HomeMy WebLinkAbout010_City conversation about Durston ROW Tim Staub
From: Taylor Lonsdale <tlonsdale@BOZEMAN.NET>
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 10:48 AM
To: M Nahorniak; Ross Knapper; Nakeisha Lyon; Lance Lehigh
Cc: Tim Staub
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons - 21034
Attachments: ATT00001.txt;ATT00002.htm
Good morning. Lance and I discussed this and have determined that we need 45' of right of way for Durston Rd. We
apologize for the delay and appreciate that you understand our situation of being completely overstretched.
T2 3/lo� : o°�,s�d�31�, PE I Transportation Engineer
City of Bozeman
0: 406.582.2286
pronouns: he\him\his
From: M Nahorniak<mnahorniak@chengineers.com>
Sent:Thursday, December 2, 20219:37 AM
To: Ross Knapper<rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>;Taylor Lonsdale <tlonsdale@BOZEMAN.NET>; Nakeisha Lyon
<nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET>; Lance Lehigh <Ilehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc:Tim Staub<tstaub@chengineers.com>
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons- 21034
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning all,
As the property owner, I just wanted to reach out and hopefully get some direction on this ROW issue so we can finish
up the full city site plan submittal and hopefully still be able to start construction this spring/early summer. I completely
understand that delays are expected, but we have been at a standstill for 5 weeks as we have waited direction on this
single issue. Please advise so we can continue moving forward as efficiently as possible.
Thanks,
Mark Nahorniak, E.I.
www.chengineers.com
Uncommon Dedication o Est.2994
I W--LMWII o Civil Engineering o Geotechnical Engineering
o Structural Engineering o Floodplain Delineation
o Land Surveying o Soil&Concrete Testing
Engineering and Surveying Inc. o Subdivision Design o Environmental Site Assessments
lost Suxw dge Drre•8ore.nan,MT 59718 o Water System Design o Site Grading&Drainage Plans
Phone(406) 1 as•Fat dwesra sws co corn e
+atirw t�:r�r ,s,com�infoQ� o Septic System Design o Storm Water Plans(SWPPP)
"This message and/or attachment contains confidential information. Distribution of this
information must be only to those of C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc employees or
1
individuals contractually approved to receive this information. If you are not the
addressee and/or are not authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use,
copy, disclose, forward, print or take any action based on this message or any information
herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately
by reply e-mail and delete this message. "
From:Tim Staub<tstaub@chengineers.com>
Sent:Wednesday, December 1, 2021 10:04 AM
To: Lance Lehigh<Ilehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>; Ross Knapper<rknapper(c@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlvon@BOZEMAN.NET>;Taylor Lonsdale<tlonsdale@BOZEMAN.NET>; M Nahorniak
<mnahorniak@chengineers.com>
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons-21034
Hi Lance and Taylor,
I am just curious if a determination regarding 45'vs 50' ROW dedication has been made on this Nahorniak Commons
Master Site Plan.
Thank you,
Tim
From: Lance Lehigh <Ilehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>
Sent:Tuesday, November 16, 2021 9:03 AM
To:Tim Staub<tstaub@chengineers.com>; Ross Knapper<rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlvon@BOZEMAN.NET>;Taylor Lonsdale<tlonsdale@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons-21034
Tim we have looked into this. I want to touch base with Taylor. My biggest issues is the other properties should have
dedicated 50 feet vs the 45 feet. I want to confirm with Taylor that we are ok with the 45 for the future road cross
section. Sorry, we are trying to fit this in with all of the other reviews in the queue.
Lance
City of Bozeman 11d1T
Lance Lehigh, PE, CFM I Interim City Engineer
From:Tim Staub<tstaub@chengineers.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 16, 2021 8:59 AM
To: Ross Knapper<rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>; Lance Lehigh<Ilehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons-21034
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Ross,
Do you know whether Chris Saunders has had a chance to review the information regarding the additional 5' of ROW
requirement at Nahorniak Commons on Durston Road?
2
Thanks,
Tim
From: Ross Knapper<rl<napper@BOZEMAN.NET>
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 10:42 AM
To:Tim Staub<tstaub(@chengineers.com>; Lance Lehigh <1lehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons-21034
Hi Tim,
We have forwarded your question about the easement width to Chris Saunders for some additional input. I'm waiting to
hear what Chris's comments are before I schedule a meeting. I'll keep you posted.
ao p ; Development Review Coordinator, Community Development
City of Bozeman 120 East Olive St. I P.O. Box 1230 1 Bozeman, MT 59771
406.582.2968 1 (C) 406.451.6803 1 rknapper(c loozeman.net I www.bozeman.net
The City has enhanced our project intake process and will now be receiving all project submittals-New and Revisions,
through ProjectDox. As a result of this transition in process, response times to inquiries may be delayed. We understand
the impacts any delay may create for your site development and we will make every effort to provide you with the
highest level of customer service in a timely manner.
We encourage you to review our Development Center webpage and become familiar with the new intake process. Your
patience during this transition is greatly appreciated.
From:Tim Staub<tstaub@chengineers.com>
Sent:Wednesday, November 3, 2021 2:18 PM
To: Lance Lehigh<Ilehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Nakeisha Lyon <nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET>; Ross Knapper<rknapper@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: RE: Nahorniak Commons-21034
CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Lance,
Just following up on this question regarding the Nahorniak Commons project below.
Ross,would you be able to help set up a meeting for Lance and I to discuss this?
Thank you,
Tim Staub
From:Tim Staub
Sent:Wednesday, October 27, 2021 5:32 PM
To: 'Lance Lehigh (Ilehigh(@BOZEMAN.NET)' <Ilehigh@BOZEMAN.NET>
Cc: Nakeisha Lyon<nlyon@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: Nahorniak Commons-21034
3
Hi Lance,
I am getting back into the Nahorniak Commons site plan that you reviewed last winter. In your review letter from March
26, 2021 you had a comment on the required width of ROW dedication for Durston as being 50' (item 5 under
easements). I am wondering if that can remain 45' as it was dedicated on the attached document number 2226667. For
some reason when this property was annexed in 2019, that extra 5' didn't come up and the lot was annexed without it.
Also, I have attached the plats of numerous neighboring subdivisions that only dedicated 45'.So if we give 50' we will be
an island of 50' ROW in the sea of 45'. So at that point,what is the purpose of the extra 5'?
In this particular instance can we keep it 45 feet?
Thank you,
Tim Staub, P.E.
Project Engineer
www.chengineers.com
Uncommon Dedication o Est.1994
o Civil Engineering o Geotechnical Engineering
o Structural Engineering o Floodplain Delineation
FCO&- M
o Land Surveying o Soil&Concrete Testing
Engineering and Surveying Inc. o Subdivision Design o Environmental Site Assessments
1091 Swendgt Onw•Bwef zvu.MT 59718 o Water System Design o Site Grading&Drainage Plans
Pbone(406)587-1115•Fax[4061 587.9768 o Septic System Design o Storm Water Plans(SWPPP)
•.,eAwcbenPnoer%com•tn1oWcherg,n0frt•cC*11
"This message and/or attachment contains confidential information. Distribution of this
information must be only to those of C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc employees or
individuals contractually approved to receive this information. If you are not the
addressee and/or are not authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use,
copy, disclose, forward, print or take any action based on this message or any information
herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately
by reply e-mail and delete this message. "
4