Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
638300223899522793)
J M i r 4 . k f ,I t. a tit t - ,Iv:.r • • yS � • nu r r Mi,l i..e.r .. PiY Y y` •tA� e 4. r }'• V! ti� if�� �' P,: 4,•X M Y\fit • !�'r,!yS� •`,rj•J���VIr'�S,�Jy Nd r, rF. 'V r rR�t�`•, l�� r�t �ar�f' t p� ILL i •r,,:.i• e1: .rk v—r • i • LOU EN,ILI I 1 1 ■ SINGLE STEM PURPLELEAF ■ SAND CHERRY PRUNUS MAACKII ®� 1 1 1 ■ ■M ® jmill= DECIDUOUS OLD � ®� E� BLACK HAWK EUROPEAN ■: ®� ��BAILEY COMPACT REDMOND LINDEN GREENSPIRE LITTLE LEAF IN oil ME ELM. No IN IN IN \1R�1 I■ min Mill will ■1l IBM -011 In Effl EA Ell F PEN ■ ■" 9 WIN NIS1■y =1NO ���MIN LOT 8 ISO No ■Ell long 1■ 1 IliumIrd 0 /� �� i►y' EXTSTTN i 1 111111■� l '■ tii ��� to Nis ME MIN Ell 1• Nis ON ■1l/�A\e����i���.:.Y..,Jel�?.eg^�.:.� ..r;,komn�a _�____ �.� - i�+IL __ ., ._�_�-+�f�■■■� l�■ii■Ei i yin mmilal'a�a�niiziL iiiiiiau��ii�ia�iiii l ��ll iiii�■ iiiiiiiiii iiiii_iii�rl�l����l��l�lll� IIIIIVIIVII ail■■■, ^1 ���� _ �■■ ■■; ■\ ���!� �r �..R!,�����.�-a��._-�.._��a - ■■�_ A I� II■....._...-..ems.. �� ��_,_a■■r�■■��■■i.>t■f�■■ ■■i■c■■ ■■" ���I�■■■■� ' ■■■■r�■■Il■■■■■IiiaE>t■■■■1�■■I>t■■■■■■�■.■■1 IIe�N����ll■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 Iy�q rlr�� ��rdili■■■�I�■■ ■ ! ■\ %■■ ■■fr?I■11�F,��� �����IHIVI���I��II�\■■■I�li����������������1���■■■■1►_■I�■■■■k! '_I•■■■■\\��■■■Flogs■■■■I�u��l�l��� !�BlllllliiAll■►I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■II�����I�I���I��� ■ 1� (`r ` I/� ■1� .. ' c`�... ��I�.�1� �eeeee�e ■Qi� ; eee�.��u�e 1 LOT MINa �� 11 IEk.' �IOcc iii I IIIII 1 • • 1 ■■ III /; ■ , NOR 0010 �\ Ilil ■ ■:- 11 ■■ -. . 1 1 -=■■ .� ■ � la �, IIIII�I i t ii PRIM Ell: NOR R0601? I! min N /;�■■ II! �ii � ii No N NIX 11 Ell ME PEN MIN INS Ell OT Ell • ■r =901 A RUB \ill N �I NOR N111�� `• �.: �\■■ ■ ■1� �. F iiiI� i\■■ ��I�IIIIVINIP' ' �IIIIIIVh�■■ ■N■■C_':�I■■ 7■■■■IN■Is1�■■■■■_la�I�C!■■I�11■�IdW■■■A®■iiS■�I�iC■■■■Etiiiit(�i ■■■■■■:■I■�■9VIiVIIi IIaVRIE■■■■■/��JY■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 e� I�eee1■ _ 111WSol wN r `i®rri � �� Freer ree►v L ` Vii - . ---- �1■■■■11�■■■■■�i�'��■■■■■fi1,f.�lii■■■■■■►:�7�■■■■■PN Y■fi■■Iliil■■qla��■■®■■dll'31■■■■■iis�l�l��■� ■��r�'�y�N■■■■■■■■■■H�n�.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I i ei ei � 5 � � • N®RTH • 1• PRUNUS CISTENA .• ..D ® r- rll - 1 1 1 PRUNUS MAACKII CANADA RED CHOKECHERRY CELTIS lENTALIS COMMON ® JAPANESE TREE LILAC ® OLD r I 1 1 FRAXINUS 'NORTHERN TREASURE'— NORTHERN TREASURE ASH ®M PRAIRIE SPIRE ASHl l GOLDFINGER PDTENTILLA ®� BLACK HAWK EUROPEAN BAILEY COMPACT • • i r 1�1 r=�� �S///�/■■I■■■■\\■■r■■1111'�1■!'Si■■■fr!J■E:1■■■i�!■■I■■■■\!1■�■■■■■■■■1 '1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ � ■eee■I�i le■■■■�, �,���es��imn■■n■■n�f'_�■■n■■I��■�a■n■■�■nn■nn��l■rn■■n■■1���■�■e■eeer 't■■■e■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� � ter, ■ �;��." _- 5 l gal IN 0 IN R plow � • ■ �,roiii��■■■■IiI■■u■�lI■Ft■LI■I ��i�Ill���""■in■■K=_ �nu���■■dl■Ilu■i�.i■i■ii■■■■■�� �■■■■■ ��' :-��i■ ■■■■nn■■■gin■■■■■■I�!�1111IInINI����■■■■■�II�����������I��II� i■■►■11■■��■■■■■■e©ell „ ■fi e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 . Cam ` �Iw, • e41 y®�,I (tXtl eli' �A�N ■F� RUB ■ ��ir i� h► Mai CRT ii' IIII► •" --SEE Mirk !�1� I�j IIIII �■li .LOT i�t IIII / MlJT ROCK MULC ON i :•ME w.- !I TURF al c_•__:. !!! PARKING AND ME MELOT AMENDED BY LOT ANN .r ? Iiil • IIII I F NIGr�..�y�, r ��■ • �" � � ii I IIII u�, *�ia� n��� �" � 1�1 No No fl— ME .• i �ioirri ���+ • ,�� it _I/ir ■. • ��� : Ent ■ ■- • 1 11 91 M� l i /, �� i� 1/I _ ■�' ■ME i 17 A RUB M am *r. = ;,F."PIP, MCIiON 01 ME �' iRl� ,I SPIN M■ '_NO ■� p ■Eoil � ■■I ■_ r 9 ■■ �■■_��` .. q■■\ �! �1�■rS■■L■■It■\\'■■I■■11■L'■■!! ■11■fr!!■■■■11■RBI■■IIIIIIII■\■■■►I■■■■\■■►I■■I■■IL■■R■■I■■itlil■■■��� ! �:����■■■■■■■■■■■■■■����il ■_ 4+l'L'��1+:�. I. '�`;��!��"��■Y'I■�I>t�[A■�Y7�■Il��■■�;tll��■0■■�.1���1■IIIIIIIIPY�■■II■■■■I■7■■■■[A■fY7■I■1■�■If'7■F7■■� 8a ■■■�Al 1311 ■■�■■�� ''�lya�-��11��;�\\\��/��e_��:�������////rn•nr�J �Jhh �—ICI■►=rlFr ►ram e.,���w•l�� �� c.a��R.-� r,� iia�.■ ��ia� Rl��� w��ve►�. uoir... r�. `��•� 6.���Q�� ��� ������• 5���� u_r 1 r13Ea_iiii��ii•@�s_�iita�:ieyr.��Jc���.������� ■I� . . 12=1 1 11 - r•' ..� •-- : '_�l:C�illiic�le:�u�f.�a�`e�u)=a>■:1�Si�■!::_�l�iill •���_ _ ■ : �� � �''• ��'�'e� iii �o���o���aa��� �T �s��r:T - di�ii / ire �!!�� .� .:�i�//�i/�i/,.%Lra�rir.��=�'-awri,•�r�'�i�i/a/�/„� �ou�.a��,.fir.�'I�rraaa-aa`I��'�1�'isw�/aii�/. �®®� �;��� 11 `` r.��r— ■■ l+ r4a7■llllll■L"■■n■■■■LJ■■ ■r7■■'"J■C�■'.`■RiJ■ ■■■■■■■e� ■■■■■■■►1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� e AN■■■�1�■■.r■■II■c�■■1�■L l■�■■ ■■ ■I71■■�°I4 ■ �■.�.►.►■■■■nn■■■■■■■■■��1■n■��■■11■Fa���■►ulml■v;�s■.�s■■�r.�■►�■■■■n■■w�n■■��a■■■■■■nee t�i(��■.�■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i Eke 00 �� ��. I�■�I, ,_ II ■- �C� 99 ■- lili i ii� �WE ■ HE l�Rl! IIII =��� ■ ■ ' P-11 11 !� tlJ ■111 No NORTH LANDSCAPE PLANS 1 OWN SHEET 4 OF 5 � i L NOV - 4 2003 DEMM'XIT Of PLANNING ITN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY SUBMITTAL PHASE TWO 4 NOVEMBER 2003 ■ COLLABORATIVE BJTFr DESIGN ' 0 ARCHITECTSz t CITY OF BOZEMAN. . DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING:,- 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P. O. BOX 1230,BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771-12,30 (406) 582-2260;FAX(406) 582-2263 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN P.U:D. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Certain uses,while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may,under certain circumstances,be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This review will also include a review for Certificate of Appropriateness, if applicable. Deviations and/or variances will be processed concurrently. Additional submittal materials apply. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: Baxter Meadows Development PO Box 11060; Bozeman, Montana 59719 Phone: 406-585-9616 2. Name and mailing address of applicant: Baxter Meadows Development PO Box 11060; Bozeman, Montana 59719 Phone: 406-585-9616 3. Name and mailing address of representative: Jerry Williams ; PO Box 11060; Bozeman, Montana 59719 Phone: 406-585-9616 4. Name and mailing address of Engineer/Architect/Planner: Collaborative Design Architects, Inc. 2280 Grant Road, Suite C; Billings,Montana 59102 Phone: 406-248-3443 5. Name of project/development: Baxter Meadows—Phase II 6. Address of proposed development: 4598 East Baxter Lane 7. Legal description: Portions of SE 1/4& SW '/4, Sec. 34, TIS, R5E&NE '/4, Sec. 3, T2S, R5E, PMM; City of Bozeman, Gallatin County 8. Current Zoning B2/R3 Land Area: 664,443 sq.ft. or 15.3 acres 9. Describe the proposed development(use additional sheets if necessary): Phase II of Baxter Meadows Master Plan to provide additional residential lots and the first available commercial lots: - 10. Review Fee: $660.00 plus$6.00 per residential unit and/or$4.00 per 1,000 sf gross leasable non-residential floor area .This.application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and twenty(20)copies of a completed site plan(see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2"x 11" or larger than 24"x 36", folded,in individual sets not smaller than 8%"x 11"ot�larger than 8%Z"x 14"in size.. Application deadlines vary.'This application must be signed and dated by each applicant and property owner(if different) before the submittal will be accepted. I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our) knowledge. RJ, Date:(o Z Y103 Date:IV7N p1plicant's Signature It Property Owner's Signature PUMMEL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 1 CITY OF BOZEMAN • 'DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING-20 EAST OLIVE STREET . P.O. BOX 1230,BOZEMAN, MT 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX(406) 582-2363 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant: Baxter Meadows Development Date: Residential PUD—X Project: Baxter Meadows—Phase II Commercial PUD X The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development(PUD) Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items listed for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked"NO" or"N/A" (not applicable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal, staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board(DRB) agendas, followed by a City Planning Board review. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. 1. Document Requirements YES NO N/A The following information shall be presented in an 8%x 11"vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and will be organized in the following order: A. Application forms; X B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the PUD; EXHIBIT IB X C. Legal description of the site; EXHIBIT IC X D. Adjacent property owners: 1 A copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400' of the property lines of the parcel of land for,which the PUD is proposed, exclusive of public r/w; X 2 The original list shall be included in the document; X 3 Names and addresses shall be included on plain(no return address), #10 (4-1/8" x 9-1/2"), stamped envelopes; EXHIBIT ID X E. A statement of planning objectives, including: (1) Statement of.applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved:by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; X-- . (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and.applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD;. X PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 2 YES NO N/A • (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses; X (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; X (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use;the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion;the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; X_ (6). Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated; X (7) Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g. m home/business,utilities,transportation fuel,waste • recycling); EXHIBIT IE X F. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the PUD, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed,including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; X EXHIBIT IF G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8'/2 x 11" or 11" x 17" size. X 2. Site Plan Requirements YES NO N/A The site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale not greater than 1" = 40' or less than 1" = 100; and composed of one(1)or more sheets not larger than 24'x 36", showing the following information: A. Name of project/development; X EXHIBIT 2A Location of project/development by street address; X EXHIBIT 2A C. Location map; including area within one (1)mile of site; X_ EXHIBIT 2E D. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; X EXHIBIT 2A E. Name and mailing address of engineer/architect; X_ EXHIBIT 2A F. Date of plan preparation; X EXHIBIT 2A G. North point indicator; X EXHIBIT 2A H. Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; X EXHIBIT 2A I. . Listing of specific land uses being proposed; X EXHIBIT 2A PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 3 YES NO N/A • J. Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; X_ EXHIBIT 2B K. Total number,type, and density per type of dwelling units; X EXHIBIT 2B T L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel; X EXHIBIT 2B M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (Floor Area Ratio,FAR), with a breakdown by land use; X EXHIBIT 211 N. Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel(s) and total site, including the following: (1) Percentage and square footage of building coverage; X (2) Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking; X (3) Percentage and square footage of public street r/w; X • (4) Percentage and square footage of open space and/or landscaped area; X (5) Percentage and square footage of Active recreational use area; X_ EXHIBIT 2B O. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest,handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking,with typical dimensions of each; _X__ EXHIBIT 2B P. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals,unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; X EXHIBIT 2A Q. ' Watercourses,water bodies and irrigation ditches; X EXHIBIT 2A R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; X WAIVED S. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than 21/2, by species; X EXHIBIT 2B T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; X EXHIBIT 2B U. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active recreational use; X EXHIBIT 2B V.. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks, recreationaf areas, school sites,and similar uses; X EXHIBIT 2B W. Location of existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; X EXHIBIT 2B X. Maximum building height of all structures; X EXHIBIT 2C PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 4 YES NO N/A •. Y. The existing proposed and ro osed circulation system of arterial, collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading'. zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the development; notations of proposed ownership,public or private,should be included where appropriate; X EXHIBIT 2B /RPA SUBMITTAL Z. Existing zoning; X EXHIBIT 2D AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials and techniques used, such as screening,fences,walls, and other landscaping; X EXHIBIT 31119 3112 BB. Proposed signage,with locations and illustrative examples; X EXHIBIT 211 CC. Adjacent site information: Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200' of the proposal, exclusive of public r/w at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: X (1) Land uses and location of principle structures; X . (2) Densities of residential uses; X . (3) Existing trees and major features of landscape; X (4) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals,unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; X (5) Traffic Circulation System; X EXHIBIT 2A DD. Supplemental vicinity map: Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one (1) mile showing: (1) Zoning districts; X (2) Location of municipal boundary lines; X (3) . Traffic circulation system; X (4) Major public facilities including schools,parks,trails, etc.; X_ EXHIBIT 2E EE. Attorney's or owner's(s')certification of ownership; X_ EXHIBIT 2F FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the City Planning Board and Zoning Commission certification of approval of the site plan, including a statement of any variances to the Community.Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100; X EXHIBIT 2G GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan; X Will be provided when conditions are setforth. PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 5 YES NO N/A • 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements A. Architectural elevations: Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; X_ EXHIBIT 3A B. Landscape treatment: A general landscaping plan indicating: (1) Treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces; X (2) All existing vegetation with identification of trees by sizes of species; X (3) Specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction; X (4) The scale shown on plant materials; X EXHIBIT 3B1 &3B2 C. Utility plans: The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: (1) Sanitary sewers; X (2) Storm sewers; X (3) Water; X (4) Electric; (5) Gas; (6) Telephone lines; (7) Fire hydrants; X (8) Trash collection areas; X EXHIBIT 3G/RPA SUBMITTAL D. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including the proposed width,treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards •f of the City are proposed; X EXHIBIT 3D E. Physiographic data, including the following: (1) A description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping; X (2) A map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100' year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City; X (3) A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table, fluctuations, and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping; X EXHIBIT 3E PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 6 YES NO N/A • F. Drainage plan: Preliminary drainage report and calculations and/or plan, including: (1) All watercourses on the property or which are located within 200' of the property, must be shown; in addition,the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated; X (2) All drainage, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways,reservoirs, etc.,which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated; X (3) All irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown; X (4)` All required on-site detention areas, including notes indicating the approximate area and volume of the facility; X (5) All plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for.the storm drainage from the property, including the name of the drainage-way (where appropriate),the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage-ways, etc.), and any downstream restrictions; X t • (6) Existing and/or proposed grading plan; X RPA SUBMITTAL G. Temporary facilities plan: A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes, . sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; X Shown in Phase I Submittal. H. Preliminary subdivision plat: If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; EXHIBIT 3F I. Traffic impact analysis: At the discretion of the Public Service Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses;the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: (1) Land use and trip generation- a table of each type of land use,the . number of units or square footage, as appropriate,the trip rates used(daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation; (2) Traffic graphics showing: (a) AM peak hour site traffic; (b) PM peak hour site traffic; (c) AM peak hour total traffic; (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately); PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 7 YES NO N/A (3) AM and PM capacity analysis: An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial, collector-collector, and arterial-collector intersections within one (1) mile of the site or as directed by the Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) Trip generation-using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual; (b) Trip distribution; (c) Traffic assignment; (d) . Capacity analysis; (e) Evaluation; (f) Recommended access plan, including access points, modifications and any mitigation techniques; (5). Additional Analysis Criteria: Appropriate clearance intervals shall be provided for each exclusive movement;pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at intersections;maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be 4' per second with a minimum "WALK"time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three(3)through lanes in each direction, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential intersections with signals will be placed on 3 mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service"C"shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service"D"be accepted for site operations; arterial;intersections and turning operations shall. operate at Level of Service"C"; if Level of Service"E" is the result of the study,then alternatives of providing Level of Service"D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally,the design year will be approximately fifteen(15)years following construction. •� (6) Summary analysis explaining: (a) The proposed access points for the project,their location. . and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation; (b) Future off-site road improvements for access,which roads they will be,the projected time frame for their completion and who is responsible for their completion; (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets; (d) How traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the PUD; (e) Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the development, if used; EXHIBIT 3G/RPA SUBMITTAL PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 8 • J. .Additional studies and plans: The City Planning Board and Zoning Commission or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed PUD; particularly if the development's compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; 4.. Reproducible Copy Requirements In addition to the above document, Site plan and Supplemental Plan. requirements the applicant shall submit the following for review purposes: * Reference to 18.54.060 A Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements@ of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance(7/02/90) Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or$4.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable industrial or'commercial (includes professional business offices) floor area. Minimum fee after refund: $500.00 CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE ATTACHED NAME AND ADDRESS LIST OF ALL. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT ,IS TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST FROM THE LAST DECLARED GALLATIN COUNTY TAX RECORDS. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT AN INACCURATE LIST MAY DELAY REVIEW OF THE PROJECT. SIGNATURE PUD.PREL PLAN APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQ October 2003 9 • BAXTER MEADOWS - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL EXHIBIT INDEX 1A Application 1 B List of Owners/Applicant 1 C Site Legal Description 1 D Adjacent Property Owners 1 E Statement of Planning Objectives 1 F Development.Schedule 2A Baxter Meadows Master Plan 2B Baxter Meadows Phase II Plan 2C Building Heights and Setbacks 2D Existing Zoning 2E Vicinity Map 2F Certification of Ownership .2G Statement of Variances 3A Architectural Elevations 361 Landscape Plan —Streets 362 Landscape Plan—Parks 3C Power/Gas/Communications Plan 3D Street Cross Sections • 3E Physiographic Data 3F Preliminary Subdivision Plat 3G Traffic Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 1 B BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE 11 October 2003 OWNER/APPLICANT Baxter Meadows Development Jerry Williams 4598 East Baxter Lane 'PO Box 11060 Bozeman, Montana 59719 406.585.9616 (Office) 406.587.9137 (Fax) Billings Office Baxter Meadows Development Jerry Williams PO Box 81487 2110 Overland, Suite 127 Billings, Montana 59108-1487 406.896.4910 (Office) 406.896.4911 (Fax) EXHIBIT 1 C BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE II October 2003 SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION • PHA 11 BOUNDAPW LENGTH & BEARING TABLE ID LENGTH BEARING RADIUS ANGLE (Q) 1 1022.00 N0018'3"W 2 450.67' N89°41 '57"E 3 568.04' S0620'59"W 4 799.96' N89043'14"E 5 100.38' N3'51 '31 "W 6 80.56' N1 031 '51 "E 7 87.85' N27052'1 YE 8 106.74' N39029'45"E 9 51 .87' N17°55'37"E 10 100.29' N 1 °19'34"W 11 41 .93' N4031 '49"E 1 108.84' N 14°3'40"E 1 215.21 ' N89°41 '57"E 4 679.92' N89°43'3"E 15 857.93 S00559"W 16 147.13' N89041 '25"E 1 313.50' S0011 '28"E 18 140.53' S89041 '57"W 19 679.02' S0016'42"E 450.73' S89041 '57"W 21 1104.48' S0018'3"E 302.78' 291 .73' 59027'52" 110.83' 455.00' 13055'8" 366.00' N52°17'44"W 600.50' 355.00' 96055'8" 140.67' N44°37'24"E 268.70' 345.00' 44037'24" 191 .53' NORTH 74.75' S89°41 '57"W 760.02' NO°18'1 "W 31 1390.11 ' S89°41 '57"W I II ' 9 I -- ' LLi 8 4 I 4 16 #10.5 � I ' II 202 � - ------------- 7.77' -- #15 I / 1 I w ` N 17 ZI • EXHIBIT I BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE II October 2003 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Baxter Meadows Development 4598 East Baxter Lane Bozeman, Montana 59719 Andrew Malucelli 3611 Gallatin Green Bozeman, Montana 59719 Joshua Oberly and Rebecca Pierce 3629 Gallatin Green Bozeman, Montana 59719 Aaron and Erin Yost 3647 Gallatin Green Bozeman, Montana 59719 John Carter 3659 Gallatin Green Bozeman, Montana 59719 Anthony & Robert Brendgard .3675 Gallatin Green Bozeman, Montana 59719 Karen Flowers 3697 Gallatin Green Bozeman, Montana 59719 3567 and 3641 Gallatin Green and 3879 Bosal are currently pending. CERTIFICATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, JEFFERY A. KANNING, COLLABORATIVE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, INC., APPLICANT OF THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE ATTACHED NAME AND ADDRESS LIST OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT BAXTER MEADOWS-PHASE II AS SHOWN ON PRELIMINARY APPLICATION, IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST FROM THE LAST DECLARED GALLATIN COUNTY TAX RECORDS. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT AN INACCURATE LIST MAY DELAY REVIEW OF THE PROJECT. • IGNATUR OF PPLICANT DATE • EXHIBIT I BAXTER MEADOWS —PHASE II October 2003 STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; This application does constitute an improvement to the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan. The current and future economic outlook for Bozeman and the Gallatin Valley remains strong as many existing and potential businesses look to locate or expand their operations here. While the economic benefits are significant, the critical issue is how to facilitate this anticipated growth without compromising the values and sense of community that make Bozeman such a unique and wonderful place to both live and work. This request will facilitate development to occur around smart-growth principals that will allow a balance between quality of life issues and future phases. ♦ Neiahborhoods: Approval of this application will allow Baxter Meadows to center development around three distinct neighborhoods: The commercial/activity neighborhood (future phases), low-density residential neighborhood, and the medium to high-density neighborhood. These neighborhoods work together serving a variety of housing, service, and recreational needs facilitating the sense of community. ♦ Transportation: Approval of this application will allow alternative modes of transportation such as walking, bikina,and transit to be developed together with the automobile rather than solely on the automobile. ♦ Mixed-Use: Approval of this application will allow a diverse mix of activities, including shopping, living,working and recreating all within walkina distance to each other. ♦ Open Space: Approval of this application will allow significant open space, including the proposed 100-acre regional park, neighborhood parks, equestrian area, wetlands, and trails system. By focusing on proven smart-growth concepts, Baxter Meadows will provide the critical balance of growth opportunities for business while enhancing the quality of life for its residence. The benefits of this development will be felt throughout the community. (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant(s) intentions with regard to future ownership o fall or portions of the PUD: The neighborhood green, pocket parks and linear parks will be privately owned and maintained by Baxter Meadows Development until Homeowners Association is formed. • Exhibit 1 E—Baxter Meadows Page 2 Statement of Planning Objectives October 2003 • (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and industrial uses: Trakker Technologies—5 Employees Remainder of Neighborhood Center to be determined. (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant: Baxter Meadows has been designed as a neo-traditional community. Baxter Meadows will be a mixed-use community. The master plan was designed to Promote a pedestrian friendly environment- Minimizing the impervious surface and providing narrow streets have accomplished this. This will slow down the traffic, making it safe for pedestrians. The plan also minimizes the impact of the garage by providing alleys or side entry garages or placing the garages off of courtyards. (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described: This is addressed in the Checklist and Drawings. • (6) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated: There should be no conflicts between land uses in Phase I. The plan has been designed as one neighborhood. .(7) Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumptions, (e.g. — home/business, utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling): The plan will be in compliance to the Montana Energy Code and Building_ Construction. The site plan is designed to minimize impervious surfaces. Energy efficient appliances should be used. The plant material selected will be drought and fire tolerant and low water usage. Streetlights will be selected for low energy consumption. • EXHIBIT IF BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE 11 October 2003 DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Baxter Meadows Phase IIA Final Plat Approval January 2004 Improvements Construction March-July 2004 .Baxter Meadows Phase IIB Final Approval June 2005 Improvements Construction June-November 2005 Baxter Meadows Phase I I C Final Approval January 2007 Improvements Construction March-July 2007 I i Moroi mca I 9 I 0 1 O 1 ' _L L I L I 0 N I r m (P 1I II m I I I I Lora Lar» 1 r r I La n ra La $ 91 Lana Lary _ '° Lars gar: I 1 1 I L I L01 L0T1a LOT Lars I I Lort4 I 1 Lare LJ1[IJ Lane Lora y GS Y d m y 41 e 51 m I I pr T I l i r _ O I c ` r / V is O1 Q r Co ('n 0 / r r � � `� r ' 1 t; ► N H N cn Co 9 (: r O .. - A 2 1 2Mpg WS D 4�MEADOW„ E EST%78 COLLABORATIVE rn � DESIGN E*W F-1 1g ARCHITECTS PHASE 2 SRE PLAN 22eo av xr ROAD•suTE c•ro BOX 80407 0 ealmae,►y�T.SMO- 4 I I 4••)24a� . PAX 4CN)24Er�7tu• •M MITHUN ' An31itDeslgllern+Plannels Pi"56 l DEAD MAN'S GULCH I � `x'4' Suttk wA yR,m ESTATE LOTS .�t-1Y.'s`�ra'1' -.}• ""i Y. - ,.`y LINEAR @ 2-4 DU/AC PARK `A ?A; WET;. LAND.; tc 41 OPEN CEr PWAReoFux k Williams Brothers TRANSITIONAL DENSITY Construction,LLC Clustered & Detached Units, Duplex �. &Townhomes k � BARTER MEADOWS HOTv , oHv MEDIUM DENS ITY/MULTI-FAMIL _ LOCATION: Detached Units, Townhomes, Bozeman,Montana �_ Live Work& Stacked Flats Y @ 8-14 DU/AC / — NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE OL " Retail, Office, Medium Density Housing o a` l 10-18 DU/AC Project I { Master Plan EOUESTRIAN �,. < vIUAGE CENTERGREEN , _ ---- ,, ..;: --- NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL IT - Retail, Office, Hotel, Community ��. PoCKET -,i l Services, High Density Housing � - -- PARK COMMUNITY CENTER & BED & BREAKFAST BARTER LANE ' O a� PHASE I OE &BREAKFAST CENTER/D c \ eflEAKFAsr ' VETERINARY 0 LOO 2M 400 ''J - NU EQUESTRIAN CENTER LF,BS HBORHOO -- a BLS O PARK N �S,BK,LF,JW, N �_- COMMUNITY PARKS Cr LL � PROPOSED REGIONAL PARK OPEN SPACE/WETLANDS PROPOSED REGIONAL PARK d 01 2w PHASE I � :4/01 OAK STREET I I Tm SET !' � COPYRIGHT 0200i MffHUN,INC. P I jW -ON1 Ca . ��\ � ■ram_� ���� .. � I . • , - ' ,, II ��� ``�'i; •4 �+ -�._ III0 go ow �� , ,�, � '"'�i �i �.�����`' � '� rI � ,.fir• � � � ,.� .� _ ,_ �� � 1 ��� t�� �♦ �Ii�� �i ► . �11■■Il m I� �� �. , I, LIM MR AM �- , ;, � � I �\ Ir � �.,_ � Ili- �� _ :; �- II�;� • '�� � ����� ���� � �I �':�� /1 I -1�',I��,. �i; �• .I@ �I, . ir.tl 11111RGRfI11Ti► .I■ '� ��:i,�', Famli ;�� ��1� ; - h ■��I!I�I � ,►�1111.PAP ■�. .�■�I�Ia I I:.I Ara _.. .r► �� �� �1�► ...�,.�� - — _-�•.�;••���i��,�.�j�1__�_��r�!��l_ 1L�4���M � � ������ ���.�1_I���I �. i�� 1_!�I�_ �,� NMI%, 1 _ - ��� PROJECT NO. .. CHECKED 'DATES PRE: - . w5. O PH m� -- - - --�-- U� 4 L- J V 8 __-- - - _ _ -- -- _ - J�Q . i t �1 � r r �r �r � ] - r ow x� 1 1 I I I all�o BAXTER LANE o& MATCH LINE LL eEE oa-Wr aai r I 2003 Mrt�Ogw.NHO N. OPRiIV�06 w.�. p�FO�OIOE pFGnMWp CONNSEHi OF COWBOY p�M61�N�� � I COMMON OPEN AREA MAOR BEN ATI SPACE) I ''�' 0 W ICL co z 1 0WQ ®wz Z 1 W N � WM � N Q00o�pN M =_ a. TRACT rwo r SET: 15.mm ACRE - ` PROJECT NO. 0201.8 '. DRAWN BY: Cf CHECKED BY: JK DATES PRE: ` CRS: ImRB/m3 FHA5E TWO BOUNDAfPY COS: REV: REV: SHEET PHA5E 2 FART 1,4L SITE PL,4N 2 B-2 --� I-- —� I I I PHASE TWO �3OUND,41R'r 5A BA ER MEADOXTER LANE E DEVELOPMENT - PHASE 2 `� I ' AST BOSEMAN,MONTANA 59118 I I 1 STREAM , I I I 1 JERRY WILLIAMS ' KIMBERWICKE ST. OWNERI 'ONI ---.L.- ----� L---J -- - --� I W KIMBERWICKE ST. ,COMMON oPEN1AREA I Po Box NmO co 1 25m,186.14 SP(5.1 6 ACRE) BOSEMAN,MONTANA 59�19 > d --� ----� I -- - --� I I COLLABORATIVE DESIGN ARCHITECTS ARCHITECT 7 T I 2280 GRAN T ROAD W@ -- ` SUITE C I 1 BILLINGS,MONTANA 591CA2 O T ITIITI N ES /I � --------- ' 6 PA NO SPACES H I ' m r I i W 1 1 II I I �') DATE of PREPARATION: z U 1 I ; �« a a 1 B T I MO t EA V Q 22smjmlLeF(m.ms Ac ) , I I NORTH POINT INDICATOR.- Cam 1 r--1 ACTIVE �� (n CREATION i i i i i REFERENCED ON PLANS • 1 ' I 5a5m aF COMMON OPEN AREA II I I I O W x II--T I I -�- 1 I I I I I I ; 12 124.538F(m.29AGI ) f -- I I -- PAR3E�L�59ZEOCPHASE 2): ' ` Q �n I (RE TATIVE 8PACE) v �----- / 15.63 ACRES I �-� --- / OFF-STREET ACTIv IRECRE2, f15 N N MINIUMS / rl�ARKING f SPECIFIC LAND USE/UNIT SUMMARY IN ZONE R-3 0 2 PARICI G ES PER UNIT PApCING SPACES TYPE TOTAL UNITS PER AVERAGE AVERAGE FAR BG9E T MG SPACES 2 HANDICAPPED j I I �I NUMBER ACRE FLOOR AREA LOT 612E 9 _ a TRADITIONAL HOME. 28 3.07 2,284.67 BE 8,220.28 SF 1 3.60 y ' I ! SUN L W HOMES / I VILLAGE HOMES 6 6.23 1,720.83.E 5,673.65 SF 3.30 _ 6UNGALC!N HOMES 21 7.32 1.247.F 3,190.07 SF 1:2.56 2PARICI PACES PER HOME ""' - _ / — J COTTAGE HOMES 8 11,94 905.365E 2,256.756E 1:2.49 LL 2 I I I 1 ! TOTAL GROSS RESIDENTIALDENSITY:4.45 UNITS PER ACRE Q• I \ RAWHIDE STREET ----- -- SPECIFIC LAND USE/UNIT SUMMARY IN ZONE B-2 WHIDE STREE p 1 \ \ \ \ TYPE TOTAL UNITS PER AVERAGE ESTIMATED FAR g' �J NUMBER ACRE FLOORAREA TOTAL LOT SIZE ` UNI CONDOMINIUMS 20 9.09 867.635E 20,245.85 1:1.17 y B- A / I LIVE/WORK TBD 7�V¢QRj I COMMERCIAL TBD Z 2 ' _ _ U I I I I PROPOSED COVERAGE OF STRUCTURES Q^ v-I ' Q I ' T i r I _ I / -----� i T -- TOTAL R-3 ZONE SITE: -115,338.43 SF A$ y - -2 I _ I I ' BUILDING COVERAGE: Q , F I _ __ ' I (7 l / I _ _--!__ _I 11.29%OF TOTAL R-3 ZONE AREA LIJ 1 r 3 I Z w -- - 123,683.89 OF C 2003 Q O _ _J III I lJ I � --- B-I Z / -- µEsc oocu"Exs,rt vn8r oe IN vmole, ' 1 I c c ' ' ' DRIVEWAY AND PARKING COVERAGE: °c vrs`o�i"S10ir"o':�cauaOMI. ' O ' ° -p I F- / ' - ' 1.mb%OF TOTAL R-3 ZONE AREA „a,wnxou.?T " O 3 Q NIT I I sm 4l9 93 OF v R' 2 _ I I A ' / -� COMMON OPEN AREA CoN�gE q�� T T�l E SrtE NdGtEO ,^ G O — — — 1 _^___�__ __ I Mcx"ccrscis FRIiM1Y vn xlmnn." VJ I 1 I 1 J I 1 PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY COVERAGE: I T I Y B z'c I c c I ' 1 94,266.34 SP(2.16 ACRE) 3a.14%OF TOTAL R-3 2.ONE AREA <3 I Q J ' I Q I I I ' __� --• 21',145.18 SP 1 W (� OFFI-STR� T PAtINCx / _-- lJ 1 I OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPED COVERAGE: I _---- - -- 2 PARING PACES 1 1 1 1.58%OF TOTAL R-3 ZONE AREA ' Marc I I, 2 HANDI APF£D ' 11,324.13 BF --�--- m. x CF TOTAL R-3 ZONE AREA ACTIVE RECREATIONAL USE COVERAGE: � ---__ {{qq I�C 98Lm2 SF � TOTAL 5-2 ZONE SITE: 2,519,300.10_-F ;IAN LANE Q L Ir�� BUILD g�gC%O�TOTAL 5-2 ZONE AREA p VI AGE HOMES I 3ADDI7IONAL TO BE DETERMINED A ING 8 AGES PER HOME 1 ' 'Q OM ON OP A A ST E A IN / � W I= 1.1.1 I I / I I I I I DRIVEWAY AND PARKING COVERAGE: co N O EN AREA 1 Ilrlbii-59°Ti 1(A.29,ACRE) I I I 21 PAW.JN SPACHS I I ' I 2.56%OF TOTAL B-2 ZONE AAA 1 11,mb.5 OF(0.It,ACRE) j i 1 66/m69.63 8F Q N �-�__I __JAPM L_�__�l__J ADDITIONAL TO BE DETERMINED � LYL 1 RIBLIG STREET RIGHT OF WAY COVERAGE•• d _ —_ _ Q __ __ _ IIr = 969,463.53 SF TAL B-2 ZONE AREA Z I J / I — COTTAGE HOMES I ''� I-- — O — OPEN SPpACE/LANDSCAPED COVERAGE: V, 0 2 PARKING SPACES PER HOME I W _ / I I 1 1 I C.= 21.m1%OF TOTAL B-2 ZONE AREA Q Z _ _.. Q I I E I I E 543,311.Im SF O W Q I — Q 1I - - ACTIVE RECI�ATIGNAL USE COVERAGE: O BEET --— - . . L_1- m.zm x oP TOTAL B-2 ZONE AREA x a 525m SF 1 16 PARKING SPACE �- 2 HANDICAPPElD w - �� W O ' TF�K R TRAIL TEMPORARY SIGN LOCATIONS. ,{ co EEXISTIN / - -�-- -� I 8 WcQ cm Im N KER F3UILDIN I I I I I — I I 1 1 1 I — -a15,961.m3 SFi I I I 1 I I I I / / I I 1 C= TYPICAL TEMPORARY v ^m Q HEIGHT-4m'-m" — _ SIGN LOCATION N --- - --I-- _ -- =_L=J m m W _ _ _ _ _ _ PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION SYSTEM POINTS OF CONFLICT CL O - BEET PARKIN V>=P_ CRE�T PRK�NG f 1 r �R TO CIRCULATION ANALYSIS 1S PARKING SPACE 1 I I I I I 1 I , I I I HANDICAPPED, I I 16 PARKING BPACE9 I I I I I I / I , I I SET' 1 H IGA D / PROJECT N0. CD2�1.8 DRAWN BY: CRE Al '� BAXTER LANE CHECKED BY: DATES -� MATCH LINE COMMERCIAL LOTS PRE` - -� r1 SEE EXI•BIT2B-2 BUILDINGS TO BE DETERMINED CRS: I0/28/03 I V�ml f I CDS: REV: - E� REV: r I SHEET: 1=445E 2 51TE PL,4N 2B-1 ,'4WHIBIT 2C M TER MEADOWS— PHASE II October 2003 BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS Product Zoning Lot Area Lot Lot Floor Area Front Rear Side Max. Width Coverage Yards Yard Yard Height Cottage R-3 2584* 38'* 42%* 500-700 101* 21* 51* 25'-0" Bungalows R-3 2688* 42'* 52%* 1200—2200 10'* 21* 5' 38'-0" Villages R-3 4094* 46'* 55%* 2000—2350 10'* 2'* 5' 38'-0" Traditional R-3 7425 82.5' 29% 3000—3650 14'* 51* 51* 38'-0° 5-Plex B2 19900 114' 46% 8672 101* 61* 0' *VARIES FROM CHAPTER 18 Commercial Lots: B-2 4678 s.f.— 52'* 100%* TBD 01* 00* 00* 75' 295,937 s.f. � I , z ----I -------------------------------------------------------=-----� _ ------------------------------------ ------------- -- � j 1 1 1 1 I - ICI ml I sl � li 1 I r ' II 1 1 m 1 FERGUSON ROAD ' - -_�__---- ---------------J J - - ---I I - -- --I JT1.111 0_I1[]Il_I�_D I �� LJy LJ ; 1 J t _ I__�11TtL. .. . . .. I_C.. _ I ' I 1 I -Tf ' '• — 41— — I J -I- 1 I P T j I ' . ------------------------------H �------ -------- -----------DAMS ROAD -------------- ------1 �- 1 1 co 0 1 1 p PHASE 11i��=� COLLABORATIVE N rn D MEADOWS i DESIGN a exrwo zordra �� • ARCHITECTS= N A,� OIiANT ROAD a HUII'E C e PO BOX 80467 a BIWNOB.MT.61ig8-04d7 E (406) 248-044.i o FAX (408)248-3705 a E-MALj CONCEPTH*WrPNET • • ITHU ArdJv,a+�0ef¢Iarn+Pla rv:cn m,Alaabn Wry S'ftmw $em1e,WA 9b._ a; J to m6 WSAN w m6 6a})oos N N trait z 4X N ZOc G N J Z m v 20N[NG AS J J � PREPARED Port SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL — ¢ S mm n of Trail Court a Williams Brothers a Construction AS 0 0 AS AS RESIDENTIAL M-1 ± 1035 Cerise Road RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL Dead s Gulch Ct. Billings,Montana 59101 B-2 NI/2, NV1/4, S 1/4 PUBC! ZONING-URBAN AS Orville Way .pc y C �PEAa SPACE RESIDENTIAL BP AS M-1 BAXTER MEADOWS v M-1 z 3 0 ZONING: AS Q v Lounac r9 Ra 3 Bozeman,Montana RURAL RESIDENTIAL QO�2 RS H Y SVI/4, SEC. 34 ti 7 y SE1/4, SEC. 4 L p( CRE w&L c E COS NO.2202 - _�=Q� -C a'1 COS NO.2202 AS in 0. ti� 2Z RESIDENTIAL M-1 r M-1 m al.r ZONING: A ^, c j Z�q URBAN RS Boothill Ct. a J47 N S RESIDENTIALPLI z = y cr BP S R-1 M-1 Baxter Lane CITY LIMITS v c- L CITY UMITS INSTITUTION -- �•• ZONING, AS r ZONING: A M-1 URBAN n URBAN AS RESIDENTIAL o ESIDENT.IA R-3 AS RESIDENTIAL z RESIDENTIAL u M-1 t -0 _ NE1/4. SEC. 3 �' CITY UUITS I B-2 COS NO.2202 R-3 S FUTURE OAK STREET Oak St. 1 i r Ma lewood St I 4 a �R-2-A in R-3 1 _ i ®LTI1 0 z .� R-3 a i ` } -2- m N Stevens BK 1 LF.BS 1 St. K 0 t BS Wind - ^ ' � — BS,IF.BKJW S R-0 m -2 Z INRIALS / o _ N R-4 v s Terrace Ave- . ° B-1 ° Q. .o.. Durston Rd. ® — z harlotte z Be ; dBS p. Exhibit R_4 cro e R-3 Map R -A - HR- A } VICI(llt,lToole St• 00 o R 3 a Y,for - I t• yin �m �' zzzzz z = 4 UND VICINITY AND EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE NOT TOSCALE 01236.00 10/16/01 CTCACOPYRIGHT zom t� w..aI`<. -----u.s�__._-acn:m c,o ___aiam__..__ pC"I A D�/OR1GS i �NGROUPKS ILA K s Me ' L"USEAPE ARCNrECTURC crA:6 �4•RSv__-_.-Rd0 v L KL RICalS RESMEU 9ci NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION copyw „„ W„tt,n.„4C ` EXHIBIT 2F BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE 11 October 2003 CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP I certify that I, Gerald R. Williams, Baxter Meadow Development, L.P., am the owner of Baxter Meadows, Phase II as described in the attached legal description (Exhibit 1 C). Baxter Meadows Development, L.P. Gerald R. Williams General Partner EXHIBIT 2113 BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE 11 October 2003 STATEMENT OF VARIANCES -ZONING -Section 18.50.080 Street Vision Triangle Current Requirement: Local Streets—40' from curb line Variance Requested: Local Streets—40' from bulb-out curb line Affected Property: Intersections of private, local streets in the.Neighborhood Center. The bulb-outs provided aid in traffic calming, slowing down the traffic in the Neighborhood Center. All intersections are private, local streets and are controlled intersections. Section 18.50.110 Parking Current Requirement: No backing into Public R.O.W. Variance Requested: Diagonal Parking • Affected Property: Local streets in the Neighborhood Center Diagonal parking provides more on-street parking than parallel parking. Drive aisle widths have been increased per code standards. Section 18.50.120 Off-Street Loading Berth Current Requirement: Off-street required > 15,000 s.f. Variance Requested: Alley Access Affected Property: Blocks 16-21 Alleys have been provided for service in every block. Delivery and trash collection will happen here. • EXHIBIT 2G BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE II October 2003 STATEMENT OF VARIANCES R3 Zoning Section 18.20.030 Lot Area and Width Current Requirement: Lot Area: 5,000 s.f. Lot Width: 50' Variance Requested: Lot Area: 2,432 s.f. —3,168 s.f. Lot Width: 25'—48' Affected Property: Lots 1-16, Block 12 Village Homes Lots 1-26 Block 13 Bungalows and Cottages Phase II is a continuation of the Baxter Meadows Master Plan to provide a neo-traditional neighborhood based on Smart Growth principals. By designing smaller properties, Baxter Meadows provides: ♦ A variety of dwelling types that enables younger and older people, singles and families, the • poor and rich to have equal access to a place to live. ♦ Dwellings within a five-minute walk of the Neighborhood Center. ♦ Pocket parks, linear parks and other open space within 1/8 mile of every dwelling unit. ♦ Streets that are a connected network to provide a variety of itineraries and help disperse traffic congestion. ♦ Relatively narrow streets shaded by trees. This slows down traffic, creating an environment for the pedestrian and the bicycle. ♦ Dwelling units closer to the street to create a strong sense of place and an increased sense of security. Section 18.02.040 Lot Coverage and Floor Area Current Requirement: Lot Coverage: 40% Variance Requested: Lot Coverage:46% -55%. Affected Property: Lots 1-16, Block 12 Village Homes Lots 1-26 Block 13 Bungalows and Cottages See description above. • Section 18.20.050 Yards Current Requirement: Front Yard: 20' Rear Yard: 20' Side Yard: 5' Variance Requested: Front Yard: 10'-14' Rear Yard: 2'-5' Side Yard: 5' (no change) Affected Property: Lots 1-11, Block 9 Traditional Lots 1-12, Block 10 Traditional Lots 1-8, Block 11 Traditional Lots 1-16, Block 12 Village Homes Lots 1-26 Block 13 Bungalows and Cottages See description above. These variance requests have been approved in Phase I. Section 18.50.100 Property Frontage Current Requirement: 25' on a Public Street • Variance Requested: 0' Affected Property: Lots 6-10, 12-14, Block 13 The affected properties front a Baxter Meadows Homeowner's Association owned pocket park. The park provides an easement for public utilities with a corresponding all-weather access surface for service. The surface is also suitable for emergency vehicle access. All properties have access to a City standard alley. The pocket park provides a community space for the smaller lots adjacent to it. These properties are designated for Bungalow and Cottage Homes which are the most affordable units in Baxter Meadows. The pocket park has passive as well as active recreation areas with play equipment. The landscaping is maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Section 18.54.100 Open Space Zoning PUD Open Space Requirements from Lanette Windemaker. Options for PUD Open Space Requirements ♦ Parks ♦ Watercourse Setbacks ♦ Trail Corridors • Centers, predominately Open Spaces • ♦ Storm Water Retention Facilities ♦ Anything that meets subdivision PUD Open Space Requirements r 2 • Does not count towards PUD Open Space Requirements ♦ Residential Yard Setbacks ♦ Parking Lot Interior Landscaping ♦ Centers, not predominately Open Space ♦ Anything in Public Right-of-Way/Easement ♦ Land under enclosed Space Baxter Meadows Zoning PUD Open Space Summary (30%) Phase Overall Size Net Acres Required Provided Percentage Phase 1 66.5 ac 53.0 ac 15.6 ac 17.0 ac 32.7% Phase Ila 30.3 ac 22.3 ac 6.7 ac 6.2 ac 27.8% Phase Ilb 26.4 ac 17.4 ac 5.2 ac 6.3 ac 36.2% Phase Ilc 19.0 ac 12.6 ac 3.8 ac 0.6 ac 5.2% Phase 111 35.1 ac 22.0 ac 66 ac 0.5 ac 2.4% Phase IV 74.7 ac 57.9 ac 17.4 ac 24.2 ac 41.8% Phase V 37.8 ac 36.0 ac 10.8 ac 10.8 ac 30% Phase VI 51.2 ac 39.5 ac 11.9 ac 1 18.4 ac 146.6% 341.0 ac 260.7 ac 78.0 ac 184.0 ac 132.2% The type and size of the open space provides active and passive recreation area, wide-open and intimate park settings and areas for sedentary activities as well as walking, jogging and • bicycling trails. B2 Zoning- Section 18.30.030 Lot Area and Width Current Requirement: Minimum Width: 100, Variance Requested: Minimum Width: 46' Affected Property: Lots 1-8, Block 16 Lots 1-7, Block 17 Lots 1-10, Block 18 Lots 1-11, Block 19 Lots 1-13, Block 20 Lots 1-13, Block 21 The Baxter Meadows Neighborhood Center design is based on Smart Growth principles to provide: ♦ A discemable center. A square, green or plaza in a commercial area that is the common community-gathering place. ♦ Shops and services sufficiently varied to supply the weekly needs of a household. ♦ Streets which are an interconnected network. ♦ On-street parking, landscaping and curb-bulb-outs to effectively quiet traffic. 3 • ♦ Building which are close to the street to create a strong sense of place and synergy between the businesses. ♦ Prominent sites reserved for civic buildings for meeting, education, religion or culture. The property width and lot sizes were intentionally designed to allow for multiple lot combinations and lot line adjustments to provide flexibility for potential businesses without necessitating a replat of a parcel. This also reduces City staff time commitment in the process. By allowing the Neighborhood Center buildings to use their entire property, Baxter Meadows Is creating a pedestrian friendly community node within the greater Bozeman. By providing goods and services to meet the weekly needs of the households, cross-town car trips are reduced helping the overall traffic congestion in other areas. Section 18.30.040 Lot Coverage Current Requirement: Entire Lot exclusive of Required Yards Variance Requested: 100% Lot Coverage See affected property and justification above. Section 18.30.050 Yards Current Requirement: Front Yard: 7' Rear Yard: 10' Side Yard: 5' Variance Requested: Front Yard: 0' Rear Yard: 0' Side Yard: 0' See affected property and justification above. Section 18.30.060 Building Height Current Requirement: >3:12—44' <3:12—38' Variance Requested: 72' Affected Property: Blocks 16-21 The.success of the Neighborhood Center is dependent of the variety of mixed uses and the density to create a vibrant, active area of interaction not only during the day but also in the evenings and on the weekends. The key to this is to have multi-story buildings to provide space for retail and other business on the lower levels and dwelling units on the upper levels to keep people in the area after traditional business hours. These taller buildings will solidify the core of Baxter Meadows as a community node within the Bozeman city limits. Creation of community , • nodes within a city helps group services and products in a smaller area allowing residents to 4 • use alternate means of transportation, rather than their cars, to meet their everyday needs. Trips to other parts of town or the 'power' centers are reduced, thus lessening traffic. Section 18.50.110 Parking Requirements Current Requirement: Per Table F.2.a Variance Requested: See Exhibit 3G Section 18.49.040 General Landscape Provisions Current Requirement: Per Section 18.49.060 Variance Requested: See Exhibits 3131 and 3132 The Baxter Meadows Neighborhood Center designed as a community node is intended to have the majority of the landscaping in the public areas; street rights-of-way, parks and Association- owned parking lots. The street landscaping will consist of boulevard trees and landscaped bulb- outs and pedestrian crossings. The Neighborhood Center parks and the Linear Park have been designed for both active and passive recreational uses. The parking lots have been designed to meet the mandatory parking lot provisions. All the landscaping will be maintained by the Neighborhood Center Business Owner Association assuring single responsibility, continuity and design character. Section 18.54.100 Open Space • Subdivision PUD Open Space Requirements fromLanette Windemaker Options for Park Dedication Requirements ♦ Parks ♦ Centers, predominately Open Space 4 Trail Corridors, minimum 25' wide Not Acceptable for Park Dedication Requirements ♦ Watercourse Setback ♦ Stormwater Retention Facilities ♦ Non-Residential Yard Setbacks ♦ Residential Yard Setbacks ♦ Parking Lot Interior Landscaping ♦ Anythin in Public Right-of-Way Land Under Enclosed Space • 5 i • • Baxter Meadows Subdivision PUD Open Space Summary (11%) Phase Overall Size Net Acres Required Provided Percentage Phase I 66.5 ac 53.0 ac 5.7 ac 17.0 ac 32.7% Phase Ila 30.3 ac 22.3 ac 2.5 ac 2.6 ac 11.8% Phase Ilb 26.4 ac 17.4 ac 1.9 ac 5.4 ac 31.0% Phase Ilc 19.0 ac 12.6 ac 1.4 ac 0.3 ac 29.0% Phase 111 35.1 ac 22.0 ac 24.0 ac 0.5 ac 2.4% Phase IV 74.7 ac 57.9 ac 6.4 ac 21.5 ac 37.1% Phase V 37.8 ac 36.0 ac 3.9 ac 4.0 ac 11.0% Phase VI 51.2 ac 39.5 ac 4.3 ac 16.7 ac 42.30/co 341.0 ac 260.7 ac 28.5 ac 68.0 ac 26.1 • 6 BAXTER MEADOWS— PHASE 2A, 2B and 2C Park and Open Space Requirements Zoning and Subdivision P.U.D. Requirements Phase Ila Zoning Subdivision Gross Area: 664,443 sf/15.3 acres 664,443 sf/15.3 acres Net Area (less R.O.W.) 317,642 sf/7.3 acres 317,642 sf/7.3 acres Park Requirements: 95,293 sf/2.2 acres 34,941 sf/.8 acres (30% net) 11% net) Park/Open Space Provided: 76,182 sf/1.8 acres 44,812 sf/1.1 acres Linear Park (Public) 59,122 sf/1.75 acres 59,122 sf Stormwater Retention (Public) - (14,400 sf Watercourse Setback (Public) 17,060 sf - Tract 1 Gross Area: /20 acres /20 acres Phase Ilb Zoning Subdivision Gross Area: 1,151,393 sf/26.4 acres 1,151,393 sf/26.4 acres Net Area (less R.O.W.) 759,919 sf/17.4 acres 759,919 sf/17.4 acres Park Requirements: 227,976 sf/5.2 acres 83,591 sf/1.9 acres (30% net) (11% net) Park/Open Space Provided: 275,676 sf/6.3 acres 249,126 sf/5.7 acres Village Green.(Private) 94,266 sf 94,266 sf NC Park, Lot 7, Block 17 (Private) 11,467 sf 11,467 sf Stormwater Retention - (1,685 sf) NC Park, Lot 2, Block 15 (Private) 11,467 sf 11,467 sf Linear Park (Public) 133,661 sf 133,661 sf Watercourse Setback (Public) 24,815 sf - BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE Ilc Zoning Subdivision Gross Area: 827,075 sf/19.0 acres 827,075 sf/19.0 acres -Net Area (less R.O.W.) 550,355 sf/12.6 acres 550,355 sf/12.6 acres Park Requirements: 165,107 sf/3.8 acres 60,539 sf/1.4 acres (30% net) (11% net) Park/Open Space Provided: 29,365 sf/.67 acres 12,305 sf/.28 acres Pocket Park (Public) 10,055 sf 10,055 sf Trail Corridor(Private) 2,250 sf 2,250 sf Watercourse Setback 17,060 sf - (Public) • • BAXTER MEADOWS -OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Zoning Open Space (30%) Subdivision Open Space (11%) Overall Size Net Acres Required Provided % Required Provided % Baxter Meadows 341.0 ac. 260.7 ac. 78 ac. 84.1 ac 32.30% 28.5 ac 68.0 ac 26.10% snow, 110' Phase 1 66.5 ac. 53.0 ac. 15.6 ac. 17.0 ac. 32.70% 5.7 ac. 17.0 ac. 32.70% Phase II a 15.3 ac. 7.3 ac. 2.2 ac. 1.7 ac. 23.90% 0.8 ac. 1.0 ac. 13.70% Tract la & lb 20 ac. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Phase II b 19.0 ac. 12.6 ac. 3.8 ac. 0.67 ac. 5.31% 1.4 ac. 0.3 ac. 2.90% Phase II c 26.4 ac. 17.4 ac. 5.2 ac. 6.3 ac. 36.20% 1.9 ac. 5.7 ac. 32.76% Phase III 35.1 ac. 22.0 ac. 6.6 ac. .52 ac. 2.40% 2.4 ac. 0.5 ac. 2.40% Phase IV 74.7 ac. 57.9 ac. 17.4 ac. 24.2 ac. 41.80% 6.4 ac. 21.5 ac. 37.10% Phase V 52.8 ac. 51.0 ac. 15.3 ac. 15.3 ac. 30.00%1 5.6 ac. 5.6 ac. 11.00% Phase VI 51.2 ac. 39.5 ac. 11.9 ac. 18.4 ac. 46.60%1 4.3 ac. 16.7 ac. 42.30% 4���-�.. _I�i�lllt!�ilWIN L� ��i\� .- ��iY r ♦ .571 �I� �Z cg I , i .- :.III ,��t��l-y I�il�\Ile�f'.1�� .< I c0• .. mrt m" \ ��( • .,'`�,�~•-- �_ � _ -- - _ -J, ,`-.:.::---, , . --,-�� � •n ��`, i �., �, i. i illlla:�llll,`•- ���,`al�a�- �-� 11'''' pp��gigi��gg SSyy �.> !I IIJ 11, 111� I a�,. ��.-�• '1 plpl- �pp� 7��� , _ a�.fi�� - �IIFII�WY�QI3CIt1_� .'�t —F�' � "� .p• '�/I:��IIII 'I�I"rII�LII11111:��tlLLIII:�tdf�r, � �. _ �tr_w•2 �• y -�" - - -i: — •u���i�f��a:= — �..�w.wnlue�'��. 4�-�,Ei�,^''�_�L'��•' ��. "'`il:Ii,�. II����I� (,�\ Ci��Illllll�� ._ �..� ��,,jj --�;� ' � / • � • / � UIYIYIAIYItl) a',� n �, ai � � d� r _ ••¢ i\._�`�' I i �'�.i � nellf�rlatrinn.: .� _3jiinii� —==�-.1f�aC :� --- _ ,�'?.��: �_ - _ _a '� €i��l��•= �= _ � ♦\\��:. � _■IYIG �1�11111 C �711BIIr�'�- \ ,7 • 'C\� ��- _ ""C..' _ •�a � i = \ _:� �� - 5e MI \ -�:; ' .� a 111.r..•...'i. - =���Jll•= _7 e:: o li.�f'"' .a,. y +;. .. -1�\� � 1 1,,= •7"ie. \ \�ii= I�Ilir! I — .\�� -5t1,Il,—_ � - .— ---�— — �s► �:�,�..•I� If :,II'' ��� �3•�Iri.f�� -�-v"s', ® ®I�� I,®I„Ii= % •'�\,''`vim:��l_ ..—....' I�I�� ` ! 1:= :IR' .;--- �, • �� �� � .,, _II�.�; .1 I�: .,,�,����,�< �-- —�.• i gl ll.fl� l I= i ^b --n. r 6' • Il .I I li c� - - w „.r.r r;.r,..,,c �Ilil.11llll.11llllllllllll�l ® - �� ���• � - - _,_ -�" ��., ,:..r,., .,,I, __ _�.��• �.cr-_.dui ..Q ,:���5���'�7�......_�..>..._.,___ .... I[/�111�!IE�t������{s.• %�-3�U`._ Q�_ �— °.�'S `fl /P ✓ _-:'ii' il�nPi�l Fh e, €Illlllhlll ` ® � - �. �;1111 �;� _� - �. —� .� /P � -° ::• jo-�; - - �• Omni— �_. -i1111P =Lllilll! �. .>, — 1 •t— ';a%' �\ Via:'' �' .'e. — >..ar•r C 1>' v•� 1��11_ I: Eli■I � �. 1 — ,�-, I l. i y 1�iG �� �:�;s, ICI I I,til —H I•III��_�_ - ��` ,.r�lJ � LIIIUIIII���l,llllll�r•,�- ,a - ��-- ��I(li 111111111� I —.——'—:— { a.,�. '�4� ,•� T� - � I_ ili �r� • _ III— �'�.,__ — �11ni11>7IlIIIItII�IIIPllllf4�l.I:_ I I - :. a- , r E,r,® a I�ram,>�• Swlt � \ c����♦a .\;®; I• �i�ll��ail® \ \•���.,. � I ! •.I , \'\\, � ♦ �♦ �,`� .\\ .� _� �'� e;\ y1r ■■ �, 111111111411111 ��i_ 1n• \.�Lri\'�\� I '1119� SA ���'� ���I'��I�I�.'s \�,■� \I �!�I �I��I�;�I�I \1\r, �i�!♦ 6 I I I� �I I I I�I�4011 ! �I, MUM rae��Htrrersl IJ'neteers+m©r®� I l.S�lr!eirfoi�l IIAIB�Al7inu�e, Ate'�,/ .� �itSllitlllPBI3 a � \ I�� ■a01611151Y16 \ \\�\�\\, / t31l�(tflllucals 1' _ lall� e• c ' 1[oil�Sb4Efd�l� r• _ � 4l.elilWS9:� �@@�. �� err` �•%� �i"/a! § d 1 IN� SI S �� �, C �:r � . �♦\•.♦\\\,y'� .,,:' ii'sl��iE3�I�1� i:6." \r.•�. .. \ 1 l�i�i�S1!�)i0r1 I 0 s \.ilrlibb�,\,Z�°�:\�a\\'v'i � 1 ® WNW Itia �(1 ltl ;�1! I !�j?I�51i15!8511�i.�:•;? t!9 EAII v_ r� —I NJLa YIlS7♦fBli11®ICrl6b7tli l71/ :� g�plil71i661�a15 \ \�� \\\• r� ♦. ga Sirll ll`08tii$Fail '\` �\-- r / � ® � r5iiili�lY�(i i IIR *�•ll \\\�• I !i• I!]!1now �� �� r 9t�. i\,\ --��ftt ��� • �`. r'� ', Rim 9d11�9 ® i'iilllJ!a: ® [1i��� �. 1 \\"• I 9tlt �. i lllli'Ar tl��_li(tl�. �..,�9 �,� oil ®I j -�. '- � ., S IR�I�I •� �•\,® \a\C I �I 9BiJf�i 7�.�:I -_ - -� >P�;ta�ttu'6!'�`n�j :�>,, �\.?it:� ltitl�'�t'J. f �� !iTa;21e."vl'7? L r _ _! 3�e.11 ,s' isyS:tL'::;7l1:;;�IQ\� :�!"• �"�:.�: 'jam • �� �e1e ]11f:e,;.,,�--.;_ ,� i �.; �.®��n'I�upEt• _._. -�;,� �,.►;Li'. �!�1'-='s �J 1. �. ,vlt��1�1�At+',Ht:�rr:'•...a. � " ' -- .! \,9 :\v t � � �gle�..� S• n,4� '°� i 1 � � - �. ,+ ` �' 1�� 1 -w- �!�' ''�'y il.u�.. p V'.�ia ¢..epkSl��.'•'��'���b`4_1L''`6'{:1' 1:31r.4:?';.��...Fib'=��+s-�.t�;�':►'Sit%1 Y y .,,, !L' . c tne, as)LbSr!��!K. ;a19�ltilill7ll�fl6�� g ' ��i`�••� _ ::�rs., .��rr�v :ilHlC2�wl1!!ilo"_- _:� si ®.`...'tl!S�'J.Srr97lc '�:?:�:��. �t\�' ski � RP�•'�erif>43� .[.��`� �1S•ar .� ` p �• r \ 9 V'dAIli%.A'wlx ei� � ,��e-^--^--••• --- .�,,.�Y .� - •.\• � \;��• �I�I����\I\ �� �1�'�,. .fit WAIF I — — in I1�fili ilia \�\'��,_���;�\;\ I—•� I I �®\\�'\♦\e��; o �" � �' ,� 1 \ _ \ \Hit y1"m of Of l' I 1111 t®lm Neil 1:O.D11111 !l11111� IR'i' 1�1�l�Iieilitl ., i.i111t1 �_ E11111i1111!)It9 ! l.,tal®Illsf!l.rk!!a ,,\MN��7��c' alnil=��■ —� i(1i�1l9 -_ �__ I siti1! Ii!®IiB"slil1iAl� iH��.��tie.:r,mm:�\♦,♦�'.♦v.��'.,' ♦♦`• 6\ \,. 4t111111 dD rlli ��lit'i't�311 \\\\;i ya Ewa,. ta• �sj ���►�_ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\,: 1517I111 file•:�.\\\\\\`����,\\�'��\\\�\'\\\\\,\; �\\� , ,\\�a\\•\4t1]talilll�ltli IltaawinlrUl \\\\��rd v \ \, ® ♦� ,,,o - �-<\a `� \ 1\.,..\.• illli-1111/11T1 _ 1h1�1111I111'n11.. \\\� t►'/�7 4 �l �I a.a" l�ie�IJftiS'd6il�iJ!! ilRiUli]!IM \�•�i _E!@1���� �•e � ��,-. ti �j irr�:r■� a\�ra arl!!tll IAI :�a d ; ��i tit �! lilftl®ltit>!!HI _ _ 1 �1'lurrt5aalalt — ! ftailAl!I I 1111111i CFO z1g, \ ®i � � !� •3 � I�I _ !�1\11���:. St;R'Alt9..0aii \\\\�?Ifil Is>;!llrtr�L�ImOt.�: ♦♦b/t1fiR�'It',N13,111I1 e:_..,o•.,+' I A/7leigil�'r" >• a�tll'�1 'r71;, t??313°61� , �'•�I ' Y�{.1�.. �/'�R •e �n .. -I@-1-:. . �; �'� 9 ® ri e_ a ass_. ,, • �+t<ett�s�,�:�•�► ;Zt Q. 'E! `•'9 I �®�1.1•I't 1 ��.� I Ilt`!'riilrFtlP .:!7-a iEe 1�:•L7F "� \al1 -Mr% �� I'.�' ` � � �� 9ria7E I'�i d' 3�ldlE� pp���,J/[ ��qq��������,, _ -,�,��e., `��I�r`'�r i I I -tg 1�5i�i7�SSJi7P818i7�;►.'llll°iP jiP.'IS� ���si'S1Et�.�:i°k:'35%eii`\\\� _ E` ".�7'!�1Z�vaffi'+T.t���I.�eT '�'� a.� a� � '��iV•(ICtcN'.�oT�.�i�. � - _ (�3 r,l�f b��rj �p�;ir: sv>�c.r'`R� 7_ • • •� �� � , `_! I i�J.. �a� w�..-t..:�� � ��� +. = .aa � �71::, I�' � _ __-i _- - _ _ will air — Rlt .Gyp pl vFF'� �rl !?=JillR� 51d1 • Y ���'`' �I•�/.�\/I h�i�,�s li�l Wry ��/� 4 Inc i ��Y� - - - • • - M iul cirl r . -. _�_...............,....... -.....,..... _ - _ = .....__.._.. - - - (; — firers +"'': .='s :, .I 1•\_ - - mmm �� +r - • �I�Io°� - - • �ai\ r !A/` !• v - ` , SI ■��1"'�� 11�'. s� � 1%�� Q :1� �� ���% �% '�� I i' -- 'Y'1 L,.;..� °�S _ al ::r::::;iG�::::•.�'::::'::::n:.:::...:::...... �ii II _ _ ,=�iM; ■? i> IIk y�Fk Y dd ��i►��'t ■ .11 �111. I�lf�I�nlh ���-' �lI ��7i1 IIo 15 .����i,.�J..I� 1///�-,���' �I�'-�/�� ���1 �i� i�i �MI��; ��� ��! � _f.�_.F 1:3:�� �ae••f 1'��ti 1 i�- - e�� O •.• In u1■��t� :��J �.fiT � i _ ��� ■�i►;g �� i;l��1`� �!��! I� r :'�h� ,�■. r. _ �0�� ��r 1;Ik +� b i t�� I"E� T.�6 ,, ►-- � l�l�■n' '" n�� �,► �.: ,,,�m IQ'r ���jc I•;s .�:. .ail alit lie r� �:—�►.� _ �� ll''' _i� -- :1ii , t� ++; ������ ■; 71 N I- q in - �. I I�'� r�� ►� sill i�... � .u �, �I�-'��n�l� ,� °�111 ���I��I■11��1 r 11:) � sss•.;� .\9:. :,.;�°����,o .� ��....; + . ..r � � O � S..,." lt.. .. 1 �I .. •__is • I • •� . . I I:,y • � •- _ - EMI' lei 9E' i i�o is e3 .r-�:I:sls:srnrns�nm "-� .. ,.� •l 1.� '�.a.� C,•: o;'r °F-> is • ♦i . . � f 7 � I � t:°� ..La.. _x.�J�t' •,pG�p:bxC: ::L::yi,I� �.: ( ..:.Y :'t � � ... (97e1 II -I:u � :I�` r lee ;al°� ��I '■ • �' am�eilk 1?h �il�b 1€D d01 ► • -• CII g—� _... -. .ale is..... ....._ O - _ �I�f rj �m� r �r IMF I PHA E II ef UND,4RY W '�NI KIMBERWICKE ST. _ a V m KIMBERWICKE ST_ - I W 5� . ! ! I I �\ LL I I� I �� L—_I_ W - L _ -A. i F--�I I I k\\7\\771FTT _I(�pCI I j G) --�CA Q • ow X� L u• Eli I '—� --------- ---------'---------- --- ---- ------ - m r---r--- .Q IL r-- -- ;I ' JUNCTION 7711 � yy BOX r__� I WHID STRE G I -- --- ` \!I B RA IDf�EETZ ------LLI W ------ - I I oos Efl xNN�Wptarflflc ! oM — ———— —— ui I Q -_ 1•�pq4,lItl�l _ W I ^--•--�- IIIl1CIiI�I1I l—II --------I '--J----III--------------- ---;I ---- wuw, ONpEs1MTHEIE�@O n_ENCwa awlweL J CTI ovW ---- Wr Z 01 ( ---� f/0 f!1Q —_—_—— 15'EASEMENT 0 Eo'Y�a mflNEPrP�.P�9 E05F6®E�IRNE�.o Ox w I W II IN 7 l I I I' II -------�--- Q _ - LF777 w ,IAN LANE i ITF 11 �- 12'�AW411 W ! ! 11 ! III III I I I I E ! ! ! III i3'!£ASEMENT ! ! ! I ! coV, r -- -- - — - 6 Zp]£a. Q ®zIONJUN [ON GV Q I p III P"" Box — w �0 _1 III I Q y w LEGEND �`u! III " cc N - --+ -- _ L, SYMBOL LOCATION TOTAL TYPE CATALOG - ARM HEADS HEIGHT CONFIG. & � _ III I1 I I B TRAKKE I RAIL ><co W m E LAMP FIXT. LENSE ARM POLE/WT. FM. ; I _ _ -- -� MQM�,i0 X A BAXTER LANE 5 PI IT5-MH- SW-SG3-V-OMIA-SM&P-2m-BKTX 2' I 20' STAGGERED ! I B = W m W FERGUSON RD. Ec�UESTRIAN WAY RAWHIDE BT., I , ! ! B TRAKKER TRAIL BAT£R PARKWAY, 35 PI Imm-MH-DM85m-SG3-V-OMIA-SM6F-18-BKTX 2' 1 Its' STAGGEMD I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! C GHAROLAIS AVER.,GASPIAN AVE. BOX 69C LASSO AVE.,MILKHSEAVE.,GALLATINGREENELVD. Im PI 7m-MFI-DM-AW-SGI-V-OMIA-SMbP-IS-BKTX 2' 1 IT.5' STAGGERED �7ET• OU %I III I -ALLEY 17 - -- II! - - ("-T-- --- PROJECT NO. 020L8 JUNc�ION I I DRAWN BY: GRE I , II CHECKED BY: JK SYMBOL UTILITY !B E ! ! ! ! III ! ! ,;I ! ! r ! IJ ! ! I ! ! -- GA8 AND POWER LINE - l III IIBIR'2C0 OPTIC I _ �' II DATES —'-- FIBERCOMMUNIGATIONB _ --- -- - - -- -- - - -- ------ - ----------------------- -- - Lc- --- - - - - - - '- -- -- '- - PRE: - A AIII BAXTER LANE -AI; A CRS: 10)29/03 ----------- --- ----- --- -- --- — --— --- __ —_ Z�mw ------- � --------- REV: tTZD I 7- SHEET: UTILITY AND STREET LIGHT SITE FLAN 3C 4 STREET TREES `\ SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE I ACER RUBRUM WORTHWOOP' NORTHWOOP RED MAPLE 1.5" jPHASE I f UN i1' I I Q CELTIC OCCIDENTALIS HACKBERRY 1.5" FRAXNUS NIGRA'FALLGOLD' FALLGOLD BLACK ASH 1.5" EQUESTRIAN BRIDCzE — — — �� Q FRAXINUS PENNSYI-VANICA PATHMORE GREEN ASH 2" JNI OYER STREAM I � GLEDI'PATHK ORE' W '•' Q ® , I �� !_�:i',`.,• GL£DIT81A TRJACANtHOS IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST 2" I � � o � I � ° o' SORISUB AUCUPARIA'DEGORA' SNOWY MOUNTAIN ASH 2" QOV I° ACTIVE O ULMUS AMERICANA AMERICAN ELM 2" /r �} I RECREATION \` W 50 ( o FI (TODDLES AY)— — — ° I O COMMON OPEN AREA TREES O T >,. I SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE m + 3 "C! Q FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA PATHMORE GREEN ASH 2" Q m ° I 'PATHMORE' J /R • V ® POPULUS IREMULOIDEB QUAKING ASPEN 1.5" 8 o o I J Q (1 rr "i IANA CANADA RED'CANADA RED' I" v J • CHOKECHERRY X FL- p SYRINCIA RETICULATA JAPANESE TREE LILAC Lb." O W Q n i °• 1° �y�� m O I— — — — Cc PICEA PUNGENS'GLAUCA' COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 5-9" 1 0 COMIUS SERICEA'ISANTI' I$ANtI DOGWOOD 5 GAL • ' — .— — — — .. SPIRAEA X BUMALDA FROEBEL SPIREA 5 GAL U ° BELIP EQUESTRIAN •ti `( JUNIPER 14ORIZONTALIS BLUE CHIP JUNIPER 5 GAL ITRAIL 'BLUE CHIP' It r�ll� ® PNU5 SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE b-lm"77 QQ•O' Q• /" ® /�`� o I LANDSCAPE BOULDER 0 lb o � �° 1 4 v IA 2 IT 2 N MID TIE DEAN THEY R@R6'FM,ME TIE Ip• So 1AIF NOD�� , TEREDRun F�D RE�4/�4CTIYE L�NpSC�:PE FLAN R�RTSEPRNE� COMMON OPEN 4DN 'sOH 1 CDNSENf OF W M11VE D6kN"R'�" ACTIVE Y' ° RECREATION (SAND VOLLEYBALL) , II I a. I W w Q ° Q lo (L z CD Z IQ p� ly I I p w �l iz I '� �° I I W�� Z I PEDESTRIAN I I I I O a w TRAIL ------ — — --- I p I it co Z I 1£ wmc ` O ----- ---- - - -- I x w m m o0 N = .5 WO ollidl:ro`N�Q I I I I ° IIL SET: PROJECT N0, rD2m1.8 DRAWN BY: CRE JK �JJ CHECKED BY: JK DATES I � I 'I I PRE: - CRS: I0/25/03 ` CDS: / \ I v 10 I D REV: - i SHEET: COMMON OPEN AREA L�4NpSC,4PE PL,4N � COMMON OPEN ,4REA LANDSC,4PE PLAN COMMON OPEN �4REA I"• 501-011 4 © III_ 20-4)" © D ,11�_,ml—V d 3B-2 EXHIBIT 3D BAXTER MEADOWS—PHASE II October 2003 STREET CROSS SECTIONS See Sheet C5-20 Typical Roadway Sections Robert Peccia &Associates Submittal AV_ EXHIBIT 3E BAXTER MEADOWS— PHASE II October 2003 . PHYSIOGRAPHIC DATA The following documents were submitted with Baxter Meadows Phase I for the Baxter Meadows Master Plan. The reports encompass the total 440-acre property. ♦ Environmental Assessment and Flood Hazard Evaluation ♦ Wetland Delineation ♦ NRCS Soils Information ♦ Ground Water Monitoring Data ♦ Vegetation Map ♦ Weed Control Plan • • • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, COMMUNITY IMPACT REPORT AND FLOOD HAZARD EVALUATION FOR BAXTER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PREPARED BY WETLANDS WEST ROBERT PECCIA & ASSOCIATES MITHUN INC. WIIIJAMS BROTHERS INC. OCTOBER 17, 2001 1 CONTENTS • ITEM PAGE NO. lA GENERAL COMMMENTS 3 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3 3.0 COMMUNITY IMPACT REPORT 16 4.0 FLOOD HAZARD EVALUATION 21 • • Z ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, COMMUNITY IMPACT REPORT AND • FLOOD HAZARD EVALUATION 1.0 GENERAL This Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Report generally follows the outline provided in Chapter 16.18 of the City of Bozeman,Montana Interim Subdivision Regulations 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2.1 SURFACE WATER 2.1.1 Description of Waterways The property lies at an elevation of approximately 4,700 feet, encompassing 434 acres that slope gradually from south to north as is characteristic of the Gallatin Valley. The historic and current land use is agricultural, primarily'livestock grazing and hay and crop production. The property has been leased by a dairy operation for approximately 50 years. Five surface waterways traverse the property, flowing in a south to north direction. The waterways from east to west, are the Section-line ditch, the Spring Ditch, an unnamed drainage ditch, an unnamed tributary to the Baxter-Border ditch, and the Baxter-Border ditch. Waterways in the greater Bozeman area have been mapped and • classified as streams, stream/ditch combinations, or ditches by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP) on the 1993 "Streams and Ditches" map. Stream/ditches are typically naturally occurring streams that have been historically channelized for irrigation purposes. Ditches convey water only during the irrigation season and are dry otherwise. According to the FWP system, the Baxter-Border ditch, Spring Ditch, and unnamed tributary of the Baxter-Border are classified as stream/ditches. The Section-line ditch is classified as a ditch and the unnamed drainage ditch is not classified. Waterways within the subject property are discussed below with FWP designations shown in parentheses. The "NJ" designation stands for"non- jurisdictional", which means that the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) has waived their jurisdictional authority over the waterway under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Non jurisdictional determinations were made during an onsite visit by an agent from the Helena Regulatory Branch as referenced in the letter included as Exhibit A. A sixth waterway is noted on the FWP map for the property, the Maynard-Border ditch. However, this waterway does not surface within the property boundaries. The water from the ditch is piped through the west half of the SW 1/a of Section 34. Descriptions of each project waterway follow. • The Section-Line ditch (Ditch/NJ): The ditch borders the east property boundary in Sections 3 and 34, flowing north along Davis Road and the • section lines. It is classified as a ditch by the FWP and non-jurisdictional by the COE. 3 • The Spring Ditch (Stream/ditch). The original source of this waterway was apparently a natural spring located at the south property boundary. Currently • the water is collected underground (presumably via a french drain system) and discharged to a pipe placed in the bottom of the man-made channel. The channel flows north from the southeast section of the property, crosses Baxter . Lane, then flows into a wetland (W-1)located on the north property boundary. • Unnamed Drainage Ditch (Unclassified/NJ). This ditch is located in Section 3, lying between.the Spring Ditch and Baxter-Border ditch tributary. The drainage ditch surrounds and drains high groundwater from an agricultural field that is a prior converted (PC) wetland. The PC designation was determined by an onsite investigation completed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service)in.1989 in accordance with the USDA Food Security Act(FSA)regulations. The drainage ditch has been designated as artificial and non jurisdictional by the COE. The ditch currently conveys water from the Farmer's Canal to the Spring Ditch from a point of diversion (POD)near the south end of the property. Current plans propose to move the POD to Baxter Lane where the water would be conveyed through a pipe along the north side of Baxter Lane to the Spring Ditch. The downstream water rights owner has been contacted and is amenable. Relevant Department of Natural Resource and Conservation (DNRC)permits will be completed by the applicant. • The Baxter-Border ditch (Stream/ditch). The Baxter-Border ditch • technically begins on Baxter Lane. However, for ease of reference, this discussion includes the connecting stream/ditch south of Baxter Lane (Figure 2.1). This unnamed waterway flows north to Baxter Lane, then west along Baxter Lane for approximately 1,200 feet. At this point, it converges with the Baxter-Border ditch. Water from an unnamed ditch that flows adjacent to Flanders Mill Road south of the project also discharges to the Baxter-Border ditch. The Baxter Border ditch flows north from Baxter Lane through Section 34 until it exits the north property boundary. • Maynard-Border Ditch (Buried pipe). Water from the Maynard-Border Ditch is piped underground once it crosses Durston Road. The pipe enters the subject property at Baxter Lane and runs north-northwest through the SW '/4 of Section 34, exiting the property along Harper-Puckett Road. 2.1.2 Wetlands A wetland delineation was completed in May 2000 for Williams Brothers Construction by Wetlands West, Inc. using the 1987 Routine Determination Method developed by the COE. The complete wetland report, including data sheets and functional assessment forms, is included as Appendix A. Three wetland types encompassing 26.2 acres were identified on the property: depressional, riverine, and artificial. Delineated wetlands are briefly discussed below by type and are shown in the attached wetland map submittal. • 4 • • Depressional Wetlands (W-4, W-5,W-7, W-8,W-10,W-11): Depressional wetlands occur in low topographic features. Dominant water sources are .precipitation, groundwater discharge, and overland flow from adjacent uplands (Brinson et al. 1995). Depressional wetlands comprise the largest group of wetlands.within the property, totaling of 17 acres or 3.7% of the total acreage. Wetland 8 is the largest depressional wetland (11 acres), which is relatively undisturbed and includes ponded water throughout most of the . wetland. In general, the other depressional wetlands lack standing water or saturated soil conditions. The exception is the historical channel of the unnamed stream/ditch tributary,W-5, which appears to be saturated for longer periods of the year based on the proliferation of the wetland species,beaked sedge (C. utriculata). Other species noted within depressional wetlands include: Baltic rush (Juncus balticus), meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis), fescue (Festuca spp), orchard grass (Dactylylis glomerata),beaked sedge (Carex utriculata), and timothy(Phleum pratense). • Riverine Wetlands (W-1, W-3): Riverine wetlands are areas within the banks of a stream or river channel, including overflow and abandoned channels, and sloughs (MNHP 1999). In general, the hydrology within riverine channels is supported by in-stream flows, although water may or may not always flow (Cowardin et al. 1979). Riverine wetlands comprise the second largest wetland type within the project site encompassing 7.5 acres or • 1.6% of the total wetland acreage. The Baxter-Border(W-3) and Spring (W- 1) ditches (stream/ditches)carry groundwater throughout the year. These ditches were likely natural streams that were channelized to accommodate agricultural practices. Vegetation along the stream/ditches at the time of the delineation was sparse as a result of grazing. The sample point(SP) was established within the Spring Ditch (W-1)in Section 3, where patches of wild celery (Vallisneria americana) were observed. A limited number of cottonwoods (Populus spp.) grow along the banks. Isolated patches of beaked sedge (Carex utriculata) are found on the Baxter-Border ditch within the low- lying areas. The relatively low areal extent of riverine wetlands contrasts with the high number of surface water bodies (5)reflecting the narrow, straight configuration of these degraded waterways. • Artificial wetlands(W-2,6)encompass 1.7 acres on the property. The NRCS defines artificial wetlands as those that result from human activity, such as irrigation structures, ditches, and artificial waterways. Localized hydrology can be sufficient to allow the development of wetland characteristics. The Section- Line ditch (W-2) and drainage ditch (W-6) are considered artificial wetlands The Helena Regulatory office has waived jurisdiction over these waterways (Exhibit A). It should be noted that final discretionary authority over all • wetland impacts, whether to natural or artificial wetlands, lies with the US COE under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 5 Functional Assessments. Functions of wetlands exist in the absence of man and • are normally part of a self-sustaining ecosystem. Functions are the observable and measurable, inherent characteristics of aquatic ecosystems that maintain or have an influence upon the system itself. The functional value of wetlands address several criteria including groundwater recharge and discharge; sediment trapping; nutrient retention and removal; food chain support; wildlife and fish habitat; and heritage values including recreation. The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)Montana Wetland Assessment Method (MDT, 1999) was used to assess the functional ability of the project's wetlands. The evaluation provides a numerical wetland category based on the above criteria. The categories range from I through IV, from the highest functional values to the lowest values. Functional assessments provide baseline and comparative data on the values of wetlands prior to any future activity in the event the COE requires mitigation for any wetland impacts or the landowner voluntarily mitigates or enhances project wetlands. All of the wetland groups were ranked as Category III wetlands; however,there is considerable variability within the Category III rating. The grouped depressional wetlands (W-4, W-5,W-7,W-10, W-11)were ranked very low in Category III (31%) as a result of low ratings in wildlife habitat,uniqueness, and recreation potential. Collectively, the riverine type wetlands (W-1,W-3) scored 43% in functional points due . • to a low rating in general wildlife habitat, sediment/nutrient/toxicant removal, uniqueness, and recreation potential. Although W-8 scored low in wildlife habitat value, it ranked highly in Category III(56%) as a result of high scores in several categories including water storage and production export/food chain support.. The complete functional assessment forms are presented with the wetland delineation report in Appendix A. 2.1.3 Water Body Alteration Joint 310/404 permits will be submitted to the Gallatin County Conservation District (310) and the COE (404) for any stream crossings, enhancements or alterations, and/or impacts to wetlands. Impacts to wetlands will be avoided and minimized to the extent practicable. The largest and higher quality wetland (W-8) in the northeast corner of the property will be either enhanced or preserved in its current location. The area surrounding the wetland will be protected. Current design plans propose to enhance in place the Baxter-Border stream/ditch north of Baxter Lane. The segment south of Baxter Lane (W-5; unnamed tributary) will be enhanced/restored, which may require minimal realignment of the channel. The objective will be to restore the entire stream/ditch to a more natural configuration by increasing the sinuosity (meanders), re-grading the banks, improving fish habitat through the excavation of pool and riffle complexes, and creating wetland/riparian floodplains. Preliminary design plans also address the enhancement/restoration of the Spring • Ditch. The stream/ditch may be realigned to form a focal point for a proposed trail/open 6 • space corridor. Proposed design plans allow for a 100-foot stream corridor with setbacks. This effectively triples the existing Spring Ditch corridor, creating a floodplain where none currently exists. Flow into the stream/ditch may be augmented by over-excavating the new channel to a lower grade and by collecting groundwater from the proposed Conservation Area Lake that will be constructed west of the Spring Ditch. The Baxter-Border and Spring Ditches may receive stormwater runoff from the subdivision. The runoff will be passively treated in detention ponds to reduce sediment loads and flow velocities. Stormwater will be released from the site at a rate less than or equal to the peak pre-development flow for a 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Current designs also include the construction of three ponds for aesthetics and recreation. The Conservation Area Lake would be an integral part of an active use park located in the southwest area of the development on approximately 17 acres. Water for the approximately 6-acre lake would be provided by groundwater. Residential lots in the northwest corner of the development will surround an equestrian complex and recreational fisheries lake encompassing approximately 2.5 acres. A third pond is planned for aesthetics and fisheries within the Technological Park. Department of Natural Resource and Conservation Beneficial Water Use permits (600) will be obtained where applicable. 2.2 GROUNDWATER • 2.2.1 Depth: Water-bearing materials in the area are predominantly quaternary and tertiary alluvial fan deposits. Groundwater flows in a north-northwest direction, roughly paralleling the slope of the ground surface (USGS 1.995). Eighteen (18) monitoring wells were installed at the site in May and June of 2000 to measure groundwater levels for design and construction purposes. Three nested piezometers were subsequently installed in September to more accurately characterize groundwater depths in the general location of the proposed ponds. Monitoring well and piezometer locations are shown on the map included in Appendix B. Static water levels were measured once in May/June and again in August. Beginning in September 2000, groundwater levels have been, and will continue to be, measured every two to three weeks until July 2001. The monitoring frequency may be reduced from December through March once the levels stabilize. Static water level readings measured from May through November are also included in Appendix B. The highest groundwater level was measured at 1.6 inches below ground surface (bgs) in MW-27 on October 17`h. This well is located in the south central portion of Section 3. Current data indicates that static water levels (SWLs) within the subdivision development range from less than one-foot bgs in the south portion of the property (Section 3) to 9.5 feet bgs in the north portion (Section 34). Water features for the development, such as the ponds, will be designed to take into account existing groundwater levels. • 7 Well logs from residential wells indicate well depths ranging from 40 to 72 feet and static • water levels from 6 to 14 feet. The lithologic logs identified a silt loam topsoil layer extending from 0 to 3 feet followed by alternating layers of sand and cobbles to 72 feet with intermittent narrow lenses of clay. Production rates measured in surrounding residential,fire protection,and irrigation wells ranged from 5 to 1000 gpm. 2.2.2 Steps to Avoid Degradation: The community water supply for the subdivision will be provided by connecting to the City of Bozeman water system. The water system will be designed by a Professional Engineer in accordance with requirements of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) Circular 3 and City of Bozeman Standards. Therefore,groundwater will not be utilized to supply the subdivision except for irrigation of selected open space areas. Sanitary wastewater will be collected using a standard gravity sewer collection system which will be connected to the City of Bozeman's Sanitary Sewer System: Treatment will occur at the City of Bozeman Wastewater Treatment Plant. There will be no discharge of sanitary wastewater to the groundwater aquifer. 2.3 GEOLOGY—SOILS-SLOPES 23.1 Geologic Hazards There are no known geologic hazards or areas of instability within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision site. The entire Gallatin Valley is classified as a Seismic Zone 3. Zone 0 has the least • earthquake potential,Zone 4 has the greatest potential. 23.2 Protective Measures All new utilities will be buried,reducing the risk of property damage or personal injury in the event of an earthquake. Buildings will be designed to withstand Seismic Zone 3 earthquake loadings,in accordance with applicable regulations. 23.3 Unusual Features No significant or unusual geologic features are evident on the property. The landform is an alluvial deposit typical of the north side of Bozeman, featuring deep soils and variable depths to sand and gravels. Slopes range from 0% to 4% (NRCS 2000). The property does exhibit high groundwater levels and isolated layers of impermeable clay. Engineering measures that will be taken to overcome potential limitations are discussed in the Groundwater and Soils sections (Section 2.2 and Section 2.3.4). 2.3.4 Soils Soil characteristics and a Gallatin County Soil Survey map of the site were obtained from NRCS . Ten map units were identified within the project area. Map units with hydric components and/or inclusions are: Threeriv-Bonebasin loams (MRCS soil type 556A), Blossberg loam (542A),Enbar loam (509B), and Meadowcreek loam • (510B). Non-hydric soils were identified as Amsterdam silt loam (53B), Blackdog silt 8 loam (50B), Amsterdam-Quagle silt loam(453C), Quagle-Brodyk silt loam (451C), Turner loam(457A), and Danvers-Quagle complex (458C). The Enbar,Threeriv,Bonebasin,Blossberg,Meadowcreek,Turner and Danvers soil types were identified as having severe limitations for septic system adsorption fields as a result of wetness, slow percolation,and/or poor filtering. The remaining soil types exhibited moderate limitations. Limitations for building site development were listed as severe for the Enbar,Bonebasin,Blossberg,Meadowcreek,Turner and Danvers soil types as a result of wetness,caving on cut slopes,flooding, and/or shrink/swell potential. These soil types also had severe limitations for local roads and streets as a result of the potential for frost action. Building site and road construction limitations on the remaining soils were rated as slight to moderate. 2.3.5 Design Methods to Overcome Limitations Geotechnical evaluations will be completed site-wide prior to roadway and building design to identify potential soil limitations. Building foundations and footings will be constructed to account for soil limitations and high groundwater conditions. Where necessary, topsoil layers containing clay will be over-excavated and replaced with structural fill. Typical cross-sections of the roadway will be designed to account for site- specific soil types. Site buildings and residences will not be constructed with basements in areas with high groundwater conditions. • 2.3.6 Cuts and Fills Due to the flat topography of the site, areas of excessive cuts and fills are not anticipated. If they become necessary appropriate erosion control measures and storm water runoff mitigation measures will be taken. 2.4 VEGETATION 2.4.1 Vegetation Map Major vegetation types are depicted on the vegetation map in the appendix. The acreages and type of crop and grazing land have been approximated (pers. commun. Tom Kingma). Major vegetation types There are four major vegetation categories within the Baxter Meadows property: cropland (historically barley, alfalfa hay, and mixed-grass species hay), grazing land (mixed grass species), emergent/shrub marsh (Carex spp.), and riparian stream corridors (Figure 2.2). Cultivated crops within the property include barley and alfalfa. Grazing lands are comprised of a variety of grass species, including fescue (Festuca spp.), orchard grass • (Dactylis glomerata), timothy (Phleum pratense), foxtail (Hordeum jubatum), and 9 bluegrass (Poa spp.). These species are excellent forage grasses, widespread in the Gallatin Valley where moisture is sufficient or supplemental irrigation is available. • Vegetation in the emergent/shrub marsh (W-8) located in the northeast corner of the property is comprised of Sitka alder, willow, Nebraska sedge, veronica(Veronica spp., OBL), and moss. The riparian stream corridors have been channelized for irrigation and heavily impacted by unrestricted cattle grazing. Although species diversity is low, the majority of species are native and include wild celery,beaked sedge, and a few black cottonwood trees. Broad-leafed cattail (Typha latifolia)inhabits the borrow ditches along Baxter Lane. Critical plant communities The Natural Heritage Program was contacted for information on species of concern in the vicinity of Section 3,T2S, R5E and Section 34,T1S,.R5E. A survey of the Program's databases identified reports for three plant species of concern. The reports are the result of a search for species of concern and communities that occur in the area defined by the legal description with an additional one-mile buffer surrounding the requested area. The complete report from the Natural Heritage Program is included in the Appendix. The first plant species of concern listed is dwarf purple monkeyflower(Mimulus nanus) observed last in 1894 in Section 34. The location accuracy for this siting is within a five-mile radius. The species is considered critically imperiled in Montana because of • extreme rarity. According to the Vascular Plants of West-Central Montana Identification Guidebook (USDA 1991), the dwarf monkeyflower has been found in the Montana region only on a dry gravelly slope above Sheephead Creek in the southern Bitterroot Mountains. These habitat conditions do not currently exist within the property boundaries. The project site consists of primarily level cultivated crop and pastureland with no areas of gravel exposed on the ground surface. The species was not observed during the onsite survey conducted as part of the wetland delineation. The second plant species identified is slender wedgegrass (Spenopholis intermedia), a state critically imperiled species last observed in 1926 in Section 2 of T2S, • 10 i • R5E. This short-lived perennial grass has been found in wet areas of valleys and • foothills, specifically the Gallatin River valley. This species has not been observed in this region in recent history. The last known observation occurred at a site greater than one-half mile outside the project boundaries. Its presence would not be expected on the project site. Small dropseed (Sporobolus neglectus)is an annual grass that is possibly imperiled but whose status is uncertain. It was last observed in this region in 1927 at the Montana State University (MSU)Bozeman Experiment Station Farm located in the SE'/a of Section 14,T2S, R5E. It is typically found in grasslands of the valleys and plains in both natural and disturbed habitats although it was likely planted in this region as part of the Station's widespread cultivation of native species. The MSU Experiment Station is located approximately two miles from the project. The presence of this species would not be expected within the property boundaries. Noxious Weeds Several species of thistle (Circium spp.) were observed during the wetland delineation. However, a complete noxious weed survey has not been conducted to date. A survey will be conducted during the spring of 2001 by a plant specialist. The survey results and recommendations for control will be summarized in a Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan that will be submitted to the Gallatin County Weed Control District for review. • Protective Measures. Several measures have been taken to ensure that open space is preserved. The stream corridors will be enhanced/restored to create a more natural and diverse vegetation community with a riparian floodplain consisting of emergents, shrubs, and trees. Approximately 72 acres will be preserved in either conservation areas, lakes, or park area. An additional 11 acres is slated for creation of a tree farm/nursery. Twenty acres of pastureland will be preserved as part of the equestrian center. As a result of agricultural practices, the few trees and shrubs that exist on the property are associated with wetlands and riparian corridors. The higher quality wetlands will not be impacted and all trees/shrubs, and unique wetland vegetation will be preserved or transplanted to restored/enhanced streams. The emergent/shrub marsh (W-8) will be preserved and/or enhanced for conservation purposes and wildlife use. The stream corridors that have been historically ditched and straightened will be enhanced as discussed in Sec. 2.1.3. • 11 2.5 WILDLIFE &FISHERIES • 2.5.1 Species As a result of the heavy agricultural use and openness of cropland,few signs of wildlife were observed within the project boundaries. Surrounding properties are frequented by white-tailed deer, skunk, muskrat, and raccoon. A red-tailed hawk was observed in the cottonwoods along the Spring Ditch and common snipe were seen in the emergent/shrub.marsh. Neotropical migrant bird species within the area include bobolinks, yellow warblers, song sparrows, and tree swallows. The diversity of birds is limited by the lack of tree and shrub species within the property. Fish species in area waterways are expected to include brown and brook trout, although an onsite�survey was not conducted. 2.5.2 Critical Areas The Natural Heritage Program was contacted for information on species of concern in the project vicinity. The Program's survey identified one animal species of concern in Section 31 of T1S and R6E at the MSU Experiment Station. The status of the stonefly (Isocapnia crinita) is considered imperiled in Montana because of rarity. No information was given on the date of the last observation or preferred habitat. The Experiment Station is located over two miles from the project area. The emergent/shrub marsh (W-8)provides the most diverse habitat within the • project boundaries, capable of supporting neotropical migratory birds, nonmigrant bird species (magpies, sparrows), and of providing protective cover for mammalian species. The excavation of shallow, open-water areas as part of enhancement activities will provide foraging and nesting grounds for waterfowl. Wildlife habitat and protection will be enhanced through the creation of open space areas consisting of conservation parks, trail systems, and lakes. The 100-foot riparian corridors will facilitate wildlife migration. Fisheries habitat will be enhanced with the creation of pool and riffle complexes and restoration of cover habitat via willow plantings on the stream corridors. The FWP will be consulted for their input on the stream enhancement and pond designs as part of the 310 permitting process (Section 2.1.3). 2.6 HISTORICAL FEATURES The State Historic Preservation Office has been contacted to determine if there are any historical or significant structures on the site or nearby that will be affected by the new subdivision. SHPO recommends that a cultural resources survey be completed prior to starting the project. See SHPO's letter in the Appendix. • 12 2.7 VISUAL IMPACTS The street layout and trails will follow existing contours as much as possible. Existing trees and natural elements such as wetlands and streams will be preserved. The landscape is conducive to the environment of the Bozeman area. Techniques being used include: ■ Gradual berming to reduce views from adjacent roads ■ Hydro seeding perimeter areas with native grasses and wildflowers to blend in with existing adjacent sites ■ Split rail fencing matching the flavor of the Bozeman country side ■ Introducing groves of aspen, mountain ash and evergreen species to buffer and blend with native groves of these species 2.8 SUMMARY OF PROBABLE IMPACTS 2.8.1 The Effect on Agriculture and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts Agricultural practices at the site include crop production, dairy farming, and cattle ranching. There are 341 acres of cropland and 141 acres of grazing land within the project area. The cropland is comprised of 193 acres of barley, 119 acres of alfalfa, and • 38 acres of mixed-grass hay. Approximately 20 acres may be retained for pastureland within the proposed equestrian center. Over 80 acres of open space will be preserved in parks, conservation areas, and green space 2.8.2 The Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts The unnamed drainage ditch currently conveys water to a downstream appropriator for a Farmer's Canal irrigation water right. The water is diverted from the Baxter-Border ditch at the south end of the property to the drainage ditch. Water in the drainage ditch currently flows north to Baxter Lane then east along the road until it intersects with the Spring Ditch. In order to maintain the irrigation water right, the point of diversion (POD) will be moved to where the Baxter-Border ditch crosses Baxter Lane. The water will be conveyed from the stream/ditch to the Spring Ditch through a headgate and into a pipe located on the north side of Baxter Lane. The proposed relocation of the POD has been approved by Mr. Bob Davis of the Farmers' Canal Board of Directors and the downstream appropriator. No other agricultural water use will be affected. 2.8.3 The effect on Local Services and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts The subdivision will be connected to the City of Bozeman Water and Sewer • System. Total daily water flows at final build out for the subdivision has been estimated to be approximately 700 gpm per day average with a peak flow of approximately 1900 13 gpm. Total sewage flows have been estimated at 354 gpm per day average and 780-gpm • peak flow. A new 27 and 24-inch sewer interceptor will be constructed in partnership with the adjacent Cattail Creek Subdivision. This interceptor will transport sewage effluent to the Bozeman Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Based upon initial review of the City of Bozeman Water and' Wastewater Facility Plans, the City's water and wastewater system should be able to accommodate the addition of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision. A water distribution system computer model and accompanying design report are currently being completed to confirm the ability of the existing water system. to provide water to Baxter Meadows. Design criteria for the new sewer interceptor line have been completed and approved confirming the ability of the City's wastewater system to serve Baxter Meadows. Preliminary discussions have been held in regard to fire and police protection and are ongoing. Depending upon the outcome of the discussions provisions for a new fire station may be made within the subdivision. A traffic study has been completed that address the effect of the subdivision on the surrounding transportation infrastructure. Contact has been made with Montana Power, QWest and AT&T. They are currently working on the design of electrical, gas and cable service to the subdivision. There has • been a commitment by these utilities to provide these services to the subdivision. American Medical Response has been contacted and has indicated that they will be able to serve the subdivision. BFI Waste Services has also indicated that they can serve the subdivision. 2.8.4 The Effect on the Natural Environment and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts Provisions will be made to handle site drainage and runoff. Storm water retention basins will be designed to remove sediment and control runoff to pre-development flows. An erosion control plan will be developed for construction of the site improvements. Storm water control facilities will be maintained by the City and/or subdivision homeowners association. Where possible wetlands and the associated wetland vegetation will be preserved or in some cased enhanced. Most of the site is currently cropland or pasture so little native vegetation exists. 14 • Impact to site surface waters will be mitigated with onsite storm water retention basins and other applicable storm water best management practices. Erosion control measures will be put in place during construction. A weed control plan will be developed for the subdivision. . 2.8.5 The effect on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat and Proposed Mitigation of . Impacts The subdivision is located near the edge of Bozeman where development is rapidly approaching the location of the proposed subdivision. The existing use of the site is solely agricultural. The site supports a dairy farm, cropland and pasture. No significant populations of wildlife have been observed on the property. There are probably populations of trout*and other fish in some of the ditches that cross the property, although no surveys have been performed to confirm numbers and species. The developer plans to provide some type of stream enhancement in the future in order to improve fish habitat. It does not appear that the proposed development will significantly . impact wildlife due to the lack of wildlife on the existing site. Green space and park • areas will be provided which may serve as habitat to wildlife such as songbirds and small mammals. The existing wetlands will be preserved to the extent possible. A regional park is being proposed for the site, which if implemented will significantly increase the amount of public land available in the area. Numerous pocket parks and green space will also be provided. A trail system is being proposed that will connect to the regional trail system. 2.8.6 The Effect on Public Health and Safety and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts There is little danger posed on the existing site from natural hazards such as flooding, snow, mud, rockslides, high winds, wildfire, steep slopes etc. The proposed development will not enhance or increase the danger from natural hazards. Storm water runoff will be controlled by onsite detention basins. There will be some effect from man-made hazards. Traffic volumes are expected to increase and new electrical and gas lines will be installed to serve the subdivision. However, roads and streets will be designed to safely accommodate increased traffic volumes and the majority of the electrical and gas lines will be buried. Fire protection • will be provided through the water distribution system and associated hydrants. Larger commercial and industrial structures will have sprinkler fire suppression systems. 15 • 3.0 COMMUNITY IMPACT REPORT 3.1 WATER SUPPLY See section 2.8.3 of the Environmental Assessment. Water and wastewater system improvements will be designed to meet City of Bozeman Standards and State Department of Environmental Quality Standards and Regulations. 3.2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL See Section 2.8.3 of the Environmental Assessment. • 3.3 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Solid waste disposal will be provided by the City of Bozeman or a private entity such as BFI Waste Services (see letter in appendix). It is anticipated that the final disposal site will be the Gallatin County Landfill. 3.4 STREETS AND ROADS 3.4.1 Description A significant network new roads will be required to serve the subdivision as shown of the site plans and preliminary plat. Existing roads that will be improved include Davis and Baxter Lane. Initially Baxter Lane will serve as the primary access route for Phase I of the subdivision. Subsequent phases will require the completion of Davis and Ferguson to connect to Oak Street, additional improvement of Baxter and Deadman's Gulch. Refer to the Baxter Meadows Traffic Study for further information. • 16 3.4.2 Access to Arterial As discussed above initial access to Baxter Lane will'be provided for Phase I on at least three locations. At the completion of subsequent phases access will be provided to Deadman's Gulch, Davis,Ferguson Road, Oak Street and Harper Puckett. 3.4.3 Modification of Existing Streets or Roads No road closures are anticipated. Refer to the Baxter Meadows Traffic Study for proposed improvements on existing roads. 3.4.4 Dust Street cleaning will be taken care of by the City of Bozeman or the homeowners association. Dust control measures such as watering of excavated and disturbed areas will be implemented during construction. • 3.4.5 Pollution and Erosion Storm water detention basins will be constructed to handle storm water runoff and to provide sediment removal. Roads will be maintained by the City of Bozeman and the homeowners association. 3.4.6 Installation and Maintenance Subdivision roads will be installed by Williams Brothers Construction and maintenance will be performed by the City of Bozeman and the Homeowners Association. 3.4.7 Traffic Generation and Capacity Refer to the Baxter Meadows Traffic Study 3.5 UTILITIES The subdivision plat has been submitted to Montana Power, QWEST and AT&T. These utilities are currently working on their site layouts for the subdivision. Copies of • their initial response letters are in the Appendix. The utilities have indicated that they can start installation this fall weather permitting or definitely in the spring of 2002. 17 s • 3.6 EMERGENCY SERVICES 3.6.1 Available Emergency Services Fire and police protection wiff be provided by the City of Bozeman. Discussions and negotiations are currently being undertaken to provide space for a new Department of Public Safety Facility in or near the subdivision. If this occurs the response time will be minimal. Ambulance service can be provided by American Medical Response. They have indicated that there should be no problem with providing service. Response time has not been determined. Medical service will be provided by the local hospital and medical facilities. A copy of the current preliminary plat will be submitted to the above emergency services. 3.7 SCHOOLS • 3.7.1 Available Facilities The existing bus system should be able to handle the additional students generated by the subdivision. Additional classroom space will be needed upon build out of the subdivision. Refer to February 26, 2001 letter from Gary Griffith of Bozeman School District 7 in the appendix. The subdivision will be served by the Bozeman High School and the Emily Dickinson Elementary School. 3.7.2 School Children Per the letter referenced in 3.7.1; the subdivision will generate the following numbers of students at build out: ■ K-5 235 students ■ 6-8 118 students ■ 9-12 157 students 3.8 LAND USE 3.8.1 Planning The existing site is zoned as R3 Urban Residential, BP Business Park, BP Open • Space, R3 Urban Residential, RS Suburban Residential. Adjacent zoning includes R-3 18 • Residential and AS Residential on the east boundary; AS Residential on the north boundary and south boundary. 3.8.2 Public Lands There are no public lands adjacent to the proposed subdivision 3.8.3 Adjacent Land Use Adjaeent use consists of agricultural use and residential homes of a rural nature. The proposed subdivision will blend in with its surroundings and should not affect adjacent land usage. 3.8.E Hazards There are no known hazards within the proposed subdivision boundaries 3.8.5 Nuisance There are no proposed land uses that will pose a nuisance. 3.9 HOUSING Phase I will generate the following types and numbers of housing units: 30 Estate Homes (single family) 20 Traditional Homes (single family) • 20 Village Homes (single family) 40 Cottage Homes (single family) 19 Town Homes (single family) 7 Live/Work (single family) 20 Condominiums (units) 1 Bed &Breakfast 1 Veterinary Clinic 1 Equestrian Center The subdivision will not be a second home or recreational subdivision. 3.10 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES The possibility of locating a large regional park in the southeast quarter of the subdivision is currently being evaluated. A conceptual plan for the park has been completed. It will include athletic fields, open space and other opportunities for recreation. A number of smaller parks will be incorporated into the overall subdivision layout. A significant amount of green space will be available in the estate home area. A • trail system is being proposed that will connect to the proposed regional park and regional trail system. 19 Phase I includes the following parks: • Linear Park: The Linear Park located at the east edge of the project site includes a variety of trail systems including pedestrian bike and horse trails. This park will be both active and passive in nature with combinations of activities. The wetland edge shall be planted with a variety of appropriate plant material. North Pocket Park: The North Pocket Park shall be an active neighborhood park. It shall include large open lawn areas as well as a tot lot. South Pocket Park: The south pocket park shall be a passive neighborhood park. Its components shall include strolling paths with benches. Equestrian Open Space: The equestrian open space shall serve the community as a facility for horse activities. Its character of open pastureland and fields shall enhance the natural environment. 3.11 TAXATION The tax revenue for the property will increase significantly and should provide a significant source of revenue for the City of Bozeman. 3.12 ACCESSIBILITY OF SERVICE SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES ■ Fire Protection 2.5 miles on paved route • ■ Police Protection 2.5 miles on paved route ■ Hospital 3.5 miles on paved route ■ Elementary School 1.5 miles on paved route ■ High School 2 miles on paved route 3.13 EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE Currently the 460-acre property supports a dairy farm operation. The site is used primarily for grain production, hay production and pasture. The property has been leased by a dairy operation for approximately 50 years. Undeveloped portions of the parcel will remain in production until development is completed. The site is currently fenced. Fencing that is shared with adjacent agricultural land will be maintained by the developer during site development. The homeowners association will take over the responsibility for maintaining fence line after build-out of the property. 3.14 EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURAL WATER USER FACILITIES Some minor re-routing of the ditches that cross the parcel may be required. Specifically at the north end of Davis where an existing culvert will have to be extended and along • Baxter Lane in order to accommodate road improvements. Enhancement of the Baxter 20 Boarder Ditch and the Spring Ditch to improve fish habitat may occur during future phases of development. Discussions will be held with the ditch company to reach an agreement on any modifications to the ditch system. 4.0 FLOOD HAZARD EVALUATION There do not appear to be any portions of the subdivision that are within two thousand horizontal feet and less than twenty vertical feet of a watercourse draining an .area of twenty-five square miles or more. No official floodplain delineation study has been made for the ditches in this area. The watercourses that cross the proposed subdivision are man controlled irrigation ditches and serve to collect groundwater and spring discharge. 21 • APPENDIX A WETLAND DELINEATION STUDY • WETLAND DELINEATION • WILLIAMS BROTHERS PROSPECTIVE PROPERTY BOZEMAN, MONTANA Prepared for: Williams Brothers Construction 5713 West Garden Spring Road Spokane,WA 99224-5302 (Project Code 191) Prepared by: W ETLANDS EST, INC. Pinewood Professional Center 670 Ferguson Ave., Suite 2 Bozeman, Montana Ph. (406)582-1992 June 2000 O TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page • 1.0 PROJECT SCOPE.................................................................................................... ......I 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION..............................................................2 3.0 METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................6 3.1 .Wetland Hydrology................................:..........................................................................6 3.2 Hydrophytic Vegetation.....:............................................................................................6 3.3 Hydric Soils ....................................................................................................................6 3.4 Routine Wetland Determination......................................................................................6 3.5 Wetland Types......:...................................................................... -.............................6 3.6 Wetland Functional Assessments............................................:..........................................7 4.0 RESULTS..............................................................................................................................8 4.1 RIVERINE WETLANDS (W-1, 3)........................................... 4.2 DEPRESSIONAL WETLANDS(W-4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11)...................................................8 4.3 ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS (W-2, 6)...........................................................................12 4.4 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................12 5.0 SUMMARY..........:.........................................................................................:.................14 6.0 REFERENCES................:.................................................................................................16 EXHIBIT A WETLAND DELINEATION MAP APPENDIX A COE WETLAND DETERNIINATION FORMS APPENDIX B- WETLAND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT FORM Figure Page Figure 2.1. Prospective Williams Brothers Construction property location map (USGS, • Bozeman,Montana, 1987). .....................................................................................................3 Figure 2.2. Aerial photograph of the prospective Williams Brothers Construction property (Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, 995)......................................................4 Figure 2.3. Streams and Ditches in the City of Bozeman(FWP, 1993);the prospective Williams Brothers Construction property is outlined in black..................................................5 Photo Page Photo 1: Riverine wetland(W-1)............................................................................................9 Photo 2: Depressional wetland (W4)...................................................................................10 Photo 3: Depressional wetland (W-10). ................................................................................10 Photo 4: Depressional wetland (W-8)...................................................................................11 Photo 5: Depressional wetland (W-5)........................................................................................I I Photo 6: Artificial wetland 6 ............................................................ ..13 i Williams Brothers Construction• • Page 1 . Wetlands West,-Inc. . June 2000 1.0 PROJECT.SCOPE In compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act, a wetland delineation was conducted .for Williams Brothers Construction by Wetlands West, Inc. in April and May, 2000. .The property is currently owned by White-Cannon Farms and is located west of the Bozeman city limits(Figure 2.1). The objective of the wetland delineation was to define the location, type, and extent of wetlands within the property boundaries for interested parties such as the prospective landowners, engineers,,and planners. Wetland types, location, acreage, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (COE) data sheets are included in this report. The delineated wetlands were surveyed and mapped by C & H Engineering and Surveying of Bozeman, MT. The wetland locations,types, and acreage are shown on Exhibit A. C • • Williams Brothers C00ruction Page 2 Wetlands West, Inc. June 2000 2.0 'INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION is The project site is located in Gallatin County, west of the Bozeman city limits, Montana, in the N '/a of Section 3, Township 2 South,Range 5 East and the S 'h of Section 34,Township 1 South, Range 5 East (Figures.2.1, 2.2,.and Exhibit A). The property lies at an elevation of approximately 4,700 feet and encompasses 470 acres (AC). Baxter Lane parallels the southern border of Section 34 and the northern border of Section 3. Davis Lane is the north-south route along the eastern edge of Section 34. The historic land use is agricultural, primarily for hay production and livestock grazing; the property has been leased for a dairy operation for approximately 50 years. The property is traversed in a north-south direction by four (4) waterways in Section 3 and three (3) waterways in Section 34. These waterways are shown in Figure 2.3. The remaining waterways, the Baxter-Border and Spring "ditches", are designated by the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) as stream/ditches. The Section-line ditch along Davis Lane is designated as a ditch by the FWP, due to the fact that the ditch is used only for the conveyance of Farmers' Canal irrigation water. The drain ditch around the agricultural field in Section 3 does not have a FWP designation, however, for the purpose of this report it is considered to be a true ditch due to its function in draining the field. Stream/ditches are, in part, naturally occurring streams or seeps that have been channelized by historic ditching operations to convey irrigation water, such as from the Farmers' Canal (Figure 2.3). According to the dairy farm manager, Tom Kingma, both the Baxter-Border and Spring ditches can be used to convey Farmers' Canal irrigation water, however, he has not opened the headgates to allow this water into the ditches for many years (pers. commun.).' 'Both • waterways have cobble beds with very little sinuosity due to channelization. The Baxter-Border ditch enters Section 3 through a culvert along the southern edge of the property (Exhibit A). This ditch exits the property along the northern border of Section 3 on Baxter Lane and flows west for approximately 1,200 feet where it turns north and flows through Section 34 to the northern property boundary. A third ditch, the Maynard-Border ditch, is piped through the property in the west half of Section 34 (Exhibit A). There is no surface water expression on the subject property from this ditch. The Spring ditch, which can be utilized to convey Farmers' Canal water, enters Section 3 along the southern border and flows north where it exits the northern property boundary in Section 34. This waterway widens into a wet meadow(W-1) along the north border. The agricultural field in Section 3, around which- the drainage ditch system was. established, is an historic (Prior Converted/PC) wetland as designated by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS). The PC is currently a cultivated agricultural field as shown in Exhibit A. The ditches effectively lower the groundwater table within the cropped area, and to some extent,the adjoining meadows. On the north end of the PC the ditches confluence into one waterway and exits Section 3 to join with the Spring ditch to the east. The Section-line ditch borders the eastern property boundary in Section 3, crosses to the east side of Davis road at Baxter Lane, then re-enters in the northeast corner of the property adjacent to the alder/willow . wetland (W-8). The Section-line ditch is dry during the off-season. • Williams Brothers Construction Page 3 Wetlands West, Inc. June 2000 The property has little structural diversity associated with the vegetation due to intense • grazing and agricultural uses. The exception is found in the southern portion of the Spring ditch in Section 3 where it is lined with various shrubs and a few cottonwood trees (Populus spp.); a small number of decadent shrubs also grow along the .stretch within Section 34. Shrubs were observed on the banks.of the Section Line ditch along the east border of Section 34. .No tree or shrub species grow along the Baxter-Border ditch; however, in Section 34,.north of the northern property boundary and within the adjoining property an aspen (Populus tremuloides) grove with a thick understory of shrubs proliferates along the waterway. In the northeast corner of Section 34 there is an alder (Alrrus sinuata)/willow (Salix spp.) wetland (W-8) with standing water. The wetland is relatively-undisturbed by grazing livestock. 4662T 1 � 471i ! \ I 4712 ' 47/6T..._. 4725 T i C7 I co N I 38 T I x 0 , bQv►•dAn I � I ' o I i "DURSTON ROAD •� Figure 2.1. Prospective Williams Brothers Construction property location map (USGS, Bozeman, Montana, 1987). • '�- - `:} �. ¢ fir •r,a r ,,, .,r �.Fr e�. +� �� �;Fa 4i��f��l C� �a r•�r{f'FL,xs4 r-'"' S.`1�n',;�,5���.> �,�._�e ^�•-� 3 T ! + x�, >7""} •�r7 yr+ £. G � rl� 4�'•t.{c��ri `IP:-'�'•. � •�' �''�. � _ .�'2"1„J��5.�..f����i' � C`♦. ;�-!� r. � .x �dv`7- ^���R�.`�- _ :Jr :; ,. '�+ .-.v' :'.�h��'��:w�. �N - r�1i�•� tt. ♦t..ak EF _ t`j'c r' y _." _• '• r.+r�'9„cP�.r= w+. i(v�!� Srf � T; +�S�j4��r� { t�A'�lay���`i ! �"" � i R ,�+ �"*�-`�sL�,`le •�� RY t{,s=s at4^ { � ;{ 7eM� v .F•b�•f �r �a�r r fit',aq Z e'U 'f. a��j, ?h� :.� jt>�.L`-t�s.h��Y�r,a��� =�`:'z. _ �. �+,��•i++ ���4..T' 1�>��'4�>,ar�¢r� II�,at���'�x ''�� �' Lt � ``` S>'�`e'�� � T ,ii. NI.=,F y `�Tr •• �a t.1.• �1�+ ^Y;y ?w.z T Fe e✓' SrI v > -f9 czsa � F+S`P �'7C�,`' a.. K -_ .�y+ �i�r.�' 4 �}""'�-t y t.. t �i4� ��'-fir+ �' TY w�Hr�,se�P� �'• ''� :^ <�tiY �. 4�s'�sY .,4 R• c -f ,i'?��" �.'-ea' � ..a< <�e...L. p�,�.,�y�'�i.,ey ^• fpiy 'rit x. �� ia� t-X a:.$ .rwi r'9rs I 2 ,04 �i NOW 1". .h"vrt's..� it S�rrr { r _•.3 t. ;. � 'S 4.a`+'r`�.'.t � �,°'.r'7 x,. y �" 1--4 �•S. s..ei ^ t y 4 32 c- :s •3n yy,� b- 't yc Q•sra�r r Y ."T r _1'< Y ''� ,� ��r1���•i�ix}`t a' i������ +�'��'t'�` �. S•. L- f ` d � " ' � 'rs ��t � 1y 1"Z'^. Crz }til¢.f y+,,,�.'Fy`+��-+ ! 4¢5 ��.N .G fi'- ,,_^'•_-a 'R 'SC'. r.ft -,-5 't Yt� .�J" y 4,g•fit'' �� : o e.c3'_ 4;:'fc.^ <, `"" P• u x _ ;s`��:r: .:f;[.;.. _.- �` � "L+�'��r7Co�ir� to�¢Y�i`�-�4 y�� r � c�"�..,����•tl4xj'��a`�'; �� ^.xy��s,"--'C.y.z- -,� �}..atY ?r, #s 2�' ' t L• J :. .S M ',�� T •2 Y�y� .c'r�� ,E;� _ - i. .!.. _.._c' .._:d._Y +•. i. r7l r� t o t t i Fec s j T -d. x' `�Sh� r 4 sr xt� S € cA� xa�tE� � : i s. tq.y ?�.Ft�"�p'd .4 ---e-S p ' t ti + £? c r t bi Sir s a ...14`y k eb '�� y y ',t',�iY�`� •�irtC -K�L >.rw .�v'����'S{t�, i.e p �to � •~Y.Y>+i} Fry t E(;'f t s � 1 .S, '.L �7';••" i q 8�er �,tr�v�'7 t •�3w 211 I. I..fk r� cT4� � it-tu�2' ,s' > >t €_fig i. 't r Ls Y ti 7 .ca x A�fh it �3-c3-ss rR's fx^a y-"� I¢i ✓' r t ' .y"'4E + �•t i � r � r S�e 4�:�gkj2`' �F � F F... 3x� _ f T x s ' ``� �� F s 7¢i. f2 fsf 1, rt t _ a3� � � ;l la �rG+-:4 -�'ayhh 5. ,r' >.�`•1� S � •- f" 5 s. � „i t fit v t -9 d 5• ',,�"+'� �r'•�y2L� 's Pr` �. � c. .3 e . l } � v.g iN a,r£,.. rt +!�h d h c ' ''tv - �• r y L. ��.. t Fi '" .t r r:f 7? 5.4 r f : t-+ �.;, U ,7 t?!,�•.i- j ti.y. -e �,t rn + c < N t { }t� e T-{ �.: S*' may,•> .:+�•� �s r 'ye 'A .b`^i,'� _M:`� S'F"' +2.�xr y� ty t � s� � u e}+e �'t��• -j•s; `y'h,}, 'YY �� �`�ln� 4 f ��, �t�'i+ �•s��.y�4 j. � > r s •, ;sk '. Wit. S>-.a 't< /'FI uC b i� zEh F rs w:, �f �•qa. - r�- Z"'s--r�-,�. ';G„ J''"...r.'?- w r�4..� -. sc fi 5.:v ."r _ G'1'• Williams Brothers Construction • : Page S . Wetlands West, Inc. June 2000 f NT R `%o- . ZS I I I jQ, t °i C.) 74i Figure 2.3. Streams and Ditches in the City of Bozeman (FWP, 1993); the prospective Williams Brothers Construction property is outlined in black. • Williams Brothers ConAon • Page 6 Wetlands West Inc. June 2000 3.0 METHODOLOGY The wetland delineation was conducted on site using the 1987 Routine Determination Method developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(COE). For an area to be classified as a wetland it must meet criteria for hydrology, vegetation, and soils. There must be a source of hydrology, a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation (>50%), and hydric soil indicators (Wetland Training Institute,Inc. 1995). A synopsis of each criterion follows. 3.1 Wetland Hydrology The technical criterion for wetland hydrology has been established as "permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation for a significant period during the growing season" (Wetland Training Institute, Inc. 1995). Surface water, groundwater, and/or direct precipitation may supply the wetland hydrology. 3.2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Plant species have been assigned a"wetland indicator status'by geographic region based on their probability to occur in a wetland (Resource Management Group 1993). Plants are categorized as obligate '(OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACU), or upland (UPL). A predominance (>50%)'of hydrophytic (water-loving) species provides a positive vegetation indicator that the area is a wetland: 3.3 Hydric Soils . Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) soil classification maps and field investigations are used to identify hydric soils. The NRCS conducted an Order H survey to • classify and map soil types within Gallatin County (MRCS 1999). Survey results are mapped at a scale of 1:24,000. Soil components less than five (5) acres are included in the descriptions as inclusions. Soil profiles are examined on site during the delineation field reconnaissance. Soil test pits are excavated to a depth of eighteen (18) inches where possible. The soil is examined for hydric indicators such as mottles (red to brown staining), sulfidic odor, organic soil material, saturation, and gleyed or low-chroma color as determined by a Munsell Soil Color Chart (Munsell 1994): Examination of on-site soil pits provides a detailed description of hydric or upland soil characteristics within a defined area. 3.4 Routine Wetland Determination A Routine, Level-2 COE Determination Method was utilized for delineating wetlands on , the Piper property. The plant communities, waterways, and general property characteristics were evaluated during the field investigation. Data was collected at eleven (11) sites and recorded on COE data forms included as Appendix A. Exhibit A shows the delineated and mapped wetlands (VV)- 3.5 Wetland Types Wetlands are classified based on hydrological and topographical similarities and, to an extent, dominant vegetation types. The Montana National Heritage Program (NNHP) has 10 defined five (5) major wetland types found in Montana: slope, depressional, riverine, lacustrine i Williams Brothers Construction • Page 7 Wetlands West Inc. June 2000 fringe, and artificial (N NBP 1999). Combinations of two (2) or more wetland types, or IPA complexes, may exist within one wetland system. Three (3) wetland types have been identified on the prospective Williams Brothers property: depressional, riverine, and artificial wetlands. Depressional wetlands occur in low topographic features. Dominant water sources are precipitation, groundwater.discharge, and overland flow from adjacent uplands (Brinson et al. 1995). Riverine wetlands are areas within the banks of a stream or ditch channel, including overflow and abandoned channels, and sloughs (M1g1T 1999). In general, the hydrology within riverine channels is supported by in-stream flows, although water may or may not always flow (Cowardin et al. 1979). Artificial wetlands are the result of human-related activities, such as irrigation or drainage operations. The supporting wetland hydrology may be associated with irrigation water, created groundwater seeps, or overland flow from human-related activity.(NEO P 1999). 3.6 Wetland Functional Assessments Functions of wetlands exist in the absence of man and are normally part of a self- sustaining ecosystem. Functions are the observable and measurable, inherent characteristics. of aquatic ecosystems that maintain or have an influence upon the system itself. The functional value of wetlands include several criteria, including: groundwater recharge and discharge; sediment trapping; nutrient retention and removal; food chain support; wildlife and fish habitat; and heritage values including recreation. The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT).Montana Wetland Assessment Method • (MDT, 1999) was used to assess the functional ability wetlands. The evaluation provides a numerical wetland category based on the above criteria. The categories range from I through IV; a Category I Wetland has the highest functional values, whereas a Category IV wetland has the lowest values. Functional assessments provide base-line data on the values of wetlands prior to any future activity. In the event that mitigation for any wetland impacts is required by the COE, or voluntarily mitigated or enhanced by the landowner, the functional assessments will provide the landowner and COE with comparative data. In most cases, the functional values of mitigation wetlands should be equal to or higher than the values of the wetland prior to disturbance. Wetlands within the same wetland type category were grouped and assessed for functional values. Wetlands 1 and 3 were grouped in the riverine wetland type category. Wetlands 4, 5, 7, 10, and 11 were grouped as depressional wetlands. Wetland 8, a depressional wetland, was Assessed separately. due to its higher plant diversity. The assessment results are discussed in Section 4.4;the completed assessment forms are included as Appendix B. IPA Williams Brothers Coction • Page 8 Wetlands West, Inc. June 2000 4.0 RESULTS The wetland investigation resulted in the identification of three (3)wetland types. Of the approximately 460.1 acres (AC), 26.2 AC or 5.7%, meet the wetland criteria. Wetland data sheets are included in Appendix A. The wetland locations, their areal .extent, and types are shown in Exhibit A. Each wetland type is discussed below in more detail. 4.1 RIVERINE WETLANDS (W-1,3) Riverine wetlands are areas within the banks of a stream or river channel, including overflow and abandoned channels, and sloughs (NINI P 1999). In general, the hydrology within riverine channels is supported by in-stream flows, although water may or may not always flow (Cowardin et al. 1979). Riverine wetlands comprise the second largest wetland type within the project. site with 7.5 AC or 1.6% of the total wetland acreage. The Baxter-Border (W-3) and Spring (W-1, Photo 1) ditches (stream/ditches) carry ground water throughout the year and were likely natural stream courses that were channelized to accommodate agricultural practices. Vegetation along the stream/ditches at the time of the delineation-was sparse due to grazing. 'The sample point (SP) was established within the Spring ditch (W-1) in Section 3, where patches of wild celery (Yallisneria americana, OBL) were observed and a few cottonwoods (Populus spp, FAC-FACW) grow along the banks. There are patches of beaked sedge(Carex utriculata, OBL) along the Baxter-Border ditch in the low-lying areas. The source of hydrology for the Spring ditch, according to the FWP streams and ditches . map, is a natural spring as well as irrigation water from the Farmers' Canal, although it has not . been used by the farm manager to convey irrigation water for many years. -'No soil pit was • excavated due to inundation. 4.2 DEPRESSIONAL WETLANDS (W-4,5,7,8, 10, 11) Depressional wetlands occur in low topographic features. Dominant water sources are precipitation, groundwater discharge, and overland flow from adjacent uplands (Brinson et al. 1995). Depressional wetlands comprise the largest group of wetlands within the property, for a total of 17 AC or 3.7% of the total acreage. Wetland 8 is the largest depressional wetland (11.0 AC), which is relatively undisturbed includes pooled water throughout most of the wetland. In general, all other depressional wetlands lack standing water or saturated soil conditions. Sample points were established in wetlands 4, 8, and 10. Wetlands 4 (Photo 2) and 10 (Photo 3) are very marginal wetlands with some slight hummock formation. Ground water in the area is assumed to be the source of hydrology, although standing.water in the soil pit and soil saturation were not observed at the time of the investigation. Wetland 8 (Photo 4) is an alder/willow wetland with surface water and saturated soil conditions. • �� '�4$ ib c5s x x 5 r:spt r`'st�a�xi t �OR5A��` y-�`;�-�.x� �.�� � iF e• "a r v}o 1S` v '}"c,rfi � 5�[ �4 .,d L'S '+. r'�! t..`4rFr.t', r'.2 .,a £' J J1'< � x J' ••F',r �-?'k"s? j�`Y r vo i".�.R.-f'S1'�y,,, xyd.� j.,,�•.+:. ��� .{ •�$r �� �'" }`' �� .r } I.0 4 Y �• d �F`jn.(��.,y ..! .]'6t �Z �,d. � R ! 3' T , r-`y �'dny:,5, ,p 1.•� r}, -sS �Kci",€,a" `�i�'G' `r 3� 3"y",J y.cr -r4 {, L i . / • • • • i 1 I I � • ' I • ��t7 �c�, ^� .S`S v � �'-i`u a�'�•a�,fi r.ta5iv.r• v v r ry..s - t' a�Y .�.zi '�sr+•- t "sry 5.s,- �'t''t 3' r.a K } �}Y;,{' d� '1 y �lip,�. ��•r'Y,�jy.tiai�Y'�7,a t f 4 L s,,,• 7�� q '3s �a Ktpy.�-:N t, d•*.�c n��',�' s,�,�aFr I �.� s�S�c' 'c ,�•M � 8 a"G ;�. s�a.`h .-.,ram 8 ar'+i t�sy` „\=i`3n t.�4 '••c c�a wR- {� �`�.i ice'•.i.y, a�'ria �"�y'�Se.��y�'." y.�•a,`` t-s�+'`3�z��2` ^r�, +��G '�2y�s n, a�„� i tn. � eis,�„C.. � �;'i" t� {.r `k �- ,�+�-, <'r.�.x �"� `Av n'��,dr• r"{� T.,.r't �: �,`�♦d a�`„�\--;5,{'? s, ��`�]+r �S ''"s"(� \4ti..s'=� �•�,�� ���c..� ��-,- ram. b __ r I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 11 1 1 11 II 1 1 1 1 1 n. �'. 'r _ _,- N's.`a•k_ 3'i7,om;* Y :'tL•c�-�yti-"AS• _ 1 ''' .,� i .r .,�r.3.Y.•• +. r y t � is •{� � rt�r -�'' r •�� 4.!` s- r .. Z II I I • •. . M1 i r f�, x !1 f. 1. 4f 1••1 I '`'. ri i ! a � i > Y'�r }t r �-K s, t ,{{i +: �..�2•}n S. 4 f a J�J 'i S r- q t t F r,.a� c.n� ��' .F% +••_F''!+•z, � s o i�r' - ,T i!1 � y < 'S' 1?,y � � �. 1'M �S xs._..ice. r 3 A d�Ar �h '1•h4 -'{' J r � r 1 r y i C i+•7fr'id�ri� � t� h. � E 1rl .s .r�•C i T�•nr1��>L k.�• t7 �! in y x 1 Y•, J � J �a .t\� L l i'' P�}" -1 Y`$ rr'•Z'� L �` s. ). F !+"" � � .� CyF t7 f< } �.u•r'' u- - t // Fo S 1 F9•..., nt't •.K "1 E •Y £ t!! 'tat� .h CS -� C Ji � � �••� . C.L :, �3 S e ��t� .Svo s ,5 y !'. �t }' +' L ;Y '� ,�',••'�'•1:;"���.. �R�{ c ..,�7 'ri � r,�.'. +�. � 0• ' ..( f j l 9 r •, -1 1 1,,,. ��'rr 6 � fir•, rX�> >i'L�. :zzt va 't;d.14 Y �,s.' 'ti ,f r .�-:a �. n r _. `� ,.v 4�,�+r-,.3�'�t"'� }Cy�* �'".,�s�!�'�"�•�'f•1�.e'��'4 ,}.t 'a• �7 'r.'S d y <' •,• e r t r7'+x..,vrF' 'r-r •v' ``'d7�-rr -r r;y_�t Z-s3 ,CfT' e 1, •J tJ Ii�� �ti�- kay. tt a�v +�'fc yr.�v�i<zPt�` VEZ SJ *y:'' "�s3 '1 -. s `,tn�"z�- •� �F va .+ ems.... � ".JS' {�z -n. -C c. '-f•: 2r �..Sa _, ,��r�i'<' k L�"• £i. ,� `-�< ca�s £h n? ,.� � s���-��{Z�'�1� � ESs.• z3.: �„r,..:n .''eta ,..`�''il �ao-'d X �.7'`-. ...'x. t1 rwrn� -.� r's�'!.)�•,�::^:2 .. ^wr.•v � y 'L r�y+c�'F � e.2�7"4'`C 9` ^"„"±«� �' .f•-. • ., s t �,=' ,�� ,�,'r m � .�. 1�s7�� 'aty_..l.�^,..L�• fit•.r�•}� ~Y�'y r-,:c_ a ' :'!- ••`•t.T , rf'•:�`i.r:y`..I:>j•t:9t.. _^•�--4."-3. Z '.�:t^� .`�:..+.,'tJ! .S J'Y-'•':..'';?..�' i'• ' :' t'� . ' ';i!a •'o�a!\v:�..;_ ! 4T :r'ft'• 3 's"J a•4 "'�'i9 �0. iyli� P�-r.�.•�.^':'.'�'T' • J J •6! f• ��".:Fij..:•'���4 `,.:,5�Lr� i'�b�a �'Y r .a... /, h °M•'*.i• .;' �J;ai :�•\!L� J. .1% }.\ a „j .7 �!>, �Mv".1l x•'/�F'yt, R1. '. .v 't .� !7r�� 3,,.,� t reS,�, ' t ,Jv\�e• v ar; p t :,.�, .� ;JV t. �•ti ti.y.�,� •Ya t a 3'P tili rd:�.' c { J y�;: w U Win' JA•�f%231 } ,?$ '���i '! L.y. .;T :•,F,. t ,i. �:!•'•11.^^wr ..� r- „_T• �k':.4G';:�r'.ir,• s .. f•; •u, J• -..i-.l t'-._cj''!.' .r+y1�' !\:• .'i. ;`iy '. t.'1,�;:, . .•�`t• !11.' ':y,r.u;de..•.'i•'' Ji�•(:!••,y`.. r��gRP`'..,, ,3_'a.�"•c1;�:�.:iJ ..�: •'Y.i4�.;{•":.i� ;k..: �.. ;�/; .:'je. :�,�. Sx�:': ��.i...ram., �:f:' �.e._.;�": _ ..�e•i. /`- �.'::� J' _•'1 J �• .,-�'�'• =i7}rt -+._t'2�2 :/�j5:v�:`a':^'..i� .�''�.'t,�l.`.•`�•�'•b�•'f •�• _ ' 4 r 1 • r � 7 • � 4 r r r • 4 4 II ' i r • i i ri i 4 • J 4 r � i i 4 ' ram,..... r'� �}`-t✓t� '�'t'�- -i'1�iy i.� 3p {1.hn.a. -w t ��s. 1: . � c 7;.��f'ei1•"-J.�� :,�. �.r.y�i�.�.r>' p„N!y 't`- .r .ram•:.'=.:^. :,;�::. .::-• . - ' rr i 1 iJ . Jt : i 7r i t ii 1 J r J Williams Brothers Construction Page 12 Wetlands West, Inc. June 2000 Soils in W- 8 and 10 were veryblack 10YR 2/1 to a depth 8 in h ' •( ) pt of 1 c es with no discernible mottling; however, the low chroma number"(1) is indicative of hydric conditions.. In W-4 the soil was black (16YR 2/1.) to a depth of 8 inches, which was interspersed with a dark gray brown (2.5YR 4/2) to a depth of 18 inches: Strong:brown. (7.5YR 4/6) mottling was - observed from 8 to 18 inches. Wetland 4 is located within an area of Turner loam(457A), a non- hydric soil classified as a Typic Argiboroll. Wetland 8 is located within an area of hydric Blossburg loam (542A), with inclusions of the hydric. Bonebasin loam. _ Blossburg loam is . taxonomically classified' as a Typic Halplaquoll and Bonebasin. loam is classified as a Fluvaquentic Endoaquoll. Wetland 10 is located within an area of the non-hydric soil Enbar loam (509B), with inclusions of the hydric Ophur loam. The taxonomic classification of Enbar loam is Cumulic Hapioboroll and Ophur loam is classified as Cumulic Endoaquoll. 4.3 ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS (W-2,6) The NRCS designates natural wetlands as those wetlands occurring as'a. result of natural conditions and artificial wetlands as those resulting from human activity. This human activity can be from irrigation structures, ditches, and artificial waterways which provide localized hydrology sufficient to have allowed wetland characteristics to develop. It should be noted that final discretionary authority over all wetland impacts, whether to natural or artificial wetlands, lies with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Artificial wetlands comprise the smallest wetland acreage . within the property (1.7 AC). The Section-line ditch and the drainage ditch (Photo 6) around the PC are considered artificial wetlands. Hydrology for the Section-line ditch is from the Farmers' Canal. The water in the drain ditch system surrounding the PC field.is derived from.groundwater but can receive water from the Baxter-Border ditch via a headgate on the south side of the PC (pers. commun. Tom Kingma). Vegetation in the drain ditch is sparse except for sedge species toward the south end where the channel widens and flow rate is slower. No soil pits were excavated in the ditches due to inundation. 4.4 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS All of the wetland groups were ranked as Category .III wetlands, however, there is considerable variability within a Category III rating. The grouped riverine type wetlands (W-1, 3) scored 43% actual functional points due to a low'rating in general wildlife habitat; sediment/nutrient/toxicant removal'; uniqueness, and recreation potential. The grouped depressional wetlands (W-4; 5, 7, 10, 11) was ranked as a very low- Category III (31%) due to low ratings in wildlife habitat, uniqueness, and recreation'-potential.., Wetland 8 also ranked a high Category III (56%). Though low in wildlife habitat value,.W-8 ranked high in several categories, including water storage and production -export/food chain . support. The complete functional assessment forms are presented in Appendix B. i'� k. i r •.'�� ,�E - � t '�yy n yam• yR F ''3 c MIAon �� s i. .•�f-_•� .3`'C e,�7'ry 't L�' ris _ �.+ °•a'(T ...3(,a. yy"��+•t x4 .c x'A}'-n M .y Y`der 4 E- 7 s.,, � -.r �j.`r•�"lC{1y.,af 9'f .� �. )a, � � �y pg+''�..{� ,9'�`h-yxk far�+ $! ..••l�`i�r ��, < 8 F-y �J �tL v'^"'/"V�"l'��Y��'�2 US.". -�f r .^: ? r. '"�.3.F-�,.�`,�. d1�S+•. '�•c��� - .. c ����,A�•y: r,'. 2;. '4� n st f.. i F .y ,,� Tw� atw• ��.-L �,.st'°x. -.y1 `�• ryb"f`.y�^h<SS,`..�, 1'r.`ai'�� i,�..L•.c ST�F° S r a s � .�'+aa" iy 'y., Zcb`'"..s`• '.° .'� if Wwra � 'tv o = a- .+. .vdS' ,.+�.. a a,;;• 1"T'Yafi.�.^ 1''#'�, .r.L°•c''yi 'S fa+'-: -tea`H � ,j i S•' S �"'?' �t f t r-..w-4 .� �.r t+.• �Y�^ "�s ''��'i�. 5r ��.•.� 4. � a. +� .x�>� �,- .;,e ,0.�����x '^ � � t�.�.r��^�'•q,'�.� �5 r.J Sy�F'S.�✓ca e� Ye`�a'�'� 't` -l� "Y� .s v sJ w f "` ``Z• r: t 4 {_ (.•£ tf x.'�.� E `'�v�xnt".N J- h J: cv s7R s{va z�X{�, r �1x i r - :.•1—ka y _"S a ,l ,�. .ems -1 "z S ay,w� "Cjr�a`a'' f33k�>:d�,�-'. •�i' -�J�t `t••'. A4 s 7' L a 4 - 5 t -a. ',• 5'' Y' r'fq , c. F r-oti.' +'�-F'a^i'f r<C'<��',✓ t a ,v'` ilm' "� /Y Y?i C'� {+^z 7 J tP�, i<Ls .t y 4Jti 4d��.-[man�'.s.x ,ji cv'�Ws�t�iti�j("£,�r..x'.'�•w�•�.�. � � '�� �.-� '' x•ss,�.�,.+ � k:"�'-r�•fix.F� -.,,x+i'F Ll�y�SC� a�-Vb����..' �1 V r � i,.3.. L7..o-z,�F �3�3•�,�},�,J,`6�i�Si eafl�� g�i��fi ry.;�y.y�,I`„`�' � .�c. .J - xtF`• ` � l• L. �j t 1. ,rt'7 J !: I _•.� Williams Brothers CoAction Page 14 Wetlands West Inc. June 2000 • 5.0 SUMMARY In compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act, a wetland delineation was conducted for Williams Brothers Construction by Wetlands West, Inc. in April and May, 2000. The property is owned by White-Cannon Farms and is located west of the Bozeman city limits (Figure 2.1 and Exhibit A). Three (3) wetland types were identified within the property boundaries: riverine, depressional, and artificial. Of the 460.1 acres (AC), 26.2 AC or 5.7% of the property meet the wetland criteria. Data were recorded for each wetland using COE Data Forms (Appendix A). A summary of the wetland types found on the property are presented below. Each wetland type, location, and areal extent is shown on Exhibit A. Recommendations for enhancement of the existing waterways and wetlands is found at the conclusion of this summary. • RIVERINE WETLANDS (W-1 and 3) Riverine wetlands comprise the second largest wetland type within the project site with 7.5 AC or 1.6% of the total wetland acreage. .The Baxter-Border (W-3) and Spring (W-1) ditches (stream/ditches) carry ground water throughout the year and were likely natural stream courses that were channelized to accommodate agricultural practices. Vegetation within the stream/ditches at the time of the delineation was sparse. The sample point (SP) was established within the Spring ditch in Section 3, where patches of wild celery (Vallisneria americana, OBL) were observed and a few cottonwoods (Populus spp, FAC-FACW) grew along the banks. The • source of hydrology.for the Spring ditch, according to the FWP streams and ditches map is a natural spring and irrigation water from the Farmers' Canal, although it has not been used by the farm manager to convey irrigation water for many tears. No soil pit was excavated due to inundation. • DEPRESSIONAL WETLANDS (W-4,5,7,8, 10, 11) Depressional wetlands comprise the largest group of wetlands within the property, for a total of 17 AC or 3.7% of the total acreage. A large percentage of the depressional wetland acreage lacks standing water or saturated soil conditions. It appears as though the soil has been adequately drained by the ditching operations throughout the property. Most of the depressional wetlands are marginal(W4, 10 parts of 5),without a strong hydrophilic vegetation presence lack of visible hydrology. Wetlands 8 and small areas of W-5 have areas of pooled water and there is an abundance of hydrophilic (OBL) plant species. Vegetation species in depressional wetlands includes: meadow(oxtail (FACW), dry spike sedge (NI or no indicator status due to insufficient information), Kentucky bluegrass (FAC), Nebraska sedge (OBL, sitka alder (FACW), Baltic rush (FACW+), fescue (FACU-FAC), orchard grass (FACU), beaked sedge (OBL), and timothy (Phleum pratense, FAC-). Soils in depressional wetlands ranges from the very black. hydric loam (10YR 2/1) to dark gray brown clay loam (2.5YR 4/2), and in some cases strong brown (7.5YR 4/6)mottling was observed. Williams Brothers Construction* • Page 15 Wetlands West, Inc. June 2000 • ARTIFICIAL WETLAND (W-2 and 6) The NRCS designates natural wetlands as those wetlands occurring as a result of natural conditions and artificial wetlands as those resulting from human activity. This human activity can be from irrigation structures, ditches, .and artificial waterways which provide localized hydrology sufficient to have allowed wetland characteristics to develop. It should be noted that final discretionary authority over all wetland impacts, whether to natural or artificial wetlands, lies with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Artificial wetlands comprise the smallest wetland acreage within the property (1.7 AC). The Section-line ditch (W-2) and the drainage ditch (W-6) around the PC are considered artificial wetlands. Hydrology for the Section-line ditch is from the Farmers' Canal. The water in the drain ditch system surrounding the PC field is derived from groundwater but can receive water from the Baxter-Border ditch via a. headgate on the south side of the PC. Vegetation in the drain ditch is sparse except for sedge species toward the south end where the channel widens and the flow rate is slower. No soil pits were excavated in. the ditches due to inundation. • FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS. All of the.wetland wetland groups were ranked as Category III wetlands, however, there is considerable variability within a Category III rating. The grouped riverine type wetlands (W-1, 3) scored 43% actual functional points. The grouped depressional wetlands (W-4, 5, 7, 10, 11) ranked a very low Category III (31%). Wetland 8 also ranked as a Category III (56%), though • possessed greater ratings in several categories than the depressional and riverine wetland groups. The complete functional assessment forms are presented in Appendix B. • ENHANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES The prospective landowners, the Williams Brothers Construction, have designed the development to avoid and/or minimize wetland impacts to the maximum extent practicable. The project planners and engineers have discussed the potential enhancement of all riverine wetlands to increase the sinuosity, repair and replant incised banks, and incorporate pools and riffles and wetland benches into the restoration designs. In addition, they plan to construct a public trail around Wetland 8, the alder/willow wetland, and to construct an open water, shallow wetland to increase waterfowl diversity. • V1lliams Brothers Cons • Page 16 Wetlands West,Inc. June 2000 ® 6.0 REFERENCES Berglund,J. 1999. MDT Montana Wetland Assessment Method. Prepared for Montana Department • of Transportation. May. Brinson, M. M., R. D. Rheinhardt, F. R.Hauer, L.C. Lee, W. L. Nutter, R D. Smith and D. Whigham. 1995. A Guidebook for Application of Hydrogeomorphic Assessments to Riverine Wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-11. Wetlands Research Program. U.S. ' Army Corps of Engineers,Washington,DC 20314-1000. Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C., LaRoe, E. T. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. USDA,Washington DC. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Greenlee, J.T. 1999. Ecologically Significant Wetlands in Flathead, Stillwatet, and Swan Valleys. Unpublished Report to DEQ and MNHP. Munsell. 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgan Instruments, New Windsor,NY. Natural Resource Conservation Service. 1999. US Department of Agriculture, Gallatin County Area . Soil Survey. Resource Management Group. 1993. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands Region . 9-Northwest. B. J. Sabine, Grand Haven,Ml. N Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M. M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experimental Station. Vicksburg,MS. US Geological Survey. Bozeman,Montana Topographic Map. 1:24,000. 1987. Wetland Training Institute, Inc. 1995. Field Guide for wetland Delineation: 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual. Poolesville,MD. WTI 95-3. 143 pp. • USDA nttes 22 September 2000 epa ent of grlculture atural asources :)nservadon Wetlands Nest Inc. arvice 670 Ferguson,Suite 2 r10 Fallon Street Bozeman,MT 59718 B )zeman,MT )715 Dear Barbara Vaugh, Enclosed please find the soils information you requested for S of section 34;T1S,R5E and NE V of section 3, T2S,R5E..Please note that Montana NRCS policy requires that we ask you to include the following.statement on all documents associated with an analysis or determination completed using NRCS's soils data or map information: This map and associated information are to be used as a primary reference source and are not intended for use in site-specific planning.This is public information and may be interpreted by organizations, agencies,units of government,or others based on needs;however,they are responsible for the appropriate application.Federal,state,or local regulatory bodies are not to reassign to the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS)any authority for the decisions they maim. If you have any questions related to this information you may contact me at 522-4011. Thank you for your cooperation and for your interest in the Gallatin County Soil Survey. • Since ly, Kimberly A.Donze Volunteer Enclosures • The Natural Resources Conservation Service works hand4n4md with 'dewQS ` ,�) 3h1o. 7-7�, 031 U �tS 0!> b File No. `'• .;�%. STATE OF MONTANA Department or Natural Resources and Conservation WHITE- - \ PINK—) 44 ^• ` CANARI WELL LOG REPORT ` GOLDENROD—DRILLER • State law requires that this form be "_.Zed cy the water well driller on any water well com- nZeted ;,y him on and after JuZu 1 1973 W7ithin six (60) days after comoletion of the well. WELL OWNER:Name Rn1-Prt_ .t_ ele-•,sn-+ Address - .. Box 1 _u +++^n t' WELL LOCATION: County (=-1 -„- ,'� , Sec.w _, Twp. 2 X S, Rg. 5 E hT PROPOSED USE: Domestic Stock Municipal Industrial Lawn and Garden Irrigation Other (if other, specify) METHOD DRILLED: Cable Bored 8. WELL LOG: Forward Rotary $Averse Rotary Depth (ft.) Jetted Other (if other, specify) From To Formation 1 -WELL CONSTRUCTION: Diameter of hole inches. Depth. ft. s� _ Casing: a1-Steel. Plastic Concrete Threaded _Welded Other (if other, . pecr.fy) Pipe Weight:Dia.: From: 11 To: C•: _12Ib/ft. cheahgVe feet r�_feet lb/ft.� fU inche€�� eet feet . lb/ft. inches feet feet Was perforated pipe used? Yes ) No Length of pipe perforated feet s casing left open end? Yes No ..as a.well screen installed? Yes �No Material Dia. inches (stainZess steel, bronze, etc.) Perforation type: slots _holes Size set from feet to feet Size set f roU7 feet to feet Size set from feet to feet Waa-a packer or seal used? Yes No If so, what material Well type: Straight screen Graveled Uses separate �heet:.i =neeea - .- _- Vwe-LI jk ufedY `-" -Yes- :- TE`STARTE�:' To what"depth? feet .Material`"u`sed in grouting' 10. DATE COMPLETED:.. '•` Well head completion: Pitless adapter v �P '�At 12" above grade o Other 11. WAS WELL PLUGGED OR ABANDONED? Yes NO (If other, sped f�- If so, how Was the well disinfected? Yes _)L No 12. ILLER S CERTIFICATION: WATER EVEL: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction Static water level--2.4_ft-below land surface and this report is true to the best of my If flowing: closed-in pressure psi knowledge. GPM flow through inch pipe Controlled by: Valve Reducers Other, specify DriZler's or Firm Name - License No. _LL TEST DATA:. Pump Bailer Other »� -- • (If other, specify) Address Pumping level below land surface: L- - - ft. after hrs. pumping___: gpm %u• - ft. after hrs. pumping gpm Signed by Date . '�' � � •=c�—. - ;�r1. fir•<, �.:.- . 506 -515 10 � F t i s % OR � 1 �' 8 +` ".Sod � yy'G !�� <i,F.� 5L�6 trt��t'S � ::�. � �. :. {r, ."fir.•;, k'�"::,. .:�..;�> `V :,�-. ii m: ?: 3 •'•��_ •raj' f , `��. _i.�.: - f . .��,, { �:� •:� • i - ^"T/i �;11.; j," � -1�• _ .�'S�'i4.Jt1:. ..�` � 1 ''�c � 'ti +.�g�� .l 75, qw 50 57 :`" • lob LN 538 1.4 If - - �=1-' ;s ��� it: •' i4'•: _ �� •3it:.:; r .�. `M' �;: �'~xi��•}':_ .?j i�.6" .�.' '�' '�al� 'i. `'tip - — !�p.r,�.,� •�.: .. •i' t. 1 '-��..:` _`'F.:4'�,i•.�`�'f:STit:/ , !•-_( Ci atW fI —.L.x 1. {J _ U ..y ' .T:x j IOC '�SI•t':'• �' ••� �'•� '— . _ •i -` •4 �•.t +�S'�_•'+��i iy 1 VIA l` \\.. .., tea. •; -,'F; .. _ ' ':, � T• � '� � ... •.tip Zb G1 Q SOB - 2 ) rV- LLtb 17 1•90/i�• t Ll 50 �•• _ - ;� t� �;. _ of � ` � ��I- N535 '-__ _:�_. 5 _ _. - -:,:tip 3..;,. '��-i y,. n- ;: — r ;..a".:r•?� f.i.ice' ,,"o, 17 :•L: .(.;•:LSD• {... _ m •:t ~ - . y57A a 'U57A 3A - + - +[ c• efr _ fir' ti' "'�•`- _ . �• I S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PACE 1 OF 4 TURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 SANITARY FACILITIES Consultants he information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation) I I I I I Map symbol I Septic tank I Sewage lagoon I Trench I Area I Daily cover and soil name I absorption I areas I sanitary I sanitary I for landfill I fields I I landfill I landfill I I I I I i I t I I I s: I I I I I nsterdam-------IModerate: (Moderate: [Slight (Slight (Good I peres slowly I seepage, [ I [ I elope I I I I I I I I lackdog--------IModerate: IModerate: ISlight ISlight IGood I peres slowly I seepage, I I I • I I slope I I I I I I I I IEs � I I I I I isterdam-------IModerate: IModerate: ISlight ISlight IGood I peres slowly I seepage, I I I I I slope I I I I I I [ I eagle----------IModerate: IModerate: ISlight ISlight IGood I peres slowly I seepage, I I I I I slope I I I I I I I I I I I I I ibar-----------[Severe: ISevere: Isevere: ISevere: Ivair: I wetness I seepage, I seepage, I wetness I thin layer, I I wetness I wetness I I wetness I I I I I A: I I I I I reeriv--------ISevere: ISevere: (Severe: ISevere: (Poor: I peres slowly, I seepage, [ seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I poor filter, I wetness I too sandy. I wetness I small stones, I wetness I I wetness I I too sandy I I I I I nebasin-------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: (Poor: I poor filter. I seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I wetness I wetness I too sandy, I wetness I small stones, • I I I wetness I I too sandy I I I I I S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PACE 2 OF 4 rURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued Consultants Map symbol I Septic tank I Sewage lagoon I Trench I Area I Daily cover and soil name I absorption I areas I sanitary I sanitary I for landfill I fields I I landfill I landfill I I I I I I :A: I I I I I loseberg-------(Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: (Poor: I poor filter, I seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I wetness I wetness I too sandy. I wetness ) small stones, . I I I wetness I I too sandy I I I I I )a: I I I I I :adowcreek-----ISevere: (severe: ISevere: ISevere: (Poor: I poor filter. I seepage, ( seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I wetness I wetness I too sandy, i wetness I small stones,. I I I wetness I I too sandy I I I I I LC: I I I i • eagle----------IModerate: IModerate: ISlight ISlight (Good I peres slowly I seepage, I I I I slope I I I I I I I I -odyk----------IModerate: IModerate: ISlight ISlight IGood I peres slowly I seepage, I I I I slope I I I I I I I I irner----------ISevere: Isevere: Isevere: ISevere: (Poor: I poor filter I seepage I seepage, I seepage I seepage, I I I too sandy, I I small stones, I I I wetness I I too sandy I I I I I .C: I I - .avers---------ISevere: IModerate: ISevere: ISlight (Poor: I peres slowly I elope I too clayey I I too clayey I I I I I ,agle----------IModerate: IModerate: Islight ISlight (Good I peres slowly I seepage, I I I I I elope I I I I I I I I DEPARTMENT OF AGRICr-TUBE PAGE 3 OF 4 RAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 SANITARY FACILITIES ote -- SANITARY FACILITIES report shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect, septic tank absorption fields, sewage lagoons, sanitary landfills. The limitations are considered "Slight" if soil properties and site features generally are rable for the indicated use and limitations are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties or site ures are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to overcome or mize the limitations; and "Severe" if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so difficult to overcome special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased maintenance are required. report also shows the suitability of the soils for use as daily cover for landfills. A rating of "Good" indicates soil properties and site features are favorable for the use and good performance and low maintenance can be cted; 'Fair' indicates that soil properties and site features are moderately favorable for the use and one or soil properties or site features make the soil less desirable than the soils rated "Good"; and "Poor" indicates one or more soil properties or site features are unfavorable for the use and overcoming the unfavorable erties requires special design, extra maintenance, or costly alteration. Ic TANK ABSORPTION FIELDS are areas in which effluent from a septic tank is distributed into the soil through urface tiles or perforated pipe. Only that part of the soil between depths of 24 to 72 inches is evaluated. The ngs are base on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Permeability, a high r P `e, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, and flooding affect absorption of the effluent. Large stones be or a cemented pan interfere with installation. Unsatisfactory performance of septic tank absorption fields, udj&cessively slow absorption of effluent, surfacing of effluent, and hillside seepage, can affect public health. ndwater can be polluted if highly permeable sand and gravel or fractured bedrock is less than 4 feet below the of the absorption field, if slope is excessive, or if the water table is near the surface. There must be turated soil material beneath the absorption field to filter the effluent effectively.. Many local ordinances ire that this material be of a certain thickness. 3E LAGOONS are shallow ponds constructed to hold sewage while aerobic bacteria decompose the solid and liquid es. Lagoons should have a nearly level floor surrounded by cut slopes or embankments of compacted soil. Lagoons rally are designed to hold the sewage within a depth of 2 to S feet. Nearly impervious soil material for the lagoon r and sides is required to minimize seepage and contamination of ground water. This report gives ratings for natural soil that makes up the lagoon floor. The surface layer and, generally, 1 or 2 feet of soil material v the surface layer are excavated to provide material for the embankments. The ratings are based on soil erties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Considered in the ratinge are slope, permeability, a water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, flooding, large stones, and content of organic matter. 9sive seepage due to rapid permeability of the soil or a water table that is high enough to raise the level of sewage ne lagoon causes a lagoon to function unsatisfactorily. Pollution results if seepage is excessive or if floodwater tops the lagoon. A high content of organic matter is detrimental to proper functioning of the lagoon because it Dits aerobic activity. Slope, bedrock, and cemented pans can cause construction problems, and large stones can ar,compaction of the lagoon floor. rARY LANDFILLS are areas where solid waste is disposed of by burying it in soil. There are two types of landfill, :h and area. In a trench landfill, the waste is placed in a trench. It is spread, compacted, and covered daily a thin layer of soil excavated at the site. In an area landfill, the waste is placed in successive layers on the ace of the soil. The waste is spread, compacted, and covered daily with a thin layer of soil form a source away t ite. Both types of landfill must be able to bear heavy vehicular traffic. Both types involve a risk of adopollution. Ease of excavation and revegetation need to be considered. The ratings in this report are based i. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 4 W.AL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • SANITARY FACILITIES mote -- SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued soil properties, site features, and observed performance. of the soils. Permeability, depth to bedrock or to a aented pan, a high water-table, slope, and flooding affect both types of landfill. Texture, stones and boulders, 1hly organic layers, soil reaction, and content of salts and sodium affect trench type landfills. Unless otherwise ited, the ratings apply only to that part of*the soil within a depth of about 6 feet. For deeper trenches, a citation rate •Slight• or *Moderate* may not be valid. Onsite investigation is needed. ELY COVER FOR LANDFILL is the soil material that is used to cover compacted solid waste in an area type sanitary idfill. The soil material is obtained offsite, transported to the landfill, and spread over the waste. El texture, wetness, coarse fragments, and slope affect the ease of removing and spreading the material during wet i dry periods. Loamy or silty soils that are free of large stones or excess gravel are the best cover for a idfill. Clayey soils may be sticky or cloddy and are difficult to spread; sandy soils are subject to soil )wing. After soil material has been removed, the soil material remaining in the borrow area must be thick enough !r bedrock, a cemented pan, or the water table to permit revegetation. The soil material used as final cover for a idfill should be suitable for plants. The surface layer generally has the beat workability, more organic matter than e rest of the profile, and the beat potential for plants. Material from the surface layer should be stockpiled for use the final cover. • CEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 3 JRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS Consultants I i I I I I I I tap symbol I Depth I Clay I Cation- I Soil I Calcium I Gypsum ISalinityl Sodium id soil name I I lexchange Ireaction Icarbonatel I ladsorption I I Icapacity I I I I I ratio I I I I I I I I I In I Pct Imeq/loog I pH I Pct I Pct Immhos/cml I I I I I I I I i[erdam-------1 0-8 1 20-27115.0-20.01 6.6-7.3 1 --- 1 --- 1 8-15 1 18-30115.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I IS-42 1 18-27115.0-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 15-35 --- 1 42-60 1 10-20110.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 I --- I --- 10-2 I --- I I I I I I I ,ckdog--------1 0-10 1 20-2711s.0-20.01 6.6-7.3 1 --- I --- I --- I --- 1 10-19 1 27-35115.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- 1 19-60 1 15-25110.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 1 15-30 1 --- I --- I --- I I I I I I I I to -----1 0-8 1 20-27115.0-20.01 6.6-7.3 1 --- I --- I --- I 8-15 1 18-30115.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- I --- I 1 15-42 1 18-27115.0-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 15-35 1 --- I --- 1 --- 60 1 10-20 10.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 I --- I' --- I 0-2 I --- I I I I I I I I gle----------1 0-6 1 18-25115.0-20.01 7.4-8.4 1 5-10 I --- 1 0-2 1 _-- 1 6-9 1 18-25115.0-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 5-15 I --- 10-2 1 --- 1 9-60 1 10-18110.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 1 IS-35 I --- 1 0-2 I I I I I I I I a.r-----------1 0-22 1 18-27120.0-2s.01 6.6-7.8 1 0-5 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1 22-49 1 18-27110.0-25.01 7.4-8.4 1 0-10 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1� 1 s-18 5.0-10.01 7.4-8.4 1 0-10 1 --- l 0-2 I --- I I I I I I I I • I i I I I I I I eeriv--------1 0-5 1 .18-27115.0-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 2-10 1 --- I 0-4 1 _-- I s-2s 118-35115.o-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 2-1s I --- l 0-4 I --- 12s-60 1 0-101 0.0-s-0 1 7.9-8.4 1 --- I --- l 0-2 I --- I I I I I I I I ebasin-------1 0-11 1 15-27115.0-20.01 6.6-8.4 1 0-15 1 --- 1 0-4 1 11-21 1 18-35I15.0-25.01 6.6-8.4 1 0-15 I --- 1 0-4 1 21-60 1 0-101 0.0-5.0 1 6.1-7.8 1 0-5 I I I I I i I I • I I I •I I I I I se -----1 0-15 1 20-2711s.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 1 0-5 1 -== l 0-4 1 --- 1 15-24 1 20-35115.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 I 0-15 1 - 1 0-4 I 1 24-60 1 0-101 0.0-5.0 1 6.6-7.8 1 0-5 I --- I --- I --- I I I I .S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 3 ATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS--Continued Consultants I I I I I I I I Map symbol I Depth I Clay I Cation- I Soil I Calcium I Gypsum ISalinityl Sodium and soil name I I lexchange (reaction Icarbonatel I ladsorption i I Icapacity I I I I I ratio I I I I I I i In 1 Pat Imeq/100g I PH I Pct I Pct Immhos/cml I I I I I I I I LOB: I I I I I I I I Meadowcreek-----1 0-11 1 18-25120.0-25.01 6.6-8.4 1 --- I --- 1 0-4 1 --- 1 11-25 l 18-25I15.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 1 --- 1 '-- 1 0-4 1 --- 125-60 l 0-5 1 1.0-5.0 1 6.1-7.8 I --- I --- 1 0-4 I --- I I I I I I I I SIC: I 1 I I I I I I 2uagle----------I 0-6 1 18-25I15.0-20.01 7.4-8.4 1 5-10 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1 6-9 1 18-25115.0-20.01 7:9-8.4 1 5-15 I --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1 9-60 1 10-18110.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 1 15-35 1, --- 1 0-2 1 --- I I I I I I I I 3rodyk----------1 0-6 118-22115.0-20.01 7.4-8.4 1 5-10 I --- I --- I --- 1 6-30 1 10-18110.0-15.01 7.9-6.4 1 15-30 I --- 1 0-2 1 --- • 1 30-60 1 10-18110.0-15.01 7.9-8.4 1 15-30 i --- I O-z I --- I I I I I I I I i7A: I 1 I I I I I I Turner----------1 0-6 1 15-27110.0-20.01 6.6-7.8 --- 1 6-12 i 25-35110.0-25.01 6.6-7.8 I --- I --- I --- I --- 112-26 1 18-35110.0-20.01 7.4-8.4 1 5-is I --- I --- I --- �P60 10-5,1 1.0-5.0 1 7.4-8.4 1 0-10 I --- 1 0-2 1 --- I I I I I I I I ianvers---------I 0-4 1 27-35120.0-25.01 6.1-7.8 --- 1 4-16 1 35-50120.0-30.01 6.6-8.4 1 --- I --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1 16-42 1 27-45120.0-25.01 7.4-8.4 1 15735 1 --- 1 0-2 I --- 1 42-60 ( 10-35120.0-15.01 7.4-8.4 1 --- I -' 10-2 1 --- • - uagle----------1 0-6 1 18-25135.0-20.01 7.4.8.4 1 5-10 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1 6-9 1 18-25115.0-20.01 7.9-8.4 1 5-15 1 --- 1 0-2 1 --- 1 9-60 1 10-18110.0-15.0'1 7.9-8..4 1 15-35 1 --- 1 0-2 I --- I I I I I I I I • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 3 URAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS note -- CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS s report shows estimates of some characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. se estimates are given-for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. Y as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 limeter in diameter. In this report, the estimated clay content of each major soil layer given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in meter. The amount and kind of clay greatly affect the fertility and physical condition of soil. They determine the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. y influence shrink-swell potential, permeability, and plasticity, the ease of soil persion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect lage and earthmoving operations. ION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (CEC) is the total amount of cations held in a soil in such ay that they can be removed only by exchanging with another cation in the natural soil ation. CEC is a measure of the ability of a soil to retain cations, some of which are at nutrients. Soils with low CEC hold few cations and may require more frequent U ons of fertilizers than soils with high CEC. Soils with high CEC have the potential re0ations, thus reducing the possibility of pollution of ground water. L REACTION is a measure of acidity or alkalinity and is expressed as a range in pH ies. The range in pH of each major horizon is based on many field tests. For many soils, ies have been verified by laboratory analyses. Soil reaction is important in selecting ps and other plants, in evaluating soil amendments for fertility and stabilization, and ietermining the risk of corrosion. :IUM CARBONATE is the percentage by weight of calcium carbonate in the fine-earth trial, less than 2 millimeter* in size. WM is the percentage by weight of hydrated calcium sulfates 20 millimeters or ller in size, in the soil. :LAITY is a measure of soluble salts in the soil at saturation. It is expressed :he electrical conductivity of the saturation extract, in millimhos per centimeter 15 degrees C. Estimates are based on field and laboratory measurements at representative !s of nonirrigated soils. salinity of irrigated soils is affected by the quality of the irrigation water by the frequency of water application. Hence, the salinity of soils in individual fields differ greatly from the value given in the report. Salinity affects the suitability of )il for crop production, the stability of soil if used as construction material, and potential of the soil to corrode metal and concrete. U, RPTION RATIO (SAR) expresses the relative activity of sodium ions in tan eactions in the soil. SAR is a measure of the amount of sodium relative to :ium and magnesium in the water extract from saturated soil paste. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 2 Al RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • SOIL FEATURES Consultants Bedrock I Cemented pan I Subsidence I I Risk of corrosion I I I I Potential I p symbol I I I I I I Ifrost action) Uncoated I soil name I Depth IHardnessl Depth I Kind lInitiall Total I I steel I Concrete I I I I I I 1 I I I in I I In I I In I ' In I I I I I I I I I I I I erdam-------I --- I --- I --- I' --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I kdog--------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- 'I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I erdam-------I --- I --- ( --- I --- i --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I i I I I I le----------I =-- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I r-----------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IHigh IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I • eriv--------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IHigh IModerate ILow I i I I I I I I I basin-------I --- 1 --- I --- I --- I --- I --- (Nigh IModerate ILow I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I sberg-------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IHigh IModerate ILow I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I owcreek-----I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IHigh (Moderate ILow I I I I I I 1 I I le----------I --- I --- i --- I --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh Imo. ' I 1 I I I I I I I yk----------I --- I --- 1 --- I --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I er----------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I era---------I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- I --- ILow IHigh ILow I I I I I I I I I le----------I '-' I --' I --- I -'- I --- I --- IModerate IHigh ILow • I I I I I I I I I DEPARTY-ENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 2 VRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 SOIL —ATURES mote -- SOIL FEATURES Us report gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves' igineering considerations. epth to bedrock is given if bedrock is within a depth of 5 feet. The depth is based on many soil borings and on >servations during soil mapping. The rock is either 'Soft" or "Hard'. If the rock is •Soft• or fractured, excavations to be made with trenching machines, backhoes, or small rippers. If the rock is "Hard" or massive, blasting or )ecial equipment generally is needed for excavation. :mented pans are cemented or indurated subsurface layers within a depth of 5 feet. Such pans cause difficulty in ccavation. Pans are classified as "Thin" or 'Thick'. A "Thin" pan is less than 3 inches thick if continuously idurated or less than 18 inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Excavations can be made by trenching machines, tckhoes, or small rippers. A "Thick" pan is more than 3 inches thick if continuously indurated or more than 18 tches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Such a pan is so thick or massive that blasting or special equipment is !eded in excavation. tbsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence !su from either desiccation and shrinkage or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage. tbee takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. .This report shows the expected initial Lb e, which usually is a result of drainage, and total subsidence, which usually is a result of oxidation. Not town in the report is subsidence caused by an imposed surface load or by the withdrawal of ground water throughout t extensive area as a result of lowering the water table. ttential frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the formation of ' :gregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost :tion occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density, permeability, intent of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the .tential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially 'aimed. Silty and highly structured clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to root action. well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil length during thawing cause damage mainly to pavements and other rigid structured. . sk of corrosion pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that dissolves or weakens .coated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, .rticle-eize distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special to examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors creates a severe corrosion environment. The steel stallations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than steel in .stallations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of rrosion, expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High", is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical sistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract. r concrete, the risk of corrosion is also expressed as 'Low*, "Moderate", or "High". It is based on soil texture, ir.and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract. s � DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE *- OF 3 URAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT Consultants information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation) 4ap symbol I Shallow I Dwellings I Dwellings I Small I Local roads I Lawns and ad soil name I excavations I without I' with I commercial I and streets I landscaping I I basements [ basements I buildings I I I I I I I I sterdam-------ISlight (Slight [Slight ISlight IModerate: ISlight frost action, I I I ( I I low strength I' I I I I I I :ckdog--------ISlight ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: ISlight frost action, I • I I I I [ low strength I I I I I I I [ I I I I I iterdam-------ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: (Moderate: ISlight I I I I elope I frost action, I I I I I I low strength I I I I I I I tgle----------ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: IModerate- ISlight I I I I slope I frost action I I I I I I I V Ar-----------ISevere: [severe: [severe: [severe: [severe: . ISlight I cutbanks cave,[ flooding. I flooding, I flooding I frost action I I wetness I I wetness I ( I I I I I I [ veriv--------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: Isevere: ISevere: I cutbanks cave,[ flooding. I flooding, I flooding, I frost action. I wetness I wetness I wetness I wetness I wetness I wetness I I I I I I I ebasin-------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: I cutbanks cave,[ flooding, I flooding, I flooding, I frost action, I wetness I wetness I wetness I wetness I wetness I wetness I I I I I I I I I I I I I. • asberg-------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: [Severe: ISevere: [Moderate: I cutbanks cave,[ wetness I wetness I wetness I frost action i large stones, [ wetness I I I I I wetness I I I I I I S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 3 XURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT--Continued Consultants I I I I I I Map symbol I Shallow I Dwellings I Dwellings I Small I Local roads I Lawns and and soil name I excavations i without I with I commercial I and streets I landscaping I basements I basements I buildings I I I I I I I I I I I I i .OB: I I I I leadowcreek-----ISevere: IModerate: ISevere: (Moderate: ISevere: ISlight I cutbanks cave,( wetness I wetness I wetness I frost action I I wetness I ( I I I I I I I I I 1C: I I I I I I eagle----------ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: IModerate: ISlight I I I I slope I frost action I I I I I I I rodyk----------ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: IModerate: ISlight I I I I slope I frost action I I I I I I I 7A I I --------ISevere: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: IModerate: I cutbanks cave I shrink-swell I wetness I shrink-swell I frost action, I droughty, I I I I I shrink-swell I large stones I I I I I I SC: I I I I i anvers---------IModerate: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ISlight I too clayey I shrink-swell I shrink-swell I shrink-swell I low strength, I I I I I I shrink-swell I I I I I I I eagle----------ISlight ISlight ISlight IModerate: IModerate: ISlight i I I I elope I frost action I I I I I I I • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 3 URAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT note -- BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT s report shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect shallow excavations, dwellings with and without . ements, small commercial buildings, local roads and streets, and lawns and landscaping. The limitations are ight", "Moderate", or "Severe". The limitations are considered 'Slight" if soil properties and site features are erally favorable for the indicated use and limitaions are minor and easily overcome; 'Moderate' if soil properties site features are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to rcome or minimize the limitations; and 'Severe* if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so ficult to overcome that special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased ntenance are required. Special feasibility studies may be required where the soil limitations are severe. LLOWEXCAVATIONS are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for basements, graves, utility lines, n ditches, and other purposes. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of soils. The ease of digging, filling, and compacting is affected by the depth to bedrock, a cemented pan, or a very m dense layer; stone content; soil texture; and slope. The time of the-year that excavations can be made is . ected by the depth to a seasonal high water table and the susceptibility of the soil to flooding. The resistance of excavation walls or bands to sloughing or caving is affected by soil texture and the depth to the water table. LLINGS AND SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS are structures built on shallow foundations on undisturbed soil. The load it is the same as that for single-family dwellings no higher than three stories. Ratings are made for small • nercial buildings without basements, for dwellings with basements, and for dwellings without basements. The ratings based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. A high water table, depth to bedrock to a cemented pan, large stones, slope, and flooding affect the ease of excavation and construction. Landscaping grading that require cuts and fills of more than 5 or 6 feet are not considered. %L ROADS AND STREETS have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They e a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or stabilized soil material, and a cible or rigid surface. Cuts and fills are generally properties, site features, and observed performance of the Ls. Depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, a high water table, flooding, large stones, and slope affect the ease of ivating and grading. Soil strength (as inferred from the engineering classification of the soil), shrink-swell :ntial, frost action potential, and depth to a high water table affect the traffic-supporting capacity. is AND LANDSCAPING require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and stained. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Soil :tion, a high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40 ies, and the content of salts, sodium, and sulfidic materials affect plant growth. Flooding, wetness, slope, ►iness, and the amount of sand, clay, of organic matter in the surface layer affect trafficability after vegetation !stablished. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 5 URAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 HYDRIC SOILS LIST MAPUNITS WITH HYDRIC COMPONENTS Consultants "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or n-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491, e, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by tion 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the 'Criteria for Hydric Soila" endnote to determine the meaning of these columns. .Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. I I I I FSA Criteria and i Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I Map Symbol IComponent(C)/I I I I I Mapuait Name lInclusion(I)'l Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I I I I I Landform 1. Criteria lSaturation I Flooding IPonding IConditionl Needs I I ( I I Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial of Soil Ion-Site I I I I I I I I xE ONEBASIN I I I I I I I I I 1 2 PERCENT I I I I I I I I I I )PES----------------IThreeriv (C)-I YES IFlood Plain 12B3 I YES I NO I NO I I I lBonebasin (C)l YES (Flood Plain 12B3 I YES I NO . I NO I I I IThreeriv (I)-1 NO I I I I I I I I IBlossberg (I)l YES IMarsh 12B3 I YES I NO I NO I I I I I I I I I I I I I ►_: I I I I I I I I I I )SSBERG LOAM, 0 TO ?ERCENT SLOPES------IBlossberg (C)l YES IStream Terracel 2B3 I YES I NO I NO I I I lBonebasin (I)l YES (Terrace 12B3,3 I YES I NO I YES I I I IMeadovereek I I I I I I I I I I cI)---------I No I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 5 URAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 .• HYDRIC SOILS LIST MAPGYITS WITH HYDRIC INCLUSIONS Consultants "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or n-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491. e, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by tion S12.11(h)(4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils" endnote to determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. I I I I I FSA Criteria and I I I I I Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I Nap Symbol IComponent(C)/I I I Napunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric ( Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I I Landform I Criteria ISaturationlFloodinglPonding IConditionl Needs I I I I I Code I Criteria I Criteria l Criteria l of Soil Ion-Site I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 3AR LOAM. 0 TO a I I I I I` I I I I I • ICENT SLOPES--------IEnbar (C)----I NO I I I I I I I I INythar (I)---I YES (Flood Plain 12B3 I YES I NO I NO ( I I (Straw (1)----I NO I I I I I I I I I I ►DOWCREEK LOAM, 0 4 PERCENT SLOPES---IMeadowcreek I I I I I I I I I I (C)---------I No I I I I I I I I IBlossberg (I)I YES ITerrace 12B3 ( YES I NO I NO I I I (Beaverton (I)I No I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF S JRAI• RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • HYDRIC SOILS LIST NON-HYDRIC MAPUNITS Consultants "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or i-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States* (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by :ion,S12.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils, endnote to ietermine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. I I I I FSA Criteria and I i I I I Hydric $oils Criteria I Information I ' tap Symbol !Component(C)/I Iapunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric .1 Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I 1 I I I Landform I Criteria ISaturationlFloodinglPonding IConditionl Needs I I I I I Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial of Soil Ion-Site I I i I I 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :TH ILT LOAM, I I I I I I I I I I 04 SLOPES-I Amsterdam (C)I NO I I I I I I I I IQuagle (I)---I NO I I I I I I I I 1Blackdog (I)-1 NO I I I I I I I I l.Bowery (I)---I No I I I I I I I I IMeagher (I)--I NO I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i CM= SILT LOAM, o f I I I I I I I I I 4 PERCENT SLOPES---IBlackdog (C)-I NO I I I I I I I I IMeagher (I)--I No I I I I I I I I (Bowery (I)---I No I I I I I I I I lQuagle (I)---I NO I I I I I I I I I I F • 1 I I I I I I i I rERDAM-QUAOLE SILT I I I I I I ( I I I MS, 4 TO B PERCENT 1 I I I I I I I I I PES----------------!Amsterdam (C)l No I I I I 1 I I I IQuagle (C)---I No I I I I I I I I IBeanlake (I)-I NO I I I I I I I I IMeagher (I)--I No I I I I I I I I ;Bowery (i)---I NO 1 I I I I I I I • ! I I I I I I I I I ' 'LE -BRODYK SILT I I I I I ( I I I I es a PERCENT I I I I I I I I I I ?Es�-----------lQuagle (C)---I No I I I I I I I I IBrodyk (C)---I NO I I I I I I I I !Amsterdam (I)I NO 1 I I I I I I I ;Anceney (I)--I No I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! I I � s '.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 5 ATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22 HYDRIC SOILS LIST NON-HYDRIC MAPUNITS--Continued Consultants he "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or Non-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. 1491. une, .1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by ection 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils° endnote to o determine the meaning of these columns.' Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. , I I I ( I FSA Criteria and I I I I Hydric Soils Criteria I Information I :ap Symbol IComponent(C)/.I I I I I apunit Name IInclusion(I) I Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural I I I I Land form I Criteria ISaturation lFlooding IPonding IConditionl Needs I I I I I Code I Criteria ICriteria lCriteria l of Soil IOn-Site I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • rER LOAM. :RATELY WET, 0 TO I I I I I I I I I I ..RCENT SLOPES------ITurner (C)---I NO I I I I I I I I IBeaverton (I)I No I I I I I I I I ITurner (1)---I NO I I I I I I I I IMeadoxcreek I I I I I I I I I 1 (1)---------I NO I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I I I s�ERs-ptn►GI.E I I I I I I I I I I :MPI 4 TO e I I I I I I I I I 1 PERCENT SLOPES--------IDanvere (C)--I No I I I I I I I I Ipuagle (C)---I No I I I I I I I I IHeaghar (1)--I No I I I I I I I I (Danvers (I)--I NO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • S. CEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF i �IAT*RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE HYDRiC SOILS CRITERIA CODES AND DEFINITIONS :ndnote -- HYDRIC SOILS LIST 'he column 'Natural Condition of the Soil' indicates the following information: 'Wooded' indicates the soil supports +oody vegetation under natural condition; 'Farmable' indicates the soil can be farmed under natural conditions without. 7emoving woody vegetation or other manipulation; and 'Neither' indicates neither of the above conditions are met. All Histosols, except Folists, or Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups. Albolls suborder, Aqufsalids, Pachic subgroups, or.Cumulic subgroups that are: a. somewhat poorly drained with a water table equal to 0.0 foot (ft.) from the surface during the growing season', or b. poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: (1) water table equal to 0.0 ft. during the growing season if textures are coarse sand, sand, or fine sand in all layers within 20 inches (in.), or for other soils, or (2) water table at less than or equal to 0.5 ft. from the surface during the growing season if permeability is equal to or greater than 6.0 in/hour (h.) in. all layers within 20 in., or -3) water table at less than or equal to 1.0 ft. from the surface during the growing season, if permeability is less than • 6.0 in./h. in any layer within 20 in., or Soils that are frequently ponded for long or very long duration during the growing season, or Soils that are frequently flooded for long or very long duration during the growing season. • .S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 5 4TURAL RESOURC=S CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES Consultants Classification I Fragments I Percentage passing I I Map symbol J Depth I USDA texture I I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name 1 I I I l >10 1 3-10 1 1 limitlticity I Unified I AASHTO lincheslinchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 l (index I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I In I I I I Pct l Pct I I I I I Pct l I I I I I I I I I i I I B_ . I I I I I I ( I I I I I msterdam-------1 0-8 ISilt loam ICL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100175-95 125-301 5-10 . 1 8-15 ISilt loam, verylCL, CL-ML IA-4, A-6 1 0 1 0 1 100 1100 195-100180-95 125-351 5-15 I I fine sandy I. I I I I I I I I I I I loam, silty 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I clay loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 15-42 Isilt loam, verylCL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 1 25-301 5-10 I I fine sandy I I loam 42-60 ISilt loam, verylCL-ML, ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 1 200 1 100 195-100170-90 1 20-301 NP-10 I I fine sandy I I I I I I I I I I • I I loam I I 1 I I I I I I I I jam, I I I I I I I I I I I lackdog--------1 0-20 ISilt loam JCL-ML IA-4 10 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 1 25-301 5-10 . 1 10-19 ISilty clay loamlCL JA-6 I 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100185-95 1 30-401 10-20 1 19-60 ISilt loam ICL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100160-90 1 25-301 5-20 ; I I I I I I I I I I I IC: I I I I I I I I I I I I wterdam-------1 0-8 ISilt loam ICL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 200 1 100 195-100175-95 1 25-301 5-10 I e-15 ISilt loam, verylCL, CL-ML JA-4, A-6 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-95 1 25-351 5-15 l 1 fine sandy 1 I I I I I I I I I I loam, silty I I clay loam l I I I I I I I I I 1 15-42 (Silt loam, verylCL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 1 266 l 100 195-200160-90 1 25-301 5-10 I I fine sandy 1 I I I ( I I I I I I I loam 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 42-60 ISilt loam, verylCL-ML, ML JA-4 1 0 I 0 1 100 1 100 195-100170-90 1 20-301 NP-10 I I fine sandy. I I loam I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I agle----------1 0-6 ISilt loam ICL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100175-85 1 25-301 5-10 1 6-9 JSilt loam ICL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 1 25-301 5-10 1 9-60 ISilt loam JCL-ML, ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 195-100190-95 180-90 1 20-301 UP-10 I I I I I I I I I I I • .S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. PAGE 2 OF 5 %TURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued Consultants Classification I Fragments I Percentage passing I I Map symbol I Depth J USDA texture I I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name I I I I I >10 1 3-10 1 1 limitlticity, I I I Unified I AASRTO lincheslinchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1. Jindex I I I I I I I I I I I i I In I I I I Pct I Pct 1 I I I I Pct 1 9B: I I I I I I I I I I I I Abar-----------1 0-22 1Loam ICL-ML IA-4 1 .0 1 0 100-100175-100160-85 ISO-75 1 20-301 5-10 1 22-49 [Loam, sandy JCL-ML, ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 180-100175-100160-85 ISO-7S 1 20-301 NP-10 I I loam I I I I I I I 1 49-60 IVery gravelly IGM, GP-GM IA-1, A-2 1 0 1 0-10 125-60 115-50 110-40 1 5-30 1 15.2SI NP-5 I I sandy.loam. I I I I I I I I I I I I very gravelly I I I loamy sand. I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I' I gravelly sandyl I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I I I SA10 I I I I I I' I I I I I I areeriv--------I 0-5 ILoam 1CL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100175-95 I55-75 1 25-301 5-10 15-25 IStratified JCL, CL-ML, JA-4, A-6 1 0 1 0 190-100185-100160-95 135-70 1 25-351 5-15 I I sandy loam to 1 SC, SC-SM I I I I I I I I I I I silty clay I I I I I I I I I I I I loam 1 25-60 lExtremely IGM, GP-GM JA-1 1 0 I15-3S 135-60 125-SS 120-40 1 5-15 1 15-201 NP-5 I I gravelly loamy) I I I I I I I I I I I sand. very I I I I I I I I I I I I cobbly loamy I I I coarse sand, I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 very gravelly I I I I I I I I 1 1 inebasin-------1 0-11 ILoam JCL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100175-95 ISS-75 125-301 5-10 1 11-21 IStratified JCL, CL-ML, JA-2, A-4, A-61 0 1 0 195-100190-100160-90 130-70 1 2S-3SI 5-15 I I sandy loam to J•SC, SC-SM I I I I I I I I I I I silty clay I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 21-60 IVery cobbly IGM, GP-GM, JA-1 1 0 110-45 125-60 120-55 110-40 1 5-15 1 20-251 NP-5 I I -loamy coarse I SM, sP-SM I I sand, very I I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly I I I I I I I I I I i 1 coarse sand, 1 I I I I I I I I I • I I extremely I I cobbly loamy 1 I I I I I I I I I I I sand I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF '5 WAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued Consultants I I I Classification I Fragments I Percentage passing I I Map symbol I Depth I USDA texture 1 I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- .nd soil name I I I I I >10 1 3-10 1 1 limitlticity I I I Unified I AASHTO lincheslinchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 l lindex I I I I I I I I I I i I In I I I 1 Pct 1 Pct I I I I i Pot I I I I I I i I I i i I I A: I I I I ► I I I I I I I ossberg-------1 0-15 ILoam JCL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0-10 190-100185-100170-9S 150-75 1 25-301 5-10 1 15-24 lravelly loam, JCL, CL-ML, JA-2, A-4, A-61 0 1 0-1S 170-100165-100150-95 130-60 1 2573SI 5-15 I I clay loam. I sc, SC-SM I I I I I I I I I I I sandy clay I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 24-60 leery cobbly IGM, GP-GM, JA-1 1 0 130-45 125-7S 120-70 110-50 1 S-20 120-25I NP-S I I sand, very I SM, SP-SM I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly loamyl I I I I I I I I I I I coarse sand, I I extremely I I gravelly loamy) I I coarse sand I I I I• I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I adoxcreek-----1 0-11 1Loam JCL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100170-95 I50-75 1 20-301 5-10 1 I1-25 ILoam, sandy JCL-ML, SC-SM JA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100170-90 140-75 1 20-301 5-10 . I I loam, silt I I I I I I I I I I I I loam 125-60 lVery gravelly JGP, GP-GM JA-1 1 0 1 0-10 125-45 115-35 110-25 1 0-10 1 --- I NP I I sue, I I I I I I I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly sand.I I I very grayly I I I I I I I I I I I I loamy sand I I I I I I I I I -• I I I I I I I I I I I I Lgle----------1 0-6 ISilt loam ICL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 '1 100 1 100 195-100175-85 1 25-301 5-10 1 6-9 ISilt loam JCL-ML JA-4 1 0 l 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 125-301 5-10 1 9-60 ISilt loam ICL-ML, ML JA-4 J 0 1 0 1 100 195-100190-95 180-90 1 20-301 NP-10 I I I I I I I I I I I I xlyk----------1 0-6 ISilt loam JCL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 19S-100175-85 1 25-301 5-10 1 6-30 (Silt loam JCL-ML JA-4 l 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 1 20-251 5-10 130-60 1Silt loam, verylCL-ML JA-4 I 0 1 0 1 100 195-100190-95 180-90 1 20-251 5-10 I I fine sandy 1 I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I I I • '.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF ' S AT.JRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES--Continued Consultants Classification 1 Fragments I Percentage passing I I Map symbol I Depth I USDA texture 1 I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name I I I I I >10 1 3-10 1 1 limitlticity I I I Unified I AASHTO lincheslinchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1 lindex i I I I I I I I I I I I I In I I I I .Pct I Pct I i 1. I l Pct I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 S7� 1 I I I I I I I I I I I IUrner----------1 0-6 1Loam ICL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0-10 180-100175-100165-95 150-75 1 25-301 5-10 1 6-12 1Clay loam, JCL, GC, SC JA-6 1 0 1 0-10 165-100160-100155-90 135-70 1 30-401 10-20 I I silty clay I I I I I I I I I I I ' I loam, gravelly) I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 '12-26 ILoam, clay ICI., GC, SC JA-6 1 0 1 0-10 165-100160-100155-95 140-75 1 30-401 10-15 I I loam, gravellyl I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I 1 26-60 IVery gravelly IGM, GP, GP-GMIA-1 1 0 110-30 125-60 115-50 110-35 1 0-15 1 0-141 NP I I loamy sand. I I I I I I I I I I • 1 I very gravelly I I I I I I I I I I I I sand, I I I i• I I I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly sand I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BC: anvers---------1 0-4 ISilty clay loamlCL JA-6 1 0 1 0-5 195-100190-100180-100175-95 1 30-401 10-15 1 4-16 ISilty clay, ICH, CL JA-6, A-7 1 0 1 0-5 195-100190-100175-100165-90 1 35-SSI 15-30 I I clay loam, I I I I I I I I I I I I silty clay I I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 16-42 JC2ay loam, elarlCL JA-6. A-7 1 0 1 0 190-100165-100175-95 160-90 1 30-45r 10-25 1 42-60 1Gravelly clay 1GC. GC-GM, JA-2, A-4, A-61 0 1 0-5 160-SS 150-75 130-70 120-60 1 25-351 5-15 I I loam. very I SC. SC-SM. 1 I I I I I I I I I I gravelly eandyl CL I I I I I I I I I I I loam. I I I I I I I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly loam I I i I I I I I I I I I eagle----------1 0-6 ISilt loam 1CL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100175-85 1 25-301 5-10 1 6-9 ISilt loam JCL-ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 1 100 195-100180-90 1 25-301 5-10 1 9-60 ISilt loam JCL-ML. ML JA-4 1 0 1 0 1 100 195-100190-95 180-90 1 20-301 UP-10 I I I I I I I I I I i I • i. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF 5 CURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • ENGINEERING I.%DEX PROPERTIES inote -- ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES Ls report gives estimates of the engineering classification and of the range of index properties for the for layers of each soil in the survey area. Most soils have layers of contrasting properties within the upper )r 6 feet. ?TH to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. The range in depth and information on other )perties of each layer are given in the published Soil Survey for each soil aeries under *Soil Series and Their .phology." ,MW is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined :ording to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in imeter. •Loam.* for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 26 to So percent silt, and less than 52 :cent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is as much as about IS percent, an appropriate modifier is led, for example, "gravelly." Textural terms are defined in the Soil Survey Glossary. issification of the soils is determined according to the .Unified soil classification system and the system ipted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. UNIFIED system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are • .ssified according to grain-size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to .aticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils Sbiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML. AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven ups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of grain-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in up A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. If laboratory a are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A-1-a, A-1-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7- or A-7-6. As an additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group. ex number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. k FRAGMENTS larger than 3 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight is. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight tentage. tentage of soil particles passing designated sieves (PERCENTAGE PASSING SIEVE NUMBER--)is the percentage of the 1 fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40. and 200 (USA ndard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0'.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on oratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. UID LIMIT and PLASTICITY INDEX (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The imates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. The estimates • grain-eize distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index are generally rounded to the nearest 5 percent. Thus, the ranges of gradation and Atterberg limits extend a marginal amount (1 or 2 percentage points) across reification boundaries, the classification in the marginal zone is omitted in this report. DEPARTMENT OF AGR:C:.-T'JRE PAGE 1 OF 5 URD- RESOURCES CONSERNATION SERVICE 09/22/00 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS' Consultants itries under "Erosion factors--T" apply to the entire profile. Entries under "Wind erodibility group" and "Wind erodability index" apply only to the surface layer) (Erosion factorslWind (wind Map symbol I Depth I Clay I Moist I Perinea- IAvailablel Shrink- lorganicl Ierodi-lerodi ►nd soil name I I 1 bulk I bility I water I swell I matterl I I . Ibilitylbility 1 density I Icapacity 1potentiall I K I Kf I T (group lindex i i I I I I 1 I I I_I I 1 :n I Pct ► 9/cc I In/hr I In/in 1 Pct I I I I I I I I I I I j: I I I. I I I •. I I I I I osterdam-------1 0-8 ( 20-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.201Low 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 5 1 6 1 48 i 8-15 1 18-3011.20-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.17-0.201Low 11.0-2.01 0.431 0.431 1 1 1 15-42 1 18-2711.25-1.451 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.201Low 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 142-60 1 10-2011.2S-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.191Low 10.0-O.SI 0.431 0.431 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I a: Lac --------I 0-10 1 20-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 I0.18-0.201Low 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 5 I 6 148 1 10-19 27-3511.20-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.16-0.201Moderate 11.0-3.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 19-60 1 15-2511.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.201Low 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I IC: I I I I I I I I I I I I nsterdam-------I 0-8 120-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.201Low 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 5 1 6 1 48 1 8-15 1 18-3011.20-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.17-0.201Low 11.0-2.01 0.431 0.431 1 1 15-42 1 18-2711.25-1.451 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.201Low 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 I I 1 42-60 110-2011.25-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.191Low 10.0-0.51 0.431 0.431 1 1 I I I I i I I I I I I I eagle----------1 0-6 118-2511.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.201Low 11.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 5 I 4L 1 86 1 6-9 1 18-2511.15-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.191Low 11.0-2.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 9-60 1 10-1811.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.191Low 10.0-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 ?e: I I I I I I I I I I I I ]bar-----------1 0-22 1 18-2711.15-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.201Low 13.0-5.01 0.281 0.281 4 1 6 1 48 122-49 1 18-2711.35-1.551. 0.60-2.00 10.14-0.181Low 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 i 49-63 1 5-1811.50-1.701 2.00-6.00 10.04-0.051Low I --- 10.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I SA: I I I I I I I I I I I I xreeriv--------1 0-5 1 18-2711.1S-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.181Low 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 3 1 6 1 48 1 5-25 1 18-3511.25-1.451 0.20-0.60 10.14-0.1811,ow 11.0-3.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 25-63 j 0-1011.50-1.701 6.00-20.0010.02-0.051Low `.0.0-1.01 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I' I I I I I I ,n ------1 0-11 1 1S-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.221Low 14.0-8.01 0.281 0.281 3 1 6 1 48 1 11-21 1 18-3511.25-1.451 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.201Moderate 12.0-4.01 0.281 0.281 I 1 1 21-60 1 0-1011.50-1.701 6.00-20.0010.04-0.061Low 11.0-2.01 0.051 0.171 1 I DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 5 IRAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Contia;:ed Consultants (Erosion factorslWind (Wind lap symbol I Depth I Clay I Moist I Permea- IAvailablel Shrink- lOrganicl Ierodi-lerodi- id soil name I I I bulk I bility I water I swell I matterl I I Ibilitylbility. I I I density I Icapacity Ipotentiall I K i Kf I T (group lindex I I I I I I I I I i_I I I In I Pct 1 9/cc I In/hr I In/in 1. I Pct I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,ssberg-------1 0-15 1 20-2711.17-1.271 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.20ILow 14.0-6.01 0.321' 0.371 3 1 6 1 48 1 15-24 120-35I1.11-1.311 0.20-2.00 10.15=0.181Moderate 12.0-4.01 0.201 0.321 1 1 1 24-60 1 0-1011.50-1.701 6.00-20.0010.02-0.03ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.171 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I dowcreek-----1 0-11 1 18-25I1.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.20ILow 12.0-5.01 0.371 0.371 3 1 5 156 111-25 1 18-2511.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.13-0.15ILow 11.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 25-60 1 0-5 11.20-I.501 >20.00 10.02-0.03ILow 10.0-0.51 O.OSI 0.201 1 1 I I I t I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I gle----------1 0-6 1 18-25I1.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.201Low 1X.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 5 I 4L 1 86 1 6-9 1 18-25I1.15-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.19ILow 11.0-2.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 • 1 9-60 1 10-1811.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.191Low 10.0-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I dyk----------1 0-6 1 18-2211.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.191Low 11.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 5 1 41, 1 86 1 6-30 1 10-1811.15-1.35I 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.19ILow 10.5-2.01 0.371 0.371 1 ' 1 1 30-60 1 10-1811.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.181Low 10.0-0.51 0.371 0.371 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I ner----------1 0-6 1 15-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.19ILow 12.0-4.01 0.371 0.371 3 1 6 1 48 1 6-12 1 25-35I1.30-1.SOI 0.60-2.00 10.12-0.18IModerate 10.5-2.01 0.241 0.371 1 1 1 12-26 1 18-35I1.35-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.12-0.18IModerate 10.0-O.SI 0.241 0.371 1 1 1 26-60 1. 0-5 11.35-1.501 6.00-20.0010;01-0.061Low 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I • I I I I I I I I I I I I vers---------1 0-4 1 27-3511.15-1.35I 0.20-0.60 10.16-0.20IModerate 12.0-4.01 0.321 0.321 5 1 7 1 --- 1 4-16 1 35-5011.30-1.501 0.06-0.20 10.13-0.16IHigh 11.0-2.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 16-42 1 27-4511.30-1.SOI. 0.06-0.20 10.13-0.16IHigh 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 42-60 1 10-35I1.45-1.651 0.20-0.60 10.11-0.141Low 10.0-0.51 0.241 0.431 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lle----------1 0-6 1 18-2511.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.201Low 11.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 5 1 4L 1 86 1 6-9 -1 18-2511.15-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.191Low 11.0-2.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 9-60 1 10-1811.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.19ILow 10.0-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 I I I I I I i I I I_I I • C_r:_2TMENf OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 5 PAL SOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS :ote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS re=rt shows estimates of some characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates give. for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates are based on field observations on test data for these and similar soils. ' as'a soil separate consists of mineral. soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. ,his report, the estimated clay content of each major soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight,' of the material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The amount and kind of clay greatly affect the ility and physical condition of the soil. They determine the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and •etain moisture. They influence shrink-swell potential, permeability, plasticity, the ease of soil iersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and hmoving operations. ;T BULK DENSITY is the weight of soil (ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is 'ield moisture capacity, the moisture content at 1/3 bar moisture tension. Weight is determined after ng the soil at 105 degrees C. In this report, the estimated moist bulk density of each major soil zon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is less than 2-millimeters in' ier' Bulk density data are used to compute shrink-swell potential, available water capacity, total other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space available for r *and ots. A bulk density of more than 1.6 can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist density is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter, and soil structure. EABILITY refers to the ability of a soil to transmit water or air. The estimates indicate the of downward movement of water when the soil is saturated. They are based on soil characteristics rved in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Permeability is considered in design of soil drainage systems, septic tank absorption fields, and construction where the rate of r movement under saturated conditions affects behavior. LABLE WATER CAPACITY refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of storing for use by ts. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each major soil layer. capacity varies, depending on soil properties that affect the retention of water and the depth of the root The most important properties are the content of organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil cture. Available water capacity is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in resign and management of irrigation systems. Available water capacity is not an estimate of the quantity of r actually available to plants at any given time. AK-Sw5'LL POTENTIAL is the potential for volume change in a soil with a loss or gain of moisture. Volume 3e occurs mainly because of the interaction of clay minerals with water and varies with the amount and type lay minerals in the soil. The size of the load on the soil and the magnitude of the change in soil moisture :nt influence the amount of swelling of soils in place. Laboratory measurements of swelling of undisturbed 3 were made for many soils. For others, swelling was estimated on the basis of the kind and amount of minerals in the soil and on measurements of similar soils. If the shrink-swell potential is rated moderate ary high, shrinking and swelling can cause damage to buildings, roads, and other structures. Special design :tqeded. Shrink-swell potential classes are based on the change in length of an unconfined clod as itent is increased from air-dry to field capacity. The change is based on the soil fraction less 2 meters in diameter. The classes are "Low," a change of less than 3 percent; "Moderate," 3 to 6 ent; and "High," more than 6 percent. "Very high," greater than 9 percent, is sometimes used. S. DEPARTMENT CF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 5 PURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 • PHYSICAL PROPERTIES CF SOILS inote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued ;ANIC MATTER is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. In report J, e estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is 3s than 2 millimeters in diameter. 'The content of organic Tatter in a soil can be maintained or increased by :urning crop residue to the soil. Organic matter affects the available water capacity, infiltration rate, and lth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops. )SION FACTOR K indicates the susceptibility of the whole soil (including rocks and rock fragments) to :et and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in'the Universal Soil Loss.Equation (USLE) predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The :imates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter (up to 4 percent) and on soil .ucture and permeability. Values of K range from 0.05 to 0.69. The higher the value, the more susceptible soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. ISION FACTOR Kf is like EROSION FACTOR K but it is for the fine-earth fraction of the soil. Rocks and :k fragments are not considered. ISION FACTOR T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind or water that can • :ur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. D ERODIBILITY GROUPS are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting their resistance to wind ,sion in cultivated areas. The groups indicate the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion. Soils are grouped ording to the following distinctions: 1. Coarse sands, sands, fine sands, and very fine sands. These soils are generally not suitable for crops. They are extremely erodible, and vegetation is difficult to establish. 2. Loamy coarse sands, loamy sands, loamy fine sands, loamy very fine sands, and sapric soil material. These soils are very highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 3. Coarse sandy loans, sandy loams, fine sandy loams, and very fine sandy loams. These soils are highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 4L. Calcareous loans, silt loams, clay loans, and silty clay loams. These soils are erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 4. Clays, silty clays, noncalcareous clay loams, and silty • clay.loams that are more than 35 percent clay. These soils are moderately erodible. Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used. ;. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF 5 .'UR1 TtESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 09/22/00 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS '.note -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued S. Noncalcareous loans and silt loans that are less than 20 percent clay and sandy clay loams, sandy clays, and heroic soil material. These soils are slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used. 6. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are more than 20 percent clay and noncalcareous clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay. These soils are very slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if ordinary measures to control wind erosion are used. 7. Silts, noncalcareous silty clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay, and fibric soil material. These soils are very. slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if ordinary measures to control wind erosion are used. Soils that are not subject to wind erosion because of e fragments on the surface or because of surface , ess. WIND ERODIBILITY INDEX is used in the wind erosion equation (WEQ). The index number indicates the mt of soil lost in tons per acre per year. The range of wind erodibility index numbers is 0 to 300. Project: Baxter/Davis Development Worksheet 2 • Client: Williams Brothers Date Created: 9/18/2000 Static Water Level Readings .�.. (all measurements in feet) r Well ID 5/31 8/31 9/15 9/29 10/17 MW-4 5.2 4.1 dry dry dry MW-5 6.4 dry dry dry d MW-7 9.5 dry dry dry' dry MW 8 7.0 6.1 dry dry dry MW-11 6.4 6.4 5.95 5.75 5.60 MW-12 8.0 7.2 6.83 6.83 6.93 MW-22 4.3 2.3 1.27 0.92 0.80 MW-24 4.3 4.3 . 3.80 3.59 3.19 M W 25 3.8 3.7 2.78 2.42 2.12 MW 27 3.8 1.6 1.10 0.70 0.13 MW-28 3.8 4.2 0.58 3.43 2.73 MW-30 4.6 4.2 3.93 3.63 3.38 MW 31 8.3 7.1 dry dry dry MW-32 5.0 4.7 dry 4.05 3.69 • M W-33 4.0 2.5 2.24 2.11 1.71 M W-34 4.5 2.7 2.49 2.07 1.59 MW-35 8.3 7.2 7.45 7.36 7.17 M W-36 8.1 8.3 dry dry dry PZ-1 3 dry dry dry PZ-1 (7) 4.30 3.87 4.84 PZ-1 10 3.60 3.20 4.82 PZ-2 3 dry' dry dry PZ-2 3.80 3.57 3.31 PZ-2 (101 3.90 3.60 3.32 PZ-3 3 dry dry dry P2-3 5.31 5.76 3.55 PZ-3 (101. 5.31 5.76 3.53 J7.LIAMS BROTHERS — — — — '� J E 1/4 w.S•e 34 1 T. 2 S., R. 5 £. � f, ' /4 OF SEC. 3, I I 1 ' ii. 2 OF SEC. 34, T. 1 S., R. 5 £. � �1/2. N1Y 1/�I, Sb }/4 `S'/ ♦ �, �l � r ; `i�yt ,ALLAT/N COUNTY, MONTANA 1 cos No. :» ,� n+♦11 �`�, MOVIE!` � i vRN t I CLUDED ♦ ' gale 1_ A'1 RN i I \ Not MaUo[0 `ia� TM f a �., _ Q`ip �6 1 v or ROW 1 9/6/00 I I � �� '•' rL,,�,� I I �� '� i a A aan,� om ` } Soh �` rH♦fs-�� txun4 eC sae iegat.r lral—I p-- �iAn�ARo-same eta) \ ' � Y• o Its nl♦sae i 11 Sw 1/4. SEC. 34 PARCEL II ' \ TIA! TM♦fie �1 0 n TN /to fi ' N6fi1.a �� f ♦ ` OEi T a . • R'i l `. n,♦gas S/El /4, SEC. 34 IN 1eA • 7 tiGE4. r a d� 4 \ I I 0 e%jCEL I 'a I 1 0 36-322 1.6-206 ' . 'I —S•l�Sere4 A-- -- ,=_=--- m-- — — /-0/NPL7fA - — — Wb9}a fia.�i' ter Lane_ sEw.5ae341 —_--__ T.I «•Car.See -------- —! ��.-..-: s� arsrr---=,—_---.--- — 7/n ca�.a T—— ,4-o2LLalts•ma—a[wl 1—Ir t/••�.s:e 1 eta � o vow+ — — li 6.�"a �ENr-——— t:: ►M S/e•Rmar,ne ram, I ; NOnSC 1, , M a1f L 1 T 31 '1 E"A' nil TH♦ha �. LEGEND I n I '� o � TM �' INDICATES 'MST HOLE LOCATION •-S�' ` 41 AND ELEVATION `� I . u CULWN C � TN♦Na r.S PART of ` • TV INDICATES MONITOR WELL LOCATION 11• �, p� PARCEL II is asdn AND ELEYAnoN �, I sF-N. �� NE 1/4, SEC. 3 ,,� a •`.6.°�>>' DEPRESSIONAL WETLAND r------I d ,,,,,, .''S RIVEAINE WETLAND I ): TH♦/ae ny}ro.E' .-: F•t r I n+♦Na 11 • ► 600 r�}lt.� r'r7 �» 1 23P-71 TN♦1la CuLwAr 0 r:• rs24 • TN fa• ��, ♦. 34 '11VG dull) yrsl.S• ;� i TWU / 'INVG, INC. �°` .-s „4�cil z j — _ 4L74•,,,� C1lkA1`— •r..a�rvW C1/•Ca.3ie3 =----- — -- -----=` __� _— -- CUtKAt3 Y®taea 69710 0/M II`I AM, �'" E L/4 Ga.Sr- rit19Ua�1a011.AA Sheet 1 of 1 UI /(t ' 1 foa00e.2( • �t�t4a. �Y'i�10� C L, OCT-02-0© 08 :83 q�YEL.L OWSTONERESOURCE E61 105 P. 01 TEST PIT DATA FOR PIEZOMETERS W 1LUAM BROS. DAVis LANE PROJECT SEPTEMBER 6,2000 PZ43 Located in grain field at southern end of land. In area where southern pond will 0—1.9'-Clay loam with some gravel to oobble size clasts,dusky yellowish brown, semi- deformable, slightly sticky, clear change to next horizon. 1.9'to TD(--9')-GraveUy muddy sand,brownish black, poorly sorted,no sedimentary structure. Grains appear to be sub-rounded to rounded. Water level.appears to be at about three feet. PZ#2 Located in field where Zoot pond will be located on east side of property north of Baxter Lane. 0' —2.8'-Clay loam, dusky yellowish brown,subangular blocky peels, slightly sticky, semi-deformable,with a gradual change to the next horizon. 2.8'4.0'-Sandy mud(Folk),motUed'pale brown with some darker brown clasts,no sedimentary structures,appears to be moderately sorted. Some gravel sine inclusions. 4.0' —TD(-9')-Muddy sandy gravel with cobble size inclusions. Olive black, sub- rounded to rounded. Poorly sorted. Water level appears to be at about tour feet. • PZ#1 Located in alfalfa held east of road into the dairy farm. 0' —3.0'-Clay loam,brownish black, subangular to granular peds, slightly sticky, semi- deformable,with a clear change to the next horizon. 3.0'—S.2% Sandy trend(Folk), mottled pale yellowish brown with some darker brown clasts,no sedimentary strucmres, appears to be moderately sorted. Some gravel size inclusions. 5.2'—TD(-A;S')-Muddy sandy gravel with cobble size inclusions. Olive black, sub- rounded to rounded. Poorly sorted. Water*ve -aCnbd 6:6:feet: • Memo To: Gary Swanson,PE.,Peccia&Assoc. From: Lynn Bacon,Wetland Specialist HDS EST,INC.. Date: August 23,2001 Re: Williams Brothers Subdivision—Groundwater Information Enclosed is the Williams Brothers Static Water Level Readings spreadsheet. The readings . were conducted monthly from May 31,2000 until August 22,2001. On August 22, static water levels(SWL)decreased in all wells except well#33 since the last measurements were taken on July 24,2001. In general,water levels decreased 0.1 to 1.6 feet since the last reading. The water level in well#33 increased 1 foot. The casing depth in wells 4, 5, 8, 31, and 32 are known to be less than 6 feet deep and should be reinstalled if more measurements are required. Wells 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12,31, 32, 36,and all of the 3 foot piezometer casings,were dry. The wells in the general area of the proposed pond(SWNE Section 3)indicate that ground water levels are less than 5 feet from the ground surface. Current ground water levels in these wells • are summarized in the following table. Static water levels in the area of the prmoposed and SWNE Section 3 . West Side Baxter- Border ditch East Side Baxter- Border ditch Well# SWL Well# SWL 33 3.3 24 3.6 34 3.3 25 3.6 27 2.1 PZ-3 Q ft casing) 4.1 PZ-3 10 ft casing) 5.2 Measured in fed below ground surface. The August measuring event ends one full year of monitoring efforts for all wells and nested piezometers. We will send this to John Miles and Jerry Williams for their review and input regarding the necessity of future monitoring from these wells. Please contact us at 582-1992 with questions or if we may provide you with any additional information. Enc.: Static water levels measurements through 8/22/01;Map of well locations Cc: John Miles,Jerry Williams. • ROMEO F:/clients/191/823welidataP&A.doc AUG 2 7 2001 ROBERT PECCIA Project: Baxter Meadows Client: Williams Brothers Date Spreadsheet Created: 3/8101 Static Water Level Readings(ft) d (All measurements are in feet measured below ground surface.) rr.mc . ell ID TOCto 6131100 8131/00 9115100 9129100 10/17/00 11/3100 11/22/00 12/21/00• 1/30101 2/28101 3/22101 r I GS 11 MW-4 0.00 5.2 4.1 dry dry dry dry dry dry dry buried 0.50 • MW-5 0.70 6.4 dry dry dry dry dry dry dry frozen cap frozen cap 4.20 MW-7 0.80 9.5 dry dry dry dry dry dry dry dry dry 8.25 MW-8 0.00 7.0 6.1 dry dry dry dry dry dry buried buried dry MW-11 3.70 6.4 6.4 5.95 5.75 5.60 5.43 5.43 5.33 5.58 5.53 3.73 MW-12 1.88 8.0 7.2 6.83 6.83 6.93 7.13 7.33 dry/frozen dry dry 6.48 MW-22 0.00 4.3 2.3 1.27 0.92 0.80 0.55 0.75 0.95 0.95 buried 0.00 MW-24 2.20 4.3 4.3 3.80 3.59 3.19 3.44 3.64 3.74 3.89 3.94 1.99 MW-25 0.00 3.8 3.7 2.78 2.42 2.12 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 buried 1.10 MW-27 0.00 3.8 1.6 1.10 0.70 0.13 0.15 0.30 frozen frozen buried 0.00 MW-28 3.10 3.8 4.2 0.58 3.43 2.73 2.63 2.83 2.83 2.93 2.93 1.08 MW-30 0.00 4.6 4.2 3.93 3.63 3.38 3.30 3.30 snow plug snow plug snow plug 3.10 MW-31 0.00 8.3 7.1 dry dry dry dry dry dry buried buried 4.90 MW-32 0.00 5.0 4.7 dry 4.05 3.69 3.50 3.60 buried buried buried 1.87 MW-33 0.00 4.0 2.5 2.24 2.11 1.71 1.58 1.68 1.88 2.03 frozen @ 3' 0.03 MW-34 0.00 4.5 2.7 2.49 2.07 1.59 1.50 1.50 buried buried buried 0.00 MW-35 1.50 8.3 7.2 7.45 7.36 7.17 7.02 6.87 6.92 7.87 dry 6.32 MW-36 0.00 8.1 8.3 dry dry I dry dry dry snow plug dry dry 7.53 PZ-1 (T) 0.00 dry dry dry dry dry snow plug buried buried snow plug PZ-1(T) 0.00 4.30 3.87 4.84 4.80 4.80 snow plug buried buried snow plug PZ-1 (10') 0.00 3.60 3.20 4.82 4.80 4.80 7.80 buried buried 3.25 PZ-2(3') 0.80 dry dry dry dry dry snow plug snow plug snow plug snow plug PZ-2(T) 0.80 3.80 3.57 3.31 3.20 3.20 snow plug snow plug snow plug snow plug PZ-2(10') 0.80 3.90 3.60 3.32 3.20 3.20 snow plug snow plug snow plug snow plug PZ-3(T 0.79 dry dry dry dry dry snow plug I snow plug I snow plug I snow plug PZ-3(T) 0.79 5.31 5.76 3.55 3.81 3.71 3.61 snow plug snow plug 3.41 PZ-3(IV) 0.79 5.31 5.76 3.53 3.51 3.61 snow plug snow plug snow plug snow plug Snow plug:snow blown into the well casing forming a plug that cannot be penetrated with the water meter probe; Dry:probe was lowered to the bottom of the well with no water detected; Frozen cap:cap of well frozen onto pipe and measurement unobtainable; Frozen:water frozen; Not found:well location obscured by tall grass and measurement unobtainable; Buried:well has been filled in with rocks and soil due to cattle activity. NOTES 8/22 4124101 5/23101 712/01 ell ID TOC to 7124101 8/22/01 BOTTOM OF GS WELL AT: 2.20 dry dry MW-4 0.00 buried dry 2.9' 4.80 dry dry MW-5 0.70 dry dry 6' 8.30 dry 5.60 MW-7 0.80 not found dry dry dry dry MW-8 0.00 dry dry 4' 5.03 2.73 5.00 MW-11 3.70 dry dry 9.1 • 7.23 4.13 6.40 MW-12 1.88 dry dry 9.2 1.10 1.00 1.90 MW-22 0.00 not found 2.70 3.54 6.50 3.94 MW-24 2.20 5.10 4.80 2.30 2.90 2.20 MW-25 0.00 3.20 3.60 0.00 1.10 1.10 MW-27 0.00 2.50 2.10 2.53 3.63 4.20 MW-28 3.10 1 5.20 5.00 2.70 4.00 3.30 MW-30 0.00 3.60 4.40 5.50 dry 5.30 MW-31 0.00 dry dry. <2' 3.40 4.30 4.90 MW-32 0.00 dry dry 4.1 1.33 2.23 4.30 MW-33 0.00 buried 3.30 1.10 3.90 1.90 MW-34 1 0.00 2.60 3.30 5.92 6.42 6.00 MW-35 1.50 6.30 7.10 7.30 4.40 dry MW-36 0.00 dry dry 7.5 dry dry dry PZ-1 (3) 0.00 dry dry broken,level taken from estimated GS level 7.25 4.60 4.10 PZ-1 (7') 0.00 4.50 5.20 " 7.35 4.80 4.10 PZ-1(10') 0.00 5.10 5.70 " dry dry dry PZ-2(3) 0.80 not found dry 2.50 2.70 3.20 PZ-2(T) 0.80 not found 4.30 2.40 3.20 3.70 PZ-2(10') 0.80 not found 4.90 dry dry dry PZ-3(T) 0.79 not found dry 3.21 3.51 3.80 PZ-3(T) 0.79 not found 4.11 3.41 4.21 4.10 PZ-3(10') 0.79 not found 5.21 p1gel/2 pa9e2/2 page ref:clients/191 Mrellmon/Mwdatal/SW L.xls //fly T HOLE. LtC 7 AT C�NM AC JLE COPY _ OT o1 E 1/4 Cor.Sec 34 WILLIAMS BR f HERS ' — — — — -- — -� ,•.�aoyf-- y" 7 I • LOCATED IN THE NE .1/4 OF SEC. 3, T. 2 S, R. 5 '"— � AND !N THE S 1/2 OF SEC. 34, T. 1 S., R. 5 E. i i�1 1/2, NW 1/4, S t �':1/ 10 TH2 �. I W-1 T I COS NO..233 TH \ 1 / OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA i i ` PRIVATE PROPERTY I \ NOT INCLUDED : JK 0,3<p,�}' R��14n � I--E,dethy ed ride Right of Way r I I for Ccmty Road rH #9 . W-8 .l x6note IocoUonditch �n t1 far ExISUD Rwide ood Right of Woy.-..1 .- �r 0-BORDER DITCH} 1 . 51 I w -_ ' I OLD C- 1 RurRo Y 'd . :. TH�JB I j 1 b . 0 , SW 1/4, :fFC. 3 d 1 PARCEL III; r '► r. d�v art 1 T'dio \ # t all _ 1 f ,}, 35 SE 11/4, cEC. 34 I4 d CLUVATFD I 1 � �1 PARCEL-] /7 9_ Z f' ) tr3e-3=1 148-206—I _ _ o(ts e?ox>;t_ — _.— — — 1` _Cl t2r �_�Lne_—sE cor.set J __ —— S. fr _-J1iACC. �' '• - _r� _ ;- -� --:r._ y .�_'_�-!T• T.Z s. 4;'Q.r. ec� ------'-j r'�i . .e•c .: i •'•.v':`.�15-kT(7•(-�:: 't t -ii T j=Zs. Sew r��• '1`1 MLMU Di lbi G a Fclicm 1\T Fnd 5/S' Rebor. no_,. `�� !^`^'z, 1 i / %% CUL\VT TW f-v 30` \ 20 TM�31 ' YI `` VrW FED W-5 N\4"' ►tom �1 \ ( 1Q LEGEND S A 1 S 1 W- r� 21 TH 29 /� TW' INDICATES TEST HOLE LOCATION w'• '�' ` W-5� 1 � 1 *M FnD WVLYERT PART OF,' TW INDICATES MONITOR WELE LOCATION II� PARCEL 11 �P-1 11 NE 1/4, 'AFC W JL!! DEPRESSIONAL WETLAND 'I '.i 5� I22 1V-4 I W-5 TH 2d `� 5 M-2 W i------� RIVERINE WETLAND i $0 �` HAJM NO Scale. In Feed ,1 1 i 2) \Il TH 23 ' TH 12 600 .0 . 600 wvv_ ►h ;� 1. 9/ cuUm 180 0 180 W-s Scale In Meters #24 I rho 1� .. � TH�34 t • . , - 1 I yv 1 • R1VGNBRRRvG AND -- -- SURVEsYING, VVC: �-I 4a74,E _ •arA •rho•straDt+.r�1 •[+si Jta.gtnt C 1/•4 Cor.Sea.3 ------ D P07iER - --- - ' /1 l�i�' 83011 - E1/4 Car.Sao.3 U15 Test 1[atn Street.SntU I Bozeman.VonUu 59715 I 40e 5E7-111e•F= 4011 5" Sheet 1 of 1 �I 0009.2 TH ,.:fy ,�-:!. •o�X��=:. :�• •:{. '=' •'�.tF:•= - �ti'% "` •:=�i_ �••^i�'v�'•'.a'.i::_��x��-• ..�^i:•.?:•r:�yam`i;!::.�a. f r ��:�,ua�i - - '�.F r;� 'F>�'• `�- .•r:'7 s>• ,d,�4 r.Y+i'^.i.�• i i r{ �J •':'��Y;�..� ''��- ':r�'�h% :1_'a`, •,-�, •f�'.•7}+����t:r y�nrsr.- 4r�..� .:��i+� •c.- a�::.~T�`. � 1.?� �y f+r ..7_. .:t•i` � <.. :f. �•':• 7 "h�•ir.: .�y _ .R..a `�;> .:>:->.S- t`x+i.:i •ys'>' r. • 7.7�-�.?..y,t _ _�7-'L'.� :.5-r"•." k.:y'• 'lJ.:...r.3X.A�7ts:5..— F;��:-. �F':... r,v;; '>.-a....• ' >:�� - : •1r i' may' '•wyyy .lv: ;I•f.2\•>•0 T�/�J1y�,� J•�>: \\i �.�\-Y+Y.�•fii���•.r'' '4lr^ M.�>1.. \ _'+1„w`• ..ti.A ,• .ate=.:'� �•.J'�.1� ,:_: •:..•.'?.f7n�•- ::`'� .,K'.� '"' - �.'�'c+.1`�'_'.`� v"i �.(; !'•r+a1 ••j �``- ,:;`w ;�' :.t• _cr:•,,•Y•._`r:a•c::•. '•��fF.,'_y :.' f :•�.vZ.r� 'yt�•,'.'a. 'A�' �Y•�i�t,e,- •1•s'•i�•� ,,�l��r>:�:.:': -.ti•.�Y-:.`..• .r L' 4 S:•:'•: _ ,�{y�-��N'Fy..0 Y �, ••4; C. �.Jf �: • � i..;'�.�,'. - > I r_y7 ..:?'n• p> _ •y;,i.ii�l �'. �•' ••J:4 ��'��:•':.ir;'r, .'�f•.�j,�.yv'?, r ;�.. R'.-�_' ��:.=�,�^`fir,_• r•.•, :::r^^.i�'�-... •.�'%L:ft�. a;� •�S.t�••'?i-'`. ..�j;;-�:::� _'�`•Y''=` '• r'- -A�;` v.•••��' F- �J>.�>.,� sA `•�•Q 7 .=i�.tci•Yt:�a^S••`.�: S a=e.y��• ter•>�s Y:� r wy.^, �,�-f ;)''�^� '�-=`.::.���: •'!:.�}-�c�'�:,�.�'... f•`j• fK`"+ LiJ.t a n:s,a�. =i :j:c `V:.•.`•. '3.•.='•.' , 'i .47 441 ! ;, w�•• _ r.``�-�� •=,._X��,. ,i• `^jr,`•,",�..y.�:q::4� '�' �l':�•'�: 1- � , � l -:J•: � "i,•�J -:i•1..�•1f�,�.eR7\{,..>,�'•:r �• _ > a' •�../�L: r.:A ••'.'s y `N J'��I':�vS�-.^��'•�•�'� ewr`M`tle- .,v� w war"i.,. _•.:r:.� '?•wJir-:' •c'::�. Leyrw�:-2 •.•i..in�;.a>:t� .:Y 1�,•:_7...yy5''.^•>is.iG:F.� .;.< -- _, '•f'.b' ..,• �'.::'. •.. ..3• <7f�::�.::' c•�••.^�,a L,C.>.y _ _ :�(?:�:>-_,• '���.. 11' i� '',�••K:f' fry „•hr A Jw�'.•C'•:y �L• .' Wy `'y�J .CY�-:♦.)h..i'•'� ..'i: r>� •': �•'�'=t:::r �:•:•:•��•:'�i�'7'jx`Z'?Sr:'. _ �r a'�:0l•.:4�..-' . •-�a�:T: ` • Lr•' �1'ems�,i`'• ' `..&...•r Z;rJ,'... :<._..'o-�• .A,h •c.,•':,.;'..r:•:C: - � :S .�:. ..�C'.aF^Mr•.- .qy�r. ,CL.�. k+9! r•', :• •+. .tf:•r••.:•r.��{}•2...�:>.. ..:,� •�• .at•Y.. ?: M�1'�'...-.t•'�' 7�:�f�,'.:.. >,%..•7`': is.::,7 w_ i>t 's'7-• •�;.: �" ):R.^.? •�f '•�!y::}�"�V}. c`Y • . ':�• ,;....t i'.;yr�• ,r},r4':�::Q„�,. S.V �:,<��:1„ fC' r"..i •': �:�' i•tn:,:s���a r,�?.< •..4.��;Jk��,:�+�;: � �-'�V J✓T'•i'J.:, ;v. •'' ';.1; •t,.,.$,'-,•. '` �'3>• "1''•'as'.y-�'1c�>>^y�•`. .a. `�-:-%S.'`wt •� Sj^`kls•.r• e�y F. ♦.SC..• - ice`. qL i "'t • '' '.•� r •fie>>;M;.,-;.:-Fes►S;��,.r•;�;:`r.�': '' �''•7'^'.'.,=oy =- V: � Z��� . �,�'S�p' �_a - .KTJI_•.••�'>j '-b-'tG�'<:�'�e'� 6Z.�,�^•`:' :.li> U �•> :C'Rti �thi�...^ry_'>•.�':i.f•.`w�r �... _ :�•` rt'l.;j.,r�i. �•-t.7-•��-�•..y'.3`•.�....e:.: �"i1TY o.:T�'7�;;4>�.r�`•'rl,.},��.•7� � .'^"_` r:.r•,'�"_ w.;, . ' .> <n•-•��!:•:'r,.-' i.R. l4: ?>R:-.Y �' :A�:r�c�„�: ...ate. �'`.�'e� -..,P. ��._ �_t•.:. )�^(�. �A T�•j��-`'ram S• Y4-•'tom!•,•' us ~y'T--�ry.'42 :� •�, �••`�,r 4� 1 -s F ".:f^., t:' =k ?r•, K?F.`' - �R ; ti••. y: r7Tr�'` r.: t � .aSr'-V• , ._12t��•�.1�4w^f�.I.••-� :��•K.YY.:.t;t;� a.. �":�, y. - 'i . .A e' 'n;•'?'t'C•.,:r.� t it ,•-^'�i ± $ "F :�:w�',[„ ;�i''r,.�,?ta�`•�ry'rs:ir.••<L-�lt.'7-'7•: x 3':'a��, __ •,� ' �- �• l'`}I � "-Tye":'i'•t': %^�••`,_••'''`x-' .:•> � • t�. _ .�_�9% r•.•raw S.;l'..::... a�:' _. �• - gy� .rs_ •''x i' ' 'a�3'f`,L%•`A- �,Z••_:�`." _ x r l•y •�'> I'� � �.,,t q„ �Jj f Pam' .! •-_I_+c��,C. .: �..-.- -- •- - �. ti� y., _ - - :iti•�y w-'+.•,.b�t../'•7.^��d'r4->�4,. 3�•w.��.. •�7. i q+_ '•• :�r _ ,)�r,Yi ic,� ?�E..re3,,,.;.•�_ 4 C r r r, qL'ti>;of�� '+�R!_••Ln._. •e., t '�c. r\. .;�• ' -r ->T. .I .:.✓' Y'-r , .'3• _'+, •. _ .-!'+i_'2 ir".`'�'•-a"i+v .�'a'M •�- ¢•�:��,�;a�� ;�.,� w^: - �.. _ �:vr'�L.r}`r - -� :_'�.�'•,�>��'f>i:s> •:.3°e. i•:. `.��� f s :?j: a . '� _ Ir• T= ti• tea. •:i .:r ^F'T� r� •'w•1'C�•.•••�,- . .._S"J. �a.�4 •_ '-�t�t•+yo-y�•1 •ti' i.. :'��• 'S .. - - s°,��'' 'Zs':: '�-'• .yam- ' �•3�•�:'-3:.- ,.-.of ry'. •fi.�;/-h• -� �:� � jsT•�• - �f_w �'�... �•, � �1_ :_i ar�-.-r _ '•�f. _ MCP•�y,a .:<�.,Se..�. ,. _ _!iG• ;si. r ..�' .:�. ':�„r• Vie,_ _ •� /..�t ::(.• _ .<�.. y!_c ••1 ;''.c �•-�: i-^'-i •-- cf1•.iiy,.•• - ••',:i-_: .,Y:_" �a ••5• � � ;:: fin+ R � � ;M ♦. -. �1 �='.^ ,^,� :''� •=r :. : �. '•Sa,• i - :y5� �•:.�rl_' ' �f� {'.'���• va'a • �%� i-.F 'K�e.:�: �x`•r�'•^•�a,"••- - :�•iF.•: .' dt: • � - I,n Y2 ! _ - li �r ,fy`_ j -i Yr:.. - 1•r 1,�..-,Y:L• ! .��: ••�'a Y ::ti`z i.•.u' �`i,�y .,K�•• �-��'.•'•'!.-'>•.T..}ea' � '1�'�`'��rr. :.:�'`:'+ �•p' .� •' •,�y:_f. .. •y-';;�,:r?.: .1,,•..,• •' •�1F;;v,� •• ••�."�.�'�'i.�::;�'.s ��:T. $5�;►�-�i.�''i `-.:6::•. ta'.�;. ... .�s`... 1 - •;'�. - •• .�he••�.,_3.'L%y S R- �r�.'r"yo�.tvj a� �`. a.`.1: .ti, 'q'J:�;^' ♦3 4..•�` OTd WHSt?:TT T00Z 61 •400 666TZBS9017 'ON XUA y ONIIS3MSUNU- 13M WQ2� OCT-16-01 09 :06 FROM=ROBERT PECCI'A&ASSOC . _ ID14064475036 PAGE 2/31 Appendix C - Weed Management WEED CONTROL PLAN • Williams Brothers Baxter Meadows Site Development Gallatin County`iontana Williams Brothers Construction Inc.hereby submits this Weed Control Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Board as required by the Montana County Noxious Weed Llanagement:act_Rule 7-22-2121,New Section C(3)(a)states,"The person or agency disturbing the land'shall submit to the board a written plan specifying the methods to be used to accomplish revegetation. The plan must describe the time and method of seeding,fertilization practices,recommended plant species,use of weed-free seed,and weed management procedures to be used." The attached sections of the project bid package cover most of the above requirements under the following sections: • RPA Supplementary Conditions, 10. Wccd Control; • Technical Specification;Subsection 02/930,Coversoil; • Technical Specification,Subsection 02I931,Fertilize and Seeding; Technical Specification,Subsection 02/932,Mulch; Upon completion of the Baxter Meadows Site Development.Project,Williams Brothers Construction will continue to monitor the site after construction and growth of noxious weeds. If any noxious weeds listed by the Gallatin County Weed District appear on the project sitc`the County Need Board will.be notified'immediately. The most effective method of control will be implemented according to the District's.noxious weed proo am. Williams Brothers Construction assumes responsibility for weed control on the sites dunn- construction and for one year after the date of revedetation completion. After one year,the weed control responsibility reverts to the deeded landowner. The.Weed Control Plan for the Williams Brothers Baxter IVleadovvs Site Development-project is officially • approded and-in effect until one year after the completion of the construction when executed by the following officials: (Signature) Date (Title) Williams Brothers Construction,Inc. (Signature) Date - (Title) Gallatin County Weed Control Board r:�w grEltttvII�.��t s�,�wtgpi�`g.wln OCT-19-01 09 :06 FROM: ERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID : 447S036 PAGE 3/3.1 RPA SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS The intent of this Section is to supplement the conditions outlined in the Standard General Conditions.. CONTENTS L Insurance - 2. Bonding ( . . 3. Bid Security 4. Withdrawl of Bids 5. Method of Award 6. Performance,Labor and Material laymen[Bonds and Insurance 7. Montana Contractors Taz _ 8. Payrolls and Basic Records %9- 1 Governing Standards and Regulatory'Requirements 10. Weed Control 11. `Contractor Reimbursed Engineering Costs 12. Construction Progress 13. Repair and Replacement Quality 14. Rejected Work • 15. Traffic Control 16. Contract Document Discrepancies 17. Project Closeout 18. Warranty 1. INSURANCE Without limiting any of the other obligations or liabilities of the Contractor,Contractor shall secure andmaintain such insurance from an insurance company(or companies)authorized to write insurance in the State of Montana,with minimum"A.M.Best Rating"of B+,VI,as will protect himself,his subcontractors,the Owner and the Engineer and their respective agents and employees from claims for bodily injury, death or property damage which may arise from operations and completed operations under this Agreement. Such coverage shall be written for claims arising out of all premises/operations, subcontracted operations, products/completed operations, and all liability assumed by the Contractor under our contract or agreement. The general aggregate limit underthe limits of insurance applies separately to each of the"locations" owned by or rented by the Contractor. "Location"means premises involving the same or connecting lots,or premises whose connection is interrupted only by a street,roadway,waterway or right-of-way of a railroad.Contractor shall not commence work underthi s Agreement until such insurance has been SUPPLEMENTARY CO'_VDMONTS Page 1 OCT-16-01 OS: 06 FROM:ROBERT PE%PIA&ASSOC . ID:4064475036 PACE 4/31 obtained and certificates of insurance,with binders,orcertified copies of the insurance policy have • been filed with the Owner and the Engineer. All insurance coverages shall remain in effect throughout the life of the Agreement,except that the Contractor shall maintain the Commercial General Liability coverage for aperiod of at least one year followingthe substantial completion date for property damage resulting from occurrence during the agreement period. In addition,the Contractor shall obtain and pay the entire premium for Owners Protective Liability Coverage to protect the Owner and Engineer for their liability arising under this Agreement: Each insurance policy shall contain a clause providing that it will not be canceled by the Insurance Company without 45 days written notice to the Owner and Engineer of intention to cancel. The minimum amounts of such insurance coverages being as follows: Commercial General Liability A. Bodily Iniury&PropeM.._Damage $1.000.000. $3.000,000. Each Occurrence In Aggregate Coverage to Include: 1. Premises Operations.- • 2. Products Completed Operations. 3. Contractual. 4. Operations of Independent Contractors. S. Personal Injury_ 6. Property Damage applicable to Blasting,Collapse;and Underground Hazards. Maybe'satisfiedbyprimaryinsuranceoracombinationof-primary and excess or umbrella insurance Deductible not to exceed$5,000 per occurrence on properly damage. B_ Automobi)e Liability S2.000.000. Each Accident Bodily Injury and Property.Damage: Coverage to include: 1. All Owned. • SUPPLEMENTARY CONDMONS Page 2 OCT-19-01 09: 07 FROM:R BERT. PECC I A$RB50C . I D j644 75.036 PAGE 5/31 2. Hired. .' 3. Non-Owned. C. Workers'Comnensation Statutory $100.000. Each Accident Coverage to include: 1. Occupational Disease 2. Employer's Liability Section B-and C above maybe satisfied bypnimary insurance or a combination ofprimary an d excess . or umbrella insurance. The total aggregate limit shall not be less than$2,100,000. D_ Owners and Contractors Protective Liability Bodily Injury&.PropertyDamage: S I.000.000. $1.000.000. . Each Occurrence Aggregate E. Builder's Risk i Contractor shall purchase Builder's Risk on,the "All Risk" form of coverage.inclusive.of Fire, Extended Coverages,and Vandalism. Insurance shall include the interest of Contractor,the Owner, Engineer, and subcontractors. All parties agree to waive their rights of subrogation against one another with respect to losses covered'by the Builder's Risk policy. F. Additional Insured TheCon*t=tor's insurance coverage shall name the Town of Clyde Park,Robert Peccia&Associates, andBowIdsFamily(landowners)each asaY dditional Insured under Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability,a>7d Excess(or Umbrella)policies and Builders Risk. 2- BONDING In addition to all bonding requirements indicated in Article -5 of the General Conditions, all Contractors shall be responsible for meeting the Montana Workers Surety Bond Requirements, Sections 39-3-701 through 39-3-703 and MCA 18-2-201. SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS Page 3 OCT-le-01 09 :07 FROM:ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID-406447S036 PACE 6/31 3. BID SECURITY • TheBidmustbeaccom aliiedb aBidSecuri which 10 ercentoftheamount P Y tY P of the bid.At the option of the Bidder,the security may be in the form of a cashier's check,certified check,bank money order,or bank draft drawn and issued by a national banking association located in the.State..of Montana or by any banking corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Montana orbidbond or bonds executed by a surety corporation authorized to do business in the State of Montana. No bid will be considered unless it is accompanied by the required guaranty. Cashier's checks,certified checks,bank money orders,or bank drafts must be made payable to the Town of Clyde Park_ The Bid Security shall insure the execution of the Agreement and the furnishing of the. surety bond or bonds by the successful Bidder,all as required by the Contract Documents. Should the Bidder fail to famish the properly executed Performance Bond,Labor andMateri al Bond,: Insurance Certificatesi.and signed Agreetiieht;within the time specified,he/she shall forfeit this Bid Security to the Owner. The Bid Security(negotiable instruments other than bonds)will be returned to unsuccessful Bidders-when the successful Bidder has signed the Agreement-and furnished satisfa+ctoryPerformance and Labor and Material Bonds and InsuranceCeitificates.Bid security with bids that are not:competitive may be returned prior to signature of the Agreement' Revised Bids submitted before the opening of bids, if representing an increase in the original bid,. must have the Bid Security adjusted accordingly;otherwise,the bid will not be accepted. If the Bidder elects to furnish a Bid Bond,he shall use-the Bid Bond.foi ni bound herewith;or one • eotr€oiriniilgsubstantially thereto in form and content. 4. WITHDRAWL OF BIDS Bids maybe withdrawn at anytime prior.to the scheduled closing time for the receiptofbids if through written confirmation orinperson.TheBidSecurity of anyBidderwithdrawinghis bid in accordance with the foregoing conditions shall be a returned promptly.'No bids shall be withdrawn for a period of 60 days after the scheduled closing time for receipt of bids. 5. METHOD OF AWAR CP A. Award of the contract shall be to the lowest qualified bidder whose Total BaseBid(if within the funds available)constitutes the lowest aggregate bid for the work. B. If such lowest base bid exceeds the budget,the Owner may reject.all bids. C. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids or to waive any irregularity or informality in any bid received. D. Unless otherwise stated in the Special Provisions, all contracts will be awarded in conformance with thelaws of the State of Montana_Pursuantto Section 18-1-102,Montana Code Annotated,the Owner,in awardingpublic contracts for construction,repair,andpublic • SUPPLEMENTARY CO;v'DTTfONS Page 4 OCT-16-01 09 :07 FROM -ROB RT PECCIASASSOC . ID:44475036 PACE 7/31 works of all kinds,shall award such contract to the lowest responsibleBidderwiihoutregard to rasidenc . However,aresidentbidder must be allowed a reference on a contract against •I Y P g the bid of any non-resident bidder from any state or country that enforces a preference for resident bidders. The preference given to resident bidders of this state must be equal to the preference given in the other state or country. E. The Owner may make such investigations as it deems necessary to determine the ability of the Bidder to perform the Work, and the Bidder shall furnish to the Owner all such information and data for this purpose as the Owner may request.The Owner reserves the rightto reject any.Bid if the evidence submitted by,or investigation of,suchBidde-rfails to satisfy the Owrier that such Bidder.is properly qualified to carry out the obligations of the Agreement and to complete the Work contemplated therein. 6. PERFORMANCE, LABOR AND MATERLAL PAYMENT BONDS AND INSURANCE A. The Owner will require the successful.Contractor to furnish a Performance Bond in the amount of I 00-percentof the contract price as security for the faithful-performance of his Contract. B The Owner will.require the successful Contractor to furnish a Labor and Material Payment Bond in the amount of 100 percent of the contract price as security for the payment of all persons performing labor and furnishing materials in connection therewith. C. The bonds will be signed by the Attorney-in-fact and countersigned by aMontana Resident Agent. D. Prior tobeginning work,Insurance Certificates as proof ofinsurance coverage shall be filed with the Owner.The specifications for the Workers'Compensation,Commercial General Liability,Separate Owner's and Contractor's Protective Policy,and other related insurance are listed in these Contract Documents. 7. MONTANA CONTRACTOR'S TAX All Bidders are reminded.that one.percent of the total bid-will be withheld from all payment,for projects over$5,000.00,due to.Contractor pursuant to Section 15-50-205,MCA. 8. PAYROLLS AND BASIC RECORDS Payrolls and basic records-relating thereto will be maintained during the course of the work and preservedfor a periodof three years thereafterfor all laborers andmech anics workingat the site of the work,or in the development of the project. Such records will contain the name and address of each employee, his correct classification, rates of pay, daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made,and actual wages paid. • SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS Page 5 OCT-18-01 OS : 08 FROM:R08ERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PACE 6/31 The Contractorwill submitweekly acopyof all payTolls to the Ownerorhis representative. Thecopy • shall be accompanied by a statement signed by the employer orhis agent indicating that thepayrolls are correct and complete,that the wage rates contained therein are not less than those determined by the MontanaDepartment of Labor and Industry,and that the classifications set forth foreach laborer or mechanic conform with the work he performed. The prime Contractor will make the record required under the labor standards clause of the Contract available for inspection by authorized representatives of the Owner and the Montana Department ofLabor and Industry and will permit such' representatives to interview.employees during working hours on the job. Payroll reports and statements of compliance shall be submitted to the Engineer prior to or with each Payment Request. 9. , GOVERNING STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Jurisdiction. The performance of this work shall be under-the jurisdiction of the following agencies, departments, and standards and compliance with the requirements-thereof is required: Federal Level. United States law;United States Corps of Engirieers;Environmental Protection Agency. State Level.Montana Code Annotated;Montana Department of Environmental Quality; • Dept:of Fish, Wildlife & Parks (SPA); Department of State Lands; the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation; the Montana Building Codes Division; Uniform Building Code, (latest edition); Uniform Plumbing Code, (latest edition); Uniform Mechanical Code, (latest edition); Uniform Fire Code(latest edition);National EIectric Code, (latest edition). Permits.The Contractor must also comply with the requirements of any permits obtained. for theprojectby the Owner.Thesepermits may include stream bed crossing permits,flood plain permits, etc. Copies of any of these permits are available upon request from the Engineer.However,the Contractor-shall be responsible for obtaining any permits regarding the discharge of any waterrelated to the construction of this project(this includes aMontana Department of Environmental Quality 3ATennit). Local Level.Local city and county ordinances and regulations. B. Contractor's Responsibility.The Contractor shall familiarize himself with the requirements of all regulatory agencies pertaining to the performance of the work on the project. The Contractor-shall perform all work in accordance with the regulatory requirements. Any. conflict between the Contract Documents and the regulatory requirements shall be brought to the immediate attention of the Engineer. • SUPPLENIEWrARY CONDMONS Page 6 OCT-18-01 OS : 06 FROM:WERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:IW4475036 PAGE S/31 10. WEED CONTROY. Prior to mobilizing equipment on the project site,the Contractor shall clean his equipment and vehicles to assure no weeds are imported.If there is an abnormal growth of noxious weeds on aproject site afterconstruction as determined by the Owner or local weed control authority,the Contractor will be responsible for weed control under the contract warranty. ` 11. CONTRACTOR RERVIBURSED ENGINEERING COSTS The Contractor shall reimburse the Owner the full cost of Engineering services in the event the .. Engineer incurs unscheduled emplgyment necessitated by the Contractor_ A. Examplesof unscheduled employment-of the En gineer are the following Contractor actions: 1) Working more than forty(40)hours per week,more than five(5)days per week and Saturdays;Sundays,and holidays.. 2) Furnishing'materials or equipment not in conformance with Contract Documents necessitating redesign by.the Engineer. 3) Working beyond the time of completion established in the Notice to Proceed with Construction. 4) Retests by the Engineer of tests that have failed. 5) Retests by others for tests that.require Engineer's presence. 6) Repeated review of submittals and shop drawings that have not been approved.. 7) Additional inspection as:-a result of unacceptable work. 8) Other services�that-are within the Contracior'scontrol to avoid. B. The Engineering fees to bereimbursedby the Contractor shalTbe according to the following schedule: 1) Labor. At the Engineer's current billable rates as referredto in the Agreement between the Owner and Engineer,plus 15%,hot to exceed$90.00perhour and$900-00perday per.person. 2) Other Consultant: At actual cost plus 107c 3) Mileage: 4X4 @ 50.38/mi.;2N'-'"D C S0.33/mi. 4) Per Diem:IRS allowable rate • SUPPLEMENTARY CONDMONS Page 7 a. OCT-16-01 OS : 0B FROM:ROBERT PECCI.ABASSOC . ID<406447SO36 PACE 10/31 s � 5) Other expenses and laboratory testing: Actual Cost+ 10 is 6) Field Testing: Engineer's current billable rate for specific equipment utilized Contractorshall makepayment of theseEngineering services by deduction from the project progress payments or final payment or by invoice to the Contractor. The Engineering contract will be analyzed at the end of the project to determine whether any unscheduled employment of the Engineer;duritig the schedule contract time,resulted in acost savings to the Owner_ If, as a result of working more than 40 hours per week, five days per week, the Contractor completes the project within thescheduled time,and if the overtime results in a reduced contract time and cost savings to the Owner, no damages will be assessed for the unscheduled employment of the Engineer during the scheduled Contract time. Damages will be assessed as stipulated for each day the work remains uncompleted beyond the scheduled contract time. 12. CONSTRU01ON PROGRESS A. The Contractor shall maintain suitable progress on the job at all times.This shall include the presence of full crews with superintendents effectively operating with properequipment and tools.In the event the Owner is dissatisfied.with the slow progress or incompetence in the performance of the work,the Owner will give the Contractor written notice in which the OwnerwiIl specifyin detail the cause of dissatisfaction.Should the Contractorfail orrefuse to remedy the matters indicated and fail to submit a detailed schedule indicating how the 06bUmaorshallcompletethework-intheContractTimeremainin-withinten(10)daysafter i the written notice is received by the Contractor,the Owner will have the right to take control of the work and either make good the deficiencies of the Contractor itself or direct the ac- tivities of the.Contractor as the Owner deems advisable,or the Owner may terminate the Contract. In either event, the Owner will be entitled to collect from the Contractor all expenses in completing the work. a. B. ' Should an unf6reseen orchanged site condition arise on a portion ofthe work,the Contractor shall immediately notify the Owner in writing.The Owner and Engineer will work with the Contractor to-resolve such a condition in a fair and equitable manner as soon as.possible. However,the Contractor shall continue work on any or all portions of the work that are not directly affected by the unforeseen or.changed site conditions or, when directed by the Engineer,the Contractorshall continue work on the disputed portion of the workin confor- mance with the appropriate section of these General Requirements.No claim for additional Contract Price or Time for standby will be allowed when work not directly affected by the unforeseen or changed site condition can beperformed.Failure or refusal of the Contractor to continue such work will be cause for the Owner to take control of the work or terminate the Contract as herein provided and to employ such additional help as the Owner deems advisable to maintain progress. The costs of any such work will be deducted from the Contractor's monthly progress payments. The Contractor shall be subject to liquidated damages for any overrun of the Contract Time resulting from his failure or refusal to continue work as described above. • SGPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS Page 8 OCT-16-01 OS : OS FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:6447S03S PAGE 11/31 13. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT QUALITY • A. General. Items requiring repair or replacement due to damage or removal or otherwise necessitated in the course of pursuance of the work and which are not otherwise specified herein,shall be repaired or replaced to the following levels of quality. B.. Paved and Graveled Roads.Curband Gutter,Driveways.andSidewalks.Repair orreplace- . ment shaII be to a thickness and grade matching the existing condition.Quality of materials. and methods shall comply--with respective sections of the current edition of the Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. Anyremovedordamagedpavement markings shall be replaced to match the existing markings. C. Water and SewerMains and Services.Repairorreplacement shall beinamannerconsistent with the existing condition using materials conforming to the Uniform Plumbing Code,the current editions of the Montana Department.of Environmental Quality Design Standards, and otherrequirements of the MontanaDepartmentof Environmental Quality.Construction shall also comply with the current edition of the Montana.Public Works Standard Specifications.Repair or epl acement will not be allowed with materials like the existing installation if they do not conform to the above-referenced standards- D. Electrical,TeIgplione:Cable.TV:NaturalGas-and Petroleum Lines.Repair orreplacement . . shall.be to the standards required by the utility owner and at the utility owner's option may \ be performed by the utility owner with the full cost assessed to the Contractor. • E. Lawn Restoration, Fertilizing, and Seeding. All areas disturbed by the Contractor's operations such as,but notlimited to,haul roads,loading operations and disposal operations shall be restored by grading to the original contours,sodding,and/or fertil izing and seeding. This will include repair or replacement of all disturbed vegetation to pre-construction standards as required by the Owner and landowner.The seed nvxture and fertilizer to be used will be submitted to the Engineer prior to application on the prepared seed bed. The Contractor shall include the cost of this work in the price bid for other items of work,and no separate compensation will,be allowed. F. Fences.All fences adjacent to alit'work site are to be maintained to the satisfaction of the abutting property owners_ The Contractor shall notify the landowners of the need to temporarily remove or relocate fences for access to the work and shall coordinate such activities with the respective landowners in regards to removal,relocation,and restoration of fences prior to commencing work. Any fence removed or destroyed during the course of the Contract shall be reinstalled or reconstructed in like kind at no cost to the Owner or the landowner. The cost forthis work shall be considered incidental and no additional compensation will be allowed. • SUPPLENENTARY CO_NDMONS Page 9 OCT-16-01 09 :09 FROM:ROBERT PECCIASASSOC . ID :406447506 PAGE 12/31. i G_ Other Items.Repair or replacement of other items not covered by the preceding shall be to • the standards required by the owner of the item and at the owner's option may be performed by the owner of the item with the full cost assessed to the Contractor. H_ Decisions Regarding Repair Versus Replacement.The decision ofrepairversusreplacei ment of an shall be at the discretion of the Engine er upon consultation with the owner ofthe item.The decision shall be based on a determination of whether repaired quality can equal the quality of a replacement installation.The Engineer's authority shall be final in this regard. I. Limits of Repair or Replacement. The limits of areas to be.repaired or replaced shall be determined by the Engineer in the field based on the extent of damage orremoval sustained The determination shall-be based on insuring that all damaged or reriioved portions of the existing installation are fully restored.The authority of the Engineer in this regard shall be final. All work effects outside limits as described in these Contract Documents are subject to repair and replacement quality as described herein.` J. Repair by Party Owning or Maintaining;Item:The party owning.or. naintainin,the item under consideration shall have the exclusive right to undertake repair or replacement themselves and charge the Contractor.for full costs incurred or to direct and supervise the .. Contractor to repair or replace-the item to their standard of quality.The authority of the owner of the item shall be final in this regard. 14.. REJECTED WORK Any defective work or nonconforming materials or equipment that may be discovered at any time prior to the expiration of the warrainty peri od,.shall be removed and replaced by work which shall conform to the provisions of the Contract Documents-Any material condemned or rejected shall be removed at.once from the project site_Failure on the part of the Engineer to condemn or reject bad or inferior work or to note nonconforming materials or equipment on Contractors submittals shall not be construed to imply acceptance of such work.The Owner shall reserve and retain all its rights and remedies at law against the Contractor and its Surety for correction of any and all latent defects discovered after the guarantee period. The Engineer will have the authority to reject work which does not conform to the Contract Documents and will provide the Owner with alist of defective work and nonconforming materi al.s or equipment.The Owner will then promptly provide the Contractor with the list of defective work and nonconforming materials or equipment. 15. TRAFFIC CONTROL The Contractor shall schedule his construction operations in a manner which will assure that: 1)the safety and convenience of motorists and pedestrians, and the safety of construction workers, are adequately met at all times;and 2)the project is completed in amanner most beneficial to the project SUPPLIIvIEN"I'ARYCONDlTIONS Page 10 OCT-16-0 1 09 : 10 FROM:RO ERT PECC'I ABASSOC . I D- 44 7S036 PAGE 1 3/31 as awhole.A.11 signing and striping shall conform to the standards set forth in the Manual of Uniform ' Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD). •' Traffic control shall be provided in full compliance with MUTCD during materials hauling and equipmencoperationor transport alongpublic roadways.Control'shall include necessary signing,flag- persons,barricades,and hazard markers.At least one-way traffic shall bemaintained at al l times with continuous passage for emergency vehicles from either direction.In special cases as noted in the Special Provisions,maintenance 4.two way traffic may be required_ At the conclusion of daily construction activities,the Contractorshall insure that propertraffic control measures remain in effect overnight and through the weekend.This includes protecting any open excavations or other hazards. Prior to'any construction,the Contractor shall prepare and submit a detailed traffic control plan in accordance with the Submittals Section.The plan shall include,:at a minimum;the following: Calendar time periods of proposed traffic interruptions and control. Locations ofall signs,markers;barricades,and other traffic control devices tobe used: - Specifications for signs,markers,and barricades including references to MUTCD_ • Locations for flag-persons where used,along with anticipated dates and hours of use: • Routing of any detours required. Thetraffic plan will be subject to review and approval by theMontana Department of Transportation for roads under their jurisdiction,by the local county for county roads;by the local-municipalities for municipal roads,and by the U.S_Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management forroads under their control.These approvals will be in addition to that provided by the Engineer in accordance with the • Submittals Section.No work may commence until all approvals of the traffic plan have been secured. 16. CONTRACT DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES A. In the event that any.provision of one Contract Document conflicts with the provision of anotherContractDocument,theprovisionin that Contract Document fustlisted below shall govern,except as otherwise specifically stated: • Agreement • Addenda to Contract Documents • Performance and Labor&Materials Bonds Proposal (bid) • Bid Security Special Provisions , • Invitation to Bid • Instructions to Bidders • Drawings Technical Specifications • Supplementary Conditions • General Conditions SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS Page 11 OCT-le-01 09: 10 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . 10:406447SO36 PACE 14/31 17. PROJECT CLOSE-OUT • A. Once the Contractor has completed construction,a substantial completion inspection is held to assess any remaining or corrective work and permit close-out of the Contract. The following conditions must be met before the substantial completion inspection is scheduled: • Work must be substantially complete.and fit for its intended purpose. • Contractor must file a Contractor's Certificate of Completion (form found under MiscellaneousForms in Appendix A)requesting a substantial completion inspection by the Owner and Engineer:. B. Followingthe inspection,the Engineer prepares and signs aCertificate of Substantial Com_ pletion and attaches a list of any remaining or corrective work;needed based on the inspection.The Certificate is sent to the.Contractor,who must complete the listed work..- Afterthe Engineer verifies its completion,the construction is considered fully complete.The Owner may also wish to field-verify proper completion. C_ Priorto final payment including release of retainage,the Contractor must furnish these items to the Engineer: • Completed Affidavit on Behalf of Contractor(lien release)using the form provided in the Contract Documents under Miscellaneous Forms. • Executed copies of any pending Change Orders or claims. • The final Change Order shall'reconcile bid quantities to reflect actual quantities for projects containing unit price items. • Completed,revised and annotated record drawings and survey notes. • Additional Copies of O&M manuals and warranties as specified. • Final Payment Request for balance of Contract Price due. • Completed Consent of Surety Company to Final Payment using the form provided in the Contract Documents under Miscellaneous Forms. • Certification of Payment of. Prevailing Wage Rates as/if required by agencies providing funding for the project. Upon receipt and approval of these items.the Engineer will recommend final payment.The retainage will be released with the final payment. • SUPPLENMNTARY CONDITIONS Page 12 OCT-IB-01 09 - 10 FROM:ROOBBERT PECCIABASSOC.. IO= 6447SO36 PAGE iS/31 18_ WARRANTY 1 • The contractor shall warranty all materials and equipment furnished and work performed for aperiod of one year from the date of substantial completion. The contractor warrants and guarantees during the warranty period that the completed system is free from all defects due to faulty materials or workmanship and the contractorshalI promptly make such corrections as maybe necessary by reason of such defects including the repairs of any-damage to other parts of the system resulting from such defects.The Owner will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness.In the event the contractor should fail to make such repairs,adjustments;or other workthat maybe made necessary by such defects, the Owner may do so and charge-the Contractor the cost thereby incurred. The Performance Bond shall remain in full force and effect through.the warranty period. In addition, the Contractor shall attend-a warranty inspection;'approximately 11 months.after substantial, completion. The Owner and Engineer will�'aiso be present at this inspection_ All components of the project will be inspected-for defects in materials or workmanship.Any defects found shall be repaired by the.Contractor`as set`forth iii-th'e previous paragraph. SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS Page 13 OCT-16-01 . 09 : 1 1 FROM,ROSERT PECC I A&ASSOC . I D:406447S0 6 PAGE 16/3 1 SECTION 021930 • COVER SOIL PART GENERAL e - 1. DESCRIPTION A. Topsoil shall be called cover soil after it has been excavated and shall be used to coverall areas to be seeded. Actual thickness of salvaged soil invariable and ' Al be field determined during construction. B. Salvage and Replace-On-Site Cover Soil Source: This work'consists of site. development,excavadng�stockpiling,hauliri�,depositin"spreading,and preparing for seeding all topsoil and subsoil material to be used'as cover soil. All cover soil shall be salvaged dunng.excavauon and embankment and replaced on construction- . disturbed areas prior to seedbed.prepaxaiion. 1) All construction disturbed areas shall be revegetated;including road right-of- ways. Slopes to receive salvasdd soil will not exceed 3:1. Application raids shall be a minimum of 4.inches at all construction disturbed areas to be revegetated. • PART 2 MATERIALS 1. COVER SOII. A. Topsoil and subsoil shall be excavated to a one-foot depth or as otherwise determined. by the.Engineer from.areas to be disturbed by project construction_ The suitable topsoil,and subsoil used as cover soil shall be reasonably free of trash, rocks,hard lumps of soil, stumps, or brush. Noxious weeds shall be pulled and disposed of properly before topsoil stripping. Suitable cover soil shall contain sod or soils with -large amounts of humus and other organic materials to promote plant growth. Cover soil suitability will be determined by the Engineer. Suitable soil salvaged shall be stockpiled from unsuitable soil and shall be stored in a manner to prevent erosion or contamination. PART 3 EXECUTION 1. SITE DEVELOPMENT A. Site development p4fornsed by the Contractor will include clearing and grubbing as SEPTEMBER 2001 • COVER SOIL 1 021930 OCT-16-01 09 : 11 FROM:VERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID: 4475036 PAGE 17/31 necessary to prepare the soil borrow area for topsoil and subsoil salvage. Clearing and grubbing consists of removing and disposing of trees,stumps,brush,roots,rock, •' logs, timber, debris, and other non-soil material. 2. COVER SOIL SALVAGE A. Where visible as distinct strata and greater than 6-inches in thickness, topsoil and subsoil shall be excavated and salvaged in separate operations. The first lift, comprised of existing topsoil, shall be stripped.- The second lift, comprised of , underlying subsoil,shall then be stripped separately. The exact depths of excavation shall be site specific as determined by visual classification. B. First Iift topsoil and second lift subsoil shall be stockpiled in separate piles and shall be located.-where they will not.impair drainage. Stockpiles shall be.shaped and smoothed to facilitate measurement of the piles. Where possible;topsoil and subsoil shall.be hauled directly.to the prepared.areas to be covered. C. Materials excavated and-:stockpiled as described herein shall be removed in an operation separate from other excavation. Care shall be exercised to avoid the incorporation of any deleterious subsoils during this-work. 3. COVER SOIL.PLACEMENT A. Cover soil shall not.be placed until the areas to be covered have been properly • prepared and all construction work in the area has been completed. All slopes to receive cover soil shall have a rough surface. Smooth slopes to receive cover soil shall have a rough surface. Smooth slopes shall be scarified parallel to the contour- to facilitate holding cover soil in place. B. Ordinary sod or soil containing grass roots shall be broken up before being placed. Broken up sod or soil shall be capable of passing a 2-inch sieve opening. C. Cover soil material shall.be placed on areas to. be covered as the soil occurred naturally,with subsoil (second lift) material placed first and underneath the topsoil (first lift)material. D. As determined by the field Engineer,excess coversoil shall be: 1) Placed in the on-site spoils deposition area; or 2) Used as non-critical embankment; or 3) Used to increase topsoil thicknesses where possible. E. After the coversoil has been spread, all large clods, hard lumps, rocks, large roots over 6 inches in diameter, litter, and other foreign material (exposed iron timbers, etc.)shall be raked up, removed from-the seeding areas, and disposed of properly. SEPTEMBER 2001 • ' COVER SOIL 2 02/930 OCT-lb-01 09 : 11 FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 16/31 The cover soil shall be brought to a fri able condition to an average depth of 6,inches. • F. The finished elevation of the topsoil shall match the final grades shown•on the Drawings or the original ground elevation over pipe trenches. 4. SEEDBED PREPARATION A. Prior to executing the seeding,fertilizing,and mulching work items,the seedbed at all sites shall be prepared so these items can most effectively be completed in conformance with the Technical.Specifications. The seeding, fertilizing, and mulching work items shall be executed only after the seedbed has been reviewed by the Engineer. 5. SEDIMENT CONTROL . A_ Sediment control provisions.shall be used whenever work is conducted adjacent to, . . . or in drainages or watercourses to control silt.in.runoff. Adequate silt barriers or sediment traps shall be.used to comply .with permit conditions and statutory requirements for all stream-side work—both.during and..after.working hours_ Measures used may include staked straw.bales,sediment:.ponds,:and/or staked silt fence (Mirafi "Enviro-Fence",, or equal). Sediment control measures shall be: considered incidental to the Work,and no separate payment for them will be allowed. • END OF SECTION 02/930 File: 02930-53.wpd d. • SEPTEMBER 2001 COVER SOIL 3 O1J930 OCT-19-01 09 : 12 FROM:RJHRT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID: 447503E PAGE 19/31 SECTION 02/931 •� FFQRTILIZUI G AND SEEDING PART GENERAL I. GENERAL A. This work shall consist of ground surface preparation; furnishing,applying and . incorporating fertilizer into the soil;executing Summer Erosion Control Procedures; furnishing and planting seed; mowing; tracking; and cleanup. Fertilizer and seed shall be applied to all project areas requiring revegetadon. All construction disturbed areas (excluding paved, graveled, and-sodded areas) shall be fertilized and seeded, including road right-of-ways: 2. SUBMITTALS .. A. The following subuidEtals for construction shall be made in accordance with project submittal requirements as described in the Supplementary Conditions. 1) Fertilizing and Seeding Equipment and Methods. 3. SEED CERTIFICATION A. Seed certification's shall be submitted to the•Engineer prior to any seeding. The Contractor shall also submit a copy of the bill or other documentation from the seed supplier.showing actual bulk weights of the individual seed types combined in the mix. The required certifications and documentation shall be provided to the Engineer at least three days prior to seeding. 4. INDIGENOUS SEED CERTIFICATION A. Defined by MCA 80-5-101(4): "Indigenous seeds include the seeds of those plants that are naturally adapted to an area where the intended use is for the revegetation of disturbed sites. These species include grasses, fortis, shrubs and legumes." The Contractor must supply the Engineer with all seed bag tags and'.a certification from the supplier stating that the seed complies with the Federal Seed Act and the Montana Seed Laws (MCA 80-:5-101 through 305). 5. FERTILIZER CERTIFICATION A. Fertilizershall be deliveredin,.tandard size bags of the manufacturer showing weight. analysis and manufacturer's name, or in bulk quantities accompanied with written SEPTEM 3ER 2001 • FERTILIZING AND SEEDING 1 02/931 OCT-16-01 OS - 12 FROM=ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID=406447SO36• PACE 20X31' r • certifications from the manufacturer stating that the fertilizer supplied complies with applicable specifications_ PART 2 MATERIALS L INDIGENOUS SEED A. All seed shall comply with andbe labeled in accordance with the Montana Seed Law. MCA 80-5-104(2) states: "Indigenous seeds, as defined in 80-5-101, in amounts of 1 pound or more, whether in package orbulk,must be labeled with the following information." (a) . . . the statement "labeled only for.reclamation.purposes"; (b) . . . lot number or other distinguishing mark; (c) . . . the common name, genus,species and subspecies,when applicable, - including the name of each.kind ofseed present in excess of 5.percent. When two or more kinds of seed are maned on the label,the-label shall specify the percentage of each. When only one.kind of seed is present in excess.of 5 percent and no variety name or type designation is shown, the percentage must apply to seed of the kind named. If the-name of the variety is-given;the name may be associated with the.name of the kind. The percentage in this case may be`shown as"pure seed" and must apply only to seed of the variety named; • (d) state or'country of origin; (e) the approximate percentage of viable seed,together with the date of test. When labeling mixtures,the percentage viability.of each kind shall be stated; (f) the approximate percentage by weight of pure seed,meaning the freedom of seed from inert matter and from other seeds; (g) the approximate percentage by weight of sand,dirt,broken seeds,sticks, chaff and other inert matter; (h) the approximate total percentage by weight of other seeds; (i) the name and approximate number of each kind of species of prohibited and restricted noxious weed seeds occurring per pound of seed; and Q). the full name and address of the.person,firm or corporation selling the seed. B_ As listed in the Montana Seed Lave, seed shall contain no "PROHIBITED"noxious weed seed. The seed shall contain no"RESTRICTED".noxious weed seed in excess of the maximum numbers per pound as specified by MCA 80-50-105 or as specified by the appropriate County Weed Board,whichever is more stringent. The number of seed allowed per Pound,for all other noxious weed seeds shown on the "restricted list" will be zero. SEPTEMBER 2001 • FERTILIZLNG AND SEEDING 2 . 02/931 OCT-16-01 09 - 12 FROM INERT PECC I ABASSOC C . I D:14447SO36 PAGE 21/3 L C. Seed shall be grown in the North American continent above 41 degrees north i Iatitude. Known v2rieties whose origin is above the 41st b. parallel but gown below •/ P are acceptable. All seed shall be a standard grade adapted to Montana conditions_ Seed which has become wet,moldy,or otherwise damaged will not be accepted. D. Calculations of pure"live seed"may be made on the basis of either a germination test or a tetrazolium test in addition to the purity analysis. Seed shall be applied on a pure "live seed" basis. The quantity of pure "live seed" in a 100-pound container shall be determined by the formula: 100 multiplied by germination percentage and this product multiplied by the purity percentage. (For example,if the seed is 85 percent pure and test 90 percent germination, then a'100 percent container would contain 76.5 pounds of pure."live seed.") 2. FERTILIZER A.;. Fertilizer shall be a,soluble commercial.carrier of'available plant food element or combination thereof... The fertilizer shall be in uniform composition and in good condition for application by suitable equipmerit 'At shall be labeled with the manufacturer's guaranteed analysis'as governed-by applicable fertilizer laws. Any. fertilizer which becomes contaminated or damaged,making it unsuitable for use,will not be accepted. w 3. WATER A. Water used for seeding shall be of izrigation quality'and free of impurities that would be detrimental to plant growth. Any water required for seeding or mulching shall be at no additional cost-to the Owner. PART 3 EXECUTION 1. GENERAL A_ Areas to-be-seeded:-and--fertilized shall be completed, in reasonable conformity, to specified line and grade prior to seeding and fertilizing and.approved by the Engineer- B. Slopes and areas finished during the period of October 15 through April 30 or May 20,depending on seeding zone,shall be topsoiled and permanently seeded within this time period. The Centraptor.must obtain Engineer permission to commence topsoil placement and seeding operations. Slopes and areas finished during the period May 1 through October 14 shall be topsoiled in accordance with the Cover Soil Specifications, and mulched or otherwise treated in accordance with the Summer Erosion Control Procedure as specified herein. The permanent seeding of these areas SEPTEMBER 2001 • FERTILIZING AND SEEDING 3 02/931 OCT-16-01 09: 13 FROM=ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID :40644766 PAGE 2'2/31 shall then commence during the fall at a time approved by the Engineer. The • Contractor shall be required to either mulch or otherwise treat in accordance with the Summer Erosion Control Procedure or permanently seed any topsoil area within 15 days of topsoil placement. Application rates for permanent seeding are shown in this Specification under Seed Race. C. Seeding of the finished slopes shall require repeated seeding operations until approved by the Owner, and shall not be construed.to mean that the required. finishing,topsoiling,fertilizing,mulching,Summer Erosion Control Procedure,and seeding may be done only once at the convenience of the Contractor. Any additional move-in required will not be paid for separately. D. It is necessary,insofar as it is practical and feasible,that the seedbed surface,at the time of application of seeds,not be excessively wet,snow-covered,or frozen and be reasonably free of large lumps,clods,and impervious.crusts of dirt;.that there be'no appreciable areas of loose soils which can feasibly be compacted; that the surface, to a depth of approximately 4 inches, not be so tightly compacted that seed-cannot begin growth..The Contractor-shall treat such areas,.to attain,as nearly as practical, the condition described. E. If seeding is hampered' due to !standing vegetation, 'the vegetation shall then be mowed and left lay after seeding. Mowing shall be done,where terrain permits,with equipment using a cutting blade which rotates in .a plane parallel to the ground. Whether alive or dead, the vegetation shall be removed if it will prevent good • seeding practice. F. Excessively tight or compacted soils shall be loosened to the minimum depth of 4 inches.Discing,harrowing, or tilling of the soil shall be done at right angles to the natural flow of water on the slopes, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, Compaction of the soil when required shall be perforined by equipment which will produce a uniform rough textured surface ready for seeding and mulching. Compacting of loose soils may be required-by the Engineer. 2. SEED,RATE A.. The following application rates for seed are based on the drill seeding method. When the broadcast seeding method or, the hydraulic seeding method is used, the application rates listed below must be doubled,at no additional cost to the Owner: a, • SEPTEMBER 2001 FERTII.=G AND SEEDING 4 02/931 OCT-16-01 09 : 13 FROM=R BERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID: 6447SO36 PAGE 23/31 b, ; Common Scientific Variety Seed Mix (ib.PLS/acre)* Bluebunch wheatgrass A o n smithii Secar 4.0 Thickspike wheatgrass Agropyron das stab um Critana 3.0 Streambank wheal.!rass Agropyon ri arian Sodar 4.0 Ba..in mildryc El mus cincrcus tila--nar 3.0 Sheep fescue I Festuca ovina. Covar 5.0 Total 19.0 !Pounds"pure live.seed"per acre. 3 APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER A Fertilizer Rate: Fertilizer shall be applied at the rates.specified.below. Fertilizer shall be applied to the prepared seedbed prior.to seeding or.mulching and shall be blended with the cover sail as called for herein,or concurrently with the seed(as.."no-.... till" drills allow). 1) All areas shall be fertilized with an inorganic chemical fertilizer with the following nutrients: Nitrogen (EIemental) 40 lbs/acre (P.O.)Phosphorus. 60lbs/acre • P Potassium(K20) 30 lbs/acre 2) All required fertilizer certificates shall be provided to .the Engineer a minimum of three days prior to fertilizing. The certification shall include the " guaranteed analysis of the fertilizer(s) stated in terms of the percentages of nitrogen (N),available,phosphorus (P20s).and potash(KO)in that order B. Mechanical or hydraulic methods of application are acceptable so long as a uniform application at the specified rate is accomplished: Fertilizer shall be applied prior to seeding. .The application method is subject to the submittal review process. C. The fertilizer shall be incorporated.into the soil by discing, raking, or shallow plowing to the full depth of the topsoil or to a maximum depth of 6 inches,whichever is less. Exceptions will be made for seed drills that are capable of incorporating the fertilizer and seed directlyinto the seedbed. In no instance shall subsoil be incorporated into the seedbed as a result of this operation. Fertilizer shall be incorporated with equipment operated at right angles to the slope of the Iand. D. If the Contractor is required to perform the Summer Erosion Control Procedure, fertilization will be completed at the time of permanent seeding. The application SEPTEMBER 2001 • FERTILIZING AND SEEDING 5 02/931 OCT-16-01 0 : 13 FROM ,ROSERT PECCIA&ASSOC .' I13=4064475036 PACE 24/31 methods and methods for incorporating the fertilizer into the seedbed shall be • specified herein. 4_ SEED DISTRIBUTION A. Seed shall be applied to the conditioned seedbed no longer than 48 hours after the seedbed has been conditioned. Broadcast or hydraulic seeding methods shall not be used during adverse weather as determined by the Engineer. The applied seed, regardless of the method of application, shall not be covered by a soil thickness greater than 1/2-inch in depth. B. Seeding by Drill: Seeding equipment used for applying grass seed must be designed, modified or equipped to regulate the application rate and planting depth of grass seed. If equipment for sowing cover crop seed is not equipped with press wheels,the seed shall be compacted-with a eultipacker immediately after the ground has been . drilled_ Seed must be uniformly distributed in.the drill hopper during the drilling operation_ Acceptable drills are: custom seeders,furrow drills,disc drills,or no till drills. All grass:e1pblishment equipment shall be operated normal to the slope drainage. _ 1). . Planting depth shall be regulated by depth bands or coulters: The drill box shall be partitioned-by dividers no more than 24 inches apart, in order to provide formore even distribution on sloping areas. A drill shall be no wider than the width of the area over which it is to operate. 2). The rows of planted seed shall be"a maximum of 8 inches apart and shall be at right angles to the natural slopes. C. Broadcast Seeding: Seeding by hand or mechanical broadcasting will be permitted on areas inaccessible to drills or impractical to seed by other prescribed methods. Broadcast seeding requires the approval of the Engineer. D. Hydraulic Seeding: Hydraulic seeding equipment may be used_ Seed and mulch will be applied in separate and distinct operations except for the following: 1) When using the hydraulic seeding method, the Contractor must provide 1 pound of wood fiber or organic mulch per each 3 gallons of water in the hydraulic seeder as a cushion against seed damage. The mulch used as a cushion rnaZ be part of the total required mulch with the remainder applied after the seed is in place. 2) Whemhydraulically applying mulch in a separate operation, the Contractor may mix the seed with the fertilizer if his hydraulic seeding equipment is capable of uniformly mixing water, fertilizer, and seed—in that order--and power blowing or spraying the mixture uniformly over the seedbed. THIS OPTION OF MIXING FERTILIZER AND SEED WITH MULCH MAY ONLY BE APPLIED ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1_ After blending, • SEPTEIvIBER 2001 FERTILIZING AND SEEDING 6 02/931 OCT-19-01 09 + 14. FROM.RQBERT P.ECC I A&ASSOC I D:#4475036 PAGE .2S/31 a. the slurry shall be applied to the seedbed within 45 minutes after the seed has been added to the water/fertilizer mixture. If the slurry cannot be applied •I within the specified 45 nrlinutes, it shall be fortified, at no cost to the Owner, with the correct ratio of seed to the remaining slurry and a new 45-riiinute time frame established for applying the fortified mixture. 3) . The .Contractor will be required to use extension hoses to reach the extremities of slopes. 4) The.Contractor shall remove any equipment tracks on the seedbed prior to final mulching. The-Contractor shall.use.a rake, small harrow,or other acceptable means to remove the tracks. 5. . TRACKING- A.. ... Tracking will be required on hydroseeded or broadcast areas where mulch crimping cannot be accomplished and where hydromulching will be accomplished. Exceptions will.be allowed for small areas..(0.1.ac.)not accessible to'hydroseeding equipment..: B- Tracking shall be a'tc OM' lished using. a tracked. vehicle equipped with grousers. sufficient to groove the surface to at least 1/2-inch. The tracking vehicle.shall.be: operated so.as to completely cover the surface with grouser marks. All grousers' marks shall run perpendicular to the natural slopes. The tracking vehicle.shall be - operated alternately between forward and reverse on each pass to eliminate damage to the.seedbed resulting from 1:80 degree skid turns. C. If the area is seeded.by hydraulic.methods, tracking.of the slopes shall be done at such time when the surface has had sufficient time to dry. The length of time established will be at the discretion of the Engineer. 6 SEEDING DATES A. Seeding shall be permitted from October 15 through April 30. 7. SUNNIER EROSION CONTROL PROCEDURE A_ In the event the.construction is completed after April 30 but before October 15, cover-soiled-areas shall then be either mulched immediately with a vegetative mulch of straw or hay,applied as a rate of 2,000 pounds per acre or a soil stabilizer applied at the manufacturer's recommendation with a hydroseeder. The mulch shall be anchored into.the seedbed. A "no-till" drill with "no-till" coulters may be used to seed and fertilize directly into the mulched areas during permanent seeding after the October 15 date. If a"no-till"drill (Brillion seeder,or equal)will not be utilized for permanent seeding,the seedbed preparation,fertilizing,seeding and mulching must be conducted in addition to and after Summer Erosion Control Procedure mulch SEPTE_MBER 2001 • FERTILIZING AND SEEDING 7 02/93i OCT-19-01 09 = 14 .FROM:ROBERT PECCIA&ASSOC : ID=406447SO36• PAGE 26/31 application. Areas treated with a soil stabilizer must also follow the provisions,after • the October 15 date,for permanent seeding. . B. Cost for all summer erosion control installations will be considered incidental. No additional compensation will be allowed for this work item. END OF SECTION 02/93I File: 0293I-53.wpd r. SEPTEMMBER 2001 • FERTELIZING AND SEEDLNG 8 02i931 OCT-16-01 09 , 14 'FROM VERT PECCIA&A.SSOC . ID:I6447SO36 PAGE 27/31 SECTION 02/932 MULCH PART I GENERAL 1_ DESCRIPTION A. This work shall consist of covering and processing specified seeded areas with a mulch of the stipulated materials_ 11v1ulch shall be applied to all project areas requiring revegetation_ 2. SUBMITTALS A_ The following submittals for.construction shall be made in accordance'with'the project submittal requirements as described in the Supplementary Conditions. 1) Manufacturer's specifications and material content for mulch products. 2) Manufacturer's"recommended application methods and rate. m 3) Vegetative mulch.source and weed-free certification. 3. MULCH TYPE AND RATE A. The Contractor shall use Vegetative Mulch,or Wood Fiber Mulch and Tackifier'. • B. Vegetative Mulch: A grass hay or straw mulch shall be applied at a rate of 2,000 pounds per'acre in those areas which are to be seeded with the Seed Mix. Grass hay or straw mulch shall be anchored by a mulch tiller(crimper). C. Wood Fiber Mulch shall be applied at a rate of 2,000 pounds per acre in those areas which are to be seeded. D. Tackifier shall be applied with all hydromulched areas at the manufacturer's recommended rate of 40 pounds per acre for slopes flatter than 2:1 and 80 pounds per' acre for slopes 2:1 or steeper., PART 2 MATERIALS 1. VEGETATIVE MULCH A. This type of mulch material shall be composed of grass hay,wheat straw,rye straw, or barley straw, in that order of preference. SEPTEMBER 2001 • MULCH 1 021932 OCT-16-01 OS: 14 FROM:ROSERT PEZ°CIA8ASSOC . ID:406447SO36 PAGE 26/31 • B. Grass Hay: This type of mulch material shall be composed primarily of perennial • grasses at least 10 inches. The grass hay mulch shall contain greater than 70 percent grass by weight and shall not contain greater than 10 percent alfalfa, crested wheatgrass or yellow sweet clover. Grass hay is subject to the submittal review process and must be "Montana Noxious Weed Seed Free Hay" provided by a certified supplier. C. Straw: This type of mulch material shall be clean rain straw, at least 10 inches, shall be"Montana Noxious Weed Seed Free"straw and shall not contain greater than 5 percent cereal seed by weight, (i.e., seed heads). Written confirmation from a certified supplier will be required. D. Chopped or ground material is not acceptable. The mulch material is not acceptable if it is musty,moldy or rotted,.or if it contains seedbearing stalks of noxious weeds. It shall be free of stones, dirt, roots, stumps or other-foreign material. 2. WOOD FIBER MULCH A. , Wood fiber mulch shall consist of specially prepared wood fibers and shall be processed in such a manner that it will not contain any growth or germination inhibiting factors. Fiber shall not be produced from recycled material such as sawdust,paper,cardboard,or residue from pulp and paper plants. The fiber shall be dyed an appropriate color to facilitate visual metering during application. The mulch shall be of such a consistency that after being combined in a slurry tank with water • and other approved additives,the fibers in the material will be uniformly suspended to form a homogeneous slurry. During application the material shall produce a mac- like net covering the grass seed. Wood fiber shall be supplied in packages. Each package shall be marked by the manufacturer to show the air-dry weight content. If requested by the Owner, the Contractor shall submit a signed statement certifying that the material furnished has been laboratory and field tested and that it meets requirements and intents specified. Wood fiber mulch shall be as manufactured by Weyerhaeuser Company, or approved equal. 3. TACKIFIER A. Tackifier shall be a biodegradable organic formulation processed specifically for the adhesive binding of mulch. The tackifier shall uniformly disperse when mixed with water and not be detrimental to the homogeneous properties of the mulch slurry. Any tackifier which has been moisture damaged or damaged by other means will not be acceptable. Tackifier may be added either during the manufacturing of the mulch or incorporated during mulch application. B. Organic soil and mulch tackifier for use in hydraulically planting of grass seeds, flowers,or woody tree seeds,or stolon.either alone or in combination with fertilizer, SEPTEMBER 2001 i MULCH 2 02/932 OCT-16-01 09 : 15 FROM :RVERT PECCIA&ASSOC . ID:0447SO36 PAGE 29/31 wood fiber mulch and other approved additives,shall consist of specifically blended compatible hydrocolloids. Starch-based tackifiers are unacceptable. • C. The soil and mulch tackifier shall be supplied in easily disposable packages containing 5,20, or 40 pounds of material having an equilibrium air-dry moisture content at time of manufacture of 8 percent,plus or minus 2 percent,with a minimum water-holding capacity of 6-1/2 times by weight of dry material. D. The organic soil and mulch tackifier shall have the additional characteristics of hydrating and dispersing in circulating water to form a homogeneous slurry and remain in such a state in the hydraulic mulching unit, or adequate equal, witty the specified, or other approved materials. E. Soil and mulch tackifier shall be applied at a minimun rate of 40 pounds per acre.on slopes 2A or flatter,or at SO pounds per acre,or more on slopes steeper than 2:1,or at submitted manufacturer's recommendations: F. When applied, the:organic soil and mulch tackifier shall form a.loose chain-like protective film,�but not a plant inhibiting membrane;which will allow moisture to percolate into the underlying soil, while helping "stick" seeds,.fertilizer and other, specified materials.to the soil surface during germination and initial seedling growth, after which the organic soil and mulch tackifier shall breakdown by.microbial action. PART 3 EXECILMON -- 1 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION A.' Mulch,when required,must be applied to seeded areas not more than 24 hours after seeding regardless of the type used. If the Contractor does not mulch within 24 hours after seeding,the Contractor may be required to re-seed the project at no additional cost to the Owner: Mulch shall not be applied in the presence of free surface water, but may be applied upon damp ground. Mulch shall not be applied to snow-covered ground surfaces. - B_ Mulch shall not be applied to areas having a substantial vegetative growth, such as grasses,.weeds and grains. Mulching shall not be done during adverse weather conditions or when wind prevents uniform distribution. Application,if after seeding, shall be in a manner to not seriously disturb the seedbed surface. All roadway structures and facilities shall be protected and kept undamaged from application of bituminous material and other operations. Any such material deposited on such structures or facilities shall be removed,at the expense of the Contractor. SEPTEMBER 2001 • MULCH 3 02/932 OCT-16-0.1 09 : 15 FROM:ROBERT PECCIABASSOC . ID:4064475036 PAGE 30/31 C. Additional mulching ma'l be required in accordance with summer erosion control • procedures as noted in Section 02/931,FERTILIZING AND SEEDING. D. The Contractor shall remove any equipment tracks on the seedbed prior to final mulching. The Contractor shall use a rake,small harrow or other acceptable means to-remove the tracks. 2 APPLICATION OF VEGETATIVE MULCH A,. Vegetative mulch shall be applied after seeding and fertilizing is completed. The mulch shall be applied in a uniform manner by a mulch spreader, at the rate specified. The mulch spreader shall be designed specifically for this type of work. The vegetative material shall be fed into the mechanical mulch spreader at.an even, uniform rate. B. When asphalt or a tackifying agent is used as a binder for vegetative mulch, it shall be applied at the rate specified.. It shall be evenly distributed over the vegetative material as it emerges from the blower discharge or it may be hydraulically applied directly follow;ing mulch application. Uneven distribution,caused by inadequately .power or improperly adjusted equipment,poor workmanship, erratic material feed or discharge, or similar causes within the Contractor's control, shall be corrected. The quantity of asphalt or tackifying agent specified is subject to increase or decrease as determined in the field by the Engineer.. • C. Straw or native hay shall be uniformly spread at the rate specified. Unless otherwise authorized by the Engineer,straw or hay shall be anchored into the seedbed by using a mulch crimper. Straw or hay shall have a minimum Iength of 10 inches and shall be pliable. If straw breaks during crimping, it shall be sprinkled with water, not soaked,to facilitate placement. D. The mulch crimper,specifically designed for this type of work,shall have round,flat (not angled),notched blades of these approximate dimensions: 1/4-inch thick by 18 inches in diameter*%nd spaced 8 inches apart. The crimper shall have sufficient weight to force the vegetative mulch a minimum of 3 inches into the soil and shall be equipped with disc scrapers. Mulch crimping shall be done on all slopes capable of being safely traversed by a tracked vehicle. All mulch crimping shall be done perpendicular to the flowline of.the slope. 3 APPLICATION OF WOOD FIBER MULCH A. Wood fiber mulch or organic mulch shall be applied by means of hydraulic equipment which utilizes water as the carrying agent. A continuous agitator action, that keeps the mulching material and approved additives in uniform suspension,must be maintained throughout the distribution cycle. The pump pressure shall be capable • SEPTEMBER 2001 MULCH 4 02/932 OCT-lb-01 09: 1S FROM-ROB RT PECCIA&AS'SOC . ID=406447SO36 PAGE . 31/31 of,maintaining a continuous non-fluctuating stream of slurry. The slurry distribution lines shall be large enough to prevent stoppage. B. The discharge line shall be equipped with a set of hydraulic spray nozzles which will provide an even distribution of the mulch slurry to the seedbed. Mulching shall not be done in the presence of free surface water resulting from rains,melting snow,or other causes. C. The Contractor shall stairs at the top of the slope and work downward. If necessary, he may be required to use extension hoses to reach the extremities of slopes- -END OF SECTION 02/932 File: 02932-53.wpd •� SEPTEMBER 2001 MULCH 5 02I932 EXHIBIT 3G BAXTER MEADOWS — PHASE II October 2003 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PARKING ANALYSIS Current Zoning: B2 Section 18.50.110 Parking Requirements Current Requirement: Table 2.a. Non-Residential Uses Variance Requested: Blended Requirement— 1.72 spaces/1000 s.f. Total Number of Buildable Lots: 53 Total Square Footage: Parking Provided: Off-Street - 129 Spaces On-Street - 475 Spaces Total - 604 Spaces Types of Parking to be provided. Long Term Long Term Parking will be concentrated around the periphery of the Neighborhood Center in larger surface lots or parking structures. These facilities will have access to the busier streets; Baxter Lane, Davis Road and Deadman's Gulch. Short Term Short Term Patron Parking spaces will be located throughout the Neighborhood Center. These spaces will be concentrated around the town center to provide the most convenient parking. Errand Parking Errand Parking space will be widely distributed throughout the Neighborhood Center. These spaces may require enforcement of time regulation to ensure short duration of stay and high turnover of these spaces. Enforcement will be the responsibility of the Neighborhood. Service Parking Service Parking will be primarily located in the alleys or in designated service courts. Bicycle and Motorcycle Parking Bicycle and Motorcycle Parking will be dispersed throughout the Neighborhood Center in both on-street and off-street locations. Specific Strategies Lot 1, Block 15 will be designated in the covenants and restrictions as multi-family only. Any proposed development must provide all required parking on-site. The 163 adjacent on-street parking spaces are for Neighborhood Center use. The parking lots; Lot 2, Block 16; Lot 3, Block 17; Lot 10, Block 18; Lot 8, Block 19; Lot 3, Block 20; and Lot 3, Block 21 will remained Association-owned and available to all property owners for parking. Baxter Meadows Development will provide additional pay-to-park lots on Lot 1, Block 16 and Lots 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9 with the intention that these lots may be building sites in the future. Lots 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9 will be a designated site for a future parking garage. The Neighborhood Center Association Source Book will include a waiver of rights to protest the creation of a S.I.D. to fund a future parking garage. The creation of the S.I.D. can occur only after 2/3 of the available building sites have completed structures on them. 2 OVERT PEG S �'4SS0 0 A�t� To: Phil Porrini, P.E. From: Jeff Key, P.E. Subject: Baxter Meadows Subdivision (Phase H)—Parking Date: October 30, 2003 Phil I was asked to take a look at parking needs in the `B2 commercial' area of Phase II of the Baxter Meadows Subdivision mixed-use development. This area will likely include a maximum of two-story buildings containing mostly office with some above level apartments as the project develops. A spreadsheet provided to me calculates approximately 756,430 square feet of building lot area (assuming two story building). This area was derived as follows: Total area of all lots in B2 district = 538,971 square feet Less area of parks/parking lots = 160,756 square feet Total one level building lot area = 378,215 square feet Total two level building lot area = 756,430 square feet It is further acknowledged that the Bozeman development regulations allow for a twenty percent reduction to account for the fact that all the building lot areas will not contain square footage that will generate a defined parking need(such as janitor closets,utility/maintenance rooms,etc.). Taking this into account reduces the square footage of the building lot area by which parking needs are to be determined to 605,144 square feet (756,430 sf * 80%). It is reasonable to use this square footage (605,144 square feet) as the `B2 commercial' designated area by which parking needs should be determined. The combined commercial/office/residential usage will provided for some shared parking in this development. Peak parking demand for an office will typically not coincide with that required for an apartment. Because of this, and the fact that this development is striving to be a high density, clustered, urban development,it is appropriate to use parking utilization rates between the minimum and average thresholds as recognized in the industry. As you recall,for the Trakker Building project an overall parking utilization rate of 1.72 spaces per . 1,000 square feet was used to determine the needs of that facility. The 1.72 rate was based on a weighted average of rates for the office space,warehouse space,and combined residential/office space uses as compared to the square footage of each in the overall building. It is understood that for this phase of the development, the probable usage will be comprised of a mix of residential and office space. *825 Custer Avenue* *Helena,MT 59601* *Phone 406-447-5000* *Fax 406-447-5036* The publication referenced for parking demand rates was the Highway Research Board Special Report 125—Parking Principles as prepared by the National Academy of Sciences. In this document,for a combined residential/office space mixed-use development, parking demand can vary between 0.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet to 4.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet, with an average demand of 2.65 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Interestingly enough, the commonly used average rate as presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's(ITE)publication Parking Generation presents a parking demand rate of 2.80 spaces per 1,000 square feet. In my professional view it is appropriate to use a value less than average for this urban development. I do believe the 1.72 spaces per 1,000 square feet is still appropriate and would likely prove to be conservative. This rate would require a total number of parking spaces equal to 1,041 spaces(605,144 /1,000 times 1.72). Also recognizing that this portion of the development is striving to be a clustered, high density urban example of smart growth,a rate less than the industry average could potentially be utilized,especially if the types of businesses in this clustered development will be shared businesses generating internal trips(i.e.an office worker going to a deli on their way home to an apartment in the development). This concept leads to another concern. Without knowing the exact land uses intended for all the various buildings,it is very difficult to come up with an exact parking demand and subsequent parking space requirements. It is highly recommended that as build-out of the development occurs,the types of tenants and corresponding parking demands be studied in greater detail. A similar development here in Helena(the Great Northern Town Center), which is an example of a high density,clustered, urban town center,is approximately 65%built-out now,and their parking needs are no where close to. what was predicted during the projects development. In fact the present parking garage built on the site is.being utilized in the 20-40 percent rate. This is likely to change when full build-out occurs; especially with the construction of the Cineplex—which is a very high traffic and parking generator. In any case,at this stage in the project it seems logical to use the slightly less than average rate of 1.72 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the parking demand in the`B2 commercial"area,with the caveat that this be monitored and updated as the future.land uses and specific business types are known. *825 Custer Avenue* *Helena,MT 59601* *Phone 406-447-5000* *Fax 406-447-5036* Baxter Meadows • Phase II Possible 1 Off-street On-street Total Building Parking Parking- Parking Zone Block Lot Area(SF) SF Building Spaces Spaces Spaces R3 9 1 7920 Traditional 6 6 2 7470 Traditional 6 6 3 7470 Traditional 6 6 4 7470 Traditional 6 6 5 7470 Traditional 6 6 6 7470 Traditional 6 6 7 7470 Traditional 6 6 8 7470 Traditional 6 6 9 7470 Traditional 6 - 6 10 7470 Traditional 6 - 6 11 7920 Traditional 6 - 6 R3 10 1 8628 Traditional 6 - 6 2 8188 Traditional 6 6 3 8149 Traditional 6 6 4 8110 Traditional 6 6. 5 9478 Traditional 6 6 6 6031 Traditional 6 6 7 8628 Traditional 6 6 8 8190 Traditional 6 6 9 8167 Traditional 6 6 10 8114 Traditional 6 6 11 9482 Traditional 6 6 12 6032 Traditional 6 6 R3 11 1 9264 Traditional 6 6 2 9359 Traditional 6 6 3 9169 Traditional 6 6 4 9453 Traditional 6 6 5 9648 Traditional 6 6 6 9636 Traditional 6 6 7 9333 Traditional 6 6 8 9510 Traditional 6 6 R3 12 1 55" Village 4 4 2 5360 Village 4 4 3 5388 Village 4 4 4 5416 Village 4 4 5 5445 Village 4 4 6 5493 Village 4 4 7 10088 Village 4 4 8 3164 Village 4 4 9 3024 Village 4 4 10 3168 Village 4 4 11 5460 Village 4 4 12 5250 Village 4 4 13 5250 Village 4 4 14 5250 Bungalow 2 2 15 5250 Bungalow 2 2 16 5184 Bungalow 2 2 R3 13 1 2904 Cottage 2 2 2 2772 Cottage 2 2 3 2772 Cottage 2 2 4 2807 Cottage 2 2 5 3081 Cottage 2 . 2 6 2432 Cottage 2 2 7 2432 Cottage 2 2 8 2368 Cottage 2 2 9 1650 Cottage 2 .2 10 1782 Cottage 2 2 11 3274 Cottage 2 2 12 2584 Cottage 2 2 13 2584 Cottage 2 2 14 2518 Cottage 2 2 15 3081 Cottage 2 2 16 3024 Cottage 2 2 17 3024 Cottage 2 - 2 18 3061 Cottage 2 2 19 5460 Cottage 2 2 20 2862 Cottage 2 2 21 2772 Cottage 2 2 22 2772 Cottage .. ...."" 2 2 23 2772 Cottage 2 2 24 2772 Cottage 2 2 BAXTER MEADOWS PAGE 1 10/31/03 Baxter Meadows • Phase 11 Possible 1 Off-street On-street Total Building Parking Parking Parking Zone Block Lot Area(SF) SF Building Spaces Spaces Spaces 25 2800 Cottage 2 2 26 5757 Cottage 2 2 R3 Subtotal 73 415,490 296 296 B2 14 1 18655 5-Townhouses 10 10 2 19823 5-Townhouses 10 10 3 19951 5-Townhouses 10 10 4 22750 5-Townhouses 10 10 B2 15 1 295937 Apartments ??? 163 163 B2 Subtotal-Apart 5 377,116 40 163 203 B2 16 1 17736 35472 28378 Commercial 21 21 2 13692 Parking 29 29 3 13692 27384 21907 Commercial 22 22 4 12990 25980 20784 Commercial 18 18 5 12375 24750 19800 Commercial 7 7 7 13076 26152 20922 Commercial 7 7 8 13076 26152 20922 Commercial 20 20 B2 17 1 11771 23542 18834 Commercial 19 19 2 11690 23380 18704 Commercial 7 7 3 11117 Parking 29 29 4 11975 23950 19160 Commercial 8 8 5 11975 23950 19160 Commercial 18 18 6 10731 21462 17170 Commercial 8 8 7 10731 21462 17170 Commercial 6 6 8 94260 Neigh.Park 13 13 Linear Park 17 17 B2 18 1 5407 10814 8651 Commercial 12 12 2 5407 10814 8651 Commercial 5 5 3 5407 10814 8651 Commercial 5 5 5 5290 10580 8464 Commercial 5 5 6 5290 10580 8464 Commercial 5 5 7 5290 10580 8464 Commercial 12 12 8 6610 13220 10576 Commercial 14 14 9 6707 13414 10731 Commercial 6 6 10 8052 Parking 18 18 11 19398 38796 31037 Trakker 25 25 B2 19 1 4890 9780 7824 Commercial 12 12 2 4890 9780 7824 Commercial 5 5 3 4890 9780 7824 Commercial 4 4 4 4806 9612 7690 Commercial 4 4 5 4806 9612 7690 Commercial 5 5 6 4806 9612 7690 Commercial 12 12 7 11468 Park/Storm 18 18 8 8052 Parking 21 21 9 5856 11712 9370 Commercial 4 4 10 5868 11736 9389 Commercial 5 5 11 5868 11736 9389 Commercial 14 14 B2 20 1 5491 10982 8786 Commercial 12 12 2 5288 10576 8461 Commercial 6 6 3 6997 Parking 16 16 4 .5288 10576 8461 Commercial 4 4 5 5288 10576 8461 Commercial 5 5 6 5491 10982 8786 Commercial 13 13 7 5680 11360 9088 Commercial 9 9 8 5680 11360 9088 Commercial 9 5680 11360 9088 Commercial 11 5557 11114 8891 Commercial 12 5557 11114 8891 Commercial 13 5557 11114 8891 Commercial 8 8 B2 21 1 4881 9762 7810 Commercial 11 11 2 4678 9356 7485 Commercial 6 6 3 7118 Parking 16 16 4 4678 9356 7485 Commercial 4 4 5 4678 •9356 7485. . Commercial.... . 5_.. .. . .. ..5.. _.:. 6 4881 9762 7810 Commercial 12 12 7 5137 10274 8219 Commercial 8 8 BAXTER MEADOWS PAGE 2 10/31/03 Baxter Meadows Phase II Possible 1 Off-street On-street Total Building Parking Parking Parking Zone Block Lot Area(SF) SF Building Spaces Spaces Spaces 8 5137 10274 8219 Commercial 9 5137 10274 8219 Commercial 10 5049 10098 8078 Commercial 11 5049 10098 8078 Commercial 12 5049 10098 8078 Commercial 9 9 B2 Subtotal Commercial 63 538,971 129 475 604 756,430 605,144 Q1.72/1000sf 1,041 -437 S N©6=T TOTAL 141 1,331,577 465 638 1,103 F:\S ITEDE V\BAXTE R2\BAXTE R2-P R OJ\D ES IG N_R E PORT\LOT-SIZES.XLS BAXTER MEADOWS PAGE 3 10/31/03 i4e - - - Bozeman,�ntana, i R ' BaxterMeadows - Phase Preliminary Plat 90 Baxter Meadows Development Halbert �`x �`�n Project Bozeman Montana Location � C i 90 — Xm� Baxter Lan IWttR Imf RRXW — '— _ t. i i Gd!'rn Y4 WIMFAR IWIf RISE rEll I IMRM LBFRiY � sRxau F �� rwFl XcaRxR �•,TY� OA Z Oak IFiOn I IFRu 14 NR1 � i i I i j i i __ �� [.SL10 {fRCUS 01W50" IERX I �� I i Tamamch$[ Ru "rssaRs Rtt i XFRaFUX rruRlu I I I � I � I I uXIR �� Durs ton Rd. 0RL , Xu — �0�rsfon Project Location ��' LL - _.. - it I i A LLfr RFkuPF fXl i m I 11 l $ 2 2 2 a Bozeman, MT X" ""` " o L.., B $1 4 GRWIX dE1FR v I I LL I I II MAdAASd B 1 uRRlf S z WF1aln �7Q aunRxfRR XR xRXI cwrtR j j j j I 01rre'f. RIRR RRRRFR XYEII I S! I I I N Ke[A . O 1. eRv I #� E••II I LL sh, S j 0 a SI _.i W o, L �91 i - i Gnnr Si. IT m --I — I I �o�ERT Prepared By: 4sscc%ot Robert Peccia & Associates, Helena, Montana �1� SURVEY REQUESTED BY BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMEN11WEATE A LEGEND MAJOR SUBDIVISION WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.- PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 0 FOUND 1/4 CORNER — WATER MAINS ¢ NOTES: BARTER MEADOWS PHASE H FOUND C FOUND CORNER __ WATER SERVICE g 1/4 1/4 CORNER � FIRE HYDRANTS 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m 2 AR ALL SEWER MAINS E B' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LOCATED/N THE S 1/2 OF SEC. 34, T. 1S.,& 5E, � PROPOSED BOUNDARY CORNER A BLOW OFF HYDRANT 3, ALL STORM DRAINS ARE 15'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND NE 1/4 OF SEC. 3, T.2S., R. 5E, PHASE II BOUNDARY WATER VALVES 4. ALL POCKET PARKS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOME — PUD BOUNDARY — SANITARY SEWER OWNERS ASSOCIATION. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA — LOT LINES -- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE R/W LINES O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES 01 50 0 50 100 -- EASTMENT LINES — STORM SEWER (SCALE IN FEET) O WETLANDS O STORM SEWER MANHOLES c� STORM SEWER INLETS I (\ / i 1 <.��i./,�� e:�•� / S018'3'E / 0 0 o 7\x >11104.48' IL a„i { A Oc o m� S89'41'57'Wfa L = :302.77' / / % _c a �N / A v, j R =/291.73' A= 59'27'52" v v \ 110.53' \\ \\ 1 I I R � 455.00' \ � A=\13'55'8' \\ L !i I TRACT 1 L---'7 I \ :11 1\ 1\ (15(ACRES) j I / \ I i r19 r L =\268.69' R =\345.00' 1 \.,_ ��� L \ �\ m N00'0000'W \ A = '4437'24' 191.53' 1 cc z d CL 1 R 355.00'/�S)?A� // ' // A= 96'55'8' s b^�5 �'10� '105' /h0'6 /4'i�� �_,�a1G� a'i09 � �.4�\\� .1°; �4'�N f•12A"t��••/ cc I � � - .-__ l ` �`�' '/ /� f 'ice f � j_� _.Ji \__ _..-.— ..-^,� _ .-' '-_ ..-_ .-�- -_ ..._-__ _• \ w cc w d N SHEET 1 s 1; A911L Amok SURVEY REQUESTED BY BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT IFTCREATE A ' LEGEND < MAJOR SUBDIVISION WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF da FOUND 1/4 CORNER — WATER MAINS o z BARTER MEADOWS PHASE H �� FOUND SECTION CORNER -- WATER SEANCE NOTES: • FOUND C 1/4 CORNER FIRE HYDRANTS 1. AL WATER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. kOPCD2. ALL SEWER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LOCATED IN THE S 112 OF SEC. 34, T, 1 S.,R. 5E• PI 11D BOUNDARY CORNER A BLOW OFF HYDRANT — PHASE II BOUNDARY WATER VALVES 3. ALL STORM DRAINS ARE 15' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND NE 114 OF SEC. 3, T.2S• R• 5E. — PUD BOUNDARY — SANITARY SEWER 4. OWNERS ASSOCIATION. WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOME OF P.M.M,, GAL"rIN COUNTY, MONTANA — LOT LINES -- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 50 0 50 100 — R/W LINES O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES VS EASTMENT LINES — STORM SEWER © WETLANDS O STORM SEWER MANHOLES (SCALE IN FEET) co STORM SEWER INLETS : + 1' / - -/ 1 I 13.5N TILITY - / 1 f M O \ �� 1231'U LITY .V_ / + o ni 1 \ 1 m I ] �� EASEME T / EASEM T ( i t 1 N o '( -I I o ICL / 4,889.56 4,889.56 4,889.561 14,8Q6.15 4.806.15 4,806.15 I 1 __�sT-t -- „� o g 01 Q2 - Q3 I I Q4 Q5 06 t-_- -- �__ -�- �\ �I: •I , { j 5,056.33 5,406.77 "5,406.77 I 15,289.99 5,289.99 5,289.99 S.F/ S.F. ;S.F. I I• S.F. S.F. S.F. I '- I L --1 ' N u�u!! C4 SIC, S.F. S.F. S.F. I �., S.F. ' S.F. l S.F. / 1 I� I ! ' 0 !� I I I� $ / o Oo oa m� 8 1 18 8 �' 4 I 18 Il , d 4+ , ae i I•; 1 v11� m 1 1 � �� _ -- - - - - -- s - W I CO L - _ - — — — — �- 1 I c offLoci i8— -----=ALLEY �'- - - - --__B�ocK _ _ - \� L 9 0.37% I UI -- 1-% i> —.. _050% I SY (' -- --_---_ �\ 1 + , ��� ! _ �/ -�ir�._a69s=-�-_ �8 zm �m I i 43 9.9 78 \�' 13 DE7ENt10t(POLE -- ---_ - I' -.T �`' 6 \ 1}f I 1 / � 9F t a� _1101 aw I AREA�,1,685 S.F" i < w ! 1YIlxI L ¢ / l�/, //i ii� i I 24a.CF. 1 %- I ao d� 31 TRAKKER BUILDING o '///0- (8) P ET ARK/ f I I 72. 96. 72. QO �J _LS- J� 5,5 696;0 75 9,2 20-'r �/' 19234:56/� it III Z I `t ' S.F. ' S.F. -S.F. r e ,. ' % r 8 9 0 11 1, C S.F.%// - / / I 03 0 8 3.5 98 5, 98 5, 98 W S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. h --- ---- - --`- ` I(TYP_4,PLCS)`I _�_�II TRAKKER TRAIL(9d. i �� \ 11�1•f.l � / \� I 0.78%- I +p� � I+j- of I I ` .I %%//�//r.' `.��\\.\r\�L\ �11\ 1= Y,I 1 1 oz iB � m %• ,to ro \ \ � / f��l \ i o1 Q2 3 5 Q4--sue( Q5 �`���6 �i Q1 2 Q3 4 05 06 i I I W N W 5,135.1 5,491.05 6, ^5,4T4.03 �5,4T4.16 'S;{T4.16 , �4;906.30 4,6%5 889.1 4,65 4,1i80.93 4,880.93_ I S. S.F.( S:F-.. i S: S.F. S.F. S.F. _ S.F.\` S.F. i44 \ _ CC w1� `. —48:00= -48.00-..--48.00 I 1- _ —� _ ` _ J— WIL �-mut_ s3:83' N Ie:zs�. -48:ar= Cl _ e - \ - W W ``----- •I --- 0.30% t ].JALLEY 3d'RMI� - 0.80% "T -��-r82 - -52 —5283'` 11 WI '{ 11 TILITY \ 1 F 12.31'Ul LITY �. \ i=t / I L•' EASEM T < EASDA_ __ o, ! V W. oe / I Ir O1 I I I w 07 Q8 09 I I� ©0 1O1 ® � iQ7 QB Q9 ,I' I� I�0 1Q1 I i i ��I I I I a I �� r + 5,35P85" 5,679.95'5,680.001 15,557.06 -5. 006 5,557.06' y' 5',136.55 5,136.55 5,136.551 15,048.93 5,048.93 5,048.9 3 If ' I I S.F. S.F. S.F. J 1 I I S.F. S.F. S.F. g• S.F. S.F. S:F. �r " \ S.F. SF. S.F. M}p, L I \\' SEMEN UTI ENT•R A,250':� � J/ - =•' - ---- -'- 1 \ 6 PEGS) I / I l I _ _ J d �Y W'-7-1-'•—' •/�_ 1_1 W I '—t 1 �— W � + Iry I- 1 \ 1 BAXTER LANE\1100 ! 0.5E%! ) - -- I - - �,_ -- p ►_ -- r •L:----_ =� ---=_=�--aim---- , 450.773 ��••-�� 74.75` �Jil L+=`-L.��J LNL j �'J(n�u L:a [J �' KF u� W x IL in SHEET i 2 a• a- .. . a •' a �'11111 • . .- a' a �111111 I a. .i a� • a- . a• • . •.- a- o •- �'11111 a• a. •• ■. :• a. ■■ PIM MN .i•■rw....••■•1..■■Y......■■LLLLnr1111rrr.LLLs•.r..■..■.i ■a■.■................. .....■■..■■.■■.■■.......■...■■.YY...L/���%nl'J■■■■I �■:�■i r�■en-,.- .I%one ■o■o■u.uu■u.....unla._ao.:r.•ule•,a■■r ��r.■■■n.uuuuuuu....u.u.n.u...1o.a..�.o•+u.:mae•io_Ir•:�..�.■■.. ■■� ��. is .��. _.... . ■.;... . ��u••o+r►u0u■ Lioi.i.io.�ui.i■i.i.9.i'�nii■ ■�a..L.■:::::I o n i::::: ....■i.■\Mommem.ium�uuuu.��lrl.ii.n.iaiu�i/ .i.iu.ii■...-----....■:i■■ I■■■■■■ .■a■■■ ■.......nUO....■...n.1U...■�■ll.■O.■■■■■■�l.�IL n.■■.■1J.....•■U■■.......•U.■■1■■u.nln.i.....0..■l..a■.■...U■■■c0..■■Q..■.... 11 ■■ ■■ 11,X65 JPtEn c O. ■■ ■■ •• ■■, !� •1 ■■, I ■■ 1021.07 . . J� .2• 18 62.05 ::, ,i■ ��8..� r •1 :: :: • 1 11.9.65 • N. \c:: ,. e: .. ■r; •� ,•� �•�Iuu■ uuuuu�nu a.uuu■a.uu.�� avamollsommal uuuu.�uuuuuu;;;=,r� •••;;;.r,.puuumo_um.nuu.uu�■uuuuuuuunnwwmm• ---^•■-esoonon u.u■�.u.uu.u■ to °`its i�w - - NMI f _ ��IL�■■L-+,?��-.-ai.trctc�'/ii*�■ 1 �■:ti"' .1.7�ti��_��■�+� •■■• .ii 9...... ........�.i.�....■..■ ■........•J■{♦...•.�...�.�.i.i..11■ ta..■■■■■■■� t.r■■■■L.b:.L.■i. ....�.i.i.�.I��Y�.�...■..Ii{.�\i.�.i.�.i.�.iil'IL{L...■■■■■� �" -■■■■■c9�y,■�\1 l'Y:•'i1{.�II"I�■�L�i■1 Moo .u.uuu.nu.uuu..un.u.n.�■u..��aar��.+■■■■a.uuinuu■uuu■u.nnuuuu.uu'..uu■uuuuunrauu��.n •u�N■•.- ■r■nu..u■ou■u.■■Lv c . 1. - ■■ ' SURVEY REQUESTED BY BAXTER MEADOWS DEVELOPMEN EATE A LEGENDNow a MAJOR SUBDIVISION WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMEN . PRELIMINARY PLAT OF c FOUND 1/4 CORNER — WATER MAINS � NOTES: BARTER MEADOWS PHASE H FOUND SECTION CORNER -- WATER SERVICE g FOUND C 1/4 CORNER FIRE HYDRANTS 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE 8' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m 2 ALL SEWER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LOCATED IN THE S 112 OF SEC. 34, T. 1 S.,& SE • PROPOSED BOUNDARY CORNER S BLOW OFF HYDRANT 3. ALL STORM DRAINS ARE 15' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND NE 114 OF SEC. 3 T.2S. R. SE. — PHASE II BOUNDARY WATER VALVES PUD B(XINDARY SANITARY SEWER 4. ALL POCKET PARKS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOME — OWNERS ASSOCIATION. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, NONTANA — LOT LINES -- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE z R/W LINES O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES 0 50 0 50 100 -- EASTMENT LINES — STORM SEWER (SCALE IN FEET) G WETLANDS O STORM SEWER MANHOLES ® STORM SEWER INLETS 1 n 1 DETENTION POND/7 \` Op / t i I \ AREA: 14,2M S.F. VOLUME- 10%C.F. -��� \\ �\ M O U ag o N n 11 1 _ - -- / /' y \ `4sh?� y! a z -- ---`-N14'3;40'E lIII�IE!; IrIl�IgIlA) 'EN89'41'STE N84303 108.844s�9 o a6 m� ,ft2,15.21' ' IIIIr% zi1 - � J'rl_. 'r/ N4'31'49'E /��'jB i' t / l r ------4f 93� l'rr'• qn 111,' l / \ 1 1 1 1 o Ix B `+Btl -err L 8(L44� / R 345.00 -\l '- -- -- -.-.-- - _ ' `~ -~-- - --- a a 1 \ I �. --- - - / -- a:o i o a (- -TYP 2 PLCS) i N119'34'W (/�/!//lti�11, /� \ It N1T55'37•E I I:�) r \\ 1 i� �J / ��� ���' �---4685---- 51.87 cc . 00 IA N3929'45'E \ �� l' � ' /ji" - _ III I �� /� yI i / .(TYP 2PLCS) `_106.74 �' /\ I Q III I I / / l �'� ��' \ / 1 i��\ ♦ z, Z ��+f Ali3 O /\/ y // / y W 27'52'13'E V/ 7.57 29 _ - -- 87.85' �P 0 a /, w 3,� -asaT / - /r �\ �i/ .i 1\ l// I l•i / �� S.F. - VIr A N1-31-51-F4 '"��/ Y \� �� �' i CL 80.561 jI �LI a II1 oZ�� \��\ 11 � ! r' ice/ � � ��_- • - _ - -4689-- O W Z« W o N3'51'31'W J 100.38' F W w W cc W SHEET 4 SURVEY REOUESTED BY BAXTER MEADOWS DEYELOPMEIWCREATE A LEGEND Wa MAJOR SUBDIVISION WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOUND 1/4 CORNER — WATER MAINS z NOTES: BARTER MEADOWS PHASE H FOUND SECTION CORNER -- WATER SERVICE g FOUND C 1//4 CORNER FIRE HYDRANTS 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE 8' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m 2 ALL SEWER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LOCATED IN THE S 112 OF SEC. 34, T. I S.,& $E. ® PROPOSED BOUNDARY CORNER S BLOW OFF HYDRANT 3 ALL STORM DRAINS ARE 15' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND NE 114 OF SEC. 3 T.2S. R. SE. — PHASE II BOUNDARY - WATER VALVES — PUD BOUNDARY — SANITARY SEWER 4. ALL OWNER ASSOCIATIOPARKN. WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOME OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA — LOT LINES -- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE io N3'51'31"W — R/W LINES O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES ol 50 0 50 100 100.38' -- EASTMENT LINES — STORM SEWER [= WETLANDS O STORM SEWER MANHOLES (SCALE IN FEET) cl=- STORM SEWER INLETS ONE �y qua N ' ar ► {- o Ld �i \ \ \\ I �� tws n o a d "Lno mc �189'43'14'E`--------—- 159.91 I . - RI6E7STAE 4LOCK 14 i ► I cca a: �e 1 CL a 0 _ t - 4200 — 18,588.55 ' I--- y���. ; r�-� r-�-� r-[-�� r4 r•------ , _ , a o a g1 f� 5,543.87 4 III I I l 5,411.98 1 }\I2�64�`1 2�S2I 1.2!21 I 27721 _5_8 88 I! o S.F. nl. 1(I Ill I� 1 I S.F. I I SF• 1 I .SF. I I S.F. 1 1n SF-�F- - I\ I --- S.F L 4__S.F.---J I / I, gj)� j `\ j ` I I j L-------------� ; 1 i,l 1 \` 159.09' I --- 5 25D.00 - -� --` _--- _ III t+l tl 1!I. Ii \ 0l r--- 1r�-- L�•J J J_ \J J r------------- -1 11 �2 ly III I• _ ( �� 1i Ilil` III `4667'I - $I S 359s63- I I 1 I f I.. <` BLOCK 13 tll �I I11 10 ^ - d' S.F. 1/ L,i--S.F. I ✓ �r--.1 �"�1 �1° ��\. 2, 74 1 - LI'�, 2 O I i I d �I T---- SF. I o 1 li �1 h z i Ir---10�48---�.n rf, -- --�i ml 1 8 1 (7� I (e� `-----�; _ _ 81 19.804.92 flit ' It N Iln 1L O 01 5/ 3I3 I I2. 1z 1 ra I S.F. r• I \ act 36802 1�1I O 11 1 5;250.00 - 11 SF. \I I SF.1 I•SF. I I S.F. I :1 to = - I I rj* I 1,v It \\Q to 1 I S.F. t I !I r II$ b 1 � 't` ? 2 a I z 1 z I! d m1 10 L__J 4_J L_J..L__ , II I - I L__ J S. JII \ I 1 L,.----J� I O t 1 O d NI I T---- {- ------- -------------=G� o a m ` I -- 4 I __� > r 1 goao4 �I I/I I! ® I! O !I OOCET�PARK I 18 = - t78.38' ,� W 01 Is,a42 I,I b 1111 5.250.0o I$ IZ � 43s.27's , b I '-2. z I,� _ ir-------------=I'�t� 3 91 ! S.F. I coI II S.F. I� ! W ;I \ NL__ J vL_ SF_J< jll_-_ rn i/ `1 j �d L_T___.___1J f L..II i I I. Z Q $r Y r I• ! b1 5 1 II g I _NIc J J 1 4 2 2 �$ - Ix - j oo ,! I o ® I I I of 19,924.30 x' ! cl i j 5.444.72 I M I _J 1 1 I 5,250.00 , , J-L. S.F. I I {�� ,C I a y .Qil I SF. i I Q 1111 .S.F. - O I' Q"r- 1. Q .I / 1 Vtl' ( ' 1 W W r�--909 8- 'r tI I5� 1I i1 o I"I(\ 10 = -Q 11\ // ICI H ! L, rr/ 1 4ah3 0 2 I`� j L--------------- j I Q = J 813`SF2� SF. i '.� 1 j L,F���Y I It J 5,460.03� II I 1I 5 2U1.71 _. I�c- SF. It87.2Y _ R SF. l�y ILLL .- rl _ I_ I__�,I - - NF----- --- --t1 W d _ 1 I m r---98,75-t- 2SF.12 I+ Jl1 R - 17 P I y I 0 _ z, [o _ _ - J e- �,9. 44 1 I II �o I rL F "4 ; a `_� — �. =� __ - - - \ ��1 21,55116 I I m 7 I I 1 Q y-4i l ! - t y� I_ L. G I ® S.F. 10.S.F., .15D.9 13.'024 13,ltiEl j I 1,3 I -241 1 3,241 13. 4 �i.750.34 / - I \\ R - 8800 v I 1 [ 11 I O ', iSF. S.F. SF. SF. \ - - t1.0T- ------ 1/ i S.F. I I S.F.,I -� 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 S.F. I 1 - I e- 28729' 1 1, t a L____J___J L__J L__J L_ Jcr ti L__J L_-J L__J L-�J_1-__J ` 107t/9' �4200' 14200 Y `1 J- I � - 1 \ II S89'41'S7' t II r •1390\11 \ L- &Sr 1 i `� 1' q 90. 1 �1 \ iI \ R- 17.5O5i \ / f EQUESTRIAN WAY(1 OX R/W) e- 28-&9 L- 3268 ' - 11.0T ! Ali L a a Z J F W W cc W m IL SHEET 5 LEGEND t-A SURVEY REQUESTED BY BAXTEP MEADOWS T DEVELOPMENT. CREATE A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF =• FOUND 1/4 CORNER - WATER MAINS MAJOR SUBDIVISION WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. d FOUND SECTION CORNER -- WATER SERVICE IL NOTES: BARTER MEADOWS PHASE // � FOUND C 1/4 CORNER FIRE HYDRANTS 1. ALL WATER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • PROPOSED BOUNDARY CORNER A BLOW OFF HYDRANT D 2 ALL SEWER MAINS ARE 8'UNLESS OTHERNISE NOTED. LOCATED IN THE S 112 OF SEC. 34, T. 1 S.,R. 5E. - PHASE II BOUNDARY ee WATER VALVES a ALL STORM DRAINS ARE TV'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. AND NE 114 OF SEC. 3 T. 2S., R. 5E. - PUD BOUNDARY - SANITARY SEWER 4. ALL WNS ASSOCIATION. WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOME OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA - LOT LINES -- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE o 50 0 50 100 - R/W LINES O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES IA EASTMENT LINES - STORM SEWER C WETLANDS O STORM SEWER MANHOLES (SCALE IN FEET) 9=3 STORM SEWER INLETS N89'43'14'E _ ; 1 799 96• ao �- �cweaaR� r--•,, -.� _ - --- - - - - L _JS00'2059'WTrrrrrm L L JIL � JL -J , o o o I tV I = �' a �{ N C4 2: CL -SS SST\ _ _ -c I I I I. I 4• _1 .I '�I _.I .t _ J1 _ , / �rl c> n -_-M-� - \\ ^� 35 S- 00 oI. m M l \ - r -+ 87.00 83. -- 83 e3.00 -\ I sa 99. 3 t \ 0 tom 8 �-i i------i r-�- r- \ t I I II i 1 I \ o } ----- r-------1r---------1r--------- r-------�' - m8 Cr I t \ I 1 I / I I I I I I I CL �' a I I I, I o 1 1 11 I J I 1 W I- 77 "� 1 �I o8 1 I �0 9 1 I -�r® �I '� 1O1 i Q ro 5 10 8 M I 1 am i 0 a 8,678i01 I 8,238.96 I "8,199.83 I 8,160.71 'I q,/ 9,480.48 \ 6,0311701 1 �n I'"-9,648.021 j I�� 9,635.71 I ! 9,333.08 j3 ', . 9,5Q9.83 �j� I I S.F., 1 I �` S F. I I S.F. I I S.F. I I J S F. /_ I I S.F) I I I S.F. I I F I S.F: I I S.F. I j I `S.F. ' I" a 4 rr \ 1 ' + J I L--------J L-- ', I I.'I�I 0 o f � I i-! I I��'� I I•✓ / I I� Ll �.I '� {J �--•� '� �`I I � I `L_I �. -- o', I L-----`- ------- _J I_------=� 14` a 1 r--------i -- r----- r---------1r---------1 f--------- I 3 Nino �,4 Ot '��5!4 4� 1�48rr 4 4 045F/I 64o 006. 9,2 4 8,14 9, 8 .39 b, 641 9 3)oo9 I F.8,6 , L / ?t7 IS.F. S.F.-J S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. L_S.F. 'S.F. �- S.^ 9 II I I I I � /t )LJ------- L-----�`J L--------J --- L----�I--J L--------J L---- _J L-------GO, -t / - - r __. I -- I _ c----- C-- ---- ----- 2 1 I 1 1 WERE WERE r----=--� r ------�. r------- r------ ------� r--4---� r------, r----, -, }-------, r-i--- I----- i; y W I i 1 1 \ I \\ I I f,1 I."ram I I I � " I 1�r 5 r I I s��I I o7 I I '� Q8 .�I I Q9 I I� Qo I I 1Q1 1 I 1• !W y j II 11 1 N 1 1 `�I 1 2 1 3 �I I ' I \ I I �� 1 7,470.00 I IJ 7.47f1.00 1 7.470.00 7.4'70.00 7.920.dQ t�) \� ` a o Q o I� �Q4 1 t 7,4 00 17,4 00 I t I L ! 7,920.00 7.4/LI•00{ I �7.470.00}I 7,470.00 1 S.F. �1 S.F. �1 \)S. B K 9 5. I F +` S.F. ! I I +S� I I S.F. It i II 1 lam L S.F. 1 \\ S.F. 14 LF�4`-1 T. L �1 d W \- N 0'11', IL�- --J L -J L-- -�\L-- �:J' \ L--83604-J L--e7eO`--J L-- -J -- -J L--83eD--J L--B360t--J L__ -� y - - `\ 955:46' - - 11 .11 .� `----- U 4 T E LINO 6 DFDIOA71ENk THENCE NORTH 6C41'ST EAST.W9 FEET; I US UNTO BE NNEMDSURVEYED. PR D.SUB IVIDEDONNER DO HEREBYTE CE TO LOTS,TUT I NAVE THENCE SOUTH 00%XT0.T EAST.W7.03 FEE; W STREE ro D THER ED ONS AN ED AND RETIED SH WNB BLOCKS AID THENCE NORTH 0006'S9'EAST.657.0.E FEET IL HEREUNTO AND UDE.THE POLL AND DEDICATIONS,AS SHOWN BY 71E PUT THENCE NORTH EY•41'2Y EAST.147.13 FEET. a IEREU7T0 MOWED,THE FOLLOWING TRACT CE IAVID.ro Wrr: THENCE NOLNTH 00'I1'26'EAST.S13JD FEED, L NS UNDO THE DESCRIBED P•L OR ENCUMBRANCER.OUR DO HEIVE L JOINM N HAD y THENCE SOUTH 69'41'57'EASE.140.53 FEET; CONSENT ro THE DESGHaa RAT,RELEASING OUR RESPECRVE LiNS aAINs lwosm�N rw ►Alarm wl x�wna°:o.il.moo x TOWNSHIP SITLIATED IN sOUTI RANGE 6 PEwSL 1LEL AND THE NORTHWEST 1 4 OF CONTAI THE SOM 1/1 OF SCCTKM 34, THENCENING NG 75 00 ACRE EAST.ND.MORE FEET L S,ALL A OF�N ON T OR ENCUMBRANCES AS TO ANY POT7=OF SAID LANDS NOW BEAD RATTED MAMo PAN AREA AM�e OOINTANNO 76.04 ACRES OF LAND.YOE W LESS ALL AS SHOWN pl THE eH+oeAL v STwe AND Cos WASH 7I��MDDI Na1eaM v ammm 7*+VO)KGA. ATTACHED DRAWINGS MACH ARE HEREMTH INCORPORATED N AND MADE A PART Nro STREETS AVENUES.PLANS,W OTER PUBLIC USES EW9GH ARE an MISNOMER a Om awmT To SANITARY 1011CNR SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH•RANGE 3 EAST.PALAL.GALLA/N DEDICATED ro THE Cm OF BOZENAN FOR THE PUBLIC USE AND ENJOYMENT. MONTANA AND BEING PART OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 AS CONVEYED ro WJL6.LP. OF THIS tEIrIL DESCRIPTION AND 6 51lB�EC.T ro ALL FA5ELE175 AND Iatans OF Nos mIMEN CAN OF DEED RECORDED ON JRLY 17,2000.DOCUMENT NUMBER 20163q RECORDS OF WAY OF RECORD. amaa ca R SOIaOMa MY GALLATN COUNTY.MONTANE SEEING MOM PARTAIRA RLY DESCRIBED AS EADONTS FOLLOWS AA YONTANA LYIED PMRTER9HIP Yart�AWPM A IMPS rNkpNpNlam�NmANUea COMMENDING AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SAD SECTION 3k IOMON�w Wm �AWa�M�rAoow Nua[:M2®I�aauN w Garar/wa WIN x THENCE PHASE TM2; �W EAST.750.93 FEET TO THE PENT OF BEQNIG THE ABOVE TRACE W VOID s ro IOIONI ND OE90UTFD As BA%IFR FOR MEADOWS SUBOIM IO,PHASE 2.CITY CF BOZEMAN.GALLATN COUNTY. T x wMOIQII HART wMMAwD Awn DEFISa w USE OPWAUNo FOR A Nam OF ONE WAR THENCE SOUTH 6P41%r WEST.4=73 FEET. MONTANE AND THE TRACTS INCLUDED IN ALL STREETS AND ALLEYS,AVOW)FS �.• Nd INS DATA RE NOIAALAIM INS WOHmI ORNATEAd®el OF AM Nea M.MATMaR7NM McIIwOBfY 10 x an vM�AIa AND x an MOMENT A®EN M Rsw a ALL,NOIRE THENCE SOUTH 009COY EAST.1104.48 FEET. AND PARKS OR PUBLIC SQUARES.SHOW ON SAD PLAT ARE HEREBY GRANTED cc GRALD R WWAl13, PRESEM MMRA1MAreNNe NelI0M9ANR wIW6T 10 x AWC IMAM-AnT, THENCE ALONG A 201.73 FOOT RADIUS TO THE IBOR.HAVING AN ARC AND DONATED TO THE CITY OF BOgMAN FOR PUBLIC USE AND ENJDYEER. �/ DISTANCE OF 30277 FEET; STATET Or man ) �o OF�'Q TEA THENCE ALM A 4E600 FOOT RADIUS TO THE RNWi HAVING AN ARC Z Gown v GMIAIN>a SAM WEAPONS OrAMP MMi DISTANCE OF 110.53 FEET. 'TIE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY QtAN15 LIMO EACH AND EVERY PERSON.FURY OR z w WS!Iw v Haw,WERE MC x A■Og7n Kea Nw x STATE o MORTwA A LE NOR,IAam rMDAEN!• TENCE NORTH 52T7'N'HEST,368.00 IMP CORPORATION.I NWHETHERER PUBLIC GR T PRIVATE PROVIDING E E R CETETOIO ro I fTT A Aevm T 18�® x v�m Mae w[Y wwa®m x ramM - THENCE ALONG A 356.00 FOOT WIWS TO THE FMi1T,HAVING AN ARC PROVIDE TELEPHONE.ELECTRIC POYAR•GAS CABLE 7ELEVL9OI WATER OR �w w nMaS Sono.I MIN HGOwHO SET w Iwo AID ATADm MT NOTARY REAL IM DAY AND TRAIL Nw Ame �mwe M.elves NSENmN DISTANCE CE 600M FEET; SEER SERMCE ro THE PUBLIC.THE RGR OT THE,ANT USE OF AN Mx Mama THEME MOM 447r2e EAST,M67 FEET: EASEME)ff FOR THE CONSTRUCTION.MAIII(TEMANCE,REPAIR AND SENIOR)AT Nv P.Tags THENCE THENCE ALONG A 345.00 FOOT RADIUS TO THE HEFT.HAVING AN ARC THEIR LIE D S A DINER FAC I ITIES,SI OVM A REMOVAL a ACROSS EACH AREA w M®MANOR MD am DISTANCE OF 266.66 FEET.' DESIGNATED ON THIS PUT AS VWW EASDADW 70 HAVE AND TO HOD 1= W NOTARY Has FOR x STATE OF eNHNTAHA THENCE NORTH OODCOO'WEST.191.53 FEE7; FOREVER.' w OarSSal a F F a GMU71 GDADY eepIayeA m NWT D1-MTAT x THENCE SOUTH 8P41'SE'WEST.7A75 fFED BA%TER IEADOW"DEVELDRENT Wcc a1AlIHa NAT HHEDI OAT DII4Mm AND 1TA7)IL INK IIIOONY NANO MD WaK THENCE IIQiTH 00'I8'Ol'WEST,760.02 FTtT DATED TMS-GAY d:�200.E A MONTANE WIED PARIREt9$ W A>1mDIFS A»J�AD LEM w x IAND ID a firED ARE PAID,U1D WNDI7a1 m IAOY O}RENN THAT am OR THENCE NOUN 69'41'ST 1ESf,1390.11 FEET; 2 A+o IApar,>m I swe7m WARE i AMH Mim x COON AS ItOM w x aTAn >® TENCH NORTH 0(T6'03'WEST,9JfL46 FEET. N t2111 Ra Mr ND q®D�JI lam.- SN NalOtla OF THE IIDNMN 6J01m1 AM NATa1D Eel SMOOI 7S-s•wI naatlN 7�3-M MGA ARE)x SOIDwI AMA som �ry�� 7HEIfCE M OCM8 THENCE MO BY EAST,450.87 FEET; EEncAlp OF OATMEAL ODOSTs ININTANA,oo H6OT oIY THE NCE SOUTH GO•aO'5fr WEST.566.04 FEET BALD R.'gLLIAMS PRESOprt SHEET 7HAT INSraraaM SMNSOTr SST nm�w aTNEN AT .i1RE ENT THENCE NORTH B74XI V EAST.799.98 FEET: Iq �Ms q 11Mw! D'TE v AiD Imo/®w v 11A7t a IAQ ItDOtl STA=o YNNN ) a x�iMmooa OMIA7w NOSH.wrt_wHA TWICE NORTH 073t'31'WEST.100.36 FFYT, mwHr v auA1w 119 pK HI®IM MeaY1A DO H470Y mmT THAT x as. -- -Sm.I THENCE MOM M M'31'FAST.MW FEET: a WdDAT o aDA oae IC x eMDDmHm A NOTARY Neue Nw x STATE v MMRANA AmaDM1a10 TUT MAi®I OILY GAIMm AND Ila LORD x CALM 7D OaMAsr m HAi AIWII010 gal AND MENamH THECE WRTH 2TS713'EAST,Q7.65 FEET; AaOw11 A/RARED xAMp�pa McDMI m e A e x TOaDe wo!TIN[■MaTD®m x MkNO % 0.AMC, Acme x REwuTOI m Se CITY v Sa®HAM Ta Nos use v Aw AIo Au IANIs THENCE IDRIII 39'29'46'EAST,f 00.74 FEET: wsweTr Aso AODawID®10 IM GTAT THEY agree Se SANG now a tb STET AS eRle Deacll>m m MIaI u� - A THENCE MOM 17W37'EAST.51.8E FEET. aSno Snev,I HAI[HIIO1fEN SST MT MAID AND A"=MT NOTARY SATE Se HAT AND TAM NOT ATM OIMLTOI v Hale m111e DATE THENCE MORM 0119`34'WEST,IOM"FEET Ada AT THENCE MOTM 04'31'4V EAST•41.Y3 FEET, THENCE NORTH 14T3'40'EAST.IOL84 FEET: NOTARY Nate WI INS OFrartARA w osrlml�� 1