Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
638300224243361239)
Z-05128 Lowe's PLID Preliminary Plan E of N 19th Ave./N of Tschache Ln./S of Baxter Ln. Philip Saccoccia,Jr. May 24,2005 rP 1 1� it l I� 1 i ti Ey i METAL CANOPY SPLIT FACE CMU METAL SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF TUBE STEEL FENCE W/ WOOD TRELLIS I WOOD TRELLIS VINYL COATED CHAIN t STONE VENEER "r LINK MESH BEHIND IND z' Qa r. „ ,:. •. ,:, i N,L1' .. .. '♦ i t 1 '-() fit• '!. tl� w�� {Y��'C.• .� , M` l (� C As �s WEST ELEVATION TWO TONE SPLIT FACE CMU VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE Se t t r .. .. _a, `. ., s :a. .tt-��h ,ti.,,, ,-.,. ..re, , >�•v'/,'�i _�� ,��*� .1;•rx~f. :; s:�'�r t�s J IX l ♦ F x n. a .f v ' EAST ELEVATION - METAL SIDING TWO TONE SPLIT FACE CMU METAL SIDING i - - 1 :�-,,,;wr .,,,.r, ....r.. ,,. ._,,.,. r...: .. _.s,-•,-..,. . ,.,,. _, ,..�: s, .xr s.,,."t;�, :',: �, ..a;�K >a as >,NORTH ELEVATION WOOD TRELLIS GARDEN CENTER TUBE STEEL FENCE W/ TWO TONE METAL ROOF; i SHADE STRUCTURE VINYL COATED CHAIN SPLIT FACE CMU (BEYOND) LINK MESH BEHIND t v I t i it t `12 r.V � (,� - - • � • • I�It i i SOUTH ELEVATION METAL CANOPY 1110112TN AVE.NE SUITE MO LOWE0'S of BOZEMAN 5 20e 40' BELLEVUE, 98004� CONCEPT ELEVATIONS t425.463.20 MulvannnnyG22com� LOWS s BOZEMAN, MONTANA 5.10.05 Page 1 of 2 Jami Morris From: Jami Morris Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:55 AM To: 'Molly Skorpik' Subject: RE: Bozeman Lowe's Sign Design Molly, We will accept a slightly different sign since it will better match the Lowe's elevations. Our preference is Option A but we have comments on that sign as well. 1. The overall sign dimensions need to match those approved with the PUD. a. 14 feet wide instead of 17 feet depicted b. tenant cabinet a maximum of 8 feet wide instead of 9 feet c. the height of the Lowe's sign area 3'6" instead of 5 feet d. tenant height 8 feet instead of 8'6" 2. The distance between the cover and the Lowe's sign appears awkward. Decrease the gap significantly. Jami Morris,Associate Planner Bozeman Planning & Community Development 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 jmorris@bozeman.net -----Original Message----- From: Molly Skorpik [mailto:mskorpik@m-m.net] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:51 AM To: Jami Morris <JMorris@BOZEMAN.NET Cc: Andy Epple; MWack@HarlanLaws.com; Jack.R.Mandel@Lowes.com; Keith Belden; swimley@nellenandswimley.com; Philip Saccoccia Subject: Bozeman Lowe's Sign Design Jami- I have had inquiry from Lowe's signage consultant regarding the Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines for sign design. The consultant, Harlan Laws, is in the process of preparing the sign package for review. Their question to me is what is their degree of design flexibility with the free-standing signs? They do not intend to deviate from the sign maximum height or square footage but would like to incorporate architectural features and materials in the design that would complement the Lowe's building elevations.Their design looks slightly different than the signage guidelines on file for the Saccoccia PUD. I attached a four different options that the consultant is entertaining. Could you please provide guidance indicating if the attached sign concepts are appropriate for this project? Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Molly R. Skorpik, PE Design Engineer Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 12/6/2005 i Lowe's Cabinet 85 Sq.Ft. OPTION A O LOWE'S @ Bozeman,MT e Tenant Cabinet 76.5 Sq.Ft. (1)Required Scale:114°=V-0° Total 161.5 Sq.Ft. HARLAN LAWS 17'-0" Lowe's Cabinet _ CORPORATION -� Signs of.Success 9'-0°TenantCabinet� _ Durham,N.C. Phoenix,AZ. San Diego,CA. Los Angeles,CA. Tel:(919)596-2124 Fax:(919)596-0421 Harlanlaws.com This design is the property of Haden TF Laws Corporation and camiul Liu used c co ' - - or distributed in (� without the approval Internally Illuminated LOWE'S Letters umi of said company Phase: ■Conceptual TENANT ❑Deslgn Development Eo N ❑Final Production TENANT 1-1....I... Internally Illuminated DRWG.#: W05605 TENANT Tenant Cabinet with DATE. 31 OCT 05 Eo TENANT Lexan Faces REV.DATE LOCATION: Bozeman,MT TENANT _ Pole covers FILE: Bozeman,MT 10-31-05 TENANT finished to match SALES REP.: bldg."Mossy Rock DRAWN BY: WACK (Natural Stone)" SCALE: as noted LOWEIS Bozeman,MT • .ice Approved by C 61 Date: PG.7 5+pn o78Lccesa•kr Fdtp taus Lowe's Cabinet 65 Sq.Ft. OPTION B O LOWE'S @ Bozeman,MT 0 Tenant Cabinet 76.5 Sq.Ft. (I)Required Scale:1/4"=V-0" Total 161.5 Sq.FL HARLAN LAWS 17'-0" Lowe's Cabinet CORPORATION 11'-7"Tenant Cabinet Signs of Success Durham,N.C. Phoenix,AZ. San Diego,CA. Los Angeles,CA. Tel:(919)596-2124 Fax:(919)596-0421 Harlanlaws.com ............ "This design is the " o property of Harlan rn ' Internally Illuminated Laws Corporation LOWE'S Letters and cannot be used or distributed vrilhaut the approval of said company Pole covers finished to match Phase: bldg."Mossy Rock ■Conceptual 4 Tenant I Tenant (Natural Stone)" ❑Design Development a. T ❑Final Production Tenant Tenant Internal) Illuminated Y ORWC.#: """•""W05605 Tenant abinetwth Lexan Faces DATE. 31 OCT OS Tenant Tenant REV DATE: � LOCATION: Bozeman,MT FILE: Bozeman,MT 1031.05 SALES REP: DRAWN BY: WACK SCALE: as noted �I Approved by: Date: PG.7 �e E 'S.yns al Success•Ior Fdry yoen q O LOWE'S @ Bozeman,MT Lowe's Cabinet 85 S .Ft. OPTION C i Tenant Cabinet 76.5 Sq.Ft. (1)Required Scale:1/4"=P-0" Total 161.5 Sq.Ft. _ - - HARLAN LAWS r7'-8" Main Sign Body CORPORATION 17'-0"Sign Cabinets Signs Of Success Durham,II ' Phoenix,AZ. San Diego, TF Los Angeles,,CA. c Tel:(919)596-2124 ' Internally Illuminated Fax:(919)596-0421 LOWE'S Letters Harlanlaws com •This design is theparty 77 TENANT TENANT Internally Illuminated LawsCorrploration Tenant Cabinet with and cannot be used TENANT TENANT LexanFaces or distributed Othoul the approval TENANT TENANT of said company Phase: ■Conceptual c sR ❑Design Development owlI�9 ❑Final Product!n N Pole covers DRwC.a',''•''W05605 finished to match DATE: 31 OCT 05 bldg."Mossy Rock REV.DATE: S a� (Natural Stone)" LOCATION. Bozeman,MT FILE: Bozeman,MT 1031-05 SALES REP.: a :a lam 1ti DRAWN BY: WACK t �S, SCALE: as noted fj LOWE'S Bozeman,IVIT Approved by: r Date: PG.7 'Signv ol5ecuv'br Rfry yeas i Lowe's Cabinet 85 Sq.Ft. OPTION D O LOWE'S @.Bozeman,MT � Tenant Cabinet 76.5 Sq.R. t 11 Required Scale:1/4^=1'-0" HARLAN LAWS Total 161.5 Sq.Ft. _ 17'-0"Lowe's Cabinet CORPORATION Signs of Success T-0'Tenant Cabinet ,..,.,,,,.. Durham,N.C. Phoenix,AZ. San Diego,CA. Los Angeles,CA. Tel:(919)596-2124 Fax:(919)596-0421 Harlanlaws.com Internally Illuminated This design is the co ' LOWE'S Letters property of Harlan Laws Corporation Letters mounted to surface and cannot be used Matching bldg elevation or distributed materials and color without the approval of said company TENANT Phase: ...... Phase: �---'---- --_-- --TENANT ■Conceptual ❑Design Development N ' TENANT „ ❑Final Production TENANT ! - Pole covers DRwe.a: W05605 - -- —- - — finished to match DATE: 31 OCT 05 TENANT "p bldg."Mossy Rock REV.DATE, _ TENANT ' (Natural Stone)' � LOCATION: Bozeman,MT OW _ FILE: Bozeman,MT 10.31-05 1 SALES REP: _., DRAWN BY: WACK SCALE. as noted client Bozeman,IVIT Its- : k Approved by: .. - - Date: VG.7 / ' 1t srmn w5ucrez W Rfb,year, �i 1 = '1 pp�p�••��WO IIg�ppi�{���' e� •aYf•sno'v�•.�r•1,•6 `/ .?• h••• �. • ___...e,.. _ ri. •. 1i ai =:- :MYVI J..��•�Ja._� '''.•.�_ . __ -r.�ui�• .•' .' ••fr✓'r�' ,:• > •:�. w', ✓a.Sw ;! vXD,}{•a c^?'}rr4` S� .,�{' `>}•;r r�••♦,'.•:;' h n I f• >, •r' r Y 'a:; >e,,i� C•7 ,• G• '• r'�J 4 4 '• 4 •;,•ori•.T•`^-"•. f• •Wl:..u/ _ Y � �1) J..C.,r 4• :>'!,t;�Y� r,r4Y, N• fr��• WrW �r,•'?,'Ykj ;.y�..,.•,o;:✓ •• r v'A�E'fi-..:.r,..._ n-, •••• _ - --- -M- y.,?dr ;'h:••L.,h4:•�.0°n}>'id: •v>✓,v,. C,. !?'..: ''>'°:- r •r>ti.<..• Zvh.{j �-d, s, �ai9 .4n}; :.=.��.s�,✓;dtirn!.•.. `✓. ayy. G�'•7+•},yJ -,tiJ<>•w,,•�.<�'F�� G;?' vY7>'Y?'•.YGS;F•••';ljsd �r:•A'�dv�G G`?!>' +'`•Jr F:.1°�'}°Gti'S:•9:>fps,.;.+.�{.;a.�;.•' - 1 .;?{.}:•: -'r:>:>?:•>:vS:{4v✓:.•.•::h. G�.';!;?v.•.n}?�.Srfi•F• .?r>.;.Z4>''✓,•••fg rty.•'.•fi. Y.r R {•rJ nr{.yr,>�{d•✓ry{T,.Y. .•fv,. ✓ ✓2,.h S�® vv •v.•.•.•:•::• {, >~,do4w✓.•4}.•:!.{>,.,.✓y>;A•v>F•f.. 0,.} . !�.'v.,. .I•Yvrr.,.q..}S•'4?.. .;?>✓•y:�•»;:>✓rd:�4?'Y'•"FG•✓E.EG•:? ,f�f.•i '' :.•S;v ',�✓7 �. ;°•.. ..Y.;:{:•i:&::SG�e•: .•."E .•:•:>vh•..•.•.•!..'•.>.!^r,, .::✓?•.•..: w i.•.;>.?;4r.`•.{.¢,f. d>E•S.?, ,r? >>d'.✓,; ,' �;. � ':+:8•:•:d .}.J,.;>:{Er: :dS. . ..R•o. .•: •, ..>. .:•:.-....+ .r.;.>; ,Srn n�.:!r7�r••.•y?�n,., .JF 'C4f�•{+.,F c o• ,•l•,�•;{I:{•}::d J::v J;{.yJf::•'• :N..>....•••••....4:✓h•!•:N... ••>... .Trr�R.:.4>V.•J., �.n_•G>'•}iC• �✓? _■- .%•J..••..•r 'Y.•.•....+ 4•<.•. •:>•+.. •?J.l'"• •}rfY:Yf:�J!✓l.. • •.,r.•'•:Y✓::h•:SY• • .•'Y•V.•.Gd•.•'.lr•.,;;.J'✓j•..,•,,I.�.fh>�•.G>•jV• t• •,'VA••,{>J .0•j: ..>4'•:d•:• !1}?{.. 4. �'�,y✓f.:•:. h n. ..>4•} .». .✓>> ..;S::vs... � n'�'fir,N?r�r ... •:..S,CC,Ta';.• _ .So. :v •;{•: ..:�"' :?p.{•}: .vlv 4r,,;;:}:•• .Y.rl:.K•f�'a{ •:S•»:•`•.o RIPTIMION ,+.r n;:;?u}�:a•••Fl.... ...1 . ..> •-wSv�->Z'-.'.4�e� �.v..•.•✓.v.•.•✓R•• '{ ..Y. ,r✓.r, ;-'f`.'�..A. •o ..Yi,`•"�•:;A:Srn s.•.-::-r.✓.>:3::v. •14ri�i:;enx,.T''v:v Yd>6a'. � .v.4•✓v.•Yrir• >.{$. ••�,rN.,Y;.v /.!{>.h, h .4.'yt2.. J,C•SY• n,:•-w,."""K<G •e ..Yd;. , ,✓.?.•.v.>.Yv�•. •;ti$• :4:;0: '••d;�•,>''':>••••FS= ,PZ*.YYL;.'�:Y{G:�d}��>v:Y:.'✓ <. .y' 'vy7:?.;,R'•V.•.•,:;r};!:•✓,? rG;F.,.�;r:M G. d;?.•••{•> ,:: ': y, '•t'+: '•rS;:''{:.'✓!c•.>r�''�-Y�b •1 •1 r a,., S:• : .•..•.•?::hd.:{.}•. >a•.•Y�w.d''4 : ;.>✓. ': QAK arq. .>;.\,•�?'};� ,�,•�' :<.�{�T:;�'•::4d d In•••::ata%L•'.w:�}Yi��:ti�'i y:�: �Z:;:L;>.�;:^{'fir{�};S•;}�,.,';1 Y,.E;d.;:; ®�- .. Y,.:•'+A•�S•`"E•a.[:: •dE•}�:{.:5{.J,•r:n;,Y.r d•S'{?is 4:•:;:yd;.}7Ci:{{ .........{yt,'! :':�'Y,,K!,�•✓{:O o>;:... 1„•;� •>♦-w,ill'*ivs>•Y c,• ';:.�i`nY:v:• '•'{.>✓:?;:;%l;t;Y!'•ti:{' {•S$a:•afi�{r•S:vS:••••>r•.•?:.v.:: .•N;$:,v>.:E{�?'{.•d�7,'�.4• c'Li♦ _®- S:tiE;:;tg-•'•:�'�e��'4 •.qr>.,,,> 't,;>;•v:.%'Z: '{:,.; J• Fd{::•:•'•s}S::'.•:i%fJ'E?•:;?;.4Er. ldr•,.';��af.•'r�.: '<b >N N•< _■- � �:�::: ,};:;:M:�.E:y�:y};• �?4'':',,: } }'% •it%d�:}:•E:SEti�::i>S:{{;r:;?:•::�:yE�:{�'•'�e�S:d::;r!:?;¢}°i �''�,'•Ge.. s � �'} :, •y{:? '4.:;.�F•-'t:•,: vA•. •• q ..5:•h;:,.S;.y!,;S�{{;• .,.d•..•r::>•: f:, OI .. °i$:• 7kvt v' {> .A Yd$- {d• :::;:$... };{,• ::1.•:.•:..•:yr F...:. � .'ram.•.•i::!.. ,> .�' k•' :',:. .JE•r;•• '•'G '% ~''!••:r{S:•?:"::•:}Y>;n;!'}.':••';•y'y'.,✓h y'{?:::g:A!' [•'••✓ 1 ?:. :;•.$ v}On:rG d"::•:•:. r>v••1•>.•.yr{;r 'd4 f.;•..•} ry EJiS ;.•• v • : ' •' t Ad.•••,,,,V' ♦' rV:r; d}:• 4 W:.nN h 1 1 'I . 0.>4. efi:•:;{• r {.n};r'<' ,;E,•' ,.c" v !�;: F:••':•hlf: :•.. r. >..r,. I •�.5:�::�::;:�����dc`+-e`'4 }.�::<?••• a�+v�r°✓S-�y',ti_;.�Z•r, :•iv�;,Z.-i--•'^�'Y•'}:,.<, .?:�.5;�!�:y:}}y�•: :}:;�:•:�'}�: S�SS:°{:'•',:}� A 'k•.•R!: .r ✓;.- •$?::>.• :h; ?}�,;;? -r'.a`'s_ •. •1'•:::'•+•,r•.•.•'v:.•:<•..•.•''••:✓ ?.4. b. N � �':$:;:,3;';:• ,.•!ri .;.w':f•_'f:1•.d•::v�•••,.• '!?..d.G::• '1;e7`Y.:;:y�.,+},•�Y,�Y•:-:;z•.'�!:n•'' •f:.•hvfdl{y}:J:''''''.•{:y.•.� ? ' {Y:;. •4; `:1'V,i,4�,*.!!.}c4E.,.'.'• YC�>"'J 'w-41' lT Sf .:�.:,:rV;;}:✓:.•.✓•F:; Jd;:d;h >•N. ! ?.�.••• n} .:; •f'i'. ♦ ':?3•:au r�:�5' ••?.• �•'? F.>?•..y. •.. ✓J ff1 v'fF.•. •'ray?, :p�{,{{:� :. 4•, -,, 4Yr:Y;.-o•;•P'�"�+•.Lr�`{? ..E1�:•;�'-•:a:�nW}'f,•t::;:a;,e,'.C:p•,:•,..? •�::'%t`°,.}�;{{:%:'• ! li'.• >'C?',.4 i��: r L•:.•:�•Lq�I: •'4%fy.,;.-a_ :c�+'..�"9�v{Y'A7�.•.l� .;;,Y;••. :•:h' { }';.•{Y{J,.•:.;•`Y%`•3�.r•:f�k: •;::;5}:,::;l.S;;k,Y,;??}3r ...•..:..•.v't•:Y'aWEST MAIN ST. • ,•f�,{�: .:,r,.: }:,?q'•E:? G kv�;;+.•:.•:4v?y�Y.�'� '.Lo}�:h:, Y d Y ''�'!'tY'°r",,; ✓ °v<���.�,♦�', {v.{: {S'i;:: ttrr :•:?;• .J;••};KS}5:;:••S.; �Y, ''-• 2< ,v`fo4tl:•. >. >: •'`,'•,r�'.� '>'d:v:.'• • !•},u, Pu��:;.}.. �?:•r, '•'°:}E'Yi�.'•d•}t?_ -''-:=i}.+:d;:={:;:R�:v.'{:•�::Y'rS•;.•,ti a;;t¢..:4i :m ♦!:� C %••4{;✓G.d .;}} '•:'•Y{4:$.,. .lf:•S n '¢Gs•.�•�.,. 4:f,.;.•.. w:.• ....•;,L+. «�����%• r..YL., E.�;:°;'>,'.vE <i};',•.S::f.•.•:�t{� ! .-4-.' f':.,�,,�:e E {;:d;}:S.•.':•'s:;:{v? �_.i v.'a.; ::.,%{:ti:•r f :y':•J '':?'?S:'} 'ty<'{S:E::.}`- doh•-`"'�`., .�.;�'• .............• !� :;:{C;?''' .y y..; .x.'. .>rab:E S:•:• ,4f.•rr?.•° ,+-� }:Y}y�;:;G:7}j✓} .•.'• -v•.k>•..v: o r�'}'tip. :.d> �.,.,.'4,.,.. k.::•• .. +:vi•.':1'Y--' _`• Y::;{:y::; 'y{�•.; r I `�/ .;},: }:fi''r'• }e.•.:;:::o"v,:E:JSrS:•:�°•'i'.:d:i}Y.ti:•},�S�°S{�:� '�jv:••;!r•;�,'},,. Ste'S>s,'{•"-?'�:''v .S•'v •:;$:•:':v:¢;:.};' .... .y.v'• J' 4N:.:,'•yJ..l.. :'`•`:.�;:, �i:;71.;.�.•_c�•.;-.S !:err��J • • H '���5;}ti:;ir,�'$fii:;:•?':�oY�:i��: ;�:•5:....•..}•.;.�e y'✓,:;... b:,v'�j �:_'4.�� • DPJ ::�:^., ;,., ^,+-.o:-^.,:.^\: .,{dl•• _ GS f �- T'✓'.�:• �.•..;•�,•.•.h+•a:•n w�1:� .n.•l l: ••,:{or:h: '•� - --• ;ULVE J• •:q••:::'?{.::•:.•rJl:::{J..•.4}v•:Y{•:.•.•. J.•:.J°%•rv::r, ''{�'1•1,el v: !✓Y.4{,:{ mal ! q• ;u •{:;:; I \•� r 1 r ma - e• �' -' - {�k•.•�.r-•vv!{:::?{•iY.�:};i:•t,' •S}y{S d•.4 �r�..} �_ [q(� ud;:;r, I I1 ��� ✓>4;✓,v E•.:•f.•ry.fr•'$•S.•.••••••Y, S 'ra•'•, .r 1 1�1 1 .r., s, i I' „1 ;�!ti:•. I' :dv.•?:•}:v.•.•.Edv'd•SSS•r:v.•..{;.E>.,�: �:•, L�:Gr!✓. J. \• rr� a� - _ * .rw... r. r.. I it A:i � \• i! 4� .�t,•�:w�_F:3i.::{'+>y+.:•'!• _h.e:✓1:::::y.•,';i � ?:E 'E:•.• •x•r:}�:•::?.•:•'r: :''%S.4E,.••.•.•.�:. "+1F•: 1 �• � � ,Eti::7 - • •.. . ny'%:v.>,k••• fY✓ 4.•r/ IN :' �: ry { F3 � I•�I!!1 ��' I > �>r•'hC,le:•• y�'.'�.-•' I o ,'G '.I�IOI G}>bF•d.F ..ti., ,�..•:4✓:ti{•ya'+'d! :?,J f. G!!1 1L �. :>Y:: J. '�•... f�:l'•:;• '�: _ I!!!!•:E.'r••'•:,::�•'4:' �:�4;:: ?r{?:}e{::� �L: E .•ti?� 1�1�11 F;:;:�: •.4{: Y,�Y� a.'. I°f. r.I�!!1. •. .G>hv 4••'.'." vY .FJ•. .. 1111151 `'o':• ��{pr >'f � r< ray:•. u•r "r,:E'•,rr re'1 Cry d "!!1 1 � � •lG F ! / YQ+.i.�1,,,r Fi 10111 it• � ♦4 .,r,:'d,•• ��•, Y � ®� I 1 v a ♦'a r•a ff I •� � ��C 7 •.`d,4My .w`y>•'•••,^n��`AG''`•.P-✓r,� it 1 a' � is .��1.�.. �� r. -- v' $ •S:•itc%:rJ. fY.S v r i rll ,r•a 1 r•a sr•a r••a .� 1. .}♦;::Ff,:::- 3 F:':••1 {y}.•. .,w• ;•';• •r rEC>' >, •e r.r r 11 r•ia 1 wa r•ia via b t`+'.. E I I � � � •��' 3 •'•a•{;S'r,'.J} ;?:•F��✓S�rmoor•» I v:a 1 r•a r•a I r•a tgq+:;.. . . ;{:'-'� .. .{,...•:.;.•;• !rJS"S>•'r s �0-0 0 MIT-, via 1.: r•ia y [� al!!!■ P� r < ! J4•Y'' 1• 1 vla 1 via r,a r•.a �` f,,{p`� 3 1•e r.r 1L el 1 via 11 v.a .1,.,via 1 r'ia ''�•�' I!!!I • 1!!!■ i 4%•; 'mac r! 4,> 4 r} rY <F.d I i .r• h• G%%;' >MY r41 c > is PENES •C.;:4 IlGl1�:.'L'!r`l�.'.4v.'••:r`':'•_ '••:•N ::%:i:?:}5;:�.;�:',`.°�� d,� .I!!!■ [�':,G 1 ;e,✓{lY.y�Cf`'G�'(•}. ���r©�©�©� : ■'■e • tamlm Mel amom � _Yr>� . -Yr Y✓J g y��>�� .,ytti,s, • _ .1 r'''r•'''y_ •A r�}Y`'f��•�,, ••'e •' ' Z✓,t r'u. I � / -� - - %!.. � ! I , .•.•} :%%v✓,4';:•<sy{i;r .��.''•'•y!•f'Y.'/'�,'�:y:J3-',� • I -' jI•:{!,��i�{7, •�1 fly}.,f.:.•.;;v;'•f�;';p •�nE;,�•�y�•'.�,ry�{g • 1 •• • o-• 1 Ile 'tJ$;. :;.;.;✓i: .;Sf,:�;.•'> :;4 T:';::;.;:{{;.vrff::.;�•.' •.�lr•.t > \ • •• e•1 \• • < - �:4'E:' ♦%:r°fir✓::. :!.r,.°j ���� y.G, ..Q� -=•a7:.- 5��.:v.•y.{v:G�: 'ra;S;,I{: � • • G:.�I�i`,:,i\r6 a%''SS'S�'• ::{ti}, • d:• 6.✓. �'1�I��■:'II�•:Y!:•r ••,E.•• r;..•�:•r .}v✓rrYFfe::rl:>. Y.{� '� y -✓:,, ••-sTvra�•T �je� r.: •.f,.,. .{};Crl.;1F••. r.••;h.'' •• r F{? / .. .< •: ;. 11}[[..,.� by Y:vh•.4•.vh•..•h>.. •o!. • Syfr .... 4• .r,•',✓ J,<,• f 1}}:rd•?I )p.44•n. /✓ >•:{• h. ..>•.N.•r:n•. .:1..�.':r . ..•:.?•.. :d�:•.... f::E:• >O• .�� :Fh. Y.. h»S{a;::•S.`ri� ✓. ..N.. lh.; ..,..�.{•r>Fj. .J.d�:::. {'I.•.. :?':•:{ti:11:;:;:::•:•:.•'i••:'::'::• ": .44'E .lPll {•• Nr••::H J ':•:.;:d•'d{VA:•?:•<..>•.ffi•:A' :}>'.•:•..::rr.{•'•:•;; {✓r.•:!!?rr: ':?:•• 1-1 Gti•:• :✓f.• •'F.✓!:. •::: ,{• ..v: ti.. .•:�•.: :�:> .h.>.... -::•:{d•:Er•}y ..S•4•Y... .Y� a yJ;•, > •••,\•d{>• .J• .AV.:•'•'F!:{::•.•rr.•. {.;:, 'fh•%••;•y•4.n. ;Id{!✓?:d•;•,:'•4A•'d1 • • -e 1 1 • • 1ui ia... ':::". •%• •.v .•.>};.• .•.v :'�C'$` :v:..• .h:............v✓:.•.•:f,EE•}};•?✓,r4dr•,•✓,drug}, .�... .fi.. .::•: ..•ir •f•:• ::�:•.•.v.•.•{1:d......?.v:!?{�'S:•...... :•'E:'!•r•4r....•. •':0i •:J:• -Y dv:•: 1 .;C, •.•r•.•:.v v.•n:E•.•.•f:.•v v... .a.. 1 .. ;}S•{•>:s'4� � {{%F%!E•:..h....... .nl....n•J:.•r:.•:.•J:.•d:•.•:: .n... •''?>:dY ES':{'.•'r,'!'? >'J'... ✓:�...... �j .h;• :tii•• .rr.....,....,. .{4Y•:rh.... ..✓.•.•lv•. ..✓ .Sy :�v;..4{'.};.;{:S:•'•:• •S:•:v:E•? .✓.},?,•>! vh F:: :•?;:; :;{t;.. �•:. •.•r •?}.......... ..>•:✓•.}Sr. •.v.:v.;.;.•{•:!$:�:>:6.dC:•... .;. .h... ••:N.> �.,' ...»�}:�:�5:: fly ••:ti SY.•:•S.Y..Y$... . .Yh .•E'•.'•S vo.�:::•.•.......r�. . ••d..:r:•:•.v::::......•.•y✓.'{:F' ri•;✓C�.....t -t�'� ..Y: .•.}..nh• :,� ..G.;:e,•:{g4:v:•:'•.n. .;Elr:•:•S?:E hE .:rF.•:%•:•S:•:•?r G:;;:,{�J�.>s•?: :::•v�u•:.i�:�':�h'r.,.F F.•:o'{{{{. Jv•.}. �'$.'u,.' y.•'s:�:•.vh>•S1}v?;.h•.v..,..J>.n..}.;• Ir' •vS:•••4:•:4:'b.:yE>•.••..:•..•n.•>r..h rr.4••v!..•}.:v:rE.o••r:EY •' ; r.> {O.?;;•..•v•;:::.r v??v!r..•:.. :1%3J,Ei.::•.;�:✓J:F a��e''•E`.•'�.'..•r.,�.5.�+{.•>�J • • •✓4 Y ....;Jv n.S • ..Ev:>•.•ly 4v.•.•�.y. fi'?F.J'•. { }r:. f:. :.Yy. .•.};; .•f.;•,•. '•t>'•::••S:4r 4!•},. .;•.vn.,• .r}W:: ••r••.•.•.•.•:?: :>: •rr?{;:::•'SJ: y.0'�•v•.4�: .>. ::•:�f•A..o.Y..!».. :•:•�...>.. el` .!. •Sn.' rf.•{:F; •.•h :J...4 .1.r. .1 • •: r •r :1:•r4. :;•.• {•}.dq: F�' .}4•:};: '':t •.•.•r.•.}'•:✓F::.•:x...... 1! .rJ.Jnw. .�..... ..t:. :;:tC >..�i: .r .vJ.•J.h >{•<,•;evv•.....Y.d{:Y.. :'.:>:St..� .:•r. I ✓JJ:..: .•::•r.• ��•', n,. Y C:4• ':: .� •.v:.. .4 4Y..n .v:.•.•n•{••q:$•• °.Y. .y'�$n}:.• '4'•?' �{{:: �'>�i<d3:•♦i :'•Igrr. .:v. :•:E•:•�:�:�:%•".•'�:}}f::Ed{c.l...r.•.•.•.. 4. .r.•:hv.•.•}:S. .✓.. '•�::; .Fl..., 2•:.•..•. 1 .f•• :4}>4• •h �:•r>;••N; 4dN 4•••!V:lJ.>'•rr:✓ .✓44N•.'}:. n .•?S:Y. .•r::.••h•.:v... .t✓J.r.fi h.....n.......... .h.....+...... :;:v d:�'•:•'f.•:•:•n•:•�'S•' •.•?d; .}•%•r:,.•"Od'%•:?, •/• '•. .• • 1 • ••• \ • .r 3c?s dy '••F• •:•�?;•: •rrh•{•rJ... •.v:. •.•.+'F.{.•:{vr. FM ovM �r�.• d: .r.h.rnev.>• .n .Y.-.2�•'�•.•>. a•:1-,••,vv �'i:• tea,•{¢$ ::{R'•}:J�}y.;{ 'SFS°ry.%:•?.•h.. .r.•r• •• rdfi.}:{✓rS?%• .n.G Yn:J•,r, ✓:::•'•:•:; t.;.,.i �@.� 'G: t:C?.� .:�. r•-Y•O{.. :J:{V N r✓:`.>'•". >'7.Y 'n• 4•Vr.' :••?rJ} !Ff'' •h• ;�fj,r�•Lf; •• i 1 1 1 •- Y G.h h•. .L.. � �:•'+.r .K r.dd•: r : S•"✓' ..?;Y• 5 .tih;s n r••S}•+ r.•f:o•?' r..wn v7v :'6id..d.•. ••..,�•r•:{� Y�'•: ._>i':r$:•Y.•' :.4 .,.. ho.•: •n•. ✓• {•hv 1•:•. :1 '?'iV:• >.},.• ✓v♦'�J• J• .r• :'ry>:::d'•,4 a>h i nt - ..G•�:••✓fi>n`eC> '.r ylfy ..! 4.. •kd e+Y r:;C: .GJ>. J'•�+".2Y{:>Y> :L>vrir ✓. r♦r'•..•?i,� w,r✓�C:Y :r•Av. v'r�:A.,• .r. .n YU S•?. i •:r v �Y ':•. f✓.' :ir'YF.�f.. . .>. >{•:• r. .fbr: Y9 q>c�• v. +� `>. n..>.•}n. ..r _ Y. .v..v..4.> nn'^'a J:::{d,.>}...•r✓.•♦•.k_'•1rL•�. rL: :d•'> 4 .•'.•f✓'-F F••,F,i: 1 a J!.• •:•. 4 v•G. > 7s•:>. �?.!7� ���♦♦ .C4 Y n w!:' (h:31�•✓r. l°I• L. ,,{r .4,.rf.•.••Y,•'FJ.> ✓. t>�J YR J f.�•r 'r.` 3.3. ! .✓.'��'�',..Yn� Y'E. './rJ .e'::5,?✓ v> .{.• •.•hr �.r ✓ n �,...+ ✓5:4•. .•A>r hY� . ✓. :•^f$: ;43rry' .•• y';:lr,. .5,:•>..r > •�d�S"r:•i;{,r. JI r.•Yv{..... . -?J,..-:•, 4 r,•,r,?e, { '.':E, - ✓ ✓v ., .,.t,. ,.,.,J •Jv{. Fy.?w.d:A✓rnFi hr• .r r.. :.•d�''+7 SAY`✓m✓i...,Rl' .. ,N.. G . .J.G• :sa::. v ._Cd+ S�,:J .G,o F w r. .-+•$S.4-11::.4i :�;♦}'J''f:��,d'ti•.';>S 4,vJ ' ✓•`K}•!.-'•'+C4 :'G. 1t•r'"Z'K✓d•• .': '%B`•}�sS'.•nr •.;Jrr,.vr4 .✓ .�``�• ilyd '{-a:'' Gy a..xs:• d.,_;nd- . �` �♦!r:L1•.�:k',{4w. 'Wr:�,.•a.......r•>13;�_l. .s_.�<r'��.?>-_'f:.> _•3!_. J, �:•-J.•F.� 1.�rO.♦t`•''w-„<`��''ct•_ � lisvF.'1 f. •a.•...2G. Sv.>•v. s.z _ ..� :�. l•?. ,:.L'�1.: _ L+;' _.� �� �4✓. -- - .>In•rv.. •J�.!: -.t id1v.4f_. d>Y. rv:-.wa.=w.._.__.,,�r.•�a__- r..•• �_ '.'r�->✓>>�.♦'.+_.Y'�•_!•�_ !cam✓ d�•J_. i ';-_� � pY.ti➢ d `es�..._.r` - --->- <- -- - - .•as•� r. �.� �� a�. �`•} v✓JJ°� �.✓!1•?4�.•rfr?;�z^'� ✓J..J'+G.•..,.�• .r.�; -,r✓'�•�' r. a ••s.• 'IT 1 r w' >v '' - �._--,:•.��yt;•;-7." .-�-�._.�.m. r•J vw:vn>,5•Jr ,r - `rt'��rr_, r�,sjtrf 'x/'4 Ys� r>. •D}�.F,'-°r�,'�lrJr.}'d�fa��2:Y1•-Qx{�`• ✓ r Y}- • '•} .r�r g� � �y.�•? �,gt� <^a'^'•' .r' •r fa .�'a'ar.'a'�v -:,.t.. r!� '�e�' R�•�>v^a♦.fi.•�T'��2�?��r"C'R•`-•:2'L• .'4. :�1+�-�rS•'r_.2'f�.'T•O�`�•'�c.�%`ia}'E�'�� :r�'t�.•a'•n.S�rJ7•�reG�'"}�r'�es--•Sr-.J.u.}L.�� f�ter J..�Y�`,d.C�v +..Y':L• .�� NARRATIVE rn r LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY PLAN NARRATIVE May 2005 Prepared By: ® MORRISON ID®E MAIERLE INC. • An Employee-Owned Company M M I #: 3373.003 TABLE OF CONTENTS NARRATIVE . 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................2 1.3 LARGE FORMAT RETAIL DISCUSSION....................................................................3 1.3.1 Economic Impacts ...............................................................................................3 1.3.2 Multi-Tenant Reuse .............................................................................................3 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT .....................................................................................4 3 SITE PLAN.......................................................................................................................27 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................27 3.2 SITE PLAN INFORMATION......................................................................................29 4 SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION.............................................................................................30 5 INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN...........................................................................................30 5.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN...................................................30 i 5.2 SEWER.....................................................................................................................32 5.3 POTABLE WATER....................................................................................................32 5.4 DRY UTILITIES.........................................................................................................33 APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPLICATION APPENDIX B TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX C DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND EASEMENTS; COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS APPENDIX D ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST APPENDIX E SCS SOILS ` APPENDIX F NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL PLAN APPENDIX G WETLAND INVESTIGATION APPENDIX H GRADING AND DRAINAGE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION i • • FIGURES AND DRAWINGS - VICINITY MAP - ADJACENT LAND USE MAP - REGIONAL COMMERCIAL EXHIBIT - TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS - BUILDING ELEVATIONS - VIEWSHED PERSPECTIVES - SCHEME A: SACCOCCIA PUD CONCEPT ANALYSIS - PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - LANDSCAPE PLAN - DRAFT COS • ii . 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION This narrative and supplementary documents represent the proposal for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse (Lowe's HIW) as the first phase in the Saccoccia Planned Unit Development (PUD). The vehicle proposed to accomplish the approval and construction of a large format retail store in excess of 75,000 square feet is the Planned Unit Development process. Large format retail establishments greater than 75,000 square feet are permitted as a conditional use through the PUD process as noted in Chapter 18.18 Commercial Zoning Districts, Table 18-1 Commercial Uses. The .proposed Lowe's PUD will overlay the existing Saccoccia PUD and provide additional development guidelines to promote a superior design. The Lowe's PUD will overlay the entire 39.99 acre Saccoccia PUD and encompass all three lots. The PUD Preliminary Plan depicts a detailed site plan for Lot 1, the Lowe's site. A schematic plan, Scheme A: Saccoccia PUD Concept Analysis, depicts integrated pedestrian and vehicular circulation, trail networks, and open space features for all three lots in the Saccoccia PUD and surrounding environment. Scheme A also conveys one of several possible development site plans for Lots 2 and 3. Detailed site plans of subsequent phases in Lots 2 and 3 will be prepared and submitted for review when these lots are developed. The Development Guidelines expand on the allowable • uses for Lot 3 to include medium to high-density residential development with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. This project also entails boundary relocation to fit the needs of the Lowe's Planned Unit Development. In conformance with the Saccoccia PUD, Lot 1 will remain as the dominant lot, Lot 2 will consist of a smaller lot adjacent to Tschache Lane and Lot 3 will align with Walton's Stream/Ditch and Baxter Lane. The Saccoccia PUD was filed without a first phase and it was assumed that boundary relocation would be necessary to secure lot'specific tenants. This narrative also addresses how the Lowe's project intends to comply with the governing planning documents. In particular, this project is expected to comply with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan, the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and the Development Guidelines of the Saccoccia PUD. Other documents, including the City of Bozeman Commercial Corridors Design Objectives Plan and a technical memorandum addressing large format retail impacts released by Economic & Planning Systems (2004), are addressed in relation to this project. • 1 Ln • • The purpose of this narrative is to demonstrate how the Lowe's PUD will mitigate impacts • caused by this development or provide evidence that the impacts either do not exist or do not apply to this project. Discussion on the reality of economic impacts, identification of multi-tenant reuse solutions (see LIDO 18.40.180.C.6), demonstration of excellence in architectural treatments and exemplary landscaping and development of trail corridors and public open spaces are important pieces of this submittal. Lastly, this document covers the ways in which this project meets the goals and vision of the governing planning documents. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Saccoccia PUD is an approved PUD located along the east side of the North 19th Avenue entryway corridor in the City of Bozeman. Specifically, the 39.99-acre tract is situated in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 1 of Township 2 South and Range 5 East, PPM. The site is located north of Tschache Lane, south of Baxter Lane, west of Walton's Stream-Ditch and slightly east of North 19th Avenue in Bozeman, Montana. Figure 1 and Figure 2, located in the Figures and Drawings Section of this report, depict a vicinity map and adjacent land use map, respectively. This document is organized to describe .the project, request relief from the large format retail • cap, discuss concerns about large format retail, and address project compliance and infrastructure phasing. Included in the appendices are documents and figures required for the Preliminary Site Plan and PUD submittal. The planned unit development process drives this project. The City of Bozeman's LIDO supports large format retail stores through the commercial zoning designation. The project's underlying commercial zoning district allows for the "approval of any use, except adult businesses and casinos, if approved as part of a planned unit development'. Through the PUD process the City Commission may grant relaxations with respect to the LIDO. The proposed project meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the UDO in several ways. Input from the City Commission and Planning Staff, gained through the Concept Plan phase, was incorporated into the preliminary design of the Lowe's Site Plan. This project warrants relaxation of the large format retail size cap through the use of exceptional design. The proposed landscaping for the Lowe's lot exceeds LIDO planning requirements by 200%. The planting sizes of the landscaping also exceed LIDO expectations. The proposed building elevations have been reevaluated and enhanced based upon input from Commission and Staff. The revised elevations now emphasize definition of multiple separate entrances and articulation of building mass, profiles, and surfaces, to present appearance of multiple separate in-line 2 buildings. The aggressive large pedestrian landscape entry parkways that separate the multiple smaller parking gardens are terminated at the separate building entrances. The revised elevations also include additional local materials such as rock and stone. The back and sides of • the building have been improved through the use of material variations and additional surface and profile design features. Building design and landscape features emphasize a pedestrian scale streetscape environment. 1.3 LARGE FORMAT RETAIL DISCUSSION 1.3.1 Economic Impacts The City of Bozeman has expressed concerns regarding the economic impacts of large format retail stores on other businesses and affordable housing. As a result, the City of Bozeman solicited the expertise of Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) to address economic and community impacts of large format retail stores. A technical memorandum released by EPS dated August 17, 2004 disclosed their preliminary findings. The report finds, "Based on our preliminary analysis, the fiscal impacts on the City associated with large format stores are estimated to be only marginally greater than those associated with a comparable amount of smaller store space." The EPS technical memorandum also reported that much of the economic impact of large format home improvement stores will be felt by other discounters including Wal- Mart and Target and that there was no rationale that large format retail affected affordable • housing more than a comparable amount of smaller store spaces. 1.3.2 Multi-Tenant Reuse Development of a renewal plan for abandoned stores is also an issue of concern for the City of Bozeman. The abandonment of a store occurs for two primary reasons. One reason is that the business opts to abandon one building to replace it with a newer building in a different location within the same community. A large format retail store is most likely to be developed within a Regional Commercial land use designation, as defined by the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. As shown on the Regional Commercial Exhibit located in the Drawings and Figures Section of this report, there are approximately 610 acres of designated regional commercial land with 393 acres, or approximately 64% already developed at this time. This developable regional commercial land is located almost exclusively within the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor. It is unlikely that Lowe's, or any regional store for that matter, would choose to relocate within the same corridor, thereby reducing the likelihood of an abandoned store for this reason. Often, large format retailers move out of a region or town when 3 an area suffers an economic downturn or if the business and its parent corporation are suffering • financially. However, with the North 19th Avenue connection between the interstate with the City center and the high development standards for this corridor, it is unlikely that this area of town will deteriorate to the point that the City will be left with a corridor of abandoned stores. Given the need to mitigate this phenomenon with a renewal plan, however remote the chance of this happening, Lowe's and their design team will provide a multi-tenant reuse plan to convert the store to other uses. The other cause of abandoned stores is bankruptcy, as seen with the closures of K-Mart across much of the country. This possibility exists, as with any business, but it is important to understand the location of the abandoned property. The North 19th Avenue Corridor is an extremely valuable area of the City and will most likely retain its value due to high development standards and because it is a primary arterial into the City center. Real estate in this corridor is increasingly unavailable and is too valuable to remain vacant for extended periods, especially considering the limited land within the regional commercial designation. As mentioned above, • Lowe's and their design team has developed a renewal plan that is intended to mitigate the abandoned store scenario. The proposed renewal plan outline is as follows: a. The renewal plan will be used as guidance in the event that the initial use of a building in the PUD is abandoned. b. The owners of the building will look first for a buyer or user that desires the entire building for a use compatible with the PUD. c. The second strategy will be to find a buyer or user that desires to demise the building for compatible multi-tenant reuse. The Lowe's building is of such a design that demising walls could be constructed along with lighting, heating and ventilation components adapted and modified as necessary for reuse. d. The exterior of the building(s) including landscaping and site features particular to the building subject to reuse will be maintained in a serviceable condition. 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT This section of the report follows the format of the Planned Unit Development Checklist. 4 • 0 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8 %" vertically bound document The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order.- a) Application forms All application forms for the planned unit development, site plan and subdivision exemption are included in Appendix A of this document. b) A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development The planned unit development will encompass three lots with Lot 1 as the first phase. The current landowner of the property is Philip Saccoccia, Jr. Upon approval of this project, Lot 1 ownership will be transferred to Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. The following is a list of involved parties of the Lowe's HIW Corporation: Chairman, President Robert A. Niblock • Site Development Manager Jack Mandel Real Estate Manager Mark Stoner The applicant for this project is Lowe's HIW. Lots 2 and 3 will remain under ownership of Philip Saccoccia, Jr until further development occurs. c) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy Due to this project's location, it is subject to a higher level of review than a typical commercial project. The site is subject to review requirements from each of the following: • The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan ■ The North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan ■ Unified Development Ordinance . o Chapter 18.30 - Bozeman Entryway Corridor Overlay District 5 0 0 o Chapter 18.34 - Site Plan Review • o Chapter 18.40.180 - Large Retail, Size Limitations and Design and Site Development Guidelines and Requirements ■ Commercial Corridors Design Objectives Plan In addition, this project is reviewed under the approved Saccoccia PUD. This project must conform to architectural, landscaping and signage guidelines of the PUD. For each of the above mentioned documents, relevant goals and objectives are compared to the proposed project. Beyond the relaxation of the large format retail size cap, this project complies with the goals of the City of Bozeman. This narrative also addresses the participation of the landowner with helping the City meet their goals and objectives. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Within the Bozeman 2020 Community Master Plan, the subject property falls within the area designated as "Regional Commercial and Services". As stated in the 2020 Master Plan, the City of Bozeman exists as part of a larger region and community. The Master Plan continues, "Often the scale of these [regional commercial] services is larger than would be required for just Bozeman... Because of the draw from outside consumers of these [regional commercial] services, it is necessary that these types of facilities be located in proximity to significant transportation routes." The Master Plan document recognizes that Bozeman serves a regional area and thereby, designated an area adjacent to a principal arterial for regional commercial development. The proposed Lowe's site is in compliance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Master Plan and its goals, objectives, and polices. The project complies with the adopted Regional Commercial and Services District land use designation for the site. The following bold text highlights various goals and objectives from the Bozeman 2020 Community Master Plan. Following each goal and objective is a response relating the compliance of this project. Community Character — 4.9.1 — Community Design — Create a community composed of neighborhoods designed for human scale and compatibility in which services and amenities are convenient, visually pleasing, and properly integrated and designed to encourage walking, cycling, and mass transit use. 6 0 0 Objective 3 "Continue the entryway overlay design review programs to ensure aesthetically pleasing development on major entrances into the community." Community Character — 4.9.4 — Public Landscaping and Architecture — Enhance • the urban appearance and environment through the use of architectural excellence, landscaping, trees and open space. Objective 2 "Encourage inclusion of plazas and other design features as public areas within developments." Compliance Measures: This project meets or exceeds the goals for community character as defined in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. Specifically, Chapter 4 for the 2020 Plan defines community design and public landscaping as goals for community character. The objectives of the goals are to continue entryway overlay programs and to encourage public areas within developments. This project adheres to entryway overlay planning documents including the Bozeman Community 2020 Master Plan, North 19tn Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan, and the draft Design Objectives Plan. Further, the Saccoccia PUD was approved in consideration to entryway requirements. The Saccoccia Development Guidelines meet the requirements of the governing entryway requirements for signage, landscaping and architectural design features. This project also includes a significant pedestrian/bicycle network with pods of public areas included throughout the site. One such pod is the "pocket" park located on the south side of the Lowe's store. This area is identified as Lowe's Green and is intended to include a small plaza and arbor that could accommodate seasonal outside displays and a gazebo type structure that would benefit trail users in this area. Large landscaped pedestrian entryways and community trails connecting to Baxter Lane and along Walton's Stream/Ditch are also part of the open space community character. Land Use — 6.6.1 — Create a sense of place that varies throughout the city, efficiently provide public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work, and minimize sprawl. Objective 1 "The land use map and attendant policies shall be the official guide for the development of the City and shall be implemented through zoning regulations, capital improvements, subdivision regulations, coordination with other governmental entities, and other implementation strategies." Objective 6 "Support infill development which respects the context of the existing development which surrounds it" 7 Land Use — 6.6.2 Centers — Designate Centers for commercial development rather • than corridors to encourage cohesive neighborhood development in conjunction with non-motorized transportation options. Objective 3 "Support and encourage compatible infill development to avoid sprawl and unnecessary public expense." Objective 4 "Provide for a limited number of carefully sited regional service centers which are appropriately sized and serviced by adequate infrastructure." Land Use — 6.6.4 — Natural Environment — Ensure adequate review of individual and cumulative environmental and aesthetic effects of development to preserve the view sheds, natural functions, and beauty which are a fundamental element of Bozeman's character. Objective 1 "Protect important wildlife habitats, and natural'areas which provide for beneficial functions, such as floodplains." Compliance Measures: The proposed project is a regional commercial business located in a regional commercial designated area. The regional commercial designation is designed for businesses that serve a multi-county region. The Community Plan goes on to state, "Often the scale of these services is larger than would be required for just Bozeman." This project meets the goal of the Master Plan to promote development that meets the designation of the land use map. The project will continue the infill process along the North 19th Avenue corridor. The site provides an efficient location in terms of access at the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane. The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan emphasizes the importance of locating facilities like Lowe's close to major transportation routes. The proposed Lowe's is located in a regional shopping area, which can consolidate multiple shopping trips. This project provides for pedestrian circulation between individual buildings to the west and Bridger Peaks Town Center to the south, encouraging one-stop shopping. The on-site pedestrian circulation system will be linked to public pedestrian facilities at North 191h Avenue, Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane and Walton's Stream/Ditch. The site is located in an area that provides for shopping or service stops while in route to other destinations in or out of town, which may result in reduced traffic. 8 • • The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan and the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan promote the development of regional commercial and service uses along significant transportation routes and promote through the PUD process, human scale design including open space, pedestrian enhancements and pleasing buildings. This project further meets the goals of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan by protecting important wildlife habitats and natural areas. The Walton's Stream/Ditch area will be protected by setbacks and enhanced through landscaping and the integration of a community trail. Economic Development — 7.6.1 — Promote and encourage the continued development of Bozeman as a vital economic center. Objective 1 "Support business creation, retention and expansion." Objective 2 "Coordinate the provision of infrastructure necessary to support economic development." Compliance Measures: The proposed Lowe's store meets the economic development goals and objectives as defined in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. This project clearly meets the objective • to support business creation in the City of Bozeman. This project will lead to a net increase in jobs in the Bozeman area. As stated in the technical memorandum released by EPS, "[The direct effects of] Large format stores, because of their size and sales volume, almost always generate a larger number of jobs than they displace." Further, it is likely that the jobs created by Lowe's may pay better than the local competitors. Within the major findings of this same memo is a statement, "However, there is insufficient evidence that large format retailers (as a group) pay lower wages than the average, and in fact the opposite may be true." On average, this project will create more, better paying jobs for the community. As a part of the City's objectives, business retention should be supported. The effect of large format retail home improvement centers on local hardware stores is explored in the technical memorandum released by EPS. The memo addresses Home Depot, which compares almost directly to Lowe's , "Although this store [Home Depot] will derive some of its sales from local hardware stores, much of the impact on this store type has already been felt from discounters, specifically Wal-Mart and Target. Therefore, Home Depot is 9 likely to derive much of its hardware sales from the discounters rather than local • independent merchants." As described in Objective 2 of 7.6.1, the City of Bozeman should support the infrastructure necessary for economic development in order to promote and encourage the continued development of Bozeman as a vital economic center. The support of this project by the City will allow for improvements to Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane and community trails at the developer's expense, thereby furthering the economic goals of the City by providing community improvements paid for with private dollars. Transportation — 10.8.1 — Transportation System — Maintain and enhance the functionality of the transportation system. Objective 2 "Ensure that the development review process shall coordinate development and transportation services so that the necessary facilities, such as pedestrian and vehicular travel ways, are provided concurrently with development." Transportation = 10.8.2 — Ensure that a variety of travel options exist which allow safe, logical, and balanced transportation choices. Objective 3 "Reduce the impact of the automobile by supporting land use decisions that can decrease trip length of automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation." Compliance Measures: The proposed Lowe's store considered transportation needs and met the goals of the Bozeman 2020 Master Plan by incorporating automobile and bicycle/pedestrian routes concurrent with development. This store also works to reduce the impact of automobiles by locating in a commercial area of town and, thereby, encouraging one-stop shopping for consumers. Consumers have the option of parking at Lowe's and walking to Bridger Peaks Town Center, Montana Furniture or Old Chicago Restaurant. This project is an infill project, which helps to encourage one-stop shopping. Improvements to Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane will be made concurrent with development of the PUD. Unified Development Ordinance Commercial Zoning Districts Chapter 18.18 and Table 18-1 Compliance Measures: 10 • This project is an allowable use within the City of Bozeman's commercial zoning districts. The proposed project is located in commercial zoning designation B-2. Included in Chapter 18.18 is Table 18-1 that itemizes allowable commercial uses. The table states • that "any use, other than adult businesses or casinos, may, through the planned unit development process, be approved". The City Commission has the license to approve this project. Bozeman Entryway Corridor Overlay District Chapter 18.30.020 Intent and Purpose "There are several arterial corridors entering Bozeman that introduce visitors and residents alike to Bozeman. The visual attributes of these roadways provide a lasting impression of the character of Bozeman. It is the intent and purpose of this chapter to ensure that the quality of development along these corridors will enhance the impression and enjoyment of the community both by guiding development and change that occurs after the adoption of the ordinance codified in this title, and by stimulating and assisting, in conjunction with other provisions of this title, improvements in signage, landscaping, access and other contributing elements of entry corridor appearance and function." Compliance Measures: This project meets or exceeds the intent of the Entryway Corridor Overlay district through the creation and approval of the Saccoccia PUD. The Lowe's PUD has expanded upon and enhanced the approved Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines with regards to landscaping, community trails and other contributing elements of the project's appearance. The Development Guidelines, which are used as a guideline for the first phase, shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman. The project also meets design criteria as defined for the entryway corridor. The reader's attention is directed to the detailed landscape plan. This proposal displays a higher level of design than comparable projects of a similar nature to demonstrate the seriousness of the Applicant and Landowner to develop a superior project. North 191h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan This project is in compliance with multiple goals in the North 19th Avenue and Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. In paraphrased form, the five goals of the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan seek to: 11 • • 1. Promote North 19th Avenue and Oak Street as major entryways that • exemplify the importance of urban open space. 2. Protect and establish parks, open space and sensitive lands in the corridor. 3. Provide for sensitively planned business and commercial parks. 4. Protect existing and planned residential areas from conflicting land uses. 5. Provide orderly growth of public infrastructure. Accompanying objectives and policies further refines each of these goals. Rather than going through the entire list of objectives and policies, the following objectives have been selected, because of their applicability to this site, to illustrate that the project is in compliance with the corridor master plan. Goal #1, Objectives a., c., d. and e. (again paraphrased) Encourage aesthetically pleasing entryways while avoiding typical strip development, encourage high quality business park areas along Interstate 90 and protect view sheds and environmentally sensitive lands. Compliance Measures: The location of the Lowe's building will enhance the existing development patterns. The view sheds are preserved through the use of landscape buffers at the property lines, interior parking garden landscape areas, and a small scale commercial structure on Tschache Lane, screening the parking areas. The future Hilton Hotel, the Old Chicago Restaurant and Montana Furniture Galleries screen the front of the store and parking areas from North 19t' Avenue. An aggressively landscaped island along the west boundary of the Lowe's parcel also screens the building and parking areas. All sides of the building are landscaped with specimens 25% larger and in greater numbers than required by the UDO, creating as aesthetically pleasing pedestrian environment. The entire site is visible from North 19th Avenue, Baxter Lane and the surrounding private lands. The community has addressed this concern by establishment .of the entryway corridor regulations, which apply to the site. The most distinctive view across the site into the surrounding area is the view east towards the Bridger Mountain Range and south towards the Gallatin Range. The parapet heights of the buildings are set at a maximum height of 29 feet. The peak element of the Lowe's entrances is set at 48 feet 12 to emphasize the entry points and to provide contrast to the look of the structure, not unlike the surrounding mountain peaks. • An environmentally sensitive area on site, the land adjacent to Walton's Stream-Ditch, is proposed for open space and a community trail system. This area too will receive landscape treatment. Goal #2, Objectives b., and c. (paraphrased) Establish linear trails, open space corridors and protect environmentally sensitive lands by incorporating them into design schemes. Compliance Measures: An open space corridor with community trails is proposed along Walton's Stream-Ditch. This corridor will logically connect with the adjacent Bridger Peaks Town Center. Further, it will connect Tschache Lane with Baxter Lane. The proposed community trails in the corridor are integrated with the pedestrian circulation system within and around the project site. Goal #3, Objectives a., b., and c. (paraphrased) Promote sensitively planned clustered commercial/industrial development that will provide Bozeman and area shoppers a variety of choices. Compliance Measures: The project adds to the cluster of buildings that currently exist. Within immediate proximity to the Lowe's building are Bridger Peaks Town Center, Montana Furniture, Old Chicago Restaurant, Bozeman Chamber of Commerce, Mountain West Bank and the future Hilton Hotel. This project will connect these commercial enterprises with a community trail network that is complimented by significant landscaping. Goal #4, Objectives a., b., and d. (paraphrased) Protect historic resources in the area and protect existing and proposed residential neighborhoods from commercial and industrial impacts. Compliance Measures: There are no historic buildings, sites or districts on site or on adjacent lands. All surrounding land ,has been developed, or is proposed to be developed as commercial, 13 0 light industrial or compatible mixed use projects. Currently there are undeveloped lands to the east and a smaller parcel to the south. Goal #5, Objectives a., b., and c. (paraphrased) Promote the orderly development of infrastructure in accordance with capital facilities planning. Compliance Measures: The proposal will promote and compliment the logical extension of infrastructure. It will dedicate and establish the rights-of-way for Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane, as suggested by the corridor master plan. Infrastructure improvements are planned for Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane as part of this development. Community trails are also being developed with this PUD. Commercial Corridors Design Objectives Plan The Commercial Corridors Design Objectives Plan, recently released in October 2004 as a draft update, provides guidelines to ensure the design objectives for specific entryway corridors. Within the document, the North 19th Avenue and Oak Street corridor is specifically addressed. The applicable guidelines for this project as outlined in the Design Objectives Plan are paraphrased as follows: 1. Existing agricultural site features and/or resources should be integrated into a newer development when feasible. 2. Create a "green edge" along the front of the property. 3. Minimize the impact of parking lots. 4. A detached pedestrian and bike boulevard trail shall be provided in the setback. 5. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and between projects. 6. Wood and masonry for exterior wall finishes are encouraged in this corridor 7. Streetscape elements such as street trees, simple furnishings, bicycle facilities, boulevard..trail connections, and planning for transit stops, are appropriate in this corridor. 8. Sign types, such as low monument signs and building mounted signs, are appropriate • in this corridor. 9. Sign design attributes should not disrupt mountain views, should have subdued lighting and colors, and should be aggregated with other signs. 14 Compliance Measures: The proposed project exceeds minimum landscape requirements with much of the • landscaping placed at the perimeter of the various parking areas. This building in particular is visible from Interstate 90, North 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane. To address these multiple vantages, heavy landscaping is incorporated throughout the site and building massing is designed to create interest and variety. There are no existing agricultural resources to preserve besides Walton's Stream/Ditch, which will be preserved and enhanced with a trail and landscaping. Lowe's has committed to installing landscaping that is significantly more than required by the UDO/ PUD process. These improvements are itemized as follows: INCREASED SIZES a. Plant sizes along the rear of the building will be increased by 20 to 25% b. 25 Spruce and Pine will be planted at 10 feet tall (required is 8') c. 12 Elms will be increased from 11/2" caliper to 2"b&b's d. Plant sizes along the west buffer strip will be increased by 20 to 25% e. 24 Pine will be upsized from 8' to 10 feet at installation • f. 13 Maples will be increased from 11/2" caliper to 2"b&b's g. 45 Cotoneaster will be upsized form 18-24" to 2-3 feet tall at planting INCREASE NUMBERS — the landscape plan is providing the minimum of 15 points through the planting of groups along the south, east and west yards, and exceeds these standards by 200%. The design philosophy was to follow N. 19th Avenue entry corridor planting numbers that were in effect when Bridger Peaks Town Center was developed. These quantitative standards were lost in the U.DO. In the spirit of keeping and exceeding the standard set by existing neighboring developments, Lowe's is proposing the following plantings above those required. a. Within the parking and building area an extra 12 large canopy trees, 149 deciduous and evergreen shrubs and 8 large non-canopy trees have been provided. b. A streetscape feel with lighting, trees, trellis work and hanging baskets has been created along the building front. • 15 c. Entry plantings at the two access points along Baxter Lane have been • provided. d. Entry plantings at the first two access points on Tschache have been provided (plantings at the east entrance are counting as plant groups for the east side). e. 14 large canopy trees along the north internal drive are additional. f. 5 large trees and 39 shrubs are extra in the west buffer planting. g. Along the south, 11 large non-canopy trees and 29 small ornamental trees are additional to the required groups. Total plantings above the minimum requirements are: 43 large canopy trees, 20 large non-canopy trees, 29 small ornamental trees, 9 evergreen trees, and approximately 344 shrubs. In terms of plant grouping this would equal 64 extra groups (a total of 46 groups are required). Similar to the small pads in front of the parking areas at Bridger Peaks Town Center, the parking areas for this project are buffered from North 19th Avenue by Montana Furniture, Old Chicago Restaurant and the future Hilton. Landscaping is incorporated throughout the parking area, along the western boundary and with multiple aggressive large • pedestrian entry parkways that terminate at the multiple building entrances. This project provides community trails within the greenway setback and connects the site with adjacent uses. The paths are integrated into the overall landscape design and are designed to be meandering and informal. The design also includes street trees and simple landscape furnishings. Should the City deem it necessary in the future, this project is prepared to incorporate a transit stop along the interior access road. The signage requirements spelled out under guidelines #8 and #9 of the Design Objectives Plan match the signage guidelines in the approved Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines The proposed signs shall comply with the existing Saccoccia PUD Design Guidelines. Further, the Lowe's HIW PUD Design Guidelines will incorporate many of the design elements set forth by the Commercial Corridors Design Objectives Plan. Saccoccia PUD The proposed project will meet the requirements set forth in the Saccoccia PUD. The landscaping plan as proposed exceeds the minimum requirements of the Saccoccia 16 PUD, and LIDO. These enhancements will be incorporated into the Lowe's site to further emphasize the project aesthetics and will increase the Lowe's PUD performance points. • This project will create the Lowe's HIW PUD, which will overlay the Saccoccia PUD. Upon approval of this project, both planned unit developments will overlay the entire 39.99 acres. The creation of the Lowe's PUD will allow for far more control over the design and construction of this project. d) Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas Open space will be allocated throughout the development within each lot and will not be created as a separate parcel. Provisions in the conditions, covenants and restrictions (CCRs) will allow for shared public areas such as benches, community trails and enhanced park areas. e) Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the planned unit development Ownership of Lot 1 will be transferred to Lowe's HIW pending approval of this project. Philip Saccoccia, Jr., the landowner of Lot 2 and Lot 3, intends to eventually sell Lot 2 and Lot 3. The City of Bozeman will have the opportunity to review Lot 2 and Lot 3 through the Site Plan review process. f) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial uses The Lowe's store will employ 150 to 200 full and part-time employees. Approximately 20% of the employees will have part time positions. g) Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant The proposed project was designed with consideration to the objectives of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan, the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and the Development Guidelines of the Saccoccia PUD while at the same time preserving the viability of the businesses that will locate on this site. Views into the primary parking areas are muted by perimeter 17 landscaping, interior landscape islands, mounding and buildings on the periphery. The • smaller Lot 2 pad, in combination with Old Chicago, the Hilton and Montana Furniture, aid in masking the parking areas from North 19th Avenue. Future development of Lot 3 will mask the parking areas from Baxter Lane. Significant architectural features have been incorporated into the Bozeman Lowe's store to create a pedestrian scale streetscape environment through the enhancement of the features supporting each of the three entrances.. In addition, landscaping provided for this site is purposefully designed to go above and beyond the City of Bozeman requirements. h) Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090, BMC. The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described The City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance Chapter 18.400.180.A.1. limits the maximum retail building size to 75,000 square feet. The proposed Lowe's store indoor footprint is 134,563 square foot. Including the partially covered garden center, the total area is 165,765 square feet. This application requests that relief from this size limitation be granted as a permitted use in a commercial zoning district. The UDO does allow for the proposed use if sited within a commercial zoning district, provided the use is proposed as part of a PUD, as this project is. Table 18-1 of the UDO states that "any use, except adult business and casinos, approved as a part of a planned unit development subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.36, BMC may be permitted." The following discussion addresses the criteria for "all development" in Section 18.36.090, BMC: All land uses within the proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against and comply with, the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory "All Development" group. The proposed project adheres to the criteria outlined in this section. The project complies with all City design standards and preserves natural vegetation through the integration of open space and wetlands. The site plan is designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development. The site is planned through the application of 18 "new urbanism" concepts including placing larger structures near the center of the development with smaller buildings outlining the perimeter of the development to aid in shielding the parking areas from view. The Lowe's parking area is broken into smaller • pods of parking through the use of larger landscaped parking garden islands. Pedestrian connections are made throughout the development including along Walton's Stream/Ditch and through the landscaped parking islands. A larger, landscaped open area, referred to as Lowe's Green, will provide a people place for shoppers and trail enthusiasts. The Lowe's building is aligned with Bridger Peaks Town Center for continuity and is situated behind existing smaller pads including Old Chicago, Montana Furniture and the Hilton. The conceptual layout for Lot 3 involves integrating the Walton's Stream/Ditch and open space with the proposed buildings into the layout. Landscaping for this project is double the requirements of the Bozeman UDO. Energy use and reduction is addressed in part j of this section. Orientating the Lowe's building behind the smaller out parcels provides screening from North 19'h Avenue. The placement of buildings along Baxter Lane also provides a buffer. Extensive landscaping is placed throughout the PUD and the Lowe's lot to provide another level of buffering. The proposed Lowe's HIW Planned Unit Development is designed to properly integrate into development and circulation of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods such that this PUD will not become an isolated "pad" relative to adjoining developments. The project aligns with Bridger Peaks Town Center to the south with community trails and accesses connecting the two developments. The project is tied to*the east via improvements to Walton's Stream/Ditch corridor. The proposed Lowe's development blends well with development to the west, including Old Chicago, Montana Furniture and the Hilton Hotel, by emphasizing the "new urbanism" style that includes smaller pads surrounding a larger pad. The proposed project provides open space that enhances the overall aesthetic quality of the project. The open space is thoughtfully placed to enhance the buildings, provide interconnected pedestrian circulation and to create a cohesive development. Per the suggestion of Planning Staff, the southwest corner of the PUD is proposed as open space with heavy landscaping to create a focal point for people on North 19'h Avenue and Tschache Lane. "Lowe's Green" combines a community trail, landscaping, and park .features for public enjoyment. The Green is located adjacent to-the* Lowe's Garden 19 Center. Significant open space and landscaping is also placed alongside the Walton's Stream/Ditch. The trail along this water feature will span the eastern boundary of the development and will eventually tie into a larger trail system to the south. This project provides at least 30% open space in the form of stream setbacks, greenway setbacks and other open space. Planned unit developments are reviewed based upon performance using a point system. At a minimum, a PUD must provide 20 points and an entryway PUD must provide 30 points. The proposed Lowe's HIW PUD goes above and beyond the required points by providing points in excess of the minimum 30 required. The open space points provided is approximately 38.6 points. The points are calculated by identifying open space within the project site. Extra points are awarded for open space areas considered public, which include the open space/trail systems along the project boundaries, the Lowe's Green and the focal point park in the southwest corner of the development. Points can also be earned by providing affordable housing opportunities to the community. Mr. Saccoccia's monetary contribution to the City of Bozeman's affordable • housing industry is in the form of discounted land price and a purchase credit grant to the developers of Bridger Peaks Village, a 120-unit affordable housing project situated on Oak Street. Mr. Saccoccia sold the land to the developers of Bridger Peaks Village in the Oak Street corridor for the purpose of providing affordable senior and handicapped housing. As part of this transaction Mr. Saccoccia discounted the price of the land by $350,000 and provided a purchase credit grant of $200,000 for a total contribution of $550,000 to the affordable housing project. The discounted price is based on comparable prices at the time of the transaction. Bridger Peaks Village would not have been possible without his actions supporting this project. While difficult to quantify the number of points earned by his actions, it is clear that Mr. Saccoccia has promoted the Housing Objectives of the Bozeman 2020 Community Master Plan: Objective 2 "Provide an adequate supply of affordable housing and land for-affordable housing." Objective 7 "Support infill development and the preservation of existing affordable housing and encourage the construction of additional affordable housing in new infill developments." 20 It is also requested that the City take into account the participation of the landowner, Philip Saccoccia, with the construction of improvements, ahead of development, which the City of Bozeman has benefited from. Mr. Saccoccia has diligently participated in an • array of infrastructure improvements in the North 191h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor. During the early 1990's, North 19th Avenue, between Oak Street and Baxter Lane, was constructed using an SID with the City of Bozeman counting the SID dollars as a portion of their match in obtaining Federal funding for the North 19th Avenue/Interstate 90 interchange. Mr. Saccoccia and Mr. Don Cape were the only participants in the SID that constructed a half mile of 3-lane arterial that the city and region continues to benefit from. In 1997, Philip Saccoccia, in conjunction with Don Cape and Jerry Perkins, orchestrated the installation of the Cape, Saccoccia, Perkins water main. The water main tied together two different water sources and three different pressure zones to serve this region of the City. The system was the first step in extending water to the north of Baxter Lane through an SID. In 1998-99, Mr. Saccoccia, together with three other landowners, the US Postal Service and the City of Bozeman, participated in a second round of improvements to North 19th Avenue between Oak Street and Baxter Lane. The project consisted of widening the existing three-lane arterial to a 5-lane arterial and signalization of the intersection of Oak Street and N. 19th Avenue and the design of the signal at Baxter Lane. The Baxter Lane signal was subsequently built with . MDT/City urban funds. These items are addressed such that this request is considered from the global perspective in regards to Mr. Saccoccia's involvement with the community and the City of Bozeman. The following discussion addresses the criteria for "commercial" in Section 18.36.090, BMC. The proposed project will adhere to uses defined in the previously approved Saccoccia ECCR's, which do not include adult businesses. The Lowe's PUD is contiguous to North 19th Avenue, Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane and will have adequately controlled access. As stated previously, the total project size is 39.99 acres with the Lowe's lot at 15.93 acres. It is proposed that this project allow multiple uses, as indicated in the Saccoccia ECCR's. In addition, it is proposed that this project allow high density residential. It is believed that this project may accommodate varied uses through the high level of quality of the project. The extensive landscaping and community trail network are conducive for 21 many uses. In addition, the Lowe's Green and Walton's Stream/Ditch tie the project • together and will provide common areas for consumers, employees, and residents. This project is compatible with the unique character of Bozeman. The Lowe's PUD Development Guidelines are crafted in the Bozeman flavor. The landscaping is reflective of vegetation typical of Bozeman. The architectural guidelines are geared to incorporate materials and styles that blend in with the character that defines Bozeman. The Development Guidelines are located in Appendix C of this report. Internal access is provided and is shown on the Site Plan located in the Figures and Drawing Section of this report. Internal private drives link Tschache Lane, Baxter Lane and the development to the west. This project is located in an area with compatible zoning and land-use within City limits. Development has occurred to the immediate north, west and south with development planned to the east. The compliance of this project with the Growth Policy is discussed in Section 2.1.c of this report. The Lowe's PUD also provides outdoor recreational areas for the public's use and enjoyment. The entire PUD will have trails throughout the site and along the perimeter of the project. The trails are enhanced by extensive landscaping and by placement near to the Walton's Stream/Ditch water feature. The Lowe's Green will include a resting area and extensive landscaping. Wide, linear parking gardens are located within the parking area to create enjoyment for users of this development. i) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character are being avoided or mitigated The proposed project is in compliance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan and North 19th Avenue Corridor Master Plan, which identify the land use for this property as regional commercial. The adjacent properties are of like use and conflicts have not been identified. j) Statement of the design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., • home/business utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling) 22 The mix of proposed and potential uses within the project and pedestrian circulation considerations will encourage one-stop shopping thereby reducing energy consumption. Building construction will be conducted in accordance with Bozeman building codes and • standards appropriate to this climate for insulation thereby minimizing building heating and cooling costs. Skylights are proposed for the Lowe's building and are encouraged by the design guidelines, taking advantage of the sunny Bozeman climate to reduce lighting costs. k) A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase/ Required Improvements Lot 1 • Regional detention pond. ■ Storm Water infrastructure for Lot 1, north-south access drive and to regional detention pond. Stub out storm water infrastructure to Lot 2. ■ North-south access drive with curb and gutter. ■ Sanitary sewer from Baxter Lane, extend south along north-south access drive and into Lowe's lot. Stub out services to Lot 2 and Lot 3. ■ Looped water main from Tschache Lane to existing water main along western property boundary. ■ Lot 1 parking lot improvements, including landscaping and lighting. ■ Trail system along Walton's Stream/Ditch ■ Improvements to Baxter Lane from North 19th Avenue to the eastern property line of the Saccoccia PUD. ■ Improvements to signal at Baxter Land and North 19th Avenue. ■ Extension of Tschache Lane to just east of the north-south access drive. ■ Temporary cul-de-sac at the end of Tschache Lane. ■ Stub out sewer service from Tschache Lane to Lot 2. • Landscaping along Walton's Stream/Ditch and access points to PUD. ■ Lowe's Green. 2 ■ Extend water, sewer and storm water infrastructure within Lot 2. ■ Lot 2 site improvements pera roved future Lot 2 Site Plan. 3 ■ Extend Tschache Lane with a cul-de-sac at eastern property boundary. ■ Extend water, sewer and storm water infrastructure within Lot 3. ■ Lot 3 site improvements per approved (future) Lot 3 Site Plan. ■ Add additional access curb cut off of Baxter Lane to Lot 3. 1) One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8 %-by 11-inches or 11-by 17-inches size A reduced version of the Preliminary Site Plan and Scheme A: Saccoccia PUD Concept Analysis are included in Figures and_Drawings Section of this report. 23 • 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: notations of ownership; proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls and other landscaping; attorney's or owner's certificate of ownership. The Site Plan and Landscape Plan identify property ownership. The Landscape Plan details perimeter treatment including landscaping along the boundaries of Lot 1 in addition to landscaping at Walton's Stream/Ditch and the access points to the development. 3. Viewsheds: a) looking onto and across the site from areas around the site, describe and map the view and vista from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site, b) describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent off-site locations. • Two viewsheds, or perspectives, are included in Figures and Drawings Section of this report. The Southwest Perspective is viewed from Tschache Lane and North 19th Avenue and includes the front elevation and the garden center elevation. The Northeast Perspective is viewed from Baxter Lane and the north-south access drive and illustrates the north and rear elevations of the building. 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street Street cross-sections for the north-south access drive and improvements to Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane are included in Figures and Drawings Section of this report. Baxter Lane will be upgraded from North 19th Avenue to the eastern property line of the Saccoccia PUD. Tschache Lane will be extended to the immediate east of the north- south access road and will terminate with a temporary cul-de-sac. 5. Physiographic data, including a description of hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended • construction and landscaping; locate and identify the ownership of the existing wells or well sites within 400 feet of the site. 24 According to information received from the NRCS, three soil types are found on this property. They are the Enbar loam, Blackdog silt loam, and Saypo silt loam. • The Enbar loam soil brings severe limitations to development due to its high water table, and potential for flooding and frost action. The Blackdog silt loam brings slight limitations to development because of its low soil strength and its potential for frost action. The Saypo silt loam has moderate to severe limitations to development due to its high moisture content and its susceptibility to shrink-swell and frost action. The typical soil profiles provided by the NRCS for this site generally correspond with an Independent geotechnical investigation performed on an adjacent site (Report of Geotechnccal Investigation to Lowe's H/W, for Lowe's H/W, Maxim Technologies, Inc., 2002). Physical constraints to development on these soils are fairly typical throughout the Bozeman area. Through the use of accepted engineering practices, all of the limitations described for this project have been dealt with successfully on past projects. Typical mitigation efforts for these soil characteristics shall include: . • Adherence to specific foundation design criteria to be identified in the geotechnical investigation findings. Criteria shall include provisions for pier/footing design by a professional engineer based on site-specific soils information. • Design of storm water drainage facilities that consider different soil types, plant species, and the potentially shallow water table. Additionally, specific design consideration is given during the stream/ditch corridor design. • Design of all streets using accepted engineering practices to determine structural sections and the use of separation fabrics based on soil.conditions and traffic requirements. • Use of well points to dewater the site during construction to insure that underground utilities, building foundations and pavement structural sections are constructed properly to prevent settlement or failure. Seasonal high water table depths are estimated to be greater than 6.0 feet for the • Blackdog (50B) formation; and from 2.0 to 3.5 feet for both the Saypo (506A) and Enbar 25 (509B) formations. These estimates are reasonably consistent with depths logged by • Maxim (2002) as well as from July 1993 to July 1997 (Final Phase Remedial Investigation Report, Bozeman Solvent Site, Nicklin, Earth, and Water, Inc., Feb 1998) on adjacent sites. Groundwater is likely quite shallow (i.e. 2.0 to 3.5 feet, seasonally) over a majority of the northeast portion of the proposed site. Both above-mentioned investigations utilized monitoring wells in close proximity to the site of concern in this report, and should therefore offer representative groundwater characteristics. According to the Groundwater Information Center (GWIC), only one well exists within 400 feet of the site. This well is a monitoring well with a GWIC id: 149396. The Nicklin, Earth, and Water, Inc. report shows seven wells in the near area (M-5, 6,17,18,21,22,3B), while the Maxim Technologies, Inc. report has three drill holes (DH-1, 2,3) just to the south of the site. Both reports estimated the groundwater hydraulic gradient direction to the north across the site. 6. If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions, shall be submitted • This project does not involve platting; however, a certificate of survey (COS) will be prepared to realign boundaries for the proposed project. A draft of the certificate of survey is included in Figures and Drawings section of this report. 7. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development A traffic impact analysis has been prepared with the report text included in Appendix B. 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is under question, the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing a thorough consideration of the proposed,planned unit development. At the time of Preliminary PUD and Preliminary Site Plan submittal to the City of Bozeman, no additional impact studies or other plans have been requested by the City of Bozeman Commission. • 26 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association), BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application. • This project will utilize the Saccoccia Easements, Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (ECCR's) including Property Owners Association already on file for this property. Additional ECCR's will be developed during the review process. A copy of the approved ECCRs and proposed Development Guidelines are included in Appendix C.. 3 SITE PLAN 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION General information requested on the Site Plan Checklist is presented on the Preliminary Site Plan and in this section. This section is formatted to follow the Site Plan Checklist. 1. Location map, including area within one-half mile of the site An Adjacent Land Use Map, labeled Figure 2, is located in the Figures and Drawings section of this submittal 2. List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76, BMC An adjoining properties owners list along with an adjoining property owners list certificate are included in Appendix D. 3. A construction route map shall be.provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site. Construction traffic will access the site off of Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane. Construction traffic will avoid private through streets from adjoining developments. 4. - 12. Site Plan general information. Information requested from items 4 - 12 .is found on the Site Plan located in the Figures and Drawings Section of this report. 13. Information required by Section 18.78.060.L. (streets,roads and alleys) 27 • • • It is anticipated that much of the road and community trail improvements associated with the PUD will be installed with the first phase. Specifically it is anticipated that Baxter Lane will be improved from North 191h Avenue to the east boundary of the PUD. The road will be designed to collector standards as defined in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan Update. Tschache Lane will be continued past the last access drive and will be built to the same standard as the existing Tschache Lane adjacent to this project. Further, the interior road that connects Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane will be built in its entirety. This project also entails a community bike/pedestrian trail network. The trail will consist of an 8-foot asphalt path located within building and stream setbacks and open space areas. Trails are planned along Tschache Lane, Baxter Lane and Walton's Stream Ditch. For the first phase, trails/sidewalks will be installed along the entire Tschache Lane frontage, Walton's Stream/Ditch and the west side of the interior road. The build-out of the trail/pedestrian walk along Baxter will be installed with construction of Baxter Lane improvements. Pedestrian islands will be constructed leading up to the Lowe's building • through the parking areas. Connections throughout the Lowe's site will be installed. Dust control, pollution and erosion will be addressed within the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be completed for this project. The SWPPP will contain temporary and permanent best management practices (BMPs). In addition, Lowe's HIW requires an internal SWPPP to be prepared in accordance within their strict guidelines. Traffic generation and capacity are addressed within the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) preformed for this site. The TIA report is included in Appendix B of this document. Full versions of the TIA, including supplemental information, will be submitted to City Staff. Parking spaces for the Saccoccia PUD Lot 2 and 3 shall be consistent with the number of spaces specified by the LIDO for each permitted or conditional use that is constructed within each subsequent phase 14. Description of mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping. • 28 An SCS soils map and soils description is included in Appendix E of this document. The suitability of the soils is discussed in Section 2, Part 5. • 15. Building design information Building elevations and perspectives are included in the Figures and Drawings Section of this report. The elevations illustrate building heights. The Site Plan shows the proposed site grading, finish floor.elevations and floor plans of the Lowe's building. At the time of this submittal, the finish floor elevation of the Lowe's HIW building is 4739 feet(NAVD 1988). 16. Temporary facilities plan As noted on the Preliminary Site Plan, temporary construction facilities may be located anyway within the development except within areas designated as stream setback, greenway setback or wetland. The exact location of the construction facilities will be determined during SWPPP preparation. 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed • control plan complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC. The Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan is included in Appendix F. Information for the Weed Management Plan was derived from a vegetative study performed by environmental scientists for the purpose of mapping wetlands on the project site. A copy of the Wetland Investigation is included in Appendix G. 18. Draft of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC (supplementary documents). The supplemental documents requested are included in Easements, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions located in Appendix C. 3.2 SITE PLAN INFORMATION Site Plan information requested on the Site Plan Checklist is presented on the Preliminary Site Plan and in this section. This section is formatted to follow the Site Plan Checklist. • 29 1. — 8. Site Plan information • Information requested from items 1 - 8 is found on the Site Plan located in the Figures and Drawings Section of this report. 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance, or best management practices adopted by the City A Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan is included as Section 5.1 of this report. A detailed Basis of Design Report will be submitted.to the City of Bozeman prior to construction. 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated. • The only drainage features on-site include Walton's Stream/Ditch and wetlands. Both are located on the Preliminary Site Plan. 11. — 25. Site Plan information Information requested from items 11 - 25 is found on the Site Plan located in the Figures and Drawings Section of this report. 4 SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION The proposed project involves a division made outside of platted subdivisions for the purpose of relocating common boundary lines between adjoining properties. A subdivision exemption form is included in Appendix A with a draft certificate of survey located in the figures and drawings section of this submittal. 5 INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN 5.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN • Storm water, for all phases, will be directed to a regional detention pond located in the northeast corner of the planned unit development. For the first phase, storm water will be conveyed 30 through the Lowe's site through a combination of storm sewers and swales. While some perimeter areas may sheet drain directly to these swales, most parking and building areas will drain to catch basins and shallow, small diameter storm sewers. The storm sewer system will • leave the Lowe's site along the east Lowe's property line, cross the interior road, daylight to ground surface and continue to the pond via a grass-lined swale to the detention pond. As the remainder of the PUD develops, the swale across the now undeveloped lot will likely be placed into an underground pipe. From the pond, stormwater will be released into Walton's Stream/Ditch at pre-development rates for a 10-year storm. The detention pond was sized according the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. The suggested method compares predevelopment and post development runoff rates based on the modified rational formula: Q = CiA. The predevelopment runoff rate was determined using the following values: A = 39.99 Acres and C = 0.3 (cultivated land using Gupta 621). The predevelopment intensity value (i) was determined by equating the time of concentration to the duration. For the 39.99 acres, a time of concentration was established using the longest path that water may take to drain. Once the flow path was identified, overland flow calculations were used to determine the velocity of.the flow. The predevelopment time of concentration was then calculated to be 48.1 minutes from • the known flow velocities and distances. With a known time of concentration, an intensity value of 0.74 in/hr was calculated from the Bozeman Area IDF curves for a 10-year storm. The rational formula was then applied to obtain a peak flow of 8.9 cfs. The post development runoff rate was calculated using the same methodology as the predevelopment. The composite C value equal to 0.65, was calculated from a combination of open space C=0.3 and paved area and rooftop C=0.8. The post development time of concentration pathway included open space, parking lot and storm sewer. The time of concentration was calculated to be 13.7 minutes with an intensity of 1.68 in/hr and the post development peak flow was found to be 43.6 cfs. The detention pond was sized by subtracting the total basin release volume from the allowable pre-development runoff at different storm durations. For this site, the required storage volume of approximately 34,000 ft3 is necessary. Assuming a basin depth of 1.5 feet, the. dimensions of the detention pond would roughly be 100 feet by 225 feet. Please reference Appendix H for a drainage basin summary. • 31 5.2 SEWER • Sanitary sewer will be provided to this site via public sewer extensions of the City of Bozeman sewer system. The proposed 8-inch service will be a gravity line and will tie into the 12-inch main located in Baxter Lane which in turn connects to the existing 24-inch main located in the easement on the western boundary of the proposed site. Lots 1 and 3 will be sewered by this proposed main which will be installed within the interior access road connecting Tschache Lane with Baxter Lane. Lot 2 will connect to the Tschache Lane sewer via an existing 8-inch extension. Prior to installation of the sewer, service locations for Lots 2 and 3 will be determined based upon anticipated uses. Manholes will be located at points where the gravity service lines change direction and will include 0.2' drop in all manholes. Manholes will be spaced generally at a maximum of 400 feet within the system. The estimated total peak hour sewage flows to be generated by the development are 34 gpm with 1 gpm contributed from the Lowe's building, 31 gpm from Lot 3 and 2 gpm from Lot 2. The average day sewage flows generated by the development are 0.7 gpm from the Lowe's building, • 22.6 gpm from Lot 3 and 0.8 gpm from Lot 2. 5.3 POTABLE WATER Water main sizes will be determined for the site upon the completion of a water model. The model will incorporate updated site data regarding the proposed uses, input from the City of Bozeman Fire Department and City Engineering comments. For this first phase, water mains, are presumed to be 12-inches in diameter. They will be installed along the west and north sides of Lowe's building and along the east side of the building within the interior road. The main will connect into the existing Tschache Lane water main in two locations and into the main along the west boundary of the site creating a looped system around the Lowe's HIW building. By creating this loop, pressures will be stabilized within the development and fire flows maximized. The first tie-in to Tschache Lane will occur at the location of an existing fire hydrant, which will avoid cutting into the existing street. The other tie-in to Tschache Lane will occur concurrently with the construction of that portion of road. The loop will also be tied into the existing waterline located at the midpoint of the western boundary of the PUD (the old N. 19th Ave. easement). The Lowe's building will be provided water service through a 2" domestic water service line and • a separate 2" irrigation service line. A separate fire service line will provide water to the building's internal fire suppression system. 32 Fire protection for the development will be supplied through fire hydrants. Buildings will also have interior fire suppression systems as required by code. A total of six fire hydrants will be • spaced around the outside of the Lowe's building with an average distance of 320 feet of separation between them. Lot 2 will have an additional fire hydrant placed in the southwest corner of the lot. 5.4 DRY UTILITIES Proposed dry utilities include electric, gas, cable and telephone. For this site, it is proposed that all dry utilities be located within a ten-foot easement that adjoins each lot line. During the preliminary plat process, these agencies will be notified about the project and asked to comment on the location of utilities. Typically, the gas and electric providers control the precise location of these utilities. During road construction, conduit will be installed at intersections to allow for future installation of utilities. 33 aA 1 �m z' 'n I m C i - 1 • I� F' z a ' J IS �I f, r r • APPENDIX A APPLICATION CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street f fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 Ll_ Q _' planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION MAY 2 4 2005 1.Name of Project/Development: Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Planned Unit Development 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Philip Saccoccia Jr. E-mail Address: philipsaccocciajr@prodigy.net Mailing Address: 991 East Beach,Pass Christian,MS 39571 Phone: (228) 575-2309 FAX: (561) 619-0587 3.Applicant Information: Name: Lowe's H1W,Inc. Attn:Jack Mandel E-mail Address: jack.r.mandel@lowes.com • Mailing Address: 1530 Faraday Avenue,Suite 140,Carlsbad,CA 92008 Phone: (760) 804-5309 FAX: (760) 602-1018 4. Representative Information: Name: Morrison-Maierle,Inc. E-mail Address: kbelden@m-rn.net Mailing Address: 306 W.Railroad St.,;Suite 105;Missoula,MT 59808 Phone: (406) 542-8880 FAX: (406) 542-0009 5. Legal Description: COS 1215E;NW 1/4,Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 5 East 6. Street Address: Property lies east of No. 19th Ave. between Tschache Lane on the south and Baxter to the north. 7.Project Description: A planned unit development within the Saccoccia PUD with Lowe's HIW, a large format retail store,as the first phase.Project also includes a boundary realignment.. 8.Zoning Designation(s): Saccoccia PUD;B-2 9. Current Land Use(s): Agricultural • 10.Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Regional Commercial Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑✓ 11. Gross Area: Acres: 39.99 Square Feet: 1,714,964 12.Net Area: Acres: 38.13 Square Feet: 1,660,943 13.Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 • 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑Q Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑✓ P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑ R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA,,vith an Intensification of Use V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑✓ I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑K.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z.Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑A.A.Growth Policy Map Amendment • ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terns and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: � Applicant's Signa Date: c .• Property Owner's Signature: -'" �� Date: l� 0 Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: • Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attaches to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board (DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following: Design Review Board(DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1• 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 0 2• 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or Q ❑ industrial space 3• More than two bui_dings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses, ❑ Q permitted service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 4. 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ ❑✓ 5. Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑✓ ❑ B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1• Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 2• List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 15.76,BMC(Noticing) Q ❑ ❑ 3• A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heave equipment will ❑✓ ❑ ❑ • travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4. Boundary line of property with dimensions ❑ ❑ 5. Date of plan preparation and changes ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 6• North point indicator ❑ ❑ 7. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 8• Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 9• Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio,FAR), ❑✓ ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures 0 ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking ❑r ❑ ❑ C. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑✓ ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ ❑✓ 11. Total number,type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential ❑ ❑ ❑✓ density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities,including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, ❑r ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed, and total square footage of each • Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03;revised 9/22/04) General Information,continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless 21 ❑ ❑ such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the ❑r ❑ ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot ❑� ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑✓ ❑ ❑ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan 0 ❑ ❑ complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC ❑✓ ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location;identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A • 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning ❑r ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to ❑✓ ❑ ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way S ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points ❑r ❑ ❑ 5. 'Traffic flow on-site El ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site Q ❑ ❑ 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric ID ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas ❑✓ ❑ ❑ C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑✓ ❑ ❑ d. Water 0 ❑ ❑ e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: a. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑✓ ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ ❑r identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman ❑ ❑ ❑r • F000dplain Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Page 4 Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A • 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water ❑✓ ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. The downstream conditions(developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ ✓❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑r ❑ ❑ topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details ❑✓ ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of ccnflict 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, 0 ❑ ❑ parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ 15. Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review ❑� ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 18.52,BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refitse collection areas,including typical details ❑✓ ❑ ❑ • 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas (both ❑✓ ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.060.R,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previous4,provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 19. Landscaping-detailed plan showing plantings,equipment,and other appropriate information ❑✓ ❑ ❑ as required in Section 18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required,complete section C below 20. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees ❑ ❑ ❑✓ and shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ ✓❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑✓ ❑ ❑ structures o_districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑r ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ property owner and the person preparing the plan • 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑✓ ❑ ❑ Page 5 Landscape Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain; the approximate location of significant drainage features; • and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ 5. Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, including watercourse buffer ❑✓ ❑ ❑ strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, ❑✓ ❑ ❑ including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking ❑✓ ❑ ❑ and loading areas,including information as to the amount(in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ ❑ ❑✓ damage during construction 10. Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water Q ❑ ❑ features 11. A description of proposed watering methods 21 ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) 0 ❑ ❑ 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan — see Section 18.48.060, BMC (Landscape ❑� ❑ ❑ • Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas Q ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for ❑r ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 19. Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 18.42.100,BMC (Watercourse Setbacks),if ❑✓ ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not 0 ❑ ❑ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls IN P V D S u ►3 "r I rt L Page 6 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ Planned Jnit Development—Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information a":)out adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site 3. A computation table showing the site's proposes land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area B. ❑✓ Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No I N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8t/2-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms ❑r ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and ❑✓ ❑ ❑ • directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ❑✓ ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all ❑✓ ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial ❑r ❑ ❑ uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ applicant h. Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria),BMC.The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section.Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character 0 ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated • j. Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., ❑✓ ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) Page 3 (PUD Checklist_Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04) PUD Preliminary Plan Information,continued Yes No I N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'h-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: lie k. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction ❑✓ ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and ❑✓ ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 81/2-by 11-inches or 11-by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included El ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑✓ ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences,walls and other landscaping C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑r ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map 0 ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent ❑✓ ❑ ❑ off-site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: a. The proposed width 0 ❑ ❑ b. Treatment of curbs and gutters,or other storm water control system if other 0 ❑ ❑ • than curb and guttei is proposed C. Sidewalk systems 0 ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the Q ❑ ❑ City are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following. a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water ❑✓ ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 ❑✓ ❑ ❑ feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to ❑ ❑ ❑✓ the requirements of this tide relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the ❑r ❑ ❑ discretion of the'City Engineer,a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses.The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 18.78.050.L, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8.' If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ ❑✓ under question,the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed Planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑✓ ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property • Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application Page 4 s • C. ❑ Planned Unit Development—Final Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: • PUD Final Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ❑ ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development 2. A_ final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the same scale as the approved preliminary plan.If a different scale is requested or required,a cop),of the approved preliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan. However, only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be permitted for final plans. The final plan site plan shall show the following information: a. Land use data(same information as required on the preliminary site plan) ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Attorneys or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ d. Planning Director certification of approval of the site plan and its ❑ ❑ ❑ conformance with the preliminary plan e. Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth ❑ ❑ ❑ on the sit-2 plan 3. A final landsca-je plan consistent with the conditions and restrictions of the ❑ ❑ ❑ approved preliminary plan shall be submitted. It shall also be consistent with the Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except that any stated conditions and restrictions of the preliminary plan approval shall supersede the provisions of Chapter 18.48(Landscaping),BMC 4. An official final subdivision plat of the site must accompany the final planned unit ❑ ❑ ❑ development plan when applicable. City approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of building permits • 5. Prior to submission of the final plan to the DRC and ADR staff, engineering plans ❑ ❑ ❑ and speci=tcation_s for sewer, .water, street improvements and other public improvements,and an executed improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation_of such improvements,must be submitted to and approved by the City 6. A plan for the maintenance of open space, meeting the requirements of Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 18.72.040(Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee),BMC,shall be submitted with an application for final plan approval. Open space shown on the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan Page.5 SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION CHECKLIST The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not • applicable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ For 5 of fewer lots within a platted subdivision, relocation of common boundaries or the aggregation of lots. Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A 1. An amended plat, legibly drawn with permanent ink or printed or reproduced by a ❑ ❑ ❑ process guaranteeing a permanent record, that is 18-by 24-inches or 24- by 36-inches overall to include a V/2-inch margin on the binding side. The amended plat must include all certificates required by Chapter 18.12 (Subdivision Certificates), BMC and must include all signatures except for the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the Governing Body. 2. The amended plat must show that the exemption was used only to change the location ❑ ❑ ❑ of a boundary line dividing two parcels. 3. The amended plat must dearly distinguish the prior boundary location (shown, for ❑ ❑ ❑ example,by a dashed or broken line or a notation) from the new boundary(shown,for example,by a solid line or notation). 4. The amended plat must bear the signatures of all landowners whose parcels are ❑ ❑ ❑ changed by the relocation. 5. Copy of deed(s) exchanging recorded interest from every person having a recorded ❑ ❑ ❑ interest in adjoining properties for the entire newly-described parcel(s) that is acquiring additional land. 6. Documentation showing the need or reason for the relocation (for example: structure ❑ ❑ ❑ encroachment,surveyor error,or enhancement of the configuration of the property). 7. If there are existing structures on site, an exhibit illustrating the location of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ structures in relation to the relocated property line. B. ❑ Divisions made for the purpose of relocating a common boundary line between a single lot within a platted subdivision and adjoining land outside a platted subdivision. A restriction or requirement on the original platted lot or original unplatted parcel continues to apply to those areas. Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A 1. An amended plat AND a certificate of survey, legibly drawn with permanent ink or ❑ ❑ ❑ printed or reproduced by a process guaranteeing a permanent record,that is 18-by 24- inches or 24- by 36-inches overall to include a V/2-inch margin on the binding side. The amended plat AND certificate of survey must include all certificates required by Chapter 18.12 (Subdivision Certificates),BMC and must include all signatures except for the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the Governing Body. 2. The amended plat and certificate of survey must show that the exemption was used ❑ ❑ ❑ only to change the location of a boundary line dividing two parcels. 3. The amended plat and certificate of survey must clearly distinguish the prior boundary ❑ ❑ ❑ location (shown,for example,by a dashed or broken line or a notation) from the new boundary(shown,for example,by a solid line or notation). 4. The amended plat and certificate of survey must bear the signatures of all landowners ❑ ❑ ❑ whose parcels are changed by the relocation. 5. Copy of deed(s) exchanging recorded interest from every person having a recorded ❑ ❑ ❑ interest in adjoining properties for the entire newly-described parcel(s)that is acquiring additional land. 6. Documentation showing the need or reason for the relocation (for example: structure ❑ ❑ ❑ encroachment,surveyor error,or enhancement of the configuration of the property). 7. If there are existing structures on site, an exhibit illustrating the location of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ • structures in relation to the relocated property line. Page 3 (Subdivision Exemption Checklist—Prepared 11/26/03;revised 9/22/04) C. ✓❑ Divisions made outside of platted subdi-6sions for the purpose of relocating common boundary lines between adjoining properties. • Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A 1. A certificate of survey,legibly drawn with permanent ink or printed or reproduced by a ❑ Q ❑ process guaranteeing a permanent record,that is 18- by 24-inches or 24-by 36-inches overall to include a 11/-inch margin on the binding side. The certificate of survey must include all certificates required by Chapter 18.12 (Subdivision Certificates), BMC and must include all signatures except for the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the Governing Body. D►a 4+ 6 k.b h'`t cj 4e 2. The certificate of survey must show that the exemption was used only to change the ❑� ❑ ❑ location of a boundary line di-riding two parcels. 3. The certificate of survey must clearly distinguish the prior boundary location (shown, Q ❑ ❑ for example,by a dashed or broken line or a notation)from the new boundary(shown, for example,by a solid line or notation). 4. The certificate of survey must bear the signatures of all landowners whose parcels are 0 ❑ changed by the relocation. 5. Copy of deed(s) exchanging recorded interest from every person having a recorded ❑ ❑ ❑✓ interest in adjoining properties for the entire newly-described parcel(s)that is acquiring additional land. 6. Documentation showing the need or reason for the relocation (for example: structure ❑✓ ❑ ❑ encroachment,surveyor error,or enhancement of the configuration of the property). 7. If there are existing structures on site, an exhibit illustrating the location of existing ❑ ❑ 0 structures in relation to the relocated property line. D. ❑ A dixision of land is created to provide security for mortgages, liens or trust indentures for the purpose of construction,improvements to the land being divided or refinancing purposes. • Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A 1• A certificate of survey,legibly drawn with permanent ink or printed or reproduced by a ❑ ❑ ❑ process guaranteeing a permanent record,that is 18- by 24-inches or 24-by 36-inches overall to include a 11/-inch margin on the binding side. The certificate of survey must include all certificates required by Chapter 18.12 (Subd_iision Certificates), BMC and must include all signatures except for the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the Governing Body. 2• Written statement explaining how many parcels within the original tract will be created ❑ ❑ ❑ by use of the exemption,and who will have title to and possession of the remainder of the original parcel. 3• Written statement explaining who will have title to and possession of the remainder of ❑ ❑ ❑ the original parcel. 4• A signed and notarized statement from a lending institution that the creation of the ❑ ❑ ❑ exempted parcel is necessary to secure a construction loan for buildings or other improvements on the parcel. • Page 4 E. ❑ Divisions made outside of platted subdivisions for the purpose of a single gift or sale in each county to each member of the landowner's immediate family. Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A • 1. A certificate of survey,legibly drawn with permanent ink or printed or reproduced by a ❑ ❑ ❑ process guaranteeing a permanent record, that is 18- by 24-inches or 24-.by 36-inches overall to include a 1'/-inch margin on the binding side. The certificate of survey must include all certificates required by Chapter 18.12 (Subdi-,rision Certificates), BMC and must include all signatures except for the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the Governing Body. 2. Copy of deed transferring interest in parcel being created. ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Statement detailing where the deed is in escrow, how long it will be in escrow, and ❑ ❑ ❑ authorization to contact the escrow agent for verification. 4. The COS must indicate the name of the grantee, the relationship of the grantee to the ❑ ❑ ❑ landowner,and the parcel to be conveyed to the grantee. F. ❑ Divisions made outside of platted subdivisions by gift, sale, or an agreement to buy and sell in which the parties to the transaction enter a covenant running with the land and revocable only by mutual consent of the City of Bozeman and the property owner that the divided land will be used exclusively for agricultural purposes. Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A 1. A certificate of survey,legibly drawn with permanent ink or printed or reproduced by a ❑ ❑ ❑ process guaranteeing a permanent record,that is 18- by 24-inches or 24-by 36-inches overall to include a 11/2-inch margin on the binding side. The certificate of survey must include all certificates required by Chapter 18.12 (Subdivision Certificates), BMC and must include all signatures except for the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the Governing Body. • 2. Covenant running with the land, revocable only by mutual consent of the City of ❑ ❑ ❑ Bozeman and the transferee/ property owner, that the divided land will be used exclusively for agricultural purposes, and that no building or structure requiring water or sewer facilities shall be utilized on such a parcel. Page 5 o • i • APPENDIX B TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD February 2002 UPDATED MAY 2005 • Prepared for: Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, Inc. Prepared by: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Boulevard Bozeman, MT 59715 ONTA _= • PHILL J. 0 ��//III Ilk\` • INTRODUCTION This report is an update of the original Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the Lowe's complex in February 2002. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane (see Figure 1). Development of the site was never initiated, but is. again proposed with some modifications to the site plan. Additional development along the North 19th Avenue corridor and elsewhere in the Bozeman area has occurred, with associated increases in existing traffic on the area streets. In addition, a traffic signal has since been installed at the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane, a major point of access near the southwest corner of the site. This update is prepared primarily for evaluation of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse and Garden Center on Lot 1. However, in addition to Lowe's, the complex shown on the current site plan provides one retail / bank pad on Lot 2, and, 13 professional office / retail establishments on proposed Lot 3, all within a 40-acre tract of land. These theoretical uses are also evaluated, in a 10-year build-out scenario. EXISTING CONDITIONS • This site is currently accessed by North 19th Avenue to the west, Tschache Lane to the south, North 7th Avenue to the east, and Baxter Lane to the north. North 19th Avenue currently is a five-lane arterial road, Baxter Lane is a two-lane collector, North 7th Avenue is a five-lane arterial road, and Tschache Lane is a two-lane dead end road - projected for future extension to the east with connections to future north-south roadways. North-south traffic will be dispersed to North 19th Avenue and North 7th Avenue, with east-west traffic to Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane. North 19th Avenue is a five-lane facility to the south of Baxter Lane, and for 1,000' north of Baxter, with dedicated left turn lanes at major intersections. The intersection of North 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane is currently controlled by a two-phase traffic signal. A through/right turn lane and left turn lane are provided on both the westbound and eastbound approaches. Existing traffic counts at the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane were collected Tuesday, April 26, 2005, in both morning and evening peak periods (7:00-9:00 A.M. and 4:00-6:00 P.M., respectively). The morning peak hour began at 7:30 A.M., while the evening peak hour began at 4:45 P.M. (Figures 2, in Appendix A). Supporting traffic data is provided in Appendix A following this report. • NVPN3ZO9 30 S.3MO1 C) Lu Nosludow N"Id3liqw-d • �� nab ������ & e Jill 9. ilg E.g § dg EU IIIIIIIIIIF�0(1--1 agfiTITTTI II HM IN it I ! �}}� �IIII '- - '� r „�w�—"1___.__�i — � I i toag Ij. • i • The intersection of North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane is also controlled by a two-phase traffic signal. The east and west legs of this intersection do not have any lane striping or markings, leaving each to operate as a single-lane approach. There is also a southbound right-turn lane on North 19th at this intersection. Existing traffic counts were collected at the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane on Wednesday, May 4, 2005, for the same peak periods as described above. For North 19th and Tschache Lane the morning peak hour began at 7:45 A.M., while the evening peak hour began at 4:45 P.M. (Figures 3). For this update, analyses of current levels of service at North 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane, and North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane were conducted to evaluate existing traffic conditions. These analyses were completed in accordance with procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCS2000 software). The level-of-service for intersections is measured in terms of delay. Results are quantified as levels-of-service A through F, where LOS A represents the least delay and most favorable conditions while LOS F represents significant delay. Refer to Table 2 and Appendix B for results of the analyses. • PROPO SED DEVELOPMENT Trip Generation: As indicated previously, in addition to the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse and Garden Center, the complex may ultimately consist of one retail / bank pad on Lot 2, and 13 professional office / retail establishments on proposed Lot 3, all within a 40-acre tract of land. A trip generation calculation was completed for this level of development using specific trip generation rates and traffic distribution percentages for the Lowe's building. These were obtained from multiple trip generation studies completed for Lowe's by LandMark Design Group of Virginia Beach, VA, in 2000. For the other possible uses within Lots 2 and 3, standard rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation, 6th Edition were utilized. A summary of the trip rates for each individual land use associated with the development is shown in Table 1. Due to the lack of transit operations in the City of Bozeman, it is not likely that transit will play a role in modal trip exchange in the foreseeable future. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic will also be minimal given the distance from the population base, and the nature of the products offered by Lowe's in particular. Subjective.observation of current low use of the neighboring Bridger Peaks Town Center, by pedestrians and bicyclists, serves to support this assumption. • TABLE 1 Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Trip Generation Worksheet PERCENT NET�NEW TRIPS'2 NET,NEW7RIP8+; aE WEEKDAY AM PEAK PM PEAK WEEKDAY PASS-BY AM PEAK %DIST. ,AM PEAK'.AM PEAK PM PEAK %DIST. i PM PEAK PM PEAK LOT CODE SITE USE SIZE UNITS RATE RATE RATE VOLUME TRIPS VOLUME ENT. EXIT ENTER EXIT'-' VOLUME ENT. EXIT ENTER EXILE{` 1 N/A Commercial,Retail 134,563 SF 39.57 1.51 3.27 5325 25% 203 57% 43% 87t -1 65 rt1 1, 440 49% 51% 162 y� 6 /0 8 1 e17 Nursery(Garden Center) 31,202 SF 36.08 1.31 3.80 1126 25 41 52% 48%e` 15 119 51% 49% .1--TOTAL41" '.._„',7rr.', ^_'ri•+...•., ..r" '- , ^ ..rS wfl:,.,._._:.. .;, kP _•- «�_F x'-. _�" -_.�..... a .._ r� 55-9LOT 4 / 80, r i5i.z.s, 208�c tfis't f;fra I rw.4_ 2 912 Bank 12 Emp. 72.79 3.06 9.37 873 30% 37 56% 44% ; 15 1 k� 11 "x�,,V 112 50% 50%'�,39 a gl^�•)'s 3 710 General Office 19,800 SF 11.01 1.56 1.49 218 5% 31 88% 12% i 26 4 4 30 17% 83% 524 3 715 Single Tenant Office 19,800 SF 11.57 1.78 1.72 229 5% 35 89% 11% 30i� .c '4 .�' 34 15% 85% �1s5--40 ' r27 3 715 Single Tenant Office 19,800 SF 11.57 1.78 1.72 229 5% 35 89% 11°/ .. 30'�f �+ 4 34 15% 85%34 �5"�Sk 27 ^ 3 614 Specialty Retail 8,000 SF 40.67 6.41 2.59 325 15% 51 48% 52% 21rf23 21 43% 57% 58 + �101 3 710 General Office 8,000 SF 11.01 1.56 1.49 88 5% 12 88% 12% %� 10 x I, 12 17% 83% 1 ° a 1" ' �: C 314. r 2sa 9;x s 3 715 Single Tenant Office 8,000 SF 11.57 1.78 1.72 93 10% 14 89% 11% 4 11; : 1t 14 15% 85% r 21« ''11 3 715 Single Tenant Office 8.000 SF 11.57 1.78 1.72 93 10% 14 89% 11% 11 1 14 15% 85% 2 " 11 ". 3 715 Single Tenant Office 8.000 SF 11.57 1.78 1.72 93 10% 14 89% 11% 11,1, 1; 14 15% 85% 2 3 720 Medical-Dental Office 8.000 SF 36.13 2.43 3.66 289 5% 19 80% 20%,f 14�_ .,' 4 29 27% 73% 7'%� f 20 3 no Medical-Dental Office 8,000 SF 36.13 2.43 3.66 289 5% 19 800/, /o 20 14 ;; 4 29 27% 73% 3 e14 Specially Retail 8,000 SF 40.67 6.41 2.59 325 15% 51 48% 52% 21 21 43% 57% 3 814 Specialty Retail 8.000 SF 40.67 6.41 2.59 325 15% 51 48% 52% , 21�41" 23 21 43% 57% �85, =10 3 814 Specialty Retail 8,000 SF 40.67 6.41 2.59 325 15% 51 48% ,2% 1'21 } 23�_` 21 43% 57% 8'-}i :110Jr� LOTS 2 8 3-TOTA ,..r7k^a.y^suea TrXrxl 1 t "�. r i" a�1x�* nwx- y y�.s�-•-r - w: < s r r ,t.. Win:f 8 �r•v L ?.6s . 1 145800 r" .'.. * i"f"' t ^� •3794 , a 434 "ryf Y^ 3 s. a...,,..t.... .a........b-.... . .s,.z_S.` .I,,._....d ..E:.s� t+.:::..". _ -. - -. •�.�.. v. :., ;r,256.x.'"Y 127 406 ,, i1 �108.y 239M., - - - - -, .• . c°".,- p�-.. L . _ 6--5 •, i L�`'�-'`Y4�2.}:-`5r 3 9PROACTTOTALS.1.` 0245 07CMn I:1Rai:a' Notes: Lowe's rates(%DIST.,WEEKDAY RATE,AM PEAK RATE,PM PEAK RATE)obtained from multiple trip generation studies completed for Lowe's in 2000,and are per 1000 SF All other rates are from Trip Generation,6th Edition,and are per 1000 SF H:M7-31DOCS1n-ippen.20M_I • Pass-By Trips: The trips generated by a commercial development are not necessarily new, i.e. in addition to, the traffic already on the roadways. There are a number of components that these trips can be divided into depending on various characteristics of the project area. Based on the demographics in the area of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, and its location on North 19th Avenue (a major commuter corridor), it was determined that pass-by trips will be significant to the evaluation of this project. Pass-by trips are already on the roadway system enroute to another destination. Stopping at a certain development is due to a need or convenience. Since these trips come from traffic already on the roadway system, their impact on that system can be ignored when evaluating the proposed development's impacts. Independent studies of home improvement warehouses have indicated that pass-by rates vary between 25 and 35 percent of the total traffic generated by the warehouses. Given this, a pass-by rate of 25 percent was utilized to determine a conservative number of pass-by trips for the Lowe's development. Pass-by trip percentages for the other possible uses within the PUD were used as indicated in the trip generation table, based on the specified land use. Table 1A summarizes the resulting trip generation for the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse in bold, followed by trips for the entire project. These values reflect the new trips expected to be a result of full development of the project. • TABLE 1A— TRIP GENERATION O ANALYSIS ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT (VPH) (VPH) (VPH) A.M. PEAK 56% 44% 103 80 183 P.M. PEAK 50% 50% 208 212 420 A.M. PEAK 63% 37% 359 207 566 P.M. PEAK 41% 59% 316 451 767 Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment: Site generated trips were distributed based upon historical traffic volumes and existing land uses in this vicinity. For evaluation of opening day conditions for the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, particular attention was paid to the orientation of the Lowe's improvements on Lot 1 and the existing distribution of traffic from a • similar use on the west side of N. 19th Avenue. Figure 4A illustrates this opening day distribution by percentage. ENGINEERS MORRISON SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS 0o MAIERLE,INC. SINCE 1945 • An Bynployee-Ounwd Company LOWE' S - BOZEMAN 5% 10% BAXTER LN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P�-�G. . . . . . .... .... .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% TSCHACHE LN. 0% 0 OPENING DAY (2006) SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION NO SCALE • N FIGURE 4A • ENGINEERS MORRISON SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS 0o MAIERLE,INC. SINCE 1945 • An Employes-Ounwd Company LOWE ' S - BOZEMAN 15% 10% BAXTER LN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Q Z . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r yG . . . . . . . . . . . .P _P� . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% TSCHACHE LN. 10% 0 FULL DEVELOPMENT (2015) SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION NO SCALE • N ® FIGURE 4B • For the overall development of the site, with the possible mixture of uses quite different than home improvement supplies, it is generally anticipated that the site-generated traffic will be fairly evenly distributed to the north on North 19th Avenue via 1-90 and Valley Center, and on North 7th Avenue via Baxter Lane; to the south on the existing network of collectors and arterials, i.e. North & South 19th Avenue, Oak Street, Durston Road, and Main Street. Based on the Trip Generation Worksheet, the peak hour of traffic is greatest in the evening. Adjacent street traffic is also the greatest in the evening, indicating that all analyses of the affected intersections can effectively be based on the worst-case evening peak hour traffic. Capacity Analysis: SiWnalized intersection analyses were completed for the intersections of North 19t Avenue with Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane. These analyses were completed in accordance with procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCS2000 software). An opening day analysis was conducted to determine whether acceptable operations could be maintained at the intersections of North 19th Avenue with Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane. A year 2015 analysis with full development as assumed for this study was also conducted. For the 2015 analyses, interpolation • of 2010 and 2020 traffic volumes from the City of Bozeman's Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update were used to project growth in background traffic. These volumes appear to correlate well with Montana Department of Transportation traffic counts (Figure 5). Table 2 provides a summary listing of the calculated levels-of-service, with the results quantified as level-of-service A through F. Detailed capacity reports are provided in Appendix B for the two intersections for Lowe's opening day and full development in year 2015 (Figures 6). • • TABLE 2 — INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE w/PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE — P.M. PEAK HOUR FULL OPENING DAY DEVELOPMENT EXISTING 2006 2015 N. 19th Ave. & Tschache Ln B - OVERALL C — OVERALL D - OVERALL NB LEFT B B C NB THRU B C D NB RIGHT - B B SB LEFT B B F SB THRU A B C SB RIGHT - B B WB LEFT - D F WB THRU C - E WB RIGHT - D E EB LEFT/THRU/RIGHT C E F N. 1 91h Ave. & Baxter Ln B- OVERALL C — OVERALL D — OVERALL NB LEFT C B E NB THRU/RIGHT B C D • SB LEFT C B D SB THRU/RIGHT B C C WB LEFT C C E WB THRU C C D WB RIGHT - C D EB LEFT B C F EB THRU B C E EB RIGHT - - D Table 2A, below, presents a comparison of the results of analyzing the subject intersections in the year 2015 with, and without the Lowe's development. Only the projected background traffic volumes increases, and existing geometrics, were used to analyze future operations at the intersections in the "without" scenario, in order to identify the real impacts of the development, positive and negative. Projected background traffic volumes increases, plus site-generated traffic volumes, and proposed geometrics were used to analyze operations in the "with" scenario. • • TABLE 2A— INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE YEAR 2015 LOCATION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE — P.M. PEAK HOUR WITHOUT WITH DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT N. 19th Ave. & Tschache Ln B - OVERALL D - OVERALL NB LEFT E C NB THRU B D NB RIGHT - B SB LEFT C F SB THRU A C SB RIGHT A B WB LEFT - F WB THRU D E WB RIGHT - E EB LEFT/THRU/RIGHT D F N. 19 Ave. & Baxter Ln D - OVERALL D — OVERALL NB LEFT F E NB THRU/RIGHT B D . SB LEFT D D SB THRU/RIGHT B C • WB LEFT F E WB THRU F D WB RIGHT - D EB LEFT F F EB THRU D E EB RIGHT - D Safety Analysis: Accident information was obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation Safety Management System for the period from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2004 for the study area. A three-year analysis time period is considered an adequate timeframe to sufficiently identify any accident trends and/or safety issues. At North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane, there were 18 recorded accidents, 6 involving personal injury, within the specified time frame. Of the 18, eight were right-angle accidents associated with left-turns, nine were rear end accidents likely due to driver inattention and/or following too closely for the stop and go nature of a signalized intersection. At North 19th Avenue and Baxter Lane, there were 27 recorded accidents, 12 involving personal injury, in the same time period. Of the 27, eleven were right-angle accidents associated with left-turns, ten were rear end accidents • common at a signalized intersection. EVALUATION The Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD will produce increased traffic volumes on North 19th Avenue, Baxter Lane, and Tschache Lane. The net effects of this traffic increase vary along these facilities. A review of traffic operations was conducted to evaluate existing and future traffic conditions. Improvements to the two major intersections near the site will be required over time, as described below. North 19th Avenue/Tschache Lane: As indicated earlier, because the evening peak hour at this intersection has significantly higher volumes than the morning peak hour, all evaluations were performed for the evening peak. Existing: Currently this intersection operates at an overall LOS B, with eastbound and westbound approaches at LOS C. Opening Day: For evaluating.the likely traffic conditions on opening day of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse in 2006, background traffic volumes were increased above today's conditions by 10% on N. 19th Avenue, and by 5% on Tschache Lane. These increases were based on an evaluation of MDT traffic data-for N. 191h Avenue, south of Baxter Lane, for the period from • 1998 — 2004. In addition to these background increases, the net new trips expected to be generated by Lowe's were added in accordance with the distribution shown for opening day on Figure 4A. The resulting evening peak hour (2006) was evaluated using HCS2000 software, with signal phasing and timing consistent with current operations. Modifying the intersection geometry to include a right-turn lane on the westbound approach of Tschache and a right-turn lane on the northbound approach of N. 19th would address opening day traffic demands and resolve capacity issues on those two approaches that are apparent with existing geometrics. Traffic demands will also require the addition of protected left-turn arrows on 19th to resolve the resultant left-turn congestion. The combination of these improvements will avoid over-saturation and ensure all queued traffic clears the intersection with each cycle of the signal. However the movements on Tschache will still reflect LOS in the E and D range due to the length of the signal cycle needed to serve the related growth in traffic volume. The overall intersection LOS is C. Year 2015: While the uses indicated in the trip generation table for the fourteen (14) separate building pads shown on the site plan are consistent with • the overall PUD, they are considered rather speculative at this time. With that caveat, however, the full build-out conditions for the year 2015 were evaluated in • similar fashion. The results of the modeling efforts are contained in Appendix B. Background traffic volumes were increased above today's conditions b 37% on N. 19th Avenue, and by 10% on Tschache Lane. The increase on N. 19 was estimated by using the same MDT traffic data as described above, plus values for this part of the N. 19th corridor taken from the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update. The resulting volumes indicate some moderation of the rate of growth on the corridor, after the recent years of significant increases. Again, in addition to these background increases, the net new trips from full build-out of the area shown on the site plan were distributed and added in accordance with the distribution shown on Figure 4B. Under these conditions, it is anticipated that one additional modification at the intersection may be needed to maintain effective traffic flow. By modifying the westbound approach to include a new left-turn lane, allowing the through lane to include a second left-turn movement, and providing a separate signal phase for each of the two Tschache approaches, the increase in traffic demand can be accommodated. This future modification can be expected to keep the intersection operations under saturation. The overall level of service of the intersection in year 2015 is anticipated to be LOS D. All movements in the • intersection are expected to operate at a level below saturation, ensuring all queued traffic clears the intersection with each cycle of the signal. North 19th Avenue/Baxter Lane Intersection: Consistent with the intersection of N. 19th & Tschache Lane, the evening peak hour at the intersection of N. 19th & Baxter Lane has significantly higher volumes than the morning peak hour. Therefore all evaluations were performed for the evening peak. Existing: Currently this intersection operates at an overall LOS of B, with northbound and southbound left-turns, and all westbound movements at LOS C. Opening Day: For evaluating the likely traffic conditions on opening day, background traffic volumes were increased above today's conditions by 10% on N. 19th Avenue, and by 10% on Baxter Lane. Net new trips expected to be generated by Lowe's were added in accordance with the distribution shown for opening day on Figure 4A. The resulting evening peak hour (2006) was evaluated using HCS2000 software, with signal phasing and timing consistent with current operations. Modifying the intersection geometry to include a right-turn lane on the • westbound approach of Baxter would address opening day traffic demands and • resolve capacity issues on the approach that are apparent with existing geometrics. Traffic demands will also require the addition of protected left-turn arrows on 19th to resolve the resultant left-turn congestion. The combination of these improvements will avoid over-saturation and ensure all queued traffic clears the intersection with each cycle of the signal. Overall intersection LOS is C, and all movements operate at LOS C or better. Year 2015: The conditions at this intersection in 2015 without the Lowe's store, or the balance of the PUD, were modeled separately to allow for identification of the effects of the subject development on the intersection. For an evaluation of traffic conditions in 2015, background traffic volumes were increased by 37% on N. 19th Avenue, and by 30% on Baxter Lane. Using the existing signal phasing and geometrics at the intersection, by 2015 the overall intersection LOS drops to D, with all westbound movements, the eastbound left- turn, and the northbound left-turn failing, i.e. having v/c ratios greater than 1.00. To model the intersection with the development, the net new trips from full build-out of the area shown on the site plan were added in accordance with the distribution shown on Figure 4B. Under these conditions, it is anticipated that one additional modification at the intersection may be needed to maintain effective traffic flow. By modifying • the eastbound approach to include a new right-turn lane, the increase in traffic demand can be accommodated. This future modification can be expected to keep the intersection operations under saturation. The overall level of service of the intersection in year 2015 is anticipated to be LOS D. All movements in the intersection are expected to operate at a level below saturation, ensuring all queued traffic clears the intersection with each cycle of the signal. CONCLUSIONS The affected intersections in the immediate area of the site will operate at acceptable levels of service with the initial development of Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse with the recommended geometric and signal phasing modifications. The intersections of Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane with North 19th Avenue are projected to eventually drop to level of service D wtih full build out of the PUD as shown on the current site plan, even when geometric and signal phasing changes are made. Delays will become longer as signal timing is reserved for through movements on North 19th Avenue, one of the City of Bozeman's major arterials. These delays indicate a lower level of service, as measured by delay, on certain legs and/or individual movements. A better measure of a signalized intersection's operations under high- volume circumstances is actually the ratio of the volume to the lane capacity of • the individual movements. As traffic volumes in the 19th Avenue arterial corridor i �► • increase in the future, traffic signal cycle times will need to be lengthened to keep traffic on the corridor moving at peak periods of the day. These increases will add delay to the side streets, and based on current methods of assessment, automatically lower the levels of service on said side streets. However, at levels less than saturation, i.e. ratios less than 1.00, access to the corridor is assured with each cycle of the signal. Making improvements as needed to avoid over- saturation and ensure the queued traffic clears each cycle is considered a more practical design criterion in these high-volume situations. The City will soon fund improvements to North 19th Avenue generally between Baxter Lane and East Valley, in part through the creation of a special improvement district. Impact Fees are also a major component of the funding package. It is anticipated that the North 19th improvements will be complete, and the new five-lane section open to traffic prior to the opening of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Warehouse. RECOMMENDATIONS General Site Development: ■ Extend Tschache Lane east of its current terminus to allow for access to all proposed drive approaches, and allow for extension/connection to future north-south roadways. • ■ Because of the assumptions necessaryto prepare this Traffic Impact Analysis for the 2015 time horizon, this report should be updated prior to significant development subsequent to the opening of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse facility. Particular attention should be paid to the operational characteristics of the signalized intersections. ■ The property owner(s) should sign a waiver of right-to-protest creation of a special improvement district to fund improvements to Baxter Lane to a collector roadway section adjacent to the site. ■ Given the increases in roadside development in this area of the N. 19th Avenue corridor, it is recommended that the City of Bozeman request a special speed zone study by the Montana Department of Transportation. N. 191h Avenue & Tschache Lane Intersection: Reconfigure the east leg of the intersection to provide one left-through and one right lane prior to the opening of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. ■ Reconfigure the south leg of the intersection to provide a new right-lane prior to the opening of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. • • ■ Request that.the Montana Department of Transportation allow the addition of a protected left-turn phase on North 19th Avenue prior to the opening of the Lowe's store. If allowed, modify the existing signal to provide the left- turn arrows. ■ Review the amount of storage provided in the existing southbound left-turn storage bay; modify as/if indicated. ■ If development is in conformance with that assumed for this analysis, widen the east leg to provide dual left-turn lanes onto N. 19th Avenue prior to full development of the PUD. This modification will require a change to the signal phasing to provide a separate phase for each of the two side street approaches. N. 19th Avenue & Baxter Lane Intersection: ■ Widen the east leg of the intersection to provide a new right-turn lane prior to the opening of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. ■ Request that the Montana Department of Transportation allow the addition of a protected left-turn phase on North 19th Avenue prior to the opening of the Lowe's store. If allowed, modify the existing signal to provide the left- turn arrows. • ■ Review the amount of storage provided in the existing southbound left-turn storage bay; modify as/if indicated. ■ If development is in conformance with that assumed for this analysis, widen the west leg to provide a new right-turn lane prior to full development of the PUD. • HA3373\001\Dots\UPDATED TIS-2005.doc • APPENDIX A Supporting Traffic Data • M' MORMSON M Figure 2 ■■ MMERLE,INC. Traffic Count Summary Intersection: N. 19th&Baxter Lane City of Bozeman MMI# 3373.003 Date Field Work Performed: 4/26/2005 Bin M 16 15 14 6 7 6 12 11 10 4 3 2 15-Min Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 15-Min Hourly Be Inning Left Thru Right Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Totals Volumes Evening 4:00 20 6 24 16 14 20 25 233 5 7 203 10 583 2453 4:15 15 4 20 16 14 21 30 230 6 11 186 10 563 2590 4:30 21 5 21 19 15 33 33 267 14 5 153 11 597 2751 4:45 22 6 34 11 17 41 35 278 8 9 230 19 710 2828 START PEAK HOUR 5:00 21 9 28 46 21 50 24 288 3 9 214 7 720 2733 5:15 21 5 25 30 21 43 19 320 10 11 210 9 724 5:30 9 7 24 20 26 39 11 278 8 12 235 5 674 5:45 12 1 6 15 11 7 26 22 272 3 15 222 4 615 391 Evening PHF 0.83 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.82 0.87 0.64 0.91 0.73 0.85 0.95 0.53 Evening Southbound 40 889 41 73 113 Eastbound 27 2828 85 Westbound 111 107 Baxter Lane 89 1164 29 Northbound • N.19th Avenue • • • MORMSON �■ MMERLE,INC. Figure 2 Traffic Count Summary Intersection: N.19th&Baxter Lane City of Bozeman MMI# 3373.003 Date Field Work Performed: 4/26/2005 Bin#: 16 15 14 6 7 6 12 11 10 4 3 2 15-Min Interval Eastbound Westbound 'Northbound Southbound 15-Min Hourly Beginning Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Totals Volumes Morning 7:00 3 7 9 4 4 0 3 80 4 4 133 6 257 1549 7:15 7 6 9 6 4 5 7 90 6 11 191 13 355 1735 7:30 6 10 19 5 4 5 5 106 6 23 275 12 . _ 476 1636 START PEAK HOUR 7:45 6 11 11 7 4. 6 4. 131 21 19 231 10 461 1737 8:00 6 7 18 15 11 6, 11 89 16 11 240 13 443 1675 8:15 7 9 14 17 3 9 6 123 12 13 234 9 456 8:30 6 5 22 9 4 6 8 110 5 5 162 15 377 8:45 9 10 16 11 7 7 11 118 9 10 179 12 399 Morning PHF 0.89 0.84 0.82 1 0.65 0.50 0.72 0.59 0.86 0.65 0.72 0.89 0.85 Morning Southbound 44 980 66 25 26 Eastbound 37 1836 22 Westbound 62 44 Baxter Lane 26 449 55 Northbound N.19th Avenue • 0 • � MORRISON Figure 6 ■■ MAIERLE INC. N. 19th & Baxter Lane Opening Day: Evening Southbound 44 978 76 80 222 Eastbound 40 3195 104 Westbound 122 118 Baxter Lane 98 1280 32 Northbound N. 19th Avenue Design Year(2015): • Evening Southbound 55 1218 104 95 293 Eastbound 83 4064 178 Westbound 144 139 Baxter Lane 122 1595 40 Northbound N. 19th Avenue • • NJMORRISON Figure 3 ■■ MERLE,INC. Traffic Count Summary Intersection: N. 19th&Tschache Lane City of Bozeman MMI# 3373.003 Date Field Work Performed: 5/4/2005 Bin#: 16 15 14 8 7 6 12 11 10 4 3 2 15-Min Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 15-Min Hourly Beginning Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Totals Volumes Morning 7:00 1 0 5 0 0 0 7 81 0 0 167 0 261 1422 • 7:15 2 0 2 1 0 0 3 118 0 0 184 0 310 1558 7:30 3 0 4 0 0 1 6 155 0 1 204 2 376 1678 7:45 5 0 7 0 0 2 7 176 1 3 273 1 475 1679 START-PEAK HOUR 8:00 7 0 4 0 0 0 16 122 4 4 240 0 397 1590 8:15 4 0 8 0 0 2 5 170 3 3 235 0 430 8:30 7 0 12 1 1 1 10 149 0 0 195 1 377 8:45 1 6 14 0 0 5 12 157 1 0 165 1 386 Morning PHF 0.82 N/A 0.65 1 0.25 0.25 0.63 1 0.59 0.88 0.50 0.63 0.86 0.50 Morning Soulhbound 2 943 10 23 Eastbound 0 1679 1 Westbound 31 1 Tschache Lane 38 617 8 Northbound N.19th Avenue • • • • N, MORRISON Figure 3 ■■ MAIERLE,INC. Traffic Count Summary Intersection: N.19th&Tschache Lane City of Bozeman MMI# 3373.003 Date Field Work Performed: 5/4/2005 Bin#: 16 15 14 8 7 6 12 11 10 4 3 2 15-Min Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 15-Min Hourly Beginning Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Totals Volumes Evening 4:00 10 0 21 2 2 18 15 309 5 15 232 0 629 2578 4:15 13 0 16 8 2 12 16 281 1 10 230 1 590 2624 4:30 8 3 14 11 0 17 13 300 3 13 268 0 650 2749 4:45 9 1 11 5 1 21 21 338 1 11 280. 1 709 2777 START PEAK HOUR 5:00 17 1 15 11 0 15 19 317 3 13 259 5 675 2718 5:15 18 2 13 8 2 19 17 348 5 11 271 1 715 5:30 8 1 13 1 0 24 19 368 2 6 235. 1 678 5:45 14 0 16 11 0 21 15 326 2 11 234 0 650 391 Evening PHF 0.72 0.63 0.87 0.57 0.38 0.82 0.90 0.93 0.55 0.79 0.91 0.40 Evening Southbound 8 1054 41 52 79 Eastbound 5 2777 3 Westbound 52 25 Tschache Lane 76 1371 11 Northbound • N. 19th Avenue • ■ Figure 6 NEIMORRISON MAIERLE, INC. N. 19th & Tschache Lane Opening Day: Evening Southbound 9 1159 103 55 142 Eastbound 9 3338 7 Westbound 55 111 Tschache Lane 84 T 1508 95 Northbound N. 19th Avenue • Design Year(2015) Evening Southbound 11 1444 113 57 168 Eastbound 12 4130 12 Westbound 57 163 Tschache Lane 104 1878 110 Northbound N. 19th Avenue N. 19th Traffic Counts 30000 -- - 28000 26000 — 24000 — 22000 --- -- --- 0 20000 --- — --- MDT Data Q Linear (MDT Data) 18000 16000 - - ---- 1 3�7-y 1-3.85-3. 14000 — 12000 10000 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year N. 19th Traffic Counts 40000 { is °bfi ti err r e aR' '�C'"� �: €k I L£4 - z `y r.--.�rxas 3'�k��'�'�F �n '� ?a'o-w (•T c �' ..r»r d a fita.� ad r1,rw'�kS" v -��,{�t^Id`tr�'_�-�,'t'��� ap.r�4.'�'w K,F�k�Yt�t y�' �`5rtr�-'R•rwf�ln'�^^wk'�T^ x'�3� s.� 4 w t"�a�✓tkM,`�" ���. i �`• 3r°n$� �'�nl" y'�"tS�. 'p�S" �"S'� k''��l„�`I�`�trv.�(r��-+} '�''H��r,�''n..�.'c 3 w. c��i'�g'.,. xu�e wry,*,.�,� pp �7.���-�, rh:E'"t"�.�.�j'�y �^;;r� �a�i� '`°� ��'7t �a •�..�'� �r�l,9:i�7'�?+�^,F..t.,�`)��}"'�r„•�....�"'s��"N�.�^'�-��+rrG.cv 35000 . 'r rc=aS �� rms.„�t' i° x^J" i h r"Tx -r,..t n='•Rr f " �t = °�5.4 n f-i'' F � "� - 30000 ' "-'v-`r'Sx' : bx�,? C''�i3 :,',f•'�"° y`�<6�' a�r ; �'-�r,.' 'N�k>�;'�'' ,p a nl. '� .Fr�. .d urt G + ;;- ''.y�`'': $ s���"..n'�.�' 'i�,n -ri"'k"` ��,, ®�t�a, «a�` ��s."�.. �, 3.:; �,.• � s'�-r r�b,3 _ - �,y'�'y' �. "+,�(.v 4r� �� #-.��'•r`aid 3Y�� 4,. �'�� �ta x ^•.G_ 'NF` a .'�i N ?x,t."� -§+t �.^'r�.,�.c�"7�i��F����t, ... .. _. ,�.sx �h,. Y-s3's„�s a3,n 5.?r,E,.ti 4,�y� '�� lva`�- -'yk'� s 4't�3�`i?',f' `f" F'�,•>y � �' J±�'?I ��f5s � I . .�r rt //► °i f `3r`'a��,,,- twi'i' >, t� `it .. s � �" ,a.� � "!•,'�4�r�' � l�� u�`µ+��,e ���.."� . L 5000 - r �' - . ' ,r -fv�'y"'�a'F+, ��A~�� �OK P Q'K qQ y l 'n.Y x.� 4r r n,,, r- PT ` -wv xF I � ." "., F• r -f �.' ri cv r" .u'�",� '�� rt'",�•}Y��'L�rR'nhi'�'� ��'�e�� .-.a�a` r`�' '` �°� •� :.� MDT Data 20000 /1 L 0 0 0 0 ��$'�•'i d s�?� +.t� t f 'y,w,y w +u 'k5a 9 t �e,� 'k�1`F�` r5i C X�i` '��x� �+,�S t k1z '"#'•�.� �',t ''r""� gTJl- � q� �"`' 'Yx�?Fk -%.s°,. rk '! x s� r .,.a�' -r� r i3l s�'�'" t�• �a �.`,�• � r.t ,,, .9'c ": .h�,k e �'�e•Gr�-tr 'g,r ysr�. '�� .` �,• .. ° '�3Y �� 1�1 F R p� 7k Linear (MDT Data) � H?-0tM1� fir '"�F, f '� ,�t��pyl �i �� t�' 'ri'ky y`'�*h�'' 7.,x �S.'�''""a1"''+�- �.+.1-,� .x .. ��F����� ', fix..}���•3}�� � �-.���v�2�•�r �{t� ���,� ,�, .:��t�F��-��yS .� r:�^ � ' 5 0 0 0 1 1 �' `g'F� 3,,,a-•`� ��'G& ����^l t ���x S�Fs �.j''�,��w��{'�., � ,��,•w,�'��,r•,S's�.� ty�� s7.°�'${'�'y;�;P t�'I""# Af it a 1"r�yy".'i,,.-.k d T-�,ITS e'R^'.�"a,.` ° �1"ha'�i ry 'yht'M'{•,c°a'fl? n ti pf„' 1 •• ,�,.' a 't�'�}'3 a•,sy- �• �,j ,-, ,�+,w f ,t'� '.-,�.I ,`rw} q t T,y�.,Y' - } t .6D cb'��l:�Yl� �'��>i->�� ,� 1 't2�i"1"� ?����'7�?y� q� �4 Y''Z. �l A�F^E{,�"�... .4�...�!�•3 '3' �U't�.�.f'1� �.�v��M rtx•� - t .10000 ' 1 � ! �j•� w�'� �R a vw ?-�� �k..se ra i�. 4a,`^F3�,�''1-�.-r c� fir+ m i q�;c. "t rn�-�Rr lu t:3 '�. - -c - d § `�v`r 7� °Y ham+.. 4 1'X1. •� ° �s �� .d' � � ti> �.. k"a'�x R.�8 r�m s �d? 'irtq. � ,.f,-d� � U 'cl�J`Y`4' •'�v.r+•'f'¢ 17's �. n ,� �F>L.'r rti �-w,'� _ k�,r'ft�Wr�r�'�Flyt.. u.'ss3�rs� �x'r�•`t r r �. •Js�$' �#.>� �z,> �•�. t.. � r �ra� x�,{rr•. 4n� frn �- w�"�'-.� >g�'���� �a���,,} W' � +�� hr ''Y:. s'��x`��`••�"��a y�.� ° �r'usi�}e`�, a� � � , 5000 _�x°w >�s+ r z�c'�'�a_."i�v aS'•`� -�4 -.,�t �5� �`t'�'.s�E�vf �-":.zr 'r�`�'� ��.� a'°tS�aG��� ti� µ� •C' -•*r�k'*,$``r .t >F v "fir r d �S'r*ss.rLvr eta laxh }wn irvyrq 1+F3•-x- r* Er -j"'C `�,rt �i�`€w 'awr or,�i•-n"a"�CG�T��.s2�,�` .'�i t�►��Yse7- `�a,1° eF-'+��5 �?�ii � +�� ��rr� a�s �,.,:.t <! �-` .d�;�i.r a •! t S i as..-tJ r Y'• f,.-4,Y I f�>•{" t� � ��. ila�f'S'�,'R ��s ',aI .f,.y'� , 4.� a^� -y'{) d� ^+z a��€� � "$:as.0� a�'',a s'�"K� fib''�:. ` `���'ryy t t' •.�4�„�� ,�C���f Y e'��� I•. ''k"�.yi'� ���}•y '��71'bi'J���� _P�#"X' � -Y<G�l F�ro ��N�t•u4��•� A-f'<�..�iN . r � "`.� y�t � �'� n �'t��"{^_ �'•��.� �b�s; * w "fit � � ��°��''�' •� !_ -t+ n$ � a Jt x� ,,�� �^M,r 9 ss,�, r 8•y,n R S Y r'iYl - � - 0 Rn� ��Y�fi���:���a,.i,� L` .;�c4.1'•���7'�1'a� ::a�-����..�&3, ?��-' ���1r c' °��-'� "�v�"�.t ='?'.�as� " Cl�p� A- r 0. A- � �O OCV 017� O`V OV k� I ` �`(lJ �� Nj rp� �� �� ��. rp� rpo rp� rp� TO 0 T�� - Year • APPENDIX B LOS Summary Worksheets - HCS Output HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Tschache • Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 51512005 Jurisdiction MDT/COB Time Period Existing PM Peak Analysis Year 2005 Project ID Lowe's Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V(vph) 52 5 52 25 3 79 76 1371 11 41 1054 8 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.72 0.63 0.87 0.57 0.38 0.82 0.90 0.93 0.55 0.79 0.91 0.40 Pretimed (P)or actuated (A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE �.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/ Bike/RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 10.0 G = G = G = G = 30.0 G = G = G = Y= 6 1 Y = Y = Y = IY = 7 Y = Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 1 Cycle Length, C = 53.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 140 148 84 1494 52 1178 Lane group capacity, c 264 280 212 2000 142 1999 • v/c ratio, X 0.53 0.53 0.40 0.75 0.37 0.59 Total green ratio, g/C 0.19 0.19 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 Uniform delay, di 19.4 19.4 6.4 8.6 6.3 7.5 1.000 1 1.000 1 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50. 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 7.4 7.0 5.5 2.6 7.1 1.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 26.8 26.4 11.9 11.2 13.4 8.8 Lane group LOS C C B B B A Approach delay 26.8 26.4 11.3 9.0 Approach LOS C C B A. Intersection delay 11.8 Xc = 0.69 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id 1 • • HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Tschache • Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/5/2005 Jurisdiction MDT/COB Time Period Analysis Year 2006 Project ID Lowe's Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Lane group LTR LT R L T R L T R Volume, V(vph) 55 9 55 111 7 142 84 1508 95 103 1159 9 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.72 0.63 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.72 0.90 0.93 0.55 0.79 0.91 0.40 Pretimed (P)or actuated (A) A A A A A A P P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 1 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike/ RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/ Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 1 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G = 14.0 G = G = G = G = 6.0 G = 40.0 G = G = Timing Y= 6 1Y= Y= Y = IY = 7 Y = 7 Y= Y = Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 153 139 197 93 1622 173 130 1274 22 Lane group capacity, c 180 213 280 253 1770 800 228 1770 800 • v/c ratio, X 0.85 0.65 0.70 0.37 0.92 0.22 0.57 0.72 0.03 Total green ratio, g/C 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.66 0.50 0.50 0.66 0.50 0.50 Uniform delay, di 132.0 30.7 31.0 9.4 18.5 11.2 14.9 15.6 10.1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.38 . 0.23 0.27 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.16 0.50 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 30.0 7.0 7.8 4.1 9.0 0.6 3.4 2.6 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 62.0 37.7 38.6 13.4 27.5 11.8 18.3 18.2 10.2 Lane group LOS E D D B C B B B B Approach delay' 62.0 38.3 25.3 18.1 Approach LOS E D C B Intersection delay 25.2 X = 0.91 Intersection LOS C c. HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d • • HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Tschache • Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 51512005 Jurisdiction MDT/City Time Period PM Peak W/O Lowes Analysis Year 2015 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L T R Volume, V(vph) 57 6 57 28 3 87 104 1878 15 56 1444 11 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.72 0.63 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.72 0.90 0.93 0.55 0.79 0.91 0.40 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/ RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/ Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 10.0 G = G = G I G = 40.0 G = G = G = Y = 6 Y = Y = Y = IY = 7 Y= Y= Y = Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 63.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow rate, v 155 158 116 2046 71 1587 27 Lane group capacity, c 220 243 128 2243 119 2247 1015 • v/c ratio, X 0.70 0.65 0.91 0.91 0.60 0.71 0.03 Total green ratio, g/C 0.16 0.16 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 Uniform delay, di 25.1 24.9 9.9 10.0 6.8 7.6 4.3 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 17.3 12.7 57.5 7.1 20.1 1.9 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 42.4 37.6 67.4 17.0 26.9 9.5 4.3 Lane group LOS D D E I 8 C A A Approach delay 42.4 37.6 19.7 10.2 Approach LOS D D 8 8 Intersection delay 17.4 Xc = 0.87 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d • • HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information • Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Tschache Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 51512005 Jurisdiction MDT/COB Time Period PM Peak Adjusted Analysis Year 2015 Project ID Volume and Timing In ut =B WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Lane group LTR L LT R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 57 1 12 57 163 12 168 104 1878 110 113 1444 11 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.72 0.63 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.72 0.90 0.93 0.55 0.79 0.91 0.40 Pretimed (P)or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/ Bike/ RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking /Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 P Phasing EB Only WB Only 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 14.0 G = 10.0 G = G = G = 8.0 G = 79.0 G = G = Y = 6 IY = 6 Y= Y = IY= 6 Y = 6 Y= IY= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 135.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 164 112 94 233 116 2019 200 143 1587 27 Lane group capacity, c 180 132 134 284 187 2071 936 162 2071 936 • v/c ratio, X 0.91 0.85 0.70 0.82 0.62 K27.O13.3 1 0.88 0.77 0.03 Total green ratio, g/C 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.69 9 0.69 0.59 0.59 Uniform delay, di 59.9 61.8 61.0 53.4 21.2 44.2 21.1 11.8 1.000 1.0001.000 1.000 1.000 00 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.43 0.38 0.27 0.36 0.20 0.50 0.50. 0.41 0.50 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 42.7 37.6 15.2 17.2 6.2 14.7 0.5 39.2 2.8 0.1 Initial queue delay, 03 Control delay 102.6 . 1 99.3 76.2 170.6 27.4 141.7 113.8 83.4 23.8 11.9 Lane group LOS F F E E C I D B F C B Approach delay 102.6 79.1 38.6 28.5 Approach LOS F E D C Intersection delay 40.9 Xc = 0.94 Intersection LOS D HCS2000'M Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d • HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information • Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Baxter Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/5/2005 Jurisdiction MDT/COB Time Period Existing PM Peak Analysis Year 2005 Project ID Lowe's Volume and Timinct Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 73 27 Ill 107 85 173 89 1164 29 41 889 40 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.82 0.87 0.64 0.91 0.73 0.85 0.95 0.53 Pretimed (P)or actuated (A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/ RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking PJ 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0J 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G = 20.0 G = G = G = G = 30.0 G = G = G = Timing Y = 6 Y = Y = Y = IY= 7 Y = Y = Y = Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 63.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination . EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 88 171 184 303 139 1319 48 1011 Lane group capacity, c 297 528 388 540 196 1678 120 1668 v/c ratio, X 0.30 0.32 0.47 0.56 0.71 0.79 0.40 0.61 Total green ratio, g/C 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Uniform delay, d, 16.2 16.4 1 17.3 17.9 13.0 13.8 10.7 12.1 1.000 1.000 i.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF • • Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 2.5 1.6 4.1 4.2 19.5 3.8 9.7 1.6 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 18.7 18.0 21.4 22.0 32.5 17.6 20.3 13.8 Lane group LOS 8 B C C C B C B Approach delay 18.2 21.8 19.0 14.1 Approach LOS B C B B Intersection delay 17.8 X� = 0.70 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d • • HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Baxter • Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/51'2005 Jurisdiction MDT/COB Time Period Opening PM Peak adjusted Analysis Year 2006 Project ID Lowe's Volume and Timinct In Du EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L T R L TR L TR Volume, V(vph) 80 40 122 118 1104 222 98 1280 32 76 978 44 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 .0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.75 0.82 0.64 0.82 0.87 0.64 0.91 0.73 0.85 0.95 0.53 Pretimed (P)or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike/ RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/ Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min.time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G = 20.0 G = G = G = G = 5.0 G = 35.0 G = G = Timing Y= 6 IY= Y= Y= IY= 7 Y = 7 Y = Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 96 202 184 127 255 153 1451 89 1112 Lane group capacity, c 318 419 273 475 400 234 1542 206 1532 • v/c ratio, X 0.30 0.48 0.67 0.27 10.64 0.65 0.94 0.43 0.73 Total green ratio, g/C 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.59 0.44 0.59 0.44 Uniform delay, di 24.3 25.6 27.1 24.1 26.8 11.7 21.5 14.8 18.5 1.000 1.000 1 .000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF • • Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.11 0.22 0.23 0.45 0.11 0.29 • Incremental delay, d2 0.5 0.9 6.4 0.3 3.4 6.4 11.7 1.5 1.8 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 24.9 26.5 33.5 24.4 130.1 18.2 133.2 1 16.3 120.3 Lane group LOS C C C C C 8 C B C Approach delay 25.9 29.9 31.8 20.0 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 27.2 X = 0.86 Intersection LOS C C HCS2000TM. Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d • • HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Baxter • Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 5/5/2005 Jurisdiction MDT/City Time Period Analysis Year 2015 Project ID Without Lowe's Volume and Timina In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 95 35 144 139 111 225 1122 1595 40 56 1218 55 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.82 0.87 0.64 0.91 0.73 0.85 0.95 0.53 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped/Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/ Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 15.0 G = G = G = G = 45.0 G = G = G = Y= 6 1 Y = Y = Y = Y= 7 Y = Y = Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 73.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 114 223 240 394 191 1808 66 1386 Lane group capacity, c 103 342 204 350 165 2172 103 2159 • v/c ratio, X 1.11 0.65 1.18 1.13 1.16 0.83 0.64 0.64 Total green ratio, g/C 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 Uniform delay, di 29.0 26.6 29.0 29.0 14.0 11.0 8.9 8.9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 120.4 9.3 118.7 86.6 118.8 3.9 26.7 1.5 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 149.4 135.9 1 147.7 115.6 132.8 14.9 35.6 10.4 Lane group LOS F D F F F 8 D 8 Approach delay . 74.3 127.8 26.2 11.5 Approach LOS F F C 8 Intersection delay 39.6 X = 1.16 Intersection LOS D c HCS2000TM Copyright(D 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d • HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst DPD Intersection N19th and Baxter • Agency or Co. MMI Area Type All other areas Date Performed 51512005 Jurisdiction MDT/City Time Period PM Peak Adjusted Analysis Year 2015 Project ID Lowe's Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume, V(vph) 95 83 144 139 178 293 122 1595 40 104 1218 55 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.8_3 0.75 0.82 0.58 0.82 0.87 0.64 0.91 0.73 0.85 0.95 0.53 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) P P P P P P P P P P P P Start-up lost time, I, [2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped /Bike/RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/ Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing WB Only EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 10.0 G = 15.0 G = G = G = 10.0 G = 65.0 G = G = Y= 6 Y = 6 Y = Y = IY = 7 Y= 7 Y = Y= Duration of Analysis, T= 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 126.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 114 111 176 240 217 337 191 1808 122 1386 Lane group capacity, c 139 226 393 282 467 596 231 1818 202 1807 v/c ratio, X 0.82 0.49 0.45 0.85 0.46 0.57 0.83 0.99 0.60 0.77 Total green ratio, g/C 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.37 0.65 0.52 0.65 0.52 Uniform delay, di 54.2 51.9 40.2 146.5 140.4 31.4 27.5 30.3 31.6 24.4 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Progression factor, PF Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 • Incremental delay, d2 39.6 7.4 3.7 26.2 3.3 3.9 27.5 19.8 12.7 3.2 Initial queue delay, d3 - Control delay 93.8 59.4 43.9 72.7 43.7 35.2 55.0 50.2 44.3 27.6 Lane group LOS F E D E D D E D D C Approach delay 62.4 48.9 50.6 29.0 Approach LOS E D D C Intersection delay 44.4 XC = 0.94 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d • •I i o 0 I APPENDIX C LOWE S HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENTGUIDELINES AND EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS Lowe's Home Imprcvement*ehouse PUD Development Guidelines Development Guidelines for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD, Bozeman, Montana Introduction The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that a high quality design is maintained within the development of the Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse (Lowe's) site. Attention shall be paid to the overall planning of the site, in order to optimize the visual aesthetics of the building and site work from the various view corridors around the site. Sensitive and responsible architectural, landscape and signage design will enhance the appearance of the Lowe's building. The Lowe's Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a PUD within the Saccoccia PUD. These Development Guidelines demonstrate planned unit development requirements for the Lowe's site. The Lowe's Site Plan must also adhere to the framework and Development Guidelines of the Saccoccia PUD. • The Lowe's lot shall be used only for retail and wholesale sales associated with Lowe's HIW, Inc. including building material/lumber sales, garden center sales and other home improvement sales. Lots 2 and 3 of the PUD shall adhere to uses defined in the Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines with the addition of medium to high density residential projects allowed in that portion of Lot 3 lying east of the north-south interior access road, with the conditional use approved by the City of Bozeman. Sections of this document that refer to specific uses that comply with the above statement are for illustration purposes only and not for the purpose of further restricting the use of the lot. This project also entails boundary relocation to fit the needs of the Lowe's Planned Unit Development. Similar to the Saccoccia PUD, Lot 1 will remain as the dominant lot, Lot 2 will consist of a smaller lot adjacent to Tschache Lane and Lot 3 will skirt Walton's Stream/Ditch. The Saccoccia PUD was filed without a first phase and it was assumed a boundary relocation would be necessary to secure lot specific tenants. Due to the fact that improvements and a building permit are proposed for the PUD, concurrent • construction of improvements in accordance with City of Bozeman Ordinance 1532 is required. 1 Lowe's Home Improvemen0arehouse PUD Development Guidelines A narrative addressing Ordinance 1532 will be submitted to the City during the site plan approval process. Site Planning and Phasing Improvements associated with this project include the installation of the north-south access road with boulevard trees adjacent to the Lowe's lot and construction of the "Lowe's Green", an approximate 39,000 SF developed open space sited to offer a pleasant place to stop for the Lowe's customers and employees as well as those of adjacent Bridger Peaks Town Center. Pedestrian trails and a sidewalk system will be installed to create a loop around the entire P.U.D., connecting to adjacent trails, properties and the stream corridor. Landscaping shall be installed concomitant with site plan development. A portion of the detention area shall be developed with this phase as required by site plan design. Per the guidelines set forth in the 1-90 Corridor section of the Design Objective Plan, the buildings and landscaping shall be organized into major groupings to enhance the scale and appearance of the development. Refer to the landscape design guidelines towards the end of this document. • Open Space Allocation Due to its location in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor, this project will be developed as a planned unit development and meet or exceed the respective open space requirements. The Saccoccia PUD acts as an overall open space plan and schematically depicts a minimum of 30% open space for the entire Saccoccia PUD. The Lowe's lot exhibits 3.75 acres open space with 8.21 acres distributed in other areas of the Saccoccia PUD. A portion of the Lowe's open space is distributed throughout the Saccoccia PUD to achieve a larger open space corridor along the Walton's Stream/Ditch and to create a larger buffer from Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane. The Final Site Plan of the Saccoccia PUD demonstrates the ability to obtain 30% open space via greenway, stream setback and other open space areas. . Lowe's Green shall be established as.a sanctuary for pedestrians, customers and employees. This area will be landscaped with significant quantities of trees and shrubs to provide shade and screening and will also include pedestrian benches, picnic tables,-simple play structures and • 2 • • Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • trail/sidewalk connections to the development and adjacent properties. On the proposed Concept Plan, the Green is shown south the of the Lowe's building adjacent to the garden center and Tschache Lane. Community Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Pedestrian/bike trails are integrated into the Lowe's development and extend into the Saccoccia PUD to create a loop. With this project, a trail located near the Walton Stream will be installed. Other trails and sidewalks include connections to Lowe's three building entries via large landscaped islands in the parking lot and a trail connection from Tschache Lane. Adjacent properties and projects will be connected by these pedestrian ways, including the new Hilton Hotel, Bridger Peaks Town Center and the Bridger Peaks Village to the south. Access The Lowe's PUD is accessed via two public road and two private roads. The public roads • include Tschache Lane to the south and Baxter Lane to the north. A private road along the western boundary of the PUD also provides access to the site at points as shown on the concept plan. This private road was installed with the development of the PUD on the property to the west and is located on a mutual access easement. The other private road connects Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane, bisecting the Saccoccia PUD. Building Design Guidelines Building character To ensure continuity within the development, it is important that all buildings be compatible with a consistent architectural character as with the existing Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines. To achieve this, these guidelines call for building forms, details; materials and colors that are intended to be compatible with, and complimentary to, the North 1 gtn Entryway Corridor. • Inspiration is drawn from Bozeman's historic architecture. Often eclectic, the buildings in old Bozeman incorporate architectural styles and features from many sources.and eras, 3 Lowe's Home ImprovemenTOvarehouse PUD Development Guidelines allowing for a broad range of design. The city's downtown serves as a vast resource of building styles, materials and color palettes: Many of these buildings incorporate pitch- • roofs, false fronts, entry canopies and unique profiles. Overall, the goal is to create a built environment that is designed to have clear order and comprehensive composition in design, scale, materials, color, detailing and landscaping. The building height restrictions were relaxed to allow for a maximum height of 48 feet in the Saccoccia PUD. This relaxation was supported by the desire to use adjacent buildings and individual building elements to provide contrast and variation against horizontal portions of the buildings and to emphasize entry points. Building massing Considerable thought has been given to the design of the proposed building facades to create interest while softening the scale of the otherwise large building footprint. Per the guidelines in North 1gth Corridor section of the Design Objective Plan, these • guidelines call for a building design that does not appear to be "standardized," or "franchise" in style. Articulation of building forms, both horizontally and vertically, have visually reduced the overall scale of the buildings and have added visual interest to the architectural composition. Building elevations are visually designed to be not more than 100' in length, by means of recesses, offsets, angular forms, and/or other features to provide visually interesting facades. Furthermore, the following building elements improve the massing and scale of . the building. Exceptions to these guidelines may be granted based on design merit or historical precedent: Roof Rooflines and profiles shall contribute to varied scale and massing. Pitched roof forms echo the mountains surrounding Bozeman while responding to the regional climatic conditions. Buildings in this development shall incorporate pitched roof forms in their appearances. Pitches between 3:12 and 12:12 are considered appropriate. Entire • 4 Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • buildings do not need to be covered with pitched roofs, but the entrance areas shall be emphasized in such a manner, as if a "false front" is applied. Distinctively shaped roof forms, detailed parapets, and exaggerated cornice lines shall also be used in the composition of a building. WkL-sE P:N*-r" - Eaves, soffits and fascias Sloped roof elements should have a horizontal eave • projection. Sloped roofs may have either eaves with p exposed rafter tails or enclosed soffits. On major roof forms, enclosed soffits are preferred. Where exposed �� rafter tails are used, they shall be set back from the /MTA, F roof edge and should be cut square to the roof slope. ^"e ' All roof edges with enclosed soffits shall have a fascia. Fascias are not necessary for roof edges with exposed rafters. Gutters, downspouts, snow stops Gutters on roof edges are permitted and are required to match the roof color at the enclosed soffit conditions, or the wood rafter color when exposed rafters are used. Exposed downspouts are permitted, but care is to be exercised when composing the building elevations so that they become a part of an integral design. Snow stops shall be • used on all sloped metal roof forms where roof edges are above or near pedestrian 5 • Lowe's Home Improvementarehouse PUD Development Guidelines walkways. They need to be unobtrusive in appearance and match the color of the sloped • roof. 6�� �wn�vT� ��ttsd �jtbPt' 'I'b i:/t^PftA5126 �Y }{tloFtl,t�tYiS 8N'rtLY Roof mounted equipment Rooftop mechanical equipment, including but not limited to HVAC units, vents and other major penetrations, shall be screened. Screening shall be provided through the use of raised parapets around the building, or by rooftop screening elements that are consistent with the building's design. Penetrations and all other exposed elements in sloped roofs • are to be painted to match the roof color. Canopies Canopies shall be used where feasible, to shelter entry doors and give definition to building planes. Sloped canopies, and canopies supported by diagonal rods with wall mounted connector plates are both acceptable. • 6 • • Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • ^rOcPubf'IN� pUE1E A;Y N,elft CAWrY W IUL Exterior walls Building walls shall not be longer than 100' without modulating the fagade. This can be accomplished by offsetting wall planes, changing wall materials, adding canopies/overhangs/trellises, or as approved for design merit. Changing the roofline to reinforce the fagade modulation is encouraged. Buildings shall have a distinct "base" at the ground level, using different materials, colors or textures to provide distinction. All • facades shall be designed with comprehensive composition and clear order, highlighting entry points, highlighting or screening appropriate building functions, reflecting the building program while respecting important visual perspectives both on site and off site. Storefront windows and doors The sizes, shapes and materials of storefront windows and doors have a significant visual effect on the building elevation design. To complement the development's overall aesthetics, the storefronts shall be made of anodized aluminum with clear insulated- glazing suitable to the local climate. 7 Lowe's Home Improveme*n arehouse PUD Development Guidelines Openings may have square or shallow arched tops. Generally arched top openings • should be used judiciously to highlight areas of particular importance or to complement the design composition. Glass above the typical 7' door height is desirable to increase the amount of interior daylight and to reduce the amount of unglazed exterior wall surface. Screeninq Trash enclosure, as well as ground level ac- equipment such as transformers, satellite • dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be i screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that � complement the building design. Materials and colors • Much like the historic buildings of Bozeman, the sensitive use of multiple materials is a desirable approach to creating richness in architectural character. Acceptable materials within the development are EIFS, brick and thin-set veneer brick, metal siding and roofing, precast concrete, colored CMU blocks, stone and simulated stone veneer. It is preferable that these materials be complimentary to the materials and colors as specified below. Earth tone colors with complimentary accents shall be the bases for all color schemes in the P.U.D. The color and material schedules submitted with the Site Plans shall provide inspiration in the design of the buildings for the development. The material and color palettes for individual projects will be judged in terms of their compatibility with the overall character of the development. • 8 Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • Exterior lighting Lighting fixtures used on this development must comply with Section 18.42.150 "Lighting" of the City Uniform Development Code and contribute to the overall style of the development. The light fixtures shall be shielded to prevent direct illumination from falling on adjacent properties. Metal Halide lighting at appropriate levels will enhance the appearance of the buildings and grounds while promoting security. The lantern style light fixture, as depicted in attachment to the Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines, shall only be used along the interior portions of the development. This fixture type will have meet cutoff requirements while presenting a historical character. The architectural features of the building exterior shall include bell shaped light fixtures. These • bell shaped fixtures shall be mounted with "gooseneck" arms. °6005e NECK`ARM WALL MOUNT 6 BELL 5t1APE0 HOOD Pedestrian oriented architecture The P.U.D. concept plan demonstrates coordination between vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Pedestrian corridors shall be provided between the phases, parcels, buildings and adjacent properties. The corridors provided for pedestrian circulation . within the subdivision shall be enhanced with landscaping and constructed with • crosswalks designated with pavers'or stamped concrete across vehicular lanes. 9 Lowe's Home I roveme0arehouse PUD Development Guidelines • p p Outdoor recreational areas such as landscaped areas, open spaces, trails and picnic areas • shall be provided for the use and enjoyment of employees, customers and.the public. Refer to attached lighting, tree grate, bench and bike rack cut sheets. Landscape Guidelines The landscape design for the Lowe's Planned Unit Development will comply with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance and the landscape requirements as defined by the Saccoccia PUD Development Guidelines. The landscape design contributes significantly to the Baxter Lane and North 19th Avenue corridors. Wide landscape buffers are designed to tie this development to others in the area and provide comfortable open space for pedestrian circulation. Plant selections submitted with this Site Plan shall provide the development with a sense of unity internally as well as compliment surrounding developments. The design shall. provide for seasonal interest, a variety of experiences for center users. The plantings will be combined with berms and swales to create topographical interest where appropriate. • The specific design guidelines as defined below may be altered within the framework of this PUD based on design merit and with the requirement being that the overall concept must be maintained throughout the development and the.landscape points must be attained. Landscaping on each lot must meet or-exceed the minimum requirements outlined in the zoning ordinance in order to achieve the higher quality of design expected with a PUD. These requirements are outlined in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Entryway Corridor Plan, which reflect design intentions for.planned unit developments. Due to the project location, this planned unit development must adhere to the Greenway Corridor Landscape Standards. Further, this project will exceed minimum landscape standards, which is expected for large format retail projects. General Landscape Guidelines To reduce or eliminate the dependence on treated city water, on-site wells will be installed for irrigation purposes in the event that the City of Bozeman can successfully apply for receive 10 Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • permit to install irrigation wells in the Bozeman Solvent Site. Larger tree and shrub plantings, combined with complete irrigation, will be utilized for an immediate landscape impact. At this time, landscaping for the Lowe's PUD will follow the Landscape Plan as shown on the proposed Concept Plan. Landscape improvements will include extensive landscaping throughout the project. Landscaping outside of the Lowe's project will include the Walton's Stream/Ditch trail corridor, landscape groupings at the two access points on Baxter Lane and the three access points on Tschache Lane, and along the southern lot line of Lot 2. Tschache Lane Frontage Important considerations for this area include the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by the formal arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold'), or other suitable species, at 50-foot intervals along Tschache Lane. To the inside of this line of trees additional buffering of parking lots will be created by natural, rolling berms planted with groups of Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens), Thunderchild Flowering Crab • (Malus 'Thunderchild'), and Spring Snow Crab (Malus 'Spring Snow') or other suitable species. The yard landscaping points shall be met with groups of large evergreen trees, small ornamental trees and large canopy trees for each 50 lineal feet, in addition to the street trees. Turf grass would be present around these plantings. The plantings and berms present in the greenway create a variety of visual experiences for pathway users. All plantings shall be placed with consideration as to path use and safety, visibility into the parking lot for security personnel, view corridors, terminated vistas, and appropriate screening for the adjacent developments. Plant selection ties to the Bridger Peaks development by repeating the use of the Black Ash as street trees but creates variety and a unique identity by using Flowering Crabs. Creativity shall be encouraged in the plantings, and entrance focal points will be created. In these cases, clusters of evergreen and deciduous shrubs may be used to assist in creating focal point plantings. West Property Line Buffer This buffer strip will utilize berming, trees and shrubs to screen and separate parking and • structures. Planting space is limited due to extensive utilities running along this corridor. Plantings are designed to accommodate these concerns while still providing screening and 11 Lowe's Home Improveme*arehouse PUD Development Guidelines • separation. This buffer will enhance the visual perception of the development from North 19tn • Avenue. Part of the plant palette will be used to carry the planting around the corner to the north and visually tie this buffer to the Baxter Lane plantings. The landscaping shall tie Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane together and provide accent at the drive connections to the adjoining project and to avoid underground and overhead utilities. Baxter Lane Landscaping This landscape buffer will enhance visual perspectives of the development from Interstate 90. Baxter Lane will be lined with a formal street tree arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold') or other suitable species. The large expanse of greenspace will utilize evergreen and deciduous trees and will utilize rolling berms to create a park-like setting.The plant palette may include Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens), Quaking- Aspen (Populus tremuloides), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Canada Red Cherry (Prunus virginiana 'Canada Red'). The detention area will be designed with an irregular perimeter and be revegetated with native species as described in the General Landscape Guidelines above. For this project, the landscaping along Baxter Lane will include landscaped groupings at the i access points to the Saccoccia PUD. Stream Corridor The steam corridor along the eastern property line will be afforded significant setback and may be further separated from the development by a building access drive. A pathway is planned for this area to allow pedestrian access from the development as well as adjacent properties. Plantings should be limited to native species of trees and shrubs to enhance the riparian nature of the corridor. The planting of native grasses is also encouraged in this area. It is desirable to leave the native grasses unmown thereby enhancing the feel of a natural stream bank community. 12 • • Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • Interior Parking Lot The parking lot layout shall provide for traffic control, shading and pedestrian access. Japanese Tree Lilac (Syringa reticulata), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Prairie Spire Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Rugby') are trees that may be utilized in the parking lot islands. Pedestrian Use Areas Pedestrian access shall be provided throughout the development. Concrete walks are to be provided along Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane with lateral extensions into the site. A minimum 6-foot wide pedestrian path shall be provided along the stream to the east. This path shall meet the requirements for city standard natural fines trails.. A primary pedestrian access shall be provided through the site and shall consist of concrete sidewalks and at-grade marked pedestrian crossings connecting on site entry points, pedestrian destinations and off site developments.. • Building Envelope The Lowe's building will include plantings to soften and enhance the architecture, sufficiently screen service and utilities from the street. General locations for these plantings shall be determined through Site Plan Review and shown on a landscape plan. Materials shall include some of the species used in the overall development, but some variety will be allowed for individual expression and identity. A landscape plan will be required for these pad sites. The landscape design provides a strong unifying element to the overall design of the development. *All plant varieties suggested are to act as a guideline. As new, improved cultivars are developed variation from the listed varieties will be allowed. Submitted by Shelly Engler, Landscape Architect, Cashman Nursery, December 21, 2004; Modified 5/20/2005 • 13 Lowe's Home Improveme*arehouse PUD Development Guidelines • Si-gna-ge -guidelines • City Staff and Commission shall review the signage for this lot during the Site Plan Review process. All signage within the Lowe's PUD must adhere to the framework of the following signage guidelines; however, each individual signage proposal shall be reviewed independently. The Vision and Intention for this Signaqe Proposal Proposed signage is designed to be aesthetically superior in form, efficient in function, limited in quantity and non-interruptive. It is the goal to provide signage which is not only completely compatible with the materials used on the complex buildings (e.g. brick, E.I.F.S., 40 year metal for roofing), but to enhance the overall aesthetics of the project. We propose to accomplish this through compatible and complimentary designs, materials, lettering, colors and lighting. Lighting is to be limited, diffused and used only where direction is required or aesthetics persuade. Proposed Signaqe will be of Three Categories: Pylons, Wall Signaqe, and Pad Signaqe Pylons: A single sign with primary tenant/occupant panels will be the main I.D. for the whole complex. There will be a second, lesser pylon sign with secondary tenant panels and a separate monument sign approximately half the size of the main pylon with secondary tenant panels. The main I.D. sign is shown in attached drawing. The primary pylon and monument will utilize internally illuminated fluorescents to light logo graphics. The pylon and monument will have similar materials, which will match building construction. The upper title cabinets and lower tenant cabinets will be constructed of metal and steel materials, will be painted and provided with lexan faces with 3M vinyl graphics. Internal fluorescents will illuminate the secondary tenant I.D. signs. The support columns will be of brick construction, designed to compliment the buildings in the project. There will be a limited number of smaller non-illuminated entrance directionals placed appropriately for pedestrian and traffic control. A monument type directional may be considered • 14 0 • Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD Development Guidelines • should more than one tenant occupy a pad site. These signs will be addressed as needed during site plan review. Locations of exterior and entryway pylon signs are shown on enclosed map. Wall and Pad Signage: There are two types of wall signs permitted in this PUD: 1) Primary wall signage will be wall mount, tenant I.D. signage mounted to the individual building walls of the complex. The signs would be custom fabricated using pan channel individual letters with aluminum returns, back lit with neon, acrylic faces with trim cap and non exposed mounting hardware. Additional options would be custom shaped cabinets fabricated of aluminum painted to match building colors, with acrylic faces and applied 3M translucent vinyl graphics with various colors compatible to the building facade. Lighting would be fluorescent lamps. All tenant copy will be of a contemporary font, with the exception that a registered trade mark or letter style, logo and colors may be used. 2) Secondary wall signage will be provided to efficiently direct the public. These are to be limited and appropriately placed as projecting wall blade signs. These will be custom fabricated with painted aluminum frames and panels and 3M vinyl graphics to match building colors. 3) All pad signage shall be restricted to wall signage with the exception of the approved pylon signs. All site plans shall submit a wall signage package that must comply with these guidelines and the City of Bozeman signage design regulations. Signaqe Summary: Tenants are to be encouraged to be creative in their use of colors, shapes and graphic applications within the project guidelines and boundaries. Each tenant shall be required to submit scale drawings with specifications and color artwork for written landlord approval. • H:\3373\003\Docs\preapp\Lowe's PUD DevGuide.doc 15 EauBntBnta.CoveneNB,Contlf end ReeUktbm V4—Boorman,MT 11111111111111111111� I III I�I�I II I II I Zr�3 r 11 YMllw Van49-0A119Un Co MT MSJC 05.06 EASEMENTS COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THESE EASEMENTS, COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS(hereinafter referred to as"ECCR'), are made and entered into as of the date of the last execution hereof,which dale Is the 3"dday of t=c R%& mLv ,204-py PHILIP SACCOCCIA,JR `t WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Philip Saccoccla, Jr, Is the owner of a certain tract of land located in the City of Bozeman,Gallatin County,Montana,which Is more parileulatly described In Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; NOW,THEREFORE, Philip Saccocela, Jr, does hereby declare that all of the parcels within the bounds of the real property described on EXbB&A shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following easements, restrictions, covenants and conditions which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of.and which shell run with the real property and be binding on all parties having any right,title or Interest In the described properties or any part thereof, their heirs,successors and assigns and shall Inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. ARTICLE I BASIC DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 "Owner"shall mean and refer to the record owner,whether one or more persons or entities,of a fee simple fide to any parcel which is a part of the Properties,as hereinafter defined, but excluding those having such Interest merely as security for the performance of any obligation, Section 1.2 'Parcel'shall mean and refer to any parcel of land shown on Exhibit A ARTICLE It EASEMENTS mac ion 2.1 Definitions and Documentation. For the purposes of this Article,the following will • aPPIY (a) A Party granting an easement is called the'Grantor', it being intended that the grant shall thereby bind and Include not only such Parity but also its successors and assigns. (b) A Party to whom the easement Is granted Is called the "Grantee", It being intended that the grant shall benefit and Include not only such Party but Its successors, assigns, occupants and parmittaee;although not for the direct benefit of permlttees,the Grantee may permit from time to time its occupants and permittees to use such easements; provided, however, that no such permlSSion nor the division of the dominant eskste shall permit or result In a use of the easement In excess of the use contemplated at the date of the creation of such easement. (c) . The.term "Building(s)" means the building(s)which has (have) been,will be or may be constructed within a Party's Permissible Building Area, (as that term is hereinafter defined in Section 2.1(i),but such term does not Include parking,drives,sidewalks or landscaping. (d) The term"Common Utility Facilities"means utility systems and facilities from time to Uma situated on or serving the Properties,up to the building wall of any Building,for use or service in common by both Parties such as the following: storm drainage, retention and disposal facilities and sanitary sewer systems,manholes,underground domestic and fire protection water systems,underground natural gas systems, underground electric power cables and systems, underground telephone and television cables and systems,and all other utility systems and facilities for such common use or service, .Including, without limitation, those installed under the provisions of this ECCR and as replacements thereto. (a) The term"Improvements' means Buliding(e), the parking areas, access drives, landscaping and related appurtenances on a Parcel. 1 ..�,CwOordlbm and Raaulcnam Vd_Bozeman NT I Illllf IIIII IIII 111111*1111111111111111111111 2139990.: of 11 11M116Y Varm.-06114tln to KT R19C 'S.aa (f) The word"in"with respect to an easement granted"In"a particular Parcel means, as the context may require,"In","to","on","over","through","upon",'across",and"Under",or any one or more of the foregoing, • (g) The term"Party"means Philip Saccoccla.Jr.or any successor person(s) (h) The term"Permissible Building Area"means an area'designated as such on the Site Plan within which a Building of a certain size and height may be constructed as hereinafter more fully provided.No building or structure shall be erected or maintained outside of a Permissible Building Area. (1) The term "Separate Utility Facilities" means any of the following not installed under the terms of this ECCR and not for use In common by other Partles:storm drainage facilities,and sanitary sewer systems (Including, without limitation, underground storm and sanitary sewer systems), underground domestic and fire protection water systems,underground natural gas systems,under ground electric power, cables and systems, underground telephone and television cables and systems, and all other utility systems and facilities reasonably necessary for the use or service of any Improvement(as that term is hereinafter defined In Section 2.1(f))situated on any Parcel. (I) Except as provided in this ECCR,all easements granted herein are non-exclusive and are Irrevocable and perpetual. (k) All easements herein shall be easements appurtenant and not easements in gross, (1) In the event a Party transfers or conveys a portion of Its Parcel In accordance with the terms of this ECCR,those easements granted under this Article 2 which benefit,bind,and burden the remainder of the parcel not transferred or conveyed shall benefit, bind,end burden the portion of the Parcel so transferred or conveyed,and those easements granted under this Article 2 which benefit,bind, and burden the portion so transferred or conveyed shall benefit, bind, and burden the remainder of the Parcel of which It was a part. (m) All easements granted hereunder attall exist by virtue or this EGGR,without the necessity of confirmation by any other document. Likewise, upon the termination of any easement (In whole or In part)or Its release In respect of all or any part of any Parcel, in accordance with the terms hereof, the some shall be deemed to have been terminated or released without the necessity of • confirmation by any other document.However,upon the request of a Party,the other Parties will sign and acknowledge a document memorializing the existence(including the location and any conditions),or the termination(In whole or In part),or the release(In whole or in part),es the case may be,of any easement, If the form and substance of the document is approved by the other Parties. No grant of an easement pursuant to this Article 2 shall impose any greater obligation on any Party to construct or maintain its ButIding except as expressly provided in this ECCR. Section 2.2 Access Roads.Parties agree not to obstruct or Interfere in any way with the free flow of pedestrlan and vahieulsr traffic over Access Roads except to the extent necessary to prevent a dedication thereof or the accrual of any prescriptive rights to any Person therein; Upon the commencement of construction of any Building or parking area on any Parcels)Parties or any assignees thereof shall pay Its pro rate share of the reasonably necessary maintenance,repair, and replacement costs of Common Utility Facilities Including Common Access Roads with related appurtenances. The pro rats share shall be determined by the total square footage of the size of each Parcel with Improvements as the numerator and the total square footage of the combined Parcels with Improvements as the denominator. Expenses shall be shared according to pro-reta share based upon size of Parcels with Improvements. Section 2.3 Easements for Utility Facilities. Each Party hereby grants to the other Parties perpetual easements to its(Grantor's)Parcel,except within such Party's Permissible Building Area,for the -Installation,use, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, relocation and removal of Common Utility Facilities and Separate Utility Facilities serving a parcel of the Grants% All Separate Utility Facilities Installed,whether Installed under this Section or otherwise, and all Common Utility Facilities, shall be underground If reasonably possible and the location of the 2 • ���I��1N�till 2139990 Emmenv,Gov�NM,Contllll�a ReeMctiv„e va_bozeno�Mr 1111111111111111111111���� I ill 9 ofil mzIBB12000 ea:SBP iihrllW Vgnu—c•llatln a.MT NI/C e6.00 Separate Utility Facilities shall be subject to the approval of the Party across whose Parcel the same are • to be located. Except as otherwlse provided herein, the Grantee of any easement for Separate Utility Facilities under this Section shall be responsible, as between such Grantee and the Grantor, for the Installation,maintenance,repair and removal at Grantee's cost of all Separate Utility Facilities installed by the Grantee pursuant to the easement grant, as well as•for all separate Utility Facilities installed by the Grantee on its own parcel. Any such Installation, maintenance, repair, replacement, relocation and removal of Separate Utility Facilities shall be performed by Grantee only after thirty (30)days advance notice to Grantor of Grantee's Intention to do such work.However,in the case of an emergency,any such work may be Immediately performed after giving such advance notice to Grantor as la practicable under the circumstances. In addition, the Parties agree that all such Installation, maintenance, repair and removal shall be performed In a manner that causes an little disturbance to Grantor as may be practicable under the circumstances and any and all portions of the surface area of Grantors Parcel which may have been excavated,damaged or otherwise disturbed se-e result of such work shell be restored, at the sole coat and expense of Grantee, to essentially the same condition as the same were in prior to the commencement of any such work. The Grantee shall defend,Indemnify and hold Grantor harmless from and against any and all liens, losses,liabilities, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees), incurred in connection with Grantee's use of the Separate UtIllty Facilities easements under this Section 2.4,except to the extent occasioned by Grantor's negligent or wrongful act or omission to act. The Grantor of any easement for Separate Utility Facilities under this Section 2.3 may use the utility facilities Installed pursuant to such easement; provided, however, that the increase in costs Incurred In order.to make such utility facilities adequate to serve Grantor's additional use shall be borne by such Grantor; and provided, further, that Grantor gives written notice within the time period called for under subparagraph(a)and otherwise complies with the requirements of subparagraphs(b),(c)and(d)of the following pwagraph of this Section 2.3, The Grantor of any easement under this Section 2.3 may relocate on Its Parcel any • Separate Utility Facilities or Common Utility Facilities Installed thereon under any easement granted by it; provided,however,that such relocation: (a) may be performed only after Grantor has given Grantee thirty(30)days'written notice of its inleition to relocate such facilities; (b) shall not Interfere with or diminish the utility services to the Grantee (however. temporary Interferences with and diminutions In utility services shall be permitted If they occur during the non-business hours of the Grantee, and Grantee has been so noted under Subsection 2.3(a). Grantor shall promptly reimburse Grantee for all costs, expenses and losses incurred by Grantee as a result of such interferences or diminutions,or both.); (0) shall not reduce or unreasonably impair the usefulness or function of the facilities in question; (d) shall be located underground,and reasonably possible;and (e) shall be performed without cost or expense to Grantee,and, if Common Utility ,Facilities or Separate Utility racllities which provide service le the Grantee are involved, In accordance with plans approved by the Grantee and Grantor, Unless otherwise agreed to herein, nothing herein shall be construed to grant any Party the right to utilize or draln Into any detention facilities or retention located on any other Party's Parcel, Sectlon 2.4 DumtIon. The duration of the easements granted under this Section shall be coterminous with the respective provisions of the ECCR which give the Grantee the right or the obligation to perform the work described In this Section. Section 2.5 Abandonment of Easements.After the expiration of the term of this ECCR, the perpetual easements granted In Sections 2.3 and 2.4 hereof,or all or any part or parts thereof,may be abandoned and terminated. If the use thereof shall have ceased and cessation thereof eandhues for a continuous period of rive(5)years.Thereafter the then record owner of the fee of the Parcel burdened EBeemenW,Co ltlone and Raur.wm.Va_anzemnn,MT I�IIII���IIIIIII�IIIlll�l llill III I�IIIII II II 0 2 ,0,2094 U MP 8h.11w Vuw.-Grrltsrin Co rrr MISO IIII da.CO with such easement may give written notice by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, malled to the then record owner of the fee of the Parcel benefited by such easement and the then record owner, if any,of any leasehold interest In such benefited Parcel, stating that such easement has been • abandoned and may place of record in the Real Property Records of Gallatin County, Montana, an affidavit that such abandonment has taken place and that such notice has been properly given.If the then record owner of the fee of the benefited Parcel falls.to-place of record in the Real Property Records of Gallatin County, Montana, within ninety (90) days after the giving of such notice, an affidavit that such easement has not ceased to be used for such continuous five (5) year period, such easement shall thereupon be conclusively deemed abandoned and any person having or thereafter acquiring an interest in the Parcel previously burdened shall hold and take such Interest free of and unencumbered by such easement. Section 2.7 Fasements to Public,Utilities.Any grant or other conveyance of an easement to a public utility by Grantor on Its Parcel shall, without necessity of further recital In the conveyancing instrument,be deemed to Inolude,the following conditions,covenants and restrictions to which such publlc Why and its successors shall be bound unless specifically stated otherwise in such Instrument. (a) The easement Is non-exclusive; (b) All facilities installed pursuant to the easement shall be underground,except for manhole and manhole covers which shall be flush with adjacent grade,and except as otherwise shown on plans approved by Grantor; (c) Grantor retains the right to use the surface areas as Grantor sees fit; (d) Grantor reserves the right to require Grantee to relocate Its facilities(and vacate the easement)to another location on Grahlor's Parcel,subject to the conveyance of a similar easement, all at Grantor's cost and expense; (a) Grantee shall not, In Its use or Installation, interfere with other Installations and easements In the area; (f) Grantee shall protect its facilities against uses of the surface made by Grantor and others; (g) Grantee shall make adequate provisions for the safety and convenience of all • persons using the area; ' (h) Grantee,following Installation or other work, shall replace and restore the areas and improvements to the condition in which they were immediately prior to performance of such Installation and work; (i) Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Grantor against all loss, liability, and costs(including reasonable attorney's fees)which may result to Grantor from the negligent act or omission of,its agents,employees and contractors;and 0) Grantee shalt not permit any claim. Hen or encumbrance to atlach against Grantor's Parcel or any Interest therein. Section 2.8 No Barrier Agreement. No barriers,fences,grade changes or other obstructions shall be erected so as to impede or interfere in any way with the free flow of vehicular and pedestrian traffic between those portions of the Properties from time to time devoted to pedestrian access,vehicular roadways or parking area,or in any manner unreasonably restrlet or interfere with the use and enjoyment by either of the Parties of the rights and easements created by this Article It.The preceding sentence shall hot prohibit the reasonable designation and relocation of traffic and pedestrian lanes. ARTICLE III RESTRICTIONS Section 3.13.1 Land Use and Use and Buildinb ypg, Every Parcel shall be used only for retail and wholesale sales and service businesses and other uses allowed in B2 and M1 zoning districts,Including but not limited to retail and wholesale uses, service shops, financial institutions, offices, restaurants, convenience uses, hotelstmotels, entertainment and recreational uses, health and exercise uses, 4 0 1 11 Qy '�1fge 2139990 Eeaemen=,eovenama,conftanf arlQ R"Lriclione V4—Bowman,M7 I��III I�IIIIH II,III,I III 02/00/2000 03 AMP 19h.11SV Veno—Oall.tlr,Co RT Rr9C III!!! 00.00 wholesale storage and warehousing,iechnologyireaearch uses,light manufacturing, and auto, boat, and • recreational vehicle sales and service. Section 3.2 CorriDletioas of Improvements. Weather permitting, all paving and landscaping will be finished upon completion of the construction of any building on the Propertles,but in no event shall It be installed later than one hundred twenty(120)days after the building is occupied. Section 3.3 Nulsoncer. Subject to the provisions of Section 31, no Parcel shall be used for anything other than purposes which may be permitted by applicable zoning regulations,nor shall anything be done on any Parcel which shall constitute a public nuisance to the community. Section 3.4 Use Restrictions. (a) During the term of this ECCR no portion of the Properties may be used for any of the following putpoaea without the written consent of Philip Saccoccia,Jr. W A tavern, bar,nightclub,cocktail lounge,discotheque, dance hall, or any other establishment selling alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption; provided, however, the foregoing shall not prohibit the operation of a restaurent with the sale of alcoholic beverages therein. (ll) A bowling alley,billiard parlor,bingo parlor,arcade or game room unless such arcade or game room is incidental to s'permitted use herein. (III) A flea market or pawnshop, (b) During the term of this ECCR,no portion of the Properties may ever be used for any of the following uea6 whatsoever: (i) An adult type bookstore or other establishment selling,renting,displaying or exhibiting pornographic or obscene materials (Including wi(houl limitation: magazines, books,movies, videos, photographs or so called "sexual toys') or providing adult type entertainment or activities (Including, without limitation, any displays of a variety involv!ng, Ohibiting or depicting sexual themes, nudity or lewd acts,except where part of a video leasing retailer,substantially similar to,but not limited to, Blockbuster or Hollywood Video or a bookseller,substantially similar,but not limited to,Barnes and Noble or Borders. (ii) A message psdar. • (Ili) A skating rink. (Iv) A mortuary,crematorium or funeral home. (v) A moblle home or trailer court,labor camp,junkyard or stockyard. (VI) A land fill, garbage dump or for.the dumping, disposing, incineration or reduction of garbage. Section 3.8 Outparcel Developments..Any Outparcel sold or developed on the Properties will only be developed under the following guidelines: (a) (b) Any rooftop equipment shall be screened.In a reasonably satisfactory manner. (c) No rooftop signs shall be erected. (d) A freestanding identification sign may be erected but In no event shall such freestanding Identification sign block the visibility of other buildings,the monument sign or the pylon sign. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there may be erected entrance-exit signs to facilitate the free flow of traffic,which entrance"extt signs shall be of a monument type. (a) Any Oulparcel shall be kept neat, orderly, planted In grass and trimmed until Improved and constructed. (f) No buildings shall be constructed In area labeled"No Build Area"on the Site Plan. (g) Any party or Independent owner having an ownership or leasehold Interest in an . Outparcel shall repair any damage caused to any of the utility facilities,as described in Section 2.3 of this ECCR, serving the Properties and the Outparcel caused by such party, or a lessee or user of the Outp2mal,to the extent the Outparcel benefits from any of the utility facilities serving the Properties and the Outparcei. • 5 Ens MWILr—AWdnlons.ndRestdolialev4-Bozeman.Nr , ! III����I�lilII��I I� llfI�1IIIIIIII�IIIIIIII z 091221114$999OQ g}l.11.y y.n..-g.11.tin.Go Mr Mtge 06.03 Any of the restrictions set forth in this Section 3.6 may be waived, amended, modified, released, or terminated in writing at any time and from time to time.The fee owner of an Outparcel, however, may Impose additional, restrictions on an Outparcel as such fee owner shall deem to be appropriate, subject to any exceptions thereto imposed on said fee Owner at the time of conveyance of said Outparoel. The foregoing restrictions and agreements are Imposed on each of the Outparcels for the benefit of the Properties. The agreements, restrictions and covenants herein made shall be deemed restrictive covenants running with the land and shall be binding upon each of the Outparceis and any person who may from time to time own,lease,or otherwise have an interest In any of the Oulparcels. ARTICLE IV PARKING&SIGNACF &ctlori 4.1 Parking Reculrements. The Properties, including all Outparcels, shall each be -self-supporting and self parked with respect to parking and shell each contain (lie number of parking spaces required by applicable law. Section 4.2 UAQu1 end.or Pkjgn j1goa0. Philip Saccoccia, Jr, hereby grants a parmanard easement to install,construct and maintain a freestanding pylon slgh in the area shown on the Site Plan as the Pylon Sign Easement Area" and a monument sign In the area shown on the Site Plan as the 'Monument Sign Easement Area." Should Parties elect to have one or-more panels,Parties or any assignees thereof shall pay'its pro rate snare of all installation,construction and maintenance costs associated with the Pylon Sign and the Monument Sign,The pro rata share shall be determined by the total square footage of the size of the face of the panel as the numerator and the total square footage of the combined faces of all sign panels on the Pylon Sign or the Monument Sign as the denominator, ARTICLE V DEFAULT REMEQIES . Section 5.1 Default, The occurrence of any Qne or more of the following events shall ' constitute a material default and breach of this ECCR by the non-performing Party(the"Defaulting Party")! (a) The failure to make any payment required to be made hereunder within ten(10) business days of the-due date,or (b) The failure to observe or perform any of the covenants,conditions or obligations of this ECCR or to abide by the restrictions and requirements herein provided,other then es described in (a) above, within thirty (30) days after the issuance of a notice by another Party (the"Non-Defaulting Party")specifying the nature of the default claimed. 8 • Easarwrtte,Camnantolor*end Realriotioro Vd-Bozeman,MT L 0 3939® 11111111111111111 dill IIIIIII Dill���IIIII IIII���� 02 M12e0, 011 9:60P ' BMl14V Vena4-0R11et1n Co MT MJ$C 00;00 Section 5.2 Pjalt to Cure. Will reapaet to any defaUtt under Section 5.1 above, any Non- Defaulting Party shall hsve.the right, but not the obligation,to cure such default by the payment of money or the performance of some other action for the account of and at the expense of the Defaulting Party; provided, however, that in the event the default shall constitute an emergency condition, the Non- Defaulting Party,acting In good faith, shall have the right to cure such default upon such advance notice as Is reasonably possible under the circumstances or,'if necessary, without advance notice, so long as notice is given as soon Be possible thereafter.To effectuate any such cure,the Non-Defaulting Party shall have the right to enter upon the Parcel of the Defaulting Party(but not into any building)to perform any necessary work or furnish any necessary materials or services to cure the default of the Defaulting Party. Each Party shall be responsible for the default of its occupants, In the event any Non-Defaulting Party shall cure a default, the Defaulting Party shall reimburse the Non-Defaulting Party for all costs and expanses incurred In connection with such curative action,plus Interest at the prevailing legal rate,within ten (10) business days of receipt of demand, together with reasonable documentation supporting the expenditures made. Section 5.3 Liens. Costa and expenses accruing and/or assessed pursuant to Section 5.3 above and tha amounts described in Section 5.1 shell constitute a lien against the Defaulting Party's Parcel.The Ilan shell attach and take effect only upon recordation of a claim of lien in the applicable real estate records office of the county In which the said Parcel Is located,by the Party making the claim.The claim of Ilan shall Include the following; (i) The name of the lien claimant; (II) A statement concerning the basis for the claim of lien and Identifying the lien claimant as a curing Party; (ill) An Identification of the owner or reputed owner of the Parcel or Intere5(therein against which the Ilan Is claimed; (iv) A description of the Parcel against which the lien is claimed; (v) A description of the work performed which lies given rise to the claim of lien and a statement itemizing the amount thereof;and . (vi) A statement that the lien is claimed pursuant to tits provisions of this ECCR, reciting the date,book ad page of recordation hereof.The notice shall be duly acknowledged and contain a certificate that a copy thereof lies been served upon Ilia Party against whom the Ilen Is elebnad, by personal service or by.mailing pursuant to Soctlon 8.6 below.The lien so claimed shall attach from the data of recordation solely In the amount claimed thereby and may be enforced in any jvdiaial proceedings allowed by law, including without limitation, suit in the nature of a suit to foreclose a mortgage or mechanic's lien under the applicable provisions of the law of the State In which the Properties are located. Section 5.4 Other Remedies, Each non-Defaulting Party shall have the right to prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against any Defaulting Party hereto, or any other Person, violating or attempting to violate or defaulting upon any of the provision contained in this FQCR, and to recover damages for any such violation or default,Such proceeding shall include the right to restrain by Injunction any violation or threatened violation by another of any Of the terms,covenants,or conditions of this ECCR, or to obtain a decree to compel performance of any such terms,covenants,or conditions,It being agreed that the remedy at law for a breach of any such term, covenant, or condition (except those, if any, requiring the payment of a liquidated sum)is not adequate.All of the remedies permitted or available to e' Party under this=CCR or at low or In equity shall be cumulative and not alternative,and Invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitlac or evaliable right or remedy. Sect n .5 No VVaiver.No delay or omission of any Party In the exercise of any right accruing upon any default of any other Party shall impair any such right or be construed to be a waiver thereof,and every such right may be exercised at any time during the continuance of such default.No waiver by any Party of eny default under this ECCR shall be effective or binding on such Party unless made in writing by such Party and no such waiver shall be implied from any omission by a Party to take action in respect to such default. No express wrltteri waiver of any default shall affect any other default or cover any other Eo ...nn,Cav1020410ona and Raalacuana vo-eozaman,MT I 11111 jjujII1II�111 IIII`I IIII II11IIIIn11 Z 13999O`hll•y t4no..a.11rtin ew HT MINC as,aa period of time other than any default and/or period of time specified In such express waiver.One or more written waivers or any default under any provision of this ECCR shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default In the performance or the same provision or any other term or provision contained In this ECCR. Section 5. No TCrWJagq2aj9r Breach.No breach,whether or not materiel,of the provlslone of this ECCR shall entitle any Party to cancel,-rescind or otherwise terminate this ECCR,but such limitation shall not,affect, In any manner, any other rights or remedies which any Party may have hereunder by reason of any breach of the provisions of this ECCR. Section S,7 L�fPllatlon of Llabtl�.Notwithstanding the foregoing,any person acquiring fee or leasehold tide to any of the Properties,or any portion thereof,shall be bound by this ECCR only es to the Parcel or portion of the Parcel acquired or possessed by such person. In addition,such parson shall be bound by this ECCR only during the period such person is the fee IeaBehold owner or occupant of such Parcel or portion of the Parcel;and,upon conveyance or transfer of the fee or leasehold interest shall be released froht liability hereunder,except es to the obligations,liabilities or responsibilities that accrue prior to such conveyance or transfer.Although persons may be released under this Section,the easements, covenants and restrictions In this ECCR shall continue to be benefits to and servitudes upon said tracts running with the lend, ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS §gE ion 6,1 Damage and Destruction. In the event of the destruction and damage to any extent to the buildings and Improvements on the Properties, the affected Party shall either(1)diligently commence and pursue completion of the repair or restoration and or(2),within ninety(90)days after the destruction or damage clear away the ruins and leave the Parcel In a clean, orderly, sightly and safe condition. In the event any building,structure or other Improvement on an Oulparcel shall be damaged or destroyed by any fire or other casualty,the owner,lessee or user of the Outparcel shell within ninety (90)days of such damage or destruction(a)commence to repair and/or reconstruct such improvements to . the condition required by this Section; or (b) level such Improvement, remove the debris from the Outparcel and keep the Outparcel neat, orderly, planted In grass and trimmed until subsequently Improved,constructed upon and operated, Section 6.2 MaIntanance. Each Party hereto shall maintain its.Parcel and the buildings and improvements situated thereon in good order and condition and state of repair In accordance with the standards of good shopping center operation including(but not limited to)sweeping and removal of trash, litter and refuse, painting and striping of parking areas, repair and replacement of paving as necessary, maintenance of landscaped areas(including replacement and rtiplanting), removal of ice and snow from driveways and perking areas,and maintenance and repair or lighting standards and signs. Each of the- Parties covenants that it, In addition to other requirements of this Section,will maintain Its buildings at Its own expense In a clean, orderly and sanitary condition and free of Insects, rodents, vermin, and other peels;will not permit accumulation of garbage,trash rubbish and other refuse,and will remove same at its own expense, and will keep such refuse In proper containers or compactors in places designe(ed therefore until called for to be removed;and will keep the sidewalk and parking areas on its Parcel clear of accumulations of ice and snow.The Parties confirm their Intention that'the maintenance and repair of the Properties shall be of such a character that the Properties'appearance will be that of a unified shopping center'and,accordingly,the Parties agree to cooperate with each other in good faith with respect to said maintenance and repair and to the extent reasonably possible coordinate such repair and maintenance. Section 6.3 Estoppel Certificalt:a. Each Party shall upon not less than thirty (30)days from receipt of written notice from the other Party,which shall not occur more then twice per year,execute and dellver to such other Party a certificate in recordable form stating that(I)either this ECCR is unmodified and in full force and affect or Is modlfled(and stating the modification);and(II)whether or not to the best 8 EeBomems.Cmamnb*flansand Ft stnouonsV4-BozamrL 1111111WI III Hill 11111111Pa 1f0��9J900 . shallev Vanua-Od Latin Co MT M164 oleo of its knowledge the other Party Is in default in any respect under this ECCR and If in default, specifying • such default. Section 6.4 arm and Perpetuity- The easements, conditions, covenants, restrictions and obligations created and Imposed herein shall be effective upon the date hereof, shall run with the land. and shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties, their heirs, executors,.administrators, successors,successors-In-title, assigns and tenants, including any ground lessee under a ground lease and the customers,employees and Invitees of such Parties.Said easements, restrictions and obligations shell be urmffeoted by any change In the ownership of any property covered by this EGGR or by any change of use,demolition,reconstruction,expansion or other circumstances,except as specified herein. Except as specifically eel forth in this ECCR, the easements, covenants, conditions, restrictions and agreements'contsined herein binding and benefiting the Parties shall deemed to be perpetual. If,however,any of the conditions,covenants,restrictions or agreements created by this ECCR shall be unlawful,void or voidable for violation of the rule against perpetuities,then any such condition(s). covenant(s), restriction(s)or agreement(&)shall continue only until twenty-one(21)yeara after the death of the survivor of the now living descendents of tha immediate president of the United Stales,George W. Bush. Section 6.5 Notices,Any notice required or permitted to be given under this ECCR shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given upon deposit In the United Stales Mail as Certified Meil, Return Receipt Requested, postage'prepaid, and addressed to the Party balhg notified at the address given below(or such other address which any party may designate for itself from time to time hereafter by written notice to the other Parties): Philip Saccoccla,Jr. 991 Easl Beach Pass Christian,MS 39571 Copy to: Donefd Theriot Bordelon,Hatnlln and Theriot 100 South Peters Street • New Orleans,LA 70130 Section 6.7 Ground Lessee As&1I nment.The rights and obligations of any party hereunder may be assigned in whole or In part to one or more ground lessees which rights and bbligatiohe shall be expressly assumed by such ground lessee or lessees for the term of the ground lease or leases between such party and such ground lessee or lessees. Section 6.9 Insurance• IndemnificatjS20:Waiver Qf ubrooalion. Each Party will at all times maintain or cause to be maintained with respect to Its Parcel:(1)commercial property insurance against loss or damage by fire, lightning and other risks customarily covered by an all-risks policy of property insurance for the full replacement cost of the Improvements located thereon and(ii)commercial general liability Insurance (Including contractual liability coverage) against claims for bodily Injury, death or Property damage occurring on,in or about such Party's Parcel combined single limit coverage of not less than TWO MILLION DOLLARS(^s2,000,000.01))per occurrence. To the extent not covered by the Insurance policies described above, each Party (the "Indemnitor") will pay, and Indemnify and save harmless thY other Party (the "Indemnitee") from and against,all liabilities,losses,damages,Costs,expenses(Including atlomays'foes grid expenses),causes of action, suits, claims, demands or judgments of any nature arising from: (i)any injury to or death of a person or loss of or damage to property occurring on the Indemnilor's Parcel:(ii)any use or condition of the Indemnitor's Parcel; and(iii)any negligence or tortious acts of the Indemnilor or any of his tenants, licensees,invitees,customers,agents or employees. Each party (the "Releasor")hereby releases the other Party(the "Releases")from any and all liability or responsibility to the Releasor or anyone claiming through or under the Releasor by way of subrogalion or otherwise for any Incurred loss or damage to any person or properly caused by fire or other peril 4r other such loss,damages,or other insured event or negligence of the Releasee,or anyone for whom such Releasee may be responsible;provided,however,that this release shall be applicable and • 9 Faeamam7.cevena�diuena and Restrictions va-9otemen.M T 1111111011111011111111111111 oil III 1II1II�I IIII 2139990 ast It o f 0110 MP Gha11W Van -Gallatin Co HT nr11e aue.eo In force and effeot.oniy with respect to loss or damage occurring during such time as the Releasors policy or policies of Insurance shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement, to the effect that any such release shall not adversely affect or impair,sald policy or policies or prejudice the right of the Releasor to recover thereunder. Section 6.1a Harmony. Parties agree to cooperate in creating a reasonably harmonious exterior appearance for the Improvements to be conatruoted by them on the Properties. Section 6.12 Seyarabilily. In the event any provision or portion of this ECCR is held by any court of competent Jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, such.holding will not affect the remainder hereof, and the remaining ptovlsians shall continue in full force and effect to the same extent as would have been the case had such Invalid or unenforceable provision or portion never been a part hereof. agg((gp Q13 Breach.In the event of breach or threatened breach of this ECCR,only Seller or all Owners of more then 7,500 square feet of enclosed building area shall be entitled to institute proceedings for full and adequate relief from the consequences of said breach or threatened breach. In the event of a breach hereof, the non-prevailing Party shall pay the reasonable attorney's fees of the prevailing Party. Section 8,14 No Public bedicatipn.Nothing contained herein shall be.deemed or implied to be a gift,grant or dedication of the Properties or any portions thereof to the general public,or for any public use or purpose whatsoever. Except as may be specifically provided herein, no right, privileges or Immunities of any'Petty hereto shall insure to the benefit of any Ihini-party, nor shall any third-party be deemed or considered to be a beneficiary of any of the provisions herein contained. Section 6.15 Counter0arts.This ECCR may be executed in one or more counterparts,each of which shall be deemed an original and all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. $gg►ion 6.1 Z ftJW GL&1p of llit l?xJhus. Nothing contained herein shall be construed or Interpreted as ereatitig a partherehip,joint enterprise or joint venture between or among the Parties.It Is understood that the relationship between the Parties is an arms length one that shall at all times be and remain that of separate owners of real property. No Party shall have the right to act for or on behalf of another Party,as agent or otherwise,unless expressly authorized to do so by separate written instrument signed by the Party to be charged or bound. • Set ctlorL618 Open Specs Area Meinianance.Tha PFtrties shall have q' Joint obligation by separate agreement to maintain all open space areas on each of their respective Parcels, Section 6.19 Cash4n-Lleu of Water Rights. Cash-In-Ileu of water rights fee shall be assessed against each parcel at the time of filing Final Subdivision Plats or Final Site Plans.The Director of Public Service shall calculate the fee at Bald time of filing. Section qa Rights of the City of ti_ggman, Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herain,.the City of Bozeman shall be deemed to be a third-party beneficiary of this Declaration: Article II (Essements), Section 4.2 (Monument or Pylon Signage), Section 6.18 Open Space Area Maintenance and Section 019 Gesh•in-Lieu of water Right,$).Any revocation or amendment,supplement of modification to these provisions shall require the prior written consent of the City.The City Is hereby granted the Immediate access to the common areas of the planned unit development for the purpose of(i) preserving the public health,safely and welfare and(II)collection of solid waste.Further,the"Owner"and each parcel owner herein after acquiring title to any Parcel within the Planned Unit Development hereby agrees that,as more particularly provided In the Development Guidelines for the Saccoccla Planned Unit Development, all buildings within the Planned Unit Development (and any subsequent additions, alterations,exterior remodeling or reconstruction of buildings in the Planned Unit Development)shall be In conformance with.the Development Guidelines.Further,the Plot Plan and Design Guidelines shall not be modified in any respect without the approval of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed and delivered this ECCR as of the day and year first written above. 10 +I 213a9�0 68Y0M-1d,C64.nbnt&Condition.—d R-1.6c m V4-Bozeman,MT i Iflill��lll lull ll�lE Illl�l9 0111111111111111 Paget 1 i r0i's� Shelley Veno-64118tin co MT 5109 66.00 • LANDOWNER Philip Saccoc I . STATE OF :ss County of On this 3 day of 2Qwbefore me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the above named county and 6tate,personally appeared Philip SaCCCCC Jr.,known to ma to be the person who executed the within Instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes therein stated, IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my d and affixed y t i�(hend year first I.a1-•abov..Writtaq. (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of !K 1 Residing aL&Oyl, My Conmission Expires. (Use four digits for expiration year) My,Commission Ezplrsa:MAR 19,200 LANDOWNER Hancock Banl(-Custodlan For Philip Saucoccia,Jr,IRA Rollover STATE 0aj2�j�- / County of On thls,_�_day of 2Ua/before e,Uie under a No ery Public in and for the above named county and state,personally appeared,, �jf as Hancopk Bank . stodjan,known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of Phillip Sacooccia. Jr. IRA Rollover. Hancock _"- u;jtQoLm, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes therein stated. IN N/rfNE55 WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my h)1nd and affixed m No rl i e the day and year first F�l�•, 4.1:} '`s (Printed Name Here) i97 Notary Publ' r t e State of '`nt'•,�' , ;f �° Residing t My Commission Expires (Use four digits for expiration year) yycomntlesion Expires:MARIO,9W • 11 • APPENDIX D ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST a � • CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners within 200 feet of the N W '%/A , tJ W ►/q Se.crh0^ ► l i Z S , Q S C property located at C Se-V w-c— 'R, �r}�cr � 'T sCln ,�,e ,, 0-1-s d �- �' 1 • 1'�'�5 AN c�, is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Signature (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List—Prepared 11/20/03) P� Rp Ln 6 ,Z 0 r6X Ply-c's I 1 t 20b4 CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners within 200 feet of the property located at is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Signature • (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List—Prepared 11/20/03) Proposal Lowe's HIW PUD and Preliminary Site Plan Property Owners Adjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads", etc. Within 300 feet of the proposal site. Legal Description of Property Property Owner's Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 1 Stone Ridge Minor Subdivision #272 Bozeman Lodging Investors, LLC c/o 2020 Charlotte Street T2S RSE, Section 2 Lot 57 Bozeman, MT 59718 2 Stone Ridge Minor Subdivision #272 Cape-France, Inc 2020 Charlotte Street • T2S RSE, Section 2 Lot 55 Bozeman, MT 59718 3 Bridger Peaks Town Center Subdivision Ph 1 & Bridger Peaks, LLC 1660 Union St. FL 4, 2 c/o Stepstone Real Estate San Diego, CA 92101-2926 T2S RSE, Section 1 Lot 8, 10, 11 NW 1/4, Track 4A-1, COS 1215D 4 Bridger Peaks Village Subdivision J-368 Philip Saccoccia, Jr. 991 E Beach Blvd T2S RSE, Section 1 Pass Chris, MS 39571-4717 NW 1/4, Track 46-1 of COS 1215D 5 COS 1215, Track 2A PT Land 511 North Wallace T2S RSE, Section 1 Bozeman, MT 59715-3757 6 Lewis & Clark Commercial Subdivision J-376 State of Montana PO Box 201601 T1 S RSE, Section 36 Helena, MT 59620 7 Gardner-Simmental Plaza, Tract 8 D.R. Fisher, Company 22519 Marine View Dr. S. T1 S RSE, Section 35 Lot 4 Des Moines, WA 98198-6835 8 Gardner-Simmental Plaza, Tract 8 SKA, Inc. 5851 E. Baxter Ln T1 S RSE, Section 35 Lot 3 Bozeman, MT 59718-7930 9 Stone Ridge Minor Subdivision #272 Bozeman Area Chamber of 2000 Commerce Way T2S RSE, Section 2 .Lot 58 Commerce Bozeman, MT 59715 10 Stone Ridge Minor Subdivision #272 Mountain West Bank, NA 1225 Cedar Street T2S RSE, Section 2 Lot 56 Helena, MT 59601-0908 Page 1 of 2 Aosal Lowe's HIW PUD and Preliminary Site Piano • Property Owners Adjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads", etc. Within 300 feet of the proposal site. Legal Description of Property Property Owner's Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 11 Minor Subdivision 319 Home Depot USA, Inc 3800 West Chapman Ave T2S R5E, Section 2 Lot 1, 2, 3 Attn: Legal Dept Orange, CA 92868 • 12 Minor Subdivision 319 Stone Ridge Partners, LLC 8645 W. Franklin Road T2S R5E, Section 2 Lot 4 Boise, ID 83709-0632 13 Bridger Peaks Town Center Subdivision Ph 1 & Donald W. Steinke, Trustee 4444 Spring Meadow Road 2 Don Steinke Family Trust Cameron Park, CA 95682-9680 T2S R5E, Section 2 Lot 9 NW 1/4, Track 4A-1, COS 1215D 14 Bridger Peaks Town Center Subdivision Ph 1 & Montana Opportunities, LLC 113 South 19th St. 2 Bozeman, MT 59718-4017 T2S R5E, Section 2 Lot 7 NW 1/4, Track 4A-1, COS 1215D 15 Remainder Track D, COS 1240F Grace E. France 4350 Airport Road T2S R5E, Section 2 Belgrade, MT 59714 16 Remainder Track D, COS 1240F Joann L. Cape 515 North 21 st Ave • T2S R5E, Section 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Page 2 of 2 i I ' it APPENDIX E SCS SOILS MAP SOILS MAP OF THE BOZEMAN LOWE'S SITE is sfd f t E �90 E U 7� a Baxter Lane SAYPO SILT LOAM ENBAR LOAM BLACKDOG SILT LOAM Il � kl Project Boundary } C ' Q i « source: NRCS soils data Legend N Blackdog silt loam 0 125 250 500 1:3,600 w E Q Enbar loam Feet ®Saypo silt loam S Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana • Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area. Mapunit and soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 50B - BLACKDOG SILT LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 15 to 19 inches Mean annual 39 to 43 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Blackdog and similar soils Extent: about 90 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 5 Landform(s): stream terrace Wind erodibility group 6 Slope gradient: 0 to 4 percent Wind erodibility index 48 Parent material: calcareous loess Land capability class, non- 3e Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: well drained Seasonal high water table: greater than 60 inches Hydric soil: no Flooding hazard: none Hydrologic group. B Ponding none Potential frost action: moderate Ecological Silty, 15 to 19 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, south Available Representative soil Texture Permeability Water Capacity pH Kw Kf H1 — 0 to 10 in silt loam moderate 1.8 to 2.0 in 6.6 to 7.3 .32 .32 H2 — 10 to 19 in moderately slow 1.4 to 1.8 in 6.6 to 7.8 .32 .32 • H3 — 19 to 60 in moderate 6.6 to 8.2 in 7.9 to 8.4 .37 .37 Minor Components Distribution Generation Date: Page 1 of 1 • Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number— Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHT Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index O In Pct Pct Pct 506: Blackdog 0-10 Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 10-19 Silty clay loam CL A-6 0 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 30-40 10-20 19-60 Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 • • Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 Physical Soil Properties (J1a) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors-7 apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T bility group bility index density conductivity capacity matter Kw Kf T bility bility bility In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro In/In Pct Pct 5013: Blackdog 0-10 --- -- 20-27 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 • 10-19 — — 27-35 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.16-0.20 3.0-5.9 1.0-3.0 .32 .32 19-60 — -- 15-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 011 Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana • Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area. Mapunit and soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 509B - ENBAR LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 15 to 19 inches Mean annual 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Enbar and similar soils Extent: about 85 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 4 Landform(s): flood plain Wind erodibility group 6 Slope gradient: 0 to 4 percent Wind erodibility index 48 Parent material: loamy alluvium Land capability class, non- 3w Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: somewhat poorly drained Seasonal high water table: approximately 33 inches Hydric soil: no Flooding hazard: rare Hydrologic group: B Ponding none Potential frost action: high Ecological Subirrigated, 15 to 19 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, Available Representative soil Texture Permeability Water Capacity pH Kw Kf H1 -- 0 to 22 in loam moderate 3.5 to 4.4 in 6.6 to 7.8 .28 .28 H2 -- 22 to 49 in moderate 3.7 to 4.8 in 7.4 to 8.4 .37 .37 • H3 49 to 60 in moderately rapid 0.4 to 0.6 in 7.4 to 8.4 .05 .20 Minor Components Distribution Generation Dare: Page 1 of 1 • Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number— Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHT Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index O In Pct Pct Pct 50913: Enbar 0-22 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 80-100 75-100 60-85 50-75 20-30 5-10 22-49 Loam,Sandy loam CL-ML, A-4 0 0 80-100 75-100 60-85 50-75 20-30 NP-10 ML • 49-60 Very gravelly loamy sand, GM, A-1, 0 0-10 25-60 15-50 10-40 5-30 15-25 NP-5 Very gravelly sandy loam, GP-GM A-2 Extremely gravelly sandy loam • Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 Physical Soil Properties (A a) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors—T'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T bility group bility index density conductivity capacity matter Kw Kf T bility bility Ulllty In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro In/In Pct Pct 5096: Enbar 0-22 — -- 18-27 1.15-1.35 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 3.0-5.0 .28 .28 4 6 4110 22-49 — — 18-27 1.35-1.55 4.00-14.00 0.14-0.18 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 49-60 — — 5-18 1.50-1.70 14.00-42.00 0.04-0.05 0.0-2.9 0.0 .05 .20 • Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana • Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area.Mapunit and soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 506A - SAYPO SILT LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 12 to 18 inches Mean annual 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Saypo and similar soils Extent: about 85 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 2 Landform(s): stream terrace Wind erodibility group 4L Slope gradient: 0 to 2 percent Wind erodibility index 86 Parent material: loamy alluvium' Land capability class, non- 6w Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: somewhat poorly drained Seasonal high water table: approximately 33 inches Hydric soil: no Flooding hazard: none Hydrologic group: C Ponding none Potential frost action: high Ecological Saline lowland, 10 to 14 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, Available Representative soil Texture Permeability. Water Capacity pH Kw . Kf H1 — 0 to 10 in silt loam moderate 1.1 to 1.4 in 7.9 to 8.4 .28 .28 H2 — 10 to 21 in moderate 1.1 to 1.4 in 7.9 to 8.4 .37 .37 • H3 — 21 to 60 in moderately slow 4.3 to 5.5 in 7.9 to 8.4 .37 .37 Minor Components Distribution Generation Date: Page 1 of 1 Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number-- Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHT Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index O In Pct Pct Pct 506A: Saypo 0-10 Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 90-100 85-100 70-90 20-25 5-10 10-21 Clay loam,Silty clay loam, CL. A-4, 0 0 90-100 85-100 75-90 65-80 25-35 5-15 Silt loam CL-ML A-6 21-60 Gravelly clay loam,Silty CL, A-4, 0 0 65-95 60-95 55-90 45-80 25-35 5-15 clay loam,Silt loam CL-ML, A-6 GC, • Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 • i Physical Soil Properties (J1 a) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors—T'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T hility group bility index density conductivity capacity matter Kw Kf T bility bility bility In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro In/In Pct Pct 506A: Saypo 0-10 — — 20-27 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.11-0.14 0.0-2.9 3.0-5.0 .28 .28 2 4L 86 10-21 -- — 20-35 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.10-0.13 3.0-5.9 1.0-2.0 .37 .37 21-60 -- — 20-35 1.30-1.50 1.40-4.00 0.11-0.14 3.0-5.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 s Tabular Data Version: 1 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 APPENDIX F NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL PLAN • SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND Galatin Court REVEGETATION PLAN(PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) Weed (Revised May 2004) district Projected date for Preliminary Plat application Date Plan received Before construction/disturbance begins,please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board.This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District,and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act.Upon approval by the Board,this plan must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or appointed Representative in cooperation with the agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1.Name of Cooperator: Philip A. Saccoccia (Print Full Name and Name of Company) 991 St. Beach, Pass Christian, MS 39571 . (228)436-0463 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2.Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: Legal Description: NW 1/4, NW 1/4,Sec. 1 ,T. 2 N/S,R. 5 E/W • If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision: Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD, COS 1215C, Tracts 1A & 1B; COS 1215/ 3.Land Use(Please check the appropriate box(s) (a)Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture 0 Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain Property previously in small grain production and farmed for hay (b)Future Land Use Agriculture❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑✓ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other Please explain Commercial PUD Subdivision Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes❑ No❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ 7. Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ 8. Has the Cooperator attached written estimates of weed control and revegetation costs? Yes ❑ No 1 B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN • 1) Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown(due to snow cover)❑ If yes, list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s). Attach map showing location of noxious weeds on property. If unknown due to snow cover,Cooperator will submit a completed noxious weed inventory and explanation of control methods for approval by the Weed Control District by May 15th of the upcoming field season. Past inventories of the area suggest the presnece of Canada Thistle and Prickley Lettuce in limited quantities. (Gallatin County noxious weeds are listed in section III of Noxious Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/disturbance of the property. Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property outline the infestation(s)on a map of the property or on a subdivision plat map. If noxious weed infestations are found on-site, sutable control measures will be detailed in resubmittal. • IS PROPERTY FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION? YES ❑ NO ❑✓ IF PROPERTY IS FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION THE FOLLOWING MANDATORY CONDITION OF APPROVAL APPLIES:If property is fallow,in stubble,or in small grain production,once agricultural production ceases,that area of the property not under immediate development will be planted to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District. See Revegetation Section,C.I.,for complete details regarding reseeding and grass reestablishment requirements. Please complete the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Herbicide Control: *Noxious Weed Chemical Name Rate *Noxious Weed Chemical Name Rate *Noxious Weed Chemical Name Rate *Noxious Weed Chemical Name Rate *Noxious Weed Chemical Name Rate *Timing and method of treatment(s): Property shall be seeded with approved native grass mix and maintained by Lowe's and the Landowner through reciprocol agreements. 2 • Herbicide control work done by-Self ❑or Contracted❑Name of Contractor Estimated cost of herbicide control: Year One: Year Two: Year Three: Total: $0.00 Estimate provided by: (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: *Methods of weed control- *Timing of control method(s): Cultural/Mech control work done by-Self❑or Contracted❑✓ Name of Contractor Estimated cost of cultural/mechanical control: Year One: Year Two: Year Three: Total: $0.00 Written estimate provided by: (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (c) Biological Control: *Biological control agent(s) *Timing of the release(s)of the Bio-control agent(s): *Weed control method(s)used to control weed spread while insects establish: • Biological control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted❑Name of Contractor 3 Estimated cost of Biological control: Year One: Year Two: Year Three: Total: $0.00 Written estimate provided by: (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (d) Total Estimated Costs of Weed Control(Herbicide+Cultural/Mechanical+Biological)for three (3)Years: Year Herbicide Cultural/Mechanical Biological 1 • 2 3 Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 • Total: $0.00 • 4 • C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS 1. Is property fallow or in small grain production? Yes ❑ No 0 If property is fallow or in small grain production outline the area that is fallow or in production on a map of the property or on a subdivision plat map. a) If yes,area of disturbance(acres): IF PROPERTY IS FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION THE FOLLOWING MANDATORY CONDITION OF APPROVAL APPLIES: If property is fallow,in stubble or in small grain production,once agricultural production ceases,that area not under immediate development (within 12 months)will be planted to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District. Cooperator will revegetate and establish grasses on that portion of the property previously fallow,in stubble,or in small grain production. This includes that portion of the property dedicated to open space,parklands,or common areas. In conjunction with the grass seeding,during the first and second years of grass establishment,and in the third week of June and in the fourth week of July,the area seeded to grass will be mowed to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. 2. Will utility/service lines be installed? Yes ❑ No ❑ a) If yes,length of service lines(ft.or miles): b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq.ft.) c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil • 3. Will a pond be constructed? Yes ❑ No ❑ a) If yes,area of disturbance(sq. ft.): b) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 4. Will a road system be constructed? Yes ❑ No a) If yes,length of road(ft.or miles): b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq.ft): c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 5. Other disturbances Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes,explain 5 6. List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish • revegetation of the disturbed areas(fallow ground,fallow/stubble areas,service lines,fire pond,road system,others)listed above. MANDATORY RE,VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS:Areas disturbed during subdivision development (road construction,pond construction,service/utility/gas/electric/telephone line installation)will have a 6" (six inch)layer of topsoil redistributed onto disturbed areas.Disturbed areas will be seeded to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District.In conjunction with the grass seeding,during the first and second years of grass establishment,and in the third week of June and in the fourth week of July,the areas seeded to grass will be mowed to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. a) If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: Type Rate Type Rate Type Rate Type Rate • Type Rate b) If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used: Type Rate Type Rate Type Rate c) Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate seeding/sod date(s) Approximate fertilizer date(s) Note:If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15th for a spring seeding or after October 15`h for a fall dormant seeding., Revegetation work done by Self ❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor: 6 • d) Estimated cost of Revegetation: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): (2) Soil Replacement Cost: (includes cost of bringing onsite 6"lift/layer of topsoil and.cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) (3) Seed Cost: (4) Labor Cost: (5) Mowing Cost: (6) Other costs: Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 years: Year One: Year Two: Year Three: Total: $0.00 Date revegetation work to be completed by: • Written estimate provided by: (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 7. Total estimated cost of implementing Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for a period of three(3)years(includes Herbicide+Cultural/Mechanical+Biological+Revegetation costs): Year Herbicide Cultural/Mechanical Biological Revegetation 1 2 3 Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Grand Total: $0.00 • 7 • D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED AND/OR CONDITIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS: Upon Approved or Approved With Recommendations/Conditions the Cooperator agrees to comply with the above submitted Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan. (Signature of Weed Board Chairman/Representative) (Signature of Cooperator) (Type/print name of Chairman/Representative) (Type/print name of Cooperator) (Date) (Date) (Signature of Landowner) (Type/print name of Landowner) (Date) With submittal of the Memoranda of Understanding for final plat approval the Cooperator will provide: 1. Documentation that the above Weed Management&Revegetation Plan has been implemented. 2. Copy of subdivision covenants that apply to noxious weed management. 8 MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING FOR SUBDIVISION PLANNING (N) (FINAL PLAT APPROVAL) Projected date for Final Plat application Date MOU received This Memoranda of Understanding exists between the Gallatin County Weed Control District, hereafter referred to as"D_strict"and (Please Print Full Name) of (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) hereinafter referred to as"Cooperator",for the purpose of addressing the issues of noxious weeds and the revegetation of disturbed areas on land(s)within (Name of Subdivision) Legal Description NW , NW , Sec. 1 ,T. 2 N/S,R. 5 E/W • Under this Memoranda,the Cooperator has been informed of,and has agreed to comply with, the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements of the Gallatin County Weed Control District,the Montana County Weed Control Act, and the Gallatin County Weed Control District's Noxious Weed Management Plan as it relates to the above named property. While as a landowner, or lessee,the Cooperator w.11 comply with the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Requirements on a yearly basis as needed. Weed Board Chairman or Representative Cooperator Date Date F6*0FFICE.US00,NLY Cooperators Signature and Date. Yes ❑ No❑ Covenants attached. Yes ❑ No❑ Documentation of completion of WMP attached.Yes ❑ No❑ • APPENDIX G WETLAND INVESTIGATION ® = 0RM M N SO 00 MMERLE,INC. An Employee-Owned Company WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT FOR BOZEMAN LOWE'S IDP,.,..AIFT May 2005 • Prepared For Lowe's HIW,Inc. 1530 Faraday Avenue, Suite 140 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Prepared By Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group 901 Technology Boulevard Bozeman, Montana 59718 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTVE SUMMARY.................................................................................ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............:.........................................................................1 2.0 OBJECTIVES.............................................................................................1 3.0 METHODS.................................................................................................1 3.1 Off-Site Review ...........................................................................................1 3.2 On-Site Review ...........................................................................................2 4.0 RESULTS...................................................................................................2 4.1 Off-Site Review ...........................................................................................2 4.2 On-Site Review ...........................................................................................3 5.0 REFERENCES...........................................................................................5 • FIGURES Figure 1 Bozeman Lowe's Vicinity and Topographic Map Figure 2 Bozeman Lowe's Soils Map Figure 3 Bozeman Lowe's Aerial Photograph Figure 4 Bozeman Lowe's NWI Map Figure 5 Bozeman Lowe's Wetland delineation Map APPENDICES Appendix A COE Data Sheets Appendix B Photographs • Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report ES-1 Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 • EXECUTVE SUMMARY At the request of Lowe's HIW, LLC, the proposed site of Bozeman Lowe's was examined for the presence and extent of wetlands and waterways by Morrison- Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group in July of 2004 and April of 2005. The Bozeman Lowe's site is located in the northwest quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 4 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The property is relatively flat agricultural land with a topographic change of approximately 15 feet. The site slopes gradually to the northeast with dominant vegetation consisting of smooth brome (Bromus inermis, no status) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW). One perennial stream was depicted,on the topographic map immediately to the east of the property. This area was most likely to harbor wetlands. Field investigation verified the location of wetlands in and adjacent to this drainage. Four wetlands were identified within the Bozeman Lowe's property. Utilizing the Hydrogeomorphic Classification System, one depressional, one riverine, and two slope wetlands were identified and delineated on the property. All four of the wetlands were observed to be jurisdictional in that they ultimately connect with the East Gallatin River. Final jurisdictional status for all wetlands located within • the project area will be provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. • Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report Page 1 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 1.0 INTRODUCTION At the request of Lowe's HIW, LLC, the proposed site of Bozeman Lowe's was examined for the presence and extent of wetlands and waterways by Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group (MMI) on July 26, 2004 and April 25 and 26, 2005. Bozeman Lowe's is located in the northwest quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 4 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Historically the property was hayed and grazed. Existing conditions within the site include relatively flat agricultural land, with a topographic change of approximately 15 feet gradually sloping to the northeast, and one perennial stream with fringe wetlands. The dominant vegetation consists of smooth brome (Bromus inermis, no status) and reed canary grass (Phafaris arundinacea, FACW). No existing structures were observed on the site. The proposed use for the property is commercial development. 2.0 OBJECTIVES The purpose of the study was to locate areas that meet the criteria for wetlands and non-wetland waterways and delineate their boundaries. A second objective was to • provide observations as to the likely jurisdictional status of the delineated wetlands and waterways based on their hydrologic connection to a waters of the U.S. 3.0 METHODS The wetland delineation completed by MMI was based on the methodology developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and other federal agencies for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The investigation consisted of an off-site review of existing site-specific information and completion of an on-site inspection using the Routine Level 2 Determination Method outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. 3.1 Off-Site Review A preliminary off-site review of a variety of source documents was completed to identify potential wetland areas and waterways. The source documents used for this review included: the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1987 Bozeman, Montana 7.5' Topographic Map (Figure 1); the U.S. Department of Agriculture 2002 Soil Survey of Gallatin County, Montana (Figure 2).; a privately flown orthographic aerial photograph of the subject property (Figure 3); and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (Figure 4). • Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report Page 2 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 3.2 On-Site Review Wetlands were identified and delineated using the standard methodology described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual to assist in meeting the requirements of Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act. Wetlands were identified as areas that met the standard criteria for hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Wetland/upland boundaries were marked with pin flags and subsequently surveyed. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland/upland boundaries. Data were recorded on COE data forms for sample points on both the wetland and upland sides of the wetland boundary along a linear transect. Completed forms are included in Appendix A. Photographs were taken of individual data points, and these photographs, along with their descriptions, are provided in Appendix B. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage within a 20-foot radius of sample points for the tree and shrub layers and a 10-foot radius for herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Indicator status of plant species was taken from the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9- Northwest and the 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Soils were characterized to a depth of approximately 16 inches utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydrology was determined based on visual observation of factors such as inundation, soil saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, wetland drainage patterns, and FAC-Neutral test among others. 4.0 RESULTS The delineation effort consisted of a preliminary off-site investigation of available information and an on-site investigation that included a pedestrian survey of the project area. The investigation resulted in the delineation of one depressional, one riverine, and two slope wetlands. The total acreage for the four delineated wetlands on the property is approximately 0.92 acre. 4.1 Off-Site Review A review of the 1987 USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area shows relatively flat terrain with a change of approximately 15 feet across the property. The topographic map also • depicts Spring Creek in the southeast corner of the property. Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report Page 3 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 According to the Soil Survey of Gallatin County, Montana, three soil map units, Saypo silt loam 0 to 2 percent slopes (506A), Fairway Threeriv-Rivra Complex 0 to 2 percent slopes (508B), and Enbar loam 0 to 4 percent slopes (509B), occur within the project area. Five percent of the Saypo silt loam soil map unit, 30 percent of the Fairway Threeriv-Rivra Complex soil map unit, and 10 percent of the Enbar loam soil map unit are considered hydric soil units. A review of the aerial photograph identified the site as predominantly agricultural field. An abandoned railroad grade is located in the northeast property corner and Spring Creek occurs along the eastern edge of the property. The areas with lighter vegetation in the southeast portion of the property as well as the areas adjacent to the railroad grade in the northern portion of the property are mostly likely to harbor wetlands. A review of the NWI map shows three wetland types on the subject property palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded (PEMC), palustrine, scrub-shrub, temporarily flooded (PSSA), and palustrine, scrub-shrub, temporarily flooded, excavated (PSSAx). These wetlands are associated with Spring Creek located along the eastern boundary of the property. 4.2 On-Site Review • A map of the delineated wetland boundaries located within the project area has been provided as Figure 5. Corresponding data forms are provided in Appendix A and corresponding photographs are provided in Appendix B. The following description of the wetlands and their surrounding.uplands reflects conditions observed at the time of the delineation. Wetlands W-2-04 and W-3-04 and wetland W-4-04 were delineated in 2004. Additional wetland and upland data points for these wetlands were documented in 2005. Wetland W-1-05 was delineated in a follow up wetland delineation effort in 2005. Wetland W-1-05 is a depressional wetland. This wetland occurs along the northern edge of the property. The hydrology indicators for W-1-05 are inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, wetland drainage pattern, and a positive FAC-Neutral test. The hydric soil indicators for W-1-05 are low chroma color (10YR 2/1 and 10YR 4/1) with mottles (10YR 3/3). Dominant wetland vegetation include reed canary grass, tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia cespitosa, FACW), and poison-hemlock (Conium macu/atum, FAC+). The wetland boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation from reed canary grass in the wetland to awnless brome, Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense, FACU), and woods rose (Rosa woodsii, FACU) in the upland. Wetland W-1-05 was observed to be jurisdictional due to the hydrologic connection to W-3-04 which connects off property to the East Gallatin River, a waters of the U.S.. This observation is based on recent orthographic photographs. Wetland W-2-04 is a slope wetland with hummock and hollow microtopography. The • hydrology indicator is inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, and drainage patterns in the wetland. The hydric soil indicator is low chroma color 10YR 2/1. The dominant wetland vegetation includes beaked sedge, large-leaf avens (Geum Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report Page 4 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 macrophyllum, FACW-), hairy willow herb (Epilobium ciliatum, FACW-), broad-leaf cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL), willow spp. (Salix spp., NI, OBL-FAC). The wetland/upland boundary primarily follows a change in topography and a change in vegetation from broad-leaf cattail, beaked sedge, and large-leaf avens in the wetland to woods rose, snowberry (Symphoricarpos a/bus, FACU), butterweed groundsel (Senecio serra, FACU), houndstongue (Epilobium angustifolium, FACU+), and common dandelion (Taraxacum ofiicinale, FACU) in the upland. Wetland W-2-04 was observed to be jurisdictional due to the presence of a channel in the eastern portion of the property with a surface hydrologic connection to the East Gallatin River. Wetland W-3-04 is a slope wetland with hummock and hollow microtopography. The hydrology indicator is inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, drainage patterns in the wetland, and a positive FAC-Neutral test. The hydric soil indicators are low chroma color (10YR 2/1) with mottles (10YR 6/1). The dominant wetland vegetation includes large-leaf avens, broad-leaf cattail, reed canary grass, smooth scouring rush (Equisetum /aevigatum, FACW), and red-osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera, FACW). The wetland/upland boundary primarily follows a change in topography and a change in vegetation from broad-leaf cattail, reed canary grass, and large-leaf avens in the wetland to snowberry, common dandelion, and awnless brome in the upland. Wetland W-3-04 was observed to be jurisdictional due to the presence of a channel in the eastern portion of the property with a surface hydrologic connection to the East Gallatin • River. Wetland W-4-04 is a riverine wetland with hummock and hollow microtopography in the fringe areas. The hydrology indicator is inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, wetland drainage pattern, and a positive FAC-Neutral test. The hydric soil indicator is low chroma color (10YR 3/1 and 10YR 2/1). The dominant wetland vegetation includes tufted hairgrass, beaked sedge (Carex rostrata, OBL), and Baltic rush (Juncus balticus, FACW+). The wetland/upland boundary primarily follows a change in topography and a change in vegetation from tufted hairgrass, beaked sedge, and Baltic rush in the wetland to Timothy (Phleum pratense, FAC-), alsike clover (Trifolium hybridum, FAC), slender wheatgrass (Agropyron trachycaulum, FAC), and common dandelion in the upland. Wetland W-4-04 was observed to be jurisdictional due to the presence of a channel in the eastern portion of the property with a surface hydrologic connection to the East Gallatin River. A portion on the eastern side of W-1-05 and a portion on the western side of W-2-04 and W-3-04 have been filled as a result of agricultural land leveling activities. The COE has been contacted regarding this fill, and the landowner has been notified that the placement of fill in these wetlands would require a Section 404 Permit. The landowner has agreed to remove the fill from these areas and following fill removal, MMI will provide COE with a modified wetland delineation map that includes a delineation of the filled wetland areas. M • Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report Page 5 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 5.0 REFERENCES Aerial Photo. City of Bozeman. 2000. Orthographic Photo. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. Hansen, P.L., R.D. Pfister, K. Boggs, B.J. Cook, J. Joy, and D.K. Hinkley. 1995. Classification and Management of Montana's Riparian and Wetland Sites. Publication 54. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station,.School of Forestry. University of Montana. Missoula, MT. Munsell Color. 2000. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgan Instruments. New Windsor, NY. Reed, Porter B., Jr., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Supplement to Biological Report 88 (26.9) May 1988. Resource Management Group, Inc. 1993. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands Region 9-Northwest. Grand Haven, MI. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service. Montana Agriculture Experiment Station. 2002. Soil Survey of Gallatin County Area, Montana. U.S. Geological Survey. 1987. Bozeman, Montana 7.5' Topographic Map. Wetland Training Institute. 2001. Field Guide for Wetland Delineation. Wetland Training Institute. Glenwood, New Mexico. BOZEMAN LOWE'S BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA T2S, R5E, N 1/4 OF SECTION 1 %' Yr t. Y9_ ro—_, \ 35 I 80Z EX4. \\ e 4706 pp��- .+' t O17 - ;l \> • _ 86 T -\, or Cuel O / PROPER BOUND WT`53 ��• / .' _ • 1 /! I I ITra�ler I � s•ss = ,� • .11 � 1 , I d76BAT* ; • =J � I 1 I Park , IX ; al ground 8 -24 1 w• __' � � � ■ � _�I II .�s .I ... a �--- I � t• I �• 1 '' i` � .3 jam, ;�� I�� � .�C.� .f,Z • G4r S. i .>y 'Y 35S >ti 1 . . • :�I I Par c I x >. _ 15�......� . _ •c FIGURE 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 2000 1000 2000MORRISON BOZEMAN LOWE'S MAIERLtly. VICINITY AND ( IN FEET ) ` P' ' `" ""'MITdwlA D40>nlm.W.3WI.PT (4WSP-= r=(40+n_,IA TOPOGRAPHIC MAP I inch = 2000ft. CLIENT:LOWE'S HIW INC. FIELD WORK DATE:05/02/05 PLOTTED DATE: May/04/2005 - 01:29:55 pm DRAWN BY: SER SCALE:1•=2000' DRAWING NAME: H:\3373\003\ACAD\ENVIRONMENTAL\WET-FlGURES.°wg CHECKED BY:PWM PROJ #:3373.004 SHEET OF PLOTTED CHECKED , l L� l r A. 'y BAXTER LANE — r � 506 r` 3 8 1�. 509 Bw � , =*4 , 9L ' Iwo 508 B a —p ` t 508 B � _ �•. ° PROPERTY BOUNDARY H a _ CITY OF BOZEMAN 2000 ORTHOGRAPHIC AERIAL LEGEND: AND SSURGO SOILS DATA OVERLAID 506 A-SAYPO SILT LOAM, 0-2%SLOPES 508 B -FAIRWAY-THREERIV-RIVRA COMPLEX, 0-2%SLOPES 509 B -ENBAR LOAM, 04%SLOPES FIGURE 2 600 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 600 4MORRISON MAIERLE,Irrc. BOZEMAN LOWE'S "r�� SOILS MAP 4, IN FEET ) w ft Ills MI T l'd. V Bw a, W.sm.Fm (W WY-am F.(m)em-Um 1 inch = 600 ft. CLIENT:LOWE'S HIW INC. FIELD WORK- DATE:05/02/05 PLOTTED DATE: May/04/2005 — 01:30:55 pm DRAWN BY: SER SCALE:1"=600' DRAWING NAME: H:\3373\003\ACAD\ENVIRONMENTAL\WEf—FICURES.Ewg ,CHECKED BY:PWM PROJ #:3373.004 SHEET OF PLOTTED BY:...thuhlller :A, 'ip BAXTER LANE 10 �o PROPERTY BOUNDARY { CITY OF BOZEMAN 2000 ORTHOGRAPHIC AERIAL FIGURE 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 600 Q 300 600 9MORRISON BOZEMAN LOWE'S MAIERLE,Ixc. AERIAL MAP • ( IN FEET ) d Ilq ml 0(�e l'JAI•Nee 'd7�11 fc 8-1 1 inch = 600 ft. C6 LIENT:LowE•S NIW iNc. FIELD WORK• DATE:05/02/05 PLOTTED DATE May/04/2005 — 01:31:36 pm DRAWN BY: SER SCALE:1'=600' DRAWING NAME: n:\3373\003V�'AD\DMR0NMertw\WET-rtwa6a.g CHECKED BYJP PROD 3373.004 SHEET OF alarm gr Selma re r I i`t17 ot� R - .■.w� t , . s n-- Fay. ..N �' '.�+; �►' G yy �. ]§AXTtR LANE — - - — f ■ *Wx. PSS AX�� ' dlE��ri F PSSA PEMC t 41 zl- r - — PRORTY BOUNDARY L ' PE b JF � 3 CITY OF BOZEMAN 2000 ORTHOGRAPHIC AERIAL AND NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA OVERLAID LEGEND: PEMC -PALUSTRINE, EMERGENT, SEASONALLY FLOODED PSSA-PAULUSTRINE, SCRUB-SHRUB,TEMPORARILY FLOODED PSSAx -PA4JLUSTRINE, SCRUB-SHRUB, TEMPORARILY FLOODED, EXCAVATED FIGURE 4 GRAPHIC SCALE MORRISON � BOZEMAN LOWE'S60o 600 MAIERLE,INC. 9N` NWI MAP ( IN FEET ) `"■�""°".� w sv Hla Wl 7m'=b i W4 8—N.W"l.teos(4W WS Ml ree(we)MMIM f inch = 600 ft. CLIENT:LOWE'S HIW INC. FIELD WORK. DATE:05/02/05 PLOTTED DATE: May/04/2005 — 01:32:20 pm DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: SER SCALE:1..=600 H:\3373\003\ACAD\ENVIRONMENTAL\WET7FlOURES.Owg CHECKED BY:PWM PROJ #:3373.004 SHEET OF PLOTTED BY:erothschlller a_^�' i- _ '/ T: w: .�. -. - I may_. ., _� �'^•fi'� ..� 1 f. i y i TI ` : -ram 'r `C a• ;i d ~�, .: .k 14 A. .`, � 'r till i{ � ! 4? r�S{Y�'e - r. !l' li'• �3 y �i lob 40 IL eft i , � � �jam„,� ,� '�y ��•' i �; j�� i t (y a +� er .+ dw tl. j , ILL- y +eerr '4 to , •R ' • • �•' IERLE,!NC. WETLAND Hill DELINEATION MAP e .• .• PLO111De• e0 e ,.. , e• • : • APPENDIX A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Data Sheets Job Number: 3373.003 • Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-1-05-WI Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 25,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: State: MT --.._.._.... - - ._._....- - ......_....-- .-........ --.----- [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-1-05-W [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species Common Name %Cover _Indicator Herbaceous Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Conium maculatum Poison-Hemlock FAC+ Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary 95 FACW Shrub Rosa woodsii_ Rose,.Woods FACU %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [X]Inundated [ j Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Waten:in.): 2 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks • Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, Lin.) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure etc. 0-6 A 10YR 2/1 Sandy Clay Medium Subangular Blocky 6-16 B 10YR 4/1 10YR 3/3 few distinct Sandy Clay Medium Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ )Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [X]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509 B Enbar Loam Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Depressional Job Number: 3373.003 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination wetland Data Point: W-1-05-Upl Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 25,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: 5-1-05-Upl [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species Common Name %Cover Indicator Herbaceous Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue FACU Verbascum thapsus Mullein,Common NS Cirsium arvense Thistle,Creeping FACU+ Bromus inermis Brome,Awnless NS Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Shrub _ Rosa woodsii Rose_Woods _ FACU _ Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ J Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ i Local soil survey data [ J Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (ink Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc. 0-12 A 10YR 2/1 Silty Clay Loam Fine Granular 12-16 B 10YR 3/2 10YR 6/3 common prominent Silty Clay Loam Medium Granular Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ j Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moisi Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [X]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509 B Enoar Loam Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ J This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • i • Job Number: 3373.003 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination wetland Data Point: W-2-04-WI Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 26,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: _SR/EN _ _State: MT__ [X]Do normal circum.stances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-2-05-WI [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant _S,pedes _ Common Name %_Cover Indicator _ Herbaceous Tanacetum vulgare Tansy,Common NI Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue FACU Conium maculatum Poison-Hemlock FAC+ Epilobium angustifolium Fireweed FACU+ Geum macrophyllum Avens,Large-Leaf FACW- Epilobium ciliatum Willow-Herb,Hairy FACW- Typha latifolia Cattail,Broad-Leaf OBL Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Shrub Salix spp. Willow spp. NI,OBL-FAC Rosa woodsii Rose,_Wo_ods FACU %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [X]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) • Depth of Surface Water(in.): 1 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle 12nd Mottle Texture, in.) Color Color Abundance _Contrast Structure etc. 0-16 A 10YR 211 Sandy Clay Loam too wet to display structure Hydric Soils Indicators [ j Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ J Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions. [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ( ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 506 A Saypo Silt Loam Taxonomy: Aquic Calciustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Slope.Connects with Spring Creek. • Job Number: 3373.003 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-2-04-Upl Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 26,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-2.05-Upl [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species Common Name %Cover Indicator Herbaceous Taraxacum officinale Dandelion,Common FACU Tanacetum vulgare Tansy,Common NI Senecio serra Groundsel,Buttenneed FACU Epilobium angustifolium Fireweed FACU+ Cynoglossum otircinale Houndstongue FACU Shrub Rosa woodsii Rose Woods._— FACU Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ J Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ )Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 • Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, fin.) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc. 0-16 A 10YR 3/1 Sandy Clay Loam Fine Granular Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ J Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 506 A Saypo Silt Loam Taxonomy: Aquic Calciustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • Job Number: 3371003 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-3-04-WI Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 26,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT --- .._......._.........._-..............._.-_......_._..._..__...... —-- [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-3-05-WI [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species — Common Name %Cover Indicator Herbaceous Conium maculatum Poison-Hemlock FAC+ Equisetum laevigatum Scouring-Rush,Smooth FACW Geum macrophyllum Avens,Large-Leaf FACW- Typha latifolia Cattail,Broad-Leaf OBL Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Shrub Cornus stolonifera _ Dogwood,Red=Osier FACW %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [X]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ )Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 1 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 • Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, fin,) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure etc. 0-16 A 10YR 211 10YR 6/1 few prominent Sandy Clay Loam too wet to display structure Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [XJ Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [XI Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name:506 A Saypo Silt Loam Taxonomy: Aquic Calciustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Slope.Connects with Spring Creek • Job Number: 3373.003 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-3-04-Upl Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 26,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT __...__._._......_............_..- -....._..._..__._..._......_............---......--- --............-..............._---- [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-3-05-Upl [ ]Is the area a potential probrem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species ^� Common Name %Cover Indicator Herbaceous Tanacetum vulgare Tansy,Common NI Trifolium hybridum Clover,Alsike FAC Taraxacum officinale Dandelion,Common FACU Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Bromus inermis Brome,Awnless NS Shrub Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry FACU Crataegus douglasii Hawthorn,Douglas' FAC Corpus stolonifera Dogwood Red-Osier FACW %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 • Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc. 0-16 A 10YR 3/1 Sandy Clay Loam Fine Granular Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ j High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 506 A Saypo Silt Loam Taxonomy: Aquic Calciustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • Job Number: 3373.003 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination wetland Data Point: W-4-04-WI Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 25,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT --- -._.._....__._.....__....._._....._.... --._...---- _ ...._._... -- -.._.....-.............. - [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-4-05-WI [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species - Common Name -__%Cover Indicator Herbaceous Deschampsia cesoitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Juncus balticus Rush, attic FACW+ %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [X]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Watermarks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 1 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils • Depth Hor. Matrix .Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure etc. 0-8 A 10YR 3/1 Clay Loam too wet to display structure 8-16 B 10YR 2/1 Clay Loam too wet to display structure Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509 B Enbar Loam Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class:Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Riverine • i • Job Number: 3373.003 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-4-04-Upl Project/Site: Bozeman Lowe's Date: April 25,2005 Applicant/Owner: Lowe's HIW Inc. County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-4-05-Upl [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant _Species Common Name %°Cover_Indicator Herbaceous Trifolium hybridum Clover,Alsike FAC Phleum pratense Timothy FAC- Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Agropyron trachycaulum Wheatgrass,Slender FAC Taraxacum officinale Dandelion, ommon _ _. _ FACU °7o Species-that aFe OBI,FACW-or FAC(except-FAC::<59/-FAC or wdite"r- Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ )Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks • Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, lin. Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure etc. 0-16 A 10YR 01 Clay Loam Fine Granular Hydric Soils Indicators [ )Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509 B Enbar Loam Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ I This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • • APPENDIX B Photographs i• • • •1 . '••9 . • •• . • .• LTA reTa I a IVA I to] • • ELVA i 0 Y �►llj4 ♦. Si ° I �% Y � o Phcto 4. Viewof 14 2, upland data point. Bozeman Lowe's • DeliMorrison-Maierle Inc neation Environmentalry •- • • Ma 11 P � f-ate ry of 1 • Bozeman Lowe's Wetland Delineation Report Photographs Page 4 • •n-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group May 2005 • a Photo 7. View south o S-4-04 1, wetland data point. _/ �.�/ �.-.•-..yam..... /'�,..�-�.�_�_-_r i K\/y� i . V r Photo iView north • 2upland data p• c • APPENDIX H GRADING AND DRAINAGE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION MMI#: 3373.003 • DATE: 5/19/2005 ENGINEER: Paul Parson Drainage Basin MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION=1) i=A*(Tc/60)_a (CITY OF BOZEMAN) BASIN AREA PRE= 39.99 AC STORM EVENT I STORM i COEFF INTENSITY A B IN/HR PRE-DEV Tc= 48.1 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.13 5 0.52 0.64 0.18 PRE-DEV C= 0.30 10 0.64 0.65 0.22 25 0.78 0.64 0.27 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 0.31 B= 0.65 100 1.01 0.67 0.34 STORM INTENSITY= 0.74 IN/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 8.86 CFS POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 39.99 AC POST-DEV Tc= 13.7 MIN • POST-DEV C= 0.65 STORM INTENSITY= 1.68 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 43.55 CFS M:\3373\003\Docs\storm\Basin-10yr ] MODIFIED RATIONAL DIETHOD Drainage Basin • O0 O POST-IT BASIN AREA PRE- 39.99 AC POST-DEV Tc 13.7 MIN POST-DEV C- 0.65 STORM INTENSITY- 1.68 MMR POST-DEV QP- 4355 CFS DURATION- I - _ 21-11,11, ON', MAX VOLUM6 hLlli VpLUME�(CFI)6452�93 9._:,-,a POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS: Tri4nRlc Rd- CUnb I Rd-, DURATION INTENSITY On POND VOLUME POND VOLUME RETENTION VOL (MIN) (INMR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (CF) 12.97 1.73 45.03 27955.78 22306.47 16732.81 13.97 1.65 4:191 28612.70 22768.16 14.97 1.58 41.02 29227.61 _""8 09 15.97 1.51 39.33 29805.D4 23164.95 16.97 1.45 37.81 30348.81 23908.68 17.97 1.40 36.43 30862:12 24220.61 18.97 1.35 35.11 31347.73 2450359 19.97 1.31 J4.01 31808.00 24760:07 2097. 1.27 32.95 32245.00 24992.20 21.97 1.23 31.97 3266054 25201.86 22.97 1.19 31.05 33056.19. 25390.68 23.97 1.16 30.21 33433.38 25560.15 24.97 1.13 29.41 33793.35 25711.55 25.97 1.10 28.67 34137.23 25846.07 26.97 1.08 27.98 34466.04 25964:75 27.97 L05 27.32 34780.67 26068.54 28.97 1.03 26.71 35081.97 26158.30 29.97 1.00 26.12 35370.67-{ 26234.82 30.97 0.98 23.37 35647.47 J 26298.82 31.97 0.96 25.05 35912.99:. 26350.94 72.97 0.94 24.55 36167.82 26391.79 33.97 0.93 24.08 36412.48 2.21.92 34.97 0.91 23.63 36647.45:= 26441.84 35.97 0.89 23.20 36873.20 26452.03 36.97 0.88 22.79 - 37090.14 26452.93 37.97 0.86 22.40 37298.67,i 26444.97 38.97 0.85 22.02 37499.14 26428.43 • 40.91 0.83 21.66 3787714 26401.78 40.97 0.82 21.72 '. 378772d - 2637L70 41.97 0.81 20.99 38055.49 26311.30 42.97 0.80 20.67 3:226.91 26284.09 43.97 0.78 20.36 38391.77 26229.92 44.97 0.77 20.07 38550.30 2616906 45.97 0.76 19.78 38702.74 26101:74 46.97 0.75 19.51 38949.30_ 26028.20 47.97 0.74 19.24 38990.19.. 25948.65 48.97 0.73 18.98 39125.61;b 2586329 49.97 0.72 18.74 3921174 2577232 50.97 0.71 I8.50 39380:74 25675:92 51.97 0.70 18.26 - 39500.79 25574.25 52.97 0.69 18.04 39616.05 25467.49 53.97 0.69 17.82 .39726.65 r.' 25355:80 54.97 0.68 17.61 39832-74 252391 55.97 0.67 17.41 39934.47.''i_ 25119.17 56.97 0.66 17.21 - 40031:94"'- 24992.52 57.97 0.65 17.01 40125.29':is 24862.48 58.97 0.65 16.82 �40214.64 24726.18 59.97 0.64 16.64 40100:09 24589.74 60.97 0.63 16.46 40381:75 24447.26 61.97 0.63 16.29 - �40459:73: 24300.86 62.97 0.62 16.12 40534:12.': 2415063 63.97 0.61 15.96 40605:01 23996:638 64.97 0.61 15.80 40672.49 23839.10 65.97 0.60 15.64 -. :40736.66 23 66.97 0.60 15.49 -40797.59,_ 23513:41 67'97 0.59 15.34 40855.36 >i 2334547 68.97 0.58 15.20 40910.06 23174:24 69.97 0.58 15.05 40961:74 22999.80 70.97 0.57 14.92 .41010.49-. 22822.23 71.97 0.57 14.78 41036.36 i 22641.59 72.97 0.56 14.6541099.44 22457.96 73.97 0.56 14.52 -- 41139.77':= 22271.40 74.97 0.55 14.39 41177:42. 22081.97 75.97 0.55 14.27 4:212.46 21889.75 76.97 0.54 14.15 4244:92'- 2:69478 77.97 0.54 14.03 41274.88 2 497:12 78.97 0.54 13.92 .41302.39 2:296.84 79.97 0.53 13.80 41327.48' 21093.99 80.97 0.53 13.69 4135022 20888.61 81.97 0.52 13.58 - 41370.65 20680.76 92.97 0.52 13.1 41388.82 20470.49 93.97 0.51 17.77 41404.78'� 20257.84 84.97 0.51 13.27 4:418.56 20042.87 85.97 1.51 13.17 41430.20 19823.61 86.97 OSO I7.07 41419.76 19606.10 87.97 0.50 12.97 4144727 193104.40 88.97 0.50 12.88 41452.76- .9,60,54 89.97 0.49 12.78 41456.27- 18934.56 90.97 0.49 1169 41457.85 1870650 • 91.97 0.48 12.51 4145752 ... 1824418 92.97 0.48 12.51 41455J2`; 1824428 93.97 0.48 12.43 4145119'.: 1901020 Detention Pond Dimensions • Required Storage 33955 cf Number of Ponds 1 - Depth of Pond 1.5 ft Approx. Dimensions of Pond 151 sq ft or 100 ft by 226 ft Area = 22637 sq ft • mm; IBM, law RAINFALL INTENSITY - DURATION CURVES BOZEMAN, MONTANA 6 - RAINFALL POWER CURVE P.REQURENCY X=HR Y=IN/I-IR 5 - - - - - 2 YEAR Y=0.36X-•60 — 5 YEAR . Y=0.52X-•64 0 I J- 100 YEAR 10 YEAR Y=0.64X-•65 z y w I 25 YEAR Y=0.78X-•64 0- 4 - - - - - - 50 YEAR Y=0.92X-•66 — Lu / 50 YEAR 100 YEAR Y=1.01X--67 N Z z 25.YGAR cn ? g _ . . -- - H z I 10 YEAR d w ~ --Z 2 - — 1— — O < 2.YCAR / - 5 YEAR c/) 0 - 0. .5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 DURATION IN MINUTES Slope M 1 O N W A Ln O v co(o O O. N CA) (31 0 v pp Cp O O O O O O CDO O O 0.1 r 0.2 °re 0.3st with. � Trash hPa�y 0.4 °1v 0, 9r0440 nd//tter 0.5 ni a 02. .6 /ja9e nd hay�Pa 0.8 C�/t��atio/7 dOW�O�Pr/an CD 1.0 Near Short C°nto�r d f/°�,J . 0. /y bare Cv/t, grass p °r, �. c and fed astir °Cro 4nt///0. P stra/9 e COL, ppPd r a n 0. 2 pa`ed d rO�NP/and f/ t Ott, Ib�P an o f/ok,� a d k'ood/aha area(s Grassed �J an d f/Oh�j rO`Pr/a 3 beet p/O�l �ater�a� vial �a nd fi°�1 ns 4Ln ands�a// k�estern C) 5cn �p/anO9v//. �Ovntaln r .-. 6 1eS e9/Ons v 2 cr 8 9 10 15 20 i . r r 1� 7 . a • � ja ,I ji • i i - VICINITY MAP 'l x O 4700 i" Pf,OPOSED SITe UF: 11 - BRIDGER KENYON �� Ir �. PEAKS TO i NOBLE I CENTER LUMBER - r i2 _ ' EST_O STRET •• Ted,ile$I 1 t . • ryak I 76eAT °•. . r �• w I - "Jeff _ • t • •t . _ _r • • r/ �•'* arts' �.+< `� eA, ♦ 1 �L� �.e'g'i '' ., yjJ` +�...; c • • : c 7�. 4rtf$ f ~ .�^•�n tip' /R�^ • �.��; �L� !r 1+...z r�r}YFF r �)^•: gr— lw sop �� 1 � � P � � 3� �� g� �,r�" ,�m �+,.��c'�g• 1I,'``��-y�.� ar;� tt o o-��'n�,.t �fir- s,r',s. • • • • ` GRAP IC'. CALE aa`r' �•. j j, �, {,k b� �. +�� ia* 1 ( I FEET ) • • • • .t o/'+' �XS /T y}/ f�_ �.f� i ✓.r •t rjC�•.. c Per ?,'fr .!Z'�Se`3.y' '1 : : 1 inc =1000� �+ �MORRISON FIGURE 1 MAIBRLE iec LOWES • - , e �1�T Y wwr. t �—` �' VICINITY MAP • - -. e n rmn• WORKN/A oAeE✓ i r • �O}- q-i CYL I� :! 12/02r PLOTTED DATE:1kp'/13/7005 • �!'!' �. r;•C DRAWN RN MJD YAt<.tLt00D3 DRAWNC NAPE: 24:F`+• a d1ECl(m er:.ms rRa stEEr--I--OF i h jl !I = ADJACENT LAND USE MAP Row M-1 V J / r B-2 r ~-p • Y.MILE RADIUS ri• -- � 3 �-� �1 �� to � -t• 1 ; i BP Cf B-2 f • ,,C � - M-I Z, M-I • • o!, rSb I J • 7 i Ir . v0 'OT�.� • ♦ '.• 1p • P B-2 I Ce. N •t� • M-I ri 44 1 l� • � R-3 ���- •-� 7 PATRICK STREET � f � NX N _ 11 r ♦ - �_r;'. � OAK STREET • `� ' wca ' � - �- A •�'` v� �'}-� �� 1 •' 6-I • j+-Il�j'.1 �• �' I'jPT J, . � � �rr %lf1-`� t': . �� JR �' Lr"• • �J �+ t /. •-.- ♦ _ rr}� Ji GRAPHIC SCALE s, .; }a -�=t�•T: ti .,, ,' "-. _ll �y j ~ R R- -0 a riw T _J _! Ld F ♦ s . i7� R•3 ' (IN FEET) �^;r • , '( 2 • 1 1 IneD. SOo tl f _=__1 If dE.ls ''ie � •J.'/./( { �.^'r. .' f� 1..N •., !� (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) •x r • !� .. " 11 i. •;,,;�h ;" R.o ,� x �, M.`� MIr ORRISON tNc. FIGURE 2 AIERL ��: -' :- ' st,.; _ "�° '! •,, . .�:., ADJACENT LAND 4� g _—, .` .. i�' ' 1 �....�. �.. N�, USE MAP (i_ 1 .'., - fi(1 L 1✓{- f,�( i Y �' * _ CLIENT:LOWE'S HM1V •r� G NAME: i 9 lr L �•` y �.7 I'�1 I " �,~ 1 `~ t FIELD WORK'N/A DATE:01/05/05 PLOTTED DATE: May/13/2005 { ��.'j� r .�,' D u N3\o0\&,d\•,naits\AERUI.Evq + •'! ���. Ywi�T- 1� .�� .•-.�•T-R 'r - _- _ - T7 w DRAWN BY: WO SCALE:1•-300' CFIECKED BY:MRS PR03 SHEET 1 OF 1 J ,I REGIONAL LAND USE MAP � K 1• cr a \ f PROPOSED LOWE'S SITE • I •�iJ - ,i ti` ! ,;, r x y T 'y �',�✓',� �// / /�, ./� �I;it°I w _��,., '�.�'� �"' � . , .: R ix „ r , q p, ja 1 r " 'I• �.7i 'J�" cb ace„ o .. ',• Ir e * 1�. r I '. I 'r l r 'I ! i .. •. �' E .: .IJTQ;;�!`J. o I� �►i 4r1rI�i `F1 �'9 "' i. Y'.Iea .Y '1 .'(' _•� a s• '} ~. � s ,` " +. � ! y�',,J��L yr { 1 � l +,a ` 'r r� ' '�' •', t�� v< irr 1 ,. "4 �►� �\, •. a i J �� R � •'. � r I Ti 1 .I Y .1 y y y, J J � N!'. r !Cr» �:..,� •1 (sv I a •r S J - Fri �, .•-ft '"r°t • ' •I�' 1 'r �1 f `:��:�4; Ir rn s 1 1 t r �. 'o b I . �. y r I 11� f I f. a e ' + L�•:SIC�2 I .! 56 /3t ti `+ ^. ;i ' r:(° (�•,•, a '' .: i�T I "i.i.w�. I•' �, j4F t r � I `•�• � p c3 '�i �r ail i ',•. 1r a .fr ; •� 7F-E MORRISON n REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AREA = 610 ACRES (BLUE LINE) L�IJMAIERLLl c. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL p/� DEVELOPED REGIONAL COMMERCIAL AREA • = 393 ACRES (GREEN HATCH) GRAPHIC SCALE aarrar ark A9Ma��PlaMsm AREA EXHIBIT CLIENT: n ( IN FEET PLOTTED DATE: May/17/2005 INCLUDES PROPOSED LOWE'S SITE L Lace- LDoo7L FIELD WORK' DATE:12/09/04 1'�1000 DRAWING NAME: (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) DRAWN BY: MJD SCALE: 4:\3373\DD3\Awd\•xWWW\COMDM&MFA DEV0.0PEDW 1k CHECKED BY'MRS pROJ #;3373.203 I SHEET I OF 1 _ • o • TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS mo >d=i 2W� U �7p0 �p K O �JyyU� 3 FWy� r C� Y \• 30' ROW 15' DRIVING LANE 15' DRIVING LANE CURB BACK OF CURB(TYP.) 9'(TYP.) S=3% C.O.B. STD CURB & GUTTER C.0.8. STD CURB & GUTTER S 3" AS11IALT SUB-BASE AS DETERMINED 6" CRUSHED BY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT N TOP SURFACING COMPACTED SUB-GRADE 0 - z a INTERNAL DRIVE TYPICAL SECTION SCALE: 1"=4' o d z VI vi 5� _ x � NORTH SOUTH Z rZr_EQ g RAW RAW W 8 g 60' ROW 0 SIDEWALKt'5'.5"BLVOF 8' PARKING 10' DRIVING LANE 10' DRNING LANE 8' PARKING 5.5' BLVD. SIDEWALK 1.0' S=2% CURB(TYP.) S=3% S=3% 9•CnP) S=2% 1.0' C.O.B. SIDEWALK C.O.B. SIDEWALK Ll \ / 1 C.O.B. STD CURB & GUTTER C.O.B. STD CURB & GUTTER 3"ASPHALT � SUB-BASE AS DETERMINED 6" CRUSHED j BY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT _ _ _ _ _ TOP.SURFACING. COMPACTED SUB-GRADE o 8 N L o { TSCHACHE LANE TYPICAL SECTION x SCALE: 1"=4' o u `g a z z z 0 NORTH SOUTH = R/W rL RAW 0 90'IROW N z 22.5' BLVD. 5' BIKE 12' DOUBLE LEFT 5' BIKE 16.5'. BLVD. 5' LJ O VARIES LANE 10' DRIVING LANE TURNINb LANE 10' DRIVING LANE LANE VARIES SIDEWALK f- \ 0.5'BACK OF Q V S=2% CURB(TYP.) 1'STRIPE r1lTRIPE 9"(TYP.) 5-2% 1.D' J N \ \ 5-3% S=3% Z z - i C.O.B. SIDEWALK LLJ \ \ \ N N C.0.8. STD CURB & GUTTER C.O.B. STD CURB & GUTTER m S 3"ASPHALT BY BGEOTECHNICA DE-BASE AS TERMINED 0 6" CRUSHED TOP SURFACING / COMPACTED SUB-GRADE Z a z BAXTER LANE TYPICAL SECTION N SCALE: 1"=4' m 0 PROJECT N0. n 3373.003 0 o SHEET NUMBER n 0 DRAWING n n n NUMBER i p a I III . it I' BUILDING ELEVATIONS it 1 I�1,IIII _- r 'o—__ —■1111111111111 _ /`� _ =--A�liw� 1 ► •'lllli'' �4�'T: I1 ''tllll _—����I •II'l)! i j --— �Yr�l I �tf`:-• _—--! 1 II�����+���,III�tii:I .Ire— — I I�II�illr = �_ — - --iu%h�ul����!al—►i�lllll�lr l%II'��1;.� !R' ��III I�rlll, �� � •�� ����iluiul���uii�� � _i - `�I ,.....• , , i Il --•�•:��. ,. _ � _. _ � ING t /. .., ��f w�►'�:•iLiriL�i --_-.—.�r11 wA fly/ =r►•-�'�'`•.ihfili�rlrf�'�- _/_..�%%��...�r.'.,�..��r..��_li "•� 17ti•� /!.I���'�_.%J%7 S'=��► //I�fl7'�I���' '�I t/yam\rt1:� / i/�-Q�! �► j•= '-%����� !!_� J •.�I/" _ .1// �. f,..' ir.l► ! �- ',/'I<./. r .//11./._ .I .IH/' •: ii ri ...�! __ •q •ram :r� .1•. _L'. �_ �•!. ./� �y;w-sTia' •.I / I •%'�////L//////,• 1. .///,/!c. .n ./, ./.r: ./ ��:. -PIIbIIi./. 1.:�:.'it::�i• ':/•�!: 'n• - — � •��- • r•G��I� .. r •. ..1 __ .%.G'►/_I,///i' ,,.or'.!:: T..SI:'iti'ti:.':`hl::}.••�,'�!�'�::! :-•.:��'•`:''�:,'��:. /JYQ•' �// O'/ I': '/. +ihM i•. ,1 �. IJ �.��.�� �i v/', c;,r .a•. � /� :rC ( •:1• i/•;i:':4:• .4 :�.�:�: �1�•r 1` �. ``'.1'�\'�r��. :1� � �G,�Ql�•./� ,/ 1 �4r.'+1�' �If,� ./., ♦• /rt '.�j:�F;�:�;• �1.,��,..i:;•:��t:i�'r:. • : :� �JL;.' 1' I �' !/ i •I•. .v 1 , .r .I IL1�1Tti Y•�. •l�/, 'i:!r, nr .,r• ''1'' .Lr•.►, �. .�. .�,. /. n.• ✓�. y •a, a'.:•i:, -i'� L 'l /. .r• ��" :r:•i►It..���'®.//.•:i •1`a•� ! nl rrl It yI' .►. .r. /.♦ r 1. :) J, Ci:�:':':!:'•• .i•%!. :. t'/,. ,.SI,►7_ -.�t�[�. __t11l.' •�. .•t_all. .f.__[i.�a � rani ,�../. .t_.1_s11.._• _ 1... -fu1�7V�,1 ��.�� _ 119_ .,.:.'._ ..�1._yl�ir .c.al,I�:._!,.'•—--- _�.-- - - - .� moo Si _ I I I 1........ _ - - _ _ - _- rl III •11�•J'''C -_ I I��IL��i�II --__—_ '/•1�1�;�g � � r"-'C 1A %�i.y.,.:.��•� I r. 'I ! I/:lir•.}.�•.!,: i '`a:,i�:. l��r 1;r. (I 1',i _ :. °M �_ I�� IUI�I�IIIIIII ':,•'•• 1 ii•;'r•••. M,.Ldo�a;;e' _ �•-��...._ ��If�n.�•. �_ ..:. — �; 1 I 11 —— ._ /:•:1�4i:'!.a..:a"o.ri,l:.:n.!�1..',.i'•1;�o.r,l��Il.�j'llr� 1 I ',,1•i —�-'�=11. _ I— � •I� I -�._:�-�--�••_- � -i' li.�: r,�'1' ro.1.r.,,r ............... IJ __ _ —_ -. _ _�`I. ,.•:� � —��f—'_ -___ �i.1: d''7- 1! r J_4.1_''. ir.- 1 ► • Jilllll�a�l���l���llll 7 �:rl !•r:�i�l ��' 1 �I �� _�i3�. ►,r. ��I���Ir.. rw!�t ..,. �, ��=I�°=_ �Q��"—`.�=--:�%�%iv��ii��..-�ral�___ �'���•r!�� ==9,_Ir-_.�•lt! .' ��•�� PAC �� ► a1 ► � ��j!�Ih!l��II11�=,_r_1_'_.r—y "t_'t_=='�:- - -------� --'--'--�•�'�I�II I`I`�i �I � /r rnt•�ur.�.arr:�.: r_.r ►��� r..►.►�- �b v..:,..rr v r � 1�� �IIIII' / r• wi�I�u�ll�wl .a��I�M �� ii7e�aiu�•!�••�1 err•, .`� iii}:.'i�'1 n'1 ..(:i.�:1:1:�i 1:;!�i:•S.•i a:.:!�.•� rl,:•:r::'.;1�y;li/;1:(.1:!..:r.rl: 1 ! 1. _ _ '�.:' i-rll�ll�-1/)'O�Ir'�i1'r'1'r .'n.� / r•. ir.,jr•ri� �'Yf rr ri l��',i: :'i,(�ir�j r/'�i1�i •.1!'r II /, r"•.r% »i 1/.f.N.1/:/ /lr.l.l i.✓' 1./. •11.1 i1:.11:9; 1.1 •�i'I 1, / r• 1 •1 1/I$... ''I/rlI- J-r�i I 1..__ .. 1•�ii.1.. .•1. • .... �r,11�r .•9:1�►;f��1:%►1•Iarl�,>;=/!:II 3?:`.�rie�:G�/11��(iii/!%I�:j ,1, ;irr;,•1.! t r,r(�I.� ♦ Y•:••�... �• .F 111. 1'• r 'I: !"r��1"ri • r�''•-: '•/ 1.1 •111Y�1'�1'•/1/ •.ice•.•:;1�!' 'i♦ 1'1�1�111-Ir•i�•1-�1.1 t.,\� i�t ►1/,® Ii_-1 f •�� ►1�1`/I 1 jl 1,., Ir l� j,•, l,.•1 r / > k •• . 1 r r 1.e••a•.1.•N,NJ��i.• 1...... _ Aa i�llill r 1' Ij/?1( /� rr11 r41111�e/1, II:_ 1�,�1•a//1/ i' 1,1•.ni•{IIIin/:C' .•,1r•r• „ .::ill�iri•i.:��. ♦•..•• IIC / IS!•.gl��e_ .�11= � ),� rl1 If t/i '� ,� l '!:� 1�.1�• / 1,. / i:•r:' i (,n I• d.�ia•r.1.•�•.•�l��•�•11�r• r/ly }•.. r. .►fie—�- 1.1.•f .,.•r•J1�rJ�:./. i— .3: �.(, : 7.'.l. .1•- %:is rl:I: 11!.I7LS1�.4 la J,•,IJ.. -WU LVA-.N.N_Y_�G2. • VIEWSHIELD PERSPECTIVES [0 • SCHEME A: SACCOCCIA PUD CONCEPT ANALYSIS BAXTER LANEVIN CHAMBER OF I CONCEPTUAL BLDG P.U.D. OPEN SPACE COMMERCE ' ' ! FOOTPRINT (TYP.) I HILTON HOTEL DET. POND06 BANK Lt - v { 07 FUTURE J O O Q Q CONNECTION + I z 2� _ -•-- _ +' LUMBER Q 0 10o OLD CHICAGO �� U MAIN ENTRY o MONTANA O, 0 FURNITURE - 0 V 0of '- GARDEN/ - - - T- SEASONAL f `� I • - - z0 - - - -- - r � J U • � U � U a U LOWE'S GREEN i _ TSCHACHE LANE a '' PIER 1 W IMPORTS LO A* 0 intjr: nsil� W � TO BRIDGER PEAKS • BRIDGER PEAKS VILLAGE SENIOR = Q ARCH ITECTU RE TOWN CENTER HOUSING U B O Z E M A N M O N T A N A A VVV r I_ C� 40 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN & LANDSCAPE PLAN V CP DRAFT COS