No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300224862538770) Z-01229 Valley West Ph w Prelim. Plan PUD iA Babcock/Ferguson/Cottonwood Bozeman Lakes, LLC November21, 2002 Fci • C n b a � °'"l x h � bi '�� �� EXHIBIT A - VALLEY WEST SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY FOR STREET,IMPROVEMENTS t ' Valley West Service Area Boundary for Street Improvements r The Legal Description of the Valley West Service Area Boundary for Street Improvements is as follows: A Tract of Land located in portions of Sections 3, 9 and 10. Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Montano, being more particularly described as follows: LINE TABLE _ LINE I BEARING LENGTH Commencing of the northeast corner of said Section 9, also being the northwest corner of said Section 10, and True Point of Beginning; L5 59a00'OO W 85.00' L6 SOO'28'031Y 402.09' Thence along the West line of Section 3, North 00'47'00"East a distance of 850.00 feet; L8 S89'S1'08*W44 W z41.23; Thence South 89'59'25" East a distance of 2638.62 feet; L8 N76'06'441Y 41.23' L9 S89.51'08Y1 459.86; Thence South 89'59'25" East a distance of 804.96 feet; LID S75.54'3814 41.10' Thence South 00'47'00" West o distance of 849.93 feet, to the North line of said Section 10; Lit N89.59'42'W 174.95' Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West a distance of 174.95 feet; Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, South 00'28'03" West a distance of 2265.00 feet; Thence South 90'00'00" West a distance of 85.00 feet; Thence South 00'28'03" West a distance of 402.09 feet; Thence North 89'49'50" West a distance of 545.00 feet, to the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 10; Thence along the North-South mid-section line of said Section 10, South 00'28'03" West a distance of 1228.37 feet; Thence North 90'00'00" West a distance of 1355.39 feet; Thence South 00'00'00" West a distance of 1328.63 feet, to the North right-of-way of Highway 191; wCert Sate Section J Thence through the following five 5 courses along said North right-of-way of Highway 191; Certificate Of survey 9 9 O 9 9 Y 9 Y IIJ02 (1) Thence South 89'51'08" West a distance of 288.48 feet; Mrs..A;o AL ACRES Anders°n (2) Thence North 76'06'44" West a distance of 41.23 feet; 23.e3 AsgssAmE And M Acacs "CC" I (3) Thence South 89'51'08" West a distance of 459.86 feet; 589'S'25'E ^ S89'S9'25'E (4) Thence South 75'54'38" West a distance of 41.10 feet; 26 .s2' £1/2, W1/2, and e04.96' (5) Thence South 89'26'15" West a distance of 1823.64 feet; P.O.B. w WI/2, WI/2, Minor Section 3 less Minor SUBDIVIS/ON a Thence leaving said North right-of-way of Highway 191, North 0'40'15" East a distance of 2557.04 feet; $o Subdivision 125J o �25J Certificate DI Survey 9 9 Y 9 Y b m Christ the King IIJ02 g m Thence North 01'02'11" East a distance of 1340.70 feet; o Lutheran Churc z ACRES Douglas Lance Smith Thence South 89'19'43" West a distance of 669.96 feet; 90'R/W "X" ).869r K r ACRES 29.10 MAL ACRES 45' 2861�� ACRESThence North 01*02'11" East o distance of 289.84 feet; 89'4TO4' � " 11 ' DURSTON RD. 816.88' 9 rt;fic Thence North 24.35'59" East a distance of 437.25 feet; Or Survey Thence North 01'02'11" East o distance of 659.22 feet, to the North line of said Section 9; Certificate Of Surve :_' Certificate 0/Survey "Y"11829 11005C 11005C TRACT B Land'Documented on Special Plot, Thence along said North line of Section 9, North 89'47'04" East a distance of 1816.88 feet, to the True Point of Beginning. Certificate Or Survey I TRACT 2A ^"' TRACT J4 Hertitage SEIA Section J B IOOSB pOf VALLEY WEST L.L.C. Christian Certificate Or Survey TRACT I BURNT LEATHER -° 52.70 UnAL ACRES School tTo2 Containing 558 acres, more. or less, along with and subject to existing easements, rights-of-woy and pork dedication. RANCH 4NC. z W..ASSESAM ACRES d J60 RANCH CORPA 23.W WAL AGES 13.w RnAL ACRES / ,� Jean Lewis SOX 4L29 fOTAI ACRES j b y 60'R/W Certificate Or Survey 1z3A ACE MiDonold Land Partnership . Limited 7 ^p^ ,yy� /985 _ z.w roru Aa¢s a^� "N" 60'R/W Montana Power Co. - - L78 ASSESS 8LE AS 2'A'' 5.52 WAL "M" Certificate 0I ^GG^ o 0 N01'02'I1'E SW ASSEs54BLE ACRES Survey m'n 289.84' jJ005 B b N ^ 589.19'43 W orcel A-1 $ CertYcate Or 669.96 Valley West L.L. Survey ,.4,mm_gFES 7-ASESSABIE 11610 `_ _ TRACT A Certificate Of Survey 100 R/W- THE VECTOR IR 50' CROUP L.L.Ct*- Certificate Of Survey 110058 - 37.2E TOTAL ACRES - 11005e TRACT 5 M.56 ASSES"ASU ACRES TRACT 4 Valley West L.L.C. ` o VALLEY WEST L.L.C. ue.n mrAl Arms 40A5 TOTAL ACRES 125.42 ASSESSABLE ACRES . Z 38.61 ASSESSABLE ACRES L5 9045/W N89'49'50*W a NA 545.00' Oxford Trust SOX ,1 Delaney&CO. Inc. SOX A Portion or NE 114, "U^ 20.M rout ACRES SEIA Section 9, 17'77 ASSESSABU ACRES Certificate Of Survey o 11005 Certificate Or Survey 11872 m16 Norton Ranch Inc. Tract B p N 40.82 TCTAL ACRES o- 3e96 ACRES Michael W Delaney , WR "K" "T" lleana Indreland 9a.9a TOTAL ACRES t N m.94 ASSESSABLE ACRES J�ld "N" 55.85 ACRES W SERVICE AREA PAYBACK BOUNDARY $ N90'00'00'W b AutoPlazasor 2 1.3�3 Ro o 2«'' ;,v^ 1}55.39' A Portion oI SE1/4, SE1/4, 9-^I A "J" Ce I1846 rcte Tract 2`rNOTE: Section 9 wr 3 Michael w. Delaney& LETTERS ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES PROVIDE CORRELATION Certificate of survey�1005JI o., Ileono Indreland BETWEEN THIS BOUNDARY EXHIBIT AND THE APPLICABLEParadigm Properties "F" �. 19.56-AL ACRES ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET.17.53 TOTAL ACRESLOT 2 C,n19.23 ASSESSABLE ACRES 1).53ACRES0.91x4 ^ THIS IS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PROPERTY Certificate Of survey>nzUo o 3�. 81846 Tract I BOUNDARIES COMPILED OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM 4,�a,, "G R&0 Holding CO.19.e3 MTAI ACRES EXISTING PLATS AND CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY ON FILE AT E 3.iO1«.. 2r i« 1s.61 ASSESSABLE ACRES THE GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE INFORMATION 10 L9 to L7 DOES NOT REPRESENT A LEGAL SURVEY OF THESE BOUNDARIES OR PROPERTIES. MORRISON 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAIERLE,INC. MAI R.. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA aR4PNu scA1a,g 2'f0 spa ,099 ' PROJECT N0:2885.004 GALLATIN COUNTY, MON TANA I Iv� 1n FIELD WORK DATE:11/16/00 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/19/2003 (PRIOR r0 REDUCTION) DRAWN BY: CTD SCALE:1 =500' DRAWING NAME:N:\28a5\004yvao\EM18n'\.w.d 9 CHECKED BY•GJS CLIENT: SHEET__J_OF _L A R: ' EXHIBIT B — VALLEY WEST PAYBACK BOUNDARY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Valley West Payback Boundary for Street Improvements The Legal Description of the Valley West Payback Boundary for Street Improvements is as follows: LINE TABLE LINE I BEARING I LENGTH A Tract of Land located in portions of Sections 3 and 10, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of L1 N89'S9'251Il 45.01' Bozeman, Montano, being more particularly described as follows: L2 NOt•O6'08'E 408.0 7 u Na9 s9— 2 6ao.ao' Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 3, also being the northwest corner of said Section 10. and La so106'o91V 408.00' True Point of Beginning; Lill N89'59'42-W 174.95' Thence along the West line of said Section 3, North 00.47'00" East a distance of 850.00 feet; Thence leaving said West line of Section 3, South 89'59'25" East a distance of 2638.62 feet; Thence South 89'59'25" East a distance of 804.96 feet; Thence South 00'47'00" West o distance of 849.93 feet, to the North line of said Section 10; Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89.59'42" West o distance of 174.95 feet; Thence continuing along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West o distance of 630.01 feet, to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 10; Thence continuing along said North line of Section 10, North 89'29'25" West a distance of 738.56 feet; Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, South 00.10'31" East a distance of 881.78 feet; Thence South 88'30'24" West a distance of 639.07 feet; Thence North 00.09'34" East a distance of 898.54 feet, to said North line of Section 10; W1/2, SWi/4 Section J Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89.59'25" West a distance of 621.40 feet; Certificate 1302 survey Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, South 01'06'08" West a distance of 408.00. feet; Mrs. Eric Anderson Thence North 89'59'25" West a distance of 600.00 feet; u%i)s Tin.ACRES "CC" Thence North 01'06'08" East a distance of 408.00 feet, to said North line of Section 10; S89'5'25"E S89'59'25'E I Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'25" West a distance of 45.01 feet, to the True Point of 263.62' E1/2, W1 /2, and 804.96' Beginning. P.O.B. w W1/2, WI/2, SETA o- SUBDIO ON Section J less Minor o c Subdivision 1253 Containing 84 acres, more or less, along with and subject to existing easements, rights—of—way and park dedication. c 1253 Certificate Of Survey b m Christ the King 11302 m i Lutheran Chu rc OouglasLance Smith N a0 e.91 Tai&ACRES 2e.10 iaT&ACRES R/W Li X. ).ec ASSESSABLEACRES 45' 89.59'25 89'5912511I_�N8959'42101 L71 .n. OURSTON RD. 621.40 rti/ic 738.5 630.01' FCe3l Of Survey Certificate Of Surve Certificate O/Survey �,"Y"11829 11005C 81005C < TRACT B Land Documented on Special Plot, Certificate Of Survey TRACT 2A TRACT JA 'anA n Hertitage m S£1/4, Section 3 /10058 BURNT LEATHER VALLEY WEST L.L.C. m Christian Certificate 0/Survey TRACT 1 RANCH INC. s]sd)sss6s�EiaaEso Srhaa/ °1 81302 J60 RANCH CORP 25.60 rm&ACrffs +].00 Tm&ACras Jean Lewis SOX u.cA AssESSAeIE McDonald Land Co. Limited A129 TOT&ACRES 60'R/WOl Survey ACRES 588'30'24 W Partnership 50R ^P" 60'R 85 639.07' z.9s Tm&ACRES ^Q^ "N / Power S Certificate Of - z.)e AssEssVAE ACRES i&ALRES M SIRLE ACRES Survey �1005 B arcel A-1 Certificate Of Valley West L.L. Survey 7.41 TOT&ACRES 715 ASSESSABLE ACRE 11610 TRACT A 100'R/W THE VECTOR Certificate 5 Survey 50' CROUP LL.C. Certificate Of Survey f 1005E S).)9 IOi&,ACRES 11005B TRACT 5 v.ce ASSESSaeIE ACRES TRACT 4 Valley West C.L.C. VALLEY WEST L.L.C. A AO.AS TOT&ACRES . TOTAL OTAL A agIEE I� 3&81 ASSESSiO E ACRES 12]A)c9.A) , "L" 9045 1 ¢An. lrlcate--or-survey-3P'rZI Ox/ard Trust 50R Delaney&CO. Inc. 50R A Portion of HE 1/4, "U" 20.3 S TOT&ACRES SE1/4, Section 9, 4 ')')) SESSABLE AcaEs Certificate Of Survey 11005 Certificate Of Survey 11872 Norton Ranch Inc. Tract B • sg9B'°z TOTAL" Michael W. Delaney "K" ^T^ Ileana Indreland 9fi.99 TOT&ACRE] 54.94 ASSESSA&E AC+tES . J.C. Billion "H" 55.e5 ACRES IN SIA.BOUNDARY EOT Auto Plain O.12T aia. Subdivision ^VAA NOTE: °T°o.,, Ce tific°te o/Survey LETTERS ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES PROVIDE CORRELATION A Portion ec ion 9 Sfi/4, I "��� 11846 Tract 2 BETWEEN THIS BOUNDARY EXHIBIT AND THE APPLICABLE Section s LOT s Y ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET. Certificate o7 sane coos Michael W. Demme & Y!e a)aca Ileana Indreland Paradigm Properties "F" 2.5e Tor&ACRES THIS IS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PROPERTY 17.53 TOTAL ACRES LOT 2 19.23 A)3J ASSESSIBLE ACRES p.9]«a BOUNDARIES COMPILED OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM "A" � certificate o/survey EXISTING PLATS AND CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY ON FILE AT LS- + o a_ ;184a Tract I aLO«.. "G" R&D Holding Co. THE GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE INFORMATION 19.0 TOT&ACRE DOES NOT REPRESENT A LEGAL SURVEY'OF THESE i IA A9.81 ASSESSABLE ACRES E 3.14 2]]°'' BOUNDARIES OR PROPERTIES. �MORRISON 1/4 SEC. ACTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAIERLE,INc. �— rr4n.m PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA eRAawc seas GALLATIN 7so p l2s 7so sco +coo ' PROJECT N0:2885.004 AR COUNTY, MONTANA 1 R''�T 1n K TE:O FlELD WORK' DA 11/16/00 PLOTTED GATE: Feb/19/2003 1 ua I .coo (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) DRAWN BY: CTD SCALE:1 =500 DRAwINC NAME:N:\2ee5\004\ACM\aM19T\.uaal.4.p CHECKED BY G15 CUEN., SHEET--J--OF I EXHIBIT A - VALLEY WEST SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS The Legal Description of Valley West Service Area for Sewer Improvements is as follows: A tract of land located in portions of Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Montana, Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 9, also being the northwest corner of said Section 10. thence along the North line of said Section 9, South 89'47'04" West a distance of 420.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 00'00'35" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence South 89'59'25" East a distance of 1328.86 feet; Thence North 01'34'12" East a distance of 1412.66 feet; Thence North 90'00'00" East a distance of 797.84 feet; N89-48'40"E Thence North 00'00'00" West a distance of 364.00 feet; 917.41' Thence North 90'00'00" East a distance of 2297.00 feet; LINE TABLE Thence North 01'00'24" East a distance of 532.54 feet, UNE I BEARING LENGTH v1 n 4 L9 S89-57-00-W 73.03' o g to the East-West Mid-Section line of said Section 3; 00 S75'54'491q 41.23' e> Thence along saidEost-West Mid-Section line of Section 3, LII S8T57'00'W 19.74' N9o00'00'E "FF" m North 89'48'40" East a distance of 917.41 feet; L12 N76'06'441V 0.23' 2297.00 Thence leaving said East-West Mid-Section line of Section 3, L13 S89'51'08'w 459.86' 1. certificate Or survey South 00'03'14" East a distance of 647.59 feet; L14 S75'54'38"W 41.10' E1/2, SE]/4, Section 4, N9a O'00'E 82007 L15 NOa00'35'E 330.00' less Certificate Of Survey f1155 Robert J. Swenson Thence South 01'03'48" West a distance of 267.11 feet; L16 NoaOO'o0'W 364.00' Certificate of survey 79.ea' S. Janet7MM.ACRES Thence Thence South 01'05'50" West a distance of 401.55 feet; IIJ02 9.71 Asms,�E Anus L17 Prggy H. Metrnll- LOT 5 BLOCK 1 9.71 ACRES IN Thence South 01'59'03" East a distance of 731.02 feet; L18 SOl'OS'S0'W 401.55' 3,10 soul,,cam WI/1, SWl/4 Section J DIAMOND ESTATES PAYBACK aERVICE AREA L19 N89'48'35'E 30.00' 1.76 ASSESSABLE ALYEs certi/rcote or survey SU8Dlw9oN Thence North 89'48'35" East a distance of 30.00 feet; IIJ02 DODCIAS[ANC'SMRH !'+- ,ear rorAL ACRES Certificate or survey Thence South 01'34'00" West a distance of 594.09 feet, Mrs. Eric Anderson 14.1e AcaEs iB s6 ut 7z.97 TOTAL Ac = ,. , „L o ®Safi to the North line of said Section 10; 21."AssE55AeLE ACRES �ci 14. N Trott TB Lester L. Mengel Trustee Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West z = "BB" "CC" "EE"N a S.0000.)MAL ACLE ES a distance of 386.13 feet; FOB E1/2, w1/2, and Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, North 01'10'09" East wl/z, wl/z, sE1/a. 9 SERVICE AREA SUBOMSION Section 3 less Minor 959'42 1 cerrircote a survey a distance of 443.96 feet; Subdivision 1253 327.82' 1501 BOUNDARY B25J Certificate of survey W o. Tract 24 Thence North 89'59'42" West a distance of 327.82 feet; S89'S9'25'E Christ the King /1J02 o Hanson Irrevocable trust Thence South 01'07'29" West a distance of 443.95 feet, 1328.86' Lufheron Churc Doug/as Lance Smith -`"O1 c 1O n v e.oe Toul Aau 6.97 TOTAL ACRES e2.71 TOTAL ACRES O v '"DD"O yl 5.68 ASSESSABLE ACRES [a said North line Of Section 1 D; 90'R/W "W" X. 7s6 ASSES ABLLE m.e,ASSESSABLE ACRES as' s ` Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West 89'47'10 7 N89'59'42'W Ln DURSTON RD. 420.00'9 rti/ic 164J.82' N89'59'4711Y 1 a distance of 1643.82 feet to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 10; "Z" Of Survey 386.13 Thence along the North-South mid-section line of said Section 10, Certificate IS89'19*43W Certificate Of Survey "Y"f'18T9 �100r 11005C TRACT B i Land Documented on Special Plot, South 00'28'03" West a distance of 5209.33 feet, to the North Certificate 07 Survey TRACTa TRACT J4Hertitage SEl/4, Section J filth[-Of-Way Of HighwOy 191; 11005E BURNT L VALLEY WEST LLC. Christian Certificate Of Survey TRACT 1 '�° 57.70 TOTAL ACRE School 81JOTThence through the following eight (8) courses along said right-of-way; RANCH 55.99 ASSESSABLE`1ERE3 13.00=AL ACRES „ Joan Lewis sox (1) Thence South 89'57'00" West a distance of 73.03 feet; J60 R4NCH CORP Ss.m TmAL41.29 TOTAL ACw 60'R/W Certificate Of suns Iza4ACRU rmEMcDonald Land Co. Limited (2) Thence Suultl 7:i54'49" Wesl 0 distance of 41.23 feet; y Partnership 50x"P^ 1985 51.19 TOT&ACRES (3) Thence South 89'S7'00" West a distance of 19.74 feet; "N" 60'R/W Montano Power Co. mall ACR!"ABLE ACRES "G" 5.62 TOTAL ACRES M" certificate or (4) Thence South 89'51'08" West a distance of 1500.38 feet; No1•o2'11'E s.o9 ASSESSABLE ACRES survey5 Thence North 76'06'44" West a distance of 41.23 feet; fLOOS B ( )9'43 W arcs/A-1 (6) Thence South 89'51'08" West a distance of 459.86 feet; u" 69.96 Valley West L.L. . 7.A1 TOTAL ACRES (7) Thence South 75'54'38" West a distance of 41.10 feet; 7.55 ASSESS"&`AGE (8) Thence South 89*26'15" West a distance of 1823.64 feet; Of Lao' R/W Thence leavingsaid North right-of-way of Highway 191, North 00'40'15" East Certificate 5BSurvey so' a distance of 2557.04 feet;9 y 9 y - Certificate Of Survey a /loose TRACT 5 Thence North 01'02'11" East a distance of 1340.70 feet; c TRACT 4 Volley west L.L.C. VALLEY WEST L.LC. M17 TmKACRES 1 Thence South 89'19'43" West a distance of 669.96 feet; Z - Q 45 TOTAL ACRES MA7 ASSESSABLE ACRES 3BB1 ASS"BLEA Thence North 01'02'11" East a distance of 289.84 feet; "L"^D^ 90'R/W Thence North 2435'59" East a distance of 437.25 feet; r 45' Thence North 01'02'11" East a distance of 659.22 feet, to said North line of Section 9; ii r 2 Thence along said North line of Section 9, North 89'47'04" East a distance of 1396.88 feet, to the True Point o n of Beginning. Ox ford Trust 50x In Delaney& CO. Inc. SOx Said Tract contains 701 acres, more or less, alongwith and subject to existing easements, rights-of-way A Portion of NE 1/9, IO.55 Tarr ACES 1 9 9 Y SEI/4, Section 9, 17.77 ASSESSABLE ACES and park dedication. Certificate Of Survey f 1005 Certificate Of survey 11872 Norton Ranch Inc. tract B as Q.ez TOTAL ACACRES Michael W. Delaney SA ASS � "K" lleana lndreland 96.98 TOTAL ACRES 94.36 ASSESSABLE ACES J.C. Billion "H" Lot 3 "T" Auto Plaza o Subdivision 0'°I°C•' V. NOTE: b L-i �mv„ ^�" certificate or survey LETTERS ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES PROVIDE CORRELATION A Portion Sectioon194, SE)/4, i 1.. I Michael Delaney 2 BETWEEN THIS BOUNDARY EXHIBIT AND THE APPLICABLE Michael W. Delaney& Certircate of survey 11005 L,o7r ao lleona lndreland ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET. Paradigm Properties "F" 19-M T &ACRES 17.53 TOTAL ACRES LOT 3 19.70 aeacAB ACRES r 1.53 ASSESSABLE A� 0.97- THIS IS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PROPERTY Certificate of Survey BOUNDARIES COMPILED OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM "A" "E C 5«.. 81846 Tract I EXISTING PLATS AND CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY ON FILE AT A LOT I "G" R&D Holding CO. THE INFORMATION 19.e5 TOTAL ACRES THE GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. E' S Or m 755 1 s.61 ASSESSABLE ACES DOES NOT REPRESENT A LEGAL SURVEY OF THESE se 26'1 12 se9sroe'W L1 .1 BOUNDARIES OR PROPERTIES. .41' 1500.38' L11 g e s IMORRISON 9a w 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAIERLE,mc. x x x x � .n�. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA CRAPEBc SCALE 2885.004 GALLATIN COUNTY, MON TANA 7m q ,25)m m6 ,9oe ^ PROJECT No: (a ET1T 1 '"` FIELD WORK DATE:11/16/00 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/19/2003 E IvtS-e99 EL DRAWN BY: CM SCALE:1'=50' DRAWING NAME:K:\xaes\oo4\ArsB\IXI98n\......ap (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) CHECKED BY-CJS CLIENT: SHEET 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT B — VALLEY WEST PAYBACK BOUNDARY FOR SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Valley West Payback Boundary for Sewer Improvements LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH The Legal Description of the Volley West Payback Boundary for Sewer Improvements is as L2 sB9'48'55'w IB2.22 follows: L3 N01'10'09'E 649.24' L4 S89'48'S5"W 145.01' A tract of land located in portions of Sections 3, 4 and 10, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, LS NOI*0'08*E 08.00' P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Montano, being more articular) described as follows: L6 N01'O6'OS•E 4oe.00' Y 9 particularly � L7 NBT59.25-W 600.00' N8748.40'E L8 SOI.06'08'W 408.00' 917.41' Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 4, also being the northwest corner of said L15 No000'35 E 330.00' Lz Section 10, and True Point of Beginning; L16 NOO1oO'oo*WE364.00' S Thence along the South line of said Section 4, South 89'47'04" West a distance of 420.00 feet; L17 S01'03'48W67.11'L18 SOI.OS'Sa'W01.55' - Thence leaving said South line of Section 4, North 00'00'35" East a distance of 330.00 feet; L19 N89'48'35•E30.00' N9O0F7,00' Thence South 89'59'25" East a distance of 1328.86 feet; zn7.°° "FF" Thence North 01'34'12" East a distance of 1412.66 feet; E1/2,SE1/4,Section 4, Certificate Of sarvay fa„Certif,4vte Or Sarvey/1155 N9O '00"E /2007 Thence North 90'00'00" East a distance of 797.84 feet; ca,fircola Of Sarvy 79.84' S.#EE JJoenerfM sw�;o Thence North 00'00'00" West a distance of 364.00 feet; /1302 z4,moi°ram Peggy H Metrnfl LOT 5 BLOCK 1 v.11 rszarmc°om Thence North 90'00'00" East a distance of 2297.00 feet; Wl/$ SWJ/4 Section J DIAMOND ESTATES G - wPAYBACK ACM IN:Ru Thence North 01'00'24" East a distance of 532.54 feet, to the a,e Certifcate Or Survey SUBDIVISION /IJ02 ,,, DOUGfA9 UWCE SAl1Ma' o East—West mid—section line of said Section 3; �,raw wasCeNrcate Of Survey Mrs. Enc Anderson iry ,4 w m p« � - = /SOr Thence along said East-West mid-section line of Section 3, North 89'48'40" East t 2B sfer L Mengel Trutee a distance of 917.41 feet; E1/2. wj2. and DG^ Thence leaving said East-West mid-section line of Section 3, South 00'03'14" East a PWI/z, WI/2, SEI/4. distance of 647.59 feet; SERVICE AREA Section J lss Minor ertificte Of SurveySUSDMSION SbdHsion/25J /50 — Thence South O1'03'48" West a distance of 267.11 feet; BOUNDARY 1253 S89'S9'25E cnf,.King certircore a survey rrroctu Thence South O1'OS'S0" West o distance of 401.55 feet; Churc /IJ02 nanIrmvocable T st Do la,Lance Smifn 4Thence South 01'S9'03" East a distance of 731.02 Feet; 90'R/W ,00 � m.,r mrK _ am nars.mc Avas 4s' ' '` Thence North 89'48'35" East a distance of 30.00 feet; 9'47.04 089'59'25 9'59'25^N— N89'S9'421q DURSTON RD. 420.00'v Z. 621.40 rfir 38.56' 164J.82' N N89'S9'14�1q Thence South 01'34'00" West a distance of 594.09 feet, to the North line of Section 10; Of Sa29 3es.13 Thence alongsaid North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West a distance of 386.13 feet; Cerlircot°Of serve certircam of sa y y^/1B2B /lo05c /1005C : TRACT B a, Land Dacamented on Spacial Plat. Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, North 01'10'09" East a distance of 443.96 feet; Certificate Of Survey TRACT Z1 TRACT JA Hertiloge m S£1/+,Seclion J /1005B BURNT LEATHER VALLEY WEST LL.C. "°� Chrislion Certificate Of Surrey Thence North 01'10'09" East a distance of 1521.75 feet; TRACT I ° m''LL,am /1302 RANCH INC. ,JAY usEssaz KIIE9 8 m scbaal Thence South 89'48'55" West a distance of 147.31 feet; J60 RANCH CORP zxm M.ram i �zsz Jeon Lewis 50[ "'9 0 'Om "N" 60'R/W Certirofe Ol Survey McDonald Land Co. Umiled Thence North 01'10'09" East a distance of 649.24 feet; 588'JO'241Y Port—hip 5Ox "p" "P" 60'R/W Montano Po er Co. 919•07 ,,.';10, A,�, Thence South 89'48'55" West a distance of 182.22 feet; v.m roU�.am M. Certircate Of Thence South 01'07'29" West a distance of 2169.86 feet; Soosye Thence South 01'07'29" West a distance of 443.95 feet, to said North line of said Section 10; —" rcel 1 L Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West a distance of 1643.82 feet, - v n y we,f LL. 9 to the North 1/4 corner of said Section 10; certificate Of Servo too'R/W Thence continuing along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'25" West Certir a y re Of Sury /I005B y 50 a distance of 738.56 feet; /10056 TRACT 5 Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, South 00'10'31" East a distance of 881.78 feet; TRACT 4 Valley West L.L.C. vALL > Er wtsr L.L.C. Thence South 88'30'24" West a distance of 639.07 feet; m.•s mru.•osS 1za rsgssvaz ram Thence North 00'09'34" East a distance of 898.54 feet; 9045 Thence North 89'59'25" West a distance of 621.40 feet; Thence South 01'06'08" West a distance of 408.00 feet; Thence North 89'59'25" West a distance of 600.00 feet; O=fold Trust SOX Thence North 01'06'08' East a distance of 408.00 feet, to said North line of Section 10; Delaney&CO.Inc. SOx Thence alongsaid North line of Section 10, North 89'59'25" West a distance of 45.01 feet, A Portion a NE I/4, r.p.0 sE1/4, Section 9, to the True Point of Beginning. Certil'cofe Of Surrey Norto 11005 Mc. "K" Cerfircate Of Survey/1872 2RnKcm Troct 8 Said Tract contains 211 acres, more or less, along with and subject to existing easements, Michael W.Delcnoy rights-of-way and park dedication. "R" Ileono Indmland ve.vv nau urno wN^ vx wvms.az� J.C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision eca Certificate Of survey A Portion of SEi/4,SE1/4, J. /IB46 Trocf 2 Section 9 un s Michael W. Delaney& Certirrcnta o/Survey/1005 „v. ft—Indmland Pomdigm Properties "f vae rnK.am NOTE: ,.'y m,K�Qi4 UR 2 rY.2i IA63dB1E yam LETTERS ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES PROVIDE CORRELATION ^A^ ",,,�., certireaee Of sarvey BETWEEN THIS BOUNDARY EXHIBIT AND THE APPLICABLE /16+6 Trocf 1 ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET. •:m-1. G� R&D Holding CO. ,v.m nnr4,aas '1i'e`r.. : ae ,,.er wiz vam THIS IS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PROPERTY BOUNDARIES COMPILED OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM EXISTING PLATS AND CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY ON FILE AT THE GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE INFORMATION DOES NOT REPRESENT A LEGAL SURVEY OF THESE BOUNDARIES OR PROPERTIES. MORRISON 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAIERLE,►NC. La„•, x x x x � a... rv�nem - r PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA mc scut CR4e PROJECT NO:2885,004 �n CALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA so 12s w m o00 FIELD WORK DATE:11/16/00 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/19/2003 DRAWN BY: CID SCALE:i-=500' DRAWING NAME:N:\2w5\oo4VL'Ao\aMgffiT\w"w.a"q (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) CHECKED BY GJs CLIENT: SHEET 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT A - VALLEY WEST SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS Valley West Water Service Area Boundary The Legal Description of the Valley West Service Area Boundary is as follows: A Tract of Land located in portions of Sections 3, 9 and 10, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, r Montana, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 9, also being the northwest corner of said Section 10, and True Point of Beginning; LINE TABLE UNE 8EARINc LENGTH Thence along the West line of said Section 3, North 00'47'00"E a distance of 1320.00 feet; Is 589.51' z .ae' L6 N76'O6'44 Thence leaving said West line of Section 3, S89'59'25" East a distance of 3443.58 feet; 441W 41 41.23' 9 L7 sair51'081Y 459.86' Thence South 00'47'00" West a distance of 1319.93 feet, to the North line of said Section 10; L8 S75'54'38'W 41.10' Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West a distance of 174.95 feet; L9 N89'S9421Y 17a.9s Thence leaving said North line of Section 10. South 00'28'03" West a distance of 1320.00 feet; Thence North 89'59'42" West a distance of 630.01 feet, to the North-South mid-section line of said Section 10; Thence along said North-South mid-section line of Section 10, South 00'28'03" West o distance of 2573.90 feet; W1/2, SWI/4 Section J Thence North 90'00'00" West a distance of 1355.39 feet; Certificate Or Survey 589'S9'25�E 589'S9'25'E B IJ02 2638.62' 804.96' Thence South 00'00'00" West a distance of 1328.63 feet, to the North right-of-way of Highway 191; Mrs. Eric Anderson Thence through the following five (5) courses along said North right-of-way; 3e.v1BAAAL�"� "C0" (1) Thence South 89'51'08" West a distance of 288.48 feet; "E18" (2) Thence North 76'06'44" West a distance of 41.23 feet; 0 o fi/2, W1/2, and (3) Thence South 89'51'08" West a distance of 459.86 feet; a WI/2, w1/2, SE114, Minor Section J less Minor (4) Thence South 75'54'38" West a distance of 41.10 feet; o^ SUBDIVISION Subdivision 8253 0 (5) Thence South 89'26'15" West a distance of 1823.64 feet; z ^ t the25J 9 Certificate Of Thence leaving said North right-of-woy of Highway 191, North 00'40'15" East a distance of 2557.04 feet; P.O.B. Christ the Kin Lutheran Churc Douglas Lancesmith "OD" Thence North 01'02'11" East a distance of 1340.70 feet; 9.97 TOTAL ACRES ♦9.53 TOTAL ACRES 90'R/W "X" 7.ea ASSESSABLE ACRES 47.72 ASSESSABLE ACRES Thence South 89'19'43" West a distance of 669.96 feet; 45' 89'4T04'EA L9 3 OURSTON RD. 816.aw ° rtu'c , Thence North 01*02'11" East a distance of 289.84 feet; Z. Of survey Thence North 24'35'59" East a distance of 437.25 feet; certifiate of sarve W certificate or survey "Y" 11121 11005C 81005C TRACT B Thence North 01'02'11" East a distance of 659.22 feet; to the North line of said Section 9; - Certificate Of survey TRACT ZA ^rs TRACT JA HertitageL SEI/4, Section 3 Thence along said North line of Section 9, North 89'47'04" East a distance of 1816.88 feet, to the True Point of Land Documented on special Plat, ®1005B BURNT LEATHER �'n VALLEY WEST L.L.C. Christian _ Certificate Of Survey 57.7o TOTAL ACRES Beginning. TRACT 1 RANCH INC. z o ss.99 ASSESSABLE ACRES School c$ 11302 J60'RANCH CORP 23.W TOTAL ACRES 13•00 TOTAL ACRES m o Jean Lewis 50% "'29 TOTAL ACRES m 60'R W 12"A b McDonald Land Co. Limited Containing 577 acres, more or less, along with and subject to existing easements, rights-of-way and park dedication. �yry / certificatte OT Survey o Partnership SOX Ln . ^P" ,.,^. r99B5 4.5s TOTAL ACRES o-^7 "N" 60'R/W Montana Power Co. 4.w ASSESSBLE ACRES "o" 5.a2 TOTAL ACRES "M" Certificate Or NOf02'11'E S.ao ASSESSABLE ACRES Survey 289.84' 1 '41005 B 589'19'43W Parcel A-1 N89S9'421Y erfificate Of 669.96 Valley West L.L. 630.01' 7A1 TOTAL ACRES `'rvey 735 ASSESSABLE ACRE 1_1610 TRACT A Certificate Of surve 100 R/W THE VECTOR Certificate Of Survey 1005E y 50 GROUP L.L.C. d 37.7E TOTAL ACRES ,W c 7005B TRACT 5 ,"GG" m9a AsscssAelE ACRES TRACT 4 Volley West C.L.C. 19.09 ACRES IN SOMCE a VALLEY WEST 1.1.17. AREA PAYBACK BDONDARY 136.1] ­5 TOTAL ACRES TOTAL - 12 39.61 ASSESSABLE ACRES 5.47 ASSESSABLE ACRES . z 90'R/W 45' T NA Oxford must 50X Delaney&CO. Inc. 50% A Portion of N£ 1/4, "LI" N35 TOTAL ACRES 5'EI/4, Section 9, 17.TA ASSESSABLE ACRES Certificate Or Survey 11005 Certificate Of survey 11672 Norton Ronch Inc. Tract B 8.82 TOTAL ACRES "T" Michael W. Delaney ASSE§pRql ACRES "K" Ileano Indreland u, 96.A TOTAL ACRES WITHIN ASSESSABLE APAYB " 55.85 AILS AiT1aN SEfMCE AREA PAYBACK BOUNDARY Billion " c H Auto Plaza W2 2 11 Aa N9a00'00'W z Subdivision a.s2«.. "y" 1355.39' . o,'go1T�, Certificate Of Survey A Portion of SE1/4, SE1/4, I "J" Certificate Tract r - Section 9 Michael W. Delaney& - NOTE: certificate of survey 11005 LOT as Ileano Indreland LETTERS ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES PROVIDE CORRELATION Paradigm Properties "F" XI TOTAL BLE A BETWEEN THIS BOUNDARY EXHIBIT AND THE APPLICABLE 17.M TOTAL ACRES LOT 2 ,� 19.23 ASSESSABLE ACRES n.s3 AssssAeLE ACiiES 0.97« o,d ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET. o N o^' Certificate Of Survey "A" eLe«, o 3 n. /1646 Tract I THIS IS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PROPERTY 4.LO«.. 'G" R&D Holding CO. BOUNDARIES COMPILED OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM 19.0 TOTAL ACRES Cat 4 2 15.61 ASSESSABLE ACRES EXISTING PLATS AND CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY ON FILE AT $69.26'15vw ,E �• THE GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE INFORMATION 1823.64' 1 L8 I L7 L6 L5 DOES NOT REPRESENT A LEGAL SURVEY OF THESE 5 BOUNDARIES OR PROPERTIES. IMORRISON 9 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAIERLE,INC. E x x x . re^n>,m PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA cRALnOc sceTa 2q° q Ia 2qa sqo loon ' PROJECT N0:2885.004 GALLATIN COUNTY,MON TANA �T I«h"600 n) O FlEID WORK DATE:11/16/00 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/19/2003 (PRIOR TO RE R EDUCTION) DRAWN BY: cm SCALE:1"=500' DRAWING NAME:N:\2S95\OO4VcAO\Ex O8rr\wATERA"q CHECKED BY�WS CLIENT: SHEET 1 OF 1 EXHIBIT B — VALLEY WEST PAYBACK BOUNDARY FOR WATER IMPROVEMENTS Valley West Payback Boundary for Water Improvements The Legal Description of the Valley West Payback Boundary for Water Improvements is as follows: LINE TABLE A Tract of Land located in portions of Sections 3 and 10, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City LINE BEARING LENGTH of Bozeman, Montana, being more particularly described as follows: L1 NB9'59'25 W 45.01' Ls No1'06'08•E 600.00' Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 3, also being the northwest corner of said Section W N89'S9'251Y 600.00' 9 9 L41 SOI.06'08 W 408.00' 10, and True Point of Beginning; 1-9 N89'59'42'1q 174.95' Thence along the West line of said Section 3, North 00'47'00" East a distance of 1320.00 feet; Thence leaving said West line of Section 3, South 89'59'25" East a distance of 2638.62 feet; W1/2, SWI/4 Section J Thence South 89'59'25" East a distance of 804.96 feet; Certificate Of Survey S89'59'25"E S89'59'25"E Thence South 00'47'00" West a distance of 1319.93 feet, to the North line of said Section 10; 11302 2638.62' e04.96' Mrs. £nc An Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West a distance of 174.95 feet; ;i9TOBUE "Gc" Thence continuing along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'42" West a distance of 630.01 feet, to ACRES the North 1/4 corner of said Section 10; fi/2, WI/2, and Thence continuing along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'25" West a distance of 738.56 feet;'oo o W1/2, W1/2, SE1/4, 8 m Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, South 00'10'31" East a distance of 881.78 feet; b n Section J less Minor SUBOMSION Subdivision 825J $" Thence South 88'30'24" West a distance of 639.07 feet; 8253 Certificate Of survey Thence North 00'09'34" East a distance of 898.54 feet, to said North line of Section 10; P.09. cnrist the King 81302 ThJence long said North line of Section 10, South 89'59'25" West a distance of 621.40 feet; Lutheran Chum Douglas Lance Smith Thence 9 90'R 9.9,T.ACRE 49M TOr&ACRE /w LI ^X^ ,,8, , 41,E5 Thence leaving said North line of Section 10, South 01'06'08" West a distance of 408.00 feet; "1n4 45' 89'59'25 89'S9'5�q—ASSE�ACRES L9 Thence North 89'59'25" West a distance of 600.00 feet; DURSTON RD. 9 621.4o rtific 38.5 630.01 Thence North 01'06'08" East a distance of 408.00 feet, to said North line of Section 10;; Certificate Of Serve Certircule Of Survey Z. Y°1182yy Thence along said North line of Section 10, North 89'59'25" West a distance of 45.01 feet, to the True, 81005C 81005C TRACT B m Land Documented on Special Plat, Point.of Beginning. Certificate O/Survey TRACT 24 TRACT 3'A ^�n Hertitoge °o S£1/4, Section J 81005E BURM LEATHER VALLEY WEST L.L.C. L3 o m Christian m Certificate O/Survey TRACT 1 S,.,O Tao ACRES a 81J02 Containing 122 acres, more or less, along with and subject to existing easements, rights—of—way and park RANCH INC. 53.99 ASSESSABLE ACRES o School J60 RANCH CORP 23.60 TOT&ACRE 13.a0 ior&ACES Jean Lewis 50% ♦1.99 TOT&ACRE 19.34 ASSES ygE dedication. 60'R/W Certilicofe OT Survey ACRES McDonald Land Co. Limited ^P" S88'30'24"W Partnership 50R "N" 60' R/W Montano Power Co. 639.07' 4.39 iCRESS4AssESSI&BLE� 5.62 TOT&ACRES M. Certificate Of '.OD ASSESSABLE ACRES Survey - 81005 B A.Am arcel A-t erti/icote O/ Voi iy TOOYAL DES Survey 7.35 ASSESSABLE AM 81610 TRACT A Certificate 0I Survey 100'R/W THE VECTOR 50' CROUP L.L.C. Certificate 07 Survey 81005E 81005E 3,.,8 TOTAL ACRES TRACT 4 Volley West L.L.C. `"GG" L9,09 AARCCRES IN ASSESSABLE ACRES BOUNDARY VALLEY OY&A L.L.C. 138.1,TOM ACRES 40.45 TaTAL ACRES 1,.5.4,ASSESSABLE ACES ]6.61 ASSESSABLE ACRES "L" 90'R/W 45' ne Oxford Trust 50R Delaney& CO. Inc. 50R A Portion o/NE 1/4, "Ua 20.3s TOTAL ACRES 17.77 ASSEssA8E ACRE SEI/4, Section 9, Certificate Of Survey 81005 Certificate Of Survey 81872 Norton Ranch Inc. Troct B �Q.ez TOTAL ACRES Michael W. Delaney "K" "T" Ileano Indrelond 96.66 TOT&ACRES 54.94 ASSESSABLE ACRES J.C. Billion "H" 55.85 ACRES MRIN94 S.I.D.BOUNDARY LOT 3 Auto Plaza z 1.35 ace Subdivision 0.°i°C1' V. y°Qo', Certificate Of Survey A Portion a/Sf1/4, SEi/4, I 87846 1-1 2 Section 9 LOT 3 Michael & Certificate o/Survey 81005 aAa. lleano Indrelond Paradigm Properties "F" ISM—AL ACRES 17.5]TOTAL ACRE LOT 9 t9.93 ASSESSABLE ACRES 17.5)ASSESSABLE ACRES 0.97aa „ ^ B�J Certificate 0/Survey A Lor 1 o'4 81846 Tract 1 4.86 ace. "G" R&D Holding CO. 19.e3 TOT&ACRE E 3.11 4 9 55 s.61 ASSESSAB E ACRES NOTE: LETTERS ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES PROVIDE CORRELATION BETWEEN THIS BOUNDARY EXHIBIT AND THE APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET. THIS IS A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PROPERTY BOUNDARIES COMPILED OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM EXISTING PLATS AND CERTIFICATES OF SURVEY ON FILE AT THE GALLATIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE INFORMATION DOES NOT REPRESENT A LEGAL SURVEY OF THESE BOUNDARIES OR PROPERTIES. MORRISON �.a 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAI� ERLE,INC. x x x PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA cRARwc BCALa PROJECT No:2885.004 w." eoanA S,ALLATItJ COUNTY, MONTANA po q Its Aso Am 1000 FlELD WORK• DATE:11/16/00 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/19/2003 l T LLaae-ea RAWN" D BY: CTD SCALE:1 =500 DRAIWNC NAME:N:\zee5\OO.VCAO\EX.Ien\-TER—, (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) CHECKED Bri GJ5 CLIENT: SHEET I OF I 1 I '1" RECEIVED FES 0 3 Z003 I ' AABERG CULTURAL REsOURCE� Ci ONSULTING SERVICE 2909 East MacDonald Drive Billings,Montana 59102 phone/fax (406)655-3540 VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 1, ADDENDUM TO CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY RESULTS, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 1 I by Stephen A. Aaberg, Chris Crofutt and Jayme Green 1 prepared by: Aaberg Cultural Resource Consulting Service 2909 East MacDonald Drive Billings, Montana 59102 1 report prepared for: Morrison-Maierle,Incorporated Bozeman, Montana 1 January 2003 1 1 1 Montana Cultural Resource Annotated Bibliography System DATA ENTRY FORM ' DOCUMENT GA REPORT NUMBER: DATE: 01 30 1 03 County File Report No. 1 Code Code SHPO use on AUTHOR(Last,First,Middle Initial,et al) Aaberg, Stephen A., Chris Crofutt, and ' Jayme Green TITLE: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1,Addendum to Class III Cultural Resource Inventory Results, Gallatin County,Montana ' AGENCY: OTHER AGENCIES: OTHER COUNTIES: (1) (2) AGENCY DOCUMENT/PROJECT NO: SURVEY ACRES: 240 DOCUMENT TYPE: 1. Inventory/Evaluation 2. Overview . 3. Mitigation/Excavation 4. Other KEYWORDS: (SHPO use only) (1) (2) .(3) 4 5) 6 7 1 INVENTORY LOCATION PROPERTIES/ T R S SITE NUMBER PROPERTY/SITE NAME ' 2S 5E 9 24GA1588 2S 5E 10 ' Attach to inventory report and send to: State Historic Preservation Office Montana P Historical Society, 1410 8`h Avenue,PO Box 201202,Helena,MT 59620-1202 1 1 ' VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 1, ADDENDUM TO CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY RESULTS ' GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA ' by ' Stephen A.Aaberg, Chris Crofutt . and Jayme Green ' Aaberg Cultural Resource Consulting Service 2909 East MacDonald Drive Billings,Montana 59102 January 2003 Contract Report to Morrison-Maierle, Incorporated Bozeman,Montana r ABSTRACT ' Morrison-Maierle, Incorporated, of Bozeman, Montana, are the consulting engineers for Phase 1 of the Valley West Subdivision. The project is being undertaken by Valley West, L.L.C., of Calistoga, California, on lands they own just inside the west boundary of the city of Bozeman, and ' Bozeman Lakes L.L.C. of Phoenix, Arizona. As apart of the subdivision, developers plan to build residential and commercial areas, roads and alleys, sidewalks,parks, install utility services(power, sewer, water), drainage ditches, and preserve wetlands areas around Baxter Creek and the ' Maynard-Border Ditch. As required by the Gallatin County Commission, a cultural resource consultation was requested. Morrison-Maierle Incorporated (MAH) contracted with Aaberg Cultural Resource Consulting Service (ACRCS) of Billings, Montana, to conduct the necessary cultural investigations. A Class III cultural resource survey of the entire 240 acre Valley West Subdivision Phase I project area was carried out by ACRCS on September 17-19, 2002. Prehistoric cultural remains of any sort were not found during the survey. A portion of the Phase I property was inspected during ' an earlier survey in April of 2002 and cultural resources were not found. This report is an addendum to the earlier report and details findings of cultural reource investigations of all of the remaining portion of the Valley West Phase I project area. ' A previously unrecorded historic site (24GA1588)was discovered during the September of 2002 survey of a 240 acre portion of the planned subdivision. The site consists of a small shed that ' may have been moved to its current location. Also present at the site is a corral with several small pens and a loading chute. Both of these structures are unkept and in deteriorating condition. This historic site is recommended as ineligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 1 1 ' 1 r ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................i LISTOF FIGURES.................................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................1 ' Project Background.........................................................................................................1 Scopeof Work..................................................................................................................1 Description of Valley West Subdivision Phase 1...........................................................I 1 LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIONS..............................................................7 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND NATURAL HISTORY..............................................9 LocalGeography..............................................................................................................9 PhysiographicProfile.....................................................................................................11 Vegetation..................»...................................................................................................11 ' Fauna...............................................................................................................................11 Climate............................................................................................................................12 Geology............................................................................................................................12 ' CULTURAL SETTING............................................................................................................14 Prehistory........................................................................................................................14 Protohistoryand History..........................................................:....................................14 FIELD METHODS,RESULTS,AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................11 FieldMethods.................................................................................................................17 SurveyResults................................................................................................................17 ' Resource Descriptions ...................................................................................................18 Site24GA1 S88......................................................................................................................18 Description........................................................................................................................18 National Register Status and Recommendations........................::::.............................19 SUM1gARY............................................................................ 20 REFERENCESCITED.............................................................................................................21 ' APPENDIX A:............................................................................................................................23 LIST OF FIGURES ' Figure 1: Locator map showing Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 project area in Gallatin County,Montana...................................................................................................................3 ' Figure 2: Bozeman Quadrangle,Gallatin County-Montana,USGS 7.5' Topographic with the proposed Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 survey boundary....................................4 Figure 3: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Preliminary Plan with Structure Locations....5 Figure 4: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Land Use with Structure Locations.................6 Figure 5: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Project Area and Site Boundary.....................10 ii INTRODUCTION ' Project Background. Morrison-Maierle,Incorporated,(MMD of Bozeman,Montana,are the consulting engineers ' for the proposed Valley West Subdivision. The project is being undertaken by Valley West L.L.C.of Calistoga, California,the owners of the property,and Bozeman Lakes L.L.C. of Phoenix,Arizona, on lands located on the west edge of the city of Bozeman. As a part of the subdivision,the owners ' intend to develop a portion(309 acres)of the property designated as Phase 1.(Figures 2-5). Phase 1 plans utilize approximately 75 acres for residential dwellings and include proposed streets and alleys,soccer fields and parks,and various utilities(water,sewer,power). A 69-acre parcel of Phase ' 1 was inspected previously(Aaberg 2002) and 240 acres were surveyed in the fall of 2002. In 2002 MMI contracted with Aaberg Cultural Resource Consulting Service (ACRCS) to ' carry out the Class III cultural resource inventory of the remaining 240 acres of Phase I. The contract charged ACRCS with conducting a Class III cultural resource survey to identify any prehistoric and ' historic sites that may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places(NRHP)in areas where any form of development is planned. ' Scope of Work Because construction the proposed subdivision could potentially disturb cultural sites, ' ACRCS was requested to identify and record any prehistoric and historic properties within the planned boundaries of the Valley West Subdivision. ACRCS field supervisor Chris Crofutt along with field technician Jayme Green,conducted an archaeological survey of 240 acres of Phase 1 in the ' Valley West Subdivision between September 17 and 19, 2002. A 69-acre portion of Phase I was previously investigated by Aaberg(2002) in April of 2002. The primary objective of the Class III inventory was to locate and record any cultural resources, prehistoric or historic, within Phase 1 of the Valley West Subdivision. The secondary objective was to determine National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility for any sites . ' found inside the survey boundary. Determinations of significance or NRHP eligibility of prehistoric sites are generally accomplished by interpreting results of test excavation and through analysis of surficial site attributes. Historic site evaluation is accomplished mainly by researching primary and ' secondary documents,and/or oral history,and analysis of architectural attributes of standing historic structures. This report details the methods used in the survey, describes the results, and provides an environmental and cultural setting as a context for understanding the archaeology and history. ' Description of Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 1 The property is divided into three main blocks with further division into ten tracts and one park (Figure 3). Block 1 is the southern half of Phase 1 and occurs between north-south running Cottonwood Road and Ferguson Road. East-west running ning Cascade Street and West Babcock Street 1 form the north and south borders of this block. Block 1 consists of three tracts,two residential and one smaller commercial tract located in the southwest comer of Block 1 in Tract 2. This block also ' contains the 69 acres that were previously surveyed. Block 2 is the northern half of Phase 1,also between Cottonwood Road and Ferguson Road. ' Cascade Street follows the southern border and Durston Road follows the northern border of the block. Block 2 is broken up into four residential tracts. Heritage Christian School lies between Tracts 1 and 4,and a small area of private land lies in the northwest corner of Tract 4. The Maynard- Border Ditch flows through the middle of Blocks 1 and 2. A 100'corridor along the length of the ditch is reserved as a parks area. ' To the west of Cottonwood Road is Block 3. This block is divided into three tracts, two residential and one smaller commercial tract in the southeast comer. To the north and west of Block 3 is land set aside for Bronken Park. This park will contain several soccer fields and some ponds. Baxter Creek cuts through the southwest corner of Block 3,running north outside the survey area, then through the southwest corner of Bronken Park.Along the northern section of Baxter Creek are ' also marsh lands.Planned even farther west of Bronken Park are more residential areas,with a large man-made pond(Figure 4). ' Outside the survey area to the east are the Ferguson Meadows and Valley Unit Subdivisions. Just off of the southeast corner is another area of Valley Unit Subdivisions and the Crescent Valley Condominiums. To the south and west of the survey area are undeveloped and/or farm lands. The project is planned for construction over an 8—10 year period,with approximately 1300 residential units to be constructed on the property. ' 2 1 ' G Ir 1 IDLE LILAC LN AL OANIE_S SHERIOAN PARK a I e 1 -t BLAINE PHILLIPS VA_LE,Y - ~°'bINgN4 SERVA OhI c� l ls(1C L I I E •2 O g U C U I R.. ATION '•#A. 2�iJ I FOFIT B _ P �4 i. �IaS Rfver II.AtAN R VATM.*.1 fi AICHt AND it Fan Peck R D C R R E 3 W"j7 4'j Ficer Rese — Sao® _ Mt+ �� H' ` cOHE DAw50H ry IAN c A L - 4 �• RV �, FR DHE � liAgFtELD F ^9 C-F LA GLIOV �, M1.T:71V1'T11.1.H ' ! IIs30 Rs FAA c 1 % AIg1E P �F 'C nOaCCVC •A�ORANf1E O EL �� G �A117 ...TELL 9 -1 � I�Cb �qq F0.LlOH CT { S 1 OEENIIIDr'E # Aldtl• i - i1H[FX ^ 2 SILVER BOW RA A , `1 De +BASS Arm ♦...... m fl L . �' +8 fix � R�� � •'• d� 'DUW RE VAT BE !ERNE 91 89 •ae C rftDIANC SOW ER CARiE 'POEM PAN ' BO K ut_ » .AT AIEA i ' Project Area Figure 1: Locator map showing Valley West,Subdivision Phase 1 project area in Gallatin ' County,Montana. (map adapted from DeLorme Mapping 1994 Montana Atlas & Gazetter) 1 1 1 '•sa - '�>'.: _onr>/f I ��% it r5;:fr+:�,ll: cam.' .t- r._,! /�:-�-. ,-ij A ' t -'g^v) `! .. ����� r• � � ��ir,�+•"f'"J�lr- ��//sue �_�,�1�r��r � ���t �� l� i ,•! _�-. r L!� -esu~�] z.. � �fl y� �j� �.�����c/f/���i ��r--��M �, a,o ,av •�C'j K• �.. ace•- . ,,:i:r _ V, _i! •-'��_ S� �r�t_ j/<_ c`e-,' i I ��} ''' Y t 1 '1i.i:• 1' ♦4r ,�� � .�r/rim(/ L,,e•71J/ �, r1• �i/ S� ' �i,� `�'` T*\ _ .:t \. "!--- f- � -�i '••f �� -..oaf i S� �J��.,�/ S!�[y. � - i A L �'`',�.i-��t't: \ .'..r>-`�•�. `-_.. •� _. �t�- r'�r:ram �?_'�,.� t�rr�('L•'}.� r1 -�'^ � 'I�it: � �` .-'r r-•`'hi ` � r>=� ��� '�/r'f'1Z7;Z.�-�<� '-•\Z, �1>1/\ / �11t '_y`/ _ { __ I'• -� � t• i`i" ;''+"/.�. y!'•�-���`�,�T K'�ctJ. l�tl ): \ �I`,� _t.°�K�y M �� I yJ��/� � `' k:� ��T,�•I � \, i��"f'.���t1 •" '�L I �` �,\ -�'� ? ��:'•1�� ycrl �1 c's [' 'mil' �`}• �, {' - ,`' - .\\ j - 'iy^�tv.� •: ,�• _ �f'"t�e• 3r ~ tw:,a��t;.-. Ihs;:.._. i� -•\ •. 5 1' >:r ' S11n'ey �f,- ,>rur •,�'k r'�.\,_,;��yl r;�' r- ..�. - _. ' • 1 r? - � t ary ,>rs- ,• { :.. ,42 .nrd.- j �/ - our �..l '� tr y t (• J �y°"`L�-7 r � l i�"�','�\��-•. � - v �. 44 Ot ._�:• `` +� '• ,. ,�� ' gaga 3 rr c "::� �}�\�_.. � -v \{_,ems_ I _—II -i..(�>.. !,•,� ..% a a.. l=j'%3.. :t S>'T .•�' / ' s I f�_�.aow�- I =--`� I m,ar� d,i� / Ii:;ill �'�i.��7/i���'? ' �lDr�-�/v,r _ =r• • ,�css.:. fr .c...i•- _.. - T'si- , , �, • 'r¢.,..C_. r \�'LiD\\: `- �.-,;)l:� `Figure 2: Bozeman Quadrangle, Gallatin County-Montana,USGS 7.5' Topographic with the proposed Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 survey boundary. ' 4 a A a � - Y s U' B b Y � Y m Y a l� y e Al F77 i COU Figure 3: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Preliminary Plan with Structure Locations. ' (adapted from Valley West Preliminary Plan map,MMI) ' 5 - 8+rn it ✓� I f s tl ::Cr r. s'• �� i;� ,r 1 ► � PQ as a i '44 'v ' o o 4 e e R � a = � to r w Pea + < 8 ; Figure 4: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Land Use with Structure Locations. ' (adapted from Valley West Subdivision Adjacent Land Uses,MMI) ' 6 LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIONS ' Since the proposed Valley West Phase 1 subdivision development involves land disturbing activities,the Gallatin County Commission required consideration of potential effect to any cultural resources that could occur on the property.A number of additional state and federal laws mandate ' the treatment of prehistoric and historic sites on certain lands and developments. These laws include: the Antiquity Act of 1906, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969(and subsequent amendments),Executive Order 11593 of 1971, ' the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974,the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1979,the American Indian Religious Freedom Act,the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990,the Montana Environmental Policy Act,and the Montana Human Skeletal Remains and Burial Site Protection Act of 1991. Consideration of historic,paleontological,archaeological,and cultural sites is required by tthe City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations. Cultural Resources can be broadly defined as any physical remnants of past human life and activity that occurs within the landscape. These resources are then identified and defined as"sites", ' where past human occupation occurred and past use can be documented. Any of these sites that are 50 years old or older can be considered a cultural resource. ' All cultural resources are evaluated by a set of criteria established by the National Park Service(USDI-NPS Bulletin 15)and are determined significant only if they meet one or more of the tfollowing standards: A) they are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad ' patterns of our history; and/or B) they are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; ' C) they embody distinctive characteristics of a type,period,or method of construction that represents high artistic value or the work of a master,or that possess high artistic values, ' or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; ' D) -they have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. If sites do not meet any of the above criteria of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, they are considered non-significant. With agreement of site evaluations by a ' permitting or managing agency (including county commissions) and the Montana State Historic Preservation Office(MTSHPO),the proposed action may continue without further consideration or consultation of the non-significant sites. 7 If a site or sites meet any of these criteria, a permitting or managing agency is required to determine the effect of the proposed action on the site. Upon concurrence with the MTSHPO,one of ' the following three determinations is possible: 1. No effect—the agency has determined that the undertaking will not effect the site. The project is allowed to proceed. 2. No adverse effect—the agency determines that there will be some degree of an effect,but it will not be adverse. The agency submits a report justifying this determination to the Montana SHPO and NPS which may agree or disagree to the decision. When a consensus is reached,the project is allowed to proceed. 3. Adverse effect—the agency determines that the effect on discovered, eligible cultural g Y ' resources will be adverse. When this occurs,the agency is directed to consider ways to mitigate the impacts on cultural resources. Mitigation of a significant cultural resource includes a range of options, such as project redesign and/or avoidance, documentation ' (photography and archival research), restoration and data recovery (through archaeological excavation). Which of these options is utilized is determined on a case- by-case review. ' Mitigation treatments are tailored to the distinct values of the property and the planning options available within the project design. Once all of the consulting parties agree on ' mitigation procedures for the eligible properties and the conditions or stipulations have been met,the project may proceed. 1 1 1 . t e 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND NATURAL HISTORY Local Geography The legal description for lands encompassed by the planned Valley West Subdivision-Phase ' 1 project area is as follows: NW 1/4 Section 10,E 1/2NE 1/4 Section 9,NW 1/4NE 1/4 Section 9,NE 1/4NW 1/4 Section 9; Township 2 South,Range 5 East; Gallatin County,Montana ' The Valley West Subdivision occurs on flat terrain near the west edge of the city of Bozeman.The locality is part of the Gallatin Valley and the vicinity appears to be part of the Baxter ' Creek floodplain (Figure 2) although the Gallatin Valley in this area includes alluvial sediments deposited by a variety of streams that drain northward to the East Gallatin River. Even though the ' project area was once rural in nature, the city of Bozeman and associated subdivisions have encroached on the locality and developments essentially surround the Valley West tract. Less development has occurred to the west of the tract.West Babcock Street forms the south boundary of ' Phase 1 while Ferguson Avenue runs along the east edge. Durston Road travels across the northern border of the Valley West development. Cottonwood Road cuts through the planned Valley West Subdivision running north—south and Cascade Street passes through the subdivision east—west. ' Cascade Street connects Cottonwood Road to Ferguson Road(Figure 4). The Maynard-Border Ditch(an active natural stream and ditch)flows northward through the ' center of the east half of the Phase 1 project tract,eventually discharging into Baxter Creek about 5 miles to the north-northeast of the tract. Baxter Creek, a perennial stream that flows northerly through a portion of the Valley West Subdivision,is found both inside and outside the boundaries(to ' the west) of the Phase 1 survey area. Baxter Creek eventually enters Hyalite Creek about 7 miles north-northwest of the project tract. Several miles from its confluence with Baxter Creek,Hyalite Creek flows into the East Gallatin River. The Baxter Ditch, the largest irrigation feature in the ' vicinity of the project area, flows along the west side of Cottonwood Road. A smaller irrigation ditch runs parallels the north side of Durston Road(Figure 3). ' From the vicinity of the project area,the East Gallatin River flows northwesterly through the Gallatin Valley,along the west slopes of the Bridger Range. About 20 miles northwest of Bozeman, near Manhattan, Montana,the East and West Gallatin Rivers join to form the Gallatin River. The ' Missouri River rises from the confluence of the Gallatin, Madison and Jefferson Rivers, about 30 miles northwest of the project area. On the southwestern and western horizons,across the Gallatin Valley,are the Spanish Peaks and the Madison Range,while the Gallatin Range and foothills rise not far to the south and southeast. 1 9 ............ -A if T V I V—" 1 1 _��-_ � �- r n ��J t Mb�y � } PC 1 Pic Figure 5: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Project Area and Site Boundary. (derived from USGS 7.51 Bozeman,Montana Quadrangle) 10 1 Physiographic Profile Mt. Ellis stands at the northern edge of the Gallatin Range,rising to 8,331', about 10 miles southeast of the project area while Wheeler Mountain,at about 8,800',is present about 8 miles to the south-southeast. The Hyalite Peaks rise to over I0,000'some 18 miles to the south. The project area ' rests at about 4815', within the Gallatin Valley and the tract occurs for the most part within the inactive floodplain of Baxter Creek. Baxter Creek has its source in the footslopes of the Gallatin Range to the south of the project area. Other alluvial fan and slope deposits also intrude into the edge of the Gallatin Valley from the south and are present south of the project area. Soils apparent in exposures on the Phase 1 terrace are alluvial loams. Stream and outwash gravels underlie the loam, which appears to range from 0.75cm to 1.25 meters thick. Except for wetland areas, the entire Phase 1 tract is currently being farmed or has been farmed in the past. Other previous developments have also affected the area. In addition to street ' construction,several borrow ditches and dozer cuts have been excavated in the eastern section of the Phase 1 development. These ditches and cuts appear to have been made some time ago as vegetation has begun to reclaim them. Vegetation ' Essentially all of the project tract has been cultivated and presently supports a variety of introduced pasture grasses. The non-agricultural vegetation of the project area can be divided into ' three main communities:grassland,mountain forest,and riparian. In addition to various grasses and sedges, the grassland areas support goldenrod, aster, canada thistle, and other weedy forbs. The forests on the mountain slopes to the south of the project area are dominated by Douglas fir, with ' aspen on the fringes. There is very little riparian vegetation along the man-made Maynard-Border Ditch that flows through the tract. ' Fauna Even with urban development spreading to the project area, white-tail deer are common ' sights. The Gallatin Range provides habitat for a variety of other species including elk,mule deer, moose, and black bear. Other species frequently seen in or near the project area include skunk, cottontail rabbit,raccoon,mink,weasel,snowshoe hare,fox,coyote,muskrat,beaver,and porcupine. ' Mountain lion and bobcat are present in area mountain ranges and occasionally are seen in the valley. A variety of small rodents are present as are a variety of songbirds and raptors. Historically,bison ' were present in Gallatin Valley. The Antoneson Site, a late-prehistoric bison kill site a few miles southwest of Bozeman,provides archeological evidence for bison in numbers large enough to have supplied communal hunting opportunities for the aboriginal human inhabitants of the area. ' 11 1 Climate ' Generally, the Gallatin Valley experiences cold winters with heavy snow from December through May. The east and northeast aspects of area mountain ranges see large accumulations of snow,making those areas suitable for ski developments. Western aspects receive similar quantities ' of snow, but more exposure to the sun keeps accumulations lower than other aspects. Annual precipitation at Bozeman ranges between 15 and 17 inches. The Gallatin Range receives considerably more precipitation than valley settings. ' The weather in the Gallatin Valley is influenced by three main air masses: Pacific, Arctic, and Tropical Maritime. During the winter, Pacific and Arctic weather systems determine temperature and precipitation tendencies,with Pacific systems generally being warmer and wetter. Arctic systems are generally colder and dryer. During winter months,Pacific systems can produce mild downslope winds("chinooks"),which melt snows and raise temperatures. Spring weather in ' the area is variable and unpredictable, with alternating influences from all three fronts, although Pacific systems tend to dominate. Late spring and early summer,typically the wettest months of the ' year, see mainly Pacific and Tropical Maritime systems. In the summer, occasional Tropical Maritime systems move through Montana,but Pacific systems still dominate. ' Geology The appearance of the Gallatin Range and its adjacent valleys is a result of billions of years of ' geologic activity. At the core of the Gallatin Range are igneous and metamorphic rocks formed during the Precambrian Era. These"basement"rocks are dominated by gneiss,but includes schists and granite, as well (Alt and Hyndman 1990). Flooding by shallow seas during the Paleozoic and ' Mesozoic Eras covered the Precambrian basement rock with layers of shale,sandstone,mudstone, siltstone, limestone and conglomerate. These sedimentary rocks include Mississippian Period dolomitic limestone of the Madison group,which contains chert nodules and some quartzite(both of ' these rock types were sometimes used by prehistoric peoples for making chipped stone tools). At the close of the Mesozoic Era,during the Cretaceous Period,mountain building,with its ' heating, stretching,and uplifting,caused the continental crust to break into blocks and gave rise to the Rocky Mountains (Alwin 1983). Those blocks which rose farthest became mountain ranges, while adjacent blocks became intermountain valleys. The Gallatin Range was formed when blocks ' of Precambrian basement rock uplifted along faults that run northwest to southeast. The movement of the basement rock,in turn,caused the layered veneer of Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary rock ' to fold between and over the fault blocks. Basement rock is visible along the northwestern front of some area ranges, while folded layers of sedimentary rock outcrop along the northern fringe of some ranges. By the beginning of the Tertiary Period,most drainages in intermountain areas were in place. ' However, as the Tertiary progressed, drainage patterns changed with the occurrence of succesive very dry periods followed by wetter intervals. Dry times saw drastic drops in surface water. With diminished water flow and runoff, sediments eroded from mountains began to accumulate on ' 12 1 I footslopes and on valley floors. During following wet intervals some of these sediments were washed downslope and downstream, and did not accumulate to the degree they did during dry intervals. As sediments accumulated during dry periods,some drainages were blocked,causing the ' formation of lakes in valleys like the Gallatin Valley. During wet intervals when precipitation was abundant, surface water increased. Valley lakes, including those which developed in the Gallatin ' Valley, breached their shores,cutting new valleys, and forming new terraces. During the Tertiary Period,the floor of the Gallatin Valley was covered with sediments of the Renova Formation. The Renova sediments consist of fine silts, sands, gravels, limestone, and occasionally, coal, as well as volcanic ash. Volcanism was common throughout the region during the Tertiary Period. Eruptions capped all but the northern end of the Gallatin range with andesite and spread ash over large areas. The succession of wet and dry periods of the Tertiary came to an end with the first of several glacial periods that occurred during the Pleistocene Epoch.Evidence of alpine glaciers can be found at the highest elevations in the Gallatin Range..Increased precipitation accompanied glaciation and surface water increased dramatically. Water from glacial and interglacial periods was largely responsible for the final sculpting of the Gallatin Valley. Large volumes of water moved through the valley as the glaciers melted,depositing course gravels on the valley floor and on some of the higher, older terraces. Since the close of the Pleistocene,the middle and lower reaches of the Gallatin River have ' matured and a relatively broad floodplain has developed. Upper reaches of this river flow through a relatively narrow mountain canyon and floodplain development is more restricted. In most areas floodplain deposits of silt, sand,and gravel now cover Pleistocene gravels. Deposition of colluvial sediments on mountain footslopes and alluvial sediments along water courses continues. At the ■ same time,area streams and rivers persist in cutting down through Pleistocene gravels and Tertiary valley fill. Overbank sediments present along Baxter Creek and within the project tract are likely ' Holocene in age. 1 ' 13 CULTURAL SETTING ' Prehistory 'technically, the project area is part of the Northwest Plains subarea of the Plains Culture ' Area. However,because intermountain areas of southwestern Montana are proximal to the Plateau Culture Area,and particularly the Basin Culture Area,some archaeologists feel the project area was influenced by cultural and subsistence characteristics of all three culture areas(Ethnoscience 1991; ' Roll et. al. 1989; Deaver and Deaver 1986; Deaver and Deaver 1984). The majority of projectile points(time sensitive artifacts)found in southwestern Montana fit within the traditional typologies of the Northwestern Plains after Reeves (1983), Frison (1991) and Mulloy (1958). For details of ' chronological schemes applicable to the site area the reader is referred to An Archaeological Overview of Butte District Prehistory by Deaver and Deaver(1986). ' These chronologies are nearly identical in projectile point typologies associated with them. The oldest outline for prehistory in Montana was first set forth by Mulloy(1958)and it formed the ' foundation for subsequent chronologies. The Reeves chronology essentially follows Mulloy and divides prehistory into three periods:Early,Middle,and Late.Reeves refined Mulloy's taxonomy and added other terminology to define prehistoric cultural traditions and phases based on the ' archaeological record. Frison divides prehistory into essentially three periods but further subdivides them. Frison's ' divisions include the Paleoindian Period,the Archaic Period(Early Plains Archaic, Middle Plains Archaic, and Late Plains Archaic), and the Late Prehistoric Period. Frison also applies the term Protohistoric for the period when Euro-American settlement and trade were indirectly influencing the ' aboriginal peoples of the Northern Plains but before contact had actually occurred. Frison has fewer taxonomic subdivisions based on technology and geographic boundaries. He uses "archaic" to suggest change in the emphasis of prehistoric economies with plants emerging as more important in diet at the beginning of the Archaic Period and a focus on bison in the Late Prehistoric Period The Gallatin Valley area includes many of the same archaeological manifestations which are found elsewhere on the Plains including campsites,rock alignments,bison kills,cairns,ceremonial sites, hearths, lithic scatters, pictographs and petroglyphs, hunting pits or blinds, tipi rings, ' rockshelters,trails and wikiup(Deaver and Deaver 1986). Hundreds of sites have been recorded on BLM,Forest Service,State and private lands in the Gallatin and Missouri headwaters area. Surface finds and excavation data indicate this portion of southwestern Montana has been occupied since early Paleoindian times through the Protohistoric Period. Virtually the entire typological sequence of the Northwestern Plains is represented by artifacts found in the vicinity of the project area. ' Protohistory and History It is not until the protohistoric and historic period that modern Native American tribal configurations can be seen. The introduction of the horse and the domino affect of white encroa- chment from the east may have displaced and rearranged Native American groups in Montana and over most of North America. For the most part,it is impossible for archaeologists to determine tribal 14 affiliations,ethnicity,or language from the artifacts prehistoric peoples left behind in southwestern Montana. The project area was used by a variety of American Indians during the protohistoric and his- toric periods. Blackfeet, Flathead, Nez Perce, and Shoshone-Bannack groups ventured into the region at times. The period when contact with whites was actually made and when written records of those ' interactions were made is known as the Historic Period. In Montana, the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1805-1806 is generally accepted as the beginning of the Historic Period. Horses were probably traded from distant Spanish California settlements and likely escaped confinement, ' reaching Montana through natural migration. In any case, horses are estimated to have entered Montana by A.D. 1700 and could have reached the state as early as A.D. 1650. Metal items and guns were also among goods traded during protohistoric times. ' d the cultures of the lain. Prior to the horse the only beast of burden on Horses transformed p y the plains was the dog. Dogs were used to drag a V shaped sled or frame called a travois. The apex of this frame was carried on the dog's back while the open ends of the V dragged on the ground. Material to be hauled was bound to the frame. The travois was later adapted for use with the horse ' and subsequently a much heavier load was carried. Horses allowed individual Native Americans to chase bison and to shoot single animals as ' they rode alongside. Hunting became easier and it was possible to carry larger quantities of personal belongings from camp to camp. The range for hunting and carrying on social interaction was substantially extended. In effect,the horse made it more possible to accumulate wealth in the form of goods of luxury (e.g. blankets, beads, skins, guns, knives, and tobacco) and goods of necessity (food). Horses themselves became one of the most valuable commodities and expression of wealth. Prehistoric foot nomads probably had no comparable measure of wealth. Life became easier for some and the prestige position of chief likely came into being at this time. Horse stealing adventures became an avenue to advancement in wealth and social standing. Vestiges of aboriginal life remained with Montana's Indian even after the coming of trade goods and the settlement of the west ' by whites. Plains Indians continued to hunt big game whenever possible although it became increasingly difficult to survive in that life style as the buffalo neared extinction. Plains aboriginals also continued to use plants for food, in health and medicine, for making tools, and in rituals and ceremonies. ' The coming of the Europeans brought easier access to valued trade goods. White settlement also brought competition for land and food. Worst of all, white civilization brought European diseases, such as smallpox, to which the Native Americans had little resistance. These diseases decimated some tribes reducing their populations by as much as 75 percent. In less than seventy ' years after the Lewis and Clark expedition passed through what is now Montana,the remnants of Plains Indian tribes were placed on reservations,ending 12,000 years of hunting and gathering as a way of life on the plains and in the mountains of Montana. ' 15 ' The wildlife,scenic,and agricultural qualities of the Gallatin Valley were noted very early in the Euro-American history of the west. Passing through the area in the summer of 1806, Captain William Clark noted the abundance of game including elk, deer, antelope, beaver, and bison. A member of the Lewis and Clark Expedition,John Colter,returned to the headwaters of the Missouri in 1808 and together with John Potts set up a fur trading and trapping business. However,both men ' met with Indian hostility,particularly the Blackfeet,and were soon forced out of the area(Potts was in fact killed by the Blackfeet). Trapping soon returned to the area and reached a peak in the 1830s before tapering off after 1850 (Burlingame 1980). Jim Bridger, for whom the Bridger Range is ' named, was among the early trappers and traders who came to southwestern Montana during this period and were successful at the fur trade business. The agricultural potential of the Gallatin Valley began to be realized about the time of major gold strikes in southwestem Montana,particularly in the area around Alder Gulch. Gallatin City was ' the first community in Gallatin County and was established in 1863 just downstream from the confluence of the Madison,Gallatin,and Jefferson Rivers(Cheney 1983). Bozeman was founded in 1864 and was named after John Bozeman who purportedly brought the first wagon train of immigrants to the area that same year. Fort Ellis was built as a military post on the east edge of Bozeman,near the mouth of Rock Creek Canyon,in 1867. Established to allay settler's fear of attack by hostile bands of Sioux and Crow,the fort also served as outfitter for the 1870 Washburn-Langford expedition to what was to become Yellowstone National Park. Fort Ellis was abandoned in 1886. Nelson Story is credited with driving the first cattle herd north from Texas to the Gallatin ' Valley in 1866 and soon after area agriculture began to flourish. Farming and ranching ventures spread outward from the Bozeman and Gallatin City areas. Tourism has replaced agriculture as the number one industry in the Gallatin Valley area although ranching and farming continue. ' Homestead patents for lands encompassing Phase 1 of the Valley West Subdivision were issued to Enoch D. Ferguson on December 1, 1876 (Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder Office ' records—Deed Book K, page 170) and September 10, 1883 (BLM General Land Office records - Serial#MTMTAA042917;Document#214). Ferguson,one of the early settlers of Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley, was issued a homestead patent for lands adjacent to Phase 1 in 1876 and ' apparently began his ranching efforts in 1874. Ferguson is listed in Progressive Men of the State of Montana (Bowen and Co. n.d.). That volume indicates that Ferguson was born in Tennessee in ' 1844,served in the Confederate Army(First Tennessee Cavalry)in 1861,was captured and released and returned to "studies" in Tennessee. Eventually Ferguson moved to Indiana and studied for another year before becoming a teacher. He left Indiana for Montana, via St. Louis, Missouri, in ' 1869 and reached Fort Benton by steamer that same year. Ferguson then apparently traveled to the Bozeman area and "took up a tract of land" about two miles west of Bozeman. He gradually expanded his ranch and raised oats and hay and shorthorn cattle. His residence was in Bozeman,not on the ranch land. In 1874 Ferguson and three others "located"the Rocky Ford coal mine and the Trail Creek coal mine. Ferguson was active in the community and served as the Gallatin County Assessor in 1877 and 1878. He was a member of the Bozeman City Council in 1893,was a school ' trustee for a number of years, and was also a member of the Yellowstone Expedition of 1874. ' 16 r rFIELD METHODS,RESULTS,AND RECOMMENDATIONS rField Methods The first cultural resource survey of the Valley West-Phase 1 project area was conducted by r Stephen A. Aaberg in April of 2002. At that time an intensive pedestrian survey of a 69-acre tract was was carried out and an overview level reconnaisance of all of Phase I was completed. On September 17, 2002, an additional 240-acre tract was intensively survey by field supervisor Chris rCrofutt and field technician Jayme Green. The entire 240-acre tract was inspected in 30 meter spaced transects oriented north-south. The current channel of the Maynard-Border Ditch north of Cascade Street(Figure 4)was also walked. By agreement with the Gallatin County Commission and rthe Gallatin County Historic Preservation Officer, the subdivision developer had been allowed to excavate several road beds into the Phase 1 tract prior to Class III survey. These road cuts provided very good subsurface exposure over much of the Phase 1 tract. The surface of the tract was heavily ' vegetated so presence of the road cuts provided opportunity for substantial subsurface observations. The road cuts varied from about 60cm deep to about 1.25 meters deep. In some instances,the cuts reached precultural stream gravels. Although the project area tract has been cultivated for over 100 years, and currently supports a variety of pasture grasses, surface visibility was relatively good. Visibility was impaired in some areas where tall grasses and weeds covered the surface. rMorrison-Maierle had earlier requested a file search for the project area from the Montana State Historic Preservation Office. The file search indicated that previously recorded archaeological ' sites were not present in the project area. Three previous cultural resource inventories included portions of the township and range in which Phase 1 occurs. One previous cultural resource project included the W1/2NE1/4 of Section 10,just to the east of the Phase 1 project area, but did not ' document any cultural resources (Lahren 2000). Survey Results rPrehistoric archaeological remains of any sort were not found during survey of the Valley West,Phase 1 tract. One historic site(24GA1588)with two features,a small frame building and a rcorral-loading chute,were found and recorded in the southwest portion of Tract 2 in Block 3(Figure 3). The building appears to have been moved to its current location from elsewhere,as it is resting on a partial log sill foundation. The corral consists of an elevated loading chute and several small rpens west of the chute. Also noted near the project area were some irrigation features. The Maynard-Border Ditch flows through the center of the east portion of the Phase 1 parcel. This drainage, and an adjacent corridor on both sides of the stream, will not be developed and will be maintained as a park. r Although this feature is classified as a ditch, it is actually a natural drainage that carries irrigation water from the Farmers Canal, well south of the project area. It carries a yearly natural flow from various small springs located upstream from the Phase 1 tract. This feature has been substantially r altered in recent years as Bozeman has expanded into the area. Only the portion of this drainage that flows through the Phase 1 tract was inspected during field survey. Irrigation features of any sort(e.g. turnouts, laterals)were not evident within Phase 1. This drainage is not listed in a compilation of r 17 1 ' early Gallatin County irrigation features compiled by Dr.Robert Dunbar of Montana State University and published by Bates (1994). An 1868 GLO map of Township 2 North, Range 5 East (Marsh 1868) shows no agricultural developments whatsoever in Section 10. The Baxter Creek Ditch appears to be the oldest primary irrigation feature in the vicinity but ' has been substantially altered in this portion of Bozeman as new streets and utility corridors were constructed. A portion of the Baxter Creek Ditch occurs inside the Phase 1 project area but it will not be affected by proposed development. ' Although portions of Section 10 were part of the Ferguson ranch,historic features associated with the ranch(if there were any),were not apparent. As mentioned earlier,the Ferguson home was ' located within the city of Bozeman. ' Resource Descriptions Site 24GA1588 Description The site consists of a small frame shed (Feature 1) and a nearby corral and loading chute (Feature 2).The property is located in a hay field on the east side of Baxter Creek within the Gallatin ' Valley. Baxter Creek flows north to the east fork of the Gallatin River. Baxter Ditch runs north- south approximately 1/4 mile east of the property. Adjacent land is dominated by cultivated fields, mostly hay,with new subdivisions and other urban construction activity essentially surrounding the ' site. Feature 1 is a small, single room,frame building constructed with 2 x 8 inch vertical studs (milled lumber)that are covered with shiplap siding(no interior or sub-wall). The feature exhibits a single pitch shed style roof that slopes west and the shed has a plank floor. The only doorway(no door remaining)is on the south end of the north elevation. The east facade has three, side by side, window portals with no trim and no glass remaining. The south and west elevations have no windows or doors. The feature does not appear to be resting on a formal foundation although an approximately 15"-diameter log, running north—south beneath the the middle of the building,may ' have been an attempt to level the structure. Roof rafters are 2"x 4"s(true dimension)with fascia and open soffit. Remnants of white paint are still present on the siding. Corrugated tin covers the roof. The feature measures 14.2'north—south by 12.5'east west.The west wall is Thigh and the east wall ' is 9.3'high. The only items present in this shed were some old tires and it appears that the shed was used for storage. ' Feature 2is a loading chute with associated pens or corrals. The corral is constructedo f a combination of 6"diameter posts and railroad ties with horizontal log poles/rails ranging from to ' 5" in diameter. The gates are made from 2" x 8" milled boards that are hung with large, stamped metal hinges. The horizontal rail poles are are fastened to posts with modern wire nails. The loading chute is mostly collapsed as are portions of the corral fence. The chute was constructed of posts and ' rails and had a sloping ramp with a board floor supported by railroad tie cross beams. The feature, including loading chute and corral, measures approximately 60 meters north—south by 27 meters east—west. ' is i ' The dates of construction for this site have not been firmly established. A chain of title search was carried out at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. Results of that search ' show that the property stayed in the Ferguson family until 1961 when Veda Ferguson Purdy sold a tract of land,which included the site area,to James and Jean Ray. The Rays retained the property until 1971 when they sold it to J. Patrick McGloin. A month after acquiring the property McGloin sold it to Frank P.Zoch,Jr.and he in turn sold the property to Robert R. Shelton within a week. The Shelton family,who also purchased the Flying D and Spanish Creek Ranches near Gallatin Gateway at about the same time, retained the property until 1978 when it was sold to Virgil and Phyllis ' Jahnke. The Jahnkes initiated development of this land and surrounding lands and subsequent developers continued the process. Since 1978 the Valley Subdivision,just east of.Valley West,has grown substantially,particularly during the 1990s. ' Construction materials used in the site features include milled lumber,milled posts,railroad ' ties, corrugated metal roofing, and wire nails and spikes. All of these materials post-date 1900. Some of the posts in the corral are not completely weathered and the bases of some appear to be treated. The only other artifacts obsderved at the site were two badly rusted automobile parts(fender fragment and body fragment) that were found along Baxter Creek just west of the site. The fragmentary condition of the car parts prevented identification of the make,model and age although generally they appear to associate with a vehicle that pre-dates 1950. It is not clear if these old car ' parts associate with the site. Some physical evidence suggests that the shed was moved to the site. The area encompassed ' by the corrals suggests that the site was a very small livestock enclosure and that the associated loading chute was likely used only locally. The site was not likely a regional or area livestock shipping center but was more likely used by a single family or ranch or perhaps by a few neighbors. ' The Shelton Ranches were among largest est cattle producers in Gallatin County and it is g possible that the corrals and loading chute date only to the early 1970s. The Spanish Creek and ' Flying D Ranches encompassed lands that originally included a number of homesteads and smaller ranches with numerous buildings. Athough it is possible that the shed at the site was moved there from the Shelton Ranches—Flying D/Spanish Creek holdings,it is equally possible that the corral ' and loading chute pre-date ownership by the Sheltons. Droplap and shiplap siding was very popular during the 1920s, 1930s,and early 1940s and these materials argue that the shed pre-dates Shelton ownership. If the shed(Feature 1)was erected on site,and was not moved to the property later,then ' it likely dates to the era of between 1920 and 1940 (unless used or recycled construction materials were employed). The property was still owned by the Ferguson family during this era although ' Enoch Ferguson had passed away. National Register Status and Recommendations Based on observations of construction materials used in site features, it is unlikely that the site associates with the earliest era of farming and ranching undertaken by Enoch D. Ferguson. While it is possible that the site features were constructed during ownership of the land by the ' Ferguson family, it is equally possible the shed and loading chute-corral post-date Ferguson ownership. Absence of any other historic features and absence of any other historic artifacts(with 19 1 the exception of two rusty car parts)indicates the site was not associated with a larger farmstead or ranchstead. Architecturally the features at this site do not meet requirements for significance under Criterion C. Features are in poor condition and even in their original form,in good condition,would ' not likely have met requirements for architectural significance. The site also fails to meet requirements under Criteria A and D. The site is one of many local loading chutes and corrals associated with the 20t'Century livestock industry in Montana and the Gallatin Valley. It does not 1 appear to associate with.a larger ranchstead and may have been used temporarily. The site has limited information value and would not likely contribute further to our understanding of local or regional history. If the site features dated to the time when the land was part of the early, Enoch ' Ferguson farming and ranching effort, it could have been significant under Criterion B through association with Ferguson. However,construction materials used in the features and presence of two rusted car parts suggest the site likely dates to between 1920 and 1950,if not later. Therefore the site is suggested as non-significant and ineligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. SUMMARY The project tract was intensively inspected on foot in September of 2002. Surface and ' subsurface exposures on the project area tract are considered adequate. Prehistoric archaeological materials or deposits were not found during survey of the entire 240 acre Phase 1 tract of the Valley West Subdivision. Proposed subdivision developments will not affect any known,National Register ' eligible cultural resources within the project tract. One historic site (24GA1588)recorded during survey is suggested as non-significant and not eligible for listing in the National Register. Further cultural resource investigations or mitigative measures are not warranted at this time. ' 20 ' REFERENCES CITED ' Aaberg, Stephen A. 2002 Valley West Subdivision-Phase 1, Gallatin County, Montana Class III Cultural Resource Survey Results. Contract report by ACRCS,Billings,Montana,prepared for Morrison-Maierle, ' Inc. as agents for Bozeman Lakes, LLC,Bozeman,Montana. Alt, David and Donald W. Hyndman ' 1990 Roadside Geology of Montana. Mountain Press Publishing Company, Missoula, MT. Alwin, John A. ' 1983 Western Montana: A Portrait of the Land and Its People. Montana Geographic Series,No. 5. Montana Magazine, Helena, MT. ' Bates, Grace 1994 Gallatin County Places and Things Present and Past(Second Edition). Bowen, A.W. & Company no date Progressive Men of the State of Montana. A.W. Bowen&Company, Chicago. Bureau of Land Management-Montana State Office 2002 General Land Office records- Serial#MTMTAA042917; Document# 214 recording homestead patent of Enoch D. Ferguson in 1883 for a portion of Section 10, T2S, RSE. Burlingame, M.G. ' 1980 The Montana Frontier. Big Sky Books. Montana State University. Cheney, R.C. ' 1983-Names on the Face of Montana. Mountain Press Publishing Company,Missoula, MT. Deaver, Sherri and Ken Deaver ' 1986 An Archaeological Overview of Butte District Prehistory.Bureau of Land Management Cultural Resource Series, Number 2. iDeaver, Ken and Sherrie Deaver 1984 Archaeological Site Testing and Evaluation in the Beartrap Canyon of Madison County, ' Montana. Report prepared for Bureau of Land Management, Butte District. Ethnoscience 1993 Mitigation of Sites 24MA225 and 24M4557, Bear Trap Canyon, Montana,edited by Ken Deaver. Contract report for Montana Department of Highways, Helena, MT. Frison, George C. 1991 Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains(revised 1991). Academic Press,New York. ' 21 1 Lahren,Larry A. 2000 Fluidyne-Ferguson Avenue Sub-Division-Gallatin County, Montana(WI/2NE1/4 Section 10, T2S, RSE). Marsh, B.F. 1868 General Land Office Map of Township 2 South,Range 5 East, surveyed by B.F. Marsh in 1868 and approved by Surveyor General in 1869. Map archived in the Montana State Office of the Bureau of Land Management, Billings, Montana. Mulloy, William T. 1958 A Preliminary Historical Outline for the Northwestern Plains. University of Wyoming ' Publications 22(1),Laramie. ' Reeves,Brian O.K. 1983 Culture Change in the Northern Plains: 1000 B.C.-A.D. 1000. Archaeological Survey of Alberta Occasional Paper No. 20. ' Roll,Tom E. 1982 Kootenai Canyon Archaeology: The 1979 LAURD Project Final Mitigation Report. ' Report by Montana State University to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District. Roll, Tom E., William P. Eckerle, and Stephen A. Aaberg 1989 Bear Trap Canyon Archaeology. Report submitted to the Butte District, Bureau of Land Management. 1 ' 22 APPENDIX A: Montana Cultural Resource Information Forms,Maps,and Photographs For Site 24GA1588 1 ' 23 MONTANA CULTURAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM FORM Form No. 1: Locational Information ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.1 Smithsonian Number: 1.2 Field Designation: MM-VW-1 1.3 County: Gallatin 24GA1588 -------------------------—-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 1.4 Township/Range/Section: T2S,RSE, SWl/4SE1/4NE1/4 Section 9 ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.5 UTM Coordinates: Zone 12; 491672mE. 5058149mN. 1.6 Property Type/Types: Historic-Shed-and-Corral-Loading Chute --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 1.7 Recording status: X surface examination photo X map tested Comments and recommendations: further work not recommended ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.8 Administrative/surface ownership: Private—Valley West L.L.C., Calistoga, California (Forest/Region/District/Office) -�9-Mineral Ownership------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.10 Project Name: Valley West Subdivision Phase 1 Project Number: ------------------------------------------------------------—--------------------------—------—------------------ 1.11 General Narrative Description of Property:The site consists of a small frame shed(Feature ' 1)and a nearby corral and loading chute(Feature 2).The property is located in a hay field on the east side of Baxter Creek within the Gallatin Valley. Baxter Creek flows north to the east fork of the ' Gallatin River. Baxter Ditch runs north-south approximately'/4 mile east of the property. Adjacent land is dominated by cultivated fields, mostly hay, with new subdivisions and other urban construction activity essentially surrounding the site. ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.12-----------------Map Reference(Attach 81/2 x 11" USGS Photocopy): 7.5 'USGS Bozeman, Montana Quadrangle 1.13 Vicinity of(city/town): Bozeman, Montana — -- 1.14 Narrative of access: From Bozeman, Montana,take Huffine Lane (U.S. Route 191)west to the Cottonwood Road intersection. Turn right(north)on Cottonwood Road and proceed for approximately %2 mile to the intersection of West Babcock Street. Turn down a small, two track ' access road to the left that crosses a section fence. The site is on the east side of Baxter Creek, with a cultivated field surrounding it. MONTANA CULTURAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM FORM Form No. 2: Environmental Setting Site No. 24GA1588 (MM-VW-1) _ 2.1 Geographic Setting: The site is located within the Gallatin Valley in southwest Montana. The valley is dominated by flat terraces with shallow cut tributaries of the East Gallatin and Gallatin Rivers. Baxter Creek, which may be a man-made drainage, flows just west of the site. Hay fields and wheat fields dominate the surrounding landscape where subdivisions have not yet invaded. ' ------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- 2.2 Elevation: 4820' msl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.3 View/aspect(estimated direction and distance): Open in all directions ------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.4 Major River Drainage: East Gallatin River ' 2.5 Minor Drainage: Baxter Creek 2.6 Available water sources: ' Name Distance Elevation Change Type 1. Baxter Creek 15 meters 4' perennial creek 2. Maynard-Border Ditch '/2 mile 35' irrigation ditch -------------------------- 2.7 Vegetation--regional: Valley grasslands with cottonwood trees 2.8 Vegetation—local: cultivated farmlands,thistle, grasses,dandelion 2.9 Sediments/Deposition: Silty loam of varying depth(0.5— 1.5 meters) over river and ' Pleistocene gravels. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.10 Surface Visibility/season of survey: Poor to fair, from 0—25% surface visibility ' because of vegetative cover; subsurface visibility was good because of the presence of numerous recent road cuts. --------------------- ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.11 Other environmental factors pertaining to site: MONTANA CULTURAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM FORM Form No.3: Assessment,Recording and Management Documentation Site No. 24GA1588 (MM-VW-1) _ 3.1 Condition/integrity: Poor. The two features are in relatively poor condition. .Feature 1 (shed)has no remaining windows or doors and is open to the elements. This feature could have been moved to its current location. Feature 2,the corral and loading chute, is also in poor condition. The post and rail fence is falling in several places and the loading chute has nearly completely collapsed. 3.2 Evaluation: Does this property meet National Register criteria for eligibility? es X no ' Evaluation Procedures/Justification: Based on observations of construction materials used in site features, it is unlikely that the site associates with the earliest era of farming and ranching undertaken by Enoch D. Ferguson. While it is possible that the site features were constructed during ownership of the land by the ' Ferguson family, it is equally possible the shed and loading chute-corral post-date Ferguson ownership. Absence of any other historic features and absence of any other historic artifacts(with the exception of two rusty car parts)indicates the site was not associated with a larger farmstead or ranchstead. Architecturally the features at this site do not meet requirements for significance under ' Criterion C. Features are in poor condition and even in their original form,in good condition,would not likely have met requirements for architectural significance. The site also fails to meet requirements under Criteria A and D. The site is one of many local loading chutes and corrals ' associated with the 20`h Century livestock industry in Montana and the Gallatin Valley. It does not appear to associate with a larger ranchstead and may have been used temporarily. The site has limited information value and would not likely contribute further to our understanding of local or ' regional history. If the site features dated to the time when the land was part of the early, Enoch Ferguson farming and ranching effort, it could have been significant under Criterion B through association with Ferguson. However,construction materials used in the features and presence of two ' • rusted car parts suggest the site likely dates to between 1920 and 1950,i£not later. Therefore the site is suggested as non-significant and ineligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.3 Possible impacts to site: The site is located on a proposed residential development(Valley West Subdivision). The structures likely occur within a designated green space but because the site features are collapsing,they may be razed or moved. ' 3.4 Recommendations: The site is suggested as non-significant and further investigation is not gg � g recommended. Form No.3 (continued) Site No. 24GA1588 (MM-VW-1 ' -------------------------------------_------------- -------------- 3.5 Site located by: C. Crofutt and J. Green Date: 9/17/02 3.6 Site recorded by: C. Crofutt and J. Green Date: 9/19/02 ' 3.7Site form update and revisions by----------------------------------------- Date - ------------------- 3.8 Federal or State Permit No.: ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.9 Publication(s)/Report(s)where site is described: Valley West Subdivision-Phase I, Gallatin County, Montana Addendum to Cultural Resource Survey Results(Aaberg et al. 2002) ----- --------------------------------~----------------------- 3.10 Artifact Repository: None,collected ------ ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 3.11 Field notes/maps/photo repository: Aaberg Cultural Resource Consulting Service, 2909 East MacDonald Drive, Billings,Montana 59102 3.12 Photo and accession numbers: Olympus Digital Camera; photo files P9190022.JPG, P9190023.JPG, P9190024.JPG,P9190025.JPG,P9190026.JPG,P9190027.JPG, P9190028.JPG, ' P9190029.JPG, P9190030.JPG, P9190031.JPG, P9190032.JPG, P9190033.JPG,P9190034.JPG ****** ************ ***FOR OFFICE USE ONLY*************************** ' 3.13 Management Data: Formal Determination of Eligibility: undetermined date: formally determined ineligible for NRHP date: ' formal consensus determination, eligible for NRHP date: Listed on NRHP date: Updated Management Information: date: MONTANA CULTURAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM FORM ' Form No. 5: Description of Historic Sites Site No. 24GA1588 04M-VW-1 ' 5.1 Property boundaries and justification:---------~----r-------------------------------------------- estimated- ' --- measured- 260 meters N/S, 140 meters E/W (derived from map) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.2 Physical description of buildings/structures/features; dates of construction & major ' alterations; contribution of buildings/structure to property significance: Feature 1 is a small, single room, frame building constructed with 2 x 8 inch vertical studs (milled lumber)that are covered with shiplap siding(no interior or sub-wall). The feature exhibits a ' single pitch shed style roof that slopes west and the shed has a plank floor. The only doorway(no door remaining) is on the south end of the north elevation. The east facade has three, side by side, window portals with no trim and no glass remaining. The south and west elevations have no windows or doors. The feature does not appear to be resting on a formal foundation although an approximately 15"-diameter log, running north—south beneath the the middle of the building,may have been an attempt to level the structure. Roof rafters are 2"x 4"s(true dimension)with fascia and open soffit. Remnants of white paint are still present on the siding. Corrugated tin covers the roof. The feature measures 14.2'north—south by 12.5'east—west.The west wall is Thigh and the east wall is 9.3'high. The only items present in this shed were some old tires and it appears that the shed was used for storage. 1 Feature 2 is a loading chute with associated pens or corrals. The corral is constructed of a combination of 6"diameter posts and railroad ties with horizontal log poles/rails ranging from 4"to 5" in diameter. The gates are made from 2" x 8" milled boards that are hung with large, stamped metal hinges. The horizontal rail poles are are fastened to posts with modern wire nails. The loading chute is mostly collapsed as are portions of the corral fence. The chute was constructed of posts and rails and had a sloping ramp with a board floor supported by railroad tie cross beams. The feature, including loading chute and corral, measures approximately 60 meters north—south by 27 meters east—west. ' -------- The dates of construction-for this site have not been firmly established---------------------- 5.3 Artifacts observed,collected: Two badly rusted pieces of an old automobile(fender and body fragments)are present along Baxter Creek,just west of F-1. Make,model, and age of vehicle the parts were associated with were not determined. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 5.4 Subsurface Testing Methods and Results: None conducted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 5.5 Historical information and context(footnote sources): A chain of title search was carried out at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. Results of that search show that the property was patented by Enoch D. Ferguson in 1876. Upon his death the property was titled to 1 Form No. 5 (continuedf Site No. 24GA1588 (MM-VW-1) 5.5 (continued) his widow Nettie Ferguson who conveyed the property to her son Enoch D. Ferguson;Jr. and Agnes Ferguson in 1927. In 1942 ownership was tranferred by Enoch D. Ferguson Jr. and Agnes Ferguson to Veda Ferguson Purdy. The property stayed in the Ferguson family until 1961 when Veda Ferguson Purdy sold a tract of land,which included the site area,to James and Jean Ray. The Rays retained the property until 1971 when they sold it to J. Patrick McGloin. A month after acquiring the property McGloin sold it to Frank P. Zoch,Jr. and he in turn sold the property to Robert R. Shelton within a week. The Shelton family,who also purchased the Flying D and Spanish Creek Ranches near Gallatin Gateway at about the same time,retained the property until 1978 when it was sold to Virgil and Phyllis Jahnke. The Jahnkes initiated development of this land and surrounding lands and subsequent developers continued the process. Since 1978 the Valley Subdivision,just east of Valley West,has grown substantially,particularly during the ' 1990s. Construction materials used in the site features include milled lumber,milled posts,railroad ties, corrugated metal roofing, and wire nails and spikes. All of these materials post-date 1900. Some of the posts in the corral are not completely weathered and the bases of some appear to be ' treated. The only other artifacts obsderved at the site were two badly rusted automobile parts(fender fragment and body fragment) that were found along Baxter Creek just west of the site. The fragmentary condition of the car parts prevented identification of the make,model and age although generally they appear to associate with a vehicle that pre-dates 1950. It is not clear if these old car ' parts associate with the site. Some physical evidence suggests that the shed was moved to the site. The area encompassed by the corrals suggests that the site was a very small livestock enclosure and that the associated loading chute was likely used only locally. The site was not likely a regional or area livestock shipping center but was more likely used by a single family or ranch or perhaps by a few neighbors. The Shelton Ranches were among the largest cattle producers in Gallatin County and it is possible that the corrals and loading chute date only to the early 1970s. The Spanish Creek and ' Flying D Ranches encompassed lands that originally included a number of homesteads and smaller ranches with numerous buildings. Athough it is possible that the shed at the site was moved there from the Shelton Ranches—Flying D/Spanish Creek holdings, it is equally possible ' that the corral and loading chute pre-date ownership by the Sheltons. Droplap and shiplap siding was very popular during the 1920s, 1930s, and early 1940s and these materials argue that the shed pre-dates Shelton ownership. If the shed(Feature 1)was erected on site, and was not ' moved to the property later,then it likely dates to the era of between 1920 and 1940(unless used or recycled construction materials were employed). The property was still owned by the Ferguson family during this era although Enoch Ferguson had passed away. Enoch D. Ferguson, one of the early settlers of Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley, was ' issued a homestead patent for lands adjacent to Phase 1 in 1876 and apparently began his ranching efforts in 1874. Ferguson is listed in Progressive Men of the State of Montana(Bowen and Co. n.d.). That volume indicates that Ferguson was born in Tennessee in 1844, served in the 1 Form No. 5 (continued) Site No. 24GA1588 (MM-VW-1) 1 5.5 (continued) Confederate Army(First Tennessee Cavalry) in 1861, was captured and released and returned to "studies" in Tennessee. Eventually Ferguson moved to Indiana and studied for another year ' before becoming a teacher. He left Indiana for Montana,via St. Louis, Missouri, in 1869 and reached Fort Benton by steamer that same year. Ferguson then apparently traveled to the Bozeman area and "took up a tract of land" about two miles west of Bozeman. He gradually ! expanded his ranch and raised oats and hay and shorthorn cattle. His residence was in Bozeman, not on the ranch land. In 1874 Ferguson and three others "located"the Rocky Ford coal mine and the Trail Creek coal mine. Ferguson was active in the community and served as the Gallatin County Assessor in 1871 and 1878. He was also a member of the Bozeman City Council in 1893 and was a school trustee for a number of years. Ferguson was also a member of the infamous Yellowstone Expedition of 1874. 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.6 Sources,files, people consulted: Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office Bates, Grace: 1994 Gallatin County Places and Things Present and Past(Second Edition). ! Bowen, A.W. & Company: no date Progressive Men of the State of Montana. A.W. Bowen & Company, Chicago. 1 i i 1 i 1 . •� � I I i1 / I / I I / �� � :������ ��� ■ ■Pik/_��» : t • ii . i � . � . t � i t r � t . t . 1 1 24GA1588 MN I (MM-VW-I) 9/19/02 J. Green ' ® =Datum 50 meters Building ' 1 Fi 2 ..••� = Corral 1 =Site j 1 Boundary V? ;.....� -z i -` 1 '••••�� =Fence � 1 1 Car Parts\ Baxter F-1 Creek r Historic Ranch Structures,NM-VW-1 Site sketch map 1 i 0 0 p 1 South and east fagade of Feature 1 (F-1),looking northwest a 0 r� NIArM a+ 01 0 North and east faVade of Feature 1 (F-1),looking southwest na 1 1 ' North and west fagade of Feature 1 (F-1),looking southeast ti asp } _ Collapsed chute on the east side of Feature 2 (F-2),looking west 1 1 1 1 VA ' * J �" ' is _° ►1, ,O- t,' §—"-,�w 5 1 ' Corral and pens that make up Feature 2 (F-2),looking north 1 - X'p ` a s A 5 ii• , 5 f Baxter Creek flowing along the west edge of Feature 2 (F-2), looking northwest 1 ' �.. r,,_. � ..... •fig�.,. °-^L ..-,m,�--� ..r-- 1 Corral(F-2) overview,looking west 1 t ' Baxter Creek(along tree line),looking south t 1 ' Baxter Creek(along tree line),looking northwest r t ;��� ?:+yet• , {( " Ile. View of Baxter Ditch that runs along the west side of tCottonwood Road,east of 24GA1588,looking north 1 ' Feature 1 Feature 2 � F ' Site overview,looking northwest ' Feature 1 Feature 2 5.1 3 +�• r ' Area overview,looking northwest 1 tArea overview,looking east 1 t 1 - I x i I ' 4 8Ti - - - 3 0 7$1-T- rar aaw y� ED d 4786AT ' •4B S T Site 4GA 1588 ' -VW-1) j ValleWest Subdivision! i f I roje Area i • e I —-- ._.. I ra_ _ r... �,5eaa svt Dill F n ds \ �,N 1ro 15 4891 f 4931 Bozeman Quadrangle,Gallatin County-Montana,USGS 7.5' Topographic with Valley West Subdivision and Site Location. 1 1 •'1i� '� l' ",�rS..r ?'" \` .nb♦•�•ys�'�Jr♦"\.4,. �.' / 1 �, i�v •R .�ltL,=sue_ :� • �rP"%.t ��,•~' a' :�� . �,' -� �',� r.,•f,���`t� '�•x'.'.,�'�1\�� ,.;�; ' �' r�'• x- �•r •!1 f��, �.�y t"�.ii •y v� '' �•..�f �� 1 y aY�••�• g� �: 4t, ,, c:f � •s� J ,.~v/1 P f � '✓f�.� •` lT ` t•y^��,f �t "� .1^,f'`^• A t° r��t•''•1i• �..,♦`" `," " f �,- y �+ ' as ;.. :,•,���+ �'`� , ;�:.,,,, 4..'�rr�. -r:!�c�s M �•`.4...r. •'^.' rO1.�Hs.f;�: rila'�i<71�' y, r tn� - i 1 • • • �•, • JF a• ' ARCHI-FECTS ' ' TRADITIONALVALLEY WEST COMMUNITY LIVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT \" Ic rd.; ��4s"�� g'{I.��:�'��As\� Cr �1 r.•\�,Ar�. RNAL 7 V. J REVIEWED AFe1PROVED . AND MMU IT jff�VELOf' Jim � a DIRE TOFF . ��D��,A,,,RT��'_Pir OF PIAIV�!'.'it; I1 DATE ,��lLn. • VALLEY WEST - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ` ` ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS Responses to Valley West PUD Conditions Section 1) Required Documents Applicants and Owners................................................ 1 Legal Description of Site.............................................. 2 Certified Property Owners List..................................... 3 Statement of Applicable City Land Use Policies (Bozeman 2020 Plan).................................................. 4 Statement of Community Design Objectives ............... 5 NotUsed...... .............................................................. 6 Project Schedule ......................................................... 7 2) Site Plan and Supplemental Plan Maps Exhibits: .. ............................................................... 8 Master Plan Phase I Plan Pedestrian Plan Land Use Summary Street Names Traffic Circulation Existing Site Conditions Available (Existing) Street Facilities Available (Existing) Water Facilities Available (Existing) Sewer Facilities Adjacent Land Uses 3) Supplemental Plan Requirements OpenSpace ..................................................:............ 9 Street Cross Sections.................................................. 10 DrainagePlan.............................................................. 11 ii VALLEY WEST - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Section Valley West Subdivision — Phase I Preliminary Plat.... 12 Traffic Impact Study..................................................... 13 Landscape Plan........................................................... 14 Development Guidelines ............................................. 15 Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions..................... 16 NotUsed....... ............................................................. 17 Durston Road .............................................................. 18 PRELIMINARY PLAT INFORMATION — ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Section l�> Surface Water/Wetlands ........................................................ 19 GroundWater......................................................................... 20 Geology-Soils-Slopes............................................................. 21 Vegetation .............................................................................. 22 Wildlife.................................................................................... 23 Historical Features ................................................................. 24 VisualImpact.......................................................................... 25 COMMUNITY IMPACT REPORT Section WaterSupply.......................................................................... 26 Sewage Disposal.................................................................... 27 Solid Waste ........................................................................... 28 OW Streets and Roads.................................................................. 29 iii VALLEY WEST - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Section Utilities.................................................................................... 30 Emergency Services...................................................... 31 Schools .................................................................................. 32 LandUse................................................................................ 33 Housing .................................................................................. 34 Parks and Recreational Facilities........................................... 35 Taxation .................................................................................. 36 Accessibility of Service Systems and Facilities ...................... 37 Effects on Agriculture ............................................................. 38 Effects on Agricultural Water User Facilities .......................... 39 SUMMARY OF PROBABLE IMPACTS Section The Effect on Agriculture and Proposed Mitigation ................ 40 The Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts.............................................. 41 The Effect on 'Local Services and Proposed Mitigation OfImpacts .......... ......... ..................................................... 42 The Effect on the Natural Environment and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts ........ ..................................................... 43 The Effect on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts ........ ..................................................... 44 The Effect on Public Health and Safety and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts ............................................................. 45 iv �► i At its January 22, 2002 public hearing, the Bozeman City Commission voted unanimously,.. 5-;O .to conditionally approve the Valley West Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan. Approval was granted contingent upon the applicant satisfactorily meeting the conditions detailed on the following pages. Each condition is presented below, as it appears in the final conditions of approval. The Applicants response to each specific condition and a description of how that condition will be met with the submittal of the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan follows in bold type. These responses are hereby made a part of the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan by the statements made below or modifications referenced to the final plan document. PUD Plan Specific Conditions: Planning: 1. That the applicant shall submit a Final PUD Plan for each subsequent phase of development at the time of filing that particular phase, which will enable the PUD Plan to be adjusted or modified for future housing demands, trail system design, etc. The Final PUD Plan for each subsequent phase shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and the Design Review Board. Response: An update to the Final PUD Plan will be submitted for each • subsequent phase of the development at the time of filing that particular phase. The requirements of the Final PUD Plan will be determined during the pre-application plan review for subsequent phases. 2. That the applicant provide an Implementation Plan (construction and time schedule) for the trail system for the entire subdivision to be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board and subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. This document shall be submitted as part of the Final PUD plan for each phase. Response: The overall implementation plan for the trail system coincides with the development schedule for the overall property. This schedule is included Section 7 — Project Schedule of the Final PUD Plan submittal. An implementation Plan for the trail system specific to each phase of the development will be submitted with the Final PUD Plan Update to be submitted with each phase as described in the response to condition 1. 3. Per the recommendation of the State Historic Preservation Office, a cultural resource inventory shall be conducted and results submitted to the Planning Department for their review and approval prior to initiation of construction. Response: A cultural resource inventory for the Valley West Planned Unit Development will be provided for inclusion in Section 24 — Historical Page 1 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondifions.doc 0 • Features of the Final PUD Plan submittal. A cultural resource inventory for • the Valley West Planned Unit Subdivision — Phase #1 has been provided to the City under a previous submittal. 4. That the applicant shall make the necessary clerical corrections and/or edits within the Covenants and Final PUD plan as directed by City Staff. Response: The clerical corrections and/or edits within the Covenants and Final PUD Plan are incorporated into this Final Plan submittal. 5. That the applicant provide pigmented or colored pedestrian pathways where alleys intersect with pedestrian pathways and where pedestrian pathways cross streets. Response: The pigmented or colored pedestrian pathways, as required, under this condition, have been incorporated into the plans and specifications for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1. These plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman Engineering and Planning Departments. The pigmented pedestrian pathways will be incorporated into future plans and specifications where alleys or streets intersect pedestrian pathways. • .6. That the proposed soft surface path along the Maynard Border Park shall be constructed to a Class II trail type with an organic or clay binder rolled in. Response: The soft surface path along the Maynard Border Park will be a Class II trail type. The master plan for the portion of the park to be constructed as part of the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 has been reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman. Similar plans and procedures will be used for construction of the remainder of the path. 7. That all boulevard trees must be located outside the street vision triangle. Applicant shall obtain the necessary boulevard tree permits from the Forestry Division. Response: The boulevard trees along Babcock St., the east side of Clifden Drive, and the west side of Hanley Avenue are part of the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 landscape plan. Landscape plans for these areas have been reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman. All necessary permits have been obtained prior to planting. 8. That the maximum fence height for corner side yards and front yards will be 4 feet, unless it is within a street vision triangle and then the maximum • height will be thirty (30) inches. Page 2 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASEIATUDCondiUons.doc • Response: This condition has been added to the Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Valley West. (Article IV; Section 11) 9. That the applicant supply, in detail, sketches and drawings for architectural guidelines and landscaping requirements contained within the Covenants. The applicant shall supply a section defining architectural and landscaping terms. The revised Covenants shall be provided to the planning Department for review and approval prior to filing of any plat. Response: The Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Valley West is modified to include this information. The additional . information required by this condition is provided throughout the revised covenants. 10. That within the Covenants under the Chimneys/Roof Vents section (page 14), additional wording shall be added as follows (underline added). "All roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into overall design and screened. Vents projecting from the roof shall be painted to match overall roof material color. Roof-top equipment and vents shall not face a public street." • Response: The Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Valley West are modified to include the additional wording required by this condition. (Article IV; Section 6) 11. That the Covenants under the Yards section (page 16) shall contain the following language: "Any fence or wall constructed so as to have only one elevation "finished", which shall be defined as not having its supporting members significantly visible, shall be erected such that the finished elevation of the fence is exposed to the adjacent property". Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article IV; Section 11) 12. That the Covenants under the Yards section (page 16) shall note the maximum fence height of five feet unless a variance is requested and granted by the City Commission. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article IV; Section 11) 13. That the Covenants shall contain the following language regarding attached garages: "Attached garages shall be clearly subordinate to the dwelling. A subordinate garage has one or more of the following characteristics: Page 3 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOGS\FPLAT-PHASElATUDCondiUons.doc 0 a) The area of the garage vehicle door(s) comprise 30% or less of the total square footage, exclusive of any exposed roof areas, of the principle fagade of the dwelling; b) The fagade with the garage vehicle(s) entrance is recessed at least four feet behind the fagade of the dwelling containing the main entry. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article V; Section 1) 14. That within all.sections of the Covenants, when a variance is indicated that it may be granted, the variance must be requested and approved by either . the Valley West Architectural Review Committee or the Bozeman City Commissions depending on whether the variance is from the Covenants or from current City Zoning Ordinance. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article VII; Section 4) 15. That within the pertinent sections of the Covenants, it shall be noted that construction may not commence without the approval of the City of Bozeman Building Division and necessary permits obtained and fees collected. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article VII; Section 5; Step 3) 16. That the Covenants under Construction Design Review section shall contain the following: "The Valley West Architectural Review.Committee's (VWARC) approval letter must be attached to all City of Bozeman building permit applications." Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article VII; Section 5; Step 3) 17. That the Covenants shall contain the language regarding lighting as contained in Section 16 of the Preliminary PUD Plan as well as the following language: "Recessed or can lighting is encouraged for porches or main entrances for softer lighting effects. Clear glass fixtures (i.e. coach lantern style) are discouraged. Honey glass or amber glass panels (i.e. opaque) are encouraged as an alternate. No exposed bulbs (non- cutoff) are allowed." Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this • condition. (Article IV; Section 10) Page 4 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASEIA\PUDCondiUons.doc • 18. That the applicant shall be allowed one (1) temporary sign during construction. This sign shall be a maximum of thirty-two square feet and contain all necessary and desired information .(i.e. named of developer, real estate agency, contractor, financial institution, etc.). The applicant shall obtain the necessary sign permit through the Planning Department. Response: Two temporary 4'x8' signs will be erected during construction for the Valley West Subdivision Phase #1 as requested by the applicant and approved by the City Commission. An illustration of the subdivision identification sign will be provided to the Planning Department prior to installation. The necessary sign permit will be obtained prior to installation. No signs will be erected until sign permit approval is obtained through the City of Bozeman Planning Department. 19. That the applicant provide a detailed description of the pedestrian crossing east/west across Cottonwood Road, approximately half way between Babcock Street and Durston Road. Response: A detailed illustration of the pedestrian crossing of Cottonwood Road is provided within the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan submittal, Section 29 — Streets and Roads. 20. That the applicant shall provided detailed cross-sections of all pocket parks that contain detention ponds area. The cross sections shall describe type of landscaping proposed and how the detention area will work with the proposed meandering pedestrian pathway. Response: A typical cross-section of pocket parks that contain detention ponds is added within the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan submittal, Section 10 — Street Cross Sections. This illustration provides a general detailed description of how the landscaping, and pedestrian pathway will work in conjunction with the drainage through the pocket park areas. A more detailed design of the area will be provided as part of the plan and specification review process. 21. The applicant shall have Fischer & Associates work with Design Review Board landscape architect, Dick Pohl in the coordination and choice of tree and plant species. Response: Fischer & Associates met with Dick Pohl to coordinate tree and plant species during the preparation of the Valley West Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan. Dick Pohl's comments and suggestion were incorporated into preliminary.plan. 22. That the Covenants under Article VI, Alleys, shall contain the language as • follows (underline added): "Unless prevented by a utility easement or Page 5 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOGS\FPLAT-PHASEI A\PUDCond!Uons.doc • garage access, the owner shall plant a minimum of one deciduous tree for each lot smaller than 60 feet, two deciduous trees for each lot larger than 60 feet, near the alley". Response: The revised Covenants contain,the language required by this condition. (Article VI; Section 4) 23. Within the Covenants, there shall be discussion on dog kennels or runs as to where they are allowed and of what type of material. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article IV; Section 11) 24. Within the Covenants, Article IV, Section 9 (Yards), there shall be wording regarding the maintenance and upkeep of fences. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article IV; Section 11) 25. Within the Covenants, Article V, Site Design, maximum building heights according to ridge heights and roof pitches, shall be noted for each lot type I - IV. • Response: The revised Covenants contain the language specifying maximum ridge heights. Roof pitches are also specified but do not affect the ridge heights. (Article V; Section 1) 26. It shall be noted in the Final PUD plan, that the 20' alleys shall be constructed with 14 feet of asphalt. Response: The Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan is modified to show that 20' alleys to be constructed with 14 feet of asphalt. The exhibit entitled "Valley West Subdivision Alley Sections" located in the Streets and Roads Section (Section 29) is modified to show the revision. The "Valley West Subdivision Internal Access Roads" exhibit, also located in the Streets and Roads Section is also modified. 27. In shall be noted within the Covenants that a maximum of 30% of the lots on each block will be allowed vehicle access form the street. Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this condition. (Article V; Section 1) 28. The proposed uses within the Westlake Business Lot area shall be limited to those allowed under B-1 zoning. • Page 6 of 19 H:\33B4\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondifions.doc Response: The revised Covenants contain the language required by this • condition. (Article V; Section 4) 29. It shall be noted within the Covenants and specifically in Article X, Section 2, that the active parks and larger park area, including the surrounding sidewalks, will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association during the US Army Corps of Engineers required wetland monitoring period (seven years), and will be transferred to the City of Bozeman thereafter. Response: The revised Covenants contain the'language required by this condition. (Article X; Section 2) 30. It shall be noted within the Open Space Plan, more precisely where the playground equipment and picnic areas are to the located. Details of type of playground equipment, including material shall be included with the Final PUD plan submittal. Response: The Open Space Plan has been modified to better describe and illustrate where playground equipment and picnic areas are to be located. (Section 9) 31. To the best of their ability, the subdivider shall require all construction • related traffic associated with the further development of the Valley West subdivision to be routed to and from the site via Huffine Lane;-east of Ferguson Avenue, and to not utilize West Babcock Street or Durston Road east of Ferguson Avenue. Response: The following note will be included on construction plans and specifications for construction within the Valley West Planned Unit Development. Construction related traffic shall be routed to and from the project site via Huffine Lane east of Ferguson Avenue and not utilize West Babcock Street or Durston Road east of Ferguson Avenue. 32. Due to anticipated higher traffic volumes and parking demand adjacent to Bronken Park, the applicant shall install 35' back of curb to back of curb street width for proposed Martin Street. All other street widths shall be 31" or 33" as originally proposed. Response: The Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan is modified to show a 35' back of curb to back of curb street width for the proposed Martin Street adjacent to Bronken Park. The "Valley West Subdivision Internal Access Roads" exhibit located in the Streets and Roads Section (Section 29) is modified to illustrate the revision. Page 7 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondibons.doc • 33. That the garage/alley lighting be restricted to a maximum lumen to be determined in conjunction with the Planning Department. Response: The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development is modified to restrict garage/alley lighting to a maximum lumen, two (2) 60watt bulbs. (Article IV; Section 9) 34. All residential lighting (non-street lighting) shall be illuminated with lights that meet the City's standard requirements. In addition, all outdoor residential lighting.shall be free of glare., and shall be fully shielded or shall be indirect lighting. No lighting shall be beyond a property's lot line. No unshielded lights shall be permitted. No mercury vapor lights shall be permitted. Covenants of the development shall reflect these restrictions. For purposes of this paragraph, the following definitions shall apply: a) Fully shielded lights: Outdoor residential light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no light rays are emitted by the installed fixture at angles above the horizontal plane as certified by a photometric test expert. b) Indirect light: Direct light that has been reflected or has scattered off of other surfaces; c) Glare: Light emitting from a luminary with an intensity great • enough to reduce a viewer's ability to see, and in extreme cases, causing momentary blindness; and d) Outdoor lighting: The nighttime illumination of an outside area or object by any man-made device located outdoors. that produces light by any means. Response: The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 have been modified to include the terms of this condition. (Article IV; Section 10) Engineering: 35. Proposed phasing shall be depicted on the final plan. The full extent of all proposed infrastructure improvements required for each phase shall also be clearly indicated on the final plan submittal. No building permits shall be issued prior to submittal completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533. Phases shall be numbered in the order in which they are to be built. • Response: The proposed phasing for the Valley West Planned Unit Development is provided in Section 7 — Project Schedule. The Phases in Page 8 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASEI A\PUDConditions.doc a • • the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan are modified to illustrate the order in which the Applicant intends to build the development. The Applicant will retain the flexibility to slightly modify the phase boundaries and order of the phased development to account for future housing demands or financial considerations. Modifications to the phase boundaries or order of phased development will be subject to review by the Planning Department and Engineering Department as part of the pre- application submittals for future subdivision of the property. Additional exhibits illustrating infrastructure improvements required for each phase are added for to Section 7 — Project Schedule of the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan. The Applicant intends to utilize the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533 to obtain building permits for concurrent construction of infrastructure and dwelling units. 36. The specific conditions of approval for the lift station proposed for Phase 5 will be provided at the time of infrastructure plan and specification review for the phase. The covenants of the PUD shall be amended to include a statement that advises property owners dependant on the lift station for service that they will be subject to a monthly surcharge to cover the costs • of operation and maintenance of the lift station. The applicant shall sign a waiver of right to protest creation of an SID to construct and maintain a future, regional lift station. Response: A sanitary sewer lift station is proposed to serve phases 7 and 8. Conventional gravity sanitary sewer collection mains will serve phase 5. The revised Covenants include the following statement under Article III — Annual and Special Assessments. A sanitary sewer lift station will be necessary to serve the properties located to the west of Bronken Park (Phases 7 and 8). Property owners dependant on a lift station for sanitary sewer service by the City of Bozeman will be subject to a monthly surcharge to cover the costs of operation and maintenance of the lifts station. A waiver of right to protest creation of an SID to construct and maintain a future regional lift station has been filed for the properties located in Phase 7 and 8 of the Valley West Planned Unit Development. The Applicant will provide a waiver of right to protest the creation of an SID to construct and maintain a future, regional lift station as these phases are developed. • Page 9 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDConditions.doc 37. A detailed Traffic Study Report for the P.U.D. has been provided to the City Engineer. While some specific comments regarding the analysis have been provided by the City Engineer to the developer's engineer, City Engineering staff are comfortable that development of Phase 1 may take place without adversely affecting the local street network. However, considering the degree of development currently occurring along both the Babcock Street and Durston Road corridors and given that the City is already actively pursuing improvements to both of those roadways, it may be necessary to update the traffic study as part of the preliminary plat submittal for each phase subsequent to Phase 1. The need for any traffic impact analysis updates will be identified at the time of pre-application plan submittal for each subsequent phase. Response: Each subsequent phase of the subdivision will be subject to preliminary plat and final plat review and approval. The requirements and need of any traffic impact analysis updates will be identified during the pre- application plan review for subsequent phases. 38. All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of- way and provisions for bicyclist shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and • specification review and approval process. While the typical section and calming strategies included in this submittal provide and acceptable general framework for the development, detailed review and approval of street, sidewalk and associated storm drainage infrastructure will be part of the plan and specification review process for each phase. Response: The typical street sections provided in the Valley West Planned Unit Development submittal are in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update. The traffic calming strategies also incorporate recommendations of this transportation plan. Detailed review and approval of the specific street, sidewalk and associated storm drainage infrastructure will be part of the plan and specification review process for each phase. 39. Prior to filing the final PUD plan for each phase, the applicant shall reconfirm or verify with the County GIS Department, County Road and Bridge Department, and City Engineering that all proposed names are acceptable in order to avoid duplication of names countywide, which may occur between preliminary approval of PUD and filing of final plan for a particular phase. • Response: Road names for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A are modified as illustrated on the Final Plat. The revised street names have Page 10 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASEIA\PUDCondibons.doc • been confirmed with the County GIS Department, County Road and Bridge Department, and City Engineer to be acceptable. The Applicant will reconfirm or verify with the County GIS Department, County Road and Bridge Department and City Engineering that all proposed street names are acceptable prior to filing the final PUD plan for each phase. 40. No direct access from single family or duplex lots to Durston Road, Ferguson Avenue or West Babcock Street will be approved. Response: The Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat includes and 1 foot vehicular no access easement for single family and duplex lots fronting West Babcock Street. Subsequent plats fronting Durston Road, Ferguson Avenue and West Babcock Street will contain similar language. 41. Detailed review and approval of the concurrent construction plans will be part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. Building permits may not be issued until each plan is approved. • Response: The Concurrent Construction Plan for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A is included with the Final Plat Submittal for that phase. The Improvements Agreement and financial guarantee for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A infrastructure are included in Section 19 of this Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat Submittal. The Concurrent Construction Plan for Phase #1A was reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Department. A similar process will be followed for future submittals. PUD Plan Specific Conditions: Planning: 42. That the applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modification to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Response: The Applicant is submitting seven (7) copies of the Valley West Planned Unit Development Final Plan. An extension to the 6-month time frame was requested from and approved by the Planning Director extending the submittal date to November 25, 2002. All of the conditions, corrections and modifications will be incorporated into the final PUD for review and approval of the Planning Director. • Page 11 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDConditons.doc i • 43. That the applicants shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final PUD Plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of the Agreement. Response: The Applicant will enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of on-site improvements as necessary to meet the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations for platting. The Improvements Agreement will be provided at the time of Final Plat submittal for each particular phase of the P.U.D. to guarantee the installation of on-site improvements that have not been installed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. 44. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533, and all requirements of all those ordinances have been met. Response: The Applicant intends to utilize the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533 to obtain building permits prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure • improvements. The Concurrent Construction Plan utilized for Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A is included under Section 30 of that final plat submittal. A similar process is proposed for future phases where the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533 will be utilized. 45. If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half time the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less that twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Response: Occupancy of structures is not planned until all the on-site improvements required to serve the occupied structure are in place. An Improvements Agreement and financial security is included in Section 19 of the Final Plat Application for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A to guarantee the installation of on-site improvements needed to serve those lots. A similar process is proposed for future phases where the provisions • of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533 will be utilized. Page 12 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondifions.doc • 46. That the applicant upon submitting the Final PUD Plan for approval by the Planning Director and prior to issuance of a building permit, will also submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval have been satisfied or met. Response: This narrative to be included with the Final Plan outlines how each of the conditions of approval are or will be satisfied. 47. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing.by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. Response: All special conditions and code provisions will be recorded with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office with the filing of the final plat for each phase of the subdivision. 48. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. • Response: No conditional uses are proposed with the Valley West Subdivision — Phase#1. Conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use for future phases shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns as they pertain to the conditional use approved by the City of Bozeman. Engineering: 49. A stormwater Master Plan for the P.U.D. for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff form the private and public streets and all lots has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general storm drainage and grading concept has been reviewed, the submittal data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. Detailed review of the final grading plan and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review • process for each phase. Page 13 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDConditions.doc • Response: A detailed final grading and drainage plan has been provided to the City Engineer as .part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1, including Phase #1A. The detailed drainage report for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 has been reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman Engineering Department as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. A similar process will be followed for review and approval of the grading and drainage for future phases. 50. A comprehensive utilities design report for water and sewer main extensions, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana has been provided to the City Engineer. The applicant is advised that although the general utilities design concept has been reviewed, the submitted data will be subject to further review as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. Two general comments on the report may be useful at this time: • a) The layout of water mains provided does not indicate the location of PRV's which, given the network proposed, will be required. b) The hydraulic analysis modeled fire flows based on a demand of 1,500 gallons per minute. The applicant is advised that depending on the use in the 131 zoned areas, this may not be adequate. Response: Detailed water and sewer design reports and plans and specifications have been submitted to and approved by the City of Bozeman Engineering Department for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1, including Phase #1A. A similar process will be followed for review and approval of the utility plans for future phases. With respect to the general comments provided the Applicant provides the following: Comment a) The water plans and specifications for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 were modified in cooperation with the City Engineering Department to eliminate the need for additional PRV's. The Valley West Subdivision Existing and Proposed Water Facilities Exhibit included the Water Supply section (Section 26) has been changed to • illustrate the modifications. Page 14 of 19 H:\3364\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondifions.doc • Comment b) Depending on the use in the B1 zoned area, structures may be required to have fire suppression sprinkler systems. With the sprinkler systems the 1,500 gpm demand will be adequate. 51. All water main extensions of more that 500 feet required for any phase of the development shall be fully looped. Water and sewer mains shall be extended to the property lines to adequately accommodate future extensions and/or looping. Response: There are no dead end mains exceeding 500 feet. Water and sewer mains to provide future extensions into the subdivision are extended to subdivision boundaries to accommodate the future extensions. 52. Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions for each proposed phase, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Sewer and Water plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and • a preconstruction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under the provisions of Mutual Ordinances#1532 and #1533. Response: Detailed water and sewer design reports were submitted to the City of Bozeman on January 30, 2002 and approved on February 21, 2002. Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extension associated with the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 were prepared and signed by Greg Stratton, P.E., and submitted to and approved by the City of Bozeman Engineering Department on 3-26-02 and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality on 4-16-02. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. will continue, through its contract with Bozeman Lakes, L.L.C, to provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. A preconstruction conference was conducted on 4-4-02 with City of Bozeman representatives. • Page 15 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondibons.doc • The applicant is pursuing concurrent construction of infrastructure and dwelling units under the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533. The requirements of the ordinances are met in other sections of this Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat submittal The water and sewer improvements necessary to serve the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A are included in the Improvements Agreement provided in Section 19 of this submittal. The cost of these improvements is included in the financial guarantee provided in Section 19 of this submittal. A similar process will be followed for review and approval of the water and sewer facilities for future phases. 53. Plans and Specifications for streets and storm drainage facilities for each phase, prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted. • Response: Plans and Specifications for street and storm drainage facilities were prepared and signed by Greg Stratton, P.E., and submitted to and approved by the City of Bozeman Engineering Department on 5-1-02. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. will continue, through its contract with Bozeman Lakes, L.L.C, to provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. The applicant is pursuing concurrent construction of infrastructure and dwelling units .under the provisions of Municipal Ordinances #1532 and 1533. The requirements of the ordinances are met in other sections of this Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat submittal. The street and storm drainage improvements associated with the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A are included in the Improvements Agreement provided in Section 19 of this submittal. The cost of these improvements is included in the financial guarantee provided in Section 19 of this submittal. A similar process will be followed for review and approval of streets and • storm drainage facilities for future phases. Page 16 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASEIA\PUDCondifions.doc ! • • 54. The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contracted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained. Response: Correspondence with the Montana Department of Fish Wildlife & Parks is included in Section 40 of the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat submittal. A comment letter to City of Bozeman Planning Department is also included. The letter does not raise concerns regarding the affect of the development on the wildlife or habitat. It does state, "in general the development takes admirable steps in protecting waterways and mitigating wetlands." Correspondence with the SCS is included in Section 40 of the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat submittal. As of the date of this submittal, no response has been received. Correspondence with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality includes the Municipal Facilities Exclusion, water and sewer infrastructure plan review and approval, and the application and receipt of the Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Authorization to Discharge Under the General Permit for Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. Copies of the above correspondence are included in Section 40 of the • Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat submittal. Correspondence with the Army Corps of Engineer's has been ongoing since the inception of this project. Copies of the latest correspondence specific to the Valley West Planned Unit Development and Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 are included in Section 40 of the Valley West Subdivision — Phase#1A Final Plat submittal. A 404 permit is in place for the Valley West Planned Unit Development. Mitigation efforts are underway and will be ongoing over the 7 years. A 310 permit will not be required for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1, as no work is proposed within a stream channel. The Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Authorization to Discharge Under the General Permit for Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity is included in Section 40 of the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1A Final Plat submittal. 55. Design of all water and sanitary sewer infrastructure must include provisions for development beyond the scope of this project. • Page 17 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDCondifions.doc • Response: Design of all water and sanitary sewer infrastructure will consider provisions for development beyond the scope of this project. The specific needs will be determined during the design stages of each phase. At a minimum water and sewer lines will be extended to subdivision boundaries to provide for future expansion of the system. 56. Plans and specifications for the entire project'must be provided to the City for review and approval. Response: Infrastructure plans and specifications for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1, including Phase #1A have been submitted to and approved by the City of Bozeman Engineering Department. Plans and specifications for all improvements within the Valley West Planned Unit Development will be provided to the City for review and approval as each phase develops. 57. All major and minor commercial site plans within the Valley West Planned Unit Development will be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Board, in addition to normal agency review. Response: The Applicant agrees to this condition. 58. Within the Covenants, Article V, Site Design, the yard setbacks shall be • noted for each lot type I-IV. The setbacks for residential lots fronting the parkways along Durston Road, Ferguson Avenue, and Babcock Street shall be 15' front yard setbacks with an allowable 5' permitted encroachment; all other residential lots shall have a 20' front yard setback with an allowable 5' permitted encroachment. Response: The revised Covenants provide the information required by this condition. (Article V; Section 1) 59. Applicant shall increase the range of color choices within the color palette . for residential lots, subject to review and approval by the Valley West Architectural Review Committee. Response: The revised Covenants provide and increased color selection for residential lots. (Article IV; Section 7) 60. With the filing of the Final Plat and Final Plan for each phase, the applicant shall submit a master plan for the open space/park areas contained within that phase that defines the major uses of the open space/park areas and a plan for orderly development and preservation of these areas. This master plan shall include a long-term maintenance plan • and maintenance schedule for any mowing, fertilizing, irrigation, weed control, and snow removal. Page 18 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASEI A\PUDConditions:doc • Response: The master plan for the open space/park areas contained within the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 will be submitted with the Final Plat submittal for that subdivision. _The plan defines major uses of the park areas, a plan for orderly development and preservation of these areas, and include a long-term maintenance plan and maintenance schedule for mowing, fertilization, irrigation, weed control, and snow removal. A similar process will be followed for future phases. Page 19 of 19 H:\3384\006\DOCS\FPLAT-PHASElA\PUDConditions.doc • ti • t�K ^• APPLICANTS APPLICANT: Bozeman Lakes, L.L.C. c/o Doug Oberg 2415 E. Camelback, Suite 900 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 DEVELOPER: Aspen Enterprises, L.L.C. c/o Doug Oberg 2415 E. Camelback, Suite 900 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 ARCHITECTURE & LAND PLANNING: Prugh & Lenon Architects c/o Dick Prugh 27 East Main Bozeman, Montana 59715 ENGINEER: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. . c/o Greg Stratton 901 Technology Blvd. Bozeman, Montana 59718 WETLANDS: Vaughn Environmental Services c/o Barbara Vaughn 8353 Saddle Mountain Road Bozeman, Montana 59715 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Fischer& Associates C/o Sandy Fischer 2815 Montana Avenue Billings, Montana 59101 • • • � z • • Valley West Subdivision PUD - Legal Description A Tract of land located in the NE 1/4, and SE 1/4 Section 9; NW 1/4 and a portion of the W1/2 SW 1/4 Section 10, Township 2 South, Range 5 East P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 9 and the True Point of Beginning; Thence along the North.line of said section, S 89047'04" W a distance of 2643.78 feet to a point on the North line of said Section 9 and also being the North Quarter corner of said Section; Thence continuing along said Section, S 88004"24" W a distance of 1337.30 feet to the west one-sixteenth corner of Sections 4 and.9, and the Northeast corner of Certificate of Survey 1581 Tract 1; Thence along the East line of Certificate of Survey #1581 and the west one- sixteenth line of Section 9, S 00059'07"E a distance of 1341.86 feet to the Northwest one-sixteenth corner of Section 9 and a Point being the Southeast corner of Certificate of Survey#1581 Tract 2; Thence along the northerly one-sixteenth line of Section 9, N 88028'22" E a distance of 1337.16 feet to the Center-North one-sixteenth corner of Section 9; Thence continuing along the Northerly one-sixteenth line of N 89019'43" E a • distance of 1320.65 feet to the Northeast one-sixteenth corner of said section; Thence along the easterly one-sixteenth line, S 01002'11" W a distance of 1340.70 feet to the Center-east one-sixteenth corner of Section 9; Thence along the East-west mid-section line, N 88052'19" E a distance of 1319.50 feet to the East Quarter corner of said Section 9 and the northwest corner of Certificate Of Survey#1846 Tract 1; Thence along the East-west mid-section of Section 10, S 89051'58" E a distance of 2668.01 feet to the Center Quarter and the northeast corner of Certificate of Survey# 1872 Tract A; Thence along the north-south mid-section line of Section 10, N 00028'03" E a distance of 2665.84 feet to the North Quarter corner; Thence along the north line of Section 10' N 89059'25" W a distance of 738.56 feet to a point on the north line of Section 10 also being the northeast corner of Certificate of Survey# 1829 Parcel B; Thence along the east-line of said Survey through the following courses, S 00010'31" E a distance of 881.78 feet to the Southeast corner of said Survey; Thence along the south line, S 88030'24" W a distance of 639.06 feet to the Southwest corner of said Survey; Thence along the west line, N 00009'34" E a distance of 898.54 feet to a point on the north line of Section 10 and also being the northwest corner of Certificate of Survey#1829 Parcel B; • Thence along the north line of Section 10, N 89059'25" W a distance of 621.40 feet to a point on the north line of Section 10 and also being the northeast corner • of Certificate of Survey 985 Tract 1; Thence along the east line of said survey through the following courses, S 01°06'08" W a distance of 408.00 feet to a point being the Southeast corner of Certificate of Survey 985 Tract 1; Thence along the South line of said Survey, N 89059'25" W a distance of 600.00 feet to the Southwest corner of said survey; Thence along the west-line, N 01 006'08" E a distance of 408.00 feet to a point on the north line of Section 10 and also being Northwest corner of Certificate of Survey# 985 Tract 1; Thence along the north line of Section 10, N 89059'25"W a distance of 45.01 feet . to the True Point of Beginning. • • • 3 CERTIFICATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST GREG STRATTON, P.E., MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., FOR ASPEN ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., APPLICANT OF THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ATTACHED NAME AND ADDRESS LIST OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS OF RECORD AND EACH PURCHASER UNDER CONTRACT FOR DEED OF PROPERTY (SINCE JANUARY 1, 1990) ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST OF NAMES FROM THE GALLATIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER RECORDS AND MAILING ADDRESSES FROM THE GALLATIN COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDS. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT AN INACCURATE LIST MAY DELAY REVIEW OF THE • PROJECT. l� --`le, SIGNAT RE DATE • i • • Valley West Adjacent Owners Godfrey ORear&Doris O'Rear Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 1 I I I E Granite Ave.#2 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 2 1627 W.Main Street#370 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 RS Bearrow Construction,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 3 420 Mountain Lion Trail T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Promisco Construction,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 4 P.O.Box 6342 T2S R5E; Bozeman,MT 59718 Cartwright Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 5 103 Michael Grove Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Andy Nichols Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 6 P.O.Box 10534 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59719 Jeffrey M.Dakin&Tami L.Dakin Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 7 15230 Low Bench Road T2S R5E Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730 Greer Construction,Limited Ferguson Meadows Block A Lot 8 513 N.23rd Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Daniel L.Crowell Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 1. • Angelina M.Crowell T2S R5E 512 Mineral Ave. Bozeman,MT 59718 Lora L.Wambolt Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 2 1139 S.Cedarview Dr. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Greer Construction,Limited Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 3 513 N.23rd T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Kevin L. Schlender Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 4 225 Two Bear Way T2S R5E Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730 Justin L.Houser Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 5 420 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Virgil Hobbs&Jennifer Hobbs Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 6 416 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Kathy J.Whaley&Ronald L.Whaley Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 7 412 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Promisco Construction,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 8 P.O.Box 6342 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59771-6342 Anders Lewendal Construction Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 9 4314 Graf Street T2S R5E • Bozeman,MT 59715 Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 10 1627 W.Main Street T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 1 • i Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 11 1627 W.Main Street T2S R5E • Bozeman,MT 59715 Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 12 1627 W.Main Street T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Voss Bowman Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 13 115 Candlelight Dr. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Bradley M.Amundson Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 14 211 E.Granite#D T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Dan Mott Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 15 920 Kodiak Place T2S R5E -Belgrade,MT 59714 Dan Mott Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 16 920 Kodiak Place T2S R5E -Belgrade,MT 59714 Kevin Schlender Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 17 225 Two Bear Way T2S R5E Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730 Robert D.Collins Ferguson Meadows Block B Lot 18 Vikki L.Collins T2S R5E 401 Sanders Avenue Bozeman,MT 59718 Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 1 1627 W.Main Street#370 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 • Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 2 1627 W.Main Street#370 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 3 1627 W.Main Street#370 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Devine Design,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 4 2000 Hillside Lane T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Audrey J.Adams Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 5 424 Sanders Avenue T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Ira William Slingsby Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 6 Brenda Gail Slingsby T2S R5E 35 Border Lane Bozeman,MT 59718 . Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 7 1627 W.Main Street#370 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Mahar Montana Homes,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 8 1627 W.Main Street#370 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Joseph A.Smith Ferguson Meadows Block C Lot 9 Laura L.Smith T2S R5E 5425 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman,MT 59715 • Erin Walden Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 1 323 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 2 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 2 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 William R.Hookey Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 3 Patricia M.Hookey T2S R5E 6912 Mogollon Dr. Bozeman;MT 59715 Jeffrey P.C. Schultz Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 4 Monica Ella Torres T2S R5E 311 Mineral Ave. Bozeman,MT 59718 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 5 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E, Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 Mary Susan Johnson Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 6 303 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Upton Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 7 6908 Mogollon Drive' T2S R5E Bozeman.,MT 59715 Breeman N.Ainsworth,Jr. Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 8 Snow W.Ainsworth T2S R5E 217 Mineral Ave. Bozeman,MT 59718 Edward Waddell&Lisa Waddell Ferguson Meadows Block D Lot 9 101 Michael Grove T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Tyll K.Hertsens&Veronica L.Hertsens Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 1 1434 Ash Drive T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Steven L.Buckner Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 2 53 Ridder Lane T2S R5E Whitehall,MT 59759 Cascade Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 3 1627 W.Main#223 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Darcy J.Cape Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 4 301 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Deborah L.Angelly&David Angelly Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 5 306 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Phillip L.Perkins&Debra S.Perkins Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot,6 595 House Street T2S R5E Yellowstone Park,WY 82190 Kevin L.Schlender Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 7 225 Two Bear Way T2S R5E Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730 Thomas Moore&Tara T.Moore Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 8 216 Mineral Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Jesse W.Asher&Stacey Ann Asher Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 9 1703 W. Olive#5 T2S R5E • Bozeman,MT 59715 James Robert Snell&Cathy Lee Snell Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 10 321 Sanders Ave. . T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 3- Lunaria Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 11 P.O.Box 6780 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59771 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 12 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 Voss Bowman Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 13 115 Candlelight Dr. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Michael J.Andriolo Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 14 April C.Andriolo T2S R5E 109 E.McIntosh Court Bozeman,MT 59715 Keith Albrecht Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 15 P.O.Box 261 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59771 John K.Jennaway Ferguson Meadows Block E Lot 16 Stacy D.Jennaway T2S R5E 305 Prairie Ave. Bozeman,MT 59718 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 1 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 2 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The.Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 3 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 Anders Lewendal Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 4 4313 Graf St. T2S 5E Bozeman,MT 59715 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 5 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 6 P.O.Box 160165 T2S RSE -Big Sky,MT 59116-0165 Anders Lewendal Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 7 3101 Buttercup Lane T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Anders Lewendal Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 8 3101 Buttercup Lane T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block F Lot 9 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 Cascade Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 1 1627 W.Main#223 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Tyler E.Haffner Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 2 Janet Haffner-Lynn T2S R5E NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE Cascade Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 3 • 1627 W.Main#223 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 4 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 4 • P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 5 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows . Block G Lot 6 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 7 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 8 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 9 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block G Lot 10 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E -Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 Cascade Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 1 1627 W.Main#223 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Cascade Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 2 1627 W.Main#223 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 • Cascade Homes,Inc. Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 3 1627 W.Main#223 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 4 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 5 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 6 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 7 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 8 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows 'Block H Lot 9 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows_ Block H Lot 10 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 11 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E • Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 12 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 5 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 13 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E • Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 14 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC . Ferguson Meadows Block'H Lot 15 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 16 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 17 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block H Lot 18 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 1 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block-I Lot 2 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 3 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC' Ferguson Meadows . Block I Lot 4 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 5 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 6 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 7 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 8 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block I Lot 9 P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 The Vector Group,LLC Ferguson Meadows Block J Condominium Lot P.O.Box 160165 T2S R5E Big Sky,MT 59716-0165 Lucinda L.Goode Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt. 1 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 1 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E Norma Ardesson&Sydney Ardesson Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2400 W.Durston Rd.Apt 17 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 2 Bozeman,MT 59718-1840 T2S R5E • Randy L.Jackson&Debra K.Jackson Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.3 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 3 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E 6 - Eric P.Reier Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 • 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.4 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 4 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E Charles C.Edgmond Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Mary Haglund Edgmond Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 5 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.5 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718=6313 Leo K.Durham&Betty Durham Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt. 6 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 6 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E Dawna R.Demaere&Jodi Demaere Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.7 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 7 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E Katy Fitzgerald Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Myles K.Fitzgerald Aspen Place.Condominium,Unit 8 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt. 8 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718-6312 David L.Cole Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St. Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 9 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E Donald M.Hartle&Penny R.Hartle Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 14225 Kelly Canyon Rd. Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 10 Bozeman,MT 59715-8205 T2S R5E Ruth W.Thornberg Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt. 11 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 11 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E John N.Vogan&Jennifer L.Vogan Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 • 220 Willimas Rd E Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 12 Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730-9760 T2S R5E Daniel W.Bingen&Judith A.Bingen Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 13 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 13 Bozeman,MT 59715-6313 T2S R5E Orville L.Erlenbusch Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Robyn L.Erlenbusch Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 14 10 Lariat Loop T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715-9222 N.Glen Crane&Linda L.Crane Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 15 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 15 Bozeman,MT 59718-6313 T2S R5E LeClair Three,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 1613 Durston Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 16 Bozeman,MT 59715 T2S R5E Robert C.Collins III &Natha K. Collins Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 17 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 17 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E William A.Kolwyck&Joyce B.Kolwyck Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 18 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 18 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Vonna L.Uithoven Minor Sub. 261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 19 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 19 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Darlene Y.Haines Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 20 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 20 • Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Bonnie Murphy Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 21 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 21 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E 7 Keith A. Goodman Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Elizabeth D.Goodman Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 22 • P.O.Box 305 T2S R5E Twin Bridges,MT 59754-0305 Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 23 Bozeman,MT.59718 T2S R5E Tim D.Dreier&Shelly L.Dreier Minor Sub.261 Block 3. Lot 1 . 316 N.23rd Ave. Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 24 Bozeman,MT 59718-3100 T2S R5E James M.Hanrahan Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Susan M.Hanrahan Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 25 166 McGee Dr. T2S R5E. Bozeman,MT 59715-8094 Judith H.Townes&Kristin E.Thomas Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.26 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 26 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Jan Kankrlik&Margaret L.Kankrlik Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.27 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 27 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Gerd J.Callant Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.28 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 28 . Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Ernest Klatt&Shirley Klatt Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.29 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 29 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Charlotte M.Holzworth Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.30 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 30 • Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E Robert LaFountain&Patricia Hiner Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.31 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 31 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 T2S R5E W.J.Higgs&Mary M.Higgs Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.32 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 32 Bozeman,MT 59718-6314 - T2S R5E Catherine Ann Maclean Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.33 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 33 Bozeman,MT 59718-6315 T2S R5E Richard K.Lindquist Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Linda K.Lindquist Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 34 1594 Sunsey Lane T2S R5E Wooster,OH 44691-1824 James H.Simons Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.35 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 35 Bozeman,MT 59718-6315 T2S R5E Sally C.Newton Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.36 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 36 Bozeman,MT 59718-6312 T2S R5E Robert E.Gregory Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.37 Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 37 Bozeman,MT 59718-6315 T2S R5E Larry L.Walter&Jessie M.Walter Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 3039 Atherton Lane Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 38 Butte,MT 59701-3803 T2S R5E • Guy N.Graham&Barbara.L.Graham Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 10010 Pine Butte Rd. Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 39 Bozeman,MT 59718-7500 T2S R5E 8 Thomas Starner Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 • Kelly Ann Starner Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 40 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt.40 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718-6315 William Groepper Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Esther C.Groepper Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 41 601 N.Willson Ave. T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 42 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E SBL Enterprises,LP Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 700 Dell Place Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 43 Bozeman,MT 59715 T2S R5E Laney C.Woodward Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 Nancy Woodaward Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 44 4050 W.Babcock St.Apt 44 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 45 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 46 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Bay Park Properties Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2937 Woodland Ct. Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 47 Aroata,CA 95521 T2S R5E . Bay Park Properties Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 • 2937 Woodland Ct. Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 48 Aroata,CA 95521 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 49 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 50 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 51 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 52 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 53 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 54 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot i 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 55 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 56 • Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 57 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E 9 Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 58 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inca Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 59 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 60 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 61 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 62 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 63 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Crescent Valley Condominium,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 3 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Aspen Place Condominium,Unit 64 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Ken LeClair Minor Sub.261 Block 2 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard - T2S R5E Bozeman,'MT 59718-5852 Debra V.Naccarto Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 c/o At Home Solutions Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 1 682 Ferguson Road Stop 1 T2S R5E Bozeman;MT 59718-6491 • Debra V.Naccarto Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 c/o At Home Solutions Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 2 682 Ferguson Road Stop 1 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718-6491 Crescent Valley Center,Inc. Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 2421 Highland Boulevard Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 3 Bozeman,MT 59718-5852 T2S R5E Tom G.Olivo&Katherine M.Olivo Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 8012 Lookfar Way Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 4 Bozeman,MT 59715-9323 T2S R5E Double B.Properties,LLC Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 682 Ferguson Road Stop 5 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 5 Bozeman,MT 59718-6491 T2S R5E Joseph P.Deason Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 1805 W.Dickerson St.Ste 1 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 6 Bozeman,MT 59715-4131 T2S R5E Joseph P.Deason Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot i 1805 W.Dickerson St.Ste 1 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 7 Bozeman,MT 59715-4131 T2S R5E Joseph P.Deason Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 1805 W.Dickerson St.Ste 1 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 8 Bozeman,MT 597154131 T2S R5E Jeffrey L.King Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 Molly Siddoway King Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 9 676 Ferguson Road,Unit 3 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718-6492 Evan McCaw&Jill McCaw Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 409 Creekside Drive Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 10 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E 10 - Linda Lennon Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 6790 Teepee Ridge Road Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 11 Bozeman,MT 59715-7677 T2S R5E / Linda Lennon Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 6790 Teepee Ridge Road Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 12 Bozeman,MT 59715-7677 T2S R5E Victor E.Glenn&Bridget Glenn . Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot .1 1531 Rocking Horse Dr. Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 13 Henderson,NV 89015-8817 T2S R5E Michael E.Nicklin Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 670 Ferguson Road,Ste 1 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 14 Bozeman,MT 59718 T2S R5E Donna S.Lovell Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 6745 Cottonwood Road Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 15 Bozeman,MT 59718-9513 T2S R5E Richard J.Andriolo Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 670 Ferguson Road,Ste 3 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 16 Bozeman,MT 59718-6492 T2S R5E Mark E.Theibeault&Diane M.Theibeault Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 14600 Spanish Peaks Trail Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 17 Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730-9602 T2S R5E Mark E.Theibeault&Diane M.Theibeault Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 14600 Spanish Peaks Trail Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 18 Gallatin Gateway,MT 59730-9602 T2S R5E Kenneth L.Rapp&Lomalee T.Rapp Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 P.O.Box 10604 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 19 Bozeman,MT 59719-0604 T2S R5E RM Investments,LLP Minor Sub.261 Block 1 Lot 1 P.O.Box 3087 Pinewood Professional Center Condominium,Unit 20 Bozeman,MT 59772-3087 T2S R5E McDonald Land Company Section 3 T2S R5E 2906 2nd Ave.N. Billings,MT 59101-2026 Douglas Lance Smith Section 3 T2S R5E 4521 W.Durston Road Bozeman,MT 59718-9497 Christ The King Lutheran Church Minor Sub.253 Lot 1 2000 S 3rd Ave. Section 3 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715-6004 Marie C.Baxter Life Estate Section 3 T2S R5E c/o Mrs.Eric Anderson 3610 E.Baxter Lane Bozeman,MT 59718-9794 Peggy H.Metcalf Section 4 T2S R5E 3833 W.Durston Rd. Bozeman,MT 59718-6221 William R.Metcalf&Peggy Metcalf COS 1155 3833 W.Durston Rd. Section 4 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718-6221 Sidney and Ethel M.Dykstra Minor Sub.201 Lot 3 c/o Pedro J.and Olga M.Adrian Section 4 T2S R5E 7800 S.Red Road Ste 124 South Miami,FL 33143-0000 • Sidney and Ethel M.Dykstra Minor Sub.201 Lot 2 c/o Pedro J.and Olga M.Adrian Section 4 T2S R5E 112 Palm Ave. Miami Beach,FL 33139 11 Sidney and Ethel M.Dykstra Minor Sub.201 Lot 1 c/o Pedro J.and Olga M.Adrian Section 4 T2S R5E 7800 S.Red Road Ste 124 South Miami,FL 33143-0000 Richard G.Nollmeyer,Trustee Section 4 T2S R5E 3142 Saint Johns Ave. Billings,MT 59102-6624 Alan D.Fulton- COS 1581 Tract 1 910 Blacktail Loop Section 9 T2S R5E Butte,MT 59701-7110 Alan D.Fulton COS 1581 Tract 2 910 Blacktail Loop Section 9 T2S R5E Butte,MT 59701-7110 Happel Family Trust Section 9 T2S R5E 4700 Gooch Hill Road Bozeman,MT 59718-9027 Norton Ranch,Inc. Section 9 T2S R5E 8459 Huffine Lane Bozeman,.MT 59718 Norton Ranch,Inc. Section 9 T2S R5E . 8459 Huffme Lane Bozeman,MT 59718 360 Ranch Corp. COS 1005 c/o Gerald Wing Section 9 T2S R5E 1240 Bennett Lane Calisto a,CA -94515-9714 R&D Holding COS 1846 Tract 1 306 Sheridan Ave. Section 10 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 WBW,LLC COS 1872 Tract A Delaney&Co. Section 10 T2S R5E 101 E.Main St. Bozeman,MT 597154795 Gallatin Valley Health/Fitness Group,LLC Minor Sub.295 Lot 1 P.O.Box 8190 Section 10 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59773-8190 Ken LeClair Minor Sub.295 Lot 2 2421 Highland Boulevard Section 10 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59718 Michael W.Delaney&Ileana Indreland , Minor Sub.295 Lot 3 101 East Main Section 10 T2S R5E Bozeman,MT 59715 Pierce,Inc: Section 10 T2S R5E c/o Heritage Christian School 4310 W.Durston Road Bozeman,MT 59718 Montana Power Company COS 985 Tract 1 40 E.Broadway Section 10 T2S R5E Butte,MT 59701 H:\3384\003\docs\EACIS\Ad jOwnerList.doc 12 • • a • • • Planning Objectives. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan With the recent adoption of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, this P.U.D. becomes one of the first opportunities to implement the "Vision for the Future" as outlined in Section 1.1 of the plan. In the Introduction Section 2.5, "Bozeman Community Plan Elements the following chapters address specific goals and objectives. Following is a statement regarding how this P.U.D. implements the goals and objectives outlined in the those chapters: Chapter 4 - Community Quality Chapter 5 - Housing Chapter 6 - Land Use Chapter 7 - Economic Development Chapter 8 - Environmental Quality and Hazards Chapter 9 - Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Chapter 10 - Transportation Chapter 11 - Public Facilities and Services Chapter 4- Community Quality • 4.9.1 Community Design - Create a community composed of neighborhoods designed for human scale and compatibility in which services and amenities are convenient, visually pleasing, and properly integrated and designed to encourage walking, cycling, and mass transit use. 4.9.2 Neighborhood Design -New neighborhoods shall be pedestrian oriented, contain a variety of housing types and densities, contain parks and other public spaces, have a commercial center and defined boundaries. This particular goal is the essence of this P.U.D. We have planned residential neighborhoods with various lot sizes and building types. The streets are the width of Bozeman's traditional neighborhood streets with sidewalks and tree planted boulevards. The use of alleys allows service to occur and vehicles to be stored away from the streetscape. The neighborhoods are bordered by collector and arterial streets with "parkways" along their edges for the convenience of pedestrians. Within the neighborhoods are additional parkways, trails; and sidewalks which connect the residences to other residences, parks, and the commercial area. Neighborhood focal points occur in the form of large natural parks. 4.9.3 Design Guidelines - Create illustrated design guidelines to give clear direction in design and review of residential and non-residential neighborhoods without unduly constraining • architectural style and innovation. The Design Guidelines have been developed with the goal of creating • architectural and planning interest through diversity of design. To achieve architectural variation along with quality, the Architect and Builder will be required to be true to the principles of each design style. The Design Guidelines are specific when they pertain to planning issues. 4.9.4 Public Landscaping and Architecture - Enhance the urban appearance and environment through the use of architectural excellence, landscaping, trees and open space, as defined. This P.U.D. has 30% open space which occurs as active recreation, passive parks, pedestrian corridors, parkways, and wetlands. All streets and parks are bordered with trees which in time will create the landscape quality of our traditional neighborhoods. 4.9.5 Urban Forestry - Enhance the urban appearance, environment, air quality and general quality of life through the provision of a healthy urban forest. The P.U.D.'s landscape plan demonstrates the "Urban Forest" which it creates. The landscape schemes vary from natural wetlands to formal tree lined streets. Each residence and commercial development will be required to provide its own landscaping in accordance with the overall landscape plan. 4.9.6 Public Health - Support and promote a holistic approach in protecting community health • by recognizing that health is impacted by personal, social,financial, and environmental factors; such as housing, access to care, transportation and many others. Public health, safety and welfare is of prime importance to all. The conception of this P.U.D. included the. goal of meeting or exceeding all required permits, codes and jurisdictional planning goals. 4.9.7 Arts and Culture - Support public and private arts and cultural opportunities in the community for all persons. It is difficult in a P.U.D. to specifically show how the arts and culture are supported.. Hopefully through good planning and design the overall quality of life including the arts will be enhanced. 4.9.8 Historic Preservation - Protect historically and culturally significant resources that contribute to community identity, history and quality of life. Traditional historic preservation does not apply to this project. There have been two past uses of this property, 1) untouched natural prairie and 2) ditch irrigated farm and ranch land. Due to the location,2 %miles from the center of Bozeman's downtown business district and within the city limits, this • property is ideal for residential and neighborhood commercial use. Planning Objectives -Bozeman 2020 Community Plan -2 - • Chapter S-Housing S.6.1 Housing-promote an adequate supply of safe housing that is diverse in type, density and location with a special emphasis on maintaining neighborhood character and stability. The P.U.D. Master Plan locates three basic housing density patterns: 1. 6-8 units/acre 2. 8-10 units/acre 3. 10-12 units/acre Within this density pattern, lots in Phase 1 differ in size as well as housing type. There are housing types varying from 950 SF to 1250 SF row house condominiums. to 2400 SF single family homes. Also duplexes with four different floor plans and single-family homes with auxiliary apartments are planned. Additionally, the housing styles will vary with the goal of achieving interesting and diversified streetscapes.. Chapter 6-Land Use • 6.6.1 Create a sense of place that varies throughout the city, efficiently provide public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and world and minimize sprawl. A sense of place as discussed in the PBS program narrated by Robert A. M. Stern, discusses traditional planning and architecture that creates a quality environment. Traditional neighborhood development is an example of planning ideas that have historically created quality neighborhoods and communities. There are certain planning principles such as: • mixed density housing • close proximity to commercial and recreation • people places separate from vehicle/service areas 6.62 Centers .- Designate centers for commercial development rather than corridors to encourage cohesive neighborhood development in conjunction with non-motorized transportation options. One primary center for commercial development is planned at the corner of Babcock and Cottonwood. this P.U.D.'s 9 acres along with approximately 9 acres on adjacent property to the south of Babcock will allow for the building of a community commercial center. This corner is accessible from an arterial (Cottonwood), a collector, (Babcock), 4 local streets,2 bike lanes and Planning Objectives - Bozeman 2020 Community Plan - 3 - 2 pedestrian parkways. This area is within '/Z mile radius of the majority of • the P.U.D. Additionally, there is a commercial area shown on Dursto.n Road adjacent to the larger lake. This area is an ideal location for a small local business park with the possibility of services such as restaurants. 6.6.3 City Core -Strengthen the Historic Core of Bozeman to preserve the community character, economic resource, and historical connection represented by this area. At first glance, this seems contradictory to the objective of having commercial areas spread conveniently around and adjacent to new neighborhoods. Hopefully the downtown will continue to provide services that are not appropriate for neighborhood development. This P.U.D. is located relatively close for a new neighborhood of this size. The distance to the city center is 2 % miles. With continued road improvements, this new P.U.D.will be very accessible to our traditional downtown. 6.64 Natural Environment and Aesthetics - Ensure adequate review of individual and cumulative environmental and aesthetic effects of development to preserve the viewsheds, natural functions, and beauty which is a fundamental element of Bozeman's character. The beauty of this particular land is primarily its streams and wetlands. The • stream and wetland enhancement will greatly improve the existing conditions. Additionally building height regulations will allow views of the mountains to remain unobstructed. There are essentially two neighborhoods created by this development. Cottonwood Road is the natural division. Both neighborhoods have stream/wetland corridors that function as their defining element. Also there is mixed density residential and commercial in both neighborhoods. Chapter 7-Economic Development 7.4.1 Promote and encourage the continued development of Bozeman as a vital economic center. 7.4.2 Support balanced policies and programs to encourage a vigorous and diverse economy. As Bozeman continues to grow, it is important that city government direct and support development that enhances economic vitality. This 2020 plan addresses economic development by implementation of the goals, objectives and policies throughout the document. This P.U.D. follows these directives and therefore becomes a part of Bozeman's economic development. Planning Objectives - Bozeman 2020 Community Plan -4 - • Chapter 8-Environmental Quality and Critical Lands 8.14.1 Protect the health, safety and welfare of Bozeman area residents, and protect private and public property. 8.14.2 Identify, protect and enhance natural resources within the planning area, and the important ecological functions these resources provide. 8.14.3 Ensure environmental quality of water resources, air and soils within the planning area. 8.1. 4.4 Maintain a natural and attractive aesthetic character for the Bozeman Area. This P.U.D. includes a major enhancement to the existing low quality wetlands. The wetlands permit with the Army Corps of Engineers.outlines high quality wetland development that will be an enhancement to the natural environment. Riparian corridors, ditches and springs are designed to enhance water quality and wildlife habitat. The engineering of the P.U.D. addresses flood control and drainage quality. The addition of lakes provides recreation opportunities and wildlife enhancement. Another benefit of this wetlands plan is the opportunity for public education through an interpretive trail system that is planned along Baxter Creek. • Chapter 9-Parks,Recreation and Open Spaces 9.9.1 Parks & Recreation - Provide for accessible, desirable, and maintained public parks, active and passive open spaces, trails systems and recreational facilities for residents of the community. This P.U.D. directly meets these goals. The P.U.D. includes a 15-acre soccer complex. The grass fields and irrigation have already been put in place, primarily through community volunteers. 2 recreational lakes with 7 and 3 acres of open water are planned. Parkways border the project. These landscaped parks buffer the residential lots from perimeter arterial and collector streets. Also a comprehensive pedestrian circulation is plan is designed for these parkways, small interior,parks and traditional sidewalks. The parks throughout the project, either active or passive, are very visible and accessible to the public. A trail system is proposed through both parks along the stream corridors. The trails, parkways, and street sidewalks are a continuation of the circulation system outlined in the 2020 Plan in figures 9-1 and the transportation plan map. Planning Objectives -Bozeman 2020 Community Plan - 5 - ( , •Chapter 10- Transportation 10.8.1 Transportation System - Maintain and enhance the functionality of the transportation system. 10.8.2 Ensure that a variety of travel options exist which allow safe, logical, and balanced transportation choices. 10.8.3 Encourage transportation options that reduce resource consumption, increase social interaction, support safe neighborhoods, and increase the ability of the existing transportation facilities to accommodate a growing city. 10.8.4 Pathways - Establish and maintain an integrated system of transportation and recreational pathways, including bicycle and pedestrian trails, neighborhood parks, green belts and open space. This P.U.D. is planned around Bozeman's Master Transportation Plan. Also, bikeways, and trails are provided consistent with Bozeman's 2020 Plan. Within the P.U.D. are local streets and avenues which are consistent with Bozeman's street sections. Traffic calming design is used at street intersection and pedestrian corridors. Pedestrian, bike and vehicle circulation has been integrated into an overall design consistent with the • Transportation Plan and the guidelines found in traditional neighborhood development. Chapter 11 -Public Services and Facilities 11.15.1 Facilities and Services - All public facilities and services provided under the authority of the City of Bozeman shall be provided in an efficient, cost-effective and environmentally sound manner. 11.15.2 The City shall work with other service and utility providers to ensure the adequate and safe provision of services. The engineering of all public services has been developed with the City Engineering and Planning Staff. Utility mains have been engineered to meet future demands in the service area. Private utility providers have included their requirements in this plan. With this size of P.U.D., the opportunity to develop an overall utility plan for the area has been a great benefit. Planning Objectives - Bozeman 2020 Community Plan - 6 - 5 i m 4� 0 i SID • F • C • 3 • m 4 • • Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.100 PUD Design Objectives and Criteria Note: Responses to some of the following design objectives and criteria are found in our responses to the "Planning Objectives of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan". 1. All Development 1. Yes, see 2020 response. 2. . Yes, see engineering response. 3. The project preserves and replaces natural vegetation. The existing quality wetlands and streams have been preserved and enhanced. The low quality wetlands have been mitigated(replaced)with enhanced high quality wetlands. Please see the wetlands section of this application. 4. Yes. The wildlife habitat has been preserved and enhanced. Additionally, lakes will be created that will add to the fisheries system. • 5. N/A. 6. Yes. The large majority of lighting is residential neighborhood street lighting which conforms to Bozeman's requirements. The specific commercial lighting will be addressed in the future phases that have commercial development. 7. Yes, see 2020 response. 8. Yes. 9. Yes,this development is designed with the natural water courses as the central organizing element. 10. Yes,the primary energy saving aspects of this P.U.D. are the accessibility to pedestrian circulation throughout the project. The pedestrian circulation connects residential to recreation and commercial and a future Bozeman school site is 1/3 of a mile away. 11. Yes, one of the major design goals of this P.U.D. is to have the parks and open space accessible to the public. This produces a plan where the residential lots do not adjoin public areas thus creating privacy for the residences. 12. a. Yes, see 2020 response. • b. N/A. c. Yes. The open space is primarily designed for use by the public as well as residents and their guests. 13. Yes. 14. Yes. Please see the pedestrian circulation plan. 15. Yes. See 2020 response. This plan follows into the transportation plan and the trail corridor and boulevard trail plans found in the 2020 Plan. 16. Yes. Please see the Traffic Calming Plan, Landscape Plan and Lighting Design. 17. Yes, see 2020 response. 18. Yes, the landscaping specifically addresses the development of the streetscape, open space and parkway(boulevard)trails. 19.'Yes. Each residential property has specific landscape requirements. 20. Yes. This plan enhances access to all existing and new parks and open spaces. 2. Residential 1. Yes. 2. Yes. 3. Yes. 4. Yes. 5. Yes,the project is within 2,000 feet of: a. a neighborhood service center b. public school (site) c. day care center d. major employment center(minor employment) e. public park 6. Yes. 7. The density proposed in Phase I is consistent with the density of the existing underlying zoning (R-3). We have decreased the front yard setbacks to achieve a more intimate streetscape which is a goal of traditional neighborhood design. • 8. Does not exist. 9. Yes. 10. The neighborhood services proposed in this P.U.D. are located on a minor arterial and principal arterial streets. Traffic through the P.U.D. has been minimized by the street design. 11. Yes. (future phases) 12. Yes. (future phases) 13.No. This project does not promote the.,unique character of the surrounding neighborhoods. • � � s • • r ' � �"� ' h� �t Is . m DO • . T � � D q; � T b L <. �:� ��' . , y.:, � - � � ,.;,� ; � 2 •.tl�N + L 1 • Proiect Schedule This section is a response to the requirements of he City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.080 relative to Phasing of Planned Unit Developments. This application requests approval of the Valley West Subdivision = Phase#1 Preliminary Plat and the Planned Unit Development for the remainder of the approximately 310 acre Valley West Subdivision. Project phases are illustrated on the Valley West Subdivision Preliminary Phase Exhibit. A preliminary schedule is illustrated on the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Project Schedule. Both exhibits are included in this section. The preliminary project schedule identifies the phased schedule for the development along with major offsite improvements necessary as the project develops. Major offsite improvements are traffic related for Durston Road, Cottonwood Road, and the Cottonwood/Huffine Lane intersection. These improvements are phased into the project according to the results of the Traffic Impact Study for the Valley West Planned Unit Development Subdivision. Generally, the development plan calls for construction of one phase per year through 2010. The exception is 2001, during which both Phase 1 and Phase 3 .are scheduled. �7 i Durston Road (Minor Arterial) 41 PRIVATE OWNERSHIP (0 i, �O I-RITAGE CHRISTIAN �Oh -- SCHOOL _ SOCCER A rCb O L W7E: RW 9 I + f Y TO aE nRUNED Toole S- j ` I met ocrzxuwm WIM APlO1MNG Pe0PfI7iY owava IN novae wus¢ ci r LEGEND. Cascade PHASE 1 3 4 5 0 AC ``� ° tt PHASE 2 AC (34.50 ) ��' .THASE 3 (28.00 AC) F-1 � ti PHASE 14 (49.00 AC) — PHASE 5 (22.50 AC �) PHASE 6 21 .00 AC - ' PHASE 7 (31 .00 AC) 1 ¢ ZEo r ,w= West Babcock 0 4\ I { o a° C zc_) Street (Minor Arterial) o PHASE 8 (40.00 AC) W W o w w w v a` .� �,�I 0 pfl � o_ o �o U: U m 3 a (0 �1 i'� c — a> PHASE 9 (14.00 AC) W I W o Q x1 x as PHASE 10 (12.50 AC) m Soccer 16.00 AC Fields B-1 (6.00 AC) �/�� VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION IN ASSOCIAl10N WmI: PRELIMINARY PHASE EXHIBIT ,0"`" �L"otal (3 09.00 AC PRELIMINARY P R U G H gMORRISON MAIERLE,in PHASE EXHIBIT LENON r i�u m imec ai mmm n am•A�«l min ra toD�-� aspen dJENT• N ENTERPRISES enterprises,I.I.C. a= 11/02/01 PLATING DATE: Nov/19/2001 • y7.ees,Mom S/reeR Oomrrtq M7 5g�,g FIELD WORK• DATE: DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:MS H:\33e4\OD3VWAe\MASrBVuN\REcm+at .e" CHECKED BY;GJS PROJ IP3384.0 33 SHEET 1 OF 1 VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE ID Task Name 2002 2003 2004 1 2005 1 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Q4 Q1 Q2 1 03 04 1 Q1 1 02 1 03 1 Q4 I Q1 I Q2 I Q3 1 04 1 01 1 Q2 1 03 1 04 1 Q1 T Q2 Q3 04 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 1 3 1 Q4 I Q1 1 02 1 Q3 I Q4 IQ1 Q2 Q3 D4 1 Phase 1 2 Phase 2 s Phase 3 I 4 n I Cott o wood/Huffine Lane Intersection , 5 Phase 4 6 Phase 5 7 Phase 6 Durst on Road o . t 9 Phase 7 A 10 Phase 8 11 Cottonwood Road 12 Phase 9 13 Phase 10 ; Task ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Milestone ♦ Rolled Up Split External Tasks External Milestone ?roject:Projectl Date:Wed 11/13/02 Split Summary Rolled Up Milestone O Project Summary Deadline r Progress Rolled Up Task Rolled Up Progress External Milestone Page 1 H:\3384\003\13udgets\Projectl , Ank Amok Durston Road mw (Minor Arterial) II II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP I j HERITAGE CHRISTIAN — II r SCHOOL SOCCER FIELDS NOTE: SPECIFIC ROAD LAYOUT IN THIS AREA TO BE DETERMINED II I� WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY IIOWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. 1 II ! ♦f II LEGEND II PHASE BOUNDARY 1 q� y "�' EXISTING SEWER LINE I I— — — EXISTING WATER LINE i PROPOSED SEWER LINE ' I ` PROPOSED WATER LINE � � I , I Q II o-- II > w z West Babcock °O 23 II I0 .2 II 'L Z OR Street (Minor Arterial) a a W ct:c II a I o Imo O u Lv Lu ti O Q I� >_ U i U GOII 3 a_ I �� � 0 n a of 00- II VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 UTILIITES EXHIBIT • IN ASSOCIATION WITH: MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. P R U G H MAIERLE iNc. " L E N O N PHASE I aspen - - - 1 °"""'°"� °�~°°�'"`�' ""`0— ""�°'"" UTILITIES EXHIBIT ♦ • i� CLIEN T:ASPEN ENTERPRISES — - enterprises,I.I.C. K 09/t0/02 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 >7&A Mai.Sm Bornaaa MT 59735 FIELD WORK• DATE: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:NTS DRAWING NAME: H:\3394\003\ACAD\YASTERPLAN\MI-EVEND-PNASE.E.4 CHECKED BY:GJS PROJ 8:3384.OD3 SHEET I OF I Akk NEW Durston Road I (Minor Arterial) I• I I II II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP I HERITAGE CHRISTIAN I II SCHOOL SOCCER FIELDS O8511111111ruffiffli all ) I NOTE: SPECIFIC ROAD I , II LAYOUT IN THIS AREA TO BE DETERMINED Toole Street WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY II OWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. CL I. Z r II I � � I Cascade Street LEGEND PHASE BOUNDARY I L I • — — — — —I - I � — '— � — EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) I PROPOSED SEWER LINE PROPOSED WATER LINE q II � , II - - - - - - - - - ifr 1 � i Q I o II > mo w= West Babcock o p II Of ° II '� Z O Street (Minor Arterial) 0 (U > O— c w W II o Q I ., Imo En v W I- p x II 0 - (n D ° Of I L� Q II �, II U II VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 2 UTILIITES EXHIBIT IN AssoclArlort WITH: __r"- '. 4MORRISON "�'P RUGH M ,INC. � VALLEY WEST SUB. a— R. ,IN PHASE 2 aspen L E N - N A�I„�Iam••A��.Pa.�.:1� n<I ,aI�1 N-..a UTILITIES EXHIBIT � • i CLIENT:ACP[N ENTERPRISES enterprises,I.I.C. tej x PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 a7 Faq Mail Sb 90 wn.MT 59715 FIELD WORK• DATE:09/10/02 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:NTS H;\S3g4\DD3\pCAD\MASTERPl \UTIL-EVEND-PHASEA.9 CHECKED BY GJS PROJ#:33SA.003 SHEET 1 OF 1 Ask Durston Road I (Minor Arterial) Y II II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP HERITAGE CHRISTIAN I II ( SCHOOL SOCCER FIELDS wungign o I I NOTE: SPECIFIC ROAD LAYOUT IN THIS ARFA TO BE DETERMINED - WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY \ OWNERS IN FONRE PHASES. I ---- C LL II I I II i c' - - - - - - �. LEGEND `\ I PHASE BOUNDARY EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) — — — —D4— EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) II ^ I I ® ® PROPOSED SEWER LINE I I I z PROPOSED WATER LINE I � I zzj I � t Q II o r. II w= West Babcock o p II ° II 'L 2Of b CC,- Street (Minor Arterial) o Qaa c W LiW II oQ II I V O Q: D_ x o a o a, 13 m C: I °' W W 0 x x II oa I I VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION f PHASE 3 UTILIITES EXHIBIT IN ASSOCIATION WITH: r ' �MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. P R U G H MAIERLE,INC. �'� PHASE 3 a ..�,-a.m.r� aspen L E N O N A90iTabpBA�+6Nm•uorlwRxani Lbt)aT n UTILITIES EXHIBIT • CLIENT:ASPFN ENTERPRISES enterprises,l.l.c. x PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 s7 East Main rte Stt Boumrm,MT 597T5 FIELD WORK: DATE:09/10/02 TODD SCALE:NTS DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: N:\3384\003\ACAD\MASTERPLM\IfiL-EX7ENO-PKSE.4w9 CHECKED BY:GAS PROJ A:3384.003 SHEET I OF I i lw NEW Durston Rood (Minor Arteriol) I) PRIVATE OWNERSHIP HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SOCCER FIELDS I I r I NOTE*: SPECIFIC ROAD LAYOUT IN THIS AREA lip TO l#DETERMINED I. 'WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY \ OWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. of II �I I i II q � I II I. — it i o li o-, I� > w= West Babcock o { WI' IO p >-O CaOf Street (Minor Arteriol)'p O Bpi W 1IO — LJ a o x II 0o U) �� N ... w w O � � L� m m LEGEND it U a �I PHASE BOUNDARY VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION • f EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) PHASE 4 UTILIITES EXHIBIT • — — — IN ASSOCIATION WITH: j 4MAIERLEjNC. 09— — — — EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) MORRISON �„., VAT..LEY WEST SUB. P RUGH ® a PROPOSED SEWER LINE '""'o— ,",,, ,,,,, PHASE 4 aspen L_E N O N A������.,��.�D.I.,:,�„Ra UTILITIES EXHIBIT � � CLIENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISES enterprises,I.I.C. Iml PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 X `t - -- - FIELD WORK DATE:09/10/02 PROPOSED WATER LINE :7 Fa31 Main SbM Bo:rnmn,MT 59715 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:NTS N:\D]84\0D]\ACAD\MASTERPIAN\UTIL-EVEND-PKSE.dw9 CHECKED BY:GJS PROJ ®:3384.003 SHEET I OF Durston Road I (Minor Arterial) I PRIVATE OWNERSHIP 7,111 HERITAGE CHRISTIAN I i I II SCHOOL SOCCER FIELDS O I NOTE' SPECIFIC ROAD LAYOUT IN THIS AREA TO BE DETERMINED II WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. I I 4 M I II i v I �� - - - - - - — ree I II I ._ I • I j I I \\X I w ° a) West Babcock O of � Street (Minor Arterial) a Y Y 0; II a I � �mO 0 W I W ti O Q > chi chi ¢ I I O O oa v m C ,2- I Q) 0) Q V LY L� I I FW— ~ y 'L m , m LEGEND it u a II ti VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE BOUNDARY • — — — — — — EXISTING,SEWER LINE } PHASE 5 UTILIITES EXHIBIT IN A$$acIATIaN WITH: Do— EXISTING WATER LINE T — t AIMAIERLE,lNc. MORRISONP RU G H VALLEY WEST SUB. ® PROPOSED SEWER LINE '""'— a"' PHASE 5 LENON n s nn fm la.lp Bey Ivev..rt.mri• IbD mane r«Dsl m•nn aspen --�----- - - --- -- -, ILITIES EXHIBIT enterprises,I.I.C. CLIENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISES )K PROPOSED WATER LINE a7 an attain S&M Born Mi 1S FIELD WORK. DATE:09/10/02 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 F 597 S DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:NTS N:\3384\OD3\ACAD\MASTERPV\UTM-EXTEND-PH45E.4..9 CHECKED BY:GJS PROJ J:3384.003 1 SHEET I OF I A Durston Rood (Minor Arterial) DURSTON PARKWAY - - - — - - — - - - - - "— - - - — - - - - ==tea — � I I I I II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP j HERiTAUL SCHOOL IS I IAN SOCCER FIELDS I I I I I 1•„'� I J I I ' NOTE: SPECIFIC ROAD r IgT IN THIS AREA TOO BE DETERMINED Toole Street WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY 1 I OWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. I t� f II I ! — _ — _ — — — — — — Cascade Street Ir :,•\ II I � I I � � � I \) I -' X II o r. ii a) �LLu West Bobco& o p II of 0 -0 Z � Street (Minor Arterial) o Y Y II Qmo i W W Lu II O a i I a� U U m II 3 a_ c 01 o a I °' Lu LEGEND m i m II a II s PHASE BOUNDARY VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION `I — — — -f — — EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) i PHASE 6 UTILIITES EXHIBIT • _ — — — _ IN ASSOCIATION WITH: 1 EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) ow¢n MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. P ® — ® .— PROPOSED SEWER LINE a •moo R U G H MAIERLE,►nc. PHASE 6 .,,mva...-o...e oe L E N O N . Pon n,bm aspen -_I-- - -- --- _- -'• CLIENT:ASPEN ENTFRPR15E5 UTILITIES EXHIBIT enterprises,I.I.c. K PLOTTED DATE: Nov 13 — ---7C-- PROPOSED WATER LINE - - / /2002 E2-Past Main 9aNet Bo:emnn.MT 597E FIELD WORK DATE:09/10/02 S DRAWING NAME: DRAWN 9Y: TODD/MCW SCALE:NTs H:\3]84\00}\ACAD\MASTERPION\UTIL-EXTEND-PHASE-2.dw9 CHECKED eY:0J5 PROJ#:3384.003 SHEET 1 OF I I Durston Road (Minor Arterial) Lt�jII II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP I G _ 'I II I HERITAGE CHRISTIAN I lc�j , EZ11 E��] E��D I II SCHOOL IIII SOCCER FIELDS I hI -70 I I () NOTE: SPECIFIC ROAD LAYOUT IN THIS AREA TO 9E OR •, WRH ADJOININGNG P PROPEOPS RTY III •, OWNERS IN FUTURE PWI$E$. NOTE: WATER AND SEWER TRUNK FACILITIES INCLUDING - I 'SEWAGE LIFT STATION IN OURSTON-ROAD ARE SCHEDULED \ TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO PHASE 7 CONSTRUCTION. II I I I t = I o II cj�w= West Babcock I 75 p II � Z I II o Street (Minor Arterial ui W I o t L ccOrm II 3a W W O I I LEGEND PHASE BOUNDARY ' VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) PHASE 7 UTILIITES EXHIBIT _ — — — — IN AssOCIATION WITH: —D6-- — �— — EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) rr , MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. ® - 9-- .— PROPOSED SEWER LINE P R U G H I MAIERLE,INC. PHASE 7 a LENON �:��.�•" �,.• aspen - - -- -- NT: UTILITIES EXHIBIT • _ __,�_ enterprises,I.I.C. 'Et Mam elm Oomlmn,MT 9" CLIENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISES PROPOSED WATER LINE p �--— - ... - w PLOTTED GATE: Nov/13/2002 5 5 FIELD WORK DATE:09/10/02 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD/MCW SCALE:NTS H:\3384\0 0 3\ACM\HASTERPLM\VTIL-EnEND-PKASE-2.dw9 -j CHECKED BY:GJS PROJ #:338<A03 SHEET 1 OF 1 Durston Road I (Minor Arterial) I � II II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP II � II I — I j HERITAGE HRISTIAN SCHOOL II SOCCER FIELDS I �' I o NOTE: SPECIFIC ROAD I LAYOUT IN THIS AREA 1 TO BE DETERMINED WTH ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS IN FUTURE PRASES. I I I Map h I I II f I � , .: NOTE: WATER AND SEWER TRUNK FACILITIES INCLUDING ••� II — — — — — — I — — — — — — — — — — v — — -- — — — I SEWAGE LIFT STATION IN DURSTON ROAD ARE SCHEDULED \ TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO PHASE 7 CONSTRUCTION. I 1 I II I Q II a II Or West Babcock p II � II Q OR: Street (Minor Arterial) Q m Lu LuLu W II oQ II i o � Or x II 3 o a m oa I a LEGEND ¢ III Q m4 m II �a II PHASE BOUNDARY I VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION l — — — — — EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) PHASE 8 UTILIITES EXHIBIT — — — — ——0�- — ,-- — EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) IN ASSOCIATION WITH: L4]MORRISON °"°�° VVI e - .— PROPOSED SEWER LINE P R U G H ` 91AfO° VALLEY WEST SUB. MAIERLE,tNC. PHASE 8 L E NO a a.�..,�.bR.n.�cwa PAN n.IbR n.nN aspen _ �--- — -------- --, UTILITIES EXHIBIT �¢�-----fir'---�-- PROPOSED WATER LINE enterprises,I.I.C. CUENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISES } -'K PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 KA a7 EaA Main S Do:ma'm.MT 597.5 FIELD WORK• D0 DRAWN BY:-TODD/MCW SCALE:NTSATE:09/1 102 DRAWING NAME: R:\3381\003\uCM\MASfERPIAN\Ufll-E%iEND-PRg5E-7.a.9 CHECKED BY:CJS PROD fll3 .003 SHEET I OF 1 Durston Road I (Minor Arterial) AD I I I I » II II PRIVATE OWNERSHIP I I .. - — II - I HERITAGE CHRISTIAN I SCHOOL r � SOCCER FIELDS 1 I < I NOTE SPECIFIC ROAD I� I I II m �TOUBEIN THIS DEIERM/ANRED — — Toole Street 1 1• WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY IIII I II I p �\ OWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. 1 Cascode Street I III I p I � 1 I 1 \ I _ i E Q II o o of it > Q W= West Babcock o Y I Y II D' li ti Street (Minor Arterial) a I i Imo 0 � Of x II oa It O I 3 o U U Q o � �� m l Oa I Of c LEGEND x x Qm m it v o_ II PHASE BOUNDARY VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION •�` — — — - — — EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) PHASE V UTILIITES EXHIBIT — — — —D6-- — T — — — EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) IN" ssoc AnON WITH: 1 4MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. ED .— PROPOSED SEWER LINE P RUG�H MAIERLtjI c. ..�o-- ��°�° PHASE 9 .m AJYy'N•w�Tn jjj aspen LE N O N _ __ mnix--d as--n.am.—(W mbm -(�R�-��R UTILITIES EXHIBIT ^¢+---'--- -- PROPOSED WATER LINE ,I.I.C. CLIENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISESenterprises { ro PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 a)'FM Main SUM Bo:nmN+.Mi 597E5 FIELD WORK. DATE:09/10/02 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD/MCW SCALE:NTS „.\yye\OOy'CAO\MASTERPV\URL-EMEND-PHASE-2.d� CHECKED BY:GJS PROJ R:3384.003 SHEET I OF I Now Durston Road (Minor Arterial) II / II PRIVATEizll I I PRIVATE OWNERSHIP HERITAGE CHRISTIAN., — — SCHOOL - - - - - SOCCER FIELDS I I it I i o II I � I III, r I NOTE. SPECIFIC ROAD I� II I - - - - - - ',��) I wT0 BE DETHIS AR&j II �� Toole Street '1• WITH ADJOINING PROPERTY III / I i II I � •� OWNERS IN FUTURE PHASES. ` I It i I I II I ( I --� — -_ — --• �° —•—_ — —� Cascade Street I �� •- I � I II I i ! I - �_ — _ —_ __— _ ' \\ — - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - I T II o West Bobcock 0 o II ¢o= ^ p II II 'L Z o Street (Minor Arterial) o Qm6 c Y Y � it II o U U Q i g o cn w m l O a I tom' LEGEND x x II o a I m 0 II "v II PHASE BOUNDARY I VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION -f — — — — — — EXISTING SEWER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) PHASE 10 UTILIITES EXHIBIT / — — — —�— — �— — — — EXISTING WATER LINE (PRIOR TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS) IN ASSOCIATION WITH: - MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. e ® .— PROPOSED SEWER LINE P R U G H �MAIERLE INS. >����� PHASE 10 LI E N O N I " "'"�"w r I q ai I".e•tnA m.".a.am.roe'(aR at-om r"I�H let-N el aspen - UTILITIES EXHIBIT _ ♦ • CLIEN T:ASFEN ENTERPRISES PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 .- —�— PROPOSED WATER LINE enterprises,I.I. 'a7 Fmt Mnm Sant -Oa¢mt MT 597�5 FIELD WORK: DATE:09/10/02 DRAWING NAME: - y DRAWN BY: TODD/MCW SCALE:NTS H:\]384\00]\ACAD\YASTERPt \UIL-EXTEND-PHASE-2.4«q CHECKED BY•GJS pROJ TA.4.003 SHEET 1 OF � � s I I I I Durston Road i t (Minor DURSTON PARKPARKWAY /i tt PRIVATE OWNERSHIP HERITAGE CHRISTIAN i SCHOOL r�: I SOCCER FIELD i xorE.uraurerv¢aowM _ TO BE urrrrmurro Toole Street . - � _ nm1 nwouvc atOPCRn . � VI, � omrxs w nauxr wkus LID USE LEGEND Cascade Street PARKS 30% ACRES �. RBSmENTIAI. 3% 1 9 ACRES 10.12 Units/Acre \ REMENTIAL 24% 74 ACRE 8-10 UnftlAare 1 RESSIDENTtAL 17% I 54ACRES � BABCOCK PARKWAY , f 6-8 Urft/Acre J COMMERCIAL 3% 8 ACRES C I I > ix West(Minor ArterW)treet o o �o� I I )-a i a' Y L 0 STREET R.O.W. 23% 70 ACRES o I Ia N 34 III u TOTAL 100% 309 ACM g u WETLANDS LEGEND LncUsrRnvE MASTER PLAN 9CAUL I"-SW PALUSTRINE VALLEY WEST PUD VWP Bozeman. MT RIVEPJM P R U G H November LENON 2001 10, � r. Mots-}ter- �1u,�� I I I Durston Road (Minor Arterial) • `''` .�>-s•. _��:.� _ fix-- I T i PRIVATE OWNERSHIP o SOCCER FIELDS � HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL I ; I � w Toole Street t I ; P I ` � 1 I ' I I Cascade Street I , LAND USE LEGEND PARKS 63% 495 ACRffi � H"' L I RBSID$NTIAL 9% 65 ACRES ' A AftachedIII L UAI K PARKPA K AY RgMg[MAL 9% 6 ACRHS �'/ADU-M b i i a, o x West Babcock Street Wp a q>q p Q (Minor Arterial) P4 RffiIDSNTIAL 7% 5 ACRES b' Q I o g SF/ADU-0 ° a y &M STIUM R.O.W. 12% S ACRffi �j Ell TOTAL 100% 69 ACRES I � WETLANDS LEGEND PHASE 1 PLAN 4 scw� r=son - PALLTSI'R1NB 1 ITT VALLEY WEST PUD VWP Bozeman. MT RNHRINE P RUG H L E NCO N November2001 • f�ii1�Vi®K i 4 4 II IIII � I IIII Durston Road it (Minor Arterial)OUqI PAR, I - - V PWAIE 0"NERAQP I r¢Rnux clmrnuD snroa SOCCER F7ELDS - , RDTC 9i[NC'RDAD "Y=w Day ARG to 9E DEIEf—ED Toole Street "An'M ov PRDPEHIY DrmER9 PI Ram PWt9E9. ® i Cascade Street PEDESTRIAN aRCULATION LEGEND TRAILS ----- - J � C b I I w o x West Babcock Street ° I I I o C (Minor Arterial) 0 CONC SMEWALK w c I I ICU o U U d 0 0 MSS) c Q: QOff 1 o I I P4 w CONC SMEWALK u° (Ch7 ) I STREE75 P 'DESTRLAN PIAN SCALE 1"=SW VALLEY WEST PUD VWP Bozeman,MT P_R U G H November LBNON zoo, f P:\w STREET—NAMESreviseA.Awg, 11/20/2.002 02:44:50 PM, rob .I Westmorland Drive 1 a. 0 � a - -- w m Laurel Parkway ---- 0 o 0 0 pa Westmorland Drive va tghn Va eve BAXTER CREEK !\ BAXTER CREEK TRAIL \ -- --- - ---..-'- x qtz 0 [l Brenden Ave lier BAXTER DITCH O O ' Cottonwood Road ...... ...... - - (Principal Arterial) Cottonwood Road --_— —_--—_ —_ ---(Principal Arterial) ----- A Staffo 7 1 Ave — - -C-- --- ---- - m G � A � N X M 5 --- -- --- a (n cn (n (n LL� -to ------- �1 rT Resort Drive Clifden Drive _._._._----- -- -....... lifd Drive MAYNARD -BORDER z DITCH anle Nvenia �0 1 �n < rx 0 P. M 2 c cn (T 4 cn 99 $ �En � q -- --ILJI — i o Mfg::; '. r- I I Kimball Av n e 0 d IL zix M FergusonCn oad -------.....---.._...._...._..-----... __......--------....... guson Ferguson Road CCJ (Collector) (Collector) 29 z / n� �/ i O � t y � z 0 w 00 vh C O O O O O O v x n W 0 BAXTER CREEK M BAXTER CREEK TRAIL 6 n O m o 0 �� rn 0 Q I., BAXTER DITCH J C.ottonnood .acd (Princioci Arterld) COTTONWOOD PARKWAY N O O � A n m 0 z x Z N In 'a O �x O Resort Or!•:•e v' ! rtl •: A � ' = � d m s Rp p= j 2z:3 acB o � 9 mjx � �7-, Ferguson Nood K o ICD i� F-ERCUSON PARKISAY t.,j= n n u v c A n D Z P Q rD px in n Z r o O /z t" n o Zo o Z 4 d t 0 � � �, •cam EVA PRIVATE OWNERSHIP HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL r j�j ribFml 1�I ICI iuiwiw,4 6�.�crr��a •ryy�'i�_I �� � 1. � rs� � � � Y� /i i6iir.�rr.r.r���z�a I = Street 1 _b■ ..r�.� ai _! i Jw.L- �'� _iia•nrai.�rrs�rrrai_ Jr]� � rr, c;��r�r -' u.•�rr _ Vie='y,rawr.siria$:ia i�rmss� i =N�,•rrm.��crr �iC�i III f I , MORRISON OMNI • PRINCIPAL . . • • • - .aspen- 1kRCHITLCTS PLO ATE No�2061 Kill W\3384\0Q2\4CAD\CMXEIlT\TRVF-�g ,. �, �. ,milk AIIIIIIIIII, VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Boo o o I o \ o F1I o \FOUND 5/8"RL WITH 45 ALUMIf�IUM CAP(NO KINGS) S3 45 --. ...-- 45 REBAR FOUND 5/! R/H..` 1 O.B. ;i R DURSTON ROAD :� I 777T - i i 20'%UTILITY.� t0 i-EMENT(iYPJ �1'1 � : rDING"SETBACK & I; ( 1-- ---' --" - 1'•''. T. EN ENAN BRONKEN PAR COR1100. RIDO M t !-- ( - 3906DRCFI MAl E`•, _�: EAS M T�35�Ff20 ORDI ARl' 1 ID�2�� 0' /I'•. 30' DRGH- I •-- ` UT�LTTYRACT1= AC I•'IGH WATER.,MAR - II. J==--;-�-•---, "EAS NT °MAI N C 1 20"UTILITY__ ... �~ •CACo•MC CITE~y 1 `• -III I EASEMEN{(ttP. TRACT,4 hxr - 1 %�� '��^'18 59 C Iti DITCH MAIN7HNAN'CE" — A• , \ I1� & Lltt EASENT' I a ESTIMATED,10'0_ ____________________________ I 10, `UTOTY - LI _• HIGH WATER-. M _,__________________________ 1 '11.I FROM R — 1 I D D I C) esnwiim lao=' •ruicR'sukF :' �"1'•r .L- -EASEMENT - i \ % HIGH.WATER'MARK_TO P O 50_BUILD#G I (n'P), - ,� "PROPERTY LINE 1 I EXISTING VALLEY WEST i SETBACK r 1 f- BUILDING-SETBACK &'DRCH, I( I r^�I �� -• - `-� '. L 61AINJENANCE EASEMENT}5'J�'� � - - I - eyj °' _ SUBDIVISION EiU1LDINI i ETBACK•& // EASLA7 U ILL TP. FR 'OR NARt`- _70' UTlUTYJ "��[, ��� `-�-`F I , - -\ (DITCH NTEI�.ANCE •yy i , - _ EASEMENT � '�1 I1 �'. TRACT 2�' I ,I� '� (10 TRACTS) i -' 'L,�i t• FA. "•35' TRACT 1 :�11 I if '` ._- 1 I '\i` 16.33 AC i I �OlI RU�NARY' ss:i2 AC a'1 -- `I BLOCK 2.- . {,. 1. ._ .- •, ::�%'. HIGH ER' RK/ .•f' i; 'TRACL.3 - _ ' I I� 30; SEWER,,WATER i 1 •�. ) .I i'- .. � 'I I 20.66 AC n1$1,i -. j;I�`OR STORM"'DRAIN-, unU?Y EASEMENT' 60 R/W ---- --------- tD}U llnlu RI_O(K. :3 69:..SrREEr&.•' .._120' R I1TiUnY/DRAINAGE' ] If EASEMENT �1 10' UTILITY'-- UTILITY EASEMENT 60. 1 60j/ �-�' t'00' STREAM CORRIDOR t�'J43U- -__ --_�_t--_117CH;EASEMENT--_ 1 I _ (ttP.)`, 11 EASEMENT 30- .,'- ------ I. I 1 1`�-------- ----______�- L------------ -------- i- — = --- ------------------- • 1' �I I E 1 OYOTIUtt }p ''�" ,•�, L-STOR - .-- it t♦10' UTILITY _ I I • A\ II-; EMENT - - i I 10:_UTIUlY I EASEMENT ._ 1 2 _ p h1 /�-'� -.-. •L% ��I� I- TER�&_ BLOCK 1/-. S.E.T i BUILDING SETBACK & ^-,_- i I MENT --- �'�1---DITCH MAINTENANCE IF �• ,II TRACT 2- ''iBUILDING SETBACK & I1 21.57 AC - I ' EM NE - %-- SO R,IDITCH MAINIE,NANCE_BUILDING'SETBACK;& - a ---TRACT 2- EASEMENT 35' IGWATER MARK;ffI 29 87 AC "FRO DITCH MAINTENANCE i ;9 M ORDINARYHIGH WATER MARK , ,EASEMENT•35' � _,.� v ,-1, -- _..T.RACT i ._- �I BUILDING SETBACK & �`;` FROM ORIDINARY ir===-=_-__ , OO � \ - 26.86 ACDITCH MAINTENANCE ' HIGH WATER MARK_i l •jl3EASEMENT 35' i A I t;t tA.._ BAXTER Go'& FROM ORDINARY `Fi �A ES7IMATLU 100-YEAR 1 E` 14 1�`iRAC�l1 ._.. ' -_- I„I•'{I i , HIGH WATER MARK ;I:.,,;AA HIGH WATER LIMITS_--11 TRACT } I I 4.02 AC !I" 1 �p.`�� Rsloinrzu ru,-rwi 11 5.01 AC I ' '' I _ 20 UTILITY DRAINAGE L wArER stmFACE 1 ,.100' STREAM CORRIDOR--�j C I .. / _...I .:1 I /� ! I 0 1.-, 1I �_. _ Iq�:,I '-DITCH EASEMENT 1 A atv-ms.e, 1 ..__. , Lounon 1✓ �-J I .-'--'t r _ I f I - '20' UTILITY I < ✓�11 ��I I some.%.. 11 .......�. '._. --I-� I' EASEMENT TYP.) 45' R%W`; -- - --- i --i / I SEG/4 10 EXISTING J I FOUND 4' BRASS CAP IN 45 STREET & I MONUMENT BOX UTILITY EASEMENT( LEGEND FOUND US PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SECTION CORNER MONUMENT p FOUND MONUMENT BOX FOUND US PUBLIC LAND SURVEY 1/4 SET SO" dia. REBAR w/�YELLOW PLASTIC CAP SECTION CORNER MONUMENT MARKED-'MORkISON-MAIERLE, INC. O FOUND 5/8" dia. REBAR W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP we WRNESS CORNER • MARKEDOAIERLE, INC" -- - -- � FOUND AR W/YELLOw PLASTIC CAP --EASEMENT LINE IN ASSOCIATIONWRH: MARKED 1 3111E5//2" dio. REBAR - -- Qo FOUND 5/8" dio. REBAR ---'SETBACK LINE MORRISON VALLEY WEST ---—---WATER COURSE O FOUND 2"ALUMINUM CAP MARKED KERIN & ASSOCIATES a R aU G H MAIERLE lxc. ffi PRELIMINARY PLAN s�ar� """""'••'••'-"'ESTIMATED HIGH WATER LIMITS - E K O N r11am n oa�mnam•w�(ap��n aTap�r, FOUND 2� ALUMINUM CAP MARKED WESTERN EXISTING VALLEY WEST SUBDMSION BOUNDARY 0 150 300 600 aspen EXISTING SITE COND. IIIIIIS �� Bn1BTpTI5J5,LLC. CLIENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISES LOTUNES � PLOTTED DATE: Nov/16/2001 SCALE:1'=300' bUl.SoM 11 m NIT 59r7l5 FIELD WORK• DATE:11/12/01 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:1"=300' H:\33e4\003\ACAD\OONCEPT\E.W+ slecuw+ -t;. l.dn Tlhe Drevwnp Has Been Reams CHECKED BY:CJS PROD 3384.003 050 SHEET 1 OF _J— ! VALLEf NEST SUBDIVISION PRELIMINAAY PLAN AVAILABLE STREET FACILITIES k I 1 ao o ( n o I I � D n { 1 \— i i _�- t „ice t C�— ' t,J. GRAPHIC SCALE 250 0 125 250 500 1000 I _-- .csr s�9mor s,9¢r I �,I—�—I �_._L.�I• ( IN FEEL' ) t mce e 500 It { I • ii i i a jy�C j�—i p�, 1, 'I— t �' I I��fi�.v I--I 1 —i i i ( i I _. I_I ;a� ,.. ;I LEGEND — ---------— f❑. I ! i I irs: i rj I' lTI —y% {—�= 1—(Ji i I I t SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY FT—I P. EXISTING STREETS STORM DRAIN INLET 1nyl$lU A]MORRISON VALLEY WEST y MAIERLE�►ac. PRELIMINARY PLAN '°`°°�°HIERPR AVAIL. STREET FACILITIE CLIEN5 PEN EISES FIELD WORK DATE:11/12/01 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/12/2001 DRAWN BY: TODD SCA�;1'=500' DRAWING NAME: K\3354\007\AM\CWCEFr\So-e tFocMi I dt q CHECKED BY-OJS PROD k,1,3&A00 050 SHEET I OF I f VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN AVAILABLE WATER FACILITIES •°1 I I ! j o , o o � _ � o f j o o 1 j i 1 DURSTON RDA GRAPHIC SCALE — _ sao o ,00 zoo aoo soo IN FEET ,Ines 40O ,L 12 I LEGEND SUBDMSION BOUNDARY WATER LINE I i o� � 1 �I ; j lR WEST BABCOCK ST.cif II-j i ( ! ! � I 1 i !`� I ! j12 ( of -- `—i— k � ) I I Zry4 I �l MORRISON VALLEY WEST . I MAIERLEjNc. PRELEMI NARY PLAN um— `6mAVAIL WATER FACILITIES CLIENT.-ASPEN ENTERPRISES • FIELD WORK- DATE 11 h2/O1 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/12/2001 DRAWN BY: TODD 1'=400' DRAWING NAME: SCALE: H:\3381\ao3VCAo\CONC¢vM ioueww,.a.g CHECKED BY•GJS PROD3384.003 O50 SHEET t F • 0 VALL WEST SUBDIVISION PRELIMINAA PLAN AVAILABLE SEWER FACILITIES , ! 1 I i ', i i I 21• ' jlll 1 21' I 1 i ! ; i o I � i \\ ! 18• 8- p��o C7 o 1 ! ! _DURSTON RD. _ __ —_ _ _ -1 _• L r GRAPHIC SCALE �� 200 0 100 200 400 aoo I ,—•I I i.?��' T—I I 1 mce= soot IN FErr fL iz i 1-i H 12 t-I LEGEND i ' _ �°' •'� ' I i '�_j t1—� ! l�1_ SUBDMSION BOUNDARY f i ! fV! I I i .�I� ! _ r • MANHOLE SEWER LINE I i_ I r I I i ten- L RE I ; O� WEST BABCOCK-ST. I j I I f -� C Wit.I r-�'� L . j PA RsK I r--� FT i ! I I r MORRISON VALLEY WEST MAIEn,L " ­ PRELIMINARY PLAN CLIENT-ASPEN ENTERPRISES AVAIL.SEWER FACILITIES PLOTTED DATE: Nov/12/2001 FIELD WORK• DATE:11/12/OI DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:1'=400' M•\3,,as\oos\AcAo\c+OCPMwaw s--I.a.g I CHECKED BYL9 PRgI a.3384.003 O50I SHEET J OF 1_ 1 • VALLTY WEST SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN 1p ADJACENT LAND USES 4 i i I I I I I I AS AS A5 � AS AS AS AS E ;r. AS ' I AS AS AS ! ' ' AS I AS I AS I ° I AS! I I I 1 a i I I R37A I i � r� "a 0 ` 0 I I I E Li ,-1 I ew. oQan� i k AS C�' L4� 0 J I• � � I - w —II—1 I �� 0�o sow 00 !Kris OrawlnB Has Been Retl uoeM Z4 (�7I AS AS i AS ; i ;J I �'_]t • I DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY T� �j F i!1 TI BLOCK BOUNDARY R. 4 P:'.Rf: --i! WETLANDS �® �-- AS AS AS 1 z Ir�I �•,�i lid I R4 II ' r R O I,���T f-T'T���, PARKS ' J pt"� , 1 Li RESIDENTIAL SN } t - !I lllii 1 E. Imo' AS ± AS i BP ' ' ` BP jI COMMERCIAL m AS �� I 0 El t--= I0 I \ I s tiD '1. i • a ! ; — (I I ' B P _ --; ZONING DESIGNATION R 3 IN ASsoc -nON WITH: CMMORRISON VALLEY WEST P R U G HNON MAIERMINC. PRELMNARY PLAN LE aspen ::u�'�'�"n mn•'�1®�" ""°° "°' ADJACENT LAND USES ENTERPRISES enterprises,I.I.C. a CLIENT:ASPEN EN PLOTTED DATE: Nov/16/2001 a)Fast Main Ghat Boaam KT f97aS FIELD WORK• DATE:11/12/O1 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE: -500 H:\33S4\003\ACAD\CONCEFr\Adic t w dUn-IA" CHECKED BYSZ PRO,1 :3364.003 050 SHEET--L—OF —L— • ' 9 • I I I Durston Road i t (Minor Arterial) j i 1 Area#4 t SOCCER n I V Area#3 Toole Street I' LL Area— e#5 I I ® Cascade Street , i Area# OPEN SPACE Area F-1 PURM PARKS 84 ACRES r I 1 FMATB PARKS 8 ACRES p't�lkAooeee) ' TOTAL PARKS 92 ACRffi ——— ,——— ,. I I ' = West nor Babcock Street w tx., � �• I I � q�mo c� I I � TOTAL ACRES 309 ACRES 0 u o I I ° PC OPEN SPACE 30% ICI OPEN SPACE ACTIVE IUXMAIWN SCAM 1"o SW AREA 22 ACRES OI O (some) 12 ACRES N (Op-twm) 10ACRSS VALLEY WEST PUD VWP w 1 Bozeman, MT d 1 I P R U G H November S®ATTACEMNARRMM L'E N O N 2002 FMAREA DESOU BONS 0 i o_ d A • • Valley West Planned Unit Development Open Space Amenity Development Plan Play and Picnic Area #1 (areas as labeled on preceding Open Space drawing) Active Play Use Area This traditional play area was developed for children ages 2 to 12. This area has currently been developed with Phase 1 implementation. The pathways to reach the playground have been constructed from gravel according to the City of Bozeman standards. This area has a formal playground with equipment such as swings, slide, buck-a-bout, and sandbox. The playground surfacing is fiber mulch, specially engineered to meet ADA and CPC standards. A large berm has been placed close to the playground to provide an additional play area for children ages 2 to 5. Several picnic tables and benches have been placed around the site for parental observation and family gatherings. The area directly north of the playground will be graded to become an informal open space and turf play area. Unstructured field sports may occur in this area such as soccer, kite flying and event gathering. Play and Picnic Area #2 Community Park The overall community park will consist of active and passive recreation areas. At the intersection of Clifden Drive and E. Perry Street, a maintained and irrigated picnic and play area will be constructed. This area has been designated for a themed playground. Equipment and structures placed here will be ADA compliant and low maintenance. The • themed playground will target children ages 5 to 12. The purpose of this type of playground is not only to provide enjoyable activities, but also to provide a learning experience for the children as well. The location is ideal in that it anchors the open space as east-west connection along Perry Street. The gravel pathways in this area will be consistent with the south side of the corridor. Picnic tables, a picnic shelter and benches will be provided for gatherings and relaxation. Play and Picnic Area #3 Soccer Fields The soccer fields are currently under development and are owned and maintained by the City of Bozeman. This will provide active recreation activities to a variety of age groups and users for the region and community. It should be noted that the parcel of land between Theodore and Waters Street might be developed as a school site. Within the school side a play area could be provided. Ideally, a traditional play area should be placed near the intersection of Theodore Street and Vaughn Drive. A small playground targeted for 2-5 year olds would be a preferable designation for this area. This area could provide a safe activity for pre-school children while school-age children are playing soccer. Benches should be provided for parental supervision of play activities. Equipment placed here should be ADA compliant and low maintenance. This area will also have a trail and/or boardwalk connection through the wetlands complex and past to the residential lots to the west. Educational and interpretative opportunities may exist along this trail to educate users on wetlands and wildlife, which could:create an excellent outdoor classroom opportunity for the nearby school. i • Picnic Area#4 Commercial Picnic Area The southwest corner of the commercial parcel near Durston Road and Laurel Parkway will have a designated picnic area. The targeted users for this area will be users of the commercial development. This area will be formal lawn area with tree plantings and picnic tables. The orientation of this area takes advantage of the warm sun during the afternoon and evening. A potential boardwalk may cross the open water to connect people with the residential development to the west. This may allow people the option to walk to work. Opportunities for interpretation may occur here as well as large open spaces for event planning and community gathering. Pathways through this picnic area are more likely to be concrete versus gravel due to the adjacent land use. Play and Picnic Area#5 Lake Access/Day Use Area This area, located at the mid-block of Westmorland Drive provides access to the lake for non-motorized access activities, such as canoeing, fishing or swimming. This area will have maintained and irrigated grasses as well as picnic shelters available for use. Large open spaces will be provided for unstructured field sports such as flag football or other activities such as sand volleyball or croquet. Pathways in this area will be a combination of gravel and concrete pathways. All access to water activities and picnic shelters will be ADA accessible. • Play Area#6 Neighborhood Play Area This area located off the terminus of Alexander Street is an ideal location for a small play area. This area may have simple playground equipment such as a swing and slide for use by 2 to 12 year-olds. Because it is located along the Baxter Creek Trail, a two to three park benches will be included for users of the trail and play area. This area would service the neighborhood to the west of Cottonwood Road. No children would have to cross a principal arterial street to get to a playground. The surfacing would be ADA compliant and the equipment would be low maintenance. For additional information, review Section 14: "Landscape Plan." io • TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA OR ENCROACH 'MAXIMUM I TBACK TRANSITIONAL LANDSCAPE CCR REQUIRES OWNERS TO NT LAWN AND STREET THE ALLEY DEPICTING 30'ROW WITH 14'PAVED LANE • FOUR F ALK DERING \ fA � M 5' 10' 6' 10' 10' 6' 8' g I 4' 3" 15'Setback 150' 5' W4L ULEVARD BIKE DRIVING DRIVING BIKE PARKIN yugL iEPORCHNCRO MAY LANE LANE LANE LANE LANE ENCROACH BABCOCK STREET 30' {e 90'ROW/40'STREET WIDTH �5'MAXIMUM (MINOR ARTERIAL) TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA -CCR REQUIRES HOMEOWNER TO PLANT LAWN AND STREET TREES CONSISTANT TRADITIONAL PLANTING OF MAPLES TRANSITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA !�_(MlXEDSPEICfES)ADONG ARTERIA,TREETS MEDIAN TO BE PLANTED WITH \� ° SHRUBS ONLY Z - V 0 (UNDERGROUND UTILITIES) �,.. I I T • I D r IQAo i j 1all& JL Or--% • war 1'OFF SET _ _ r 1'OFFSET COTTONWOOD STREET I 30'ROW I 20'ROW 5' 15.51 8' 12' 12' 3 ' 12' 12' 8' 5.5' S' I 20'SETBACK I (PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET) 1 FOR DITCH I UTILITY EASEMENT Wr,L BLVD. DRIVING MEDIANBLVD DRIVING BLVD. L PORCH MAY 11 LANE LANE LANE LANE LANE LANE ENCROACH 120'ROW 32'STRE T WIDTH 5'MAXIMUM NSITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA TRADITION NDSCAPE AREA TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA CCR REQUIRES HOMEOWNER TO PLANT LAWN AND STREET TREES CONTOUR MOWING OF NATIVE GRASSES- PROVIDE MINIMUM MIXED NATIVE SPECIES IRRIGATION IN MOWN AREA — BAXTER CREEK TRAIL • v ° � I I -n I LONDEN DRIVE ' I I (TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET) NATURAL WETLAND AREA 5' 15' 5' ' I 8' 9' 9' 8' 7.5' 5' 1 TSETBACK MOW AREA VIAL BLV PCRCH MAY LANE LANE LANE LANE BLVD. WALK ENCROACH 60'ROW If 3TSTREETWII 5'MAXIMUM R VALLEY WEST PUD VWP • �_� B02t PR N.!ON 0 2.5 i 10 20 L -E�' November 2001 SCALE I"-IU' FISCHER&ASSOCIATES TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS LANDSCAPE AYCHITECTUtE I COMMUNITY IIANNI NG • "`" 5' SET BACK 5 APPROACH , GARAGE MIX OF CONIFERS o+, GARAGE ,�` EES AN SMALL SHRUBS '� O�NAME TAIL � , FENCE SET BACK UTILITY EA ENT i 5' MAXIMUM 4'.HEIGHT 116110'>1U 5' ' ' ' ' 7 1 g 7 S TYPICAL 30' PAVED ALLEY 0 2.5 5 10 20 -- SCALE t"-10' /irY.fir .i�/' _s ri,J t�fYR I r �H:t c.S BXi'�r/.I n e� /i:l{•t. —" FENCE SET BACK 3' -- -''�- f'--� - 4' HEIGHT PAVED AREA 2 X 2 CROSSCUT MAXIMUM _ : BORDER 5' SET BACK AND 5' SET BACK AND l`ram 14- 1 UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT s�- FENCE SET BACK ool �x .b'r 5' MAXIMUM 4' HEIGHT 5 APPROACH DESTRIAN< TH (FENCE ADJACEN TO PARK OR C MMON , "� ?�• GARAGE @ SPACE MUST BE TYKE AS PRESCRIBED IN "•� ARCHITECTURAL CCR S TYPICAL ALLEY/PEDESTRIAN INTERSECTION 00 i� 0 2S 5 ID 20 L31 14' 13 5' BUILD TO LINE SCALE 1"=tO' TYPICAL 20' PAVED ALLEY 0 2.5 5 10 20 ���•---'- - - SCALE t"=10' ATTACHED ROW HOUSES WALK ME fV IRS GENTLY FERGUSON MEADOWS • - 20' DRAIN WITHIN BOULEV SUBDIVISION EASEMENT TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPE EXISTING DITCH 40' STREET WIDTH L I I 130' ROW 15' P.L 0i 5' 24' 8' 5' 11 11' 5' TYPICAL ALLEY SET BECK L BOULEVARD —`—r— R FL ALLOWANCE bANCE FERGUSON STREET FOR PORCH VALLEY WEST PUD \n^' Bozeman,M7 _ Y 0 2.55 . 10 20 PRUGH SCALE t"-10' L E N O N November 2001 .rrrwm� e®.wurzn�i ERG FISCHER&ASSOCIATES QI�4F�Y I cy& ..... ON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I COMMUNITY PLANNING KVXUVIV low -77 SKETCH DEPICTING BOARDWALK SKETCH DEPICTING PEDESTRIAN PATHS OPEN GREENSPACE PLANT GROUPINGS NATIVE FOR RECREATIONAL PLAY MIXED TREES AND SHRUBS TRANSITIONAL LANDSCAPE CONTOUR MOW GRASS PLANT NATIVE WETLAND THROUGHOUT PARK TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPE WHERE NO WALK EXISTS SPECIES TRANSITIONAL LANDSCAPE /r MOWED GRASS BERM WOODEN BOARDWALK --- r SOFT SURFACE e a PATH MEANDERINGAMMER r f 8 9 1, 9 8 I J_' ; 5.5' 8' 9' 9' 8' AL 100' ROW — WETLAND / NATIVE LANDSCAPE BLVD. ARKIN DRIVE DRIVE AR KIN BLVD. PARKIN DRIVE DRIVE PARKIN BLVD. NE LANE NE LANE LANE LANE LANE LANE HALEY AVENUE ru MAYNARD BORDER PARK VAUGHN DRIVE 0 ?S 5 ID 20 SCALE L"-LO' VALLEY WEST PUD VWP Bozman•MT 40LENON L E N O Nam. Nowmear - �'J A 2001 v srrraa Ds.s.arsn.s FISCHER &ASSOCIATES MAYNARD BORDER PARK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I COMMUNITY PLANNING • s • Plant material placed to take advantage of storm water run- off and filter pollutants Residential t Residential Building = Dry Cobble Swale-sized to Building accommodate storm r -off �I F Required Meandering Required Building Pedestrian Walkway Cluster Plantings Building Setback 5'Width Setback Greenspace Corridor- 60'Width Greenspace Corridor Cross-Section --� Valley West Subdivision -'' .� ,r • 11 • DRAINAGE PLAN Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development BOZEMAN, MONTANA Prepared for: Aspen Enterprises, L.L.C. M.0-R-R-ISON �® MAIERLE, -INC, An Employee-Owned Company Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59718 • Project Engineers: Greg Stratton, P.E. Jim Ullman, P.E. Introduction • The Valle West Subdivision is primarily a residential development located in the Y P Y p City of Bozeman south of Durston Road and west of Ferguson Avenue as illustrated on the Vicinity Map. The development plan calls for mixed density traditional neighborhood housing with limited neighborhood commercial land uses on 310 acres. Prior land uses on this parcel are agricultural. More specifically pasture and hay production. This type of use is consistent with the surrounding area. The Major Drainage System in the Valley West Subdivision will be used to convey runoff from the development. The Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch is the primary drainage for the east portion of the property. Baxter Creek drains the west portions on the property. Baxter Ditch will be used to convey runoff from along Cottonwood Road to Baxter Creek. The Ferguson Drain, a storm drain .pipe to be constructed paralleling Ferguson Avenue will convey runoff from the eastern boundary of the property to the Maynard-Border Stream Ditch. These drainage ways are illustrated on the exhibit entitled "Valley West Subdivision— Major Drainage System." The minor drainage system for the Valley West Subdivision is made up of streets with curb & gutter, drainage swales, inlets, valley gutters, and detention ponds. • Runoff is collected in the streets and drainage swales, transported to detention ponds, and then released to the major drainage system. During larger storm events site grading provides a designated path to convey runoff to the receiving steams without inundating structures and minimizing erosion to the channel. MAJOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM Maynard-Border Ditch Flood Hazard Evaluation The Maynard-Border Stream ditch is the primary drainage conduit conveying runoff from the site. The characteristics of this stream-ditch and the effects of the development on the existing drainage system need to be examined to effectively mitigate and control post development runoff. This section studies the runoff characteristics of the Maynard-Border stream- ditch. The impacts of the development on the existing drainage system are considered. A drainage plan to mitigate and effectively control runoff from the development and minimize the effects to the existing stream channel is provided. Existing Basin Characteristics The existing drainage.system of the Maynard-Border stream-ditch flows to the • north and eventually drains into the East Gallatin River. The Maynard-Border stream-ditch is not mapped by the National Flood Insurance Program for the 100- year flood plain. The drainage basin is less than twenty-five square miles and 1 of 15 HA3 3 84\003\Dra inage\Val ley West Drainage Study.doc therefore does not require flood hazard evaluation under chapter 16.20 of the City of Bozeman Interim Subdivision Regulations. • The Maynard-Border stream-ditch originates approximately 4 miles south of the Valley West Subdivision. The drainage basin south of Durston Road is 1165 acres more or less. The exhibit entitled "Drainage Basin for Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch provides an illustration of the existing drainage basin. Current land uses include agricultural, commercial, and a residential mobile home park. The_agricultural uses include a combination of crops (hay and grain) and pasture. A summary of the current land uses is:" Agricultural 89% 1038 acres± Commercial 3% 34 acres + Residential 8% 93 acres + In order, to effectively evaluate the drainage a summary of the land uses at various locations along the Maynard-Border. stream-ditch basin channel is necessary. The following provides a summary of the existing basin characteristics at several key locations along the basin. @ Proposed Cascade Street Crossing: Agricultural 750 acres± Residential 33 acres + Total Basin Area 783 acres + • @ Existing Babcock Street Crossing: Agricultural 722 acres± Residential 33 acres + Total Basin Area 755 acres + @ Existing Highway 191 Crossing: Agricultural 603 acres± Residential 33 acres + Total Basin Area 636 acres + @ Existing Farmer's Canal Crossing:. Agricultural 585 acres± Total Basin Area 585 acres + • 2 of 15 H:\3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc Channel Characteristics • Examining the characteristics of the existing Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch channel is an important step in the evaluation of the drainage system. The flow characteristics of the channel and existing culverts along the channel are assessed to determine their capacities. The capacities of these culverts are compared to the estimated post-development runoff along the channel. This comparison is used to estimate the actual flow in the channel and the water surface profile for the 100-year storm event in the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch after development. There are numerous manmade features on the channel that interrupt flood flows within the natural basin. They include roadways, irrigation facilities, and culverts. The first major feature is the Farmer's Canal. This irrigation canal intercepts runoff draining from 585 acres of agricultural land to the south. Runoff flows directly into the canal or ponds on the south side of the canal. A diversion allows flow to be conveyed from the canal into the Maynard-Border stream-ditch and continue flowing to the north. The diversion consists of a 30" CMP with a headgate. Flow in the Maynard-Border stream-ditch drainage basin is conveyed under Durston Road by three culverts. Primary flow in the ditch is conveyed under . Durston Road by a 53"x41" CMPA and continues to the north. A 28"x20" CMPA • carries additional irrigation flow across Durston Road and into a separate channel flowing west. Flow into both of these culverts can be controlled by headgate structures at the inlet of the pipes. An 18" CMP with a headgate allows excess flow into the ditch along the south side of Durston Road flowing to the east. This flow is combined with runoff draining from the east portion of the drainage basin and is transported under Durston Road by a 35"x24" CMPA. The drainage area at this location incorporates a larger area as flows from the east side of Ferguson Avenue are diverted under that road to this culvert. Excess flow from the Maynard-Border Stream-ditch will flow over the west bank of the channel and to the west in the south ditch of Durston Road to Cottonwood road. The Exhibit entitled Durston Flow Scheme illustrates the irrigation and runoff flow scheme at Durston Road. A list of the size and capacities of culverts at various other locations along the channel is provided below. Culvert capacity calculations are located in the Major Drainage Plan Appendix. Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch Existing Culverts and Capacities Location Size Capacity Farmer's Canal 30" CMP 39 cfs • Highway 191. 36" CMP 50 cfs Babcock Street 582@x36" RCP 99 cfs 3 of 15 H:\3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc Post Development Basin Characteristics The rational method and the City of Bozeman Storm Water Master Plan are used • to calculate the peak runoff for a given storm event. A table identifying typical runoff coefficients is included in the Minor Drainage Basin Appendix. Runoff Coefficients used in this report are: Land Use Runoff Coefficient (C) Agricultural Land 0.20 Agricultural Suburban Development 0.28 Residential (Medium Density) 0.35 Commercial Neighborhood 0.70 The Valley West Drainage Plan is primarily designed to provide public convenience and safety by accommodating frequent storm events. The return period for the minor drainage system is 10 years with the 25-year event used for perennial stream crossings at streets and the major drainage system. The ability of the major drainage system to convey larger storm events up to the 100-year event is also considered. Development increases downstream peak flow by increasing runoff volumes and decreasing times of concentrations within the basin. The minor drainage system incorporates detention ponds to detain the 10-year storm event. These ponds reduce the downstream impact to levels existing prior to creation of the • subdivision. The ponds will also provide settlement time for sediment and other pollutants to be removed. The Valley West Preliminary Drainage Plan is included in the Minor' Drainage Plan Appendix. Design takes advantage of natural features that contribute to the management of storm water. Engineering techniques preserve and enhance the natural features and processes of the site. This in turn maximizes post- development economic and environmental benefits, particularly in combination with open space and recreational uses. Our design improves the effectiveness of the natural systems, rather than negates, replaces or ignores them. The Major Drainage System The backbone of the major drainage system in the east portion of the subdivision is the Maynard-Border stream-ditch. The drainage design utilizes it's channel capacity to convey runoff generated by return periods up to 100 years without inundating structures. Culverts placed within the waterways and storm drain pipes are designed for the 25-year return period. Installing culverts to convey runoff greater than the 25-year event results in excessive culvert costs with minimal reduction in the potential for adverse consequences. The applicant's funds are better invested in site grading and specifying floor elevations for lots adjacent to waterways. Site grading is designed so that storm events between • 25 and 100 years pass over roadways or through emergency overflow areas without inundating building structures or causing significant erosion. 4of15 HA3384\003\Drainage\Va11ey West Drainage Study.doc Post development flow estimates account for existing flows within the drainage • basin as well as the effects of development in the basin. Estimating runoff for the post-development 100-year storm event is the first step. The existing basin is largely undeveloped. Future development of the basin is considered when determining the post development runoff. A limiting factor to runoff entering the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch is the Farmer's Canal. A 30" CMP conveys irrigation flow and excess runoff from the canal to the ditch. The capacity of the culvert is estimated at 39 cfs. The estimated runoff for the 100-year event in the basin at the Farmer's Canal is 65 cfs corresponding to the future agricultural suburban development. The more conservative number of 65 cfs is used to insure adequate drainage capacity to account for downstream development of the major drainage system. Existing development between the Farmer's Canal and Highway 191 consists of a residential mobile home park and some rural residential home sites. Two livestock watering ponds, that obtain water from the Maynard-Border Stream- ditch, are constructed directly north of the canal. It is unlikely that use of this property will be significantly modified in the future. The estimated runoff for the 100-year event at the crossing of Highway 191 is 67 cfs. The capacity of the existing culvert under Highway 191 is estimated at 50 cfs. This corresponds roughly to the estimated runoff for the 25-year event at this location. This culvert. significantly restricts flow to the downstream channel during the 100-year event. • Based on visual field inspections excess runoff ponds in the ditch along the south side of Highway 191. To remain conservative and account for the estimated runoff within the entire basin 67 cfs is used in analysis of the major drainage system. Future commercial development in the basin area between Highway 191 and Babcock Street is considered. Zoning in this area is Residential-Office. It is anticipated that development in this area will be held to similar design criteria required of the Valley West#1 Subdivision. Based on this assessment, the basin characteristics are modified for the post-development 100-year event as follows: @ Babcock Street Crossing: (including basin areas to the south of Highway 191) Commercial 119 acres + C 0.70 Residential 51 acres + C = 0.35 Agricultural Suburban 585 acres ± C = 0.28 Total area 755 acres + C = 0.35 Similar considerations are made for the proposed crossing of Cascade Street and existing crossing of Durston Road. Zoning in the area between Babcock Street and Durston Road is Residential (R-3). The 100-year runoff from the • Valley West Subdivision is to be routed to the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch through drainage swales and streets, as shown of the drainage plan. Based on these zoning and flood routing considerations, the basin characteristics for the post-development 100-year event are modified as follows: 'r 5 of 15 HA3 3 84\003\Drai nage\Val ley West Drainage Study.doc • Proposed Cascade Street Crossing: Commercial 119 acres + C = 0.70 Residential 79 acres + C = 0.35 Agricultural Suburban 585 acres ± C = 0.28 Total Basin Area 783 acres + C = 0.35 • Durston Road Crossing: Commercial 153 acres + C = 0.70 Residential 427 acres + C = 0.35 Agricultural Suburban 585 acres± C =.0.28 Total Basin Area 1165 acres + C = 0.36 A summary of the estimated post-development 100 - year runoffs is: Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch Outfall Q25 Q100 Durston Road Crossing 113 139 Cascade Street Crossing 76 94 • Babcock Street Crossing 76 93 Highway 191 Crossing 54 67 Farmer's Canal Crossing 52 65 The culvert to be installed at the crossing of Cascade Street is sized to pass the 25-year storm .event. The culvert sizing analysis is provided in the Major Drainage Plan Appendix. The required culvert is a 581/2"x 36" RCPA. The investigation assesses the characteristics of the Maynard-Border Stream- ditch channel to estimate the 100-year water surface elevations along the channel adjacent to the Valley West Subdivision. This is to establish minimum finished floor elevations for the lots within the subdivision. The 100-year water surface is estimated using the typical cross sections of the channel through the . Valley West property. The land use plan for Valley West Subdivision calls for a park/open space corridor along the ditch. This buffer is considered in developing estimated surface water depths along the channel. The assessment and proposed channel cross section are included in the Major Drainage Plan Appendix. The estimated water surface depth for the 100-year storm event in the Maynard- Border Stream-ditch channel through the Valley West Subdivision is 2 feet. The finished floor elevations of the properties adjacent to the open space corridor • surrounding the ditch need to be set at 3 feet above the channel bottom providing 1 foot of freeboard during the 100-year event. The grades for roadways adjacent 6 of 15 HA3 384\003\Drai nage\Val ley West Drainage Study.doc to the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch will be established to achieve these minimum elevations. The overtopping of Cascade Street during the 100-year storm event is also considered in setting minimum finished floor elevations. The culvert conveying flow in the Maynard-Border Stream-ditch across Cascade Street is sized to pass the 25-year event. Flows exceeding the 25-year event will pass over Cascade Street on the west side of the Channel. Excess runoff overflowing Cascade Street will flow to the Community Pond to be created directly west of the channel and north of Cascade St. Ferguson Avenue Drain Pipe Evaluation The Ferguson Drain is an existing ditch running along the west side of Ferguson Avenue: It is part of the Maynard-Border Drainage Basin. This ditch was constructed concurrently with the Ferguson Avenue Roadway to convey existing flow from the south to the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch at Durston Road. It also drains the extreme eastern portion of the Valley West Subdivision. This ditch will be replaced with drainage pipe with the development of the property. The exhibit entitled "Drainage Basin For Ferguson Drain" illustrates the existing basin conveying runoff to the Ferguson Drain. An existing culvert crossing under Highway 191 controls the amount of flow • entering the Ferguson Drain from south of the highway. The capacity of the culvert is 36.6 cfs based on a headwater depth of 3 feet. Field inspection of the property directly upstream from the culvert show that 3' is reasonable for the maximum headwater elevation. Analysis of the drainage basin flowing into the culvert yield the following runoff flows: Return frequency Pre-development Q Post Development Q cfs cfs 5-Year 6.7 20.8 25-Year 10 31.1 100-Year 12.3 39.2 This analysis uses a pre-development C factor of 0.20. Future development of the basin is accounted for assumingresidential development at a C factor of 0.35. The residential land use corresponds to the City of Bozeman 2020 Plan land use designation. The pre-development time of concentration is determined using Figure 22 of the City of Bozeman Storm Water Master Plan to estimate and overland flow velocity of 0.4 fps. Post development time of concentration 'is estimated using and average flow velocity of 1 fps, assuming a combination of overland and gutter flow to the culvert. As can be seen the existing culvert • capacity roughly corresponds to the estimate 25-year runoff event from the south. The capacity of the culvert will be used as a limiting factor. 7 of 15 H:\3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc The assumption is made that flow entering the pipe between Highway 191 and Babcock St. is limited to runoff from Ferguson Avenue. The grading plan for the Spring Creek Village Resort Subdivision shows flow from this property into the Ferguson Drain to be negligible. The Ferguson Avenue street area is approximately 2.3 acres. The flow will cross Babcock St. in the existing Valley Gutter and flow to an inlet in Ferguson Avenue directly north of the proposed Cascade St./Ferguson Avenue intersection. The drainage area of Ferguson Avenue to the north of Babcock St. is also considered. Using time of concentration adjustments along Ferguson Avenue the runoff at the inlets north of Cascade St. is estimated @: Return frequency Post Development Q cfs 5-Year 4 25-Year 6 100-Year 7.9 A similar calculation for the inlets at Durston Road on Ferguson Avenue yields the following: Return frequency Post Development Q cfs 5-Year 5.1 25-Year 7.7 100-Year 10.5 • Using Time of Concentration adjustments for the entire basin we calculate the runoff in the Ferguson Drain at the inlets north of Cascade Street including runoff from the Valley West Subdivision as follows: Return frequency Post Development Q cfs 5-Year 23.8 25-Year 35.7 100-Year 44.9 A similar calculation for the inlets at Durston Road on Ferguson Avenue yields the following: Return freguency Post Development Q cfs 5-Year 24.1 25-Year 36.1 100-Year 45.4 The Ferguson Drain needs to provide a flow capacity of 36.1 cfs to drain the 25- year event. The Valley West Drainage.Plan calls for a 36" CMP @ an overall slope of 1% to be installed in the Ferguson Avenue Parkway. The parkway will be owned and maintained by the Valley West Subdivision Homeowner's • Association. The capacity of the pipe is 39.3 cfs. 8 of 15 H:\3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc s • Baxter Ditch Flood Analysis • The Baxter Ditch is an existing ditch running along the west side of Cottonwood Road. This ditch was constructed concurrently with the Cottonwood Road improvements and as part of the Wetland Mitigation Plan for the Valley West Subdivision. It will be utilized to convey runoff from south of Babcock St. and portions of the Valley West Subdivision east of Cottonwood Road. As the ditch is part of an approved wetland mitigation plan is will remain an open ditch for drainage purposes. Culverts passing under Highway 191 and Cottonwood Road control flow entering the Baxter Ditch from the south. The culvert under Cottonwood Road accounts for flows passing under Highway 191 and include runoff between the highway and Babcock St. The capacity of the existing 26 5/8" x. 43 3/4' culvert under Cottonwood road will therefore be used to assess the flow in the Baxter Ditch. The capacity off the culvert is 45.3 cfs. The total area contributing to the Baxter Ditch downstream of the culvert is 56.8 acres. This includes the area within the Valley West Subdivision east of Cottonwood Road including Cottonwood Road from Babcock St. to Durston Road (49.6 acres), and the Cottonwood Road right-of-way from Highway 191 to Babcock St. (7.2 acres). • Using Time of Concentration adjustments to account for development in Valley West yields the following runoff flows generated from this contributing area. Return frequency Post Development Q cfs 5-Year 15.6 25-Year 22.7 100-Year 29.5 A conservative approach regarding the total flow in the Baxter Ditch is to neglect the Time of Concentration adjustment from the contributing area south of the 26 5/8" x 43 3/4" culvert in Cottonwood Road and add the capacity of this culvert directly to the flow from the contributing area below this culvert. This approach yields the following: Return frequency Post Development Q cfs 5-Year 60.9 25-Year. 68.1 100-Year 74.8 Using a typical cross-section and the slope of the existing Baxter Ditch channel we can estimate the capacity of the channel for varying flow depths. A flow depth in the Baxter Ditch of 2.8 ft yields a capacity of 109.81 cfs. This is • adequate to drain the Valley West Development. The finished floor elevations of the properties facing the Baxter Ditch will be set at 4.5 ft above channel bottom. 9of15 HA3 3 84\003\Drainage\Val ley West Drainage Study.doc • • Baxter Creek Flood Analysis This section evaluates the potential for flooding along Baxter Creek in the western • portions of the subdivision. The One hundred (100) year water surface elevations and the 100-year high water limits for Baxter Creek are shown on the Valley West Drainage Plan. Hydraulic calculations and the water surface profile for Baxter Creek shall take into account the upstream and downstream culvert capacities. The Valley West Subdivision Drainage does not direct flow directly to Baxter Creek. Extensive wetlands will be developed to effectively detain or retain runoff minimizing the effect on Baxter Creek. The following evaluation estimates 100-year water surface elevations and high water limits for Baxter Creek accounting for existing basin characteristics including upstream and downstream culvert capacities, and the effects of the Farmer's Canal. The evaluation considers existing conditions only. In reviewing the open space and wetland improvements surrounding Baxter Creek within the Valley West Subdivision, additional analysis of the basin is not necessary. Existing Basin Characteristics Baxter Creek originates approximately 4 miles south of Highway 191 (Huffine Lane). The drainage area south of Durston Road is approximately 1060 acres more or less. Current land uses are mainly agricultural with the exception of J.C. Billion auto plaza at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane. In order to effectively evaluate the drainage a summary of the land uses at various • locations along the Baxter Creek basin is necessary. The following provides a summary of the existing basin characteristics at several key locations along the basin. • Existing Farmer's Canal Crossing Agriculture 495 acres Total Basin Area 495 acres @ Existing Highway 191 Crossing Agriculture 528 acres Total Basin Area 528 acres • Existing Durston Road Crossing Agriculture 1,040 acres Low Density Commercial 20 acres Total Basin Area 1,060 acres The rational method and City of Bozeman.Storm Water Master Plan are used to • calculate the peak runoff for the 100-year flood event in Baxter Creek, not 10 of 15 Ha3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc i • accounting for the effects of the Farmer's Canal, existing culvert, or other manmade features along the stream. The basin characteristics to estimate runoff represent existing basin conditions. Basin characteristics to evaluate these conditions are as follows: @ Existing Farmer's Canal Crossing Agriculture 495 acres ± C = 0.20 Total Basin Area 495 acres + C = 0.20 @ Existing Highway 191 Crossing Agriculture 528 acres ± C = 0.20 Total Basin Area 528 acres + C = 0.20 @ Existing Durston Road Crossing Agriculture 1040 acres ± C = 0.20 Low Density Commercial 20 acres ± C = 0.70 • Total Basin Area 1060 acres ± C = 0.21 Calculations to estimate the pre-development 100-year runoff at each of the above locations are provided in the Appendix. A summary is shown below: Baxter Creek Stream Ditch Outfall Q 100 Farmers Canal Crossing 38 cfs Highway 191 Crossing 38 cfs Durston Road Crossing 65 cfs An examination of the characteristics of the existing Baxter Creek channel and drainage basin is an important step in evaluating the potential for flooding. The flow characteristics of the channel and existing culverts along the channel are assessed to determine their capacities. The capacities of the culverts are compared to the estimated 100-year runoff along the Channel. This comparison is used to estimate the actual flow in the channel and the water surface profile for the 100-year storm event. There are numerous manmade features, along the channel, that interrupt flood • flows within the natural basin. They include roadways, irrigation facilities, and culverts. The first major feature is the Farmers Canal. This irrigation. canal intercepts runoff draining from 495 acres to the south. Runoff flows directly into the canal or ponds on the south side of the canal. A portion of the water flowing 11 of 15 HA3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc in Baxter Creek to the north is diverted from the canal. The Farmer's Canal Company can also use the creek as a blow-off at any time. A diversion allows flow to be conveyed from the canal into Baxter Creek through a 30" CMP culvert. The capacity of the 30" pipe is estimated at 39 cfs (see Appendix). Other considerations include steam modifications between the Farmer's Canal and Highway 191. Baxter Creek flows through three ponds constructed in line with the channel. These ponds will effectively act to detain a significant amount of runoff during large storm events. A limiting characteristic to the flow in Baxter Creek is the crossing of Highway 191. Baxter Creek crosses Highway 191 through a 54" CMP culvert. Water flows through this culvert until the headwater reaches a depth two feet above the top of pipe. Excess water flows in a roadside drainage ditch into adjacent fields or through a 21" CMP culvert crossing under Highway 191 approximately 830 feet to the west. The flow crossing through the 21" culvert eventually re-enters Baxter Creek on the north side of Highway 191. Under extreme conditions these culverts act to limit the flow crossing Highway 191 and into Baxter Creek where it crosses Valley West Subdivision. The capacity of these culverts is determined using information from the Montana Department of Transportation and onsite inspection. Culvert capacity calculations are included with this report (see Appendix). The capacity of the .54" culvert is 150 cfs with a headwater elevation 2 feet above the top of pipe. The capacity of • the 21" culvert is 15 cfs. The total capacity of the piping under Highway 191 is 165 cfs. Flow in Baxter Creek is conveyed under Durston Road by a 54" CMP culvert. The capacity of this culvert is estimated at 150 cfs. Excess flow ponds on the south side of Durston road in a natural wetland area to be primarily located within the boundary of Bronken Park. v Estimating 100-year runoff in Baxter Creek through Valley West Subdivision An estimation of the 100-year event in Baxter Creek must account for the various constraints and characteristics of the existing channel. When accounting for the effects related to the Farmer's Canal and the constraints associated with the culverts crossing of Highway 191, it is reasonable to assume that during the 100- year event, flow to the north of the highway will be limited to the capacity of the culverts. The capacity of the culverts is estimated at 165 cfs. Our analysis of the 100-year runoff at this location is 39 cfs,..not accounting for the potential of an emergency discharge from the Farmer's Canal. The capacity of the discharge pipe that diverts water from the Farmer's Canal into Baxter Creek is estimated at 39 cfs. Comparing these potential flows, the 165 cfs capacity of the culverts crossing Highway 191, represents an over-conservative estimate for the total • flow at this location. 12 of 15 HA3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc ' Based on the existing channel characteristics, the 100-year runoff in Baxter • Creek, at Highway 191, is estimated to be 39 cfs. The capacity of the culvert that diverts water from the Farmer's Canal is also 39 cfs. Combining these flows results in an estimated 100-year runoff of 78 cfs at Highway 191. This represents a conservative estimate in that the effects of the ponds to the south of the highway are not considered. These ponds will effectively act to detain runoff during significant flooding and reduce the flow in the steam. To obtain the estimated 100-year event at Durston Road, runoff from the contributing area between Highway 191 and Durston Road is added to the estimated flow at Highway 191. Accounting for time of concentration adjustments between Highway 191 and Durston Road, the estimated runoff for the 100-year event from this contributing area is 36 cfs. Based on the above assumptions, the total estimated 100-year runoff at Durston . Road is 114 cfs. This flow is used to estimate the 100-year water surface elevations and 100-year high water limits for the existing Baxter Creek basin. Calculations to estimate the 100-year water surface elevation at various locations along the channel are in the Appendix. The estimated 100-year water surface limits are illustrated on the Final Plat. MINOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM • The Valley West Subdivision is divided into 4 Drainage Areas for evaluation of the minor drainage system. The 4 drainage areas are illustrated on the Valley West Drainage Plan. Detailed minor drainage plans for each of the 4 areas are also provided. The minor drainage systems for the Valley West Subdivision are made up of streets with curb & gutter, drainage swales, inlets, valley gutters, and detention ponds. Runoff is collected in the streets and drainage swales, transported to detention ponds, and then released to the receiving channel or facility. The ponds are less than 1.5' deep and designed so that the visual impact to the surrounding area is minimal. The ponds detain the 10-year post-development runoff volume. Runoff is released from the detention basin at a rate equal to or less than the pre-development rate for the 10-year storm event. During larger storm events site grading provides a designated path to convey runoff from the developed areas without inundating structures and minimizing erosion to the channel. Drainage Area 1 consists of seven minor drainage basins located east of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. The eastern portion of this area drains to the Ferguson Drain. The western portion drains to the Maynard-Border Stream Ditch. Detention facilities are located on park areas to be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. Retention ponds will be used to retain flow • from existing inlets along Babcock St. The detention and retention facilities are illustrated on the "Drainage Area 1 — Minor Drainage System." 13 of 15 HA3 3 84\003\Drai nage\Val ley West Drainage Study.doc Drainage Area 2 consists of eight minor drainage basins located between the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch and the Baxter Ditch. The eastern portion of this • area drains to the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. The western portion drains to the Baxter Ditch. Detention facilities are located on park areas to be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. Retention ponds will be used to retain flow from existing inlets along Babcock St. _ The detention and retention facilities are illustrated on the "Drainage Area 2 — Minor Drainage System." Drainage Area 3 consists of six minor drainage basins located between the Baxter Ditch and Baxter Creek. The majority of this area drains to the wetlands to be created adjacent to Baxter Creek. The wetlands will effectively detain the runoff prior to discharge into Baxter Creek. Collection and discharge locations are illustrated on the "Drainage Area 3 — Minor Drainage System." Drainage Area 4 consists of six minor drainage basins located west of Baxter Creek. The majority of this area drains to Adjacker Creek located just east of the property. The eastern portion drains to the Baxter Creek. The majority of this area drains to the lake .to be create with the development. The lake will effectively detain the runoff prior to discharge into the receiving stream. Collection and discharge locations along with detention facilities are illustrated on the "Drainage Area 4 — Minor Drainage System." Inlet locations are an important aspect of the minor drainage plan. Inlets will be located to limit the spread of water in the street and curb and gutter to allow for • one 12' travel lane during the 10-year event. City of Bozeman Standard inlets, chases, and/or detention pond outlet structures will be utilized. The capacity of the inlets must be considered to insure an adequate number are provided to drain the area. Inlets will be placed at the approximate locations shown on the drainage plan to handle the anticipated 1.0-year event runoff for the subdivision. Storm drain piping is used where necessary to carry flows from inlet locations to the detention basins. Detention pond and inlet piping will be sized to carry the 10-year runoff events as determined in this report. Major drainage ways and pipes will be sized to accommodate 25-year runoff events. The Storm Water Maintenance Plan The maintenance of the onsite storm water collection, detention and discharge release facilities will be integrated as part of the duties of City of Bozeman maintenance personnel responsible for storm drainage facilities. Duties shall include routine inspection to ensure that debris, yard waste, and seasonal ice does not impede operation of the detention ponds and discharge structures. It is recommended that these inspections occur after major runoff events and on a monthly basis throughout the year. • Detention ponds located within open space/parks owned by the Valley West Homeowners Association will be mowed as part of the regular ground 14 of 15 HA3 3 84\003\Dra inage\Val ley West Drainage Study.doc �► # maintenance for the park facility. The City of Bozeman parks ground maintenance crews will maintain detention ponds within. parks dedicated to the • City of Bozeman. Detention ponds shall.be mowed on a regular basis during the growing season and be maintained free of vegetation that might impede their storage capacity by the homeowner's association. 15'of 15 H:\3384\003\Drainage\Valley West Drainage Study.doc To GALLATIN fi iTo GAUATiN /v A t A 7•�►a RIVER .;�" y ; K. ..•:,., : �. r t ti W cc t T SPRING 'mA. ✓r. 1� ` xI1 ti cr � t ` i1�� `' •i'I ��4 VLF ` Y L1J Z �, A\ ' .r 0: w z Q p ` >' Q a, 0 I' r ' F_ Er -`<•. L F S b _ Rohn F FARMER�s VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION MAJOR DRAINAGE COURSES IN ASSOCIATION WITH: 1�4 sec. sEcnON TOwNSHiP RANGE - gMORIRISON PIK U G H MAIERLE,I C. 0 100 200 400 B N O N PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA aspen CLIENT, GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA SCALE:1•=200 enterprises,LLc. gloomPLOTTED DAIS Nrn/16/2001 NS Dnawirp Has Bem Rem 171C�A M�Snaf W,vwuq MI•Sgt,s FlE1D WORK•KSS DATE 10/15/01 DRAINING NAME (I DRAWN: SCALE:l:M200' ,t\3381\002VCAD\Ed*IIW SIINUM.\WER Aq -- CHECKED 9Y•PF PRg1 t 3384.002 I SHEET I OF 1 S DRAINAGE BASIN FOR FERGUSON DRAIN 1� Aunos •• •,• • •_— — Il ------ I i y Y -- __- _ -- —_�• ��• - `----• _• 1 I o _ _ I _ (0 of ---- ,I � • � o ��— FER N„ D AIN + h ? ud� o i, -1 •i LEGEND P I j H i I r F FLOW DIRECTION L W :L-- - IGHWA 191 CR NG� a ASIN A =" j!I-ACRES h �l Q � i•� f` , 0 � u w CC v I VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION DRAINAGE BASIN FOR FERGUSON RAIN • AIMAIERLE.INC. MORRISON '/° G ��°" TDWNS,P RAN(E ' s�m m••r•r d a•an.wr pep a® it — PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA 0___S00 1000 7000 (7.IFNT:ASP_EN_.—, GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA FIELD WORK DATE 10/15/01 PLOTTED DATE Nov/16/2001 SCALE:1'=1000' DRAWING NAME DRAWN BY' GS SCALE:1'=1000' k\1184\OWV4rA0\WAK4CE\FBOSMMtWUM (ms Drawing Has Been Reduced) CHECKED BYLOL—I PROD SHEET 1 OF 1 . h S DRAINAGE BASIN FOR EXHIBIT 1 • MAYNARD - BOARDER STREAM DITCH ----I Hums CP 4 — — — — — — — i`Y 1 1 v a rV o� t ' -- -- - - -- -- ------o ----- ----- r---- - � .,, VER FLOW o ��• N CH NNELI OW ' I . .. _ ------ !I a -- ti®----- � ----- ------- II It O / Z�1 ! — DRAINAGE BOUNDARY SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY I I ' i I "� F FLOW DIRECTION ? ! VAL EY W 0Lo T — • M R'S NAL CR SSINQ Zg, BA N AREA ,= 585 CREST I ~ IG WAY 1 CRO ING I I �a I ti — i -- - — I — B COCK ROS IN • �. +fl BA IN A — AGR S of I CAS DE ST ROSS G I t I v BASI. AREA- = 7 ACR h IIt I W —— DURSTO R AD CR SSING +• t0" .is e 1� i � c�E u MORRISON SCDfrM SUREVM 1 MAIERLE,INC. sum 1%5 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 PA 9a 110 mf TdcbO B,1 U®M 10 97/1 -0/!+ F�(1�)Sis-IIA RENSON 90N DATE 9p REN90N DATE: t DRAM8Y:TJG DATE:01/27/00 1 moh-£0001L CMECKM BY: CJS DRAN4IG NO.: EI(l98171.DMG H:N 2885\009\acad\exhibits\EXHIBIT1.dwg Nov/06/2001 SHEET I OF .IM NO.: 4BB5.009 0310 1 , DRAINAGE BASIN FOR EXHIBIT 1 +! - BAXTER , CREEK _ _ -: ...°e•.••- .. L�•,__ II 1II Q • -- - ii � N o h . i r� ! 1 i iA ER CRE A NAGE BASI OVE AND FL D1� v " - er h p � h ' z C Lo EXIS PONDS NSTRU ED - T NEL FLO r IN AXTER CRE K CHA r NOT` E) I 1\ 1 RMER' CANAL ROS ING ' 03. SIN AFIFA = 49 AC ES BASIN AR = 1 10 0 ACRE SQ •• ••• ° 1 h oD • a �� �I EXI TI I3, RME AL Oi/ LOW 1 HIG WA 19 CR SS N.0 I- BAS EA==_5 8,� --- -- -- - I i 654 1 MORRISON scoam SURVEIM MAIERLE,iNc. GRAPHIC SCALE I PA an tta ml T•ftdt0 B11 ftmI G 997/1•Plm:(gym)274it! �(00�-nTe m e em m m REVI90N DATE REVISION DATE: DRAWN BY:TJG DATE 01/27/00 H:\2885\010\dwg\EXHIBITI—Baxter floodplain.dwg Nov/06/2001 CHEOln BY: Gs DRAWING N0: EXHBnI.DWG JOB NO.: 2W5.009 040 0310 SHEET 1 or I I DRAINAGE PLAN INDEX SHEET i DRAINAGE AREA 4 PAGE 5/5 E7: L iI I DRAINAGE �EA�j RAP E AREA 2 w DRAINAGE REA 1 AGE p E �', AGE _ �-� j u e yam- -- — LEGEND: DRAINAGE PLAN INDEX SHEET DRAINAGE AREA �]MORRISQN BOUNDARY 1/4sec. N roWNSHIP RANGE MORLE,iNc. r1ma rr.aon•ir. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA S 25�O CLIENT:ASPEN GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA PLOTTED DATE: Nov/15/2001 SCALE:1'=250' FIELD WORK• DATE:10/25/01 DRAWING N AE a Nov/111 (this DmMng Hes Been Reduced) DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:1'=100' �_I�, . CHECKED BY.CS PRO)&3384.003 SHEET 1 OF 5 FUTURE DURSTON DISCHARGE TO ROAD STORM DRAIN EXISTING DRAINAGE EXISTING CULVERT DETENTION POND FUTURE CONNECT TO DURSTON SO SOUTH INV. VOLUME= 8175 CF APPROX. INVERT=4757.5 T"`.T?T f i //,r/,J l rj. 1 n 5T•'j�.f-�:�.f,. NOTE: FINAL POND PLACEMENT IN MINOR BASIN ; 36" CMP STORM DRAIN WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON ROAD LAYOUT AS EACH PARCEL IS DEVELOPED{ MANHOLE •W/ GRATE INLET TAI AG 4REA 2 T RE IN3A i A R 6.4 AC. HERITAGE CHRISTIAN x 36" CMP STORM DRAIN SCHOOL MANHOLE RCP STORM DRAIN J DETENTION POND -— - �6OLL7 _ rya VOLUME=1250 CF ' _ �°_�"__ _ I'LL 1 I } MANHOLE W/ GRATE INLET `VOWME0 i oCF 36" CMP STORM DRAIN DRAINAGE AREA 2 r FERGUSON DRAINAGE MINOR BASIN 36 ` ! a '' '�' A,. �,IN THIS-'AREA=�WILL BE BASIN Te INLET AT / TOTAL AREA=3.9 AC. D - EMI UPON SPECIFIC'ROAD DuRsroN TOTAL E PROVIDED IN THE AREA=3.9 AC. 'PLAT SUBMITTAL DETENTION POND VOLUME=4075 CF r MANHOLE W/ GRATE INLET DRAINAGE AREA I S B Otis +� APPROX. BOT. EL. 4770.5 v, MINOR BASIN 4 �e''',t - APPROX. INVERT=4768.7 TOTAL AREA=3.0 AC. „ 36" CMP STORM DRAIN DRAINAGE AREA 1 \ MINOR BASIN 8 _ TOTAL AREA= �:. � MANHOLE \ _ _.� 14.5 AC. DETENTKw rorro RCP STORM DRAIN CF a °� --GASGADESTR€€- rl'OL"1-1000i - -DE-TENT POND VOLUME 450 CF MANHOLE W/ GRATE INLET y 36" CMP STORM DRAIN 4 DETENTI N POND VOLUMEz=1 125 CF' c NEL.=477 PPROX. OTTOM! MANHOLE W/ GRATE INLET APPROX. INV. EL.=4775.9 DRAINAGE AREA 2 MINOR BASIN 2 ` OTAL AREA= 11.0 AC. DRAINAGE AREA 1 c DRAINAGE EA 1 MANHOLE MINOR BASIN 3 MINOR B N 5 TOTAL AREA=9.2 AC. TOTAL AREA= 1 .4 AC. MANHOLE W/ GRATE INLET FERGUSON DRAINAGE BASIN TO 0.6% Q_%% am )► -49 094Y __ INLET NORTH OF CASCADE __— .. - - - ---- -- ---- TOTAL AREA=3.7 AC. 4' DETENTION POND VOLUME=1825 CF 36" CMP DETENTION POND VOLUME=1200 CF a MANHOLE DRAINAGEc,AneA 1 ._A __ MINOR BASIN 1 A o RCP STORM DRAIN a TOTALFa AR =0.7 AC- MANHOLE ° X k 000, Cal Q i Qo = WEST BABCOCK STREET z Cr F- (MAJOR ARTERIAL) MIND BASIN I Q — MINOR BASIN 2 m TOTAL AREA=0.9 AC. DRAINAGE AREA 1 Li Q L=G:ND: MINOR BASIN SYSTEM MINOR BASIN BOUNDARY 4MORRISON 1/4 SEC. I SECTION TOWNSHIP I RANCE 0.65% ]► PRELIMINARY ROAD GRADE MAIERMINC. a,w ---� VALLEY GUTTER 0 50 100 200 b11j� ~ar o...n sm•w�Tcp PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA mm� CLIENT:ASPEN GALLATIN COUNTY STORM DRAIN PIPE SCALE:1'=100 FIELD WORK DATE:10/25/01 DRAWING NAME:Nov/15/2001 (This DrewinO Has Been Reduced) DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:1'=1000 u _'_Ela en.a.4 CHECKED BY:GS PROJ#:: 384.003 SHEET 2 OF 5 URSTON OAD _ (MAJOR ARTERIAL) PRIVATE OWNERSHIP NOTE: FINAL POND PLACEMENT II WILL BE DETERMINED BASED ON 7 JL16-0�' 18* VE18• ON POND UI 4755' E-3400 CF AS EACH PARCEL X 55.9 ' y - - -DRAIIIIAG AREA ,- I RIN3A - - - ---- ---- _ N -TOTAL A R 6.4AC. HERITAGE CHRIST NfgN POND uME�sa00 SCHOOL TOP aF,B•PIPE AP z.) 'L TBI:EL.-476B.3 c DETENTION POND -44 1- _ i ` osx VOLUME=1250 CF D AGEAREA� __ .__ _. _ _ --' MI R BASIN R TOTAL EA= 12.9 AC DErEN1WN POND VOLUME-2200 CF R DRAINAGE AREA 2 - MINOR BASIN 3B NOTE: DRAINAGE E TOTAL AREA= 3.9 AC. LAYOUT 1 u PRELIMIN, I DRAINAGE AREA 1 FOR PHA MINOR BASIN 4 TOTAL AREA-3 0 AC —�[ 057%-- -."[ 06%. -[ 0.5% I DR I AG REA,` MI R IN TOTAL _ m TOP O<24-PIPE EL.-4770.E 1 reO EL-4771s % VOLUME-200ON 000NF - DETENTION 24 INv-ase. VOLUME=2 140 OF 24• DE��-65W CF �y N POND 74'AT 0.4x: VOLUMEBOTTOM ELEVATION-4769.0 DRAINAGE AREA 2 � MINOR BASIN 6 -,j"`•� '�, TOTAL AREA=9.6 AC. 71► DRAINAGE AREA 2 DRAIN G AREA 2 MINOR BASIN 2 9 MIND ASIN 5 TOTAL AREA= 1 .0 AG, iG$ I TOTAL =3.2 AC. _. . .- is DRAI I TOTAL f _ � I _ Di'.�INAGE.ARF.A`, _ _:_ VOLUM DETENTION - y-�,, - _- � . � VOLUME=. MINOR BASIN 1 DETENTION POND TOTAL AREA= °a AC. VOLUME=1200 CF , DRAINAGE 1 MINOR DRAINAGE AREA 2 MINOR BASIN IN 1 TOTALAREA= 2.3AC. MINOR BASIN SYSTEM LEGEND: �MORRISON 1/4 SEC-I SECTION TOWNSHIP I RANCE L i•,c. MINOR BASIN BOUNDARY MAIERL m,,,, r Hym m��u. ias( re( m-gym PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA 0.65% 7► PRELIMINARY ROAD GRADE 0 50 100 200 CLIENT: GALLATIP COUNTY PLOTTED ]ATE: Nov/15/2001 VALLEY GUTTER SCALP:1=100 FIELD WORK DATE:10/25/O1 DRAWING 4AME: STORM DRAIN PIPE 0>'19 DreMV H8 Been Raa,oa) DRAWN BY: SCALE: I•=I OO' H:\]384\OURAGD\ORNNAGE\ CHECKED BY: PROD 3384.003 SHEETczHe34.g 5 IF SHEET-OF SOCCER FIELDS IN-a 4755.9 E2D E2D D ON POND LUME 5000 CF TOP OF 18-PIPE AP RO%.) EL_4757 TBC EL-47_E.3 DISCHARGE DIRECTLY TO WETLAND - REQUIRED DETENTION POND SIZE_4725 CF 1 DR I AGE AREA 2 1 MI R BASIN B To-AL EA= 12.9 AC DRAINAGE AREA 3 MINOR BASIN 3 TOTAL AREA=9.9 AC. DISCHARGE DIRECTLY TO WETLAND REQUIRED DETENTION POND S1ZE-4375 CF ,, t I — D I AG MI R 11 TOTAL E TOP OF 24'PIPE XJ _ EL-4770.6 DRAINAGE AREA 3 TBC 8L 4771.5 MINOR BASIN 2 t TOTAL AREA= 16.3 AC. i / 24•INV_476E. 140'OF 24' DE 74•AT 0.4R � 01-CRIRGE DIRE Y TO WETLAND 0 REQUIRED D ON POND 1 m SI 6050 CF 1 \ L I I DRAINAG AREA 2 i MINOR ASIN 5 t TOTAL A = 3.2 AC. DRAINAGE AREA 3 - MINOR BASIN I TOTAL AREA= 18.2 AC. 0.5% -40[ 0.5% 1.00% ]►, �[ 0.6% ' TO I w w = w w U Ir Ir U U Q 0 Ir Ir D= cr Lu w X w xx Q � Q m m m o= DRAINAGE R EA 3 LEGEND: MINOR BASIN SYSTEM MINOR BASIN BOUNDARY MORRISON /4 SEC SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE MAIERLE,INc. 0.65% 701. PRELIMINARY ROAD GRADE —- PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN.MONTANA --�' VALLEY GUTTER 0 50 100 200 CLIENT: COUNTY PLOTTED DATE: Nov/15/2001 FIELD WORK DATE:10/25/O1 DRAWING NAME: STORM DRAIN PIPE SCALE:1'=10(Y DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:I-=100• R.\3 \006\AM\O% WCE\ (This DraWng Hes Been Retl� CHECKED BY,CS PROJ :3384.003 S ETEsutfi 4.e.y0, 5 DURSTON ROAD (MAJOR ARTERIAL) IE,IJ0101� CF.a„E_�tp ff oET mm Pd10 VOUAIE 340D a DRAINAGE AREA 4 mvmat PM MINOR BASIN 3 %MUXE 17MCF DRAINAGE AREA 4 ' TOTAL AREA=9.2 AC. MINOR BASIN 6 •,� j K TOTAL AREA=6.5 AC. CF _ r - - - - - � DRAINAGE AREA W MINOR BASIN 1 AREA=3.2 �•1 �1 $ � i x x DRAjNAc kREA 4 DRAINAGE f _ ;y MINOR IN v MINOR B w TOTAL ARM= 15.2 AC. A TOTAL AREA C. ,;,1 VIVEM N FM f DRAINAGE AREA 4 MINOR BASIN 4 ` TOTAL AREA=6.3 AC DRAINAGE AREA 4 ( LEGEND: I�L MINOR BASIN SYSTEM MINOR BASIN BOUNDARY r� IMORRISON ® '/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE I 1�1 II gym 0.66% 7► PRELIMINARY ROAD GRADE 0 50 100 200 MAI RLE,INC. �� roaarrti�t�.amn-r sm, ,k taoao-�a PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MDNTANA CLIENT:ASPEN GALLATIN COUNTY.MONTANA VALLEY GUTTER SCALE:1'=100' PLOTTED DATES: Nov/1$/2001 (Otis Drawl g Has Been Redwed) FIELD WORK- DATE 10/25/01 DRA;[No STORM DRAIN PIPE DRAWN BY: KSS scAIF:''='00' wu_,�1w,ee,a.y CHECKED BY-CS PRg1 B-3384.003 SZ 5 OF $ 12 • PRELIMINAW PLAT OF VALLEY WEST SUBDIVIS N-PHASE ##1 . OF THE VALLEY WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN BLOCK 1,PORTIONS OF TRACT 1,2&3 OF VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH WEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 10,T 2 S,R 5 E,P.M.M.,GALLATIN COUNTY,CITY OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA I I.the undersigned signed Thomas H.Henesn,Registered Land Surveyo,do Denby certify between and .I surveyed Valley (I), (We), the undersigned property owner(s), do hereby certify West Subdivision Phase it.and plotted here some as shown he theMa ton.accompanying that (1). (We), have caused to be surveyed, subdivided and platted I Dual and as describedPlatting in accordance with the provisions of the Montana into lots, blocks, streets. and alleys. and other divisions and APPLICANT OWNERS PURPOSE Subdivision ontl Platting visi Sections 76-3-101 through 78-3-625.M.C.A..and dedications. as shown by the plot hereunto included. the following CREATE A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD the Bozeman Arco Subdivision Regulations. described tract of land, to it: BOZEMAN LAKES L.L.C. VALLEY WEST L.L.C. DEVELOPMENT FOR MIXED DENSITY Dated this—day of ,2001 C/O DOUG OBERG C/O GERALD WING HOUSING. Commencing at the south east corner of Tract 1 of Block 1 of 2415 E. CAMEL&1CK. SUITE 900 1240 13ENNM LANE Valley West Subdivision in the south half of the north west one PHOENIX, AZ 85016 CALISTOGA,CA 94515 quarter of Section 10.Township 2 South, Range 5 East. P.M.M., Thomas M.Henesh Gallatin County, Montano to the True Point of Beginning; 010062 LS Thence along the South line of Tracts 1, 2, and 3 of Block f of ' Volley West Subdivision, North 89'51'58"West o distance of 2257.46 feet: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION Thence North O'OS'02" East a distance of 570 feel: 1. and I:Gregory J.Stratton,a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the Stale of Monlono,do hereby certify that Thence South 89'51'58"East a distance of 819.95 feet to the the following improvements.required asna condition()of approval of Valley beginning of a curve to the left; West Subdivision Phose In how been stalled in conformance with the 9' 9 approved plans and specifications. The subdivider hereby warrants against defects in these improvements far a period of one year from this date. The Thence along said curve having a chord bearing of North ��- subdivide,grants possession of all public infrastructure improvements to the 78'45'59"East,and a chord distance of 202.68 feel, through a e,7 easlss ion S City of Bozeman.and the City hereby accepts possession of all public central angle an arc distance of 203.89 feet to a Infrastructure Improvements,suDJttt to the above Indicated warranty. non-tangent curve to to the tell; Thence along said non-tongent curve having a chord bearing of North 23'47'18"West, and a chord distance of 221.24 feel, I II oug erg Dated through a central angle of 24*05*40", an arc distance of 222.88 Bozeman Lakes L.L.C. feet;� � I °+ --- Debra H.Arkd1 Doted Thence North 35*50*08'West a distance of 109.19 feet to the Director of Public Service beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left; Thence along said non-tangent curve having o chord bearing of I I J I I _ Gregory J.Stratton,p9933PE Dated North 09'09'52'East, and o chord distance of 32.69 feet, I I \!g v I I r Morrison-Muierle.Inc. through a central ongle of 31'04'54 an are distance of 33.09 feet; I I I I I I r l k � Thence North 54*09'52"East a distance of 153.29 feet to a I mrro I I ' I oyms<a«ro ' I ` 3 faro ) CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER curve to the beginning of a curve to the right; \ I.Anna Rosenberry,Treasurer of Gallatin County,Montano,do hereby certify Thence along said curve having a chord bearing of South PRgJECT that the accompanying plot has been duly exarnlned and that oil real 7705*50"West.and a chord distance of 166,26 feet. through a / - property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied an the land to central angle of 35'51'54 on arc distance of 169.01 feet; REA l be subdivided we paid. Thence South 8T58'13"East a distance of 40.15 feet; l Dated this day of A.D..2001 Thence South,00'08'02'West a distance of 504.43 feel; Thence-South 89*51*58 East a distance of 770 feet: Anno Rosenberry 1 Treasurer of Gallatin County Thence South 00'08'02"West a distance of 160 feet; Thence South 8T51'58"East a distance of 297.63 feet to a • point on the eastern boundary line of Tract 1 of Block 1 of Volley West Subdivision; I I � CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE Thence along said eastern boundary line of Tract 1 South 6 ❑ �'� as mm. 1.Debra H.Arkd1,Director of Public Service.City of Bozeman,Montano,do 00'28'18"West a distance of 410.01 feet to the True Point ofe hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been duly examined and has Beginning. w � 1 — found the some to conform to the low,approves I. and hereby accepts the dedication to the City of Bozeman far the public use of any and all lands The above described tract of fond is to be known and designated shown on the plat as being dedicated to such use. i-1 � as Volley West Subdivision Phase #I, City of Bozeman, Gallatin I Doted this doy of AD.,2001 County, Montana; and the lands included in all streets, avenues. alleys and parks or public squares shown on said plot are hereby granted and donated to the City of Bozeman for the public use and enjoyment. Debra H.Arkdl I \ i I �/� i Director of Public SeMce By. Dated City of Bozeman.Montana I RELEASE OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS STATE OF ) :sA I � � The Valley West Subdivision Phase r,Gallatin County,Montano.is within the COUNTY OF ) � I i I l ' I i l ( City of Bozeman.Montano Master Plan area and can be provided with -F , municipal facilities for the supply of woler and disposal of seroge and solid On this—day o! ,20_,before me / 1 waste. therefore,under the provisions of Section 76-4-124(1),M.C.A,this (Notary) personally appeared I I _ _ _- �_ 4 wlwiasion is not subject to sanitary restrictions. �� Doted this doy o/ AD..2001 known to me to be the of the corporation that executed the it within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed ®VICINITY MAP the some. (1-5-101, 1-5-102. 1-5-203.MCA). ell ^TORT„ NO SCALE Dirreeciw of Puublic Service Notary Public for the State of Montana. City of Bozeman.Montana residing at Montano. My commission expires CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER L Shelley Vance.Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County.Montano.do CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE(S) hereby certify that the foregoing Instrument was filed inmy office (1).(We).the undersigned mortgagee(s)or encumbrancer.do hereby join in and at o'clock.recorded in D.k this—day la consent Lo the described plat.releasing(m)(our)respttlive IiMA da'ans or A.D..2001,and receded in Book of Plain c Page—. (Doc.No. )Records of lire perk and Recorder. 9 Y �1 Gollotin County.Montana. encumbrances as to any portion of said lands now being platted into streets. avenues,parks or other pudic uses which are dedicated to the City of Bozeman for the public use and enjoyment. Shelley Vance Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County By. Doted STATE OF ) IN ASSOCIATION WITH': ss. y COUNTY OF ) '' On lhis_doy o! . 20_,before me a F • (Notary) personally appeared aspen known to me to be the of the corporation that executed the 1l m® 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE within instrument,and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed enterprises,1.1.("i. MORRISON �' the some. (1-5-101. 1-5-102. 1-5-203, MCA). - MAIERLE,[NC. Nwl a 10 2 S 5 E RUGH �..,ti.RL ,IN :Qas r nu m na.y as e>®.n son. fag so-mn r:la0 a-nw PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA Notary Public for the Stole of Montana. ENO V Cg1EN1;ASPEN ENTERPRISES GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA 10/15/Ol TE: Nov/16/2001 residing at Montana. PLOTTED DA rn vlmRww ..v�soma DRAWING NAME: My commission expiresFIELD ow N DRAWN BY: YK TODD SCALE: H:\3394\lXU\ICJ41\PPbt\PPMIPb!-co.er.d.g CHECKED BY-CJS PROJ NTS 3384 .003 SHEET 1 OF 2 PRELIMINAWY PLAT OF VALLEY WEST SUBDIVI N-PHASE #1 APPLICANT OWNERS OF THE VALLEY WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURPOSE BOZEMAN (AXES L.L.C. VALLEY WEST L.L.C. LOCATED IN BLOCK 1,PORTIONS OF TRACT 1,2&3 OF VALLEY WEST SUBDMSION CREATE A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD C/o DOUG OBERG C/O GERALD WING A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH WEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 10,T 2 S,R 5 E,P.M.M.,CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA DEVELOP FOR MIXED DENSITY 2415 E. CAME 5016 SUDS 900 CAU OGA,SEN CT 945E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , PHOENIX,AZ 85016 CAUSTOG0. CA 94515 :I ,I � ! �\ •� �� — — — — -- — = -- -� � .-- -----_�—o�s�1•�'ro 5' i CASCADE srnseT,- - - It 40 t,I ` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �C�N0909'SYE '-- - 0 32.62L A775- - - 1 I 1 - l _ J \ ' 10'EXISTING UTILITY% `� ` ------- /SANITARY SEWER 70 BE � I GRAPHIC SCARE 120'IR/W� / - ^ AID^ I -- 10'.EXISTING UTILITY Yi- b + EASEMENT ` EXTENDED TO EXISTING -- �� I -! -LL4_ I R=530.00' EASEMENT �i L ,( i `� 5f L"'-G, ---_ 8'MAIN IN DURSTON RD. •.60' - vAU•�NL¢ y i" �� L Jaen.10D IL i' 60' GN '�ppL "'NG/o jomiv�yS ,% I L=222.88' _ .`tJ; 7 , d vxlb'•w[51 y�ru .. - / °so'��. f I �;qy (/ f j• vN1 M,A Of r-+ti IS PAGE HAS BEEN REDUCED Iz� Il ->ns` CB=N23 4T18"W ,�9i��B. rk 4 3 : +ice�H 5i5 - / y j '� (TM ) GRWG F3 \ / S. I 1 `}_ t.., "-ppr RJ / ( I I LOT d z \ CD=221.24' I. } k o - 688 zONB� '/ /I 1• I >„ri - - EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK&DITCH MAINTENANCE Y i- 1 •I /� �._. _ - EASEMENT,35'FROM ORDINARY WATER MARK r '-- ` r 4t to S' IVI; D Rnv L07 5 1 E.xIST,t:G STORM:NAIER,!k_i i R=203.89' ..�" L=203.69' \ 1) ' 1 EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK& I I U1I.ITY EASE'fEM'r -- - _ / - '` a il. ^DITCH MAINTENANCE L • ` `1 __ 1f D=21'3800" I ' ..:. CB=N78'45'59 E. FROMMORDINARY- / I { L07�� .1�: , Ir175a' . I� k HIGH�1 AiER MARK PHASE 1 BOUNDARY • �l� �'_- _'�4Q0�'�, V o>t=r�mlvlirffit�CD=202.68' r 1 f �r o, j 20'R/W m=Ua.81' .e0.� 1 } A 20'R/W J i e LOT 7 I 58751'S8"E 819.95' - >I• j3 y 1 i - - S89'S1'58"E 770.00' _ _ - II z _ _ I - - - ALLEY-2- I ^..I - ALLEY-0 1 TaW- , . - o ' �L~'9:" �L 4,r , -+' , .{.-, IL4l. f, R .-�II ' U I LOT 1 e UTI /ABC 5 E u I Y n F LOT 18 P I rux-s.I f` 2 8,1 Un e5 __r Im 70 C _ t 1 iLo w a xosAIw n - �aao w a am w a I t n $' r 3 a F- I 444444 gg t t0T 88 kDf 67 4 lDT 8E IDT 89 g I I I m.ti7aa�a S69'S1'S8'E'297.63' 1. •;1 I � I, �°,a0 _ - _� -o - �'. - 5 IIIT. 8 LOT ,_ • �, 3l DP /A SSE ME taT33 �� Aim __- II, �e e e e t e I �e .e $e _ 'It rmo w a a 4 f?oy x. r S `'- '- o t B 1---+$ Im Go TOT 61 $ $$ lar.n B 9� R 3$ 4 s �s nil T i S suoo a s _ �_ '\ygo v am w a _ I a $ 3 �� 3 's$ 9 'sQ 9$ 4 3� Ei a / r ,' �II_ .�- - mo .$r®i 9 • d i d 7JLaw ID w a,$ -� o I l ` y o -�- o G{RALO I/ t5 - _ - - _l> I1 S EAM / �- - � _�_R� .-NO.MT -58951'S8'1:gam_ - -a�, C/ gfN- 9! D r ���`Y� - ALLEYS t / 12a�mfA�1 J A7 - t .� - - HID 8 t c � I 1 30'UTILITY Afl U /A E ME lOr so , lOr ss 1 /CCESS4.0 ZOKI �,2 2 2 ":''.; 2 )� a f k ( } o"rLm w 111 j ,. EASEMENTl s s� s 9$ { t a TOT kOr_5s ^ LOT 73 B G 7J 1 6_S ar�o a nno a uw a s T"j l0T 52 i moo a a 1 y'I ,� {: - '- f 0 LITY/ACCESS _785�_- -r00 - IOOm' I l� i a (. •.4 1Tjn'`�..`�'tt I 1 ASEMENT — - - -- - — 9 -. _;. .0- -..-._;�-- 0 -. --.-•-_.__.�__ '_- ___`'S_B .---ST� - L-• EASEMENT .- �-T.,i-�-�.R� �.- �._� � Il I. EST BABCWK - +. EASEMENT 30 UTILITY ACCESS __-.__- _-_ -__-__.-___..__-_---_-- ._._.-__.__.-.�____�_._-_____--.__.___. __-__-__.___- 71 t1 / .W1.1C. .------_ _- { {_.__- I I� P.O.B. J A i ,A EASEMENT---_.-__45'--ACCESS-- ,2 I cas/1 aG COS { s , LGT t a! I18n' ! I s/jen tIJAG R/w II yw --- IN ASSOCIATION WITH: 1 LY c L4 01t• 63 La as I 2� vat" ''�I�e ¢ I 9�8 51 59718 t W`•'" wg�R�..Lcr 6��, 15 i �I� �.�L'r SST EXISTING STREETct { J,.�,O pG�M�Am.?1 t01 Cl 5rsy715 10�+ J �597 I qq 1oW+ WOJ�59J1$ &UTITUTY EASEMENT I 4�ie Gf�2•z� M''0r�- y+��I { IORa•„-R�� I�ay I I FOUND 4}BRASS CAP I WpF�sOew•--�• WJ SECTION 10 + I IN MONUMENT BOX { e5pen I I f enterpnses,LLc. I I I i LEGEND 1 PRUG_H SIDEWALKS NOTES ' FOUND US PUBLIC MONUMENT SURVEY t/a - ROAD CENTERUNE ' _•7+'"p°"''a"' ""'w"" SECTION CORNER MONUMENT 1. PRIVATE UTILITIES TO BE LOCATED IN ALLEYS. svrs �- DUPLEX, SINGLE FAMILY OR SET 5/8'dla. REBAR W/BLUE P9.A.S'RC CAP TOP BACK OF CURB SINGLE FAMILY 33 LOTS 5.75 ACRES • MARKED-"MORRREBAR ERLE, INC- 2. PROPOSED ZONING SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ' YJ/AUXILLARY APT ALLOYED IN THE VALLEY WEST PLANNED UNIT 0 FOUND 5/8"dia. REBAR W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 70P FRONT OF CURB DEVELOPMENT TO BE SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY MARKED-MORRISON-MAIERLE. INC, 10062LS WITH THE PRELIMINARY MAI SULIMII ILU FOR U v E T A B L E 10 LOTS 6.33 ACRES FOUND 2'ALUMINUM CAP MARKED KERIN&ASSOCIATES EDGE OF ASHPAHLT I MULTI-FAMILY GREATER THIS SUBDIVISION. ZONING FOR PHASE 1 O R-3. THAN DUPLEX O BUILDING SETBACK FOUND MONUMENT BOX 3. EASEMENTS AROUND TRACT 3 OF BLOCK aerrt I 9JmJs I Jaen+ mu alum aem LOTUNES PHASE 1 BOUNDARY 1 OF VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION THAT ARE CI ..L 1 I tm.bs' SINGLE FAMILY WITH OPTION WITHIN PHASE 1 BOUNDARY ARE TO BE tl 1 5=wl 10.10' ITN I Tor Ialy FOR AUXILLARY 30 LOTS 4.94 ACRES VACATED BEFORE THE FILING OF THE FINAL _C7_ -SO0.0D•_Ee.M_' 1711 APT ALLOWED -- -. --_ EXISTING SEWER LINE - -_ - - - PROPOSED EASEMENT UNL PLAT. -- --- - EXISTING WATER LINE 4.A 7 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - OPEN SPACE INCLUDES 3 LOTS) 1.72 ACRES PROPOSED SEWER LINE SHALL BE ALONG ALL FRONT LOT LINES i BASIS OF BEARING -J (PUBLIC ACCESS) ( S EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE AND A 5 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED WATER LINE ALONG BACK LOT LINES. I BEARINGS ARE GRID, DERNE0 FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS <T EXISTING WATER HYDRANT WITH SURVEY-GRADE RECEIVERS AND REFERENCED TO THE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE 5. LOTS ALONG WEST BABCOCK AND FERGUSON AVE. ` PARKS 4.81 ACRES I MONTANA ORDINATE SYSTEM. SINGLE ZONE. NAD83(HARN) y, EXISTING WATER VALVE SHALL HAVE A 1 FOOT NON-VEHICULAR NO ACCESS EASEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 0 PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE 1>oms 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE o EXISTING WELL Y PROPOSED WATER HYDRANT 6.WATER AND SEWER SERVICES CONFORM I �MOR RISO NC. RIGHT OF WAYS 7.66 ACRES m EXISTING STORM DRAIN TO CRY OF BOZEMAN STANDARDS. :m S7 2NW1 4 10 2 SOUTH 5 EAST "4 PROPOSED WATER VALVE + �.y.....040 ^� i „u+m smti sam-.asm-w�kmO.smm� r.laa a„ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA TOTAL 76 LOTS 31.21 ACRES PROPOSED STORM DRAIN + !ENT;ASPEN ENTERPRISES GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA FIELD WORK DATE:10/9/01 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/16/2001 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD BALL:i'=100' H:\338+\amWiO\PPwt\PPIdPiot-Ia.g CHECKED BY PROD k,3384.003 010 SHEET 2 OF 2 • 13 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Valley West Planned Unit Development Subdivision BOZEMAN, MONTANA' Prepared for: Aspen Enterprises, L.L.C. MORRISON L-i MME-R-L-E INC. Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59715 • Tva�Lc- +U d-A4 nod a `i" • TRAFFIC IMPACT .STUDY Valley West Planned Unit Development Subdivision BOZEMAN, MONTANA Prepared for: . Aspen Enterprises, L.L.C. Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59715 November 2001 `�.0 ONTq�y9:,� • •' PHILLIP J. '. • FORBES ' No.9112PE ;w HA33841002\Docs\Traffic\trafficstudy.doc INTRODUCTION Valley West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Subdivision is a proposed, primarily residential subdivision within the Valley West Annexation, generally located between Durston Road and West Babcock Street, west of Ferguson Road extending beyond Cottonwood Road. The PUD subdivision is planned to create a traditional neighborhood development for mixed density housing, including single-family, single- family with apartment, and multi-family dwellings. The Valley West PUD Concept Plan consists of ten residential phases to create as many as 1 ,436 dwelling units, and three neighborhood commercial phases, along with parks and open space areas, on approximately 310 acres. Bronken Park, a partially developed public park, is located along the south side of Durston Road, west of Cottonwood Road. This Traffic Impact Study has been prepared to fulfill the requirements of the City of Bozeman's Zoning Code at Section 18.54.060 and Subdivision Regulations at Section 16.18.050, both relating to traffic. HISTORY • The Valley West area was annexed to the City of Bozeman in late 1997. By agreement, the landowners were committed to make certain improvements to the road system, including: • Construction of Ferguson Road, from Babcock Street north to Durston Road; • Construction of Babcock Street, from Ferguson Road west to Cottonwood Road; • Construction of Cottonwood Road, from the then existing end of pavement adjacent to the Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision north to Durston Road; and • Paving of Durston Road to a County road standard, from Cottonwood Road east to the then existing end of pavement adjacent to Valley Unit Subdivision. In addition, a number of road easements were granted to the.City of Bozeman to assure that a framework of collector and arterial streets would be in place in the area to support future development of the property. With the exception of the Durston Road paving, all of the improvements.identified above were made to City standards, i.e. with integral curb and gutter and piped storm drainage systems. Construction of standard concrete sidewalks was deferred until development of the adjacent properties. Durston Road paving was completed in accordance with applicable Gallatin County standards. • Subsequently, the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update was prepared, reviewed and adopted by the City of Bozeman. The existing major street network in the area of this project is identified by functional classification. Specific standards for street cross sections for local streets, collectors, minor and principal arterials have now been established. The standards appear to allow for quite a range Page 2 of both carrying capacities and appearances for each of the referenced functional classifications. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 310-acre site is currently undeveloped, although bounded, as indicated above, by improved major streets. On the east, Ferguson Road, a collector, was recently paved to a 40' back-of-curb to back-of-curb standard within a 100' dedicated right-of-way; Babcock Street on the south, also a collector, was also recently paved to the same 40' back-of-curb to back-of-curb standard in a 90' right-of-way; on the north, Durston Road, a minor arterial, was paved to a 24' County standard between Ferguson and Cottonwood; Durston Road is improved to a County gravel standard west of Cottonwood across the balance of the property; and one set of lanes of Cottonwood Road, a principal arterial, roughly bisecting the site north and south was constructed, consisting of a 32' back-of-curb to back-of-curb roadway situated in the west half of a 120' right-of-way. As envisioned by the City at the time of annexation, excellent access from the site to the area's collector and arterial street system is provided by virtue of its location in relationship to the above-described roadways. Using coverage traffic counts recently gathered by Morrison-Maierle, Inc. and manual 9 peak-hour counts on West Babcock Street and Durston Road, an evaluation of the levels of service on said streets was completed. Methodologies presented in the Transportation Research Board Special Report 209 Highway Capacity Manual Third Edition, updated in 1994, and the more recent Highway Capacity Manual 2000 were reviewed for use in these circumstances. The two basic methodologies applicable to the task at hand are those for "Urban Streets" and "Two-Lane Highways" as defined in the 2000 Manual. The urban streets methodology can be used to assess the mobility function of the urban street, with the average travel speed for through vehicles being the determinant of the level of service (LOS). However, the travel speed is dependent on the running speed between signalized intersections and the amount of delay experienced at said intersections. The roadway segments being studied are at the outer edges of the urbanized boundary, not bounded by signalized intersections. The two-lane highways methodology is normally applied to through highways, as one would expect. A major change 'between the 1994 and 2000 versions of the methodology is the distinction now made between two classes of roadway. On Class I highways, motorists expect to travel at relatively high speeds on facilities that serve long-distance trips. Class II highways are those routes that serve as access routes to Class I highways, are scenic or recreational routes, or pass through rugged terrain. Class II highways serve relatively shorter trips. In evaluating the methodology Page 3 ® guidance included in the Manual, Class II highways are considered the best'fit for the roadway segments of interest. The LOS then is based on either the estimated or measured percent time-spent-following. Drivers generally tolerate higher levels of percent time-spent-following because of the shorter trips and different trip purposes than those of users of Class I facilities. It should be noted that the posted speeds on both Babcock Street and Durston Road are well below the normal limits of uninterrupted flow for two-lane highways, for which the methodology is best suited. However, traffic counts obtained by tube counters in 2001 on Babcock and Durston indicate the 85`h percentile speeds are nearly 40mph and 45mph, respectively. These speeds are judged near enough to the lower end free flow speed of 45mph to make use of the two-lane methodology an acceptable means of determining levels of service for this traffic impact study. West Babcock Street Morning and evening peak hour volumes were counted in mid-week of early January 2000 and again in. mid-September 2001 . In keeping with the Zoning Code PUD requirements, the West Babcock traffic counts were collected approximately one mile from the centroid of the Valley West development in the vicinity of Wilda Lane, east of the largely residential area generally known as Valley Unit. This section of Babcock . • was selected as being indicative of the most restrictive conditions on the relatively unimproved segment of Babcock between Valley Unit and Main Street to the east, and would be carrying traffic from the Valley Unit area. During both counts, a marked difference between morning and afternoon peaks in total number of vehicles was noted. The peak hour in 2000 and in 2001 occurred in the afternoon, essentially from 5:00 - 6:00 pm. as would be expected. As discussed above, methodology contained in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual for two-lane highways was utilized for the level of service calculation because of the somewhat rural, unsignalized nature of the roadway in the studied segment. As can be seen in the calculations contained in the Appendix, this methodology yields a percent time-spent-following of roughly 60%, translating to an existing level of service of C. As a qualitative check on the results of this evaluation, the 1994 HCM percent time delay of motorists on this section of the roadway during the critical hour was also evaluated. For field measurement purposes, percent time delay is approximated by the percentage of traffic moving past the observation point in platoons of two or more vehicles traveling at less than their desired speed, and at headways less than 5 • seconds. The measured 61 .5% percent time delay measured in January 2000 was compared to values in Table 8-1 of the 1994 HCM. A level of service of C would have 60% or less of the traffic delayed. This analysis yields a result similar to the quantitative analysis. Page 4 Durston Road • Again, two sets of counts were collected approximately one mile from the centroid of the Valley West development immediately.east of the N. 27"intersection in 2000, and between Valley Drive and Michael Grove in 2001 . As with Babcock, this section of Durston was selected as being indicative of the most restrictive conditions on the County standard paved segment of Durston between Valley Unit and N. 19"Avenue to the east, and would be carrying traffic from Valley Unit. The critical period used for the level of service evaluation was 4:15 - 5:15 pm. As with West Babcock Street, Durston Road was evaluated using two-lane highway methodology, and then checked qualitatively. As can be seen in the calculations contained in the Appendix, the HCM methodology yields a percent time-spent-following of roughly 62% during the afternoon peak, translating to an existing level of service of C. The January 2000 field measured 53.9% percent time delay during the morning peak in 2000 also yields an existing level of service of C when compared to values in Table 8-1 of the 1994 HCM. Cottonwood Road and Ferguson Avenue For urban streets, a level of service of B describes reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly , restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant. While only the intersection of Ferguson and Main Street is signalized at this time, by observation and inspection, both Cottonwood Road and Ferguson Avenue are estimated to be operating at LOS B or better at this time. PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is to be developed at densities ranging from 6 dwelling units per acre up to 12 units per acre. These dwelling units will be accessed from both city standard streets within 60-foot rights-of-way, and from improved alleys. In additionto utilizing the narrower street standards recently adopted by the City Commission through their approval of the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan .Year 200-1 Update, the project is planned to incorporate other traffic calming measures. Out of a wide array of such calming measures, this development proposes to use horizontal constrictions of the streets, specifically curb bulbs, at virtually every intersection inside the project. The curb bulbs. are preliminarily designed to extend out into the street slightly less than the design width of the parking lanes along the balance of the street. The perimeter arterial and collector streets such as Ferguson Road, Durston Road and • Cottonwood Road will not employ traffic calming measures, per se. Maintaining ease of operation on these streets should decrease the likelihood of cut-through traffic on the interior roadways. The exception is West Babcock Street where the intersections Page 5 a • of the roadways with Babcock will have some curb bulbs as shown in detail proposed Y "D" of the Valley West Subdivision Traffic Calming Layout Plan, included in the Appendix. Mid-block curb bulbs are also proposed in the longer blocks in the development. The intent is to develop a traffic calming device nominal spacing of 400 to 450 feet in order to maintain 85th percentile speeds within the subdivision near 25 miles per hour. This use of traffic calming measures is also in keeping with the Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Update. Two traffic circles are proposed in the interior of the project. The exact geometry of the traffic circles has not yet been determined but is likely to be of a larger scale than the traffic circles seen in the Seattle area that come as result of retrofitting existing intersections. With new construction, more flexibility in terms of the geometry can be realized. A vital consideration of all proposed traffic calming measures is assurance that the techniques used incorporate and facilitate pedestrian movement. • TRAFFIC GENERATION Traffic generation calculations for each of the ten phases of the development have been included in the Appendix as Table 1 , Trip Generation Worksheet. Descriptions of land. use, plots, and equations from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 61h Edition, informational report was used to predict the volumes of traffic to be generated by the project. Calculation of both average daily trips, as well as peak hour trips for morning and evening was performed for this report. In addition, the distribution between exiting and entering traffic during those peak hours was also garnered from the ITE Report. There is minimal internal trip capture expected because of the highly residential character of the development. However, a small percentage of this internal capture of trips is judged reasonable, and has been so indicated in the table. With the future development of the neighborhood commercial lots during later phases of the project, it is expected that there will be an increase in the number of trips that .are either internalized or become combined trips. For example, out of the home workers may combine their daily commute with a stop at the neighborhood convenience store. As can be seen in the table, the internalized trips are expected to increase slightly after completion of the neighborhood commercial areas. • The trips are distributed on the existing arterial and collector roadway system for each phase of development, based on the relative position of the cumulative project phases within the framework of said arterials and collectors. As shown on Exhibits 2, Trip Distribution &Assignment, the percentage of traffic on each of the selected roadways varies slightly as the project builds out, and its centroid changes. Page 6 The trips were assigned to the collector and arterial roadways for both morning and afternoon peak hours. When combined with the existing traffic conditions plus an assumed 3.6% growth rate in the base traffic level, the total trips on each of the key streets in this area was evaluated in much the same manner as they were evaluated for their current operational characteristics. All of this work was done without consideration of any extraordinary measures, such as pork chop directional islands, partial street closure, etc., to control the routes selected by the future residents of the subdivision. Distribution of the trips for each phase is also indicated on Exhibits 2. EVALUATION Calculation of the levels of service of the collectors, minor arterials and principal arterials under a) existing conditions; and b) existing plus background growth plus traffic from the development was performed at the points of data collection as indicated earlier in this report, and key findings were noted. Specifically: • The evening peak hour level of service on the two-lane segment of Durston Road is predicted to drop from "C" to "D" with development of Phases 1 through 6; • • The projected ADT on Durston at full buildout of Valley West of roughly 15,000 vehicles per day can readily be served by the proposed three-lane facility currently being planned; • The evening peak hour level of service on the two-lane segment of West Babcock Street is predicted to drop from "C" to "D" with development of Phases 1 through 7; • The projected ADT on West Babcock at full buildout of Valley West of roughly 12,000 vehicles per day is at the upper limit of capacity of a two-lane facility, and can readily be served by a three-lane facility; • Both Ferguson Road and Cottonwood Road can readily accommodate the projected ADT for each segment with existing facilities; • A signal at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and.US191 is predicted to be warranted and justified with development of Phases 1 through 4; Evaluation of the existing facilities and capacities of the same collectors, minor and principal arterials immediately adjacent to and within the site was done qualitatively, with the following results: • Ferguson Road and West Babcock, at 40' back-of-curb to back-of-curb, can be striped as to meet the current standard for the "2 Lane Option" for Collector Streets if parking is prohibited on one side of each street; • Cottonwood Road, at 32' back-of-curb to back-of-curb, almost exactly meets • the current standard for the "Maximum Roadway Section — 5 lanes" for Principal Arterial Streets. The boulevard, at 5.5', is 2.5' narrower than the standard; Page 7 • All existing improvements are expected to operate at level of service "C" or better after full development of the site. CONCLUSIONS All affected intersections within one mile of the site, including the recently signalized intersection of Ferguson Road with US 191 , will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with full development of the Valley West PUD Subdivision, with one exception. The intersection of Cottonwood Road with US191 (Huffine Lane) will eventually drop to an unacceptable level of service, unless and until signalized. A signal is predicted to be warranted and justified at this location upon full development of Phase 4 of Valley West. The City and County governmental entities continue to work cooperatively to improve West Babcock Street generally between West Main Street and Fowler Road through the creation of a special improvement district. While this process continues, as indicated above, the level of service on the narrowest portion of the roadway will not drop below D until completion of Phase 7 of the subject subdivision. • Also as noted above, the City has recently contracted with Morrison-Maierle, Inc. to assist with the creation of a special improvement district to fund improvements to Durston Road, from North 19" Avenue west to Fowler Road (extended). It is anticipated that this process will move steadily forward, with construction most likely to occur in 2003. The critical segment of Durston Road will not drop below level of service D if the district is formed and improvements completed as currently scheduled, prior to completion of Phase 6 of Valley West PUD Subdivision. Until Cottonwood Road is extended north of Durston Road, there will be excess capacity built into its proposed principal arterial cross section, and no operational problems are anticipated at its intersection with Durston. In the same vein, Ferguson Road will have capacity to handle the predicted traffic volumes for the foreseeable future. Extensions of Ferguson south of US191 and north of Durston Road are necessary before any real change in its traffic characteristics will be apparent. It should be noted the current and future owners of the Valley West PUD properties are bound by existing waivers of right-to-protest creation of special improvement districts for improvements to both West Babcock and Durston Road. Additionally, there is an existing waiver of right-to-protest creation of a Rural Improvement District, which in conformance with Gallatin County policy, is not limited to any specific improvements and can be invoked as deemed proper and legal for additional improvements to any area roadways impacted by traffic from the Valley West Subdivision. Page 8 RECOMMENDATIONS • The following recommendations are made in an effort to assure adequate mitigation of impacts on the area's-roadways as a result of the development of Valley West PUD Subdivision. 1 . Traffic calming measures as indicated on the Traffic-Calming Layout plan should be incorporated into all new construction within the subdivision. 2. Alternative modes of travel, specifically pedestrians and bicyclists, should be accommodated by all new construction within the subdivision. 3. This traffic impact study should be updated and submitted as part of. the application materials for each subsequent phase of the Valley West PUD Subdivision. 4. Left-turn bay striping should be provided on Ferguson Road at West Babcock Street with Phase 2. 5. A signal warrant study should be prepared and submitted to Montana Department of Transportation for the intersection of Cottonwood Road and US191 as part of the Phase 4 application materials. If warranted and justified, . as determined by MDT, construction of the signal and appropriate intersection • geometrics should be completed with Phase 4. 6. The referenced Durston Road SID improvements between N. 19" and Fowler Road should be completed prior to approval of Phase 6. 7. The south half of the planned Durston Road improvements, and a 12' lane plus 5' paved shoulder on the north half, between Fowler Road and the west edge of the Valley West PUD Subdivision should be completed with Phase 7. 8. The referenced West Babcock SID improvements between Main Street and Fowler Road should be completed prior to approval of Phase 7. 9. The east set of lanes on Cottonwood Road between Durston Road and West Babcock Street should be completed with Phase 9. Page 9 APPENDIX Traffic-Calming Layout Table 1 - Trip Generation Worksheet Trip Distribution Exhibits 2. Peak Hour Traffic Count Summaries Highway Capacity Manual HCM2000 Worksheets • Major Streets AM & PM Peak Hour Graphs Durston Road & West Babcock Street Projected ADT Graphs Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Recommended Street Standards • Page 10 Durston Rood 1p (Minor Arteriol) DURSTON PARKWAY 1, PRIVATE OWNERSHIP I I HERITACE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL a SOCCER FIElu MLDS ; `. I - 1 NOIE SPECIlIC ROAD 1 �,\ r I'OUi IN TNI$AFLA i0 BE DREFMIN_0 ' / Oe'NCRS AN MOFC PHASES I i 1 I I i 1 j W _ 60 � RI, 3� O 26' zb' _ OL: ----------I--�2 � R -w - '6 • 9� Fi I ` I DETAIL A INTERSECTION DETAIL 'B' INTERSECTION 411.. 9 SARrOrKPA KWAY a !-- x t c+ Y N O SCALE N O SCALE -- T_Q ---- —---t o r West Babcock o— p ° ',_ Street (Minor Arteriol) o .4m.. 60' W W W 0Q ` L O m R W R V I V m 3 a En QIU 3J � U a I I zb' 2p, j I I NORTH 60. __ I ———— 60' 0 100 200 400 Rey - 2'---- -------- R ------ 3' --1-------- R�yy 7— 20'----- Scale:1'=200' I (This Drawing Has Been Reduced) VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION I , I TRAFFIC-CALMING LAYOUT N ASSOGATION WITH: Dome 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE DETAIL • DETAIL 'C' INTERSECTION DETAIL 'D' INTERSECTION //�� E Y R U G H AMA ERLE:I C. ° t� - .�.- .�... =,1 a }?NON �li���+.4��� �-c•o�N car PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN.MONTANA NO SCALE No SCALE CLIENT-..-- COUNTY.MONTANA N O SCALE enterprises,I.I.C. t0/15/01 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/20/2001 T � ,Mr FIELD WORK- DATE: DRAWING NAME: E� � 597-Sc DRAWN BY. KSS ScALE:1'm200' It\3W\0M\AM\C0KCI3n\TRVMd.y CHECKED BY•PF PROJ I SHEET 1 OF 1 I �'LE 1 TRIP L- ON WORKSHEET Valley West PUD Subdivision MMI t133384.002.01 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS DIRECTIONAL DIRECTIONAL WEEKDAY AM PM PERCENT DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ITE RATE PEAK PEAK WEEKDAY INTERNAL AM PEAK PM PEAK Code (perunit) RATE RATE VOLUME TRIPS VOLUME VOLUME AM PEAK PM PEAK (Through)PHASE 1 No, UNITS %ENTER % EXIT ENTER EXIT %ENTER % EXIT ENTER EXIT SITE SITE SITE SITE RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 78 Dwelling Units 10.57 0.82 1.10 825 4% 64 25% 75% 15 46 86 64% 36% 53 30 Townhouse/Duplex 230 93 Dwelling Units 6.58 0.52 0.62 612 4% 48 171% 83% 8 '39 58 67% 33% 37 18 Apartments 221 24 Dwelling Units 9.29 0.70 0.80 223 4% 17 20% 80% 3 13 19 66% 34% 12 6 PHASE 1 SUBTOTALS: 195 1,660. 129 26 98 '163. 102. .'54 (Through)PHASE 2 RESIDENTIAL . Single-family residential 210 145 Dwelling Units 10.06 0.77 1.03 1459 4% 111 25% 75% 27 80 150 64% 36% 92 52 Townhouse/Duplex 230 168 Dwelling Units 6.03 0.46 0.56 1001 4% 76 17% 83% 12 61 93 67% 33% 60 30 Apartments 221 33 Dwelling Units 9.25 0.66 0.76 305 4% 22 20% 80% 4 17 25 66% 34% 18 8 PHASES 1.2 SUBTOTALS: a 1.t 344: ;, '•'. "' 2,768 209 43 158 269 188 90 (Through)PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 214 Dwelling Units' 9.75 0.74 1.00 2087 4% 159 25% 75%.. 38 115 213 649A 36% ' 131 74 Townhouse/Duplex 230 242 Dwelling Units 5.70 OA3 0.53 1380 4% 103 17% 83% 17 82 128 67% 33% 82 40 Apartments 221 45 Dwelling Units 9.19 0.63 0.74 414 4% 28 20% 80% 5 22 33 66% .34% 21 11 PHASES 1-3 SUBTOTALS: 501 3.881 291 60 218 374' 234 125 ' (Through)PHASE 4 RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 253 Dwelling Units 9.62 0.74 0.98 2435 4% 187 25% 75% 45 134 248 64% 36% 152 86 Townhouse/Duplex 230 301 Dwelling Units 5.52 0.41 0.51 1661 4% 122 17%. 83% 20 97 153 67% 33% 98 48 Apartments 221 78 Dwelling Units 9.14 0.57 0.69 713 4% 45 20% 80% 9 34 54 66% 34% 34 17 PHASES 1.4 SUBTOTALS: 632 4,808 364 73 206 464 284 152 (jhrough)PHASE 5 RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 325 Dwelling Units 9.43 0.73 0.96 3066 4% 237 25% 75% 57 171 311 64% 36% 191 107 Townhouse/Duplex 230 377 Dwelling Units 5.33, 0.39 OA9 2011 4% 148 17% 83% 24 11.6 184 67% 33% lie' 58 Apartments 221 84 Dwelling Units 9.09 0.57 0.68 763 4% 47 20% 80% 9 36 57 66% 34% 36 19 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Medical-Denlal Office 720 8 1.000 sq.ft. 30.13 2.43 3.71 289 10% 10 80% 20% 14 3 30 27% 73% 7 20 PHASES 1-5 SUBTOTALS: . 786. 6,129 .450 .104 ' .. 327 .581. 353 204 (Through)PHASE 6 Note: Includes commercial from earlier phase. RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 381 Dwelling Units 9.31 0.72 0.94 3549 4% 276 25% 75% 66 199 358 64% 36% 220 124 Townhouse/Duplex 230 442 Dwelling Units 5.21 0.37 0.47 2302 4% 166 17% 83% 27 132 210 67% 33% 135 66 Apartments 221 99 Dwelling Units 9.04 0.55 0.67 895 4% 54 20% 80% 10 42 68 66% 34% 42 22 PHASES 1-6 SUBTOTALS: 922 7.036 516 118 376 664 404 231 (Through)PHASE 7 Note: Includes commercial from earlier phase. RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 431 Dwelling Units 9.22 0.72 0.93 3975 4% 311 25% 75% 75 224 400 64% 36% 240 138 Townhouse/Duplex 230 508 Dwelling Units 5.10 0.36 0.46 2591 4% 185 17% 83% 30 147 235 67% 33% 151 75 Apartments 221 126 Dwelling Units 8.20 0.53 0.65 1033 4% 66 20% 80% 13 51 82 66% 34% 52 27 PHASES 1.7 SUBTOTALS: 1065 7.689 582 132 426 747 456 259 (Through)PHASE 8 Note: Includes commerclal from earlier phase. RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 460 Dwelling Units 9.18 0.72 0.92 4221 4% 331 25% 75% 80 239 425 64% 36% 261 147 Townhouse/Duplex 230 551 Dwelling Units 5.04 0.36 0.46 2777 4% 197 17% 83% 32 157 252 67% 33% 162 80 .Apartments- 221 e•214 •Dwelling Units 6,9v 0.48 0.61 1984 4%._ :103 20%• -80%-- 2tT- `79-- 13U"' 66Y6 34% 82 42'"' NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (Sit-Down)Restaurant 832 2 1,000 sq.ft. 130.34 9.27 10.86 261 2% 19 52% 48% 9 9 22 60% 40% 13 9 General Office Building 710 3 1.000 sq.ft. 29.94 3.80 6.00 90 6% 11 88% 12% 9 1 18 17% 83% 3 14 PHASES 1.8 SUBTOTALS: 1225 9,121 681 164 488 876 528 311 (Through)PHASE 9 Note: Includes commercial from earlier phases. RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 481 Dwelling Units 9.14 0.72 0.92 4398 5% 346 25% 75% 82 247 442 64% 36% 269 151 i Townhouse/Duplex 230 582 Dwelling Units 5.00 0.35 0.45 2909 5% 206 17% 83% 33 162 264 67% 33% 168 83 Apartments 221 268 Dwelling Units 6.57 0.48 0.59 1761 7% 124 20% 80% 23 02 158 66% 34% 97 50 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Convenience Market 852 3.5 1,000 sq.ft. 854.33 102.52 73.33 2990 20% 359 50% 50% 144 144 257 49% 51% 101 105 PHASES 1.9 SUBTOTALS: 1331 12.697 1,085 315 658 1.190 657 431 (Through)PHASE 10 Note: Includes commercial from earlier phases. RESIDENTIAL Single-family residential 210 498 Dwelling Units 9.12 0.72 0.92 4540 5% 358 25% 75% 85 255 456 64% 36% 277 156 Townhouse/Duplex 230 608 Dwelling Units 4.97 0.35 0.45 3019 5% 213 17% 83% 34 168 273 07% 33% 174 OG Apartments 221 330 Dwelling Units 6.30 0.45 0.57 2078 7% 140 20% 80% 27 110 100 00% 34% 110 00 PHASES 1-10 SUBTOTALS: 1436 13,267 1.127 373 690 1745 VALLEY WEST P.U.D. EXHIBITS 2 • TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 4% PHASE: 1 _ 2 (4) m (z) s 1 a 11) m (18) 2% Ourston Road 18% 1 18 (2) (10) i SITE 9 PHASEI 'rz � ° 5 .4 SITE To :'Bait aJc Street tk: .fi ' 34% =r, ENTERING EXITING --� a AM 26 98 9 33 0 (PM) (102) (54) (18) o C 10 c 0 8 (31) US191 30% 10% 2 3 (1) (2) 29 -► (10) 1 j 1 (16) 2% • MORRISON MAIERLE,t,;c TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS a% PHASES: 1 -2 3 wj 3 (7) 1 Se (4) 8 (2) (30) 2% Durston Road 18% 28 SITE r NEW . rr (57) oc PHASES 1•2 y f-- SITE TOTALS - r". b adc Sleet ;_''s 34% ENTERING 1 -b. - AM 43 158 54 (7 (PM) (163) (90) c a (30) 2S o c 16 13 (9) U E' (50) U5191 30% 10% (17) (27) • � 2% at; MORRISON jp�. MAIERLE,m H:%3384100rZ0=ATrafflclPU0 trip generaUon.xds 9 9 VALLEY WEST P.U.D. EXHIBITS 2 • TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 4% PHASES: 1 -3zi' x`; _ 4 2 I ° 9 ., (2) (8) 1 c (5) 10 (37) � f 2% ' ' Durston Road 16% 1 (5) 35 SITE (20) `"z�., .r•} a £r+'�yCts s -Y �-R � +{FAS 18 r o �c r ry 4 u (70) $ PHASES 1.3 S r a;. , SITE TOTALS fts'A S.gvgapciodctttreet� .r;> _ 30% ENTERING EXITING 0 AM 60 218 66 (7 (PM) (234) (125) (3 v 0 D: 22 m 22 12 S ( ) U lE (�) U5191 % 10% -� 4 6 (2) I (5) 79 (27) + (45) 2% WA'I-.MORRISON MAIERLE,Nc • TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 4% PHASES: 1 -4 = 3 II f* 11 (3) (11) 1 c I (6) 13 (51) 2% Durston Road (5, k 48 (27) u SITE 22 PHASESI.4 �° SITE TOTALS ,�ti ' gy �+ f 30% ENTERING EXITING -► AM 73 266 0 80 (PM) (294) (152) W (as) 27 0 2s Lm 0 • (97) US191 34% _10 10% 7 13) (6) 90 (28) (52) 2% ` MORRISON • 'MA` MAIERLE,Nc KA338410021D=%TrartletPUD trip generadon.$)s VALLEY WEST P.U.D. • EXHIBITS 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 4% PHASES: 1 -5 _ 4 m 13 7 (14) 0 11 (8) 19 (4) m I (63) 4 1 2% Durston Road 18% 2raF `^�f„x (37) � r ENO,�vee fi�SRE P sir p'l P 31 va ' x, Jy� (106) m PHASES 1-5 i ('wTa�a w ? jr' SITE TOTALS ¢ .BatxockStreet' 30% = ENTERING EXITING 10 AM 104 327 v 98 C9 (PM) (353) (204) ti (61) a ° 8 c 35 (20) (120) 1 U UO US191 34% 10% 10 () I 1 (7) 1,1 (35) + I (69) 2% MORRISON MAIERLE,L,;c TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 4% PHASES: 1 -6 5 II 15 (5) (16) 1 c (9) (26 8 (a9) LL 2% Durston Roao 22% Y 21 v3 Jr r y 5' 83 ( ) ' rZ +zt if ` ' SITE '1 .'.'�'�'eY'viT 'r. ?• � '^fir,' '},5.,� E.3_i 38 ,;t ' oPHASESI.B a,�„e.,',�� ' b�r` n C.a�,R,.� .,u�?s� 6 (129) K SITE TOTALS a~,:,.w�..y�. ?£n':ay.r,;. Babcod�Street,':: ;• 4':4t? 32% = ENTERING EXITING -► AM 11a 376 0 120 C9 (PM) (404) (231) _ (74) V G 8 � 30 (19) ' ' Q' 121 1 t� ri f t) US191 30% 8% 9 (5) la) 113 (32) (69) • 2% MORRISON MAIERLE,L%c H:WB4V0020=%TraMdPUD trip generadon.)ds VALLEY WEST P.U.D. EXHIBITS 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS. 5% PHASES: 1 -713. 7 II 21 I I (23) 1 c (13) 33 (114) 3% Durston Road 25% 4 I s 7`- "r '�'y" ><.:� sx,.g�,.•s,.fst "•.aT:%c� 106 R. 5,11 t sbtf '.,d`s' .7,% y� $ a' '4' "y's uS .s.+1''`L r d�Z f.•• 39 m PHASES 1•7 a z+t� }k „ira«.. (137) �° SITE TOTALS "x •x az:C 30% ENTFRIN, EXITING AM 132 426 v 128 C7 (PM) (456) (259) e o m (78) s° 34 0 36 (21) o LZ B E' (123) US 191 -► 8% 27% 11 (5) I (9) 115 (37) (7o) 2% MORRISON sa • . �A:' MAIERLE,tic TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 5% PHASES: 1 -8a: _ 24 (91 _ (26) I v (16) 41 (132) 3% tq� �.Durston Road ,t 25%• ,lk-. 16 ��x` 122 t +yO.�q�ll•EX�a{`,��R- F v� •. � 49�su PHASES1•8 (15 8 ) SITE TOTALS . _ s1a�:t BabrnGc Street :t1>• 30% SPIT RIN, EXIT.iN ——► $$ AM 164 488 v 147 C7 (PM) (528) (311) (93) 0 39 44 (25) 0 LL , (143) U5191 8% 27% 13 (6) ( 1 (11) 132 (42) ♦ (94). 2/ 'A MORRISON • :` i2AMAIERLE,Lxc H:%338410020=XTraMc1PUD kip genera6an.lds VALLEY WEST P.U.D. EXHIBITS 2 • TRIP DISTRIBUTION&ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 6% PHASES: 1 -9 - 19 40 20 (39) io (26) 88 (13) (184) 3% Durston Road 28% 9 'J �'� ' � 1. z 164 (20) -v�#2s'v, W. :: (121) . Om PHASES 1.9 ;'.:T SITE TOTALS a-f'r9 .. i r.. id i:2t�?a r"Yd)- i Babcock Streetc.,I°. Bac:F 27% = NT RIN ExiTiNG —g AM 315 658 0 178 (7 (PM) (657) (431) $ v (116) lx o 0 o c 59 079 f— US791 25% 9% —1 13 6 —0 28 (9) j (13) 165 (59) I (108) 2% • A.,Ijg MAIERLE,Lxc TRIP DISTRIBUTION&_ASSIGNMENT-PEAK HOURS 6% PHASES: 1 -10 __ 19 41 21 (41) m (27) 97 ♦�1]) m j (207) . 3% Durston Road 30% 11 ` l ,i"x? 51'Sj"yeyi z ai ,"'•� s 10 s �� ti wROF v n fir 207 (21) (135) el PHASES 1-10 � .t r#{ g� ui n`r{`'r�Ta;`, vz,,.�. � ! (173) SITE TOTALS`ti: _' '.sax•t :, i. �Cr ..EaDmcic Street>�'SNw? 25°h = ENTERING fIMUQ —'-10 . �R AM 323 690 V 173 t3 (PM) (691) ("8) 9 (112) 62 81 40 (173) ( ) 'o US191 25% 9% —� 14 6 —1 29 (9) I 1 (14) 173 (62) j I (112) • 2% MORRISON MA' MAIERLE,tic H:1338410020=%Traf8d1PU0 tdp generaWn.xls VALLEY WEST P.U.D. e • EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES YEAR: 2001 PEAK HOURS m 197 c (268) Denton Road ' 267 (2S4) SITE, _ 92 (268) z Babcock Street c 179 (7 0 0 (209) 37 SO z (49) (54) c c 207 $ 198 U (156) ti I (228) USt91 SORRISON WERLE,m H:W84t002Z=%TraMlc%PUD trip OeneratlorWs VALLEY WEST P.U.D. FUTURE VOLUMES • PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2002 PHASE 1+BACKGROUND GROWTH ' T 3 e 209 (296) LL Durston Road -G 294 (273) SITE 104 - .- (312) '• _ :st"iBabeodt��Stree�'.�''�:7.'St$�= 8 a 219 o e (2]5) 51 55 0 (58) I (69) c • U 24 I 1 � (177) (26 1 @ I (266) US191 MORRISON • NWERLE,m. PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2003 PHASES 1-2+BACKGROUND GROWTH :` x 0 219 (318) U. Durston F ad 315 � . (289) 1SITE:. 113 � fn.Feiecodt•street:rr�:::sA.,,� e 248 $ ♦ a (255) 62 I I 60 (65) (82) c • 266 I0. 1 225 (193) 1 m I (292) U. US191 MORRISON a'` MAIERLE,t�c H:W841002\0*=%TraftklPUD trip genera8on,tds VALLEY WEST P.U.D. FUTURE VOLUMES PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2004 PHASES 1-3+BACKGROUND GROVVTH 0 229 (a1s) Duman Road a...,•,.. .. . '.:•is 332 .. ':SITE:-...:'::.... . 120 o �ka",� .Fcy,•8atxaek S1reeF++.�,t�°.'��45 0 265 o a (270) 85 II yyy� 88 .o (79) 1 (107) 00.1 291 II 0 237 (208) 1 L. (319) LL US191 MORMSON MAIERLE,m. • PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2005 PHASES 1-4+BACKGROUND GROWTH ` m 240 (160) Durston Road 355 (320) + SITE 128 (394) 0 288 o o (286) 108 II 78 (94) 1 (132) 29) I .o+ 4 (212 (3 1 � (324) . US191 MORRISON MAIERLE,t%r- H:u38410021Do"%Traf lc%PUD trip paneradon-)ds VALLEY WEST P.U.D. FUTURE VOLUMES PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2006 PHASES 1-5+BACKGROUND GROWTH ;.,V- 0 v 254 G (383) Ourston Road 6•� x �s` s "� w 378 141 (426) � P�, ,.�� - •.�,+.r��>�BaDcatk"�Str"'a`ei�'�Ss�;4 x 0 312 136 IIo o (311) 89 0 (116) 1 (163) C 306 I 255 U (223) 1 (336) US191 < MORRISON • E � MAIERLE,Inc PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2007 PHASES 1-6+BACKGROUND GROWTH OEM o' 269 n (420) LL Durston Read tz. 413 6R,M§ ¢. E stre _10 a 342 134 I o e (332) Ir 69 1 (11 S) +I (161) 318 I 264 V (271) I LL (349) . US191 ♦♦♦ " MORRISON • ;ti19MAIERLE,1\"c H:V3841002%Dm%TraMclPU0 tip pener46en-%13 VALLEY WEST P.U.D. FUTURE VOLUMES • PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2008 PHASES 1-7+BACKGROUND GROWTH ':• _ e 285 m (4S7) v Dun:en Road i f g448 ; , fire?c -► G"a?Lrx Yyri`Y'W Ad-7y n}4 15Z` 157 gY}Y 2 357 it v (345) 152 0 (127) I (81) 318 se 270 v (232) (349) • USt91 � MORRISON a'a MMERLE,t`c PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR:. 2009 PHASES 1-8+BACKGROUND GROWTH eK C c 303 i (488) Durston Road }`' s. 478 415) 171 (514) _._p- 384 c v (371) ' 176 II 44� 109 e (146) 1 (209) 329 281 U (241) m (361) . LL US191 ' ,AMORRISON MAIERLE,nz H:%3384T0210ou1TraMc1PU0 trip generatictuds VALLEY WEST P.U.D. FUTURE VOLUMES • PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2010 PHASES 1-9+BACKGROUND GROWTH c 359 (552) � 4 Ourston Road F. 551 k (470) SNo 212 c 's'� 7 fib 1 :�3z -� x���eaccodc sveerE: 3 0 424 0 ♦ o (404) 221 150 0 (179) I (244) c U 351 I LL I e (258) (38+Ir m (380) US191 MORRISON �d�,a` MAIERLE,NC PROJECTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES YEAR: 2011 PHASES 1-10+BACKGROUND GROWTH - v 378 m (589) Durston P,oad �. �Sr�.K{sttC r�T+^� 587 212 tom..... 1a'' rdie':1;zf�8abeoek�5treeti �s+t'i��.1 v 427 0 0 (410) 220 K 149 0 - (178) (244) w IF 376 II n 320 (275) 1 (406) *U + a US191 MORRISON EjA MAIERLE,m • H:U38410020=%TraffiC%PU0 trip peneradon.xls • YEAR 24 • PEAK HOUR MORRISON MAIERM,iNc- Traffic Count Sumniur•y Street: Durston Road between Valley&Michael Grove Valley West PUD MMI#t3384.002.01 s Date Field Work Performed: September 11.2001 Hour Eastbound Westbound 15-Min Hourly Beginning Thru Thru Totals Volumos Morning 7:00 0 279 7:15 36 23 59 384 7:30 •58 '43 101 464 START PEAK HOUR • .. 7:45 64 ;;:. 55 119 462 -.8:00 63 42 105 432 8:15 82 57 139 8:30 52 47 99 8:45 48 41 89 Afternoon 4:00 45 51 96 463 4:15 60 . 53 113 522 START PEAK HOUR 4:30 52 66 118 521 4:45.. 71 65 136 520 71 ::;84 155 509 „ .. 5:15 47 65 112 5:30 51 66 117 5:45 60 65 125 Morning PHF Afternoon PHF I I 0.89I I ( 0.800.861 I I I I I I I Morning Afternoon Durston Durston Eastbound 267 464 F 197 Westbound Eastbound r 254 522 268 Westbound MMI#3384.002.01 YEAR 2uvl PEAK HOUR MORRISON I MAIERLE,INr- 'traffic: Count. Suminai-y Street: West Babcock Street immediately east of Wilda Lane Valley West P.UD MMI#3384.002.01 Date Field Work Performed: September 13,2001 Hour - Eastbound Westbound 15-Min Hourly Beginning Thru Thru Totals Volumes —Morning 7:00 26 8 34 229 7:15 35 21 56 270 • 7:30 47 17 64 268 . 7:45 52 23 75 271 START PEAK HOUR 8:00 53 22 75 244 8:15 33 21 54 8:30 . 41 26 67 8:45 321 16 48 Afternoon 4:00 45 60 105 376 4:15 27 54 81 371 4:30 39 42 81 433 4:45 53 ;. 56 :. .109.. 477 START PEAK HOUR 5:00 41 59 100 447 5:15 59 84 143 5:30 56 69 125 5.45 33 46 79 Morning Aftem oon PHF I ` 0.89I I I 0.80I , I I I I , I Morning Afternoon West Babcock West Babcock Eastbound 179 271 92 Westbound Eastbound 2097 477 268 Westbound MMI#3384.002.01 YEAI\ 1 PEAK HOUR c� MORRISON �� MMEM,iNc Traffic Count. Sun-►rnary Street: Ferguson Road immediately north of US191 Valley West PUD MMI#3384.002.01 Date Field Work Performed: November 8,2001 Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 15-Min Hourly Beginning Left Right Left Right Totals Volumes Morning 7:00 12 6 4 23 45 330 7:15 28 9 17 26 80 377 • 7:30 21 11 27 29 88 398 7:45 28 20 33 36 117 405 START PEAK HOUR 8:00_.,, 32 21 :. :18 21 92 361 8A5... 32 ::,,.: .:'.'::. 22 23 24 101 8:30 . 31 12 24 28 95 8:45 17 1y 16 21 73 Afternoon 4:00 23 27 22 22 94 335 4:15 22 20 21 21 84 352 4:30 15 22 17 17 71_ 363 4:45:. 29 23 ..17 17 > 86 384 START.PEAK HOUR 5:00 23 .:. :;.:'23 111 373 5;15 : .. 31 gp �17 17 95 .29 21 21 21 92 5:45 26 11 19 19 75 After'oon PHF I 0.871 I I I I 0.86I I I I 0.851 I 0..851 • Morning Southbound Afternoon Southbound 207 Ferguson Road 156 Ferguson Road 109 98 78 78 198 228 TOTAL: 416 TOTAL: 384 (Ferguson Only) (Ferguson Only) 75 Westbound 103 Westbound Eastbound 123 Eastbound 125 US 191 US 191 MMI#3384.002.01 HCS2000 : Two-Lane Highways Release 4 . 1a P lip J. Forbes, P.E. ' ison-Maierle, Inc. Technology Boulevard P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 Phone : (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 E-mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis Analyst Phillip J. Forbes, P.E. Agency/Co. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 10/15/01 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Highway West Babcock Street From/To Cottonwood - Wilda Lane Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year 2001 Description Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data Highway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 85 Lane width 13 . 0 ft 0 Trucks and buses 1 0 Se meet length 1 . 0 mi 0 Recreational vehicles. 0 0 ain type Level 0 No-passing zones 100 0 e : Length 0 .25 mi Access points/mi 30 /mi Up/down 3 . 0 0 Two-way hourly volume, V 271 veh/h Directional split 65 / 35 0 Average Travel Speed 3rade adjustment factor, fG 1. 00 PCE for trucks, ET 1 .7 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 993 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 321 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 209 pc/h Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h Observed volume, Vf 250 veh/h estimated Free-Flow Speed: 3ase free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/h Adj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 47. 0 mi/h �stment for no-passing zones, fnp 4 .1 mi/h ,:rage travel speed, ATS 40 .4 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment facto fG 1 .00 PCE for trucks, ET 1 .1 PCE for RVs, ER 1 .0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 319 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 207 i. Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 24 . 5 0 Adj .for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 24 .2 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 48 .6 01 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS B Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 . 10 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 80 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel., VMT60 271 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 2 . 0 veh-h Notes: 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. HCS2000 : Two-Lane Highways Release 4 . 1a P lip J. Forbes, P.E. ison-Maierle, Inc. Technology Boulevard P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 E-Mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis Analyst Phillip J. Forbes, P.E. Agency/Co. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Date Performed 10/15/01 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour . Highway West Babcock Street From/To Cottonwood - Wilda Lane Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year 2001 Description Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data Highway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 85 Lane width . 13 . 0 ft % Trucks and buses 1 Se ment length 1 . 0 mi °s Recreational vehicles 0 ain type. Level % No-passing zones 100 e : Length 0 . 25 mi Access points/mi 30 /mi Up/down 3 . 0 Two-way hourly volume, V 477 veh/h Directional split 55 / 45 0 Average Travel Speed :grade adjustment factor, fG 1. 00 2CE for trucks, ET 1 .7 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 'heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 993 Iwo-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 565 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 311 pc/h . Free=Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h Observed volume, Vf 250 veh/h Estimated Free-Flow Speed: Base free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and shoulder width, -fLS - mi/h Adj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 47 . 0 mi/h lestment for no-passing zones, fnp 4 .0 mi/h .arage travel speed, ATS 38 . 6 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor G • 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET 1 . 1 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 562 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 309 Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 39 .0 Adj . for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 21 .2 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 60 .1 06 Level* of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS C Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 . 18 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 140 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT60 477 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 3 . 6 veh-h Notes: 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is. F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. i • HCS2000 : Two-Lane Highways Release 01a 3hillip J. Forbes, P.E. ison-Maierle, Inc. Technology Boulevard Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 =hone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 -Mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis _nalyst Phillip J. Forbes,,,, P.E. =.gency/Co. Morrison-Maierle; . Inc . :ate Performed 10/31/01 -zialysis Time Period AM Peak Hour ighway West Babcock Street -rom/To Cottonwood - Wilda Lane jurisdiction City of Bozeman "nalysis Year 2011 )ascription Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data ighway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 90 ,ane width 13 . 0 ft % Trucks and buses 1 06 Segment length 1 . 0 mi o Recreational vehicles 0 6 e ain type Level % No-passing zones 100 0 Length 0 .25 mi Access points/mi 30 /mi Up/down 3 . 0 0 wo-way hourly volume, V 639 veh/h directional split 67 / 33 a Average Travel Speed trade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 SCE for trucks, ET 1 .2 -ICE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 :eavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 998 =wo-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 711 pc/h -iighest directional split proportion (note-2) 476 pc/h Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h )bserved volume, Vf 250 veh/h Lstimated Free-Flow Speed: 3ase free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/h .;�dj . for access points, fA - mi/h ?ree-flow speed, FFS 46 . 9 mi/h k&tment for no-passing zones, fnp 3 .4 mi/h ge travel speed, ATS 38 . 0 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor, fG • 1 .00' PCE for trucks, ET 1 . 1 PCE f or RVs, ER 0 1.0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 711 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 476 Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 46 .5 % •T Adj .for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 17.3 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 63 .8 01 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS C Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 .22 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 178 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT60 639 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 4 . 7 veh-h Notes : 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. • HCS2000 : Two-Lane Highways Release 4 . 1a Phillip J. Forbes, P.E. ison-Maierle, Inc. technology Boulevard _ .�. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 -Mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis Analyst Phillip J. Forbes,. P.E. Agency/Co. Morrison-Maierle, 'Inc. Date Performed 10/31/01 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Highway West Babcock Street From/To Cottonwood - Wilda Lane Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year 2011 Description Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data Highway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 83 Lane width 13 . 0 ft % Trucks and buses 1 Segment length 1 . 0 mi % Recreational vehicles 0 Te ain type Level % No-passing zones 100 Length 0 .25 mi Access points/mi 30 . . . /mi Up/down 3 . 0 % Two-way hourly volume, V 964 veh/h Directional split 57 / 43 % Average Travel Speed Grade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET 1 . 2 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 998 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 1164 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 663 pc/h Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h Observed volume, Vf 250 veh/h Estimated Free-Flow Speed: Base free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/h Adj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free=flow speed, FFS 46 .9 mi/h AqQtment for no-passing zones, fnp 2 .2 mi/h ge travel speed, ATS 35.7 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET . • 1 .1 PCE for RVs, ER , 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 1163 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 663 Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 64 . 0 % Adj . for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 10 .7 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 74 . 7 a Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS D Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 . 36 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 290 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT60 964 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 8 .1 veh-h Notes : 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS 'is F. s HCS2000 : Two-Lane Highways Release Pla ?hillip J. Forbes, P.E. 4 son-Maierle, Inc. o6echnology Boulevard . Box 1113 3ozeman, MT 59771-1113 ?hone : (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 -Mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis `analyst Phillip J. Forbes, P..E. -,gency/Co. Morrison-Maierle,- +Inc. Date Performed 10/15/01 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Highway Durston Road From/To Cottonwood - Michael Grove Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year 2001 Description Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data Highway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 83 Lane width 12 . 0 ft 1 Trucks and buses 1 % Segment length 1. 0 mi % Recreational vehicles 0 % terrain type Level % No-passing zones 100 % r Length 0 . 25 mi Access points/mi 20 /mi •• Up/down 3 . 0 Two-way hourly volume, V 464 veh/h Directional split 58 / 42 % Average Travel Speed =rade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 7ZCE for trucks, ET 1 .7 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 993 Iwo-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 563 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 327 pc/h Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h Observed volume, Vf 200 veh/h Estimated Free-Flow Speed: Base free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/h Adj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 46 . 6. mi/h Ad�ment for no-passing zones, fnp 4 . 0 mi/h e travel speed; ATS 38 .2 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET 6 0 1 . 1 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 560 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 325 j Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 38 .9 % • Adj . for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 21 .1 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 59 . 9 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS C Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 . 18 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 140 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT6'0 464 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 3 .7 veh-h Notes : 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, . terminate analysis-the LOS is F. s HCS2000 : . Two-Lane Highways Release 4 . 1a Phillip J. Forbes, P.E. M son-Maierle, Inc. " technology Boulevard Box 1113 3ozeman, MT 59771-1113 Phone : (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 -Mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis Analyst Phillip J. Forbes,. :P.E. Agency/Co. Morrison-Maierle, Inc . Date Performed 10/15/01 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Highway Durston Road From/To Cottonwood - Michael Grove Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year 2001 Description Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data Highway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 84 :Jane width 12 . 0 ft 0 Trucks and buses 1 0 Segment length 1 . 0 mi 0 Recreational vehicles 0 0 ,errain type Level 0 No-passing zones 100 0 Length 0 .25 mi Access points/mi 20 . /mi Up/down 3 . 0 0 two-way hourly volume, V 522 veh/h. Directional split 50 / 50 0 Average Travel Speed Grade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET 1 .2 for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 998 =wo-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 623 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 312 pc/h Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h Observed volume, Vf 200 veh/h Estimated Free-Flow Speed: Base free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and. shoulder width, fLS - mi/h Adj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 46 . 6 mi/h A tment for no-passing zones, fnp 3 . 8 mi/h ge travel speed, ATS 37. 9 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET 0 a 1 .1 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 622 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 311 Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 42 .1 Adj .for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 19 . 9' Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 62 . 1 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures _,evel of service,' LOS C Yolume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 . 19 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 155 veh-mi ?eak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT6`0 522 veh-mi ?eak 15-min total travel time, TT15 4 .1 veh-h .qotes : 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. ? . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. • • s HCS2000 : Two-Lane Highways Release 4 . 1a Phillip J. Forbes, P.E. ison-Maierle, Inc . Technology Boulevard . .O. Box 1113 3ozeman, MT 59771-1113 Phone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 E-Mail : pforbesCm-m.net Two-Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis Analyst Phillip J. Forbe`s,, P.E. Agency/Co. Morrison-Maierle, Inc . Date Performed 10/31/01 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Highway Durston Road rom/To Cottonwood - Michael Grove Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Analysis Year 2011 Description Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data Highway class Class 2 Shoulder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 83 lane width 12 . 0 ft % Trucks and buses 1 Segment length 1 . 0 mi % Recreational vehicles 0 0 ain type Level o No-passing zones 100 e : . Length 0 .25 mi Access points/mi 20 /mi Up/down 3 . 0 01 Two-way hourly volume, V 965 veh/h Directional split 61 / 39 Average Travel Speed Grade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET 1 . 2 PCE for RVs, ER 1. 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 998 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 1165 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 711 pc/h Free-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : Field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h Observed volume, Vf 200 veh/h estimated Free-Flow Speed: 3ase free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h Adj . for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/h Adj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 46 . 6 mi/h *stment for no-passing zones, fnp 2 .2 mi/h age travel speed, ATS 35.3 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor,, fG 1 . 00 PCE for trucks, ET • 1 . 1 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 0 . 999 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 1164 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 710 Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 64 . 1 0 • Adj .for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 10 . 6 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 74 .7 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS D Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 . 36 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 291 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMt.60 965 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 8 . 2 veh-h Notes : 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. i HCS2000PTwo-Lane Highways Release•_la ?hillip J. Forbes, P.E.. Oechnology son-Maierle, Inc. Boulevard : .�. Box 1113 3ozeman, MT 59771-1113 ?hone: (406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 -Mail : pforbes@m-m.net Two=Way Two-Lane Highway Segment Analysis ynalyst Phillip J. Forbes.,.. P.E. lgency/Co. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. )ate Performed 10/31/01 `analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour iighway Durston Road 7rom/To Cottonwood - Michael Grove jurisdiction City of Bozeman 'knalysis Year 2011 )escription Valley West Planned Unit Development Input Data :ighway class Class 2 >houlder width 0 . 0 ft Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 . 84 Jane width 12 . 0 ft % Trucks and buses 1 01 Segment length 1 . 0 mi % Recreational vehicles 0 01 e ain type Level % No-passing zones 100 06 ? Length 0 :25 mi Access points/mi 20 /mi Up/down 3 . 0 a .wo-way hourly volume, V 1085 veh/h Arectional split 54 j 46 li Average Travel Speed .,rade adjustment factor, fG 1 . 00 ICE for trucks, ET 1.1 ICE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 reavy-vehicle adjustment factor, 0 . 999 .wo-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 1293 pc/h ighest directional split proportion (note-2) 698 pc/h 'ree-Flow Speed from Field Measurement : ?field measured speed, SFM 45 mi/h )bserved volume, Vf 200 veh/h Estimated Free-Flow Speed: 3ase free-flow speed, BFFS - mi/h 3dj . for lane and shoulder width, fLS - mi/h kdj . for access points, fA - mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS 46 . 6 mi/h 1Qtment for no-passing zones, fnp 1. 9 mi/h ge travel speed, ATS 34 .6 mi/h Percent Time-Spent-Following Grade adjustment factor fG 1 . 00 PCE- for trucks, ET • 1 . 0 PCE for RVs, ER 1 . 0 Heavy-vehicle adjustment factor, fHV 1 . 000 Two-way flow rate, (note-1) vp 1292 pc/h Highest directional split proportion (note-2) 698 • Base percent time-spent-following, BPTSF 67 . 9 0 Adj . for directional distribution and no-passing zones, fd/np 9 .2 Percent time-spent-following, PTSF 77 . 1 °s Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS D Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0 .40 Peak 15-min vehicle-miles of travel, VMT15 323 veh-mi Peak-hour vehicle-miles of travel, VMT60 1085 veh-mi Peak 15-min total travel time, TT15 9 .3 veh-h Notes : 1 . If vp >= 3200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2 . If highest directional split vp >= 1700 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. VALLEY WEST P.U.D. • Durston Road-AM Peak Durston Road-PM Peak 1 j 1200 I I 1200 I t 1000 i r 1000 `m 800 j o Wo _ m 600 _ — i 600 - - . 400 i 'i 400 200 y-452.79e°r'• i I ; 2000 y.516.29eoan4 i i2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 i 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 j YEAR YEAR 1 j �E+pm(Eapanentlal Trendlne)I I —Eapon.(E:panentlal Trenmine)' I I West Babcock-AM Peak i. West Babcock-PM Peak I 1200 i 1200 1 r1000 ; I r 1000 800 i Soo m 600 - q 600 u 400 I i u 400 200 u y-304.62a00 ' I j > 200 y-526.04.0a ' 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 i 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Zulu 2011 I I I 1 YEAR YEAR j I I —Eapon.(Eapanentlal Tr-dr..); I —Eapon.(EaponenGa1 Trenmine); I 1 t Ferguson Road-AM Peak Ferguson Road-PM Peak 800 800 L 600 _ - r 600 .. e 400 ! a 400 o i U 200 `-' 200 Y ul -4S0.lSeey i > y.146.S9e°O1ppi j I 0 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 I i 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Zulu 2011 YEAR YEAR I—Erpen.(Eaponentlal Trend..)I j —Eapan.(Eaponentlal Trend ine)j ( Cottonwood Road-AM Peak ' Cottonwood Road-PM Peak 800 j 800 r 600 i c° 600 a 400 _ j I o. 400 ! m _�-�— i r 200 — — — ! r 200 i 0 y•97.e9fearmu ! ; 0 y-121.Ue01'°' 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 i 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 i YEAR j YEAR • i I�Eapen.(Eaponentlal Trendne) Eapen.(E:ponentlel Trenmine) ;tea MORRISON .a.All MAIERLE,m-c H:133841002tDocs%Trafric%PUD trip generation.xls VALLEY WEST P.U.D. Projected ADT Durston Road 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 y 8,000 a� Z 6,000 :c 4,000 2,000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year Projected ADT • West Babcock 16,000 14,000 - > 12,000 10,000 ` y 8,000 d 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Year JJMORRISON LA MAiERLE ivc. HA3384\002\Docs\Traffic\PUD trip generation.xls 5'Sidewalk 8.5'Boulevard 7'Parking 8'Driving Lane 8'Driving Lane 7'Parking 8.5'Boulevard 5'Sidewalk S ^ l� Q � �I s'rar VA too III=III=III= III=III=III= 31'Back of Curb to Back of Curb 2 Lanes Sidewalks/Parking/Boulevard Both Sides • 5'Sidewalk 7.5'Boulevard 7'Parking 9'Driving Lane 9'Driving Lane 7'Parking 7.5'Boulevard 5'Sidewalk rat �! 1ijfrry. . .>w,I ol o • I.Is' 1, 1' r �r� i1 .l.rr if ° 1 N. III=III�III- '^""""' III=III=III= 33'Back of Curb to Back of Curb 2 Lanes SidewalkslParkinglBoulevard Both Sides RM Requirements = 60' 5'Sidewalk 7.5'Boulevard 7'Parking 10'Driving Lane I 10'Driving Lane 7'Parking 7.5'Boulevard 15 Sidewalk !h 1' § MI. �.�I'4 �"a;' IM III=III-III= III=III-III= 35'Back of Curb to Back of Curb 2 Lanes Sidewalks/Parking/Boulevard Both Sides RMI Requirements = 62' r Not To Scale CA C to � CO * to CA do a NOTE: >y � c Narrower or wider local street configurations may be Minimum Features: acceptable depending on the character of the neighborhood. -Two Driving Lanes Please examine the City of Bozeman's Subdivision and -Sidewalks-Both Sides '—, o Zoning Regulations for details. - Bike Lanes-Not Required y ° -Boulevards.-Both Sides -Parking -Both Sides (Where Parking is Provided) 14'Tunijog Lane 10'Ped/Bike Trail 10'Driving Lane 10'Driving Lane 8'Parking 10'Ped/Bike Trail 8"ift'leva 8'Parking ebrd Ra Median 4 4E u V, re I AMOLL 52'Back of Curb to Back of Curb. Maximum Road Section-3 Lanes Sidewalks/Parking,Ped/Bike,Boulevard Both Sides V Centeflime Stripe ' 15!Boulevard 8'Parking 5'Bike 10'Driving Lane 10'Driving Lane 5*Bike 8'Paftg 15'Boul 5'Sidewalk 5'Sidewalk IM [MIIIEUMMEHIE 48'Back of Curb to Back of Curb 11IF-111EIIIEHIFE-11JEE 11EIIIE 2 Lane Option Sidewalks/Parking/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides 30'Tum g.Lane/ 5'Sidewalk 8',B aVarl 5'Bike 10'Driving Lane 10'Driving Lane 5'Bike l',--B6UMrd 5'Sidewalk Ra' M n J,Y --------- rr- ILA IIIEIIIHIII U= 62'Back of Curb to Badc of Curb >1 3 Lane Option Sidewalks/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides-No Parking V Stripe I'Stripe idewa 12'Doqbfe Left 51S gVjig16.5'Boulevard 5'Bike 10'Driving Lane 10'Driving Lane 5*Bike 16.5'8 oulevard'�-�It�,-,� 5'Sidewalk Tumiro Lane vg k ...> MY 45'Back of Curb to Back of Curb 3 Lane Option Sidewalks/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides-No Parking 14'Tun�jng Lan 5'Sidewalk, 81'.AfitrRaf 0'Drivinian g Lane 5'Bike 8'Parking A�ard ,ard 8'Parking 15'Bi J ike 10'Driving Lane 8z 5'Sidewalk AV.2" III-III-=III 62'Back of Curb to Badc of Curb Maximum Road Section -3 Lanes Sidewalks/Parking/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides RM Requirements = 90' CID C13 CO a Not To Scale r M CD CO NOTES: m Pedestrian crossing safety enhancement Minimum Features: 43 is required for roads wider than 2-lanes. -Two Driving Lanes -Sidewalks-Both Sides yCO Corridor lighting is required wherever -Bike Lanes-Both Sides M C-J r-61 raised medians are used. -Boulevards-Both Sides CD -Parking-Both Sides Grade separated ped/bike facilities should (Where Parking is Provided) be considered at major ped/bike crossings. 1'Centerfine Stripe 5'Sidewalk t 19'Boulevard B'Parking 5'Bke 11'Driving Lane 11'Dining Lane 5'Bike 8'Parking 19'Boulevards 5'Sidewalk �/r7a ... �n.x,b?JM... tn'Cdt �, .R , .MU� l __ t III-III=III-III=III-III-III- I 50'Back of Curb to Back of Curb II-III-III-III-III-111-III-11 2 Lane Option Sidewalks/Parking/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides -� 21'Tuming Lane/5'Sidewalk AP'Boulevard 8'Parking 5'Bike 11'Driving Lane 11'Driving Lane 5'Bike 8'Parking 8.5'Boulevard 5'Sidewalk :fps ]�-'�ti Ra...1Median livl; ; , x E1121"!" JW1 • III=III-III=III- 71'Back of Curb to Back of Curb III-III-III=III= 3 Lanes Option Sidewalks/Parking/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides Q 15'Tumi g Lane/5'Sidewalk 8.5'Boulever 5'Bike 11'Driving Lane 11'Driving Lane 11'Driving Lane 11'Driving Lane 5'Bike 5'Boulevard 5'Sidewalk I I- a;:afra,.. Raised. ledian �:yj ram„ 1' „q g 5 ter 5 i5 tf al t3rrrt "sy drL�Lsyy III-1II-III- 71'Back of Curb to Back of Curb III-III.III= Maximum Roadway Section-5 Lanes* Sidewalks/Bike/Boulevard Both Sides-No Parking Il is not likely that 5-lane Minor Arterials will be constructed in the foreseeable future. This typical section is presented to show how a 54ane facility would fit within the available right-of-way. 15'Tumipg Lane/ 10'Ped/Bke Trail 7.5',!Bpulev 12'Driving Lane 11'Driving Lane 11'Driving Lane 12'Driving Lane .5'Boulevard 10'PedlBke Trait ,r6ri +tyff. , Raised edian yr �5,14 ca�,� 5' 1' ,ku 5' fir{ip ct t }fit}` ;ni hGtc�ii7 i a�yt i., a• 3 H III=III=111� (F 63'Back of Curb to Back of Curb I I I1=I1I-1I I Maximum Roadway Section-5 Lanes SidewalkslPedlBike,Boulevard Both Sides-No Parking RM Requirements = 1.00' Not To Scale � 5 Co o CACD 0 CID • Co T) C3 m � O. 4 :it. CO r NOTES: E. aC Pedestrian crossing safety enhancement Minimum Features: c CA.) a is required for roads wider than 2-lanes. -Two Driving Lanes N a Corridor lighting is required wherever -Sidewalks-Both Sides -Bike Lanes-Both Sides raised medians are used.CO -Boulevards-Both Sides j -d' j —Grade separated ped/bike facilities should Parking-Both Sides(Where Parking is Provided) be considered at major ped/bike crossings. Minimum Features: 3o Sur. land •Two Driving lanes .. tv EmagewT 4 t7 aY e$.� Sidewalks•Both Sides S SEewatk &I3oklevad P�gike lane r t7 Oriwrg lane r Raised.r.R 1 t7 Omvg lane r pakVgike Lan fi:Boikrad S sGe.a7k 1 u t E �t �.. -� 1 -8'ke lanes•Bolt Sates r s n: �I 1• BoLdevards-Bath Sides 5s Packing-Both Sides r7 £ s (lhhere Parking is Provided) III�II�IE III-III-III-11 NOTgi: 87 flack d Cab to Back d Cwb Pedestrian crossing safety enhancement 'I B requred for roads wider than Vanes 2 Lane Option SidewalksB as ike/Boulevard Both Sides•No Parking Corridor lghlrg required wherever red medians are used. Grade separated pedRte faeftes should be considered at ma)a pedDlke aossirgs. a Ftnagenkr tar g Land a t3nrrymey . s 5'dewa7kl Cealeara I P,y;,yiglie l,.F tz ormmg Lane t t t•t�iva:g Lane I Raaea t I tl Lhvny Lan I tt tYkw+y lm l Parkinye�ke Ls+e I a S I y t s ' s—� r � 1 Illclll-lllBlic III=Illclll-III_ i � I 87 Back d Ckeb to 8adk dCuA Maximum Roadway Section•5lanes SidewalksBikeBoulevard Bath Sides•No Parking RM Requirements=1.10' Not To Scale td Ped93a Tral P tr e I 17 Omag Lane I 11'Oriv:kg Lane I I 'aR 14 Dririg Lane I 17 Driving tan I P�g/e_x��e IBof_.d I 1Q PekVBJce Trat E AE a E�s 9•E !E 7 IL I II�I I JII 87 Back of Cat to Back of Cu0 c 111=III= Maximum Roadway Section•5 lanes SidewalksBike/Boulevard Both Sides•No Parking RM Requirements=120' GreaterBoz�ea�001 Up4at�UanPlan Figure 114 Recommended Principal Arterial Not To Scale Street Standards 14 �.�"` � �' i I III �, • VALLEY WEST Landscape Concepts Master Plan The Landscape Master Plan for Valley West will guide the landscape design. Landscape and park amenities will be implemented in phases as the building lots and related infrastructure is developed. The plan describes an overall landscape concept that . implemented in phases,will yield a cohesive development. Recommendations include: • Tree lined streets with consistently spaced street trees with variety in species between neighborhoods • Similar treatments of public spaces throughout the development including greenways and parks. Landscaping will include natural areas, developed parks and transitional spaces. • Consistency between overall site/paving details through out the development and details within a neighborhood. Phased and Flexible .The phased improvement plan recommends logical implementation strategies that- balance up front developer costs with phased improvements. Implementation strategies include construction of some landscape and park improvements by the developer concurrent with subdivision infrastructure, as adopting design guidelines and regulations requiring a certain level of landscaping as well as leaving opportunities for new residents to suggest enhancements such as play areas or sports courts. •- • CCR's require owners to plant-lawn and street trees in the boulevards. The type and spacing of trees will be recommended on the master plan,typically 35' to 40' on center on residential streets. • CCR's require fencing or hedges along greenways and alleys to be.a maximum of 4-1/2' in height and constructed to architectural standards. Context and Place The landscape is designed to be sensitive to the place and context and consistent with new urbanism tenets. • The Park and boulevard designs blend the informality of the ditches, drainages and natural environment with the formality of dense urban development. Informal clusters of native plants will be dispersed along the greenways and in the parks. Species within the parks and greenways will be natives or adapted natives. The existing and proposed wetlands are integrated into the overall design by varying the dimension and defining a natural edge along the minimum 100' corridor by "contour mowing". This will be similar to the fairway and rough edges of a golf course. - Three levels of landscaping are recommended: Native, Transitional, and Traditional The landscape design creates a recognizable pattern in the landscape that orients . visitors and provides clues to"way finding" ■ Consistent and traditional planting of Maples (mixed species)along arterials. ■ Dominate planting of a theme street tree species within each • neighborhood/phase. ■ Use of Canada Red Choke Cherry where pathways intersects the alleys and streets ■ Clusters of Aspens at focal points such as development entry or pedestrian intersection in the greenway ■ Consistent development of the greenways along the project perimeter The plan proposes a hierarchy of parks and open spaces to'serve community and the neighborhood active and passive recreational needs. ■ Community Park A large park is proposed on the north end of the project. This project will include active and passive uses and will be include a full range of landscape treatments from natural areas to manicured park areas ■ Soccer Fields These fields are currently under development. Landscape will be irrigated turf. The sketch plan recommends connecting this park area to the lake with a series of trail and boardwalks ■ Lake/gravel pit The existing lake will be enlarged as gravel is extracted for the project. The lake perimeter will be designed for active and passive recreational uses to include trails, picnic area, boat launches, water access and fishing sites. The • perimeter and islands will.be designed as a wetland replacement project with consideration to improving wildlife and waterfowl habitat. The initial phases of the parks and open spaces will include landscaped greenways and natural parks. The initial improvements will provide pathway and trail connections to the City trail system as well as connections between streets within the first neighborhood. The greenway will a variety of passive and active recreational uses and built in opportunity for additions by future residences. 9 Pathway surfacing includes soft and hard surfaces to accommodate a variety of uses and users. Unpaved pathways in the Maynard Border Park are in keeping with the natural character of the natural park. • In the second phase, a large open green space will be developed in Maynard Border Park to accommodate a variety of uses from unstructured field sports, to kite flying to event staging. • Midway along the park, located south of the proposed greenspace,plantings create smaller scaled and shaded spaces for future development of a picnic area or perhaps a future creative playground. The landscape concept is environmentally responsible, sustainable and well integrated with infrastructure. ■ Plantings in drainage swales will be informal and placed to take advantage of supplemental moisture. • ■ A hierarchy of landscaping is proposed requiring various levels of maintenance and water. Natural wetland areas will be enhanced with streamside and waters edge plantings. Existing cover of native grass will remain undisturbed. Disturbed areas will be re-seed with native species. Grass in these areas will receive not supplemental irrigation. Plants will be temporarily dripped to aid in establishment. Maintenance requirements will be minimal once the grass is established. Transitional areas will be seeded with a broad-spectrum seed mix of native and adapted sod forming species. These areas will receive supplemental water from an automatic, spray irrigation system. These areas occur along park edges. The level of refinement will be determined by maintenance practices. More frequent mowing and watering will yield a more refined appearing landscape. Maintenance will consist of some watering and periodic mowing. The trees in these areas will be drip irrigated, as the amount of water the transitional grass areas will receive will be less than required to establish healthy trees. Traditional Landscape Areas will be seeded with turf grasses (or sodded). These areas will be automatically irrigated using spray irrigation. The appearance will be traditionally suburban in style. Maintenance will consist of regularly mowing and watering. Visually, these area will relate to the expected style of landscaping of properties through out the development • • Ah ��-— Durston Road 0 1 • I } e Y J Q Foster Street Z I Lu io I HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL c ti " Yal i21 f i h a < 3 LAKE SYSTEM RIPARIAN � Sao . OPEN WATER Doane Street CORRIDOR 10-12'Depth Fish Habitat z J. EMERGENT WETLAND ZONE Emergent Vegetation 4 � . WETLAND FRINGE p.o 3 Wetland Herbaceous and Woody Species 'v UPLAND AREAS NATIVE UPLANDS 6/ T TO7;-ti RESIDENTIAL Woody Vegetation and Native Grasses 1fr. TRANSITIONAL UPLANDS Mix of Tall&Short Grasses Low Maintenance Waters Street 4 Minimal Irrigation '3 Passive Use Recreation ' TRADITIONAL UPLANDS ,. 4 Maintained&Irrigated Grasses PRIMARY PATH Traditional Park Vegetation 1* Active Use Recreation e t ACTIVE PLAY AREA SHALLOW WATER WETLANDS COMPLEX " s" s t t. WILDLIFE HABITAT ee< 4 ✓ T k Educational&Interpretive Activities el g« Nature Trails&Waterfowl dewing P a Establishment of Nesting Sites - YI RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STREAM RESTORATION ydl Revegetation of Woody& 7Lrm% J �� .� s� Herbaceous Species 0 50 100 200 NORTH Fisheries Enhancement t I VALLEY WEST PUD VWP Bozeman.MT J � P�RUGH """"�'r+ L E N O N November �� � • _ 2 2001 'v�rarwso.a swsgszzsns FISCHER&ASSOCIATES ICOMMUNITY PARK MASTER IANOSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I COMMUNITY PLANNING PLAN I - 3 7i " i • •4 x ,V {• f 4 e ° RESIDENTIAL �I a� RESIDENTIAL EXISTING SOCCER 3 i %� FIELD COMPLEX { POTENTIAL j ,BOARDWALK � I �' s Brookwood Drive_ �taT5Q, 0 �. - / .'4 d - `t, f.a I �'„ '��i �Uu y ���q -i, •g8y. -4',E . : w ....., ;3' .-A SERVVTIO ' �° i Y" e� Bronken Fields� . + .. 0t U;. �,`� > I n z e a` SHORELINES ARE UNDULATINGTO t m ' D c / u 4' ' l ,.I fi e •- • ! INCREASE SHORE LENGTH AND xa °t °Roll a a -•- m PROMOTE DIVERSITY �'� ''mom .,.ai. " 'n =BOARDWALK Martin l t o. m t � � at I'. 1 _a,c. +4 • e e- a l• ! e°.:'I r RESIDENTIAL ,�, ► I „J i - „ .rl .r �` Q?¢ '•"''�,u._ , ���R ter" " :R,� 4 x T I' ;C I R \., i •> � '`-d � .,7 ' �5.,�,`��+ `Rs�'�' I z i �a' ,a. m r`, 1• IPARIAN. �. a r : I I" Q JI" ,, u,` CRRIDOR Q O I� Y I, ° ,s •�� � � �pRIMAtZ`-`EPATH� �. �', O w / I`' t e- m • _ _ s w. I n w rP. .� '• D r r HACIO El�LAN �VV'VVATE a s, .,si�e r^JjD,1C-�• MP E r �j : , I� ''�,' ,� I ., i �'` � •`�+'�7 � �VV OX : , If I. l � '�.-? ! I' lc�'A 'F" Y:> ,S;{`�` ,may K��� "t '+'�,�-�'tip-.��:.•.� .�-`it� - t 'I ? ;, 'f. �". �� "�, „✓,- ' I �t _ ; -,.)RD OBS RVATION.� 1 ,,. `:'"L: 'r i Al Ai FJi ' , et lie ,.� —Wesdalke Drive " SECONDARY ca•1 PATHra' ' TRADITIONAL PARK AREA WITH SECONDARY PATH TO BIRD PICNIC SHELTERS WATCHING AND PHOTOGRAPHY _001 LAKE SYSTEM OPEN WATER 10-12 depth a EMERGENT WETLAND ZONE I. fi.� `Freer 'Emergent Vegetation v m WETLAND FRINGE Wetland Herbaceous and Woody Species 'io x m° i . UPLAND AREAS o �' �� NATIVE UPLANDS r p'.- Woody Vegetation and Native Grasses TRANSITIONAL UPLANDS MATCH LIN " � b T�_ MATCH LINE Mix of Tall&Short Grasses - ,aria W` Low Maintenance R I Minimal Irrigation Passive Use Recreation , '1 r (�r -�vgs�eek h� TRADITIONAL UPLANDS 8 C>ti:: x�� O ~ "iw° Cascade Maintained&Irrigated Grasses ,,.,, � �,� d ,, street Traditional Park Vegetation Active Use Recreation ' '7 FISCHER&ASSOCIATES SHALLOW WATER WETLANDS COMPLEX Y'`,, , 1,` y, t LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I COMMUNITY PLANNING 7 WILDLIFE HABITATr Educational&Interpretive Activities ,f Nature Trails&Waterfowl Viewing VALLEY WEST PUD VWP r J Bozeman,MT Establishment of Nesting Sites tl 111� I/ P R v G x i� RIPARIAN CORRIDOR caivorr November STREAM RESTORATION s MATC MATCH I--J Sy`�o000e1 xooL .11m MdSom 9SSTSPr.S Revegetation of Woody& j west eaboock street �� LINE t. LINE Herbaceous Species 0 50 100 200 NORTH I ':"1. Fisheries Enhancement INSET'A' + I- - PARK MASTER PLAN i Durston Road PRIVATE ERSHIP W-1 W-2(C) HERITAGE CHRIST14N SCHOOL W-2(D) 3.75 Acr .5 Ac s t. W-4 Toole Street 10. Acres 4 Acre Ac 12 Acres W-3 W-2(E) ? 1.75 res '� cres AEl , Cascade Street W-2(D) W-1 —2(q) .5 cre W-3 W 2(B) I . Y 1 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS 2 Acres c=i W= West Babcock Street W WV b I-1 �mO gaO • �� 0O OD m ai m O NMGATED WETLANDS , LACUSTRINE _ WETLANDS PLAN PALUS FJM SCAL] r m 500' VALLEY WEST PUD VWP RIVERINE Bozeman, MT P_RUGH November L'E"N 2a01 I � K • • ,5 � � ...�"� �� m 8 3 g . '•�'• •:,,. �. E, 't • ��§.. 5� •��: Y, �C'� T �. ' DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS. FOR VALLEY WEST THIS DECLARATION is made this day of ,.2002, by Bozeman Lakes LLC, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant'; WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the .following described property situated in Gallatin County, Montana: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; WHEREAS, Declarant intends to develop, sell and convey the above- described real property, hereinafter referred to as "Valley West'; and, WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject all of said real property, together with the lots, phases and subdivisions contained therein, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions. and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "Covenants"; NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, declare, publish and impose upon the property the following Protective and Restrictive. Covenants, which shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of. maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design, use, and development of the property. Such Covenants shall apply to the entire property, and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted herein. The Covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, lot or division. Said Covenants shall.be as follows: ARTICLE] DEFINITIONS Section 1 . The term "Association" shall mean the Valley West Homeowners' Association, its successors and assigns. The Association may be incorporated as a Montana nonprofit corporation, with its members as the lot owners. • Section 2.. The term "member" shall mean any owner or lot owner. Each member or owner agrees to abide and be bound by these Covenants, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Bylaws and the Resolutions of the Homeowners' Association, if any. Section 3. The term "owner' or "lot owner' shall mean any person` or entity owning a fee simple interest in a lot or a contract purchaser, whether one:or more persons or entities, owning or purchasing a lot, but excluding those having a mortgage or an interest merely as security .for the performance of an obligation; provided, however, that prior to the first conveyance of a lot for value, the term "owner" shall mean "Declarant" or its successors or assigns. The term "person" hereinafter shall include any person, persons or entities. Section 4: The term "contract purchaser' shall mean a person buying a lot pursuant to a contract for deed,'Montana Trust Indenture or mortgage. Section 5. The terms "properties" and "lots" shall mean all of the real property herein described and subsequently surveyed and platted into lots as Valley West or a phase thereof, according to the official plats thereof filed of record in the . office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. Section 6. The term Directors shall mean the Directors of the.Association, and shall consist of three lot owners who shall be elected at the annual meeting by a simple majority of the members of the Association. The Board of Directors shall be elected for a term set by a simple majority of the membership, but not less than one year. Any vacancy in the Board of Directors occurring before the next annual meeting of the members shall be filled by the remaining Directors. The Directors shall have the authority to act on behalf of the Association and pits members as shall be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of the Association and enforce these Covenants. The Directors shall act by majority vote. The officers of the Association shall follow the directions of the majority vote of the Directors. Until 1/3 of the lots in Valley West, as described on Exhibit A, have been sold, the Declarant shall have the right to appoint the Board of Directors, who shall not be required to be lot owners or members of the Association. ' Section 7. The term "Declarant" shall mean and refer to Bozeman Lake LLC, and its successors and assigns. -2- • Section 8. The term "open.space" means those areas set aside for the use of all of the owners and the public, including roads, easements, parks, both active and owner, and parkways. Section 9. The, term "active park" means the larger park' areas that are maintained by the Association during Corp of Engineers required: wetlands monitoring period and will be transferred to the City of Bozeman thereafter. Section 10. The term "owners' parks" means the boulevard trails and parkways maintained in perpetuity by the Valley West Homeowners' Association. Section 11 . The term "Valley West Architectural Committee". or "VWARC" shall mean the Committee as defined in Article VIII of these covenants. Section' 12. 'The term "Open Space Management Plan" shall mean the management plan for open space with Valley West conveyed to the Association and / or City of Bozeman. The Open Space Management Plan shall guide the Board of Directors in management, maintenance and development of all open space. • Section 13. Other definitions may be.found throughout these covenants and those definitions are binding upon all owners. Any term not specifically defined shall be deemed to have a common and ordinary meaning. ARTICLE-II VALLEY WEST HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION Section 1 . An association is hereby established known as "Valley West Homeowners' Association" hereinafter referred to as the "Association". Section 2. Every owner or contract purchaser of a lot shall be a member of the Valley, . West Homeowners' Association. Membership shall. be appurtenant to and may not be separate from the ownership of any lot. Each owner shall be responsible for advising the Association of their acquisition of ownership, of their mailing address, and of any changes of ownership or mailing address. The initial address of the Association shall be 27 East Main Street, Suite D. Bozeman, Mt 59715. The address of the Association may be changed by the Board of Directors upon notice to the owners.. Section 3. For the purpose of determining membership, at any meeting a • person or entity shall be deemed to be a member upon the recording of a duly -3- • executed deed to that owner, or upon the recording of a Notice of Purchaser's Interest or an Abstract of Contract for Deed showing a contract purchase by an owner. The legal title.-retained by the vendor selling under contract shall not qualify such vendor for membership. Foreclosure of a mortgage, trust indenture or the termination or foreclosure of a contract for deed wherein title is vested in the mortgage, beneficiary or original seller on a contract, or repossession for any reason of a lot or unit sold under a contract shall terminate the vendee's membership, whereupon all rights to such membership shall vest in the legal owner. Section 4. The annual meeting of the Association shall .occur on the 1st Tuesday of December of each year. Any special meetings may be called by the President, or in the absence of the President, by the Vice-President. In addition, a special meeting shall be held upon call of 25% of the owners. Special meetings shall require 48 hours' notice, in writing. Notice of annual and special meetings shall be mailed to owners at the address for each owner as provided pursuant to Section 2 of this Article. The presence of members, in person or by written proxy, representing 60% of the • total votes of the membership shall constitute a quorum. At the annual meeting, the members shall review and approve a budget.for the next year, shall elect Directors to fill any expired term or vacant position, and shall conduct such other business as shall be reasonable or necessary to carry out the purpose of the Association. The members shall have the authority to set the number of Directors, which number shall not be less than three nor more than seven. Section 5. The annual meeting of the Board of Directors shall be held immediately after the annual meeting of the members. At the annual meeting, the Directors shall elect a President, Vice-President and Secretary-Treasurer for the Association from among the Directors, except that the Secretary-Treasurer maybe a member who is not a Director. Section 6. The Board of Directors shall serve for a term to be set by a simple majority of the membership, which shall not be for less than one year. Each director shall serve until replaced by his or her successor. Any vacancy on.the Board of Directors occurring before, the next annual meeting of the members. shall be filled by the remaining directors. J Section 7. The Board of Directors shall have the power and res ponsibilityof acting on behalf of the Association and its members as shall be reasonably necessary to carry out -the purposes of the Association, including but not limited to. take such actions as shall be necessary or reasonable to care for, protect and maintain the easements, parkways, boundary fences; drainage easements, open space; to enforce these Covenants; to collect assessments; to set annual and/or special meetings; and to act in any other matters set forth herein,or which may serve the development, including the formation of special improvement districts, either public. or private, for such improvements as the Association shall approve. The Directors shall act by majority vote. Section 8. The duties of each of the offices shall be as follows: A. President. The President shall preside over all meetings of the Association. He or she shall call the membership together whenever necessary. The President shall be the general administrative and executive officer of the Association, and shall perform such duties as may be specified, and,exercise such powers as may be delegated .to the office of President by the Board of • Directors. B. Vice-President. The Vice-President shall exercise the powers of the President-in the absence of the President. C. Secretary-Treasurer. The . Secretary shall give notice of all meetings of the Association, and shall keep a record of the proceedings of the meetings of the Association. The Secretary shall be authorized to sign on behalf of the Association, all records, documents and instruments when such are authorized to be signed by the Association. The Treasurer shall keep and maintain adequate and correct accounts of the accounts, properties, and business of the Association, including. accounts of its assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains and losses of the Association. The Treasurer shall prepare and report such periodic accountings as shall be required by the Association. Section 9. A vacancy in any office of the Association shall be ' filled .by appointment by the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting .or the successor is duly appointed or elected. -5- • ARTICLE III ANNUAL AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Section 1. Assessments: Each owner, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any deed or contract, .is deemed to have agreed to these Covenants, and to pay to the Association: (1) Annual assessments or charges; and, (2) Special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter,provided. The annual and special assessments, together with interest, costs- and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be a charge on the land, and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each assessment, together with the interest, costs and reasonable attorney's.. fees, shall be the personal obligation of the owner of such property at.the time when the assessments are due. • Section 2. Purpose of Assessments. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used to promote the recreation, health, safety, convenience. and welfare of the owners, for the improvement, repair and maintenance of easements, parkways, and common areas, and for any other purposes, expressed or implied, in these Covenants. Section 3. Amount and Approval of Assessments. The maximum assessment per lot which may be made by the Association in every calendar year shall not substantially.exceed the projected and budgeted . actual and. reasonable costs to be incurred by the Association . during the coming year in carrying out the purposes herein set forth, and may include a reasonable reserve for contingencies. The amount of the annual assessments shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the 'Association in the following manner: At each annual meeting of the members of the Association, the Directors shall present a proposed budget of the estimated expenses for the Association for the coming year to the members for review, discussion, amendment, comment and approval. The members shall approve or amend the proposed budget by a majority vote of the members present or voting by proxy. After the annual meeting, the Board of Directors shall set the amount of the assessments and the date(s) due for the coming year to cover the budget approved in the manner herein set forth. Section 4. Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the annual assessments authorized above, the Association may levy special assessments for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, or other capital improvements on the properties and open space, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, provided that any such assessment shall have the approval of two- thirds (2/3) or more of all of the votes of the members who are present, in person or by proxy, at a meeting duly called for that purpose. Special assessments may be levied to be paid over one or more years. Assessments for normal maintenance and repairs shall not require two-thirds (2/3) vote. Section 5. Uniform Rate of Assessment. Annual assessments shall be fixed by the Directors at a uniform rate for each lot, • except the Directors may Jix a different uniform rate for improved and unimproved lots. The assessments may be collected on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis, or any other regular basis as shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Association. Special assessments shall be fixed at the same rate for each lot affected by the special assessments. Different rates of annual or special assessments may be set for different phases of the Valley West development. Section 6. Date of Commencement of Annual Assessments: Due Dates. Except as herein provided, the annual and special assessments provided for herein shall be due on the date determined :by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall fix the amount of the annual assessments against each lot at least thirty days in advance of the due date of each annual assessment, and at least ninety days in advance of a special assessment. Written notice of the annual and special assessments shall be mailed or personally delivered to every member subject thereto, at their last known mailing address. Section 7. Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments: Remedies of the Association. Any assessment not paid within thirty days after the due date shall bear interest • from the due date at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. The Association -7- s s may bring an action at law against the owners obligated to pay the same or a foreclosure action for collection of the lien against the property. No owner may waive or otherwise escape liability Jor the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the open space or by abandonment of their lot. Upon delivery of the notice of assessment to the owner, the assessment shall be a lien upon the owner's lot until paid. The Association may record a notice,of the lien with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana... In the event of non-payment within thirty days after the recording of the notice of lien, the Association may foreclose the lien in the manner set forth under Montana law for the foreclosure of liens against real property. The Association is entitled to.. collect during an action for delinquent assessments any and all reasonable attorney fees and costs accrued prior to and in association with the collection of delinquent. assessments. Section 8. Sale or Transfer of a Lot. The sale, transfer or encumbrance of any lot shall not affect the assessment lien if recorded in the records of Gallatin County, Montana, or the personal liability of the owner responsible for the assessment. No sale or transfer to a third party • with actual or constructive knowledge of an assessment shall relieve such new owner from the liability for any outstanding assessments, or from any assessments thereafter becoming due, or from the recorded lien thereof. A person or entity . purchasing a lot shall be responsible for checking with the Association for any outstanding assessments against said lot.before the closing upon the purchase. Section 9., Annual Assessment and Condominium Assessment. Any owner assessed hereunder may be subject to an additional assessment:of an applicable condominium association assessed and collected pursuant to the condominium declarations, by laws and association documents. Payment of an applicable condominium assessment does not alleviate or offset the Valley West . assessment. ARTICLE IV ARCHITECTURAL REGULATIONS Section 1 . Purpose. In order to create neighborhoods that reflect the character and scale of Bozeman's historic core, these Architectural Regulations allow for a broad range -s- of design. Rather than dictate specific design styles, these regulations are provided to assist architects in designing buildings that are compatible and have clear order and comprehensive composition. Section 2. Introduction: The form, order and materials common with Craftsman, Prairie, and Bungalow styles allow for flexibility and make Ahem ideal models. for compatible contemporary design. Exceptions to this regulation will be granted on the basis of architectural merit or historical precedent, determined by the Valley West Architectural Review Committee (VWARC). Prior to beginning the design process, it is recommended that lot owners and their designers contact the (VWARC) to verify their interpretation of these codes. Every building shall be made up of one each of the following three basic components and all other requirements of the architectural regulations: A Base Element or foundation. (Section 3) • A Middle Element or elevation(s) composed of either a Single "Band." (justified horizontal design elements) extending from the base to the roof, or of alternating layers of Open and Closed Bands. (Section 4) A Roof Element. (Section 5) All new or revisions to colors and materials must be approved by the VWARC. The architectural and landscape elements of the site design are considered Jo be integral to the overall architectural design. Regulations defining the site design . elements are described in the. following Yards, Site Design and Landscape sections. Section 3. Base Element. A. . Foundations: The Base Element visually and structurally connects the building with the ground. It may appear as a platform or terrace upon which the house stands or as a built extension of the ground integrated with the house above. This element • may be a water table of masonry or concrete, or may .extend upwards and integrate with the Middle Element. On 'sloping grades, siding shall remain at least 1'-0" above grade, and the upper edge of the water table shall remain level, stepping ' down' the 'slope' in increments of 4' or less. Foundation walls shall be exposed a maximum of 18" above the ground unless they are integral with the lowest closed band. On sloping grades, see above. Concrete foundations exposed more than 3 feet above grade must have an architectural finish (texture, pattern and/or color). Exposed foundation walls or water tables shall be built of brick, smooth-finished cast concrete or synthetic stucco. Section 4. Middle Element. The Middle Element may be composed of a Single Band or of alternating layers of Open and Closed Bands. A. Single Band: A single band is defined as a wall plane extending from the Base Element to a Roof Element, containing justified windows arranged within the composition of the overall design scheme. Windows shall not exceed 50% of the wall area, and not less than 10%, measured on each elevation. Elevation calculations shall include exterior window trim. Windows shall be placed such that.- Single window units shall be no closer to another window than the width of.the window A window unit is no closer to a corner than the width of the window unit For multiple attached window units, the space between groups shall be no less than a single window unit width - 10- • B. Alternating Open And Closed Bands: 1. Closed Bands. A closed band is defined as a wall plane extending from the Base Element too Roof Element, linking and justified to adjacent wall planes arranged within the composition of the overall design scheme: Closed bands shall be at least 3'-0"in height. Openings in any closed band shall not exceed one-third of the wall. area .on each facade. Window placement shall be the some as for a Single Band Element described previously. Closed bands may be integral with the Base Element and extend uninterrupted to the ground. . 2. Open Bands. • An open band is defined as an opening, void in, or extension of; a wall lane or P P extending from the Base Element to a Roof Element, linking and justified to adjacent wall planes arranged within the composition of the overall design scheme. Open Bands shall have a minimum of 60% of the band area as glass or unglazed openings, (i.e. porch openings). Window openings in open bands shall occur in multiples of the typical window width, such that the window group is square or horizontal in proportion. Corner windows are encouraged. Window openings shall fill the entire height of the band between the sill and head trim pieces. Each open band shall have sill and head trim which shall fill'the entire height of the band between the sill and head trim pieces. C. Band Height: • Changes in band height may occur onlyat inside corners of intersectingwalls. i • D. - Openings; Windows shall be made'of painted or stained wood or clad in vinyl or metal. Higher-grade vinyl window packages will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Glass shall be clear and free of color. Window muntins shall be or appear to be true divided lights. (If snap-ins are used, only exterior models are acceptable). ; Buildings with wood exteriors shall have all openings trimmed in wood bands of minimum 4' nominal width. Bay window projections shall be wide enough to accommodate 3 windows and extend to the ground. Cantilevered bays are only acceptable on structural brackets approved by the VWARC. • Shutters are not permitted. Canvas awnings are permitted and shall be square cut without side panels. It is encouraged that front doors be made of solid wood, with complimenting wood storm/screen doors. Sliding doors may only be used in backyard locations. Garage doors shall be plain (no pattern; windows acceptable), and shall be built of wood, steel, or fiberglass with a wood veneer. Whenever alleys are not available, it is .encouraged that garage. doors do.not face the street. Garage doors shall be separated for each vehicle. Single arched openings shall be permitted only.above the main entry door and or at each main gable. - 12- • Section 5. Roof Element. A. General: Pitched roofs shall be clad with cedar shingles, natural slate, artificial slate, asphalt/fiberglass shingles with materials and complimenting color. approved by the VWARC. The principal roof shall be a symmetrical hip or gable form with a pitch between 4:12 and 8:12. Steeper roofs are permitted when complimentary to the overall design and approved by the VWARC. Flat roofs comprising less than 30% of the total roof area are permitted on all buildings. Flat roofs used as balconies on street facades shall be,enclosed with solid railings and integrated with the design. Skylights shall be flat in profile (no bubbles or domes). Skylights and solar panels shall be applied parallel and flat to the roof,and are not to be on any roof parallel to the street. • Roof protrusions other than chimneys and plumbing vent stacks shall n p y p g a of be placed on a roof facing a street or public space. B. Dormers: A dormer width shall be at least wide enough to accommodate three windows. Shed dormers shall have a pitch of at least 3:12. Hip dormers shall have the same pitch as the main roof volume. Eyebrow dormers are permitted. , C. Eaves: Overhanging eave depth shall be no less than 32", except in the case of eaves overhanging gable ends, which must protrude at least 18" (or at least 12" on accessory structures.) The eave may be encroached by a bay window or windows for no more than half of the running length of each facade, cumulatively. - 13- • Closed soffits shall be of material other than vinyl or aluminum. Gutters shall be built of copper or painted metal of a color and finish that blends with the finish color scheme. Gutters shall be half-round or rectangular and downspouts shall be circular or rectangular. Section 6. Chimneys / Roof Vents. . Chimneys shall be constructed of stone, brick or stucco. Chimneys shall be at least 3' x 5' in plan for lots 60' and wider in width, and at least 2' x 4' for smaller lots. Prefabricated metal flues shall be concealed within a chimney. Chimney caps may extend no more than 16" above the chimney top. It is strongly encouraged that chimneys emerge from the highest roof volume. • All roof-mounted equipment shall be . integrated into overall design ' and screened._ Vents projecting from the roof.shall be painted to match overall roof material color. Roof top equipment and vents shall not face a public street. Section 7. Walls and Facades. All facades of a building shall be made of the same materials and similarly detailed. Facades may change their primary material only at a band change. The intent of the regulation is that facades appear to have heavier materials on the bottom and lighter materials above (Le., concrete and masonry shall be below wood or stucco): Building walls shall be clad in smooth cut cedar shingles, wood clapboard, wood drop siding, wood board and batten, cement board siding, brick or stone approved by the VWARC. Stucco or EIFS with a smooth or roughcast (pebbled) finish, is also permitted upon approval based on design merit. The color palette of the body of the house shall be from white, cream, earth • tones or as approved by the VWARC based on color scheme merit or historical precedent. All trim, .frames, doors, and windows shall be in a compatible • accent color. Color schemes must be varied from the two adjacent properties, in each direction. Attached dwelling units exempted from.each other. Exterior wood shall be painted or stained (wood front doors excluded).. Siding shall be run horizontally, with the only exception being between`windows in Open Bands, where it may be run vertically. Maximum lap siding exposure. is 5" unless approved otherwise. Brick surfaces shall be predominately a horizontally running bond pattern. Stone shall be set in an uncoursed pattern with a horizontal orientation. No diagonals (sloping lines) other than roof slopes shall be visible on any fagade. Section 8. Porches. Front porches are required on residential structures. Porch railings are encouraged to be closed. and constructed of the :same material as the adjacent form. Open railing designs will be considered for approval based on design merit. Front stoops shall be made of brick, concrete, or stone. Wood may be used only when constructed to form an apparently solid mass. Main entry doors are encouraged to be either composed with the porch design and/or recessed a minimum of 5' from the primary facade of the house. Porch supports shall be stone, masonry or concrete piers no less than 16" x 16" square, or wood piers no less than 10" x 10" square. Column groupings must have an outer min. dimension of 10". Tapered columns may not be smaller than W x 8 at the top. The balustrade and the space below porches shall be closed and integrated into a closed band, interrupted as necessary for drainage. Exterior stairs visible from nearby streets or public spaces shall only show stepped horizontal walls, except that diagonal handrails may be attached thereto. Exceptions will be considered on design merit. - 15- Flower. boxes and. planters shall be made of materials integrated into a closed band. Front. porches are intended to be open .to allow for interaction with the street. Porch screens and glazing are not permitted. Section 9. Decks. Decks must face only rear yards. Decks may continue in side yards but may not extend more than 36" from the-side yard-facing facade. The space below first floor elevated decks visible from nearby streets or public spaces shall be wood lattice with a maximum of, 1-1/2" space between strips. Said lattice shall be applied in a non-diagonal design, between. and not concealing deck supports. Section 10. Lighting. A. General: • All exterior residential lighting must be free of glare and shall be fully.shielded or shall be indirect lighting. No lighting shall shine beyond a property's lot line. Mercury vapor and high-pressure sodium lights are prohibited. B. Residential (Single Family/ Duplex Lots) Lighting: All exterior residential lighting must be incandescent. Builder or Owner shall hardwire one light fixture on garages that abut alleyways. Such fixtures shall contain a photoelectric cell and maximum 60-watt bulb. Owner shall at all times keep photoelectric cell within the lamp in good working order such that the fixture can be illuminated during all periods of darkness. All exterior lighting of all lots shall be limited to maximum 60-watt incandescent bulbs and of such focus and intensity so as to not cause disturbance of adjacent lots. Obtrusive flood lighting is prohibited. Clear glass or exposed bulb (non-cutoff) fixtures are prohibited. • Recessed or can lighting is encouraged for porches and main entrances for softer lighting effects. Clear glass fixtures (i.e. coach lantern style) are prohibited. Honey glass or amber glass panels are encouraged as an alternate. C.' Parking lot (Townhouse / Parking Area) Lighting::' Kim Lighting "Archetype" outdoor cutoff.-luminaries With metal halide bulbs are required, with a maximum fixture height of 20'. Fixture wattages as approved by the VWARC. D. Street Lighting: The Valley West Planned Unit Development will light street and significant . pedestrian intersections with Kim Lighting"Archetype" outdoor cutoff luminaries . with metal halide bulbs. Special Improvement Lighting Districts will be formed as the project develops. Pole heights will vary as conditions warrant, with a maximum pole height of 30' at main intersections and roadways and 25' on secondary streets. Streetlight fixtures will be spaced approximately 300' o.c. between intersections on longer blocks. E. Definitions: Fully Shielded lights: Outdoor residential light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no light rays are emitted by the installed fixture at angles above the horizontal plane as certified by photometric testing. Indirect Light: Direct light that has been reflected or has scattered off to other surfaces. Glare: Light emitting from a Luminare with an intensity great enough to reduce a viewer's ability to see. , Section 11 . Yards. Fence design and location must be approved by the VWARC. Fences and gates must be made of wood (excluding split rail). Fence designs should have a cap board or if a picket fence, have a flat top or dog-ear cut. No chain link or vinyl fencing allowed. All wood fences must have a sealer, stain or paint applied in order to protect the wood from moisture and UV rays. i • • Maximum fence height is 5'-0" unless a variance is requested and granted from the City Commission. Maximum height for fences in corner sideyards shall be 4'- 0". No fences are allowed in required vehicle vision triangles. No fences are allowed in front yards unless approved by the VWARC. Garden walls and retaining walls visible from nearby streets 'or public .spaces shall match the water table or relate to a designed band on the house, and shall be built of brick, stone, stucco, shingles, or poured-in-place concrete with a surface texture approved by the VWARC. Garden walls should appear as an extension of the building and are encouraged to be of the same building material as the structure. Gates in garden walls shall be made -of wood or painted metal. Any fence or wall constructed so as to have only one elevation "finished", which shall be defined as not having its supporting members significantly visible, shall be erected such that the finished elevation of the fence is exposed to the adjacent property. All fences assemblies are required to be maintained for appearance and kept it . working order.. • Do kennels or runs must be attached,to a rima r accessory structure, g p ry o cc ry u re, be screened from public streets and adjacent 'properties and require VWARC approval for materials and configuration. Front and rear driveways shall be of concrete, or built of brick or concrete. pavers approved by the VWARC. Rear driveways have the option of being paved with asphalt as an extension of the paved alley. Maximum height of landscaping in required vehicle vision triangles is 30". Section 12. Zoning. All zoning, land use regulations and all other laws, rules and regulations of any government or agency under whose jurisdiction the land lies are considered'to be part of these Covenants and enforceable hereunder; and all of the owners of said lands shall be bound by such laws, rules and regulations. In the event there is a conflict between the Covenants and the applicable zoning, the most restrictive provision of either the Covenants or the zoning shall control. - 1s • Section 13. Easements. There are reserved, as shown in the plat and as may otherwise be reserved,. . easements for. the purposes of constructing, operating, maintaining, enlarging, reducing, removing, laying or relaying lines and related facilities and.equipment for utilities, including, but not limited to, those providing gas, comrriunication" and electrical power. Fencing, hedges and other items allowed by -the Covenants may be placed along and in the easements as long as the intended use of such easements are not prevented. Section 14. Basements. Due to high ground water throughout the Valley West subdivision, no basements are allowed. ARTICLE V SITE DESIGN Lot Types I - IV) Section 1 . Type I -Single Family & Duplex Lots. All building plans shall be submitted to the VWARC to confirm compliance with the standards below. Variances to the code may be granted on the basis of specific urban conditions. All building plans shall conform to the City of Bozeman Building Department's requirements and the appropriate building. codes. A. Lot Coverage: Not more than 40% of the lot shall be occupied by the principal and accessory structures. B. Accessory Structures: The following uses are permitted either as attached to the main house or as a.n outbuilding: garage (where allowed), workshop, artist studio, sauna, pool house equipment enclosure, gazebo, and conservatory. Accessory Dwelling Units are permitted only as a portion of an outbuilding. - 19- • Single. Family Lots located on alley-street intersections. are encouraged to contain outbuildings with second story residential use. The maximum_size.of an outbuilding shall be. 750 square feet on the first floor and 550 square feet on the second floor. C. Building Placement: Buildings shall be located on lots relative to the set back lines as shown on the land plot'for each lot. The front fagade of the house must be built on the front yard setback line ("built- fo" line). The width of the house on the build-to line must occupy a minimum of 25% of the width of the lot measured along the build-to line. Consideration will be given for 5' maximum setback from the build-to line, based on design-merit. Buildings located on lots with curved property lines at the street may substitute for that line, a straight line, located at the average depth of the curved line segment fronting the building. A 12-foot minim um.distance shall separate outbuildings from the main house. . • For lots at the intersection of two streets, houses shall have the entrywalkway Y and porch accessed from the same street as the adjacent lots. The intention is to end the block with houses that relate to the street in a similar manner as mid- block houses. For lots at the intersection of two streets, an unobstructed view triangle must be maintained for traffic visibility. Three points define the triangle: the intersection of the curbs at the corner, and the point 30 feet back along each curb from the corner. Lots that have a build-to line adjacent to public green spaces must. have a fence/hedge separation between the public and private areas where the building does not touch the build-to.line. This separation must be a minimum of 3 feet in height and extend from the face of the building to the rear property line. Unless otherwise prohibited by a no access strip, a maximum of 30% of the lots on each block will be allowed vehicle access from the street. The VWARC will grant approvals based on adjacency conditions. The intent is to distribute street access points along the both sides of the street, creating streetscape variation and breaks within on-street parking. -20- • The face of 30' R.O.W. alley accessed garages must be built 5 feet from the alley property line. The face of 20' R.O.W. alley accessed garages must be built 10 feet from the alley property line. Variances for stated alley build-to lines may be granted by the VWARC based on design merit. It is the intent of the'Code to create a defined edge along the alley. Street accessed garages, where allowed with single family dwellings, must be located a minimum of 20 feet back from the front.yard set back, at the primary street facade. Attached garages on corner duplex lots shall be clearly subordinate to the dwelling. A subordinate garage has both of the following characteristics: 1. The area of the garage vehicle door(s) comprises 30% or less of the total- square footage, exclusive of any exposed roof areas, of the principal facade of the dwelling. 2. The facade with the garage vehicle(s) entrance is recessed at least two feet beyond the facade of the dwelling containing the main entry. D. Permitted Encroachments: • Front porches, steps, balconies, stoops, open porches, and. covered walkways p p p p Y may encroach 5 feet into the front yard set back. On street corner lots, porches and bay windows may not encroach into the street vision triangle. Bay windows are permitted to encroach 2'-0" into setbacks. The location of bay window projections in an encroachment area between two buildings must be approved by the VWARC and is subject to building code separation requirements. E. Parking: The maximum distance allowed for parking from the alley accessed property line is 35 feet. Private parking spaces shall be no less than 9 feet x 19 feet with access to a street or alley. • Trash containers shall be located adjacent to or within the parking area and shall be screened from public view. -21 - • One off-street parking space is required where net residential square footage is eight hundred square-feet or less. Two off-street parking spaces are required where net residential square footage is greater than eight hundred square feet,. F. Building.Height: The first floor elevations shall be a minimum of 2 feet and a maximum of 5 feet above the average fronting street. elevations measured on the property line. Variances may be granted on a case-by-case basis. The intent is to create a defining edge and a street friendly appearance, with an open porch raised to enhance privacy. Single family and duplex structures shall be a maximum of 2.5 floors. The maximum height of outbuildings shall be 2 floors. Maximum building height is 32' measured from average finish grade to the ridgeline. The maximum building height shall never exceed that governed by the City of Bozeman. • Half stories indicate stories above the eave line, which receive light through dormers. Section 2,, Type II-Townhouse/Multi-Family Lots. All project plans shall be submitted to the VWARC's office to confirm compliance with the standards below. Variances-to the code may be granted on the basis of specific urban conditions. All building plans shall conform to the City of Bozeman Building Department's requirements and the building code. A. Lot Coverage: , Not more than 50% of the lot shall be occupied by the principal and accessory structures. B. Accessory Buildings: The following uses are permitted either as .attached to main structure or.as an outbuilding: garage, workshop, artist studio, sauna/pool house equipment enclosure, gazebo, conservatory. -22- • C. Building Placement: Buildings shall be located..on lots relative to the set back lines as shown on the land plat for each Iot. Building street facades must occupy 100% of the. lot frontage, less required setbacks. On corner lots, building 'street facades must occupy a minimum,of 75% of the lot frontage, less required-setbacks. Exceptions allowed for attached units of 10 or more in length. Detached garages must be separated from the main structure by a minimum of 20 feet. Buildings located on lots with curved property lines at the street may substitute for that'line, a .straight line, located at the averaged depth of the curved line segment fronting the building. For lots at the intersection of two streets, an obstructed view triangle must be maintained for traffic visibility. Three points define the triangle: the intersection of the curbs at the corner,.and the point 30 feet back along each curb from the • corner.. D. Permitted Encroachments: Balconies, steps, stoops, open porches, covered walkways, and bay windows are permitted to encroach front yard setbacks up to 5 feet. Porches and bay windows may net encroach into the vision triangle on a corner lot. E. Parking: On-site parking spaces shall be provided only at the-rear of the.lot. Private parking spaces shall be no less than 9 feet x 19 feet with access to a street or alley. Trash containers shall be located within the parking areas and be screened. One off-street parking space is required for each unit where net residential • square footage is eight hundred square feet or less. -23- • Two off-street parking spaces are required for each unit where net residential square footage is greater than eight hundred square feet. F. Building Height: A Townhouse shall have a minimum of 2 floors and a maximum of 3 floors. Maximum ridge height is 38'-0" measured from the average.finish grade to the ridgeline. Half stories indicate stories above the. eave line, which receive light through dormers. First floor elevation shall be a minimum of 2 feet above sidewalk elevation. Section 3. Type III -Cottonwood Shop Front/Loft Lots. All building plans shall be submitted to the VWARC to confirm compliance with the standards below. Variances to the code may be granted on the basis of • specific urban .conditions. All building plans. shall conform to the City of Bozeman Building Dep-artment's requirements and,the Uniform Building Code. A. Building Use: Commercial ground floor with residential or office on 2nd and 3rd floors. Permitted conditional and accessory uses as specified in City of Bozeman Zone Code B-1 designation (Neighborhood Service District). B. Building.Placement: Buildings shall be located on lots relative to the set back.lines as shown on. the land plat for each.lot. Buildings shall be set on lots at 4 feet from property lines with pavement/sidewalk extending to building. Building street facades must occupy 90% of the lot frontage. On corner lots, building street facade must occupy a minimum 75% of the total lot frontage. Buildings at street corner lots shall clear a ' view triangle generated by connecting the two curb edges at a distance of 30 feet from their intersection. -24- • If on-street parking.is provided, the triangle shall be formed not along the curb p 9. P g 9 but along the edges of the travel lane. C. Permitted Encroachments: Paved yards are a mandatory encroachment beyond the build-to line*. Balconies and roof eaves are permitted encroachments:beyond the build-to line. D. Parking: On-site parking spaces shall be provided only to the rear of the lot-and be screened from any residential adjacencies. Private parking spaces shall be no less than 9 feet x 19 feet with access to a street.or alley. Trash containers shall be located within the parking area and screened from public view. • it per every One parking space is required p 400 gross square feet of net office or commercial space. (1) Space per residential unit less than 800 SF, (2) spaces for units above 800 SF. E. Building Height: Heights shall be measured relative to the fronting street elevation measured on the frontage line to the parapet or ridgeline. Maximum building height is 38'. Section 4. Type IV- Westlake Business Park'Lots. All building plans shall be submitted to the VWARC to confirm compliance with the standards below. Variances to the code may be granted on the basis of specific urban conditions. All building plans shall conform to the City of Bozeman Building Department's requirements and the Uniform Building Code. -25- • A. Building Use: Permitted uses are limited to those allowed under City of Bozeman Zoning B 1 designation (Neighborhood Service District). B.. Building Placement: Buildings shall be located on lots relative to the set back lines as.shown on the land plat for each lot. No more than sixty percent of the lot shall be occupied by impervious surfaces. The remaining forty percent of the total lot area shall be subject to City of Bozeman zone code landscape standards (18.50.1,00) Minimum yards as follows: Front Yard.(or public street frontage): 35 feet Rear Yard: 25 feet Side Yard: 25 feet C. Permitted Encroachments: • Balconies and roof eaves are permitted encroachments beyond the it -p yo e build-to d to line. D. Parking: . On-site parking spaces shall be provided only to the rear of the lot and be screened from any residential adjacencies. Variances will be considered based on site design merit. Private parking spaces shall be no less than 9 feet x 19 feet with access to a street. Trash containers shall be located within the parking area and screened from public view. One parking space is required per every 400 gross square feet of net office or commercial space. -26- • E. Building Height: Heights shall be measured relative to the fronting street elevation measured on the frontage line. Maximum building height is 38 feet for roof pitches 3.12 (min.) or 6:12 (max.). . ARTICLE VI LANDSCAPE DESIGN Section 1 . Definitions. Front Yard: The areas from the set back (build-to) line to the property line; and from side lot line to side lot line. Side Yard Corridor: The area from the side. of the house to the side lot line, less front yard and rear yard. • Rear Yard: The area from the back of the structure extending to the rear property line. Section 2. Yards -Type I Lots. Each site owner will be required to meet minimum landscape specifications consistent with the. overall plan. These will include, but are not limited to: street trees, large canopy trees in specified yards, shrubs, mixed planting beds and turf lawns. The Owner is encouraged to plant native species (shrubs and trees). Wildlife- friendly shrubs, preferably planted in an in or mixed hedge at the yard perimeters. A minimum of .1.00 total liner feet of side yard hedges (min. 24" height, max. 24" o.c. spacing, min. 12' min. section length when planted), planting of at least three minimum 2" did. caliper trees (one front yard, two rear yard) and at least three appropriately sized planting beds (two front, one rear). at the house perimeter containing mixed shrubs is required. Variances will be granted based on design merit. Individual lot owners shall be responsible for landscaping of the adjacent boulevard area (non-boulevard trail frontage) at the time of occupancy and -27- • i • maintenance thereafter. Min. 2" dia. caliper trees shall be planted to follow City of Bozeman requirements for species and spacing. Planting beds shall have a top layer of mulch or.earth tone stone (non-white): Deciduous canopy trees and evergreen trees are encouraged in the-side yard corridor. Deciduous trees must be planted a minimum of 20 feet from the eaves. Property.owners determine their own gardens, perennials, native grasses and/or ground covers in the rear yard. When selecting from provided species list, it is the responsibility of the property owner to check the appropriateness of that species with specific site conditions. Windbreaks consisting of a row of evergreen trees are encouraged for the north and northwest side and rear lot lines, but must be held back a minimum of 8 feet from the lot line when adjacent to a neighbor and out of utility easements. It is the responsibility of the Owner to contact the appropriate utility companies • before digging.- Section 3. Yards -Type II, III, and IV lots. Properties are. subject to City of Bozeman Zone Code landscape requirements as a minimum. Planting beds shall have a top layer of mulch or earth tone stone (non-white). Individual lot owners shall be responsible for landscaping of the adjacent boulevard area (non-boulevard trail frontage) at the time of occupancy and maintenance. thereafter. Turf grass and minimum 2" dia. caliper trees shall be planted to follow City of Bozeman requirements for species and spacing. Section 4. Alleys. Unless prevented by a utility easement or garage access, the Owner shall plant a minimum of one minimum 2" dia. caliper deciduous tree (in addition to the rear yard requirement) for each lot width 60 feet and smaller, two min. 2" dia. caliper deciduous trees for each lot larger than 60 feet, near the alley. -28- • Section 5. Garbage. There shall be no incineration or burning of garbage, trash or other waste or debris on any lot. No junk, garbage, trash, equipment; unworking or out of use vehicles; parts, metals, lumber, debris or other waste shall be allowed to accumulate on any lot. All garbage and trash requirements of the City of Bozeman shall be observed. Garbage containers shall be kept in the garage-.or other enclosures except on garbage pick-up day. Each lot owner shall maintain the alley right-of-way adjacent to the owner's property. Such maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, picking up and appropriately. disposing of debris and garbage, mowing and trimming of the alley right-of-way. Section 6. Weed Control. The owner of each lot shall control the'weeds and all noxious plants on their lot; provided, however, that the owner shall not use spray or killing materials in such a way as to be harmful to humans or animals or to the other owners' vegetation. In the event an owner shall not control the weeds and noxious plants, the Association, after ten days written notice to an owner to control the same, may • cause the weeds or noxious plants to be controlled, and may assess the lot owner for the costs thereof. ARTICLE VII DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS Section 1 . Submission of Plans Before Construction. No residence, fence, wall, garage, outbuilding or other structure shall be. made, -erected, altered or permitted to remain upon the properties until written plans and specifications showing the design, nature, kind, color, dimensions, shape, elevations, material, use and location of the same shall have been submitted and approved, in writing, by a majority of the VWARC as to compliance with these Covenants, as well as appropriate City of Bozeman review, permitting and fee payment. Section 2. General Requirements. Submit two copies of the required documents for each design review to the: p q 9 -29- Valley West Architectural Review Committee (VWARC) 27 East Main Street, Suite D. Bozeman, Montana 59715-4775 The design review cycle begins on Monday of each week. Submittals must be received by noon on Friday of the previous week, and labeled with "Valley West Architectural Review Committee" and specific project title and address. Upon VWARC review, the owner will be notified within ten (10) business days after the start of the review cycle date that the design has been approved, approved with stipulations or disapproved. The reasons for approval with stipulation .and disapproval will be clarified for the owner in writin.g and/or with drawings. If the VWARC does not contact the owner within ten (10) business days of the review commencement date, the application shall not be deemed "approved". Historic interpretation submittals must be supplemented with a written and/or graphic description of the historic precedent. • An application for withdrawal may be made without prejudice,. provided the request for withdrawal is made in writing to the VWARC. All variance requests pertaining to the VWARC approvals must be made in writing to the VWARC. Any variance granted shall be considered unique and will not set any precedent for future decisions. If an application has been denied, or the approval is subject to conditions that the owner feels are unacceptable, the owner may request a hearing before the VWARC to justify his/her position. The VWARC will consider the arguments and facts presented by the owner and notify the owner of its final decision within ten (10) days of the hearing. Section 3. Twelve Months to be Completed. Any structure to be erected in accordance with an approval so given must be. erected and completed within one year from the date of approval. If construction of a structure is not commenced within one year after approval, new approval must be obtained. If any structure is commenced and is not completed in accordance with the plans and specifications within one year, the • Directors of the Association, at their option, may take such action as may be necessary, in their judgment, to improve the appearance so as to make the -30- property harmonious with other properties and to comply.with these Covenants, including completion of the exterior of the combination thereof, or removing the uncompleted structure-or similar operations. The amount of any expenditure made in so doing shall be an obligation of the owner. A lien on the property may be recorded and shall be enforceable by an action at law. In lieu thereof, the Association may take such action as is available by law, including an injunction, or action for damages. Section 4. Liability and Variances. Neither the Association, the Declarant,..the Board of Directors, the VWARC nor the individual members thereof, may be held liable to any person for any damages for any action taken pursuant to these Covenants, including but not limited to, damages which may result from correction, amendment, changes or rejection of plans and specifications, the issuance of approvals, or any delays associated with such action on the part of the Board of Directors. Further, the Committee may, upon application, grant a variance from the Architectural Regulations, provided that the spirit of these Covenants is complied with, and .provided that notice of the nature of the variance is mailed • (certified) 'to adjacent lot owners within a 100' radius, at least seven days before the variance is approved in order to give the other owners a chance to comment and have input to the VWARC. However, the Committee shall have the duty and power to make the final decision on the granting of the variance, without any liability being incurred or damages being assessed due to any decision of the Committee. Within all section of these covenants, when a variance is indicated that it may be granted, the variance must be requested.and approved by either the Valley West Architectural Review Committee and / or the Bozeman City Commission depending on whether the variance is from the Covenants or from the current City Zoning Ordinance or both.. . Section 5. Procedure. STEP 1 : SKETCH DESIGN REVIEW In addition to verifying the required setbacks, this review checks the designs for correct interpretation of the Architectural Regulations. Form Required: Form A - Sketch Review Application. Minimum Drawings Required on 18" x 24".(maximum size) sheets: -31 - r Site Plan (1/16"or 1/8"= 1'-0") showing: North arrow. 'Property lines, setback lines, sidewalks and easements.with dimensions Building footprints with entries; porches ..and balconies delineated, and overhangs as dashed lines. Dimensioned drives, walks, gardens, etc.. Elevation of first floor. Site contours beginning at the curb. Landscape concept plan including boulevard trees located. Adjacent property structures and landscaping. Floor Plans (1/8"= 1'-0"scale or larger) showing: Room use-and dimension. All windows and doors with operation and swings shown. All overhangs of floors and roofs as dashed lines. Overall dimensions. Gross enclosed square footage. Elevations .(I/8" = V-0" scale or larger) showing: Porches, balconies, doors and windows. Principal materials and colors rendered and specified. Height of each floor, eaves and roof peak dimensioned from the ground floor. Overall height from average grade. Roof pitches. . Roof Plan (1/8"= 1'-0') STEP 2: CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW This review checks the construction documents for compliance with the VWARC and verifies that. the previous VWARC recommendations have been incorporated. Conformity to applicable local regulations and building codes, as well as obtaining appropriate permits is the responsibility of the architect and/or builder. Form Required: Form B - Construction Design Review Application Minimum. Drawings Required: Site Plan (1/8"= 1'-0'J showing: • North arrow. Property lines and setback lines with dimensions -32- • Buildingfootprints with entry area delineated and overhangs shown as dashed P rY g lines. Garden walls, fence -lines, location, height and material quality of retaining walls. Water, electric and sewer service. Grading plan. Location of streets. Location, dimensions and materials for walks and drives. Limits of construction activity (no construction, traffic or storage of materials will be permitted beyond these limits). Exterior light locations and type Location of external equipment (electric meter, location of waste bins, etc.) Floors Plans (114"= 1'-0") showing: Foundation plan dimensioned. Room use labeled and rooms dimensioned. Wall, window and door openings dimensioned. Exterior walls dimensioned. All overhangs of floors and roofs as dashed lines. Overall dimensions. • Gross square footage. Elevations & Sections showing: Each Elevation at '/4' = 1'-0"with colors rendered of fronting street elevation. Major building sections at '/4' = 1'. Typical walls from ground to ridge at 3/" = 1' or larger. Typical porch section from ground to roof at 3/" = 1' or larger. Landscape Plan: Including plant listing and their.respective locations. Samples (1 set) as requested by VWARC: _ Color samples of each key building material, labeled as to specification and location. STEP 3: CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT Construction may not commence without the approval of the City of Bozeman Building Division, necessary permits obtained and fees collected. 'A copy of of Form B - .Construction Design Review Application .bearing the VWARC • approval letter must accompany City of Bozeman building permit applications. -33- • The VWARC reserves the right to inspect in the field for compliance during any stage of construction. The VWARC is empowered to enforce its policy as set forth in -the Architectural Regulations and Neighborhood Association's Declaration of Covenants, Conditions' & Restrictions by any action, in law or equity, to ensure compliance.. STEP 4: FINAL INSPECTION A building may be occupied upon receipt of a City of. Bozeman occupancy permit and Form C - Request for Final Inspection bearing the VWARC stamp of . approval. STEP 5: MINOR CHANGES It is anticipated that owners may wish to make improvements or modifications to their buildings or property during initial construction or at a future date. A change may be executed upon receipt of Form D - Application.for Change(s) bearing the VWARC stamp of approval. -34- FORM A SKETCH DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION LOT NUMBER: Owner: Address: Telephone: FAX: BUILDER: Firm: Address: Telephone: FAX: ARCHITECT: Firm: Address: Telephone: FAX: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Firm: Address: Telephone: FAX: INFORMATION 1. Design is based on Historic Interpretation O Yes O No 2. Are any variances from the Valley West Code being requested under this application? O Yes O No -35 • If yes, please describe the variance and the reason for it. 3. Drawings submitted .(please check): O Site Plan O Floor Plans . O Roof Plan O Elevations O Landscape Concept Plan Submitted by: Date: Signature: -36= FORM B • CONSTRUCTION DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION -LOT NUMBER: Owner: Address: Telephone: . ..FAX: BUILDER: Firm: Address: Telephone: . FAX: ARCHITECT: Firm: • Address: Telephone: FAX: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Firm: Address: Telephone: FAX: Drawings submitted (please check): O Site Plan O Floor Plans O Roof Plan O Elevations & Sections O Samples & Cut Sheets O Rendered Elevation O Landscape Plan • Submitted by: Date: Signature: -37- FORM C • APPLICATION FOR FINAL INSPECTION LOT NUMBER: Owner: Address: Telephone: FAX: BUILDER: Firm: Address: Telephone: FAX: CERTIFICATION: I do hereby certify in good faith that the contracted • structure on said Lot conforms to. the Codes and the Construction Documents as approved by the VWARC. All site work, landscaping, cleaning, removal of temporary utilities, and repair of damage to right-of- way and common areas has been implemented. Signature of Owner: Date: APPROVAL: VWARC date of Final I.nspection: , VWARC Approval Signature: • -38- FORM D • APPLICATION FOR CHANGE(S) LOT NUMBER: Owner: Address: Telephone: FAX: BUILDER: Firm: Address: Telephone: FAX: ARCHITECT: Firm: • Address: Telephone: FAX: Change Description: (attach sketch of proposed change) Reason for Change: Submitted by: Date: • Signature: -39- • ARTICLE VIII VALLEY WEST ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Section 1. Function of the Valley:West Architectural Review Committee. (VWARC). To encourage the architectural harmony of VWARC the.developer and all property owners are bound by regulations defined in the. Valley West Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, the Valley West code, and the design review process. To that end, no structure shall be erected or altered until Municipal, VWARC and any other required approvals have been obtained. Section 2. Scope of Responsibilities. The VWARC has the right to exercise control over all construction in the Valley West Planned Unit Development. It will also review all homeowner's alterations and modifications to existing structures (including but not limited to walls, painting, renovations, and landscaping). • Section 3. Enforcing Powers. Should a violation occur, the VWARC has the right to an injunctive relief, which requires the owner to stop, remove, and/or alter any improvements in a manner that complies with the standards established by the VWARC. Approval by the VWARC does not relieve an owner of his/her obligation to obtain any government approvals. If such approvals are required and are not obtained by the owner, the VWARC and/or the applicable government agency may take whatever actions are necessary against, the owner to force compliance. Section 4. Committee Members. The VWARC shall consist of individuals appointed by the President of the Homeowners Association. The VWARC will consist of a developer's representative, a member of the city planning staff, an architect, a landscape architect and an at-large member of the Home Owners Association. Section 5. Limitation of Responsibilities. The primary goal of the VWARC is to review the submitted applications, plans, specifications, materials, and samples in order to determine if the -40- proposed structure conforms to the Valley West Architectural Regulations. • The VWARC does not assume responsibility for the following: The structural adequacy, capacity, or. safety features of the proposed structure or improvement. Soil erosion, ground water levels, non-compatible or unstable soil conditions. Compliance with any or all building codes,, safety requirements, and governmental laws, regulation or ordinances. ARTICLE IX PROPERTY USE Section 1 . No hunting of, shooting at or harassing of birds, animals or any wildlife will be permitted. Skunks, gophers and rodents may be trapped; however, poison may not be used. Section 2. No livestock, poultry or other animals, except dogs, cats or . • small in-house pets, are permitted on the properties.. All dogs, cats and other pets shall be strictly controlled by their owners so as not to annoy or interfere with the use of the properties by the other owners and to prevent any interference or harassment of wild birds or animals in the subdivision or on surrounding or adjacent properties. Dogs and cats shall be kept on the owner's property and shall not be allowed to roam free. Section 3. City sewer and water lines, power, natural gas, cable television, and telephone primary service lines are provided to each lot. However, each lot owner is responsible,for the costs of connecting to the main utility lines to.his or her improvements from the primary line near his or her lot, including any additions to the primary line that may be required by location of the improvements on the lot. All utility lines shall be underground. Section 4. No signs shall be erected on the property or lot thereof, except to identify the owner of the property. "For Sale" signs shall. be allowed upon the lot being sold. A sign may be placed at the entrance(s) to the subdivision to identify the subdivision and/or • neighborhood. - 41 - • Section 5. If the applicable zoning now or hereafter requires .a greater setback or contains other more restrictive provisions regarding the placement of buildings, the Zoning Code shall control as if incorporated herein. . Section 6. .Any lot may be subject to the declarations of a condominium property formed and filed. The additional_restrictions and requirements of any such form condominium do not, in any way, relieve the lot or owner. from compliance with all restrictive covenants stated herein. Section 7. All zoning, land use regulations and all other laws, rules and regulations of any government or agency. under whose jurisdiction the land lies are considered to be part of these Covenants and enforceable hereunder; and all of the owners of said lands shall be bound by-such laws, rules and regulations. In the event there is a conflict between the Covenants and the applicable zoning, the most restrictive provision of either the Covenants or the zoning shall control. Section 8. There are reserved,. as shown in the plat and. as' may • otherwise be reserved, easements . for the purposes ' of constructing, operating, maintaining, enlarging, reducing, removing, laying or relaying lines and related facilities and equipment for utilities, including, but not limited to, those providing gas, communication and electrical power. Fencing, hedges and other items allowed by the Covenants may be placed along and in the easements as long as the intended use of such easements are not prevented. ARTICLE X OPEN SPACE AND COMMON AREA Section l . Use.of Open Space and Common Area. No property owner shall have the right to occupy or possess any of the open space and common area by reason of owning a lot in Valley West Subdivision. Section 2. Active Parks and Bron.ken Memorial Park. Bronken Memorial Park shall be maintained by the City of Bozeman and • other organizations in perpetuity. t -42- The Association shall maintain the active parks, including the surrounding • sidewalks, during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers .wetland monitoring period (seven. years). The City of Bozeman shall maintain the active parks thereafter. The.Owner's parks shall be maintained by the Association. Section 3. Parkways. Parkways, providing pedestrian .access to and from the residential areas are intended for passive pedestrian use and shall be maintained by the . Association. No motorcycles, snowmobiles or similar means of transportation are permitted. Section 4. Boulevard trails. Boulevard trails, located along Babcock Street, Ferguson ..:Avenue, Cottonwood Road and Durston Road shall be .maintained by the Association. No motorcycles, snowmobiles or similar means of transportation are permitted. Motorized vehicles are allowed exclusively for snow removal. • Section 5. Mandatory Requirements. uirements. The Open Space within Valley West as designated on a final plat or approved PUD site plan shall be preserved in perpetuity. The Board, among its other duties, shall establish assessments for the taxes, insurance, and maintenance of all open space, roads, easements, active parks under the control and authority of the Association, owners' parks and parkways. The Association shall be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes and maintenance of. recreation and other facilities in the Open Space areas. The assessments levied by the Board for the maintenance, upkeep, repair and operation of Open Space and other common areas like all other assessments, become a lien on each. lot within the Valley West. The Board, may in its discretion, adjust the assessments to meet the changing needs of the community and the areas serving the community. All open space and common area shall be maintained pursuant to.the adopted Open Space Maintenance Plan for Valley West. -43- Section 6. Owners Right to Parking Area. Every owner shall have the right to use the designated parking areas. The owners right to use,the parking areas shall be appurtenant to and shall pass wit the title to every lot subject to the following provisions: a. Parking shall be in compliance with the Bozeman City Ioning Ordinance. b. The right of the Association to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of parking areas for the overall benefit of the Association an its members including restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including, but not limited to, special sales events, merchandise display stands or tables, signs, fireworks, loud music and loud parties in the parking area. c. The right of the Association. to charge reasonable fees. for the disproportionate use by Owners or their guests or invitees of.the parking area. . d. The right of the Association to suspend the voting rights and right to use • the parking areas of any owner and/or occupant for any period during which any assessment against his or her lot or person remains unpaid and for any infraction of its published rules and regulations for any period' of time the Association deems necessary. Section 7. Nuisance. No Owner, guest or invitee may use or occupy the common area, trails, roads, open space, parking area or any lot in such a manner as to disturb; or interfere with the peaceful use, occupancy or enjoyment of any other: owner, guest or invitee of Valley West. Violations shall be enforced as provided for in Article XI of these Covenants. Section 8. Control and Management: The Association shall have the exclusive right and obligation to manage, control and maintain the Open Space and Common Area. Every lot owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the sidewalk located on, adjacent to and between the owner's lot and the nearest right-of-way. Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to snow and ice removal. -44- ARTICLE XI TERM, ENFORCEMENT, APPLICABILITY AND CHANGE Section 1 . The term of the provisions of these Covenants shall be binding for a term of fifteen (15) years from the date of these Covenants and may be modified, altered or amended during that period only by the Declarant at the Declarant's sole option. After the initial fifteen (15) year.. period, the Covenants should be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years not to exceed three (3) such extensions unless an instrument agreeing to amend, revoke or terminate these Covenants has been signed by the Owners of eighty (80) percent of the lots in .Valley West. Any covenant required as a condition of preliminary subdivision or PUD approval shall not be altered or amended,without the agreement of the governing body. Section 2. Enforcement of these. Covenants shall be by proceedings either at law or in equity against any person or persons violating, or attempting to violate, any Covenant; and the legal proceedings may either be to restrain violation of these Covenants, to recover damages, or both. • Should -any lawsuit or other legal proceeding be instituted by the Association or an owner against an owner alleged to have violated one or more of the provisions of these Covenants and should the Association or owner enforcing the provisions of the covenants be wholly or partially successful in such proceedings, the offending owner shall be obligated to pay the costs of such proceeding, including reasonable attorney's fees for all time associated with the action. Section 3. The failure of Declarant, the Association or an owner, to enforce any Covenant or restriction contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver or in any way prejudice the rights to later enforce.that Covenant, or any other Covenant thereafter, or to collect damages for any subsequent breach of Covenants. The waiver or approval of a variance of a Covenant provision by the Board of Directors, or non-action of the Association or Declarant in the event of a violation of a Covenant by a particular owner or lot, shall not . be deemed to delete or waive the Covenant or enforcement thereof as it pertains to other owners or lots. -45- • Section 4. Invalidation of any one of these Covenants by judgment or by .Court order shall in no way affect any of the other Covenants or provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. In any conveyance of the above described .real property,or of any lot thereon, it shall be sufficient to insert a provision in any deed or conveyance to the effect that the property is :subject to 'protective or restrictive Covenants without setting forth such restrictions and Covenants-, verbatim or in substance in said deed hor referring to the recording data. All of the above described real property and lots shall be subject to the restrictions and Covenants set forth herein, whether or not there is a specific reference to the same in a deed or conveyance. Section 6. A breach of any of the foregoing restrictions or Covenants shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed.of trust made in good faith and for value upon any lot or portion of the real property or any improvements thereon. However, the Covenants shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any subsequent owner whose title thereto was acquired by foreclosure, trustee sale or otherwise. Section 7.' After the initial fifteen year term for these covenants, the • provisions of these Covenants may be changed or amended or additional Covenants added, in whole or in part, by the Association upon approval of. two-thirds (2/3) of the votes of the Homeowners' Association at a meeting duly noticed and called for this purpose; provided that, the easements for roads, utilities and common areas shall not be changed without the unanimous consent of all of the owners affected by the change. The President or Vice-President shall execute and record the amendment, change or addition. with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. .Any change of these Covenants shall be effective upon the filing and. . recording of such an 'instrument in the office of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. Any change in these Covenants shall not affect existing structures and uses of the lots. -46- IN WITNES WHEREOF, Declarant has hereunto set its hand as of this • day of 1ALNU 2002. Managing Member STATE OF ) :ss. County of ) On this day of , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the State of , personally appeared..I being the Managing Member of Bozeman Lakes, LLC, known to me to be the persons that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have.hereunto set my hand and affixed.my • official seal as of the day and year i t above written. JEUNEErrEA.BTRADA Hor�mrwauc-miaow► OTARY PUB fort e St to Of J ICOPA cout�Tir. Residing n+y comet E�iree oansra g at My Commission expires -47- EXHIBIT"A" Valley West Subdivision PUD - Legal Description A Tract of land located in'the NE 1/4, and SE 1/4.Section 9; NW 1/4 and a- portion of the W 1/2 SW 1/4 Section 10, Township.2 South, Range 5 East P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of said Section 9 and the True Point of Beginning; Thence along the North line of said section, S 8904704" W a distance of 2643.78 feet to a point on the North line of said Section 9 and alsobeing' the North Quarter corner of said Section; Thence continuing along said Section, S 88004'24" W a distance of 1337.30 feet to the west one-sixteenth corner of Sections 4 and 9, and the Northeast corner of Certificate of Survey 1581.Tract 1; :• Thence along the East line of Certificate of Survey #1581 and the west one-sixteenth line of Section 9, S 00059'07"E a distance of 1341 .86 feet to the Northwest one-sixteenth corner of Section 9 and a Point being the Southeast corner of Certificate of Survey #1581 Tract 2; Thence along the northerly one-sixteenth line of Section 9, N 88028'22" E a distance of 1337.16 feet to the Center-North one-sixteenth corner of Section 9; Thence continuing along the Northerly one-sixteenth line of N 89019'43" E a distance of 1320.65 feet to the Northeast one-sixteenth corner of said section; Thence along the easterly one-sixteenth line, S 01002'11" W a distance of 1340.70 feet to the Center-east one-sixteenth corner of Section 9; . Thence along the East-west mid-section line, N 88052'19" E a'distance of 1319.50 feet to the East Quarter corner of said Section 9 and the northwest corner of Certificate Of Survey #1846 Tract 1 ; Thence along the East-west mid-section of Section 10, S 89*51'58" E a distance of 2668.01 feet to the Center Quarter and the northeast corner of Certificate of Survey # 1872 Tract A; Thence along the north-south mid-section line of Section 10, N 00028'03".E a distance of 2665.84 feet to the North Quarter corner; Thence along the north line of Section ION 89059'25" W a distance of • 738.56 feet to a point on the north line of Section 10 also being the northeast corner of Certificate of Survey # 1829 Parcel B; -48= 7 Thence along the east-line of said Survey through the following courses, S 00°10'31" E a distance of 881.78 feet to.the Southeast corner of said Survey; Thence along the so.uth.line, S 88030'24".W a distance of 639.06 feet to the Southwest corner of said Survey; Thence along jhe west line, N 00009'34" E a distance of 898.54 feet-to a point on the north line of Section 10 and also being the northwest corner . of Certificate of Survey #1829 Parcel B; Thence along the north line of Section 10, N 89059'25" W a distance of 621 .40 feet to a point on the north line of Section 10 and also being the northeast corner of Certificate of Survey 985 Tract 1; Thence along the east line of said survey through the following courses, S 01006'08" W a distance of 408.00 feet to a point being the Southeast corner of Certificate of Survey 985 Tract 1; Thence along the South line of said Survey, N 8905925" W a distance of 600.00 feet to the Southwest corner of said survey; Thence along the west-line, N 01006'08" E a distance of 408.00 feetJo a point on the north line of Section 10 and also being Northwest corner of Certificate of Survey # 985 Tract 1; Thence along the north line of Section 10, N 891,59'25"W a distance of. 45.01 feet to the True Point of Beginning. -49 t 16 s • . LIGHTING RESIDENTIAL (Single Family / Duplex lots) LIGHTING l. All exterior residential lighting must be Incandescent. 2. Builder or Owner shall hardwire lighting on garages that abut alleyways. Such fixtures shall contain a photoelectric cell. Owner shall at all times keep photoelectric cell within the lamp in good working order such that the fixture can be illuminated during all periods of darkness. All exterior lighting of all lots shall be of such focus and intensity so as to not cause disturbance of adjacent lots. 3. Obtrusive flood lighting is prohibited. 4. Clear glass or exposed bulb (non-cutoff) fixtures are discouraged. STREET LIGHTING The Valley West Planned Unit Development proposes to light street and significant • pedestrian intersections with Kim Lighting "Archetype" outdoor cutoff luminaries with metal halide bulbs (see attached manufacturers specifications). Special Improvement Lighting Districts will be formed as the project develops. Pole heights will vary as conditions warrant,with a maximum pole height of 30' at main intersection and roadways and 24' on secondary streets. Street light fixtures will be spaced approximately 300' o.c. between intersections on longer blocks. PARKING LOT (Townhouse / Parking Area) LIGHTING Kim Lighting "Archetype" outdoor cutoff luminaries with metal halide bulbs (see attached manufacturers specifications) are required, with a maximum fixture height of 20'. uesign Logic It-1-hroughout history,design philosophy has Arm-mounted luminaires often look overly massive and ,dergone many changes,sometimes unbalanced. The Archetype's slanted nose,undercut ballast . creating form that disguises function while compartment and oval arm combine to reinforce and balance its other times adhering to a strict expression of directional nature and soft form. the object's function and purpose.The new age of design logic is more than a rigid form- follows-function philosophy which can sometimes generate ugly objects. Design logic adheres to the creation of form by function,but also answers to a higher calling demanding an overall shape that is a single, � � sk unified,aesthetically pleasing design Round poles . ." ��N,� y provide the statement.The Archetype is the fast outdoor optimum r p +r g o timum luminaire to exemplifythe philosophy off � � complementary P P Y ,F � :. design logic while also providing the shape to necessary compatibility with its Mom" v A The Archetype. m.s• :su Square poles are surrounding architecture.It is a blend of design and engineering The Archetype's directional form is further influenced by its also available optics A downward and outward light throw is expressed by that makes a bold and refreshing corresponding fixture shape and articulation of the optical new statement about cutoff lighting. chamber. .Function is synonymous with form under Cooling ribs increase surface area the concept of design logic. Every by 100%allowing rapid heat engineering factor must contribute directly to dissipation by radiation from the the evolvement of shape and mechanics. fixture top. The Archetype reflects every design factor that must be accounted for:environmental effects, lighting performance,installation ease, serviceability and internal heat dissipation. The die cast housing is a homogeneous body in which every feature has a functional purpose.For example,H.I.D.lamps can ° Heat t efficiently produce tremendous heat within the �.h radure t from the housing, et the are operated future top and Y Y l� w �� _'' carried away by by temperature- natural breezes. sensitive electrical , components.Traditional methods of �3 _, 11 controlling heat were unacceptable �` " TTIM, in The Archetype because of its compact size.A combination of surface Secondary beat source. radiators and a solid barrier wall are employed The ballast produces beat to keep operating temperatures well below Pri,nary heat An extra-lhick while adjacent capacitor the allowable for maximum component life. source.A 400 Watt barrier wall and ignitor components O ptical compartment has been totally lamp produces separates the must operate below 90*C ,m the electrical compartment bulb temperatures optical chamber The electrical compartment P also ventilates through the inch �all wire penetrations.With full door as high�u 4U0 C. from the electrical mounting arm. frame and lens gasketing,there is no compartment.ticamThe possibility of moisture,insects or air optical!chamber is po ty totally sealed contamination entering the optical chamber. 2 K 1 M LIGHTING Aq":d4 ics is a science normally d with aircraftand automobile esign.Yet,luminaire shape is the single most important factor that determines pole size. �- s Furthermore,poles are oftenti�` � more expensive than huninaires,which means that a reduction in pole size can produce AR ModeL• ' a significant savings in Overall cost.Fixture Coefficient of drag—.70 ; E.P.A. —1.2 u weight has little influence on pole size 80 m.p.h. w-nd force—32.7Ji-lbs. because wind loading produces the greatest lateral force.The aerodynamic shape of The Archetype generates far less wind loading than a"shoebox" A Shoebox with same luminaire thereby permitting overall dimensions.- lighter poles to be used when available.The aerodynamic shape also improves the effectiveness of the cooling ribs by keeping the air flow against them for a Coefficient of drag—1.2 longer period of time. E.P.A.—2.0 80?n. b. wind force—56.3/t lbs. a rchitecture is the backdrop that controls the design of an architectural luminaire.Buildings with singular t .,xl 4ti geometry demand lighting fixtures that echo the same simple form,traditionally square or round.However,much of today's architecture is eclectic,combining square,round and neo- xcat . 4 ri ;� �-��-� - classic shapes into a single structure.The Archetype is the first outdoor luminaire specifically designed to be eclectic in form and outwardly expressive of function.Yet,this variety in shape and purpose has been beautifully sculptured into a single unified luminaire design that makes a strong statement for both aesthetics and engineering. Jr s c. , Si:P: d b 7be Archetype's eclectic form is evident in these three views.From . the side,its function is clearly Side View stated The bottom view 'M is rectilinear yet the overall ' length is a simple ball cylinder.All elements combine into a soft, unified j a x rk_ sculptural form that a will integrate with virtually any setting, Bottom View whether it is architecture or " landscape. Front View ,Yt K I M 3 LIGHTING Specifi cations. - 49 Model Mogul Base - 150 to 400 Watt on: I- Listed to U.S. and Canadian safety standards. # anuiacturer shall be registered to ISO 9001. ,fi 9 � sx 8„ r Housing: One piece We Gast aluminum with integral cooling 221/2„ —� finsover the optical chamber and electrical compartment. Solid Max.fixture wt ,..,m. . barrier wall separates optical and electrical compartments. . (400HPS)-¢5 Ills. T. Double-thick wall with gussets on the support-arm mounting end. Housing forms a half-cylinder shape with 550 front face plane providing a recess to allow a flush single-latch detail. All 16 hardware is stainless steel or electro-zinc plated steel. Lens Frame and Latch: One piece die cast aluminum lens frame with Y minimum depth around the gasket flange.Integral hinges with stainless steel pins provide no-tool mounting and removal from housing. Single die cast aluminum cam-latch provides positive locking and sealing of the optical chamber by a one piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket. Clear 3/16" thick: tempered glass lens retained by eight stainless steel clips with full silicone gasketing around the perimeter. - Typell . ' Reflector Module: Specular Alzak' optical segments rigidly p 7ype vi mounted in an aluminum frame which attaches to housing as a one piece module. Reflector module is field-rotatable increments. All HPS sockets are porcelain mogul base KV. MH sockets are pin-oriented and include a molded S* (amp stabilizer. All sockets are factory prewired to a Forward l�' rwar ' quid..,jsconnect plug and include a wire seal through the Tbrriu` Type Sq barrier wall. Available in four light distributions, all interchangeable within the same housing. Warning.Fixtures must be Electrical Module: All electrical components are UL and CSA grounded in accordance with po local codes or the National recognized,mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with ° Electrical Code.Failure to do quick-disconnect plugs. Electrical Module attaches to housing so may result in serious with no-tool hinges and latches, accessible by opening the lens personal injury. frame only. All ballasts are high power factor rated for -20°F. starting. For all T standard Support Arm: One piece extruded aluminum with pole mounts, 6„ t field splices internal bolt guides and fully radiussed top and bottom. —J.. are made at Luminaire-to-pole attachment is by internal draw bolts, the pole top. and includes a pole reinforcing plate with wire strain ��J relief.Ann is circular cut for specified round pole. 8" 12„ 1 Finish: Housing, lens frame, latch and support arm are Powder coating 2.5 mfl matching Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint nominal thickness. available in black, dark bronze, light gray or white. Powder , coati is 2.5 .mil nominal thickness, and all components are " ` Cist known a conversion coating. � a p � Best knowr:preparation of thoroughly iaeaned and primed with a protective chromate' �;rr =; *•_ aluminum forpaint adhesion co . nion coating prior to powder coating.See copy at right. and retardation of oxidation. Aluminum 14 K 1 M LIGHTING Wahl Mounting (For poured concrete walls only) Modified -i,It" support arm with side access hole.to allo Id splices within wall embedment ?.';; the ann.Wall embedment bracket provid ccept draw-bolts. o �^� ,� l»acke►fi r easy o tU„" positioning and Trim plate provided to cover wall embedded J-box, finished to o 5 g ., ti` sec7cringdu►ing match fixture and arm. =•r u � concrete pour. J-&ir in teall by others. 3 ic'draw'bolt centers. ,36onal Photocell Receptacle:Factory prewired receptacle ..lstalled directly above electrical compartment with full NL�tIEI base photocells mount directly gasketing around the perimeter. For multiple fixture mountings above electrical compartment. (250W or less),one fixture has a photocell receptacle to operate (I (' I I Photocells by other& the others. Four 40OW fixtures require two fixtures with =tea t photocell receptacles.NEMA base photocells by others- Optional Polycarbonate Shield:One piece vacuum formed Note:May be used clear UV stabilized polycarbonate enclosure replaces z with 40OW HPS in standard tempered glass lens.Fully gasketed cylindrical enclosure n . outdoor locations with 55°back Face to match fixture housing.250 Watt maximum where ambient air (see note at right). CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is -% T i temperature during / 4' i' fixture operation anticipated to be high. Useful life is limited by UV discoloration `� 1 will not exceed 85°F. from sunlight and metal halide lamps. Polycarbonate Shield Optional Houseside Shield: (For AR2, AR3 and AR4 only) Stamped aluminuu shield with bypass louvers for streetside light. Louvers ,block houseside light from lamp. Clear i • ' anodized finish.Attaches to lens frame interior on any four sides " to insure correct orientation with reflector.Black anodized panel added to reflector to reduce houseside reflections.Use with clear lamps only,effectiveness is reduced with coated lamps. Houseside Shield .L Optional Tamper-Resistant Latch:Standard die cast latch is nrovided with a captive 10-32 stainless steel flat socket-head rew to prevent unauthorized opening.Note:Required only for Captive stainless andal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by steel 10-32 flat ; t T a unauthorized persons. socket-bead screw. ;.� � •-; ���� �;. Optional Vertical Slipf tter Mounts:Allows AR model with standard support arm to be mounted to poles having a 2" pipe size tenon(23/s"O.D.x 41/?min. length).Any mounting configtr ration can be used(lA,2B,21,3T or 4C).4"square or round cast aluminum with flush cap, secured by (4) 31s" stainless steel set point allen screws,finished to match fixture and ann. µ ;.` VerticalStainless flne Pole with 2"pipe size Slip,jitter • '-*-steel set->♦ tenon by other& Mount K " screws. by Kim. SpecW OIfions for Street Lighting Square Detail Round Optional Terminal Block: (For field wire connections) 85 AMP,600 Volt box clamp terminal block mounted to housing Terminal Block inside electrical compartment. Accepts #14-4 wire. Factory prewired to ballast module disconnect plug. o Optional Air Filter: Allows optical chamber to ventilate, Air Filter filtering out all air particles above 500 microns. Multi4ayer disc assembly mounted in solid.wall between optical compartment Davit arm with and latch cavity. 2'ptpe size fixture mount i � ��.,�µ. � r••_r"�'� �. by others F, ,Ptional Horizontal Slipfitter Mount: Cast alumin `' '�`t* . Horizontal "�..- clamp-type slipfitter mount with single set screw anti-rotatio Su nnerMount lock Bolts to housing from inside electrical compartment usin by Kim. mounting holes for standard support arm. Fitter clamps to any ; horizontal pole davit-arm with 2" pipe size mounting end ' (23/s"O.D.). 1 M 15 LIGHTING Specifications -,BAR Model • Medium Base - 70 to 175 Watt cation: UL Listed to U.S. and Canadian safety-standards. nanufacturer shall be registered to ISO 9001. kO _U 1. Housing: One piece die cast aluminum with integral cooling —17i1s" � fins over the optical c amber and electrical compartment. Solid Max.future:ut barrier wall separates optical and electrical ompartments. (I5OHPS) -251bs. Double-thick wall with gussets on the support-arm mounting end. Housing forms a half-cylinder shape with 58° front face 12" plane providing a recess to allow a flush single-latch detail. All hardware is stainless steel or electro-zinc plated steel. ILI ' Lens Frame and Latch: One piece die cast aluminum lens frame with 1"minimum depth around the gasket flange.Integral hinges with stainless steel pins provide no-tool mounting and removal from housing. Single die cast aluminum cam-latch provides positive locking and sealing of the optical chamber by a one piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket. Clear 3/h," thick tempered glass lens retained by eight stainless steel clips with frill silicone gasketing around the perimeter. Reflector Module: Specular Alzak* optical segments rigidly mounted in an aluminum frame which attaches to housing as a one piece module. Reflector module is field-rotatable in 900 increments. All sockets are porcelain medium base rated facto rewired to a quick-disconnect plug including a factory P q P g g :... . -1 through the barrier wall. Y''�' � _ •` �";' Fgtrunrd� '.'- Electrical Module:All electrical components are UL and CSA i recognized,mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with _ warning:Fixtures must be quick-disconnect plugs. Electrical Module attaches to housing �:, grounded in accordance with with no-tool hinges and latches, accessible by opening the lens '° local codes or the National frame only. All ballasts are hi power factor rated for -20T. Electrical Code.Failure to do so Y high Po may result in serious personal starting. injury. For all Su Arm: One extruded aluminum with internal standanipole Y4" Support m: piece 1 � mounts,field 4 bolt guides and fully radiussed top and bottom.Lutninaire to-pole splices are attachment is by internal draw bolts, and includes a pole made at the reinforcing plate with wire struin relief. Arm is circular cut for pole top. specified round pole. Finish: Housing, lens frame, latch,,and support arm are matching Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint Powder coating,2.5 mil available in black, dark bronze, light gray or white. Powder nominal thickness coating is 2.5 mil nominal thickness, and all components are thoroughly cleaned and primed with a protective chromate' ' � ' Chromate conversion coating.�- l~ Best known preparation of conversion coating prior to powder coating.See copy at right- ,;; aluminzrn:for patnt adhesion ' - and retardation of oxidation. Aluminunz 16 K 1 M LIGHTING All Mounting. Die cast aluminum adapter plate provided for :unting to 3"or 4" J-boxes. Fixture mounting bolts retained in `x 3^or 4^fliox adapter plate. Quick-disconnect plug and wiring provided to - by others on allow field connections prior to fixture mounting. Adapter plate 4zq" at left. is finished to match the fixture. CAUTION:J-Box in wall must - - p provide adequate fixture support. See National Electrical Code - r Adapter sections 370-13, 17 and 410-14, 16. plate by Kitt. Optional Photocell: (Not available on wall mounts). Factory Photocell Note:Photocell available on installed in electrical compartment with fully.gasketed sensor one sensor pole-inounted fixtures only. fixture end Facing pole. For multiple fixture mountings on pole, one fixture is supplied'with a photocell to operate the others. Optional Polycarbonate Shield: One piece vacuum formed clear UV stabilized polycarbonate enclosure .replaces standard ,._ { tempered glass lens.Fully gasketed cylindrical enclosure with 58° back face to match fixture housing. CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. Useful life is limited by UV 3^ discoloration from sunlight and metal halide lamps. Polycarbonate Sbield Optional Houseside Shield: Stamped aluminum shield with bypass louvers for streetside light. Louvers block houseside light from lamp. Black anodized finish.Attached to lens frame interior on any of four sides to insure correct orientation with reflector. Black anodized panel added to .reflector to reduce houseside tections. Note: Use with clear lamps only; effectiveness is �HousesideSbfeld lured with coated lamps. Optional Tamper-Resistant Latch:Standard die cast latch is Captive stainless M, provided with a captive 10-32 stainless steel flat socket-head steel 10-32 flat screw to prevent unauthorized opening. Note: Required only for socket-head screw. vandal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by �§ unauthorized persons. Optional Vertical S(lipfitter Mounts: Allows SAR model sR, p:w i with standard support arm to be mounted to poles having a 2 pipe size tenon(23le O.D.-x 4VY'min.length).Any mounting con- Sk yv t figuration can be used(I SA,2SB,2SL,3ST,3SY or 4SC).4"square ? Vertical Stainless or round cast aluminum with flush ca secured b 4 /a stain Slipfitter c°K.: ;; steel sett P� Y( ) 3 " Pole with 2"pipe size ° � Mount j v, screws. less steel set point alien screws, finished to match fixture and tenon by others.—�°: by Kim. Square Detail Round Davit arm witb Optional Horizontal Slipfitter Mount: Cast aluminum 2"pipe size clamp-type slipfitter mount with single set screw anti-rotation fixture mount lock. Bolts to housing fiom inside electrical compartment usin1 y by others. mounting holes for standard support arm. Fitter clamps to horizontal pole davit-ami with 2" pipe size mounting nd ,. (2v8 O.D.). ntal S pipfttterMount � 4 by Kim. K I M 17 LIGHTING • 17 1e • Durston Road Currently a County-maintained facility, Durston Road is identified as a minor arterial in The Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update. The paved roadway width between North 19th Avenue and Flathead Avenue varies between 22-feet and 24-feet, with no useable shoulders or curb and gutter. By annexation agreement, the Valley West Subdivision landowners paved Durston from Flathead Avenue west to Cottonwood Road to a 24-feet wide County standard. It is built to a County gravel standard from Cottonwood Road to the west boundary of the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development. Evaluation of traffic counts collected on Durston Road, east of the Valley West development indicate the roadway is currently operating at a level of service C. The 2001 Transportation Plan Update indicates that without improvements the corridor will develop capacity problems during the 20-year planning period. Capacity issues surrounding Durston Road surfaced over the past decade as development pressures along the corridor increased. To deal with this, the City is currently making efforts to create a special improvement district (SID) to upgrade the roadway to a three-lane minor arterial standard in accordance with the Bozeman Area Transportation Plan. The limits of these improvements are from North 19th Avenue west to Fowler Road, extended. When these • improvements are completed, it is expected that the level of service on Durston Road, with a fully developed Valley West Subdivision and other developments in the area, will be acceptable through the design year of 2020. Details of the analysis of Durston Road are provided in the Traffic Impact Study for Valley West Planned Unit Development Subdivision, which is included with this submittal. It is anticipated that the SID process will move steadily forward, with construction likely to occur prior to the year 2004. The Applicant recognizes that the need to improve Durston Road directly affects the development of the Valley West Subdivision and, as a consequence, intends to fully cooperate with the City to improve the road to a minor arterial standard. A considerable degree of planning is needed to determine the geometrics of the road and timing of the improvements, prior to identifying how the improvements will be funded. Some of this necessary planning effort is currently underway, with the initial step being the effort to create the above-mentioned SID. However, City may not wish to fully fund the improvements to Durston Road with an SID. That portion of the proposed construction that can be identified as "capacity expanding" may be funded outside of the SID. Ideally, this capacity expanding funding will come from street impact fees. At this stage of the planning effort for the Valley West Planned Unit Development, specific improvements to Durston Road needed' as a direct • consequence of this subdivision have not been fully identified. At a minimum, improvements to Durston Road adjacent to the subdivision will occur with the 1 • i phased development of the project. The improvements will need to be consistent with the results of the planning effort currently being undertaken by the City. ; • Based on the Traffic Impact Study recommendations and the phasing schedule for the Valley West Subdivision, improvements to Durston Road adjacent to the subdivision should be constructed with Phase 7. The development schedule for the overall Valley West Subdivision is provided in the section entitled "Development Schedule." Following are three possible funding scenarios to complete the improvements to Durston Road. At this time, the Applicant offers these scenarios to initiate communication with the City to address the needs of Durston Road. It is anticipated that the actual means and methods to make the improvements will evolve as development in the area occurs. The Applicant hereby requests to be an integral participant in the planning of the overall improvement of Durston Road. Funding Scenario 1: Under this scenario the City will continue to move forward with its current efforts to create an SID for the improvements between North 19th Avenue and Fowler Road, extended. The Applicant will not be involved in this effort under the current plan. The Applicant will pursue the creation of another SID to improve the south half of Durston Road from Fowler Road, extended, to the western • boundary of the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development. The City can readily assess the properties to the south of Durston Road currently within the City limits. Because the properties on the north side of Durston in this segment are in the County, full improvements to the north side of Durston Road will likely need to be addressed as the properties are annexed to the City. Funding Scenario 2: Under this scenario, the Applicant will request that the City expand the limits of the proposed SID for Durston Road from Fowler Road, extended, to Ferguson Avenue. The Applicant is willing to participate financially, at a fair and reasonable level, in the costs of the initial planning and creation of the SID. Costs directly related to the improvements will be assessed through the SID against the properties within the SID boundary. The Applicant will make necessary improvements to Durston Road from Ferguson west to the west edge of the subdivision as part of the phased construction of the subdivision. • 2 • As with Scenario 1, the improvements west of Fowler Road, extended, will essentially entail only the south half of the road for properties currently within the City limits. Funding Scenario 3: Under this scenario, the City will create a separate SID to improve Durston Road from Fowler Road, extended, to Ferguson Avenue. Again, the Applicant is willing to participate financially, at a fair and reasonable level, in the costs of the initial planning and creation of the SID. Costs related directly to the improvements will be assessed through the SID against the properties within the SID boundary. The Applicant will make necessary improvements to Durston Road, adjacent to the Valley West Subdivision, as part of phased construction of the subdivision. The , improvements west of Ferguson Avenue will essentially entail only the south half of the road for properties currently within the City limits. To re-Iterate, these options are offered to start further communication with the City to address the needs of Durston Road, with the actual means and methods to make and fund the improvements being finalized . as • development in the area occurs. The Applicant also believes that the low level of service on Durston Road is not inherent to this project specifically. To a large degree, the problems associated with Durston Road have evolved over time as a result of prior developments and the fact that jurisdiction of the road has been shared by the City and the County. Because Durston Road is functionally' classified as a minor arterial, these problems can be considered to be a community-wide concern. With this said, the Applicant believes it is reasonable to suggest that the City facilitate providing a portion of the necessary funding from others to complete the improvements that will allow Durston Road to become a minor arterial that will serve not only the Valley West Subdivision, but also the broader community. • 3 is • Surface WaterMetlands This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning . Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Surface Water. Mappiriq. Existing natural Surface Water features within the Valley West Subdivision include the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch (M-B Ditch), Baxter Ditch, and Baxter Creek. Artificial water systems are primarily limited to drainage ditches along roadways. These surface water features are illustrated on the exhibit entitled 'Water Course Map for Valley West Subdivision. Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. The Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch flows south to north through the site approximately midway between Ferguson Avenue and Cottonwood Road. It is a perennial waterway that does serve downstream irrigation users. The irrigation source is the Farmer's Canal, immediately south of Huffine Lane. In the fall of 1999 the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch channel was enhanced to function as a natural stream as part.of the wetlands mitigation plan for the Valley West Subdivision. The enhancements involved re-contouring the banks, adding terraces, pools, and riffles, and revegetating the new bank sections. • A culvert crossing of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch will be required for the future extension of Cascade Street. The Valley West drainage plan calls for a 58'/2" x 36" RCPA (Reinforced Concrete Pipe, Arched) culvert to be installed at the crossing. It will be necessary to obtain a 310 permit prior to any work within the stream channel. AI of the-stream:setbackxand-ditch-easement--requirements-are-located--withinzan-3 <open-space-corridor.:along--the_Mz-B--Ditch. The minimum width of this corridor, as required by the approved Corps of Engineers 404 permit, is 100 feet. The proposed corridor exceeds this requirement at all locations. A flood hazard evaluation of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch is provided with the Valley West Subdivision Drainage Plan, included with this submittal. Baxter Creek. Baxter Creek flows south to north between Cottonwood Road and the west boundary of the property. It also is a perennial waterway that provides irrigation & spring water to downstream users. The source of irrigation flow is the Farmer's Canal. Baxter Creek will be located within park/open space boundaries. All of the stream setback and ditch easement requirements will be within the designated open space. The Baxter Creek channel will be enhanced as part of the mitigation plan • approved by the Corps of Engineers in the original 404 permit for Valley West 1 • a Subdivision. The enhancements will involve regrading and revegetating the banks to provide bank stabilization and to reduce erosion. Floodplain terraces • will be constructed to improve the channel's ability to contain flood flows. The fisheries will be enhanced through development of pool and run habitat. A 310 permit will be required prior to any construction within the stream channel. The long-term effect will be improved fish habitat, water quality, and vegetation cover and diversity. The enhancement of Baxter Creek is to be completed by fall of 2008. A flood hazard evaluation of Baxter Creek is provided with the Valley West Subdivision Drainage Plan, included with this submittal. Baxter Ditch. The Baxter Ditch, distinct from Baxter Creek, flows through the property adjacent to Cottonwood Road, on its west side. This ditch was relocated to its current alignment as part of the wetland mitigation plan. It serves primarily to provide drainage through the property. The Baxter Ditch is located within a 30-foot wide ditch maintenance easement. A 35-foot watercourse setback will be provided from the ordinary high water mark and any residential or commercial structures. Subdivision streets will cross the Baxter Ditch at five locations as shown on the Valley West Subdivision Drainage Plan. Culverts will be installed to make the crossings. It will be necessary to obtain 310 permits for any construction work within the stream channel. • A flood hazard evaluation of the Baxter Ditch is provided with the Valley West Subdivision Drainage Plan, included with this submittal. Ferguson Drain Ditch. The Ferguson Drain Ditch is an unnamed watercourse paralleling the west side of Ferguson Road. It was constructed in conjunction with Ferguson Road to provide drainage through the property from the south. The Ferguson Ditch will be replaced with a storm water pipe as the subdivision is constructed. The pipe will be located within the Ferguson Avenue Parkway. The parkway will be owned and maintained by the Valley West Homeowner's Association. A drainage easement is provided on the existing Valley West Subdivision Plat. Pipe sizing and preliminary design of the pipe are provided with the Valley West Subdivision Drainage Plan, included with this submittal. Wetlands. A wetland delineation was completed on the property in fall 1994. The final wetland report and 404 permit application were submitted to the Corps of Engineers in January 1998 (a copy of the report is on file with the City of Bozeman). The Corps granted an Individual 404 Permit to Valley West, LLC, for Phase I of the project on May 4, 1998, and for Phase Illion July 23, 1998. The current owners of Valley West, LLC, applied for a modification to the existing 404 • 2 0 permit in May 2001. The primary design changes were a reduction in the number of impacted acres and a change in the location of a wetland complex from the west side of Baxter Creek to the'east side. In a letter dated September. 27, 2001, the Corps indicated that they intended to modify the permit as requested. The letter from Valley West, LLC, describing the proposed mitigation plan for the 404 permit modification and the September 27 response letter from the Corps of Engineers is included at the end of this section. The 404 permit required mitigation for impacts to low value wetlands, which will be drained or filled as a result of development. The mitigation plan calls for the creation of a shallow wetland complex and two.-lakes, relocation of the Baxter Ditch, and enhancement of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch and Baxter Creek. As identified above, some of the mitigation work is complete. The areas identified for wetland enhancement are illustrated on the Valley West Wetland Enhancement Plan included in this section. In addition to the steam corridors identified above, a wetland complex consisting of a series of shallow wetlands and waterfowl ponds will be created directly west of Bronken Park. The complex will be designed to incorporate nature trails with interpretive signs, waterfowl viewing areas, boardwalks, and benches. Two small lakes will also be constructed in the areas identified on the Valley West Wetland Enhancement Plan. Excavation of the lake near the western boundary of the site has started and can be seen on the 'Watercourse Map for Valley West Subdivision." These • lakes will be stocked with fish, providing numerous recreational opportunities for the public. All wetland enhancements will be located within public open space areas. • 3 To GALLATIN LL* ATO GAATIN r A R ER, 'i'@F RIVERWEI . r LLJ f' IJ.I ir SPRING ► cc Cc _r ' •S �� P �I °W �� ca ® Z 6 LLJ Q CA W 0LLI � . Q h, U I-- , m U) Ll. f . Y -TV i FoM FARMER'S y. Y FRoM FARMER'S CANAL CANAL WATER-COURSE MAP FOR VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION A]MORRISON 1/4 SEC. SECTION I TOWNSHIP RANGE WORTH MAIERLE,rxC. Q 0 100 200 400 rimer �� o� PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA CLIENT: GALLAnN COUNTY,MONTANA Scale:1°=20d FlE1D WORK: DATE 10/15/01 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/15/2001 • DIt\X G NAME (This Drawing Has Been Reduced) DRAWN 6Y• KS5 1•-200 SCALE: wsA��IYA aamu�\wrnty _ CHECKED aY'PF PROD t 3384-00 SHEET 1 OF 1 • Environmental Services 8353 Saddle Mountain Road •Bozeman,Montana 59715 Phone:406.586-6909• barbara_vaughn@hotmaii.com Attn: Jean Ramer US Army Corps of Engineers Helena Regulatory Office 301 South Park,Drawer 10014 Helena,Montana 59626-0014 Re: Corps File No. 1998-90-014 August 17,2001 Dear Jean: The enclosed submittal was compiled in response to your July 19 letter requesting • additional information on changes to the Valley West development project located in Bozeman, Montana. Each mitigation site proposed for enhancement and/or creation is described on the following pages according to Cowardin wetland system, specifically lacustrine, riverine, and palustrine. I have included a black and white map that shows the jurisdictional wetland boundaries and identification number(i.e.W-4),the proposed mitigation area boundaries, and the proposed development boundaries. A second color map defines the mitigation areas by wetland system and areal extent and shows various land uses within the subdivision. A summary of the extent of impacted and post-mitigation wetlands was presented as Table 1 at our May 10 meeting. I have enclosed a copy of a revised table that reflects design changes made since our meeting. There is a proposal on the table to donate 8.5 acres of land to the City of Bozeman for a school. The area.lies directly south of the Bronken Park soccer fields. Two acres of the north half of W-2 (D) will be affected. There will still be fewer acres of impacted wetlands associated with the current layout. A reduction in the number of soccer fields and preservation of a majority of the north half of W-2 (D) will result in a 6.5-acre reduction in overall wetland impacts. Total wetland impacts have been reduced from 86.9 acres for the 1998 development proposal to 80.4 acres for the current development design. The extent of proposed onsite mitigation wetlands under the current plan totals 82.8 acres. Wetland mitigation acreage and park space comprise 3 1%of the entire development. I'have enclosed the original mitigation addendum submitted by Wetlands West on February 18, 1998, for reference. The addendum consists of cross-sections (Exhibits A through D) and a brief narrative describing each mitigation site. Mitigation plans have not been modified from the original submittal for a majority of the project. The primary design change involves • what was referenced in the original submittal as the Valley West Shallow, Spring-fed Waterfowl Ponds (Exhibit B). The ponds were to be constructed in an upland area west of Baxter Creek, which would have required extensive excavation. The small spring identified as NV 4 would have been the primary water source. The current project team questioned whether sufficient volumes • of water would be available to maintain optimum pond depths. A decision was made to instead preserve, enhance, and expand the wetland area east of Baxter Creek that includes a majority of the north half of W-2 (D). This area is proposed for enhancement/creation of a series of shallow wetlands and waterfowl ponds. Details are discussed under the palustrine wetland system. In reference to your question about acquiring an easement on the portion of Baxter Creek outside the property boundaries, the property owners have agreed to initiate a dialogue with the adjacent landowner. The landowner has no immediate plans to change the agricultural status of the land, which is currently used for grazing cattle. This segment of Baxter Creek is also included in the trail corridor proposed by the City of Bozeman, which may help the negotiation process. The trail is.discussed in the riverine section. If you require further detail on the proposed changes or have questions on the information submitted, please call my office at(406)586-6909. Thank you very much for your input. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, r U Barbara Vaughn Cc: Rick Barber Enclosures: Valley West 404 Permit Modification Revised Table 1 Map of Existing and Post-Mitigation Wetland Boundaries Map of Subdivision Land Uses • Valley West 404 Permit Modificatic, • August 17,2001 Valley West,LLC Page 1 VALLEY WEST 404 PERMIT MODIFICATION • Lacustrine System: Includes the 12-acre Valley West Lake and the 5-acre Community Park Lake. The design for the Valley West Lake has not changed significantly from the original permit(Exhibit A). The excavation will be used as a gravel source for roads until build out has occurred, approximately seven to ten years. At that time, the gravel pit will be allowed to fill with groundwater for final use as a public lake for fishing, bird watching, picnics, and other outdoor activities. A 600 permit will be obtained from the Department of Natural Resources (DNRC)prior to completion. The lake will be recontoured to maximize shoreline distance and variation. The slopes leading to the shoreline will be gently graded for safety, accessibility, and aesthetics. An emergent wetland zone vegetated by native carex species, juncus species, spikerush species, bulrushes, cordgrass species, and cattails will occupy the first contour below the water surface. This zone will extend from the shoreline to a depth of approximately two feet and encompass 25% of the lake surface area. The lake bottom will slope fairly steeply from the submerged wetland shelves to the next contour at six to eight feet to prevent the growth of aquatic plants. Terraces will be constructed at six to eight feet for placement of large rocks and woody debris to provide cover for fish. Between 33%and 55%of the lake surface area will be excavated to 12 to 15 feet to provide fish with adequate dissolved oxygen and livable habitat during temperature extremes. Pat Byorth, the Gallatin/Madison County Fisheries Biologist, agreed to stocking the lake with westslope cutthroat trout, a native species that is relatively easy to catch. A Fish Pond Permit will be obtained from the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP) prior • to stocking the lake. Approximately 2 to 3 acres (20%of the total surface area) at the edge of the shoreline will be comprised of soil saturated from the ground surface to one foot below ground surface (bgs). These wetland fringe areas will be vegetated with a combination of native carex species, bulrushes, spikerush species, reeds, and grasses transitioning to salix species and shrubs at the outer edge of the wetland fringe. The final selection of plant species, material types, and location will be based on post-construction water depths,cost,and availability. No changes from the original permit are proposed for the 5-acre Community Park Lake. Gravel from the excavation will be used for road construction in the southeast block of the development (Phase I of the present design), currently scheduled to begin in fall 2001. Groundwater will be augmented with surface water appropriated from the Maynard-Border Ditch. The 600 and 620 permits will be obtained from the DNRC prior to completion. The lake will be an off-stream reservoir constructed with inlet and outlet channels and inflow and outflow structures approved by the FWP. Based on input from Pat Byorth,the flow structures will allow the migration of brown and brook trout to and from the Maynard Border Ditch. The depth contours of the lake will be constructed in a similar fashion to the Valley West Lake as shown on Exhibit C. A 310 permit will be obtained from the Gallatin County Conservation District prior to the onset of construction. Riverine System: Includes the Baxter Ditch (5.32 acres), the Maynard-Border Ditch (6 acres),and Baxter Creek(5.6 acres). The Baxter Ditch was relocated in 1999 to a 75-foot corridor adjacent to Cottonwood Road. Water in the ditch currently flows year-round. In-place enhancement of the Maynard- Border Ditch was completed in 2000. The waterway is currently a perennial system located within a 100-foot corridor that will be protected from development. As part of the special Valley{Pest 404Permit rcation August 17,2001 Valley{Vest,LLC 6 • Page 2 conditions of the 1998 404 permit, vegetation monitoring was conducted on the Baxter Ditch in 1999 and 2000 and on the Maynard Border Ditch in 2000. Field monitoring for both systems was completed during the first week of August 2001. The report will be submitted in late August or i• early September. The original permit submittal proposed to replant the Baxter Creek corridor with willows, trees, and shrubs. The past owners also considered improving the fisheries by manipulating the stream channel. The current owners have decided.to benefit the overall project by enhancing the stream corridor to provide better habitat for fish and wildlife and to improve aesthetics for residents and public users. The Bozeman Area Parks, Open Space and Trails POST Master Plan (August 1992)has delineated a trail corridor along the east side of Baxter Creek that will extend from Durston to West Babcock. The trail system is an important component of the overall development design. Construction on Baxter Creek is scheduled for completion within the next three years. A 310 permit will be obtained prior to construction. Baxter Creek is in relatively poor condition as a result of previous land use practices. The stream channel is overly wide and lacks pool habitat. Several of the banks are eroding and need stabilization. Moderate regrading and revegetation will stabilize the stream banks and improve the floodplain and riparian area. The fisheries will be enhanced through development of pool and run habitat. The stream's small size will likely limit its use for fishing. A stream restoration/fisheries specialist will provide oversight on the enhancement design and construction. An unimpacted, stable reach of Baxter Creek will be used as a reference channel. Several representative pools, runs, and riffles of the reference channel will be surveyed to generate data on maximum, minimum, and average width/depth ratios to determine channel dimensions. Cross-sections will be generated for typical pool, run, and riffle segments. .The frequency of pool/riffle complexes will be based on the reference channel, hydrological • constraints of the system,and input from the FWP Fisheries Biologist, Pat Byorth. A variety of plant materials will be used to revegetate the riparian corridor. The lower- and mid-bank slopes of Baxter Creek will be planted with a combination of wetland sod mats from on-site sources, wetland plugs, and seeded herbaceous species. Carex species will be planted on the lower banks using sod mati and/or plugs. Baltic rush and creeping spikesedge can be planted from seed, if available. Some of the grasses planted on the streambanks may include mannagrass, meadow foxtail, slender wheatgrass, canby bluegrass, and strawberry clover. Willow cuttings at least 1 to 2 inches in diameter and 3 to 4 feet long will be planted higher up on the bank slope. The cuttings will be soaked for at least 3 to 4 days and then inserted to base flow groundwater depths with the use of a dibble bar. Willow species planted from cuttings may include yellow, sandbar (slender), and Booth. Plant community clusters using a variety of. containerized and ball and burlap materials will be planted on the top of bank. Species may include red-osier dogwood, alder, hawthonne, chokecherry, serviceberry, plum, and black cottonwood. Shrubs such as golden currant and Wood's rose will be planted in the transition zones between the riparian corridor.and uplands. Palustrine System: Includes existing wetland W-2 (D) (10.5 acres), created wetland east of Baxter Creek(2.5 acres),and existing spring W-4 (1 acre). Shallow water wetlands (moist soil impoundments) and waterfowl ponds (deeper water wetlands) will be created/enhanced in the topographically low areas east of Baxter Creek. The • location and excavation depths of shallow water wetlands and deeper water wetlands will be Valley West 404 Permit Modi cc August 17,2001 Valley West,LLC Page 3 based on existing topography and onsite groundwater monitoring data. The area directly east of Baxter Creek,(2.5 acres) will be excavated to an elevation that results in saturated to seasonally flooded soil conditions. Vegetation consisting primarily of upland woody shrubs and trees will be planted to provide a buffer between Baxter Creek and the 2.5-acre shallow wetland. The mitigation area encompassing the north half of W-2 (D) (10.5 acres) will be expanded to incorporate a series of shallow water wetlands and deeper water waterfowl ponds. The isolated spring(W-4)will be deepened and.widened to create a small, open water pond with a meandering outlet that flows to Baxter Creek. The spring presently flows north in a straightened ditch until it disappears in the middle of an upland pasture. The 2.5 acre and 10.5 acre wetlands will be separated by a vegetated upland trail corridor located on the unpaved road that runs north to south from Durston to West Babcock Road. This corridor is part of the Bozeman Trail Master Plan: Construction of the palustrine wetlands is scheduled for completion within three years. The primary goal in providing habitat for wetland dependent birds is to create an environment that promotes species diversity and abundance. The highest bird numbers and diversities are associated with a relatively even balance of open water interspersed with emergent vegetation. Several cover types are required for food, shelter, nesting, lodging, and predator protection. The design will incorporate a highly interspersed mosaic of relatively small areas (>100 ft2 but less than 1 acre)of different vegetation classes within the wetland complex. The bottom contours within the wetlands and the wetland/upland edge will be varied to provide additional diversity. The shallow water wetlands or moist soil impoundments will have water depths ranging from the ground surface to 1 foot deep. Non-persistent emergent plants such as mannagrass, millet, smartweed species, and spikerush species will be planted to provide large seed crops to attract migrating shorebirds and ducks such as teals,mallards,and pintails. Deeper water persistent emergent wetlands will be created for nesting waterfowl. Exhibit • B from the original permit shows a typical plan and cross section of a waterfowl pond. The ponds will have water depths ranging up to four feet to facilitate diversity and provide open water within the vegetation cover. Shallow (<2 feet) wetland shelves will encircle the pond perimeter for optimal vegetation growth and safety. Slopes above the shore line will be graded to 6:1 or greater: Selected vegetation will include tuberous bases preferred by herbivores and submergent plants that provide food directly or serve as substrates for invertebrates. Potential food sources include spikerush species, mannagrass, bulrush, carex species, smartweed species, arrowhead species, ladak alfalfa,and strawberry clover. Cover needs vary from species to species making it important to provide a variety of cover types. Cover/nesting habitat will be provided by a combination of spikerush, bulrush, carex, alder, dogwood, hawthome, chokecherry, basin wildrye,tall wheatgrass, alfalfa, and strawberry clover. Final plant species selection and location will be based on post-construction water depths, availability, and cost. Plant materials may include wetland sod mats from onsite sources, wetland plugs, containerized plants, and seed. Wetland sod removed during construction,.where necessary, will be salvaged and replanted on exposed soils. The shallow wetland and waterfowl pond complex will be located adjacent to the soccer fields and potential school site, providing an excellent opportunity for educating the public on wetland ecosystems. The complex will be designed to incorporate nature trails with interpretive signs, waterfowl viewing areas, boardwalks, and benches. Human traffic will be directed away from sensitive nesting sites. If possible,this area will be designated as off limits to dogs and cats. •DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTRICT _ '215 NORTH 17TH STREET OMAHA,NEBRASKA 68102-4978 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF September 27, 2001 US Army Corps of Engineers Helena Regulatory Office 301 South Park Avenue, Drawer 10014 Helena, Montana 59626-0014 Phone: (406) 441-1375 Fax: (406) 441-1380 _ RE: Corps File No. 1998-90-014 Ms.Barbara Vaughn Vaughn Environmental Services 8353 Saddle Mountain Road Bozeman, Montana 59715 Dear Ms. Vaughn: I have reviewed the information describing the proposed modifications to the Valley West project dated August 17, 2001. • Regarding the proposed impacts: 1. I will need information describing the impacts to aquatic areas resulting from construction of the pedestrian trail. In our phone conversation today, you indicated that there may be potential to locate the trail to avoid and minimize impacts to W-2(D). It is acknowledged that the reduction from six soccer fields to five will eliminate impacts to part of this wetland. In order to ensure the anticipated fill areas are accurately quantified, please let me know what the expected impact area will be resulting from the trail construction. 2. The modified layout shows four road crossings on Baxter Ditch and one on Maynard Border Ditch. Please provide information describing how the crossings will be constructed and how much surface area will be affected. The original pemut accounted for the impacts relating to the relocation of Baxter Ditch and two road crossings, but did not quantify the impacts to the Maynard Border Ditch resulting from the Cascade Road crossing. I anticipate minimal fill areas at these locations, however, . they need to be accounted for in the modified permit. Regarding the mitigation plan: 1. Based on Table 1, the original replacement ratio (acres created:acres impacted) was .6:1. The modified mitigation proposal is consistent with this ratio. Acres created/Acres impacted=ratio Original Permit 52.11 86.9 = .6 Modified Permit 47.92 / 80.4 = .6 • As we discussed today, I intend to modify the permit when I have details on the road crossings and the trail. If the total new impacts exceed .1 acre, additional mitigation will be required. The expiration date will likely be extended to allow full buildout, but will not exceed 7 years after the modification is finalized. Please contact me if any of the above needs clarification. Sincerely, dun ,/J an Ramer 1 r0 ect Manager Helena Regulatory Office CF: Rick Barber Valley West, LLC 3599 Sourdough Road Bozeman, Montana 59715 • • - ---- _ _- -- -------------._._......- --�.._.-- - --- - -- - --- --- - - - - - - - ----. - - -- - - -- -- ---... __._._.-- -- - ---- ----- - --- -- ... - -_._.._ .__._.. -- --- - - -_._.- . .---- Durston Road 1' • PRIVATE OW ERSHIP 1 o 4 W-1 W-2(C) HERITAGE CHRISTIAN � ( 'SCHOOL , I W-2(D) 3.75 Acr 5 Ac s r l - W-4 Toole Street 10.5 Acres 4 Acre i I Acr 12 Acres I i W-3 1 W-2(E) ll 1.75 Tres res Cascade Street: W-2(D) W-1 -2(A) 5 cre W-3 W 2(B) JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS - 2 Acres w c mix West Babcock °o oats Street of Ya QQmo r W V �O g I 7 O O U 3 o • W CO L� O MITIGATED WETLANDS r 4 LACUSTRINE ® ' WETLANDS VALLEY WEST WETLANDENHANCEMENT PLAN ( 1" = PLAN 00 PALUSTRINE VALLEY WEST PUD VWP RIVERINE 6ozemen,MT P_R U G H November VE NON 2001 Do- 7 UII U _ l • Wetlands Plan 20 Groundwater This section on is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Groundwater. Groundwater Depths vary throughout the site from 2 to 6 feet below the surface. This is verified by previous water and sewer utility construction in the Valley West area and a groundwater monitoring program. There also seems to be a direct correlation between groundwater depth and depth to. gravel. During the spring and irrigation months, groundwater appears to follow at the boundary between the underlying gravels and overburden of soils. Where the overburden is deeper, the groundwater is deeper. Groundwater depths across the Valley West Subdivision have been monitored since 1994. Monitoring records, by Morrison-Maierle, Inc., starting in 1997, are provided on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets included in this section. Monitoring well locations are illustrated on the Exhibit entitled "Valley West Subdivision Well Locations. Groundwater tends to be deeper on the eastern margin of the site near Ferguson Avenue and shallower in the central portion of the site between the Maynard- Border Stream-Ditch and Cottonwood Road and near Baxter Creek. There also . appears to be a south to north variation in depth. Along West Babcock Street groundwater was found to be 3 to 6 feet deep. Groundwater depths near Durston Road range from 1 to 5 feet. These depths are seasonal highs observed during the spring and irrigation season. . The depth to groundwater increases during the winter months. The information obtained during the monitoring program and construction activities corresponds to gravel and groundwater depths identified by soils information available through the NRCS. Limitations posed by groundwater are common throughout the Bozeman area. Simple engineering and construction practices can successfully mitigate these limitations without extreme or undo expense. Depths to groundwater have two general impacts on the planning for the project area. First, the depths provide an opportunity to enhance water features and wetlands as amenities. Secondly, the depths will limit the use of basements in the area. As a mitigation measure, where needed, a note can be placed on the final plat to advise future owners of the groundwater depths and limitations to the use of basements. 1 a Now Durston - _ - MW#1931 MW 1 3 MW//1934 � 777r7 I) r SOCCER FIELDS 4,. O + 7 LL MMW# 1 VJ 1909 1. N MW#1960 A 1f1900 1903 MW#402 O CO O O U U ) O ` 4Of O 0— 0 i - C >' 0-_ O O U i N L MW$13 FIGURE 1 M ONITORING-WELL LOCATION MAP FOR VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION ! gMORRISON '/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE NORTH # MAIERLE,[nc. ° 0 100 200 400 o uusm»aremmamn•+�(mq a.mn �fm9�++ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA CLIENT: GALLAT'N COUNTY.MONTANA Scale;1°-21 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/U/2UU1 FIELD WORK DATE:10/15/01 DRAVANG NAME: (This Drawing Has Been Reduced) DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:1'=200' k\33g4\002\AC4D\E,,„,a\EA sumiTALwom-waLsa.y CHECKED BYPF pp03�.3384,002 SHEET OF ' r - i IMORMSON MAIERLE INC. Valley West Well Readings �'-•.3 �•X..;..E �- t+• .,Y`.,+-�C72'- _ r' r...asa. �1°_`r�i�r.> - na:,.,�• n• ., (o _. >�^`A.�:7_i=t` e'er .>� - _ ...,+c. , $' •...,r'' .'.' is - }- M4xs:�,�•.. �...' •_ �., :s' �Welklamber -.':�. ,.' ',a, ,�•t".�.= ,-r .,•.rc•.=�..-•-._+�;.. -5� r-:�• r. F•7<•_. ..+4 "rJw' v. :L72 `ia •a 3 •_ S^L `R �''..a .> _ .�5' 4`y+e'L.i!.,$-._ s�'. -•^''3 "aT"' -R`.^`c'3•..-,'Y'T�'�...^ .�_i: .•ca- ._ r� - _ - '-s ':sw'.:. a ??i87srir Sr;•+Y_f Y`�: � ; r>.-' -• "`i+" .iS.Gm . r 1902 .S..zsy... S>. �,,.,�.f� �� -t„_ tt '�re I �900 �:�;x+vq"��__.s�?.. -'' 903:r...-- -"e, .. . .'*r•1�09 s .y. r 910�-`.: �' �pc�y.w1912i"� - �. '�'t'r;^�,.911``=>w.��.,':,: e+.,a..�.--1919�`i�: .�I.. -y- `'Y:3'1925-"'£3:S_:".'p�, _ C.>7,{-.c. ._�..,..._Ca. ��rR.. +'(C .2� .G'�.�._.� 4CdiTi'�•�..._..-_. rr_=G"ri+ .:'-�... -' -Sj -{.2 _ ^�'Aq-F __ R^_ _Ye . o.•-w� az'v-�1 �1�`�c"Nh.T19''3• _''moo•'-�-`.'WN' z„�191f�x. c..'` - �„..s �4 +P •w•°aW;'a�xr••a. `S. ..,�!3Y-.:M. -«..,sr `u2`-•+',^•'a, E�•tT w< �t -•iy_.:•..es.. �2:,3'• .:ice_ .'f.':.M. - - �J°L '°�"- "�,-S« ,r•�. _ __ ..�+ e�s � -� lsit 1930 - - _ ...., sop d. tU- T dly<=_.::§` s.^�5 oc m ,'�3.8Lg,� rfr wdif c�4 '-Y'. •`T orweu�.. .•... .�.pdr la' _ qq lbw . .- :v ^.•• �..Y" .a tiT� E; R- '. �•-yta..+ 2 :k'..:`' •F,? i ,•.'TopdAdl gyI '< 5 k?' S .Y" W :ate'-5• -*'' tom rises -oP'.•3r^$:-. •n •a+.'•,,r , - s )rat yy :�: YCroOadrr±[er- .. Groondtratu ;r -.vc +Crouadrtater Crouadrrater, --- ,. rTW roaadwot GroOadmder - - - dlz �a` '' -•ate'.-= ..a„v ,x°0. .�:a+ .. _or _�,t.°6wa:v. ✓ .. �, , -.. x. -.,.,,•.•:� +�Cromd er(. ef: ,rTop ofWdl_7 .•r•. Cmmdwater. - Cat!e6 - Cadeg„ e c a C +3 ^°t C w . c4fi ws; � Levd:Rdallre ^.�_ �' C+d?B•.j,7< 0$it'•,. ...,FRB .�n6 3s,." "�-±sr, ^s+-•:..-- :--�C•.. R^�' ..s�.:.,a.;.»ro�- '�T.xdwuer:_Tay of Wdl;•�Croundn+l"erIlmmam .:Top of,�U rn� Level letlathe+, •+^w•>..,.�_-,I.e'vd Rdatfre .Level• a:zrr •'+�•..•�h Level Relatlre .-�t�' ad Aelafivi LevelRda�rr•.e' �Rehdre�Cerd'Rd4tlr Cad Itdative:.Levd Rdalh ,.�IIB d+�Y CaslOg, t.�:n3 S+w.-+s Y•.# .axr,�v. tw_;:..m�.�$ .c:•r.rr•R+•F Cad i C- `8• a o•:-.. ..Fv.r ,e 3�'7telathre ...r, rUr.• '¢' CYataB., a o8 a 2.evd•RelaLLv'e :,r-�, .,:.-. !F.__•-. ._,. _.. _ :p r.Rda(hcto + _-tea-+-r-,:-Nrlif�re�o 'a�r••wa .� RaHhe-ro'- +. it+„u3.�.. eto-;.�C+:7'•s:. �eto. s=�.••�:K•- rt +...tom•,:::s:.a:•.•r-,�:- y..,�r•,s.. >:a^,r•-,.-: � ""�` .:-�-herd Rdaatlre Caa(agRdW. Leve!• Call- RdaUve: dRdadve '.-=�n..•••nz. s�e�� '.�'-. _ =S-� .,.4 .>> to Topof,ReU_ Ly.-sr>:. -.to omd.„:r...•e +s`�o to,�.s�{-to Crona'd:� a. ,-ie',• [o.Croaad,a F :..+u ,to�rouad�"� :t..'-wc .to ._"to CroaaAsra! `4to _ .;s�to «...i„cr,-. -9Reiathe.to^ a .-•;_,c..• a- �•,: x.d.. .•�- :. r,0$'" G ood uue� �to GrovadS. :....�« tCdy s � ' "'*,an�- R Sara. ()'�� r �..... . . . ,fi�L-•v =t .a 3%� ^&_-+ ., maeeR). + ilevd �:Satee R,_ 3 _ (. _( ) 1} i :liytl(tl)sR �.3.69 '... .. - - ' a5zt ' •�:a',?£+TA97 -4.11 ` .. 1.44 -0.09 0.39 -0.89 .B:eBNo?;l!k"va'tlo`o ft= - ..>..- _•. �= ' �13:;ni�', ._..,°:au:sS+,.a-. :.s";.:'�.'",e -. ... �.•�;re!•tl(_n1�'-� �•` -}ves�..�r"' NR NR 4.90 4,40 1.69 -0.64 3.39 F-1.99 NR NR 2.30 -0.95 . . NR NR 5.28 4.78 2.17 -1.12 4.26 •2.66 NR NR 2.9J -I.SB 235 -1.00 2.07 -2.07 1902 0.72 <"r�r't•%SlS197 A. � - NR NR NR NR 1.98 -0.93 4.12 -2.52 NR NR 3.22 -1.87 2.57 •1.22 1.78 •1.78 1903 0.75 ""Sl2897 4.27 - NR NR 5.62 •5.12 2.40 435 4.00 _2.40 NR NR 3.46 -2.11 2.75 .1.40 2.16 •2.16 1908 0 :..} C•'--101779T -0.97 - NR NR 3.49 4.99 1.97 -0.92 2.36 -0.% NR NR 3.02 •1.67 3.34 .1.99 1.43 -1.43 1909 1.13 a'IOR/9T •4.05 - Q37 -0.37 3.33 •5.03 1.{7 -0.38 4.19 -259 2.43 .2.45 2.70 •1.J5 1.98 -0.63 1.22 -1.22 1910 1.20 _--'.tii''lllSD7 4.03 -. 0.26 -0.26 5.79 $.29 1.26 -0.21 4.18 -2.58 242 •2.42 2.6{ •1.29 L87 -0.52 123 •1.2J 1912 0.13 ,�s12fSi97 4.07 -- - .. 026 -0.26 5.82 •5.72 .1.25 -0.20 {.17 -2.37 2J7 -2.17 2.67 •1.32 1.78 -0.47 1.21 -1.21 1917 0 4-23 NR NR 6.11 .5.61 1.27 -0.22 4.43 •2.87 2.28 -2.28 1.47 -0.OB 1.39 -0.24 0.93 -0.93 1919 0.30 4-� - .,. NR NR 6.13 .5.63 1.27 -0.22 4.64 _3.04 2.45 -245 1.42 -0.07 1.59 -0.24 0.95 .0.95 1923 L8 �..�12f398 4.43 _ NR NR 6.14 •5.64 1.30 -0.25 4.65 -7.03 2.38 -238 2.41 -1.06 1.74 -0.39 0.78 -0.78 I925 LOS 'S 2lL19S 4.33 NR NR 6.00 •5.50 IJI -0.26 4JJ •2.9) 2.38 •2.38 2.63 •L70 L77 -0.42 0.72 -0.72 1970 1.6 ' ]fi0N6 -4.40 i "NR NR 6.07 •3.37 1.35 .0.30 4.61 -3.01 235 -2.75 2.58 =1.27 1.87 -0.52 0.74 -0.74 1971 "^-aS' YINB -2.46 •• ..NOT ESTABLISHED O.OI -0.OJ 5.47 -4.97 0.90 0.15 6.9J -3.73 2.11 -2.It 2J2 -0.97 1.45 -0.100.9I 1934 1.35 ;.t'.VS4798 -7.46 0.66 .0.66 5.85 •5.35 2.20 AAS 4.98 -3.38 2.31 •2.31 2.63 •I.26 1.94 -0.59 1.4I -1.42 1936 1.73 r 31788 4.82 •" 1.96 -L% 6.21 •3.71 3.08 -2.01 3.08 •3.48 3.02 -3.02 3.22 -1.87 257 -1.18 5.74 •5.34 1960 a ' 2.70 •2.70 6.44 •5.94 3.44 •2J9 {.76 -3.16 3J7 •3.37 3.49 -2.14 339 -2.04 5.74 •5.74 .. .. •. - 44 3 44 .2.39 '�'•^`.Fwb.i98 .3.97 4.18 3.16 3.59 3 39 4 09 2 74 3.72 2 37 6.50 2.72 2.72 6.90 .6. •6.50 ' 2.05 -2.03 6.76 6.25 3.23 -2.23 {.06 •246 3.11 -3.11 J.11 •:1.76 3.83 -2.48 6.51 -6.51 0,;UM019S -4.43 :, •. c_1Sh3/98 .. - �• 3.26 •7.26 6.69 6.19 4.62 -3J7 4.99 •7.79 5.01 -5.04 3.83 2.48 4.82 -7.47 6.34 -6.34 "* 299 -2.99 7.99 -7.49 4.41 -3.36 6.65 •5.05 3.45 •3.45 3.99 -2.64 3.90 -2.53 3.44 •7.44 2.62 .2.62 7.30 -6.80 3.76 431 6.91 -5.31 7.46 .3.46 4.27 •2.92 3.73 -2.38 5.24 •3.24 -v�F-`w�.9h698 212 .2.12 6.85 •6.75 3.50 -2.45 3.49 •7.89 3.06 _7.06 4.21 -2.86 3.68 -2.33 7.49 •7.49 '=3S'410lU98 1.52 •1.52 6.76 .5.86 285 -1.80 5.02 -0.42 283 •2.85 3.76 •241 3.41 -2.06 2.51 •2.51 --" fOhL9S • 0.99 -0.99 6.33 -5.85 2.27 •LI8 i.84 -3.24 264 •2.64 7.78 •2.47 3.19 -1.8{ 219 -2.19 0.74 .0.74 6.13 4.63 1.57 -0AS 1.61 -3.01 2.42 -2A2 7.61 •2.26 2.83 -1.48 0.72 -0.72 6.25 T75 1.69 -0.6{ 4.69 -3.29 � 3.51 -216 LIS -200 +-a?;^;::••Y" 0.54 .0.54 6.15 -5.65 1.22 -0.17 4.79 -0.19 3.27 -L92 - - `=a:'lll'L99 2.80 -2.08 2.24 -1.49 2.50 -1.35 1.94 .0.74 NR NR 0.00 0.00 5.32 •4.82 1.05 0.00 4.30 -2.70 29I =1.36 :-•i;^•`•" 5:'�ita'�27U99 NR NR 3.08 -2.33 3.07 "•1.92 2.83 .1.63 4.04 •3.89 0.79 .0.79 5.93 •5.43 1.05 0.00 4.92 -1.32 3.51 •2.16 - =:"'i211599 NR NR 7.2) •2R8 3.08 -1.93 2.92 .1.72 4.21 -4.06 NR NR 5.90 •5.40 1.05 0.10 4.88 •3.28 3.37 •202 f4'�"7*3/499 3.27 -2.53 2.61 -1.86 252 -1.37 2.02 -0.82 3.63 •7.48 NR NR 5.68 •5.18 1.05 0.00 4.04 _2.44 2.85 -1.50 _ �'•''4••'' a:.m3737/99 2.68 -1.96 2.21 •1.46 2.36 -1.21 1.53 -0.33 3.06 -2.91 NR NR 5.25 �4.75 LOS 0.00 ).67 -2.07 � 2.54 •I.19 � ; L'iv+'3/lIN9 2J2 •2.00 3.49 -274 278 -1.63 2.36 -1.16 4.03 .3.88 NR NR 5.88 -5.78 1.05 0.00 4.14 _254 3.03 -1.68 ' �T Vi'glly99 ,. 3.56 •2.94 2.78 -2.03 2.75 4a 2.33 -LU 3.78 -7.63 0.46 -0.46. 5.83 -5.33 1.05 0.00 4.20 -2.60 '. 1.08 •1.7) t r - 72Y31Sam 3.30 -2.58 2.54 -1.79 2.45 .'.1.30 2.02 -0.82 3.87 .3.72 0.00 0.00 5.78 •5.28 LOS 0.00 -7.89 -228 2.68 -IJ) t311799 ,W 3.74 -3.02 2.98 -2.23 2.95 •1.80 2.67 -1.43 4.18 -4.03 0.00 0.00 5.93 -5.43 1.43 -0.38 4.2S -2.63 NR OVALIJEI ^6Rf99 > 7.90 -3.18 3.07 •2J2 3.00 •L83 2.87 -1.67 4.54 .-4.39 0.55 .0.55 6.09 •5.59 1.67 -0.58 1.29 •2.69 2.96 d.61 ' T/1789 �" 4.92 4.20 3.13 •2.38 3.31 -2.16 3.08 -1.88 4.36 4.21 1.54 -1.54 6.03 -5.55 2.34 -1.29 4.42 •2.82 3.57 •2.22 3 �'6R099 3.90 •3.18 IV •2.12 3.15 '-2.00 J.14 •1.94 4.71 4.56 L35 -1.35 6.20 •5.70 2.4I -1.36 4.50 •2.90 ''C O.I I -2.76 � C 7h7799 .1 4.22 -7.30 3.24 -249 3.8J -268 3.78 -2.58 - 4.90 4.75 1.96 -I.% 6.20 .5.70 3.10 •2.05 4.68 -0.08 i 4.75 •7.00 G O` 1*47 7127M 4.72 4.00 3.80 •3.05 4.10 -.2.95 4.06 •2.86 5.20 .5.05 2.40 -2.40 6.68 -6.I6 3.72 -2.67 5.22 •3.62 4.73 -0.40 C •' < 3.85 -3.17 3.09 •2.34 3.15 -2.00 L92 -1.72 SJ2 -3.17 1.33 -L7) 6.34 -5.84 2.44 •I.39 6.02 4.42 .' 4.38 •3.23 3.36 -2.86 4.25 .3.50 3.28 -2.13 3.10 -1.90 5.50 -5.35 1.26 •1.26 7.58 •7.08 2.71 -1.66 4.98 -7J8 s 4.58 10/27A9 4.16 -3.44 7.38 -2.67 J.2) 37 -2.12 3.13 •1.93 5.43 •3.28 LU -LI2 6.30 .6.00 2.61 -1.59 5.04 .3.44 m 4.±7 --2.92 U17199 3.63 -2.91 3.33 -238 3.10 -1.95 3.00 -1.80 5.25 .5.10 0.87 -0.87 6.25 .5.75 2.21 -1.16 4.46 -2.86 4.01 •2.66 4.17 -3.45 3.40 -2.65 322 •2.07 3.13 -1.93 5.21 •5.06 0.45 -0.SS 6.28 .5.76 2.34 -1.29 5.17 -0.57 3.42 -2.07 . }il/=glp0 4.44 -3.72 3.59 -284 3.25 •2.10 3.24 -2.04 5.54 •5.39 0.85 .0.35 6.32 •5.82 1.95 .0.90 5.23 -3.61 -">;J'iSh3N1 4.16 -3.44 3.5 -275 3.26 .2.11 3.64 •2.44 5.51 .5.36 241 •1.91 619 •5.69 2.37 -1.32 4.32 -2J2 3.37 $S2 4$.�}�6f5101 5JI 4.59 5.02 -4.27 3.69 .2.54 3.91 •2.71 5.94 .5.69 1.27 -0.77 6.26 •5.76 2.30 -1.25 1.10 -2.50 4.19 d.84 sIT.NFllll - 3.42 -2.70 272 -1.97 2.91 -1.76 2.77 .1.57 4.81 4.66 0.82 -0.32 5.85 -5.35 1.71 -0.66 3.31 -1.91 3.40 •2.03 . ."ii�1-.7/3701 4.59 .3.97 - 3.85 -3.10 3.6 .2.45 3.7 -2.50 5.66 -5.51 1.78 -1.28 5.93 •7.49 2.92 -L87 4.7I -7.11 415 '.•`S's�.7ft9101 4.71 -3.99 3.84 •7.09 3.73 •2.58 3.98 -278 5.86 .5.71 1.88 -I.39 6.19 •5.69 3.20 -2.15 5.05 -3.45 7.38 -2.17 •�".W'•.�I• 4.92 4.20 4.07 -3.28 4.1 -2.95 4.35 .3.15 6.04 .5.89 2.34 -1.84 6.42 •!.T 3.70 -2.65 5.33 -3.77 3.80 -2.15 2'c:Nl6iof 4.96 4.24 4.05 -330 4.2 '-3.05 4.48 .3.28 6.24 -6.09 2.53 -2.03 6.67 6.17 3.88 -2.83 5.45 •3.85 4.70 --3.35 ' :'t' 8l70lO1 4.83 4.11 3.9 .3.15 4.09 =2.94 4.38 -3.18 6.31 6.I6 .2.4J -1.97 6.8 6.J 3.85 -2.80 S.SS .3.98 4.79 .•3.44 1.48 -7.76 3.57 •2.62 3.72 -2.37 7.96 -2.76 6.28 -6.0 1.81 •t.31 69t 6.41 3.07 Q.O± SAS •1.55 4.79 .7_44 _ ;7.3°=9l28f01 4.6 •3.68 3.66 -2.91 3.8 -'-2.65 4.09 .2.89 6.15 -6.00 1.9 -I.40 6.97 6.43 3.21 •2.16 5.17 .3.57 4.82 •-7.47 '•s'''�6•`` ce 10/10'OI 4.62 -0.90 7.7 -2.95 3.81 '•2.66 4.05 -2.83 6.2 -6.03 1.94 -1.44 6.95 •6.4! 3.24 -2.19 S.IB •3.58 - 4.83 JSO ••°��•�'!,.;•• • Nous: ' Cuin9 C1n1tioo rCbtir.0 t0 tbC gr0006 stu6Ce=M'12ble. Groundwater Level Relative to Ground (ft) O O t1F O c n O to O to O vF O 1/14/99 rR �. Mail - r'�.2/15/99 y 2/4/99 + 1 fx s� � , ��? .i § �, tr.. �'J� au. tr .Z•S'£T�3F 4q'�r i nri .� l'! §v r'SR�tc '-1 'fix ""`. °(> '.Yr ♦ -3. �{ d' ♦-yV�' 7r.2` '`wj�»�JfP _I-6• >` y 3 ..� s s tt'tI `,�`k' ��t�• is � 3/4/99 �"-+;Ls. `•� i+s'�pa•�7r(y i r e,r ke 4k^� ' i'� :f t •�`.i%` t 3/17/99 , r ,t �`, f �t _ � � `�S„ j`"F�,'�'} ` "t`�f ,V�•,• �1 x.t„yEs,,� ,F '� ., r _ 0 j ; ,T ,04 � ,�a .i'i -Y 3/31/99 � �r h n r r-: F,• �.:` '�..""Se6.3 F I•�f`'`R2-'n I J.k''.A.�. t .'e+ 'f Wit' -rr' I .�', J ..-,,.''t7-� a? t'I.L,' ram. 4/13/99 ta � ? � " rr � }t �� Y•-� °54 °S r 4k�. u h * +-• ri Is `S �c y2Y "� '' �. '�l� `w� t�..v "'s'+'Y,t .. a3�.�51�" Tt ��J'tF •r f ';l.�+ ]' tx 5 Qit ''6� ^�L ' . r ,r dMS! { E�( 'J.ggl j;�y?'O(y+�C i� A.�.t � TTT"""aaa �`"4,Li�FY ?u3 y-/-��.U P��'�,?v 4" ., 1 -1�� L 1�LL i17 fie 5/17/99 � > ; '�"mix 'c"•H�L b fi`kSraF. �. 6/2/99 u £ �� 3 f r� � . } �''.+ 7. '. �,$ vi' ,� 1 1rr3.Or �"` 'sc Rite 4�Ir f '� rya K. jx v rI i a N3< '� ? X ..,,.- Nil u ,--rrr,,."K"�' ,. j 4a'•v., _I +._.s'L.S'c* ♦ �.+ S-3..:_..w.�v..-ram. ,Sj,>c f 6/17/99 � k a �Fr � ��,''��� � Y ��a� MOM y' a�'& �•e �3 g a a+ :3?�} 3� i��tsf t t Z e ttE, - } �Ltd ' 1;�` .� r :r „Y..+ 6/30/99 : C � 4'� F ti+ -,La}Yty,I •z� r✓ h c` YLIy�C{ O f {Miss-, fS-CA `F am"', jy�k�' � `r'y� r�,s Kf n L Fi�� �, �7/12/99 � �� �n aj}y" ZY 3;-'�' C 'Xi '&'z3X.{�+ '��f i" r a k S "" ( ��'^yy } ;{sue,. FF`,'F'fw �, C" ,,fyi'iit4f. � 4P y...•`t°•+��^K+' t�j� .:ts`"'+�{�. ' �'�•'�,.€'Lis3''I '�-. ➢ '4 ",.�;' O ��, 7/27/99xt ter✓ ��� OR,r .F..-'Y7 4-y t d �y, 'J 1: i• r� .k.,�y fy r 't^�e�: „3S I$' �dar ,. lSg NVINr5j S 3rC e� j jay ti` •;�� '�"7'Y 4f � l✓ - r? t{" , g 10/6/99 43rcc T•+ +73� f x f ^t_ I*'4'S `-'r�. S 1�'r 10/22/99 x. as > z ;M1� (fit j C 3S a yea a^8,r 14 'sA ha ? I Z w { a C`W Yr!s ill + F Y' I Ik a K r 5 t y �r S i s +.+`+R� °tY � A.. �� '�G ��a ,Qurf ir+7h'L'r5j .'Sa* 12/8/99 e { k�a! v� �xr s+ V 4 < ? icy # 3 . n 5 rrvs -nc. rr, i b'.F>:a1.x. w'.''i K`mr 'S- ` r F� af- X {[i x3a}fie �F �t h ?) t ~r 'i } Y v Y 3Yr i�.^ a''u✓ ,k, 1 r r ak-, e? .1/28/00 ` 4 ?' d t3F� s. off 1���, 1r axg •s r ',a %.r ii yt 2 y r, r-�'f'&"ar�?K-i:`e i it kI'1,iL+ � �u'_f. .�a` .: `4 y. R, "'r"+ei6u�avi 'C' �.3��:di'��`i 4+-}w'"S c•.j 5/23/01 s � ` r y ' F;MF < i_ � h �S Y .i• 19'i--.�rl >)i�Elm PSI '��*r"k33{ �. ea : � a+ -p 3 i'x#i� " r ;: ,}5(� tirt 6/21/01 �"� i '" O y-r��py�•rt� 7/5/01 ORO =nx FuJ Q t Tx aT C k r 3 f yn �. 1� r 351 r� �� �✓R JiStast i •;'�. j p R � - ' j},Z, Y' f� �'.'IydT ^ : 7/19/01 �e fN� `3Y e$i� J> ao St1y f�Y x �M� nt..'•a,{-+*''°'rr `Y.- Yr• py t`i''{'�.kd9n frf `�rat �$ 2 y �a ,F.r .. � ti u ,Lk 8/2/01 � , �;,4 F r, r � �, � t,�.�r �` rn eryt,kd_ ' $ F }a 1 r+ is :r F'�• 3.�t T.�'E'.[r n..w $ ri 'rr s� gY�`Jr e ✓ uy s"5 ,�i. t 8/16/01 � 7 i h�v4 n w k z�,t�.F: , .e roI Kssa is ,aa �,t ,.u, ,+,`�c 1 •r"'�y .at- ,�. rr ti. "11x T d'. `�;. 'S' nt's-.1.'"'.sr .r- 8/30/01 LAFj F Fy7Y�Y 'e's<+ 1; T ,,,S I ,4, d +'k�� 7 n'^N t 2i`�G'' -�Y '.ywrEti�a4 s�,, •i :., 'y, . w}' t� 9/14/01 �� r 4 sayb�, � r Ifr y , 3r 3 b-r akn "' �' t d. 7 >a y ; f �"+'j• f8',rtg ; � tiff F lA� t•Z•�+ � �M'i y,.• "i'rkMY td��� .s''s�. (n R F*T- .r, a 1 4,k. 3 r�.[eL.vh �� �i3• ?;` .. i r f: .� 9/28/O1 Jai t]"+ 4 1pidn ;���4rrs' r'Yn }z ter$,, .tr' r`i'� a !*tf .b �w, 37 '' a A 'S �` +r '"+xr x r`r Val Q 4'iSe 10/10/01 7" 't'�'t^„ tr�4, '�ti ks�'r �• ¢.•j,�t ^s r..�a Jt•,t-Fa'`ll t*T•�,i ray.+ J+{'r �i�i �..at r�y� t3fi ~• .�Jnt �..1e i. :a hF s JTS Yi µ..F Groundwater Level Relative to Ground (ft) cJr p to p cn p N p 1/14/9954 2/4/99 F M t � it H }o C }}find J �• ��TtK 7 syCR 3jt Wt+r rt T r .rk, � s,5'^�'•2s fi.- w..T�•f 3��h hr' �... y4 5r=*'>J 9'� y`"'k�'i`K{tray^.� trC'y' - Y ij� 6 1�14. '�'� ljr. l'{� �i �s t 4✓'� '✓;�L'c' 51 1•a ,uC !iA :1 M1r� 4`y.`d -3S�"»• Lfw e f >,� a s`, +V i r _ s, ' aZ' t 6 , z„�l+ tgi a 2/15/99, n�t ' c , `ass+ ' �] � § d �aat 7 r r is r �F'3c 3�rF S2`.�`i�}* 3.r2.j•' }•'S. } 1'a"1 4 W.r 3/4/99 atcc35 j� aWS �� +ta�s t" w{�� i bb y 'f a-_r >t 'Sa h� 7'} '�¢' .+., xe} ik af' 3/17/99 � ^Y �Vt y F� w K tYi '�LTr1t�'ein»y 't•*^"+!'�A i� 'Jj S.L a $ r ''� 15 Cls R1� �. f • h h x l Ste ' s3i'�t�' ry >� tuws'G'a 3/31/99 € h �' r �Px �, 'r, + a �" s Pw �z° y J>" �'r' {�Fy�Zk�'" $'� `d" 3 t�-.�G,+ s.4�, 'W''°" +`..",r ,�'f •a'.' r yt,a 4/13/09 ° � s � l$� r a.��nS�jt,"�""G��l � C;',>�, tl � '����+�r•C•G2 n - y,,. 5/2/99 � 4 �Ir42 NdL �e 7- 3J � , 4 R\ i r Y T' S Fif r� 'Wu^ 4 3 q3. Ll a ,ayJY'oh'{_�'1i114 4 �.. �0. �7' FR y'i Y.,-1 i ,4� EESS iP ORI j. '.t�� ; 1S, 2�'>a.. ''` L S`-: .A• `' {" r y� 9* iirr �`�•�i �� 5/17/99 � 5�1 by _ ME.:.s5r ,z � ' ` i +�r.' ' � speak st ,• ��1 6/2/99 wx k �it-Itt' i fia r t of s F g : 6/17/99J r�2 c °F ?k�1�f` 4xifi P r T f i !'Sk7 ro� 53 ~yr� t.f. '�+ >f .r•'•. .ir ✓r -?i > Y�rK •$,�. v"5'' r '.Y.' a ,C"!K r k 6/30/99 Nn .�, « z` i6 �ir WA � � �`�j�e ��r'�r SyY� Z* � 9 R � Y^. Zt`i Y^•/,4_�g /� Ili:ki' Cy/'.a• s5' �>y � ...+ �, .r� � '�w 7/12/99y�,•a •'aa ' "� ' 4 7/27/99 O . ' �ir• � r d t' R'�'J ,t'TT 1•ir`>� ,b„C is is 1 �?� S�x• `4 d = .9/1.4/99.,- +'w � y t Iffps '�{ w+4Y t' kT `Fr'�t1�U°'try �-e .ks•i,.:.+.- .>aC""-st' ,"`'' z-�h` - - -�� •..� • �p 10/6/99 }_ try ° . � i1 a{;'x '' 5 a4 r• r ! �` �.7' ^i. �q����',S' ��'Sr-�.�����i�'� �:.�ii ��y i'~�•�' i r�i���T� � - �1'.rfNf''��t �i�'vC r3". t S + §• 1 ,� 3�� ''�s`k`^F r, S.}k 8° �{.�,� ,,, - a5 e a M1� tr;,.ru, '9 10/22/99 . ` � nyxtp ,r�4;.n' 11/17/99 y ;.r,Y.v. ,3•{ � /`t �' 'k\` ''i 12/8/99 �- � r�.• ��F /''e, '�'r`"� nE�iF g P cdr oy- 4K•'�q ti, •,�'. ''� � x •� '� i� ������ t �j�,,S,4� 31.� d', `' fiw �c � m �xrS`�' �y'< r �s'f }i'"� + �yr.� `u r„t 1/28/00 , k:y �' '« 'i ' �, _ >� �sf •iS ^ 1 �1 r•91 �,5 C Y 7• tf iy+ems •(4��:�{_d Ji �' -r� �r7� r� fly�' J. }r.'� �'��;,� lF �'+'iP,,. rr->i�;Y l- y 'ri r y^aw %.,•, yi., ��t<, �it � t�� � w 5/23/01 ^M i✓ .t9�}£� �- kr-'TxL,�;�.fp;.�«y,3 } �t �,� a.3✓�`C"k' �a �. - �� 6/5/015 � Y ri vTl .�r'a1"sH,T� tO?'; r� t � ••�' �;� �J/.rp+V T -[L MUS i .L'r�.1 4 .tirtRa✓ ' i .ie.-1 f• fi�trt� �� Aya Y i'-�M Nam:.� aa��r, ��4�' �` }' ,SSb" a xW Ali' �,rk JtYS ?qF4. u 6/21/01 k f y Nd Y �° dtv�'t2Yr� yy n{$ �y�r i D7� 4 ti ot4— 6 a t r 47. 7,nc S; $ Spa r, t C WHO 1\�yi 4'"�-'x� .c. `d•r �-s-.�C- ',WINE, 7'7/5/01 dt"Mae- a '`ztC" F° 2y y' �n'� / ��*uk& � 3F�gsi a }. *1! >. 1., 'w}� •.a' .., � N v..��v � r �"y:173 iy?,�"'h-,rY� 7/19/01 M\ yam. Al ll. am ' 8/2/0 1 ,'1cr rr1 irr � $" � ■ '� '3;�J ?n'$,'7 '� Yd > v'k G - �vey'S'"^f `Y' �{ 1,V Mi' '' tic 1 �"t �c�f ^> r < y# 4`. s, ■1■ 8/16/01 �z f sir } T 3Hr I . 0 s f T r A °� Yea £C 1'tt A3y- i o f 1 �? -1�3y, truer •,k `. , �'Fi.,.�` ' St jr Q vy r a•h i� 5f� �=1 4 'rSTk}hp'` V/30/Ol .h3 K e4l• 9/14/01VN"`ra51 �y Tl Nr 4:^ {z 'S � . .' .t.cn tiS,+: i,r� der v r Nwa f. '!' $�;ti4 '"' th1,s�+•-f..�, t. .� " .r�''-'° - t'' i _ 0 9/28/O1 t � aK � sr • 10/10/01 'N,1 � jNEW J �� r w t y " _ T 0/0 I/0 T rb'�Sf'+0 3;,yr,+ '2b'.+ Y SY"s t c,,�t''3"' 4�'. 4 y .E-_ 'n -Ax'" „ C�+••{ 7k'f2 ;YC �rY °kS'{a,�,,:;w ��' -4F�i ' i T'j, xitid'L�.. ,t,. 'yr mat` ' '"' •6t, t'.P�', sr2m U i0/8Z/6. O(� r `r' ! ;=.e s •i' (' 7r. J t ,rho."'-i. 5 4� Xv F a,h ` t5 2wa Y s s {x✓ 3� a lr? x, 3 gyp, F 23t v . S.0 _ a>5 j 'N ,r 1, c1i. ` •tr A�f3Fr'1,, + L'T41,ri-gth - r 4+4'` ' s l '+' ' {., [ $w�+ �i Y 4 y im �i8i a � � v 1f5j'� {y ti h" w�i Yyr I0/Y I/6 .£T ,.tE + t < c1t '�, .ram..{c''+• .•.+,,:$'�3"S ,,-,--�t� ' l'✓+'V4� y+�.[7.5.� is N� a,xya,,�r x.k -'�i �sL�'L J�'i 4+.'ti f} xN' J' Y }�_.r. MOM Y y i k. �'� 1.?c�"`a �i, rm. [ i ->• {"+t"' K.: 'r��.�y Y` ".v.Y�'r �` k >" S i3` ^�:,riC7 +f-xW.7 6 A .i '�• , T 0/9 T/8 MIN �'•� =,nC� AY> __xs��,`�,n ` +'31 �i4Y4^' {{�'� tb..s� A^� r ` tt� yt a i Ia ;' � s T O/Z/8 ' �'' LY �='�°'-. C-7''t � a :�L,,cJ,r -�4^3t �•t }yy.�4'�-.:�14`� 'yA H4 s� k� rrt .10/6I/L 1+� P�- 'y � ? �V�`� 'r;ti' sK' �r!t f.� r .,, }1t�-p ,�,Sapa ,.y 'Y�f, a� 7 " y, v'.•` �i',r`'r, ` � TO/S/L (( �, �+-i r : sue ,E . id >T G e kt _.tY •:�.3i -h'��' :ne-i.?Vy ' '� .rRCP.r�•�" ..3`3.' . i ��`.•! E N "W'.x"LT '" `�` �17 X ^' . � . 'C.7' ^� MINIM ,1. :r.,wq"$)"i+ls�, E"ti 9% '�, . ,� 3y p„`L h. E-"17r- 'h y '�Si.J'F v�� ' T 0/I Z/9 NO M'�a M"EN ! � rF ,,. 'Gr � s $ � ' ; ; T 0/S/9 ' �� �'vz' '-w•�5�� rite lac +, iy,i`� '�' ,.' s� r- e � ; bra issy i u�atrl ¢ rsi A MY3 In, £ t� � 00/8Z/T ��rS �S4" �`,�#Y�-Ni"''�7i r"'b Et51-Sty -�,S��� �� -S' 4�4�'i �t �� a.Xrfi'te zl .y'y' r r.¢.. `4 �.>�.,��5 i"n°''b. 'LL. 1 ' u sd"r'!" m Yig:ti�� i'yy $ • � �' 66/8/Z I O• .rd } , Y 'r �rr u •y 7, @ SY T^`+y � ti 1 '�'^a w 5=3.-,3 S. ,-,. .�� t 1'�F Y Y¢�,x x ;��'•t.Y F "{`1r3� ,•'".' rJ' sJl ° it ci$"fn +,,t' d �' ,!t ''...t +(µ ' i . µftii 66/ZZ/0 T IN 66/9/01 iC1. �j+[d �y :l`��J}} 5.� J¢ .- } �apx�t,'.f�^'•'. yJ LF- E•'3_ d 411 5 T T.T`4s*+' 'S{�l }X ° +•V IN w t � 66/b1/6 A . tl������3qC a -� r (v� '�'u.•�'��1�ayg ���d t�`l 'C t�3.�.rt J-� ,•�. -°F xy�.t�'4�'. + "ta •ta• '4 3.uL';,s�'1•'syy .- k z a C }�xt > ... .. 4`«, r w '. g✓h 7''}1 7+ #J•j�fh h.;r �S'' i--t / .•�y zt ' t fi r x .:s ..,� `, �st�N •sC�t `: 66/L ZI L ,1^ ..� 7'. s.W�3 � .}..1 c s Y �ra✓�4 x� ••etsY� 'Er'ti' ''a`.$ r; r x �� xx � :�I 66/Z T/L r`rNs�.�' t �r.:L) .iu � ,� 4 ��'" . - -�"'i4w'CM`' ` lr��FS�r'3' `� r' Rxisa�„�y ,s t -�c .��`:v �`n" 4TM' %�j, 66/0£/9 t'k,d "ks S s''•� t ^ s t, '_ Fd �Y'I MI rae' a ft wlJ �ktd1 isms 66/Z/9 • P -Ai 7 + O��,'}• �,'�(i3 ��(.�,�.3^ �"L,,"�•`.rf' si7� PE -c F £ n�i'{ f� Sh 4+ Jib(' tiy1 'E" 4'` ' .s ; 661L119, rk"!p'� •^`k a.a..t -iq' `y +�? 'y 't"" `ifs' r' + ' S{IN�. .i� 'v1't�a•.R P-+ w-p MON.F -v1 � 66/Z/S ....k.'.4V. j.^ -�,,3,�� ,��t.s �a .r t. saw MI MR y SIMx a '� L 66/T£/£ ax= a a �f� 5vr' ,.ua•2 ;—N rv� r r � d ,� - +.•.x'l;p�'1�, ', *-A3la `� +}t3 rtb �`£'�;, : 'f fir'-. ` u O4�P 66/S T/Z 7Cti i�`�'' .�,Lam• ,,t.3�" �a���F'.�,y4,� h�"� y�'�S'�'�J�#S �''�.��!�,rt7�i�', rJ a-�s.'�¢��r E4�i:�ta...-.,J X ''f'4. 'l"lC •"i'7 T71 'T ""k ! Y i '44 a ffS'aY'h y., Z 4y�f �s�px w� JsFi Y" L d-''T� '' w - �i' .f;,+`i^ i r �tpyx t'�t cry _`� q•°"''zS�. x,6 66/Y/l+ � 15� rA'aarixJ'�> i. 7t1�'x� f,-*+ s ,�fi,�' ?���€.�wr,§�•`�'^ 7, ,�iuX`.•" t - ;� �� ;�ru r �"�r=.�'s?' C•.�-+`1'�I� ""' �� :u�,•'.0.{''��s....'n,s?`.t;�My�a- P*"fi f;���' '`'ir"'�'�iz�irt tad . 66311/1 •. O. tl� O! N O N O to O O +� N N M cM ( 3) Puno-i f) 04 anTjUjaH iana-I xalumpuno.i� Groundwater Level Relative to Ground41 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2/4/99 ,`yt,('tm " M' ur?, wlP 'T":ti^ t� G t•. 4�- 2/15/99 �Y � { •S j y "`` -:e+' ' •+b,.•b3S:, 2"•� -� .. r- ,,,�' ` ry.ss �' 't - }n ! 7r` }i•�F- ^'fin r . WA � ' ' ya.'RS r t'Tiuyi. i,�t�•m .�4. '' + ' 3/4/99 -Y OR 3/17/99 MUR 3/31/99 F �ts u�� s' •k - x�:'w'Y, }���.w'Fir r' .... � l[ r'�'t�'3 �"� , "t, d �k:lam'W+' . t=at'�ry��� ; tCFt� � �3�p ".lti°h "7x'� �'�'`�'fit� TG 5 � .a•� tnt ti"�;�'�`� ,tie 4/13/99 ate h" � ^ f 'SY 6� n -+•� ��2^- � �••2 >t� �' f K-�• J> 5/17/99 6/2/99mk 3 `` f i } MM �r .• f iy.Y 'N'i S J �.'.cam n•�..7ikc : . S�r t4. „],._ 4. t -' 3 ��"�' � '4 ra�� =i ,�• Egli. y 7/12/99gr v IBM � ✓, S 'ti 4 �.t.'��9y'- '�.'� .P'�' ��.�I"��'='h�� �F.B �t r� �' � L�' � ~E C Y-. 10/22/99 ,y 'T` 1/17/99as ;` n `° sr;� ' b ".3 �� t�"''e — 'N � y , �.r, ►—►. r'I I'J R�� �✓F.� at SJ < "'t;� '�• ^L. �Tyr di� � � c� �E3X j Y, tyt >sr �i,� �. �.� �/ - /A . 12/8/99 t - ►—► f•- ¢!..71. rya,• •-R.. ,xya'`l r e=1'. g. 5/23/01 ���� 7� �+}��""'S`�$• � :X +��.4 ,x ti Y ,��' ,�:fir �.tri ..•L 3?`. �y',�r Y�'e1�`�••( h � < 6/5/01 nn 7/19/01 jgme 8/2/0 1 1{s Jt1'•.i yx''i. , + .14r - nF.+ fr3+' r7 g •+xS�." WW miol .n 1X T •'`5. •'f p d+� .f7` { ��y,,s� JiCi'�9�c � yR • g PIN 8/30/01µ �� ;� ;RR 1 l � � Vr'g�As � ,V ,y, Y aE t�Yf,„�5 �• �r� 't t� 9/14/O1 z t'e� g � ' <7��� gg mag .�, ,f•Y �$��� �t t'"+'� �{ t�i+' �;T''.� ''t<i�� ''�'r, ��y'i `��G�"'Z..`-'k�...`.�.�'inn d. ` p 9/28/01 g fx $`r '�Yud S ' �, L �s tc�n�k3 � erg vkr r+ Y Istlt'S1,� S¢°d ''" h•it''� •,.r"5 ".7$f'l �c ' "x�y>� `i " ,,•,,`r�!`t)Cy, 10/10/0 rw ��� "' < { _: s ..._.n3 - ,• .;r .' .tom Groundwater Level Relative to Ground (ft) O O O • LA O lA O (A O c.n O In 10/7/97 3f+r t L ° rFt d%fi�4 C z c k �'Er �by`s�'eAr- � a�! s c 7�s,;J�'§ �� '"y a}r!. 33 p +�• r•r . Td plk u MOM 4mgg i �� � 2/23/9810m<n {, i, �l •L '�� R � x P&' R ' 3 x� fi ; .A� ' j5Z 4/7/98 , t s���`' �m- 3 2.. �}T S 1`��� •brf �' (Y f'lWy2 t tAT.Yr5,�7X C�lr. SF yr 7N ,,t``77iif` {,f.• _ae.5r W. 7 �'a�ss' •36 �, .�q„<y� _az.l.�:�F-'>"'�•`�y' t-11 �_ Q tSms.v tTipu. Yr.�yo J G•c• .r ro G(''r: 7/20/98 RAWSat%. 9/2/98 ffiF r Mom' mulf W. 10/1/98 � a ^; f �, � f Rc '$ �C . 4-�' s'` 'ib:'r'tb,,j of *' 'L "}il' `'Z Sp,�. �^- r .� �l`r�00,41 a� ayy kll 10/29/98 es ,s { MIN t� F..1Se1 i-- ��''i'�,r O 11/25/98 N �F! � fir:y' = r s �r � '` ►-�• Vs ba.'.-mia,,1, iN y ��i,t fi, �`+r-•za g`I�,eh 37•t �5•r zL1�?4�Va1-0 �c.'�a 3K. O arp i�� -,.I-"'3 wC�r„• Y •.sirs �x-�L�K-rry•''4'7�'}I,% t.y ',�,.,r�r+ 7'±s,S.� d Yr 3/4/99r CD A� • ��_ `' a; .'cfrq t tom` Y*�..f�1t ~� l y . 3/31/99 �,� t �, ,��a ,t �i R y lam.��te r r �y�S rw c �u 4stX 3! a.N y � 5/2/99 R�it`t �.tt rr r r ✓. f 'T7t,a rLd"`. ,A„(''i x a y. R,4 rc2.La .,afi sgg•c r 7'arTr'- . ��tti��� k '�,'�`.+ "� ��"3 `�' al+a 3"r �.r.;�f�ai'p,<r�- �' ��.tp r5,yry�" �}'• l V ' _ � Tr C c 2 *"•a� d r6i �•s4,��d 0. a�'� r"r ,sr `'�- Y f'� raM1• Y+u ,t+ i:{L ig"nr` 1 y j3}r�rr�' - 10/6/99 .mow= �. ��„�, �, ,�.�- � �;���.��,.�� � � , fw'r� ?yst•1T 4C �ya�''3a}•. }* G 4' 1 ".r` *E " Sti.+'� r `+'♦,(glt`. lnm 11/17/99 'TI �Si, ' 1/28/00 a. hrt°.�. tl•°v'!"` r�' INS � s r uxi i""Y�'.. $����;' Prey a �3f fw:,�• .3 .,ar -Jj>n `t "r' �•• ti �z• r s r ,rfrn'� y1` +i r: fa'4yr 1�S ,r,.., � ✓ ``� +; " -x.. }•,y,•R t i•ry /ar pT 1.F t .,, •nYBK r ! , May rt° S'.f t r .eF .S'f MIN 7/5/01 t'�§� 7i S�P�1L `rc� t�rCc ago, 1 r r ��t CtfSC s SK s� a�ts7 St`;r 's' f5•.ry� `g e � r Fb 1® y ' pe h r`�''Ta���J zee, c'�f ^�-,e�'S �,x: 'h"_' 3'i er ,;i•n�,;yV1aPi s.c ".. �k{ntn.•r '�r. +' yh• 8/2/U 1 rw x-� Y " r "t� �a �r s �' :ra O �t +;`j�r hb4 •+` ni<�q`�r ,tv"" Tir: 1-s {s iT'�ntY6" [ Jji the Z has s , 8/30/01 .a rF F�`fi �.�}'T,,f'. .•k'����: �r+yje�'f'`4�3 x,.tt .��{r'"^f'�`e'`)� �r ��5 �S' / '� aaia:r.' ry(n j. J"` 'qY'.. d �yk'. C'" dr' 1a-S? '�- .y tJe.. .'r�' +.A°Lq e 5,r4t ry+C�Y `^ty.+'.Y`�'1l•.t�` 9/28/01 ZlC. �t�;.�..u`J. 1r 'Y�rF. -'�i"'t .r^° f '� "'�"�.�i `. 'a•�1�kS. Z ..w...��[ •--�".:s-Yy„�.:,tir -rtS � �iy 2i'� s;,S:Y.r •� � �.��`.� r t���S-R �1`..... Groundwater Level Relative to Ground (ft) 80 �1 v7 w N �• p 6/23'/97 r� M. 'fr'tn . 1- ,F-" A t 'tF tv+ t9' "S.�$ �Mg jJ'�3'dx8/28/97 ;vmm ' 0 T Y Y MAN 10/7/97 ! 74 wa ��'v tlyyt; `� tat(- c" r�r 3 i at asi �r J�'3'���t:'�'��f� -� 1'�!,M'� ,yr<i e q T f ��nt� e �`,t.t• � t�A` r��.. 3 T�,'5.,�r�'v,� .r.s 12/5/97 IMK" firms r�ta y �•s d«} E- Lir rDti r�1/26/98Ye ro ;°rt'r5 fz :2/23/98 a yv is# A' 9 ''£ ���, 4/798 Mimmm � '� �' a,1 fit• +- t t�}-�}. `�3, '•• _a�•_'+,��•�Ht 't 5/7/98 a .. aAM- s� � 6/8/98 �ty � . • `r : �� t jp�cC r' URN �hr + rS`.a�� f'•Z �at"'2^,-' ;t( � #�{ i-7/20/9Q - k"''* a i ��� fit, •ia '"�""P \��'��i �F'�:i'`r� � �fi7}4 ���.,q� �C 1 V �+.� $ .+ R�:yg3c,, 7 K r. ''i��� .z—����rf ��`��`. '"L�P"sx L����'tc� •�t'i�'s�'� E}r'y�gt`.3. �`/ 9/2/98 fi `4u F �5$ tt`a F to 3xc t��` V k Py}� Y`"G. �'lr Li'•.�"'ir' 10/1/98 4�t) -� '�'rts r �1•�Y��T��7�u s�e��°F+aYT �� �F"�„�v �4.� ,�y�'y��„�'a.��!?��,, �':F�-'Si,}t� � �O"1' ;� Y �F.l� r) � �a ���. :T3' � 3j, t'w'F"�ASJ'. •�F t K �������"' F�4' 4r3�Ys l �`�i S Y 'ruc b t'^ 4�`,.�. E4�jr15 �y Gr'SP"� � i»., k. F�• r/� 10/29/98 � A7 L d W 11/25/98 ��YF �s ! tl r �� .� .. is* t�• y#S',c ,f"�, n #5:.:•+�• �;�,y �trc{ ...�� .y fi������vty.,,F a.•�4d a"`�.. t ir- �1.. ^�Y .. l �' �`�,'/pp' .a f !_.,+.O..FST•` rr{ ak4 �.,zrrh 'try; ��''(p> ,,, tr ;.n. ail MAN CD 2/4/99CD �¢.' t� , '. r. rY54' Y.J 1r Si ' ri`'8. ?vF - isK'} r •t7< ±'K fi .eb - �C ., # t 3 a MCi ' % r :e;.tKi q iP `r >• -1zr SY` >.n•._ t -'" lv s.•.'h F-'��.•.�. 3/4/99 L r'1s •�' c`�Q t q ,�? Y. i.` z ,,t t.t `•�, :Yr7�'" �/y, E'�ec• .-^N�,,$$y; �' r.a -'3 +'T' �f`j�'T`�,6 y S:7Y4 q}���t��".-T'k I �• Ax r.� `471F. '�•j'•S 3"5 r i, ! 5 }'§ r�" SdJ(x!�• 4Js`Fi�• �N s Z 'fit'-•l' "t• ,arS r 9 .w "C•d,.' MYI tt 3/31/99 t/1 5 t Ia$ '';;±±ttyggrr�" y�� .,�'�t�,�`�t+ ��,14� 7 c� i �a t�R6y�� a ..Xt�r ���Y��� 5/2/99 r F l ` * e � nt W 4 F g�• D xw X r � y% i " t i p �L! /�''+'W�a•� � �y,s" '�" �y�"F4��ryr1 r£-'.F���� t 1514-• °-�iy�! '" _ �l V 6/2/99 k 7 '�tqj }4 "`�a*al .Yµ d .• E r q� ! dix--1 �C%TT S� �• �. ��. ��F��$._L'�a�'�II�•'S .. ;�' r r •a' r qqr YF` C'�3 >T , 1 3" 5•at a a c ..1�' '.tl 4 7 M1 ( si yy ii,zz¢��,,r,,Y✓ . ui 3� �'li .Z Y „'�•tf �9� '$'�O ,,� �"¢t ) ���-�j,•� ,jl LF�t ,}1 ��� '•`��?�c',yi i"�"� �fOEM ���. _ .. 51. 10/6/99 x`•"'' t � ac , '. j4v � t y{ +!r,'•c , �-,zs " '. � a�.' r `Y �i .,� �kx�•6, 1. t , a rhd cAn - N. "-�l •9 t F f 11/17/99 '' j �Y�, �, �►--r� 'gvr� t f ;k �'�- Sf�r.5�}yy 'f d it"-yl •k'F z -s* r iF'�-',r�,. fr �ii, d' „ e'! }:•s N't r - 4'¢�yf„" 1 .'?' 1/28/00 _�� JL"j� �y������ Z� �1#�«F 6 �3 Y.1 Y3�y i�'���3 j>,t�,,.,�✓,(}?�y, �TS �Y.•Y- .i� 4 t G s Yg"w, % r'� Ef f �:xfF �f '�rvv` S 4 R �•y�1. ,4' �'1 'S31zi 6/5/01 yfmCM57 t�7 32 a sx ti1 ? L a 4i�t Y3 Ko .,. ` x 4 fir'" f yz�'3•{�tr �3 'A S:�-47 { ` l ;c3' Ur •�,' tMom bf F yw%t<. �f�f xs f � �a _ 7/5/01 s 'fy +'�' r(k 4.�, jn1. jIRI'ur�,�(r [2 1` &t .�-tj3• r �O5. . 1'r�� 4•*iy b 'P'r� F3,�Yo ` 1F .dS#7P '? -f*Y -tT t - .t �'F � ��7T- r C ��s s r1y'•.�g''4f tr i!- <� .•[ 5i Pb its Zia y j -{ Tyr ��- ✓ �3 C yv r tr4 F� I.8/2/01 +4, s 7 �4y f 4y,K'l f'• \'Y Q i; rim +� +} y t i t aF � SY'7 +r.. } £° x >, r } 'rR> • '.Sr+- 6ty .y; � p'�yzf�rZ a1,'����'F d ? � •`}. 4 S`� t a �• t ti.c 8/30/01Q �'` i .y�.�u 7 � E��•*({y d $-& s'% i}r� f� `�,. � � n•�e- 1.zk. , r�� "f�ds`1- l i a� ) PL'.� W v�, � {FC t•'�'.�,z•'s `S 'i{ Al, r 'r.�.�� 'y ��b fit ","-'7 r �Uj yeah r { rc �� � ' '� ������ s 7, �ak ��t~ •(K_X•� suus • t r`+tl•!E^7At' J •tom. O �if __^^tt � �7`�2 r •'^�"'�"r���u '�"[��.7 s Y7+Sr�3. � i�ayYy�1* 3 ��i J Hv' 9/28/01 r• "'�1Yy�''�`Rf^ t J. �.�.y„''`` 3 '5"Jr�'�S ``i•3�n r �'� �~ rss. - •n..a�_5tr.�-•t- -',1•at.-,:uN .F 3':.. Y-<.:MAt�' ti.:'cP. ':a,ii Y:,.t..., is�4 3��+aa,..a`u .• +"w < a •�, - .,y,t _ t ..b s h ty+3t ft,;: : z •:. ,, i 0/0 I/0 i 1 • 'w y`*..'ji.¢ �e.r'-'», +, L G'�rY 'S• ' �9 _ C O k f ` En OA71/6. �"'• r + i,,, �; 3` + n J•-x•..i-" k J :F% ,lam ,zs ' , «M i0/9i/8 10 512, e"v-'fir x '� �ftx _L�vts�• r t �•' offiAl Mi rwfr' � °�• +� ,r. x 10/£Z/S a� r. 1 �q •r r F+. .Pt r.^Ye A+s'rc +>:'t3� m, > r r a t•- x �.t1c �1 r"t{ � Sk �•� o*,,M 'y S�+.�+FTC��`S'Ky.{`£ A$��w' i.�'K��'hS•x S�`�iv,�•'t�cF! �•._ ,p ,.'� �y� . Nq RjIAI ;� � N��k+�t^�.� '�' ..+# ri �'�ter�.�`• ��•� ! �a� , AIR r +`F �' `-¢, � ;' k �}''^p7' 66/Z i/L nW Cam;"t` -IL g � tall N� � 66/£I/ k�a1a' x .S{'�7 •'"taSyS'^ '�N t ' y?. n" k ✓r �'d�1 t ty a' 17 �./ r s r•1 i$ '`r r' r ,., s 'ME ��•�,+5'"4 'c t y4 'u £� 'No661L IN y 66/9 i/Z W -1 ems'�,,Pn �¢� �,L�S`�•o-. 3 t y . � Q� a[r�,.�a-+�' 't }cfji +,`N' r' J.' r + 7r�. `L" 7 f s';ja1 .•' r �u�,7J,Y,tjr +'"" yt., -'i S! F+�+"a,•� �-7d F.:1- �S �i g7' t 86/11/11 Mol Mau �\J1' w"''�"B•r s To 5e Y �"e.? F i? " i -rt 4�{ Z. lie new > F-14 tS; w �7( s7�yt' .t,�r t,„,,'�e 5 �'+1,•;i�t0{. M�,rd y7ri A' won rjrYl'tt `4' r F11 ny�• acff i ! }s MI OF 0 6/O 1./S 4* Mat- ®R HMO Zan SOM �„ff Ix 9 S - r� RE k 86/5/1, 'L G..0 L6/9/I i �� E y g, �h �s � , axe r L6/91/6 !ti i"RY' ' d ! P.n`*1'' '3k+ 'v�C _4 4 .RR. t F.2 •t „t `'[v r' 3 +^ - �'r ,�"m�a r�3W'"c*'"E�"�r5�'�'�Yn''3''�'` �""t�..�R*�;6.:i�,•�F�'.4�i;�r.:.�.1:d'c�''.`v�'�c�'. a'• . 'hL L6/£Z/9 • !n O to O v, O to o kn O , -O O O r+ fV (V M M ()3) puno if) 01 ani)913g Tana-.iajentpuno jf) r Groundwater Level Relative to Ground (ft) C+N t71 W [J O I A O O O O O O 6/23/97 _t Ci��S'i✓c„ 'C3Tf7- �+�i`ft������� 'C���x��} 4 ��Y 'csy J� 4 taiA7tZt'7 •x� � " . 8/5/97 01 .IN 9 11/5/97 � a ItYi,'-St'SF � `�1 x >'4 �etrf •Yr ti Yyy �, r�6 •�' 2/5/98M 4t 1R ' Jk'CA' 2 gLj�.`.¢ , r 1TjA L A� ORR L'r a: ✓ Y „4 .� !' ? 3/10/98 t r fz3 A 4/24/98 5/20/98 �.' �` q �r"AMgqg My`AI 6/29/98 xa iy. r> � A�• � h Y CD 7 IN FM ON a- 8/13/98 �' r Y � „� 11, t 1 r �•'� 9/16/98S . tl r r z2ty ; ate}xt ." �Jye�'3S Nc' k CD 10/14/98 t y + 4 7 !d 4ri r 11/11/98 t 1/14/99 r rah rh 9 Fn r 15 till CD rt y¢w CD 3/17/99 " 4 ii TMr '�3 ' x *NOI Y Y t p� � � a�" �SLy� F..yams kY4 4/13/99 �} gyp s� w s ' 5/17/99 XS�' 3 ' a... " � i� y`' F "fA' "Yv,• A, 3 I ~ 6/17i99 ki '� .�:; p,•'71�� O.•. � 'iirq�iF 's • 15`,.�s•� ,�.•n!'�£_ o' a,• - Ptii � - 7/12/999/14/99 a� F t f t pan 10/22/99 ? „F _ �a?F r r �ti tfr yy • xm 12/8/99tMO s� ice' i �'•t��� 'S r� `�� r � 5/23/01 � $ ? ify a.5t ; }r. -ifl '} �{•�r +rh },yY MM 6/21/01 r,}$,` .� a rt� � .t "b` .- ;'Y .M' `Yf-d x + AJ�ti�LC -:t' - `�, , it to 9/14/Ol �• �4.� ��`' �'. � �`r°' j: - � ��n��-�"�� NIT : 4{'�'r! ar6'' yY•yE'. y 41 jS iSt k' pT 'cif F4�,sykr++�¢`�'''� t,.,.d�d' >< ss•�x{. � -dt�y �kbrdu� �a^'TrGMi#,jtt4;:„'Y k �.��a;Ft. n Z 01 10/10/ t.x..sk�'he•s`ih•. "1+z•'t.(thl';d:...;rr.?.r...�"i`7* .at�4�,=F.ei�.h: 1rh7^.vded, ,'id,M)c-..i.`OJ,' f... � 1 86/6Z/OI z -r 4¢ 4 ,Lk a-re .q, dJ d;,,y 1. a,FC 'titf' i� fi a rx L ati �+X'fgy'a+rss�i}'�' ''F O W ,2^' °t•4" r. sRr q it-�+' �,� 3^"t1` l y✓Y{'`t 3'k;jam �.rJ > 'y Fir. i�iY1 ate.-t� -1,• ,ti'-7 $I'm 86/7T/OI OR 6 t acn S�rp c3' �S'�' y'' ""'4�tr N,t "� ' aysb} x�,7 �1li 'tC J' s "•^ts+'r'Rs` '•9�•`rt- ,max� �- . 4�a $ .��� �-k'°� 5} a ,r a.� n�,> ' t �' L ip � 9 a Y �y i cy r i � h�� k ++ � �t 5 it L s, �uRx4a met it t°_R � n na r^� ,rzF—��4- • 2 s-. a F ✓ +?` �t�y'nrL 86/91/6 �� N'�y • .fiis ��.�,�y,� d/� �.'i4.r-a'7. + P3(t 4-�l`�.'t7c ,� :F+J� -�y �. a 7j'Zt�a7�. 3r�t".,D ,� ���:5. r�'•ss� ^ ,iy• ,_^•,1.•,t.;?•``c i �' }t i�l� tom} +S�i' fl i• 4 I A T n �^r�- h -*Y �'J � b��=''t4��! ��,'»i•'f""; = 5k. M r>-F$yc �+A ipc ,m,Es *fi �N r �' �wx '°ry# a ui a fat xw 4 �' nsl� sue. 3 s 4 a.� g g vvn - J _� � ,, 86/6Z/9 tt.f44'Y �.. ' i,, ...N 'b�`a'4t}£ 1. 7p`j � RE gg 86/8/9 3 d A. • RIMER111 ^-�g fMi v 38 ''S'•'"'J' y h•.`3' ��q `j�frch"}Y�Y; . �i aF_ � r ✓, { -fr � i~ x xrtAt kS86/, q,�? 7L£++�fS '. ,}''(+L S Y Z/V ;� it z7•_ " 4-4 861LIt, QtiF t g�.i 'X'1ai `FX x y "r .k/• 'S" ""` ;x (`? Y..;. r$ ,� „v}h �,r�t�tf� � WF(rt SFr* -�'{i�� ��••�'� 's qy 'fa Q , INAFS 86/0I/£ ' .t�, 111, �• }},� .5i� S`a HM t f u a c3 We,tu i u "galK. �( �yLyrv-�. � ,-X RON Riffil fm X . PE y�� ' S.:. a-fJsrgi)ta,� 1 * ' s�$^ '25+i•� +fir , TFrL 7`�` •' ,,�r"q •�. ' 86/9Z/i h`% ,.y�r,}=SrQ r h� ♦ar#{ v.7 1+rC ''° '_.T ,a's =>fix'•? ��i•�����ir 011 MillkER" mgm Sl r' 74,r � � . .?'tt�3 zK.��S. d.` n5:7i�'r�ti.:� ��'k�` .} :'�'.b�ch=.��ru<^�..�X.��..,P n.X•��.,e9�i,St •�1l''d��ya`r L6/L/0 I. o O o . o 0 0 0 (i3) panoif) 01 ani;9I3g Jana-.i.ajvmpano iq 1 Valley West.Water.Lever Data Monitor Well # 1934 0.5 qac �?L°rY`;1111 ' r n' nJ }.5��p�zr �''i :s rK�}}S,, t. -e '•:��,-S, �f�r'iA�'' @v`x .r�'��', U 1. " •},T:u:o3 ,�, 3�'t�„ ,.a Cet- i� �.�^i�,t .}rt' 7! •�y,. �' , -9•..".yya� - .�;,C•J""'- ? .�`''e ,y.,_`.ear '��ap�.,n,a i+�: �sa`✓.,'3.. x; „ �k •' .� ir.,> ,t�u,c'�r `a x._: .j.' �i�f `'a7r,:t•'� �.sP' '1 -r.*c ,>xi:` '`'�ylr:,. w1t_ry ;'.;k'r `s�',i,$Ft,Lw..k?&��'� '�'F:t` 0�4 0.0 pun, Ma cfl jS ��ta, . _ u$'Iw. *vi^'A`.+.�k },»,���,'t,;aS.4s:'.,:....ii,'w'':'1i ,'"'•Ti'�5 a t'a3C'U¢!'3Evt-c'a..rt.�:}. r'.r�ti.,rK.^ .�r��L�"•4T4..^ 47:ftt 0.5 'i6�;S'4 ; '1 �'.1az iFa'?i1 xyg di, '`S" t '?rkju. t, i }. r c+.; tdf0.'= r ;.ci ti :4":c:` Kv^ .� u^ -a• +� s. • �`�1'� ..�#n.`�U�.�.��'. :i1��32yc.s'�v q?�,�u,� h •i �i ,.n� ,:�.r.-S�ti�rv��"�. .`i• s_ 'S p s •P� ,`�'..� ,�,,. �-: . t �, r�.Yi .��. ra��'�'. qy}+�"'a'G��i i ��r{�'c� ;art �,/ ,F �T�yee,,ede r'tr��� ,� `s�'.K�i f: i. ��> .�, :'ayr��w `7 •�` 4, z+���f. '��`{���� •.- �F�t v'� zZ��. 4��:. ��''t:'R`�- -;� �.?�;�`�<, . • 0 _ _ �����Ya %' � .a.. .n6.��;t �P�rI�E��'��„�* �+'k T r�35� i��� K• pi� �,�'� a d +� � '� �v1r ems. `'� •��. �=" 4'"c�rad'. 7. �.�,�` "� a •;:`•t"S`ca7'., a'. :�' 7 k,� «.a lrr°� `l:t rb r. �.w t i � _�. r*�•� ��e'F� ��c � °� �� � �'`, -�`�i`�' �'.�}�s. .f "� ��.,Ise,; �+ ���.;Nift? f��(�i��'yor,� r � b5. ��s• .�1G�c-.. � 'o �@p5� f-'Ltt nr�, � ,ys�,d-��_�' 'vt:t T�_`� ,.�-'l�� .. - C12 '�i���...^ .;3 .L'")'ek4Na3'... w.�iY.4SR' •'.ts1•.:: \ C. u .. FM�.t• 9L ? .,( �Q� R r xu a c s j3' L s�rK. fire e ciz: g f�rY xTz r r v yaf� '•? 3 .•`,d'eR'4 . 4�t �{.5 f:r�:t'�F�k�y.�•LL�I�}��, ;'�:�4''.,jT t'�iTr ,,•� .1iPry iy�r Y R i�,yYef�:';':'• / �yg4�2?fin, kin '!: y .tTd,�t�-. a. i46b fi'„ S- t �t � kx' fat. � `/ .'. �`Yu yy .Y.F' � �.,. �' ��. .. ,p �1 � 'c.,+�+'y� •_3n T� a..x.'} �{y+ .�.1� � 2�:.f � tYl [rt�k .�,+�� �+u _ � -G♦� �w�.t ^..,,.i �F��. Via. ���Cr'.+��.?Y�R�..c..r`�_��. „��ti.Y�� �_.�'.��.i�.�� �.trt. �:.�)r- c",�"�,".� ".F���'ii�':�L* a�•�a�i�:?5��.'..Sc>�. t�C g��z.�`-q p"'�t.',.,��!c:1�3r,>r . � .0 J: .^">. �? �`.�x...r 5 •`trS'. '!f'k'Yt..°t,";:+.`:I:';^p F ".+f �,:•.:''f. t,?l e,-�r`'a. °-`a-!la°� i a�k LLB•' 'i' .Y�: '.,c+. . ••per.x. Yid, SF .i i i-�;;> '" :� X .� :r.. h 'q.;,�:A..h.A PRs ri 4f .ijr•J ;: R,w r x t#_.. ��6:�,r..�'r.°s. .d4�y '.'�2E�.y�.•`� 'c,..��{ i$�ii%�'�v�, `Y. V+fit � ��� t. � .,q ,} •�rl }� a .�• �,,. + .,. yt -t�da�:3.F t 4-` . ymt y� pa Q� F� '{t�'rst rT�:X. +✓ U, xfitv ' a" `� C � hjF4J '`` r..t -2.5 7 'y �$ .x�t' ?!,1 "k •7kt"'{`,.)i•(,. '£''"' .�(,�"�{+'tiP" �• t Y*v ( .E'k t. CQ ¢r s' ..}}� _ _�>.ry_t kJe JY:�e-v A"1. 7e�J ^V t ia" 1�' tbrU !i•,Fi.^ -'.'4X. �:iz`�� "C.Y `4v. _a_i..t4 ln, 4":�.,.�r.�.,� .`'•�ir.." i rt. fib•�i :!. � la ?rt-•�sA "r^?.'+•r, � �'?r�q-..tS".��3�:�rr.`aR��'+�,;Y,�z ,1S,s:f.L t�: -r y r..�':�.`.4 �..5 �y!..^ �.f.. L'sS�-f,S�1 t. ,► •• a YC . ay..,.•.,�w °r;. ;'C.Z � k`',y.'.z -i' .>r,?..' ,r �i'�".:r;�:y'}�' .A:::f1 '�i�i ��,,,1. ,i.�-.�".7w.r �7. � -'kv�Nl. f � �" �' �yj+�'1.� ''�. ,� ��, �kt•,x. r���. x� ^�`' �',�1 -.t+,�u1,t.�.Y •Y ,xy�.c +t - :9 rbV:r y '� ti '�•,$' r.�c �3.�.. � �sr!j L (Mb S� '4•h ¢ �y ����� '}fit- � �„n� f ###��,��_ � •'f� ,ra � yYyl� d ''22 k�° YJ1fX ? .�},.'i�.♦kn^ �� � f .�5.. ri '��.'��R 'h � ' ,4y' J .i A 1 `�-��h .1.._..• f �1, •° -J.0 +4 n, 3ek •5eh a s •. *w 7°.',.,;k. . 5104 - { •!}:�•r. �..a F •. `PXm? s � J° � �+� s !."t a n �.. c,,�.C3. M^' .,p'. i - :Lv 'yu, Z 4y. tr '.Zv t �tFj;F � .�•h a: •t SY �.. k t C .1 t.t,'i� S �} [ „,� .ri 4'iFBn.°•{c..,FQ'xe..._..».,..-1,;L.�?t"f+.4_...k °..,.. .,a '��d...f..�tvF.ir7 'S. a:9{Kry �'.,, ,a �'''-. j'sj "'•` -J.J 4�. -•;iT-•cfi�*I y:,r�• ,a.t°TM' .i�t.°r .- . c� v 1�9_ �M` + '3 1�j: p{.W 4 �. <4c. Yt.r i. � ? •'F.^" 1''dr.F..N-}`i. aC S`.,zx`i/� y�.. r �f' , F Kmc.~ r �'n�' .y s8 S> '"GS ,w "` �5 ,,.. r` r` r` r` 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 G1 6N rn 0� ON rn o\ rn ON a\ :--r rn rn rn rn o% oN rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn . rn rn rn rn rn rn o, o\ rn o 0 0 0 0 0 C> CD C> (D C) N \ .v\l o It o ON K1 �O V �. . vl 1�. M r` r` N �h cV W M — O\ \O ,T o � 00 .--a •-� CV N N .--� .--a .-r — .--t — °--� .--- .--, .--a .� .--, N -- N N °--a .--, .-,•t N �. Cq N - M kn �O W O\ o -- -, N M T In \ n 0\ o •--t kn \O r` 00 D\ Co Date N� MORRISON ■■ MAIERLE,INC. Groundwater Level Relative to Ground'(ft) :\� O cA O to O to O cn O 6/23/97 MBE ' .,[,�?5'3 w-,s.. ;tom. ¢;Fire. •t • 'Frn -h ,Now W�,7 �Yf�ry� � �a Y' Mg 7/9/97 �`x r `c l a�� z R�W �F `�Kai 4' �� �a NOW -�e��e+.7p^ .-a•n- f xi+r,^ 3 ''1Y d �; y� -i's�'. 8/5/97 ONE .4�9/28/97 r �c} a"" "''s^ .. �'•t a' '� P'' '2. ^4 .` 'f• `R- 7 S`^{ a4 ONE, t,3� NsS -11/5/97a � Y 'x x�r +fig AMR. �ba t r ONM.,4L 12/5/97 I`- tir 1T .� 4 W t� k r � M�.y 1/5/98 � ws � pit s ` of s" 1/26/98 go 2/5/98 � raw✓ ""' WM 2/23/98 5y r Od` Yr j �7 �`" fin;hg �" " < ' ' ;y,(_, gwa XyO /D r. 4/7/98 ti t € ;; g 4/24/98 ug : * � r r�[r,� hxr 5/7/98 �� [ �r lz iF ✓zY PY� S F.f:��>��i•a44 i. *%�J tY-' �t '� p �, � r4 f• Y t ,X.r'Fm`d'rs. .-r<' , v 3+L!'NMI r. k rr.4�r b n'r „�'.-a r. a- s i PENN 6/8/98 INNI �„� a „+& e'�'e t U p a y} �,�' -5sa a6/29/98 c Fe; qgw ej' � 1 � ��, ttg N,fr• 3 ,'y� dr mrti. ,Fy p IMR11 NO s,. 4 ''"k ti-''a•••��r3''�44J.. � syt. rX s-•� �.1,.,c,�- F s r�.-"t�'-t f• it Rs�f r'f�' � n ��� -�!Pc,�y� ��'x:- +�tr'?e�., -si ■ 9/16/98 �' r Yr T�: a �"� n�:'� S* •.xd�� �.¢'tL 5 r� Ow Nil- 10/1/98s a? sty yy R7 z 1 .}is.-A ^Y&,�f�� 3,�'�ri.�r..fir �'�^�.•���fi +�t�f� �+ �O 10/14/98 �4; � �,„ r��l,,��- x r� t�••rr•11 .�„' 1 t .'Y'a" t l-� P ,!, t S ,n,, yF1' 1v[xcs.i cn z Z 11/11/98y R.e�fd•1 S..... _ •Yy.. n . Valley West Water Level Data Monitor Well# 1960 0.0 �,• ��t +� ' q�r' ''�, r,�.;,' `s�F4'.'� �� ,q ; , a3 s"+ 75�' ''A���'" .r S f .�,'}:�-ss�<r _ `�" '�, •,'�,„- y�,-."�`�. - ' i •'S - tl P t i,� vv .,F-. r"TStii• k �''-' �'. "Y1< E �,. .y'.. ..tom r j,- '+r`4�(' .s+t r - r•� �".'�,Tiy ,��' +'�: 'i` !�_" 'L �� .5' '�. •"' -{!.+`4_ � t�,.'� r .1' Ci' 'k ', r^�'•i-� 4 "�._�„w,. t gP' .1.• Y.', nJy.^ >'? 1rMn,'�e._ xd`�,•.r �r t' +f... "' '.' .$x• e,",4� J:+2.fq?:t.. y1,t:. r4rTV K*` ar R, `� •.� �` q h -1.0 �f`.``T 'y"••f" fit. ..T.',;�rM..':'[``' tr' "_st: k5 e , Y S I�4'._h`%i"�F 1'i t �'7xYi4'i}'i7' .5" I �f: > r T -3.; 'K`".1..1N7�� S<T L •S• �J R"�,r„C, � ,�a {.. w h tta � r _ � ��� , .�.3�Ztl+< :rT- 3x.�..,��;,`.�s� Via'+ ry�y .�'�3�4'�,i� �d yea-'• � � ..� .h..z- ,#'r•`,, k��x��Y���N���4`4jt .� ���?� �� '��u?�� e i s�'fa� ������r���+�,> > S s +< -F,, .3��} .;4'�= I- .r ,,�.,,r L `".r'�'g#. �, I�. •s '� ,� •r�,,,,�,� ",'yrf,,zf$„� .�" •R.�i� raw�r�-.:Et ��N�• )(���� i(s���i .:�ti ,;,,;,r -"r ,�.r ;r�{�, ,e �.,,r'�-t r'"#. .,,x,.� al:� 4 !���N 'Y.4�� 'i�-2��� fa.�...r ;� O ;i s, r., ':�� s?� ;t'},• ram, � �; y:, { F�'>r.J -�s��-.7 ''f#�s..r�1..��'hf' .:.s �{j,'r�r-scs-�• �s�.�,':�.". 45,rt+7,.n. � �¢-T. � r��i~}�_ �-s: Q -2.0 ii M .!.:31 e u,-ti #�' =mow t ic�=l,Y3 R Ei�s' �'".,9 a!!'t _ ',v..z„ ii�" -; <?+ 'SSTy'" 3y}yp''�`,.,¢3, $ .•a•'�' ,•?t ',;a,'e"' 1 t $,' +> -'2'' J j`k } SF*� _�'"�` +'�T L. n n +i"r^Y �.s r- aN" :.t.hA <•yartCg F C ^_w� x y� u} '�L �S'j _F�r:; �y''<§�/f� `^•t`§�&f+yj 3 .���' ^f p�t _ �j �'S'�l.,�iw,� �'- 'y.. .E•�1 'T�zh; '`�`�St�i�7�� �',SY��L'f �'�,�y :J' �S' .�` ,SP.� ,y.tY}w:_ ^/ a� .r firs= •.�[ � �j +4.k d .+.� �;.,�' ''�+ ti..� ''�� .�i , ^ �J,�' =.'r��� 3� ��'�' �+..?�5�� t�{„ .� � � �r � etc .a: y -3 0 }�� jar H A; . es. ;" & �N 5^• Y4^�rira J `J f� 4� '. wal.• _, a �� O �' �u r�..,5 ,����Y .{f ��a .t'��� y�,,dt`s�.�v.`, .v .� -a�r2�i x��_, ,,..✓. '�'9 '�M � y' �.� £r` �y�"t; y .�� i?�t< t.lfa'',•�' .T.*i2 F�. '°`t9s.1`5�4.n�`s3. 4`irt� -r �"', : _ '�+� n. �' a,� 4 - r�s1-h, -4.0 CG V . �' �`C�,1,�'��yy�'+ R'P - '>i a'Td� }.�w...-1. .�.� ";���{' Fi� '`o�lsst�'�ip•1..:��. y�,.'k'-",':Y a-c. '�d".��:.`�`,,,�7�� ``�•'?7�: '��,nn,�c,,rr„ :�+:,•�i �+• ���,"£'��,Yi:y��-•sue"`' i > 'Ewjjf,.+ay1� GAF .th a,- t5� .f:.�; Fl .ray ?:«a[r. -.� > ;?d'•?R°a -�o.°'" `. ., VY O{�', �S+aur?..Lt.S.Tr.r4.r,�;•*c:l�r4-s5,i,��.3"'�`�'�•;Hi+y¢W�c..E` rCM':ti.•uc>f�"fAr.C'..•w":«'3r�;ac�.T1.�Y t�(4�tT f Y�',,rF-"'r*k'.¢`.�-'�^a}t*-P�,..'>C�,n;�t s•�tl�t1*.. l�aY.�sys m!'•'{.�rf.z'7far" �a'''�;ff EnF`�d+'�`, .:.ai"r�'-'-�t.4Svi"t L'��)'C"l�-i�'te�a:"_r��J{Rti�..tirJ.i '�"�f�.+�?�`��.:.sv rtt4'.'.r.�.. v-r 43h•�*..G:. .�M��1_'-^..+k�t,T3i.•_-`�`5.f��_;�.aI•^., $7•f. 'i`Ena rrc{{Q !E a,3-5.0 ........ SfLf� ' > � ,��'.?' c:�.>'d.� � ��� •d-. Q =r _ .t ,:°,�; * .�,• �' }x•4• r�+- win .ri` ,�, Y. •ar?' ;J;.�nL'4z ,.e r {?J'!!t .;T' Y„' Sr',? V 'r't7't����•��S, 4�s �}i:l���tttttt3�1 ��.� , �i� `�r�.;j�E� yry,� s�;- t��1 "{,P", " 'Ti.A- �,rr +. ��n!T'�a...�'{ tJr S?:: � �• r���'4,�����1-�"• '�J i\�.a"'_ iry tt�n.�':l�.-� '"j��,1.��I ;(+rOP^: r�1i�:ml SX`.Y� E� �C�{ eLdb{3.�'�,.;1.'.:ir�.�:{'Y,.,, T< 1. � 'i�'Y 6 'F�"S�sey ff��R,It] ,<.'{T.•:R�S�7e. v c''1��:":4y. _ i3- �t� l r"h� f's-J".'%'r9h ��r„r.l'�' �` :�,'�h::::r,''"...«k�J ,�..r r�,�'�i�- ..sr9�'�,.. +.±i., Y ..,�� , �3;'s:-y�•'o;�',. r.� = -Jl;.�atg"�r;;�S. y ,h�'��� rr4. :7:r;�i �• t .��tt r irk�:i..�r� .r�, .1�. r r r .c u rr•14- ,..;i t'q t � �. ¢�� r r �...� r '• T+_.r�rCCt..m,.J}dn.uy.,._ .tu 4N, t., ,�+ S L- '4?ae d y kN - 7' 7iAr e..> �Tti` :w>F •'a>Ej�- t i _,er't.a, a'.� '' ,,;, t.T i+,y;fi+;vva 6.0 '�'«r i�°�1wi.tf5±±r:t+. .F� "•�'rim.�s'. r .sk'tu'' %e«. 1'- t.?`J&__�rin.•,-.Fejra.+.�,i- �b �� ' �,,,�,,,K � °R`.�"-.re� 'l"' �'t �",' .� ,"el+vc,'a,��4` !z�•i�7i �J,`,�, �1s,�1C.��'ST".s'13i1�+9'.rf. . 'r ..i x ,�C«`• " ! tt k•r '� _ 5 • 4�g,4 S�j�17r,.*c��? y�Q��s.' .,❑}c`�r�t'a' k_t^,"i.:'i•-+S.`'r.'���',�x } i �.c,,'�,+�!.� •k'�++•s pY,'xrT-.(y�.�� '�,4 u��h �L �,.2-,,tir�+yy �.:7y��r�r. MIS,�ffig .4�A�.ia-= x�0�/,,i r u'ni",;_��f �'� i�'`+T�^•"�'�g '�K"`�',v""`7 1��lirec; ' r^ �`�c �'��0,"n�`§�. ;:c: �>'w.�.� c•�ki..'�"+... ,�ifiG':S•� , -/.0 -ffi- ,�1t�.-.+x_ f wC<�> 4"i+ "S' fi y?�� r,y; �Y'y •e t r- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O\ OS O\ O\ O\ ON OS ON O\ O1 O\ O\ O\ O\ all 01 CN O\ CN 01 01 O\ O\ 01 \ \ \ M Ot. N 00 SD I� to vt kn to V1 M O r- d• l\ O 00 O\ O M N i to N O\O N p N N \ N \ N \ N o\O �' --r -. .-- \. N N t 1 \V k 1 r 00 O Date =I MORRISON 000 MAIERLE,tic. r,q L's,27a.t 7 z�! .L3; •°` , s ,r rr`� '"a -T 0/0•T/0 T y ���? v+ L e s i t Cr � tY\ c f y Z i n t .A3 y '.,.. t�p�lt +.{ ,.1` t r. b i f ., ,et ''�' x'i7' n ftfl r'r .✓s cc...,zt o- y t r s.r' r ey'�tivG3- rrtrXr��' n." r s � f O s fr ., ,. � t ,��} ,7,y�y,.� ��3 � x;�Y � �` TO/8Z/6 w h SLa tR r' yc'r,�.L. 4' 'F vw„Y;w"i�. .vnR? a h i` i r{ �.fi''�' r@ ..:-r7yt �o-� _? +�y' K.'rj+t 3" 5'3a�-7'�i t' � f"F �Y' �r"••r r' r 3> ,f s J IO/tiT/6 W It r iF 1 Pvy YC r c k 7P �}��7 y r Ah x s ti .i, 1Sn RYI, '_ ''x' ' 'elr 'Lk,-Tr ,y "�r;+ N ..� rk 4t Ask Y ih '7`'S3{., wY�Y;, •• ! O i ✓v .'4' '1 ``� .J y; r. ,y•!a :.X " .fit : ,s "�`3 ti4+� s p '' •! .Srg .SXr S;t, a x.a s Rr,}1 S�7r. r'+'r y�sjt t,.,,}_ _{ a',� 'T 6 SA i 0/0£/O $ �+t"""S. r •P." .r •pl4�r` s 1 *�,i�'^cvl�° ; 4 .µ. xi Tn +S f +, ^'� Yr. zr• Y s..l.f"? �L lSllx'S-3,xty�•+f aM1 > ac '` kt. fc} Mi+,? ^ �•'• '{v°'P�6`i9. e +;�'r t -'air win ry rlk1 ••i ram. aI sl w "' '!a 4 �r --•'� try' s ��{ • ' R > r + sr' 7{ 4 x tr3 w 4 lolls '7 S I 0"K, +• iRSRI i0/(,/O� ®R Ua1 fye � Xji `3,y � +" +�C�R3 r,:ro C', F' tV t4¢ ^.. �F{ ale tl Kc' <`P' `'. 10/6 I/L milli NINE rf {'3 � r Nyt kJ ;a sY*'�. fib - ;;i '•T`'r"�a -lrr. �; ''� � � H �,� 1� � WK n 'pR'rtrti*"'L "{ zS, U au Mimi r 64 d d tii=Y t E ei�S � �BaX ;r s to 10/9/9 �! 4 4 F,x y c s' s r r ,tz's#r'. ,, �fa-'�y S {r S y�y i w � � r sa +�ef'��yW� 3�9 .7t'.� 'M q r ttr. 3 fic`'; `a "•rT } S"�.[ y' .SS Yt� l'• Ty.i Yir ,lit . .��' � �' I+y++�,tl;xr"g` f �v�3 •z„ J i,, i ' 'X MIR 4,14 P � y 4 "': �}5.z.. '} L a iPExO 'sod �.� •fix; X { t ;,A�^G 3 <' f i' �_ ` ' t�� �1S S _h 'ire¢.µ 'r P r `•tr `''"�� 'i�•`.= _•.` `a .two' ��'` li"rsv t�'. ....b i'a;'te' �_ 7 00/8Z/I 4 BJ N f esl�*,,s6$���r •�. t} �'cyi x ` v�3 j zr:S "§ ' t ' x�x " 9 ,Cf?k "5'm %�5' 4 �`' .:.4 l 4••�-x Ksa- y /�� ,.,i tt �.y t ,; <p 7' f r, 66/8/Z T �/\ ir`^'` t p' .t Y .I"e7{T� .� C. .�`' ��A .. t � '�{ "'. t h '. ,fit."YV.— r�cv �.�...ty;.,. ' r J '` yd 49» r �� , � r 66/Li/T I L e q T+ x[� 3 `� Nr/i •BC'S � � r��`��i�"RY r T rP' �'#_.xj�, 'Y�"C'f �� t�'^� t "�"Gs � . Q 6.6/ZZ/0 T j ,;•� 4 `v �{ H NNE yi Y "F tdG ! »t' i a•?s� f ^,,.. v> 7.£k..y�^r� )Pi¢'r t •c.' r s 'y' ' r. ' iRi R �r .�,r+" `G t rh .,a, fit, A' ?k' w''� r _ !teraz ` =sfk .:,a, �r. �' ;} �7 }, ' a� N+ '' S '�` 66/9/0 I :-•�, ''�`n�yy�il, sa '��Sr ,y! x�$a�,�yr�,j-. r .( "' cS S' '�s- .�r;T +st- 0.1 egI Y �'`� yq'{ h83��rRt a7y.a' t•a`f r ° t I�. x ; ." ' F &'E 7� ..�r >. x , ''.,•t aya• a"�e�+.;.°•".f•� - r •' '` '"�.5v i -1 •6 c` •.t�.5�5 �,d.� s Q,F �`�� 9 �� �1/ •J� w" �__Ti�, 7" r`� y '�'f 'C9"Eqs M L ': '" `. 66/LZI L'f .f 3 y[7'�� .'` d },s. 't .�Y 7 a �t 1, t P..7� #'�r J_ O �� + �1 yt{ rs'S '�Y 'r'R y y "�.,,ZJ°�{ � 5;HER _ ti 4�w ��r30k' '•"x eY^ ti>~d{3_ll `'4y"t '.'� %.?�FrrY 9 w4.�.°'-•.t•,,*oil \� - '�.- Tr i' - ✓ �� y FC�'r+� 4 y:+'^'S,"t3.n�r+ `"T sit '�><L<- ma`s 1. — Icy � �1'• ..,��eu+",. ..'ii �+Rk' 'r9 W ; .;, }� ant ' �_ 66/L I/9 ' x. v c e *•ma's tt- �'d,,}�Zh' �`�-z. t.a���+_�: w �� ,.r�•�' ,u.�� �y �i'},y�3,c�z .�� y a,' ;r3, a R�r k em-al r`•"`,.RU .66/LT/S` f4 RCi 1 c r��aCSY�H1 NONE -Shy �v 'k rum er'tAc ,''�,r�c �c cr '�., `•�"'•L Y L "a f �X •F� •L'., � �i ;� �h"o• „��� `'� yr.klolls EVE'�" .�`•`nY NOR MINI small k. ir�+�,si r�y f .. ia`'�'' +ss'y"•+ "B•.s -3` '�.i .�•"r � i is' 5� 66/I£/£ �j�-,--�`�•• ,`;�. *r� 7t���°+"i�' �G� 'aY' `�,a •.-G `Zi p, ".'€ >• r'1 3r �3'a `hf' c�'' Js+a¢F '�ri''�•Yrt'� ;?>y :�6�,m�,r�•'� ���,j � P fi �' .5: ' �7, r z m�"r�'�£s b$j tT��g e� f �.3.N pv,� i�� A^F����ti�yr)=� •�"�_ `-""��6� t 3" �-C.S��`i' t'1- .�+�9'at'.ji�.jF 66/✓/£ r-•rf r'S •�� ar. ,,..! r ss -�.,. .a-7Milli 7 v �4�3s�r,� ��:y ,�' t:x•,t 3F+'°A�i"��:;�, �;�+.� � s.. r�� . , ..1 -�� �t' or1,ysyt� y, ' :1 i.{r.. .r,tF'.L".'+ss' i._rA,.�. 6'�S r-,-.,.y'r.>`''i�.C1 t r7 lli L.<_�.74�4'..4�v x�;.;;:;a+'S.t.:'r�� `.LY $E±::-..s 66/Y i/T . O to O to O N O to O in O O O .-� N N M r r r r r ! r r r ! (13) Puno.i 01 anijVIa-d Ianaq xalumpunoif) Groundwater Level Relative to Top of Well Casing•(ft) rn <n A w N o 6/23/97 =4r^ .{{ xa ccv tf ��•�'__s �4J �+Y} A P atF. �$ t§ 4 ?=re�+ s r Yt yf i 1xi'b�Sf esa tt ,t'io- �sy� i� y Fjlz" aK r� '§tt Jft` y�.r t'sn ,+ t4 .'a., Y `: .;a. nra r!. ",� C'4il+r ��` �p+ �`'�y �-•,.r�' �J �f'"'�3yT c-� �R e�4�ki e , r .C+Y,,Y f _ L r s tii ajj s r4 t , `� s ii��r ' {l3 `` � , '�try tm- J7/9/97 �' FY ski " „ �i•. .u. `'s ]7 y$, .a .�'c t'S'q. MINN.. iy f°!* : . t'C'°xic-jr 41• Rl,, •-, c '"+ • �..� .�i3+�> •,ISO, t � � Y ``i � r.: Y. iCr q'3p e �.✓'r� s t�; a � r'3t•,��+ vY^S4� ��,, "�• ..r_.� �xr<•;ui�rt` s, �.d�Jf'�r ; 'r 7 Y Y"�YrIt^ ' wr s} "{ r'P' .f•Y Scst' a r ''� -µr'�3 a+ v s"+ Ir" ma h,.^,; 8/5/97 x � 7Y� ° : ry r �iX ' #.74, ��-va)74.- „~ •. J< t } ly J- `KID {,F !!•• > x �� .}' t4't,••� ro�M'i.{y$��""�#'' �..- `.iY-� ror yjW "��ti .,r n'��`e r k " gg'?:�X` `ac` f ip,S 8/28/97 P :; � h 3 � �;� ..'h rt sas 1 r '� r L a "' � iy•ayu �[.a-e`` },;: �fY��ygj� 5� rt� n�Ty ,xN.ji ,rDO ty`{{' :•2 a at ea � � , raga� I h x "R" �*"'4ss iy r +t ;; kc°. ^.tC•rt^�.< zt�G-{. ��f���•4.�1�"1s��y� •P. �.��?�+,,�n�,,yr �?�x �� i WN i'.. tA 1+ _'Y tt ,.1 t2PV " F` f �T 'tit "'' „ mg �U. s ,+xk � ` , ��''�+: xLf .F .�q �y. f3�?v. �y'l e}c S+,7 s-xh�ir �FO 'iifa1{ 11/5/97r�t, 5�� ' �� >� Y sf t > , � , � �� ;��5 i� }lFy+ Yt�yd tt ? st,. s. ^ �� 4` crL� } y t�i �t ' ,y ^+�11MO w }` 3iy.�'�a�f`§'"' 1 12/5/97 ' fi �� aN ' `' aC iX oi 'ht � t}�YmRx } c� . Y � 2'pF Mt*�X •r' �7 r7 r �,. u �, � fK,wy? 5r, O Qm 7�Cr ' i P S w e2 lrr yam= tart # W t F.+ `1/5/98 aa4 ovA �a {`av' --' f s y';}� r `t. y�r .X'i°' ~' �1� >^• f; ,�'r �• IN w S"# ,'y.A "ii ri. Gam' l� °.aa' 4utf��n l., r• �,�.I O �f b^•P, y d i J v� f,, i )� ..7tmy,�„ t.fi 3 '' t�f�'^`;3�' + }'' I,+ 1/26/98 Mla �.. '�tq}�,�D7 ,1��`f �i``e ems^ :r�� d•�-..- � ti� 1 9A u ��S C^t. - Y {'k r 1TT ~� l/�V 2/5/98 �� � ' 1',- Y- iv'r , ��i '.. .kt -ir'' 7Y�' sq��,,vv' �n',<Y3�'',�,,j'��'E• '�,7� +�iD �� Si ''t`�` +. r.'� �'.;�xtut - �J . 2/23/98 r+ �,„ 'w ` ' CD Xa S, r 3 G'� •x �' � ' O V Ell ti IS 3/10/98 ON al- • �� {i`��r_ k�' +r � 5,.-"' . tt�'r 5s�,.� .��yR s�,dl�` 6 �res,� 4/7/98 + r� �°� 7" �' 9 }7�p'` � � e r v r� Mill A� rC�/,�� � *.�y��l�Y•�p: ��t t'�4 'n�yy��yr�^Na� 7�"'a"y,F .'y ���+ii3 >' ,,,�`�r - 1� • ,�,;,ggg 4/24/98 Tyy1��=1�t4 V1,91, �x{t 1'�'F Yy• +J�'' ,`�y+�Tr r. ,� j �!}x"�'s s S r i t 'r Al r�,U' .. 5/7/98 n y�,.,">'�,a >a.. ,v v'S�r.. A. �r." 9 .'y .�x �✓. l � a, ;r$ vu,C7"g.Y*r•s N7IN �sy<��$ru 'f?t�'v { t 'fi+ �'rL+,"`. 7rL nrr �• 5/20/987 �� �� vgg •+ "T '1"' "+r '� �'` `-{+Z.�.tb ' u y �,t Tom.y''t`Y';', �fy'� d".+ r! �y;'¢ram `T l�-F$my } F T z d J 6/8/98 '+e. �+ rr4v'`g+4irr�''yt *e.j .u`.'•' ,J,A N'7' >�c,. Y�}. ,1 't I;,FSy'.r<i.�+ i'may` �q 551 'r..' O, iti �,;.�• }r'�lt i�, f k . 0.a.,.a�cS +"' y`'+" i.F ,d ,c'di,kt Yogi r c s L X rS1 E SYtf 4 $ta b ? A Fk� �'�`'a.< �P�.f°,,2 r `•tt'.j �.'�'�'�s�1r��'i t''+�"t k ���s�� ,t��.�c� y CO 6/29/98 �• .�, tn` '�e s` X , ^¢a� f+ ,� *}fit t�k§x` �' O if i� �a 3 tiw a � 7 n c rf y,� rti1 a7 tig tt�gd Z p tIE,54 r tityr <f�a rYv534 q 5�� ti. r � n>SC y ss 7/20/98 � p'�Pn t, iy v s� �Y rgr r4 layY fiu r s i 7 s tir 3'"4�v i�'�, ..w f!'NT"x•.�,.,.i... �.5....,,.....? ,i17 .1.wr, fi°:t..c'... Y.''�S i 21 Geology— Soils - Slopes (.4 This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 1.6.18.030 relative to Geology—Soils - Slopes. . Geology Hazards / Unusual Features Alluvial deposits derived from the mountains south of Bozeman underlie Valley. West Subdivision. The geology does not offer geologic hazards or other unusual features that limit the suitability of the land for the proposed uses. The project area generally slopes from south to north at approximately 1.25 percent. The . site is essentially flat from east to west with mild variations adjacent to streams that run from the south to the north. Ground water issues are addressed in the section titled Groundwater. The site is located in Seismic Zone 3, is a seismically active region. The risk of . earthquake damage, however, is no greater than in the remainder of the Gallatin Valley. This risk will be minimized by adherence ' to appropriate building standards. Soils According to NRCS information, seven soil types exist on the site. The map boundaries and distribution of soil types within the boundary of the development are displayed on the Valley West Subdivision Soils Map included in this section: This exhibit is derived from the NRCS Gallatin County Soil Survey Map. Detailed NRCS data is provided at the end of this section. Soils underlying the Valley West Subdivision are similar to those found throughout Bozeman. They are typically dark colored loams underlain by gravel. Limitations to development are primarily depth to groundwater, bearing capacity, frost heave potential, shrink-swell potential and flooding. The limitations posed by these soils are well known in the Bozeman area. Engineering and common . construction practices have proven that the limitations .can be overcome successfully .without extreme or undo expense: Ferguson, Babcock, .and Cottonwood roads have been constructed and are in use by the public. Water mains and sewer trunk systems are in place and ready for service demonstrating that construction ground water issues are very manageable. Cuts and Fills Owing to the flat terrain,. cuts and fills in excess of three feet are limited to areas. where over-excavation is called for in road, drainage and sanitary. sewer ' • construction, or to improve the natural drainage of the site. To minimize erosion, the construction contract shall provide for seeding of slopes in the cut and fill 1 areas. Material for site. grading will generally be obtained on site and all disturbed areas will be seeded. Mulching or placement of erosion control mats (. will be used as necessary. Methods of erosion control and revegetation shall be in -conformance to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) Montana Sediment a:nd Erosion Control Manual. An MPDES Stormwater Erosion Control Plan using Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be prepared for all construction activities for review and approval by the MDEQ. Typical Best Management Practices for disturbed areas typically. include: Ground cover and topsoil replacement; mulching; hydromulch seeding and hand seeding native .grass species; sediment trapping fabric fences; protection of culvert outlets; and . temporary straw bale swale protection. The construction contract will include erosion control measures to address erosion during construction. Included as pay items in the contract .will be financial incentives for the contractor to comply with the Stormwater Master Plan. Payment to the contractor will be contingent on the completion of the measures prior to the contractor starting other work on the project that will disturb soil. 2 I I 1 . . .. .. .. .. • ■ ■■ ..Mo . MOM Mo Mo • ■ ■■ .■ . IS.. .. .. ... i�_ rr oil,a ai ■ sm.0- �11■n - .a__e: i i��i■�a" :: � . 1 ■■ Imo,■I■= _ II ■■ 111■■ARM 1■: -� gi LAI �� r 0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29401 BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT consultants (The information, in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation) I I I I I Map symbol 'Shallow I Dwellings I Dwellings Small Local roads I Lawns and and soil name excavations I without I with I commercial I and streets I landscaping I I basements I basements I buildings I 1 509B: I I I I 1 Enbar-----------Isevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISlight I cutbanks cave,l flooding I flooding, I flooding I .frost action I I wetness I I wetness I I I . I I I I I I 53B: 1 1 1 1 1 1 Amsterdam-------ISlight ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: ISlight I I I I I frost action, I i I I I low strength • I I I � I I Hyalite---------Severe: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: Moderate: IModerate: I cutbanks cave I large stones I large stones, I large stones I frost action, I droughty, I I I wetness I I large stones I large stones I 1 I I I Beaverton-------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: IModerate: I cutbanks cave,I large stones I large stones I large stones I large stones I droughty, I large stones I I I I I large stones, I I I I I I small stones I I I I I I 537A: I I I I I I Lamoose---------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: IModerate: I cutbanks cave, I wetness. I wetness I wetness I frost action I wetness wetness I I I I 510B: ,Ieadowcreek-----ISevere: IModerate: ISevere: IModerate: ISevere: ISlight I cutbanks cave,I wetness I wetness I wetness I frost action I I wetness I I I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I I I Turner----------ISevere: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: I cutbanks cave I shrink-swell wetness I shrink-swell I frost action, I droughty, I I I I I shrink-swell I large stones 0 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I Hyalite---------ISevere: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: I cutbanks cave I large stones I large stones I large stones I frost action, I droughty, I I I I I large stones I large stones I I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued .• consultants Map symbol Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads Lawns and and soil name excavations without ! with commercial and streets landscaping I basements basements buildings 748A (con.) : I Beaverton-------Severe: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: (Moderate: 1 ,cutbanks cave I large stones I large stones I large stones I frost action, I droughty, large stones I large 'stones, small atones l_ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION* SERVICE 10/29/01 .. BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT Endnote -- BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT This report shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect shallow excavations, dwellings with and without basements, small commercial buildings, local roads and streets, and lawns and landscaping. The limitations are "Slight", "Moderate", or "Severe". The limitations are considered "Slight" if soil properties and site features are generally favorable for the indicated use and limitaions are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties or site features are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to . overcome or minimize the limitations; and "Severe" if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so difficult to overcome that special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased • maintenance are required. Special feasibility studies may be required where the soil limitations are severe. SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for basements, graves, utility lines, open ditches, and other purposes. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. The ease of digging, filling, and compacting is affected by the depth to bedrock, a cemented pan, or a very firm dense layer; stone content; soil texture; and slope. The time of the year that excavations can be made is affected by the depth to a seasonal high water table and the susceptibility of the soil to flooding. The resistance of the excavation walls or bands to sloughing or caving is affected by soil texture and the depth to the water table. DWELLINGS AND SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS are structures built on shallow foundations on undisturbed soil. The load limit is the same as that for single-family dwellings no higher than three stories. Ratings are made for small co ercial buildings without basements, for dwellings with basements, and for dwellings without basements. The ratings •d on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. A high water table, depth to bedrock s cemented pan, large stones, slope, and flooding affect the ease of excavation and construction. Landscaping and grading that require cuts and fills of more than 5 or 6 feet are not considered. LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or stabilized soil material, and a flexible or rigid surface. Cuts and fills are generally properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, a high water table, flooding, large stones, and slope affect the ease of excavating and grading. Soil strength (as inferred from the engineering classification of-the soil), shrink-swell potential, frost action potential, and depth to a high water table affect the traffic-supporting capacity. LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Soil reaction, a high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches, and the content of salts, sodium, and sulfidic materials affect plant growth. ' Flooding, wetness, slope, stoniness,.and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer affect trafficability after vegetation is established. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • • PAGE 1 OF 4 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS consultants (The information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation) Map symbol I Roadfill I Sand I Gravel I Topsoil and soil name I I I I I I I 509B: I I I I Enbar-----------IFair: (Probable (Probable (Poor: I wetness I I I area reclaim I I I I 53B: I I I I Amsterdam-------IGood (Improbable: ]Improbable: (Good I I excess fines I excess fines I I I I I 448A: I I I I Hyalite---------IFair: (Probable (Probable (Poor: I large stones I I I area reclaim,. I I I' I small stones, I I I I too sandy I I I I Beaverton-------(Poor: (Improbable: (Improbable: (Poor: I large stones I large stories I large stones I area reclaim, I I I I small stones, ] I I I too sandy I I I I 537A: I I I I Lamoose---------IFair: (Probable (Probable (Poor: I wetness I I I area reclaim, I I I I small stones I I I •I 510B: I I I Meadowcreek-----IFair (Probable (Probable (Poor: wetness I I I area reclaim, I I I I small stones, I I I I too sandy I I I I 457A: I I I I Turner----------IGood IProbabie (Probable (Poor: I I I I area reclaim, I I I I small stones ! I I I 7481 I I I I Hya.. a---------IFair: (Probable (Probable (Poor: I large stones I I I area reclaim, I I I I small stones, I I I I too sandy I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 4 'TATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued consultants Map symbol Roadfill Sand Gravel Topsoil and soil name 748A (con.): Beaverton-------Fair: jProbable jProbable Poor: large stones I I I area reclaim, 1 1 -small stones, too sandy • • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • PAGE 3 OF 4 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS Endnote -- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS -his -report gives information about the soils as a source of roadfill, sand, gravel,'and topsoil. The soils are rated "Good", "Fair", or "Poor" as a source of roadfill and topsoil. They are rated as a "Probable" or "Improbable" source of sand and gravel. The ratings are based on soil properties and site features that affect the removal of the soil and its use as construction material. Normal compaction, minor processing, and other standard construction practices are assumed. Each soil is evaluated to a depth of 5 or 6 feet. Roadfill is soil material that is excavated in one place and used in road embankments in another place. In this report, :he soils are rated as a source of roadfill for low embankments, generally less than 6 feet high and less exacting in design than higher embankments. The ratings are for the soil material below the surface layer to a depth of 5 or 6 feet. It is assumed that soil layers will be mixed during excavating and spreading. Many soils have layers of contrasting suitability within their profile. The report entitled Engineering Index Properties is also available and it provides detailed information about each soil layer. This information can help determine the suitability of each layer for use as roadfill. The performance of soil after it is stabilized with lime or cement is not considered in the ratings. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. The thickness of suitable material is a major consideration. The ease of excavation is affected by large stones, a high water table, and slope. How well the soil performs in place after it has been compacted and drained is determined by its strength (as inferred from the engineering classification of the soil) and shrink-swell potential. Soil_ -ated "Good" contain significant amounts of sand or gravel or both. They have at least 5 feet.of suitable ( • material, a low shrink-swell potential, few cobbles and stones, and slopes of 15 percent or less. Depth to the rater table is more than 3 feet Soils rated "Fair" have more than 35 percent silt- and clay-sized particles and have a plasticity of less than 10. "hey have a moderate shrink-swell potential, slopes of 15 to 25 percent, or many stones. Depth to the water table is 1 to 3 feet. Soils rated "Poor" have a plasticity index of more than 10, a high shrink-swell potential, many stones, or slopes of more than 25 percent. They are wet, and the depth to the water table is less than 1 foot. These soils may have layers of suitable material, but the material is less than 3 feet thick. Sand and gravel are natural aggregates suitable for commercial use with a minimum of processing. Sand and gravel are used in many kinds of construction. Specifications for each use vary'widely. In this report only the probability of finding material in suitable quantity is evaluated. The suitability of the material for specific purposes is not evaluated, nor are factors that affect excavation of the material. The properties used to evaluate the soil as a source of sand or gravel are gradation of grain sizes (as indicated by the engineering classification of the soil), the thickness of suitable material, and the content of rock fragments. Kinds of rock, acidity, and stratification are given in the soil series descriptions. .Gradation of grain sizes is given in the Engineering Index Properties report. A soil rated as a "Probable" source has a layer of clean sand and gravel or a layer of sand or gravel that contains up to 12 percent silty fines. This material must be at least 3 feet thick and less than 50 percent, by weight, large . stones. All other soils are rated as an "Improbable" source. Coarse fragments of soft bedrock, such as shale and silt te, are not considered to be sand and gravel. • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 4 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 • CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS Endnote• CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS--Continued i',opsoil is used to cover an area so that vegetation can be established and maintained. The upper 40 inches of a soil is evaluated for use as topsoil. Also evaluated is the reclamation potential of the borrow area. Plant growth is affected by toxic material and by such properties as soil reaction, available water capacity, and fertility. The ease of excavating, loading, and spreading is affected by rock fragments, slope, a water table, soil texture, and thickness of suitable material. Reclamation of the borrow area is affected by slope, a water table, rock fragments, bedrock, and toxic material. Soils rate "Good" have friable loamy material to a depth of at least 40 inches. They are free of stones and cobbles, . have little or no gravel, and have slopes of less than 8 percent. They are low in content of soluble salts, are naturally fertile or respond well to fertilizer, and are not so wet that excavation is difficult. Soils rated "Fair" are sandy soils, loamy soils that have a relatively high content of clay, soils that have only 20 to 40 inches of suitable material, soils that have an appreciable amount of gravel, stones, or soluble salts, or soils that have slopes of 8 to 15 percent. The soils are not so wet that excavation is difficult. Soils rate "Poor" are very sandy or clayey, have less than 20 inches of suitable material, have a large amount of gravel, stones, or soluble salts, have slopes of more than 15 percent, or have,a seasonal water table at or near the surface. The surface layer of most soils is generally preferred for topsoil because of it organic matter content. Organic matter greatly increases the absorption'and retention of moisture and nutrients for plant growth. J.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 1 IATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 PRIME FARMLAND consultants Map Soil name .ymbol l I i09B JENBAR LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES (where irrigated) -3B JAMSTERDAM SILT LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES (where irrigated) ;10B JMEADOWCREEK LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES (where irrigated) :57A ITURNER LOAM, MODERATELY WET, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES (where irrigated) • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ' PAGE 1 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 HYDRIC SOILS LIST MAPUNITS WITH HYDRIC COMPONENTS consultants The "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or ":Ion-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491, ;?une, 1991: The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by section 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils", endnote to --o determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. I I I I I FSA Criteria and I Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I Map Symbol IComponent(C)/I I I Mapunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I Landform I Criteria ISaturationlFloodinglPonding IConditionl Needs I I I I I Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial of Soil Ion-Site I I I I I I I I I I I 537A: I I I I I I I I I LMOOSE SILT LOAM, 0 Too O ERCENT SLOPES---ILamoose (C)--I YES IStream Terracel 2B3 YES I No I NO I I I IBonebasin (I)I YES ITerrace 12B3,3 I YES I NO I YES I I IMeadowcreek I I I I I I I I I I (I)---------I NO I I I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • PAGE 2 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 HYDRIC SOILS LIST • MAPUNITS WITH HYDRIC INCLUSIONS consultants The "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or "Non-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491, June, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by Section 512.11(h)(4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1.991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils" endrote to to determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. I I I I I FSA Criteria and Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I Map Symbol IComponent(C)/I I I I I Mapunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I I Landform I Criteria ISaturationlFloodinglPonding IConditionl Needs I I Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial of Soil Ion-Site I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 509B: I I I I I I I I I I ENBAR LOAM, 0 TO 4 I I I I I I I I I I PERCENT SLOPES--------IEnbar-(C)----I NO I I I I I I I I INythar.(I)---I YES IFlood Plain 12B3 I YES I NO I NO' (Straw (I;----I NO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 51OB: I I I I I I I I I I MEADOWCREEK LOAM, 0 I I I I I I I I I I TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES---;Meadowcreek I I I I I I I I I I (C)---------I NO I I I I I I I I IBlossberg (I) I YES ITerrace 1283 I YES I NO I NO I I I (Beaverton (I)I NO I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 HYDRIC SOILS LIST NON-HYDRIC MAPUNITS consultants The "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or "Non-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491, June, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by Section 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils" endnote to to determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. FSA 'Criteria and I Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I Mao Symbol 1Component(C)/I I I I I Mapunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I I I I Landform I Criteria ISaturationlFloodinglPonding IConditionl Needs I I I I I Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial 'of Soil IOn-Site I I I I I I I I I I I 53B: I I I I I I I I I I AMSTERDAM SILT LOAM, �4 PERCENT SLOPES-Amsterdam (C) l NO I IQuagle (I)---I No IBlackdog (I)-I NO I I I I I I I Bowery (I)---I NO I I I I I I Meagher (I)--I NO I I I I I I I I 448A: HYALITE-BEAVERTON I I I I I I I I I COMPLEX, MODERATELY I I I I I I I I I WET, 0 TO 2 PERCENT I I I I I I I I SLOPES----------------(Hyalite (C)--I NO I I I I I I I (Beaverton (C)l NO I I I I I I I (Beaverton (I)l NO I I ( I I I I IMeadowcreek I I I I I I I I I (I)---------I NO 457A: I I I I I I I I I TURNER LOAM, I I I I I I I I I I MODERATELY WET, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES------Turner (C)---I NO I I I I I I I I IBeaverton (I)I NO I I I I I I I I ITurner (I)---I NO I I I I I I I IMeadowcreek I I I I I I I (I)---------I NO I I I I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 HYDRIC SOILS LIST NON-HYDRIC MAPUNITS--Continued consultants . The "Hydric Soil`s Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or "Non-Hydric". These'criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491, June, .1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by Section 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils" endnote to to determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. I I I I I FSA Criteria and ] Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I Map Symbol IComponent(C)/I I I I I Mapunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I I Landform I Criteria ]Saturation]Flooding]Ponding IConditionl Needs I Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial of Soil IOn-Site I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 748A: HYALITE-BEAVERTON ] I I I I I I I I COMPLEX, 0 TO 4 I I I I I I I I I I PE' SLOPES--------(Hyalite (C)I-I NO I I I I I I I I (Beaverton (C) l NO I I I I I I I I �,• ITurner (I)---I No ] I I I I I I I ]Hyalite (I)--I NO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE :PAGE 5 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE :'.• HYDRIC SOILS CRITERIA CODES AND DEFINITIOlIS Endnote -- HYDRIC SOILS LIST The column 'Natural Condition of the Soil' indicates the following information: !wooded' indicates the soil supports woody vegetation under natural condition; 'Farmable' indicates the soil can be farmed under natural conditions without removing woody vegetation or other manipulation; and 'Neither' indicates neither.of the above conditions are met. 1. All Histosols; except Folists, or 2. Soils in Aquic suborders,'great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Aquisalids, Pachic subgroups, or Cumulic subgroups that are: a. somewhat poorly drained with a water table equal to 0.0 foot (ft.) from the surface during the growing season, or b. poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: (1) water table equal to 0.0 ft. during the growing season if textures are coarse sand, sand, or fine sand in all layers within 20 inches (in.), or for other soils, or (2) water table at less than or equal to 0.5 ft. from the surface during the growing season if permeability is equal to or greater than 6.0 in/hour (h.) in. all layers within 20 in., or (3) water table at less than or equal to 1.0 ft. from the surface during the growing season, if permeability is less than 6.0 in./h. in any layer within 20 in., or • % that are frequently ponded for long or.very long duration during the growing season, or a. Soils that are frequently flooded for long or very long duration during the growing season. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE' PAGE 1 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES consultants I I 1 Classification I Fragments 1 Percentage passing I Map symbol I Depth I USDA texture I I ] sieve number-- 'ILiquidl Plas- and soil name I I i I >10 1 3-10 l 1 limitlticity ] I I Unified I AASHTO linchesl_nchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1 .lindex I In I I I I Pct I Pct I I I I I Pct I 509B: Enbar-----------1 0-22 ILoam ICL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 180-100175-100160-85 150-75 1 20-301 '5-10 1 22-49 ILoam, sandy ICL-ML, MI; IA-4 1 0 1 0 180-100175-100160-85 150-75 1 20-301 NP-10 I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 49-60 Ivery gravelly IGM, GP-GM IA-1, A-2 1 0 1 0-10 125-60 115-50 110-40 1 5-30 1 15-251 NP-5 I I sandy loam, I I I I I I I I I 1 I I very gravelly I I I, loamy sand, I I I I I I I I I I I. I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly sandyl I I I I I I I I loam 1 I I I I I I I I 53 lam-------I 0-8 (Silt loam ICL-ML 1A-4 1 0 1 0 j 100 1' 100 195-100175-95 1 25-301 5-10 .. 1 8-15 ]Silt loam, verylCL, CL-ML IA-4, A-6 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-95 1 25-351 5-15 I fine sandy I I loam, silty I ] I I I I I I I I I clay loam I I 1 I I 1 15-42 ISilt loam, very]CL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 1 25-301 5-10 I I fine sandy I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 42-60 ISilt loam, verylCL-ML, ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100170-90 1 20-301 NP-10 I I fine sandy 1 I I I I I I I I I I loam ] I I I I I I I ] • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • PAGE 2 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued • consultants I I J Classification l Fragments 1 Percentage.'passing 1 1 Map'-symbol I Depth I USDA texture I I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name I I I I I >10 1 3-10 I 1 limitlticity I Unified I AASHTO lincheslinchesl 4 I 10 1 40 1 200 l Jindex I I I I I I I I I I I I ._.In I I I I Pct 1 Pct I I I I I Pct I 44SA: I I I I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------1 0-5 1Loam ICL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0-10 195-100190-100175-95 155-75 1 25-301 5-10 1 5-8 IClay loam, ICL IA-6 10 1 0-10 190-100185-100175-90 160-80 1 30-351 10-15 I I loam, silty I I I I I I I I I I I I clay loam 1 8-17 IClay loam, JCL, GC, SC IA-6 I 0 1 0-15 165-95 160-90 155-80 146-75 1 30-351 10-15 1 I silty clay I I I loam, gravellyl I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 117-26 ]Very cobbly IGM, SM IA-1, A-2 1 0 130-55 135-65 130-60 120-50 110-25 1 20-351 NP-10 I I sandy clay 1 I I I I I I ] I I I I loam, very I I I I I ] I I I I ] I cobbly sandy I I I I I I I ] I I 1 I loam, I I I I I I ] I I I I extremely I I I I I ] I I I I �• I I cobbly sandy I ] loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 26-60 IVery cobbly IGM, GP-GM, IA-1 1 0 130-55 135-65 130-60 115-40 1 5-15 1 --- I NP I loamy sand, I SM, SP-SM l I I I I I I ] I I I very cobbly I I I I I I I ] I I I I sand, I I I I ] ] I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I cobbly coarse I I I sand I I J I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------1 0-4 lCobbly loam JCL-ML, SC-SM JA-4 1 0 115-30 175-95 170-90 160-80 145-65 1 25-301 5-10 1 4-14 IVery cobbly JGC, GC-GM, IA-2, A-4, A-61 0 130-50 150-75 145-70 130-60 125-50 1 25-351 5-15 I I clay loam, I SC, SC-SM 1 I I I I I I I I I I very cobbly I I I I I I I I I I I I sandy clay I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 14-60 (Extremely IGM, GP, IA-1 1 0 130-60 135-80 125-70 110-50 1 0-25 1 --- I NP I I cobbly loamy I GP-GM, SM I I sand. I I extremely I I I I J I I I I I I I cobbly sand, I I I J I I I I I I I I very cobbly 1 I I I I I I I I I I I loamy sand I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE . 3 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued consultants Classification Fragments Percentage passing Map symbol Depth USDA texture sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name 1 >10 1 3-10 1 1 limitIticity Unified I AASHTO linchesl_nchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 .1 . 1index In Pct Pct Pct 1 537A: Lamoose---------1 0-9 ISilt loam ICL,, CL-ML JA-4, A-6 1 0 1 0 180-100175-100170-95 155-90 1 25-351 5-15 1 9-27 ILoam, silt JCL, CL-ML, JA-2, A-4, A-61 0 1 0 155-100150-100145-95 130-85 1 25-351 5-15 loam, gravelly GC, GC-GM I I loam 1 27-60 IVery gravelly AGM, GP, GP-GMIA-1 1 0 1 0-20 125-55 120-50 110-40 1 0-15 1 0-141 NP loamy sand, very gravelly I { sand, I extremely gravelly sand reek-----I '0-11 (Loam JCL-ML IA'-4 ' 1 0 1' 0 195-100190-100170-95 150-75 1 20-301 5-10 1 11-25 ILoam, sandy JCL-ML, SC-SM JA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100170-90 140-75 1 20-301 5-10 loam, silt ! ' I I loam 1 25-60 IVery gravelly JGP, GP-GM IA-1 1 0 j 0-10 125-45 115-35 110-25 0-10 1 --- I NP I sand, . extremely gravelly sand, I I very gravelly I �. loamy sand 457A: I Turner----------1 0-6 ILoam JCL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0-10 180-100175-100165-95 150-75 1 25-301 5-10 6-12. lClay loam, JCL, GC, SC JA-6 1 0 1 0-10 165-100160-100155-90 135-70 1 30-401 10-20 . I silty clay I. . loam, gravelly �. I loam 1 12-26 jLoam, clay JCL, GC, SC JA-6 1 0 1 0-10 165-100160-100155-95 140775 1 30-401 10-15 loam, gravelly loam i 1 26-60 IVery gravelly IGM, GP, GP-GMIA-1 0 110-30 125-60 115-50 110-35 1 0-15 1 0-141 NP loamy sand, very gravelly I I sand, I I I extremely gravelly sand U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • PAGE 4 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued consultants Classification I Fragments I Percentage passing 1, Map symbol I Depth 1 USDA texture 1 I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name I.. I I I I >10 1 3-10 I 1 liinitlticity I Unified I AASHTO lincheslinchesl 4 1 30 1 40 1 200 I lindex In I I 1 I Pct I Pct J 1 1 = I I Pct .1 74BA: I I I I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------1 0-5 ILoam JCL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0-10 195-100190-100175-95 155-75. 1-25-30I 5-10 1 5-8 IClay loam, ICL IA-6 1 0 1 0-10 190-100185-100175-90 160-80 1 30-351 10-15 I I loam, silty I I I I I I I I I I I I clay loam I I I I I I I I I I I• 8-17 IClay loam, JCL, GC, SC IA-6 1 0 1 0-15 165-95 160-90 155-80 140'-75 1 30-351 10-15 I 1 silty clay I I I I I I I I I I 1 I loam, gravelly) I I I I I I I I l _ I loam I I I I I I I I I 1 17-26 IVery cobbly IGM, SM IA-1, A-2 1 0 130-55 135-65 130-60 120-50 110-25 120-351 NP-10 I I sandy clay 1 I I I I I I I I I I I loam, very 1 I I I I I I I I I cobbly sandy loam, I I I I � I I I I �I ;.•_ I. I extremely' 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 cobbly sandy 1 I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 26-60 IVery cobbly JGM, GP-GM, JA-1 1 0 130-55 135-65 130-60 115-40 1 5-15 1 --- 1 NP I I loamy sand, I SM, SP-SM I I I I I I I I I I I very cobbly I I I I I I I I I I I I sand, I I I I I I I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I cobbly coarse I I I I I I I I I I I I sand 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------1 0-7 ICobbly loam JCL-ML, SC-SM IA-4 1 0 115-30 175-95 170-90 160-80 145-65 1 25-301 5-10 1 7-14 IVery cobbly IGC, GC-GM, JA-2, A-4, A-61 0 120-40 145-70 140-60 135-55 120-40 .1 25-351 5-15 I I clay loam, I SC, SC-SM I I very cobbly : . I I 1 sandy clay I I I I I I I I I I I I loam, very 1 I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly clay I I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 14-60 (Extremely IGM, GP-GM, JA-1 1 0 125-50 130-75 120-65 110-50 1 5-15 1 --- J NP I I cobbly loamy I SM, SP-SM 1 I I I I I I I I I . I sand, I I I I I I I I I I I I extremely 1 I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly sand,) very cobbly I I I I I I I I I I I I loamy sand I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES Endnote -- 'ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES This report gives estimates of the engineering classification and of the range of index properties for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. Most soils have layers of contrasting properties within the upper 5 or 6 feet. DEPTH to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. The range in depth and information on other properties of each layer are given in the published Soil Survey for each soil series under "Soil Series and Their Morphology." TEXTURE is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that'is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is as much as about 15 percent, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Textural terms are defined in the Soil Survey Glossary. Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. The UNIFIED system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are classified according to grain-size distribution.of the.fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to 5..�'ty index, liquid limit,..and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW; GP,'GM, GC, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of grain-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7- 5, or A-7-6. As an additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. Rock FRAGMENTS larger than 3 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight percentage'. Percentage of soil particles passing designated sieves (PERCENTAGE PASSING SIEVE NUMBER--)is the percentage of the soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. LIQUID LIMIT and PLASTICITY INDEX (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. The estimates of grain-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index are generally rounded to the nearest 5 percent. Thus, anges of gradation and Atterberg limits extend a marginal amount (1 or 2 percentage points) across ication boundaries, the classification in the marginal zone is omitted in this report. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS consultants Map symbol Depth I Clay I Cation- I Soil I Calcium I Gypsum ISalinityl Sodium and soil name 1 I lexchange Ireaction Icarbonatel I (adsorption I I Icapacity I I I I I ratio I I I I I I In I Pct Imeq/100g I pH I Pct I Pct Immhos/cml 3098: I I I I I I I I Enbar-----------I 0-22 1 18-27120.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 1 0-5 I --- 1 0-2 1 --- .. 1 22-49 1 18-27110.0-15.01 7.4-8.4 1 0-10 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- 149-60 1 5-181 5.0-10.01 7.4-8.4 1 0-10 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- I I I I I I I I >3B: I I I I I I I I Amsterdam-------1 0-8 1 20-27115.0-20.01 6.6-7.3 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 1 8-15 1 18-30115.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 1 15-42 1 18-27115.0-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 15-35 1 --- I --- I -- 1 42-60 1 10-20110.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 1 --- I --- 1 0-2 1 --- :48A: I I I I I I I I HW---------1 0-5 1 18-27115.0=20.01 6.1-7.3 1 --- 1 --- 1' 7 1 - i 5,-8 1 25-35115.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- 1 ' 1 8-17 1 25-35115.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I I --- I 1 17-26 1 15-25110.0-15.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I -- 1 26-60 1 0-101 0.0-5.0 1 6.6-7.8 1 0-5 1 --- I --- I --- I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------1 0-4 1 20-27115.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 1 4-14 1 25-35115.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 1 14-60 1 0-101 1.0-5.0 1 7.4-8.4 1 5-15 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- I I I I I I I I s37A: I I I I I I I I Lamoose---------1 0-9 1 18-27121.0-30.01 7.4-8.4 1 --- I 1 0-4 I 1 9-27 -1 18-27117.0-26.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 1 27-60 1 0-101 3.0-4.0 1 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- • 51OB: I I Meadowcreek-----1 0-11 1' 18-25120.0-25.01 6.6-8.4 1 --- I --- 10-4 1- 1 11-25 1 18-25115.0-20.01 6.6-7.a 1 -- I --- 1 0-4 1 --- 1 25-60 1 0-5 1 1.0-5.0 1 6.1-7.a 1 - I --- 1 0-4 I --- I I I I I I I I ;57A: I I I I I I I I Turner----------1 0-6 1 15-27110.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 I --- I --- 1 --- 1 --- 1 6-12 1 25-35110.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 112-26 118-35110.0-20.01 7.4-8.4 1 5-15 1 --- I --- I --- 126-60 10-5 1 1.0-5.0 1 7.4-8.4 1 0-10 I --- 10-2 1 -- I I I I I I I I • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • PAGE 2OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS--Continued �• consultants Map symbol I Depth I Clay I Cation- I Soil I Calcium I Gypsum jSalinityf Sodium and soil name I••, I (exchange Ireaction Icarbonatel I (adsorption I Icapacity I I I I I. ratio I In I Pct Imeq/100g I pH I Pct I Pct Immhos/cml 74BA: I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I.1.0-5 118-27I15.0-20.0I 6.1-7.3 I --- I --- I --- I --- 15-8 125-35I15.0-25.0I 6.6-7.8 I --- I --- I --- I --- 18-17 125-35I15.0-25.0I 6.6-7.8 I --- I --- I --- I --- 117-26 115-25110.0-15.0I 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 126-60 10-10I 0.0-5.0 16.6-7.8 I 0-5 I --- --- I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------I 0-7 120-27I15.0-20.0I 6.6-7.8 I --- 17-14 125-35I15.0-20.0I 6.6-7.8 I --- I --- I --- I --- 114-60 10-10I 1.0-5.0 17.4-8.4 I 5-15 I --- 10-2 I --- I I I I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS Endnote -- CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS This report shows estimates of some characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates are given for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. CLAY as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In this report, the estimated clay content of each major soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The amount and kind of clay greatly affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil. They determine the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink-swell potential, permeability, and plasticity, the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations. CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (CEC) is the total amount of cations held in a soil in such a way that they can be removed only by exchanging with another cation in the natural soil' solution. CEC is a measure of the ability of a soil to retain cations, some of,which are plant nutrients. Soils with low CEC hold few cations and may require more frequent applications of fertilizers than soils with high CEC. Soils with high CEC have the potential to retain cations, thus reducing the possibility of pollution of ground water: IWACTION is a measure of acidity or alkalinity and is expressed as a range in pH values. The range in pH of each major horizon is based on many field tests. For many soils, values have been verified by laboratory analyses. Soil reaction is important in selecting crops and other plants, in evaluating soil amendments for fertility and stabilization, and :n determining the risk of corrosion. CALCIUM CARBONATE is the percentage by weight of calcium carbonate in the fine-earth material, less than 2 millimeters in size. GYPSUM is the percentage by weight of hydrated calcium sulfates 20 millimeters cr smaller in size, in the soil. SALINITY is a measure of soluble salts in the soil at saturation. It is expressed as the electrical conductivity of the saturation extract, in millimhbs per centimeter at 25 degrees C. Estimates are based on field and laboratory measurements at representative sites of nonirrigated soils. The salinity of irrigated soils is affected by the quality of the irrigation water and by the frequency of water application. Hence, the salinity of soils in individual fields can differ greatly from the value given in the report. Salinity affects the suitability of a soil for crop production, the stability of soil if used as construction material, and " the potential of the soil to corrode metal and concrete. SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO (SAR) expresses the relative activity of sodium ions in • reactions in the soil. SAR is a measure of the amount of sodium relative to and magnesium in the water extract from saturated soil paste. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS consultants (Entries under "Erosion factors:-T" apply to the entire profile: Entries under "Wind erodibility group" and . "Wind erodability index" apply only to the surface layer) I I I I I I I (Erosion factorslwind (Wind Map symbol I Depth 1 Clay I Moist I Permea- (Available! Shrink- 10rganicl lerodi-Ierodi- and soil name 1 l i bulk I bility I water I swell I matterl I I Ibilitylbility I I I density I Icapacity Ipotentiall I K I Kf I T Igroup lindex I I I I I I I I I I_I I 1 In 1 Pct I g/cc 1 In/hr 1 In/in 1 1 Pct I I I I I 509B: 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Enbar-----------1 0-22 1 18-2711.15-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.20ILow 13.0-5.01 0.281 0.281 4 1 6 1 48 1 22-49 1 18-2711.35-1.551 0.60-2.00 10.14-0.181Low 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 . 1 49-60 1 5-1811.50-i.701 2.00-6.00 10.04-0.05ILow I --- 1 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 333: I I I I I I Amsterdam-------1 0-8 1 20-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.201Low 12.074.01 0.321 0.321 5 1 6 1 48 1 8-15 1 18-3011.20-1.401 0.20-0.60 16.17-0.20ILow 11.0-2.01 0.431 0.431 1 1 • 1 15-42 1 18-2711:25=1.451 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.20ILow. 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 I I ' 1 42-60 1 10-2011.25-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.19ILow 10.0-0.51 0.431 0.431 1 . 1 448A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------1 0-5 1 18-2711.10-1.201 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.19ILow 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 3 1 6 1 48 1 5-8 1 25-3511.30-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.16-0.191Moderate 11.0-3.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 8-17 125-35I1.30-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.12-0.17IModerate 11.0-3.01 0.151 0.321 1 1 1 17-26 1 15-2511.50-1.601 0.20-0.60 10.03-0.08ILow 10.5-1.01 0.051 0.321 1 1 1 26-60 1 0-1011.60-1.701 6.00-20.0010.02-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.171 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Beaverton-------1 0-4 1 20-2711.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.14-0.16ILow 11.0-3.01 0.201 0.371 2 1 6 1 48 1 4-14 1 25-3511.40-1.601 0.60-2.00 10.08-0.10ILow 11.0-2.01 0.101 0.321 1 1 1 14-60 1 0-1011.45-1.651 6.00-20-0010.03-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.021 0.201 1 1 537A: Lamoose-----=---1 0-9 1 18-2711.10-1.201 0.60-2.00 I0.17-0.21ILow 14.0-6.01 0.281 0.281 3 1 41, 1 86 1 9-27 1 18-27j1.15-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.181LOw 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 27-60 I .0-1011.60-1.751 6.00-20.0010.02-0.03ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I .51OB: I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Meadowcreek------1 0-11 1 18-2511.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.20ILow 12.0-5.01 0.371 0.371 3 1 5- 1 56 1 11-25 1 18-2511.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.13-0.15ILow 11.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 25-60 1 0-5 11.20-1.501 >20.00 10.02-0.03ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I ! I I I I I I I 0 ---- ---1 0-6 1 15-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.191Low 12.0-4.01 0.371 0.371 3 1 6 1 48 16-12 1 25-3511.30-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.12-0.18IModerate 10.5-2.01 0.241 0.371 1 1 1 12-26 1 18-3511.35-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.12-0.18IModerate 10.0-0.51 0.241 0.371 1 1 1 26-60 1 0-5 11.35-1.501 6.00-20.0010.01-0.06ILow 10.0-0.51 0:051 0.201 1 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • PAGE 2 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued consultants I I • I' I I' I I (Erosion factorslWind lwind Map symbol I Depth I Clay I Moist I Permea- 1Availablel Shrink- IOrganicl Ierodi-Ierodi- and soil name I I I bulk 1 bility I water I swell I matter] I I Ibilitylbility I I ! density 1 Icapacity 1potentiall . 1 K I Kf I T ]group lindex I I I I I I I I I I_I I I ' in I Pct I g/cc 1 In/hr I In/in I I Pct I I I I I 748A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------1 0-5 1 18-2711.10-1.201 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.19ILow 12.0-4.01 0.281 0.281 3 1 6 1 48 1 5-8 1 25-35I1.30-1.401 0.20-0.,60 10.16-0.19IModerate 11.0-3.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 8-17 1 25-3511.30-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.12-0.17IModerate 11.0-3.01 0.151 0.321 1 1 1 17-26 1 15-2511.50-1.601 0.20-0.60 10.03-0.08ILow 10.5-1.01 0.051 0.32I 1 1 1 26-60 1 0-1011.60-1.701 6.00-20.0010.02-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.171 1 I I I I I I ] I I I I I I Beaverton-------1 0-7 1 20-27I1.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.14-0.16ILow 11.0-3.01 0.171 0.371 2 1 6 1 48 1 7-14 1 25-3511.40-1.601 0.60-2.00 10.08-0.101Low 10.5-1.01 0.101 0.371 1 1 1 14-60 1 0-1011.55-1.751 6.00-20.0010.03-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.021 0.101 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I_I I • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS Eadnote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS This report shows estimates of some characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates are given for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. CLAY as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In this report, the estimated clay content of each major soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The amount and kind of clay greatly affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil. They determine the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink-swell potential, permeability, plasticity, the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations. MOIST BULK DENSITY is the weight of soil (ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity, the moisture content at 1/3 bar moisture tension. weight is determined after drying the soil at 105 degrees C. In 'this report, the estimated moist bulk density of each major soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Bulk density data are used to compute shrink-swell potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space available for w0nd roots. A bulk density.of more than 1.6 can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist isity is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter, and soil structure.' PER-MEABILITY refers to the ability of a soil to transmit water or air. The estimates indicate the rate of downward movement of water when the soil is saturated. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Permeability is considered in the design of soil drainage systems, septic tank absorption fields, and construction where the rate of water movement under saturated conditions affects behavior. AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of storing for use by plants. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each major soil layer. :he capacity varies, depending on soil properties that affect the retention of water and the depth of the root zone. The most important properties are the content of organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil structure. Available water capacity is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in the design and management of irrigation systems. Available water. capacity is not an estimate.of the quantity of water actually available to plants at any given.time. SHRINK-SWELL POTENTIAL is the potential for volume change in a soil with a loss or gain of moisture. Volume change occurs mainly because of the interaction of clay minerals with water and varies with the amount and type of clay minerals in the soil. The size of the load on the soil and the magnitude of the change in soil moisture content influence the amount of swelling of soils in place. Laboratory measurements of swelling of undisturbed clods were made for many soils. For others, swelling was estimated on the basis of the kind and amount of clay minerals in the soil and on measurements of similar soils. If the shrink-swell potential is rated moderate to very high, shrinking and swelling can cause damage to buildings, roads, and other structures. Special design is often needed. Shrink-swell potential classes are based on the change in length of an unconfined clod as mo' re content is increased from air-dry to field capacity. The change is based on the soil fraction less millimeters in diameter. The classes are "Low," a change of less than 3 percent; "Moderate," 3 to 6 r.106 and "High," more than 6 percent. "Very high," greater than 9 percent, is sometimes used. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS (` Endnote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued ORGANIC MATTER is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. In report J, the estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is ' less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained or increased by. returning crop residue to the soil. Organic matter affects the available water capacity, infiltration rate, and tilth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops. EROSION FACTOR K indicates the susceptibility of the whole soil (including rocks and rock fragments) to sheet and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) ' to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by.sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter (up to 4 percent) and on soil structure and permeability. values of K range from 0.05 to 0.69. The higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. EROSION FACTOR Kf is like EROSION FACTOR K but it is for the fine-earth fraction of the soil. Rocks and` rock fragments are not considered. EROSION FACTOR T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. WIN IDIBILITY GROUPS are made up.of soils..that have similar properties affecting their resistance to wind �:• eros.-., in cultivated areas. The groups indicate the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion. Soils are grouped according to the following distinctions: 1. Coarse sands, sands, fine sands, and very fine sands. These soils are generally no: suitable for crops. They are extremely erodible, and vegetation is difficult to establish. 2. Loamy coarse sands, loamy sands, loamy fine sands, loamy very fine sands, and sapric soil material. These soils are very highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 3. Coarse sandy loams, sandy loams, fine sandy loams, and very fine sandy loams. These soils are highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 4L. Calcareous loams, silt loams, clay loams, and silty clay loams. These soils are erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 4. Clays, silty clays, nonca?careous clay loams, and silty clay loams that are more than 35 percent clay. These soils ce moderately erodible. Crops can be grown if measures to • -untrol wind erosion are used. i • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/61 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS Endnote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued S. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are less than 20 percent clay and sandy clay loams, sandy clays, and hemic soil material. These soils are slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used. 6. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are more than 20 percent clay and noncalcareous clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay. These soils are very slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if ordinary measures to control wind erosion are used. 7. Silts, noncalcareous silty clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay, and fibric soil material. These soils are very slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if ordinary measures to control wind erosion are used. 8. Soils that are not subject to wind erosion because of coarse fragments on the surface or because of surface wetness. 0_4D ERODIBILITY INDEX is used in the wind erosion equation (WEQ). The index number indicates the amount of soil lost in tons per acre per year. The range of wind erodibility index numbers is 0 to 300. • i • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 WATER FEATURES consultants I ( 'Flooding I 'High water table and ponding I I I Map symbol (Hydro-I I I I Water I I I I Maximum and soil name Ilogic I Frequency I Duration I Months I table I Kind of I Months I Ponding I ponding ' Igroup I I I I depth '(water table I duration I depth I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I Ft I I I I Ft I I I I I I I I I 509B: I I I I I Enbar-----------I B IRare (Brief I JAN-JUL 12.0-3.5 (Apparent I Apr-Jul I --- I --- I � � I I I I I ��• 53B: I I I I I I I I I Amsterdam-------I B --- I 448A: Hyalite---------I B I --- I --- I --- 14.0-8.0 (Apparent I May.-Aug I --- I =.-- I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------I B I --- I --- I --- 14.0-8.0 (Apparent I May-Aug --- I 53 • ' I I I I � I I. �---------I D I -- I --- I --- 11.0-2.0 (Apparent .I Apr-qul I --- I --- • 510B: I I I I I I I I Meadowcreek-----I C I --- I --- I - - 12.0-3.5 (Apparent I Apr-Jun I --- I --- I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I I I I Turner- ---------I B I --- I --- I --- 14.0-8.0 (Apparent I May-Aug I --- I --- ( 748A: I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I B --- I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------I B I --- --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 WATER FEATURES , Endnote -- WATER FEATURES This report gives estimates of various soil water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Hydrologic soil groups are used to estimate runoff from precipitation. Soils not protected by vegetation are assigned to one of:four groups. They are grouped according to the infiltration of water when the soils are thoroughly wet*and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group " A". Soils having a high infiltration rate _(low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group "B"..:Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group "C". Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group "D". Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a permanent high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to two hydrologic groups in'this report, the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Flooding, the temporary inundation of an area, is caused.by overflowing.streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, nor is water in swamps and marshes. This report gives the frequency and duration of flooding and the time of year when flooding is most likely. Frequency, duration, and probable dates of occurrence are estimated. Frequency is expressed as "None", "Rare", "Occasional", and "Frequent". "None" means that flooding is not probable; "Rare" that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions; "Occasional" that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years; and "Frequent" that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years. Duration is expressed as "Very brief" if less than 2 days, "Brief" if 2 to 7 days, "Long" if 7 to 30 days, and "Very lon more than 30 days. The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely thin strata of gravel, • sant-. -ilt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; r and absence of distinctive horizons that form in soils that are not subject to flooding. Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 WATER FEATURES Endnote -- WATER FEATURES--Continued Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. High water table (seasonal) is the highest level of a saturated zone in the soil in most years. The depth to a seasonal high water table applies to,undrained soils. The estimates are' based mainly on the evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or mottles in the soil. Indicated in this report are the depth to the seasonal high water table; the kind of water table, that is, "Apparent", "Artesian", or "Perched"; and the months of the year that the water table commonly is high. A water table that is seasonally high for less than 1 month is not indicated in this report. An "Apparent" water table is a thick zone of free water in the soil. It is indicated by the level at which water stands in an uncased borehole after adequate time is allowed for adjustment in the surrounding soil. An "Artesian" water table exists under a hydrostatic beneath an impermeable layer. When the impermeable.layer has been penetrated by a cased borehole, the water rises. The final level of the water in the cased borehole is characterized as an artesian water table. A "Perched" water table is water standing above an unsaturated zone. In places an upper, or "Perched", water table is, separated from a lower one by'a dry zone. Only saturated zones within a depth of about 6 feet are td Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. The water is removed only by deep percolation, .transpiration, evaporation, or a combination of these processes. This report gives the depth and duration of ponding and the time of year when ponding is most likely. Depth, duration, and probable dates of occurrence are estimated. Depth is expressed as the depth of ponded water in feet above the soil surface. Duration is expressed as "Very brief" if less than 2 days, "Brief" if 2 to 7 days, "Long" if 7 to 30 days, and "Very long" if more than 30 days. The information is based on the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic ponding and on local information about the extent and levels of ponding. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 2 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 SOIL FEATURES consultants I Bedrock , I Cemented pan 'I. Subsidence I I Risk of corrosion I I I I Potential I Map symbol I I I I I I (frost action) Uncoated I and soil name I Depth IHardnessl Depth I Kind Iinitiall Total I I' steel I Concrete I I I I I I I I I I In I I In I I In I In I I I I I I I I I I I I 509B: I I I I I I I I I Enbar-----------I --- i --- I --- I I --- I --- (High (High. ILow I I I I I I I I I 53B: I I I I I I I I I Amsterdam-------I I --- I --- I I --- I --- IModerate" IHigh ILow 44BA: I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I I I --- I - I - - I --- IModerate IHigh ILow Beaverton-------I --- I - I --- I --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow 537A: I I I I I I I I -'- I --- I I --- . IHigh IHigh ILow ' _fe----------- I I I I I I I I I Meadowcreek-----) --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IHigh IModerate ILow I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I I I I I I Turner----------I I --- I -- I --- I - I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I 748A: I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I i I I I Beaverton-------I --- I --- I --- I --- I - - I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I I I • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 0 PAGE 2 OF 2 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 10/29/01 SOIL FEATURES �• Endnote -- SOIL FEATURES This report gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Depth to bedrock is given if bedrock is within a depth of 5 feet. The depth is based on many soil borings and on observations during soil mapping. The rock is either "Soft" or "Hard". If the rock is "Soft" or fractured, excavations can be made with trenching machines, backhoes, or small rippers. If the rock is "Hard" or massive, blasting or special equipment generally is needed for excavation. Cemented pans are cemented or indurated subsurface. layers within a depth of 5 feet. Such pans cause difficulty in excavation. Pans are classified as "Thin" or "Thick". A "Thin" pan is less than 3 inches thick if continuously indurated or less than 18 inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Excavations can be made by trenching machines, backhoes, or small rippers. A "Thick" pan is more than 3 inches thick if continuously indurated or more than 18 inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Such a pan is so thick or massive that blasting or special equipment is needed in excavation. Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence results from either desiccation and shrinkage or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage. Subsidence takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. This report shows the expected initial subsidence, which usually is a iesult of drainage, and total subsidence, which usually is a result of oxidation. Not s.." 'n the report is subsidence caused by an imposed surface load or by the withdrawal of ground water throughout • an ...,.ensive area as a result of lowering the water table. Potential frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the formation of segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost action occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density, permeability, content of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the potential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially drained. Silty and highly structured clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to frost action. Well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil strength during thawing cause damage mainly to pavements and other rigid structures. Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that dissolves or weakens uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle-size distribution,. acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on-the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special. site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors creates a severe corrosion environment. The steel installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than steel in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of corrosion, expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High", is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical resistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract'. For concrete, the risk of corrosion is also expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High". It is based on soil texture, acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract. f Vegetation This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Vegetation. On site vegetation is limited to grasses, forbs and a few locations with low- growing shrubs, such as wild roses, found along fence lines and near the drainage courses. There are no critical plant communities on site. A wetland delineation was completed on the property in the fall of 1994 (a copy of the report is on file with the City of Bozeman). The Army Corps of Engineers granted an individual 404 Permit calling for impacts to low value wetlands to be mitigated by creating a shallow wetland complex, two lakes, the relocation of the Baxter Ditch, and enhancement of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch and Baxter Creek. The areas identified for wetland enhancement are illustrated on the Valley West Wetland Enhancement Plan included in the section entitled Surface Water. Riparian areas along drainage courses are all subject to wetlands permits and mitigation measures outlined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit. These areas will be protected by stream corridor setbacks. . An application for a weed management plan for the subject property was .first applied for in December of 1998, in conjunction with the original Valley West Subdivision. Management plans were subsequently approved in August of 1999 for the subdivision and Bronken Park. Copies of the original application and the approved weed management plans and Memoranda of Understandings are attached. 1 MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING FOR SUBDIVISION PLANNING Cia�3tin Count (FINAL PLAT APPROVAL) i Weed Corttrol Projected date for Final Plat application District Date MOU received .is Memoranda of Understanding exists between the Gallatin County Weed Control District, reafter referred to as "District" and Bronken Park cr rierwe (Please Print Full Name) 3599 Sourdough Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 406-586-0160 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone). reinafter referred to as "Cooperator", for the purpose of addressing the issues of noxious weeds d the revegetation of disturbed areas on land(s) within Bronken Park in Valley West Subdivision (Name.of Subdivision) gal Description NETS , Sec. 10 , T. 2 /S, R. 5_6pn der this Memoranda, the Cooperator has been informed of, and has agreed to comply with, the xious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements of the Gallatin County Weed Control .>.rict, the Montana County Weed Control Act, and the Gallatin County Weed Control District's'`` xious Weed Management Plan as it relates to the above named property. While as a landowner, Cooperator will comply with the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements on early basis as needed. The Cooperator has also submitted to the Gallatin County Weed Control ice a copy of the Subdivision Covenants that complies with the Noxious Weed Management Plan .he District and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. d air upervisor Cooperator p 9 ite Date PY Memo To: Dennis Hengel, Gallatin County Weed Supervisor TiTETLAnns From:. Lynn Baoon,Wetland Specialist EST;INC. Date: August 2, 1999 . Re: Bronken Sports Complex Weed Mangement Plan Cc: Bob Lee, Morrison Maiede, Inc.; Brian Troth, President, Adam Bronken Sports Complex, Inc. Park The Bronken Sports Complex Weed Management and Revegetation Plan(Preliminary Plat Approval)' was submitted to you at the Gallatin County Weed Control District on March 24, 1999. Due to the snow cover at the time of submittal we were not able to identify the noxious weeds within the property boundary nor the appropriate control methods. The following is a report on the noxious weeds present (Exhibit A)and the weed control methods that are currently being employed. _ There were three (3)primary areas of noxious weed infestation within the Bronken Sports.Complex' • (Exhibit A). The most prominent weed observed was bull thistle(Circhan wilgare). Mr.Brian Troth, President,Adam Bronken Sports Complex,Inc.,used a combination of disking,spraying(2-4 D),and/or mowing to treat each problem area of the Complex in early July. Mr.Troth will continue to monitor and manage the Paris in this manner until the weeds have discontinued to seed for the season or have been exterminated. If you have any further questions regarding the status of the weeds within the Adam Bronken Sports Complex,don't hesitate to call me. Thank you for all of your assistance. �Page1 roSUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND Py ,{ REVEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) • Project: Bronken Park within the Valley West Subdivision Projected date for preliminary Plat application: December 1998 CST.IN . Date Plan received December 1998 esr inc. . P.O. Box 6786 13 S.Willson St., Ste. 8 . Bozeman, MT 59771 (406)582-1992 Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the. Board.This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board,this plan must be signed by the chairman of the Board and the person or agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Cooperator: Rick Barber, Managing Member, Valley West, LLC (Print Full Name and/or Name of Company) 3599 Sourdough Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 406-586-0160 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2. Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: • Legal Description: NE 1/4, Sec. 10, T. 2 S.' R. 5 E If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel Pit/Etc: Bronken Park within the Valley West Subdivision 3. Land Use (Please check the appropriate box(s)): (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture X Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain (b) Future Land Use Agriculture ❑ . Residential Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other X Please explain: Recreational Soccer Field and Parking Lot of Bronken Park 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes X No ❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan of and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes X No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes X No ❑ • 7. Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes X No ❑ B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes No SEE Below-X, list which �• species and the approximate size of infestation(s): Bronken Park is approximately 39 acres. To date (2/15/99) 18.5 acres (AC) of'the park have been disturbed during construction of the soccer fields and parking lot; 20.5 AC'will remain undisturbed. Due to current snow cover it is unknown what species of weeds are present within the undisturbed section. The weed management plan for this section will be completed as . weather permits (May-June 1999). (Gallatin County no)dous weeds are listed in section III of Nobous Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/ disturbance of the property. Note: if noxious weeds already exist on the property, please outline these infestations on a map of the area or the subdivision plat None is planned at this time. When weather permits,this will be addressed for the undisturbed 20.5 AC section of Bronken Park 3. Please complete the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. _ (a) Chemical Control: •Chemical Name Rate 'Chemical Name Rate Timing and method of treatment(s): 'Soil Type: 509 B—Enbar Loam; 537 A-Lamoose Silt Loam;448 A- Beaverton-Hyalite Complex'; Ground Water Depth: 3.5 feet 'Weed control work done by- Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: 'Methods of weed control 'Timing of control method(s): 'Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (c) Biological Control: 'Biological control agerit(s) }" Timing of the release(s) of the Bio-control agent(s): Weed control method(s) used to control weed spread while insects establish....................:. 'Weed control work done by- Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor ::• C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS - 1. Are there land(s) already disturbed or that will be disturbed on the property? Yes X No❑ If yes, explain: Within the Bronken Park.area 18.5 AC.have been disturbed. Of that 18.5 AC, topsoil has been removed and subsurface drainage materials have been placed where the parking lot (2.25 AC) and soccer fields (13 AC)will be located. Of the remaining 3.25 AC, 1 AC is part of a wetland mitigation plan and 2.25 AC will remain as open space. 2. If the answer was (YES) to question 1 above,what method(s)will be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas (seeding, planting, sod, etc.) No revegetation will be necessary for the parking lot area (2.25 AC). The soccer fields (13 AC) and open space (2.25 AC)will be seeded as weather permits. The 1 AC wetland mitigation area was sodded and seeded by Wetlands West, Inc. during November, 1998. 3. If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: (For the soccer fields and open space the type and rate are the same.) TYPE: Kentucky Bluegrass PERCENT: 62% RATE:4#/1000 sq. ft. - Park Blue Grass 15% Perennial Rye Grass 15% Creeping Red Fescue 8% l 4. If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used: • Early Summer: TYPE:A Balanced-formula-Fertilizer—16-16-16 (16N itrogen-16Phosporus-16Potassium) RATE: 40#/ 13,000 sq.ft Fall: 16-20-0 Fertilizer 5. Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate cultivation date(s): after May 1. 1999, before June 15. 1999 , 4 Approximate seeding/sod date(s): after May 1. 1999, before June 15, 1999 Approximate fertilizer date(s): July 1, 1999 and September 15, 1999 NOTE: For revegetation recommendations contact the Gallatin County Conservation District(Natural Resource Conservation Service). D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN APPROVED APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS NO APPROVED i (Signature of Weed Boa Chairma /S (Signatur o Cooperator) . (Date) (Date) _ 4 oroa xosnotru rY_ F ol E ;io�.ti S a cILOOOMNO11oJ i e ,y G m ;R �• ;p • a Y a =J c NIP" 0 • y� 8o�s 1 I • I i I MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING r FOR SUBDIVISION PLANNING Ga�atin Count (FINAL PLAT APPROVAL) Weed Control Projected date for Final Plat application District Date MOU received This Memoranda of Understanding exists the Gallatin County Weed Control District, lereafter referred to as "District" an Valley West LLC, Rick Barber, Managing Member (Please Print Full Name) )` 3599 Sourdough Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 406-586-0160 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) iereinafter referred to as "Cooperator", for the purpose of addressing the issues of noxious weeds ind the revegetation of disturbed areas on land(s) within Valley West subdivision (Name of Subdivision) .egal Description mi , Sec. to , T. 2 R. 5 and NEB Sec. 9, T2S, RSE Ender this Memoranda, the Cooperator has been informed of, and has agreed to comply with, the loxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements of the Gallatin County Weed Control )istrict, the Montana County Weed Control Act, and the Gallatin County Weed Control District's loxious Weed Management Plan as it relates to the above named property. While as a landowner, is Cooperator will.comply with the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements on yearly basis as needed. The Cooperator has also submitted to the Gallatin County Weed Control ►Nice a copy of the Subdivision Covenants that complies with the Noxious Weed Management Plan the District and the Montana County Noxious Weed ont of Act. . :oa Chair an Supervisor Cooperator )ate Date O Memo - To: Dennis Hengel, Gallatin County W Supervisor WETLANDS EST. INC. From:: Lynn Bacon,Wetland Specialist '. Date: August 2, 1999 Re: Valley West Subdivision Weed Management Plan Cc:, Bob Lee, Morrison Maiede, Inc.; Rick Barber, Valley West, LLC. The Valley West Subdivision Weed Management and Revegetation Plan(Preliminary Plat Approval) was submitted to you at the Gallatin County Weed Control District on March 24; 1999. Due to the snow cover at the time of submittal we were not able to identify the noxious weeds within the property boundary nor the appropriate control methods. The following is a report on the noxious weeds present within the property(Exhibit A)and the weed control methods that are currently being employed. There were several small areas of noxious weed infestations within the Valley West Subdivision. The most prominent weed on the property is Canada(Circium w vense)and bull thistle(C. vulgare). • There are patches of the infestation along the north end of Cottonwood Road,the north side of T, Babcock Road,and the west side of Ferguson Road. Mr.Rick Barber,Valley West,LLC,mowed a patch along the curb of Cottonwood Road. The remaining work has been contracted to SM E Construction;the treatment will be subcontracted to Mr.Ron McOwen who will be responsible for treating the weeds with Curtail. If you have any further questions regarding the status of the weeds within the Adam Bronken Sports Complex,don't hesitate to call me. Thank you for all of your assistance. Ref:C•Jdients/101tweedmem.doc •Pagel i • SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) ` Proiect:Valley West Subdivision • Projected date for Preliminary Plat Application: December 1998 WETLAnDS Date Plan received December 1998 EST,INC. P.O. Box 6786 /r l 13 S.Willson St., Ste. 8 �, Bozeman,MT 59771 (406)582-'1992 Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board. This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board, this plan must be signed by the.chairman of the Board and the person or agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Cooperator: Rick Barber, Manacling Member, Valley West, LLC (Print Full Name and/or Name of Company) 3599 Sourdough Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 406-586-0160 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) . 2. Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: Legal Description:NW'/<Sec. 10. and NE '/,Sec. 9, T. 2 S. R. 5 E If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel Pit/Etc: Valley West Subdivision 3. Land Use (Please check the appropriate box(s)): (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop X Other ❑ Please explain: The land was historically utilized primarily for grazing. (b) Future Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential X Commercial X Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain:Approximately 95% (171.75 AC) of the total acreage (181.78 AC) will be residential and 5% (9.03 AC)will be commercial. 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? ' Yes X No ❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan of and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes X No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes X No ❑ • 7. Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes X No ❑ B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes No SEE Below • List which species and the approximate size of infestation(s): Valley West Subdivision is approximately 181.78 39 AC. To date (3/1/99) 9 AC have been disturbed during the construction of access roads and 2 AC were disturbed during the realignment of Baxter Ditch. Due to current snow cover it is not known what weed species occur within the undisturbed portion. The weed management plan for the remaining area will be completed as weather permits(May-June, 1999). (Gallatin County noxious weeds are listed In section III of Noxious Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/ disturbance of the property. Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property, please outline these infestations on a map of the area or the subdivision plat None is planned at this time. When weather permits the plan will be completed. 3. Please complete the appropriate section(s) corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Chemical Control: 'Chemical Name Rate •Chemical Name Rate 'Timing and method of treatment(s): "Soil Type: 53 B—Amsterdam Sift Loam; ; 448 A- Beaverton-Hyalite Complex; 457 A—Tumer • Loam; 509 B—Enbar Loam; 510B—Meadowcreek Loam; 537 A- Lamoose Silt Loam Ground Water Depth: 3.5—4.5 feet 'Weed control work done by- Self❑ or Contracted❑ Name of Contractor (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: ' Methods of weed control 'Timing of control method(s): Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (c) Biological Control: Biological control agent(s) Timing of the release(s) of the Bio-control agent(s): Weed control method(s) used to control weed spread while insects establish............................. *Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS 1. Are there land(s)already disturbed or that will be disturbed on the property? Yes X No❑ If yes, explain: Within the Valley West Subdivision 11 AC have been disturbed (9 AC for the access roads and 2 AC for the realignment of Baxter Ditch). 2. If the answer was (YES) to question 1 above, what method(s)will be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas (seeding, planting, sod, etc.) The 2 AC along the Baxter Ditch were seeded a mixture of. timothy, orchardgrass_ , alsike clover, spring wheat, smooth brome, hard fesue, and blue flax. In addition, sod stripped from the stream banks of the realigned waterway was placed along the banks of the stream. The disturbed areas along the roadways will be seeded afa rate of 16#/AC with the following seed mixture. 3. If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: TYPE: Timothy (Phleum pratense) APPROX. %: 25% RATE: 16#/AC (#/16#: 4) Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) 25% 4 Annual Ryegrass 20% 3 Pubescent Wheatgrass (Agropyron trichophorum) 20% 3 Redtop (Agrostis alba) 5% 1 Red Clover(Trifolium pratense) 5% 1 • 4. If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used:' None will be used. 5. Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate seeding: after May 1. 1999, before June 15, 1999 D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN APPROVED APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIO M NOT APPROVED ❑ .. (Signature of Weed Board Cha' a rvis (Signature of Cooperator) 3 (Date)- (Date) I \104eq DURSTON R 0 W . ,��1i_YQ' w n•y ,ice UON N Povtla CO. CW_:( I.VIO v pVi11 (I.OI At) GAw IAID p005TSWRom niACE YfTu�gf (iIa Am I NINN •I •I� +.la W_2 B) I NO!K) pQY.miws PW- urwo �� ' ♦ kl+e0.�-n�� (am Aq YAm,a I '� ' r, Anwt W-2(D) IAuw $ tu.-I-C Ra ,t'{ sE{r� MV C INMt 30 W-CAW- wA Y�.jO.i �NI.T4 AC) u.1,1 (Yl ` w�2C) vtnuros t°�.fav 1 0 J �aS! a ws+• a wH d N ( .� i � ..msRFAVU LEGENDJ� �p —�— PRQIELT BOUNONRY W-] OFicu L PORTIONS Of THE N 1/2 Of bril 1 SECTIONS 0 h 10.T2S.RM.802EWW,Wr. TTInW ERR ION OF BI.B000J( .. . TOTAL AREA.305.8 ACRES '.' .. . ( WERANO BOUNDARY TOTAL AREA- 102.5 ACRES . WERANO GOLMOARY CONTIMIES BUT . WAS Nor DELINEATED ' W-1 WETLAND TYPE DESIGNATION • DATA COLLECTION POW NONIT01"WELL LOCATION(APPRO)WTE) ..^..r.....- PERENNIAL WATERWAY - ImCA M=NA,O"70W aU4'a IOTA K F9f OLVsf . - /OP!Iw)CQIdCY/i K4 alOUI O=IA,t PROPOSED PONDS AND APPURTENANT ONIErS ' -300 0 1 00 200 300 upo/as P1Rp1./•2eati WEM198M COPYRIGHT 1998" �� lEt ; MORRISON ENGINEERS R:�;r � s SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS s NNERS MAIMLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD --P.O.BOY 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 • 406-587-0721 • FA6 6-5587-1fl6 An Employee-Owned Company December 1, 1998 Dennis R. Hengel, Supervisor Gallatin County Weed Control District 203 West Tamarack Bozeman,MT 5971.5 Re: Valley West Subdivision-Environmental Assessment MMI #2 8 85/004/054B/03 10 Dear Dennis: We are in the process of submitting a preliminary plat application for a major subdivision located between Durston Road and and West Babcock Street near Cottonwood Road, in an area recently annexed to the City of Bozeman. According to the NRCS,onsite soil types are as follows: 53B Amsterdam silt loam 448A Hyalite-Beaverton complex 457A Turner loam 509B Enbar loam 510B Meadowcreek loam 537A Lamoose loam 748A Hyalite-Beaverton complex The owners of this property need to establish a Noxious Weed Management and.Revegetation Plan and a Memoranda of Understanding for the site. Please find enclosed a vicinity map to help you locate the boundaries of the property. There are no covenants proposed with this subdivision because it is not intended to create lots for development. Its intent is to create tracts that will be further subdivided in the future. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely yours, Robert Lee, Planner enclosure cc: Rick Barber HA2885\004\WPD\WEEDMGT.WPD Page 1 of 1 Rpvinninv Our Second Half Century 13OZEMAN QUADRANGLE- ts�� - DIO�t'TAhA—GALLATIN CO. ♦e10 •�.,�:, /,s�, 15 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) (,3ELGRADE) 5° '493 5' .411 ter- _ r.,cr:1,:r,a.r•, .497 :161-0G :ft f. 17. ,.'••.16 ! I' �aasi 90\ f'd; }J 1� � '�Q�•`' !• `:r3,CanYon� /��2`j j, :rk{et�Lto ti .-. Y -; _.. � .- r( �at� P,J.;Vie. y .�3- _.r� :.(• /}. . —;loss 21 22 33 e � '°i� vI- i( :f/�;3 '�•� %`:'•? -';::�" •valeYCrnt4: ' •f. "}• '} -L -,:* s+-+-'��•- - --'a�!'.-i.:}�,.*ll.",,,; .tT•✓'♦.; _- _-,�t... >.__._ ..�r' < _} _j �'•-r r,!..�u N-}• _ .�:�•''• -'1``'s; .. ` .. .1• � d v.ant• ��w, � y'9:. _ i- -•.�^•�_�.}s....::i• �.r :.�`-_�-! ,S Story .., r` ^ i�2$' `t#• 2i •✓: ti `ti`•ra: Ye T..... 't-'=:�'i_ w-_-- .1. .....'t - .. >" :.__._-.. V,. !..,�...-��.'_�Fr aa•,�'� A tr;+a.�t....:. •t-L . 3 NO♦in w l'`�iG7.GQ .4ra _ ..�s�, '__ter .•'�\i �•� s S f. •,�• .(� . . r � `•.. .�* Y�..��t._ �� •1 . �•e i"'' ` �� S f n1Rx ?gip.' rZs J S E 9..a 's x C± 34 "arc 30 �• '�.�,�` �►� •. :'•-fit q�+ % .'-'.z-r-.. .ri T_;cFooC •;'ram,?:t•, u,T_.. -': •Canon i ui�' •-•. -'�^' - -- --ram.•.....:._-�sa; :�. .:._=�a�- -�--r;.<xr.-.a... •`.'-. .. ,,.:.:,.- .. 1101 C �: lr ._ _._ T..l:—�.w���:XS ':'�_. 1 J•'. *:v`'t7 PROD2 t �: `.� T s ' SITE -•NOAa_ _ L itt s3-`.v�.r:�'��:.i;�: ,L.°,'tt• :::.:.r .. r0^evl - ;: , �.,j ,.:' ram• 1 >; —. ,e59 go i YIC n : I �. _..as:, t -z.:a.+.:_. _+4.'._.n� �•'a. 1;07_DIM�._._.• '�.;"`•�'�`< , � .. a 9 ...slTe.•:^�ss5:+-t:.•:�.r�.4'..�.:=•..•tr•e�:J L�lz..�r-ti'..:' :S„!`e LY�;. ?► _ .. .;t e I (�^.\ ..'4.. /'•+.^'�. I Y f 12 _•_•�-~_• f.'_' l.�;r'�'j ";" �;a:.L s ` LwZ i t } i .'.f`•-�- �._r:,;.'i•y ■: :,,,�t••et� Ee,u*s1 .! ��•��?'1 P . -�``' r..;,�.. .v'�• ku• � .• '.., :••- ;• k;.. •)'ff.,.•?1- .:,_ .4. }t'•r `-fr_ce:7r- .•old �... •a3> '.:+a:a�.-...�,��':.�irse.�.?'.--....._i•r:•v �'�t•�.i�::_.••��,;'j+ia �. .�--'-. :�� t '• - - ~� c!'.rt T ••STa.'�Gc;!":� 'z: •'t:, �..�'Y a� _- ! ,;`�7• •anf- ' i✓..]:�7 ►- •+.10• -• ;.15 14 %, i.�-:-._._his }!•'�_ 17_ . 4, .. ... .. it-- .'�: ,'a 1'a�• u..� �.k 1.2Ji �':�.i��o• .. ._ 'sew 1 ,I .. 21 . 22 24 . ♦. 'n.., _ ,..... • ••vI 3 ru.irr�'\i�•;� :. rr.:h,..:.•. �" i`. �`�s' s t. q,• C••A_•? s.yT .^. '•i+t%'• y^cy: •V 1 • f ,l':� MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC.4/97kss T2S R5E'SECS:-'9&10 VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION GALLATIN COUNTY: BOZEMAN QUADRANGLE MAP MONTANA SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS NEED MANAGEMENT A\D RE VEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board. This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, .and the Montana County Noxious Need Control Act. Upon approval by the Board, this plan must be signed by the chairman of the Board and the person or agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes--a binding agreement between the Board -and such person or agency. A.) GENERAL Lti'FORINIATION 1.) Name of Cooperator: Gerald Wing c/o Rick Barber 586-0160 (Print Full Name and/or Name of Company) (Telephone) 1240 Bennett Lane, Cali stoda. CA . 94515-9714 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) 2.) Geographic Location to be Coyered by this Plan: Legal Description:NE1/4 Sec 9 & N141/4 Sec. 10_, T. 2 N©, R. 5 OF W If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel pit/etc: _ Valley West Subdivision 3.) Land Use (Please check the appropriate box(s)): (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture [XI Residential [ ] Commercial ( J Pasture non-crop [ J Other [ J Please explain (b).Future Land Use Agriculture [ ] Residential (X J Commercial [ ] Pasture non-crop [ ] Other [ ] Please explain 4.) Is a Nlap of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Ye- No S.) Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed NIanagerrient and Revegetationl Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Ye No • 1 P Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed illanacement Plan of the District? Yes itio 7.) Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections'of the Montana County Noxious IN'ced Control Act? Yes • 23 Wildlife This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Wildlife. As a result of historical agricultural practices, proximity to the city and lack of vegetative cover, there is little wildlife or habitat on site. In the past, the site has been used for pasture and growing of hay crops. The property is currently unutilized. There are no known populations of large mammals that occupy the site. The wetlands enhancements identified in the section entitled Surface Water are expected to improve the waterfowl and fish habitat on the property. There are no known endangered species occupying or utilizing the site. Correspondence with the Montana Department of Fish Wildlife & Parks is included at the end of this section. The letter does not raise concerns regarding the affect of the development on wildlife or habitat. It does state, "in general the development takes admirable steps in protecting waterways and mitigating . wetlands. • 1 -^�q MORRISON ENGINEERS I'.4r, SCIENTISTS ' l`i31 SURVEYORS NNERS ` MMERLE, iNc. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVO-P.O.BOX 1113-BOZEMAN,MT 59771 -406.587.0721 -FAX:4 6-5587-176 • An Employee-Owned Company October 29,2001 Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks Kurt Alt 1400 S. 19''Ave. Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development . Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Alt: . In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to identify any impacts a proposed project may have on fish and wildlife in the area. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal, we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. • Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Plan Application to the City of Bozeman for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project U calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated in the Concept Plan Application. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase #1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. D The majority of the area has been unutilized in the recent past. The property is within the City Limits of Bozeman. All wetland improvements will be in accordance with an individual 404 Permit granted by the Corps of Engineers. We are requesting you:agency provide a review of the proposed project and provide comments that may be incorporated into our submittal. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact me at(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morris o -Maierle,Inc. Greg Stra on,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures Cc: File H:\33 84\003\Cortesp\wi Idl i fe 10-26-O l.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" efogtar,,a ,. . cWNWe va rW 1400 S. 19th Street Bozeman, MT 59718 Carol Schott Planning and Community Development j:•. PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 August 8, 2001 Dear Carol: I reviewed the materials you sent regarding Valley West PUD. Over the course of the last few years I have been involved in a variety of permit reviews related to this project. In general, waterways are well protected with adequate buffers and should provide an amenity to the property while protecting aquatic habitat. While I question the need for, or wisdom of ponds in the development, in general the development takes admirable steps in protecting waterways and mitigating wetlands. Attached are the plans, as requested. Thanks for the chance to participate. S' ely, r.. Patrick Byorth Fisheries Biologist • 24 Historical Features • This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning . Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Historical Features. There are no historic structures on site. According to the records of the Montana Historical Society_ there are no previously recorded sites, historic or archaeological, on the Valley West property. Correspondence from the historical. society specific to the Valley West Planned Unit Development is provided with this section. The letter does indicate the potential to impact unknown or unrecorded cultural properties. However, in review of the property and areas identified for construction, a cultural resource inventory of the area is an unnecessary expense. If any sites of potentially historic or archeological interest are encountered during construction, the Montana Historic Preservation Office will be contacted. • 1 M .w.. MOMSON ENGINEERS l� SCIENTISTS s SURVEYORS PLANNES ^'•'k ''b MMERLE,INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVO •P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 •FAX:406 587-176 . • An Employee-Owned Company October 26, 2001 State Historical Preservation Office Stan Wilmoth P.O.Box 201202 Helena, MT 59620-1202 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Wilmoth: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to identify historic,paleontological,archeological,or cultural sites,structures or objects that may be affected by the proposed project. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. • Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Plan Application to the City of Bozeman for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project ll calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated in the Concept Plan Application. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase #1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. D In addition to an comments you may have on the project, we are requesting our agency provide a Y Y Y P J q gY g Y review of the cultural resource records for this area. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact me at(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morriso -Maier le-Inc. . Greg Stra n,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures Cc: File • H:\3384\003\Corresp\H istorical 10-26-0 l.doc "Providing resources in Partnership with clients to achieve their goals" • '-'FC'0 - 1 "2001 MONTANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 225 North Roberts c. P.O. Box 201201 o Helena, MT 59620-1201 d (406) 444-2694 o FAX(406) 444-2696 o. w%vw.montanahistoricalsociery.org o. • October 30, 2001 Greg Stratton Morrison Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Blvd PO Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: VALLEY WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BOZEMAN. SHPO Project#: 2001103007 Dear Mr. Stratton: I have conducted a cultural resource file search for the above-cited project located in Section 10,T2S, R5E. According to our records there have been no previously recorded historic or archaeological sites within the designated search locale. The absence of cultural properties in the area does not mean that they do not exist but rather may reflect the lack of any previous cultural resource inventory in the area, as our records indicated only three. I have enclosed a list of these three reports,which contains basic bibliographic • information such as author,title, and date completed. If you would like any further information regarding these reports you may contact me at the number listed below. A review of these reports would indicate that they did not cover the current project area. Given this lack of previous inventory and the ground disturbance proposed by this undertaking,we feel that this project has the potential to impact unknown or unrecorded cultural properties. We,therefore, recommend that a cultural resource inventory be conducted prior to initiation in order to determine if such sites are present and if they will be impacted. Thank you for consulting with us. If you have any further questions or comments you may contact me at(406)-444-7767 or by e-mail at dmurdo n,state.mt.us. Sincerely, Damon Murdo Cultural Records Manager Enclosures: File: LOCAL/SUBDIVISION/2001 STATT17S1 TORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE o. 1410 81'Ave o. P.O.Box 201202 a.Helena,MT 59620-1202 a (406) 5 c. FAX(406)444-6575 ..WE- IT e_ t .;r r �q�a c"x ' t �rsn...xa - �..1 �•r`c+' f�i�,�- `'&+ '.�r,�o_ Fa,W�' �01��.s• a, ,�i:•`.�Iy-.'ry3z^,,yi; ._ ' fit-: ?'`` .iC�..,.T ..��".• ''�3 f :: "a -r�'`i'Fs'°3: ok`f3Culfural RespufeiliQgr ` • ��'�. �x` `����.���.� � ► S�See' on�teport � � -,`� .s�-.�. [W'R-N;2� ?, 7 -y r-.�.�D:y{1'.�.C�'•t'�i•V3i 1 ..i[i�`3e��7�� lq i M Y;_.f 44.r�Ti J.. Townshi : 023 an AXLINE JON A. a/ a/ ioai BYRON PLUM HOMESTEAD -- ADENDUM TO BOZEMAN-WEST INVENTORY CRABS Document Number: GA .4 12829 Agency Document No: F 50-2 (4) 82 Township' : 02S Range- LAHREN LARRY A. s� 6�2000 FLUIDYNE - FERGUSON AVENUE SUB-DIVISION-GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA(W 112 HE 114SECTXON 10, T2S, R5E CRABS Document Number: GA 6 22877 Agency Document No: _Township: 02S Range: 05S GREISER T. WEBER, ET AL. o0.0_ RESULTS OF A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY FOR THE TOUCH AMERICA/AT & T FIBER OPTIC CABLE ROUTE BETWEEN BILLINGS AND LOOKOUT PASS IN MONTANA CRABS Document Number: ZZ 1 23275 Agency Document No: • r • Visual Impact This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Visual Impact. The original Valley West Subdivision is approved for medium density residential use. This subdivision will be an- extension of the residential development occurring in Bozeman's northwest quadrant. The traditional neighborhood setting will create a visually appealing development in which to live. Various components of the development, including a landscaped trail system, parks, natural wetland corridors, small lakes, and other recreational areas work to mitigate its visual impact. A summary of some of the visual as well as recreational amenities to the subdivision is provided below. The Maynard-Border stream-ditch corridor running between Babcock Street and Durston Road provides a pedestrian trail through a natural setting which includes the recently enhanced Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch, and a small lake to be constructed north of Cascade St. The Baxter Creek corridor running from West Babcock Street to Durston Road, and incorporating Baxter Creek to be enhanced through the wetland mitigation plan, the Baxter Creek Trail, Bronken Memorial Park, and a wetland complex to be constructed directly west of the park. Landscaped parkways along Cottonwood Road, Durston Road, Babcock Street, and Ferguson Avenue provide pedestrian corridors connecting the many amenities of the development. All utilities will be placed underground within the street right-of-way and dedicated utility easements. The construction contract will insure revegetation of all disturbed areas and storm water detention areas. Driveways for residential units will access streets interior to the development. The Valley West Subdivision is in an area that has been master planned and zoned for residential development for more than 20 years. The PUD's visual impact will be within the range expected by the master plan and zoning designation. • 1 • zs • � s DESIGN REPORT FOR THE WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS IN VALLEY WEST MASTER PLAN AREA BOZEMAN, MONTANA • Prepared By: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Boulevard P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1113 Engineers: Greg J. Stratton, P.E. James A. Ullman, P.E. Date: November 13, 2001 File: 3384.003/040/0310 • VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 1 VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary.................................................................................... Page 4 2.0 Introduction ............:.................................................................................... Page 4 3.0 Pre-Analysis.......:........................................................................................ Page 5 4.0 Predicted Average Daily Water Demand ..................................................... Page 5 5.0 Peak Demand Factors ................................................................................ Page'6 6.0 Pressure Zones........................................................................................... Page 7 7.0 Modeling Procedures.................................................................................. Page 7 8.0 Model Results ............................................................................................. Page 8 9.0 Conclusion .................................................................................................. Page 8 LIST OF TABLES • Table #4.1 — Service Area and Average Daily Demand ....................................... Page 5 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Existing and Proposed Water Facilities for Valley West Subdivision 2. Valley West WaterCAD Model Diagram LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Calculated Pump Curves for associated pressure vs. flow fire hydrants B. WaterCAD Model Results version 4.5 (a.k.a. Cybernet). VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS • DESIGN REPORT Page 2 LIST OF REFERENCES Water Facility Plan Bozeman, Montana - May 1997 - pp 18-20, 87. Valley West Annexation Water Main Extension Design report.. June1998 Metcalf and Eddy 3rd Edition Wastewater Engineering, Table 2-5 pp 20 Community Water Systems Source Book 5t' Edition, Table IV pp 10 Draft City of Bozeman, Design Standards and Specifications Policy May 2001 - page 36 B-2 Zoning, City of Bozeman Preliminary Study, "Trunk Sewer Main Extension Along Baxter Lane From Simmental Drive to Just West of North 7t' Avenue." • VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 3 VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSION • DESIGN REPORT This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, Section 16.18.050 relative to Water Supply. 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of the following discussion is to provide a basis for design and review of the proposed Valley West Master Planned area water distribution network. Aspen Enterprises LLC. is proposing to develop approximately 310 acres,consisting of 10 residential phases to create as many as 1436 dwelling units and three neighborhood commercial phases along with parks and open space areas. This project is located in the 406-acre Valley West Annexation,which is located west of Ferguson Avenue and south of Durston Road. As part the Valley West annexation process the City of Bozeman's water system was extended into the project area, from connections near the intersection of Durston Road and Flathead Street and near the intersection of West Babcock Street and Ferguson Avenue. This water system extension consisted of approximately 11,000 feet of looped 12-inch ductile iron pipe with two. pressure- , reducing valves. Spring Creek Village Resort also extended the City of Bozeman's water system just south of the Valley West Annexation. Spring Creek Village Resort included approximately 2,900 lineal feet of 12-inch water main and 2,600 lineal feet of 8-inch water main. The Spring Creek Village Resort extension also provided an additional water main loop by connecting to the existing water system at the intersection of Ferguson Avenue and Fallon Street. The Existing facilities are illustrated on Figure 1 entitled Valley West Subdivision Existing and Proposed Water Facilities. Aspen Enterprises', Valley West project will extend the City of Bozeman's water system throughout the project and in Durston Road to.provide service within the western portions the project. 2.0 Introduction Water for domestic use and fire protection will be provided by connection to and extension of the City of Bozeman water system. Connection to the existing water system will occur at several locations along the water main extensions completed VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS • DESIGN REPORT Page 4 • for the Valley West Annexation. The locations in which the connections will occur are on West Babcock Street, Cottonwood Road and Durston Road. An extension.of the 12-inch main in Durston Road west of Cottonwood Road will provide water and fire service for the western most phases of the project. The remaining phased water main extensions for the interior portion of the project will be 8-inch and tapped off of the existing 12-inch mains located in the above-mentioned streets. The Valley West Annexation water main extension divides the project into two pressure zones as indicated in the Water Facility Plan by installing two pressure- reducing valves in locations of high pressure. The water main extensions for the Valley West Master Plan utilize looped systems in both pressure zone areas. This design report is to indicate that there is adequate volume and pressure to supply domestic and fire service for the Valley West project by utilizing a hydraulic analysis. The hydraulic analysis is a model of the service area utilizing existing and proposed information in a software program called WaterCAD (a.k.a. Cybernet). 3.0 Pre-Analysis Before the analysis can begin, foundational data is acquired regarding variables such as average daily water demand, required fire flows, boundary pressures and/or • tank locations, pipe materials, elevations and relative location of all other appurtenant components. Once the information is determined or calculated it is inserted to the software's database to create a model of the water system. The next few sections explain the method for determining and or calculating the data required to model the water system for Valley West Subdivision. Each node, pipe and or pump included in the model has to include the characteristics of the water system installed. After each piece of the model is complete the hydraulic analysis can be run. 4.0 Predicted Average Daily Water Demand Water demand predicted in this report is based on findings detailed in the Bozeman 1997, Water Facility Plan, page 20. The plan suggests that an overall annual average daily demand of 200 gpd per person should be used for all future development. This demand estimate includes: 1) Base Flow Water. • VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 5 • • 2) Increased summer usage including lawn and garden irrigation, non- • commercial car washing, cleaning sidewalks, and other miscellaneous metered uses. 3). Unaccounted for water. usage such as street cleaning, hydrant flushing, sewer flushing, fire flows, flat rate accounts, leakage, and under registering meters. (See Water Facility Plan, pp. 18). The following table indicates the service area utilized and the Average Daily Water Demand for this hydraulic analysis. (See Table 4.1) Table 4.1 Service Area and Average Daily Demand Service Area Area Population' Avg Daily Demand (acres) (persons) GPD GPM Valley West Subdivision(ten phases) 300 3593 718600 499 Valley West Subdivision neighborhood commercial 9 42523 30 Bronken Park(8 gpd/Visitor)3 39 12000 8 Private ownership property 4 110 22000 15 • Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision 20 259 51870 36 R&D Holding 20 266 53200 37 Spring Creek Village Resort 141 1873 374528 260 Christian Heritage School(25 gpd/person)4 Students-98 131 Staff- 8 2650 2 Total 545 12773711 887 1-based on 13.3 persons/acre, Bozeman May, 1997 Water Facility Plan p. 87 NOTE: (Valley West Subdivision population is determined by proposed zone use) 2-based on 200 gpd/person, Bozeman November, 1997 Water Facility Plan p. 20 3-based on Metcalf and Eddy Td Edition,Wastewater Engineering Table 2.5 4-based on "Community Water Systems"Source Book Vh Edition,Table 1V, p.10 5.0 Peak Demand Factors For planning purposes the Maximum Daily Demand Factor used will be 2.5 and the Peak Hourly Demand Factor used will be 3.0.. VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS • DESIGN REPORT Page 6 • These peaking factors were taken from Draft City of Bozeman, Design Standards and Specifications Policy May 2001 — Section V. Utility Design Criteria, sub-section A. Water Distribution Lines Design Criteria, Paragraph 4, page 36 6.0 Pressure Zones The installation of the Valley West water main project divided the water service area into two pressure zones. The pressure zones were created by the placement of a pressure-reducing valve on Durston Road west of Ferguson Avenue, and a pressure-reducing valve on Cottonwood Road north of the intersection with West Babcock Street. The downstream pressure setting for each pressure-reducing valve is 65-psi and 54-psi respectfully. Areas lying north of West Babcock Street are in the low-pressure zone except for that area east of Maynard Ditch,which is in the high-pressure zone. Also the areas lying south of West Babcock Street are in the high-pressure zone. 7.0 Modeling Procedure The proposed water distribution system for Valley West and the associated areas was modeled using WaterCAD version 4.5 (a.k.a. Cybernet) and the information • detailed in this report. The total water demand .for the system includes the Maximum Daily Demand and the required fire flow of 1500 gpm. The Maximum Daily Demand is calculated by multiplying the Average Daily Demand by a peaking factor of 2.5 as described above. Information from three area fire hydrants was used as connections to the existing City of Bozeman water system for the modeling of the area water distribution system. The static, residual and pitot pressures for the fire hydrants located at the intersections of Durston Road and Ferguson Avenue, West Babcock Street and Ferguson Avenue, and Valley Commons and Ferguson Avenue were obtained from the City of Bozeman Water Department. This information was used to develop a relationship between residual pressure and flow as simulated in the model by a pump and a reservoir. (See the associated pump curves calculated for each of the fire hydrants located in the appendix at the end of this report) The minimum pressure used for pipe main sizing was 35-psi during normal uses and no less than 20-psi residual pressure during fire hydrant full flow condition at any supply node • VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 7 8.0 Model Results • The model's results indicate that 8-inch distribution mains for the Valley West Subdivision will supply the needed maximum daily flow with fire flow while maintaining the required 20-psi residual pressure at all points within the modeled area. (See the WaterCAD model flow.results located in the appendix at the end of this report). 9.0 Conclusion During the Max Day-Fire Flow modeling process there were six nodes that failed to converge. To determine if the design criteria was met for each of these nodes a manual demand of 1500 gpm was placed individually on each node. Placing the 1500 gpm demand on each node individually and re-running the hydraulic analysis each time simulated fire flow at that node. The results from the hydraulic analysis indicate that the design criteria were met at each node. By utilizing the existing Valley West Annexation water mains and the Spring Creek Village Resort water mains then infilling the proposed Valley West subdivision with 8-inch mains the area water distribution system meets the necessary design criteria. H:\3384\003\DOCS\DZNRPTW.DOC • VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS • DESIGN REPORT Page 8 PROPOSED WATER EXISTING WATER MAIN MAIN DURSTON ROAD DURSTDN ROAD DURSTON ROAD (10" MAm MAK7RARf GvgiePSW /: : T ► .x, $07 FIELDS '\� - - c 1 � � }e.P :i ri LEGEND: ExisnNG WATER SYSTEM gqc z k FIGURE 1 LOW PRESSURE AREA - �MORRISON VALLEY WEST SUB. � �"Y„�,' MAIERLE�,INc. EXISTING&PROPOSED T+s^ HIGH PRESSURE AREA _ PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM 150 300 00 ;IJLN WATER FACILITIES Wµ„ CLIENT:A5VLN SCALE:V=300 FIELD WORK•- DATE:11/05/01 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 (This Drevring Has Been Reduced) ORAYM BY: KSS SCALE:V-100' ORAVANG NAME:":\�\ee�\KaD\waia\wm-PMAS[.0"q CHECKED BY-.i PROJ/:3381.003 SHEET --!—OF 1 I i i J-5] P60 DURSTON ROAD tJ-a3d3 DURSTON 1]IROAD 12 PRV-lPm-6 J-5 PS J-IP--9a. P-3]}5 PS J- I—I P-34 J-56 P-59 JT 5 P J-71 -]x n J-x J-165 J-164 d . J-1 Pi P!P-I P320 -3 P-32 PT9e � CONNECTION TO EXISTING SYSTEM n J-2oo d MODELED AS A PUMP WITH A 1 RESERVIOR AS A WATER SUPPLY. 23 PUMP CURVE CALCULATED BY FIRE FLOW FROM HYDRANT LOCATED AT i J- J,216 J-161 1 THE CORNER OF DURSTON ROAD "163 Ply] p_ P_29a m }1a J-112 AND FERGUSON AVENUE. n J-154 }29n n n}1]6 - J-134 P-269 J-2o2 133 P35) J289 J-1 —12 n J-222 -123 1'" J-2I8 25B -119 m J-75 }136 J J-203 J-168 }146 J-204 - ] -13 J-195 '~' 1 194 Y J-111'6 J-95 I80 2 J-221 J-l5/ 20 -I 8 J-219 -l5 P-2>p P-271 P- P-272 F-2]31--234 P233 85 1 1-3 P112 P-234 P-302 P-303 p_y 0.>86 e - P-306 P30) P-30I J-2 P-305 n 1 a' t206 P-2]] o}169P-2]B J-20] P133 e }92 �019 J24 P- 2 J-1B4 n}]8 P95 B6 J- P 751 - 1, P249 '� yl J-93 Pp } }ll8 n}20B 9 P-282 P-283 n« }2P6�28 J9 J-I]0 P2 �3 P-1)6 - P J18P3-231 J-98 J-144 P-243 P23 J-210 dP� }tlB800 P94 7 196 8 }21l }391 na }I42 N}-�1] }11�Ji9u�J P23) }]0 �P-03Pn J-8490 PPo6} Y IB}P9]2 72 g JJJ--1I]]B 2 P-229 I2 P-288 P182 92JP P-2 nn JJ--8B32 P-92 }daPs-a9 3 J-45 21I J-039 }P636 J_P P 2 P3P20 }39 P91 3 RQ - P-2922 P293 }l9 P-4> }9-4P-46 P-)6 P]5 }12 p-44J-41 J-38 d t36 WEST BABCOCK STREET J-37 CONNECTION TO EXISTING SYSTEM MODELED AS A PUMP WITH A 1, RESERVIOR AS A WATER SUPPLY. PUMP CURVE CALCULATED BY FIRE -qq FLOW FROM HYDRANT LOCATED AT d n THE CORNER OF WEST BABCOCK Oa, STREET AND FERGUSON AVENUE. A .0 J-2xs - z R 0 -F on 1 J-23 n J-6817. P->0 J-66 az Jn FALLON STREET J-65 ,I }226 I.i }� I J-63 J-22) J-62 PMP-3 1322 R-1 I P-319 P-318 FALLON STREET CONNECTION TO EXISTING SYSTEM GRAPHIC SCALE MODELED AS A PUMP WITH A RESERVIOR AS A WATER SUPPLY. °-24 + PUMP CURVE CALCULATED BY FIRE (IN FEET) }23 }z4 1 inch= 3aa It FLOW FROM HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF FALLON STREET AND FERGUSON AVENUE. MORRISON FIGURE 2 J-69 dZ-J MAIERLE,txc. VALLEY WEST M�%M-WM6 Lb�1aq WATERCAD MODEL CLIENT:ASPEN ENTERPRISES LLC FIELD WORK• DATE:11/13/01 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/20/2002 DRAWN BY: JAU SCALE:1"=300' DRAWING NAME: H:\3W4\CD3\Ac \W.t \Cyb..&\aycnc9tl.d.g CHECKED BY:GJS PROJ#:3384.003 SHEET 1 OF 1 APPENDIX HYDRANT Q VS P RELATIONSHIP • 12-Oct-2001 Pito Pressure(psi)_ Static Pressure(psi)_ • Residual Pressure(psi)= Hydrant Flow(Qf)= 1502.96 (gpm) Pressure Drop Measured During Test(ho= 50 (static pressure-test flow residual) Outlet Diameter(d)= (n) hr=Pressure Drop to the Desired Residual Pressure(ht)=static pressure-required residual Or=Flow available at the desired residual pressure Req.Residual(psi) Head R hr(psi) Or m 0.00 0.00 150.00 2720.14 10.00 23.10 140.00 2620.67 20.00 46.20 130.00 2517.86 30.00 69.30 120.00 2411.35 40.00 92.40 110.00 2300.67 50.00 115.50 100.00 2185.26 60.00 138.60 90.00 2064.40 70.00 161.70 80.00 1937.19 80.00 184.80 70.00 180Z42 90.00 207.90 60.00 1658.46 100.00 231.00 50.00 1502.96 110.00 254.10 40.00 1332.34 120.00 277.20 30.00 1140.64 130.00 300.30 20.00 916.34 140.00 323.40 10.00 630.24 145.00 334.95 5.00 433.46 Hydrant Flow Capacity Durston Rd. & Ferguson Ave. 160 • Q 140 � 120 - rn - - 100 -- --- _ 80 t-- 60 1 I I i _ 40 - - i 20 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Flow(gpm) HYDRANT Q VS P RELATIONSHIP • 12-Oct-2001 Pito Pressure(psi)= Static Pressure Residual Pressure Hydrant Flow(Of)= 1455.23 (gpm) • Pressure Drop Measured During Test(hf)= 40 (static pressure-test flow residual) Outlet Diameter(d)= (n) hr=Pressure Drop to the Desired Residual Pressure(hi)=static pressure-required residual Or=Flow available at the desired residual pressure Req.Residual(psi) Head ft hr si Qr m 0.00 0.00 140.00 2862.39 10.00 23.10 130.00 2750.10 20.00 46.20 120.00 2633.77 30.00 69.30 110.00 2512.88 40.00 92.40 100.00 2386.82 50.00 115.50 90.00 2254.81 60.00 138.60 80.00 2115.87 70.00 161.70 70.00 1968.67 80.00 184.80 60.00 1811.43 90.00 207.90 50.00 1641.59 100.00 231.00 40.00 1455.23 110.00 254.10 30.00 1245.85 120.00 277.20 20.00 1000.87 130.00 300.30 10.00 688.37 140.00 323.46 0.00 0.00 Hydrant Flow Capacity West Babcock & Ferguson Ave. 140 Q120.- 1 N 100 - i -- rn - �' 80CU - a 60 - U) i 0 40 - Cr_ 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Flow(gpm) • HYDRANT Q VS P RELATIONSHIP • 12-Oct-2001 Pito Pressure(psi)_ ,. Static Pressure Residual Pressure • Hydrant Flow(00= 1637.81 (gpm) Pressure Drop Measured During Test(ho= 35 (static pressure-test flow residual) Outlet Diameter(d)_ (n) hr=Pressure Drop to the Desired Residual Pressure(ho=static pressure-required residual Qr=Flow available at the desired residual pressure Req.Residual(psi) Head ft hr(psi) Or m 0.00 0.00 115.00 3113.46 10.00 23.10 105.00 2964.21 20.00 46.20 95.00 2808.26 30.00 69.30 85.00 2644.56 40.00 92.40 75.00 2471.72 50.00 115.50 65.00 2257.91 60.00 138.60 55.00 2090.56 70.00 161.70 45.00 1875.86. 80.00 184.80 35.00 1637.81 90.00 207.90 25.00 1365.70 100.00 231.00 15.00 1036.47 110.00 254.10 5.00 572.68 115.00 265.65 0.00 0.00 Hydrant Flow Capacity Valley Commons & Ferguson Ave. 120 I ! • a 100 i a� ! 80 -; CO I j :75� a� 40 ! � I Q 20 I i I a� 0 . 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Flow(gpm) • • Calculation Results Su ry Scenario:Average Day (Analysis Started] Tue Nov 13 11:39:57 2001 • (Steady State] (WARNING 0:00:00)Pump'PMP-3'closed because cannot deliver head. 0:00:00 Balanced after 7 trials; relative flow change=0.000122 Trial 1: relative flow change=2.655006 PRV'PRV-1"switched from open to active PRV'PRV-2"switched from open to closed Trial 2: relative flow change 0.601582 Pump'PMP-3'switched from open to closed Trial 3: relative flow change=0.962549 Trial 4: relative flow change=0.135222 Trial 5: relative flow change=0.019435 Trial 6: relative flow change=0.001858 Trial 7: relative flow change=0.006122 Flow Summary Flow Supplied 887.28 gpm Flow Demanded 887.22 gpm Flow Stored 0.00 gpm 0:00:00 Reservoir'R-1"is closed 0:00:00 Reservoir'R-2"is emptying 0:00:00 Reservoir'R-3"is emptying 0:00:00 Pump"PMP-3"closed because cannot deliver head 0:00:00 PRV'PRV.1'active 0:00:00 PRV'PRV-2"closed (Analysis Ended] Tue Nov 13 11:39:57 2001 • Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer.Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\aced\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:40:25 AM ®Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Scenario:orage Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure N (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-1 4.755.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.32 145.94 J-2 4.755.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.28 145.93 J-3 4.753.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.10 146.49 J-4 4.753.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.00 146.67 J-5 4.752.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.86 147.04 J-7 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.72 66.29 J-8 4,746.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.63 67.12 J-9 4,746.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.63 67.12 J-10 4,749.50 Zone-2 Demand 0100 Fixed 0.00 4,901.62 65.81 J-11 4,751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.61 65.16 J-12 4.751.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.61 64.99 J-13 4.758.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.60 62.00 J-14 4,762.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 60.18 J-15 4,765.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 58.88 J-16 4.766.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed .0.00 4,901.59 58.49 J-17 4,770.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 56.71 J-18 4.776.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.59 54.34 J-19 4,776.50 Zone-1 Demand .0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.50 136.28 J-20 4.788.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.31 131.01 J-21 4,794.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.29 128.63 J-22 4.794.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.29 128.63 J-23 4,807.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.29 123.00 J-24 4,807.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.29 123.00 J-25 4,788.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.31 131.01 J-26 4.765.50 Zone-2 Demand. 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 58.88 J-27 4.751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.61 65.16 • J-28 4,751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.61 65.16 J-29 4.751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.61 65.16 J-30 4.746.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.63 67.12 J-31 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.70 66.28 J-32 4,749.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.79 65.89 J-33 4.752.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.94 64.65 J-34 4,752.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.94 64.65 J-35 4,753.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.10 146.49 J-36 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.32 133.96 J-37 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.27 133.93 J-38 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.001 5,092.221 133.91 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerie,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:47:58 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury.CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • Scenarl.verage Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Repol t Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (9pm) (ft) J-39 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.06 133.93 J-40 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.81 134.26 J-41 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 . 5.091.75 134.23 J-42 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.71 134.21 J-43 4,777.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.57 135.71 J-44 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.55 134.14 J-45 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.32 133.96 J-46 4,777.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.13 136.34 J-47 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.22 133.91 J-48 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.75 134.23 J-49 4.779.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.55 135.23 J-50 4,741.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 69.18 J-51 4,740.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.56 69.68 J-52 4,738.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.53 70.54 J-53 4,738.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.48 70.51 J-54 4,738.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 70.73 J-55 4,736.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 71.24 J-56 4,734.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.46 72.15 J-57 4,734.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.46 72.2; J-58 4.741.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 69.18 J-59 4,740.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.56 69.68 J-60 4,738.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.48 70.51 J-61 4,736.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 71.24 J-62 4.810.29 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.090.87 121.39 J-63 4,809.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,090.90 121.75 • J-64 4,809.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.090.93 121.89 J-65 4.802.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.07 125.07 J-66 4,800.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.13 .125.70 J-67 4,797.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.22 126.90 J-68 4,794.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.30 128.63 J-69 4,817.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.22 118.64 J-70 4,781.50 Zane-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.63 134.18 J-71 4,750.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.86 147.60 J-72 4,751.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.86 147.34 J-73 4,754.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.86 146.13 J-74 4,759.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.86 143.62 J-75 1 4,759.90 Zone-1 IDemand 0.00 1Fixed 0.00 5.091.86 143.62 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:Q384%003%acad\waterlcybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:47:58 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 7 • Scenariserage Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-76 4.763.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.86 141.98 J-77 4.764.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.87 141.85 J-78 4,768.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 140.00 J-79 4.770.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 139.18 J-80 4,771.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.90 138.80 J-81 4,774.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.95 137.35 J-82 4.776.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.99 136.46 J-83 4.781.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.04 134.57 J-84 4,777.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,092.09 136.32 • J-85 4.773.22 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.90 137.88 J-86 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 139.78 J-87 4,764.40 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.87 141.68 J-88 4.758.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.86 144.18 J-89 4,780.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.83 134.83 J-90 4.774.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 137.27 J-91 4.772.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 138.01 J-92 4.770.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 139.00 J-93 4.768.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 140.04 J-94 4.768.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 140.04 J-95 4.766.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.87 140.90 J-97 4.775.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.92 136.77 J-98 4.772.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.89 138.31 J-99 4,769.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.88 139.65 J-100 4,766.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.87 140.86 J-101 4.780.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.68 134.50 J-102 4,774.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.65 137.09 • J-103 4,772.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.65 138.21 J-104 4.777.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.58 135.72 J-105 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.59 138.14 J-106 4.770.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.59 138.92 J-107 4.778.50 Zone-1 Demand. 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.63 135.48 J-108 4.773.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.091.63 137.64 J-109 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.60 138.15 J-110 4.772.30 Zone-1 Demand 6.25 Fixed 6.25 5.091.59 138.14 J-111 4.750.50 Zone4 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.68 65.41 J-112 4.750.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.67 65.41 J-113 4,754.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.631 63.57 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project.Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Ma ierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4,5015c) 11/13/01 11:47:58 AM P Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 7 • Scenaroverage Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-114 4,754.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.63 63.48 J-115 4,760.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 .Fixed 0.00 4,901.61 61.01 J-116 4.760.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.60 60.92 J-117 4,763.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.60 59.75 J-118 4,766.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 58.28 J-119 4,767.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.59 57.89 J-120 4,772.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 55.98 J-121 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.63 66.25 J-122 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.63 66.25 J-123 4,754.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.62 63.65 J-124 4,754.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.62 63.48 J-125 4,760.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.60 61.26 J-126 4,763.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 59.70 J-127 4,764.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 59.44 J-128 4,768.14 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 57.74 J-129 4,770.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 56.72 J-130 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.60 60.01 J-131 4.768.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 57.63 J-132 4,759.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.60 61.39 J-133 4,750.65 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.59 65.30 J-134 4,748.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.57 66.27 J-135 4,751.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 65.01 J-136 4,753.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 64.19 J-137 4,755.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 63.15 J-138 4,762.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 60.30 J-139 4,762.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 60.17 J-140 4,768.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 57.44 J-141 4,772.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 55.84 J-142 4,773.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 55.32 J-143 4,769.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.57 57.05 J-144 4,766.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.57 58.65 J-145 4,760.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 61.07 J-146 4,756.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 62.67 J-147 4,758.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 62.02 J-148 4,755.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.56 63.11 J-149 4.762.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 60.16 J-150 1 4,763.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 1 Fixed 0.00 4.901.56 59.78 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrlson-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:47:58 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 7 • Scenarloerage Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-151 4,768.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 57.70 J-152 4,770.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.58 56.54 J-153 4.735.48 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.46 71.81 J-154 4,739.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.45 70.20 J-155 4,744.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.45 67.90 J-156 4,746.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.45 66.95 J-157 4.749.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.45 65.79 J-158 4,757.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.46 62.46 J-159 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 .4,901.46 65.22 J-160 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.46 67.17 J-161 4.741.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 69.17 J-162 4,740.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,961.47 69.51 J-163 4.742.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 69.00 J-164 4.738.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.52 70.40 J-165 4,738.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 70.60 J-166 4.741.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.47 69.30 J-167 4.752.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.46 64.45 J-168 4,756.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 62.76 J-169 4,760.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.901.56 61.20 J-170 4.765.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 58.87 J-171 4,769.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,901.56 57.14 J-172 4.782.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,091.93 134.09 J-173 4,782.00 Zone-1 Demand 22.64 Fixed 22.64 5,091.93 134.09 J-174 4.752.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.84 Fixed 1.84 4.902.08 64.80 J-175 4,752.70 Zone-1 Demand 17.36 Fixed 17.36 5,091.86 146.74 J-176 4,757.20 Zone-1 Demand 19.17 Fixed 19.17 5,091.85 144.79 • J-177 4,761.80 Zone-1 Demand 15.48 Fixed 15.48 5.091.86 142.80 J-178 4.766.20 Zone-1 Demand 6.25 Fixed 6.25 5,091.87 140.90 J-179 4.770.50 Zone-1 Demand 6.25 Fixed 6.25 5,091.89 139.05 J-180 4.773.40 Zone-1 Demand 6.25 Fixed 6.25 5,091.93 137.81 J-181 4,778.80 Zone-1 Demand 8.75 Fixed 8.75 5,092.02 135.51 J-182 4,776.00 Zone-1 Demand 6.94 Fixed 6.94 5.091.94 136.69 J-183 4,771.80 Zone-1 Demand 13.88 Fixed 13.88 5,091.89 138.49 J-184 4.768:80 Zone-1 Demand 12.15 Fixed 12.15 5,091.88 139.78 J-185 4.765.10 Zone-1 Demand 13.75 Fixed 13.75 5,091.87 141.38 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 5.90 Fixed 5.90 5,091.62 135.47 J-187 1 4.775.10 Zone-1 IDemand 1 17.09.1 Fixed 17.09 5.091.58 136.93 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:47:58 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 7 • Scena•Average Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone. Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 14.93 Fixed 14.93 5.091.61 137.89 J-189 4.768.40 Zone-2 Demand 19.17 Fixed 19.17 4,901.59 57.62 J-190 4,766.80 Zone-2 Demand 3.47 Fixed 3.47 4,901.59 58.32 J-191 4,766.20 Zone-2 Demand 2.78 Fixed 2.78 4,901.59 58.58 J-192 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 12.15 Fixed 12.15 4,901.59 60.01 J-193 4,761.80 Zone-2 Demand 2.78 Fixed 2.78 4,901.60 60.48 J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 10.77 Fixed 10.77 4,901.60 61.18 J-195 4,758.60 Zone-2 Demand 3.47 Fixed 3.47 4,901.60 61.87 J-196 4.757.30 Zone-2 Demand 6.25 Fixed 6.25 4,901.61 62.44 J-197 4,754.60 Zone-2 Demand 11.81 Fixed 11.81 4,901.62 63.61 J-198 4.754.85 Zone-2 Demand 12.50 Fixed 12.50 4,901.60 63.49 J-199 4,749.50 Zone-2 Demand 6.94 Fixed 6.94 4,901.67 65.84 J-200 4,750.00 Zone-2 Demand 17.36 Fixed 17.36 4,901.73 65.65 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 15.28 Fixed 15.28 4,901.67 66.70 J-202 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 15.51 Fixed 15.51 4,901.58 65.28 J-203 4.754.90 Zone-2 Demand 12.39 Fixed 12.39 4,901.56 63.45 J-204 4,757.80 Zone-2 Demand 9.49 Fixed 9.49 4,901.56 62.20 J-205 4,758.40 Zone-2 Demand 2.31 Fixed 2.31 4,901.56 61.94 J-206 4,758.00 Zone-2 Demand 12.15 Fixed 12.15 4,901.56 62.11 J-207 4,762.00 Zone-2 Demand 5.78 Fixed 5.78 4,901.56 60.38 J-208 4,763.20 Zone-2 Demand 2.78 Fixed 2.78 4,901.56 59.86 J-209 4,763.40 Zone-2 Demand 16.32 Fixed 16.32 4,901.56 59.78 J-210 4,767.90 Zone-2 Demand 2.78 Fixed 2.78 4,901.57 57.83 J-211 4,768.90 Zone-2 Demand 17.01 Fixed 17.01 4,901.56 57.40 J-212 4,770.90 Zone-2 Demand 3.47 Fixed 3.47 4,901.58 56.54 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 8.44 Fixed 8.44 4,901.56 56.19 J-214 4,773.50 Zone-2 Demand 8.33 Fixed 8.33 4,901.56 55.41 J-215 4.740.40 Zone-2 Demand 8.34 Fixed 8.34 4,901.49 69.70 J-216 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 8.34 Fixed 8.34 4,901.47 69.34 J-217 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 19.45 Fixed 19.45 4,901.46 67.17 J-218 4.746.20 Zone-2 Demand 5.56 Fixed 5.56 4,901.46 67.17 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 7.64 Fixed 7.64 4,901.46 65.22 J-220 4,750.30 Zone-2 Demand 7.99 Fixed 7.99 4,901.45 65.40 J-221 4.748.00 Zone-2 Demand 7.99 Fixed 7.99 4,901.45 66.39 J-222 4,741.90 Zone-2 Demand 15.63 Fixed 15.63 4,901.45 69.03 J-223 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 23.96 Fixed 23.96 4,901.45 70.98 J-224 1 4,737.40 Zone-2 IDemand 12.75 Fixed 12.75 4,901.47 70.98 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:47:58 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 7 • ScenariolDerage Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (n) J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 37.00 Fixed 37.00 5,091.39 133.64 J-226 4,800.50 Zone-1 Demand 36.10 Fixed 36.10 5,091.29 125.81 J-227 4,809.90 Zone-1 Demand 1 260.10 Fixed 260.10 5,090.87 121.56 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Ma lerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13101 11:47:58 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 7 • Scena*average Day • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-1 250.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.80 Open 382.34 5,092.44 5,092.32 0.12 0.48 P-2 28.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.60 Open 382.34 5.092.32 5,092.28 0.04 1.48 P-3 385.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false. 1.15 Open 382.34 5,092.28 5,092.10 0.19 0.48 P-4 188.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 382.33 5,092.10 5.092.00 0.09 0.49 P-5 302.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 382.33 5,092.00 5,091.86 0.14 0.47 P-6 59.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 361.03 5,091.86 5,091.83 0.03 0.48 P-10 67.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.03 Open 73.98 4,901.63 4,901.63 2.93e-3 0.04 P-11 345.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 73.98 4,901.63 4,901.62 0.01 0.02 P-12 192.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 108.07 4,901.62 4,901.61 0.01 0.04 P-13 50.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.50 Open 108.06 4,901.61 4,901.61 2.93e-3 0.06 P-15 360.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 64.28 4,901.60 4,901.59 0.01 0.01 P-16 283.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 68.09 4,901.59 4,901.59 0.01 0.02 P-17 77.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 68.09 4,901.59 4,901.59 1.46e-3 0.02 P-18 360.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 37.15 4,901.59 4,901.59 1.95e-3 0.01 P-19 393.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -2.1e-3 4,901.59 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 P-20 16.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -2.08e-3 4,901.59 4.901.59 0.00 0.00 P-21 16.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -4.42e-3 5,091.50 5,091.50 0.00 0.00 P-24 32.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.60 Open 36.10 5,091.29 5.091.29 4.88e-4 0.02 P-26 34.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 5.091.29 5,091.29 0.00 0.00 P-27 47.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 5,091.31 5,091.31 0.00 0.00 P-28 47.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 4,901.59 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 P-29 65.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.75 Open 0.00 4,901.61 4,901.61 0.00 0.00 P-30 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 4.11e-3 4.901.61 4.901.61 0.00 0.00 P-31 22.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 4,901.61 4,901.61 0.00 0.00 P-32 47.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 4,901.63 4,901.63 0.00 0.00 P-33 55.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 53.10 4,901.72 4,901.70 0.02 0.45 P-34 365.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 359.15 4,901.94 4.901.79 0.14 0.40 P-35 308.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 260.02 4.901.79 4,901.72 0.07 0.22 P-36 28.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 4,901.94 4,901.94 0.00 0.00 P-37 94.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 5,092.10 5,092.10 0.00 0.00 P-38 945.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 504.94 5,093.03 5,092.32 0.71 0.75 P-39 39.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 504.94 5,092.32 5,092.27 0.05 1.28 P-40 71.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 399.40 5,092.27 5,092.22 0.05 0.66 P-41 336.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 399.40 5,092.22 5,092.06 0.16 0.48 P-43 149.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 377.37 5,091.81 5,091.75 0.07 0.46 P-44 63.00 12.01 Ductile Iron 1 130.0 false 0.351 Open 377.37 5,091.751 5.091.711 0.03 0.51 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003tacad\water\cybemet\cybnnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 8 f • Scenario: erage Day Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-46 114.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 . false 0.35 Open 222.10 5,091.57 5,091.55 0.02 0.18 P-47 270.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 222.10 5,091.55 5.091.50 0.05 0.20 P48 49.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 5.092.32 5,092.32 0.00 0.00 P-49 409.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.56 Open 105.54 5.092.27 5,092.13 0.13 0.33 P-50 26.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 5.092.22 5,092.22 0.00 0.00 P-51 26.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 5,091.75 5.091.75 0.00 0.00 P-52 26.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 5,091.55 5,091.55 0.00 0.00 P-53 648.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.20 Open 117.65 4,901.63 4,901.59 0.04 0.05 • P-54 600.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 117.65 4,901.59 4,901.56 0.03 0.05 P-55 598.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 117.65 4,901.56 4.901.53 0.03 0.05 P-56 420.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 63.64 4,901.53 4,901.48 0.05 0.12 P-57 383.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 63.64 4,901.48 4,901.47 0.01 0.02 P-59 569.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 35.10 4.901.47 4,901.46 2.93e-3 0.01 P-60 162.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.45 Open 0.00 4,901.46 4.901.46 0.00 0.00 P-61 18.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 0.00 4,901.59 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 P-62 18.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 0.00 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-63 18.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 0.00 4,901.48 4.901.48 0.00 0.00 P-64 19.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 4.08e-3 4,901.47 4,901.47 0.00 0.00 P-65 100.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open -1.18e-3 5,090.87 5,090.87 0.00 0.00 P-67 135.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.10 Open -260.10 5,090.90 5.090.93 0.03 0.22 P-68 649.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.20 Open -260.10 5,090.93 5.091.07 0.14 0.21 P-69 259.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.20 Open -260.10 5,091.07 5.091.13 0.06 0.21 P-70 415.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.49 Open -260.10 5,091.13 5,091.22 0.09 0.22 P-71 145.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 185.10 5,091.31 5.091.30 0.02 0.11 P-72 43.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 36.10 5,091.30 5.091.29 4.88e-4 0.01 • P-73 1.028.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.20 Open -149.00 5.091.22 5,091.30 0.08 0.08 P-74 1,252.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 5.091.22 5,091.22 0.00 0.00 P-75 330.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.45 Open 267.33 5,091.71 5.091.63 0.09 0.26 P-76 646.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.45 Open 156.23 5,091.63 5,091.57 0.06 0.09 P-77 1.311.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -111.10 5,091.22 5,091.63 0.41 0.31 P-78 62.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.95 Open 21.30 5,091.86 5.091.86 1.46e-3 0.02 P-79 94.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 21.30 5,091.86 5.091.86 1.95e-3 0.02 P-82 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -15.23 5,091.86 5.091.86 4.88e-4 0.01 P-84 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.89 Open -30.71 5,091.86 5,091.87 9.77e-4 0.04 P-86 100.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -44.41 5,091.88 5.091.88 0.01 0.07 P-89 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.01 false 0.74 Open 1 -93.15 5,091.95 5,091.99 0.04 0.25 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM •O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 8 • ScenaoAvera9 a Da • Y Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (1`1/1000ft) (it) P-91 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.63 Open -70.67 5,092.04 5,092.06 0.01 0.21 P-92 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -105.54 5.091.99 5,092.09 0.10 0.30 P-93 106.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open -105.54 5,092.09 5,092.13 0.04 0.39 P-94 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open 0.00 5,091.90 5,091.90 0.00 0.00 P-95 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open 0.00 5.091.88 5,091.88 0.00 0.00 P-96 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open 0.00 5,091.87 5.091.87 0.00 0.00 P-97 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 0.60 5,091.86 5,091.86 0.00 0.00 • P-98 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -71.28 5.091.81 5,091.83 0.01 0.19 P-99 360.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -71.28 5,091.83 5,091.88 0.05 0.15 P-100 159.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -3.92 5,091.88 5.091.88 0.00 0.00 P-101 201.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -3.92 5,091.88 5,091.88 4.88e-4 2.43e-3 P-102 314.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 18.44 5,091.88 5,091.88 3.91e-3 0.01 P-103 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 18.44 5,091.88 5.091.88 4.88e-4 0.01 P-104 360.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.88 Open 17.48 5.091.88 5,091.87 4.39e-3 0.01 P-106 291.00 8.0 Ductile Iron .130.0 false 2.02 Open -67.37 5,091.88 5,091.92 0.04 0.14 P-109 344.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -36.24 5,091.89 5.091.90 0.02 0.04 P-111 344.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open •11.18 5,091.88 5,091.88 1.46e-3 4.26e-3 P-112 234.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.15 Open 17.48 5,091.87 5,091.87 2.93e-3 0.01 P-114 54:00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 110.04 5,091.71 5,091.68 0.03 0.60 P-115 374.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 51.36 5,091.68 5,091.65 0.03 0.08 P-116 178.00 8.0 Ductile.Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 0.00 5,091.65 5.091.65 0.00 0.00 P-117 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -65.87 5,091.57 5,091.58 0.01 0.22 P-119 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 0.00 5,091.59 5,091.59 0.00 0.00 P-120 504.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 58.68 5,091.68 5.091.63 0.05 0.10 • P-122 247.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false. 2.02 Open 51.36 5,091.65 5,091.63 0.02 0.09 P-124 271.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 36.43 5,091.60 5,091.59 0.01 0.05 P-125 223.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 6.25 5.091.59 5,091.59 0.00 0.00 P-127 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 81.77 4,901.68 4,901.67 0.01 0.38 P-128 336.00 .8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 63.48 4,901.67 4,901.63 0.04 0.12 P-129 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 63.48 4,901.63 4,901.63 0.01 0.22 P-130 380.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 42.47 4.901.63 4,901.61 0.02 0.06 P-131 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 42.47 4,901.61 4.901.60 2.44e-3 0.10 P-132 269.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.48 Open 28.05 4,901.60 4,901.60 0.01 0.03 P-133 284.00 8:0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.00 Open 14.94 4.901.60 4,901.59 2.44e-3 0.01 P-134 62.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 14.94 4,901.59 4,901.59 4.88e-4 0.01 P-1351 332.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 0.00 4,901.591 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 8 • Scenario rage Day • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-136 385.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.41 Open -34.08 4,901.62 4,901.63 0.02 0.04 P-138 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 30.37 4.901.63 4,901.63 . 2.93e-3 0.06 P-139 314.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 30.37 4,901.63 4,901.62 0.01 0.03 P-140 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 39.57 4,901.62 4,901.62 2.93e-3 0.07 P-143 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 19.27 4,901.59 4.901.59 9.77e-4 0.02 P-145 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.14 Open 4.08e-3 4.901.59 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 P-149 263.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.12 Open -13.12 4,901.60 4,901.60 1.46e-3 0.01 P-151 413.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.42 Open -14.94 4,901.59 4,901.59 3.42e-3 0.01 P-153 385.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -3.81 4,901.59 4.901.59 0.00 0.00 P-156 19.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.85 Open 33.32 4,901.60 4.901.60 9.77e-4 0.05 P-157 402.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.52 Open 39.89 4.901.61 4.901.59 0.02 0.05 P-159 421.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open 24.38 4,901.57 4,901.56 0.01 0.02 P-160 109.00 8.0 .Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 24.38 4,901.56 4,901.56 2.44e-3 0.02 P-161 283.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 8.04 4,901.56 4,901.56 4:88e-4 1.73e-3 P-162 484.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.29 Open -1.44 4,901.56 4.901.56 0.00 0.00 P-163 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -1.44 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-164 501.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.88 Open -0.23 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-165 385.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.48 Open 0.56 4,901.56 4.901.56 0.00 0.00 P-173 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 9.48 4,901.56 4.901.56 4.88e-4 0.01 P-176 337.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -1.21 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-178 445.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.74 Open -39.72 4,901.57 4,901.59 0.02 0.05 P-179 40.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -0.78 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-182 104.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.52 Open -37.15 4,901.58 4,901.59 0.01 0.07 P-183 66.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 35.10 4,901.46 4,901.46 3.91e-3 0.06 P-186 478.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.09 Open -4.49 4,901.45 4,901.45 4.88e-4 1.02e-3 P-191 336.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -29.37 4,901.46 4.901.47 0.01 0.03 P-193 35.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open -45.68 4,901.47 4,901.47 2.93e-3 0.08 P-195 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -54.02 4,901.52 4,901.53 0.01 0.14 P-196 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 15.78 4,901.47 4,901.47 9.77e-4 0.01 P-197 330.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 15.78 4,901.47 4,901.47 2.93e-3 0.01 P-198 65.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 23.75 4,901.47 4,901.47 1.46e-3 0.02 P-200 181.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open 0.00 4,901.46 4.901.46 0.00 0.00 P-202 25.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 3.95 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-203 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 7.85 4,901.56 4.901.56 4.88e-4 0.02 P-205 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open, 19.09 4,901.57 4.901.56 4.88e-4 0.02 P-208 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -17.79 4,901.56 4,901.57 4.88e-4 0.02 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybernel\cybrmstr.wcd Morrlson-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Pago.i,:r 0 Scenarl, - average Day Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (h) P-209 355.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 328.73 5,092.06 5,091.93 0.13 0.37 P-210 355.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 306.09 5,091.93 5.091.81 0.11 0.32 P-211 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 22.64 5,091.93 5.091.93 1.46e-3 0.02 P-212 388.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 360.99 4.902.24 4,902.08 0.15 0.40 P-213 369.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 359.15 4,902.08 4,901.94 0.15 0.40 P-214 169.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open 21.30 5,091.86 5,091.86 2.93e-3 0.02 P-215 150.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open 3.94 5,091.86 5,091.86 0.00 0.00 P-216 204.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 3.94 5,091.86 5,091.85 4.88e-4 2.39e-3 P-217 204.00 8.0 .Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -15.23 5,091.85 5,091.86 1.95e-3 0.01 P-218 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -15.23 5,091.86 5,091.86 1.46e-3 0.01 P-219 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -30.71 5,091.86 5,091.86 0.01 0.03 P-220 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open -26.98 5,091.87 5,091.87 4.88e-3 0.03 P-221 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open -33.23 5,091.87 5,091.88 0.01 0.04 P-222 130.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.13 Open -44.41 5,091.88 5,691.89 0.01 0.07 P-223 130.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.13 Open -50.66 5.091.89 5,091.90 0.01 0.09 P-224 121.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -86.90 5,091.90 5,091.93 0.03 0.23 P-225 80.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -93.15 5,091.93 5,091.95 0.02 0.28 P-226 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -61.92 5,091.99 5,092.02 0.02 0.11 P-227 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -70.67 5,092.02 5,092.04 0.03 0.15 P-228 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -67.37 5,091.92 5,091.94 0.01 0.21 P-229 350.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -74.31 5.091.94 5,091.99 0.06 0.17 P-230 291.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -22.36 5,091.88 5,091.89 0.01 0.02 P-231 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -36.24 5,091.89 5,091.89 4.39e-3 0.06 P-232 286.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 0.97 5,091.88 5,091.88 4.88e-4 1.71e-3 P-233 80.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -11.18 5,091.88 5,091.88 9.77e-4 0.01 P-234 238.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 17.48 5,091.87 5.091.87 2.93e-3 0.01 P-235 238.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 3.73 5,091.87 5,091.87 0.00 0.00 P-236 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 58.68 5,091.63 5,091.62 0.01 0.17 P-237 410.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 52.78 5,091.62 5,091.58 0.04 0.09 P-238 182.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -13.09 5,091.58 5,091.58 9.77e-4 0.01 P-239 191.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -30.18 5,091.58 5,091.59 0.01 0.03 P-240 217.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 51.36 5,091.63 5,091.61 0.02 0.08 P-241 233.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 36.43 5,091.61 5.091.60 0.01 0.04 P-242 325.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.08 Open 4.23 4,901.59 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 P-243 67.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.08 Open -14.94 4,901.59 4,901.59 9.77e-4 0.01 P-244 84.00 8.01 Ductile Iron 130.01 false 1 3.06 Open -8.78 4,901.59 4,901.59 4.88e-4 0.01 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 8 41• Scenario: rage Day • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-245 301.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -12.25 4,901.59 4.901.59 1.46e-3 4.87e-3 P-246 157.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 19.27 4.901.59 4,901.59 1.95e-3 0.01 P-247 157.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 16.49 4,901.59 4.901.59 1.95e-3 0.01 P-248 226.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -0.97 4,901.59 4,901.59 0.00 0.00 P-249 92.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -13.12 4,901.59 4,901.60 9.77e-4 0.01 P-250 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open 24.89 4,901.60 4,901.60 4.39e-3 0.02 P-251 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open 22.11 4,901.60 4,901.59 3.42e-3 0.02 P-252 249.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -3.65 4,901.60 4.001.60 0.00 0.00 P-253 249.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -14.42 4.901.60 4,901.60 1.95e-3 0.01 P-254 84.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -8.60 4,901.60 4,901.60 4.88e-4 0.01 P-255 301.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -12.07 4,901.60 4,901.60 1.95e-3 0.01 P-256 163.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 39.57 4,901.62 4,901.61 0.01 0.05 P-257 163.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 33.32 4,901.61 4,901.60 0.01 0.04 P-258 246.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.34 Open -9.20 4,901.62 4,901.62 9.77e-4 3.97e-3 P-259 341.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.34 Open -21.01 4,901.62 4,901.63 0.01 0.02 P-260 253.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 68.18 4,901.61 4,901.60 4.39e-3 0.02 P-261 253.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 55.68 4,901.60 4,901.60 2.93e-3 0.01 P-262 272.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -64.46 4,901.63 4.901.67 0.04 0.13 P-263 312.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -18.29 4,901.67 4,901.67 3.91 a-3 0.01 P-264 193.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.37 Open 99.13 4,901.79 4,901.73 0.06 0.33 P-265 196.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.37 Open 81.77 4,901.73 4,901.68 0.04 0.23 P-266 328.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 206.92 4,901.72 4,901.67 0.05 0.15 P-267 328.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 191.64 4,901.67 4,901.63 0.04 0.13 P-268 78.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 39.89 4,901.59 4,901.58 4.88e-3 0.06 P-269 392.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 24.38 4.901.58 4,901.57 0.01 0.02 • P-270 237.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 16.34 4,901.56 4,901.56 2.44e-3 0.01 P-271 223.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 3.95 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-272 276.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open 9.49 4,901.56 4,901.56 9.77e-4 3.54e-3 P-273 65.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open 0.00 4.901.56 4.901.56 0.00 0.00 P-274 156.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 7.85 4,901.56 4,901.56 4.88e-4 3.13e-3 P-275 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 5.54 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-276 277.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open 9.48 4,901.56 4,901.56 9.77e-4 3.53e-3 P-277 293.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -2.67 4,901.56 4,901.56 4.88e-4 1.67e-3 P-278 285.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.94 Open 5.78 4.901.56 4,901.56 4.88e-4 1.71e-3 P-279 55.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.94 Open 0.00 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-280 168.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 19.09 4,901.56 4,901.56 2.44e-3 0.01 TIUe:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 8 • Scena*.Average Day • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) P-281 168.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 16.31 4,901.56 4.901.56 1.46e-3 0.01 P-282 77.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -1.21 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-283 296.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -17.53 4,901.56 4,901.57 3.42e-3 0.01 P-284 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -0.33 4,901.57 4,901.57 0.00 0.00 P-285 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -3.11 4,901.57 4,901.57 0.00 0.00 P-286 306.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -0.78 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-287 228.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -17.79 4,901.56 4,901.56 2.93e-3 0.01 P-288 291,00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -33.68 4,901.57 4.901.58 0.01 0.04 P-289 50.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -37.15 4,901.58 4,901.58 2.93e-3 0.06 P-290 148.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -7.77 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-291 217.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 136.0 false 1.49 Open -16.21 4,901.56 4,901.57 2.44e-3 0.01 P-292 212.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open 0.56 4,901.56 4,901.56 0.00 0.00 P-293 281.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -7.77 4,901.56 4,901.56 9.77e-4 3.48e-3 P-294 300.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -45.68 4,901.47 4.901.49 0.02 0.07 P-295 281.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -54.02 4,901.49 4,901.52 0.03 0.09 P-296 188.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -7.97 4,901.47 4,901.47 4.88e-4 2.6e-3 P-297 188.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -16.31 4,901.47 4,901.47 2.44e-3 0.01 P-298 466.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.69 Open -9.92 4,901.46 4,901.46 1.95e-3 4.19e-3 P-299 79.09 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.69 Open -29.37 4,901.46 4,901.46 2.93e-3 0.04 P-300 331.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open 23.75 4.901.47 4,901.46 0.01 0.02 P-301 391.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open 18.19 4,901.46 4,901.46 4.39e-3 0.01 P-302 153.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -2.28 4,901.46 4,901.46 0.00 0.00 P-303 63.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -9.92 4,901.46 4,901.46 0.00 0.00 P-304 169.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -12.48 4.901.45 4,901.45 9.77e-4 0.01 P-305 166.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -20.47 4.901.45 4,901.46 2.93e-3 0.02 • P-306 224.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -4.49 4,901.45 4,901.45 0.00 0.00 P-307 221.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -12.48 4,901.45 4,901.45 1.46e-3 0.01 P-308 257.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 11.14 4,901.45 4,901.45 1.46e-3 0.01 P-309 322.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -4.49 4,901.45 4,901.45 4.88e-4 1.52e-3 P-310 197.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 35.10 4,901.46 4,901.45 0.01 0.04 P-311 198.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 11.14 4,901.45 4,901.45 9.77e-4 4.93e-3 P-312 277.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 47.86 4,901.47 4,901.47 2.93e-3 0.01 P-313 322.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 35.11 4,901.47 4.901.47 1.95e-3 0.01 P-314 580.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.90 Open 222.10 5,091.50 5.091.39 0.11 0.19 P-315 580.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.90 Open 185.10 5,091.39 5.091.31 0.08 0.13 P-3161 440.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.01 false 0.00 Open 36.10 5.091.29 5,091.29 2.44e-31 0.01 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 8 • Scenario:orage Day • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-317 434.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 5.091.29 5.091.29 0.00 0.00 P-318 154.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open -1.5e-3 5,090.87 5,090.87 0.00 0.00 P-319 154.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open -260.10 5,090.87 5,090.90 0.04 0.23 P-320 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 382.34 4,755.10 4,755.10 0.00 0.00 P-321 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 504.94 4,782.80 4,782.80 0.00 0.00 P-322 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -3.2e-3 4.810.40 4,810.40 0.00 0.00 P-323 1 357.001 8.01 Ductile Iron 1 130..01 false I 0.00 Open 1 -53.101 4.901.671 4,901.701 0.031 0.08 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybernet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:49:23 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 8 of 8 • Scenario✓erage Day • . Steady State Analysis Valve Report Label Elevation Diameter Minor Control Discharge From To Headloss (ft) (in) Loss Status (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) Coefficient (ft) (ft) PRV-1 4.752.00 8.0 10.00 Throttling 361.03 5,091.83 4,902.24 189.60 PRV-2 4,776.00 8.0 0.00 Closed 0.00 4,901.59 5,091.50 0.00 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer.Monson-Maierte Inc. h:\3384%003Xacad\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:50:45 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Scenario: Orage Day is Steady State Analysis Pump Report Label Elevation Pump Shutoff Shutoff Design Design Maximum Maximum Control Intake Discharge Discharge Pump Calculated (ft) Power Head Discharge Head Discharge Operating Operating Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Water (Hp) (ft) (gpm) (ft) (gpm) Head Discharge Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (Hp) PMP-1 4.755.00 346.50 0.00 300.30 916.34 231.00 1,502.96 On 4,755.10 5.092.44 382.34 337.34 32.56 PMP-2 4,782.70 323.40 0.00 277.00 1,000.87 231.00 1.455.23 On 4,782.80 5,093.03 504.94 310.23 39.55 PMP-3 1 4.810.301 1 265.651 0.00 231.00 1 1,036.47 161.701 1.875.861 Pump cannot deliver head(Closed 4.810.40 5.090.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:51:05 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenali..._. Average Day Steady State Analysis Reservoir Report Label Elevation Zone Inflow Calculated (ft) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) R-1 4,810.40 Zone-1 3.2e-3 4,810.40 R-2 4,782.80 Zone-1 -504.94 4,782.80 R-3 1 4,755.101 Zone-1 1 -382.341 4,755.10 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:51:22 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Calculation Results Summary Scenario: Max Day [Analysis Started] Tue Nov 13 11:52:32 2001 [Fire Flow] Failed to Converge.......6 • {WARNING}Fire Flow Node'J-30'failed to converge. {WARNING}Fire Flow Node'J•47"failed to converge. {WARNING}Fire Flow Node'J-49"failed to converge. {WARNING}Fire Flow Node'J•62'failed to converge. {WARNING}Fire Flow Node"J-106"failed to converge. {WARNING}Fire Flow Node'J•164"failed to converge. Satisfied Constraints .... 74 Failed Constraints .......0 Total Nodes Computed .....80 [Steady State] 0:00:00 Balanced after 4 trials; relative flow change=0.026767 Trial 1: relative flow change= 1.710230 PRV"PRV-1"switched from open to active PRV"PRV-2'switched from open to closed Trial 2:relative flow change=0.499813 Trial 3: relative flow change=0.284681 Trial 4: relative flow change=0.026767 Flow Summary Flow Supplied 2,159.82 gpm Flow Demanded 2,159.75 gpm Flow Stored 0.00 gpm 0:00:00 Reservoir"R-1"is emptying 0:00:00 Reservoir"R-2'is emptying 0:00:00 Reservoir"R-3"is emptying 0:00:00 PRV"PRV-1'active 0:00:00 PRV"PRV-2"closed [Analysis Ended] Tue Nov 13 11:52:37 2001 S • • Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer.Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Materle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:53:13 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scena..%). Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum ZonE Calculated Minimum Minimum Systerr Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-1 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-2 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-3 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-4 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-5 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-7 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A • J-8 Zone-2 N/A false nit 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-9 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-10 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-11 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-12 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-13 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-14 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-15 Zone-2 N/A false nil. 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-16 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-17 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-18 Zone-2 23 true true 1,500.00 2,253.77 1,500.00 2,253.77 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.73 J-142 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-19 Zone-1 17 true true 1,500.00 4,853.581,500.00 4,853.58 20.00 30.66 20.00 20.00 J-69 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-20 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-21 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-22 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-23 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-24 Zone-1 21 true true 1,500.00 3,321.861,500.00 3,321.86 20.00 20.00 20.00 42.30 J-23 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-25 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-26 Zone-2 19 true true 1,500.00 2,191.71 1,500.00 2,191.71 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.26 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-27 Zone-2 16 true true 1,500.00 2,340.841,500.00 2,340.84 20.00 27.08 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-28 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-29 Zone-2 22 true true 1,500.00 2,332.93 1,500.00 2,332.93 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.51 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-30 Zone-2 41 false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-31 Zone-2 19 true true 1,500.00 2,387.101,500.00 2,387.10 20.00 28.09 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-32 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-33 Zone-2 19 true true. 1,500.00 2,489.691,500.00 2,489.69 20.00 27.52 .20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-34 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-35 Zone-1 22 true true 1,500.00 3,426.38 1,500.00 3,426.38 20.00 20.00 20.00 31.38 J-3 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-36 I Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A I N/A Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\aced\water\cybemet\cybrrnsir.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:53:44 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • ScenheMax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum ZonE Calculated Minimum i Minimum Systerr Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints. (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-37 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-38 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-39 Zone-1 N/A false nit 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-40 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-41 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-42 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-43 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-44 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-45 Zone-1 20 true true 1,500.00 3.870.241,500.00 3,870.24 20.00 20.00 20.00 47.16 J-69 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-46 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-47 Zone-1 41 false nil 1,500.00 NA N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-48 Zone-1 18 true true 1,500.00 4,001.81 1,500.00 4,001.81 20.00 20.00 20.00 37.98 J-69 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-49 Zone-1 41 false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-50 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-51 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-52 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-53 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-54 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-55 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-56 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-57 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-58 Zone-2 22 true true 1,500.00 2,343.72 1,500.00 2,343.72 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.31 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-59 Zone-2 22 true true 1.500.00 2,292.19 1,500.00 2,292.19 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.85 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-60 Zone-2 24 true true 1,500.00 2.142.601,500.00 2.142.60 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.34 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-61 Zone-2 21 true true 1,500.00 2,113.42 1.500.00 2,113.42 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.45 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-62 Zone-1 41 false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-63 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-64 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-65 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-66 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-67 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20:00 N/A N/A J-68 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-69 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-70 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-71 Zone-1 N/A I false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 1 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:53:44 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 7 • 0' � Scenario- Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum Zone Calculated Minimum Minimum Systerr Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-72 Zone-1 18 true true 1,500.00 .3,721.59 1,500.00 3,721.59 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.19 J-71 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-73 Zone-1 20 true true 1,500.00 3.821.151,500.00 3,821.15 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.69 J-175 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-74 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-75 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-76 Zorte-1 17 true true 1,500.00 4,358.91 1,500.00 4,358.91 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.99 J-177 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-77 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-78 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A .20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-79 Zone-1 19 true true 1,500.00 4,490.731,500.00 4,490.73 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.38 J-86 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-80 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-81 Zone-1 19 true true 1,500.00 4,752.11 1,500.00 4,752.11 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.85 J-180 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-82 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-83 Zone-1 21 true true 1,500.00 4,931.261,500.00 4,931.26 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.04 J-69 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-84 Zone-1 18 true true 1,500.00 4,638.771,500.00 4,638.77 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.15 J-46 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-85 Zone-1 16 true true 1,500.00 3,719.81 1,500.00 3,719.81 20.00 20.00 20.00 52.17 J-69 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-86 Zone-1 20 true true 1,500.00 3,649.26 1,500.00 3,649.26 20.00 20.00 20.00 50.81 J-78 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-87 Zone-1 19 true true 1,500.00 3,601.51 1,500.00 3,601.51 20.00 20.00 20.00 50.02 J-77 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-88 Zone-1 20 true true 1,500.00 3,357.531,500.00 3,357.53 20.00 20.00 20.00 46.71 J-74 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-89 Zone-1 19 true true 1,500.00 4,973.731,500.00 4,973.73 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.77 J-69 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-90 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1;500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-91 Zone-1 20 true true 1,500.00 4,691.25 1,500.00 4,691.25 20.00 20.00 20.00 27.56 J-92 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-92 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-93 Zone-1 20 true true 1,500.00 4,474.851,500.00 4,474.85 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.68 J-94 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-94 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-95 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-97 Zone-1 19 true true 1,500.00 4,534.791,500.00 4,534.79 20.00 20.00 20.00 24.54 J-182 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-98 Zone-1 16 true true 1,500.00 4,362.34 1,500.00 4,362.34 20.00 20.00 20.00 24.78 J-183 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-99 Zone-1 21 true true 1,500.00 4.227.601,500.00 4,227.60 20.00 20.00 20.00 24.57 J-184 20.00 0:04 PMP-2 J-100 Zone-1 17 true. true 1,500.00 4,064.75 1,500.00 4,064.75 20.00 20.00 20.00 29.98 J-185 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-101 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-102 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-103 Zone-1 16 true true 1,500.00 3,659.11 1,500.00 3,659.11 20.00 20.00 20.00 41.82 J-102 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-104 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-105 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-106 Zone-1 41 false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-107 Zone-1 21 true true 1,500.00 4,396.37 1.500.00 4,396.37 20.00 20:00 20.00 24.52 J-186 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybmtstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11113/01 11:53:44 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 7 Scenarioax Day • • Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum ZonE Calculated Minimum Minimum SysterT Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-108 Zone-1 17 true true 1,500.00 4,058.91 1,500.00 4,058.91 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.85 J-188 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-109 Zone-1 19 true true 1,500.00 4,119.17 1,500.00 4,119.17 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.85 J-188 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-110 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-111 Zone-2 21 true true 1,500.00 2.377.101,500.00 2,377.10 20.00 28.82 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-112 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-113 Zone-2 20 true true 1,500.00 2,353.45 1,500.00 2,353.45 20.00 26.11 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-114 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-115 Zone-2 21 true true 1.500.00 2,338.67 1.500.00 2,338.67 20.00 23.02 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-116 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-117 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-118 Zone-2 22 true true 1,500.00 2,234.281,500.00 2,234.28 20.00 21.72 20.00 20.00 J-120 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-119 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-120 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-121 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-122 Zone-2 17 true true 1,500.00 2.355.691,500.00 2,355.69 20.00 28.75 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-123 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-124 Zone-2 18 true true 1,500.00 2,345.29 1,500.00 2,345.29 20.00 25.52 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-125 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-126 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-127 Zone-2 20 true true 1,500.00 2,321.721,500.00 2,321.72 20.00 21.96 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-128 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-129 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-130 Zone-2 20 true true 1,500.00 2,321.64 1.500.00 2,321.64 20.00 20.20 20.00 20.00 J-120 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-131 Zone-2 22 true true 1.500.00 2,235.351,500.00 2.235.35 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.66 J-189 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-132 Zone-2 18 true true 1,500.00 2,335.75 1,500.00 2,335.75 20.00 24.65 20.00 20.00 J-18 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 • J-133 Zone-2 21 true true 1,500.00 2,326.761,500.00 2,326.76 20.00 22.05 20.00 20.00 J-142 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-134 Zone-2 22 true true 1,500.00 2,308.51 1,500.00 2,308.51 20.00 21.41 20.00 20.00 J-142 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-135 Zone-2 19 true true 1,500.00 2.290.05 1,500.00 2,290.05 20.00 22.67 20.00 20.00 J-214 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J 136 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-137 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-138 Zone-2 19 true true 1.500.00 2.257.46 1,500.00 2,257.46 20.00 21.11 20.00 20.00 J-214 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-139 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-140 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-141 Zone-2 21 true true 1,500.00 2,145.64 1,500.00 2,145.64 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.40 J-214 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-142 I Zone-2 23 true true 11,500.00 2,147.651,500.00 2,147.651 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.96 J-214 20.00 0.041 PMP-2 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:53:44 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 7 • SceiPa: Max Da • Y Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum Zone Calculated Minimum Minimum Systerr Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-143• Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-144 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-145 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-146 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-147 Zone-2 20 true true 1,500.00 2.047.66 1.500.00 2,047.66 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.88 J-204 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-148 Zone-2 20 true true 1,500:00 2,274.64 1,500.00 2,274.64 20.00 21.57 20.00 20.00 J-214 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-149 Zone-2 25 true true 1,500.00 2,057.27 1.500.00 2,057.27 20.00 20.00 20.00 24.12 J-207 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-150 Zone-2 22 true true 1,500.00 2,248.931,500.00 2,248.93 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.87 J-214 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-151 Zone-2 24 true true 1,500.00 2.217.001,500.00 2,217.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.57 J-141 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-152 Zone-2 18 true true 1,500.00 2,272.26 1,500.00 2,272.26 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.43 J-212 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-153 Zone-2 20 true true 1,500.00 2,150.241,500.00 2,150.24 20.00 22.54 20.00 20.00 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-154 Zone-2 18 true true 1,500.00 2,100.931,500.00 2,100.93 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.17 J-222 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-155 Zone-2 19 true true 1,500.00 2,044.11 1,500.00 2,044.11 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.18 J-156 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-156 Zone-2 16 true true 1.500.00 2,038.381,500.00 2,038.38 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.09 J-221 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-157 Zone-2 23 true true 1,500.00 2,055.88 1,500.00 2,055.88 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.66 J-221 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-158 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-159 Zone-2 21 true true 1,500.00 2,084.46 1,500.00 2,084.46 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.46 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-160 Zone-2 25 true true 1,500.00 2.123.32 1.500.00 2,123.32 20.00 20.07 20.00 20.00 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-161 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-162 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-163 Zone-2 22 true true 1,500.00 2,155.03 1,500.00 2,155.03 20.00 24.70 20.00 20.00 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-164 Zone-2 41 false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-165 Zone-2 .21 true true 1,500.00 2,155.58 1,500.00 2,155.58 20.00 26.00 20.00 20.00 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 • J-166 Zone-2 24 true true 1,500,00 2,132.561,500.00 2,132,56 20,00 24.52 20,00 20,00 J-1511 20.00 0,04 PMP-2 J-167 Zone-2 23 true true 1,500.00 2.009.781,500.00 2,009.78 20.00 20.00 20.00 24.87 J-158 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-168 Zone-2 18 true true 1,500.00 2,245.22 1,500.00 2,245.22 20.00 20.13 20.00 20.00 J-147 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-169 Zone-2 21 true true 1,500.00 2,269.87 1,500.00 2.269.87 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.34 J-149 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-170 Zone-2 25 true true 1,500.00 2,270.35 1.500.00 2,270.35 20.00 21.17 20.00 20.00 J-142 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-171 Zone-2 16 true true 1,500.00 2,240.72 1,500.00 2,240.72 20.00 20.07 20.00 20.00 J-142 20.00 0.04 PMP-2 J-172 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-173 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-174 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-175 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-176 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-177 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 1 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A I N/A Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybernet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:53:44 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 7 • Scenar. ax Day • Fire Flo*n alY sis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum ZonE Calculated Minimum Minimum Systerr Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-178 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-179 Zone-1 N/A false nit 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-180 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-181 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-182 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-183 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-184 Zone-1 N/A false nit 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-185 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-186 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-187 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-188 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-189 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-190 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-191 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-192 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-193 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-194 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-195 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-196 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-197 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-198 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-199 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-200 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-201 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-202 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-203 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A _ J-204 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-205 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-206 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-207 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-208 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-209 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-210 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-211 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A. 20.00 N/A N/A J-212 I Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A I N/A 20.00 N/A 1 20.00 N/A I N/A 1 20.00 N/A I N/A Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:53:44 AM 0 Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 7 • Sce0a: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Flow Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Minimum ZonE Calculated Minimum Minimum Systerr Calculated Minimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone Pressure Minimum System Constraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (psi) System Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure Pressure (psi) (psi) J-213 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-214 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-215 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-216 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-217 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-218 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-219 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-220 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-221 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-222 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-223 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-224 Zone-2 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-225 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-226 Zone-1 N/A false nil 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A N/A 20.00 N/A N/A J-227 Zone-1 N/A I false I nil 11,500.001 N/A I N/A I N/A 1 20.00 N/A 1 20.00 1, N/A I N/A 1 20.00 N/A I N/A Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer.Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\33841003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:53:44 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 7 • Scenari aax Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-30 4,746.50 Zone-2 Demand 1,500.00 Fixed 1,500.00 4,867.89 52.52 J-227 4,809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,038.95 99.10 J-225 4.782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5,037.77 110.44 J-202 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4,881.05 56.40 J-226 4.800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5.037.86 102.69 J-223 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 4,880.61 61.96 J-217 4.746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 48.63 4,880.64 58.16 J-176 4.757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5,009.58 109.19 J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,037.70 114.56 J-200 4.750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4,885.79 58.75 J-175 4,752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5,001.59 107.68 J-189 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4.881.35 48.87 J-173 4.782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5,037.82 110.68 J-185 4,765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed 40.80 5,025.97 112.87 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4,883.37 58.78 J-209 4,763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,881.10 50.92 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5,029.60 112.83 J-183 4.771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5,032.60 112.84 J-224 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 31.88 Fixed 31.88 4,880.70 62.00 J-177 4,761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5,019.84 111.64 J-211 4.768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,881.13 48.55 J-206 4,758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,881.08 53.25 J-192 4.762.90 Zone-2. Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4,881.41 51.28 J-222 4,741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4.880.60 60.01 J-220 4,750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,880.61 56.38 J-197 4,754.60 Zone-2 Demand 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4,882.24 55.22 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,037.70 • 112.14 J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4.881.61 52.53 J-198 4,754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,881.21 54.67 J-221 4.748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80` Fixed 21.80 4,880.60 57.37 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4,881.12 47.34 J-215 4,740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,880.83 60.76 J-187 4,775.10 Zone-1 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5,037.70 113.61 J-216 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,880.69 60.35 J-182 4,776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5.035.75 112.38 J-219 4.750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,880.63 56.21 J-110 1 4,772.30 Zone-1 I Demand 18.40 Fixed 18.401 5.037.691 114.82 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 12:00:14 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • SCeO.J: Max Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (rt) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (h) J-47 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 1,500.00 Fixed 1,500.00 . 5,015.94 100.91 J-227 4,809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,028.48 94.57 J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5.026.31 105.48. J-202 4.750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4.898.94 64.14 J-226 4.800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5,026.53 97.79 J-223 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 . 4,898.28 69.61 J-217 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 48.63 4,898.31 65.81 J-176 4,757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5.026.57 116.54 '0, J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,026.04 109.52 J-200 4,750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4.899.70 64.77 J-189 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4,899.05 56.53 J-175 4,752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5,027.09 118.72 J-173 4,782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5,025.91 105.53 J-185 4,765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed 40.80 5.026.00 112.88 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4.899.43 65.73 J-209 4.763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,898.94 58.64 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5,025.98 111.27 J-183 4,771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5.025.97 109.97 J-224 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 31.88 Fixed 31.88' 4,898.37 69.64 J-177 4,761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5,026.17 114.38 J-206 4,758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.93 60.97 J-211 4.768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4.898.95 56.26 J-192 4.762.90 Zone-2 Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4.899.07 58.92 J-220 4,750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.29 64.03 J-222 4.741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.28 67.66 J-197 4,754.60 Zone-2 Demand 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4.899.21 62.56 J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4,899.11 60.10 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,026.06 107.11 J-198 4,754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,899.11 62.41 J-221 4,748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80 Fixed 21.80 4,898.29 65.02 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4.898.95 55.06 J-215 4,740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.50 68.40 J-187 4,775.10 Zone-1 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5,026.07 108.58 J-216 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4.898.37 68.00 J-182 4,776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5,025.98 108.15 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,898.31 63.86 J-110 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 18.401 Fixed 18.40 5,026.06 109.79 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 12:01:09 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • Scenariloax Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (h) J-49 4.779.00 Zone-1 Demand 1,500.00 Fixed 1,500.00 5,012.77 101.14 J-227 4.809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,025.99 93.49 J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5,023.01 104.06 J-202 4.750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4,898.93 64.13 J-226 4,800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5,023.49 96.48 J-223 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 4,898.27 69.60 J-217 4.746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 46.63 4,898.29 65.80 J-176 4,757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5.027.75 117.05 J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,023.69 108.51 • J-200 4.750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4,899.70 64.77 J-189 4.768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4,899.04 56.52 J-175 4.752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5.028.27 119.22 J-173 4.782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5.026.64 105.84 J-185 4,765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed 40.80 5,027.18 113.39 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4,899.43 65.73 J-209 4.763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,898.62 58.63 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5,027.13 111.77 J-183 4.771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5,027.08 110.45 J-224 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 31.88 Fixed 31.88 4,898.35 69.64 J-177 4.761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5.027.36 114.90 J-206 4.758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4.898.91 60.97 J-211 4.768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.92 56.25 J-192 4.762.90 Zone-2 Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4,899.06 58.91 J-220 4,750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.27 64.02 J-222 4,741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4.898.26 67.65 J-197 4,754.60 Zone-2 Demand. 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4,899.19 62.56 • J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4,899.10 60.09 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,023.72 106.09 J-198 4.754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,899.09 62.41 J-221 4,748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80 Fixed 21.80 4,898.26 65.01 J-213 4.771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4.898.92 55.04 J-187 4.775.10 Zone-1 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5.023.32 107.39 J-215 4,740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.49 68.40 J-216 4.741.20 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.35 67.99 J-182 4.776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5,027.11 108.64 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,898.28 63.85 J-181 4,778.80 Zone-1 Demand 18.40 Fixed 18.40 5,027.46 107.58 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 12:02:03 PM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 Scena. Max Day Steady State.Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-62 4,810.29 Zone-1 Demand 1,500.00 Fixed 1,500.00 5,021.91 91.56 J-227 4,809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,021.93 91.73 J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5,026.48 105.56 J-202 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4,898.93 64.13 J-226 4,800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5.025.67 97.42 J-223 4.737.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 4,898.27 69.60 J-217 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 48.63 4,898.29 65.80 J-176 4,757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5,031.39 118.63 J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,028.27 110.49 J-200 4,750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4,899.70 64.77 J-189 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4,899.04 56.52 J-175 4,752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5.031.79 120.75 J-173 4,782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5.030.59 107.55 J-185 4.765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed 40.80 5,030.98 115.03 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4,899.43 65.73 J-209 4,763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,898.92 58.63 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5.030.94 113.42 J-183 4,771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5,030.91 112.11 J-224 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 31.88 Fixed 31.88 4,898.35 69.64 J-177 4,761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5.031.11 116.52 J-206 4,758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.91 60.97 J-211 4,768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.92 56.25 J-192 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4,899.06 58.91 J-222 4,741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.26 67.65 J-220 4.750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.27 64.02 • J-197 4,754.60 Zone-2 Demand 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4,899.20 62.56 J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4,899.10 60.09 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,028.31 108.08 J-198 4.754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,899.09 62.41 J-221 4,748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80 Fixed 21.80 4,898.26 65.01 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4,898.92 55.04 J-216 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.35 67.99 J-187 4,775.10 Zone-1 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5,028.08 109.45 J-215 4,740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.49 68.40 J-182 4.776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5,030.98 110.32 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,898.28 63.85 J-110 1 4,772.30 Zone-1 IDemand 1 18.40 Fixed 18.40 5,028.111 110.68 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 03:27:13 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • ScenarA- ax Day • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-106 070.50 Zone-1 Demand 1,500.00 Fixed 1.500.00 5,005.69 101.75 J-227 4.809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,026.37 93.65 J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5,023.93 104.45 J-202 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4,898.93 64.13 J-226 4,800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5,024.19 96.78 J-223 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 4,898.27 69.60 J-217 4.746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 48.63 4,898.29 65.80 J-176 4,757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5,027.46 116.93 J-188 4.772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,017.67 105.90 • J-200 4,750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4.899.70 64.77 J-189 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4,899.04 56.52 J-175 4.752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5,027.98 119.10 J-173 4.782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5,026.32 105.71 J-185 4,765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed 40.80 5.026.87 113.25 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4,899.43 65.73 J-209 4.763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,898.92 58.63 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5,026.82 111.63 J-183 4,771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5,626.77 110.31 J-224 4.737.40 Zone-2 Demand 31.88 Fixed 31.88 4,898.35 69.64 J-177 4.761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5,027.06 114.76 J-206 4,758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4.898.91 60.97 J-211 4,768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.92 56.25 J-192 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4.899.06 58.91 J-222 4.741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.26 67.65 J-220 4,750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4.898.27 64.02 J-197 4.754.60 Zone-2 Demand 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4,899.19 62.56 J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4,899.10 60.09 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,022.51 105.57 J-198 4.754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,899.09 62.41 J-221 4,748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80 Fixed 21.80 4.898.26 65.01 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4,898.92 55.04 J-216 4.741.20 Zone-2 Demand. 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4.898.35 67.99 J-187 4,775.10 Zone-1 'Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5,018.44 105.28 J-215 4,740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.49 68.40 J-182 4,776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5,026.80 108.51 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,898.28 63.85 J-110 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 18.40 Fixed 18.40 5,014.75 104.90 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\aCad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 03:28:09 PM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Poop 1 4-f 7 • Sce o: Max Da • Y Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-164 4,738.80 Zone-2 Demand 1,500.00 Fixed 1,500.00 4.861.05 52.89 J-227 4,809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,038.95 99.10 J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5,037.77 110.44 J-202 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4,881.46 56.55 J-226 4.800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5,037.86 102.69 J-223 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 4,862.42 54.09 J-217 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 48.63 4,861.75 49.99 J-176 4.757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5,009.56 109.18 • J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,037.69 114.56 J-200 4,750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4,885.87 58.79 J-189 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4,881.68 49.01 J-175 4,752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5,001.57 107.67 J-173 4,782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5,037.82 110.68 J-185 4,765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed. 40.80 5,025.95 112.86 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4,883.25 58.73 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5,029.59 112.83 J-209 4,763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,881.46 51.08 J-183 4.771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5,032.60 112.84 J-224 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 31.88 Fixed 31.88 4,862.78 54.25 J-177 4,761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5,019.82 111.63 J-211 4,768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,881.48 48.71 J-206 4,758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,881.43 53.40 J-192 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4,881.75 51.42 J-220 4,750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,861.95 48.31 J-222 4,741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,862.25 52.07 J-197 4,754.60 Zone-2 Demand 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4,882.51 55.34 . J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4,881.93 52.67 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,037.70 112.14 J-198 4,754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,881.56 54.82 J-221 4,748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80 Fixed 21.80 4,862.01 49.33 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4,881.48 47.50 J-187 4,775.10 Zone-1 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5,037.70 113.61 J-216 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,861.88 52.21 J-215 4,740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,861.32 52.32 J-182 4,776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5,035.75 112.38 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,861.88 48.10 J-181 1 4,778.801Zone-1 Demand 18.40 Fixed 18.40 5,036.72 111.59 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 03:29:34 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • Scena*Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-1 4.755.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.067.26 135.10 J-2 4.755.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.09 135.03 J-3 4,753.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.40 135.38 J-4 4,753.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.05 135.44 J-5 4.752.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,065.52 135.65 J-7 4.748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.899.69 65.41 J-8 4,746.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.21 66.07 J-9 4.746.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.20 66.06 J-10 4,749.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.16 64.75 . J-11 4,751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.13 64.09 J-12 4,751.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.11 63.91 J-13 4.758.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 :Fixed 0.00 4,899.08 60.91 J-14 4,762.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.899.06 59.08 J-15 4,765.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.04 57.78 J-16 4,766.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.03 57.38 J-17 4,770.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.02 55.61 J-18 4,776.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.02 53.23 J-19 4,776.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.67 125.54 J-20 4,788.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.52 120.29 J-21 4.794.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.51 117.90 J-22 4,794.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.51 117.90 J-23 4.807.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.50 112.27 J-24 4,807.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.50 112.27 J-25 4,788.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.52 120.29 J-26 4,765.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.04 57.78 J-27 4,751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.13 64.09 J-28 4,751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.13 64.09 J-29 4.751.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.13 64.09 J-30 4,746.50 Zone-2 Demand- 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.899.20 66.06 J-31 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.56 65.36 J-32 4,749.50 Zone-2 Demand. 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,900.02 65.12 J-33 4,752.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,900.74 64.14 J-34 4,752.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,900.74 64.14 J-35 4,753.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.40 135.38 J-36 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,068.30 123.57 J-37 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,068.16 123.50 J-38 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00. Fixed 0.00 5,068.03 123.45 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM Q Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • • ScerT!io: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-39 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.60 123.35 J-40 4.781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.05 123.54 J-41 4.781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.96 123.51 J-42 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.92 123.49 J-43 4,777.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.74 124.97 J-44 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.72 123.40 J-45 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.068.30 123.57 J-46 4,777.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.73 125.79 • J-47 4,782.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,068.03 123.45 J-48 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.96 123.51 J-49 4.779.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.72 124.48 J-50 4,741.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.02 68.07 J-51 4,740.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.85 68.51 J-52 4,738.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.68 69.30 J-53 4.738.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.41 69.18 J-54 4,738.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.37 69.39 J-55 4,736.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.35 69.89 J-56 4,734.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.33 70.80 J-57 4,734.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.33 70.88 J-58 4,741.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.02 68.07 J-59 4,740.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.85 68.51 J-60 4,738.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.41 69.18 J-61 4,736.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.35 69.89 J-62 4.810.29 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.53 110.86 J-63 4,809.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.41 111.15 J-64 4.809.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.42 111.29 J-65 4,802.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.46 114.42 J-66 4,800.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.48 115.03 J-67 4,797.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.51 116.21 J-68 4,794.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.51 117.90 J-69 4,817.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.51 107.95 J-70 4,781.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.82 123.45 J-71 4,750.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,065.54 136.22 J-72 4,751.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,065.57 135.97 J-73 4,754.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,065.67 134.80 J-74 4,759.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,065.93 132.40 J-75 1 4.759.90 Zone-1 IDemand 1 0.00 Fixed 10.00 5,065.98 132.43 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 7 • Scenar.6ax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (tt) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (n) J-76 4,763.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.29 130.92 J-77 4.764.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.34 130.81 J-78 4,768.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.59 129.06 J-79 4,770.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.66 128.27 J-80 4,771.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.85 127.96 J-81 4.774.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.10 126.59 J-82 4.776.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.067.30 125.77 J-83 4,781.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.53 123.97 J-84 4.777.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.067.60 125.73 • J-85 4,773.22 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.85 127.04 J-86 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.59 128.84 J-87 4.764.40 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.34 130.63 J-88 4,758.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,065.93 132.97 J-89 4,780.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.067.05 124.11 J-90 4.774.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.03 126.52 J-91 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.94 127.22 J-92 4,770.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.83 128.16 J-93 4.768.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.65 129.13 J-94 4,768.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.61 129.11 J-95 4.766.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.51 129.93 J-97 4.775.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.06 Fixed 0.00 5,067.12 126.04 J-98 4,772.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.83 127.47 J-99 4,769.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.59 128.71 J-100 4,766.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.44 129.85 J-101 4.780.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.87 123.77 J-102 4,774.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.82 126.34 J-103 4,772.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.82 127.47 J-104 4.777.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.74 124.97 J-105 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.74 127.39 J-106 4.770.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.74 128.17 J-107 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.79 124.73 J-108 4.773.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5.066.78 126.89 J-109 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,066.75 127.39 J-110 4,772.30 Zone-1 Demand 18.40 Fixed 18.40 5,066.74 127.39 J-111 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.899.49 64.46 J-112 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.44 64.44 J-113 4,754.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.25 62.54 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybernet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM O Haestad Methods.Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 7 • Scet,o: Max Da •y Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type .Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-114 4,754.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.22 62.44 J-115 4,760.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.899.12 59.93 J-116 4,760.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.11 59.84 J-117 4,763.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.899.07 58.66 J-118 4,766.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.06 57.18 J-119 4,767.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.06 56.79 J-120 4.772.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.06 54.89 J-121 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.25 65.22 • J-122 4,748.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.23 65.22 J-123 4,754.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.19 62.60 J-124 4,754.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.18 62.42 J-125 4.760.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.10 60.18 J-126 4,763.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.06 58.61 J-127 4,764.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.06 58.35 J-128 4,768.14 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.04 56.63 J-129 4,770.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.04 55.61 J-130 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.06 58.91 J-131 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.04 56.52 J-132 4,759.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,899.10 60.31 J-133 4,750.65 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.97 64.17 J-134 4,748.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.93 65.13 J-135 4,751.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 63.87 J-136 4,753.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 63.05 J-137 4,755.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 62.01 J-138 4,762.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 59.15 J-139 4,762.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 59.02 J-140 4,768.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 56.30 J-141 4,772.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 54.70 J-142 4,773.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.93 54.18 J-143 4,769.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.94 55.91 J-144 4,766.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.94 57.52 J-145 4,760.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 59.93 J-146 4,756.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 61.53 J-147 4,758.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 60.88 J-148 4,755.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 61.96 J-149 4,762.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.92 59.02 J-150 4,763.40 Zone-2 IDemand 0.00 1 Fixed 0.00 4,898.921 58.63 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer.Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5]4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM _ ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 7 • Scenansax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-151 4,768.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 56.56 J-152 4,770.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.99 55.42 J-153 4,735.48 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.31 70:45 J-154 4,739.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.26 68.82 J-155 4,744.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.26 66.52 J-156 4.746.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.26 65.57 J-157 4,749.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.27 64.41 J-158 4,757.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.28 61.08 J-159 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.28 63.85 • J-160 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.31 65.81 J-161 4,741.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.36 67.82 J-162 4,740.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.35 68.16 J-163 4.742.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.38 67.66 J-164 4,738.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.63 69.15 J-165 4,738.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.37 69.25 J-166 4.741.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.34 67.94 J-167 4.752.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.28 63.07 J-168 4.756.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.92 61.62 J-169 4.760.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.92 60.06 J-170 4.765.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.898.93 57.73 J-171 4.769.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,898.93 56.00 J-172 4,782.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 5,067.30 123.44 J-173 4.782.00 Zone-1 Demand 41.68 Fixed 41.67 5,067.30 123.43 J-174 4.752.30 Zone-2 Demand 4.60 Fixed 4.60 4,901.47 64.54 J-175 4,752.70 Zone-1 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 5.065.60 135.38 J-176 4.757.20 Zone-1 Demand 47.93 Fixed 47.92 5,065.76 133.50 J-177 4,761.80 Zone-1 Demand 30.55 Fixed 30.55 5,066.11 131.66 J-178 4,766.20 Zone-1 Demand 16.68 Fixed 16.67 5,066.45 129.91 J-179 4.770.50 Zone-1 Demand 16.68 Fixed 16.67 5,066.75 128.17 J-180 4,773.40 Zone-1 Demand 16.68 Fixed 16.67 5,066.69 127.02 J-181 4.778.80 Zone-1 Demand 18.40 Fixed 18.40 5,067.40 124.86 J-182 4,776.00 Zone-1 Demand 20.83 Fixed 20.83 5,067.15 125.97 J-183 4,771.80 Zone-1 Demand 32.98 Fixed 32.97 5,066.83 127.65 J-184 4,768.80 Zone-1 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 5,066.59 128.84 J-185 4.765.10 Zone-1 Demand 40.80 Fixed 40.80 5,066.36 130.34 J-186 4,778.50 Zone-1 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 5,066.78 124.72 J-187 4,775.10 Zone-1 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 5,066.741 126.18 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerie,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 7 Scen.,...j. Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-188 4,772.90 Zone-1 Demand 47.75 Fixed 47.75 5,066.75 127.14 J-189 4,768.40 Zone-2 Demand 43.40 Fixed 43.40 4,899.04 56.52 J-190 4,766.80 Zone-2 Demand 9.73 Fixed 9.73 4,899.03 57.21 J-191 4,766.20 Zone-2 Demand 6.95 Fixed 6.95 4,899.05 57.48 J-192 4,762.90 Zone-2 Demand 26.92 Fixed 26.92 4,899.06 58.91 J-193 4,761.80 Zone-2 Demand 6.95 Fixed 6.95 4,899.08 59.39 J-194 4,760.20 Zone-2 Demand 23.45 Fixed 23.45 4,899.10 60.09 J-195 4,758.60 Zone-2 Demand 9.73 Fixed 9.73 4,899.09 60.78 J-196 4,757.30 Zone-2 Demand 15.63 Fixed 15.63 4,899.13 61.36 J-197 4.754.60 Zone-2 Demand 23.60 Fixed 23.60 4,899.20 62.56 J-198 4,754.85 Zone-2 Demand 22.58 Fixed 22.58 4,899.10 62.41 J-199 4,749.50 Zone-2 Demand 11.45 Fixed 11.45 4,899.43 64.87 J-200 4,750.00 Zone-2 Demand 46.88 Fixed 46.88 4,899.70 64.77 J-201 4,747.50 Zone-2 Demand 38.20 Fixed 38.20 4.899.43 65.73 J-202 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 90.28 Fixed 90.28 4,898.93 64.13 J-203 4,754.90 Zone-2 Demand 11.30 Fixed 11.30 4,898.92 62.31 J-204 4,757.80 Zone-2 Demand 9.73 Fixed 9.73 4,898.92 61.05 J-205 4,758.40 Zone-2 Demand 6.95 Fixed 6.95 4,898.92 60.80 J-206 4.758.00 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.92 60.97 J-207 4,762.00 Zone-2 Demand 9.73 Fixed 9.73 4,898.92 59.24 J-208 4.763.20 Zone-2 Demand 6.95 Fixed 6.95 4,898.93 58.72 J-209 4,763.40 Zone-2 Demand 33.85 Fixed 33.85 4,898.92 58.63 J-210 4.767.90 Zone-2 Demand 9.20 Fixed 9.20 4,898.94 56.69 J-211 4,768.90 Zone-2 Demand 28.65 Fixed 28.65 4,898.92 56.26 J-212 4,770.90 Zone-2 Demand 9.20 Fixed 9.20 4,898.98 55.41 J-213 4,771.70 Zone-2 Demand 21.10 Fixed 21.10 4,898.93 55.04 J-214 4.773.50 Zone-2 Demand 12.15 Fixed 12.15 4,898.93 54.27 J-215 4.740.40 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4.898.49 68.40 J-216 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 20.85 Fixed 20.85 4,898.35 67.99 J-217 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 48.63 Fixed 48.63 4,898.29 65.80 J-218 4,746.20 Zone-2 Demand 13.90 Fixed 13.90 4.898.31 65.81 J-219 4,750.70 Zone-2 Demand 19.10 Fixed 19.10 4,898.28 63.85 J-220 4.750.30 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.27 64.02 J-221 4,748.00 Zone-2 Demand 21.80 Fixed 21.80 4,898.26 65.01 J-222 4,741.90 Zone-2 Demand 24.30 Fixed 24.30 4,898.26 67.65 J-223 4,737.40 Zone-2 Demand 62.50 Fixed 62.50 4,898.27 69.60 J-224 4,737.40 Zone-2 IDemand 31.88 Fixed 31.881 4,898.361 69.64 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrTnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 7 • Scenaraax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Demand Pattern Demand Calculated. Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-225 4,782.50 Zone-1 Demand 92.50 Fixed 92.50 5,066.56 122.90 J-226 4,800.50 Zone-1 Demand 90.25 Fixed 90.25 5,066.50 115.08 J-227 4,809.90 Zone-1 Demand 650.25 Fixed 650.25 5,066.40 110.98 • Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:55:47 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 7 • Scenario: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (fI) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-1 250.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.80 Open 775.11 5,067.71 5,067.26 0.46 1.82 P-2 28.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.60 Open 775.11 5,067.26 5,067.09 0.16 5.88 P-3 385.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.15 Open 775.11 5,067.09 5,066.40 0.69 1.80 P-4 188.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 775.10 5,066.40. 5,066.05 0.35 1.86 P-5 302.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 775.10 5,066.05 5,065.52 0.53 1.75 P-6 59.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 855.88 5,065.52 5,065.38 0.14 2.44 P-10 67.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.03 Open 165.87 4,899.21 4,899.20 0.01 0.20 • P-11 345.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 165.86 4.899.20 4,899.16 0.03 0.09 P-12 192.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 250.73 4,899.16 4,899.13 0.04 0.20 P-13 50.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.50 Open 250.73 4,899.13 4.899.11 0.01 0.27 P-15 360.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 139.23 4,899.08 4,899.06 0.02 0.07 P-16 283.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 149.68 4,899.06 4,899.04 0.02 0.08 P-17 77.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 149.67 4,899.04 4,899.03 0.01 0.09 P-18 360.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 81.04 4.899.03 4,899.02 0.01 0.02 P-19 393.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -2.79e-3 4,899.02 4,899.02 0.00 0.00 P-20 16.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 4,899.02 4,899.02 0.00 0.00 P-21 16.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 5,066.67 5,066.67 0.00 0.00 P-24 32.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.60 Open 90.25 5.066.51 5,066.51 2.44e-3 0.08 P-26 34.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.50 5,066.50 0.00 0.00 P-27 47.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 5.066.52 5,066.52 0.00 0.00 P-28 47.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 4,899.04 4,899.04 0.00 0.00 P-29 65.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.75 Open 0.00 4,899.13 4,899.13 0.00 0.00 P-30 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 4,899.13 4,899.13 0.00 0.00 P-31 22.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 0.00 4,899.13 4,899.13 0.00 0.00 • P-32 47.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.09e-3 4,899.20 4,899.20 0.00 0.00 P-33 55.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 124.90 4.899.69 4,899.56 0.12 2.25 P-34 365.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 851.31 4,900.74 4,900.02 0.72 1.97 P-35 308.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 617.09 4,900.02 4,899.69 0.34 1.09 P-36 28.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.09e-3 4,900.74 4,900.74 0.00 0.00 P-37 94.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.40 5,066.40 0.00 0.00 P-38 945.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 871.15 5,070.26 5,068.30 1.96 2.07 P-39 39.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 871.15 5,068.30 5,068.16 0.14 3.67 P-40 71.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 675.45 5,068.16 5.068.03 0.13 1.79 P-41 336.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 675.44 5,068.03 5,067.60 0.43 1.28 P-43 149.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 429.92 5,067.05 5,066.96 0.09 0.58 P-44 63.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.351 Open 1 429.9215,066.961 5,066.921 0.041 0.66 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybernet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 8 • Scenarsax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-46 114.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 222.24 5.066.74 5.066.72 0.02 0.17 P-47 270.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 222.24 5,066.72 5,066.67 0.05 0.20 P-48 49.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 5.068.30 5,068.30 0.00 0.00 P-49 409.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.56 Open 195.70 5,068.16 5,067.73 0.43 1.04 P-50 26.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.09e-3 5,068.03 5,068.03 0.00 0.00 P-51 26.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.09e-3 5,066.96 5,066.96 0.00 0.00 P-52 26.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.28 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.72 5,066.72 0.00 0.00 P-53 648.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.20 Open 288.12 4,899.21 4,899.02 0.19 0.29 P-54 600.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 288.11 4.899.02 4.898.85 0.17 0.28 P-55 598.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 288.11 4,898.85 4.898.68 0.17 0.28 P-56 420.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 155.93 4,898.68 4,898.41 0.27 0.65 P-57 383.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 155.93 4.898.41 4,898.37 0.04 0.10 P-59 569.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 84.04 4.898.35 4,898.33 0.02 0.03 P-60 162.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.45 Open 4.09e-3 4,898.33 4.898.33 0.00 0.00 P-61 18.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 4.09e-3 4.899.02 4.899.02 0.00 0.00 P-62 18.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 0.00 4,898.85 4,898.85 0.00 0.00 P-63 18.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 4.09e-3 4,898.41 4,898.41 0.00 0.00 P-64 19.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 0.00 4,898.35 4,898.35 0.00 0.00 P-65 100.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 513.56 5,066.61 5.066.53 0.09 0.85 P-67 135.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.10 Open -136.69 5,066.41 5.066.42 0.01 0.07 P-68 649.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.20 Open -136.69 5,066.42 5.066.40 0.04 0.06 P-69 259.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.20 Open -136.69 5,066.46 5,066.48 0.02 0.06 P-70 415.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.49 Open -136.69 5,066.48 5,066.51 0.03 0.07 P-71 145.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 129.73 5.066.52 5,066.51 0.01 0.06 P-72 43.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 90.25 5.066.51 5.066.51 1.46e-3 0.03 P-73 1,028.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.20 Open -39.48 5,066.51 5.066.51 0.01 i0.01 P-74 1.252.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -4.08e-3 5,066.51 5,066.51 0.00 0.00 P-75 330.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.45 Open 288.14 5,066.92 5,066.82 0.10 0.30 P-76 646.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.45 Open 190.92 5,066.82 5,066.74 0.08 0.13 P-77 1.311.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -97.22 5,066.51 5,066.82 0.32 0.24 P-78 62.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.95 Open -80.78 5,065.52 5,065.54 0.02 0.37 P-79 94.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -80.78 5,065.54 5.065.57 0.02 0.26 P-82 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -172.11 5,065.93 5,065.98 0.05 1.15 P-84 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.89 Open -202.66 5,066.29 5,066.34 0.05 1.91 P-86 100.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -147.77 5,066.59 5,066.66 0.07 0.70 P-89 160.00 8.01 Ductile Iron 130.01 false 0.74 Open -219.55 5.067.10 5.067.30 0.20 1.24 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 11 • • • Scena,f,o: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-91 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.63 Open -164.29 5,067.53 5,067.60 0.07 1.04 P-92 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -195.70 5,067.30 5,067.60 0.30 0.95 P-93 106.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open -195.70 5,067.60 5.067.73 0.13 1.24 P-94 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.85 5,066.85 0.00 0.00 P-95 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.59 5,066.59 0.00 0.00 P-96 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open 4.08e-3 5.066.34 5.066.34 0.00 0.00 P-97 321.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 4.08e-3 5.065.93 5,065.93 0.00 0.00 • P-98 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 39.55 5,067.05 5,067.05 3.91e-3 0.06 P-99 360.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 39.55 5,067.05 5,067.03 0.02 0.05 P-100 159.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 140.77 5,067.03 5,066.94 0.09 0.57 P-101 201.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 140.77 5,066.94 5,066.83 0.11 0.55 P-102 314.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 146.23 5,066.83 5,066.65 0.18 0.57 P-103 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 146.23 5.066.65 5,066.61 0.04 0.84 P-104 360.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.88 Open 98.64 5,066.61 5.066.51 0.10 0.28 P-106 291.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -101.22 5,067.03 5,067.12 0.09 0.30 P-109 344.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -38.43 5,066.83 5.066.85 0.02 0.05 P-111 344.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 13.73 5,066.59 5,066.59 4.88e-4 1.42e-3 P-112 234.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.15 Open 98.64 5,066.51 5,066.44 0.08 0.33 P-114 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 141.78 5,066.92 5,066.87 0.05 0.97 P-115 374.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 68.80 5,066.87 5,066.82 0.05 0.14 P-116 178.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.82 5.066.82 0.00 0.00 P-117 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -31.32 5,066.74 5,066.74 2.93e-3 0.05 P-119 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 4.08e-3 5,066.74 5.066.74 0.00 0.00 P-120 504.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 72.98 5,066.87 5,066.79 0.08 0.16 • P-122 247.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 68.80 5,066.82 5,066.78 0.04 0.15 P-124 271.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 21.05 5,066.75 5.066.74 4.39e-3 0.02 P-125 223.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 18.40 5,066.74 5,066.74 2.93e-3 0.01 P-127 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 187.35 4,899.49 4,899.44 0.04 1.87 P-128 336.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 147.53 4,899.44 4,899.25 0.19 0.57 P-129 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 147.53 4,899.25 4,899.22 0.03 1.16 P-130 380.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 99.46 4,899.22 4,899.12 0.10 0.27 P-131 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 99.46 4,899.12 4,899.11 0.01 0.53 P-132 269.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.48 Open 64.57 4,899.11 4,899.07 0.03 0.13 P-133 284.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.00 Open 33.90 4,899.07 4.899.06 0.01 0.04 P-134 62.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 33.90 4,899.06 4,899.06 2.93e-3 0.05 P-135 332.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 1 130.0 false 1.67 Open 4.08e-3 4,899.06 4,899.061 0.001 0.00 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 8 • Scena&ax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-136 385.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.41 Open -84.87 4.899.16 4,899.25 0.08 0.21 P-138 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 68.41 4,899.25 4.899.23 0.01 0.25 P-139 314.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 68.41 4,899.23 4,899.19 0.04 0.14 P-140 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 92.88 4,899.19 4,899.18 0.02 0.36 P-143 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 43.23 4,899.06 4,899.06 3.91e-3 0.08 P-145 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.14 Open 4.08e-3 4,899.04 4.899.04 0.00 0.00 P-149 263.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.12 Open -30.88 4.899.06 4.899.07 0.01 0.03 P-151 413.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.42 Open -33.89 4,899.04 4,899.06 0.02 0.04 P-153 385.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -10.45 4,899.06 4.899.06 1.95e-3 0.01 P-156 19.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.85 Open 77.25 4,899.10 4,899.10 0.01 0.33 P-157 402.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.52 Open 111.01 4,899.11 4.898.97 0.15 0.36 P-159 421.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open 20.73 4.898.93 4.898.92 0.01 0.02 P-160 109.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 20.73 4.898.92 4.898.92 1.95e-3 0.02 P-161 283.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 5.06 4,898.92 4,898.92 4.88e-4 1.73e-3 P-162 484.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.29 Open -11.53 4,898.92 4,898.92 4.88e-4 1.01e-3 P-163 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -11.53 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-164 501.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.88 Open -6.24 4,898.92 4,898.92 2.44e-3 4.87e-3 P-165 385.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.48 Open -0.58 4,898.92 4.898.92 9.77e-4 2.54e-3 P-173 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 16.59 4,898.92 4,898.92 4.88e-4 0.01 P-176 337.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -5.30 4,898.92 4,898.92 4.88e-4 1.45e-3 P-178 445.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.74 Open -85.67 4.898.94 4.899.03 0.09 0.21 P-179 40.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -5.65 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-182 104.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.52. Open -81.05 4,898.99 4.899.02 0.03 0.27 P-183 66.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 84.04 4,898.33 4,898.31 0.02 0.33 P-186 478.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.09 Open -2.76 4.898.26 4.898.26 0.00 0.00 P-191 336.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -72.03 4,898.31 4,898.36 0.05 0.16 P-193 35.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.70 Open 111.33 4,898.36 4,898.38 0.02 0.46 P-195 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -132.18 4,898.63 4,898.68 0.05 0.75 P-196 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 40.01 4,898.37 4,898.37 0.01 0.08 P-197 330.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 40.01 4,898.37 4,898.35 0.02 0.05 P-198 65.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 58.45 4,898.35 4,898.34 0.01 0.14 P-200 181.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open 4.08e-3 4.898.28 4.898.28 0.00 0.00 P-202 25.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 4.37 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-203 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 12.30 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-205 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iron . 130.0 false 1.24 Open 41.04 4,898.94 4.898.93 2.44e-3 0.10 P-208 1 24.00 8.01 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1 1.491 Open -34.30 4.898.931 4,898.94 1.95e-3 0.08 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrtnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM 0 Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 8 Scenes..o: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-209 355.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 511.15 5,067.60 5,067.30 0.30 0.83 P-210 355.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 469.47 5,067.30 5,067.05 0.25 0.71 P-211 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.67 Open 41.67 5,067.30 5,067.30 0.01 0.08 P-212 388.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 855.92 4,902.24 4,901.47 0.77 1.98 P-213 369.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 851.32 4,901.47 4,900.74 0.73 1.97 P-214 169.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open -80.78 5,065.57 5,065.60 0.04 0.21 P-215 150.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open -124.18 5,065.60 5,065.67 0.07 0.48 • P-216 204.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -124.18 5,065.67 5,065.76 0.09 0.44 P-217 204.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -172.11 5,065.76 5.065.93 0.16 0.80 P-218 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -172.11 5,065.98 5,066.11 0.13 0.83 P-219 160.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -202.66 5,066.11 5,066.29 0.18 1.13 P-220 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open -144.82 5,066.34 5,066.45 0.11 0.64 P-221 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open -161.50 5,066.45 5,066.59 0.14 0.78 P-222 130.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.13 Open -147.77 5,066.66 5,066.75 0.08 0.65 P-223 130.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.13 Open -164.44 5,066.75 5,066.85 0.10 0.79 P-224 121.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -202.88 5,066.85 5,066.99 0.13 1.11 P-225 80.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -219.55 5,066.99 5,067.10 0.11 1.39 P-226 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -145.89 5,067.30 5,067.40 0.10 0.57 P-227 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.74 Open -164.29 5,067.40 5,067.53 0.13 0.71 P-228' 69.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -101.22 5,067.12 5,067.15 0.03 0.45 P-229 350.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -122.04 5,067.15 5,067.30 0.15 0.42 P-230 291.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -5.46 5,066.83 5.066.83 0.00 0.00 P-231 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -38.43 5,066.83 5,066.83 0.01 0.07 P-232 286.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 47.58 5,066.61 5,066.59 0.02 0.07 P-233 80,00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 13.73 5,066.59 5,066.59 0.00 0.00 P-234 238.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 98.64 5,066.44 5,066.36 0.07 0.30 P-235 238.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 57.84 5,066.36 5,066.34 0.03 0.11 P-236 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 72.98 5,066.79 5,066.78 0.02 0.26 P-237 410.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 49.53 5,066.78 5,066.74 0.03 0.08 P-238 182.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 18.20 5,066.74 5.066.74 1.95e-3 0.01 P-239 191.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open -2.65 5,066.74 5,066.74 0.00 0.00 P-240 217.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 68.80 5,066.78 5,066.75 0.03 0.14 P-241 233.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 21.05 5,066.75 5,066.75 3.91e-3 0.02 P-242 325.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.08 Open 9.51 4,899.04 4,899.04 9.77e-4 3.0e-3 P-243 67.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.08 Open -33.89 4,899.04 4,899.04 3.91e-3 0.06 P-244 84.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.01 false 1 3.06 J Open 1 -17.05 4,899.03 J 4,899.03 1 1.46e-3 1 0.02 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrrnstr.wcd Morrison-Malerie,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 8 Scena,Oax Day • • Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check ' Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-245 301.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -26.77 4,899.03 4.899.04 0.01 0.03 P-246 157.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 43.23 4,899.06 4,899.05 0.01 0.07 P-247 157.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 36.28 4,899.05 4.899.04 0.01 0.05 P-248 226.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -3.75 4.899.06 4,899.06 0.00 0.00 P-249 92.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -30.68 4,899.06 4,899.06 3.42e-3 0.04 P-250 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open 56.88 4,899.10 4,899.08 0.02 0.11 P-251 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.78 Open 49.93 4,899.08 4,899.06 0.02 0.09 P-252 249.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -11.44 4,899.10 4,899.10 9.77e-4 3.92e-3 P-253 249.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -34.89 4,899.10 4.899.11 0.01 0.04 P-254 84.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -22.08 4,899.08 4,899.09 1.95e-3 0.02 P-255 301.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.06 Open -31.81 4,899.09 4,899.10 0.01 0.04 P-256 163.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 92.88 4,899.18 4,899.13 0.04 0.26 P-257 163.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 77.25 4,899.13 4,899.10 0.03 0.19 P-258 246.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.34 Open -24.47 4,899.19 4,899.20 0.01 0.02 P-259 341.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 3.34 Open -48.07 4,899.20 4.899.22 0.03 0.08 P-260 253.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 139.72 4,899.11 4,899.10 0.02 0.07 P-261 253.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 117.14 4,899.10 4,899.08 0.01 0.05 P-262 272.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -153.28 4,899.25 4,899.43 0.18 0.67 P-263 312.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -39.82 4,899.43 4,899.44 0.02 0.05 P-264 193.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.37 Open 234.23 4.900.02 4,899.70 0.32 1.67 P-265 196.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.37 Open 187.35 4,899.70 4,899.49 0.21 1.09 P-266 328.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 492.18 4,899.69 4,899.43 0.26 0.78 P-267 328.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.10 Open 453.98 4,899.43 4,899.21 0.22 0.67 P-268 78.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 111.01 4,898.97 4,898.93 0.03 0.42 P-269 392.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 20.73 4,898.93 4.898.93 0.01 0.01 • P-270 237.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 15.67 '4,898.92 4,898.92 1.46e-3 0.01 P-271 223.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 4.37 4,898.92 4,898.92 4.88e-4 2.19e-3 P-272 276.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open 9.72 4,898.92 4,898.92 9.77e-4 3.54e-3 P-273 .65.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.54 Open 0.00 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-274 156.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 12.30 4,898.92 4.898.92 9.77e-4 0.01 P-275 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open 5.35 4,898.92 4,898.92 4.88e-4 2.71e-3 P-276 277.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open 16.59 4,898.92 4,898.92 2.93e-3 0.01 P-277 293.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -12.06 4,898.92 4,898.92 1.46e-3 5.0e-3 P-278 285.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.94 Open 9.73 4,898.92 4,898.92 9.77e-4 3.43e-3 P-279 55.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.94 Open 4.09e-3 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-280 168.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 41.04 4,898.93 4,898.93 0.01 0.06 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 8 • Scen.._-o. Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-281 168.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open 34.09 4,898.93 4,898.92 0.01 0.04 P-282 77.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -5.30 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-283 296.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -39.15 4,898.92 4,898.94 0.02 0.05 P-284 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open 3.71 4,898.94 4,898.94 9.77e-4 0.01 P-285 180.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.28 Open -5.49 4,898.94 4,898.94 9.77e-4 0.01 P-286 306.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -5.65 4,898.92 4,898.92 0.00 0.00 P-287 228.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -34.30 4,898.92 4,898.93 0.01 0.04 P-288 291.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -71.85 4.898.94 4,898.98 0.04 0.15 P-289 50.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -81.05 4,898.98 4,898.99 0.01 0.28 P-290 148.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -12.73 4,898.93 4,898.93 4.88e-4 3.3e-3 P-291 217.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -33.83 4,898.93 4,898.94 0.01 0.04 P-292 212.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -0.58 4.898.92 4,898.93 4.88e-4 2.3e-3 P-293 281.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -12.73 4,898.93 4,898.93 9.77e-4 3.48e-3 P-294 300.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -111.33 4,898.38 4,898.49 0.11 0.36 P-295 281.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.89 Open -132.18 4,898.49 4,898.63 0.14 0.51 P-296 188.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -18.44 4,898.35 4,898.35 2.44e-3 0.01 P-297 188.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.02 Open -39.29 4,898.35 4,898.36 0.01 0.06 P-298 466.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.69 Open -23.41 4,898.2E 4,898.29 0.01 0.02 P-299 79.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.69 Open -72.03 4.898.29 4,898.31 0.02 0.21 P-300 331.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open 58.45 4,898.34 4,898.31 0.03 0.10 P-301 391.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open 44.55 4,898.31 4,898.28 0.02 0.06 P-302 153.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -4.31 4,898.28 4,898.28 0.00 0.00 P-303 63.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.24 Open -23.41 4.898.28 4,898.28 1.46e-3 0.02 P-304 169.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -24.56 4,898.27 4,898.27 3.91e-3 0.02 • P-305 166.00 6.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.49 Open -48.86 4.898.27 4,898.28 0.01 0.08 P-306 224.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -2.76 4,898.26 4,898.26 4.88e-4 2.18e-3 P-307 221.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -24.56 4,898.26 4,898.27 4.39e-3 0.02 P-308 257.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 21.54 4.898.26 4,898.26 3.91e-3 0.02 P-309 322.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open -2.76 4,898.26 4,898.26 0.00 0.00 P-310 197.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 84.04 4,898.31 4,898.27 0.04 0.21 P-311 198.00 8.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.09 Open 21.54 4,898.27 4,898.26 3.42e-3 0.02 P-312 277.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 115.92 4,898.37 4,898.36 0.02 0.06 P-313 322.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 1.80 Open 84.04 4,898.36 4,898.35 0.01 0.03 P-314 580.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.90 Open 222.24 5,066.67 5,066.56 0.11 0.19 P-315 580.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 2.90 Open 129.74 5,066.56 5,066.52 0.04 0.07 P-316 1 440.00 12.01 Ductile Iron J 130.01 false J 0.00 Open 1 90.25 5.066.51 5,066.501 0.011 0.03 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 8 Scena►,•lax Day • Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharge Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficient (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-317 434.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 4.08e-3 5.066.50 5.066.50 0.00 0.00 P-318 154.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open 513.56 5.066.53 5.066.40 0.12 0.81 P-319 154.00 12.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.35 Open -136.69 5,066.40 5,066.41 0.01 0.07 P-320 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 775.11 4,755.10 4,755.10 0.00 0.00 P-321 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 871.15 4,782.80 4,782.80 0.00 0.00 P-322 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 513.56 4.810.40 4,810.40 0.00 0.00 P-323 1 357.001 8.01 Ductile Iron 1 130.01 false 1 0.00 1 Open 1 -124.90 4,899.431 4,899.561 0.141 0.38 • • Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Malerle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerie,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:56:12 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 8 of 8 • Scen....,o: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Valve Report Label Elevation Diameter Minor Control Discharge From To Headloss (ft) (in) Loss Status (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) Coefficient (ft) (ft) PRV-1 4,752.00 8.0 10.00 Throttling 855.88 5,065.38 4,902.24 163.14 PRV-2 4,776.00 8.0 0.00 Closed 0.00 4.899.021 5,066.67 0.00 • Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer.Morrison-Maierte Inc. h:�338410031acad\waterlcybemetkcybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:57:33 AM O Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scena Max Day • • Fire Flow Analysis Pump Report Label Elevation Pump Shutoff Shutoff Design Design Maximum Maximum Control Intake Discharge Discharge Pump Calculated (ft) Power Head Discharge Head Discharge Operating Operating Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Water (Hp) (ft) (gpm) (ft) (gpm) Head Discharge Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (gpm) (ft) (ft) (Hp) PMP-1 4,755.00 346.50 0.00 300.30 916.34 231.00 1.502.96 On 4,755.10 5,067.71 775.11 312.61 61.18 PMP-2 4,782.70 323.40 0.00 277.00 1,000.87 231.00 1,455.23 On 4,782.801 5,070.26 871.15 287.46 63.22 PMP-3 1 4,810.301 1 265.651 0.001 2310011.036.47 161.701 1,875.861 On 1 4,810.401 5,066.611 513.561 256.211 33,22 • Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrMstr.wcd Morrison-Malerle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5[4.5015c] 11/13/01 11:57:45 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Scenario: Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Reservoir Report Label Elevation Zone Inflow Calculated (ft) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (h) R-1 4,810.40 Zone-1 -513.56 4,810.40 R-2 4,782.80 Zone-1 -871.15 4,782.80 R-3 1 4,755.10 Zone-1 -775.11 4,755.10 Title:Valley West Water Master Plan Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc. h:\3384\003\acad\water\cybemet\cybrmstr.wcd Morrison-Maierle,Inc. WaterCAD v4.5(4.5015c) 11/13/01 11:58:02 AM ©Haestad Methods.Inc. 37 8rookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • 27 • DESIGN REPORT FOR THE SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS IN VALLEY WEST MASTER PLAN AREA BOZEMAN, MONTANA • Prepared By: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Boulevard P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1113 Date: November 16, 2001 File: 3384.003/040/0310 • VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 1 VALLEY WEST WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary.................................................................................... Page 4 2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................. Page 4 3.0 Pre-Analysis................................................................................................ Page 5 4.0 Predicted Average Daily Sewage Generation............................................. Page 5 5.0 Peak Flows ................................................................................................. Page 6 6.0 Lift Station................................................................................................... Page 7 7.0 Wastewater Treatment................................................................................ Page 7 8.0 Conclusion .................................................................................................. Page 7 LIST OF TABLES • Table 1 Drainage Basin Summary ......................................... Page 5 Table 2 Average Daily Flows ................................................ Page 5 Table 3 Peak Hour Flows .................................................... Page 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Existing and Proposed Sewer Facilities for Valley West Subdivision VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS • DESIGN REPORT Page 2 • LIST OF REFERENCES Wastewater Facility Plan Bozeman, Montana -August 1998 MSE-HKM Engineering Valley West Annexation Sewer Main Extension Design report June1998 City of Bozeman, Design Standards and Specifications Policy July 2001 • • VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 3 VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSION • DESIGN REPORT This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to Sewage Disposal. 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of the following discussion is to provide a basis for design and review of the proposed Valley West Master Planned area sewer collection system. Aspen Enterprises LLC. is proposing to develop approximately 310 acres, consisting of 10 residential phases to create as many as 1436 dwelling units and three neighborhood commercial phases along with parks and open space areas. This project is located in the 406-acre Valley West Annexation, which is located west of Ferguson Avenue and south of Durston Road. As part the Valley West annexation process the City of Bozeman's sewer system was extended into the project area, from connections near the intersection of Oak Street and North 27' Avenue. The sewer system extension consisted of approximately 16,500 feet of eight inch to twenty one inch sewer mains. The trunk mains installed with the Valley West Annexation in conjunction with the existing • trunk lines between the project and the treatment plant have adequate capacity for the wastewater generated by the proposed development. Aspen Enterprises', Valley West project will extend the City of Bozeman's sewer system throughout the project to provide service within the project. 2.0 Introduction The sewer collection system consists of an extension of the City of Bozeman's sewer system. Connection to the existing collection system will occur at several locations along the sewer main extensions completed for the Valley West Annexation. The locations in which the connections.will occur are on West Babcock Street, Cottonwood Road and Durston Road. 3.0 Pre-Analysis Before the analysis can begin, foundational data is acquired regarding variables such as average daily flows, existing conditions, pipe materials, elevations and VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS •. DESIGN REPORT Page 4 • relative location of all other appurtenant components. Once the information is determined an overall analysis of the system can be completed. The next few sections explain the method for determining and or calculating the data required to evaluate the sewer system for Valley West Subdivision. 4.0 Predicted Average Daily Sewage Generation The planned unit development includes 1,436 residential units to be constructed in multiple phases over the next ten years. The project is divided into five areas for the purposes of analyzing the flows generated from the development and the relation of those flows to the capacity of the existing system. The five drainage zones are shown on the attached figure and summarized below: Table 1 Drainage Basin Summary Drainage Basin Estimated Residential Units Area (acres) Area 1 414 50 Area 2 173 30 Area 3 260 55 Area 4 287 83 Area 5 302 90 • Total 1,436 308 The City of Bozeman's design standards require that an average daily flow rate of 72 gallons per capita per day be utilized for base flows and that an additional infiltration flow of 150 gallons per acre per day should be utilized for design. A population of 2.5 people per dwelling unit is utilized. The following table summarizes the average daily flow predicted for the project: Table 2 Average Daily Flows Average Total Drainage Residential Daily Sewage Area Infiltration Average Basin Units Flow (acres) (gpd) Daily Flow (gpd) (gpd) 1 414 74520 50 7,500 82,020 2 173 31140 30 4,500 35,640 3 260 46800 55 8,250 55,050 4 287 51660 83 12,450 64,110 5 302 54360 90 13,500 67,860 Total 1436 258480 308 46,200 304,680 • VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 5 In summary the total flow from the project is estimated to be approximately • 305,000 gallons per day of which 260,000 is wastewater and 46,000 is infiltration. This results in an average daily flow of 211 gallons per minute. 5.0 Peak Flows In estimating the peak hour flows for the project, the standard peaking formula adopted by the city is utilized. The formula utilized is as follows: PF = 18 + SIP 4 + SIP Where P = population in thousands In accordance with methodology presented in the Wastewater Facility Plan the peaking factor is applied only to the sewage flow and not to the flow attributable to infiltration. Based on the predicted populations the peak flows for the 5 basins are summarized below: Table 3 Peak Hour Flows • Drainage Basin Peaking Factor Peak Flow (qpm) Area 1 3.8 216 Area 2 4.0 99 Area 3 3.9 149 Area 4 3.9 174 Area 5 3.9 184 The peak flows for each of the basins will be directed towards the existing trunk sewer line system. The mains to be installed with the development will vary in size from eight to ten inches based on the final layout of the project and the design pipe grades. Drainage Basins 2 through 5 flow into existing lines that are 10" in diameter or larger. These lines have more than adequate capacity for the peak flows identified above. Drainage Basin 1 flows into a 8" main in Durston Road with a full flow capacity of approximately 340 gallons per minute. The peak 216 gallon per minute flow VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS • DESIGN REPORT Page 6 s s • from this project is approximately 60% of the capacity of the pipe. As such adequate capacity is available. 6.0 Lift Station A lift station is required to serve a majority of Wastewater Drainage Area 5 due to the topography of the site. The lift station will be designed to standards adopted by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality in addition to any requirements of the city. The applicant proposes that the lift station be operated and maintained by the City of Bozeman. If the city desires to fund the cost of the operation and maintenance of the lift station outside of the normal wastewater funding mechanisms,the applicant is interested in exploring the creation of a local maintenance district or other similar mechanism to provide funding for this facility. 7.0 Wastewater Treatment The wastewater from the Valley West Planned Unit Development will be conveyed to the City of Bozeman's Wastewater Treatment Plant located near the intersection of Springhill Road and Moss Bridge Road. The wastewater treatment plant has adequate capacity for the proposed development as outlined in the City's • Wastewater Facility Plan. 8.0 Conclusion The sewage collection system for the Valley West Planned Unit Development in conjunction with existing City of Bozeman facilities will provide for the collection and treatment of wastewater in accordance with state and local requirements. H:\3384\003\DOCS\DZNRPTS.DOC • VALLEY WEST SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS DESIGN REPORT Page 7 SANITARY SEWAGE LFr kFoRCE,M2AI . STATION . • •• • • ••A. (MAJOR _ 7 — O r.- 77 i � P Y - 'rill I Nil MISON VALLEY WEST S r I1 • t _ Ij ERLE,iNc. DUSTING " • '• 1 a _ -. PLOTTED DATE--•.• ,. •• DRAMNG NAME: \ .� is Solid Waste This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to Solid Waste Disposal. Solid waste generated by the project can be collected by a combination of municipal and private collection services. The selection of providers of the service will be based on customer preference, either the City of Bozeman Sanitation Department or BFI Waste Services. Regardless of the provider of the collection services, solid waste will be disposed of at the City of Bozeman Landfill. A letter for BFI Waste Services indicating their ability to provide service to the area is included. at the end of this section. This method of solid waste disposal will comply with the standards of the State of Montana Department of Environmental Quality. • 1 �..,� MO�sON ENGINEERS I� SCIENTISTS i ''�M{�� lv SURVEYORS INC. PLANNERS MMERLE, I 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113•BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 •FAX:406-587-1176 • An Employee-Owned Company October 29,2001 BFI Harry Kirschenbaum P.O.Box 10730 Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Kirschenbaum: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Site Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial Uuse areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. D In addition to any comments you may have on the project, we are inquiring specifically about your company's ability to provide service to the proposed project and your estimation of the primary landfill that would receive the solid waste. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact me at'406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morris n-Maierle,Inc. Greg Straoon,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures Cc: File • H:\3384\003\Corresp\SolidwastelO-26-Ol.doc "Providing resources.in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" 11/05/2001 MON 04:26 FAX U 002/002 • Waste Services November 5, 2001 Morrison Maierle, Inc. Greg Stratton 901 Technology Blvd. P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman,MT 59771 RE: Valley West PUD, Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dcar Mr. Stratton: BFI Waste Services provides both residential and commercial garbage collection in and around the area surrounding the proposed Valley West PUD. We foresee no difficulty in providing this service within this new devclopment. Sincerely, Harry Kirschenbaum Marketing Director • 29 f sz o m 8 Z m 1 Streets and Roads This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Code Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations Section 16.18.030 relative to Streets and Roads. Description: Ferguson Avenue, Babcock Street, and the west half of Cottonwood Road are constructed and in use by the public. Durston Road is constructed to County paved standards between Ferguson Road and Cottonwood Road, and County gravel standards west of Cottonwood Road. These improvements are illustrated on the exhibit entitled "Valley West Subdivision Available Street Facilities" included with the site plan information. A detailed description of these streets is included in the "Traffic Impact Study — Valley West Planned Unit Development Subdivision" included with submittal. Excellent access to the area's collector and arterial street system is provided the site by virtue of its location adjacent to these roadways. City streets within 60-foot rights-of-way and improved alleys will provide access to dwellings within the planned unit development. The street standards adopted by the City Commission through their approval of the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update will be used. In general, a 33-foot back of curb to back of curb street section will be used. In areas designated as • pedestrian corridors (where streets line up with parkways) a 31-foot street section will be used. Alleys in the interior portions of the subdivision will provide a 14-foot wide paved travel way within a 20-foot alley right-of-way. Alleys for dwellings facing the arterial and collector streets surrounding the development (Ferguson Ave, Babcock St., Cottonwood Road, and Durston Road) will provide a 16-foot paved travel way within a 30-foot alley right-of-way. The paved surface will be necessary in the alleys because in most cases they will provide primary access to the dwellings facing the streets. Typical road and alley sections are illustrated on the exhibit entitled "Valley West Subdivision — Road Sections". The exhibit entitled "Valley West Subdivision — Internal Access Roads" illustrates locations for the specific road sections. A variance from the standard street section for local streets identified in Table 1A - the Minimum Street Standard for City Streets in section 16.16.070 of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations is included in the section entitled Variance Requests. Access to Arterials: Individual lots in general will not access directly to the arterial streets or roads. There will be instances in the higher density areas where an access easement is provided from the arterials to serve more than one lot. The purpose will be to provide access to parking facilities behind the structures. In these instances additional access will be provided by virtue of alleys at the rear of the lots. With the exception of access to the higher density areas, "no access" strips will be placed on lots fronting Babcock Street, Ferguson • Avenue, Cottonwood Road, and Durston Road. Alleys to the rear of the lot will access homes in lower density areas fronting these streets. A variance request 1 is included at the end of this section requesting a variance from the requirements of Section 16.14.020 providing for frontage on a public street or road. The Montana Department of Transportation has been sent a letter requesting their input regarding the proposed subdivision. The response letter, attached on the following pages, indicates that MDT is generally satisfied that the major traffic issues that would impact MDT have been dealt with by the proposed mitigation. Modifications to Existing Streets and Roads: Modifications to Durston Road and Cottonwood Road will be made during individual phases of the project. Planned projects on the Cottonwood Road corridor are the installation of a traffic signal at the Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane intersection, and construction of the northbound traffic lanes from West Babcock to Durston Road. The Applicant is interested in working with the City and other owners in the area to construct the northbound lanes between West Babcock and Huffine Lane at the same time as either or both of the projects referenced above. Funding for these projects will likely come from a combination of private funds and the creation of an SID. Preliminary planning for the projects will commence immediately, but it is likely a funding scenario will not be finalized until the projects are ready,for construction. Details regarding the improvements to Cottonwood Road are provided in the "Traffic Impact Study — Valley West Planned Unit Development", which was presented earlier. Durston Road will also need improvement. The City is currently making efforts to • create a special improvement district to improve Durston Road to a three lane minor arterial from North 19t' Avenue to Fowler Road extended. The owners of the Valley West PUD are bound by existing waivers of right-to-protest creation of an SID for improvements to portions of Durston Road. Funding for future improvements to Durston Road, from Fowler Road to the west, will likely come from a combination of private funds and the creation of an SID. Preliminary Planning for the overall Durston Road improvements is underway. Details regarding the improvements to Durston Road are provided in the "Traffic Impact Study". The section in this application entitled "Durston Road" also deals with this issue in more detail. Minor modifications will also be necessary to the remaining existing arterials surrounding the project, Cottonwood Road, Babcock Street, and Ferguson Avenue. These modifications are related to the construction of intersections with internal subdivision streets. This will entail cutting the existing curb, gutter, and asphalt, and installing new curb radiuses and pavement to match the asphalt of the existing street. In cases, the cuts will be slightly more intensive in order to connect to existing water mains. Street cut permits will be required for these activities and will be submitted with individual subdivision applications. The street cut permits for the Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 are included at the end of this section. • 2 • Additionally a pedestrian crossing is proposed to connect the subdivision across Cottonwood Road. A detail illustrating the crossing is included in this Section. Dust: All streets will be paved to provide long-term dust control. Dust created during construction will be controlled in accordance with the Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. Dust in gravel alleys will not be a concern. Dust in the alleys will be effectively controlled by low traffic volumes and low speeds. Pollution and Erosion: Surface drainage is shown on the preliminary grading and drainage plan. Surface runoff will be treated by on-site detention/retention . facilities. Erosion control plans will be prepared with the construction documents. All erosion control plans will be in accordance with state and local regulations. A permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity will be required by MDEQ for all phases of the project. Construction sediment will be controlled in accordance with the standard practices described in the Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Handbook. Installation and Maintenance: The applicant will pay for construction of all streets and alleys within the subdivision. Funding possibilities for improvements to Cottonwood Road and Durston Road were discussed earlier in this section and in • the section entitled Durston Road. All maintenance for public streets will be by the City of Bozeman. Gravel alleys will also be periodically graded as part of the City's annual maintenance program. Maintenance in paved alleys will be the responsibility of the homeowner's association for items such as snow removal, cleaning, and weed control. Major maintenance items such as asphalt repairs will need to be addressed by the homeowner's association, as they are needed. Traffic Generation: The Traffic Impact Study for the subdivision addressed traffic generation. The traffic study was presented earlier. 3 Durston Road (tAinor Arterial) DURSTON PARKWAY PRIVATE OWNERSHIP HERITAGE CHRISTIAN I SCHOOL SOCCER FIELDS u Jum�rr TWS M 9E XTRYMro Toole S- ImM AM MIMC P20PERR' C-Eft M MIME PllSES. } I t �I V i 0 Cascade I ® =777i K PARKWAY I N C ® t PARKI PARK z a W= West Babcock 00 O o �0 2O� Street (Minor Arterial) o Q 03 c . W W W 0 Q I m a D: x 00 0 � o U U m 3 a ch W W c m m oa` db °" LEGEND: 31' ROADWAY VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISON 33' ROADWAY INTERNAL ACCESS ROADS NoTEs: 35' ROADWAY - 1. SEE ROAD/ALLEY SECTIONS FOR DETAILS OF ROADS AND ALLEYS. s 14' PAVED ALLEY rr.% ffi t MORRISON VALLEY WEST MAIERLE,iNc. SUBDIVISION 16' PAVED ALLEY INTERNAL ACCESS ROADS ASPEN ENTERPRISES CLIENT: y FIELD WORK DATE:9/10/02 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/18/2002 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE:NTS H:\3M4\003\.cw\"STERPLM\ROADLECCNDd.g.d.9 CHECKED BY:G_ S PROJ y:338a.003 SHEET _I OF I i 1.00' 0.50' 0.50' 1.00' 5.00' 8.50' 7.00' 8.00' 8.00' 7.00' 1 5.50' S.00' 1. SIDEWALK BOULEVARD PARKING DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE PARKING BOULEVARD SIDEWALK i i I 31.00'BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB 2 LANE ROAD SIDEWALKS/PARKING/BOULEVARD BOTH SIDES 1.00' 0.50' 0.50' 1.00' s.00' Aso' �.00' s.00' s.00' �.00' �� �.so' s.00' SIDEWALK BOULEVARD PARKING DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE PARKING BOULEVARD SIDEWALK I I -! ! 33.00' BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB 2 LANE ROAD SIDEWALKS/PARKING/BOULEVARD BOTH SIDES VALLEY WEST S UBDIVISON ROAD SECTIONS JIM MORRISON VALLEY WEST • MAIERLE INC. PRELIMINARY PLAN A M 11131b,rw Y TYs�Yl bPi•Is6 TaI9KT �_,a,sT-Tm ROAD SECTIONS it CLIENT•ASPEN ENTERPRISES I PLAITED DATE: Nov/14/2001 ' FlELD WORK DATE:11/73/01 I; DRAWN 781 BY: TODD SCALE:NTS DRAWING NAME: N:\) \OOJ\AGO\CONCEPT\R6AD SECIWNS.Arq CHECKED BY-_GJSS PROJ g338a.003.050.03IDSHEET OF 1 I 7.00' 7.00' f I 3.00' DRNING LANE DRIVING LANE 3.00' i I I i 2% 2% 20.00' EDGE OF ALLEY TO EDGE OF ALLEY I 14' PAVED ALLEY 7.00' O O 7.00 DRIVING LANE DRIVING ij i II k i 2% 2% _ 1 Fl _i I I_I I I l I I_I I 30.00' EDGE OF ALLEY TO EDGE OF ALLEY I 16' PAVED ALLEY j VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION ALLEY SECTIONS i� j MORRISON VALLEY WEST MAIERLE Inc. PRELIMINARY PLAN ALLEY SECTIONS CLIENT:ASPEN BENT�ERPRISES a�f��' r:tw>n m-�m � FIELD WORK' DATE 11/13/O1 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/13/2002 .i DRAWN BY: TODD SCALE: DRAWING NAME: N:\sea\003\AW\C0W0Tnuav SECnows.e.9 'I CHECKED BY,.GJS PROD�3384.003.050.03 EET 1 OF 1 • 1 C 3a Z Z. nJ J w uj NO SCALE �. ` ,�� `z' G vl .% A. © t � Z' l LM �y J•Gtj �1"S 2 r� Epp ♦- •- d8 ' l'�' . e= r� -tee- '�� � I,c`P' 'r'* �a�4 c ,,•4,� -t , t,,; l BROA�DWALI� iyjk t,p 1 ,a• SD17p ._ g BRIDGE �h ,'� rl:�d�n'C'` � � 1 $m'•f °r�y $�''iar �°.,° 0 j yd t 0 ) a�f awlmo8°0�q d t - ' j1"` �`�6' � ✓- d ��. ox a w,Ec•' !f ! +fir„ � �,i' M1l'.�. '(�' i ',i rr'�' Y N .�q x°o �LL W11 .2 N. COTTONWOOD AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE 10 30 �MORRISON "�`� 9 VALLEY WEST PH 1 MAIERLESINC. N. COTTONWOOD AVE. ( IN FEET ) `a"°""--am,e.r Po On III&981,.�B4 Bmtmv.MY.59„1•rout(408)589-8721 roc N961 58,--„9 DETAIL 1 inch = 30 ft. CLIENT: (APPROXIMATE SCALE) FIELD WORK: DATE:11/16/02 PLOTTED DATE: Nov/18/2002 — 10:30:37 am DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:NO SCALE DRAWING NAME: H:\3384\003\ACAD\NCo1.a_Siaerk.a.g CHECKED BY:GS PROJ :3384.003 SHEET 1 OF i MORMSON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS l:_._• ` " SURVEYORS PNNES IYJ•r�. 1 MMERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113•BOZEMM,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 • FAX:4 6-5587.1176 • An Employee-Owned Company October 29,2061 Montana Department of Transportation Rob Bukvitch P.O.Box 1110 Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Bukvitch: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Site Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit • Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately U 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. D As part of our planning efforts for this project,we request to revisit the issues surrounding the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane. We will contact you in the near future to begin discussions. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions in the mean time,please contact me at(406) 587-0721. ..Sincerely, Morris n-Maierle,Inc. Greg Stratta,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures • Cc: File H-.\33 84\003\Corresp\4MDT i 0-26-O l.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" RECT NOV - 5 2001 Montana Department of Transportation David A.Galt,Director Govern Bozeman Area Office Martz, or 907 N Rouse Avenue PO Box 1110 • Bozeman,MT59771-1110 November 2, 2001 Greg Stratton Morrison & Maierle, Inc. P O Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 Subject: Valley West Planned Unit Development Greg, I received your letter for the above mentioned development and offer the following comments. Since this is a large development and it's accessing US 191 from several public roads, I feel this meets our system impact criteria and have forwarded your information to the • Department's Planning Office in Helena for their review. The contact person for our Planning Office is Sandra Straehl. If you need more information, her phone number is 444-7692. r7� . Douglas D. Moeller, Maintenance Chief Bozeman Maintenance Area copies: Jason Giard, Butte District Administrator Bob Fischer, Butte District Assistant Administrator Area File, Rob Bukvich • Phone. (406)586 9562 An Equal Opportunity Employer TTY.• (800)335�-7591 Fax: (406)5864201 Web Page: www.mdLstate.mt.us 30 • Utilities • This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning P q Y 9 Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to Utilities. Affected Utilities All affected publicly and privately owned utilities have been notified and provided copies of the Concept Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and Valley West Subdivision — Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. These include: • Montana Power Company (gas and electric) • Qwest Communications • TCI Cablevision Copies of the letters to each of these utilities requesting design input are included at the end of this section. Electric/Gas Montana Power Company will provide natural gas and electric service to the development. These facilities will be located in alleys and. 5-foot utility easements for individual service drops and junction boxes will be provided on the • rear of each lot. Electric and natural gas lines will be placed underground. Cable Television AT&T Broadband and Internet Service will provide cable service to the development. A letter from AT&T Cable Services indicating their ability to provide this service and identifying design considerations is included at the end of this section. Telephone service QWest Communications will provide local telephone service to the development. At the time of this submittal, a response from QWest regarding their ability to provide service had not been received. All utilities serving the development will be installed underground within alleys and utility easements provided on the plat for each individual phase of the development. Facilities will be installed concurrent with the phased development of the project. 1 • j:•4r; RRT ENGINEERS �_� �+ �° MO1�I�LSON SCIENTISTS _'` 1 SURVEYORS PNNES IOU MMERLE,iNc. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD•P.O.BOX 1113•BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 •FAX:406-5587-176 • An Employee-Owned Company October 29,2001 Scott Adolf Qwest Communications 2707 West Main Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Adolf Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Plan Application to the City of Bozeman for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and two copies of the Preliminary Plat for the Valley West Subdivision—Phase #1. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated in this document. • We are taking this opportunity to solicit comments from Qwest Communications regarding provisions for telephone service to the development. The plan is for private utilities to be located in the alleys. Please lJredline one copy of the Preliminary plat for Phase 1 with your proposed utility layout and return it to our office for incorporation into our design. Please indicate any anticipated locations for utility conduits or special easement requirements,etc. on the preliminary plat. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. The Valley West Subdivision—Phase #1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. We will be providing you with each phase as the project progresses. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions,please contact me at (406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morrison aierle,Inc. Greg Stratt ,P.E. Project En sneer Enclosures • H:\3384\003\Corresp\Qwestl0-25-01.doe "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" • t«r MORRtON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS .. PLANNERS ' MMERLE,INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD•P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406.587.0721 •FAX:406-587-1176 An Employee-Owned Company • October 29,2001 Scott Riis AT&T Broadband 511 W.Mendenhall Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Riis: Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Plan Application to the City of Bozeman for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and two copies of the Preliminary Plat for the Valley West Subdivision—Phase #1. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated in this document. We are taking this opportunity to solicit comments from AT&T Broadband regarding provisions for • Uservice to the development. The plan is for private utilities to be located in the alleys. Please redline one copy of the Preliminary plat for Phase 1 with your proposed utility layout and return it to our office for incorporation into our design. Please indicate any anticipated locations for utility conduits, or special easement requirements,etc. on the preliminary plat. D The project is planned for development over The next 8 to 10 years. The'Valley West Subdivision—Phase #1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. We will be providing you with each phase as the project progresses. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions,please contact me at (406)587-0721. Sincerely Morriso -Maierle,Inca Greg Stratt ,P.E. Project Engineer Enclosures H:\3384\003\Corresp\Qwestl0-25-01.doe • "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" REC'p Nov Rog, ANT AT&T CABLE SERVICES AT&T Broadband&Internet Servica Central Division 511 W.Mendenhall Bozeman,MT 59715 406.586-1837 FAX 406 586-6381 11-02-01 Morrison Maierle Inc. PO Bx. 1.113 Bozeman Mt.59718 RE: Valley West Subdivision • AT&T Broadband is planing on serving this Subdivision.We will Design over what Montana Power Co.designs and go into their trenches.What works for MPC will work for AT&T.MPC can get you a mark up for the culverts. Sincerely, Scott Riis Technical Operations Supervisor • �Oct (� Recycled Paper 11-14-01 ; 4: 19PM;MPC Bozeman, MT ;405 585 9634 A 1i 1 Randy Sullivan . :The Montana Power Company . Director Bozeman Division Division Operations Nov. 14, 2001 Greg Stratton Morrison-Maierle, Inc. PO Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771 Dear Greg.- Montana Power is willing and able to provide service to the Proposed Valley West Subdivision.. .These services can be provided in accordance with applicable Montana Public Services rules and regulations and the current Montana Power Company tariff schedule. Montana Power will want to determine the locations of all transformers and underground lines and equipment to provide for maintenance and installation. We also would require • all appropriate utility easements along lot lines and roads in accordance with common subdivision design practices. . Please call me if you have any questions or concerns at 582-4671, also, we would appreciate having a copy of the approved plat of this proposed area prior to providing a cost to bring in these services. Sincerely, Matt Micklewright Division Engineer Bozeman Division P.O..Box490• Bozeman,Montana 59771.0490 Telephone-888-467-2669•Faaimile:406-585-9634 31 0a. m A • O • m m 8 . z N c 3 m • 8 Emergency Services This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to Emergency Services. The City of Bozeman recently annexed the area in which the proposed Valley West Subdivision lies. Fire Protection The City of Bozeman Fire Department will provide fire protection. Response time for fire calls is estimated to be 5 to 7 minutes. The distance from the Bozeman Fire Department's South 19t' fire station to the subdivision is approximately 3 miles. Fire protection services will be supported by property taxes generated by this development and Fire Impact fees paid to the City of Bozeman. A copy of the Concept Plan for the Valley West Planned Unit Development was provided to the City of Bozeman Fire Department. At the time of printing, a response had not been received. Police services The City of Bozeman Police Department is located approximately 4 miles from the subdivision. Police response time to the site will vary relative to the number. of incoming calls and the need to prioritize those calls. Increased tax revenue • generated by the development will support the equipment and personnel needs created by the increased service demands. Emergency medical services American Medical Response through MedTrans of Montana located on 2101 Industrial Drive provides ambulance service. This is approximately 4 miles from the subdivision and is available through 911 dispatch. The nearest hospital is Bozeman Deaconesss Hospital, which is approximately 5 miles away from this development.. Copies of the draft preliminary plat were provided to each emergency service provider listed above. A copy of the transmittal letters and responses received prior to the printing of this submittal are included at the end of this section.. None of the providers see problems associated with providing service to the area. None of the service providers gave responses that require mitigation of impacts to staffing or facilities. 1 I � MOMSO �TENGINEERS lv SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS PNNES MMERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVO •P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 •FAX:4 6-5587-1176 • An Employee-0 Wined Company October 30,2001 Greg Megaard Deputy Chief Fire Marshal P.O. 1230 Bozeman,MT 59771 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan&Valley West Subdivision—Phase#1 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Megaard: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. Enclosed for your reference is the Valley West Subdivision -Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. A copy of the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Application was provided to you U during the DRC review process. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the.next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. We do wish to meet with you do revisit the use of automatic fire extinguishing systems for the homes within the planned unit development. We have scheduled a meeting with you for Monday,November 5, 2001 at your office. In addition to any comments you may have on the project, we are inquiring specifically about the fire departments ability to provide service to the proposed project and your estimation response times. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact me at(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morriso -Maierle,Inc. Greg Stratto ,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures • Cc: File HA33 84\003\Corresp\Pol ice 10-26-01.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" • MORRtON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS -rt SURVEYORS PLANNES L J MMERLEINC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113•BOZEMAN,MT 59771 .406.587-0721 • FAX:4 6 587-176 An Employee-Owned Company • October 29,2001 Bozeman Police Department Mark Tymrack, Chief of Police P.O' 640 Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Tymrack: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Site Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit • Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately U 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. D In addition to any comments you may have on the project, we are inquiring specifically about the police department's ability to provide service to the proposed project and your estimation response times. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact me at(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morri n-Maierle,Inc. , Gieg StrAton,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures Cc: File .H:\3384\003\Cortesp\PolicelO-26-01.doc • "Providing resources in Partnership with clients to achieve their goals" BO#MAN POLICE DEPARTMENA RECT NOV 14 2001 Chief ��zF,y Law & Justice Center Assistant Chief Mark Tymrak 9? 615 South 16th Avencce Bill Kayser • Bozeman, MT 59715 (406) 582-2000 TDD/ITY 582-2001 FAX 582-2002 FROM: Bill Kayser Assistant Chief of Police TO: Greg Stratton, P.E. Project Planner DATE: November 12, 2001 RE: Valley West PUD Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 • Dear Mr. Stratton: There are several areas I would like to address on this concept plan: 1. Alleys 2 and 4 show a width of only 20 feet as compared to alleys 1 and 3 which show a 30 foot right of way. My concern is that there is enough room for fire and garbage trucks to get through when there are vehicles or plowed snow present, and that the widths should be the same for all alleys in this PUD. 2. Lighting at intersections,streets and alleys is needed to help provide security and safety for residents and traffic alike. 3. Sidewalks are needed to provide a safe path for pedestrian traffic. 4, If bicycle lanes are incorporated into the plan there would be a problem due to the curb bulbs. 5. Response times would be dependent on the volume and nature of calls at the time a call for service would be initiated in this PUD. Calls are prioritized, and this PUD would receive the same level of.service as any other area within the City of Bozeman. The ever increasing size of the City and the demands for services, especially emergency services, can result in a situation where these services are limited. "INTEGRITYAND PROFESSIONALISM" If you need anything else, please feel free to contact me. • Sincerely, Bill Kayser Assistant Director of Public Safety M�� MOSON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS x l�l�.L -SURVEYORS PNNES win MEaE,INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD •P.O.BOX 1113 •BOZEMAN,MT 59771 • 406-587-0721 • FAX:4 6-5587-1176 • An Employee-Owned Company October 29,2001 Med Trans Montana Brian Bates 2101 industrial Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Bates: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. • Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Site Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately U 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. p In addition to any comments you may have on the project, we are inquiring specifically about your company's ability to provide service to the proposed project and your estimation response times. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact meat(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morriso -Maierle,Inc. Greg Stra66n,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures Cc: File • H:\3384\003\Corresp\AmbulancclO-26-0 I.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" Nov ` 5 2001 � • O November 1, 2001 Greg Stratton,P.E. Project Planner Morrison Maierle, Inc. Bozeman,MT 59771 Dear Mr. Stratton: I have reviewed the plans for the Valley West Planned Unix Development. It is vital that all the residences and streets be clearly marked and well lit to enable ease of location. Currently other medical responses in that area have a response time from American Medical Response • of less than 8 minutes. I do not feel there is anything inherent in the plans,which would delay emergency medical services. Please call with any questions. Respectfully, Brian Bates Field Supervisor Cc: File NORTHERN DISTRICT Billings Operation Center Bozeman Operation Center Rapid City Operation Center Cheyenne Operation Center 711 4th Ave. North 2101 Industrial Drive 1402 West Rapid Street 1950 Bluegrass Circle,Suite 150 Billings,Montana 59101-0399 Bozeman,Montana 59715 Rapid City,South Dakota 57701 Cheyenne,Wyoming 82009 (406)259-9601 (406)586-0037 (605)341-3100 (307)634-8533 (406)245-8800 Fax (406)586-0536 Fax (605)341-6357 Fax (307)634-8584 MOMSON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS INC. SURVEYORS PLANNE 1. MMERLE, IN 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD• P.O.EOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 •FAX:4 6 587-1R76 • An Employee-Owned Company October 29,2001 Bozeman Deaconess Hospital John Nordwick,President&CEO 915 Highland Boulevard Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan . 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr.Nordwick: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Site Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and Phase #1 Preliminary Plat. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately U 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial use areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. D In addition to any comments you may have on the project, we are inquiring specifically about Bozeman Deaconess' ability to provide medical services for the residents of the proposed Valley West Subdivision. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact meat(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morriso -Maierle,Inc. 1 Greg Stra on,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures Cc: File • H:\3384\003\Corresp\HospitalIO-26-0i.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals' Rj7r'n ' 7 2001 OUR MISSION: Bozeman Deaconess To improve community health and quality of[if- 0 S P I T A L -Bozeman Deocone, j Highland Blvd.• Bozeman,MT 59715 (406) 585-5000• FAX:(406) 585-1070 November 5, 2001 Greg Stratton, P.E. Morrison Maierle, Inc. P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 RE: Proposed Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr. Stratton: am not aware of any negative impact that proposed Valley West Planned Unit Development • Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 would have on our ability to deliver our services to the residents of Gallatin County. If I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, John A. Nordwick President& CEO JAN/cdi • 32 • . Schools This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to schools. Available Facilities. Elementary and middle school age students will attend Bozeman area elementary and middle schools (K through 8) in accordance with the Bozeman School Districts policies. High school age students will attend Bozeman High School. The school district student population is declining and as such, the existing facilities will have available space if the projected decline continues. The following table is extrapolated from the City of Bozeman's 2020 Community Plan, Table 11-2: Table 1 Projected District Wide School Enrollment Year K-5 6-8 9-12 Total 2002 2060 1136 1850 5046 2004 2002 1119 1837 4958 2006 2002 1087 1772 4861 2008 2002 1039 1739 4780 2010 2002 1039 1699 4740 • T 2 2 Community Plan states that the projected decline The 0 0 Co y p j c ne could be a result of the change of the composition of American households or other factors. The plan recognizes both the projected overall growth in the community from projects such as this as will as the decrease in student populations due to changing demographics. School Children. The number of students generated from the housing development within the Valley West Planned Unit Development will vary through the life of the project. The project is planned to be built out over a ten year period with the number of units being constructed in each year ranging form 105 to 195. The housing units will be a mix of single family homes, townhouses and apartments. Based on school district projected school populations for similar projects, the following table has been developed in estimating the number of students that will enroll in public schools each year. • 1 • Table 2 Projected Students from Valley West Planned Unit Development Housing Year Phase Units K-5 6-8 9-12 Total 2002 1 195 38 19 26 83 2003 2 149 29 15 20 64 2004 3 157 31 15 21 67 2005 4 131 26 13 17 56 2006 5 154 30 15 20 65 2007 6 136 27 13 18 58 2008 7 143 28 14 19 61 2009 8 160 31 16 21 68 2010 9 106 21 10 14 45 2011 10 105 21 10 14 45 Total 1436 282 140 190 612 At full build out of the project it is anticipated that 61.2 school age children will reside within the boundaries of the planned unit development. A request for • comments was provided to the Bozeman School District on October 26, 2001. The school district's response is included in the appendix. The number of students predicted by the district is slightly lower do to a slight change in the total number of projected residential units between the time that the letter to the district was sent and the current plan. Impacts on the School System. The impacts that this project will have on the school system is minimal in light of the projected changing district wide demographics and resulting decline in school enrollment. • 2 ENGINEERS t iI MORRISON SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS PLAMAIERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 •FAX;q 6-5 7-11 6 An Employee-Owned Company October 26,2001 Bozeman School District Bob Gutzman,Assistant Superintendent P.O.Box 526 Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Valley West Planned Unit Development Concept Plan 3384.003-060-0310 Dear Mr. Gutzman: In accordance with the City of Bozeman Planned Unit Development Regulations, we are required to solicit comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services to proposed projects. To ensure that we have adequate time to address your comments and include them in our submittal,we are requesting that you respond at your earliest convenience. Enclosed for your reference is the Concept Site Plan for the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development and the Phase #1 Preliminary plat. The Master Plan for the project calls for approximately 1300 dwelling units to be constructed on the Valley West Property. Specific residential and commercial U use areas are illustrated on the Concept Site Plan. The project is planned for development over the next 8 to 10 years. Phase#1 is scheduled for construction starting early in the spring of 2002. In addition to any comments.you may have on the project, we are inquiring specifically about the Bozeman School District's ability to provide educational ser%zces for the residents of the proposed Valley West Subdivision. Additionally, we are requesting your estimate of the number of students generated by the proposed project and a breakdown by schools attended. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions,please contact meat(406)587-0721. Sincerely, Morriso Maierle,Inc. GregKStrattd,P.E. Project Planner Enclosures • Cc: File H A3384\003\Corresp\school 10-26-0 l.doc "Proviclinc) resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" ! -- C'0 Xte and Operations R - Gary J. Griffith • Supervisor Phone: (406) 522-6009 404 West Main, P.O. Box 520 Fax: (406) 522-6065 Bozeman, Montana 59771-0520 November 7, 2001 Morrison Maierle, Inc. P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 Attn: Greg Stratton Subject: Valley West Planned Unit Development Dear Mr. Stratton: Please reference your letter of October 26,2001 concerning the Valley West Planned Unit Development. We would expect that 1300 housing units would generate the following students: ♦ K-5 255 Students ♦ 6-8 128 Students ♦ 9-12 170 Students As of the district's official count dated October 2001 we have the following number of spaces available in our classrooms: ♦ K-5 83 ♦ 6-8 135 ♦ 9-12 35 During the last twelve months we have responded.to similar requests for information totaling the following potential numbers of students: ♦ K-5 1340 Students ♦ 6-8 670 Students ♦ 9-12 893 Students Our existing bus system can accommodate these additional students. Sincer Gary Su isor Maintenance and Operations Bozeman School District#7 • 33 m 0 p rn m 1 rn E� g ®r, n Land Use This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to Land Use. The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Future Land Use Map identifies the Valley West Planned Unit Development Area for Residential use. The plan identifies a variety dwelling unit densities in the Residential Land Use designation. Minimum . average densities ranging from 6 to 18 dwelling units are identified. Existing land use designations for adjacent properties are identified on the Valley West Subdivision Adjacent Land Uses map included with the Site Plan. Existing land uses bordering the east side of the Valley West property are residential. The properties bordering the north and west boundaries are outside the municipal boundary of the City of Bozeman and are in agricultural use. The property adjacent to the southwest corner of the property, west of Cottonwood Road, is designated for residential development but is currently in agricultural use. The adjacent property to the south between Cottonwood Road and Ferguson Avenue calls for a combination of business.and residential office uses. The Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development uses the principles of • Traditional Neighborhood Development. Mixed density housing is planned calling densities ranging from 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. High density is planned as multi-family attached, medium density is envisioned as row house multi-family attached with some cluster home types, and low-density areas will consist of single family and duplex housing. A commercial center is located at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Babcock Street. This commercial area is.within Y2 mile of 90% of the planned housing in the subdivision. Another commercial node is planned at the intersection of Durston Road and the proposed White Oak Road. 30% of the property is designated as parks and open space. Soccer fields in . Bronken Park are currently being developed. A wetlands complex is planned directly west of the soccer fields. Wetland improvements also include the creation of a 12-acre lake and a 5-acre lake. Pedestrian circulation occurs through pocket parks, and stream and wetland corridor trails and neighborhood sidewalks. The Valley West Subdivision Land Use Map included with the site plan provides a visual aid to illustrate the proposed land uses. Access to existing public lands will not be affected by the development. All of • parks and open space within the planned area will be open to the public and 0 !. easily accessible. The proposed uses will not adversely affect adjacent land uses in the area. . No hazards or nuisances will be created by the development. Safety issues related to construction activity will be effectively controlled by standard construction management practices. • • 34 • Housing This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to Housing. The Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development uses the principles of Traditional Neighborhood Development to create up to 1436 dwelling units on approximately 310 acres. 30% of the property is designated as parks and open space and 3% is slated for neighborhood commercial use. Residential development areas, including rights-of-way, will occupy approximately 207 acres . or 67% of the property. Mixed density housing is planned at densities ranging from 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision is not planned as a second or recreational subdivision. The covenants, however, will not limit this use. • 35 $O b m n m `mod 8 z m 1 5E � 40 • Parks and Recreation Facilities This section is' a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.030 relative to Parks and Recreation Facilities. The Valley West Planned Unit Development includes an extensive park/open space and trail system to provide recreational opportunities and pedestrian corridors through the development. The planned park and open space dedications consist of approximately 92.5 acres accounting for in excess of 30% of the 310-acre area within the Planned Unit Development. Park areas and proposed uses are illustrated on the Open Space Plan included in this section. . Bronken Memorial Park, previously dedicated to the City of Bozeman will be the primary park feature. Development of Bronken Park . will be by other 'organizations, and is ongoing. Turf development for the soccer fields and base work for the parking lot is complete. There has been tremendous public support for the creation of this facility, including donations from numerous members of the community. The creation of the park during the annexation process enabled dedication to take place in a coordinated fashion, rather than in a piece-meal basis by future subdivisions. Upon completion Bronken Park will provide a combination of passive and active recreational opportunities for the entire • community. Portions of the parks and open spaces will be utilized for wetlands enhancement. The areas for wetland enhancement are illustrated on the Valley West Wetland Enhancement Plan included in the section entitled Surface Water, and on the Open Space Plan included in this section. In addition to stream corridors, a wetland complex consisting of a series of shallow wetlands and waterfowl ponds will be created directly west of Bronken Park. The complex will be designed to incorporate nature trails with interpretive signs, waterfowl viewing areas, boardwalks, and benches. Two small lakes will also be constructed in the areas identified. These lakes will be stocked with fish, providing numerous recreational opportunities for the public. All wetland enhancements will be located within public open space areas. Pedestrian circulation occurs through pocket parks, stream and wetland corridor trails and neighborhood sidewalks. Boulevard trails for pedestrian use will be . provided along Babcock Street, Ferguson Avenue, Cottonwood Road, and Durston Road. These trails will be landscaped and provide sidewalks for pedestrian circulation. Bike lanes provided along these routes will be incorporated into the roadway sections. These facilities will provide passive recreational opportunities for the entire community. 1 Parkways providing pedestrian access to and from the residential areas will be • located as illustrated on the Valley West Subdivision Open Space Plan. These parks will be passive in nature to provide corridors for pedestrian circulation. Active park areas will be developed in areas as indicated on the Open Space Plan. These areas will provide playground equipment and picnic areas for the enjoyment of the general public. Development of the park areas will generally be concurrent with the phased development of the subdivision. Parkland adjacent to each phase will be developed with that phase. A general landscape plan and development guidelines for the Planned Unit Development are provided for the parks with this . submittal. Detailed park plans will be provided with individual phases of the development. Maintenance of parks will be by a combination of the City of Bozeman, and the Valley West Homeowner's Association. Active parks and larger park areas will be maintained by the City of Bozeman after development. The homeowners association will maintain boulevard trails and parkways. 2 � �� Qa,v, '�. �� ',� f ',I �, i 36 • TAXATION This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to taxation. Existing Condition The Valley West PUD is located on property that is the process of changing from generally vacant and agricultural use to a mixed use development. The property was recently annexed to the City of Bozeman and is currently utilized as dry land hay ground or pasture. Due to its agricultural status the taxes generated from the property are minimal. Table 1 Existing Tax Parcels Parcel Number Assessment classification 2001 Property Taxes RGG 31065 Grazing Land $ 4,112.46 RGG 39709 Grazing Land $ 755.35 RGG 39708 Grazing Land $ 336.50. RGG 39707 Grazing Land. $ 235.85 RGG 31170 Ag Land $ 118.99 RGG 33464 Ag Land $ 94.47 RGG 39386 Till Irr Land $ 72.68 Total $ 5,726.30 In summary the entire property of the Valley West Planned Unit Development was assessed $5,726.30 for the 2001 tax year. Future Property Tax Revenues Future property tax revenues are estimated by determining the total market value of the real estate and the improvements placed on the real estate. This total market value is then reduced by 27.5% based on the homestead exemption provision and then multiplied by 0.03543 to produce the taxable value for the real estate and improvements. The taxable value is then multiplied by the appropriate mill levy set by the county each year. The resulting number is the real estate property tax to be paid by the owners of the property. The following table summarizes the approximate types and number of residential units for each year of the project which is utilized in the estimation of future tax revenue for the project. • 1 Table 2 . • Projected Housing Units Year Year Single-family residential Townhouse/ Duplex Apartments Total 1 2002 78 93 24 195 2 2003 67 73 9 149 3 2004 69 76 12 157 4 2005 39 59 33 131 5 2006 72 76 6 154 6 2007 56 65 15 136 7 2008 50 66 27 143 8 2009 29 43 88 . 160 9 2010 21 31 54 106 10 2011 17 26 62 105 498 608 330 1436 The average market value of $150,000.00 for each of the residential units is used in computation of the projected tax revenues. Based on this average the market value of the project is summarized in the following table for the 10 year projected build out. Table 3 • Value of Residential Units Total Year Units Market Value Taxable Market Value Taxable Value 2002 195 $29,250,000 $21,206,250 $751,337 2003 344 $51,600,000 $37,410,000 $1,325,436 2004 501 $75,150,000 $54,483,750 $1,930,359 2005 632 $94,800,000 $68,730,000 $2,435,104 2006 786 $117,900,000 $85,477,500 $3,028,468 2007 922 $138,300,000 $100,267,500 $3,552,478 2008 1065 $159,750,000 $115,818,750 $4,103,458 2009 1225 $183,750,000 $133,218,750 $4,719,940 2010 1331 $199,650,000 $144,746,250 $5,128,360 2011 1436 $215,400,000 $156,165,000 $5,532,926 The taxable value of property is multiplied by the appropriate mill to determine. the property tax bill for individual properties. Based on 2001 tax assessments mill level of approximately 505 mills, the following is the estimate of the assessment for the project during the next ten years. 2 • t Table 4 Estimated General Property Taxes General Property Taxes Total Units Taxable Value _(505 mills) 195 $751,337 $379,425 344 $1,325,436 $669,345 501 $1,930,359 $974,831 632 $2,435,104 $1,229,727 786 $3,028,468 $1,529,376 922 $3,552,478 $1,794,001 1065 $4,103,458 $2,072,246 1225 $4,719,940 $2,383,570 1331 $5,128,360 $2,589,822 1436 $5,532,926 $2,794,128 The property tax generated from the property, without considering inflation, will increase from $ 5,726.30 to an estimated $ 2,794,128.00 upon project completion. • School Tax Revenue The present total school tax listed on the 2001 Tax Bills for properties in Bozeman is approximately 250 mills. This is approximately 50% of the total tax bill for city residents. Based on the taxable value of the property, the school taxes paid by the owners of the property will increase from the current level of approximately $2,800 to $1,383,000 at the full build out of the project. While the percentage of this total amount that returns to the local school district on an annual basis varies considerably, .the tax revenue returning to the school district will be substantial. Other Taxes Other taxes that will be levied against the property include an assessment of 2.38 mills for the Open Space Bond, an assessment of 1.15 mills for the Conservation District and a $6.00 assessment per lot for the Gallatin County Water Quality District. At full build out of the project the projected total project assessment are as follows;-1)Open Space Bond - $13,168, 2) Conservation District - $6,363 and 3) Gallatin County Water Quality District— Range of$5,800 to $8,600. Street Maintenance Assessment The City of Bozeman levies an assessment for street and tree maintenance for each • parcel in the city. The assessment is utilized to partially fund the maintenance of public 3 streets and boulevard trees in the city. The current assessment level is based on lot area and is $0.00785/square foot for streets and $0.00156/square foot for trees. While the exact assessment for the project will depend on the final lot layout developed through the planned unit development process, the approximate assessment for the entire planned unit development is estimated based on a total lot area of 146 acres. The street assessment would be approximately $50,000 per year and the tree assessment would be approximately $10,000 for the entire planned unit development. Impact Fees In addition to the increase in property taxes generated by the project, as each residential unit is constructed the City of Bozeman will assess impact fees. Based .on the current 90% levy of impact fees, the following table shows the amount of fees that will be assessed for each residential unit: Table 5 Project Impact Fee Assessments per Unit (2001 Levels) Fee Type Single-family residential Townhouse / Duplex Apartments Fire $181.87 $152.74 $83.40 Street $1,777.55 $1,204.80 $1,204.80 Water $2,142.32 $2,142.32 $1,071.16 Sewer $2,716.07 $2,716.07 $1,358.04 • Table 6 Total Project Impact Fee Assessments (2001 Levels) Fee Type Single-family residential Townhouse/ Duplex Apartments Total Fire $90,572.26 $92,865.31 $27,522.99 $210,960.56 Street $885,221.89 $732,520.22 $397,584.99 $2,015,327.10 Water $1,066,872.87 $1,302,527.52 $353,481.98 $2,722,882.37 Sewer $1,352,604.85 $1,651,372.99 $448,152.21 $3,452,130.05 Total $3,395,271.87 $3,779,286.04 $1,226,742.17$8,401,300.08 In summary the project will pay a total estimated assessment of approximately $8,400,000 in impact fees over the life of the project. 4 • 37 0 Accessibility of Service Systems and Facilities The followingtable represents the approximate distances from Phase 1 to the P Pp facilities noted. These distances are fairly representative of the entire project, however, the actual distances will increase by approximately Y2 mile at the western extreme of the subdivision. Total Distances, In miles, Over Roads- Unimproved Graded Graveled Paved Fire 0 0 0 4 Protection Police 0 0 0 4 Protection Hospital 0 0 0 5 Facilities Elementary 0 0 0 2.5 School High 0 0 0 3 School • 38 m v �5 o m T y3 . Y cn c K m 8£ . a • 'ail` Effects on Agriculture This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to the Effects on Agriculture. Agricultural activity in the area is primarily limited to the cultivation of grain crops and pasture for grazing or hay production. Of the approximately 310 acres within the project site, none is currently use for agricultural pursuits. The property is not part of a viable farm and has been unutilized for the last several seasons. No significant impacts to agriculture in the area are identified. As a consequence, no mitigation measures are proposed. The site is within the urbanizing fringe of Bozeman. This is in a direction that is a logical extension of the community. The Valley West property was previously annexed for the purpose of urban development. Control of family pets will primarily be an issue for the future homeowners association to address. It is not expected that family pets from this development will have any adverse effect on agriculture in the area. In addition, the.City of Bozeman Animal Control will address any emergency conflicts between animals such as pets and people. None of the fences surrounding this development that are currently utilized by the • owner of the Valley West Subdivision Planned Unit Development properties. Fences around the boundary of the property that are utilized by adjacent property owners will remain in place. The owners of the property on where the fences lie are responsible for any maintenance needed. • 39 Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities and Proposed Mitigation of • Impacts This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.050 relative to the Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities. Agricultural water user facilities on site include irrigation ditches and stream- ditches providing irrigation water to downstream users. The Maynard — Border Stream-Ditch and Baxter Creek transport irrigation water through the property. A flooding analysis of these drainages is provided with the Valley West Subdivision Drainage Plan. A small lake will be constructed along the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. The lake will be fed by groundwater and water diverted from the stream. Existing water rights for the property will be converted to non-consumptive use water rights for the diversion. The lake will be created with flow through capability so that water diverted from the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch will be returned to the channel at the downstream side of the lake. Special consideration will also be given to crossing of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch by Cascade Street and Durston Road, to ensure adequate water will pass to downstream.users. An open space/park corridor through the length of the development will protect the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. There will be no reduction in the capacity of the • Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch to provide water to downstream users. The Baxter Ditch, recently relocated to parallel Cottonwood Road, will be protected by an easement for maintenance access. Subdivision roads will cross the ditch using culverts at four locations. Special consideration will be given to these facilities to ensure adequate water will pass for downstream users. There will be no reduction in the capacity of the Baxter Ditch to provide water to downstream users. Baxter Creek will be enhanced to resemble the natural stream it once was. The stream will be located entirely within an open space/park corridor. No modifications to Baxter Creek will affect its ability to provide water to downstream users. The .ability of the stream to deliver water to downstream users will be protected. • 1 ao The Effect on Agriculture and Proposed Mitigation This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning P q Y 9 Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.040 relative to the Effect on Agriculture and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts. Agricultural activity in the vicinity has been limited to the cultivation of grain crops and pasture for grazing or hay production. Owing to shallow soils and depth to ground water, past cultivation of the Valley West site was limited to hay Production and grazing. Of the approximately 310 acres within the project site, none is currently use for agricultural pursuits. The property is currently unutilized. No significant impacts to agriculture in the area are identified. As a consequence, no mitigation measures are proposed. The site is within the urbanizing fringe of Bozeman and has been master planned and zoned for urban development. This is in a direction that is a logical extension of the community. The Valley West property was previously annexed for the purpose of urban development. • 1 • 41 1 Fn v m • 8 z c 3 m J Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities and Proposed Mitigation of • Impacts This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.040 relative to the Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts. Agricultural water user facilities on site include irrigation ditches and stream- ditches providing irrigation water to downstream users. The Maynard — Border Stream-Ditch and Baxter Creek transport irrigation water through the property. A flooding analysis of these drainages is provided with the Valley West Subdivision. Drainage Plan. A small lake will be constructed along the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. The lake will be fed by groundwater and water diverted from the stream. Existing water rights for the property will be converted to non-consumptive use water rights for the diversion. The lake will be created with flow through capability so that water diverted from the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch will be returned to the channel at the downstream side of the lake. Special consideration will also be given to crossing of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch by Cascade Street and Durston Road, to ensure that they can pass adequate water to downstream users. An open space/park corridor through the length of the.development will • protect the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch. There will be no reduction in the capacity of the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch to provide water to downstream users. The Baxter Ditch, recently relocated to parallels Cottonwood Road, will be protected by an easement for maintenance access. Subdivision roads will cross the ditch using culverts at four locations. Special consideration will be given to these facilities to ensure they can pass adequate water for downstream users. There will be no reduction in the capacity of the Baxter Ditch to provide water to downstream users. Baxter Creek will be enhanced to resemble the natural stream it once was. The stream will be located entirely within and open space/park corridor. No modifications to Baxter Creek will affect its ability to provide water to downstream users. The ability of the stream to deliver water to downstream users will.be protected. 1 42 The Effect on Local Services and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts This section is 'a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.040 relative to the Effect on Local Services and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts. Much of the impact of this development, in regards to the effect on local services provided by the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County or other public entities, is. mitigated through the funding of the related public agencies/departments. This will be accomplished through the payment of legally required impact fees by the developer with the submittal of final subdivision plans and by traditional property taxes and other fees that will arise as the project is completed. Water Supply Water will be supplied by the City of Bozeman through a set of mains installed on-site and connected to the existing system during the 1998 construction season. A water distribution system will be installed to distribute water from these trunk mains to serve the area. These water mains were installed and designed specifically to serve the Valley West annexation area. A detailed water distribution system design report is included in the section entitled Water Supply. • Sewage Disposal Sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of Bozeman and drained from the site by mains installed during the construction season of 1998. The on-site mains will drain into collectors and out-fall lines constructed .off-site to serve the project site and adjacent properties to the north and west. The off-site sewer line improvements were installed and designed specifically to serve the Valley West annexation area. A detailed sewer collection system design report is included in the section entitled Sewage Disposal. Law Enforcement and Fire Protection These services will be provided by the City of Bozeman and financed by legally required impact fees and the future tax base generated by the project. The section entitled "Emergency Services" provides a specific review of law enforcement and fire protection provisions. . Upgrades and Extensions of Off-site Streets and Annual Maintenance Costs Gas tax revenues and street taxes and legally required impact fees will cover impacts to the street system beyond the improvements required in the Valley West annexation agreement including annual maintenance costs. The development of the Valley West Subdivision will require off-site street improvements to Cottonwood Road, and Durston Road. The applicant will work with the City to deal with upgrades to Durston Road and will participate to a fair • and reasonable level. Details regarding the issues surrounding Durston Road are discussed in the Section entitled Durston Road. 1 Additional offsite improvements are planned for Cottonwood Road. These include construction of the east half of the roadway and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane. Funding for these improvements is planned to be by a combination of private funds and the creation of a Special Improvement District. As noted in the Traffic Impact Assessment for this project, a number of traffic calming measures within the project are proposed. They are intended to minimize vehicle/pedestrian conflicts and create a more "pedestrian friendly" neighborhood. Provision of educational services and costs to providers Tax revenue generated by this development will be used to support the demand put upon the school district by any additional enrollment. The section entitled "Schools" reviews the impact of the development on school enrollment. The section entitled "Taxation" reviews revenues generated for the school district. Current and projected property taxes The current amount of property taxes paid are based on agricultural zoning and land use. The assessed value will increase dramatically as the property is converted to residential use. The section entitled "Taxation" provides a detailed review of the revenues to be generated. Provision of Utilities and Easements Easements for public and private • utilities are critical to properly functioning neighborhood infrastructure. Water and sewer will generally be located in typical locations on public street right-of-way. Alleys are planned throughout the development for private utilities to provide their services. Additional easement requirements will be shown on preliminary plat submittals for the individual phases of the development. • 2 • • 43 s • • The Effect on the Natural Environment and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts This section is a response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 .and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.040 relative to the Effect on the Natural Environment and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts. Street/road drainage and erosion Due to the flat grades and low to mid- range erosion potential of the soil types found on site, it is expected that erosion will be easily handled with standard erosion control measures during construction and upon completion. All proposed construction related to this project will be designed and constructed to comply with local as well as State of Montana regulations in regards to drainage and erosion control. All proposed roads will be paved and all disturbed areas will be graded and seeded. Methods of erosion control and revegetation shall be in conformance to the MDEQ Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and use of Best Management Practices (BMP's) as required in preparation of the MPDES Stormwater Erosion Control Plan. Example for disturbed areas typically include: Ground cover — topsoil replacement, mulching, hydro — and hand seeding native grass species, sediment trapping fabric fences, protection of culvert outlets, and temporary straw bale swale protection. If needed, areas with significant cut and • fill can employ the use of rock-filled gabions, geotextile fabric, and other accepted measures as necessary to protect soil retention and lessen erosion. Terrain and surface runoff effects / Grading & Drainage The flat nature of the existing terrain as well as the overall moderate infiltration rates of the existing soil types suggest reasons that storm drainage from the site has not historically been a problem. Stormwater drainage from the proposed streets will be collected and directed to the proposed wetland / open space corridors which coincide with the natural drainage channels existing on the site. A detailed drainage plan for the property is provided in the Section entitled Valley West Subdivision Preliminary Drainage Plan. Likewise, storm water generated off-site and flowing to the site is channeled to the on-site drainage channels where it is passively treated by a combination of vegetation and retention/detention areas within the proposed open space/wetland corridors. Storm water runoff leaves the site through existing culverts in Durston Road. The sizing of these culverts and future piping improvements along Durston Road will be addressed during the design stages for the future reconstruction of Durston Road. Future subdivision development applications will be required to provide grading plans to deal with runoff issues in more detail. The Preliminary Drainage Plan • included with this planned unit development submittal will serve as a guide for design and development of stormwater collection and treatment systems. 1 • . s Maintenance of the portions of the storm water drainage system that fall within • the City rights-of-way and the open space/wetland corridors will be by the City of Bozeman. Landscaping and ground maintenance within parks dedicated to the City of Bozeman will be the responsibility of the City of Bozeman. Any landscaping within parks owned by the Valley West Homeowners Association will be the responsibility of the homeowners association. For more details regarding drainage concerns, please refer to the Valley West Subdivision Preliminary Drainage Plan. Effects on native vegetation, soils, quality and quantity of surface or ground waters There are no identified critical plant communities. Native vegetation is limited by past agricultural activities. The general health of the on-site vegetation associated with the drainage corridors will be improved by the wetlands enhancement and the elimination of grazing activity on the property. Groundwater quality will be protected by the use of municipal sewer services and by the adherence to State and local regulations. Surface water quality will be protected by the adherence to Federal (wetlands), State and local regulations pertaining to pollution from stormwater runoff and detention. Noxious Weed Control A weed management plan was previously approved • by Gallatin County Weed Control District and can be found in the Section entitled Vegetation. The provisions of the approved plan will apply to all phases of this development. The future lot owners associations will have the ability to implement the weed management plan in the event that individual lot owners do not. 2 as The Effect on Wildlife and-Wildlife Habitat and Proposed Mitigation of • Impacts . This section is a.response to the requirements of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision.Regulation . Section 16.18.040 relative to the Effect on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts. There are no critical or significant wildlife populations on or adjacent to the site. Furthermore, there are'no known populations of animals found on site'that will be adversely affected by house pets such as dogs or cats: The quality of fisheries in the Maynard-Border Stream-Ditch and Baxter Creek is expected.to improve with the wetland enhancements outlined in the Section titled Surface Waters. Correspondence with the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks is included in the Section entitled Wildlife. The letter does not raise concerns regarding the affect of the development on wildlife or habitat. It does state, 1n general the development takes admirable steps in protecting waterways and mitigating wetlands." The subdivision is in an area that has been master planned and zoned for urban • ..development. . 1 45 a The Effect on Public Health and Safety and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts This section is a response to the requirements p q is of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54.060 and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulation Section 16.18.040 relative to the Effect on Public Health and Safety and proposed Mitigation of Impacts. Potential Natural Hazards There are no significant natural hazards to the site posed by the threat of flooding, snow, mud or rock slides, high winds, wildfire or excessive slopes. High groundwater will be a construction concern for portions of the property.. Standard four to five foot high foundation walls and footings placed on the native underlying gravels will provide good structural support for buildings. Daylight basements can be constructed in the southeast portions of the project area. Road design and construction will account for soil and groundwater conditions. Valley West is truly an extension of existing development in this area. The Heritage Christian School, which is surrounded by the Valley West project on three sides and lies at the north side of the proposed project near the wetland areas (around the outfall of the Maynard-Border stream-ditch) has recently constructed a new school building to expand their facilities. • Work, associated with the annexation of this project site, including roads, water mains and sewer trunk has been successfully completed by using common construction practices. Potential Man-made Hazards There are no known man-made hazards related to this proposed development. This application, in itself, would not result in a resident population that would be subjected to unsafe conditions caused by inadequate infrastructure or access to emergency services. 1