhood
Association.
Used a variety of methods to communicate engagement opportunities
including emails to key partners; Engage Bozeman newsletters and
web updates; Bozeman.net banner, e-notifications and calendar
updates; a message in the utility bill; a paid mailer to all who reside in
the city; a press release to media outlets; a paid Facebook/Instagram
social media ad; social media posts on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter,
Nextdoor; and a paid ad in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle.
This presentation will review these activities and remind residents about
what to anticipate as we enter phase 2 of the supplemental engagement,
provide an overview of what we heard during these events, and show how
those comments are being used to inform the key topics that will be covered
in the upcoming engagement. During this item, Commissioners will be asked
to review this material, ask questions, and provide guidance on future
engagement activities and topics to ensure staff remain on course with
expectations.
Purpose of meeting
This presentation and discussion will review activities and findings from
Phase I of the supplementary engagement and remind residents about what
to anticipate as we enter phase 2 of the supplemental engagement, provide
an overview of what we heard during these events, and show how those
comments are being used to inform the key topics that will be covered in the
upcoming engagement.
Secondly, as directed by the City Commission on Tuesday, February 4, 2025,
engage in a discussion with the Board on relevant areas of the code and
reaffirm the prior recommendations of specific code sections referenced
above.
17
This presentation will review these activities and remind residents about
what to anticipate as we enter phase 2 of the supplemental engagement,
provide an overview of what we heard during these events, and show how
those comments are being used to inform the key topics that will be covered
in the upcoming engagement. During this item, Commissioners will be asked
to review this material, ask questions, and provide guidance on future
engagement activities and topics to ensure staff remain on course with
expectations.
Two summary reports are attached to this memo. First is the Online Survey
Results from the online questionnaire and secondly is a summary report
from the in-person Open Houses. Full summaries of the Supplementary
Engagement Workshops are not compiled at this time.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None.
ALTERNATIVES:None.
FISCAL EFFECTS:None.
Attachments:
UDC Survey Results.pdf
UDC Open House Report - CDB 2-3-2025.pdf
Report compiled on: March 19, 2025
18
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
1 / 23
Q1 330 individuals and counting have shared public comment on the
proposed code out of 59,050 Bozeman residents. Areas of interest and
concern are listed below. Please rank these topics in order of importance
to you.Note: The City currently has separate projects underway to address
some of these areas of interest – Landmark Program (historic
preservation), Affordable Housing Ordinance, integrated water resource
plan.
Answered: 221 Skipped: 8
19
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
2 / 23
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Residential
zoning
districts
Neighborhood
character
Density
Population
growth
Historic
preservation
Bike
infrastructure
Pedestrian
infrastructure
Parking number
and
configuration
Water adequacy
Minimizing
agricultural
impacts
Sensitive
lands (e.g.
streams &...
Business
development
(jobs)
Affordable
housing
creation
Affordable
housing
preservation
Building
height
Expansion of
City boundary
20
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
3 / 23
7.24%
16
5.43%
12
9.05%
20
4.52%
10
6.33%
14
9.95%
22
4.52%
10
6.79%
15
6.79%
15
9.50%
21
3.62%
8
5.88%
1
9.50%
21
7.24%
16
5.88%
13
4.98%
11
4.52%
10
9.05%
20
9.05%
20
6.33%
14
3.17%
7
6.33%
14
7.69%
17
5.88%
1
5.88%
13
7.69%
17
6.79%
15
5.88%
13
6.79%
15
7.69%
17
5.43%
12
6.79%
15
4.52%
10
5.88%
13
7.69%
17
6.79%
1
6.33%
14
4.52%
10
5.88%
13
4.07%
9
3.17%
7
6.79%
15
2.26%
5
6.79%
15
6.79%
15
6.79%
15
7.24%
16
8.14%
1
4.07%
9
3.17%
7
4.52%
10
6.33%
14
6.33%
14
4.07%
9
9.50%
21
5.43%
12
6.33%
14
9.05%
20
10.41%
23
5.43%
1
5.43%
12
2.71%
6
4.07%
9
10.41%
23
6.79%
15
5.88%
13
5.43%
12
8.60%
19
4.98%
11
4.98%
11
9.05%
20
4.07%
1.81%
4
4.98%
11
6.33%
14
9.50%
21
10.86%
24
8.60%
19
7.24%
16
9.05%
20
7.69%
17
7.69%
17
4.52%
10
7.24%
1
2.71%
6
3.17%
7
4.52%
10
1.36%
3
3.17%
7
4.07%
9
6.33%
14
7.24%
16
8.60%
19
7.24%
16
7.69%
17
6.79%
1
17.19%
38
15.84%
35
9.95%
22
9.50%
21
8.14%
18
9.50%
21
4.98%
11
5.88%
13
3.17%
7
2.26%
5
4.07%
9
3.62%
3.17%
7
5.43%
12
3.62%
8
4.98%
11
4.07%
9
5.43%
12
4.52%
10
4.98%
11
11.31%
25
6.79%
15
6.33%
14
9.50%
2
14.03%
31
12.67%
28
5.88%
13
8.14%
18
9.50%
21
4.98%
11
8.14%
18
6.79%
15
4.98%
11
4.07%
9
4.52%
10
4.98%
1
2.26%
5
1.81%
4
1.36%
3
2.71%
6
1.81%
4
2.71%
6
4.98%
11
5.43%
12
7.69%
17
4.98%
11
5.88%
13
8.60%
1
9.05%
20
8.60%
19
9.50%
21
6.33%
14
8.60%
19
4.52%
10
6.33%
14
4.52%
10
7.24%
16
2.71%
6
5.88%
13
5.43%
1
6.79%
15
9.05%
20
9.05%
20
9.95%
22
7.69%
17
7.24%
16
6.33%
14
9.05%
20
7.24%
16
5.88%
13
1.81%
4
4.98%
1
4.07%
9
5.88%
13
5.88%
13
6.33%
14
7.24%
16
4.52%
10
9.50%
21
2.71%
6
6.33%
14
9.95%
22
4.98%
11
4.98%
1
0.45%
1
1.81%
4
7.69%
17
4.98%
11
4.98%
11
4.98%
11
5.43%
12
3.62%
8
3.17%
7
5.88%
13
8.60%
19
7.69%
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Residential
zoning
districts
Neighborhood
character
Density
Population
growth
Historic
preservation
Bike
infrastructure
Pedestrian
infrastructure
Parking
number and
configuration
Water
adequacy
Minimizing
agricultural
impacts
Sensitive
lands (e.g.
streams &
wetlands
areas, steep
slopes)
Business
development
(jobs)
Affordable
housing
creation
Affordable
housing
preservation
Building
height
Expansion of
City
boundary
21
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
4 / 23
Q2 If you think important topic(s) are missing above, please list here:
Answered: 104 Skipped: 125
22
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
5 / 23
Q3 Please pick 3 areas that you think are less important for the City to
focus on / are not important to you.
Answered: 229 Skipped: 0
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Residential
zoning
districts
Neighborhood
character
Density
Population
growth
Historic
preservation
Bike
infrastructure
Pedestrian
infrastructure
Parking number
and
configuration
Water adequacy
Minimizing
agricultural
impacts
Sensitive
lands (e.g.
streams &...
Business
development
(jobs)
Affordable
housing
creation
Affordable
housing
preservation
Building
height
Expansion of
City boundary
23
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
6 / 23
10.04%23
14.41%33
14.85%34
16.16%37
12.66%29
20.09%46
9.17%21
21.83%50
3.49%8
20.09%46
5.68%13
48.47%111
12.66%29
6.99%16
23.14%53
44.98%103
Total Respondents: 229
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Residential zoning districts
Neighborhood character
Density
Population growth
Historic preservation
Bike infrastructure
Pedestrian infrastructure
Parking number and configuration
Water adequacy
Minimizing agricultural impacts
Sensitive lands (e.g. streams & wetlands areas, steep slopes)
Business development (jobs)
Affordable housing creation
Affordable housing preservation
Building height
Expansion of City boundary
24
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
7 / 23
20.95%44
50.95%107
18.10%38
10.00%21
Q4 How familiar are you with the UDC?
Answered: 210 Skipped: 19
TOTAL 210
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Very familiar
Somewhat
familiar
Not very
familiar
Not at all
familiar
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not very familiar
Not at all familiar
25
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
8 / 23
69.19%146
30.81%65
Q5 Did you know the code update started in the fall of 2022?
Answered: 211 Skipped: 18
TOTAL 211
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
26
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
9 / 23
56.94%119
43.06%90
Q6 Have you signed up on Engage Bozeman to follow the UDC project?
Answered: 209 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 209
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
27
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
10 / 23
49.52%103
50.48%105
Q7 Have you attended an event or submitted a comment on the UDC
update?
Answered: 208 Skipped: 21
TOTAL 208
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
28
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
11 / 23
40.19%84
59.81%125
Q8 Have you participated in other City planning documents, e.g. Parks,
Recreation and Active Transportation Plan (PRAT), growth policy?
Answered: 209 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 209
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
29
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
12 / 23
43.81%92
56.19%118
Q9 Have you attended a Commission meeting in the past year?
Answered: 210 Skipped: 19
TOTAL 210
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
30
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
13 / 23
62.86%132
37.14%78
Q10 The City works inside the legal framework established by the state.
Are you aware that in 2023 the state holistically changed the legal
structure for land use planning and development? (Montana Land Use
Planning Act AKA SB382)
Answered: 210 Skipped: 19
TOTAL 210
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
31
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
14 / 23
85.10%177
14.90%31
Q11 Would you care to hear more about the zoning process or specific
components?
Answered: 208 Skipped: 21
TOTAL 208
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
32
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
15 / 23
Q12 There are different groups in the community that help share news and
updates about City projects. In learning about the UDC update project,
which of these sources were your top 3 sources of information?
Answered: 213 Skipped: 16
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Formal
neighborhood
organizations
Inter
Neighborhood
Council...
Friend/neighbor
Colleague
Realtors
Architects and
Builders
Planning
Department
Advisory
boards
appointed by...
City
Commission
meetings
Ad hoc citizen
groups
Individual
property owners
and renters
Engage Bozeman
Newspaper/other
news outlet
Social Media
Other (please
specify)
33
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
16 / 23
23.47%50
6.10%13
27.23%58
14.55%31
3.29%7
10.33%22
8.45%18
6.57%14
20.66%44
15.02%32
8.45%18
33.80%72
37.56%80
27.23%58
14.55%31
Total Respondents: 213
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Formal neighborhood organizations
Inter Neighborhood Council meetings
Friend/neighbor
Colleague
Realtors
Architects and Builders
Planning Department
Advisory boards appointed by the City Commission
City Commission meetings
Ad hoc citizen groups
Individual property owners and renters
Engage Bozeman
Newspaper/other news outlet
Social Media
Other (please specify)
34
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
17 / 23
29.47%61
66.18%137
0.00%0
0.00%0
4.35%9
Q13 Which best describes your housing situation at this time?
Answered: 207 Skipped: 22
TOTAL 207
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
I rent a home
I own a home
I own a
manufactured
home
I am unhoused
Prefer not to
answer
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
I rent a home
I own a home
I own a manufactured home
I am unhoused
Prefer not to answer
35
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
18 / 23
22.97%48
26.79%56
8.61%18
31.10%65
3.83%8
6.70%14
Q14 Please select the quadrant where you live. This information will not be
used to identify your place of residence but will help us understand
similarities and differences experienced based on where people live.
Answered: 209 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 209
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
NW
NE
SW
SE
Prefer not to
answer
Outside of
Bozeman City
Limits (plea...
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
NW
NE
SW
SE
Prefer not to answer
Outside of Bozeman City Limits (please specify where)
36
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
19 / 23
0.00%0
5.74%12
22.49%47
17.22%36
13.88%29
14.83%31
17.22%36
5.74%12
2.87%6
Q15 What is your age?
Answered: 209 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 209
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Under 18
19-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75+
Prefer not to
answer
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Under 18
19-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75+
Prefer not to answer
37
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
20 / 23
3.35%7
20.10%42
11.00%23
61.72%129
1.91%4
1.91%4
Q16 How long have you lived in Bozeman?
Answered: 209 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 209
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Less than one
year
1-5 years
6-10 years
More than 10
years
Not a resident
Prefer not to
answer
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Less than one year
1-5 years
6-10 years
More than 10 years
Not a resident
Prefer not to answer
38
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
21 / 23
40.19%84
59.81%125
Q17 Have you ever applied for a building permit or planning application
with the City of Bozeman?
Answered: 209 Skipped: 20
TOTAL 209
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
39
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
22 / 23
Q18 If you think zoning is important, why?
Answered: 150 Skipped: 79
40
UDC Survey on Areas of Interest
23 / 23
74.76%154
25.24%52
Q19 Do you know what zoning district you live in?
Answered: 206 Skipped: 23
TOTAL 206
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
41
Unified Development Code (UDC) Update
Supplemental Engagement Phase I
Open House Summary Report
January 29, 2025 | DRAFT
42
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOBAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 3
WORD CLOUD ........................................................................................................................... 8
BY EVENT TOTALS ..................................................................................................................... 9
December 2, 2024, MSU Summary ..................................................................................... 9
December 4, 2024, Gallatin High School Summary .......................................................... 10
December 5, 2024, Hope Lutheran Church Summary ...................................................... 12
December 9, 2024, Online Summary ................................................................................ 13
December 11, 2024, Fairgrounds Summary ..................................................................... 15
December 12, 2024, Sacajawea Middle School Summary ............................................... 17
43
3
Global Summary
Priority Comment Count
P1 P2 P3 Total
December 2 Open House - MSU 54 30 16 100 17.3%
December 4 Open House - Gallatin High 28 13 24 65 11.2%
December 5 Open House - Hope Lutheran 34 16 35 85 14.7%
December 9 Open House - Online 40 38 38 116 20.1%
December 11 Open House - Fairgrounds 73 41 26 140 24.2%
December 12 Open House - Sacajawea 41 21 10 72 12.5%
270 159 149 578
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
Open House Summary Chart P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 73 18 16 107 19.6%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 45 22 17 84 15.4%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 44 20 14 78 14.3%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 35 23 14 72 13.2%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 23 20 26 69 12.6%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 19 18 14 51 9.3%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 16 13 12 41 7.5%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 12 8 3 23 4.2%
Solar 6 2 6 14 2.6%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 4 1 2 7 1.3%
277 145 124 546
44
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility)
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice)
Density (zoning, growth, urban)
Building (bulk, mass, height, design)
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike)
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply)
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest)
Transitions (buildings & districts)
Solar
Community involvement (process, engagement)
Community Priorities -December 2024 Open House Summary
45
5
December 2, 2024, MSU Data Set:
1. Affordable Housing:
o Emphasis on preserving naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) and
preventing luxury condos.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Calls for limiting building heights and ensuring compatibility with existing
neighborhood character.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Focus on managing traffic and parking issues, with suggestions for improved
public transportation.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Emphasis on protecting trees, urban forests, and water resources.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Careful consideration of zoning changes and zone-edge transitions.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for open planning processes and community engagement.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased development.
December 4, 2024, Gallatin High School Data Set:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Emphasis on preserving naturally occurring affordable housing and addressing
housing and rent affordability.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Strong focus on limiting building heights on Main Street and surrounding
neighborhoods.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate off-street parking and improved public transportation.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Strong emphasis on water adequacy and conservation.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Emphasis on downzoning historic neighborhoods to prevent large-scale
developments.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for reengaging public advisory boards and involving the public earlier.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity, including utilities, water supply, and
traffic planning.
46
6
December 5, 2024, Hope Lutheran Church Data Set:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Continued emphasis on preserving NOAH and increasing options for regular
folks.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Strong focus on limiting building heights, particularly in historic neighborhoods.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate off-street parking for new units.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Strong emphasis on water adequacy and conservation.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Calls for creating transition zones to protect existing neighborhoods.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Reengaging public advisory boards and community involvement in decision-
making.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased development.
December 9, 2024, Online Data Set:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Emphasis on intentional housing development prioritizing affordability.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Continued focus on limiting building heights and ensuring compatibility.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate off-street parking and improved public transportation
planning.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Continued emphasis on protecting trees, urban forests, and water resources.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the character of existing neighborhoods.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Careful consideration of zoning changes and integration of mixed-use
developments.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for open planning processes and community engagement.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity and designing streets for safety.
47
7
December 11, 2024, Fairgrounds Data Set:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Strong emphasis on maintaining affordable housing and preventing short-term
rentals.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Strong focus on limiting building heights and preserving sunlight and views.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate parking and improved public transportation.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Strong emphasis on water adequacy and conservation.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical integrity of neighborhoods.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Calls for downzoning historic neighborhoods and creating transition zones.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for more open and transparent planning processes with community
involvement.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity and safety provisions.
December 12, 2024, Sacajawea Middle School Data Set:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Continued emphasis on increasing affordable housing and avoiding luxury
developments.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Strong focus on limiting building heights and maintaining neighborhood
character.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate parking and better public transportation.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Strong focus on water conservation and protecting urban forests.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve historical neighborhoods and create transition zones.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Calls for careful zoning changes and better definitions.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Continued calls for open planning processes and early community involvement.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity and ensuring safety provisions.
48
8
Word Cloud
49
9
By Event Totals
December 2, 2024, MSU Summary
Common Concerns and Priorities:
1. Preservation of Neighborhood Character:
o Many participants emphasize the importance of maintaining the historical
character and integrity of neighborhoods.
o Concerns about new buildings dwarfing existing single-family homes are
frequent.
o There's a strong sentiment towards protecting the architectural style and
historical significance of existing structures.
2. Building Height and Density:
o Repeated mentions of the need to limit the height of new structures.
o Many want to prevent high-density developments that are out of scale with the
current neighborhood.
o The idea of balancing density with neighborhood character is a common thread.
3. Environmental and Natural Resource Protection:
o Significant focus on preserving trees, urban forests, wetlands, and water
resources.
o The importance of sustainable development practices, such as xeriscaping and
water conservation, is frequently mentioned.
4. Traffic and Parking Concerns:
o Numerous mentions of the need to manage traffic and parking, especially in
relation to large apartment buildings.
o Concerns about congestion and safety due to inadequate parking infrastructure
in older neighborhoods.
5. Affordable Housing and Livability:
o Many participants are advocating for truly affordable housing, not luxury units.
o There is a desire to preserve affordable housing options and to prevent the
displacement of current residents.
o Discussion around ensuring that new developments enhance, rather than
detract from, the livability of neighborhoods.
6. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for more open and transparent processes in urban planning.
o Suggestions for holding town hall meetings and studies to better understand the
community's needs and priorities.
7. Infrastructure and Services:
o Concerns about the adequacy of existing infrastructure to support new
developments.
o Emphasis on planning for future needs, such as light rail and improved transit
options.
50
10
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
December 2 Open House - MSU P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 16 7 3 26 23.6%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 8 4 0 12 10.9%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 8 5 3 16 14.5%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 6 2 2 10 9.1%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 7 4 0 11 10.0%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 10 4 3 17 15.5%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 4 2 3 9 8.2%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 1 0 0 1 0.9%
Solar 3 1 1 5 4.5%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 3 0 0 3 2.7%
66 29 15 110
December 4, 2024, Gallatin High School Summary
Recurrent Themes and Concerns:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Strong focus on preserving naturally occurring affordable housing.
o Concerns about ensuring new developments include truly affordable units rather
than luxury options.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Calls for limiting the height of new buildings, particularly on Main Street and
surrounding neighborhoods.
o Desire for new constructions to be consistent with the existing neighborhood's
character and aesthetics.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Frequent mentions of the need for adequate off-street parking for new units.
o Concerns about the impact of increased density on parking availability and traffic
congestion.
o Emphasis on improving public transportation options to complement increased
density.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Focus on protecting trees, urban canopy, and ensuring sustainable water usage.
51
11
o Calls for measures to address climate change and environmental sustainability.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to protect the historical integrity and character of neighborhoods.
o Concerns about luxury developments altering the existing neighborhood
dynamics.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Calls for careful consideration of zoning changes to maintain neighborhood
character.
o Emphasis on zone-edge transitions and setbacks to ensure compatibility
between different zoning areas.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Need for more open and transparent planning processes.
o Desire for community involvement in decision-making to ensure developments
align with residents' needs.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased population and
development.
o Importance of designing streets and roads to enhance safety for pedestrians and
cyclists.
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
December 4 Open House - Gallatin High P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 7 2 2 11 18.6%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 1 4 3 8 13.6%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 5 4 4 13 22.0%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 2 1 1 4 6.8%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 2 2 2 6 10.2%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 0 2 1 3 5.1%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 3 3 4 10 16.9%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Solar 1 0 1 2 3.4%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 1 1 2 3.4%
22 19 18 59
52
12
December 5, 2024, Hope Lutheran Church Summary
Recurring Themes and Concerns:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Strong focus on preserving naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH).
o Concerns about luxury condos and the need for truly affordable housing options.
o Impact of zoning changes on housing affordability.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Emphasis on limiting the height of new buildings, particularly in historic
neighborhoods.
o Need for new constructions to be consistent with the existing neighborhood's
character and aesthetics.
o Concerns about zoning changes that could drastically alter neighborhood
character.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate off-street parking for new units.
o Prioritizing bike lanes, sidewalks, and non-auto corridors to reduce car
dependency.
o Impact of increased density on parking and traffic congestion.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Continued emphasis on protecting trees, urban forests, and water resources.
o Measures to address climate change and promote environmental sustainability.
o Preservation of solar access and other natural resources.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
o Concerns about luxury developments impacting existing neighborhood
dynamics.
o Calls to downzone historic neighborhoods to prevent large-scale developments.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Careful consideration of zoning changes to maintain neighborhood character.
o Emphasis on zone-edge transitions and smoother integration of mixed-use
developments.
o Recognition and conservation of agricultural land.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for more open and transparent planning processes with community
involvement.
o Reengaging public advisory boards and increasing community engagement in
decision-making.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased development.
o Designing streets and roads to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
o Addressing utility and sewer infrastructure needs.
53
13
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
December 5 Open House - Hope Lutheran P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 8 1 5 14 17.3%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 2 4 6 12 14.8%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 3 1 5 9 11.1%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 1 1 3 5 6.2%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 4 2 4 10 12.3%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 2 1 2 5 6.2%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 6 4 4 14 17.3%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 1 1 2 4 4.9%
Solar 1 0 3 4 4.9%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 1 2 1 4 4.9%
29 17 35 81
December 9, 2024, Online Summary
Recurring Themes and Concerns:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Continued emphasis on increasing the availability of affordable housing.
o Concerns about luxury condos and the need for more affordable units.
o Calls for intentional housing development that prioritizes attainability and
affordability.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Strong focus on limiting the height of new buildings, especially in historic
neighborhoods.
o Ensuring new constructions are compatible with the existing neighborhood's
character and aesthetics.
o Need for clear definitions of compatibility within zoning districts and the NCOD.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate off-street parking for new units.
o Prioritizing walkability, bike lanes, sidewalks, and other non-auto corridors to
reduce car dependency.
o Planning for public transportation and addressing traffic issues proactively.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Emphasis on protecting trees, urban forests, water resources, and wildlife
habitats.
54
14
o Measures to address climate change and promote environmental sustainability,
including solar access protections and water conservation.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
o Concerns about zoning changes that could alter neighborhood character and the
impact of large developments on existing communities.
o Calls to downzone historic neighborhoods to prevent high-density
developments.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Careful consideration of zoning changes to maintain neighborhood character and
allow for higher density near transit stations and employment areas.
o Emphasis on zone-edge transitions and smoother integration of mixed-use
developments.
o Calls for better definitions and consistency in zoning requirements.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for more open and transparent planning processes with community
involvement.
o Reengaging public advisory boards and increasing community engagement in
decision-making.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased development,
including utilities, water supply, and traffic planning.
o Designing streets and roads to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
o Addressing the need for adequate parking and safety provisions in new
developments.
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
December 9 Open House - Online P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 6 2 0 8 9.5%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 2 4 1 7 8.3%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 11 3 2 16 19.0%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 1 5 4 10 11.9%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 7 5 6 18 21.4%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 4 3 3 10 11.9%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 3 4 6 13 15.5%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Solar 0 0 1 1 1.2%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 1 0 0 1 1.2%
35 26 23 84
55
15
December 11, 2024, Fairgrounds Summary
Recurring Themes and Concerns:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Continued focus on preserving naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH).
o Concerns about luxury high-rises displacing more affordable options.
o Emphasis on affordable housing for residents, not just for profit.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Strong focus on limiting building heights, particularly to prevent obstruction of
views and sunlight.
o Concerns about tall buildings in single-story neighborhoods and the impact on
neighborhood character.
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate parking, including specific requirements like one space
per bedroom.
o Emphasis on improving public transportation and creating walkable, transit-
oriented communities.
o Concerns about traffic safety and infrastructure.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Strong emphasis on water adequacy and conservation.
o Calls to protect urban forests and prevent clear-cutting by developers.
o Encouragement for sustainable development practices and water-saving
measures.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
o Concerns about zoning changes that could alter neighborhood character.
o Calls for creating transition zones to protect existing neighborhoods from high-
density developments.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Careful consideration of zoning changes to maintain neighborhood character and
allow for higher density in appropriate areas.
o Emphasis on downzoning historic neighborhoods to prevent large-scale
developments.
o Calls for better definitions and consistency in zoning requirements.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
o Calls for more open and transparent planning processes with community
involvement.
o Involving the general public earlier in the planning process to align with
community needs and views.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased development,
including utilities, water supply, and traffic planning.
56
16
o Designing streets and roads to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
o Ensuring developments provide adequate parking and safety provisions.
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
December 11 Open House - Fairgrounds P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 24 5 2 31 22.1%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 13 5 4 22 15.7%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 11 6 3 20 14.3%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 4 4 2 10 7.1%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 18 6 1 25 17.9%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 1 4 4 9 6.4%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 4 5 5 14 10.0%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Solar 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 3 4 2 9 6.4%
78 39 23 140
57
17
December 12, 2024, Sacajawea Middle School Summary
Recurring Themes and Concerns:
1. Housing and Rent Affordability:
o Strong emphasis on maintaining and increasing affordable housing, particularly
for people who work in the city.
o Concerns about short-term rentals and the need to prevent them in certain
neighborhoods.
o Calls to stop luxury high-rises that displace more affordable housing options.
2. Building Height and Compatibility:
o Continued focus on limiting building heights, especially in historic
neighborhoods.
o Desire to maintain the character of existing neighborhoods by controlling the
height and scale of new buildings.
o Specific suggestions to limit building heights to certain landmarks (e.g., the
Baxter Hotel).
3. Parking and Transportation:
o Advocacy for adequate off-street parking for new units, with specific
requirements such as one spot per bedroom.
o Emphasis on improving public safety and providing incentives for new police and
fire department staff.
o Calls to connect bike and walking paths to enhance walkability and reduce traffic
congestion.
4. Environmental and Natural Resource Preservation:
o Strong focus on protecting water resources and prioritizing water conservation.
o Emphasis on preserving trees, urban forests, and ensuring green space in new
developments.
o Calls to encourage energy efficiency and sustainability in new construction.
5. Neighborhood Character and Integrity:
o Desire to preserve the historical and architectural integrity of neighborhoods.
o Concerns about zoning changes and high-density developments impacting
existing neighborhood character.
o Calls to create transition zones to protect existing neighborhoods from large,
luxury apartment projects.
6. Zoning and Land Use:
o Careful consideration of zoning changes to maintain neighborhood character and
allow for diverse housing types.
o Emphasis on zone-edge transitions and downzoning central historic
neighborhoods to prevent high-density developments.
o Calls for better definitions and consistency in zoning requirements.
7. Transparency and Community Involvement:
58
18
o Calls for more open and transparent planning processes with community
involvement.
o Involving the general public earlier in the planning process to align with
community needs and views.
8. Safety and Infrastructure:
o Concerns about infrastructure capacity to handle increased development,
including utilities, water supply, and traffic planning.
o Designing streets and roads to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists.
o Ensuring developments provide adequate parking and safety provisions.
Community Priority Summary – Tally by topic
December 12 Open House - Sacajawea P1 P2 P3 All
Neighborhood (character, preservation,
compatibility) 12 1 4 17 23.6%
Building (bulk, mass, height, design) 9 2 0 11 15.3%
Housing (Affordable, supply, variety, choice) 7 3 0 10 13.9%
Environment (protection, open space, natural
areas, parks, wetlands, trees, forest) 2 0 0 2 2.8%
Density (zoning, growth, urban) 6 1 1 8 11.1%
Utilities (water, adequacy, supply) 2 4 1 7 9.7%
Transportation (Traffic, parking, walk, bike) 3 2 4 9 12.5%
Community involvement (process, engagement) 2 0 0 2 2.8%
Solar 1 1 0 2 2.8%
Transitions (buildings & districts) 3 1 0 4 5.6%
47 15 10 72
59