HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-04-25 Public Comment - M. Bateson - Application 24606 - Please DENYFrom:Mary Bateson
To:Bozeman Public Comment
Subject:[EXTERNAL]Application 24606 - Please DENY
Date:Sunday, March 2, 2025 2:45:36 PM
Attachments:BTC_Comments_App_24606_3-2-25.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To whom it should concern:I request that the City of Bozeman's Community Development Director , Erin George, DENY
Application 24606. The public boulevard trees along W. Lamme between Tracy and
Willson are all that remain near the “old hospital” and Mountain View Care Center
site. These heritage trees are now being threatened by Home Base
Partners’ Application 24606. This is OUTRAGEOUS. Please deny this
application. I fully agree with the comments provided by the Bozeman Tree
Coalition's Public Comment on this application 24606 (please read it completely, also
attached for your convenience). There are so many important reasons to keep these
trees. They should be protected and cherished. There are so few reasons that we
need more buildings in our neighborhood that have 12 foot sidewalks with no buildingsetbacks.
Please do not allow more of our old growth trees to be lost! Too many have been
taken already!
Mary Bateson427 North Tracy Ave.
Bozeman, MT 59715
406-586-8832
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 1 of 9
To: Bozeman Community Development Department
From: Bozeman Tree Coalition, co-founders Daniel Carty, Angie Kociolek, and Marcia Kaveney
Subj: Request to deny Application No. 24606, the North Central Master Site Plan Modification
(MOD, CY2025), which seeks to modify Application No. 21029, the North Central Master
Site Plan (MSP, CY2021)
Introduction
Application No. 24606 (MOD; CY2025) seeks, among other things, to change the block
frontage, open space, and Tree Preservation Plan originally approved in Application 21029
(MSP; CY2021). In MOD, HomeBase Partners (applicant) desires to change the block frontage
on the north side of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave (to the west) and N. Tracy Ave (to the
east) from Mixed-Landscaped, which requires a 10-foot building setback and boulevard
landscaping, to Mixed-Storefront, which requires no building setback and a 12-foot sidewalk
with tree pits.
After reviewing Application 24606 (MOD), the Bozeman Tree Coalition’s (BTC) opinion is that
MOD does not meet Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) Section 38.230.100 Plan Review Criteria.
Hence, the BTC requests the City of Bozeman’s (City) Community Development Director (CDD)
to deny Application 24606 (MOD).
The burden of proof:
Criterion 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy (aka
Bozeman Community Plan 2020)
Application 24606 (MOD) does not conform to and is not consistent with the following goals of
the City’s adopted growth policy (aka Bozeman Community Plan 2020):
A. Goal EPO-2: Work to ensure that development is responsive to natural features.
Trees, by definition, are natural features. In the City, publicly owned trees—including those
planted in boulevards (aka street trees)—contribute to the ecological function of Bozeman’s
urban forest and contribute to the ecosystem services this forest provides to the Bozeman
community as a whole. Moreover, publicly owned trees are the only City-owned infrastructure
that increases in economic value over time.
The MOD’s Tree Preservation Plan shows that the applicant will be allowed to remove (i.e.,
destroy) all five of the publicly owned street trees in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St
between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave. The City’s Tree Inventory Map shows that there are
five street trees in this boulevard (see Figure 1 on page 9 of this document), and the BTC’s
Daniel Carty visited the MOD site and hand-counted these five street trees. Hence, the
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 2 of 9
applicant’s Public Tree Reimbursement Form is deficient because this form references only four
street trees.
All five of the publicly owned street trees in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N.
Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave. are mature, healthy-appearing green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica)—and from west to east their respective DBHs are 27 in, 24 in, 16 in, 39 in, and
15 in (see City’s Tree Inventory Map). Allowing the applicant to remove these five street trees
does not comply with the intent of development being “responsive to natural features.” Instead,
the applicant should be required to fully protect these five street trees during construction or, if
the applicant cannot do this, the original approved application should be denied.
The BTC knows from email correspondence with City Manager Chuck Winn (Dec 12, 2024) that
the City has “not issued citations under 16.05.330 – Section 4b.” The BTC’s position is that it
should be completely possible for an applicant to perform construction without harming publicly
owned street trees. For example, City Manager Winn wrote, “A current example is the Stockman
Bank project at 8th & Mendenhall. The existing boulevard trees are being preserved outside of
the construction zone with no concerns about them being harmed.” Thus, the MOD applicant
should be required to perform construction without harming the five existing street trees on the
northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave.
Additionally, in a recent email that Angie Kociolek received in her capacity as the North East
Neighborhood Association (NENA) Inter-Neighborhood Council (INC) Representative, City
Senior Planner Danielle Garber wrote, with respect to MOD, that “With subsequent development
the applicant is required to provide replacement boulevard trees, and add boulevard trees
where not currently present. The current preliminary design shows at least 12 replacement trees
(3x the amount currently present) of young, healthy, and genetically diverse trees species that
will be more resilient to diseases and pests, and that will be able to be enjoyed by current
Bozeman residents and future generations.” The BTC contends that this statement is purely
speculative because the survival rate of newly planted “replacement trees” is unpredictable and
often less than 50%. Moreover, as BTC has documented, there are actually five street trees in
the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave; thus,
replacement trees should total 5 x 3 = 15.
Although the MOD applicant may be required to plant up to 15 replacement trees, such trees
are unlikely to thrive or even survive when planted in what is becoming an area with less solar
access because of tall (5- and 6-story) buildings. For example, the BTC’s Daniel Carty, who
often walks along the north side of W. Lamme St, has observed that only one of the street trees
planted in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St. in front of the applicant’s One 11 Lofts has
survived, and this tree appears unhealthy. The BTC acknowledges the City might like to replace
the five mature green ash street trees in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N.
Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave with a variety of tree species; however, these five mature green
ash trees, with established root systems and taller, broader leaf crowns, are likely to fare better
than newly planted saplings.
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 3 of 9
B. Goal EPO-3.9 Integrate climate change considerations into development standards.
If MOD is approved, the five mature green ash trees that will be removed from the northside
boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave will most likely be dumped
in a landfill, thus releasing the carbon they have been storing for decades. It is commonly known
that large trees sequester more carbon than small trees. For decades, replacement trees will
not make up for this loss of carbon storage and not make up for the annual loss of carbon
sequestration. Removing trees and disposing of them in a landfill is in direct conflict with the
City’s goals to reduce the release of carbon into the atmosphere. Even if the five mature green
ash trees were turned into free mulch, their carbon would be released; thus, removing them is
not in keeping with the City’s climate goals. Additionally, standing trees help reduce the heat-
island effect.
The applicant’s Public Tree Reimbursement Form is deficient because it is inaccurate with
regard to the number of street trees to be removed by the applicant, does not specify the
species and DBHs of the street trees to be removed by the applicant, and otherwise does not
provide sufficient detail for substantive public review and comment. The Public Tree
Reimbursement Form reads, in part, “Due to the removal of the existing infrastructure and
replacement with new all four of the existing trees in the W. Lamme public boulevard will be
compromised.” As previously noted in this public comment, the MOD’s Tree Preservation Plan
shows that the applicant will be allowed to remove all five of the publicly owned street trees in
the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave.
Also, the applicant’s Public Tree Reimbursement Form is deficient because it (a) does not
calculate the carbon stored in each of the five street trees to be removed, (b) does not calculate
the annual carbon sequestration for each of these five street trees to be removed, (c) does not
calculate tree canopy area lost, and (d) does not calculate how many years it would take for up
to 15 replacement street trees to achieve, at survival rates of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, what
the existing street trees are achieving with respect to carbon storage, carbon sequestration, and
canopy cover. The applicant should be required to calculate these metrics because these
metrics are crucial to City staff being able to properly evaluate climate change considerations in
this development review.
Finally, the City is actively engaged in Branch Out Bozeman—a project seeking to expand the
City’s urban forest tree canopy. By allowing the unnecessary removal of healthy, publicly owned
trees simply because of a developer’s desire, the City would be adding to its future cost to
achieve an expanded tree canopy cover through planting.
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 4 of 9
Criterion 6. Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4, including:
Community design and element provisions (division 38.410),
Sec. 38.410.010. - General standards. Natural environment. The design and development
of all land uses must be properly related to topography, and must, to the extent possible,
preserve the natural terrain, natural drainage, existing topsoil, trees and other existing
vegetation.
Sec 38.410.010 speaks for itself: “The design and development of all land uses… must, to the
extent possible, preserve the… trees.” The MOD seeks to destroy trees not to preserve (i.e.,
protect) them. The Community Development Director has the discretion not to approve MOD
and instead require the applicant to abide by the originally approved application.
…notably: Lot and block standards;
Both applications’ (21029 and 24606) Block Frontage Standards documents read, “This
landscape street frontage condition will also exist along the south side of the Mountain View
property on Lamme Street, where the mature existing trees will remain.”
Corner lots. Corner lots must have sufficient width to permit appropriate building
setbacks from both streets and provide acceptable visibility for traffic safety.
As BTC understands it, the MOD request is to change its corner lot block frontage to store front
which has no required setback. This appears to be in conflict with the corner lot requirement
above.
Criterion 7. Conformance with the project design provisions of article 5, including:
7.a. - Compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and the
adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative the architectural
design, building mass, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character,
orientation of buildings on the site and visual integration.
Application 24606 (MOD) does not improve the compatibility and sensitivity to the immediate
environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods. The five mature green ash trees in the
northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave are integral to
the existing neighborhood. These trees, having been there for decades, anchor the site, are part
of the existing neighborhood’s identity and landscaping, and add to the neighborhoods historical
character and sense of place. Also, these trees are all that remain of history and can be
considered heritage trees paying homage to the storied past of the “old hospital” site. Instead of
being removed, these five mature green ash trees should be protected from damage during
construction and incorporated into the design to comply with this criterion (see conditions
below). An additional benefit of these trees is a visual screening from the point of view of
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 5 of 9
neighbors south of Lamme looking north. To allow removing them now would be completely
insensitive and call the entire approved MSP and related documents like tree preservation plans
into question.
7.c. - Design and arrangement of elements of the plan (e.g., buildings circulation, open
space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography, natural
water bodies and water courses, existing vegetation, and to contribute to the overall
aesthetic quality of the site configuration.
Application 24606 (MOD) does not comply with 7.c because the MOD building design, if
approved, will result in removal of the five existing street trees and thus not be in harmony with
the existing natural topography.
7.d - Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings, the appearance of vehicular
use, open space and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural
vegetation.
Application 24606 (MOD) does not comply with 7.d because MOD seeks to remove the five
mature green ash street trees in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson
Ave and N. Tracy Ave, when, originally, these five trees were slated to be protected. Any
replacement trees planted in this boulevard are unlikely to thrive or even survive, given that all
but one of the replacement trees on the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St fronting the One
11 Lofts building (one block to the west) have not.
7e. Open Space, including
The code refers to Article 5, but upon reading it BTC cannot find any references to open space.
A boulevard, while small in comparison to a park, still acts as public open space. Approving
MOD would deny Bozeman residents access to the shade and aesthetics currently offered
along W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave.
Application 24606 (MOD) lies within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
(NCOD, BMC 38.340 – Overlay District Standards).
Removing the five mature green ash trees on the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between
N Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave does not comply with BMC DIVISION 38.110. ADOPTED
PLANS, STANDARDS AND RESOLUTIONS, Sec. 38.110.010. Plans, standards and resolutions
adopted by reference, B. [Bozeman] Guidelines for historic preservation and neighborhood
conservation overlay district. In the Bozeman Guidelines for Historic Preservation and
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (Jan 17, 2006, amended Jul 13, 2015),
Per City Senior Planner Danielle Garber’s email, “The master site plan review and staff report,
which may be viewed in the above link for application 21029, included a certificate of
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 6 of 9
appropriateness for proposed development within the NCOD. The review criteria for subsequent
development are primarily located under Subchapter 4B in the Guidelines for Historic
Preservation & The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. Criteria in this chapter that are
affected by the proposed MOD are primarily site design, street design, and landscaping design.”
First, Chapter 2. Design Guidelines for All Properties, reads:
Page 42: “Respect historic settlement patterns. Site a new building such that it is arranged on its
site in a way similar to historic buildings in the area. This includes consideration of building
setbacks and open space.”
Arguably, the entire approved North Central Master Site Plan project does not respect historic
settlement patterns. Changing the approved block frontage to remove setbacks and open space
would unleash yet another damaging effect on the existing neighborhood, which is within the
NCOD. Be that as it may, the new building should be arranged on its site in a way similar to the
historic low-income housing building on the northeast corner of W. Lamme St and N. Willson
Ave.
Page 47: “Continue the pattern of street trees in a block. Because street trees serve various
aesthetic and practical functions, they should be maintained. Existing street trees should be
preserved, when feasible.”
The BTC contends that it is feasible to preserve (i.e., protect) the five mature green ash trees in
the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave. The
applicant’s desire to remove these five trees is not a compelling reason to destroy these green-
infrastructure assets of the Bozeman community at large.
Page 48: Landscape Design Policy:
“Traditionally, plant beds were located around building foundations, along walkways, and
sometimes in front of fences. Some of these plantings may have historic significance and should
be retained to the extent feasible. Mature trees may also contribute to the historic landscape
and should be preserved.
1. Preserve and maintain mature trees and significant vegetation within all corridors.
a. Include existing vegetation as part of a landscape design scheme where appropriate.
b. In development areas, healthy trees and vegetation clusters should be identified
for preservation.
i. Special consideration should be given to mature trees, 6 inches or greater
in diameter, and to vegetation clusters with significant visual impact.
ii. Vegetation designated for preservation should be incorporated into new
development site designs to the maximum extent possible.”
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 7 of 9
The five mature green ash trees in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson
Ave and N. Tracy Ave contribute to the historic “old hospital” landscape and should be
preserved. All of these trees are much greater than 6 inches in diameter (see City’s Tree
Inventory Map), and thus they should be given special consideration for preservation and
maintenance. Additionally, the three center-most-located of these five trees collectively create a
visual impact. These trees were designated for preservation in the approved Master Site Plan,
and it is the right thing to require the applicant to incorporate them.
Chapter 4B
Page 1: “Housing—for all income levels—should be encouraged by a variety of methods to
support the continued economic vitality of the Downtown Bozeman business district, which is
broadly recognized as one of Bozeman’s strongest assets.”
The BTC’s understanding is that MOD is intended to become a hotel, not housing. However, the
“housing for all income levels” would be refreshing.
Page 9: “Streetscape Policy: Maintain the character of the streetscape. This includes a rich
collection of varying street designs, sidewalk types and street trees.”
The MOD application seeks to do away with the boulevard, which is not in keeping with
maintaining the character of the streetscape.
Page 10: “Use of planting strips is encouraged. Planting strips should act as a transition
between public and semipublic spaces. Where planting strips between the curb and sidewalk
exist, they should be maintained.”
The BTC agrees, i.e., where planting strips (e.g., boulevards) between the curb and sidewalk
exist, they should be maintained. The MOD seeks to change to storefront and insert tree pits in
lieu of the existing boulevard, a proposal that should not be approved.
“Continue the pattern of street trees in a block. Because street trees serve various aesthetic and
practical functions, they should be maintained. Existing street trees should be preserved, when
feasible.”
As noted previously in this document, the BTC contends it is thoroughly feasible to preserve
(i.e., protect) the five mature green ash trees in the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St
between N. Willson Ave and N. Tracy Ave.
Page 10: “Landscape Design” seems to be a repeated section in the document.
See BTC’s comments earlier in this document.
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 8 of 9
Additionally, Application 21029 Staff Report, Pg 31, reads, “Preservation principles and goals
are not applicable to the proposed project except at the original Bozeman Deaconess Hospital
at 15 W. Lamme.” “The large mature trees fronting the Deaconess Hospital along West Lamme
St. are proposed to be preserved with this plan.”
BMC Sec. 38.230.100. C.- Plan approval may be denied upon a determination the
application does not meet the criteria of this section. Persons objecting to the
recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof. A denial of approval must
be in writing.
Application 24606 (MOD) does not comply with the review criteria listed above. The BTC has
carried and met the burden of proof for the site plan criteria of concern listed above. As such,
the BTC requests the City to deny Application 24606 (MOD).
Miscellaneous Deficiencies in Application 24606 (MOD)
The Application Summary and MOD Narrative are deficient in plain language and deficient in the
level of detail necessary for the public to understand what MOD seeks to do. The Application
Summary states the project (MOD) is a modification “…to approved Master Site Plan to slightly
adjust phasing, block frontage on one lot, update programming, and tree preservation plan. See
MOD Narrative for additional information.” However, the MOD Narrative does not provide
sufficient information to allow the public to read, understand, and respond to the application in a
substantive way.
Conclusion
After reviewing Application 24606 (MOD), the BTC has provided ample evidence to show that
MOD does not adequately meet the expectations of BMC Section 38.230.100. – Site Plan
Review Criteria, does not comply with BMC Sec. 38.410.010. - General standards. B. Natural
environment, and does not comply with some provisions of BMC 38.340 – NCOD.
Consequently, the BTC requests the City’s Community Development Director to deny this
application.
Finally, the BTC asks that, the Community Development Department hold all developers—
including the MOD applicant—to a higher standard so that all development applications will
include complete and accurate information for the City and the public to review.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Bozeman Tree Coalition
Public Comment on Application No. 24606
March 3, 2025
Page 9 of 9
Sincerely,
Bozeman Tree Coalition co-founders,
Daniel Carty (213 N. 3rd Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715)
Angie Kociolek (620 N. Tracy Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715)
Marcia Kaveney (Bozeman, MT)
cc: Mayor Terry Cunningham, Deputy Mayor Joey Morrison, Commissioners Jennifer Madgic,
Douglas Fischer, and Emma Bode
cc: Erin George, Community Development Director; Danielle Garber, Senior Planner
cc: Mitch Overton, Forestry, Parks, Recreation, and Cemetery Director; Alex Nordquest, City
Forester
cc: Natalie Meyer, Sustainability Program Manager
cc: Sarah Rosenberg, Associate Planner and Historic Preservation Officer
Figure 1: City of Bozeman Tree inventory Map showing five mature green ash “street trees” in
the northside boulevard of W. Lamme St between N. Willson Ave to the west and N. Tracy Ave
to the East.