Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300223917419377) Z-04033 Gailatin Center Mods to PUD N.19tn Ave. between Baxter Ln_ and Valley Center Rd. Gallatin Center, LP February 24, 2004 N O O W W AtA9 FILE REVIEW FOR COMPLETENESS BY LW IF COMPLETE, GIVE TO CAROL FOR FILE. IF INCOMPLETE, WRITE/CONTACT AP/PLICANT, AND EXPLAIN WHY BY: ToDRC: 3-ilo 0 To DRB: DRB Report due: 3— /9 To Planning Board: Planning Board Report due: To Zoning Commission: Zoning Commission Report due: To City Commission: r City Commission packet due: City Commission Work Session: Notice to Paper 3 A f for publication Notice to Adjoiners/Post: 3�aZlo FILE REVIEW SHEET CITY COMMISSION PROJECT DECISION File Name: n f- File Number. —C3L�Cj?�3 Reference Files: Date Date Done N/A Due Done By DRC initial week review/public comment period begins I v ❑ DRC second week review 3 ❑ DRC final week review -3 30 V V" ❑ ADR or DRB review- if applicable 3 L J) ❑ DRB staff report due- if applicable I$ ❑ WRB review- if applicable ❑ Comments from other review agencies due ❑ Notice to applicant and adjoiners (not less than 15 or more than 30 working days 3ja� 1 ❑ before the City Corrunission hearing) U1v Post notice (not less than 15 or more than 30 working days before the CityElCommission hearing) Newspaper notice (not less than 15 or more than 30 working days before the City Commission hearing) 3 S �'" ❑ City Commission staff report due - ❑ City Commission hearing date ' Q� ❑ Final approval letter to applicant (�n/� ❑ Recommended Recommended Approval Recommended Date N/A Approval with Conditions Denial DRC action ❑ DRB action ❑ WRB action ❑ Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Date City Conin ission action (.- d Date Final Site Plan due: Improvements Agreement required? ❑ Yes XNo Date returned: Date of Final Site Plan approval: Date Final Site Plan approval expires: Date financial guarantee received: Date financial guarantee expires: Date financial guarantee released: Date Temporary Occupancy is granted: Date Final Occupancy is granted: �,�rc L.��i"( � rroject-Acti�ri i LodEM 0 - City of 15ozeman MoDepartment of Planning&Community Development Project Name: - File No: --0LAC)aa Date Activity Staff Staff Cumulative Members Hours Hours o - a S a s o 2 r Oa ls„Q ;.S 3 �nn. r c -{W--3 S . ID No i e= f CAOF BOZEMAN y DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 wvvw.bozeman.net April 21, 2004 Chris Budeski Allied Engineering 32 Discovery Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD, #Z-04033 Dear Chris: At its September April 12, 2004 public hearing, the Bozeman City Commission voted 3-1 to conditionally approve the Conditional Use Permit application for the above referenced project. The proposal was evaluated against the review criteria and requirements of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The Commission's decision was based on the fact that, with conditions, the. proposal complies with the requirements of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance and the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. The decision of the City Commission is final. The conditions for approval are as follows: 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19th Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D.; situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 5. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage. 6. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 7. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the .property owner prior to the issuance of any building pernzits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Any extra plans may be pick up at the Planning Department for you to correct for submittal as the master signage plan. Please remember that this master signage plan needs to be submitted within 6 months for final approval. As condition #7 states, the Planning Department will need a copy of either the binding deed restriction or covenant enforcing the sign restrictions. Attached is a document that you may use for this purpose. This document shall be filed with County Clerk and Recorder's Office so that all successors or assigns shall be noticed of this restriction. If there are any questions that you have for me, do not hesitate to contact me at 586-5266 or the Planning Department at 582-2360. Sincerely, Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner cc: Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240 Page 2 CONDITIONSW APPROVAL FOR A CONDITION R USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION PUD BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman in accordance with the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs at Gallatin Center Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following seven (7) conditions and code provisions: 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage. 6. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 1.8.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 7. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD PAGE 1 OF 2 f CONDITIONS 'APPROVAL FOR A CONDITION SE PERMIT WHEREAS, the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. WHEREAS, all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. WHEREAS, all of the conditions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. WHEREAS, all of the special conditions attached to this Conditional Use Permit shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted seven (7) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as the Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD. DATED THIS DAY OF , 2004. PROPERTY OWNER (Print Name Here) STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2004, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared , known to me to be the , of , the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires (Use four digits for expiration year) #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD PAGE 2 OF 2 z k `'a''Y 3 yq� r'L ,+�t:L'CI ' .xxg � -..Z �s� ti' � ,"n,F. ` ., y-�:.,. fi v ;�# r € s'f, 'M 01 x, COMMTSSS°I�O�N,ST�A FFREPORT TYa . 4" a smirk ' r' MODI�FICA�T�I®NOF GA�LLA�TI�NCE�N�TER�CU�P�I+'>� R'A�PT1�D�k'� �- � r �#Z=04033�� , a� � � .r f•#,wavx k�� ' � ��t�r a .r t, h,s �'4 �ei. n.,raa �'}' z: £ r c��sx '?. <»��.���.»}f��.x .bk;,,.W1� ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION#Z-04033—AN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF A MODIFICATION OF THE GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION CUP FOR A PUD TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE ENTRYWAY PYLON SIGNS. THE PROPERTY, LOCATED WEST OF NORTH 19`h AVENUE BETWEEN BAXTER LANE AND VALLEY CENTER DRIVE, IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED "B-2" (COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT)AND"BP" (BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT). APPLICANT/OWNER: GALLATIN CENTER LP, 5550 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 380, DALLAS, TX 75240. REPRESENTATIVE: ALLIED ENGINEERING, 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: CITY COMMISSION: 7-00 P.M. ON MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2004, IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM OF:CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: LANETTE WINDEMAKER, AICP; CONTRACT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION The property, located west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane.and Valley Center Drive,is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. 1 G A_ GTRON s� -1 0 R- E �`. P •PER+TY R- — v —, BAXTE Al R PROPOSAL Application has been made for a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD is located west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. The subject property is zoned"B-2"(Community Business District)and "BP" (Business Park District). The PUD currently has approval for one (1) interchange pylon sign, and two (2) entryway pylon signs. This application originally proposed one(1)additional entryway pylon sign. The interchange pylon sign stands north of the Valley Center Drive and North 19`"Avenue intersection. The existing entryway pylon sign stands north of the Burke Street and North 191" Avenue intersection. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The property is zoned "B-2" (Community Business District) and "BP" (Business Park District). Numerous commercial buildings already existing within the subject property, including Target, PetSmart, Radio Shack, Ross, etc. North: `B-2" (Community Business)—Commercial, undeveloped and Interstate 90. East: "M-1" (Light Manufacturing District)—Commercial, light industrial and undeveloped. South: "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District)—residential and undeveloped. "M-1" (Light Manufacturing District)—undeveloped. West: "M-1" (Light Manufacturing District)—Cattail Subdivision, undeveloped. "R-O" (Residential Office District)—Cattail Subdivision, undeveloped. "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) — Cattail Subdivision, residential and undeveloped. "R-1" (Residential Single-household Low Density District)—Residential. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 2 ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION This proposal is in conformance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan including the"Regional Commercial and Services" land use designation. "Bozeman is a retail, education, health services, public administration, and tourism hub and provides opportunities for these activities for a multi- county region. Often the scale of these services is larger than would be required for just Bozeman. The Bozeman Deaconess Hospital is an example of a facility with a regional impact.Because of the draw from outside consumers of these services,it is necessary that these types of facilities be located in proximity to significant transportation routes. Since these are large and prominent facilities within the community and region, it is appropriate that design guidelines be established to ensure compatibility with the remainder of the community." (Bozeman 2020 Plan; page 6-24.) REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS The City of Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development application and deviations against the criteria set forth in Section 18.34.090 and Section 18.34.100 of the Unified Development Ordinance The findings outlined in this report include comments and recommended conditions provided by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Design Review Board (DRB). Section 18.34.090 "Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria" In considering applications for site plan approval under this title, the Planning Director, City Commission, DRC, and when appropriate, the ADR staff, the DRB or WRB shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy. The development proposal is in conformance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan including the "Regional Commercial and Services" land use designation. 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations. Staff has found the application in general conformance to this title. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Staff has found the application in general compliance with all other applicable law,ordinances,and regulations. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property. Not applicable. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 3 • • T 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions. Not applicable. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress, egress and circulation. Not applicable. 7.Landscaping,including the enhancement of buildings,the appearance of vehicular use,open space and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation. The applicant is required to provide four(4)square feet of landscaping for every one(1)square feet of signage to be installed at the base(i.e. 360 square feet)that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant is required provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. S. Open space. Not applicable. 9. Building location and height. Not applicable. 10. Setbacks. This property is designated as within a Class I Entryway Corridor and will provide a 50-foot landscaped setback along Nineteenth Avenue. The signage will have to be located beyond the 50- foot landscaped setback. 11. Lighting. Not applicable. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities. Not applicable. 13. Site surface drainage and storm water control. Not applicable. 14. Loading and unloading areas. Not applicable. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 4 15. Grading. Not applicable. .16. Signage. Pursuant to the UDO, every single lot is allowed one freestanding sign of up to 32 square feet. This PUD will have only five pylon signs of 90 square feet. 17. Screening. Not applicable. 18. Overlay district provisions. Not applicable. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties. No comments have been received to date. Any comments received after this writing will be distributed to the City Commission at the public hearing on February 2, 2004. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirements of this title, whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Not applicable. Section 18.34.100"City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits" The City Commission,in approving a conditional use permit,shall review the application against the following review requirements: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. Not applicable. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 5 Baxter Meadows Phase II PUD proposal is an interior phase of a six-phase development. Therefore, it will generally have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b. Special yards, spaces and buffers; c. Special fences, solid fences and walls; d. Surfacing of parking areas; e.Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f.Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress;g. Regulation of signs; h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise, vibrations and odors;j.Regulation of hours for certain activities; k.Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1. Duration of use; m.Requiring the dedication of access rights; and n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner. Any additional conditions stated in this approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Chapter 18.36 "Planned Unit Development Design Obiectives and Criteria" In approving a Planned Unit Development,the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outlined in Section 18.36 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. All Development (1) Does the development comply with all City design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Not applicable. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Not applicable. (3) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings,circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? The elements of the site plan were review with the total PUD. This modification has not impact on the cohesiveness, efficiency or functional organization of the PUD. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 6 materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.)contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Not applicable. (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Not applicable. (6)Park Land.Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration,and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by §18.50.020, BMC? Not applicable. (7) Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Not applicable. (8)Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? Not applicable. Commercial Development (1)If the project contains any use intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment,does it meet the requirements for adult businesses? Not applicable. (2)Is the project contiguous to an arterial street,and has adequate but controlled access been. provided? Not applicable. (3) Is the project on at least two acres of land? The project is at least two acres. (4)If the project contains two or more significant uses (for instance,retail,office,residential, hotel/motel and recreation), do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, etc.? #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 7 • Not applicable. (5) Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Not applicable. (6)Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? Not applicable. (7) Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? Not applicable. (8) Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas (such as additional landscaped areas,open spaces,trails or picnic areas)for the use and enjoyment of those living in,working in or visiting the development? Not applicable. Section 18.30.060 "Design Criteria and Development Standards in Entryway Corridors" In addition to the standard of Chapter 18.34,the following general design criteria and development standards shall apply to all development occurring within the areas described in Section 18.30.030. A. The proposed development shall also comply with all applicable design standard and guidelines, including the Design Objectives Plan for entryway corridors. Not applicable. B. Setback, Parking, Building, and Landscape Standards. The setback from any entryway corridor roadway right-of-way shall be landscaped,including the screening or buffering of parking areas, through the use of berms, depressed parking, native landscape materials surrounding and within parking areas, or other means in order to preserve the area's natural views. In addition to the qualitative design standard and guidelines in the Design Objectives Plan for entryway corridors, parking areas and buildings shall: 1. Be set back at least 50 feet from any Class I entryway corridor roadway right-of-way. 2. Be set back at least 25 feet from any Class II entryway corridor roadway right-of-way. This property is designated as within a Class I Entryway Corridor and will provide a 50 foot landscaped setback along Nineteenth Avenue. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 8 PUBLIC COMMENT The Planning Office has not received any public comment as of the writing of this staff report. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Staff,the Bozeman Development Review Committee(DRC)and the Design Review Board (DRB)have reviewed the modification to the approved Gallatin Center Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development against the criteria set forth in Chapter 18.34 and Chapter 18.36 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Based on the evaluation of said criteria and findings by the Planning Staff, staff finds that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance and recommends the following conditions of approval and code provisions to the City Commission: 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four(4) square feet of landscaping for every one(1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base(i.e. 360 square feet)that demonstrates a variety of season color,shape and texture,and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19'h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane,depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs,for review and approval by the Planning Office,and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. 6. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 190' Avenue frontage. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION The Bozeman Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the modification to the approved Gallatin Center Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs and as a result recommends to the City Commission conditional approval of said application with conditions and code provisions outlined in this staff #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 9 i report. On March 23,2004,the Design Review Board(DRB)voted to recommend conditional approval of the project. Draft minutes of that meeting are attached. The Planning Staff has identified various code provisions that are not currently met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings and conditions of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final PUD Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.66 OF THE BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal. Design Review Board draft minutes of March 23, 2004. cc: Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240 Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 10 z, '4rRq;U- LIg"Awdi �• ;rig r g g DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2004 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Vice Chairperson Bill Hanson called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. and directed the secretary to record the attendance. Members Present Staff Present Christopher Livingston Lanette Windemaker, Contract Planner Carol Asleson Tara Hastie, Recording Secretary Dawn Smith Bill Hanson Joseph Thomas Mel Howe Visitors Present Chris Budeski Gene Graf ITEM 2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS A. CHAIRPERSON Dawn Smith B. VICE CHAIRPERSON Bill Hanson ITEM 3. MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 24, 2004 Vice Chairperson Hanson called for corrections or additions to the minutes of February 24, 2004. MOTION: Ms. Asleson moved, Mr. Livingston seconded, to approve the minutes as presented. The motion carried 4-0. Mr. Howe and Ms. Smith entered the proceedings. ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 1. Gallatin Center-PUD Mods #Z-04033 (Windemaker) North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive * A request to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to allow an additional freestanding sign. Gene Graf and Chris Budeski joined the DRB. Planner Windemaker presented the Staff Report, noting the locations of the existing signs and the request for an additional entryway pylon sign. She stated Staff had requested a master signage plan for the PUD. She added she Citv of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,2004 1 would be suggesting a condition for DRC that would limit the total number of entryway pylon signs. Mr. Graf stated the project was "in the process" when the first signs were approved and there had become a need for the tenants and customers of the subdivision to have signage at the accesses. He added there would be four total entryway pylon signs requested. Mr. Budeski stated the original layout for Gallatin Center was substantially different from what it was today. He stated there were fewer major tenants, and the number of other tenants was unknown on the future lots. Mr. Budeski illustrated how the proposed signs would match the existing ones. Ms. Smith asked Planner Windemaker if the sign request was not in conjunction with a PUD, how the signs would be addressed. Planner Windemaker responded there would be one freestanding sign for each lot. She added the size allowable for the signs in a PUD were larger, but there were to be fewer of them. Mr. Livingston asked if one of the proposed signs was in the original proposal. Mr. Graf responded that two entryway pylon signs were included in the first proposal. Ms. Smith asked for the distance between each of the four signs proposed for North 19`h Avenue. Planner Windemaker responded the distance between each sign averaged 1,000+ feet. Mr. Livingston stated he thought the signage was strategically placed, with regard to the speed limit on North 19"' Avenue, so the consumer could miss a sign and still not miss the location completely. Ms. Smith stated she was indifferent about the proposal, but was worried that the signs would look exactly the same and be placed the same distance from the street. She suggested varying the sign design, distance from the street, and height. She added the out parcel would have at least one sign and probably two. Mr. Thomas stated the future of the street, it being an entryway corridor, made it seem that the avenue would become cluttered with signage. He stated he was indifferent about the proposal as well, and suggested just one sign at Cattail Street and North 19`h Avenue. He added he thought a total of two signs would be sufficient, but there would not be enough square footage to represent the tenants so it was irrelevant. Ms. Asleson stated she agreed with Ms. Smith and thought people would get confused if all the signs were alike. Vice Chairperson Hanson stated the DRB concurred North 19`h Avenue was different than they City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,2004 2 0 PL IM, R V would like because the speed limit was fifty miles per hour. He stated he thought there should be clearly marked entrances and tenant spaces. He stated he was supportive of the proposal with Staff conditions. Mr. Graf stated he thought the sign at Cattail Street should have continuity with the rest of Gallatin Center's signs. He stated he did not know what some of the signs would look like as no specific tenants have arranged to occupy those retail spaces. He added the signs could be completely different. Ms. Smith stated the signs could not be completely different because the DRB was approving only the ones proposed. Planner Windemaker added the applicant would have to return to the DRB if any other signage was proposed. Mr, Graf stated he did not think the general sign concept was a problem. Planner Windemaker responded Staff did not specify a certain color for the signs in the conditioning of the project. She added only the conditioned style, square footage, design, height, backlighting, and materials used to construct the signs had been specified. Ms. Smith stated the DRB had to assume the project would be developed as proposed. MOTION: Mr. Livingston moved, Ms. Asleson seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval for Gallatin Center PUD Mods #Z-04033 with Staff conditions and the addition of condition #6) that the PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19" Avenue frontage. Ms. Smith suggested the signs be less alike. Mr. Budeski stated there was no reason why the signs couldn't be different colors. Ms. Asleson stated the landscaping would break up any conformity caused by the signs themselves. Motion carried 4-2 with Ms. Smith and Mr. Thomas in opposition. ITEM 5. PUBLIC COMMENT—(15 —20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.) There was no public available for comment. ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the DRB, the meeting was adjourned at 4:17 p.m. Dawn Smith, Chairperson City of Bozeman Design Review Board City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,2004 3 CONDITIONSM APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONA USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION PUD BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman in accordance with the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs at Gallatin Center Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following seven (7) conditions and code provisions: I. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`" Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19`" Avenue frontage. 6. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 1.8.34.I OO.C.1 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 7. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD PAGE 1 OF 2 CONDITIONSM APPROVAL FOR A CONDITION L USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. WHEREAS, all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. WHEREAS, all of the conditions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. WHEREAS, all of the special conditions attached to this Conditional Use Permit shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted seven (7) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as the Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD. DATED THIS DAY OF ,2004. PROPERTY OWNER (Print Name Here) STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2004, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared , known to me to be the , of , the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at , Montana My Commission Expires (Use four digits for expiration year) #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD PAGE 2 OF 2 r. a • - H 0 - needs repair. Commissioner Krauss then suggested awarding $1,000 now and consider awarding another $1,000 at a later time. He noted his preference is to set aside a pre-determined amount of money for grant requests, rate the requests, and award the money accordingly. Ms. King-Rodgers noted when these spay/neuter clinics are offered and the number of unwanted animals decreases, it gives the animal control officers time to address the puppy mills, abuse/neglect reports, and take care of other issues, such as education, rather than overpopulation problems. The public, particularly young people, needs to be educated on responsible, caring pet ownership. Commissioner Youngman stated that, as a point of clarification, the Commission gets practically no requests from the community for money; and this request directly relates to a city service; animal control. She is concerned if the Commission doesn't commit to something now, the Task Force won't have enough funds to book the veterinarians. It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Hietala,that the City commit to a $2,000 donation to the Spay/Neuter Task Force in support of the Phase II spay/neuter clinic, and that staff be directed to include the $2,000 in the FY 2005 budget. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Krauss, and Mayor Cetraro; those voting No, none. Update re library - Library Board of Trustees member Library Board of Trustees member Jerry Bancroft, chair of the Building Committee, presented an update on the library, saying bids for the new library will be opened on April 27th; and they would like to come back to the Commission in mid-May with a total financing package to see what kind of partnership they can work out with the City. The new library will be a beautiful building that is unique, functional, and efficient; and the city benefits from having the contaminated site cleaned up. The Board hopes to be able to break ground for the new library sometime this spring. Commissioner Hietala asked about the projected costs. Mr. Bancroft responded the last estimate of costs was over $9 million. The Board is hoping the bids come back lower than that, but it is a difficult bidding climate because of escalating prices. Public hearing-Conditional'Use Permit for Planned Unit Development'-modifications to previously approved Gallatin`Center PUD, to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs (along west side of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Road) (Z-04033) � f This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, as requested by Gallatin Center, LP, under Application No. Z-04033, for modifications to the previously-approved Gallatin Center Planned Unit Development,to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The subject development is located along the west side of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Road. Mayor Cetraro opened the public hearing. Contract Planner Windemaker presented the staff report, noting one interchange pylon sign and two entryway pylon signs were originally approved. They are now requesting an additional entryway pylon sign, but the recommendation is for two additional entryway signs rather than request another modification at a later date. Staff has reviewed this application in I ight of the applicable criteria and recommends conditional approval. Staff's comprehensive findings can be found in the written staff report. Both the Design Review Board and the Development Review Committee recommend conditional approval; six conditions plus the two standard conditional use permit conditions. The applicants' reasoning for requesting additional signage is because they originally anticipated having large anchor tenants rather than smaller retailers,which requires more signage. Chris Budeski,Allied Engineering,stated the applicants are requesting the additional signage because of changes in the type and size of businesses in Gallatin Center, and they want to assure safe entry into Gallatin Center from North 19th Avenue since traffic is heavy and speeds are high. They are proposing an additional sign at the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Cattail Street since the designation for Cattail 04-12-04 Commissioner Krauss inquired as to how much time the Health Department is spending on the West Nile virus. Health Officer Nelson responded none right now; but they are preparing a West Nile campaign, including,posters, pamphlets, and a media campaign. A lot of what the Health Department did last summer regardi6g'West Nile virus is now being done by the State Department of Health. The Health Department does workrin partnership with the Department of Fish and Wildlife and veterinary services to track occurrences It is expected there will be a large and early increase in the number of cases of West Nile virus this ye�\ �/ Commissioner Krauss asked if there were any chance that large employers could have a checkoff system to haver,oney deducted from paychecks,on a voluntary basis,to support the health services safety net. Health Officer Nelson stated that would be a very good idea. She believes United Way was one of the partners that went forward to do a community needs assessment and was instrumental in helping the Gallatin Commu n�it�y Clinic to be successful. United Way and Bozeman Deaconess Hospital have been supportive of the community's dental needs, and there is a)fledgling group to help with referrals for acute care. The Health Department expects to have a federally funded grant within the next few years for dental services. Request for funding f6r Spay/neuter clinic, Phase I ; Ellen King-Rodgers Spay/Neuter Task Force Included in the Commissioners'packets was aycopy of the written request from Ellen King-Rodgers, Spay/Neuter Task Force, fo�r funding assistance f6r the upcoming Spay/Neuter Clinic, Phase II. Ms. Ellen King-Rodgers reviewed the Spay/Neuter Task Force proposal for financial support for a Phase II spay/neuter clinic. She noted that in October, 2002 Bozeman held a spay/neuter event during Pet Care Week, and in five days 1�1'67 animals were spayed and neutered for free. Five"A Team"and nine local veterinarians, 14 nurses, 14 veterinary technicians,250 volunteers, Bozeman Deaconess Hospital,Same Day Surgery, and 52 restaurants a0took part in that event. Phase II means the local community takes over the financial expenses, which breaks down to approximately $20 per animal. The Phase II event is scheduled for November 12, 13, and 14, with the 12th being a set-up day. One year after the initial event in Bozeman there was a 13 percent drop in animal intakes at the Humane Society, a 21 percent drop in the number of animals picked up by Animal Control, and an 8 percent increase in pet adoptions. The Galloping Dog Agility Club has raised $267 from its fundraiser; the County Commission has donated $1,000 and use of the fairgrounds, the Community Co-op isInd'ing a Four Percent Day, and a private donor has pledged $2,000. The Task Force is asking the City of(Boeman to commit to a $2,000 donation for Phase II. Commissioner Youngman�askedwhy the Task Force is requesting twice as much from the City of Bozeman as from Gallatin County: I King-Rodgers stated because the County is donating the fairgrounds, and because last year the Hum�anejSocietytook in 418 strays from the city and only 250 from the county. Acting City Manager Breystated that\hais event is scheduled for November; so if the Commission should decide to act favorablylthey should direct\the Clerk of the Commission to include that amount in next year's budget. The source of funding would be the general fund. Commissioner Krauss noted he also pays county taxes, so he has already made a donation through the county. He also helpsysupport the fairgrounds,Vs well; and that is double-dipping for the citizens of the City of Bozeman. He suggested adding this request\to all the other requests received, comparing those requests, and weighing jhe n before handing money out1ad hoc. Ms. King-Rodge/4s said she respects what Commissioner Krauss is saying, but the veterinarians need to be booked now. / / CommissionerlYoungman stated she would normally,�igree with Commissioner Krauss; but the fact that the veterinarians need to be booked now needs to be takenNnto account, as well as the positive impact on animal control to �he community and the reduced expenses &that division. Mayor Cetraro expressed his agreement with Commissioner Krauss that the budget process and the granting of requests needs further discussion. Commissioner Krauss asked if any costs were going to be incurred between now and June 30th. Ms. King-Rodgers replied they are asking for a commitment now, but no costs will be incurred unless equipment 04-12-04 Street has been changed from a local street to a collector. This sign will be located within the 70-foot setback, so it will not be right on the roadway. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Cetraro closed the public hearing. Commissioner Krauss asked if there is any reason to limit a single tenant to only one entryway pylon sign. He prefers to eliminate condition five. Planner Windemaker responded that condition was included because of the number of tenants and the available sign space. Acting City Manager Brey stated the Commission can consider eliminating that condition as long as it isn't a restatement of a code requirement. Commissioner Youngman said she will not approve this request if condition five is eliminated because it was staff's recommendation. If the sign is on the pylon closest to the store entrance, it will direct traffic more effectively and safely than if the store is advertised in several locations. She feels this is a reasonable condition that relates to traffic safety. It was moved by Commissioner Hietala, seconded by Commissioner Krauss, that the Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, as requested by Gallatin Center, LP, under Application No. Z-04033, for modifications to the previously approved Gallatin Center Planned Unit Development, to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The entryway pylon signs to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four(4)square feet of landscaping for every one(1)square foot of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape, and texture; and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by Administrative Design Review(ADR) staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by ADR staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a master plan for entryway signage along the entire North 191h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD, situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs for review and approval by the Planning Office; and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the master plan will be considered. 5. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 191h Avenue frontage. 6. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 7. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors, or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval, or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Krauss, and Mayor Cetraro; those voting No being Commissioner Youngman. 04-12-04 • - 10 - Public hearing - preliminary plat for Courtyard Townhomes minor subdivision - allow subdivision of 0.413 acres described as Tract D-1A (the north 48 feet of Lots 1-6) and Tract D-1B (the south 92 feet of Lots 1-3. and the south 92 feet of the east 10 feet of Lot 4) Block D Plat B-40-B Beall's Second Addition Amended, into five residential lots and one common area - Rocky Mountain Engineers for Paul Violich Trust and Vosti 1988 Trust (northwest corner of North Black Avenue and East Beall Street) (P-03030A) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the preliminary plat for Courtyard Townhomes minor subdivision, as requested by Rocky Mountain Engineers for Paul Violich Trust and Vosti 1988 Trust under Application No. P-03030A, to allow subdivision of 0.413 acres described as Tract D-1A and Tract D-1 B, Block D, Plat B-40-B, Beall's Second Addition Amended, into five residential lots and one common area. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of North Black Avenue and East Beall Street. Mayor Cetraro opened the public hearing. Assistant Planner Kozub presented the staff report, noting the area is currently a gravel parking and car storage area. Staff has reviewed this application in light of the applicable criteria and recommends conditional approval. Staff's comprehensive findings can be found in the written staff report. The Planning Board does have a concern with condition eight, easement for the drive aisle; and Project Engineer Murray has written a letter addressing those concerns. The applicants had previously submitted a seven-lot application but asked to have the hearing continued to allow them time to scale back to five lots and one common area, which eliminates any variances. Access to the rear garages and parking will be provided by a drive aisle off of East Beall Street that connects to the alley between North Black Avenue and North Tracy Avenue. This will require that this alley be paved. The Unified Development Ordinance does not require parkland dedication for minor subdivisions. Open space will be provided in the rear patios and front yard. The Planning Office received eleven letters,from eight persons, in opposition to the original project for seven townhouses. Planning Staff has received two letters regarding this project. Ray Center, Rocky Mountain Engineers, stated the developers are in agreement with all the conditions, except number eight. They prefer the access easement be stated as an access easement, rather than a public access easement. As an access easement, the unit owners would still have access through the common area; but if it is a public access easement, the homeowners have to rely on the Police Department to rectify any problems. People can park in a public right-of-way for 48 hours, and the police cannot do anything about it. The applicant doesn't want to delay this project, so he will accept condition eight if it will hold up the project; but he does prefer it to be an access easement only. Commissioner Youngman said she is confused by the applicant's reasoning on condition eight, noting no one can park in the middle of a drive aisle for 48 hours. The easement is just for a drive aisle, and it has been done for years on similar projects. City Attorney Luwe stated the police will cite persons who park in the middle of a drive aisle unless there is an emergency need to get into that area; and in that case, the car would be towed. There is no city code that allows parking in the drive aisle for 48 hours. Mr. Center stated it was passed on to him that parking is allowed in the public right-of-way for 48 hours before the vehicle must be moved. City Attorney Luwe replied that he is not sure who told Mr. Center that, but it may be related to parking time allowed before the vehicle must be moved. Mr. Center responded the applicant is concerned with burdening city services with calls to move vehicles; they would prefer to allow the homeowners to solve these problems without getting the police involved, which is the reason for their request. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Cetraro closed the public hearing. Commissioner Youngman noted a number of significant suggestions made by the neighbors have been incorporated into the design of this project, including more buffer, a change of roof line, and change of materials to better blend with the character of the neighborhood. She acknowledged that this applicant has worked well with staff and made constructive changes to this proposal. Commissioner Hietala questioned the 15-foot setback in front of these units. Assistant Planner 04-12-04 CI*F BOZEMAN • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net Memorandum To: City Commission From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Planner Meeting Date: April 12, 2004 Subject: #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD—Addition of standard CUP conditions 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19th Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. 6. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19th Avenue frontage. 7. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 18.34.1 OO.C.1 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation . housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 8. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Page 2 il 0 Page 1 of 3 Janette Windemaker From: "Bozeman Clerk" <rsullivan@virtualtownhall.net> To: "Agendas" <BozemanMT_Agendas@lists.virtualtownhall.net> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 9:10 AM Subject: City Commission Agenda 04/12/2004 THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA April 12, 2004 1. Signing of Notice of Special Meeting - 6:00 p.m. 2. Staff presentations re department budget requests for Fiscal Year 2004-2005: (1) Tom Adams, Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent; (2) John Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent 3. Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. 4. Pledge of Allegiance and Moment of Silence 5. Minutes - March 31 and April 5, 2004 6. Consent Items - a. Commission Resolution No. 3672 - intent to create SID No. 675, improvements to North 19th Avenue from Baxter Lane to Valley Center Road; set public hearing for May 3, 2004 b. Commission Resolution No. 3673 -joint resolution with County Commission relating to creation of Special Improvement District No. 676 c. Commission Resolution No. 3674 - intent to create SID No. 676, improvements to Valley Center Road from North 19th Avenue to just west of North 27th Avenue; set public hearing for May 3, 2004 d. Commission Resolution No. 3675 -joint resolution with County Commission relating to creation of Special Improvement District No. 677 e. Commission Resolution No. 3676 - intent to create SID No. 677, improvements to traffic signal at intersection of North 19th Avenue and Valley Center Road; set public hearing for May 3, 2004 f. Commission Resolution No. 3677 -joint resolution with County Commission relating to creation of Special Improvement District No. 678 g. Commission Resolution No. 3678 - intent to create SID No. 678, installation of traffic signal at intersection of North 19th Avenue and Cattail Street; set public hearing for May 3, 2004 h. Acknowledge receipt of staff report - annex±36.00 acres described as a portion of Tract 1, COS No. 2050 - Sandan, LLC (for Cattail Creek Subdivision, Phase III) (A-04003) (DS) i. Commission Resolution No. 3679 - intent to annex±-36.00 acres described 4/12/2004 Page 2 of 3 a.a portion of Tract 1, COS No. 2050t public hearing for May 10, 2004 • j. Approval of request for one-year extension of preliminary plat approval for Annie Subdivision, Phase III (along north side of Durston Road at North 27th Avenue) k. Authorize Acting City Manager to sign - Acceptance of Public Street Easement - David M. MacDonald and Cheryl A. MacDonald - 45-foot-wide easement across a portion of Tract IA, COS No. 1855A (for north side of West Babcock Street) 1. Application for temporary Beer and Wine License - Emerson Cultural Center - Friday, April 9, 6:00 p.m. to midnight ("Live at the Emerson") in. Authorize expenditure of$4,763.95 as partial reimbursement for costs billed by the State of Montana Department of Environmental Quality for the Bozeman Solvent Site for the period July 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003 n. Building Inspection Division report for March 2004 o. Claims Motion and vote to approve, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the necessary actions 7. Public comment Limited to any public matter within the jurisdiction of the City Commission not on this agenda; 3-minute time limit per speaker 8. Swearing in of three new firefighters Mayor to administer oath to new firefighters 9. Presentation re budget for City/County Board of Health for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 - Health Officer Stephanie Nelson Listen; ask questions 10. Request for funding for spay/neuter clinic, Phase II - Ellen King-Rodgers, Spay/Neuter Task Force Discussion; possible motion and vote (to or not to provide funding) 11. Update re library - Library Board of Trustees member Holly Brown Listen 12. Public hearing - Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development - modifications to previously approved Gallatin Center PUD, to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs (along west side of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive) (Z-04033) (LW) Conduct public hearing; motion and vote (to or not to approve) 13. Public hearing - preliminary plat for Courtyard Townhomes minor subdivision - allow subdivision of 0.413 acres described as Tract DA A (the north 48 feet of Lots 1-6) and Tract D-1 B (the south 92 feet of Lots 1-3, and the south 92 feet of the east 10 feet of Lot 4), Block D, Plat B-40-B, Beall's Second Addition Amended, into five residential lots and 4/12/2004 Page 3 of 3 orte common area - Rocky Mountain Oineers for Paul Violich Trust and • Vosti 1988 Trust (northwest corner of North Black Avenue and East Beall Street) (P-03030A) (SK) Conduct public hearing; motion and vote (to or not to approve) 14. Discussion - FYI Items - Updates from Commissioners - Updates from Acting City Manager and other staff members 15. Adjournment Motion and vote to adjourn City Commission meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Ron Brey, at 582-2306 (TDD 582-2301). 4/12/2004 CITOF BOZEMAN 0 +` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _a Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 vwwv.bozeman.net Memorandum To: City Commission From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Planner Meeting Date: April 12, 2004 Subject: #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD—Addition of standard CUP conditions 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. 6. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19th Avenue frontage. 7. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing . grant administration • neighborhood coordination 8. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Page 2 CITY COMMISSSION STAFF REPORT MODIFICATION OF GALLATIN CENTER CUP FOR A PUD #Z-04033 ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION#Z-04033—AN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF A MODIFICATION OF THE GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION CUP FOR A PUD TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE ENTRYWAY PYLON SIGNS. THE PROPERTY, LOCATED WEST OF NORTH 19" AVENUE BETWEEN BAXTER LANE AND VALLEY CENTER DRIVE, IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED "B-2" (COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT)AND"BP"(BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT). APPLICANT/OWNER: GALLATIN CENTER LP, 5550 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 380, DALLAS, TX 75240. REPRESENTATIVE: ALLIED ENGINEERING, 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: CITY COMMISSION: 7:00 P.M. ON MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2004, IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM OF CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: LANETTE WINDEMAKER, AICP; CONTRACT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION The property, located west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive,is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. PATRON �c�c 1 ° E P •PER+TY R- a R-3 v -1 gq E R PROPOSAL Application has been made for a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD is located west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. The subject property is zoned"B-2"(Community Business District)and "BP" (Business Park District). The PUD currently has approval for one (1) interchange pylon sign, and two (2) entryway pylon signs. This application originally proposed one(1)additional entryway pylon sign. The interchange pylon sign stands north of the Valley Center Drive and North 19`h Avenue intersection. The existing entryway pylon sign stands north of the Burke Street and North 19`h Avenue intersection. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The property is zoned "B-2" (Community Business District) and "BP" (Business Park District). Numerous commercial buildings already existing within the subject property, including Target, PetSmart, Radio Shack, Ross, etc. North: "B-2" (Community Business)—Commercial, undeveloped and Interstate 90. East: "M-1" (Light Manufacturing District)—Commercial, light industrial and undeveloped. South: "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District)—residential and undeveloped. "M-1" (Light Manufacturing District)—undeveloped. West: "M-1" (Light Manufacturing District)—Cattail Subdivision, undeveloped. "R-O" (Residential Office District)—Cattail Subdivision, undeveloped. "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) — Cattail Subdivision, residential and undeveloped. "R-l" (Residential Single-household Low Density District)—Residential. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 2 ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION This proposal is in conformance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan including the"Regional Commercial and Services" land use designation. "Bozeman is a retail, education, health services, public administration, and tourism hub and provides opportunities for these activities for a multi- county region. Often the scale of these services is larger than would be required for just Bozeman. The Bozeman Deaconess Hospital is an example of a facility with a regional impact.Because of the draw from outside consumers of these services,it is necessary that these types of facilities be located in proximity to significant transportation routes. Since these are large and prominent facilities within the community and region, it is appropriate that design guidelines be established to ensure compatibility with the remainder of the community." (Bozeman 2020 Plan; page 6-24.) REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS The City of Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development application and deviations against the criteria set forth in Section 18.34.090 and Section 18.34.100 of the Unified Development Ordinance The findings outlined in this report include comments and recommended conditions provided by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Design Review Board (DRB). Section 18.34.090 "Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria" In considering applications for site plan approval under this title, the Planning Director, City Commission, DRC, and when appropriate, the ADR staff, the DRB or WRB shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy. The development proposal is in conformance with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan including the "Regional Commercial and Services" land use designation. 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations. Staff has found the application in general conformance to this title. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Staff has found the application in general compliance with all other applicable law,ordinances,and regulations. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property. Not applicable. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 3 • • 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions. Not applicable. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress, egress and circulation. Not applicable. 7.Landscaping,including the enhancement of buildings,the appearance of vehicular use,open space and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation. The applicant is required to provide four(4)square feet of landscaping for every one(1)square feet of signage to be installed at the base(i.e. 360 square feet)that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant is required provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 8. Open space. Not applicable. 9. Building location and height. Not applicable. 10. Setbacks. This property is designated as within a Class I Entryway Corridor and will provide a 50-foot landscaped setback along Nineteenth Avenue. The signage will have to be located beyond the 50- foot landscaped setback. 11. Lighting. Not applicable. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities. Not applicable. 13. Site surface drainage and storm water control. Not applicable. 14. Loading and unloading areas. Not applicable. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 4 15. Grading. Not applicable. 16. Signage. Pursuant to the UDO,every single lot is allowed one freestanding sign of up to 32 square feet. This PUD will have only five pylon signs of 90 square feet. 17. Screening. Not applicable. 18. Overlay district provisions. Not applicable. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties. No comments have been received to date. Any comments received after this writing will be distributed to the City Commission at the public hearing on February 2, 2004. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirements of this title, whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Not applicable. Section 18.34.100"City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits" The City Commission,in approving a conditional use permit,shall review the application against the following review requirements: 1.That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. Not applicable. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 5 Baxter Meadows Phase II PUD proposal is an interior phase of a six-phase development. Therefore, it will generally have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b. Special yards, spaces and buffers; c. Special fences, solid fences and walls; d. Surfacing of parking areas; e.Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f.Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress;g. Regulation of signs; h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise, vibrations and odors;j.Regulation of hours for certain activities; k.Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1.Duration of use; m.Requiring the dedication of access rights; and n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner. Any additional conditions stated in this approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Chapter 18.36 "Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria" In approving a Planned Unit Development,the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outlined in Section 18.36 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. All Development (1) Does the development comply with all City design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Not applicable. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Not applicable. (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g.,buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? The elements of the site plan were review with the total PUD. This modification has not impact on the cohesiveness, efficiency or functional organization of the PUD. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 6 materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.)contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Not applicable. (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Not applicable. (6)Park Land.Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration,and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by §18.50.020, BMC? Not applicable. (7) Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Not applicable. (8)Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? Not applicable. Commercial Development (1)If the project contains any use intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment,does it meet the requirements for adult businesses? Not applicable. (2)Is the project contiguous to an arterial street,and has adequate but controlled access been provided? Not applicable. (3) Is the project on at least two acres of land? The project is at least two acres. (4)If the project contains two or more significant uses(for instance,retail,office,residential, hotel/motel and recreation), do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, etc.? #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 7 Not applicable. (5) Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Not applicable. (6)Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? Not applicable. (7) Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? Not applicable. (8) Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas (such as additional landscaped areas,open spaces,trails or picnic areas)for the use and enjoyment of those living in,working in or visiting the development? Not applicable. Section 18.30.060 "Design Criteria and Development Standards in Entryway Corridors" In addition to the standard of Chapter 18.34,the following general design criteria and development standards shall apply to all development occurring within the areas described in Section 18.30.030. A. The proposed development shall also comply with all applicable design standard and guidelines, including the Design Objectives Plan for entryway corridors. Not applicable. B. Setback, Parking, Building, and Landscape Standards. The setback from any entryway corridor roadway right-of-way shall be landscaped,including the screening or buffering of parking areas, through the use of berms, depressed parking, native landscape materials surrounding and within parking areas, or other means in order to preserve the area's natural views. In addition to the qualitative design standard and guidelines in the Design Objectives Plan for entryway corridors, parking areas and buildings shall: 1. Be set back at least 50 feet from any Class I entryway corridor roadway right-of-way. 2. Be set back at least 25 feet from any Class II entryway corridor roadway right-of-way. This property is designated as within a Class I Entryway Corridor and will provide a 50 foot landscaped setback along Nineteenth Avenue. #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 8 PUBLIC COMMENT The Planning Office has not received any public comment as of the writing of this staff report. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Staff,the Bozeman Development Review Committee(DRC)and the Design Review Board (DRB)have reviewed the modification to the approved Gallatin Center Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development against the criteria set forth in Chapter 18.34 and Chapter 18.36 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Based on the evaluation of said criteria and findings by the Planning Staff, staff finds that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance and recommends the following conditions of approval and code provisions to the City Commission: 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four(4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base(i.e. 360 square feet)that demonstrates a variety of season color,shape and texture,and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 191" Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane,depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs,for review and approval by the Planning Office,and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. 6. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19'h Avenue frontage. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION The Bozeman Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the modification to the approved Gallatin Center Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs and as a result recommends to the City Commission conditional approval of said application with conditions and code provisions outlined in this staff #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 9 report. On March 23,2004,the Design Review Board(DRB)voted to recommend conditional approval of the project. Draft minutes of that meeting are attached. The Planning Staff has identified various code provisions that are not currently met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings and conditions of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final PUD Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.66 OF THE BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal. Design Review Board draft minutes of March 23, 2004. cc: Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240 Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 #Z-04033 Modification of Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Commission Staff Report 10 • 1 )OR-EL I M N A i sE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2004 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Vice Chairperson Bill Hanson called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. and directed the secretary to record the attendance. Members Present Staff Present Christopher Livingston Lanette Windemaker, Contract Planner Carol Asleson Tara Hastie, Recording Secretary Dawn Smith Bill Hanson Joseph Thomas Mel Howe Visitors Present Chris Budeski Gene Graf ITEM 2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS A. CHAIRPERSON Dawn Smith B. VICE CHAIRPERSON Bill Hanson ITEM 3. MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 24, 2004 Vice Chairperson Hanson called for corrections or additions to the minutes of February 24, 2004. MOTION: Ms. Asleson moved, Mr. Livingston seconded, to approve the minutes as presented. The motion carried 4-0. Mr. Howe and Ms. Smith entered the proceedings. ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 1. Gallatin Center PUD Mods #Z-04033 (Windemaker) North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive * A request to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to allow an additional freestanding sign. Gene Graf and Chris Budeski joined the DRB. Planner Windemaker presented the Staff Report, noting the locations of the existing signs and the request for an additional entryway pylon sign. She stated Staff had requested a master signage plan for the PUD. She added she City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,2004 1 LI' E would be suggesting a condition for DRC that would limit the total number of entryway pylon signs. Mr. Graf stated the project was "in the process" when the first signs were approved and there had become a need for the tenants and customers of the subdivision to have signage at the accesses. He added there would be four total entryway pylon signs requested. Mr. Budeski stated the original layout for Gallatin Center was substantially different from what it was today. He stated there were fewer major tenants, and the number of other tenants was unknown on the future lots. Mr. Budeski illustrated how the proposed signs would match the existing ones. Ms. Smith asked Planner Windemaker if the sign request was not in conjunction with a PUD, how the signs would be addressed. Planner Windemaker responded there would be one freestanding sign for each lot. She added the size allowable for the signs in a PUD were larger, but there were to be fewer of them. Mr. Livingston asked if one of the proposed signs was in the original proposal. Mr. Graf responded that two entryway pylon signs were included in the first proposal. Ms. Smith asked for the distance between each of the four signs proposed for North 19" Avenue. Planner Windemaker responded the distance between each sign averaged 1,000+ feet. Mr. Livingston stated he thought the signage was strategically placed, with regard to the speed limit on North 19" Avenue, so the consumer could miss a sign and still not miss the location completely. Ms. Smith stated she was indifferent about the proposal, but was worried that the signs would look exactly the same and be placed the same distance from the street. She suggested varying the sign design, distance from the street, and height. She added the out parcel would have at least one sign and probably two. Mr. Thomas stated the future of the street, it being an entryway corridor, made it seem that the avenue would become cluttered with signage. He stated he was indifferent about the proposal as well, and suggested just one sign at Cattail Street and North 19" Avenue. He added he thought a total of two signs would be sufficient, but there would not be enough square footage to represent the tenants so it was irrelevant. Ms. Asleson stated she agreed with Ms. Smith and thought people would get confused if all the signs were alike. Vice Chairperson Hanson stated the DRB concurred North 19" Avenue was different than they City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,2004 2 Ell, would like because the speed limit was fifty miles per hour. He stated he thought there should be clearly marked entrances and tenant spaces. He stated he was supportive of the proposal with Staff conditions. Mr. Graf stated he thought the sign at Cattail Street should have continuity with the rest of Gallatin Center's signs. He stated he did not know what some of the signs would look like as no specific tenants have arranged to occupy those retail spaces. He added the signs could be completely different. Ms. Smith stated the signs could not be completely different because the DRB was approving only the ones proposed. Planner Windemaker added the applicant would have to return to the DRB if any other signage was proposed. Mr. Graf stated he did not think the general sign concept was a problem. Planner Windemaker responded Staff did not specify a certain color for the signs in the conditioning of the project. She added only the conditioned style, square footage, design, height, backlighting, and materials used to construct the signs had been specified. Ms. Smith stated the DRB had to assume the project would be developed as proposed. MOTION: Mr. Livingston moved, Ms. Asleson seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval for Gallatin Center PUD Mods #Z-04033 with Staff conditions and the addition of condition #6) that the PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage. Ms. Smith suggested the signs be less alike. Mr. Budeski stated there was no reason why the signs couldn't be different colors. Ms. Asleson stated the landscaping would break up any conformity caused by the signs themselves. Motion carried 4-2 with Ms. Smith and Mr. Thomas in opposition. ITEM 5. PUBLIC COMMENT—(15 —20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.) There was no public available for comment. ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the DRB, the meeting was adjourned at 4:17 p.m. Dawn Smith, Chairperson City of Bozeman Design Review Board City of Bozeman Design Review Board Minutes-March 23,2004 3 s 3ffidauit of Publication STATE OF MONTANA, SS. County of Gallatin being duly sworn, deposes and says: That-5—he is of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published Bozeman, Gall tin County, Montana; and that the notice here unto annexed �— OqO33 &A %) �) has been J�] r a correctly published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said paper for one comeen4ige , the first of which publication was made on °p o the day of G�yvvl 2014, and the last on -� CL the day of W �N0 A B Ij ubs ribed and sworn to before me s i"day of 2 . i ✓...-Ali aJ .• � Notary Public for the State of Montana, OFtAO ` residing at Bozeman,Montana. Notary Public for the State of Mcntwna Residing at Bozeman,Montana My Commission Expires June 27,2004 . , BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, March 28, 2004 B. . SCOREBOARD Championship - Szczerbiak 5-9 0-0 11.Olowokendi 35 1-1 Overtime-5, Boston, Samsonov 14 LPGA NABISCO CHAMPIONSHIP 1 ; , r Sunday,March 28 �/ 7.Totals 39-85 13-14 98. (Slegr),4:32.Penalties-None. Saturday At The Georgia Dome EmwY'/RADIO SCHEDULE L.A.CLIPPERS(82) Shots on goal-Montreal 10.8-4 22. At Mission Hills Country Club,Dinah _ SATURDAY'S SCORES Atlanta Barnes 1-4 40 2,Brand 7-16 8-11 22, Boston 12-11-11-5-39. Shore Tournament Course i; •, + EAST Xavier(26-10)vs. Duke(30.5), 5:05,4;' . Kaman 7-13 5-7 19,Maggette 5-13 5-6 17, Power-play Opportunities--Montreal 0 of Rancho Mirage,Calif. Bentley 4-1,Mass.-Lowell 0-4Z; P.m. Subject t0 Change House 3-9 0-0 7,Ely 3.5 1-2 7,Simmons 1- 3;Boston 1 of 4. Purse:$1.6 million 0ucknell 2-5,Navy,1-1' SUNDAY,MARCH 28 11:30 a.m. (ABC) 5 2-2 4,Drobnjak 0-0 0-0 0,Dooling 0-14 Goalies-Montreal,Theodore 32-26-5 Yardage:6,520;Par:72 California,Pa.56,Indiana,Pa.42 ST.LOUTS REGIONAL *0 0,Overton 2-3 0-0 4.Totals 29-69 21-28 (39 shots-36 saves).Boston,Raycroft 28- Third Round I�Canisius 5-0,St.•Peter's 1.2 ' Semifinals Auto racing Philadelphia at Boston, 82. 17-8(22-20). a-amateur �.'DeSales 4-2,King's,Pa`33 ' ,-, Friday,March 26 NASCAR,Nextel Cup, 4:30 p.m.(ESPN) Minnesota 26 26 27 19 -98 A-17,565(17,565).T-2:27. Grace Park 7289.67 - 208 Duquesne 4-3,Rhode Island 7.2 At Edward Jones Dome L.A.Clippers16 26 21 19 - 82 Aree Song 66.73-69 - 208 Eastern 2.12,Neumann 411' St.Louis Food City 500,11 a.m. Pro hockey 3-Point Goals-Minnesota 7-17 Ottawa 1 1 0 0 - 2 lung YeonLee 69.69-71 - 209 i7armingdale 2-1,Old Westbury 0.3 Kansas 100,Alabama-Birmingham 74., '� (FOX) St. Louis at Chicago or (Sprewell 4-8,Hudson 2-3,Szczerbiak 1- Toronto 0 1 1 0 - 2 a-Michelle Wie, 69-72-69 - 210 Fordham 6-5,Dayton 4-3,2nd game.11 Georgia Tech 72,Nevada 67 ' 'I I Golf Anaheim at Minnesota,2 3,Hoiberg 0-1,Cassell 0.2),L.A.Clippers First Period-1,Ottawa, Ray 1(Neil, Karrie Webb 68-71-71 - 210 innings ' - Championship 3-5(Maggette 2-3, House 1-2). Fouled Vermette),8:33. Stacy Prammanasudh 71-71-69 - 211 Franklin Pierce 7-9, American Sunday,March 28 PGA Tour,The Players p.m.(ESPN) out-Madsen.Rebounds-Minnesota 48 Second Period-2,Toronto,Francis 12 Rosie Jones 67-73-71 - 211 International 41 At Edward Jones Dome a (Garnett 15), L.A. Clippers 46(Kaman (Johansson,Leetch),2:17(pp).3,Ottawa, Wendy Doolan 70.69-72 - 211 Geneva 14-12,Walsh 5-2 St.Louis 4• Championship,final Tennis 12).Assisits-Minnesota 24(Garnett 5), Phillips 5(Havlat,Bonk),16:20. Catriona Matthew 67-75-70 - 212 George Washington 4-1,Massachusetts • .Kansas(24-8)vs.Georgia Tech(26.9), ' round, 11:30 a.m.(NBC) ATP-WfA Tour,NASDAQ- L.A. Cllppers 15 (Simmons 4). Total Third Period-4,Toronto,McCabe 16 Mi-Hyun Kim 71-70-71 - 212 1.2 2:40 p.m. LPGA, Kraft Nabisco 100 Open,early round, fouls-Minnesota 25,L.A.Clippers 1.6. (Francis,Kilger),9:26 Penalties-None. Dottie Pepper ' 68-70-74 - 212 f lGordon 4-9,New England Coll.3-6 � Technicals-Minnesota Defensive Three Overtime-None. Young Kim 7472-67 - 213 John Jay 7.20,Lehman 3-2 PHOENIX REGIONAL Championship,final noon(ESPN) Second,L.A.Clippers coach Dunleavy 2, Shots on goal-Ottawa 9-5.12-4-30. Cristie Kerr 71-71-71 - 213 Johns Hopkins 4-4,Ursinus 33 Semifinals round,2 p.m. (ABC) Women's college hoops Maggette 2.Ejected-L.A.Clippers coach Toronto 8-11-33-25. Carin Koch 7472.71 - 213 Juniata 8,Elizabethtown 7 Thursday,March 25 - Dunleavy, Maggette. A-19,424 Power-play opportunities-Ottawa 0 of Karen Stupples 7476-68 - 214 . Lafayette 12-4,Holy Cross 2-5 ' At America West Arena Men,s college basketball NCAA tournament, (18,964). 2;Toronto 1 of 2. Christina Kim .72-72.70 - 214 Lehigh 148,Army 39 Phoenix (NCAA tournament,re Mideast Regional Semifi- Goalies-Ottawa, Lalime (2 shots-2 Hee-Won Han 72-71-71 - 214 Mercyhurst 7,Wayne St.5 Connecticut 73,Vanderbilt 53 . saves),Prusek 14-5-3(6:18 First.23 shots- Candle Kung 69-75-71 - 215 Montclair St.6,FIN 0 Alabama 80,Syracuse 71 gional finals,doublehead- nal,Louisiana Tech vs. I 1 21 saves). Toronto, Belfour 31-19-6(30 Annika Sorenstam 71-76.69 - 216 N.J.Tech 4-1,Teikyo-Post 1-6 Championship er, Kansas vs. Georgia Duke,10 a.m.(ESPN); shots-28 saves). Michele Redman 73-73-70 - 216 NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE A-19,480(18,819).T-NA. Wend Niagara 9.2,Manhattan 2-1 Saturday,March 27 y Ward 72-7470 - 216 Notre Dame 5-4,West Virginia 3-0 At America West Arena Tech, 12:40 p.m.; Xavier Minnesota vs. Boston At A Glance Pat Hurst 72-76.69 - 217 All Times EST Penn 5.9,Columbia 3-19 Phoenix vs. Duke,3:05 p.m. College,noon;Stanford' Carolina 2 1 0 -,3 Jeong Jang 76.71-70 - 217 EASTERN CONFERENCE N.Y.Islanders. 0 1 1 _ 2 ,Rachel Teske 75.71-71 - 217 St. nipiac 1,Mount eSt.hi Marys,Md.0 Connecticut 87,Alabama 71 CBS vs.Vanderbilt,5 m.; Atlantic Division St.Anselm 3-2.Stonehill 1-3 (CBS) p' ' First Period-1, Carolina, Rourke 1 Brendle Burton 70.76-71 - 217 St.John Fisher 7-10,Hilbert 2-4 FINAL FOUR Pro basketball Baylor vs.Tennessee,7 W L TOL Pts GF GA (Brind'Amour,Vrbata),8:42.2,Carolina,Hill Se RiPak 72-73-72 - 217 x-Philadelphia 39 20 14 6 98223 180 13(Staal,Vasicek),17:57. Donna Andrews 70-74-73 - 217 Temple 10-4,La Salle 5-1 San Antonio St.John's 9.1,Georgetown 2-4 At The A Dallas at Orlando, p.m. (ESPN2) x-New Jersey 40 24 12 2 94199 157 Second Period-3, N.Y. landers, Lorena Ochoa 67-76-74 - 217 o Y. Wagner 5-1,Fairleigh Dickinson 1.4 Semifinals L I N.Y.Islanders 36 28 10 4 86221 199 Kvasha 15(Jonsson),5:16.4,Carolina, W.New England 2-3,Albertus Magnus Saturday,April 3 N.Y.Rangers 26 38 7 8 67200 239 Svoboda 2(Wallin,Hedican),8:31. 0.2 Oklahoma State (31.3)vs. St. Louis Chicago 55 (Johnson•8), Atlanta 60 Pittsburgh 21 46 8 4 54181 294 Third Period-5,N.Y.Islanders,Parrish ' SOUTH COLLEGE1 (Jackson 10).Assists-Chicago 17(Pargo Northeast Division 21(Czerkawski,Ronnin 11:30(pp). champion,TBAg)• Alabama 2,Mississi i 1 6), Atlanta 19 (Terry 6). Total fouls- W L TOL Pts GF GA Shots on goal-Carolina 9.9.6-24.N.Y. NASDAQ•100 OPEN PP Atlanta champion vs.Connecticut(31- ,,Anderson,S.C.9-5,Pfeiffer 67 g),Tgp MEN Chicago 26,Atlanta 24.Technicals-Fizer, x-Boston 39 18 14 7 99198 177 Islanders 12-9-17-38. Saturday Barry 7-1,Tampa 33 Championship NCAA DIVISION I TOURNAMENT Atlanta Defensive Three Second.Flagrant x-Toronto 42 24 10 3 97230 202 Power-play Opportunities--Carolina 0bf At Tennis Center at Crandon Park Berry 6-1,Cumberland 4-16 Monday,April 5 At A Glance fouls-Bradley.A-12,466(19,445). x-Ottawa 40 22 10 6 96249 174 4;N.Y.Islanders 1 of 8. Key Biscayne,Fla. , Birmingham-Southern_ 8, Coastal Semifinal winners All Times EST x-Montreal 40 28 7 4 91201 182 Goalies-Carolina, Weekes 23-28-10 Purse:Men,$3.45 million(Masters); Carolina 3 - EAST REGIONAL NEW YORK(85) Buffalo 35 32 7 4 81207 210 (38 shots-36 saves). N.Y. Islanders, Women:$3.06 million Tier 1) Campbell 10-2,Troy St.6.4 NCAA DIVISION II TOURNAMENT At Pepsi Arena Anderson 4-11 3.4 12,K.Thomas 1-8 2- Southeast Division DiPietro 21-17-5(24-21). Surface:Hard-Outdoor • ' Catawba 13-13,Newberry 6.1 At A Glance Albany,N.Y. 1 2 4,Mohammed 6.8 1-5 13,Johnson 5-12 W L TOL Pts GF GA A-16,234(16,234).T-2:20. Singles Charleston Southern 9,Liberty 8 Regionals Championship 5.5 17,Marbury 5-14 2-2 12,Baker 5-8 5- yTampa Bay 45 21 8 5103236 182 Men Clemson 7,Wake Forest 4 Championship Saturday,March 27 6 16,Norris 2-7 1-1 5,Sweetney 1-4 2-2 4, Atlanta 32 35 8 4 76208 235 Buffalo 2 0 0 0 - 2 Second Round Coll.of Charleston 14,Appalachian St. Maine 2,Wisconsin 1,OT Harrington 0.3 2-4 2.Totals 29-75 23-31 Carolina 28 31 13 6 75159 191 Pittsburg 0 2 0 0 - 2 Todd Reid,Australia,def.Martin Verkerk �, PP Saturday,March th Florida 27 33 14 4 72172 205 10, Kennesaw State 84,Southern Indiana 85. First Period-1, Buffalo, Drury 18 (15),Netherlands,46,6-4,7.5. 'Delta St.9,Henderson St.6 59 WEST REGIONAL DETROIT(100) Washington 22 45 9 2 55174 241 (McKee), 13:53. 2, Buffalo,Dumont 21 Dominik Hrbaty (27), Slovakia, def. At World Arena Prince 8-11 2-2 20,Okur 3-6 1-2 7, WESTERN CONFERENCE Briere 17:36 Bohdan Ulihrach,Czech Republic,6.3,3.6, ;.East Carolina 7,Memphis 1 (Drury, ), (pp). P Elizabeth City St.6,Virginia St.5 NAIA DIVISION I TOURNAMENT Colorado Springs,Colo. B.Wallace 6-14 0.2 12,R.Hamilton 6.13 S Central Division Second Period-3,Pittsburgh,Fata 16 6-3. Elon 1.1,ETSU 10 At A Glance Championship 5 18,Billups 4-11 3-3 11,Campbell 4-8 5- W L TOL Pis GF GA (Kraft, Strbak), 7:22(pp). 4,Pittsburgh, Tommy Robredo(19),Spain,def.Olivier Emory 10,Palm Beach Atlantic 6 , ' All Times EST Saturday,March 27 5 13,James 1-4 0-0 2,Williamson 5.8 33 y-Detroit 45 20 11 2103243 178 Koltsov 9(Kostopoulos,Kraft),15:28. Rochus,Belgium,4-6,6.1,7-6(3). Erskine 3.7,Mount Olive 2-14 At Kansas City,Mo. Denver 1,North Dakota 0 13,Ham 0-0 42 0,Hunter 1-2 2-2 4,Milicic St.Louis 36 28 11 2 85181 190 Third Period-None. Radek Stepanek,Czech Republic,def. Ferrum 15,Greensboro 12 Quarterfinals 45 0-0 0.Totals 38.82 21-26 100. Nashville 35 28 11 4 85205 209 Overtime-None. Penalties-Dumont, Fernando Verdasco,Spain,7.6(6),7-6(3). Florida 17,Kentucky6 NORTHEAST REGIONAL New York 21 28 18 18 - 85 Columbus 24 42 8 4 60169 224 Buf(holding),2:58. Vince Spadea,United States,def.Maal Saturday,March 27 At Verizon Wireless Arena Chicago 20 39 -11 7 58181 241 Florida A&M 8-21,Coppin St.2-9 Mountain State,W.Va. 87,Oklahoma Detroit 32 35 23 10 -100 g Shots on goal-Buffalo 131432-28. Safin(31),Russia,7-6(7),67(4),6.4. Florida Atlantic 7,Jacksonville 3 Manchester,N.H. 3-Point Goals-New York.414(Johnson Northwest Division Pittsburgh 12-9-13-5-39 Augustin Calleri (20),Argentine,def. Baptist 84 W L TOL Pts GF GA g Fla.International 2,Ark.-Little Rock 1 Concordia,Calif.61,Lindsey Wilson,Ky. Semifinals 2-5,Baker 1-1,Anderson 1-3,Norris 42, Power-play Opportunities-Buffalo 1 of Lars Burgsmulier,Germany,6-3,7.5. Florida Southern 3-3,Florida Gulf Coast 58 Saturday,March 27 Marbury 0-3), Detroit 3-9 (Prince 2-3, x-Colorado 38 22 13 5 94225 188 . 4;Pittsburgh 1 of 3. Radek Stepanek,Czech Republic,def. 2-5 Mobile,Ala.75,Oklahoma City 62 Boston College 5,Niagara 2 R.Hamilton 1-1,B.Wallace 0-1,Billups 0-4). Vancouver 39 24 10 5 93218 189 Goalies-Buffalo, Biron 24-17-5 (39' Fernando Verdasco,Spain,7-6(6),7-6(3). Florida St.10,North Carolina 6 Georgetown,Ky.64,Barber-Scotia,N.C. Michigan 4,New Hampshire 1 Fouled out-Baker.Rebounds-New York Calgary 40 29 7 3 90195 172 shots-37 saves).Pittsburgh,Caron 8-24.5 Jiri Novak (14),Czech Republic,def. Georgia College 6.5,N.C.-Pembroke 1-4 60 Championship 53(Mohammed 12),Detroit 50(B.Wallace Edmonton 34 27 12 5 85212 199 (28-26). Stefan Koubek,Austria,6-4.6.0. Georgia Southern 8,Georgia Tech 7 Semifinals Sunday,March 28 12). Assists-New York 16 (Anderson, Minnesota 26 28 20 3 75171 171 A-12,964(16,958).T-2:29. Thierry Ascione,France,def.Feliciano Monday,March 29 Pacific Division Georgia St.2,Lipscomb 1 Boston College(28-8-4)vs. Michigan Norris,Marbury 4),Detroit 28(Billups 13). Lopez(23),Spain,7-6(4),6-4. Hawaii 8,Louisiana Tech 1 . Mountain State, W.Va. (36-1) vs. (27-13-2),4 p.m. I Total fouls-New York 27, Detroit 22. W L TOL Pts OF GA Washington 0 0 1 - i Paradorn Srichaphan(9),Thailand,def. Huntingdon 15-0,Fisk 21-0 Georgetown,Ky.(30-7),7 p.m. Technicals-New York Defensive Three x-San Jose 40 20 12 6 98209 175 Tampa Bay 1 2 1 - 4 Ricardo Mello,Brazil,6-1,1-6,63. Jackson St.8-12,Alcorn St.7-9 Concordia,Calif.(32-4)vs.Mobile,Ala., MIDWEST REGIONAL Second,Detroit Defensive Three Second. x-Dallas 40 24 13 1 94185 164 First Period-1,Tampa Bay,Lecavalier Jonas Bjorkman (26), Sweden, def.. Jacksonville St.7-4,Samford 3.0 (29.9) 9 p.m. At Van Andrl Arena A-22,076(22,076). Los Angeles 28 26 16 8 80199 205 31(Taylor,Sarich),9:15. -Taylor Dent,United States,7.6(4),6-2. James Madison 13,N.C.-Wilmington 12 Grand Rapids,Mich. Anaheim , 28 33 10 8 74180 208 Second Period-2, Tampa Bay, Fernando Gonzalez (21), Chile, def.. Lee,Tenn.6-9,Martin 45 Semifinals NEW JERSEY(104) Phoenix 21 33 18 6 66183 233 Lecavalier 32(Boyle,Lukowich),2:25.3, Karol Kucera,Slovakia,7-5,7-6(7). NATIONAL INVITATION TOURNAMENT Two points for a win,one point for a tie Sebastien Grosjean(12),France,def. LeTourneau 5-3,Louisiana College 3-10 � Saturday,March 27 Rogers 4-9 42 10,Jefferson 12-20 9- Tampa Bay,Modin 28(Stillman,Richards),g At A Glance g y ) Limestone 9.5,Belmont Abbey 8-4 All Times EST Minnesota 5,Notre Dame 2 11 35,Collins 4-8 0-0 8,Kitties 9-22 2-2 and overtime loss. 17:43. Nicolas Lapentti,Ecuador,6-3,6-4. Louisiana-Lafayette 4,W.Kentucky 3 Minnesota Duluth 5,Michigan State 0 24,Harris 8-13 1-2 19,A.Williams 1-3 0-0 zclinched playoff spot Third Period-4,Washington,Pettinger Andy Roddick(2),United States,def. Quarterfinals Championship 2,Armstron 42 0-0 0,Scalabrine 2-5 2-2 7 (Tvrdon, Cutta), 7:03. 5, Tampa Bay, Karol Beck,Slovakia,6.2,6.4. Louisiana-Monroe 6,Texas-Arlington 5, Wednesday,March 24 g yclinched division g Rutgers 72,Villanova 60 Sunday,March 28 Saturday's Games 10 innings 6,Goldwire 41 0-0 0.Totals 40.83 1419 Richards 25 (Stillman, Boyle). 10:02. Carlos Moya (5), Spain, def. David Minnesota 27-13-3 vs. Minnesota Detroit 2,Colorado 0 y (cross-checking), Sanchez,Spain,4-6,6.4,6-4.L n 11,Mississippi or 6 Michi an 88,Hawaii 73 ( ) CLEVELAND Penalt-Verot, Was g), p - Lynchburg 12-27,Emory&Henry 6.5 g Duluth 27-12-4,1 m. ( ) N.Y.Rangers 3,Philadelphia 1 16:36. Roger Federer 1, Switzerland, def. Thursday March 25 ( ) p• CLEVELAND 107 g ( ) St.Louis 4,Chicago 3,OT Miami 6-1,Penn St.1-0 Ore on 65,Notre Dame 61 E.Williams 48 40 8,Boozer 8-15 5-6 g Shots on goal-Washington 8-4-10- Nikolay Davydenko,Russia,G2,36,7-5. Milligan 5.8,Coker 4-3 g WOMEN 21,II auskas 7-12 35 17,011ie 42 0-0 0, Calgary 3,Los Angeles 2,OT 22.Tampa Bay8.13-11-32. Xavier Malisse, Belgium, def. Albert g Iowa State 77,Marquette 69 g Boston 3,Montreal 2,OT g Millsaps 4-13,Southwestern,Texas 2.8 Semifinals FROZEN FOUR GLANCE James 15-29 1410 41,K.Brown 5-5 1-3 Power-play Opportunities-Washington Costa(22),64,6.2. All Times EST Ottawa 2,Toronto 2,tie Mississippi College 7-5,Texas-Tyler 6.4 Tuesday,March 30 , 12,Newble 1-1 0.0 2,Battle 1-2 0-0 2, 0 of 1;Tampa Bay 0 of S. Guillermo Canes,Argentina,def.Sjeng At Dunkin Donuts Center Carolina 3,N.Y.Islanders 2 Goalies-Washington,New Orleans 9,Arkansas St.8 At Madison Square Garden Nailon 2-6 0-0 4.Totals 43.80 19-24 107. Yeats 42-0(32 Schalken(13),Netherlands,61,3-0,default. North Alabama 3-1,West Florida 1-2 Naw York Providence,R.I. New Jersey 28 24 26 26 -104 Buffalo 2,Pittsburgh 2,tie shots-28 saves).Tampa Bay,Khabibulin 28- Andre Agassi(4),United States,def. N.C.-Asheville 10.Radford 3 New (19 12)vs.Iowa State(2 -12), Friday,March 26 Cleveland 24 20 31 32-107 Atlanta 3,Florida 0 17-7(22-21). Mariano Zabaleta,Italy,6-0,7-0(1). Semifinals Tampa Bay 4,Washington 1 A-18,812 N.C.Stale 12,Virginia 1 3-Point Goals-New Jersey 10.18 (19,758).T-NA. Women 7 p.m. Minnesota 5,Dartmouth 1 Columbus 3,Nashville 2,OT North Florida 8-3,Francis Marion 0.5• Oregon(18.12)vs.Michigan(21-11).9 (Kitties -3, Jefferson 2, Harris 2-3, Second Round g g Harvard 2,St.Lawrence 1 Vancouver 3,Dallas 2,OT North Georgia 11-2,Brewton Parker 1-3 Rogers 2.3,Goldwire 0-1),Cleveland 2-3 Atlanta 1 i 1 - 3 Alicia Molik(24),Australia,def. Amy Northwestern St.4,Lamar 3 p'm' Sunday,March 28 Sunday's Games (K.Brown 1-1,James 1-2). Fouled out- Florida 0 0 0 - 0 Frazier,United States,46,Test 62. Championship Championship Yugoslavia, def. Phoenix at Edmonton,4 p.m. First Period-1, Atlanta, Stefan 17 Jelena Doktc (12), Yu Pittsburgh 3-5,Virginia Tech 0-4 Thursday,April i None.Rebounds-New Jersey 43(Rogers g Minnesota(294 2)vs.Harvard(3431), St.Louis at Chicago,4 p.m. Prairie View A&M 7,Southern U.2 Semifinal winners,7 m. 7),Cleveland 47(Boozer 11).Assists-New (Kovalchuk,Exelby).3:33. •Nicole Pratt,Australia,walkover. Presbyterian 6-1,Wingate 4-8 p' 4 p.m. Anaheim at Minnesota,4 Jersey, Second Period-2,Atlanta,Heatle 10 .Silvia Farina Elia(11),Italy,def.Mara yt g Jersey 27(Harris.Jefferson 7),Cleveland Y y Third Place N.Y.Islanders at New Jersey,5 p.m. Kovalchuk,Kaberle, Richmond 3-5,St.Joseph's 0-4 WOMEN 25(James 13).Total fouls-New Jersey 23, ( ) 1:16(pp). Santangelo,Italy,3-G,6.3,7-6(3). Rollins 31;.Eckerd 2-2 Dartmouth (24-7-2) vs. St. Lawrence Dallas at San Jose,9 p.m. . Third Period-3, Atlanta, Heatle 11 Emilie.Loit 32,France,def.Mariana NCAA TOURNAMENT Cleveland 19. Technicals-New Jersey Y ( 1 S.C.-Spartanburg 4,Columbus St.2 At ce (27-10.1).12:30 p.m. Defe ive Three Second. A-20,562 (Robitaille,Kozlov),14:43. Diaz-Oliva,Argentina,6-1,7-6(4), N.Y,Rangers 1 2 0 - 3 St.Leo 8-5,Nova Southeastern 6.8 All ST 12 g Shots on goal- 6-6-7-19. Gisela Dulko,Argentina,def.Viktoriya Southern Miss.3,South Florida 2 EAS NAL BASKETBALL hiladetphia 0 1 0 - i Florida 15-6-9-30. Kutuzova,Ukraine,6.4,4-1,ret. • 1 First Period-1,N.Y.Rangers,Jagr 31 Power-play Tennessee 7,Auburn 6 Sem, nals • O (76) p y OpPortu Atlanta 1 of Nadia Petrova(8),Russia,def. Maria Texas Southern 12-11,Grambling St.4 Marion 39 0-0 6,Stoudemire 8-19 47 (Hlavac,M.Green),14:56. 3;Florida 0 of 5. ' Kirilenko,Russia,6-2,6-2. Saturday,March 27 NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION Second Period-2, N.Y. Rangers, Goalies-Atlanta,Lehtonen 3-0-0 9 At The Hartford Civic Center. At A Glance 20,McDyess 2-4 1-2 5,Jacobsen 1-4 4-4 1 Green 4(Lundmark,Balej),1:05.3,N.Y. 19, Vera Dskaya(28), Russia, def. Lino Texas to l 7 M afford St.4 Hartford,Conn. 6,J.Johnson 6-19 3-5 15,Lampe 6-10 0-0 shots-30 saves).Florida,Shields 3-5.1(19- Kra Francesca S hiav,Russia,C, It ly, The Citadel 7,Wofford 4 All Times EST Rangers,Hop 23(Hlavac,Jagr),3:(G(Gagne, i6). Francesca Schiavone 15, Italy, def. Penn State 55,Notre Dame rb Tot is 31-78 1 -2 0-0 4,Harvey 3.6 2-2 8. P ( g A-17,204 19,250 T-2:13. Lubomira Kurha cova,Slovakia)6-1,G3. Tulane 9,Charlotte 5 EASTERN CONFERENCE 4, Philadel hie, Amonte 20 Ga net Connecticut 63,UC Santa Barbara 55 Totals 31-78 1420 76. ( )• 1 Atlantic Division Zhamnov),13:24. Tusculum 6.7,Mars Hill 2-4 Championship SAN ANTONIO(105) Anna Smashnova•Pistolesi(13),Israel, P P W L. Pct GB Third Period-None. Tuskegee 12-16,LeMoyne-Owen 1-1 r Bowen 2-4 0.1 4,Duncan 6.10 2-2 14, Columbus 0 i 1„ ,1 - 3 d_ef.Rita Grande,Italy,gent&3. Monde rch 29 ,. x-New Jersey "'42' 30 ,583 - , r *1- i Shots on goal-N.Y.Rangers'S146- UCF 5.5,Stetson 3-0p I , 5�_�� - N is 2-6 40 4!Parkef 4S 4 .. tilNashville 1 0 2 0 0 - 2 PaolaSuarez(9),Argentina,def.Denise �(�}n� At The 'vicCenter NUami 4 37,I.486 7 .-..,k !..Philadelphia_9_-9-21-39. _ .•l. , First Period-None -b�_W_102i hiadkovajCzech�Republic,6-1;62J11TI:YVa?Commonwealth-5;Hefstra 3 rP►ra do:`.r rS 11 _ +1(iu r T"R _ T 5-9 2-2'14,Rose a•Y" P Y PP. g Second Period-1, Ile,Hamhuis Venus Williams 2 United States„def. New York 34",40 .459 9 r [Power-la0 ortunities=N:Y.�Ran ers' tf-* Valdosta St.7-10.Ala.-Huntsville 1-7 peon State 28- s.Connecticut 28- 'v'• - G 45�40 9"D.Bro4-812- O, ( ( Boston 32 40 '.444 10 of 3;Philadelphia 0 of 6. 7 - Vanderbilt6,Georgia 4 Horr 48 0-0 9,Willis 3-7 1-2 7,Hart (Johansson,Elat),1 .2,Nashville, Jie Zheng,China,6.4,6.4. VMI 1rb Brown 7 4),7 p.m. Philadelphia 31 42 .425 11'h 1 12,Ward 1-0 0-0 2.Totals 4488 12-16 Goalies-N.Y.Rangers,Valiquette 1-0-0 Johansson 12(Walker,Sullivan),15:51.3, Vera Zvonareva (7), Rus ia, def. W.Carolina 12,Davidson 10 Washington 23 '49 .319 19 1 12 (39 shots-38 saves).Philadelphia,Esche Columbus,Nash 40(Cassels,Westcott), Tathiana Garbin,Italy,6-3,7-6(3)). MIDEAST REGIONAL Orlando 19 55 .257 24 21-10-6(12-9),Burke(3:13 second,9-9). Webber 6.4,Flagler 45 18:44. Svetlana Kuznetnsova(10),Russia,def. Semifinals Central Division Phoenix 13 22 18 23 - 76 A-19,658(19,519).T-2:16. West Alabama 10.5,Montevallo 7•]: Sunday,March 28 . W L Pct GB San Antonio 31 29 27 18 -105 Third Period-4,Columbus,Zherdev 12 Anne Kremer,Luxembourg,7-5,6-3. West Georgia 15.2,Lincoln Memorial 4 At Ted Constant Convocation Center 3-Point Goals--Phoenix 45(Marion 0.1, (Svitov,Nash),14:05(pp).; Shenay Perry,United States,def.Fabiola 1 Norfolk,Va. z-Indiana 53 19 .736 - Jacobsen 0.1,J.Johnson 43),San Antonio Colorado 0 0 0 - 0 Overtime-5, Columbus, Wright 9 Zuluaga(16),Colombia,6.7(3),7-5,6.1. William&Mary 6,Delaware 5,12 in- Duke 29-3 vs.Louisiana Tech 29-2, x-Detroit 47 27 .635 7 Jaco sen 01, .Joh Ginobili 1-1,Hart nio Detroit 0 1 1 - 2 (Letowski,Spacek),2:03.Penalties-None. Nathalie Dechy(21),France,def.Tatiana pings ( ) ( ) New Orleans 37 36 .507 16/z First Period-None. Shots on goal-Columbus 9-10.143- Perebi nis,Ukraine,4-6,7-6(6),64. Winthrop 8,High Point 1 Noon Milwaukee 36 r 36 .500 17 Harry 1-4,D.Brown 41,Bowen 42).Fouled Second Period-1,Detroit,Schneider 32.Nashville 11-12-13-1-37. r Lisa Raymond ( ) Boston College 27-6 vs. Minnesota out-None. Rebounds-Phoenix 48 )'mood Russia, United Slates,def. MIDWEST g ( ) Cleveland •32 40 .444 21 14(Lidsirom,Hull),19:50(pp). Power-play Opportunities--Columbus 1 Tanana Panova,Russia,5.7,7-5,6-1. Augustana 7-8,Cornell,Iowa 6-7 (23-8).30 minutes after first game Toronto 30 42 .417 23 (Stoudemire 9),San Antonio 53(Duncan Third Period-2, Detroit, Datsyuk 29 of 5;Nashville 0 of 7. 1 . Daniela Hantuchova 27 Championship Atlanta 24 49 .329 291h 10).Assists-Phoenix 14(J.Johnson 6), (Hull,Chelios),4:06. ( a Slovakia,def. Aurora Michigan Eureka Aquinas Tuesday,March 30 r San Antonio 31 Parker,Ginobili,D.Brown Goalies-Columbus,Denis 24347 2& Tamarine Tanasugarn,Thailand,7-6(2),3- Cent.Michigan 6,Aquinas 5 y Chicago 20 53 .274 33/z ( Shots on goal-Colorado 11-11-5-27. shots-35 saves).Nashville,Vokoun 32-28• 6,60. Cent.Missouri 17,Missouri Southern 8 At Ted Constant Convocation Center' WESTERN CONFERENCE 5).Total fouls--Phoenix 16,San Antonio Detroit 12-9-6-27. 10(32-29). Maria Sanchez Lorenzo Norfolk,Va. Midwest Division 16.A-18,797(18,500). Power-play Opportunities-Colorado 0 of 6-4,6-2. def. Evansville 11,Illinois St.4 A-17,113(17,113).T-2:20. Saari Obata,Japan,3-6,6.4,6.2. Semifinal winners,7 p.m. W L Oct GB 4;Detroit 1 of 2. Illinois Wesleyan 4,St.Olaf 2 DENVER 83 Elena ragomi Ilse (5), Russia, def. Kansas St.6,Missouri 4 x-Minnesota 50 24 .676 - ( ) Goalies-Colorado,Salo 18-19-7(27 Dallas i 1 0 0 - 2 Ruxandra Dra omir Ilie,Romania,6-4,6-1. MIDWEST REGIONAL x-San Antonio 48 25 .658 1V/ Anthony 1420 3.4 25,Nene 2-7 33 7, shots-25 saves). Detroit, Le ace 21-9-5 g Minnesota 1- Iowa 7,5 innings,rain ) g Vancouver 1 0 1 1 - 3 Saint Louis 8.5,LAB 66 Semifinals Memphis 46 26 .639 3 Camby 1-4 2-2 4,Miller 1-15 5Fi 7,Barry 3 (27-27) First Period-1, Dallas, Morrow 25 Sunday;March 28 Dallas 44 28 .611 5 9 0-0 9,Doleac 1-4 QO 2,Boykins 4-10 4 A-20,066 19,983.T-2:23. St.Olaf 14,Wis.-Stevens Pt.11 ( ) (DiMaio, Boucher), 6:04. 2, Vancouver, TRANSACTIONS At Lloyd Noble Center Houston 41 30 .577 7'h 4 13,Andersen 1-2 0-0 2,White 67 1-2 14. S.Illinois ri 1 Bradley 2.1 D.Sedin 17(Malik),18:30. Norman,Okla. Utah 38 35 .521 11'/z Totals 29-78 18-21 83. Chicago 0 2 1 0 - 3 Second Period-3,Dallas,Tur eon 13 SE Missouri 19-6,Murray St.5-2 BASEBALL Stanford(2G6)vs.Vanderbilt(26.7),7 Denver 38 37 .507 12'h UTAH(85) St.Louts 2 1 0 i - 4 g SW Missouri -1 E.I Creighton 0.3 Kirilenko 5-12 2-5 13,Gu liotta 43 0-0 (SeThird ,1:25. American League Tenn.-Martin 8-1,E.Illinois 3-5 p.m. Pacific Division g• First Period-1,St.Louis,Mellanby 14 Third Period-4,Vancouver,Sanderson CLEVELAND INDIANS-Released RHP SOUTHWEST Tennessee(28-3)vs.Baylor(26-8),30 W L Pct GB 0,Collins 2-2 2-2 6,Arroyo 9-18 0-0 19, (Savage, Weight), 10:55. 2, St. Louis, 16(Sopel,Ohlund),9:38. Giovanni Carrara. minutes after first game x-Sacramento 51 21 .708 - Giricek 5.15 44 14,Ostertag 1-2 0-0 2,Bell Tkachuk 32(Weinrich,Demitra),16:05. DETROIT TIGERS--0 Arkansas a South Carolina 4 Overtime-1,Vancouver,Morrison 21, phoned RHP Frank Arkansas Tech 10.10,Centel Baptist 2- Championship x-L.A.l.akers 49 23 .681 2 5.11 1.1 11,Pavlovic 2.3 0-0 5,Moore 310 Second Period-3, Chicago, Keith 2 ;40 German to Toledo of the IL. Assigned gC Tuesday,March 30 Portland 37 35 .514 14 5-5 11,Lopez 2-3 0-0 4,Williams 42 0-0 0. (Beard,McCarthy).10:30(pp).4.St.Louis, g Guillermo Rodriguez and INF Warren Morris to 1 r Totals 34-81 14-17 85. Shots o- oat-Gallas 4-14-6-0-24. g Cent.Arkansas 8-10,Ouachita 2-1 At Lloyd Noble Center Seattle 34 39 .466 17 h Demitra 23(Tkachuk,Salvador),12:36.5, Vancouver 86-15-1-30. their minor league camp.Traded INF Brent Norman,Okla. Golden State 31 40 .437 19'h Denver 23 21 21 18 -83 Chicago,Ruutu 19(Berard),16:45. Power-play Opportunities-Dallas 0 of Y Cent.Oklahoma -1,,O Oklahoma 8 g ( ) Abernathy to Cleveland for cash. . Semifinal winners,9 p.m. L.A.Clippers 27 47 .365 25 Utah 22 21 26 16 - 85 Third Period-6, Chicago, Quint 4 TEXAS RANGERS-Acquired Oklahoma 1 3, ay Oklahoma 0 3-Point Goals-Denver 7-13 Barr 3.4, ( 3;Vancouver 0 ll 5. r a pl player Daryl Phoenix 25 49 .338 27 (Barry McLean,Nickulas),7:16. Clark from Milwaukee for a Oklahoma 12,Baylor S. WEST REGIONAL xclinched playoff spotAnthony2-3,White 1-1,Bo Ins 1-5),Utah Goalies-Dallas, Tugnutt 3ier (30 player to be Oral Roberts 5,S.Alabama 3 p y Anthon Yk Overtime-7, St. Louis, Salvador 3 named. Returned RHO Chris Mabeus to Semifinals Saturday's Games 3-7(Pavlovic 1-1,Arroyo 1.2,Kirilenko 1-3, (Sillin er shots-27 saves).Vancouver,Cloutier 29-21- S.Arkansas 1612,Harding 40 g ),1:50.Penalties-None. g(2422), Oakland. Saturday,March 27 Atlanta 97,Chicago 88 Bell 0-1).Fouled out-None.Rebounds- Shots on goal-Chicago 6-10.5-1-22. TORONTO BLUE JAYS-Optioned RHP Texas A&M 4,Texas Tech 1 At Bank of America Arena Cleveland 107,New Jersey 104 Denver 57 (Anthony, Miller 8), Utah 45 g g A-18,630(18,630).T-2:20. P FAR WEST St.Louis 11-11-52-29. Vinnie Chuik to Syracuse of the IL.Assigned California 11,Oregon St.5 Seattle Detroit 100,New York 85 (Kirilenko 7).Assists-Denver 17(Nene 5), Power-play Opportunities-Chicago 1 of C Paul Chiaffredo,OF Noah Hall,RHP Josue LSU 71,Texas 55 San Antonio 105,Phoenix 76 Utah 20(Arroyo 10).Total fouls--Denver 3;St.Louis 0 of 4. Chapman 1- Occidental 1 Georgia (24-9)vs. Purdue(29-3), 30 Utah 85,Denver 83 22,Utah 25.Technicals-Barr.A-19,911 1 league and LHP Dave Maurer to their minor Master's 15-8,Vanguard 3.3 g Y Goalies-Chicago,Thtbault 5-42 (29 league camp. F minutes game Portland 115,Seattle 108,OT (19,911). Osgood 28.24- PLAYER ) g shots-25 saves).St.Louis,Os S CHAMPIONSHIP National League Middle Tennessee New Mexico S[5 es after first Minnesota 98,L.A.Clippers 82 8(22-19). Saturday NEW YORK METS-T aded OF Time N.M.Highlands 5,Fort Hays St.3 Monday,March 29 Sunday's Games SEATTLE(108) A-19,912(19,260).T-2:24. At TPC at Saw ass,Stadium Course Perez to the Chicago White Sox for RHP Southern Cal l UCLA 0 At Bank of America Arena Memphis at Toronto,1 p.m. Lewis 10-19 2-3 24,Evans 42 2-4 2, Pointe Verda Beach,Fla. Matt Ginter. Stanford 3,Cal ra 5, o 1 P Potapenko 5-8 4-4 14,Barr UC Santa Barbara 5,Cornell 1 Seattle Dallas at Orlando,1:30 p.m. y 49 0.0 10, Los Angeles 1 1 0 0 - 2 Purse:$8 million ST. LOUTS CARDINALS-Assigned INF Semifinal winners,9 p.m. Houston at Milwaukee,4 p.m. Allen 13-20 0-0 32,•Booth 1-2 0-0 2, Calgary 0 2 0 1 - 3 Yardage:7,093;Par:72 Wilson Delgado, 1B Kevin Witt,OF Greg Miami at Indiana,5 p.m. Daniels 1-2 0-0 2,Radmanovic 1-6 0-0 3, First Period-1,Los Angeles;Avery 9 Third Round. Vaughn to their minor league camp. NCAA DIVISION 11 TOURNAMENT Philadelphia at Boston,6:30 p.m. R.Murray 6-12 6.6 19.Totals 41-80 14-17 (Belanger,Cowan),5:39. Adam Scott 65.72-69 - 206 BASKETBALL At A Glance Washington at Sacramento,9 p.m. - 108. Second Period-2,Calgary,Simon 17 Frank Lickliterll 69-71-68 - 208 National Basketball Association MEN Championship L.A.Clippers at Golden State,9 p.m. PORTLAND(115) (Leopold,Iginla),1:26(pp).3,Los Angeles, Kevin Sutherland 66.69-73 - 208 CLEVELAND CAVALIERS-Placed G Jefi NCAA TOURNAMENT Saturday,March 27 Utah at L.A.Lakers,9:30 p.m. Miles 4-9 2-4 10,Randolph 8-15 9-10 Cowan 10.(Avery, Gleason), 7:29. 4, Paul Stankowski 73-70.66 - 209 McInnis on the injured list. At A Glance California,Pa.75,Drury 72 25,Ratliff 6.7 6.9 18,Anderson 6.14 8-10 Calgary,Conroy 8(Iginla,Warrener),12:12. Kenny Perry 69-71-69 - 209 FOOTBALL All Times EST CHICAGO(88) 22,Stoudamire 8-20 2-2 23,Patterson 3-8 Third Period-None. Phil Mickelson 70-69-70 - 209 National Football League EAST RUTHERFORD REGIONAL NATIONAL INVITATION TOURNAMENT Johnson 2-7 0-0 4,Curry 3.10 1-2 7, 1-2 7,Abdur-Rahim 4-10 2-5 10,Gill 0-0 4 Overtime-5, Calgary, Donovan 18 Ernie Els 68-69-72 - 209 WASHINGTON REDSKINS-Matched Semifinals At A Glance A.Davis 2-5 1-1 5,J.Crawford 5.11 40 11, 0 0.Totals 39-83 30.42 115. (Conroy,Gauthier),1:06.Penalties-None. Jerry Kelly 69-66.74 - 209 New Orleans'four-year offer sheet for FB Thursday,March 25 All Times EST Hinrich 4-12 0-0 10,Chandler 0-1 42 0, Seattle 22 23 27 28 8 -108 Shots on goal-Los Angeles 10$9-2- Craig Parry 7472-64 - 210 Bryan Johnson. . At Continental Airlines Arena Quarterfinals Pargo 6-161-114,Dupree 4-4 45 12,Fizer Portland 24 24 29 23 15 -115 .,29•Calgary 7-9-7-1-24. ^Duffy Waldorf • 66.73-71 - 210 HOCKEY East Rutherford,N.J. Wednesday,March 24 6-16 3-4 15,Gill 3-7 45 10.Totals 35-89 3-Point Goals-Seattle 12.26(Allen 6- Power-play Opportunities-Los Angeles Vijay Singh 70-68-72 - 210 National Hockey League Oklahoma State 63,Pittsburgh 51 Richmond 63,Western Michigan 57 14-20 88. 8, Lewis 2-5, Barry 2-6, R.Murray 1-2, 0 of 4;Calgary 1 of 3. Woody Austin 76-69-66 - 211 NHL-Suspended Chicago F Scott Nichol Saint Joseph's 84,Wake Forest 80 1 Creighton 74,Oregon State 64 ATLANTA(97) 1 Radmanovic 1-5), Portland 7-13 Goalies-Los Angeles,Huet 10-15-10 Paul Casey 72-70.69 - 211 two games without pay for slashing Championship UNLV 78,Western Kentucky 75 Jackson 7-22 11-12 27,C.Crawford 49 (Stoudamire 5-11,Anderson 2-2).Fouled (24 shots-21 saves).Calgary,Kiprusoff 22- Bob Burns 67-72-72 - 211 Minnesota D Fllip Kuba in a March 25 game. Saturday,March 27 Thursday,March 25 2-2 11,Collier 2-9 4-4 8,Terry 8-15 6.8 26, out-None. Rebounds-Seattle 49 104(29 shots-27 saves). Padraig Harrington 68-70-73 - 211 COLORADO AVALANCHE-Recalled RW At Continental Airlines Arena Iowa State 66,Saint Joseph's 58 Sure 4-12 7-10 15,Diaw 2-4 1-2 5,N'Diaye (Potapenko 11), Portland 49 (Randolph, A-18,419(17,409).T-2:12. Tiger Woods 75-69-68 - 212 Dennis Bonvie from Hershey of the AHL. East Rutherford,N.J. Semifinals 1-11-2 3,Hansen 1-4 40 2,Bradley 0-0 4 Ratliff 9).Assists-Seattle 29(Barry 12), Fred Funk 73-71-68 - 212 Assigned F Travis Brigley to Hershey. Oklahoma State 64,Saint Joseph's 62 Saturday,March 27 0 0,Vaughn 0.0 0-0 0.Totals 29-76 32-40 Portland 24(Stoudamire 8).Total fouls- Montreal 1 1 0 0 - 2 Matt Kuchar 74-67-71 - 212 COLUMBUS BLUE JACKETS-Activated Creighton 81,Richmond 72 97. Seattle 27, Portland 14. A-18,554 Boston 0 1 1 1 - 3 Jeff Sluman 69-70-73 - 212 D Rostislav Klesla from injured reserve. ATLANTA REGIONAL Sunday,March 28 Chicago 18 20 21 . 29 - 88 (19,980). First Period-1,Montreal,Ward 4 Glen Day 71-75-67 - 213 TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING-Recalled C Eric Semifinals UNLV(25-7)at Iowa State(18-14),3'. Atlanta 15 29 27 26 - 97 (penalty shot),:26. Matt Gogel 72-71-70 - 213 Perrin from Hershey of the AHL. ( Friday,March 26 p.m. 3-Point Goals-Chicago 4-21(Hinrich 2- MINNESOTA(98) Second Period-2,Montreal,Quintal 3 Tom Pernice,Jr. 72-71-70 - 213 WASHINGTON CAPITALS-Recalled D At The Georgia Dome Championship 8, J.Crawford 1-4, Fargo 1-7, Gill 0-1, Sprewell 6.16 2-2 18,Garnett 7-14 33 (Ribeiro), 2:57. 3, Boston, Gonchar 11 Sergio Garcia 68,73-72 - 213 Jakub Cutta from Portland of the AHL. Atlanta March 34April 2 Johnson 0-1), Atlanta 7-19 (Terry 4-7, 17,Johnson 1-5 0-0 2,Hassell 44 1-2 9, (Samsonov,Knuble),11:39(pp). Cameron Beckman 70.71-72 - 213 COLLEGE Xavier 79,Texas 71 Creighton(23-9)vs.UNLV-Iowa St.win- Jackson 2-7,C.Crawford 1-3,Hansen 0-2). Cassell 7-17 1-1 15,Hoiberg 1-3 5-5 7, Third Period-4,Boston,Samsonov 13 Alex Cejka 69-71-73 - 213 KANSAS-Named Bonnie Henrickson Duke 72,Illinois 62 net Fouled out-Hinrich,Collier. Rebounds- Hudson 4-10 0-0 10,Madsen 1-2 0-0 2, (Boynton,Bergeron),1:41. women's basketball coach. Tokyo from page B1 • For now,many just want a good baseball drills go.Six aisles were filled reference to the team sponsor in the asked to respond to one question in panion,Yogi Berra,asking him to snap night of sleep. with cheerleaders wearing Yankees'and move"The Bad News Bears.' Spanish.Several of the Yankees on the the picture. "I went to sleep at 4,got up at 5:30'" Devil Rays'jerseys and hot pants,shak-' There were plenty of other shirts on dais laughed,wondering if the excel- "I thought that was priceless.It was New York shortstop Derek Jeter said. ing silver and gold pompoms. sale at the ballpark concession stands, lent interpreter-would be able to trans- absolutely priceless,"Torre said. "Then I went back to sleep for about an Players couldn't believe how polite where Yankees'merchandise dominated late the Spanish into Japanese-she In the evening,players from both hour,ate,went back to sleep for 45 everyone was. by a 4-to-1 margin.Jeter,Alex wasn't. teams attended a reception that fea- minutes." "It's unbelievable.You don't get that Rodriguez and Jason Giambi T-shirts Showing the cultural differences, tured many,along with commissioner Upon getting up for his first full day 'kind of treatment in the States,"Tampa cost$37.77.Genuine-but not au- Torre pointed out the Yankees were ap- Bud Selig,donning"happi"coats and in Japan,Jeter found out things sure Bay's Aubrey Huff said. thentic-Yankees and Devil Rays jer- plauded by the Japanese media while breaking sake barrels with baseball bats, were a whole lot different.He went to When players got to their lockers, seys were$136.82,and team jackets cost - the New York press crew sat silently. not the traditional hammers. the hotel restaurant for some sushi. they found white 3-inch patches on $186.40. General manager Brian Cashman was On Sunday morning,Torre and "It's kind of mind-boggling,.to say their shirt sleeves with the words On the scoreboard,videos were introduced as a member of the Yankees' Cashman traveled by Blackhawk heli- the least,"Jeter said."I don't know what "Ricoh"in red.Just like when the New shown of the Yankees'players saying partnership-he wishes he owned _ copter to Camp Zama along with Jorge I ate today-he said,`Special sugges- York Mets met the Chicago Cubs four "kon nichiwa(hello)"to the fans.All stock! Posada,Ruben Sierra,Gabe White and tion. ' years ago in the first Japanese season spoke Japanese phrases except Matsui, "That was just a little something ex- Joe Girardi. By mid-afternoon,players were at opener,major league baseball sold uni- whose greeting was in English. tra for the Christmas stocking;'Torre "This is one of the great events of the Tokyo Dome,which looks a bit like form ads. .Showing how international the joked. the year,"U.S.Army Maj.Gen.Nick Tropicana Field with the roof of the Mussina kept running his fingers game has become,the Yankees'news , At breakfast,a fan who wanted a Perkins said."It just makes you tingle Metrodome and nicknamed"The Big - over the patch to smooth it out. , conference include three languages- photo of himself and Torre handed his all over to stand with Joe Torre in the Egg."The workout was boisterous as "Chico's Bail Bonds?"he suggested,a Rodriguez and Mariano Rivera were camera to the manager's dining com- pinstripes." B4 BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, March 28, 2004 There's no place I'Ike home for Connecticut Huskies hold Gauchos to 32 Irish(21-11)with 22 points and 12 rebounds.Her layup with 1:50 left tied the game at 49. percent shooting, move on to Mazzante hit the go-ahead basket on the next battle Penn State Monday = possession and got right back on defer se.She leaped high to steal a pass intended for Batteast with 35 seconds left,and Perm State was in control the rest of the way.Tanisha Wright made a key of- By The Associated Press fensive rebound and the Lady Lions made shot 4- for-6 from the line to seal the win. HARTFORD,Conn.—Having Diana Taurasi The Irish,who at one point this season had a g p record of 7-6,missed a pair of 3-poinL-rs in the isn't the onlythin that separates Connecticut from just about every other team. closing seconds. The Huskies'defense is downright nasty and The Lady Lions got a scare early in the second that's what saved them from a stunning upset on half when center Reicina Russell went down with a Saturday. knee injury and had to be helped from the court. Connecticut needed every stop it could muster, The 6-foot-6 freshman returned about four min- plus some clutch shooting from Taurasi,to beat F s. utes later to an ovation and finished with 10 re- feisty UC Santa Barbara 63-55 and advance to the bounds and two blocks. East Regional final against top-seeded Penn State „ Mazzante,who shot 6-for-16,also grabbed on Monday night. I" eight rebounds.She opened the game by taking "I thought both teams were tremendous on de- the ball away from a driving Le'Tania Severe and fense,UConn coach Geno Auriemma said."That 0 made an easy layup.Her second pick came after a was as hard as anybody has played against us and - bucket by Brungo,when she stole the inbounds as well.And I thought we were just as good.That's pass for another easy layup. probably why we're both here.Teams that don't "I just decided to stick around and see if I play good defense are not playing at this point" could get one of those easy ones,"Mazzante said. Second-seeded Connecticut(28-4),seeking its � '- "Batteast threw it right to me.I was just in the fourth national championship in five years,held right place,' UCSB to 32 percent shooting and frustrated r,._ Portland said Mazzante began calling for the Lindsay Taylor,the Gauchos'6-foot-8 center. = ball late in the game,something the All-American That enabled the Huskies to survive 17 senior rarely does. turnovers and their own 39.6 percent shooting. - "That's something that she's maybe done Taurasi led UConn with 21 points and became - twice"Portland said."The last time I didn't listen the school's career leader in assists.Barbara Turner to her was in the Big 10 tournament.I thought she added 13 points,while Jessica Moore had 10 was in a nice flow.You could just tell t-zings were points and 10 rebounds and led the defensive ef- special for her." fort against Taylor. AP Connecticut's Jessica Moore(31)fads over UC Santa Barbara's April McDivitt during the second LSU 71, Texas 55 "That was the key the game,the fact that we half of their NCAA East Regional semifinal in Hartford,Conn.,on Saturday. SEATTLE—The way Seimone Augustus was were able to contain her on the inside;"Turner shooting,the LSU mascot could have been on the said."Because that forced them to make a lot of a couple of inbounds passes in,knock down the top-seeded Lady Lions to a 55-49 wn over bench to coach the Lady Tigers. plays on the outside." (shots)and the rest will;takke care o=itself." Notre Dame in the East Regional se;rnifrial. t Augustus scored 29 points on 14-of 19 shoot- UConn kept bodies on Taylor throughout the McDivitt's line-drive 3-pointer from the top of Mazzante finished with 17 point3 and a team- ing,and Tameka Johnson added 12 points and 13 game and forced her into tough shots.She man- the key pulled UCSB to 45-39 with 7:28 to;clay, high three steals—one to open the game,one that assists,leading fourth-seeded LSU to a 71-55 win aged just five points on 2-for-11 shooting. plenty of time to keep Tacking away at he lead. led to an easy basket and one that helped seal the over top-seeded Texas on Saturday night in the "They defended me the same way all the other But Taurasi hit a baseline jumper,men nailed a win. West regional semifinals. teams have.I'm used to that,"Taylor said."I got turnaround shot to putter_Huskies tack up by 10. "We needed a defensive stop.W6 didn't do that The Lady Tigers(25-7)advanced 0 meet the the ball in the post where I wanted it.I just didn't Taylor's basket inside cut the lead:0 51-44,and for 38 minutes,Penn State coach Rene Portland winner of the late game between Purdue and make the most of my shots.I don't think they did the Gauchos had a stance-to draw ever_closer af- said."We did that for the last two n nit-zes and=t Georgia. anything special to defend me.It was all my fault." ter Moore missed the front end of a one-ar-d-one. made tie difference." LSU looked great in the hands of acting coach April McDivitt,who played her first three sea- But Taurasi stole the ball from McDivitt to end The Lady Lions(28-5)and Mazzant_struggled Dana"Pokey'Chatman,who has filled in over the sons at Tennessee,led Santa Barbara with 20 that threat,then came around a screw and hit a offensively against Notre Dame's stubborn zone past two months while Basketball Hall of Fame points and kept the 1 nth-seeded Gauchos(27-7) fadeaway from 17 feet to make it 53-44 wits 1:18 but made the big shots and big plays when they member Sue Gunter battled acute bronchitis. threatening until the final minute. remaining. needed it most. Texas(30-5)won last year's meeting 78-60 to Kristen Mann scored 12 for UCSB,which made "We defended that just textbook and she faded Jessica Brungo led Penn State with 2D point;in reach the Final Four,and it was sweet for the Lady 11 steals but simply couldn't hit the shots it need- and just drained it,"UCSE coach Mark French a game in which neither team led by more thar_six Tigers to take the rematch in such lopsided fashion. ed to pull ahead in the second half. said."That's what good players do.' points. This wasn't the kind of Texas two-step that Taurasi,on the other hand,did make those Penn State 55 Notre Dame 49 "We didn't attack(the zone)enough and they Longhorns fans wanted to see.The loss came one shots,coming through to keep the Gauchos at bay kept pushing us back further and further past the night after Texas lost 79-71 to Xavier at the same down the stretch.She also had five rebounds and HARTFORD,Conn,—Penn State relied on 3-point;Mazzante said."I think we made som` point in the men's tournament. her f6tir assists gave her 640,breaking Je ufer Kelly Mazzante's offense throughout season. adjus s at halftime and we started going is stus was fabulous in the first 20 minutes, Rizzotti's record of 637. On Saturday,the Lady Liens neede efense, the r�ection:' hit -of-8 from the floor to help LSU to a 37- "It's been a long season and we've be, that too. Penn to will play second-seeded Connecticut 24 h tme lead.She made shots from everywhere situation a couple of times,"Taurasi said."After Mazzante hit a floating,jumper w-&l 46 seconds on Monday for a berth in the Final Four. —underneath the basket,jumpers from the top of you're in it,you don't start to panic.We had to get left and made a key steal down the stretch to lead Jacoueline Batteast led the fifth-seeded Fighting the key and a few fast-break layups. Le . Tech "' � p e_ �­hii`s' to r is BPylor coach lookPto Su" Mm, itt • for advice,.and now for a bigwin on its side again'st Duke NORMAN,Okla.(AP)— `She's my kind of coach. A lot of what NORFOLK,Va.(AP)— State.Both games were in women's game. Kim Mulvey-Robertson remem- bers iow Pat Summitt stood bo ' Duke brings impressive creden- December. =vcw,Bndke is cotytinLing it. was earn m Pat ummitt. ... .She S tials into the Mideast Regional. Now,the Lady Techsters are Louis ana Tech and Tennessee her when she was a player and Louisiana Tech has some im- ready to give their all against are th`only scho ila to have comforted her when she was everything I aspire to be as a coach." pressive ones,too. All-American Alana Beard and slaved:n all 23 NCAA tourna- about to become a mother. The Lady Techsters have won the Blue Devils,and to add to _nents.Tech ended zwo of them Ifs w7y Mulkey-Robertson - Baylor coach Kim Mulkey-Robertson, two national titles,and they are the program's tradition. as national cham.Fiors,in 1982 has nothing but admiration for one of two teams to make the "I wanted to go to a school and 1988. the legendary Tennessee coach `Absolutely not,you made this pearance in the round of 16. NCAA tournament all 23 years, where I could possibly win a Budkr's record in-wo years she'l:face Sunday in the NCAA team and you will be ready;" Tennessee(28-3)is there for the while the Blue Devils are still national championship,"said is 60-5,and he's coaching in his Midwest Regional semifinals. Mulkey-Robertson said."It 23rd consecutive time. looking for their first national guard Erica Smith-Taylor,who sec• nil straight round of 16. "1 just love Pat Summitt," took me three weeks and I was "Our fans are excited,they championship. averaged 29.5 points in victories La_t year's team L-st E•9-63 to said Mulkey-Robertson,coach back to full speed." are excited just to be in the of fourth-seeded Baylor."She'- Summitt said making a ros- Sweet 16,"Mulkey-Robertson The two meet Sunday fora against Montana and Texas Louisiana State. my bind of coach.A lot of what ter dian€e was never a serious said."Her fans would probably berth in the regional final. Tech in the first two rounds. He',,also coaching against a , I do was learned from Pat c-)nsideration. be disappointed if they didn't Louisiana Tech has won 21 That was first on my list.I one-tire`target of:nns program. , „ straight,the longest streak in the wanted to win,I didn't want to Be�_d grew up in Summitt.She's hard-nosed,site's "'Her leadership,her mental make it to the Sweet 16. a mother,she's married.She toughness,her attitude—she's In the other regional semifi- country,and top-seeded Duke go to a school where I could av- Shreure»rt,La.,Lbourt 60 miles ,> (29-3)has won 12 in a row. erage 30 points a game and lose." from Ruston,and.said takes her career and passion fcr a great competitor, Summitt nal,second-seeded Vanderbilt Nonetheless,the Lady Techsters Trina Frierson,whose 16- Lo-uiEia.a Tech wa:"in the pic- the game seriously,and at the said."1 felt like she would bring will be making its 1 nth appear- (29-2)got a seventh seed. point scoring average is second tune"when she was being re- same time she loves her family. something to our Olympic team ante in the round of 16 and "When you get to the Sweet to fellow frontcourt player cruiteL Her desi:e to get away "she's everything I aspire to that obviously was contagious." No.6 seed Stanford(26-6)its 16,you're going to play some- Amisha Carter(17.2)on the sea- helped L-ad her tz Duke. be as a coach." The team went on to win the 13th. body great anyway,"second- son,said her pull to go to the There,she has von three 1�.Iutlkey-Robertson played on @old medal. The Commodores(26-7) ar year Louisiana Tech coach Kurt school in Ruston,La.,(pop. Atlartic Coast C -ference play- the-984 Olympic team Sumrritt nears later when Mulkey- will need to find a way to slow Budke said of the matchup with 25,000)was the same. er of the year awards and led coached.Summitt endeared her- Robertsc n was pregnant with down All-American Nicole Duke."It might as well be the "I wanted to become a part the Blue Devils to the Final self to the young player six weeks her-first hild,Makenzie,and Powell,who's averaging 20 best team in the nation." of the tradition,she said. Four the last two y_a_s. before the Olympics started, concerned about how her career points per game tiis season. The other game pits third- So did Budke,even though This season,Beard averaged when Mulkey-Robertson frac- would be affected,Summitt was "She'll post up guards if you seeded Boston College(27-8) others weren't sold on the idea. 20.1 points and became the first tured her foot. Here again. put a guard against her.She'll and coach Cathy Inglese against Budke replaced Louisiana wamaiat Duke to have her "l woke up one morning and "I just talked to her as a take you outside if you put a seventh-seeded Minnesota(23- Tech icon Leon Barmore as nunttoer retired, oining]l couldn't walk,Mulkey- room,"Summitt said. post(player)on her,"Vanderbilt 8)and coach Pam Borton,a coach before last season.He men's kxseys in the rafters. Robertson said."Tile doctors The young Louisiana Tech coach Melanie Balcomb."She former assistant to Inglese at laughs now when he recalls Dak?coach Gad said stag off of it for three to assistant coach never forgot. presents a very tough matchup Vermont and later with the telling friends he was leaving a Goesterkors said experience four weeks." As they cross paths again, for whatever you decide to do Eagles. Texas community college to be- seems to be helping her team so Summitt refuses to pick an Mulkey�tobertson's Bears(26- against her." Louisiana Tech,the Western come Barmore's top aide four far.T)v--Blue Devik lost in the alternate. E)will be looking for the Balcomb said the Athletic Conference champion, years ago. national semifinals in ea:h of "I'll never forget when I had biggest win in school history. Commodores would guard the has already played two of the "People called me stupid and the Iz st two year,giving,Beard my meeting with her.She said Baylor is making its first ap- 6-foot-2 forward by committee. other top NCAA seeds this sea- called me crazy for following and felow seniors Ic:ss Tillis son,losing 85-65 at Tennessee Leon,"he said,because Barmore and Vicki Krapohl.one last and winning 87-84 at Penn had built a dynasty in the charice o win a national title. Only 2 Weeks left to SAVE $1y000E1 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Offer ft ra March 3 ly 2004 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITjc C JMMISSION on Monday, - April 12,2004 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room,Gty Hall,411 East 18 Hole Championship Course New White Sand Bunkers Main Street;Bozeman,Montana. Driving Range/Practice facilities Pro Shop-Full Service/Lessons The purpose of the public hearing is to consider a modification to the approv--d Gallatin Center Subdivision Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development,requested by f-ie applicant/owner;Gallatin Center Full Service Restaurant&Bar-Best Patio in Town nth Spectacular Views LP,5550 LBJ Freeway,Suite 380,Dallas,TX 75240,and represented by Allied Engineer erg,32 Discovery Leagues�Men'S Ladles Couples) Junior Golf Programs Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718. Said application would increase the number.of allbwable entryway pylon signs. r The property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision,City of Bozeman,Montana. The property Fun&Friendly M,-rakers Reasonable Dues is zoned`B-2"(Community Business District)and`BP"(Business Park District)and is g2nt�rally located west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. - - - - Written and verbal testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments m-zy be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Departmert, P.O. Box 1231G, Boz man, MT -- 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this applicatioi may be reviewed in the Planning and 1 Community Development Department,20 East Olive Street,zervan A Fc•r those who r 82-23accommo- �� ` �� � CALL I oUA► 587-9751 t- lotions for disabilities,please contact Ron Brey,City of Bozerran ADA Coordinatcr, 582-2306(voice), Y' 1 1 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modifwation. ! BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, March 28, 2004 B; � SCOREBOARD Championship Szczerbiak 5.9 40 11,Olowokandi 35 1-1 Overtime-5, Boston, Samsonov 14 LPGA NABISCO CHAMPIONSHIP COLLEGEBASEBALL Sunday,March 28 7.Totals 39$5 1314 98.,. ;` C (SlegO,4:32.Penalties—None. Saturday i At The Georgia Dome T {®R D O _GJD ��E L.A.CLIPPERS(82) Shots on goal—Montreal 10-8-4-0-22. At Mission Hills Country Club,Dinah SATURDAY'S SCORES Atlanta ,, •, .�>;a;.:,k.- - Barnes 14 0-0 2,Brand 7.16 8-11 22, Boston 12-11-11-5-39. Shore Tournament Course 'Bentley 41,Mass.-Lowell 04 Xavier(26-10)vs. Duke(30.5), 5:05 Subject t0 change Kaman 7-13 5-7 19,Maggette 5-13 5.617, Power-play Opportunities—Montreal 0 of Rancho Mirage,Calif. P.m. 1 g House 39 0-0 7,Ely 3-5 1-2 7,Simmons 1- 3;Boston 1 of 4. P.prse:$1.6 million •Bucknell 2.5,Navy 1-1 SUNDAY,MARCH 28 11:30 a.m. (ABC) 5 2-2 4,Drobnjak 0-0 0-0 0,Cooling 0-14 Goalies—Montreal,Theodore 32.26-5 Yardage:6,520;Par:72 :California,Pa.5.6,Indiana,Pa.42 ST.LOUIS REGIONAL Auto recto Philadelphia at Boston, 0 0,Overtop 2-3 0-0 4.Totals 29-69 21-28 (39 shots-36 saves).Boston,Raycroft 28- Third Round g p ,%Canisius 5.0,St.Peter's 1-2 Semifinals 82. 17-8(22-20). .a•amateur i !rDeSales 4-2,Kings,Pa.,3-3. Friday,March 26 NASCAR,Nextel Cup, 4:30 p.m. (ESPN) Minnesota 26 26 27 19 — 98 A-17,565(17,565).T-2:27. Grace Park 72-69.67 — 208 Duquesne 4-3,Rhode Island 7.2 At Edward Jones Dome L.A.Clippersi6 26 21 19 — 82 Aree Song 66-73-69 — 208 'Eastern 2.12,Neumann 0.11 St.Louis Food City 500,11 a.m. Pro hockey 3-Point Goals—Minnesota 7-17 Ottawa 1 1 0 0 — 2 Jung YeonLee 69-69-71 — 209 Farmingdale 2-1,Old Westbury 43 Kansas 100,Alabama-Birmingham 74 (FOX) St. Louis at Chicago or (Sprewell 4-8,Hudson 2-3,Szczerbiak 1- Toronto 0 1 1 0 — 2 a-Michelle Wie 69-72-69 — 210 Fordham 6-5,Dayton 4-3,2nd game,11 Georgia Tech 72,Nevada 67 Golf Anaheim at Minnesota,2 3,Hoiberg 0-1,Cassell 0-2).L.A.Clippers First Period-1,Ottawa, Ray i (Neil, Kerrie Webb 68-71-71 — 210 innings Championship 3-5(Maggette 2-3, House 1-2). Fouled Vermette),8:33. Stacy Prammanasudh 71-71.69 — 211 Franklin Pierce 7.9, American Sunday,March 28 PGA Tour,The Players p.m.(ESPN) out—Madsen.Rebounds—Minnesota 48 Second Period-2,Toronto,Francis 12 Rosie Jones 67.73-71 — 211 International 41 At Edward Jones Dome Championship final Tennis (Garnett 15),L.A. Clippers 46(Kaman (Johansson,Leetch),2:17(pp).3,Ottawa„ Wendy Doolan 70-69-72 — 211 , Geneva 14-12,Walsh 5.2 St.Louis 12).Assists—Minnesota 24(Garnett 5), Phillips 5(Havlat,Bonk),16:20. Catriona Matthew 67.75-70 — 212 George Washington 4-1,Massachusetts Kansas(24-8)vs.Georgia Tech(26.9), round, 11:30 a.m.(NBC) ATP-WTA Tour,NASDAQ- L.A. Clippers 15 (Simmons 4). Total Third Period-4,Toronto,McCabe 16 Mi-Hyun Kim 71-70-71 — 212 12 2:40 p.m. ear LPGA, Kraft Nabisco 100 Open,early round, fouls—Minnesota 25,L.A.Clippers 16. (Francis,Kilger),9:26 Penalties—None. ' Dottie Pepper 68,70.74 — 212 Gordon 4-9,New England Coll.36 p Technicals—Minnesota Defensive Three Overtime—None. Young Kim • 74-72.67 — 213 John Jay 7-20,Lehman 3-2 PHOENIX REGIONAL Championship,final noon(ESPN) Second,L.A.Clippers coach Dunleavy 2, Shots on goal—Ottawa 9-5-12-4-30. Cristie Kerr 71.71-71 — 213 Johns Hopkins 4-4,Ursinus 3-3 Semifinals + Maggette 2.Ejected—L.A.Clippers coach Toronto 8-11-33-25. Juniata 8,Elizabethtown 7 Thursday,March 25 round,2 p.m. (ABC) Women s college hoops Karin Koch 7472-68 — 213 Men's college basketball NCAA tournament, (18,964).Dunleavy, Maggette. A-19,424 Power-play opportunities—Ottawa 0 of Karen na Ki es 72-72-70 — 214 Lafayette 124,Holy Cross 2.5 At America West Arena g (18,964). 2;Toronto 1 of 2. Christina Kim 72-72-70 — 214 Lehigh 10-8,Army 3.9 Phoenix NCAA tournament, re- Mideast Regional semifi- Goalies—Ottawa, Lalime (2 shots-2 Hee-Won Han 72-71.71 — 214 Mercyhurst 7,Wayne St.5 Connecticut 73,Vanderbilt 53 lanai finals,doublehead- nal,Louisiana Tech VS. saves),Prusek 14-5.3(6:18 First,23 shots- Candie Kung 69-75-71 — 215 1• Montclair St.6,RPI 0 Alabama 80,Syracuse 71 g I 1 21 saves).Toronto, Belfour 31.19-6(30 Annika Sorenstam 71-76.69 — 216 N.J.Tech 4-1,Teikyo-Post 1-6 Championship er, Kansas vs. Georgia Duke,10 a.m.(ESPN); shots-28 saves). Michele Redman 73-73-70 — 216 Niagara 9.2,Manhattan 2-1 Saturday,March 27 NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE A-19,480(18,819).T—NA. Wendy Ward 72-74-70 — 216 Notre Dame 5-4,West Virginia 3.0 At America West Arena Tech, 12:40 p.m.; Xavier Minnesota vs. Boston At A Glance Pat Pat Hurst 72-76.69 — 217 Penn 5-9,Columbia 3-19 Phoenix, vs. Duke,3:05 p.m. College,noon;Stanford All Times EST Carolina 2 1 0 — 3 JeengJang 76.71-70 — 217 Quinnipiac 1,Mount St.Mary's,Md.0 Connecticut 87,Alabama 71 EASTERN CONFERENCE N.Y.Islanders 0 1 1 — 2 Rachel Teske 75.71-71 — 217 St.Anselm 32,Stonehill 1.3 (CBS) vs. p CBS Vanderbilt,5 .m.; Atlantic Division First Period-1, Carolina, Rourke 1 Brendle Burton 7476-71 — 217 St.John Fisher 7-10,Hilbert 2.4 FINAL FOUR Pro basketball Baylor vs.Tennessee,7 W L TOL Pis GF GA (Brind'Amour,Vrbata),8:42.2,Carolina,Hill Se RiPak 72-73-72 — 217 St.John's 9-1,Georgetown 2.4 At The Alamodome x-Philadelphia 39 20 14 6 98223 180 13(Steal,Vasicek),17:57. Donna Andrews 70-74-73 — 217 Temple 10-4,La Salle 5-1 Dallas at Orlando, p.m.(ESPN2) x-New Jersey 40 24 12 2 94199 157 San Antonio Second Period N.Y. Islanders, Lorene Ochoa 67-76-74 — 217 Wagner 5-1,Fairleigh Dickinson 14 Semifinals N.Y.Islanders 36 28 10 4 86221 199 Kvasha 15(Jonnson),5:16.4,Carolina, W.New England 2.3.Atbertus Magnus Saturday,April 3 N.Y.Rangers 26 38 7 8 67200 239 Svoboda 2(Wallin,Hedican),8:31. 42 Oklahoma State(31-3)vs. St. Louis Chicago 55 (Johnson 8), Atlanta 60 Pittsburgh 21 46 8 4 54181 294 Third Period-5,N.Y.Islanders,Parrish SOUTH- champion,TBA COLLEGE1 (Jackson 10).Assists—Chicago 17(Pargo Northeast Division 21(Czerkawski,Ronning),11:30(pp). Alabama 2,Mississippi 1 Atlanta champion vs.Connecticut(31- 6), Atlanta 19 (Terry 6). Total fouls— W L TOL Pts GF GA Shots on goal—Carolina 9-9-6-24.N.Y. NASDAQ-100 OPEN Anderson,S.C.9.5,Pfeiffer 6.7 6),TBA MEN Chicago 26,Atlanta 24.Technicals—Fizer, x-Boston 39 18 14 7 99198 177 Islanders 12.9-17-38. Saturday Barry 7-1.Tampa 3.3 Championship NCAA DIVISION 1 TOURNAMENT Atlanta Defensive Three Second.Flagrant x-TdrentO 42 24 10 3 97 230 202 Power-play Opportunities—Carolina 0 of At Tennis Center at Crandon Park Berry 6.1,Cumberland 4-16 Monday,April 5 At A Glance fouls—Bradley.A-12,466(19,445). x-Ottawa 40 22 10.6 96249 174 4;N.Y.Islanders i of 8. Key Biscayne,Fla. Birmingham-Southern 8, Coastal Semifinal winners All Times EST x-Montreal 40 28 7 4 91201 182 Goalies—Carolina, Weekes 23-28-10 Purse:Men,$3.45 million(Masters); Carolina 3 EAST REGIONAL NEW YORK(85) Buffalo 35 32 7 4 81207 210 (38 shots-36 saves). N.Y. Islanders, Women:$3.06 million(Tier 1) Campbell 10-2,Troy St.6.4 NCAA DIVISION 11 TOURNAMENT At Pepsi Arena Anderson 4-11 3-4 12,K.Thomas 1$2- Southeast Division DiPietro 21-17-5(24-21). Surface:Hard-Outdoor -Catawba 13-13,Newberry 6.1 At A Glance Albany,N.Y. 2 4,Mohammed 6$1-5 13,Johnson 5.12 W L TOL Pts GF GA A-16,234(16,234).T-2:20. Singles Charleston Southern 9,Liberty 8 Regionals Championship 5-5 17,Marbury 5-14 2-2 12,Baker 5$5- yTampa Bay 45 21 8 5103236 182 Men Clemson 7,Wake Forest 4 Championship Saturday,March 27 6 16,Norris 2-7 1-1 5,Sweetney 1-4 2.2 4, Atlanta 32 35 8 4 76208 235 Buffalo 2 0 0 0 — 2 Second Round Coll.of Charleston 14,Appalachian St. Saturday,March 27 Maine 2.Wisconsin 1,OT Harrington 43 2.4 2.Totals 29-75 23-31 Carolina 28 31 13 6 75159 191 Pittsburgh 0 2 0 0 — 2 Todd Reid,Australia,clef.Martin Verkerl 10, Kennesaw 27 33 14 4 72172 205 Kennesaw State 84,Southern Indiana 85• Firs[ Period-1, Buffalo, Drury 18 (15),Netherlands,4.6,64,7-5. Delta St.9,Henderson St.6 59 WEST REGIONAL DETROIT(100) Washington 22 45 9 2 55174 241 (McKee), 13:53. 2, Buffalo, Dumont 21 Dominik Hrbaty (27), Slovakia, def East Carolina 7,Memphis 1 At World Arena Prince 8.11 2-2 20,Okur 3.6 1-2 7, WESTERN CONFERENCE (Drury,Briere),17:36(pp). Bohdan Uiihrach,Czech Republic,6-3,36 Elizabeth City St.6,Virginia St.5 NAIA DIVISION I TOURNAMENT Colorado Springs,Coto. B.Wallace 6-14 42 12,R.Hamilton 6-13 5• Central Division Second Period-3,Pittsburgh,Fata 16 6.3• Elan 11,ETSU 10 At A Glance Championship 5 18,Billups 4-11 33 11,Campbell 4$5- W L TOL Pis GF GA (Kraft, Strbak), 7:22(pp). 4,Pittsburgh, Tommy Robredo(19),Spain,def.Olivie Emory 10,Palm Beach Atlantic 6 All Times EST I Saturday,March 27 5 13,James 1-4 0-0 2,Williamson 5$33 y-Detroit 45 20 11 2103243 178 Koltsov 9(Kostopoulos,Kraft),15:28. Rochus,Belgium,4-6,6.1,7.6(3). Erskine 3.7,Mount Olive 2.14 At Kansas City,Mo. Denver 1,North Dakota 0 13,Ham 0-0 42 0,Hunter 1.2 2-2 4,Milicic St.Louis 36 28 31 2 85181 190 Third Period—None. Radek Stepanek,Czech Republic,def Ferrum 15,Greensboro 12 Quarterfinals 0-5 0-0 0.Totals 38.82 21-26 100. Nashville 35 28 11 4 85205 209 Overtime—None. Penalties—Dumont, Fernando Verdasco,Spain,7.6(6),7-6(3) Florida 17,Kentucky 6 Saturday,March 27 NORTHEAST REGIONAL New York 21 28 18 18— 85 Columbus 24 42 8 4 60169 224 Buf(holding),2:58. Vince Spadea,United States,def.Mara Florida A&M 8.21,Coppin St.2-9 Mountain State,W.Va. 87,Oklahoma At Verizon Wireless Arena Detroit 32 35 23 10 —100 Chicago 20 39 11 7 58181 241 Shots on goal—Buffalo 13-1432-28. Safin(31),Russia,7$(7),6-7(4),6.4. Florida Atlantic 7,Jacksonville 3 Manchester,N.H. Northwest Division Baptist 84 3-Point Goals—New York 414(Johnson Pittsburgh 12.9-13-5-39 Augustin Called (20), Argentine, def Fla.International 2,Ark.-Little Rock 1 Concordia,Calif.61,Lindsey Wilson,Ky. Semifinals 2-5,Baker 1-1,Anderson 1-3,Norris 0-2, W L TOL Pts GF GA Power-play Opportunities—Buffalo 1 of Lars Burgsmuller,Germany,6-3,7-5. Florida Southern 3-3,Florida Gulf Coast 58 Saturday,March 27 Marbury 0-3), Detroit 3-9 (Prince 2-3, x-Colorado 38 22 13 5 94225 188 4;Pittsburgh 1 of 3. Radek Stepanek,Czech Republic,def 2-5 Mobile,Ala.75,Oklahoma City 62 Boston College 5,Niagara 2 R.Hamilton 1-1,B.Wallace 0-1,Billups 04). Vancouver 39 24 10 5 93218 189 Goalies—Buffalo, Biron 24-17-5 (39 Fernando Verdasco,Spain,7.6(6).7-6(3), Florida St.10,North Carolina 6 Georgetown,Ky.64,Barber-Scotia,N.C. Michigan 4,New Hampshire i Fouled out—Baker.Rebounds—New York Calgary 40 29 7 3 90195 172 shots-37 saves).Pittsburgh,Caron 8-24-5 Jiri Novak(14),Czech Republic,def, Georgia College 6-5,N.C.-Pembroke 1-4 60 Championship 53(Mohammed 12),Detroit 50(B.Wallace Edmonton 34 27 12 5 85212 199 (28.26). Stefan Koubek,Austria,6.4,6.0. Georgia Southern 8,Georgia Tech 7 Semifinals Sunday,March 28 12). Assists—New York 16 (Anderson, Minnesota 26 28 20 3 75171 171 A-12,964(16,958).T-2:29. • Thierry Ascione,France,def.Feliciano Georgia St.2,Lipscomb 1 Monday,March 29 Boston College(28.8.4)vs. Michigan Norris,Marbury 4),Detroit 28(Billups 13). Pacific Division Lopez(23),Spain,7-6(4).64. Hawaii 8,Louisiana Tech 1 Mountain State, W.%a. (36-1) vs. (27,13-2),4 p.m. Total fouls—New York 27, Detroit 22. W L TOL Pts GF GA Washington 0 0 1 — 1 Paradorn Srichaphan(9),Thailand,def. Huntingdon 15-0,Fisk 21-0 Georgetown,Ky.(30-7),7 p.m. Technicals—New York Defensive Three x-San Jose 40 20 12 6 98209 175 Tampa Bay 1 2 1 — 4 Ricardo Mello,Brazil,6-1,1-6,6.3. Jackson St.8.12,Alcorn St.7.9 Concordia,Calif.(32-4)vs.Mobile,Ala., MIDWEST REGIONAL Second,Detroit Defensive Three Second. x-Dallas 40 24 13 1 94185 164 First Period-1,Tampa Bay,Lecavalier Jonas Bjorkman (26), Sweden, def, Jacksonville St.7.4,Samford 3.0 (29-9) 9 p.m. At Van Andel Arena A-22,076(22,076). Los Angeles 28 26 16 8 80199 205 31(Taylor,Sarich),9:15. Taylor Dent,United States,7-6(4).6-2. James Madison 13,N.C.-Wilmington 12 Grand Rapids,Mich. Anaheim 28 33 10 8 74180 208 Second Period-2, Tampa Bay, Fernando Gonzalez (21), Chile, def. Lee,Tenn.6.9,Martin 45 NATIONAL INVITATION TOURNAMENT Semifinals NEW JERSEY(104) Phoenix 21 33 18 6 66183 233 Lecavalier 32(Boyle,Lukowich),2:25.3, Karol Kucera,Slovakia,7-5,7-6(7). LeTourneau 5.3,Louisiana College 3-10 . At A Glance Saturday,March 27 Rogers 49 42 10,Jefferson 12-20 9- Two points for a win,one point for a tie Tampa Bay,Modin 28(Stillman,Richards), Sebastian Grosjean(12),France,def. Limestone 9-5,Belmont Abbey 8-4 All Times EST Minnesota 5,Notre Dame 2 11 35,Collins 4-8 0-0 8,Kitties 9-22 2.2 and Overtime loss. 17:43. Nicolas Lapentti,Ecuador,6-3,64. Louisiana-Lafayette 4,W.Kentucky 3 Minnesota Duluth 5,Michigan State 0 24,Harris 8-13 1.2 19,A.Williams 1-3 0-0 xclinched playoff spot Third Period-4,Washington,Pettin er And Roddick 2,United States,def. Quarterfinals g g Y ( ) Louisiana-Monroe 6,Texas-Arlington 5, Wednesday,March 24 Championship 2,Armstrong 42 40 0,Scalabrine 2-5 2-2 yclinched division 7 (Tvrdon, Cutta), 7:03. 5, Tampa Bay, Karol Beck,Slovakia.6-2,64. 30 innings Sunday,March 28 6,Goldwire 41 40 0.Totals 40-83 14-19 Saturday's Games Richards 25 Rutgers 72,Villanova 60 (Stillman, Boyle), 10:02. Carlos Moya (5), Spain, clef. David LSU 11,Mississippi St.6 Minnesota (27-13-3) vs. Minnesota 104. Detroit 2,Colorado 0 Penalt— Lynchburg 12-27,Emory&Henry 6.5 Michigan ur Hawaii March Duluth(27-12-4),1 p.m. N.Y.Rangers 3,Philadelphia i Y Verot, Was (crosschecking), Sanchez,Spain,4-6, ), wit Thursday Marcfi 25 CLEVELAND(107) g 16:36. Roger Federer (1), Switzerland, clef. Miami 6.1,Penn St.1-0 Oregon 65,Notre Dame 61 E.Williams 4-8 0-0 8,Boozer 8-15 5-6 St.Louis 4,Chicago 3,OT Shots on goal—Washington 8-4-10— Nikolay Davydenko,Russia,6.2,3-6.7-5. Milligan 5-8,Coker 4-3 WOMEN Calgary 3,Los Angeles 2,OT 22.Tampa Bay 8-1311-32. Xavier Malisse, Belgium, def. Albert Iowa State 77,Marquette 69 21,Ilgauskas 7-12 35 17,011ie 42 0-0 0, Millsaps 4-13,Southwestern,Texas 2-8 Semifinals FROZEN FOUR GLANCE James 15-29 10-10 41,K.Brown 5.5 1.3 Boston 3,Montreal 2,OT Power-play Opportunities—Washington Costa(22),64,6-2. Mississippi College 7.5,Texas-Tyler 6.4 Tuesday,March 30 All Times EST 12,Newble 1-1 0.0 2,Battle 1-2 0-0 2, Ottawa 2,Toronto 2,tie 0 of 1;Tampa Bay 0 of 5. Guillermo Canas,Argentina,def.Sjeng New Orleans 9,Arkansas St.8 At Dunkin Donuts Center Carolina 3,N.Y.Islanders 2 At Madison Square Garden Nation 2$0-0 4.Totals 43$019.24 107. Goalies—Washington,Yeats 42-0(32 Schalken(13),Nethenantls,61,3-0,default, North Alabama 3-1,West Florida 1-2 New York Providence,R.I. New Jersey 28 24 26 26 —104 Buffalo 2,Pittsburgh 2,tie shots-28 saves).Tampa Bay,Khabibulin 28- Andre Agassi(4),United States,def, N.C.-Asheville 10,Radford 3 Friday,March 26 Cleveland 24 20 31 32 —107 Atlanta 3,Florida 0 17.7(22-21). Mariano Zabaleta,Italy,6-0,7-6(1). Rutgers(1912)vs.lov a State(2412), X N.C.Stale 12,Virginia 1 Semifinals Tampa Bay 4,Washington 1 A-18,812(19,758).T—NA. Women 7 p.m. 3-Point Goals—New Jersey 10-18North Florida 8-3,Francis Marion 45 Minnesota 5,Dartmouth 1 Columbus 3,Nashville 2,OT Oregon(18-12)vs.Michigan(21.11),9 (Kitties 4.9, Jefferson 2-2, Harris 2-3, Second Round North Georgia 11-2.Brewton Parker 1-3 p.m. Harvard 2,St.Lawrence 1 Rogers 2.3,Goldwire 0-1),Cleveland 2-3 Vancouver 3,Dallas 2,OT Atlanta i i 1 — 3 Alicia Malik(24),Australia,def. Amy Northwestern St.4,Lamar 3 Championship Sunday,March 28 (K.Brown 1.1,James 1-2). Fouled out— Sunday's Games Florida 0 0 0 — 0 Frazier,United States,4.6,7.5,6.2. Pittsburgh 3-5,Virginia Tech 44 Championship Phoenix at Edmonton,4 p.m. First Period-1, Atlanta, Stefan 17 Jolene Dokic 12), Yugoslavia, def. Thursday,April i None.Rebounds—New Jersey 43(Rogers ( g Prairie View A&M 7,Southern U.2 Minnesota(29-4-2)vs.Harvard(3431), St.Louis at Chicago,4 p.m. Semifinal winners,7 p.m. 7),Cleveland 47(Boozer 11).Assists—New (Kovalchuk,Exelby),3:33. Nicole Pratt,Australia,walkover. Presbyterian 6.1,Wingate 4-8 4 P.m. Jersey 27(Harris,Jefferson 7),Cleveland Anaheim at Minnesota,4 p.m. Second Period-2,Atlanta,Heatley 10 Silvia Farina Elia(11),Italy,def.Mara Richmond 3-5,St.Joseph's 44 Third Place 25 N.Y.Islanders at New Jersey,5 p.m. K WOMEN (James 13).Total fouls—New Jersey 23, ( ovalchuk.Kaberle),1:16(pp). Santangelo,Italy,3.6,6-3,7$(3). Rollins 3-1,Eckerd 2.2 NCAA TOURNAMENT Dartmouth (24-7-2)vs. St. Lawrence Cleveland 19. Technicals—New Jersey Dallas at San Jose,9 p.m. Third Period-3, Atlanta, Heatley 11 Emilie Loit(32),France,def.Mariana S.C.-Spartanburg 4,Columbus St.2 At A Glance (27-10-1).12:30 p.m. Defensive Three Second. A-20,562 (Robitaille,Kozlov),14:43. Diaz-Oliva,Argentina,6.1,7-6(4). St.Leo 8-5,Nova Southeastern 68 All Times EST (20,562). N.Y.Rangers i 2 0 — 3 Shots on goal—Atlanta 6-6-7-19. Gisela Dulko,Argentina,def.Viktoriya Southern Miss.3,South Florida 2 Philadelphia 0 1 0 — i Florida 15-6-9-30. Kutuzova,Ukraine,6.4,41,,ret. EAST REGIONAL Tennessee 7,Auburn 6 Semifinals • 1 BASKETBALL PHOENIX(76) First Period-1,N.Y.Rangers,Jagr 31 Power-play Opportunities—Atlanta 1 of Nadia Petrova(8),Russia,def. Maria . Texas Southern 12.11,Grambting St.4- Saturday,March 27 Marion 39 0-0 6,Stoudemire 8-19 47 (Hlavac,M.Green),14:56. 3;Florida 0 of 5. Kirilenko,Russia,6.2,6-2. 4 9 At The Har lute Center NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION 0ye ss 2-4 1-2 5,Jacobsen 1.4 Second Period-2, N.Y. Rangers, Goalies—Atlanta, en 3-40(30Vera Douchevina, Russia, clef. Lino Texas St.17,MCNee'se St.4 At A GlanceJ.Green 4(Lundmark,Balej),1:05.3,N.Y. shot 030 saves).Flori ds 3.5.1(19- Krasnoroutska (28),Russia,6-0,7.5. Har r,n. All Times EST on 6.19 35 15,Lampe 6-1 RanThe Citadel 7,Wofford 4 Penn Stale 56�Came 49 kapa 19 0-0 4,Harvey 3-G 2 gars,Holik 23(Hlavac,Jagr),3:13(pp). 16). Francesca Schiavone (15), Italy, def. Tulane 9,Charlotte 5 EASTERN CONFERENCE 4 Philadelphia, Amonte 20 (Gagne, A-17,204(19,250). —2:13. Lubomira Kurhajcova,Slovakia,6-1,6-3. Connecticut 63,UC Santa Barbara 55 Atlantic Division 78 1420 76. Tuskegee 6-7,Mars Hill 2-4 Zhamnov),13:24. Championship SAN ANTONIO(105) Anna Smashnova•Pis[elesi(13),Israel, UCF 5.5,Stetson Lemoyne-Owen 1-1 W L Pot GB Third Period—None. Columbus 0 i i 1 — 3 def.Rita Grande,Italy,6.1,6-3. Monday,March 29 x•New terse 42 30 .583 _ Bowen 2.4 41 4,Duncan 6.10 2-2 14, Y UCF om Stetson 3-0 At The Hartford Civic Center Y Nesterovic 2.6 40 4F,Parker.4-8;4-6 12, Shots el goal—N.Y.Rangers 5.146= Nashville 0 2 0 0 — 2 Paola Suarez(9),Argentina,def.Denise TusVa.Commonwealth 5,Hofs[re 3 r Miami p .35;.�37 .486 7 Turko I 21.Philadelphia 9-9-21-39. First Period—None. -+ .1 -=•-"��cMaakowrCxesb,.Repubac,e-S,e2:...,. ,}(grt(Pfd,Cgon.,... .. .New York .459 9 g u 5-9-2.2 ]y4 06 3A 0-0 8;. t- Valdosta S[.7.10,gIa..Huntsville 1-7 '1 "^PowerhSy`Oppdrturinies-N.Y.Hangers' Second Period-1,Nashville,Hamhuis Venus Williams(2),United States.,def, Vanderbilt 8,Georgia 4 4) P P n State(28-5)'vs.Connecticut(28- Boston ", 2�� '0 '444_,�.,,��.0 Harry II4$0-0 9 Wi91C DOrw 7y�'Hait 5$, 1 of 3;Philadelphia 0 of 6. 7(Johansson,Elat),10:26.2,Nashville, Jie Zheng,China,64,6.4. VMI 12,Brown 7 Philadelphia -31' 42 '-.425-, : h' Goalies—N.Y Rangers,Valiquette 1-0.0 Johansson 12(Walker,Sullivan),15:51.3, Vera Zvonareva (7), Russia, def, W.Carolina 12,Davidson 10 Washington 23 49 .319 19 1 12.Ward 14 0-0 2.Totals 44-88 12-16 (39 shots 38 saves).Philadelphia,Esche Columbus,Nash 40(op s,Westcott), Tathiana Garbin,Italy,6-3,7-6(3). Webber 6.4,Fla ler 45 MID IONAL Orlando 19 55 .257 24 1.10-6 12-9,Burke 3:13 second,9-9).g Is 13 22 lb 23 — ( ) ( ) 18:Thi SVetlanaKreme,Luxembova urg,7-, 6-3.Russia,def Wes[Alabama 145,Montevallo 7-1 Central Division A-19,658 19,519).T-2:16. Sund ch 28 W L Pot GB S onto 31 29 27 18 —1 ( Third Period-4,Co ,Zherdev 12 Anne Kremer,Luxembourg,7.5,G3. West Geor is 15.2,Lincoln Memorial 4 (Svitov,Nash),14:05( Shenay Perry,United States,d f.Fabiole At Ted Constant Convocation Center x-Indiana 53 19 .736 — 3Point Goals—Phoenix 45(Marion 0.1, 1, Norfolk,Va. Jacobsen 0-1,J.Johnson 43,San Antonio Detroit 0 0 0 — 0 Overtime ace Columbus, Wright 9 Zuluaga lie Colombia,ran(3),Clef. 6-1. William&Mar 6,Delaware 5,12 In- x-Detroit 47 27 .635 7 ) Detroit 0 i 1 — 2 Y (Letohots n goal Colu Penalties—None. Naynis, Cechy,4- France,def.Tanana nin s Duke(29.3)vs.Louisiana Tech(29-2), New Orleans 37 36 .507 161h 5-14(Turkoglu 2-5,Ginobili 1-1,Hart 1-1, First Period—None. g Noon Harry 14,D.Brown 0-1,Bowen 42.Fouled Shots on goal—Columbus 9-14143— Per Li is Raymond Ukraine,4.6,nit d S ate Milwaukee 36 36 .500 17 �' ) Winthrop 8,High Paint 1 Second Period-1,Detroit,Schneider 32.Nashville 11-12-13.1-37. Lisa Raymond(20),United States,clef. MIDWEST Boston College(27.6)vs. Minnesota Cleveland 32 40 .444 21 out—None. Rebounds—Phoenix 48 14(Lidstrem,Hull),19:50(pp). (23-8),30 minutes after first game Toronto 30 42 .417 23 (Stoudemire 9),San Antonio 53(Duncan Power-play Opportunities—Columbus 1 Tanana DanielsHa,Russia,27,7-5,akin Augustana 7$,Cornell,Iowa 6-7 Third Period-2, Detroit, Datsyuk 29 of 5;Nashville 0 of 7. ela Hantuchova(27),Slovakia,clef. Aurora 7-1,Eureka 2.3 , Championship Atlanta 24 49 .329 291h 10).Assists—Phoenix 14(J.Johnson 6), (Hull,Chelics),4:06. Goalies—Columbus,Denis 20-34-7(37 Tamarine Tanasugarn,Thailand,7.6(2),3- Cent.Michigan 6,Aquinas 5 Tuesday,March 30 Chicago 20 53 .274 331/2 San Antonio 31(Parker,Ginobili,D.Brown Shots on goal—Colorado 11-11-5-27. shots-35 saves).Nashville,Vokoun 32-28- 6,6-0. Cent.Missouri 17,Missouri Southern 8 At Ted Constant Convocation Center WESTERN CONFERENCE 5).Total fouls—Phoenix 16,San Antonio Detroit 12.9-6-27. 10(32.29). Maria Sanchez Lorenzo(26),Spain,def. Norfolk,Va. Midwest Division 16.A-18,797(18,500). Power-play Opportunities—Colorado 0 of A-17,113(17,113).T-2:20. Saari Obata,Japan,3.6,6.4,6.2. Evansville le Illinois. 4 Illinois Wesleyan 4,St.Olaf 2 Semifinal winners,7 p.m. W L Pct GB 4;Detroit 1 of 2. DENVER 83 Elena ragomi Ilse (5), Russia, def. Kansas St.6,Missouri 4 x-Minnesota 50 24 .676 — ( ) Goalies—Colorado,Salo 18-19-7 (27 Dallas 1 �i 0 0 — 2 Ruxandra Dragomir Ilia,Romania,64,61. MIDWEST REGIONAL x-San Antonio 48 25 .658 1V, Anthony 10-20 34 25,Nene 2-7 33 7, Minnesota 11,Iowa 7,5 innings,rein shots-25 saves). Detroit, Legate 21-9-5 Vancouver 1 0 1 i — 3 Saint Louis 8.5,UAB 6.6 Semifinals Memphis 46 26 .639 3 Camby 1-4 2-2 4,Miller 1-15 5-6 7,Barry 3- (27-27) First Period-1, Dallas, Morrow 25 St.Olaf 14,Wis.-Stevens Pt.11 Sunday,March 28 Dallas 44 28 .611 5 9 40 9,Doleac 14 0-0 2,Boykins 4-10 4 A-20,066(19,983).T-2:23. (DiMaio, Boucher), 6:04. 2, Vancouver, i TRANSACTIONS S.Illinois 4-11,Bradley2-1 At Lloyd Noble Center Houston 41 30 .577 7'h 4 13,Andersen 1-2 0-0 2,White 6.7 1-2 14. — an, a. Utah 38 35 .521 11'h D.Sc 17(Malik),1 Dal Norm Okla. Totals 29-7818-2183. Se SE Missouri 19-6,Murray St.5.2 Chicago 0 2 i 0 — 3 Second Period-3,,Dallas,Turgeon 13 BASEBALL Stanford(26.6)vs.Vanderbilt(26.7),7 Denver 38 37 .507 12'h UTAH(85) (Sekeras),1:25. SW Missouri St.5-2,Creighton 43 St.Louis 2 i 0 i — 4 American League Tenn.-Martin 8-1,E.Illinois 3-5 p.m. Pacific Division Kirilenko 5-12 2-5 13,Gugtiotta 43 0-0 First Period-1,St.Louis,Mellanby 14 Third Period-4,Vancouver,Sanderson CLEVELAND INDIANS—Released RHP SOUTHWEST Tennessee(28-3)vs.Eaylor(26-8),30 W L Pot GB 0,Collins 2-2 2.2 6,Arroyo 9-18 0-0 19, (Savage, Weight), 10:55. 2, St. Louis, 16(Sopel,Ohlund),9:38. Giovanni Carrara. minutes after first game x-Sacramento 51 21 .708 — Giricek 5-15 4.4 14,Ostertag 1-2 0-0 2,Bell Tkachuk 32 Weinrich,Demitra,16:05. DETROIT TIGERS—Optioned RHP Franklyn Arkansas a South Carolina 4 ( ) Overtime-1,Vancouver,Morrison 21, p Arkansas Tech 1410,Central Baptist 2• Championship x-L.A.I.akers 49 23 .681 2 5-11 1-1 11,Pavlovic 2-3 0-0 5,Moore 3-10 Second Period-3, Chicago, Keith 2 :40. German to Toledo of the IL. Assigned C 1 Tuesday,March 30 Portland 37 35 .514 14 5-5 11,Lopez 2.3 0-0 4,Williams 42 0-0 0. (Berard,McCarthy),10:30(pp).4.St.Louis, Shots on goal—Dallas 4-14-6-0-24. Guillermo Rodriguez and INF Warren Morris to At Lloyd Noble Center Seattle 34 39 .466 17'/2 Totals 34-81 14-17 85. ( ) Vancouver 8.6-15.1-30. g P• Cent.Arkansas 8-10,Ouachita 2.1 Demitra 23 Tkachuk,Salvador),12:36.5, their minor league cam Traded INF Brent Cent.Oklahoma 19,NE Oklahoma 8 Norman,Okla. Golden State 31 40 .437 19'/2 Denver 23 21 21 18— 83 Chicago,Ruutu 19(Berard),16:45. Power-play 0 Abernathy to Cleveland for cash. Semifinal winners,9 n. Utah 22 21 26 16 — 85 p y Opportunities—Dallas 0 of M East Central 3,SE Oklahoma 0 p-� L.A.Clippers 27 47 .365 25 Third Period-6, Chicago, Quint 4 3;Vancouver 0 of 5. TEXAS RANGERS—Acquired OF Daryl Oklahoma 12,Baylor 11 Phoenix 25 49 .338 27 3-Point Goals—Denver 7-13(Barry 34, (McLean,Nickulas),7:16. Goalies—Dallas, Tugnutt 3-4-0 (30 Clark from Milwaukee for a player to be Oral Roberts 5,S.Alabama 3 WEST REGIONAL xclinched playoff spot Anthony 2-3,White 1.1,Boykins 1-5),Utah Overtime-7, St. Louis, Salvador 3 shots-27 saves).Vancouver,Cloutier 29-21- named. Returned RHP Chris Mabeus to S.Arkansas 16.12,Harding 40 Semifinals Saturday's Games 3-7(Pavlovic 1-1,Arroyo 1-2,Kirilenko 1-3, (Sillinger),1:50.Penalties—None. 6(24-22). Oakland. Saturday,March 27 Atlanta 97,Chicago 88 Bell 0-1).Fouled out—None.Rebounds— g g A-18,630(18,630).T-2:20. P Texas A&M 4,Texas Tech 1 g Shots on goal—Chicago 6-145-1-22. TORONTO BLUE JAYS—Optioned RHP FAR WEST At Bank of America Arena Cleveland 107,New Jersey 104 Denver 57 (Anthony, Miller 8), Utah 45 St.Louis 11-11.5-2-29. Vinnie Chulk to Syracuse of the IL.Assigned California 11,Oregon St.5 Seattle Detroit 100,New York 85 (Kirilenko 7).Assists—Denver 17(Nene 5). Power-play Opportunities—Chicago 1 of C Paul Chiaffredo,OF Noah Hall,RHP Josue Chapman 11,Occidental 1 LSU 71,Texas 55 San Antonio 105,Phoenix 76 Utah 20(Arroyo 10).Total fouls—Denver 3;St.Louis 0 of 4. 1 Matos and LHP Dave Maurer to their minor Master's 15.8,Vanguard 3-3 Georgia(24.9)vs. Purdue(29-3),30 1 Utah 85,Denver 83 22,Utah 25.Technicals—Barry.A-19,911 .Goalies—Chicago,Thibault 5.4-2 (29 le'ague camp. Middle Tennessee 6,New Mexico St 5 minutes after first game Portland 115,Seattle 108,OT (19,911). shots-25 saves).St.Louis,Osgood 28-24 PLAYERS CHAMPIONSHIP National League N.M.Highlands 5,Fort Hays St.3 Championship Minnesota 98,L.A.Clippers 82 8(22-19). Saturday NEW YORK MEfS—Traded OF Timo Monday,March 29 Sunday's Games SEATTLE 108 Southern Cal 5,UCLA 0 Y' ( ) A-19,912(19,260).T-2:24. At TPC at Sawgrass,StadiumZ th'�Chicago 'e So' for RHP Stanford 3,Cal Poly-SLO 1 At Bank of America Arena Memphis at Toronto,1 p.m. Lewis 1419 2-3 24,Evans 42 2-4 2, Ponta Verde Beach,Flter�•p UC Santa Barbara 5,Cornell 1 Seattle Dallas at Orlando,1:30 p.m. Potapenko 5.8 44 14,Barry 49 0-0 10, Los Angeles i 1 0 0 — 2 Purse:$8 millionOUIS"� ARDIN Assigned INF Semifinal winners,9 p.m. Houston at Milwaukee,4 p.m. Allen 13-20 40 32, Booth 1-2 0-0 2, Calgary 0 2 0 i — 3 Yardage:7,093;Par:72Delgal8 itt,OF Greg Miami at Indiana,5 p.m. Daniels 1-2 0-0 2,Radmanovic 1-6 40 3, First Period-1,Los Angeles,Avery 9 Third Roundo that nor.- g' amp. 1 r , NCAA DIVISION II TOURNAMENT Philadelphia at Boston,6:30 p.m. R.Murray 6.12 6-6 19.Totals 41-80 14-17 (Belanger,Cowan),5:39. Add Soo. 72.69 B K AAt A Glance Washington at Sacramento,9 p.m. 108. Second Period-2,Calgary,Simon -T• �71-68 ional B tyell A lotion MEN Championship L.A.Clippers at Golden State,9,p.m. PORTLAND(115) (Leopold,Iginla),1:26(pp).3,Los An Kevin Sutherland 66-69-73ELAND ER "ced G Jeff NCAA TOURNAMENT Saturday,March 27 Utah at L.A.Lakers,9:30 p.m. Miles 49 2-4 10,Randolph 8-15 9-10 Cowan 10 (Avery, Gleason), 7:2 4, Paul Stankowski 73-70-66 on the i 'list.At A Glance California,Pa.75,Drury 72 25,Ratliff 6.7 6.9 18,Anderson 6-14 8-10 Calgary,Conroy 8(Igm1a,Warrener),i . 22 Kenny Perry . 69-71-69 BALL All Times EST CHICAGO(88) 22,Stoudamire 8.20 2-2 23,Patterson 3$ Third Period—None. j Phil Mickelson 7469-70 — 209 Nationa tball League EAST RUTHERFORD REGIONAL NATIONAL INVITATION TOURNAMENT Johnson 2-7 0-0 4,Curry 3-10 1-2 7, 1-2 7,Abdur-Rahim 4-10 2-5 10,Gill 0-0 0• Overtime-5, Calgary, Donovan 11; Ernie Els 68.69-72 — 209 WASHINGTON REDSKINS—Matched Semifinals At A Glance A.Davis 2-5 1-1 5,J.Crawford 5.11 40 11, 0 0.Totals 39.83 3442 115. (Conroy,Gauthier),1:06.Penalties—Plon4U.Jerry Kelly 69-66-74 — 209 New Orleans'four-year offer sheet for FB Thursday,March 25 All Times EST Hinrich 4-12 0-0 10,Chandler 0-1 42 0, Seattle 22 23 2.7 28 8 —108 Shots on goal—Los Angeles 148-9.2— )Craig Parry 7472-64 — 210 Bryan Johnson. At Continental Airlines Arena Quarterfinals Pargo 6.16 1-1 14,Dupree 44 45 12.Fizer Portland 24 24 29 23 15 —115 29.Calgary 7-9-7-1-24. `Duffy Waldorf 66-73-71 — 210 HOCKEY East Rutherford,N.J. Wednesday,March 24 6.16 34 15.Gill 3-7 4.5 10.Totals 35-89 3-Point Goals—Seattle 12-26(Allen 6- Power-play Opportunities—Los Angeles Vi'jhy Singh 70.68.72 — 210 National Hockey League Oklahoma State 63,Pittsburgh 51 Richmond 63,Western Michigan 57 14-20 88. 8, Lewis 2-5, Barry 2-6, R.Murrey 1-2, 0 of 4;Calgary 1 of 3. W6*Austin 76.69-66 — 211 NHL—Suspended Chicago F Scott Nichol Saint Joseph's 84,Wake Forest 80 Creighton 74,Oregon State 64 ATLANTA(97) Radmanovic 1-5), Portland 7.13 Goalies—Los Angeles,Huet 1415-10 Paul'Casey 72-7469 — 211 two games without pay for slashing Championship UNLV 78,Western Kentucky 75 Jackson 7-22 11-12 27,C.Crawford 49 (Stoudamire 5-11,Anderson 2-2).Fouled (24 shots-21 saves).Calgary,Kiprusoff 22- Bob Buns 6742-72 — 211 Minnesota D Fllip Kuba in a March 25 game. Saturday,March 27 Thursday,March 25 2-2 11,Collier 2-9 44 8,Terry 8.15 6$26, out—None. Rebounds—Seattle 49 104(29 shots-27 saves). Padraig:HVrrington 68,70-73 — 211 COLORADO AVALANCHE—Recalled RW At Continental Airlines Arena Iowa State 66,Saint Joseph's 58 Sure 4-12 7-10 15,Diaw 2-4 1-2 5,N'Diaye (Potapenko 11), Portland 49(Randolph, . A-18,419(17,409).T-2:12. .Tiger Wood 75-69-68 — 212 Dennis Bonvie from Hershey of the AHL. East Rutherford,N.J. Semifinals 1-11-2 3,Hansen 1-4 40 2,Bradley 40 4 Ratliff 9).Assists—Seattle 29(Barry 12), Fred FuA 73-71-68 — 212 Assigned F Travis Brigley to Hershey. Oklahoma State 64,Saint Joseph's 62 Saturday,March 27 0 0,Vaughn 40 40 0.Totals 29-76 32-40 Portland 24(Stoudamire 8).Total fouls— Montreal 1 i 0 0 — 2 Matt Kuch'- 74-67-71 — 212 COLUMBUS BLUE JACKETS—Activated Creighton 81,Richmond 72 97. Seattle 27, Portland 14. A-18,554 Boston 0 1 1 1 — 3 Jeff Sluma 69-70-73 — 212 ' D Rostislav Klesta from injured reserve. ATLANTA REGIONAL Sunday,March 28 Chicago 18 20 21 29 — 88 (19,980). First Period-1,Montreal,Ward 4 Glen Da 71-75.67 — 213 TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING—Recalled C Eric Semifinals UNLV(25-7)at Iowa State(18-14),3 Atlanta 15 29 27 26 — 97 (penalty shot),:26. Mat -71-70 — 213 Perrin from Hershey of the AHL. Friday,March 26 p.m. 3-Point Goals—Chicago 4-21(Hinrich 2• MINNESOTA(98) Second Period-2,Montreal,Quintal 3 Tom e,r. 2-71-70 — 213 WASHINGTON CAPITALS—Recalled D At The Georgla Dome Championship 8, J.Crawford 1-4, Pargo 1-7, Gill 0.1, Sprewell 6.16 2-2 18,Garnett 7.14 3-3 (Ribeiro), 2:57. 3, Boston, Gonchar 11 Sergio 68-73-72 — 213 Jakub Cutta from Portland of the AHL. Atlanta March 30-April 2 Johnson 0-1), Atlanta 7-19 (Terry 4-7, 17,Johnson 1-5 0-0 2,Hassell 4-4 1-2 9, (Samsonov,Knuble),11:39(pp). Cameron 7471-72 — 213 COLLEGE Xavier 79,Texas 71 Creighton(23-9)vs.UI`LV-Iowa St.win- Jackson 2-7,C.Crawford 1.3,Hansen 0-2). Cassell 7-17 1.1 15,Hoiberg 1-3 5.5 7, Third Period-4,Boston,Samsonov 13 Alex Cejka 69.71-73 — 213 KANSAS—Named Bonnie Henrickson ' Duke 72,Illinois 62 ner Fouled out—Hinrich,Collier. Rebounds— Hudson 4-10 0-0 10,Madsen 1.2 0-0 2, (Boynton,Bergeron),1:41. women's basketball coach. Tokyo from page B1 For now,many just want a good baseball drills go.Six aisles were filled reference to the team sponsor in the asked to respond to one question in panion,Yogi Berra,asking him to snap night of sleep. with cheerleaders wearing Yankees'and move"The Bad News Bears," Spanish.Several of the Yankees on the the picture. "I went to sleep at 4,got up at 5:30" Devil Rays'jerseys and hot pants,shak- There were plenty of other shirts on dais laughed,wondering if the excel- "I thought that was priceless.It was New York shortstop Derek Jeter said. ing silver and gold pompoms. sale at the ballpark concession stands, lent interpreter would be able to trans- absolutely priceless,"Torre said. "Then I went back to sleep for about an Players couldn't believe how polite where Yankees'merchandise dominated late the Spanish into Japanese—she In the evening,players from both hour,ate,went back to sleep for 45 everyone was. by a 4-to-1 margin.Jeter,Alex wasn't. teams attended a reception that fea- minutes." "It's unbelievable.You don't get that Rodriguez and Jason Giambi T-shirts Showing the cultural differences, tured many,along with commissioner Upon getting up for his first full day kind of treatment in the States,"Tampa cost$37.77.Genuine—but not au- Torre pointed out the Yankees were ap- Bud Selig,donning"happi"coats and in Japan,Jeter found out things sure Bay's Aubrey Huff said. thentic—Yankees and Devil Rays jer- plauded by the Japanese media while breaking sake barrels with baseball bats, were a whole lot different.He went to When players got to their lockers, seys were$136.82,and team jackets cost the New York press crew sat silently. not the traditional hammers. the hotel restaurant for some sushi. they found white 3-inch patches on $186.40. General manager Brian Cashman was On Sunday morning,Torre and "It's kind of mind-boggling,to say their shirt sleeves with the words On the scoreboard,videos were introduced as a member of the Yankees' Cashman traveled by Blackhawk heli- the least,"Jeter said."I don't know what "Ricoh"in red.Just like when the New shown of the Yankees'players saying partnership—he wishes he owned copter to Camp Zama along with Jorge I ate today—he said,`Special sugges- York Mets met the Chicago Cubs four "kon nichiwa(hello)"to the fans.All stock! Posada,Ruben Sierra,Gabe White and tion.'" years ago in the first Japanese season spoke Japanese phrases except Matsui, "That was just a little something ex- Joe Girardi. By mid-afternoon,players were at opener,major league baseball sold uni- whose greeting was in English. tra for the Christmas stocking,"Torre "This is one of the great events of the Tokyo Dome,which looks a bit like form ads. Showing how international the joked. the year,"U.S.Army Maj.Gen.Nick Tropicana Field with the roof of the Mussina kept running his fingers game has become,the Yankees'news At breakfast,a fan who wanted a Perkins said."It just makes you tingle Metrodome and nicknamed"The Big over the patch to smooth it out. conference include three languages— photo of himself and Torre handed his all over to stand with Joe Torre in the Egg."The workout was boisterous as "Chico's Bail Bonds?"he suggested,a Rodriguez and Mariano Rivera were camera to the manager's dining com- pinstripes." 1. . r I t `1 . B4 BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, March 28, 2004 There's no place I'Ike home for ,Connectmicut Irish(2 1-11)with 22 points and 12 rebounds.Her Huskies hold Gauchos to 32 layup with 1:50 left tied the game at 49. percent shooting, move on to Mazzante hit the go-ahead basket on the next possession and got right back on defense.She battle Penn State Monday leaped high to steal a pass intended for Batteast with 35 seconds left,and Penn State was in control the rest of the way.Tanisha Wright made a key of- By The Associated Press fensive rebound and the Lady Lions made shot 4- for-6 from the line to seal the win. HARTFORD,Conn.—Having Diana Taurasi m The Irish,who at one point this season had a isn't the only thing that separates Connecticut record of 7-6,missed a pair of 3-pointers in the from just about every other team. - = closing seconds. The Huskies'defense is downright nasty and - The Lady Lions got a scare early in the second that's what saved them from a stunning upset on half when center Reicina Russell went down with a Saturday. t) knee injury and had to be helped from the court. Connecticut needed every stop it could muster, = The 6-foot-6 freshman returned about four min- plus some clutch shooting from Taurasi,to beat utes later to an ovation and finished with 10 re- feisty UC Santa Barbara 63-55 and advance to the bounds and two blocks. East Regional final against top-seeded Penn State I Mazzante,who shot 6-for-16,also grabbed on Monday night. eight rebounds.She opened the game bytaking "I thought both teams were tremendous on de- r r the ball away from a driving Le'Tania Severe and fense"UConn coach Geno Auriemma said."That S made an easy layup.Her second pick came after a was as hard as anybody has played against us and "`" bucket by Brungo,when she stole the inbounds as well.And I thought we were just as good.That's pass for another easy layup. probably why we're both here.Teams that don't "I just decided to stick around and see if I play good defense are not playing at this point,' could get one of those easy ones,"Mazzante said. Second-seeded Connecticut(28-4),seeking its "Batteast threw it right to me.I was just in the fourth national championship in five years,held _ right place." UCSB to 32 percent shooting and frustrated �� Portland said Mazzante began calling for the Lindsay Taylor,the Gauchos'6-foot-8 center. ball late in the game,something the All-American That enabled the Huskies to survive 17 � ,. �� senior rarely does. turnovers and their own 39.6 percent shooting. "That's something that she's maybe done Taurasi led UConn with 21 points and became twice,"Portland said."The last time I didn't listen the.school's career leader in assists.Barbara Turner to her was in'the Big 10 tournament.I thought she added 13 points,while Jessica Moore had 10 was in a nice flow.You could just tell things were special for her." points and 10 rebounds and led the defensive ef- s P fort against Taylor. "P LSU 71' Texas 55 "That was the keythe game,the fact that we Connecticut's Jessica Moore(31)falls over UC Santa Barbara's April McDivitt during the second to g ha if of their NCAA East Regional senidfinal In Hartford Conr.,on Saturday. SEATTLE—The way could e Augustus was were able to contain her on the inside,"Turner , cld shooting,the LSU mascot could have been on the said."Because that forced them to make a lot of a couple of inboutids passes in,knock down the top-seeded Lady L--ons to a 55-49 win o-er bench to coach the Lady Tigers. plays on the outside.' (slkots)and the rest will take care of itself" Notre Dame in the East Regional semifinal. Augustus scored 29 points on 14-of-19 shoot- UConn kept bodies on Taylor throughout the McDivitt's line-drive 3-pointer from the top of Mazzan-e finished with 17 points and a tearn- ing,and Tameka Johnson added 12 points and.13 game and forced her into tough shots.She man- the key pulled UCSB to 45-39 with 7:28 to play, high three steals—one to open the game,cr>e hit assists,leading fourth-seeded LSU to a 71-55 win aged just five points on 2-for-11 shooting. plenty of time to keep hacking away at tl_e lead- led to ar-easy basket and one that helped sea_the over top-seeded Texas on Saturday night in the "They defended me the same way all the other BLt Taurasi hit a baseline jumper,then nailed a win. West regional semifinals. teams have.I'm used to that,"Taylor said."I got turnaround shot to put the Huskies back up by 10. "We needed a defensive stop.We didn't ec.that The Lady Tigers(25-7)advanced to meet the the ball in the post where I wanted it.I just didn't Taylor's basket inside cut the lead to 51-44,and for 38 rninates,"Penn State coach Rene Portland winner of the late game between Purdue and make the most of my shots.I don't think they did he Gauchos had a chance to draw even closer af- said."We did that for the last two minutes and A Georgia. anything special to defend me.It was all my fault." ter Moore missed the front end of a one-arid-one. made the difference." LSU looked great in the hands of acting coach April McDivitt,who played her first three sea- BLt Taurasi stole the ball from McDivitt=o end The Lady Lions(28-5)and Mazzante straggled Dana"Pokey"Chatman,who has filled in over the sons at Tennessee,led Santa Barbara with 20 that threat,then came around a screen and hit a offensively against Notre Dame's stubborn zone past two months while Basketball Hall of Fame points and kept the 1 lth-seeded Gauchos(27-7) fadeaway from 17 feet to make it 53-44 with 1:18 but made tine big shots and big plays when tt ey member Sue Gunter battled acute bronchitis. threatening until the final minute. remaining. needed it most. Texas(30-5)won last year's meeting 78-60 to Kristen Mann scored 12 for UCSB,which made "We defended that just textbook and;he faded Jessica Erungo led Penn State with 20 poi-nL in reach the Final Four,and it was sweet for the Lady 11 steals but simply couldn't hit the shots it need- and just drained it,"UCSB coach Mark French a game in which neither team led by more than s:y Tigers to take the rematch in such lopsided fashion. ed to pull ahead in the second half. sa-d."That's what good players do." points. This wasn't the kind of Texas two-step that Taurasi,on the other hand,did make those "We didn't attack(the zone)enough and hey Longhorns fans wanted to see.The loss came one Penn State 55 shots,coming through to keep the Gauchos at bay Notre Dame 49 kept pushixg us back further and further past tze night after Texas lost 79-71 to Xavier at the same down the stretch.She also had five rebounds and HARTFORD,Conn.—Penn State relied on 3-point;'Mazzante said."I think we made sine point in the men's tournament. her four assists gave her 640,breaking Jennifer Kelly Mazzante's offense throughout the season adjustments at halftur-e and we started goir-€ir, Augustus was fabulous in the first 20 minutes, Rizzotti's record of 637. 0-1 Saturday,the Lady Lions needed her defense, the right direction! hitting 6-of-8 from the floor to help LSU to a 37- "It's been a long season and we've been in that too. Pettn.State will play second-seeded Connectcut 24 halftime lead.She made shots from everywhere situation a couple of times,"Taurasi sai er Mazzante hit a floating jumper w 6 secczds on Mo for a berth in the Final Four. neath the basket,jumpers from the top of you're in it,you don't start to panic.WeWto get left and made a key steal down the s1W to le=_d JacgWe Batteast led the fifth-seeded Fghtirg the Wd a few fast-break layups. ... B a lot co ach looks to-Summitt La , Tech ' pes ' h i�st or i s fo advice and not for a bigvein'on its side a ainst Du . e NORMAN,okra-(AP)— ;`She's my kind of coach. A lot of what NORFOLK,Va.(AP)— State.Both games were in women's gam e. Kim Mulkey-Robertson remem- Duke brings impressive creden- December. Now,Budke is continuing it. bers how Pat Summitt stood by do vYas Ilearned from Pat Summitt. ... She's tials into the Mideast Regional. Now,the Lady Techsters are Louisiana Tech and Tennessee her when she was a player and Louisiana Tech has some im- ready to give their all against are the only schools to have comforted her when she was everything I aspire to be as a coach." pressive ones,too. All-American Alana Beard and played in all 23 NCAA tourna- about to become a mother. The Lady Techsters have won the Blue Devils,and_o add to ments.Tech ended two of them It's why Mulkey-Robertson - Baylor coach Kim Mulkey-Robertson, two national titles,and they are the program's tradition. as national champions,in 1982 has nothing but admiration for `Absoltte not you made this earance in the round of 16. one of two teams to make the "I wanted to go to a school and 1988. the legendary Tennessee coach �' y P team and yo NCAA tournament all 23 years, where I could possibly win a Budke's record in two year_ she'll face Sunday in the NCAA will be ready"' Tennessee is there for the while the Blue Devils are still national championship,"said is 60-5,and he's coaching in h--s Midwest Regional semifinals. Mulkey-1<-obertson said."It 23rd conseccutiutiveve time. looking for their first national guard Erica Smith-Taylor,who second straight round c f 16. "I just love Pat Summitt;' took me three weeks and I was "Our fans are excited-they championship. averaged 29.5 points in victories Last year's team lost 69-63 to said Mulkey-Robert-son,coach back 0 fill;weed.' are excited just to be in the The two meet Sunday for a against Montana and Texas Louisiana State. of fourth-seeded Baylor."She's Surrn itt said making a ros- Sweet 16,"Mulkey-Robertson berth in the regional final. Tech in the first two rounds. He's also coaching against c my kind of coach.A lot of what ter change was never a serious said."Her fans would probably Louisiana Tech has won 21 That was first on my list.I one-time target of his program. I do was learned from Pat "consiceration. t straight,the longest streak in the wanted to win,I didn want to Beard grew up in 16." country, be disappointed if they didn't Sumrrstt.She's hard-nosed,she H_ leadership,her mental make it to the Sweet 16. 't a mother,she's marred.She tough_nes�,her attitude—she's In the other regional semifi- country,and top-seeded Duke go to a school where[could av Shreveport,La.,about(0 miles a -eat zss,h e attitude de—she's itt nil,second-seeded Vanderbilt (29-3)has won 12 in a row. erage 30 points a game and lose. from Ruston,and said takes her career and passion for g Nonetheless,the Lady Techsters Trina Frierson,whose 16- Louisiana Tech was"in:he pic- the game seriously,and at the said. felt like she would bring will be making its 11th appear- (29-2)got a seven eed. oint scoring average is second ture"when she was being re- same tint_she loves her family. somet-ing to our Olympic team ante in the round of 16 and 'Whe u ge e fellow frontcourt player cruited.Her desire to get awao "Sl:e's everything I aspire to that ob-rictu_y was contagious.' No.6 seed Stanford(26-6)its 16,you'r g ay - isha Carter(17.2;on the sea- helped lead her to Duke. be as a teach:' Th?team.went on to win the 13th. body gr second- son,said her pull to go to the There,she has won three Mulkey-Robertson played on gold medal The Commodores(26-7) year Lo coach school' Atlantic Coast Conference play- the 1934 Olympic team Summitt Years late_when Mulkey- will need to find a way to slow Budke o atchu 5,000)was a same. er of the year awards and led coached.Summitt er_deared her- Robertson was pregnant with down All-American Nicole Duke. ig well b "I wanted to became a the Blue Devils to the F nal self to the young player six weeks her fiat c:u'd,Makenzie,and Powell,who's averaging 20 best team in th ation." of the tradition,"she said Four the last two years. before the Olympics started, conce-ned zbout how her career points per game this season. The other game pits third- So did Budke,even gh This season,Beard a-erage= when Mulkey-Robertson frac- would be affected,Summitt was She'll post up guards if you seeded Boston College(27-8) others weren't sold idea. 20.1 points and became the fir3t tured her foot. there again. put a guard against her.She'll and coach Cathy Inglese against Budke replaced iana woman at Duke to have her "I woke up one morning and "I just taLced to her as a take you outside if you put a seventh-seeded Minnesota(23- Tech icon Leon B re as number retired,joining 11 couldn't--valk,"Mulley- mom,'Strnrnitt said. post(player)on her,"Vanderbilt 8)and coach Pam Borton,a coach before las won.He men's jerseys in the rafters. Robertson said."The doctors Theyc•urC Louisiana Tech coach Melanie Balcomb."She former assistant to Inglese at laughs now w e recalls Duke coach Gail said stay off of it for three to assistant coach never forgot. presents a very tough matchup Vermont and later with the telling friends a:leaving a Goestenkors said exper-ence four weeks." As t_he 7 cross paths again, for whatever you decide to do Eagles. Texas comm y college to be- seems to be helping her team so Summitt refused to pick an Mulkey-Foxrtson's Bears(26- against her." Louisiana Tech,the Western come B We four far.The Blue Devils lost in the alternate. 8)wiL belcoking for the Balcomb said the Athletic Conference champion, years a national semifinals in each of "I'll never forget when I had biggestwln in school history. Commodores would guard the has already played two of the "Peop e stupid and the last two years,giving Bear3 my meeting with her.She said Baylor is_tta'-cirtg its first ap- 6-foot-2 forward by committee. other top NCAA seeds this sea- called me or following and fellow seniors Iciss Tillis son,losing 85-65 at Tennessee Leon;'he s ,because Barmore and Vicki Krapohl one`-ast and winning 87-84 at Penn had built a dynasty i--t the chance to win a national title. Oidy2 Week left t0 SAVE 1 0001!NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A CONDITIONAL.USE PERMIT Offer Expires,March 31 2004 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday_ April 12,2004 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room,City Hall:411 East 18 Hole Championship Course New White Sand Bunkers Main Street,Bozeman,Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Subdivision DrUng Range%Practice facilities Pro Shop-Full Service/Lessons Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development.requested by the applicant/owner,Gallatin Cer_ter Full SENice Restaurant&Bar-Best Pado in Town nth Spectacular Views LP,5550 LBJ Freeway,Suite 380,Dallas,TX 75240,and represented by Allied Engineering,32 Discovery Leagues(Mend,Ladies Couples) Junior Golf Programs Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718. Said application would increase the number of allowable entryway P31on signs. property g y y property Fun&FriendlyMembers Reasonable Dues Theis legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision City of Bozeman Montana. The � is zoned`B-2"(Community Business District)and"BP"(Business Park District)and is generally locL;ed - - west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valle-Center Drive. - - - Written and verbal testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may be dir--cted tc the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bo.eman,LIT ... 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning anc Community Development Department,20 East Olive Street, 60. For those who require accomno- LEY ` / GOLF � CALL TODAI 587-9751 dations for disabilities,please contact Ron Bre,,City of Bozemanzeman ADA Coordinator,582-2 06(voice) V I e 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification. r r Memorandum To: Development Review Committee , From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Planne V Date: March 30, 2004—Third Week Review Conditions Subject: Modification of Gallatin Center Subdivision CUP for a PUD, #Z-04033 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. 6. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage. • Memorandum To: Development Review Committee From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Plannef� Date: March 30, 2004—Third Week Review Conditions Subject: Modification of Gallatin Center Subdivision CUP for a PUD, #Z-04033 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base (i.e. 360 square feet) that demonstrates a variety of season color, shape and texture, and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. 6. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of four entryway pylon signs along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage. • AGENDA • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CONFERENCE ROOM, ALFRED M. STIFF BUILDING, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET TUESDAY, MARCH 30, 2004 10:00 A.M ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE ITEM 2. PROJECT REVIEWS ITEM 3. FINAL WEEK REVIEW. 1. Gallatin Center PUD Mods#Z-04033 (Windemaker/Murray) North-19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive �= A request to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to allow an additional freestanding sign. ITEM 4. SECOND WEEK REVIEW 1. Winegardners Wine Warehouse SP/COA #Z-04028 (Morns/Johnson) Gallatin Park Drive * A Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of a 2,992 sq. ft. wine wholesale warehouse and related site improvements. 2. West Winds MaSub Prel. Plat#P-04009 (Morns/Stodola) E. of Davis Lane, S. of Baxter Lane, W. of North 271h Avenue, N. of Oak Street A Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application to allow the subdivision of 93.28 acres into 88 lots for residential development with related site improvements. 3. West Winds Zoning PUD#Z-04050 (Morns/Stodola) E. of Davis Lane, S. of Baxter Lane, W. of North 27`h Avenue, N. of Oak Street * A Zoning Planned Unit Development Application to allow construction on 93.28 acres of single-household units, senior housing units (assisted and independent), neighborhood commercial facilities, and park/open space with related site improvements. 4. Lower Storage Yards COA/Further Development#Z-04051 (Bristor/Johnson) 1812 North Rouse Avenue * A Further Development Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of additional buildings for storage and fire department training with related site improvements. 5. Williams Plumbing Addition SP#Z-04020 (Kozub/Johnson) 2131 Industrial Drive 4` A Site Plan Application to allow the construction of an 8,356 sq. ft. warehouse addition and related site improvements. (OVER) i 6. Charles Pl.*Condos SP#Z-04045 (Skelton/Murr- Glenwood Drive, Forestglen Drive, and Annie Street * A Site Plan Application to allow the construction of a 68-unit condominium development in 10 buildings with related site improvements. ITEM 5. INITIAL WEEK REVIEW 1. Phillips ADU CUP#Z-04048 (Bristor/Murray) 1022 South 5`" Avenue * A Conditional Use Permit Application to allow the construction of a 970 sq. ft., two bedroom Accessory Dwelling Unit over a two car garage and single bay carport. (First of a two week review.) 2. Ice Pond Tech Park ZMA #Z-04031 (Sanford/Murray) 300 Ice Pond Road * A Zone Map Amendment Application to amend the City of Bozeman zoning map from R-S (Residential Suburban) to B-P (Business Park) zoning on a 6.978 acre tract of land. 3. Ebbighausen Homes Condos SP#Z-04043 (Morris/Murray) Glenwood Drive A Site Plan Application to allow the construction of 18 condominium units in four 4-plex buildings and one duplex building with related site improvements. 4. Lehrkind Bottling Addition SP/COA #Z-04042 (Kozub/Murray) 1715 North Rouse Avenue * A Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of a 29,945 square foot warehouse and office addition with related site improvements. ITEM 6. PUBLIC COMMENT— (15 —20 minutes) (Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Development Review Committee, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker. ) ITEM 7. ADJOURNMENT This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,please contact-ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2306 (voice)or 582-2301 (TDD). 2 101 Bt� &S x sC ram} " v D`R SaTFF R�E�P`®�RT "' "� g sp �` � ,w RE 41 P P Wwly"I��I�CA�T�I�O�N � ��, � °u�.'h. , ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION#Z-04033—AN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF THE GALLATIN CENTER CUP FOR A PUD MODIFICATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE ' ENTRYWAY PYLON SIGNS. ,THE PROPERTY, LOCATED WEST OF NORTH NINETEENTH BETWEEN BAXTER LANE AND VALLEY CENTER DRIVE,IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED "B-2" f (COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT)AND"BP"(BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT). APPLICANT/OWNER: GALLATIN CENTER LP, 5550 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 380, DALLAS, TX 75240. REPRESENTATIVE: ALLIED ENGINEERING, 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2004, 3:30 P.M.,ALFRED M.STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING,20 EAST OLIVE STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: LANETTE WINDEMAKER, AICP; CONTRACT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION The property, located west of North Nineteenth between Baxter'Lane and Valley Center Drive, is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. i i GATR©N t� 0 { SU E P •PER+TY R- iala R- ti -1 aNcr PROPOSAL Application has been made for a review of the Gallatin Center Subdivision CUP for a PUD modification to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The PUD is current allowed two entryway pylon signs and one interchange pylon sign. The subject property is zoned "B-2" (Community Business District) and `BP" (Business Park District). The existing interchange pylon sign stands on the north side of Valley Center Road. The single existing entryway pylon sign is located on the south side of Burke Street. The proposed additional entryway pylon sign is shown on the north side of Deadmans Gulch extended(Cattail Street). And the remaining entryway pylon sign is about.900 feet north of Baxter Lane, or about 1600 feet south of the proposed additional sign. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW The intent of the planned unit development concept is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically,with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health,safety and welfare, it shall be the intent of this title to promote the city's pursuit of community objectives as outlined in Section 18.36.010 of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. In addition to the objectives outlined in of Section 18.36.010, general design criteria and development standards described in Chapter 18.30 shall apply to all development occurring within the Entryway Corridor Overlay areas. Further, it is a requirement that any of these developments comply with all of the specific development standards of the Design Objectives Plan for North 19'h Avenue/West Oak Street Corridors. #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification DRB Staff Report 2 The ADR staff review of this proposal has been attached. PUBLIC COMMENT The Planning Office has not received any public comment as of the writing of this staff report. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This proposal is the Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD, and must comply with the intent of planned unit development as stated in UDO Chapter 18.36. Based on the above summary review, the Planning Office recommends the Design Review Board forward a recommendation of conditional approval of the_application with the following conditions: 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four (4) square feet of landscaping for every one(1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base(i.e. 360 square feet)that demonstrates a variety of season color,shape and texture,and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19'h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane,depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs,for review and approval by the Planning Office,and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. (Any additional pylon signs that the applicant wishes to be considered should be part of this application). 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. NOTE: The Design Review Board will forward a formal recommendation to the City Commission on this matter who will in turn consider an action on this application on April 12, 2004. #2-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification DRB Staff Report 3 • Attachments: Applicant's Submittal. ADR staff memo. cc: Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240 Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification DRB Staff Report 4 CIOF BOZEMAN is DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � a1+ Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM TO: LANETTE WINDEMAKER, AICP,�COONNTRACT PLANNER FROM: DAVE SKELTON, A.D.R. STAFF RE: GALLATIN CENTER MODIFICATIONS TO P.U.D. ZONING FILE NO. Z-04033 DATE: MARCH 13, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.D.R. Staff for the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Communityi Development has reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit to modiy the Gallatin Center P.U.D. guidelines to add a third entryway pylon sign at the intersection of North 19`h Avnue and Cattail Street; and as a result, offer the following comments for consideration. The application states the request is for a third entryway pylon sign, the narrative is requesting the addition of a new pylon sign at the intersection of North 19`h Avenue and Cattail Street. This should be made clear with the application. With this proposal the exhibits show three (3) pylon signs within 1,600 feet of one another, and a fourth further south that covers the remaining 2,500 feet to Baxter Lane. Does this mean the applicant will ask for additional pylyon signs between Cattail Street and Baxter Lane? This proposal suggest that additional pylon signs will be request with further development to the south. The proposed entryway corridor pylon sign is consistent with the guidelines for the planned unit develeopment, which is generally considered nonintrusive signage along the corridor. What the existing pylon signs lack is a solid foundation and sense of permanence. As a result, the applicant should consider a stronger sense of permanence at the foundation of the pylon sign with landscape features that will provide season color, change and texture. Furthermore, any proposal for internally illuminated cabinets should be such that the backdrop of the cabinets provides a soft, low intense glow that is not white, or other brillant color scheme. With the applicant now proceeding with development in Phase Four of Gallatin Center Subdivison P.U.D., the market for further development in the planned unit development should be somewhat more predictable. As should be the demand for additional signage along the entryway corridor. Therefore, with this application, the applicant should provide a master plan for signage along the entryway corridor that depicts a commitment by the developer for pylon signs along the corridor. Should the applicant wish to install additional pylon signs along the corridor, it should be made with this application and omit the potential for further consideration of additional pylon signs in the future. The following recommendations should be considered with this application: planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation . housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination 1. That the entyway pylon sign to be installed is identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height, that 4 sq. ft. of landscape for every 1 sq. ft. of signage be installed at the base (i.e., 360 sq. ft.) that demonstrates a variety in season color, shape, and texture, that the landscaped base be defined by an appropriatly designed concrete curb, and that the applicant provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 2. That the applicant verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intense illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. That the appliant provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`h Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. (Any additional pylon signs that the applicant wishes to be considered should be part of this application). Page 2 DRB STAFF REPORT GALLATIN CENTER CUP FOR A PUD MODIFICATION" #Z-04033 ITEM: ZONING APPLICATION#Z-04033—AN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF THE GALLATIN CENTER CUP FOR A PUD MODIFICATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE ENTRYWAY PYLON SIGNS. THE PROPERTY, LOCATED WEST OF NORTH NINETEENTH BETWEEN BAXTER LANE AND VALLEY CENTER DRIVE,IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED "13-2" (COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT)AND"BP"(BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT). APPLICANT/OWNER: GALLATIN CENTER LP, 5550 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 380, DALLAS, TX 75240. REPRESENTATIVE: ALLIED ENGINEERING, 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2004, 3:30 P.M.,ALFRED M.STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING,20 EAST OLIVE STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: LANETTE WINDEMAKER, AICP; CONTRACT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION The property, located west of North Nineteenth between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive, is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. S1J E P •PERdY ' R a R -1 g� R- B 2 PROPOSAL Application has been made for a review of the Gallatin Center Subdivision CUP for a PUD modification to increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The PUD is current allowed two entryway pylon signs and one interchange pylon sign. The subject property is zoned `B-2" (Community Business District) and "BP" (Business Park District). The existing interchange pylon sign stands on the north side of Valley Center Road. The single existing entryway pylon sign is located on the south side of Burke Street. The proposed additional entryway pylon sign is shown on the north side of Deadmans Gulch extended(Cattail Street). And the remaining entryway pylon sign is about 900 feet north of Baxter Lane,or about 1600 feet south of the proposed additional sign. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW The intent of the planned unit development concept is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically,with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health,safety and welfare, it shall be the intent of this title to promote the city's pursuit of community objectives as outlined in Section 18.36.010 of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. In addition to the objectives outlined in of Section 18.36.010, general design criteria and development standards described in Chapter 18.30 shall apply to all development occurring within the Entryway Corridor Overlay areas. Further, it is a requirement that any of these developments comply with all of the specific development standards of the Design Objectives Plan for North 19`" Avenue/West Oak Street Corridors. #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification DRB Staff Report 2 • • The ADR staff review of this proposal has been attached. PUBLIC COMMENT The Planning Office has not received any public comment as of the writing of this staff report. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This proposal is the Gallatin Center Subdivision PUD, and must comply with the intent of planned unit development as stated in UDO Chapter 18.36. Based on the above summary review, the Planning Office recommends the Design Review Board forward a recommendation of conditional approval of the application with the following conditions: 1. The entryway pylon sign to be installed shall be identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height. 2. Four(4) square feet of landscaping for every one (1) square feet of signage shall be installed at the base(i.e. 360 square feet)that demonstrates a variety of season color,shape and texture,and the landscaped base shall be defined by an appropriately designed concrete curb. The applicant shall provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. The applicant shall verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intensity illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 4. The applicant shall provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19`" Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane,depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs,for review and approval by the Planning Office,and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. (Any additional pylon signs that the applicant wishes to be considered should be part of this application). 5. Any single tenant shall be limited to signage on only one (1) entryway pylon sign. NOTE: The Design Review Board will forward a formal recommendation to the City Commission on this matter who will in turn consider an action on this application on April 12, 2004. #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification DRB Staff Report 3 • • Attachments: Applicant's Submittal. ADR staff memo. cc: Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240 Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification DRB Staff Report 4 CI*bF BOZEMAN 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: LANETTE WINDEMAKER,AICP, CONTRACT PLANNER FROM: DAVE SKELTON, A.D.R. STAFF �XvJE:_ RE: GALLATIN CENTER MODIFICATIONS TO P.U.D. ZONING FILE NO. Z-04033 DATE: MARCH 13, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.D.R. Staff for the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Communityi Development has reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit to modiy the Gallatin Center P.U.D. guidelines to add a third entryway pylon sign at the intersection of North 19`h Avnue and Cattail Street; and as a result, offer the following comments for consideration. The application states the request is for a third entryway pylon sign, the narrative is requesting the addition of a new pylon sign at the intersection of North 19`" Avenue and Cattail Street. This should be made clear with the application. With this proposal the exhibits show three (3) pylon signs within 1,600 feet of one another, and a fourth further south that covers the remaining 2,500 feet to Baxter Lane. Does this mean the applicant will ask for additional pylyon signs between Cattail Street and Baxter Lane? This proposal suggest that additional pylon signs will be request with further development to the south. The proposed entryway corridor pylon sign is consistent with the guidelines for the planned unit develeopment, which is generally considered nonintrusive signage along the corridor. What the existing pylon signs lack is a solid foundation and sense of permanence. As a result, the applicant should consider a stronger sense of permanence at the foundation of the pylon sign with landscape features that will provide season color, change and texture. Furthermore, any proposal for internally illuminated cabinets should be such that the backdrop of the cabinets provides a soft, low intense glow that is not white, or other brillant color scheme. With the applicant now proceeding with development in Phase Four of Gallatin Center Subdivison P.U.D., the market for further development in the planned unit development should be somewhat more predictable. As should be the demand for additional signage along the entryway corridor. Therefore, with this application, the applicant should provide a master plan for signage along the entryway corridor that depicts a commitment by the developer for pylon signs along the corridor. Should the applicant wish to install additional pylon signs along the corridor, it should be made with this application and omit the potential for further consideration of additional pylon signs in the future. The following recommendations should be considered with this application: planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation . historic preservation . housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination • 0 1. That the entyway pylon sign to be installed is identical to the existing entryway signs in style, design, materials, and height, that 4 sq. ft. of landscape for every 1 sq. ft. of signage be installed at the base (i.e., 360 sq. ft.) that demonstrates a variety in season color, shape, and texture, that the landscaped base be defined by an appropriatly designed concrete curb, and that the applicant provide a landscape plan for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 2. That the applicant verify on the elevations for the pylon sign that any internally illuminated cabinets constructed with said pylon sign will contain a subtle color for a backdrop with any illumination output proposed installed as a soft, low intense illumination, for review and approval by A.D.R. staff. 3. That the appliant provide with this application a Master Plan for entryway signage along the entire North 19"' Avenue frontage for Gallatin Center Subdivision P.U.D., situated between Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane, depicting the placement of all existing and future pylon signs, for review and approval by the Planning Office, and no further proposals for additional pylon signs that are not depicted on the Master Plan will be considered. (Any additional pylon signs that the applicant wishes to be considered should be part of this application). Page 2 AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET CONFERENCE ROOM TUESDAY,MARCH 23, 2004 3:30 P.M. ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE ITEM 2. ELECTION OF OFFICERS A. CHAIRPERSON B. VICE CHAIRPERSON ITEM 3. MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 24, 2004 ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 1. Gallatin Center PUD Mods#Z-04033 (Windemaker) -' North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane.and Valley Center Drive * A request to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to allow an additional freestanding sign. ITEM 5. PUBLIC COMMENT—(15 —20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.} ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,please contact ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2306(voice)or 582.2301(TDD). ! r 40 49 - - � � (�Vll r � ��. cam. ` s� vas- syt Iv- ct Kv S'� k`S _ tt�� 6ors, ci *� V „��►. �1 e� � °� _ J�4 . va • AGENDA • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CONFERENCE ROOM,ALFRED M. STIFF BUILDING,20 EAST OLIVE STREET TUESDAY,MARCH 23,2004 10:00 A.M ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE ITEM 2. PROJECT REVIEWS ITEM 3. FINAL WEEK REVIEW 1. The Aspens at Bridger Creek Annexation#A-04002(Saunders/Murray) Northeast corner of Story Mill Road and Boylan Road * An Annexation Application to allow the annexation of 20.12±into the city. 2. The Aspens at Bridger Creek ZMA#Z-04030 (Saunders/Murray) Northeast corner of Story Mill Road and Boylan Road * A Zone Map Amendment Application to establish urban zoning classifications of R-1 (Residential,Low Density District) and R-3 (Residential, Medium Density) on 20.12±acres in conjunction with annexation. 3. North Christy Park Neighborhood ZMA#Z-04029 (Sanford/Johnson) South Rouse Avenue, South Black Avenue,East Lincoln Street, East Garfield Street * A Zone Map Amendment Application to amend the City of Bozeman zoning map from R-3 (Residential, One-to Five-Household)to R-1 (Residential, Single- Household), affecting 118 residential lots. 4. Cattail Creek Phase 3 Annexation#A-04003 (Skelton/Murray) South of Hubert Road between Davis Lane and North 27 h Avenue * An Annexation Application to allow the annexation of 50.58±acres into the city. 5. Cattail Creek Phase 3 ZMA#Z-04035 (Skelton/Murray) South of Hubert Road between Davis Lane and North 27`h Avenue * A Zone Map Amendment Application to establish urban zoning classifications of R-1 (Single-Household,Residential District), R-2(One—and Two-Household, Residential District), and R-3 (One-to Five-Household,Residential District), Industrial, and other uses on 50.58±acres in conjunction with annexation. 6. Cattail Creek Phase 3 MaSub Pre-Ap#P-04008 (Skelton/Murray) Davis Lane South of Hubert Road between Davis Lane and North 27"'Avenue * A Subdivision Pre-Application for the subdivision of 50.58±into 66 lots for R-1 (Single-Household, Residential District), R-2(One—and Two-Household, Residential District), and R-3 (One-to Five-Household,Residential District), Industrial, and other uses. ITEM 4. SECOND WEEK REVIEW 1. Gallatin Center PUD Mods#Z-04033 (Windemaker/Murray) North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive * A request to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to allow an additional freestanding sign. (OVER) 1 ITEM 5. INITIAL AIL REVIEW • 1. Winegardners Wine Warehouse SP/COA#Z-04028 (Morris/Johnson) Gallatin Park Drive * A Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of a 2,992 sq. ft. wine wholesale warehouse and related site improvements. 2. West Winds MaSub Prel.Plat#P-04009(Morris/Stodola) E. of Davis Lane, S. of Baxter Lane,W. of North 27"'Avenue, N. of Oak Street * A Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application to allow the subdivision of 93.28 acres into 88 lots for residential development with related site improvements. 3. West Winds Zoning PUD#Z-04050 (Morris/Stodola) E. of Davis Lane, S. of Baxter Lane, W. of North 27"'Avenue,N. of Oak Street * A Zoning Planned Unit Development Application to allow construction on 93.28 acres of single-household units, senior housing units (assisted and independent), neighborhood commercial facilities, and park/open space with related site improvements. 4. Lower Storage Yards COA/Further Development#Z-04051 (Bristor/Johnson) 1812 North Rouse Avenue * A Further Development Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of additional buildings for storage and Fire Department Training with related site improvements. 5. Williams Plumbing Addition SP#Z-04020(Kozub/Johnson) 2131 Industrial Drive A Site Plan Application to allow the construction of an 8,356 sq. ft. warehouse addition and related site improvements. 6. Charles Place Condos SP#Z-04045 (Skelton/Murray) Glenwood Drive,Forestglen Drive, and Annie Street * A Site Plan Application to allow the construction of a 68-unit condominium development in 10 buildings with related site improvements. ITEM 6. PUBLIC COMMENT—.(15 —20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Development Review Committee, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.) ITEM 7. ADJOURNMENT This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,.please contact-ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2306(voice)or 582-2301 (TDD). 2 5. Cattail Cree&ase 3 Annexation#A-04003 (SkeltoniSay) Davis Lane An Annexation Application to allow the annexation of 50.58±acres into the city. 6. Cattail Creek Phase 3 ZMA#Z-04035 (Skelton/Murray) Davis Lane a` A Zone Map Amendment Application to establish urban zoning classifications of R-1 (Single-Household, Residential District), R-2 (One-and Two-Household, Residential District), and R-3 (One-to Five-Household, Residential District)on 50.58±acres in conjunction with annexation. 7. Cattail Creek Phase 3 MaSub Pre-Ap#P-04008 (Skelton/Murray) Davis Lane * A Subdivision Pre-Application for the subdivision of 50.58±into 66 lots for R-1 (Single-Household, Residential District),R-2 (One—and Two-Household, Residential District), and R-3 (One- to Five-Household, Residential District) uses. ITEM 5. INITIAL WEEK REVIEW Gallatin Center PUD Mods#Z-04033 (Windemaker%Murray) ;o North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive * A request to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to allow an additional freestanding sign. 2. North Christy Park Neighborhood ZMA#Z-04029 (Sanford/Johnson) South Rouse Avenue, South Black Avenue,East Lincoln Street, East Garfield Street * A Zone Map Amendment Application to amend the City of Bozeman zoning map from R-3 (Residential, One- to Five-Household) to R-1 (Residential, Single- Household), affecting 118 residential lots. ITEM 6. PUBLIC COMMENT—(15 —20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Development Review Committee, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.) ITEM 7. ADJOURNMENT This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance,please contact-ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2306(voice)or 582-2301 (TDD). 2 • AGENDA • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CONFERENCE ROOM,ALFRED M. STIFF BUILDING,20 EAST OLIVE STREET TUESDAY,MARCH 16,2004 10:00 A.M ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE ITEM 2. PROJECT REVIEWS ITEM 3. FINAL WEEK REVIEW 1. Bozeman Office Express SP/COA/DEV#Z-04027 (Kozub/Stodola) 119 North 7 h Avenue * A Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness and Deviations to allow the construction of a 4,759 square foot, two-story addition to an existing structure for use as an office furniture store with related site improvements. 2. Courtyard Townhomes MiSub Prel. Plat#P-03030A (Kozub/Murray) 309 North Black Avenue A Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application to allow the subdivision of 0.4±acres into 5 residential townhome lots. (Final of a two week review.) 3. Courtyard Townhomes SP/COA#Z-03212A (Kozub/Murray) 309 North Black Avenue * A Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of 5 townhouse units and related site improvements. (Final of a two week review.) ITEM 4. SECOND WEEK REVIEW 1. The Aspens at Bridger Creek Annexation#A-04002(Saunders/Murray) Northeast corner of Story Mill Road and Boylan Road * An Annexation Application to allow the annexation of 20.12± into the city. 2. The Aspens at Bridger Creek ZMA #Z-04030(Saunders/Murray) Northeast corner of Story Mill Road and Boylan Road A Zone Map Amendment Application to establish urban zoning classifications of R-1 (Residential, Low Density District) and R-3 (Residential, Medium Density) on 20.12±acres in conjunction with annexation. 3. Cape-France/Home Depot Growth Policy Amendment#P-04007 (Sanford/Murray) Lot 4,Home Depot MiSub#319 * A Growth Policy Amendment Application to amend the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan from Residential and Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial on 33.97+ acres. 4. Cape-France/Home Depot ZMA#Z-04032(Sanford/Murray) Lot 4,Home Depot MiSub#319 * A Zone Map Amendment Application to amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map from R-3 (Residential, One- to Five-Household District) to B-2 (Community Business District) on 33.97± in conjunction with a Growth Policy Amendment. (OVER) 1 &Y OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, April 12, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Subdivision Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, requested by the applicant/owner, Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240, and represented by Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718. Said application would increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is zoned "B-2" (Community Business District) and "BP" (Business Park District) and is generally located west of North 19th between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. Written and verbal testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning and Community Development Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification. A.4 AV GATRON <` �t� R SU E P •PER+TY R- o. P -3 N -i ggME planning zoning subdivision review . annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination OY OF BOZEMAN 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI K Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, April 12, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Subdivision Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, requested by the applicant/owner, Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240, and represented by Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718. Said application would increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is zoned 11B-2" (Community Business District) and "BP" (Business Park District) and is generally located west of North 19th between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. Written and verbal testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning and Community Development Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification. GA.TRON <` t'e�s R R- Su P •PEwn R- a -1 planning zoning subdivision review . annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination &Y OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing. before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, April 12, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Subdivision Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, requested by the applicant/owner, Gallatin Center LP, 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380, Dallas, TX 75240, and represented by Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718. Said application would increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is zoned "B-2" (Community Business District) and "BP" (Business Park District) and is generally located west of North 19t" Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. Written and verbal testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning and Community Development Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification. SUBMITTED THURSDAY, 3/25/04 FOR SUNDAY, 3/28/04 DISPLAY AD PUBLICATION. PLEASE PRINT WITH NORTH ARROW UP, BOLD AS INDICATED, AND SEND AFFIDAVIT TO CITY PLANNING OFFICE. planning . zoning . subdivision review . annexation . historic preservation . housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination I CATRON R= 1� 3s iR`� �` SU BJE CT `��.' � W _ PROPER 1.6-to"Mar R-,. � �5-. k. � #"r•try�"`�'�ifl1,�� 3 1r �•zt�`' � t R-3 �2 CIF BOZEMAN �d ` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Skelton FROM: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Plann DATE: March 8, 2003 RE: Gallatin Center Modification to PUD, #Z-04033 I talked to Andy about this application and he said that you are the ADR staff on this project. He said that you had some distinct ideas about what the sign should look like. I need to have my report ready for the DRB on March 181h, so I need your comments before then. I look forward to having your input. Thanks! planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination x L FOP y GATRON R=3 � - SUB'E- R- E FFF a R-1 BAXTER R-3 B=2 Smooth Feed Sheets TM Use template for 51600 Gardner-Simmental Plaza S/D Avatar, LLC Boie &Kindt Partnership 1 Simmental Way 2059 Triple Tree Road 67 Hitching Post Road Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman MT 59715 Machinery Power&Equipment Co. MCPA Mass (TN) Associates Double S. Holding, LLC c/o W.P. Cary& Co. LLC 17035 W.Valley Hwy. 145 Rawhide Ridge Road Tukwila,WA 98188 50 Rockefeller Plaza, 2nd Floor Bozeman, MT 59718-7995 New York, NY 10020-1605 Gary T. Holkup T. F. P. Enterprises, LLC Montbill Corporation P.O. Box 104 3119 Augusta Drive P.O.Box 28606 Bozeman, MT 59771 Bozeman, MT 59715-8702 Atlanta, GA 30358-0606 SKA, Inc. Costco Wholesale Corp. Valley Center Enterprises LLC 630 E. Cottonwood 999 Lake Drive 2305 Catron Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Issaquah, WA 98027-8990 Bozeman, MT 59718-7261 Home Depot USA, Inc. Sandan LLC Bruce W. Campbell P.O. Box 105842 P.O. Box 1254 1163 Thomas Drive Atlanta, GA 30348-5842 Bozeman, MT 59771-1254 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 P. Andrew VanOrden P. Andrew VanOrden Richard L. Miller Debbie L. VanOrden Elizabeth Hager Larilyn L. Miller 1193 Thomas Drive I 1193 Thomas Drive 1242 Thomas Drive Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 I Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 William Louis James David Secor Brenda L. Burden Mardie Louis � Bonnie Lee Secor 1317 Thomas Drive 1265 Thomas Drive 2 1295 Thomas Drive Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Doreen J. Arneson, Revocable Ronald L. Davis Trust Cape-France Enterprises P.O. Box 2672 13314 N. High Meadows Drive 2220 W. Main St. Clackamas, OR 97015-2672 3314 a N. H SD Meadows D Bozeman, MT 59718-4002 BlackEugene Graf III R.G. Davis U.S.P.S. P.O. Box 906 13920 Thiesen Rd. 5711 Baxter Ln. East Bozeman, MT 59771-0906 Belgrade, MT 59714-8019 Bozeman, MT 59718 David W. Gaworski John A. Sheffield Vickie L. Surber Carol M. Gaworski Nancy Sheffield Gene W. Surber 1143 Thomas Dr. 1109 Thomas Dr. 1167 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 //� AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 5160® n� n� f n� Smooth Feed SheetsTM i Use template for 51600 Marcella Scheer Ervin Sukut I I Blair G. McGavin Alfred C. Scheer I Agnes Sukut 1 1013 Thomas Dr. 001 Thomas Dr. Bozeman,MT 59718-9737 I 1367 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 I I Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 rr .11 � ` Ir Qwet West LLC I i 125 W. Mendenhall St. it I , Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 I k II l II I it I . I Ij I III' I � II Ali I Ij I I � I Ali I I i I I ICI III I I � I ; AVERY@ Address-Label's I .Laser 5160® I I n� n� n� n� n� n� A�._M [/AA`` A.��yy PNI •PLANNING CO��""°�, P BT!• ,� �NT m •, 20 EAST E�9_.� � 25 NAR . P.O. BOA 12� 200K F r rp BOZEMAN, MT 59771 � Lko ou koi- a�VLe /� 0 A R. I_ Ervin Sukut I ; Agnes Sukut 1 1367 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 1 _ • - � �.�•��.1'�'�•1�...•J IiiF�lli�lliiFEliilii�!fliliifiF{if!!'liEEf!ifElliF�{SFIFlIS!I -o weren't sold on the idea. t Budke replaced Louisiana wo eded Minn 23- Tech icon Leon Barmore as nt tuber ret j 8 an coach Pam Borten,a coach before last season'He men's jersey former assistant to Inglr:se at laughs now when he recalls Duke coach Vermont and later with the telling friends he was leaving a Goestenkors said exp t Eagles. Texas community college to be- seems to be helping her ie Louisiana Tech,the*.rn come Barmore's top aide four far. lue Devils lost in the Athletic Conference champion, years ago. natiemifinals in-each of has already played two of the "People called me stupid and the last two years,giving Beard ,other top NCAA seeds this sea- called me crazy for following and fellow seniors Iciss Tillis son,losing 85-65 at Tennessee Leon,"he said,because Barmore and Vicki Krapohl one last and winning 87-84 at Penn had built a dynasty in the chance to win a national title. NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MODIFICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, ' April 12,2004 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall,411.East Main Street,Bozeman,Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider a modification to the approved Gallatin Center Subdivision Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development,requested by the applicant/owner,Gallatin Center LP,555.0 LBJ Freeway,Suite 380,Dallas,TX 75240,and represented by Allied Engineering,32 Discovery Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718. Said application would increase the number of allowable entryway pylon signs. The property is legally described as Gallatin Center Subdivision,City of Bozeman,Montana. The property is zoned°B-2"(Community Business District)and`BP"(Business Park District)and is generally located west of North 19th Avenue between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Drive. i I ? � Written and verbal testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may,be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning and r-- r Community Development Department,20 East Olive Street,582-2260. For those who require accommo- dations for disabilities,please contact Ron Brey,City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator,582-2306(voice), i i 582-2301(TDD). #Z-04033 Gallatin Center CUP for a PUD Modification. ,r9-2— Craig Parry Duffy Waldorf �� .•ice mties—Los Angeles Vijay Singh 70.68-72 Woody Austin 76-69.66 — 211 —Los Angeles,Huet 10-15-10 Paul Casey 72-7P69 — 211 two ,,....rs without paJ' 21 saves).Calgary,Kiprusoff 22- Bob Burns 67-72-72 — 211 Minnesota D F;lip Kuba in a Maid 25 dz,a. .,shots-27 saves). Padraig Harrington 68.70-73 — 211COi.ORADO AVALANCHE—Recalled RW -18,419(17,409).T--2:12. Tiger Woods 75-69.68 — 212 Dennis:Bonvie from Hershey of the AHL. Fred Funk 73-71-68 — 212 Assigned F Travis Brigley to Hershey. Montreal 1 1 0 0 — 2 Matt Kuchar .74.67-71 — 212 COLUMBUS BLUE JACKETS—Activated ..» Boston 0 1 1 1 — 3 Jeff Sluman 69.70-73 — 212 tislav Klesla from injured reserve. First Period— a ontreal,Ward 4 Glen Day 71-75.67 — 213 PA BAY LIGHTNING—Recalled C Eric (penalty shot),: Matt Gogel 72-71-70 — 213 rom Hershey of the AHL. Second Per; Montreal,Quintal 3 Tom Pernice,Jr. 72-71-70 — 213 ASHINGTON CAPITALS—Recalled D �,3arnett 7-14 3-3 (Ribeiro), 2:57. oston, Gonchar 11 Sergio Garcia 68-73-72 — 213 Jakub Cutta from Portland of the AHL. 2,Hassell 4-4 1-2 9, (Samsonov,Knuble),11:39(pp). Cameron Beckman 70-71-72 — 213 COLLEGE 15,Hoiberg 1-3 5.5 7, Third Period-4,Boston,Samsonov 13 Alex CeJka 69-71-73 — 213 KANSAS—Named Bonnie Henrickson J 10,Madsen 1.2 0.0 2, (Boynton,Bergeron),1:41. women's basketball coach. e team sponsor in the asked to respond to one question in panion,Yogi Berra,asking him to snap i News Bears." Spanish.Several of the Yankees on the the picture. plenty of other shirts on dais laughed,wondering if the excel- "I thought that was priceless.It was .park concession stands, lent interpreter would be able to trans- absolutely priceless,"Torre said. s'merchandise dominated late the Spanish into Japanese—she In the evening,players from both argin.Jeter,Alex wasn't. teams attended a reception that fea- id Jason Giambi T-shirts Showing the cultural differences, tured many,along with commissioner ienuine—but not au- Torre pointed out the Yankees were ap- Bud Selig,donning"happi"coats and nkees and Devil Rays jer- plauded by the Japanese media while breaking sake barrels with baseball bats, 6.82,and team jackets cost the New York press crew sat silently. not the traditional hammers. General manager Brian Cashman was On Sunday morning,Torre and )reboard,videos were introduced as a member of the Yankees' Cashman traveled by Blackhawk heli- Yankees'players saying partnership—he wishes he owned coptet to Camp Zama along with Jorge (hello)"to the fans.All stock! Posada,Ruben Sierra,Gabe White and se phrases except Matsui, "That was just a little something ex- Joe Girardi. ,ig was in English. tra for the Christmas stocking,"Torre "This is one of the great events of Low international the joked. the year,"U.S.Army Maj.Gen.Nick :ome,the Yankees'news At breakfast,a fan who wanted a Perkins said."It just makes you tingle iclude three languages— photo of himself and Torre handed his all over to stand with Joe Torre in the Id Mariano Rivera were camera to the manager's dining com- pinstripes.' 09L dOZEMAN ' , I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net March 1, 2004 Gallatin Center LP 5550 LBJ Freeway, Suite 380 Dallas, TX 75240 t Re: Gallatin Center Modifications of CUP for PUD (#Z-04033) Dear Sirs: Your application for Modifications to the Gallatin Center CUP for PUD approval on property located on North 191h Avenue, between Baxter Lane and Valley Center Road has been received and assigned to Contract Planner Lanette Windemaker. The application has been reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklist and appears to meet the submittal requirements. However, please understand that during the course of review there may be items identified or issues, which need to be addressed. Should that occur, Planner Windemaker will contact you. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will be reviewing your application on three separate occasions and the Design Review Board (DRB) will review the application once. Staff recommends that you and/or your representative attend the second and third DRC meetings to be held on Tuesdays, March 23rd and 30`i', 2004, at 10:00 a.m. and the DRB meeting Tuesday, March 23rd at 3:30 p.m. to answer any questions that may arise. All DRC and DRB meetings are held in the-Conference Room at the Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street. Agendas will be sent to you and your representative to remind you of the dates and times of these meetings. The final decision will be made by the City Commission on Monday, April 12, 2004, at 7:00 p.m., 411 East Main Street at City Hall in the Commission Meeting Room. If you have any further questions regarding the process or your project in general, please contact Planner Windemaker at 586-5266. Sincerely, Carol L. Schott Administrative Secretary Enc. CLS/cls cc: Allied Engineering, 32 Discovery Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 planning . zoning . subdivision review • annexation . historic preservation . housing . grant administration neighborhood coordination f.' • � s 277 ' L City of Bozeman Receipt 74 o Bozeman, Montana _el . , 20 � p /} Received ofX.CJ��" /1 Ul,c�!�1.2/f h tin' ff �4 Aln/nJ tiC,e�1 l�1•�'L!�-' the sum of -Q for 'l. lJU)�:�.C_tu u UiC B✓►t /l�i�-l. 3 97 By (� Y , �.. . . CITY R . DO/EMAN RgRG S2f mlma# FND UNITED yQ #m,m ISMS m CHECK #6.m Check# 13979 Date: 02/24/2004 • Amount: $660.00 Vendor ID: CITY Payee: City of Bozeman Address: P.O.Box 640 Bozeman,MT 59771 Notes: City of Bozeman-P D Modification Review Fee,2/24/04 03-242.1 "F BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 ��„ 20 East Olive Street _ (�� f� faxl4.0`6=5:8'-2263 "� P.O. Box 1230 R ICE C LL-planningla bl'zed I lan.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net F E B 2 4 2004 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATIO CDAOTRACA1T QE 01 ANINMIG 1.Name of Project/Development C1 ALLATI N CGN TE 2 ANO rW.'1:'i1'IITY DEVEWFOENT 2. Property Owner Information: Name: C A(,,L A 7"N CCN T&A- L. P E-mail Address: Mailing Address: SSSO L 3 J CA- 41 5ui rE 3 8c 4)9 CCA-$ 7-k 75-o?qO FAX: 977, Phone: 972- e/ 900 3.Applicant Information: Name: �j r4u�c -3 A.tsovc E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: 411jeo L—N6-�/NEE(L E-mail Address: Mailing Address: 3 2 �i SLo�FR t �/�, o �Cr'�r4� 1Y T S4 T/6 Phone: ,S'g 2-O Z 2/ FAX: 5 e 2-S-7 7,o 5.Legal Description: C7 H Le-*4 T/A CCA1 TC/Z SCA,!j/.��v� /,0 V 6. Street Address: A/D.RTlf /9 t� 15, _1! �N ��4y T�V- G,9,1� 'b Ui4 C�N��� 7. Project Description: T REq ccE9i f4 rHI AO 516.Ay Fv.0 C r4L�,r4ri�v Ccrn rc� 8. Zoning Designation(s): b'Z ©p 9. Current Land Use(s): �i D.vNE�Gi.A� .6 />6i�1 G�fitai9t 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: ��'Uiprl Co.�N�.lZG�v9c //,us.,Ness 17 Page 1 C PIC, G r 11. Gross Area: Acres: tll 6f Square Feet:6/170, 27� 12. Net Area Acres: /�93 t,-Square Feet:4631, y36 13. Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? JN Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation " Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ®R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan 14 oPt FICATMA( ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑ E. Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T. Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F. Sketch Plan/COA ❑ U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ®I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X. Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ,(1K. Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z. Zoning Variance ❑'L. Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑ M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB. Growth Policy Text Amendment c ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 81/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different) before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and/or property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development, approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I (We) hereby certify that the above informati and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date:,, Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Ovrner's Signature: -Date: Property Owner's Signat re: Date: Property Ovaner's S ature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application-Prepared 11/25/03) SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 0 These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Does the proposal one or more of the following: Yes No 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ E 30,000 or more square feet of office space,retail commercial space;service commercial space or industrial ® ❑ space More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses,permitted retail commercial uses,permitted ❑ service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ Parking for more than 60 vehicles [� ❑ B. General Information. General Information Yes No N/A Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ ❑ A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel ❑ ❑ to and from the site. The route shall avoid,where possible,local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety Boundary line of property with dimensions \,i o m ❑ ❑ Date of plan preparation and changes 0 ❑ ❑ North point indicator ER ❑ ❑ Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ N Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet 14 ❑ ❑ Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio,FAR),with a ❑ ❑ E) breakdown by land use Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following. Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ , parks,school sites,etc. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ Total number,type and density per type of dwelling units,and total net and gross residential density ❑ ❑ and density per residential parcel Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each The information required by '18.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless such El E) j information was previously provided through a subdivision review process,or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed, or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal • of a preliminary site plan application Description and mapping of soils existing on the site,accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of ❑ ❑ (� such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 1 Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03) Building design information(on-site): Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall ❑ ❑ when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or ❑ ❑ construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with '18.78.0501 L BMC(Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC (Supplementary ❑ ❑ 5Q Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated:- Site Plan Information Yes No N/A Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Planning Director ❑ ❑ Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to major ® ❑ ❑ arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet On-site streets and rights-of-way ® ❑ ❑ Ingress and egress points ® ❑ ❑ Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ Traffic flow off-site ❑ ❑ Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: Electric ❑ ❑ Natural gas ❑ ❑ 21 Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ 12 Water ❑ ❑ Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ Surface water,including- Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands [M ❑ ❑ Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ .® identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis,topographic survey or other objective and factual basis A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58,BMC(Bozeman Floodplain ❑ ❑ ,® Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality ❑ ❑ improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways,reservoirs, etc.which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated:- Ile name of the drainageway(where appropriate) 14 ❑ ❑ The downstream conditions(developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ PQ Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ N Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic ❑ ❑ a features Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details and ❑ ❑ interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict Page 4 Provision for handicapped acWMW, including but not limited to, wheelchMMF-aWW, parking ❑ ❑ spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ C4 Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for [� ❑ ❑ compliance with Chapter 18.52, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ A site plan, complete with all structures, parking spaces, building entrances, traffic areas (both [� ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with lighting,and adjacent uses,containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in '18.78.060.R,BMC (Lighting Plan),if not previously provided Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ X Landscaping - detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information as ❑ ❑ required in 118.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required, complete section C below. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and ❑ ❑ shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ Location of City limit boundaries, and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ Historic,cultural and archeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or ❑ ❑ (� districts,and archeological or cultural sites Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the properly ❑ ❑ owner and the person preparing the plan Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑ ❑ Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse setbacks,and the location of ❑ ❑ 21 any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines, driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ ❑ Location, height and material of proposed screening and fencing (with berms to be delineated by ❑ ❑ one foot contours) Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer strips ❑ ❑ Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan,including ❑ ❑ typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and ❑ ❑ [O loading areas, including information as to the amount (in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from damage ❑ ❑ R] during construction Size, height, location and material of proposed seating, lighting, planters, sculptures, and water ❑ ❑ features A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ Page 5 Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ Tabulation of points earned by the plan-see '18.48.060,BMC(Landscape Performance Standards) ❑ ❑ Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ 12 Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ El Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage ❑ ❑ control Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ M Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ 0 Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ M Planting plan for watercourse buffers, per 118.42.100, BMC (Watercourse Setbacks), if not [I ❑ [] previously provided through subdivision review Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not otherwise ❑ ❑ �'] provided by the application.Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 00 00 ............. Letter of Transmittal ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. TO: CAko(- —7� Date: C1 TAP OF 1)o;ZE✓-rIAM Allied Job Number: 6 Attention: Re: We Are Sending You Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Via the following items: t: Shop Drawing ❑ Prints ❑ Plans Samples ❑ . Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order Copies Date Description j� n z�2 V• I�Ev(ew ��t�A Pl G�417b►v �G G EL < �,r�" - o.Ll!mot THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For Approval For Your Use ❑ As Requested ❑ For Review&Comments Reviewed as Corrected 0 Approved as Noted ❑ For Your File ❑ Submit specified item ❑ Revise&Resubmit ._ Copy To: rl� -_ Signed: GCS 32 Discovery Drive ♦ Bozeman, MT 59718 ♦ (406) 582-0221 ♦ Fax(406) 582-5770 4 ' Developer Tract �m�� �` Target Tract 0 — ,,.Y ■iTa+«�■ - N 00133'47* 'a7'f 6' 9 OO7J'A7�v 95.20 'ar----'- ----- ----J------ _ I I '' s'waErc-- EASEMENT- _ ___ _ ---------_, ' faCi to Lot8) ,— --------- 7 lui __J / L- ------------ -- ------ ®m"— -� ) Total Site Area 472,451 sf-10.85 acres ggl: Pftary Building Area Future P rd Access Pedestrian ---- ' ----- ---------------- _ ate /tl� DiscourdRetail 123,40esf Parldn /X1'r I ;I b Bullding A ea i t - aoc�ess area =c Area A wcr I Park nil h�rnm 574 cars 4.65E 1000sf 1•De-Sac Tempaery Drive E But"- c ---------- =---I Tract lb Lot 9) .. Total Site Area 269,917sf-6.19 acres =I Garden z m " z I Target I - Tenant 25,500sf Center Major Tenant - 1 123,408 sf 1 - , O Tanantz 30,601sf �I I - 108,003sf 4 Tenant 1 Tetiant,71 I I Total Retell 56301d ml - - 25,500sf 30,801 sf I I _ ' 21,984sf 129 987Sf Total I ;�; Max.Wkfing Height I I s �. . 1It Parknig Required 329 cars >J Max.Build nil Helgiu 37 LIAW DOW Retail 2D0, Max.Building Height 37 I � � �J Parldn9 Shown 330 cars 114 41Y I I I} I ` - Pet Shop � COMMERCIA �1 Trect1C(�t1o) --- I Totat Site Area 557,174sf-12.79 acres -IJP LAW + - - PNo Major Tenant 129,987sf s;o - nl"1,,,,,,I,^ —2 j Retail 4,200sf IUNI I+IG'4I+1'+I ICI"+aUl m I nil - t Total Retail 134,187sf PamruiI I ea I �cars COSTCO SITE Tractz(Lot,2) i I I r t I I u I I n Total Site Area 222,874sf-5.12H*H aces - i $ i )11 ftj o i Motel(footprvH area) 29,952sf s7 I I Total Site Area) 596,609sf-13.70 acres y III _ ;m11 � Major Tenet 81,7955f Tenant 2 25,976sf t R j >_ 1 r _ &pau I E. r II I Retail 20,917sf /--- w N Total Retail 128,68Bsf fizo.79 s7o. 1/ Parldnig Required 643 cars ( __ r Parking Shown 643 cars - ---------- a7t-l•tven�e'------------- - ao.07- n•——,—i .——•— — —— = � ParT�l t Lr lTll / -----—-—-—-—-—- In __--______ 26'PVaUC uT1UTY h 4DEwALK ACC S E Ear+T— zs'r--v- fa6MENT © 1(Lot 3) - -------- ------; P / W LOfaaI ------ 1 r26'PU6V0�-rt aN0 9DEWALI: 211 .« t P f r ct / / / Total Site Area 71,944sf-1.65 acres vs - I / ap'STREAM CORROOR SO'STREAM OORra — — sO S7REAM RO _ I �— ^ . f ---- m / I I I I T1 'Parcel 2(Lot 4) - r --------- -- -- - (L$el lJ I I I IJ I I I IJ I I I IJ I I I IJ I I I fI +-+� I 44 Total Site Area 95,507sf-2.19 acres F. I i I I I I f2 res I I �. :.. ..._... � m l i"i i 0000ws hr _ I s / .. Parcel (L nant 3I I I I II Total Site Area 85, 67sf-1.97 acres Maj Te m :,N I 81,79 f e ems• I a I /•/ Ferrel 4(Lot 6) m Im ay-Buildi �, _ / j ro cA�6 Total Site Area 33,036sf-0.76 acres E Building Area 55 I 1 I I I III I I 30'I ` — \k \' IOU IO m Ig v ing I I I / 7 \ Parcel 5(Lot 7) 1 6 > Total Site Area 91-2.26 acres NCI y Tenant 2 i I =1= r I 25,976sfye ��r Sf 7- 1 1 I 1 Retail ~1 20,917sf II Not Pa oF�a a o a I _11WI11111 iiiiii I I ti 5 ;• 746ff fOA�" eX'PE EASEMENT Entryway T ---ale{ I 1 I „' ;,, � nterch _ _ Pylon Sign i/ 4 Pyi g 6 _ _ -- _ _un Irr �LiV , tS I r 3'W 306.86' _%===_=c _ _____ L� `11C LEA Mr --- 5 ' I re o � -_ -,- �/ g Project:9667 - - `so / I Sign ' File: 2001-15-i-e3 c i 7. ._..... _rr C7 PUBUC OR6�p WAY BOOR '' �__Y,� m ''E emegt Date: 1111611998 sorlo'ssw r'-r Scale: 1'=100' . _ ._.. -- -- ... +e�sst _ ' rat '� Developer Tract / �9 i DevelTfa- = r. 1 North i 5 CaaanoaNu - _ _ / Y°+a•.r 'M fafCilTte - 1 1F '., fir�ti, ? A_ eT k g I NORTH I9N Am !1_L.9f Kf o ' atSPe 36 ItaoaeQe Anar.ee I�maupa i�, NVtodial Ste Mel She Emomart eye owe6 Ian Oho Plae Nee C. Ama ascmvt 1i •',{� .' i-`"i o z Bozeman rran a Q..Q 61 A72ASI Q f0.05 Belt[ a7,7a5 9 a2f,7a6 R off 434,7m of M 19x f `.Kn,�cp-\'!4'= ,$,•L:.r'.r ' o, rra¢to Qd 9J 269,917 9 6As arms 26,695 9 249=6f oaf 2asu 9 11,56 oa it Q Q I0) W.94 9 12.79 aces $,�9 —.790 of 0 9 Sm,790 9 29e1% Trart3 00111 59M.6746.09 if 3.12 ours A.910 9 2fn,9M 9 21,23E or 179A10 of 311 '?-'."P"--: iM'�.-+• rrart3 1 p 696,669>r n.7fl Boas 6s,6+s a sa,s9a 9 4,,s76 9 am,a,e 9 as, aIlatn enter7Puml2 (L&a) 71yfa/ I.65— 09 71,9a u 21,6599 M,rai 9 3 ��hibi 3 North 19th Avenue 86 Valley Center RoadParrtl2 pn a) 93,07 or 1.19 acesff asAT of ,3 US 9 73,61a 9 aSI�A Vicinity Map Panala (EH6) a6.0% I.79 16,T699 33,pe9 1a=9 66,1869 ii Pusd pa 61 t1,af6 0 6.79 asps o 9 a,rnfi 9 0 9 39,696 9 16716 R f._•-Ft- � Bozeman, Montana ratb iw,o,of a?— antler sr 2a1A7a o lnae at y1mAn 4 .. v e rt rMrMTTrmr� -.__. .nl� trI'11�ii1TIlUiTi1(ITI��ll++��i{�+il�.l \ GALLATIN CENTER •=..ri ��+++++i}+Ie�111�UnI, PHASE'1` \ GALLATI. CENTER PUD Ill COSTCO '3.05 ACRES H(nIIllI ti, \ (�+IIII?IIH;1 J MINORSU8210 TIT GTTT91 i n--._.__!• 0++�+NNtNiii7� RES \ / LOT2 ]S78 AC ) /rr 7 ` =MINOR SUB 210 _ I GATE �'• ,\ �`\ •\ T_ = LOT �..- .\WIN ._� ,GALLATIN CENTER PUD _ aT.I]A]I ACRE9 PHASE I-LOT 2 2.78 ACRES i �111U.1110LLtU111N.DL1!lltLLUll!L?1Ui11LLN.U!!!1i11.11i11!LiL1 - - - - - -.1'- _ CATRON STREET ..-n1fTli(Il?IiPlimTilfl'rU ialrri-ow iTI firm ' \\ ++++++H#+f+tNi#+ftHi{{{{fgiii++f+'�iii++4Nf� ' GALLATINCENTERPUD PHASE I-LOTS G.C.PUD 1.97 ACRES I :. gg(t�1�lUl 11yy aa�� �LLyy PHASE LOT 7 NOT TO SCALE LOT 7 �� GALLATIN CENTER PUD � .I 2.26 ACRE "' I PHASEI-LOTS ' a G.C.PUD GALLATIN CENTER PUD EXISTING INTERCHANGE P I 10.85 ACRES I PHASEI HASEI-LOT4 2.19 ACRES PYLON SIGN LOCATION I S l I "I�iiTfTll11"TRT;Tig i�illl,��o T 10.76 ACRES ,{ TARGET STORE , l I t . 11// It IItt'''' ���� �1�1H1 gg ALLAAS I-LOT PU4 ii +1++RN-&+++IPi+�++t11T+++9 - PHASE C LOT J II I, 1 , 1.65 ACRES I I EXISTING ENTRYWAY PYLON SIGN LOCATION 25 iBOB WARD'S GALLATIN HASE 111.LOT 9 PUD _ _ GALLATIN ATIN CENTER PUD- PHA 1 - SE 11•LOT E' C e' GALI I IN CENTER PUD ]30 ACRES ' 9.97 A ........ ...? .-_ o i "< PHASE11-LOT 9.1 Irl�(TQifIfA IIIII ITT 1.69 ACRES PE ISMRT - I nn BUILDING I •;I I ICHAEL BORDERS BUILDING IIEi�l1 lH�I++$Nflff+f BUILDING LOT 12 11.111 (~ BUILDING 1t i +17.]0.c]e \ ,BUILDING 1 I 1 1 \ BUILDING IN Iljjl�lp(jJl)lltlp LOTH !Illl 1r111 0(IllliTf111 8.61 acres 1 I PROPOSED ENTRYWAY BUILDING _ PYLON SIGN LOCATION „ I---BUILDING1 I CATTAILSTRELrI' L 90'A/\V DEAD MANS — GULCH LOT IS � — 1.28 acres LOT 16 LOT 14 LOT U 0.8t ocres 0.98 acres 1.38 acres LOT 18 LOT 17 I 1 4.04 acres 3.76 acres \\\ I \ I I I I i i 3 I I PROPOSED WEST CATRON I CREEK RELOCATION I I i' > ROLFE PROPERTY 1 NOT PART OF GALLATIN CENTER I I tl 1, LOT 19 8.88 ACRES i z I I ' I 1 , I I i I I I I I i I I I — — — I 1 • — ——-——-— I I 1 I a i Iz ; FUTURE ENTRYWAY — i PYLON SIGN LOCATION REMAMNG AAEA 49.8 ACRES: L � I I T I I -T----- ------ IPOST OPPICE I I I I I Civil Engineering ,]olswvrxT oslve Exhibit 2 BAXTER LANE /' L a Irma Surveying Ba7BMAN,MT]9]I. DRAWN BY. CGB ® ]s I5 5E ALLIED I Geolechnicel Engineering ^1O^c1 0615°1-01t' wo<c]w o:-,ma ENOINERRINO Structarnl Engineering rAx t.mlle]a]m ® ]ss ]s sE DATE: 02/23/04 o n-oust OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 CI 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montano 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. Name of Project/Development: G A LL A TI N CC N re 2 2. Property Owner Information: E-mail Address: Name: C�AC,c.,4 r i N CEn! Te k L a Mailing Address: $"SSO L 3 v 38v 7-k 75^a y0 Phone: 972- 0/40- �o, 4,: FAX: 97,7 c19o- S/9A� 3.Applicant Information: Name: S r4"e A,5006 E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: �I p ��/�(C�/N E-mail Address: Mailing Address: 3 2 015Go O--X f Phone: J-'q?-OLZI FAX: 5-02-5 77o 5. Legal Description: C-7 H Lc.a T/h CEA'TC/Z . ix &4/v/3/opV 6. Street Address: Ale A nt 9 f� JSE'TU-�-C.V 66 y T L-V- C&N 47. Project Description: T ,eEQ Lc,,,i /4 Th`/,t a EN T.'1 `� wpx-V PY<-o.c( 5/(9a/ / 04 C► -ter/nc Cer� 7c� 8. Zoning Designation(s): (j Z P 9. Current Land Use(s): 46�416'u/f'tAk 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: �CU/or1 i9L �.oK �.Rc�v9c /�cesiv �3 /�Q/G Page 1 11. Gross Area: Acres: f f Square Feet:6//70, 27 12.Net Area: Acres: /293*,,Square Feet:,r 13. Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No, go to question 14 13a. Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation Entryway Corridor 14. Will this application require a deviation(s)? Ef Yes �-,o 7?0.d. ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A. Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑ P.Planned Unit Development-Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site Q.Planned Unit Development-Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 Planned Unit Development-Master Plan p ,pi FICATied ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E. Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F. Sketch Plan/COA ❑ U. Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G. Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V. Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ®I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment '3('K. Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z. Zoning Variance ❑L. Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑ M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,ad)oiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 81/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and/or property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terns and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We) hereby certify that the above informati and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date-.,.pw, Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signa e: Date: Property Owner's S ature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application-Prepared 11/25/03) t � SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Does the proposal one or more of the following: Yes No 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 9 30,000 or more square feet of office space,retail commercial space;service commercial space or industrial ® ❑ space More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses,permitted retail commercial uses,permitted ❑ service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ Parking for more than 60 vehicles N ❑ B. General Information. General Information Yes No N/A Location,map,including area within one-half mile of the site N ❑ ❑ List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ ❑ A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel ❑ ❑ N to and from the site. The route shall avoid,where possible,local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety Boundary line of property with dimensions \N O O i Nl E u 5 l v c�tS 19 ❑ ❑ Date of plan preparation and changes N ❑ ❑ North point indicator 0 ❑ ❑ Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ N Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio,FAR),with a ❑ ❑ breakdown by land use Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following: Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ (� Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ N . parks,school sites,etc. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ Total number,type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential density ❑ ❑ IN density per residential parcel Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, 21 ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each The information required by '18.78.060.J, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless such ❑ ❑ information was previously provided through a subdivision review process,or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed., or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application Description and mapping of soils a cist n.g on the site,accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of ❑ ❑ such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03) 1 ` A Building design information(on-site): Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ K Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall ❑ ❑ when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or ❑ ❑ construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with ' 18.78.0501-i,BMC(Noxious Weed Management and Revegeration Plan) Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72,BMC (Supplementary ❑ ❑ t4 Documents) C Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated:- Site Plan Information Yes No N/A Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Planning Director ❑ ❑ Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent to major ® ❑ ❑ arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet On-site streets and rights-of-way IN ❑ ❑ Ingress and egress point IN ❑ ❑ Traffic flow on-site ❑ 1 ❑ Traffic flow off-site ❑ I ❑ Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: Electric ❑ ❑ Natural gas ❑ ❑ Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ Water ❑ ❑ 91 Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ Surface water,including: Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches CRI ❑ ❑ Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands 0 ❑ ❑ Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rare Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100 year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis,topographic survey or other objective and factual basis A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58,BMC(Bozeman Floodplain ❑ ❑ ,® Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention detention and water quality ❑ ❑ improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc.which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) 14 ❑ ❑ The downstream conditions(developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ 2Q Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic ❑ ❑ features Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including rypical details and ❑ ❑ interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict Page 4 t Provision for handicapped acce ility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ps, parking ❑ ❑ spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ Q� Exterior signs. Note- The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for [� ❑ ❑ compliance with Chapter 18.52, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ A site plan, complete with all structures, parking spaces, building entrances, traffic areas (both [4 ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in '18.78.060Y,BMC (Lighting Plan),if not previously provided- Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ [�] Landscaping - detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information as ❑ ❑ required in 118.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required, complete section C below. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and El ❑ shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species IV Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ tO Location of City limit boundaries, and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ 0 Historic,cultural and archeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or ❑ ❑ districts,and archeological or cultural sites Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. I ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the property ❑ ❑ (�f owner and the person preparing the plan Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑ ❑ Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse setbacks,and the location of ❑ ❑ any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines, driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ I ❑ Location, height and material of proposed screening and fencing (with berms to be delineated by ❑ ❑ �] one foot contours) Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer strips ❑ ❑ Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan,including ❑ ❑ (91 typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and ❑ ❑ [� loading areas, including information as to the amount (in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from damage ❑ ❑ kJ during construction Size, height, location and material of proposed seating, lighting, planters, sculptures, and water ❑ ❑ features A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ Page 5 Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ [>� Tabulation of points earned by the plan- see '18.48.060,BMC(Landscape Performance Standards) ❑ ❑ Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ 91 Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage ❑ ❑ control Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ 0 Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ M Planting plan for watercourse buffers, per 118.42.100, BMC (Watercourse Setbacks), if not ❑ ❑ 9 previously provided through subdivision review Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not otherwise ❑ ❑ Z provided by the application.Show open stairways and other projections from merior building walls Page 6 GALLA TIN CENTER SIGNA GE Gallatin --Structural steel frame dad with duminum Cen ter pcnzls 10_2. Major Conventional Internally Tenant Illuminated sign cabinets 0 TARGET #1 Major Tenant#1 Major Major Tenant Tenant Major Tenant #2t3 Major Tenant#3 Bo sq.ft. of Ta ' allowable i Major Tenant sign area Major Tenant#5 1 o I I I N Metcl grill: color I ( I to match retail CLU bcse 32 sq.fL of 32 sq.fL of - Tenant signoge area signage erec I Address J . .r . smooth face Smooth face T-ant Tenant color integral o Tenant ader mtegrol Lest ccr.Crete base AM—I f emu in Address/ emu �..::� _ •�. Z_ "•- -;�r:_...� split-fete colcr split-face color integral enu integral anu Last concrete base o fV lV � 1 2'-4• I 5'-10' 2-4' I 14'_4• l lq' SIGNTARGA r Re: stG�:AGDaG Dga: ab'L'.98 Bask of Signage Area t s1.6 V4-I' 4 E � PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PA Multi-tenant Single Tenant Entryway Corridor Interchange Monument sign Monument sign Pylon sign Pylon sign ] a.ua,.-rsae rxae MULTI-TENANT no stele SINGLE TENANT no scale no scale no stole MORRISON 0 MAIERLE,INC. �"y PA 8.Ins CI T 4duq 9.d r=(us)ser-Ins REVISION DATE: 6/26/9a REVISION DAM DRAWN BY: CWW/BLF DATE 9/4/97 2393/OO6/FREPLAT/S+c/SGNAC- CHEUM BY: TIIH DRA'hiNG NO_ JOB NO, 2393/006/0310 SHOT T � 1 Adjoiners List CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, C h QI 5 G. , hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners within 200 feet of the property located at CQALLATiN CCNT64 , is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Signature (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List—Prepared 11/20/03) Smooth Feed Sheets TM • � Use template for 51600 Gardner-Simmental Plaza S/D Avatar, LLC Boie &Kindt Partnership 1 Simmental Way 2059 Triple Tree Road 67 Hitching Post Road Bozeman, MT 59718 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman MT 59715 Machinery Power&Equipment Co. MCPA Mass (TN) Associates Double S. Holding, LLC c/o W.P. Cary & Co. LLC 17035 W. Valley Hwy. 145 Rawhide Ridge Road Tukwila, WA 98188 50 Rockefeller Plaza, 2nd Floor Bozeman, MT 59718-7995 New York,NY 10020-1605 Gary T. Holkup T. F. P. Enterprises, LLC Montbill Corporation P.O. Box 104 3119 Augusta Drive P.O. Box 28606 Bozeman, MT 59771 Bozeman, MT 59715-8702 Atlanta, GA 30358-0606 SKA, Inc. Costco Wholesale Corp. Valley Center Enterprises LLC 630 E. Cottonwood 999 Lake Drive 2305 Catron Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Issaquah, WA 98027-8990 Bozeman, MT 59718-7261 Home Depot USA, Inc. Sandan LLC Bruce W. Campbell P.O. Box 105842 P.O. Box 1254 1163 Thomas Drive Atlanta, GA 30348-5842 Bozeman, MT 59771-1254 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 P. Andrew VanOrden P. Andrew VanOrden Richard L. Miller Debbie L. VanOrden Elizabeth Hager Larilyn L. Miller 1193 Thomas Drive 1193 Thomas Drive 1242 Thomas Drive Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 William Louis James David Secor Brenda L. Burden Mardie Louis Bonnie Lee Secor 1317 Thomas Drive 1265 Thomas Drive 1295 Thomas Drive Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Ronald L. Davis Doreen J. Arneson, Revocable Cape-France Enterprises P.O. Box 2672 Trust 2220 W. Main St. Clackamas OR 97015-2672 13314 N. High Meadows Drive Bozeman MT 59718-4002 ' Blackhawk, SD 57718-9013 ' Eugene Graf III R.G. Davis U.S.P.S. P.O. Box 906 13920 Thiesen Rd. 5711 Baxter Ln. East Bozeman, MT 59771-0906 Belgrade, MT 59714-8019 Bozeman, MT 59718 David W. Gaworski John A. Sheffield Vickie L. Surber Carol M. Gaworski Nancy Sheffield Gene W. Surber 1143 Thomas Dr. 1109 Thomas Dr. 1167 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 �9 AVERY@ Address Labels Laser 51600 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 51600 Marcella Scheer Blair G. McGavin Ervin Sukut Alfred C. Scheer 1013 Thomas Dr. Agnes Sukut 1001 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 1367 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 Qwet West LLC 125 W. Mendenhall St. Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 /II AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® l Application and Check List GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVISION APPLICATION Prepared by: ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 32 Discovery Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone (406) 582-0221 Fax (406) 582-5770 FEBRUARY, 2004 J.O. 03-242.1 Introduction > t PUD Signage Guidelines 2. FREESTAND G SIGNAGE GUIDELINES A. GENERAL: All free standing signs should complement the appearance and function of adjacent roadways and the entryway corridors while protecting the unique views beyond the corridor. The purpose of free-standing signage guidelines related to the Gallatin Center Development is to promote signage designs which are: 1. Compatible with surroundings, expressive of the identity of individual properties and sensitive to the goals for the design and character of the Entryway corridors of Bozeman. 2. Orderly and appropriate to the activity to which they pertain; related to the place where the activity represented is located. 3. Non-distracting to motorists. 4. Aesthetically pleasing. While these standards are intended to enhance the overall quality and aesthetic appearance of this.project, it is important that these standards maintain and convey the intent of the City of-Bozeman's standard signage ordinance as summarized in section 18.65.100 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. B. PROHIBITED SIGNS: The following signs are prohibited: Any sign which: Imitate or resemble any official traffic sign, signal or device; Consists of banners, pennants, ribbons, streamers, strings or light bulbs and spinners; except during a holiday season, or for ethnic and thematic events. Is in any.way animated (including twinkling or wind-activated movable parts), emits smoke, visible vapors, particles, sound or odor, or rotates or moves in any manner. Has flashing lights incorporated as part of its design and performance. Use lights which are not effectively shielded as to prevent beams or rays of light from being directed at any portion.of the traveled ways and which are of such brilliance as to cause glare or to impair the vision of the driver of any motor vehicle or otherwise interfere with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle. - Is portable: fixed on a movable stand; self-supporting without being firmly embedded in the ground; supported by other objects; mounted on wheels or movable vehicle; or made 7 easily movable in any manner. Is located (painted, affixed, etc.) on trees, rocks or other natural features. Is an off-premise sign, referring to a business or merchant not doing business on the premise where the sign is displayed. Overhangs the right-of-way or property line: - Is a free-standing or projecting sign which does.not comply with the following guidelines. C. FREESTANDING SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES The Gallatin Center Development poses a unique opportunity to define and insure appropriate, quality design standards for free standing signage. This guideline separates freestanding signage into two categories; pylon signs and monument signs. Conceptual drawings of the proposed pylon and monument signs are shown in the following drawings. The first indicates shows the family of proposed signs. The second shows the signs proposed for the Target application. The proposed locations for the pylon signs are shown on the following map. 1. PYLON SIGN—INTERCHANGE ZONE One pylon sign may be erected on Valley Center Road to a height not to exceed thirty- five feet. Total allowable area shall be a maximum of one hundred square feet. Pylon _ freestanding signs shall be set back a minimum of fifteen feet and will maintain al least an ten feet minimum vertical clearance. There are no allowances for additional size. 2. PYLON SIGNS—ENTRYWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT Two signs may be erected along North 19`h Avenue. The first at the intersection of the roadway intersecting 19`h and bordering Phase I and Phase II. The second may be erected at any point along the frontage of North 19`h Avenue directly in front of Phase IV. Each sign may not exceed a height of twenty-five feet. Reference site plan and Exhibit A. Total allowable area shall be a maximum of ninety (90) square feet for directories with four or more tenants and sixty (60) square feet for three tenants or less. Pylon freestanding signs shall be set back a minimum of fifteen feet and will maintain al least an eight feet minimum vertical clearance. There are no allowances for additional size. 3. MONUMENT SIGNS Monument signs for single property users shall be permitted along the frontage of each property. Each monument sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet.in area,nor five (5) feet in height, and must be setback a minimum of five (5) from the property lines. All monument signs may identify the single business with name and/or logo only and must display the street number address in figures which are at least four and a half(4-1/2) 8 inches high for largerOIns and three (3) inches for smaller sign Monument signs for multi-property users shall be permitted at each secondary entrance of the Gallatin Center Project, provided each sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area, nor seven (7) in height, and must be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from the property lines. All monument signs shall only identify the complex and must display the street number address in figures which are at least three (3) inches high. (See the following drawings for examples of signage types proposed for this project.) — — — — — - ...... —;_ ----------------------------------- t ----------------- ----------- Sign Locations H:\2393\006\COVE\SIGN.WPD 9 Introduction The intent of this application is to request a revision to the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Gallatin Center Commercial Development on North 19`h. A location map for Gallatin Center is provided in Exhibit 1. A detailed map showing the layout of Gallatin Center is shown in Exhibit 2. The proposed revision would allow for an additional free standing entryway pylon sign, for multiple businesses, at the intersection of North 19`h and the new Cattail Street, as shown on Exhibit 2. The original PUD freestanding signage guidelines identified two categories for free standing signs; Pylon signs and monument signs. The pylon signs were further defined as interchange zone and entryway overlay district. The approved PUD allowed for one interchange zoned pylon sign and two entryway pylon signs. An interchange zone pylon sign has been installed on the northwest corner of the intersection of Valley Center and North 19th serving the businesses on the north end of the Center. An entryway pylon sign has been installed on Burke Street serving the businesses south of Catron Street. The second approved entryway pylon sign is to be located south of the Rolfe property to provide signage for the future businesses on the southern end of the Center. The remainder of this narrative is to provide the justification for approving the PUD revision and allowing a third entryway pylon sign.to provide signage for the businesses centered around the new Cattail Street. The justification for the revision has been divided into the following four sections: o Changes to the type and size of tenants within Gallatin Center o Change of Cattail Street from a designated local street to a collector o Gallatin Center PUD Freestanding Signage Guidelines o Unified Development Ordinance Sign Code Changes to the Type and Size of Tenants Within Gallatin Center When Gallatin Center was originally planned, large anchor tenants were anticipated as shown in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 is the site plan from 1998 showing the proposed development of the Center. Instead of the large anchor tenants with 80,000— 100,000 square feet stores, such as Target and Costco, smaller national retailers have built within Gallatin Center with floor areas of 20,000 - 30,000 square feet as shown in Exhibit 2. Initial projections were for five retailers at 80,000+square feet each with three smaller retailers. We now have one retailer at 100,000 square feet and eight at 17,000-35,000 square feet with room for four more. It was anticipated the number of businesses requiring signage would be substantially fewer with the large big box stores than is required today with the smaller retailer and the number of businesses allowed on each pylon sign is limited to the space available. Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 1 of 3 4 1 0 0 It is not feasible to install more signs on the approved pylon signs because signage on the pylon sign directories need to be of sufficient size for motorists to easily and safely locate the business they are searching for from there vehicle as they are traveling down North 19th. The total allowed area on each entryway pylon sign is ninety square feet for directories with four or more tenants and sixty square feet for three or less tenants. The required sign size for each business is a minimum of 16"high by 6' in length to ensure the motorists can safely read the sign from the roadway. Therefore, due to the large number of smaller retail businesses developing in Gallatin Center more signage space is now required. The three approved pylon signs that were initially proposed were based on a higher percentage of larger anchor tenants. As a result the-approved pylon signs do not have enough space to accommodate the increase number of tenants. Change of Cattail from a Designated Local Street to a Collector When the original PUD was approved for Gallatin Center, Cattail Street(Deadman's) was listed as a local street with local access into the Center. Since the PUD was approved, Cattail Street has been re-designated as a Collector street. Traditionally directory signage, such as the proposed entryway pylon sign is typically installed at intersections of main streets with high traffic volumes in order to provide signage to the most motorists in a single location. The re-designation of Cattail from a local to a collector street has provided an excellent location to install a third pylon sign directory for the new businesses near Cattail Street. Gallatin Center PUD Freestanding Signage Guidelines The Gallatin Center PUD has sign design guidelines to create an atheistically pleasing graphic environment that is individual and distinctive in identifying the businesses in Gallatin Center and which is also compatible with other signage within the Center. "Lettering shall be well proportioned and its design, spacing and legibility shall be a major criterion for approval." With the third entrance off of North 19th being re-designated to a collector, a third pylon sign at the intersection of Cattail and 19th would assist in tying the Center together with similar signage. It would assist the customers in directing them into the Center without the un-necessary searching for an entrance. Unified Development Ordinance Sign Code The Gallatin Center PUD limits the amount of pole signage within the Center to standards less than the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The UDO allows for one free standing pole style sign for each zoned lot with a maximum area of 32 square feet in a commercial zoned area. Within Phase IV of the Gallatin Center there will be Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 2 of 3 seven lots developed which would allow a total signage of 224 square feet on separate pole signs under the UDO guidelines. By allowing the third pylon sign at the entrance to the Center on Cattail and 19`h it reduce the number of signs for this phase alone from seven to one with a reduction in signage area from 224 square feet to 90 square feet if developed under the UDO guidelines. Summary When Gallatin Center was originally laid out it was anticipated that large retail stores would be constructed. As outlined previously, the anticipated large 100,000 square foot (big box) stores has not occurred, rather smaller 20,000-30,000 square foot stores have been developed. The signage proposed in the PUD was adequate for the large stores that were expected but not for the development of smaller businesses today. With the currently approved pylon signs there is not adequate signage space for all the businesses on the entryway pylon signs without substantially reducing the size of each sign and creating a hazardous environment for the motorists looking for a business. The approval of a third entryway pylon sign would not be detrimental to the entryway corridor and in fact it would be a benefit by providing appropriate signage at appropriate size to assist motorists and pedestrians in locating the businesses in which they wish to shop at. If the third pylon sign is not approved, customers searching for a business in Gallatin Center would not be able to easily locate the store from North 19th.As a result they will likely slow down to search for a wall mounted sign on the stores creating a hazardous situation on the high speed street. Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 3 of 3 i F°Sf I.90 °ffP yC P� fP� 00101 v S � JO Cotron St. P°' Q' Burke St. 9 O x a Si ental Trail I I Deo ns Gu Ct. _ Gollo r Orville Way Gallatin Center I I U0 Ct. O in 0 o W Me° F B o + Boothill Ct. B o Mandeville Ln. 3 FE-- C 0 z Wheat Dr. ti'kiP r U Tschoche Lone 9akfPr Baxter Rd. Ook St. r. 0'��,�• Mo lewood St. t a� rn i Birch St. o Q rn z Hemlock c O olden od —°o Stevens I:z Gie � St. ,Juniper St. CDnnie St 2 F] Civil En Gallatin Center Civil 72 DISCOVERY DRIVE k Exhibit 1 h Land Surveying BOZEMAN,MT 59718 DRAWN BY: CG8 Location Map ALLIED Geotechnical Engineering PHONE(406)592-M I DATE: 2/24/04 Bozeman,MT ENGINEERING Structural Engineering FAX(406)582.57T0 PROJECT r01-242 BERv�CfiH.�wi C. Introduction Introduction The intent of this application is to request a revision to the approved Planned Unit Development(PUD) for the Gallatin Center Commercial Development on North 19`h. A location map for Gallatin Center is provided in Exhibit 1. A detailed map showing the layout of Gallatin Center is shown in Exhibit 2. The proposed revision would allow for an additional free standing entryway pylon sign, for multiple businesses, at the intersection of North 190' and the new Cattail Street, as shown on Exhibit 2. The original PUD freestanding signage guidelines identified two categories for free standing signs; Pylon signs and monument signs. The pylon signs were further defined as interchange zone and entryway overlay district. The approved PUD allowed for one interchange zoned pylon sign and two entryway pylon signs. An interchange zone pylon sign has been installed on the northwest corner of the intersection of Valley Center and North 19"'serving the businesses on the north end of the Center. An entryway pylon sign has been installed on Burke Street serving the businesses south of Catron Street. The second approved entryway pylon sign is to be located south of the Rolfe property to provide signage for the future businesses on the southern end of the Center. The remainder of this narrative is to provide the justification for approving the PUD revision and allowing a third entryway pylon sign to provide signage for the businesses centered around the new Cattail Street. The justification for the revision has been divided into the following four sections: o Changes to the type and size of tenants within Gallatin Center o Change of Cattail Street from a designated local street to a collector o Gallatin Center PUD Freestanding Signage Guidelines o Unified Development Ordinance Sign Code Changes to the Type and Size of Tenants Within Gallatin Center When Gallatin Center was originally planned, large anchor tenants were anticipated as shown in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 is the site plan from 1998 showing the proposed development of the Center. Instead of the large anchor tenants with 80,000— 100,000 square feet stores, such as Target and Costco, smaller national retailers have built within Gallatin Center with floor areas of 20,000 - 30,000 square feet as shown in Exhibit 2. Initial projections were for five retailers at 80,000+square feet each with three smaller retailers. We now have one retailer at 100,000 square feet and eight at 17,000-35,000 square feet with room for four more. It was anticipated the number of businesses requiring signage would be substantially fewer with the large big box stores than is required today with the smaller retailer and the number of businesses allowed on each pylon sign is limited to the space available. Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 1 of 3 0 • It is not feasible to install more signs on the approved pylon signs because signage on the pylon sign directories need to be of sufficient size for motorists to easily and safely locate the business they are searching for from there vehicle as they are traveling down North 19th. The total allowed area on each entryway pylon sign is ninety square feet for directories with four or more tenants and sixty square feet for three or less tenants. The required sign size for each business is a minimum of 16"high by 6' in length to ensure the motorists can safely read the sign from the roadway. Therefore, due to the large number of smaller retail businesses developing in Gallatin Center more signage space is now required. The three approved pylon signs that were initially proposed were based on a higher percentage of larger anchor tenants. As a result the approved pylon signs do not have enough space to accommodate the increase number of tenants. Change of Cattail from a Designated Local Street to a Collector When the original PUD was approved for Gallatin Center, Cattail Street (Deadman's) was listed as a local street with local access into the Center. Since the PUD was approved, Cattail Street has been re-designated as a Collector street. Traditionally directory signage, such as the proposed entryway pylon sign is typically installed at intersections of main streets with high traffic volumes in order to provide signage to the most motorists in a single location. The re-designation of Cattail from a local to a collector street has provided an excellent location to install a third pylon sign directory for the new businesses near Cattail Street. Gallatin Center PUD Freestanding Signage Guidelines The Gallatin Center PUD has sign design guidelines to create an atheistically pleasing graphic environment that is individual and distinctive in identifying the businesses in Gallatin Center and which is also compatible with other signage within the Center. "Lettering shall be well proportioned and its design, spacing and legibility shall be a major criterion for approval." With the third entrance off of North 19th being re-designated to a collector, a third pylon sign at the intersection of Cattail and 19th would assist in tying the Center together with similar signage. It would assist the customers in directing them into the Center without the un-necessary searching for an entrance. Unified Development Ordinance Sign Code The Gallatin Center PUD limits the amount of pole signage within the Center to standards less than the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The UDO allows for one free standing pole style sign for each zoned lot with a maximum area of 32 square feet in a commercial zoned area. Within Phase IV of the Gallatin Center there will be Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 2 of 3 seven lots developed which would allow a total signage of 224 square feet on separate pole signs under the UDO guidelines. By allowing the third pylon sign at the entrance to the Center on Cattail and 19th it reduce the number of signs for this phase alone from seven to one with a reduction in signage area from 224 square feet to 90 square feet if developed under the UDO guidelines. Summary When Gallatin Center was originally laid out it was anticipated that large retail stores would be constructed. As outlined previously, the anticipated large 100,000 square foot (big box) stores has not occurred,rather smaller 20,000-30,000 square foot stores have been developed. The signage proposed in the PUD was adequate for the large stores that were expected but not for the development of smaller businesses today. With the currently approved pylon signs there is not adequate signage space for all the businesses on the entryway pylon signs without substantially reducing the size of each sign and creating a hazardous environment for the motorists looking for a business. The approval of a third entryway pylon sign would not be detrimental to the entryway corridor and in fact it would be a benefit by providing appropriate signage at appropriate size to assist motorists and pedestrians in locating the businesses in which they wish to shop at. If the third pylon sign is not approved, customers searching for a business in Gallatin Center would not be able to easily locate the store from North 19thh. As a result they will likely slow down to search for a wall mounted sign on the stores creating a hazardous situation on the high speed street. Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 3 of 3 F°Sr yc P�f P� �OO a v S R ,� Cotron St. P°' Q> Burke St. 9 p x Si entol Trail I I Deo ns GO Ct. Gollo Orville Way Gallatin (Center I I Ct. T O � C v) (n O yO E o Me° s E O ~ -F Boothill Ct. E o Mandeville Ln. E-r- C zWheat Dr. A.'ijr� i PS p Y i� v Tschoche Lane 9047 Baxter Rd. Oak St. EA-2 r. Ma lewood St. L Q) rn L Birch St. > o Q z Hemlock C o olden ad —°a Stevens y G U o ois i e � m nn 5 St. Juniper St. ie St Z r Gallatin Center '� Civil Engineering 32 DISCOVERY DRIVE "� Exhibit I its Land Surveying BOZEMAN,MT 59r18 DRAMW BY: CGB Location Map ALLIED Geotechnical Engineering PHO74E(406)582-M I DATE: 2/24/04 ENGINEERING Structural Engineering FAX(406)582-5770 PROJECT ros-z.z Bozeman,MT 9Eiiv�CE9.ANC. Introduction GALLATIN CENTER SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REVISION APPLICATION Prepared by: ALLIED ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 32 Discovery Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone (406) 582-0221 Fax (406) 582-5770 FEBRUARY, 2004 - J.O. 03-242.1 Introduction Introduction The intent of this application is to request a revision to the approved Planned Unit Development(PUD) for the Gallatin Center Commercial Development on North 19th. A location map for Gallatin Center is provided in Exhibit 1. A detailed map showing the layout of Gallatin Center is shown in Exhibit 2. The proposed revision would allow for an additional free standing entryway pylon sign, for multiple businesses, at the intersection of North 19`h and the new Cattail Street, as shown on Exhibit 2. The original PUD freestanding signage guidelines identified two categories for free standing signs; Pylon signs and monument signs. The pylon signs were further defined as interchange zone and entryway overlay district. The approved PUD allowed for one interchange zoned pylon sign and two entryway pylon signs. An interchange zone pylon sign has been installed on the northwest comer of the intersection of Valley Center and North 19`h serving the businesses on the north end of the Center. An entryway pylon sign has been installed on Burke Street serving the businesses south of Catron Street. The second approved entryway pylon sign is to be located south of the Rolfe property to provide signage for the future businesses on the southern end of the Center. The remainder of this narrative is to provide the justification for approving the PUD revision and allowing a third entryway pylon sign.to provide signage for the businesses centered around the new Cattail Street. The justification for the revision has been divided into the following four sections: o Changes to the type and size of tenants within Gallatin Center o Change of Cattail Street from a designated local street to a collector o Gallatin Center PUD Freestanding Signage Guidelines o Unified Development Ordinance Sign Code Changes to the Type and Size of Tenants Within Gallatin Center When Gallatin Center was originally planned, large anchor tenants were anticipated as shown in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 is the site plan from 1998 showing the proposed development of the Center. Instead of the large anchor tenants with 80,000— 100,000 square feet stores, such as Target and Costco, smaller national retailers have built within Gallatin Center with floor areas of 20,000 - 30,000 square feet as shown in Exhibit 2. Initial projections were for five retailers at 80,000+square feet each with three smaller retailers. We now have one retailer at 100,000 square feet and eight at 17,000-35,000 square feet with room for four more. It was anticipated the number of businesses requiring signage would be substantially fewer with the large big box stores than is required today with the smaller retailer and the number of businesses allowed on each pylon sign is limited to the space available. Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 1 of 3 It is not feasible to install more signs on the approved pylon signs because signage on the pylon sign directories need to be of sufficient size for motorists to easily and safely locate the business they are searching for from there vehicle as they are traveling down North 19`h. The total allowed area on each entryway pylon sign is ninety square feet for directories with four or more tenants and sixty square feet for three or less tenants. The required sign size for each business is a minimum of 16"high by 6' in length to ensure the motorists can safely read the sign from the roadway. Therefore, due to the large number of smaller retail businesses developing in Gallatin Center more signage space is now required. The three approved pylon signs that were initially proposed were based on a higher percentage of larger anchor tenants. As a result the approved pylon signs do not have enough space to accommodate the increase number of tenants. Change of Cattail from a Designated Local Street to a Collector When the original PUD was approved for Gallatin Center, Cattail Street(Deadman's) was listed as a local street with local access into the Center. Since the PUD was approved, Cattail Street has been re-designated as a Collector street. Traditionally directory signage, such as the proposed entryway pylon sign is typically installed at intersections of main streets with high traffic volumes in order to provide signage to the most motorists in a single location. The re-designation of Cattail from a local to a collector street has provided an excellent location to install a third pylon sign directory for the new businesses near Cattail Street. Gallatin Center PUD Freestanding Signage Guidelines The Gallatin Center PUD has sign design guidelines to create an atheistically pleasing graphic environment that is individual and distinctive in identifying the businesses in Gallatin Center and which is also compatible with other signage within the Center. "Lettering shall be well proportioned and its design, spacing and legibility shall be a major criterion for approval." With the third entrance off of North 19`h being re-designated to a collector, a third pylon sign at the intersection of Cattail and 191h would assist in tying the Center together with similar signage. It would assist the customers in directing them into the Center without the un-necessary searching for an entrance. Unified Development Ordinance Sign Code The Gallatin Center PUD limits the amount of pole signage within the Center to standards less than the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The UDO allows for one free standing pole style sign for each zoned lot with a maximum area of 32 square feet in a commercial zoned area. Within Phase IV of the Gallatin Center there will be Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 2 of 3 seven lots developed which would allow a total signage of 224 square feet on separate pole signs under the UDO guidelines. By allowing the third pylon sign at the entrance to the Center on Cattail and 19`h it reduce the number of signs for this phase alone from seven to one with a reduction in signage area from 224 square feet to 90 square feet if developed under the UDO guidelines. Summary When Gallatin Center was originally laid out it was anticipated that large retail stores would be constructed. As outlined previously, the anticipated large 100,000 square foot (big box) stores has not occurred,rather smaller 20,000-30,000 square foot stores have been developed. The signage proposed in the PUD was adequate for the large stores that were expected but not for the development of smaller businesses today. With the currently approved pylon signs there is not adequate signage space for all the businesses on the entryway pylon signs without substantially reducing the size of each sign and creating a hazardous environment for the motorists looking for a business. The approval of a third entryway pylon sign would not be detrimental to the entryway corridor and in fact it would be a benefit by providing appropriate signage at appropriate size to assist motorists and pedestrians in locating the businesses in which they wish to shop at. If the third pylon sign is not approved, customers searching for a business in Gallatin Center would not be able to easily locate the store from North 19th. As a result they will likely slow down to search for a wall mounted sign on the stores creating a hazardous situation on the high speed street. Gallatin Center PUD Revision Page 3 of 3 yC e,�f e,. 000, v S JO Cotron St.Qi Q' Burke St. I x � ° Si entol Trail I I Deo ns Gu Ct. _ Goll° r Orville Way Gallatin Center I I Ct. 1 o � � 0 (n 0 0 E c -i Meo o a) o � Boothill Ct. B o "E;C! Mandeville Ln. ' 3 c z Wheat Dr. es O Y U Tschache Lone 9°kre� Baxter Rd. Oak St. Mo lewood St. L rn r Birch St. ¢ 0) D z Hemlock c o olden ad —° ° 0 ; Stevens o a1sa c o e 5 St. Juniper St. CD nnie St r Z r Gallatin Center Civil Engineering 32DIScOVERV DRIVE Exhibit 1 .E Lev_ Land Surveying BOZEMAN,MT 59718 DRAWN BY: CGB Location Map ALLIED Geotechnical Engineering PHONE(406)582-M21 DATE: 2/24/04 ENGINEERING Structural Engineering FAX(406)582•5770 PROJECT /:03-242 Bozeman,MT )TIT,rrl'N"ITrrf ITI �.-------,/1Tei nTilTTUMMHTMl� GALLATIN CENTER urry GALLATIXCENITERPUDfL f- � P J01 ACRES 'MINORSUI 210LOT2. o-ttffi�444{fi4ii�al J-576ACRPS - Ep =MINORSUB210 LOT] A\ 13771 ACRES `i•` �C� \ /GALLATIN CENTER PUD PH 2 2.78 ACRES '111111.I11RU.I.IAlll(II.IJ.I.Illlfti.11111lA0.I.IAllllrA.l.1Jl111.Wllillili.i.i1 l I "1......._-Jr—i _,ice �� CATRON STREET »fir�rm.IT4nmTTrhrT brnrumarm.nrnn� I �`�� P1144+++4f1$++�41I14W44i1 &+N�II444 I1I�74��(�1J��7�4�4L��h11y8 I GALLATIN CENTER PUD PHASE C.C.PUD ].97O 1-LOT 5 l LOPHASE, NOT TO SCALE i I ff iiilfff�111ffH+ I I T7 I y ,I 2. CALLA71\C6TINTER"TER PUD 2E ACRES i GALLATIN CENTER PUD PHASE]-LOTS C.C.PUD EXISTING INTERCHANGE T11rrr8�IlrTIIIIP I PHASEI-LOT4 I 10.85 ACRES ' PI1.T 2.19 ACRES PYLON SIGN LOCATION LOT t •aTIRT]TTTa.7iTTlltallTilTIi7LP� 0.76ACRES ff414�f4fffN TARGET STORE _4(llttt(��'�1y fft�111�Bll��LL j[�y ---O 1IIN7'fa;44rIi 1T�!IfrH�44T4 � ALLATD4 CENTER PU PHASE]-LOTJ ii +44{N'N's'+��I�1� 41i 17�1+44•_ 1 1.65 ACRES EXISTING ENTRYWAY PYLON SIGN LOCATION BOB WARD'S GALLATIN CENTER PUD --r.- -- - 1 I PHASE 11-LOT 9 I = -= GALLATIN CENTER PUD PHASE- PHASE 11-LOT 10 j - •' GALLATIN CEVZ 9.97 AR PUD I� �CRES� _� PH.49E II-LOT 9.1 L69 ACRE9sin - = ROSS = BUILdNC I I ICHAEL BORDERS BUILDING NH+++ IMIBEN++I+ BUILDING : •• LOT 112 flM BUILDING• :.,++ +3.30.1+++N+++ .._ I — — . — — . - - I z I \ ,BUILDING I \ LOT II BUILDING 111111 IWIII�WIIIIII➢ = 8.61 acres BUILDwc f�lll !fl'llli fnlT�rrtl = L l PRO ON ENTRYWAY SIGN LOCATION ---BUILDING I L . GTTAIL STRELrI' 90'R/1Y DEAD MANS GULCH LOT - 1.28 acres LOT 16 LOT 14 LOT 12 0.81 acres 0.98 acres 1.38 acres LOT.. LOT 17 l I I 4.04 acres 3.76 acres 11 i 1 1 Ii PROPOSED WEST CATRON �i CREEK RELOCATION I I ROLFE PROPERTY 1 NOT PART OF GALLATIN CENTER I I I I LOT 19 I I 3.88 ACRES � 1 o I I I ' I I 1 I I � I I o I I z i — —— — I FUTURE ENTRYWAY — i PYLON SIGN LOCATION 49.8 AC REh1A11fING AREA ,/ RES. o I I I �- ---------------- --- - Y- - -i---- ----•- I I li IPOST OFFICE I { I I II I I Civil Engineering 12aacovmvmlw EXhibit2 BAXTER LANE v.s... T. R. Lana SarverR n BO>SMAX,MT 59111 DRAWN BY: CG8 ® 55 15 I 5E ALLIED Geotechnicel Engineering rNON6I 711d1i1 wain s.o7-�a1.5 ENOINERRINO Stmcturul Engineering rAX 1�551 s11-s>fs ® Js 1s sE DATE: 02/23/04 n-•a+w Developer Tract - � =F Target Tract - I 3'17'W �1 ■ N OPI3'47-E K 5 DD'13.47 W i— --— _S'PUBUC—— EAB-------- — __ _______I__—___ i -` _:_:_- RFI (�CAT�LRFFX________-- Traci ta tote) --� L, ------------ -- ------ ��°'�— -� , l Total Site Area 472,451sf-10.85acres ------ -- --- T - PrirTsary Building Area FuWre P .Access Pin s Discount Retail 123,408sf ----- ---------------- --,I $ N .�EOFACT I I Parldn'g Required 574 cars @ 4.65/1000sfaccess area 'I b i Wx77' m� I i Parking Shown 574 cars I Bulldl ng L__ _ BU AI u - Area I 1De Sec-Temporary DINe 'F c 'tea 1 °Id I L-a ---------- ----1 __ _ Tredtb(Lot 9) I o I "l Total Site Area 269,917sf-6.19 acres Target I ti._ _ Garden I I __ � �� Tenant 1 25,500sf Major Tenant ^� 123,408 sf , O T�nantz 3o,eo,af Center ot3,003sf Tenant 1 Tenant 71 I _ i I - Total Befall 56,301 V 25,500sf 30,801 sf I °;°" Max Building Height 38' I I $ -_ /j' Parlkinig Required 329 cars - - 21,984sf 129 987sf Total Retail ? `"®`�' I I -I" '" Parks Shown 330cars _=J Max.Bulking Height 37 UAW DOOR Max.Building Height 32' _ 1 • „y I PelSisop I 1 . C O M M E R C I A Trek tc(Lot 10) 1 Total Site Area 557,174sf-12.79 acres » Pu sENn B_ Major Tenant 129,987sf rJ Retail 4,200sf Total Retail 134,187sf ;Im I° - Panting Required 671 cars 9 Par HAW COSTCO SITE j king Shown 6B2 cars I' I I I I Tred 2(Lot 12) t I H(l I I u I I I I Total Site Area 222 874sf-5.12 aces Lo � I, t o Motel(footprvd area) 29,952sf Sp 1 I ; o II Toad 3(tot ea ' I Wig.II I Total Site Area 596,609sf-13.70 saes g I T =mi Major.Tenat 81,795sf I Tenant 2 25,9765f 11 tl w a r I I ' �'c u + I Retail 20,8175f ¢ - - - ' Total Retail 128,6" +� I O Parking Required 643 tars I —_—_—_—___ 1620.79 - .570. ' (((VJ�� .--•--'--'--•-- --•-1' Parldni;Shown 643cars --_ 1 _ aV£flkle _—_—_—_—_—_—_—,— .16.07 III I I I i / I o I i f~ `I —_--_—_---_15'PUBLoc URUTY a 9DEwr_LI ACC s 2r4Errt zs'Pueuc vnuTr EA6t[uENr __ ' 0 j Parcel 1(Lot 3) W CORa�&t s•mw I �zs vuauc one-rm soewau -----�. � .M tl P f Pr ct // Total Site Area 71,944sf-1s5 saes Bo'STREAM CARRIDDR BD'STREAM case _ _ 90'SiRFJJ1 t.ORWDOR ---- cll I of IL I I I I ' r-- ` rl 1 ,��' ./ 'Parcel2(L.ot4) jI ------------- .. � j II I �/� / Total Site Area 95,507sf-2.19 acres I, - r ---- - 58 I I I II I 4 - g yI i iH1111I i i f� res A I �da IIII 9 tBjr>gAr / Parcel 3 i s I Mai Tenant 1 III �' 'Total.She Area 85,667sf-,.97atses c i I I nN I j 81,79 f II IIIIjIIIL1111LJllifl 20 aP / cc Bs' i I I I Build F s \\ / / r m s/a Parcel 4(Lot 6) m m l -_ / i o cAP Total Site Area 33,036sf-0.76 aces 2 m iI I Bu lda,g Area SS III III I III I I 3p.1 u^ / P. I cr9 i r . din I I / >P 7 �� Parcel 5(Lot 7) gm a = Total Site Area 98,322sf-2.26 acres g;6 •o' N I ' I Tenant 2 %6iff III I r 25.976sf '4> ,. , ,� sf 41 >i i I r I I 32 Retail 1 20,917sf i /' --- -- / Not P ?' s $� --- I- / 1 ----=-_-- ----- - 1 - ------- � --- ------ -- ---- M E----- _ 3`� to Inte nch7 'Wft ME �IoSi9n Pyl 306.B6' �g 3w E �o g e l Project:9W Sign File: 2001-,5-t•e3 Date: 1 111 8/1 9 9 8 WAY...... .. .... .-._.. C7 oUtADDR E ement _ram_)/-`� t i scale. _ -�- — Noft"_.: _. --- --:N� Avenue _ . ._... - Hal ' Developer Tract - Develo(Trac. _ r ,��9 NeTLb C ML {34� 4i I NWM 1WA• f+Yms Loun SQcam 7 ot 36 lAMtcge Analde La sto �encye�t �•. \ su ': �{�',•{. Ard�uif Uo Net Ste Eaemert Lxrxftepo EntrIldt �'• �•'�...:+ CM PW SU Area C Area aso—t Bozeman T ac,a Qd 6j 4R BI V ,ox$Vast 0,7as c 424.7m V D C 424.706If 2DA9% ��y*k t TraG t a 0 9) 2®,917 tl 6.19 acros 76,686 tl 21ti3?tl oar 2t9p2 tl 11 b6 tac lc , 557,94 If 12.""aces Y+,BC II -'M c 6 9 600."M S MAI Trac] 1� 2a57a tl 6.,2 cruse 22,2I0>r 210 664 If 2,,754 4 179.H6,1 657Y Gallatin Center Trat3 CA I I) 5%,®9 9 Is.-aces 66,6/5 c 629,994 c opfi er 4M'Sle r 3321 n Panxl I "41 7,gs4 W 1.65 win 6 sr 71.9649 21A59 5f !a.%1 tl 256 Exhibit Par¢I2 a34) 95,9]7 tl L19 aces D if35.sD7 ar Mae90 76,61asr 359% E +"t•"w� North 19th Avenue&Valley Center Road . 3 3 Vicinity Map Paas pn6J 99,W6tl IA7aces 16,taac 33 1 ,a29oa 33.MGc 25 Bozeman, Montana PasvJ 4 Q1!6j 4i,Ri6 tl 6.76 acres D if 11,676 C D C 39A96 tl 16T6 Tags ZSWA t or 57 scat ID.®t7 i12 A"0 117AU a7 2.100170 � .. ' ".�i7�.4L'xn'SG�}.F7 Application and Check List OF BOZEMAN 0 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. Name of Project/Development: 6 ALLAT1 t4 CCN TE 2 2. Property Owner Information: Name: C?qLL i i M CCN Te A - L l� E-mail Address: Mailing Address: 5TSO L 3 J )le6E r,-41 5 ut rE 3 8c /'>4<«s 75-a</O Phone: 972- �/90-�/ 90o FAX: 97.?, y90 5/9QJ 3.Applicant Information: Name: S Ar-tC A-5 � 5 o 06 E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: r Name: �N C-/N EE fL)N(> E-mail Address: Mailing Address: 3 2 (//SGD dE/L'f �n. o zC--<,4t1J /-( T Phone: ,_8 2-D Z 2/ FAX: 5-6R 2-S-7 7v 5. Legal Description: L6. Street Address: /vp.RT/y �9 t� ^ �E"Tu �N ��y Te!-4 C&�tTc.L 7. Project Description: T )i2EQ L s5i /4 T7t/140 C^1 r_14 w#-X-V PY1C._"A( '51&AI J 04 8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): 110. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Page 1 � L or 11. Gross Area: Acres: f cfr(af Square Feet:6 G//yp� 27c/ 12.Net Area: Acres: �93*,,-Square Feet:S-/ `/36 13. Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 13a. Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation Entryway Corridor 14. Will this application require a deviation(s)? Yes �•p e0.d- I ❑ No 15. Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A. Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan []B. Reuse,Change in Use, Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan N vOt F�G4riOd( ❑D.Reuse,CZange in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E. Special Temporary Use Permit ❑ T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ®I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X. Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment 'K. Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z. Zoning Variance ❑L. Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑ M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24- by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 81/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and/or property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development, approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above in forma ti and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Dater/ Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Sibature: Date: Property Owner's Siba re: Date: Property Owner's S ature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) • SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Does the proposal one or more of the following: Yes No 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 30,000 or more square feet of office space,retail commercial space;service commercial space or industrial ® ❑ space More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses,permitted retail commercial uses,permitted ❑ service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ Parking for more than 60 vehicles 14 ❑ B. Generallnformation. General Information Yes No N/A Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ Lis of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ ❑ A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will travel ❑ ❑ to and from the site. The route shall avoid,where possible,local or minor collector streets or streets where conRnumon traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety Boundary line of property with dimensions W/o Nl C N 5 v cNS 19 ❑ ❑ Date of plan preparation and changes 19 ❑ ❑ North point indicator [9 ❑ ❑ Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ 0 Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet (� ❑ ❑ Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio,FAR),with a ❑ ❑ ( j breakdown by land use Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following: Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ [� Driveway and parking ❑ El (� Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ �J . parks,school sites,etc. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ Total number,type and density per type of dwelling units,and total net and gross residential density ❑ ❑ and density per residential parcel Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, 0 ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee panning spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each The informarion required by 118.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless such ❑ ❑ information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed, or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application Description and mapping of soils existing on the site,accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of ❑ ❑ such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist-Prepared 12/05/03) Building design information (on-site): Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ R Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot outfall ❑ ❑ when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/or ❑ ❑ construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with ' 18.78.0501 I,BMC(Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72,BMC (Supplementary ❑ ❑ �] Documents) C Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet,or as determined by the Planning Director ❑ ❑ Adjacent streets and street rights-of--way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to major ® ❑ ❑ arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet On-site streets and rights-of-way ❑ ❑ Ingress and egress points ® ❑ ❑ Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ Traffic flow off-site ❑ ❑ Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: Electric ❑ ❑ Natural gas ❑ ❑ Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ Water ❑ ❑ Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ Surface water,including: Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches 5Q ❑ ❑ Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands R ❑ ❑ Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100 year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis,topographic survey or other objective and factual basis A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58,BMC(Bozeman Floodplain ❑ ❑ -K Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality ❑ ❑ improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies,diversion ditches, spillways,reservoirs, etc.which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated-- The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) [� ❑ ❑ The downstream conditions (developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant topographic ❑ ❑ features Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details and ❑ ❑ interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict Page 4 Provision for handicapped accenibility, including but not limited to, wheelchairlWps, parking ❑ ❑ spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ Exterior signs. Note-The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for [� ❑ ❑ compliance with Chapter 1852, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ A site plan, complete with all structures, parking spaces, building entrances, traffic areas (both (4 ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian),vegetation that might interfere with*ring, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in '18.78.060Y,BMC (Lighting Plan),if not previously provided Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ ( ] Landscaping - detailed plan showing plantings, equipment, and other appropriate information as ❑ ❑ required in 118.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required, complete section C below. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and ❑ ❑ shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ EO Location of City limit boundaries, and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ I ❑ Iistonc,cultural and archeological resources,describe and map any designated historic structures or ❑ ❑ 21 districts,and archeological or cultural sites Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ 0 D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the property ❑ ❑ owner and the person preparing the plan Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑ El El Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses,required watercourse setbacks,and the location of ❑ ❑ El any 100 year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines, driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ I ❑ Location, height and material of proposed screening and fencing (with berms to be delineated by ❑ ❑ one foot contours) Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer strips ❑ ❑ Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, including ❑ ❑ ZJ typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes ar installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking and ❑ ❑ (� loading areas, including information as to the amount (in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from damage ❑ ❑ 91 during construction Size, height, location and material of proposed searing, lighting, planters, sculptures, and water ❑ ❑ Ez features A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ Page 5 Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ Tabulation of points earned by the plan-see 1 18.48.060,BMC(Landscape Performance Standards) ❑ ❑ Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ 91 Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage ❑ ❑ control Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ [� Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ to Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ M Planting plan for watercourse buffers, per 118.42.100, BMC (Watercourse Setbacks), if not ❑ ❑ R) previously provided through subdivision review Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not otherwise ❑ ❑ (� provided by the application.Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 PUD Signage Guidelines 2. FREESTAND G SIGNAGE GUIDELINES • A. GENERAL: All free standing signs should complement the appearance and function of adjacent roadways and the entryway corridors while protecting the unique views beyond the corridor. The purpose of free-standing signage guidelines related to the Gallatin Center Development is to promote signage designs which are: 1. Compatible with surroundings, expressive of the identity of individual properties and sensitive to the goals for the design and character of the Entryway corridors of Bozeman. 2. Orderly and appropriate to the activity to which they pertain; related to the place where the activity represented is located. 3. Non-distracting to motorists. 4. Aesthetically pleasing. While these standards are intended to enhance the overall quality and aesthetic appearance of this.project, it is important that these standards maintain and convey the intent of the City of Bozeman's standard signage ordinance as summarized in section 18.65.100 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. B. PROHIBITED SIGNS: The following signs are prohibited: Any sign which: Imitate or resemble any official traffic sign, signal or device; - Consists of banners, pennants, ribbons, streamers, strings or light bulbs and spinners; except during a holiday season, or for ethnic and thematic events. Is in any.way animated (including twinkling or wind-activated movable parts), emits smoke, visible vapors, particles, sound or odor, or rotates or moves in any manner. - Has flashing lights incorporated as part of its design and performance. - Use lights which are not effectively shielded as to prevent beams or rays of light from being directed at any portion.of the traveled ways and which are of such brilliance as to cause glare or to impair the vision of the driver of any motor vehicle or otherwise interfere with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle. - Is portable: fixed on a movable stand; self-supporting without being firmly embedded in the ground; supported by other objects; mounted on wheels or movable vehicle; or made 7 easily movable in any manner. Is located (painted, affixed, etc.) on trees, rocks or other natural features. Is an off-premise sign, referring to a business or merchant not doing business on the premise where the sign is displayed. Overhangs the right-of-way or property line: Is a free-standing or projecting sign which does.not comply with the following guidelines. C. FREESTANDING SIGNAGE DESIGN GUIDELINES The Gallatin Center Development poses a unique opportunity to define and insure appropriate, quality design standards for free standing signage. This guideline separates freestanding signage into two categories; pylon signs and monument signs. Conceptual drawings of the proposed pylon and monument signs are shown in the following drawings. The first indicates shows the family of proposed signs. The second shows the signs proposed for the Target application. The proposed locations for the pylon signs are shown on the following map. 1. PYLON SIGN—INTERCHANGE ZONE One pylon sign may be erected on Valley Center Road to a height not to exceed thirty- five feet. Total allowable area shall be a maximum of one hundred square feet. Pylon freestanding signs shall be set back a minimum of fifteen feet and will maintain al least an ten feet minimum vertical clearance. There are no allowances for additional size. 2. PYLON SIGNS—ENTRYWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT Two signs may be erected along North 191h Avenue. The first at the intersection of the roadway intersecting 19`h and bordering Phase I and Phase II. The second may be erected at any point along the frontage of North 19`h Avenue directly in front of Phase IV. Each sign may not exceed a height of twenty-five feet. Reference site plan and Exhibit A. Total allowable area shall be a maximum of ninety (90) square feet for directories with four or more tenants and sixty (60) square feet for three tenants or less. Pylon freestanding signs shall be set back a minimum of fifteen feet and will maintain al least an eight feet minimum vertical clearance. There are no allowances for additional size. 3. MONUMENT SIGNS Monument signs for single property users shall be permitted along the frontage of each property. Each monument sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet.in area, nor five (5) feet in height, and must be setback a minimum of five (5) from the property lines. All monument signs may identify the single business with name and/or logo only and must display the street number address in figures which are at least four and a half(4-1/2) 8 inches high for larns and three 3 inches for smaller si n'! g g g ( ) g Monument signs for multi-property users shall be permitted at each secondary entrance of the Gallatin Center Project, provided each sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area, nor seven (7) in height, and must be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from the property lines. All monument signs shall only identify the complex and must display the street number address in figures which are at least three (3) inches high. (See the following drawings for examples of signage types proposed for this project.) T. a - - - - - - - -y-+-_-- _ - - ---------_ ------------------------- 1 _ - -- - \ "- - - - - - - - r - - - GAG 0 . .i.. Sign Locations H:\2393\006\COVE\SIGN.WPD 9 AMk CALLA TIN CENTER SIGNA GE Gallatin Structural staid frame dad with aluminum Center pc ds Major Conventional internally Tenant Luminated sign cabinets 0 TARGET #1 fV Major Tenant#1 Major Major Tenant Tenant Major Tenant# #2 #3 Major Tenant#3 90 sq.ft of Ta allowable h c sign orea 7 Major Tenant Major Tenant# r o III `w Metal grill: color I to match retail _ B'—B' f]lU base 6_B. 32 sq.fL of =r• t�7:3>;= TeIlant 32 sq.ft re signage area signage area c I Address I c Smooth face Smooth face Tit T—ani color integr l c Tenant color integral enu I cmu Cast eueete bole split—foce color to Address/ split—face color : integral vmu b1!egrel cma Cost concrete base c �� V 1V ~ L 2'-4' I 5-1 C' 2—4' I I t 14—4' l i r-pd LARG7 Dra: a62!as LtEasis of Signoge Area Srak: v�r North � N n I PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW PA Multi-tenant Single Tenant Entryway Corridor Interchange Monument sign Monument sign Pylon sign Pylon sign MULTI—TENANT no scale SINGLE TENANT no scale no scale no scale MORRISON ❑ MAIERLE,INC. ONCE 1945 rn m Ina lei T'dig%4 6aa In xm.Roc twsl 9D-RI r=(Lx)5ar-1I76 REVISION DATE 6/26/98 REVISION DATE.. DRAWN BY: CNW/BLF DATE 9/4/97 2193/DO6/PRE?LAT/S- S G/ V AC CHECKD BY: TNH DRAWING ND_ III JOB NO.: 2393/006/0310 SHEET 1 OF 1 Adjoiners List CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, C h RI S G. byle�sl-" , hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners within 200 feet of the property located at C7 AL-A T1 N C C N TE 4 is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. Signature (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List—Prepared 11/20/03) Smooth Feed SheetsTM • Use template for 51600 Gardner-Simmental Plaza S/D Avatar, LLC Boie &Kindt Partnership 1 Simmental Way 2059 Triple Tree Road 67 Hitching Post Road Bozeman,MT 59718 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman MT 59715 Machinery Power&Equipment Co. MCPA Mass (TN)Associates Double S. Holding, LLC c/o W.P. Cary & Co. LLC 17035 W. Valley Hwy. 145 Rawhide Ridge Road Tukwila, WA 98188 50 Rockefeller Plaza, 2nd Floor Bozeman, MT 59718-7995 New York,NY 10020-1605 Gary T. Holkup T. F. P. Enterprises, LLC Montbill Corporation P.O. Box 104 3119 Augusta Drive P.O. Box 28606 Bozeman, MT 59771 Bozeman, MT 59715-8702 Atlanta, GA 30358-0606 SKA, Inc. Costco Wholesale Corp. Valley Center Enterprises LLC 630 E. Cottonwood 999 Lake Drive 2305 Catron Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Issaquah, WA 98027-8990 Bozeman, MT 59718-7261 Home Depot USA, Inc. Sandan LLC Bruce W. Campbell P.O. Box 105842 P.O. Box 1254 1163 Thomas Drive Atlanta, GA 30348-5842 Bozeman, MT 59771-1254 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 P. Andrew VanOrden P. Andrew VanOrden Richard L. Miller Debbie L. VanOrden Elizabeth Hager Larilyn L. Miller 1193 Thomas Drive 1193 Thomas Drive 1242 Thomas Drive Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 William Louis James David Secor Brenda L. Burden Mardie Louis Bonnie Lee Secor 1317 Thomas Drive . 1265 Thomas Drive 1295 Thomas Drive Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Ronald L. Davis Doreen J. Arneson, Revocable Cape-France Enterprises P.O. Box 2672 Trust 2220 W. Main St. Clackamas OR 97015-2672 13314 N. High Meadows Drive Bozeman MT 59718-4002 ' Blackhawk, SD 57718-9013 ' Eugene Graf III R.G. Davis U.S.P.S. P.O. Box 906 13920 Thiesen Rd. 5711 Baxter Ln. East Bozeman, MT 59771-0906 Belgrade,MT 59714-8019 Bozeman, MT 59718 David W. Gaworski John A. Sheffield Vickie L. Surber Carol M. Gaworski Nancy Sheffield Gene W. Surber 1143 Thomas Dr. 1109 Thomas Dr. 1167 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-8563 Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 MAVERY® Address Labels Laser 51600 Smooth,Feed SheetsTM • i Use template for 5160® Marcella Scheer Blair G. McGavin Ervin Sukut Alfred C. Scheer 1013 Thomas Dr. Agnes Sukut 1001 Thomas Dr. 1367 Thomas Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 Bozeman, MT 59718-9737 Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 Qwet West LLC 125 W. Mendenhall St. Bozeman, MT 59715-3586 /II AVERYO Address Labels Laser 5160®