Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300224851807929) l� -�+k ` _ . -'x j �'�.• ;1,L , `ice`. u6.w ,i q. a z Vipi y •+'tr yn. Vim.1./fix c•. mew Z-01204 Baxter Meadows MaSub rr� xr PUD Preliminary Plan ; t 4598 Baxter LN File 2 Of 2 Williams Brothers Construsticn Qctober 29, 2001 - .v;i. 4� TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1 — 5 Conditional Use Permit Application Pages 5 — 17 PUD Submittal Requirements Exhibit "A" —Phase One Site Plan Exhibit "B" —Project Master Plan Exhibit"C" — Street Sections Exhibit "D" — Plat Maps (5)-See Sub. Prelim. Plat Appl. Exhibit "E" — Phasing Plan Exhibit "G" —Architecture Exhibit "F" — Wetlands Exhibit "J" — Sewer Exhibit "K" — Storm sewer/Grading plan Exhibit "L-1, L-2, L-3" —Landscape Plan Exhibit "M" — Water Exhibit "O" — Certificate of Survey Exhibit "P" — Temporary facilities plan Appendix "A" — Soils report Appendix "E 1" — Design Guidelines Appendix "E 2" —Design Guidelines Appendix "F" —Response to Staff comments Appendix "G" — Reduced Exhibits RFGFI%/Fr) F3Y NOV n 7 2001 CITY PLANNING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ~' PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL---� J �f lr u` + y�Ra. +�,' •� t��:�'�j�M: � �'y''��'. .••���S �/.'i�M.r .. - � ', r�•� 'rJa �a+`-1A\ � i� � r��'.., ���%�� • , ��� ji;, r3i. � t� �� 't i�l' '� ' '� , it 1. '✓ 1��,�,` T ,, .� . BAXTER MEADOWS Phase i Bozeman, Montana Williams Brothers MITHUN Construction ARCHITECTS.DESIGNERS.PLANNERS i CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P. O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360, FAX (406) 582-2363 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION O C T 2 9 2001 FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN P.U.D. CITY Nl.V,.11.i 4'i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which'is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This review will also include a review for Certificate of Appropriateness, if applicable. Deviations and/ or variances will be processed concurrently. Additional submittal materials apply. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: WBC, LP 4598 East Baxter Lane P.O. Box 11060 Bozeman, MT 59719 Phone: 406-585-1209 2. Name and mailing address of applicant Mithun Blair Stone, Project Manager Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Ste. 200 Seattle,WA 98101 Phone: 206-623-3344 3. Name and mailing address of representative John Myles 4598 East Baxter Lane P.O.Box 11060 Bozeman, MT 59719 Phone: 406-582-7523 4. Name and mailing address of Engineer/Architect/Planner Mithun Architects and Planners Blair Stone,Architect,Proiect Manager Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Ste. 200 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-623-3344 Robert Peccia & Associates Engineers, P.O. Box 5653, 825 Custer Avenue Helena, Montana 59604 Phone: 406-447-5000 PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 200] 1 5. Name of project/development: Baxter Meadows 6. Address of proposed development: 4598 Baxter Lane East—Pending annexation Bozeman, Montana 59718 7. Legal description: Tract 1, Tract 2, Tract 3, and Tract 4, Certificate of Survey No. 2202, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, and being that part of the Southwest Quarter and all of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., and the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. Gallatin County, Montana, all described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Section 3; thence southerly 181' 33' 57", assumed azimuth from north, 2660.08 feet along the east line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 3; thence westerly 270' 07' 11" azimuth 2636.21 feet along the south line of said Northeast uarter• thence northerly 001' 12' 19" azimuth 2640.28 feet along the west line of said Northeast uarter• thence westerly 269' 51' 01" azimuth 1983.12 feet along the south line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 34; thence northerly 353" 01' 04" azimuth 249.09 feet; thence westerly 269' 45' 45" azimuth 632.56 feet; thence northerly 000' 24' 41" azimuth 1750.20 feet along the west line of the Southwest Quarter; of said Section 34, thence easterly 089' 52' 17" azimuth 1322.67 feet along the south line of Certificate of Survey No. 233; thence northerly 000' 22' 38" azimuth 665.37 feet along the east line of said Certificate of Survey No. 233; thence easterly 089" 531_19" azimuth 3971.29 feet along the north line of the Southwest Quarter and the north line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 34; thence southerly 180' 15' 01" azimuth 2651.80 feet along the east line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 34, to the point of beginning. Area = 20,050,540 square feet, 460.2971 acres or 1,862,756.1 square meters. Subject to existing easements. 8. Current Zoning AS —Agriculture Suburban District, Note: Pending City Zoning Area: 460 acres 9. Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary): Baxter Meadows is a 460-acre mixed-use development, located in Bozeman, Montana, northwest of downtown on Baxter Lane between Davis Road to the east and Harper PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 2 Puckett Road to the west, Oak Street to the south and Deadmans Gulch to the north. Baxter Meadows will be a mixed-use neo-traditional community, a pedestrian friendly, walkable community, emphasizing pedestrian activities, a gentle human scale, and safe streets. Baxter Meadows will be a Bozeman neighborhood that preserves its natural amenities and enhance them. It will preserve the historic barn that is located on the site. The community will be developed in 5 phases. The first phase will consist of a variety of residential uses,an equestrian center,a veterinary office,a marketing center, community center, bed & breakfast and generous parks and open space. The following is a breakdown of the different uses in Phase I. Phase I Lot Size Net Acres Number of Units Estate Homes 120' x 110' 10.83ac 32 Traditional Homes 82.5' x 90' 3.23ac 20 Village Homes 46' x 89' 2.46ac 20 Cottages 42' x 64' 3.27ac 40 Townhomes 1.45ac 19 Condominiums .81ac 20 Work/Live Townhomes .3ac 7 Equestrian Center 10ac 1 Veterinary Office lac 1 Pocket Parks/Linear Parks 4.05ac Equestrian, Open Space 11.84ac Community Center,Bed & Breakfast 5ac The "Estate Homes" will have front doors and porches, which face the street. The garages will access from the side of the home. Some of the homes will.feature a carriage unit above the garage. The homes will be clustered together and will be surrounded by fields that serve the equestrian center and preserve the natural elements of the site. The "Traditional Homes" will have front porches or stoops which will face the streets. The garages will be entered from the side of the home or from the front with the garage doors recessed from the front of the home. The "Village Homes" will have garage access from an alley. They will have front porches or stoops, which face the street. The "Cottage Homes" will have vehicular access from the alley. The front of the homes will be clustered around pocket parks or front streets. Each unit will have a front porch or stoop that will be visible from the street. The "Townhomes" will face streets and neighborhood parks. The garages will be located around an auto court to the rear and will not be visible from the street. The units will be designed to resemble one large home from the street. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 3 The"Condominiums" will have directly attached garages,located off an alley,and will have S units per building. They will all have a one or two car garage. Each of the condotninium units will have a front porch or stoop which will face the street or a green. The"WorktLive Town Homes"will have garages located off an alley. Each unit will have a front porch located off the street and will feature a street level workspace suitable for a home business accessed directly from the sidewalk. The Community Center will be located in the renovated historic barn. It will,be used for social events and neighborhood gatherings. The architecture of the various housing types will feature traditional residential design and will reflect the architectural character of historic Bozeman neighborhoods and farmhouses. 10. Review Pee: $660.00 (Mininulm fee after refund: $400.00) This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and twenty(20)copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements)drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81Va"x 11" or larger than 24"x 36 folded in individual sets not smaller than SW'x 11" or larger than BV x 14" in size. Application deadlines vary, This application must be signed and dated by each applicant and property owner(if different) before the submittal will be accepted. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Date' < � ate; Applicant's Signature Property Owner's Signature PUDIREL PLAN APPLICATION AND StMM rrAL REQ May 2001 4 CITY OF BOZEMAN S DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MT 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX (406) 582-2363 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant Mithun Date: Residential PUD X Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Project Baxter Meadows Commercial PUD The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items listed for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked "NO" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal, staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB) agendas, followed by a City Planning Board review. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. I. Document Requirements YES NO N/A The following information shall be presented in an 82@ x 11" vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and will be organized in the following order: A. Application forms; X B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the PUD; WBC, LP, A Montana Limited Partnership C. Legal description of the site; X D. Adjacent property owners: (1) A copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400' of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the PUD is proposed, exclusive of public r/w; See Exhibit H, vicinity map (2) The original list shall be included in the document; Has been addressed by Dale Beland PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 5 0 0 (3) Names and addresses shall be included on plain (no return address), #10 (4-1/8" x 9-1/2"), stamped envelops; Has been addressed by Dale Beland E. A statement of planning objectives, including: (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; This application does constitute an improvement to the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan. The current and future economic outlook for Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley remains strong as many existing and potential businesses look to locate or expand their operations here. While the economic benefits are significant, the critical issue is how to facilitate this anticipated growth without compromising the values and sense of community that make Bozeman such a unique and wonderful place to both live and work. This request will facilitate development to occur around smart-growth principals that will allow a balance between quality of life issues and future phases. • Neighborhoods: Approval of this application will allow Baxter Meadows to center development around three distinct neighborhoods: The commercial/activity neighborhood (future phases),low-density residential neighborhood, and the medium to high-density neighborhood. These neighborhoods work together serving a variety of housing, service, and recreational needs facilitating the sense of community. • Transportation: Approval of this application will allow alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and transit to be developed together with the automobile rather than solely on the automobile. • Mixed-Use: Approval of this application will allow a diverse mix of activities, including shopping, living, working and recreating all within walking distance to each other. • Open Space: Approval of this application will allow significant open space, including the proposed 100-acre regional park, neighborhood parks, equestrian area, wetlands, and trails system. By focusing on proven smart-growth concepts, Baxter Meadows will provide the critical balance of growth opportunities for business while enhancing the quality of life for its residence. The benefits of this development will be felt throughout the community. (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant=s intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; The equestrian open space, neighborhood green, pocket parks and linear parks will be privately owned and maintained by WBL,LP until Homeowners Association is formed. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses; Total 12 employees for Phase I (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; Baxter Meadows has been designed as a neo-traditional community. Baxter Meadows will be a mixed-use community. The master plan was designed to promote a pedestrian friendly environment. Minimizing the impervious surface and providing narrow streets have accomplished this. This will slow down the traffic, making it safe for pedestrians. The plan also minimizes the impact of the garage by providing alleys or side entry garages or placing the garages off of courtyards. (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion;the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; This is addressed in the checklist and Drawings (6) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated; There should be no conflicts between land uses in Phase I. The plan has been designed as one neighborhood. (7) Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g. - home/business, utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling); The plan will be in compliance to the Montana Energy Code and Building Construction. The site plan is designed to minimize impervious surfaces. Energy efficient appliances should be used. The plant material selected will be drought and fire tolerant and low water usage. Streetlights will be selected for low energy consumption. F. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the PUD, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; _Utility construction will begin upon approval and completed Nov. 2002. Veterinary and Equestrian Center to begin upon approval and completed Dec. 2002. 1/3 of the housing will begin upon approval and end Dec. 2002. The remainder of the housing Oct. 2002— Dec. 2003. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 7 G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 82 @ x 11" or 11" x 17" size. X _ 2. Site Plan Requirements A. A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale not greater than 1" = 40' or less than 1" = 100'; and composed of one (1) or more sheets not lager than 24' x 36", showing the following information: X 2. Name of project/development; Baxter Meadows, Phase I 3. Location of project/development by street address; 4598 Baxter Lane East Bozeman, MT 59718 4. Location map; including area within one (1) mile of site; See Exhibit H., Vicinity Map 5. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; WBC, LP 1035 Cerise Road Billings, MT 59101 6. Name and mailing address of engineer/architect; Mithun, Architect/Planner Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way Seattle, WA 98101 Robert Peccia & Associates,Engineers P.O. Box 5653 825 Custer Avenue Helena, MT 59604 7. Date of plan preparation; October 19, 2001 G. North point indicator; X H. Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map 1. Listing of specific land uses being proposed; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan 10. Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan 11. Total number, type, and density per type of dwelling units; See Exhibit A,Phase I Site Plan L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (Floor Area Ratio, FAR), with a breakdown by land use; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 8 . Floor Area Ratio Land Use Bldg. S.F. Lot S.F. 0.10 Equestrian Center 45,000 435,600 0.08 Veterinary 3,460 43,560 0.05 Comm. Center/Bed & Breakfast 10,805 206,696 N. Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel(s) and total site, including the following: Impervious Surface Calculations Per Lot Building Type Lot Size Building Coverage % + Driveway/Walkway = Total % Estate 13,200 sq ft 3,596 sq ft 27% 1,470 sg ft 38% Traditional 7,425 sq ft 2,172 sq ft 29% 1,040 sq ft 43% Village 4,094 sq ft 2,272 sg ft 55% 100 sq ft 58% Cottage 2,688 sg ft 1,415 sa ft 52% 100 sq ft 56% Veterinary 43,560 sq ft 3,460 so ft 8% 6,270 sq ft 22% Equestrian 435,600 so ft 45,000 sq ft 10% -20,000 sq ft 15% Center Live/Work -1620 sq ft 746 sq ft 46% 600 sq ft 83% Condominiums 33,451 sq ft 16,760 so ft 50% 4,562 sq ft 63% (Four 5-unit Buildings) Town Home --2,400 sg ft 1,140 sg ft 47% 160 s4 ft 54% B&B/Comm. 206,696 sa ft 9,340 sg ft 5% 15,530 sa ft 12% Center Total Phase One Buildings 361,994 sq ft Driveways/Walkways 127,442 sa ft Roads 228,644 so ft Sidewalks 73,355 sa ft Impervious 781,303 sq ft 17.94 Acres Phase One Site Area 64.66 Acres 28% Impervious (5) Percentage and square footage of Active recreational use@ area; Active Park Open Space 1.89 Acres Passive Park Open Space 1.7 Acres Equestrian Open Space 11.81Acres Passive Open Space 30.72 Acres Total Open Space 46.72 Acres PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 9 15. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest, handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking, with typical dimensions of each; Parking Provided Product Cars per Driveway Per Unit Product units stalls Total Estate homes 3 2 5 160 Carriage unit 2 2 64 Traditional homes 3 2 5 100 Village homes 2 2 40 (1/3 of units have 2 driveway stalls) 2 6 Cottages 2 2 80 Townhomes 2 2 38 Condominiums 1 1 20 (2 HC provided per building) Live/Work 2 2 14 (5 units have 2 driveway stalls) 5 5 Bed & Breakfast 3 7 10 10 Care-taker Unit 2 2 2 Veterinary Office 8 8 Equestrian Center 10 10 (40 cars at gravel overflow parking) 40 40 Street parking 323 Total in Phase I 920 16. Topographic contours at two-fobt intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; See Exhibit F, Wetlands/Existing Condition 17. Watercourses, water bodies and irrigation ditches; See Exhibit F, Wetlands/Existing Cond. 18. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; See Exhibit F, Wetlands /Existing Condition 19. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than 22@, by species; See Exhibit F, Wetlands/Existing Condition PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 10 ti Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan for locations PRODUCT SO FT COTTAGES 1,200 -2,200 VILLAGES 2,000-2,350 TRADITIONAL 3,000 - 31650 ESTATES 4,000 -4,200 TOWNHOMES 4-PLEX 9,000 3-PLEX 7,000 DUPLEX 3,600 CONDOS 8,200 LIVE/WORK 1200-1600/250-500 BED & BREAKFAST 5,502 COMM. CENTER 5,300 VETERINARY 3,460 EQUESTRIAN CENTER 45,000 20. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active recreational use; See Exhibit L-1, Landscape Plan 22. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks, recreational areas, school sites, and similar uses; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan, Exhibit B, Master Plan, Exhibit L-1, Landscape Plan 23. Location of existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; See Exhibit L1-L3 Landscape Plan 24. Maximum building height of all structures; PRODUCT ZONING MAX. HEIGHT COTTAGES R-3 38'-0" VILLAGES R-3 38'-0" TRADITIONAL R-3 38'-0" ESTATES R-1 32'-0" TOWNHOMES 4-PLEX R-3 38'-0" 3-PLEX R-3 38'-0" DUPLEX R-3 38'-0" CONDOS R-3 38'-0" LIVE/WORK R-3 42'-0" * BED & BREAKFAST R-3 38'-0" EQUESTRIAN CENTER R-1 44'-0" * COMM. CENTER R-3 38'-0" VETERINARY R-1 32'-0" Exceeds Chapter 18 Building Heights PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 11 25. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial, collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the development; notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included where appropriate; See Exhibit C, Street Sections, all streets and alleys will be public 26. Existing zoning; AS, Agricultural Suburban District, Note: pending City Zoning AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls, and other landscaping; See Exhibit L1-L3 Landscape Plan BB. Proposed signage, with locations and illustrative examples; See Exhibit L1 Landscape for location. More detailed designs will follow. CC. Adjacent site information: Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200' of the .proposal, exclusive of public r/w at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (1) Land uses and location of principle structures; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (2) Densities of residential uses; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (3) Existing trees and major features of landscape; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (4) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (5) Traffic Circulation System; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map DD. Supplemental vicinity map: Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one (1) mile showing: See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (1) Zoning districts; See Exhibit H,Vicinity Map (2) Location of municipal boundary lines; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (3) Traffic circulation system; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (4) Major public facilities including schools, parks, trails, etc.; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 12 r EE. Attorney's or owner's(s') certification of ownership; See Attached Certificate at end of this Application. FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the City Planning Board and Zoning Commission certification of approval of the site plan, including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100; N/A GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan; N/A 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements A. Architectural elevations: Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; See Exhibit G, Architectural Design B. Landscape treatment: See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape A general landscaping plan indicating: (1) Treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape (2) All existing vegetation with identification of trees by sizes of species; See Exhibit L1-L3, Landscape (3) Specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape (4) The scale shown on plant materials; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape 3. Utility plans: The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: (1) Sanitary sewers; See Exhibit J (2) Storm sewers/grading; See Exhibit K (3) Water; See Exhibit M (4) Electric; To be provided at a later date. Currently developing this. (5) Gas; To be provided at a later date. Currently developing this. (6) Telephone lines; To be provided at a later date. Currently developing this. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 13 U (7) Fire hydrants; See Exhibit M (8) Trash collection areas; Trash collection will be in cans at individual units with collection occurring in alleys or if no alleys in streets. 4. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including the proposed width, treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed; See Exhibit C, Street Sections 5. Physiographic data, including the following: (1) A description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping; See Appendix A, Soils Report (2) A map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100' year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City; See Appendix A, Soils Report (3) A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table, fluctuations, and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping; See Appendix A, Soils Report F. Drainage plan: Preliminary drainage report and calculations and/or plan, including: See Exhibit K, Storm Sewer/Drainage Plan (1) All watercourses on the property or which are located within 200' of the property, must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated; (2) All drainage, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc., which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated; (3) All irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown; (4) All required on-site detention areas, including notes indicating the approximate area and volume of the facility; (5) All plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for the storm drainage from the property, including the name of the drainage-way PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 14 (where appropriate), the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage-ways, etc.), and any downstream restrictions; (6) Existing and/or proposed grading plan; 7. Temporary facilities plan: A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; See Exhibit P—Temporary Facilities 8. Preliminary subdivision plat: If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City=s Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; See Exhibit D—Subdivison Plat Map I. Traffic impact analysis: At the discretion of the Public Service Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: See Appendix G —Traffic Analysis, Outline of Traffic report to follow (1) Land use and trip generation - a table of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used (daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation; (2) Traffic graphics showing: (a) AM peak hour site traffic; (b) PM peak hour site traffic; (c) AM peak hour total traffic; (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately); (3) AM and PM capacity analysis: An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial, collector-collector, and arterial-collector intersections within one (1) mile of the site or as directed by the PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 15 Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) Trip generation - using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual; (2) Trip distribution; (3) Traffic assignment; (4) Capacity analysis; (5) Evaluation; (6) Recommended access plan, including access points, modifications and any mitigation techniques; (5) Additional Analysis Criteria: Appropriate clearance intervals shall be provided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at intersections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be 4' per second with a minimum AWALK@ time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three (3) through lanes in each direction, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential intersections with signals will be placed on 3 mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service AC@ shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service AD@ be accepted for site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall operate at Level of Service AC@; if Level of Service AE@ is the result of the study, then alternatives of providing Level of Service AD@ shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally, the design year will be approximately fifteen (15) years following construction. (6) Summary analysis explaining: (a) 'The proposed access points for the project, their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation; (b) Future off-site road improvements for access, which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is responsible for their completion; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 16 • (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets; (d) How traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the PUD; (e) Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the development, if used; 10. Additional studies and plans: The City Planning Board and Zoning Commission or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed PUD; particul.arly if-the development=s compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; N/A 4. Reproducible Copy Requirements In addition to the above document, Site plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant shall submit the following for review purposes: A. One full size rolled (not folded) mylar of all plans and renderings; N/A B. One 82@ x 1 I" clear film reduction of all plans and renderings for reproduction and overhead projector use. N/A a` Reference to 18.54.060 A Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements@ of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance (7/02/90) Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or $4.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable industrial or commercial (includes professional business offices) floor area. Minimum fee after refund: $500.00 PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 17 • WBCI LP P. O. Box 1 l 060 Bozeman, MT 59719 October 26,2001 Mr.R. Dale Beland, LLC Planning Consultant 2023 Stadium Drive, Suite 2B Bozeman,MT S9715 Re; Baxter Maadows Phase I PUD Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plat Review Dear Dale: I certify that I am the owner of the subject property that is described in the attachcd legal description. s WBC,LP by JOW,Inc., general partner v r' by Gerald R.Williams, President Attachment 1 _ BAXTER-MrEA D rOWS BOZEMAN, MONTANA F 107 1 1 HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 1 SOURCE BOOK 1 0- 1 DiElaati:on Ptdt6dlivol Covenants and Regulations-. 1 1 aws oft-a6 Baxtdr-Mciad6W9 HonieoWne"s Assocta-t m 1 1 J Design Review Guidelines 1 And Regulations. 1 1 beclaration of,Protective- dovenant as Wo Wetta� Ar aw 1 . COLLABORATIVE _ 1 DESIGN Yesterday, Today &Tomorrow.. -ARCHITECTS= TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction tPart I Declaration of Residential Protective Covenants & Restrictions ...Purpose ' ...Abbreviations & Definitions Protective Covenants Combination & division of Sites ' Residential Use Mining Prohibited Home Site Preparation, Maintenance and Landscaping ' Outbuildings and Temporary Structures Exterior Improvements and Equipment Construction and Schedules t Building Permit and Compliance Bond Certificate of Compliance Common Areas & Definition ' Maintenance of Common Areas Rights of Access and Public Deeded Right-of-Way Ingress & Egress Utility Easement Installation and Maintenance of Utilities ' Domestic Pets Maintenance of Lots Noxious, Offensive or Hazardous Activities ' Signs Enforcement Action Perpetuity ' Amendment Severability Design Review Board ' Baxter Meadows Design Review Guidelines & Regulations Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association ' Part II By-Laws of the Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association Membership ...Membership ...Classes Operations ...Meetings ...Directors & Officers ...Rules & Regulations Design Review Board ...Composition ' ...Additional Procedures and Design Regulation ...Final Plans ...Additions, Changes, Refinishing ' ...Certificate of Compliance i 1 ! � 1 Part II Assessments 1 ...Levying Assessments ...Annual Assessments ...Capital Improvements and Compliance Assessments ...Emergency Assessments 1 Foreclosure and Executive Accumulation of Remedies Notices 1 Severability No Waiver Amendment or Termination 1 Part III Design Review Guidelines and Regulations Site Design Regulations 1 ...Topography & Site Features ...Utilities and Site Details ...Landscape Controls 1 Building Form Regulations ...Building Height ...Roof Form ' ...Exterior Wall Form Material and Detail Regulations ...Roof Materials ...Exterior Wall Materials 1 ...Exterior Windows and Doors ...Decks, Balconies, Terraces and Porches ...Building Color 1 Part IV Appendix ...Exhibit A— Master Plan 1 ...Plan Review Application ...Variance Application ...Compliance Bond 1 ...Certificate of Compliance Table of Contents Paoe 2 1 BAXTE M-- D-OWS , ,.;o., �-.. �.. �.- gOZE AN T! ONTA-M ,;--w^�-~� ...� ��� ���'n �ate� t��;.:.L_}.��`��� 'r .���;-,�w �i¢ t.{� � ' w�_.f+„* �`'tu�{�' a\'+` �`• 1 1 1 1 DEC LARATIO'k OF' RESIDENTIAL PROTECTIVE "' 1 COVENANTS A' RESTRICTION-S' J- hum 1 1 1 i 1 1 I. PURPOSE t Baxter Meadows is a unique mixed residential and commercial development annexed to the northwest portion of the City of Bozeman. Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. is the present owner of all of the property included within the boundaries of the Baxter Meadows Annexation-to ' the City of Bozeman. The primary goal of Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. is to create a development which creatively blends commercial and residential neighborhoods in terms of lot size, home scale and open space. Baxter Meadows strives to achieve this objective through ' the implementation of these Covenants, the Baxter Meadows Design Review Guidelines and Regulations ("Design Guidelines"), and the By-Laws of the Baxter Meadows Homeowners Association ("By-Laws"), which includes provisions regarding a Design Review Board and should be read and construed in conjunction with these Covenants. ' These Covenants and Restrictions are in addition to those requirements set forth in the City of Bozeman Zoning Regulations . In the event there is a conflict between the zoning regulations tand these Covenants or the Design Guidelines, the zoning regulations shall control. Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. hereby adopts the following Declaration of Protective ' Covenants and Restrictions for Baxter Meadows. 11. ABBREVIATIONS & DEFINITIONS ' The following abbreviations are used in this document: ' 1) The Baxter Meadows Design Review Board is referred to as the Design Board. 2) The Baxter Meadows Design Review Guidelines and Regulations are referred to as the Design Guidelines. ' 3) Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. is referred to as Declarant. 4) The Baxter Meadows Homeowners Association is referred to as the HOA. The following definitions shall apply to these covenants: ' 1) Class A member of the Homeowners Association shall be the owners of lots within Baxter Meadows as further defined in the By-Laws of the Baxter Meadows Homeowners' ' Association. 2) Class B members of the Homeowners Association shall be the Declarant, as further ' defined in the By-Laws of the Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association. 3) Grade: "Grade" means the lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground ' between the exterior wall of a building and a point five feet distance from the wall, or the lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground between the exterior wall of the building and the property line if it is less than five feet distance from the wall. If t walls are parallel to and within five feet of a public sidewalk, alley or other public way, the grade shall be the elevation of the sidewalk, alley or public way. "Finished surface of the ground" shall not include window wells, stairwells, or other similar features, but shall include features such as usable patio areas. ' 4) Lot: "Lot" means a piece, parcel, plot, tract or area of land occupied or capable of being occupied by one or more principal buildings, and the accessory buildings or uses ' customarily incidental to them, and including the open spaces required under this title, and having its,principal lot frontage on a street. tBaxter Meadows 1-1 1 � i 1 5) Lot Area: "Lot Area" means the total horizontal area within the boundary lines of a lot. 1 6) Lot, corner: A lot at a junction of and fronting on two or more intersecting streets. 7) Lot, interior: A lot other than a corner or through lot. 8) Lot, through: A lot having frontage on two parallel or approximately, parallel street. 1 9) Lot Coverage: The percentage of the lot area covered by buildings. 10) Lot Depth: The horizontal distance of a line measured at a right angle to the front lot line and running between the front lot line and rear lot line of a lot. 11) Lot line, front: In the case of an interior lot, a line separating the lot from the street, in the case of a corner lot, a line separating the narrowest street frontage of the lot from the 1 street and in the case of a through lot, a line separating the lot from the street from which a drive access may be permitted by the city. 1 12) Lot line, rear: A lot line which is opposite and most distant from the front lot line and, in the case of an irregular or triangular. ' Ill. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS A. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS It is the purpose of these Covenants to ensure that Baxter Meadows creatively blends residential and commercial uses into its surroundings, complements and enhances the natural ' environment and preserves and protects the interests and investment of the individual owners. These Covenants shall attach to and run with the land and shall constitute an equitable servitude upon the real property and every part of it, including all titles, interest and estates as ' may be held, conveyed, owned, claimed, devised, encumbered, used, occupied and improved. These Covenants are declared for the benefit of the residential property within Baxter Meadows as described and depicted on Exhibit A hereto, and for the benefit of each owner. They shall constitute benefits and burdens to Declarant and to all persons or entities hereafter acquiring any interest in the property. These covenants provide general restrictions while the Design Guidelines provide appropriate details in order to ensure compliance with these Covenants. The Design Guidelines must be carefully consulted and followed to ensure the requirements of these Covenants are met. B. COMBINATION AND DIVISION OF SITES Two contiguous lots may be combined to constitute one lot, and that lot will be treated as one lot. Three contiguous lots may be combined to constitute two lots, and those sites will be treated as two lots. Any combination of lots shall be done in accordance with Montana law. No lot may be further subdivided. C. RESIDENTIAL USE No lots designated as residential shall ever be occupied or used for any commercial or business purpose except for an office or studio fully contained within the [single family] residence, and shall-.not be used for meeting-the general public, customers or clients. Nothing contained herein limits the homeowner's ability to lease the dwelling for residential use. Lots designated as Live/Work properties shall be exempt from these restrictions. Baxter Meadows 1-2 ' w • Lots designated for LiveMork units may operate an office or commercial business in such a manner that the average neighbor, under normal circumstances, would not be aware of its existence with the exception of permitted signage. Business operations may be permitted if the following conditions are met: ' No use shall require exterior alterations or require changes to the existing mechanical and electrical systems. ■ There shall be no outside storage permitted. ' ■ No use shall create noise, dust, vibration, smell, smoke, glare, electrical interference, fire hazard or other nuisance not normally experienced in the area where the occupation exists. A home occupation is an occupational use customarily conducted entirely within a dwelling by ' the inhabitants thereof, which is clearly incidental and secondary to the use of that dwelling as living quarters and in connection with which there are: no on premises sales of products; no on-site employment of persons; no generation of pedestrian or vehicular traffic beyond that ' customary or incidental to residential use of the dwelling; no employees who do not reside on the premises; no use of commercial vehicles operated and/or owned by the resident or homeowner for deliveries to or from the premises; no signs or structures advertising the ' occupation; no excessive or unsightly storage of materials or supplies or working on autos, boats, or trailers other than normal maintenance of such vehicles or recreational equipment for the personal use of the resident or homeowner. For guidance, the following uses are examples of home occupations: the making of clothing; the giving of music lessons; a sole practitioner, professional practice; service or product ' providers who maintain a telephone and office within the residence but the services and products are provided and sold off the premises; the pursuit of artistic endeavors such as making of pottery, ceramics, paintings or bronzes, and the like, provided that the products are marketed and sold off the premises, and no foundries are located on the premises. Trailer homes and modular homes are prohibited. Recreational vehicles, motor or mobile homes, vehicle or other trailers, and boats must be kept in a garage or otherwise screened from ' view and are not permitted in front or side yard setbacks. RS Designated Zoning. One single family dwelling which may include one Accessory Dwelling ' Unit as described in the Design Guidelines is allowed per lot on those lots within RS designated zoning as described and depicted on Exhibit A hereto. Owners should carefully review the City of Bozeman Zoning Regulations to ensure compliance with all zoning regulations. All lots designated as residential within RS designated zoning will be used solely for private single family residential uses. Only single family homes with attached or non attached garages and Accessory Dwelling Units will be permitted in RS designated zoning. Each single family ' residence shall be a minimum of 2,200 square feet of finished or conditioned space, excluding garages and other storage spaces. ' R3 Designated Zoning. Cottage, bungalow, village, and traditional homes (less than 2,200 square feet) and condominiums or townhouses may be allowed on those lots within R3 designated zoning as described and depicted on Exhibit A hereto. Owners should carefully review the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with all zoning regulations. ' All homes and condominium or townhouse complexes shall be constructed from the particular plans as approved by Design Board prior to any construction on Lots within R3 designated zoning. ' Baxter Meadows 1-3 D. MINING PROHIBITED ' No prospecting, mining, quarrying, tunneling, excavating, extracting, or drilling for any substance on or within the earth, including oil, gas, hydrocarbons, minerals, gravels, sand, soil, rock, or earth shall be permitted except as necessary for the construction of buildings, roads or ' driveways, or fish ponds, ditches or other water ways as approved by the Design Review Board in open space or park areas and applicable governmental agencies. The HOA may approve irrigation walls on individual private lots. ' E. HOME SITE PREPARATION MAINTENANCE AND LANDSCAPING Each owner shall submit a landscape plan as set forth in the site regulations to the Design ' Review Board at the time the construction plans are submitted. Landscaping shall be done only as approved by the Design Review Board. Owners shall control all noxious weeds and shall destroy them according to county standards. Re-vegetation as approved in advance by the ' Design Board shall be required for all disturbed areas. Natural and native species are encouraged; non-native species may be restricted or prohibited. The owner must complete the restoration within 45 days following the construction of the residence or within such period as may be reasonably necessary as dictated by weather conditions, but not to extend one (1) year. F. OUTBUILDINGS AND TEMPORARY STRUCTURES ' No outbuildings shall be erected or maintained upon any lot before the start of construction of a residence and no trailer, mobile home, basement, shack, garage or other outbuildings shall be erected upon any part of the lot for use as a temporary or permanent residence. Temporary structures shall be removed within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. G. EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT Application to the Design Board for approval of pools, spas, hot tubs, or fire pits shall contain adequate details to establish sufficient abatement of equipment noise. If deep excavations are ' required for these improvements, a site evaluation by a geologist or soils engineer may be required. ' H. CONSTRUCTION AND SCHEDULES Any and all construction, alterations or improvements shall be subject to advance approval by ' the Design Board and shall be diligently worked on to completion and shall be completed within eighteen (18) months following commencement. No aspect of construction shall at any time impede, obstruct or interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic. No materials shall be placed or ' stored upon any lot more than thirty days (30) before commencement of construction or more than thirty (30) days following completion of construction as determined by the Design Board. No materials shall be placed or stored in right-of-way. ' Each construction site shall have a chemical toilet placed in a location as inconspicuous as possible. During any construction, the site shall be cleaned up weekly and shall be maintained free of trash. Debris and trash shall be removed from Baxter Meadows and shall not be placed ' or dumped on any common area or other property within Baxter Meadows. The owner shall be responsible to take necessary precautions to prevent debris from blowing off the construction site and shall clean up wind-blown debris both on and off the premises if debris does leave the ' premises notwithstanding the owner's precautions. Open burning of debris is not permitted. ' Baxter Meadows 1-4 1. BUILDING PERMITS AND COMPLIANCE BOND No building, structure, road, fence or improvement of any kind shall be erected, placed, altered, added to, reconstructed or permitted to remain on any site, and no construction activities or removal of trees or other vegetation shall be commenced until approved by the Design Board ' and the appropriate plans have been submitted to the City of Bozeman for building plan review percent and approval. A Compliance Bond may be required with a Security Deposit and will be held in an escrow account administered by the Design Board.. Upon completion of construction ' and landscaping of the sites the job will be reviewed by the Design Board, and when satisfactorily completed, the Compliance Bond will be released to the home owner. Some or all of the bond may be used by the Design Board to complete unfinished landscaping or other work needed on the site, if not satisfactorily completed by the owner of the site. ' J. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ' Before any owner may occupy or otherwise use a residence or other structure in Baxter Meadows, the owner must obtain a Certificate of Compliance from the Design Review Board in the form set forth 'in the Design Guidelines, acknowledging compliance with the Design ' Guidelines in the design and construction of any residence or other structure built within the boundaries of Baxter Meadows. In addition, the Owner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Bozeman. ' K. COMMON AREAS ' The design of Baxter Meadows incorporates Common Areas including the water delivery system as shown on the final plat of the Baxter Meadows annexation to the City of Bozeman, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. No improvements shall be constructed ' on such common areas except by the Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association. No gates or obstructions shall be placed upon or shall impede access to any common area. The HOA may provide temporary lighting or other holiday decorations within the common areas and street boulevards. ' L. MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS The HOA shall maintain the common areas, storm water management system, and easements. The HOA, as determined by the Design Board, may take such steps as are necessary to ensure that all shrubs, trees, and other vegetation do not block, interfere, or hinder the view from any ' residence. Such steps may include limiting the type of shrubs, trees, and other vegetation planted in the common areas, specifying the location of items to be planted, and/or removing shrubs, trees, and other vegetation in the event such items grow to a level that they block, interfere, or hinder the view from any residence or within traffic areas. Maintenance, repairs, and replacements of Common Area grounds and improvements, including the storm water management system, shall be at the expense of the HOA provided, however, if such damage is t caused by a negligent or tortuous act of any owner, members of such owner's family, guest or employee, then such owner shall be responsible and liable for all such damage. M. RIGHT OF ACCESS AND PUBLIC DEEDED RIGHT OF WAY INGRESS AND ' EGRESS A right of access shall be reserved and be immediate for making of emergency repairs in ' improvements and/or within the boundaries of each lot. These repairs may be needed to prevent property damage, personal injury, or continued property damage. Baxter Meadows 1-5 ' Public deeded right of way for general ingress and egress to each lot and to all common areas for the general use of all owners, their guests and the general public shall exist over all common ' areas, roads, and trails within Baxter Meadows. N. UTILITY EASEMENT An utility easement for such utilities as electricity, gas, sewer, communications, telephone, water, television, cable communications and other utility equipment is provided for within Baxter ' Meadows. All owners shall have the right to enter upon and excavate for electricity, gas, water and sewer in such easements upon written approval of the Homeowners Association. Vivid Networks will be the sole provider a fiber point enclosure to be mounted to an exterior wall of ' every home and business. This fiber optic cable carries telephone dial tone, video and audio communications, data, internet and television signals. Each homeowner may contact Vivid Networks to subscribe to the desired services. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment may be installed upon meeting the requirements elsewhere in these covenants and ' approval of the Homeowner's Association. Easements for ingress and egress and for utilities shall not be moved, deleted or restricted without the written approval of all affected lot owners. Disturbed land must be restored to a condition, as close as possible, to the natural condition of the land before work commenced. O. INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES ' Baxter Meadows shall cause the installation of electric power, telephone, and water line service to the junction of the main access road to each lot and lot driveways. Owners shall bear all ' responsibility and costs from such junction to home sites. All utilities of every nature shall be installed and maintained underground. Piping and wiring ' shall be concealed. Each owner shall be responsible for utility installation and maintenance in accordance with state and local regulations. P. DOMESTIC PETS No domestic animals or fowl shall be maintained on any lot except as provided herein. Not more than three generally recognized house or yard pets are permitted, provided that such animals shall at all times be restrained or leashed. Kennels with the appropriate license are t allowed only in rear yards. Excessive barking or other animal noises shall not be tolerated. If any animals are caught or identified chasing or otherwise harassing wildlife or people, or barking excessively, the HOA shall have the authority to have such animal(s) impounded at any ' available location, and may assess a penalty against the Owner of such animal(s) of not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) plus all costs of impoundment. If any such animal(s) are caught or identified chasing or harassing wildlife or people, or barking excessively on any additional ' occasion, the HOA shall have the authority to have such animal(s) impounded and may assess a penalty of not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) per animal, plus costs of impoundment. No Owner of any animals(s) impounded for chasing or harassing wildlife or people, or for barking excessively, shall have a right of action against the HOA or any member thereof, for the impoundment of any such animal(s). ' Q. MAINTENANCE OF LOTS _.�.Owners shall.maintain.lots..and .improvements in good repair and appearance at all times. All landscaping improvements and property shall be kept and maintained in good, clean, safe, ' sound, attractive, thriving and sightly condition and in good repair at all times. Baxter Meadows 1-6 ' R. NOXIOUS, OFFENSIVE OR HAZARDOUS ACTIVITIES ' No noxious, offensive, or hazardous activities shall be permitted upon any portion of the property nor shall anything be done on or placed upon any portion of the property which is or may become a nuisance to others. No light shall be produced upon any home site or other ' portion of the property which shall be unreasonably bright or cause unreasonable glare. No sound shall be produced on any home site or other portion of a property which is unreasonably loud or annoying, including but not limited to speakers, horns, whistles and bells or excessive ' barking or other animal noises. All the area of Baxter Meadows shall be controlled by these covenants which run with all the land for the benefit and use of owners. No off-road motorized travel shall be permitted. Use of ' snowmobiles within the boundaries of Baxter Meadows is also prohibited. Use of motorized vehicles is subject to ordinances and regulations of the City of Bozeman. Neither hunting nor the discharge of firearms shall be allowed in Baxter Meadows. ' S. SIGNS 1 No signs, billboards, posters, displays, advertisements or similar structures shall be permitted except as approved in advance in writing by the Design Board and through proper permitting procedures with City of Bozeman. ' T. ENFORCEMENT ACTION ' The provisions of these protective covenants may be enforced by individual owners, the HOA, Design Board, or Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. ' In the event of violation or threatened violation of any of these Covenants, or the Design Guidelines or any other rules or regulation adopted by the HOA, legal proceedings may be brought in a court of law or equity for injunctive relief and damages. In addition, an owner, the ' HOA, Design Board, or Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. may enforce these Covenants by serving notice in writing on the person or entity violating these Covenants which notice shall specify the offense, identify the location and demand compliance with the terms and conditions of these Covenants. Such notice shall be personally served. In the event personal service ' cannot be obtained after reasonable efforts, notice shall be posted at a conspicuous place on the property in question and a copy of the notice shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of the party or entity. ' No owner, the Design Board, the HOA, or Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. shall be liable to any person or entity for any entry, self help or abatement of a violation or threatened violation of ' these Covenants. All owners, invitees and guests shall be deemed to have waived any and all rights or claims for damages for any loss or injury resulting from such action except for intentionally wrongful acts. ' Enforcement of these covenants shall be by proceedings either at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate these Covenants; and the legal proceedings ' may be either to enjoin or restrain violation of the Covenants or to recover damages or both. In the event of action to enforce these Covenants, the prevailing party shall be entitled to costs and a reasonable attorney's fee. ' The failure by the Declarant or its assigns, the HOA, the Design Board or any lot owner to enforce any.-covenants .or.restrictions..contained herein shall in no event be deemed a waiver or in any way prejudice the right to enforce that Covenant at any time against any person breaking Baxter Meadows 1-7 the Covenant or any other Covenant breached thereafter or to collect damages for any subsequent breach of Covenants. ' Invalidation of any one of these Covenants by judgment or Court order shall in no way affect any of the other Covenants or provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. ' All of the above described real property and lots shall be subject to the restrictions and Covenants set forth herein whether or not there is a reference to the same in a deed or ' conveyance. A breach of any of the foregoing Covenants shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any ' mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value upon any site or portion of the real property or any improvements thereon. However, these Covenants shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any subsequent owner who acquired by foreclosure, trustee sale or otherwise, title to property within Baxter Meadows. ' U. PERPETUITY ' These Covenants shall continue in full force and effect and shall run with land as legal and equitable servitude in perpetuity unless amended or terminated as set forth herein. ' V. AMENDMENT These Covenants shall remain in effect until amended or terminated. The Covenants, or any ' portion thereof, may be amended, terminated or supplemented at any time by the execution of a written document containing the terms of the amendment, supplement or termination of any of the Covenants, duly acknowledged by a Notary Public, and recorded with the office of the ' Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder, executed (1) by the owners of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots in Baxter Meadows based on one vote per lot, or (2) by the Board of Directors and President of the HOA acknowledging the affirmative vote of three-fourths (3/4) of the total votes of all Class A and Class B members of the HOA. If one or more lots has been combined, the owner thereof shall be entitled to one vote and/or one signature for each original lot which created the combined lot. If there is more than one owner for an individual lot, each owner must execute the amendment, supplement or termination document to count for one vote towards the ' seventy-five percent (75%) total. W. SEVERABILITY tCaptions and paragraph headings are designated herein as a matter of convenience. A determination of invalidity of any portion of these Covenants shall not in any manner affect the ' other portions or provisions. X. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD tThe Design Review Board shall be constituted in accordance with the By-Laws of the Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association. The Design Review Board shall have the authority and ' responsibility as provided herein and in the By-Laws for the Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association. Y. BAXTER MEADOWS DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS ' _... ... . ..._The_..Design..Rev.iew..Board...shall._conduct business as provided herein and as set forth in the BAXTER MEADOWS DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS. In the event of ' Baxter Meadows 1-8 ' any conflict between the Design Guidelines and these Covenants, the Design Guidelines shall prevail. ' Z. BAXTER MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION ' The Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association shall be constituted, shall conduct its business, and shall have the authority and responsibility as provided herein and in the BY-LAWS OF THE BAXTER MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. In the event of a conflict between the By-Laws and these covenants, the By-Laws shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this day of t 2002. ' BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. Gerald R. Williams, President ' STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. COUNTY OF GALLATIN ) 1 This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2002, by Gerald R. Williams, as President of Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. Notary Public for the State of Montana ' Printed Name: Residing at: (SEAL) My Commission Expires: 1 Baxter Meadows 1-9 BAXTER- M-EADOWS_ },. ,,_" FmBOZEMAN MO]VTANA {$ ��^ 1 �.�1\ � " �•r1 .,yk, ��:�J f ,R$ i�% ��. ..� � r�R �-, ,. � � �. `.t �� ��i M i � •y 1 i PART I I 1 0 1 BY-LAWS OF THE BAXTER MEADOWS 1 HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION till liall lit i i 1 1 1 1 Q. . 1 • 1 Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. is the present owner in fee simple of all the property included within the boundaries of Baxter Meadows Annexation to the City of Bozeman. Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. does hereby adopt the following By-Laws of the Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association. Baxter Meadows has also adopted and recorded a Declaration of Residential Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Baxter Meadows (the "Covenants"), and the Baxter Meadows Design Review Guidelines and Regulations (the "Design Guidelines") which operate and should be construed in conjunction with these By-Laws. I• MEMBERSHIP A. MEMBERSHIP Every owner of property in Baxter Meadows shall be a member of the Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association (the "HOA"). Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separate from the ownership of any lot subject to assessment. Each lot owner shall be responsible for advising the HOA of his or her acquisition of ownership and his or her current address. Each owner shall be bound by these By-Laws and the duly passed Resolutions of the HOA. The HOA may be incorporated as a non-profit homeowners' association. B. CLASSES There shall be two classes of members in the HOA, Class A and Class B members, which are defined as follows: CLASS "A": Class A membership shall be all lot owners with the exception of Class B members named below. Class A members shall be entitled to one vote for each lot owned. If one or more original lots have been combined, the owner thereof shall be entitled to one vote for each original lot which created the combined lot. When more than one person holds an interest in any individual lot, all such persons shall be members. The vote for such a lot shall be exercised as such owners among themselves determine, but in no event shall more than one (1) vote be cast with respect to any lot. CLASS "B": The Class B member shall be Baxter Meadows Development, L.P., who shall be entitled to seventy-five (75) votes. Class B membership shall cease and be converted to Class A membership when 3/4 of the lots being of the original RS and R3 residential lots in Baxter Meadows are sold to third parties. Thereafter, Baxter ' Meadows Development, L.P. shall become a Class A member and shall be entitled to one vote for each unsold platted lot. II. OPERATIONS A. MEETINGS Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized hereunder shall be mailed to all members not less than 10 days nor more than 45 days in advance of the meeting. A general description of the items to be considered at such a meeting shall be contained in the notice. At such meeting called, the presence of members or of proxies entitled to cast fifty-one percent (51%) of all the votes of Class A and Class B members combined shall ' constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meeting shall be one-half ('/2) -of'the required'quorum at the preceding meeting. No such subsequent ' meeting shall be held more than sixty (60) days following the preceding meeting. Baxter Meadows 2-1 ' B. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS ' Members of the HOA shall annually elect three (3) Directors from its membership who shall be responsible for the overall operations of the HOA as described herein. The Directors shall also have the power and responsibility of setting an annual budget. Such Directors shall be elected by a majority of the total votes of Class A and Class B members represented in person or by proxy at an annual meeting of the HOA, or in the absence of an annual meeting, at any meeting at which a quorum is present. The Directors shall serve a term of one year, but may be ' removed from time to time at any regularly called meeting of the HOA by a vote of two thirds (2/3) of the total votes of Class A and Class B members represented at any meeting in person or by proxy at the meeting, provided that a quorum is present, or immediately, upon termination ' of the Director's membership. Nothing shall prohibit the re-election of any Director for consecutive terms. The Directors are authorized to manage the business of the HOA and are authorized to take such actions as shall be necessary and reasonable to carry out the functions of the HOA. The Directors shall elect a president and secretary/treasurer from among the Directors or the members to serve as the officers of the HOA. The Directors may also elect such other officers as they deem necessary. The duties of these officers shall be established by ' the Board of Directors. The initial Board of Directors shall consist of Gerald R. Williams, Claudia Metzler and Jeff Kanning, AIA, who shall serve until new directors are duly elected by the HOA. Gerald R. ' Williams shall serve as the president of the HOA and Claudia Metzler as secretary/treasurer, until successors are duly elected by the HOA. ' C. RULES AND REGULATIONS The HOA may adopt such additional rules and regulations as shall be reasonable and ' necessary to carry out its authority and duties under the terms of these By-Laws, the Covenants, or the Design Guidelines, provided that such additional rules and regulations are first adopted by a majority of the Board of Directors and then submitted to a meeting of the HOA for a vote by delivering notice of the meeting together with a copy of the additional rules and regulations to the last known address of each lot owner at least thirty days before the meeting. Additional rules and regulations shall be adopted by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote of the total ' votes of all Class A and Class B members represented in person or by proxy at any meeting at which a quorum is present and all members have been notified that such rules or regulations will be up for discussion. Additional rules and regulations shall be effective 30 days after the ' same are executed and recorded by the Board of Directors of the HOA with the Clerk and Recorder for Gallatin County, Montana, and mailed to each lot owner at their last known address. ' III• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD A. COMPOSITION. The Design Review Board for Baxter Meadows shall initially be composed of Gerald R. Williams, Claudia Metzler and Jeff Kanning, AIA. These members shall serve until twenty-five ' lots in Baxter Meadows have been conveyed to third parties. After that time, the Design Review Board shall be composed of not more than three (3) members selected by the Board of Directors of Baxter Meadows Homeowners'Association. Two (2) of the members of the Design ' Review Board shall be members of Baxter Meadows Homeowners' Association, and one (1) shall be a disinterested, outside third party. Each member of the Design Review Board shall serve for a term of one year, unless re-appointed. Each member of the board shall have one vote. Action approved by the vote of two of the three members shall be the act of the Design Review Board. A written permanent record shall be Baxter Meadows 2-2 ' kept of all action taken by the Board which shall include the date, the action taken, and a short statement of the reason for such actions. ' B. ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES AND DESIGN REGULATIONS ' The Design Review Board shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of the Design Guidelines, and shall have the authority to adopt construction regulations and such other regulations as shall be reasonable and necessary to exercise its authority and its duties set forth ' in this Declaration, the Design Guidelines, the Covenants and the By-Laws. Any additional procedures or design regulations adopted by the Design Review Board shall not be effective until thirty days after mailing a copy of the additions to the last known address of the current site owners. ' C. FINAL PLANS Approval by the Design Review Board neither represents, nor shall the Design Review Board ' offer any opinion as to whether plans and specifications conform to building codes or State and Local Regulatory requirements. Approval does not include examination for errors or omissions. Approval granted by the Design Review Board for any plans shall remain effective only in the ' event that construction is commenced within six (6) months of the date of the approval, after which time the approval shall lapse and be of no further force or effect. ' D. ADDITIONS, CHANGES, REFINISHING No additions, changes, (including remodeling) or changes of any portion of the home site except t the interior structures of the residence shall be commenced without approval of the Design Review Board. The approval shall be sought by submissions of final working plans and drawings. No preliminary plans need be submitted. tE. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ' Before any owner may occupy or otherwise use a residence or other structure in the Baxter Meadows, the owner must obtain a Certificate of Compliance from the Design Review Board in the form set forth in the Design Guidelines, acknowledging compliance with the Design Guidelines in the design and construction of any residence or other structure built within the boundaries of Baxter Meadows. F. COMMUNICATIONS ' Communications with the Design Review Board shall be initiated by directing inquiries and submissions to: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Baxter Meadows ' P.O. Box 11060 Bozeman, Montana 59715 Baxter Meadows 2-3 ' IV. ASSESSMENTS tA. LEVYING ASSESSMENTS The Directors shall have the authority to levy assessments on each lot and the owner thereof for ' the purposes of improvement, repair and maintenance of roads, common areas, snow removal, administration, accounting and legal fees. There shall be three types of assessments: "Annual Assessments", which shall be a pro-rata portion of anticipated expenses for the coming year ' based upon the budget prepared by the Directors; "Capital Improvement and Compliance Assessments" approved by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of the total votes of Class A and Class B members; and "Emergency Assessments" levied at the discretion of the Directors without ' submitting the assessment to a vote of the members, in order to rectify and/or address emergencies. Each type of assessment is described below. The total assessment shall be divided and paid equally by the owners of each lot, including unsold lots owned by Developer, ' regardless of the size of the lot. The Owner of each lot, hereby covenants and agrees, by the acceptance of a deed therefore ' (regardless of whether it shall be so expressed in such deed) to all matters set forth in these By-Laws, the Covenants, the Design Guidelines and the Design Board Declaration, and to pay to the HOA such assessments as the HOA shall levy against each lot. No owner shall be entitled to a reduced assessment because such owner does not reside upon the property or ' does not use the roads or other amenities. No owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use or abandonment of his or her lot or because he or she believes that these By-Laws are not being properly enforced. Assessments shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the date of the notice of such assessment. An assessment shall be a charge upon the land and shall be a continuing lien ' upon the property and lot upon which the assessments are made. Each assessment shall also be a personal obligation of the person who is the owner of the property at the time the assessment falls due. ' Upon delivery of the notice of assessment to the owner, the assessment shall be a lien upon the owner's lot until paid. The HOA may record a notice of the lien with the Clerk and Recorder of ' Gallatin County, Montana. In the event of non-payment within thirty (30) days after recording the notice of the lien, the HOA may foreclose the lien in a manner set forth under Montana law for the foreclosure of liens against real property. The recording of the notice of lien shall be notice to all third parties of the assessment outstanding against the lot. ' The HOA may bring an action at law against the owners personally obligated to pay the same or may foreclose the lien against the property. In the event of an action to collect a past due ' assessment, the HOA shall be entitled to recover any or all of the following costs, in addition to the amount of the past due assessment: (1) the costs of filing the lien including interest at the rate of the then prevailing prime rate of interest plus two percent (2%) from the date due; (2) all ' costs of the action; (3) reasonable attorneys fees incurred in preparation for filing the lien; (4) reasonable attorneys fees incurred in preparing and prosecuting the action. ' The sale, transfer or encumbrance of any lot shall not affect the assessment lien or the personal liability of the owner except to the extent such lien is extinguished by Montana law. No sale, transfer or encumbrance shall relieve such lot from liability for any assessments thereafter ' becoming due or from the lien thereof, provided that if the assessment lien has not been recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, a good faith purchaser or encumbrancer without actual notice of'the outstanding assessment shall take the property free ' of the lien. Baxter Meadows 2-4 B. ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS The owner of each lot, including Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. with respect to all unsold lots, shall be assessed annually for a pro-rata portion of anticipated expenses for the coming year based upon the budget prepared by the Directors. After the initial Annual Assessment is set, the assessment against any lot shall not be increased more than 20 percent (20%) per year without the approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the total votes of Class A and Class B members represented at any meeting in person or by proxy, unless the increase is required to comply with ' a mandatory rule, regulation, or order of municipal, county, state or federal government. The Annual Assessments provided for herein shall commence as to each lot on the date of ' closing on the sale of such lot from Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. to a third party. The Board of Directors shall fix the amount of the annual assessment against each lot based upon a budget of the estimated expenses of the HOA for each year. At least thirty (30) days in advance of the due date of each annual assessment, written notice of the annual assessment and the due date shall be mailed to every lot owner at their last known address. The due dates shall be established by the Board of Directors. The HOA shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by the Directors of the HOA, setting forth whether the assessment of a specified lot has been paid. C. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS ' i) Capital Improvements. The HOA may levy assessments for construction or reconstruction or unexpected repair or replacement of a capital improvement or equipment for ' use consistent with the purposes of the HOA. ii) Compliance. The HOA may levy assessments for purposes of defraying costs, ' including legal fees to enforce any protective covenant or to exercise any authority or responsibility granted to the HOA, including but not limited to enforcement of all rules and regulations adopted by the HOA, or to pay for the necessary repair or maintenance of a property ' or residence which an owner has otherwise refused to repair or maintain. D. EMERGENCY ASSESSMENTS Emergency assessments shall be levied only to meet the costs and expenses precipitated by a condition which must be remedied promptly to ensure the safe and adequate discharge of the responsibilities of the HOA. This may include items which would otherwise be considered as Capital Improvement and Compliance Assessments, if the Board determines (1) that the capital improvement or compliance action is absolutely necessary; and (2) that circumstances make it impractical to put the matter to a vote of the members due to timing or other constraints. Any improvements or other work required by local, state, or federal agencies which must be completed in a timely fashion and cannot be included in the Annual Assessment for the following year shall also be considered Emergency Assessments. ' V• FORECLOSURE AND EXECUTION As further security for payment of assessments levied by the HOA, the HOA may, in addition to foreclosing upon the lien as described above, execute upon a judgment through all remedies provided at law and equity, including sale of the liened parcel in accordance with the laws of the ' State of Montana. At such a sale, the HOA may bid upon and acquire such lot. Baxter Meadows 2-5 ' VI. ACCUMULATION OF REMEDIES All remedies provided under the Covenants, these By-Laws, and the Design Guidelines, as well as all of the rules and regulations of the HOA and remedies and authority granted to individual owners to enforce covenants shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to, and not in ' substitution of, all other rights and remedies which the HOA may have under law. In addition, any owner, Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. or the HOA, may bring an action ' for damages for injunctive relief to abate a nuisance, to restrain any threatened or prospective violation or continuing violation of any portion of these By-Laws, the Covenants, or the Design Guidelines. In any such enforcement action, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all ' costs, court costs, costs of discovery and reasonable attorney fees. VII. NOTICES ' Each owner shall register with the HOA, a current mailing address and shall promptly notify the HOA of any change. All notices, demands, and other communication to any owner shall be ' sufficient for all purposes if personally served of if delivered by postage pre-paid United States Mail, Certified, return receipt requested, addressed to the owner at the last mailing address registered with the HOA. ' VIII. SEVERABILITY Invalidity or un-enforceability of any provision of this instrument determined by a Court shall not ' affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision. IX. NO WAIVER Failure to enforce any provision, restriction, covenant or condition of these By-Laws, the Covenants or the Design Guidelines shall not create a waiver of any such provision, restriction, covenant or condition or of any other provision, restriction, covenant or condition. X. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION ' These By-Laws shall remain in effect until amended or terminated which shall occur only upon the affirmative vote of three fourths (3/4) of the total votes of all Class A and Class B members of the HOA. Baxter Meadows 2-6 1 ! • 1 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the By-Laws have been executed this day of , 2002. 1 i BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. 1 1 Gerald R. Williams, Director 1 STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. 1 COUNTY OF GALLATIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on by ' Gerald R. Williams, as Director of Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. 1 Notary Public for the State of Montana 1 Print Name: Residing at: (SEAL) My Commission Expires: 1 1 1 ' Baxter Meadows 2-7 __ -._ - BAXTER.- MEADOW- B OZEMAN, MONTANA { .� � ...� �.._s•�1�,r�.a��`".3..'L' �.��ia:�.Li.oaJ�.sLrl��i �'� ���..�4 �' �-'. .� t.�1��t$ � `}s 1 i 1 PART III 1 0 ' DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS 1 ❑ 1 1 1 I SITE DESIGN REGULATIONS ' The integration of,buildings into the landscape of Baxter Meadows is essential to the success and appearance of the community. Site Design Regulations specifically serve to protect and enhance the natural landscape, stream corridors, view sheds and natural habitat. ' A. TOPOGRAPHY AND SITE FEATURES ' 1. Response to Character of Land Form: Development Areas shall be designated upon all new sites in order to assure that each building site responds to the existing topography, tree masses and adjacent properties. All site plans must indicate surface drainage patterns. 2. Relationship to Open Space: Estate Homes The Master Plan recognized the importance of trails and open space within the Baxter Meadows community. Buildings shall be located in a manner that t preserves the character of the open space within the development. When an entirely open site is developed, buildings shall be organized in a cluster that diminishes the scale and impact of the building in the landscape. In addition, ' indigenous landscape materials shall be introduced to minimize the exposure of the building. Manicured lawns shall be separated from the established native vegetation with landscape materials. ' 3. Stream Corridor Protection: ' All buildings and improvements shall maintain a minimum setback of 50 feet from the annual high water line of all streams, rivers, creeks and water courses within all development districts of Baxter Meadows. Uses within the stream setback shall be limited to planting of native riparian vegetation, maintenance of existing ' non-native vegetation, and the control and maintenance of noxious weeds. The removal of existing native vegetation within the stream shed protection area is not permitted. Refer to the Declaration of Protective Covenants as to Wetland ' Areas for tall requirements. 4. Driveways & Parking: Site access, when entered from the street, shall be perpendicular to the street. Parking areas and garage doors shall not be the primary visual element of any ' residence. Landscaping materials shall be used to diminish the impact of the entry to the garage. All parking shall be within the lot boundary, off public and private rights-of-way. No driveway or access shall be allowed to encroach into the side yard setbacks other than those on shared driveway easements filed of record. The construction and maintenance of all driveways and culverts shall be ' responsibility of the owner. Driveways and parking areas shall be crowned and sloped for adequate drainage and safety. ' Driveway and parking surfaces shall be constructed of concrete paving units, _. stone cobbles,.-asphalt..or...concrete. Any other material shall be approved by the BMHOA. Materials shall restrict weed growth and maintain a clearly defined ' Baxter Meadows 3-1 1 � � 1 edge between the landscaped area and the driveway surface. Materials shall withstand deterioration from winter snow plowing and erosion. 1 Driveways shall be limited in width to 14 feet minimum and 16 feet maximum at the intersecting street. Drives can be expanded to 24 feet at turn-around areas 1 and parking structures. Maximum driveway grades shall not exceed 1:20 for the first 20 feet from the roadway, and shall not exceed 1:10 slope beyond. 1 5. Privacy Screens and Retaining Walls: Privacy screens may be used in conjunction with a hot tub or sunning deck. The ' screening shall be consistent with the overall design, construction and materials of the existing building. Privacy screens shall not be taller than the edge of the roof eaves, and shall not be longer than 16 feet in uninterrupted length. 1 Retaining walls shall be an integral part of the overall design of the site and building. Retaining walls shall not be greater than 4 feet in height, or 24 feet in uninterrupted length. Retaining walls can also be used as a screening device to 1 obscure service areas such as the view of a driveway from the main road. Retaining walls shall be constructed of wood, stone, or approved masonry products, and shall blend into the contour of the existing landscape. 1 6. Walkways, Paths and Trails: 1 Walkways, paths and trails introduce places for pedestrians within the built and natural environment. The size and character of such paths shall respond to the surrounding buildings and site in the form of material, scale and configuration. Paving units, stone, textured or exposed aggregate concrete and wood shall be 1 the only acceptable materials. Detailed drawings of paths shall be required as a part of the Final Plan review requirements. 1 B. UTILITIES AND SITE DETAILS 1. Utilities: 1 All utilities (natural gas, electric, telephone and television cable) shall be installed underground. No antenna or satellite dish shall be installed on any structure or 1 lot so that it is visible from any street. 18" satellite dishes shall not be required to be screened from adjacent lots. Larger satellite dishes are not permitted. 1 Meters shall be placed in a location so as to be accessible to the meter reader and yet not visible from adjoining roadways. All conduit wires servicing the meter are to be beneath the exterior wall sheathing or enclosed. Meters, transformers 1 and other utility boxes shall be concealed with landscaping. 2. Radon: 1 Radon gas is a hazard found in all soil types throughout the country, and should be anticipated in Baxter Meadows. The owner and architect shall contract an EPA certified installer who shall be responsible for introducing mitigation 1 measures into the design of the building, conducting appropriate tests for radon, - and activating.the.system if necessary. 1 Baxter Meadows 3-2 � s I3. Wood Storage: I Firewood shall be stored outdoors shall be stacked in an enclosed area, such as a garage, covered porch, or structure designed for the storage of wood. Such structures shall be architecturally compatible with the material and color of the ' primary structure, and shall be integrated into the design of the building. 4. Garbage and Refuse Disposal: ' Trash, garbage and other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All equipment, garbage cans, wood piles, compost piles or storage piles shall be screened or concealed from view of other dwellings and Common Areas. ' Sanitary containers may be placed for collection only on collection days. C. LANDSCAPE CONTROLS FOR BUNGALOW, VILLAGE, TRADITIONAL HOME ' STYLES, CONDOMINIUMS AND LIVE/WORK UNITS 1. Definitions: tCaliper: The diameter of the trunk measured six inches above ground level up to and including four inch caliper size, and measured twelve inches above ground ' level if the measurement taken at six inches above ground level exceeds four inches. If a tree is of a multi-trunk variety, the caliper of the tree is the average caliper of all of its trunks. Corner Lot: A lot located adjacent to two public streets where those two streets intersect at a perpendicular angle. ' Mulched Bed: An area within a yard with no turf and 3" minimum depth landscape mulch. Landscape mulches include but are not limited to river rock (typ) or landscape bark (typ) etcetera. Yard: A space on the same lot with a principal building, which is open and unoccupied from the ground upward or from the ground downward other than by steps, walks, terraces, driveways, lamp posts and similar structures, and unobstructed by structures. Yard, Front: A yard extending across the full width of the lot between two side lot lines the depth of which is the least distance between the street right-of-way and the front building line. ' Yard, Rear: A yard extending across the full width of the lot between the two side lot lines and between the real line and a parallel line tangent to the rear of ' the principal building and the depth of which is the least distance between the rear lot line and the parallel line. Yard, Side: A yard extending between the front building line and the rear building ' line, the width of which is the least distance between the side lot line and the nearest part of the principal building. Baxter Meadows 3-3 ' 2. Installation: t "Note: Baxter Meadows Development when used in the following paragraphs represents the current development L.P. Beginning with 75% property sales, the responsibilities of Baxter Meadows Development becomes those of Baxter Meadows Homeowners Association (HOA) as described in the Declaration of Residential Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Baxter Meadows. ' Street Trees: Baxter Meadows Development shall control the installation of street and boulevard trees. Sodding: ' Bungalow and Village Style Home: Sodding of front and side yards to fences and in any property right-of-way shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. In the case of corner lots where no fences occur, the sodding shall extend to a point 10' into the side yard from the front yard. ' Traditional Style Homes: Sodding of front yards and in any property right-of-way shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. ' Condominiums and Live/Work Units: Sodding of front, side and rear yards as well as any property right-of-way shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. On any yards where sodding has not been provided by Baxter Meadows Development, the homeowners are responsible for sodding or seeding within one t (1) year of property purchase. Mulched Beds: ' Bungalow, Village and Traditional Style Homes: Front yards will be installed with 4-8 shrubs within a mulched bed and shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. Homeowners are encoraged to install similar beds in rear and side yards to reduce water and mowing damage to the architectural siding. ' Traditional Style Homes: Front yards will be be installed with 4-8 shrubs within a mulched bed and shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. In addition, each home will have a 18"-24" min. wide mulched bed around its perimeter in the rear and side yards to reduce water and mowing damage to the architectural siding. Condominium and Live/Work Units: Front, rear and side yard landscaping shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. Each unit will have 18% 24" min. wide mulched bed surrounding its perimeter to reduce water and mowing damage to the architectural siding. All property owners may further plant shrubs on their properties in mulched bed areas given that shrubs do not exceed the width of mulched bed area. Shrubs must be planted within a newly established mulched bed a minimum of 6" :......:....._._ diameter wider-than-the.mature diameter size of the shrub planted. Perennials Baxter Meadows 3-4 ' and annuals may be planted within mulched beds provided they are within bed edges by 6" or more and are 6" or more away from architectural structures. Trees: ' Each homeowner with the exception of Condominium and Live/Work Property owners, shall be responsible for the installation of one 1.5" minimum trunk caliper shade tree within 18 months of purchasing property in Baxter Meadows Recommended species include: Ash (Fraxinus), Honeylocust (Gleditsia Triacanthos), Linden (Tilia), Locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia), Maple (Acer), Mountain Ash (Sorbus Aucaparia), Oak (Quercus), Walnut (Juglans Nigra). ' Trees installed by homeowner are to be planted within property lines. Bungalow and Village Style Home: Trees must not be planted in front yards where they may conflict with utility lines. Trees must be located in back yard areas in designated Landscape Pods. Traditional Style Homes: Will be allotted (3) small shade trees of 1-2" caliper or one 5' high conifer (evergreen) by Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. The required installation of a shade tree within 18 months of purchasing property in Baxter Meadows may be substituted for one non-canopy tree (evergreen/conifer). The non-canopy tree must have a min. height of 5'. Heights are measured from the top of the root ball to the plants highest point. Trees installed by homeowners may be planted in front, side or rear yards as long as they are not in confloct with the utility lines and are on the owner's property. 3. Maintenance: Maintenance includes lawn care, irrigation and weed control. Mulched beds shall be weed controlled by a consistent spray regime or manual weeding. ' Pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, etc. If used shall be applied in strict accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and all applicable laws and in accordance with USDA and the EPA. ' Bungalow and Village Style Homes: Every homeowner shall be responsible for the care of his or her lot excluding front and side yards up to fence lines where Baxter Meadows Development will be responsible for maintaining. In the case of corner lots where no fences occur, the maintenance by Baxter Meadows Development shall extend to a point 10' into the side yard from the front yard. ' Traditional Style Home: Every homeowner shall be responsible for the care of his or her entire lot excluding only the street right-of-way. Condominiums and Live/Work Units: Baxter Meadows Development shall be responsible for the landscape maintenance of each property including the right- of-way. 4. Irrigation Installation and Maintenance: Baxter Meadows Development shall be responsible for the installation of .irrigation.systems with in.the-areas.descnbed below: ' Baxter Meadows 3-5 Bungalow and Village Style Homes: Baxter Meadows shall install and maintain irrigation systems in front yards, right-of-ways, boulevards and side yards from the front yard to fence line. In the case of corner lots where no fences occur, the irrigation shall extend to a point 10' into the side yard from the front yard. ' Traditional Style Homes: Baxter Meadows shall install and maintain irrigation in front yards and right-of-ways. ' Condominiums and Live/Work Unit. Baxter Meadows shall install and maintain Irrigation in front, side and rear yards as well as right-of-ways. ' Irrigation systems controlled by Baxter Meadows Homeowners Association will be separately metered. 5. Landscape Controls for Estate Style Homes: ' Installation: ' Street Trees: Baxter Meadows Development shall control the installation of street and boulevard trees. ' Sodding: Estate Style Homes: Sodding of front yards and in any property right-of-way ' shall be the responsibility of Baxter Meadows Development. On any yards where sodding has not been provided by Baxter Meadows ' Development, the homeowners are responsible for sodding or seeding within one (1) year of property purchase. Mulched Beds: Each home shall have 18"-24" min. wide mulched bed ' surrounding its perimeter to reduce water and mowing damage to the architectural siding. ' All property owners may plant shrubs on their properties in mulched bed areas given that shrubs do not exceed the width of mulched bed area. Shrubs must be planted within a newly established mulched bed a minimum of 6" diameter wider ' than the mature diameter size of the shrub planted. Perennials and annuals may be planted within mulched beds provided they are within bed edges by 6" or more and are 6" or more away from architectural structures. tTrees: Trees installed by homeowner are to be planted within property lines. ' 6. Irrigation Installation and Maintenance: Baxter Meadows Development shall be responsible for the installation of irrigation systems within the areas described below: Estate Style Homes: Baxter Meadows shall install and maintain irrigation in front yards and right-of-ways. Irrigation systems..controlled.by Baxter Meadows Homeowners Association will be separately metered. Baxter Meadows 3-6 1 ' ll. BUILDING FORM REGULATIONS The intent of the following building design regulations are to develop architectural unity within the districts of Baxter Meadows while allowing for the vitality of individual expression. ' A. BUILDING HEIGHT 1. Residential Buildings: Building heights within all residential areas of the BMHOA shall be limited to a maximum of 38 feet except areas designated for Live/Work units shall be limited to a maximum of 55 feet. Building height shall be measured from the highest ridge to the adjacent grade. On complex buildings with multiple heights, the building height shall be ' determined by calculating the highest ridge line of the building, and measuring to the average of the highest and lowest finished grade. The final elevation of the finished surface materials, whether soil, paving, or decking shall be indicated ' as the finished grade, and shall be shown on the Architect's drawings. With the approval of the BMHOA, chimneys, cupolas, and other architectural features may exceed the given height limitations by no more than 4 feet. B. ROOF FORM The architecture within Baxter Meadows shall complement and respond to the natural qualities of Bozeman. The consistency and compatibility of roof shapes, pitches and materials will contribute significantly to the continuity of the character t of Baxter Meadows. The following design regulations have been developed to allow for distinct building forms while addressing the character of the entire community. Exterior walls shall not exceed 40 feet in length without a change of orientation such as the introduction of dormers, projected bays, or recesses greater than 2 feet. When refining roof forms consideration shall also be given to the prevention of excessive snow build-up and snow shedding. 1. Shape and Pitch: ' When examining roof shapes and pitches for buildings within Baxter Meadows, designers should consider the simple shapes and pitches of buildings found within traditional neighborhoods. Gable, hip, and modified hip roofs shall be the only acceptable roof forms. Shed roofs shall not be major roof forms. Mansard roofs, pseudo-mansard roofs, curvilinear roofs, and A-frame roofs shall not be allowed for any roof form. ' Variation in orientation of the dominant roof form is essential to the successful design of large buildings. Dominant roof forms shall not exceed 40 feet in length without a change in orientation or introduction of dormers. Within al I...Development.Areas roof slopes shall be a minimum of 6:12 and a maximum of 12:12. Secondary roofs may be gable, shed, hip, and modified hip ' Baxter Meadows 3-7 roofs with pitches not less than 4:12 when attached to major building forms. Such roof forms shall be integral to the building or roof form. ' The BMHOA reserves the right to waive the minimum or maximum roof pitch requirement when, in its sole judgment, a lower or steep roof pitch is more appropriate for the design of a building, and does not compromise the integrity of the development district. This privilege may be exercised by the BMHOA without relinquishing its right to enforce the minimum or maximum requirements on other ' projects. 2. Entry Definition, Overhangs & Fascia: ' Snow in the Bozeman area often builds up on roof surfaces and slides off at irregular intervals. Such slides can damage property, decks, balconies and even injure people. No roof without adequate protection from snow slides shall slope toward driveways, sidewalks, porches, decks, balconies or any other areas that may be damaged or cause injury through the shedding of snow or ice from the roof. Entrances shall be specifically expressed and protected with adequate overhangs. All roofs shall have overhangs of at least 16 inches. All fascia ' materials shall be a minimum of 6 inches. 3. Dormers and Secondary Roofs: ' Dormers and secondary roofs are often necessary to add interest and scale to major roof areas and to make habitable use of the attic space within the roof. ' Dormers and secondary roofs shall be gable, shed, hip, and modified hip roofs and may be stacked in multiple forms. ' 4. Skylights and Solar Collectors: When designing the location of skylights, consideration shall be given to both the interior and exterior appearance of the unit. Locations shall also be coordinated ' with window and door locations. Skylights shall be located away from valleys, ridges and all other areas where drifting snow may hinder the performance and safety of the unit. Skylights shall be of high quality, insulated, double pane construction. Solar collectors shall be integrated into the overall roof design, and shall be ' placed flush with the slope of the roof or wall of the building. 5. Chimney Composition, Proportion and Materials: ' Chimneys, flues and vents can be used to create visual contrast to the dominant roof forms of the buildings within Baxter Meadows. All flues shall be enclosed with a chimney cap and fitted with a spark arrestor. No exposed metal or clay flues shall be allowed. All chimney forms shall relate to the overall building and shall be covered with stone, stucco or wood siding materials to match exterior finishes of the building. tHuilding.uents..and.flues-for.such functions as ventilation and exhaust shall be consolidated into enclosures wherever possible and shall typically be concealed ' Baxter Meadows 3-8 ' from public view. Place roof penetrations on the rear side of the house whenever possible. All exposed metal shall be painted in a color compatible with the color ' scheme of the house. Attic openings, soffit vents, foundation louvers, or other direct openings in outside walls, overhangs or roofs shall be covered with non- combustible, corrosion-resistant metal mesh. ' C. EXTERIOR WALL FORM ' Exterior Wall surfaces shall be no longer than 40 feet in length without the introduction of a minimum 4-foot recess, 4-foot projection or change in orientation. Two story exterior wall forms shall be interrupted by minor roof forms. ' III. MATERIAL AND DETAIL REGULATIONS When choosing materials for buildings in Baxter Meadows, architects should select materials of an appropriate quality and durability in an often harsh northern environment. Synthetic and composite materials which conserve valuable wood resources should be considered whenever a building owner is contemplating opaque finishes or Nigh maintenance areas. The use of ' materials and colors for all structures in the development districts shall blend into the surrounding site. ' The following are the only allowable materials in Baxter Meadows: A. ROOF MATERIALS ' Durable roof materials capable of withstanding the freeze thaw cycle of the environment are required. Cold roof systems with adequate ventilation and insulation are ' recommended. All roof materials shall carry a Class A or B rating. The following are the only acceptable roof materials: ■ Treated wood shakes or shingles ■ Synthetic shakes and shingles ■ Natural and synthetic slate shingles ' Asphalt random tab shingles ■ Pre-finished metal roofing ■ Other similar materials, as allowed by the BMHOA ' All roof flashing vents, hoods, and roof accessories shall be copper or a pre-finished metal that blends with the color of the roofing material selected. ' B. EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS The character of the building exterior shall be kept simple in order to harmonize and ' compliment the surrounding environment of the site. Natural materials and subdued colors shall be used on the main body of the building. Exterior trim can be more colorful and may contrast with the main body in order to add visual interest to the predominant ' neutral tones. Full scale samples of all exterior building materials, including window samples are required in the Final Plan Review. t Baxter Meadows 3-9 The MBHOA shall consider materials not listed below that maintain the aesthetic continuity of Baxter Meadows, including pre-finished composite wood products and ' synthetic siding materials. ' 1. Stonework: Rock shall be natural or synthetic stone materials. Dry stack settings with ' minimal exposed mortar are preferred. Stonework shall not be applied to individual wall surfaces in order to avoid a veneer-like appearance. Detailed drawings of all exterior stonework shall be required as a part of the final plan submittal. ' 2. Concrete/Stucco: t Exposed concrete foundation walls between ground level and exterior wall siding shall be a maximum of 8 inches. Foundation exposure over 8 inches shall be finished with synthetic textured stucco (stained a subdued color in harmony with ' the building), stone, or treated wood. 3. Wood and Wood Product Siding: ' Smooth or rough sawn wood siding and approved composite wood products shall be the only acceptable exterior wood sheathing materials. All wood siding shall ' be painted or stained with an opaque stain. Other wood product siding will be considered by the BMHOA on a case by case basis. ' 4. Shingles: Natural and synthetic shingles shall be used only as accent or detail materials within the composition of exterior finishes. Shingles shall not be the dominant ' exterior material on any building. 5. Natural Log: ' Natural log materials shall be milled or assembled with irregular lengths and diameters. Prefabricated log homes, including prefabricated kit homes of any ' type, shall not be allowed. C. EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND DOORS ' 1. Scale, Composition and Proportion: ' Windows and doors shall be of a consistent size, shape and orientation throughout a given building. Window and door patterns and reveals shall be carefully studied to create interest and variety. ' Large scale windows and doors shall be recessed or trimmed a minimum of 6 inches in exterior wall surfaces. Uninterrupted bands of windows and doors shall not be allowed in any building. Window and door locations shall be carefully ' considered to avoid being obscured by accumulating snow. 2. Solar Orientation and Exposure: ' Baxter Meadows 3-10 The design and location of exterior windows shall respond to the solar orientation ' of the building. The following energy considerations shall be addressed in the building design: ' ■ Double or triple glazing • Neutral density gray solar tinting ■ Openings caulked around windows and doors ' ■ Weather-stripping • Storm windows ■ Entry Vestibules 3. Materials: Windows and doors shall be constructed of natural, stained or painted wood, or ' pre-finished aluminum, enamel or vinyl cladding. All glazing shall be framed in walls of stone, stucco or wood. Glass curtain walls shall not be approved in any circumstance. Mirrored glass shall not be used. ' Glass storm panels, set within the window sash, may be used within divided-light windows, provided that the storm panel is installed on the interior side of the ' window. Divided light glass must be authentic appearing. 4. Garage Doors: ' Garage doors shall not be oriented toward the street, and shall be de- emphasized in the elevation of the building and screened. Garage doors should ' be the same color as the building, and shall not be lighter in color than the building. D. DECKS, BALCONIES, TERRACES AND PORCHES 1. Design: Decks, balconies, terraces and porches shall be designed to enhance the overall architecture of the building by creating variety and detail on exterior elevations. Covered decks, projecting balconies and bay windows shall be integrated with, rather than randomly placed throughout, the building. Terraces shall be used to integrate the building and landscape by creating a transition between the built and natural character of the site. No deck, balcony or porch shall be used for the storage of any items except normal furniture. No exterior carpeting may be used if it is visible from any neighboring lot or the street. All railings shall be wood or approved wood-like material finished to be compatible with the color scheme of ' the house. 2. Materials: Low level decks shall be skirted to grade, while providing proper ventilation and access. Decks which are not practical to skirt shall be designed to assure that the underside of the deck is integrated with the design of the building. Exposed ' anodized aluminum joist hangers shall not be allowed. Posts shall be a minimum of eight inches-.square, .and shall be paired together to diminish a thin visual appearance. The dimensions of two-story columns shall be increased to account Baxter Meadows 3-11 r � � rfor the great height. Materials and colors shall be consistent with the building and surrounding landscape. 1 rE. BUILDING COLOR Exterior color schemes throughout Baxter Meadows shall emphasize the natural tones of the surrounding natural environment and those of a traditional neighborhood r development. Large exterior wall surfaces shall be painted or stained with natural tones. Trim and other accenting details of the building may be of a brighter intensity and contrasting color scheme. Color schemes shall emphasize the contrast between the ' basic wall surfaces and accented details. All exterior color schemes shall be reviewed by, and approved by the BMHOA as a part of the Final Plan Review and Approval. 1 rIN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Design Review Guidelines and Regulations have been executed this day of , 2002. rBAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. r Gerald R. Williams, Director 1 ' STATE OF MONTANA ) ss COUNTY OF GALLATIN ) r This instrument was acknowledged before me on , by Gerald R. Williams, as Director of Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. r ' Notary Public for the State of Montana Print Name: Residing at: r (SEAL) My Commission Expires: Baxter Meadows 3-12 BAXTER- MEADOWS BOZEMAN, MOAITANA F i 1 PART IV 1 0 1 DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS 1 AS TO WETLANDS AREAS i 1 �. AM 1 1 � i 1 I. DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AS TO WETLAND AREAS 1 Baxter Meadows Development, L.P., Montana limited partnership which acquired title as W.B.C., L.P., a Montana limited partnership, of PO Box 11060, Bozeman, Montana, 59771 hereafter the Declarant, does hereby make and declare the following Declaration of Protective 1 Covenants to be placed upon portions of the real property owned by the Declarant more particularly described as Tract 2A, Tract 3A and Tract 4A of Certificate of Survey No. 2202A, located in Section 34, Township 1 South, Range 5 East, and Section 3 of Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana hereafter referred to as the "property". 1 These covenants shall apply to the protected areas on the property being those areas within 35 feet from the edge of the ordinary highwater mark for streams (or edge of wetland vegetation 1 adjacent to the stream) and the edge of wetland vegetation for wetland buffers. (Refer to City of Bozeman Ordinance 18.50 for further details). In the case of stream buffers, the total protected area will be a corridor of 70 feet plus the width of the surface water (adjust outward as 1 determined by slope modifications and edge of wetland vegetation). These protected areas include wetlands, mitigation wetlands, created lakes, and all waterways/streams as shown on Figure 1 attached hereto, as follows: 1) willow/emergent wetland and mitigated portion of that 1 wetland in the NE%SE% Section 34, Township 1 South, Range 5 East (W-8); 2) spring head and channel (W-3), a tributary of the Baxter-Border ditch and mitigated portion of that wetland in the SW%NE%SW% Section 34, Township 1 South, Range 5 East; 3) Baxter-Border and Spring 1 ditches, NE% Section 3 and S'/2 34, Township 1 and 2 South, Range 5 East; and 4) the lakes and connecting stream in the S'/z NE% Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East. These Covenants shall attach to and run with the property and shall constitute an equitable 1 servitude upon the property including all titles, interest and estates as may be held, conveyed, owned, claimed, devised, encumbered, used, occupied and improved, and shall be for the benefit of each owner. They shall constitute benefits and burdens to Declarant and to all ' persons or entities hereafter acquiring any interest in the property. 1. The following restrictions shall apply to any protected areas within the property: 1 A. There shall be no construction or placement of buildings or mobile homes, fences, signs, billboards or other advertising material, or other structures, 1 whether temporary or permanent, in the protected areas, (with the exception of signage and/or benchmarks identifying the boundaries of the wetland areas described in Figure 1). 1 B. There shall be no filling, draining, excavating, dredging, mining, drilling or removal of topsoil, loam, peat, sand gravel, rock, minerals or other materials. 1 C. There shall be no building of roads or paths nor any change in the topography of the protected areas. ' D. There shall be no removal, destruction, or cutting of trees or plants, spraying with biocides, insecticides, pesticides or herbicides (except to control noxious weeds), grazing of animals, farming, tilling of soil, or other agricultural activity within the 1 protected area. E. There shall be no operation of snowmobiles, motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles or 1 any other type of motorized vehicles on the protected areas. ' Baxter Meadows 4-1 1 2. The City of Bozeman has identified specific zones within the setbacks for native plantings (City of Bozeman Ordinance 18.50 D(2)(g)(i) & (ii). Trails constructed with a 1 non-impermeable surface (e.g. pea-gravel), benches, directional and natural science information are allowed within the 35-foot setbacks (plus adjustments) with permission from the Bozeman City Planning Department. 3. These Covenants may be changed, modified or revoked only upon written approval of the District Engineer of the Omaha District of the US Army Corps of Engineers. To be effective, such approval must be witnessed, authenticated, and recorded pursuant to 1 the law of the State of Montana. 4. These Covenants are made in perpetuity such that the present owner and its heirs, 1 successors and assigns forever shall be bound by the terms and conditions set forth herein. 1 5. Determination of invalidity of any portion of these Covenants shall not in any manner affect the other portions or provisions. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Design Review Guidelines and Regulations have been . 9 9 1 executived this day of , 2002. 1 BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT, L.P. 1 1 Gerald R. Williams, Director 1 STATE OF MONTANA ) ss COUNTY OF GALLATIN ) 1 ' This instrument was acknowledged before me on , by Gerald R. Williams, as Director of Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. 1 1 Notary Public for the State of Montana Print Name: ' Residing at: (SEAL) My Commission Expires: 1 Baxter Meadows 4-2 BAXTER., MEADOWS . BO-fi AN MONTANA #��_ }`:�.�� .,.1�•,, �1�, �� fL''�� �Jr. �, �...i�� :1t � .v�,T�f_t ri.' � _ � ��Y� 3�4J4._ � ;d a ♦. 1 1 PART V 1 0 1 APPENDIX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 01 i 1 PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION ' BAXTER MEADOWS DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ' New Construction & Building Alterations: Project Description: 1 ' Property Legal Description/Address: ' Owner's Name: Date: Address: ' Telephone: Fax: E-Mail: If an Agent is submitting on behalf of the Owner, also complete the following: ' Agent's Name: Date: ' Business: Address: ' Telephone: Fax: E-Mail: Plan Review Submittal Requirements: ' ❑ Site Plans indicating easements, setbacks, utility locations, water shed corridors, landscape plan, site drainage, parking areas, driveways, snow storage areas, fence ' details and finished floor elevation. ❑ Floor Plans and exterior building elevations showing square footage, finished grade, exterior materials, windows, doors, building address location and size, exterior lighting tfixture cutsheets, roof pitches and building height. ❑ Colored elevation or perspective of proposed house. ❑ Material and finish schedule with samples of all exterior finishes. 1 t 1 � • Once Final Plan Approval is granted, no change from the approved plans shall be made without the review and written approval of the Design Review Board. 1 It is hereby understood and agreed that Architectural Committee approval of this application does not constitute approval as to compliance with applicable State law or County regulations. 1 The Owner or the Owner's Agent is responsible for obtaining any and all permits required by all governmental entities and complying with such building and construction codes as such governmental entities may adopt. SIGNATURE OF OWNER (S) DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE 1 APPLICATION APPROVED BY BMHOA DATE 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 t CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE ' BAXTER MEADOWS DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ' The Design Review Board of the Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association hereby acknowledges compliance with the Baxter Meadows Design Review Guidelines and ' Regulations for the following property: ' Property Legal Description/Address: ' Owner's Name: Date: Address: ' Telephone: Fax: E-Mail: If a Compliance Bond was required, it shall be released to the Owner immediate) P q � .Y It is hereby understood and agreed that receipt of this Certificate of Compliance does not constitute approval as to compliance with applicable State law, County or City regulations. The Owner or Owner's agent is responsible for obtaining any and all permits required by all ' governmental agencies pertaining to building occupancy. SIGNATURE OF OWNER (S) DATE for the DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE 1 COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AND BOND t This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , by and ' between , herein referred to as Property Owner, and the Design Review Board of the Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association, Inc. ' 1. Property Owner intends to build a building, together with landscaping located at (legal description), Bozeman, Montana, in accordance with the drawings and specifications prepared by t (licensed architect), and which building, landscaping, plan and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board on (date). ' 2. Based upon the review of the foregoing, the parties mutually agree that as security for the performance of the building and landscaping referred to herein, the sum of $ in the form of (check, certificate of ' deposit, or letter of credit) shall be deposited on behalf of the Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association at (name of financial institution). ' 3. The parties agree that the building and landscaping referred to herein shall be completed no later than (date). In the event that this ' project is not substantially completed in such time, in accordance with the approved plans, subdivision covenants and the BMHOA's Design Regulations, and absent any written extensions of time granted by the Design Review Board, the parties agree that ' the deposit mentioned in Number 2 above shall be forfeited to the Bozeman Homeowner's Association. If work on the project has ceased or if the project has been abandoned in the early stages of construction, the Design Review Board may elect to ' demolish the improvements and/or restore the site so as not to be unsightly to surrounding properties. It is further understood that the deposit mentioned above may be withdrawn on the sole signature of the appropriate officer or representative of the ' Design Review Board, but may not be withdrawn on the sole signature of the Property Owner. 4. The condition of this obligation is such that if the Property Owner shall promptly and ' faithfully perform the building and landscaping in accordance with the approved final plans, the subdivision covenants, and the Design Regulations, then this obligation shall be deemed satisfied. 5. No right of action shall accrue under this Compliance Agreement or on this Bond to or for the use of any person or a corporation other than the Baxter Meadows Homeowner's ' Association, its successors or assigns. In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Compliance Agreement the day and ' year first above written. for the Design Review Board Owner Date Date err , �r► 1► � ���� ti ����� �- • • r 1 0 a a a LEGEND EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS �•. r PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS . ; PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS • �— DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW i Q f STORM WATER DETENTION POND j S.T RM : W A T DE EN: ION ONQ'' E. . I .a� �............� PHASE ONE LI ITS z M �" Z "` r WATER COURSE LIMITS Z o PROPERTY BOUNDARY o LLJ '•.; w o a x _ a Z r Y Nm IN ^O r a w In co N o 3 z Lu 2 w MR T I i C _. W f W (, ! _� w 0 BAXTER LANE a ❑: z az Lu V In W w o C O:M:M N,I•TY N r R.�`... J W '\ BED c B R E . F A•. T W o 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) W K1 OF 4 W F 4 0 a d 4 J I DEAD MAN"S GULCH �--- LEGEND m EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS o ;. ;. -- •- EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS a- ._ - 'ARK. •- .. WETLAND .".' •• .- '• PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS � EN SPA E '•:: ... PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS v.z - .-,,•„, ., ,,,... .•'� •', -- DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW r ,..�-•. ,....., !' yr :.. •; .•;;:t::; .. ;• .. .,.•:,- ..•. ., .,. ,....�' `k;•. .•',.:.;: .,.•..-.�• ,.. ....._-.-- STORM WATER DETENTION POND HAZEL- PHASE ONE LIMITS z o f(ENT -•fAN ION CENTER a WATER COURSE LIMITS F o I ii! ' Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY 'o o w cY� I a o_ -VETERINARY f Z Y - w '.`;:'.•ti:•. : � �.GRA55� "nIEJ Z p 4 V7 " .EBUESTRIATI •� -.� •�.•. ..- � . + -....• :��•' '.•t �.'.'.. C y -.._ .D AI ACE FLOW. 1.- ,i- .. '.. -DE EN.IONT N6-f Y a. ... ....._ d t.,�:, � `.';' . :,• '-:.•• `z; VILLAGE.... , r ........ .......! ; � PORK .- ._.. - r • , _..---.-.... ... Q .:. �— BAXTER LANE BA XTRLNEpp Mlv I , BER ..... ....... @RE. FA. T•, LCu Lu 'L{ uj .... o m fn o . • o •., i- cn w of o ;S .. -- .. p. 4 .... ............. i_ Lr) EL LL 6C10L:e.` z RK Q (7 .................... yj .. Lu ............... rn w 300 0 300 600 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) .. .- —@�`ni,�,-:.�,•.�.:.,��;;�r- -:i-�::�--_:��>�-c°'�° OAK STREET s OF I' j j O ........... LEGEND ... EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS z EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW 1-3 STORM WATER DETENTION POND PHASE ONE LIMITS z -.dd u 0 z - WATER COURSE LIMITS Z o Lu w - PROPERTY BOUNDARY VETERINARY ....... ..... WALE .............. �e 0 V) LL 0 4A clj z Lu _j .... ........ ..... .. cow 0 m 0 u .......... RNS.SY SWALE EQUESTRIAN ................ C E NTE-R.- ................. ca Lu ........... uj Lu • wa cr EL Fa ui CD w z Ld x Ld ui C) CD co V) 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) - E R L AN E BAXT K2 OF // ! Architects+Designers+Planners - �.+' i I _!I'••'P�Yam,.��_ i ! ! � -� / i/ APPALOOSA COURT BAXTER MEADOWS STREET TREES STREET TREES � \• I ! ��_/ � i - BETULA PAPYRIFERA PAPER BIRCH 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. Bozeman Montana Pier56 i2oi Alaskan Way ARABIAN COURT c_TREET TREE Suite 200 OTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENTS pHELLO Seattle WAg8to ,�„ ,......�„�„�„_ DENDRON AMURENSE CORKTREE 2' CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. /—,.�..—,.�.,—.�. —, 33344t. JOR• T. ? A ATIN GREEN STREET TRFF - PA%206 623.7005 76 ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM 3' CAL BRANCHED AT 6' HT. l BELGIUM COURT STREET TREE `. '�••/ / Ii { r \ ACER PLATANOIDES 'DEBORAH' DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. EQUESTRIAN LANE STREET TREES j \ I 158 FRAXINUS PENNSLYVANICA 'PATMORE' PATMORE GREEN ASH 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT B' HT. cLYSOALE COURT STR ET TR C \ � \_ I TILIA CORDATA LITTLELEAF LINDEN 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. \`•� �h 1 II I / \ ; R07FI STREET TREES _ PREPARED FOR: 52 GLEDITISIA TRIACANTHOS 'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. Williams Brothers FJORD COURT STREET TREES Construction I � ! QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2'CAL + -BRANCHED AT B' HT. LATIGO STREET TREES 32 ACER PLATANOIDES 'CRIMSON KING' CRIMSON KING NORWAY MAPLE 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. 1035 Cerise Road BAXTER PARKWAY STREET TREE Billings, Montana 5910 SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2" CAL + SINGLE STEM FERGUSON STREET TREES. POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2" CAL + ! 31 ACER PLATANOIDES 'EMERALD QUEEN' NORWAY MAPLE 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 " CAL. i ! OR -PINUS SP. PINE 6 8' HT. ACER PLATANOIDES 'DEBORAH'- DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT B' HT. PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 — 8' HT. PROJECT: BAXTER MEADOWS _4 EQUESTRIAN BAXT R and STREET TRFF SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2"CAL + SINGLE STEM LOCATION: C OPEN SPACE T I � '_•—•-�•�-�•— �. MEADOW - POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN - - 2"CAL + - - Bozeman, Montana _. .. ... L._.—•1 ,---,— .« • ^. PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 — 8' HT. i....:..._ --� 11 �.�• .-,. \-\ � PINUS SP. ..... .... . PINE -B — 8' HT. ' RIATA ROAD STR ET TREEC t \ SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2"CAL + SINGLE STEM POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2"CAL + ^`•\ I RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 " CAL.' j { I PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 — 8' HT. PINUS SP. PINE B— 8' HT. � / lllli i i � � I .�•� NGN�E�AR xErxAP _ PHABEI NENiNS..H00n GREEN I.INRB.TYP. � I i f �4EE E%NIBR"C' I I ._.._..,.. LocAmN, _ �`\ •\\. EQUESTRIAN ' \- I - I • I ' I • i. • 46,000 6FOPEN SPACE i I •I ; Ill MIE EEMEGI / '• 36A668F ACTIVE •• ' • I. - I I OPEN SPACE i ' IuxEAfl PARNB EXHEIR _ \ MEADOW \ - 'u^Fofl GETAN- T \. I• EIA008P OPEN I- 1 \ L._._._._._._._.1 Lj_L L .:aouEF Ac ve JJ1` I ' i i I OPENSP EGUNWACe , y •it I - \ • \ I +I NEAODW I 1' ` \ •\ i ( - 1 •• i .i i. — i / `\ . • I FoRpfl ASEE!%MN)R PANIXEA IN GIAGCE BK —_— —_—_—_ I _—_—— PACECI NANA6EA —j— eezcESTREc� — — — — ——— i LF,BS r�s—RAIL I I I! — Bs $+ PN6Ect ANGNTen FENCE,T I lJ- I I I R10.ECf lFA4 NENBFA - I•al I ,\\ �• /-� i \ � i � i I B ,LFIBK,JW SS INITIALS F�EENkm. I . _ - - - - i :! 0 ,► - tID _ -- - - . •. T ' Exhibit "L1'° BAXTER LANE(Minor ArbriEl) I - - _.._.._:_ _.._ ._:._..—.._.._.._.._.._.._------ -. --_----_.- - - - ._._ _---------------._' . ----._ _.._.._:. . _.._.._ _._ _.._.._.:_.._:___.._.._.._.._.._._.._.._.._ .. _ _:_._ _ .._. _._.._._ _ __�_ _ _ _ _ __ - _____.__._.__ Landscape Plan -P SCa i i I(1�_ OPEN SPACE I ! I E C E 0 D. NFA�GW � D -\• i ii i ! DEC 12 2002' OEPARTMEw OF PLANNING ANo COMDUN!'°DEVELOP,,!IT i J i i i i ' � j i j PnGEI:r xG ........................—..—........—.—._.,_ 01 236.00 DAE ! II u V 10/29/01 . FalacT xnwux FAnr SCALE: 1'=100'-O' . 9,Hr xUMNFA SET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - -. ------- - - COPYRIGHT 02001 MRHUN,INC. 4 Exhibit"C" Street Sections I Phase One Site Plan' f �I t i Exhibit"Y' - Plat Map' See: Sub division �)Pelivnlmry I �Ivt Q pp I;ca+�o n I I r� 4 _ f a . !, ExhibitJ i , ` Architectlure n 41 �- -_- -- i/�_ � :r... /��I\\may =t�Fb' =E !!'..al \>\•a n:;��•�.l lil l t —Ca - �.« an, vim io 11 p', 11,1 �� ��Ik►ri� Sri e�haimrt[I ;�rir�1� _ �� -, I�iull�ins (� iuiiii,i i �- s ��. ' • • rK .�,WII1111IAI�_� 1_ ��:; ,� _— _,�*�: t• T� :.� .\., .:,�.t��s� ,ry i � ,Asa``�':�, •,: :oAlYlYIAIYIYh � � :. _ ='1�_♦1 ■1■i�r ..'1 -I�O.I��— \ �i -..9 .rrr- .J'.i ! Bi�,.,,';= 1✓'. II14I�I�IIIII I I,`_a��i�I, °I11'�_ _ I �1•� -- 11� mill.. ..IS ,q,;_:I �_�•_ _ _ _.a.�i_ ., i�n. "emu, 311 II � Aa-2-4-1 pw 1=1 _:.� �.!��� ,., �,= �;■Iw���rtt� I_t_�I� I':� �� '� IINKI�I ! '� �IIILIII IOi�J,� Irl _ III%-, n 1�� 1� ii�ltln1 1Ailo11,0MilifI - ILL, 11111 = b . --- �N.— ' `� �au.��>_= _� �' 1`�; ;,SS � �CS�.E: ±A _ --•�.,�, �'�����. �i['� I�I '. .:`'�L�a "fJ r•._—_ .- ';{i�l�l_'.J��� 1.. �� Wi n.• ��I�'Jli`C�{•� - _ AXTER I -y - MEADOWS --- -� _ IF; HOME k FARMHOUSE II r r. i I I ELEVATION Rd Fm&. -- - - i CRAFTSMAN i- - ELEVATION PRAIRIE 1' y , ELEVATION MITHUN ARCHITECTS.DESIGNERS.PLANNERS 10 / 19 / 01 I • XTER MEADOWS 1 CONDOMINIUM re. I MITHON ARCHRECfS•DESIGNERS•PLANNERS 10 / 19 / 01 •III- ti., I,. i'111 `� \I• :\� ., \; 1 ��� � � �i gi fll t � �\' ��\. % � ;` Ilioili1 � � �; , ��\\���.\.�. �\' � ��' lot IN ■i®�■i� �� , ■ ur��rtruu IJ•.a.urnoa.' I rl■I■,•'•,' „ ilrLlrerJl�1, [\t\�♦ �. `..=/ ti IIUlUR111 r >.wrlrlmm e ilnm■Ixnu r _ U�;nllnrl�l� -- - - Ir!nrtlmm�n I -— — ----� lirf Iitir unit 1.� u�■s� � �� � '�\�'�\`�\�: ::1`:h.:�\\; rl/rr1�11/ir /tf•"' �:•,��1�\\\' \�.\\\` \\.i�.• .. I �11111rr■711i1 :\�\\\\\".�1•� 'I111�1 ����`I bum" ■/1If11ro �li(ntrtu>.1r1 I I �iltrlt\\o> ii.�\.�\\\� Fitly ;:•.ill I IIIII11iQ'W[ • �� :::Ir1 •\�\ { !1r■• 1i�3 pl ;III I i1111itrltuut■ \ r �/ �1�• 11� ■1111/ s IIRVaN l tt� �\� -- _ _ -- �:; �� i11111 / `:111 I�IuulliClli •\ ,�\ �� — OI■111e(l1►Tel Ir r�• \\\• �,� ? I � Inli'i■.1(.(UI :\�•\\s •:..,,' ■■ N�9� ti � \,j \� I.J ,irk• �' i.lo•�rs -n ,\\\• ! �1 IIr1 �*:.11<!h�! s�s�fl',.y ��~..- 11tl1��,� .. _ IE!,•:___�_.,�-_\\lA�,..!:'it. �!�t!s`! I. - F .f•.r• � � „w�r1�ID�It. rr. '�'• �:�:� �\l ® .• /. .1. .� a• (�'{ '1 �'• LryI YIiY'i;.C,�`�. "P U�r. i.'+?4 r nr:'=�i1i11�CFI!sws+»e111■1■IWIILI�i( ��f':'"'1._.ri.��7..r11111G.,�.'.�:1_L'+:_, ��:���sJlr•\��Ji���.tS'r�glili _ rs_, ..,alT�► crnriCJ�ll.�i[S.. _� � �.�.:!�iTI�D.Siiy:7�� '�'��' y Nis j W`. ;� � \Q�II��\. _ — --�.\\\�\_ >�Ni : r r,i�1��1!r ilif�r'►�.\i 't ,;C', w�— jr \ I` - .v�s�. - :.�u awn s \•' _ - lltIllll ��� lil(I�i 1lil sl'�i��11 ( \,�,,�����li� a �'!\;���,�\I�'�\�;�'loll/\i' t fl■■�i��� I ! ` �� ���� �''.\; y; - \ III � �III�I� 1111■I■ ��. .�►MI� o� •III■�ul -•---- n..� �,\\ �� �+�n I�Luln i mullem111'■ nit!l�iuii�'lli \\� K�' ''-�' I�� ■r IIU ( — _ rlelr, nluul a\\\arr�1�:�•: 11 '► enuuurYrlu. ■.11� uwlui _ ---- Irnlrlern uennliuuls Ilil w�j ��� \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\: Itr11111 fll` r�.\\\\\\\ \\ . \\ -- \ v\, .. �• ., w , \\\��•\• [■I:III'L IIIIIII a\\\71■t AMC. r• \\ \\ N1/lNlU 11l� 1111r1■uo1nU( �\\r\s ������ e�c•'r;s� . IIY ., ,.■••' \, �„ , \ \\\"11 \ 1\\,��\\• IIIIYrI11Yln1 Il�l�lUlltl'f111 \\\\7 �J�• �� �i�-■ems �\•a.�n...�. 'liilr�e ■,l r.��'1�: J:;..��'..,. �il�..11'.�yJ,.:L..l SWJ `eee�; �nrmml•ll�l I �.\\�� ��1111 �* �/ � � �'.a� `�\•�� IIIru11 _ _I Ill �;`�aw �� ��] Ui IYI111ii/IIe11i1 _ I �nr11lIILIIU �\\\� If1���i � I' ��, , I, , `'~ � ■�� t`I\7 ■�� IIelrliitllF —— njfp111111,u'I \•�.\iltr - --(— �� � t, r � / �..■� \\ate rnlum Inl ;•\\ m � --r•�� �■� ,Mimi ���ItVlrtl7lll■et-�. �,IIIIYIII , R' r _ _ •.. _ _ INITIM1t1'■�•e. ,■`its ..r,7.5!71�r■1 ,i�! r r r . ♦' r (11 -I r ] r>_ a .. 1 �. �' ���■� �� ii 't '!I.I;I:'I I I►�t�11 ' i IR+if�llli'1^ di1�1[I1111 \\\\T �� 1 AEI 1', ���'�1� S t.t?If.��11�111�� :\. ' 1�IilYhlY;ilkw7ii '•L7Rt'r�lr■t';rt►�1S:J 7AA \\\\��.cli.� i{ - r�,Jf/1.Y3 f.M���•�7�/L�_'•w�-t'Y�1�1iw1!I•IIIIIt1111i11��1��_ r -.��w•.aw•a�w—..� •��s`�•a��r�:\ I �t'�Irrl�.ulJlllrellliil.-lF1'if ji�iYli::�i�.�1N1i�F�i'Y.'ri)il \\\\`•>i_ __i �i 7S�1T(i r1'ii�I.�iI • w w i aMIS FIN �'�ZY%rLre��.'r•�,SfiP.�.i9 \\ Y�l �, 1 1 i AXTER r MEADOWS LIVE WORD r I r - _ .. .. f'' •Y"C� >y,.o ,1 �r�,.! _ 'ems••y '♦ � � �,�"y r .• y' 4 r I MITHUN ARCHITECTS DESIGNERS♦PLANNERS 10 / 19 / 01 I • • • BAXTER MEADOWS BED AND BREAKFAST 1 WITH CARETAKER'S 1 UNIT \ ��// 1 l�� � t � ' I I ; � I I I I i 1 I I I G �1 ` I A 1 I F ; I � ♦ +.r •� 11 I { �_I i_{ �! i 1 M T � 1 7 + I �_ , .I � •�� _ - _ j - 111 i n i " f 4 ps ` MITHUN ARCHITECTS.DESIGNERS.PLANNERS 4 10 / 19 / 01 ce �••r _ r glow � � 1 Nw;x r- iilive •. � __ I Irinf39Mi r sa . ZK 1 i AXTER MEADOWS EQUESTRIAN. CENTER N Yam"' _ r i 49 R HIGH 1 �t-rr �-sti TECH C � eeNeswcno►i 10 / 19 / 01 a � r J'.' i a4 i..0 t \ ,�IrN 1!�C.�,7 �/,�4 t''����PPP�' .'•r n � r {-n.:•s Fr SS ^f�• ,.4.(, .'�' rtit" r°',(� ' r rat :.� ,( ''�i��•'�' tt'�.f:��>� % 3Y<"✓ t Ilk AR r. t ''Nh e�J.t1t v ?�',6'f�a�'+-`i �.' •ram rb n�,�; a� � �... , �! ..st. 1.�.•,,ay �. µ 1i .��i,;4, r 3S F,� � i� EI •, � , 5I �t t 'T�4 ' to: Si'77�r ' •",t,!�•':•j.;.: i \- :ils b. 4,c •_; r a`��['� '�.t � r ,��'�i its I 1� .11r � , L_L I ,�II � -•��.s.. ( .. Pi l )I � M t �f N .... :#':H_ � is`-,•fy' l �rTt r ,;,. ! � �v >UA��! � `•y.�:�l�,,7�,t'•f'�^`w' ,,�.•t� - t } 'i ! 'E"recr ,j;� f r V'1 i{�i�a %}�i � . 8..;�;. :�<'C:•° j ) ,s l> r�yt .:,tIdd�'."'.�r �1.. ' rzi;L"'l dr \�I.,.!" 11 ''•:. • f/t ; t { •�. � aR'$'��tr,'e(1 N'S J,3 Nr Sts s'. 4A Cr .M„�t'dl Je ta�'� ►. 'sar '�.i'}.'•F n,T` �' ,' rr � r :�'v' l I P•, rs{�) ,fir} 3�t1 ! f ) r}fttY�r;�i• Sys ',..�t'�'?, tikes it 'ly SF h ! 1 - L. tii ''.3 t +: !.3" , .W2'a. i :•"; ..• �: t � i •. ,a •� •s rr,, ti ��.. 1',,. t .t.t�Est.�, ..•t: �rP ✓ r S ! 14 ( :P��''. {.:.?i!Y rl• %. 1* f �t' f I t 3 , .�tb .ri:.yi'r�.k�t?t"??'R.Y.R,.., 'n�h�' tt'�� pq,�� E ri.E,i;'.y:t.�t. tir; �!(I!M V� i;� a trr •;', ;; �)t ,:��='` .3"Aa:;�• •t;"� r � yy, �''': 1 .y1�i.;. 3: � t •:ai�? y .:F {.!(��"r 4 �d �}, Ile ri t I � � 1s t •�'T -. N^i l.r.'r\ p ,fjr.� t :;).• • y a 'dj r� [,a rr �i�,? ":?A�•:i, �:��a'; S.''' rs t�• t..''? •.,�� � ,� �- y�� r. ,fir r V j'` ,"t.�r:, :- +'�. l� _'•' ��.n �� � � �• .�ttt�, ..I � _` Li s I r}„hVt I..i�:: .7.:i�•�� 'r`: _t!r1yr•• } ,� �V is\: i't;l �"7- t � Fb Sl f it ,,.s„s �s� r�fir ".:•� r••��C :N;C '� `�� ) �3: '�+ }. f.ry c r '.'.•' r;.�` nit i:` �t1 3��' , i':s:..•, �,;;.,�. ., � :.'3�!1': ' t �J C P �1�It.r.—M`•f,•as; ;'t�ti•�q' t �'t.a r_Tt x�`l+'9. `s • t MITHUN Arddte t+Cm gners+Pluiners Pl.S6 I=Muhl Wry M. Sewk,WA 961. J Tn ao6 6a7•33M Q rat to6 154170bS C tron Z _ �, PREPARED F01L ZONING AS ' Simm not Trail Court kWllllams'Brothers SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL o a Construction 0 0 AS AS RESIDENTIAL M-I 1035 Cerise Road RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL Dead s Gulch Ct. t Billings,Montana 59101 B-2 NI/2, NVI/4, S 1/4 PU@l! Z NING-RBAN AS Orville Woy �. q w� C OP£p SPgCf RESIDENTIAL M-1 PROJECT: AS i o BAXTER MEADOWS � BP M-1 _ 3 o - LOCATION: ZONING: AS Q ti ~` Roy ' I`- E Bozeman,Montana RURAL RESIDENTIAL Q �2 RS rn RE� E " s SVl/4, SEC. 34 0 &7 0 SEI/4, SEC. 4 Lyec AWMIL c E COS NO.2202 2�2 QA' Q COS NO.2202 AS Q n a ti� L�zi RESIDENTIAL M-1 M-1 Z�T�W ZONING AS RS m URBAN Boothill Ct. = yJm N�L RESIDENTIAL Z BP PLI Baxter Lanes R-1 CITY LIMITS M-1 CITY LIMITS INSTITUTION �W ZONING: ASr M-1 URBAN f-^ AS RESIDENTIAL R_3 AS RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL a M-1NE1/4, SEC. 3 CITY LIMITS B-2 COS N0.2202 dx R-3 FUTURE OAK STREET Oak St. Ma lewood St - rr Q R-2-A in R-3 0 Z 0 R-3 s Stevens .�K,....a, I 1 ■ m S St. B� Or ■o t as Wind _ oBmS,LF,BK,JW ......... S( `o INITIALS R-4 Terrace Ave. D N N B-1 o Z. a rw N Durston Rd. ® harlotte _ z Be r a»: iFR �= 1 Exhibit -4 Gro e d R-3 R -p R- A Vicinity Map ToolejStDDnH R-3 Vi lar n` c°inn '—�c zzzz � zz a z � � U N uu VICINITY AND EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE NOT TO SCALE 01236.00 10/16/01 CTA COPYRIGHT 2001 oRAvr sr• --___su_srtl.____aErlslo�-To -------°r'irm------- CCpTAp0 ATIDWORFCS LAN&OIRPKS vmm euEal_7c________ GRou P IvsY`s.•a�754D� LANOSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CTA- VA&KY------SKV ----t---- Or L. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRNJM O Z001 NTMUN,INC. i W-10 0 DEADMANS GULCH ROAD a ND AREA WETLAND IDENTIFICATION AREA/ACRES W-1 xM 6.6359 t\ 1 W-2 c 0.7480_ . \\ W-3 2.3244 \ {� rV'`.il `tt '.r l I t ~� —/ �� �.._ ./ r - �-f� ', \\ \ �1; W-5 _ ,.1 2.6055 N i'i� t ;1 I,\.\ I � '.:\ �\ �. _��' J f" --""ti.._—__-,•! 1! -� ✓9='r'•_._�\• V..., /I/ �� — ��p3,�`.t %` i ,V�u�..� —'W—�.—�^--.•�.\,, 6 1,9376- WV�Ml - \ / A �� / W 7 0 0.4125 > t D\t,` W 10 1.2342 a 4 1 ` } { C. W-11 -0..742.4 Y. - i . (Julj 4 1 -` '• \\may k. _ _ rl 1 - - r r �o Ld i. .^✓•,. // ." "� ._\ '. 1,1.t ='Tt .'^. --- _ _' - - :1�' I % FIR-ONE - /....._._ Y_•.. ILI ? _ a W • t `f •,\\W=,mopLu Ld w a •,�.. -_ t � } 1. 'J/!�\�\ / "'_ ��l 1�\ � i LLI f ; 300 0 300 600 OAK STREET (SCALE IN FEET) W-5 SHEET OF 4 C: tr !L tL Q LEGEND n- I I I I MANHOLE 0 SANITARY SEWER ----- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE s O PHASE ONE LIMITS WATER COURSE LIMITS PROPERTY BOUNDARY Q _ CL G Z CZ9 oo a W � W L LJ ¢ •- .. a. z Z 0 _ v) In L ;z--y Z O.. O L < o _. .. _ 1' 3 W w a] N ltl I 6f> U' — POCKET PARK — , a - o I y O G a _ W W w J . ~ m H W BAXTER LANE 0 W O co) � O � m �- oc �( CD COMMUNITY : CENTER / _j Im 1� u' ED & BREAKFAST y - � B w N 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) W OF 0 a J DEAD MAN'S GULCH m LEGEND LINEAR MANHOLE o PARK WETLAND SANITARY SEWER i OPEN SPACE _____ SANITARY SEWER SERVICE i Q LIFT STATION FORCE MAIN N r O PHASE ONE LIMITS li HOTEL WATER COURSE LIMITS o CONVENTION CENTER z Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY z z _� w. 0 cy w Y wo a IL ir YET01WRYui O N a a = I 4 3 Z W Z N W N J o M Y H U L) EQUESTRIAN 6 o C7 0 O c�i I!I CENTER a m i VILLAGE GREEN POCKET PARK 1 BAXTER LANE BAXTER LANE j o O COMMUNITY CENTER/ a BED & BREAKFAST CWLu ' G x BORHOOD o m o ARK ui 0 i/ o PROPOSED 1 REGIONAL W i PARK W I-- cl) m � e w X a J W z a w y W 300 0 300 600 iiiiiiia SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) OAK STREET OF g LJ G 4. / � d 6 LEGEND �- MANHOLE z 0 SANITARY SEWER ----- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS WATER COURSE LIMITSI v PROPERTY BOUNDARY i z Z o VETERINARY J N a Z Y O 0 to m W O.m Z G O r O N CIJ Q J z c., N ¢ ~W q C�.G Oicsi EQUESTRIAN CENTER N G Q [ W cc Lu J H ~ W 4 U I W a W W 4 � y Xa w Lu J z H w Y� W W N 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) B A X T E R LANE J2 OF AV Exhibit "F" - Wetlands I l 1 Exhibit «J» Sewer • i 1 Exhibit "K" Storm Sewer/Grading Plan OF Exhibit Landscape Plan , I ITHU _ Architects+Designers+Planners i — — } Pier t Alaskan Sul laskan Way Suit e zoo + -I - Seattle,WA 98tot - _ - TEL 2o6 623.3YA FAX 2o6 Si oip�,��•i f +I I � �, PREPARED FOR: I Williams Brothers ! 1 Construction + )I I 1035 Cerise Road + Billings, Montana 59101 y I n BAXTER MEADOWS LINEAR PARK + Bozeman Montana , -F + _ _ _ - CITY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENTS PROJECT: TREE S BAXTER MEADOWS^' SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2"CAL + SINGLE STEM ACCEN RE 4. POPULUS TREMULOIDES - QUAKING ASPEN 2"CAL + LOCATION: - - �(FLO�AEERIN I SPRUCE 6 — 8' HT.PICEA SPP. - - - + ,,CRAB)' Bozeman, Montana / PINUS SPP. PINE 6 — 8' HT. -+ SHRUBS AND GRASSES CORNUS STOLONIFERA REDTWIG DOGWOOD 21" - - I - - CORNUS STOLONIFERA'FLAVIRAMEA YELLOWTWIG DOGWOOD --21" ' MISCANTHUS SP NCN _ 2 GAL / PENNESETUM SP NCN 2 GAL _ •r .� SALIX PURPUREA ARTIC WILLOW 15" '. 10 ACTIVE-MEADOW�j C ILDREN PLAY AR _ I I S + Xn aeP f + ; I , f ,ABPE ,O (1+ t + i BOULDERS,TYPR.. .I - . FOIOT BRIDGE )` PBOFLI MN111(i]I + LF,BS moccr,xw,aT +; + -, I .i CREEK- BS I- 6'SETBACK FROM T�cw Xnan 1 CREEK Y BS,LF,BK,JW it - WECX EXIT#TING VEGETATION 1 TO PEMAIN INITIALS ui Exhibit "L3" GX I I 1 Linear Park m } 1 OPEN SPACE v �.. Detail MEADOW - HYDROSEED POCKETS - I WITH NATIVE GRASSES& t - r..}` + I +.. WILDFLOWERS I ' + + I I ` Pwoa,Xa .i + �. 01236.00 W1E _ _ + --- a — DEC 12 2002 .. __ -- SCALE: 1'=30'-0' - - - - - DEPARTMENT OF PIANNING SET - - - AND CGMh1UNltt DEVEIGPMENT .. - .. . - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ' - COPYRIGHT 0 2001 M THUN,INC. _ - ' ITV Architects+Designers+Planners Neighborhood Parks Bozeman Montana - Pier 56 . - 1201 Alaskan Way QTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENTS Suite Zoo .. DFrInUOUS �a Seattle,WA 981 m TEL 206 623.3344 ACER GINNALA AMUR MAPLE 8' HT FM 2o6 623.7005 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2" CAL - MALUS SP. FLOWERING CRABAPPLE 2" CAL - - PRUNUS VIRGIANIANA 'CANADA RED'. CANADIAN RED 2" CAL - EVERGREEN TREES PINUS PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE 8' HT - - PREPARED FOR: PINUS SYLVESTIS SCOTCH PINE 8' HT _ — Williams Brothers .. — ., '•.� ... ':, - Construction SHRUBS BERBERIS KOREANA KOREAN BARBERRY 18" - - 1035 Cerise Road BERBERIS THUNBERGII JAPANESE BARBERRY 18" CARAGANA SP. NCN 21" - ,': '.' �'SID�wAGI ,) - Billings, Montana 59101 ELEAGNUS NCN 21". ... •... .. ...�..,.,.,.,:� .., ., ..:. .• ,.:.. _- JUNIPERILS SP. JUNIPER 1 GAL' - -, •a* KOLKWITZIA AMABILIS BEAUTYBUSH 18" p LONICERA SPP. HONEYSUCKLE 18" - * PHILADELPHUS SPP. MOCKORANGE 18 - BOULDERS � CO ROSA RUGOSA RAMANAS ROSE 15" PROJECT: ROSA WICHURAIANA MEMORIAL ROSE 15" 1'aPLfTRAILFENCE \ A. �. MEADOWS RHUS TRILOBATA FRAGRANT SUMAC 18 . " BAXTE SPIRAEA SPP BRIDALWREATH 15" \ I LOCATION: R SYRINGA VULGARIS COMMON LILAC 18" r _ LAWN;TYP PEN GROVE XI VIBURNUM OPOLUS HIGHBUSH CRANBERRY 18 X - _ Bozeman, Montana YUCCA FILAMENTOSA ADAM'S NEEDLE 5 GAL A'BERMT,^ / n {#iDO 7 5. \ GROUNDCOVERS AJUGA REPTANS CARPET BUGLE 1 GAL PLANT 36" OC LAMIUM SPP - DEAD NETTLE 1 GAL `PLANT 36"OC VINCA MAJOR - .LARGE PERIWINKLE 1 GAL PLANT 36 OC .e "• •.' ,•'';. VINCA MINOR - - PERIWINKLE 1 GAL PLANT 36"OC 1 .1 . r " % PERENNIALS X • :. '-*. n X X .. ACHILLEA YARROW 1 GAL -*. .•.' '� ,•. •.. ' ' ....'. '. ,.. t COREOPOSIS TICKSEED 1 GAL ECHINACEA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 GAL - \ GERANIUM SP GERANIUM 1 GAL - - " KEY uxr IRIS SP IRIS 1 GAL - ✓ —-- °O r LAVENDULA SP LAVENDER. 1 GAL - - LIATRIS SPICATA SPIKE GAY—FEATHER 1 GAL ki - RUDBECKIA SP CONEFLOWER 1 GAL VERONICA OFFICINALIS SPEEDWELL 1 GAL - - X . X X X xn DA- xcu2a ND X X X X 1401 ACCENTTREE W MAX.PRIVACY FENCE W! - (FLOWERING CRAB) GATE,TYP. (CEDAR OR WOOD) !' X _ X -. - x .—- X _ X - %- vAamrY x Exuws X BK - - I va°ccr uAxAun LF,BS P r mm— X BELT 1GY YEY x X BS,LF,BK,JW x INITIALS x a X X X Ax Exhibit IT Pocket Park SOULDERS^. - ' Det ail ....SPLIY RA1CfENCE o BERM.TYP O p EC EOVE D D ASPEN GROVE• 9ENCH I ......... nnc DEC 12 2002 ° LAIIVN TYP % DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING A. �> AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT °� _ X mum xa •% ✓ X 01236.00 wa + + + + t + 10/19/01 - t + + t + + t 4.4 0 1 + mux xnx ru BOZEL STREET SCALE: 1'=20'-0' SETNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT 02001 MITHUN,INC. 1� 1 1� L Exhibit`.`L-2"`' Landscape Plan' I � , .A Exhibit"L-3" Landscape Plan _ r �Y�t<<T���0r��"" � i#3c�rr" ray �1 �:r + _. �� �`•`.. �:+_ir r 1 . Styr J ")�„y M/ i i:1 /-��,�,ss2�2!!��rs?C2.. Nr '? r� �±��'� r.�_,'�.'`- r`.i1`rV 1 jy'•�r i.+ .1° 5 c ♦�� .a:¢ r� x^' .r:-FFs t'� r"I'.<yL. y i -ir t •L,�.Ji ! !, 6M�F 14✓ i}t '� � .y 5�. +tiR'•n I-r � i( t, 3 ^'Go-+.� pra '\'I t S,ra /� you A 7 � Jr J, tt� �5%• i - �'K jo .f' `�1�-p, arrl`^t 9 '+.�i F feN ty 14 1 ra r f}�'Ll v T� •6i'r` Y �, r ,F': •',` 55+: �. v r?' l,L:•• _ +�``eyft4 C si, rt '1 f 1- " 9:. � l llyti^c~ F,rl-ti!„ :33v`"`' •� . ,jpFk '^hat•^' 'y, .r :� � ry'�` _ � Af ��i';Sr y d y:, ^ � .�• e .')„S. .• G*, Y."x �: .!+" `�', .:. c 1.:- ' 't, 9''"^. r�.�.'•' +'`�i?fi"=. ' �t'•.-.. .i�'ks'"eaa. ;.�Y�_3. �>> fM•. .> f.-:+f' A. '-� y•rJii � �e _ r. a, y- :r'�•. .Y h,e.>T� r at �- :+- I� r z itS�:iy + ,+ 3•:.f✓ f d�� Sr,; '".' �' �.. - :�•� r $t{,••SUM• 7 ,.'ch,r,• ir.. f:',':, f T �/ s a n` �`,, ei lti^r A!. ) •vi ` "„�F, �,7 � iY.`'��P��� ::s r� � A-F;r ' 1+fi .f{r+r�S :e;,•. a � ;'• fr "-- � °jS.r rA ''��Nkt��f��,�L,� � f. ��i`'r`�,r''s x'''_ � .�f'ta�'r��`�y� .,R„,,�r } t�� rf.�,,, � shy a• � x� i� 3 tr .cc' `�' , t .,� � _ i.. e rktioa.. 1 r j 7lF ' "�5+"-• rir..t y+, r r ^� � 'r, �'.-�"r r'' ,'^ :si��•. ,w 'Y•.f''�� 4�( �': '' � 4"e 5 -a'' y;. {Ak,,: �' ',r,ii+�'�TSt^•;q',y\.s 7 <v 'Cl4.,a �Sai, r x•:v: a:s G _xTc, -l;w Y�.titItS•Pc,-, � j tr';t aYi': Y c� x ,f t+ ,�'tbl•:y rs .: f sr}-r as ty ,-r,-S yam. t•e ri��. +,-a;+ti <rt:- '�4}„-ii,'. � -' •-ir f><•� ' � e'C't .y+1+,%S1; `.h��'.a t''�.�.�-:�. �..r•s=.?',�.; rSs. ,ZIB�s) -^ram.!t,�-;,�'°'t'�<;�..�,�54''��.e�"lht,� �?;�`iv�.,w. ?vd'h�A�j'f'�":T���L•'4t.�i y�*� 1 _�.•..t. Tt i. CQ,�`.6 f.ti l;^�ir'V� I:7 Y,--�r.-yl.y y��, $* R sr•G;.ir iaJ, .fir -r . i` ,r �eq h• kit + � :.4n � , , ,..�'q't.t 'AV lP�,4•��r ,{ s W •.;ri•. ;Y t„y'Ile s P���; 'l';J•a ���: t,/r '�� +'4'�'+$rr ' < ry.;' �' �.. � ��f.� R ..rya• r �y, (,� >i�.:. •' ,,A,,,• f ,L•� /'�1' ,. A �- ��� a � UU.rtC� •ry h.k r'Y . ���� •.Y': ,'�A�r,,ty��.,,.,,,�,� `�:' At:�- 'K.'Y>•4'::a���w :��^ a�t!__iA t �tt•rr r ,A!c��v :,v` v �„'�'n � r .•.��..r':,��'�?''�fr��§`{'(•a E /�'.1f....�3,C. . J� /f k l X.wR1 R I. - -\w \ '• J ! :{ f""Y�:,k; l �,�-♦ f ,�, f..5� r • X%nt, . - tt1 l; { � A e{bt 4 'i•Cr..4 1�� n- '..i /.' �' fit, R�'%.s�i?"'', '.F+yv'y' .,�' y� 1 Sgl�,p? s '7 3, ''v`,•k•`� «.�,�<.,t d';S rJ,v�r�Y.�%',�:e,�i-r+.., aa„✓Y.r <•,�•�.f: � ,.:i� >-tit �.J4�,t!yi..��,"r' 'rfc i. -, ��,�y.rJ':;; •ti''^- � Cc + ;� •;, .+a,� +� r.:�..e•��1•.f� `tom, t�f. v w i:-;qY l��i '� ��`;�'�,{\� '�. ,\��� ,1.. � i�� � .��ir`��''i.�-•�- _ - tee,�s'�rr�'••'i�.7fb�{Y�.F��t1 �a,+,p>� 'n � �� ` y^�,_� ,,_�,/�w+- ,a, "'�' �-�. , �, � '9.+1. �7' ,�-.•. e 9� S ft�� ..ri r.: - _ , ./".,�5 •ht. i s� ,, x,. c.'•: '�yl.ufl�tl�i��r+�a :9s'1.7��.,.a..= t J,I 'a�r ia`��r '�+�``P�i 1 �- ,I;i7 ��.� , ,.� c' ':'•'��i't�.,,,,A�it.�'r� :r��� ...X �.,% .�* � � � -.. :SY-.'S /Y ti-'�^� r r `�� i"-'a��' oi`re,4'4\ �'�^��:"'�•�i ,� � .e �,- 3 �• ,Z.' .'' ?�rf�. +�: \• .. ;1� S :W ,�7".r,�y+T .,i.�7� •�•G .r�, •'f-• .yam I_. � �1r �' �� �•:'-'•1:.»�c hr, rr __.•__x����' 4' It f ,.S �.�•r '7 �Yi '�-• ?Q4.'' rn ���� >��.�^_ .�yr ,' �'i:. �,TiS''.U'�' � dn -� Yll f I '-S$�JkY ,t� a C a; •F�' •' ir,ytr�J. :Z.' �{.sa',# `t�"r' si° rYf i .,•hf�r"..7T�.,^ �� ,,;. « 'Ts. ,1,`�•' '�, v bh< re4 q., ti,.. ,� y� S'. v r��-y;�•$ 3.t: .r ,�. 0.... ` rt.. ? 4.1 ✓- � �� r,. f'���, �°>,T'shy -.t. K � �' -' /}�f.. `,l}:' ` ,�• �"F. Jt3,., • qv ,i.xuB.- .i'E'', a:.. '" s��° tY•- a •• r _ _•� ,{TM5f' •_,}y$ f r"t-`.vC "5 ..•. r7'�f'i: +`e£i.~aai a`s ,tt.vrtl'?ram A' 4 g t`4.1,0" ..'1`. r �,;-vi 4- e �i�aJ+•Y,t ,,4 �,n: e t `' sr „ !''.,��x •}'i{�rit".�t'�w'�4.'�K.�';c-!_ ' t^'.io?''yt�'a• ����"'�r<" 'rb .�♦:��. r '"'� `'� ��b '�._:a`':� •��c -��k�Z.�� •.) • � � ,•��. • M +ts -„fi>.. n.f- �,�,.,.�'-ems r .s .Sl-4.�✓•A `- '4'_.5.7 r� }it �`°'. 1;sci A ,, � ''Y�:..'\ •ti}g. s t + .., j 7 *- r'Y' :•/j< q -:ie. y,:� %?• I.k+t JI � ., Y ��;}:• , �.i'y- k'Ft�•f}!. ", .Xf r' +lY•�ii - `v r r Tt 'X.r.;1,'a,{ .+ N}S� �, yt. �, � 1• '�n y e' a. r' ,F`�. ,•'y ; w. ,;•_y. 'j fr*•l*j•' Y{1 -_7•.�r r . - ;;�.WYr. -}: --a +•„ ma's.:`"�{3It„^T,i� �` �.t• i>r ;! i,.+^'•_ f-r p s r.,��-r.' :L•'�`'r ,�,, •a;'. . :v "`,: :Y"a Capsf >V.m*: G' \� r"°1••.!` a ❑� :L' r:f' y fir. Pl 'r7u' :y. .� �" ��,c•��is:,ri::�.�.( '4�."-�l irco y rn..rR� =11 r � a 1.- J"hy'N.~ �•�.'.:ti:: �.-� +.� \.�- ;y •.b r?�`� ,1'Z�. �'`' :�;�,� ,n�"•f � r .��,; ��, `�9r� ykjl<�,.rF�t�S.' 4 :.�r4a.�: \.i] l-T � yt\<• ti-�� .?4.�4••;,' W�..'� t• .,v..� .7 ,d'�r z�$i1��✓r�� I�_��.;t 'rL.'��•^ a� �. �-.�151 A11 f - +w.�,,,,._ ,s x� Y•''�'.'-�:e:r ..ir:a !4.','X .1 ate +,lY' t ' L y ( ,x;' (I•�re e •�1 - �_ _ •.ar .'�. _�' n`i aa;?>•a'..1.` "7< �" td.. ,>b •t• i .i'J.�..�f!• r - ,�' �. `.- ^;�: i, ^ y..� ,:+ '. r' '�". �k`i.. �.,� fx...,yP •:,4r;±,= �`(Vkc 1 �� l: i+�7`T'.•. i.• ',, xa.A:*t, ZS,J;:»;:��w 4� t - _ '1-.. 1^1 ,ate . b ,,,�.�.r � /:� � _. "t• ~• . C :t' 'bL- . ' -7" 1, •, � _' ' '�+�• ,!(/ r� �. . � - }:1•''+4} �'y�, u;+ 4-5 ;'�4� •`i7�,,, ,yY?•f>., i� 1 a•'s+�.�to `1j t . y�'_Jr >�ix��+.�. .y�,��.: •r �Y�1.�S "•i' Jf.� t (r�,: !�` -�a i- `a 1 � 4 + f t r {1 t+ fi, �7'� � R >�: <i,,2•,- + r�`d � of', 1r�9y{"} `.. _ '!.c1 Y71.�9 ��.J • ��' 1 Z. r Ift .�lL=+� + 7� ^�f.,t �j 6. � _ � I ' h T ,.lr�•,�er ``,�7 \ � K� �'r � !r.ea '.�"-r�! a 1 r 4� y _ ,gr..�s ��". �--ru. "r.FZ-, 3. `yk a." '+ „�-.-k•cr'- t v �the \,Io r: .. ��`*�"M�'�•:,,'A'��Y� '#C+s - .itili,•�, � � '- �y;�r•'4; t � -..r fp.- 7„•„�^� '>�'�,�� r�CN , �• p r K {F �y;a�iu-,dea'>�•Py �.1 _ :.1�!• r� 's: a,: MC.-Ft x. i� � ••e '✓'•r•yo .,ram• � �' r � ti P�."r:..:sr., i• ~�� �* 7f� - �4 ~' "`t� u� '4 � .r � �' - >.i,u ¢• , ;c�;..>i,�`��:T,,"� _ aC�•{ v /'^t v :-'IrG"y,ar r., yrc c .<r/r �'��-S �' ��� � �'-. -^5, r��- lilt, 1�,F.-,',`[f,. � ,,o_ ly-• e :.y .4:.d /!•; yV i "eifi'. ~ �• r aJ zrkS�C S `qY�y i,�h�'+-n,,.yrt^ µ k'T.,.a r - fr }..' ,y y , %a � � � � ~ :�iA'- ..,' 1 '���+flf'•�y�y^� it. 1%� :t-- .cs•. .- ����Y. ,_� � r 4r,• �r•4A'fi•'l.x-. s � _i• ?�i h'r, � .>v�, �T.. .�.t e �rj�c �y�f 1' x 'f. 34, hia d'rY ,:��` � r 1' .5''�v iJr �:a l• �'yit\ _,=r rr�''�.�at'•'ii.,�?., r.�•,r '4 l,c'6• fn,�1'..,� - i• yi r .�,' ./rr <1. ,. €„�r •' ,. i• fi' T-;', ..r- :....w�. • '�!• r 4 yr `^2 •.s''`. '`fir a,5'�. y .r ..•,y i�{,,..s. ^w��..tt rr,]�'`� _ 'e t- Z it• - •`-'' z.;y. f1 1. .v.^srt•. �✓.'- /�� .'La^- _Y �\1 !.� 1 L � 'Y ,• 's•K&`.t C'r'--- ,x.. ��7� key y �� �'�1�,': �07��Zy � ;•-y� ••=%G•; i� •'!'<� '' {.:1-•-�4��. i ♦ a a ,a .ry •.;_;-'�. 'fi�3rt Gy����'•� �( +-'.r, "xr. - ;�,?•-'C •,�,���, r �' J ..'!�- s" �ry .2 - ./.. +,,.t} '.li,.�•.: �i tlt„ ,�C 9 f'r• .L .�,r ,mow?o' •�vr` 4^^:�7r- �''° -"� "t �"-e�'mr+•.1�.;,f 'rl v @�.,v" b� ,:t '4e �jr 5 is t. �� 3 y r r��.r"3. ,r ., ••s•:;.c 1'i'�v���•{'t j. f? 4 , •"p.a�••,. r:F��:;1 a� �Y vr. at u�' ��•s�.S � � 'QCS, ^•• , � 'f°y�' a4 �� 1p+ '` ^M,�, +z� ram- �, �•SP..Wsg' � '^!.; �. ��.,,q,*.��'� -� '::,5 9�d� � n ,'�' LVj .' t� x 1� .�� �.. �r. ��7i�Y►ty�.��+IC ��� (e• .�� {��>��l4�'!� t L ,t �q,�� a:l'�.3� !e f% +,� '�r � ��+''` L �'� �^�'�}�. 'V{j�1��,M '•r17'�=Tom'- �.a' _�' '�►'�'a t "��'� 1 ll�;"[1. Y ,/� A 'l^A'�.4' �'�,�it�1t 'e t � y�`�{*l�n,atc� -v. 3.�It��,C`i�� '1.r: v �� S.?: -��..+Ml.-�"i' '1 s , • '.'r `\*T 1.� `sR}�t�J I�� ..� �. .r�.;`. �a•�ITTT� �Y;y �''r ; .* _ �SG 'y e ��... Ali• -.i.-�yY_1 }' .,. �� � '��;�K t �� f y 50 Am s f.. .!^ 4 •�. _+� may.. (Sr ±^ 1 ^'a( •r�i7� a� 4 11\�•\ ` !._.,�` ,. • ,'t,'��•j Z SBA. Ii� f ' 4 �;*,� '14� r" _ . 4V �,.Q[���1S��`�''.�'\�'r �1�� st '.,�'�' "t,fd�! aF,• � .,.',: y�, ���'�a�iy�_ � a � `�..�w / L �St� ~�rt 1 � q Tom •' ..t< .:li'^;.(� •f• . � &:''' � S�.• ' \� ,♦� ���� �/�:fir' f �►'.�i��'' ►? �' -`(,i� �, i �•1 f R wit .tom .k..�t. �� 'a. >>• wafl 1 J t ` ,1t t/Pn`/fl �__ ` , ; "rw ^a 'i' eZ. �•! ^� — --- V' a Hill 12'DI WATER MAIN a S(DEAD MANGULCH ROAD) DEAD MAN'S GULCH m LEGEND LINEAR FIRE HYDRANT PARK o WETLAND GATE VALVE 12'DI WATER MAIN n (FERGUSON ROAD) OPEN SPACE WATER MAIN w ----- WATER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS j O WATER COURSE LIMITS HOTEL PROPERTY BOUNDARY o CONVENTION CENTER z o' o z z w CD w 12'DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN w o a Y - (DAVIS ROAD) EL .. � ...{ VETFAINARY I Z Y 1 O> V) w m �m a cn w o Q _.. ¢w :..a 10'DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN V)m cli o z w 3 ' o w x u) J 3 U EQUESTRIAN a C9 0 cmi O v CENTER a VIL AGE GR ENLi 12 DU RLEAIRON WATER MAIN JL TO CONNECTION ON BAXTER LANE, 2500 FT EAST y BAXTER LANE BAXTER LANE 1 F �o O COMMUNITY CENTER/ W BED & BREAKFAST CC G i W w � BORH00 o i m NOTE: a ARK x U ALL WATER MAINS ARE TO BE o N' w 8'DUCTILE IRON UNLESS ¢ a ' OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. z `CD cm o cr w Q- M x w w PROPOSED REGIONAL PARK 12'DI WATER MAIN (DAVIS ROAD) C c I-- Lu ma W 12'DI WATER MAIN F (OAK STREET) w w s V) 300 0 300 600 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) OAK STREET OF aJ Q G / � d G LEGEND �- 0 FIRE HYDRANT o_ I ►� GATE VALVE O WATER MAIN ----- L�4�WATER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS WATER COURSE LIMITS PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0 r VETERINARY �Iw 1 N Z Y) O I'� Ifni_ O Z G OI._ O N 2 J'y f .-to a C J = Y /C+7 o 6.L. O r U EQUESTRIAN CENTER . ----------- 0 c I � a W I � • W W J F C F- L) W 0 O d r�- 4 r W • Ld W W 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) B A X T E R LANE M2 OF P O K 4 m LEGEND 4 FIRE HYDRANT ►� GATE VALVE Q WATER MAIN O (� ----- WATER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS 0 4 WATER COURSE LIMITS Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY o ` z w 0 z LLJ F o 0 �r m LNi_ O co Z a O r O III m a L)w C7 n C9 O O u -- -POCKET - ,.,u.Av la I DIU r i a - W 171 W J asM H U O BAXTER LANE a Q o _ 0 ° � w mF- a z COMMUNITY CENTER / W � v' BED & BREAKFAST o - � W CD 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) W _ OF g w a a CER TI FI CA TE OF SURVEY NO. m • - - .LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOCATED IN .THE SE 1/4 & SW >/ T 4 OF SEC. 34, T. 1 S., R. 5 E. That part of the Southwest Quarter and all of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 South, z AND NE 1/4 OF SEC. 3, f. G S., R. 5 E. Range 5 East of P.M.M., and the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 N OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA East of P.M.M. Gallatin County, Montana, all deserted as follows: _ Beginning at the Northeast Comer of said Section 3; UNPLATTED thence southerly 181' 33' 57", assumed azimuth from north, 2660.08 feet along the east line of the i Northeast Quarter of sold Section 3; George E. Westlake- - I I - - thence westerly 270' 07' 11"azimuth 2636.21 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter; UNPLATTED Kay Westlake Martinen I I thence northerly 001' 12' 19" azimuth-2640.28 feet along the west line of said Northeast Quarter; } - I I Simgrof Corp. N 1/2, 110 Fm 2217 I I thence westerly 269' 51' 01' azimuth 1983.12 feet along the,south line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 34; Ln I } 131-266 NW 1/4 SIN 1/¢ III thence northerly 353' 01' 04" azimuth 249.09 feet; COS NO. 233 I( thence westerly 269' 45' 45' azimuth 392.60 feet; I�I I I thence southerly 178' 23' 34' azimuth 246.80 feet; III. Kingma Dairy Partnership I I LOT 1A thence westerly 269' 51' 01" azimuth 248.65 feet along last said south line; _ } I 117 Fm 2776 I MINOR SUB. NO. 145A thence northerly 000'24' 41" azimuth 1996.57 feet along the west fine of said Southwest Quarter; N89'5 o3'19"E � '. Robert Gene Davis - � thence easterly 089' 52' 17" azimuth 1322.67 feet along the south line of Certificate of Survey No. 233; o z 3971.29 I 181 Fm 532C thence northerly 000' 22' 38" azimuth 665.37 feet along the east line of said Certificate of Survey No. 233; o r - - r r�.•� rrr•.� r r. + r ._.i. �.r_ _F�• •_mot, -.- r,r —.— — — — _ thenc eat 0 '-t " azimuth 3971 feet on he north line of the Southwest Quarter and the w I_ ci IL_..-..-..-..-..-. - ._. �... .. �.._..:..-.1 �. .- - ...,,.-._.`�. ;, ,•.- —I northelinesofrithe 9outheast�QuarteF of saidSectian 34;y: N he ea a of the Southeast Quarter t ,� Sandan L.L.C.L.LC. b thence southerly 180' 15' 01" azimuth 2651 80 feet long i east tin a So ast o C, a 168 Fm 1551 of said Suction 34, to he point of beginning. a I II ;: ao t.' � - �`i•,+"� -_- ,.., i :� - �; '".' IZ r ` Area = 20,11,0,770 square feet, 461.6798.acres or 1,868,351.7 square meters. Subject to existing easements. Ronald D. Aafedt - _ CERTIFICATE OF ,EXEMPTION _ Ifl <.�I w_v. `f/ _-��' �''•t_._ . ...p. i ! ,G_SE+Oo.: err: 11..-I r MarY..K. Aafedt - - >- `s O} \ _ �, •-•. r -} r• (RELOCATION OF COMMON'BOUNDARY) m rn I II [N89'52`17 E] z' /.. .-_ ad�1�1` ( ( ^I 1 f... 'I"' - 7j 98 Fm 2342 > `n m I�I `;,1322:67,t ,,:" ,• •' \( ,.-.� .. •�':r /-. 1 t� — We certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate common•boundaries between w ¢w y r „ ,y,r �,;; \�y, ,i; ] , 4 j adjoining properties. Therefore this surveyis exempt from review as a subdivision Q z Q. N� rk �� `` ` - r -y --- 'r � I,/ ' I 11�`- I' I pursuant to Section 76-3-207 1 o MCA. P v~i N w U)0 I T +� Il'�i:. Larry D. Kirkpatrick o c.�o 0 0 } ,, ..•,,,,.,. �. `;\. .= ,.,,tom (`]' I I JI Y P Tract'L5, as shown hereon, is exempt from review as a subdivision by the Montano Department of Environmental - 1 : ,: , :1 J .•-" /'rt"�,-..�J =.� L r-� k. `• A`•r! `2 _`4 Karen S. Lane Quality pursuant to ARM 17.36.605 (2)(b) "Divisions made to correct errors in construction where,a building. shrubs, 15'9,eu3 31 "Srf `!-1 178'Fm 3809, 3811, 3813 or other permanent vegetation may encroach upon the neighboring property." cs _ I16. gees:a L _F EI .( I I .'°q, �y-..- ;7c r,i O o \ \ \ Dated this--- day of ---------' 2000c ..1`q._. "^ .-':may. /f I „'�' ,r - �.If \ Leese Poole Anderson Timothy.W.Anderson ., JWY''.11" F .� �4 STATE OF ONTAN r ` Y - o-`E r�f-- .,31 ri'I�•- '-^ �7� a--° —„t--_•' - _`- 1'7• .:.--I •1— o— — -�'� 'COUNTY OF .t � ) u .Oscar N.Dean On this—day of___—�_,�__ in the year 2000,.before me a Notary Public for .r)e•• t -% 1_.. ; j�4-teWlAtl '1� r ,-�• 1 A'q. - - -� L_- Janis M.Dean the State of Montana, personally appeared Leese Poole Anderson and Timothy W. Anderson, ,f J I . Q 7-1:-':-i 9 Fm 349 known to me to be the persona whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and $ ','"'•• ` ` " - - 2 o e set d and affixed official an r m this certificate s above written. 46 Fm 63 acknowe ged to that they e s n witness whereof, •Ls �„,�+� • �?: ;\. -� ?• 9� LPL's.{{' '` 'a f,I ,,j'.�; "1"j,� C'I ,i_•') I i I it.:I -I hove Ihdreunto me my hen y the am seal.the day d year t 's cert'F to first n. { •^.lam- 1-'' residingat q executed e. o },��..' + �^• {I {} ,'' - J r V f i,/ -I } "� - NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA my commission expires �1 ,�. 1'.. .t•... i r:_ r,,.,�'.L lJ L1 .;_.J-1.�: -.-x.u,=4_. �tL _. -1 L :v-J:S:_ � L'� L.,.:`r..!J"� ' _, „ .. -' ... .. -' _`I l'- -'-1 r --I.1 -::�. .� I Montana Limited Partnership :. ..I. .f ���� i -` .: / :.' ..._ .. .. - BY: J.G.W.,alnc.,.a Montano Corporation, F n r n-r l l'.I Diane E Roe s t�•., .: II� I p h a I 11RogersI General Partner of W.B.C., L.P. (n ls�F r 1It51 { 1—..`t Ben W. 'o! 23 Fm 7427 Dated this __� day of --------' 2000. by. � d r-" STATE OF MONTANA_ :.I Gerald R. Williams, president,J.G.W., Inc. \ I Dionne Peterson I COUNTY OF Nbae 6 rLT I 24:97 9 Acres " I 'I I I f. Mfillitlm R.Paterson �- r/• 245. 9.. -- .. .. _ .. _ ) I _ On this day of ____ in the year 2000, before me o Notary Public for - I Q J 15q 22 Fm 964 1 - �•,�, -,- -: .. .,_ r -c_ -. ,...' _•J..L..- J.7b�7I1. L1 J'1,- % ',J:, - the State of Montana, Personally appeared Gerald R. Williams, Presidan{ of JAW., Inc., a Montana Corporation, a ---- --- - met he person whose erne subscribed to the within instrument an cknowl to m a executed be and behalf of whereof, a W n -- edged a b I UNPLATTED 1983.12 i Li -L t r - , hove hereunto et my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. @ �j589'S1'01"W] residing at known that hi I h to s k j j OC NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA my commission expires (Not Included) I I 1 \ }' l / i LU —� -' I I `' --t ) f 1t \ I- * �1'} ��•a70 } I - CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR 1— I I k'� ` \1 - •..� �v , !� ,I 1, Mark A Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby certify that between IJ III ;�: , ` }'. !1 ./;• i•C ` /r - - :Mar, 22 and Sept._, 2000, this survey was made by me and that this map correctly represents I sold survey and that it conforms to the current Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Sections F- 4 j� ♦ � Y 9 m 76-3-101 through 76-3-625 M-C.A., and the Gallatin County Subdivision Regulations. -0T,7/7-3 Dated this �� day of __—_, 2000. Mark A. Chandler _. 2 1' Do h' " }. S34 Montana Registration No: 9518ES `�M - CERTIFICATE OF'`COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 04 UNPLATTED I I F '� �','- j' %' r - T r'.-� i 'N-' UNPLATTED - I, the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Gallatin County,.Montana, do hereby certify ? t.;r - t ,a-, .' X L Limited that the use of the exemption claimed on the accompanying Certificate of Survey has been duly reviewed and Vesta Fern Anderson I I - - �'' r '�,^ t,✓ Partnership has.been found to conform to the requirements of,the Subdivision and Platting Act, Section 76-3-101 Mary Catherine Nelson ) }` f Et- -� ( gq-81 et. seq., M.C.A., and the Gallatin County Subdivision.,Regulations. Q Marie C. Baxter., I I - _ " _ LAi4> U-. � - k �i r 154 Fm 749-751 - Life Estate III I'\' t, `, I. ( ,- \/ ` yti: i i Dated this ��_ day of.�_—___-- , 2000. 74-534 I } COS NO. 1302 (REM.) \ •{ ,_, �, r ? t I I- Chairman, Board of County Commissioners 2 Fm 1014 dec. I iI Douglas Lance Smith If - - 142 Fm 69 CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER ,.,`�• ' .gilt ;• --,1 J/ -,- r7'. - - I, Joff Krauss, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify toot the accompanying g + 1• Ji I I I 'Certificate of Survey has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be divided have•been paid. W 1 ��✓- .[� - - '- �� �l ;. 4 :1 Dated.this day of —__—_ , 2000: By: eputy Treasurer of Gallatin County W Ld l 2636.2t [N89'52'49"W] I ay I I I CLERK AND RECORDER I - 1, Shelley Vance, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that w 6 J I UNPLATTED the foregoing instrument was filed In my office of__o'clock __.M. this — day of SHEET Joan LewiiUNPLArTs01/2 I 0 I TR 1 A I - �- William H. and Betty -.-_-.-_ _ __, A.D., 2000, and recorded as Certificate of Survey No. i McDonald Land o COS N0. 2007 Anne Sipple Trust. records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. 400 0 400 800 153 Fm 775 Company Limited o I I Io I - I Document Number (SCALE IN FEET) ' Partnership 1/2 I -- ---- 9y Deputy Clerk and Recorder � � 132 Fm 4355 � � I I OF AIIN If�I NINN�NI�I�N�IIN NI Ills N�ll� 2026535 Pass:1 of 1 1till 2"07:63P - mie/lay Vries-Wl Latin ce RT PLAT 7.50 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERS TO SHOW EXISTING TRACT OF LAND SURVEYOR'S NOTES: AND FOR RELOCATION OF COMMON BOUNDARY ONES. ���� • 1. Right of Way Easement to Montort�Power Co., recorded on Film 25, Page 89. across NE 1/4,S c. 3. OWNERS: W.B.C., LP. a Montano Limited Partnership T. 2 S., R. 5 E.. has no location or width specified for the easement. TTIIMOTTHY W ANDERSON N ]tea Fm 4368 LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 & SW 1/4 OF SEC. 34, T. 1 S., Re 5 E. 2. The ditch described in Book 6 of Misc..P. 423 new appears to exist on the east aide of Davie Rood.except for o short length of the ditch(Ground 2GO feet) that lies within L-EMEND AND NE 1/4 OF SEC. 3, T. 2 S, R. 5 E. the SE ,/4 of Seabees 34. near the East Owner Comer of said Section 34. Said Book 6 of Misc.,Page 423 contains conditions end stipulations for the use (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA and maintenance of said ditch. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH N 1/4 Car. Sec. 34 M - II _ 3..Right of way Easement to Montana Power Co., recorded in Book 92 of Deeds. Page 178.across :he • FOUND 5/8 INCH REBAR, NO CAP - Fnd BrossCap. J - 1 /I I 'TRACT. 5 (MN S 1/2•S 1/2.Sec.34, T. 1 S., R. 5 1-.does not specify a location or width for the easement - - "77 � -. - - OR AS NOTED Previous Boundary Linn 60,230 Sq Ft [S89'45'45-W] 1 289'48'45- I l I LEGAL DESCRIPTION. - O SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH PLASTIC I /We I II 1.3827 Aaea 3\DZ60 \ III - - CAP MARKED (C&H #951 BFS) OR AS NOTED � . r ' \ That part of the Southwest Quarter and ell of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34. Township I South. a�R II3 269-45'45• \ It ` III Range 5 East Of P.M.M.,and the Northeast Quarter of Section 3.Township 2 South.Range 5 [N45'00'00'E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZIMUTH SHOWN a t 02.56 1 \ I 1 I,I East of P.M.M. Gallatin County. Montana• all described as follows:. - BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: FAST LINE OF NE 1/4. i oo$p [N06 58 56 aW] v Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Section 3: - - SEC.-3, T. 2 S.. R. 5 E.. BEING 181*33*57• i in z 2GS ' t+r -+��O4(M) - thence southerly 181' 33'57",assumed azimuth from north.2660.08 feet along the east line of the - - - Ou11 UNPLATTEO '. u I f� r�^ 7 24a011 Northeast Quarter of said Section 3: - NW Car.Sec. UNPLATTEO �-ro1 George E. Westla.e I -flia� / II - the westarty 270'07' 11"azimuth 2636.21 feet along the south line of said Northeast Ouarten Frill 2•Al.Cap 9 i7 a Kay westbke Martiner 30 O• io.. 1 / '' thence northerly 0014 12' 19'azimuth 2640.28 feet along the west line of said Northeast Quarter. - � II 3 tpp �Q p Simcrof Coro. N 1/2, I GNI� !1O Fm 2217 _J C A ^�. ty'C' - II thence westerly 26V 51' 01'azimuth 1983.12 feel along the south line of the Southwest Quarter of Said Se:tion 34; 131-266 NW 1/4, SW 1/4 - '� - I I - thence norther 353' 01'04•azimuth 249.09 feet: - - N N i COS NO. 233 I 240. ----- I - thence westerly 269' 45'45"azimuth 392.60 feet; 'n W 1/4 Corner.Sec 34 089'S3'19• 1 2ttQ+y1'01@ New Boundar U a thence southerly 178' 23'34'azimuth 246.80 feet;. - - kmgma Dairy Partnership I 5293.5$ (M)I Y/ I ry - - Nat _ i 1A thence waste 269' S1'Ol'azimuth 248.65 feet aloes last said sautes Gar, N+ Fnd 5/8'tabor•no Cap 117 Fm 7776 \\� - [N89'S3'19eE] R589'51'01'W] II - northerly galong west Imo of said Southwest Ou°rter,. - 8QBp5V19- N<(M) D ETA I L MlRobartUGene Davis A thence easterly 089' 52' 17�-azimuthh 1322.677 fast t along the south line of Certificate of Survey No. 233; - - O NOR OST53'19• \p� C''! (M) �300 I ter Fm 532C thence norlhery 000' 22' 38'azimuth 665.37 feet along the ..at line of said Certificate of Survey No. 2--3-. 1322.27 (M) �Ri4'�\ Qj 3tT71.2>: -L_. �' - thence easterly 089' 53' 1V azimuth 3971.29 feet along the north line of the Southwest Quarter and the - - - N Line of SW 4, N Line of SE 1 4. Sec 34 E 1/4 Comer,.See. 34 north lineof the Southeast Quarter of said Section 34; - - - Sondon L L.C. �, thence southerly 180' 15' 01'azimuth 2651.80 feet along the Seat fine of the Southeast Quarter - 30 I M mo _v.(� `- find Brass Cap 168 Fm 1WA of so;d Section 34.to the paint of beginning. _ r7[7 �`p�°kiou`- 1 SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE 2 Area = 20.110.770 square feet, 461.6798 acres or 1,868,351.7 square meters. Subject to existing easements p 332�ndor [. Existing 60'wide Right of Way Ronald D. Aofedt .'CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION - - .n o [N89'S2'1TE] •o lrypua 1 �° far Count Road - Mary K.Aafedt - -. - < ( ) to Boundo Fm �'� Y I 95 Fm 2342 - (RELOCATION OF COMMON BOUNDARY) a•N- \ 1322.1T7 M c 30 —' we certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate common boundaries between - - _- Ill � - 30 adjoining properties. Therefore thin survey is exempt from review as a Subdivision - - Exi "ng 60' wide County odd ght o ay Easement c � � �i`�\ - E Una of SE 1/4,See. 34 pursuant to Section 76-3-2o7(t)(G).Mu. Existi 10' wide Easemen to Mountaln States Telephone v C T � � � Larry en0. kirV:patrick -` 9 e "" R ��� Koren S.Lone Tract S. as shown hereon,is wempt from rav�aw as a wbdivsion by the.Montana Department of F'ronmen of - - - - '=Sand T egroph Co. per Fl 49. age 1168 o ` $,9 3,317 S Ft Quality pursuant to ARM 17.36.605 2 D 'Divisions made to correct errors in construction where a building. hrubs. P 178 Fm 3809.3811,3813 or other pemwnent vegetation may(e)ncroach upon the net h n _ _ s C £of 24.5' fight of wry to �app�i ate and maintain ditch m � � � 136.6693 Acres � `R� - g DOA' property: - v n par Book Paps 65,receded 8902(DRch has been ; •LS I a 3 //C► ( - replaced by ppe) YAMILRD-BORDER DITI)I a I $^ �• Doted this _-L- day of 2000. x I Z SE 1 4,( SEC. 34 I$n0 �Pooi<Anaerscn Timoth W.Anderaa^ O SW 1 4 SEC. 34 _, I Tr STATE OF MONTANA Y w N w' I y .. Previous Boundary Lines $ COUNTY OF 2dLGA7rAT tf1 nnq N W g n I TRACT 11 I m o 9 I p2� y I Oxar N.Dean On this��OtloY of-.SF2L•Ya�_'m the 2000, before me�'1/ 7l)r*J�N1 � a Not . fJ aC'y Sc 010 3 •es .hats M.Dean the State of Montana, Y�rtyM=1NIr'r- ^ ` o N $ O. tit _ e persons appeared Leese Poole Anderson and withinTimothy W.Anderson, - �g 8.002,500 Sq Ft' o mY O }voo �- 9 Fm 3e9 known to m0 to DB the pars Ons wh05e names ore subscribed to [n@ w:tnin instalment and �:' 'rn ^n a rb £'i ` ----� 46 Fm 2632C acknowledged to me that theyexecuted the some. In witness whereof. '137.7984 Acres I £�N o o rya f4y I 1570.00 to W.C. - 47 I I 1 n ve hNeunto et -"• r�'tt RIA! _ - ` v y my official seal the day and year m this c t@ RISC aDdvtllVnB f�. o c o -Previous Boundary Line [ ] I t.. my nand and affixed �- sal (� o 0 m z o a N89'42'Ot'E //JJI�B(�� -e /tit e ooQr•I r. Stl ;a v Err .. '--'. n r----_--__-_.__�. 089'42'Olx LmNflrir\�/�l.L►'1'i.�74yt residing at 7i N•tl4,W D C#: -wf�� Q I a-c om, m e d o I 1 I 1600.00 - I ) ';�E N IIARY PUHLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA y AZT S - m commission expire -/s 3 E AL /I TRACT 9 a E ^ W m ew aces air he — o s - --' a~,o a rn 1 Y 30.00 �_- o�m m o - `o W W. Diane G....-- 1 o'o W.B.C..LP.o Montano Limited Port�rtyysS1�� m po �' 1 U r a I row W By: J.G.W.. Inc..a Montana CorporoC �i:MO !I General ParNer of W.9.C„ LP. 60.2b F I £�w d a ioo� 0 1 i._ 1 1 A Ben W.Rogers a5,T I _ id7rnn 1 1.3827 Arne o o�Va oi`o i $000 i TRACT 4 o I 23 Fm U27 e a �� ���•�,r \t illifurye / ( ) U I I -S. Doted this day of 2000. �1.- L O I • 1[NO6'S8'S6'W `om,s o of _ _ w I- o o�0 1 1.087.950 Sq Ft o I x o 3 DY W `.W u118��/1{rJ—•` V 333m'04w I, cyc oILO yr� \ 1 p p O l I Dianne Pe7erson WU o I STATE OF MONTANA - Gera10 R.Williams,president•J.G.y`C�, ,.••""••.(�9 Y 1 ,o I 24.9759 Acres I WM,R•Peterson - COUNTY OF ,�T pI - - I -- - 248.09 - z i - 3- 2z F-964 T.1 on this_ aY of SCO1�lA_ n the year 2000.before me Lrr,iltl {firt/aFe�L.a aaF�y3PDb�'!tlA('; 1{- 1 S the State of Montana• personally appeared Gerald R.Williams, president of J.G.W.• Inc., a Montano gopratiowr- -{ - - - known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowled Ilr o , r1t1!83.12� Baxter Lane \ -To `7 5 39 (M) NE Comer• See. 3 baxw1" LlZryt,C o'2 S. that he executes the some, for and on behalf of said corporation. In witness whereof. �tft�•:. f-1L 112603101 v rat"1 li L, '� 26 2'01' a Fnd Braes Cap „otM I have hereunto set _ og. qq S89'S1'01•W \ _ S89' '01• my hand and affixed my official sect the day anal year in this tertifcote first oD wfitt n. nvl UNPLATTED II ] , w [ `N] POW CF WANWO I - I-_ -A raiding of 802,MY.n rlCO••••�tvvly _ a Bruce Eng S Une of SW 1/4, Sec.34 \ Q4 ��,(1111 L J111 I u� commission expires 6121eY ruF NInP - 148-206 / \ NO�'r�UB FOR TH TAT OF MONTANA n1Y xP' c4 98 Fm 4674 N o (Not Included) . III 2647.73 (M) •�. _. III269-51'01• \\ 1 •So I $o OF M,ryyra, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR - - EQ e "Y9 certify that between �I I \ Covt t 2�a uv GOvt. Lot 1 � � 1, Mark A. Chandler, Profass'onal En - - Be i - 1\T' Govt. Lot 4 - pp11 Govt.Lot 3 \ a� I o- uinear and Land Surveyor d at this.do hereby fly � �A� A. Mar. 22 and Sept.2L 2000, this survey was mode by me and that this map correctly represents CKANCILM 1111 2 said survey and that it conforms to the current Montano Subdivision and Platting Act.Sections TRIAICT 3�C ��� tl' gman 76-3-101 through 76-3-625 M.C.A.•and the Gallatin County Subdivision Reg/ulalaations�. N c0 • 06, ,--, y •PF V Q���TTf Doted this Al doy.of—SA- N fR 2000. - I o� 1 0� 7.0 773 Sal Ft a a a s� clsTc W 'k Mark A. Chandler q II .•+ a �'Oe� «^ _ 160�34 Acres j� o2N '\ 810 j' "'G/AEER t - - Montana Registration NO.9518ES Ir s r ;0 3 oG- z "�h CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS o vzr._f o so - ' UNPLATTEO I I 'Z-i e 8 0 1,3 �v - a ,I o um o u :INPLATTF..0 1• the Chairman of the Board of County Comm'aaioners,Golbtin County Montano•do hereby certify - - Vesta Fern Anderson a Wa Q o a tt O°� _e Y v �imrted that the use of the exemption der"wned on the xcompanying CarI Foote of Survey has been duly reviewed and Mary Catherine Velson I Id -u h I - O0 m O "'t ' - 'artnership has been found to conform to the requirements of the Subdivision and Platting Act. Section 76-3-101 E 1 4, SEC. 3£ �" 94-81 at. seq., M.C.A.•and the Gallatin County Subdivision Requlatbnar Ma-�e C. Baxter I ` m c n 01 Y� 1////))�\'')) _ :ife Estate K E p m th o '54 F•n 740-751 �,�_-/I I l (REM.) m- I - m c� Dated thist��-aoy Of�fl3r_`.2000. I 1014 - COS -cs Lance REM, vu- airman. Board of County Commrsaioners _ -- ,� ^_.Fin 1014 dec. I I Oouq'Gs Lance Smitn ;`a - I a o 3 E^ - _ o - '42 Fm 59 .Iota t/ ( I44 W i nWN a CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER - m ov 5 eN I,Jeff Krauss. Treasurer of Gallatin County,Montana.do hereby certify that the accompanying SCate In Fett 5 u tt m� y y property taxes and special assessments C 0 3. S L e 0r.NE 1/4, See. 3 n u^ Certificate of Serve has been del examined oM that on real - 500 0 500 Woo I waN assessed and levied an the land to be divides have been Poid. $ t I E l/4 Comer. Sec. 3 Gated this 13N'day of 2000. B Oe y T re a Gallatin County /- p 150 0 150 .. -� - ---- ----- L�� Fnd PI e - 3 Seale In Afete" 29 /F"'e` - I � / �T 1�7p�ppT� .�} 1 270'OTila(M) I � CLERK AND RECORDER �/w•!•r_ 3 MMUNNFMING AM / I I [N89'S2'49'W] I W c I I I I, Shelley Vance. Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin Coou_!A_Montarki. hereby certi .•ewywxe.va+AyG INC. 1 4 Comer, Sec. 3 S 1 O1 ty� foregoing instrument as filed in my office can o'clock M.this Ce�E� a71Jt(6'Jb TJjr IVNPuInEO \\ UNPLA TTED T �� A:D.• 2000,and recorded as Certificate of Survey No. - -a Fnd Alum. Cap an \\'Aram H, and Betty M Y Joan Lewis 1/7 I TR i A •Chu L4lwfae•aowdawl L�a.tie•Lea Anne Sipple Trust records of the Clerk and Recorder,Gallatin County, Montano. I I McDonald Land ' COS NO.2007 !,. ' PD 2415 Till Yaia Sfreel.3117te I 1loumtn,YoBtaaa 6671E Company Limited I o 153 Fm 775 4llt 561-1116•hs 466 6R7-r1Y•t' IleCl6(9fAe6lP1f1.6e1 Partnership 1/2 I o Document Number� � ey: _. 132 Fm 4365 I I duty Clerk and Recorder /0OO(9 3(C) _ v a Exhibit"M" Water A I r ._tee-�.� -._. -._ :. �:. •- ...,�,_ -_ _ _ ._._ .. R_ � -. _�.,•... -. eta. ..,.�-•' -a=3yY�,-... a I • i, I ' I€ I , I I I I 4'01� •I • TEMPORARY I I GAZEBO I 1 , j F� I II I I , I I � I � Ica • • • I it • I 11 I I I I� • • I ' I I I I I I I I I II I I I TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION i RAILER I I • TEMPORARY SIGNAGE ED/BREAKFAST LOCATIONS JEMPORARY *PERMANENT SIGNAGE 'MODI ES HOME LOCATIONS � • SALES CENTER_:' BARN/COMMUNITY [_'] PERMANENT SIGNAGE WILL ALSO CENTER BEAT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS (NOT SHOWNON THIS MAP) [CONSTRUCTION PORARY- -INTERSECTION OF BAXTER LN & DAVIS RD RACE AREA -INTERSECTION OF O O BAXTER LN & RIATA RD -VETERINARY CLINIC -EQUESTRIAN CENTER MITHUN PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NO. BAXTER MEADOWS 01236 DRAWMG TITLE DATE Architects+Designers+Planners TEMPORARY FACILITIES PLAN-EXHIBIT"P" 10/19/01 Pier 56,12oi Alaskan Way, Ste.200 Seattle,WA 98101 TEL 2o6 623.3344 FAX 2o6 623.7005 COPYRIGHT©2001 MITHUN,INC. • p Appendix "A" Baxter Meadows 10/19/01 OCT- 16-01 09: 53 FROM,ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID.:4064475036 PAGE 2/26 Geoteclhni Appendix A - Soils Report December 20,2000 Project 005256 Mr.Gary Swanson,PE (3) Robert Peccia&Associates P.O.Box 5653 Helena,Montana 59604-5653 Dear Mr.Swanson: Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation,Baxter Meadows Subdivision,Bozeman,Montana We have completed the preliminary geotechnical evaluation you authorized on November 8,2000. The purpose of the preliminary evaluation was to assist your firm in evaluating subsurface soil and groundwater conditions related to infthration.basins,streets, utilities and structures. These services were performed in accordance with our cost estimate to you dated,November 3,2000. Summary of Results Three soil borings and four test pits were performed in the middle portion of the proposed subdivision. The general soil.profile encountered-by the borings and test pits was up to I `A feet of organic clay topsoil underlain by alluvial clays-to depths generally ranging from 2 to 7 feet over dense to very dense.alluvial • gravels. Groundwater was generally observed at depths ranging from 2`/z to 6 %:feet. - - The fieldwork also included three basin flooding tests and.12 percolation.tests. The results of these tests- are included,and will assist in the design of infiltration basins. Summary of-Preliminary-Analyses-and•Recommendations_ Pavement sections for subdivision streets have been included in the attached.report. Alternative sections for soft and stiff clay subgrades are provided. The.soft subgrade section includes a woven.geotextile fabric directly on the soft clay subgrades.'Soft subgrades should be anticipated near existing streams and irrigation ditches as well as areas where high groundwater and poor surface water drainage exists. Crushed base and subbase sections have been included for stiff subgrade soils. Installing water and sewer lines in the.subdivision will be relatively difficult due to the high groundwater levels. Significant dewatering will be necessary to create.dry.trenches for installation. In 4-foot deep utility trenches where clay-soils are encountered in the bottoms,we anticipate Type II bedding will be needed to provide stable trench bottoms. . The borings and test pits•indicated the alluvial clays are potentially collapsible,Le.,will consolidate if they become wet or saturated, causing foundations and slabs supported above them to settle excessively. More detailed geotechnical evaluations are recommended once the building locations and dimensions have been selected. During the speck geotechnical evaluation,samples will be collected to confirm the presence of collapsible soils and their impacf on building design. Some altematives have been included in the attached report that have been used on other Bozeman projects where collapsible soils were encountered- • 261 I Cabcl Road P.O.Box 90190.B:U.� sauna 69 1 03-0 1 9 0 Pi%onc(4M 652.59so. Fix:(406)653-3944 605'N ales Drive-P.O.Box 5006.B=_=man.Monufv.69i 16-5003 Phone-(406)6&53(1 t:.Fie(406)5a&;Sa6 1911%ieadowlark Lae.P.O.Box 5026.Burce.Atonrana 697 OZ.i026 Phone(406)49i-1676c Fie(406)494-1675 OCT-19-01 09 : S3 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PACE 3/26 Robert Peccia&Associate December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 2 General b, Please refer to the attached report for more detailed results of our fieldwork,preliminary engineering analyses and recommendations. Thank you for using SK Geotechnical. If you have any questions regarding this report,or require our services during the construction phase of this project,please call Greg Staffileno at(406)652-3930. Z, Sincere T Reno,PE - Principal,Geotechnical Engineer gts:khr Attachment: Preliminary Geotechtiical Evatuation-Report--- c: SKGeotechnical(Butte).` b- • OCT-16-01 09 - S4 FROM.ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 4/26 Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction.............._............................................................................................................................. 1 A-1. Project-------_._................................................................. ....................................................... A2. Purpose of the Preliminary Evaluation...................._..........................................-------. *---------.---1 A3. Scope•.-------•--..:...............................................................................................:_... A.4. Documents Provided.................•-------•----.............--••--•.._.........................------------•----•-•--------_...._..2 A-5. Locations and Elevations-•..........................................................................................................2 B. Results-------................... .... .......................................................................•----.._._...............................2 B.I. Logs...._....................•..........._........._..........----..............----•----..........................._................•----...._2 B2- Site Conditions.......................................................:.............................................:......................3 B.3. Soils................................. 3 --.......................................................................................................... B.4. Groundwater Observations...:.::..:.::::::..:.:..................................................................•---...---•--.••---4 B.S. Basin Flooding Tests....................... ............. -..............:.......:...................5 B.6. Percolation Tests........................................................................................................................6 C. Preliminary Analyses and Recommendations........................................................................................6 C.I. Proposed Construction...............................................................................................................6 C2. 'Infiltration Basins............... .............................:...........................................................6 C.3. Pavement---.-...._........ ......7 • CA. Utilities...-......-...:.......................................•:-............. ................................................................. C.S. Building Foundations and Slabs.............................................._.....................................................9 C.6. Geotechnical Evaluations:....:.:............................................................................._.....---------•-....10 D. Procedures-............................................................................................................................................II D.I. Drilling and Sampling.... ................ . D-2. Test Pits............................•--..............................---..................-•-•----•---..................---•-----------•-_...11 D.3. Basin Flooding•and Percolation Tests...................... ..,...........................................................11 DA. Soil Classification...........::.................................................................................-.....................I I . D.5. Groundwater Observations................................. ................................................................•-_..12 E. General Recommendations........................................................................................_........................12 E_1. . Basis of Preliminary Recommendations............._................_....__......................--------------------12 E2.'.. Groundwater Fluctuations.. : ............................................._.....-•-•----...............1.............:........12 E3. Use of Report..........................................................................................._................................12 EA. Level of Care-_..:..... .......................................................................................-....--..........I3 OCT-IS-01 OS : S4 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 5/26 "Table of Contents(continued) Description Page Professional Certification Appendix Site Location Sketch' Test Location Sketch Water and Sewer Site Plan Descriptive Terminology Log of Boring Sheets ST-I through ST-3 Log of Test Pit Sheets TP-1 through TP-4 ASTIVI - Log of Test Pit Sheets TP-1 through TP-4 USDA Classification Tests(3) PercolatiomTests(12) Basin Flooding Tests Data and Graphs ' OCT-16-01 09 = S4 FROM<ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . I13=406;WS036 PACE 6/26 A. Introduction A.1.• Project Baxter Meadows Subdivision is located on the northwest side of Bozeman,Montana. The proposed subdivision is shown on the attached Site Location Sketch. A-2_ Purpose of the Preliminary Evaluation. The purpose of the preliminary geotechnical evaluation was to assist Robert Peccia&Associates in evaluating subsurface soil and groundwater conditions related to preliminary design of infiltration basins, streets,utilities,building foundations and slabs. A3. Scope The desired scope of services was outlined in a letter dated October 20,2000. On November 3,2000,we submitted a fax transmittal including our cost estimate and authorization for services. Mr.Gary Swanson, PE,of Robert Peccia&Associates(RPA),authorized us to proceed on November 8,2000. Our scope of services was limited to: • reconnaissance of the site by a geotechnical engineer, • coordinating the :ocating of underground utilities near the test locations, • conducting three penetration test borings to a depth of 25 feet or auger refusal,then completing these borings as temporary piezometers, • performing three test pits to a depth of about 8 feet, conducting three basin flooding tests, conducting 12 percolation tests, • returning samples from the borings to our office for visual classification and logging by a geotechnical engineer, - — • performing three classification tests and three corrosion tests on samples, • analyzing the results and discussing the project with personnel from RPA,and • OCT-16-01 OS : S4 FROM:ROBE PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 7/26 Robert Peccia&Associates December 20,2000 Project 005256 page 2 • submitting a preliminary geotechnical evaluation report containing logs of the borings,results of our laboratory tests,and preliminary recommendations related to infiltration basins,streeu, utilities,building foundations and slabs. AA Documents Provided The following documents were provided for our use: • A five-page table prepared by Wetlands West,Inc.,created September 18,2000, describing static water level readings obtained in monitoring wells and piezometers installed on the site. • A soil survey report addressing the textural classifications of the soils in the area. The cover - letter of thisreport was dated September 22,2000,and was prepared by Kimberly A.Donze, volunteer. • RPA provided us with several-site maps of the subdivision_ We were eventually provided with a site map showing,the test locations;-which has been included with this report_ This site map does not indicate the date it was prepared. A.5. Locations and-Elevations • Boring,test pit,basin flooding test and percolation test locations were selected by RPA with some assistance from our personnel. The preliminary evaluation was focused on the middle portion of the proposed subdivision,which is shown by the hatched area on the Site,Location Sketch. Locations are shown on the Test Location Sketch in the Appendix. Survey personnel of RPA determined the locations and elevations of the specific tests. Penetration test borings are designated by the prefix"ST,"test pits by the prefix"1?," basin flooding tests by the prefix"BFT,"and percolation tests by the prefix"PT.- D. Results 13.1. Logs Log of Boring and Log of Test Pit sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata,the penetration resistances,laboratory test data and water level information are attached_ The soils encountered in the test pits were visually classified and logged in accordance with two methods-. (1) American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM)Unified Classification System,and(2)United States Department of Agriculture(USDA)Textural Classification System. Logs.of the same test pits were therefore prepared with these classification systems: • OCT-16-01 OS : SS FROM :ROSERT PECC I ASASSOC . I D:406447SO3G PAGE 6/26 Robert Peccia&Associates • December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 3 It should be noted the depths shown as boundaries between the various.soil strata encountered by the borings and test pits are only approximate. The actual changes may be transitions and the depths of the changes vary between the borings. Geologic origins presented on the logs are based on the soil types,penetration resistances and available common knowledge of the.depositional history of the site. A detailed evaluation of the geologic history of the site was not performed. B.2. Site Conditions The proposed development is located on the northwest side of Bozeman,Montana. Bozeman is situated in alluvial fan deposits emanating from the mountains to the south. The alluvial fans are associated with the mountain streams,which have created channels across the valley. These channels have filled in with clay soil,while the subgrade is alluvial gravels. The depth to the alluvial gravel therefore varies. We, have found these variations can occur within relatively short distances,dependent on the locations of buried channels. The site is relatively level and appears to have a gradual slope downward towards the north at a slope ranging from '/z to 1'Yz percent. Several mountain streams-are:runnint north and south across the,site. • Several irrigation ditches generally running in an east-west direction are also located on the site." The site consisted of an irrigated alfalfa field and was covered with about 6 inches of snow at the time of our fieldwork. s B3. Soils The soil borings and test pits generally encountered a similar soil profile. Organic clay and organic silt topsoil was encountered at the surface-to dep'zhs ranging from 0.6 to 1.3 feet. Beneath the topsoil,the soil borings and test pits generally encountered lean clay and silty clay alluvium to depths ranging from 1.9 to 7.3 feet,underlain by gravel alluvium. The exception is Boring ST-1,where gravel alluvium was encountered directly beneath the organic clay topsoil. The clay alluvium was deepest at Boring ST-3, Test Pits.TP-2 and TP-3. These borings and test pits are likely located in the buried stream channels previously described. They may not represent the maximum depth of alluvial clays. As previously indicated,the test pits have-also been classified in accordance with their USDA textural classification. Similarly,topsoil was encountered in these test pits to depths ranging from 0.6 to 1.3 feet, underlain by silty clay loam and silt loam to depths ranging from 1.8 to 73 feet_ Beneath the clay and silt loams,the four test pits encountered alluvial gravels,which are referred to as very gravelly sand,very gravelly cobbley sand,and extremely gravelly loamy sand. (The USDA method classifies based on sand-, silt-and clay-size particles;gravel particles larger than 2 millimeters are excluded-) • OCT-18-01 OS : 55 FROM:ROSE PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064 75036 PAGE S/26 Robert Peccia&Associates ' December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 4 Penetration tests were conducted in the borings. Penetration resistances in the alluvial clay generally ranged from 6 to 8 blows per foot(BPF),indicating they were medium consistent. In Boring ST-3,a clay layer with a penetration resistance of 25 BPF was encountered below 3 '/z feet,indicating it was very stiff. Penetration resistances in the alluvial gravels ranged from 24 BPF to 50 blows for 3 inches of penetration, but were generally greater than 38 BPF. These values indicated the gavel alluvium was medium dense to very dense,but generally dense to very dense. B.4. Groundwater Observations B.4_a. Measurements. Table 1 below summarizes the depths and corresponding elevations groundwater was observed in the borings and test pits. Temporary piezometers were installed in all of the borings and test pits,and groundwater depths were rechecked on November 29,2000,by personnel with RPA. That information is therefore included in the below table. Table 1. Groundwater Depths and Elevations= Drilling Measurements* 11129/00 Recheck Measurement -_ Boriag or Surface,. Depth to Corresponding Depth to Correspon Test Pit Elevation Groundwater,feet Elevation Groundwater,feet Elevatio ST-1 4691.9 4 4688 4 4698 • ST-2 46882 7 4681 ` 2'/x 4685%s ST-3 46842 7'/-_. 4676'/2 I 4%z 4680 _ TP-1 4691.4 6'/2 4685 4 4687 TP-2 4683.8 ,7 'h 4676'/: 5%: 4679 TP-3 4691.5 7'/z 4674 I 6'/s 46751 TP-4 4687.6 7 4680'/2. ( 5'/ 4682 *All measurements rounded to the nearest%:foot.. Recheck measurements on 11/29/00 provided by.RPA. BA.b. Waterbearing Stratum and Mottling. Groundwater_was observed in the alluvial gravels in ST- 1,TP-1 and TP-4. Groundwater was observed in the alluvial clays in ST-2,ST-3,TP-2 and TP-3. Groundwater levels can fluctuate in unison with water levels in the existing creeks and irrigation ditches. It has been our experience that groundwater levels are generally at their lowest in the winter and at their highest in the fall. In the Bozeman area,the highest groundwater levels generally occur during fall irrigation. The piezotneters on the site can be monitored to better evaluate groundwater fluctuations. • OCT-18-01 09 : SS FROM:ROBERt PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406441SO36 PAGE 10/,26 Robert Peccia&Associates i December 20,2000 Project 005256 - Page 5 Test pits were performed to better observe.the subsurface soils. The test pits expose sufficient soil to check for mottling in the sidewalls. Mottling would generally be expected in cohesive soils,such as the alluvial clays/clay and silt foams. Mottling is'an indication of previous high groundwater levels. No mottling was observed in the sidewalls of Test Pits TP-1,TP-3 or TP-4. In Test Pit TP-2,slight mottling was observed from 1 to 4 %: feet,while it was strongly mottled below 4 Yz feet_ This is an indication that groundwater in TP-2 has risen to a depth of 4 `/feet_ This depth corresponds to an elevation of 4679`/. B.S. Basin Flooding Tests B.5.a- Procedures. Three basin flooding tests(BFT)were performed at the site. These tests were performed in accordance with Section 3.4.1 of Process Design Manual,Land Treatment of Municipal Wastewater,USEPA, 1981. Tensiometers were not used in 3FT-1 or BFT-2 due to the presence of gravel alluvium. A tensiometer was used in BFT-3,however,showed no response during the test_ d The BFT tests were performed by constructing a 10-foot diameter basin surrounded by sheet metal. Bentonite chips were paced around the bottom to seal the base. The subgrade soils at the basin flooding tests are summarized in Table 2 below_ •! Table-2- Basin Flooding Tests Depths and Subgrade b P o Subgrade Corrosion Tests Test Depth Resasimty' ASTM USDA pH ohm/cm BFT-I 24- Silty Gravel with Sand Very Gravelly Loamy Sand 7.4 1,600 8FT-3 , 54- Well Graded G.mvcl with Sand Very Gravelly Cobblcy Sand 7.6 6.300 BFT-3 6" Lean Clay with Sand Silty Clay Loam 6.0 2,600 Bag samples of the subgrade soils were collected for classification tests, including grain size and Atterberg limits. The results of these tests are attached to this preliminary geotechnical repots The tests were performed in accordance with the method indicated above. Vertical control points were installed at each test site and water surface elevations were determined using a wire hook and caliper capable of measuring to the nearest 0.1 millimeter(mm). The basins were flooded about 12 hours before beginning the test to saturate the subgrade soils. The basins were then refilled and the infiltration rates measured at appropriate intervals and recorded The cumulative infiltration and infiltration rates were plotted on the log log paper as described in the test procedure. These graphs are attached • OCT-16-01 09 : SE FROM=ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:406447S036 PAGE 11/26 Robert Peccia&Associates : i _ _ December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 6 ' Corrosion tests consisting of pH and resistivity were performed on the same three samples. The results of the corrosion tests are indicated in Table 3 above. The pH of the samples ranged from 6 to 7.6. The resistivities ranged from I,600 to 6,300 ohms per centimeter. B.6. Percolation Tests Twelve percolation tests wer--performed at the Iocations indicated on the attached sketch. The percolation tests are labeled PT-1 through PT-12..The tests were performed in accordance with Montana Department of Environmental Quality Circular DEQ-4;"Montana Standards for On-Site Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems,"2000 edition. NVe had obtained a preliminary copy of this circular,which included the test method_ Assuming this method-would be adopted,the percolation tests were performed in accordance with the current procedure. The results of the percolation tests are attached. As can be seen,the percolation rates-ranged from 8 to 400 minutes perinch(mpi). The actual percolation rates are highly dependent on the subgrade soils in the percolation test holes and sidewalls. In general, percolation rates ranging from 8 to 27 mpi were generally observed in the alluvial gravels. A percolation . rate of 43 mpi was observed in silty clayey gravel material. Percolation rates in the lean clay ranged from 150 to 4.00 mpi. C. Preliminary Analyses and Recommendations C.I. Proposed Construction - A general layout of the proposed development is shown on the Water and Sewer Site Plan prepared by RPA. The site will be developed for single-family residential and will include condominiums and townhouses. The development will also include commercial property and buildings. The Site Plan shows numerous streets running through the development. At this time,a centralized wastewater treatment plant is anticipated for the entire development,although the subdivision could be attached to the city sewer system. The plant will treat wastewater and eventually discharge relatively clean water into infiltration basins. Waterlineswill likely be buried approximately 4 feet below paved roads. Sewer lines will likely be buried 4 to 12 feet:below roads..' C.2. Infiltration Basins The results of the basin flooding and percolation tests are attached to this report. RPA will likely utilize this information to assist in their design of infiltration basins and discharge areas for treated water_ The log-log graphs and test data for the BFT tests are attached. The test results for BFT-1 and BFT-2, which represent the alluvial gravels,show good linear relationship. The Series 1 results for BFI'-2, however,appear to contain at least two points scattered off of the linear relationship_ We are unsure of • OCT- 16-01 09 : 56 FROM:ROBERr PECCIASASSOC . ID:406 75036 PACE 12/26 Robert Peccia&Associates December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 7 the cause of the two points. We have also thoroughly reviewed the test method,and it does not appear to contain a description of how to interpret the graphs. C3.. Pavement. C3.a. Stripping. The borings and test pits indicated 0.6 to 1.5 feet of organic clay and topsoil are present in the middle portion of the proposed subdivision. It has been our experience.that the topsoil thickness in Bozeman generally ranges from 1 to 2 feet thick. We therefore.suggest using an average thickness of topsoil of 1 `A feet for estimating purposes. We recommend the organic clay topsoil be removed from beneath proposed pavement areas,and the depth of removal should be determined by observations during stripping. a. C3.b. Subgrade and Pavement Thicknesses. The subgrade conditions encountered during construction will generally govern the required pavement thicknesses for streets. Table 3 below contains three alternative pavement sections for automobile and truck pavement areas. We,recommend using Alternative 1 when soft subgrades are encountered during construction_ We recommend using Altematives 2 or 3 when stiffer subgrades are encountered. Sort and stiff subgrades are discussed in more detail below. Table 3. Alternative Pavement Sections Alternftive Automobile Areas Truck Areas 1. Geotextile Section Asphalt Surface 3" 3" /4" or 1 I/T Crushed Base Course - - 4" 4" 3"Minus Sandy Gravel Subbase Is" 18". Woven Geotextile Fabric On Subgrade On Subgrade 2. Crushed Base Sectioa Asphalt Surface 3" 3" 1/4"or 1 t/z"Crushed Base+Course 9" 14" 3. Subbase Section - Asphalt Surface 3" :3" '%-or 1 %z'Crushed Base Course 4"3•Minus Sandy Gravel Subbase 8 C3.c. Soft Subgrades. Soft subgades are identified by clay soils that cannot support the conventional construction equipment_ Soft subgrades typically consist of lean clays having unconfined compressive strengths of 1;000 pounds per square foot(psf)or less. Construction equipment,such as blade scrapers, • dump trucks and cement trucks,typically create ruts or get stuck in soft subgrades. The soft subgrades OCT-16-01 09 : SS FROM:ROBE T PE8CIASA.SSOC . I13 :4064475036 PAGE 13/26 Robert Peccia&Associates December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 8 a can be identified during construction by either performing unconfined compressive strength tests directly on the exposed clays or by observations of proof rolling_ Proof rolling can be performed with a loaded dump truck-or front-end roller. The deflection beneath the tires can be observed,and if it exceeds 1 inch, the clay soils should be considered soft Soft subgrades are relatively.common in the Bozeman area and have resulted in significant change orders during construction. Soft subgrades should be anticipated near streams,irrigation ditches,•and wherever high groundwater and/or poor drainage of surface water are present. In many instances,soft subgrades are also created.during construction. This occurs after the contractor has removed the surficial topsoil and the underlying clays have been exposed. It then rains or snows,which saturates the surface of the exposed clays. Once these exposed clays become saturated,their strengths decmasee-significantly and they become not suitable to support construction.equipment. It is therefore advantageous to construct streets during mid-summer to late fall,after the Bozeman evening showers are not as common. Even so, one rainstorm can significantly sanuate the exposed clays and result in construction delays and/or change orders_ To provide a suitable platform for construction equipment,we recommend placing a woven geotextile fabric directly on the soft clay subgrade. Gravel subbase can then be carefully placed directly on the ' fabric by end dumping in*accordance with the fabric manufacturer guidelines. The.subbase is placed in • one lift, and then covered with a Ieveling course for paving. C.3.d. Stiffer Clays. Stiffer clay subgrades will also likely be encountered in the subdivision. Stiffer clays can be identified by having unconfined compressive strengths of greater than 1-1,000 psf. During proof rolling,deflection beneath the loaded truck will be less than I inch. When stiffer clay subgrades are encountered,we recommend using alternative pavement sections 2 and-3 indicated in Table 3 above. For these sections,we recommend the upper 6 inches of the resulting subgrade be scarified,moistened to'a moisture content near optimum and recompacted to a minimum of 95 percent of their maximum dry densities determined in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM)Method of Test D 698 (standard Proctor)_ - CA. Utilities C_4.a. Materials. The corrosion tests indicated the subgrade soils were generally not corrosive to metallic conduits. Additional tests should be performed to further evaluate the corrosivity of the on-site soils. We generally recommend specifying non-corrosive materials or providing corrosion protection for underground utilities. • OCT- 16-01 OS : 57 FROM-ROBERT PECCIASASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 14/26 Robert Peccia&Associates ` December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 9 The borings indicate the subgrade beneath the 4-foot deep water lines will be lean clays and alluvial gravels. The lean clays generally become softer with depth,as the groundwater level is approached. It is our opinion'that when lean clays are encountered beneath shallow utilities,they will likely be excessively soft and Type II bedding per Montana Public Works Standard Specifications WWSS)will be needed. Beneath the deeper sewer lines,we anticipate the subgrade will be alluvial gravels. In gravel subgrades, we anticipate Type I bedding.will be suitable for utility support It is our opinion that on-site soils from the trench excavations can be used as backfill above beddin.-. C.4.b. Dewatering.' As previously indicated,groundwater measurements in the piezometers ranged from 2 '/s to 6 %:feet. Installing the proposed water and sewer lines will therefore require significant dewatering. The method of dewatering will depend on the contractor's experience and equipment. It is important to select contractors familiar with significant dewatering operations that will be needed during the utility installations. If the groundwater is within 1 to 2 feet of the proposed utility depth,high-volume dewatering sumps may be capable of dewatering portions of the trench. These sumps are typically installed 2 to 3 feet below the bottom of the trench in perforated pipes. Spacing of the sumps will depend on the volume of water and. permissivicy of the gravel alluvium. A sump is then placed in the perforated pipe and collected • groundwater is discharged well away from the trench excavation. If the groundwater is 2 feet or more above the bottom of the trench, it will likely be necessary to install dewatering wells along the trench corridor. Similarly,the spacing and depth of the dewatering wells will depend on the groundwater level encountered during construction and permissivity of the gravels. C.S. Building Foundations and Slabs CS-a- Collapsible Soils- It has been our experience that the alluvial clays in the Bozeman area are moderately to highly collapsible,Le will_consolidate when they become wet,causing structures supported above them to settle. Collapsible soils can be evaluated by obtaining thin-walled tube samples of the alluvial clays and performing one-dimensional.consolidation tests. They can als6 be visually anticipated by observing pinholes in the alluvial clays. As.can be seed on the test pit logs,pinholes were observed in Test Pits TP-2 through TP-4. We therefore anticipate collapsible soils are present on the site. Several corrective measures can be utilized when constructing buildings and slabs on collapsible soils. The most common method is to subexcavate the alluvial clays from beneath the entire building pad (foundations and slabs)down to the alluvial gravels,then replace t:hese.soils with compacted.3-inch minus sandy gravel. Depending on the thickness of the alluvial clays and groundwater levels,dewatering may be necessary. This method was utilized for the new United States Post Office building and Target store. i OCT-16-01 09 : 57 FROM :ROSERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4O6447S036 PAGE 15/26 Robert Peccia&Associates December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 10 Another alternative to consider is to only provide corrective measures beneath the foundations,and float the slab on the collapsible soils. For this alternative,the foundations can be extended down to the alluvial gravel,or placed on compacted sandy gravel backfill placed over the alluvial gravels. The floor slab is supported directly on the alluvial clays. If this alternative is selected,the owner must assume the risk of potential excessive floor settlement occurring because the collapsible soils were not removed. For example,a broken or leaking water line will saturate the underlying clays,causing_thean to consolidate. The slab above the leaking line then settles and significant cracking of the floor slab occurs. This alternative was selected for the Dot y Dickinson School. C.6. Geotechnical,EvaIuations We recommend geotechnical evaluations be performed for specific buildings once their location, dimensions and loads have been determined. Geotechnical evaluations typically include soil borings and/or test pits performed at the building corners to identify the thickness of topsoil,alluvial clays and depth to the underlying'gravels. The evaluations will assist designers-and contractor to evaluate the following items_ • the presence of buried channels in the building area, approximate groundwater levels and their effect on design and c=struction, • • the presence of collapsible soils and recommendations related to corrective measures beneath foundations and slabs, • allowable bearing capacity and potential settlement and heave for foundation design, • pavement subgrade condition inthe subdivision as well as specific building parking lots, • cortosivity to underground utilities,and other geotechnical aspects related to the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. As can be seen on the Site Location Sketch,this preliminary geotechnical evaluation was focused-on the middle portion of the subdivision. A significant portion of the proposed subdivision was not evaluated by our firm. Additional geotechnical evaluation throughout the subdivision is also recommended. • OCT-16-01 09 = 57 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 16/26 Robert Peccia&Associates • December 20,2000 Project 005256 0 Page I I D. Procedures D.1. Drilling and Sampling The penetration test borings were performed on November 9 and 10,2000,with a truck-mounted core and auger drill. Sampling for the borings was conducted in accordance with ASTM D 1586,"Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils.'" Using this method,we advanced the borehole with hollow-stem- auger to the desired test depth. Then a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches drove a standard,2-inch OD, split-barrel sampler a total penetration of I ;/z feet below the tip of the hollow-stem auger. The blows for the last foot of penetration were recorded and are an index of soil strength characteristics. Prior to withdrawing the hollow-stem auger from the borings,PVC pipe with a well-screen section at the bottom was placed in the borings to permit long-term monitoring,of groundwater levels,on the site. We - suggest that personnel with RPA or the owner continue to monitor groundwater Ievels in the piezometers. Several of the borings encountered very dense gravel alluvium. When the sampler could not be driven 6 inches with 50 blows of the hammer,the distance the sampler was advanced with 50 blows was recorded. When this situation occurred during the first 6 inches of the drive,it was noted as occurring within the wSeLn • D.2. Test Pits The test pits were excavated on November 8,2000. The soils encountered in the test pits were visually classified by our geotechnical engineer. After completion of the logging,the test pits were backfilled. It is likely that this backfill placed iri jt a test pits was compacted to less than 85 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. This backfilfis therefore not suitable to support proposed building foundations and slabs. If present beneath a proposed building pad,we recommend the backfill in the test pits be re-excavated and then be replaced as compacted backfill. If this occurs,the backEl should be placed in lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. The on-site soils can be used,however,3-inch minus sandy gravel is generally the best material. D3. Basin Flooding and Percolation Tests The procedures and methods for the basin flooding and percolation tests have been previously described in this report- Additional tests may be needed to better evaluate infiltration and permeability characteristics of subsurface soils. DA. Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in accordance • with ASTM D 2488,"Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils(Visual-Manual OCT-18-01 0B : S6 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 17/26 Robert Peccia&Associates• December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 12 Procedures)_" A summary of the ASTM classification system is attached. As previously.indicated,the soils in the test pits were also visually classified and logged in accordance with USDA Textural Classification system. All samples were then returned to the laboratory.for a review of the field classifications by a geotechnical engineer. Representative samples will remain in our office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. D.S. Groundwater Observatious About 10 minutes after taking the final sample in the.bottom of a boring,the driller probed through the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater_ Immediately after withdrawal of the auger, the driller again probed the depth to water or cave-in. The boring was then backfilled. E. General Recommendations E.I. Basis of Preliminary Recommendations The preliminary analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Often,variations occur between these borings,the nature and extent of which do not become evident until additional exploration' or construction is conducted. As recommended in the report,geotechnical evaluations should be • performed for specific buildings and structures. E.2. Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level observations in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the . boring togs. These data were interpreted ih the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short,and fluctuation in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall,flooding,irrigation, spring thaw,drainage,and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Building and construction estimates,specifications and planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. E3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Robert Peccia&Associates to use to design the proposed structure and prepare construction documents_ In the absence of our written approval,we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report The data,analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. a_ OCT- 16-01 09 : S9 FROM :ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:406 7S036 PACE 19/26 Robert Peccia&Associates • December 20,2000 Project 005256 Page 13 E.4. Level of Care Services performed by SK Geotechnical Corporation personnel for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this. area under similar budget and time restraints. No.warranty,expressed or•implied, is made. Professional Certification' I hereby certi is report was prepared by me -.Licensed Professional Engin a f .e State of Montana_ t T. '_ A., - 410 Principal; @ 'fcritgineer License Nunn i'M E December 20.-2000 • • c. OCT-16-01 09 : S6 FROM=ROB PECCIABASSOC . ID:4066SO36 PAGE 19/26 • SOILS BORING LOGS FOR FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CURRENTLY BEING COMPLETED ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE 10-26-01 Oct 19 01 02: 25p sk technicalbillings 406 2 3944 p. l Geotechnical -S It October 19,2001 Project 005256B Mr.Gary Swanson,PE Robert Peccia&Associates P.O.Box 5653 Helena,Montana 59620-5653 Dear Mr. Swanson: Re: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation,Proposed Buildings,Baxter Meadows Subdivision, Bozeman,Montana The preliminary geotechnical evaluation for the buildings within the Baxter Meadows Subdivision has been completed. The purpose of the preliminary geotechnical evaluation was to evaluate subsurface soil and groundwater conditions related to general design and construction of proposed buildings. The work was performed in general accordance with our Proposal P-1083b to you dated August 24,2001,which you authorized on September 6,2001. Field Procedures A total of 37 soil borings have been performed on the three one-quarter sections of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision. The locations of these borings are shown on the attached sketch. Penetration test borings are designated by the prefix"ST." The planned locations of borings ST-13,ST-16, ST-22, ST-26, ST-27, ST-28,ST-34 and ST-36 were not accessible to our truck-mounted drill rig or underground utilities were present. We therefore offset the locations from the staked locations. The locations we drilled were designated with a"A"suffix, i.e.,ST-13A. Borings ST-1 through ST-3 were performed on November 9 and 10,2001,as part of a preliminary geotechnical evaluation for a water treatment system within the subdivision. Borings ST-4 through ST-37 were performed between September 18 and 25,2001. The borings were performed with a Mobile B-61 truck-mounted core and auger drill. Sampling for the borings was conducted in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials(ASTM)D 1586,"Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." A manual 140-pound hammer was used to perform the penetration tests. The blows for the last foot of penetration were recorded on the logs and are an index of soil strength characteristics. Groundwater was encountered in most of the borings,and the results are indicated on the attached logs. The period of observation was relatively short,and several days may be needed for groundwater to stabilize in a boring performed in clay soils. Numerous monitoring wells have already been installed on the site by others. Data related to groundwater fluctuations at these monitoring wells can be obtained from Robert Peccia&Associates. 2611 Gabel Road.P.O.Box 80190,Billings,iNTontana 59108-0190 Phone:(406)652.3930, Fax:(406)652-3944 603 Nikles Drive.P.O.Box 5005,Bozeman.Montana 5971.5-5005 Phone:(406)SSS-3411; Fa.:(406)585-5355 1911 Meadowlark lane,P.O.Box 3026.Butte.Montana 59702-3026 Phone;(406)494-1676; Far:(406)494-1678 Oct 19 01 02: 26p skrPotechnicalbillings 406 2 3944 p. 2 Robert Peccia&Associates,Inc. October 19,2001 • Project 005256B Page 2 Results Logs. Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata,the penetration resistances and groundwater level information are attached. It should be noted the depths shown as boundaries between the strata are only approximate. The actual changes may be transitions,and the depths of changes vary between borings. Site Conditions. Bozeman and Baxter Meadows Subdivision are situated in alluvial fan deposits emanating from the mountains to the south. Alluvial fan deposits are created by streams originating from the mountains and meandering northward into the Bozeman Valley. The streams create channels and alluvial gravel deposits. The streams create dips and swales along their courses,which eventually filled in with clays. This process has created quite variable thicknesses of the clay overburden over relatively short distances. Soils. The general soil profile encountered at the borings was l to 4 feet of organic clay topsoil underlain by alluvial clays over alluvial gravels. Groundwater was encountered in most of the borings at depths ranging from about 2 to 9 feet. The topsoil thickness,depth to gravel and groundwater,as well as the corresponding elevations are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Summary of Topsoil,Gravel and Groundwater Topsoil To of Gravel Groundwater Boring Surface Elevation Thickness Depth Elevation* Depth Elevation; ST-1 4691.9 1 UT 1 1/2* 46901/2 4' 4688 ST-2 4688.2 1' 3' 4685 3' 4685 ST-3 4684.2 112' 51/2' 46781/2 4' 4680 STA 4673.6 1' 61/2' 4667 7' 46661/2 ST-5 4690.5 NE 13 1/2' 4677 NE-15' NE ST-6 4672.3 4' 6' 46661/2 4' 46681/2 ST-7 4697.1 1' NE-10' NE NE- 10' NE ST-8 4693.6 1 1/2' NE-10' NE 8' 4685 1/2 ST-9 4686.5 112' 4' 46821/2 7' 46791/2 ST-10 4697.3 NE 6 1/2' 4691 NE-10' NE ST-11 4696.3 NE 31/2' 4693 7' 46891/2 ST-12 4671.1 3' 7' 4664 6' 4665 ST-13A 4668.9 21/2' 61/2' 46621/2 T 4667 ST 14 4670.2 1' 7 112' 4662 1/2 4 1/2' 4665112 ST-15 4675.4 3112' 61/2' 4669 612' 4669 ST-16A 4680.2 312' NE-10' NE 31/2' 46761/2 Saturated ST-17 4680.9 11/2' 61/2' 46741/2 91/2' 46711/2 ST-18 4681.1 11/2' 612' 46741/2 6' 4675 ST-19 4683.6 2 1/2' 6 12' 4677 4' 4679 1/2 ST-20 4694.0 4' 6' 4678 6' 4678 ST 21 4686.3 l 12' 6' 4680 1/2 8 1/2' 4678 ST-22A 4689.8 4' 7' 4693 71/2' 46821/2 Oct 19 01 02: 2Gp sk technicalbillings 40G IW 3944 p. 3 Robert Peccia&Associates,Inc. October 19,2001 • Project 005256B Page 3 Topsoil Top of Gravel Groundwater Boring Surface Elevation Thickness Depth Elevation* Depth Elevation* ST-23 4692.5 1' 6ItT 4686 91/2' 4683 ST-24 4695.7 11/2' 81/2' 4687 8' 46871/2 ST-25 4695.4 1/2' 2' 46931/2 4' 46911/2 ST-26A 4698.7 1' 81/T 4690 111IIT 4687 ST-27A 4698.7 21/2' 7' 46911/2 41/2' 4694 ST 28A. 4704.0 NE 6 IIT 4697 112 4' 4700 ST-29 4702.0 21/2' 21/2' 4699112 3' 4699 ST 30 4707.4 1 1/2' 1 IIT 4706 5 1/2' 4702 ST-31 4718.1 11/2' 6' 4712 81/2' 47091/2 ST-32 4717.2 11/2' 3' 4714 9' 4708 ST-33 4710.5 11/2' 3' 47071/2 5' 47051/2 ST-34A 4729.6 1' 6lIT 4723 41/T 4725 ST-35 4729.0 1' T 4727 51/2' 472.31/2 ST 36A 4732.2 1 1/2, 2 1/T 4729 1/2 7 1/T 4724 112 ST-37 4736.4 Is 6' 4730112 NE-10' NE *Elevations rounded to the nearest 1/2 foot. NE=Not Encountered NE-10'=Not encountered to a depth of 10'. Penetration tests in the alluvial clays were directly related to their relative moisture content. Lower penetration resistances were encountered in the wet clays,generally ranging from weight-of-hammer to about 4 blows per foot(BPF). These values indicated the wet clays were very soft to rather soft. On the other hand,rather dry to moist alluvial clays were encountered in many of the borings. In these borings, the penetration resistances were generally higher and ranged from about 5 to 12 BPF,indicating they were rather soft to rather stiff. Penetration resistances in the undcrlying alluvial gravels typically ranged from 25 BPF to 50 blows for 3 inches of penetration. These values indicated the underlying gravels were medium dense to very dense, but were mostly very dense. As can be seen in Table 1, groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from about 2 to 9 feet, although groundwater was not encountered in four of the borings. The groundwater table was generally at or slightly below the top of the alluvial gravels. In some of the borings,however,groundwater was present in the organic and/or alluvial clays above the gravel. Proposed Construction Building design and layout within various portions of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision is in preliminary stages. At this time, it is anticipated the buildings will likely be one to two stories with earth-supported concrete floors at or slightly above existing grades. Most of the buildings will be residential or condominium units,although some commercial buildings, such as a veterinarian clinic,are also planned. The buildings will likely be constructed of wood framing. Some of the buildings may have crawl-space floor systems. Oct 19 01 02: 26p skistechnicalbillings 406 2 3944 p. 4 Robert Peccia&Associates,Inc- October 19,2001 • Project 005256B Page 4 The actual building layouts,foundation configurations and building loads are not known at this time. For the purpose of this preliminary report,we anticipate most of the planned buildings will be lightly-loaded structures. For lightly-loaded structures,we have assumed wall loads will be less than 2 kips per linear foot,column loads will be less than 30 kips,distributed floor loads will be less than 250 pounds per square foot(psf), and concentrated floor loads will be less than 1,000 pounds. Moderate-to heavy-loaded structures will have loads that exceed these values. Preliminary Analysis and Recommendations Foundations. Based on the results of the soil borings,it is our opinion the buildings can be supported on shallow-spread footings. As previously indicated,some of the borings encountered rather soft to rather stiff alluvial clays that can be used for direct support of proposed spread footings. On the other hand, some of the borings encountered wet and soft alluvial clays. These wet,soft alluvial clays are extremely moisture sensitive,and will become more disturbed during excavation. They will be too soft to provide a suitable platform for footing construction and some additional subgrade preparation is needed. Table 2 below summarizes the anticipated footing conditions encountered at each of the borings performed throughout the site. We assumed the footings will bear at a depth of about 4 feet below existing grade, indicating the floor would likely match existing.grades. On some sites,however,grades beneath the floor may be raised and the footings will actually be shallower than indicated in the table. Table 2. Anticipated Footing Conditions and Preparation for Light Buildings _Borkng Footing Sub rade at a Depth of 4' Footing Su ort GroundwaterlDewaterin ST-1 Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravels Yes ST-2 Densc Gravels Undisturbed Gravels Yes ST-3 Medium to Stiff Clays Undisturbed Cla Yes ST-4 Rather Soft Clays Undisturbed Clays No. ST-5 Soft to Rather Stiff Clays Undisturbed Clays No ST-6 Soft and Wet Ciays Subexcavate/Backfill Yes ST-7 Medium Clays Undisturbed Clays No ST-8 Medium Clays Undisturbed Clays No ST-9 Rather Soft ClaysfDense Gravels Subexcavate/Backfill No ST-10 Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backfill Maybe ST-1 I Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravels No ST-12 Soft Clays SubexcavateJBackfill Yes ST-13A Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backfill Yes ST-14 Rather Soft Clays Undisturbed Clan Maybe ST 15 Rather Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backfill Yes ST-16A Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backfill Maybe ST-17 Medium Clay Undisturbed Clays No ST-1 S Soft clays Subexcavate/Backfill Yes ST-19 Soft CNYS Subexcavate/Backfrll Yes ST-20 Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backfrll Yes Oct 19 01 02: 29p sk6technicalbillings 406 2 3944 p. 5 Robert Peccia&Associates,Inc. October 19,2001 Project 005256E Page 5 Baring Footing Sub grade at a Depth of 4' Footing Support Groundwater/Dewaterin ST-21 Rather Soft Cla j Undisturbed Clays No ST-22A Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backfill Maybe ST-23 Soft clan Subexcavate/Backfill No ST-24 Soft Clays SubexcavatdBackfill No ST-25 Dense Gravel Undisturbed Gravel Yes ST-26A Soft Clays SubexcavateBackfrll No ST-27A Soft Clays SubexcavateBackfill. Yes ST-28A Soft Clays 'SubexcavateBackfill Yes ST-29 Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravel Yes ST-30 Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravel' Maybe ST-31 Soft Clays Subexcavate/Backf ll No ST-32 Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravel No ST-33 Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravel Maybe ST-34A soft clays Subexcavate/Backfill Yes ST-35 Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravel Maybe ST 36A Dense Gravels Undisturbed Gravel No ST-37 Stiff Cla s Undisturbed Cla No As can be seen in the table above,we anticipate three footing conditions will be encountered for lightly- loaded buildings constructed over the site. These footing conditions are described below. Condition 1. Undisturbed Gravels. Ten of the 37 borings encountered alluvial gravels at depths of 4 feet or less. It is our opinion the alluvial gravels are suitable for direct support of proposed footings. On some of these sites,however,groundwater was encountered above the gravel and will be encountered in frost-depth footings trenches. Dewatering will therefore likely be required to lower the groundwater level during construction to allow for footing and foundation wall construction(see Borings ST-1 and ST-2). Condition 2. Undisturbed Clays. Nine of the 37 borings encountered rather soft to rather stiff alluvial clays that were considered a suitable subgrade for direct support of footings. Extreme care needs to be taken during construction in these areas to avoid disturbing the clay subgrade. rooting ° trenches should be excavated with a tracked backhoe working from the surface with a smooth-bladed bucket. Footings can then be supported directly on the undisturbed native clays. Similar to above, groundwater will likely be encountered during footing excavation on some of these sites(see Borings ST-3 and ST-14). If encountered,dewatering will be needed during construction. Condition 3. Subexcavate—Backfill. Eighteen of the 37 borings encountered wet,soft alluvial clays,which are unsuitable for footing support. On most of these sites,groundwater was also encountered in the alluvial clays,which contributed to their low strengths. It is our opinion subexcavation and backfilling with imported sandy gravel will be needed to improve the footing subgrade. Dewatering will be needed on most of these sites. Oct 19 01 02: 30p skgeotechnicalbilli rig"s 40 52 3944 p. 6 Robert Peccia&Associates,Inc. October 19,2001 Proicct 005256B Page 6 Subexcavate—Backfill. The borings indicated development over about one-half of the proposed subdivision will require subgrade improvement. Subexcavating and backfilling on these sites(Condition 3)will provide a suitable platform during construction and reduce settlement. We recommend subexcavating the alluvial clays from beneath the proposed footings down to the alluvial gravels,or to a depth of 2 feet,whichever is less. When the subexcavations beneath footings encounter native gravels,it is our opinion imported sandy gravel backfill can be placed directly on the native gravels up to bottom-of- footing level. Some of the borings,however,indicated the soft alluvial clays extended 3 feet or more below proposed bottom-of-footing level. On these sites,we recommend subexcavating 2 feet beneath proposed footings,and then placing a medium survivability woven geotextile fabric on the resulting subgrade and 2 feet up the sides prior to placing backfill. Subexcavations beneath proposed footings should extend 1 foot(horizontal)beyond the outside footing edges. We recommend using 3-inch minus sandy gravel as backfill beneath the proposed footings,which is readily available from several gravel suppliers in the Bozeman area. Backfill beneath proposed footings should be placed in lifts not exceeding 12 inches uncompacted thickness,and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM Method of Test D 698 (standard Proctor). Bearing Pressure. The borings indicate spread footings bearing on the native gravels can be designed for net allowable bearing pressures ranging from 3,000 to 5,000 psf. Footings bearing on the alluvial clays or compacted backfill placed over the alluvial clays can be designed for a bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. We anticipate total and differential settlement of lightly-loaded structures bearing on spread footings as described above will not exceed 3/4 inch. Wood-frame buildings can generally tolerate movements of his magnitude. Floor Slabs. It is our opinion earth-supported floor slabs can be supported directly on the alluvial clays or compacted backfill placed over the alluvial clays aftcr the organic clay topsoil has been removed. A few of the borings,however,indicated groundwater levels in the organic clays above the alluvial clays (see Borings ST-6 and ST-13A). At these locations,dewatering will likely be necessary during removal of the organic clay topsoil and placement of fill to raise grades beneath the floor slab. Similar to the footings,we recommend a medium survivability woven geotextile fabric be placed directly on the clay subgrade to assist in stabilization of the underlying soft soils. We then recommend using 3-inch sandy gravel as fill to raise grades beneath the floor slabs. A leveling course of 6 inches of 3/4-inch minus crushed gravel road base could be placed on the sandy gravel fill for the concrete. Placement of significant fills on the alluvial clays will.result in clay consolidation and excessive floor settlement. It is our opinion up to 3 feet of fill can be placed beneath proposed floor slabs without excessive settlement. If more than 3 feet of fill is needed,we recommend subexcavating the alluvial clays from.beneath floor slabs(and foundations)down to the alluvial gravels,then replacing these soils with compacted backfill up to the desired grades. Placing gravel fill over the native gravels will provide a more suitable platform during construction and significantly reduce the amount of total and differential settlement. Additional Geotechnical Evaluation The borings for the preliminary geotechnical evaluation were generally spaced 800 to 1,200 feet apart across the three one-quarter sections. Soil and groundwater conditions will change between the borings. Oct 19 01 02: 32p skg echnicalbillings 406 ff 3944 p. 7 Robert Peccia&Associates,Inc. October 19,2001 Project 00525613 Page 7 We therefore recommend performing additional geotechnical evaluation once building locations and loads are better known. Additional geotechnical evaluation will include soil borings performed 100 to 200 feet apart to more accurately evaluate subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. Based on the conditions encountered,more detailed recommendations related to foundation and floor subgrade preparation can be provided. General The preliminary analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from our soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Groundwater observations in the borings were made at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. These data were interpreted in the text of this preliminary report. The period of observation was relatively short,and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur. We have appreciated the opportunity to provide these services. If you have any questions,please contact US. Sincerely, Professional Certification I hereby c at this report was prepared by m hdt71 duly Licensed Professional En er f the State of Montana. ST ;engineer Lice tt�4i �����'� , itut�ta Cory G.Rice,PE Reviewing Engineer gts/cgr-khr Attachments: Boring Location Sketch Descriptive Terminology Log of Boring Sheets ST-1 through ST-37 OCT- 16-01 09 : S9 FROM:ROHERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID :406fS036 PACE 20/26 Geotecocal S u, Letter of Transmittal To: Mr.Gary Swanson' Date: October 15,2001 Robert Peccia&Associates Project: 015256A P.O.Box 5653 Helena,Montana 59604 From: Gregory T. Stafflleno,PE Re: Baxter Meadows Subdivision Remarks: Here are the preliminary Log of Boring sheets for-your review/use. Laboratory tests are started. Please call if you have any questions. b RECEIV OCT 16 Z001 ROBERT PECCfA A AWC ':ATES • 2611 Gabel Road,P.O.Box 80190,Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone:(406)652-3930;Fax:(406)652-3944 603 Nikles Drive,PA.Box 5005,Bozeman,Montana 59715-5005 Phone:(406)585-3411;Fax:(406)585-5855 1911 Meadowlark Lane,P.O.Box 3026,Butte,Monrana.59702-3026 Phone:(406)494-1675;Fax:(406)494-1678 OCT-16-01 OS : SS FR OM:ROSE6 PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064 75036 PAGE 21/26 r s � � E `• 1 s E t- pt7 F- o G 0 0 l t rig nw AcM �$ A C 14 Z ci a 21 f� ` � a Z NZ, x� ax st v • a WATER S 3TEM BAXTER MEADOMfS t r Lrs� _ FLAK / —= OCT-16-01 OS : SS FROM:ROHERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 22/26 v n_ 2611 Gabel RQP.O.Box so I90 P c'�cL1 M 1 NA� LOG OF BORING Billings, ana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 0052-56A BORING: ST-4 GEOTECIMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 I/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/0I SCALE: 1"=3' EIev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0. OL I I ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark 1.0 brown,rather dry,rather stiff.(Topsoil) . LEAN CLAY, low plasticity,some Sand,trace —— I I roots,olive brown,rather dry,medium. (Alluvium) CL 6 3.5 _ _ _ LEAN CLAY,low plast city,some coarse Sand, trace roots,light olive brown,moist,rather soft_ CL (Alluvium) ' s 6.5 _ __ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,brown,waterbearing,medium An open triangle in the dense to very dense. (Alluvium) 28 water level(VrL) column indicates the GP depth at which • groundwater was first + observed while . drilling. 10.5 � � - � END OF BORING Water down 7'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed immediately after withdrawal of auger. a 0 0 z cz� 3 • o a 0 005256A ST-4 Me I of 1 OCT-16-01 09 = 59 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 23/26 'i01K PrIELiMINAO 261 I Gabel „I d,P.o'Box 80190 LOG O F BORING Billings, ontana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROTECT: 005256A BORING: $T-5 GEOTECHM(_AL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design Center of westbound lane,see attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer ME AODr 3-1/41 HSA,Manual DATE: 9l24/OI SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 FILL: 15"of Sandy Gravel surfacing. _ _ Bag samplc from I to ; FELL-: Leao Clay,low to medium plasticity,trace 4', Sand,dark brown,moist,rather stiff- 9 3.5 LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,light olive brown,moist,soft to rather stiff. (Alluvium) gp=pocket 3 112 penctrometer estimate of unconfined compressive strEngth, tons per squarc foot. 6 I CL ` 7 1 -trace humus at 12 1/2': 12 1 12 13.5 _ _ __ POORLY GRADED GRAVLE with SAND and GP SILT,fine-to medium-grained,brown,moist, GM medium dense. (Alluvium) 29 15.5 END OF BORING Water not observed with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-M depth of 8.5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. a m d Q 005256A ST-5 page i of I OCT- 16-01 10: 00 FROM :ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID :406447SO36 PAGE 24/26 r _ 2611 Gabel P_O.Box 80190 P E LN I NA* L O G OF B O R I N G Billings, tans 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-6 • GEOTECMNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DREU.ED BY: S.Shafer METHOD 3 1/4'HSA,Msausl DATE: 9/20/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 I ORGANIC CLAY,.low to medium plasticity,some roots,disturbed to 1 1/2';brownish black,rather moist to moist,rather soft to rather stiff- (Topsoil) a ' II OL II II 9 Il II TW 4.0 1111 _ __ g LEAN CLAY with SAND, low plasticity,trace Gravel,olive brown,wet/waterbearing,rather soft. CL (Alluvium) s so 6.0 _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,dark brown and black, waterbearing,dense. (Alluvium) a1 GP GM 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 4'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down 4'immediately after withdrawal of auger. a z 5 a t C 005256A S .4 page 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 00 FROM=ROSERT PECCIA&AS'SOC . IDt4064475036 PAGE 25/26 v 2611 Gabel I P.O.Box 80190 D R�- "rl 1 M&I Billings, ontana 59108-0 l 90 LOG OF BORING Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-7 GEOTECffiVICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana - - DRIL LED BY: S.Shafcr METHOD: 3 1/4-HS4,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: I"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Ramarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,rown,. OL b rather i.0 _ _ dry,medium. (Topsoil) LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace roots,light olive 2 0 CL brown,rather dry,medium. (Alluvium) SANDY LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace roots, Iighi olive brown,rather dry,mediurn. (Alluvium) 6 CL s 6.5 ___ SILTY SAND,very fine-to medium-grained, nonplastic,weakly cemented,trace roots,light SM brown,rather dry,medium dense. (alluvium) ra 8.5 _ SANDY L9CN CLEA.Y,low p—lasticity,light olive CL brown,rather dry,very stiff. (Alluvium) 17 I0.5 [END OF BORING Water not observed with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 5.5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. a a z g i �q2 d a aif OCT-18-01 10 : 00 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 26/26 2611 Gabel P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings, ontana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 ,• PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-H GEOTECEENICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision ' - Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: 1"_ Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp 11,,_ ks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,medium plasticity,some roots; OL dark olive brown,rather dry,soft. (Topsoil) 3 1.$ __ _ __ ______ LEAN CLAY,low to medium plasticity,trace roots and humus,light olive brown,moist,lather stiff. CL (Alluvium) 9 4.0 LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,trace humus,light olive brown,moist to vet,medium to soft. (Alluvium) CL 3 1/2 8.5 - LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,Iight olive brown,wet, • CL very soft. (AIluvium) - 10.5 t o END OF BORING Water not observed with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 6' immediately after withdrawal of auger. o. n z z 5 • • a v q e n O 005256A ST-3 past I of 1 OCT- 16-01 10 : 17 FROM:ROHERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:�4�06447SO36 PACE 2/30 2611 Gabel R .O.Box 80190 LOG O F BORING 0 Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 . PROJECT: 005256A BORING: $T-9 GEOTEC$MCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19101 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL I qp Remarks 00 ORGANIC CLAY,Iow plasticity,some roots,trace OL i i Sand,dark brown,moist,medium. (Topsoil) 1_5 z LEAN CL.A_'�,lo'OG plasfic ,trace humus,some Sand,light olive brown,moist,rather soft. CL (Alluvium) S 1 4.0 Tw _ —_ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,brown,moist to waterbearing, dense to very dense. (Alluvium) 42 GP + 40 waterbearing. - sz 8.5 SILTY GRAVEL with SAND,fine-to------ o------ coarse-grained,brown,waterbearing,medium dense. GM (Alluvium) 21 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 9'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 6 immediately-after withdrawal of auger. Waterbearing soils o_iserved at a depth of about 7' while drilling. a z 0 g 'a 9 e a ♦. a W5256A ST-9 page I of I OCT-16-01 10: 16 FROM:ROSERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PACE 3/30 2611 Gabel Ro .0.Box 80.190 = + ,- -�...• A`� L O G' O F, B O R I N G Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930; Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A. BORING: $T-10 GEOTECIMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design. 8'S of centerline,see attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/24/01 SCALE. I"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Ranarks 0.3 FILL: 4" of -- t Asphalt Pavement. ——————_ GravQlly Lean Clay with Sand,brown,moist, stiff. - t3 Bag sample from 1'to 2.0 `;' LEAN CLAY,medium plasticity,trace Gravel,olive brown,moist,medium, (Alluvium) s CL 4.0 _ LEAN CLAY,medium plasticity,olive brown,wet, soh. (Alluvium) 3 0 CL s POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine to coarse-grained,brown,moist,very dense to medium dense. (Alluvium) s3 • GP • s za 10.5 END OF BORING Water not observed with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground- Water not observed tQ dry cave-in depth of 6' immediately after withdrawal of auger. a o , V g Z i • a ' O 4 t. a C 005256A ST-10 pagc 1 of 1 ti OCT-16-01 10 : 16 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 4/30 34W __ _9 . ....—--.I.;, %." .-jv 2611 Gabel RoWP.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (4 652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROTECT: 005256A BORING: ST-11 GEOTECM41CAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design. See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRTt i ED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 9/24/01 SCALE. 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 0.4 3 12"of Asphalt Pavement FILL: San y Gravel-base,fine-to coarse-grained, trace Clay,dark brown,moist,medium dense. zg I�I: Lean Clay,medium plasticity,trace Sand, — — ��,� dark brown,moist,rather stiff. 3.5 .� POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,trace Silt and Cobbles,gray, rather moist to waterhearing at T,very dense. (Alluvium) 53 GP . SL so GP POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and 9.3, GM SILT,fine-to coarse-grained, some Cobbles,brown, so for A sec waterbearin .—very—dense.—( Alluvium END OF BORING Water down 82'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 5 1/2' immediately aftei vvtthdrawal of auger. Waterbearing soils observed at a depth of about 7' while drilling. r. S a 0 0 0 z z 4 a. o a a 005256A ST-I I page I of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 18 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID :�406447SO36 PAGE S/30 2611 Gabel R P.O.Box 80190 : : :_= L O G O F B O R i N G Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A BORING: $T-12 GEOTECFLNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 3'S of staked location,see attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 114"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Rcn=rks 0.0 1 1 ORGANIC LA-Y,4ow-plasticity,some roots, 1 1 brownish black,lather moist. (Topsoil) s OL II II 11 3 3.0 _ LEAN CLAY with SAND,medium plasticity,race Saturated below 3'. humus,gray,wet,soft. (Alluvium) CL 3 3/4 6.0 _._ _ _ SL SM SII. SAND,findgrained,nonplastic,dark browaa7 7.0 waterbearing. (Alluvium)- ---------------------- POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and GP SILT,fine-to medium-grained,dark gray, 8.5 GM waterbearing,medium dense to dense. (Alluvium) _ _ _ — • CLAA —Y GRAVIfL with SAND,Tow plasticity, fine-to medium-grained,waterbearing,medium GC dense. (Alluvium) 23 11.0 _ __ POORLY ORADEQ GRAVEL with SAND and—— SILT,fine-to medium-grained,trace humus,dark brown,waterbearing,medium dense to dense. (Alluvium) 20 • GP ' GM 15.5 -trace Clay at 15'. 36 END OF BORLNG Water down 6 with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down T immediately after withdrawal of auger. a o z 4 a a 005256A ST-12 page 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 19 FROM:ROHERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 6/30 2611 Gabel Ro o.sox 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: 406) 652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: S7-13A GEOTECEMICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design IS'S of staked location,see attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,b4anual DATE 9/20/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Ratnarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low to medium plasticity,some mots,black,rather dry to moist,medium to rather OL I soft. (Topsoil) Possible artesian II SL groundwater conditions. 2.5 LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity, —trace - 2/1 t2 Saturated below 2 1/2'. CL humus and roots,grayish brown,soft (Alluvium) rw 4.0 _ __ SILTY CLAY with SAND,slightly plastic,trace humus,gray,waterbearing,soft. (Alluvium) CL 3 1/4 ML 6.5 _ POORLY G�t.ADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,dark brown,waterbearing, GP medium dense. (Alluvium) 26 8.5 __ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,trace Cobbles,dark brown,waterbearing,dense to very dense. (Alluvium) 45 GP GM -some Clay at 12 1/2'. 45 14.9 sas END OF BORING Water down 2'•with'14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground_ Water down 3.5'immediately after withdrawal of auger. a . F o d o - 4 H o IL 0 005256A ST-13A page 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 19 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 7/30• 261.1 Gabel AR P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256X BORING:. ST-14 GEOTECEMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 99'S and 38'W of ST-12,see attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRML.ED BY: S..Shafer_ METHOD: 3 1/4-HSA,Manual DATE: 9/20/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Deuaiption of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,dark brown, 1.0 OL rather dry.stiff (Topsoil) _ LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,trace salts,light olive brown,rather dry,stiff to rather CL stiff. (Alluvium) 9 3.5 ——_ low LEAN CLAY,lo plasticity,olive brown, moist to rather wet to waterbearing below 4 1/2', rather soft (Alluvium) s I CL -some Gravel below T. .7.5 —— vlo 1/2 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,trace Cobbles,dark • GP brown,waterbearing,medium dense to very dense. GM (Alluvium) 10.5 69 END OF BORING Water-down 6.2'with 9'of hollow-gem auger in the ground Water down 4.5'immediately after withdrawal of auger. S a • c 0 • 9 N N 1 � . ;� 005256A ST-14 page 1 of 1 OCT-18-01 10 : 19 FROM:ROBERT 'PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 8/30 2611 Gabel R P.O.Box 80190 717) ' 0 LOG O F BORING Billinzs,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-15 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 275'E and 150N of ST-12,see attached Baxter Meadows Subdivision sketch. Bozeman,Montana DR LLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD- 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: SCALE: 1"=3' Elev- Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark I brown,rather dry to moist,medium to rather soft (Topsoil) 5 Il OL II II 3 II 3-5 I I __ LEAN CLAY,low to medium plasticity,trace roou, olive brown mottled to greenish gray,wet,rather soft. (Alluvium) CL 5 1/2 6.5 _ SL i POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fins- 40 to coarse-grained,brown,waterbearing,dense to very dense.(Alluvium) a' GP 76 10.5 END OF BORING a c� s 'a q 4 a c a ODS256A ST-I S pape 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 1S FROM :ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID :406447SO36 PACE S/30 2611 Gabel lico.O.Box 80190 LOG O F BORING Balings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A BORING: STA 6A GEOTECBIVICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility,Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S_Shafer I METHOD:-3 /4'HSA,Manual DATE: 925/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ,;;ij FILL: 12"of Sandy Gravel surfacing. 1.0 I ORGANIC CLAY, low plasticity,black,wet,rather Bag sample from 1'to 1 I Soft_ (Topsoil) 4% OL II a li 3.5 _ ______ _ LEAN CLAY,low to medium plasticity,trace Sand, dark gray,wet,soft. (Alluvium) CL - _ 3 12 6.0 LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,gray,wet, soft to rather soft. (Alluvium) 3 12 CL ' a t/a • 10.5 END OF BORING Water not observed with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 3.4' immediately after withdrawal of auger. S a o S • 4 a O 005256A ST-16A page 1 of 1 OCT-18-01 10: 20 FROM:ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:4064475036 PACE 10/30 2611 Gabel RV P.O.Box 80190 - LOG O F BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: STA 7 GEOTECEMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana .. DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark OL i i brown,rather dry,rather soft. (Topsoil) a 1:5 LEAN CLAY,Iow to medium plasticity,trace roots, olive Brown,rather dry,medium. (Alluvium) 6 CL i 8 , 6.5 _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine` to coarse-grained,brown,moist to waterbearing at 9 1/2',dense. (Alluvium) 32 GP • � b, 10.5 49 END OF BORING Water down 9.5'with T of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. S • S r. 5 0 e IL ' a 005256A ST-17 pao 1 of 1 OCT- 18-01 10 : 20 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:40E447S036 PAGE 11/30 2611 Gabel R O.Box 80190 Billings, ontana 5910"190 LOG O F BORING Phone: (406) 652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROTECT: 005256A BORING: $T-9 8 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana ' DRJLLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: V=3' Elev. Depth. Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC'CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark OL i brown,rather dry,rather soft. (Topsoil) 5 1.5 LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace humus and roots, dark olive brown,rather moist,medium.•(Alluvium) CL 7 3.5 ------- -------------- LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace humus and Gravel,light olive brown,wet to waterbearing at 6', soft. (Alluvium) CL - z is POORLY GRADED$ARIA with CLAW and SP GRAVEL.,fine-to coarse-grained,slightly plastic, - SC brown,waterbearing,very dense. (Alluvium) 8.0 _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fore- • to coarse-gr$inedfbwwn,waterbearing,very dense. GP (Alluvium) S9 10.5 END OF BORING Water down T with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the mound. Water down 6'immediately after withdrawal of auger. a O d 2 Z O S 0 4 �o e a O 005256A ST-18 page 1 of 1 OCT-1I3-01 10 - 20 FROM,ROSERT PECCIASASSOC . ID=406447SO36 PAGE 12/30 2611 Gabel WP.O.Box 80190 L O G OF BORING Billings,Montana 5910"190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-19. GEOTECBNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 9/20/01 SCALE: 1"=T Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WI-1 qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,Iow plasticity,some roots,dark brownish black,rather dry to moist,medium to OL rather soft (Topsoil) 11 2.5 10111 _ LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plastici _ty,trace roots,dark olive brown to light olive brown,moist to waterbearing at 4%rather soft. (Alluvium) SZ CL a 1 r2 6.5 _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,dark brown, 50 waterbearing,dense. (Alluvium) GP GM - n 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 4.5'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down 4'immediately after withdrawal of auger. 0 5 ' a 0 • 4 fo a d 005256A ST-19 page 1 of I OCT-16-01 10: 20 FROM.ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . I13:406447SO36 PAGE 13/30 2611 Gabel P.o.Box 80190 . LOG O F BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-20 GE0TECH14ICAL.EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design - _ See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafcr METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE 920/01 SCALE: 1"=T EIev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark I I brown,rather dry to moist,rather soft. (Topsoil) S Bag sample from 1'to I I 4. OL II II II . 4.0 I I LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,light olive brown,wet, CL very soft- (Alluvium) WWI 6.0 _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with S.�ND,fine- to coarse-grained,brown,waterbaering,dense. (Alluvium) 40 GP a 33 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 6'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down 6'immediately after withdrawal of auger. a o ' I3 2 n 005256A "ST-20 pao 1 of 1 OCT-19-01 10 : 21 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 14/30 �i 2611 Gabel R .O.Box 80190 - �' ' L O G OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-21 GEOTECEMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 I/4-HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: V=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,trace roots,dark OL : : brown,rather moist,rather soft. (Topsoil) IS 5 LEAN CLAY with SAND,low pGs_Ec_ity,,tia—ce-- roots,dark olive brown,rather moist,rather soft. CL (Alluvium) 5 3.5 _ SANDY LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,light olive brown,moist,rather stiff. (Alluvium) CL II 6.0 -trace Gravel below 5 1/2'. POORLY GRADED GRAVEL withSAND and SILT,fide-to coarse-grained,trace Cobbles,brown, moist to waterbearing at 8 1/2',dense to very dense. GP (Alluvium) - 34 GM 52 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 8.5'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 3' immediately after withdrawal of auger. fl a_ S a a 005256A ST-21 page-1 of I OCT-IS-01 10 : 21 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PACE iSZ30 2611 Gabel P.o.Box go190 LOG OF BORING Billings, mans 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A _ _ BORING: $T-2M GEOTECE MCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 297E of staked location,see attached sketch_ Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRD-LED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4-HSA,Manual DATE: 9/25/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 FILL: Silty Gravel with Sand,fine-to coarse-grained,slightly plasmic,some Cobbles and 1.5 ;�;� Boulders,brown,rather dry. t ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark t bro—wn,moist to wet,rather soft. (Buried Topsoil) s o OL t 4.0 LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,olive brown,wet,soft (Alluvium) 2 o CL 7.0 SILTY GRAVEL with SAND,,fide-t0_ —— ——— 42 Q coarse-grained,nonplastic,brown,waterbearing, dense to medium dense. (Alluvium) GM 1s 32 13.5 _ CLAYEY GRAV with SAND,fine-to GC coarse-grai EL ned,low plasticity,broad,waterbearing, medium dense. (AlluNzum) 24 15-5 END OF BORING Water down 9.4'with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down 7.3'immediately after withdrawal of auger. a F O O 2 S • 5 OD52%A ST-22A page 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 21 FROM:ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 16/30 2611 Gabel R P.O.Box 80190 - LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-23 GEOTECBNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,bfanual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 OL i ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark 1.0 brown,rather dry,rattler stiff. (Topsoil) L AN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,trace — — Si4 roots and pinholes,dark olive brown to light olive CL brown,rather dry to moist,rather soft. (Alluvium) s 3.5 _ _ _ _ Tw SANDY LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,race roots and humus,olive brown,wet,very soft. (Alluvium) CL 1 6.5 _ s POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- • to come-grained,trace Silt,dark brown,moist to S waterbearing at 9 1/2',medium dense to dense. 14 • (Alluvium) GP • -more Silt at 9 1/2'. - 39 10.5 • END OF BORING Waterbearing soils observed at a depth of about 9 1/2'while drilling. e a a 0 n m z ' c� g 9 a 6 005256A ST-23 page I of 1 OCT-18-01 10 , 21 FROM:ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID :406447S036 PACE 17/30 2611 Gabel' P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings, ontana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (40'6)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-24 • GEOTECEMCA.L EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual j DATE: SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL I qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark pL i brown,rather dry,rather stiff. (Topsoil) 10 1.5 __ LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,trace roots,olive brown,rather dry,very stiff (Alluvium)CL 19 3.5 —— Tw LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,olive brown,wet,sofR (Alluvium) 3 3/s CL — -trace Gravel at 7 1/2'. -waterbearing at 8'. 3 'a 8.5 __ • POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and GP __ CLAY,fine-to coarse-grained,non to slightly GC plastic,dark brown,waterbearing,dense. 10.5 (Alluvium) 39 END OF BORING Water down 8'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 6' irmnediately after withdrawal of auger. a. a o , 0 8 . z z S 4 c S . a O 0052S6A ST-24 pagc 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 22 FROM:ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 18/30 2611 Gabel a P.O.Boa 80190 = LOG O F BORING Billings,Montana`59108-0190 Phone: (4 652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 . PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-25 GEOTECKVICA L EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Msnual DAIS: 9/24/01 SCALE: 1"=3' EIev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 0.5 OL ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity;some roots,dark - brown,rather dryZrather soft._g2ps9D_——__ CL GRAVELLY LEAN CLAY with SAND,low u 2.0 plasticity,trace humus,roots,Cobbles and boulders, broln,rather der,very stiff.S.q}luvium)——__ _ CLAYEY GRAVEL with SAND,fine-toGC ad coarse-grained,low plasticity,trace roots,brown, 3.5 rather moist.denser CAAlluviJ__ POORLY DED Y GRA GRAVEL lff and SZ GP SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,brown, GM waterbearing,dense- (Alluvium) az CLA YY GRAVES,with SAND,fine-to - —— coarse-grained,Iow plasticity,brown,waterbearin, very dense to medium dense. (Alluvium) 54 2s GC so 50.3- 15.5 END OF BORING Water down 4'with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. - Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 4' immediately after withdrawal of auger. S _ ' a o n z z .. z 0 S • a' 0 a 0 005256A Sr-25 page 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 22 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447S036 PAGE 19/30 7611 Gabel P.0..Box 80�90 LOG O F B O R I N G Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: D052.56A BORING: $T-26A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 1ON of staked location,see attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY:. S.S6afer. METHOD: 3 I/4^HSA,Manual DATE: 9/19/01 SCALE: 1"=3' EIev. Depth. Symbol Description of Materials BPF WLJ qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low to medium plasticity,trace 1.0 OL 1 Sand,some roots,dark brown,rather dry,rather `ti$_ToP_Soil)L——— / 1 I 2 0 CL LEAN CLAY,medium plasticity,trace Sand and roots,olive brown,rather dry,rather stiff CL ��AlluvitanZ---- ------------ Z LEAN CLAY,medium plasticity,trace Sand,light 3.5 olive brown rather Ldry,soft.I Alluvium LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,olive brown,wet,soft. (Alluvium) 3 1R CL 1 3 0 85• POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,trace Silt,brown,moist to--------------------- waterbearing at 11 1/2',dense to very dense. " (Alluvium) 41 - i S GP WdM Im S ss • 15 � 56 - .5 END OF BARING Water down 11.5`with-14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground_ Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 9' immediately after withdrawal of auger. s 8 3 • S 'a v a 0 005256A ST-26A page 1 of 1 OCT-18-01 10 : 22 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID=4064475036 PAGE 20/30 2611 Gabel Ro .O.Box 80190 -.. L Q G Q F B Q R I N G Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-27A GEOT'EC13NYCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 10N of staked location,see attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 9/18/0l SCALE: i"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,black,moist, rather soft: (Topsoil) 4 OL 2.5 _____---_ __ __ _ LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace Sand,darks olive tin brown,wet to waterbearing at 4 1/2',very soft CL (Alluvium) - SZ 5.0 ——— 1/6 CLAYEY SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,low plasticity,pace Gravel,olive brown,waterbearing, SG medium dense. (Alluvium) 7.0 -----------=--------- SILTY GRAVEL with SAND,fine-to GM coarse-grained,dark brown,waterbearing,dense. 3s 8.5 (Alluvium) POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- ,., to coarse-grained,trace Silt,grayish brown, GP waterbearing,dense. (Alluvium) \41 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 5'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down 4.5'immediately after withdrawal of auger. d. g a z z z 0 5 a 0 4 S 2 c 0 005256A ST-27A loge 1 of 1 OCT-1 B-0 1 1 0 : 23 FROM=ROBERT PEt"C I P,&P1SS:OC - I D=406447 S03E PAGE 2 1/30 26.11.Gabel R9 P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 5910MI90 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: . ST-28A GE01ECUMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design 30N and 25'of staked Iocation,.see attached Baxter Meadows Subdivision sketch- Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY:. S.Shafer.- METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 1 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 FILL: 18"of Gravel surfacing,contains Cobbles and Boulders. Bag sample from 1'to Lean Clay with SAND,low plasticity,trace 4' �;;; Gravel,olive brown and dark brown,moist, 2.5 medium 3/4 LEAN CLAY with SAND,low plasticity,olive brown,wet to waterbearing at 4',medium to very soft (Alluvium)_- CL - 1 0 6.5 _ _ _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,trace Silt,grayish black, waterbearing,dense to very dense. (Alluvium0 d6 s GP -Cobbles below IV. 17/49 s • i S0-6' 13.5 • ___ _ __ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and GP CLAY;fine-to coarse-grained,low plasticity,dark GC brown,waterbearing,very dense. (AIIuvium) �_15 69 .5 - END OF BORING Water down I I'with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 6.8' immediately after withdrawal of auger. Waterbearing soils observed at a depth of about 4' while drilling. a a ' 0 n z 4 �o o0S2516A ST-28A page I of I OCT-16-01 10 :23 FROM :ROHERT PECCIABASSOC . ID :406447SO36 PAGE 22/30 2611 Gabel d,P.O. Box 80190 LOG OF B O R I N G Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-39" PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-29 GEOTECEMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafcr METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 9/21/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 i ORGANIC CLAY,low to medium plasticity,some roots,dark brownish black,rather moist,stiff to OL rather stiff. (Topsoil) 15 2.5 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and—— di9 SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,brown,moist to waterbearinj•at 3s dense. (Alluvium) GP GM 41 6.5 ---------- - - ---- ----- SILTY GRAVEL with SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,brown,waterbearing,medium dense. (Alluvium) 23 GM 19 10.5 D OF BORING Water down 5'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water down-3'itnmediately after withdrawal of auger. Water not observed to wet cave-in depth of 3.4' immediately after withdrawal of auger. a 0 0 z z z 0 S o q a a 005256A ST-29 page 1 of 1 OCT- 18-01 10 : 23 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 23/30 2611 Gabel-R P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 591 OM 190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-30 GEOTECEVICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer- METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Niwual DATE: 9/20/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark OL brown,rather dry. (I'opsoiI) 6 SILTY GRAVEE with SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,nonplastic,trace roots,brown,rather GM dry,very dense. (Alluviurrl0 61 3.5 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND, fi_ne- ` to coarse-gained,brown,moist,very dense. GP (Alluvium) 62 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,brown,waterbearing,very dense. (Alluvium) 56 GP • _ so 10.5 ` END OF BORING Water down 5.5'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not encountered to dry cave-in depth of 2.5'. immediately after withdrawal of auger. a. a_ c� z z • a - n 4 n �o 005256A ST-30 page I of I OCT-16-01 10 : 23 FROM:ROHERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 24/30 2611 Gabel P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: $T-31 GEOTECBNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached skcmh- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafa METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/21/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,dark OL 11 brown,rather dry,medium..(Topsoil) $ 1.5 _ ___ LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace roots and humus, light olive brown,moist to wet,soft to very soft. (Alluvium) - _ 2 1 CL 1 0 6.0 _ _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SILT and SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,nonplastic,brown, GM moist,very dense. (Alluvium) 66 8.5 __ _ ___ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine GP to coarse-grained,brown,waterbearing,very dense. s (Alluvium) 47/50- up END OF BORING Water down 8.5'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 7.5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. r.. S g Q e a a � 005256A ST-31 page 1 of I OCT- 16-01 10 : 24 FROM,ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:40B 475036 PAGE 25/30 2611 Gabel P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-32 GEOTECHMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Sbafer METHOD; 3 1/4'HSA,Manual DATE: 9/21/01 SCALE: 1^=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,medium plasticity,dark brown, OL rather dry,stiff. (Topsoil) 1.$ IS _ ___ __ _ _ POORLY GRADED SAND with GRAVEL,fine- Sp, to coarse-gxainedt trace Silt,dark brown,lather moist,dense. (Alluvium) 33 3.0 _ __ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,trace Cobbles,dark brown,waterbearing,very dense. (Alluvium) 70 GP GM 47 i 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 9'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to wet cave-in depth of 3.3' immediately after withdrawal of auger. o 0 CJ, 8 z z 4 c a a 005256A �. ST-32 page I of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 24 FROM�ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 26/30 2611 Gabel RA PP.O.Box 80190 LOG OF B O R 1 N G Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: $T-33 GEOTECHMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD. 3 1/4-HSA,Manual DATE: 9/21101 SCALE: I"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 0.0 i ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,black, OL i i moist,medium. (Topsoil) 8 1.5 LEA—NCLA�wiih�AND,low plasticity,olive CL brown,wet,medium. (Alluvium) 6 1/4 3.0 __ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,trace Silt,dark brown,moist to 40 waterbearing at 5,medium dense to dense. (Alluvium) 26 GP s • a 38 8.5 CLA-EY G-tAVFL with SANll,fine-to` — coarse-grained,low plasticity,brown,waterbearing, GC dense:-(Alluvium)- 32 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 5'with T of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to wet cave-in depth of 4.5' immediately after withdrawal of auger. a 0 v 'a O P • N h a ' a 005256A — — SI'-33 page I of I OCT-18-01 10 : 24 FROM :ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID :40*503S PAGE 27/30 Elk 2611 Gabel ARP.O.Box 80190 - - .' LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone. (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-34A GEOTECBNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design Displaced 40'N,see attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafer MEtHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/24/01 SCALE_ I"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL qp Remarks 00 OL i i ORG.4MC CLAY,low plasticity,some roots,darkn. 1.0 brow ,moist,medium. (Topsoil) CL LEAN CLAY wuh SAND,low plasticity,trace a 1/2 Bag sample from P to 2.0 toots,dark olive brown,moist,medium. 4'.. SANDY LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,light olive CL brown,wet,soft. (Alluvium) .3 ' 3:S CET CLAY,low plasticity, trace S nd—,wet to __ waterbearing at 4',very soft. (Alluvium) S CL 6.5 POORLY GRAD®GRAVEL with SAND,fine-' to coarse-grained,trace silt,dark brown, 28 waterbearing,medium dense to dense. (Alluvium) GP ab • s � b - 35 i 13.5 PO OR--Y GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and GP SILT,fine'to coarse-grained,trace Cobbles,dark GM brown,waterbearing,very dense. (.Alluvium) 66 15.5 END OF BORING Water down T with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground_ Water down 6.7 immediately after withdrawal of auger. Warerbearing soils observed at a depth of about 4 1/2'while drilling. a 0 4 e a. 005256A ST-34A page i of t OCT-16-01 10 : 24 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406f S036 PACE 26/30 2611 Gabel Roa P.O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 591OM190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST�5 GEOTECEMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch. Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S_Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/21/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL cip R marks 0.0 OL i ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity'some roots,dark 1.0 brown,rather-dry,-tathcr.soft. (Topsoil) LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace roots,light olive 9 2.0 CL brown,rather dry,rather stiff. (Alluvium) POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SILT and GP SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,brown,moist,dense. 38 GM (Alluvium) 4.0 _ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- to coarse-grained,brown,moist to waterbearing at GP .� 5.4%very de=- (Alluvium) 54 SL 6.0 __ POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SILT and SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,.brown, waterbearing,dense. (Alluvium) 33 GP GM 30 10.5 END OF BORING Water down 5.4'with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed fb dry cave-in•depth of 3.3' immediately after withdrawal of auger. 0 ' o d , S v d 0 005256A ST-35 pagc I of 1 OCT- 16-01 10 : 25 FROM: ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 29/30 261 i.Gabel R P.O.Boa 80190 LOG OF BORING B171ings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax_ (406)652-3944 • PROJECT: 005256A BORING: ST-36A GEOTECEMCAL EVALUATION LOCATION. Utility Design 11N'and 67-of staked location,see attached Baxter Meadows Subdivision sketch. Bozeman,Montana DRILLED BY: S.Shafcr METHOD: 3 1/4'HSA,Manual I DATE: 9/21/01 SCALE: 1"=3' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF WL QP Remarks 0.0 I I ORGANIC CLAY,low to medium plasticity,some OL roots,trace Gravel,dark brown,rather moist,rather 1.5 I I stiff_ ('Topsoil) 9 CL LE`N CLAY with SAND,medium plasticity,olive 2 5 brown,rather moist,very stiff. (Alluvium) POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND,fine- — Ion9 to coarse-grained,trace Cobbles and Silt,gray, rather moist to waterbearing at 7 1/2',very dense. (Alluvium) 75 • GP 59 s • 70 11.0 ---- CLAYEY GRAVEL with SAND,fine-to coarse-grained,16V plasticity,dark brown, waterbearing,medium dense to verydense. (Alluvium) so SC -some Cobbles below14'. 15.5. 89 END OF BORING Water down 7.5'with 14'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 2.4' immediately after withdrawal of auger. S a o . 0 o n • b b Y M256A ST-36A page 1 of 1 OCT-16-01 10 : 25 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406 5036 PAGE 30/30 2611 Gabel Road,P_O.Box 80190 LOG OF BORING Billings,Montana 59108-0190 Phone: (406)652-3930, Fax: (406)652-3944 PROTECT: 005256A BORING: ST-37 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: Utility Design See attached sketch- Baxter Meadows Subdivision Bozeman,Montana DR LLED BY: S.Shafer METHOD: 3 1/4"HSA,Manual DATE: 9/25/01 SCALE: F=3' ' Elev. Depth Symbol Description of Materials BPF IWL' qp Remarks 0.0 ORGANIC CLAY,low plasticity,dark brown, 1.0 OL rather dry,very stiff. (Topsoil) LEAN CLAY with SAND,medium plasticity,trace 9nz roots,olive brown,rather dry,very stiff_ (Alluvium) CL 17 3.5 _ SANDY LEAN CLAY,low plasticity,trace roots, light olive brown,rather dry,stiff. (Alluvium) ' CL 13 6.0 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL with SAND and SILT,fine-to coarse-grained,trace cobbles,gray, rather dry,very dense to dense. (Alluvium) sa r GP GM 10.5 1 az END OF B®RING Water not observed with 9'of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water not observed to dry cave-in depth of 3' immediately after withdrawal of auger. 4 a' O O 2 z o • a ` - O R h aO a 005256A ST-37 page 1 ofl • Appendix "E 1 " Baxter Meadows • 10/19/01 Appendix E-1 — Re.sic/eirliul Design GtrideliMIS • • AI'.PE NDIX E-1: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Jnlrnclrrrlicrn Guard Rails Energy and Conservation Protect Statement Witter Coil servatioll Coillnlunity Patterns Energy Conservation Definitions C011SU-nCtioll Neighhorhood Baver Meadows Overall Plan Time (JulIdelines Tree. Preservation and Removal Site Planning Landscape Installation and Circulation and Mobility Maintenance Street Sections - Grading GUldelilleS Suhcolleetol- Street Maintenance Residential Streets Private Property Owners Alley Home Owners Association Courtyards Arrangement of Uses and Features Landscape Puhlic Areas, Schools and Parks Street and trails. Natural Features Private Space — Frontyards, Creating a Livable Environment Rearyards Vegetation removal • Architecture Landscape installation Character and Essential Elements .Maintenance Materials and Color irrigation Root- Pitches and Materials Parking Areas Entrances Tree Selection Balconies and Decks Fences/Gates/Walls/Trellises Exterior Stairs Street Frontage-Ornamental. Doors Street Frontage-Privacy Windows Open Space Sheet Metal/Flashing/Vents Lighting Gutters and Downspouts Exterior Lighting Crash and Recycling Containers Spill Over Lighting Mail and Newspaper Boxes Dark Sky Maintenance Mechanical Equiplllent/Utility Ambiance and Character Meters Skylights and Energy Signage Conservation Equiprllent Submittal RcgLUre tile[its Play Equiplllent Definitions Pools and Hut Tuhs Prohibited Si'vns Clotheslines Permitted Signs Fireplaces and Stoves Parcel Entry Fire Sprinklers Street Name Si�k,ns • Associated Structures 'Municipal/RegLIlatory • w Appendix E-1 — Residemial Design Guidelines Temporary Markcting Signs Fences • Temporary Future. Use Signs Setbacks Temporary Construction Garages inlormation Signs Building Height Tet»porary Directional Signs Architecture Character Temporary Lot Marker Banners Bungalows Address identification Lot Size National or State Flags Building Coverage Parkin4o Hcnrsirr ;uiclrlincs Fences Setbacks Estate Lots Garages Lot'Sizc Building [leiglit Building Coverage- ArchltCCIUI'e Character Parking Fences Condominiums Setbacks Lett Size Garages Building Coverage Building Height Parking Architecture Character Fences Setbacks Traditional Homes Garages. Lot Size Building Height • Building Coverage - Architecture Character Parking Fences Townhomes Setbacks Lot Size Garages Building Coverage Building Height Parking Architecture—Chard ter Fences Setbacks Village Homes Garages Lot Size Building Height Building Coverage AlchiteClUfe Character Parking Fences Work/live . Setbacks Lot Size Garages Building Coverage Building Height Parking Architecture Character Fends Setbacks Cottage Humes Gara ,es Lot Size Building Heiglu Buildin,, CuveraLre Architecture Character Parkirlg� • Appendix "ET' Baxter Meadows • 10/19/01 Appendix E-2- Coorcial Design Guidelines APPENDIX E-2—COMMERCIAL • DESIGN GUIDELINES Introduction Grading Guidelines Maintenance Project Statement Private Property Owners Community Patterns Commercial Owners Association Definitions Landscape Site Planning Street and trails Circulation and Mobility Private Space-Frontyards, Davis Street Rearyards Collector Street Vegetation removal Arrangement of Uses and Features Landscape installation Public Areas Maintenance Natural Features Irrigation Structures. Parking Areas Creating a Livable Environment Tree Selection Heights Fences/Gates/Walls/Trellises Parking Street Frontage-Ornamental Street Frontage-Privacy Architecture Open Space • Materials and Color Lighting Roof Pitches and Materials Exterior Lighting Entrances Spill Over Lighting Balconies and Decks Dark Sky Maintenance Fences/Gates/Walls/Trellises Ambiance and Character Awnings Exterior Stairs Signage Doors Submittal Requirements Windows Definitions Sheet Metal/Flashing/Vents Prohibited Signs Gutters and Downspouts Permitted Signs Trash and Recycing Containers Parcel Entry Mechanical Equipment/Utility Street Name Signs Meters Municipal/Regulatory Skylights and Energy Temporary Marketing Signs- Conservation Equipment Temporary Future Use Signs Energy and Conservation Temporary Construction Water Conservation Information Signs Energy Conservation Temporary Directional Signs Construction Temporary Lot Marker Time Guidelines Banners Tree Preservation and Removal Address Identification • Landscape Installation and National or State Flags Maintenance Appendix E-2— Commercial Design Guidelines Mixed Use Neighborhood Center • Office/Business Site Planning Architecture Landscape Signage Lighting Parking Art Retail/Mixed Use Site Planning Architecture Landscape Signage Lighting Parking Art Public Facilities Building Coverage Parking Fences • Setbacks Garages Residential Site Planning Architecture Landscape Signage Lighting Parking Art • • • Appendix "F" Baxter Meadows • 10/19/01 Baxter Meadows • Response to Staff Comments 9/19/2001- Appendix F Neil Poulsen,Building Official: 1. A detailed site-grading plan will be provide for phase I once the street and road typical sections have been finalized. 2. A geotechnical investigation is currently being conducted by SK Geotechnical. A copy of their geotechnical report will be submitted. 3. Building foundation elevations will be staked by a certified Montana Registered Engineer as necessary. 4. Comment is noted. Mike Certalic, Water/Sewer Superintendent 1. Vehicle access will be provided. 2. Looping of all water mains over 500 feet in length will be provided. However, some of the loops may not be completed until subsequent phases of the subdivision are • constructed. 3. Valves will be eliminated from the terminated ends per the comment. 4. Symbols will be changed. S. The final location of the lift station has not yet been determined. The exact location of the lift station and forcemain will be shown on the preliminary plat. 6. With annexation the City of Bozeman should accept responsibility. Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Services 1. Per revised schedule dated 5110/01 2. The revised traffic analysis will be completed within the next two weeks and will be submitted for review. This comment will be addressed further at that time. 4. .If necessary plans and specs will be submitted to the county. 6. The amendment to the wastewater facility plan has been submitted. A computer model of the water system is being completed and will be submitted for review. • 8. Comment noted. 9. We will keep the R.O.W. at the 90' cross section shown for Ferguson. We want the -traffic on this road to be slower and to create &pedestrian friendly street. This road will • bisect the project and we will have homes fronting Ferguson. 10. We will change the Residential ROW to 60'. In order to maintain a neo-traditional streetscape we would propose to add 1' of ROW behind the sidewalks. We would like to keep the Neighborhood Green ROW at 42', but will increase the travel way from 10' to 12'. This would allow a 10' one-way traveling lane and a 7' on-street parking area. We will change the Equestrian Court to provide two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' in areas where needed for on-street guest parking, therefore we will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. 11. The traffic-calming device on Baxter would be designed as a traffic circle and not a roundabout. We agree that a round about is engineered to manage the merging of.very large traffic volumes. Our goal is to slow down traffic speeds along Baxter. This neo- traditional neighborhood has been designed with homes fronting on Baxter Lane. We strongly believe that defining the character of Baxter Lane early with a traffic-calming . device will provide for a safer pedestrian-oriented streetscape for the neighborhood. We will change reference from roundabout to traffic circle. A report from Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)District 6,July 20-23, 1997 reported that in addition to reducing accidents, they found traffic circles are effective at reducing vehicle speed without significantly reducing traffic volume. We will move the bike path to the North side of Baxter. • 12. We are proposing a 20-alley R.O.W with 24' clearance between units. In addition we will maintain an 187 interior radius to allow proper maneuverability for garbage trucks..The homeowner association will take care of the snow removal in the alleys. 14. We feel that the location of the traffic circle is in the proper location. Our goal is to calm traffic along Baxter Lane and increase safety for children and other residents. In addition, we do not want to discourage traffic along Davis Road by placing a traffic- calming device on Baxter and Davis. 15. Inside the residential neighborhood we advocate that sidewalks and bike paths be shared. It distances the bicyclist from the traveling automobile and provides a safer environment for children. However, we realize the need for the serious biker who relies on a bike path system as a primary mode of transportation. We will provide bike lanes along larger roads like Davis and Oak. 16. In phase I the only direct access to Baxter is at the Bed and Breakfast and the Community Center. We will work with the City on future phases. 17. Water and sewer services will be shown on the preliminary plat submittal. • w - w . Morrison-Maierle Streets: 1. We will provide an access for emergency vehicles which will connect to Baxter. This access will be grasscrete or other approved material. 2. We will address that in Phase 2 and incorporate this comment into the design of the phase 2 homes and street layout. 3. We will provide an 90' ROW on Ferguson, we will be requesting a deviation from providing a bike lane on both sides of Ferguson. We would like to, as much as possible, maintain a neighborhood/pedestrian scale on Ferguson. We felt that providing an additional bike lane and increasing the width and pavement of Ferguson would deviate from a neo-traditional development. Also in order to maintain the proper scale of Ferguson, we would rather not provide a 1' center strip down the center of the road. 4. In Phase One, single family and town house units are planned along Baxter Lane. We narrowed the driving lanes to 10' to reduce the traffic speed and increase safety along Baxter Lane. We strongly feel that 10' driving lanes and a traffic circle will benefit the neighborhood from both an aesthetics and safety point of view. Please see additional response to Concern 11 above. • S. Street sections E and D are designed as country roads. In these areas the neighborhood transitions towards the equestrian area. 6. We will change street section G to 60'. In order to maintain a neo-traditional streetscape we would propose to add 1' of ROW behind the sidewalks. 7. We are proposing a 20-alley row with 24' clearance between units. In addition we will maintain an 18' interior radius to allow proper maneuverability for garbage trucks. The homeowner association will provide the snow removal for the alleys. 8. We would like to eliminate the parking along the linear park. We want people to be able to drive along this road and experience the open space park. We also think that it is safer not to have parking along the park side to avoid people cutting in between the parked cars. 9. We will change the Equestrian Court to provide two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for guest on street parking in areas where that parking is needed. We will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. 10. We will revise the Davis street section to include 5' sidewalks and to also to provide a commuter bike route in the street. 11. We will provide a secondary gravel access to the equestrian center,-which will run to the west of the drainage channel and tie into.Baxter. • 12. We will discuss the maintenance of the roads and alleys with the City. We are currently thinking that the roads and the alleys will be public. The homeowner association will provide snow removal in the alleys. 13. The traffic-calming device on Baxter would be designed as a traffic circle and not a roundabout. We agree that a round about is engineered to manage the merging of very large traffic volumes. Our goal is to slow down traffic speeds along Baxter. This neo- traditional neighborhood has been designed with homes fronting on Baxter Lane. We strongly believe that defining the character of Baxter Lane early with a traffic-calming device will provide for a safer pedestrian-oriented streetscape for the neighborhood. We will change reference from roundabout to traffic circle. A report from Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) District 6, July 20-23, 1997 reported that in addition to reducing accidents, they found traffic circles are effective at reducing vehicle speed without significantly reducing traffic volume. Storm Water Issues: 1. These are irrigation ditches whose flows are controlled by the irrigation district. 2. Per discussion at the last review meeting; the ditch will not be relocated. • 3. Existing easements and setbacks will be shown. 4. A grading-plan will be included with the preliminary plat. Sewer: 1. The minimum depth of the sewer was set at 5 ft per'City of Bozeman Standards. What is the minimum depth that will be required for the interceptor? The maximum available depth will be controlled by the depth of the interceptor at the southwest corner of the Cattail Creek Subdivision. 2. The area south of the equestrian area and south of Baxter Lane and West of Ferguson is outside of the sewer service planning area. Therefore, it is not necessary to extend these mains to Baxter. 3. We do not believe that access will be a problem. Provisions will be made during final design to insure access. 4. Final main depths will be set during the actual design of the sewer mains and the depths will take into account the depth of the sewer services that will connect to the • mains. There will not be basements in any of the proposed structures so it will be possible to keep the mains at a shallower depth. The minimum depths per City of Bozeman Standards will be maintained. Water: 1. The watermain will be designed as a 12-inch. Z As discussed above, this area is also outside of the water system planning area. Therefore, is it not necessary to extend these mains to the south. Parks: 1. The pocket parks, linear park and neighborhood green will be privately owned and maintained by the homeowners association. 2. The equestrian open space will be maintained and owned by the owner of the equestrian center. General Issues: 1. We are working with the utility companies on this issue. • 3. The access into the town home area is not intended to be a road. It is intended to be a driveway that will only serve the people who live there. 4. We will include elevations for all unit types in phase I. Design review Board Comments: 1.It is difficult to integrate different housing types within one block and still achieve some of the goals of the project: high density, affordability and marketability.Different housing types would require different lot depths and widths.In order to have high density you must have efficient layouts which intermixing makes difficult.The amount of land used calls for concentration of density, without it there is an increase land cost per house. Lastly this project must be successful. The market is not used to.this approach. We feel there is diversity at Baxter Meadows.We are providing seven different housing types in just.one phase of our project.In fact we have six of those types with four blocks along the neighborhood green.That kind of diversity is difficult to find even in older neighborhoods. The cottage homes will range in size from 800 s.f.to 1600 s.f.. The Village homes will range from 1400 s.f. to 1850 s.f.. The homes will be one story and two and will have a variety of architectural character, which will include craftsmen, farmhouse and prairie styles. The homes will also have a variety of color for both the body and the roofs. Please keep in mind this is only one phase of the project.As you can see from the attached illustration,Phase I is only one portion of the over all patchwork quilt that is the fabric of our community at • Baxter Meadows. 2. This alley design is used in other neo-traditional neighborhoods where snow removal is an issue such as Boulder: There will be a minimum of a two-car garage, per unit in the • single-family homes.The garages will be oversized to accommodate additional storage. We will also look at the possibility of a storage facility in the future phases. 3. This will be covered as part of the annexation agreement. 4. We will provide streetscape elevations. • • I • Appendix "G" Baxter Meadows • 10/19/O1 OCT-18-01 1S: S6 FROM:ROBERT PEC,CIA&ASSOC . ID:406*03S PAGE Appendix G - Traffic Traffic Impacr Analysis Baxter Meadows Development Robert Peccia&Associates Bozeman, Montana October.2001 I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION If. EXISTING CONDITIONS Baxter Lane Davis Lane Harper Puckett Road Additional Developments Traffic Counts Level of Service Ill. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Proposed Roadway Layout Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Development.Timeframe IV. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT • V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION VI. TRAFFIC IMPACTS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT VI1. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Phase 2 Traffic Impacts Phase 3 Traffic Impacts Phase 4 Traffic impacts Phase 6 Traffic Impacts Vlil. . IMPACT SUMMARY IX. RECOMMENDATIONS • 1 OCT-16-01 15 : 56 FROM=ROBE T PECCIABASSOC . ID:4064415036 PAGE 3/3 Traffic Impact Analysis Baxter Meadows Development Robert Peccia cF Associates Bozeman.Montana October,2001 List of Tables TABLE 1 - Level of Service (LOS) Summary TABLE 2-Trip Generation Rates TABLE 3-Level of Service (LOS) Summary Without Development TABLE 4-Phase 2 Level of Service (LOS) TABLES - Phase 3 Level of Service (LOS) TABLE 6 -Phase 4 Level of Service (LOS) TABLE 7 -Phase 6 Level of Service (LOS) TABLE 9-Percent increases in 2010 volumes with development List of Figures FIGURE 1 - Location Map FIGURE 2 - Proposed Development FIGURE 3 - Street type and lane configuration FIGURE 4 - Proposed street cross-sections. FIGURE 5 - Proposed street cross-sections. FIGURE 6 - Development Trip Distribution *r MITFIUN Ardt' tsiDealQne[saMannen 1 � I / urn Alaalun War SIM W 306 NORD CT. - — I I 1 I I - 1 1 / 1 1. - PREPARED FOR: - ---- Williams Brothers i - 1 \ \ / �\ � % /%/• �- Construction / ' 1 1035 Cerise'Road Billings,Montana 50101 PROJECT: CREEK BARTER MEADOWS j VETERINARY I \ % ESTATE! r BUFFER LOCATION: 1 AC. Bozeman,Montana I I j j CREEK \. % HOMES; I y --- - - i L- - ---- - - - -- ---- - - - -- - - ' 1 I L- - -- - --- -- -- - I BUFFER --- i EQUESTRIAN CENTER \ \ _ 10AC. ! PHASE ONE BOONDARY ! j TRADITIONAL COTTAGE HOMES ' ' HOMES 1 JWOhK EOUESTRUN LANE p nrt aVau CONDOMINIUMS 1 - \ \ � r � \ �� •j 'I I - - - -.�- - \ > j ; j � ----' IL�D .,.,.a.rt \ ESTATE j r --- --- - - --- - - - -- HOMES r - S - / `, I - - - 10 �••� 1 0.1W 0C ' I ' _ --• j ' ---- - - ---- - --- - --- ow I 1 Ba.LF.BK,JW -" oPiIONAL2 Ij I _ — i IwZEt""�` ; TOWNHOMES CAR GARAGE t:• D j -�•• l , INITIALS 41 �,- `�- ! _ _ — i ! !- !- i ► Exhibit "AN •�. j 1 - ii. -,------ •,�•• j i i i i i i i i - --- - - --- - - -— - - - - - - - -- --- - -------- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- — — - - Phase 1 _ BAXTER LANE rMYV AN - ----- - — — — Site Plan ----- - -- - - - - - - --- - ------- - - - - - - -- - -- ----- - -- - --- -- UNIT SUMMARY ;�(LL GE\HOMES ' xm[ m-PPCL • vviz >wvsrr avu [sT tomtwa•tw°t+•L \ \ \ . 32 ESTATE HOMES-Lot Size 120'x110' 1 BED&BREAKFAST eat -Will >.Wl -mill .01 °i r 20 TRADITIONAL HOMES-Lot Size 82.5'x90' 1 VETERINARY OFFICE 'All >vmrrt �•IT >�Amrn �aE a �w®D .,nvwvma PN \ \• Ba ~R"OTY Beae0FAKFAST \ \ (82.5'x91'ON FERGUSON) 1 COMMUNITY CENTER 01236.00 �.' 20 VILLAGE HOMES-Lot Size 46'x89' 1 EQUESTRIAN CENTER . %o >cv[Tt -or >wm"t aor L -AnA.Ae <nwvivm"�°.11 \. \ T 0�" r� i i \ \ \ \ \ 10/29/01 40 COTTAGE HOMES-Lot SIZE 42'x64' at >wova >.vr: >vmors �•DIT tmL �rima�N�*mn v�onc�•'Pi \•.\ '\ O L •,\ 19 TOWNHOMES eat -writ -at >.AmBS'° -or, or - —H>a•»D 7 LIVE/WORK 61mOm+�W 20 CONDOMINIUMS Phase One Area: eal >amws -ar >.Amvro '•wr °I _11®stia Lm.Or=;a li \ \• \ + 64.66 Acres i V°I TAV LI'C .CL'°I -WPErl -o'K a �R-14d .1%nria _ \ - ' II\ill - •\ SCALE: 1" - ,10Q' MITHUN t I I 1 I I I I I I I Archl len+Plann[n I=AAI&Sb wy I �•. I I Sum aoo • ( 1 I 1 r Suede,WA / 'D rL__----yl V I rf I I m SOB 6ri"" AM � ARa 306 623.1RnS EOVESTN LANE PIRE FOFL ! 1,,�o"o - _._ E R? •� 1 J I`— - — I l iaWlms Broth ers C ConstructionX 1035 Cerise Road _ vilp-0 Billings,Montana 5 9101 i I I I i r I I +,- i — C \' I PROJEM �— 3 I G BAXTER MEADOWS 1 I — [°an°w. 6OZELSTREEr i Bozeman,Montana / BARTER IANE(Wv ArWM I i I I I I I I 0 SCALE: 1" 100' N ., DD • � •A•e °.•p a P D•° °•4 0 P P e° °••0 9�7 d eo °off�' o• °`�o o°O�° o ! lssl gyp.° ,��� ���DAVIS ROAD NORTH OF BAXTER 4 0 a � O• D 0 4 °• a• oe •eo°°• •eo°°• v v o BAXTER INITIAL 000 n R.O.WJ II II II II �$'-0'I T•fi' I 10'•0' ` 10'•0' 1 6.0 I T•6 15.011 ° w1DA[ nAxreR fi DRM nvc ARnxo6.nAxreR wme. r-o .oa.w.. o r-s r•o 16•o r-o r-6 s'•o A R e• W� �s ,.a•• �R ns r,r $•-°• 1'-0' 10'-D• 1D••D• 14••0' $•'° 2•.0• 5m[- RANTG 6 IARRLW DAM PARRDW 6'RAxr[R a0R- 2'•0• '. BK 1.° SIDE- PIANI[R DIM DIM RANTER •"A,1°[' I•.0 •••G •'LL" �•� A. BAXTER LANE 1105 ft R.O.W. AR �" J. ARABIAN COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) Minor Arterial) G. LATIGO AVENUE d BOZEL STREET APPALOOSA COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) 7 R D. EQUESTRIAN LANE (60 ft R.O.W.) BELGIAN COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) Q Bs _ 160 ft R.O.W.I CYDESOALE COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) -0II• L— �,�1•'�Ila•�1•'�rldI''-0Ilr� BS,LF,BKJW FJORD COURT 154 rt R.O.W.) e m r DAVIS ROAD NORTH OF BAXTER INITIALS FUTURE 000 ft R.O.WJ °'a a ,•° 0 4 °oo •oo°O• • 0 0 Exhibit°Ct 61 ,°- 20•-0' 10- D'•0 10 SETBACK 2.0 2O•10'-0- i 0' 1 ' 1 '•0' U 14•-0' - • SETDACK eme •'•10" , •• 4'••®i° •°•• (-0' •�•• �®D' IW1n DP[N ORM pAM RAIIT[A 5'YEANO[Rp0 1'-°' PAVED ° Street Sections oewuR DAVIS ROAD SOUTH OF BAXTER sl ,Qe zo.-0 INITIAL 1100 ft R.O.W.) ° B. FERGUSON AVENUE too ft R.O.W.) E. RIATA ROAD 160 ft R.O.W) H. ALLEY .120 ft R.O.W.) OEADMANS GULTCH ROAD •� INITIAL IGO ft R.O.W.) v•O O °•a O G P•° '•4 O °pp°16•d °06�°16•f� P 4 °�• •° o ° a °0 6°f. 0 q a 4 O• n °o pD •O oe •eo°O• 01236.00 Ian v v s a v ��• EOReeN r<u.�—.'..I 8"I�'lo� 1 p° �o:�l�d• Is�l:I.o _ ))• ) )) DR) i ) ) ° 12'-0• 1 10•-6• ll 12--0• r•o- � r-6- Is•-o•U ) s-o ,o•o j ,o'-o f a-o 10 DAVIS ROAD SOUTH of BAXTER DEADMANSrGULTCH ROAD 6'•0' T-6' T-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' T-0' T-fi' $'- GR[[N 6' ORM PARRDlD 6•"I-Axf[R 51D[- T-0• 1'-0' r-o• ,"ARr[R 6•P,RR nrvE DRM I,"s,xD 6•n.xrR. � I.O• WLLR vRR 6 oaM °RM PARaxo 6' vuxTER wws FUTURE t100 ft R.O.W.) FUTURE 1D0 ft R.O.W.) �,+•� C. EQUESTRAIN LANE 162 ft R.O.W.) F. GALLATIN GREEN I. BAXTER PARKWAY (60 ft R.O.W.) 142 ft R.O.W. EACH SIDE OF GREEN) SET NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION COPYPoOHT02001 NRHUN,INC. w-10 0 DEADMANS GULCH ROAD WETLAND AREAS m i ► ' WETLAND IDENTIFICATION AREA/ACRES W-1 ® 6.6359 II W-2 0.7480 W- ► ' � W-3 2.3244 W-4 0.6611 o c�, `- w-5 ® 2.6055 o W-6 1.9376 p ► W-7 ® 0.4125 = c r� W-8 0 10.9521 o g W-10 Q 1.2342 a W-11 ® 0.7424 p / V Q J, • � . / IUA)- 4pp� m J Q W 6 m N W IS y do tic O� W I W-3 o ' .` W-1 ` 0 W-5 c7 W 5 �✓ �, 2 W-3 ,- " � W w-s � WJ F F W_4 ch O - \ K a W-4 ► W 7 ► Z Wad W- W_2 = Z v 3 ' j 1 J H F 3 3 W W 300 0 300 600 - w-5 OAK STREET SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) OF i a JDEAD MAWS GULCH LEGEND m • 1 L MANHOLE LINE = PARK WETLAND SANITARY SEWER OPEN SPACE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Q LIFT STATION s FORCE MAIN T„ PHASE ONE LIMITS HOTEL WATER COURSE LIMITS p CONVENTION CENTER z a O PROPERTY BOUNDARY _z cr W C! p -3 Y U d 0. a z le m T W in4 O m Qg ;i W in m Nto.i & N 2 EOIESTRUIN !S N a v W CENTER 7 o O u n FVLLAGE GREEN VOCRET 1 BAXTER LANE BAXTER LANE j 1 � o COMMUNITY CENTER/ Q BED & BREAKFAST W ♦Y `W W r r ORH00 0 m pQ ARK ¢ O N U a, W Z O N (L 0 PROPOSED REGIONAL 1c PARK Lu W Hy m � Scc Luw J Z F H Q r Cl) w w x • Vf 300 0 300 600 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) OAK STREET r- OF \plotting\24x36\ito300\j.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15AIA4 r Hill � a LEGEND Co MANHOLE z 0 40 SANITARY SEWER �_ Q O =—— SANITARY SEWER SERVICE � PHASE ONE LIMITS Y WATER COURSE LIMITS N PROPERTY BOUNDARY Q 0 N z I 1 V (7 z Q W O w < K ^ J U1 o a 4 z a Z X r Om V 1 Zp O> O Co 3Z ui V)m NW tA2 J3 F u C�O f.�O O X POCKET7101 PARK � . o � � Ahl • 1 y C Q W fY W W X J~ nM F - I W 0 Cr a. BAXTER LANE o o cc W Q I 0 W O Q O - y zo COMMUNITY CENTER/ W x � J W Z BED & BREAKFAST W a y • 100 0 100 200 rr SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) w `� J1 OF ..\plotting\24x36\lto100\ji.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15:27:44 a a a r Hill LEGEND MANHOLE z 0 SANITARY SEWER N ——— SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS WATER COURSE LIMITS N PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0 z r Z o ' u UO Z VETERINARY 0 a a N W O S LL a Z ]e O. (AZ mp 0> 0 m 3 z W N w V,2 J3cc �U N Q U W CEO CEO 0 U EQUESTRIAN CENTER r� y O G a [[ W I W XJ r m S r W 0 O a � a W 7 4 � y _ cc xa W W H Z r a r y W — W 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) BAXTER LANE J2 OF \plotting\24x36\itol00\j2.dgn Oct. 19. 2001 15:28:21 W Q O K 6 J l DEAD MAN'S GULCH I m J LEGEND P J I C'•' \ r' / gr EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS = ,.. % o PARK• WETLAND �j� EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS / � j •� ...-'OPEN SPACE _ PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS a PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS A. ; � �•- DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW Y �{r N •�',:.. ��' ,:�� �. -'- ����• �•�. •F13 STORM WATER DETENTION POND •._ ., it \ ' L''�/, I \, ���. 'x*•`,. HOZEL-• PHASE ONE LIMITS ' 11 ;¢ :`• �"�'"' .,� -CONVENTION CENTER I ao WATER COURSE LIMITS Z\,�' fY;,� �• ' �, z 1 -�`^ o� t Cr . :�• 1 }, `. '^ /' .�I::` J ba'F /--)'• 1 1 h PROPERTY BOUNDARY o' Up 39 LLP ',' •1.'• �i. .I•;fAp55.' ALE _ � : r�.�.:.;z IV m m .4• QQ 1QRA%Sy S ALE ` { &. ..y. •i r u s ti Leo Ou- o:� TRUN - r• .DUES . G %�..•\` .: �t�..•.• -{ �.✓�"TE`�-` -of EN,p�TEpp,p, �.. .. •. �, FLOW .. :... y� q I!p } VLLAGE I I 11�.t:.tit°:.,^-�s^:u.1�4•�.=�,^-•at.►.��'3E:�.=���.'s?=�=�=; � � r- _- - .. _ x� -s..� -a'r- '•'•,� --`*-.-, -- - '��.x:s- � �• BAXTER LANE BAXT R LANE 'BEQk BREA}hfAST rl ' ..... W IV ui • ;�' :• :. a 86RHD ..... ARK. k a � Cr Ld PROPOSD Z cc 1 f• Lu Co W ' W 300 0 300 600 %. �cU-- 1�- SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) OAK STREET I K OF \plotting\24x36\ito300\k.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15:22:21 W F Q 0 Q Q > LEGEND I J' I L_, , it i ----- EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS ' . - '-- zo EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS > PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS •\� � ���`�• PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW N r �i! . . _ STOW- W'A T E+R Q � S: � � STORM WATER DETENT 1 ON POND � PHASE ONE LIMITS DE EN ION POND ( -Y of I \` WATER COURSE LIMITS w o Z Q ��: W PROPERTY BOUNDARY Q it J il�• ;; z x i�. m > ,,,. d zo o> om Q W V)m N o 3 2 W W i Nc� J Z x J. 0.6 OFRK T ' VER P If ; O / a W ,1 W X .-.-a-.�,:--:-•. _.-..-rN...n.•�•y4t ...s.a ..: � - c ^w'f.��1. . .... -'�--....-.,�.. _ - 1'�l P.i's*YS--r �.W.— — W BAXTER LANEEl. - z Q a - Y m J 0 Q � rl wa O COMMUNITY � E_NTE P / W � Q CC BED & BRE �,:,KF-AS%1 % - W o " - fn 100 0 100 200 Cr SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) W K1 OF \plotting\24x36\ltol00\ki.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15:28.56 a O a LEGEND ---- ;•'h � I .• _ �� EXISTING MINOR CONTOURS o EXISTING MAJOR CONTOURS PROPOSED MINOR CONTOURS it .��c> PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURS 17v"l: � _ 6— DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW N ' 0 STORM WATER DETENTION POND PHASE ONE LIMITS / z WATER COURSE LIMITS Fo z o / PROPERTY BOUNDARY 'o N ' ll VETERINARY 4io a Y t WALE a Z X 1 2 p O> O 3 z LaCD N W r Vl 2 J 2 V _ •' C .. _ N Q VIx W px GRA*S'SY SWALE 1 11. EQUESMAN C E N T._.�FR cn ' O � S W cr Oct z i 1 � .... Y � J� 'a O� Lu 1 _ _ mcnz Lu IY .�. _ 00 - - cn 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) B A X T E R LANE K2 OF \p1otting\24x36\1to100\k2.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15:29:26 MITHUN �• e"'�T*c'— _ / Archftcta+D"Ignen Planners •-� y'- i i � —•-J' � ,'' APPAL00[A[OURT GTREET TREES \ BAXTER MEADOWS STREET TREES Bozeman Montano BE7UlA PAPYRIFERA PAPER BIRCH 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6'HT. Plu M 0atl2nWay ARARIAN COURT STREET TREES SIOte 200 1 i OTY.,BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENTS Swale,WA im PHELLODENDRON AMURENSE CORKTREE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. A 206623.3.44 ! .A I ATIN N STR ET TR F"206 623,700S O — 76 ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM J"GAL BRANCHED AT 6' HT. TREES .1 A- / ;• - ; — \ ACER PLATANOIDES 'DEBORAH' DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. \ EQUESTRIAN LANE STREET TREES ! \ 158 FRAXINUS PENNSLWANICA 'PATMORE' PATMORE GREEN ASH 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. CLYSDALE COURT STREET TREE ` -•\ I \ TILIA COROATA UTTLELEAF LINDEN 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6'HT. PREPARED FOR: ` I \ RD7EL STREET TREES Cons 52 GLEDRISIA TRIACANTHOS 'SKYUNE' SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' KT: COURT '2 I � \ FIORD 0 IRT STREET TR S � Construction OUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6-HT. 1 LAXIGO STREET TRFEs 1035 Cerise Road i I 32 ACER PLATANOIDES 'CRIMSON KING' CRIMSON KING NORWAY MAPLE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. BAXTER PARKWAY STREET TREES Billings,Montana 59101 I i SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2"CAL + SINGLE STEM —T- ————� I FERGUSON STREET TREES.- - POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2"CAL + I i 31 ACER PLATANOIDES 'EMERALD QUEEN' NORWAY MAPLE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' KT. RHOS TYPHINq STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 "CAL. PINUS SP. PINE 6- 8'HT. I OR PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6-8'Hi. I / J1 ACER PLATANOIOES 'DEBORAH' DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. PROJECT. BAXTER MEADOWS EOUESTRIAN BAVER LME STREET TREE OPEN SPACE SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2"CAL + SINGLE STEM LOCATION: MEADOW POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2"CAL + Bozeman,Montana 1 L. _. —__.� ; �.� - -'-�.\ PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 - 8' HT. �. PINUS SP. PINE 6 - 8'M. \ 1 \ RIATA ROA STR ET TREES ' L SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2"CAL + SINGLE STEM _ POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2"CAL + RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 CAL. \ \I 1 Q I PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6q 8�'' FIT. A ' i PINUS SP. PINE HT- . �` aOuarAwa — —.—•—'y — ulala.m. ; I i I I ! 1 l i I I . I �aewurr ' I r .�•` \ � �� I � I I i i .oam..Incanmolr b do I i CM EOIEBTRIAN I I I I I I OPENSPAC OAta i . I MEADOW C. Iaaw FAw DC I jj I:OIaTId1M ! % i1 i r i ` \ - I I' ------------- %\�11 ; I 1 \. ; Q� vwn K�mlen ! ---- --- ----- --- \ ` I 1 I v+. I BK t A -- ------------ LF.es ' I rmcn.m.an t1i ' I D 1 I I v as sS.LF.BKJW •I INITIALS J1--amym. I I l' O II -'-- -- - - Exhibit"L1" BAXTER (Mk-ATW4 �° Landscape Plan - - --- - - - -----'- - --- - - ----- ---- --- -- --------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - --- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - ---- ---- - - - -- — - —' - - -- e ----- I I I ! I I arw®.w I I 1,I I 1 I II I 1 C I I•I I I II I I O Q a�nb lil 01236.00 i I i N -10/29/01 SCALE: 1'=100'-O' MITHUN Neighborhood Parks Architects+Dnlgn—Plsnnm Bozeman Montano ZJ Pin 56 OTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENTS Suit AlnsbhhWry Suite S00 DECIDUOUS TREES Snek WA 98tm 02 ACER GINNALA AMUR MAPLE 8' HT to 663}pµ POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2•CAL rAs 6�3T�5 MALUS SP. FLOWERING CRABAPPLE 2"CAL PRUNUS VIRGIANIANA'CANADA RED' CANADIAN RED 2. CAL EVERGREEN TREES PINUS PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE B' HT PREPARED FOR: PI NUS SYLVESTIS SCOTCH PINE 8' HT Williams Brothers _ Construction SHRUBS . BERBERIS KOREANA KOREAN BARBERRY 18• -- - _ 1035 Cerise Road BERBERIS THUNBERCII JAPANESE BARBERRY 18" - - CARAGANA SP. NC N 21• VSIDEW Billings,Montana 59101 ELEAGNUS NCN 21" JUNIPERUS SP. JUNIPER 1 CAL KOLKWITZIA AMABILIS BEAUTYBUSH 1B" LONICERA SPP. HONEYSUCKLE 18" - - - PHILADELPHUS SPP. MOCKORANGE 1B• - - BOULDERS ROSA RUGOSA BANANAS ROSE 15• - PROJECT: ROSA WICHURAIANA MEMORIAL ROSE 15" _ .. - _ SPLR RAIL FENCE. BARTER MEADOWS RHUS TRILOBATA FRAGRANT SUMAC 18" SPIRAEA SPP BRtDALWREATH 15' TYF•- - 'ASPEN GROVE ° LOCATION: $YRINGA WLCARIS COMMON LILAC 18" x -i \ X VIBURNUM OPOLUS HICHBUSH CRANBERRY 18" Bozeman,Montana YUCCA FRAMENTOSA ADAM'S NEEDLE 5 GAL • r \ BERM,TYP:.. TOT LOT�• \/ CROUNDCOVERS - AIUGA REPTANS CARPET BUGLE 1 GAL PLANT 36.OC LAMIUM SPP DEAD NETTLE 1 GAL PLANT 36.OC VINCA MAJOR LARGE PERIWINKLE t GAL PLANT 36"OC •- - - " VINCA MINOR PERIWINKLE 1 GAL PLANT 36"OC \ PERENNIALS % % ' ACHILLEA YARROW 1 CAL % COREOPOSIS TICKSEED 1 CAL ECHINACEA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 CAL \ GERANIUM'SP GERANIUM 1 CAL _ w °• 'Q�^"• IRIS SP IRIS 1 CAL LAVENDULA SP LAVENDER 1 CAL LIATRIS SPICATA SPIKE GAY-FEATHER 1 GAL RUDBECKIA SP CONEFLOWER 1 GAL VERONICA OFFICINAUS SPEEDWELL 1 GAL i x x X X w vrt u.� X x x x x x ACCENT TREE S'MAIL PRIVACY FENCE W1 '^ (FLOWERING CRAB) GATE,.TYP. (CEDAR OR WOOD) x X X x X - X BK FT F-- BS x �h R.•ryr<. X X B S,LF,BK,JW X INITIALS x � x x x .w. Exhibit 12° 9 —— —— — Pocket Park B&SPLIr . Detail E .GROVE BENCH SEATING LAWN,TYP. /•O . x ,p¢tin X x UTYi.B.DD + + + + + + + + + + .F + + + 10/19/01 NU BOZEL STREET M' SCALE, 1•=20'-O' -- lqw + + + + + + + + + + + + + +IL + + + +I + I I + + Ian �b I I � I � I I I I 1 I I — I zF a �OFi I / O s4 y�my mIl g s I I Ic Ea z< s + + } + + BAXTER PARKWAY + + + I I I 0 I I 99oA o �W I1Z.00 =( x � g N X i v 9 N 3 m I I I 9=��� 99pC oA I C;NOO C O0 I ba ob m5 �0 N j N s ° 5 � r !T a iv o zz o AAOtA F o To O Zz 0 00 x FFF xx i n o � c L � l r R 3 v�i �G 7�c $ ° co 6 0y0' � �2 r a a o E X M Ns � t0 fn N N `., R � Qo 8 � �� Co ' e =m 0 o 7r C,J 5 p m CL C w vi o 3 Z i F a 12'J DI WATER MAIN 4 a(DEAD MAN'S GULCH ROAD! DEAD MAN'S GULCH LEGEND LINEAR FIRE HYDRANT o PARK WETLAND H GATE VALVE 12'01 WATER MAIN OPEN SPACE w I, ERGUSON ROAD) WATER MAIN WATER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS N O WATER COURSE LIMITS HOTEL PROPERTY BOUNDARY c CONVENTION CENTER a a' O u 2 o z W a r 12'DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN W a a x LL �+ ( AVIS ROAD) Y U d (L .c C)m W Vf 4 O m 9 !O'DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN z m w W C N Q V W EOUESTRUW c�o ti o o v CENTER d AGE EN T f2AXUCRL`AI)R0)N WATER MAIN TO CONNECTION ON BAXTER LANE. 2500 FT EAST y BAXTER LANE BAXTER LANE o O COMMUNITY CENTER/ Q BED & BREAKFAST t WC G Lu W J O ~ BORHOO ao m NOTE: a ARK i ¢ ALL WATER MAINS ARE TO BE V) ui B'DUCTILE IRON UNLESS OTHERWISECr SPECIFIED. N c a c� w w PROPOSED REGIONAL PARK 12'DI WATER MAIN (DAVIS ROAD) CC • L ~ W m Q W t (OAKI WAT STREE MAIN F W W 2 Vf 300 0 300 600 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) OAK STREET OF \plotting\24x36\lto300\m.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15:25:46 1 W Q I O Q MIMIC Q LEGEND �j FIRE HYDRANT ®o GATE VALVE o Q O WATER MAIN � cr_ WATER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS N WATER COURSE LIMITS Q 0- PROPERTY BOUNDARY zz Cry v z Q W W O S LL _Z J z be U))m � om z0 O> o Q W tAm NO 3 z W W N V J 3 V F UD CEO O u EARK POCKET o W _urn 11 tj nj Inj Q 0 W fY LW W r J J� f- Q M 1-- W W O a BAXTER LANE Q� o 0 Q o 0 = Q z COMMUNITY CENTER/ W 0 � V' BED & BREAKFAST W S V 100 0 100 200 SHEET (SCALE IN FEET) w M1 OF \p1otting\24x36\1to100\ml.dgn Oct. 19. 2001 15: 30:05 W Y• Q 1 p ¢ / a i a LEGEND FIRE HYDRANT 0 1 w GATE VALVE WATER MAIN a WATER SERVICE PHASE ONE LIMITS N WATER COURSE LIMITS PROPERTY BOUNDARY = 1 z o w 0 z \ a ¢ N VETERINARY a Z Y V)m L, Om Z p O r O Qw to NO 3 Z W W V1 O J 3 V H w ir< U W f�0 U O O U EQUESTRIAN CENTER O G Q W ' W S W X� J H QM ~ W S W 0 a. a ' 4 � m Q w W W x 100 0 100 200 (SCALE IN FEET) B A X T E R LANE SHEET M2 OF \plotting\24x36\ito100\m2.dgn Oct. 19, 2001 15:30: 41 �� ::=,.,` .�, fit_ :,` °. �'��'` .3 .� .�i + �}t! � .-..'�gig-., c>�� - . ?f SS �`„� '�3 , i.• ��:. { %� � �� F ' t.�•t r � j 4: .� ' �} � �� �� � j1� ib� r.Y t�.. 1 �: • 0 a: CER TI FI CA TE OF SUR VE Y NO. LOCATED IN THE SE 114 & SW 114 OF SEC. 54, T. 1 S., R. 5 E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION �7 That part of the Southwest Ouarler and all of the Southeast Ouorter of Section 34, Township 1 South, 9 G AND NE 114 OF SEC. 3, T. S., R. 5 E. Range 5 East of P.M.M., and the Northwest Ouorter of Section 3. Township 2 South, Range 5 0 OF P.M.M., GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA East of P.M.M. Gallatin County. Montono, all described as (allows: W Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Section 3: UNPLATTED thence southerly 181' 33. 57", assumed azimuth from north, 2660.08 feel along the east line of the Northeast Ouorter of said Section 3: George E. Westlake III thence westerly 27T 07' 11"azimuth 2636.21 feet along the south line of said Northeast Ouarter; S mNP ofTay Westlake Mortinen I I thence northerly 001' 12' 19" azimuth 2640.28 felt olong the west line of said Northeast Ouarter, g Corp.P• N 112, + 110 Fm 2217 III thence westerly 269' 51' Ot" azimuth 1983.12 feel olonq the south l'ne of the Southwest Ouorter o' said Section 34; N I I 131-266 NW 1/4, SW 1/4 I I thence northerly 353' 01' 04" azimuth 249.09 feel; I thence westerly 269' 45' 45"azimuth 392.60 feet: III COS N0. 233 III thence southerly 178' 23' 34" ozimuth 246.80 feet, Kingmo Dairy Porinership I I LOT lA thence westerly 269' 5V 01" azimuth 248.65 feet along lost said south line: III 117 Fm 2776 I MINOR SUB. NO. 145A thence northerly 000' 24' 41" azimuth 1996.57 lee: along the west line of said Southwest Ouarter; III NE933'1n Robert Gene Oovde. thence easterly 089' 52' 17"azimuth 1322.67 feet along the south line of Certificate of Survey No. 233; p Z 3971.29 181 Fm 532C thence northerly 000' 22' 38" ozimuth 665.37 feet along the east line of said Certificate of Survey No. 233: N I y �_— _ thence easterlyDST 53' 19"azimuth 3971.29 feet alongthe north line of the Southwest Ouorter and the U 0 L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r4 r - - - - - - -� n ,i /��� •� r r , T ^I north line of he $oulheosl Ouorter of said 5ectlon 34: W I- Z ,' r- �� N • , Sandon L.L.C. b thence southerly 180' 15, O1" azimuth 2651.80 feel along the east line of the Southeast Quarter O o W d 168 Fm 1551 I — - of said Section 34. to the pant of beginning.` SnS rf 1 I I — Area = 20,110.770 square feet, 461.6798 acres or 1.868.351.7 square meters. Subject to existing easements. _J `` T1 j,. I I Ronald D. Aofedl CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION - - _ - - - - 98b0 11 r Mary K. Ao iedl Z n a0 t \ [Na0,x54'17"E] •,+ ; Ab'IS I'. _1 L II 11 98 Fm 2342— - (RELOCATION OF COMMON BOUNDARY) Y m Z m e^ / I ^ I „�132247 \ 1 �t 1 I — — — We certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate common boundaries between W O m Q o j 4 r \, 1!. T / f 11 I. I I I I I ' 1 I I �' I adjoining properties. Therefore this survey is exempt from review as o subdivision Z W l *• I I I� f pursuant to Section 76-3-207(i)(o),MCA. V1 N _5< N Co u Lno Cl x Lorry -I I I I rry 0. Kirkpatrick Trott 5, as shown hereon, is exempt from reJ'w as a subdivision by the Montano Deportment of Environmental C7 AGT �2 .. I Koren S. Lone Ouolily pursuant to ARM 17.36.605 (2)(b) "Oivisions made to correct errors in construction where a building, shrubs, \ t SYYY I ) -I I 9 3,31 (SS Le? 178 Fm 3809, 3811, 3813 or other permanent vegetation.may encroach)ypo Pe neighboring property." 1 F 1 9cces'J L - I _- 00 _ cc - Doted this - dny of L._-_ -_, 2 1' _'� - J7�1- r - -It s •� 1 . r Leeso Poole Anderson Timothy W. Anderson _ .I�� I iq STATE OF MONTANA _ y•g r I� — 1 r -- 1- — IT — _in) 9F �f' ' p I \ p I Irv' py I I Oscor N,Dean On this_-_Qoy oF__ _-=-_ in the year 2000. before me o Notary Public for CT 1I 1J 'Ip,QL/yy f�JJ _ J i9 L _ J L u Janis M.Oadl the.Stale of`Montono,pbrsonolly appeared Leeso Poole Anderson and Timothy W. Anderson, 0 0 F I` ' r f -I r - 1 1 9 Fm 349 known to me to be the persons whose names oet subscribed to the within instrument and n 4 r _ _ I I — — 46 Fm 2632C acknowledged to me that they executed the some. n witness whereof, .5 S; 7. 98 crest o I I I I 1I I I I I II I I 1 hove hereunto set my hohd and ofGxed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. 1 residing o1 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE 0 MONTANA my commisson expires a`f39- - - 1 r_ - -1 r - 1 r 1 I + W.B.C., L.P. a Montano Limited Partnership R 1 1• //� . _ I I Dian E.R s -y-1 - _ By: J.G.W., Inc.. a Montana Corporation, \• I C , , I/y f-� T I I I Ben w-R ens 1 1 - - General Partner of W.B.C., L.P. y 6 3/S F ! I ` , [ _ 1 'L. �F\_:i I- �J L _ 23 Fm 10427 Doted,this- --'QpY of- -----. 2000. 31 l 6ZugL'J L ( l-1 r- t0819I50 3b� i STATE OF MONTANA' �. Gerold R. Williams, President, J.G.W., Inc. O r. [N0436' I•, ` ' -,�pgop Dianne Peterson 24.9759 A res I I �r 1 Wmiom R.Peterson( t -t COUNTY;thii;99. _.• I•v - 1 1 240.09 J 22 Fm 961 On chi}TT,1 tloy o4r- ---_ in the yea s20G0, before me o Notary Public for J L- 10. I ii - the Statrf,,o,•Montano,•personally appeared Gerald R. WJFoms, presdent of J.C.W.. Inc., o Montana Corporation, "kn0 to-me'to be tht person whose name + within instrument and acknowledged to me _ �utdkr�bed to the — -. - '^ tJ1` hereuntd set m bond and dflixed m anti srnd corporation. In witness whereof, W E 19!l312 -) A -( �- - nacho.he execulad the same, for and on behalf of I I , F = ova Y y, C!�sell the day and year in this certificate first above written. 'J .•. 4 residing at �I I -NOTARY PUB FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA my commission expires (Npt I I ILIC; `W 4705 I ' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR r III I y ' � x I, Mork A. Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby Certify that between H Mar. 22 and Sept.-, 2000, this survey was made by me and that this map correctly represents ~ M said survey and thot it conforms to the current Montora Subdivision and Plotting Act, Sections U W 76-3-101 through 76-3-625 M.C.A.. and the Collotir County Subdivision Regulations U O 73 S Dated this _-!_ doy or _---_--, 2000. a 1 1 Mark A. Chandler - — — — I — — — — � — — — � — — — — — — `.1 534 Acres;-._ — — hl�y— I � :."' Montano Registration No. 9518E5 —'� — I I r CE5d`.�1CATE OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1, I I a f7Fj, ' UNPLATTED 111 Z I I UNPLATTED I, the Chairman of.Itx Board of County Commissioners, Gallatin County. Montano, do hereby certify Vesta Fern Anderson III , % L Limited that the use of,the exemption claimed on the occomponying Certificate of Survey has been duly reviewed and I _ I Partnership has been found•to con 94-81 form to the requirements of lne Subdivision and Plotting W. Section 76-3-101 O Mary Catherine Nelson I I Y et. seq.. M.CA, and the Gallatin County Subdivision Regulations. Z Morie C. Baxter III NE 1 4, IS l \ J _ I - ------- 154 Fm 749-751 i Life Estate I I Doled this _ day of _ 2000. •I I - Chairman, Board of County Commissioners 7a-534 I I COS N0. 1302 (REM.) M 2 Fm 1014 diet. 111 Douglas Lance Smith rt y 142 Fm 69 I I (,ERTIFICTE OF COUNTY TREASURER W(, 1. � A T, 4j`5 I. I 1. Jeff Krauss, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montano, do hereby certify that the accompanying S I Certificate of Survey has been duly examined and )het all real properly taxes and special assessments x t I assessed and le.ed on the land to be divided have Seen paid. U.1 W N4;,3n I Doted this ___4_ day of _-__--__, 2000. By: - Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County r 2=.21 I I F II I (Nap+,r,Y4pwyy� I " I I I, 'f° CLERK AND RECORDER • ' I I o I I I 1, Shelley Vance. Clerk and Recorder of Gollotin Courty. Montano. do hereby certify that SHEET d UNPLATTED w UNPLATTED the foregoing instrument was filed in my office at _- o'clock __.M. this -- day of I I Jo on Lewis 1/2 I oN I TR I A I I William H. and Betty --------- A.D., 2000, and recorded as Cerlificote of Survey No. _---_, McDonald Land COS N0. 2007 Anne Sipple Trust records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montono. 400 400 800 Company limited o 153 Fm 775 Partnership 1/2 1 0 1 I I Document Number ---_--_, ey. (SCALE IN FEET) I 132 Fm 4365 I I I Deputy Clerk and Recorder OF