Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout014 24493 The Guthrie 5th and Villard CCOA DEM SP Project Name: 24493 The Guthrie 5th and Villard CCOA DEM SP Project Description: 24493 The Guthrie 5th and Villard CCOA DEM SP Review Comments List Date: 12/9/2024 Addressing, Cycle 1 Comment: Once all of the requirements and conditions have been satisfied and this is approved, the individual units can be addressed. Community Housing, Cycle 1 Comment: Sec. 38.380.040.A.1.b Include the table in 38.380.020-1 in the Affordable Housing Plan. Sec. 38.380.040A.c Include the number of bedrooms in each proposed affordable home and market-rate homes. Sec. 38.380.040.A.1.e Include the location of affordable lots in the Affordable Housing Plan. Sec. 38.380.040.A.1.g Include a detailed description of requested incentives. Specifically: 38.380.030.3.f. 5) Section 38.530.050 building detail standards. Please elaborate. Sec 38.380.040.2.c Include description of shared amenities in the Affordable Housing Plan. Sec. 38.380.040.E Include the Affordable Housing Plan Application and Agreement in the Affordable Housing Plan. Please contact rmunfrada@bozeman.net Additionally, please note that the Notice of Deed Restrictions and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants must be executed prior to final SP approval. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:26 AM See updated document '09 Affordable Housing Plan' which now includes requested information. Acknowledged that the Notice of Deed Restrictions and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants will be executed prior to final Site Plan Approval. Engineering, Cycle 1 Markup: ENG - service caps , 10 Civil Engineering Report.pdf DSSP Section V.A.6.h - Please add, that any curb boxes or valve boxes on the existing lines to be demolished and caped at the main should be removed. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:32 AM This requirement has been added to the demolition notes on Sheet C1.0, and the Engineering Report. Engineering, Cycle 1 Markup: ENG - cut in manhole , 10 Civil Engineering Report.pdf Please include the SS cut in manhole to the infrastructure improvements. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:32 AM This requirement has been added to the concurrent construction requirements on Sheet C1.1, and the Engineering Report. Engineering, Cycle 1 Markup: ENG - fire flow , 10 Civil Engineering Report.pdf DSSP Section V The water distribution system must be designed to meet the maximum day demand plus fire flow and the peak hour demand. Add fire flow. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:33 AM This information has been added to the Engineering Report. Engineering, Cycle 1 Library Comment: BMC 38.410.130. Water Adequacy: The development will need to satisfy the water adequacy code requirement prior to a future site plan approval. If sufficient water rights cant be provided to offsets the development's annual demand then a cash-in-lieu of water rights (CILWR) payment will be required. The City assesses the CILWR fee at a rate of $6,000 per acre-foot. The fee determination will take place during the site plan review, however if there are any questions or if a preliminary review is desired please contact Griffin Nielsen with the Engineering/Utilities Department directly at gnielsen@bozeman.net or (406) 582-2279. The City encourages the use of groundwater wells to supply irrigation demands, which in turn will reduce the CILWR fee. Applicant must obtain a pre-determination from the DNRC demonstrating that a well groundwater well may be permitted under Montanas exempt appropriation or that provide the water right documentation if existing prior to finalization of the CILWR fee determination. Finally, the City would like to make the owner aware of an available CILWR rebate of approximately 20% for residential units if high- efficiency fixtures (toilets, washers, and shower heads) meeting the City Water Conservation Division standards are installed. The rebate would be released at occupancy and requires an agreement defining the terms and amount rebate be finalized and executed prior to final plan approval. If the owner is interested or has any questions please reach out to Griffin Nielsen. Reviewer Response: Mikaela Schultz - 11/4/24 2:49 PM Final approval and execution of the rebate should be completed with Griffin Nelson. Receipt of the executed agreement, fee determination, and final CILWR payment is conditional of site plan approval. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:49 AM The applicant emailed Griffin Nielsen on 10/9/24 to get a preliminary estimate for CILWR. Also attached to that email was the draft CILWR rebate form that the developer is interested in proceeding with. See updated document "25 CILWR Efficiency Rebate Agreement". The final version will be executed prior to final site plan approval. Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: BMC 38.400.060.B.4. Level of Service Standards (LOS)- The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study that identifies that minor approaches to the intersections of North 7th Avenue with West Villard Street and West Beall Street are expected to operate with a LOS of "D". The applicant must complete a signal warrant analysis at these two locations and submit to the review authority for final determination on whether the intersections meet the City criteria for an exception or waiver for intersections with an LOS of less than "C". Also, please include conclusive correspondence with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) concerning Systems Impact along the North 7th Avenue corridor, with specific respect to the subject intersections. Reviewer Response: Mikaela Schultz - 11/7/24 3:58 PM An acceptable warrant analysis and conclusive correspondence from MDT has been received and uploaded with this revision cycle. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:38 AM See uploaded document "28 The Guthrie Signal Warrant Study" for requested signal warrant analysis. We have been in contact with Kristina Kilta (Bozeman MDT Transportation Engineer) and she has the Signal Warrant Memo to review. A meeting is being scheduled once MDT has had time to review. Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: TIS recommendations- The stop sign recommended at the access to the site on North 5th Avenue is not necessary. The stop at commercial accesses is implied. Reviewer Response: Mikaela Schultz - 11/7/24 3:55 PM The applicant may install the stop sign in an onsite location outside of the public right of way and it must be maintained privately as part of the site. Stop sign privatization and relocation will be a condition of site plan approval. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:38 AM Understand it is not required, however for pedestrian safety we prefer to keep the stop sign per plan. The placement of the stop sign behind the sidewalk also assists with ensuring egressing vehicles do not stage on the sidewalk blocking pedestrian facilities. Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: Access Spacing Memorandum - 38.400.090.H.d. Site access design - Please include a detail to the review engineer showing the left turn conflict between the access and existing alley on North 5th Avenue. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:38 AM See uploaded document "29 Access Turning Template Figure" which illustrates how left turns out of the Guthrie and out of the Alley maintain clear visions. Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: Access Spacing Memorandum - 38.400.090.3.b.1 - drive access and parking stall dimensions - Please acknowledge and address the site plan deviation from standard commercial drive aisle width and parking stall length in this memorandum. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:38 AM The dimension on the previous plans was incorrect, and has been corrected. The drive aisle width is 24'. Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: BMC 38.270.030.C.1 - Onsite or Adjacent Improvements concurrent construction criteria - The applicant must submit all outstanding concurrent construciton applicaiton deliverables, prior to concurrent construction approval and issuance of a building permit, including the following; 1. Approved infrastructure set - submitted and reviewed per the City of Bozeman Infrastructure Review Process 2. Written approval from the fire marshal 3. Irrevocable offer of dedication - see template uploaded to the City Documents file 4. Concurrent Construction Phasing Plan. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:38 AM Additional concurrent construction narration has been added to Sheet C1.1, the Civil Site Plan. The final concurrent construction criteria will be provided prior to the building permit approval. Engineering, Cycle 1 Markup: ENG - light pole base location , 045 - ES1.1 - ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN.pdf Is there any way this light pole base could be re-located, so the east to west drive aisle meets the minimum width for two way travel? Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:39 AM The dimension on the previous plans was incorrect, and has been corrected. The drive aisle width is 24'. Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: BMC 38.410.060.A.2.- Easements - A 10' Public Utility Easement must be provided along the perimeter of the property along the public street(s). Please find the City Standard Public Utility Easement uploaded in the City documents file for your review, and execution. This easement must be reviewed, approved and executed by the review engineer and the City commission, and filed with the County Clerk and Recorders office, prior to site plan approval. Reviewer Response: Mikaela Schultz - 11/4/24 4:01 PM The draft easement is adequate. Please have the ownership execute the draft and submit the executed hard copy to the review engineer for final review and approval. Site plan approval will be conditional of the review engineers final approval, City commission approval and final execution, and filing with the County Clerk and Recorders office. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:40 AM Updated easements with wording matching the City template is provided. Easements will be recorded prior to site plan approval. See document "21 Utility Easement - 10 feet" Engineering, Cycle 1 Comment: BMC 38.410.060.A.2- Prior to further review, the applicant must provide a draft copy of the public street and utility easement granting additional right-of-way along 5th Avenue for review. The easement must use the City standard template. The template has been provided in the City Documents and Staff Reports folder. Reviewer Response: Mikaela Schultz - 11/4/24 4:01 PM The draft easement is adequate. Please have the ownership execute the draft and submit the executed hard copy to the review engineer for final review and approval. Site plan approval will be conditional of the review engineers final approval, City commission approval and final execution, and filing with the County Clerk and Recorders office. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:41 AM Updated easements with wording matching the City template is provided. Easements will be recorded prior to site plan approval. See document "22 Public Street and Utility Easement - 4 feet" Engineering, Cycle 1 Library Comment: The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SIDs) on City standard record Form prior to site plan approval. The City Standard Template has been uploaded to the City Documents File for review and execution. Reviewer Response: Mikaela Schultz - 11/4/24 3:53 PM Please populate the notary block in this draft, and then execute the SID waiver. Submit the owner executed hard copy to the review engineer for final review, approval and execution by the City commission and filing with the County Clerk and recorder's office. Final site plan approval is conditional of receipt and filing of the waiver with the County Clerk and Recorder. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:49 AM See updated document "17 Waiver of Right to Protest DRAFT". The final version will be recorded prior to Site Plan Approval Engineering, Cycle 1 Markup: ENG - Drive Approach Detail , 018 - C1.4 - SITE DETAILS.pdf BMC 38.400.090.b. - Commercial Drive Access - Please remove the residential driveway approach detail and replace it with the City Standard Non-Residential (Commercial) Driveway approach detail prior to site plan approval and infrastructure submittal. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:51 AM The approach detail on Sheet C1.4 has been updated to a non-residential driveway approach. Engineering, Cycle 2 Markup: ENG - CCON note #1 , 015 - C1.1 - CIVIL SITE PLAN.pdf Please confirm this note with written approval from the fire marshal, prior to concurrent construction approval and final building permit approval. The Concurrent Construction Phasing notes as written are otherwise generally acceptable. Please be advised that any delays to building construction milestones due to the inaccuracy, incompleteness, or revision of the infrastructure plan set will not be the responsibility of the City. Engineering, Cycle 2 Markup: ENG - Concurrent Construction Plan , 015 - C1.1 - CIVIL SITE PLAN.pdf No reference to the roundabout traffic calming improvement have been made in these phasing plan notes. Include reference to the roundabout improvements in this concurrent construction plan and on this drawing conditional of site plan approval. Fire Department, Cycle 1 Comment: Provide a more comprehensive narrative for concurrent construction. Provide exhibit specifying fire lane signage. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:52 AM Additional concurrent construction narration has been added to Sheet C1.1, the Civil Site Plan. The fire lane signage has been updated on Sheet C1.7, the Signage and Striping Plan, to address the end of the fire lane. Parks Department, Cycle 1 Markup: Parks, 14 Parkland Narrative and Prelim Table.pdf Please add some additional narrative information on your cash in lieu request. Please include a section in the narrative that specifically requests to provide cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication, cite the proper code section that allows to you make that request (Sec. 38.420.030), and then cite any criteria that you are using to justify your CILP request from the commissions ordinance. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:55 AM See updated document "14 Parkland Narrative and Prelim Table" for requested information. Parks Department, Cycle 1 Markup: Parks, 14 Parkland Narrative and Prelim Table.pdf Please see revised parkland tracking table provided in city documents folder. The current CILP value is $2.65. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:55 AM See updated document "14 Parkland Narrative and Prelim Table" for updated tracking table. Parks Department, Cycle 2 Comment: CILP payment must be made prior to final site plan approval. Planning, Cycle 1 Markup: Clarify office space, 004 - A0.12 - OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS -INTERIOR AMENITIES.pdf Clarify if this office space is a coworking space or an office for on site management. Office space for on site management cannot count towards open space requirements. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:56 AM The office space (room 130) has been excluded from the open space calculations. See updated drawing "004 - A0.12 - OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS -INTERIOR AMENITIES" Planning, Cycle 1 Markup: Error, 047 - ES1.3 - BUILDING ELEVATIONS PHOTOMETRICS.pdf Is the 205.7 fc an error? Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:56 AM The 205.7FC is not an error, the calculation point happened to fall directly below the wall mounted light fixture capturing the bright spot on the wall directly below the light fixture. There is no maximum level requirements for one point, and the average across the South Building Facade is 0.5FC. Planning, Cycle 1 Markup: Update narrative, 06 Project and DEM Narrative.pdf Update the narrative so that the incentives being requested aren't covered. Don't list out all incentives, just the ones that are being used and clearly state how the project is usign them. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:56 AM The narrative has been updated to clarify the incentives that are being requested, excluding those that are not being requested. See updated document "06 Project and DEM Narrative" Planning, Cycle 2 Comment: BMC section 38.340.090.D.3 applies to this application because a previous demolition, COA and Site plan application (23354) was denied in part on failure to meet criteria found in BMC section 38.340.090.C, specifically subsection 3 whether the subsequent development complies with section 38.340.050. The two-year stay [on issuance of a demolition permit] may be terminated at any point in time if an alternate proposal is approved or if sufficient additional evidence is presented to otherwise satisfy the requirements of this section. BMC 38.340.090.D.3. This application, 24493, constitutes an alternative proposal that, if approved, terminates the two- year stay on issuance of a demolition permit. In addition to other relevant criteria found within Chapter 38 of the BMC, to be approved this application must demonstrate compliance with all relevant criteria within BMC division 38.340. These criteria include those found in BMC 38.340.090.C. and 38.340.050.C, D, and E. Note that subsections A and B of 38.340.050 are inapplicable because this application proposes construction of a new structure, rather than preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction of an existing historic building (as provided in subsection A), or alteration to an existing building (as provided in subsection B). Additionally, subsection F is inapplicable because no tax abatement certificate of appropriateness is sought in this application. Please supplement this application with additional information regarding compliance with the relevant criteria listed above. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 11/26/24 3:19 PM See updated document "32 Certificate of Appropriateness" for detailed responses to each NCOD Guideline as requested. Reviewer Response: Sarah Rosenberg - 11/21/24 3:37 PM The document should explicitly outline the separate guidelines/subsections under each section. For instance, use headings such as A. Topic, followed by Guideline 1, Guideline 2, Guideline 3, etc. Clearly indicate how each guideline is being addressed. If a guideline is not feasible or applicable, explicitly state that—similar to how some points are explained in the accompanying narrative. Specifically, for the multi-household section, each subsection must be addressed in greater detail, clearly explaining how the requirements are being met or why they do not apply, while also demonstrating how they align with the policy introduced at the beginning of each section. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 11/20/24 11:10 AM See uploaded document "32 Certificate of Appropriateness" for responses to 38.340.050.C,D, and E. Reviewer Response: Sarah Rosenberg - 11/19/24 10:23 AM The narrative provided outlines how it addresses 38.340.090.D.3 but it also needs to include how the application demonstrates compliance with Standards for Certificate of Appropriateness. 38.340.050.C,D, and E. C. Contemporary, non-period and innovative design of new structures and additions to existing structures is encouraged when such new construction or additions do not destroy significant historical, cultural or architectural structures or their components and when such design is compatible with the foregoing elements of the structure and surrounding structures. D. When applying the standards of subsections A through C of this section, the review authority must be guided by the design guidelines for the neighborhood conservation overlay district. Application of the design guidelines may vary by property as explained in the introduction to the design guidelines. When reviewing a contemporary, non-period, or innovative design for new structures or additions to existing structures, the review authority must be guided by the design guidelines for the neighborhood conservation overlay district to determine whether the proposal is compatible with any existing or surrounding structures. The NCOD Design Guidelines that would be applicable to this application is chapter 2, Design Guidelines for all properties and chapter 3, design guidelines for residential character areas, multi-household design. E. Conformance with other applicable development standards of this chapter. Development in the NCOD must comply with all other applicable development standards of this chapter. Include an analysis on how the development complies with these criteria. Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 11/13/24 8:47 AM See uploaded document "31 Early Termination of Two Year Stay" for responses. Planning, Cycle 5 Comment: Send to oversight for public notice 12/6-12/30. Solid Waste, Cycle 1 Markup: SLD Waste, 034 - A1.01 - SITE PLAN.pdf 1. must be written into covenants that it is managements responsibility to move trash containers to the tip sight on collection day. 2.tip pad must be heated. 3. must have 50 foot straight approach to the tip pad. no parking allowed within the straight approach. 4. will need a turn around for refuse truck we cannot back out onto street, Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 10:59 AM The Architectural Site Plan, A1.01 has been updated to show the trash loading area (tip pad) at the street, and heated sidewalk from the trash room to this location. This enables the trash to be picked up with a 50' straight approach, without entering the parking lot or requiring a turn around. Covenants will be written specifying it is management's responsibility to move trash containers to tip sight on collection day. Transportation, Cycle 1 Comment: BMC 38.540.050.5.c: Exterior bicycle parking location should be within 50 feet of an entrance to a building and ideally a main entrance like the one on the NE corner of the project site. The two racks on the southern end of the building should be expanded to allow more short term use by more occupants or visitors. The exterior bicycle parking on the west side of the building is hidden on an alley access and is not visible from the main street. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Comment: A signed copy of the Building Permit Landscape & Irrigation Self-Certification Form (Appendix E) is necessary to receive a building permit. See the "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual" - 3.1.2 Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Comment: Prior to commencing any work, the applicant must contact the Water Conservation Division to schedule a preinstallation meeting. Include a note on the landscaping and irrigation plans that the applicant’s team will need to schedule this preinstallation meeting. See the "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual" - 3.1.2 Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Plant Factor, 022 - L 001 - Notes and Legends.pdf Deschampsia cespitosa is considered a .6 plant factor by the City of Bozeman Water Conservation Division Plant List. When the prescriptive pathway has been selected by the applicant all landscaped areas other than turf grass must consist solely of low and/or very low water vegetation (plant factor of 0.3 or less). See "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.2.1 "Landscape Design Standards", Prescriptive Landscape Design Pathway (percentage-based approach), 1), b). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:00 AM Deschampsia cespitosa has been replaced with Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' which has a 0.1 plant factor. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Riser Height, 033 - L 701 - Irrigation Details.pdf Hunter PROS-4 has a 4" riser. Overhead irrigation must use a 6â minimum riser. See âCity of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manualâ, Section 3.3.1 âIrrigation Design Standardsâ, âSprinklers/Overhead Irrigationâ, 4). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:00 AM Overhead irrigation has been revised to specify Hunter PROS-06 that uses a 6"riser. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Layout, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Current head layout does not achieve head to head coverage. Overhead irrigation spacing must be designed to achieve head to head coverage. See âCity of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manualâ, Section 3.3.1 âIrrigation Design Standardsâ, âSprinklers/Overhead Irrigationâ 5). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:00 AM The overall irrigation plan has been updated to achieve the required head to head coverage. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Sprinkler Head Hardscape Spacing, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Sprinkler heads must be spaced a minimum of 2" from hardscape edges per City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual Section 3.3.1, Sprinklers/Overhead Irrigation, 3). Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Drip Irrigation Flush, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Drip irrigation must be installed with the ability to easily flush the line. See âCity of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manualâ, Section 3.3.1 âIrrigation Design Standardsâ, âDrip Irrigationâ, 4) Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Comment: Irrigation Water Requirement (IWR) is missing. See City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual Section 3.3.3, Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design for Final Plat and Site Plan 1). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:01 AM IWR table has been included on the L600 Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Zone Flow, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Not all irrigation zones labels include their flow rate. See "City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3 "Irrigation Design plan Requirements", "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 3), i). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:01 AM All irrigation zone labels now include the flow rate. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Irrigation Control Valves, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Revise plans to include make, model, size, and quantity of the irrigation control valves. See "City of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 2), g). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:01 AM Irrigation control valve spec and quantities have been added to the table on L601. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Backflow Device, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Revise plans to include make, model, and quantity of the backflow prevention device. See "City of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 2), b). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:01 AM Backflow preventer spec and quantity has been added to the table on L601. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Isolation Valves, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Revise plans to include make, model, size, and quantity of the isolation valves. See "City of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 2), f). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:01 AM Isolation valve spec and quantities have been added to the table on L601. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Drip Irrigation Filter and Pressure Regulator, 032 - L 700 - Irrigation Details.pdf Revise plans to include make, model, size, and quantity of pressure regulators and filters for drip irrigation. See "City of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 2), f). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:01 AM Drip pressure regulator spec and quantities have been added to the table on L601. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 1 Markup: WTRCON Drip Irrigation, 031 - L 601 - Overall Irrigation Plan.pdf Revise plans to include make, model, and size of the drip irrigation that will be used. See "City of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 2), j). Reviewer Response: Eric Neustrup - 10/24/24 3:19 PM Make and model of drip irrigation must be included in the irrigation schedule. See "City of Bozeman landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards Manual", Section 3.3.3, "Required Elements of the Irrigation System Design Plan for Final Plat or Site Plan", 2), j). Responded by: Lindsey Von Seggern - 10/16/24 11:02 AM Drip irrigation spec has been added to the table on L601. Water Conservation Division, Cycle 2 Comment: Pressure regulating devices must be installed to ensure proper operation. This may be accomplished by using pressure regulators at the zone valve or integrated into the sprinkler body. See “City of Bozeman Landscape and Irrigation Performance and Design Standards manual”, Section 3.3.1 “Irrigation Design Standards”, “System” 3). Water Rights, Cycle 1 Comment: BMC 38.410.130. Water Adequacy: The project's estimated annual municipal demand from the project is 11.43 acre-feet. A credit volume of 01.71 acre-feet has been applied based on the historic metered demand from the properties reducing the development's demand to 9.72 acre-feet which must be offset. At the City's current CILWR fee rate of $6,000/AF the CILWR fee for the project is $58,339. Payment must be made prior to the final site plan approval. The City would like to make the owner aware of an available CILWR rebate of approximately 20% for residential units, released at occupancy if high-efficiency fixtures (toilets, washers, and shower heads) are installed. A rebate agreement template outlining the terms of the rebate offer has been uploaded. If the owner is interested please update the agreement using track changes with the owner information and send the word document to Griffin Nielsen at gnielsen@bozeman.net. If there are any questions about the agreement please reach out over email. The agreement should be finalized prior to final plan approval.