Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-27-24 - Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization - Agendas & Packet MaterialsA. Call to Order - 1:00 p.m. B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes C.1 Approval of the October 23, 2024 Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes(Butts) D. Public Comments E. New Business E.1 Approval of the Long Range Transportation Plan Scope of Work (Butts) THE GALLATIN VALLEY MPO - TRANSPORTATION POLICY COORDINATING COMMITTEE OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA TPCC AGENDA Wednesday, November 27, 2024 General information about the Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee can be found in our Laserfiche repository. If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to comments@bozeman.net or by visiting the Public Comment Page prior to 12:00pm on the day before the meeting. Public comments will also be accepted through Video Conference during the appropriate agenda items. Recordings of the meeting will be available through the Commission's video page. For more information please contact Nick Ross, nross@bozeman.net This meeting will be held using an online videoconferencing system. You can join this meeting: Via Video Conference: Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting. Via Phone: This is for listening only +1 719 359 4580 Access code: 982 8814 3813 This is the time to comment on any non-agenda matter falling within the scope of the Metropolitan Planning Organization. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public comment relating to that item but you may only speak once per topic. Please note, the Committee cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the Committee shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful of others. Please state your name and place of residence in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three minutes. General public comments to the Committee can be found on their Laserfiche repository page. 1 F. General Discussion F.1 Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (GVMPO) Staff Update (Butts) G. Adjournment Consider the Motion: I move to approve the Long Range Transportation Plan Scope of Work. This Committee generally meets the fourth Wednesday of every month from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. All meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, David Arnado, at 406.582.3232. 2 Memorandum REPORT TO:Gallatin Valley MPO - Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee FROM:Jeff Butts, MPO Manager SUBJECT:Approval of the October 23, 2024 Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes MEETING DATE:November 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:I move to approve the October 23, 2024 Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.1 Outreach: Continue to strengthen and innovate in how we deliver information to the community and our partners. BACKGROUND:Minutes from the October 23, 2024 Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As recommended by the committee. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: 102324 Gallatin Valley MPO TPCC Meeting Minutes Report compiled on: October 25, 2024 3 Gallatin Valley MPO TPCC Meeting Minutes, October 23, 2024 Page 1 of 3 THE GALLATIN VALLEY MPO TPCC MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES October 23, 2024 A. Call to Order B. 00:00:30 Roll Call Present: Terry Cunningham, Douglas Fischer, Neil Cardwell (Russell Nelson Designee), Geno Liva (Brandon Jones Designee), Danae Giannetti Absent: Scott Macfarlane, Mark Egge Excused: None Mayor Cunningham was late to the meeting but joined after the approval of minutes. Others present at the meeting; Jeff Butts, Marcy Yeykal, Sunshine Ross, Emma Belmont, Beth Clarkson, Geoff Streeter, Ken Winegar, Ralph Zimmer, Marilee Brown, Katie Potts, Lisa Fischer. C. 00:01:10 Approval of Minutes C.1 Approval of the September 25, 2024, Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes (Butts) 00:01:14 Motion to approve C.1 Approval of the September 25, 2024, Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes (Butts) Danae Giannetti: Motion Neil Cardwell (Russell Nelson Designee): 2nd 00:02:11 Vote on the Motion to approve C.1 Approval of the September 25, 2024, Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization TPCC Meeting Minutes (Butts) The Motion carried 4 - 0. 4 Gallatin Valley MPO TPCC Meeting Minutes, October 23, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Approve: Douglas Fischer Neil Cardwell (Russell Nelson Designee) Geno Liva (Brandon Jones Designee) Danae Giannetti Disapprove: None D. 00:05:01 Public Comments There was no public comment. E. New Business E.1 00:05:30 Update on Administration of Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Urbanized Area MPO Manager, Jeff Butts presented the Update on Administration of Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program Urbanized Area to the committee. 00:15:01 Questions of Staff 00:16:41 Public Comment 00:16:53 Marilee Brown, Public Comment Marilee Brown commented on the application process for the TA Grant and how the MPO will decide who should get the funding. F. General Discussion F.1 00:20:44 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Scope of Work (SOW) Progress Report (Butts) MPO Manager, Jeff Butts presented the Long-Range Plan (LRTP) Scope of Work (SOW) Progress Report to the committee. 00:31:20 Questions of Staff 00:47:24 Public Comment 00:47:41 Marilee Brown, Public Comment Marilee Brown commented on the community involvement and how she feels the public is never heard. F.2 00:50:26 Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (GVMPO) Staff Update (Butts) MPO Manager, Jeff Butts presented the Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (GVMPO) Staff Update to the committee. 5 Gallatin Valley MPO TPCC Meeting Minutes, October 23, 2024 Page 3 of 3 00:53:04 Questions of Staff 00:56:06 Public Comment There was no public comment. 00:56:23 Mayor Cunningham brought up that the next two meetings for the MPO will fall around the holidays and would like to discuss if the committee will be around the day before Thanksgiving to be able to have one of the two meeting. Staff will send out a google poll to determine if the November 27th meeting will work for the committee to still meet. The December meeting will be cancelled. G. 00:58:32 Adjournment This Committee generally meets the fourth Wednesday of every month from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. 6 Memorandum REPORT TO:Gallatin Valley MPO - Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee FROM:Jeff Butts, MPO Manager SUBJECT:Approval of the Long Range Transportation Plan Scope of Work MEETING DATE:November 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Administration RECOMMENDATION:Consider the Motion: I move to approve the Long Range Transportation Plan Scope of Work. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.3 Public Agencies Collaboration: Foster successful collaboration with other public agencies and build on these successes. BACKGROUND:The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is required to adopt a Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) by December 29, 2026. The attached Scope of Work (SOW), recommended for approval by the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC), outlines all required tasks and includes an additional transit component funded by the Urban Transportation District (UTD). The project is anticipated to follow an 18-month timeline. Consultants are proposed to participate in committee and board meetings: quarterly with the Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee (TPCC), bimonthly with TTAC, and three times with the UTD Board. Public involvement is proposed to be guided by a forthcoming Public Participation Plan (PPP) and supported by a project-specific Community Advisory Panel (CAP). If approved, staff proposes initiating the procurement process in December, with TTAC advising the consultant selection process in January. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the committee. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Attachments: GVMPO_LRTP_SOW_TPCC-final-draft.pdf Report compiled on: November 20, 2024 7 GALLATIN VALLEY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN SCOPE OF WORK I. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION The Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (GVMPO) seeks consulting services to develop its inaugural Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA encompasses the Cities of Bozeman and Belgrade, as well as a portion of Gallatin County. The boundary map is available at: MPO About webpage. The LRTP will guide transportation development for at least a 20-year horizon, outlining strategies for a safe, efficient, and connected multimodal transportation system. As the first LRTP, this project presents new opportunities while building upon existing plans. This plan will primarily focus on existing and proposed transportation facilities—including major roadways, transit systems, intercity bus services, multimodal and intermodal hubs, nonmotorized options, and connections between different modes of transport to ensure an integrated transportation system. The plan should place special emphasis on facilities that serve important national and regional transportation functions. The plan must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements – including, but not limited to, the entirety of 23 CFR 450. The project will be completed within 18 months. The plan must be formally adopted by December 29, 2026. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES I. Task 1 — Project Management and Administration 1. Project Initiation and Coordination A. Establish biweekly project manager meetings between the consultant project manager and GVMPO staff for status updates, action items, and key issues. The meetings will include others as needed. i. Between scheduled meetings, use email or ad-hoc virtual meetings for minor decision-making or updates. ii. Meetings will adhere to project timelines, timely needs, and review of deliverables. B. Develop a detailed project management plan outlining timelines, milestones, deliverables tracking, and communication protocols. i. Include a Gantt Chart to visualize the overall project development timelines, incorporating at a minimum key milestones and deliverables, community engagement events, and decision points. 8 2. Monthly Progress Reporting A. Provide comprehensive monthly progress reports, including: i. Detailed description of services rendered. ii. Dates of services. iii. Monthly invoice. a. Hours worked and corresponding hourly rates. b. Overview of total budget and remaining budget. c. Percentage of task completion and percent of budget utilization. d. Task 4 – Additional Transit Focus is contingent upon approved agreements, as advised at the top of Task 4. e. Any additional required information. 3. Quality Assurance and Control A. Develop and implement Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) plan to ensure all deliverables meet high standards. 4. Deliverables A. Project management plan. B. Meeting schedules, agendas, and minutes. C. Monthly progress reports. D. QA/QC plan. II. Task 2 — Community Engagement 1. Public Involvement A. Engagement Strategy i. GVMPO is currently developing its Public Participation Plan (PPP). Community engagement efforts will be aligned with the finalized PPP, which will define the exact activities and meet the requirements of 23 CFR 450.316. ii. An adopted PPP is anticipated for March or April 2025. B. Community Advisory Panel (CAP) i. Be prepared to incorporate a CAP composed of local residents to provide input and guidance at key points. Align CAP meetings with project milestones and plan for consultant team participation. ii. This will serve in an advisory capacity with final decisions and directives made by the TPCC. iii. The MPO will lead the identification and selection of participants. 2. Stakeholder Coordination The development of this plan will require coordination and consultation with several entities, including but not limited to state and local agencies responsible for land use management, natural resources, environmental protection, conservation, and historic preservation, among others. 9 The development and oversight of the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) will be managed by the following bodies: A. Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee (TPCC): The MPO’s governing body consisting of elected officials and representatives from multiple jurisdictions. i. Meets virtually on the fourth Wednesday of the month. The GVMPO staff will provide regular updates; key consultant team members are estimated to need to attend approximately once every three months. ii. Provides policy direction and final approval of the LRTP. iii. The TPCC will be the primary body to adopt the LRTP. B. Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC): Provides technical expertise and recommendations to the MPO with staff from multiple jurisdictions. i. Meets virtually on the second Wednesday of the month. GVMPO staff will provide routine updates; key project team members will likely need to attend bimonthly. ii. The TTAC will be the primary body to provide technical input into plan development. C. Streamline / Urban Transportation District (UTD) Board: Oversees transit-related initiatives and policies. i. Meets monthly, typically the fourth Wednesday, both in-person and virtually. Key consultant team members may need to attend approximately three times with a focus on transit-related items. ii. If contingent agreements are in place to utilize FTA Section 5303 Funds, this will be the primary body to provide direction on Task 4 – Additional Transit Focus. iii. The UTD will be the primary entity providing transit-related direction. D. Local Jurisdictions: Including the Cities of Bozeman, Belgrade, and Gallatin County. i. GVMPO staff will provide updates to non-MPO governing bodies as needed, using existing materials. Consultant attendance is likely unnecessary for these meetings but could be necessary. E. Other Jurisdictions: Includes and is not limited to Federal, State, and Tribal entities. 3. Deliverables A. Community engagement plan and implementation. 10 III. Task 3 — Existing and Projected Conditions Most items in Task III must be projected to at least a 20-year planning horizon and must meet the requirements of 23 CFR 450.324(f). 1. Review of Existing Plans A. Review and ensure adherence to relevant plans from the City of Bozeman, City of Belgrade, Gallatin County, Streamline/Urban Transportation District, and other relevant regional entities. These plans include, but are not limited to the following: i. 2013 City of Bozeman Community Safety Transportation Plan ii. 2017 City of Bozeman Transportation Master Plan iii. 2020 Bozeman Climate Action Plan iv. 2022 Bozeman SAFE Plan v. 2023 City of Bozeman Parks, Recreation, and Active Transportation (PRAT) Plan vi. 2023 City of Bozeman Belonging in Bozeman – Equity & Inclusion Plan vii. 2019 Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan viii. 2017 City of Belgrade Long Range Transportation Plan ix. 2021 Gallatin County Triangle Trails Plan x. 2022 Gallatin County Greater Triangle Area Transportation Plan xi. 2024 Streamline Transit Development Plan xii. Streamline Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) xiii. 2014 MDT Montana Rest Area Plan xiv. 2017 MDT TranPlanMT xv. 2010 MDT Montana State Rail Plan xvi. 2019 MDT Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan xvii. 2020 MDT Montana Comprehensive Highway Safety Plan (CHSP) xviii. 2022 MDT Transportation Asset Management Plan xix. 2021 MDT ADA Transition Plan Update xx. 2022 MDT Montana Freight Plan xxi. 2023 MDT & DEQ Montana Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Deployment Plan / National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) xxii. MDT Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) xxiii. 2020 Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport Master Plan xxiv. Additional plans, documents, and programs that may be required under 23 CFR 450.306(d)(4), 23 CFR 450.324(g), and 23 CFR 450.324(h). 2. Transportation Infrastructure A. Compile data from existing sources to review the following: 11 i. Roadways: roadway networks, classifications, congestion, traffic flow, and pavement conditions. ii. Bridges: identify bridge locations and pavement conditions for those on the National Bridge Inventory (NBI). iii. Transit Systems: review transit infrastructure and services, including routes, schedules, programs, and ridership data. iv. Non-Motorized Modes: Evaluate pedestrian and bicycle networks, including sidewalks, bikeways, paved paths, and trails. B. Additional items required to ensure compliance with 23 CFR 450.324(e) and 450.324(f), as well as any other applicable regulations. C. As this is the MPO’s first LRTP, certain datasets may be incomplete or unavailable. This could require additional efforts to gather or refine the necessary information. 3. Land Use and Zoning A. Review existing land use, zoning, and development trends. B. Map population and employment densities across the MPA. C. Connect to current and projected transportation demands for people and goods 4. Demographics and Environmental Justice A. Research, document, and analyze population growth trends, age distribution, income levels, vehicle ownership, and other key demographic factors. B. Utilizing Census data, identify environmental justice and disadvantaged populations, including individuals with limited English proficiency, low- income households, persons experiencing disabilities, senior populations, minority groups, and zero-vehicle households to ensure compliance with Title VI and environmental justice requirements. 5. Travel Patterns for All Modes A. Document travel patterns within, into, and out of the MPA. B. Using a high-level MPO level lens of the collector and arterial network, and as budget permits, consider the potential following: i. General time-of-day travel distributions and peak hours. ii. Travel time reliability and traffic flows. iii. Key areas of congestion and bottlenecks. iv. Volumes, capacities, and multi-modal level-of-service. C. Consultants will use GIS to overlay walking, bicycling infrastructure, and transit routes, identifying where they intersect to generate First/Final Mile (FFM) radii around those points. D. Utilizing available estimates, e.g., American Community Survey (ACS) data, document the percentage of commute trips by each mode, including walking, bicycling, driving, transit, and telecommuting. 12 6. Safety Analysis A. Utilize available state resources to assess crash data, with a focus on high injury networks and fatal/serious injury crashes. Given this is the MPO's inaugural LRTP, some data may require additional effort for acquisition and validation. B. Assess the feasibility of, and where practical, document and evaluate the residential origins of vehicles involved in crashes within the MPA. 7. Freight and Goods Movement A. Identify, review, and analyze key freight routes, inter-modal centers, and heavy vehicle volumes within the MPA. 8. Environmental and Natural Resources A. Review, incorporate the following into transportation planning and analysis: i. Utilize Gallatin Valley Sensitive Lands Plan as primary resource. ii. Natural resources, floodways, protected areas, and other environmental constraints affecting transportation planning. B. Provide current air quality data and assess potential environmental impacts. C. Consider environmental mitigation activities and proposed areas for these activities as required in 23 CFR 450.324(f)(9). 9. Economic Activity 10. Deliverables A. Existing and Projected Conditions Report. B. Technical appendices with detailed data analyses. C. Maps and GIS files developed or utilized. IV. Task 4 entails the development of an additional transit component within the LRTP. The work detailed in Task 4 will not commence until agreements have been executed between the MPO and City of Bozeman with the Urban Transportation District detailing the financing, accounting and project management related to Task 4. Absent such agreements neither the MPO nor the City of Bozeman shall be obligated to authorize or remit payment for any work performed under Task 4. All work and associated expenses must be tracked independently. Task 4 — Additional Transit Focus 1. Access the future transit ridership propensity of various populations (seniors, individuals with disabilities, people living with lower incomes, etc.) 2. Identify long range transit infrastructure needs A. Obtaining right of way, adding bus pull outs, etc. B. Bus stop amenities (including concrete pads, sidewalks, curb cuts, etc.) 3. Identify candidate corridors for high frequency transit (7-8 to later be narrowed down) 4. Evaluate potential transit locations/land needs 13 A. Additional transit facility (with maintenance, automated wash bay, etc.) B. Future transit transfer stations C. Park & Ride lots 5. Evaluate transit prioritization to improve service and reduce delays (could include emergency vehicles) A. Signal priority/Queue Jumps B. Accessory/dedicated transit lanes C. Shared transit turn lanes 6. Land use best practices (ex. Transit Oriented Design) A. Transit ties to affordability projects B. Engineering and design guidelines C. Developer requirements D. Environmental and climate projections 7. Identify opportunities for intentionality for increased use of transit A. Evaluate major employer data (housing, encourage use of transit) B. Coordination with regional transportation services (intercity routes) C. Coordination with Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority for potential future locations D. Passenger rail or light rail future locations E. Ridership and equity analysis F. Community engagement for participation from marginalized groups (minority groups, disability community, non-English speaking, etc.) G. Transportation mode shifts (transit, biking, walking, scooters, e-bikes, etc.) H. Identification of magnitude and potential locations of growth that could impact transit system operations. 8. Evaluation to meet transit goals and obtain funding A. Investigate local options for funding transit (consider Rural Improvement Districts, Business Improvement Districts, Special Improvement Districts, etc.) B. Flexible state funding, opportunity for state legislative buy in C. Estimating capital investments including “green” fleet or alternative fuel options. 9. Estimating capital investments including “green” fleet or alternative fuel options 10. Deliverables A. Additional Transit Analysis B. Technical appendices C. Clear separate accounting of expenses related to Task 4. V. Task 5 — Plan Development and Recommendations 14 1. Vision, Goals, and Objectives A. Develop the LRTP vision, goals, and objectives in collaboration with stakeholders and the public. 2. Transportation System A. Review and analyze future transportation demands based upon projections for population growth, employment trends, land use changes, and travel patterns. B. Ensure consideration and alignment with all planning factors (23 USC 134 (h), 23 CFR 450.306(b) and analysis elements (23 CFR 450.324). 3. Land Use and Zoning A. Research, examine, and document: i. Transit Supportive Land-Use: Identify optimal densities for residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments that correlate with walkability and high transit ridership. Include specific metrics (e.g., dwelling units per acre) and examples of success in the region. ii. Transit Oriented Development: Document national and regional best practices for TOD and policies that maximize access to transit. B. Ensure that all transportation modes are thoroughly considered and integrated with land use projections, emphasizing the critical nexus between land use and transportation planning. 4. Scenario Development and Modeling A. Assist in the development of an estimated three future scenarios to be modeled using a gravity model to help evaluate system performance, compare alternatives, and generate informed recommendations. i. Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) will manage and execute all transportation modeling for these scenarios. ii. The consultant team will help ensure accurate modeling. iii. Project team and TTAC will coordinate closely with MDT and selected consultant on the transportation modeling assumptions; once assumptions are established, consultant team will work directly with MDT to coordinate modeling data needs while keeping MPO staff apprised. iv. The consultant team will not be responsible for performing modeling. Consultants should not include modeling time in their proposals. B. Consultant team will review, analyze, and incorporate results appropriately. C. Assist in presenting modeling results to technical staff, elected officials, and community stakeholders. 5. Recommendations 15 A. Functional Classification Map i. Develop a regional MPO functional classification map. ii. Provide any updated GIS files. B. Policies, Programs, and Processes i. Consider the following when developing narrative recommendations: safety, security, connectivity, integration, economic vitality, efficient system management, enhanced travel and tourism, improved resiliency and reliability, transportation options, demand management, maintenance, snow removal, reduction or mitigation of stormwater impacts, emergency response, emerging technologies, multimodal needs, agency coordination, or other relevant considerations for motorized, nonmotorized users, people, and freight. 1. Discuss policies, programs, or strategies to protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements. 2. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes, for people and freight. ii. Any content in this section that pertains to proposed transportation investments—whether programs or projects— must align with federal regulations and planning factors. iii. Incorporate cross-asset management principles into recommendations. C. Performance Measures and Goals i. Incorporate Federally Mandated and State Performance Measures. 1. Address all federally mandated performance measures as outlined in 23 CFR Part 450.306(d) and applicable state performance targets. 2. Collaborate with MDT and relevant stakeholders to integrate these measures into the LRTP. 3. Ensure the performance measures support the national goals described in 23 U.S.C § 150(b) and adhere to the planning factors specified in 23 CFR Part 450. ii. Collaborate with stakeholders and the public to define local performance goals that reflect local priorities and needs, likely including mode share goals. 16 iii. Integrate local performance goals with state and federal measures into the LRTP framework to create cohesive plan, while ensuring clear definition between local goals and federal measures. iv. Develop interactive performance dashboards to effectively present measures, targets, and to support transparency, public engagement, decision-making, and ongoing monitoring. D. Financial Plan i. Utilize cross-asset management to guide the allocation of financial resources, ensuring funds are directed to projects that offer the greatest return on investment across all categories. ii. Identify and assess multimodal funding options to support project implementation and meet long-, mid- and short-term goals, including federal, state, local, traditional, non-traditional, and innovate funding opportunities. iii. Provide planning-level cost estimates for identified projects. iv. The consultant should analyze public input data collected throughout the planning process to help guide the develop of funding priorities. E. Project Lists When compiling the project lists, apply cross-asset management principles as part of performance-based planning and programming to prioritize projects and ensure limited resources are allocated to projects that enhance the overall transportation system. Consultants will ensure maintenance and life-cycle funding needs are discussed. i. Recommended and Committed Lists: Compile a list of projects reasonably expected to be funded on a long-term planning horizon, identifying funding sources, cost estimates, and priorities. ii. Illustrative Project List: Identify desired projects outside current funding capacity, providing rationale and potential funding strategies. F. Implementation Planning i. Develop clear strategies for implementing the plan, including potential roles and responsibilities of the MPO and its partners. 1. Build upon existing plans and explore opportunities to advance projects from these plans into actionable reality. 6. Deliverables A. Documented Vision, Goals, and Objectives. B. Transportation System Analysis. C. Scenario Development for Gravity Modeling. D. Regional Functional Classification Map and utilized GIS files. 17 E. Comprehensive Recommendations. F. Performance Measures and Goals. G. Financial Plan. H. Recommended and Committed Fiscally Constrained Project Lists, and Illustrative Projects List. I. Technical Memos and Supporting Documentation. J. GIS files and other resources developed or utilized. VI. Draft and Finalize LRTP 1. Collaborative Development: A. Perform work in a collaborative manner with all public and stakeholder partners, including MDT, FHWA, UTD, and local jurisdictions. B. Work closely with GVMPO staff throughout the plan development process, conducting incremental reviews to ensure alignment and promptly address feedback. 2. Develop High Quality, User-Friendly Document A. Produce a high-quality, visually appealing, and easy-to-navigate comprehensive document with clear graphics and images that has professional layout and publishing without the use of story boards. B. Append technical memos and relevant supporting documents to provide detailed reference information. These appendices should supplement the main LRTP document to offer in-depth analysis and document assumptions. C. The final document will be presented to the MPO after TPCC approval. 3. Ensure Compliance with Accessibility and Style Standards A. Create documents that comply with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 Level A and AA ADA accessibility standards 4. Performance Dashboard A. Create an interactive data dashboard to effectively present performance measures, targets, and goals in a manner that will support ongoing monitoring and decision-making. The dashboard should be designed for periodic updates. B. Include a snapshot of current performance in LRTP for future reference. 5. Deliverables A. Draft LRTP, with incremental reviews. B. Final LRTP with appendices, collaboratively developed. 18 Memorandum REPORT TO:Gallatin Valley MPO - Transportation Policy Coordinating Committee FROM:Jeff Butts, MPO Manager SUBJECT:Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (GVMPO) Staff Update MEETING DATE:November 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Administration RECOMMENDATION:Discussion on the GVMPO staff update. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.3 Public Agencies Collaboration: Foster successful collaboration with other public agencies and build on these successes. BACKGROUND:Work activities and accomplishments from Gallatin Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (GVMPO) staff since the last meeting include the following: Updated URL: GVMPO.org and GVMPO.net now redirect to the MPO microsite. Continuous Count Stations (CCS): The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) plans to install CCS hardware by year-end, pending weather; installation may shift to the spring. Association Membership: Staff engaged with the Association of Metropolitan Planning Associations (AMPO) to explore membership benefits for small MPOs, with membership pending. ADA Outreach: Collaborating with Ability Montana and Streamline to develop and deliver a presentation tailored to the ADA community. Belgrade Chamber Engagement: Presented with Streamline at the Belgrade Chamber of Commerce's Transportation Day to highlight MPO programs and planned activities. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the committee. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Report compiled on: November 20, 2024 19