Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-20-24 Public Comment - B. Tudsbury - Site Plan#22047From:Brett Tudsbury To:Agenda Subject:[EXTERNAL]Site Plan#22047 Date:Monday, February 19, 2024 2:53:44 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To the Bozeman City Commission, From a nearby resident and homeowner at 3715 Ellis View Loop (Brett and Jeannette Tudsbury) I am writing to express my concern over the recent approval Site Plan #22047 in the Sundance Spring Subdivision. The Director of Community Development erred in approving the plan. The City has the obligation and authority to protect our open spaces, our trail systems, and our neighborhoods from incompatible development. I have lived in Sundance Springs and Ellis View Estates since 2003. This is my neighborhood and community. It's very troubling that the city has a recent history without regard for laws and covenants. This site plan doesn't have one thing in it resembling anything in the Sundance Springs PUD and covenants. This is just another unlawful development and property rights taking in the City of Bozeman. The citizens of Bozeman have lost all confidence in your leadership, and your disregard for laws and common sense. We are sick and tired of you turning our city into a high density infill project. We don't need more multiple story buildings with more traffic problems, noise pollution, and parking issues. This is just another example of the city trying to tell us what they think is best for us. Bozeman is getting uglier by the day, and is not the place I moved to 26 years ago. For 25 years, the City has enforced the The Sundance Spring PUD, which provides strong protection for the public open spaces that were incorporated into the subdivision. Now, that the formal record of the PUD's requirements is missing, suddenly, the City Attorney and Community Development Director are redefining the terms of the PUD by hand- selecting limited pieces of the public record (namely, just the Commission's Conditions of Approval for the PUD's preliminary application) to represent the terms of the PUD. Other evidence of the PUD's requirements in the public record are being ignored. The City Attorney claims, without access to the approved final plan, that he knows the terms of the PUD better than experienced planners who actually reviewed the PUD's Approved Final Plan when they made their determinations. Case and point is the 2020 Concept Review for the Site Plan in question. In 2020, when the Approved Final Plans was available to consult, the City Planner concluded that the PUD's Master Plan implemented the B-1 District from the 1992 zoning ordinance. Now that the Approved Final Plan is missing, the City Attorney claims, without evidence, that the planner was in error, and the City attorney states that the historical zoning does not apply. When authoritative documents go missing, it is customary to look to the remainder of the public record assuming it is factual and correct in order understand what the missing documents required. Instead, the city is using the uncertainty associated with the loss of the Approved Final Plan as an excuse to overturn long-standing policies of the City. For 25 years, while the Approved Final Plan existed, the City has enforced of the Sundance Springs PUD Master Plan and Covenants & Development Guidelines. And now that the Approved Final Plan is missing, the City has reversed its long- held position and claims that the surviving Master Plan map is a "Concept Sketch" and that Covenants & Development Guidelines are "private agreements" that need not be enforced. Bozeman now feels like a lawless wild west of development, where developers push the City relentlessly to ignore the purpose and intent of the Unified Development Code and insist that Staff take a reductionist approach to interpreting the code. Enough is enough. It's time the start enforcing the code with the City, not the developers, calling the shots. It's time to put necessary teeth back in enforcement to ensure that developments like Site Plan #22047 don't get approved until they are fully compliant the the UCD. The developer has reached approval by obfuscated the requirements of the PUD while making a mockery of the intent of the Block Frontage Standards. There has been a lot of talk, lately, about the need for City Government to rebuild trust with the residents of this City. Overturning the errant decision of a seemingly politically-motivated Director of Community Development seems like a good place to start rebuilding trust. Trust is built when government does what it said it will do. 25 years ago, the City Commission approved the Sundance Spring PUD, and in doing so, provided assurances that the Master Plan and Covenants & Development Guidelines would be enforced. It's time to make good on those assurances. The City has all of the authority is needs to protect open spaces and public trails, promote public safety, and enforce the intent of the UDC. I am asking you to make the decision to reassert your authority over the development chaos that grips this City. You can begin that process today by overturning the approval of Site Plan #22047. Brett Tudsbury Broker | 406.209.4500btudsbury@fastmail.com www.bozemanrealestate.group