Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-27-24 City Commission Agenda and Packet MaterialsA. Call to Order - 6:00 PM - Commission Room, City Hall, 121 North Rouse B. Pledge of Allegiance and a Moment of Silence or Mindfulness C. Changes to the Agenda D. Authorize Absence D.1 Authorize the Absence of Deputy Mayor Morrison (Maas) E. FYI F. Commission Disclosures G. Consent G.1 Accounts Payable Claims Review and Approval (Armstrong) THE CITY COMMISSION OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, August 27, 2024 How to Participate: If you are interested in commenting in writing on items on the agenda please send an email to comments@bozeman.net or visit the Public Comment Page prior to 12:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Public comments will also be accepted in-person and through video conference during the appropriate agenda items but you may only comment once per item. As always, the meeting will be recorded and streamed through the Commission's video page and available in the City on cable channel 190. For more information please contact the City Clerks' Office at 406.582.2320. This meeting will be held both in-person and also using an online video conferencing system. You can join this meeting: Via Video Conference: Click the Register link, enter the required information, and click submit. Click Join Now to enter the meeting. Via Phone: This is for listening only if you cannot watch the stream, channel 190, or attend in- person United States Toll +1 669 900 9128 Access code: 933 7244 1920 Consider the Motion: I move to authorize the absence of Deputy Mayor Morrison. 1 G.2 Reject All Bids for Construction of the River Health Project – Mechanical Stormwater Treatment Project (Phase 4) and Rebid the Project at a Later Date(Oliver) G.3 Authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the attached agreement with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) for utilities relocates associated with MDT work on North 19th Avenue(Kohtz) G.4 Authorize City Manager to Sign the Professional Services Agreement With 120Water to Coordinate the Lead and Copper Sampling in Compliance Period 2025.(Miller) G.5 Authorize the City Manager to sign a PSA with Apex Group Inc. for the Repair of the Rouse Parking Lot.(Focken) G.6 Authorize the City Manager to Sign Amendment Three to the Professional Services Agreement with KLJ Engineering for the Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge.(Fontenot) G.7 Resolution 5619 Creation of Special Improvement Lighting District 786 Urban + Farm Phase 1(Hodnett) G.8 Resolution 5634, a Resolution of the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, Confirming the Appointment of Police Officers in Accordance with Montana Code Annotated 7-32-4108 and 7-32-4113.(Veltkamp) H. Public Comment on Non-agenda Items Falling Within the Purview and Jurisdiction of the Commission I. Special Presentation I.1 National Community Survey Special Presentation(Clark) J. Action Items J.1 Resolution 5608, Establishing Tree Maintenance District Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024- 2025 (FY25).(Hodnett) J.2 Resolution 5623, Establishing and Affixing the Number of Mills to be Charged Against the Assessed Valuation of All Taxable Property Situated Within the Corporate Jurisdictional Boundaries of the City for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (FY25)(Hodnett) This is the time to comment on any matter falling within the scope of the Bozeman City Commission. There will also be time in conjunction with each agenda item for public comment relating to that item but you may only speak once per topic. Please note, the City Commission cannot take action on any item which does not appear on the agenda. All persons addressing the City Commission shall speak in a civil and courteous manner and members of the audience shall be respectful of others. Please state your name, and state whether you are a resident of the city or a property owner within the city in an audible tone of voice for the record and limit your comments to three minutes. Written comments can be located in the Public Comment Repository. Consider the Motion: I move to adopt Commission Resolution No. 5608 establishing a 3% increase in Tree Maintenance District Assessments for FY25, making the assessment rate $0.004194 per assessable square foot. 2 J.3 NEHMU Zone Text Amendment to Modify Table 38.310.040.C of the City's Development Code to Allow Apartments as a Permitted Use with No Restrictions in Area on the Second and Subsequent Floors, and Basements of Buildings, and to Allow Lobbies on the Ground Floor When Associated with Residential Uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District), Application 24225.(Cramblet) K. Appointments K.1 Appointment to the Library Board of Trustees(Maas) L. FYI / Discussion M. Adjournment Consider the Motion: I move to approve Resolution 5623. Consider the Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, application materials, public comment, recommendation of the Community Development Board in their capacity as the Zoning Commission, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 24225 and move to approve the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Consider the Motion: I move to appoint one member to the Library Board of Trustees for a term ending June 30, 2029. City Commission meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our Acting ADA Coordinator, Max Ziegler, at 406.582.2439. Commission meetings are televised live on cable channel 190 and streamed live on our Meeting Videos Page. 3 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Mike Maas, City Clerk SUBJECT:Authorize the Absence of Deputy Mayor Morrison MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Administration RECOMMENDATION:Consider the Motion: I move to authorize the absence of Deputy Mayor Morrison. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.1 Outreach: Continue to strengthen and innovate in how we deliver information to the community and our partners. BACKGROUND:Deputy Mayor Morrison announced his intended absence. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:None FISCAL EFFECTS:None Report compiled on: August 14, 2024 4 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Nicole Armstrong, Accounts Payable Clerk Rhonda Edwards, Accounts Payable Clerk Aaron Funk, City Controller Melissa Hodnett, Finance Director SUBJECT:Accounts Payable Claims Review and Approval MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Finance RECOMMENDATION:The City Commission is recommended to make a motion and approve payment of claims as presented. STRATEGIC PLAN:7.5. Funding and Delivery of City Services: Use equitable and sustainable sources of funding for appropriate City services, and deliver them in a lean and efficient manner. BACKGROUND:Montana Code Annotated, Section 7-6-4301 requires claims to be presented to the City Commission within one year of the date the claims accrued. Claims presented to the City Commission under this item have been reviewed and validated by the Finance Department. The Department has ensured that all goods and services have been received along with necessary authorizations and supporting documentation. Please provide approval for checks dated August 28th, 2024. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:The City Commission could decide not to approve these claims or a portion of the claims presented. This alternative is not recommended as it may result in unbudgeted late fees assessed against the City. FISCAL EFFECTS:The total amount of the claims to be paid is presented at the bottom of the Expenditure Approval List posted on the City’s website at https://www.bozeman.net/departments/finance/purchasing. Report compiled on: August 21, 2024 5 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Shawn Kohtz, Utilities Director Adam Oliver, Stormwater Program Manager SUBJECT:Reject All Bids for Construction of the River Health Project – Mechanical Stormwater Treatment Project (Phase 4) and Rebid the Project at a Later Date MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Reject All Bids for the Construction of the River Health Project – Mechanical Stormwater Treatment Project (Phase 4) and Rebid the Project at a Later Date STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:Bids for the River Health Project – Mechanical Stormwater Treatment Project (Phase 4) were opened on June 20, with three bids being submitted. Central Plumbing and Heating Excavation submitted the lowest bid of $369,932.00, 155% over the engineer’s estimate and not within the allocated budgets for STRH02. Therefore, in our commitment to the project's success, City Staff recommends rejecting these bids and re-estimating and budgeting for re- advertising in a future fiscal year. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:Amend the existing FY25 budget and authorize the Interim City Manager to sign the Notice of Award to Central Plumbing and Heating Excavation for the Base Bid Total of $369,932.00. FISCAL EFFECTS:None Attachments: 2024 Stormwater Improvements E. Peach St and E. Tamarack.pdf Report compiled on: August 9, 2024 6 Name:Contractor #:Affirmation Form:Bid Bond:Base Bid Total: Central Plumbing and Heating Excavation 437 Foss Flats Road Belgrade, MT 59714 4443 X X $369,932.00 Battle Ridge Builders 354 Countryside Ln. Belgrade, MT 59714 163642 X X $424,680.00 Sime Construction 190 Ramshorn Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718 5354 X X $382,047.00 Mike Maas Russ Smith City Clerk Project Coordinator Bid Check:Delivered to Finance:Accepted By:Date: BID - 2024 Stormwater Improvements E. Peach St and E. Tamarack These bids were opened and read before the undersigned at 2:00 pm on Thursday, June 20, 2024. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A547C41-030D-4091-83D9-A0C5C65AAE77 7242 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Shawn Kohtz, Director of Utilities SUBJECT:Authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the attached agreement with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) for utilities relocates associated with MDT work on North 19th Avenue MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the Interim City Manager to execute the attached agreement with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) for utilities relocates associated with MDT work on North 19th Avenue. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:Montana Department of Transportation reallocated funds from other areas of the State to perform major maintenance work on the N. 19th Avenue corridor along with some corridor and pedestrian ramp improvements at intersections. This was a “last-minute” reallocation of funds that benefits streets within City limits and will improve ADA infrastructure along the corridor. Plans for the project are attached. Pursuant to MDT’s attached contract and to mobilize the federal funds reallocated by MDT to the project, MDT requires the City to pay 25% of the costs of relocating elements of sewer and water utilities to accommodate the work. MDT will pay a 75% share of the utility relocate costs. The project will adjust 12 water valve boxes and 8 manhole rims in the water and sewer systems, respectively. The attached agreement was reviewed by Assistant City Attorney Kaity Cuellar and Utilities Director Shawn Kohtz. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:N/A ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission FISCAL EFFECTS:The anticipated fiscal effect to the City is $3,700 from the Water Fund and $4,500 from the Sewer Fund. As this is a last-minute project from MDT, these funds were not anticipated and subsequently not budgeted in fiscal 8 year 2025. Staff will return to City Commission with a budget amendment at the end of fiscal year 2025 to accommodate the project costs in order to receive the larger benefit of the reallocated federal funds to the project. Attachments: 9478000_CITY OF BOZEMAN_928_Agreement.pdf MDT N 19th Improvement PLANS.pdf Report compiled on: August 8, 2024 9 Christopher Dorrington, Director 2701 Prospect ▪ PO Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1001 Right of Way Bureau – Utility Section Phone: (406) 444–6080 Fax: (406) 444–6091 MDT-ROW-928 Rev. 06/24 An Equal Opportunity Employer Engineering Division TTY: (800) 335–7592 Web Page: www.mdt.mt.gov UTILITY AGREEMENT Designation: N 19th Avenue - Bozeman I/C Project ID: NH 412-1(5)0 Gallatin County Uniform Project No.: 9478000 This Agreement is entered into this date ______________________ between the State of Montana, acting through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the “STATE”, and the City of Bozeman, owner of the utility, hereinafter called the “OWNER”. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS the STATE proposes to construct a public highway to be known as N 19th Avenue - Bozeman in Gallatin County, State of Montana, and designated as Highway Project NH 412-1(5)0, as shown on plans submitted to Owner, and WHEREAS, that public highway is to be constructed over and near the present highway right-of-way known as N 19th Avenue - Bozeman, where certain Water and sanitary sewer facilities under the jurisdiction of OWNER are in conflict with the construction of the public highway, as shown by “Exhibit A”, and WHEREAS STATE and OWNER agree that it is necessary and in the public interest of all parties that some of the existing facilities be adjusted, repaired, replaced, and relocated, and WHEREAS, STATE and OWNER agree that the construction of the public highway and all the work, including adjustment, replacement, repair, and relocation of certain existing facilities, be included in the contract entered into by STATE and a private contractor, and that the manner of performing the construction referred to in the Agreement is in the best interest of the STATE and OWNER. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual obligations contained herein, STATE and OWNER agree that: 1. STATE will let a project for the construction of the public highway, including the work covered in this Agreement, as shown by “Exhibit A.” 2. Pursuant to the authority granted to OWNER by the laws of Montana, OWNER grants to STATE the authority to adjust, replace, repair, and relocate those facilities under the jurisdiction of OWNER which presently occupy part of the proposed right-of-way. 3. All construction preformed pursuant to this Agreement shall be done in accordance with the then-current Standard Specifications for the Road and Bridge Construction, Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, and the 10 Christopher Dorrington, Director 2701 Prospect ▪ PO Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1001 Right of Way Bureau – Utility Section Phone: (406) 444–6080 Fax: (406) 444–6091 MDT-ROW-928 Rev. 06/24 An Equal Opportunity Employer Engineering Division TTY: (800) 335–7592 Web Page: www.mdt.mt.gov Plans, Specifications and Special Provisions of the construction or improvements for the project prepared by OWNER, all of which are by this reference incorporated and made a part of this Agreement. 4. The adjustments to the facilities referred to in this Agreement cover only that segment of the water & sanitary sewer system of OWNER directly affected by the construction of the highway and STATE and OWNER will determine which adjustments to facilities of OWNER are necessary; and the STATE shall, in accordance with the plans, construct the most economical type of facilities in the new location that will meet the same service requirements of the old facilities in the old location. 5. The OWNER will pay the STATE for the actual cost of work accomplished on the OWNER’S line based on contract bid prices. An additional 8% will be applied to the billing of construction costs to cover the cost of Traffic Control and an additional 8% to cover the cost of Mobilization. Section 17-1-106. MCA requires any state agency, including the STATE, that receives non-general funds to identify and recover its indirect costs. These costs are in addition to direct project costs. STATE’S indirect cost rate is determined annually as a percentage of the project’s direct costs to cover the project’s share of STATE’S indirect costs as defined by 2 CFR Part 225 (formerly OMB Circular A-87). STATE’S current indirect cost rate is 11.32% for fiscal year 2025 (July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025). For this project, STATE billings to the OWNER will include a charge for the indirect costs at the current fiscal year indirect cost rate, which amount will be applied toward the total project contribution of the OWNER. [Note: If this project extends across more than one fiscal year, more than one annual rate will be involved, as the rates may change during the life of the project.] 6. The total estimated cost of the adjustments currently is $25,400.00 Proportionate participation is STATE $ 19,050.00 (75%); and OWNER $ 6,350.00 (25 %), plus $ 508.00 (8%) charge for Traffic Control and $ 508.00 (8%) for Mobilization, and an additional $ 833.83 (11.32 %) charge for Indirect Cost (IDC). The total estimated cost to OWNER is $ 8,199.83. The total project costs are $ 27,249.83. Copies of cost estimate and plans indicating facility adjustments are hereby attached as “Exhibit A” and made a part of this Agreement. The STATE’S obligation under this Agreement shall be in accordance with all applicable State and Federal laws in existence on the date of execution of this Agreement. 7. By state statute, STATE will not reimburse OWNER for engineering costs for designing, location, staking, inspecting or any other incidental costs for engineering. 11 Christopher Dorrington, Director 2701 Prospect ▪ PO Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1001 Right of Way Bureau – Utility Section Phone: (406) 444–6080 Fax: (406) 444–6091 MDT-ROW-928 Rev. 06/24 An Equal Opportunity Employer Engineering Division TTY: (800) 335–7592 Web Page: www.mdt.mt.gov 8. The adjustments agreed to in Item No. 6 above are based on the STATE paying 75% of relocation costs, excepting betterments, if any, where facilities occupy public road or street rights-of-way. The OWNER will be billed in advance for its portion of the estimated total costs of the project no more than sixty (60) days before bid opening. Although the anticipated expenses will have been discussed with OWNER representatives before that time, the STATE will provide a detailed breakdown of all estimated costs with the billing. The OWNER will submit payment to the STATE within thirty (30) days of billing. The STATE will not proceed further with the project’s development if payment is not made within (30) days of billing. If the federal government requires a reimbursement or return of any federal funds because a project doesn’t advance due to OWNER’S failure to make any scheduled payment, the OWNER agrees that it will reimburse the STATE for those federal funds within thirty (30) days of billing. If, after initial payment is made, bid opening or contract award by the STATE is delayed or postponed by 30 days or more, or canceled for any reason, the STATE agrees to immediately refund OWNER’S initial payment upon the OWNER’S request. If the OWNER’S share of the cost of the awarded project exceeds the amount paid by the OWNER, the OWNER will pay the excess. The contact for billing, accounting and change order questions for the OWNER shall be: City of Bozeman Attn: Chuck Winn 121 N Rouse Avenue Bozeman, MT 59775 The final invoice to be reviewed by OWNER. Within six (6) months after the project has finally been accepted with the final costs submitted, the STATE will submit a final statement to the OWNER. The final statement will provide details of any expenses that may be identified as “miscellaneous”. The final statement will include a refund of unspent portions of the OWNER’S initial payment, payable to the OWNER in an amount equaling the difference between that payment and the OWNER’S share of the final costs. If the final statement exceeds the OWNER’S payments thus far, the OWNER will remit to the STATE within thirty (30) days of the final statement the difference between OWNER’S share of final costs and OWNER’S earlier payment. If payment is not made within that thirty (30) day period, interest on the unpaid amount will accrue at the rate of 10% per year and continue to accrue until paid in full. If the OWNER is billed for additional funds, STATE will not participate in any future funding agreements with the OWNER until full payment, including interest, is received from the OWNER. 12 Christopher Dorrington, Director 2701 Prospect ▪ PO Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1001 Right of Way Bureau – Utility Section Phone: (406) 444–6080 Fax: (406) 444–6091 MDT-ROW-928 Rev. 06/24 An Equal Opportunity Employer Engineering Division TTY: (800) 335–7592 Web Page: www.mdt.mt.gov Payments to this project will be coordinated through the STATE’S Administration Division (to be directed to MDT’s Accounts Receivable Collections Technician and Accounting Systems Operations Supervisor). Payments to this project will be provided to the above STATE staff in the form of a check to be credited to this project. 9. The award of the contract including the highway construction and OWNER water and sanitary sewer line relocation will be based on the successful bidder of the combined contract, as determined, and accepted by STATE. 10. OWNER agrees to cooperate fully with the STATE in all aspects of the work contemplated by this Agreement. 11. OWNER acknowledges that it has reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the facilities covered by this Agreement. 12. STATE and OWNER agree that when the construction encompassed by this Agreement is completed and accepted by STATE and concurred in by OWNER all responsibility of STATE ceases. 13. Records of the OWNER pertaining to this project will be subject to inspection at any time by representatives of the STATE, including the legislative auditor and fiscal analyst, and the Federal Highway Administration. Project records must be retained for a period of not less than three years from the date of final payment. 14. Inspection for all phases of work on OWNER’S facility will be provided by OWNER. Contact, questions, or discussions about contractor work will be directed to the STATE’S Project Manager. No direct contact shall occur between the OWNER and Contractor. 15. This Agreement is subject to the terms and provisions of Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 645, Subpart A and B, and subsequent amendments, Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations in existence on the date of execution of this Agreement. The Code of Federal Regulations are hereby incorporated in and made part of this Agreement by reference to the extent that is applicable to this Agreement and not inconsistent therewith. 16. NONDISCRIMINATION If the OWNER enters into a contract or agreement with a contractor to perform any of the work which the OWNER is required to perform under the terms of this agreement, the OWNER, for itself, its assigns, and successors in interest, agrees that it will not discriminate in the choice of contractors and will include all the nondiscrimination provisions set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof, in any such contract or agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. 13 Christopher Dorrington, Director 2701 Prospect ▪ PO Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1001 Right of Way Bureau – Utility Section Phone: (406) 444–6080 Fax: (406) 444–6091 MDT-ROW-928 Rev. 06/24 An Equal Opportunity Employer Engineering Division TTY: (800) 335–7592 Web Page: www.mdt.mt.gov It is understood that the OWNER is responsible for obtaining any permits required for adjustment of its facility. City of Bozeman City Manager or Designee Date Signature Printed Name State of Montana Department of Transportation Manager – R/W Utilities Section Date Signature Printed Name Approved for Legal Content Date Signature Printed Name SG:rm 14 MDT-ROW-904 11/20 Page 1 of 1 Montana Department of Transportation Summary of Costs Subject Item No.Quantities Unit Unit Cost Total Unit Cost 603014242 12 Each $950.00 $11,400.00 604000100 8 Each $1,750.00 $14,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25,400.00 75% x $25,400.00 $19,050.00 $19,050.00 25% x $25,400.00 $6,350.00 8% x $6,350.00 $508.00 8% x $6,350.00 $508.00 $7,366.00 11.32% x $7,366.00 $833.83 $8,199.83 $27,249.83 Note: SG: dn EXHIBIT A Description Adjust Valve Box Adjust Manhole OWNER'S COST SHARE MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL IDC PROJECT TOTAL for City of Bozeman TOTAL MDT'S RESPONSIBILITY MDT COST SHARE TOTAL NH 412-1(5)0 N 19th Avenue Bozeman Control No. 9478000 SUB-TOTAL TOTAL OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY 15 BOZEMANGALLATINCOUNTYSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TITLE FOR UTILITY PIH 1N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 94780000 UTILITY PLANS 4/4/2024 1:53 PM 9478000UTTTL001.DWG PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINEEXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINERAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINECLSECTION LINEOWNERSHIP BOUNDARYPRESENT TRAVELED WAY (P.T.W.)GATE IN FENCEPROPOSED GUARDRAILEXISTING GUARDRAILFENCE LINEPOWER POLE IN PLACETELEPHONE POLE IN PLACEPROPOSED CULVERTEXISTING DITCHBRIDGESRAILROADSPARCEL NUMBERSPROPERTY CORNER PINUTILITY POLES IN POSSIBLE CONFLICTSECTION CORNERRIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTFOUNDUNFOUNDFOUNDUNFOUNDW/ ANCHORLIGHT POLE - GUY POLEPOWERTELPEDESTALSMANHOLESUNKNOWNELECSTORMSANTELVALVESWATERGASFIBER OPTICGASPOWEROVERHEADUNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUNDOVERHEADTELEPHONETELEVISIONUNDERGROUNDOVERHEADSANITARY SEWERWATERFIRE HYDRANTUNDERGROUNDAPPROACH: EXIST.- PROPOSEDCATTLE GUARD: EXIST.- PROPOSEDEXISTING CULVERTWETLANDS NOT IMPACTEDWETLANDS IMPACTEDPPTPMHMHMHMHMHWVGV2¼ SECTION CORNERCENTERLINE OR PROJECTED LINEOVERHEADPLAN LEGENDFO-OHFOGASPWR-OHPWRTEL-OHTELTV-OHTVSANWFULL ACCESS CONTROLLIMITED ACCESS CONTROLEXISTING FULL ACCESS CONTROLEXISTING LIMITED ACCESS CONTROLACACELACEFACFOUNDCALCULATEDTOP OF CUTCONSTRUCTION LIMITS CUT SECTION TOE OF FILLFLATHEADGLACIERLAKESANDERSTOOLEPONDERATETONLEWISANDCLARKLIBERTYHILLCASCADEMEAGHERJUDITHBASINPOWELLMISSOULAGRANITEBROADWATERWHEATLANDFERGUSBLAINEGOLDENVALLEYPHILLIPSPETROLEUMMUSSELSHELLVALLEYGARFIELDROSEBUDDANIELSMC CONEPRAIRIESHERIDANROOSEVELTRICHLANDDAWSONWIBAUXCUSTERFALLONCARTERPOWDERRIVERBIG HORNYELLOWSTONESTILLWATERCARBONPARKGALLATINJEFFERSONMADISONSILVERBOWRAVALLIBEAVERHEAD CHOUTEAULINCOLNSWEET GRASSLODGEDEER TREASUREMINERALMONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFEDERAL AID PROJECT NH 412-1(1)0N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMANGALLATIN COUNTYUTILITY PLAN OFLENGTH 2.6 MILESP.E.ASSOCIATED PROJECTAGREEMENT NUMBERSI.C.R/W##############################RELATED PROJECTSFOR EXISTING R/W RETRACEMENT, SEE#########THIS PROJECTTOBELGRADER. 5 E.T. 1 S.T. 2 S.R. 6 E.RP 0.4 TO RP 3.0 THIS CONTRACT STA. 33+07.00BEGIN NH 412-1(2)0STA. 33+07.00ON HDP-IR 9113(001) =STA. 12+14.52ON M-1201(3)STA. 229+04.15END NH 412-1(2)0 =STA. 35+26.00 RP 0.5S00412000+04791 (BR ID 06763)341.9' x 66.6' BRIDGE IN PL.INT N 19TH AVEIR 9113 (001)THIS CONTRACT16 SUMMARYSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY SUMMARIES FOR UTILITY PIH 3N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:54 PM 9478000UTSUM001.DWG 17 160+00 170+00 ST 170+44 . 5 5 CS 168+94.5 5 Mid 164+49.74WV MH MH MH MH MHWVSDDI SD STA 169+14, 44' LTSEWER MHSTA 171+21, 41' LTSEWER MHSTA 173+62, 43' LTSEWER MHSTA 164+82, 66' LTWATER VALVETSCHACHE LN N 19TH AVE180+00 28+83.28 STPU 1201(4) =177+17.57 AR 94111180+00 190+00 PI 177+71.58WVWVWV MH MH FHWV SDDIFHWVBBBDIMHPBSTA 178+31, 37' LTSEWER MHW OAK ST N 19TH AVET. #####R. ##### SEC. ## T. #####R. ##### SEC. ##SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 17N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 1:42 PM 9478000UTPLN001.DWG #### 18 200+00 2+39.34PC STPU 1201(4) 35+83.14 M-1201(3) = 1+19.33 STPU 1201(4) 4+89.34PT STPU 1201(4) 5+34.21PC STPU 1201(4) 8+09.63PT STPU 1201(4) 190+00 200+00 PC 198+45.23 PC 201+65.52 PT 201+20.65 PT 204+15.52 Mid 199+82.94 Mid 202+90.52 WV WV WV MH MH FHWV FHWV PBSTA 204+49, 23' RTSEWER MHSTA 204+80, 40' LTWATER VALVESTA 204+67, 27' RTWATER VALVESTA 204+83, 37' RTWATER VALVEDURSTON RDN 19TH AVESTA 204+87, 59' LTWATER VALVESTA 204+87, 67' RTWATER VALVE220+00 35+83.14 M-1201(3) =1+19.33 STPU 1201(4)210+00 220+00 WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV MH MH MH MHTEL MHTEL WV FHFH WV WVSTA 208+58, 24' RTSEWER MHSTA 208+59, 28' LTTELEPHONE MHSTA 212+69, 26' RTSEWER MHSTA 216+71, 33' RTSEWER MHSTA 216+97, 25' LTTELEPHONE MHSTA 217+46, 31' RTWATER VALVESTA 211+27, 40' RTWATER VALVESTA 211+17, 38' LTWATER VALVEBEALL STN 19TH AVET. #####R. ##### SEC. ## T. #####R. ##### SEC. ##SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 18N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 1:42 PM 9478000UTPLN001.DWG 19 231+16 220+00 13+19.60PC M-1201(3) 18+21.30PTM-1201(3)220+00 230+00 231+16 EP 231+15.67 PC 228+15.67 PC 222+97.37 PT 227+99.07 Mid 229+65.67 Mid 225+48.22 WV WV WV WV WV WVWV MH MH MH MH MH MH TEL WV WVWHSTA 225+78, 23' RTTELEPHONE MHSTA 228+76, 42' RTWATER VALVESTA 227+10, 18' RTWATER VALVEMAIN STN 19TH AVESTA 227+39, 78' LTWATER VALVET. #####R. ##### SEC. ##SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 19N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 1:42 PM 9478000UTPLN001.DWG 20 BOZEMANGALLATINCOUNTYSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TITLE FOR UTILITY PIH 1N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 94780000 UTILITY PLANS 4/4/2024 1:53 PM 9478000UTTTL001.DWG PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINEEXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINERAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINECLSECTION LINEOWNERSHIP BOUNDARYPRESENT TRAVELED WAY (P.T.W.)GATE IN FENCEPROPOSED GUARDRAILEXISTING GUARDRAILFENCE LINEPOWER POLE IN PLACETELEPHONE POLE IN PLACEPROPOSED CULVERTEXISTING DITCHBRIDGESRAILROADSPARCEL NUMBERSPROPERTY CORNER PINUTILITY POLES IN POSSIBLE CONFLICTSECTION CORNERRIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTFOUNDUNFOUNDFOUNDUNFOUNDW/ ANCHORLIGHT POLE - GUY POLEPOWERTELPEDESTALSMANHOLESUNKNOWNELECSTORMSANTELVALVESWATERGASFIBER OPTICGASPOWEROVERHEADUNDERGROUNDUNDERGROUNDOVERHEADTELEPHONETELEVISIONUNDERGROUNDOVERHEADSANITARY SEWERWATERFIRE HYDRANTUNDERGROUNDAPPROACH: EXIST.- PROPOSEDCATTLE GUARD: EXIST.- PROPOSEDEXISTING CULVERTWETLANDS NOT IMPACTEDWETLANDS IMPACTEDPPTPMHMHMHMHMHWVGV2¼ SECTION CORNERCENTERLINE OR PROJECTED LINEOVERHEADPLAN LEGENDFO-OHFOGASPWR-OHPWRTEL-OHTELTV-OHTVSANWFULL ACCESS CONTROLLIMITED ACCESS CONTROLEXISTING FULL ACCESS CONTROLEXISTING LIMITED ACCESS CONTROLACACELACEFACFOUNDCALCULATEDTOP OF CUTCONSTRUCTION LIMITS CUT SECTION TOE OF FILLFLATHEADGLACIERLAKESANDERSTOOLEPONDERATETONLEWISANDCLARKLIBERTYHILLCASCADEMEAGHERJUDITHBASINPOWELLMISSOULAGRANITEBROADWATERWHEATLANDFERGUSBLAINEGOLDENVALLEYPHILLIPSPETROLEUMMUSSELSHELLVALLEYGARFIELDROSEBUDDANIELSMC CONEPRAIRIESHERIDANROOSEVELTRICHLANDDAWSONWIBAUXCUSTERFALLONCARTERPOWDERRIVERBIG HORNYELLOWSTONESTILLWATERCARBONPARKGALLATINJEFFERSONMADISONSILVERBOWRAVALLIBEAVERHEAD CHOUTEAULINCOLNSWEET GRASSLODGEDEER TREASUREMINERALMONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFEDERAL AID PROJECT NH 412-1(1)0N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMANGALLATIN COUNTYUTILITY PLAN OFLENGTH 2.6 MILESP.E.ASSOCIATED PROJECTAGREEMENT NUMBERSI.C.R/W##############################RELATED PROJECTSFOR EXISTING R/W RETRACEMENT, SEE#########THIS PROJECTTOBELGRADER. 5 E.T. 1 S.T. 2 S.R. 6 E.RP 0.4 TO RP 3.0 THIS CONTRACT STA. 33+07.00BEGIN NH 412-1(2)0STA. 33+07.00ON HDP-IR 9113(001) =STA. 12+14.52ON M-1201(3)STA. 229+04.15END NH 412-1(2)0 =STA. 35+26.00 RP 0.5S00412000+04791 (BR ID 06763)341.9' x 66.6' BRIDGE IN PL.INT N 19TH AVEIR 9113 (001)THIS CONTRACT21 CENTERLINE COORDINATE TABLE - N. 19THSTATIONDESCRIPTIONNORTHING OR YCOORDINATEEASTING OR XCOORDINATEREMARKS9+97.51POT540214.6471568509.77111+22.47TS540176.4331568628.74913+72.47SC540089.7401568863.03420+46.31PI539801.7021569472.20625+46.09CS539131.2241569405.01127+96.09ST538885.7771569358.52927+96.61PC538885.2701569358.41032+45.17PI538449.0011569254.12133+07.00POC538391.6681569228.724BEGIN PROJECT36+93.27PT538022.2241569116.03043+12.50TS537433.5821568923.81844+62.50SC537290.6431568878.34848+59.77PI536910.2691568763.71652+53.18CS536513.5151568743.38054+03.18ST536363.6161568737.99083+42.67TS533425.3021568654.80384+92.67SC533275.3301568652.52190+13.36PI532754.6731568658.231155+09.34CS532308.9591568927.404156+59.34ST532182.6391569008.277158+54.94TS532019.3041569115.888160+04.94SC531892.8121569196.483164+61.02PI531500.8641569429.698168+94.55CS531044.7891569426.649170+44.55ST530894.9071569421.067177+71.58PI530168.8801569382.915198+45.23PC528095.4061569409.975199+83.36PI530168.8801569382.915201+20.65PT527822.0471569439.925201+65.52PC527778.1081569449.017202+91.24PI527654.9111569474.084204+15.52PT527529.4251569466.411222+97.37PC525650.5071569361.349225+48.86PI525399.4231569347.032227+99.07PT525154.6741569289.186228+15.67PC525138.5151569285.386SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TABLE OF CONTENTS, NOTES FOR UTILITY PIH 2N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 4/4/2024 1:53 PM 9478000UTTTL001.DWG BASIS OF PLAN QUANTITIES(QUANTITIES FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY)COMP. AGGREGATE WEIGHT= 3700 LBS. PER CUBIC YARDCOMP. WEIGHT OF PL. MIX BIT. SURF.= 3855 LBS. PER CUBIC YARDASPHALT CEMENT - GRADE S - 3/4" AGG.= 5.4% OF PL.MIX BIT.SURF.HYDRATED LIME= 1.4% OF PL.MIX BIT.SURF.BITUMINOUS MATERIAL= 8.5 LBS. PER GAL.EMULSIFIED ASPHALT - TACK (ALL OTHER SURFACES)= 0.05 GAL. PER SQ.YARD (UNDILUTED)EMULSIFIED ASPHALT - TACK (CONCRETE SURFACES)= 0.10 GAL. PER SQ.YARD (UNDILUTED)SEAL= 0.42 GAL. PER SQ.YARDCOVER= 25 LBS. PER SQ.YARDNOTESUTILITIESCALL THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER (811) OR OTHERNOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE MARKING AND LOCATION OF ALL LINES ANDSERVICES BEFORE EXCAVATING. ALL CLEARANCES OR DEPTHS PROVIDEDFOR UTILITIES ARE FROM EXISTING GROUND LINE.PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENTSALL MONUMENTS TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED OR RESET BY STATEFORCES.DO NOT DISTURBPLACEHOLDERWETLANDSWETLANDS MAY EXIST ADJACENT TO THE ROADWAY AND BEYOND THEPROJECT LIMITS. A WETLAND DELINEATION HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED FORTHIS PROJECT. IMPACTS TO WETLAND AREAS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED INASSOCIATION WITH THE PROPOSED WORK. NO PERMITS HAVE BEENOBTAINED. ANY ACTION IMPACTING WETLAND AREAS WITHOUT THEAPPROPRIATE PERMITTING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.12234-8MAINLINEMILLING LIMITS AT INTERSECTIONS4-67-8TABLE OF CONTENTSUTILITY PLANSSHEET NO.TITLE SHEETTABLE OF CONTENTSNOTESSUMMARIESPLAN SHEETS22 SUMMARYSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY SUMMARIES FOR UTILITY PIH 3N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:54 PM 9478000UTSUM001.DWG 23 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1MAINLINE36+89.70B.E.TO38+93.27THEN TO TYP. NO. 2QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet23.49square yards PER STATION6441,364682cubic yards PER STATION87.0tons PER STATION9.061.15tons PER STATION167.7gals. PER STATION68square yards PER STATION644* BASED ON 2 APPLICATIONSTYPICAL SECTION NO. 2MAINLINE38+93.27TO41+31.43QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet11.47square yards PER STATION644652652cubic yards PER STATION42.5tons PER STATION4.421.15tons PER STATION81.9gals. PER STATION33square yards PER STATION644* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION0.40' COLD MILLING℄15.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD25.7'COLD MILLING & TACK0.40' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.34.7'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING31.7'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING5.0'RAISEDMEDIAN34.0'24.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER35.7'COLD MILLING & TACK℄15.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD24.4'COLD MILLING & TACK33.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING30.3'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTINGVARIESTURN LANE34.0'24.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER34.3'COLD MILLING & TACK0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.13.0'TURN LANE1.0'1.0'EX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:1VARIESRAISEDMEDIAN1.0'1.0'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 4N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 24 4.0'SHLD.QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGGEOTEXTILECOVERPLANTMIXCR. AGG.COURSESPECIALBORROWASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AGG. TREAT.AREA square feet41.3543.8073.00square yards PER STATION91927574062,356405.6cubic yards PER STATION153.10162.2270.4tons PER STATION17.121.64tons PER STATION295.1gals. PER STATION137.90square yards PER STATION919* BASED ON 3 APPLICATIONSVARIES*MILL/OVERLAYVARIES*3.7'TYPE "A"MED. CURB& CONC.CAPVARIES*12.0'TURN LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANEVARIES*TRAVEL LANE4.0'SHLD.N. 19THTYPICAL SECTION NO. 341+31.43TO43+21.21INTERSECTION DETAIL43+21.21ONLY43+21.21TO44+30.96TRANS. TYP. NO. 3 TO TYP. NO. 4MILL/OVERLAY37.0'1.0'SHLD.EXISTING C.&G.AND WALK5.0'NEWSIDEWALKNEWC.&G.16.0'FULL RECONSTRUCTFULL RECONSTRUCT20.5'12.0'TRAVEL LANEVARIES*TRAVEL LANEMATCH EXISTING CROSS SLOPE 0.20' MILL/OVERLAY 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROW40.0'SEAL & COVER41.7' SEAL & COVERSEPARATION GEOTEXTILESAWCUT LINEPROFILE GRADE=EXISTING GRADE6:11.0'SHLD.N. 19THTYPICAL SECTION NO. 4VARIES*MILL/OVERLAYVARIES*3.7'TYPE "A"MED. CURB &CONC. CAPVARIES*5.0'NEWSIDEWALK44+30.96TO46+12.32TYP. NO. 446+12.32TO47+09.45TRANS. TYP. NO. 4 TO TYP. NO. 512.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TURN LANESTRIPEDGOREVARIES**12.0'TURN LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE4.0'SHLD.NEWC.&G.MILL/OVERLAYVARIES*EXISTING C.&G.AND WALK 0.20' MILL AND OVERLAY4.0'SHLD.1.0'SHLD.12.0'TURN LANE16.0'FULL RECONSTRUCT20.5'FULL RECONSTRUCTMATCH EXISTING CROSS SLOPE56.0' SEAL & COVER41.0' SEAL & COVERQUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGGEOTEXTILECOVERPLANTMIXCR. AGG.COURSESPECIALBORROWASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AGG. TREAT.AREA square feet38.8058.4109.5square yards PER STATION107832338112991405.60cubic yards PER STATION143.7216.3405.6tons PER STATION16.071.92tons PER STATION277gals. PER STATION161.7square yards PER STATION1078* BASED ON 3 APPLICATIONS 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE6:1 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWSEPARATION GEOTEXTILE12.0'TRAVEL LANE1.0'SHLD.SAWCUT LINEPROFILE GRADE=EXISTING GRADENOTE:USE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUTS TO CONSTRUCT MEDIANSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 5N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP002.DWG 25 N. 19THTYPICAL SECTION NO. 547+09.45TO47+31.86TYP. NO. 547+31.86TO49+34.62INTERSECTION DETAILVARIES*MILL/OVERLAYVARIES*3.7'TYPE "A"MED. CURB &CONC. CAPVARIES*5.0'NEWSIDEWALK 0.20' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TURN LANESTRIPEDGOREVARIES**12.0'TURN LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE4.0'SHLD.NEWC.&G.MILL/OVERLAYVARIES*EXISTING C.&G.AND WALK4.0'SHLD.1.0'SHLD.MATCH EXISTING CROSS SLOPE20.5'FULL RECONSTRUCT4.0'FULL RECONSTRUCT29.0' SEAL & COVER56.0' SEAL & COVER1.0'SHLD.QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGGEOTEXTILECOVERPLANTMIXCR. AGG.COURSESPECIALBORROWASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AGG. TREAT.AREA square feet32.1239.291.5square yards PER STATION89226775442991338.9cubic yards PER STATION119145.2338.9tons PER STATION13.311.59tons PER STATION229.4gals. PER STATION133.9square yards PER STATION892* BASED ON 3 APPLICATIONS6:1SAWCUT LINEPROFILE GRADE=EXISTING GRADE 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWSEPARATION GEOTEXTILE12.0'TRAVEL LANENOTE:USE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUTS TO CONSTRUCT MEDIANSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 6N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP002.DWG 26 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 6MAINLINE49+34.62TO59+44.0759+44.07TO60+27.24TRANS. TYP. NO. 6 TO TYP. NO. 7QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet17.27square yards PER STATION967976976cubic yards PER STATION64.0tons PER STATION6.661.73tons PER STATION123.4gals. PER STATION49square yards PER STATION967* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 7MAINLINE60+27.24TO63+00.00THEN TO TYP. NO. 8QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet17.27square yards PER STATION967976976cubic yards PER STATION64.0tons PER STATION6.661.73tons PER STATION123.4gals. PER STATION49square yards PER STATION967* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION47.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING46.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING33.0'54.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER8.0'SHLD8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE11.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANEVARIESTURN LANE40.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING53.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING31.0'56.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.8.0'SHLD11.0'TRAVEL LANE11.0'TRAVEL LANE11.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TURN LANE8.0'SHLD12.0'TURN LANE℄33.4'54.4'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACK℄31.4'56.4'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACKEX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:14.0'RAISEDMEDIAN1.0'1.0'VARIESRAISEDMEDIAN1.0'1.0'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 7N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 27 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 8MAINLINE63+00.00TO79+77.0079+77.00TO81+58.00TRANS. TYP. NO. 8 TO TYP. NO. 9QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet15.07square yards PER STATION844853853cubic yards PER STATION55.8tons PER STATION5.811.51tons PER STATION107.6gals. PER STATION43square yards PER STATION844* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 9MAINLINE81+58.00TO84+34.7284+34.72TO87+43.77TRANS. TYP. NO. 9 TO TYP. NO. 10QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet13.07square yards PER STATION733742742cubic yards PER STATION48.4tons PER STATION5.041.31tons PER STATION93.3gals. PER STATION37square yards PER STATION733* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION41.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING41.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING33.0'43.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLDVARIESTURN LANE0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄33.4'43.4'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACK41.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING41.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING33.0'33.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD14.0'RAISED MEDIAN0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄33.4'33.4'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACKEX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:11.0'1.0'VARIESRAISEDMEDIAN1.0'1.0'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 8N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 28 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 10MAINLINE87+43.7790+26.53BK.=150+26.53AH.EQUATIONTO160+40.00160+40.00TO161+40.82TRANS. TYP. NO. 10 TO TYP. NO. 11168+80.00TO172+63.60172+63.60TO174+25.15TRANS. TYP. NO. 10 TO TYP. NO. 13QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet15.87square yards PER STATION867898898cubic yards PER STATION58.8tons PER STATION6.121.55tons PER STATION113.3gals. PER STATION45square yards PER STATION867* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 11MAINLINE161+40.82TO164+60.00THEN TO TYP. NO. 12QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet18.27square yards PER STATION10001,0311,031cubic yards PER STATION67.7tons PER STATION7.051.79tons PER STATION130.5gals. PER STATION52square yards PER STATION1000* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION40.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING52.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING39.0'51.0'92.8'8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD14.0'MEDIAN - VARIES0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.12.0'TRAVEL LANESEAL & COVERSEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING & TACK℄40.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING40.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING39.0'39.0'80.8'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING & TACK8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD14.0'MEDIAN - VARIES0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄EX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:1EX 6:1SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 9N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG #### 29 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 12MAINLINE164+60.00TO167+14.92167+14.92TO168+80.00TRANS. TYP. NO. 12 TO TYP. NO. 10QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet18.27square yards PER STATION10001,0311,031cubic yards PER STATION67.7tons PER STATION7.051.79tons PER STATION130.5gals. PER STATION52square yards PER STATION1000* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 13MAINLINE174+25.15TO177+71.58THEN TO TYP. NO. 14QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet17.20square yards PER STATION956956956cubic yards PER STATION63.7tons PER STATION6.631.71tons PER STATION122.8gals. PER STATION48square yards PER STATION956* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION37.0'49.0'86.0'7.2'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE7.2'SHLD14.0'MEDIAN - VARIES12.0'TRAVEL LANESEAL & COVERSEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING & TACK0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄37.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING49.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING52.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING40.4'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING51.0'39.0'92.8'8.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE8.0'SHLD14.0'MEDIAN - VARIES0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.12.0'TRAVEL LANESEAL & COVERSEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING & TACK℄EX 6:1EX 6:1SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 10N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 30 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 14MAINLINE177+71.58TO182+28.80182+28.80TO183+99.36TRANS. TYP. NO. 14 TO TYP. NO. 15QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet17.20square yards PER STATION956956956cubic yards PER STATION63.7tons PER STATION6.631.71tons PER STATION122.8gals. PER STATION48square yards PER STATION956* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 15MAINLINE183+99.36TO204+43.52204+43.52TO205+21.77TRANS. TYP. NO. 15 TO TYP. NO. 16QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet14.80square yards PER STATION822822822cubic yards PER STATION54.8tons PER STATION5.701.47tons PER STATION105.6gals. PER STATION41square yards PER STATION822* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION37.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING37.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING37.0'37.0'74.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING & TACK7.2'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE7.2'SHLD14.0'MEDIAN - VARIES0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.12.0'TRAVEL LANE℄49.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING37.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING49.0'37.0'86.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING & TACK7.2'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE7.2'SHLD14.0'MEDIAN - VARIES0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.12.0'TRAVEL LANE℄SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 11N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 31 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 16MAINLINE205+21.77TO206+08.77206+08.77TO207+46.00TRANS. TYP. NO. 16 TO TYP. NO. 17215+98.00TO218+10.37THEN TO TYP. NO. 18QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet16.00square yards PER STATION889889889cubic yards PER STATION59.3tons PER STATION6.171.59tons PER STATION114.3gals. PER STATION44square yards PER STATION889* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 17MAINLINE207+46.00TO214+61.00214+61.00TO215+98.00TRANS. TYP. NO. 17 TO TYP. NO. 16QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet13.20square yards PER STATION733733733cubic yards PER STATION48.9tons PER STATION5.091.31tons PER STATION94.3gals. PER STATION37square yards PER STATION733* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION43.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING43.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING33.0'33.0'COLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVER9.0'PARKING12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE9.0'PARKING21.0'RAISED MEDIAN0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄43.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING43.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING33.0'47.0'COLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVER9.0'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE9.0'SHLD14.0'TURN LANE0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.12.0'TRAVEL LANE℄7.0'RAISEDMEDIANSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 12N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 32 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 18MAINLINE218+10.37TO219+40.00219+40.00TO219+98.00TRANS. TYP. NO. 18 TO TYP. NO. 19QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet11.20square yards PER STATION622622622cubic yards PER STATION41.5tons PER STATION4.321.11tons PER STATION80.0gals. PER STATION31square yards PER STATION622* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 19MAINLINE219+98.00TO223+86.37223+86.37TO224+81.37TRANS. TYP. NO. 19 TO TYP. NO. 20QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet11.20square yards PER STATION644622622cubic yards PER STATION41.5tons PER STATION4.321.15tons PER STATION80.0gals. PER STATION31square yards PER STATION644* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION31.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING31.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING35.0'21.0'COLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVERCOLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVER10.5'TRAVEL LANE10.5'TRAVEL LANE10.5'TRAVEL LANE10.5'TRAVEL LANE14.0'TURN LANE0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄31.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING31.5'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING22.0'36.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER10.5'TRAVEL LANE10.5'TRAVEL LANE10.5'TRAVEL LANE10.5'TRAVEL LANE14.0'TURN LANE0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄21.0'35.0'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACK7.0'RAISEDMEDIAN5.0'RAISEDMEDIAN1.0'1.0'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 13N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 33 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 20MAINLINE224+81.37ONLY224+81.37TO225+98.07TRANS. TYP. NO. 20 TO TYP. NO. 21QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet11.20square yards PER STATION644622622cubic yards PER STATION41.5tons PER STATION4.321.15tons PER STATION80.0gals. PER STATION31square yards PER STATION644* BASED ON 1 APPLICATIONTYPICAL SECTION NO. 21MAINLINE225+98.07ONLY225+98.07TO226+99.10TRANS. TYP. NO. 21 TO TYP. NO. 22QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet15.90square yards PER STATION906883883cubic yards PER STATION58.9tons PER STATION6.131.62tons PER STATION113.5gals. PER STATION44square yards PER STATION906* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION25.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING37.0'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING23.0'35.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER11.0'TRAVEL LANE11.0'TRAVEL LANE23.0'TRAVEL LANE11.0'TRAVEL LANE4.0'RAISEDMEDIAN℄22.0'34.0'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACK0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.38.3'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING46.8'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING30.5'51.0'COLD MILLING, TACK, SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER14.0'TRAVEL LANE13.0'TRAVEL LANE11.5'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE3.5'RAISEDMEDIAN0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄29.5'50.0'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACK14.5'TRAVEL LANE3.7'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE1.0'1.0'1.0'1.0'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 14N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 34 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 22MAINLINE226+99.10TO229+04.15QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGCOVERPLANTMIXASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AREA square feet17.60square yards PER STATION1000978978cubic yards PER STATION65.2tons PER STATION6.791.79tons PER STATION125.7gals. PER STATION49square yards PER STATION1000* BASED ON 1 APPLICATION45.8'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING47.8'CROSS SLOPE = MATCH EXISTING38.0'52.0'SEAL & COVERSEAL & COVER17.0'TRAVEL LANE15.5'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE3.5'RAISEDMEDIAN0.20' COLD MILLING0.20' PL. MIX BIT. SURF.℄37.0'51.0'COLD MILLING & TACKCOLD MILLING & TACK15.0'TRAVEL LANE5.7'SHLD12.0'TRAVEL LANE1.0'1.0'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 15N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP001.DWG 06/04/24 35 5.0'EAST VALLEY CENTERTYPICAL SECTION NO. 23 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWQUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGGEOTEXTILECOVERPLANTMIXCR. AGG.COURSESPECIALBORROWASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AGG. TREAT.AREA square feet4.3613.0821.80square yards PER STATION121363121121.1cubic yards PER STATION16.1048.480.7tons PER STATION1.800.22tons PER STATION31.0gals. PER STATION18.2square yards PER STATION121* BASED ON 3 APPLICATIONS52+00.00TO53+17.50TYP. NO. 2353+17.50TO54+17.50TRANS. TYP. NO. 23 TO TYP. NO. 24NEW C&GMED. W/CONC. CAP15.5'NEWC.&G.NEWC.&G.12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANEVARIES*31.5'FULL RECONSTRUCT12.0'TURN LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE39.0' SEAL & COVER27.0' SEAL & COVERSEPARATION GEOTEXTILE 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWSEPARATION GEOTEXTILEEAST VALLEY CENTERTYPICAL SECTION NO. 23QUANTITIESUNITAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALCOLDMILLINGGEOTEXTILECOVERPLANTMIXCR. AGG.COURSESPECIALBORROWASPHALTCEMENTEMULSIFIEDASPHALTSEALEMULSIFIEDASPHALTTACK*AGG. TREAT.AREA square feet9.2027.60square yards PER STATION256767256255.6cubic yards PER STATION34.1102.2tons PER STATION3.810.46tons PER STATION65.7gals. PER STATION38.4square yards PER STATION256* BASED ON 3 APPLICATIONS54+17.50TO57+42.90TYP. NO. 24VARIES*6.0' 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWNEW C&GMED. W/CONC. CAPVARIES*NEWC.&G.NEWC.&G.12.0'TURN LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'TRAVEL LANE12.0'THRU./TURN LANE41.5'FULL RECONSTRUCT12.0'TURN LANE12.0'TURN LANE39.0' SEAL & COVER39.0' SEAL & COVERSEPARATION GEOTEXTILE 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWSEPARATION GEOTEXTILENOTE:USE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUTS TO CONSTRUCT MEDIANSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY TYPICAL SECTIONS FOR UTILITY PIH 16N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:18 AM 9478000UTTYP002.DWG 36 160+00 170+00 ST 170+44 . 5 5 CS 168+94.5 5 Mid 164+49.74WV MH MH MH MH MHWVSDDI SD STA 169+14, 44' LTSEWER MHSTA 171+21, 41' LTSEWER MHSTA 173+62, 43' LTSEWER MHSTA 164+82, 66' LTWATER VALVETSCHACHE LN N 19TH AVE180+00 28+83.28 STPU 1201(4) =177+17.57 AR 94111180+00 190+00 PI 177+71.58WVWVWV MH MH FHWV SDDIFHWVBBBDIMHPBSTA 178+31, 37' LTSEWER MHW OAK ST N 19TH AVET. #####R. ##### SEC. ## T. #####R. ##### SEC. ##SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 17N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 1:42 PM 9478000UTPLN001.DWG #### 37 200+00 2+39.34PC STPU 1201(4) 35+83.14 M-1201(3) = 1+19.33 STPU 1201(4) 4+89.34PT STPU 1201(4) 5+34.21PC STPU 1201(4) 8+09.63PT STPU 1201(4) 190+00 200+00 PC 198+45.23 PC 201+65.52 PT 201+20.65 PT 204+15.52 Mid 199+82.94 Mid 202+90.52 WV WV WV MH MH FHWV FHWV PBSTA 204+49, 23' RTSEWER MHSTA 204+80, 40' LTWATER VALVESTA 204+67, 27' RTWATER VALVESTA 204+83, 37' RTWATER VALVEDURSTON RDN 19TH AVESTA 204+87, 59' LTWATER VALVESTA 204+87, 67' RTWATER VALVE220+00 35+83.14 M-1201(3) =1+19.33 STPU 1201(4)210+00 220+00 WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV WV MH MH MH MHTEL MHTEL WV FHFH WV WVSTA 208+58, 24' RTSEWER MHSTA 208+59, 28' LTTELEPHONE MHSTA 212+69, 26' RTSEWER MHSTA 216+71, 33' RTSEWER MHSTA 216+97, 25' LTTELEPHONE MHSTA 217+46, 31' RTWATER VALVESTA 211+27, 40' RTWATER VALVESTA 211+17, 38' LTWATER VALVEBEALL STN 19TH AVET. #####R. ##### SEC. ## T. #####R. ##### SEC. ##SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 18N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 1:42 PM 9478000UTPLN001.DWG 38 231+16 220+00 13+19.60PC M-1201(3) 18+21.30PTM-1201(3)220+00 230+00 231+16 EP 231+15.67 PC 228+15.67 PC 222+97.37 PT 227+99.07 Mid 229+65.67 Mid 225+48.22 WV WV WV WV WV WVWV MH MH MH MH MH MH TEL WV WVWHSTA 225+78, 23' RTTELEPHONE MHSTA 228+76, 42' RTWATER VALVESTA 227+10, 18' RTWATER VALVEMAIN STN 19TH AVESTA 227+39, 78' LTWATER VALVET. #####R. ##### SEC. ##SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 19N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 1:42 PM 9478000UTPLN001.DWG 39 EB I-90 ON RAMPEB I-90 OFF RAMP19TH AVE R = 7 3.8'R=96.0'TS 43+12.50S18° 05' 01.02"W EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 42+73.71OFF: 40.71' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 42+56.94OFF: 122.48' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 42+56.21OFF: 172.92' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 42+72.36OFF: 167.37' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 42+79.92OFF: 164.77' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 41+77.09OFF: 78.85' RT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 42+19.22OFF: 77.42' RT.MAINLINE STA. 43+21.21END INTERSECTION DETAILBEGIN TYPICAL SECTIONMAINLINE STA. 41+31.43END TYPICAL SECTIONBEGIN INTERSECTION DETAILPPPPSCPBPBPBPBPBFOFOFOFOFOGASGASGASGASGAS 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWFULL RECONSTRUCTPAVEMENT SECTION SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE 0.50' MILL AND OVERLAYMILL & OVERLAYPAVEMENT SECTIONNOTES:1.MATCH EXISTING CROSS SLOPES THROUGH INTERSECTION2.SAWCUT LIMITS SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR INFIELD PRIOR TO STARTING WORK3.SEE ADA DETAIL SHEETS FOR CURB RAMP INFORMATION4.MATCH EXISTING EDGES OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWNMILL AND OVERLAYFULL PAVEMENTRECONSTRUCTIONSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY INTERSECTION DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 20N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:31 AM 9478000UTPLN002.DWG T. 01 S.R. 05 E.SEC. 2640 PI = 48+59.77Δ= 13° 50' 13"(LT.)R = 3,274'T = 397.27'L = 790.68'E = 24.01'57+0057+00 58+0 0 PCC 57+18.91 EP 5 8 + 0 7 . 7 1 EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+93.13OFF: 85.91' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+37.80OFF: 83.47' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+40.24OFF: 38.16' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+18.26OFF: 58.28' RT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 47+77.56OFF: 102.45' RT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+04.81OFF: 109.88' RT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+73.40OFF: 90.14' RT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+52.99OFF: 86.72' RT.MAINLINE STA. 47+31.86END TYPICAL SECTIONBEGIN INTERSECTION DETAILEDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+36.87OFF: 100.42' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+18.63OFF: 98.54' LT.EDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 47+59.94OFF: 34.64' LT.MAINLINE STA. 49+34.62END INTERSECTION DETAILBEGIN TYPICAL SECTION19TH AVE EAST VALLEY CENTEREDGE OF PAVEMENTSTA: 48+57.73OFF: 68.47' RT.PBFPFPPBPBPBPBPBFPSCPBPBPBPBFOPWRPWRPWRPWR FOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO FOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO GASGASGASPWR PWR PWRPWRPWR PPFPFPPBFPFPPBPBPBPBPBFPSCPBPBPBPBPBPBWVFO FO FO FO FOFO PWRPWRPWR PWR FOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFOFOFO FO FO FO GASGASGASPWRPWR PWR PWRPWRPWR GASGASGASFOFOFOFOGASFOFOGASGASFOFO FO GASGASFO FO FO FO FOW W W 0.50' PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1.20' CRUSHED AGGREGATE COURSE 2.00' SPECIAL BORROWFULL RECONSTRUCTPAVEMENT SECTION SEPARATION GEOTEXTILE 0.50' MILL AND OVERLAYMILL & OVERLAYPAVEMENT SECTIONNOTES:1.MATCH EXISTING CROSS SLOPES THROUGH INTERSECTION2.SAWCUT LIMITS SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR INFIELD PRIOR TO STARTING WORK3.SEE ADA DETAIL SHEETS FOR CURB RAMP INFORMATION4.MATCH EXISTING EDGES OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWNMILL AND OVERLAYFULL PAVEMENTRECONSTRUCTIONSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY INTERSECTION DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 21N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 8:31 AM 9478000UTPLN002.DWG T. 01 S.R. 05 E.SEC. 2641 TS 43+12.50 SC 44+62.50 PB FP PB PB PB FP SC PB PB PB PB PW R FO FO FOFOFO FO FOFOGAS PWR PWRPP PPPP SC PB FP PB PB PB FP SC PB PB PB PB PBPB PB PB WVFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPW RPWRFO FO FOFO FO FOFOGAS PWR PWRGASGASGASGASGASGASGASF OFOWR=9 6'R=3205'I-01I-02I-03I-04OT-04OT-03OT-02OT-01 CO-04 CO-02 CO-03 CO-01534054669.733PWRU6251 BL534064668.812PWRU6251534074670.192PWRU6251 EL JTP51006534084674.270PWRU6251 BL JTP51005534094675.712PWRU6251534104676.065PWRU6251PWR STA: 44+05.00BIOFILTRATION SWALE CHECK DAM(LEVEL SPREADER)SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 46+75.00BIOFILTRATION SWALE CHECK DAM(LEVEL SPREADER)SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 45+40.00BIOFILTRATION SWALE CHECK DAM(LEVEL SPREADER)SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 43+26.03PROTECT IN PLACE 24"CMP DRAINAGE CULVERTBIOFILTRATION SWALE-SEE DETAIL SHEET FORTYPICAL SECTIONSTA: 48+02.02PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING 24"CMP APPROACH PIPESTA: 45+25.00OFF: 4.05' LT.MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 45+75.00OFF: 5.01' LT.MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 46+75.00OFF: 6.35' LT.MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 47+25.00OFF: 6.34' LT.MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEET45+00 TS 43+12.50 SC 44+62.50 PI = 48+59.77Δ= 13° 50' 13"(LT.)R = 3,274'T = 397.27'L = 790.68'E = 24.01'SPI PI = 44+12.50Δ = 178° 41' 15"LS = 150'(LT.)S18° 05' 01.02"WEAST VALL E Y C E N T E RN. 19TH AVE.EB I-90ON RAMPSTA: 43+12.50OFF: 0.00' T.MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA 47+40, 57.0' RTSTORM XING UG FOSTA. 45+70.00 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM467046804690467046804690INLET I-01STA. 45+70.00, 49.91' LT.48" TYPE B CURB INLETGRATE EL. = 4676.20'SUMP EL. = 4671.20'12" INV. (E) OUT EL. = 4672.20'OUTFALL OT-01STA. 45+70.00, 76.48' LT.RCP FETSINV. EL. = 4671.20'PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GROUNDCO-0112" X 26.6' CTC (24.9' ETE)RCP CL. 5 @ 3.76%STA. 46+05.00 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM467046804690467046804690PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GROUNDCO-0212" X 24.8' CTC (23.1' ETE)RCP CL. 5 @ 2.02%OUTFALL OT-02STA. 46+05.00, 75.39' LT.RCP FETSINV. EL. = 4671.37'INLET I-02STA. 46+05.00, 50.59' LT.48" TYPE B CURB INLETGRATE EL. = 4675.87'SUMP EL. = 4670.87'12" INV. (E) OUT EL. = 4671.87'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY N. 19TH AVE STORM DRAIN DETAIL SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 22N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/18/2024 1:25 PM 9478000UTHYPLN1.DWG 42 CHECK DAM (LEVEL SPREADER) DETAIL - PROFILE VIEW4:1CHECK DAM (LEVEL SPREADER) DETAIL - SECTION VIEW *SECTION VIEW TAKEN IN CENTER OF CHECK DAM LOOKING UPSTREAMNO SCALECHECK DAM NOTES:*EXTEND TRAPEZOIDAL FLOW CHANNEL SECTION VIEW FOR THE ENTIRELENGTH OF THE TRM INSTALLATION ALONG CHECK DAM TO THEBIOFILTRATION SWALE INVERT.**DIMENSION IS 1.0' FOR CHECK DAMS LOCATED ALONG EAST VALLEY CENTER.1)PROVIDE SYNTHETIC FIBER MATRIX TURF REINFORCED MAT (TRM).2)TRM QUANTITY IS BASED ON THE TRM SECTION VIEW WIDTH IDENTIFIED INTHE DETAIL AND BURIED TRM WIDTH FOR PERIMETER ANCHOR TRENCHES INACCORDANCE WITH DTL. DWG. NO. 610-05.3)FURNISH AND INSTALL TURF REINFORCED MAT IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTION 610, DTL. DWG. NO. 610-05, ANDMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.4)CRUSHED STONE FOR CHECK DAM (LEVEL SPREADER) CORES TO BEMATERIAL MEETING THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS RIPRAP AND ANCILLARYARMOR PER SECTION 701 OF MDT'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPTTHAT THAT GRADATIONS SHALL BE AS IDENTIFIED IN THE TABLE TO THERIGHT. PLACE AND COMPACT CRUSHED STONE TO 95% RELATIVECOMPACTION. CRUSHED STONE FOR CHECK DAMS TO BE PAID FOR AS DRAINAGGREGATE.TOP OF CHECK DAM ANDREFERENCE STATION2.9'2.0'3.1'4.0'TRM INITIAL ANCHOR TRENCHTURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM)TERMINAL ANCHOR TRENCHTRMDRAINAGEDRAINAGETOP OF CHECK DAMAND REFERENCESTATION8.0'2.0' **3.0'1.0'2.0' **3.0'1.0'TRM LONGITUDINALANCHOR TRENCHTRM LONGITUDINALANCHOR TRENCHTRM4:14:1NO SLOPENO SLOPE4:1SLOPE VARIES -MATCH EXISTINGBIOFILTRATION SWALEINVERT = BIOFILTRATIONBIOSWALE PROFILE GRADEBIOFILTRATIONSWALE SECTIONROADWAYFORESLOPEBIOFILTRATION SWALEINVERT = BIOFILTRATIONSWALE PROFILE GRADE~~CRUSHED STONE -SEE NOTES0.75' 0.75'CRUSHED STONE -SEE NOTESCOMPACTEDEMBANKMENTMATERIALCOMPACTEDEMBANKMENTMATERIAL~SIEVE DESIGNATION12-INCH6-INCH3-INCH1-INCHNO. 4PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING SQUARE MESH SIEVE100%84% - 100%68% - 83%42% - 55%8% - 12%GRADATION FOR STONE FOR CHECK DAMS (LEVEL SPREADER) CORE~KEY CRUSHEDSTONE INTOSIDE SLOPEKEY CRUSHEDSTONE INTOSIDE SLOPE4:1BIOFILTRATION SWALE TYPICAL SECTION4:1MATCH EXISTINGBIOFILTRATION SWALEINVERT = BIOFILTRATIONSWALE PROFILE GRADE8.0'4:1ROADWAYFORESLOPEDEPTH VARIES 1' MIN. #BIOFILTRATION SWALE NOTES:#SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR DETAILS.##PLACE 6" OF LIGHTLY COMPACTED ONSITE TOPSOIL ALONG EXTIRE BIOFILTRATION SWALE INVERT, EXCEPT FOR AT CHECK DAMS.0.50' ##STATION44+05.0045+40.0046+75.0052+80.0053+75.00CHECK DAM CREST ELEVATION4671.144671.804672.464669.774670.26CHECK DAM LOCATIONSDESCRIPTIONN. 19TH AVE.N. 19TH AVE.N. 19TH AVE.EAST VALLEY CENTEREAST VALLEY CENTER2.0'BIOFILTRATION SWALEBACKSLOPENO SCALENO SCALESTA. 47+40.00 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM467046804690467046804690PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GROUNDCO-0312" X 19.7' CTC (18.0' ETE)RCP CL. 5 @ 2.44%INLET I-03STA. 47+40.00, 41.99' LT.48" TYPE B CURB INLETGRATE EL. = 4675.26'SUMP EL. = 4671.51'12" INV. (E) OUT EL. = 4672.51'OUTFALL OT-03STA. 47+40.00, 61.70' LT.RCP FETSINV. EL. = 4672.03'STA. 47+75.00 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM467046804690467046804690PROPOSED GRADEEXISTING GROUNDCO-0412" X 18.0' CTC (16.3' ETE)RCP CL. 5 @ 1.39%INLET I-04STA. 47+75.00, 42.83' LT.48" TYPE B CURB INLETGRATE EL. = 4674.97'SUMP EL. = 4671.44'12" INV. (E) OUT EL. = 4672.44'OUTFALL OT-04STA. 47+75.00, 60.84' LT.RCP FETSINV. EL. = 4672.19'SHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY HYDRAULIC DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 23N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/18/2024 1:25 PM 9478000UTHYPLN1.DWG 43 PB FP FP P B P B PBP B PB FP SC PBPBPBPBPWR PWRFOFOFO FO FOFOFO FOGAS PWRPWR P P FP P PFP FP PPPPPPPPFPFPFPFP PB FP FP P B P B PBP B PB FP SC PBPBPBPB521374666.491EDGEWAT BOB TC PBPBPBFP PB PB WVPWRPWR PWRPWRPWRFOFOFOFOPWRPWRPWRFOFO FOPWRPWR FOFOFOFOFO FO FOGAS PWRPWR FOFOGAS GAS FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOGASGASGASGASGASGASGASFOFOFOFOFOFO GASFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPWRPWRPWRFOFOFOPWRGASPWRPWRGASGASGASGASGASGASFOW STA: 52+80.00BIOFILTRATION SWALE CHECK DAM(LEVEL SPREADER)SEE DETAIL SHEETBIOFILTRATION SWALE -SEE DETAIL SHEET FORTYPICAL SECTIONSTA: 52+90.00OFF: 0.00 'MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 53+90.00OFF: 0.00 'MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 54+90.00OFF: 0.00 'MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEETSTA: 53+75.00BIOFILTRATION SWALE CHECK DAM(LEVEL SPREADER)SEE DETAIL SHEET52+0053+0054+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 52+0053+0054+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 PCC 53+52.42 PCC 57+18 . 9 1 EP 58+07. 7 1 N. 19TH AVE.EAST VALLEY CENTERSTA 52+80, 55.6' LT.STORM XING UG FOSTA: 52+80.03OFF: 55.60' LT.MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE DETAIL SHEET STA 53+75, 58.4' LT.STORM XING UG FOSTA 53+00 TO STA 54+67,UG FO LTSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY EAST VALLEY CENTER STORM DRAIN DETAIL SHEET FOR UTILITY PIH 24N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/18/2024 1:25 PM 9478000UTHYPLN1.DWG 44 PBSCPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRTELTELFOFOFOFO PWR-OH6.0'3.7'2.0'1.23%7.46%7.54%FRONT OF GUTTERHIGH POINT2.0'2.9'7.92%7.13%5.0'5.6'7.4'5.3'8.0'5.2'4.9'5.0'5.0'5.0'13.9'4.9'14.4'4.8'4.8'4.9'5.0'2.0'2.0'2.1'2.0'8.7'5.0'5.0'9.7'1.7'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKMATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKTRANSITION PANELTRANSITIONPANELEXIST. SIGNALCABINET DO NOTDISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBNEAT CUT EXIST.OF ASPHALTRELOCATE PEDESTRIANSIGNAL AND PUSH BUTTONN. 19TH AVE.W. OAK ST.LANDINGRAMPLANDINGRAMP5.20%0.50%0.50%1.50%0.78%2.88%0.50%1.50%0.50%7.10%1.49%1.88%0.77%1.18%1.50%0.02%1.29%2.54% 2.36%0.00%0.50%5.20%1.50%0.50%7.10%1.50%2.07%0.50%1.23%1.00%1.50%1.40%0.50%TBC RADIUS = 45.5'STA:178+35.44OFF:84.19'RTBEGIN TBC 45.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:177+90.18OFF:79.51'RTEND TBC 45.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:178+32.51OFF:38.79'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+97.41OFF:59.22'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+01.17OFF:54.26'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+17.94OFF:42.19'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+23.40OFF:40.31'RTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:177+88.19OFF:79.31'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:178+15.91OFF:40.89'RTPBPBPBPBFPPWRGAS GA SGASPWRPWRPWRPWR TELTELTELTELFOFOFOFOTELTEL TEL FOFOFOFO FOFOFOTEL2.0'5. 5 7%0.67%1.78%2.0'1.38%1.5'2.0'2.0'3.1 2 % 1.2 5 % 4.92 % 5. 7 ' 3.3'5.0'6.0'3.1 '10.5'5.4'3.0' 5. 8 ' 5. 1 '6.3'4.9'2.0 '2.0'2.0'2.0'5.1'6.6'6.6'6.9'8.0 ' 3.0' 3.5' 5.3' 5.0'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALK3" CURBBETWEEN FLARESMATCH EXIST. SUPTRANSITION PANELNEW 4" RETAININGCURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBNEAT CUT EXIST.ASPHALTRELOCATE PEDESTRIANSIGNAL AND PUSH BUTTONW. OAK ST.TRANSITIONPANELRAMPL AN D ING RAMPLANDIN G RA M P N. 19TH AVE. 0.70%0.50%5.00%5.00%1.50%1.30%1.10%1.50%1.10%0. 5 1% 0.51%4.02%4.02% 6.3 3 % 0. 5 9% 3.60 % 1.6 9 % 6.96 % 1.46% 1.17 %1.50%FRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:177+36.62OFF:73.34'RTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:177+25.93OFF:57.83'RTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:176+95.69OFF:49.02'RTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:176+95.68OFF:50.23'RTBEGIN TBC 29.5' RADIUSSTA:177+04.26OFF:51.04'RTEND TBC 29.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 49.5' RADIUSSTA:177+25.52OFF:60.26'RTEND TBC 49.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:177+34.80OFF:74.16'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+24.04OFF:58.80'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+28.91OFF:64.24'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+12.15OFF:52.17'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+05.30OFF:51.07'RTTBC RADIUS = 29.5'STA:177+04.10OFF:80.54'RTTBC RADIUS = 49.5'STA:176+89.58OFF:94.29'RTNO SCALESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY FPRPIH 25N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - W. OAK STSOUTHWEST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - W. OAK STNORTHWEST CORNERN. 19TH AVE & W. OAK STCURB RAMPDETAILSDETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.45 PBTPTPFPPBPBFHWVGASTEL PWRTELTELTELTELTELTELTELFOFOFOFOFO2.0'5.0'2.0'5.0'5.0'9.5'7.96%8.23%1.38%7.67%7.26%1.3'2.7'6.1'4.6'6.8'5.0'8.6'17.6'6.4'7.7'6.6'5.2'2.0'2.0'2.0'2.1'5.0'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALK5" CURBBETWEEN FLARESEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBNEAT CUT EXIST.ASPHALTEXIST. STORMDRAINDO NOT DISTURBW. OAK ST.N. 19TH AVE.TRANSITIONPANELRAMPRAMP LANDING0.25%1.50%0.64%1.50%0.89%7.00%1.00%0.50%0.78%1.89%0.90%2.03%0.99%5.00%7.00%0.89%1.50%5.00%1.32%1.56%FRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:177+24.72OFF:66.89'LTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:177+21.25OFF:57.61'LTFRONT OF GUTTERLOW POINTSTA:176+92.76OFF:39.85'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:176+97.53OFF:43.11'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+02.36OFF:44.96'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+12.72OFF:51.47'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:177+16.77OFF:55.35'LTEND TBC 17.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:177+22.73OFF:67.10'LTBEGIN TBC 44.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:176+92.39OFF:41.81'LTEND TBC 44.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 17.5' RADIUSSTA:177+19.09OFF:58.06'LTTBC RADIUS = 17.5'STA:177+05.32OFF:68.86'LTTBC RADIUS = 44.5'STA:176+84.30OFF:85.54'LTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:177+11.83OFF:48.22'LTSDDIFHWVBBBPBDIMHPWR-OH PW R PW R PWRPWRPWR-OHPWR-OHPWR-OH7.7'5.0'2.0'7.5' 3.0' 7.9'4.5'9.9'1.01 % 8.90% 8.30 % 8.1 0 % 5.5' 7.4' 2. 5 '12.4'4.7' 6.2 ' 7. 6 '4.8'4.7'4.5'5.2'3.0 ' 5.0'9.5'2.0'8.0'11.4'5.4'5. 0 '2.0'2.0 '2.0'5.7'2.3'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKMATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADEEXIST. MANHOLEDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. STORMDRAINDO NOT DISTURBNEAT CUT EXIST.ASPHALTEXIST. PED. PUSHBUTTON AND SIGNAL -RELOCATEW. OAK ST.TRANSITIONPANELTRANSITION PANEL RAMPLANDINGRAMPLANDINGN. 19TH AVE.5.25%0.50%1. 0 1 %0.50%0.47%1.07 %0.80%0.50%0.03% 0.23% 0.18% 1.9 7 %6.40%1.00%0.50%1.05%1.01%5.25%6.40%0.95% 2. 5 0% 1.0 3 % 1.4 0 %0.9 5% 0.9 5 % 0.9 5 %1.00%0.9 8 % 4.79%0.9 9%TBC RADIUS = 29.5'STA:178+46.78OFF:80.74'LTTBC RADIUS = 47.5'STA:178+62.05OFF:90.27'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+41.87OFF:51.65'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+37.03OFF:52.90'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+26.17OFF:59.63'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:178+22.90OFF:63.42'LTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:178+53.30OFF:49.22'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:178+15.12OFF:74.51'LTTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:178+53.30OFF:51.22'LTBEGIN TBC 47.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:178+17.02OFF:75.14'LTEND TBC 29.5' RADIUSSTA:178+47.29OFF:51.24'LTEND TBC 47.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 29.5' RADIUSSTA:178+21.75OFF:65.12'LTNO SCALENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 26N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - W. OAK STNORTHEAST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - W. OAK STSOUTHEAST CORNERN. 19TH AVE & W. OAK STCURB RAMPDETAILS46 PB50397BND50398BND50399BND50400BND50401BND50402BND50403BND50404BND50405BND50406BND50407BND50408BND50409BND50410BND50411BND50412BND50413BND50414BND50415BND50416BNDPWRPWRPWR2.0'4.21%7.20%1.54%6.94%8.29%2.0'9.7'9.0'8.7'9.1'6.0'2.0'5.0 '2.0'7.8'5.2'9.7'5.0'5.0'5.0'5.2'6.5'10.1'9.2'8.6'8.0'2.2'11.4'11.5'9.0'3.6'5.7'6.2'14.8'9.7'3.5'10.5'5.0'MATCH EXIST.SUPMATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADELANDINGRAMPRAMPN. 19TH AVE.TRANSITIONPANELTRANSITIONPANELRAMPLANDINGTSCHACHE LN.1.46%3.70%2.77%1.46%3.43%3.70%2.77%1.46%1.46%0.00%1.40%0.01%7.10%7.00%1.40%1.33%1.26%1.25%1.00%3.48%1.73%2.03%1.50%0.20%1.40%1.40%7.10%7.00%1.46%FRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:164+80.59OFF:91.85'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:164+84.29OFF:72.38'RTTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:164+82.70OFF:92.06'RTBEGIN TBC 40.5' RADIUSSTA:164+83.68OFF:83.33'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+86.71OFF:71.99'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+89.00OFF:67.50'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:165+04.21OFF:52.44'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:165+08.74OFF:50.03'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:165+07.99OFF:48.16'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:165+28.13OFF:42.36'RTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:165+35.47OFF:41.27'RTEND CURB AND GUTTERSTA:165+35.77OFF:43.25'RTEND TBC 97.5' RADIUSSTA:165+32.41OFF:43.72'RTEND TBC 40.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 47.5' RADIUSSTA:165+00.94OFF:54.58'RTEND TBC 47.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 97.5' RADIUSSTA:165+15.86OFF:47.31'RTTBC RADIUS = 40.5'STA:165+26.22OFF:87.06'RTTBC RADIUS = 47.5'STA:165+30.70OFF:92.64'RTPBSC50350BND03 BND04 BND05 EL50353BND04 BND0550354BND02 BND05 EL50355BND02 SSC50356BND02 BND05 BL50357BND02 ESC EL BND01 EL50358BND04 BND0550361BND04 BND0650362BND01 BND06 ELPWRPWRGASGASPWRPWRFOFOFO2.0'3.8'2.0'0.8'8.35% 8.94 % 8.6 1 % 8. 0 6 %7.0'1 8 . 1 '13.7 '6.3'7.9' 7.7'5.1'9.7'2.0'5.2' 6.0'2.0 '5.0'13.6 ' 9. 4 '2.9'5.0'3.6'5.0'5.0'5. 9 '6.3'5. 7 ' 8.8' 5.3'5.0 'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKMATCH EXIST.SUPEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. SIGNALCABINET DO NOTDISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXPROTECT IN PLACELANDINGRAMPTRANSITIONPANELT R A N S I T I O NPANEL RAMPN. 19TH AVE.TSCHACHE LN.TSCHACHE LN.0. 5 0% 0. 5 0%0.50%6.35%0.79%0.59%0.79 %1.1 5%0.50%0.78%0.30%5.25%5.50%0.50%0.78%5.50%5.50%0.66%5.0 1%1.88%0.2 7 % 0.9 4 %1.50%FRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:164+80.59OFF:91.85'RTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:164+39.88OFF:124.42'RTEND TBC 94.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:164+37.72OFF:124.31'RTTBC RADIUS = 30.5'STA:163+93.88OFF:82.22'RTFRONT OF GUTTERHIGH POINTSTA:164+08.65OFF:52.97'RTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:163+94.11OFF:49.43'RTTBC RAMPLAYDOWNSTA:164+08.61OFF:55.18'RTTBC RAMPLAYDOWNSTA:164+13.06OFF:57.87'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+25.67OFF:73.57'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+22.66OFF:68.57'RTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:163+93.82OFF:51.41'RTEND TBC 30.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 94.5' RADIUSSTA:164+20.52OFF:65.40'RTBEGIN TBC 30.5' RADIUSSTA:163+98.31OFF:52.02'RTTBC RADIUS = 94.5'STA:163+36.10OFF:116.13'RTNO SCALESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 27N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - TSCHACHE LNSOUTHWEST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - TSCHACHE LNNORTHWEST CORNERN. 19TH AVE & TSCHACHE LN.CURB RAMPDETAILSDETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.47 PBPB50599BND01 BND50602BND BND02 BL50603BND01 BND03 BL50604BND01 BND02 EL50605BND03 EL CURB SW0150611BND01 BND0250617BND0150618BND01 EL CURB SW01GASPWRFOFOFOPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRGASGASGASPWRPWRPWRPWRPWR2.0'5.0'9.4'7.82%0.67%2.5'6.92%7.71%PI = 164+61.02Δ= 31° 08' 11"R = 1,637'T = 456.08'L = 889.61'E = 62.35'11.7'4.5'5.0'11.3'5.0'4.8'6.0'4.8'9.4'8.9'6.0'6.8'6.4'2.0'5.0' 1.0' 9.0 ' 2.0'3.2'6.0'2.0'5.0'MATCH EXIST. SUPMATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKNEW 4" RETAINING CURBEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADENEAT CUT EXIST.ASPHALTLANDINGRAMPRAMP TRANSITIONPANELTSCHACHE LN.N. 19TH AVE.7.10%7.10%1.02%1.50%1.02%1.00%1.00%0.31%0.45%0.50%6.00%6.00%0.74%1.09%2.01%0.10%2.73%7.7 5%5.25%4.2 4 % 0.50%FRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:164+70.71OFF:77.58'LTTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:164+68.88OFF:78.16'LTEND TBC 24.5' RADIUSSTA:164+65.71OFF:67.24'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+62.57OFF:60.48'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+64.92OFF:64.95'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:164+26.69OFF:38.36'LTBEGIN TBC 64.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:164+26.42OFF:40.34'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+41.85OFF:44.79'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:164+47.72OFF:47.79'LTEND TBC 64.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 24.5' RADIUSSTA:164+59.30OFF:56.55'LTTBC RADIUS = 24.5'STA:164+43.29OFF:74.53'LTSDDIFPFPPBSD50546BND BND0150549BND BND0150552BND BND0150555BND BND0150560BND BL50561BND BND0150565BND EL BND0250566BND BND0250567BND BND0150568BND EL SW50570BND BND0150571BND BND02 FO FOPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRGASGASGASPWRPWRPWR2.0'1.7'8.28 % 8.0 6 % 5. 9 5 %3.0'1.50% 6.9' 2.5' 3.9 '2.7'2.0'5.0'6.0'9.6 '9.3 '2.8'5.0' 4. 6 ' 5. 0 ' 3.2' 7.2 ' 6.3'6.5'5.0'2.0'7.8 '4.2 '4.8'8.7 '4.6'5.4'3. 0 'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKMATCH EXIST.SUPEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBNEW 4"RETAINING CURBEXIST. STORMDRAIN DO NOTDISTURBEXIST. STORMMANHOLE ADJUST TOGRADE3" CURBBETWEEN FLARESRESETLANDSCAPINGBLOCKNEW 4"RETAINING CURBTRANSITIONPANELADD 10"EXTENDERS TOBOTH PPB7.8'LANDINGRAMP RAMPRAMPTRANSITIONPANEL TSCHACHE LN.N. 19TH AVE.0.30%1.68% 1.40%5.21%5.50%5.01%1. 5 0%0.36%0. 6 1%2.83%6.00%5.98%1. 5 0%1.00%1.22%3.63% 1.4 2 %3.39%0.42% 1.5 0 %4.84%0.97% 0. 7 5%4.39%4.16%TBC RADIUS = 43.5'STA:165+63.52OFF:93.99'LTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:165+63.90OFF:47.96'LTEND CURB AND GUTTERSTA:165+64.18OFF:49.94'LTEND TBC 43.5' RADIUSSTA:165+57.50OFF:50.95'LTFRONT OF GUTTERGRADE BREAKSTA:165+41.00OFF:55.05'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:165+36.60OFF:60.86'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:165+32.96OFF:64.56'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:165+28.65OFF:70.52'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:165+26.35OFF:74.91'LTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:165+23.10OFF:77.84'LTBEGIN TBC 43.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:165+22.56OFF:89.37'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:165+20.67OFF:89.18'LTTBC RADIUS = 64.5'STA:164+17.88OFF:104.23'LTNO SCALESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 28N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - TSCHACHE LNNORTHEAST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - TSCHACHE LNSOUTHEAST CORNERN. 19TH AVE & TSCHACHE LN.CURB RAMPDETAILSDETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.48 WVPBPBPWRPWRFOFO GASGASGAS GASPWRGAS FOWWW4.5'2.0'0.9'2.0'3.3'5.0'8.50%6.98%8.16%8.29%6.0'5.0'4.7'17.4'2.5'4.9'3.8'6.5'5.5'8.2'11.5'5.0'5.0'16.3'12.5'5.9'2.0'3.6 ' 6.0'2.0'6.2'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKMATCH EXIST. SUPEXIST.PULLBOXADJUSTTOGRADEEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADEEXIST.WATERVALVEDO NOTDISTURBCATTAIL ST.LANDINGRAMP RAMP N. 19TH AVE.1.19%0.62%1.47%5.00%0.46%5.75%0.54%1.00%1.23%1.50%1.50%1.35%2.56%3.29%1.90%0.47%1.50%0.76%2.46%2.46%0.76%1.09%5.00%1.50%0.54%5.75%FRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:63+39.99OFF:92.67'RTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:63+41.96OFF:93.00'RTBEGIN TBC 38.5' RADIUSSTA:63+43.81OFF:82.01'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:63+46.02OFF:69.40'RTSTA:63+39.01OFF:62.39'RTSTA:63+77.97OFF:40.97'RTEND TBC 65.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTERSTA:63+79.66OFF:46.18'RTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:63+79.04OFF:44.28'RTFRONT OF GUTTERGRADE BREAKSTA:63+66.45OFF:49.82'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+68.10OFF:51.20'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+63.01OFF:54.33'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+53.16OFF:62.66'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+50.02OFF:66.65'RTEND TBC 38.5' RADIUS/BEGINTBC 65.5' RADIUSSTA:63+56.04OFF:59.78'RTTBC RADIUS = 38.5'STA:63+81.78OFF:88.42'RTPBWVFHPW R PWR PWR PWR GAS GAS FO FOW WPWRGASFOFO 17 . 7 '5.1'5.0 ' 5.0'7.4 ' 4. 8 ' 5.2' 5.6'4.5'2.0'0.6'15 . 5 ' 2.0' 7. 72% 8.25 %4.5'2.0'0.6'7.1 ' 7. 9 7% 8.2 9 % 0. 4 4 %4.9'6. 3 '15.1'4.8'4. 5 '7.0'4.2'2.0 '5.0'5. 0 ' 7.4 '5.5'6.1'8.6'5.0'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKMATCH EXIST. SUPTRANSITION PANEL5" CURBBETWEEN FLARESEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADEEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBRAMPRAMPLANDINGTRANSITIONPANELCATTAIL ST.N. 19TH AVE. 1. 7 0%2.00%1. 3 1% 2. 3 3%1.8 6% 0.5 6 %5.00%1.50%0. 69% 0.66 %1.50%5.00%0.54%0. 5 6% 1. 4 3%0.50%0.50%0.00%2.00%0.25%0.50% 0. 6 9% 0.33 %5.25%5.00%1.24%1.50%FRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:62+77.00OFF:84.02'RTEND TBC 49.5' RADIUSEND CURB AND GUTTERSTA:62+75.17OFF:84.84'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:62+70.47OFF:73.32'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+68.21OFF:73.71'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+64.81OFF:70.00'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+56.47OFF:63.40'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+52.07OFF:60.93'RTEND TBC 98.5' RADIUS/BEGIN TBC 49.5' RADIUSSTA:62+39.42OFF:56.67'RTBEGIN TBC 98.5' RADIUSBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:62+28.24OFF:55.18'RTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:62+28.39OFF:53.18'RTTBC RADIUS = 49.5'STA:62+30.09OFF:105.28'RTTBC RADIUS: 65.5'STA:63+99.83OFF:108.50'RTTBC RADIUS = 98.5'STA:62+20.85OFF:153.40'RTNO SCALESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 29N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - CATTAIL STSOUTHWEST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - CATTAIL STNORTHWEST CORNERN. 19TH AVE & CATTAIL STCURB RAMPDETAILSDETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.49 PBSCPBPWR PWR PWRPWRPWR5.0'4.2'2.0'2.5'5.5'2.0'1.9'9.7'7.93%8.18%6.93%8.30%5.3'7.0'6.0'6.9'9.8'5.0'9.6'5.3'16.7'8.2'10.0'2.0'2.0'2.0'2.1'MATCH EXIST. SUPEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. SIGNALCABINETDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADENEAT CUT EXIST.ASPHALTRAMPLANDINGRAMP TRANSITIONPANELDEAD MANS GULCH CT.N. 19TH AVE.1.40%7.50%1.50%0.71%1.16%0.78%0.30%1.49%7.50%0.80%1.10%1.50%1.50%7.50%7.50%1.87%5.37%5.10%0.71%1.49%0.13%1.24%1.04%BEGIN TBC 52.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:62+49.72OFF:37.31'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:62+50.23OFF:35.38'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+63.18OFF:42.97'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+67.64OFF:45.94'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+79.80OFF:58.65'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:62+82.68OFF:63.44'LTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:62+89.39OFF:75.67'LTEND TBC 52.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:62+87.44OFF:76.13'LTTBC RADIUS = 52.5'STA:62+36.32OFF:88.07'LTPBGASGASGASP W R PWR4.7'2.0'1.1'22. 7 ' 2.2 8 % 6.0 9 % 8.40% 7. 8 3%8.71%2.0'5.0'5.9'5.0' 6.9' 16. 9 '7.4'2.0'4.0'2.0 '13.8'9.5'6.0' 8. 0 ' 4. 8 '11.0 '4.0'12. 8 '2.2'5.0'5.6'MATCH EXIST. SUPEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADEEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBTR A N S I T I O N P A N E L RAMPRAMPDEAD MANS GULCH CT.N. 19TH AVE. LA N D I N G0.74%4.20%0.50%1.50% 1.4 4 %0.46%2. 6 2%4.72%0.4 4 % 1.04%0.77% 1.50% 1.25 % 1. 2 5% 2.2 8 %7.10%0.77%1. 4 9 %7.10%1.50%0.93%TBC RADIUS = 49.5'STA:64+00.54OFF:84.20'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:63+52.89OFF:64.67'LTBEGIN TBC 49.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:63+54.74OFF:65.43'LTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:63+57.08OFF:56.57'LTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:63+63.55OFF:48.37'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+62.00OFF:53.14'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+58.82OFF:57.56'LTFRONT OF GUTTERGRADE BREAKSTA:63+75.40OFF:39.26'LTFRONT OF GUTTERGRADE BREAKSTA:63+90.86OFF:33.62'LTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:64+01.73OFF:32.55'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+82.31OFF:38.18'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:63+77.65OFF:40.32'LTEND TBC 49.5' RADIUSSTA:63+97.71OFF:34.78'LTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:64+01.84OFF:34.55'LTNO SCALENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 30N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - DEAD MAN'S GULCH CTNORTHEAST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - DEAD MAN'S GULCH CTSOUTHEAST CORNERN. 19TH AVE &DEAD MAN'S GULCH CTCURB RAMPDETAILS50 PBFPFPPBFOFOFOFOFOGASPWRPWRPWRPWRGASGASGASPWRPBFPFPPBFOFOFOFOGASPWRPWRPWRGASGASGASGASFOFOFOGASFOFOGASFOFO6.8'5.5'6.8'4.6'6.6'7.0'4.7'2.0'1.5'12.2'17.3'5.0'4.7'2.0'1.9'5.4'14.2'16.4'5.0'7.86%7.93%8.28%8.26%1.09%2.0'2.0' 2.0'2.0'MATCH EXIST. SUPEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXADJUST TO GRADETRANSITIONPANELRAMP RAMPLANDING E. VALLEY CENTER RD.N. 19TH AVE.0.59%1.04%5.00%1.50%1.50%0.98%4.00%1.50%1.50%2.54%8.97%0.75%4.00%5.00%1.05%0.50%0.98%0.59%9.70%FRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:48+73.40OFF:90.14'RTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:48+75.26OFF:90.72'RTBEGIN TBC 61.5' RADIUSSTA:48+76.50OFF:86.55'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:49+01.00OFF:50.93'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:48+88.61OFF:64.26'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:48+92.24OFF:60.38'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:49+02.56OFF:52.31'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:49+07.05OFF:49.80'RTEND TBC 61.5' RADIUSSTA:49+32.97OFF:43.53'RTFRONT OF GUTTER HIGH POINTSTA:49+34.55OFF:41.51'RTEND CURB AND GUTTERSTA:49+34.56OFF:43.51'RTPBPBPWR PWR PWRFOFOFOFOFOFOFPPBPBPWR PWR PWRFOFOFOFOFOFOGAS GAS GAS GAS GAS FOFO2. 4 2 % 2.8 0 % 57+ 0 0 7.72% 6. 5 6%4.9 ' 6. 0 '8.9 '5.1'3. 3 '5.5'2.0'2.0 ' 3.0'3.0'6.0'2.0'MATCH EXIST.SIDEWALKTRANSITIONPANELEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBADD 1' EXTENDER TO PPBLANDING RAMP N. 19TH AVE.E. VALLEY CENTER RD.1.50%1.19%6.54%0.00%0.49%1.50%2.41%2.41%1.13%TBC RADIUS = 43.5'STA:47+33.48OFF:100.16'RTEND TBC 43.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:47+75.63OFF:102.33'RTBEGIN TBC 43.5' RADIUSTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:47+51.96OFF:60.99'RTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:47+77.56OFF:102.45'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:47+77.30OFF:94.27'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:47+67.27OFF:73.91'RTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:47+63.43OFF:69.37'RTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:47+63.02OFF:66.20'RTFRONT OF GUTTERHIGH POINTSTA:47+52.81OFF:59.19'RTTBC RADIUS = 61.5'STA:49+33.50OFF:105.02'RTNO SCALESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 31N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - E. VALLEY CENTER RDSOUTHWEST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - E. VALLEY CENTER RDNORTHWEST CORNERN. 19TH AVE &E. VALLEY CENTER RDCURB RAMPDETAILSDETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.51 SCPBFO FOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO PWRPWRPWRPWRPWR PPSCPBFOFOFOFOFO FO FO FOFOFO FO FOFOFOFO PWRPWRPWRPWRPWR FO FO FO FOFOW W W W W 2.0'7.74%7.61%0.64%5.1'3.0'8.8'2.0'10.0'MATCH EXIST.CONCRETEEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBN. 19TH AVE.E. VALLEY CENTER RD.5.1'4.9'2.0'LANDINGRAMP1.42%1.37%0.81%6.05%6.60%1.47%0.77%0.65%0.65%0.71%0.94%1.78%6.87%2.83%7.63%0.08%TBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:48+08.13OFF:59.58'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:48+10.85OFF:63.81'LTEND 35.5' RADIUSSTA:48+15.31OFF:75.68'LTEND CURB AND GUTTERSTA:48+15.31OFF:75.68'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:48+17.32OFF:75.32'LTTBC RADIUS = 35.5'STA:47+76.76OFF:82.33'LTPBPBFO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOGAS GASPWR PWRPWRPW RPWR PBPBFO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOGAS GASPWRPWR PWRPWRPW RPWR FO FO FOGASGASFO FO W W4.8'2.0'0.3'5.0'5.0'7. 6 ' 2.0'5.8'6.6'8.04%7.6 1 % 8. 0 5 %0.5 3%8.29% 6.0' 6. 5 ' 5. 5 '6.5'6.5'10.0 ' 2.2'2.0'2.0' 2.0'2.1'EXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBLANDING RAMPRAMP N. 19TH AVE .E. VALLEY CENTER RD.1.2 2%1.50%7.00%1.00% 0. 9 3% 0.4 3 % 1.50%6.00%1.24%1.50%7.00%6.00%0.50%1.24%0.4 3 %TBC RADIUS = 38.5'STA:49+34.80OFF:84.69'LTEND TBC 38.5' RADIUSEND CURB AND GUTTERSTA:49+34.72OFF:46.19'LTBEGIN TBC 38.5' RADIUSSTA:48+95.45OFF:81.34'LTFRONT OF GUTTER LOW POINTSTA:49+34.72OFF:44.19'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:49+16.07OFF:50.85'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:49+01.51OFF:64.10'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:49+11.75OFF:53.50'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:48+98.85OFF:68.89'LTFRONT OF GUTTERHIGH POINTSTA:48+93.13OFF:85.91'LTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:48+95.18OFF:86.03'LTNO SCALENOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 32N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - E. VALLEY CENTER RDNORTHEAST CORNERINTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - E. VALLEY CENTER RDSOUTHEAST CORNERN. 19TH AVE &E. VALLEY CENTER RDCURB RAMPDETAILS52 PPPPSCPB5.0'5.9 'LANDINGRAMP5.9 '4.9'4.6'2.0'0.70%0.50% 0.50%2.3'1. 6 0 %1.47%1.47%2.10% 1.40% 6.00% 6.00%0.74%2.04%6.3 '10.4 'EXIST. CABINETDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBEXIST. PULL BOXDO NOT DISTURBI-90 EB ON RAMPN. 19TH AVE.2.9 'TBC RADIUS = 48.0'STA:43+19.96OFF:95.43'LTTBC RADIUS = 68.0'STA:43+38.58OFF:102.90'LTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:42+98.67OFF:43.64'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:42+71.53OFF:71.59'LTTBC RAMP LAYDOWNSTA:42+69.51OFF:76.16'LTFRONT OF GUTTER GRADE BREAKSTA:42+83.80OFF:54.15'LTBEGIN TBC 48.0' RADIUSSTA:43+11.86OFF:41.38'LTEND TBC 48.0' RADIUSBEGIN TBC 68.0' RADIUSSTA:42+84.32OFF:54.74'LTBEGIN CURB AND GUTTERSTA:42+68.68OFF:125.86'LT3.12%NOTES:6. MATCH EXISTING SLOPES AT ALL JOINTS BETWEEN NEW AND EXISTING CONCRETE.7. SEE MDT DETAILED DRAWINGS 608-05 THROUGH 608-40 FOR STANDARD SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER DETAILS.8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MATCH EXISTING TBC RADIUS.1.ENSURE NEW CURB &GUTTER MAINTAINEXISTING DRAINAGEPATTERNS.2.PROVIDE DETECTABLEWARNING DEVICES ON THEBOTTOM 2.0 FEET OF EACHRAMP AS SHOWN.3.SEE DTL. DWG. NO. 608-40FOR DETECTABLE WARNINGDEVICES DETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES ARE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL CURB AND GUTTER DIMENSIONS ARE ALONG TBC.5. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SLOPES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9. ALL FLARES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 10% UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LANDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' X 5' AND SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 2.1% ALONG ANY EDGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. RAMPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE WITH MINIMUM 5.0% AND MAXIMUM 8.3% SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 2.1%.11. TRANSITION PANELS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. CROSS SLOPE SHALL TRANSITION BETWEEN A 2.1% (MAX.) AT THE LANDING AND THE EXISTING CROSS SLOPE AT THE SAWCUT LINE.DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICESSAW CUT AND MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE PANELNEW SOD6" CONCRETESHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY CURB RAMP DETAILS FOR UTILITY PIH 33N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 12:22 PM 9478000UTDET004.DWG INTERSECTION OF N. 19TH AVE - I-90 EASTBOUND ON RAMP - SOUTHEAST CORNERN. 19TH AVE &I-90 EASTBOUND ON RAMPCURB RAMPDETAILS53 PB PB PB PB FP SC PB PB PB PB PWR FO FOFOFO FOFOGAS PWR PWRPP PPPP SC PB PB PB PB FP SC PB PB PB PB PBPB PB PB WVFOFOFOFOFOFOFO FOPW R FO FO FOFO FOFOGAS PWR PWRGASGASGASGASGASGASF OFOWNEAT CUT OFEXIST. ASPHALTEB I-90 ON RAMP UTILITIESUTILITY CROSSINGSNOTES:1.SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR MEDIAN CURBRECONSTRUCTION INFORMATION.2.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY SAWCUT LAYOUT,ELEVATIONS, AND SLOPES.R =9 6' 45+00 TS 43+12.50 SC 44+62.50 PI = 48+59.77Δ= 13° 50' 13"(LT.)R = 3,274'T = 397.27'L = 790.68'E = 24.01'SPI PI = 44+12.50Δ = 178° 41' 15"LS = 150'(LT.)S18° 05' 01.02"WBEGIN SAWCUTSTA:42+72.36OFF:167.37' LT.END SAWCUTSTA:48+40.24OFF:38.16' LT.BEGIN MEDIANCONSTRUCTIONSTA:42+36.20OFF:8.48' RT.END SAWCUTSTA:48+36.87OFF:100.42' LT.TBCSTA:47+09.17OFF:43.43' LT.TBCSTA:46+10.55OFF:51.70' LT.47+56FO U.G.47+60 TO 49+30U.G. FO LT.48+13 TO 49+03U.G. PWR LT.STA:43+21.78OFF:24.16' LT.STA:47+59.94OFF:34.64' LT.TBC PCSTA:43+21.14OFF:41.71' LT.TBC PTSTA:42+68.68OFF:125.86' LT.TBC PCSTA:47+77.99OFF:43.97' LT.TBC PTSTA:48+15.31OFF:75.68' LT.TBCSTA:42+39.67OFF:4.54' RT.TBCSTA:42+39.44OFF:11.64' RT.TBCSTA:47+53.22OFF:3.14' LT.TBCSTA:47+53.73OFF:6.17' LT.STA:42+56.94OFF:122.48' LT.END MEDIAN CONSTRUCTIONSTA:47+54.79OFF:4.81' LT.APPARENT EX. R/WR=74'MEDIANOPENING TYP -SEE PG. ## FORDETAILSTBCSTA:47+07.62OFF:9.65' LT.N. 19TH AVE.STA 43+4171.5' LTSTA 43+4476.3' LT STA 47+32 72.1' LTT STA 47+65 61.8' LTT46654670467546804685 46654670467546804685EXISTING GRADE =PROPOSED GRADE45+0046+05.00 12" X 24.8' STM AT 2.02% 45+70.00 12" X 26.6' STM AT 3.76% 42+36.20 47+54.79 42+81.81 48+16.44 42+68.72 48+15.31 NEW 5' SIDEWALK LT.NEW CURB AND GUTTER LT.NEW PINNED DOWN TYPE "A" CURB AND CONCRETE CAPBIOFILTRATION SWALE LT.STA:47+77.00 ELEV:4672.20 STA:44+00.00ELEV:4670.37+26 43+26.00EX. 24" CMPPROTECT IN PL.44+05DITCH BLOCK LT.SEE DETAILS45+40DITCH BLOCK LT.SEE DETAILS46+75DITCH BLOCK LT.SEE DETAILS46+75MEDIAN OPENING47+25MEDIAN OPENING45+75MEDIAN OPENING45+25MEDIAN OPENING42+36BEGIN MEDIANCONSTRUCTION 47+54.79 BEGIN MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION MEDIAN CURB CUTNEW CONCRETEMILL AND OVERLAYLEGEND:FULL PAVEMENTRECONSTRUCTIONSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN AND PROFILE FOR UTILITY PIH 34N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/18/2024 1:25 PM 9478000UTPLP001.DWG T. 01 S. R. 05 E. SEC. 26 54 PB FP FP P B P B PBP B PB FP SC PBPBPBPBPWR PWRFOFOFO FO FOFOFO FOGAS PWRPWR P P FP P PFP FP PPPPPPPPFPFPFPFP PB FP FP P B P B PBP B PB FP SC PBPBPBPB521374666.491EDGEWAT BOB TC PBPBPBFP PB PB WVPWRPWR PWRPWRPWRFOFOFOFOPWRPWRPWRFOFO FOPWRPWR FOFOFOFOFO FO FOGAS PWRPWR FOFOGAS GAS FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOGASGASGASGASGASGASGASFOFOFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOPWRPWRPWRFOFOFOPWRGASPWRPWRGASGASGASGASGASGASFOWNEAT CUT OF EXIST. ASPHALTE. VALLEY CENTERBEGIN SAWCUTSTA:52+00.00OFF:21.50' RT.END SAWCUTSTA:57+42.90OFF:21.50' RTEND SAWCUTSTA:57+42.90OFF:20.00' LT.BEGIN SAWCUTSTA:52+00.00OFF:10.00' LT.BEGIN MEDIAN RECONSTRUCTIONTBC SAWCUT - MATCH EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERSTA:52+10.97OFF:4.65' RT.END MEDIANCONSTRUCTIONSTA:57+16.53OFF:6.97' LT.UTILITIESUTILITY CROSSINGS56+23U.G. PWR56+87 TO 57+88U.G. FO LT.NOTES:1.SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR MEDIAN CURB RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATION.2.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY SAWCUT LAYOUT, ELEVATIONS, AND SLOPES.TBCSTA:52+19.78OFF:12.23' RT.TBCSTA:52+21.09OFF:2.82' LT.TBCSTA:53+19.05OFF:12.01' RT.TBCSTA:54+17.81OFF:0.59' RT.TBCSTA:56+97.80OFF:0.27' RT.TBCSTA:57+15.55OFF:4.95' LT.TBCSTA:57+15.00OFF:8.63' LT.R=1021'R=1000'STA:53+52.42OFF:21.50' RT.STA:53+57.22OFF:10.10' LT.STA:57+18.91OFF:21.50' RT.STA:57+18.91OFF:20.00' LT.NEAT CUT OFEXIST. ASPHALTTBCSTA:56+73.66OFF:13.11' LT.52+0053+0054+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 52+0053+0054+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 PCC 53+52.42 PCC 57+18 . 9 1 EP 58+07. 7 1MEDIAN OPENING (TYP.) -SEE PG. ## FOR DETAILS46704675468046704675468052+0053+0054+0055+0056+0057+0058+00EXISTING GRADE =PROPOSED GRADE52+10.97 57+16.53NEW MEDIAN WITH TYPE "A" PINNED DOWN CURB AND CONCRETE CAP+34 E VALLEY CENTER RD MEDIAN RECONSTRUCTION52+90MEDIAN OPENING53+90MEDIAN OPENING54+90MEDIAN OPENING52+80DITCH BLOCK LT.SEE DETAILSMEDIAN CURB CUTNEW CONCRETEMILL AND OVERLAYLEGEND:FULL PAVEMENTRECONSTRUCTIONSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY PLAN AND PROFILE FOR UTILITY PIH 35N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UT - UTILITIES 6/18/2024 1:25 PM 9478000UTPLP001.DWG T. 0 1 S .R. 0 5 E . S EC . 2 6NOTE:USE EXISTING GRADE AT SAWCUTS TO CONSTRUCT MEDIAN55 WV MHWVPB PBSCPBPBFPSDDIFPFPFPPBSDGASPWRFOFO PWRPWRGASPWRWVPBFPFPPB PBPBPBPBFPSCPBPBPBPBPPFPPPPBFPFPPBPBPBPBPBFPSCPBPBPBPBPBWVPWRPWRFOFOFOFO FOFOFOFOGASPWRPWRPWRPWR FOFOFO FOFOFOFOGASPWRPWR FOFOFOFOGASFOGAS FOFOWFOWVWVWVPBPBPBPB PBSCPBPBWVFHGASGAS PWR PWR PWRGASFOW PI 177+71.58WV WV WVMH PBTPTPFPPBPBFHWVSDDIPBDIMHPBSCPBPBPBPBFPPWRPW R PWRPWRTELTELTELTELFOFOFOFOTELFO FOPWR-OHSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY APPROACH MILLING LIMITS FOR UTILITY PIH 36N. 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 9:43 AM 9478000UTDET001.DWG APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & E. VALLEY CENTER RD.APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & CATTAIL ST.APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & TSCHACHE LN.APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & W. OAK ST.56 PT 204+15.52WVWV WV MHMHFHWVPBPBPBFHWVPBPBPBSCPWRPWR-OHPWRPWR PWRPWR-OHPWR-OHWVWV WVWVWVWV MHDISCPBWVPBFPFHPBPBFHWVWVPBFO PWR W FOPWR-OHPWR-OHPWRPWR 230+00PT 227+99.07PC 228+15.67WV WV WV WV MHMHMHPBPBPBSCPBPBPBPBWVWVWHPWRPWRGASTELTELWWSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY APPROACH MILLING LIMITS --------37N. 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 9:43 AM 9478000UTDET001.DWG DD/MM/YY APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & DURSTON RD.APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & BEALL ST.APPROACH MILLING LIMITSN. 19TH AVE. & MAIN ST.57 STA. 207+34STA. 207+59207+00 208+00 APPROX. SAWCUT & FULL-DEPTHPMS REMOVAL AREA (FINAL LIMITS DETERMINED INFIELD BY PROJECT MANAGER)N. 19TH AVENUE - N.B.N. 19TH AVENUE - S.B.DIGOUT TYPICAL SECTION(STA 207+34 LT TO 207+59 LT)12.0'N.B.TRAVEL LANEDIGOUT0.20' PLANT MIX (per Typical Section No. 14)0.20' COLD MILLING (per Typical Section No. 14)0.50' PLANT MIX(0.20' PLANT MIX surfacing per Typical Section No. 14)(0.30' PLANT MIX additional surfacing for Digout)12.0'N.B.TRAVEL LANEMEDIANSAWCUT & REMOVEEXISTING PLANT MIXSHEET NO.PROJECT ID COUNTY UPN PROJECT NAME MONTANA Department of Transportation DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY CHECKED BY DETAIL DIGOUT EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY PIH 38N 19TH AVENUE - BOZEMAN GALLATIN NH 412-1(1)0 9478000 UTILITY PLANS 6/17/2024 9:43 AM 9478000UTDET002.DWGQUANTITIES - DIGOUTUNITDIGOUTEXCAVATIONAGGREGATEUNITBITUMINOUS MATERIALPLANT MIXSURFACINGEMULSIFIED ASPHALTTACK #SQ. YDS.35*35*SQ. YDS.70*CU. YDS.63.5GALS.4TONS7* AREA MEASURED IN CAD# BASED ON 2 APPLICATIONS58 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Jac Miller, Water Treatment Plant Assistant Superintendent Jill Miller, WTP Superintendent Shawn Kohtz, Utilities Director SUBJECT:Authorize City Manager to Sign the Professional Services Agreement With 120Water to Coordinate the Lead and Copper Sampling in Compliance Period 2025. MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize City Manager to Sign the Professional Services Agreement With 120Water to Coordinate the Lead and Copper Sampling in Compliance Period 2025. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.1 Outreach: Continue to strengthen and innovate in how we deliver information to the community and our partners. BACKGROUND:City of Bozeman is required to sample for lead and copper in the distribution system per EPA and DEQ regulations. Historically this has been a triennial sampling schedule. This takes over 100 hours of staff time to coordinate with customers to have them collect the samples, staff to pick up the samples, ship them to a certified lab, review results, compile a report for the DEQ and notify customers. Customer coordination and compliance with arranged sampling events is challenging and time consuming. The next sampling event is scheduled for June through September 2025. The increase in population and service connections increases the amount regulatory sampling and reporting requirements beyond the current WTP staffing level can reasonably accomplish. Contracting the lead and copper sampling allows WTP staff to focus on more immediate regulatory sampling and reporting requirements. 120Water will manage and coordinate outreach and customer sampling events, review data, notify customers of results, and give maximum contaminant level alerts. The contract also includes the cost of sample analysis. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:Attempt to complete it ourselves using over 100 hours of employee time. FISCAL EFFECTS:Budgeted for in WTP Operations budget. 59 Attachments: 120Water 2024 PSA with Exhibits.pdf Report compiled on: August 15, 2024 60 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 1 of 15 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, 120 Water, Inc. (d/b/a 120Water), 250 Elm Street, Zionsville, IN 46077, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties” (whether or not capitalized). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose: City agrees to enter this Agreement with Contractor to perform for City services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof (the “Services”). 2. Term/Effective Date: This Agreement is effective upon the Effective Date and will automatically terminate upon completion of the Services or December 31, 2025, whichever is earlier. 3. Scope of Services: Contractor will perform the work and provide the services in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services. For conflicts between this Agreement and the Scope of Services, unless specifically provided otherwise, the Agreement governs. 4. Payment: City agrees to pay Contractor the amount specified in the Scope of Services. Any alteration or deviation from the described services that involves additional costs above the Agreement amount will be performed by Contractor only after written request by the City, and will become an additional charge over and above the amount listed in the Scope of Services. The City must agree in writing upon any additional charges. Any fees hereunder not paid when due will be subject to a late charge of one and one-half percent (1½%) per month on the unpaid balance or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is less. If City account is fifteen (15) days or more overdue, then Contractor may, in addition to any of its other rights or remedies, suspend providing the Services until such amounts are paid in full. If City 61 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 2 of 15 brings its account current within fifteen (15) days after suspension commences, then Contractor will restart access to the Services. If such failure to pay has not been cured within thirty (30) days of the payment due date, then upon written notice, Contractor may terminate this Agreement and any Scope of Services. 5. Intellectual Property: a. Definitions: i. “120Water Platform” means Contractor’s proprietary online hosted software platform, website, operating systems, hardware, and other technical resources used by Contractor to provide the Services. ii. “City Data” means all electronic data (including, but not limited to, Personal Information, such as names, addresses, and contact information of City residents), uploaded by City or Contractor to the 120Water Platform. iii. “Deliverables” means (A) the deliverables (e.g., custom reports) specified in an applicable Scope of Services (attached hereto or as entered into and signed by both parties during this Agreement) that are expressly created by Contractor for City and (B) all reports provided or made accessible to City pursuant to the Scope of Services. iv. “Derivative Data” means collectively, (A) information derived or generated from or based on City Data, but not containing City Data, (B) City Data which has been de-identified or anonymized so that it no longer identifies a specific individual; and, (C) City Data which has been aggregated with other data but which no longer identifies a specific individual or City. v. “Documentation” means the user guides and specifications for the Services that are made available from time to time by Contractor in electronic or tangible form, but excluding any sales or marketing materials. vi. “Usage Data” means statistical data related to City’s access to and use of the Services and data derived from it that is used by Contractor, including to compile statistical and performance information related to the provision of the Services and operation of the 120Water Platform. b. Ownership and Use: i. Subject to the limited rights expressly granted hereunder, Contractor reserves all rights, title and interest in and to the 120Water Platform, including, but not limited 62 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 3 of 15 to, all software, technology and other materials associated therewith, all Documentation and content (excluding City Data), and all copies, modifications, upgrades, enhancements and derivative works thereof, and all of Contractor’s trademarks, names, logos, and all rights to patent, copyright, trade secret and other proprietary or intellectual property rights therein. No rights are granted to City hereunder other than as expressly set forth herein. As between Contractor and City, City owns all City Data and Deliverables. Contractor may use the City Data, trademarks and trade names of City in connection with provision of the Services to City. ii. If City provides or otherwise makes available to Contractor any feedback, suggestions, recommendations, data, or other input regarding the 120Water Platform, Services, or Documentation, or resulting from City’s use thereof (collectively, “Feedback”), City agrees to and does hereby assign to Contractor all right, title, and interest in and to all Feedback. Contractor shall not publicly identify City in any use of the Feedback. City has no responsibility or liability for any Feedback or for Contractor’s use thereof. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any use by Contractor of any Feedback. iii. Contractor shall irrevocably own all Derivative Data and Usage Data and may use or disclose it in any way it chooses. This Section 5.b.iii. shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. iv. Upon City’s request within thirty (30) days after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor will provide City with a copy of City Data held by Contractor. Upon expiration of such thirty (30) day period, Contractor shall convert City’s account to an inactive status. Contractor is obligated to delete all City Data after City’s account converts to inactive status. The confidentiality obligations as are set forth in this Section 5.b.iv. shall remain in force and effect at all times during this Agreement, and (A) with respect to confidential information that constitutes a trade secret under applicable law, for so long as such trade secret status has not been lost; and (B) with respect to confidential information that does not constitute a trade secret, for five (5) years after termination or expiration of this Agreement, and (C) with respect to Personal Information held by Contractor, forever. 6. Confidentiality: During this Agreement and after any expiration or termination, other than as expressly permitted otherwise under this Agreement, each party as recipient shall maintain confidential any information of the disclosing party comprising confidential, proprietary, or nonpublic information. In the event a third party makes a request of City for information under any applicable open records act for documents or information related to this Agreement which may be subject to exclusion from disclosure based on confidential information or trade secrets, City will advise Contractor that a request has been made and allow Contractor an opportunity to object to 63 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 4 of 15 disclosure, subject to the requirements of the open records act. 7. Contractor’s Representations: To induce City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor makes the following representations: a. Contractor has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of this Agreement, the Scope of Services, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Scope of Services. b. Contractor has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement and grant the rights granted in it; and that its performance of this Agreement shall not infringe upon or violate the rights of any third party, whether rights of copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, libel, slander or any other rights of any nature whatsoever, or violate any federal, state and municipal laws. 8. Service Warranty: Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the experience and ability to perform the services required by this Agreement; that it will perform the services in a professional, competent and timely manner in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and in accordance with the applicable Scope of Services (all of the foregoing collectively referred to as the “Service Warranty”). City must report to Contractor in writing any failure of the Services to materially conform to the Service Warranty within ninety (90) days of performance of such Services in order to receive warranty remedies. Warranties for third-party products are governed under the applicable third-party warranty terms, and City expressly acknowledges that Contractor has no obligations with regard to third-party products. Except for the warranties expressly stated herein, contractor provides all services as-is, and contractor disclaims all other warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title, and non-infringement. 9. Independent Contractor Status/Labor Relations: The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for 64 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 5 of 15 all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes between Contractor and its personnel of any type arise or materialize which, in turn, cause any Services to cease for any period of time, Contractor agrees to promptly take reasonable steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. 10. Indemnity/Waiver of Claims/Insurance: For other than professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all third-party claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. For the professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against third-party claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable defense attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Contractor or Contractor’s agents or employees. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the City as indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. 65 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 6 of 15 Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance policies required below, the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the Services performed hereunder. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractor shall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as follows: ● Workers’ Compensation – as required by applicable statutory requirements; ● Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $1,000,000 annual aggregate; ● Commercial General Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; ● Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury per accident; and ● Professional Liability - $1,000,000 per claim; $1,000,000 annual aggregate. The City shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on the Commercial General and Employer’s Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of notice that any 66 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 7 of 15 required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. 11. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a. If Contractor, after receiving notice of breach from City for either of the following and failing to cure such breach within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice, (i) fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement or (ii) breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the work (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the work and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 11, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. c. Any termination provided for by this Section 11 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. 12. Termination for Convenience: a. Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease performance under this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement by providing at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. b. Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed therein, the Contractor shall immediately cease performance under this Agreement and make reasonable efforts to refrain from continuing work, incurring additional expenses or costs under this Agreement and, where reasonably practicable, shall promptly cancel all existing orders or contracts. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed or immediately in progress. 67 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 8 of 15 c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 12, Contractor is entitled to payment through the remainder of the then-current subscription term (as set forth in Exhibit A or the applicable order form agreed to in writing by the parties). 13. Limitation on Damages: Except for intellectual property infringement, breach of confidentiality, indemnification obligations, or City’s payment obligations, in no event shall either party’s total aggregate liability arising out of or related to this agreement, whether in contract, tort or under any other theory of liability, exceed two times the amounts paid by City under the Scope of Services ($29,682.88) for the services for which liability is claimed in the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the incident giving rise to liability. Except for intellectual property infringement, breach of confidentiality, indemnification obligations, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this agreement, the parties expressly agree that in no event shall either party have any liability to the other party for any lost profits or for any indirect, incidental punitive, consequential or special damages of any kind or nature however caused, including without limitation damages for loss of goodwill, substitute goods or services, work stoppage, lost profits or computer failure incurred by either party or any third party, whether in contract, tort or under any other theory of liability, whether or not the party has been advised of the possibility of such damages. In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature or kind. In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within thirty (30) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 14. Representatives and Notices: a. City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Jill Miller, Water Treatment Plant Superintendent, or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or 68 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 9 of 15 submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents as designated by the City in writing and may receive approvals or authorization from such persons. b. Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be Ethan Miller or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to the Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email (with a read receipt) to the email address provided by the party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 15. Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, and pay all fees and charges in connection therewith. 16. Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. 17. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person 69 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 10 of 15 in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 18. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations/Safety and Training: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, by any employee or agent engaged in services to the City under this Agreement while on City property or in the performance of any activities under this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 19. Modification and Assignability: This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. The Contractor may not assign Contractor’s rights, including the right to compensation or duties arising hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City; provided that Contractor may assign, convey, or transfer (whether by contract, merger, or operation of law) (collectively “assign” and its cognates) without City’s consent any or all of Contractor’s rights or obligations under this Agreement in connection with a merger, acquisition, corporate reorganization, or sale of all or substantially all of Contractor’s assets or equity, provided that Contractor reasonably believes the assignee has the operational ability to perform Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement. Contractor will provide reasonable notice to City of 70 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 11 of 15 any merger or acquisition and the City may choose to terminate in its discretion as a termination for convenience under section 12. Any assignee will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 20. Subcontractors: a. Contractor may engage subcontractors to perform or to support Contractor’s performance of portions of the Services provided or made available to substantially all of Contractor’s customers (e.g., data hosting, water testing, and other service providers), provided that Contractor may not subcontract to a subcontractor dedicated to City’s account any custom Services or custom-created Deliverables specifically purchased only by City (and set forth in a separate Scope of Services) without City’s prior written consent, such consent not being unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned. Contractor shall provide the City with a list of all subcontractors employed. b. Contractor remains fully responsible for the acts and omissions of any subcontractor, just as Contractor is for its own acts and omissions, and Contractor shall remain fully responsible and liable for the timely completion of the Services. c. Contractor is solely liable for any and all payments to subcontractors. Contractor shall hold applicable portions of all payments received from the City in trust for the benefit of subcontractors, and all such payments shall be used to satisfy obligations of the Services before being used for any other purpose. Contractor shall make any payments due to any subcontractor within seven (7) days of Contractor’s receipt of payment, including a proportional part of the retainage Contractor has received from the City. In the event of a dispute regarding any subcontractor’s invoice, Contractor shall promptly pay the undisputed amount to the subcontractor and notify the subcontractor in writing of the amount in dispute and the reasons for the dispute. Any withholding of payment must comply with the requirements of §28-2-2103, MCA. In the event Contractor is unwilling or unable to make timely and proper payment to any subcontractor, City may elect to withhold any payment otherwise due to Contractor and upon seven (7) days’ written notice to Contractor, may pay subcontractor by direct or joint payment. 21. Reports; Public Information: Contractor agrees to develop and/or provide documentation as reasonably requested by the City demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor shall allow the City, its auditors, and other persons authorized by the City to inspect and copy its books and records for the purpose of verifying that the reimbursement of monies distributed to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement was used in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. The Contractor shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior approval of the City. 71 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 12 of 15 22. Non-Waiver: A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any terms or conditions of this Agreement does not limit the other party’s right to enforce such term or conditions or to pursue any available legal or equitable rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 23. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 24. Force Majeure: Any delay in performance (other than for the payment of amounts due; provided, such non-payment does not exceed thirty (30) days) caused by conditions beyond the reasonable control of the performing party (“Force Majeure Event”) is not a breach of the Agreement. The time for performance will be extended for a period equal to the duration of the conditions preventing performance; provided that the party prevented from performing its obligations: (a) has promptly notified the other party upon becoming aware that any Force Majeure Event has occurred or is likely to occur, (b) uses commercially reasonable efforts to implement a workaround and to minimize any delay in or interference with the performance of its obligations under the Agreement, and (c) did not cause or contribute to the cause of the Force Majeure Event. If the Force Majeure Event renders the Services completely unavailable for more than thirty (30) consecutive days, then City may terminate the Agreement upon written notice to Contractor (in which case City will receive a refund of prepaid fees starting from the beginning of the period of unavailability due to such conditions). For the avoidance of doubt, City is not obligated to pay Contractor during the period when a Force Majeure Event renders the Services unavailable. 25. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. 26. Dispute Resolution: a. Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute may only be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in compliance with the applicable law provisions of this Agreement. 72 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 13 of 15 27. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. The following Sections shall also survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement: Section 5 (Intellectual Property), 6 (Confidentiality), and 13 (Limitation of Liability). 28. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 29. Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the balance thereof shall continue in effect. 30. Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 31. Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 32. No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 33. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 34. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained herein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. This Agreement may be modified only in writing signed by both parties. 35. Consent to Electronic Signatures: The parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 73 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 14 of 15 74 Professional Services Agreement with 120Water Page 15 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written or as recorded in an electronic signature. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA 120 Water, Inc. CONTRACTOR By________________________________ By__________________________________ Chuck Winn, City Manager Print Name: ___________________________ Print Title: ____________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 75 •Develop Program Model Blueprint with the client to establish goals, program timeline, preferences on documentation and communication strategy, and to review services •Perform one-time Implementation for the LCR sampling program, including software provisioning, documentation development, 120Water Support Team Internal Knowledge Transfer, Accredited Laboratory Kickoff, and Software Platform Training LCR Compliance Overview What we do... Client Delivery Services •Implementation and Client Kickoff •Go-Live! strategy and communication for outreach and/or testing kits •On-going management and coordination with every sample •Lab review and data keeping •Consumer Notification sending •Maximum Contaminant Level Alerts, if applicable •Support Team to assist residents throughout •A designated LCR Program Consultant to help oversee progress and to provide weekly updates •Assistance with reporting at the end of the monitoring period For questions on Client Delivery for LCR Sampling, please reach out to 120Water's Sampling Practice Lead, Taylor, at taylor@120water.com •Import approved Tier sites into our Public Water System platform, and set up program and events for sampling monitoring, kit tracking, result record-keeping and reporting purposes •Outbound and inbound outreach, which could include phone calls, emails, texts, letters and/or postcards, to residents throughout the sample period; 5 points of outreach are included with your testing kit purchase •Coordination with the lab on sample receipt and intake, and QAQC process for all CoCs •Result notification mailing to residents within 5 business days of receipt of results •Assistance with reporting to state primacy, including progress review with lab partners and/or gathering required documents for public water systems to submit Lead and Copper RuleCompliance Monitoring From providing sample kits to centralizing your data, executing customer communication and delivering program support through our team of industry experts, 120Water can ensure you are always on top of LCR compliance. 120Water.com What we do NOT do... •Select or approve Tier sites •Perform specialized or customized data reports •Report Lead or Copper results to your state Primacy Agency •Give health advice to consumers 76 Signed Contract & Client Onboarding From the time of closing the contract, 120Water will work to begin introductions and to perform client onboarding with the 120Water Client Experience Manager. From there you will be assigned a Compliance Program Consultant to lead your LCR efforts. Program Model Blueprint Development & Client Kickoff Your Program Consultant will lead your team through development of your LCR specific Program Model Blueprint, which outlines programmatic timeline, goals, preferences & all things implementation for your event. This can take place within two weeks after your contract closes, or eight weeks prior to the start of your LCR monitoring event, depending on when your monitoring event starts! 120Water Public Water System Software Platform & Implementation The implementation of your LCR monitoring event typically takes six - eight weeks prior to day one of your sampling period (i.e. January 1, June 1 or July 1). Implementation includes kickoff, development of material, software provisioning, lab and support team kickoffs, fulfillment team kickoff, and preparation to Go-Live! with outreach to residents or sending testing kits. Lead & Copper Rule - Timeline Lead & Copper Rule - Go-Live! Distribution of Kits & Resident Outreach 120Water will help you progress through the onboarding and implementation phases of your client journey, ultimately working towards making that first point of contact with your consumers! Outreach to residents should include an introduction to 120Water & the partnership with your utility, and should be distributed anywhere from six to two weeks prior to the start of your monitoring event, depending on your preferences and when your contract is signed. On-going Execution & Management Your 120Water team, including your dedicated Program Consultant and the 120Water Support Team, will be hard at work throughout your LCR event, monitoring and tracking sample kits, ensuring all sample protocols have been met, and working closely with your assigned state accredited laboratory. Your team will be provided with weekly Progress Reports throughout the monitoring period, and you will have 24/7 access to your 120Water Software Platform to check status of kits or to review results. Reporting to Primacy Agency As the end of the monitoring period approaches, 120Water will continue to monitor those final samples, coordinate with the laboratory for reporting purposes, and monitor your state Drinking Water Watch for LCR results to post, if applicable. The utility is responsible for submitting any required documentation or forms to the state primacy agency - this includes Distribution of Consumer Notice forms, 90th Percentile forms, and examples of result letters sent to residents. Most of our laboratories can report lead and copper results to the state directly. 120Water will assist you in gathering information for submission, but cannot submit on your behalf. The Lead & Copper Rule is part of 120Water’s suite of solutions for water professionals. Learn more about our full range of tools, kits, and services at 120water.com 120Water.com Recommended Timeline for Success! Onboarding o Standard - October or April o Reduced - March Kickoff & Implementation o Standard - October through December or April through June o Reduced - March through May Outreach & Go-Live! o Standard - December or June o Reduced - MayStart Early! 77 City of Bozeman - MT City of Bozeman - MT 121 N Rouse Ave, - City of Bozeman, MT 59715 United States Reference: 20240521-105759401 Quote created: May 21, 2024 Quote expires: June 20, 2024 Quote created by: Ethan Miller ethan.miller@120water.com Comments from Ethan Miller Contract start date is time of signature Products & Services Item Name & Description Unit Price Quantity Term (months) PWS Pro $7,500.00  / year 1 12 Compliance Sampling Managed Service (LCR/LCRR Compliance) (Up to 5,000) - 1x $5,000.00 1 12 1 Bottle 1L Kit $34.74 36 12 1 Bottle Lead & Copper Test $36.36 30 12 PWS Software Platform with Inventory, Program and Event Management and Workflows Annual Managed Service to monitor and support LCR/LCRR Compliance Sampling 1 Bottle Compliance Kit Lead and copper analytes testing for 1 bottle 78 Annual subtotal $7,500.00 One-time subtotal $7,341.44 Total $14,841.44 Purchase terms Net 30 Billing Invoice Terms: Billing Street Address: Billing City: Billing State: Billing Zip Code: Billing Country: Billing Notes (if applicable):   This Order Form, together with the Master Services Agreement available at https://120water.com/master- services-agreement/ (the “MSA”), shall become a legally binding contract upon the earlier of (a) the date both parties execute the Order Form or (b) the date Customer initially began using the Services. Any capitalized word not otherwise defined in this Order Form shall have the same meaning as set forth in the MSA.   120Water may reject this Order Form if: (1) the signatory below does not have the authority to bind Customer to this Order Form, (2) changes have been made to this Order Form (other than completion of the purchase order information and signature block), or (3) the requested purchase order information or signature is incomplete or does not match our records or the rest of this Order Form. Subscriptions are non-cancelable before their end of the Term. 79 Signature Signature Date Printed name Countersignature Countersignature Date Printed name Questions? Contact me Ethan Miller ethan.miller@120water.com 120Water 250 S Elm St Zionsville, IN 46077 US 80 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Nic Focken- Parking Manager Ben Bailey - Neighborhood Services and Code Compliance Program Manager SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to sign a PSA with Apex Group Inc. for the Repair of the Rouse Parking Lot. MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to sign a PSA with Apex Group Inc. for the Repair of the Rouse Parking Lot. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.3 Strategic Infrastructure Choices: Prioritize long-term investment and maintenance for existing and new infrastructure. BACKGROUND:The Rouse Parking lot at 315 East Babcock has come to its end of life for its asphalt. The lot is missing asphalt in areas and cracking all over. This project has been budgeted for in the CIP under the code PO17. The project will be removing and disposing of the old asphalt, repaving the lot to the depth of 3", and restriping the lot. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None at this time. ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:The project will have a cost of $62,500 and will be funded from the CIP budget PO17. Attachments: PSA 315 E Babcock Apex Group.pdf Report compiled on: August 14, 2024 81 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 2 of 14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of ____________, 202__ (“Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self-governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and, ____________, _______________, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” The City and Contractor may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose: City agrees to enter this Agreement with Contractor to perform for City services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. Term/Effective Date: This Agreement is effective upon the Effective Date unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement. 3. Scope of Services: Contractor will perform the work and provide the services in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services. For conflicts between this Agreement and the Scope of Services, unless specifically provided otherwise, the Agreement governs. 4. Payment: City agrees to pay Contractor the amount specified in the Scope of Services, exhibit A . Any alteration or deviation from the described services that involves additional costs above the Agreement amount will be performed by Contractor after written request by the City, and will become an additional charge over and above the amount listed in the Scope of Services. The City must agree in writing upon any additional charges. 5. Contractor’s Representations: To induce City to enter into this Agreement, 82 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 3 of 14 Contractor makes the following representations: a. Contractor has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of this Agreement, the Scope of Services, and with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress or performance of the Scope of Services. b. Contractor represents and warrants to City that it has the experience and ability to perform the services required by this Agreement; that it will perform the services in a professional, competent and timely manner and with diligence and skill; that it has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement and grant the rights granted in it; and that its performance of this Agreement shall not infringe upon or violate the rights of any third party, whether rights of copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity, libel, slander or any other rights of any nature whatsoever, or violate any federal, state and municipal laws. The City will not determine or exercise control as to general procedures or formats necessary to have these services meet this warranty. 6. Independent Contractor Status/Labor Relations: The parties agree that Contractor is an independent contractor for purposes of this Agreement and is not to be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. Contractor is not subject to the terms and provisions of the City’s personnel policies handbook and may not be considered a City employee for workers’ compensation or any other purpose. Contractor is not authorized to represent the City or otherwise bind the City in any dealings between Contractor and any third parties. Contractor shall comply with the applicable requirements of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 39, Chapter 71, Montana Code Annotated (MCA), and the Occupational Disease Act of Montana, Title 39, Chapter 71, MCA. Contractor shall maintain workers’ compensation coverage for all members and employees of Contractor’s business, except for those members who are exempted by law. Contractor shall furnish the City with copies showing one of the following: (1) a binder for workers’ compensation coverage by an insurer licensed and authorized to provide workers’ compensation insurance in the State of Montana; or (2) proof of exemption from workers’ compensation granted by law for independent contractors. Contractor shall post a legible statement of all wages and fringe benefits to be paid to the Contractor’s employees and the frequency of such payments (i.e., hourly wage employees shall be paid weekly). Such posting shall be made in a prominent and accessible location at the Contractor’s normal place of business and shall be made no later than the first day of services provided under this Agreement. Such posting shall be removed only upon expiration or termination of this Agreement. In performing the services under this Agreement, Contractor shall give preference to the employment of bona fide residents of Montana, as required by §18-2-403, MCA, as such term is 83 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 4 of 14 defined by §18-2-401(1), MCA. When making assignments of work, Contractor shall use workers both skilled in their trade and specialized in their field of work for all work to which they are assigned. Pursuant to §§18-2-403 and 18-2-422, MCA, Contractor shall pay wages, fringe benefits, and expenses, including travel allowances as set forth in the current Montana Prevailing Wage Rate for Non Construction Services in effect and applicable to Gallatin County, Montana, which schedule is incorporated herein. Contractor shall pay all hourly wage employees on a weekly basis. Violation of the requirements set forth in the above State of Montana schedule of prevailing wage rates may subject the Contractor to the penalties set forth in §18-2-407, MCA. Contractor shall maintain payroll records during the term of this Agreement and for a period of three (3) years following termination of this Agreement. The Contractor shall ensure that any person, firm or entity performing any portion of the services under this Agreement for which the contractor, subcontractor or employer is responsible, is paid the applicable standard prevailing rate of wages. In the event that, during the term of this Agreement, any labor problems or disputes of any type arise or materialize which in turn cause any services to cease for any period of time, Contractor specifically agrees to take immediate steps, at its own expense and without expectation of reimbursement from City, to alleviate or resolve all such labor problems or disputes. The specific steps Contractor shall take shall be left to the discretion of Contractor; provided, however, that Contractor shall bear all costs of any related legal action. Contractor shall provide immediate relief to the City so as to permit the services to continue at no additional cost to City. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and liabilities arising out of, resulting from, or occurring in connection with any labor problems or disputes or any delays or stoppages of work associated with such problems or disputes and for any claims regarding underpaid prevailing wages. 7. Indemnity/Waiver of Claims/Insurance: For other than professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to release, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, representatives, employees, and officers (collectively referred to for purposes of this Section as the City) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, fees and costs (including attorney’s fees and the costs and fees of expert witness and consultants), losses, expenses, liabilities (including liability where activity is inherently or intrinsically dangerous) or damages of whatever kind or nature connected therewith and without limit and without regard to the cause or causes thereof or the negligence of any party or parties that may be asserted against, recovered from or suffered by the City occasioned by, growing or arising out of or resulting from or in any way related to: (i) the negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of the Contractor; or (ii) 84 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 5 of 14 any negligent, reckless, or intentional misconduct of any of the Contractor’s agents. For the professional services rendered, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless against claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses, including reasonable defense attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Contractor or Contractor’s agents or employees. Such obligations shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity that would otherwise exist. The indemnification obligations of this Section must not be construed to negate, abridge, or reduce any common-law or statutory rights of the City as indemnitee(s) which would otherwise exist as to such indemnitee(s). Contractor’s indemnity under this Section shall be without regard to and without any right to contribution from any insurance maintained by City. Should the City be required to bring an action against the Contractor to assert its right to defense or indemnification under this Agreement or under the Contractor’s applicable insurance policies required below, the City shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in asserting its right to indemnification or defense but only if a court of competent jurisdiction determines the Contractor was obligated to defend the claim(s) or was obligated to indemnify the City for a claim(s) or any portion(s) thereof. In the event of an action filed against the City resulting from the City’s performance under this Agreement, the City may elect to represent itself and incur all costs and expenses of suit. Contractor also waives any and all claims and recourse against the City, including the right of contribution for loss or damage to person or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to the performance of this Agreement except “responsibility for [City’s] own fraud, for willful injury to the person or property of another, or for violation of law, whether willful or negligent” as per 28-2-702, MCA. These obligations shall survive termination of this Agreement and the services performed hereunder. In addition to and independent from the above, Contractor shall at Contractor’s expense secure insurance coverage through an insurance company or companies duly licensed and authorized to conduct insurance business in Montana which insures the liabilities and obligations specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. The insurance coverage shall not contain any exclusion for liabilities specifically assumed by the Contractor in this Section. 85 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 6 of 14 The insurance shall cover and apply to all claims, demands, suits, damages, losses, and expenses that may be asserted or claimed against, recovered from, or suffered by the City without limit and without regard to the cause therefore and which is acceptable to the City. Contractor shall furnish to the City an accompanying certificate of insurance and accompanying endorsements in amounts not less than as follows: • Workers’ Compensation – statutory; • Employers’ Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; • Commercial General Liability - $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate; • Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 property damage/bodily injury per accident; and • Professional Liability - $1,000,000 per claim; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The above amounts shall be exclusive of defense costs. The City shall be endorsed as an additional or named insured on a primary non-contributory basis on the Commercial General, Employer’s Liability, and Automobile Liability policies. The insurance and required endorsements must be in a form suitable to City and shall include no less than a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Contractor shall notify City within two (2) business days of Contractor’s receipt of notice that any required insurance coverage will be terminated or Contractor’s decision to terminate any required insurance coverage for any reason. The City must approve all insurance coverage and endorsements prior to the Contractor commencing work. 8. Termination for Contractor’s Fault: a. If Contractor refuses or fails to timely do the work, or any part thereof, or fails to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or otherwise breaches any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the City may, by written notice, terminate this Agreement and the Contractor’s right to proceed with all or any part of the work (“Termination Notice Due to Contractor’s Fault”). The City may then take over the work and complete it, either with its own resources or by re-letting the contract to any other third party. b. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 8, Contractor shall be entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered. c. Any termination provided for by this Section 8 shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled under the law or at equity. 86 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 7 of 14 d. In the event of termination under this Section 8, Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 9. Termination for City’s Convenience: a. Should conditions arise which, in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, make it advisable to the City to cease performance under this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Contractor (“Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience”). The termination shall be effective in the manner specified in the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience and shall be without prejudice to any claims that the City may otherwise have against Contractor. b. Upon receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience, unless otherwise directed in the Notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease performance under this Agreement and make every reasonable effort to refrain from continuing work, incurring additional expenses or costs under this Agreement and shall immediately cancel all existing orders or contracts upon terms satisfactory to the City. Contractor shall do only such work as may be necessary to preserve, protect, and maintain work already completed or immediately in progress. c. In the event of a termination pursuant to this Section 9, Contractor is entitled to payment only for those services Contractor actually rendered on or before the receipt of the Notice of Termination for City’s Convenience. d. The compensation described in Section 9(c) is the sole compensation due to Contractor for its performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall, under no circumstances, be entitled to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits damages of any nature arising, or claimed to have arisen, as a result of the termination. 10. Limitation on Contractor’s Damages; Time for Asserting Claim: a. In the event of a claim for damages by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor’s damages shall be limited to contract damages and Contractor hereby expressly waives any right to claim or recover consequential, special, punitive, lost business opportunity, lost productivity, field office overhead, general conditions costs, or lost profits 87 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 8 of 14 damages of any nature or kind. b.In the event Contractor wants to assert a claim for damages of any kind or nature, Contractor shall provide City with written notice of its claim, the facts and circumstances surrounding and giving rise to the claim, and the total amount of damages sought by the claim, within thirty (30) days of the facts and circumstances giving rise to the claim. In the event Contractor fails to provide such notice, Contractor shall waive all rights to assert such claim. 11.Representatives and Notices: a.City’s Representative: The City’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be __Nicholas Focken, Parking Manager__ or such other individual as City shall designate in writing. Whenever approval or authorization from or communication or submission to City is required by this Agreement, such communication or submission shall be directed to the City’s Representative and approvals or authorizations shall be issued only by such Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when City’s Representative is not available, Contractor may direct its communication or submission to other designated City personnel or agents as designated by the City in writing and may receive approvals or authorization from such persons. b.Contractor’s Representative: The Contractor’s Representative for the purpose of this Agreement shall be 88 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 9 of 14 89 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 10 of 14 __Aimee Smith ___ or such other individual as Contractor shall designate in writing. Whenever direction to or communication with Contractor is required by this Agreement, such direction or communication shall be directed to Contractor’s Representative; provided, however, that in exigent circumstances when Contractor’s Representative is not available, City may direct its direction or communication to other designated Contractor personnel or agents. c. Notices: All notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided to the Representatives named in this Section. Notices shall be deemed given when delivered, if delivered by courier to Party’s address shown above during normal business hours of the recipient; or when sent, if sent by email or fax (with a successful transmission report) to the email address or fax number provided by the Party’s Representative; or on the fifth business day following mailing, if mailed by ordinary mail to the address shown above, postage prepaid. 12.Permits: Contractor shall provide all notices, comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, including a City of Bozeman business license, and inspections from applicable governmental authorities, and pay all fees and charges in connection therewith. 13.Laws and Regulations: Contractor shall comply fully with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and municipal ordinances including, but not limited to, all workers’ compensation laws, all environmental laws including, but not limited to, the generation and disposal of hazardous waste, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), the safety rules, codes, and provisions of the Montana Safety Act in Title 50, Chapter 71, MCA, all applicable City, County, and State building and electrical codes, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and all non-discrimination, affirmative action, and utilization of minority and small business statutes and regulations. If Contractor’s Scope of Services includes the production of digital content, documents, or web applications intended to be branded for use by the City, Contractor must use the City style guide when creating a design. As per recommendations found in Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, all digital content, documents, or web applications must also adhere to level A and AA Success Criteria and Conformance Requirements as defined by the current Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). The City will not accept digital content that does not comply with WCAG A and AA guidelines. If the City refuses digital content because it is non-compliant with the City style guide, Section 508 of 90 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 11 of 14 the Rehabilitation Act, and/or WCAG, Contractor will be required to make the digital content compliant and redelivered at no additional cost to the City. 15. Nondiscrimination and Equal Pay: The Contractor agrees that all hiring by Contractor of persons performing this Agreement shall be on the basis of merit and qualifications. The Contractor will have a policy to provide equal employment opportunity in accordance with all applicable state and federal anti-discrimination laws, regulations, and contracts. The Contractor will not refuse employment to a person, bar a person from employment, or discriminate against a person in compensation or in a term, condition, or privilege of employment because of race, color, religion, creed, political ideas, sex, age, marital status, national origin, actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, physical or mental disability, except when the reasonable demands of the position require an age, physical or mental disability, marital status or sex distinction. The Contractor shall be subject to and comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 140, Title 2, United States Code, and all regulations promulgated thereunder. Contractor represents it is, and for the term of this Agreement will be, in compliance with the requirements of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Section 39-3-104, MCA (the Montana Equal Pay Act). Contractor must report to the City any violations of the Montana Equal Pay Act that Contractor has been found guilty of within 60 days of such finding for violations occurring during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall require these nondiscrimination terms of its subcontractors providing services under this Agreement. 16. Intoxicants; DOT Drug and Alcohol Regulations/Safety and Training: Contractor shall not permit or suffer the introduction or use of any intoxicants, including alcohol or illegal drugs, by any employee or agent engaged in services to the City under this Agreement while on City property or in the performance of any activities under this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges it is aware of and shall comply with its responsibilities and obligations under the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations governing anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention plans and related testing. City shall have the right to request proof of such compliance and Contractor shall be obligated to furnish such proof. The Contractor shall be responsible for instructing and training the Contractor's employees and agents in proper and specified work methods and procedures. The Contractor shall provide continuous inspection and supervision of the work performed. The Contractor is responsible for instructing its employees and agents in safe work practices. 91 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 12 of 14 17. Modification and Assignability: This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except by written agreement signed by both parties hereto. The Contractor may not subcontract or assign Contractor’s rights, including the right to compensation or duties arising hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Any subcontractor or assignee will be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 18. Reports/Accountability/Public Information: Contractor agrees to develop and/or provide documentation as requested by the City demonstrating Contractor’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. Contractor shall allow the City, its auditors, and other persons authorized by the City to inspect and copy its books and records for the purpose of verifying that the reimbursement of monies distributed to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement was used in compliance with this Agreement and all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law. The Contractor shall not issue any statements, releases or information for public dissemination without prior approval of the City. 19. Non-Waiver: A waiver by either party of any default or breach by the other party of any terms or conditions of this Agreement does not limit the other party’s right to enforce such term or conditions or to pursue any available legal or equitable rights in the event of any subsequent default or breach. 20. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: In the event it becomes necessary for either Party to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to give any notice required herein, then the prevailing Party or the Party giving notice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including the City Attorney’s Office staff. 21. Taxes: Contractor is obligated to pay all taxes of any kind or nature and make all appropriate employee withholdings. 22. Dispute Resolution: a. Any claim, controversy, or dispute between the parties, their agents, employees, or representatives shall be resolved first by negotiation between senior-level personnel from each party duly authorized to execute settlement agreements. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the parties may invite an independent, disinterested mediator to assist in the negotiated settlement discussions. b. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the dispute was first raised, then such dispute may only be resolved in a court of 92 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 13 of 14 competent jurisdiction in compliance with the Applicable Law provisions of this Agreement. 23. Survival: Contractor’s indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for the maximum period allowed under applicable law. 24. Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not be construed as a part of the Agreement or as a limitation on the scope of the particular paragraphs to which they refer. 25.Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is held to be void or unenforceable, the balance thereof shall continue in effect. 26.Applicable Law: The parties agree that this Agreement is governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Montana. 27.Binding Effect: This Agreement is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties. 28.No Third-Party Beneficiary: This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties, does not constitute a third-party beneficiary agreement, and may not be relied upon or enforced by a third party. 29.Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which together constitute one instrument. 30. Integration: This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement of the parties. Covenants or representations not contained herein or made a part thereof by reference, are not binding upon the parties. There are no understandings between the parties other than as set forth in this Agreement. All communications, either verbal or written, made prior to the date of this Agreement are hereby abrogated and withdrawn unless specifically made a part of this Agreement by reference. 31.Consent to Electronic Signatures: The Parties have consented to execute this Agreement electronically in conformance with the Montana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 30, Chapter 18, Part 1, MCA. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 93 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 14 of 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written or as recorded in an electronic signature. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA ________Apex Group Inc. ____________ CONTRACTOR (Type Name Above) By________________________________ By__________________________________ Chuck Winn , Interim City Manager Print Name: ___________________________ Print Title: ____________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 94 Professional Services Agreement for Rouse Lot Repair Page 1 of 14 Exhibit A 95 ASPHALT A Higher Standard 96 Nic FockenTO PROPOSAL: 315 E Babcock MT 59715Bozeman 07/31/2424-25304-P SITE: nfocken@bozeman.net 406-581-6570PCF PROPOSAL 30 Years of Experience www.apexgroupmt.com “A Higher Standard” PARKING LOT PAVING $60,000.00SubTotal Price Our Price Includes: 1. Saw Cutting (if required) 2. Excavation, haul off and disposal of existing asphalt surfacing. (price assumes an industry standard average asphalt thickness of 3 inches. If existing asphalt is thicker additional charges may apply) 3. Grading and compaction of existing base materials.(If unsuitable base material is discovered after asphalt is removed work will be stopped until such time as a change in price can be negotiated for extra work) 4. Tack coating of all edges abutting new asphalt to provide bond between old and new pavement. 5. Installation and compaction of 3 inch thick asphalt to approximately 15,000 square feet. Additional square footage to be billed at our “price per square foot” based on this proposal. NOTE: 2 Year Warranty! (Subject to conditions and exclusions listed in this document) • Remove & Replace.60,000.00 STRIPE $2,500.00SubTotal Price Our Price Includes: 1. Layout(if required) 2. Stripe existing parking lines or as outlined in the plans. 3. Paint ADA lines and stencils. 4. Paint stencils as per existing or as outlined in the plans. • STRIPING OF PARKING LOT.2,500.00 Proposal Total Price 62,500.00Terms: Payment is due upon completion of work. All returned checks will be charged an additional $25.00. Major credit cards accepted. Use of credit or debit card is subject up to 3% surcharge fee. Sales Tax Rates may vary.Acceptance: The process, speciHications, and conditions as enumerated herein, including “Terms and Conditions” below are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Apex Group, Inc. is authorized to proceed with the work as speciHied. Payment will be made according to the terms listed above. Apex Group, Inc., reserves the right to Hile a preliminary lien notice if required. This proposal is valid for 30 days from the date of the proposal. Due to volatile material pricing, all work is subject to an increase if it is not completed within 30 days from the date of this proposal. Authorized Signature______________________________ Title______________________________________ Print Name______________________________________ Date______________________________________ Legal Property Owner _____________________________ Email Address______________________________ Mailing Address __________________________________ Contact Phone______________________________ Accounts payable email (if different from contact email)____________________________ See additional warranty/exclusions information following this proposal: Page 1 5961 Kessler Lane • Belgrade, MT 59714 • Phone: 406-388-7044/Fax 388-0778 www.ApexGroupmt.com 97 � 98 Specific E[clXsions & WarranWies A HLgKeU SWaQdaUd Paving Warranty and Exclusions: Warranty on paving is 2 Years except for the following exclusions: Proper drainage for any paving project is guaranteed only if a minimum of 2% for every 1/4 inch per foot exist prior to paving. Pooling or drainage issues may exist if minimum slope can’t be achieved due to onsite conditions. Apex Group, Inc. will not be responsible if standing water and/or icing exists after paving work is completed. If any portion of the new pavement fails due to poor, inadequate, and/or base materials (sub-grade materials such as pit run, not road mix used from final grade) installed by others there will be no warranty on the failed areas. Sterilization of the ground will only be completed if weeds are present on the surface to be paved prior to preparation work being completed. In no case will Apex Group, Inc. be responsible if weeds grow through the asphalt surface after paving. Apex Group Inc. is not responsible for items typical of asphalt pavement such as cracking, settling, oxidation, edge deterioration and breakage, rutting, uneven surface and or appearance from rocks when hand raking takes place, scuff marks from power steering, softness at higher temperatures, visible seams, tracking, etc. If an asphalt overlay is completed there are no warranties on drainage. If it’s required that we cross over or pave next to any type of concrete border, concrete sidewalk, concrete apron or concrete of any kind we are not responsible for any damage that may occur including, but not limited to cracking, discoloration, breakage, scuffing, staining or damage of any kind. This includes tire marks etc. Our total tonnage for road mix is based on proper elevation of the sub grade and is an estimate only. Pricing for this item takes into account the mobilization of our prep crew to the job site and our time to prep the project. A decrease in our import material does not decrease the pricing unless an agreement is made prior to our mobilization to the job site. Generally speaking if we have to mobilize our prep crew to the site there will be no decrease. Concrete Exclusions: Any and all winter conditions, constructions staking, pump trucks, cold weather concrete and/or protection, hot water, chemicals,blanketing, concrete testing or any kind of ground thawing setup or equipment. Pricing assumes prep work will be completed to within plus or minus 1”. No gravel included unless specified. Light towers to be provided by others for night work, no heat tubing work included (plumber must be onsite for each pour) No extra labor included for slick lining, no haul off of wash out materials, no special curing or hardeners included, no color, stain or stamp work included unless specified, safety railing by others. Insulation and/or vapor barrier by others, unless specified. Pricing based on exact quantities as listed in the attached estimate. The estimated quantities and exclusions to be made part of any subcontract agreement. Water and Sewer Exclusions: Unless specified in estimate all excavation for water and sewer pricing assumes that work will be completed in unfrozen ground. Ȉ Pricing for excavation is based on favorable working conditions. Ȉ If conditions such as rock formations, high water table or any other unforeseen problems requiring additional materials, time or labor, the customer will be notified and any additional costs will be added to the invoice. Ȉ Unless specified, water and sewer price does not include any fees or permits that may be required for hookup. Ȉ Cutting of asphalt or concrete and or associated patching or repairs where street cuts are required will be an extra charge unless they are specified in our estimate. Ȉ Apex Group, Inc. does not assume responsibility for any utility lines such as water, electric, gas, phone, fiber optic, sprinkler, etc. which may lie within eighteen inches (18”) of the surface. Layouts of locations must be furnished to Apex Group, Inc. if such lines are known to exist. In no case shall Apex Group, Inc. be responsible for damage to any of the above. Ȉ Bedding material is not included in our water and sewer pricing unless specified as a separate line item in our estimate. Ȉ Other Exclusions Include: Haul off, temporary barricade & fencing, dust control, road sweeping, unforeseen below ground demolition, topsoil import, irrigation & landscaping, layout, interior pipe work, hazardous and/or contaminated waste excavation or removal, soils testing, and bonds. C”ack Seal Wa””a–›ǣ There is no warranty on crack sealing unless the cracks are routed to a width and depth of ¾ inches and then sealed with the hot rubberized crack sealer. Ȉ Cracks that run parallel to the edges of asphalt will not be sealed. Ȉ Cracks between asphalt and concrete surfaces will not be sealed unless specifically outlined in the proposal. Ȉ Alligator areas and/or areas that need to be patched will not be crack sealed. Ȉ Settling of hot or cold applied crack sealers will occur if cracks are more than 1/4 inch wide and 1/4 inch deep. Settling of the hot crack sealer is no call for alarm. The crack remains sealed even if the sealant is not completely to the top of the crack. 99 Sealcoating Warranty and Exclusions: The Work proposed herein is covered by a 2 year warranty on workmanship for asphalt sealing. Application of all warranty provisions is conditional upon full payment of contract price as specified in this agreement. Normal wear and tear, abuse, accidental damage and acts of God are excluded as well as areas that have oil and gas drippings, low spots that hold water, areas where snow is piled or extremely dirty areas. Other items that will void the warranty on seal coating are: salting, sanding or use of deicing products such as magnesium chloride during the winter season. Common Questions and Concerns: 1. When cars turn their power steering on fresh seal coat you will notice marks that appear to be tearing the asphalt emulsion. Because asphalt takes up to 6 weeks to cure, it remains soft when temperatures are hot. The power steering marks may continue for several weeks until the emulsion in the seal coat hardens. 2. You may notice small hairline cracks that develop in the seal coat, especially where the asphalt is rough or where cracks have been sealed. This is a normal asphalt emulsion trait where the sealer is thick. The asphalt emulsion contains some water and as that water evaporates you may develop shrinkage cracks. 3. If your asphalt surface has poor drainage and puddles of water exist, you may notice that the seal coat didn’t bond well in those areas after the first winter. This is caused by freezing and thawing of the water in those areas. Ideally the low spots should be repaired prior to seal coating. Additional Notes: Asphalt sealing proposal is based on a square foot price that includes a google earth photo (if available) of the existing asphalt surface area. If the area has been modified and/or increased in total square footage an additional charge will apply based on our square foot price. S–”i’ig Ešcl—•i‘• ad N‘–e•ǣ Sweeping of parking lot, curb painting, bollard, pole or parking bumper painting. Re-striped stencils may not be an exact patch if Apex Group Inc. didn’t do the initial striping. The moving of vehicles etc. is the responsibility of the owner. If additional mobilizations are required due to vehicles in our way, an extra charge will apply. Pa–chig Wa””a–› ad Ešcl—•i‘•ǣ Warranty on patching is 2 years except for the following exclusions: Proper drainage for any patching project is guaranteed only if a minimum of 2% for every 1/4 inch per foot exist prior to paving. Pooling of drainage issues may exist if minimum slope can’t be achieved due to onsite conditions. Apex Group Inc. will not be responsible if standing water and/or icing exists after patching work is completed. Id any portion of the new pavement fails due to poor, inadequate and/or base materials (sub-grade materials such as pit run, not road mix used from final grade) installed by others, there will be no warranty on failed areas. In no case will Apex Group Inc. be responsible if weeds grow through the asphalt surface after paving. Apex Group Inc. is not responsible for items typical of asphalt pavement such as cracking, settling, oxidation, edge deterioration and breakage, rutting, uneven surface and or appearance from rocks when hand raking takes place, scuff marks from power steering, softness at higher temperatures, visible seams, tracking, etc. if it’s required that we cross over or pave next to any type of concrete border, concrete sidewalk, concrete apron or concrete of any kind, we are not responsible for any damage that may occur including, but not limited to cracking, discoloration, breakage, scuffing, staining or damage of any kind. This includes tire marks etc. 100 Standard Conditions/Warranties A Higher Standard General Conditions: •This proposal is valid for 14 days, with 4inal acceptance subject to approval by the credit department of Apex Group, Inc. and if executed by “customer” as a contract, is entered into by Apex Group, Inc. without liability for delay or cancellation from causes beyond Apex’s control, including weather, acts of God, labor disturbances, shortages, war and acts of government. • All surfaces to which material is to be applied shall be in a condition that is similar to the time at which the project was bid. Customer shall notify Apex Group in advance when the site is ready for the work to be performed, and shall give free and unobstructed access so that the work to be performed can be commenced promptly, and that once begun, may be completed without delay. Customer agrees to pay Apex Group, Inc. its reasonable charges for delays caused by customer or other subcontractors. Towing of vehicles, if necessary, shall be the responsibility of the customer. • Traf4ic control will be provided by customer unless otherwise speci4ied in estimate. It shall be the responsibility of the customer to maintain closures if required. • A water supply source shall be furnished by the customer. If Apex Group, Inc. has to bring their own water source an additional charge will apply. • Apex Group, Inc. does not assume responsibility for any utility lines such as water, electric, sprinkler, etc. which may lie within eighteen inches (18”) of the surface. Layouts of locations must be furnished to Apex Group, Inc. if such lines are known to exist. In no case shall Apex Group, Inc. be responsible for damage to any of the above. • Additional work can be performed either by verbal or written order by the owner or owners representative. Terms: •In addition to the terms and conditions listed in this estimate, customer agrees to pay a service charge of 2% per month on all accounts that are more than 5 days past due. Customer agrees to pay all reasonable attorney, collection and/or lien 4iling fees that may be incurred. • Customers agrees that payment us due in full at the time the services are provided. Indemni3ication: •Apex Group, Inc. maintains adequate insurance and shall indemnify and hold harmless customer, owner, agents and employees of any of them from any claims, damages, losses and expenses arising out of or resulting from performance of the work to the extent caused by the negligent acts or omissions of Apex Group, Inc. or anyone for whose acts Apex Group, Inc. may be liable. Disputes:•If customer objects to any portion of the work, customer shall pay Apex Group, Inc. as per this agreement and notify Apex Group, Inc. within 7 calendar days, identify the cause of the disagreement. • The parties hereby agree that, in any legal action arising from this agreement, venue for the action may properly be placed in the county of the Apex Group, Inc. of4ice that issued this proposal and contract. • The parties acknowledge that they are hereby relinquishing and waiving any rights they may have to establishing venue in any other county. This agreement shall be in accordance with and governed by the laws of the state in which it was drafted. Our Environmental Commitment:•Apex Group, Inc. believes in employing sustainable practices that are both socially responsible and commercially sound. From material recycling strategies to pollution prevention initiatives, we are committed to minimizing our environmental impact while improving the well being of the communities we serve. Con3identiality:•The information in this document is privileged and completely con4idential. No part of this document may be reproduced and/or distributed to anyone other than the recipient that is speci4ically listed on this document without the written permission from Apex Group, Inc. 101 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Brit Fontenot, Director of Economic Development SUBJECT:Authorize the City Manager to Sign Amendment Three to the Professional Services Agreement with KLJ Engineering for the Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge. MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Agreement - Vendor/Contract RECOMMENDATION:Authorize the City Manager to Sign Amendment Three to the Professional Services Agreement with KLJ Engineering for the Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge. STRATEGIC PLAN:2.2 Infrastructure Investments: Strategically invest in infrastructure as a mechanism to encourage economic development. BACKGROUND:On December 8, 2020 the City Commission authorized the original professional services agreement with KLJ engineering for the completion of the design for the Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge. Since that time, the design work has been completed and the project is moving forward into construction. The Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge will improve non-motorized vehicle and pedestrian connectivity in the Northeast Neighborhood and further encourage bike and pedestrian traffic throughout the area. Construction for the project was originally bid on October 24, 2022, and awarded June 12, 2023. Due to mounting costs, the City elected to change the bridge superstructure from a customized piece to a prefabricated 10 ft x 45 ft steel bridge with a timber deck. To date, two change orders have been issued to the Contractor for this project. Change Order 1 changed the bridge superstructure and was approved January 23, 2024. Change Order 2 updated the remaining bid item pricing and was approved on July 9, 2024. KLJ was previously contracted to complete a portion of the design along with the construction administration and observation. The attached scope outlines the tasks required to redesign the abutments to accommodate a the new prefabricated 10 ft x 45 ft steel bridge with a timber deck (change orders 1 & 2), along with the anticipated construction administration and observation efforts. 102 The Aspen Street Bridge construction is slated to begin in September of 2024. This amendment reflects additional duties for the final stages of the contract as outlined in the attached scope of work. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None at this time. ALTERNATIVES:As recommended by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:The contract amendment adds up to an additional $38,667 to the contract. The amount will be covered by the available cash in the Northeast Urban Renewal District fund. Attachments: 24- Amendment 3 to PSA with KLJ for Aspen Street Ped Bridge with attachments.pdf Report compiled on: August 13, 2024 103 3rd Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge Page 1 of 2 THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS 1ST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR Engineering services for an Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge dated December 8, 2020 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 13th day of August, 2024, by and between the CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, a self governing municipal corporation organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Montana, 121 North Rouse Street, Bozeman, Montana, with a mailing address of PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771, hereinafter referred to as “City,” and KLJ Engineering, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Addition to Scope of Work. This amendment will expand the scope of work for this contract to include services related to providing construction phase services as outlined in the scope of work attached as Exhibit A. 2. Addition to payment. See Exhibit A for fee proposal for services to be provided. 3. Agreement still valid. All remaining terms and provisions of the Agreement remain valid. **** END OF AGREEMENT EXCEPT FOR SIGNATURES **** 104 3rd Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge Page 2 of 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument the day and year first above written. CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA KLJ ENGINEERING By________________________________ By_____________________________ Chuck Winn, City Manager Mark Anderson Senior Vice President Public Works APPROVED AS TO FORM By_______________________________ Greg Sullivan, Bozeman City Attorney 105 Exhibit A – Scope of Services Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES Engineering Services for East Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge Purpose The purpose if this Exhibit is to rescope the East Aspen Street Pedestrian Bridge project. The project was originally bid October 24, 2022, and awarded June 12, 2023. The city has elected to change the Bridge Superstructure to a prefabricated 10 ft x 45 ft steel bridge with a timber deck. With this change, two change orders have been issued to the Contractor. Change order 1 changed the Bridge Superstructure and was approved January 23, 2024. Change order 2 updating the remaining bid item prices was approved July 9, 2024. Upon execution of the two change orders, the contractor has the required approvals to proceed with construction in 2024. Per discussions with the Contractor construction is anticipated to begin in September 2024 to be completed no later than the updated completion date of December 31, 2024. KLJ was previously contracted to complete a portion of the design along with the construction administration and observation. The Bridge Superstructure and Custom Fence included in the October 24, 2022 bid opening was designed by others. This scope outlines the tasks required to redesign the abutments to accommodate a prefabricated 10 ft x 45 ft steel bridge with a timber deck (change orders 1 & 2), along with the anticipated construction administration and observation efforts. Attached is an updated scheduled comparing the actual redesign to the schedule discussed January 23, 2024 with the City. Design Engineering - $38,667 Permits – KLJ covered cost KLJ has secured USACE and DEQ permits and is working with the City to revise the floodplain permit approved February 7, 2024. • USACE permit NWO-2023-01524-MT approved January 5, 2024 will be sufficient and not require additional submittals or approvals by USACE. • MT DEQ permit MTB013360 approved November 8, 2023 will be sufficient and not require additional submittals or approvals by MT DEQ. • Gallatin County floodplain permit letter dated February 7, 2024 will be revised to include the prefab steel bridge superstructure. KLJ provided an updated certification letter to the City on July 15, 2024. In addition, KLJ provided the City design calculations and drawings from the fabricator on July 17, 2024. KLJ assumes the information submitted will be sufficient to secure a revised floodplain permit and no other submittals or approvals will be required. 106 Exhibit A – Scope of Services Page 2 of 5 Design Calculations KLJ will perform tasks associated with the design of the new structure components. The following tasks are included in the design calculations: • Finalize Bridge Layout • Finalize Path Layout • Abutment Walls • Abutment Foundations • Signe/Sealed Superstructure Calculations (From Supplier) • Signed/Sealed Superstructure Shop Drawings (From Supplier) • One (1) Construction Easement Exhibit • Remove Riprap Quantity • Remove Sidewalk Quantity • Quantity Calculations • Independent Check • Custom Fence designed by others to remain the same with exceptions noted in change order 2. Preliminary Plans KLJ will continue with preliminary plans dated May 10, 2021 to complete design for the new superstructure. Plan preparation will include the design calculations, drafting and engineering review for the following: • Bridge Layout • Plan Notes • Basis of Estimate • Quantities • Superstructure (From Supplier) • Substructure • Engineer’s Estimate Deliverables KLJ will conduct in-depth quality reviews to all plans, specifications and special provisions. Reviews will be completed prior to plan submittals. KLJ will assemble and distribute plans and estimate at 90% completion for review by the City. Final Plans – Revision and Submittal Revisions from the client review will be incorporated into the final plans. The final plans submittal will include the signed/sealed plans and specifications. The submittal will also include signed/sealed calculations and shop drawings provided by the truss supplier. 107 Exhibit A – Scope of Services Page 3 of 5 Opinion of Cost KLJ will develop the engineer’s opinion of cost for submittal to the City. Temporary Construction Easement Plat – KLJ covered cost KLJ will develop and submit one (1) signed/sealed temporary construction easement plat for the City to negotiate and secure the temporary construction easement. Change Orders KLJ will develop two (2) change orders, one for the Superstructure and one for the updated contractor estimate. Custom Fence Upon execution of change order 2, the City was still looking at options for the custom fence. Per discussions with the Contractor, the City needs to decide how to proceed no later than July 26, 2024. Milestones January 23, 2024, Change Order 1 Approved April 19, 2024, KLJ Provided City with Signed & Sealed Temporary Construction Easement Exhibit May 2, 2024, KLJ Signed & Sealed Updated Plan Sheets May 3, 2024, KLJ Submitted Signed & Sealed Updated Plan Sheets to City May 14, 2024, KLJ Submitted Signed & Sealed Updated Plan Sheets to Contractor July 3, 2024, Bridge Superstructure Fabrication Complete (Per Contractor) July 8, 2024, City Acquired Temporary Construction Easement July 9, 2024, Change Order 2 Approved July 15, 2024, KLJ provided an updated floodplain certification letter to the City. July 17, 2024, KLJ provided fabricator prefab bridge design calculations and drawings to the City. July 26, 2024, Deadline for City to decide on Custom Fence September 2024 Anticipated Construction Construction Engineering KLJ is not requesting additional budget for Construction Engineering. The Construction Engineering scope will be covered in the budget approved March 21, 2023. The purpose of this section is to rescope Construction Engineering based on the design changes. 108 Exhibit A – Scope of Services Page 4 of 5 Exclusions KLJ and our subconsultants are not responsible for the Contractor’s safety procedures or operations. This scope of service does not include any safety inspections of the Contractor’s equipment, procedures, or operations. In addition, KLJ and our subconsultants are not responsible for the safety of City personnel, site visitors, Contractor’s personnel, subcontractor’s personnel, or any other personnel. KLJ and our subconsultants will not proceed with their duties in areas or situations deemed unsafe or hazardous to KLJ or our subconsultants staff due to the Contractor’s non-conformance with OSHA or other agency safety regulations. KLJ and our subconsultants will not assume the duties and responsibilities of the Contractor, or its Subcontractors, including but not limited to, determining or performing construction procedures, techniques and means and methods. Construction Administration KLJ will provide project construction administration for the project and provide overall coordination of the work completed by the KLJ construction engineering team. The work shall consist of managing work assignments, internal team and safety meetings, client coordination, subconsultant coordination, plan and specification interpretation, administering requests for information from the Contractor and monitoring KLJ’s project budget and schedule. KLJ and our subconsultants will prepare for, attend, and participate in a pre-construction conference. KLJ assumes the pre-construction will be in person at City Hall. Construction Observation KLJ will provide project construction observation for the project. Task includes time to measure, track, and documents quantities related to the bid items along with reviewing and submitting contractor pay estimates. KLJ assumes the following: • One (1) on site staff for no more than 120 hours over eight (8) weeks. • Contractor will not work full-time over the eight (8) weeks. • KLJ will be on site full time during the excavation, placement, and backfilling the abutments and the placement of the bridge superstructure. Otherwise, KLJ will be on site as needed. 109 Exhibit A – Scope of Services Page 5 of 5 • If the Contractor elects to precast the abutments, the Contractor or Manufacturer will be allowed to submit a certification (discussed with the city) self-certifying the abutments were constructed as designed. KLJ will not be responsible for off-site construction observations. • There are two (2) trees within the work zone that will need to be removed. Possibly a 3rd tree that might inhibit access. The City’s Forestry Division can help with trimming to facilitate with crane setup. There is one (1) large cottonwood tree with branches out over the street, and the maple in the front yard which extends over the street as well. Construction Staking KLJ will provide project construction staking for the project. KLJ assumes the following: • KLJ will mobilize to the site two (2) times to complete survey tasks. • KLJ will stake offsets for proposed abutment locations. • KLJ will be able to complete the remaining staking with no more than one (2) two-man survey crews on site. • Scope does not include time for project topo, project re-cross, or CAD calculations if the Engineer and Contractor do not agree to quantities. • KLJ will require the Contractor to submit written survey requests. KLJ will consider re-staking as out of scope work and will track the associated costs. Material Testing KLJ will subcontract Western Materials Testing to provide material testing services. Contract Summary Agreement Date Amount 12/8/2020 $14,950.00 8/23/2022 $14,260.20 3/21/2023 $37,900.00 Previously Approved $67,065.20 Current Amendment $38,667.00 New Contract Amount $105,732.20 110 Activity ID Activity Name Original Duration Start Finish Aspen Street ScheduleAspen Street Schedule 261 Sep-08-23 A Sep-09-24 PermitsPermits 246 Sep-08-23 A Jul-31-24 1000 KLJ Submit USACE 404 Permit 0 Sep-08-23 A 1010 KLJ Submit Floodplain Permit 0 Sep-08-23 A 1020 KLJ Submit DEQ 813 Permit 0 Sep-08-23 A 1030 DEQ Review Permit 44 Sep-08-23 A Nov-08-23 A 1040 USACE Assinged Project Number NOW-2023-01524-MT 21 Sep-08-23 A Oct-06-23 A O1100 Gallatin County Review Floodplain Permit 12 Sep-20-23 A Feb-07-24 A O1090 KLJ Provide Memo 0 Sep-20-23 A 1050 KLJ Paid Floodplain Permit Fee 1 Oct-05-23 A Oct-05-23 A 1060 USACE Review 404 Permit 53 Oct-09-23 A Jan-05-24 A 1070 DEQ Approve 318 Permit (Expires 1year)0 Nov-08-23 A 1110 USACE Approve 404 Permit (Expires 1year)0 Jan-05-24 A O1120 Gallatin County Approve Floodplain Permit (Expires 1year)0 Feb-07-24 A 1080 KLJ Provide Stamped Plans 0 May-03-24 A 1090 KLJ Provide Memo (Revised)0 Jul-15-24 A 1100 Gallatin County Review Floodplain Permit 12 Jul-16-24 A Jul-31-24 1120 Gallatin County Approve Floodplain Permit (Revised) (Expires 1year)0 Jul-31-24 RedesignRedesign 186 Dec-22-23 A Sep-09-24 2000 City Confirmation to Proceed 0 Dec-22-23 A 2010 KLJ Prepare Change Order 1 13 Dec-22-23 A Jan-09-24 A 2020 City Review Change Order 1 10 Jan-10-24 A Jan-23-24 A 2030 Fully Executed Change Order 1 0 Jan-23-24 A 2040 KLJ Receive Calcs and Shop Drawings from True North 25 Jan-24-24 A Feb-27-24 A 2050 KLJ PS&E Sidewalk Plans, Specs, Notes 68 Feb-27-24 A May-05-24 A 2070 KLJ Draft Construction Easement Plat 52 Feb-27-24 A Apr-19-24 A 2060 KLJ PS&E Abutment Plans, Specs, Notes 68 Feb-27-24 A May-05-24 A 2080 KLJ Review True North Calcs & Shop Drawings 3 Feb-28-24 A Mar-01-24 A 2090 KLJ Accept True North Calcs & Shop Drawings 0 Mar-01-24 A 2110 True North Fabricate Structure 119 Mar-04-24 A Jul-01-24 A 2120 KLJ Provide City Stamped Construction Easement Plat 0 Apr-19-24 A 2130 City Secure Construction Easement 80 Apr-19-24 A Jul-08-24 A 2170 KLJ Stamp Final Plans, Specs, Notes 1 May-02-24 A May-02-24 A 2140 City PS&E Review 7 May-03-24 A May-13-24 A 2160 City Plan Approval 5 May-13-24 A May-13-24 A 2150 KLJ Address City Review Comments 10 May-13-24 A May-13-24 A 2180 Blanton Cost Estimate 27 May-14-24 A Jun-20-24 A 2190 KLJ Prepare Change Order 2 26 Jun-20-24 A Jun-28-24 A 2200 City Review Change Order 2 9 Jul-01-24 A Jul-09-24 A 2210 Fully Executed Change Order 2 0 Jul-09-24 A 2220 Blanton Order Abutments 1 Jul-16-24 A Jul-16-24 A 2230 Glacier Precast Cast/Cure Abutments 53 Jul-16-24 A Sep-07-24 2100 Blanton Order Structure 1 Jul-17-24 Jul-17-24 2240 Ready for Construction 0 Sep-09-24 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Qtr 4, 2023 Qtr 1, 2024 Qtr 2, 2024 Qtr 3, 2024 Qtr 4, 2024  Aspen Street Schedule  Page 1 of 1 Status as of 7-17-2024 111 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Bernie Massey, Assistant Treasurer Laurae Clark, Treasurer Melissa Hodnett, Finance Director SUBJECT:Resolution 5619 Creation of Special Improvement Lighting District 786 Urban + Farm Phase 1 MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Resolution RECOMMENDATION:Adopt Commission Resolution No. 5619 Creation of Special Improvement Lighting District 786 Urban + Farm Subdivision Phase 1 STRATEGIC PLAN:7.5. Funding and Delivery of City Services: Use equitable and sustainable sources of funding for appropriate City services, and deliver them in a lean and efficient manner. BACKGROUND:The Commission did on August 6, 2024, adopt Commission Resolution No. 5616 Intent to Create Special Improvement Lighting District 786 Urban + Farm Subdivision Phase 1 as per MCA 7-12-4301. The property owner has been noticed of the public hearing on this date. Creating a lighting district is a requirement of final plat approval. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:As a result of creating this lighting district, the City will pay the associated power bills and schedule system maintenance. We will recover these costs by billing property owners each year on their City Assessment bill. It is estimated to cost $49.46 per acre within the district or $208.42 annually for the entire district. Attachments: Resolution 5619-Creation of SILD 786.doc Report compiled on: July 23, 2024 112 Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION 5619 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, RELATING TO LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 786 URBAN + FARM PHASE 1 CREATING THE DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSING THE COSTS OF MAINTENANCE AND ENERGY THEREFOR TO BENEFITTED PROPERTY BY THE LEVY OF SPECIALASSESSMENT. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission (the “Commission”) of the City of Bozeman, Montana (the “City”), as follows: Section 1 Passage of Resolution of Intention. This Commission, on August 6, 2024, adopted Resolution No. 5618 (the “Resolution of Intention”), pursuant to which this Commission declared its intention to create a special lighting district, designated as Special Lighting District No. 786 (Urban + Farm Phase1)of the City (the “District”), under MontanaCode Annotated, Title 7, Chapter12, Part 43, as amended (the “Act”), for the purpose of financing costs of certain local improvements described generally therein (the “Improvements”) and paying costs incidental thereto, including costs associated with the creation and administration of the District. Section 2 Notice and Public Hearing. Notice of passage of the Resolution of Intention was duly published, posted and mailed in all respects in accordance with law, and on August 27, 2024, thisCommission approved the creation of the District and the making of the Improvements. The meeting of this 113 Resolution 5619, Creation of SILD 786 – URBAN + FARM PHASE 1 Page 2 of 4 Commission at which this resolution was adopted is the first regular meeting of the Commission following the expiration of the period ended 15 days after the first date of publication of the notice of passage of the Resolution of Intention (the “Protest Period”). Section 3 Protests. Within the Protest Period, no protests were filed with the City Clerk. Section 4 Creation of the District; Insufficiency of Protests. The District is hereby created on the terms and conditions set forth in and otherwise in accordance with, the Resolution of Intention. The findings and determinations made in the Resolution of Intention are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 5 Preparation and Levying of Assessments. It shall be the duty of the City Clerk to prepare all necessary schedules and resolutions for the levying of assessments in the District necessary to finance the Improvements and present such resolution to this Commission for adoption in conformance with Section 7-12-4328, M.C.A., on or before the first Monday in October. The City Clerk is authorized to provide notice of the resolution of assessment and schedule a public hearing therefore in conformance with Sections 7-12-4329 and 7-12-4330, M.C.A., and upon final passage of such resolution deliver it to the City Treasurer. Section 6 Lighting District Fund Established. There is hereby created a fund to be known as the Special Lighting District No. 786 Fund (the “Fund”). All money derived from the collection of the assessments as provided in Section 5 herein and the Act shall be deposited in the Fund and used to 114 Resolution 5619, Creation of SILD 786 – URBAN + FARM PHASE 1 Page 3 of 4 pay costs of the Improvements. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 27 th day of August 2024. ___________________________________ TERENCE CUNNINGHAM Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________________ ALEX NEWBY Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 115 Resolution 5619, Creation of SILD 786 – URBAN + FARM PHASE 1 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE AS TO RESOLUTION AND ADOPTING VOTE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the City of Bozeman, Montana (the “City”), hereby certify that the attached resolution is a true copy of Resolution No. 5619 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, RELATING TO LIGHTING DISTRICT 786(URBAN + FARM PHASE 1); CREATING THE DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS AND ASSESSING THE COSTS FOR MAINTENANCE AND ENERGY THEREFOR TO BENEFITTED PROPERTY BYTHE LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT,(the “Resolution”), on file in the original records of the City in my legal custody; that the Resolution was duly adopted by the City Commission of the City at a meeting onAugust 27, 2024 and that the meeting was duly held by the City Commission and was attended throughout bya quorum, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law; and that the Resolution has not as of the date hereof been amended or repealed. I further certify that, upon vote being taken on the Resolution at said meeting, the following Commissioners voted in favor thereof:______________________________________ _______________________________ ; voted against the same: _________________________; abstained from voting thereon: ________________ ; or were absent:__________________. WITNESS my hand officially this 27th day of August 2024. ___________________________________ ALEX NEWBY Deputy City Clerk 116 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Jim Veltkamp, Chief of Police SUBJECT:Resolution 5634, a Resolution of the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, Confirming the Appointment of Police Officers in Accordance with Montana Code Annotated 7-32-4108 and 7-32-4113. MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Resolution RECOMMENDATION:Approve Resolution 5634. STRATEGIC PLAN:7.2 Employee Excellence: Recruit, retain and value a diverse, well-trained, qualified and motivated team capable of delivering superior performance. Be accountable and expect accountability from others. Make demonstrated use of good judgement a part of the evaluation process for promotions. BACKGROUND:Section 7-32-4108, Montana Code Annotated, provides that all appointments to the “police force” must be confirmed by the City Commission. Section 7-32-4113, Montana Code Annotated, requires that in order to be submitted to the City Commission for confirmation, every applicant will have passed an examination and received a certificate from the police commission noting that the applicant has qualified for appointment. Additionally, the applicant must successfully complete a probationary period before being submitted to the City Commission for confirmation as a member of the “police force.” Officers Jared Rumsey, Jackson Jenkins, and Breanna Fossum have met the above noted requirements and have successfully completed their probationary period. As such, Resolution 5634 was written to confirm the appointment of these officers. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Attachments: Commission Resolution 5634.pdf 117 Report compiled on: August 15, 2024 118 RESOLUTION NO. 5634 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, CONFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF POLICE OFFICERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED 7-32-4108 AND 7-32-4113. WHEREAS, Section 7-32-4108, Montana Code Annotated, provides that all appointments to the “police force” must be confirmed by the city council or commission; and WHEREAS, the following listed officers have passed the required examinations, have been certified by the Police Commission, have successfully completed the probationary period, and have been appointed to the City’s police force by the chief of police. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana: that the following listed officers are confirmed as members of the Bozeman Police Department. JARED RUMSEY JACKSON JENKINS BREANNA FOSSUM PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 27th day of August, 2024. 119 __________________________________ TERRY CUNNINGHAM Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 120 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Takami Clark, Communications & Engagement Manager SUBJECT:National Community Survey Special Presentation MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Plan/Report/Study RECOMMENDATION:National Community Survey Special Presentation STRATEGIC PLAN:7.4 Performance Metrics: Utilize key performance and cost measures to monitor, track and improve the planning and delivery of City programs and services, and promote greater accountability, effectiveness and efficiency. Learn from those outside city government and measure specific tasks for performance. BACKGROUND:The City of Bozeman's Strategic Plan (Section 7.4) calls for the utilization of key performance measures to monitor, track, and improve the planning and delivery of City programs and services to promote greater accountability, effectiveness, and efficiency. From May 3, 2024 to June 9, 2024 the City conducted the National Community Survey to help gauge overall citizen satisfaction across a number of facets of community livability. This statistically valid survey builds on previous efforts completed in 2002, 2015, 2007, and 2005. Joe Dell'Olio, Senior Survey Associate from Polco, will provide a brief presentation of results (see attached report and presentation). UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None. ALTERNATIVES:As directed by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Attachments: The NCS Presentation Bozeman MT 2024.pdf The NCS Report - Bozeman MT 2024.pdf Report compiled on: August 1, 2024 121 Bozeman, MT The National Community Survey 2024 Results 122 Civic Communication & Analytics Platform Smarter, better-connected communities. A civic surveying, policy polling, and constituent communication tech platform. Advanced Survey Science & Performance Analytics Data insights to help communities move forward. The premiere provider of professional civic surveys and performance benchmarking analyses. Exclusive PartnersVisit us online at polco.us 123 Resident Surveys in Local Governance Monitor trends in resident opinion Measure government performance Inform budget, land use, strategic planning decisions Benchmark against other communities 124 The NCS Facets of Community Livability Economy Mobility Community Design Utilities Safety Natural Environment Parks & Recreation Health and Wellness Education, Arts, & Culture Inclusivity & Engagement 125 The National Community Survey in Bozeman The NCS for Bozeman, MT ●5th time conducting The NCS (previous surveys in 2005, 2007, 2015, 2022) ●Survey conducted from May 3rd –June 9th ●Mailing approach employed: ●Probability-based sample of 3,500 randomly selected households ●392 total responses received ●12% overall response rate ●Non-probability, open-participation survey: 90 responses ●Results statistically weighted to reflect Bozeman overall ●95% confidence interval with a +/-5% margin of error 126 Polco’s Benchmarking Database More than 500comparison communities across the nation. Representing the opinions of more than 50 million residents. 127 Overview of Survey Results 128 Balancing Quality and Importance 129 Balancing Quality and Importance 130 Comparisons to National Benchmarks 4 received higher ratings 66 received similar ratings 53 received lower ratings 131 Comparisons to Custom Benchmarks 7 received higher ratings 67 received similar ratings 49 received lower ratings 132 Comparisons to Previous Survey (2022) 0 received higher ratings 60 received similar ratings 63 received lower ratings 133 Key Findings 134 Bozeman’s natural environment and parks and recreation services remain highly valued. 135 Natural Environment in Bozeman About 8 in 10 residents gave excellent or good ratings to: •Overall quality of natural environment•Cleanliness in the Bozeman community 9 in 10 residents Gave excellent or good ratings for Bozeman’s air quality* *Ranking higher than custom benchmark communities 6 in 10 residents Gave excellent or good ratings for Bozeman’s water resources 136 Parks and Recreation in Bozeman Please rate each of the following in Bozeman: Percent excellent or good 83% 88% 55% 65% 80% 80% 83% Recfreation centers or facilities Recreation programs or classes Availability of paths and walking trails City parks Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Higher Similar Lower National Benchmark Comparison 137 Most residents feel a strong sense of safety in Bozeman. 138 Safety in Bozeman 73% 79% 85% 88% 93% From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or natural disaster In the downtown/commercial area during the day In your neighborhood during the day Higher Similar Lower National Benchmark Comparison Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Percent very or somewhat safe 139 70% Police services 83% Ambulance/ Emergency medical services 86% Fire services 68% Fire prevention/ education Safety Services in Bozeman Percent excellent or good Crime Prevention Trended downward from 79% in 2022 to 61%in 2024 Emergency Preparedness Lower than benchmark averages, with 48%offering positive ratings 140 Residents continue to praise Bozeman as a place to visit. 141 Bozeman as a Place to Visit Please rate the following aspect of quality of life in Bozeman: Percent excellent or good 92%Bozeman as a place to visitHigher Similar Lower National Benchmark Comparison Higher than National Benchmark 85th Percentile Much higher than Custom Benchmark 92nd Percentile 142 Potential Areas of Focus 143 Bozeman’s economic health is important to residents. 144 The Economy in Bozeman 54% 60% 64% 30% 36% Economic development Overall economic health Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Overall quality of business and service establishments Higher Similar Lower National Benchmark Comparison Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community: Percent excellent or goodTrends over Time: Increasing/Decreasing Significantly 145 Residents highlight community design and housing as areas of concern. 146 Community Design in Bozeman 81% 3% 11% 13% 17% 36% Availability of affordable quality housing Variety of housing options Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Your neighborhood as a place to live Higher Similar Lower National Benchmark Comparison Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community: Percent excellent or goodTrends over Time: Increasing/Decreasing Significantly 147 Respondents share some growing concerns regarding mobility. 148 Mobility in Bozeman 38% 61% 66% 30% 34% 38% 52% Street repair Traffic enforcement Ease of travel by bicycle Overall quality of the transportation system Ease of travel by car Ease of walking Street cleaning Higher Similar Lower National Benchmark Comparison Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community: Percent excellent or goodTrends over Time: Increasing/Decreasing Significantly 8 in 10* Walked or biked instead of driving 3 in 4* Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone *In the last 12 months 149 Conclusions Highest-performing areas: Bozeman’s natural environment and parks and recreation services remain highly valued. Most residents feel a strong sense of safety in Bozeman. Residents continue to praise Bozeman as a place to visit. Potential areas of focus: Bozeman’s economic health is important to residents. Community design and housing availability highlighted by residents as areas of concern. Respondents share some growing concerns regarding mobility. 150 Thank you!Joe Dell’Olio Senior Survey Associate Polco/National Research Center joe@polco.us 151 Bozeman, MT The National Community Survey Report of Results 2024 Visit us online! www.polco.us National Research Center at Polco is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. Report by: 152 About The NCS™ The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Bozeman. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community: • Economy • Mobility • Community Design • Utilities • Safety • Natural Environment • Parks and Recreation • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture • Inclusivity and Engagement How the results are reported For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/ somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Comparisons to benchmarks NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Bozeman's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Bozeman residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Bozeman's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Bozeman's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. Trends over time Trend data for Bozeman represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines.¹Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than seven percentage points between the 2022 and 2024 surveys, the change is statistically significant. 1.In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 392 residents of the City of Bozeman collected from May 3rd, 2024 to June 9th, 2024. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2024 survey was 12%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Bozeman. 1 153 About The NCS™The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is aboutthe “livability” of Bozeman. A livable community is a place that isnot simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only wherepeople do live, but where they want to live. The survey wasdeveloped by the experts from National Research Center at Polco.Great communities are partnerships of the government, privatesector, community-based organizations and residents, allgeographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinionsconsidering ten central facets of a community:• Economy• Mobility• Community Design• Utilities• Safety• Natural Environment• Parks and Recreation• Health and Wellness• Education, Arts, and Culture• Inclusivity and EngagementHow the results are reportedFor the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly,the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” Comparisons to benchmarks NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Bozeman's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Bozeman residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Bozeman's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Bozeman's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. Trends over time Trend data for Bozeman represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines.¹ Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than seven percentage points between the 2022 and 2024 surveys, the change is statistically significant. 1.In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 392 residents of the City of Bozeman collected fromMay 3rd, 2024 to June 9th, 2024. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for all respondentsand the response rate for the 2024 survey was 12%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profileof respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Bozeman. 2 154 The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Bozeman funded this research. Please contact Gail Jorgenson of the City of Bozeman at gjorgenson@bozeman.net if you have any questions about the survey. Study Limitations All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged.Non-response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences than those who did respond.Coverage error refers to the possibility that some respondents that should have been included in the surveyed population were not (e.g., for a general resident survey, USPS mailing lists may exclude certain types of housing units, such as multi-family buildings where mail is delivered to a common area rather than to a specific unit (though this is rare), or where mail is received at a PO box instead of the at household's physical location. Finally,recall bias occurs when respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and social desirability bias may cause respondents to answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali 2.See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/ 3.Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf 4.Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target ⁴ Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Hispanic origin No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Female Male Sex/age Female 18-34 Female 35-54 Female 55+ Male 18-34 Male 35-54 Male 55+ Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Bozeman. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.³The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. Methods Selecting survey recipients All households within the City of Bozeman were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Bozeman was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Bozeman households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Bozeman boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 5:4 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was randomly selected using the "birthday method". The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the “person who most recently had a birthday” to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. Conducting the survey The 3,500 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on May 3rd, 2024 and data collection for the survey remained open for five weeks and two days. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next was a reminder postcard inviting the household one final time to participate in the survey. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as well as QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. The survey was available in English and Spanish. All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language. About 4% of the 3,500 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,373 households that received the invitations to participate, 392 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.² It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Bozeman survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (392 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open-participation survey was publicized by the City of Bozeman. The open-participation survey was identical to the random sample survey, with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Bozeman and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open-participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on May 24th. The survey remained open for two weeks and two days. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open-participation respondents. 3 155 Conducting the surveyThe 3,500 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on May 3rd, 2024 and data collection for thesurvey remained open for five weeks and two days. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household toparticipate in the survey. The next was a reiminder postcard inviting the household one final time to participate inthe survey. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as wellas QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed thesurvey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.The survey was available in English and Spanish. All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructingparticipants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language.About 4% of the 3,500 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant orthe postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,373 households that receivedthe invitations to participate, 392 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The responserate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.²It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” andaccompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the surveyresults because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error forthe City of Bozeman survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any given percentreported for all respondents (392 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open-participation surveywas publicized by the City of Bozeman. The open-participation survey was identical to the random sample survey,with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Bozeman and also aquestion about where they heard about the survey. The open-participation survey was open to all city residents andbecame available on May 24th. The survey remained open for two weeks and two days. The data presented in thefollowing tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency ofresponses to questions by the open-participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Bozeman funded this research. Please contact Gail Jorgenson of the City of Bozeman at gjorgenson@bozeman.net if you have any questions about the survey. Study Limitations All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged. Non-response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences than those who did respond. Coverage error refers to the possibility that some respondents that should have been included in the surveyed population were not (e.g., for a general resident survey, USPS mailing lists may exclude certain types of housing units, such as multi-family buildings where mail is delivered to a common area rather than to a specific unit (though this is rare), or where mail is received at a PO box instead of the at household's physical location. Finally, recall bias occurs when respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and social desirability bias may cause respondents to answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali 2. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/ 3. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf 4. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target ⁴ Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Hispanic origin No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Female Male Sex/age Female 18-34 Female 35-54 Female 55+ Male 18-34 Male 35-54 Male 55+ 20% 23% 57% 20% 23% 57% 47% 33% 20% 4% 96% 3% 97% 3% 97% 56% 44% 56% 44% 27% 73% 43% 57% 43% 57% 63% 38% 88% 12% 88% 12% 92% 8% 53% 47% 53% 47% 50% 50% 9% 12% 31% 11% 11% 26% 9% 12% 31% 11% 11% 26% 24% 15% 11% 22% 19% 9% Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Bozeman. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.³ The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Bozeman were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households withinthe zip codes serving Bozeman was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updatedlistings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Bozemanhouseholds may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of eachhousing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresseslocated outside of the City of Bozeman boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined asthose with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was randomly selected using the "birthday method". The birthday methodselects a person within the household by asking the “person who most recently had a birthday” to complete thequestionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way peoplerespond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. 4 156 Conducting the surveyThe 3,500 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on May 3rd, 2024 and data collection for thesurvey remained open for five weeks and two days. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household toparticipate in the survey. The next was a reiminder postcard inviting the household one final time to participate inthe survey. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as wellas QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed thesurvey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.The survey was available in English and Spanish. All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructingparticipants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language.About 4% of the 3,500 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant orthe postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,373 households that receivedthe invitations to participate, 392 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 12%. The responserate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.²It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” andaccompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the surveyresults because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error forthe City of Bozeman survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any given percentreported for all respondents (392 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open-participation surveywas publicized by the City of Bozeman. The open-participation survey was identical to the random sample survey,with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Bozeman and also aquestion about where they heard about the survey. The open-participation survey was open to all city residents andbecame available on May 24th. The survey remained open for two weeks and two days. The data presented in thefollowing tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency ofresponses to questions by the open-participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Bozeman funded this research. Please contact Gail Jorgenson of the City of Bozeman at gjorgenson@bozeman.net if you have any questions about the survey. Study Limitations All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged. Non-response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences than those who did respond. Coverage error refers to the possibility that some respondents that should have been included in the surveyed population were not (e.g., for a general resident survey, USPS mailing lists may exclude certain types of housing units, such as multi-family buildings where mail is delivered to a common area rather than to a specific unit (though this is rare), or where mail is received at a PO box instead of the at household's physical location. Finally, recall bias occurs when respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and social desirability bias may cause respondents to answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali 2. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/ 3. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf 4. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2022 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target ⁴Age 18-3435-5455+Hispanicorigin No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or SpanishoriginYes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic,Latino/a/x, or Spanish originHousingtenureOwnRentHousing type AttachedDetachedRace &Hispanicorigin Not white aloneWhite alone, not Hispanic or LatinoSexFemaleMaleSex/age Female 18-34 Female 35-54 Female 55+ Male 18-34 Male 35-54 Male 55+9% 12% 31% 11% 11% 26% 9% 12% 31% 11% 11% 26% 24% 15% 11% 22% 19% 9%Analyzing the dataResponses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where allresponses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to theoriginal survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses fromsurveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2022American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Bozeman. The primary objective of weightingsurvey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. Thecharacteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. Noadjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking modelknown as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.³ The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample arepresented in the following table.NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Somecategories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smallersubgroups.MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Bozeman were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households withinthe zip codes serving Bozeman was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updatedlistings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Bozemanhouseholds may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of eachhousing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresseslocated outside of the City of Bozeman boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined asthose with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was randomly selected using the "birthday method". The birthday methodselects a person within the household by asking the “person who most recently had a birthday” to complete thequestionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way peoplerespond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. 5 157 Key Findings Highest-performing areas: •Bozeman’s natural environment received high ratings for both quality and importance, indicating that this area remains a community strength and priority. •Residents continue to value Bozeman as a place to visit, offering favorable reviews that outperformed comparison communities. •Most residents reported feeling safe in Bozeman and offered high marks for nearly all safety services. •When compared to national benchmarks, a higher-than-average amount of residents praised Bozeman’s fitness and recreational opportunities. Areas of potential focus: •Results highlighted a large gap between the high level of importance residents placed on the local economy, and the below-average ratings given to the city’s overall economic health, indicating a need for additional focus. •Respondents offered assessments that were much lower than benchmarks for the variety of housing options, overall quality of new development, availability of affordable quality housing, and land use, planning and zoning. •Several evaluations pertaining to mobility in Bozeman declined since 2022 and ranked below comparison communities, including traffic enforcement and street repair. •While safety in Bozeman received generally strong reviews, downward trends in crime prevention and below- average marks in emergency preparedness may merit additional focus. Other notable results: •The following items were among those ranked similar to national benchmark comparisons, but higher than custom benchmark comparisons (communities with similar population and median income): o Air quality o Overall health and wellness opportunities in Bozeman o Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area •The following items were among those ranked lower than national benchmark comparisons, but similar to custom benchmark comparisons: o Bozeman as a place to live o The overall quality of life in Bozeman o Overall image or reputation of Bozeman •Bozeman ranked first in the national benchmark database for the number of residents that reported carpooling with other adults or children instead of driving alone in the last 12 months. Areas of greatest change since 2022: Of the 123 evaluative questions included on both the 2022 and current survey iterations, 60 were statistically similar to previous results and 63 ratings decreased since 2022. The most significant of those trends are listed below. Decreases•Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area (-23%) •K-12 education (-22%) •The Bozeman community making all residents feel welcome (-21%) •Availability of affordable quality food (-19%) •Crime prevention (-18%) 6 158 Facets of livability Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. Economy Community Design Mobility Inclusivity and Engagement Utilities Education, Arts, and Culture Safety Health and Wellness Parks and Recreation Natural Environment 38% 40% 61% 68% 77% 80% 83% 83% 36% 36% 84% 79% 68% 61% 74% 67% 74% 84% 56% 71% Quality and Importance by the Numbers The table below shows the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local quality ratings were lower, similar, or higher t.. Quality % excellent or good Importance % essential or very important Facet of Livability Natural Environment Quality Importance Economy Quality Importance Community Design Quality Importance Utilities Quality Importance Parks and Recreation Quality Importance Safety Quality Importance Mobility Quality Importance Health and Wellness Quality Importance Inclusivity andEngagement Quality Importance Education, Arts, andCulture Quality Importance 83% 84% 36% 84% 36% 79% 61% 74% 83% 74% 77% 71% 38% 68% 80% 67% 40% 61% 68% 56% Quality/Importance Gap Analysis The gap analysis chart below shows the same data as above; however, this chart more clearly illustrates the comparative differences in quality and importance ratings for each facet, as well as the absolute ratings for each. Quality Importance vs. national benchmark Lower Similar vs. national benchmark Lower Much lower Similar 7 159 Excellent 16% Good 47% Poor 8% Fair 29% The overall quality of life in Bozeman, 2024 Quality of Life Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. 2022 2024 Bozeman as a place to live The overall quality of life 80%72% Lower80%72% Lower 69% 63% Lower69% 63% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Recommend living in Bozeman to someone who asks Remain in Bozeman for the next five years 46% 49% Much lower46% 49% Much lower 70%61% Much lower 70%61% Much lower Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely) 2022 2024 Overall image or reputation 66%53% Lower66%53% Lower Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 8.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark⁸ 8.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 8 160 Excellent 2% Good 19% Fair 36% Poor 43% Overall confidence in Bozeman government, 2024 Governance Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. 9. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2022 2024 The value of services for the taxes paid to Bozeman The overall direction that Bozeman is taking The job Bozeman government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Bozeman government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect 41%32% Lower 41%32% Lower 22%15% Much lower 22%15% Much lower 40%33% Lower 40%33% Lower 31%21% Much lower 31%21% Much lower 30%26% Much lower 30%26% Much lower 28% Much lower 28% Much lower Please rate the following categories of Bozeman government performance. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Public information services Overall customer service by Bozeman employees 67%50% Similar67%50% Similar 74%69% Similar74%69% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) The City of Bozeman The Federal Government Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) Attended a local public meeting Contacted Bozeman elected officials to express your opinion Contacted the City of Bozeman for help or information Watched a local public meeting Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark⁹ 9 161 Overall confidence in Bozeman government,2024GovernanceStrong local governments produce results thatmeet the needs of residents while making the bestuse of available resources, and are responsive tothe present and future needs of the community asa whole. 9. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. The value of services for the taxes paid to BozemanThe overall direction that Bozeman is takingThe job Bozeman government does at welcoming residentinvolvementOverall confidence in Bozeman governmentGenerally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect 40%28% Much lower 40%28% Much lower 38% 24% Lower 38% 24% Lower 35%27% Lower 35%27% Lower 40%38% Lower 40%38% Lower 57%46% Lower57%46% Lower Please rate the following categories of Bozeman government performance.(% excellent or good)Public information servicesOverall customer service by Bozeman employeesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman.(% excellent or good) 2022 2024 The City of Bozeman The Federal Government 60%50% Lower60%50% Lower Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Attended a local public meeting Contacted Bozeman elected officials to express your opinion Contacted the City of Bozeman for help or information Watched a local public meeting 28% 29% Similar28% 29% Similar 23% 16% Similar 23% 16% Similar 41%42% Similar41%42% Similar 33% 36% Higher33% 36% Higher Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark⁹ 10 162 Overall confidence in Bozeman government,2024GovernanceStrong local governments produce results thatmeet the needs of residents while making the bestuse of available resources, and are responsive tothe present and future needs of the community asa whole. 9. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. The value of services for the taxes paid to BozemanThe overall direction that Bozeman is takingThe job Bozeman government does at welcoming residentinvolvementOverall confidence in Bozeman governmentGenerally acting in the best interest of the communityBeing honestBeing open and transparent to the publicInforming residents about issues facing the communityTreating all residents fairlyTreating residents with respectPlease rate the following categories of Bozeman government performance.(% excellent or good)Public information servicesOverall customer service by Bozeman employeesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman.(% excellent or good) The City of Bozeman The Federal Government 60%50%Lower60%50%Lower 30%29% Similar 30%29% Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following?(% excellent or good)Attended a local public meetingContacted Bozeman elected officials to express your opinionContacted the City of Bozeman for help or informationWatched a local public meetingPlease indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.(% excellent or good)vs. benchmark⁹ 11 163 Excellent 7% Good 30% Fair 33% Poor 31% Overall economic health of Bozeman, 2024 Economy Local governments work together with private and nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. 2022 2024 Bozeman as a place to work Bozeman as a place to visit 52%48% Lower 52%48% Lower 86%92% Higher86%92% Higher Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 81%64% Similar81%64% Similar 54% Similar 54% Similar Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Economic development 42%30% Lower42%30% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) 2022 2024 Overall economic health 40%36% Much lower 40%36% Much lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 10. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁰ 12 164 Overall economic health of Bozeman, 2024EconomyLocal governments work together with private andnonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, tofoster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote athriving local economy.Bozeman as a place to workBozeman as a place to visitPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 68%54% Similar68%54% Similar 83%60% Similar83%60% Similar 52%39% Similar 52%39% Similar 65%54% Similar65%54% Similar 4% 2% Much lower4% 2% Much lower Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community.(% excellent or good)Economic developmentPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman.(% excellent or good) 2022 2024 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 14% 17% Similar 14% 17% Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) Overall economic healthPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good) 10. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁰ 13 165 Excellent 9% Good 29% Fair 32% Poor 30% Overall quality of the transportation system in Bozeman, 2024 Mobility The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. 11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2022 2024 Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking 31%27% Lower 31%27% Lower 24% 30% Lower24% 30% Lower 60%52% Lower60%52% Lower 33%23% Similar 33%23% Similar 49%38% Lower 49%38% Lower 68%61% Similar68%61% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall quality of the transportation system 45%38% Similar45%38% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹¹ 14 166 Overall quality of the transportation system inBozeman, 2024MobilityThe ease with which residents can move abouttheir communities, whether for commuting,leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in thequality of life for all who live, work, and play inthe community. 11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Traffic flow on major streetsEase of public parkingEase of travel by carEase of travel by public transportationEase of travel by bicycleEase of walkingPlease also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community.(% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving 24%16% Similar 24%16% Similar 63% 75% Much higher63% 75% Much higher 81%80% Much higher 81%80% Much higher Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2022 2024 Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services 46%34% Lower 46%34% Lower 45%39% Similar 45%39% Similar 42%30% Lower 42%30% Lower 71%66% Similar71%66% Similar 67%55% Similar67%55% Similar 51%43% Lower 51%43% Lower 55%50% Similar 55%50% Similar 56%44% Similar56%44% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of the transportation systemPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good)vs. benchmark¹¹ 11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 15 167 Excellent 7% Good 28% Fair 38% Poor 26% Overall design or layout of Bozeman's residential and commercial areas, 2024 Community Design A well-designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. 12. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2022 2024 Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 18%13% Much lower 18%13% Much lower 26%17% Lower 26%17% Lower 39%35% Lower 39%35% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Your neighborhood as a place to live 78%81% Similar78%81% Similar Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas 41%36% Lower41%36% Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹² 16 168 Overall design or layout of Bozeman's residentialand commercial areas, 2024Community DesignA well-designed community enhances thequality of life for its residents byencouraging smart land use and zoning,ensuring that affordable housing isaccessible to all, and providing access toparks and other green spaces. 12. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Well-planned residential growthWell-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 51%36% Lower 51%36% Lower 72%56% Similar72%56% Similar 8% 11% Much lower8% 11% Much lower 3% 3% Much lower3% 3% Much lower 22%16% Much lower 22%16% Much lower 73%59% Similar73%59% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community.(% excellent or good)Your neighborhood as a place to livePlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman.(% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement 25%14% Much lower 25%14% Much lower 42%32% Lower42%32% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) Overall design or layout of residential andcommercial areasPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good)vs. benchmark¹² 17 169 Excellent 14% Good 47% Fair 28% Poor 11% Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Bozeman, 2024 Utilities Services such as water, gas, electricity, and internet access play a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. 13. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2022 2024 Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing 45%42% Similar 45%42% Similar 89%91% Similar89%91% Similar 90%86% Higher90%86% Higher 92%94% Similar92%94% Similar 83% 84% Similar83% 84% Similar 75%70% Similar 75%70% Similar 66%58% Similar 66%58% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure 67%61% Similar67%61% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. benchmark¹³ 13. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 18 170 Excellent 29% Good 48% Fair 13% Poor 10% Overall feeling of safety in Bozeman, 2024 Safety Public safety is often the most important task facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety-related services is essential to residents' quality of life. 2022 2024 Overall feeling of safety 89%77% Similar89%77% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 In your neighborhood during the day In Bozeman's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 96%93% Similar96%93% Similar 93%88% Similar93%88% Similar 84%73% Similar84%73% Similar 90%79% Similar90%79% Similar 82% 85% Similar82% 85% Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (% very or somewhat safe) Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 14. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁴ 19 171 Overall feeling of safety in Bozeman, 2024SafetyPublic safety is often the most important taskfacing local governments. All residents shouldfeel safe and secure in their neighborhoodsand in the greater community, and providingrobust safety-related services is essential toresidents' quality of life.Overall feeling of safetyPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good)In your neighborhood during the dayIn Bozeman's downtown/commercial area during thedayFrom property crimeFrom violent crimeFrom fire, flood, or other natural disasterPlease rate how safe or unsafe you feel:(% very or somewhat safe) 2022 2024 Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness 73% 70% Similar73% 70% Similar 79%61% Similar79%61% Similar 69%62% Similar 69%62% Similar 81%83% Similar81%83% Similar 90%86% Similar90%86% Similar 72% 68% Similar72% 68% Similar 52%48% Lower 52%48% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 14. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁴ 20 172 Excellent 37% Good 46% Fair 13% Poor 4% Overall quality of natural environment in Bozeman, 2024 Natural Environment The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. 2022 2024 Cleanliness Water resources Air quality 82%76% Similar82%76% Similar 71%61% Similar71%61% Similar 85%87% Similar85%87% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Preservation of natural areas Bozeman open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 51%43% Lower51%43% Lower 56%52% Similar56%52% Similar 32% 38% Much lower32% 38% Much lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall quality of natural environment 89%83% Similar89%83% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 15. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁵ 21 173 Overall quality of natural environment inBozeman, 2024Natural EnvironmentThe natural environment plays a vital role in the healthand well-being of residents. The natural spaces in whichresidents live and experience their communities has adirect and profound effect on quality of life.CleanlinessWater resourcesAir qualityPlease also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community.(% excellent or good)Preservation of natural areasBozeman open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 60%52% Lower60%52% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of natural environmentPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good) 15. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁵ 22 174 Excellent 43% Good 39% Fair 14% Poor 3% Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, 2024 Parks and Recreation "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources, without such communities having a robust, active system of parks and recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." - National Recreation and Park Association 2022 2024 Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities 85%80% Similar85%80% Similar 87%83% Higher87%83% Higher 91%88% Higher91%88% Higher Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities 84%80% Similar84%80% Similar 72%65% Similar72%65% Similar 61% 55% Similar61% 55% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 88%83% Similar88%83% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 16. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁶ 23 175 Excellent 30% Good 50% Fair 15% Poor 5% Overall health and wellness opportunities in Bozeman, 2024 Health and Wellness The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. 2022 2024 Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care 54%35% Lower 54%35% Lower 43%34% Lower43%34% Lower 56%48% Similar56%48% Similar 25%21% Lower 25%21% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Health services 64%60% Similar64%60% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Please rate your overall health.81%79% Similar81%79% Similar Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) 2022 2024 Overall health and wellness opportunities 82%80% Similar82%80% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 17. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁷ 17.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.24 54%54% 176 Excellent 24% Good 43% Fair 24% Poor 9% Overall opportunities for education, culture and the arts, 2024 Education, Arts, and Culture Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community. 2022 2024 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 73%63% Similar73%63% Similar 75%69% Similar75%69% Similar 16% 10% Much lower16% 10% Much lower 79%56% Similar79%56% Similar 65%57% Similar65%57% Similar 78%67% Similar78%67% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) Public library services (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 71%68% Similar71%68% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 18. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁸ 25 177 Overall opportunities for education,culture and the arts, 2024Education, Arts, and CultureParticipation in the arts, in educational opportunities, andin cultural activities is linked to increased civicengagement, greater social tolerance, and enhancedenjoyment of the local community.Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activitiesCommunity support for the artsAvailability of affordable quality childcare/preschoolK-12 educationAdult educational opportunitiesOpportunities to attend special events and festivalsPlease also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community.(% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Public library services 93%90% Similar93%90% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) Overall opportunities for education, culture, andthe artsPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good) 18. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁸ 26 178 Excellent 5% Good 35% Fair 45% Poor 14% Residents' connection and engagement with their community, 2024 Inclusivity and Engagement Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feel more included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. 2022 2024 Bozeman as a place to raise children Bozeman as a place to retire Sense of community 82%67% Similar82%67% Similar 52% 53% Similar52% 53% Similar 54%43% Lower 54%43% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Residents' connection and engagement with their community 53%40% Similar 53%40% Similar Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 57%36% Lower 57%36% Lower Please rate the job you feel the Bozeman community does at each of the following. (% excellent or good) Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% excellent or good) 19. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁹ 27 179 Residents' connection and engagement withtheir community, 2024Inclusivity and EngagementInclusivity refers to a cultural and environmentalfeeling of belonging; residents who feel invited toparticipate within their communities feel moreincluded, involved, and engaged than those who donot.Bozeman as a place to raise childrenBozeman as a place to retireSense of communityPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman.(% excellent or good)Residents' connection and engagement withtheir communityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole.(% excellent or good)Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 28% 31% Lower28% 31% Lower 39%37% Lower 39%37% Lower 33%24% Much lower 33%24% Much lower Please rate the job you feel the Bozeman community does at each of the following.(% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 58%45% Lower 58%45% Lower 59%46% Lower 59%46% Lower 77%63% Similar77%63% Similar 81%74% Similar81%74% Similar 65% 58% Similar65% 58% Similar 44%36% Lower 44%36% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. (% excellent or good) 2022 2024 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election 27%27% Similar 27%27% Similar 83%76% Similar83%76% Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% excellent or good) 19. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. benchmark¹⁹ 28 180 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2024 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Bozeman 2024 Community Survey Page 1 of 5 Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Bozeman. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q1a Bozeman as a place to live .................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q1b Your neighborhood as a place to live ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q1c Bozeman as a place to raise children ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q1d Bozeman as a place to work ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q1e Bozeman as a place to visit ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q1f Bozeman as a place to retire ................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q1g The overall quality of life in Bozeman ............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q1h Sense of community ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Bozeman as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q2a Overall economic health of Bozeman ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2b Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Bozeman ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q2c Overall design or layout of Bozeman’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q2d Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Bozeman .......................................... (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2e Overall feeling of safety in Bozeman ................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q2f Overall quality of natural environment in Bozeman ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q2g Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q2h Overall health and wellness opportunities in Bozeman .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2i Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2j Residents’ connection and engagement with their community ........................... 1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t likely likely unlikely unlikely know q3a Recommend living in Bozeman to someone who asks ...................... 1 2 3 4 5 q3b Remain in Bozeman for the next five years ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know q4a In your neighborhood during the day ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4b In Bozeman’s downtown/commercial area during the day .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4c From property crime ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4d From violent crime ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4e From fire, flood, or other natural disaster ............................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Bozeman community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q5a Making all residents feel welcome .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q5b Attracting people from diverse backgrounds ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q5c Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q5d Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) ........... 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q6a Overall quality of business and service establishments in Bozeman ................ 1 2 3 4 5 q6b Variety of business and service establishments in Bozeman ................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q6c Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area ...................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q6d Employment opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q6e Shopping opportunities ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q6f Cost of living in Bozeman ...................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q6g Overall image or reputation of Bozeman ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 181 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2024 National Research Center, Inc. Page 2 of 5 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Bozeman community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q7a Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7b Ease of public parking ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7c Ease of travel by car in Bozeman ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7d Ease of travel by public transportation in Bozeman ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7e Ease of travel by bicycle in Bozeman ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7f Ease of walking in Bozeman ................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7g Well-planned residential growth ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7h Well-planned commercial growth ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7i Well-designed neighborhoods ............................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7j Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community ............ 1 2 3 4 5 q7k Public places where people want to spend time ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7l Variety of housing options .................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7m Availability of affordable quality housing ...................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7n Overall quality of new development in Bozeman ....................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7o Overall appearance of Bozeman ......................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7p Cleanliness of Bozeman ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7q Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7r Air quality .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7s Availability of paths and walking trails ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7t Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) .... 1 2 3 4 5 q7u Recreational opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7v Availability of affordable quality food ............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7w Availability of affordable quality health care ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7x Availability of preventive health services ...................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7y Availability of affordable quality mental health care ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7z Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities ........................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7aa Community support for the arts ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7bb Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7cc K-12 education ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7dd Adult educational opportunities ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7ee Sense of civic/community pride ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7ff Neighborliness of residents in Bozeman ........................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7gg Opportunities to participate in social events and activities ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7hh Opportunities to attend special events and festivals ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7ii Opportunities to volunteer ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7jj Opportunities to participate in community matters ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7kk Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds .................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes q8a Contacted the City of Bozeman (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information ............................ 1 2 q8b Contacted Bozeman elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion ............... 1 2 q8c Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) ............................................ 1 2 q8d Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting .............................................................................................. 1 2 q8e Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Bozeman ......................................................................................... 1 2 q8f Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate ................................................................................. 1 2 q8g Voted in your most recent local election ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 q8h Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving .............................................................. 1 2 q8i Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .............................................................................. 1 2 q8j Walked or biked instead of driving ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 182 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2024 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Bozeman 2024 Community Survey Page 3 of 5 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Bozeman. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q9a Public information services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9b Economic development ...................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9c Traffic enforcement ............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9d Traffic signal timing ............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9e Street repair ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9f Street cleaning ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9g Street lighting ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9h Snow removal ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9i Sidewalk maintenance ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9j Bus or transit services ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9k Land use, planning, and zoning ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9l Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9m Affordable high-speed internet access ........................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9n Garbage collection ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9o Drinking water ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9p Sewer services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9q Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) ..................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9r Power (electric and/or gas) utility ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9s Utility billing ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9t Police/Sheriff services ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9u Crime prevention .................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9v Animal control ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9w Ambulance or emergency medical services .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9x Fire services ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9y Fire prevention and education ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9z Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9aa Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) ...... 1 2 3 4 5 q9bb Bozeman open space ........................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9cc Recycling .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9dd Yard waste pick-up .............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9ee City parks ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9ff Recreation programs or classes ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9gg Recreation centers or facilities ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9hh Health services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9ii Public library services ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9jj Overall customer service by Bozeman employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) .................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Bozeman government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q10a The value of services for the taxes paid to Bozeman ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q10b The overall direction that Bozeman is taking .......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10c The job Bozeman government does at welcoming resident involvement ......... 1 2 3 4 5 q10d Overall confidence in Bozeman government ............................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q10e Generally acting in the best interest of the community ....................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10f Being honest ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10g Being open and transparent to the public ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q10h Informing residents about issues facing the community .................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10i Treating all residents fairly .............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q10j Treating residents with respect ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q11a The City of Bozeman ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q11b The Federal Government ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 183 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2024 National Research Center, Inc. Page 4 of 5 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Bozeman community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important q12a Overall economic health of Bozeman ................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 q12b Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Bozeman .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 q12c Overall design or layout of Bozeman’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) .................................................. 1 2 3 4 q12d Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Bozeman (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ....................................... 1 2 3 4 q12e Overall feeling of safety in Bozeman .................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 q12f Overall quality of natural environment in Bozeman ................................................... 1 2 3 4 q12g Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................... 1 2 3 4 q12h Overall health and wellness opportunities in Bozeman ............................................ 1 2 3 4 q12i Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts ....................................... 1 2 3 4 q12j Residents’ connection and engagement with their community ............................. 1 2 3 4 184 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2024 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Bozeman 2024 Community Survey Page 5 of 5 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know d1a Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer .................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 d1b Access the internet from your cell phone ...................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 d1c Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. .................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 d1d Use or check email .................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 d1e Share your opinions online .................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 d1f Shop online .................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health. 1 m Excellent 2 m Very good 3 m Good 4 m Fair 5 m Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 1 m Very positive 2 m Somewhat positive 3 m Neutral 4 m Somewhat negative 5 m Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Bozeman? 1 m Less than 2 years 2 m 2-5 years 3 m 6-10 years 4 m 11-20 years 5 m More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in? 1 m Single-family detached home 2 m Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but no units above or below you) 3 m Condominium or apartment (have units above or below you) 4 m Mobile home 5 m Other D6. Do you rent or own your home? 1 m Rent 2 m Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)? 1 m Less than $300 6 m $2,500 to $3,999 2 m $300 to $599 7 m $4,000 to $6,999 3 m $600 to $999 8 m $7,000 to $9,999 4 m $1,000 to $1,499 9 m $10,000 or more 5 m $1,500 to $2,499 D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household? 1 m No 2 m Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? 1 m No 2 m Yes D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) 1 m Less than $25,000 5 m $100,000 to $149,999 2 m $25,000 to $49,999 6 m $150,000 to $199,999 3 m $50,000 to $74,999 7 m $200,000 to $299,999 4 m $75,000 to $99,999 8 m $300,000 or more D11. Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? 1 m No 2 m Yes D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) d12a q American Indian or Alaskan Native d12b q Asian d12c q Black or African American d12d q Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander d12e q White d12f q A race not listed D13. In which category is your age? 1 m 18-24 years 5 m 55-64 years 2 m 25-34 years 6 m 65-74 years 3 m 35-44 years 7 m 75 years or older 4 m 45-54 years D14. What is your sex? m Female m Male m Identify in another way D15. What is your sexual orientation? m Asexual m Heterosexual m Queer m Bisexual m Lesbian m Questioning m Gay m Pansexual m Other Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 185 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM: Bernie Massey, Assistant Treasurer Laurae Clark, Treasurer Melissa Hodnett, Finance Director SUBJECT:Resolution 5608, Establishing Tree Maintenance District Assessments for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (FY25). MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Resolution RECOMMENDATION:Consider the Motion: I move to adopt Commission Resolution No. 5608 establishing a 3% increase in Tree Maintenance District Assessments for FY25, making the assessment rate $0.004194 per assessable square foot. STRATEGIC PLAN:7.5. Funding and Delivery of City Services: Use equitable and sustainable sources of funding for appropriate City services, and deliver them in a lean and efficient manner. BACKGROUND:On July 16, 1990, the City Commission passed Commission Resolution No. 2804 creating a city-wide tree maintenance district for the purpose of planting and maintaining trees in all public places, rights-of-ways and parks. On June 25, 2024, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 5600 adopting the FY25 Budget, which included a 3% increase in Tree Maintenance District Assessments to support eligible district expenditures. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:None ALTERNATIVES:Changes to the rate approved in the FY25 Budget may require budget amendments to ensure a balanced budget. FISCAL EFFECTS:The assessment rate proposed is consistent with the FY25 Budget. The estimated annual increase to the median homeowner, on a 7,500 sq ft lot, is approximately $0.92. The total annual assessment estimated for the median homeowner is $31.46. Attachments: Resolution 5608 Tree Mtc Assessments FY25.docx 186 Report compiled on: July 11, 2024 187 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 5608 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025 UPON ALL REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSE INCURRED IN THE CITY-WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN AND TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICT TO ENCOMPASS ANNEXED PROPERTIES. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Bozeman did on the 16th day of July 1990, following notice and public hearing, regularly pass Commission Resolution No. 2804 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, CREATING A CITY-WIDE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLANTING AND MAINTAINING TREES IN ALL PUBLIC PLACES, RIGHTS-OF-WAYS AND PARKS. Which Commission Resolution No. 2804 provides the basis and method of assessing the cost against property herein assessed; and WHEREAS, Commission Resolution No. 2804 further provides that said special assessments shall be made, levied, and collected in the same manner as are other special assessments and levies of the City of Bozeman; and 188 Resolution No. 5608, Tree Maintenance Assessments, FY25 Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, Section 7-12-4179, Montana Code Annotated, allows the district boundaries to be changed by resolution; and WHEREAS, the district boundaries are the city corporate limits, to include all annexed property as of the date of this resolution; and WHEREAS, to defray the costs of tree maintenance for the coming assessment year, the Commission must now establish an assessment to be levied for said services. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of said Commission Resolution No. 2804 and the laws of the State of Montana, BE IT RESOLVED AND IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, STATE OF MONTANA: Section 1 To defray the estimated cost and expense of planting and maintaining trees in all public places, rights-of-way and parks located within the maintenance district, which is hereby extended to include the city’s corporate limits existing as of the date of this resolution, for Fiscal Year 2025, thereis hereby levied and assessed against the assessable area of the several lots, pieces and parcels of land benefited by the maintenance district within the City of Bozeman as set forth in Schedule A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, which describes each lot or parcel of land with the name of the owner and/or owners, if known, and the amount assessed against the same. The said sums shall be paid and the collection thereof be made in the manner and in accordance with Commission Resolution No. 2804of the City of Bozeman, Montana, and the laws of the State of Montana governing the collection of maintenance district assessments. Failure to pay such assessment when the same shall become due and payable shall make such persons and such lots and parcels of land liable to the penalties provided by law relative to delinquent taxes and assessments. The November assessments shall become delinquent at 5:01 p.m. on November 30, 2024, and the May assessments shall become delinquent at 5:01 p.m. on May 31, 2025. 189 Resolution No. 5608, Tree Maintenance Assessments, FY25 Page 3 of 5 Section 2 The assessment basis and method of assessing the costs of the maintenance district against property herein assessed shall be as specified in Resolution No. 2804, which is hereby incorporated by this reference and made a part of this Resolution. Section 3 The per-square-foot assessment rate in said maintenance district shall be 0.004194, per square foot of actual lot area, with a limit on the maximum square footage assessed for zones listed below. For non-conforming residences located in business and manufacturingzoning districts without any business or manufacturing use attached, there shall be a maximum of 15,000 square feet assessed. Zoning Maximum assessment square footage (Cap) R-1 15,000 sq ft R-2 15,000 sq ft R-3 15,000 sq ft R-4 15,000 sq ft R-5 15,000 sq ft RMH 8,250 sq ft/unit RS 15,000 sq ft RO No Cap on developed parcels. Cap of 15,000 square ft on undeveloped (parcels that have no structures and have not received subdivision review.) PLI (including MSU, Schools, Govt, Hospital, & Public Owned property) 25% of total sq ft REMU No Cap on developed parcels Cap of 15,000 square ft on undeveloped (parcels that have no structures and have not received subdivision review.) All Business Zones No Cap on developed parcels 190 Resolution No. 5608, Tree Maintenance Assessments, FY25 Page 4 of 5 Cap of 15,000 square ft on undeveloped (parcels that have no structures and have not received subdivision review.) All Manufacturing Zones No Cap on developed parcels Cap of 15,000 square ft on undeveloped (parcels that have no structures and have not received subdivision review.) Section 4 This assessment shall be levied for the fiscal year of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, and be billed in October 2024 as are all other special assessments. Any condominium and/or subdivision of land recorded on or before September 30, 2024, is subject to assessment for Fiscal Year 2025. Section 5 The regular session of the Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana to be held at City Hall, 121 N Rouse Ave, Bozeman, Montana, on the 20th day of August 2024 at 6:00 p.m., and the same is hereby designated as the time and place at which objections to the final adoption of the Resolution will be heard by said Commission. Section 6 The City Clerk of the City of Bozeman, did publish in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle a Notice signed by the City Clerk, stating that a Resolution levying and assessing a special assessment to defray the cost and expense of planting and maintaining trees in all public places, rights-of-way and parks located within the City’s corporate limits for the Fiscal Year 2025, against the property on which such service was rendered, is on file in the office of the City Clerk and subject to inspection. Said notice states the time and place at which objections will be heard by the Commission to the final adoption of the Resolution. The final publication of said Notice was 191 Resolution No. 5608, Tree Maintenance Assessments, FY25 Page 5 of 5 published at least five (5) days before the date set by the Commission for hearing objections and final adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana at a regular session thereof held on the 20th day of August 2024. ____________________________ TERRY CUNNINGHAM Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 192 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Melissa Hodnett, Finance Director SUBJECT:Resolution 5623, Establishing and Affixing the Number of Mills to be Charged Against the Assessed Valuation of All Taxable Property Situated Within the Corporate Jurisdictional Boundaries of the City for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (FY25) MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Resolution RECOMMENDATION:Consider the Motion: I move to approve Resolution 5623. STRATEGIC PLAN:7.5. Funding and Delivery of City Services: Use equitable and sustainable sources of funding for appropriate City services, and deliver them in a lean and efficient manner. BACKGROUND: Annually, the Department of Revenue (DOR) sends certified taxable values to jurisdictions in the State of Montana. Based on these values, the City Commission is required to adopt a resolution setting mill levies for the fiscal year. Typically, City staff proposes mill levies in line with the amount of revenue included in the adopted budget by the second Monday in September (MCA 15-10-305). The certified taxable values received by the City early August indicated that the taxable values had decreased since the prior tax year. On August 15, 2024 the City received a letter from the DOR explaining that they had ran out of time to add newly taxable values to the tax roll this year. Establishing mill levies based on this incorrect certified value could result in a higher share of taxes being paid by existing properties for the 2024 tax year. The City, in collaboration with Gallatin County, the Bozeman School District, the City of Belgrade, and the Belgrade School District formally responded to the DOR on August 19th, requesting that they work with us to correct certified values prior to tax bills being mailed in October. On August 20th, the DOR met with Bozeman and Belgrade districts and confirmed their willingness to work on recertifying values. At this time, staff of all agencies are working to determine new deadlines for recertification and establishing and affixing mill levies. 193 UNRESOLVED ISSUES:City staff is awaiting confirmation that tax bills can be mailed on time using updated certified values from the DOR, and updated deadlines for establishing and affixing mill levies. ALTERNATIVES:The City could establish and affix mill levies using the published certified values. This is likely to result in a higher share of taxes being paid by existing properties. FISCAL EFFECTS:Fiscal effects will be determined when City staff has a formal recommendation to the City Commission to establish and affix mill levies. Attachments: 2024.08.15_ DOR PAD Letter to City of Bozeman Commissioners.pdf Response to DOR Certified Taxable Values.pdf Resolution5623EstablishingMillLevies.docx Report compiled on: August 1, 2024 194 195 196 August 19, 2024 Paula Gilbert Property Assessment Division Montana Department of Revenue RE: Taxable Value for the 2024 Tax Year Dear Paula, Thank you for your letter dated 8/15/24 explaining the causes behind the decrease in certified taxable value for the 2024 tax year for jurisdictions within Gallatin County. We sincerely appreciate the Department of Revenue’s efforts during a time period where property tax fatigue and angst is elevated statewide. The impact of the failure to fully capture new construction in our certified values will have a significant impact on our jurisdictions taxpayers, property tax revenues, and budgets. If taxes are levied based on these incorrect certified values, existing property owners are likely to pay higher tax bills while newly taxable properties may avoid payments until 2025. Doing so will also cause revenue shortfalls for some jurisdictions, which may result in a lower level of service to the communities. These impacts are not acceptable to our elected officials, administrators, and constituents. We take these tax implications very seriously. While we truly appreciate your work over the last year in developing certified values, we would like to formally request your support and collaboration in an effort to correct our newly taxable values in advance of tax bills being mailed in October. We appreciate your willingness to meet with us and look forward to continued collaboration in working toward the fair treatment of our jurisdictions taxpayers. Sincerely, _______________________________ Chuck Winn, City Manager City of Bozeman _______________________________ Casey Bertram, Superintendent Bozeman School District _______________________________ Jim Doar, County Administrator Gallatin County _______________________________ Neil Cardwell, City Manager City of Belgrade _______________________________ Dede Semerad, Superintendent Belgrade School District Docusign Envelope ID: 055201A0-1C7F-469F-BFE0-E641A897F628 197241 Resolution No. 5623 Establishing and Affixing the Number of Mills for FY25 April 2020 1 of 4 RESOLUTION 5623 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, ESTABLISHING AND AFFIXING THE NUMBER OF MILLS TO BE CHARGED AGAINST THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 (FY25). WHEREAS,after due and proper legal notice, at a regular session of the City Commission on August 13, 2024, the public hearing on the proposed change of ad-valorem tax revenue was held; and WHEREAS,the Montana Department of Revenue issued to the City a 2024 Certified Taxable Valuation received on August 1, 2024; and WHEREAS,in accordance with Montana Code Annotated, a resolution must be adopted by the City Commission in order to determine the amount of the City or Town taxes to be levied and assessed on the taxable property situated within the City for the current fiscal year; and WHEREAS,the City Clerk must certify to the County Clerk a copy of such resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, as follows: Section 1 That for the purpose of providing and maintaining basic City services the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby affix 98.50 mills to be levied for the All-Purpose General Fund for general government purposes as provided by Sections 7-6-4451 and 15-10-420 MCA. Section 2 That the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby establish and affix a mill levy in the amount of 2.00 mills to provide funds for the City Planning Activity as provided by Sections 7-6-4451 and 15-10-420 MCA. 198 Resolution No. 5623 Establishing and Affixing the Number of Mills for FY25 April 2020 2 of 4 Section 4 That the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby establish and affix a mill levy in the amount of 10.48 mills to provide for the total City payment of premiums for Health Medical Insurance for City employees in accordance with Title 2 Chapter 18 Part 7 MCA, Section 2 of Chapter 359 Laws 1975, Section 7-32-4117 MCA, and Section 7-3-4130 MCA. Section 5 That for the purpose of providing and maintaining basic City services, the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby affix 30.00 mills to be levied for the Fire Department Capital & Equipment Replacement, Fire Staffing, and Police Staffing as provided by Section 7-6-4451 MCA. Section 6 That for the purpose of funding the Local Government Study Commission, the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby affix 1.00 mills to be levied as provided by Section 7-3-1842 MCA. Section 7 In accordance with Section 7-7-4265 MCA, the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana does hereby establish and affix a mill levy in the amount of 4.75 mills to provide for principal and interest payments on outstanding Trails, Open Space and Parks (TOP) General Obligation Bonds, 9.17 mills to provide for principal and interest payments on outstanding Bozeman Public Safety Center (BPSC) General Obligation Bonds, and 2.74 mills to provide for principal and interest payments on outstanding Fire Station #2 Relocation General Obligation Bonds. 199 Resolution No. 5623 Establishing and Affixing the Number of Mills for FY25 April 2020 3 of 4 PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, at a regular session thereof held on the 27th day of August, 2024. ___________________________________ TERENCE CUNNINGHAM Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 200 Resolution No. 5623 Establishing and Affixing the Number of Mills for FY25 April 2020 4 of 4 CITY OF BOZEMAN Mill Levy Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (FY25) Levy Purpose Number of Mills All Purpose Levy 98.50 City Planning 2.00 Health/Medical Insurance 10.48 Public Safety Staff & Equipment 30.00 Local Government Study Commission 1.00 Bozeman Public Safety Center Bonds 9.17 Parks & Trails GO Bonds 4.75 Fire Station #2 Relocation GO Bonds 2.74 Grand Total Levied 158.64 201 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Elizabeth Cramblet, Associate Planner Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Erin George, Interim Director of Community Development SUBJECT:NEHMU Zone Text Amendment to Modify Table 38.310.040.C of the City's Development Code to Allow Apartments as a Permitted Use with No Restrictions in Area on the Second and Subsequent Floors, and Basements of Buildings, and to Allow Lobbies on the Ground Floor When Associated with Residential Uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District), Application 24225. MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Community Development - Legislative RECOMMENDATION:Consider the Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, application materials, public comment, recommendation of the Community Development Board in their capacity as the Zoning Commission, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 24225 and move to approve the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. STRATEGIC PLAN:4.2 High Quality Urban Approach: Continue to support high-quality planning, ranging from building design to neighborhood layouts, while pursuing urban approaches to issues such as multimodal transportation, infill, density, connected trails and parks, and walkable neighborhoods. BACKGROUND:This application includes a privately initiated proposal to modify the City's development code to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area of the second and subsequent floors, and basements, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District). Currently the NEHMU zoning district only allows apartments as an accessory use that occupies less than fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the building, and not on the ground floor, only the second and subsequent floors. The change would essentially allow multi-story residential buildings within the NEHMU district that are currently not allowed. The Northeast Historic Mixed Use District is located in the northeast section of the city that encompasses approximately 40 acres and is located within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. With the exception of a few 202 outlier parcels, a majority of the district is bounded by E Tamarack Street to the north, N Rouse Avenue to the west, E Peach Street to the south, and Front and Plum Street to the east. The district was created in 2002 to legitimize a historically diverse land use pattern that did not fit districts then in existence. The area was primarily industrial but also had a considerable amount of lower density residential uses. The intent of the northeast historic mixed use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creating integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. Nearby municipal zoning to the north is M-1 (Light Manufacturing District) and B-2M (Community Business District Mixed). West of the site is zoned PLI (Public Lands and Institutions) and R-2 (Residential Moderate Density District). South and southeast is zoned R-2, M-1, and B-2M, and east is zoned M-1 and M-2 (Manufacturing and Industrial District). The future land use designation of the NEHMU area changed from Industrial to Community Commercial Mixed Use in 2020. A draft of an implementing ordinance is attached to show how the proposed amendment would be integrated with other residential uses. The action on this agenda is a public hearing and direction whether or not to proceed, not provisional adoption. The two step adoption process will proceed on future consent agendas should the City Commission approve the proposal. UNRESOLVED ISSUES:There are no identified conflicts on this application at this time. ALTERNATIVES:1. Approve the application; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended zone text amendment; 3. Deny the application based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. FISCAL EFFECTS:No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Zone Text Amendment. Attachments: 24225 NEHMU ZTA CC SR.pdf Draft Ordinance 24225 NEHMU ZTA.pdf Report compiled on: August 13, 2024 203 Page 1 of 22 24225 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Public Hearings: Community Development Board (Zoning Commission) meeting was on July 15, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. City Commission meeting is on August 27, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. Project Description: A Zone Text Amendment to modify the City’s development code to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area on the second and subsequent floors, and basements of buildings, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District). Project Location: The proposed revision to the UDC Table 38.310.040.C would be applicable to any lot within the NEHMU District, city wide. Recommendation: Meets standards for approval. Recommended Community Development Board Zone Text Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 24225 and recommend approval of the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment. Recommended City Commission Zone Text Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, draft ordinance, application materials, public comment, recommendation of the Community Development Board in their capacity as the Zoning Commission, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 24225 and move to approve the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Report: August 13, 2024 Staff Contact: Elizabeth Cramblet, Associate Planner Agenda Item Type: Action – Legislative 204 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 2 of 22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is based on the application materials submitted and public comment received to date. Unresolved Issues There are no identified conflicts on this application at this time. Project Summary This application includes a proposal to modify the City’s development code to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area on the second and subsequent floors, and basements, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District). Currently the NEHMU zoning district only allows apartments as an accessory use that occupies less than fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the building, and not on the ground floor, only the second and subsequent floors. The Northeast Historic Mixed Use District is located in the northeast section of the city that encompasses approximately 40 acres and is located within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. With the exception of a few outlier parcels, a majority of the district is bounded by E Tamarack Street to the north, N Rouse Avenue to the west, E Peach Street to the south, and Front and Plum Street to the east. The district was created in 2002 to legitimize a historically diverse land use pattern that did not fit districts then in existence. The area was primarily industrial but also had a considerable amount of lower density residential uses. The intent of the northeast historic mixed use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. Nearby municipal zoning to the north is M-1 (Light Manufacturing District) and B-2M (Community Business District Mixed). West of the site is zoned PLI (Public Lands and Institutions) and R-2 (Residential Moderate Density District). South and southeast is zoned R- 2, M-1, and B-2M, and east is zoned M-1 and M-2 (Manufacturing and Industrial District). The future land use designation of the NEHMU area changed from industrial to Community Commercial Mixed Use in 2020. In determining whether the criteria applicable to this application are met, Staff considers the entire body of plans and regulations for land development. Standards which prevent or mitigate possible negative impacts are incorporated in many locations in the municipal code but are 205 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 3 of 22 principally in Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. References in the text of this report to Articles, Divisions, or in the form xx.xxx.xxx are to the Bozeman Municipal Code. Community Development Board (Zoning Commission Summary) The Community Development Board, acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission, held a public hearing on July 15, 2024 and considered the application to modify the City’s development code to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area on the second and subsequent floors, and basements, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District). The Community Development Board, acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission, voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment. Overall, the board members were in favor of the requested zone text amendment for the NEHMU District and felt the change to no restrictions for residential on the second and subsequent floors is appropriate given the growing need for housing and is in accordance with the growth policy in that it seeks to add density and residential uses where appropriate. Video Link for CDB meeting (External Link) Alternatives 1. Approve the application; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended zone text amendment; 3. Deny the application based on findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 206 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 4 of 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 Unresolved Issues ........................................................................................................ 2 Project Summary.......................................................................................................... 2 Community Development Board Summary……………………………………………….3 Alternatives.................................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .............................................................................................. 5 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS………………………….8 SECTION 3 - ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS........... 8 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ..................................................... 19 APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ............. 19 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT................................................. 22 APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF .......................... 22 FISCAL EFFECTS .......................................................................................................... 22 ATTACHMENTS……………………………………………………………………………22 207 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 5 of 22 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map (2023 image) NEHMU District 208 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 6 of 22 Figure 2: Future Land Use Designations (2023 image) NEHMU District Urban Neighborhood Community Commercial Mixed Use Public Lands & Institutions Traditional Core Industrial Community Commercial Mixed Use 209 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 7 of 22 Figure 3: Current Zoning Map (2023 image) 210 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 8 of 22 SECTION 2 – RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, staff finds the criteria for approval to be met and therefore recommends approval of the application as submitted. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the amendment. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure deficiencies. The Community Development Board, acting in their capacity as the Zoning Commission, will hold a public hearing on this zone text amendment on July 15, 2024 and will forward its recommendation to the City Commission on the zone text amendment. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. in the Commission Room at City Hall, 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Boze man, Montana. Members of the public will also be able to participate remotely. Instructions for joining the meeting remotely will be included on the meeting agenda. The agenda is available in the Events portion of the City’s website at https://www.bozeman.net/home at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. SECTION 3 - ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. A zone text amendment must be in accordance with the growth policy (criteria A) and be designed to secure safety from fire and other dangers (criteria B), promote public health, public safety, and general welfare (criteria C), and facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements (criteria D). Therefore, to approve a zone map amendment the Commission must find Criteria A-D are met. In addition, the Commission must also consider criteria E-K, and may find the zone text amendment to be positive, neutral, or negative with regards to these criteria. To approve the zone text amendment, the Commission must find the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K. In determining whether the criteria are met, Staff considers the entire body of plans and regulations for land development. Standards which prevent or mitigated negative impacts are incorporated throughout the entire municipal code but are principally in Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. For information about how the code as a whole applies examples of specific code sections and the timing of future application is provided as part of the analysis below. 211 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 9 of 22 Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. Criterion met. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020, Chapter 5, p. 73, in the section titled Review Criteria for Zoning Amendments And Their Application, discusses how the various criteria in 76-2-304 MCA are applied locally. Application varies depending on whether an amendment is for the zoning map or for the text of Chapter 38, BMC. “In a text amendment, policy statements weigh heavily as the standards being created or revised implement the growth policy’s aspirations and intent. The City must balance many issues in approving urban development.” The proposed amendment does not change the zoning map. Therefore, it is unnecessary to analyze compliance with the future land use map; however, staff notes that the NEHMU district is an implementing district for the Community Commercial Mixed Use future land use designation. A change in permitted uses must be evaluated for alignment with goals listed for the land use designations within the Bozeman Community Plan 2020. The change in future land use designation in 2020 is cause to evaluate the best fit of existing standards in the district. The basic planning precepts on page 20 of the BCP 2020 include, “The health and well-being of the public is an essential focus and influences and is influenced in turn by urban design and land development.” Also, “The City intends to create a healthy, safe, resilient, and sustainable community by incorporating a holistic approach to the design, construction, and operation of buildings, neighborhoods, and the City as a whole.” The proposed amendments provide for public health, safety, and welfare of the community by providing clear standards and administrative processes for development of critical infrastructure concurrently with new residential development that will meet the needs of our growing city. The applicant further states that “The Future Land Use Map in the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 designates the property as Community Commercial Mixed Use. The intent of Community Commercial Mixed Use is to promote commercial areas necessary for economic health and vibrancy. Residences on upper floors, in appropriate circumstances, are encouraged. The urban character expected in this designation includes urban streetscapes, plazas, outdoor seating, public art, and hardscaped open space and park amenities. High density residential areas are expected in close proximity. This proposed change to NEHMU will further the intent of this FLUM Category and will further several other goals and objectives of the Community Plan.” Several relevant goals and objectives have been identified by the applicant or staff. No points of conflict with the text of the growth policy have been identified. Goal DCD-1: Support urban development within the City. DCD-1.2 Remove regulatory barriers to infill. 212 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 10 of 22 The applicant states “When the Community Plan was adopted, it changed the direction of this neighborhood from industrial to mixed use. Currently, one of the most significant factors holding back the NEHMU district from being a viable mixed use district is the cap on the percentage of residential use that can be built within a structure. Removing the 50% cap and making apartments unrestricted (on the 2nd and subsequent floors) will remove regulatory barriers for infill and will support compact neighborhoods.” Much of the industrial component in the NEHMU district has been replaced by commercial development over the last ten years. Currently there is ample commercial development within this zone district that would benefit from additional residential units. Goal N-1: Support well-planned, walkable neighborhoods. N-3.7 Support compact neighborhoods, small lot sizes, and small floor plans, especially through mechanisms such as density bonuses. The proposed amendment would allow additional residential units in buildings providing additional housing opportunities within the NEHMU district. M-1.1 Prioritize mixed-use land use patterns. Encourage and enable the development of housing, jobs, and services in close proximity to one another. The introduction to Theme 2 in the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 says in part “Mixed neighborhoods can help provide the density of people needed to support nearby commercial activities.” As stated earlier, one of the intents and purposes of the NEHMU District is to support of mix and variety of non-residential and residential uses. It is expected that the lots within this district will continue to develop under a variety of uses which may increase or decrease in scope in any given portion of the district. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Criterion met. As stated in the introduction to this Section 3, the Bozeman evaluates proposals against the municipal code as a whole. Building code standards for fire resistance, exiting, and other protections remain in place and will continue to protect the public. The proposed amendment does not alter any standard adopted to address this criterion. Therefore, the code as a whole continues to satisfy this requirement. The following are examples of existing code sections that will address this criterion. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 18.02 International Fire code Adopt standards for fire prevention and control Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Site plan and building permit 213 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 11 of 22 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.400.010 Streets, general Access for emergency services Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan. 38.410.090 Fire protection requirements Development design Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Subdivision, site plan, and building permit C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. Criterion met. The existing standards addressing this criterion remain in place such as floodplain protections, provisions of water and sewer services, and similar standards. Standards remain for setbacks, light and air, emergency services, and other issues to protect health and physical safety. Apartments are currently allowed in the NEHMU district on a limited basis. The amendment allows apartments as a permitted use on the 2nd and subsequent floors of mixed use buildings within the district. Each site development application will need to be processed as are other applications ensuring compliance with these requirements. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 18.02 International Fire code Adopt standards for fire prevention and control Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Site plan and building permit 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.410.070 Municipal water, sewer systems Location and requirement to install. Sewer collection facilities plan, Water facilities plan Subdivision or site plan. 38.410.090 Fire protection requirements Development design Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Subdivision, Site plan, and building permit 214 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 12 of 22 38.420 Parks Standards for location, type, and development of parks and trails Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.5 Project Design Site layouts, landscaping, building configuration, signs, lighting Site plan and building permit D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Criterion met. The City conducts extensive planning for municipal transportation, water, sewer, parks, and other facilities and services provided by the City. The adopted plans allow the City to consider existing conditions and identify enhancements needed to provide additional service needed by new development. The City implements these plans through its capital improvements program that identifies individual projects, project construction scheduling, and financing of construction. The proposed text amendment does not alter any requirements or standards associated with the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements. The applicant adds “the NEHMU district already contemplates apartments as a use. This change only changes the threshold within a building that can be apartments. It should also be mentioned that this was likely studied during the Community Plan Update to ensure there were adequate facilities to service a mixed-use neighborhood. Additionally, conformance with these standards will be verified with each development application and any negative impacts will be required to be mitigated.” Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 18.02 International Fire code Adopt standards for fire prevention and control Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Site plan and building permit 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 215 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 13 of 22 38.410.060 Easements Location and form of easements for utilities Transportation Master Plan, Sewer collection facilities plan, Water facilities plan Annexation for collector and arterial streets. Subdivision or site plan for all others. 38.410.070 Municipal water, sewer systems Location and requirement to install. Sewer collection facilities plan, Water facilities plan Subdivision or site plan. 38.410.090 Fire protection requirements Development design Fire/EMS master plan, International Fire Code Subdivision, site plan, and building permit 38.420 Parks Standards for location, type, and development of parks and trails Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Subdivision or site plan E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Criterion met. The proposed amendments to not alter existing standards for setbacks, maximum heights, open space, park dedication, or other related issues. The standards previously adopted to address this criteria remain in place. Considering the code as a whole, the standards listed in this criterion are not being changed with these amendments and therefore the standard continues to be met. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan review, building permit 38.420 Parks Standards for location, type, and development of parks and trails Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.520.060 On-site residential and commercial open space Private land open area requirements Site plan 216 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 14 of 22 F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. Criterion met. The City conducts extensive planning for municipal transportation, trails, and parks related to this criterion and services provided by the City. The adopted plans allow the City to consider existing conditions and identify enhancements needed to provide a dditional service needed by new development. The proposed amendments do not alter these plans or associated standards. The NEHMU is largely the same area as the Northeast Neighborhood Urban Renewal District. The urban renewal district has been investing in upgraded streets in the area including Peach Street and Tamarack Street. Individual development applications are reviewed against the following adopted standards to ensure adequate transportation services. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.400 Transportation Facilities and Access Streets standards for size and construction Transportation Master Plan Subdivision or site plan review 38.410.060 Easements Location and form of easements for utilities Transportation Master Plan, Annexation for collector and arterial streets. Subdivision or site plan for all others. 38.420.110 Recreation Pathways Location and requirement to install. Park, Recreation, and Active Transportation Plan Annexation for Class 1 Trails easement. Subdivision or site plan for all else. G. Promotion of compatible urban growth. Criterion met. Development standards and zoning districts ensure the City grows in a compatible manner. The City has defined compatible development as: “The use of land and the construction and use of structures which is in harmony with adjoining development, existing neighborhoods, and the goals and objectives of the city's adopted growth policy. Elements of compatible development include, but are not limited to, variety of architectural design; rhythm of architectural elements; scale; intensity; materials; building siting; lot and building size; hours of operation; and integration with existing community systems including water and sewer services, natural elements in the area, 217 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 15 of 22 motorized and non-motorized transportation, and open spaces and parks. Compatible development does not require uniformity or monotony of architectural or site design, density or use.” There is no one pattern or method in which to build a community. Many different configurations of uses and buildings can coexist as well. The City has adopted many standards to avoid and mitigate demonstrable negative impacts of development. Other standards addressing compatibility, such as setbacks, building mass, and zone edge transitions, are not being modified through these amendments. Compliance with City standards is considered adequate to avoid negative impacts of development and ensure compatible development. Therefore, considering the code as a whole, staff concludes the criterion is met. The applicant further suggests that “This neighborhood (and zoning district) is planned to be mixed use in nature with residential on upper floors of the building. This is currently limited in the NEHMU district due to the fact that apartments are limited to 50% of the building. This proposed change will eliminate this threshold. Allowing more apartments in a building promotes more people to live in the neighborhood, which will hopefully allow the commercial mixed-use areas be more successful.” Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.310 Permitted Uses What can be done where in the city. Growth policy Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320.060 Zone Edge Transitions Height adjustments on the edge of some zones Site plan 38.340 Overlay District Standards Historic preservation SOI Standards for Historic Preservation, Design Guidelines for Historic Preservation Site plan and building permit 38.5 Project Design Site layouts, landscaping, building configuration, signs, lighting Site plan and building permit 218 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 16 of 22 H. Character of the district. Criterion met. Section 76-2-301, MCA says “Municipal zoning authorized. For the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community, the city or town council or other legislative body of cities and incorporated towns in hereby empowered to regulate and restrict the height, number of stories, and size of buildings and other structures; the percentage of lot that may be occupied; the size of yards, courts and other open spaces; the density of population; and the location of use of buildings, structures, and land for trade, industry, residence, or other purposes.” Section 76-2-302, MCA says “…legislative body may divide the municipality into districts of the number, shape, and area as are considered best suited to carry out the purposes [promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community] of this part.” Emphasis added. The proposed amendment does not create or delete a district or modify the geographic extent of a district. The City has adopted form and intensity standards in Division 38.320 as part of the implementation of the zoning enabling language cited above. The City has adopted building and site design standards in Divisions 38.510 and 38.530 also as part of the implementation of the zoning enabling language cited above. These are applied to all development according to the district in which the development is located. Uses for districts are established in Division 38. 310. The proposed amendments do not add or remove permitted uses in districts. They do alter the extent to which those uses can be developed by removing a restriction on the proportion of a mixed use building which can be used for residences. The original limitation of less than 50% was originally adopted when the area was planned f or primarily industrial uses. The change in future land use designation in 2020 to Community Commercial Mixed Use fundamentally alters the expected character of the area. Revisions to the zoning standards consistent with the new future land use designation is appropriate as zoning must be “in accordance” with an adopted growth policy. Character of a district is made up of many different elements; including but not limited to uses, size of lots, and building features. There is no one pattern or method in which to build a community. The City has adopted a range of zoning districts to address different needs. The zoning districts are amended from time to time as needs of the City and its residents change. Many different configurations of uses and buildings can coexist well and the City does not restrict specific architectural styles. The City’s growth policy and allowed land uses per zoning district encourage mixed uses. This proposal amends the text only and not the zoning map. The proposal does not add or delete zoning districts. The combination of uses and other characteristics remain intact and were previously found to be consistent with this criterion. Therefore, this criterion remains met. The applicant further suggests “The character of the district (NE Neighborhood) has been evolving over the last decade. There is a great mix of uses that range from single household 219 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 17 of 22 dwellings to 4-story apartment buildings, to commercial and multistory mixed use buildings. Apartments are currently allowed as an accessory use (capped at 50% of building). The proposed change would eliminate the threshold cap. Adding apartments has a permitted use (capped to second and subsequent floors) does not fundamentally change the character of the district but will allow for the creation of more units in the neighborhood, which arguably will make it more vibrant and successful. Finally, the Northeast Neighborhood Association (NENA) has been engaged in our proposed edits and supports the changes.” Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.310 Permitted Uses What can be done where in the city. Growth policy Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan, building permit 38.320.060 Zone Edge Transitions Height adjustments on the edge of some zones Site plan 38.340 Overlay District Standards Historic preservation SOI Standards for Historic Preservation, Design Guidelines for Historic Preservation Site plan and building permit 38.5 Project Design Site layouts, landscaping, building configuration, signs, lighting Site plan and building permit I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Criterion met. Apartments are already allowed in the NEHMU district. The amendments will allow residential uses as a primary use in buildings on the second and subsequent floors and basements only. Ground floor residential will not be allowed in buildings, only lobbies associated with residential uses would be allowed on the ground floor. New development will continue to be processed according to the BMC as it is now in this district. This amendment 220 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 18 of 22 will not affect the suitability of uses in the NEHMU district. In essence, the proposed amendment changes the NEHMU district from a mix of the M-1 and R-2 zoning districts when it was originally created to a blend of M-1 and R-4 zoning districts. As apartments are currently allowed, although on a more limited basis, the amendment does not alter the earlier decisions that NEHMU is appropriate with a mix of uses in this area. Municipal Code Section and Title Subject Related Documents When standard is applied 38.310 Permitted Uses What can be done where in the city. Growth policy Subdivision, site plan review, building permit 38.320 Form and Intensity Standards Standards for building placement and maximum size Subdivision, site plan review, building permit 38.600 Natural Resource Protection Protect watercourses and wetlands FEMA Floodplain study Subdivision, site plan review, building permit J. Conserving the value of buildings. Criterion met. The proposed amendments may alter the use of existing buildings; however, any proposal will need to be in compliance with standards outlined in the BMC. Site specific review for compliance with standards prior to construction will continue to be required. This amendment is consistent with the growth policy including the future land use map, see Criterion A. Therefore, the criterion is met. K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Criterion met. See the discussion under Criterion A as well. The zoning map and the future land use map of the growth policy identify areas where specific uses are generally appropriate. The proposed amendment allows for an increase in residential area in buildings where such uses are already allowed. Higher intensity of uses and residences on upper floors are encouraged in appropriate circumstances within the Community Commercial Mixed Use designation. The applicant further states “Community Commercial Mixed Use calls for a mix of uses, with multistory buildings and residential on upper stories of the building. Changing apartments from an accessory use to a permitted use (on upper floors) directly speaks to this goal of the CCMU district. Additionally, this will help promote and build upon the vibrancy of the neighborhood.” 221 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 19 of 22 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s) of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, a sufficient protest must: (i) state the writing is a “protest”, rather than merely expressing opposition; (ii) contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the protest is lodged; and (iii) contain the application number and a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including listing all owners of the property and the physical address), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of property affected by the action. Signers are encour aged to print their names after their signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to final action by the City Commission. Protests must be delivered to the Bozeman City Clerk, 121 North Rouse Ave., PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771- 1230. APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This application includes a proposal to modify the City’s development code to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area on the second and subsequent floors, and basements, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District (Northeast Historic Mixed Use District). Currently the development code only allows apartments as an accessory use that occupies less than fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the building, and not on the ground floor, only the second and subsequent floors. As seen below in the Permitted residential uses chart in commercial, mixed-use and industrial zoning districts, the applicant is requesting to replace the A⁶ with a P⁴. A⁶ in this row for Apartments means they are allowed as an accessory use with a note of ‘6’ which reads “For the purpose of this section, accessory means less than 50 percent of the gross floor area of the building, and not located on the ground floor.” Replacing it with a P⁴ is this row f or Apartments means it is allowed as a permitted use with no restrictions on area with a note of ‘4’ which reads “When located on the second or subsequent floor, or basement as defined in section 38.700.030 of this chapter. Lobbies associated with residential uses are allowed on the ground floor.” (see highlighted part below in the chart). The change would allow residential as a 222 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 20 of 22 primary use within a mixed use multi-story buildings within the NEHMU district that is currently not allowed. Table 38.310.040.C Permitted residential uses in commercial, mixed-use, and industrial zoning districts Zoning Districts Commercial Mixed Use Industrial PLI B-11 B-2 B-2M B-3 UMU (38.310.050) REMU (38.310.060) NEHMU BP M-1 M-2 General residential Accessory dwelling unit (38.360.040) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- P P --- --- --- --- Apartments*ᶟ P⁴ P⁴ P⁵ P⁵ P P A⁶ P⁴ --- A⁶ A⁶ --- Apartment buildings*ᶟ --- S P P⁵ P P --- --- --- --- --- Cottage housing* (38.360.120) --- --- --- --- --- P --- --- --- --- --- Single household dwelling (38.360.220) --- --- --- --- --- P P --- --- --- --- B-11 B-2 B-2M B-3 UMU REMU NEHMU BP M-1 M-2 PLI Three household dwelling or four household dwelling (38.360.220) --- --- --- --- --- P --- --- --- --- --- Townhouses*ᶟ & rowhouses* (38.360.250) --- S⁷ P⁷ P⁷ --- P⁸ P --- --- --- --- Two-household dwelling (38.360.220) --- --- --- --- --- P P --- --- --- --- 223 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 21 of 22 Live-work units* P P P P P P P --- --- --- --- Ground floor residential S P⁵ P⁵ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Group residences Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents* P⁴ P⁴˒⁵ P⁴˒⁵ P⁴˒⁵ P⁴˒⁵ P P --- --- --- --- Community residential facilities serving nine or more residents* --- S S --- P P --- --- --- --- --- Cooperative household* --- --- --- --- --- P S --- --- --- --- Group living (38.360.135)* P⁴ P⁴ P⁵ P⁴ --- P P --- --- --- --- Lodging houses* --- S S⁵ Sᶟ P P --- --- --- --- --- Transitional and emergency housing and related services (38.360.140)* --- S S S S S S S S --- S Notes: 1. In the B-1 district, the footprint of individual buildings must not exceed 5,000 square feet. 2. Authorized uses in the NEHMU district include those uses allowed in the R-2 district (some of which aren’t addressed in this table). 3. May be subject to the provisions of chapter 38, article 380. 4. When located on the second or subsequent floor, or basement as defined in section 38.700.030 of this chapter. Lobbies associated with residential uses are allowed on the ground floor. 5. Non-residential uses (except for lobbies associated with residential uses) are required on the ground floor to a minimum depth of 20 feet from front building façade on properties adjacent to designated storefront streets per section 38.500.010. 6. For the purpose of this section, accessory means less than 50 percent of the gross floor area of the building, and not located on the ground floor. 7. Five or more attached units. 8. Five or fewer attached units. 224 Staff Report for the NEHMU Zone Text Amendment Page 22 of 22 The northeast historic mixed use district is located in the northeast section of the city that encompasses approximately 40 acres and is located within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. The intent of the northeast historic mixed use district is to provide recognition of an area that has developed with a blend of uses not commonly seen under typical zoning requirements. The unique qualities and nature of the area are not found elsewhere in the city and should be preserved as a place offering additional opportunities for creative integration of land uses. The intent of this area is to allow private and case-by-case determination of the most appropriate use of land in a broad range of both non-residential and residential uses. During the development and adoption of the Bozeman Community Plan 2020 (BCP 2020) the underlying Future Land Use designation was modified from Industrial to Community Commercial Mixed Use. This action paved the way for subsequent zoning changes that differ from the prevailing historical uses of the area and indicate a shift in character over time. NEHMU is currently an implementing district of the Community Commercial Mixed Use land use designation. APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice for text amendments must meet the standards of 38.220.410 & 420 . Notice was published in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on 6/22/2024, 7/06/2024, and 8/10/2024 and contained all required elements. The notice and text were also provided through the City’s Community Development web viewer. Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the City Commission public hearing. That hearing is tentatively scheduled for August 27, 2024. No written public comments have been received so far on this Ordinance. Comments are available through the Laserfiche archive. If comments are received, they will be placed in the project folder in Laserfiche. APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Applicant: Tyler Steinway, Intrinsik Architecture, 106 E Babcock Su. 1A, Bozeman, MT 59715 Representative: Erik Nelson, Nest Partners, 113 E Oak Street 4B, Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Elizabeth Cramblet, Associate Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Zone Text Amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. The application materials for this application are available at Laserfiche folder [External link]. 225 Version February 2023 Ord. 2161 Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE 2168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA AMENDING TABLE 38.310.040.C OF CHAPTER 38 OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW APARTMENTS AS A PERMITTED USE WITH NO RESTRICTIONS IN AREA ON THE SECOND AND SUBSEQUENT FLOORS, AND BASEMENTS OF BUILDINGS, AND TO ALLOW LOBBIES ON THE GROUND FLOOR WHEN ASSOCIATED WITH RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE NEHMU DISTRICT (NORTHEAST HISTORIC MIXED USE DISTRICT), APPLICATION 24225. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman (the “City”) has adopted land development and use standards to protect public health, safety and welfare and otherwise execute the purposes of Montana Code Annotated §§ 76-1-102, 76-2-304, 76-3-102, and 76-3-501; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bozeman City Charter, the City of Bozeman has adopted and is hereby relying upon its self-government powers recognizing pursuant to Montana law such self- government powers must be liberally construed in favor of such power; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 38, Section 38.260.010.A of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC), Bangtail Partners, LLC, Nest Partners submitted application number 24225 for a specific zoning text amendment for Table 38.310.040.C to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area on the second and subsequent floors, and basements of buildings, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to BMC Section 38.260.020, upon receipt of such application, the Community Development Department initiated the required investigation of facts bearing on such proposed amendment to ensure that the action is consistent with the intent and purposes of Chapter 38, Section 38.100.040 to protect health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, on July 15, 2024, the Bozeman Community Development Board, acting as the Bozeman Zoning Commission, voted to recommend ______________ to the Bozeman City Commission; and 226 Ordinance No. 2161, Amend Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Alley Rear Yard Setback Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 38.220.420 and 38.260.030, public notice of the July 15, 2024 public hearing on the proposed amendment before the Community Development Board and of the August 27, 2024 public hearing before the Bozeman City Commission was given by publication in a general circulation newspaper on June 22, 2024, July 6, 2024, and August 10, 2024, which is not less than 15 or more than 45 calendar days prior to the public hearings; and WHEREAS, after proper notice, the City Commission held its public hearing on August 27, 2024, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed and considered the applicable amendment criteria established in Montana Code Annotated (MCA) § 76-2-304, considered the Community Development Board recommendation, and all the information presented by staff and the Applicant at the July 15, 2024 public hearing, and found that the proposed amendments to Table 38.310.040.C presented by the Applicant was preferred to that recommended by the Community Development Board and found that the Applicant’s zone text amendment is ___ compliance with the MCA criteria; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA: Section 1 Legislative Findings The City Commission hereby makes the following findings in support of adoption of this Ordinance: 1. The City adopted a growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan 2020, by Resolution 5133 to establish policies for development of the community including zoning; 2. The Bozeman Community Plan 2020, Chapter 5, sets forth the policies by which the City reviews and applies the criteria for amendment of zoning established in 76-2-305, MCA; 3. Zoning, including text amendments, must be in accordance with an adopted growth policy; 4. A staff report analyzing the required criteria for a zone text amendment, including accordance to the Bozeman Community Plan 2020, has found that the required criteria are satisfied; 5. The two required public hearings were advertised as required in state law and municipal code and all persons have had opportunity to review the materials applicable to the application and provide comment prior to a decision; 6. The Bozeman Community Development Board as the Zoning Commission has been established as required in state law and conducted their required public hearing; and after 227 Ordinance No. 2161, Amend Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Alley Rear Yard Setback Page 3 of 7 consideration of application materials, staff analysis and report, and all submitted public comment recommended approval of the application. 7. The City Commission conducted a public hearing to provide all interested parties the opportunity to provide evidence and testimony regarding the proposed amendment prior to the City Commission acting on the application. 8. The City Commission considered the application materials, staff analysis and report, the Community Development Board recommendation, all information presented by staff and the Applicant, and all other relevant information. 9. The City Commission determines that, as set forth in the staff report and incorporating the staff findings, Community Development Board’s amendment and recommendation, and staff and Applicant presentation at the public hearing as part of their decision, the required criteria for approval of the proposed Bozeman Unified Development Code (UDC) Table 38.310.040.C text amendment to allow apartments as a permitted use with no restrictions in area on the second and subsequent floors, and basements of buildings, and to allow lobbies on the ground floor when associated with residential uses in the NEHMU District. Section 2 Table 38.310.040.C—Permitted residential uses in commercial, mixed use, and industrial zoning districts. Permitted uses for the NEHMU District—shall be amended to read as follows with all other elements of the table and footnotes remaining unchanged. Zoning Districts Commercial Mixed Use Industrial PLI B-11 B-2 B-2M B-3 UMU (38.310.050) REMU (38.310.060) NEHMU BP M-1 M-2 General residential Accessory dwelling unit (38.360.040) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- P P --- --- --- --- Apartments*ᶟ P⁴ P⁴ P⁵ P⁵ P P A⁶ P⁴ --- A⁶ A⁶ --- Apartment buildings*ᶟ --- S P P⁵ P P --- --- --- --- --- 228 Ordinance No. 2161, Amend Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Alley Rear Yard Setback Page 4 of 7 Cottage housing* (38.360.120) --- --- --- --- --- P --- --- --- --- --- Single household dwelling (38.360.220) --- --- --- --- --- P P --- --- --- --- B-11 B-2 B-2M B-3 UMU REMU NEHMU BP M-1 M-2 PLI Three household dwelling or four household dwelling (38.360.220) --- --- --- --- --- P --- --- --- --- --- Townhouses*ᶟ & rowhouses* (38.360.250) --- S⁷ P⁷ P⁷ --- P⁸ P --- --- --- --- Two-household dwelling (38.360.220) --- --- --- --- --- P P --- --- --- --- Live-work units* P P P P P P P --- --- --- --- Ground floor residential S P⁵ P⁵ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Group residences Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents* P⁴ P⁴˒⁵ P⁴˒⁵ P⁴˒⁵ P⁴˒⁵ P P --- --- --- --- Community residential facilities serving nine or more residents* --- S S --- P P --- --- --- --- --- Cooperative household* --- --- --- --- --- P S --- --- --- --- Group living (38.360.135)* P⁴ P⁴ P⁵ P⁴ --- P P --- --- --- --- 229 Ordinance No. 2161, Amend Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Alley Rear Yard Setback Page 5 of 7 Lodging houses* --- S S⁵ Sᶟ P P --- --- --- --- --- Transitional and emergency housing and related services (38.360.140)* --- S S S S S S S S --- S Notes: 1. In the B-1 district, the footprint of individual buildings must not exceed 5,000 square feet. 2. Authorized uses in the NEHMU district include those uses allowed in the R-2 district (some of which aren’t addressed in this table). 3. May be subject to the provisions of chapter 38, article 380. 4. When located on the second or subsequent floor, or basement as defined in section 38.700.030 of this chapter. Lobbies associated with residential uses are allowed on the ground floor. 5. Non-residential uses (except for lobbies associated with residential uses) are required on the ground floor to a minimum depth of 20 feet from front building façade on properties adjacent to designated storefront streets per section 38.500.010. 6. For the purpose of this section, accessory means less than 50 percent of the gross floor area of the building, and not located on the ground floor. 7. Five or more attached units. 8. Five or fewer attached units. Section 3 Repealer. All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4 Savings Provision. This ordinance does not affect the rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this ordinance. All other 230 Ordinance No. 2161, Amend Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Alley Rear Yard Setback Page 6 of 7 provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code not amended by this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5 Severability. That should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Bozeman Municipal Code as a whole. Section 6 Codification. The provisions of Section 2 of this Ordinance shall be codified as appropriate in the Bozeman Municipal Code. Section 7 Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after final adoption. 231 Ordinance No. 2161, Amend Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Alley Rear Yard Setback Page 7 of 7 ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, on first reading at a regular session held on the 27th day of August, 2024. ____________________________________ TERENCE CUNNINGHAM Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk FINALLY PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana on second reading at a regular session thereof held on the ___ of ____________________, 2024. The effective date of this ordinance is ______________, 2024. _________________________________ TERENCE CUNNINGHAM Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ MIKE MAAS City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 232 Memorandum REPORT TO:City Commission FROM:Alex Newby, Deputy City Clerk Mike Maas, City Clerk Chuck Winn, Interim City Manager SUBJECT:Appointment to the Library Board of Trustees MEETING DATE:August 27, 2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE:Citizen Advisory Board/Commission RECOMMENDATION:Consider the Motion: I move to appoint one member to the Library Board of Trustees for a term ending June 30, 2029. STRATEGIC PLAN:1.2 Community Engagement: Broaden and deepen engagement of the community in city government, innovating methods for inviting input from the community and stakeholders. BACKGROUND:The Library Board of Trustees currently has one vacancy due to a term expiring on June 30, 2023. Two applications have been received. The Library Board of Trustees is created under Section 22-1-308 of the Montana Code Annotated and Section 2.05.350 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Under Section 2.05.350 of the B.M.C., the Board of Trustees of the Public Library shall be composed of five persons and shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the advice and consent of the Commission, and shall serve without pay. The trustees shall hold their office for the term of five years, and one trustee shall be appointed annually at the beginning of each fiscal year (July 1) for the term of five years, and until his/her successor is appointed and qualifies. Trustees shall serve no more than two full terms in succession. They shall have power to select librarians and other employees as they may determine and fix the amount of any bond which they may require to be given by the librarian and other employees. They shall have power to receive books from all sources for the use and benefit of the library and to purchase books therefore with any money available for that purpose and power to prescribe all rules and regulations for the use of books and the preservation of the same. The board shall keep a record of its transactions and shall make a report to the City Commission at the close of each calendar year, covering the business transacted by it during the year (Ordinance No. 1163, 1984; Ordinance No. 1094 S 1, 1982; prior code S 2.08.200). No residency requirements are contained in either the M.C.A. or the B.M.C. Under state 233 statutes, this Board is administrative. This board currently has one vacancy. The City Clerk’s Office has received one application with their relevant qualifications below. 1. One position with a term expiring June 30, 2029 | Qualifies: M. Pomeroy, J. Long, W. Locke Applicant: Melissa Pomeroy John "Mike" Long William Locke UNRESOLVED ISSUES:Commissioner Jennifer Madgic is the City Commission liaison for this board. Library Board of Trustees appointments are Mayoral appointments with the advice and consent of the Commission. ALTERNATIVES:As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS:None. Attachments: 04-26-24 - CAB Applications - William Locke.pdf 04-22-24 - CAB Applications - John Long.pdf 04-16-24 - CAB Applications - Melissa Pomeroy.pdf Report compiled on: August 14, 2024 234 WELCOME Thank you for your interest in joining a City Board. The City of Bozeman elected officials and staff believe in the value of public participation and local governance in the decision-making process and encourage all interested members of our community to apply. As set forth in Resolution 5323, the City is committed to building Boards that advance the City’s goals of increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion. Because of this goal, the City is actively working to achieve membership that reflects, at the least, the demographics of our community. Women, minorities, individuals with disabilities, veterans, and other underrepresented groups are encouraged to apply. CONTACT INFORMATION The City will need to communicate with all board members via email for a number of annual communications, so a valid email address is required for all applicants. Please notify the City Clerks' Office if your email address changes for any reason. The City will need to communicate with all board members via email for a number of annual communications, so a valid email address is required for all applicants. Please notify the City Clerks' Office if your email address changes for any reason. Please note that your application will become public information. All required fields are marked with a red asterisk *. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT Each official and employee serving on a multimember agency is expected to devote the time and effort necessary to ensure the successful functioning of such agency (Bozeman Municipal Code, Section 2.03.490.C.). Additional standards of conduct and norms are included in Resolution 5323. Applicant Information * Full Name William Locke * Residential Address 2119 Sourdough Road Bozeman MT 59715 * Primary Phone (406) 570-9378 * Current Occupation Retired emeritus faculty * Employer Montana State University Department of Earth Sciences * Email wwlocke3@gmail.com Which position are you applying for? Library Board of Trustees Do you live in City Limits? (Some positions do require you live within Bozeman city limits, while others do not.) Yes How long have you lived in the Bozeman Area? 11 years or more * Have you ever served on a City or County Board or Commission? No Where, how long, and what Board? **SKIPPED** * Please describe your professional and personal experiences, interest, and qualifications that make you a good fit for this board. Served as Board member and officer of BS Wind Drinkers, FC Bozeman/Blitzz/Montana Surf. First paid job was moving and reserving a college library, and served as MSU Map Librarian for a decade. Long-tome library card holder (42 yr), donor, and volunteer. As an Earth Scientist, I am used to a long view rather than a hurried response to urgent (but not critically important) issues of the day. * The City of Bozeman strongly values diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Describe any efforts you have engaged in to expand your understanding of DEI. I am an old, fat white guy! But at least I know it. I am a fiscal conservative but a social liberal (so I affiliate with no party). One of the best people in my life was my Army First Sergeant (Black, high school dropout), so I am well aware that the measure of a person has nothing to do with their exterior. References Page | 1 235 Please provide name, phone, and email contact information for two references. * Reference #1 Full Name Janay Johnson * Phone (406) 579-2208 * Email janay@bozemanlibraryfoundation.org * Reference #2 Full Name Chet Work * Phone (208) 709-3141 * Email chet@gvlt.org * The Bozeman City Charter, voted in by the citizens of Bozeman in 2008, requires annual ethics training. If appointed, do you understand you will be expected to take online and in person ethics training? Yes How did you hear about this board or vacancy? From Janay Johnson (BPL Foundation Director) Is there any other information that you feel we need to know? In the context of current events, I believe everyone has the right to their beliefs (if not criminal). Every parent has the right to pass their beliefs to their children. But no one has the right to control what other people, or their children, can see, learn, or believe. If you have a disability that requires assistance or need accommodations, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Mike Gray, at 406.582.3232 (TDD 406.582.2301). Please note that for most City Boards, materials are distributed electronically for each meeting. Your application and all information submitted is considered a public record. All applications are included in the City Commission’s Meeting materials for consideration which are electronically archived and available to the public. Page | 2 236 WELCOME Thank you for your interest in joining a City Board. The City of Bozeman elected officials and staff believe in the value of public participation and local governance in the decision-making process and encourage all interested members of our community to apply. As set forth in Resolution 5323, the City is committed to building Boards that advance the City’s goals of increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion. Because of this goal, the City is actively working to achieve membership that reflects, at the least, the demographics of our community. Women, minorities, individuals with disabilities, veterans, and other underrepresented groups are encouraged to apply. CONTACT INFORMATION The City will need to communicate with all board members via email for a number of annual communications, so a valid email address is required for all applicants. Please notify the City Clerks' Office if your email address changes for any reason. The City will need to communicate with all board members via email for a number of annual communications, so a valid email address is required for all applicants. Please notify the City Clerks' Office if your email address changes for any reason. Please note that your application will become public information. All required fields are marked with a red asterisk *. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT Each official and employee serving on a multimember agency is expected to devote the time and effort necessary to ensure the successful functioning of such agency (Bozeman Municipal Code, Section 2.03.490.C.). Additional standards of conduct and norms are included in Resolution 5323. Applicant Information * Full Name John Long * Residential Address 1640 Kenyon Drive Bozeman Montana 59715 * Primary Phone (406) 989-0246 * Current Occupation retired * Employer see above * Email jmikel@me.com Which position are you applying for? Library Board of Trustees Do you live in City Limits? (Some positions do require you live within Bozeman city limits, while others do not.) Yes How long have you lived in the Bozeman Area? 11 years or more * Have you ever served on a City or County Board or Commission? Yes Where, how long, and what Board? Dawson County Library Board. 10 years * Please describe your professional and personal experiences, interest, and qualifications that make you a good fit for this board. I have a 42-year history of Clinical Laboratory Management across various hospitals in Montana - the last 15 years were at Bozeman Health. As stated above, I have served on a library board elsewhere. I am extremely literate, read voraciously and firmly believe that free, public and uncensored libraries are an important defining element of what allows us to call ourselves civilized. Free access to books saved my life as a youth when my situation was intolerable and reading was my only escape * The City of Bozeman strongly values diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Describe any efforts you have engaged in to expand your understanding of DEI. I am in a same-sex marriage. My husband and I raised a son (quite successfully) in Bozeman. We have been plaintiffs in a law suit in Montana which argued for recognition of both civil unions and same-sex marriage. I understand DEI because I've lived it from the inside out. References Page | 1 237 Please provide name, phone, and email contact information for two references. * Reference #1 Full Name Ken Spencer * Phone (406) 570-6378 * Email Kens8668@gmail.com * Reference #2 Full Name Jen Gummer * Phone (406) 579-5516 * Email momrulz2@hotmail.com * The Bozeman City Charter, voted in by the citizens of Bozeman in 2008, requires annual ethics training. If appointed, do you understand you will be expected to take online and in person ethics training? Yes How did you hear about this board or vacancy? I proactively reached out to a current board member (Ken Spencer) expressing interest. Is there any other information that you feel we need to know? One motivation for my interest is that I am extremely happy with the Bozeman City Library in its current form. I want to be able to participate in both keeping it the wonderful institution that it is and in helping guide it forward into the future. If you have a disability that requires assistance or need accommodations, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Mike Gray, at 406.582.3232 (TDD 406.582.2301). Please note that for most City Boards, materials are distributed electronically for each meeting. Your application and all information submitted is considered a public record. All applications are included in the City Commission’s Meeting materials for consideration which are electronically archived and available to the public. Page | 2 238 WELCOME Thank you for your interest in joining a City Board. The City of Bozeman elected officials and staff believe in the value of public participation and local governance in the decision-making process and encourage all interested members of our community to apply. As set forth in Resolution 5323, the City is committed to building Boards that advance the City’s goals of increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion. Because of this goal, the City is actively working to achieve membership that reflects, at the least, the demographics of our community. Women, minorities, individuals with disabilities, veterans, and other underrepresented groups are encouraged to apply. CONTACT INFORMATION The City will need to communicate with all board members via email for a number of annual communications, so a valid email address is required for all applicants. Please notify the City Clerks' Office if your email address changes for any reason. The City will need to communicate with all board members via email for a number of annual communications, so a valid email address is required for all applicants. Please notify the City Clerks' Office if your email address changes for any reason. Please note that your application will become public information. All required fields are marked with a red asterisk *. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT Each official and employee serving on a multimember agency is expected to devote the time and effort necessary to ensure the successful functioning of such agency (Bozeman Municipal Code, Section 2.03.490.C.). Additional standards of conduct and norms are included in Resolution 5323. Applicant Information * Full Name Melissa Pomeroy * Residential Address 3144 Wagon Wheel Rd Unit 38 Bozeman MT 59715 * Primary Phone (440) 463-0133 * Current Occupation Curator * Employer Montana State University * Email pomemel@yahoo.com Which position are you applying for? Library Board of Trustees Do you live in City Limits? (Some positions do require you live within Bozeman city limits, while others do not.) Yes How long have you lived in the Bozeman Area? 6-10 years * Have you ever served on a City or County Board or Commission? No Where, how long, and what Board? **SKIPPED** * Please describe your professional and personal experiences, interest, and qualifications that make you a good fit for this board. In recent years have had the privilege of getting to know the Bozeman book community much better. In 2021 I began working at the Country Bookshelf while I pursued my Master of Library and Information Science (completed in December of 2022). Since graduating I have had the privilege of working with dedicated librarians at the MSU library. I think it is important to have a dedicated board who will weigh the needs of the community with the resources available. * The City of Bozeman strongly values diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Describe any efforts you have engaged in to expand your understanding of DEI. As the population of Bozeman grows, so does our diversity and the need to be aware of changing community needs. I have engaged with that community on MSU campus by partnering with the Diversity and Inclusion Student Commons to plan events, and it is my intention to continue to listen to the needs of those communities to help them the best I can. Page | 1 239 References Please provide name, phone, and email contact information for two references. * Reference #1 Full Name Jodi Allison-Bunnell * Phone (406) 994-5297 * Email jodi.allisonbunnell@montana.edu * Reference #2 Full Name Holoakea Husen * Phone (541) 231-6642 * Email husenholoakea@gmail.com * The Bozeman City Charter, voted in by the citizens of Bozeman in 2008, requires annual ethics training. If appointed, do you understand you will be expected to take online and in person ethics training? Yes How did you hear about this board or vacancy? from Jennifer Pawlak Is there any other information that you feel we need to know? I would consider it a privilege to serve our community by sitting on the Board of Trustees for Bozeman Public Library. I have long been an enthusiastic patron, and love the recent updates to the building and their services. I would love to be a part of their continued growth. If you have a disability that requires assistance or need accommodations, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Mike Gray, at 406.582.3232 (TDD 406.582.2301). Please note that for most City Boards, materials are distributed electronically for each meeting. Your application and all information submitted is considered a public record. All applications are included in the City Commission’s Meeting materials for consideration which are electronically archived and available to the public. Page | 2 240 August 19, 2024 Paula Gilbert Property Assessment Division Montana Department of Revenue RE: Taxable Value for the 2024 Tax Year Dear Paula, Thank you for your letter dated 8/15/24 explaining the causes behind the decrease in certified taxable value for the 2024 tax year for jurisdictions within Gallatin County. We sincerely appreciate the Department of Revenue’s efforts during a time period where property tax fatigue and angst is elevated statewide. The impact of the failure to fully capture new construction in our certified values will have a significant impact on our jurisdictions taxpayers, property tax revenues, and budgets. If taxes are levied based on these incorrect certified values, existing property owners are likely to pay higher tax bills while newly taxable properties may avoid payments until 2025. Doing so will also cause revenue shortfalls for some jurisdictions, which may result in a lower level of service to the communities. These impacts are not acceptable to our elected officials, administrators, and constituents. We take these tax implications very seriously. While we truly appreciate your work over the last year in developing certified values, we would like to formally request your support and collaboration in an effort to correct our newly taxable values in advance of tax bills being mailed in October. We appreciate your willingness to meet with us and look forward to continued collaboration in working toward the fair treatment of our jurisdictions taxpayers. Sincerely, _______________________________ Chuck Winn, City Manager City of Bozeman _______________________________ Casey Bertram, Superintendent Bozeman School District _______________________________ Jim Doar, County Administrator Gallatin County _______________________________ Neil Cardwell, City Manager City of Belgrade _______________________________ Dede Semerad, Superintendent Belgrade School District Docusign Envelope ID: 055201A0-1C7F-469F-BFE0-E641A897F628 197241 Name:Contractor #:Affirmation Form:Bid Bond:Base Bid Total: Central Plumbing and Heating Excavation 437 Foss Flats Road Belgrade, MT 59714 4443 X X $369,932.00 Battle Ridge Builders 354 Countryside Ln. Belgrade, MT 59714 163642 X X $424,680.00 Sime Construction 190 Ramshorn Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718 5354 X X $382,047.00 Mike Maas Russ Smith City Clerk Project Coordinator Bid Check:Delivered to Finance:Accepted By:Date: BID - 2024 Stormwater Improvements E. Peach St and E. Tamarack These bids were opened and read before the undersigned at 2:00 pm on Thursday, June 20, 2024. DocuSign Envelope ID: 1A547C41-030D-4091-83D9-A0C5C65AAE77 7242