HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-26-24 - UPF Agenda and Packet MaterialsA. Call to Order - 6:00 PM
B. Disclosures
C. Changes to the Agenda
D. Approval of Minutes
D.1 Approve Minutes from August 22, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting (Canter)
E. Public Comments on Non-agenda Items Falling within the Purview and Jurisdiction of the Board
THE URBAN PARKS & FORESTRY BOARD OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
UPF AGENDA
Thursday, September 26, 2024
General information about the Urban Parks & Forestry Board can be found in our Laserfiche
repository.
If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to
comments@bozeman.net or by visiting the Public Comment Page prior to 12:00pm on the day of the
meeting. At the direction of the City Commission, anonymous public comments are not distributed to
the Board or staff.
Public comments will also be accepted in-person and through Video Conference during the appropriate
agenda items.
As always, the meeting will be streamed through the Commission's video page and available in the
City on cable channel 190.
For more information please contact Mitch Overton, moverton@bozeman.net
This meeting will be held both in-person and also using an online videoconferencing system. You
can join this meeting:
Via Video Conference:
Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit.
Click Join Now to enter the meeting.
Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream, channel 190, or attend in-
person
United States Toll
+1 346 248 7799
Access code: 934 5616 9186
Approve Minutes from August 22, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting.
This is the time to comment on any non-agenda matter falling within the scope of the Urban Parks
& Forestry Board. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public
comment relating to that item but you may only speak once per topic. Please note, the Board
cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the
1
F. FYI/Discussion
F.1 Select alternative date for November and December 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meetings(Canter)
F.2 Park Land Trust Community Grant Program (Jadin)
F.3 Cattail Creek Corridor Park and Anchor Route Master Plan - Engagement Plan
Discussion(Jadin)
G. Adjournment
Board shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful
of others. Please state your name, and state whether you are a resident of the city or a property
owner within the city in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three
minutes.
General public comments to the Board can be found on their Laserfiche repository page.
This board generally meets the fourth Thursday of the month from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm.
Citizen Advisory Board meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that
requires assistance, please contact our Acting ADA Coordinator, Max Ziegler, at 406.582.2439
2
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Katie Canter, Contracts and Sports Parks Coordinator
Jess Laughlin, Administrative Assistant I
Mitch Overton, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT:Approve Minutes from August 22, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting
MEETING DATE:September 26, 2024
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:Approve Minutes from August 22, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting.
STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of
an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces.
BACKGROUND:In accordance with Commission Resolution 5323 and the City of Bozeman's
Citizen Advisory Board Manual, all Boards must have minutes taken and
approved. Prepared minutes will be provided for approval by the board at
the next scheduled meeting. Staff will make any corrections identified to the
minutes before submitting them to the City Clerk's Office.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:As suggested by the UPF Board.
ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the UPF Board.
FISCAL EFFECTS:None
Attachments:
UPF Minutes August 22 2024.pdf
Report compiled on: August 30, 2024
3
Bozeman Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting Minutes, August 22, 2024
Page 1 of 3
THE URBAN PARKS AND FORESTRY BOARD MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA
MINUTES
August 22, 2024
A) 00:02:41 Call to Order - 6:00 PM Present: Donald Ulrich, Alice Stanley, Madisynn Weber, Teri Lumsden, Brandt Berube
Absent: None
Excused: Dan Fenn
B) 00:02:57 Disclosures
C) 00:03:29 Changes to the Agenda
Agenda items F1 and F2 will be swapped.
D) 00:04:00 Approval of Minutes
D.1 00:04:12 Approve Minutes from May 23, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting
UPF Minutes May 23 2004.pdf
00:04:17 Approve with amendment to remove Anna Wearn from the roll call.
00:05:14 Motion to approve Approve Minutes from May 23, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting
Teri Lumsden: Motion
Madisynn Weber: 2nd
00:05:52 Vote on the Motion to approve Approve Minutes from May 23, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry
Board Meeting The Motion carried 5 - 0.
Approve:
Donald Ulrich
4
Bozeman Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting Minutes, August 22, 2024
Page 2 of 3
Alice Stanley
Madisynn Weber
Teri Lumsden
Brandt Berube
Disapprove:
None
D.2 00:06:34 Approve Minutes from June 27, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting
Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting June 27 2024.pdf
00:06:41 Motion to approve Approve Minutes from June 27, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meeting
Brandt Berube: Motion
Alice Stanley: 2nd
00:06:56 Vote on the Motion to approve Approve Minutes from June 27, 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry
Board Meeting The Motion carried 5 - 0.
Approve:
Donald Ulrich
Alice Stanley
Madisynn Weber
Teri Lumsden
Brandt Berube
Disapprove:
None
E) 00:07:19 Public Comments on Non-agenda Items Falling within the Purview and
Jurisdiction of the Board
F) 00:07:52 FYI/Discussion
F.1 00:07:57 Work Session: Bozeman Street Tree Guide Update
Street Tree Guide - Version 3.5.pdf
F.1 00:42:13 Planning and Development Update on Parks, Recreation and Active
Transportation Plan Implementation
PRAT Implementation Presentation
G) 01:36:25 Adjournment
5
Bozeman Urban Parks and Forestry Board Meeting Minutes, August 22, 2024
Page 3 of 3
6
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Mitch Overton, Parks and Recreation Director
Katie Canter, Contracts and Sports Parks Coordinator
Jess Laughlin, Administrative Assistant II
SUBJECT:Select alternative date for November and December 2024 Urban Parks and
Forestry Board Meetings
MEETING DATE:September 26, 2024
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission
RECOMMENDATION:Select alternative date for November and December 2024 Urban Parks and
Forestry Board Meetings.
STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of
an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces.
BACKGROUND:The November and December 2024 Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Meetings coincide with the Thanksgiving and Christmas Holidays. We would
like to propose moving the November Board Meeting to Thursday,
November 21st and the December Board Meeting to Thursday, December
19th.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None.
ALTERNATIVES:None.
FISCAL EFFECTS:None.
Report compiled on: September 18, 2024
7
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Addi Jadin, Park Planning and Development Manager
SUBJECT:Park Land Trust Community Grant Program
MEETING DATE:September 26, 2024
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:Park Land Trust Community Grant Program
STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of
an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces.
BACKGROUND:The Park Land Trust is funded primarily through Cash-in-lieu of Parkland
payments made in association with subdivision and site plan development
applications as allowed in Montana State Law and further defined in the
Unified Development Code and the CILP Resolution. CILP funds have been
used for a handful of community grants over 20 years including partnerships
with homeowners' associations for small neighborhood park improvements,
land acquisition with Gallatin Valley Land Trust, and investment in snow-
making with Bridger Ski Foundation. Applications have been received on a
rolling basis with limited public outreach.
In addition, the Park Improvement Grant funded through the General Fund
has been used with longtime community partners providing matching funds.
The intent is to relaunch the program with more structure around
application periods, grant periods and conditions, and to align it with the
2023 Parks, Recreation and Active Transportation Plan (PRAT Plan) in terms
of its goals and its strategic action to center park equity through Parks and
Recreation Department procedures.
See attached resources for discussion inspiration and the following websites:
FWP's LWCF Program
FWP RTP
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:NA.
ALTERNATIVES:NA
FISCAL EFFECTS:$220K in FY25 budget for Community Grant Program
8
Attachments:
fy_2022_oep_application_and_criteria_fillable.pdf
People, Parks, and Power_Theory of Change.pdf
Existing_CIL of Parkland APPLICATION.docx
Existing_PROCESS TO APPLY FOR USE OF CASH IN LIEU.docx
TOP_ROUGH_CUT_MATRIX.docx
TOP_Matrices.docx
Report compiled on: September 20, 2024
9
Page 1 of 6
Gallatin County Open Space
Levy Funding Application
“Other Eligible Projects” Category
The Gallatin County Commission shall issue a call for applications, typically once a year, opening
up the application cycle for interested parties to apply for funding from the Gallatin County Open
Space Levy funds under the “Other Eligible Project” category. Any party seeking funding from
this program must submit an application and supporting documentation as outlined herein.
I. Eligibility.
To be eligible for funding, projects must be located in Gallatin County and meet the following
minimum requirements:
1. Projects are limited to land acquisition, capital improvements, and maintenance projects that
support the purpose of the Gallatin County Open Space levy. Applicants must demonstrate
how a proposed project is related to the provision of recreation, protection of water quality of
streams and rivers, management of growth, or protection of wildlife areas. Conservation
easements are not eligible for funding under this category.
2. Projects must provide a tangible and compelling public benefit or provide public access,
preferably both. If not located on public land or land dedicated to public use, public access
must be in the form of a long-term easement or land use license granting public access.
3. Projects must score a minimum average score of 60 points to be eligible for funding. Note
that the County is not obligated to award funding to a project just because it scores greater
than 60 points.
4. Applicants are limited to public agencies, non-profit organizations, and property owners’
associations.
5. Projects must be in compliance with the applicable jurisdiction’s planning documents (e.g.
growth policy, neighborhood plan, zoning regulation, transportation plan, trails plan, etc.)
II. Award of Funding.
1. The Gallatin County Open Lands Board shall review and score projects in an advisory role for
the County Commission. The final decision on awarding Open Space Levy funds shall be
made by the County Commission in a public meeting.
2. It is anticipated that interest in this funding source will exceed the amount of funding
available. The maximum award for a project in a single application cycle is limited to
$100,000. Applicants may request funding in multiple application cycles to fund a project as
outlined in the application materials.
3. Upon award of funding, the Applicant shall enter into a grant award agreement with Gallatin
County specifying relevant details of the project and how funds will be paid. Please note that
10
Page 2 of 6
the Applicant will typically be required to submit an invoice to the County to be reimbursed
for eligible project expenses.
4. Gallatin County reserves the right to issue an award less than the amount of funding
requested. If the Applicant cannot complete a project with the amount of funding awarded, or
the Applicant fails to enter into a grant award agreement acceptable to Gallatin County in a
timely manner, Gallatin County reserves the right to reallocate the funding to another project.
5. Gallatin County reserves the right to not award all available funding in an application cycle.
III. Application Process
1. To be considered for funding, applications must be submitted by the deadline specified in the
call for applications and must include required supporting documentation.
2. Applications will be screened by the Open Lands Coordinator to ensure that minimum
eligibility requirements are met and that applications are reasonably complete. Complete
applications for eligible projects will be forwarded to the Open Lands Board for their review.
Incomplete applications or applications that aren’t eligible for funding may be rejected by the
Open Lands Coordinator.
3. The Open Lands Board will hold an informational meeting to familiarize its members with
the applications and projects. Applicants will be given an opportunity at this meeting to make
a brief presentation on the details of their project to the Open Lands Board.
4. Following the informational meeting and prior to scoring projects, Open Lands Board
members and staff may visit project sites. To avoid ex parte concerns, OLB member
communication with applicants for the purpose of site visits shall be limited to that necessary
to obtain access to the project site.
5. Open Lands Board members will submit their project scores to the Open Lands Coordinator
who shall tabulate scores. Scores will be reported as the average score, calculated according
to the total number of Open Lands Board members who submit scores.
6. The Open Lands Board will hold one or more meetings to review project scores and make
recommendations to the County Commission on the award of funding.
7. The County Commission shall consider the Open Lands Board’s recommendations in a public
meeting and make decisions on funding projects.
8. Successful applicants will be required to enter into a grant awards agreement with the County
before they can be reimbursed for eligible project expenses.
11
Page 3 of 6
IV. Evaluation Criteria
Applications are reviewed and scored relative to other applications in the same funding cycle.
This means that there may be varying levels of support for similar projects during different
application cycles. Out of 100 possible points on the project scoring matrix, projects must
receive a minimum final project score of 60 points to be eligible for funding. Final project score
shall be the mean score of all scores submitted by Open Lands Board members participating in
the scoring of the project.
Applications will be reviewed against the following criteria:
1. The extent to which the proposed project supports the overall purpose and intent of the
Gallatin County Open Space Levy.
Explanation: The purpose and intent of the Gallatin County Open Space Levy is to
support the provision of recreation, water quality of streams and rivers, management of
growth, or protection of wildlife areas. Projects that do a better job explaining how they
support the overall purpose and intent of the Gallatin County Open Space Levy will be
scored higher by Open Lands Board members than projects that don’t support the purpose
and intent as well.
2. The degree to which the proposed project results in a tangible and compelling public
benefit, either to publically accessible land or to a public resource (e.g. water quality,
wildlife, etc.).
Explanation: Projects funded by the Open Space Levy are expected to provide a
meaningful public benefit, either to publically accessible land, or to a public resource.
Projects that are perceived as resulting in the greatest public good will be viewed more
favorably. Applications will be scored based on how well they can describe and
communicate the projects public benefit relative to other applications in the same
application cycle.
3. Degree to which the investment of public dollars in the proposed project will provide a
lasting impact.
Explanation: Open Space Levy funding is a limited resource, and Gallatin County wishes
to see these dollars used in a manner that will provide a lasting benefit for County
residents. Applicants are expected to describe the anticipated lifespan of a project and the
lasting legacy that will be created through investment of public funding. As such, projects
related to real estate acquisition or improvements thereon will generally score higher than
requests to fund equipment. Use of equipment funded through this program must be
narrowly restricted to purposes that support the program.
4. Degree to which the proposed project supports community objectives as established in
documents adopted by the community (i.e. the extent to which the proposed project
complies with the community’s adopted growth policy, neighborhood plan, zoning
regulation, transportation plan, trails plan, etc.).
Explanation: Communities establish goals, policies, and regulatory requirements through
adoption of a variety of documents (e.g. growth policies, neighborhood plans, zoning
12
Page 4 of 6
regulations, transportation plans, parks and trails plans, capital improvement plans, etc.)
Projects that can articulate how they support and comply with these community objectives
will be scored higher by Open Lands Board members that projects that cannot.
5. Degree to which the investment of Open Space Levy funding is leveraged with funding
from other sources.
Explanation: Leveraging funds from this program with other sources of both public and
private funds is important. Projects are scored based on the percentage of funding for the
total cost of the project that comes from other funding sources.
Scoring Matrix
Points
Possible
Points
Awarded
1 Degree to which the proposed project supports the overall purpose
and intent of the Gallatin County Open Space Levy.
2
Degree to which the proposed project results in a tangible and
compelling public benefit, either to publically accessible land or to
a public resource (e.g. water quality, wildlife, etc.).
3 Degree to which the investment of public dollars in the proposed
project will provide a lasting impact.
4
Degree to which the proposed project supports established
community objectives as statements in documents adopted by the
community (i.e. the extent to which the proposed project complies
with the community’s adopted growth policy, neighborhood plan,
zoning regulation, transportation plan, trails plan, etc.).
5
Degree to which the investment of Open Space Levy funding is
leveraged with funding from other sources.
Points awarded based on the percentage of the total project cost
coming from other funding sources.
If 25% or less of the project cost funded by other sources,
score = 0.25 x points possible
If between 25.01% and 50.00% of the project cost funded by
other sources, score = 0.5 x points possible
If between 50.01% and 75.00% of the project cost funded by
other sources, score = 0.75 x points possible
If greater than 75.01% of the project cost funded by other
sources, score = 1.0 x points possible
Instructions for Open Lands Board Members: Before scoring applications each Open Lands
Board member will assign 10 – 30 points to each of the five criteria, such that there is a total
possible score of 100 points. The Board member may not adjust the points possible between
categories during an application cycle.
13
Page 5 of 6
Application for Gallatin County Open Space Levy Funding
“Other Eligible Projects” Category
1. Project Name:
2. Please give a brief description of your project:
3. Budget Information:
Amount of Funding Requested:
Total Project Cost:
Amount requested as percentage of total project cost:
Funding sought/secured from other sources:
Do you anticipate requesting future funds to complete project:
4. Applicant Contact Information:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Mailing Address:
14
Page 6 of 6
5. Property Owner Contact Information:
Name:
Phone:
Email:
Mailing Address:
If multiple property owners attach contact information on separate sheet.
On Separate Sheet(s) Provide the Following:
6. Narrative addressing evaluation criteria (see pages 3 and 4 of application packet for additional
information).
7. Describe proposed timeline for project and any work already completed on the project.
8. Describe anticipated maintenance requirements for the project along with an explanation of
who will be responsible for maintenance and maintenance costs.
9. Please attach any supporting documents, maps, pictures, letters of support, etc. that may be
useful in the initial evaluation of your proposal.
10. Provide 15 copies of your completed application and supporting documentation and one digital
copy.
I hereby certify that the information on and attached to this application is true and correct, and
by signing below I authorize County Staff and Open Lands Board Members to access the
project site as necessary to evaluate this application.
Applicant’s Signature Date
Property Owner’s Signature (If different than Applicant) Date
15
THEORY OF CHANGE:
People, Parks and Power National Funding Initiative
Through the People, Parks, and Power (P3) initiative, we will accelerate a new movement for park and green space equity led by the
communities that, for generations, have suffered the health, social, and environmental impacts of park, green space, and other built
environment inequities. By using strategies drawn from public health successes and the legacy of power building movements led by people
of color, we can transform the field at this unprecedented moment in time and eliminate longstanding park and green space inequities.
The Problem The Strategy Indicators of Progress Long-Term Outcomes
The People, Parks, and Power initiative
• Racist public policies (e.g.,
segregation, redlining,
etc.)
• Exclusionary practices
within the traditional
conservation movement
• Park and green space
inequities contribute to
poor community health
outcomes
• African Americans,
Latinos and low-income
communities marginalized
in park and green space
work
• Limited public agency
leadership and capacity
to operationalize park and
green space equity*
• Flawed narratives
• Research gaps
• Build power and invest
in African American,
Latino, and low-income
communities
• Marginalized groups
advocate for local policy
change focused on park
and green space equity
• Enhance public agency &
conservation leadership
and capacity for parks
and green space equity
• Formalize inclusive
national network for park
and green space equity
• Bolster strategic
communications and
support narrative change
• Conduct timely and
authoritative research
• Groups led by African Americans, Latinos,
and other people of color organizing and
advocating for park and green space
equity
• Communities most impacted by park
and green space inequities lead efforts
to define the problem and implement
solutions
• Measurable progress towards strong,
effective public policy and institutional
practice change
• Increased capacity and leadership
among public agencies & conservation
organizations to operationalize equity in
their work and serve as effective allies
• Representative national network for park
and green space equity established
• New narratives that support park and
green space equity
• Improved and actionable data for park and
green space equity
• Increased power and capacity among
marginalized communities
• Local policy change victories, e.g.,
• Increased resources for parks in high
need urban communities
• Community engagement units
established within agencies
• Anti-displacement provisions included
in park equity policies
• Reduced park and green space inequities and
measurable steps toward health equity made
• Equity is effectively operationalized by public
agencies & conservation organizations
• New narratives widely adopted that
support park and green space equity
• Growing body of research and evidence to
advance park and green space equity
• Innovation and expansion of park and
green space equity action across the U.S.
Complementary efforts and initiatives
16
THEORY OF CHANGE:
People, Parks and Power National Funding Initiative
*PARK AND GREEN SPACE EQUITY FRAMEWORK
The framework presented here draws from an equity model advanced by
scholars and practitioners.1,2 It has been adapted for the park and green
space (hereafter “green space”) equity realm with examples that provide
practitioners, advocates, funders, and other stakeholders actionable
guidance to advance green space equity.3,4
Procedural equity involves decision-making processes—related to all
aspects of green space, from placement to design, construction, and
programming—that are transparent, equitable, and inclusive with regard
to who participates, how they are engaged, and how input is valued
and applied. It also covers processes inherent in the equitable and just
provision of green spaces services. Procedural equity can be assessed
in relation to core functions that include but are not limited to:
• Decision-making about all aspects of green space functions
• Community engagement to secure input at each stage of green
space development
• Condition and quality of green space infrastructure, amenities,
and features
• Staffing and services related to operations, maintenance, and
programming
Distributional equity means fair distribution of resources, benefits,
and burdens, and prioritizes resources for communities experiencing
the greatest inequities. Distributional equity is often the first thing
people think about when they think about equity because it is the
most quantifiable. It covers:
• Distribution and accessibility of green spaces in communities
• Distribution of facilities, amenities, and features placed within
a green space
• Fiscal allocation formulas for green space development or
improvements, including general funds, public finance measure
expenditure plans, competitive grantmaking processes, etc.
• Allocation of funding and staff to conduct inclusive and relevant
recreational programming and ensure maintenance of facilities
• Perceived and actual safety in and around green spaces
• Prioritizing strategic planning and innovation focused on achieving
green space equity
Structural equity addresses underlying structural factors and policies
that give rise to green space inequities in the first place. It makes a
commitment to correct past harms and prevent future unintended
consequences. While less quantifiable than the other dimensions of
equity, structural equity related to green space can include:
• Improving staff representation at all agency levels among people
of color and other marginalized groups
• Internalizing and operationalizing equity and racial justice across
agency staff and leadership, including local knowledge of historical
and present-day injustices and accountability metrics to redress
spatial and operational disparities
• Designing and programming park facilities and green spaces to
be sites of healing and resilience, and address a holistic range of
neighborhood needs, threats, assets, and opportunities
• Job training and workforce development programs for residents
of high need communities
• Developing protections to ensure that green space development does
not lead to displacement of long-term residents and businesses.
1 Yuen, T. et al. (2017). Guide to equitable, community driven climate preparedness planning. Urban Sustainability Directors Network.
https://www.adaptationclearinghouse.org/resources/guide-to-equitable-community-driven-climate-preparedness-planning.html
2 Sister, C., Wolch, J., & Wilson, J. (2010). Got green? Addressing environmental justice in park provision. GeoJournal. 75:229-248.
3 Sister, C., Wilson, J. & Wolch, J. (2008). The Green Visions Plan for 21st century Southern California. Access to parks and park facilities in the Green Visions Plan Region. University of Southern California,
GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, CA, 17.
4 Boone, C.G., Buckley, G.L., Grove, J.M. & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767-787.17
1 of 2
CASH-IN-LIEU of PARKLAND FUNDING APPLICATION
Please complete all sections of the application. Attach additional pages as necessary. Contact Addi
Jadin, Parks Planner and Development Manager, for assistance with supplemental requirements or any
questions (ajadin@bozeman.net or 582-2908).
Park Name(s): _______Westlake Park_____________________________________________________
Name of Project: ____2020 Westlake Park CILP Application________________________________________
Location of project within the park and nearest cross-streets: Improvements throughout park which is located at
the southeast corner of N. 5th Avenue and E. Tamarack Streets_________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Applicant (Organization): Gallatin Valley BMX and SouthWest Montana Mountain Bike Association
Primary Contact: Maggie Svaldi, President, GVBMX; Richard Hayes, SWMMBA
Phone: 406-209-3380 (Maggie); 970-333-9761 (Richard)
Email:maggiesvaldi@hotmail.com; richard@southwestmontanamba.org
Mailing Address: NA
Cash-in-lieu amount requested: $193,500
Match to be provided by applicant (if applicable): ___________________ cash __$86,030___in-kind
Please provide a brief description of the project. Describe existing conditions in the park, proposed improvements,
why they are needed, and a desired time frame for completion.
_see Application and staff memo ________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
(see submittal requirements on the next page)
18
2 of 2
Submittal Requirements – Attachments
1) Site layout drawing (site plan) with dimensions of proposed improvements at 1” = 20’ feet or
larger scale as well as existing features in the area of the park.
See Amended Master Plan Documentation provided by Parks Division.
2) Copy of the current park master plan with location of proposed features indicated (contact
the Parks Planner and Development Manager for existing master plan).
See Amended Master Plan Documentation provided by Parks Division.
3) Describe the process utilized for obtaining public input and support for the project (HOA
meetings, neighborhood survey, etc.)
Prior Master Plan Process utilized neighborhood meetings and surveys; amendment is the
result of user group meetings and neighborhood residents/volunteers
4) Details or manufacturer cut sheets of the proposed site improvements.
TBD. Site Plan and details to be assembled by design firm.
5) Basic cost estimate for purchased items and installation costs.
See detailed budget reports in application
6) If applicable, describe in detail how all in-kind contributions will be provided as applicable
(matching volunteer labor, donated items, etc.).
See detailed budget reports and narrative
7) Describe how the project relates to the goals and stated needs of the City’s Park,
Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Plan.
See staff memo.
8) Describe the development project source(s) of cash-in-lieu (contact the Parks Planner and
Development Manager prior to application).
See staff memo.
19
PROCESS TO APPLY FOR ALLOCATION OF CASH-IN-LIEU OF PARKLAND
DONATION FUNDS (REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL)
General Instructions/Information
Cash-in-lieu (“CIL”) of parkland funds are obtained during the development proposal
approval process as required by state law (MCA 76-3-621; see:
http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/76/3/76-3-621.htm). Funds may be used for improvements
that are included in a previously approved park master plan in any City-owned or City-
maintained park, or in association with a new or revised park master plan, with City
Commission approval. Improvements may include landscaping, irrigation, trails, benches,
play equipment, sports fields, accessibility upgrades, restrooms, picnic shelters, etc. The
proposal must demonstrate that the improvements will:
add to the long-term benefit of the park and surrounding properties;
reflect the interests of, and have the support of, adjacent property owners; and
comply with the existing park master plan, or if one does not exist or a new or revised park
master plan is being proposed, be consistent with the goals of the Parks, Recreation, Open
Space, and Trails (PROST) system-wide Master Plan and the current recreational needs of
the City of Bozeman.
There is no specific “match” requirement, but community support for the proposal is
encouraged. Support may be in the form of cash match, in-kind services (design and
engineering, construction, volunteer installations, landscaping, etc.), or material donations
(trees, plants, mulch, gravel fines for trails, or play equipment items or park furnishings
that meet department standards), or a combination of the above.
Application Process
Applications may be submitted at any time, however, the entire approval process may take
eight weeks or longer if a master plan revision is necessary. The application form may be
obtained online at: www.bozeman.net/government/parks. he “Cash-in-lieu Funding
Request ” information can be accessed from the left menu. All applications should include
the information requested on the form. Questions may be directed to the Manager of Trails,
Open Space and Parks (TOP) Design and Development: via email cpoissant@bozemman.net
or by phone 406-582-2908. Applications will be reviewed by the TOP Manager, the Parks
and Cemetery Superintendent, and the Director of Parks and Recreation to determine if the
project meets the above criteria. Staff will work with the applicant to prepare a
presentation for the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board in order to receive a
recommendation for Commission action, including a recommendation to adopt a revised or
new park master plan, where appropriate.
The application requires submitting a project narrative and a project layout illustration or
site plan showing where the proposed items would be located. Larger projects may require
Development Committee Review if the existing park master plan needs to be modified. DRC
review requires a set of plans to be prepared by a design professional (landscape architect,
architect, or engineer) including layout of all proposed features, details (or manufacturer
cut sheets) for proposed improvements, landscaping, and irrigation as well as a cost
estimate for the project. The TOP Manager will work with applicants to assist with the
20
preparation and submittal of the necessary plans, which may require use of some of the
requested cash-in-lieu funds to pay for design and engineering services.
Project Design and Implementation
All CIL park development projects will be managed by the Parks Department. All
applicable City standards, policies, and procedures must be followed. In any case for which
the applicant is authorized to manage work in the park, a License Agreement with the party
performing the work must be approved by the Parks Department and City Commission to
ensure proper insurance and liability coverages are provided.
Maintenance
All proposed improvements become the property of the City and shall be maintained in
good condition by the entity currently responsible for maintenance of the park in which
they are installed (i.e., by the HOA or by the City). The Parks Department reserves the right
to make adjustments to the improvements for safety and security considerations and as
needed to maintain public facilities according to department standards.
CASH-IN-LIEU FUNDING APPLICATION
Please complete all sections of the application. Attach additional pages as necessary.
Contact the TOP Manager if you need assistance (phone: 582-2908).
Park Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________
Name of Project: __________________________________________________________________________________
Location of project within the park and nearest cross-streets: ______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Applicant (Organizatioin):_______________________________________________________________________
Contact Person: __________________________________________________________________________________
Phone#: ___________________________ Email: _______________________________________________________
Mailing Address of Applicant: __________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Amount of Cash in Lieu funding requested:____________________
Amount of Match to be provided by applicant:_________________ cash ___________________in-kind
Please provide a brief description of the project. Describe existing conditions in the park,
proposed improvements, why they are needed, and a desired time frame for completion.
21
Additional Submittal Requirements – Attachments
Please provide the following:
Site layout drawing (site plan) with dimensions of proposed improvements at 1” = 20’ feet or
larger scale as well as existing features in the area of the park.
Details or manufacturer cut sheets ofthe proposed site improvements
Basic cost estimate for purchased items and installation costs. Describe in detail how all in-kind
contributions will be provided (volunteer work, donated items, etc.)
Copy of the current park master plan with location of proposed features indicated. Park master
plans may be obtained from the Community Development Office (406-582-2260). The plat for
any public park may be found by clicking on “Link to Plat” on the City’s GIS map:
http://gisweb.bozeman.net/Html5Viewer/?viewer=maps
Describe the process utilized for obtaining public input and support for the project (HOA
meetings, neighborhood survey, etc.).
Describe how the project relates to the goals and stated needs of the City’s Park, Recreation,
Open Space, and Trails Plan.
Describe all committed match funding, in-kind services, materials donations, and volunteer
labor for the proposed project (not required for making a request).
Describe the development project source(s) of cash-in-lieu (if known). Call the Community
Development office for the latest information (406-582-2260) or check the City website map
for current projects: http://gis.bozeman.net/flexviewers/planning/
Contact the Parks Design and Development Manager for more information:
cpoissant@bozeman.net phone: 406-582-2908
22
TOP ROUGH CUT MATRIX
Project: ________________________________Date __________________
Reviewer: _______________________________
Directions: Answer each question yes or no, marking an X in the appropriate box. To
proceed to the next level of review, the Committee must award the proposal an average score of at least 5
yeses, including a mandatory yes on question one of the Guiding Documents section.
GUIDING DOCUMENTS
Yes No
*Resolution 4386: Project proposal aligns with at least one ballot
language initiative (Parks, Natural Areas, Trails, Multi-Use Recreational
Fields/Facilities, and/or Water Quality)?
*mandatory “yes”
PROST Plan: Project is identified in PROST?
Community Plan: Project aligns with Bozeman Community Plan?
BALANCE
Yes No
Project balances types of parks, trails and open space available in and
around the City of Bozeman?
1
23
MAINTENANCE
Yes No
Are maintenance requirements or needs feasible?
OPPORTUNITY
Yes No
Proposal represents a prudent long-term investment for the City?
Proposal suggests a feasible partnership opportunity?
Proposal represents an opportunity to leverage bond funds?
Total Yes: __________
24
Reviewer__________________________________Date____________________________
Community Benefit MATRIX
Directions: This matrix assesses projects contribution to the parks, trails and open space system.
Rate the proposal from 0 to 5 on each criterion.
CONTRIBUTION TO THE PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM
Variety: Contributes to the variety of lands within the park, trail
and open space system.__________
Distribution: Distributes the park, trail and open space system
throughout and around the City of Bozeman planning area.__________
Enhancement: Integrates, and enhances existing and/or projected
development.__________
Balance:Contributes to a comprehensive park, trail and open
space system by adding to the balanced diversification and need
for different types of space.
__________
Leverage: Leverages and represents a good value for tax payer
dollars to enhance the system.__________
Connections: Makes connections within a type of park, trail or
open space, among different types of space, or between the system
and adjacent lands with different uses.
__________
Rating: __________%
25
Reviewer________________________________Date________________
Prevailing Characteristics Matrix: Parks
Directions: Rate the proposal from 0 to 5 on each criterion. Enter this number in the first
blank (rank) and multiply by the criteria’s weight to achieve the score.
Criterion
Rate
(weight x rank)
The area is identified in the PROST Plan as a location for a
community or neighborhood park or the location can serve a large
portion of a population in an area that has relatively low parkland
level of service as identified in the PROST Plan.
6 x ____ = ____
The project has potential for outdoor recreation due to its physical
attributes, including its size, shape, topography, location, and/or
flora and fauna. 5 x ____ = ____
The proposed park is easily accessible and visible to the public
(has adequate parking and is bordered by public streets and/or
significant bike/ped trails).
5 x ____ = ____
The proposed park land possesses features of aesthetic value
and/or significant historical value.
4 x ____ = ____
The proposed park land is offered at a fair price and has
significant value as a park.4 x ____ = ____
Rating: _______%
26
Reviewer________________________________________ Date___________________
Prevailing Characteristics Matrix: Natural Areas/ Open Space
Directions: Rate the proposal from 0 to 5 on each criterion. Enter this number in the first
blank (rank) and multiply by the criteria’s weight to achieve the score.
Criterion Rate
(weight x rank)
Primary Characteristics: Natural Values
The land includes a stream, watercourse, or wetland and is
priced at a value consistent with its prevailing characteristics (i.e.
wetlands and flood plains are not priced as development land)
5 x ____ = ____
The project area provides protection to natural resources and/or
agricultural interests.
5 x ____ = ____
The land provides long-term protection of critical wildlife
habitat.4 x ____ = ____
The project protects areas of cultural, historical or
archaeological significance.
4 x ____ = ____
The project area possesses a distinctive geological form
contributing to the character of the Gallatin Valley.4 x ____ = ____
27
Secondary Characteristics: Human Use Values
1
The land is visually attractive or unique.4 x ____ = ____
The project area is suitable for such non-intrusive, low-
intensity recreation such as walking/hiking or nature study. 4 x ____ = ____
The property presents opportunities for environmental
education.
3 x ____ = ____
The project property is accessible for appropriate public uses.3 x ____ = ____
Rating: _______%
2
28
Reviewer_____________________________Date________________
Prevailing Characteristics Matrix: Stream Enhancement/Water Quality
Directions: Rate the proposal from 0 to 5 on each criterion. Enter this number in the first
blank (rank) and multiply by the criteria’s weight to achieve the score.
Criterion Rate
(weight x rank)
The land includes a stream, watercourse, or wetland and is priced
at a value consistent with its innate characteristics (i.e. wetlands
and flood plains are not priced as development land)6 x ____ = ____
The project seeks to enhance the water quality for fish and
wildlife.
5 x ____ = ____
The project seeks to restore a stream or wetland to a higher
functioning condition. 5 x _____=_____
The project seeks to increase or improve recreational
opportunities in public waterways.
5 x ____ = ____
Rating: _______%
29
Reviewer_______________________Date_____________________
Prevailing Characteristics Matrix: Multi-Use Recreational Fields & Facilities
Directions: Rate the proposal from 0 to 5 on each criterion. Enter this number in the first
blank (rank) and multiply by the criteria’s weight to achieve the score.
Criterion Rate
(weight x rank)
The proposed property/design lends itself to hosting regional
athletic tournaments/events.6 x ____ = ____
New and existing infrastructure demands, including parking,
water, sewer, and storm drainage, have been considered and
found feasible.5 x ____ = ____
Access to the proposed area is possible via major thoroughfare.4 x ____ = ____
The project proposal adequately addresses short and long-term
maintenance of the facility.
4 x ____ = ____
The proposed project and use is appropriate in scale for the area
of Bozeman and mitigates impacts on surrounding land uses.
4 x ____ = ____
Rating: _______%
30
Reviewer_______________________________Date_____________________
Prevailing Characteristics Matrix: Trails
Directions: Rate the proposal from 0 to 5 on each criterion. Enter this number in the first
blank (rank) and multiply by the criteria’s weight to achieve the score.
Criterion Rate
(weight x rank)
The trail or connection is identified in the PROST or judged
beneficial.5 x ____ = ____
The trail would link important destinations or provide important
access (physical, visual, or proximal) to valued community
resources or destinations.5 x ____ = ____
The trail would become a recreational and/or transportation
complement to the Bozeman trail system.
4 x ____ = ____
The trail would provide the opportunity to more fully experience
the aesthetic, cultural, historical and natural resource values of an
area.3 x ____ = ____
A trail would be constructed and maintained with minimal
negative impacts to the human and natural environment. 3 x ____ = ____
Rating: _______%
31
32
Memorandum
REPORT TO:Urban Parks & Forestry Board
FROM:Addi Jadin, Park Planning and Development Manager
Mitch Overton, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT:Cattail Creek Corridor Park and Anchor Route Master Plan - Engagement Plan
Discussion
MEETING DATE:September 26, 2024
AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Policy Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:Cattail Creek Corridor Park and Anchor Route Master Plan - Engagement Plan
Discussion
STRATEGIC PLAN:6.5 Parks, Trails & Open Space: Support the maintenance and expansion of
an interconnected system of parks, trails and open spaces.
BACKGROUND:Staff will give an update about the overall project and get feedback on the
public engagement plan including overview of the engagement plan and
principles, reviewing stakeholder list, and developing engagement tools and
questions to be used at events and on the website.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES:NA.
ALTERNATIVES:NA
FISCAL EFFECTS:NA
Attachments:
09-20-24_Community-Engagement-Plan_Cattail_DRAFT.docx
Cattail-Creek-Stakeholder-Meeting-Materials.pdf
Cattail-Creek-Corridor_SOW.docx
Report compiled on: September 20, 2024
33
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN
PROJECT TITLE:CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR AND ANCHOR ROUTE PARK MASTER PLAN
PROJECT LEADS:
Addi Jadin, Park Planning and Development Manager
Ross Knapper, Park Planner
C.E. PURPOSE
Community engagement for this project is needed to raise awareness about the implementation of key aspects of the
PRAT Plan through a park master plan overlay for the 10 park systems that coincide with the Cattail Creek Corridor.
Designs created for the Cattail Creek park system will be used in other similar parkland corridors and will therefore
set a precedent for city-wide park improvements to be performed by the department, its partners and new
developments. The park master plan and associated design manual amendments will be reviewed by the Urban
Parks and Forestry Board and adopted by the City Commission. Public input is needed to provide insights on the
current and potential uses of the parks, Anchor Route design especially street crossing solutions, and to ensure the
Department is striking the right balance between natural resource enhancement and recreational or active
transportation access.
BACKGROUND:
The primary purpose of the master planning process is to plan the Anchor Route, as described in the Parks,
Recreation and Active Transportation Plan (PRAT Plan), that will run from E. Valley Center Road to the Gallatin
Valley Mall and Huffine. The Anchor Route shall fall primarily within parks but alternative locations may be
considered where more direct routes provide the best solution or where environmental impacts of the pathway are
deemed to be too significant. Alternatives like split pathways and variations on width and surfacing may be developed
as part of a phasing recommendation or as a response to site-specific constraints.Designs for the Anchor Route
should consider the different park contexts
The master plan will also include concept-level programming of the parks for active and passive recreation and
recommendations for natural resource improvements, water conservation, and increasing the tree canopy. Other key
themes (equity and balance) and recreation priorities (nature play, adult fitness, dog parks) identified in the PRAT
Plan should be incorporated into the designs along with additional input from the neighborhood gathered during the
community engagement period described below.The soon to be completed Active Transportation Wayfinding Plan
will inform signage locations within the system and should be included in the final design.
The recommendations/designs in the master plan should be coordinated with and/or will be the “blueprint” for
“Branch Out Bozeman” efforts such as development of a riparian planting guide, planting of native riparian
vegetation, replacing turf with drought tolerant and pollinator friendly species in the upland areas, and
constructing trails, benches, and intentional stream access points (low impact recreation).
As the first park master plan to be completed using the guidance of the PRAT Plan and the City’s first Parks
Design Manual,design typicals may be created for insertion into the Design Manual to describe pathway
specifics, riparian planting protocols, and solutions for establishing and emphasizing the delineation between
private lots and public land to avoid conflicts and ensure equitable access and enjoyment.
34
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
Definitions
Anchor Route
Shared Use Path
Riparian Area and Watercourse Setbacks
Open Space
KEY STAKEHOLDERS
Internal Stakeholders
City Commission (Decision maker)
Urban Parks and Forestry Board
Parks and Recreation Department
Transportation and Engineering
Transportation, Sustainability,
Community Development Boards
Sustainability Department
Stormwater
Water Conservation
INC (Interneighborhood Council)
City Manager/Community Engagement
External Stakeholders
HOAs and other people in subdivisions along the corridor:
o Cattail Lake (2 parcels)
o Cattail Creek (3 parcels; 1 open
space)
o Baxter Square (1 open space
parcel; 1 park)
o West Winds (11 park parcels; 4
open space)
o Harvest Creek (3 parcels)
o Greenway (2 parcels)
o Glenwood Meadows (1 parcel)
o Westgate (2 parcels)
o Fowler (1 parcel)
o Babcock Meadows (2 parcels)
Community organizations/non-profit
GVLT
Gallatin Watershed Council
Trout Unlimited
Sacajewea Audubon
Ability Montana
Montana Rebels Basketball
Big Sky Beach Volleyball
Haven
BSD7
Southwest Montana Mountain Bike
Association
Local Business
Gallatin Valley Mall
Bozeman Health
Community coalitions
Bozeman Tree Coalition
35
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
PUBLIC’S ROLE IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
Community Engagement is “decision oriented” meaning there is clarity around:
1.What decision needs to be made and what decisions have already been made
2.By whom the decision will be made
3.At what stages in the decision making process the public is being asked to participate
Engaging the public at higher levels and in earlier phases is important for decisions that have high or
long-term impact on the community, are highly polarizing, or especially complex. Move the circle to the
stage in the decision making process where the public will be involved. If the public will be involved in
multiple stages, copy and paste the circle.
STEP IN
DECISION
MAKING
PROCESS
SPECTRUM
LEVEL
C.E. STATEMENT
(leave empty if Spectrum Level is INFORM)
Combine the Spectrum level, language from
the from the Spectrum graphic below with the
decision making stage.
STAKEHOLDER
GROUP
(ex. all or targeted)
Define
problem /
opportunity
PRAT Plan defined the problem after
extensive public engagement
Gather
information
Establish
decision
criteria
INVOLVE PRAT Plan established goals and priorities for
park and trail development and maintenance
practices
City Wide
36
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
Develop
alternatives
DEVELOP
ALTERNATIVES
The public may inform design precedents
being developed that will be included in the
Park Design Manual for sustainable trail
building, public/private interface and phasing
ideas
City-wide
Evaluate
alternatives
EVALUATE
ALTERNATIVES
The public can be involved in evaluating the
alternative proposed routes and how funding
is prioritized to build out the pathway, habitat
improvements and recreational opportunities
and can give feedback from a list of priorities
generated during PRAT survey about what rec
programming opportunities should be
included
Neighborhood Focus
with input from
greater community
on some design
precedents being
created.
Make
decision
OVERALL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT LEVEL:
37
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
Move the circle over the level of community engagement for this project. It is likely that informing the
public will occur throughout the duration of the project in conjunction with the level of engagement.
GOAL FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
This statement has two parts. The first part states the goal of the overall project (ex: improve
transportation connections, plan for growth, develop a new program) and the second part makes the
connection to how the community will be engaged throughout the decision making process (ex: inform
and consult on establishing criteria and developing + evaluating alternatives).
Inform and Consult with the Broad Public
GOALS:
Provide the public with balanced and objective information to assist them in understanding the
problem,alternatives, opportunities, and/or solutions.
To obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives and/or decisions.
PROMISE:
We will keep you informed and listen to and acknowledge concerns & aspirations and provide
feedback on how public input influenced the decision.
38
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
We will work with you to ensure that your concerns & aspirations are directly reflected in the
alternatives developed and provide feedback on how public input influenced the decision.
Involve and Collaborate with Project Partners
GOALS:
To partner with the public in each aspect of the decision including the development of
alternatives and the identification of the preferred solution.
PROMISE:
We will look to you for advice & innovation in formulating solutions and incorporate your advice
and recommendations into the decisions to the maximum extent possible
OBJECTIVES –(SMART! Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timely)
Ex: Increase public awareness about.
Ex: Reach x number of individuals within the project boundary
Ex: Host x number of community outreach events over ____ timeframe
Ex: Identify two new stakeholder groups through existing contacts
Increase public awareness about PRAT Plan Goals, Strategies and Actions
Increase public awareness about development requirements for parks from subdivision to
subsequent development (cash-or improvements-in-lieu)
Reach 75 people within the park service area of ½-mile radius around the master plan area
Host 2-3 community outreach events over 2 months
Present at applicable City Board meetings
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
Timeline: July -September
Phase 1:STAKEHOLDERS
Stage 1 includes reaching out to specific stakeholders who will work with us on implementation
of the project including GVLT, GWC, and the West Winds HOA (consent to build required for
their open lands included in the study area). These groups will be involved, collaborate and may
be empowered to complete certain segments of the project with grant funding. They will help
come up with best proposals for how to achieve the project objectives (reduce turf, improve
habitat, increase trail connectivity, add in rec programming) and influence the designs.
Actions: Activities that will take place in coordination with internal and/or external stakeholders
o City met with stakeholders and landscape architect; City met directly with HOA to show
landscape architect’s direction and initial recommendations/scope of the project
Tools:Meetings, print materials, direct contact
39
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 6:31 PM
Timeline: Sept-October
Phase 2: BROAD PUBLIC AND CITY BOARDS PRESENTATIONS
Actions:
o Bike Your Park Day
o Launch Engage Website
o Open Houses/Workshops
Tools: partner emails, social media, signs/art banners in the park, engage website and followers,
Bike Your Park Day promotion of the website, presentations at meetings of City Boards
Timeline: November-December
Phase 3: PUBLIC MEETING/FORMAL ADOPTION
Actions:
o UPFB AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (IF APPLICABLE) RECOMMENDATION
TO CC
o City commission presentation/workshop followed by consent agenda item
o CITY COMMISSION FINAL Action and Adoption
Tools: Typical public notice and Engage messaging
40
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | AGENDA
AGENDA
1. Project Process + Schedule
2. Project Goals + Programming
3. Existing Conditions & Analysis
4. Initial Opportunities
5. Next Steps
41
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | SCHEDULE
PARK MASTER PLAN 5/1 - 10/1
Project Kickoff 5/1
Site Analysis / Design Ideation 5/1 - 6/14
Staff Workshop #1 - Intial Alternatives 6/24
Design Ideation 6/24 - 7/19
Staff Workshop #2 - Synthesis Meeting 7/19
Design Ideation 7/22 - 8/16
Staff Workshop #3 - Final Plan Review 8/16
Design Intent Illustrations 8/16 - 9/09
Public Event Materials Prep & Review 9/09 - 9/20
Materials Print & Publicity 9/20 - 9/27
Bike Your Park Day Event 9/28
Presentation to UPFB & CC 11/01
DESIGN MANUAL TYPICALS 10/1 - 11/01
Draft Development 10/01 - 10/11
City Review of Drafts 10/14 - 10/21
Revisions 10/22-10/31
Final Deliverable 11/01
Project Timeline APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER
5/1
6/24
7/19
8/16
9/28
11/01 (TBD)
11/01 OUTCOME 2
OUTCOME 1
OUTCOME 3
OUTCOME 4
42
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PROJECT GOALS
PROJECT GOALS
MOBILITY
1. Design routing for Anchor Route
Shared Use Pathway
1. Enhance riparian habitat
along corridor
2. Reduce water use in
corridor in line City goals
1. Identify and Locate
opportunities for increased
recreation in the park system
consistent with PRATECOLOGYRECREATION
43
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PROJECT GOALS
PROJECT OPPORTUNITY
UNIFY AS A SINGLE PARK
44
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PROGRAMMING
These pathways connect larger community nodes. They are heavily used
with full access and are typically constructed along major transportation
corridors but can also be located outside of rights-of-way. These routes are
designed to permit two-way traffic using an impervious surface material
such as asphalt or concrete. Certain settings may not be conducive to
impervious surfaces.
Width and Clearance
The preferred tread minimum width is 12 feet wide but can be decreased to 10
feet in interior subdivision settings.
All paths should have a 1-foot gravel shoulder and 2-foot minimum total
shoulder graded away from tread at a 2% maximum slope.
A minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet should be provided. Branches that
could reduce clearance when weighted with snow or rain should also be
removed.
Grade
The maximum tread cross slope shall be 2%, sloping one direction, not
crowned. The cross slopes on corners and curves shall be towards the inside
where drainage permits.
The maximum tread cross slope should be 5%, the cross slopes on corners
and curves shall be towards the inside where drainage permits. If there is
a segment that has a cross slope of more than 5%, the segment should be as
short as possible.
Maximum grade segments:
• 8.3% for a maximum of 15.24m (50ft)
• 10% for a maximum of 9.14m (30ft)
• 12.5% for a maximum of 3.05m (10ft)
Near the top and bottom of the maximum grade segments, the grade should
transition to less than 5%. Rest intervals should be provided within 7.6m
(25ft) of the max grade segment.
There can be no abrupt change in surface level greater than ½ inch.
Anchor Routes &
Shared Use Paths
Typical Assets and Design
Considerations
Cross Section
Concrete - The tread base shall consist of a minimum
of 3 inches of crushed gravel compacted to 95 percent
of maximum density as determined by AASHTO T99.
Concrete shall be a minimum of 6 inches of M4000.
Asphalt -Excavate 11.5 inches of material. Install a
minimum of 9 inches of crushed gravel compacted
to 95 percent of maximum density as determined by
AASHTO T99, unless otherwise dictated by sub-soil
type materials being compacted to road standard.
The overlay shall consist of 2.5 inches of asphalt
compacted to 93 percent of maximum density, as
determined by ASTMD 2041. Construction seal
shall be applied at 0.08 gallon/square yard after
installation.
Material
To decrease long term maintenance, tread surface
must predominately be impervious material such
as asphalt, concrete, pavers set on concrete, or wood
decking.
Porous surfaces (permeable pavers, porous asphalt,
porous rubber) should be a priority in sensitive areas.
The tread material including any base course will
have a total minimum thickness of 6 inches.
Wood deck planks must be run perpendicular to
the direction of travel and joints must not exceed 36
inches. Planks must be securely fastened so they do
not warp.
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
5’
LANDSCAPE
AREA
5’
LANDSCAPE
AREA
5’
SIDEWALK
5’
SIDEWALK
2’2’
CURB &GUTTER CURB &GUTTER
BIKE BOULEVARD
12’
PATHWAY
Anchor Route
VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIES
WATER
4’-6’
TRAIL
Neighborhood Trail
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
6’-8’
TRAIL
Connector Path10’CLEAR
BUFFER
2’VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
BUFFER
2’
Shared Use Pathway
10’
PAVED TRAIL
VARIES
TRAIL BUFFER
2’2’10’
DRIVE LANE
12’CLEAR
BUFFERBUFFER CURB &GUTTER
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
5’
LANDSCAPE
AREA
5’
LANDSCAPE
AREA
5’
SIDEWALK
5’
SIDEWALK
2’2’
CURB &GUTTER CURB &GUTTER
BIKE BOULEVARD
12’
PATHWAY
Anchor Route
VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIES
WATER
4’-6’
TRAIL
Neighborhood Trail
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
6’-8’
TRAIL
Connector Path
10’
CLEAR
BUFFER
2’VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
BUFFER
2’
Shared Use Pathway
10’
PAVED TRAIL
VARIES
TRAIL BUFFER
2’2’10’
DRIVE LANE
12’
CLEAR
BUFFERBUFFER CURB &GUTTER
PROJECT PROGRAMMING
These pathways connect larger community nodes. They are heavily used
with full access and are typically constructed along major transportation
corridors but can also be located outside of rights-of-way. These routes are
designed to permit two-way traffic using an impervious surface material
such as asphalt or concrete. Certain settings may not be conducive to
impervious surfaces.
Width and Clearance
The preferred tread minimum width is 12 feet wide but can be decreased to 10
feet in interior subdivision settings.
All paths should have a 1-foot gravel shoulder and 2-foot minimum total
shoulder graded away from tread at a 2% maximum slope.
A minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet should be provided. Branches that
could reduce clearance when weighted with snow or rain should also be
removed.
Grade
The maximum tread cross slope shall be 2%, sloping one direction, not
crowned. The cross slopes on corners and curves shall be towards the inside
where drainage permits.
The maximum tread cross slope should be 5%, the cross slopes on corners
and curves shall be towards the inside where drainage permits. If there is
a segment that has a cross slope of more than 5%, the segment should be as
short as possible.
Maximum grade segments:
• 8.3% for a maximum of 15.24m (50ft)
• 10% for a maximum of 9.14m (30ft)
• 12.5% for a maximum of 3.05m (10ft)
Near the top and bottom of the maximum grade segments, the grade should
transition to less than 5%. Rest intervals should be provided within 7.6m
(25ft) of the max grade segment.
There can be no abrupt change in surface level greater than ½ inch.
Anchor Routes &
Shared Use Paths
Typical Assets and Design
Considerations
Cross Section
Concrete - The tread base shall consist of a minimum
of 3 inches of crushed gravel compacted to 95 percent
of maximum density as determined by AASHTO T99.
Concrete shall be a minimum of 6 inches of M4000.
Asphalt -Excavate 11.5 inches of material. Install a
minimum of 9 inches of crushed gravel compacted
to 95 percent of maximum density as determined by
AASHTO T99, unless otherwise dictated by sub-soil
type materials being compacted to road standard.
The overlay shall consist of 2.5 inches of asphalt
compacted to 93 percent of maximum density, as
determined by ASTMD 2041. Construction seal
shall be applied at 0.08 gallon/square yard after
installation.
Material
To decrease long term maintenance, tread surface
must predominately be impervious material such
as asphalt, concrete, pavers set on concrete, or wood
decking.
Porous surfaces (permeable pavers, porous asphalt,
porous rubber) should be a priority in sensitive areas.
The tread material including any base course will
have a total minimum thickness of 6 inches.
Wood deck planks must be run perpendicular to
the direction of travel and joints must not exceed 36
inches. Planks must be securely fastened so they do
not warp.
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
5’
LANDSCAPE
AREA
5’
LANDSCAPE
AREA
5’
SIDEWALK
5’
SIDEWALK
2’2’
CURB &GUTTER CURB &GUTTER
BIKE BOULEVARD
12’PATHWAY
Anchor Route
VARIESLANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIESLANDSCAPE AREAVARIESWATER
4’-6’
TRAIL
Neighborhood Trail
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
6’-8’
TRAIL
Connector Path
10’CLEAR
BUFFER
2’VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
BUFFER
2’
Shared Use Pathway
10’
PAVED TRAIL
VARIES
TRAIL BUFFER
2’2’10’
DRIVE LANE
12’
CLEAR
BUFFERBUFFER CURB &GUTTER
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
VARIES
SHARED ROAD
5’
LANDSCAPEAREA
5’
LANDSCAPEAREA
5’
SIDEWALK
5’
SIDEWALK
2’2’
CURB &GUTTER CURB &GUTTER
BIKE BOULEVARD
12’
PATHWAY
Anchor Route
VARIES
LANDSCAPE
AREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIES
WATER
4’-6’TRAIL
Neighborhood Trail
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA
VARIESLANDSCAPE AREA
6’-8’TRAIL
Connector Path
10’
CLEAR
BUFFER
2’VARIESLANDSCAPEAREA
VARIES
LANDSCAPEAREA
BUFFER
2’
Shared Use Pathway
10’PAVED TRAIL VARIESTRAIL BUFFER2’2’10’DRIVE LANE
12’CLEAR
BUFFERBUFFER CURB &GUTTER
36 37
Program Enrollment
Total enrollment into the Department’s programs
was 3,414 in 2019. Aquatics had the highest
enrollment with 1,092 participants, followed by
preschool at 783, and camps at 661. Figure 5 shows
all the programs and the percentage of each of the
whole. There are some programs that are offered by
other organizations who take their own registration
(Skyhawks) and this data is not included in any of
these analyses.
Aquatics accounted for a third (32%) of the 2018-2019
enrollments, and preschool and camps accounted for
approximately one-fifth of the programming each,
21% and 19% respectively.
Aquatics accounted for nearly half (48.8%) of the
program menu and 32% of all enrollments, which
is typical due to the smaller class size and the
advertisement of several course sections that can
be combined, if needed. For camps and preschool,
the percentage of participants is greater than the
percentage of courses offered.
Similar Providers
Bozeman residents enjoy a wide variety of recreation
programs offered by a host of different organizations
– some of these are nonprofit groups and others are
private businesses. Many of these are provided space
for their activities by the Department.
The Department permits space to several affiliate
groups that provide recreation programs to the
community. When discussing the permitting process
with staff regarding the local sports programs,
understanding of requirements were inconsistent.
Future policies should be clarified for consistent
communications between the Department and
affiliate groups and should consider requiring all
affiliate groups to:
◊ require all coaches to submit to a criminal
background check,
top 10 priorities for investment top 10 priorities for investment
Natural surface trails
On-road bike lanes or facilities
Pools, indoor
Pools, outdoor
Trails, paved
Nature centers
Community gardens
Water access for recreation
Spraygrounds/splash pad
Pavilions and picnic areas
Aquatics or Swimming
Arts and Culture
Winter Recreation
Fitness
Etiquette programs for parks and trail users
Outdoor adventure
History
Outdoor education
Seniors/Active Aging
Special Events
◊ compare the list of coaches to the state and
federal sex offender databases,
◊ charge a special field use fee for nonresident
participants
◊ track demographics and city-county
resident status, scholarships given out and
DEI training
Fitness programs are often a desire for young adults
in communities across the country. Due to the low
percentage of programs offered by the Department for
adults, fitness opportunities within the community
were reviewed. There are several private facilities
spread out in the community offering fitness
opportunities for Bozeman residents.
In addition to the camps offered by the Department,
there are dozens and dozens of summer camps
available for Bozeman Youth. There are opportunities
for children of all interests including art, dance
(ballet, hip hop, aerial hammock, and choreography),
hiking, camping, rock climbing, STEAM (outdoor
science and coding), sports, yoga, drumming, karate,
performing arts, horseback riding, farm camp, and
more.
Community Survey
During the winter of 2021, the City released a
community survey and received 300 responses.
This survey, which is statistically valid and has a
confidence level of 95%, highlighted community-wide
desires for programs, parks, and park improvements.
The survey, which was administered by mail,
contained a cover letter, survey document, and
instructions for the survey to be taken online. The
cover letter included instructions for taking the
survey over phone for any residents that preferred to
speak a different language in their response.recreation facilitiesprograms45
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | INITIAL PROGRAMMING
BASKETBALL
PICNICRECREATION
ECOLOGYMOBILITYBRIDGESPICKLE BALL
GROVECREEK RESTORATION WETLAND
CREEK ACCESS
FITNESS DOG PARK
PAVILIONS OVERLOOKBENCHESOPEN TURF
SHARED USE PATH PED PATH CROSSING
46
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PROGRAM
CORRIDOR SIZE
TOTAL LENGTH
WIDEST SEGMENT
NARROWEST SEGMENT
POP. WITHIN 1/4 MILE **
** APPROXIMATE BASED ON CENSUS DATA
3.29
700 ft
11,93720 ft
47
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PROGRAM
EXISTING PARKS / PARK TYPES
Neighborhood parks are the basic unit of the park system, and serve as
the recreational and social focus of the neighborhood. Focus is on informal
recreation for all age groups and geared towards those living within the
service area. Neighborhood parks should be centrally located within their
service area, with access uninterrupted by non-residential roads and other
physical barriers. The service area of a neighborhood park has a ¼- to ½-mile
radius.
Neighborhood
Parks
223 Acres | 34 Parks
Alder Creek
Centennial Park
Cooper Park
Creekwood Subdivision Park
Diamond Park
Enterprise Park
Flanders Creek Subdivision Park
Four Points Minor Subd. Park
Gran Cielo
Headlands Park
HRDC (West Babcock Park)
Icon Park
Jarrett Park
Legends At Bridger Creek Park
M Anderson Park
Matthew Matsen Park
Meadow Creek Park
NE Corner & N Laurel Pkwy
New Hyalite View Park
Sandan Park
South University Distict
Southside Park
The Lakes At Valley West Park
Traditions Subdivision Park
Valley Unit Park
Valley West Park
Walton Homestead Park
West Winds Park
Westbrook
Westfield Park
Relevant Parks
Typical Assets and Design Considerations
Program & Use
Facilities include playgrounds (including adult and
senior playground equipment); informal playfields
or natural areas; basketball, tennis and volleyball
courts; ice skating; trails; and picnic and sitting areas.
Accommodations for off-leash recreation should be
provided where feasible.
Environmental Benefits
Similar to the pocket parks and plazas typology, it is
imperative to design grading to direct stormwater
into planted areas and mitigate the need for regular
irrigation. In these active, neighborhood serving
parks, investments in low maintenance plantings and
shade trees will support community use on hot days
and reduce urban heat island effect from surrounding
areas.
Siting/Access
The site should be accessible from throughout
its service area by way of interconnecting trails,
sidewalks, or low-volume residential streets. Ease of
access and walking distance are critical factors in
locating a neighborhood park. A neighborhood park
should have a minimum of 50 percent frontage on a
public or approved private street. Neighborhood parks
are generally 3 to 10 acres in size. Leftover parcels of
land that are undesirable for development are also
generally undesirable for neighborhood parks and
should be avoided. It is more cost-effective to select
a site with inherent aesthetic qualities, rather than
trying to recreate them through extensive development.
Connections and relationships within the
neighborhood will help to provide accessible and
visually cohesive relationships to surrounding
community destinations. Connections within and to
the park from nearby bike lanes and greenways should
be prioritized, especially those that connect into
city anchor routes. Curb cuts at street crossings and
wayfinding to direct visitors to surrounding amenities,
especially downtown, will help orient visitors to
various destinations.
Centennial Park
Valley West Park
City Goal of 100% Frontage on Public Roads
Central location in
residential neighborhoods
Flexible multi-use natural areas
Connection to sidewalks, community trails and greenways
PlaceholderCommunity parks are larger in size and serve a broader purpose than
neighborhood parks. Their focus is on meeting the recreational needs
of the entire community. They allow for group activities and offer other
recreational opportunities not feasible – nor perhaps desirable – in a
neighborhood park.
Community
Parks
Story MillCommunity Park
BozemanPond
Glen LakeRotary Park
Kirk
Park
199 Acres | 8 Parks
Beall Park
Bogert Park
Bozeman Pond
Glen Lake Rotary Park
Kirk Park
Lindley Park
Story Mansion Park
Story Mill Community Park
Relevant Parks
Program & Use
Potential recreation facilities include playgrounds
(including adult and senior playground equipment);
basketball, tennis and volleyball courts; informal
ballfields for youth play; ice skating rinks (temporary);
swimming pools or swimming beaches; trails,
including cross-country ski trails; individual and
group picnic/sitting areas; general open area; unique
landscapes and features; nature study areas; and
ornamental or native plant gardens. Accommodations
for off-leash recreation should be provided where
feasible.
Environmental Benefits
Similar to the pocket parks and plazas typology, it is
imperative to design grading to direct stormwater
into planted areas and mitigate the need for regular
irrigation. These larger parks can also direct runoff
towards designed bioretention systems (e.g., swales
and rain gardens). Wherever possible, these parks
should increase planting areas that can capture
stormwater and support water conservation
measures citywide, through low irrigation, native
plantings.
Siting/Access
Optimally, the site should be between 20 and 50 acres
in size; however the actual size should be based
on the land area needed to accommodate desired
uses. The site should be serviced by arterial and
collector streets, as well as the community trail
system. Parking lots should be provided as necessary
to accommodate user access. The site’s natural
character should play a very significant role in site
selection, with emphasis on sites that preserve unique
landscapes within the community and/or provide
recreational opportunities not otherwise available.
Typical Assets and Design Considerations
Recreational Facilities
Connection to community trail system Native Planting Areas
Arterial / Connector Streets + Parking Access
PlaceholderLinear parks contain pathways that serve a number of important functions:
• They tie park components together to form a cohesive park, recreation,
and active transportation system;
• They allow for uninterrupted and safe pedestrian and bicycle movement
between parks and throughout the community
• They contain clear signage that visually connects park components and
trails to better wayfinding
• They provide an opportunity for resource-based outdoor recreation.
Linear Parks
Gallagator
Linear Park
Harvest
Creek Park
62 Acres | 24 Parks
Babcock Meadows
Brookside Park
Diamond Estates Public Park
Gallagator Linear Park
Greenway/Westgate
Harvest Creek
Langohr Gardens Park
North 9th
Northern Pacific Addition To
Bozeman
Oak Meadows Subdivision Park
Sourdough Trail Park
Spring Meadows Park
Sundance Springs Park
The Knolls At Hillcrest Park
The Knolls At Hillcrest Park
Valley Creek Park
Village Downtown Park
West Meadows Park
Westridge East Park
Westridge North Park
Westridge South Park
Relevant Parks
Typical Assets and Design Considerations
Program & Use
Linear parks can be developed for a variety of different
recreational activities. Most notable are hiking,
walking, jogging, bicycling and cross-country skiing.
Environmental Benefits
The environmental benefits of linear parks include
reduced emissions from vehicular transportation
and an opportunity to create longer stretches of
contiguous native vegetation, habitat and wildlife
corridors. Special care should be taken to avoid the
spread of weeds within linear parks.
Since these habitat corridors will also naturally
support non- native species expansion, it is important
to create barriers for the spread of those species.
Many linear parks exist along water courses, which
presents an opportunity to improve riparian edges.
Plantings and naturalized landscapes along the
water’s edge could support increased fish and other
amphibious species habitat. Education signage
regarding “rewilding” of these riparian edges should
also be considered to raise awareness of these
investments.
Siting/Access
Land availability and opportunity are the primary
factors determining location. Many linear parks
will follow natural features such as watercourses,
while others will follow man-made features such as
abandoned railways. Linear parks should be at least
25 feet wide for general trail use, with additional
width required for parks used for cross-country
skiing. In addition to this minimum width, which
linear parks can extend beyond, linear parks should
also have requirements to provide specific amenities.
Linear parks should be designed to increase
connectivity for wildlife and eliminate barriers to
their movement.
Parcels with steep slopes and natural vegetationProtection of natural wetland and ponds
Connection to further trail systems
PlaceholderNatural resource areas are lands set aside for the preservation of natural
resources, remnant landscapes, and visual aesthetics or buffering.
Oftentimes, these areas are contained within existing parks, and require a
different management approach from more isolated natural areas.
For example, Mcleod Park is a neighborhood park with natural areas that
have to be well designed and integrated into the park to work alongside
existing recreational uses. There are similar examples in West Winds Park
and Bronken Park. These lands typically consist of:
• Individual sites exhibiting natural resources;
• Lands that are unsuitable for development but offer natural resource
potential. Examples include parcels with steep slopes and natural
vegetation, drainage ways and ravines; and
• Protected lands, such as wetlands, riparian areas and ponds.
Natural Area Parks
and Natural Areas within Parks
184 Acres | 27 Parks/Areas
Alder Creek Natural Space
Allison Park
Bridger Creek Park
Bronken Park - Natural Space
Burke Park
Cattail Lake Subdivision Public
Park
Flanders Creek Subdivision Park
Natural Space
Grafs East Park
Hauser Park
Ice House Park
Josephine Park
Laurel Glen Park
Loyal Gardens Subdivision Park
Mcleod Park
Meadow Creek Subd Public Park
Norton East Ranch Sub Park
Natural Space
Oak Springs Park Access
Corridor
Peets Hill
Shady Lane Public Park
Traditions Subdivision Park
Natural Space
Tuckerman Park
Valley West Park Natural Space
West Winds Park Natural Space
Willow Park
Natural Areas within Parks
Typical Assets and Design Considerations
Program & Use
Although natural areas are resource rather than user
based, they can provide some recreation opportunities
such as trails, and nature viewing and study. They
can also function as greenways. Development should
be kept to a level that preserves the integrity of the
resource.
Environmental Benefits
Natural Area Parks should be protected, restored,
maintained, and considered for expansion. To do
this, clear communication and barriers to prevent
dumping, walking, or vehicle access to the site should
be incorporated into the design of these spaces.
Minimize development of hard surfaces, including
bike trails and boardwalks, and strategically place
them to avoid dissecting, diminishing, or disturbing
natural areas within parks.
Use the existing types of vegetation community
present in natural areas, whether forest, shrubland,
meadow, stream, or wetland to guide the restoration
design for adjacent sites and for site expansion within
existing parks.
These places should include educational information
(e.g. signage) that will help visitors understand
natural system functions and increase aware of
ecosystem benefits. Bozeman’s Community Plan 2020
names birds as compatible with development and
encourages habitat protection
Siting/Access
Resource availability and opportunity are the
primary factors determining location and size.
Typically, when siting a natural area, underutilized
areas of parks and areas with vegetation or animal
species of concern are ideal places for natural area
investment.
Access points should be limited and well-signed, and
should connect into existing trail networks.
Access to greenways, trails and nature viewing opportunities
Protection of natural
resource areas
Baxter Meadows Natural Space
Baxter Square Natural Space
Cattail Creek Natural Space
Ferguson Meadows Natural
Space
Natural Area Parks
Playgrounds
Informal Playfields
Natural Areas
Basketball
Tennis Courts
Volleyball Courts
Playgrounds
Informal Playfields
Natural Areas
Swimming Pools / Areas
Basketball
Tennis Courts
Volleyball Courts
Trails
Walking
Jogging
Bicycling
Cross-Country Skiing
** Consider Rewilding of Creeks
Trails
Nature Viewing / Study
Greenways
** Prioritize integrity of the resource
CATTAIL LAKE
SUBDIVISION
PUBLIC PARK CATTAIL CREEK
NATURAL AREA
BAXTER SQUARE
NATURAL AREA
BAXTER SQUARE
PARK
CATTAIL
CREEK
PARK
BOZEMAN
POND
WEST
WINDS
PARK
HARVEST
CREEK
BABCOCK
MEADOWS
GREENWAY
FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
Picnic
Sitting Areas
Off-leash dog areas (where feasible)
Group Picnic
Group Sitting Areas
Unique Landscapes / Features
Off-leash dog areas (where feasible)
48
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 1A
CATAMOUNT STREET
NEED FOR NEW PATH
MIDBLOCK CROSSING?
MAINTENANCE PRACTICES
DIVERSIFY MATRIX FOR HABITAT
BRIDGE IDENTITY
MAINTENANCE PRACTICES
CATTAIL POND
SUNDEW LANE
WARBLER WAYFEN WAYBLACKBIRD STREETDAVIS LANEBENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
SPORTS COURT
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) HABITAT FEATURE
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
49
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
CATRON STREET
SANDAN
PARK
CATTAIL
ST
R
E
ETFEN WAYBLACKBIRD STREETDAVIS LANEWARBLER WAYBENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) RIPARIAN HABITAT
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 1B
MATURE REMANENT
OVERLOOK OPPORTUNITY
MAINTENANCE PRACTICES
AMPLIFY WAYFINDING
CONNECTIVITY TO ADJACENT PARKS
50
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
PROPOSED KIMBERWICKE STREET
BAXTER LANE
PROPOSED RAWHIDE RIDGE
GEORGIA MARIE LANE
EQUESTRIAN LANEBLACKBIRD STREETPROPOSED HUNTERS WAYTHOMAS DRIVEHOOVER WAYRENEE WAYBAXTER
SQUARE
SCHOOL
DISTRICT
PARCELS
BENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) RIPARIAN HABITAT
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 2
NATURAL EXPERIENCE POTENTIAL
CONSTRAINED PATH LOCATION
PROGRAMMABLE PARK
REMANENT HABITAT
PATH ROUTING NEED
PREFERRED CONNECTION POINT
51
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
BAXTER LANE
TRADE WIND LANE
TURBULENCE LANE
OAK STREET
BREEZE LANE
TSCHACHE LANE HUNTERS WAYBUCKRAKE AVEBENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) RIPARIAN HABITAT
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 3A
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
PROPOSED RAPTOR TRAIL
PROPOSED RAPTOR TRAIL
OPPORTUNITY TO DENSIFY PROGRAM
OPPORTUNITY TO REVEG
OFFSET CONNECTION TO TRAILS
PATH ROUTING NEED
CONSTRAINED PATH
EXISTING CROSSING
52
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
OAK STREET
ANNIE STREET
ROSE STREET
DURSTON ROADBUCKRAKE AVEHUNTERS WAY25TH AVEMONKEY
PARK
EMILY
DICKINSON
SCHOOL
BENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) RIPARIAN HABITAT
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 3B
PED PATH TO LOCAL SCHOOL
CONSTRAINED PATH
DRY CREEK BED - NO HABITAT STRUCTURE
OFFSET CROSSING
POTENTIAL BIKE BOULEVARD?
CONNECT TO OPEN SPACE
53
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
DURSTON RD
VILLARD STREET
MENDENHALL STREET
BABCOCK STREETHUNTERS WAYMICHAEL GROVE AVEHUNTERS WAYNORTH
MEADOWS
PARK
WILLOW
PARK
BENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) RIPARIAN HABITAT
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 4A
NODE / PLACEMAKING OPPORTUNITY
NODE / PLACEMAKING OPPORTUNITY
OPPORTUNITY TO VEGETATE TO MITIGATE PUBLIC / PRIVATE INTERFACE
POTENTIAL BIKE BOULEVARD?
NO PATH FEASIBLE
MEADOW QUALITY
NO PATH FEASIBLE
54
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
BABCOCK STREET
MAIN S
T
R
E
E
TVIRGINIA WAYDONNA AVEBOZEMAN
POND PARK
GALLATIN
VALLEY
MALL
BENCH
WATER ACCESS
DOG STATION
PLAYGROUND
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY
(E) WAYFINDING
VIEW
WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITY
BRIDGE
(E) CROSSWALK
(E) PATHWAY
XXXXX
CROSSWALK OPPORTUNITY
(E) RIPARIAN HABITAT
RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY
PROPERTY LINE
AREA EXTENT
PATH DESIRE
SIDEWALK
OBSERVATIONS - SECTION 4B
CONSTRAINED PATH
CONSTRAINED PATH
PLACEMAKING OPPORTUNITY / CONNECTION TO THE MALL
POTENTIAL BIKE BOULEVARD?
MATURE RIPARIAN SPECIES
55
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
FLEXIBLE LAWN
BRIDGES COURTS BENCHES
ORIENTATION NATURAL AREASSUMMARY OF EXISTING
PROGRAM
11 BRIDGES
2 BASKETBALL COURTS
13 BENCHES
56
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
SUMMARY OF EXISTING LAND COVER
WATER
TURF
RIPARIAN SHRUBS
20 acres
39 acres
72 acres
19 acres
GRASS LAND
57
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
SUMMARY OF HABITAT RESOURCES
MEDIUMLOW HIGH
WETWETWETDRY1 4
5
63
2 8
7
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
58
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | OBSERVATIONS
SUMMARY OF EXISTING PATHS
Baxter LnBaxter Ln
Valley Center LnValley Center Ln
I-
9
0
I-
9
0
Oak StOak St
Proposed AT Network
I-90I-907th Ave7th Ave19th Ave19th AveFowler AveFowler Ave3rd Ave3rd AveDurstonDurston
Huffine LnHuffine Ln
Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd
Fowler LnFowler LnCottonwood RdCottonwood RdKagy BlvdKagy Blvd
I-90I-90Rouse AveRouse Ave3rd Ave3rd AveSourdough RdSourdough RdMain StMain St
7th Ave7th Ave19th Ave19th AveMain StMain St
N1 mile00.5
Durston RdDurston Rd
W Tamarack StW Tamarack St
3rd Ave3rd AveGriffin DrGriffin Dr
7th Ave7th AveRouse AveRouse AveOak StOak St
I-90I-90
84 85
Proposed Anchor Routes
Proposed Shared Use Paths
Proposed Connector Paths
Proposed Neighborhood Trails
Proposed Bike Boulevards
Existing Trails
Existing Shared Use Paths
City Boundary
Growth Boundary
Roads
Railroad
Streams
Lakes & Reservoirs
Future Parks
Parks
7th-Front Street
Connector
Pathway Facilities
Figure 4.6 Proposed Active Transportation network with zoom in
of 7th-Front St Connector, highlighted in orange.
88
89
Baxter LnBaxter Ln
Oak StOak St
DurstonDurston
Huffine LnHuffine Ln
Valley Center LnValley Center Ln
I-
9
0
I-
9
0
19th Ave19th AveFowler AveFowler AveProposed Regional Loop Trail
Kagy BlvdKagy Blvd
Main StMain St
0 0.25 0.5
Downtown
Bozeman
◊Prioritize funding to build,
connect, and maintain Anchor
Routes.
The City should add prioritized shared use
path and connector path projects to the Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP). Likewise, an annual
portion of the City’s street construction budget
should be allocated to build shared use paths
and critical connector paths. In areas of key
park connectivity benefit and where severe
barriers exist, cash-in-lieu of parkland money
can be used to close gaps. Routes not likely
to be completed with adjacent development
should be prioritized.
◊Plan for robust maintenance of
Anchor Routes to ensure year-
round use and a high level of
accessibility.
A complete set of maintenance
recommendations are provided in the Design
Manual.
◊Design traffic calming measures
into the routes, particularly at key
destinations to reduce potential
conflicts.
As the network grows and connectivity
improves, developing design standards to
minimize conflicts at key destinations will
build a safer network. These include bollards,
striping, signage, and designating space for
different mode types.
1 mile N
This is a trackable metric
This is a trackable metric
Proposed 1-5 year loop
Proposed 1-5 year loop
Proposed 5-10 year regional loop
Proposed loop expansions
Parks
Open Space
City Boundary
Future expansion of the loop system will occur as new
communities and partners are engaged
EXPANDABLE
(6’-8’ EXISTING PATH THAT
CAN BE WIDENED)
CONSTRAINED
(2’-4’ PATH THAT CANNOT
BE WINDENED)
KEY INTERSECTING PATH
MISSING
(NO EXISTING PATH)
COMPLIANT
(10’-12’ EXISTING PATH)
59
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN TENETS
DESIGN TENETS
FLOW
REDUCE LAWN CONNECT & BUFFER HABITAT
NODAL VS. DISTRIBUTED LOGICAL CROSSINGS
60
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN
PROPERTY LINE
CREEK
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN PATH
PROPOSED SHARED USE PATH
WATER BODY
RE-VEGETATION AREA
NATIVE RESTORATION AREA
GRASSLAND AREA
LAWN/TURF AREA
PROPOSED SHARED USE ROAD
PICNIC TABLE
EXERCISE STATION
INTERSECTION NODE
BRIDGE
CROSSING STATION
CREEK DECK
BASKETBALL COURT
PICKLEBALL COURT
PARK PAVILLION
E
61
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN
CATAMOUNT STREET
CATTAIL POND
SUNDEW LANE
WARBLER WAYFEN WAYBLACKBIRD STREETDAVIS LANECATRON ST
62
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN
CATRON STREET
SANDAN
PARK
CATTAIL
ST
REETFEN WAYBLACKBIRD STREETDAVIS LANEWARBLER WAY63
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN
PROPOSED KIMBERWICKE STREET
BAXTER LANE
PROPOSED RAWHIDE RIDGE
GEORGIA MARIE LANE
EQUESTRIAN LANEPROPOSED HUNTERS WAYHOOVER WAYRENEE WAYSCHOOL
DISTRICT
PARCELS
64
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
BAXTER LANE
TRADE WIND LANE
TURBULENCE LANE
OAK STREET
BREEZE LANE
TSCHACHE LANE HUNTERS WAYBUCKRAKE AVEINITIAL DESIGN - ALT A
65
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
OAK STREET
ANNIE STREET
ROSE STREET
DURSTON ROADBUCKRAKE AVEHUNTERS WAYMONKEY
PARK
INITIAL DESIGN - ALT A
66
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
BAXTER LANE
TRADE WIND LANE
TURBULENCE LANE
OAK STREET
BREEZE LANE
TSCHACHE LANE HUNTERS WAYBUCKRAKE AVEINITIAL DESIGN - ALT A
67
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN - ALT B OAK STREET
ANNIE STREET
ROSE STREET
DURSTON ROADBUCKRAKE AVEHUNTERS WAYMONKEY
PARK
68
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN DURSTON RD
VILLARD STREET
MENDENHALL STREET
BABCOCK STREETHUNTERS WAYMICHAEL GROVE AVEHUNTERS WAYNORTH
MEADOWS
PARK
WILLOW
PARK
69
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | DESIGN SCHEMES
INITIAL DESIGN BABCOCK STREET
MAIN S
T
R
E
E
TVIRGINIA WAYDONNA AVEBOZEMAN
POND PARK GALLATIN
VALLEY
MALL
70
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PRECEDENT IMAGES
APPENDIX
71
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PRECEDENT IMAGES
EXISTING SITE
72
CATTAIL CREEK CORRIDOR
06/24/2024 | PRECEDENT IMAGES
EXISTING SITE
73
Anchor Route and Park Master Plan for the Cattail
Creek Corridor
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Development of a Park Master Plan that encompasses the parks and trails system within the following subdivisions:
Cattail Lake (2 parcels)
Cattail Creek (3 parcels; 1 open space)
Baxter Square (1 open space parcel; 1 park)
West Winds (11 park parcels; 4 open space)
Harvest Creek (3 parcels)
Greenway (2 parcels)
Glenwood Meadows (1 parcel)
Westgate (2 parcels)
Fowler (1 parcel)
Babcock Meadows (2 parcels)
The plan area will also include undeveloped parcels/projects under review between Cattail Street and Baxter and pathway
connections through the Gallatin Valley Mall property and Bozeman Pond Park to Fowler Avenue.
The primary purpose of the master planning process is to plan the Anchor Route, as described in the Parks, Recreation and Active
Transportation Plan (PRAT Plan), that will run from E. Valley Center Road to the Gallatin Valley Mall and Huffine. The Anchor Route
shall fall primarily within parks but alternative locations may be considered where more direct routes provide the best solution or where
environmental impacts of the pathway are deemed to be too significant. Alternatives like split pathways and variations on width and
surfacing may be developed as part of a phasing recommendation or as a response to site-specific constraints are uncovered. Designs
for the Anchor Route should consider the different park contexts
The master plan will also include concept-level programming of the parks for active and passive recreation and recommendations for
natural resource improvements, water conservation, and increasing the tree canopy. Other key themes (equity and balance) and
recreation priorities (nature play, adult fitness, dog parks) identified in the PRAT Plan should be incorporated into the designs along
with additional input from the neighborhood gathered during the community engagement period described below. The soon to be
completed Active Transportation Wayfinding Plan will inform signage locations within the system and should be included in the final
design.
The recommendations/designs in the master plan should be coordinated with and/or will be the “blueprint” for “Branch Out Bozeman”
efforts such as development of a riparian planting guide, planting of native riparian vegetation, replacing turf with drought
tolerant and pollinator friendly species in the upland areas, and constructing trails, benches, and intentional stream access points
(low impact recreation).
As the first park master plan to be completed using the guidance of the PRAT Plan and the City’s first Parks Design Manual, the
designs produced should be translatable to other parks with similar context. Design typicals may be created for insertion into the
Design Manual to describe pathway specifics, riparian planting protocols, and solutions for establishing and emphasizing the
delineation between private lots and public land to avoid conflicts and ensure equitable access and enjoyment. Illustrations may
also be used to communicate the intent of the aforementioned scenarios and others.
74
BACKGROUND and ADDITIONAL DETAILS:
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Early winter 2023/24 – Site visits, Scope of Work, Contract, COB packet delivery to BYLA
Late winter/spring 2024 – Official project kickoff, conceptual design development, community engagement
Summer 2024 – September 28 BIKE YOUR PARK DAY community trails event
Fall 2024 – Project Culmination and Presentation to UPFB and CC
WHAT IS AN ANCHOR ROUTE?:
Visionary
Highly Visible
All ages and abilities
Uninterrupted
All season
Anchor Routes are shared use paths with a minimum width of 12 feet intended to establish unbroken routes linking neighborhoods to
parks and commercial areas. They connect to neighborhood trails and connector pathways to provide a unified network for active
transportation.
HOW WILL THE MASTER PLAN BE USED:
To estimate costs to build out the Anchor Route system and inform the City’s Capital Improvement Plan
To demonstrate AT Wayfinding implementation within the Anchor Route system
To guide development improvements-in-lieu
To communicate about neighborhood-level park enhancement and educate about the PRAT Plan Vision
To develop design typicals for public/private interface in linear parks; riparian planting plans; pathway transitions; low impact
recreation features such as bridges, fishing pads, seating;
To plan for trailside enhancements such as benches, wayfinding, trash, shade, vegetation, drinking water, shelter, restrooms,
bus stops, etc.
RELATED PROJECTS:
Branch Out Bozeman (GWC, TU, Forestry)
East-West Connection/Raptor Route (GVLT; Transportation and Engineering Dept.)
Fowler Avenue Connection (Transportation and Engineering)
Bike/Ped Connectivity Plan (Transportation and Engineering
CITY RESOURCES:
Plat maps and existing park master plans will be provided to BYLA by Project Manager
Coordination with other relevant City/partner projects will be coordinated by Project Manager
ENGAGEMENT PLAN:
To be developed in collaboration with the City of Bozeman Communication and Engagement staff.
75
SCOPE OF WORK:
OUTCOME 1: PARK MASTER PLAN
Description:Consultant will collaborate with the City and Stakeholders to define a final master plan for the proposed Anchor Route
corridor. The master plan will incorporate the City’s identified project goals and priorities from the PRAT plan to locate preferred path
routes, revegetation and tree planting/tree canopy concepts, creek access, seating elements and additional park program features.
Access, equity, habitat enhancement and user experience will all guide the project. The project will include outreach and
community/partner feedback. City will lead outreach, but consultant will support creation of exhibits for engagement and join partner
meetings. Consultant will assume attendance at (2) engagement meetings, and (1) “Bike Your Park” event.
Deliverables:
1. Site analysis including identification of strengths, constraints, and opportunities for implementation of the PRAT Plan and other
project goals Working deliverables may include diagrams, photographs of key conditions and narrative for presentation to
stakeholders. Final presentation will be a digital 11x17 format presentation of key findings.
2. Anchor route placement recommendations/preliminary designs, including:
a. Proposed trail alignments
b. Revegetation and enhancement strategies
c. Location of infill program opportunities such as dog parks, nature play and adult fitness locations.
d. Location of seating elements, creek access, or other low impact recreation along watercourse
e. (3) work session meetings with staff assumed, including initial concept meeting to review up to (2) design alternatives,
(1) synthesis meeting with preferred concept for review, and final meeting to confirm concept plan
f.Up to (2) revisions of preferred concept included.
3. Overall illustrative Master Plan drawing of the entire corridor and CAD file.
4. Cross sections AND/OR plan view design typical(s) illustrating the following common scenarios in Linear and Neighborhood
Parks:
a. 2-3 scenarios orienting different types of riparian plants in the transition from streambank to upland areas; up to 2
scenarios that depict areas needing improvement and 1 scenario illustrating mature riparian plants that were the result
of City requirements (West Winds)
b. Path layout and relationship to surrounding context.
c. Plan view design typical(s) illustrating riparian plant layout from a bird’s eye view.
5. Assume up to (10) cross sections for the entire length of the project.
6. Participation in community outreach events, including up to (5) 24x36 boards or slideshow creation.
Budget: $26,000
OUTCOME 2: PRAT DESIGN MANUAL DESIGN TYPICALS
Description:Consultant will create a series of DD-level, design-intent details to serve as design typicals for future installation of anchor
route elements by the City or authorized private parties. The design-intent details will be developed in concert with the City to identify
the materiality, assemblies and relevant standards for all details. Details will not be full construction, but will help set a standard that all
implementation projects will need to follow to ensure quality construction along anchor routes. Details will be vetted by City staff for
comment prior to completion.
Deliverables:
7. Consultant will develop a series of design-intent details. Details will be delivered in a CAD and PDF format. Details are
anticipated to include the following:
a. Path construction
76
b. Seating elements
c. Park program elements such as fencing, nature play features, and adult fitness.
d. Creek access designs such as steps or docks
e. Planting design typicals and details, including native plants and trees.
Budget: $14,500
OUTCOME 3: DESIGN INTENT ILLUSTRATION
Description:Creation of design visualizations showcasing the character and experience of the proposed park improvements from the
master plan. Visualizations will showcase an activated park, including a diverse set of users and stakeholders, and highlight the new
character of the landscape improvements.
Deliverables:
8. (2-3) High Resolution Design visualizations in PNG or JPEG format
Budget: $6750
OUTCOME 4: ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH MATERIALS
Description:Consultants will design and provide materials for public engagement and communication including digital and print formats
to communicate about the scope of the project and any design questions or scenarios that are appropriate for public review as determined
in the project’s engagement and communications plans.
Deliverables:
9. Up to 3 event posters
10. 3-5 social media designs
11. 1 revision of each of the aforementioned items
Budget: $2500K
77