Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300224843665358) \.. 5 ry' � it * �•iSwe;�� �r.,ow�.t•+� -� d :r r�� 43 t: \ .. p ♦Yb �W�y I \ \ �� �' A i- � i 411 f ;'1 G tiafrL tV} J r k r i 204 Baxter Meadows • BrothersWiNams • • October 29, 2001 h' .yX.. r r«. t'..I 'r ,\r•_ ,":i�i'[^C4',0._,.i.A±�i./. �"-'.",1�7�u 4.`rs-^A T'':c".,v... etr .1 . f •S'�'., �,t �yVt�. 1 FILE REVIEW SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT File Name: �����5 I�R<�:�►���tc� File No.: Z -01,3 0 F Reference Files: DATE DATE DONE DUE DONE BY DRC initial week review DRC second week review DRC final week review Notice to paper (not <15 or >45 days prior to CC ) S Notice to Adjoiners (not <10 days prior to final DRC) Post notice (not <10 days prior to final DRC) (Q Staff Report to City Commission City Commission work session City Commission hearing - Approval letter mailed to Applicant Improvements Agreement mailed to Applicant approved approved w/ conds denied date DRC Action CC Action Final Site Plan due by: Improvements Agreement returned: Final Site Plan approved on: Financial Guarantee received on: Financial Guarantee released on: Date of Temporary Occupancy: Date of Final Occupancy: SO2� CITY F, - BOZEMAN 'It DEP ENT OF 9x PLANNING AND CC3MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 7r�A►CO. � Mailing address:. P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net October 16, 2001 R. Dale Beland, LLC 2023 Stadium Way, Suite 2B Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Meadows: Subdivision PUD #P-0128 and Zoning PUD #Z-01204' Dear Dale: Following is the review schedule which has tentatively been set up for Baxter Meadows Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Plan applications. REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR BAXTER MEADOWS PRELIM PLAN AND PLAT REVIEWING DATES NUMBER OF PACKET DUE AGENCY PACKETS DATE DRC/AGENCIES 10-30 (9:00) 7 + Agencies* 10-25 DRB 10-30 (3:00) 8 + 6 Staff Reports** 10-25 PLANNING BOARD 11-6 (Prel Plat 9 + 6 Staff Reports** 10-31 only) (7:00 .m.) CITY COMMISSION 11-19 (7:00 10 + 6 Staff Reports 1144 . .m.) and PB Resolutions • Please advise us as to which agencies should have a packet sent to them------4> ** In addition, we need Staff Reports (SR) for each applicant, owner. We take care of mailing the SR's to them. If you have questions, please call or e-mail. Sincerely, Carol OCT 2 2 2001 J -------------------- planning• zoning subdivision review annexation historic preservation housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination FILE REVIEW SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT File Name: � �� Fit �J File No.: � 1 0� `t Reference'Files: 0/ DATE DATE DONE DUE DONE BY DRC initial week review DRC second week review ��� 0—3Z) DRC final week review Notice to paper (not <15 or >45 days prior to CC ) Notice to Adjoiners (not <10 days prior to final DRC) j 0 Post notice (not <10 days prior to final DRC) Staff Report to City Commission City Commission work session City Commission hearing Approval letter mailed to Applicant Improvements Agreement mailed to Applicant approved approved w/ conds denied date DRC Action CC Action Final Site Plan due by: Improvements Agreement returned: Final Site Plan approved on: Financial Guarantee received on: Financial Guarantee released on: Date of Temporary Occupancy: Date of Final Occupancy: 1 PROJECT ACTIVITY LOG CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NAME: FILE NO.: /aD DATE ACTIVITY STAFF STAFF CUMUL. PERSON HOURS HOURS UA r 22-141 50 SHEETS • �� ���®, 22-142 100 SHEETS • 22-144 200 SHEETS MENEM EMMIME MMMMMMMMMMMMMMNMMMMM ■■N■■ NONE ■M■■■M■MMM■■■■■ MEN MEN mommm iiiiiiiimm MENEM ■■■■M��■■■�����M■■■■EM■■M M■■MO M■■ME Building Division; ---�� fCZTY�'O BO �UILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS RESIDENTLALX COMMERCIAL_SQUARE FOOTAGE VALUATION S SITE ADDRESS: Bet.e 3$t`3(o �9U�3-�ti`' r�J NEAREST CROSS STREET Equestrian Lane PROJECT OR BUSINESS NAME: Baxter eadows EMAIL kthorson@baxtermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SJSWJ SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP 1S LOT 28 BLOCK 22 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406=896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development,:'.LP PHONE 582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOWSN N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SFD ' 0 INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WA OSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): IXCITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC DOTHER No building or other structure shall be erected,moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits.'This APPLICATION forrn is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a sipature. Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the delay or revocation of building,and/or occupancy permits. 7 SIGNED D DATE Z-%h O 3 \� OR DEPARTMENTAL, USE ONLY WOW THIS LWE ITT; ,P,LAiiNNING.D.EPARMENTOVA PROVED ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ( )APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ( )DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT O APPROVED { j DISAPPROVED &O COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED () DISAPPROVED O STREET./SANITATION O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN.COUNTY ROAD OFFICE ( )APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( )APPROVED ( )DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what is require o reme the efg DEPARMENTAL SIGMA URE DATE O IMPACT FEE COORDINATOR ( j APPROVED () DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE ' Building Division DE?ARTir,f�E-?AART�i���10�" s! CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DIVISION OdD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS RESIDENTIAL X COMMERCIAL;SQU.ARE FOOTAGE VALUATION S SITE ADDRESS: �� "re i l NEAREST CROSS STREET Middle KI ley PROJECT OR BUSINESS'NAibZE: BaxteV Meadows EMAIL kthorson@baxtermeiidows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S$SW SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP 1 S LOT 29 BLOCK 22 SUBDIVISION. Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAM EiADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT . ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME NSA PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE .PROJECT DESCRIPTION SFD aF�p�.yh INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): ECITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES . OWELL/SEPTIC OOTHER No building or other structure shall be erected,moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a signature.Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the delay or revocation of building a e —upancy permits. SIGNED � .DATE OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BytLOW THIS LINEI 1-11 -. P,lA�ININGpDEPAR1v1EN�I " PROVED ()DISAPPROVED GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT ()APPROVED .()DISAPPROVED O COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED 9-ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O STREET/SANITATION ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE ()APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED• If disapproved, what is required v the eficieng DEPARMENTAL SIGNA RE DATE O IMPACT FEE COORDI ATOR O APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1. Call to Order = 6:00 p.m. 2. Pledge,of Allegiance and Moment of Silence 3. Minutes - January 18, 2000, January 30, 2001, and January 12 and January 14, 2002 O4 Consent Items - a. Approval of final plat to create new Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Babcock and Davis Addition-Jackson Minor Subdivision(northwest corner of East Davis Street and North Ida Avenue) (P-0139) (JM) Authorize Mayor to sign -Findings of Fact and Order- preliminary plat of Baxter Meadows, Phase I, Planned Unit Development Subdivision (subdivide 64.66 acres into residential/mixed use lots - part of the SW% and all of the SE% of Section 34, T1 S, RSE, and the NE% of Section 3, T2S, RSE, MPM for mixed use development)(portion of phased subdivision bounded by Davis Lane,future Oak Street, Harper Puckett Road and future Deadman's Gulch) (P-0123) C. Claims Motion and vote to approve, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the necessary actions 5. Request from Dab Dabney, Farmhouse Partners, for letter of endorsement from the City Commission for tax credit application for Bridge Apartments Presentation; discussion; motion and vote 6. Request from Jay Bentley, for letter of endorsement from the City Commission for tax credit application for Willow Wood Village Presentation; discussion; motion and vote 7. Request for permission to cut street for installation of sewer service lines for the proposed Marantha Apartments at 321 West Peach Street (DA) Presentation; discussion; motion and vote 8. Request for Commission approval of wetlands mitigation for Rose Park (JG) Discussion; possible motion and vote City Commission meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Ron Brey, at 582-2306 (TDD 582-230 1). Page 1 of 3 aft -Building Division — CITY OF BOZEMAN BUIEDINGIDh6Y0N BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR­REVIEW}OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS RESIDENTIALX COMMERCIAL_SQUARE FOOTAGE VALUATION S A1 SITE ADDRESS: &L � 9 g$'� / NEAREST CROSS STREET Bosal Street PROJECTOR BUSINESS_NAME: Baxter Meadows EMAIL kthorson@baxtermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S}SW SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP IS LOT 31 BLOCK 22 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION. _ SFD 58 — �,r� S r►c ca vt _ INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): ®CITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC ❑OTHER No building or other structure shall be erected,moved,added to or structurally altered wif-iout valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a signature. Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the delay or re ocation ofbuildi g and/or occupancy permits. SIGNED DATE Ar - oo-3 OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BELOW THIS LINE! IT"Z'-PL?,i" IIiPP; V�F._.,-,^ "Y10 ()APPROVED .()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ()APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT . O APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED -COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT. ()APPROVED •( )DISAPPROVED O COUNTY FOOD SERVICE ( )APPROVED ( )DISAPPROVED ENGINEERING.DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED. ()DISAPPROVED STREET./SANITATION ( )APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE ( j APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( )APPROVED ( ) DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what.is required to rpnek the de iciency Nes)? DEPARIVIENTAL SIGNATU DATE I O IMPACT FEE COORDINATOR (j APPROVED O DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE Section 18.30.050 (Yards), to omit yard requirements; and Section 18.30.060 (Building Height),to increase maximum building height to 72'. Section 18.49 (Landscaping), to landscape in accordance with the submitted plan. Section 18.50.060.D (Watercourse Setback), to decrease minimum to 35' along both sides. Section 18.50.080 (Street elision Triangle), to measure from the bulb-out curb line. Section 18.50.1101 (Parking Requirements): To reduce the total number of parking spaces required by basing the requirement of 1.72 spaces per 1,000 s.f. net floor area; To locate required parking spaces in the public right-of-way; therefore, to not provide parking spaces that are maintained by ownership, easement and/or lease for and during the life of the respective uses; and To count on-street parking spaces as a portion of the required off-street parking spaces. Section 18.50.1103.5 (Parking Requirements), to allow backing into the public rights-of-way. Section 18.50.100.A (Public Street Frontage), to allow lots that don't abut for at least 25-feet on a public street. Section 18.50.120 (Off-street loading berth requirements), to allow the use of alleys for loading. Subdivision Relaxations Section 16.14.020 (Center), to decrease street frontage to less than 50% of perimeter. Section 16.14.030.F (Depth of Lots), to increase average depth to greater than 3 times average width. Section 16.14.030.H (Frontage on Public Streets), to decrease frontage on a public street to 0'. Section 16.14.040 (Blocks), to increase block length to more than 400'. Section 16.14.060 (Utility Easements), to allow association-owned easements. Section 16.14.090 (Mail Delivery),to deferred until routes extended. Section 16.14.100.E (Park Requirement), to decrease street frontage to less than 50% of perimeter. Section 16.14.110 (Landscaping of Public Rights-of-Way): Trees, plants and ground cover. To omit landscaped boulevards. Section 16.14.170 (Watercourse Setback), to decrease minimum to 35' along both sides. Section 16.16.080 (Paving Requirements): to allow private streets that do not meet City public street standards. Section 16.16.090 (Improvement Standards): 90' right of way width for local with XX' back of curb to back of curb and 102' rijzht of waywidth idth for collector with XX' back of curb to back of curb. To allow private streets that do not meet City public street standards; including but not limited to greater ri hits-of-way widths of 90' and 102', no boulevards, wider sidewalks, and diagonal parking. Zoning Relaxations Section 18.20.030 (Lot Area and Width), to decrease minimum lot area to between 2,432 - 3,168 sq. ft. and decrease minimum lot width to between 25' - 48% Section 18.20.040 (Lot Coverage), to increase maximum lot coverage to between 46% - 55%; and Section 18.20.050 (Yards), to decrease minimum front yard to between 10' - 14' and to decrease minimum rear yard to between 2' - 5'. Section 18.30.030 (Lot Area and Width), to decrease minimum lot width to 46% Section 18.30.040 (Lot Coverage), to omit lot coverage requirements; December 15, 2003 Mr. Dave Skelton Senior Planner City of Bozeman 20 E. Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: Plan Change—Block 3 / Lot 20 Mr. Skelton, Per you reques , ere is the information regarding the change in plans for the above referenced 1 . erry Willi re uested John Rosa build a single level house on this lot to preser t view the Tra tional house. It was decided that the mirrored plan V 1B - M wor ed est is lot. John osa y illiams Cc:JW,MSM Reviewed & Approved For Zoning Compliance Ci of man nning unity De opment • - 21 - North 19th Avenue to the entrance to the project, caused by project construction activities, shall be repaired by the applicant. The applicant shall agree to repair any damage within one week of notification by the City that repairs are required. The applicant shall post a bond of$ 10,000, or other security acceptable to the City, with the City to assure that the work is completed. 74. Any unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 75. The landowner agrees to provide the City with a payback of$15,000 per the payback schedule dated May 10, 2001, for the North 19th Avenue/Baxter Lane signalization. Of this total payback, the landowners agree to pay$2,072 to the City prior to final plat approval for Phase 1 of the development. 76. That the developer submit a boundary line adjustment for Phase 1 along the southem edge of the equestrian center (northern edge of Riata Road) which will become part of the final plat application. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost, and Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none. Public Hearinq - Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development-Baxter Meadows Planned Unit Development, Phase 1, to allow for 65-acre mixed use development to include up to 156 residential dwelling units (Z-01204) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, Baxter Meadows Planned Unit Development, Phase 1, to allow for a 65-acre mixed use development to include up to 156 residential dwelling units, as requested under application Z-01204. Mayor Youngman opened the public hearing. Dale Beland presented an overview of this application, noting as of the writing of the staff report, the Planning Office has received no public opposition to this project. Commissioner Kirchhoff asked if this application meets the 30 percent PUD open space requirement; is the developer using the 100-acre park as part of that calculation? Mr. Kreager responded that upon approval of the 100-acre park, the open space requirement will be met. If the 100-acre park is not approved, the entire 30 percent will be made up in other phases of development. Commissioner Kirchhoff pointed out the 100-acre park will be sold, so that cannot be counted as a part of the 30-percent open space requirement. Mr. Kreager answered that if the 100-acres is removed,they will average 24 percent additional open space for every phase of development. Commissioner Kirchhoff stated his concern that the required 30-percent open space is not being met. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Youngman closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Kirchhoff, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, Baxter Meadows Planned Unit Development, Phase 1 to allow for a 65-acre mixed use development to include up to 156 residential dwelling units be approved with the following conditions: 1. The homeowners' association documents shall be recorded and filed at the Gallatin County Clerk& Recorder's Office with the final plat and prior to final site plan approval for the residential/mixed use planned unit development. 2. The landscape plan shall be prepared and certified by a landscape architect, nurseryperson or equally certified professional, and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to final site plan approval. 11-19-2001 40 - 22 - 3. The developer shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City of Bozeman to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of submitting for final P.U.D. plan review and approval. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and method of security shall be made a part of said Agreement. 4. If occupancy of structures is to occur prior to the installation of all on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine(9)months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 5. Building permits may not be issued until the final subdivision plat and final site plan have been approved and all required infrastructure and street improvements for said residential subdivision have been installed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman; unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under provisions of Ordinance Nos. 1532 and 1533 for concurrent construction. 6. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia &Associates, dated October 2001, shall be updated and made a part of the application materials submitted for approval of each and all subsequent phases of subdivision. 7. All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of-way and provisions for bicyclists, shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update, with the exception of Latigo Avenue and Bozel Street, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. The street section for Latigo Avenue and Bozel Street (as shown on Baxter Meadow Phase 1 Exhibit"C", date 11/14/01) is approved by the City Commission as a variation. 8. The applicant's proposal to allow primary vehicular lot access off alleys shall require that the City Commission grant a variation to the lot access(frontage)standards in the City Code. Snow removal responsibility in alleys used as primary vehicular access to lots shall be private. 9. The applicant's proposal to allow variations from Chapters 18.12 and 18.20 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (lot area, lot width, coverage, etc.), as described in Exhibit "I", shall require approval by the City Commission. 10. A Stormwater Master Plan for the planned unit development for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater-receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information(particularly for the basin site,drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. 11-19-2001 - 23 - 1- While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the final site plan for each lot and/or phase. 11. The final site plan shall coordinate the proposed landscaping with the proposed water and sewer utilities in a manner acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 12. The applicant is advised that the water and sewer infrastructure required for each phase of development shall be subject to further review. 13. The preliminary plan shows public sidewalks crossing onto Town Home lots. The final plan shall identify such sidewalks and show proposed easements. The final plat for each phase shall grant access easements to the public at these locations. 14. The applicant shall submit seven (7) copies of the final site plan and supplemental documentation containing the streetscape profiles, architectural design, building footprint, elevations, floor plans, and landscape features prior to final site plan approval. 15. The applicant shall submit written narrative with the final P.U.D. plan outlining how each of the conditions of approval has been addressed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, and Mayor Youngman. Those voting No, none. Adiournment - 11:15 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Kirchhoff, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and.No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Brown, and Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none. MARCIA B. YOUNGMAN, Mayor ATTEST: ROBIN L. SULLIVAN Clerk of the Commission PREPARED BY: KAREN L. DeLATHOWER Deputy Clerk of the Commission 11-19-2001 Carol Schott To: Dale Beland Subject: RE: Baxter Meadows Dale, At that rate, the applicant may not have submitted enough money for the review fees. The PUD/CUP is $660.00 + $6 for each residential unit [146 (or 147, if B&B is included)X $6 = $876.001 + whatever square footage of floor area divided by 1000, multiplied by $4. Or $1, 536.00 + the SF fee. The Subdivision PUD is $200.00 + $3 per lot up to 100, then $1 per lot over 100 + $5 per adjoiner. [$200 + $300 + $50 + $115 = $665.001 So the fees should have been $2,201 without the SF fee for leasable, non-residential floor area. At this point, the applicant will probably be required to submit the maximum floor area that could be constructed on the commercial use lots. What do you think? The check from WBC was for $2, 354 .00. -----Original message----- From: Dale Beland [mailto:rdaleb4@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 8 :03 AM To: Carol Schott Cc: cmetzler@baxtermeadows.com Subject: Baxter Meadows Carol: There were 23 adjoining property owner notices mailed, to include the entire 460 project area. By copy of this message, I ask Claudia Metzler to respond to your question as -o the calculation of the application fees paid. Dale Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. . http://careers.yahoo.com 1 V� Bo. CITY 0 BOZEMAN • V 'It9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 Co yo.?� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net October 25, 2001 . Jerry Williams, President WBC LP 1035 Cerise Road Billings, MT 59191 Re: Baxter Meadows Project: Phase I PUD Preliminary Plan & Preliminary Subdivision Plat Dear Jerry: Our review of the subject applications received by the Planning Office on October 23, 2001, and subsequent meetings with City staff and your project team, conclude that the applications do not yet meet minimum submittal requirements outlined in the Bozeman zoning and subdivision regulations. Accordingly, these initial applications are deemed incomplete. The specific items that need to be addressed have been described in the review memos that you received from Beland (10/24/01) and Morrison-Maierle, Inc. (10/25/01), and were further discussed with your team today. Because we understand your intention to upgrade this material and re-submit as new applications as soon as possible, we will not return the application materials nor refund the fees at this time. We will retain them in the Planning Office for your reuse. Given the "fast track"process assigned to the Baxter Meadows project; we encourage you to continue working on the new preliminary plat map and related submittal materials. We understand that the traffic impact analysis, preliminary drainage report, detailed preliminary water design report, revised street sections and others items discussed at today's meeting will be forthcoming as part of a new submittal. City staff and consultants are committed to a timely review and preparation of staff reports with recommended conditions just as soon as we receive the complete applications materials. Our goal is to complete the staff/DRC/DRB/Planning Board review process in time to accommodate the City Commission hearing now scheduled for November 19, 2001. Staff is willing to request the Planning Board to re-schedule their hearing from November 6 to November 13. However, we cannot confirm this schedule until we receive an applications package that provides sufficient information about the project to allow an adequate review. planning• zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination As discussed at the concept plan DRC meeting., your applications must confirm your intention to utilize the "fast track"process defined by Bozeman Ordinance# 1532 and 1533, to allow concurrent installation of infrastructure improvements and project construction. Also, you must describe how you intend to meet the criteria defined in the ordinances. We note that the application material requirements for the preliminary PUD plan and the preliminary subdivision plat, as described in Section 18.50.060 and in Section 16.08.030 of the Subdivision Regulations, are similar. The concurrent review process for PUD development provides an opportunity for submittal of this information to serve both zoning and subdivision review. Please contact our consultants, Beland and Morrision-Maierle, Inc., if you have any questions. Sincerely, Andrew C. Epple, Al P Director of Planning& Community Development Cc: Phill Forbes, Morrision-Maierle, Inc. R. Dale Beland LLC Craig Brawner,P.E. Bob Murray, P.E. Clark Johnson, City Manager Baxter Meadows prelim application 102501.doc 2 Io12,l7Gi-y3� ® MORRISON Ell--In MAIERLE, INC. memo . An Empinree-Oa-ned Company TO: Craig Brawner, P.E. Bob Murray, P.E. Andy Epple, AICP R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP Gary Swanson, P.E. Jerry Williams FROM: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. RE: Baxter Meadows Preliminary Plat Application DATE: October 25, 2001 The preliminary plat application packet received October 23, 2001 has been reviewed to determine compliance with the minimum submittal requirements outlined in the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations that specifically relate to infrastructure and survey issues. It is our opinion that the following items need to be addressed to meet the minimum requirements of the regulations: (All sections referenced below are from the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations or City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise noted.) 1. Preliminary Plat - All information listed in 16.08.020 A, B, C, D; F, G and 16.08.030 B, C, D, E, F, G, and H needs to be on the preliminary plat drawing. The minimum scale required is 1" = 100', you might want to consider a larger scale, i.e. 1" = 50' due to the density of the development. While all of the requirements need to be addressed, the following items are obviously missing: a. Adjoining tract lines and references to Certificate of Surveys and/or deeds. b. Width of proposed streets and easements. c. Location of all existing buildings, power lines, towers and other improvements inside and within 100 feet of the subdivision. d. Zoning classification within and adjacent to the subdivision. e. Topographic features including water courses, drainage channels, areas of seasonal water ponding, marsh areas, wetlands and wooded areas. f. Existing and proposed utilities. g. Additional detail to describe unusual shaped lots such as corner lots adjacent to alleys. r� ; h. Right of way width. i. Easements (existing and proposed) location width and purpose including water, sewer, phone, gas, power CATV etc. Also refer to Section 16.14.050 A, B and C. j. Dimensions and areas for common areas, parks, and other public areas. k. Sites for uses other than single family residences need to be noted as such. I. Title block with required location information. m. Addresses of owners and subdividers. n. For all streets and alleys the width of the right of way, grades, and curvature. o. Adjoining owners. p. Perimeter survey of the exterior boundary of the proposed platted area. q. The approximate location of section corners or legal subdivision corners of sections pertinent to the subdivision boundary. r. Contours at a 2 foot interval. s. Normally the draft certificates required on the final plat are shown on the preliminary plat, the regulations allow for this information to be shown on the plat or provided as a separate document. t. It is advised that the watercourse setbacks noted in Section 16.14.130 be noted on the preliminary plat. u. It is suggested that the perimeter of the plat be extended to the edge of the right of way along the north side of Equestrian Lane. Why is the east boundary line of the plat located in the future right of way for Baxter Parkway. 2. Preliminary Plat Survey Issue - Per Section 16.10.050 the preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor licensed to practice in Montana. 3. Storm water issues a. Discussions in the pre-application stage indicated the desire to place detention ponds on public park land, if this is desired it needs to be shown in this application so the governing body can approve it per Section 16.14.090 G.1. b. A preliminary drainage report is required per Section 18.54.060 B. f. — - 4. Community Impact Report a. Water Supply—A detailed preliminary water design report is needed for the review of this project. Two critical component of the C II water design report are to establish preliminary line sizes and to demonstrate that adequate water can be provided to the project. Since the project is outside or partially outside of the water facility plan service boundary this item is crucial for the review o the project. Refer to Section 16.18.050 A. 1., 2., 3., and 4. for specific requirements for the water supply issue. b. Sewage Disposal — Refer to Section 16.18.05 B. 1., 2., and 3. for specific requirements to be noted in the report. A preliminary design report needs to be completed to examine the needed line sizes. c. The street and road section may need additional information after reviewing the Traffic Study. It is unclear in the application what roads and portions thereof will be constructed as part of this phase. d. Section 3.4.6 of the application indicates that the roads will be maintained by the City of Bozeman and the Homeowners Association. The maintenance that each entity is to perform needs to be clearly identified in this section. 5. The improvements proposed with this phase need to be clearly identified somewhere in the application. This could be in narrative from or shown on the sewer, water and street drawings. 6. The information in the "fast track" ordinances needs to be added to the application if concurrent construction is proposed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Phill Forbes or James Nickelson at 587-0721. ' Enclosure z' R. DALE BELAND, LLC PLANNING CONSULTANT 2023 STADIUM DRIVE, SUITE 2 B BOZEMAN, MT 59715 October 24, 2001 Jerry Williams, President WBC LP 1035 Cerise Road Billings, MT 59191 Re: Baxter Meadows- Phase I PUD Preliminary Plan & Preliminary Plat Review Dear Jerry: Following my receipt of a copy of these applications last Sunday afternoon, I noted several items that need to be addressed by additions to these applications in order to allow a meaningful review. I briefly discussed these with Gary Swanson when he delivered 20 sets of the applications to my office yesterday afternoon at 4:00 PM. Given the schedule for DRC and DRB meetings on Tuesday, 10/30/01, it is critical that we receive this additional information as soon as possible. My quick review has identified the following items: Preliminary Major Subdivision Plat: 1. Written description of response to requirements of Ordinances# 1052 and # 153 for concurrent installation of improvements and project construction. 2. Traffic study. 3. Water and sewer studies? 4. Preliminary platting certificate as prepared by a Montana title company. 5. Certified list of adjoining property owners, their mailing addresses and property descriptions, including property owners across public r/w and/or easements. (Note- I used the three addresses provided by Peccia to mail hearing notices). 6. Approximate survey of exterior boundaries (of Phase I) with bearings, distances and curve data as appropriate. 7. Streets, roads, alleys and easements, width of r/w, grades, and curvature of each. 8. Names of adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining COSs. 9. Approximate locations of all section corners or legal subdivisions corners of sections pertinent to the subdivision boundary. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING FOR GROWTH POLICY AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 1 406-582-0050,FAX 582-0040 i� �, . C • ,., Y •r• . . ... s,. .�., • .. ... • ... , , . ,,,1::I f` ,. . . C � u � .. , . i. ._ • t , � - .. .'r .'� S_Y' .•''• . . ' 1 r , .. ;f 1'. t i . � •. 10. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope if under 10%, at 5-foot intervals if slope is between 10%and 15%, and at 10 feet if slope is 15% or greater. 11. All appropriate certificates (refer to Chapter 16.32). 12. Written statement describing requested variance and facts of hardship upon which the request is based(refer to Chapter 16.30). 13.Notation or explanation of 140 lots vs. 156 dwelling units(including condo units). 14. Written explanation of how the fire protection requirements of Chapter 16.14.060 will be met. 15. Draft Covenants, Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners' Association. 16. Draft provision for maintenance of all roads,parks, and other required improvements. 17. Draft public improvements agreement and guarantee. 18. Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District effective upon preliminary plat approval and during construction of improvements. Preliminary PUD Plan: 1. Written response to Item 1.E.5 of checklist(re Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100). 2. Number and location of off-street parking etc. (per Item 2.0 of checklist). 3. Owner's certification of ownership(Per Item EE of checklist). 4. Traffic impact analysis(noted in preliminary plat review). Further review may identify other items, but I believe these are the important ones. Please come to the review meetings prepared to answer these concerns. If you need further background,just call. Sincerely, R. Dale Beland AIA, AICP Cc: Andy Epple AICP, Director of Planning &Community Development Phill Forbes- M&M Baxter Meadows prelim data needs 102301.doc COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING FOR GROWTH POLICY AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2 406-582-0050.FAX 582-0040 !1' a. tit•.. .. .. .. .... �� ♦;:1 1" .. .. .l � .., .� a ..1.-A . 1. }� .A. r=' r �z .... r ' ( �• ^•l; �) 1. .1:.;'i:'•, t; '•r CMRA BOZEMAN IENT OF PLANNING AND COUNITY DEVELOPMENT V 9� Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 co rp?� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net October 23, 2001 To: . DRC/DRB members, reviewing agencies Fr: R. Dale Beland AIA, AICP; Staff Consultant Re: BAXTER MEADOWS-Phase I PUD Preliminary Plan &Preliminary Plat Cc: Andy Epple AICP; Director of Planning & Community Development Blair Stone, Mithun Gary Swanson, Peccia& Associates John Myles, Williams Brothers Phill Forbes, Morrison & Maierle The attached application binders are submitted for your review prior to the following scheduled meetings: . DRC- Tuesday, 10/30/01- 9:00 AM- Commission meeting room; and DRB- Tuesday, 10/30/01- 3:00 PM- Commission meeting room. Given the previous intensive reviews of this project, the scheduled meetings will complete the review process. This application material will be supplemented by additional information to be presented by the applicant at the review meetings. However, I believe that we have sufficient data to allow a meaningful review and maintain the "fast track"process. (For your reference, I enclose a copy of the consolidated comments on the concept plans, and the response from Mithun.) Your prompt attention to this material is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please call me at 582-0050. Baxter Meadows Phase I prelim review 102301.doc planning• zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination SED 1 5 2001 Baxter Meadows Response to Staff Comments 9/7/2001 C 5Y ry rT4UN) Concern 9. In order to comply with the 2001 Transportation Plan, we propose to widen Ferguson's ROW from 80' to 90'. The additional 10' would come from 5' behind back edge of sidewalk. Concern 10. We will change the Residential ROW to 60'. In order to maintain a neo- traditional streetscape we would propose to add V of ROW behind the sidewalks. We would like to keep the Neighborhood Green ROW at 42'. This would allow a 10' one- way traveling lane and a 7' on-street parking area. These dimensions are similar to other streets throughout the neighborhood. We will change the Equestrian Court to provide. two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for on-street guest parking, therefore we will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. Concern 11. The traffic-calming device on Baxter would be designed as a traffic circle and not a round-about. We agree that a round about is engineered to manage the merging of very large traffic volumes. Our goal is to slow down traffic speeds along Baxter. This neo-traditional neighborhood has been designed with homes fronting on Baxter Lane. We strongly believe that defining the character of Baxter Lane early with a traffic- calming device will provide for a safer pedestrian-oriented streetscape for the neighborhood. We will change reference from round-about to traffic circle. A report from Institute of.Transportation Engineers (ITE)District 6,July 20-23, 1997 reported that in addition to reducing accidents,they found traffic circles are effective at reducing vehicle speed without reducing significantly reducing traffic volume. We would like to see the bike path on the south side of Baxter Lane allowing possible connections and increasing its relationship with the Regional Park System. In addition, we feel that this is a safer location for the bike trail because the trail would cross fewer intersections. Concern 12. We are proposing a 20-alley row with 24' clearance between units. In addition we will maintain an 18' interior radius to allow proper maneuverability for garbage trucks. Concern 14. We feel that the location of the traffic circle is in the proper location. Our goal is to calm traffic along Baxter Lane and increase safety for children and other residents. In addition,eve do not want to discourage traffic along Davis Road by placing a traffic calming devo on Baxter and Davis. Concern 15. Inside the residential neighborhood we advocate that sidewalks and bike paths be shared. It distances the bicyclist from the traveling automobile and provides a safer environment for children. However, we realize the need for the serious biker who relies on a bike path system as a primary mode of transportation. We will provide bike lanes along larger roads like Davis and Baxter. • In response to a letter dated 9/12/01: Streets: The reason the road servicing the Traditional Homes does not connect to Baxter Lane is to allow a green belt and a horse trail connection to the equestrian open space. In addition, the dead end road will be 150' or less to accommodated proper fire truck access while not requiring a cul-de-sac. One-way road we will add comments We will increase.Ferguson's ROW to 90", however we will be.requesting a deviation from providing a bike lane on both sides of Ferguson. We would like to, as much as possible,maintain a neighborhood/pedestrian scale on Ferguson. We fell that providing an additional bike lane and increasing the width and pavement of Ferguson would deviate from a neo-traditional development. Also in order to maintain the proper scale of Ferguson, we would rather not provide a 1' center strip down the center of the road. In Phase One, single family and town house units are planned along Baxter Lane. We narrowed the driving lanes to 10' to reduce the traffic speed and increase safety along Baxter Lane. We strongly feel that 10' driving lanes and a traffic circle will benefit the neighborhood from both an aesthetics and safety point of view. Please see additional response to Concern 11 above. Street sections E and D are designed as country roads. In these areas the neighborhood transitions towards the equestrian area. We are proposing a 20-alle; row with 24' clearance between units. In addition we will maintain an 18' interior radius to allow proper maneuverability for garbage trucks. We will change the Equestrian Court to provide two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for guest on-street parking. We will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. We will change street section G to 60'. In order to maintain a neo-traditional streetscape we would propose to add 1' of ROW behind the sidewalks. Alley Garbage Standards we will add comments Street Section 1 we will add comments We will change the Equestrian Court to provide two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for on-street guest parking. We will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. �' • • �l Davis Street—►ve will add comments The equestrian area will have secondary access via a gravel road. The maintenance of roads and alleys we will add comments Please see response to Concern 11. L September 19, 2001 To: Jerry Williams, Williams Brothers Construction, LLC Fr: R. Dale Beland AIA, AICP Re: Baxter Meadows: Review Comments Phase I PUD Concept Plan and Major Subdivision Pre-application Cc: Andy Epple AICP, Director;Department of Planning & Community Development Phill Forbes, P.E.; Morrison& Maierle The following comments have been received from DRC members as noted: Neil Poulsen,Building Official: 1. A detailed site grading plan is to be prepared as part of the final site plan process. 2. A complete soils analysis and foundation installation recommendations created by a Montana registered engineer for each phase of construction will be required when initial building plans are submitted for that phase. 3. Building foundation elevations are to be staked and certified by a Montana registered engineer prior to foundation wall inspections unless the adjacent street curb is installed and initial site grading is completed. 4. Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued on buildings and structure until written approval has been received from the Planning, Engineering and Water/Sewer Departments. Mike Certalic, Water/Sewer Superintendent: 1. Phasing of this development shall include fiill time vehicle access to all water and sewer infrastructure for maintenance. 2. All water mains exceeding 500' shall be looped. 3. Termination of water mains for each phase shall not include a value as shown in the concept plan. Extensions of these mains shall begin with a valve. 4. Symbols for fire hydrants, water valves, water mains, etc. shall be consistent with City of Bozeman Modifications to the Montana Public Works Standards. The Concept Plan does not identify accordingly. 1 • r J 5. The Sanitary Sewer Concept Plan does not clearly identify lift stations and/or force mains. The legend does not label these correctly. 6. The City of Bozeman recognizes the need for and will maintain a centralized sanitary sewer lift station that is in accord with an expanded wastewater facilities plan which includes this development. However, the City will not sustain costs of maintaining satellite lift stations to enable development if sites that cannot be served by a gravity sanitary sewer collection system. Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service: 1. Per the terms of the annexation, the developer was advised that the first phase of this development will rely heavily of the North 19`h Avenue/Baxter Lane intersection. Prior to final plat approval for Phase I, the developer shall provide the city with a payback of$ 42,500 (to be confirmed) for a share of the costs of the recently constructed signal. 2. Based on the outcome of a traffic analysis, improvements to Baxter Lane may be required. 3. The Annexation Agreement must be approved by the Commission prior to plan and spec approval. 4. If improvements are going to occur on County roads (Davis and Baxter), the plans and specs must also be approved by the County Road Superintendent. 5. Water rights or cash-in-lieu thereof must be paid prior to final plat approval of Phase I. 6. Will amendments to the water/wastewater facility plans be needed for Phase I? If so,they should be required to be submitted with the preliminary plat application. 7. The terms of the annexation require the developer to dedicate or offer to sell to the City, at pre-development value, 10 to 15 acres for use of a public service complex or public service/fire station complex. Neither the concept plan or pre-app plat show such an item. 8. The submittal indicates a sewage lift station is required for phase I development. Thus, we need to determine if a special maintenance district is needed to cover the expense of the operations and maintenance of the facility. If required, the district must be formed prior to final plat approval. 2 6 9. An 80-foot r/w is proposed for Ferguson. The recently adopted 2001 Transportation Plan requires 90-feet r/w for collectors. I believe the Commission supported the acquisition of the required r/w, even if the street standards were reduced. Thus, I do not support the reduction in the r/w width. Further, the standard shown does not comply with any of the recommended standards of the Plan. AS this is the first development to challenge the r/w and design recommendations of the Transportation Plan, I think we should be very careful about accepting deviations. With that said, I believe there are other designs that can be considered, as long as the standards are met for driving lane width, sidewalks, and boulevards. Again, I don't support reduction in the r/w widths. 10. Same comments regarding r/w width for residential street (58-feet), neighborhood green r/w(only 42-feet), and equestrian court (48-feet). The design standard is very similar to that recommended in the Plan. The 60-foot r/w should be obtained, and the Plan standard utilized. 11. Baxter Lane, a minor arterial- proposed design doesn't match up with any in the Plan, but does combine some features. Will bike/sidewalk be on the north or south side? I propose the north, so it's adjacent to the Phase I development. 12. A 20-foot wide alley, with garages setback only 2-feet, will make for interesting snow removal(which will be done by an owners' association, and not the city). 13. Clarify their comment "Baxter Meadows will be responsible for the construction of only the west half of Davis Road"? Need to clearly identify "west half'. 14. The location of the proposed round-about should be thoroughly discussed. Is it an effective location, or would it be better at the intersection of major streets? 15. Bike lane/pedestrian path being shared. Pros and cons. Is one of the recommended designs for collectors& arterials? 16. Preliminary plat should show a"no direct access from lots to Baxter and Davis"note. 17. The application doesn't show water and sewer services. The preliminary plat Must. They'd discussed at one time the equestrian area not being served by City services. If not, the preliminary application must fully explain what type of services will be provided. 3 The following comments were supplied by Morrison-Maierle, as consultant to the City: 'Streets: 1. The permanent dead end road does not comply with the cul-de-sac or t-turnaround requirement (16.16.010 E). 2. The north end of the one-way couplet transition to a two-way street may function better if it occurred at mid-block; alternatively, continue couplet north through more of the project. 3. Ferguson is identified as a collector and therefore the right-of-way and street section should match those specified in the Transportation Plan. The right-of- way width should be increased to 90 feet. A one-foot centerline striping area should be added and provisions for bikes should be added on both sides of the road. 4. The width of the improvements on Baxter should match the Transportation Plan Either the 2, 3 or 5 lane section should be utilized with the number of lanes being dependent on future traffic projections. If the 2-lane option is the preferable option based on traffic projections,the lane width needs to be increased to 11 feet and provisions for bikes needs to be made on both sides of the road. 5. Street sections E and F are non-standard ditch section roads. IN the past, these types of roads have been required to be privately maintained. 6. Street section G meets the local k street standard called out in the Transportation Plan wit the exception of the boulevards are each one foot narrower than specified. 7. It is noted that the alleys provide the only vehicular access to the cottage Homes. Does the City have any alley standards?Need to show that City garbage collection trucks can negotiate alley corners, or punch ends of the east-west alley through to street. 8. Street section I matches the local standard called out in the Transportation Plan with the exception that no parking is allowed on the park side of the street. 9. Street section J is a non-standard width. 10. The Davis street section shown on the pre-application plan is different that the recommended section of a 5' sidewalk, a 8.5"boulevard, a 2' curb and gutter section, 2-12' lanes, a 6"curb and a 9' center median. 4 r L 11. Does the equestrian area need a secondary access?Note that the next phase of the equestrian area will have an access to Baxter. May need temporary turn arounds at ends of Equestrian Loop Road, although not recommended at this time. 12. Who will be responsible for maintenance of the roads and alleys? 13. A modern roundabout is not a traffic-calming device, as stated in the narrative. Published literature on roundabouts indicates locations with heavy flows on the major road and low flows on the minor road are unfavorable for roundabouts. Storm Water Issues: 1. As part of the preliminary plat submittal, 100-year flood elevations should be computed for the Spring Ditch and the Baxter-Border Ditch, and the limits of flooding identified. 2. The Baxter-Border Ditch should be relocated to be outside of the Baxter Lane right-of-way. 3. All ditch easements and setbacks need to be shown on the preliminary plat. 4. The preliminary plat application needs to include a detailed grading plan. Sewer: 1. The proposed depth of the Davis Lane Interceptor is not adequate for lateral mains to be installed. 2. The sewer mains in the equestrian area should be extended to Baxter Lane in order to allow for service to be extended to the south. The sizing of the lift station and the sewer mains in the areas should take this into account. (16.14.100D) 3. How does the applicant propose to serve the Cottage Homes, Condominium . Units and the Town Homes with sewer, keeping in mind a need to access manholes with a large flusher truck? 4. Are the proposed main depths adequate to provide service to all of the units? Water: ` 1. The water line in Davis should be"12". 5 2. Water lines in the area of the equestrian lots need to.extend to the south boundary of the subdivision. 16.14.120 F Parks: 1. The pocket parks should be identified with the application. Given their size, they are most appropriately privately owned and maintained. 2. Ownership and maintenance responsibility for the Equestrian Open Space should be identified with the application. General Issues: 1. The proposed development. Especially the Cottage Homes, will require nonstandard utility easements. Due to the anticipated development schedule, the applicant should get utility company agreement on the location of all non- city utilities. 3. The zone code requires that one-way accesses be a minimum of 16 feet and two-2ay accesses be a minimum of 24 feet. Affects access to the Townhomes internal lot, etc. 4. Will there be a separate review and approval process for the multi-family and mixed-use areas/buildings? Comments received from the Design Review Board included the following: 1. Concern about perceived segregation of housing by block. Would prefer more mixing of housing types per block. 2. Need to address alley accessibility re snow removal. Reduce density to allow accommodation of storage and parking? 3. Assure affordability by means of deed restriction or other means. 4. Need streetscape variety. Include street elevations to show diversity and mix of housing types. (When draft minutes of the DRB meeting are available, they will be forwarded for your review.) Chuck Winn, Bozeman Fire Department: 1. Most, if not all, of the proposed project lies outside of our desired six(6) minute response time. Until such time as the Bozeman Fire Department is 6 .able to increase personnel and either relocate or build.another fire station to:. adequately serve this project, all inhabitable structures shall be protected by approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2. At the time Bozeman Fir Department becomes responsible for fire and life safety services, all fire hydrants required by City of Bozeman regulations, including the Uniform Fire Code, shall be installed prior to commencement of combustible construction. Should the developer wish to begin the project without annexing, he will be subject to the requirements of the local fire department in his jurisdiction. However, all conditions listed herein musts be met prior to annexation into the City of Bozeman. 3. We are willing to look at proposals for individual phases based on changing conditions. Andy Epple AICP,Director of Planning& Community Development notes that simultaneous development of project increments and appropriate infrastructure must be consistent with Ordinances# 1532 and# 1533. Those regulations have been designed to accommodate "fast-track" development such as Baxter Meadows. Baxter Meadows comments 9190 Ldoc 7 CITY OF BOZEMAN DIi �I'MENT OF PLANNING AND%�IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT rJ x Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 CO M�?� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Wendy Williams,Natural Resources Conservation Service Ann Banks, Parks &Recreation Advisory Board Sue Harkin, Parks &Recreation Advisory Board . Ron Dingman, Park Superintendent Mark.Tymrak, Director of Public Safety George Durkin, County Road Department Ralph Zimmer, Pedestrian &Public Safety Committee, TCC FROM: Carol L. Schott, Administrative Secretary RE: Baxter Baxter Meadows MaSub PUD Preliminary Plat#P-0128 and Zoning PUD reliminary Plan #Z 01204-- ') DATE: October 23, 2001 Attached you will find the preliminary plat application for the proposed Major Subdivision PUD referenced above to develop 64.66 acres into 144 mixed-use lots. The property is legally described as that part of the SW'%4 and all of the SE'/4 of Section 34, T1 S, R5E of PMM, and the NW'/4 of Section 3, T2S, R5E of PMM, Gallatin County, Montana, and is located on Graf Street. Please review the.attached information and provide comments to this office no later than j Tuesday, October 30, 2001. The proposed subdivision PUD will be discussed by the Development Review Committee on October 30th at 9:00 a.m. The proposed zoning PUD will be discussed by the Design Review.Board at 3:00 p.m. on the same day. The meetings will be held in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street.. The proposal will go before the City of Bozeman Planning Board'at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday,November 6,.2001, also in the Commission Meeting Room at City Hall, 411 East Main Street. The City Commission will make the final decision on the proposal at their 7:00 p.m. meeting on Monday,November 19, 2001. You are welcome and encouraged to attend these meetings. Please return all materials as they are needed for packets for Planning Board and City Commission. If you are unable to respond in writing by the above deadline or if you have questions or . concerns regarding the application,we ask that you contact Contract Planner Dale Beland at 582-0050 Thank you for your cooperation.. CLS/cls Attachments planning• zoning • subdivision review •.annexation • historic preservation housing'• grant administration neighborhood coordination • • . BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I FILE NO. Z-01204 SUBDIVISION P.U.D. P.U.D. PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM: APPLICATION NO. Z-01204 APPLICATION FOR A CONDITONAL USE PERMIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL/MIXED-USE P.U.D. TO SUBDIVIDE 64.66 ACRES AND CREATE 140 LOTS ON PROPERTY ZONED "RS", RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN DISTRICT, "R-3 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM-DENSITY DISTRICT, AND "BP BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT". APPLICANT: MITHUN PIER 56, 1201 ALASKAN WAY,STE. 200 SEATTLE, WA 98101 OWNER: WBC LP 4598 EAST BAXTER LANE BOZEMAN, MT 59715 DATE/TIME: BEFORE THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2001,AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: R. DALE BELAND AIA,AICP STAFF CONSULTANT TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION: The subject property is described as Phase I (64.66 acres) within Tracts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Certificate of Survey No. 2202, which is on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana;being shown as a portion of the Southwest Quarter and all of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Townshipl South, Range 5 East of P.M.M.; and the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., Gallatin County,Montana; and further described as revisions proposed by the applicant to Certificate of Survey 2202. (Please refer to the map on the following page and Exhibit "O"of the application materials). BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 1 I BAXTER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION.- PRASE 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SE 114, SW 114 OF SECTION 34, TIS RSE, P.M.,M, NE 114 OF SECTION 3, T2S RSE, P.M.,M. GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA 1/7 WT YICNAEL 0.CCKNLEE KATN R.COX 1/2 WT JDNN U.COX BARBARA N,CO TRACT A-5 COS 66.A UNPLA rtED N 1/2. Oemge E.W..U0. NW I 4, $SW1/4 Kay Weauvw um Caen , COS No.233 110 fm 2117 Kingma 0oi.y Pmm.r.Nlp LOT IA 117 rm 2776 YINOp SUB.NO.145A Rooert Oene O..h •� Sl" -r S 4 1e1 rm 532C A(r 1.322.58' 26iH Sanaaa L.L.C. I � I lee rm um Ronda 0.Aal.a1 0 I Yory K.Aalaal e ru 910-912.959 • NP K '10'a 1322.83' ferry 0.K'iYpalricl 460.298 ACRES(TOTAL) Kara S.Len, n9 fm'Co' all.]Bq p? Sa m o..N N.o...a,J"a.U.0 • `a I O7� 9 fm 3r3 16 F.253:c 1 5� O Dien.C.A Se/1 / Q a F. eoq,n 9nss9 N0T01'24^N 632.51 y4B.G2' .aiam x vtiv.a. T 17 F.?6.I I I S89'S0'54 1983.05' BAXTER LANE BAXTER LANE RuOTNE A ANO LECSA POOIE UNPUTIEO ANOERSON Brvee Eng 2026536 149-206 9e im 467. UNPLATTED Ves to run Ana.raon Yory[a111.lina Ntlaon LIf.EaW. 7.-s]. $ g 2 rm 1014 aec. UNPLArrEO (` 2 L Lim,led �1 Parin.,d6P 9.-11 151 rm 749-751 COS ND,1]02(R[u.) Owglaa Lanca Sm0 1.2 rm 69 N 2636.25 i 'o 2 SWERSON YNPLAIrta ,mart f 7.fi.6 UNPLATTED Joan Lt�ia I/2 c TR I A W01—N. a 8.11y YcDrndd Load j^E COS No.2007 1 SIP.7;al [ompany Limited p Porineranip 1/2 p 'o 132 r,a 4365 BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 2 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS'OF APPROVAL: Pursuant to Chapter 18.54-"Planned Development"- of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, the Planning staff, Development Review Committee (DRC), Design Review Board (DRB), and other applicable review agencies have reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 64.66 acre residential/mixed-use subdivision known as Baxter Meadows Phase I, to determine if the proposed planned unit development (P.U.D.)meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance,the Bozeman Area Master Plan, and the intent and purpose of the community objectives outlined in Section 18.54.020. Based on the findings outlined in this staff report, the Development Review Committee has concluded that the proposed Baxter Meadows Phase I P.U.D would meet the requirements of the Bozeman Area Master Plan, Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, and the intent and purpose of Chapter 18.54 - Planned Unit Development with the following recommended conditions listed below. The Design Review Board was unable to forward a recommendation due to a 3-3-tie vote. 1. The homeowner's association documents shall be recorded and filed at the Gallatin County Clerk&Recorder's Office with the Final Plat and prior to Final Site Plan approval for the residential/mixed-use planned unit development. 2. The landscape plan shall be prepared and certified by a landscape architect, nurseryperson, or equally certified professional, and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. 3. The developer shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City of Bozeman to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of submitting for final P.U.D. plan review and approval. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and method of security shall be made a part of said Agreement. 4. If occupancy of structures is to occur prior to the installation of all on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the schedule improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 5. Building permits may not be issued until the Final Subdivision Plat and Final Site Plan have been approved and all required infrastructure and street improvements for said residential subdivision have been installed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman;unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission under provisions of Municipal Ordinances# 1532 and# 1533 for concurrent construction. 6. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia&Associates, dated October 2001, shall be updated and made a part of the application materials submitted for approval of each and all subsequent phases of subdivision. 7. All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of-way and provisions for bicyclists, shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 3 I • in'the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update, with the exception of Latigo Avenue and Bozel Street, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. The street section for Latigo Avenue and Bozel Street(as shown on Baxter Meadows Phase I Exhibit"C", dated 11/14/01) is approved by the City Commission as a variation. 8. The applicant's proposal to allow primary vehicular lot access off alleys shall require that the City Commission grant a variation to the lot access (frontage) standards in the City Code. Snow removal responsibility in alleys used as primary vehicular access to lots shall be private. 9. The applicant's proposal to allow variations from Chapters 18.12 and 18.20 of the Municipal Code (lot area, lot width, coverage etc.) as described in Exhibit"I" shall require approval by the City Commission. 10. A Storm water Master Plan for the planned unit development for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the storm water-receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information(particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical storm water detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a storm water maintenance plan. Any storm water ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Storm water ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision(e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the Final Site Plan for each lot and/or phase. 11. The Final Site Plan shall coordinate the proposed landscaping with the proposed water and sewer utilities in a manner acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 12. The applicant is advised that the water and sewer infrastructure required for each phase of development shall be subject to further review. 13. The preliminary plan shows public sidewalks crossing onto Town Home lots. The final plan shall identify such sidewalks and show proposed easements. The final plat for each phase shall grant access easements to the public at these locations. BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 411 • • 14. The applicant shall submit seven(7) copies of the Final Site Plan and supplemental document containing the streetscape profiles, architectural design, building footprint, elevations, floor plans, and landscape features prior to Final Site Plan approval. 15. The applicant shall submit a written narrative with the Final P.U.D. Plan outlining how each of the conditions of approval has been addressed. PROPOSAL: The application for Conditional Use Permit is for a residential/mixed-use planned unit development to subdivide approximately 64.66±acres of land into one hundred forty(140) residential/mixed-use lots. Phase I of Baxter Meadows is generally located north of Baxter Lane, centered on Ferguson Road. Access to the proposed development will occur at Ferguson Road and at Gallatin Green, with emergency road access to Baxter Lane via Riata Road. The equestrian estate home neighborhood surrounds the proposed 10+-acre equestrian complex and comprises about half of the total Phase I area. To the east, a mixture of higher density residential lots is designed around a system of pocket parks,neighborhood green and the linear park. The proposed Baxter Meadows Barn/Community Center, bed/breakfast and related facilities comprise the portion south of Baxter Lane adjacent the proposed 100-acre regional park site. The proposal is made as a subdivision P.U.D. (rather than a standard subdivision) to allow for alternative street standards. Another reason is the project's overall design of the extensive network of opens space,parks and linear trail system whereby each phase is integrated into the project whole. It is described as a"neighborhood"designed in accordance with the goals and policies of the newly adopted Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. The resulting residential/mixed use subdivision of 140 lots will accommodate 156 dwelling units as follows: 30 Estate homes(single-family residential); 20 Traditional homes (single-family); 20 Village homes(single-family); 40 Cottage homes (single family); 19 Town homes ( single-family); 7 Live/work units (single-family); 20 Condominiums (units); 1 Bed and breakfast; 1 Veterinary clinic; and 1 Equestrian center. Section.18.12.030, Lot Area and Width, of the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that the lot area and width for newly created lots in the"RS" district shall be determined through the P.U.D. review procedures set forth in Chapter 18.54, Planned Unit Development, and shall be developed in compliance with the adopted Bozeman master plan. As a result, the application for preliminary subdivision plat review shall be evaluated in this staff report as a zoning P.U.D. (i.e., to determine adequate lot area and width). Please refer to Exhibit "I" following this page. BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDMSION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 5 Exhibit "I" - Variations fro><n Chapters 18a.2 & 18.20 LOT LOT LOT FRONT REAR SIDE NlA1X. PIZODucr ZONING AREA wIDTII COVL'IZAGI, FLOOR AREA YARDS YARD YARD IIEIGIIT RE9U//Z�O� 3ooa-S-0104 SV e-o' -100, 2o" 20/ S/ 32'-3S' COTTAGES R-3 2688 * 42' * 52% * 1,200 - 2,200 10' * 2' * 5' 38'-0" VILLAGES R-3 4094 * 46' * 55% * 2,000 - 2*,350 10, * 2' * 5' 38'-0" • TRADITIONAL R-3 7,425 82.5' 29% 3,000 - 3,650 14' * 5' * 5' * 3 T-O" ESTATES R-S 13,200 120' 27% 4,000 - 4,200 14' * 16' * 5' * 32'-0" ACCESSORY 5' * 5' TOWNI-fOMES 4-PLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 - 2,000 10, * 6' * 0' 38'-0" 3-PLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47'%o * 1,500 - 2,000 10' * 6' * 0' 38'-0" DUPLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 - 2,000 10' * 6' * 0' 38'-0" CONDOS R-3 33,451 190.6' 50% * 8,200 10' * 5' * 0' 38'-0" LIVE/WORK * R-3 1620 * 22' MI6% 1200-1600/250-500 6' * 5' * 0' 42'-0" BED & BREAKFAST R-3 206,696 752' 5% 5,502 20' 20' 5' 3W-0" LQUEsTIUAN CENTER R-S 435,600 1106.4 10% 45,000 35' 25' 25' 4,1'-0" CONIM. CENTER * R-3 SEE BED & BREAKFAST 3,460 20' 20' 5' 38'-0" VETERINARY R-S 3,460 200' 8% 3,460 35' 25' 25' 32'-0" * VARIES FROM CHAPTER 18 BOZEMAN ZONING JURISDICTION AND BOZEMAN AREA MASTER PLAN: As a result of recent annexation and a Master Plan Amendment, the property is designated as Urban Residential, Suburban Residential, Rural Residential and Public Open Space on the Land Use Plan Element of the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update. Approximately half of the east portion of property is within the "Sewer Service Boundary", the next portion to the west is within the"Urban Growth Boundary. Subsequent to annexation, rezoning to municipal zone districts of RS Residential Suburban District, R-3 Residential Medium-Density District, and BP Business Park District has been approved The principal permitted uses in the "RS Residential Suburban District" range from agricultural uses and one-family dwellings to day care homes and parks as permitted principal uses. Permitted conditional uses include churches, day care centers, schools, veterinary uses and other residential uses approved as part of a planned unit development (P.U.D.). The "R-3 Residential Medium-Density District"permitted uses include a range of single- family and multifamily dwellings, plus group homes. Conditional uses include bed and breakfast and similar group facilities. The `BP"zoning district includes a spectrum of administrative, office and light manufacturing uses. Any use is permitted via a planned unit development approval. Thus, the proposed residential/mixed-use P.U.D. subdivision complies with both the zoning ordinance and master plan designation, based on the allowable urban densities and by obtaining approval of a conditional use permit by the City Commission for a residential/mixed use planned unit development. STAFF FINDINGS: The Bozeman Development Review Committee (DRC), Design Review Board (DRB), and other applicable review agencies (Montana Department of Transportation, County Road & Bridge Office, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Montana Power Company, U.S. West, etc.) have reviewed the application for P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Review of Baxter Meadows Phase I Subdivision P.U.D., a 140-lot residential/mixed-use planned unit development, as well as the supplemental information provided in the application. The application was evaluated against the community objectives set forth in Section 18.54.020 and the design objectives and criteria in Section 18.54.100. A written summary- review of the comments and recommendations provided by the applicable review agencies is provided below. 18.54.020 -Intent of Planned Unit Development BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 6 I 0 With regard to-the improvement and protection of the public health, safety, and welfare, it shall be intent of the P.U:D. Chapter of the Zoning Ordinance to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: A. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the zoning iurisdiction of the city is in accord with the city's adopted master plan,its specific elements and its goals, obiectives and policies. The applicant submits that the proposed neo-traditional residential/mixed use planned unit development is specifically consistent with major goals and policies of the Bozeman Area Master Plan: "Encourage construction of a full range of housing types, sizes and costs, including manufactured and modular homes, to assure the opportunity for future residents to obtain a choice of living environment" (Residential Goal 2)". "Encourage development to occur within the Bozeman Urban Growth Area (Public Facilities Goal 3)". In addition, the application is deemed consistent with other goals and policies. B. To encourage innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for better housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the Bozeman area. The applicant has proposed a significant new planned unit development with integrated neighborhood/open space/trails design and submits that it is consistent with the important Bozeman Area Master Plan goal to: "Encourage planned unit development and cluster residential development techniques that feature a variety of housing types, designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities (Residential Goal 3)". Based on the merits of the proposal and consideration of the criteria set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Staff supports the general"neighborhood" concept of the residential/mixed use planned unit development. Based on existing land use patterns and anticipated future growth,the DRC has not identified any potential effect on adjacent land uses that could not be addressed with the recommended conditions of approval forwarded by the advisory body. The proposed residential/mixed-use development is not in proximity to any identified public lands and would therefore not affect access to public lands. There are no known health, safety hazards or other nuisances, such as unpleasant odors, unusual noises, dust or smoke, with exception of the regional risk of seismic activity. (As previously noted, the DRB was unable to forward a recommendation due to a tie vote.) BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 7 I 4 C. To-foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation.and other public facilities. This objective is intended to encourage the developer to establish a conceptual master plan of land use patterns that promotes a cohesive and logical design of land uses that will discourage the potential for conflicting land uses through maximum flexibility in the regulatory standards and innovation in the development of land, as well as the design of development projects. The applicant is requesting variations to current Bozeman street standards, which require this subdivision to also be considered a subdivision P.U.D. Specifically,the street section for Latigo Avenue and Bozel Street proposes a standard 60 ROW, with a 16 foot drive lane with seven foot parking lanes each side, plus a six inch curb, seven and one- half foot planter, five foot sidewalk with two feet back of sidewalk(per Baxter Meadows Phase I Exhibit"C"dated I1/14/01). D. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks. Through the conditions of approval outlined in the preliminary subdivision plat review of the residential/mixed-use P.U.D., the applicant will implement the construction of the streets and utilities infrastructure network and transportation system. This will ensure that the development will foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land, transportation, and other public facilities based on current engineering and infrastructure requirements. The applicant has designed this Phase I subdivision with approximately 24%reserved in public open space, which contains approximately 3.6 acres of dedicated parkland, or 6%, and 11.8 acres of equestrian neighborhood open space and trails, or 18%. The remaining areas reserved for private open space consist of the equestrian center, bed and breakfast, private streetscape, interior cul-de-sac landscape features, and private open space within the interior of private lots. The private open space totals approximately 31.1 acres or 48% of the site. The Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Review Committee has noted the significant relationship of Phase I to the proposed 100-acre regional park, located to the south of Baxter Lane. The applicant has designed the total 460-acre project to include a grade-separated trail crossing under Baxter Lane from Phase I to the proposed regional park E. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage and reduction of flood damage. The preliminary plat application notes that an assessment of USGS data and the analysis of on-site streams and ditches indicate that the Baxter Border Ditch does not drain an area of 25 square miles or more. Therefore, a floodplain analysis would not be required by Municipal Ordinance 16.20.010. However,the potential for future flooding will be assessed through review of the storm water maintenance plan for the subdivision by the BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 8 ,CityEngineer's'Office,.along with design considerations that will include methods to .mitigate any potential:impact resulting from flooding in-the area. F. To encourage yatterns,of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trio consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality. The subject property has been designed to reduce trip generation by inclusion of live/work units, and by encouraging non-vehicular circulation via the trail network. The mitigation of traffic impacts on the area's existing transportation system have been defined in the Baxter Meadows Development Traffic Impact Study(Robert Peccia& Associates, October, 2001. G. To promote the use of bicycles and walldng as effective modes of transportation. Provision of pedestrian/bike trails and bike/sidewalks are a design feature of the proposal. In addition, the applicant has proposed the use of"bulb-outs"at street intersections to calm traffic and promote pedestrian safety. H. To reduce energy consumption and demand. The above two community objectives, "F" and "G", have already discussed this issue. I. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography. No significant environmental or topographical features have been identified on said property other than the wetlands identified in the wetlands delineation study, as prepared by Wetlands West, Inc. (June 2000)which is on file in the Planning Office. The applicant has proposed enhancement and protection of all existing surface waterways and wetland areas in the total 460-acre project. J. To improve the design, quality and character of new development. As noted in this staff report,the preliminary subdivision plat application, and the D.R.B. staff report, the applicant has established design parameters for a residential/mixed use planned unit development that will control the architectural design of future dwellings in an effort to create a subdivision compatible with the "neighborhood"concept. K. To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas. The subject property has been annexed by the City of Bozeman in order to obtain municipal services and develop at urban densities. L. To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of newer, incompatible developments. BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 911 The applicant haslaken extensive efforts to develop a residential/mixed use project that achieves the"'neighborhood" center goal. In addition, architectural and site design features, in concert with the significant open space/parkland/trails system of the project will limit the potential for incompatible residential development. M. To promote loeical development patterns of residential. commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood, and the community as a whole. The proposed residential/mixed use planned unit development is designed to implement the `neighborhood" concept with integrated residential/mixed use and non-residential land uses, open space/parks/trails and a pedestrian friendly transportation system. Development of the subject property with municipal services will allow for the extension of City water and sanitary sewer facilities for connection by both existing and future development in the area. 18.54.100 -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA For any planned unit development proposal to be approved it must first be found, by the City Commission, after review/recommendation from the Design Review Board and Development Review Committee,to be in compliance with Section 18.54.100 of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance of the city. All development proposals are reviewed against the objectives and criteria designated for Group 1 -All Development. In addition, individual planned unit developments are then reviewed against the objectives and criteria established for the land use classifications of the site on which the proposal is to be located. Group 1 - All Development: The"All Development"objectives and criteria establish twenty criteria, which a P.U.D. development proposal must comply with, or be found not applicable. The Planning Staff and DRC have reviewed the application against the twenty criteria and have generally found that the application for P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Review of Baxter Meadows Phase I Subdivision P.U.D. addresses the established criteria as set forth in Section 18.54.100 with the exceptions of the requirement for lot frontage for the cottage homes adjacent to the pocket parks, and the requirement that thirty percent of the project area be open space. The applicant is requesting a variation from the vehicular lot frontage standards to accommodate the pocket park focus of the cottage homes area and allow access off the alleys. The proposed open space system is described under preceding Item"D". Group 2 - Residential: Staff review of the 13 criteria indicates that the proposal is consistent and meets the intent of this section of the P.U.D.regulations. BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 1011 Public Testimony'. As of the writing of:this staff report, the Planning Office has not-received.anypublic opposition to the proposed residential/mixed use subdivision. BASED ON PUBLIC INPUT AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DRC AND PLANNING STAFF, THE CITY COMMISSION WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RESIDENTIAL/MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON NOVEMBER 19, 2001. Report Sent To: WBC LP, 4598 East Baxter Lane, Bozeman, MT 59715 Baxter Meadows Phase I preliminary plan PUD staff report.doc BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 11 fj' kcLb-� i DESIGE REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2001 MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Vice Chairperson Jim Raznoff called the meeting to order and Secretary, Jennifer Willems, recorded the attendance. MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Jim Raznoff Dale Beland, Contracted Planner Joanne Noel Jennifer Willems, Recording Secretary Dick Pohl Bill Hanson Nichole Wills Dawn Smith VISITORS PRESENT Claudia Metzler John Myles Bill Kreager Jerry Williams Brock Williams B. "SUPER" DRB REVIEW 1. Baxter Meadows MaSUB PUD Preliminary Plat#P-0128—(Beland) 4598 Baxter Lane East �k A Major Subdivision PUD Preliminary Plat Application to develop.Phase I, 64.66 acres, into 144 lots for mixed use. 2. Baxter Meadows Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan - #Z-01204 —(Beland) 4598 Baxter Lane East �k A Conditional Use Permit Application for a Preliminary Plan Zoning P.U.D. to construct a mixed use development on 64.66 acres which is located in the Baxter Meadows Subdivision P.U.D. Mr. Dale Beland reviewed Phase I of the project, noting four issues: i���� PCB 1. Housing unit types—mixture of homes; 2. Maintenance of streets and alleys— snow removal, he explained the developer was ready to accept responsibility to clear the 20'alle}Ps; Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 1 a 3. Maintaining affordability in the�wer cost units. The applicantsAwillingness to help maintain affordabilit ith a letter of intent to the City Commission; 4. Broader description of streetscapes. Mr. Beland explained concerns of streetscapes and widthsI Ie reviewed the letter from Ralph Zimmer, C airperson e ozeman Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee. He stated he received an e-mail from the Parks and Recreation Board stating they wanted more description of the parks, etc. Mr. Beland stated Bill Kreager was concerned about the lighting and had questions on the response time for emergency help when needed. Mr. Beland stated Mr. Williams was ready to sell 5 acres of land to the City of Bozeman a' Mr. Hanson asked Mr. Beland to run thru Exhibit I for clarification for the Board. Mr. Beland did a brief overview of f hibit I. Mr. Pohl asked about the receipt of the materials submitted by the applicant. Mr. Beland explained why the materials were dispersed so inadequately. He stated the applicant had supplemented the original package to satisfy the requirements of the old code. He stated the new information had better information and details, but no significant. CA*ftrA- ' Mr. Beland explained the proposed turnabout on Baxter Lane. He stated the traffic study showed that Baxter Parkway became more important in moving the traffic impact off of Baxter Lane. He stated the applicant was proposing additional roundabouts, he pointed them out on a site plan. He stated there were five roundabouts proposed for the total project. Mr. Bill Kreager joined the DRB. He introduced the project to the DRB. He stated Baxter Meadows was not to be a box or isolated pods of development. Mr. Kreager presented a slide show and explained the layout of the project, reviewing the mixed use development. He explained the traditional neighborhood design, a senior community,jobs, hotel, street level retail, everything that makes up a neighborhood. He explained the different types of housing. Mr. Kreager stated the goals had to do with a regional park in the south portion of the 100 acre Gallatin Park. He stated there would be neighborhood parks and linear park linkages, walking and bike trails, riding trails, and an Equestrian Center. He stated an existing barn would remain as a community center. Mr. Kreager reviewed the Master Plan for Baxter Meadows. He showed a study for a parks design concept. He explained the use of the pond and fields, suggesting the different facilities would utilize the same parking, meaning more open space. Mr. Kreager stated there would be plenty of opportunities for access to the 100 acre park. He reviewed statistics regarding open space, containing active and passive parks. Design Review Board Minutes—.October 30,2001 2 Mr. Kreager reviewed the character of the neighborhood, noting that none of the homes in Phase ' I would have garages which would front the streets. Mr. Kreager stated all of the "high tech" opportunities would be a part of Baxter Meadows, noting alternative energy systems. Mr. Kreager noted there would be and urban center, dedicated as an urban village, with urban parks. He stated the first phase of the Urban Village Plan would contain seven different housing types and noted 45,000 square feet would be utilized as an equestrian center. He suggested the bed and breakfast would introduce optional accessory buildings. He reviewed the veterinary office and community center. Mr. Kreager explained the street detail of Phase I. He explained the general variety of the village units. He stated the estate homes will have different characters but would be essentially the same homes. He explained the variety of the village and cottage homes and their characters. Mr. Kreager explained the townhomes would be gathered around an interior parking court. He stated the townhomes resembled mansions and would look like one large home containing four units. He explained the stacked units or condominiums would have a ground level entrance, and the live/work units would be located closest to the heart of the community. Mr. Kreager stated height would be one of the variances requested. He stated a tower would be implemented on the live/work units. He suggested the way the units blend together will be critical, noting on the west side there are three different housing types proposed and across the green would be the townhomes, condominiums, and the live/work units. Mr. Kreager suggested the community would be integrated. Mr. Kreager showed a\quilt�layout of the whole proposed plan. He suggested as the phases continue, the homes would mix together and will not be separate. He stated the fabric will be that of mixed uses. Mr. Kreager stated that in Phase I they are linking all housing types,parks, walking areas, small parks, and the mixed uses together, such as the Equestrian Center, the Veterinarian Office, and the Live/Work units, together. Mr. Kreager stated it was his goal to address the concerns of the DRB which were brought up at the Informal Meeting. He stated there will be strong covenants implemented to manage the community. He suggested affordability comes into play with the seven different housing types, with the mention of Habitat for Humanity. He stated the streetscape variety is illustrated with the Gallatin Green. Mr. Kreager explained the streetscape according to the housing, noting concerns about traffic safety with narrower streets. He stated statistically, it is easy to expect a narrow street to slow traffic. Mr. Kreager stated slower traffic would mean fewer accidents.and the level of seriousness of the accidents. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 3 Mr. Pohl had questions concerning the cottage area. He stated the access is only.alley access. Mr. Kreager stated the project is a P.U.D. and explained.the parking situation, noting all of the streets are open for parking. He stated the applicant has fully met the Code requirements. Mr. Pohl stated the streets are currently clogged with vehicles, making snow removal impossible. He noted he had concerns with the drive isle width. Mr. Kreager stated there would be a covenant that stated vehicles must be parked in the garage. He stated they would take care of snow removal in the alleys, and suggested parking problems would only occur on certain holidays. Mr. Pohl suggested access becomes critical. He stated he had concerns with parking, and vehicular access to the cottage area of the site. He noted he also had concerns with the roundabouts not really being a calming device. Mr. Kreager stated the turnabouts are designed for a semi to make it around. He stated they are true roundabouts. Mr. Pohl asked if the goal of the applicant was to make a true neighborhood, and if so, would there be a place for a school. Mr. Williams stated depending on the regional park, they would designate an elementary school site. He stated there is definitely a plan to have an elementary school. Mr. Pohl asked what the population would be at build out. Mr. Beland stated possibly 4,000 people d (k&0 or r . Ms. Noel asked if the traffic statistics were gathered in Bozeman. Mr. Kreager stated they were national statistics. Ms. Noel stated just because a road is narrow doesn't necessarily mean slower traffic. Discussion on a Builder Case Study continued. Ms. Smith asked about on street parking, if the applicant was proposing bike lanes, and access to the homes at Ferguson Avenue and Baxter Lane. Mr. Kreager referred the Board to Exihibt C in their packet. He noted there were certain streets with designated bike lanes as a regular part of the pavement, and that the streets with the most amount of traffic would have designated bike lanes. He stated Ferguson Avenue and Baxter Lane have a 10' wide bike combo on one side. Ms. Smith stated parking is not allowed on Ferguson Avenue, noting it is a collector street and asked if parking would be allowed. Mr. Kreager stated it is currently permitted. He explained how Ferguson Avenue would be treated. He stated traffic and life safety issues are critical when developing a neighborhood. Ms. Smith stated Ferguson Avenue will be used as an alternate to 19th Avenue. Mr. Kreager stated they are treating Ferguson Avenue as an interior street. Ms. Smith stated she didn't know if treating it as an interior street was the right thing to do. Mr. Kreager stated that statistics based on traffic studies show that the actual loads on the street are not anticipated to be that heavy. He stated when traffic reaches that level, things would change. Mr. Beland explained the load may not be as great as expected. Ms. Smith stated Ferguson Avenue is already a heavily used street. Mr. Beland stated the projection for Davis Street is showing as being able to carry loads as much as 10,000 vehicles per day. She stated she disagreed and had a concern with the homes fronting Ferguson Street. Ms. Smith asked why the construction of Ferguson Avenue to Dead Mans Gulch was not being constructed during Phase I. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 4 Ms. Smith asked about Phases 1-5. She asked if the phases have.the ability to exist by themselves if there should be a stall between the development of phases. Mr. Kreager stated the City is requiring them to have the infrastructure approved first and so in that sense the phase will function well. Ms. Smith asked if the applicant was adding any enhancements to the wetlands. Mr. Kreager stated the existing rights-of-ways of the wetlands will remain exactly where they exist now. He stated enhancement areas will include a 5 acre lake. Ms. Smith asked where the applicant proposed to build elderly housing. Mr. Kreager stated it is proposed all over,but in a residential area. He suggested the cottages may appeal to the elderly and would be throughout the community. Ms. Smith asked about the landscaping.in the parks. She stated in the pocket park there is a need for very high maintenance. Mr. Kreager stated the pocket parks will be utilized as a front lawn. Ms. Smith stated the natural grass area will be a very active area for children. Mr. Kreager stated there will be natural grasses, and in those areas of the pocket parks are urban areas. Ms. Smith asked how the applicant proposes to enforce maintenance. Mr. Kreager suggested several different ways to enforce maintenance. Ms. Smith asked if there was any projected pricing for the units on the site. Ms. Claudia Metzler stated they do not have any set market prices, noting it would depend on the amenities to the home. Ms. Smith suggested the cottage and village homes are to be the most affordable. Ms. Metzler stated they will be extremely competitive to the current market. Mr. Williams stated the difficulties lay with the possibility of the expansion of Baxter Lane. He stated they could range in the$120,000.00 area. He stated some of the Equestrian Homes could be in the millions. Ms. Smith stated the cottage homes have no street access to the units in the middle, and asked if fire and medical people had concerns. Mr. Kreager explained there were no impediments in getting to the front doors of any homes. Ms. Wells asked for clarity on where the homes would be located. Mr. Kreager explained the layout of the homes. Ms. Wells asked for the speed set for Baxter Lane. Mr. Kreager stated it will be 20-25 mph with the roundabouts to slow traffic, noting Ferguson Avenue has intersections, and noted it could be a bit higher. Mr. Kreager stated statistics suggest it will be a slower road. Ms. Wells asked when the whole development would be done. Mr. Myles predicted 8-10 years, noting 2010 will be the beginning of Phase 6. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 5 Ms. Wells asked if the multiple units will have their own entries. Mr. Kreager stated they will all have private entries, but subsequent phases may have apartment complexes with shared entrances. Mr. Hanson asked if the Equestrian open space would be fenced. Mr. Kreager stated there will be pedestrian trails and fences for safety issues. Mr. Hanson asked about the more dense areas, the condos and townhomes, and asked how the parking would work and about the size of the units. Mr. Kreager explained that everyone would have their own direct access with parking in their garage, behind their own garage, and on the street, suggesting there are no code issues. Mr. Hanson asked how they calculated how many cars would be on the street and if there will be assigned parking. Mr. Kreager stated it would depend on the size of the unit, noting they are anticipating every resident to have a single car garage in some cases, and some with double car garages. Mr. Kreager stated the condos have street parking on one side, the garage parking, and stack-up. He stated the live/work units have double car garages and street side parking. Mr. Hanson stated as a Board,parking is an issue. Mr. Kreager stated the Commission is very far sighted in that aspect. Mr. Raznoff stated he is curious about where we are today and where the City is in relation to other reviews and what is anticipated. Mr. Raznoff asked about fire and emergency access and if there is there access for a fire truck. Mr. Kreager stated trucks will not reach and where they can not reach they will have hydrants. Mr. Raznoff asked about the Homeowners Association and if it is the legal guide for parking issues. Mr. Kreager stated yes it would be and explained where the parking would located Mr. Beland explained the degree of the proposed variances for lot coverage I compared to the code. Comments of Staff. Mr. Pohl complimented the whole proposal. He would like to see the homes mingle more but maybe just not in Phase I. His main concern was with the access. He is concerned also about forcing people to use their garages, suggesting there will not be enough parking. He stated to make a success of the work,'live places there may be the need for more parking for possible customers. He likes the open spaces. He asked if the planting species will be reviewed and stated he would question .some of the choices. Mr. Pohl stated the alley access only in the cottage area is a concern. Ms. Noel stated her concern is primarily the segregation. She would support more mixing.. She stated there are five separate neighborhoods, and sees a higharchy in the way the homes are laid out. She felt there could be a potential problem. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 Ms. Noel stated the variances for lots are in the smaller and lower income homes and stated they are too densely packed in and need back yards. She stated assuming people do not want large yards is misguided. She state the cottage homes area, language lumping together students and senior citizens sugges igharchy. I , Conceptually she had a profound concern of the layout, even with the roads and the streets stating they create boundaries between the homes. Ms. Noel stated on Bozel Street, the neighborhood looks down alleyways and the views are to the backs of the homes and alleyways where in an estate homes they don't. She agreed there needed to be more parking and more access besides alleyway access. She stated there needed to be more of a mandate on the parking in the garage. Ms. Noel noted the access for visitors will be a problem also, so will snow removal. She stated there are safety issues. She suggested if a house catches on fire there is a risk because emergency vehicles are not able to access the homes. She stated having a common park as a front lawn will not be that well received. Ms. Noel stated she would not agree that the housing styles are varied. She stated the homes seem very close in design and suggested it could pose a problem. Her biggest issue was the segregation of the blocks. Ms. Noel stated she did not feel that the segregation issue has been addressed. She stated she sees an analogy between housing and democracy with the way,the houses are laid out. Ms. Smith stated the plan does propose a variety of living situations. She also strongly supports the regional park. She stated as far as the development itself, clustering is a good thing but.this is a bit more than clustering in some areas, suggesting there is too much density. Ms. Smith stated with the cottage homes, maybe alley access is not the right thing, they need more easy accessibility for parking and emergency. Ms. Smith suggested no homeowner would like to maintain a 10 foot sidewalk. Mr. Kreager stated there is a boulevard area from 71/2 to 10 feet. Ms. Smith stated she is concerned about the feeling of segregation. She suggested it is one use to a whole block, and suggested mixing other homes with the cottage homes. She is concerned about the maintenance of the parks, suggesting a Homeowners Association may fail. She stated the different homes seemed similar especially in the cottage homes. She suggested more variation. Ms. Wells commended the presentation. She liked the idea of adding the roundabouts, and noted the development as a whole with the units and parks is nice. She commended the thought that went into the development. Ms. Wells stated there could be more integration with the parks. She had problems with the alley accesses and the parking situation. She stated the bike lanes on the sidewalks may not be a good idea. Ms. Wells stated she had a problem with the location of the elderly complex designated elderly people. She would like to see them more integrated. She stated the alleyways in Bozeman work well when there is an alleyway and a street. She suggested snow removal on a 10' sidewalk would be difficult to enforce. She suggested considering the sidewalk snow removal and lawn care be done by the developer. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 7 4 � J • Ms. Wills stated she had a problem with the variances and the setbacks noting they are extreme. Mr. Kreager stated all of the properties have large sideyards. He suggested the homes all have traditional back yards. Mr. Hanson stated he ro'ec is Hard��tget the deeper feeling of. He statedd�o issues as they know them. He suggested Bozeman has never seen a development of this type,-stiar*:„a it is new ground. Mr. Han5de stated he tried to get a texture for what will be when the project is built out. He c ente design and suggested the complex will have a wonderful.living environment. He stated in the previous review he commented on the intermingling of housing types. He suggested m a perception standpoint he has gotten over the aspect of comparing homes to income. He stated the project would be a completely different living experience. Mr. Hanson asked, do we push the buildings to the street or should the open space be shared?He sugge=Q= f is the downsizing of the lots to make these types of homes more sellable. the board;do we support or not support the variances for the setbacks? Mr. Hanson stated he would support the variances and the project. He suggested the elements of the complex work well together. He stated emergency access needs some discussion. He stated if the water lines are laid out correctly,hydrants will be satisfactory. Mr. Hanson stated the benefit is the additional fabric of the live/work areas, the equestrian center, and the.park. He suggested the vocabulary and the fabric will hold together. He suggested it is hard to make decisions on such a large project. Mr. Hanson stated he is very supportive of the project and the issue is that setback code was not designed for a development of this type. Mr. Raznoff stated he concurred with Mr. Hanson. He noted the denser housing pattern in the cottage homes area reminds him of how parking was handled, suggesting people just can't park in front of their homes. He had concerns with the type of parking patterns which are unenforceable. He suggested homeowners will adapt. Mr. Raznoff stated this could be an example of where the 2020 vision statement is pointing to. He would support the variances asked for, for the proposal. He stated in the yard areas, there needed to be areas for barbequing and clothes liens, etc. He suggested the tradeoff for smaller yards for open space he would support. Mr. Raznoff stated a concern is that there is one Homeowners Association per phase, or per block. He stated he is concerned about how the Homeowners Associations will be formed. He is looking forward to supporting the project. Discussion: Ms. Smith asked if the Board was voting to approve the entire P.U.D. Mr. Beland stated it is just for Phase I, and suggested considering implementing conditions. He reviewed comments and concerns of the DRC. Mr. Raznoff suggested looking at lot lines of the dense areas and explained the outdoor living space. Mr. Williams explained the use easement. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 8 MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Mr. Raznoff seconded, to approve Phase I of Baxter Meadows with the variances as identified in Exhibit I. Discussion: Mr. Pohl stated his concerns with the rear lot setback, suggesting the turning radius is not adequate. Mr. Hanson explained the functionality of the width of the setback. Ms. Noel stated that Mr. Hanson was assuming the space would always be empty between the alley and the garage. Mr. Pohl suggested there needed to be more width of the setback. Ms. Smith suggested the variances requested were extreme and stated she would feel comfortable making slight variances. Mr. Hanson suggested the Zoning Code did not have a development like this in mind when it was adopted. Discussion on the affordability of this type of housing continued. Mr. Williams suggested he was trying to accommodate the request for affordable housing. MOTION: Mr. Pohl moved to amend the motion, Ms. Noel seconded the amendment, to require a rear yard setback of 5 feet, for the cottage style housing only. Discussion: Mr. Pohl suggested to accomplish the 5' setback, the applicant could reduce a couple of lots and encroach onto some of the green space. The amendment to the motion carried 5-1 with Mr. Hanson in opposition. The vote on the original motion with the amendment resulted in a 3-3 vote, with Mr. Hanson, Mr. Pohl, and Mr. Raznoff in favor and Ms. Noel, Ms. `'yells, and Ms. Smith in opposition. The Board agreed to forward no recommendation to the City Commission due to a tie vote. MOTION: Mr. Hanson moved, Ms. Noel seconded, to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Design Review Board Minutes—October 30,2001 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2001 MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Chairperson Dave Skelton called the meeting to order and the secretary recorded the attendance. MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Calvin Doerksen Andrew Epple, Director of Planning and Community Development Craig Brawner Dale Beland, Contracted Planner Roger Sicz James Nickelson, Contracted Engineer James Goehrung Greg Megaard, Assistant Director of Public Safety Mike Certalic Dave Skelton Chuck Winn Bob Murray VISITORS PRESENT Claudia Metzler John Myles Bill Kreager Jerry Williams Brock Williams B. "SUPER" DRC REVIEW 1. Baxter Meadows MaSUB PUD Preliminary Plat#P-0128—(Beland) 4598 Baxter Lane East �k A Major Subdivision PUD Preliminary Plat Application to develop Phase I, 64.66 acres, into 144 lots for mixed use. 2. Baxter Meadows Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan - #Z-01204 —(Beland) 4598 Baxter Lane East �k A Conditional Use Permit Application for a Preliminary Plan Zoning P.U.D. to construct a mixed use development on 64.66 acres which is located in the Baxter Meadows Subdivision P.U.D. Planner Dave Skelton introduced the project. Mr. Dale Beland thanked staff for their superior efforts with the project. He did a brief overview of the project and reviewed City policy. He noted due to time availability, review of the documents had been limited. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 .1 Mr. Beland asked the DRC for specific attention to the improvements of arterial streets. He stated there would be a more complete utility plan available. Mr. Beland reviewed the variances requested, as reflected in the revised information received of the applicant. He invited the applicant to give an overview of the new materials presented. Mr. Bill Kreager with Mithun,joined the DRC and expressed his appreciation for all of the work on the project. A�„w� Mr. Kreager explained the location of the project. He presented a ide show, pointing out where the City Streets were located. He reviewed the "Project Vision" and explained the mixed uses. Mr. Kreager reviewed the use of the open space, noting e i oin f the project would be the 100 acre Gallatin Park. He explained the location of the parks, park linkages, and trails and some of the proposed uses. He noted the existing barn, located south of Baxter Lane, would be preserved and used as a community center. Mr. Kreager reviewed the Master Plan for Baxter Meadows, including the wet land locations and natural waterways. He explained that the overall idea of the project was to create an urban area. Mr. Kreager reviewed the character of the streets and stated parking, generally would be located in the rear. He explained ideas of traffic calming and the typical neighborhood commercial intersection. Mr. Kreager stated the architecture will have a variety of styles. He explained that the technology of Baxter Meadows was "high tech". Mr. Kreager explained Phase I and the break down of homes, parks, and higher density areas. He.stated there will be seven different housing types. He noted Phase I would be the core of the new neighborhood. He stated the main focus of the neighborhood would be to slow traffic for safety issues. Mr. Kreager stated the largest building would be located on a full acre and would be an Equestrian Center. He noted there will be a veterinary office, community center, and bed and breakfast also. Mr. Kreager reviewed the street detail in Phase I. He stated the general character and mood was in the idea of having front porches and trees. He noted the estate homes would be the largest homes in Phase I, noting the backyards will all look out into.open space. He stated in the proposal for Phase I, there will be 20 traditional homes, 20 village homes, 40 cottage homes, 19 townhomes, 20 stacked flats, and 7 live/work townhome units. Mr. Kreager showed ideas of different housing sizes and types near the Gallatin Green. He stated the intermixing will continue in future phases. Mr. Doug Widmeyer gave an overview of the traffic study. He reviewed the traffic analysis trating on page 10. He noted Phase I would be relatively small, generating approximately :1,0060vpelcles per day, and Phase II would generate approximately 7,600 vehicles per day. ment Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 2 Mr. Widmeyer stated Baxter Lane would be the prominent access and egress route. He stated that by adding another 7,500 vehicles per day on Baxter Lane, the street would still be operable, suggesting Baxter Lne would function adequately. Mr. Widmeyer stated Phase III construction would begin sometime in 2005 and would be a pretty aggressive phase, generating approximately 12,000 vehicles per day. He stated he spoke with Planner Chris Saunders and noted that Oak Street would be pushed most of the way towards Davis Street, towards Harve/Cree . He stated in order to progress into Phase III, Davis Street from Baxter Lane, down to O , would have to be paved to complete the connection. He stated when Phase III is devhere would be a need for another primary connection. Mr. Widmeyer stated Oak Stree , is a more functional east-west connection. He stated to draw traffic south to Oak Street, to save Baxter Lane from the heavy traffic, they created Baxter Parkway with a limited number of street connections. He noted Baxter Parkway would have one or two accesses to the park, suggesting the corridor would draw the traffic to Davis Street. He stated Davis and Oak Streets must connect with the development of Phase III. Mr. Widmeyer suggested phas(�N,V, and'VI, would generate a total of approximately 23,000 vehicles per day between Baxter Lane and Oak Street. He reviewed an overview picture of how the traffic would flow, noting the majority would go onto Baxter Lane and Oak Street. Planning Director Andrew Epple asked about the 20%build out. Mr. Widmeyer explained the 20%would be at full build out, and 10%would be during the first couple of phases. Mr. Widmeyer stated they will not allow direct access out onto the streets anVave modern roundabouts. He explained there would be a need for a traffic control light later in Phase V at Baxter Lane and Davis Street, and Baxter Lane and Oak Street. He stated the modern roundabout proposed in Baxter Meadows would be some of the first in Montana. He stated roundabouts are safe and more affective than conventional intersections. Mr. Widmeyer suggested roundabouts would function better at both ends of the parkway. He suggested in the big picture, traffic calming in the original design was needed, suggesting roundabouts would calm traffic. He explained how the roundabouts and the conventional intersections would work with each other. Mr. Brawner asked if there was minimal spacing for the roundabouts. Mr. Widmeyer explained that in some areas they are located right next to each other. He stated the roundabouts would move traffic better than signalized intersections and four way stops. He recommended having a circle of 110', large enough to accommodate semi-trailers, charter buses, and fire equipment vehicles. Mr. Widmeyer stated the total circle would be 142' of right-of-way. He explained traffic amenities. Mr. Widmeyer stated the volume on Baxter Lane would be approximately 10,000 vehicles per day and Oak Street would be approximately 13,000 vehicles per day. He stated the developers proposed traffic calming within the neighborhood street network. He stated the intersections would be controlled with stop signs. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 3 Mr. Widmeyer suggested th licant be responsible for widening Baxter Lane, not necessarily to three lanes, but with ne proved two lanes. He suggested this would h ve be tended to during the entire building of the phases. Mr. Epple stated the pavement width is as low as 21', suggesting there would be concerns. Mr. Widmeyer stated enlarging the section early on would be a good idea. Mr. Sicz asked about considerations for winter maintenance on Baxter Lane in the roundabouts. Mr. Widmeyer stated in other states, snow is pushed to the outside and roads are then sanded. He stated he did not believe that there would be a problem. Mr. Brawner asked about the territory around Baxter Lane. Mr. Widmeyer stated there are two and three lane roundabouts and he would only recommend single lane roundabouts right now for the Bozeman area. He would envision Baxter Lane staying as a two lane street and handling traffic with the roundabouts. He suggested using Oak Street as the Main Street for traffic. 1 W Mr. Widmeyer statedABozeman people do not want to see five lane highways or streets. He suggested Oak Street will be the larger street in Bozeman. Mr. Brawner asked if the 142' of right-of-way would balance the demand for the future. Mr. Widmeyer stated there needed to be enough right-of-way to handle a two lane roundabout. He stated if the roundabout was not liked, it could always be reverted to the conventional intersections. He stated the main idea would be to develop Oak Street as the main arterial. Mr. Epple asked about the dimensions of the roundabouts. Mr. Widmeyer stated that the inscribed circle would be 110', a concrete apron. He stated the roundabout would be wide enough for two cars but not two trucks. He does not envision two lane roundabouts. Mr. Widmeyer stated the roundabouts could handle approximately 18,000 vehicles per day. Mr. Widmeyer stated that Davis and Oak Streets would have to be developed before Phase III began, all street cross sections be implemented, and bike facilities provided. He stated FHWA design standards must be met on the roundabouts. He noted in order to guarantee the deflection of traffic down to Baxter Lane, there needed not to be direct driveway access, and limited intersections. He noted restrictions on Davis Street, with on street parking but limited drive way access and intersections. Mr. Widmeyer stated that when the development happens, Deadmans Gulch, right-of-way, would need to be built up to a two lane facility, with a three lane into the development for the left turns. He stated there would need to be a buy off on the one side of Davis Street with the landowners for the right of way. Mr. Widmeyer stated there is a pedestrian underpass planned for Baxter Lane by the linear park and the major pedestrian bike flow would go underneath the street, by the stream. He stated the roundabouts would include amenities for pedestrians and bike traffic. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 4 Mr. Widmeyer reviewed table 9 on page 20 in the traffic study. He noted that Oak Street would handle 43% of the traffic onto and out of the development. He stated 35%would be at 19th Avenue and Durston Road. He reviewed the statistics of traffic generation and the off site impacts. Mr. Widmeyer suggested there would be problems at these intersections anyway. He stated the applicant did have obligations to some of the intersections as the phases develop. Mr: Brawner asked for ideas in maintaining traffic speed along Baxter.Parkway. Mr. Widmeyer stated there would be curves and smaller drive lanes, and suggested the design of the road would help control the speed of traffic. Mr. Beland reviewed g received from Ralph Zimmer, Chair of the Bozeman Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee. ,L,40 Mr. Beland reviewed,addition4kfor�axteradows. He pointed out physical changes on the plan. Mr. Gary Swanson summarized the water system connections into Baxter Meadows. He noted that the Oak Street connection would serve the subdivision best, also a connection at Deadmans Gulch. He stated hydrants would spray 1500 gallons of water per minute or more, noting 1500 gallons per minute meet the requirements as long as there are sprinkling facilities. Mr. Swanson stated the only variance mentioned is about valves ending up in curbs. He stated, at build out, there will be 1 million gallons per day, and 2.6 million gallons on a peak day utilized. Mr. Swanson stated there is an analysis on the waste system. He noted there are four north/south lines which will collect the bulk of the sewage, filling 50% of the capacity for Baxter Meadows. He stated the sewage lines will be able to handle future development, and explained the connection to the city. He stated there will be the need for a lift station because of the general slope of the land. Mr. Swanson stated the lines will be designed according to DEQ standards, and noted the backup emergency power system operated off of propane. He stated the bulk of the lines will be 8-inches, and noted the storm water for Phase I will be a small retention basin to include another off of the east, draining to the Baxter ditch. Mr. Swanson would envision detention basins throughout the development designed to fit into the landscaping provisions for future development. He stated they will connect at Oak Street for a better flow, noting eventually they would connect with Baxter Lane. Mr. Beland asked if the Board would be able to make comments so that he could write up a staff report to take to Planning Board. Mr. Epple stated the Planning Board President has agreed to arrange a special meeting. Mr. James Nickelson stated he had not had a chance to review the information thoroughly. He suggested another meeting next week. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 5 0'r (-o Mr. Beland revi ed commen4f the Parks and Advisory Board. He stated the Board ould like more activ op in Phase I. He stated the regional park is no accessible from Phase I. Mr. Beland stated more analysis needed to be done in reference to park land in Phase I. Mr. �Y Be a)vi1� un u st rl Mr- ai lJ1 uClu JlJ v�.�CLl li Mr. Goehrung stated he had not seen calculations and was unsure where things stood right now. He had concerns about the parkway, suggesting parking would be handled in the park itself, suggesting he was uncomfortable with that. Mr. Kreager explained the internal parking and the intersections in the park. Mr. Skelton asked what would happen with the park plan. Mr. Beland stated the ownership and maintenance would fall on the Homeowners Association after there were enough residents to handle it. Mr. Myles stated the intention was to follow the ordinances and requirements, and noted they would work out the details needed for a final plat before they obtain a building permit. Mr. Brawner was concerned about the illegal occupancy of a building before the infrastructure was in place, and asked if there was some sort of check and balance system which could be used. He stated the property could not be legally transferable until there is an assurance. Mr. Doerksen stated before anyone could have occupancy, the departments needed to have approval. Mr. Brawner continued discussion on occupancy. Mr. Doerksen explained that there could be on site electrical, but not permanent power. Mr. Williams stated they need to be able to transfer title to the occupants for there end of the financial agreements. Mr. Epple explained the pressures of occupancy. Mr. Williams stated the rules will be in place and asked how to enforce them, suggesting they could help in that process. Mr. Brawner stated there are many rules in the ordinances, but in many cases the enforcement becomes difficult. He explained that simultaneous construction would be cause for the continuous policing of the project. He would like to see something that the city does not actively pursue, something that gives the City more control. Planner Skelton stated there needed to be a schedule of what is going to happen, a protective covenant to outline what will happen and be certifiable by the City of Bozeman. Mr. Murray asked about the fire protection during construction. Mr. Williams stated they would be willing to do anything within reason for fire protection. Mr. Brawner stated concerns about the site during construction. Mr. Williams stated they have the equipment to maintain cleanup. He stated they are capable of mud cleanup, and stated that Phase I is a small part of the overall project and suggested the"Fast Track"process is about how they perform on the first phase. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 6 He suggested he does not have all of the answers but they will as time comes. Mr. Brawner expressed concern about accessibility. Mr. Myles stated that every foundation will not be poured, but they will follow the plan according to priority. Mr. Nickelson asked if the applicant would bring in small blocks of construction that they will work with concurrently. Mr. Myles suggested they would. Mr. Brawner asked if they could expect the infrastructure plans all at once. Mr. Williams explained that there will be 6 to 8 units that depending on the approval of the infrastructure, may be beneficial to pour some of the foundations and then go back to the infrastructure, suggesting things hinge on the approval. He stated the first focus would be on the neighborhood green and the utilities, then on the blocks of a dozen foundations. Mr. Nickelson asked what to do for fire protection. Mr. Winn asked if a specific plan would be provided. He stated the biggest issues were access and water supply. He stated the life safety risks are his major concerns with the hazards of construction and the fire load. He stated the water supply is an option, noting they are an urban Fire Department,needing a hydrant to supply water for a fire. Mr. Winn.stated if the applicant does not provide the tools needed to suppress a fire then they will have to watch it burn and if the applicant is acceptable to record something in this aspect, then he has no problem with the risk. He stated there will be limited ability for services if the proper tools are not provided,water and access. He s s e ate rary water supply for the project to help the Fire Department help the al pli t. Mr. Williams uld ra r get more information on previous ideas, but agreed. ��� mi Mr. Epple stated there would be some subsequent approval ccor 0 ssio . Mr. Nickelson asked if the Commission was approving conc ent construction. Mr. land stated the two ordinances define responsibility to concurrent co struction, but do no at how the applicant meets the threshold. He stated the ordinance u en the applicant. Mr. Epple suggested going to the Commission with the understanding that things will be non specific with the exception of fire control, etc. Mr. Brawner stated there is an indemnification issue, the property is City, right-of-way, and the City could be held liable. He wanted to have an indemnity of the advantage of non-plated property so the City does not have liabilities. Mr. Nickelson would like feedback on whether the final plan should go back to the Commission. He stated he would like to give a recommendation for the condition. Mr. Epple stated they could take it back to the Commission with a recommendation. Mr. Brawner suggested an agreement between the City and the Developer. Mr. —caefts "4d4 Mr. Nickelson stated the,Vtreet sections do not match the Transportation Plan. Mr. Williams stated the rightlof-way.*are alright, it is just some of the street widths. Mr. Nickelson would like to make an agreement on what agrees with the Transportation Plan as far as the project. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 7 Mr. Kreager suggested narrower streets means slower traffic. He stated they are very concerned about safety as far as streets are concerned. Mr. Brawner stated concerns about snow removal on narrower right-of-ways, and streets becoming privately maintained. Mr. Nickelson expressed concern with the main road in the Equestrian Park, and asked if it would be maintained by the City of Bozeman. Mr. Brawner stated the Transportation Plan calls for 11' streets and the streets on the plan are 10' in most cases. He noted the applicant's standards meet the code standards. Discussion on the street sizes continued. Planner Skelton reviewed current standards. He stated the P.U.D. needed to be made clear. Mr. Brawner noted that the cross sections, and temporary sections are not clear on the initial plan, and they will be looking for City Standards. Mr. Kreager stated they will make things clearer on the subject. Discussion on the Davis Street cross-section continued. Clarifications need to be made on bike lanes. Mr. Sicz asked about garbage collection and where the totes will be located. Mr. Kreager stated the totes will be kept in garages and rolled out on garbage day. Mr. Kreager stated the applicant will maintain the alleys. Mr. Sicz expressed concerns on the issues of getting the garbage totes to the right-of-way. Mr. Nickelson asked Mr. Sicz if the dead end on Latigo Street would be permitted. Mr. Nickelson stated there is a fire and snow removal issue for this street. Mr. Sicz stated the concern would be if an item is sticking up or out, causing problems for the snow plows. He stated maintenance persons hate cul-de-sacs. He stated there will be real problems with maintenance. Mr. Williams asked how often is the city willing to come plow streets if the applicant brings to the street to code. Mr. Williams stated the public would like to see alleys, and proposed to plow and remove the snow to designated snow storage areas. Mr. Sicz stated that he and Mrs. Arkell talked about installing street marking signs, stop signs, no parking signs, painting bike lanes, etc., and the complete installation would be up to the developer. Mr. Sicz stated studies would need to be done prior and during construction. He stated required items need to go in at the time of development. Mr. Mike Certalic stated he would get his comments to Mr.,Nickelson. Mr. Nickelson stated an issue that needed to be addressed in the townhomes areas and in the condo areas, was that the City requires maintenance to come in and service water and sewer mains. He stated he would like detail on how the access works for the townhome area. Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 8 Discussion on process of the P.U.D. continued. Planner Skelton stated if the plan changed then Mr. Epple's parameters need to be set to eliminate the review process. Mr. Nickelson stated it is important to delineate between the condo lots and the townhouse lots. Mr. Certalic stated it is imperative that the infrastructure that is put in, be used for the intended purpose. The Board concurred that the meeting of Baxter Meadows needed to be continued to November 6, 2001 meeting, so new materials could be reviewed. C. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Mr. Certalic moved, Mr. Brawner seconded to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 12:25 p.m. D. TEMPORARY[FINAL OCCUPANCY PERMITS - STATUS DISCUSSION- (Bldg. Div.) This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,please contact-ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2305(voice)or 582-2301 (TDD). Development Review Committee—Minutes—October 30,2001 9 i � • CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: BAXTER MEADOWS ITEM: APPLICATION NO. Z-01204. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE PHASE I PRELIMINARY PLAN OWNER: WBC LP 1035 CERISE ROAD BILLINGS, MT 59101 APPLICANT: MITHUN PIER 56, 1201 ALASKAN WAY, STE. 200 SEATTLE, WA 98101 DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 30,2001; 3:00 PM LOCATION: COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN, BOZEMAN,MT. REPORT BY: R. DALE BELAND AIA, AICP STAFF CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Location: The subject property is a 64.7-acre portion of a tract of land containing approximately 460 acres; located west of Davis Lane/Fowler, east of Harper Puckett Road, south of Dead Man's Gulch(future) and north of Oak Street (future). This portion is generally north of Baxter Lane, is bisected by Ferguson Road and adjoins the proposed 100-acre regional park to the south. Proposal and Background: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan of the 65-acre Phase I development of a mixed-use, neo-traditional community. The application is undergoing concurrent preliminary plat major subdivision review. The property has recently been annexed to the City of Bozeman and rezoning to a combination of "R-S Residential-Suburban District", "R-3 Residential Medium-Density District" and BP Business Park District"is in process. Surrounding zoning abutting the entire 460 acre project includes "AS Residential"to the south, north and northeast; and "R-3 Medium-Density Residential"to the southeast. BAXTER MEADOWS:PHASE I PRELIMINARY P.U.D.PLAN REVIEW:STAFF REPORT 1 The Phase I Plan describes a mix of seven residential housing types: Estate Homes, Traditional Homes, Cottage Homes, Village Homes, Live/Work, Condominiums and Townhomes. This housing mix provides a total of 156 dwelling units. Housing types and sizes are described as follows: Cottages: @ 1,200-2,200 sq. ft. Village Homes: @ 2,0010to 2,350 sq. ft. Traditional: @ 3,000- 3.650 sq. ft. Estates: @ 34,000- 4,200 sq. Ft. Townhomes: 4-plex: @ 9,000 sq. ft. 3-plex: @ 7,000 sq. ft. duplex: @ 3,600 sq. ft. Condos: @ 8,200 sq. ft. Live/work: @ 1,200-1,600/250-500 sq. ft. The estate home neighborhood surrounds the proposed 10-acre equestrian center and comprises over half of the total Phase I area. To the east, a mixture of higher density residential lots is designed around a system of pocket parks, neighborhood green and the linear park. The proposed Baxter Meadows Barn/Community Center, bedibreakfast and related facilities comprise the portion south of Baxter Lane adjacent the regional park site. Approximately half of the subject property is shown as open space. The proposed landscaping plan and details for the linear park, pocket park and street trees are shown in Exhibits L-1 through L-4. Appendices E-1 and E-2 describe the substance and format of the Design Guidelines that are proposed for subsequent phases of the project (Phases 2-5). Exhibit P "Temporary Facilities Plan"describes proposed locations of signage. The applicant submits that proposed deviations and/or variances from the physical design standards of Chapter 18.12 and 18.20 of the Bozeman Code are detailed in Exhibit "I" which is included in this report. This project is being reviewed under the "fast track process". Accordingly, the concept plan and pre-application subdivision plat were reviewed at a greater level of detail than usual. The current Phase I PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary plat require more amplification of details than included in this submittal. The applicant is prepared to present this additional information and respond to questions. The intent of the planned unit development concept is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and welfare, it shall be the intent of this title to promote the city's pursuit of community objectives as outlined in Section 18.54.020 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. BAXTER MEADOWS:PHASE I PRELIMINARY P.U.D.PLAN REVIEW:STAFF REPORT 2 Exhibit "I" - Variances from Chapter 18.12 & 18.20 LOT LOT LOT FRONT REAR SIDE MAX. t'RODUCT ZONING AREA WIDTH COVERAGE FLOOR AREA YARDS YARD YARD HEIGHT COTTAGES R-3 2688 * 42' * 52% * 1,200 - 2,200 10' * 2' * 5' 38'-0" VILLAGES R-3 4094 * 46' * 55`Yu * 2,000 - 2,350 10' * 2' * 5' 38'-0" TRADITIONAL R-3 7,425 82.5' 29% 3,000 - 3,650 16' * 5' * 20' * 38'-0" ESTATES R-S 13,200 120' 27% 4,000 - 4,200 20' * 16' * 5' * 32'-0" TOWNI-IOMES 4-11LEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 - 2,000 10, * 6' * 0' 3814" 3-PLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 - 2,000 10' * 6' * 0' 38'-0" DUPLEA R-3 2400 * 18' 47'Yo * 1,500 - 2,000 10' * 6' * 0' 38'-0" CONDOS R-3 33,451 190.6' 50% * 8,200 10' * 5' * 0' 38'-0" LIVEYWORK * R-3 1620 * 22' 46'Y 1200-1600i 250-500 10, * 5' * 0' 42'-0" * BED & BREAKFAST R-3 206,696 752' 5'Y� 5,502 20' 20' S' 38'-0" EQUESTRIAN CENTER R-S 435,600 1106.4 10'Yo 45,000 35' 25' 25' 44'-0" * COMM. CENT-R * R-3 SEE BED �� BREAKFAST 3,460 20' 20' S' 38'-0" VETERINARY R-S 3,460 200' 8'Yo 3,460 35' 1 25' 25' 32'-0" • * VARIES FROM CHAPTER 18 The Design Review Board is established to evaluate aesthetic considerations of larger and more complex development proposals that are likely to produce significant community impact and is empowered, per Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54 to recommend approval, conditional approval or denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City Commission for such Conditional Use Permit applications. The following list includes staff proposed conditions for approval relating to the Planned Unit Development design. Additional engineering staff conditions will be forthcoming. 1. The applicant is allowed to exceed the relevant site design standards as described and proposed in Exhibit "I"- Variances from Chapter 18.12. and 18.20. 2. The right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 3. Exterior elevation drawings of all structures shall be submitted to the Planning Office for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval. Said drawings shall indicate all rooftop and ground-mounted mechanical and utility equipment. 4. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement. 5. If the applicant intends to pursue concurrent installation of infrastructure and construction of the Phase I project, he shall submit a written proposal to describe intended compliance with Bozeman Ordinances# 1532 and 1533 for review and approval, prior to the approval of the Final Site Plan. 6. Subject to the decision to pursue concurrent development stated above, a building permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but no concrete may be poured until a building permit is obtained. 7. If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months;however, the applicant shall compete all on-site improvements within nine(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 8. A preliminary copy of the protective covenants, including but not limited to, the creation of a property owners' association documents, and maintenance, repair and assessment for the upkeep of all common areas shall be submitted to the Planning Office fifteen(15) days prior to submitting for Final P.U.D. Plan Review and Final Site Plan Review. The final document shall be filed and recorded at the clerk and recorder's office prior to Final Site Plan approval. BAXTER MEADOWS:PHASE I PRELIMINARY P.U.D.PLAN REVIEW:STAFF REPORT 3 n • L 9. The applicant shall submit detailed parking plans for review and approval as part of the Final Site Plan process. 10. The applicant shall submit the proposed landscape plan, as prepared and certified by a qualified individual as outlined in Section 18.49.040.C.3 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval. 11. The applicant shall provide adequate snow removal storage areas on the subject property or a legal document shall be executed that guarantees provision for the proper removal of accumulated snow within a 24-hour time period for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval. 12. The applicant shall prepare and submit a common signage plan for the Phase I property that complies with the Bozeman Sign Ordinance for approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. 13. Prior to obtaining Final Site Plan approval and issuance of a building permit to proceed with construction of the project,the landowner shall have filed at the county clerk and recorder's office the final subdivision plat for Phase 1. 14. Seven(7) copies of the Final Site Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director, who shall forward a copy of the approved Final Site Plan to the Building, Street/Sanitation, Water/Sewer, Engineering, and Fire Departments; and one copy shall be retained in the Planning Office file. 15. The applicant, upon submittal of the Final Site Plan for approval, shall also submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval has been met. Applicable Review Criteria: Section 18.54 Planned Unit Development: In approving a Planned Unit Development, the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outlined in Section 18.54.100 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. Planning staff has evaluated the application against the applicable Planned Unit Development review criteria and offers the following abbreviated summary review comments below: Group 1-All Development: The Planning staff has reviewed the application against the twenty (20) criteria listed on page 177-78 of the Zoning Ordinance and has generally found the application for P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Review to comply. Group 2- Residential: The Baxter Meadows project has been designed to meet the goals and objectives of the Bozeman 2020 Plan, as recently adopted. (The current zoning regulations and subdivision regulations will be revised to implement the new growth policy defined in the 2020 Plan). The neighborhood concept, including mixed-use development with integrated open space, trails and parks, has been the basic design framework for this project. Accordingly,staff finds the application complies with these criteria for P.U.D. review. BAXTER MEADOWS:PHASE I PRELIMINARY P.U.D.PLANT REVIEW:STAFF REPORT 4 • 0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:During the Concept Plan PUD review for this project, the Design Review Board discussion included the following comments: 1. Concern about perceived segregation of housing by block. Would prefer more mixing of housing types per block. 2. Need to address alley accessibility re snow removal. Reduce density to allow accommodation of storage and parking? 3. Assure affordability by means of deed restriction or other means. 4. Need streetscape variety. Include street elevations to show diversity and mix of housing types. The DRB should consider whether the preliminary plan has responded to these comments, and whether the design objectives of the Planned Unit Development have been achieved. Any concerns should be addressed prior to subsequent City Commission consideration. The recommendations of the Design Review Board and the Development Review Committee will be forwarded to the City Commission for consideration and action at a public hearing currently scheduled for Monday, November 19, 2001, at 7:00 PM. Attachments: Applicant's submittal Cc: WBC LP, 1035 Cerise Road, Billings, MT 59101 WBC LP, P.O. Box 11060, Bozeman, MT 59719 Mithun- Blair Stone,Project Manager; Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Ste.200, Seattle, WA 98101 Phill Forbes, Morrison&Maierle, P.O. Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 59771 Baxter Meadows Phase I preliminary plan review staff report.doc BAXTER MEADOWS:PHASE I PRELIMINARY P.U.D.PLAN REVIEW:STAFF REPORT 5 Carol Schott To: Chuck Winn; Craig Brawner; Dave Skelton; Debbie Arkell; Greg Megaard; James Goehrung; Roger Sicz; Bob Murray; Neil Poulsen; Mike Certalic; rdaleb@yahoo.com Cc: Andy Epple; Becky Adamson; Clark Johnson; Jennifer Willems; Tim Cooper; Clark Johnson Subject: Baxter Meadows Super DRC meeting A"Super DRC" meeting has been scheduled for October 30, 2001, from 9:00-12:00 in the City Commission meeting room. The purpose of this meeting will be to consider the preliminary PUD plat and preliminary PUD plan applications submitted by Williams Brothers Construction for their Baxter Meadows project. Due to the extensive amount of review that this project has already been subject to, and because they are utilizing the'last-track" review process, this will be the only scheduled DRC meeting. Please mark your calendars. If you are unable to attend, plan on sending someone in your place. If you have any questions, please contact Andy Epple at your earliest convenience. A packet of material will be distributed to you approximately one week in advance. 1 4 t City of Bozeman Receipt Bozeman, Montana l� , 20 4 Received of a the sum of t' Dollars for By. `�t y �'� 0., �, ��U�.:ei�Z rsh.YJ V, f � 1 ,�i. .i�.A f• ,'I .,` _ ° `: .... .. _ _ - - }J i k I I J R a CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P. O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360, FAX (406) 582-2363 F4ECEIVED pY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION O C T 2 9 2001 FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN P.U.D. CITY FLU1'\w41NG ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This review will also include a review for Certificate of Appropriateness, if applicable. Deviations and/ --or variances will be processed concurrently. Additional submittal materials apply. j [� - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— t�l 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: WBC, LP 4598 East Baxter Lane P.O.Box 11060 Bozeman, MT 59719 Phone: 406-585-1209 2. Name and mailing address of applicant Mithun Blair Stone, Proiect Manager Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Ste. 200 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-623-3344 3. Name and mailing address of representative John Myles 4598 East Baxter Lane P.O. Box 11060 Bozeman, MT 59719 Phone: 406-582-7523 4. Name and mailing address of Engineer/Architect/Planner Mithun Architects and Planners Blair Stone,Architect,Proiect Manager Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Ste. 200 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-623-3344 Robert Peccia & Associates Engineers, P.O. Box 5653, 825 Custer Avenue Helena, Montana 59604 Phone: 406-447-5000 PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 1 • 0 5. Name of project/development: Baxter Meadows 6. Address of proposed development: 4598 Baxter Lane East—Pending annexation Bozeman, Montana 59718 7. Legal description: Tract 1, Tract 2, Tract 3, and Tract 4, Certificate of Survey No. 2202, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, and being that part of the Southwest Ouarter and all of the Southeast Ouarter of Section 34, Township 1 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., and the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. Gallatin County, Montana, all described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Section 3; thence southerly 181' 33' 57", assumed azimuth from north, 2660.08 feet along the east line of the Northeast Ouarter of said Section 3; thence westerly 270" 07' 11" azimuth 2636.21 feet along the south line of said Northeast Ouarter; thence northerly 001' 12' 19" azimuth 2640.28 feet along the west line of said Northeast Ouarter; thence westerly 269° 51' 01" azimuth 1983.12 feet along the south line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 34; thence northerly 353' 01' 04" azimuth 249.09 feet; thence westerly'269° 45' 45" azimuth 632.56 feet; thence northerly 000' 24' 41" azimuth 1750.20 feet along the west line of the Southwest Quarter; of said Section 34; thence easterly 089' 52' 17" azimuth 1322.67 feet along the south line of Certificate of Survey No. 233; thence northerly 000' 22' 38" azimuth 665.37 feet along the east line of said Certificate of Survey No. 233; thence easterly 089' 53' 19" azimuth 3971.29 feet along the north line of the Southwest Quarter and the north line of the Southeast Ouarter of said Section 34; thence southerly 180' 15' 01" azimuth 2651.80 feet along the east line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 34, to the point of beginning. Area = 20,050,540 square feet,460.2971 acres or 1,862,756.1 square meters. Subiect to existing easements. 8. Current Zoning AS—Agriculture Suburban District, Note: Pending City Zoning Area: 460 acres 9. Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary): Baxter Meadows is a 460-acre mixed-use development, located in Bozeman, Montana, northwest of downtown on Baxter Lane between Davis Road to the east and Harper PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 2 Puckett Road to the west, Oak Street to the south and Deadmans Gulch to the north. Baxter Meadows will be a mixed-use neo-traditional community, a pedestrian friendly, walkable community, emphasizing pedestrian activities, a gentle human scale, and safe streets. Baxter Meadows will be a Bozeman neighborhood that preserves its natural amenities and enhance.them. It will preserve the historic barn that is located on the site. The community will be developed in 5 phases. The first phase will consist of a variety of residential uses, an equestrian center,a veterinary office,a marketing center, community center, bed & breakfast and generous parks and open space. The following is a breakdown of the different uses in Phase I. Phase I Lot Size Net Acres Number of Units Estate Homes 120' x 110' 10.83ac 32 Traditional Homes 82.5' x 90' 3.23ac 20 Village Homes 46' x 89' 2.46ac 20- Cottages 42' x 64' 3.27ac 40 Townhomes 1.45ac 19 Condominiums .81ac 20 Work/Live Townhomes .3ac 7 Equestrian Center 10ac 1 Veterinary Office lac 1 Pocket Parks/Linear Parks 4.05ac Equestrian, Open Space 11.84ac Community Center, Bed & Breakfast 5ac The "Estate Homes" will have front doors and porches, which face the street. The garages will access from the side of the home. Some of the homes will.feature a carriage unit above the garage. The homes will be clustered together and will be surrounded by fields that serve the equestrian center and preserve the natural elements of the site. The "Traditional Homes" will have front porches or stoops which will face the streets. The garages will be entered from the side of the home or from the front with the garage doors recessed from the front of the home. The "Village Homes" will have garage access from an alley. They will have front porches or stoops, which face the street. The "Cottage Homes" will have vehicular access from the alley. The front of the homes will be clustered around pocket parks or front streets. Each unit will have a front porch or stoop that will be visible from the street. The "Townhomes" will face streets and neighborhood parks. The garages will be located around an auto court to the rear and will not be visible from the street. The units will be designed to resemble one large home from the street. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 3 The"Condominiums" will have directly attached garages,located off an alley,and win have 5 units per building. They will all have a one or two car garage. Each of'the condobAdum units will have a front porch or stoop which will face the street or a green. The"Work/Live Town Homes"will have garages located off an alley. Each unfit will have a front porch located off the street and will feature a street level workspace suitable for a home-business accessed directly from the sidewalk. The Community Center will be located in the renovated historic barn. It will be used for social events and neighborhood gatherings. The architecture of the various housing types will feature traditional residential design and will reflect the architectural character of historic Bozeman neighborhoods and farmhouses. 10. Review Fee: $660.00 (Minimwn fee after refund: $400.00) This application must be accompanied by appropriate foe and twenty(20)copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements)drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8VV x 11" or larger than 24"x 36", folded in individual sets not smaller than 8W'x 11" or larger than SW' x 14" in size. Application deadlines vary. This application must be signed and dated by each applicant and property owner(if different) before the submittal will be accepted. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. 0 Date' < ate; Applicant's Signature Property Owner's Signature PUMPREL PLAN APPUCAnON AND StMMrrrAL REQ May 2001 4 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MT 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX (406) 582-2363 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant Mithun Date: Residential PUD X Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Project Baxter Meadows Commercial PUD The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items listed for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked "NO" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal, staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB) agendas, followed by a City Planning Board review. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. I. Document Requirements - YES NO N/A The following information shall be presented in an 82@ x 11" vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and will be organized in the following order: A. Application forms; X B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the PUD; WBC, LP, A Montana Limited Partnership C. Legal description of the site; X D. Adjacent property owners: (1) A copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400' of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the PUD is proposed, exclusive of public r/w; See Exhibit H, vicinity map (2) The original list shall be included in the document; Has been addressed by Dale Beland PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 5 (3) Names and addresses shall be included on plain (no return address), #10 (4-1/8" x 9-1/2"), stamped envelops; Has been addressed by Dale Beland E. A statement of planning objectives, including: (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; This application does constitute an improvement to the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan. The current and future economic outlook for Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley remains strong as many existing and potential businesses look to locate or expand their operations here. While the economic benefits are significant, the critical issue is how to facilitate this anticipated growth without compromising the values and sense of community that make Bozeman such a unique and wonderful place to both live and work. This request will facilitate development to occur around smart-growth principals that will allow a balance between quality of life issues and future phases. • Neighborhoods: Approval of this application will allow Baxter Meadows to center development around three distinct neighborhoods: The commercial/activity neighborhood (future phases), low-density residential neighborhood, and the medium to high-density neighborhood. These neighborhoods work together serving a variety of housing, service, and recreational needs facilitating the sense of community. • Transportation: Approval of this application will allow alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and transit to be developed together with the automobile rather than solely on the automobile. • Mixed-Use: Approval of this application will allow a diverse mix of activities, including shopping, living, working and recreating all within walking distance to each other. • Open Space: Approval of this application will allow significant open space, including the proposed 100-acre regional park, neighborhood parks, equestrian area, wetlands, and trails system. By focusing on proven smart-growth concepts,Baxter Meadows will provide the critical balance of growth opportunities for business while enhancing the quality of life for its residence. The benefits of this development will be felt throughout the community. (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant=s intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; The equestrian open space, neighborhood green, pocket parks and linear parks will be privately owned and maintained by WBL,LP until Homeowners Association is formed. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses; Total 12 employees for Phase I (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; Baxter Meadows has been designed as a neo-traditional community. Baxter Meadows will be a mixed-use community. The master plan was designed to promote a pedestrian friendly environment. Minimizing the impervious surface and providing narrow streets have accomplished this. This will slow down the traffic, making it safe for pedestrians. The plan also minimizes the impact of the garage by providing alleys or side entry garages or placing the garages off of courtyards. (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; This is addressed in the checklist and Drawings i (6) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated; There should be no conflicts between land uses in Phase I. The plan has been designed as one neighborhood. (7) Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g. - home/business, utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling); The plan will be in compliance to the Montana Energv Code and Building Construction. The site plan is designed to minimize impervious surfaces. Energy efficient appliances should be used. The plant material selected will be drought and fire tolerant and low water usage. Streetlights will be selected for low energy consumption. F. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the PUD, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; Utility construction will begin upon approval and completed Nov. 2002. Veterinary and Equestrian Center to begin upon approval and completed Dec. 2002. 1/3 of the housing will begin upon approval and end Dec. 2002. The remainder of the housing Oct. 2002— Dec. 2003. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 7 G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 82 @ x I I" or 1 1" x 17" size. X 2. Site Plan Requirements A. A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale not greater than 1" = 40' or less than 1" = 100'; and composed of one (1) or more sheets not lager than 24' x 36", showing the following information: X 2. Name of project/development; Baxter Meadows, Phase I 3. Location of project/development by street address; 4598 Baxter Lane East Bozeman, MT 59718 4. Location map; including area within one (1) mile of site; See Exhibit H., Vicinity Map 5. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; WBC, LP 1035 Cerise Road Billings, MT 59101 6. Name and mailing address of engineer/architect; Mithun, Architect/Planner Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way Seattle, WA 98101 Robert Peccia & Associates,Engineers P.O. Box 5653 825 Custer Avenue Helena, MT 59604 7. Date of plan preparation; October 19, 2001 G. North point indicator; X H. Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map 1. Listing of specific land uses being proposed; See Exhibit A,Phase I Site Plan 10. Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan 11. Total number, type, and density per type of dwelling units; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (Floor Area Ratio, FAR), with a breakdown by land use; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 8 Floor Area Ratio Land Use Bldg. S.F. Lot S.F. 0.10 Equestrian Center 45,000 435,600 0.08 Veterinary 3,460 43,560 0.05 Comm. Center/Bed & Breakfast 10,805 206,696 N. Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel(s) and total site, including the following: Impervious Surface Calculations Per Lot Building Type Lot Size Building Coverage % + Driveway/Walkway = Total % Estate 13,200 so ft 3,596 sq ft 27% 1,470 sg ft 38% Traditional 7,425 sq ft 2,172 sg ft 29% 1,040 sg ft 43% Village 4,094 sq ft 2,272 sg ft 55% 100 sq ft 58% Cottage 2,688 sg ft 1,415 sq ft 52% 100 sQ ft 56% Veterinary 43,560 sa ft 3,460 sci ft 8% 6,270 sa ft 22% Equestrian 435,600 sg ft 45,000 sq ft 10% -20,000 sq ft 15% Center Live/Work -1620 sq ft 746 sa ft 46% 600 sg ft 83% Condominiums 33,451 sn ft 16,760 so ft 50% 4,562 so ft 63% (Four 5-unit Buildings) Town Home -2,400 so ft 1,140 sg ft 47% 160 sq ft 54% B&B/Comm. 206,696 so ft 9,340 sg ft 5% 15,530 so ft 12% Center Total Phase One Buildings 361,994 so ft Driveways/Walkways 127,442 sg ft Roads 228,644 so ft Sidewalks 73,355 sq ft Impervious 781,303 sq ft 17.94 Acres Phase One Site Area 64.66 Acres 28% Impervious (5) Percentage and square footage of Active recreational use@ area; Active Park Open Space 1.89 Acres Passive Park Open Space 1.7 Acres Equestrian Open Space 11.81Acres Passive Open Space 30.72 Acres Total Open Space 46.72 Acres PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 9 • • 15. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest, handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking, with typical dimensions of each;. Parking Provided Product Cars per Driveway Per Unit Product units stalls Total Estate homes 3 2 5 160 Carriage unit 2 2 64 Traditional homes 3 2 5 100 Village homes 2 2 40 (1/3 of units have 2 driveway stalls) 2 6 Cottages 2 2 80 Townhomes 2 2 38 Condominiums 1 1 20 (2 HC provided per building) Live/Work .2 2 14 (5 units have 2 driveway stalls) 5 5 Bed & Breakfast 3 7 10 10 Care-taker Unit 2 2 2 Veterinary Office 8 8 Equestrian Center 10 10 (40 cars at gravel overflow parking) 40 40 Street parking 323 Total in Phase I 920 16. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; See Exhibit F, Wetlands/Existing Condition 17. Watercourses, water bodies and irrigation ditches; See Exhibit F, Wetlands/Existing Cond. 18. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; See Exhibit F, Wetlands /Existing Condition 19. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than 22@, by species; See Exhibit F, Wetlands/Existing Condition PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 10 Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan for locations PRODUCT SO FT COTTAGES 1,200 - 2,200 VILLAGES 2,000 - 2,350 TRADITIONAL 3,000 -3,650 ESTATES 4,000 -4,200 TOWNHOMES 4-PLEX 9,000 3-PLEX 7,000 DUPLEX 3,600 CONDOS 8,200 LIVE/WORK 1200-1600/250-500 BED & BREAKFAST 5,502 COMM. CENTER" 5,300 VETERINARY 3,460 EQUESTRIAN CENTER 45,000 20. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active recreational use; See Exhibit L-1, Landscape Plan 22. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks, recreational areas, school sites, and similar uses; See Exhibit A, Phase I Site Plan, Exhibit B, Master Plan, Exhibit L-1, Landscape Plan 23. Location of existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; See Exhibit L1-L3 Landscape Plan 24. Maximum building height of all structures; PRODUCT ZONING MAX. HEIGHT COTTAGES R-3 38'-0" VILLAGES R-3 38'-0" TRADITIONAL R-3 38'-0" ESTATES R-1 32'-011 TOWNHOMES 4-PLEX R-3 38'-0" 3-PLEX R-3 38'-0" DUPLEX R-3 38'-0" CONDOS R-3 38'-0" LIVE/WORK R-3 42'-0" * BED & BREAKFAST R-3 38'-0" EQUESTRIAN CENTER R-1 44'-0" * COMM. CENTER R-3 38'-0" VETERINARY R-1 32'-0" F Exceeds Chapter 18 Building Heights PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 I I 25. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial, collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the development; notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included where appropriate; See Exhibit C, Street Sections, all streets and alleys will be public 26. Existing zoning; AS, Agricultural Suburban District, Note: pending City Zoning AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls, and other landscaping; See Exhibit Ll-L3 Landscape Plan BB. Proposed signage, with locations and illustrative examples; See Exhibit Ll Landscape for location. More detailed designs will follow. CC. Adjacent site information: Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200' of the proposal, exclusive of public r/w at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (1) Land uses and location of principle structures; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (2) Densities of residential uses; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (3) Existing trees and major features. of landscape; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (4) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (5) Traffic Circulation System; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map DD. Supplemental vicinity map: Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one (1) mile showing: See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (1) Zoning districts; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (2) Location of municipal boundary lines; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (3) Traffic circulation system; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map (4) Major public facilities including schools, parks, trails, etc.; See Exhibit H, Vicinity Map PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 12 EE. Attorney's or owner's(s') certification of ownership; See Attached Certificate at end of, this Application. FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the City Planning Board and Zoning Commission certification of approval of the site plan, including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100-. N/A GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan; N/A 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements A. Architectural elevations: Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; See Exhibit G, Architectural Design B. Landscape treatment: See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape A general landscaping plan indicating: (1) Treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape (2) All existing vegetation with identification of trees by sizes of species; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape (3) Specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape (4) The scale shown on plant materials; See Exhibit Ll-L3, Landscape 3. Utility plans: The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: (1) Sanitary sewers; See Exhibit J (2) Storm sewers/grading; See Exhibit K (3) Water; See Exhibit M (4) Electric; To be provided at a later date. Currently developing this. (5) Gas; To be provided at a later date. Currently developing this. (6) Telephone lines; To be provided at a later date. Currently developing this. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 13 (7) Fire hydrants; See Exhibit M (8) Trash collection areas; Trash collection will be in cans at individual units with collection occurring in alleys or if no alleys in streets. 4. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including the proposed width, treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed; See Exhibit C, Street Sections 5. Physiographic data, including the following: (1) , A description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping; See Appendix A,Soils Report (2) A map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100' year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City; See Appendix A,Soils Report (3) A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis . of water table, fluctuations, and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping; See Appendix A, Soils Report F. Drainage plan: Preliminary drainage report and calculations and/or plan, including: See Exhibit K. Storm Sewer/Drainage Plan (1) All watercourses on the property or which are located within 200' of the.property, must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated; (2) All drainage, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc., which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated; (3) All irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown; (4) All required on-site detention areas, including notes indicating the approximate area and volume of the facility; (5) All plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for the storm drainage from the property, including the name of the drainage-way PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 14 (where appropriate), the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage-ways, etc.), and any downstream restrictions; (6) Existing and/or proposed grading plan; 7. Temporary facilities plan: A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; See Exhibit P—Temporary Facilities 8. Preliminary subdivision plat: If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City=s Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; See Exhibit D—Subdivison Plat Map I. Traffic impact analysis: At the discretion of the Public Service Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: See Appendix G—Traffic Analysis, Outline of Traffic report to follow (1) Land use and trip generation - a table of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used (daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation; (2) Traffic graphics showing: (a) AM peak hour site traffic; (b) PM peak hour site traffic; (c) AM peak hour total traffic; (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately); (3) AM and PM capacity analysis: An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial, collector-collector, and arterial-collector intersections within one (1) mile of the site or as directed by the PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 15 • Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) Trip generation - using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual; (2) Trip distribution; (3) Traffic assignment; (4) Capacity analysis; (5) Evaluation; (6) Recommended access plan, including access points, modifications and any mitigation techniques; (5) Additional Analysis Criteria: Appropriate clearance intervals shall be provided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at intersections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be 4' per second with a minimum AWALK@ time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three (3) through lanes in each direction, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential intersections with signals will be placed on 3 mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service AC@ shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service AD@ be accepted for site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall operate at Level of Service AC@; if Level of Service AE@ is the result of the study, then alternatives of providing Level of Service AD@ shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally, the design year will be approximately fifteen (15) years following construction. (6) Summary analysis explaining: (a) The proposed access points for the project, their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation; (b) Future off-site road improvements for access, which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is responsible for their completion; PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 16 (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets; (d) How traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the PUD; (e) Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the development, if used; 10. Additional studies and plans: The City Planning Board and Zoning Commission or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed PUD; particularly if the development=s compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; N/A 4. Reproducible Copy Requirements In addition to the above document, Site plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant shall submit the following for review purposes: A. One full size rolled (not folded) mylar of all plans and renderings; N/A B. One 82@ x 11" clear film reduction of all plans and renderings for reproduction and overhead projector use. N/A a` Reference to 18.54.060 A Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements@ of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance (7/02/90) Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or $4.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable industrial or commercial (includes professional business offices) floor area. Minimum fee after refund: $500.00 PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ May 2001 17 WBC,LP P. O. Box 11060 Bozeman, MT 59719 October 26, 2001 Mr.R. Dale Beland, LLC Plarming Consultant 2023 Stadium Drive,Suite 2B Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Meadows Phase I PUD Preliminary Plan Preliminary Plat Review Dear Dale: I certify that I am the owner of the subject property that is described in the attwhcd legal description. WBC,LP by JQW,Inc., general pariner_ by Gerald R.Williams, President Attachment MITHON J `-- -------- -; _i .'.�. ,. 'I Mdli�cLs,-DeslgneniPlannen -- -- --y - ------ -- - - PIer 56 trot Alaslun War '' ' ' ' / • 1 -- - --- - -1 f - ------ -- --1 r --------- --7 1 I I SoQe 200 Seattle.WAg�. �. �• T .� r - I ! i ! 2o66 2}j6yµt m I 1 I I I i i I •A2 206 623."05 �' • :I 1 \ 1 •--•• NORD CT. L _ ____ __ PREPARED FOR: Williams Brothers ConstRJctlon 1035 Cerise Road Billings,Montana 59101 PROJECT: BAXTER MEADOWS CREEK VETERINARY j \ j ESTATE' e 1 BUFFER / . LOCATION: T AC. ! _ Bozeman,Montana 1 I HOMES, CREEK ! I .y - - - -- - - i L--- - ---- - - - J' L- --- ----- --- I -- - ----- ---- - I • '/lI1'\._i'--I''�mo--_r'-`-,/�\-�-'/-�-I -- i I•1I'I I•j j,i,I I a•I 'VJ'\I i i•i,I I I I- -I IiBUFFER — - _-.-y_.IC'-\- \j•\'` I 1C•� �'-,/-/ I,u',,,, �_a_-v1\,1-.r11-I n Io-•—�--——•g 1—1--"L"_!j-C—.T_.\/-—\y'i•—.Q—•jw.--v d r t I ',\./m a:q�sn(n�•1j I �ii!rI�--•II--.6--®8�n n• ;�,,�,,,,1,1. i LI1IIIIII R—a�-�nf Ra 2+N91i-i�j ID J�n•-nww x-w—d•4adm}�l-ml?e -\-•'—-\--\,!-\-'-?I!--. ----- -Oi i -i-'--e ARI Bu1�1Ii1IIIII r Ar�A F R,i,,,,,,, I11i,I�III' iI11IIII� —� —_--_•III•---1 Ii'.iI.1 I I— I i- -I'II•II UiP iN A N- ,Ii 1II 1III'�I1II .— ---- -- - ------- --- EQUESTRIAN -_——.,\`\ •.\ \ \'\ \ \'\ .\ 10 AC. CENTER PHASE ONE BOUNDARY TADITIONAL COTTAGE HOMESHOMES LIVEMORK EQUESTRIAN LANE CONDOMINIUMS BK ESTATE HOMES r --- -- - --- -- - -- -, - Wrq mm Sr w, — 80ZELANIEET BS .�L q.F a ,wB�K. J. W OPTIONAL TOWNHOMES 7ITIALSCAR GARAGE Exhibit "A R Phase 1 BARTER LANEVAftIA Site Plan -Y_ __ _ ___ ______ _ __ __ _ ___._ ___ __ _—__ _ __ _ __ __ _ ____ ___ _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ___ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ _ACCES90NL Ip. Imed.md.'ged anpm m qp s.AwN I \HOMESV(LL E UNITSUMMARY Um wvlcL •.,L.0 yLc m 32 ESTATEHOMES-LotSize 120'x110' 1 BED&BREAKFAST at 1w ITT •AT •AOITI '.SIT dI 20 TRADITIONAL HOMES-Lot Size 82.5'x90' 1 VETERINARY OFFICE RWCOMn;wrr (82.5'x91'ON FERGUSON) i COMMUNITY CENTER ' I 'yarn air cte `•Ir IQ CEMEN eEaNNErsFAsr 01236A01 EQUESTRIAN CENTER >vacTT •uc • acL '•O •.wem ••n� .20 VILLAGE HOMES-Lot Size 46'x89' O 10/29/01 T. 40 COTTAGE HOMES-Lot Size 42'x64' sat ••Aalsa -POT ••Aa®'c wvIT iB >mxww®x�•Ins 4®Qnn�rl '•\ '\ '•\ "°""� 19 TOWNHOMES \ 20 CONDOMINIUMS -At •vaLTI _uf •vaas'd ­u., m —x•2+•O 4®Q-3-w Phase One Area: \ \ amnm 7 LIVE/WORK 64.66 Acres saI .yaws .Fit •va a'/ �•vI� ITT —xt®nv.L 6wmOI®c�+t '\N61 .vv 911 —Et*at .Ma 1I-I •rlf a ­11•1•s3 nn'In•r3 ''\' '\. SCALE: 1" = 1 (��\��10Q, • ` \. -- I I I I I I I I I I MITHUN Mdumm+Oesigne—Mannen _ I 1 r=AA1nkl.Wry I t'� I i C I 1 I I Sewk WA,6,w rAs 206 627.70o5 • EOUESTRLW LANE PREPAREO FOIL Williams Brothers / = Construction . E 18 — C 1035 Cerise Road 1 V I _ I ! I Billings,Montana 59101 'i Tim P9BAXTER MEADOWS r - LL G 1 _ LOCATI N: 1 — i B02ELSmEr i Bozeman,Montana i / ! i i ) � I I I I I I I I I _ BAITER LANE(l AftrhB .—.—.—.—.—. I I I 1 L I ❑ � I I I I ' I I 0 SCALE: 1" 100' N o aR a® • O O O'° e'4 a 9�4 � •A•° P•4�°� p p'° °•4 0 p. ° .O r' 6°�°�0° °off° oo °o��' �• �° °°�° .° I I+'�I . �rl�Jm I~,mot o°o mee P° e P° DAVIS ROAD NORTH of BAXTER v P v P INITIAL 000 rl R.O.W.) 5'•0'I T-6- IO'-0' 1 10'•0' 1 8.0 T-6 15-0`( nx-vx eR °+M MM .+cm vxrteR wme- T p• ?''1 ve I r. 1..e I e-0 II p-0 Ira 1 leabl 1�5'-O'1 T•6' u T•0' 16'•0' ! 7-0 T-6 T-0' 6- 6- 15-0'1 1 w.0 x BX R n°++oac � ..a+ •ws v r. v •s �� v S'.Q' .-Q' 1'- IQ--Q' 14'-Q• $'-Q. 2•-Q• 910[- rUxT[R 6'IA+SwO DIIM rARRIxO 6,RANieR 910e- 2'Q'r 1•Q 610e- %ANieR ORM ORM siwe 1'Q - - rm A. BAXTER LANE I10$ ft R.O.W. w•u P1AM Gl wuR J. ARABIAN COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) Minor Arterial) APPALOOSA COURT 154 rt R.O.W.I D. EQUESTRIAN LANE (60 ft R.O.W.) G. LATIGO AVENUE 6 BOZEL STREET BELGIAN COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) as 160 ft R.O.W.) CYDESDALE COURT 154 ft R.O.W.) n.„I p,e I+aI e-0 u.et.�ll x a Lal,n u_ FJORD COURT 154 ri R.O.W.) r -�@ m- *d *a -- Q ^-� •LF,BleJW DAVIS ROAD NORTH OF BAXTER INITIALS FUTURE b00 n R.o.WJ °•4 O .,w 0e �e O• OAGGe 0u.ae Exhibit 11C11 -p- 1 29.0' 1 10'•0- ¢ 10'.0• 1 0'-0• 1 10'.0' U SETBACK 2'-O' 14'-0• - T-O'SETDACK "°'°' •- w.ne. e''•® eo.c T-0' ox.e w®e' rune OMx — ".N a PLANT" S'.Z.Velwa T.O. PAveO DAVIS ROAD SOUTH OF BAXTER ". Street Sections B. FERGUSON AVENUE IDO ft R.O.W.) .x. WAGE ME— 20-0 INITIAL boo rt R.O.W.) �� E. RIATA ROAD (60 ft R.O.W) H. ALLEY (20 ft R.O.W.) OEADMANS GULTCH ROAD +� INITIAL 100 ft R.O.W.) e•4 0 °'4 0 p'a °•4 Q °O d °O.�J15. p p•^ °•q o o ° o 1166 0 v .p 6•��o °oP°56•d o 9 o a ��qo °om^ °o P .°o'e �eP°• v roreb A o 0 4 P o 0 4 012W.00 10/29/01 iom EGleex II — rcu+.cr.,.I ,..°. �.'.'so I.... rlo.eQl.v�.• Is�wllr.c ,,,.m a m.+ 11 ) ) ( ) IQ•-6• N 12'•0- 7•0- T•6 15--0.1J ! u-o 10-0 ro-o ! fi•o 10'•0• !6'•o)) DAVIS ROAD SOUTH OF BAXTER + DEADMANS GULTCH ROAD .� • S'-0- T•6' T-0' wi- 10 . r T-0' 7-6' '-0' Glee. 6' o+M PARRWO 6'RANMR sloe. 1'-0' rAls 6 nM OfM P/JL[Ixa 6 AAxRt slDe- 1-'Q• wr°.m T-0 �u� n.x n 6 r owe °u a ARcw+6•nAx e+ 1'Q' w— wKc FUTURE b00 n R O.WJ FUTURE 100 ft R.O.W.) C. EQUESTRAIN LANE (62 ft R.O.W.) F. GALLATIN GREEN I. BAXTER PARKWAY 160 ft R.O.W.) 142 ft R.O.W. EACH SIDE OF GREEN) SET NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION QQPYWQHTG2Gw YTOR N.NC Exhibit "I" - Variances from Chapter 18.12 & 18.20 LOT LOT LOT FRONT REAR SIDE MAX. PRODUCT ZONING AREA WIDTH COVERAGE FLOOR AREA YARDS YARD YARD HEIGHT COTTAGES R-3 2688 * 42' * 52% * 1,200 - 2,200 10' * 2' * 5' 38'-0" VILLAGES R-3 4094 * 46' * 55% * 2,000 - 2,350 10, * 2' * 5' 38'-0" TRADITIONAL R-3 7,425 82.5' 29% 3,000 - 3,650 14' * 5' * 5' * 38'-0" ESTATES R-S 13,200 120' 27% 4,000 - 4,200 14' * 16' * 5' * 32'-0" ACCESSORY 5' * 5' * TOWNHOMES 4-PLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 - 2,000 10' * 6' * 0' j 38'-0" 3-PLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 - 2,000 10' * 6' * 0' 38'-0" DUPLEX R-3 2400 * 18' 47% * 1,500 -2,000 10' * 6' * 0' 38'-0" CONDOS R-3 33,451" 190.6' S0% * 8,200 10' * 5' * 0' 38'-0" LIVE/WORK * R-3 1620 * 22' 46% 1200-1600/250-500 6' * 5' * 0' 42'-0" * BED & BREAKFAST R-3 206,696 752' 5% 5,502 20' 20' 5' 38'-0" EQUESTRIAN CENTER R-S 435,6001 1106.4 10% 45,000 35' 25' 25' 44'-0" * COMM. CENTER * R-3 SEE BED & BREAKFAST 3,460 20' 20' 5' 38'-0" VETERINARY R-S 3,460 200' 8% 3,460 1 35' 25' 25' 32'-0" * VARIES FROM CHAPTER 18 r - M1THUN ,- _ _ / C -- ' j BAXTER MEADOWS STREET TREES APPALOO�90 sTRFFT TREES A^d lDect:+CblBRen+Wannen _ BETULA PAPYRIFERA , PAPER BIRCH 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6'HT. Bozeman Montano Piff56 i 1 / i ' uol AlluluRWOy ! i `\ OTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 512E COMMENTS ApABIAN COURT STREET TREE$ Serale,WA 981o1 `\ , / PHELLODENDRON AMURENSE CORKTREE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6'HT. Tn m6 _ I` L / ` eTIN •R N VTR ET TREES PA io6623.70os 76 ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM J'CAL BRANCHED AT 6' HT. BELGIUM COURT STREET TRQFS ACER PLATANOIDES 'DEBORAH DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. .. ' , fOU ttRIAN LAN CTR ET TREES 158 FRAXINUS PENNSLYVANICA'PATMORE' PATMORE GREEN ASH - 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. CLYSDALF COURT ttacET TREE$ 1 \ TILIA CORDATA- U7TLELEAF LINDEN 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. PREPARED FOR: 52 GLEDRLEOI STR ET iR Brothers ISIA TRIACANTMOS '$KYUNE' SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. Williams FIORD COURT STREET TR s Constmctlon OUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6'HT. unco STREET TREES 1035 Cerise Road ' 32 ACER PLATANOIDES 'CRIMSON KING' CRIMSON KING NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. I BAXTER PARKWAY STREET TREES Billings,Montana 59101 i SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2'CAL + SINGLE STEM i FfRGUSON STREET TREES POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2'CAL + I 31 ACER PLATANOIDES'EMERALD QUEEN' NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. RHOS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 -CAL. PINUS SP. PINE 6 - 8'HT. I OR PICEA SP. I SPRUCE 6 - 8' HT. J1 ACER PLATANOIDES'DEBORAH' DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2'CAL +• BRANCHED AT 6' HT. f \ PIIOJECT: EQUESTRIAN RAXTrR LANE STREET TREES BAXTER MEADOWS OPENSPAOE SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2'CAL + SINGLE STEM LOCATION: 'ROW POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2'CAL + Bozeman,Montana --.—.—.—.—.—.__� i r. - -� PICFA SP. SPRUCE 6 - 8' HT. L- >` � PINUS SP. PINE 6 - B' HT. 1 RIATA ROAD STREET TREES 1 \ SORBUS AUCUPARW EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2'CAL + SINGLE STEM •— i POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN Y CAL + RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 -CAL. PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 - 8'HT. - PINUS SP. PINE 6 - 8' HT. I I ... tanA m. ' I I l 1 pemnrtc II 1-il _ Coco KV I I — ---•------- Juj D. E %.�/ 1)�. \�•.� ;'/ / \ LiI ._._._._._._._..�I iIi . III `! III • '�I I I "'°dam.."° • EOUESTFUAN •II,w IavP OPENS MlOW � F5. A 'tRNRf . .m .� dR I D G — ; I TLIYIIW�N Goo L16I -- --- -- .��. BK '\t } I •� I I I— ————— —�-- -- — — ——•aezELSTREs------------•-- — (7 ! LF,BS l l t I D I I / awr ua I I IS J4rTNmm. I I I I S,LF,BK,JW ! III 1 1 INITIALS /'� \\ / t Em— ,t• - J T'"''' ......1 =— --�--- - -- - - --- BAXTERLANE(Mhm AfWW — --- — Exhibit 11 11I Landscape Plan - - - -- - - ---- --'- - -- -- --'- - --'-- - -- - -'-'---- -- - -'- - - - -- - -- - - - ---- -- -- - -- - - - ---- - - - -- - - ---- ---- -- - -- -- - —' - - - 11 ------ I j 1• r 1 1 i ' , I I,I I . I I fYEII®,� • 1 II 1 I I 11 I I I I I I O I I 1b I I 01236.00 IN ) 1o/2slo1 SCALE: 1'•100'-0' Architects+Designers+Planners C/.' I � � _•_ — � � i APPALOOSA O RT c BAXTER MEADOWS STREET TREES cTR ET TREE BETULA PAPYRIFERA I PAPER BIRCH 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6- HT. i Bozeman Montana Pier56 ixoi Alaskan Way CITY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENTS ARABIAN COURT STREET TREES P Seattle W PHELLODENDRON AMl1RENSE CORKTREE 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. A331O I 44 O T. .A 4TIN GREEN STR ET TR c FAX 2o6 623.7oo5 \' I1 ! 1 i I �•� 76 ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM 3" CAL BRANCHED AT 6' HT. BELGIUM COURT STRET TREES ACER PLATANOIDES 'DEBORAH' IL DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 8' HT. EQUESTRIAN LANE STREET TREES p j 158 FRAXINUS PENNSLWANICA 'PATMORE' PATMORE GREEN ASH 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. CLYSDALF COURT STREET TREES '\ TIL1A CORDATA LITTLELEAF LINDEN 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. ! RD CT7F RFC TREEc PREPARED FOR: `•"•� '� 52 GLEDITISIA TRIACANTHOS 'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEYLOCUSi 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. Williams Brothers FJORD COURT STREET TREES Construction ` I QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2" CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. 1 LATIGO STREET TREES 1035 Cerise Road 32 ACER PLATANOIDES 'CRIMSON KING' CRIMSON KING NORWAY MAPLE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. I BAXTER PARKWAY STREET TREES Billings, Montana 5910 , SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2'CAL + SINGLE STEM 1— — — — T — - ( FERGUSON STREET TREES POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2"CAL + IV ! ' 31 ACER PLATANOIDES 'EMERALD QUEEN' NORWAY MAPLE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6' HT. RHUS TYPHINA ;STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 "CAL. OR PINUS SP. PINE 6 - 8' HT. 31 ACER PLATANOIDES 'DEBORAH' DEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE 2"CAL + BRANCHED AT 6'{ Hi. PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 - 8' HT.,.... - _ PROJECT: l 1 BARTER MEADOWS EOUEBTRUN ! flAXT R eN R TREES 1 OPEN SPACE f SORBUS AUCUPARrrWET EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2" CAL + SINGLE STEM I, LOCATION: MEADOW 1 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2" CAL + -_--.--_-_-_--•j i /,r•—•—'^`.\ PICEA SP. SPRUCE 6 - 8' HT. Bozeman, Montana 1 •1 / �.• •\ I PINUS SP. PINE 6 - 8' HT. (1� I RIATA ROAD STR Ei TREFC 1 ` \ SORBUS AUCUPARIA EUROPEAN MOUNTAIN ASH 2" CAL + SINGLE STEM POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2" CAL + RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 1 1/2 " CAL. i% \ i I Q I ' PICEA SP. SPRUCE 8 - 8' HT. PINUS SP. PINE 6 - 8' HT. i / _ PNA9EI quo OXHMMODOR!q !p neDlmro' LOCATCK I i i I i , i i l i I i i TYP _ �.. v • / I , I i • POCKET PARK 9EE E%NIBn ,� :, �•\, •\ , _ EQUESTRIAN ,� \ :..- - l , • • RF,000 EPOPEN SPADE ..: i :.•N0. EAh HExsgx OPEN SPACE -\. I I I I I 23AEE SF acmE 1. \,, • I I LINWIPARXB E%NIM• •'\ MEADOW -\ I I u••Poq DXrAa I l ! RN- :� ' , -- ' '•. '\ 1 � 1 �; / I • �- .� � uP�ex e�PAo�a I i I - I , \..\ •.1 , , 1�; _, / I \ \ YlADOW I , , •I ± 1 ._..---- ------- -------- f jr EXHIER I• �. -- —-— PARiNfRx GMRQ I .I % , •\ �, ` 4! f "IY'FOR DETAIL ! ._.._.._ _.._.._.._.._.._.._ .J•/ 1,1 I 9 4 I • • ••' • •. I PRBIK NANAODI LF,BS 4 , � ARHIXCi I - • ,--aPLn RAIL - -, I BS . , , 3[� I ! \ BS,LF,BK,JW j C. INITIALS , AEcxlXc s I - _ - . _. ._: fl-- - - _�__ � . , 0-cl. —L , s, BARTER NE(Minor Anerlel) Exhibit "L1" ._.._.._.._.:_ .._ _ _... .._.:_.._.._._.._.._::_.._.._.._........_.._................_.._.._.._.._.._ ._..............................................._.._.._.._. ._.._.._.._.._.._.._._.._.._.._.._ _._ _. _�_ _ - _ _ __ _—_ ._._ _._._._ Landscape Plan -.._.._._.._._.._.._.._._ sca • I I OPEN SPACE q ) C. � i l01236.00 ! I I EA r 10/29/01 SCALE: 1'=100'-O' SET © e 0 Q NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OCOPYRIGHTm2001 MITHUN,INC. f�. Z y,I a j` Architects+Designers+Planners �✓ I 11T Sit Alaskan Way u e zoo \•+ :( I,-% .,,,;,•�� ,� � I / L• �_ __� , /; /�- �" r - _.._.._._.._._ r -'-' - ---.- -._ ._ '�,._.�-•�.,_-•_j III .,"� Seeaattle WA g87o 2o6 623.33ggT. /Al�� �/�� rex xo66z3.7oo5 J '' • 1 ..:. � 'FJORD CT. � j .. (��_� �7�_. I ! ! I f'� -! ! ! Imo✓ _ �f�t�J t� I L.._.._�_._.._._ _ �� ,�. �l i -,, I :, �r r-? I\ I � I ! i I I I T• ,�� � � I / PREPARED FOR: _ =/.._.._. Williams Brothers i iIt /� Construction 1035 Cerise Road Billings, Montana 59101 r ���.. �. - - _ —•• ...— —!-:..-..._,.; '/ � I .. f I I i I I �' I / i / .. PROJECT: BAXTER MEADOWS , `..L_VETERINARY ! ; !\\. -• j 11AC. ! I ' i 'I BFFEEl£Rl—/= ! LOCATION:ESTAT Bozeman, Montana CREEK I J \ % H0I4�S; BUFFER � I , EQUESTRIAN CENTER--------...�,�..�•-) 10 AC. / I.. �\/_ I I r ..I... .L-�_-.�._ � _ i gEtld �a-, I I 1 I - I � I i i I F•'�, ! - �. :� . �.:.} ;'-�"."�, _-..__. ..•i ..,�k;� 1aaaaeNn ; i i i' i ! •''`r. i i i -� i - f / I i \ egwapoto=-_ Pk!ASE ONE ; �. I I i•: BOUNDARY \\\ 1 % j T13ADITIONAL COTTA6 (' `.-•.� �, 1 �; .., !i .� � ! HOM�S / i i HOMES i .• I LIV RK _ . N0. MINN/ LANE w_. ci I !(BO D - --' � Ijl!IIII ' Il \ L CO DOMINIUMS NIf \--�----- w 1 r - - OQOP�. q I I;�000w Illi .s \ „ _... •. r PIAINW n OVRGE I 1 1 ' , - --- I r� I-PAR ; \ 1 \ , > I __ o _ 'I ;e+000 BK , 1i � -E TA E 1 - r c . —I- \, I � �I / I '� �-i I I �� _l— I�Paa � Pao,E�r NaNN� \ C _ yr S �\ .\Y19y, ... \,•J _.._._..- - -- -.._..__.__ _ PBS ourzn Y - PBS LF BK,JW .. .. Rma„uN NeueEa OM l am' i eazEtsm i O S _ T E G/RA INITIALS 1 , Y;� ✓ Exhibit A I I I ~ Phase 1 L I I - - _..__.._. — - Site Plan •..� BAXTER LANE'IMlnor Arterial) .>--•-�'._ <-'� ...•-....;tKeb7b`. "� �,.. s- .�en�.-.>�,"d..-. ..�:.. ,.,�:`._.,.�e_..�„ "ram, ._ -. �,.- ... ,.. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - � — _.._.._.._.._.. _ _._............................_ _ _.:-.._._.._.._._ _ _.._.._.._. ._._.._.__ .._.._. ._. .__._.._.. _.._ .._ _ _ —__ --- Density Summary L Me UNIT SUMMARY Masts Plan Deslmudon Unit Type K—bear Units Gr...Aor. Gross Density Net Aces Net DendN Res UnR"/• I \ I\ I ! ,\`y\ ,r _.s _�� 32 ESTATE HOMES-Lot Size 120'x110' 1 BED&BREAKFAST Estatel.d. Ent,Ho— 32 24.0ac 1.33dWac 10.23ac. 3,12Mac 19 `\ \ ❑ `� , j `' 1 VETERINARY OFFICE T.anddonel Deodty TmdihnnnlHmne. 19 4.4d au 4.26 dWae 3.23ae 586 du1`ac 17 a CENTE /BREAKFAST I # \ 20 TRADITIONAL HOMES-Lot Size 82.5'x90' /� j RN/COMM Iry (82.5'x91'ON FERGUSON) 1 COMMUNITY CENTER !, \ tt-- Jng 1 EQUESTRIAN CENTER Meeinn Demily Cottage Hamel 40 4.20ac 9.50 dwae 3.27n¢ 122 dwac 25Y. J OA j \ 01236.00 20 VILLAGE HOMES-Lot Size 46'x89' MA=Dendty VIDageHomes/TaaHome 2011 2Adaa 8.60dwac 2.46ac 3,60Wae 13% O a `-_ \\ 40 COTTAGE HOMES-Lot Size 42'x64' Vdleg<Han 10/29/01e. J . PRD6t NEIYWIt PNTI 19 TOWNHOMES Nelotumvnodt•,syeU.e Wmi&loe 7 .30 no 23.3 d,*o 33 ac 2136dc 4 \ ` 20 CONDOMINIUMS Phase One Area: NeigJborhoadMsxedU.e eomkommnn. 20 &lac 247dWno .31. 24.7dWaa 13% 64.66 Acres 7 LIVE/WORK \ I I ✓/ sxar Numw �J �-_•w�, NeighllorkoodI Towolimes 1? 1.45 ac. 13A dwac 1.45ae 111 dwac 13% ��• n _ \\\\\\CD(rOJPOSE i j I /u v ET TaId Plmaal-Rtsddend.1 75N 3768ac. 439dutc 21.75 ac. 71Ada/. Ill A LLA'TIN COU�(TY Note:Net acres does not include parks,open apace or road. �' ` PARK ��•. NOT FOIE C STRUCTION COPYRIGHT 02001 MITHUN,INC. j. ' I Architects+Designers+Planners j — Pier 56 / /�-- I I I I• - 1 I _ I i Ii2ai Aaskan Way Suite 200 y� C Seattle,WA 98rm TEL 2o6 623.3344 - PAR 21G6 623.7005 EOUESTMANLANE --- I I PREPARED Williams Brothers \ —� r-- / � ----T ---- n roc I n 1035 Cerise Road —;----- ---- _ I _I I _ --- O I Billings, Montana 59101 W I \ 1 F 1 ? I PROJECT: BAXTER MEADOWS ROWS- - -- BOZEL STREET- _ LOCATION Bozeman, Montana I I / I— / I i —�- \ 1 BARTER LANE(Minor Arterial) N1J' 0 o - _ _ - - _ - - - - _ - F I a 1 ii � I I 0 SCALE: 1" =! 100' ND a A p p° b q ° °°°.Q, a 6°."'a 6° a66'37 C9 e• B�r 400 I -0. 1_°I 10'.o' j1, ax .1°•.D• 1 ° 1-1 DAVIS ROAD NORTH^OF BAXTER ° (� � 11 1I'1 INITIAL J100 ft R.O.WI .w--.,. Ne•rM°xx °wx,.. ..rw ..x„x.a xw^ex'ax 5._°. pp- .. 10.- Y 5'•0' T-6' 10'-0'� 10'-0• 16-0'II T.S. #5.0 PLANTER DRIVE DRIVE PARKING 6'PLANTER 1.0• maMCE�-e xwtRnM -0 ( IS'_O 7.6 T-O• 18- r'0• � 7.8- 5-OI I WALKWALK 0.. 10'- ' 14.•0. 0 2'-0' SIDE- PLANTER PARKING DRIVE- PARKING 6'PLANTER SIDE- 2'-0' - BK WSIDE-ALK :.PLANTER DRIVE DRIVE PLANTER WALK -0• WALK WALK J. ARABIAN COURT (54 ft R.O.W. A. BAXTER LANE (105 ft R.O.W.Minor Arterial) G. LF,es APPALOOSA COURT (54 ft R.O.W. BF mrr-T EQUESTRIAN LANE (60 ft R.O.W.) . LATIGO AVENUE & BOZEL STREET BELGIAN COURT (54 ft R.O.W.) pid—RAN M.- (60 ft R.O.W.) CYDESDALE COURT (54 ft R.O.W.) Ihl �,.p )B•.D•I ,G-D IIR•.ONte'D•II ,d-D• 15'-0)7'-D' 4• 1Il FJORD COURT (54 ft R.O.W. D'wavu w.x a e..wx. ^� xxw= r-o A I v1iry °a= 'x wx upN KR ro BS,LF,BK,JW WEDI. DAVIS ROAD NORTH OF BAXTER INITIALS FUTURE 1100 ft R.O.W.) a p� a utorrtcr s Till RAGE GARAGE R r ®rs GA I 27'-0' �0'I e10-0' � 10-0' 15'-0'1 .'-0' 34'-0' Exhibit ° Street Sections - I .S B- - S-0 5.0 ZO'-O'_ 10'-0' 10'-0' . 9.-0' 1 10'-0' �,.� SETBACK 2'-0' 14'-0' 2'-0'SETBACK.. uvc w,o�o=x _ QI tKv Punree g• PAwxD Done T.0• oene PARKrxR S' PumeR xme- OPEN- DRIVE DRIVE PAVED-- PloewuK wKK SPACE PLANTER S'MEANDERING T-0' DAVIS ROAD SOUTH OF BAXTER B. FERGUSON AVENUE (00 ft R.O.W.) �. RIATA ROAD (60 ft R.O.W) 0 INITIAL (100 ft R.O.WJ ° H. ALLEY (20 ft R.O.W.) '-o' amp e'PAwxe oxrvx ,'-0.erne xxw�oen nnc DEADMANS GULTCH ROAD INITIAL (90 ft R.O.W.) °°4• a d°4• a ° . 6 °d <? D a s? 01236.00 Q1 a P 10/29/01 ue'-0•I 20'-e' T-0 15'O II oo°'� + 10-0' 115 01 T-D �• 10'-e' (6-01)7'-0' o'-0' '- B 0 0• 0• PxOapi P,1M {L GREEN T•0'a e'Prn.wn eme I'o o=ne I'.0 eue PMw,9 8 - RAxmn lmtRµR m PuxR[ G• PMR�xe Dove A. euve PMRwo e' ruxrtex I� 12'-0 to-s �I 12'-0' 1 T-°' & T-V IF-0-1 ( 15'-0' '10 10'-0' e•-o• I 10.0. .5'•of f DAVIS ROAD SOUTH of BAXTER DEADMANS GULTCH ROAD �,),6'-0•� T-6' -T-O' 10'-0' 10'-0' ( T-O' M T-6'' 15'-0' GREEN 6' DRIVE PARKING 6'PLAN7ER SIDE- 1'•0- PARK 6 DRIVE DRIVE PARKING 1-0 T-0' SIDE• .PUNTER 6'PARK DRWE DRIVE PARKING 6'PLANTER e10e r•D• - WALK 6' PLANTER, SIDE- FUTURE 1100 ft R.O.W.) FUTURE (90 ft R.O.W.) WALK.. ..-WALK .. WALK sx¢r xuuew C. EQUESTRAIN LANE (62 ft R.O.W.) F. GALLATIN GREEN I. BAXTER PARKWAY (60 ft R.O.W.) SET (42 ft R.O.W. EACH SIDE OF GREEN) NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION CDPYfi10HT0200,MITHUN,INC. 4 Q 4 Q i Architects+13esl ners+Planners ............. Pier 56 1201 Naskan Way r Spite 200 szs T��__ _ � i ! Seattle.WA 98101 12as y i - 1 i 3.3344 rAR 206 623.7005 1 .� '•\ l i "b I ®6 �_� 1© bi i ( i \ ` ,'+4 ,4a8 I 1 I I I i . 1 1 FJORD CT. PREPARED FOR: 1 I ,B3 6 ,bez aBr At Williams Brothers 1`Q ,4g0P14 Construction i i ! t 17' \b s s.F. va04 aAee• :\ i i 1035 Cerise Road S.P. 1 1 I i i Billings, Montana 59101 1a7D6 i i i i i i i i i t i S.F. '— 747• ,aD• 10.514 BAXTER MEADOWS VETERINARY y 2 1 i LOCATION:7Aoe 1 s% i i i Bozeman, Montana 1 AC. 9.P. „r 13Aa0 ' j I I I I I I � _ _._.._. _.J L_.._._.._._._.._ _.J I I '% - EQUESTRIAN 11 �'/ ne16.006 CENTER \ s 10 AC. w S.F. 18406 ' / � ! � II I • ; I - - 1 I I i I 1 I I I. I 0EY ttw ff (r /� i B��cs• I i. i - i i � � .i i i I I i i .. i 1 - 470.201 i. B.P. eP° r-"—" 9F. I O i 14aa• uaDo 1 EDl1E6TRIAN LANE � �•� { p \\ O �• ; © ' . _- me w.r wa 60 4 2B I 22 2: 24 25 29 - -- O 2A71 9 5.148 t 2849 S I ! 11'.P eF� 4.41•17� Iq 0 4 pp SI 5. 0 1 010,. 02Y / 13.052 11A05 b 7.02 >II p: S 8.[ I SPy" 6Pg'Lg Sr. I 6P. J�II e.P. ,874 i 8 P4 2.7114 S $ 2686 '�418 \S.F. 7 T Q i7 4 $ $ t.70 rmay{Pry �"j' -� �$teas -7A42- 7.500 �! 1 a I ` 4D�4 1 45 49 LI BF I S.F. I 56 zr i$2.bab�1.086 labs 2B0B 2.abb 35451 L=---J ! '-- —� ,,, •••vvv ¢ B.F. '2 5 6 I ! $ or, 1 I a x239 116A66 tA67 I� 7.416 '� �� L342 t! a 65 4 6�1 b0 4B 4° �44 w�38 E 1O ! I i v.,xwmx wrmx - '1 . '. F 9.F. a S.F. 600 < 55 4 , 4.r x 39 \ ' • B.F. ,010 2A00 P. ¢ ! BK I h I W &P: R T1 2.088 2.683 2.BBa sb°6 2.°68 U' ' ! LaarP_ S.F.'I60 P F i uAwtax $ 2. � a I sa r r d LF,BS Bm ® a sr [it­, 1. 9$ $ ° ! .i marcr xmu Ec, § w 18 17 1B 10 r. ' 6P 53 e 98 3 I bv4 'Dl?i .xobcrS tlwu u.1mw �i 1a54 i® A4 g 7768 7Ae4 LL ^4 tr tl �4 IpgO � �S. F-\\ � I I� B76 9 ® Ytl16P I I ._._.._. F i_ 2.788 I 61 .. - - - - - - - - - - j __rzJ_ � )i BS,LF,BK.JW 1� 9 7.3429} BOZEL STREET INITIALS wx xW I. m F- op. I y s ��{7cR-1'y!/�1.1 S.P. i6IA0f Y 11 10x !. a,fat '(p31 I w ' �' d' 88>�. a,P�.-� \N sP. ✓n`.n'a" "'. �' 71 7 75 74 7S 7B I Tarr \ < J ® el �! 1E 10 1: 1e 1 11 11 . it ql nbu 14 e I I < Manm g 7.746 7AIB 4.069, 4A01, 4.OD1, 4.001,'4,001, 0.00f 4,001 4,D01,4.490 1 4171E 1654 L 7.341 1 li I 1 6.F. rm. '6.R S.F. S� -8F.---7---S.F. _ i I r I e I .9f I ..e ILB�.eJI xV I wp I n'O. :'4. 4814 ® ! ! mb 1 W ur u .. a B.F. ! 1 �Cl a6 11 it i - _ x .. I i 'jD $ ,' 'i Exhibit D r �• 6'".� �: l- $ 7,341 7.507 �j j, i i \�•"�' �"' id eP. aP. 88 8©'6 88 '9 85 '9 B4 B B9 ' © 6f eO ® 1 I � 7A41 r ! .14.004�i4A26144,013144,025144,016 144,02b 144,01 4.02 4470 ' B� $ ! �5 P g haca 1 1. I Br. i SF i SP. i S.F. i S.F. ' BF ' BF S.P. S.F. ? au _._.. . 7 i_.. .. � L.�> I ..�..L�6• I wtl L,Br J..a I ..p•J I 1. 7N' I �, .I Subdivision Plat � EAXTER LANE(Minor Arterial) -- --- - i Map I I I I �m iy i i 1 ! ! 10eApe I j i 01236.00 10/29/01 h I I. I,lacc7 raElean.va,b SCALE: 1' = 100 BEET xume a i I I i SET NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION COPYRIGHT 02001 MITHLIN,INC. J ' CITY BOZEMAN -`DEPA ENT OF PLANNING AND C' _ UNITY DEVELOPMENT V 9� • ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 JV 08 Mo?fir Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net FAXED TRANSMITTAL February 24, 2003 Jeffery Kanning Collaborative Design Architects 2280 Grant Road, Suite C Billings, MT 59108-0467 RE: Baxter Meadows Subdivision, Phase 1 Dear Jeffery, This is to inform you that the Planning Office is proceeding with its review of the partial Final Subdivision Plat and Final P.U.D. Plan applications submitted to this office last week for the Baxter Meadows Subdivision P.U.D., Phase 1. As you are aware. City staff is proceeding with its review of the applications with the understanding that the final plat is still deemed incomplete in terms of the standard 45-day review period set forth by the subdivision regulations. However, as agreed staff will make every effort possible to proceed with review of the submittal as documents and supplemental information are provided this office and move the final plat application forward as quickly as possible. The following comments provided by staff are based on a number of key items that have come to the attention of this office, and are for your immediate consideration in completing both applications. It appears that the preliminary final plat application submitted to the Planning Office last week is not the same subdivision plat that Karin Caroline responded to in her memorandum of February 6, 2003. The preliminary final plat now includes the 85-acre Regional Park (i.e., Tract 3A of C.O.S. 2202A) as part of the final subdivision plat application. Having reviewed this with City staff, the determination has been made that we are unable to file the Regional Park with said final plat application for Phase 1, finding it was not considered as part of the preliminary plat application by the advisory and decision-making bodies. Furthermore, the regional park includes dedicated right-of-way for Davis Street, Oak Street, and Ferguson Avenue that have not been considered by the appropriate review agencies during preliminary plat review (i.e., Sheet 4 of 4). Therefore, in order to keep this final plat application moving forward, staff recommends that the Regional Park and described dedicated rights-of-way be considered with the next phase of the major subdivision. As a result, the final plat application should exclude all exhibits and certificates that make reference to the Regional Park and Gallatin County Commission, as well as any reference in the platting certificate and protective covenants. Staff has discussed this with: Russ McEneray and Claude Meztler at Monday's meeting, and has agreed that this in the best interest of moving the final plat application for Phase One forward for review and approval. Jeffery Kanning—02/24/03 1 planning• zoning • subdivision review annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination Representatives of City staff, the applicant/developer, City of Bozeman Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, YMCA, and For Parks Committee had the opportunity to review the pocket parks and linear park for Phase One. As a result of said meeting, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and James Goehrung agreed to approve the parks and trail system design contingent on; 1) submittal of a maintenance plan for the parklands, 2) approval by Ron Dingman on the playground equipment, 3) grading information on the berming in the pocket parks, and 4) inspection of the landscaping improvements by the City Forester once its installed. The maintenance plan must be submitted to James Goehrung for approval prior to the final plat being approved and should include at a minimum a description of a weed control plan, copy of the irrigation plan, leaf and snow removal, moving schedule, grooming and maintenances schedule. An example of a typical maintenance plan for a similar residential major subdivision will be forwarded shortly for your review. During Monday's meeting of February 24, 2003, City staff and the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board were uncertain that the public pedestrian/bicycle trail system in Phase One was also approved by the City Commission as an equestrian trail. Both the staff and Board expressed concern with regard to the potential conflict of pedestrian, bicycles, and stock all using the same trail system without first giving ample consideration to mitigating potential conflicts between users. Staff has completed a quick overview of the staff report and minutes of the City Commission meeting, and could find nothing that made reference to any discussion on the matter. Unless the applicant can offer specific evidence of approval by the City Commission for the equestrian use of the public trail system during the preliminary plat review, staff recommends that this matter be addressed with the next phase of the subdivision. We understand that Claudia Metzler is looking into this issue and will contact the Planning Office if she is able to find documentation whereby the Commission discussed the matter in detail. During Monday's meeting it was further discussed that as an interim measure to file the final plat that the notation on page L5 be revised to reference a 10-foot wide, Class Il public trail system containing s trail mix of 3/8-inch minus gravel natural fines and 25% clay binder material, with consideration to accommodate possible equestrian users with the next phase of subdivision review. With respect to the two pocket parks and linear park for Phase One, it was pointed out that the financial guarantee to file the final plat would need to include the landscape, landscape irrigation, and trail improvements for Phase One. You will need to also have Teresa Olson provide certification as a licensed landscape architect, or equal, on the landscape plans. Please make sure to include the parkland improvements in the estimated costs for review by James Nickelson in order to establish the appropriate financial guarantee. Staff will advise James accordingly of the matter so he will be looking for it to review and approve. Staff is presently reviewing the certificates against the subdivision regulations, platting certificate, and conditions of preliminary plat approval, and will be providing written comments for Allied Engineering to proceed with preparation of the mylars and signing of the applicable certificates by the end of the week. Please keep in mind that the revisions to the final plat and platting certificate, if not the protective covenants, need to exclude any reference to the Regional Park and dedicated rights-of-way for the three streets referenced above. The City Attorney's Office and Director of Public Service are presently reviewing the utility easement, subsurface drainage easement, and reservation clause on the plat, as well as the Escrow Agreement provided by Jerry Williams. Staff will advise you, Claudia Metzler, and Russ McElyea accordingly as soon as council has advised this office. Jeffery Kanning—02/24/03 2 Please note that the above comments are related to a specific number of items to assist in addressing said issues and do not suggest that staff has completed its review of the preliminary plat and preliminary plan applications. Don't hesitate to contact the Planning Office if you have any questions on the above comments or the subdivision in general, and staff will continue to assist with the review of both applications in anyway possible. Let's continue to keep the channels open. Respectfully, Da v=elton Senior Planner DS/dps Attachments cc: Claudia Metzler,Baxter Realty,P.O. Box 10037, Bozeman, MT 59719 Jerry Williams, Baxter Meadows Development, P.O. Box 11060,Bozeman, MT 59719 Russ McElyea,Moore O'Connell &Refling,P.O. Box 1288, Bozeman, MT 59771 Terry Threlkeld, Allied Engineering Services,Inc., 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 James Nickelson,Morrison Maierle,Inc., 901 Technology Blvd.,Bozeman, MT 59715 Planning File No. P-03005 Jeffery Kanning—02/24/03 3 CITY OF BOZEMAN wog$02� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406) 582-2260 Z 20 East Olive Street le Fax:1883 °�e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 Fax: (406) 582-2263 �N CO.� Bozeman, Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net FAX TRANSMITTAL (Page t of Date: A;;�14?!2 To: P—� 11SS l�•l c '�s, �'1 -���� From: Message: "S Planning zoning subdivision review annexation historic preservation housing grant administration • neighborhood coordination P. 01 TRANSACTION REPORT MAR- 5-03 WED 1 : 12 PM FOR: DATE START RECEIVER TX TIME PAGES TYPE NOTE MAR- 5 1 :05 PM 95879079 T 28" 10 SEND OK IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR BAXTER MEADOWS Pi;D, PHASE I This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this � day of S , 2002, by and between Baxter Meadows LLP, a Montana Limited Partnership, P.O. Box 10037, Bozeman, MT 59771-10037, hereinafter called the "Subdivider", and the City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Montana, with offices at 41.1 East Main Street, P. O. Box 1230,Bozeman, MT 59771-1230,hereinafter called the "City". WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Subdivider to obtain building permits for Baxter Meadows Phase la prior to the installation of all required subdivision improvements in accordance with City of Bozeman Ordinance 1532 and 1533; and WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose of both the Subdivider and the City to hereby enter into an Agreement, which will guarantee the full and satisfactory completion of the required improvements, related with the property hereinafter described; and it is the intent of this Agreement, and of the parties hereto, to satisfy the improvements guarantee requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property Descripnon This Agreement pertains to, and includes, those properties which are designated and identified as being: Baxter Meadows Phase 1a, located in the S %2 of Section 34, T1S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, consisting of 11 proposed lots on the east side of Gallatin Green between Equestrian Lane and Baxter Lane as proposed by the Preliminary Plat of Phase 1 of the Baxter Meadows PUD, subject to all existing easements of record or of fact. 2. Improvements This Agreement specifically includes: a) installation of sewer and water main extensions, b) street improvements c) and related storm water drainage infrastructure improvements. The Estimated Cost of said improvements has been estimated by Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 at nine hundred sixty-six thousand, two BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE 7 -I:�IPItOy'I �lE\TS AC.;RI_FYIEi\'1' 1 . 1 1 . • hundred and ten dollars. ($966,010.00) and is attached and made a part of this Agreement, as Exhibit "A". 3. Financial Guarantee, Time for Completion of Improvements It is the Subdivider's intent with this Agreement to obtain building permits prior to completion of all required subdivision improvements. Therefore, this Agreement shall be secured by a financial guarantee in the form of a Bond issued by Flynn Insurance, Bond No. 965001559 dated August 12th, 2002 in the amount of one million, seven hundred ninety nine thousand, fve hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents ($1799,514.90), which is more than one hundred and fifty (150) percent of the Estimated Cost of said improvements. The financial guarantee shall be in full force and effective until the work is completed by the Subdivider and accepted by the City of Bozeman. Said financial security shall be in the form of a surety bond, certificate of deposit, or cash. The Subdivider hereby agrees that the improvements will be completed within four (4) years of the date of initial Preliminary Plat approval by the City Commission, November 19, 2001, in order to avoid default on the method of security. 4. Inspection Representatives of the City shall have the right to enter upon the property at any reasonable time in order to inspect it and to determine if the Subdivider is in compliance with this Agreement, and the Subdivider shall permit the City and its representatives to enter upon and inspect the property at any reasonable time. 5. Default Time is of the essence of this Agreement. If the Subdivider shall default in or fail to fully perform any of its obligations in conformance with the time schedule under this Agreement, and such default or failure shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice specifying the default is deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Subdivider at P.O. Box 906, Bozeman, MT 59715, or such other address as the Subdivider shall provide to the City from time to time, without being completely remedied, satisfied, and discharged, the City may elect to enforce any of the following specified remedies: BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE 1 -IPIPRO�'1!�iP,\'TS A(:NCFi1IF\'i 2 A) The City may, at its option, declare the financial guarantee to be forfeited and secure the complete construction and inspection of the improvements described .herein. The City's representative, contractors, and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work and inspection, and the Developer shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. In the event that any funds remain from the financial guarantee upon completion of all improvements, such funds shall be promptly returned to the Subdivider. B) The City may enforce any other remedy provided by law. 6. Indemnification The Developer shall indemnify,hold harmless, and defend the City of Bozeman against any and all claims, at Developer's own expense, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of Developer or its agents, employees, or contractors, whether negligent or otherwise, in connection with the performance of work described in this agreement. The City shall be responsible for any claims arising from negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the City or its agents or employees, except the Developer shall be responsible for those claims of negligence and misconduct arising from the Developer, its agents, or employees not providing to the Municipality, its agents or employees, information relevant to the subject matter of this agreement. The parties shall cooperate in the defense of Claims and shall furnish records, information, and testimony and attend proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary. 7. Attorney Fees In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of m-house counsel including City Attorney. BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I--I!NIPROL'EIN11?NTS AGRI_E9.1LNT 3 8. Warranty The Subdivider shall warrant against defects of all improvements and that these improvements are made in a good and workman-like manner for a period of one (1) year from the date of their written acceptance by the governing body. 9. Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Montana. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, venue is in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, State of Montana. 10. Modification or Alterations No modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall valid, unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties hereto. 11. Invalid Provision The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. 12. No Assignment It is expressly agreed that the Subdivider shall not assign this Agreement in whole, or in part,without prior written consent to City. 13. Successors Except as provided in paragraph twelve (12), this Agreement shall be binding upon, enure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 15. Acknowledgement of Increased Risk The Subdivider acknowledges in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532, Section 1.31, recognizes, acknowledges and-assumes the increased risk if loss because certain public services may not exist at the site. 16. Occupancy of Structures The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.h and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.h recognizes and acknowledges that no structures will be occupied or commencement of any used constructed or proposed within the boundary of the PUD or TND will be allowed until BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I - I-'I11.I20VrNIE\TS AGRFEiNWN1' 4 • • required infrastructure improvements have been completed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 17. Incremental Issuance of Building Permits The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d recognizes and acknowledges that building permits may be issued incrementally, dependent on the status of installation of the infrastructure improvements,for Phase 1 a of the Baxter Meadows PUD. 18. Supplemental Fire Hazard and Liability Insurance The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.Ld and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d will provide fire hazard and liability insurance with the City named as an additional insured. LANDONVNER Jerry Williams, General Partner Baxter Meadows Limited Partnership STATE OF MONTANA ) :SS County of Gallatin ) On this 22nd day of -L , 2002, before me a Notary Public of the State of Montana, personally appeared Jerry Williams, known to me to be the general partner of Baxter Meadows Limited Partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing in Improvements Agreement, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE 1 - 1.N1PROV ENIENTS AGIZEENIFNT 5 U�L''L9 Notary Public for the State, of Montana Residing: �� Commission -4 Zor�6 (Notin al)YN� �: THE CITY OF BOZE •. Fes. SEAL 1 %�y • . . . • P?� Debr�H. Arkell , OF MD /1 1 1 1 1%0\ Director of Public Service i STATE OF MONTANA ) t :SS County of Gallatin ) On the day of,,. before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Debra H. Arkell,known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as Director of Public Service of the City of Bozeman, whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above. c Pt (1-f -t Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing: Bozeman, Montana Coznniission.expires: . & / 3 Cv (Notarial Seal; 6A.N-rER MEADOWS PHASE 6 Exhibit A Baxter Meadows Construction Cost Estimate Phase 1a Location _ Utility _ From To From To Length Width Total Unit Price Total Description Description Sta. Sta. (feet) or Dia. Gallatin_Green Sewer main Baxter Equestrian 1000 1907 907 8" 1907 $17.00 $32,419 _SS Service Baxter Equestrian 1000 1907 flea 4"@62' 682 $13.00 $8,866 Manholes _ Baxter Equestrian_ 1000 1907 3 ea 48"_ 3 $1,200.00 $3,600 Extra Depth_ Baxter Equestrian 1000_ 1907_ 20 48" 20 $100.00 $2,000 _ Water main Baxter Equestrian 1011 1721 710 8" 710 $21.00 $14,910 H2O Service Baxter Equestrian_ 1011 1721 11 ea 3/4"@32' 330 $14.00 $4,620 Hydrant Baxter Equestrian _ 1011 1721 2 ea _ 6" 2 $2,500.00 _ $5,000 Blowoff Baxter Equestrian 1011 1721 NA 6" 1 $1,200.00 i$1,200 - Valves _ Baxter Equestrian 1011 _ 1721 710 8" 5 $900.00 $4,500 --- ----- -------- Storm drain_ Baxter Equestrian_ 0 580 580 15" 580 $34.00 $19,720 Storm drain W. edge GG Multifamily _ 107 15" 107 $34.00 $3,638 0 580 Inlet Boxes Baxter Equestrian _- NA 48" 9 $1,600.00 $14,400 Road Baxter Equestrian 1024_ 1700 676 38' 676 $52.25 $35,321 Curb Baxter Equestrian_ 1024_ 1700 1416 6" 1416 $13.20 $18,691 gutter Baxter_ Equestrian 1024 1700 1240 24" 1240 $8.00 _ $9,920 Sewer to connect Phase 1a to Deadmans Sewer main Equestrian Deadman's 1680_ 3658 1978 10" 1978 $19.50 $38,571 Manholes_ Equestrian Deadman's 1680 3593 1913 48" 7 $1,200.00 $8,400_ Extra Depth Equestrian Deadman's 1680 3593 1913 48" 42.45— $100.00_ $4,245 _ _ ! Access road _ Equestrian Deadman's 1680_ 3593_ 1913 12'_ 1978 $10.00 $19,780 Sewer to connect Phase 1a on Deadmans from Gallatin Green to Lift Station Sewer main Equestrian Deadman's 4245 5153 _ 908 18" 908 $19.50 $17,706 Manholes Equestrian Deadman's 4245 5153_ 908 48" 4 $1,200.00 $4,800 Extra Depth Equestrian Deadman's 4245 5153 908 48" 29.54 $100.00 $2,954 • _ Access road Equestrian Deadman's 4245 5153 _ 908 12' 908_ $10.00 $9,080 Lift Station to connect Gallatin Green to Davis Lift Station NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 $167,656.00 $167,656 Deadman's Building _ _ NA NA_ NA_ NA NA NA 1 __$20,000.00 $20,000 _~ Deadman's_ Force Main Lift Station Davis _0 1140_ 1140 12" 1140 $22.00 $25,080 Access road Lift Station Davis 0 1140 1140 12' 1140 $10.00 $11,400 36" RCP Arch Spring Ditch_ NA NA NA NA 36" 116 $122.00 $14,152 36" RCP Arch Section Ditch I NAI NAI NA 1 36" 130 $122.00 $15,860 Exhibit A Baxter Meadows Construction Cost Estimate Phase 1 a ' Location _ Utility From To From To Length Width Total Unit Price Total Description Description Sta. Sta. (feet) or Dia. Gallatin Green Water to complete loop from Phase 1a to Davis _Equestrian Equestrian Water main Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429 1827 -602 __ 10" 02 6 _ $23.00 $13,846 Equestrian Valves Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429_ 1827 -602 10" 4— $1,100.00 $4,400 — Equestrian Fittings _ Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429 1827 -602 10x8 cross 1 $500.00 $500 ...--Equestrian.Fittings — _ Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429 1827 -602 10x8 Tee 3 $400.00 $1,200 Equestrian Fittings Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429_ 1827 -602_12x10 cross 1 $600.00 $600 _____ Equestrian Access road Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429 1827 -602 12' 602 $10.00 $6,020 _Equestrian Hydrants _ __ Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429 1827 _ -602 NA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000 , _Ferguson Blowoffs Gallatin G. Ferguson 2429 1827 -602_ NA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200 Ferguson Water main Ferguson Deadman's_ 1691 3672 1981 _ 12"_ 1981 $ . 25.00 $49,525 Ferguson Valves Ferguson Deadman's _1691 3672 _ 1981 12"_ 6 $ 1,200.00 $7,200 Ferguson Fittings _ _ Ferguson Deadman's _— 1691 _ _3672 _1981 12x8 Tee 1 $ 500.00 $500 Ferguson Fittings— Ferguson Deadman's 1691 3672_ 1981 12x12 Tee 1 $ 850.00 _ $850 Ferguson Access road Ferguson Deadman's 1691 3672_ 1981 12' 1981 $ 10.00 $19,810 _ Deadman's _Hydrants Ferguson Deadman's 1691 3672 1981 NA 1 $2,500.00 __$2,500 — Deadman's Water main _ Ferguson _ Davis 3633 6267 2634 _ 12" 2634 $ 25.00 $65,850_ Deadman's _Valves _ Ferguson Davis_ 3633 6267 2634 12"_ 5 1,200.00 $6,000 Deadman's Fittings _ _ Ferguson Davis 3633 6267_ 2634 12x12 Cross 1 650.00 $650 Deadman's Access road Ferguson Lift Station 3633 Lift Station 1494 12' 1494 $10.00 $14,94_0 _ Deadman's Hydrants_ _Ferguson Davis 3633 6267 2634 NA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000 `_ ___Blowoffs Ferguson Davis 3633 6267_ 2634 NA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200 Storm sewer from Phase 1a to detention pond Equestrian - __ Equestrian Storm Drain Gallatin G. East Alley 824 _738 -86 15" 86 $ 34.00 $2,924 East Alley Inlet Boxes Gallatin G. East Alley 824_ 738 -86 48" 1 $ 1,600.00 $1,600 • -.---.--,East Alley Storm Drain Equestrian Bosal 0_ 180 180 15" 180 $ 34.00 $6,120 South Alley Inlet Boxes _Equestrian Bosal 0 180 180 48" 1 $ 1,600.00 $1,600 South Alley Storm Drain Bosal Alley Bend 0 25 25 15" 25 $ 34.00 $850 ___Equestrian Inlet Boxes Bosal Alley Bend 0 25 25 48" 1 $ 1,600.00 $1,600 Equestrian Storm Drain East Alley _West Alley 738 365 -373_ 18" 373 $ 36.00 $13,428 _ _Equestrian Inlet Boxes East Alley West Alley_ 738 365_ -373 60" 1 $ 3,000.00 $3,000_ _ _Equestrian Storm Drain _ West Alley Ferguson 365 278 -87 21" 87 $ 37.00 $3,_219 _ Equestrian Inlet Boxes _ _West Alley Ferguson 365 278_ -87 60" 3 $ 3,000.00 _$9,000 Equestrian Storm Drain IFerguson Lasso 278 0 -278 27" 278 $ 40.00 $11,120 Exhibit A Baxter Meadows Construction Cost Estimate Phase 1a ' __ Location _____Utility _ From To From To Length Width Total Unit Pr_ic_e _ Total Description Description Sta. Sta. (feet) or Dia. Gallatin Green _ __ _Equestrian Inlet Boxes Ferguson Lasso_ 278 0 -278 60" 3 $ 3,000.00 $9,000 Equestrian Storm Drain Lasso Det. Pond 844 0 _ -844 27"_ 844 $ 40.00 $33,760 Inlet Boxes _Lasso Det. Pond 844_ 0 -844 60" 4 $ 2,000.00 $8,000 Det. Pond _ _ 1 $14,229.00 $14,229 Second Road Acess for Phase 1a Road- Eq. Lane G. Green Ferguson 1822 2419 597 29' 597 $39.88 $23,808 Curb& Gutter G. Green _Ferguson _- 1822 2419 597_ _ 1194_ $8.00 $9,552 Road-Ferg. Lane Eq. Lane Baxter 1680_ 1050 -630 45' 630 $61,88 $38,984 Curb& Gutter Eq. Lane Baxter _ 1680_ 1050 -630 1260 8 $10,080 East Alley South Alley Pavement Bosal Equestrian 0 340 340 20' 340 $27.50 $9,350 Bosal for Access to: Pavement Bosal Bend in Alley 0 105 105 20' 105 $27.50 $2,888 Road- Eq. Lane G. Green Ferguson 0 122_ 122 29' 122 $39.88 $4,865 Curb & Gutter G. Green Ferguson 0 122 122 24" 244 $8.00 $1,952 Total Estimated Construction Costs $966,210 1.5 Times Estimated Construction Costs $1,449,315 September 19, 2001 To: Jerry Williams, Williams Brothers Construction, LLC Fr: R. Dale Beland AIA, AICP Re: Baxter Meadows: Review Comments Phase I PUD Concept Plan and Major Subdivision Pre-application Cc: Andy Epple AICP, Director; Department of Planning & Community Development Phill Forbes, P.E.; Morrison&Maierle The following comments have been received from DRC members as noted: Neil Poulsen, Building Official: 1. A detailed site grading plan is to be prepared as part of the final site plan process. 2. A complete soils analysis and foundation installation recommendations created by a Montana registered engineer for each phase of construction will be required when initial building plans are submitted for that phase. 3. Building foundation elevations are to be staked and certified by a Montana registered engineer prior to foundation wall inspections unless the adjacent street curb is installed and initial site grading is completed. 4. Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued on buildings and structure until written approval has been received from the Planning, Engineering and Water/Sewer Departments. Mike Certalic,Water/Sewer Superintendent: 1. Phasing of this development shall include full time vehicle access to all water and sewer infrastructure for maintenance. 2. All water mains exceeding 500' shall be looped. 3. Termination of water mains for each phase shall not include a value as shown in the concept plan. Extensions of these mains shall begin with a valve. 4. Symbols for fire hydrants;water valves, water mains, etc. shall be consistent with City of Bozeman Modifications to the Montana Public Works Standards. The Concept Plan does not identify accordingly. 1 0 5. The Sanitary Sewer Concept Plan.does not clearly identify lift stations and/or force mains. The legend does not label these correctly. 6. The City of Bozeman recognizes the need for and will maintain a centralized sanitary sewer lift station that is in accord with an expanded wastewater facilities plan which includes this development. However, the City will not sustain costs of maintaining satellite lift stations to enable development if sites that cannot be served by a gravity sanitary sewer collection system. Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service: 1. Per the terms of the annexation, the developer was advised that the first phase of this development will rely heavily of the North 19t'Avenue/Baxter Lane intersection. Prior to final plat approval for Phase I, the developer shall provide the city with a payback of$ 42,500 (to be confirmed) for a share of the costs of the recently constructed signal. 2. Based on the outcome of a traffic analysis, improvements to Baxter Lane may be required. 3. The Annexation Agreement must be approved by the Commission prior to plan and spec approval. 4. If improvements are going to occur on County roads (Davis and Baxter), the plans and specs must also be approved by the County Road Superintendent. 5. Water rights or cash-in-lieu thereof must be paid prior to final plat approval of Phase I. 6. Will amendments to the water/wastewater facility plans be needed for Phase I? If so,they should be required to be submitted with the preliminary plat application. 7. The terms of the annexation require the developer to dedicate or offer to sell to the City, at pre-development value, 10 to 15 acres for use of a public service complex or public service/fire station complex. Neither the concept plan or pre-app plat show such an item 8. The submittal indicates a sewage lift station is required for phase I development. Thus, we need to determine if a special maintenance district is needed to cover the expense of the operations and maintenance of the facility. If required, the district must be formed prior to final plat approval. 2 9. An 80-foot r/w is proposed for Ferguson. The recently adopted 2001 Transportation Plan requires 90-feet r/w for collectors. I believe the Commission supported the acquisition of the required r/w, even if the street standards were reduced. Thus, I do not support the reduction in the r/w width. Further, the standard shown does not comply with any of the recommended standards of the Plan. AS this is the first development to challenge the r/w and design recommendations of the Transportation Plan, I think we should be very careful about accepting deviations. With that said, I believe there are other designs that can be considered, as long as the standards are met for driving lane width, sidewalks, and boulevards. Again, I don't support reduction in the r/w widths. 10. Same comments regarding r/w width for residential street (58-feet), neighborhood green r/w(only 42-feet), and equestrian court (48-feet). The design standard is very similar to that recommended in the Plan. The 60-foot r/w should be obtained, and the Plan standard utilized. 11. Baxter Lane, a minor arterial- proposed design doesn't match up with any in the Plan, but does combine some features. Will bike/sidewalk be on the north or south side? I propose the north, so it's adjacent to the Phase I development. 12. A 20-foot wide alley, with garages setback only 2-feet, will make for interesting snow removal(which will be done by an owners' association, and not the city). 13. Clarify their comment "Baxter Meadows will be responsible for the construction of only the west half of Davis Road"? Need to clearly identify "west half'. 14. The location of the proposed round-about should be thoroughly discussed. Is it an effective location, or would it be better at the intersection of major streets? 15. Bike lane/pedestrian path being shared. Pros and cons. Is one of the recommended designs for collectors & arterials? 16. Preliminary plat should show a"no direct access from lots to Baxter and Davis"note. 17. The application doesn't show water and sewer services. The preliminary plat Must. They'd discussed at one time the equestrian area not being served by City services. If not, the preliminary application must fully explain what type of services will be provided. 3 j The following comments were supplied by-Morrison-Maierle, as,consultant to the City: 'Streets: 1. The permanent dead end road does not comply with the cul-de-sac or t-turnaround requirement (16.16.010 E). 2. The north end of the one-way couplet transition to a two-way street may function better if it occurred at mid-block; alternatively, continue couplet north through more of the project. Uverguson is identified as a collector and therefore the right-of-way and street section should match those specified in the Transportation Plan. The right-of- way width should be increased to 90 feet. A one-foot centerline striping area should be added and provisions for bikes should be added on both sides of the road. �► The width of the improvements on Baxter should match the Transportation Plan. Either the 2, 3 or 5 lane section should be utilized with the number of lanes being dependent on future traffic projections. If the 2-lane option is the preferable option based on traffic projections,the lane width needs to be increased to 11 feet and provisions for bikes needs to be made on both sides of the road. 5. Street sections E and F are non-standard ditch section roads. IN the past, these types of roads have been required to be privately maintained. 6. Street section G meets the local k street standard called out in the Transportation Plan wit the exception of the boulevards are each one foot narrower than specified. 7. It is noted that the alleys provide the only vehicular access to the cottage Homes. Does the City have any alley standards?Need to show that City garbage collection trucks can negotiate alley corners, or punch ends of the east-west alley through to street. 8. Street section I matches the local standard called out in the Transportation Plan with the exception that no parking is allowed on the park side of the street. 9. Street section J is a non-standard width. 10. The Davis street section shown on the pre-application plan is different that the recommended section of a 5' sidewalk, a 8.5"boulevard, a 2' curb and gutter section, 2-12' lanes, a 6"curb and a 9' center median. 4 11. Does the equestrian area need a secondary access?Note that the next phase of the equestrian area will have an access to Baxter. May need temporary turn arounds at ends of Equestrian Loop Road, although not recommended at this time. 12. Who will be responsible for maintenance of the roads and alleys? 13. A modem roundabout is not a traffic-calming device, as stated in the narrative. Published literature on roundabouts indicates locations with heavy flows on the major road and low flows on the minor road are unfavorable for roundabouts. Storm Water Issues: 1. As part of the preliminary plat submittal, 100-year flood elevations should be computed for the Spring Ditch and the Baxter-Border Ditch, and the limits of flooding identified. 2. The Baxter-Border Ditch should be relocated to be outside of the Baxter Lane right-of-way. 3. All ditch easements and setbacks need to be shown on the preliminary plat. 4. The preliminary plat application needs to include a detailed grading plan. Sewer: 1. The proposed depth of the Davis Lane Interceptor is not adequate for lateral mains to be installed. 2. The sewer mains in the equestrian area should be extended to Baxter Lane in order to allow for service to be extended to the south. The sizing of the lift station and the sewer mains in the areas should take this into account. (16.14.1QOD) 3. How does the applicant propose to serve the Cottage Homes, Condominium Units and the Town Homes with sewer, keeping in mind a need to access manholes with a large flusher truck? 4. Are the proposed main depths adequate to provide service to all of the units? Water: 1. The waterline in Davis should be"12". 5 2. Water lines in the area of the equestrian lots need to extend to the south boundary of the subdivision. 16.14.1.20 F Parks: 1. The pocket parks should be identified with the application. Given their size, they are most appropriately privately owned and maintained. 2. Ownership and maintenance responsibility for the Equestrian Open Space should be identified with the application. General Issues: 1. The proposed development. Especially the Cottage Homes, will require nonstandard utility easements. Due to the anticipated development schedule, the applicant should get utility company agreement on the location of all non- city utilities. 3. The zone code requires that one-way accesses be a minimum of 16 feet and two-2ay accesses be a minimum of 24 feet. Affects access to the Townhomes internal lot, etc. 4. Will there be a separate review and approval process for the multi-family and mixed-use areas/buildings? Comments received from the Design Review Board included the following: 1. Concern about perceived segregation of housing by block. Would prefer more mixing of housing types per block. 2. Need to address alley accessibility re snow removal. Reduce density to allow accommodation of storage and parking? 3. Assure affordability by means of deed restriction or other means. 4. Need streetscape variety. Include street elevations to show diversity and mix of housing types. (When draft minutes of the DRB meeting are available, they will be forwarded for your review.) Chuck Winn, Bozeman Fire Department: 1. Most, if not all, of the proposed project lies outside of our desired six(6) minute response time. Until such time as the Bozeman Fire Department is 6 1 able to increase personnel and either relocate or build another fire station to.. adequately,serve this project, all inhabitable structures shall be protected:by approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. 2. At the time Bozeman Fir Department becomes responsible for fire and life safety services, all fire hydrants required by City of Bozeman regulations, including the Uniform Fire Code, shall be installed prior to commencement of combustible construction. Should the developer wish to begin the project without annexing, he will be subject to the requirements of the local fire department in his jurisdiction. However, all conditions listed herein musts be met prior to annexation into the City of Bozeman. 3. We are willing to look at proposals for individual phases based on changing conditions. Andy Epple AICP, Director of Planning& Community Development notes that simultaneous development of project increments and appropriate infrastructure must be consistent with Ordinances# 1532 and# 1533. Those regulations have been designed to accommodate"fast-track"development such as Baxter Meadows. Baxter Meadows comments 91901.doc 7 SEED 19 2UC1 Baxter Meadows Response to Staff Comments 9/7/2001 C BY MVT4UN) Concern 9. In order to comply with the 2001 Transportation Plan, we propose to widen Fereuson's ROW from 80' to 90'. The additional 10' would come from 5' behind back edge of sidewalk. Concern 10. We will change the Residential ROW to 60'. In order to maintain a neo- traditional streetscape we would propose to add 1' of ROW behind the sidewalks. We would like to keep the Neighborhood Green ROW at 42'. This would allow a 10' one- way traveling lane and a 7' on-street parking area. These dimensions are similar to other streets throughout the neighborhood. We will change.the Equestrian Court to provide. two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for on-street guest parking, therefore we will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. Concern 11. The traffic-calming device on Baxter would be designed as a traffic circle and not a round-about. We agree that a round about is engineered to manage the merging of very large traffic volumes. Our goal is to slow down traffic speeds along Baxter. This neo-traditional neighborhood has been designed with homes fronting on Baxter Lane. We strongly believe that defining the character of Baxter Lane early with a traffic- calming device will provide for a safer pedestrian-oriented streetscape for the neighborhood. We will change reference from round-about to traffic circle. A report from Institute ofTransportation Engineers (ITE)District 6, July 20-23, 1997 reported that in addition to reducing accidents, they found traffic circles are effective at reducing vehicle speed without reducing significantly reducing traffic volume. We would like to see the bike path on the south side of Baxter Lane allowing possible connections and increasing its relationship with the Regional Park System. In addition, we feel that this is a safer location for the bike trail because the trail would cross fewer intersections. Concern 12. We are proposing a 20-alley row with 24' clearance between units. In addition we will maintain an 18' interior radius to allow proper maneuverability for garbage trucks. Concern 14. We feel that the location of the traffic circle is in the proper location. Our goal is to calm traffic along Baxter Lane and increase safety for children and other residents. In addition, we do not want to discourage traffic along Davis Road by placing a traffic calming devol on Baxter and Davis. Concern 15. Inside the residential neighborhood we advocate that sidewalks and bike paths be shared. It distances the bicyclist from the traveling automobile and provides a safer environment for children. However, we realize the need for the serious biker who relies on a bike path system as a primary mode of transportation. We will provide bike lanes along larger roads like Davis and Baxter. i. In-response to a letter dated 9/12/01: Streets: The reason the road servicing the Traditional Homes does not connect to Baxter Lane is to allow a green belt and a horse trail connection to the equestrian open space. In addition, the dead end road will be 150' or less to accommodated proper fire truck access while not requiring a cul-de-sac. One-way road we will add comments We will increase.Ferguson's ROW to 90', however we M11 be.requesting a deviation from providing a bike lane on both sides of Ferguson. We would like to, as much as possible, maintain a neighborhood/pedestrian scale on Ferguson. We fell that providing an additional bike lane and increasing the width and pavement of Ferguson would deviate from a neo-traditional development. Also in order to maintain the proper scale of Ferguson, we would rather not provide a 1' center strip down the center of the road. In Phase One, single family and town house units are planned along Baxter Lane. We narrowed the driving lanes to 10' to reduce the traffic speed and increase safety along Baxter Lane. We strongly feel that 10' driving lanes and a traffic circle will benefit the neighborhood from both an aesthetics and safety point of view. Please see additional response to C0/1ce171 11 above. Street sections E and D are designed as country roads. In these areas the neighborhood transitions towards the equestrian area. We are proposing a 20-alley row with 24' clearance between units. In addition we will maintain an 18' interior radius to allow proper maneuverability for garbage trucks. We will change the Equestrian Court to provide two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for guest on-street parking. We will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. We will chance street section G to 60'. In order to maintain a neo-traditional streetscape we would propose to add 1' of ROW behind the sidewalks. Alley Garbage Standards we will add comments Street Section 1 we will add comments We will change the Equestrian Court to provide two 10' driving lanes and provide an additional 6' for on-street guest parking. We will change the Equestrian Court ROW to 54'. Davis Street—we -",ill add comments The equestrian area will have secondary access via a gravel road. The maintenance of roads and alleys we ii,ill add comments Please see response to Concern 11. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL AND A PUD MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given of public hearings/meetings to be held before the BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on`Tuesday, October 30, 2001, at 9:00 a.m.; before the DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, October 30, 2001, at 3:00 p.m.; before the PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday,November 6, 2001, at 7:00 p.m.; and before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, November 19, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. All public hearings/mectings will be held in the Commission Meeting Room, City IIall, 4.11 East Main, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public hearings is to consider a request for approval of a preliminary plan for the Phase I planned unit development of the Baxter Meadows project, and a request for approval of a major subdivision preliminary plat, as proposed by the property owner, WBC LP, .1035 Ccrise Road, Billings, MT 59101. The subject property is 460.2971 acres described as that part of the southwest quarter and all of the southeast quarter of Section 34, Township 1 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., and the northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 ]East of P.M.M. Gallatin County, Montana. A more detailed legal description and map is available at the City Planning& Community Development Department. The property is generally bounded on the east by Davis Lane, on the south by future Oak Street, on the west by Harper Puckett Road, and on the north by future Deadman's Gulch. The proposed Phase I PUD preliminary plan consists of a 65-acre mixed-use development to include up to 156 residential dwelling units and related open space, commercial and office uses. The proposed preliminary plat defines the lots and blocks to accommodate the Phase I development. In addition, generalized design guidelines for future phases of the project will be considered.'. Public testimony will be taken at the public hearings. Written comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Plaruung & Commwuty Development Department Office, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Data pertaining to the application may be reviewed in the Planning & Community Development Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2360. For.those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Baxter Meadows Baxter Meadows Phase 1 PUD/MS notice 10/14/01 0 a •G CL d Its R-3 0 i � 1T1Ti nrn �. Q 1F!w.:;ey Li _ _ _ ,o+�..>.�dm..__._..__._.._..,. .... .. .. .,,. _.. ,.,...:,.y...�-,,.. :. ,•µ�, -' "s F" ... t Al lam '`i„]J Y •. :. ,>.�. Y 1 1 � 's"'1_. I I ' � y�yj F 4 �SJ,y,�i�d fft� , Pf�i 44 } f rTl- Zia- : t .t 7 PPP 'I C f `/ I.. -: - - i. �w•TI I �!-_ �'.�_M1V' I _I I _— �.- I _� _ h�r A: - _ - - - - vw �4t,i., ..,_ - - � I I _ -.' - - I- •,ice ri n e n di �7hs�4F, 7 $, h>y ¢ .a I k i :0.+�5HI .\ - � I � .� �yI _I.. � �.. � .If .1—+_a,L- � - 1 ,,•li i�khr #: ��� ti ,.�lii xt' - .. /1 'ks°- 'I I ` �sl�• I �+� j I I � 11i �I i�,.�•+'rx''R y i8 :�{�al., A0. 175n;'. x j��� �•. � i` , < I - ir' t as ". n,rr,;jIT: L rqI I,i ;.'t 1 I� r iri Ir I »r _ II u � �r'. I ,,. I ,I . ) _-: �•'' I ���: III N• t T i d - �.��A@ -I- I I j- �I II ' 'Yjt�.f r L ':��r. l y ) i 1 I l"t -_-_- uj roa'(t' ' -- --Ll 0- ----- ------ ----------------------------- Ilk k ----- -- - -------- ----- __ ---- - ------ - - =-- -------- ------ -- __ - - - - - -- DPA*14 : 9" d }}�� _ # ! LE�.r-"f//� N�✓ I TOTAL.AREA P14ABE 1-�6b4 ACRES ,t yz CkECKFOa eye °.17"EOL LOCATION TOTAL TTF'£ CATALOG ARM FIe,ADb I k3raT ccrkkl. BrACINM `\ �' �����CSSS �-j �' _ ,l I ' b , r 1t r LAMP PUT. L.�1.16!! ARMrOL!/H'T. PeN. PttE` ODAv ' DAXTMLANM 71 rl hS-ttH-DMMV-SW-V-CMIA-~-2V-eCTX 2- 1 Io' eTAOSERlD lie' -� \ j i'y r b` f9lle6UeON 1m.lOLEefRIAN WAY 62 PI lom-Pn+-txiebe-ws-v-ohnA-en�P-le-dcTx t' -1 nn' BTAc:eeD ea' \ CDtt r,�.,il{; roeJtir,}'�rots,w �^' +` �' - LATW AVE,bom eT,mATA RD. \ \ rF r s rt '� +' r +7,� ' r x C 44 r1 1e-MH-Ohte79e-e61-V-OMIA-erwR-l6-dCTX t' - 1 nb' eTAMMIRE'D IID' '7� # �j�` �✓ �[� CELGIJW Cl.CLYDE 6DALE CT.FJORD CT. �'. WLLATIM GldM 80D. 15 PM 1e-M4-0MBbD-e6I-V-OMA-eM6P•le-dCTX 4' 1 11b cm e1DLD e4'2 'IN t SITE LIC�NTfNc'� FLAN itvf IRS T - •' '.::. �. r ,n " DRAFT Memorandum To: Development Review Committee From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Planner Date: December 2, 2003 — Second Week Review DRAFT Conditions Subject: Baxter Meadows Phase II MaSub Preliminary Plat#P-03042 Baxter Meadows Phase II PUD Preliminary Plan# Z-03276 Preliminary Plat Planning Subdivision Specific Conditions-Phase IIA: 1. If concurrent construction_ is approved, the applicant shall submit a concurrent construction plan that addresses all aspects of 16.22.030. Concurrent construction shall be limited to 2. Lot 2, Block 16, Lot 9, B._ock 18 and Lot 3, Block 20 shall be restricted by deed to use as "parking", and shall be a minimum of 66f et in width. 3. 'Lot 1, Block 16 shall be designated as "parking" and Lots 1, 2, 7, 8, Block 20 shall be designated as "parking garage" but Arith written verification may be exchanged with other lots of equal size and usability. 4. One-foot wide "no access" strips shall be placed along Baxter Lane, as appropriate to preclude direct lot access onto Baxter Lane. 5. One-foot wide "no access: strips shall be shown on the final plat for all rights-of-way intersections pursuant to Section 16.16.,070.????? 6. Tracts 1 A and 1 B shall be restricted by deed to no building until further subdivision has been approved to provide such :.pings as appropriate access and park dedication. -- 7. A 50' watercourse setback pursuant to Section 16.14.170 shall be clearly delineated on the final plat, and shall include all adjacent wetlands. Planning Subdivision Specific Conditions-Phase IIB: 8. A 35' watercourse setback_ pursuant to Section 16.14.170 shall be clearly delineated on the final plat, and shall include all adjacent wetlands. Planning Subdivision Specific Conditions-Phase IIC: 1 DRAFT 9. A 50' watercourse setback pursuant to Section 16.14.170 shall be clearly delineated on the final plat, and shall include all adjacent wetlands. 10. Lot 3, Block 17, Lot 8, Block 19 and Lot 3, Block 21 shall be restricted to use as "parking", and shall be a minimum of 66 feet in width. 11. One-foot wide "no access" strips shall be shown on the final plat for all rights-of-way intersections pursuant to Section 16.16.070.????? Planning Subdivision Specific Conditions-All Phases: 12. Documentation of satisfaction of park dedication requirements in accordance with Section 16.14.100 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations shall be provided. For residential units, 0.03 acres per dwelling unit shall be dedicated for parkland. For non-residential (unless restricted to non- residential uses by deed) and multi-family, 11% of the total square feet of lot area shall be dedicated for parkland. 13. Applicant shall submit a formal development plan for the design of the dedicated parkland(s) for review and approval by the Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board, signed by a certified landscape architect. Details of plantings, species, topography, irrigation system, and any permanent park features shall be shown and discussed with the plan. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board regarding the final design prior to submittal of the formal development plan for review and approval by the City Commission. 14. Applicant shall submit a formal development plan for the design of the dedicated parkland(s), for review and approval by the City Commission, signed by a certified landscape architect. Details of plantings, species, topography, irrigation system, and any permanent features shall be shown and discussed with the plan. Approval of the City Commission shall be obtained prior to installation of any improvements. The approved development plan shall be provided with the final plat. 15. Applicant shall submit a formal development plan for the design of all parkland(s), open space, watercourse setback, boulevards, pedestrian walks/pathways and center area for review and approval by the Superintendent of Facilities and Lands, signed by a certified landscape architect. Details of plantings, species, topography, irrigation system, and any permanent features shall be shown and discussed with the plan. Approval of the Superintendent of Facilities and Lands shall be obtained prior to installation of any improvements. The approved development plan shall be provided with the final plat. 16. Applicant shall be responsible for installation of all parkland(s), open space, watercourse setback, boulevards, pedestrian walks/pathways and center area related improvements. Construction of the improvements will be to the City standards and must be completed with City oversight. 17. Applicant shall be responsible for installing sod, boulevard trees, and an irrigation system in the public right-of-way boulevard strips and medians along all external subdivision streets and adjacent to parkland(s), open space, watercourse setback, pedestrian walks/pathway and center areas pursuant to Section 16.14.110 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. 2 DRAFT 18. All landscaped common areas shall have an underground irrigation system installed in compliance with City standards and specifications. The applicant shall provide irrigation system as-builts in accordance with Section 16.08.090. 19. Maintenance of common areas and facilities such as parkland(s), open space, rights-of-way, pedestrian walks/pathways and center area, etc. shall be provided by the developer and/or homeowners' association in accordance with Section 16.14.130. 20. The Final Plat shall contain the following language that is readily visible with lettering on the plat at a minimum width of '/ inch in height, placing future landowners of individual lots on notice of the presence of high groundwater in the area of the subdivision: "Due to relatively high ground water table within the areas of the subdivision, it is not recommended that residential dwellings with full basements be constructed without first consulting a professional engineer. If daylight basements are incorporated in the construction of residential dwellings, they should not have a depth greater than three (3) feet below the top of the curb or crown of the street from which it is served." 21. Applicant shall provide a soils report, along with building plans, to the Building Division, recommending types of foundations. If development shall occur in phases, the soils report may address those lots within the proposed phase. 22. Subdivision lighting shall be incorporated into the subdivision by one of the following: a) the subdivider shall install street and pathway lighting throughout the subdivision pursuant to Section 16.14.230 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. Lighting shall be maintained by means of the Property Owners' Association through Protective Covenants; or b) the subdivider shall participate in a Street Improvement Lighting District (SILD) for the provision of street and pathway lighting pursuant to Section 16.14.230 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. All subdivision lighting provided shall conform to Section 16.14.230 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. A lighting plan including isofootcandle plots and description of the proposed equipment, with details and specifications (cut sheets), bulb type and size, and locations shall be provided with the final plat and subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. 23. Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds. A signed copy of this Understanding must be provided to the Planning Department. 24. A declaration of covenants for this subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat which specifically includes the provisions from Section 16.34.030. A draft of these covenants must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to filing and recordation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. 25. Prior to final plat approval, a property owners' association shall be established for maintenance of all subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways and trails, boulevards and medians, alleys, storm water facilities and/or parks pursuant to Section 16.34.020. A draft of these documents must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to filing and recordation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. 26. Prior to final plat approval, a common area and facility maintenance plan and guarantee shall be provided for the permanent care and maintenance of commonly owned open spaces, recreational 3 0 • , DRAFT areas, facilities, private streets and alleys, and parking lots. The same shall be submitted to the city attorney and shall not be accepted by the city until approved as to legal form and effect. A draft of these documents must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to filing and recordation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. 27. The landowner agrees to provide the City with a payback of$1 S 000 per the payback schedule dated May 10, 2001, for the North 19`h Avenue/Baxter Lane sipnalization Of this total payback the landowner agarees to pay $2,072 to the Cityprior to final plat approval for Phase 1 of the development. 28. Executed waivers of right to protest creation of special improvement districts (SIDs) for a park maintenance district shall be filed and of record with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder prior to final plat approval. A copy of the filed documents shall be submitted with the final plat. 29. Executed waivers of right to protest creation of special improvement districts (SIDs) for the following future improvements: Baxter Lane, Deadman's Gulch/North 19`h Avenue signal improvements, and North 19`h Avenue improvements shall be filed and of record with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder prior to final plat approval. A copy of the filed documents shall be submitted with the final plat. 30. Water rights, or cash-in-lieu thereof, shall be provided and paid for prior to final plat approval. If the final plat of the subdivision is filed in phases, water rights will only be required for each phase as the final plat for that phase is filed: The amount of water rights required will be determined by the Director of Public Service based on the proposed final plat(s). 31. Any remainder parcel(s) from the original tract(s) of record of this property of less than 160 acres shall be included in this subdivision as tract(s) restricted by deed to no building until further subdivision has been approved to provide such things as appropriate access and park dedication. 32. Update Community Impact Report????? 33. Any unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State of Montana. 34. The following statement shall appear on the final plat. "The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm, or corporation, whether public or private, providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas, internet or cable television service to the public, the right to the joint use of an.easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of their lines and other facilities in, over, under and across each area designated on this plat as `Utility Easement' to have and to hold forever." Planning Code Provisions: 35. The Final Plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were 4 DRAFT received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The Final Plat application shall include four (4) signed reproducible copies on a 3 mil or heavier stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 3-1/2" floppy disk; and five (5) paper prints. 36. Conditional approval of the Preliminary Plat shall be in force for not more than three calendar years, as provided by State statute. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. 37. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the Preliminary Plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the Final Plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements 38. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary. plat approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Preliminary Plan Planning Zoning Specific Conditions-Phase IIA: 1. If concurrent construction is approved, the applicant shall submit a concurrent construction plan that addresses all aspects of 16.22.030. Concurrent construction shall be limited to 2. Applicant shall construct all surface parking spaces (including on-street, Lot 2, Block 16, Lot 9, Block 18 and Lot 3, Block 20) prior to occupancy of any structure. Construction shall include but not be limited to continuous concrete curbs, concrete or asphaltic concrete, striping, drive approach, landscaping, and irrigation. Parking lot plans in compliance with Bozeman Zoning Ordinance shall be provided with the final plan and subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. 3. Each site plan review shall include an up-to-date calculation, based on a requirement of 1.72 spaces per 1,000 s.f. net floor area, of the existing parking spaces allocated to previous site plans, parking spaces required by the current site plan and unallocated parking spaces constructed within the neighborhood commercial center. 4. No site plans shall be approved without sufficient unallocated parking spaces existing within the neighborhood commercial center, until such time as additional parking spaces have been constructed, or unless a parking demand study clearly demonstrates the existence of sufficient unallocated parking spaces. 5. Executed waivers of right to protest creation of special improvement districts (SIDS) for construction and maintenance of a parking garage/facilities shall be filed and of record with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder prior to final plat approval. A copy of the filed documents shall be submitted with the final plat. 5 DRAFT 6. Maximum building height in the B-2 (Community Business District) shall be 49 feet for a roof pitch of less than 3:12 and 57 feet for a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater. 7. A 50' watercourse setback pursuant to Section 18.50.060.D shall be clearly delineated on the final plan, and shall include all adjacent wetlands. Planning Zoning Specific Conditions-Phase IIB: 8. A 35' watercourse setback pursuant to Section 18.50.060.D shall be clearly delineated on the final plan, and shall include all adjacent wetlands. Planning Zoning Specific Conditions-Phase IIC: 9. A 50' watercourse setback pursuant to Section 18.50.060.D shall be clearly delineated on the final plan, and shall include all adjacent wetlands. 10. Applicant shall construct all surface parking spaces (including on-street, Lot 3, Block 17, Lot 8, Block 19 and Lot 3, Block 21) prior to occupancy of any structure. Construction shall include but not be limited to continuous concrete curbs, asphalt, striping, drive approach, landscaping, and irrigation. Parking lot plans in compliance with Bozeman Zoning Ordinance shall be provided with the final plan and subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. 11. Each site plan review shall include an up-to-date calculation, based on a requirement of 1.72 spaces per 1,000 s.f. net floor area, of the existing parking spaces allocated to previous site plans, parking spaces required by the current site plan and unallocated parking spaces constructed within the neighborhood commercial center. 12. No site plans shall be approved without sufficient unallocated parking spaces existing within the neighborhood commercial center, until such time as additional parking spaces have been constructed, or unless a parking demand study clearly demonstrates the existence of sufficient unallocated parking spaces. 13. Executed waivers of right to protest creation of special improvement districts (SIDs) for construction and maintenance of a parking garage/facilities shall be filed and of record with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder prior to final plat approval. A copy of the filed documents shall be submitted with the final plat. 14. Maximum building height in the B-2 (Community Business District) shall be 49 feet for a roof pitch of less than 3:12 and 57 feet for a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater. PlanninlZ Zoning Specific Conditions-All Phases: 6 • DRAFT 15. Development on all lots shall be subject to appropriate site plan review in accordance with Chapter 18.52 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. A letter of approval from the Baxter Meadows Design Review Board shall be provided prior approval of any site plan application. 16. Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the sight triangles, but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office). 17. Prior to final site plan approval, the applicant shall depict on the final site plan the provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to wheelchair ramps, parking spaces, handrails, and curb cuts, signage, including dimensioned construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. The applicant shall submit a common signage plan for Phase 1 property that complies with the Bozeman Sign Ordinance for approval by the Planning Office prior to final site plan approval. 18. Prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site, a Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance; including but not limited to contractor, real estate and lending institution signs temporarily posted on-site during and after construction of the building. A letter of approval from the Baxter Meadows Design Review Board shall be provided prior approval of any Sign Permit Application. 19. Any unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State of Montana. Planning Standard Conditions: 20. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 21. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 22. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, the applicant shall complete all on- site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. 7 A� PLTPLTD 2 1% 167 08/26/2003 5 1111111 IIII 11111111111111111111111111[ 10:19A III III IIIII Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 J a CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR BAXTER MEADOWS PUD, PHASE I This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this z s day of 2003, by and between Baxter Meadows LLP, a Montana Limited Partnership, P.O. Box 10037, Bozeman, MT 59771-10037, hereinafter called the "Subdivider", and the City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Montana, with offices at 411 East Main Street, P. O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, hereinafter called the "City". WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Subdivider to obtain building permits for Baxter Meadows Phase 1 prior to the installation of all required subdivision improvements; and WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose of both the Subdivider and the City to hereby enter into an Agreement, which will guarantee the full and satisfactory completion of the required improvements, related with the property hereinafter described; and it is the intent of this Agreement, and of the parties hereto, to satisfy the improvements guarantee requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property Description This Agreement pertains to, and includes, those properties which are designated and identified as being: A portion of Baxter Meadows Phase 1, located in the. S '/2 of Section 34, T1 S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, consisting of 7 proposed lots numbered 26 through 32s as shown on the Final Plat of Phase 1 of the Baxter Meadows PUD, subject to all existing easements of record or of fact. 2. Improvements The required subdivision improvements are identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003 with the exception of the following: Asphalt paving for the Middle, West and South Alleys, sidewalks, street lights and landscaping. H A96037\001\JAS2255.WPD 2121167 1111111111111111 IN III IN 111111111111111111111111111 08/26/2003 10:18A Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 3. Financial Guarantee. Time for Completion of Improvements It is the Subdivider's intent with this Agreement to obtain building permits prior to completion of all required subdivision improvements. Therefore, this Agreement shall be secured by a financial guarantee in the form of a Bond issued by Flynn Insurance, Bond No. 965001559 dated August 12th, 2002 in the amount of one million, seven hundred ninety nine thousand, five hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents ($1799,514.90), which is more than one hundred and fifty (150) percent of the Estimated Cost of said improvements. The improvements are financially guaranteed through the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003. The Subdivider hereby agrees that the improvements will be completed either prior to the time identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" date March 31, 2003 or prior to requesting occupancy for the proposed structures whichever event occurs first." 4. Inspection Representatives of the City shall have the right to enter.upon the property at any reasonable time in order to inspect it and to determine if the Subdivider is in compliance with this Agreement, and the Subdivider shall permit the City and its representatives to enter upon and inspect the property at any reasonable time. 5. Default Time is of the essence of this Agreement. If the Subdivider shall default in or fail to fully perform any of its obligations in conformance with the time schedule under this Agreement, and such default or failure shall continue for a period of thirty(30) days after written notice specifying the default is deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Subdivider at P.O. Box 81487, Billings, MT 59108-1487 or such other address as the Subdivider shall provide .to the City from time to time, without being completely remedied, satisfied, and discharged,_the City may elect to enforce any.of the following specified remedies: A) The City may, at its option, declare the financial guarantee to be forfeited and secure the complete construction and inspection of the improvements described herein. The City's representative, contractors, and engineers shall have the right H A9603 7T001 VAS2255.WPD 2121167 Page: 3 of 8 08/26/2003 1 0:1 BR Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 to enter upon the property and perform such work and inspection, and the Developer shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. In the event that any funds remain from the financial guarantee upon completion of all improvements, such funds shall be promptly returned to the Subdivider. B) The City may enforce any other remedy provided by law. 6. Indemnification The Developer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Bozeman against any and all claims, at Developer's own expense, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of Developer or its agents, employees, or contractors, whether negligent or otherwise, in connection with the performance of work described in this agreement. The City shall be responsible for any claims arising from negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the City or its agents or employees, except the Developer shall be responsible for those claims of negligence and misconduct arising from the Developer, its agents, or employees not providing to the Municipality, its agents or employees, information relevant to the subject matter of this agreement. The parties shall cooperate in the defense of Claims and shall furnish records, information, and testimony and attend proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary. 7. Attorney Fees In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including City Attorney. 8. Warranty The Subdivider shall warrant against defects of all improvements and that these improvements are made in a good and workman-like manner for a period of one (1) year from the date of their written acceptance by the governing body. 9. Governing Law HA96037\001 VAS2255.WPD till Page: 4 IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII Hill IIIIIIIIOS/28,4003 1 0.,SR Shelley Vance-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 ' This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the Sate of Montana. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, venue is in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, State of Montana. 10. Modification or Alterations No modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall valid, unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties hereto. 11. Invalid Provision The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. 12. No Assignment It is expressly agreed that the Subdivider shall not assign this Agreement in whole, or in part, without prior written consent to City. 13. Successors Except as provided in paragraph twelve (12), this Agreement shall be binding upon, enure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 14. Acknowledgement of Increased Risk The Subdivider acknowledges in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532, Section 1.3.f, recognizes, acknowledges and assumes the increased risk if loss because certain public services may not exist at the site. 15. Occupancy of Structures The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.h and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.11 recognizes and acknowledges that no structures on property identified in this Agreement will be occupied until the required infrastructure improvements identified in Section 2 of this Agreement have been completed or commencement of any used constructed or proposed within the boundary of the PUD or TND will be allowed until required infrastructure improvements have been H A96037\001\JAS2255.WPD 2121167• I IIIPeg 5 of 6 11111111111111111 IN 11111111111111111111111 08/28/200310:18A Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 completed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 16. Incremental Issuance of Building Permits The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City-Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d recognizes and acknowledges that building permits may be issued incrementally, dependent on the status of installation of the infrastructure improvements, for Phase 1 a of the Baxter Meadows PUD. 17. Supplemental Fire Hazard and Liability Insurance The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d will provide fire hazard and liability insurance with the City named as an additional insured. LAND— b ? ER ' IAW- Jerry Williams, General Partner Baxter Meadows Development, LP STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of 2003, before me a Notary Public of the State of Montana, personally appearedre Williams, known to me to be the general partner of Baxter Meadows Development, LP, artnership that executed the foregoing in Improvements Agreement, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. • •fNa 'S otary Public for the State of Montana �`" ,irtxrisn,y �,• - Residing: Q tt ��� •.,� Q '� ace .� •"`: ;C�,'• " Commission Expires: = is - (X H:\96037\001\JAS2255.WPD ?'. 21*167 11IM1,11111,1111111 Page: 8 of 8 II II 1111i 11111111111111,11111111 08/ze/z 003 10.1 SA Shelley Vanoa-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 THE.CITY OF BOZEMAN Debra H. Arkell Director of Public Service STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin L ) On the 9/4 day of ft Gr-� , 2003, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared , known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as Acf;N T b. S'erd c Pof the City of Bozeman, whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that fhe executed the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above. ti h Printed Name M• A pq�''i, Notary Public for the State of Montana �G . .'f?� % Residing: Bozeman,Montana pT A R l q 2= Commission Expires: g—'�0 (Notarial Seal) *� SEAL 0Fl H:\96037\00IVAS2255.WPD l CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR BAXTER MEADOWS PUD, PHASE I This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 0-r-4 p r , 2003, by and between Baxter Meadows LLP, a Montana Limited Partnership, P.O. Box 10037, Bozeman, MT 59771-10037, hereinafter called the "Subdivider", and the City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Montana, with offices at 411 East Main Street, P. O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, hereinafter called the "City". WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Subdivider to obtain building permits for Baxter Meadows Phase 1 prior to the installation of all required subdivision improvements; and WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose of both the Subdivider and the City to hereby enter into an Agreement, which will guarantee the full and satisfactory completion of the required improvements, related with the property hereinafter described; and it is the intent of this Agreement, and of the parties hereto, to satisfy the improvements guarantee requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property Description This Agreement pertains to, and includes, those properties which are designated and identified as being: A portion of Baxter Meadows Phase 1, located in the S 1/2 of Section 34, T1S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, consisting of the following 12 proposed lots as shown on the Final Plat of Phase 1 of the Baxter Meadows PUD, subject to all existing easements of record-or of fact. Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2 ✓ .1 v ✓ Lots 8, 9, 19 and 20 of Block 3 Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11 of Block 5 Lots 2 and 4 of Block 7 2. Improvements The required subdivision improvements are identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003 with the exception H A960371001 UAS2360.WPD 0 of the following: Asphalt paving for the Middle, West and South Alleys, sidewalks, street lights and landscaping. 3. Financial Guarantee, Time for Completion of Improvements It is the Subdivider's intent with this Agreement to obtain building permits prior to completion of all required subdivision improvements. Therefore, this Agreement shall be secured by a financial guarantee in the form of a Bond issued by Flynn Insurance, Bond No. 965001559 dated August 12th, 2002 in the amount of one million, seven hundred ninety nine thousand, five hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents ($I799,514.90), which is more than one hundred and fifty(150) percent of the Estimated Cost of said improvements. The improvements are financially guaranteed through the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003. The Subdivider hereby agrees that the improvements will be completed either prior to the time identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" date March 31, 2003 or prior to requesting occupancy for the proposed structures whichever event occurs first." 4. Inspection Representatives of the City shall have the right to enter upon the property at any reasonable time in order to inspect it and to determine if the Subdivider is in compliance with this Agreement, and the Subdivider shall permit the City and its representatives to enter upon and inspect the property at any reasonable time. 5. Default Time is of the essence of this Agreement. If the Subdivider shall default in or fail to fully perform any of its obligations in conformance with the time schedule under this Agreement, and such default or failure shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice specifying the default is deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Subdivider at P.O. Box 81487, Billings, MT 59108-1487 or such other address as the Subdivider shall provide to the City from time to time, without being completely HA9603 7\00 1 VAS2360.WPD remedied, satisfied, and discharged, the City may elect to enforce any of the following specified remedies: A) The City may, at its option, declare the financial guarantee to be forfeited and secure the complete construction and inspection of the improvements described herein. The City's representative, contractors, and engineers shall have the right to enter upon 'the property and perform such work and inspection, and the Developer shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. In the event that any funds remain from the financial guarantee upon completion of all improvements, such funds shall be promptly returned to the Subdivider. B) The City may enforce any other remedy provided by law. 6. Indemnification The Developer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Bozeman against any and all claims, at Developer's own expense, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of Developer or its agents, employees, or contractors, whether negligent or otherwise, in connection with the performance of work described in this agreement. The City shall be responsible for any claims arising from negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the City or its agents or employees, except the Developer shall be responsible for those claims of negligence and misconduct arising from the Developer, its agents, or employees not providing to the Municipality, its agents or employees, information relevant to the subject matter of this agreement. The parties shall cooperate in the defense of Claims and shall furnish records, information, and testimony and attend proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary. 7. Attorney Fees In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including City Attorney. 8. Warranty H:\96037\OOIUAS2360.WPD The Subdivider shall warrant against defects of all improvements and that these improvements are made in a good and workman-like manner for a period of one (1) year from the date of their written acceptance by the governing body. 9. Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the Sate of Montana. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, venue is in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, State of Montana. 10. Modification or Alterations No modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall valid, unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties hereto. 11. Invalid Provision The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. 12. No Assignment It is expressly agreed that the Subdivider shall not assign this Agreement in whole, or in part, without prior written consent to City. 13. Successors Except as provided in paragraph twelve (12), this Agreement shall be binding upon, enure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 14. Acknowledgement of Increased Risk The Subdivider acknowledges in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532, Section 1.3.f, recognizes, acknowledges and assumes the increased risk if loss because certain public services may not exist at the site. 15. Occupancy of Structures The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.h and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.h recognizes and acknowledges that no structures on property identified in this Agreement will be occupied until the required infrastructure improvements identified in Section 2 of this Agreement have been completed or HA96037\001UAS2360.WPD commencement of any used constructed or proposed within the boundary of the PUD or TND will be allowed until required infrastructure improvements have been completed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 16. Incremental Issuance of Building Permits The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section. 1.3.d recognizes and acknowledges that building permits may be issued incrementally, dependent on the status of installation of the infrastructure improvements, for Phase 1 a of the Baxter Meadows PUD. 17. Supplemental Fire Hazard and Liability Insurance The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d.and Bozeman City Ordinance No..1532 Section 1.3.d will provide fire hazard and liability insurance with the City named as an additional insured. L OWNER Je i iams, General Partner B Meadows Development, LP STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gt ) On this N day of OC' � {�` , 2003, before me a Notary Public of the State of Montana, personally appeared Jerry Williams, known to me to be the general partner of Baxter Meadows Development, LP, the partnership that executed the foregoing in Improvements Agreement, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntq set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. -411611'24h 14S r�Q s Printed Name (Notarial Seal) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing: Bozeman, Montana Commission Expires: ,IeN55 H A96037 001 V AS2360.W PD THE CITY OF BOZEMAN Debra H. Arkell Director of Public Service STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On the day of �tJ , 2003, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared , known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as of the City of Bozeman, whose name is subscribed to the within i strument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above. Printed Name Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing: Bozeman, Montana Commission Expires: , oZOa(p (Notarial Seal) if 0 HA96037\00IUAS2360.W PD ANEW Building Division ---- -- CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DIVISION'._ BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS fU�` RESIDENTIAL X COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE I VALUATIONS (G I SITE ADDRESS: � !30 „ Bosal St. NEAREST CROSS STREET al atin Green Blvd. 'PROJECT OR BUS11 ESS rrAME: Baxter Meadows EMAILkthorson x atermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S i SW SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP-IS LOT 8 BLOCK 3 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING 'S APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP pHONE 406-582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE — ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): MCITY WATER/SEWER'SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC ❑OTHER No building or other structure shall be erected,moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted wi out a signature.Incorrect information provides in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the delay or revoc�ion of bu di /cr occupancy permits. SIGNED- DATE OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BELOW THIS LIN CITY PLANNING DEPARMENT ; PROVED' ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ( }APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED i WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED { }DISAPPROVED O COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT ()APPROVED ( j DISAPPROVED O COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED ( }DISAPPROVED X ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED (}DISAPPROVED O STREET I SANITATION ( )APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE ( j APPROVED (.j DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( )APPROVED ( )DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what is required to re the deficiency lies)? DEPARMENTAL SIGNATU i/ 1 DATE 1� O IMPACT FEE COORDINATOR ()APPROVED () DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE of Bourj�� v C. Building:, Divisi?'n CITY OEIQZEM�-N.BUILDING DIVISION A.P. BIJILDING� 'WM7_ G TIO FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT _.PROPOSALS RESIDENTIAL X CO 2CIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE VALUATION S /L/O /a4_ SITE ADDRESS: Barer Lane NEWST CROSS STREE�7aAa 41n Green Blvd. PROJECT OR BUSINESS NAME: Baxter Meadows EMAILkthorson@baxtermeddows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: s i s-wT 'SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP IS LOT 20* BLOCK - 3 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING .4,PPLICAiNT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP —PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) NIA PLUMBER'S NAME PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT (if applicable)- ECITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC OOTHER No building or other structure shall be erected.moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate a'uthoritics prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a signature. Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the delay or r oc )on of building Ad/pp occupancy permits. SIGNED -elf DATE 6d 0 ,3 IFOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY'BELOW THIS LINEJ N�EITY PLANNING DEPARMENT &4,ifPROVED ()DISAPPROVED-•GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ()APPROVED DISAPPROVED 0 BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ( ).A-PPROVED DISAPPROVED • RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT APPROVED DISAPPROVED 6 COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH D' EPARMENT APPROVED DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY FOOD SERVICE ( )APPROVED O DISAPPROVED ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED DISAPPROVED 0 STREET/SANITATION ( )APPROVED DISAPPROVED 0 GALLATINT COUNTY ROAD OFFICE APPROVED DISAPPROVED 0 MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVED DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what is required to remedy the deficiency(ies)? EPARKENTAL SIGNATU 711 DATE \6PACT FEE COORDINATOR ')APPROVED O DISAPPROVED 30RIZED SIGNATURE DATE eo r I it Building Division L h,? CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DI ISIN BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW F DEVELOPMENT'!' PROPOSALS RESIDENTIAL X COM IAL_SQUARE FOOTAGE (�S d VALUATIONS 2Ci �Z2' �\,►� I t SITE ADDRESS: Bosal St. NEAREST CROSS STREET Gallatin Green-Blvd. PROTECT OR BUSINESS NAME: Baxter Meadows EMAILkth'orson axtermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S}SW SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP 1 S LOT 9 BLOCK 3 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAMEiADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development,. LP PHONE 406-582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) N/A PLUMBER'S NAME PHONE „. ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT (if applicable): ECITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC OOTHER _ No building or other structure shall be erected.moved,added to or structurally altered witho-it valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted wirimt a signature.,lncorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the de ay or r ocation of buildin /or occupancy permits. SIGNED DATE l OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BLOW THIS LINEI TY PLANNING DEPARMENT �Xp PROVED ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE O APPROVED ( }DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ( ) DISAPPROVED p RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ( )DISAPPROVED .CNWATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED (.)DISAPPROVED O COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT ()APPROVED ( j DISAPPROVED O COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED g"GINEERING DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O STREET!SANITATION ( )APPROVED ('j DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE (' )APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what is required to remedy the deficiency DEPARMENTAL SIGNAT RE DATE lt:�: O IMPACT FEE COORDINATOR O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE F. C' 0 1 LTV A�- (00 Building DivisionJLL-1" CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DIVI>SIO.N.: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT --- PROPOSALS RESIDENTIAL X COMMERCIAL_SQUARE FOOTAGE O'' VALUATION S I.26�00 Ale SITE A : ��DDRESSqQ_S Baxter Lane NEAREST CROSS STREET Gallatin Green Blvd. PROJECT OR BUSINESS NAME: Baxter Meadows EMAILkthorsonLdbaxtermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . SiSWT SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP 1S LOT 19 BLOCK 3 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNED P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRA lows Development, LP PHONE 406-582-7523. (BUSII,�SS LICENSE PLUMBER'S NAME_ PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NA PHONE MECHANICAL CON' J N/A , PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTiuiN INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): ECITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC OOTHER No building or other structure shall be erected.moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.00 of the Bozeman Municipal Code: This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted wit out a signature. Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the del v or rev cati n ofbuildin or occupancy permits. SIGNED DATE OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY B O W THIS LINE CITY PLANNING DEPARMENT PROVED ()DISAPPROVED 0 GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED 0 RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT {) APPROVED ( j DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED ( j DISAPPROVED 6)(ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISA.PPROVED STREET/SANITATION ( )APPROVED ( j DISAPPROVED 0 GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE O APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED 0 iv10NTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what is required to re e deficiency(ies)? DEPARMENTAL SIGNATURE % DATE 0 IMP ACT FEE COORDINAT R (j APPROVED (j DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ' DATE ��(mow` - ��5 y� �.-Str�� �S ��. � � ��� � �:� 212A67 I 08/2 1 0f8/2003 1 IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIlilIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiI IIIIIIII 08/20:18A Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR BAXTER MEADOWS PUD, PHASE I This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this — s�day of u y u sf 2003, by and between Baxter Meadows LLP, a Montana Limited Partnership, P.O. Box 10037, Bozeman, MT 59771-10037, hereinafter called the "Subdivider", and the City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Montana, with offices at 411 East Main Street, P. O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, hereinafter called the "City". WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Subdivider to obtain building permits for Baxter Meadows Phase 1 prior to the installation of all required subdivision improvements; and WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose of both the Subdivider and the City to hereby enter into an Agreement, which will guarantee the full and satisfactory completion of the required improvements, related with the property hereinafter described; and it is the intent of this Agreement, and of the parties hereto, to satisfy the improvements guarantee requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property Description This Agreement pertains to, and includes, those properties which are designated and identified as being: A portion of Baxter Meadows Phase 1, located in the S '/z of Section 34, T1S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, consisting of 7 proposed lots numbered 26 through 32s as shown on the Final Plat of Phase 1 of the Baxter Meadows PUD, subject to all existing easements of record or of fact. 2. Improvements The required subdivision improvements are identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003 with the exception of the following. Asphalt paving for the Middle, West and South Alleys, sidewalks, street lights and landscaping. H:\96037\001 VAS2255.WPD I IIIIII IlIII IIIII IIIIIII IIII IIIII IIIIII III IIIII IIII IIII 21 82 1 1867A Shelley Vanoe-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 3. Financial Guarantee Time for Completion of Improvements It is the Subdivider's intent with this Agreement to obtain building permits prior to completion of all required subdivision improvements. Therefore, this Agreement shall be secured by a financial guarantee in the form of a Bond issued by Flynn Insurance, Bond No. 965001559 dated August 12th, 2002 in the amount of one million, seven hundred ninety nine thousand, five hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents ($1799,514.90), which is more than one hundred and fifty (150) percent of the Estimated Cost of said improvements. The improvements are financially guaranteed through the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003. The Subdivider hereby agrees that the improvements will be completed either prior to the time identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" date March 31, 2003 or prior to requesting occupancy for the proposed structures whichever event occurs first." 4. Inspection Representatives of the City shall have the right to enter upon the property at any reasonable time in order to inspect it and to determine if the Subdivider is in compliance with this Agreement, and the Subdivider shall permit the City and its representatives to enter upon and inspect the property at any reasonable time. 5. Default Time is of the essence of this Agreement. If the Subdivider shall default in or fail to fully perform any of its obligations in conformance with the time schedule under this Agreement, and such default or failure shall continue for a period of thirty(30) days after written notice specifying the default is deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Subdivider at P.O. Box 81487, Billings, MT 59108-1487 or such other address as the Subdivider shall provide to the City from time to time, without being completely remedied, satisfied, and discharged, the City may elect to enforce any of the following specified remedies: A) The City may, at its option, declare the financial guarantee to be forfeited and secure the complete construction and inspection of the improvements described herein. The City's representative, contractors, and engineers shall have the right F1 A96037\001\J AS2255.W PD IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIIII IIII IIIII(IIIII III IIIII IIII IIII Page: 3 of 186`l Q Shelley Vanoo-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 to enter upon the property and perform such work and inspection, and the Developer shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. In the event that any funds remain from the financial guarantee upon completion of all improvements, such funds shall be promptly returned to the Subdivider. B) The City may enforce any other remedy.provided by law. 6. Indemnification The Developer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Bozeman against any and all claims, at Developer's own expense, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of Developer or its agents, employees, or contractors, whether negligent or otherwise, in connection with the performance of work described in this agreement. The City shall be responsible for any claims arising from negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the City or its agents or employees, except the Developer shall be responsible for those claims of negligence and misconduct arising from the Developer, its agents, or employees not providing to the Municipality, its agents or employees, information relevant to the subject matter of this agreement. The parties shall cooperate in the defense of Claims and shall furnish records, information, and testimony and attend proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary. 7. Attorney Fees In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including City Attorney. 8. Warranty The Subdivider shall warrant against defects of all improvements and that these improvements are made in a good and workman-like manner for a period of one (1) year from the date of their written acceptance by the governing body. 9. Governing Law HA96037T00I V AS2255.W PD 21214167 IIIIII III)IIIIIII IIII IIIII IIIIII I III 2 4 8 08//II II IIII IIII 28/2003 10.18A Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the Sate of Montana. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, venue is in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, State of Montana. 10. Modification or Alterations No modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall valid, unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties hereto. 11. Invalid Provision The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. 12. No Assignment It is expressly agreed that the Subdivider shall not assign this Agreement in whole, or in part, without prior written consent to City. 13. Successors Except as provided in paragraph twelve (12), this Agreement shall be binding upon, enure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 14. Acknowledgement of Increased Risk The Subdivider acknowledges in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532, Section 1 .3.f, recognizes, acknowledges and assumes the increased risk if loss because certain public services may not exist at the site. 15. Occupancy of Structures The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.h and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.h recognizes and acknowledges that no structures on property identified in this Agreement will be occupied until the required infrastructure improvements identified in Section 2 of this Agreement have been completed or commencement of any used constructed or proposed within the boundary of the PUD or TND will be allowed until required infrastructure improvements have been FIA96037\00 wns22ss.wPn .Y 121167 IIIII illll IIIII IIIIIII III IIIII IIIIII III IIIII IIII Ili 08�28/26 of 003 80:18R Shelley Vanoo-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 completed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 16. Incremental Issuance of Building Permits The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d recognizes and acknowledges that building permits may be issued incrementally, dependent on the status of installation of the infrastructure improvements, for Phase 1 a of the Baxter Meadows PUD. 17. Supplemental Fire Hazard and Liability Insurance The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d will provide fire hazard and liability insurance with the City named as an additional insured. LAND NER Jerry Williams, General Partner Baxter Meadows Development, LP STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this� day of- , 2003, before me a Notary Public of the State of Montana, personally appeared J Williams, known to me to be the general partner of Baxter Meadows Development, LP, t e partnership that executed the foregoing in Improvements Agreement, and acknowledged to me that he executed-the same for 'and on behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. 11 otary Public for the State of Montana Residing: ,P Cz < ' Commission Expires: JOd L H:\96037\00 I V AS2255.W PD 2121167 IIIIIII II� Page: B of 6 IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIII�f III I IIIIIIIIIIiII 08/26/20 3 0 10.18R Shelley Vanoe-Gallat.in Co MT MISC 36.00 THE CITY OF BOZEMAN aG�-fNS Debra H. Arkell Director of Public Service STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin L ) On the a l•9�1 day of �L d L)r , 2003, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared 'P . 1 x S 11 , known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as 9c f%ti'��t�'drr df�+b. SE?((l iC POf the City of Bozeman, whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that the executed the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above. -V,w—, n_ ,� Printed Name M. Apg2,� Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing: Bozeman, Montana C-�A R/A j•2 `7 Commission Expires: —�O-d.y0 6 (Notarial Seal) SEAL.'�� '% may• ' . . • •�Q'��•. OF �AO H:\96037\00I V AS2255.WPD .J 0 �-- n , of Boz Building Division - -----e ' "", TYet CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERIVIIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS RESIDENTI.ALX COMMERCIAL—SQUARE FOOTAGE VALUATION S SITE ADDRESS: NEAREST CROSS STREET Equestrian Lane PROJECTOR BUSINESS NAIME: Baxta Meadows EMAIL::kthorson@baxtermead 'ows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S j SWj SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TOWNSHIP 1 S LOT 26 BLOCK 22 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP. PHONE 40.6-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-49.10 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SFD c.2 C A'I/rl' tf INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): ®CITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES DWELL/SEPTIC ❑OTHER No building or other structure shall be erected,moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18-62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a signature. Incorrect information provided in conjuncrion with this APPLICATION may result in the delay or r v o cation of building a d/or occupancy permits. SIGNED U( � DATE �+ Z ZO 03 OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BELOW THIS LhVt CITY'I"�`^. i�FIVING"DEPA12:kM4T" PROVED ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED 0 RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED (�hVATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED () DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEP ARMENT ()APPROVED { )DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED Z�ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED () DISAPPROVED O STREET,/SANITATION ()APPROVED () DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( )APPROVED (' ) DISAPPROVED If disapproved, what.is required to remedy the deficiency(ies)? DEPARTMNTAL SIGNATU DATE 0 IMPACT FEE COORDINATOR ( ) APPROVED O DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE' ! `•,Ciry of Boum . , 44- Building Division F PbA!l lli�IG - =OF-BOZE"GI IAIN BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS RESIDENTIAL X COM MRCIAL_SQUARE FOOTAGE VALUATION S SITE ADDRESS: S&st NEAREST CROSS STREET Equestrian Lane PROTECT OR BUSINESS NAME: Baxter doves EMAIL kthorson@baxtermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S J SW SECTION 3 W 4 RANGE 5E TONSHIP_1 S LOT 27 BLOCK 22 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING APPLICAINT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PRONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487 PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOWS.NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SFD y� S YM/123� INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER!WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable): MCITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES GWELL/SEPTIC OOTHER No building or other structure shall be erected.moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of secrion 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a signature. Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may result in the delay c,TITfbn ouilding /or occupancy permits. n SIGNED - DATE 2 LoO�3 OR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BELOW THIS LINEI OO1ALLA I'Y=REAi4RI 6'rI)E t�RMEN'T, ROVED ()DISAPPROVED 1.IN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ()APPROVED () DISAPPROVED O BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED O RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED ( )DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARMENT (j APPROVED { )DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED ?SNGINEERING DEPARTMENT ()APPROVED ()DISAPPROVED TREET!SANITATION . ()APPROVED O DISAPPROVED 0 GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED 0 MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( )APPROVED (' )DISAPPROVED If disapproved. what is required tQren7e4,v the deficiency Nes)? DEPARMENTAL SIGMA DATE 0 IMPACT FEE COORDINATOR O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE I,1LEIb (L�=' d ''1 AUG Building Di PEPA13TG."iEidT OF PL.411 I, g vision i Alk.T Gu!;`PliliflTY DD!tEi_,P1J CITY OF BOZEMAN BUILDING DIVISION BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS RESIDENTIALX COMMERCIAL SQUAYE FOOTAGE VALUATION SITE ADDRESS: , a&t 41 1 :�f3g1j OSLh 1 NEAREST CROSS STREET Middle Alley PROJECTOR BUSINESS NAME: Baxter Meadows EMAIL, kthorson@baxtermeadows.com LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S§SW� SECTION 34 RANGE 5E TO WNSEUP IS LOT 30 BLOCK 22 SUBDIVISION Baxter Meadows ZONING .APPLICANT'S NAME Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 406-896-4910 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME/ADDRESS P.O. Box 81487. PHONE 406-896-4910 CITY Billings STATE MT ZIP CODE 59108-1487 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Baxter Meadows Development, LP PHONE 582-7523 (BUSINESS LICENSE NAME) PLUMBER'S NAME N/A PHONE ELECTRICIAN'S NAME N/A PHONE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S NAME N/A PHONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SFD .2e prex "'rj'e INDICATE TYPE OF SEWER/WATER SERVICE PROPOSED FOR SUBJECT PROJECT(if applicable': (RCITY WATER/SEWER SERVICES ❑WELL/SEPTIC ❑OTHER No building or other structure shall be erected,moved,added to or structurally altered without valid permits. This APPLICATION form is to be completed for all development proposals which need building permits,pursuant of section 18.62.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This APPLICATION form must be completed and approved by the appropriate authorities prior to building permit issuance. All blanks must be completed. Applications will not be accepted without a signature. Incorrect information provided in conjunction with this APPLICATION may. result in the delay or r vocation of buildin d/or occupancy permits. . SIGNED DATE GV Z0( FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY BELOW THIS L I:TYLPLAI�ININCrDERAR3vFENTo VED ()DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE O APPROVED. O DISAPPROVED 0 BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT O APPROVED (.)DISAPPROVED WATER/SEWER DEPARTMENT ( )APPROVED O DISAPPROVED 0 COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEP.ARMENT O APPROVED. { ) DISAPPROVED O COUNTY FOOD SERVICE O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O-ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. O APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O STREET./SANITATION ( )APPROVED . ( ) DISAPPROVED O GALLATIN COUNTY ROAD OFFICE ( )APPROVED O DISAPPROVED O MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( )APPROVED ( ) DISAPPROVED If disapproved, what.is required tvfe_m__ea.%,the deficiency(ies)? DEPARMENTAL SIGNAT RE DATE 0 hMPACT FEE COORDINATOR (j APPROVED O DISAPPROVED AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE DATE Y • An' 1 JbJJ�� :r. For safe, reliable *" light consider the Decashield® 400 s series from GE Lighting Systems. This attractive design enhances the appearance of its surroundings, day or night. From parking lots to commercial {; complexes you can rely on GE to provide clear lighting that reduces glare and provides a comfortable setting. • i J �JsJfJJ J��J�' �JJ !JfJJJIJsJJ� Applications • GE designed and built ballast provides The GE Decashield 400 Luminaire is designed for walkways, Proven long life and reliable operation. driveways, tennis courts, malls, shopping centers, commercial • Plug In Ignitor makes servicing easy. and industrial complexes, residential areas and parkway • Removable Ballast Tray option for easy lighting. maintenance. FeatzereS Hot Restrike Option (Non-UL) available. • UL1572 Listed SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS, and . Enclosed and gasketed optical provides CUL Listed to meet Canadian electrical requirements. superior optical performance with • Standard construction is IP54. maintained light output levels and low • Die-cast aluminum housing and hinged door combines maintenance. classic contemporary styling with rugged, lightweight durability. • Direct mounting arm for flat or curved • Available in 188 different colors, the smooth polyester surface. powder paint finish provides both corrosion resistance and an . GE patented ALGLAS® finish on aesthetic appearance. For available colors other than our reflectors means superior optical standard dark bronze, black, charcoal gray, aluminum and performance. white, please contact your GE Lighting Systems sales • Numerous application requirements representative. are met by multiple distribution choices • Stainless steel latch design and removable one including: piece door assembly provides no-tool Type II, Type III, Type V and Forward access to both ballast and optical Throw. compartments for quick and • The field rotatable Type II, Type III easy maintenance. metal halide and all Forward Throw reflectors provide lighting design flexibility. • Alternate 4-inch, 8-inch and 12-inch is"'� '" •:'ts>z mounting arms available. e Luminaire shipped in one carton, under one ordering number (including Mounting Arm) for easy order entry, tracking and receiving. • The GE Five-Year Fixture Failure Warranty assures the highest quality and trouble-free maintenance. DSMT 40 S 0 A 1 G M C 3 DB C _ Light IES Distribution Product ID. Wattage Source Voltage Ballast Type PE Function Lens Type Type Color Options XXXX XX X X . X X X . XXX XX XXX DSMT= 07=70 S=HPS 60Hz See Ballast and 1=None G =Glass See Ballast and AL=Aluminum A=Lightning Arrester, Decashield 10=100 M=MH 0 =120/208/ Photometric 2=PE Receptacle Photometric BL=Black Grounding Type 400 Luminaire NOTE: Standard: 240/277 Selection Table 4=PE Receptacle Selection Table DB=Dark C=Charcoal Filter with Ballast HPS only Mogul Multivolt A=Autoreg and Shorting MC2=Medium Bronze (Not available with Tray 15=150(55V) base lamp 1 =120 B=BiLevel Cap Cutoff (Standard) FWT) Flat Surface & not Type 11 F=Fusin Not Mounting Arm 17=175 2 =208 G =Mag-Reg with NOTE:Receptacles CG =Charcoal 9 DSME= 24=250/400 included. 3 =240 Grounded Socket connected same MC3=Medium Gray available with Shell voltage as unit Cutoff multivolt or Decashield NOTE: 4 =277 WH=White 400 Luminaire 250/400 H =HPF Reactor or Type III 120X347V) 5 =480 FWT=Forward NOTE:Contact with connected Lag factory for other J=Line Surge External for 250W D=347 K=Hot Restrike Throw colors Protector, Expulsion Slipfitter, for 25=250 F =120X347 (Must also order•P• HTV=Horizontal Type 2.375 in. OD 40=400 T =220 option at tight (Nom1,11.1 Type V P=Prewire with 6' of pipe mounted. Contact Factory) 14/3 cable. 50Hz DSMR = — M= Mag-Reg R=No Mounting Arm Decashield Y=240 P=CWI with Dec Dec Luminaire NOTE:120X347 Grounded Socket 400 connected for Shell with Ballast 120V -- Tray& Curved Mounting Arm The catalog numbers.options and modifications on cO ©LISTED this page are UL Listed unless otherwise noted. J �,sJ fJJ�JrJ� �JJ !I-WJD-JIf-J Dimensions Drilling Templates 1 DSMT DSMT --r—r--� SQUARE POLE MOUNTING: 2.375 in.(60mm)}---; STANDARD HOLE 6.500:in,. [ 9.000 in. �_ 435in.(11mm)DIA 229mm s.z50 n. HOLES (165m ) (1 WH) 11(.0121n. 2.19E In.(W—) �l ��_23. n 8.000 in. 250 i q� (1 2, ) r(203mm) (591mm 13) ( —iwv (11zmm) HOLE - 24.000in.(61Omm) 655 in.(1)mm) -+{ I112 n.(33mm) 2.250 (57mm) DSMR 17.000in. ROUND POLE MOUNTING (432mm) 3.5 to 4.5-inch(89 to 114mm)OD round pole TI 1351n.1t1mm)DIA HOLES 5.250 in. 033mm) -TT- z.n9 In.19ammf DSME --------1 ) 5AM in. (for 2.375 in. Pipe) , '9 4 nm Dw —2wIn.CU i, / 4.000 in. HOLE / I (102mm) / I 71J�:i:.....� I ` I Ballast and Photometric Selection Table All light sources are clear unless otherwise incicated. + Photometric Curve Ballast Type/Voltage Number 35-17xxxx 6OHz 50Hz IES Distribution Type Light Multi- 208,240, 347, Wattage Source volt 120 277,480 120X347 220 240 MC2 MC3 FWT HTV 70, 100 150 (55V) HPS H G,H,M G,M H N/A N/A 8591 8596 8604 8599 250, 400 HPS A A, P A, P A, P _A,H A 8592 7315 8605_ 8600 175, 250 MH A A A A A N/A 8594 8597 8607 8602 400 MH A A, P A, P A, P A A 8595 8598 8608 8603 NOTE:N/A=Not available C ti r 1r�s Data 1 Approximate Net Weight—35-45 Ibs (16-18 kgs) r Suggested Mounting Height—20-40 ft(6-12 M) 4 Effective Projected Area: With Mounting Arm — 1.8 sq ft(0.17 sq M) Without Mounting Arm — 1.4 sq ft(0.13 sq M) References See GE Lighting Systems Product Catalog for Explanation of Options and - Other Terms Used, and Pole Selection. See Catalog supplements for Photometric Curves and Guide Form Specifications. +rYiY I J � J 'J J ';��• I J� J / J' f � ] Jtli yr.lirJ. P� rl erJ I19D IAl External Light Shield Photoelectric Control • ELS-DS — Cannot use with LVS, • PECOTL — 120, 208, 240, 277, Multivolt— �. Polycarbonate vandal shield Turn and Lock " • PECOTL— 120 volt—Turn and Lock • PEC5TL—480 volt—Turn and Lock . Ex ernaf Slip i .r �x Select "R" option when choosing ordering number Pole Top Tenon Adapter, Round , for luminaire. • PTTA-R-SGL— Dark Bronze—Single luminaire • ESFBL-DS001 — Black for 2-inch (51mm) pipe . pTTA-R-090— Dark Bronze—Double at 900 r • ESFBL-OS002— Black for 1.66-inch (42mm) pipe • PTTA-R-D180— Dark Bronze—Double at 180° • ESFDB-OS001 — Dark Bronze for 2-inch (51mm) . PTTA-R-T90— Dark Bronze—Triple at 90° (2.375-inch(60mm] maximum OD) pipe . pnA-R-T120— Dark Bronze—Triple at 120° * ` • ESFDB-OS002 — Dark Bronze for 1 1/4-inch ' F . • ad at 90°—Q n k B D Q90 R- — Dark Bronze—Quad(32mm) (1.66-inch (42mm] maximum OD) pipe PTTA- NOTE:Must order round pole adapter separately(RPAOB-OS or RPABL-OS(. '� r< Internal Slimsfitter Arm Adapter Pole Top Tenon Adapter, Square A Substitute color of luminaire for ** in Ordering • PTTA-S-SGL— Dark Bronze—Single luminaire Number. • PTTA-S-D90— Dark Bronze—Double at 90° • ISAA**-DS • PTTA-S-D180— Dark Bronze—Double at 180° r • PTTA-S-T90— Dark Bronze—Triple at 90° • PTTA-S-Q90— Dark Bronze—Quad at 90° Knuckle Flat Surface.Ada�nter NOTE:Utilizes standard Decashield•400luminaire mounting arms with diagonal hole pattern` Select "R" option when choosing orderingy ' number for luminaire. Polycarbonate Vandal Shied • KFSABL-DS — Black • LVS-DS—400 watt maximum • KFSADB-DS— Dark Bronze Round Pole Adapter for DSMT ±>h Y Knuckle Pole To Adter a Substitute color of luminaire for ** in Ordering —P. .� Number. Select "R" option when choosing ordering • RPA**-DS—For 3.5 to 4.5-inch (89 to 114mm) number for luminaire. OD poles .. • KPTABL-DS— Black • KPTADB-OS — Dark Bronze Shorting Caa • SCCL-PECTL Line Surrae Protector Expulsion Type s: • 35 411749R01 Can be added to Wall Mounting Plate many fixture terminal boards. See •WMPBL-OS — Black ' Technical Section. •WMPOB-DS— Dark Bronze y � fJ J '1 riJ IIJ�, JJJ , S Registered Trademark of General Electric Company _' _J JJJ�JJJJ J_Y=J 1� `M Trademark of General Electric Company Oars subject to change without notice Hendersonville, NC 28793-4506 LSP-1089E—8/01(3M)GELS www.oeliohtinosystems.com eadows Development,LP LETT `O TMUSOM OT-T-i`nn � 1060 o rpar_ l. 9719 LL C L U Tel'j4067523 DATE JOB NO. �^ I._1 aa.(4 5 5 9616 6� Gam(/ ATTENTION }'nrodoy,Today&Tomnrrov. S E P 1 M 33 RE: �j t�ronr�TngENT Of PLANNING TO �c"li J v \ r1PMF C �ym WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑Attached ❑Under Separate cover via the following items: ❑Shop drawings ❑Prints ❑Plans ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Copy of letter ❑Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION nl IMVIn �l'C. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval ❑For your use O Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution ❑As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints ❑For review and comment ❑ ❑FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS (A(AAM yvaqclk COPY TO SIGNED: It enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. CITY OF BOZEMAN VBo2�,`�1 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9x * * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street t� 8- ,fie Fax: (406.)582-2263 CO °? Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net Baxter Meadows contact list: Jerry Williams: cell phone—406-698-4549 Claudia Metzler: phone — 585-1209; fax - 585-9616; cell — 581-1211; email - cmetzler@baxterrealty.com Terry Metzler: cell— 570-8740 Jeff Kanning: 406-248-3443 Teresa Olson: cell - 580-7561; home— 585-7848 - landscape Allied Engineering: 582-0221 Mom son—M_ aierle: 587-0721 Mel Kotur: 582-4637 planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination q�BOz. ',� CITY OF BOZEMAN V9x Bozeman, Montana �►co.ti February 18, 2003 Russ McElyea The Law Firm P. O. Box 1288 Bozeman,MT 59771-1288 RE: Baxter Meadows Phase 1 My File#351 Dear Russ: This is to follow up on the various topics we discussed during our February 14, 2003 meeting. 1. Baxter Lane Street Cut Permit. Your client wishes to install a 36" conduit/culvert under Baxter Lane for media wire. Preliminary Plat approval condition#18 requires the portion of Baxter Lane adjacent to Phase 1 to be fully improved. This condition has not yet been met, and will be financially guaranteed prior to approval of the final plat. As we discussed,I contacted Lee Provance, County Road Superintendent, today, as the County maintains this section of Baxter Road through an inter-local agreement. His concern with cutting the street at this time of year is that the patch may not set and/or hold, which could cause further damage of the street. There is also a safety concern for snow plow drivers, as the plow could catch the edge of the patch and cause damage to the equipment or driver. Because this section of Baxter Lane has been totally annexed to the City, and because the improvements required in condition 18 have not been completed, I will revise our inter-local agreement and revise the maintenance route so Baxter Lane, from North Wh west to Flanders Mill Road, or the edge of pavement, whichever first occurs, will be maintained (including snow plowing)by the City Street Division. As such, your client must apply for, and receive, a Street Cut Permit from the City Engineering Department BEFORE any street cut is made. Special conditions on patching will likely be required. A copy of the Permit is enclosed for your convenience. This revision offers absolutely no guarantee that a Street Cut Permit will be granted. It will be reviewed on it's own merits, and the City of Bozeman reserves the right to deny the permit and require that the conduit/culvert be placed via boring. Street address:411 E.Main St. Phone:(406)582-2300 Mailing address:P.O.Box 1230 Fax:(406)582-2344 Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 TDD:(406)582-2301. Russ McElyea February 18, 2003 Page 2 2. Street Lights. Preliminary Plat approval condition#45 requires the major street intersections on Baxter Lane to be illuminated with street lights. The City Commission has "pre-approved"Northwestern Energy street light standards. These lights must be installed or financially guaranteed prior to final plat approval. If the lights are to be installed through a Street Lighting Improvements District (SILD), and your client does not want to financially guarantee them, the following must occur prior to final plat approval: 1)the City Commission must approve the Resolution of Intent to Create the district; 2) a Waiver of Right to Protest Creation of SILD must be filed on the property; and 3) a "Notice to Purchaser" must be signed by all parties who have already entered into any type of buy-sell agreement with the developer, with a copy of the signed Notices provided with the final plat application. As we discussed, if the Planned Unit Development application indicated street lights would be installed on the internal subdivision streets, the above also applies to them. A copy of the steps necessary to create a SILD, as well as a sample Waiver and Notice, are included for your convenience. 3. Water Rights. Preliminary Plat approval condition#61 requires usable water rights, or cash in-lieu thereof, for Phase 1 to be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. You indicated an interest in decreeing 50 acre feet of water rights from Middle Creek to the City, with the balance due paid as cash in-lieu. Cindy Younkin of your firm represents the City in water rights issues and questions. While she is at the Legislature, Barry O'Connell is handling these issues for her. You agreed to coordinate with Barry(for Cindy)review of the Middle Creek water rights your client is interested in transferring to the City, as we must be assured in writing by Barry or Cindy that the water rights are usable for City of Bozeman water treatment purposes. 4. Baxter Lane Improvements. You advised me that you plan to have a video made of the existing condition of Baxter Lane prior to making any improvements to establish a baseline of the road condition. I agreed that this was a good idea, and suggested that you have our contract engineer, James Nickelson,Morrison-Maierle Engineers, present during that process. 5. Davis Lane/Farmers Canal issues. We briefly reviewed the concern with the impact improvements to Davis Lane will have on the adjacent farmer's canal/ irrigation ditch system. While these improvements do not impact Phase 1 of Baxter Meadows Subdivision, your client has provided the City with a financial guarantee of the improvements (through an agreement made with the Russ McElyea February 18, 2003 Page 3 developers of Cattail Subdivision). No work on Davis Lane that will impact the canal/irrigation system will be permitted during irrigation season,which is typically April 20 through September 30. If you have questions regarding this summary, please call me at 582-2306. Sincerely, Debra H. Arkell Director of Public Services DA/dla Enc. Cc: Richard Hixson, City Engineer Bob Murray, Staff Engineer James Nickelson, Consulting Engineer Andy Kerr,Engineering Assistant Lee Provance, Gallatin County Road Superintendent John VanDelinder, Street Superintendent --Dave Skelton, Senior Planner . ... . . • COLLABORATIVE D DESIGN DARCHITECTS= TRANSMITTAL AUG 2 2 2003 i ARCHITECTS PLANNERS LETTER 2280 GRANT ROAD•SUITE C • BILLINGS, MONTANA 59102 DEPA?,TMENT OF PLANNING PO BOX 80467•BILLINGS, MONTANA 59108-0467 ANn Cr;,:V.UP!ITY OEVELOPIviENT (406)248-3443 _.._ FAX: (406)248-3765 PROJECT: f S ARCHITECTS Q (name,address) f->�j- 0 PROJECT NO: ��0 � 1 DATE: e %� /> p Q TO: If enclosures are not as noted,please C/ ✓ T��i inform us immediately. If checked below,please: ❑ Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. ❑ Return enclosures to us. ATTN: WE TRANSMIT: herewith ❑ under separate cover via in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: ❑ approval ❑ distribution to parties ❑ information ❑ review&comment ❑ record use THE FOL OWING: Drawings ❑ Shop Drawing Prints ❑ Samples Specifications ❑ Shop Drawing Reproducibles ❑ Product Literature ❑ Change Order ❑ COPIES DATE REV.NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE I 7• E,�cA r I fSl xl I e�> A •.� s I -2 7.03 vlvl r I �S.S• 03 I b (&-. o 3 a5��- ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS: COLLABORATIVE DESIGN ARCHITECTS= COPIES TO: (with enclosures) ❑ LBY: ONE PAGE w_ �='s:auk.•w__:ri���>_rac��_.���'•,:=i•���s=�i���ar_c,�.-�•�e�c.r.• // /�.r�1 VIA Al ro e e r e e . - I��I =- � Ivll��11111�1► !.ZI ,�'�'i���� fit.I.WM I►V411� .r ///%iTi� :::il +11C��Y17WIt�:!,►�..... C�:�Lwrl �•% � ism///%i��� �� Iro1� i�:�fl]1 ml:r'sSY�`�'�E:�'� �7f�•� � L __ '.•nn�.os:.v,..�i�i�;r.ci�►�s�rL.��e�..��c-sa��a.���.•..—_���.���'r,.� //,'y<.••�, I� Ron \,`■ .r..n—.n.�c�rrs�rar_ .r.+����.�c-a�.raa�..�_�a���•��.ta.w.rca �r�WN a r•�XA'�! �i* !�?il Ica � I A�3a ��\��C-w� t�_ ����ieeeee■�������eeee�r ������. - __ —- - • - O O O POLE LOCATIONS fC- THESE DOCUMENTS. IN PART OR IN STREETLIGHTS COLLABORATIVE „ DESIGN -. _. MT. 59108-0467 • EXA p .. - - r� 3 :�,. VG, fi•:t i r_ The DMS50 luminaire consists of a C _ sealed optical chamber made of a hydro- 23/tr(60 mml Insertion 23/8•(60 mm) j outside diameter outside diameter I formed reflector permanently sealed on tube adaptor r-1 of tenon tube adaptor r l Insertion _ 2-(51 mml of tenon f emtm, ef]M$ aa �y an injected refractor,with internal prisms 2 I51 mml S!�!" alstnco or-:a�e'i3 only(SHA/SSA optics).SCB/SHB optics c R #.er ea t) Ea _Fti�e M use a tampered-glass lens. �^ A toolfree lamp access shutter and E s E E E E "OP sleeve,with self-adjusting injection- a r. > E e- E Uan lded silicone gasket keep the cn 2zo '^ A-me-0.1 j balms` optical chamber hermetically sealed. �" use The optical system is placed in a cast- a t s„ 1.�_•K_t17 gfla Optica� aluminum technical ring,which is S lia assembled in a spun and cast-aluminum E, 1 -i Intn ' ....e_- E I 271rI E tea- .: housing suspended under a cast-alu- ( mm) E urri�ratces photo sins. m . ' minum fitter. A large,bell-shaped spun-aluminum a fit, iris ornrance- skirt is mechanically assembled to the ' 271R technical ring. (698 mm) r} an'slatl3"'s1gt1� s� EPA.1.35 s.n oytre p.vrattage„ftrt�t/C The DMS50 is UL and CSA 4 EPA lA0 sq.n nC a7RConsUm f �k approved. Weight 421bsp9.lkg) WeighC421bsp9.lkg) °aI ence 0 e r 1 s sefnak°este7e ac o - a£ DMS50-SHA/SSA DMS50-SHB/SCB I tt�rztn fteegora,Urxtnofi� � F rfhe opuca system'r �.. �'j si �y,'' a o r 1 e o a 3 d t 1 Dili$�fl °and SSAtSealsafe a cal�� $ DMS50/60 4�tr �c 1rx t SHA&SSA optics IF A 180'bent section of ham 'efehver excephonaf Wattage sHAissA SCB/SHB x�r its r .ate a � Sealed optical chamber r extruded aluminum 2 3/8,fc performancet inks ;, 70 MH,mediumn consisting of a reflector (60 mm)O.D.,mechani- bination of stag Of tfle 100 MH,medium — — s y;• • iJ; permanently assembled on sally assembled to the ttreflect On 7efractof.Ywhlch � 175 MH,mogul — — top of a prismatic refractor. side of a pole. tmnITMIZe. glare ��,�, y 25o MH,mogul — SHAM: � � = ,4 g Asyminetricalhypertdnsive(111) FM A 1801 bent section of �►/Ith,3 el colnbinafiotl o stxate 4tro MH,mogul N/A • SHA4L• Asyrmeticalhyperextt�ve(N) extruded aluminum 23/8' = tnf the. arC�7eflei for and to erect s — — SSA3M: Asymmetrical semi cut-off(III) t!1r �4P; 70 HPS,mogul a (60 mm)O.D.,welded lass ett SH�a di=Se�lsa z a too HPS,mogul — — to a cast-aluminum pole In the above optics,the sleeve and shutter optical cTrarnberstifferexceoiral 150 HPS,mogul adaptor and a flat rolled r 4 9u( — — permit exactpositioningofthelamp. 9 aluminum spiral. oto e C pet#brmancel�a litre 1 -z &t�a ,rcr u 25o HPS,mogul — SHA&SSA refractors available in: ass f trratrtenance � �� MM A 2 3/8"(60 mm)round . zr.: 3r ', 400HPS,mogul N/A • - OOf free'aceess to ftlam )fla x ' ACDR: Acrylic(175 W max.) aluminum arm welded . n r �pz p a • Remote ballast in mounting or le base d issue antl shditer.andWb.iiIft y�� 9 PC: Polycarbonate to a 41/2"(114 mm)O.D. PM, • Requires areducedlacket lamp . poleadaptocThemoun- ytFlatslit�gs lns)deN a ' box rresaPol rbonaterefracror. Add suffix to optical system code. ling is complete with I s npabtittttotheeasesof atnte° u. ire• :ss" 5 DMS50T"`and DMS60TIA Domus Series two bent decorative rods, �(1Ce*Chdracteri UE oEOotr•�t sk luminaires accommodate H.I.D.or SCB&SHB optics spheres and a cast-alu- to . �i � incandescent lamps as shown in Sealed optical chamber minum luminaire adaptor. Z_H�` : � the above table. consisting of a reflector er- flttltsperformaece is tncocpt7 , v' c rr �� maven assembled on to NM A 1800 bent section of to n shrlistt well deslgneid uniff HPS ballasts feature a-40F(-40C•) p extruded aluminum 23/8" ! a i� 'N-�� r of a tempered-glass sag lens. i at fi kes f)aiuS luminalfes7dea a lamp starting capacity with a high xt �eKx�tt _ (60 mm)O.D.,with east- osrC.Or11aotryladscapts r "� power factor of 90%and operate within SCB3M: Asymmetrical cut-off(III) aluminum decorative tltlFbt din s ANSI trapezoidal limits.MH ballasts SHB3M: Asymmetrical hyperextensive(Ilqspirals,and a pole adap feature a-20F(-30C•)lamp starting dafstirface treatmem In the above optics,the sleeve and shutter CCI tar.The mounting slip fits t� -W-4 y r capacity with a high power factor of into a 4"(102 mm) of 11um(natrES mOUnttn s •.' permit exact positioning of the lamp. pole z y 90%.All ballasts are UL recognized , �estiel led: &M Lrenrtal'" _� and CSA certified. (tamps not included) 4`OM Two straight 1 5B" t et► w ltElr '> For furtherin/ormanon,referto the (41 mm)O.D.aluminum ee The ballast is integrated in the hood g B Application —, side arms welded to R fUpn'6i~all Outdoorti Lighting A icaaonGuide. a •�,,.�4,�.a,,,,,,,,,�. - of the luminaire while the unitized �OFt�e pI1C2T �" ballast tray slides into a ballast box - a 4"(102 mm)round . D,"esol that is mechanically assembled onto aluminum pole adaptor the optical support late. and to a cast-aluminum C_ fist) MCI -� P PP P luminaire adaptor. RM A23/8-(60 mm)O.D. aluminum arm welded to a 4"(102 mm)round pole adaptor and a cast-alu- minum luminaire adaptor, with decorative half- sphere.A structural 1/2' (13 mm)rod is welded to the arm and pole adaptor. Ordering Sample amp a c,• a' r r 100HPS I OMS50 SHA3L-ACDR 120 IF-lA R80-15 GNTX FS-LR Lumec reserves the right to substitute materials or change the manufacturing process of its products without prior notification. 1`G 4 DM950 Luminaire with SegmentedCut-offOptics: I I The DMSSOIuminaire can accomodate SG and SE segmented optical systems. z31e 160 mm) 23f8.160 mm) j Insertion Insertion ~ Toolfree access to the interior of outside diameter outside diameter . i tube adaptor n of tenon tube adaptor n of tenon 0 BDme(Lfl the luminaire permits easy access 7(51 mm) z(51 mm) to the lamp. t ail8fi16 a a The optical system is placed in a m �" cast-aluminum technical ring,which E E E E is assembled in housing housing. :; rous S _ SSfn A flat tempered glass lens is standard - sa with SG optics,while the SE optical -v systems require a sag tempered . _ { glass lens.p.t E rea 27Ifr t C E E -E �. e ca orma'nce IWBmm) _ I 77.1/2- i Irltl[rl Co �1-Vtlf1 fM. (69a mm) ; vs t 's'4•5irx"': x, ,Q 7 x EPA:1.00 sq.ft. EPA:1.20 sq.ft. j Weight 421bsIIll kg) Weight 42lbs(19.1 kg) e 3; 1=t" S50=SS 1 „�-o�„ba a ii ertt:e x �oo(fcee;acce;;s3othe 1[ltenor ofi T` DMS50-SE DMG DL 011SIfEg;Vta a'�SLCh1Cotl�it Ute§ DMS50 with SE optics and DMS50 with SG optics and a drop lens(DL) to a sag lens(standard) f E e�t.ma ni nancE c ar.�� t rat . Ct tiisWc ofr musi enesg. ,r r tt tt t ttce ueatrem�Sh - ; itumin rces moonUngs and: k.:. DMS50/60 optics FS Fusing(consult Lumec) '• oles"af pinteced6ytliettelTM , Wattage SG SE Segmented cut-off reflector HS House shield tirfacerea`inerK vuhlch,tfNotves 70 MH,medium — — system set in faceted arc- � DL Polycarbonate drop lens I etC�6rm�capr�eparton o£all 100 MH,medium — — image duplicating patterns (SG and SE optics only) uface.5 rttitheapphea0on s 175 MH,mogul - - SGl Asymmetrical(I) Af a Dating of po�istera`Sed� - - SL Tempered glass sag lens „ 250 MH,mogul (SG optics only) �> "redfpowder forsuper►or � ) 400 MH,mogul . . SG2' tAsyrnmetiical.pf► , I °reSlstanee SG3, Asymmetrical(111) Luminous dome try R q _` z; PS mogul, — — Maximum 175W 70 H c i SGD: Symmetrical(VI t z 3x C�' 100 HPS,mogul — — (available with SG optics only) < :. SGFM: Forward-throw LR Luminous ring 1u Y Y� 150 HPS,mogul Maximum 115W t a- t.}4 250 HPS,mogul — — SE optics (available with SG optics only) 400 HPS,mogul • • Small hydrofonned cut-off (ballast mustbe remote -� in the mountin or pole) y� � z? ' r • Remote ballast in mounting or pole base reflector system set in g p ) faceted arc-image FB Rat base spinning $ - • Requires a redtrced jacket lamp. jwx duplicating patterns. i r+,N DMS50-and DMS601M Domus Series luminaires accommodate H.I.D.or SE3: Asymmetrical(p i incandescent lamps as shown in SE5: Symmetrical M k the above table. Please consult factory for details. to HPS ballasts feature a-40F(-40C`) (Clear lamps not included) yark� lamp starting capacity With ahigh For furdterinformador4referrothe power factor of 90%and operate within Outdoor Lighting Application Guide. ANSI trapezoidal limits.MH ballasts *, r feature a-20F(•30C')lamp starting 1� sq capacitywith a high powerfactorof t ua hem. I ft ", 1 90%.All ballasts are ULrecognized i x e e c(i q D � f� � and CSA certified. DMS50 r op o I (77tYst� nrk,tume" �j-. ;� d f . antt7arl eirres 5: '� The ballast is integrated in the hood (fr�dutfi a m 70 1 of the luminaire. zags'(60 mm) 23fe•(w mm) t(� Insertion Insertion j .. ,{^ outside diameter outside diameter SlR t Sf81t tube ado for r-1 of tenon tube ado for t, of tenon p ]51 mm) � p i 2*(51 mm) (,jCIJIER c°i E ci E * l r 3s 75Y E t..n- E DJ -t r. i E I 27112' I (88 mm) S. t 271 rr I $ .• (698 mm) �tlnle EPA:1.2r1 sq.ft. EPA:1.20 sq.ft. Weigbt42lbs(19.1 kg) Weight 421bsI19.1 kg) ' OMS50-SG-LR-DL OMS50-SG-LD < .r DMS50 with SG optics, DMS50 with SG optics, ft1 . a luminous 669(LRI and a drop lens(DL) and a luminous dome RD) j r. r9 ® DMS60 The 0MS60luminaire consists of a n 1/7 zdaD mm) sealed optical chamber made of a h dro- (ago mm) outsideide di diameter P Y tube adaptor 1"t Insertion formed reflector permanently sealed on oftenon ZA 2•(51 mm) an injected refractor,with internal prisms m r only(SHA/SSA optics).SCB/SHB optics use a tempered-glass lens. a'`s 0� p Is E lit E A tooHree lamp access shutter and E'6 nti o< a sleeve,with self-adjusting injection- .� E J^ gx� _ molded silicone gasket keep the e optical chamber hermetically sealed. o_ The optical system is surrounded by a one-piece,two-arm,cast-aluminum e E 1 n tR- 1 !Z!E cradle welded to the bottom piece (698 mm) —e of a cast-aluminum technical ring. — A large aluminum hood and a deflector are mechanically assembled on the top c. part of the technical ring. I_1 Insertion depth EPA 1.0csq.fL A large,bell-shaped spun-aluminum 41/a•0I.D. 4,(fte�) Weight:4210 sq.f l kg) skirtis mechanically assembled to the (105 mm) bottom section of the technical ring. EPA.1.82 sq.ft OMS50-SCB/SHB-FB The DMS60 luminaire is UL and CSA Weight 401bs(18.1 kg) DMS50 with SHA/SSA optics approved and a flat base spinning(FB) DMS60-SHA I t t ' t •; I t 1 16 Standard Colors Available FS Fusing(consult Lumec) -0 0­0 —12 . HS House shield 1A 2 2A 7.66 The specially-formulated textured(TX) Lumital powder coat is available in a FB flat base spinning range of 16 standard colors.This unique q t0 coating of thermosetting polyester resins I db o . 3.05 provides a highly-durable UV-resistant 3 38 4 exterior finish as per ASTM G7. H8 Hinged base Lumital coatings are specially formulated 1APR4&APS4 poles only) o a for outstanding salt-spray resistance z44 according to ASTM B117 standards. DR Duplex receptacle M (1211 vales only) All surfaces are chemically treated using GFI' Duplex receptacle with 6 a four-step(aluminum)or six-step(steel) ground fault interrupter Typical wall mounting detail 183 process prior to painting.Consult Lumec s only) for Domus luminaire mountings for complete specifications. PH Photoelectric hottoellectric cell Tyr SC Special Color LS' Provision for loudspeaker outlet d Provide a 4'V02 mm)square color chi p. BA* Banner arm horizontal junction box P .,,.i±. ,`•:, (by other) It is possible wall P IP Interior paint(pole only, e •''�"i`•;. .� @ bracket quantities of powder paint at a consult factory for applicable poles) = premium.Your representative Will be 0.61 able to tell you if a powder coating can LBC Optional base cover F= Zy Consult facto for feasibility with be developed for your project factory tY i •:n'; cast-aluminum shafts. t fit,= Lumiseal,a biofriendly reactive organic conversion coating,is applied Base cover for APR4&SPR4 poles only APR4 APR4 6.SM6� R80 " a &lBC2 ` """ &TBCt on all aluminum parts that are subject (replace standard base cover). to salt-spray corrosion.Consult Lumec G 7hd'122 mm) aOo p s' Mar.bolt l: t , for complete specifications. projection b b d rOd SOS Please note that where quantities }� 1 Access doatJ " Or,6Y4' lit,6yf Bt to lfr 84121? do not warrant it,Lumec reserves (� 1171 nun) (171 mm) U67mm) 1318mm) the right to use an oven-cured liquid LB CZ LBC3 polyurethane finish. fh7illl Consult the Pole Guide for details Consult the Pole Guide for details 1� and the complete line ofmountings. and the complete fine of poles. is B� LBC4C/S LBC9 B104 Registered Lumec inc. ..uavv. .w. .. �o .• I v— �f, � r Inbox for rdaleM@Y ahoo.com* Yahoo! -My Yahoo! Options-Sign Out- Help Mail ] Addresses M Calenda b. Notepad Reply Reply All Forward as attachment (:� Download Attachments Delete Prev Next�.lnbox Choose Folder- - r Move - - Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:56:09 -0700 From: "Phillip Forbes" I Block Address I Add to Address Book To: bmurray@bozemm.net, cbrawner@bozeman.net, darkell@bozeman.net, "James Nickelson" , rdaleb4@yahoo.com CC: doug@pa-hln.com Subject: Baxter Meadows- Baxter Road improvements In proposing making the reconstruction of Baxter Road east of the project a condition of the first phase, I was concerned that if safety of bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists was the issue, safety starts with the first house. I was also concerned that there could be a painful period of time between Williams' construction activities breaking the road down and Williams' "fixing" the road. However, I talked with Doug Widmayer this am about his intent regarding the subject recommendation in the TIS. After a brief discussion, he stated his recommendation to reconstruct the road, complete with 5' shoulders, was made based on traffic volumes. He stated he felt the most appropriate time to require the widened section on Baxter was with Phase 3, when a significant increase in volumes on Baxter is predicted. Based on Craig's e-mail from last week, it appears we may add the widening to the list of exceptions in condition #6 for the Phase 1 PUD subdivision. The issue can be revisited with each subsequent phase. Phill Click a Q to send an instant message to an online friend Q=Online,(=Offline Delete Prev I Next I Inbox -Choose Folder- 1.1 Move Reply Reply All ForwardI as Wachmenti� Download Attachments d Yahoo! Personals- where millions of singles meet. Q Address Book•Alerts•Auctions•Bill Pa v•Bookmarks•Briefcase•Broadcast-Calendar•Chat Classifieds-Clubs•Companion•Domains Experts-Games-Greetings•Home Pages•Invites•Mail•Maps•Member Directory-Messen-ge My Yahoo!•News•PavDirect•People Search Personals•Photos•Shopping-marts•Stock Quotes•TV•Travel•Weather Yahooligans Yellow Pages-more... Privacy Policy-Terms of Service-Guidelines Copyright©1994-2001 Yahoo!Inc.All rights reserved. 1 of 1 11/13/01 7:09 AM �� .. - ;�. � -t ...�. � G� 1 / y � i f � .. 1 � � � � i � � � � � f ? � � .X .. � � .. . � _. A ' , � � .1 •. t 1 •�� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TUESDAY,NOVEMBER 6,2001 10:00 A.M. CONFERENCE ROOM,ALFRED M.STIFF BUILDING,20 EAST OLIVE STREET AGENDA A. SECOND WEEK REVIEW 1. Ressler Oil and Lube Building MiSP/COA-#Z-01206—(Skelton) 1735 West Main Street * A Minor Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a 1320+ square foot building, for the purpose of an oil change and Tube shop. B. FIRST WEEK REVIEW 1. Lessley Annexation-#A-0110—(Skelton) 2300 Block of West Babcock Street * An Annexation Application to annex 10.64 acres into the City of Bozeman. 2. Lessley ZMA-#Z-0121 -(Grund) 2300 Block of West Babcock Street �k A Zone Map Amendment Application to establish urban zoning of R-4(Residential,High Density)zoning on 10.64 acres. 3. ABC Natural Foods ZMA-#Z-01215—(Grund) 1425 West Main Street �k A Zone Map Amendment Application to change the present zoning of R-3 to B-2. 4. Dunbar and Frazier Terrace Buildings-#Z-01216—(Caroline) 450 East Main Street&25 South Church Avenue �k A Major Site Plan Application with Certificate of Appropriateness and Deviations to develop .50 acres into two buildings,parking structure and improvements to an existing parking lot. C. FINAL WEEK REVIEW 1. Baxter Meadows MaSUB PUD Preliminary Plat#P-0128\(Beland) 4598 Baxter Lane East - v * A Major Subdivision PUD Preliminary Plat Application to develop Phase I, 64.66 acres, into 144 lots for mixed use. 2. Baxter Meadows Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan-#Z-01204—'--(Be-land) 4598 Baxter Lane East - �k A Conditional Use Permit Application for a Preliminary Plan Zoning P.U.D. to construct a mixed use development on 64.66 acres which is located in the Baxter Meadows Subdivision P.U.D. D. ONE OF A ONE WEEK REVIEW 1. Zone Code Revisions—(Saunders) # Discussion of staff participation. E. ADJOURNMENT F. TEMPORARY/FINAL OCCUPANCY PERMITS-STATUS DISCUSSION-(Bldg.Div.) This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,please contact-ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2305(voice)or 582-2301 (TDD). y THE CITY OF ®OZEMA'N 814 N. BOZEMAN AVE. P.O. BOX 1230 BOZEMAN, MONTANA 5977 1-1 230 * PHONE (406) 582-3200 FAX (406) 582-3201 Ct==- - -= - e CITY SHOP COMPLEX To: Dale Beland From: Mike Certalic, Water/Sewer Superintendent ,at Date: November 1, 2001 Re% Baxter Meadows Comments from September r, 2001: • Phasing of this development shall include full time vehicle access to all water and sewer infrastructure for maintenance. • All water mains exceeding 500'shall be looped. • Termination of water mains for each phase shall not include a valve as shown in the concept plan Extensions of these mains shall begin with a valve. • Symbols for fire hydrants, water valves water mains etc_ shall be consistent with City of Bozeman Modifications to the Montana Public Works Standards. The concept plan does not identify accordingly. • The Sanitary Sewer Concept Plan does not clearly identify lift stations and/or force mains. The Iegend does not label these correctly. • The City of Bozeman recognizes the need for and will maintain a centralized sanitary sewer lift station that is in accord with an expanded wastewater facilities plan which includes this development. However,the City will not sustain costs of maintaining multiple satellite lift stations to enable development of sites that cannot be served by a gravity sanitary sewer collection system. Comments in October,2001: • The proposed 12"water main in Baxter Lane should be extended to Harper Pucket Road • The proposed 12"water main in Dead Mans Gulch should be extended to Harper Pucket Road- The loop between Dead Mans Gulch and Baxter Lane should be completed via Harper Pucket Road. • The axillary valve is directly connected to the hydrant, not as shown. • All water and sewer infrastructure with appurtenance must be shown on the site landscape,paving plans and drainage plans. HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK THE CITY OF SOZEMAIN U 814 �7. 9, 0ZEMAN sAvE. P.C. Box 1230 9OZEMAN, MONTANA 597.1-1230 PHONE (406) 582-3200 FAX (406) 582-3201 CITY SHOP COMPLEX CO. • Sampling manholes should be included on the veterinary service line and the community bed and breakfast service line and any building/facility that produces waste water that may adversely impact our waste water collection/treatment systenL • Placement of infrastructure in roundabout, IE:manhole,valve boxes,may cause conflicts and encumber maintenance. Placement of these appurtenances will require special consideration. • Installation,Inspection, Certification, Approval of infrastructure must be completed in each sub phase prior to acceptance by the City. This shall take place prior to activation of municipal services and occupancy. • Installation of all water and sanitary sewer infrastructure must comply with City of Bozeman modification to the Montana Public Works Standard.Exhibif s shows deficits in this,particularly relating to water/sewer separation. • The sanitary sewer and water service lines shown on Sheet 2 of the preliminary plat for the Townhomes is not acceptable. Townhomes require individual water and sanitary sewer service connections to the mains. • Sanitary sewer services with direct connection to manholes as shown on Sheet 2 of the preliminary plot are not acceptable. Service connections must be connected to a sanitary sewer main. • Multiple water and sanitary sewer service line crisscrossing may encumber installation. These are shown throughout the exhibits. • Water service connection can not be made on Fire Hydrant legs. Fire Hydrants must be Tee commected from the water main. • The City will assume responsibility and maintenance of the lift station at the Homeowners Association expense. MC/md HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE. PARK O] MORRISON ®® MMERLE,INC. memo An Employee-Owned Company TO: City of Bozeman Development Review Committee R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP FROM: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. RE: Baxter Meadows Conditional Use Permit and Phase 1 PUD Subdivision Applications DATE: November 6, 2001 (Revised —Additional Conditions,38 and,39) The following conditions of final approvals are offered for consideration by the DRC in any approvals of the referenced applications. Conditional Use Permit: VAI The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be updated and made a part of the application materials submitted for approval of each and all subsequent phases of subdivision. 2. All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of- way and provisions for bicyclists, shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. Specifically, Exhibit"C" Street Sections shall be revised as follows: • A. Baxter Lane to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-3; • B. Ferguson Avenue to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2; • C. Equestrian Lane to 60 ft. ROW; • F. Gallatin Green to 56 ft. ROW; • J. Arabian Court, et al to 60 ft. ROW; • Davis . Road Initial to dimensions included in Beland memo of 9/19/01 to Williams (excerpt attached); • Davis Road Future to mirror image of Davis Road Initial; and • Deadmans Gulch to u2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2; Y`.. .� r.h. .� K�./�Y',a, t 55 � `�r Su N`r` r. i'(..'\'. I , ".1,%:r. .�' - , i •'1 '1,. J _. � ��,( . 'jt r ns ..• ..,. ...:4' .. .., " Whir.,.. , .. T'„ 'I ,��,• „ r f."ls' r ��n'. .., I`•. •'I: I t ,' .'i 1 i�1 r� s`J .t, i. }�t' •,,. r n .. i�f e r!j•. .. .. . , r, / '`. r �� � /+ . r .,.at:r y t4• ..1 rr..•,=' ....r I •? ,. N an, (''. V .. 5•, Ise r.?..I .,� • 'r,I' r.. .i't. 'J •• I .. .. .J^_ , \ �,'+'6r• ., ' I �. rn,r ' ,l ni �. �;`. �• � .. .'r I . r`' 1'!'r"��' ., .. ., It ,�} r,,; . . • . • a ,. j •. ` ..I� .. .. '�•• ... !Ire n, r 3. A variance to the lot access (frontage) standards in the City Code shall be granted by the City Commission to allow primary lot access off alleys. Snow removal responsibility in alleys used as primary vehicular access to lots shall be private. 4. Stormwater Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the planned unit development for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot and/or phase. 5. The final plan shall coordinate the proposed landscaping with the proposed water and sewer utilities in a manner acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 6. The applicant is advised that the water and sewer infrastructure required for each phase of development shall be subject to further review. 7. The preliminary plan shows public sidewalks crossing onto Town Home lots. The final plan shall identify such sidewalks and show proposed easements. The final plat for each phase shall grant access easements to the public at these locations. r 1'�'}' ', '•,. 1'f 1i Its. , . '1. , , •t �(.(. r .. .i.! r•T' • .fir. • r , ..l ..r it•.♦. 1 1� i •' • • s' 1 . • J T .. . '� .. .. .. .. 1•is ... • _�.; , '• • }..t • ,I " r...r r J Phase 1 PUD Subdivision: 1. All provisions of the Baxter Meadows Annexation Agreement relating to "filing of any Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Plan approval, or the issuance of any building permit" shall be met, as agreed. 2. Sufficient rights-of-way shall be dedicated and/or acquired as necessary for construction of the proposed modern roundabouts. 3. The modern roundabouts shall be designed by, or peer reviewed by, a professional engineer with roundabout design experience, as determined by the City Engineer. 4. A street and traffic control signage plan for the subdivision shall be prepared and implemented upon review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. One-foot wide "no access" strips shall be placed along Baxter Lane, as appropriate to preclude direct lot access onto Baxter Lane, excepting the two accesses to Lot 142 shown on the Site Plan. 6. All of the recommendations (excerpt attached) made in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Baxter Meadows Development by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be implemented with Phase 1 unless specifically identified to be completed with a later phase. Two exceptions are noted: • No improvements to the intersections of Oak Street and Baxter Lane with North 19th Avenue must be completed with Phase 1; and • A decision regarding on-street parking restrictions, if any, on the Baxter Parkway will be made by the City at a later phase. 7. Baxter Lane shall be fully improved to the appropriate typical section where adjacent to Phase 1. Where Phase 1 includes only one side of Baxter Lane, one half of the appropriate typical section plus an additional 11' driving lane and 5' paved shoulder shall be provided. Maintenance of on-site areas and facilities such as the sewage lift station, alleys, pocket parks, equestrian open space, etc. shall be provided as proffered in the application materials, with the exception that the sewage lift station shall be operated and maintained by the City with the costs of said maintenance being borne by the Property Owners' Association. The Property Owners' Association documents shall provide for reimbursing the City for all such expenses. • • �t is " ... .� .. � ... �. v .. � , � � � , .1~ t c. ..i� � n 1. a �. (f". �i -� � .. � -. . .. 9. The emergency access to Baxter Lane from Riata Road shall be constructed. 10.A temporary turnaround shall be provided at the east end of the Equestrian Lane improvements. 11.All street names are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 12.The sidewalk along the east side of Lot 107 shall be extended to the walk on Baxter Lane. 13.The lot numbers on the final plat shall utilize a block and lot numbering scheme as required by Section 16.14.030 E. of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. 14.Prior to filing of the final plat a site plan, complying with the requirements of Section 18.52.030 of the City Zoning Ordinance, for Lots 1 through 27 shall be submitted for review and approval. 15.The applicant shall provide easements, in a form acceptable to the city, for all on and off site sewer and water improvements. All water and sewer main easements shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 16.Easements shall be provided for all offsite drainage facilities. 17.Utility easements shall be granted on the final plat in accordance with the requirements of Section 16.14.050 of the City Subdivision Regulations. 18.The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits for all utilities proposed to be installed in a County right of way. 19.City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the plat and in the covenants for the subdivision. 20.The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, MPDES etc.) shall be obtained prior to construction of the associated improvements. �r ..s. .. �t�. ., .. .?': .. • ... ....t r _ .. .. .. - f: .f: t' -y ' .�.1:. ..l . r. ri. .r. ti _1 1! .ter. .t .r .:l . r .. .. f + . sJ . � .. �;r4 .:1 a r. .. rA .. w •.I�i ``. .rs . . � � 1' e,l'. r r.1`. I f J 1 . r .. � - � *' .i .1... "l,ti ' J .. '�� r r 1 r,r .. . y t •1 . a rf � .. ! 1 . � rr. ... l�ifr�, •.. r -..}+r• f•. • r r r ' . f � ...' � r r . .. 4r i1• ... y r I c. , .. ' r ..., •, i i� � r' f ,-. '1.�.. � .. r.... 1' .r � .. 21.All infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. 22.Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. 23.Provisions for extending sewer mains to adjoining unsubdivided land shall be made in accordance with Section 16.14.100 D of the City Subdivision Regulations. 24.All proposed manholes need to be accessible to the city's large flusher truck. The applicant shall submit an all weather access plan with the project infrastructure plans subject to approval by the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 25.The proposed sewer service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. 26.The water line in Baxter shall be extended to the west boundary of the Phase 1 Subdivision Jn accordance with the provisions of Section 16.14.120 F of the City Subdivision Regulations. The water line in Riata Road shall tie into the water line in Baxter Lane to eliminate the dead end main shown on the preliminary plat. 27.The water line in Riata Road near Lot 137 shall be extended to the north to tie into the proposed water line in Ferguson Road. 28.The water system shall be looped and be connected to the existing 12" water line in Deadman's Gulch Road or Catron Street and the existing water line in Oak Street. 29.The proposed water service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. • ••� f'.t'. �. •1•.. Y .. r .. ., , I .. ,' ,; , • �. � .f .. `,1 Y .. ) „ . .. � � � it �. r ' r. . . .2 <1• �t. . 30.An access road, acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent, shall be constructed to service all on and offsite water improvements. 31.As part of the infrastructure plan submittal, 100 year flood elevations shall be computed for the Spring Ditch and the Baxter-Border Ditch, and the limits of flooding identified. If flooding limits encroach onto proposed lots, this shall be noted on the final plat along with a minimum floor elevation for the structures to be constructed on the lots. 32.The Property Owners' Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all storm water facilities constructed for the project. 33.The applicant shall obtain permission from the appropriate ditch companies to discharge storm runoff into the ditches and for any relocation(s). 34.All ditch easements and setbacks shall be shown on the final plat. 35.The infrastructure plans shall include a detailed grading plan identifying the elevation of all proposed structures. 36.Watercourse setbacks in accordance with Section 16.14.130 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations shall be shown on the final plat. 37.In locations where Baxter Lane is being improved, the various irrigation ditches and stream-ditches shall be either relocated outside of the right-of- way or placed in a pipe. 38.The alley streets shall be maintained by the Property Owners'Association. 39.The alley streets shall be paved to a minimum width of 20 feet. ' f .. .. .o ry t � ODMORRISON ME] MAIERLE, INC. men An Emplovee-Uvned Company , TO: City of Bozeman Development Review Comm" ittee R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP FROM: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. RE: Baxter Meadows Conditional Use Permit and Phase 1 PUD Subdivision App ications DATE: November 6, 2001 The following conditions of final approvals are offered for consideration by the DRC in any approvals of the referenced applications. Conditional Use Permit: 1. The Traffic Impact1 Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be updated and made a part of the application materials submitted for approval of each and all subsequent phases of subdivision. 2. All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of- way andiprovisions for bicyclists, shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. Specifically, Exhibit "C" Street Sections shall be revised as follows: \ • A. Baxter Lane to a2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-3; CTr-"j- B. Ferguson Avenue to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2; • C. Equestrian Lane to 60 ft. ROW; • F. Gallatin Green to 56 ft. ROW; J. Arabian Court, et al to 60 ft. ROW; • Davis Road Initial to dimensions included in Beland memo of 9/19/01 to Williams (excerpt attached); • Davis Road Future to mirror image of Davis Road Initial; and 0 Deadmans Gulch to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2; 0 • 3. A variance to the lot access (frontage) standards in the City Code shall be granted by the City Commission to allow primary lot access off alleys. Snow removal responsibility in alleys used as primary vehicular access to lots shall be private. 4. Stormwater Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the planned unit development for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for, each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot and/or phase. 5. The final plan shall coordinate the proposed landscaping with the proposed water and sewer utilities in a manner acceptable to the. City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 6. The applicant is advised that the water and sewer infrastructure required for each phase of development shall be subject to further review. 7. The preliminary plan shows public sidewalks crossing onto Town Home lots. The final plan shall identify such sidewalks and show proposed easements. The final plat for each phase shall grant access easements to the public at these locations. Phase 1 PUD Subdivision: 1. All provisions of the Baxter Meadows Annexation Agreement relating to "filing of any Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Plan approval, or the issuance of any building permit" shall be met, as agreed. 2. Sufficient rights-of-way shall be dedicated and/or acquired as necessary for construction of the proposed modern roundabouts. 3. The modern roundabouts shall be designed by, or peer reviewed by, a professional engineer with roundabout design experience, as determined by the City Engineer. 4. A street and traffic control signage plan for the subdivision shall be prepared and implemented upon review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. One-foot wide "no access" strips shall be placed along Baxter Lane, as appropriate to preclude direct lot access onto Baxter Lane, excepting the two accesses of 142 own on the Site Plan. 6. All of the recommendations (excerpt attached) made in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Baxter Meadows Development by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be implemented with Phase 1 unless specifically identified to be completed with a later phase. Two exceptions are noted: • No improvements to the intersections of Oak Street and Baxter Lane with North 1'91h Avenue must be completed with Phase 1; and • A decision regarding on-street parking restrictions, if any, on the Baxter Parkway will be made by the City at a later phase. 7. Baxter Lane shall be fully improved to the appropriate typical section where adjacent to Phase 1. Where Phase 1 includes only one side of Baxter Lane, one half of the appropriate typical section plus an additional 11' driving lane and 5' paved shoulder shall be provided. 8. Maintenance of on-site areas and facilities such as the sewage lift station, alleys, pocket parks, equestrian open space, etc. shall be provided as proffered in the application materials, with the exception that the sewage lift station shall be operated and maintained by the City with the costs of said maintenance being borne by the Property Owners' Association. The Property Owners' Association documents shall provide for reimbursing the city for all such expenses. 9. The emergency access to Baxter Lane from Riata Road shall be constructed. 10.A temporary turnaround shall be provided at the east end of the Equestrian Lane improvements. 11.All street names are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 12.The sidewalk along the east side of Lot 107 shall be extended to the walk on Baxter Lane. 13.The lot numbers on the final plat shall utilize a block and lot numbering scheme as required by Section 16.14.030 E. of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. 14.Prior to filing of the final plat a site plan, complying with the requirements of Section 18.52.030 of the City Zoning Ordinance, for Lots 1 through 27 shall be submitted for review and approval. 15.The applicant shall provide easements, in a form acceptable to the city, for all on and off site sewer and water improvements. All water and sewer main easements shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 16.Easements shall be provided for all offsite drainage facilities. 17.Utility easements shall be granted on the final plat in accordance with the requirements of Section 16.14.050 of the City Subdivision4Relations. 18.The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits for all s proposed to be installed in a County right of way. 19.City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the plat and in the covenants for the subdivision. 20.The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, MPDES etc.) shall be obtained prior to construction of the associated improvements. 21.All infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall . be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. 22.Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and, the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. 23.Provisions for extending sewer mains to adjoining unsubdivided land shall be made in accordance with Section 16.14.100 D of the City Subdivision Regulations. 24.All proposed manholes need to be made accessible to the city's large flusher truck. The applicant shall submit an all weather access plan with the project infrastructure plans subject to approval by the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 25.The proposed sewer service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. 26.The water line in Baxter shall be extended to the west boundary of the Phase 1 Subdivision in accordance with the provisions of Section 16.14.120 F of the City Subdivision Regulations. The water line in Riata Road shall tie into the water line in Baxter Lane to eliminate the dead end main 'shown on the preliminary plat.. 27.The water line in Riata Road near Lot 137 shall be.extended to the north to tie into the proposed water line in Ferguson Road. 28.The water system shall be looped and be connected to the existing 12" water line in Deadman's Gulch Road or Catron Street and the existing water line in Oak Street. 29.The proposed water service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. 30.An access road, acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent, shall be constructed to service all on and offsite water improvements. 31.As part of the infrastructure plan submittal, 100 year flood elevations shall be computed for the Spring Ditch and the Baxter-Border Ditch, and the limits of flooding identified. If flooding limits encroach onto proposed lots, this shall be noted on the final plat along with a minimum floor elevation for the structures to be constructed on the lots. 32.The Property Owners' Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all storm water facilities constructed for the project. 33.The applicant shall obtain permission from the appropriate ditch companies to discharge storm runoff into the ditches and for any relocation(s). 34.All ditch easements and setbacks shall be shown on the final plat. 35.The infrastructure plans shall include a detailed grading plan identifying the elevation of all proposed structures. 36.Watercourse setbacks in accordance with Section 16.14.130 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations shall be shown on the final plat. 37.In locations where Baxter Lane is being improved, the various irrigation ditches and stream-ditches shall be either relocated outside of the right-of- way or placed in a pipe. i Traffic Impact Analysis Baxter Meadows Development Robert Peccia &Associates Bozeman, Montana October, 2001 Vill. IMPACT SUMMARY The proposed development would have a significant impact on the traffic conditions within the surrounding areas. The traffic study showed that the development would impact numerous intersections along the North 19`n Avenue corridor. The following impacts were identified. • Baxter Lane would be insufficient to meet the needs of the development under full build- out, but would function adequately through Phase two of the development. • A large proportion of the traffic would be funneled through the North 19`n/Oak intersection. With Oak Street connected to the new development, the LOS at this intersection would fall to D even with lane and signal timing improvements. With Oak Street connected to the development the LOS on Baxter Lane would remain at LOS C or better. • The North 19`n/Durston intersection would need to be reconstructed in order to meet the demands of growth within the area, despite the proposed development. The operation of this intersection would be impacted by the proposed development as well as other developments within the area. • All roads south of Durston Road on 19`n Avenue and on Huffine Lane would have minimal impacts from the proposed development. IX. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are provided to help ensure that the proposed development functions with minimal impacts on the road system in the area. • Traffic calming techniques proposed by the developer should be included in the street design. • Provide left-, through-, and right-turn lanes for eastbound traffic at the North 19`n Avenue/Oak Street intersection and North 19`n Avenue/Baxter Lane intersection. • All intersections within the development should be controlled by STOP signs on the minor street approaches. • Dedicated left-turn lanes should be provided within the development at all locations shown in FIGURE 5 of this report. • Baxter Lane between N. 19`n and Davis would probably be damaged be the construction process. The developer should correct any damage to Baxter Lane caused during the construction. • The amount of development generated traffic that will use Baxter Lane between North 19`n and Davis Road warrants that this portion of Baxter be widened to include five-foot-wide paved shoulders on both sides of the road. • Davis Street from Baxter Lane to Oak Street and Oak Street from North 19`n to Davis must 21 Traffic Impact Analysis Baxter Meadows Development Robert Peccia&Associates Bozeman, Montana October, 2001 be completed as part of the initial work in Phase three of the project. • Provide marked pedestrian crossing at all major intersections. • All of the street cross-sections shown in Exhibit "C" should be implemented. • The proposed roundabouts should be designed with a minimum inscribed circle of 110 feet with and outside diameter (at the property line) of at least 142 feet. This size roundabout will provide adequate an adequate turning radius for large trucks(WB-50)and buses.The roundabouts should be designed according to the FHWA design guidelines for modern roundabouts and include all of the appropriate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. • The Baxter Parkway should be designed to minimize traffic conflicts. The number of side road intersections should be minimized and no direct driveway access should be allowed. On-street parking should be kept to a minimum or not allowed.All of these measures will promote the free flow of traffic and encourage the routing of traffic from the development to the Oak Street corridor. • Davis Street between Baxter Lane and Oak Street should be designed to minimize the number of side road intersections in an effort to encourage the free flow of traffic along this corridor. Direct driveway access onto this section of Davis should no be allowed. • The proposed grade separated pedestrian/bicycle crossing under Baxter Lane near the Baxter Parkway should be included as part of the development plan. This will provide an easy and safe route between the residential neighborhood to the north and the parklands to the south of Baxter. 22 / J The following comments were supplied by Morrison-Maierle, as consultant to the City: Streets: 1. The permanent dead end road does not comply with the cul-de-sac or t-turnaround requirement (16.16.010 E). 2. The north end of the one-way couplet transition to a two-way street may function better if it occurred at mid-block; alternatively, continue couplet north through more of the project. 3. Ferguson is identified as a collector and therefore the right-of:way and street section should match those specified in the Transportation Plan. The right-of- way width should be increased to 90 feet. A one-foot centerline striping area should be added and provisions for bikes should be added on both sides of the road. 4. The width of the improvements on Baxter should match the Transportation Plan. Either the 2, 3 or 5 lane section should be utilized with the number of lanes being dependent on future traffic projections. If the 2-lane option is the preferable option based on traffic projections, the lane width needs to be increased to 11 feet and provisions for bikes needs to be made on both sides of the road. 5. Street sections E and F are non-standard ditch section roads. IN the past, these types of roads have been required to be privately maintained. 6. Street section G meets the local k street standard called out in the Transportation Plan wit the exception of the boulevards are each one foot narrower than specified. 7. It is noted that the alleys provide the only vehicular access to the cottage Homes. Does the City have any alley standards?Need to show that City garbage collection trucks can negotiate alley corners, or punch ends of the east-west alley through to street. 8. Street section I matches the local standard called out in the Transportation Plan with the exception that no parking is allowed on the park side of the street. 9. Street section J is a non-standard width. 10. The Davis street section shown on the pre-application plan is different that the recommended section of a 5' sidewalk, a 8.5"boulevard, a 2' curb and gutter section, 2-12' lanes, a 6"curb and a 9' center median. 4 11105161 17:57 0406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE Q001 is • lYl®IlI1.l►7O [30 iY1All'iRLE,INC. AnF.+np1aycc-04wad C—pwy ENGII`tEERS•SCIENMSTS•SURVEYORS•PLANNERS 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD.•P.O.J30X 1113•BOZEMAN,MT 59771. 406-587-0721. FAX 406-587-1176 FAX TRANSMITTAL Date 1 F �'• 0 L By" _ TO: `K ` ' RA A—U b. . S FROM: .0 A-t`F FAX: PAGE 1 off: I 1 SUBJECT: 13gxAwn 4pi4-=gn4m-m1 Or r d OUR FAX NLMMER IS 587-11.76 Beginning Our Second Half Century 11/05/01 17:58 '&406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE 2002 • • ® MORRISON memo �®. MMERLE,iNc. Art EMp4 ("ni Cuuuuny . .._ TO: City of Bozeman Development Review Committee R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP FROM: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. RE: Baxter Meadows Conditional Use Permit and Phase 1 PUD Subdivision Applications DATE: November 5, 2001 The following conditions of final approvals are offered for consideration by the DRC in any approvals of the referenced applications. Conditional Use Permit: 1. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be updated and made a part of the application materials submitted for approval of each and all subsequent phases of subdivision. 2. All typical street sections, including sidewalk location within the right-of- way and provisions for bicyclists, shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2009 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. Specifically, Exhibit "C" Street Sections shall be revised as follows: • A. Baxter Lane to °2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-3; B. Ferguson Avenue to 2 Lane Option"per Figure 11-2, C. Equestrian Lane to 60 ft. ROW; A F. Gallatin Green to 56 ft. ROW; J. Arabian Court, et al to 60 ft. ROW; Davis Road Initial to dimensions included in Beland memo of 9/19/01 to Williams (excerpt attached); • Davis Road Future to mirror image of Davis Road Initial; and • Deadmans Gulch to"2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2, 11i05i01 17:58 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE Z 003 3. A variance to the lot access (frontage) standards in the City Code shall be granted by the City Commission to allow primary lot access off alleys. Snow removal responsibility in alleys used as primary vehicular access to lots shall be private. Phase 1 PUD Subdivision: 1. All provisions of the Baxter Meadows Annexation Agreement relating to "filing of any Final Subdivision .Plat, Final Site Plan approval, or the issuance of any building permit" shall be met,as agreed. 2. Sufficient rights-of-way shall be dedicated and/or acquired as necessary for construction of the proposed modern roundabouts. 3. The modem roundabouts shall be designed by, or peer reviewed by, a professional engineer with roundabout design experience, as determined by the City Engineer. 4. A street and traffic control signage plan for the subdivision shall be prepared and Implemented upon review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. One-foot wide "no access" strips shall be placed along Baxter Lane, as appropriate to preclude direct lot access onto Baxter Lane, excepting the two accesses to Lot 142 shown on the Site Plan. e. All of the recommendations (excerpt attached) made in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Baxter Meadows Development by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be implemented with Phase 1 unless specifically identified to be completed with a later phase. Two exceptions are noted: • No improvements to the intersections of Oak Street and Baxter Lane with North 19t" Avenue must be completed with Phase 1; and • A decision regarding on-street parking restrictions, if any, on the Baxter Parkway will be made by the City at a later phase. 7. Baxter Lane shall be fully improved to the appropriate typical section where adjacent to Phase 1. Where Phase 1 includes only one side of Baxter Lane, one half of the appropriate typical section plus an additional 11' driving lane and 5' paved shoulder shall be provided. S. Maintenance of on-site areas and facilities such as the sewage lift station, alleys, pocket parks, equestrian open space, etc, shall be provided as proffered in the application materials, with the exception that the sewage 11/05/01 17:59 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE 2004 lift station shall be operated and maintained by the City with the costs of said maintenance being bome by the Property Owners' Association. The Property Owners' Association documents shall provide for reimbursing the city for all such expenses. 9_ The emergency access to Baxter Lane from Riata Road shall be constructed. 10.A temporary turnaround shall be provided at the east end of the Equestrian Lane improvements. 11/05/01 17:59 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE 2005 7'retc lmpact Analysis . Baxter Meadows Development Robert Peccia&Associates Bozeman,Montana October, 2001 Vlll. IMPACT SUMMARY The proposed development would have a significant impact on the traffic conditions within the surrounding areas. The traffic study showed that the development would impact numerous intersections along the North 19`h Avenue corridor. The following impacts were identified. Baxter Lane would be insufficient to meet the needs of the development under full build- out,but would function adequately through phase two of the development. • A large proportion of the traffic would be funneled through the North ]9t'/Oak intersection. With Oak Street connected to the new development,the LOS at this intersection would fall to D even with lane and signal timing improvements. With Oak Street connected to the development the LOS on Baxter Lane would remain at LOS C or better. • The North 191h/Dutston intersection would need to be reconstructed in order to meet the demands of a owth within the area.despite the proposed development. The operation of this intersection would be impacted by the proposed development as well as other developments within the area. • All roads south of Durston Road on 19'h Avenue and on Huffine Lane would have minimal impacts from the proposed development. IX. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recon=endations are provided to help ensure that the proposed development functions with minimal impacts on the road system in the area, • Traffic calming techniques proposed by the developer should.be included in the street design. + Provide left-, through-, and right-turn lanes for eastbound traffic at the North 19'h Avenue Oak Street intersection and North 19`h Avenue/Baxter Lane intersection. • AI I intersections within the development should be controlled by STOP signs on the minor street approaches. • Dedicated left-turn lanes should be provided within the development at all locations shown in FIGURE 5 of this report. • Baxter Lane between N. 19`h and Davis would probably be damaged be the construction process. The developer should correct any damage to Baxter Lane caused during the construction. • The amount of development generated traffic that will.use Baxter lane between North 19`h and Davis Road warrants that this portion of Baxter be widened to include five-foot-wide paved shoulders,on both sides of the road. • Davis Street from Baxter Lane to Oak Street and Oak Street from North 19''to Davis must 21 11i05/01 18:00 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE E 006 Tra.ffic Impact Analysis Baxter Meadows Development Robert Feccia&Associates Bozeman,Montana October,2001 be completed as part of the initial work in Phase three of the project. • Provide marked pedestrian crossing at all major intersections. + All of the street cross-sections shown in Exhibit"C"should,be implemented. • The proposed roundabouts should be designed with a minimum inscribed circle of 110 feet with and outside diameter(at the property line)of at least 142 feet.This size roundabout will provide adequate an adequate turning radius for large trucks(WB-50)and buses.The roundabouts should be designed according to the FHWA design guidelines for modern roundabouts and include all of the appropriate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. • The Baxter Parkway should be designed to nninimize traffic conflicts.The number of side road intersections should be minimized and no direct driveway access should be allowed. On-street parking should be kept to a minimrun or not allowed.All of these measures will promote the free flow of traffic and encourage the routing of traffic from the development to the Oak Street corridor. • Davis Street between Baxter Lane and Oak Street should be designed.to minimize the number ofside road intersections in an effort to encourage the free flow of traffic along this corridor.Direct driveway access onto this section of Davis should no be allowed. e The proposed grade separated pedestrian/bicycle crossing under Baxter Lane near the Baxter Parkway should be included as port of the development plan.This will proNzde an easy and safe route between the residential neighborhood to the north and the park-1 ands to the south of Baxter. 22 11i05i01 18:01 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE Z 007 The following comments were supplied by Morrison-Maierie,as consultant to the City. Streets: 1. The permanent dead end road does not comply with the cul-de-sac or t-turnaround requirement(16.16.010 E). 2. The north end of the one-way couplet transition to a two-way street may function better if it occurred at mid-block;alternatively,continue couplet north through more of the project. 3. Ferguson is identified as a collector and therefore the right-of-way and street section should match those specified in the Transportation Plan.. The right-of- way width should be increased to 90 feet. A one-foot ccntcrline striping area should be added and provisions for bikes should be added on both sides of the mad. 4. The width of the improvements on Bauer should match the Transportation Plan. Either the 2,3 or 5 lane section should be utilized with the number of lanes being dependent on future traffic projections. If the 2-lane option is the preferable option based on traffic projections, the laps width needs to be increased to 11 feet and provisions for bn7-es needs to be.made-on both sides of the road. 5. Street sections E and F are non-standard ditch section roads. IN the past, these types of roads have been required to be privately maintained. 6. Street section G meets the local k street standard called out in the Transportation Plan wit the exception of the boulevards are each one foot narrower than specified. 7. It is noted that the alleys provide the only vehicular access to the cottage Homes. Does the City have any alley standards?Need to show that City garbage collection trucks can negotiate alley corners,or punch ends of the east-west alley through to street. S. Street section I matches the local standard called out in the Transportation Plan with the exception that no parking is allowed on the park side of the street. 9. Street section] is a non-standard width. 10.The Davis street section shown on the pre-application plan is different that the recommended section of a 5' sidewalk, a 8.5" boulevard,a 2' curb and gutter section,2-12' lanes,a C"curb and a 9' center median- 4 11/05/01 18:01 V406 587 1176 MORRISON BLAIERLE [it008 Planned Unit Development Comments (Draft 11-05-2001) Stormwater Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate dralnage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation Information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a,park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual leas will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot and/or phase. Landscape Plan The final plan shall coordinate the proposed landscaping with the proposed water and sewer utilities in a manner acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. Water and Sewer The applicant is advised that the water and sewer infrastructure required for each phase of development shall be subject to further review. Sidewalk and Access The preliminary plan shows public sidewalks crossing onto individual lots. The final plan shall identify such sidewalks and show proposed easements. The final Plat for each phase shall grant access easements to the public at these locations. 11;05/01 18,02 0406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE Z 009 Phase 1 Preliminary Plat— PUD (Draft 11-05-01) Storm Water As part of the infrastructure plan submittal, 100 year flood elevations shall be computed for the Spring Ditch and the Baxter-Border Ditch, and the limlts of flooding identified. If flooding limits encroach onto proposed lots, this shall be noted on the final plat along with a minimum floor elevation for the structures to be constructed on the lots. The Property Owners' Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all storm water facilities constructed for the project. The applicant shall obtain permission from the appropriate ditch companies to discharge storm runoff into the ditches and for any relocation(s). All ditch easements and setbacks shall be shown on the final plat. The infrastructure plans shall include a detailed grading plan identifying the elevation of all proposed structures. Watercourse setbacks in accordance with Section 16.14.130 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations shall be shown on the final plat. In locations where Baxter Lane is being improved, the various irrigation ditches and stream-ditches shall be either relocated outside of the right-of-way or placed In a pipe. Sewer Provisions for extending sewer mains to adjoining unsubdivided land shall be made in accordance with Section 16.14.100 D of the City Subdivision Regulation's. All proposed manholes need to be made accessible to the city's large flusher truck. The applicant shall submit an all weather access plan with the project infrastructure plans subject to approval by the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. The proposed sewer service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. 11/05/01 18:03 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERLE I�j010 Water The water line in Baxter shall be extended to the west boundary of the Phase 1 Subdivision in accordance with the provisions of Section 16.14.120 F of the City Subdivision Regulations. The water line in Riata Road shall tie into the water line in Baxter Lane to eliminate the dead end main shown on the preliminary plat, The water line in Riate Road near Lot 137 shall be extended to the north to tie into the proposed water line in Ferguson Road. The water system shall be looped and be connected to the existing 12"water line in Deadman's Gulch Road or Catron Street and the existing water line in Oak Street. The proposed water service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. An access road, acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent, shall be constructed to service all on and offsite water improvements. Easements The applicant shall provide easements, in a form acceptable to the city, for all on and off site sewer and water improvements. All water and sewer main easements shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. Easements shall be provided for all offsite drainage facilities. Utility easements shall be granted on the final plat in accordance with the requirements of Section 16,14.050 of the City Subdivision Regulations. The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits for all utilities proposed to be installed in a County right of way. General Plat Issues Prior to filing of the final plat a site plan, complying with the requirements of Section 18.52.030 of the City Zoning Ordinance,for Lots 1 through 27 shall be submitted for review and approval. The sidewalk along the east side of Lot 107 shall be extended to the walk on Baxter Lane. All street names are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 11/05/01 18:03 V406 587 1176 MORRISON MAIERI.E Z011 The lot numbers on the final plat shall utilize a block and lot numbering scheme as required by Section 16.14.030 E. of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. All infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2)public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the plat and in the covenants for the subdivision. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineers 'shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, MPDES etc.) shall be obtained prior to construction of the associated Improvements. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure. lwoo!lal[ail wysiwygl/wmaihnain.6/http://us.f104.mail...c=25&order—dowo&sort--date&posA&box=Inbox Inbox for rdaleb4@yahoo.com Yahoo! -My Yahoo! Options-Sign Out-Help i •. Mail ff@ Addresses 16 Calendar b Note d , WIN', FREE TRAVEL Reply Reply All Forward as attachment (1 Download Attachments Delete Prev I Next I Inbox -Choose Folder- B Move Subject: FW:Comments on Baxter Meadows MaSub PUD Preliminary Plat#P-0128 and Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan#Z-01204 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:37:15 -0700 From: "Carol Schott" I Block Address I Add to Address Book To: rdaleb4@yahoo.com > -----Original Message----- • From: William Kayser > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM > To: Carol Schott > Cc: Mark Tymrak > Subject: Comments on Baxter Meadows MaSub PUD Preliminary Plat > #P-0128 and Zoning PUD Preliminary Plan #Z-01204 > There are several areas of concern to the Department of Public Safety: > 1. Space needs to be provided for a- new- DPS-facility4in or > near the subdivision to insure adequate response time by the > Bozeman Fire Department. > 2. Street lighting: > a. Adequate street lights need to be on all > streets and especially at the intersections to help reduce > the incidence of crime and accidents. > Yard lights are not adequate to provide the lighting needed to > effectively illuminate the streets and > house numbers. > b. In the same vein, there needs to be > standardized lighting for local, arterial and collector streets. > 3. Street widths: > a. Streets need to be wide enough to > accommodate emergency vehicles, taking into account snow > plowing, parking and bike lanes. > 4. Alley width: > a. ( The alley width, between Bozel Street > �and Baxter Lane, needs to be widened to insure that City > , garbage trucks, fire trucks and other > emergency vehicles can navigate even when pl.owed. snow: is� > present. , > 5. Gallatin Green: > a. I"sfands merely pose an obstaclexto >,_�!mergency vehicles in attempting to get to a specific location. 1 of 2 10/29/01 3:36 PM &9!4-gill wysiwygJ/wmailmah6/httpJ/us.f104.maiL..c=25&order own&sort-�ate&pos=O&box=Inbox > b. If, in removing the islands, the streets > are too wide, simply narrow the street and put in pedestrian > curb bulbs. > 6. CCurbi bulbs > a. Create a. conflict with bike Lanes.— When > curb bulbs are in place, there is not adequate room for a bike > lane. This creates a problem with the safe passage of bicycle traffic > on all streets. > 7. Police protection: > a. Again, the increase in the amount of > land annexed into the City and the development of same only > spreads the resources of law enforcement > thinner. Law enforcement services will be provided to the > subdivision on a priority basis with all > other calls for service. > Bill Kayser > Assistant Director of Public Safety > 406-582-2013 > bkayser@bozeman.net Click a 9 to send an instant message to an online friend =Online,(9=Online Delete prey Next Inbox -Choose Folder- Move Reply Reply All Forward as attachment n, Download Attachments Yahoo! Personals -where millions of singles meet. Address Book•Alerts•Auctions•Bill Pay Bookmarks•Briefcase•Broadcast•Calendar•Chat Classifieds Clubs•Companion•Domains Experts-Games•Greetings•Home Pages Invites•Mail•M_M•Member Directory•Messenge W Yahoo! •News•PayDirect•People Search Personals•Photos•Shooing•sports•Stock Quotes•TV•Travel•Weather•)ahooligans Yellow Pages more... Privacy Policy-Terms of Service-Guidelines Copyright 01994-2001 Yahoo!Inc.All rights reserved. 2 of 10/29/01 3:36 PM Yahoo!Mail wysiwygJ/wmailmaial9/httpJ/us.f104.mai...c=25&order=down&sort date&poste&box=Inbox I - *Yahoo! - i n Out-HelInbox for rdaleb4@yahoo-com Yahoo. My Options S q —P Mail n Addresses W Calendar h Notepad o s? Reply Reply All Forward as attachment Download Attachments Delete Prev I Next I Inbox -Choose Folder- Move Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:03:32 -0800 From: "anne banks" I Block Address I Add to Address Book Reply-to: anban@bigsky.net To: billk@mithun.com, cmetzler@baxtermedows.com, rdaleb4@yahoo.com Subject: Baxter Meadows meeting Date: November 7, 2001 To: Bill Kreager, Mithun From: Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Review Committee Re: Baxter Meadows PUD Bill: First, thanks for the opportunity to meet with you and see a more detailed and comprehensive view of Baxter Meadows and the proposed open space, parks and trails. We understand that much of the detail remains to be determined and that negotiations over the 100 acre park acquisition will affect the way in which it is developed. Thanks also for showing us possible designs for the 100 acre park. We were pleased to see the amount of open space, the trail system and connectors, and the proposed underpass under Baxter Lane. We are still concerned, however, that the development is largely dependent on the 100 acre park for active recreation (defined as organized sports requiring playing fields or other specialized facilities) . While the pocket parks within the residential areas are attractive for sitting and visiting, small children's play areas (which should include play equipment) , and visual relief, they do not provide sufficient space for activities like soccer and t-ball practice, tossing footballs and frisbees, and other normal neighborhood play. The linear park might have room enough for a play field or two, but not enough to serve a population of as many as 5, 000. Of course we hope that the 100 acre park will become a reality, but as mentioned, it must serve citizens of the entire Bozeman-Belgrade area as well as Baxter Meadows residents. Thanks again for meeting with us. If there is anything you'd like to discuss further or if you feel this memo does not reflect our I of2 11/13/01 7:08 AM • .-. :ice . _t .. . .._ � r , .. i'..�, .,ss � � .... .. .. ... .f .. Yahoo!Mail wysiwygJ/wmailmain.19/httpJ/us.t104.mai..c=25&order=down&sorr—date&pos=u&box=tnbox discussion • accurately, please let us know. We look forward to seeing more future plans. Anne Banks For the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board cc. Dale Beland Click a��to send an instant message to an online friend =Online,( =Offline Delete Prev I Next I Inbox -Choose Folder- Foye ] Reply Reply All Forward as attachment Download Attachments 9 Yahoo! Personals - where millions of singles meet. b Address Book•Alerts•Auctions•Bill Pay Bookmarks•Briefcase•Broadcast•Calendar•Chat Classifieds•Clubs•Companion•Domains Experts-Games•Greetings•Home Pages Invites•Mail•Maps-Member Directory•Messenger My Yahoo! •News•PayDirect•People Search Personals Photos Shooping•Soorts•Stock Quotes-TV•Travel•Weather•Yahooligans Yellow Pages more... PrivacyP oligy-Terms of Service-Guidelines Copyright 01994-2001 Yahoo!Inc.All rights reserved. 2 of 2 11/13/01 7:08 AM Yahoo!Mail %Aysiwyg:HwmaUmairL6/http://us.fl04.mafl...c=25&order=down&sort--date&poste&box=Inbox Inbox for rdaleb4@yahoo.com Yahoo! -My Yahoo! Options-Sign Out-Help ® Mail ] Addresses Calendar Notepad L GREAT FARES Reply Reply All ! Forward I I as attachment (•� Download Attachments 5eletel 'Next�'ln`box JChoose'Folder ! `Movs Date: Mon,29 Oct 2001 14:41:45 -0800 From: "anne banks" I Block Address I Add to Address Book Reply-to: anban@bigsky.net To: rdaleb4@yahoo.com Subject: Baxter Meadows Phase 1 Date: October 29, 2001 To: R. Dale Beland, planner From: Recreation and Parks Advisory Board subdivision review committee Re: Baxter Meadows Phase I Dale: First, thanks for meeting with us and giving us an overview of the development. As noted in our discussion, the committee has several items of concern: Dependence on the proposed 100 acre regional park for active recreational space. The pocket parks shown in phase I do not provide adequate active space fcr the surrounding high-density housing. A possible future buildout for a population of 5,000 will require more active space within each phase. One possible solution is the donation by the Williams Bros. of a part of the 100 acres as immediately assured active parkland. Lack of adequate design for uses in the proposed open space areas: uses for the pocket parks in Phase I; development of the linear park; trail locations and connections—e.g. no trail is shown in the landscape plan for the linear park although this is an important trail corridor; locations of play fields within phases; wetlands constraints, etc. Lack of trail connections, particularly where the linear park trail crosses Baxter Lane. An underpass has been proposed as a possible solution, but no crossing of any kind is shown in the plans. Dependence on property owner development and maintenance of open space. While this has the advantage to the City of saving money, previous experience has shown that it is difficult to monitor and enforce. If POA maintenance is accepted, contractual arrangements with forfeit of funds for non-compliance should be included. 1 of 2 10/29/01 3:30 PM Yahoo!Mail wysiwygl/wmailmaim6/http:'/us.fl04.mail...c=25&order—down&sort--date&poste&box=lnbox Overall, the committee would like to see more detailed and comprehensive planning for useable parkland within the entire development. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. We look forward to reviewing more concrete plans in the future. Anne Banks for the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Click a to send an instant message to an online friend Q=Online,Q=Offline Reply E Reply AlI N4 ForwarL ; as attachment n Download Attachments Yahoo! Personals -where millions of singles meet. Address Book•Alerts•Auctions•Bill Pa v•Bookmarks•Briefcase•Broadcast•Calendar•Chat•Classifieds•Clubs•Companion•Domains Experts-Games•Greetings•Home Pages•Invftes•Mail•Maps•Member Directory•Messenger•My Yahoo! •News•PayDirect•People Search •Personals•Photos•Shopping•sports•Stock Quotes•TV•Travel•Weather•Yahooligans•Yellow Pages•more... Privacy Policv-Terms of Service-Guidelines Copyright O 1994-2001 Yahoo!Inc.All rights reserved. 2 of 2 10/29/01 3:30 PM MEMORANDUM TO: Whomever It May Concern FROM: Ralph W. Zimmer, Chairperson Bozeman Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee DATE: October 30, 2001 SUBJECT: Baxter Measdows On behalf of the Bozeman Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee, I want to thank you for giving us an opportunity to review the Baxter Meadows proposal. Unfortunately, we were given such a short time to review it that it was impractical to provide committee members sufficient opportunity to do that review. I had hoped to personally give the vehicular and pedestrian transportation components my personal review,buy my vision disability precluded that. Even though I cannot make specific comments about the proposal, let me make some general comments that may or may not be applicable. The Committee has had discussions about street width. The Committee has expressed concern about the City Commission's apparent desire to decrease the width of local streets. The Committee is convinced that such street narrowing, at least from a safety perspective, is misguided and counter-productive. Children run into streets. Drivers open their doors and get out of their vehicles. Drivers walk into the street to get access to the driver's door in preparation for getting into the vehicle. Bicyclists are occasionally present. Regardless of how narrow the street is, vehicles will sometimes be parked directly opposite each other. Extra wide vehicles (school buses, garbage trucks, moving vans, snow plows, and fire trucks) will sometimes be on the street creating, however briefly, a more hazardous situation. When snow is on the ground, some of the street's normal usable width will be consumed by snow storage. A street that is too narrow does not provide an adequate refuge area for children, adults, and bicyclists in or suddenly entering the roadway. While narrower streets can be expected to somewhat slow vehicular traffic and that in fact would increase safety(from that one perspective), that benefit is, in the Committee's collective opinion, more than offset by the detrimental effects mentioned above. We would urge designing and constructing roadways of widths consistent with our standards of recent years, not by any new standards of lesser width. The Committee also would like to see adequate sidewalks on all new streets. These comments may or may not be applicable to Baxter Meadows. If it is, we urge you to accept our recommendations. There are other safety concerns with streets that are narrower than our historical standards but which are not specifically"traffic" issues. These include adequate width to permit fire trucks and other emergency vehicles to get through from both directions and have sufficient "working room" at a site experiencing an emergency. We will leave it up to others to make those points. Again, thank you for giving us this opportunity to review a development proposal. We hope this practice continues, but we do request a longer review time. Bozeman Division 121 East Griffin Drive /,„` 'YV esteni Bozeman, MT59715 ..,.... ������� Telephone: 406-582-4637 wool Enerzv www.northwesternenergy.com Ec CE VET August 29, 2003 S E P - 2 2003 The City of Bozeman Director of Public Works DEPAfZTMENT 06 PLANNING P.O. Box 1230 _l Al`P('P_,i0 11!id{iY DEVELDP(v,ENT Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Attn: Debbie Arkell Dear Debbie: As you are probably aware,NorthWestern Energy has been asked by the developer of Baxter Meadows Subdivision to work with the City of Bozeman to create a Special Improvement Lighting District (SILD) for Phase 1 of Baxter Meadows Subdivision for the purpose of installing streetlights. Enclosed,please find the information on the type and number of poles and fixtures, a lighting layout, as well as preliminary costs. The design for the lighting layout of Phase 1 will most likely continue through future phases. This layout calls for thirty(30) streetlights. They will all be Domus Series lights manufactured by Lumec and will have segmented cut-off optics. There will be three fixture sizes as shown on the layout drawing; seven 175 watt fixtures mounted at 20', nine 100 watt fixtures mounted at 17.5', and fourteen 70 watt fixtures mounted at 17.5'. This is a significant reduction in the number of lights that was originally submitted. At this time, the cost per light is as follows: $41.13 per light per month for the 175 watt fixtures, $38.77 per light per month for the 100 watt fixtures and $37.91 per light per month for the 70 watt fixtures, for a total monthly cost of$1,167.58. A breakdown of these costs is included in this packet and for your information these costs do not include the installation of the concrete bases, trenching or installation of the conduit. It will be the developer's responsibility to provide those items. The cost per month may change from these preliminary figures pending any manufacturer price increase or increase in our PSC Electric Tariff. I have not included our Street Lighting Agreement for Clark's signature at this time pending final approval,but just let me know and I'll provide the Agreement at your request. If the City needs any additional information from NorthWestern Energy at this time, please let me know at your earliest convenience. I'll also send copies of this information to those listed below. Sincere/l��--, . Mel Kotur NorthWestern Energy CC: Robin Sullivan, City Clerk of Commission Dave Skelton, City Planning Dept. Judy Salvas, Moore Law Firm s YARD LIGHT MATERIAL / LABOR COSTS W.O.#: Township Range Section Rate: Legal Description: Premise#: CUSTOMER INFORMATION Name: Baxter Meadows Streetlights Contact: Jerry Williams Service Address: Baxter Meadows Subdivision, Phase 1 Cell Ph: 698.4549 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 81487 Work Ph: 896..4910 CityStateZip: Billings, MT 59108-1487 Number I Ft,Ea,Etc Item# I Description Unit Cost I Total Cost 7 ea 175W MH Ownership Charge 34.77 243.39 Energy 5.29 $37.06 Operations & Maintenance 1.07 $7.49 Monthly total per each light 41.13 $287.91 9 ea 10OW MH Ownership Charge 34.77 $312.93 Energy 2.93 $26.37 Operations& Maintenance 1.07 $9.63 Monthly total per each light 38.77 $348.93 14 ea 70W MH Ownership Charge 34.77 $486.78 Energy 2.07 $28.98 Operations& Maintenance 1.07 $14.98 Monthly total per each light 37.91 $650.74 MONTHLY TOTAL: $1,167.68 Comments: The above monthly costs include the installation of poles&fixtures, energy, and maintenance fees. The above costs do not include the costs of installing the concrete bases, trenching, or installing the conduit from transformers to bases. YLCOSTALS 8/28/2003 sY�» •� sm wo t G" } .y M i s.. >Ly• 1N. !' tea+ r� •'�'' ' •< Z!d. � = ' � ✓ ham' C.4�G•;l H�;��r_ '��� IRZ�• t,t Y y.• t •ttst �s, . } „r. y,r•:��y, �, _,r r "'t,3a1r•3"'n-� ..z ?� OMS50 Luminaire with Segmented Cut-off Optics ��_";sue"Iq�.`o�?'n�:,.�:S;;i'2.a'.-�'�:�'�•`7i,::< ,'. k�%`"�, � ��_ S.t�i!'� �r 1� S F Yl•c� � •1 / '1 ® 1 1 �Y` ��r•��1 4 �z r z �r -: .1 1 1 . .1 '� e.� .tn 4�!IL►ti�l,r�t3`5�..-t'`'�"�=' �r � �`�� ��•!, �TFS4 tr e}. ( cj�'Zx� �li-YlM. 11 1 Vr�,t� aK sty 2, � � I A "'µ ' �`rLai�p,GuideOptical Systems Luminaire Options � %���✓- -rr of ��'s�` �� S LL,p'?,�� 1 '. 1 1 1 .'.I . i•VLv",� [,if•`�.�'i a1 S-l��: 1.� �Liv 1 1 1 1 1. a�'r �. .t n v fat 111 4 y rt O 1. t 1 r t1 7r 4 r go I IA wilawiff . •ah„�.,-t+ hC;.f,,,f?rtr S '• ��AV VI � A ryS, t 1 1 . 1 .1 1. Rv . 3.,ty ,rat'yghki7YT.6Y71l� h73.�f z'ry `: .•• . / _�; \✓ t }i... 4 '-q-e, x 1 ZSt •.1. -.1 1.1 111 59. 7ji4/' i°k`�'' .yy,J•W `#..-tom. ,,� 1 / 1. 1 . 1 �a.umEc•4�s,E x �� � �, ;� • .~��Ph A'`' S`j., s aF Shr'',Fxta�.z "�l.O'Lir•�� 1 1 1 1 /r *. kta,_L,�,�, a 1 DMS50 Luminaire with luminous options - �� 1 r .�,) •F,y”.r Y .q,z-z K�`?mow 'Fit .1 �r��.�c;,.:'E•,�'�tY.�s�„2s'7'��'��-�t��SC a �i ®I, C. ��r t FF�7f� �i����'��ri,h-�Y'ta,��,�y'•mc �ja =,1 t ?��",Ili-w`F'}t.�t^r�{�ri[�'�}`�$ ,�1 �z�' ■.1 ,2 `xis 1✓Pr�! 4�-7: ��✓"-6 '��t�i? Y e, Mi � �` I I ' ,..`tan°' ' ~ .kJr -•�.-��; j���rct� 1 I 1 1 I 1 .1 r,..�lrtt�t.-•+7+4'cC`4�._�'��rwx°. E'4,.�c{�..st.?'�"� Pole OM, PK RK SM FIXTURE TYPE: ARM OM-BKTX (( Guide Suspended Luminaire Mountings OM 24 Specifications: (610 mmi Mounting:features two straight 1 5/8"-O.D.(41 mm)side arms welded to both a 4"-round(102 mm)aluminum pole adaptor and an extruded-aluminum The mounting will accept a luminaire equipped with a 2 1/16"-O.D.(52 mm) J� adaptor(secured by three screws at 120'). The pole adaptor slip-fits 12"1305 mm)into a 4"-round(102 mm)pole or tenon. All mountings are pre-wired for greater installation ease. . (� See page 79 for Finish and Options details. !J 2 3/8- (60 mm, M J� N i` Configurations o -C C--c CIS cic =-c EPA:1.88 sq.ft lA 2 2A 3B M Weight:11.6 lbs.(5.3 kg) P Pole FIXTURE TYPE: POLE S M 6 SM6F-17 BKTX Guide Round Steel Bottleneck Pole Base Details: Specifications: Pole:made from a one-piece,4"-round(102 mm)high-tensile l carbon steel shaft sealed by a rolled and flattened vertical 18 wgid seem.a_nd welded over and in a 6 519--round(168 mm) high-tensile carbon-steel pole base. The assembly is welded to both the top and bottom of a steel base. 4- A 4-by 9"1102 by 229 mm)maintenance opening,complete 14.88 m' _ I 1102 mm) with cover and copper ground lug,is centered 21"(533 mm) from the bottom of the anchor plate. 14.57 m1 ; E Joint cover:made from two pieces of cast aluminum _ 14' i ,E ( mechanically fastened to the junction with stainless steel screws. Base cover:made from two pieces of cast aluminum mechanically fastened to the base with stainless steel t7 screws. 13.66 mi- - i Finish:"Hot Dip` chemical etching preparation. Lumital polyester powder coat textured finish. a E Available in 16 standard colors. Durable UV-resistant exterior finish as pei#ASTM G7 and -- - 13.05 rn1-� m outstanding salt-spray resistance according to#ASTM D2247 n � testing procedures. s Options: r. DE: Pole base buried 5'(1524 mm)in the ground i.ad ml (see details on page 83) wireway LS: Provision for loudspeaker outlet ' 61/8-1156mm) PH7. Button-type photoelectric cell Ispecify operating voltage) PH8: Quarter-turn type photoelectric cell (specify operating voltage) PH9: Shorting cap for single phase only I DR: Duplex receptacle(120V line volt.only) Bolt circle GFI: DR with common round fault interrupter 1261 mml ---------- -- ----- n 1 1/2' (120V line voltage only) p C.� BASXX: One single banner arm BABSXX: One single break-away banner arm BADXX: One double banner arm a (330 mm) BABDXX: One.double break-away banner arm m = Note:EPA recommendations are calculated according to 9 E _ Comes with 4 anchor bolts, AASHTO standards and include a 30%gust factor,with a 50-lb. 8 nuts and washers. (22.7 kg)load applied]ft.(305 mm)above the center of the pole. - - The maximum EPA rating shown is 30.0 sq.ft.Some poles may t L� 16- B.C.from:8 3/4"to 11 1/8"(222 to 283 mm) 1406 mm) exceed this rating. Ordering Information Catalogue Nominal Section Wall Weight EPA rating Base Bolt Anchor number height thickness 70mph 80mph 100mph size circle bolts z ft. m in. mm in. mm lbs. kg ft.' ft.' ft.' in. mm in. mm in. mm SM6F-8 8 2.44 4 102 0.120 3.2 85 39 30.0 30.0 20.8 13 330.. 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6N-8 8 2.44 4 102 0.188 4.8 99 45 30.0 30.0 30.0 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6F-10 10 3.05 4 102 0.120 3.2 95 43 30.0 23.5 15.2 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6N-10 10 3.05 4 102 0.188 4.8 115 52 30.0 30.0 22.5 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6F-12 12 3.66 4 102 0.120 3.2 105 48 23.6 18.3 11.6 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 t. SM6N-12 12 3.66 4 102 0.188 4.8 180 59 30.0 27.3 17.5 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4.20 19-508 SM6F-14 14 4.27 4 i02 0.120 3.2 115 52 15.5 11.8 7.3 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6N-14 14 4.27 4 102 0.1.88 4.8 145 65 23.2 18.0 11.3 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6F-15 15 4.57 4 102 0.120 3.2 120 54 14.0 10.5 6.4 13 330 10 1/2 '267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6N-15 15 4.57 4 102 0.188 4.8 153 69 20.7 15.4 9.7 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6V-15 15 4.57 4 102 0.250 6.4 182 83 25.4 19.4 12.0 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6F 15 16 4.88 4 t02 0.120 3.2 125 57 12.4 9.0 5.5 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6N-16 16 4.88 4 102 0.188 4.8 161 73 17.6 13.0 8.0 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SM6V-16 16 4.88 4 102 0.250 6.4 192 87 22.0 16.6 10.3 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-20 19-508 SMBF-18(I Ik-p�5.49 4 102 0.120 3.2 135 61 9.0 6.5 3.7 13 330 10112 267 3/4-27 19-686 SM6N-18 18 5.49 4 102 0.188 4.8 176 80 13.2 9.8 5.5 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-27 19-686 :day SM6V-18 18 5.49 4 102 0.250 6.4 212 96 16.5 12.4 7.4 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4.27 19-686 SM6F-20 20 6.10 4 102 0.120 3.2 145 66 6.6 4.6 2.3 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-27 19-686 SM6N-20 20 6.10 4 102 0.188 4.8 191 87 9.9 7.1 4.0 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-27 19-686 SM6V-20 20 6.10 4 132 0.250 6.4 232 105 12.9 9.3 5.3 13 330 10 1/2 267 3/4-27 19-686 Other pole thicknesses are available for use with banner arms.Consult factory. 4_99 Lumec neither designs nor makes recommendations as to the dwjjw of concrete bases. =S Note:Lumec reserves the right to modify the above details to reflect cha 'the cost of materials and/o;production and/or design without prior no.. 17 P H 7, PH8, PH9, DR, LS PH8 Pole on Straight and Fluted Poles Guide PH8 Specifications: ��=_� The PH8 twistlock photoelectric cell.is designed for pole-top installation Photoelectric Cell and comes pre-wired on the pole-top cap. 3 Working from individual project specifications,Lumec will determine the PH9 exact position and type of photoelectric cell. Photoelectric cells can be installed on all types of straight or fluted aluminum Shorting Cap _ or steel poles. When the PH9 option is ordered,a shorting cap is supplied on the photoelectric �--� cell receptacle.The shorting cap permits servicing by cutting power to the luminaire. 'I l; Shown here on a fluted pole. � i r i r !i ce ' .P.9 5-5 PO Box 490 1 = -6.2':1� No-orthWesteni 12605 -1 AUG 29 20G Energy Bozeman, MT 59771-0490 ' 9 6 2 6 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 5 9 7 1 5 FIRST CLASS MAIL Dave Skelton, City Planning Department The City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 '' I �I y � /F R TCLASS MAIL r I I r � . 4 i Form No. 0492 JAL A& f'i n , 0 et rJ I_ ----=-- - ----- ------------ ------------- -------------------------- ---- - -------- =- ---- -- —- —— ——7—+-- p. F -- -- ---------------'-------- ------------------------------ - ------r_ - ------ �----. r� -- ----- ---�-- ----- ----- 4 i�, 1482bs ALU pC�'= i 4 LJ� � I I m O W X PHA SE 3 � �® II I UD —_ --_----- , P , ASE 2B Ll I E0 -- _ _ ► .1 � 1 1 1 , I I 1 —� ;- - PHASE 1 I I 11� 1 !, -- ' Ir 1 ' I 1 1 I 11 I I I , � �_�� FFT 620 I [_�L_�J ' -------- -- Ll_L1L�_ '- , '.:,: � I .:. � __ - - •. -- mac ooc 7__7 — anEcts _ 6 _ u' FT_L�LJ_- -_��J_� I I I I _-1 d d - III , f- _� - T - - - Q_[I]_ -[Z]=D I __[L�_0 07 1 I Jim — a \MMMMTRAKKERI � i l i BUILDING ! o � ZONINGBP ` \\ i o PHASE 5 I U SET. PROJECT N0. 0201 \� I DRAWN BY. _ CHECKED BY: I DATES PRE: 275D3 I 1 1 CRs:.211M3 p Ec —� cus: AUG 2 2 2003 �. REV. REV: , 1 D FR4T6 EMT OF PL NP SG INDY L07F:�NT SHEI 1` ,48TQR PL,4N /"� „ . ©, . .-I-I I-�,;[I.i.-.,-II�... .,:�I.�...I�a�,.��..,.��.f.....�� .I.I I...�,f;I..���.I.,.I..!�,I.1,1,-.,%:.-I.I�.,-:I.,.I."�..I -.. r.. , Q ©. ,. :. . , . :. ,,�:i,-.-r.:,i�'-�I,,-I I�..�.�,-p—:.`'".,.,...I-viL��,�..'.-.,;..,,�'!�I`,,.�,`'--,,..I`-�..`,,.1"�'4.1,:1,"1:�:-'.�1:.:I�:�-,k","�..�,.”1,,-��'"..,,�,-�l..�1.�:�1,I-,�.,I,,4 . n ,,. I ,. . --. R d 4 - �•: t: .. _ .I -. -r .. -,.,. r�i. ,:. . :. .: 0 �'S f _ . .. . - _ .. .:. - : - i,'o . -r ._. __ * rl I,titi'1.1482 r'dViu t' qe\ C. 1. - 11 O,.pp t - I - .. 1 I I \a' I- - ':. —:_ - Iy - , I r x . __ . ANC -, . . r ! 1. -I'. _ - i . . --. I I r I I �"'' °_'i i I i _ — -' .. : "" —.,, I j/ I i' _. I is i i DEVEL 1'EADOIIIS — — — — — -ra i ii 1 i I-----j I % -'--- {----------7--------- r — — ——— — — — —— — — —— — —————— — — Q `! i :" /- ; - f I -- - 28'REAR SETBACK ' W ,. j i i 1 �t--'--7 p i ® ZZU r I R IIII1 -I.1��,-"�I-'i,�%�,"<I-�-)" -- - -- --i----- ----- TI�cT i i -- - - -a- I , �.; $ .k i i I-=----� ; . ------ i -----' o i ` i ! j i 4 PR.O R Y LINE i Di mow. R I // � `- 1 ./k—_—._._- 1 1600' 23 rM 1421 AS RESIDENTIAL ' .. ` � '` /.. i __ - I ARTIFICIAL i W I i , 't -. • ..( ?,.1 _ / I - I LOT LION I I - ,�/� I., \ '. l� . - I- I I I: 133'-4- 19'-0° 21'-0" IS'-0'12' 42'-11 12'- ' 91'-0' ;, ' 66I-0" 12 0" -.'X \ � i ----- j- .. 1--'--- —L___-_._ --,y.. _.BA)Ci R MEADOWSj DIANNE PETER90N ,! .. _, -.. . - :. - _... - i J i DEVEI(OPMENT - I WILLIAM R:PETER90P1 I - I - - .. g . lI It I . I. I 1 I AS RESIDENTIAL , V^ i i ♦ • • m p .: " E.AXI-ER LANE s — i — ;1 a 4 ., ems,: � TRACT¢ - i r n I — A� _ . _ 161'-0' I _ <' LL k�*,..:P% i - I - 194 Fa't 1TED PSARTNER3F�P \J , I R� x • I . — KNOW REMOVAL a s . _ _ R-3 RESIDENTIAL I BTORAC+E 1 /�¢�/ vsY'£ 5 K'»}.^ titt�3 . I ', '� 11 I g - s tJ + ----- ---------------------i---------------_ - ;"} _ . I _ 1 '. ^ x TRACT 3 I IB , 3 ry;(. 13AXTER MEADOWS I 9a' F ' , ` - _ . . I DEVELOPMENT I ` I. ": . I I I — E Q9 - na mes''�"*.cs rrt Zr ''. ,I . I - - 1 ..uarrmn w uox a wmrmu 4 -}> ilk rnr a nw.ao otsxrl , . S 5 Y BI1ED 7• 14 �... - _ - � -k;-;h i�i,iI\.",I, —tI. _ . 1 ,- F ,;4. 1 f f my. I I� ♦ 1 `z•.:.: .: I —17— TRAM 4 SE 1/4 BEG.G,O.B.NO 2202 tt BOZEMAIN MGNTANA,C6"ATIN COLT Y I I Ib®0I X 680' 1001,100 BF f242159 AW 3 I I 11 I +1 6: [ ! .• � fi :r: tf 1 :I.:.:: .I,, $:., :i Slfi �,N [� =' i�L :I:;:, IE .140 11 1 1 �. 0 OAK STREET ?i .. �W-4 . i a..r . . REQUIRED PARKING I 25'BIDE SETBACK : _ (� . - IGROSS 9F 859.NET SF PAIJCttJa SPACES m. I OFFICE 6,861 9F 6831 SF 23 I� ARTIFICIAL LOT UA-IOLE SITE Q r�j,jy Z WAREHOUSE 8,813 8F 1,491 SF 1 m PERCENQtAO STCOVERAGE Sg,%3 4F. 6 01,950 SG1FT- s VJ._RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE 10,911 SF 9,214 SF 31 NET DWELLING WIT DENSITY 332 WITS/ACRE 25 WITS/ACRE I ' _�, .PERCENT CF OPEN SPACE 21% 94A _TOTAL SPACES 61 SPACES I MJMBER OF DWELLING WITS I . _ - - ALLOWED REDUCTION 60 SPACES ; ' I ,- PAPoGING PROVIDED I I TOTAL PARKING SPACES 66 I w: . TOTAL HC PARKING SPACES 3(1 VAN ACCESSIBLE) /� . TOTAL LOADIWa SPACES 1 - I . ' ,W ■Z: L ----- — - - — — �33 FRGt 1T SETBArJG - -- --- —I. N r MM I W-'^ , . ,UTILITY EASEMENT - ; l-- ------ - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - SE,r. ---- - --- ��+11 I PROJECT fd201 . ® © ® AI - - DRAWN BY Fr•R•l EDGE OF EXISTING PAVl7`1ENT Cktkl):r biY •!♦C BARTER LANE CI00'RO.WJ rh ATE VJ PRE 221m9 - O ; I3 ° 9®-0• ~ REVt a .. 161'-0' I - - /� �: REV•�-3 �, o W- ® , P sH ET tz ROOF TOP'SCREENIN<�` ENL,4fRGED SITE i=L/4N � � �t� 11 a,0 0" i" 4m'-0' Al1Gl - 2 20(�3 „a p KEPI°r-+'�,PLANNING ... ^.. ;. ,: T. � , ' I Jill U I I NN U � W II F-- IIMZO. F/off/7Z 10m I C I I 810 W �� it I I .LL II I I L L`• I I I . . �NESf DOCUNCNR.Mf.U PfsOx - I I( V .ancrtcs+NfSf cxuxfine,wc an"am l or mureoarnc . I tx pN1ECT f SK Oifwtm.. . \ ( v.i'�nw�maur PNe[ii0°mrss `' k mxsurt a•coureow,mf ofv x�^^on .nexrccis ro fm�cnr snaNrenm II I M Aa Him r , I ETC L 1 e II —,L t $� II I z z Q� I r I Ii Wz �- - --------- - -------------------------- ----- - - ---- --------------- ------ - �-- --�-�" ----- - - --------- -�---------------------------------------- ---_-_------------ ----�-- ------------------------- ---- ----- SET:. I PROJECT NO. 0201- \ \ ( I DRAWN BY. \ t LEGEND � TOTAL AAA PHASE I-bbS4 ACMES \ � �� CHECKED BY: SYMBOL LOCATION TOTAL TYPE CATALOG ARM HEADS HEKG"T CONria SPACMG \ \ ' DATE' LAMP FIXT. LENSE AR9 POLE/HT. FIN. \' \ 1 PRE: LIbID3 GOA BARTER LANE 21 PI 115-MH-DM550-5W-V-CMIA-5M6F-20-15KTX 2' 1 20, STAGGERED 110' \ \ �JB FERGUSON Imo.EQUESTRIAN WAY 52 PI 100-MH-pM850-8C3-V-OMIA-BM6F-I0-&CTX 2' I I'15' STAGGERED ffi' \ CDS: �C LATIGO AVE,BOZAL BT,RIATA RD. 44 PI 10-MH-DM850-SGI-V-CKA-5M&F-18-DKTX 2' 1 IT5' 5TAC<.ERED 110, - - DELGIAN GT,CLYDESDALE CT,FJORD CT. \ \ \ REV: s, D GALLATIN GLEN BLVD. 15 PI 10-MN-PM850-SGI-Y-OMIA-SMbF-18-EIChC 2' 1 115 ONE 51DED 84' - N REV: 5 Al1Ci®9 ' p L ����U � SHEET- _ SITS LIGHTING FL>4N �' AUG'2 2 2003 � DCP1°�M1iFM1I OF PLANNING /Cl/ t A Baxter Meadows Phase 1 Exhibit "C" Street Sections Revision November 14, 2001. p, d gyp' ° d - d° ° " '4j�5a ' °4• 6 d tldm°j°d a a o 0 10'-0' 22'-6' 8'-0' 11'-0' 11'-0' B.-O. A 221-61 S 0 Z 8 EtKrJ BOULEVARD 6' PARKDIG DRIV[ T BWWT DAM PARKING 6' EOULrYARD GIO[- OlDGWALK WALK A. BAXTER LANE (105 ft R.O.W. Minor Arterial) (VARIANCE) d 6 aqb dam° a o 7-0. 1 10'-0 12'-6' 8'-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' 8'-0' 12'-6' 5-0' 6'-0' BIKE/ PLANTER 6' PARKING DRIVE 1•_� DRIVE PARKING 6' PLANTER SIDE- SIDEWALK WALK B. FERGUSON AVENUE (90 ft R:O.W.) (VARIANCE) O C7 On (� °C9 G> O 4 4 5t Q 1 1 5-0' L T-6' T-0' L W-0' 9'-0' T-0' T-6' �• O. SIDE PLANTER 6• PARKING DRIVE DRIVE PARKING 6' PLANTER SIDE WALK -WALK C. EQUESTRAIN LANE (60 ft R.O.W.) p O oC 4 ° 4 5'-0. 14'-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' 14'-0' 5'-0' SIDE- PLANTER DRIVE DRIVE PLANTER SIDE- 1 -� WALK WALK D. EQUESTRIAN LANE (60 ft R.O.W.) 0 � Z3 d dam° p 4 4� n t 20'-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' w-0' 10'-0' OPEN DRIVE DRIVE PLANTER 5' MEANDERING SPACE/DITCH SIDEWALK E . RIATA ROAD (60 ft R.O.W) oa po a a n a a �Jp V"'9 p� d °go 6� ¢ a 4 v 4� fl s� GREEN o 12'-0' 10'-6' 12'-0' 7'-0' T-6' S'-0' GREEN 6' DRIVE PARKING 6'PLANTER SIDE- 1'-0' WALK � . GALLATIN GREEN (56 ft R.O.W. EACH SIDE OF GREEN) e�, a a 4 4 Q f 5'-0' T-6' T-0' 16'-0' T-0' T-6' 5'-0' 2'-0' SIDE- PLANTER PARKING DRIVE PARKING 6'PLANTER SIDE- 2'-0' WALK WALK G. LATIGO AVENUE & BOZEL STREET (60 ft R.O.W.) . (VARIANCE) 0 GARAGE GARAGE SFTRACR'-0'� 20'-0' I_�2'-O' SETBAGK PAVED H . ALLEY (20 ft R.O.W.) o � ° a d°czp CJ °C °�B6 dam° Q � = 10'-0' 10'-0' 8'-0' ` 1� 0'-0'_L�50 1 0, PARK 6 DRIVE DRIVE PARKING 6 PLANTER SIDE- WALK I . BAXTER PARKWAY (60 ft R.O.W.) 0 o c 0 VC9 Pfl� a 4 4 4 Q �_M=I MV m 3'-6' L L 5'-0' L 7'-6' 10'-0' l 10'-0' ` 7'-0' 1� 7'-6' L 5'-0' 3'-6' SIDE- PLANTER 6' DRIVE DRIVE PARKING 6' PLANTER SIDE- WALK WALK 2'-0' J. ARABIAN COURT (60 ft R.O.W.) 10 ft APPALOOSA COURT (60 ft R.O.W.) BELGIAN COURT (60 ft R.O.W.) CYDESDALE COURT (60 ft R.O.W.) FJORD COURT (60 ft R.O.W.) . • E 24'-6' 14'-6' 27-0' 5'-0' 10'-0. 10'-0' 5-0' 8'-0' 34'-0' 6'BIKE DRIVE 1'.0' DRIVE BIKE GRAVEL SHOULDER DAVIS ROAD SOUTH OF BAXTER INITIAL (100 ft R.O.W.) INITIAL (100 ft R.O.W.) kli4, � .06 • 5-0' 1G'-0' 8'-0' 5'-0' 11'-0' l 11'-0' 15'-0'I S.-0' 1 10'-0' 5'-0' ■1-0' SIDEWALK PLANTER 6 PARKING DIKE DRIVE DRIVE BIKE PARKING 6' PLANTER SIDEWALK 1'-0'STRIPE 0• DAVIS ROAD SOUTH OF BAXTER FUTURE (100 ft R.O.W.) 21'-0' A 5'-0'I 10'-0' << 10'-0' 15.50. 8'-0' 40'-0' $'EIKE DRIVE 1'-0' DRIVE BIKE GRAVEL SHOULDER DAVIS ROAD NORTH OF BAXTER INITIAL 1100 ft R.O.W.) ° •4. a a 'p° ° O Q 4 D 9 O Q 14'-6- U T-0' 15'-0'1 11'-0- 16'-0'16'-0' 1 11'-0' j 5'-0.1 7'-0' 11 14'-6' 5'-0'u 1'-0'SIDEWALK PLANTER 6'PARKING DIKE DRIVE TURN DRIVE ' BIKE PARKING 6' PLANTER SIDEWALK LANE DAVIS ROAD NORTH OF BAXTER FUTURE 1100 ft R.O.W.) (VARIANCE) � a e 6'-0' 10'-0' '-8' 8'-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' 8'-0' 24'-0' BIKE/ PLANTER 6• PARKING DRIVE 1•_0• DRIVE GRAVEL SIDEWALK 9HOULDER DEADMANS GULTCH ROAD INITIAL (90 ft R.O.W.) A °e8o d6j0 4 0 6'-0' 10'-0' 12'4' 8'-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' 8'-0' 12'-6' S'-0' 6'-0' BIKE/ FLANTER 6• PARKING DRIVE 1•_0• DRIVE PARKING 6' PLANTER SIDE- SIDEWALK WALK DEADMANS GULTCH ROAD FUTURE (90 ft R.O.W.) (VARIANCE) Yahoo!Mail wysiwygJ/wmailmain.6/httpJ/us.f104.mai1...7&order—down&sort=date&pos=0&ViewAttach=l FROM:Jody Sanford,AssociVPlanner CC: Bob Murray,Project Engineer James Nickelson,Engineering Consultant RE: Baxter Meadows Subdivision Preliminary Plat—Street Standard for Baxter Lane DATE: 19 November 2001 Planning staff of the Department of Planning and Community Development have found a_potential.conflict ibetween the recently.adopted Bozeman.2020_Community Plan (which:was-adopted-on-10=22=01)-and the (street section proposed in__the_above-referenced-project_(submitted-on:__10-23-01)' for Baxter Lane. Specifically,the Baxter Meadows Subdivision preliminary plat application proposes a street section with an off-street 5-foot wide sidewalk and an on-street 5-f6ot wide bike lane. However, Figure 9-1 of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan (Bozeman Parks, Existing Trails and Proposed Future Trail Corridors) calls for an 8-to 10-foot boulevard trail in lieu of a standard sidewalk and a bike lane along Baxter Lane. This issue needs to be resolved because the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan states that if there is a conflict between the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan and the Transportation plan "the.policies,ofthe f2020,Community Plan will supersede the other plan." The Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update, which was adopted on 10-22-01, designates Baxter Lane as a Minor Arterial (see Figure 11-7)which would require a dedication of 100 feet of right-of-way. Accordingly, the developer of the Baxter Meadows subdivision proposes to dedicate the full 100 feet of right-of-way where they own land on both sides of Baxter Lane and one-half of the. 100 foot right-of-way(50 feet)where they own land only on the north side of Baxter Lane.At this time,Baxter Lane is proposed to be developed as a two-lane Minor Arterial. The Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Year 2001 Update also contains Recommended Minor Arterial Street Standards (see Figure 11-3). There are four options depicted 1) 2 lanes, 2) 3 lanes, 3) maximum roadway section — 5 lanes, and 4) maximum roadway section — 5 lanes. The 2 lane option depicts an off-street 5-foot wide sidewalk and an on-street 5-foot wide bike lane. The maximum roadway section—5 lane option depicts a 10-foot wide pedestrian/bike trail in lieu of a 5-foot wide sidewalk and a 5-foot wide bike lane..The diagrams have been interpreted as meaning that if a two lane option road is proposed, then a 5-foot wide sidewalk and a 5-foot wide bike lane must be installed. Similarly, if the maximum roadway section— 5 lanes option is proposed, then a 10-foot boulevard trail must be installed. The Department of Planning and Community Development's staff feel that this interpretation of the diagrams in Figure 11-3 is too rigid. Instead, the features of these different options can be mixed and matched. In Planning.Stafrs opinion,the 10-foot boulevard trail could be substituted for a 5-foot sidewalk; 4and a 5-foot bike.lane in the.two lane option::The.Bozeman,Planning Board supported the�inclusion,of a tbike.lane,along.Baxter-Lane,-but may:.not.have.realized-that installing a boulevard,.trail-,instead was=an joption i d'here.is,an apparent.conflict within the Transportation.Plan that.further complicates this--issue. The Bozeman Parks, Existing Trails and Proposed Future Trail Corridors map that was adopted as part of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan is also included in the Transportation Plan as Figure 6-5 (Bozeman Area Trail Network). Some of the roads that are planned to have boulevard trails on this map are also planned to have bike lanes according to Figure 6-3 (Bike Route Network) in the Transportation Plan. Planning staff and the Transportation Plan consultant (Robert Peccia and Associates) were aware of this conflict before 2 of3 11/19/01 5:25 PM :� r � ' 1 I � r .r. ..._ . .. .. .. �. 1 , 1 • Yahoo!Mail wysiwygJ/wmailmain.6/httpJ/us.f104.maf...7&orderdown&sort--date&poste&ViewAttach=l L . A ! ` the document was complete*' ut_decided to leave it as is.Decisions bout whether a.particular road would have a boulevard trail or a sidewalk/bike lane would-be.made on a case by case:basis. It would be easy to install a boulevard trail along Baxter Lane because most development along its course would be greenfield development. However, it might be hard to install boulevard trails on streets that pass through urbanized area (such as W. Babcock and W. Durston). Standard sidewalks and bike lanes might work better for these streets. It is difficult to say which option jboulevard trail verses sidewalk/bike 1 would be best for Baxter Lane. Both options have pros and cons. Boulevard Urals would likely serve a wider range of users—bike commuters, recreational cyclists, rollerbladers, skate-boarders, parents with strollers, walkers and small children on bikes —while bike lanes are largely for bike commuters. However, boulevard trails might be more difficult to maintain. Standard snow plows and street cleaning equipment could be used to maintain bike lanes, and special equipment might be needed to maintain boulevard trails. If the decision is made to install a sidewalk and a bike lane,the developer should make sure that boulevard trees are planted in a way that a boulevard trail could be installed in the future to replace the sidewalk and bike lane.(Whatever decision is made for the Baxter Meadows Subdivision will likely dictate the street standards that will_be `applied to all other-land that develops along-Baxter Lane. Back to Message Yahoo! Personals -where millions of singles meet. Q Address Book Alerts Auctions Bill Pay•Bookmarks•Briefcase Broadcast•Calendar•Chat Classifieds Clubs Companion•Domains Everts-Games•Greetings•Home Pages•Invites-Mail•Maps-Member Directory•Messenger My Yahoo! -News•PayDirect•People Search Personals•Photos•Shopping-Sports•Stock Quotes•TV•Travel Weather Yahooligans Yellow Pages more... Privacy Policy-Terms of Service-Guidelines Copyright 01994-2001 Yahoo!Inc.All rights reserved. 3 of 11/19/01 5:25 PM 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS/MEETINGS FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL AND A PUD MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given of public hearings/meetings to be held before the BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on Tuesday, October 30, 2001, at 9:00 a.m.; before the.DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, October 30, 2001., at 3:00 p.m.; before the PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday,November 6,2001, at 7:00 p.m.; and before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, November 19, 200.1, at 7:00 p.m. All public hearings/mectings will be held in the Commission l Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public hearings is to consider a request for approval of a preliminary plan for the Phase I planned unit development of the Baxter Meadows project, and a request for approval of a major subdivision preliminary plat, as proposed by the property owner, WBC LP, 1035 Cerise Road, Billings, MT 591.01. The subject property. is 460.2971 acres described as that part of the southwest quarter and all of the southeast quarter of Section 34, Township I South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., anti the northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. Gallatin County, Montana. A more detailed legal description and map is available at the City Planning & Community Development Department. The property is generally bounded on the east by Davis Lane, on the south by future Oak Street, on the west by Harper Puckett Road, and on the north by future Deadman's Gulch. The proposed Phase I PUD preliminary plan consists of a 65-acre mixed-use development to include up to 156 residential dwelling units and related open space, commercial and office uses. The proposed preliminary plat defines the lots and blocks to accommodate the .Phase I development. In addition', generalized design guidelines for future phases of the project vvill be considereds Public testimony will be taken at the public hearings. Written comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Planning & Commmvty Development Department Office, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Data pertaining to the application may be reviewed in the Planning & Community Development Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2360. For.those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Baxter Meadows Baxter Meadows Phase I PUD/MS notice 10/14/01 tl n a CU tl _ x 114 — /t5 R-3 n i n RI U nrn 1. Usno City of Bozeman. _ Department of Planning and Community Development - U. S. POSTA6F 'Z Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Streetcii N $00.329 ° ._ ! `•` s P.O. Box 1230 ec �� Bozeman,MT 59771-1230 , -59 S. Co #� 5:-Ul Phone: NOV 05 2001 003Z2 026893 Address Service Requested q LLIIFP0594848 JNB09 0038C63 r` McDonald Land Partnership 100 Park Avenue West i • �� pt. 2067 enver, CO 80205-3276 t11../•• {,.ii l 40 BAXTER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION- PHASE I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SE 114, SW 114 OF SECTION 34, TIS R5E, P.M.,M. NE 114 OF SECTION 3, T2S R5E, P.M.,M. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 1/2 INT UICHAEL 0.COX KATHLEEN R.COX 1/2 IH7 JOHN M.COX BARBARA N.COK TRACT A-5 COS 664A UNPLATTED N 1/2. George E.WeaUO4e NW 1/4, SW 1/4 KOy Wes Hate Narlinen ' COS NO.233 110 fm 2217 Klagma Dmry Parmermlp LOT IA 117 fm 2776 MINOR SUB.NO.145A Robert Cene Do:a 161 fm 532C —— — — — 1322.58 2646.72 Son on L.L.C. 160 fm 1551 m I ROnold D.AOledl es MOry K.Aaledl 6 IM 910-912.959 ' 1322.63 Larry D.KblYpalrics 460.298 ACRES(TOTAL) Karen S.Lane 179 fm 3009.3511,]BI] on-N.Been �i �b I GJ�G N Jmu u.Dem 9 rm 319 l` 1\ n cl 1 I O 16 F.2637C mi 5� O QDane R n � BBenK..Rogns 6 fm 911,959 LZL • NOT01'24`W aOnne Pel�iOn 2.51 249.02t xviom R.Pelosm 6 58ff5 77 F.961 DMOTHY W.AND LEESA PROLE o 54 190.05 BARTER LANE BAXTER LANE ANDERSON 2026536 1 Bruce 4B-206 TEng 96 fm 4674 UNPLATTED Vesta fern Anderson Me,COlnerine Net— • Marie C.Bo.ler H Ll le E.I.I. 74-534 i 2 fm 1014 dac. H b N \\ UNPLATTED K L Limiled [1 pprtne'O;p 94-61 154 fm 749-751 COS NO.1302(REM.) 0eu91a1 Lance Smiln • 142 Tm 69 4 2636.25 ^ - SWLNSON UrmLA1Rd N\aN f 74 646 UNPLATTED Joan L<.ia 1/2 p c TR I A WJllam H. d Belly McDonald land dsn'E COS NO.2007 Anne Sipple Trasl Company limited p I53 fm 775 ParinerMUP 1/2 o C ]2 fm 4365 (EXHEBIT-THIS PAGE) BAXTER MEADOWS PHASE I SUBDIVISION ZONING P.U.D. STAFF REPORT 721 w r .� _. .,. r .. ..: _ .. .. .. : - ,� 11 ,�, -, .: .. - ; _ .. .. .; ... ::. : .. .. x6. �` - .� - 1. ,. .,. .: - 1 .. .,. -.-.: ., . - _. .. :. .`` r _ _ I I .. _ — , , .. - - ". — 1. G . - , .. 1. 1 t I I .. t � j, _ l w, � . . r.., . '�NI I'll I ._ :. -� , 1;.. .. /-\L 1 .. Y 117 l i �, LJ..I '.: '+ i .- �, .-.'(' ,. i A,,! l �. . A I II a I II . ; q . �" ,� ( � i. Il . . $ �� R I I �� 4�✓" r.' :. - :-,' , — _. .. . . . . LI�:WiLI %/�/ I — — — Y �N ✓J . i i', v , .'.; :: .. �'i .�; - II , .ti ,.� a .�i, . .. T k " ^� / I. . I - I . . .,.. , - �JIL � -,� , I I " �, I I t i II . . . -If I . �� �� ' l . L LJ __ . it r ' ..� I . ------.------ �s�•- ( -jam I N— . . �: W I _ II.-------------------- ,L -, �� ig_�_ Ma_ - - >- I I I �'�: ` _ I „-- �..�4- /. 1 —� nWTf�Mh OUi Mf'EYPRES wRlllEll . / — 1 —_ � t , - o _ ". ViEC:S 6 SmiORvvftJ rtEp o 0 , -- -- . - L -._`--_ -.-----.-----' I I ,ti-w,+�o _ �_� o - _ . . e I_.. 9 � - Ili I rt I _-' - I - __ : (, _ t'- -1- ll J L J I I -- .:, - I - -- - Ltd � r - � r - �V I � i� l } � - f -1 -_ p� I a I I _ ; , . _ =� �� _ <- IF -I I I I < 1 i_T�- _7 ,I�t�ff, (� -� I ,,� �. .1 I - �3a tt i _1�' - , - rt - I II W : & I - T _ I f -- -+ 4 fz - a �,_;�_ r t' I W �. ) , - ---r — :�z + OA.�,- - 1, I i �j' 1 �u I .a d 1. , II 1 lz �;-IT I Q N LL _ _ E , _ W _ o . N I - ------ ------ -------- - -- - -_---- ---- -- --- ------ --- -- -- -- --------- _ - a. ALL w CID: : - + -rz 3-- -� -- - -- - -_ -__--- _ =--- ------------ ------------------------ — --------- --- -- -------- --------------a -- ---- ----- — — — SET :. .I - _: \. .�. I DRAWN BY: .1 .. - r:, \ f.. .. - CHECKED BY: m LEGEND TOTAL AfA PHASE I-6654 AGREE - . . . I • ... - SYMBOL ,LOCATION TOTAL. TYPE CATALOd AMI HEADS HEIGHT CGNFIG. SPACNG - f ..` ...: I r .. .. - . . - :.,. :. � ., I -. .I MR I - I I 7 .I . d . . .. —��., - T "... \ '.� , , t, , ,. .. - �• LAMP PIXL LENSE AIb1-POLE/HL FIN.- ..- - -;:: ..I t: - -1 - : p® i.Ib,i 1... g� : \ . � ` ." -•' - ' OOA MAXTOR LANs: i, - -]I '.P1 I'f5-MN-DMS40-SGS-V-OMIA-SM6F-20-BKTX T I - 70' STAG D 110' - - ... - - .. - . \, .. M._ CRS:, 5. 1. . .. _ I..` �-�\ - v �� -FERGUSON FRO.EMSOIRIA14 WAY -57 PI IOO MH DM85O SG3 V OMIA SMbF IS BKTX 2 I Il8 STAGGERED W2 �. ' ,.:, '.:'� -,: .� ,...-_ V .. . 1,:•... ' . - LATIGO A 60t4L Br ATA Fid. - - '. 150J3 j 4. <,�:'.., ,.- - : 44 ,. Plt..' IO-MN-DM89O-SCsI-V-GMIA-SM6F-I8-CKTX 4! 'i. .' - - I'13' 9tAGCxEI D IIO''.. .. - . BELGIAN.Ci:CL7fJESDALE.CT.PJORD'.CL -. , :., .. �G1 1. . ' ':.. .:•:,:.-. 7 .: .... - "CJD: GALLATINc#I;ETISLVD.1 -. -P1.- Y®-MN-DM85O-SGI-v-OML4-SMaF-Ia-BIGTX 7 1 , ITS Otr€SIDED 84 REV.. .. . . - \.. , ,:. .. _ _ _ , ..-. .. , .. - .I.. , -.r ; .. ,.... , : , .P l ��T= I ._. - ,,,. , SITE LIGHTING , E L Cx NCx �4N ; . FLAN . _11 1 II .. '... ., .� _ - :. _ ,� , . l , - : SOZ�'.►f CITY OF BOZEMAN V9� Bozeman, Montana F0 Mel Kotur NorthWestern Energy �l SEP 17 2003 121 East Griffin Drive -- . —J Bozeman, MT 5971� OEPa�?iP NT OF PLANNING AKi RE: S1LD Requests Dear Mel: I am in receipt of several requests for the creation of SILDs, and am embarrassingly behind on my reviews. I have become somewhat of a"middle man"in these reviews, and am attempting to weasel my way out! Enclosed are the steps to create an SILD, and my review isn't required in any of those steps. Thus,I'm recommending that once you get the layout of the lights approved in the Planning Office, that you proceed with submitting the letter requesting the SILD to Robin Sullivan, Clerk of the Commission. This should save you a step as well as considerable time as you won't have to wait for my response. With a copy of this letter, I am forwarding to Robin the information you provided me on the following projects: • Diamond Estates, Phase 1 (June 25, 2003) • Baxter Meadows Phase 1 (August 29, 2003) • Cattail Creek Phase 2 Cost update(July 21, 2003) • Laurel Glen Phase 1 (June 18, 2003) I'm confident you know what type of lighting the City is looking for in subdivisions, and really have no need to review the requests. However, please feel free to continue to contact me if you have specific questions I can assist you with. Sincerely, "Hkel Director of Public Service Cc: Robin Sullivan,Clerk of Commission Wattachments Andy Epple,Planning Director Dave Skelton,Senior Planner Street address:411 E. Main St. Phone:(406) 582-2300 Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 Far:(406) 582-2344 Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 TDD: (406) 582-2301 I� / UNTITLED R 3,;) F, Walton Homestead Summary for Layout#1 Kevin Cook Results ( (LPoie Spacing: __22100 ft. Total Luminaires Required: Total Poles Required: 11 0 a Total Cost: $6050.00 [J AUG $ 2003 i Roadway Lighting Standard: IESNA RP-8 Horizontal Illuminance ;,Average`.; ',,080 fc Minimum: fc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 0.32 Maximum: 2.18 fc AND Cn4' TY DEVELOPMENT Max/Min: CBS Ave/Min: 2.53 Roadway Luminance Average: 0.49 cd/sq.M Minimum: 0.20 cd/sq.M Maximum: 1.10 cd/sq.M Max/Min: 5.61 Ave/Min: 2.52 Veiling Luminance Ratio: Average: 0.05 Minimum: 0.00 Maximum: 0.32 Max/Min: 1872.60 Ave/Min: 265.04 Visibility Level Average: r3y27 Minimum: 2.96 Maximum: 3.59 221 ft. Roadway Characteristics Traffic Flow: Two-Way Lane Width: 22.00 ft. Right Side Lanes: 1 Left Side Lanes: 1 Median Width: 0.00 ft. Roadway Length: 1105.00 it. Pavement Classification: R3 Pole Characteristics Pole Properties: ;,Mounting Height: 25.00 ft. Setback: 3.00 ft. —22 a-22 Arm Length: 0.50 ft. Pole Cost: $490.00 Arm Cost: $60.00 Lamp Properties Lamps Per Luminaire: Lamp Lumens: 9500 Description: LU150/55 Luminaire Properties Total Light Loss Factor(w/tilt): 1.00 Efficiency: 0.818 Plan View Wattage: 150.00 Tilt: 0.00° Cost: $0.00 Curve: 178596 Distribution: ( Medium,Type III,Cutoff Luminaire Description: GELS"DECASHIELD 400"DSM'15S"'GMC3" Calculated light levels are based on specific information that has been supplied to GE Lighting Systems. Any differences in luminaire installation,lighted area geometry and obstructions in the lighted area may produce different results from the predicted values. Normal tolerances of voltage.lamp output,and ballast and luminaire manufacturer will affect results. r COLLABORATIVE DESIGN ARCHITECTS z ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 05 August 2003 Dave Skelton, Senior Planner �1i AUG 6 2003 Bozeman Planning Department PO Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COf�''ie^LIN�TY_ ELOPMENT RE: Baxter Meadows Phase I Street Light Plan Dave: Attached is a revised street light layout plan for Phase I. We have reduced the number of fixtures from the original plan due to the cost that each homeowner would incur with the original plan. That cost was $60/month on each house. The criteria used for placement of the revised fixture locations is found in Lighting Section 16.14.230.D. Basically, we have light fixtures at the street intersections, at the end of cul-de-sacs, at path/street intersections and on the landscaped median islands in Gallatin Green. Please review this drawing for conformance and let us know what needs to be done to get this revised drawing approved. I will have the photometrics completed and made available to you if you want them. Thanks for your help. Sincerely, COLLABORATIVE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, INC. Jeffery A. Kanning, AIA JAK/dsh cc: Jerry Williams— Baxter Meadows Lanette Windemaker— Planning Department Loren Cantrell — Langlas &Associates Jim Armstrong — Northern Rockies JAMES W. COONS, AIA JEFFERYA. KANNING,AIA 2260 GRANT ROAD SUITE C . BILLINGS, MONTANA 59102 (406) 246-3443 FAX (406) 248-3765 RO BOX 130467 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59106-0467 E-MAIL : COLLABORATIVE@USAOIG.COM V ® MORRISON DOE MAIERLE, INC. memo An Employee-Owned Company TO: Craig Brawner, P.E., City Engineer R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP FROM: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. RE: Baxter Meadows Conditional Use Permit and Phase 1 PUD Subdivision Applications DATE: November 14, 2001 The following additional conditions of final approvals are offered for consideration by the Planning Board and City Commission 1. The proposed roundabout at Baxter Lane and Ferguson Lane shall be fully improved with the initial phase of the subdivision unless otherwise approved by the City Commission. The design of the roundabout shall be completed with the first phase and right of way, as determined by the design, shall be dedicated on the final plat. A 20 year design life shall be used for the street and roundabout improvements. 2. The deadend street proposed for Latigo Avenue shall be replaced with either a turnaround or cul-de-sac meeting the subdivision regulations. 3. Pursuant to the recommendation of the project Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia & Associates, any damage of Baxter Lane from the intersection of North 19th Avenue to the entrance to the project shall be repaired by the applicant. The applicant shall agree to repair any damage within a one week of notification by the city that repairs are required. The applicant shall post a bond of $10,000, or other security acceptable to the City, with the city to assure that the work is completed. ® MOMSON 00 MMERLE,INC. memo An Employee-Owned Company TO: City of Bozeman Development Review Committee R. Dale Beland, AIA, AICP FROM: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. RE: Baxter Meadows Conditional Use Permit and Phase 1 PUD Subdivision Applications DATE: November 6, 2001 (Revised —Additional Conditions 38 and 39) The following conditions of final approvals are offered for consideration by the DRC in any approvals of the referenced applications. Conditional Use Permit: 1. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be updated and made a part of the application materials submitted for approval of each and all subsequent phases of subdivision. 2. All t ypical s treet s ections, i ncluding s idewalk I ocation w ithin t he right-of- way and provisions for bicyclists, shall be in conformance with the street standards recommended in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update, unless otherwise approved by the City Commission, or by the City Engineer through the plan and specification review and approval process. Specifically, Exhibit "C Street Sections shall be revised as follows: • A. Baxter Lane to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-3; • B. Ferguson Avenue to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2; • C. Equestrian Lane to 60 ft. ROW; • F. Gallatin Green to 56 ft. ROW; • J. Arabian Court, et al to 60 ft. ROW; • Davis Road Initial to dimensions included in Beland memo of 9/19/01 to Williams (excerpt attached); • Davis Road Future to mirror image of Davis Road Initial; and • Deadmans Gulch to "2 Lane Option" per Figure 11-2; 3. A variance to the lot access (frontage) standards in the City Code shall be granted by the City Commission to allow primary lot access off alleys. Snow removal responsibility in alleys used as primary vehicular access to lots shall be private. 4. Stormwater Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the planned unit development for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot and/or phase. 5. The final plan shall coordinate the proposed landscaping with the proposed water and sewer. utilities in a manner acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 6. The applicant is advised that the water and sewer infrastructure required for each phase of development shall be subject to further review. 7. The preliminary plan shows public sidewalks crossing onto Town Home lots. The final plan shall identify such sidewalks and show proposed easements. The final plat for each phase shall grant access easements to the public at these locations. Phase 1 PUD Subdivision: 1. All provisions of the Baxter Meadows Annexation Agreement relating to "filing of any Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Plan approval, or the issuance of any building permit" shall be met, as agreed. 2. Sufficient rights-of-way shall be dedicated and/or acquired as necessary for construction of the proposed modern roundabouts. 3. The modern roundabouts shall be designed by, o r p eer reviewed b y, a professional engineer with roundabout design experience, as determined by the City Engineer. 4. A street and traffic control signage plan for the subdivision shall be prepared and implemented upon review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. One-foot wide "no access" strips shall be placed along Baxter Lane, as appropriate to preclude direct lot access onto Baxter Lane, excepting the two accesses to Lot 142 shown on the Site Plan. 6. All of the recommendations (excerpt attached) made in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Baxter Meadows Development by Robert Peccia & Associates, dated October 2001, shall be implemented with Phase 1 unless specifically identified to be completed with a later phase. Two exceptions are noted: • No improvements to the intersections of Oak Street and Baxter Lane with North 19th Avenue must be completed with Phase 1; and • A decision regarding on-street parking restrictions, if any, on the Baxter Parkway will be made by the City at a later phase. 7. Baxter Lane shall be fully improved to the appropriate typical section where adjacent to Phase 1 . W here Phase 1 includes only one side of Baxter Lane, one half of the appropriate typical section plus an additional 11' driving lane and 5' paved shoulder shall be provided. 8. Maintenance of on-site areas and facilities such as the sewage lift station, alleys, pocket parks, equestrian open space, etc. shall be provided as proffered in the application materials, with the exception that the sewage lift station shall be operated and maintained by the City with the costs of said maintenance being borne by the Property Owners' Association. The Property Owners' Association documents shall provide for reimbursing the City for all such expenses. 9. The emergency access to Baxter Lane from Riata Road shall be constructed. 10.A temporary turnaround shall be provided at the east end of the Equestrian Lane improvements. 11.All street names are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 12.The sidewalk along the east side of Lot 107 shall be extended to the walk on Baxter Lane. 13.The lot numbers on the final plat shall utilize a block and lot numbering scheme as required by Section 16.14.030 E. of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. 14.Prior to filing of the final plat a site plan, complying with the requirements of Section 18.52.030 of the City Zoning Ordinance, for Lots 1 through 27 shall be submitted for review and approval. 15.The applicant shall provide easements, in a form acceptable to the city, for all on and off site sewer and water improvements. All water and sewer main easements shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 16.Easements shall be provided for all offsite drainage facilities. 17.Utility easements shall be granted on the final plat in accordance with the requirements of Section 16.14.050 of the City Subdivision Regulations. 18.The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits for all utilities proposed to be installed in a County right of way. 19.City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any I of owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the plat and in the covenants for the subdivision. 20.The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, MPDES etc.) shall be obtained prior to construction, of the associated improvements. 21.All infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear y and f rontages o r o ther n on-lot f rontages, a nd r elated storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. 22.Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. 23.Provisions for extending sewer mains to adjoining unsubdivided land shall be made in accordance with Section 16.14.100 D of the City Subdivision Regulations. 24.All proposed manholes need to be accessible to the city's large flusher truck. The applicant shall submit an all weather access plan with the project infrastructure plans subject to approval by the City Water/Sewer Superintendent. 25.The proposed sewer service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. 26.The water line in Baxter shall be extended to the west boundary of the Phase 1 Subdivision in accordance with the provisions of Section 16.14.120 F of the City Subdivision Regulations. The water line in Riata Road shall tie into the water line in Baxter Lane to eliminate the dead end main shown on the preliminary plat. 27.The water line in Riata Road near Lot 137 shall be extended to the north to tie into the proposed water line in Ferguson Road. 28.The water system shall be looped and be connected to the existing 12" water line in Deadman's Gulch Road or Catron Street and the existing water line in Oak Street. 29.The proposed water service lines to Lots 1 through 27 are unacceptable as shown and shall be modified with the infrastructure plans. rA 4 , 30.An access road, acceptable to the City Water/Sewer Superintendent, shall be constructed to service all on and offsite water improvements. 31.As part of the infrastructure plan submittal, 100 year flood elevations shall be computed fort he Spring Ditch and the Baxter-Border Ditch, and the limits of flooding identified. If flooding limits encroach onto proposed lots, this shall be noted on the final plat along with a minimum floor elevation for the structures to be constructed on the lots. 32.The Property Owners' Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of all storm water facilities constructed for the project. 33.The applicant shall obtain permission from the appropriate ditch companies to discharge storm runoff into the ditches and for any relocation(s). 34.All ditch easements and setbacks shall be shown on the final plat. 35.The infrastructure plans shall include a detailed grading plan identifying the elevation of all proposed structures. 36.Watercourse setbacks in accordance with Section 16.14.130 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations shall be shown on the final plat. 37.In locations where Baxter Lane is being improved, the various irrigation ditches and stream-ditches shall be either relocated outside of the right-of- way or placed in a pipe. 38.The alley streets shall be maintained by the Property Owners' Association. 39.The alley streets shall be paved to a minimum width of 20 feet. 03/19/2003 17:14 140689 COTTONWOOD Com%ls PAGE 01 P.O.Box 80606 ME Billings, Mt:59108 (406)294A693 (406)8964911 Fax VOIe►,VItlAe G Dew , FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET TO: ,��v S5kF-G JUI4 DATE: ,?11?163 FAX # ya6 58J, _.2 a 6 1-33 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS ONE FROM: HOMAS A y ZUSK Vivid Network, F.O. Sox 80606 Billings, Mt, 59108 Urgent For Your Review Reply ASAP Please Comment 1 - 03/19/2003 17:14 140911 COTTONWOOD CQ10 PAGE 02 _ TCRKS ' vai<.VW.nt 6 DO.o March 19,2003. Dave Skelton Bozeman City Planning Office (406)582-2263 Dear Dave, Vivid Networks is a CLEC operating in the state of Montana The company provides traditional phone,cable television and high speed internet services. Vivid Networks will be providing the residents and busine ses of Baxter Meadows Development with telephone,cable television and internet services through a fiber optics network. The construction of the fiber optics infrastructure will be undertaken by Vivid Netwo&s, Vivid Networks has reviewed the latest plat of the first phase of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision and agrees to operate with the reduced setbacks as shown to accommodate the 10 ft. easements. Sincerely, Thomas Miller Marketing Manager PO Box $0606 Bittings, MT 59108 406.294.9693 Fax: 406.896.4911 www.vividnetworks.com o 'ry B0 THE CITY OF BOZEMAN titer 9x 20 E. OLIVE • P.O. BOX 1230 V BOZEMAN, MONTANA 5977 1-1 230 -��t9?jN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 880�� PHONE: (406) 582-2280 • FAX: (406) 582-2263 MEMORANDUM February 6, 2003 To: Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service D E LB6 Q Rick Hixson, City Engineer Andy Epple, Planning Director 2003 Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Karen Caroline, Assistant Planner James Nickelson, Morrison Maierle DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ICON?MUNITY DEVELOPMENT From: Bob Murray, Project Engineer Re: Baxter Meadows Occupancy As you may recall, in early December a meeting was held between City Staff and representatives of the Baxter Meadows Development regarding occupancy of the houses which are currently. being constructed. The issue was not resolved at that meeting, but we did request that they provide us with a proposal in writing which would describe the infrastructure that would be in place prior to a formal request for occupancy. I finally received that proposal in the mail today. I have attached a copy of the proposal for your review. Once everyone has had an opportunity to review the document, I think it would be appropriate for us to have a meeting to discuss the matter and make a decision as to whether or not we are going'to grant occupancy with only the limited infrastructure in place. I was only provided a few color exhibits, so some of you will have to do with black and white. Let me know if you have any questions. cc: Project File ERF HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK 1 �• ] r+l I� t t�► FEB 0 6 2003---------------------- ALLIED ENGINEERING January 31, 2003 . SERVICES, INC. Robert Murray, PE, Project Engineer City of Bozeman Engineering Department P.O. 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: Baxter Meadows Phase I Improvements Needed for Occupancy Dear Bob: Enclosed is an exhibit showing the infrastructure needed for occupancy for Phase I of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision. In the meeting Tuesday(12/3/02)between City.Staff and Baxter Meadows it was decided an exhibit should be prepared with supporting documentation. The exhibit should clearly indicate what infrastructure will be installed by the time the 11 homes on Gallatin Green are ready for occupancy. This letter and accompanying figure is intended to serve as the exhibit and documentation. Water The water line for Baxter Meadows is already constructed from the point of connection on Oak Street to Baxter Lane, then west on Baxter Lane to Gallatin Green, then north on Gallatin Green to Equestrian Lane and west on Equestrian Lane to Ferguson Lane. Water main has also been installed from the point of connection at Davis Road and Deadman's west along Deadmans to Ferguson. The remaining line from Ferguson and Deadman's south on Ferguson to Equestrian Lane and Ferguson was also constructed earlier, completing a looped water system from the two points of connection. This looped water line is shown as the blue line on the enclosed exhibit. Sewer The sewer line is already constructed the length of Gallatin Green from Baxter Lane to Deadman's. It has also been constructed east on Deadmans from Gallatin Green to the lift station. The lift station structure has been installed and the force main from Davis Lane back to the lift station is installed. The lift station and force main to Davis lane will be operational before occupancy. The sewer line and lift station are shown on the enclosed exhibit in green. 32 Discovery Drive * .Bozeman, MT 59718 ♦ (406) 582-0221 ♦ Fax (406) 582-5770 Bob Murray,PE Project: 01-241 January 31,2003 Storm Drain The storm drain has already been constructed on Gallatin Green from Baxter Lane to Equestrian Lane and from Equestrian Lane to the detention pond. The storm drain lines are shown as orange lines on the enclosed exhibit. Roads Gallatin Green has been constructed to its full width from Baxter Lane to Equestrian Lane. Curb &Gutter has been installed in this section and the roadway has been paved. The approach into Gallatin Green from Baxter Lane is gravel because Baxter Lane is scheduled to be lowered next year when it is improved. The approach will be paved as part of the improvements to Baxter Lane. The intersection at Equestrian Lane and Gallatin Green is partially paved, enough to allow vehicles to remain on a paved surface as they go from northbound to southbound on Gallatin Green. The portion of Equestrian Lane used to access the East Alley will be a full gravel section prior to occupancy as will the East Alley. This will allow access to the garages that face the alley. The house foundations on the west side of the East Alley will be completed and the alley paved next spring. Paving the alley now would have resulted in the pavement being undermined and damaged as the next set of house foundations were constructed. Bosal Street will also have a full gravel section as will the portion of the South Alley that all access to the three garages currently under construction on the South Alley. This will also be paved early next spring. Access to the houses on Gallatin Green currently under construction will be by the paved portion of Gallatin Green. Access to the garages for these houses will be through the gravel alleyways:If .a fire or other emergency were to occur and block a portion of the west side of Gallatin Green, a second emergency paved access is available by going against traffic back out to Baxter Lane. Each side of Gallatin Green is 19 feet wide and should allow two way traffic if need be. Vehicles could also use the 12-foot gravel road the length of Gallatin Green and then the 20-foot wide gravel road down Deadman's to exit at Davis Lane in case of an emergency providing two emergency exits. Baxter Lane improvements will not be completed until next spring. I've included three copies of the exhibit showing the main infrastructure needed for completion before occupancy. I've also included letters from the prospective homeowners acknowledging the impact of construction until everything is complete. Allied Engineering Services,Inc. Page 2 . • Bob Murray, PE Project: 01-241 January 31,2003 The completion of the improvements for the remaining portions of the project will be bonded for final plat. Please.let me know if you have any questions.' Allied Engineering Services;Inc.' Terry . Threlkeld, PE Pn ipal Civil Engineer enc: Exhibit cc: Terry&Claudia Metzler Jerry Williams Allied Engineering Services,Inc.` ' . Page 3 Z p m 5 0 z D m { M 0 D \\ D a p D mtTj O r� S A ;o d p i m ��\���:__" -.- ._-_ -"_ROAD..-...•---_-� ... _ _ zp � o� z z C�' p a m m y �t Z o m Crl1 w g m g CD m STORM DRAIN .5 r m L --1 p LASSO LANE LASSO LANE I I I I I I I I O I I I I -_------ -- -----.J L- -- -- -- - L---- ---- FERGUSON AVcNQE ------------------•---- • o v FERGUSON AVENUE .� WATER UNE . . .. ......_..._. ..._.._. . I I 1 I I I I .• I m t I I I I I f� p EAST ALLEY(GRAVEL) ( 1 I 1 I I I I I GALLATIN GREEN (12' GRAVEL ROAD) J �.." .. ....,...... ...,. •�'i,• - - �ai� W; SEWER UNE - � i---�-- .. ..' I �t I O m d -'--'--'--'--'-- -- --'--'--'-------------------------------- - t GALLATIN GREEN (PAVED) I I I J •I Y H C ! a I z cn I I r >II ! 0 O 0 M m I I ll i z d -- z -•--•-- -------- f > C� cn Z il ( Z ;i i i i i of i b !{ an d I I I I ao{ 'I C7 x I. !p II � II I I I I !i 1 jl U 1111 II I I I I ` ' L I I I I j � I•li i m z i I j I ----------.J L------- --.J 4 n CA � I � tri CIQ !00 fit i co 6'° DQ I• I Iz; I E' � 00 C' I j I I I I Iml 1 00 I I I I I I I 1 Leo ° o I I I I I I I Ei ��• I j I I I I I 'i I O m D p DAMS LANE LT1 ��r F [r D N 0 0 ti r = o i 0 S N 20 b sV+o►n,�aom\m-ni eon.vn.N�csu�a.ov�.vw b }e.v V —V. .. . ' OZEMy � MORRISON WIN MERLE, iN' C. r p _.3 � P.O.BOX 1113•BOZEMAN,MT 59771-1113 -�(-4 0,IE�I�,u yr t`�- g L� r Vluc F 8 2003 Dave Sk6lton �- PO Box 640 OFcgPT".1* ^)F PLANNING Bozeman MT 59771-0640 ANC Y DEVELOPMENT I , BOZE&40 597712030 iA02 07 02/14/03 NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS : CITY OF BOZEMAN PO BOX ti BOZEMAN 1MT059771-123Q ts3 atc3 V$6. ifis11I4141l Its III If Its III MIIIIIIIf#114114141JIfI1„IIIItII I 46W Yesterday, Today& Tomorrow. Agreement We,Paul and Angela Petr, as the intended purchasers of 3675 Gallatin Green Blvd. of Phase I of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision hereby acknowledge that construction activities in and around my lot may result in noise, dust, etc. but the disturbances are temporary in nature and should cease once construction is completed. We furthermore acknowledge the access into my garage is likely to be by gravel roadway until construction has progressed to the point where the alley may be paved. . Baxter Meadows Development, LP Buyer Seller Buyer Date Date Ph.(4oe)582.7523 Fax(406)585.9616 P.O. Box 11060, Bozeman; MT 59719 www.baxtermeadows.com Yesterday, Today& Tomorrow. Agreement +3d-47 We,Aaron and Erin Yost, as the intended purchasers of 367-5 Gallatin Green Blvd. of Phase I of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision hereby acknowledge that construction, activities in and around my lot may result in noise, dust, etc. but the disturbances are temporary in nature and should cease once construction is completed. We furthermore acknowledge the access into my garage is likely to be by gravel roadway until construction has progressed to the point where the alley may be paved. Baxter Meadows Development,LP Buyee Seller Buyer Date T Date r-�r }� t� �y�c`� '} ���,,,/ppp���f r�1 '1 ��i�''+YY' ♦ ��4•r �4�t"`�r�f� r ���' �� f t� �`��{/i��'"�� tf� '1i:�f. -•�ff��{`��/ � �n���� �����I,r�*f'���"fry�g'j���''���,�yt1'�'i�w.K�t-°� ��+, �./,' JJ���"�"�' .45-���d` r�_c!_ .2. ,y,.`5.�.�tT .K/,�.�v *�✓+� i '{iG ri'.,c''ri`.{�.`✓*y .yf;rl": >:«tr+ � 'C•:'�= t. �1„yA'"'��"fi�%�5�:,r.,,� t .x� �F`��3�;,r,Zs��"",`i�r*"a�h.S.ti1'�_ .�� f .r•''� ..! d ?• a,,�, .�°'..�t -,��" .. s'C�;-n f �,.�� .5.1 u r.. a.-�'- a.r`f v' t 4,t ryr,{•�t r i"a. L. _ ".-• �i... �J'F..,.�"�F�4..r �;+,°-^� "r�..i' r�.*� tq SY,,}�,y �'al# L. "" ��t-g �'S t,'1.. •�,`, �� - 5- "r�'}s:�7�,il7'c 1'4.si�-,'•.a$ -.x ,,�,. �"� k�� ^�t`. ... �, .e., Z. ^r .w! v,.�s•. t ,%�YYt �.,'.�} ���.,t 't M1 �S�Sne'.-�•�'+`y.r y23� r�+r f t�, •;.3�a�; ��'''yti.`'•sb�;f ,.?'i'S�a q'.. Y si -,it� ���.a��y. �..Yat r t u� �Y r rY'� •{T 'l��� F ,�.'�,.TM K.�w '..,"�r.� 'S+1�a � y�� ' S•a}} 'd;���'. .�'��•, - Ph' >582 6z� ?58'S � OzK311060,fiBo MT. 5971;9P Boi3 fFa 16 zeman '•'�vw;w bazteie a"dows com s .9rt� ..; �Y fF '+V' �.!'". ➢c' w.1;{w c ,r"C.. -". a.". ^x'v "tO `43,.ctki•- t-..(r R+a w� r.. a_ ,"� S+i-.-ax- ;k4,;.. }. 47L�.• k.tc1' s. ri "iitt �Ll��lta�..'�.i� Yesterday, Today& Tomorrow. Agreement I, Shelia Velazquez, as the intended purchaser of 3611 Gallatin Green Blvd. of Phase I of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision hereby acknowledge that construction activities in-and Around my lot may result in noise, dust, etc. but the disturbances are temporary in nature and should cease once construction is completed. I furthermore acknowledge the access into my garage is likely to be by gravel roadway until construction has progressed to the point where the alley may be paved. If these construction activities should cause damage to the property, BMD,will repair the damage. ' Baxter Meadows Deve ment, LP, jd Buyer- Seller December 17, 2002 December 17, 2002 Date Date '` ,l'-I •f•' .r Ii ems, %°. ,%/.� ;r'/' A/ /: - "! fr,0.Y, J �7- `C 5, J.� // / � tV'5,..�"'di.. f, is f- �,y �tr.-�.� wvV �.Y•T. � • - ,:;f. ryCf r.rt� ». � � Y ]:•... Kx7,. �' 4. i 'T��.s �t ..F ) '�'r�psi wYR'�X�1 t �,.5 t�n -{. a ` .� f � � .w �1�"• wi"d sr < .�✓k,J r ,Y' Y .u't .r s�+ �,, ,, a t !' Oct., �. ;((yy((''--cti� t �:���'; .:�1�vY,•-7�Rr� "G,`i,�¢"'tt,^- I a �t+,Y �. '1Y�;� •�-- '�,,r -.:�-�'r.�At.A�r�i-?. K,� z:�+i,Sd. -i,'.'.r'�:t'�� 1% Y3t:.`+,ii ,•^,�ja_4.3r: A.l.n...,..lL;_.k....K'.`...,4 ��.Xa YY�� y -•.,...< t:u v rk r_.._, .*r ^..n•.-_.-.:.-.r5..- -K v^� T �•+ e- 7rrT•-.t l,arrs " 2Ph esoe>5827523'�•�+Faxcsoe>585k96y16 P OcBox'�y11060"'Bozeman` MT'S97f19'� www�baxtermeadows fcom ^"' 'ti :I. ''F .,45 it"T9f4` %' 'e7.%""k�. . a'fr ( .� V •; 2?K:'AC ;r,1"`_^"a.Y1 ,fit :? 3n.�r ✓' 'i^Sfa.r ar,/'-:,rX '- -'m- �• T.S.}. ,.3 4s,:,�...iS::. :_.:1t.li.�i..•}tz . 43' "`P :...r,a.-"-."3:+t_..__:E.y+,p.�::t'.... :a:' ,..'f4 w�1'.}ias•,F.::r.• -'Fr.�r'�3:a � :i�.^srs.a.,,.�a..,si...�.>..v. __. Yesterday, Today& Tomorrow. Agreement We, Terry-and Claudia Metzler, as the intended purchasers of 3697 Gallatin Green Blvd. of Phase I of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision hereby,acknowledge that construction - activities in and around our lot may result in noise, dust, etc. but the disturbances are temporary in nature and should cease once construction is completed. We furthermore acknowledge the access into my garage is likely to be by gravel roadway until construction has progressed to the point where the alley may be paved. Baxter Meadows elopmerit, LP �Ryyer Seller Buyer Date , Date I1 {/f -�i sir/ 1 "`[•,+.3'S"•l �]J/1*y'i.D,r�F45,r�.id Wf `-�* x I ``� a „ t „>''� "� Y t a+ �. a.t .i ,h>r'F H.,� c�"�� �yRt 'S;t: r v ?�i`r' 4'QT.7' * „Y,•+ �.�,,,,y i -. i.Y 1 ,�+N� � � ::-�,l '4 .. �L 1 v ,��ie4 r,.. �i j'bt Y�f�{.�,t. �y.' a.,,.,tyv- + �,�h �,1, Y,�17'ylfq r..a �y:at.r �,.ts�� �-.'-7�,�yr< <.,. •� dy 9�C'. •� �.37"'. - �V.4rcP�' -....:...�G., •aa..n-..i,,.�T.: i. �..:.'.t✓i�...y. r�,�-';K.�a�?t:;.:,a>S�°_..5: Yz_...,tla!•�.f' �Fi. V.. T.�`:� S. St Si'k � {S�? � �� . a 8596f i 1 - x!"6'62 3tPax_406 , Byov rzo.emanwy;a MT u 597.19 ww,wn b4,at xa�t*eea`r mt eoa d�o`ws '�ctiorrr✓ _ 5^qY ._ ••"fF =`" 1..ic_.a._.:,�. x �' ��Z.+'e ._...._'';, -- -- z-— �',^. gar ..`l 4,` ,...,.'`` +,`A �'.%*f "4Ta+s{ vY ;r.•.. "d .�►,w.�.:K.._ YsE� «r.4..>... st. _1_'. .�.. ..'L..'L _ �._.x.:.�a_y islsa�u' }..(ia�.i�.w'�.+.A:.�:•��2.� �(:-T� e': 01/16/2003 09:20. 14058964911 COTTONWOOD COt• #R PAUE ez w vxiAuiu-) inu u0:17 PAZ 4WA_URIE 0 002/002 ' M Wterdov.TiOny Tomorrow. Agreement I,Kathy Thorson,as the intended purchaser of 3523 Gallatin Green Blvd.of Phase Z of Baxter Meadows Subdivision hereby acknowledge that construction activities in and around my lot may result in noise,dust, etc. but the disturbances are temporary in nature and should cease once construction is completed. I f uthermore acknowledge the access into my gamge is likely to be by gravel roadway until construction has progressed to the point ere the alley may be paved. Baxtex endows elopment,LP r- k, tm IKWrek."l A Buye Sollcr�� Date Date -- 1'h.(a0^)382.7$23 Paxt'O"586.9616 P.Q. "ROX 11060, Bozeman, MT 59719 www.baxrccmeadowx cow MAR.10.2003 3:22PM M0f LAW FIRM NO.047 P.1/b THE L KW FIRM MOORE, O'CONNELL REFLTNG A FROFM10N4-CORPORATION 601 r1AGGER7Y LANE , suin i o,LIFE OF MONTANA I311TT,DING PERRY).MOORE BARRY G.O'OONNELL �Dy ro MARK U.REFLING P.O.BOX 1288 WM.RUSSELLMo£LYEA (� MONTMA S9771-12B$ CINDYR.YOUNKIN D E C k `� E04m, LEPIZONE:(406)587-5511 ALLAN 11."S FAX'(406)587-9079 MICIIAEL).L.CUSICR L:mQtiawCa?awe3i_n-t MAR 1 2 2003 KART L.RICK£NBAUGH(i9nf.zooz) DFPARTpIENT OF PLANNING AN` i':!TYDE " ?TENT March 10, 2003 Debbie Arkell vita Facsimile/U.S. mail: 582-2302 Director of Public Service City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: Conditions Precedent for Issuance of Occupancy Permit our File No. 96037\001 Dear Debbie: Thank you for your letter of March 7 , 2003, regarding Baxter Meadows occupancy for Phase IA. As we discussed during our visit orx Friday, Phase TA includes only the 11 homes adjacent to Gallatin Green. On page 2 of your letter, you identity a number of conditions precedent to issuance of an occupancy permit. item 1 pertains to submittal and approval of a final zoning PUD plan. You indicated that Dave Skelton or Andy Epple would need to sign off on this plan. r will deal with planning to reach an agreement that is acceptable. item 2 stipulates a final plat must be submitted and approved. As you are aware, we are moving rapidly towards final plat approval which includes improvements within the entire Phase 1A subdivision, together with a financial guarantee of those improvements , Item 3 pertains to usable water rights or cash in lieu thereof. At present, we will submit to you payment for the entirety of the water rights necessary for Phase 1, with the understandilZg that we will simultaneously work towards transfer of 50 acre feet of Middle Creek water Users Association to the city. You indicated you would refund the value of those water rights to the developer upon successful transfer. MAR.10.2003 3:23PM M0# LAW FIRM N0.047 P.2i6 Debbie Arkell March 10, 2003 Page 2 Item 4 requires the completion, inspection, and acceptance of water mains. It is my understanding all water mains have been installed and inspected. They have not been charged and pressure tested or tested for bacterial contamination. Remaining chores with respect to water lines are as follows: (1) Get adequate cover over the lines so they can be charged; (2) Charge the lines; (3) Pressure test and bacterial test the water lines; (4) Complete any inspections and/or approvals required by the city; (5) Convey the system to the city. My client estimates this work can be completed within the next two weeks under ideal conditions . Item 5 pertains to completion, inspection, and acceptance by the city of all sewer mains and the lift station. it is my understanding that all sewer lines have been installed and that approximately 90% of the sewer lines have been TV inspected. It is further my understanding that the lift station is complete, but has no power. To meet your requirements for item 5, we need to perform the following tasks: (1) Complete inspection of the sewer lines; (2) Bring power to the lift station; (3) Test the lift station; (4) Complete any inspections or approvals by the city; (5) Convey the sewer lines. Item 6 requires completion, inspection, and acceptance by the city of the storm drain system. It is my understanding all storm drains have been completed and inspected, but not conveyed to the city. To comply with your requirements of item 6, we need to convey the storm drain system to the city. MAR.10.2003 3:23PM M LAW FIRM N0.047 P.3i6 Debbie Arkell March 10, 2003 Page 3 Stem 7 pertains to completion of streets and roads . In item 7, you indicate one of the principal concerns is secondary access . Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a map of the Phase I area showing the roads we intend to either pave or bring to final grade with appropriate base to supply temporary access. All roads within Phase I will be completed to the standards and specifications shown in the plans already submitted to the city. Attached as Exhibit B is a map of the roads that will be completed as work on Baxter Lane commences . Please note that additional roads outside of the Phase I area will be completed to a 24-foot wide county standard width. Please note that Exhibits A and B show use of Equestrian Lane as a conduit to Ferguson Avenue, rather than Bosal. (Roads cross hatched on facsimile and yellow highlighted on original) . Our theory was that Equestrian Lane was on the perimeter on the majority of the Construction activity, and that using Equestrian would be preferable to use of Bosal as a connector to Ferguson. As I indicated during our visit on Friday, Baxter Meadows has contracted with Bozeman Sand & Gravel for completion of the work set forth above. Outside of Phase I, Baxter Meadows will be performing the work. As an example, improvements to Trakker Lane will be performed by the developer rather than the contractor. In addition, you will be supplied with a signage, barricade, and traffic flow plan to ensure that traffic continues to flow safely and smoothly during periods of construction on Baxter Lane or during periods -of construction on the roads at issue,. The contract with Bozeman Sand & Gravel stipulates that all roads referenced above in Phase I will be paved by May 8, and the contract includes a penalty clause. To ensure that adequate maintenance occurs, including grading, pothole repairs, snow removal, and dust abatement, the developer will maintain the following equipment on site on a 24 hour basis: (1) 3 . 5 yard front-end loader with dump truck; (2) Road grader; (3) Water truck; (4) skid steer loader; MAR. 10.2003 3:23PM M LAW FIRM N0.047 P.4ib Debbie Arkell March 10 , 2003 Page 4 (5) Two vibratory rollers _ in addition, the developer has 50, 000 yards of 1-inch minus road mix on site which can be used for interim repairs. During the pendency of work on Baxter Lane and on interior roads, all the foregoing equipment will remain on site. ' General construction supervision will be the responsibility of Langlas & Associates . The contact person for repairs to roads, snow removal, dust control, and other issues is Loren Cantrell.. His cell phone number is 406--860-1867 . His phone number is 406-656-0629 . His address is' 2270 ; Grant road, Billings, Montana 59102 . If you have any questions about the foregoing plan, please contact Terry Threlkeld until March 17, 1 should be back in Sozenan by then and you can refer any additional issues to me at that time. In discussing these issues with my client and my clients , personnel, I have emphasized the need for good faith adherence to the proposals set forth above, and for strict adherence to maintenance, traffic flow, and safety issues as the plan unfolds . I have also emphasized that successful implementation of this plan will go a long way to establishing a long-term relationship of trust with the city which will be beneficial to all involved when additional concurrent construction and occupancy issues arise in the future. As I indicated during my visit with you on Friday, I will do whatever I can to ensure this plan unfolds smoothly. Sincerely, 1Z.3 ti RUSS McELYEA WRM/ml k S k Enc, (2 Exhibits) GC7�i Cc: Jerry Williams w/encs. (via facsimile: 585- 616) Jeff Kanning w/encs , (via facsimile: 406-248-3765) Terry Threlkeld, Allied Engineering w/encs. (via facsimile: 582-5770) Loren Cantrell, Langlas & Assocs. w/encs , (via facsimile: 406--656-1088) MEL,6 9 8 0 .WPD rr ��,. �` � � rr MO ■M M■ MONOMERS MEN MEN No . mom ME Lrrrrrrrirr� j� / _ l�I Er rrr NONEi� MESON iM ■ -r Sri � j MEN MEN 0 IS ■■■■ ill■■■■■■■■ �■ t�� MEN IMIN 0 �'� �. ►ram MEMOOEM . -011 �� ^�irr•_� i�r��'1 r I1 MOMSON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS LA SURVEYORS PLANNEMAIERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 • FAX:4 6-587-1R76 An Employee-Owned Company February 12, 2003 Tim Cooper City Attorney's Office ' City of Bozeman ay P.O. Box 1230 L Bozeman, MT 59771 Re: Baxter Meadows Review -A _. Easements and Lift Station Agreement MMI #0417.034 Dear Mr. Cooper: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. is working for the City Engineering Office in a review capacity on this development project. As part that review we have been tasked with reviewing the easements associated with the project infrastructure and annexation requirements. The legal descriptions for the attached easements were reviewed by Morrison-Maierle, Inc. and found be acceptable, however the language in -the easement documents. does not match the City's standard language. Discussions with the applicant's representative indicates that they wish to proceed forward with the nonstandard language. The following.is a summary of the:easements provided for your'review:- 1. Temporary Turnaround Easement for dead end roads in two locations. 2. Public Street and Utility Easement for a portion of the collector and arterial street easements required under the annexation agreement. 3. Public Sewer Main Easement for a sewer main located outside of the boundaries of the Phase 1 plat. 4. Fire Hvdrant Easement for water mains. and fire hydrants that are stubbed outside of the boundaries of the Phase 1 plat. 5. Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Agreement and Access Easement for the lift station associated with the project. Patricia Day-Moore reviewed the first draft of the lift station agreement and found it acceptable with the addition of the "attorney fee" provision, since that time the access easement language has been added. It may be clearer for future users if two separate documents were utilized. 6. Public.Street Easement for the roundabout at the intersection of Baxter Lane and Ferguson. Avenue in addition to water and sewer line improvements. Each of the documents has multiple-deviations from the standard and as such in the*iriterest of time we have not identified each of the changes in this transmittal.. "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" Akk MORRISON I MMERLE,INC. If you would like to discuss the changes or if you would like a specific description of each of the changes please let me know. Additional easements will be forwarded to you as they are provided by the applicant. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me know. I can be reached at 587-0721. Sincerely, MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. James R. Nickelson, P.E. Bozeman Office cc: Bob Murray, P.E., City Engineering (enclosures) Dave Skelton, City Planning Russ McElyea, Moore, O'Connell & Refling, PC Jerry Williams, Baxter Meadows Development, LP Enclosures Ii MOMSON ENGINEERS �,��. ''�� SCIENTISTS �,_-��i SURVEYORS NNERS MMERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVO • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 • FAX:406-5587-1 76 An Employee-Owned Company February 12, 2003 Greg Finck, L.S. Allied Engineering Services 32 Discovery Dive Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Baxter Meadows Review Easements MMI #0417.034 Dear Greg: We have reviewed the easements provided with the latest draft .submittal of the final plat last week and have the following comments: General Comment As discussed, the City has standard.,-easement documents for water and sewer utilities in addition to street and utility easements. If the standard language is utilized the review by the city is expedited, otherwise each document needs to be fully reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. It is my understanding that the deviations from the City standard are desired and as such the documents will be sent to the City Attorney's Office for their review. Comments on Easements Provided: 1. Storm. Drainage Easement - The grantee for this easement should be changed from the City to the Home Owners' Association as they are the.entity responsible for the maintenance of these facilities. Please provide a revised easement for these facilities. 2. Temporary Turnaround Easement - The easement on the east end of Equestrian Way did not have a written description with the copy provided to us. 3. Ferguson Street and. Utility Easement - This easement excludes the west one-half of the easement across Tract 1A of COS 2202A. This is needed to both comply with the annexation agreement and to provide easements for the water and sewer lines being installed as part of Phase 1. 4. Smith Easement - The easement does not extend far enough to the. south along the Ferguson Avenue alignment to allow for the installation of the proposed utilities. "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" MORMSON 'dam MMERLE,INC. Missing Easements 1. West side of Ferguson Avenue "street and utility" easement along east boundary of Tract 1A of COS 2202A. 2. Deadmans Gulch "street and utility" easement from Ferguson Avenue to westerly boundary of annexation along the section line. 3. Davis Lane "street and utility" easement from Deadmans Gulch to Oak Street. 4. Oak Street "street and utility" easement across southerly boundary fo the annexation. 5. Ferguson Avenue "street and utility" easement from south boundary of Phase 1 to southern boundary of annexation. 6. Baxter Lane for all areas with in the annexation and outside of the Phase 1 plat. 7. Water and sewer line easement for the utility lines running from the north end of Riata Road to Ferguson Avenue. If you have any questions regarding these comments please give me a call at 587-0721. Sincerely, MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. James R. Nickelson, P.E. Bozeman Office cc: Bob Murray, City Engineering Office Dave Skelton, City Planning Office Tim Cooper, City Attorney's Office Russ McElyea, Moore, O'Connell & Refling, PC Jerry Williams, Baxter Meadows Development, LP so CITY 0 BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 co �o��e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: TIM COOPER, STAFF ATTORNEY DEBBIE ARKELL,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE FROM: DAVE SKELTON, SENIOR PLANNER - _ RE: BAXTER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, PHASE IA FINAL PLAT REVIEW DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2003 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attached please find: 1) a copy of the "Reservation" clause on the final subdivision plat for Phase 1A, as well as contained in the protective covenants for Baxter Meadows Subdivision homeowner's association, and 2) draft Escrow Agreement prepared proposed by Jerry Williams financially guarantee the .outstanding subdivision improvements that will not be installed with the filing of the final plat. Please review the "Reservation" clause and advise the Planning Office if this is an acceptable statement on the final plat. You will also note that the "Grant of Public Utility Easement" on the final plat is not consistent with the language provided in 16.14.060 "Easements" of the subdivision regulations. In addition, the developer/applicant for final plat review proposes to execute the attached Escrow Agreement in-lieu of, or a modification of, the standard Improvements Agreement prepared by Karin Caroline in January 2003. Staff respectfully requests that you advise staff if the Escrow Agreement is an acceptable document to guarantee the required subdivision improvements and if the "Reservation" clause and "Grant of Public Untility Easement" is appropriateness with the filing of this plat. Thank you for your assistance with the review of this project. DS/dps Attachments planning• zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination lk r BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT Park Improvements Cost Estimate 2-27-2003 Prepared by: Teresa Olson, L.A. CAD Advantage 80630 Gallatin Road Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 585-7848 home/office (406) 580-7561 cell Estimates include but are not limited to: Site prepwork, plant materials (excluding those already purchased by Baxter Meadows Development and in storage for park planting), turf seeding, site amenities, play equipment, shrub bed edging, liner and mulch, landscape boulders, wildflowers and trails. Pocket Parks $35,260 Irrigation$20,447 Linear Park $20,825 Irrigation $43,560 TOTAL $56,085 $64,007 TERESA E. OLSON, L.A. 80630 Gallatin Road Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 580-7561 cell (406) 585-7848 phone/fax email tolson@imt.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EDUCATION University Montana State University, Bozeman MT 59715 Majored in Horticulture/Landscape Design Bachelor of Science Landscape Design option December 1996 CERTIFICATION Registered Landscape Architect within the state of Montana EXPERIENCE Landscape designing sole proprietor since October 1998. Previous business name: CAD Advantage (List of specific work experience available upon request.) CAD Advantage 80630 Gallatin Road Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 585-7848 home/office (406) 580-7561 cell 2-27-2003 BAXTER MEADOWS DEVOPMENT BERM CLARIFICATION Berms located in.the pocket and linear park of Phase One Baxter Meadows Development are shown at F contour intervals. Berms are to be 2' high of earthen berm and mulched as specified. Statement by: Teresa Olson, L.A. Project designer f - 0 ENGINEERS � �� MORF?60N SCIENTISTS �i--JI WdERLE, INC. SURVEYORS 1+��P,_�!W PLANNERS 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 FAX:406-587-1176 An Employee-Owned Company March 26, 2003 Tim Cooper City Attorney's Office City of Bozeman . P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 Re: Baxter Meadows Review Easements M M I #0417.034 Dear Mr. Cooper: Attached are the original signed easement documents (nine separate : documents) and lift station agreement prepared by the Baxter Meadows applicant for the Phase 1 final plat application. The easements are generally in the standard format with the exceptions noted in previous correspondence. It is my understanding based on what has been represented by the applicants legal counsel that your office has found the proposed modifications acceptable. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this issue, can be reached at 587-0721. Sincerely, MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. James R. Nickelson, P.E. Bozeman Office cc: ;Dave Skelton,'City Planning Bob Murray, P.E., City Engineering Enclosures "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" i BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMO, L.P. 6237 JOB ADDRESS-COST CATEGORY Inv Date Invoice # GL Num Amount H001-0 Phase I Development-1430 Water Service-Curb stop- 3/24/2003 Cash in Lieu 1410 $21,173.47 PAID TO: BZMN CIT CITY OF BOZEMAN 24-Mar-03 $21,173.47 @! @@ @@ CITY OF BOZEMAN *** CUSTOMER RECEIPT *** Oper: CASHIER Type; FC Date: 3/28/B3 B1 Drawer: 1 Receipt no: 85020 Description UR PAY IN LIEU PATE 1 Amount BAXTER MEADOYS DEVELOPMNT f21173.47 BAXTER MEADOYS PH I Tender detail DD DIRECT DE Total tendered 6237 $21173.47 Total paYment $21173.47 $21173.47 Trans date: 3128103 Time: 8:16:18 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT HAVE A NICE DAY! CITY OF BOZEMAN V9� Bozeman, Montana c� �e March 25 41 12'0 •r,N co co . Sanders MAR 2 6 2003 Vice President—Commercial Real Estate First Interstate Bank DEPARTMENT QF PLANNING P. O. Box 30918 AND �, '��'TY DEVELQPPIENT Billings, MT 59116-0918 RE: Baxter Meadows Subdivision Phase 1 Escrow—Jerry Williams Dear Mr. Sanders: To follow up on our March 20, 2003 meeting, this is to advise you that James Nickelson,P.E.,Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,901 Technology Blvd South,Bozeman MT 59718, 587-0721 will be the representative from the City of Bozeman who will be your contact regarding the release of escrow funds for the above-referenced project. In his absence,the contact will be Robert Murray,P.E., City of Bozeman Staff Engineer, P.O. Box 1230,Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, 582-2280. It is our understanding that the following process will take place for the release of escrow: 1) Someone from the development team (preferably their engineer) will contact James and provide him with specific information about the work that has been completed and the amount of funds requested to be released. 2) James and/or Bob will inspect the work and advise you if the work has been . approved for payment. Please notify me if there is a contact other than you. 3) You will notify American Land Title to release the specified funds. 4) American Land Title will secure lien waivers and provide a check to the specified contractor. We are committed to processing the requests as quickly as possible. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 582-2306. Sincerely, J Debra H. Arkell Director of Public Service DA/dla Cc: James Nickelson,P.E. Bob Murray,P.E.,Staff Engineer Dave Skelton,Senior Planner Russ McElyea,The Law Firm Terry Threlkeld,Allied Engineering Street address:411 E.Main St. Phone:(406)582-2300 Mailing address:P.O.Box 1230 Fax:(406).582-2344 Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 TDD:(406)582=2301 Y f , (IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII page:127448 IIIIINIIIIII111111111111 10/10/2003 01:31P IIIIIIIII / Shelley Vanoe-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 - CONCURRENT CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR BAXTER MEADOWS PUD, PHASE 1 This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 064040,111, , 2003, by and between Baxter Meadows LLP, a Montana Limited Partnership, P.O. Box 10037, Bozeman, MT 59771-10037, hereinafter called the "Subdivider", and the City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Montana, with offices at 411 East Main Street, P. O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230, hereinafter called the "City". WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Subdivider to obtain building permits for Baxter Meadows Phase 1 prior to the installation of all required subdivision improvements; and WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose of both the Subdivider and the City to hereby enter into an Agreement, which will guarantee the full and satisfactory completion of the required improvements, related with the property hereinafter described; and it is the intent of this Agreement, and of the parties hereto, to satisfy the improvements guarantee requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Proper , Description This Agreement pertains to, and includes, those properties which are designated and identified as being: A portion of Baxter Meadows Phase 1, located in the S %2 of Section 34, T1S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, consisting of the following 12 proposed lots as shown on the Final Plat of Phase 1 of the Baxter Meadows PUD, subject to all existing easements of record or of fact. Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2 Lots 8, 9, 19 and 20 of Block 3 Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11 of Block 5 Lots 2 and 4 of Block 7 2. Improvements The required subdivision improvements are identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003 with the exception H A96037\001UAS2360.WPD • ���������������������� ���������� �� 21,2 o f 6 I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 10/10/2003 01:31P Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 of the following: Asphalt paving for the Middle, West and South Alleys, sidewalks, street lights and landscaping. 3. Financial Guarantee, Time for Completion of Improvements It is the Subdivider's intent with this Agreement to obtain building permits prior to completion of all required subdivision improvements. Therefore, this Agreement shall be secured by a financial guarantee in the form of a Bond issued by Flynn Insurance, Bond No. 965001559 dated August 12th, 2002 in the amount of one million, seven hundred ninety nine thousand, five hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety cents ($1799,514.90), which is more than one hundred and fifty(150) percent of the Estimated Cost of said improvements. The improvements are financially guaranteed through the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" dated March 31, 2003. The Subdivider hereby agrees that the improvements will be completed either prior to the time identified in the "Improvements Agreement for Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Phase 1" date March 31, 2003 or prior to requesting occupancy for the proposed structures whichever event occurs first." 4. Inspection Representatives of the City shall have the right to enter upon the property at any reasonable time in order to inspect it and to determine if the Subdivider is in compliance with this Agreement, and the Subdivider shall permit the City and its representatives to enter upon and inspect the property at any reasonable time. 5. Default Time is of the essence of this Agreement. If the Subdivider shall default in or fail to fully perform any of its obligations in conformance with the time schedule under this Agreement, and such default or failure shall continue for a period of thirty(30) days after written notice specifying the default is deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Subdivider at P.O. Box 81487, Billings, MT 59108-1487 or such other address as the Subdivider shall provide to the City from time to time, without being completely H A96037T001 V AS2360.WPD 2127448 IIII Papa: 3 of 6 III I IIII(IIII III IIII III III II IIII IIII III 101 101 IIII 200 3 01.31P Shillay Vance-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 remedied, satisfied, and discharged, the City may elect to enforce any of the following specified remedies: A) The City may, at its option, declare the financial guarantee to be forfeited and secure the complete construction and inspection of the improvements described herein. The City's representative, contractors, and engineers shall have the right to enter upon 'the property and perform such work and inspection, and the Developer shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. In the event that any funds remain from the financial guarantee upon completion of all improvements, such funds shall be promptly returned to the Subdivider. B) The City may enforce any other remedy provided by law. 6. Indemnification The Developer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City of Bozeman against any and all claims, at Developer's own expense, arising out of or resulting from the acts or omissions of Developer or its agents, employees, or contractors, whether negligent or otherwise, in connection with the performance of work described in this agreement. The City shall be responsible for any claims arising from negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the City or its agents or employees, except the Developer shall be responsible for those claims of negligence and misconduct arising from the Developer, its agents, or employees not providing to the Municipality, its agents or employees, information relevant to the subject matter of this agreement. The parties shall cooperate in the defense of Claims and shall furnish records, information, and testimony and attend proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary. 7. Attorney Fees In the event it becomes necessary for either party to this Agreement to retain an attorney to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including fees, salary, and costs of in-house counsel including City Attorney. 8. Warranty H:\96037\001\JAS2360.WPD 2127448 IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIII � III IIIIIIIIIIIII III IIII IIII Pew 4 of 6 01:31P Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 36.00 The Subdivider shall warrant against defects of all improvements and that these improvements are made in a good and workman-like manner for a period of one (1) year from the date of their written acceptance by the governing body. 9. Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the Sate of Montana. In the event of litigation concerning this Agreement, venue is in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, State of Montana. 10. Modification or Alterations No modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall valid, unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties hereto. 11. Invalid Provision The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. 12. No Assignment It is expressly agreed that the Subdivider shall not assign this Agreement in whole, or in part, without prior written consent to City. 13. Successors Except as provided in paragraph twelve (12), this Agreement shall be binding upon, enure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 14. Acknowledgement of Increased Risk The Subdivider acknowledges in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532, Section 1.3.f, recognizes, acknowledges and assumes the increased risk if loss because certain public services may not exist at the site. 15. Occupancy of Structures The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.11 and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.h recognizes and acknowledges that no structures on property identified in this Agreement will be occupied until the required infrastructure improvements identified in Section 2 of this Agreement have been completed or H:\96037\001\JAS2360.WPD s j 2127448 IIIIIII Papa: S of 6 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIIII IIIIII IIII ,0l,IIIIII ®/z III 003 0 1.31P Shelley Vance-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 commencement of any used constructed or proposed within the boundary of the PUD or TND will be allowed until required infrastructure improvements have been completed, inspected and accepted by the City of Bozeman and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. 16. Incremental Issuance of Building Permits The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section. 1.3.d recognizes and acknowledges that building permits may be issued incrementally, dependent on the status of installation of the infrastructure improvements, for Phase 1 a of the Baxter Meadows PUD. 17. Supplemental Fire Hazard and Liability Insurance The Subdivider, in accordance with the terms of Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1533, Section 3.3.1.d and Bozeman City Ordinance No. 1532 Section 1.3.d will provide fire hazard and liability insurance with the City named as an additional insured. L DOWNER Je I iam.s, General Partner Baktjr Meadows Development, LP STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of & ) On this Yyh day of Qe]6 �y , 2003, before me a Notary Public of the State of Montana, personally appeared Jerry Williams, known to me to be the general partner of Baxter Meadows Development, LP, the partnership that executed the foregoing in Improvements Agreement, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. �Q S . $fit` Printed Name ;� �xarlal Seam,�y'�s Notary Public for the State of Montana 'aJ,�tI AR � Residing: Bozeman, Mont a £ Commission Expires: M46 der r '11.- ' 7\GQl,V.•A82`j(--,VFb �� �F F°,t��3FF 2127448 IIIIII PG 0/10/2003 01:31P IIIII III IIIII 111�9 IIIIII (IIIIII IIIII IIIII (III Shelley Vanoe-Gallatin Co MT MISC 36.00 THE CITY OF BOZEMAN Debr H. Arkell Direct r of Public Service STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On the day of CitJ , 2003, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared , known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as of the City of Bozeman, whose name is subscribed to the within i strument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above. Printed Name Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing: Bozeman, Montana Commission Expires: �DD�o _` aft , s t' H:\96037\00l VAS2360.W PD