Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
638300223616077067)
NE of BdJger Dr. &Story Mill Rd. NE of Bridger Dr.&Story Mill dgefielf LLC Edgefielc LLCFebruary I I 1 i Response to Initial City of Bozeman Review: Comments by the planning staff are provided in normal test while the applicant's response is provided in bold text. Matt, This is a list of my comments for Legends II. Lanette is going to look over your submittal and make sure she doesn't have anything to add. She will forward her comments to me on Monday and I will incorporate them into a letter for you. You,Lanette and I should meet next week after I have everything. In the meantime you can call me with any questions from the list. 1. Fee for Preliminary Plat. —An additional$6,880.00 has been provided. 2. Property owner information on the application needs to include the Rugheimers. See the attached application forms 3. Two sets of labels for adjoiners that are contiguous. See the inside cover of this application. 4. 28 sets of plans will be required. Provided 5. CD with plat,park plan, aerial with subdivision layout (including adjacent subdivisions) and any pictures you want incorporated into the City's Power Point. Provided 6. Lot 1 needs to extend to Boylan if it is going to be a legal lot. Based on the size of the building 13 of parking stalls will need to be within the lot lines to support the use. Please make sure there is adequate space within the lot to provide for residential setbacks. It was decided the community center would have to go through a site plan review before receiving a building permit. Issues associated with access and parking will be addressed at that time. 7. The park plan should include elevations and a floor plan. See item#6 8. Lighting Plan- the bollard lights for the street/trail intersections,information on pole heights for both Bridger.Drive and local street lights and photometric lighting plan. The lighting plan has been modified and bollard lights have been added. See the information contained in section#15. 9. Street tree species need to be identified on the landscape plan. See the landscape plan located in section#17. 10. There should be 20 RSL not 19. There are now 20 RSL's called out on the preliminary plat. 11. Table with the requested setback relaxation identifying the proposed lots.. Is this the setback to the front yard based on address or front yard based on orientation? Will there � _ be adequate space for parking behind the garage? No parking will be permitted in the 15 0 0 foot setback. See the Relaxation section for lot summary table and the Proposed Yard Setbacks exhibit in section#12 for details. 12. We generally would not support the lot shape for Lot 35. Please provide a detail identifying the building envelope as support for allowing the odd shaped lot. See the attached Lot 35 exhibits for building envelope details. 13. The plat needs to differentiate between open space and dedicated parkland. See page 2 of the preliminary plat. 14. A letter from the property owner to the north (Rugheimer Family) indicating agreement to accept responsibility of future installation costs for paving and infrastructure improvements in the dead end road. See the attached letter located in the Relaxation section for details. 15. If the bridge is not going to be brought up to life safety will there be a locked gate or barricade to prevent use of the bridge? See the attached letter located in the Relaxation section for details. 16. Lot 38 adjacent to Creekwood doesn't make sense. It creates a strange open space pocket and it will narrow the trail crossing. Granted there is a 75 foot stream setback but it has dense riparian vegetation. The lot lines for Lot 38 have been modified to correct this problem—see the attached preliminary plat for details. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\Response to Initial City of Bozeman Review.doc LOT 35 SCALE >.20 SIDE YARD SETBACK 5' REAR � YARD SETBACK 201 LOT 35 \ BUILDING ENVELOPE 6,560 so.Fr w FRONT A GARAGE yq/3p SETBACK 20' SETBACK 15 6` • SIDE YARD SETBACK (CORNER LOT) 15' wawa HMmww,a,vaMec.Ts,rrcQc no I LOT35 SCALE 1,20 f SETBACK LINES I If / / l I PRIVATE YARD SPACE S� PRIVATE YARD FENCE • GARAGE 9�G' SETBACK 20' D TI K HOUSE FOOTPRINT E P 2,587 SOFT. 20' Doi I ` 1 I 15' o H VPRI TE YARD 155 '` \ PACE I \ I I\ PRIVATE YARD FENCE f J STREET • WLLIAM HMMALKALCH ARCHi M, NC.© ZOOS • February 14, 2006 City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Re: Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Jami: Please find enclosed a Preliminary Plat Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application. The application is in regard to the following parcels of land: 1) Tract 2 of the Plat recorded in Film 12, Page 825. More specifically being the North %2 of the South %2 of Section 32, T1 S, R6E, Gallatin Co., Mt. 2) Lots 27 and 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision, Gallatin Co. Mt. This property was annexed and zoned R-1 by the City Commission on July 18`", 2005. The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision was created through several months of site specific studies and planning to create a layout that fit within the landscape and site • constraints of the property. A primary goal of the subdivision was to preserve the Bridger Creek stream/riparian corridor and create a pedestrian friendly community where each lot has reasonable access to the creek corridor and trails. A total of six neighborhood meetings have been held to gather input from the adjoining property owners. Their primary concerns were for the preservation of the stream/riparian corridor along Bridger Creek (we have 32% of the total property preserved in either open space or park along the creek corridor), provide pedestrian access from the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel lots to the creek corridor (see the preliminary plat for north/south green corridors leading to the creek), provide a dedicated public access to the back of their lots (a 30' dedicated public right-of-way has been provide along the entire south boundary), and provide water and sewer mains in the south boundary alley in case their septic systems/wells were to fail (water and sewer mains will be installed at the expense of the project even though the engineering department indicated this would not be required by current code). The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision layout has the following design amenities: • Of the total 57.29 acres contained within the subdivision, 23.68 acres has been set aside as either park or open space. That is over 41% of the property designated either open space or park land. The subdivision park requirement is 4.04 acres; the proposed subdivision is dedicating 4.35 acres. The subdivision open space requirement is 3.50 acres; the proposed subdivision is dedicating 19.33 acres. • 8,833 LF of trails or pedestrian walkways. 4,657 LF along Bridger Creek, and • 4,657 within the interior of the proposed subdivision • • Our Master Park Plan calls for a soccer field to be constructed within "Legends" park. • Our Master Park Plan calls for children's playground equipment to be constructed within"Legends"park. • Our Master Park Plan proposes a public restroom facility to be located within "Legends"park. • The UDO requires that all PUD's must have at least 20 PUD points. Our development proposal has 110 points (see the Land Use Computation section for details). 18.42.180 Provisions of Affordable Housing The current UDO regulations require that 10%of the net buildable acreage contained with the proposed subdivision be designated Restricted Size Lots (RSL's). The following is our proposal to meet the affordable housing requirements: Net Buildable Acreage = (Net Lot Area—HOA clubhouse lot—i.e. Lotl) = 954,431 SF RSL's acreage required: (Net Buildable Acreage) (10%) = 95,443 SF RSL's provided= (20) -5000 SF RSL's have been designated on the pre-plat for market sale. • 18.74.030 Completion of Improvements Under UDO section 18.74.030, b. Completion Time for Subdivisions - We are formally requesting option(2). We would like the ability to enter into an improvements agreement guaranteeing the completion of the infrastructure improvements if necessary. The submittal includes (28) copies of the PUD Preliminary Plat Application, and a check in the amount of$11,055.00 for the subdivision review fee. We look forward to your review of the Legends @ Bridger Creek II PUD Application. If you have any questions or comments you can contact me at matte@landwc.com or call 570-8248. Sincerely, Land West Consulting, LLC MaA Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager C:\Documents and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\Letter to Planning.doc • • 00 Ozw • m m 4O LEGENDS AT BRIDRR CREEK II • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Title 1. Development Review Applications / Adjoining Property Owner List / Platting Certificate 2. Applicant Information 3. Land Use Computations 4. Responses to Pre-application Submittal Review Comments 5. PUD Design Objectives & Criteria 6. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Goals & Objectives 7. Relaxations 8. Rationale Behind Assumptions and Choices • 9. Statement of Design Methods to Reduce Energy Consumption 10. Project Schedule and Phasing 11.HOA Clubhouse Site Plan 12.Miscellaneous Exhibits 13. Viewsheds 14. Preliminary Plat 15. Lighting Plan 16. Covenants / Design Guidelines /Articles of Incorporation 17. Master Park Plan 18. Community Letters 19. Cross Sections 20. Construction Route Map 21. Subdivision Perimeter Treatment SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SUPPLEMENTS Title A. Flood Plain B. Groundwater C. Phase 1 D. Soils E. Wetlands F. Weed Management Plan G. Wildlife • H. Cultural Resources I. Agricultural Water Use J. Water and Sewer Design Report K. Grading and Drainage Plan L. Traffic Study/Approach Permit M. Parks and Recreational Facilities N. DEQ Exemptions r � • 0 CITY OF BOZEMAN -• "' m DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 ., 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION D l �'✓l r- 1.Name of Project/Development: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision �u u L_ n nr. I ANDCbmMl 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Edgefield,LLC (see also Applicant Info. Section) E-mail Address: jpm@browns c'apttal:net Mailing Address: 430 N. Ryman,2nd Floor,Missoula,Mt 59802 FEE Phone: (406)541-9000 FAX: (406)541-9001 AND COMMMi NTCF PLANNING 3.Applicant Information: Name: Same as above E-mail Address: • Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: Land West Consulting,LLC E-mail Address: matte@landwc.com Mailing Address: 2135 Charlotte Street,Suite 1B,Bozeman,Mt 59718 Phone: (406)556-5868 FAX: 5. Legal Description: Tract 2 of The Plat Recorded in Film 12,pg. 825&Lots 27 &28 of the Mt. Baldy Subdivision 6. Street Address: n/a 7. Project Description: A 127 Lot Major Subdivision 8. Zoning Designation(s): R-1 9. Current Land Use(s): Agricuture F10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Residential Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ i r CITY OF BOZEMAN am DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PD il u e.tau� I 1.Name of Project/Development: ----- � DEPAR7,wNT Pr o L AND COAIMUM IY DL A 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Paul Rugheimer E-mail Address: Mailing Address: 506 Oxford Dr.Bozeman,Mt 59715 Phone: 582-7366 FAX: 3.Applicant Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: • Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 5. Legal Description: 6. Street Address: 7. Project Description: 8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): • 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ CITY OF BOZEMAN 00 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION �jLJF'y , D V1.Name of Project/Development: AND CO2. Property Owner Information: ELDPMEN7 Name: Peter Rugheimer E-mail Address: rugheimer@imt.net Mailing Address: 1404 Story Mill Road,Bozeman,Mt 59715 Phone: 585-2496 FAX: 3.Applicant Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: • Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 5. Legal Description: 6. Street Address: 7. Project Description: 8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): • 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ 0 0 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: �'E6 1 71in; i 1 DEPP.PT,%'::%' OF P:"A u 2. Property Owner Information: AND COMI-NITY DEVELOPMENT Name: Mary Wictor E-mail Address: mwictor@yahoo.com Mailing Address: 408 208th Ave. NE,Sammamish Wa 98074-6959 Phone: 425-836-9819 FAX: 3.Applicant Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: • Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 5. Legal Description: 6. Street Address: 7. Project Description: 8. Zoning Designation(s): 9. Current Land Use(s): • 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ 0 0 11. Gross Area: Acres: 57.29 Square Feet: 2,495,622 12.Net Area: Acres: 22.00 Square Feet: 958,187 • 13. Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a ✓❑ No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ✓❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑ D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑✓ T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑ I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z.Zoning Variance • ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 81/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Ovmer's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) Jan 03 2006 6: 03PM B ST0[iE#1CAPITOL 406 9001 p. 2 I' • Acres: $ ware 17ect: 12.Net Area: Acres: Square �e4: ! 11.ass Eitea: � L I � E3.is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? Yes,answer question 13a ® No,go to soon 14 j i e �13a.Which OverlayDisWct? !t�:i�o [� Nesvh6arhood Cc�nsersat�n ® Etatapwap mdor 14.Will this application require a deviation- ( Yes L3 No 15.Application Type(please check all that apply) ®O.Planned Unit Development—Concept A.Sketch Plena for Regulated Activities in Fwgvlaied Wetlands P.Planned Unit Development-Preliminary I an [3B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Developmernp-,e-9(?/91 Site �Q.Planned Unit Development-Final Plan I �! [3 C.Amendsamt/Modification of Flan Approved On/A£t a:9/3/91 P..Planned unit Development-Master Plan i 1).Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA Subdivision Pre-application � E.Special TornpormT Use Permit T.Subdivision Prel-ninary Plat II F.Sketch Playa/COA U.Subdivisic,Final Plat II� 13 G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification.cf Use V.Subdivision Exemption 1313.PreRminaty Sate Plan/COA W.Annexation [3 I.Pre m;nare Site Plan ]S.Zoning Map Amendment I'I �.J.Preliminary Mastex Site Plan Y.Unified Developmen.Ordinance Teat Atrli dment • El K.Conditional Use:Peanait Z.Zoning variance ail li L.Conditional Use Permit/COA AA.Growth Policy Yiap Amendment M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal BB. Growth Policy Text Amendment N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal Other This application must be accompanied by the app.,rupoate check-h5t(s),nazaaber of plans or plats,adjoiner information 4 materials,MIA:fey (sec Development Review Application Requisem-r.0 and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper ni t smaller t@gana 91/- b7 11-incltzs or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into€. dividtW acts no larger than 91A-by 14-inches. If 3-ring I nders-%via be used, they mma mdAde a table of contents and tabbea dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm ei ny Tuesday. application must be sued by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if diferent)before the submittal will be i xxpted. As indicated by the signature(s) below,the applic.aat(s) and propPrtp owner(s) submit thu application for review u der the terms awl, provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is firoher indicates.that any woA undertaken.to complete a develop "t,approv a by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with th .,egui:n--rents of the Bozeman Municipal Code and an,special con ons establisl)cd by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge tha ae City Ias an L-npact Fee Program and impact fees may be assesses for my project, I(sae)hereby certify that the above inforxaatim s'-t-ac aril corns.c to;ne best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature. Date: / �0 AG w._ [ .t'splApp➢icant"s Signature- __ Dates I _ i Property Osvaer's Signature: _ tp I3atc: B Propel Ownees Signature: = Date: Property Owner's Signature: � Date: s P age 2 (Detxie�semt��iear�,1ac�rioa—F'aepued to/2s/{Sf� III I I� 11. Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: 12.Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: • 13. Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑O.Planned Unit Development-Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑P.Planned Unit Development-Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development-Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development-Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑Z.Zoning Variance • ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terns and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: • Property Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application-Prepared 11/25/03) 0 0 11.Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: 12.Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: • 13.Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 13a.Which.Overlay District? ❑Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? To Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type(please check all that apply): ❑O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K Conditional Use Permit ❑Z.Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment • ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑Other. This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8r/a-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is fiuther indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correLt to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: iqN Property Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—prepared 11/25/03) . , • ., , f .. .. . � • �"f � • � . � � .. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST • These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board(DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following: Design Review Board(DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1: 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 2. 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or ❑ Z industrial-space 3. More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses, ❑ Z permitted service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 4. 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ Z 5. Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1. Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site 0 ❑ ❑ 2• List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ 3• A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will ❑ ❑ . travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4. Boundary line of property with dimensions 0 ❑ ❑ 5. Date of plan preparation and changes ❑ ❑ 6• North point indicator ❑ ❑ 7. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet JO ❑ ❑ 8• Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ 9. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio, FAH ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcel(s) and total site,and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ c. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ 11. Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential ❑ ❑ density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of • employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed, and total square footage of each Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist-Prepared 12/05/03;revised 9/22/04) General Information,continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless ❑ ❑ . such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the ❑ ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the budding(s) or structure(s) ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ �( 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑ ❑ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan �( ❑ ❑ complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC Z ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: • Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning OZ ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to Z ❑ ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points ❑ ❑ 5. Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site 8 ❑ ❑ 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric z ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas g ❑ ❑ C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities 0 ❑ ❑ d. Water Z ❑ ❑ e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: a. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report to compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman �' ❑ ❑ Floodplain Regulations) if not previously provided with subdivision review Page 4 Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance • with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. . The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) ❑ ❑ b. The downstream conditions (developed,available drainageways,etc) Z ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions X ❑ ❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑ ❑ topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, ❑ ❑ Z1 parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details Z ❑ ❑ 15. Exterior signs. Note — The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 18.52, BMC(Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces, building entrances,traffic areas (both LZ ❑ ❑ • vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.060.R,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previously provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ 19. Landscaping- detailed plan showing plantings,equipment, and other appropriate information ❑ ❑ as required in Section 18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required,complete section C below M Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees El Eland shrubs having a diameter,greater than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ,� ❑ ❑ jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑ ❑ structures or districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the Z ❑ ❑ • property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot 0 ❑ ❑ Page 5 Landscape Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and the ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; • and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys, utility easements, utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description Z ❑ ❑ 5. Location, height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated Z ❑ ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, including watercourse buffer ZJ ❑ ❑ strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, 2 ❑ ❑ including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or.caliper sizes at installation,heights, spread and spacing. The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking 8 ❑ ❑ and loading areas,including information as to the amount(in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ ❑ damage during construction 10. Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water ❑ ❑ features 11. A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ • 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan - see Section 18.48.060, BMC (Landscape Z ❑ ❑ Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters 21 ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade .2 ❑ ❑ 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ 19. Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 18.42.100,BMC(Watercourse Setbacks), if ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not �2 ❑ ❑ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from - exterior building walls Page 6 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ Planned Unit Development- Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and.other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site 3. A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area B. [✓� Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'/z- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms Z ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and Z ❑ ❑ • directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial ❑ ❑ f, uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the ❑ ❑ applicant h. Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria),BMC.The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require,or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated • j. Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) Page 3 (PUD Checklist-Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04) . PUD Preliminary Plan Information,continued 14WYes No N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'h- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: k. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction Jz ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 8'/z- by 11-inches or 11- by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, JZ ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls and other landscaping C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map Wr ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent Z ❑ ❑ off-.site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: a. The proposed width Z ❑ ❑ • b. Treatment of curbs and gutters, or other storm water control system if other ,0 ❑ ❑ than curb and gutter is proposed C. Sidewalk systems Z ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the Z ❑ ❑ City are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following: a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water Z ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 ❑ El. feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to Z ❑ ❑ the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the ❑ ❑ discretion of the City Engineer,a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses. The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 18.78.0501, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ ❑ under question,the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed • planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application Page 4 C. ❑ Planned Unit Development—Final Plan. The following information•data shall be submitted: PUD Final Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of . ❑ ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development 2. A final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the same scale as the approved preliminary plan.If a different scale is requested or required,a copy of the approved preliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan. However, only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be permitted for final plans. The final plan site plan shall show the following information: a. Land use data(same information as required on the preliminary site plan) ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ d. Planning Director certification of approval of the site plan and its ❑ ❑ ❑ conformance with the preliminary plan e. Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth ❑ ❑ ❑ on the site plan 3. A final landscape plan consistent with the conditions and restrictions of the ❑ ❑ ❑ approved preliminary plan shall be submitted. It shall also be consistent with the Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except that any stated conditions and restrictions of the preliminary plan approval shall supersede the provisions of Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping),BMC 4. An official final subdivision plat of the site must accompany the final planned unit ❑ ❑ ❑ development plan when applicable. City approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of building permits • 5. Prior to submission of the final plan to the DRC and ADR staff, engineering plans ❑ ❑ ❑ and specifications for sewer, water, street improvements and other public improvements, and an executed improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation of such improvements,must be submitted to and approved by the City 6. A plan for the maintenance of open space, meeting the requirements of Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 18.72.040 (Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee),BMC,shall be subntted with an application for final plan approval. Open space shown on the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan • Page 5 0 • SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST • These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No"or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Subdivision Type. ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record with a Variance ❑ Second or Subsequent Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record Major Subdivision B. Total Number of Lots. 12-7 C. Proposed Uses. Indicate the number of lots (or spaces subdivisions for rent or lease, or units for condominiums) for each of the following uses: Residential,single household `2"1 Park/Recreation/Open Space 16 Residential,multi household Manufactured Home Space Planned Unit Development ,Z 1 Recreational Vehicle Space Condominium Unit Commercial Townhouse Industrial Other: This is a test • D. Preliminary Plat Requirements. The preliminary plat submittal must include the following information. Please refer to Section 18.78.040,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Preliminary Plat Requirements Yes No N/A 1. All information required with the pre-application plan, as outlined in Section 18.78.030 ;ff ❑ ❑ (Subdivision Preapplication Plan),BMC 2. Name and location of the subdivision, scale, scale bar, north arrow, date of preparation, lots and ❑ ❑ blocks (designated by number), the dimensions and area of each lot, and the use of each lot, if other than for single family 3. All streets,roads,alleys,avenues, highways,and easements; the width of the right-of-way, grades, 0 ❑ ❑ and curvature of each; existing and proposed road and street names; and proposed location of intersections for any subdivision requiring access to arterial or collector highways 4. The names of adjoining plat,_ed subdivisions and numbers of adjoining certificates of survey 0 ❑ ❑ 5. An approximate survey of the exterior boundaries of the platted tract with bearings,distances,and ❑ ❑ curve data indicated outside of the boundary lines. When the plat is bounded by an irregular shoreline or a body of water, the bearings and distances of a closing meander traverse shall be given 6. The approximate location of all section corners or legal subdivision corners of sections pertinent to ❑ ❑ the subdivision boundary 7. If the improvements required are to be completed in phases after the final plat is filed,the approxi- JZ ❑ ❑ mate area of each phase shall be shown on the plat 8. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope is under 10 percent;5-foot intervals if slope is between 0 ❑ ❑ 10 and 15 percent;and 10-foot intervals if slope is 15 percent or greater 9. List of waivers granted from the requirements of Section 18.78.060 (Additional Subdivision ❑ ❑ Preliminary Plat Supplements),BMC during the preapplication process 10. Request for exemption from Montana Department of Environmental Quality Review as described jzF ❑ ❑ • in Section 18.78.040.K(Request for Exemption from MDEQ Review),BMC 11. All appropriate certificates(refer to Chapter 18.12,BMC) ❑ ❑ Page 3 (Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist—Prepared 11/26/03;revised 9/20/04;revised 5/2/05) • E. Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions. The supplemental information shall include the • following. Please refer to Section 18.78.050,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions Yes No N/A 1. A map showing all adjacent sections of land,subdivision,certificates of survey,streets and roads 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Map of entire subdivision on either an 8'/2-inch x 11-inch,8'/2-inch x 14-inch,or 11-inch x 17-inch 0 ❑ ❑ sheet 3. A written statement describing any requested subdivision variance(s) and the facts of hardship Zj ❑ ❑ upon which the request is based. Refer to Chapter 18.66 (Variance, Deviation and Appeal Procedures),BMC 4. Covenants,Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation for the Property Owners'Association ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Encroachment permits or a letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, 0 ❑ ❑ easements,rights-of way or driveways intersect State,County,or City highways,streets or roads 7. A letter of approval or preliminary approval from the City of Bozeman where a zoning change is ❑ ❑ necessary 8. A draft of such other appropriate certificates Z ❑ ❑ 9. Provision for maintenance of all streets (including emergency access), parks, and other required 0 ❑ ❑ improvements if not dedicated to the public,or if private 10. Profile sheets for street grades greater than 5 percent ❑ ❑ 0 11. If an authorized representative signs on behalf of an owner of record,a copy of the authorization ❑ ❑ J3 shall be provided 12. A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District for ❑ ❑ control of noxious weeds 13. A preliminary platting certificate prepared by a Montana title company 0 ❑ ❑ F. Additional Subdivision PrelirninaU Plat Supplements. The following list of preliminary plat application supplements • shall also be provided for all subdivisions unless waived by the Development Review Committee during the pre- application process. The developer shall include documentation of any waivers granted by the City after the pre- application meeting or plan review. Please refer to Section 18.78.060, BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements Yes No N/A Waived 1. Surface water 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Floodplains ❑ U ❑ 3. Groundwater Iv ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Geology,soils and slope 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Vegetation ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Wildlife ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. Historical features ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Agriculture ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Agriculture water user facilities 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 10. Water and sewer 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. Stormwater management 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Streets,roads and alleys El 13. Utilities j(] ❑ ❑ ❑ 14. Educational facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. Land use 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Parks and recreation facilities 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 17. Neighborhood center plan 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Lighting plan 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 19. Miscellaneous ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • 20. Additional relevant and reasonable information identified during the preapplication ® ❑ ❑ ❑ process and required to adequately assess whether the proposed subdivision complies with the Unified Development Ordinance and the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act Page 4 • • G. By marking the checkbox below, the developer agrees to allow the Department of Planning & Community • Development to send copies of correspondence to all parties listed on Page 1 of the Development Review Application (Property Owner,Applicant and Representative). If the checkbox is not marked, correspondence will be sent to the APPLICANT ONLY! By marking this checkbox I agree to allow the Department of Planning& Community Development to send copies of correspondence to all parties listed on Page 1 of the Development Review Application. Applicant's Signature: Date: 2� Applicant's Signature: Date: • • Page 5 Application Type Attachments Required Number of Plans Required Adjoiner Materials Required Fee M Administrative Project Decision Zoning Variance and 20 sets of plans List of names and addresses of Same as application Appeal Appeal Checklist property owners within 200 feet being appealed Adjoiners Certificate of the site. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes addressed with the names and addresses of property owners N Administrative Interpretation Zoning Variance and 20 sets of materials None $180 for single- Appeal Appeal Checklist household;$300 for all other uses O Planned Unit Development — PUD Checklist 20 sets of plans;28 if in None $500 Concept Plan conjunction with a subdivision preapplication P Planned Unit Development — Site Plan Checklist 20 sets of plans;28 if in List of names and addresses of $1,000 plus$25 per Preliminary Plan conjunction with a property owners within 200 feet residential unit and/or PUD Checklist subdivision preliminary plat of the site. Stamped, unsealed, $25 per 1,000 square Adjoiners Certificate application plain (no return address) #10 feet of leasable non- One 81/2-by 11-inch or 11- envelopes addressed with the residential floor area by 17-inch copy names and addresses of property owners. Q Planned Unit Development — Final Site Plan Checklist 7 sets of plans None $500 Plan PUD Checklist R Planned Unit Development — Site Plan Checklist 20 sets of plans List of names and addresses of $500 Master Plan PUD Checklist property owners within 200 feet of the site. Stamped, unsealed, Adjoiners Certificate plain (no return address) #10 envelopes addressed with the names and addresses of property owners. S Subdivision-Preapplication Preapplication Checklist 20 sets of plans;28 if in None $500 plus$25 per lot conjunction with a PUD Concept Plan application Page 3 0 • • Application Type Attachments Required Number of Plans Required Adjoiner Materials Required Fee T Subdivision -Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat 20 sets of plans;28 if in List; two sets of mailing labels; Minor subdivisions- Checklist conjunction with a PUD and one set of unsealed,plain (no $500 plus $50 per lot Adjoiners Certificate Preliminary Plan application return address) #10 envelopes plus $5 per adjoiner containing the names and addresses of property owners of Major subdivisions— physically contiguous property $1,000 plus$50 per lot and all recorded purchasers under for the first 100 lots contract for deed. List and one plus$25 per lot set of stamped, unsealed, plain thereafter plus$5 per (no return address) #10 adjoiner envelopes containing the names and addresses of all other property owners within 200 feet of site. U Subdivision-Final Plat Final Plat Checklist 4 mylars None Minor subdivision— 2 digital copies on 31/2-inch $500 plus$25 per lot 2HD disk or CD-ROM Major subdivisions— 5 paper copies $1,000 plus$25 per lot 2 copies of all supplementary materials V Subdivision Exemption Subdivision Exemption 4 signed mylars None $200 Checklist 1 digital copy on 31h-inch 2HD disk or CD-ROM 4 rolled paper copies , W Annexation Annexation Checklist 25 sets of plans List of names and addresses of $250 for the first 10 property owners within 200 feet of acres plus$10 per acre Adjoiners Certificate 25 sets of written responses to checklist items the site. Stamped, unsealed, plain for each acre thereafter (no return address) #10 envelopes 25 vicinity maps,including addressed with the names and area within'/z mile of subject addresses of property owners property Page 4 GUARANTEE-(CLTA Form)Rev.02 1,.;{-��Jt1"'-ra c.�;.�.,•.G�% '"�P a�"ge_ �,4 - �"i�:t�i.,a., ��y,�F- ida "r'r+�^�r�wa�'T'�Mt�i���'H���s��si:- � .��s)�� a .�•'t�?{ It r rct� r a'�'r} 11 �� Xtf * �_ �� s �twit_ ' {—AN .c t 1 �. - v a )i GUARANTEE ( i a i SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND OTHER f I PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF ;,a dal THIS GUARANTEE, AND SUBJECT TO THE FURTHER EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION THAT NO �i k aM1 GUARANTEE IS GIVEN NOR LIABILITY ASSUMED WITH RESPECT TO THE IDENTITY OF ANY PARTY I a : NAMED OR REFERRED TO IN SCHEDULE A OR WITH RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY, LEGAL EFFECT U�,• OR PRIORITY OF ANY MATTER SHOWN THEREIN, 11� itt Ufll 5 4� \ O IIlN )I� Ft ;l �5 � Fla; � ?i irJn 1yyPtf.ttp. ` � ' GUARANTY COMPANY *- a corporation, herein called the Company, �,.. nb GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount ckti stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth f Schedule A. „t.. ,✓ i Ilr'r,�ltl? - f a � wflF �11 /' J t a �' 1 If'':1;i/� '�9"3 it ✓ 11 t s I:• f> � 5 Dated: STEWAPIT TITLE® Girl GUARANTY COMPANY � s �f }F Or� % {t ))) Chairman of th Board ��\ *•'U�9y> /� I' Countersi ned b Q:' o R ;2A f resident - 4 b 9 y ;3 �L RPO qP :< (( kav: - / / C . j� :✓/ate l� _ N: 19 8�0'o c tip 4thorized Signatory _ X n', Company :';dJ)) City,State t + � Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional &� h, f liability,or assurances other than as contained herein,please contact the company for further reformation as to the availablility and cost. I.� Sri t �"�� _ - <s •�^. �5 r '.=� �_� ,.�y��'/ ✓rl r / 4 -.- " .� Page 1 0l � ,,,: / ti �• { �� �-- _ .-�'`i *� I ifs_ h3 t��� '� s' s� -,- 4 � }"_ Guarantee G 1578- �, �.l lJ '� V i -'�` -+- �w�:x -.- � .-� r� -•- -•% S I .'r In writinn tha r:nrnnAnv nlaaca nririroc it nt P r Pnv 9090 W^—t— T—,-7'71)co —A Stewart Title of Bozeman, LLC: 1612 West Main • �.s � rt. P.O. Box 11447 Bozeman, Montana 59715 title of Bozeman 406-522-7636 0 406-522-7658 fax SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Date: January 4, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. Guarantee No. 1578-45330 Order No. 204134 Matt Ekstrom Brownstone Capital, Inc. 2135 Charlotte Street, Suite 1 B Bozeman, MT 59718 Proj # 3939.005 OWNERS: Peter Rugheimer, Paul Rugheimer and Mary Rugheimer Wictor, as tenants in common —as to Lots 27 and 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision E:dgefield, LLC — as to the remainder • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land being Lots 27 & 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision and the tract of land shown on Film 12, Page 825, Records of Gallatin County, situated in the S%2 of Section 32, T1 S, R6E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the C—W 1/16 corner of said Section 32, the True Point of Beginning; Thence along the E —W mid —section line, S88°15'40"E a distance of 140.00 feet to the thread of Bridger Creek; Thence along said thread of Bridger Creek through the following two courses: Thence S79°44'40"E a distance of 25.50 feet, Thence N85002'03"E a distance of 32.34 feet to said mid —section line; Thence along said mid — section line, S88015'40"E a distance of 137.46 feet to said thread of Bridger Creek; Thence along said thread of Bridger Creek through the following 96 courses: Thence S48045'54"E a distance of 27.34 feet; Thence S52035'41"E a distance of 108.00 feet; Thence S58041'35"E a distance of 173.00 feet; Thence S74°57'24"E a distance of 31.00 feet; Thence S87°42'34"E a distance of 25.00 feet; Thence S67054'32"E a distance of 29.50 feet; • Thence S61°15'37"E a distance of 35.50 feet; Thence S42°22'24"E a distance of 1312.50 feet; Page 1 Order No.: 204134 Subdivision Guarantee Thence S50°47'45"E a distance of 14.00 feet; Thence S75057'50"E a distance of 2.4.50 feet; Thence N74°03'17"E a distance of 29.00 feet; Thence S81°46'56"E a distance of 7.50 feet; • Thence S47°59'13"E a distance of 27.00 feet; Thence S00°25'55"W a distance of 11.00 feet; Thence S11°23'20"W a distance of 10.00 feet, Thence S42°17'01"W a distance of 16.50 feet; Thence S72038'37"W a distance of 53.35 feet; Thence S58°44'11"W a distance of 32.76 feet; Thence 310°18'17"W a distance of 11.00 feet; Thence S13°31'48"E a distance of 8.50 feet; Thence S61°47'07"E a distance of 44.00 feet; Thence S49'45'23"E a distance of 77.50 feet; Thence S64°24'55"E a distance of 130.00 feet; Thence S81°07'24"E a distance of 38.00 feet; Thence N54051'26"E a distance of 26.00 feet; Thence N33°06'32"E a distance of 82.00 feet; Thence N47040'30"E a distance of 28.50 feet; Thence N74°14'05"E a distance of 19.00 feet; Thence S69°58'58"E a distance of 15.00 feet; Thence S46023'28"E a distance of 24.50 feet; Thence S25039'09"E a distance of 28.00 feet; Thence S09032'13"E a distance of 72.00 feet; Thence S15059'53"E a distance of 29.00 feet; Thence S33014'30"E a distance of 31.00 feet; Thence S55°52'13"E a distance of 34.00 feet; Thence S78000'29"E a distance of 4.3.00 feet; Thence N68°21'42"E a distance of 19.00 feet; Thence N48039'42"E a distance of 56.00 feet; Thence N15039'43"E a distance of 18.75 feet; Thence N09005'25"W a distance of 25.50 feet; Thence N22052'26"W a distance of 61.50 feet; Thence N11 026'10"W a distance of 15.50 feet; Thence N14056'47"E a distance of 62.00 feet; Thence N33°36'32"E a distance of 14.48 feet; Thence N74°03'17"E a distance of 14.50 feet; Thence S74°59'51"E a distance of 27.00 feet; Thence S57°31'08"E a distance of 39.00 feet; Thence S50013'25"E a distance of 23.50 feet; Thence S39°06'24"E a distance of 20.50 feet; Thence S16°09'30"E a distance of 14.50 feet; Thence S01°47'55"W a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence S14034'58"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence S61°41'55"E a distance of 49.00 feet; Thence N81°26'06"E a distance of 32.00 feet; Thence S74037'12"E a distance of 24.00 feet; Thence S59°46'42"E a distance of 14.00 feet; Thence S40039'29"E a distance of 84.50 feet; Thence S49019'44"E a distance of 66.00'feet; Thence S60059'23"E a distance of 61.50 feet; Thence S69°55'18"E a distance of 55.50 feet; • Thence S72039'00"E a distance of 67.00 feet; Thence S42°38'20"E a distance of 17.50 feet; Thence S25028'12"E a distance of 21.00 feet; Thence S12053'56"E a distance of 22.50 feet; Thence S44041'46"E a distance of 23.00 feet; Thence S67°41'19"E a distance of 13.00 feet; Thence N76052'34"E a distance of 9.00 feet; Thence N58004'38"E a distance of 19.00 feet; .Thence N37030'17"E a distance of 16.50 feet; Thence N11 009'46"E a distance of 25.50 feet; Thence N17°59'47"W a distance of 32.50 feet;.Thence N02036'25"W a distance of 15.00 feet; Thence N28045'20"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence N46°39'37"E a distance of 40.00 feet; Thence N59021'30"E a distance of 31.50 feet; Thence N71°36'47"E a distance of 34.50 feet; Thence S87°08'32"E a distance of 59.00 feet; Thence S74009'02"E a distance of 2.9.50 feet; Thence S55°02'14"E a distance of 52.50 feet; Thence S42028'53"E a distance of 97.50 feet; Thence S29013'33"E a distance of 28.50 feet; Thence S50003'29"E a distance of 15.50 feet; Thence S69039'32"E a distance of 12.00 feet; Thence N89055'05"E a distance of 22.00 feet; Thence N69025'05"E a distance of 39.50 feet; Thence N58°07'09"E a distance of 76.50 feet; Thence N38°44'29"E a distance of 26.81 feet; Thence N27053'19"E a distance of 35.00 feet; Thence N40011'14"E a distance of 51.00 feet; Thence N47°35'00"E a distance of 47.50 feet; Thence N54°30'09"E a distance of 34.00 feet; Thence N74022'00"E a distance of 37.50 feet; Thence N81°22'18"E a distance of 33.50 feet; Thence S84026'38"E a distance of 31.00 feet; Thence S77°44'49"E a distance of 47.00 feet; Thence S66°32'11"E a distance of 20.95 feet to the E1/16 line; Thence along said E1/16 line, S00°09'27"E a distance of 853.53 feet to the SE1/16 corner, said point also being the northeast corner of Ed Vogel Subdivision; • Page 2 Girder No.: 204134 Subdivision Guarantee • Thence along the S1/16 line, said line also being north line of said subdivision and the north line of Mount Baldy Subdivision, N88°16'33"W a distance of 2525.46 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 26 of Mount Baldy Subdivision; Thence along the west line of said Lot 26, S01°45'05"W a distance of 323.24 feet to the north right —of—way line of Bridger Drive; Thence along said right— of—way, N88°16'43"W a distance of 100.07 feet to the VV1/16 line; Thence along said W1/16 line N01°45;44"E a distance of 323.25 feet to the SW1/16 corner; Thence continuing along said W1/16 line N00°07'28"E a distance of 1318.63 feet to the True Point of Beginning. SUBJECT TO: 1. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,.claims or title to water; ditch rights; any right, title or interest in any sand and gravel and/or minerals including access to and from the extract minerals, mineral rights, or related matters, including, but not limited to oil gas, coal and other hydrocarbons. • 2. General taxes and assessments for the year 2005 First half: $156.60 DUE and will become delinquent after Jan. 31, 2006 Second half: $156.59 DUE and will become delinquent after May 31, 2006 Parcel No.: RFH51995 (Tract 2 of Survey Film 12, Page 825) This is for informational purposes only and the Company assumes no liability for the amount quoted. No liability is assumed for errors, omissions or changes of assessed evaluations or amount of taxes assessed by any state, county, city of federal taxing or assessing authority. 3. General taxes and assessments for the year 2005 First half: $371.60 PAID Second halt: $371.56 PAID Parcel Nos.: RFH8162 AND RFH 8163 (Lots 27 and 28 Mt. Baldy Subdivision) This is for informational purposes only and the Company assumes no liability for the amount quoted. No liability is assumed for errors, omissions or changes of assessed evaluations or amount of taxes assessed by any state, county, city of federal taxing or assessing authority. 4. Right of way for ditches, creeks or canals as they may now be laid out and flowing over, along • and across the subject real property, as disclosed by various instruments of record. Page 3 Order No.: 204134 Subdivision Guarantee 0 5. Right of way for roads, streets and lanes as they may now be laid out and located over, along • and across the subject real property. 6. County road rights of way not recorded and indexed as a conveyance of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder pursuant to Title 70, Chapter 21, M.C.A., including, but not limited to any right of the Public and the County of Gallatin to use and occupy those certain roads and trails. 7. Rights of and to the public for any portion of the above described premises that may be part of the bed of any navigable stream or body of water. 8. Water pipe line crossing a portion of said premises as disclosed by Deed recorded November 15, 1910 in Book 43 of Deeds, Page 204, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 9. Terms, Conditions and Provisions contained in Deed Recorded: November 15, 1910 in Book 43 of Deeds, Page 204, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 10. Terms, Conditions and Provisions contained in Warranty Deed Recorded: January 22, 1959 in Book 129 of Deeds, Page 561, records of Gallatin County, Montana. (Affects Lots 27 and 28 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) 11. An easement.affecting a portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein For: A 25 foot trail easement • Granted to: Aspen Partners 1, LLC Recorded: August 11, 2005 as Document No. 2197495, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 12. Easements and notations appearing on the proposed plat as follows: EASEMENT NOTES All lots are subject to the following public utility easements: - 10' adjacent to all public street rights-of-way -6' adjacent to the alley in blocks 3, 4 and 5 - 10' along rear lot lines not adjacent to a street or alley NOTE Due to high ground water conditions, full or partial basements are not recommended RESTRICTED SIZE LOTS The following 23 lots as designated "restricted size lots" in accordance with the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance: Lots 41 —451 47 —48, 55— 57, 60 —62, 65 —67, 82, 93—98 BOUNDARY NOTE The North boundary of the parcel shown in Film 12, Page 825 is the tread of Bridger Creek with the SY2 Section 32. Therefore, the boundary will change as the creek channel changes. The courses shown between 1 and 2 represent the thread of Bridger Creek Based on a survey • conducted in April, 2005. No monuments were set on said boundary other than those shown. Page 4 Order No.: 204134 Subdivision Guarantee The above — described tract of land is to be know and designated as "The Legends at Bridger • Creek II Subdivision", Gallatin County, Montana; and the land included in all streets, avenues, alleys, parks, open space, or public squares shown on said plat are hereby granted and donated to the City of Bozeman for the public use and enjoyment. The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm, or corporation, whether public or private, providing or offering telephone, telegraph, electric power, gas, cable television, water or sewer service to the public, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of their line and other facilities, in, over, under and across each area designated on this plat as "Utility Easement' to have and hold forever. 13. Mortgage Mortgagor: Edgefield, LLC Mortgagee: Big Sky Western Bank Amount: $300,000.00 Dated: August 4, 2005 Recorded: August 18, 2005 Document No.: 2198523, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 14. Mortgage Mortgagor: -Edgefield, LLC Mortgagee: Rugheimer Limited Partnership Amount: $2,062,000.00 Dated: August 3, 2005 Recorded: August 18, 2005 • Document No.: 2198524, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 15. Compliance with the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, as amended, as well as any applicable City and County Subdivision and Zoning Laws. END OF GUARANTEE • Page 5 Order No.: 204134 Subdivision Guarantee Stewart Title of Bozeman, LLC, hereby certifies that the foregoing Platting Certificate shows the name of the record owner of the subject real property, together with the present and proposed owner of the subject real property, together with the present and proposed description of the property, and all encumbrances affecting the subject property, according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. The liability for this examination is limited to the fee paid for the same. Stewart'Title of Bozeman, LLC Jerry"Wine • Page 6 Order No.: 204134 Subdivision Guarantee -vaft te' 0 2407 W. Main Street,Suite 1 P Bozeman,MT 59718 e 406-522-7636 title of Bozeman 406-522-7658 fax • Brownstone Capital, Inc. 2135 Charlotte Street, Suite 1B Bozeman, MT 59718 ATTN: Matt Ekstrom A search of the records of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder and the County Treasurer show the following to be owners of property located within 200 feet of Lots 27 and 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision and the tract of land shown as Tract 2 on Film 12, Page 825, records of Gallatin County, Montana, situated in the S%2 of Section 32, Township 1 South Range 6 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Peter MacGregor Rugheimer Mary Rugheimer Wictor f/k/a Mary Kelly Rugheimer Paul Powell Rugheimer 1404 Story Mill Road Bozeman, MT 59715 (Tract 1 on Film 12, Page 825, located in Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East) • Oakwood Properties, LLC 607 Professional Drive, Suite 3 Bozeman, MT 59718 (Tract in E%2Se'/4 Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East as described in Deed recorded in Book 151 of Deeds, Page 229) Vera M. DeHaan, as Trustee of the Vera M:DeHaan Trust under Agreement Dated June 7, 1996 6800 Dry Creek Road Belgrade MT 59714 (%2 interest in Tract 7B of Certificate of Survey No. 2408) Mildred V. McAfee and Kenneth E. McAfee, as Trustees of the Mildred V. McAfee Living Trust Dated November 14, 1996 1321 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (%2 interest in Tract 7B of Certificate of Survey No. 2408) • • Rodney D. Campbell Kathryn J. Campbell 2205 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 1 and 2 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Waite H. Willmuth Linda K. Willmuth 2155 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) John H. Anthony Kathy A. Anthony 21.15 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Krista Campbell Kent Nielsen 2107 Bridger Drive • Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 11, 12 and 13 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Leslie Ann Jones 2103 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 14, 15 and 16 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Lowell R. Klatt Phyllis S. Klatt 2021 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 17, 18 and 19 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Guenter G. Schmalz Mary Margaret Schmalz 1728 Delaford Court Carrollton, TX 75007 (Lots 20, 21, 22 and 23 Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) • Robert L. Brendgard Anthony Brendgard 2011 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 24, 25 and 26 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Lee F. Hain Elaine W. Hain 2003 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 27, 28, 29 and 30 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Edward M. Makoff Donna L. Makoff 1925 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 31, 32 and 33 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Sidney L Turnquist 1919 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 • (Lots 34, 35 and 36 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) Ruth W. Miller Benjamin W. Dean Janet D. Broadbrooks 1915 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 37, 38, 39 and 40 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) John W. MacDonald Rebecca R. MacDonald 1907 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 41, 42 and 43 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) John Yoder Jill M. Yoder 1901 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 44, 45, 46 and 47 of Ed Vogel Subdivision No. 1) • • Lloyd B. Parker Eileen Parker 1821 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 1 and 2 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Wanda Lee Taplin P.O. Box 3714 Bozeman, MT 59772 (Lots 3 and 4 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Robert P Ballard Cynthia L. Ballard 1803 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 5 and 6 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Ian Elliot, Trustee of the Ian Elliot Trust dated October 24, 1996 1725 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 7 and 8 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) • Barbara A. Muller Michael M. Muller 1717 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 9 and 10 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) J. Russell Williams, Jr. Patricia L. Williams 1705 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 11 and 12 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Lois J. Zweifel 1703 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 13 and 14 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Nathan Peckinpaugh Marci Yamasaki 1616 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 15 and 16 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) • • Amy M. Thomas Kate Mchmerney 1615 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 17 and 18 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision William R. Dobie Karen Dobie a/k/a Karen Lee Dobie 1603 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 19 and 20 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) The Trust of Ben J. Cysewski 1521 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 21 and 22 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Audie Bert Collins Marilyn Rita Collins 1509 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 23 and 24 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) • Ethel I. Thies, Trustee of the Ethel Thies Family Trust dated Aug. 28, 1991 1505 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 (Lots 25 and 26 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Sherman Veltkamp Eva Veltkamp 14600 Kelly Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 29 and 30 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Rufus L. Cone Margaret N. Cone 1413 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lot 30 and E%2 of Lot 31 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Mario T. Del Duca Leilani M. Del Duca 1405 Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (W%2 of Lot 32, all of Lots 33, 34 and 35 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) • • Mildred V. McAfee and Kenneth E. McAfee, Trustees of the Mildred V. McAfee Living Trust, dated November 14, 1996 1321, Bridger Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lots 36, 37, 38 and 39 of Mt. Baldy Subdivision) Hipshot Development, LLC 410 N. Church Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lot 5 in Block 7 of The Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision) James D. Rutherford Cindy L. Rutherford 108 Carroll Trail Lewistown, MT 59457 (Lot 7 in Block 7 of The Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision) Aspen Partners I, LLC P.O. Box 1599 Missoula, MT 59806 (Lots 4 and 5 in Block 5 and Lot 7 in Block 7 of The Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision) • Scott T. Hedglin Karen L. Hedglin 2261 Buck's Run Court Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lot 6 of The Headlands Subdivision, a Planned Unit Development) Adam I. Edelman Victoria M. Edelman 2256 Buck's Run Court Bozeman, MT 59715 (Lot 10 of The Headlands Subdivision, a Planned Unit Development) Gary Quinn Mary Quinn 1300 24th Avenue SW Great Falls, MT 59404 (Lot 11 of The Headland Subdivision, a Planned Unit Development) • Stewart Title of Bozeman, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, hereby certifies that the foregoing report shows ownership of property as shown on the official plats on file in the office of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder of land adjacent to the legal description presented to this office excluding streets,highways,public open space and parks. The liability for this examination is limited to the fee paid for the same. Dated: December 30, 2005 at 7:30 A.M. STEWART/TITLE OF BOZEMAN, LLC Gv'.Lr•.� Jerry Wine Title Officer • � � • 2 • • �� u �� �� :/ :/. _.�Xv__ •a Ji �,U .� 1, _ • APPLICANTS APPLICANT: Edgefield, LLC 430 N. Ryman, 2"d Floor Missoula, Mt 59802 LAND OWNERS: Edgefield, LLC 430 N. Ryman, 2"d Floor Missoula, Mt 59802 Paul Rugheimer 506 Oxford Dr. Bozeman, Mt 59715 Peter Rugheimer 1404 Story Mill Rd Bozeman, Mt 59715 Mary Wictor 408 208th Ave NE Sammamish, WA 98074-6959 • LAND PLANNERS: William Hezmalhalch Architects 2850 Redhill Ave. Suite 200 Santa Ana, Ca 92705-5543 PROJECT ARCHITECT: Van Bryan, Studio Architects 21 W. Babcock Bozeman, Mt 59715 ENGINEER: Land West Consulting, LLC 1807 W. Dickerson, Suite D Bozeman, Mt 59715 SUBCONSULTANTS: Project Architect: Studio Architects Landscape Architect: Peaks to Plains Design Traffic Engineer: Marvin and Associates Civil Engineer: Morrison Maierle, Inc. Wildlife Consultant: Robert L. Eng, PhD Wildlife Consultant: Richard J. Mackie, PhD. Wetlands Consultant: Morrison Maierle, Inc. Environmental Engineer: Higgins Consulting Engineers Cultural Resources: Anthro Research • Weed Mgnt. Consultant: James S. Jacobs • 1 Land Use Computations • LAND USE COMPUTATION Total Acreage: 57.29 acres Dedicated Rights-of-way: 11.61 acres Park Land Dedication: 4.35 acres Park Land Dedication Required (126 lots x 0.03): 3.78 acres 18.50.060—Additional Park Land: 0.26 acres Total Parkland Required: 4.04 acres Net Buildable Acreage: 21.91 acres Open Space Dedication: 19.33 acres Open Space Required: 3.50 acres (21.91 Acres Net x 20%)/(1.25 Points/Percent) = 3.50 PUD Performance Calculation • Required PUD Points: 20 points Actual PUD Points: 110 points 100 (Open Space Dedicated/Net Buildable Acreage)= 88.22 x 1.25 = 110 points CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\LAND USE COMPUTATION.doc • • • • 4 • • Responses to Pre-application Submittal Review Comments • Planning Board—Major Subdivision Pre-Application#P-05051 - (Legends II) The following are comments and questions generated during the Planning Board meeting held October, 171h 2005. The comments have been abstracted from the approved minutes of the meeting. Comments by the Planning Board members and staff are provided in normal test while the applicant's response is provided in bold text. A copy of the minutes is provided at the end of this section. 1) It was suggested more parking be provided along the park/open space area along Bridger Creek. An additional parking lot is proposed at the end of Tumbling Waters Ct.. The following is a breakdown of the parking provided along the Bridger Creek stream/trail corridor(see the Parking Exhibit located in the Site Plan & Miscellaneous Exhibits section for details): • Parking lot located in the park= 23 stalls • Parking lot proposed for the end of Tumbling Waters Ct. = 5 stalls • Parking lot located in the Creekwood Subdivision = 18 stalls • Parking provided along Boylan Road = 131 stalls 2) Evening Star Lane and all the north-south alleys should be expanded to a minimum 35' right-of-way with perhaps 33' streets. • The proposed alleys shown on the pre-application plan have been changed to city standard streets. See the typical sections located in the Cross Section, section for details. The applicant is asking for a relaxation from the normal 60' right-of-way width on these streets. See the Relaxations section for details. 3) It was noted the cul-de-sacs seemed to be appropriate in this instance. Section 18.44.010,I. Cul-de-sacs—says that the City Engineer may consider and approve the installation of a cul-de-sac only when necessary due to topography, the presence of critical lands, access control, adjacency to parks or open space, or similar site constraints. Pedestrian walks shall be installed at the end of cul- de-sacs where deemed appropriate. The developable portion of the subject property is approximately 1,280' wide on the west boundary and necks down to 560' wide on the east boundary. This land shape does not lend itself to a grid style layout. Due to the topography (land shape), presence of critical lands (wetlands and creek corridor), and the adjacency to parks or open space (creek corridor),we feel the use of the cul-de- sacs is more than justified. Each cul-de-sac has been provided with pedestrian/ trail access. • • • • 4) The Board encouraged Planning and Engineering Staffs to consider the installation of water and sewer mains in the street/alley on the north side of the homes along Bridger Drive. The applicant is proposing to install both water and sewer in the alley at their own expense. The estimated cost for this is: 2570 LF sewer @ $45/LF= $115,650 2570 LF water @$50/LF= $128,500 Total= $244,150.00 City Commission —Major Subdivision Pre-Application#P-05051 - (Legends II) The following are comments and questions generated during the City Commission meeting held October, 241h 2005. The comments have been abstracted from the approved minutes of the meeting. Comments by the City Commission members and Staff are provided in normal test while the applicant's response is provided in bold text. A copy of the minutes is provided at the end of this section. 1) Realignment of Boylan Road to run adjacent to the Bridger Creek stream corridor on the north side of the property. • The proposed alignment of Boylan Road was chosen for the following reasons: • The intent of the layout was to protect the stream corridor and associated sensitive lands. The layout keeps traffic and noise away from the Bridger Creek stream corridor. This preserves the existing quiet, peaceful state of the creek corridor for both the wildlife and future visitors to the area. • The alignment of Boylan Road adjacent to the stream corridor will be detrimental to the abundant wildlife that uses the riparian area along the creek. If the road is located adjacent to the stream corridor there will be undoubtedly more vehicle/wildlife incidents. We have two letters from certified wildlife biologists, Mr. Bob Eng,PHD and Mr. Richard Mackie, PHD, in support of the proposed road alignment. See the attached letters for details. • Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria: "Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development?" Neither the Legends at Bridger Creek I subdivision to the west nor the Creekwood subdivision to the east have their main street running adjacent to the stream corridor. Both subdivisions have homes backing up to the stream corridor as is shown in the proposed layout. • Access and parking were the main reason stated for wanting Boylan Road to be located adjacent to the stream corridor. Our current layout provides 177 parking stalls between the "Legends" park in the northwest • corner to the Creekwood Subdivision to the east(see item#1 from the Planning Board minutes above for parking stall details). The proposed layout has six access points for pedestrians to get from Boylan Road to the steam corridor. The furthest any pedestrian would have to walk after parking along Boylan Road to get to a trail access point would be approximately 100 yds. Therefore,we feel that adequate parking and access has been provided by the proposed layout and alignment of Boylan Road. • An advantage of controlled access points to the stream/trail corridor is the ability to provide instructional signage regarding the rules and regulations for the use of the open space and trails. If the street alignment runs along the stream corridor and access is uncontrolled the effectiveness of instructional signage is diminished. • Unlike parks,there is no UDO requirement that open space have street frontage along its perimeter. • With the road alignment adjacent to the stream corridor there will be redundancy with the sidewalk and the trail. There will be sidewalk along Boylan Rd. in its standard location and 30' away will be 6' wide gravel trail. 2) Concern about how the streetscape would function with the homes facing onto the green space corridors. It is proposed to build a city standard street(31' from back of curb to back of curb) for the homes fronting onto the green space corridors. We are asking to deviate from the standard city street cross-section that requires sidewalk on both sides of the street and a 60' right-of-way requirement. We are proposing a 31' right-of-way with the sidewalks/boulevards located inside the green space corridors. Sidewalks will be installed along Boylan Road and the alley on the south property boundary to accommodate east/west pedestrian traffic. See the cross-sectional rendering located at the end of this section for details of how this area will look. 3) The Commission encouraged the applicant to consider the installation of water and sewer mains in the alley on the north side of the homes along Bridger Drive. The applicant is proposing to install both water and sewer in the alley at their own expense. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\Planning Board.doc • t � - 'I pri �n CAREEN5FACE CORRIL90P 15 5p 15 15 '0131 15 100, SCALE • 1"=25 ' Richard I Mackie, Ph.D. Certified Wildlife Biologist 2200 W.Dickerson,#71 Bozeman,MT 59718 (406) 586-8092 December 1,2005 To whom it may concern: Re: Alignment of eastern extension of Boylan Rd, Legends at Bridger Creek II At the request of Matt Ekstrom, Land West Consulting LLC, I have reviewed documents prepared by Dr. Robert L. Eng assessing wildlife and possible impacts of development of the Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision on wildlife habitat and populations. I also visited the site in regard to possible wildlife concerns associated with locating the eastern extension of Boylan road either through the development or along the northern periphery, adjacent to the riparian-transition zone. Alignment of the road directly adjacent to the riparian-transition zone doubtless would bring more human activity and contact with wildlife into that zone. Human presence and activity/disturbance would be more consistent along the Creek and riparian-transition • zone because vehicles could park and people could readily access the area at any point along the road. In my opinion,this would outweigh any possible benefits that might accrue from the roadway increasing the distance or providing additional buffer between the high quality riparian-transition zone that is now heavily used by a variety of wildlife and the development. Homesites backing on the riparian-open space/transition zone with structures and landscaping designed to minimize attraction of wildlife might present a more favorable interface between the development and the riparian corridor than the roadway. People relocating to Legends at Bridger Creek should be made fully aware that they will be living near high quality wildlife habitat with diverse species that may access the development. Appropriate covenants (CCRs) spelling out ways and means of best "livin th wildlife"in the area should be developed and strictly enforced. sp 1 tted, and c 'e • • Richard J. Mackie, Ph.D. Certified Wildlife Biologist 2200 W. Dickerson,#71 Bozeman,MT 59718 December 2, 2005 Matt Ekstrom Land West Consulting LLC 1897 W. Dickerson, Suite D Bozeman, MT 59715 Dear Matt: In response to your request for suggestions for possible covenants to limit or mitigate impacts of housing development on wildlife, we offer the following thoughts: In offering the suggestions,we should note that the loss of open space will often reduce and amount and diversity of habitats used by wildlife currently occupying the area and/or adjacent habitats (e.g.,the high quality stream-riparian corridor along Bridger Creek). At the same time,however, riparian zones along streams, if protected from grazing and other degrading use, and maintained as natural or wildland habitat,can become more attractive to certain existing species, especially birds, and others may be attracted to pioneer. • Often, species with larger space requirements will abandon or be precluded from using developed areas; others may be reduced and become more peripheral or nocturnal. Because of this, covenants or CCRs should focus on management of remaining quality habitat and open space within and adjacent to the development. In addition they should emphasize limiting direct impacts of humans, their pets, and their activities on wildlife; avoiding or minimizing developments and activities that attract wildlife from adjacent habitats and indirectly impact species; and restrictions against introduction of plant and animal species that would attract, detract, or compete with existing native forms within or in habitats adjacent to the development. Trails along riparian-transitional open space should channel human activity to locations most appropriate for such use and minimize disturbance of habitat and wildlife across the area as a whole. Within this framework we suggest: 1. Many recent housing developments such as Legends at Bridger Creek are located in and/or adjacent to diverse,high quality habitat subject to continued use by animals living in or around the area. CCRs and other documents should clearly note that the property owner is moving into a development or particular local area within where various wildlife species occur. The resident must assume the occurrence of wildlife and accept wildlife damage. Also, no individual should be allowed to undertake control of"problem" wildlife without approval of management/homeowners association or other authority. • 406)586-8092 mackie@montana.com 2. Restriction against removal or alteration of any existing vegetation, except for the clearing and preparation of building sites,construction of roads and structures within the development. 3. Restriction of human disturbance within riparian corridors and other open space as possible or practicable. This could include limiting the number or size of pets and/or prohibiting free-ranging dogs and cats in the area or in all but specifically designated pet exercise areas where animals are under owners control. Might also include prohibiting loud noise and other behavior disturbing to wildlife in riparian-transition and other open space. 4. Restriction against fences, especially tall screening fences, surrounding the development as well as interior fences around interior lots, except perhaps as necessary around small garden plots or dog kennels, etc. 5. Restriction against"feeding"of wildlife, except perhaps in backyard bird feeders that are not accessible to deer,bear, and other forms that may be attracted. Restriction against feeding should apply both within subdivision and in peripheral natural areas. 6. In certain areas at least along riparian corridor, garbage cans or other solid waste containers should be restricted to "animal proof'types. 7. Restriction of certain types of decks and other structures appended to houses that may • be attractive or provide resources attractive to unwanted(denning)wildlife. 8. Restrictions against the use of certain plant species or landscape designs that would encourage or attract wildlife use and cause problems in and around individual homes or other developments. Fruiting trees and shrubs attractive to wildlife should be prohibited. If possible, a list of"approved"landscaping materials might be included. 9. Restriction of hunting/shooting of firearms and other taking of wildlife, except fishing in adjacent stream. Please contact us if further information or explanation of these suggestions is needed. Si r y, a c and J. c e Robert L. Eng • \ November 10, 2005 1 ' LWC r- Matt Ekstrom �► 1897 W. Dicker$on,Suite D. Bozeman, MT 59715 Matt: Robert Eng, PhD _ Prior to any proposed development on this area,the well developed; multi- Certified .layered riparian zone along Bridger Creek was abruptly bordered by a mono- Wildlife typic hayfield. This intermediate zone is favored by several species of birds Biologist which were observed on the property(i.e. Lazuli bunting, Song sparrow).It would appear that the proposed alignment suggested by the city moves the 2310 major access road closer to what could be some of the riparian transition zone .Highland often heavily used by a variety of species. Court Robert L. Eng Bozeman Montana 59715 , 406-587-5373 • 0 0 Yo lQ�ai a rA 1 B. Major Subdivision Pre-Application#P-05051 - (Legends II). A Major Subdivision Pre-Application, requested by Land West Consulting, LLC, representing the applicants, Edgefield, LLC, to allow the subdivision of 56.84 acres into— 125 residential lots. The property is owned by Rugheimer, LP, and is legally described as Tract 2 of the Plat recorded in Film 12, Page 825, situated in the N'/2 of the S`/2 Section 32; and Lots 27 and 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision, all in T1 S, R6E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property is generally located north of Bridger Canyon Road and east of Story Mill Road. (Morris) In the absence of Associate Planner Jami Morris, Planning Director Andrew Epple presented the Staff Memo. Van Bryan, Studio Architects and applicants' representative, stated the application is for an infill project. He noted 62% of the gross area will be left as open space and parkland. He discussed concerns expressed by neighbors to the south and how they have attempted to mitigate the issues. The Board asked about the design of the streets in relation to the topography, how visitor parking would be handled, the width of the southern alley and the north/south • alleys, and the arrangement of the lots. The applicants were commended on the location of the park and its connection to the park in Legends I, and the straight lot lines. It was suggested more parking be provided along the park/open space area along Bridger Creek. Evening Star Lane and all the north-south alleys should be expanded to a minimum 35' right-of-way with perhaps 33' streets. It was noted the cul-de-sacs seemed to be appropriate in this instance. In response for a call for public comment, Les Jones, 2103 Bridger Drive, stated she was glad to have the alley access at the rear of her three lots. She noted she would prefer a street rather than an alley. She commended the applicants for holding the neighborhood meetings to involve everyone. She noted she has received two different viewpoints from the City as to where the water and sewer will be located and a third location tonight. Director Epple noted Staff is discussing the locations for the sewer and water mains, which are yet to be determined. The Board encouraged Planning and Engineering Staffs to consider the installation of water and sewer mains in the street/alley on the north side of the homes along Bridger Drive. • • 0 MMilssivi I0/ZY/0-r • 5 City Manager Chris Kukulski drew attention to the two local questions and the results contained on Page 38 of the survey results. He noted that he was pleasantly surprised by the responses to the questions about support for local sales taxes to help fund various activities, noting the percentages of support ranged from 58 to 67 percent. City Manager Kukulski then noted that 19 percent of the respondents indicate they do not reside within city limits. Staff voiced concern about how this might have impacted the results of the survey, but a random review of the responses in five critical areas revealed that the difference was less than 1 percent in the overall ratings. Eric Henyon observed that, during his door-to-door campaign, he has found that some people do not know if they reside within city limits while others believe that Four Corners is within the city. Responding to Sean Becker, Dr. Miller stated he will send the raw data to City Manager Kukulski in the near future; and he may then distribute it as he wishes. The City i Manager noted that the survey results have been posted on the City's web page so all interested individuals may review them, stating he feels t is important to make the information as easily accessible as possible. Mayor Cetraro thanked Dr. Miller for his presentation. Pre-application for Legends at Bridqer Creek II major subdivision - subdivide 56.84 acres Iving north of Bridqer Drive between Legends at Bridger Creek I and Creekwood Subdivision - Edgefield, LLC, and Land West Consulting, LLC, for Rugheimer Limited Partnership P-05051 • Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo forwarding the pre- application for the Legends at Bridger Creek, Phase II, major subdivision, as submitted by Edgefield, LLC, and Land West Consulting, LLC, for the Rugheimer Limited Partnership under Application No. P-05051. Associate Planner Jami Morris stated the subject 57-acre parcel is located north of the homes along the north side of Bridger Drive, between the Legends at Bridger Creek, Phase I, and the Creekwood Subdivision. She noted that under this proposal, the property is to be divided into 125 lots for residential development, at an average density of six units per acre. She stated that Bridger Creek bisects the subject property, and the trail corridor is to be extended through this site, along that corridor. The Associate Planner identified issues for discussion, including the street sections, street design, alley layout, and building orientations. She stated the applicant is proposing 24 feet of pavement for the alleys, with the homes facing the alley rather than the street. Associate Planner Morris noted that, following review of the pre- application, the advisory boards have expressed concerns about the lack of sidewalks along the alleys, the proposed cul-de-sacs, and the alignment of Boylan Road, which allows for private lots to back up to the stream corridor setback, trail corridor, wetlands, floodplain and critical lands. She then forwarded staffs preference for the realignment of Boylan Road to run adjacent to the sensitive area. Staff is also concerned about the proposal to front houses on the alley, which could lead to issues with the addressing of those homes in addition to the orientation issues. She concluded by noting the location of the water and sewer mains is an outstanding issue, particularly in light of the potential connections of future developments as well as the existing county properties to those mains. She indicated that the water and sewer mains are currently located in the Headlands Subdivision and must be extended under Bridger Drive to provide for looped • systems. She suggested that the developer could seek a payback district so that those homes connecting to the mains in the future would help bear the costs of extending that • infrastructure. Commissioner Kirchhoff identified the proposed cul-de-sacs and providing infrastructure in the context of other development in the area as two key issues to be addressed. Responding to questions from Commissioner Kirchhoff, Associate Planner Morris stated that in Baxter Meadows Subdivision, those homes adjacent to the pocket parks are addressed from the adjacent street. Further responding to Commissioner Kirchhoff, the Associate Planner stated that if Boylan Road was relocated to the north, it would provide additional street frontage along the open space, allow for elimination • 6 • of one of the proposed cul-de-sacs, and provide for additional parking adjacent to the open space. She also suggested that the realignment of Boylan Road could help with reconfiguration of the area where the applicant is proposing to front the homes on the alley. Commissioner Youngman expressed concern that allowing lots adjacent to the open space and parkland could result in encroachment into these public areas. Mr. Matt Ekstrom, consulting engineer representing the applicant, responded that the wetlands run along the entire length of the vegetation along this portion of the property; and a 75-foot setback is required from that. He suggested the Commission has no need to worry about lots being too close to the wetlands, and suggested that the boundaries of the lots could be delineated with a hedge row, similar to those found in Legends at Bridger Creek, Phase I. Responding to Commissioner Hietala, Mr. Ekstrom confirmed that the trail will extend east from Legends, Phase I, to connect with the Creekwood Subdivision. Mr. Matt Ekstrom acknowledged the public safety concerns about the proposed alley configuration and the fronting of homes on the alley rather than the street. He suggested that, to address these concerns, the alleys be constructed to the same standard as the streets, in the typical 60-foot-wide right-of-way. He noted this would also allow for ample parking and services in the standard location. He asked, however, that they be allowed to move the boulevard and sidewalk into the green space corridor, thus allowing the homes to front on those corridors. • Associate Planner Morris stressed the Fire Department's desire to have the homes addressed from the street rather than the alley. Mayor Cetraro expressed an interest in knowing what the backs of the lots would look like. Mr. Ekstrom showed the Commission pictures of the concept being proposed, noting that it has worked in other communities. He then recognized that relocating Boylan Road could allow for eliminating one cul-de-sac; however, he noted, it could result in another cul-se-sac being located along the eastern edge of the site. Responding to CommissionerYoungman, Mr. Ekstrom confirmed that they intend to keep the natural features of the site to the greatest extent possible. Responding to questions from City Manager Kukulski, Assistant Planning Director Saunders stated that when proposed development is adjacent to undeveloped land, the applicant is typically required to extend infrastructure to the edge of the property. Responding to the Assistant Planning Director, Commissioner Kirchhoff stated he feels Boylan Road should be realigned to better protect the critical lands. He recognized that moving the road alignment to the north will result in the need to engineer its southward extension to connect to the road alignment in Creekwood Subdivision, but suggested that would be preferable to allowing private lots adjacent to the critical lands. He then turned his attention to the houses fronting on an interior landscaped area, voicing his preference for a traditional streetscape. He recognized that in a condominium issituation, the type of development proposed might be acceptable; however, he feels single-family homes should be constructed in a more traditional manner, with nice • • pedestrian flow and a typical sidewalk section. He then encouraged staff and the applicant to identify water and sewer main extensions that provide for future service to other properties in the immediate area. Commissioner Youngman voiced her support for realignment of Boylan Road, stating she feels it would be beneficial for those traveling along the roadway to be able to easily see the stream and sensitive areas. She is not thrilled about having back yards and garages lining the streets; however, she does not feel it is appropriate to separate the sidewalk from the street because of safety issues. She acknowledged that the photos depict an attractive development, but finds the streetscape is weird with back yards adjacent to those streets. Mayor Cetraro stated he is open to the possible alignment of Boylan Road. He then indicated he is confused about the proposed street/alleyway development, noting the pictures did not help clarify how • • 7 that development would occur. He concluded by encouraging that the code requirements be followed in the extension of infrastructure improvements. Commissioner Hietala stated he feels the realignment of Boylan Road for a distance of approximately 600 feet could be accomplished. He then noted the pictures reflect a development similar to that in Baxter Meadows Subdivision, but cautioned that it seems pretty short on space. He then stated he feels the sewer should be extended to the boundary to serve the adjacent county residents when they need to connect. Commissioner Youngman voiced concern that the restricted size lots seem to be designed and located in areas where they might attract pricey smaller homes rather than affordable housing. She stressed that lots located next to green space corridors are typically not affordable and voiced her discomfort with that proposed layout. Assistant Planning Director Saunders asked if the Commissioners are willing to consider a payback or other cooperative funding for the installation of a sewer main along the southern boundary of this property. City Manager Kukulski cautioned that, if the Commission chooses to allow for paybacks, it is important to ensure that agreement is properly drafted. Ms. Lynn Rugheimer stated that Boylan Road is not located adjacent to the creek in either Legends at Bridger Creek, Phase I, or Creekwood Subdivision. She noted their intent is to protect the stream and sensitive lands, and that includes keeping the traffic and attendant noise away from that area, preserving the quiet for both the wildlife and those wishing to visit this peaceful area. She stated that, with the proposed design, a large park and five or six access points are being provided to this corridor, and suggested that is adequate. • Mr. Matt Ekstrom stressed the importance of protecting this wildlife corridor, citing many of the species that use it. Responding to Assistant Planning Director Saunders, Mr. Ekstrom stated that they have not yet drafted a restraint policy or limitation on pets within this subdivision but acknowledged the importance of including such provisions in the covenants to protect the wildlife. Mayor Cetraro concluded this item by thanking the applicants for the opportunity to review this preapplication. Discussion - FYI Items The following "For Your Information" items were forwarded to the Commission. (1) E-mail from Krista Palagi, dated October 14, forwarding her resignation from the Historic Preservation Advisory Board. (2) Invitation from the Montana Transportation Commission to attend their upcoming meeting scheduled for 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 1. (3) Memo from Gallatin County to attend the mental health stakeholder meeting scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 25. (4) Memo from Jody May, 4690 Sourdough Road, dated October 21, • expressing concern about the Commission's recent decisions regarding use of its landfill. • 1 I E • f 5 E • � . • • o PUD Design Objectives & Criteria Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria Following is a review of the relevant objectives and criteria pertaining to All Development as provided in the Uniform Development Ordinance Section 18.36.090.E.2.a. The italicized text paraphrases the design objectives and criteria presented in the UDO. The applicant's response follows in bold text. (1) Does the development comply with all City design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways, sanitary supply, irrigation companies,fire protection, electricity,flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Yes. Water and sewer are connected to the City's distribution and collection system; all dry utilities (gas, phone, power) will be implemented with standard installations; storm drainage will be conveyed and treated via curb and gutter and retention/detention ponds; all trails will be constructed to City standards; irrigation for the park and open spaces will be approved with the Master Park Plan; no permanent construction or disallowed uses will take place within the 100 yr. flood plain; the subdivision has been annexed and is within the City's fire district. Streets / Alleys — City standard streets and alleys are proposed. The applicant is • asking for a relaxation the from the normal 60' right-of-way width on a portion of the local streets. See the Relaxations section for details. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Yes. The Bridger Creek Corridor will remain in its natural state. The corridor will be protected by the stream/wetland setbacks (75' for Bridger Creek) and the location of the park in the northwest corner of the property. Of the 57.29 total acres, 23.68 acres will be contained in the creek corridor / park. That is over 41% of the entire parcel. The creek corridor will be enhanced with trails and landscaping to provide a pedestrian corridor reaching from Legends I Subdivision to the west to the Creekwood Subdivision to the east (see the Master Park Plan for details). (3) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulations, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient,functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development? Yes. The subdivision was planned to create a functional, organized, and cohesive planned unit development. There are three points of ingress and egress from the subdivision allowing freedom for traffic movement. An extensive system of trails, sidewalks, and bike paths will connect the adjoining subdivisions to the east, west, and the south. The design promotes the pedestrians' ability to easily access the • park and stream corridor from all reaches of the project. • (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; andlor use of renewable energy sources; etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Yes. The design layout promotes the pedestrians' ability to easily access all portions of the project from any location within the project. The curvilinear layout of the roads actually requires less paving than a grid layout serving the same number of lots. These aspects will contribute to the overall reduction of energy use for the project and the community as a whole. (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize privacy by the residents of the project? Yes. Our proposed layout of homes fronting onto open space will help create neighborhoods within the Legends II overall neighborhood. This will help facilitate a sense of privacy on a block by block basis. Lots that abut open space or park land will have landscaping to delineate the private property from the common space. This landscaping will create a privacy barrier without requiring fencing. (6) Park Land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of • park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by Section 18.50.020, BMC? Yes. The required park land per dwelling unit has been meet and exceeded (see the Land Use Computations section for details). The park and stream corridor have been arranged to allow public access to all the amenities within (i.e. soccer fields, trails, playground equipment, benches, restroom facilities, etc...). (7) Performance. All PUD's shall earn at least twenty performance points. Non-residential developments within the North 19`h Avenue/Oak Street corridor shall earn thirty points. Points may be earned in any combination of the following. The applicant shall select the combination of methods but the City may require documentation of performance, modifications to the configuration of open space, or the assurances that the options selected shall perform adequately. (a) Provisions for affordable housing: Two points for each percent of constructed dwellings in the residential developments which are provided by donation or long term contractual obligation (20 year minimum) or with donation to an affordable housing agency, or other similar means; OR — One point for each construction dwelling or lot donated to the City for affordable housing provided for by a non- residential development with appropriate assurances of its qualifying affordable status; (b) Additional open space: One point for each percent of the project area that is • provided as non-public open space; or one and one-quarter points for each 9 0 • percent of the project area that is provided as publicly accessible open space. The portion of the project to be considered in determining the size of area to be provided for open space shall be the gross project area less areas dedicated and transferred to the public, andlor used to meet the parklands requirements of(6) above. The area provided for open space shall be exclusive of yard setbacks on individually owned lots and interior parking lot landscaping, and subject to the performance standards of Chapter 18.50, BMC. The area may be provided through a combination of one or more of the following means: (i) Open space within the project boundaries and commonly held by the property owners association for the use of the owners, residents, and their guests; (ii) Open space within the project boundaries and developed as usable recreation space with a corresponding public use easement; (iii) Outside of the project boundaries as an addition to an existing off-site park adequate in location and size to meet the recreational needs of the resident; or (iv) Cash-in-lieu of open space subject to the standards of Section 18.50.030, BMC. Yes. The project achieves at least 20 performance points through the use of open space. The performance point calculations are provided in the section entitled Land • Use Computations. With the exception of the residential lots defined on the plat, the park, and the public rights-of-way, all lands within the subdivision will be owned and maintained by the Legends at Bridger Creek II home owner's association and designated as public open space for the benefit and use of the general public. The park and public rights-of-way will be dedicated to the City of Bozeman and maintained by the Legends at Bridger Creek II homw owner's association. All residential lots will be owned and maintained by the private lot owners. Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? Yes. The development will be well integrated with the surrounding area. To the West; o The development will connect to Boylan Road as it terminates in the Legends I Subdivision. o The parks for the two subdivisions were located in the same area to aggregate them into a larger regional park. o There will also be future street / right-of-way connections provide to the undeveloped land south of Legends I Subdivision. o The trail system will connect to the existing trails in Legends I • Subdivision • To the South; o North / South access to the park and stream corridor will be provided to the residents of Mt. Baldy and Vogel subdivisions. 0 30' dedicated public right-of-way has been provided along the entire southern border for access to the backs of the Mt. Baldy and Vogel subdivision lots. o Water / Sewer mains will be located in the south boundary alley for future hook up for the Mt Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivision lot owners. To the East; o Street and right-of-way connection to the platted streets in Creekwood Subdivision. o The trail system will connect to the planned trails in the Creekwood Subdivsion. o The south boundary alley right-of-way will connect to the platted location of alley in Creekwood Subdivision. To the North; o A future street / right-of-way connection will be provided to the undeveloped land to the North. Following is a review of the relevant objectives and criteria pertaining to Residential Use as • provided in the Uniform Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 18.36.090.E.2.a. The italicized text paraphrases the design objectives and criteria presented in the UDO. The applicant's response follows in bold text. (1) On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project consistent with the development densities set fourth in the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? Yes. The density requirements of the UDO have been meet. (2) Does the project provide for private outdoor areas for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun, ventilation privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Yes. Each lot will have a private yard surrounding the house. The yard setbacks and lot coverage will conform to this PUD and the current UDO requirements. Lots that abut open space or park land will have landscaping to delineate the private property from the common space. (3) Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? • The following active recreational activities will be provided: • • Soccer field in the park • Playground equipment in the park • The trail system along the stream corridor will be utilized by walkers, joggers, and bicyclist. • The trail system will also be groomed in the winter to provide cross-country ski terrain The following passive recreational activities will be provided: • Picnic tables will be located in the park • Benching will be provided along the stream corridor trail (4) If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? This project is not requesting a residential density bonus. (S) Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? Yes. Protecting the natural environment was the top design parameter in developing the proposed layout. 41% of the total project has been set aside for either Park or • Open Space. 32% of this area is along the Bridger Creek stream corridor. The design layout promotes the pedestrians' ability to easily access all portions of the project from any location within the project. This will promote pedestrian travel in lieu of vehicular travel, thus conserving energy. (6) Residential Density Bonus? This project is not requesting a residential density bonus. (7) Limited Commercial? This project is not requesting any commercial uses. (8) Does the overall PUD recognize and, to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? Yes. The Subdivision will provide the final connection between the existing trails to the west in the Bridger Creek Phase 1 and, the Legends of Bridger Creek I Subdivisions, and the platted trails to the east in the Creekwood Subdivision. The subdivision also protects the Bridger Creek stream corridor and provides numerous public access points along its boundary. • C:\Documents and Settings\mekst,om\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\P,e-plat\PUD\PUD Design Objectives and Crite,ia.doc • • 6 _� Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Goals & Objectives • 0 • Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Goals and Objectives Following is a review of the goals and objectives of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan as they pertain to The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Planned Unit Development. The italicized text paraphrases the goals as presented in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. The applicant's response follows in bold text. Community Character Goals 4.9.1 Community Design — Create a community composed of neighborhoods designed for human scale and compatibility in which services and amenities are convenient, visually pleasing, and properly integrated and designed to encourage walking, cycling, and mass transit use. 4.9.2 Neighborhood Design — New neighborhoods shall be pedestrian-oriented, contain a variety of housing types and densities, contain parks and other public spaces, and have a commercial center and defined boundaries. 4.9.3 Design Guidelines — Create illustrated design guidelines to give clear direction in design and review of residential and nonresidential neighborhoods without unduly constraining architectural style and innovation. 4.9.4 Public Landscaping and Architecture — Enhance the urban appearance and environments through the use of architectural excellence, landscaping, trees and open space. • 4.9.5 Urban Forestry — Enhance the urban appearance, environment, air quality, and general quality of life through the provision of healthy urban forest. 4.9.6 Public Health — Support and promote a holistic approach to protecting community health; recognize that health is impacted by personal, social, financial, and environmental factors such as housing, access to care, transportation, and many others. 4.9.7 Arts and Culture — Support public and private arts and cultural opportunities in the community for all persons. 4.9.8 Historic Preservations — Protect historically and culturally significant resources that contribute to the community identity, history, and quality of life. The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision meets these goals. The subdivision was planned to encourage pedestrian travel throughout the subdivision. The project has over 8800 lineal feet of pedestrian trails integrated within the subdivision. The trail system will connect to the existing trails on both the west and east boundaries of the project. The park and open space areas will be architecturally enhanced through careful design and planting of local climate friendly vegetation (see the master park plan for details). Street boulevard trees meeting City code will be planted. The property does not have any recorded cultural or historic features (see the Cultural Resources section for details). By dedicating over 41% of the property to either park or open space, and protecting the entire steam corridor some elements of the historical agricultural heritage of the property are left in tact. • • Housing Goals 5.7.1 Housing—Promote an adequate supply of safe housing that is diverse in type, density, and location, with special emphasis on maintaining neighborhood character and stability. A combination of housing types will be provided though a variety of lot sizes. The lots range from 5000 to over 13000 square feet. The subdivision covenants and design guidelines will shape and mold the architectural style without unduly constraining style and innovation. Land Use Goals 6.6.1 Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provide public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work, and minimize sprawl. 6.6.2 Centers — Designate centers for commercial development rather than corridors to encourage cohesive neighborhood development in conjunction with non-motorized transportation options. 6.6.3 City Core — Strengthen the Historic Core of Bozeman to preserve the community character, economic resource, and historical connection represented by this area. 6.6.4 Natural Environment and Aesthetics — Ensure adequate review of individual and • cumulative environmental and aesthetic effects of development to preserve the viewsheds, natural functions, and beauty which are a fundamental element of Bozeman's character. The pedestrian-friendly design will create a quality environment and strong sense of place with a unique identity. The Bridger Creek corridor will be protected and preserved for the enjoyment of both residents of the subdivision and the general public. The trail system through the open space and the creek corridor areas will serve to preserve and enhance the natural features of the site. Landscaping will enhance the natural beauty of these areas and integrate these existing features into the new urban setting. Economic Development Goals 7.6.1 Promote and encourage the continued development of Bozeman as a vital economic center. 7.6.2 Support balanced policies and programs to encourage a vigorous and diverse economy. The subdivision is essentially an infill project. Developing property near the city's core and utilizing the city's current municipal water and sewer systems prevents • • urban sprawl and will help Bozeman continue to be an attractive, desirable, and economically feasible place to live. Environmental Quality and Critical Lands Goals 8.14.1 Protect the health, safety, and welfare of Bozeman area residents, and protect private and public property. 8.14.2 Identify, protect, and enhance natural resources within the planning area, and the important ecological functions these resources provide. 8.14.3 Ensure good environmental quality of water resources, air, and soils within the planning area. 8.14.4 Maintain a natural and attractive aesthetic character for the Bozeman Area. The natural features / resources of the site will be protected, enhanced, and integrated into the new residential setting. An extensive trail system will provide opportunities for the entire community to enjoy these features. The 75 foot stream / wetland setback will create a buffer that protects the critical steam corridor for degradation. Parks, Recreation, Trails, and Open Space Goals 9.9 Parks and Recreation —Provide for accessible, desirable, and maintained pubic parks, • active and passive open spaces, trails systems, and recreational facilities for residents of the community. The 4.35 acre park will provide ample passive and active opportunities to the both the residents of the subdivision and the general public. The open space and stream corridor areas will be enhanced with trails and landscaping to provide pedestrian corridors for the entire community to enjoy. The pedestrian corridors are part of a comprehensive pedestrian circulation plan connecting the activities within the project to the surrounding subdivisions. Transportation Goals 10.8.1 Transportation System—Maintain and enhance the functionality of the transportation system. 10.8.2 Ensure that a variety of travel options exist which allow safe, logical, and balanced transportation choices. 10.8.3 Encourage transportation options that reduce resource consumption, increase social interaction, support safe neighborhoods, and increase the ability of the existing transportation facilities to accommodate a growing city. 10.8.4 Pathways — Establish and maintain an integrated system of transportation and recreational pathways, including bicycle and pedestrian trails, neighborhood parks, green belts, and open space. • • The subdivision has been designed to meet the criteria set forth in the "Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update" and the requirements of the UDO. A system of trails is also provided consistent with Bozeman's 2020 plan in that it integrates east-west and north-south connections through the property. The project layout promotes the pedestrians ability to easily access all portions of the subdivision from any location within the subdivision. The project has three points of ingress and egress. This will provide future residents with a balance of transportation choices and prevent congestion in any one location. The Trail Map provided in Section 9 of the 2020 plan identifies a possible future trail corridor following Bridger Creek through the property. This trail has been provided. Public Services and Facilities Goals 11.15.1 Facilities and Services —All public facilities and services provided under the authority of the city of Bozeman shall be provided in an efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally sound manner. 11.15.2 The City shall work with other service and utility providers to ensure the adequate and safe provision of services. The subdivision is designed around the planning documents currently guiding development in Bozeman. The engineering of all public services and facilities will be developed in accordance with these plans /guidelines. Utilities will be designed to meet the future demands in the services area. Private utility providers will be included in the planning stages so that their requirements are met. H:\3638\003\DOCS\PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT\2020 Plan Goals and Objectives.doc • . • • 7 s � • Relaxations 0 • • Relaxations The intent of the Planned Unit Development concept is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. The UDO requirements for which relaxations are being requested are summarized below: 1. UDO 18.44.02A.2.—Private Streets We request a relaxation from having to build a standard street section for the following streets as shown on the attached preliminary plat: Atsina Lane, Blackfeet Lane, Cree Lane, Medicine Wheel Lane, and Richau Lane. We are proposing to build a city standard street section from back of curb to back of curb (31' see the Cross Section, section for specific details). However, we request a relaxation from having to provide 60' right-of-ways, and installing sidewalk in the city's standard location along both sides of the road. We are proposing to have a 31' right-of- way with the sidewalks / boulevards moved into the greenspace corridors (see preliminary plat for details). See the cross-sectional rendering located in the Responses to Pre-application Submittal Review Comments section for details of how this area could look upon completion. See also the photos located at the end of this section for visual examples of this proposed layout concept. The following is the justification for granting the subdivision relaxation: • Granting the requested relaxation will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to the adjoining properties. From curb to curb the street • section is a city standard street providing, parking, normal vehicular movements, standard sewer and water locations, and access to emergency services. Safety of the pedestrian traffic is enhanced by moving people further away from vehicular traffic. The proposed relaxation will have no effect on adjoining properties, because the proposed non-standard streets will not extend into the developed land to the south. • The relaxation will not cause a substantial increase in public cost. There will be no public money involved with the installation of the improvements. These streets will always be local streets serving a minimal amount of lots (ten lots). Therefore, future right-of-way expansions will not be needed. • The relaxation will not place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of the UDO or the City's growth policy. 2. UDO 18.44.01A—Relation to Undeveloped Areas We request a relaxation from having to install all relevant utilities and street infrastructure to the subdivision property boundary. The variance is in regard to the 60 public right-of-way that extends from Boylan Road to the property boundary near the future bridge crossing over Bridger Creek. This right-of-way will eventually connect the Rugheimer property on the north side of the creek to the Legends II subdivision. In order to do this, a bridge will have to be installed across Bridger Creek at this location. Since the centerline of the creek is the property boundary at this particular location, we feel it would create undue disturbance to the riparian area, and the • creek to install these utilities at this time. It would be better to extend the utilities in the future when the bridge crossing was designed. See the attached letter from the Rugheimer family 0 • accepting responsibility for the future installation and cost of the extension of Northview Street •' and utilities. The following is the justification for granting the subdivision variance: • Granting the requested relaxation will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to the adjoining properties. The right-of-way will be dedicated on the plat, and the utilities can be installed when the property to the north develops. • In this case Bridger Creek presents a topographical constraint. It would be best to install the water and sewer lines across the creek at the same time the future bridge is installed. This will minimize the disturbance to the creek. • The relaxation will not cause a substantial increase in public cost. There will be no public money involved with the installation of the improvements. • The relaxation will not place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of the UDO or the City's growth policy. 3. UDO 18.16.050—Yards We request a relaxation to reduce the rear yard setback from the UDO required 20' to 15' for the lots located along the following streets as shown on the attached preliminary plat: Atsina Lane, Blackfeet Lane, Cree Lane, Medicine Wheel Lane, Richau Lane, and the lots along the south boundary alley (see the Proposed Yard Setbacks drawing located in the Miscellaneous Exhibits section for details). See also the attached spread sheet for a lot by lot inventory of the affected • lots. The future homes in this area will front onto greenspace corridors. In the worst case scenario the closest any two homes would be to each other is 65 feet (distance includes the proposed setback and the width of the narrowest greenspace corridor between Lots 59 and 68). The following is the justification for granting the subdivision relaxation: • Granting the requested relaxation will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to the adjoining properties. No public health or safety issue will be created by moving the yard setbacks 5' closer to the greenspace corridors. More than adequate space has been provided for the free movement of both residents and non-residents of the subdivision through these areas. • The relaxation will not cause a substantial increase in public cost. There will be no public money involved. • The relaxation will not place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of the UDO or the City's growth policy. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\Relaxatlons.doc • February 13, 2006 City of Bozeman Planning Department 20 E. Olive Bozeman, MT 59715 Rugheimer Limited Partnership C/o Hallie Rugheimer—Managing Partner 1400 Story Mill Rd Bozeman, MT 59715 To Whom It May Concern: In Response to the requests made by the City of Bozeman for the Preliminary Plat application for Edgefield, LLC of approximately 56acres(tract 2 of the west 1/16 S, T1 S, and R6E), the Rugheimer Limited Partnership, it heirs, representatives or current owners agree: • 1. to block, gate/fence or remove the existing bridge that travels over Bridger Creek at the end of Northview Drive ; 2. to accept responsibility of future installation costs for paving and infrastructure improvements at the end of Northview Drive ( a dead end - street), if the road is extended over the creek to access the property to the north. Sincerely, H Hie B. Rugheimer RLP Managing Member Cc: Matt Engstrom Brownstone Capital • • • • Legends At Bridger Creek II Subdivision Yard Setback Relaxation UDO Required PUD Reqested LOT Rear Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback 41-83 20 15 93-99 20 15 111-120 20 15 'Note-All these lots face interior open space corridors, and therefore this is their front yard . � _ I \`V.iti�aV�i:V�\ � �r _ „�.�_ ����C� r ,ice"" � ., ter..," .. �I. •�.'� '\ yam` 1 � �\`�� �;��,�.. �.}yta � ' '`>4; i �F; i �.. y'a'� 'V �:� ;. :� ���� ti�a.�; , -,� .�;� ,, ,.� I . t'; �`��tir�r,q��� [� J: J.�y±�; ��� �'��,t �� �:.. �� �� ,. , :< , ::,. � �, , � �,. .'v.Y�r,Y �; ;:s� fir'_ !r.�j '� �� � � � . �- .�'�� 4 f �� ��� i � s,r it ������u (; ��� r �,' '.rust ._ ,,tip ». •T;�,q ,,� �3 t� '7•,� Thal�11� � _yam�, .!� t - H � �, ►�� i r L � ,� �7t I I ++ 4i r 1� ;ii Ili ^IU • { .- �►� raj, s s F • Rationale Behind Assumptions and Choices 0 • Rationale Behind Assumptions and Choices The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision was created through several months of site specific studies and planning to create a layout that fit within the landscape and site constraints of property. A primary goal of the subdivision was to preserve the Bridger Creek stream/riparian corridor and create a pedestrian friendly community where every lot had reasonable access to the creek corridor and trails. Of the total 57.29 acres contained within the subdivision, 17.97 acres has been set aside along the creek corridor to preserve this natural amenity. That is almost 32% of the property designated in either open space or park land along Bridger Creek. Lots It was the intent of the layout to create lots that were near open space, had diversity in size, and had pedestrian access to the trail system. Almost all the proposed lots front, back or are near an open space tract with pedestrian access to the trails and creek corridor. The current UDO density requirements shaped the number of lots contained within the subdivision. Open Space • A prominent design objective was to create large areas of public accessible open space in and through out the subdivision. Of the total 57.29 acres contained within the subdivision, 23.68 acres has been set aside as either park or open space. That is 41% of the property designated in either open space or park land. Trails It was the intent of the proposed trail layout to provide trail conductivity from the Legends at Bridger Creek I subdivision to the west and the Creekwood subdivision to the east. The trails were designed to protect the riparian corridor along with providing passive and active recreational opportunities for future lot owner and the general public. To protect the riparian corridor the trail was located for the most part outside the existing vegetation along the creek. There are only a few locations were the tail is shown going into the existing vegetation ending at the creek. Benching will be provided in these areas for enjoyment of the creek and any wildlife in the area. See the Master Park Plan for details. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\DESIGN RATIONALE.doc • • • • 9 • Statement of Design Methods to Reduce Energy Consumption • Statement of Design Methods to Reduce Energy Consumption The design concept promotes the pedestrians' ability to easily access all portions of the project from any location within the subdivision. The curvilinear layout of the roads actually requires less paving than a grid layout serving the same number of lots. These aspects will contribute to the overall reduction of energy use for the project and the community as a whole. • CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\Statement of Design Methods to Reduce Energy Consumption.doc 10 I • i • Project Schedule and Phasing v • • AT BRIDGER CREEK II Sk,EGENDS frastructure Phasing Plan/ Schedule PHASE WATER SEWER ROAD OFFSITE PARK/OPEN SPACE Phase 1 Connect to the mains Connect to the mains Construct Boylan Rd. None "Legends Park" Install the 2006 installed with Legends I installed with Legends I to its intersection with following: soccer field,tot (in Boylan Rd.). Install (in Boylan Rd.). Install Northview St. lot,clubhouse for the HOA, mains east to Northview mains east to Northview Construct Northview 23-stall parking lot,and Street. Re-route the 18" St. St.to the intersection public restrooms. Trails an supply main from Lyman w/Bridger Canyon open space landscaping for Creek into the proposed Drive. And construct Phase 1 alignment for Northview Maiden Spirit Street. Street. Phase 2 Extend water in Boylan Extend sewer in Boylan Construct Boylan Rd to Turn Lanes Trails and open space 2007 Rd.to the intersection of Rd.to the intersection of the intersection of on Bridger landscaping associated Tumbling Waters Street Tumbling Waters Street Tumbling Waters Street Canyon with Phase 2 and Midfield Street. and Midfield Street. and Midfield Street. Drive(see Install water in Midfield Install sewer in Midfield Construct,Midfield email from Street,Medicine Wheel Street,Medicine Wheel Street,Medicine Wheel Marvin& Lane,and the south Lane,.and the south Lane and the south Associates) boundary alley to the boundary alley to the boundary alley to the phase line. phase line. phase line 4hase 3 Extend water in Boylan Extend sewer in Boylan Construct Boylan Rd to None Trails and open space 2008 Rd. east to the phase Rd. east to the phase the phase boundary. landscaping associated boundary. boundary. Construct Tumbling with Phase 3. Install Install water in Tumbling Install sewer in Tumbling Waters ct.,Atsina Ln., parking lot off end of Waters Ct.,Atsina Ln., Waters ct.,Atsina Ln., Blackfeet Ln.,Cree Ln., Tumbling Waters Ct. Blackfeet Ln., Cree Ln., Blackfeet Ln.,Cree Ln., and the south boundary and the south boundary and the south boundary alley to the phase line. alley to the phase line. alley to the phase line. Phase 4 Extend water in Boylan Extend sewer in Boylan Construct Boylan Rd to Trails and open space 2009 Rd.to the connection with Rd.to the connection with the connection with landscaping associated Creekwood Subdivision Creekwood Subdivision Creekwood with Phase 4 to the east. Install water to the east. Install sewer Subdivision. in Richau Ln.,Edgefield in Richau Ln.,Edgefield Construct. Construct Ct.,and the south Ct.,and the south Richau Ln.,Edgefield boundary alley to the boundary alley to the Ct.,and the south connection with connection with boundary alley to the Creekwood. Creekwood. connection with Creekwood. • LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II - Project Phasing t <N � I � 1 t \ t BOYLAN ROAD / I 1� \\Lru f \ TUMBLING WATERS CT. MAIDEN SPIRIT ST. � A u EDICINE WHEEL LN. DGEFIELD CT. BOYLAN ROADr�""" MIDFIELD ST. - Z" LWC LEGENDS at BRIDGER CREEK II/w� m o®=n 0.0 ae w r:fW CLIENT:EDGEFIELD Project Phasing FlELD WORK•MMI pg7E;12/20/O5 PLOTTED DATE: Jan/09/2006 SCALE: DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: MEE cpRp„ECT/J9S9/0a2/ACM/PRE-RAT/PROJEt:7PXA9NGDYla CHECKED BY:MEE PROJ pLEGENDS11 SHEET PAGE OF T_PAGE Page 1 of 1 Matt Ekstrom From: Bob Marvin [marvin@enginc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:12 PM To: Matt Ekstrom Subject: Legends II Turn Lane Matt I have evaluated our data with respect to how many lots could be built upon prior to left turn lane warrants being met. This is actually not a simple question because it is totally dependent upon timing. Our original analysis assumed that the Legends II build-out would occur in five years and that Creekside would also be built out at that time (2010). If Legends II were to be built-out in 2006 and none of Creekside were built, the left-turn lane warrant would just barely be met Thus, I would assume that 100 to 110 units could be built by 2006 if none of Creekside were built. However, if the Creekside access doesn't exist in 2006 there would be more left-turns at the primary access and the number of units that could'be built would be less (approximately 90). Also at work in these calculations is the increase in background traffic from year to year and then the calculations become very complex at the same time that the assumptions become less certain. In the year 2010, the number of units that could exist without meeting warrants would be about 60, depending upon which lots were built and what other developments occur in the interim. I could state with some degree of certainty that if you wanted to delay construction of the left-turn lane for one.or two years, at least 50 units could be built. I hope this gives you some information that you can use. Bob • Robert R. Marvin, P.E.,P.T.O.E. MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 1300 North Transtech Way P.O. Box 80785 Billings, MT 59108-0785 406-655-4550 marvin -enginc.com • 12/22/2005 r-- i 11 i L.. • • • HOA Clubhouse Site Plan • • • Home Owners Association - Clubhouse The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is proposing to create a clubhouse for use by the Home Owners Association (HOA)to be located in"Legends Park". The clubhouse will be located on Lot 1 as shown on the Preliminary Plat. Lot 1 will be deeded from Edgefield, LLC to the Legends at Bridger Creek HOA. The Legends at Bridger Creek will own Lot 1 in perpetuity. See the attached draft deed for details. • RETURN TO: • Thad A. Huse Datsopoulos,MacDonald & Lind, P.C. 201 W. Main Street Central Square Building Missoula, MT 59802 WARRANTY DEED This Warranty Deed is made by Edgefield, LLC, 430 N. Ryman, 2"d Floor, Missoula, MT 59806, Paul Rugheimer, 506 Oxford Dr., Bozeman, MT 59715, Peter Rugheimer, 1404 Story Mill Rd., Bozeman, MT 59715, and Mary Wictor, 408 208th Ave. NE, Sammamish, WA • 98074-6959, collectively Grantors, and The Legends at Bridger Creek Homeowners Association,Inc., 430 N. Ryman, 2nd Floor, Missoula, MT 59802, Grantee. Grantors, for value given by said Grantee, do hereby grant, bargain,warrant, sell and convey unto Grantee, its successors, and assigns, FOREVER free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, all of Grantors' rights, titles and interests in and to the following real property situated in Gallatin County, State of Montana and more particularly described as follows: Lot 1 of The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision, a platted subdivision in Gallatin County,Montana, according to the official recorded plat thereof. in the parcel of real property described hereunder, and Grantors hereby • transfer to Grantee all of the duties and responsibilities which were created or may have been created in relation to the parcel of real property described hereunder. 2. Use of the Real Property. The parcel of real property described hereunder shall be used solely for purposes of operating a clubhouse for the benefit of the homeowners in said subdivision and the Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision, and operation and use of such shall be in accordance with the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions pertaining to said subdivision recorded on , as Instrument No. 3. Covenants Shall Run with the Land. The covenants, conditions, reservations and restrictions set forth hereunder shall run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantee, and to Grantee's successors and assigns. And said Grantors do hereby covenant to and with said Grantee, they are the owners in fee simple of the property granted; that Grantee shall enjoy the same without any lawful disturbance; that the same is free from all encumbrances • except as noted above; that Grantors, and Grantors' successors, and all persons acquiring any interest in the same through or for Grantors will, on demand, execute and deliver to Grantee at the expense of the latter, any further assurance of the same that may be reasonably required; and that Grantors, and Grantors' successors, will warrant to Grantee all the said property against any person lawfully claiming the same and will defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. DATED this_day of , 2006. GRANTORS: TZv�LA�.tr_i.c�CGIY_Y_i.C.�C i , • Paul Rugheimer STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. County of GALLATIN ) On this day of , 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Paul Rugheimer, known to me to be the Property Owner who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana. (Printed Name) Residing at: My Commission expires: Peter Rugheimer STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. County of GALLATIN ) On this day of , 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Peter Rugheimer, known to me to be the Property Owner who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana. (Printed Name) R�cidira�at:�__ V . VAN BRYAN STUDIO ARCHITECTS PROGRAM The Legends— Clubhouse Bozeman, MT 12.27.05 Interior Lobby 10 x 15 150 SF Cloak Room 5 x 5 25 SF Community Room 26 x 40 1,040 SF ■ With Partitioning System Kitchen 15 x 25 375 SF Men's Restroom 8 x 10 80 SF Women's Restroom 8 x 10 80 SF Exercise Room 15 x 25 375 SF Office 12 x 16 192 SF Janitorial/Supply 5 x 8 40 SF • Storage 10 x 15 150 SF ■ Chair/Table/Misc. Mechanical/Electrical Room 8 x 10 80 SF Public Men's Restroom 6 x 8 48 SF Public Woman's Restroom 6 x 8 48 SF Subtotal 2,683 SF ~15% Circulation 402 SF Total Square Footage Interior Clubhouse 3,085 SF Exterior Amphitheatre Play Area Patio with Fire Pit & BBQ Communal Mail Center (Covered Porch) Soccer Fields 21 West Babcock Street I Bozeman, Montana 59715 I T:406.586.4777 I F:406.586.4778 V VAN BRYAN STUDIO ARCHITECTS • PROGRAM The Legends— Clubhouse Bozeman, MT 12.27.05 Interior Lobby 10 x 15 150 SF Cloak Room 5 x 5 25 SF Community Room 26 x 40 1,040 SF ■ With Partitioning System Kitchen 15 x 25 375 SF Men's Restroom 8 x 10 80 SF Women's Restroom 8 x 10 80 SF Exercise Room 15 x 25 375 SF Office 12 x 16 192 SF Janitorial/Supply 5 x 8 40 SF • Storage 10 x 15 150 SF ■ Chair/Table/Misc. Mechanical/Electrical Room 8 x 10 80 SF Public Men's Restroom 6 x 8 48 SF Public Woman's Restroom 6 x 8 48 SF Subtotal 2,683 SF 15% Circulation 402 SF Total Square Footage Interior Clubhouse 3,085 SF Exterior Amphitheatre Play Area Patio with Fire Pit & BBQ Communal Mail Center (Covered Porch) Soccer Fields • 21 West Babcock Street I Bozeman, Montana 59715 I T:406.586.4777 I F:406.586.4778 a � • • 1 12 Miscellaneous Exhibits .... , �� 4 00 Iler ' 'ry Ali r 4* 1 i yy R ., .� ty��,+,y�'� '.f(• � .yam _R.: ' - .5..� .• ._� ... t �' �l S77C� 1 a� :k; �Y„M,•X""` f ' "t k ��� ! $ ....C;.� f►*'�. �' . I ♦� r �a - 't •�.�Sr: � I,j� ,aJ9 � y �!i�"7� ',i•AtF•i.. - ,Y -�� ''•, .� .. i� �.., • X! d• i 'R'•� r f .� 'Y .erg .'„t �; �� t, ��•_Jt,, t,. / .. .'✓. . �• ♦\.• �!' .;�7![J'�,� ` � , -irza `r , -.t.'1{t`..,,' *.• ..RktST.'Paj 4 LLI tl a• -. � • _ yt_. y.. 4 M 'IFS � C;IEK W UU i f 7$DIVII ir P—� - - � � ,\��u f .: ' '' .` : •.{:It , 1 Rridr "r'e * �- LEGENDS R R RID E •�' "� ,� '; �. � '��4 55J e• '•ei'7y,' ` ..• .'�11iry.r.y., '7c,KS •', � �� 'lt'..' \.'. •;.. M�'; � to �. - .. ^`�!'l' .\ co + f: may, Ir i�� • ��� 4r +4. ll3Vk1r. Y ."Z "���' >n, v T ... _ •_ _ 1 .,y lA 1� .'i �/ ♦ . R'•, { 'S311Lj?. Y-:;d 3'82•IC - ,, tr �.•J, '� `.r 'Y^'(Y* e b,log 'ilk 0. [� .u�(sr�;y';it �� �- � t.t y'[ _ '�,� '•4i. -��y \. } •'i• �.���— � / � . w ,:� ,, '. •'�:' '+ r fR•ak::_^`R' .:y. ,: Y',, ..1. �;.; �- { • �I_ Sri �� » z . .,� .. pop AM AV - --`'-� _ .. {,r•r• ._.�. �fir. • �7i l �• �j� �1 i• � r ` 1-'F •tt i•s � � O +�- � Br>dger Canyon Driveit Ldu,. • '! 4 7. � � ..gd'IRrt }1�ir •«'... �..•,,.�y y \!'► --.. lid'��µ. �e"'. ll sm- ¢.. �a 1,��. } 1i � ,� •+ ,� � I.. ».� /. � - .� `. � �{+ �+.�' �,a ••. l �' ,. � � lr '� `7t:•,�11 'Q7 �:_\�` ,1 _ f' ^ r . ^ • 1 7 Ali •�� �. - �.� r-• -. --- �f'y� R�'" 4 - "' i 4., A '` �► :.. ` : : �r: � � ! �7..,,.• .. ,.:T,;',>.�: LWC LEGENDS .(BRIDGER CREEK I I � 'a �e� 6. 1 •Z/. r-"', A ( l�. '..p-_� ��., {� s m a anmz zyt 4 a k m� rea ryoq sr6r r<(.q sFl s • 6, J ;A A ''!> P{i - �•.� 1 �. • L�,a l'� 'I-t;a j - CLIENT. EOGEFlELD OVERALL AREA s 1 L+► 2- -Sw .. `: LOTTED DATE: Feb/14/2006 °i(' FIELD WORK•MMI DATE:10/18/OS., DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:NIS 0 ANING NAME1 J 0Rt0�[CT/3L%/ODS/ACAD/t=7S/AISALDWr .'.�_�_ t CHECKED BY�MEE PR0.1 LEGENDSII SHEET PAGE OF 1-PAGE * .v '' L ENDS AT BRIDRER CREEK 11 4 t 't lit A E BOYLAN ROAD •Oi, r TUMBLING WA'r!*'. MAIDEN SPIRIT ST. �p4 L DGEFI61 J1 C'Ct EDICINE WHEEL LN. j • BOY AN ROAD MIDFIELD ST. # F FT z TF I I I I 1 V. gum 1 �• s. • 4. a- it 1 +I LEGENDS ��" �+• �" � :� � � � �� � �� !� �" F� I � �� �� L " ' C .+BRI DGER CREEK I I/'� ! 1 11 CUENT:EDGERELD z PLOTTED DATE: Feb/74/2006 RELD WORK DATE:10/18/OS LE• DR NAME: DRAW - _. Ld:::.••. •. �• I * . I ' o BY: MEE SCA avRaMXCT[ct/Asu/boi/AcAors/u�ALx.owc ti CHECKED BY•MEE PRp,I LEGENDM4 SHEET EOF E LEGENDs AT BRIDGER CREEK II Proposed Yard Setbacks ,,���� f1 -------------------BOYLAN-ROAD-------------- % �• TUMBLING WATERS CT. —MAIDEN SPIRlff ST.---_-�-�� ��' —---- — \� % \`v' % DGEFIELDCT. i EDICINE WHEEL LN. �• % % �>--_•-_-_ BOYLAN ROAD (— ------r------------------- �- ——————— 15 j 15.a ---- - ------------------------------- -------------- ----------------- ---------------- --------------- I I I16 I I_ I i i DIRECTION THE FURURE i HOME FACES I SETBACK LINE I j �15' YARD SETBACK DISTANCE I I 1 1 IF NOT SHOWN — ALL OTHER SETBACK DISTANCES TO CONFORM TO THE OCTOBER 1, 2005 BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE r LWC LEGENDS �(BRIDGER CREEK II -465)0 um oo mites'¢4 mm�n ans try(cel iv-m rx fu9 ae-Hw CLIEN I:EDGEFIELD YARD SETBACK PLAN FIELD WORKMMI pATE;12/02/OS PLOTTED DATE: Feb/14/2006 DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:1'-200' DRAWING NAME: crRoccT/sass/cox/AcAo/a.pm/Io(k�eo�x:ov�c CHECKED BY•MEE PROJ .LEGEN0511 SHEET PACE OF 1—PAGE r Ll,,(' ENDs ATBRtDGER CPE?,14,' It PARKING EXHIBIT CREEKWOOD SUBDIVISION 4-EGENDS 11 PROPOSED 2.3- SULL PARKING LOT, SEE MASTER PARK PLAN ' FOR -PETAiLS ECENDS 11 f ROP0SED � 5—STALL PARKING LOT / EOOD SUBDIVISION18—STALL 1 UI I a � 1 � i 7 131 PARKING FA L - ;' Al ONS E3OYi AN PnAD Bridger Canyon Drive _ LWC LEGENDS 24' x 7' PARKING STALL .i BRIDGERCRE II � mo�at<�e^r.a» �(aq errs rs(rq CLIENT•EocEF�T o PARKING EXHIBIT 7' FIELD1ypRK•MMI DATE:91/07/OB PLOTTED DATE: Feb/14 2006 DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:1'�100' DRAWING NAME: a wrotcrpeaeito2/AcAo/tmnRAmwc.owc CHECKED BY•MEE PRO,I tLEGENDSII SHEET OF T—PAGE • • 13 c • Viewsheds • • Legends at Bridger Creek II - VIEWSHEDS The attached diagram shows the viewsheds looking onto and across the site from the surrounding properties. There are essentially no areas of high visibility from a well traveled transportation route (i.e. Bridger Canyon Drive or Story Mill Road). This is because the subdivision is located behind the Mt Baldy and Ed Vogel subdivisions, west of the Creekwood subdivision, and east of the Legends I subdivision. The 75' wetland setback will help preserve the viewsheds of the creek corridor. • s LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II VIEWSHEDS Y , \ 4735 V hdb 07 ,\ _•- �„ *' �, rye. llV�� 0 1 jl. _ O .7]0 Y �:�.y . g';�✓ w' e c .^.�'y ,,.-as t -.Y y, ,a �. Lwc LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II dJ T:EDGEFIELD LC ORK• DATE:10/20/05 POTTED DATE: Oct/21/2005 DRANKW BY: WE SCALE:1•s50' ORANINO NAME: cwn.Ecr/3ess/=/Auo/EMrs/srn1cT s,:cnaasorc CHECKED BY'MEE PROD SKEET OF • 14 • Preliminary Plat I 'wP RELIMINARY PLAT of CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION & GRANT OF EASEMENTS ! We.the undersigned properly cwnan,do hereby certuy that we hove caused to be surveyed.wbaMded and platted Into PR THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II ^ram act of Imana doaywtand oho tlMabna and dedications.as mown by this plot hereunto handed,the fallowing Doted Nita day o/ 2008. LOCATION A tract of land being Leta 27 a 28 of Mount Eddy Sub&&&-and the tract of land shown on FOm 12 Page 025. q. .. Records of Ga1kW Count,eltuoted In the 51/2 Section 32 T5,RBE•P.M.M.,Gallatin County,Montana,and being more 6P SUBDIVISION °once'°eyd°�ed-TI/16 c StateCounty a Camman,hq al Ina C-WI/IB cornier of acid Section 32 the True Point e/eaghnhg County o/ e ere $ Thence along the E-W mid-sectkn line.SBB15'40'E a distance of 140.00 feet to the Nreod of Bridger Crack This Instrument wasacknowledged before m an by Pod Rughaim BEINGLOTS 27 & 28 OF MOUNT BALDY SUBDIVISION AND THE TRACT Thane dung said thread or Bridge,Greek through the following two- -OF LAND SHOWN ON FILM 12 PAGE 825 RECORDS OF GALLATIN (Signature of NotorkA Offlc,r) Thence 579'44'40"E a distance of 32.34 feet, 7 Thence N8S02'03'E a distance of 32.34 feet to cam mid-.ecllon Ilse: COUNTY SITUATED IN THE SI/2 SECTION 32 T1S R6E P.M.M. Notary'name- °Stai<aped a printed ' ) ) ' ) Thence long eerie mid-t«lbn The.58815'40"E o dlalan.e err 137.48 feet to ecm thread err&idger Creek; Residing g at for Thanes long cold thread of Brldger Crack through the following 96.oursea. My canmiacien..Pines: OWNER O� E uG GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ,O CREATE 12PURPOS SPACE.AND Then..S48'45.54-E a dlm..or 27.34 feet;Than,°55235.47"E a distance of 10&00 foal; Dated this day of 2006. 4W N.RYMAN.2nd FLOOR DEDICATED RIGHTS-OF-WAY Thence S58.4l'35E a distance of 173,00 feet Thanes S745Y2eE a distance of 31.00 reel: MISSOULA.MT 59808 Than,,S8T42'34"E a distance of 25.00 feel;Than,,S8754'32'E a distance of 29.60 feet Thence S6115'37'E a distance of 3&50 feet Thence S4222'24-E o distance of 325D foot VICINITY 1�'iAP PETER R PAUL RUGHOMER, manta S50.4Y45'E a distance of 14.00 feet Thence S755Y50'E a distance of 24.50 feet MARY RUGHOMER TOCTOR Thes.o N74V3'17'E a distance of 29.00 fast:Theme S81'46'56'E°distance of 7.50 tact slate of NOT TO SCALE 1104 STORr MILL RD Thanw S4759'13"E a distance of 27.00 fact'Thence S0075'55'W a distance of 11.00!act BOZEMAN.LIT 59715 Thence SI123'20'W a dislan,e of Ia00 fact:Thence S421T01'W a distance of 16.50 feet County of Thence 57238'37W°diet-cc of 53.35 fact Thane S58.44•il'W a distance of 3276 fact This Inatn,rant was,ckn wkngecI before me on by Mary Rugheim.r AREA SUMMARY Then,'SIO'1B'17'W a distance of 11.00 feet Thence S13'31'48"E a distance of 8.50 feet; Wid,r. Thence S61'4T0TE a distance of 44.00 fact Thence S49.45'23"E a distance of 77.50 feet GROSS AREA L2.4 95,622 SRFt(57.29 ACRES) LIKE TAB Thence S642455'E a distance of 130.00 fact Thence S81VY24'E a distance of 38.00 feet 859 WEN SPACE EA!1,G31,674 SgFI(23.68 ACRES) Thence N5451'26'E a distance of 26.00 fact;Thence N33 W32'E a distance of 8200 reef (Signoture of Notarial Officer) 141 7 .O.B. RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA-506.018 SgFI(11.61 AWES) � � LOW Thance N4T10'30'E°dlelance of 28.50 fact;Thence N7414'05-E a distance o/19.00 feet PU C-WI/18 CORNER SB8'15'4DwE NET LOT AREA 947.931 SQ<t(21.99 ACRES) LI SBB15' I/-W Thane S69'WS8'E a distance or 15.00 feet Thence S4623'28'E a are=or 24.be feet-. At CORNEA FND BPC MARKED IFl•1 j79 l2 Sig '40 25.50 Thence 52579'09'E°distance o/2&00 feet:Thence 5097I'1J'E o distance o/7200 fact Notary'name-typed 'tamped or printed iND ALUM CAP 1ORRISON-YAIERLE 37.46' 76 L3'- Thence$1559'33'E a distance of 29.00 fact'Thence S3314'30"E a distance of 31.00 feet Notary Public for Ih°State or PER C.O.S.2 INC.f0062LS' '45'54"E E1/4 CORNEA L4 4 4 31 Thence S555YIWE a distance o!34.00 feet Thance S78'00'29'E a distance of 43.00 feet R0°'con a1 an C1/4 CWDIEK FND UT DEPT.OF 15 SU4Y34 2&W Thence N6821'42"E o distance o/19.00 feet Thanes N48'39YYE a distance or 56.00 feet: MY eommmi axpiree: 32 LS r FOUND ALUM CAP TRANSPORTATION 4' C-E1/IB OWNER Le Then,°N45'39'43'E a distance or 1&75 feet Thanes N099S25hW a distance of 25.50 fact 31 PER C.O.S.2408 FOUND REBAR '1LUM ChP L7 1'I53 Thence N2252'26'W a distance of 61.50 feet Than,,N1126'1p-W a distance or 15.5D feet t31233' - - _ SBBIS'10'E 97&OB_ 12FM 825 _ - SBB1602T 130&id 18 RS7Y57'50 ]L)0' Thence N1456'47E°distance of 62.50 feet Thence N 4!59'1'E a distance of 14.18 fact V.C. _ _ _ - ST131B02T }2 O Then.'N740]l]'E°distance of N.30 feet Thence 57459'S1-E a distance of 27.ar feet: .o' / - - 131 37 LIa 24-6 ThenceS5T3l'O8'E a distance of 39.00 feet Thence SSOIS25 E°distance of 23 0 feetSS 1eE Thence S39'OB'24E a distance of 20.50 fact Thence S18V9'30'E a distance of 14.50 fact �' f BOUNDARY NOTE m DD• L12 Then,e 501'ITSS'W°diatanca of J0.00 reel;Thane s143a'SB"E a distance o/20.00 reef7HE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE PARCEL SHOWN IN Fl I 12,PACE Thence S61'41'WE a distance of 49.00 feet.Thence N8126'06"E a dlelance of 3200 feelLI] 27D0'LL1 825 IS THE THREAD OF B OUNDA CREEK WRNIN THE THE SECRON I Thence S74'3T191 a delan<e of 24.00 fact Thence 559'46'WE a distance o!66.00 lest CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR L4 J2. 1NEREFORE THE BOUNDARY WILL CHANGE AS 1NE CREEKl14 LI4 Thence S40'}g'29'E a dlelan..of 84.10 fact;Thance S4919'/{"E a dietan,e of 68.00 fee: I,the,rdmig,ed,Thomas M.Hm,,h,Rgletw,d Land Surveyor,do hereby certify that OpHi SP ) 4 CHANNEL CHANCES. THE COURSES SHOWN BETWEEN QAND® I$ L15 Thence S6059231 a dialan<e of 61.50 fact;Thence S6955'WE a distance or 55.50 fact; betwem and I surveyed The Legends at Bridge,Creek L)D Lls L,9 L45 REPRESOR THE THREAD OF BMDGER CREEK BASED ON A SURVEY LIS 1 Thence S72'39'00'E a distance of 07.00 fact:Thence S4238'20'E a tlistance or 17.50 feet SubdlNakn II and platted the sameas shornan Ua aaanpanyyi1nngg plat and decv0ad hL18L16 L4 L49 CONDUCTED IN APRIL 2003. NO MONUMENTS WERE SET ON SAID L17 3azv Thence s2528'12"E a distance of 21.00 fact Thence S12W56"E a distance of 22-50 fact dance with the proNekns of the Montano SubtllNelan a d Platting A,t,S«hone �m L19 7 L3D BOUNDARY OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN. 195 LIB Thence SH'41'46"E a distance of 23.00 feet Thence S67'41'19"E a distance of 13.00 rack 76-3-101 through 76-3-625.M.C.A.,and the Bozeman Unlfled Oewlolunmt Ordinance. AG I I'((yy L31 la LS1 L 4 119 510/017M II Thence N7852'3{"E a distance of 9.00 fact.Thence N58W'38'E a distance of 19.00 fact; 0 $G 6QN ATERLNE L42-V L55 L20 S1331'48 5-W Thence N37*30'WE a distance or 16.50 fact'Thence NliV9'46-E a distance of 25.50 reef Dated this day or 2006 2 L CREEK L56 L96 OI Thence N17'59.47-W a distance of 32.50 feel•Thence N0236.25•W a dlelance of 15A0 feel• _ Thence N28'45'20"E o distance of 20.00 feel:Thence N46'39'37E a distance of 40.00 tack 6 L78 L9D 91 L23 S84.2C55 13OW Thence N5921.30-E a distance of 31.50!act Thence N7V36'4TE a distance of 34.50 fact �pFJ(7 col• c 5 9 04 Thence S87V832"E°distance o!59.00 fact;Thence S74V9'02'E a distance of 29 50 feet Thomas M.Henesh,PLS FND BPC MARK t ^ NBLIN L l21 129 Thance S55V2'14'E o distance or 5250 fat Thence S4228'53"E a distance of 97.50 feet' Reg.No.10062L5 IIWR150N-MNERIE. rr] ' `3 s �`� 19 L35 )/ATBR$ W.C. NS708•} B,.pg• Than S2913'33'E a distance of 2&50 fact Thane'S50IDS *E a distance of 15.50 feet 18 2lS" •••• wc� •p 6Thence S69'39'32-E a distance of 1200 fact Thence N8955'O5'E a distance of 22W rest CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION V'- Than N6925'WE a distance of 39.50 fact;Thence N58V7'09"E ,distance of 76.50 feet: We.Etl Rold.U.C.and I,Matthew E.Ekstrom,a erg q 1D L37 CO RT 0' 178 N7Cl4' Then,'N3&"'29'E a distance of 26.81 feel;Thence N279J'19"E a dlelance of 35.ar feel; 9e registered f llZI-9 onol Engineer Ifcanaed to $ 7 I practise M the Slate of Nanlana,hereby certify that Ina/dl°rino MDrovemenl0.required to N k L� 21 2A 17' ��1 D 129 56756511 15. Thence N4011'1{'E a distance or 51.00 feel;Thence N4T35'00"E a dlelance o/{7.50 feat: el Ne requ0ementa of Ula liUa or as conditions o/approwl 1 ins Legends al Bridge, �J �` ry�°r v (� rj� UNpIAiTE 130 Than N54'30'09'E a distance or 34.00 feet;Thence N7422'00'E a distance of 37.50 feel; Creek II SubdMalm.haw bean Installed N conf°nuance with the opp a-d plane and UI S2539V9 Thence N8122'18'E a distance of 33.50 fact Thence SB426'38'E a dieter..of 31.00 feet: specification. •p LT2 S093 I] 2,W Thence S7TN'49'E a distance of 47.00 fact;Thence S66'32'11'E a distance or 20.93 fact to the E1/16 line: Thence don m El 16 line.SOOV9'27'E a distance of 85353 fool to the SEI 6 coma.cold t else being the 2 ID'I22 4 I]4 SSJ14']0 SIDO' g sin n Dan g 5 5 3 9 H f oouRT northeast,aide ef a vagel SubdiNebn; 25'TRAIL ape s G �+ _ L36 SNSYls 34. The financial Imp,ovemenlo raw not been,omdete0.but are subject to an 9nprowmenta EASEMENT �+ •� c I.QI'tll S Lof� t 'R fit b LOTJL �n v meow Bang the 51/18 afine.di tam line a°°being et to the o dam t toner and the north Mount is Mount Belay one financial guaraneac: PER OOC. •1 a L37 NW21'4 19D0' SupdM.lan,N881833'W a distance°r 2525.48 feet to the northwest Bomar°f Lot 28 of Mauna Bddy SLbdMekn; 1, /1297495 Q&ESPA�10 I 33 L35 NIB 4 ce l39 Thence don the real line or ecm Lot 26.50145'05'W a distance or 323.24 feel to the north right-of-wayline of TRAC1 7Y 4 g 9 E '&^ �4� I.07 LW N090525Y 25-d Bridge,D� The suodMder hereby The against defects In these 4nprovemonle far a period of and $I!a I "pRT B 8 a year ham to data The subdMder Ormle.and the City e/all public hfroas ion o G O I ® ID7� I.OT 40 a L42 Thence along sem right-ef-way.N8B16'43'W,distance of 100.07 reel to the W7/16 Ian. Lnfrasunpn,emenla to the City of 9suaxect t one the CITY)hereby wean ans ceseeaalon of ao public � I.OTSO hfrwWclure MDrovemant0.subject to the bow indicated ty. 0i'Rg$PA�9 eve �ln b LOT 67 60 37 I.OT m L43 NIF56'1 2. Thence along mid M/16 line N01'45'N'E a distance of 323.25 feet to the SW1/16 corn,• dI�OF/6'LD S 87 '76 q} LOI7 66 1 LN J.Petrick Garrick Dated Matthew E Wta Dated �48 0SP�3 0' L45 Thance continuing along mid WI/16 line NOOVT28"E a distance o!131&8]feel to the True Point of Beginning. Member,Edgefleld•ULC 108WPE SWI/16 7 8' ve C. e'g aT7 IDT 6J 62 SJ I.QI i L48 nes9'1 7. . CORNER IAI'BS LQIU L47 Sam Gael cont Eno 57.29 oere0.more or leas,and It subject to any mlathq ectemant0.whether of record er apperane y s s fl i.OT I.MA 1.0T f.OT 46 LIB an the ground. Debra H.Melt Dales FNDLog SW 1 Director of Pudic Ser"._ OFF BOAT SPINE LSO The tin County. tract of land la to in udedknow and designated* w"The en Legends parks, lhn s ceek II Subc Intuar r 3 REB UNE;SEr N88'16 33w1Y 2525.46 151 sh wnn an mid pl t we h eby�tteda d ddonnated to ire City f eo mane a public and m,pyManken werac CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER - REBAR W/8PC Y N r ON L52 SICUU 20100' 1,Kimberly Buchanan,Tracwrer of Gallatin Count Montano,ca hereby certify that the NT BALD N gU8DM9 $Et 18 OWNER The undersigned hereby Dante unto ecdi and awry parson.Wnrl,or cerporatkn,whether public or priwt0.WONding or accanponyin9 plat has been del eel and County, all red M BpINs'� M Y i BABY SUBDINSION FND ALUM CAP fferig telephone.telegraph.elecWc power•go%cable teleWlon.water or newer scs lce to the public•the right to the Y axomh al how lancer and special S1 h MOUN VpGE1• 19 L55 5)4.3T12t I )olnl use of an easement far the construction,maintenance,repair and removal o!their Meer and other facilities,In, 0D9Q8°m is asaeanad and lathed an the Iona to be wbalNdad raw been Dam. FND ALUM N 156 over,undo and acoaa each are°d afgnatea an this dot as'Utility E conent'to haw and had fatwr. Dated this day o/ A.D.,2006 CAP 495W 1.57 S1(09'29 94W TSB S4919' t 6ex Dated this day of 2006. Treasurer o!Collalh County LSD ,1 100.07' - - - - Let A6T HWY 86(BRIDCER D)IVE n 39'00 67.ar CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE - - - - LB! NOTHING FND;SET h Slate or 1,Debra H.Aal,Director of Public S"ce,City or Bowman,Montana•do hereby certify RFAAR W/BPC L64 S2B2B1 1 L6 that the accompanying plat has been duly examined and haw found the same to conform to 5175358 7T30' County of the Iona•cpprow It.and hereby=apt the dedication to the City of Bozeman far the public lb5 use of an d L66 S6741'I9 &W This instrument were acknowledged before me an by Y an all lands shown an the dot as being dedicated to won use. LW 14767SYWE 9 j Doted tMt day of A.O.,2006 as of Edgenold.TLC. L69 NV WE le-W LA NI I'OV461 25M De-H.Mall L71 (Signature of Material Officer) • Director of Public Service LEGEND Ln ND73625V Ism' L73 N2B45' 2D.ar Notary's mid.-tyDed.stomped or printed CERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FOUND US PUBLIC C LAND L74 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW Nolan Public ro,the State of SURVEY 1/4 SECTION CORNER L75 N5921' 31 R.W at The Le da at Bdd Creek 11 SubdiNsim.Gallatin Count,Montana•le within the Ot MONUMENT °g m. 98r Y of US MI'JB'17 345C My commisalon axpirea: Bozeman.Montano.a s ad ate°pursant to.and NNh a 01 atne area of the Bozeman • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED growth pdky which was adoplad pursuant to Seaton 76-1-801 el deg.,MCA,and can ee L78 574'09' 2959 s proided with adequate otornl water drainage and adequate municipal fecilitie0. tharefers. SET REBAR W/BPC MARKED L79 SSSl714 E 525d Doled this day of 2008. {- - under the proNebns of Section 776-4-125(2Xd).MCA,this subdMakn I.czdudad from the O -MORRLSON-LMRLE•INC.10062S- - NOTE LOD requbommt!or Menton,Department of E Anon nenld Oudily mAer. DUE TO HIGH GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS,FULL OR ml 527ISSI 2 Dated this day of A.D..2006 Y FOUND STEEL PIPE PER PARTIAL BASEMENTS ARE NOT RECOMMENDED U12 4Q031A 16'S0• stile of BALDY SUBDIVISION UO Count W.C. WITNESS CORNER y ef EASEMENT NOTES 18 f�25'os 184 10956V5t 22DC' Debra N.Mall BPC BLUE PLASTIC CAP ALL LOTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC I86 This Inatnar-I was before me on by PeterRugM.imw. Director or Public serwi,e O.S. OPEN SPACE UTILITY EASEMENTS: U17 N3B44'201 28.8' L39 WSSI 3500 CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER PHASE LINE -10'ADJACENT TO ALL PUBUC STREET (5'grwture of Notarial Off er) RI(i1T5-W-WAY Lagr I,Shot ay Vance.park and Recorder o/Gallatin County.Monlan0.do hereby codify that the E%W 00STING WATER UNE -10'ALONG REAR LOT LINES NOT ADJACENT TO A LOD 1473WOVE 47 ' fwegoinq InsWment was Filed In my office at o'clock(aeon..or p.mJ,this EX SS DO NG SEWER LINE COMWR INTERVAL-5' STREET OR ABET - 191 NSs3G 34.00' Notary o name-typed.stamped or printed y day o/ •A.D..2008.and recorded In Book , ♦7.5 OOSANG 5'CONTOUR 192 Notary Public for the Stale ef f Plots on Page (an0owmant Na, 1 Recorder al the Clark and IOD- 200 0 100 200 L93 N81• 1 J].50' Residing at Reseda,Gdlalh County.Monl a. GROUND ROOD HAZARD AREA My canmission aspires: GROUND TRUTH BOUNDARY RESTRICTED SIZE LOTS O4 s54•ze'}e S7D0' 1 (O FEET) THE FOLLOWING ACCORDANCE 19 LOTS ARE DESIGNATED"RESTRICTED ITTED 8 W PROPOSED 8'WATER LINE 188 5661Y11 SO95' Shelley Vance.Oak and Recorder e SS PROPOSED 8"SEWER LINE BASIS OF BEARING LOTS W ACCWDANCE WITH THE DIN a BOZEMAN UNIFlED BEARINGS roe THIS PUT ARE S WITH DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE , }}) (C{KKX DERIVED FROM GIPS OBSERVATIONS wIM �MORRISON 7 4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE SURVEY-GRADE RECEIVERS AND LOTS 41-45,47-4&5S,37,160.62,66,67,82 90.94,96. / REFERENCED TO THE MONTANA COORDINATE 9&112 116 1 MAIERLE�tNwc. SF,SW 32 Tv; RRF nn^^����'' NtIlANDS SYSTEM,SINGLE ZONE.IND83(NARN) ®m;an Ie•ao eve,eavc vL a,n•w..1roO al-mn r:covey M]-rm PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA CLIENT:ASPEN PARTNERS GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA r FIELD WORK MMI PATE;12/20/OS PLOTTED DATE: Feb/14/2006 - 11:26:03 am DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: SMR SCALE: C:\DOCUAIE-I\JHOCI l\LOFJ•LS-iV-mP\BWisL 4\PPLAT LOT I.dw f CHECKED BY TMH PROJ®:3959.005 SHEET 1 OF 5 aanro a.: mw 1 PRELIMINARYTLAT of THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II • 93M 2w D ► SUBDIVISION; - 6 — BEING LOTS 27 & 28 OF MOUNT BALDY SUBDNISION AND THE _ 5 e 7 '^ TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON FILM 12,PAGE 825, RECORDS OF GALLATIN COUNTY, SITUATED IN THE S1/2 SECTION 32,T1S,R6E, P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA S71'S7'24 x, * 31.00'S87'4 4'E x , 25.00' S 54'32'E N 29. S61'1 37'E " \ 35.50, 3By7>� $ \ S42'22'24'E ✓��+ "; `** +.** * � "" L \ 32.50 S50'47'45'E N74'03'17'E 14.00' T 29.00' S75'57'50'E 581'46'S6'E 7.50' S47'59'13'E S00'25'55'W Arc S11'23'20'W SO Q 23 SO 51 S42'17'01'W (IN FEET) �� a•\� Y *ooNs$js` aPEN WAPEq1"" *u�* 1 y'��O ` " *" l 5 _ 16.50• CONTOUR INTERVAL-V AC AND- " r;Y 6; ` 13 S10't I,W 51331'18'E *Y xY**Yxx"" Y 11.00' 8.50, S61'47'07'E s + S8 \� 44.00' \WETLANDS YI"ir�trni p a * '1• • Y " *' "+" - " . x "" *x x \ LEGEND SEEK * v -FROM EROM L-WATER- IX J x v " + x x x x * * x x y YMW CRE -•--�:.; _ _.___._. x H _ * x r'-"_` `ResIXvomlTD eE 'D � MD1Rro us Pu9uc HAND RFIO ATED TO 6URVEY_ 1(4 SECTION CORNER a .. ORT1mEW STREET / YONUM 1' *��//-\� • MOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED -r''"•^'.�.y-•--7'-. 0 10RRISON-IWRIE INC.100825 * v * e" SET REfiW MARKED * ` y • MOUND STEEL PIPE PER EDSTOIG WOO' q12. BOItl BOND' ..BLW.• 1768 L�TS.B eW *V % �T' NOUN fl4DY SUBDIVISION SEWER LINE Q yy ,. BLOCK 7 �- L'I10, W.C. WITNESS COTdIER E BPC BLUE PLASTIC CAP fey • O.S. OPEN SPACE \\ Ime7 + 3 asL RESTRICTED 92E LOT y7 PHASE LINE LOT 2 x X— BARBED WIRE FENCE OAT LOT 4 LOT 8 LOW LOT 10 —56-50—Se— 73'WETLAND SETBACK 11,5 SpFt 7 11,39Bi l 11,598 Sgfl 47 0 - 11,961 SgFt 11,881 t - HA—Sq, g 10.776 8�t .} SS EXISTING WINEwWATER LINE /„ ` ^1 O.S.12 OHP OVERHEAD POWER LINE FWD BPC I N P� LOT 12 5,2B8 SgGt �Q, GAS UNDERGROUND FL GAS LINE 10RPoSON-Y 10.31E Sgit � �_ ` 3 L 1a0-YEN FLOOD HAZARD AREA IC.10089.5' Nf601,Wy W o• GROUND TRUTH BOUNDAR'/ I mom. RSG I M-04y !b ', e% 8 w PROPOSED B'WATER LINE Isn IY 4SR.Y I 8 SS- PROPOSED B'SEWER LINE 10138 PROPOSED ASPHALT EDGE V / �708 fit\ EXISTING ASPHALT EDLE V ( OAT Il 35.00 •� _ 4• \ PROPOSED SIDEWALK \ Tyed 1Q298 SQi/ 1V3.26° s4 S \ DC WATER VALVE POLE 1LOT 7 LOT 6 TAT�5�C a� LOT I8 :T LOT 17 a :� �' � a' l p EPojIS�jINO SEWER NANHOIE SaF 9,188 5w, 9,199 SCI t - 9,486 SgFt = 10,310 SQiI ,•y O y S_ PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE 20' PROPOSED TIRE HYDRANT 23'TRAIL FASEYENT 4' -8c PER DDT../2187495 _ 4 7,LOT I" O1�Si�•p / 20W 1_� BD W 80.00' .0 1300v +h DOSDNC wE'RAND ... @.SR .. 27IY yp,3. / R. W, *Y D•21'Jfi'N' PARK- _ •50 YNy]�017' w t ew ,��°�` L• {1. L . dUDIBN SPJTTT S It8 e ,O v•o. .� -�736 -G - RSL uDo Imo. mao mao 650C_ 13BY 14 L.2P�1 v , •{2.{ Lw� L`4L 77 J yq�OT�� 1 gn g -4731- 473 3F s gL03,�21l gtl q / / „�I s � I I a _ `6 '61 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE \ ///�F `� ,. ' , 5l gMORRISON 9a / 32 T15 R6E / L�1.2J' ,"p3.2D 0' MAIERLE,I1'7C. X. M8nlI � „• SE.SW Ra72.aD 1y /pp•OD J N ••iM:�a�r�• nxxm /\ a apypt•pVy,ppjp - a/ ruw el*er•r�nnRm •:(•9�.mn r-(•)�-Im PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA OPEN SPAC 0 CLIENT:ASPEN PARTNERS �TIN COUNTY,MONTANA "350 Sit -.a - FIELD WORK'MMI DATE:12/20/05 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/14/2006 - 01:26:13 pm DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: SMR JCH SCALE: umoomVaa�suTV+H,v wm t_yero CHECKED BY•TMH ppOJ 3959.005 SHEET 2 OF 5 nmlm ee.•s i IMF PRELIMINARY PWT of THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II SUBDIVISION BEING LOTS 27 & 28 OF MOUNT BALDY SUBDIVISION AND THE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON FILM 12, PAGE 825,RECORDS OF GALLATIN COUNTY, SITUATED IN THE S1/2 SECTION 32, T1S,R6E, I/ � � LOTU W.00 P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA /� R �• 7• „ °� '/,//�\/, 10.298 SgFt LOT 7 .l LOT 6 LOT 3 s� LOT 17 L.0 Sgfl 9.199 SgFt - p+� LOT 18 9,199 SgFI - 9.486 SRR _ 10.310 Sgft G o 25 TRAIL EASEMENT 8C_ec ' ` 04� LOT 1 �$ PER DOC.j21974QS r. / o. _ W.OD' 1 8250 L.4S.73• p R-45M.01 D.21'38'N' :5 - 7.od 'aw 399.]]' a lz ew Yy 6EADIEN SPRlT S RE ° e .pp •Bop. �$ om.: 736 - R. 0 �•]sd .°' 7 z•44.4 :1 Ld4j1 la ' 2D.00' I W. �. W.DO' 6p.0p' Y Ld4,11 �- ]OD7 63.00' .• .I].e7' 1.2131 � .� O 42. Ly RSLyYC Ql g^ r•W R ^ R nLL R 4731 R.—F�i.•� - �` - S� LID 10,55J 9730 / ,/ 1 ^— / 6" •] I6' 1.]' 1. 70 1 ' 50 0 25 'A 1 I\\1 W.W' (( 0 (IN FEET i R.T72.00 i 2W.OIF W.W' W.Ip' ./63.2 I r CONTOUR INTERVAL-1' m9o1•aw x a.av t Narorav za.3r OPEN SPAC 0 WG E%IST WATER LINE \^V 63,3W SgFt RESERVOIR 0RELOCATED ��BE NOR EY/STREET/ BT�60' EN SPACE 14 ST 'ar W'ar 6SOD' 65,OD' 65DIF -NBBI t TRACT 7Adp8 I > 69.303 SRFI / 6] ..'`� l L Gp.S• 47.9 21 UIAt LOT 100 q o aszoSRTI g s n e Fg 8g LEGEND 98 FOUND US PUBLIC LAND MONT UMENT/4 SECTION CORNER OPEN SPAC 9 pyo .W Gc00 65.00' > 660D' 60 mg,. • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED 23,986 SRFI .Y•7 7'T ...°. •..e ss O SET REEIAR"MORRISON W/BPC LE INC.MARKED00825' FIELD TREET(60') �'� - - ® FOUND STEEL PIPE PER WAD' Saw MOUNT aALDY SUBOMSION L\ Saw W00 50AO 50.00' ,Opp' ...4 W.C. WITNESS CORNER 50.00 7� 75 0• 7xW, � BPC BLUE PLASTIC CAP 70 O.S. OPEN SPACE J 3'y RSL RESTRICTED SIZE LOT EI R VARE FENCE •�j�$` g .] S 2f �52 �Q oO S ? o �A W aJ: $ 3 -58-59—58-� 75'S WETLAND SETBACK W EKRNG WATER LINE SSRSL E20571NG SEWER UNERA lz mw RA OAP VERHEADPOKER LINE CAS UNDERGROUND CA LINE 50.00' E SWI/16 CORNER 5D.W '3 ]0.00' n�h3 /\ P rWM 10D-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA _ e 50.OG 7,. 7 P dppp• GROUND TRUTH BWNDARY ll e6e Sg - -p ss - - ° e 8 W PROPOSED 8'WATER UNE I ess a gq - e5S _ B SS PROPOSED 8'SEWER LINE PROP SED LT EDGE 20'-WIDE PRIVATE ACCESS I FND BOAT SPIKE DOSTING ASPHALT 1EDGE EASEMENT FOR LOT 29 OF OFF LINE:SET MOUNT BAIDY SUBDIVISION EDP_ W/BPC EDP_20' 20' PROPOSED SIDEWALK CENTERED ON ACCESS AS CONSTRUCTED 0 ON WATER VALVE 41POWER POLE p'12' M�HT BALD �M4 O CIG NTIS SEWER MANHOLE ® PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE Y PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOT 29 9)9 Y\ / C\7(l N &X/\XY X, EX He WETLAND N ll�� JJ�� 11 H M M N Y a o c MOUNT BA DY SUBDIVISION rn U 6 Z� q O -s �MORRISON 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE c I �-� SE.SW 32 T15 R6E FND ALUM NOTHING NO,SET MAIERLEjNc. •�r.• CAP 4955S REDAR W/BPC �' ^.wyrw.s oa.my rm;.m T.m.a•aa r....n,am•r...IW em-mn re T•9 eR-un PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA CLIENT:ACPEN PARTNERS GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA FIELD WORK-MMI DATE;12/20/05 DRAWING NAME: 8 SMR/JCH PLOTTED DATE: FeD/14/2006 - 11:26:22 0m MT NNY BB(BRIDCER DRIVE) DRAWN BY: SCALE: x�vemaaevupwesr•nw+.r Ism:-Ae.4 CHECKED BY� MH PROJ b;3959.005 SHEET 3 OF 5 amrzo lM Amb, As PRELIMINARY AT of 74'S9'S1° THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II N74'03',7'E pp' 14.50' N33'36'32°E / SW123.50325°E SUBDIVISION N74'119. 15'00''S8°E 14.41 23.50' 19. 15.00' e, � 539'06'24"E N4T40'30'E S46'23'28"E � � � 20.5' 9 / 28.50' -\ ` 24.50' h '� S1G09'3o"E BEING LOTS 27 & 28 OF MOUNT BALDY SUBDIVISION AND THE / \\ 28.00'09•E _ 1aSOI TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON FILM 12 PAGE 825 RECORDS OF 28.00' S01'4T55"W > > N11'26'10"W 30•00' GALLATIN COUNTY, SITUATED IN THE S1/2 SECTION 32, T1S, R6E, 2000458"E 32.006'06°E P.M.M.', GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 4 - _ S74'3T12"E 24.00' q• 9 _ S5946'42°E r 5'S9'S3"E 29 �\ - \ \� 14.00' � o 26.00' � � I I• �? � r.�LW' V 1 bw 1 p S33'14'30•E ` Q 31.00' S55'52'13"E ` 34.00' \ /6821'42°E 19.00, LOT 19• O 7 ]y 9.637 59Ft KE77-ANDS \ 20 - lll O.S.1 ['96 9 S9Ft 3 / 30 (1 2s 30 /,30e o / +F,�'V ' 0. h 10.58. )B ! J 1 I , (IN FEET) 1 \ i'C l•t5.2B •1-{6.2•' [•Pa., .@ 7o it G ,• CONTOUR Ir[rFRVAL- I' 7081 t R•I500 LOT 21 e t Sak1 y Lp3'j7y�'. 9.370 S9Fl P 8 P •2 LOT 1 .t .�. ZT2.3 \ ' L•L78' Ltl �70] 0.IO3YI5' w -• ._a L.]s;�] t•ItlM11 LOT 111 /��' � � �b L �� 1 _ LEGEND RSL a Y f $ ➢n�`' T 22 �� LOT 25 n j ' FOUND US PUBLIC N C O SURVEY 1/1 SECTION CORNER IO.s76$tlFl C,� 7.15' .728 54F'fD MONUMENT ;p [. 4 +\ • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED 8 Io-Q$ - '�'> , > °�B • ��.. y`a^�pw `Qr,� �a \ _�� SET REBAR W/BPC MARKED ]^ [ _+ )•$ a a 21 O MORRISON-MAIRLE,INC.10062S' •6\ S]T29.25* 1lV C4 �• bQ 47. 21.ar J �11O-j 1•y0' \4� i FOUND STEEL PIPE PER .�- MOUNT BAIDY SUBDMSION 2 ..163.20 LOT 26.R-372.OU 0 [•) t3,698 SqFt LO 26 W.C. WITNESS CORNER 0 B,Bs7 Ft BPC BLUE PLASTIC CAP LOTr 7�7p a.7756�t _y O.S. OPEN SPACE b $ f OPENSPAC 0 ,0•L B'O h PHASE LINE SIZE LOT PHASE LINE 63.350 SOFt ., q1 T •I) ls• % BARBED WIRE FENCE b 6_ '`I92`�)/�O ft.JB' b��rp. .r6• lM.ar 8'8C 7s'WETLAND SETBACK wa 73 0 ` ri 3 Y' [•11J 97.3Y 39.06 N0.68 w 9)a6 0 / ,,,/// 32•` COS WATER LINE / SS E%ISDNG SEWER LINE 65W ! L-58.62 f cps: -4q Q OAP OKERGRO POWER LINE V B! [ ) GAS UNDERGROUND CAS LINE .�0; _ bLV �766 L•130.77 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA R-I.� / .•..-. GROUND TRUTH BOUNDARY b 0-2p1 7Y 7g ... 8 W PROPOSED 8•WATER LINE ` &T^ lbl LOT 79 ] 1.9 t,91 6.999 SRFqqq `/L•11.1 .. 87.55\ •.. .• ..1.77 l 8 SS PROPOSED 8-SEWER LINE o•" 'P p Y .. ,...wl]SY R 15.00 y /a-1;40 PROPOSED ASPHALT EDGE . ) \ 0m LOT 76 - L{27s• r' L f.2r VL8 _�a •j a+ 7 /•� 19$qFl _^ LOT 69 0.10 /p.B/ll' EIOSDNG ASPHALT EDGE `tl g a- g� . 737r I Ag)b 8.364 S9Fl PROPOSED SIDEWALK C 6 �a4 k jS I pe WATER VALVE • Ltl qC/ •i 1i 60 LOT POWER POLE as MANHOLE Otl ^Q�� Bt 59F1 -n ary a III 7 u 89.& ® �SOPOSED SEWER MANHOLE Epp• 2 / Sir Ngp�,Iry �� h f 53s1 50F1 W_�-�,�yy� L0T 70/' T6 r PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT %slF t IZ '1 • s N`y'� x 'Y7SN•1 "4 " b'r1 1LAID� •`�O1 .• LOTS - U` 8 r/s42•- r F Ex15Twc WETLAND 7.107 l m 6;03 Spit , L-17M yer4- LOT71 b.ar /N)fisi �857t 3 s. t 75ar � ]0 L.72.s8 .� - Nark ryWy N78.21y 7 }A4�j S>s' 89 14 18' BC- filg• q2W. LOT 82 5.000 SVFI )`i .4•TSyFI 4 0 3 LOT 72 LOT 65 1,s.7oe sail 5310 SQF1 l 5�18'JJ ro.ar SB818'p'E r nIw3 3 sest{. $ LOT 83 b' ��� v .A _ 72AB �tl 08 IVc 9,478 alO :9 IV OT//4 75* (< 1RL50 6.0Sl 6� l•131 .121• .6 LO13T S6O8F t ar - bar O'STOY{9' / Da5Y0Y1B'tl�, L L•11.10 m IS00 71. :�, e e ew e I SS Ito.er p0• 5 W t087! ar1Y - L- IY FN'S5' _ ew b• / SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE W _ �JORRISON- e e 32 T15 R6E e .ess AIERLE7INe. P�,.• 588 16'33"E 2525.46' ""�'" '�^ ,v SIGN I I e.iiiA roT tm-�ae�nam.ws lw6loam rs twe)m-ran PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA SU M IHT BOY I Y0�'i Wg0(1 CLIENT:ASPEN PARTNERS PLOTTED DA�TE:INFeb/14/2006 COUNT263Z N�TmNA ED I FIELD WORK MMI DATE:12/20/05 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: SMR/JCH SCALE: PAT CHECKED BY�TMH PROJ#:3959.005 SHEET 4 OF 5 raorrm lm PRELIMINARY PLM of THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II SUBDIVISION BEING LOTS 27 & 28 OF MOUNT BALDY SUBDIVISION AND THE TRACT OF LAND SHOWN ON FILM 12, PAGE 825, RECORDS OF S84.26'38"E S7T44'49"E GALLATIN COUNTY SITUATED IN THE S1/2 SECTION 32 TIS R6E N81'22'18'E 31.00' 47.00' ° N74 zz'oo°E P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA 37. N54-30'09"E 34.0' N71'36'47"E b 34.50' N59-21'30E P 31.50' - \ N27'53'19'E N28' O"E - / / �,� 35.00' — 1 l 20 _ d� N38'44'29"E - NO2'36'25"W 26.81' j — 0 N17'59'47"W 32.50' L 5 — 1 •1 \ 3 �_ - -� _ 50 9 25 so 1 IN FEEL) CONTOUR INTERVAL-1' 9' 0 WETLANDS v 1 -67g Y0. 39. � I e.ro LEGEND 0 FOUND US I PUBLIC N347B'ODt L , SURVEY 1/4 SECTION IN CORNER N8 LOT 384'28'art 28m• W � 0.289 t / MONUMENT LOT 29 1„+ �•F 30 - ",a, LOT 4 i • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED 7B 10.036 Sail 6 u 11.852 l 9,396 5�1 j:, - LOT)I LOT 3J �+ Lo &B57 6RFl y - - LOT 37 SET REBAR W/BPC NARKED LOT 27 } 9.163 SRFI O LO 32 10,861 SQFt ti 10.765 59F1 •110RRISON-LWRLE ING 100625' &]36 SRFI I 9,1{7 59F1 ?`a' 9E , FOUND STEEL PIPE PER BC-gC MOUNT BALDYCOR SUBDIVISION 97\ 39.ar L+ta.e6' L ]5.]6 L•73.28 ,•h+ •JO 0jb81' 'A I RPM N-G W1TNE55CORNER .. .:....:.. _... .. -.. .. .. L-77.42- l 106 S9 O.S. OPEN SPACE BLUE C AP °o. LOT 35 _ IOeip• G .. 78.7 II. Fl n VO.JI Z - a.6T t ps= RESTRICTED SIZE LOT eW a L173.47• ( b PHASE LINE R-22B0.0 % BARBED WIRE FENCE �.t6' - e - e L 0'D-I e•a e LOT 36 —50-5H— ]W WETLAND SETBACK v `60• EXI 9. t WATER 5 54F $ trJF ss STING 8 5 SEWER UNE EI g y L Q 1, 1-77 I L L-100.1I ..•. •. :•..,..._ - R. ° I6J EC 8C ) ti OH 0 HEAD POWER UNE p UNDER(7t0UND GAS UNE L L75- 0 $) L-11Y 19'T-' L•100.1 ..... 6.66• >M.qqq D-10 '20• � t"• �840'S �� / Ov 4 °°• 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA / Odl / R-15A0 / LVD. ] �� ..• 2]'S3' � T40 LO 66 $�-� LOT 59 >6 9 l•.19T L ..... 8. SaFI �'. ORWND TRUTH BOUNDARY 0 8,1{5�l _SI�t L, D-1509'I9•A.I. J IV PROPOSED."B SS_ 5 PROPOSED B•SEWER UNE o L.1 / !Sail \ .. ER UK 2!.6• •, IJ F 'T S 99b40./ 4 WM .4al.-E \\LO L 0 36' •66.69' 73.7Y PROPOSED ASPHALT EDGE 100 IWAB �" >S R-1500 Nam. 4' ''- _ EXISTING ASPHALT EDGE 000 t s LOT 60 $ Ss LOT ',d 0-27Z9'13• I L" PROPOSED SIDEWALK $ " RA3,000 Soil $ $ 5,000 SpFt $ �.]3Y� 'g' LOT 49 Imo• - 8 I I oa WATER VALVE �� 43•l4 .� RSL p1 RA 6.393 SgFl 83' �Oa POWER POLE W I a b(, 0 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE S moor 100ar � NB850' Y I ® PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE 66 W 5,500 5 t $ 100.ar sc �91-31 .: 5. Y PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT A 1 I 8 6 TAT 61 $ ss LOT i 1j S,aoo sit $ s 5,00o t y R L 48 I , y - GG_ L• 6 00 Sort O RN SPA I 1024Y S ri' ei 10000' 23.681$4fl V q I E1fISIINC WERAND OPEN SPACE 5 1ro�. Izb20 S9Ft oo.Do' o` P I LOT 65 LOT 5 >s tram' 75o.ar 5,310 Sit I ,75' I 5000 SqFt _ -• 15 �O�OOT t 5.500 l $ LOT" py, l 70ar 5000' S0.ar �5000' "a" v" RA RAZ (5.000 SOFT &R I 108 SB850'33Y �y �� S."... ." w yv I �L^ 6 IAT 64 N y 100.00' 31• t00Atl 100'� N845031E4��••�/�tny - .1 I Sit $ IUyLOT 6J Inv =_ SC-SC LOT 54 v IAT 5l SC 31' 100.ar m_ 15.00 _ 5,476 SgFt I�4500 . S R-1300 5.645 5 f0 6.478 wt �. -�CiL IAT46 u 53 L F1� E"14.10 Lrl34f 5 G R-1500 J .13A1 5,M WI 40' 56yy DDD--6 ar1Y Dd1'14'SY L-14.40' L•131Y �' RA SL �� I —e e 65• 135 .N' .MOS �•D-5500'4Y D�FU'N• EO�• ew a 153 5000' I �, efi9 e9s ess — �-241W a .Bo' Soar so.00' so. y e ess e w 45s— — B g1/4MOARRISON SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE g1BDIW MID IAWMRC5SLJNC ^•r® SE.SW 32 T1$ R6E VDIA' /9555 MAIERL EQ I e,...;em.m.e°aae�..n»m-rt�Iml m-�r. re lw0 m-gym PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA CLIENT:ASPEN PARTNERS GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA PLOTTED FIELD WORK MMI DATE:12/20/05 DRAWING NAME:Feb/14/2006 - 11:26:42 am DRAWN BY: SMR/JCH SCALE: +vsss3nmuvov�ww.+wu1 I,m 7-a.ma CHECKED BY-TMH PROD -3959.005 SHEET 5 OF 5 n°nr°In: I .. f y cOC Y`"v 2 GA OF M0T�T2'l' _ 1 Gallatin County Department of Geographic Information Systems Official Read Name Designation Date: 12/28/05 Legends At Bridger Creek 2, Bozeman Atlas Page: 36-32-C Township: 1S Range: 6E Section: 32 Cross Street(s) Boylan Rd (extended) Official Read Name(s) Wden Spirit St; Northwtew Stg Medidne Whuel Lug MdReldStz, Tumbling Misters Q; Atsita Lug BtaWeet Lug Cret Lug Richau Lug Edgeftetd Ct IMPORTANT NOTE Gallatin County is in the process of evaluating existing road names and address numbers throughout the County. There may be re-naming of roads where necessary, and re-addressing non- compliant structures to State of Montana Standards and Enhanced 911 National Emergency Numbering Association(NENA) guidelines. The major purpose of this change will be to facilitate the easy and rapid location of properties by law enforcement, fire protection services, search and rescue and emergency medical services to protect public health and safety of all persons living, working or visiting in Gallatin County. GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA Geographic Information Systems Department Authorized Agent r 15 .j �_ • Lighting Plan a o 0 • • • LIGHTING PLAN Attached is a proposed lighting plan and luminaire selection. The plan was done by Mel Kotur from Northwestern Energy. • { 1 LEGENDs AT BRIDGER C REEK t 11 Lighting Plan BOYL-AN- OAD poll TUMBLING WATERS CT. AID SPIRI ST. O DGEFIELD CT. EDICINE WHEEL LN. B LAN ROAD MIDFIELD ST 03 • � F � J 03 C' 100 Watt, High Pressure Sodium, 9,500 lumens, mounted at 25, DeCO3hic1d 400 Luminaire 150 Watt, High Pressure Sodium, 16,000 lumens, mounted at 35'. Decoshield 400 Luminaire LWC LEGENDS a BRIDGER CREEK 11/463" • HADCO CF73 Bollard Lights _ ,�m�x�wvianw-�„,,.„. w,�pnq,.....o r�prgw. CLIENT:EDGEFInn LIGHTING PLAN FIELD WORKMMI pg7E;2/14/06 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/14/2006 1 =200 DRAWING NAME: SCALE:DRAWN BY: MEE CPRO.ECT/3959/eD2/ACAD/PRE-vuT/aQITINGONC CHECKED BY-MEE PROD fZ.LEGENDSII SHEET _PAGE OF T-PAGE PROJECT NAME: FIXTURE TYPE: Whether you prefer a smooth or rugged appearance, the Techtra { CF73 has four roofs to make the perfect selection. Its .�- lighthouse-type construction makes this bollard, a supplement to the larger Techtra Post Light series, an excellent choice for various shoreline applications. Choose from black, white, green, bronze or verde. • • • UPPER HOUSING:Available in four roof ELECTRICAL ASSEMBLY: Medium FINISH: Our durable powdercoat finish styles either with a wide or narrow brim base porcelain socket, 4kv pulse rated. electrostatically applied and bonded by and a smooth or ribbed top. Lens shall HID ballast is core and coil HPF available heat fusion thermosetting. For larger be a 7"diameter, 3/16"thick cast acrylic in 120/208/240/277/347 volt. projects where a special color is cylinder. Cage legs shall be 1/4-20 required, contact the factory for more stainless steel rods with an external 1/4" WARNING: Some local interpretations of information regarding minimum order schedule 40 aluminum pipe sleeve. Roof the National Electrical Code, Section quantities, set-up charges, and lead- is constructed of heavy-duty 3/16"cast 210-6, only permit the use of 120 volt times. aluminum. Head is secured to the fixtures when they are mounted below 8 bollard tube with (3)5/16-18 stainless feet. Check with local authorities before WARRANTY:Three year limited steel Allen head set screws for specifying alternate voltages. warranty. easy removal for lamp maintenance. MOUNTING ASSEMBLY: Heavy duty CERTIFICATION: UL Listed to U.S. and LOWER HOUSING: Post is constructed 3/4"cast aluminum base plate shall be Canadian safety standards for wet of 6"schedule 40 aluminum pipe mounted to(3) 1/2-13 x 15"galvanized locations. Fixture manufacturer shall (6-5/8" O.D. x 9/32"wall). steel anchor bolts with washers and nuts employ a quality program that is audited on a 4-1/2"bolt circle(use factory to ISO 9001 standards. OPTICAL ASSEMBLY: Refractor is 6" supplied template). Base of bollard can tempered borosilicate glass, available in be leveled with over and under nut or Type III or Type V distribution.Also, mounted flush. Tube shall be mounted to Specular Lower optics available in Type the base plate with(3)3/8-16 flat head V distribution. Allen key stainless steel tamper-resistant I screws. HADCO-GENLYTE-THOMAS GROUP,LLC•100 Craftway•Littlestown,PA 17340•Ph.(717)359-7131•Fax(717)359-9289•www.hadcolighting.com ISO 9001 Registered 0 copyright HADCO 2001 CF73-Spec • 0 PROJECT NAME: FIXTURE TYPE: DIMENSIONS & MOUNTING DETAILS 16" 11-112" - -Bolt cirice (416mm) (286mm) Mounting Template ,• '�-e` 4-1/2'dia.ref. Clearance hole for UNC anchor bolt 3 at 120-,°,9/1 9/16'ref. i • • H11 --' i - Flush Mounting 'Conduit stub area ii Flush mounting does not /require leveling nuts and 42" washers.Use hale plate Leveling Nut Mounting (1170mm) 5/ with flat side down. he j 3 3• Minimum Suitable conduit Ground (supply wires) Une I by others. Mounting with leveling nuts, cast base must be level,nuts and was he.must be tight against both sides(over and Concrete under).Use base plate with foundation by gat side facing up. others. (3)12-13 UNC x 15' plated steel anchor bolts, each with(2)heavy plate washers and(2)12-13 UNC hex nuts(supplied). ORDERING LOGIC Housing Finish Top Lens&Distribution Wattage Lamp Voltage n f1 F—K ] - �01 m CF73 A Black 1 Brim/Ribs K Acrylic R3 Type III Refr. 50S 50W HPS E-17 E 120V • B White 2 Brim/Smooth R5 Type V Refr. 70S 70W HPS E-17 F 208V G Verde 3 No Brim/Ribs L5 Type V Louver 100S 100W HPS E-17 G 240V H Bronze 4 No Brim/Smooth 50H 50W MH E-17 H 277V J Green 70H 70W MH E-17 K 347V 100H 10OW MH E-17 Housing Finish Top Lens&Distribution Wattage Voltage PROJECT • HADCO-GENLYTE-THOMAS GROUP,LLC•100 Craftway•Littlestown,PA 17340•Ph.(717)359-7131•Fax(717)359-9289•www.hadcolighting.com ISO 9001 Registered O copyright HADCO 2001 CF73-Spec Bozeman Division 121 East Griffin Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 ¢eeeeea Telephone:406-582-4637 Energywww•northwesternenergy.com June 7, 2005 The City of Bozeman City Clerk of Commission P.O:Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Attn: Robin Sullivan Dear Robin: As you are probably aware, NorthWestern Energy has been asked by the developers of the Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision to work with the City of Bozeman to create a Special Improvement Lighting District (SILD) for the Legends Subdivision for the purpose of installing streetlights. Enclosed, please find the information on the type and number of poles and fixtures, a lighting layout, as well as preliminary costs.. The design for the lighting layout will most likely.continue through any future phases. This layout calls for ten (10) streetlights. The two lights on Story Mill Road will be 150-watt High Pressure Sodium shoebox style fixtures at 16,000 lumens mounted at 35'. This is in keeping with the requirements of the UDO for a collector street. The remaining eight lights will be 100-watt High Pressure Sodium shoebox style fixtures at 9,500 lumens mounted at 25'. These eight lights are intended to meet the UDO requirements for local streets. At this time, the approximate cost per light is $30.83 per light per month for the 150-watt lights and $29.40 per light per month for the 100-watt lights. The cost per month may change from these preliminary figures pending any manufacturer price increase or increase in our PSC Electric Tariff. I have not included our Street Lighting Agreement for signature at this time pending final SILD approval. If the City needs any additional information from NorthWestern Energy at this time,please let me know at your earliest convenience. I'll also send copies of this information to those listed below. Jami if you have any questions on the design or material specifications relative to the UDO, please give me a call at 582-4637. I'll be glad to help in any way that I can. Since ely, �. A�/ Mel Kotur NorthWestem Energy CC: Jami Morris, CityPlanning Dept. Matt Ekstrom, Morrison Maierle �•y FNR �- '3 } � � � - - •'' ail d 'i4Y:J 4 MPIRI , ,xfiLl "' • - • / C-to 7-�m;mms;' Of err x��f�i .. �d.f�_� ifi� �' • • ••• • � • • a 0 • ��TiJ41iA ..4 _.. IV . d r " {3y� tip y: r a ark: 1 1: j ( � 11 kr �t� r 1 k�,j3'�'�� k� � .,y `' I •. �` x T.'a. S����'r Yt 4• YnvCul '�. W'�F�'�,} FF�]r s s � iY y�IK ri � �77yl.aryi�h rr u t j a�} •c✓yk3 - �f.. 4"s5+ +�, Iq+.1 1. S 'L SY y 'V �1'd..i,�` 4�Y IT �} I-�at•I'19k � �,t a :i �pe•' Q I L Y,Lh 3}, �lr�P' •--•r"YaSi`n.. -k. k Q Sef x�ta,� 2,��'..i-Y t �`i• r�'�,�'Sz,,u�yir�,y� .b�i�:. m apl k._ y�p'�u�,(p.�+,•r>��y�F�, �4 n D"r,"t (va u ' , 4M ., a J J Whe licahons • GE designedand kiii_It ballast provides GE Decashield 400 luminaire is designed for walkways, Proven long life and reliable operation. driveways, tennis courts, malls, shopping centers, commercial • Plug In Ignitor makes servicing easy. and industrial complexes, residential areas and parkway • Removable Ballast Tray option for easy lighting. maintenance. Features • Hot Restrike Option (Non-UL) available. • UL1572 Listed SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS, and • Enclosed and gasketed optical provides CUL Listed to meet Canadian electrical requirements. superior optical performance with • Standard construction is IP54. maintained light output levels and low • Die-cast aluminum housing and hinged door combines maintenance. classic contemporary styling with rugged, lightweight durability. . Direct mounting arm for flat or curved • Available in 188 different colors;-the smooth polyester :surface. . .. .. . - powder paint finish provides both corrosion resistance and an • GE patented ALGLAS® finish on aesthetic appearance. For available colors other than our reflectors means superior optical standard dark bronze, black, charcoal gray, aluminum and performance. white, please contact your GE Lighting Systems sales • Numerous application requirements representative. are met by multiple distribution choices • Stainless steel latch design and removable one including: piece door assembly provides no-tool Type II, Type.III, Type V and Forward access to both ballast and optical Throw. compartments for quick and • The field rotatable Type Il, Type III easy maintenance. metal halide and all Forward Throw reflectors provide lighting design • Y'y .`a flexibility. ,,, � . •- � �,_..,,� : • Alternate flinch, 8-inch and 12-inch mounting arms available. • Luminaire shipped in one carton, under one ordering number (including Mounting Arm) for easy order entry, tracking and receiving. sr� • The GE Five-Year Fixture Failure Warranty assures. the highest quality and trouble-free maintenance. DSMT 40 S 0 A I C V C 3 :DD C Light IES Distribution Product ID. Wattage Source Voltage Ballast Type PE Function Lens Type Type Color Options XXXX XX X X X X X XXX XX XXX DSMT= 07=70 S=HPS 6OHz See Ballast and 1=None G=Glass See Ballast and AL=Aluminum A=Llghtning Arrester, Decashield 10=100 M=MH 0=120/208/ Photometric 2=PE Receptacle Photometric BL=Black Grounding Type 400 Luminaire NOTE: Standard: 240/277 Selection Table 4=PE Receptacle Selection Table DB=Dark C=Charcoal Filter with Ballast HPS only Mogul Multivolt A=Autoreg and Shorting MC2=Medium Bronze (Not available with Tray 15=150(55V) base lamp 1 =120 B =BiLevel Cap f Flat Surface & Type11 (Standard) FWT) Mounting Arm 17=175 not 2-208 G=Mag-Reg with NOTE:Receptacles CG = Charcoal F=Fusing(Not DSME= 24=250/400 included. •3 =240 Grounded Socket cnnnected same MC3=Medium Gray available with Shell voltage as unit Cutoff multivolt or Decashield NOTE: q=277 WH=White De Luminaire NOTE: 0 H.=HPF Reactor or Type III 120X347V) 5=480 FWT=Forward NOTE:Contact with connected Lag factory for other J=Line.Surge Er.±eme! for 250W D=347 r =Het Restrike Throw colors Protector, Expulsion Slipfitter, for 25=250 F =120X347 IMusl:dsoordw7 HTV=Horizontal Type 2.375 in. OD 40=400 T=220 orrunnat riohi (Non Ulf Type V P=Prewire with 6'of pipe mounted. 5DHz Coulact Factual 14/3 cable. M= Mag-Reg R=No Mounting Arm D y=240 P =CWi with nelgl a rmmaire NUT[.±zox' ''' Grounded socket 'cnnnrcrr d In' Shell with Ballast IMv Tray & Curved Mounting Arin . UL t �IJZCD The caralou numbers,optinus auo modihcaoow.nr. C this page are UL Listed unless otherwise noted. � J JJ p 5!J fi"�j.� I Jt J�7 It �'�iT e ri r.? i s IBM < ✓J•y y �•;: `Dimensions Drilling' Templates DSMT } DSMT SOUARE'POLE MOUNTING: - 2.375 in.(6omm) L__ T■ STANDARD l 5,2E (!mm)DIA I iron :6.600in. 9.000in. T—• .rsahVIM)DIA I. 165mm) (229mm) 5. HOLES . I' i.E12h 21DBh(59suN U ��23, n (203mm) f5�mfiA/ -�Y iuuj i;,au*ni HOLE — 24.000 in.(610mm) .&%S h(17mm) . —4 1.312 h(33-n) 2.250In. (57mm) `DSMR 17.000in. ROUND POLE MOUNTING (432mm) 3.5 to 4.5-inch(89 to 114mm)OD round pole 438 la(l lmm)DIA . 5=h HOLES (M M) — rT MIN • 271Dh(tBmiQ DSME ------�, 6. In. (fo "r 2.375 in. Pipe) , T'°h°'" ""'°"' .. OLE All 4.000 in. (102mm) I a .....----- 9 � ${ a lj`t4 is e Table Ba/last and Photometric Se/t c Selection e `°` • `''``'`���'��'�' "�' All light sources are clear unless otherwise indicated. Photometric Curve h` Ballast Type/Voltage Number 35-'17xxxx 60Hz 50Hz IES Distribution Type Light Multi- 208,240, 347, Wattage Source volt 120 277,480 120X347 220 240 .MC2 MC3 FWT HTV 70, 100 150(55V) HPS H G,H,M G,M H N/A N/A 8591 8596 8604 8599 2,50, 400 HPS A A, P A, P A, P A,H A 8592 7315 8605 8600 175, 250 MH A A 'A A A N/A 8594 8597 8607 8602 400 MH A A, P A, P A, P A A 8595 8596 8608 8603 NOTE:N/A=Not available. Data Approximate Net Weight—35-45 Ibs (16-18 kgs) Suggested Mounting Height—20-40 ft(6-12 M) Effective Projected Area: With Mounting Arm.— 1.8 sq ft(0.17 sq M) Without Mounting Arm — 1.4 sq ft(0.13 sq M) References See GE Lighting Systems Product Catalog for Explanation of Options and Other Terms Used, and Pole Selection. See Catalog supplements for Photometric Curves and Guide Form :� Specifications. re +� C� .�Borges Ac .*External Light Shield Photoelectric .Control �s • ELS-DS — Cannot use with LVS, • PECOTL= 120, 208, 240, 271, Multivolt— Polycarbonate vandal shield Turn and Lock • PEC1TL— 120 volt—Turn and Lock' • PEC5TL=480 volt—Turn and Lock i External Slipfitters Select "R" option when choosing ordering number Pole Top Tenon.AdaPter:..Ro.und for luminaire. PT 4.&ML.—'Dark Bronze—Single"Iuminaire*,;' as A • ESFBLTDS001 — Black for 2-inch (51mm) pipe . pTTA=R-D90—Dark:Bronze=Do'uble at 901' • ESFBL-DS002— Black for 1.66-inch (42mm) pipe •pTTA=..R=1111180 Dark:Bronze—Double • ESFDB-DS001 = Dark Bronze for 2-inch (51mm) o:. (2.375 inch [60mm] maximum OD) pipe • PTTA RJ.90—Dark Bronze—,Triple at 90 • ESFDB-DS002 Dark Bronze for 1 114-inch 'PTTA•R'Tt'20—Dark Bronze :Tgple at 120° r• PTTA=R=090— Dark Bronze—Quatl at.90° s� (32mm) (1.66-inch [42mm] maximum OD) pipe NOTE:Must bider(ouhd pole adapter separately(BPADB D$:or AOABGDS).'_;'.'., y'ES� "? x Its' S Internal.SlipfitterArm.Adalzter Pole.:Top:Tenon.Ada -or,:Square.,; •* • PTTA-S?SGL— Dark.Bronze—Sin la.,ummalre,. .'-- . Substitute color of luminaire for:_ in Ordering 9 Number. a PTTA-4n=D%— Dark-Bronze 'Double at 900 ISAA"'=DS •.PTTA,-&D180—.Dark.Bronze=Dodble.at PTTA-S4.96— Dark Bronze—Triple at 90' • PTTA-Sd090—.Dark Bronze=Quad at:90° f NOTE:Utilizes standard Decashleltr 400luminalre mounting arms with diagonal hoI`',y Knuckle'Flat Surface Adapter Select "R" option when choosing ordering number for luminaire. Polycarbonate Randal Shied •KFSABL-DS— Black • LVS=DS—400 watt maximum �• ••KFSADB-DS— Dark.Bronze Round.Pole Adapter for.DSIVIT `x Knuckle Pole Top Adapter Substitute color of luminaire for In Ordering Number.. ., , Select "R" option when choosing orderin *•_ P g RPA DS—For 3.5 to 4.5-inch (89.to 1.14mm) number for luminaire. = i . OD poles • KPTABL-DS— Black • KPTADB•D:S - Dark Bronze Shorting Cap ` • SCCL-PECTL s<-t Line Surge Protector, =r Expulsion Tj2e w . Wa// Mounting Plate • �P.-, '. • 35-411749BOl — Can be added to { w. many,fixture terminal boards. See •WMPBL.DS - Black Technical Section. •WMPDB-OS— Dark Bronze ps J�9 Inl;Registered Trademark of General Electric Company ''?Yy,'`,{,r•, rl r A!IIJJ .�J�.J�.`Jif1JJ JfJ�.. Trademark of General Electric Company1Fz ' Data subject to change without notice. j44.;• ', �•' Hendersonville, NC 28793-4506 LSP-1089E-8/01(31VI)GELS wwtv.gelightinqsystems.conf AREA LIGHTING GE Lighting Systems, Inc. GUIDE FORM SPECIFICATIONS DECASHIELD® 400 LUMINAIRE GENERAL DESCRIPTION The luminaire designated (identify) shall be a GE I DECASHIELD®400 luminaire ordering number (specify DSMTXXXXXXXXXXXXX or DSMFXXXXXXXXXXXXX), or approved equal, to operate one (specify [70, 100, 150(55V),250,or 400] watt high _ pressure sodium [HPS] or [175,250 or 400] watt metal halide ` lamp from a nominal (specify 120,208,220,240,277, . 347 or 480 volt, 60 Hz or 240 volt,50 Hz)power source and shall be capable of starting and operating the specified lamp ,.within the limits specified by the lamp manufacturer.The luminaire shall contain a completely prewired integral ballast 'and-an optical assembly that shall provide an IES Distribution Type (specify MC2,MC3, HTV or FWr according to photometric selection table).The luminaire shall be UL1572 Listed SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS and CSA Certified. --.- - Standard construction is IP54. Ballast, housing, optical and luminaire assembly shall all be from the same manufacturer. OPTICALASSEMBILY CHANICAL CONSTRUCTIONThe cutoff optical assembly shal}have a (specify one- piece hydroformed aluminum''reflector with a chemically The luminaire shall be shipped complete, including mount- bonded lightweight non-breakable ALGLAS® finish on all ing arm,in one carton. surfaces or forward throw reflector.with an anodized finish The luminaire shall have a die-cast aluminum housing and and field rotatable 90°in either direction) and heat/impact • one-piece die-cast aluminum door.The door shall be hinged resistant tempered flat glass lens.'The optical assembly shall and removable without the use of tools,and shall be held shut contain a mogul base E39 sThe socket shall have added'inocket siil with afiori;superior lamp gripping. 'givin it the ability to with-two stainless steel thumb latches for no-tool access to handle the higher pulse ratings of newer'H}D systems.The both optical and ballast compartments. optical shall be sealed by a stand`ard'dacr'on felt gasket. All exposed die-cast surfaces shall have a: (specify dark (There shall be an optional char66al'ft1cefed optical avail- bronze [standard],black,white, charcoal gray or aluminum) able.) polyester powder paint finish.There shall be a prewired pho- ` toelectric con trdi I receptacle available or photoelectric control receptacle.-with shorting cap.) *REFER TO PRODUCT PAGE FOR l3ALLAST SELEC- TIONS. FOR MORE DEFINITIVE INFORMA i ION,REFER r r 1 , r 1 TO BALLAST SPECIFICATIONS IN:'EC 'HNICAL DATA°:, SECTION. ;. The luminaire shall"have a (specify) type ballast*with an electrical quick disconnect.The plug-in type ignitor (for HPS only) and ballast shall be prewired to the lamp socket requiring'•eonnection of power.supply leads only.The ballast , shall be in full compliance.with lamp-ballast specifications I. available to the fixture manufacturer from the lamp manufac- turers at the-,ime of fixture manufacture. The ballast shall reliably start and operate the lamp in ambi- ent temperatures down`to`20°F for metal halide and-40°F for HPS. • ®Registered Trademark of General Electric Company s• 2 January 1998 Data subject to change without notice AREA �� • --�' ® GE Lighting Systems I I I • , 11 1 I , ........................................ ■■■■■■■■.....■.............■■■Mon..■■■■■■ ...................■..■................. ........................................ ■■■■■■■II�I�i� I ■■n.■...■n...■........■.....■■.....■■... .............................■■■■■■■■■. ■■■■■■�/I//�/%� :.. ■■■.■..■an:■■■■.■.■■■■.■Mono......... ■■■ ........................................ ■■■■■■%I,'/.%■■'/.i ...............................gnaw■.... ■■■■■r�r�rarir�■r�r�■ ■■.■■■■■■■n.■■....:...M: ......MoMo.■.■n ............■.Mo........11 ............. ..............:......................... :::::::::: :::::......:::::::::::::::: ■■■■■�e ie��►�=►dam._ = ■.....■■■..■.■■■................Hi:::::: MOMMEMI INN ............:......................Sono■■ .........:.............................. HlMu �� ����:i ■ :::::::::::::::::�i:::::: :_: :I'.::::::::::�:::::"Y:: :: :: ■■■■■�■■■■■� m ,...............Mon....... MoMo■...mows ... ,...■.■non................ Monn..n....... o I 1 I • II 1 ;1 I I ........... ...:.........:............. ....................................... ........■.■..HH:lMo.......H■...■n.■nn■ .■....Mono■..NN:If....................... ■■�■■■�ii■��, .................:::........NAME........ c rl 1 1 .............nn■■■n■..n..............nn. 1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■uuuun■■■■■■■■■■■■■u.n ::::::....................... ouuuu uu ouu o.0 uu■uuuun unuuu■un...■.....n..== u- o ou.ouu......Mon■uu.._____ ■■■■■rer�►ir���r�rr■ /� ........■.................::: .::::::::: .■n..n■.■......._....................... ■■■■ea■ aaaac��a■- . MUM ':.....:......................... , Mill—M ■■■■■le�l\\�\\\i: MlI .l::II ....:..........................Mon .Mono.... ............................... ::• I/ ::.■........■..■■.....II....n.. ■■■■■\\\\ii��i 0 ....•...11 ................................. ��� �� ■ii:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::: ■■■■■■,'_�_��_�_�_�_ i I a,, ........uuu......... uwuu: _ ■■■■■■■,--..�. '' Iu■uunn■unuuuuu..uunnn. uo u u uuuu............ I uuuun■nMo■n■u■nn■u■n■....■■uu _ _ ..nogg.■.■........................■■... ■■■■■■■.■■■■.■■...Mot.■■■■■■■■■■■..■....■ � I I � n0000unouvuuunuuuu.uu I uuumuuuunuuo■uouunm: ■■■■■.���.�.�� unununnuummnnnuuuum ■■■■■MA9111FAM rig ::...................................... ......■.■.......:....................... ...................■■. ■■■■■ � ■��� .......Mo ..-....■.n.......n■nMoom .■........ _ mm .......:..........................Mo....a ..■,,. ... uumumunuuunm .my■■■■■■■■,�'��� ai i I uuu■uuuuunuuounou■.n.■.Mo ■,S :I uuuu■uuuounu San man Mo ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ '' /.■■.■...■...........■...Mo.■n......■..u. nnuouuu■uuuunuuu■ounn I .... Page 4 5120 Dec 1995 V PHOTOMETRIGS [0,plete IES files available at www.cooperlloting.corn] 4 4 ' • E 3 3 0 C 2 E B C 2 .. 0 0 1 1 2 2 • I� 3 3 - ;mJ 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 .. UCS44920 JES UC840S30.119 UGSiOM$L.IES _ =1e 400-Watt HPS 400-Watt HIPS 40D-Watt MH 3on) - 50,000-Lumen Lamp 50,000-Lumen Lamp 40,000-Lumen Lamp Type II Type III SLE-Spill Light Eliminator MOUNTING CONFIGURATIONS Wall Mount Arm Mount Single Arm Mount 2®1801 Arm Mount 2®90" Arm Mount 3 @ 120' Arm Mount 3 (Round Pale Only) SDRIEEV . ED=o CIOW) E.P.&TABLE SINGLE BRILL PATTERN [W/Arm where applicable] 2 @ 1.80° 2 @ 90" 3 Q 90, US "E" 1.1 2.2 2.2 .1 TOP MOUNTING FOR SQUARE AND ROUND POLES .[order separately] Accommodates 2 3/8'-3'O.D.vertical tenons(arm included).Catalog number includes sliptitter and mounting arm(s).Square unit height is 6 1/4'.Round unit height is 6 W. ' CATALOG NUMBER E.P.A_ WT. (Ibs.) CA4S 1.2 39 CA44S 2.3 75 43S CA44S CA45S CA45S 2.3 75 _ �46S CA46S 2.3 146 CA43R 1.2 39 CA44R 2.3 75 CA45R 2.3 75 CA46R 2.3 145 A43R CA44R CA45R CA47R 2.4 111 live] CA46R CA47R 1. �- • E. CESSORIES + MOUNTING SYSTEMS s 6 1/4" 6 3/B' ; T' 1159mm] ,[162mm] i— [159mm1 _.. f?7limrrml • i 16 • 0 Covenants / Design Guidelines 0 1 " J-41? • tEGENDS at BRIDGE.R CREEK > THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS Section 1. Definitions. 1.1 Subdivision: The Subdivision at Bridget Creek Subdivision is referred to as the "Subdivision", "Subdivision", "Legends Subdivision" or "Subdivision at Bridget Creek". 1.2 Homeowner's Association: The Subdivision at Bridget Creek Homeowner's Association, Inc. 1.3 Guidelines: The Design Guidelines of The Legends at Bridget Creek Subdivision, as amended from time to time. 1.4 Bylaws: The Bylaws of The Legends at Bridget Creek Homeowner's Association, Inc. 1.5 Declaration: This document and amendments thereto from time to time. • 1.6 Property Disclosure: The Property Disclosure for the Legends at Bridget Creek Subdivision, as amended from time to time. 1.7 Lot: Any separate, designated parcel within the Legends designated and set apart for the purpose of ownership. 1.8 Residence: An Owner's place of habitation or dwelling which is a structure constructed upon a Lot within the Subdivision, which structure shall meet the requirements set forth in the Guidelines, Declaration, Bylaws, and Property Disclosure. 1.9 Owner: The person owning a Lot or Residence in fee simple absolute, individually or as co- owner in any real estate tenancy relationship recognized under the laws of the State of Montana. 1.10 Common Area: The portion of the Subdivision over which the Homeowner's Association and Declarant retain control, and the portion of the Subdivision in common ownership among the members of the Homeowner's Association. 1.11 Declarant: Initially means Aspen Partners 1, LLC. 1.12 Contractor: Any person, general contractor, subcontractor, firm, association, partnership, corporation, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company engaged in construction • services or performing any type of labor in or around the Residence or Lot. PAGF.1 OF 10 CPLADOI2208973 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIIIIIIIIII' PaG1 1 1 11 l ! . Illill.11�il l 111 l 111 l llll l 0/2006 ..10.88R .III. .. . Shelley-Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 104.00 • Section 2. Preface. 2.1 Description. The,Subdivision at Bridget Creek is a residential development set within three existing neighborhoods at the mouth of Bridger Canyon. The primary goal of the Declarant, the current owner of the property, is to create a development which blends into the surrounding neighborhoods and attempts to satisfy the goals of the City of Bozeman. The Subdivision at Bridger Creek strives to achieve this objective through the implementation of the Declaration, the Guidelines, the Design Board, and the Bylaws, which operate and should be read and construed in conjunction with this Declaration. 2.2 Zoning Regulations. This Declaration is in addition to those requirements set forth in the City of Bozeman Zoning Regulations ("Zoning Regulations"). In the event there is a conflict between the Zoning Regulations and the Declaration or the Guidelines, the Zoning Regulations shall control. 2.3 Reviewer/Design Review Board. All references to the Reviewer and/or Design Review Board herein shall mean the Reviewer and/or Design Review Board, whichever is currently serving as the reviewing authority per the terms of the Bylaws and Guidelines. All other provisions relating to the responsibilities and operations of the Reviewer and the creation, operations, and responsibilities of the Design Review Board shall be as set forth in the Bylaws and Guidelines. If • the Bylaws and the Guidelines contain a conflict in relation to the Reviewer/Design Review Board, in any manner, then the Guidelines will control.The initial Reviewer shall be a professional chosen by Declarant, and named in the Guidelines. 2.4 Ownership and Location.The Declarant is the present owner of all of the property included within the boundaries of the Subdivision, a.planned subdivision located in Gallatin County designated on the official plat on file and of record with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County at Book of Plats, page 2.5 Adoption of Declaration. The Declarant hereby adopts this Declaration as such is further defined and set forth herein. 2.6 Purpose. It is the purpose of this Declaration to ensure that the Subdivision attempts to blend into its surroundings, complement and enhance the natural environment and preserve and protect the interests and investment of the individual Owners. This Declaration, and the covenants and restrictions contained herein, shall attach to and run with the land and shall constitute an equitable servitude upon the real property and every part of it, including all titles, interest and estates as may be held, conveyed, owned, claimed, devised, encumbered, used, occupied and improved. This Declaration is for the benefit of the entire Subdivision and every part of it and for the benefit of each Owner. The Declaration shall constitute benefits and burdens to the Declarant and to all persons or entities hereafter acquiring any interest in the subdivision. The Declaration provides general restrictions as to the use of the Lots,while the Guidelines provide appropriate details in order to ensure compliance with this Declaration. The Guidelines • must be carefully consulted and followed to ensure the requirements of this Declaration are met. All the area of the Subdivision shall be controlled by this Declaration. PAGE 2OF10 220897:3 III IIII IIIII IIIII IIIIII IN 111111111111111111111111!111 11 /10/200510:59A • Section 3. Homeowner's Association. 3.1 Dues. The Homeowner's Association dues are currently estimated to be thirty-five dollars and no/100 ($35.00) a month. However, dues may increase based on budget expenses being incurred. At closing of the sale of any lot, two months of Association Dues will be collected up front; one-half of which is associated with the first months dues, and one-half of which will be deposited into a reserve fund. The dues will be used in a manner that promotes the general welfare and safety of the Homeowner's Association members and will include, but may not be limited to, the following: • Snowplowing and maintenance of internal trails and common area walkways. • Maintenance of common landscaping, park land amenities and signage; • Water and electric utility bills; • Insurance coverage for the Board of Directors and Association owned property. 3.2 Formation. The Homeowner's Association will be formed when fifty percent (50%) of the Lots are sold. Until that time, the Declarant will be responsible for maintenance and collection of monthly dues. An Owner shall send payment for Homeowner's Association dues at the beginning of each month, including the time period prior to the month the Owner moves in, to: • Brownstone Capital, Inc. P.O. Box 9079 Missoula, Montana 59807 Section 4. Combination of Lots. Two contiguous Lots may be combined to constitute one Lot, and that Lot will be treated as one Lot. Three contiguous Lots may be combined to constitute two Lots, and those sites will be treated as two Lots. Any combining of Lots shall be completed in accordance with Montana law and shall be required to meet any requirements, processes, and/or regulations set forth by the County of Gallatin and/or the City of Bozeman. A combined Lot shall be treated as a single Lot for purposes of determining assessments. No Lot may be further subdivided. If one or more Lots has been combined, the Owner of the combined Lot shall be entitled to the vote or votes, as set provided for in the Bylaws. If the vote is in relation to Amendment of this Declaration, then the provisions relating to Amendment set forth in this Declaration shall control. Section 5. Covenants and Restrictions. 5.1 Residential Use. 5.1.1 Single Family Per Unit. One single family dwelling is allowed per Lot. Owners should carefully review the Zoning Regulations to ensure compliance with all such zoning regulations. All Lots will be used solely for private single family residential uses. Only single family homes with attached or non attached garages will be permitted. Where possible, each single family residence shall be a minimum of 2,000 square feet of finished or conditioned space, excluding garages and • other storage spaces. It should be noted that some Lots, particularly R-3 Lots, in the Legends Subdivision are not large enough to accommodate a 2,000 square foot Residence, and on those PAGE 3OF10 III 2208973 P IIII IIII IIII 10/10/2006,.90:6BR. IIIII IIII ililll IIIII IIII .III IIIII Iillll it cw.��... V•nna_sallatln Cc MT MISC 104.00 Lots, residences can be smaller than 2,000 square feet in size. The Reviewer can advise each Owner and/or potential Owner whether or not a Lot will be required to meet the 2,000 square foot requirement, as set forth in this Section. 5.1.2 Construction, Lot Site Preparation Maintenance, and Landscaping. Any and all construction, alterations or improvements shall be subject to advance approval by the Reviewer. Each Owner shall also submit a landscape plan with any plans for construction. Construction and landscaping shall be performed diligently and in accordance with the guidance set forth by the Reviewer or Design Review Board, and in accordance with the Declaration, Guidelines, and Property Disclosure. Owner shall reference the Bylaws and Guidelines, and inquire with the Homeowner's Association, as to whom to submit such plans-e.g. name of Reviewer or location of Design Review Board, whichever is applicable. 5.1.3 Commercial Use Prohibition. No Lot shall ever be occupied or used for any commercial or business purpose except for an office or studio fully contained within the single family residence as defined hereinafter. Nothing contained herein limits the Owner's ability to lease the dwelling for residential use. 5.1.4 Occupation Conducted Within Residence. Residence occupations incidental and secondary to residential use as defined in this Declaration are allowed. A Residence occupation is an occupational use of a Residence customarily conducted entirely within the Residence by the • inhabitants thereof. Such use must be clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the Residence as living quarters, and in connection with such use, there must be no on-premise sales of products; no on-site employment of persons; no generation of pedestrian or vehicular traffic beyond that customary or incidental to residential use of the Residence; no employees who do not reside in the Residence; no use of commercial vehicles for deliveries to or from the Residence; no signs or structures advertising the occupation; no excessive or unsightly storage of materials or supplies or working on autos, boats, or trailers other than normal maintenance of such vehicles or recreational equipment; and it shall not be used for meeting the general public customers, or clients. 5.1.4.1 Examples. For guidance, the following uses are examples of Residence occupations: the making of clothing (excluding mass manufacturing of clothing); the giving of music lessons; service or product providers who maintain a telephone and office within the Residence but the services and products are provided and sold off the premises; the pursuit of artistic endeavors such as making of pottery, ceramics, paintings or bronzes, and the like, provided that the products are marketed and sold outside the Residence, and no foundries are located in the Residence. 5.2 Trailers and Mobile Homes. Trailer homes and modular homes are prohibited on any Lot. Recreational vehicles, motor or mobile homes,vehicle trailers or other trailers, and boats must be kept in a garage or otherwise screened from view. The Homeowner's Association may determine if an Owner is in violation of this section. 5.3 Mining Prohibited. No prospecting, mining, quarrying, tunneling, excavating, or drilling for • any substance on or within the earth, including oil, gas, hydrocarbons, minerals, gravels, sand, rock, or earth shall be permitted. PAGE 4OF10 IIIIIIIII 2208f973 IIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIII AM11/10/20 Shelley Vance-Gallatin Co MT Mrsc ,�,,, 06 10.66R • 5.4 Outbuildings and Temporary Structures. No outbuildings shall be erected or maintained on any Lot before the start of construction of a Residence and no trailer, mobile home, basement, shack, garage or other outbuildings shall be erected upon any part of the Lot for use as a temporary or permanent residence. Temporary structures shall be removed within thirty (30) days after completion of construction. 5.5 Exterior Improvements and Equipment. Application to the Reviewer for approval of pools, spas, hot tubs, or fire pits shall contain adequate details to establish sufficient abatement of equipment noise. If deep excavations are required for these improvements a site evaluation by a geologist or soils engineer may be required by the Reviewer. 5.6 Facades Facing Story Mill Road. In order to protect the intended aesthetic value of the Subdivision, the Guidelines will require additional architectural elements to be included on the facades of all R-3 Lots that face Story Mill Road. (See attached exhibit for acceptable style.) 5.7 Rear Yard Fences-Lots One Through Eight. As set forth in the Guidelines, Rear yard fencing on Lots one (1) through eight (8) on Block two (2), adjacent to Story Mill Road, shall not exceed a maximum height of three (3) feet, six (6) inches tall and shall be of open style only. This section shall not be construed to impose an obligation upon an Owner to install rear yard fencing. All fencing must be approved and installed consistent with the requirements set forth in the Guidelines. • 5.8 Orientation and Placement of Lots. Corner Lots are to be oriented in such a manner as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Similarly, Lots are to be setback from pathway corridors consistent with Exhibit A. Any Lot, upon which lies a townhouse, must meet the requirements set forth in Exhibit A for purposes of ingress and egress access to the townhouse. 5.9 Certificate of Compliance. Before any Owner may occupy or otherwise use a Residence or other structure in the Subdivision, the Owner must obtain a certificate of compliance from the Reviewer in the form set forth in the Guidelines. Such certificate shall acknowledge compliance with the Guidelines in the design and construction of the Residence or other structure built within the Subdivision. 5.10 Domestic Pets. No domestic animals or fowl shall be maintained on any Lot except as provided herein. Not more than three generally recognized house or yard pets are permitted, provided that such animals shall at all times be restrained or leashed. The Homeowner's Association shall make the final determination in any dispute as to whether a pet is "generally recognized." Excessive barking or other animal noises shall not be tolerated. If any animals are caught or identified chasing or otherwise harassing wildlife or people, or barking excessively, the Homeowner's Association shall have the authority to have such animal(s) impounded at any available location, and may assess a penalty against the owner of such animal(s) of not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) plus all costs of impoundment. If any such animal(") are caught or identified chasing or harassing wildlife or people; or barking excessively on any additional occasion, the Homeowner's Association shall have the authority to have such animal(s) impounded and may assess a penalty of not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) per animal, plus costs of impoundment. No owner of any animals(s) impounded for chasing or harassing wildlife or PAGE 5OF10 III 2208973 Iillll1111111111111111111111111 118illllllll /10l2005 10:58A IIIII IIIIIII r_ MT MTCP IMA M01 people, or for barking excessively, shall have a right of action against the Homeowner's Association or any member thereof, for the impoundment of any such animal(s). 5.11 Maintenance of Lots. Owners shall maintain Lots and improvements in good repair and appearance at all times. All landscaping improvements and property shall be kept and maintained in good, clean, safe, sound, attractive, thriving and sightly condition and in good repair at all times. 5.12 Vegetation and Weeds. The control of noxious weeds by the Homeowner's Association on those areas for which the Homeowner's Association is responsible and the control of noxious weeds by individual owners on their respective lots shall be as set forth and specified under the Montana Noxious Weed Control Act (MCA 7-22-2101 through 7-22-2153) and the rules and regulations of the Gallatin County Weal Control District. "Noxious Weeds" shall mean those weeds, which have been declared noxious by the State of Montana and/or Gallatin County. Re-vegetation by the Owners is required, and any plan of re-vegetation must be approved by the Reviewer. Owners shall be responsible for the control of noxious weeds on his or her respective lot. Both unim proved and unproved lots shall be managed for noxious weeds. In the event an Owner does not control noxious weeds, on his or her lot, within ten (10) days after receiving notice of such from the'Homeowner's Association, the Homeowner's Association may cause the noxious weeds to be controlled.The cost and expense associated with such weed management shall be assessed to the lot and such assessment may become a lien if not paid within thirty (30) days of the mailing of such assessment.The Homeowner's Association is responsible for control of any noxious weeds • on the Subdivision's parks, open spaces, community areas, trails, roadways, and specifically, the right of way along Story Mill Road. If the Homeowner's Association is not yet formed, then for purposes of this Section, maintenance, including any cost and expense, of any such noxious weeds in the subdivisions, parks, open spaces, community areas, trails, roadways, and specifically, the right of way along Story Mill Road shall be the responsibility of all of the Owners, as a whole. 5.13 Noxious, Offensive, or Hazardous Activities. No noxious, offensive, or hazardous activities shall be permitted upon any portion of the Lot nor shall anything be done on or placed upon any portion of the Lot which is or may become a nuisance to others. No light shall be produced upon any Lot or other portion of the Lot which shall be unreasonably bright or cause unreasonable glare. No sound shall be produced on any Lot or other portion of a Lot which is unreasonably loud or annoying, including but not limited to speakers, horns, whistles and bells or excessive barking or other animal noises. 5.14 Off-Road Motorized Vehicles. No off-road motorized travel shall be permitted. Use of snowmobiles within the Subdivision is also prohibited. Use of motorized vehicles is subject to ordinances and regulations of the City of Bozeman. 5.15 Hunting and Firearms. Neither hunting nor the discharge of firearms shall be allowed in the Subdivision. 5.16 Signs. No signs;billboards, posters, displays, advertisements or similar structures shall be • permitted except as approved in advance in writing by the Reviewer. PAGE 60F10 I IIIIII IIIII IIIII 2 2 08 97 3: of 12lillllIN1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111 11/10/2006 10.66R Shelley Vance-nallatin n� MT Mtcr 41Ae Aft • Section 6. Common Areas,Easements, Utilities, and Right of Access. 6.1 Common Area. The design of the Subdivision incorporates Common Areas,.including the water delivery system as shown on the final plat of the Subdivision. Owners shall have the right to use and enjoy the Common Areas and facilities. No improvements shall be constructed on such Common Areas. No gates or obstructions shall be placed upon or shall impede access to any Common Area. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain liability insurance and pay any applicable tax assessments on the Common Areas. 6.2 Maintenance of Common Areas. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain the Common Areas, storm water management system, and easements. The Homeowner's Association may take such steps as are necessary to ensure that all shrubs, trees, and other vegetation in the common areas do not block, interfere; or hinder the view from any residence. Such steps may include limiting the type of shrubs, trees, and other vegetation planted in the Common Areas, ' specifying the location of items to be planted, and/or removing shrubs, trees, and other vegetation in the event such items grow to a level that they block, interfere, or hinder the view from any Residence. Maintenance, repairs, and replacements of Commons Area grounds and improvements, including the storm water management system, shall be the expense of the Homeowner's Association; provided, however, if such damage is caused by a negligent or tortuous act of any Owner, members of such Owner's family, a guest or employee of Owner, then such Owner shall be responsible and liable for all such damage. • 6.3 Ingress and Egress Easement.An easement for general ingress and egress to each Lot and to all Common Areas for the general use of all Owners and their guests shall exist over all Common Areas, roads,and trails within the Subdivision. 6.4 Pathways and Residential Sidewalks. As set forth in the Guidelines, all Owners shall construct residential sidewalks conforming to City of Bozeman standards on all public street frontages of the Owner's lot prior to the occupancy of any Residence. However, notwithstanding occupancy, such sidewalk shall be constructed no later than three (3) years after the Subdivision plat is recorded. The Declarant shall perform reasonable maintenance on all pathways within the Subdivision until fifty percent (50%) of the Lots are sold. Thereafter, the Homeowner's Association shall be wholly responsible for all pathway maintenance. 6.5 Infrastructure Improvements. Declarant acknowledges that all infrastructure improvements including water and sewer main extensions, public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to final plat approval. 6.6 Utility Easement. A general utility easement for such utilities as electricity, gas, sewer, com munications, telephone, water, television, cable communications and other utility equipment is provided for within the Subdivision. All Owners shall have the right to enter upon and excavate in such easements but only upon the written approval of the Reviewer. Easements for ingress and egress and for utilities shall not be moved, deleted or restricted without the written approval of all affected Owners. Utility companies and Owners must restore disturbed land as close as possible to • the natural condition of the land before work commenced. 6.7 Installation and Maintenance of Utilities. The source for the installation of electric power, PAGE 7OF10 IIIIIII11111.1111112208973 II I III „� Shelley Vance-Gallatin co MT MISe Iae a� 10�Z006 10.68R telephone, and water line service shall exist at the junction of the main access road and Lot drive ways. Owners shall bear all responsibility and costs from such junction to Residences. All utilities of every nature shall be installed and maintained underground. Piping and wiring shall be concealed. Each Owner shall be'responsible for utility installation and maintenance in accordance with state and local regulations. 6.8 Right of Access. A right of access shall be reserved and be immediate for making of emergency repairs in improvements and/or within the boundaries of each Lot. These repairs may be needed to prevent property damage, personal injury, continued property damage, or for any other emergency purpose. 6.9 Dedication to Public Use. Nothing contained in this Declaration shall be construed or be deemed to constitute a dedication, express or implied, of any part of the Subdivision or the Common Areas to or for any public use other than those areas indicated on the preliminary plat application. Section 7. Enforcement. 7.1 Parties That Can Enforce. The provisions of this Declaration may be enforced by the Homeowner's Association, Reviewer, or the Declarant. • 7.2 Action upon Violation. In the event of violation or threatened violation of any provision of this Declaration, or the Guidelines or any other rules or regulation adopted by the Homeowner's Association, legal proceedings may be brought in a court of law or equity for injunctive relief and damages. In addition, the Homeowner's Association, Reviewer, or the Declarant may enforce this Declaration by serving notice in writing on the person or entity violating this Declaration which notice shall specify the offense, identify the location and demand compliance with the terms and conditions of this Declaration. Such notice shall be personally served. Enforcement of this Declaration shall be by proceedings either at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate this Declaration. Such legal proceedings may be either to enjoin or restrain violation of the Declaration or to recover damages or both. In the event of action to enforce this Declaration, the prevailing party shall be entitled to costs and a reasonable attorney's fee. 7.3 Liability and Wavier. The Reviewer, Homeowner's Association, and the Declarant shall not be liable to any person or entity for any entry, self help or abatement of a violation or threatened violation of this Declaration. All Owners, invitees and guests shall be deemed to have waived any and all rights or claims for damages for any loss or injury resulting from such action except for intentionally wrongful acts. 7.4 Failure to Enforce Not Constitute Waiver. The failure by the Declarant or its assigns, the Homeowner's Association, the Reviewer or any Owner to enforce any covenants or restrictions contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver or in any way prejudice the right to enforce this Declaration at any time against any person breaking any covenant or restriction breached thereafter or to collect damages for any subsequent breach of this Declaration. Section 8. Covenant Applicability. All of the real property and Lots, referenced above and described as the Legends Subdivision, shall be subject to the restrictions and covenants set forth herein whether or not there is a reference to the same in a deed or conveyance. A breach of any of the foregoing covenants or PAGE 8OF10 2208973 I(IIIII IIIII IIIII(IIIII I Pala: 8 III of 1(IIIII(IIIII III IIIII(III(III 11l10/2006 10.68R Shelley Vance-Gallatin Co MT MISC 104.00 restrictions shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value upon any Lot or portion of the real property or any improvements thereon. However, this Declaration shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any subsequent Owner who acquires by foreclosure, trustee sale or otherwise, title to property within the Subdivision. Section 9. Property Subject to this Declaration Additions Thereto 9.1 Existing Property. The real property which is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, and occupied subject to this Declaration is located in the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana,and is more particularly described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this Declaration. 9.2 Additions to Existing Property. Additional properties may become subject to this Declaration in the following manner: (a) Additions by the Declarant. The Declarant, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to bring within the scheme of this Declaration additional properties in future stages of development which are contiguous to the lands described in said Exhibit "A." For this purpose, the term "contiguous" shall mean adjacent to or adjoining.The additions authorized shall be made by the execution and formal filing by the Declarant of one or more supplementary Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions with respect to the additional property and by the Declarant filing with the Association a general plan of development for the proposed additions. Unless otherwise stated therein, such general plan • shall bind the Declarant to make the proposed additions. No consent or approval of such supplementary declaration must be obtained from any owner or any parry who may have acquired a security interest in any of the lots, unless a contract or agreement exists requiring such consent or approval. No addition to the properties shall diminish an owner's interest in his lot or living unit, or such owner's voting rights in the Association. (b) Mergers. Upon a merger or consolidation of another association with the Association, the properties, rights and obligations of both associations shall be transferred to a surviving or consolidated association corporation or, in the alternative, the properties right and obligations of another association may be added to the properties, rights and obligations of the Association, which shall serve as the surviving association corporation, pursuant to a merger.The surviving or consolidated association corporation may administer the covenants and restrictions established by this Declaration within the existing property together with the covenants and restrictions established upon any other properties as one scheme. In the event that the implementation, administration, and enforcement of the covenants and restrictions as "one scheme" causes inconsistencies, conflicting provisions, questions relating to voting rights or any other issues, then the Declarant (or the Association, if it has taken control of the Subdivision) shall have the exclusive rigght to adopt written procedures for resolvingand addressing any such issues. The Declarant's (or the Association's) written statement(s , in this regard, shall be controlling in this respect, unless later revoked or amended by the Declarant (or the Association). No such merger or consolidation, however, shall affect any revocation, change, or addition to the covenants established by this Declaration within the existing property, except as hereinafter provided. Section 10. Perpetuity. This Declaration shall continue in full force and effect and shall run with land as legal and equitable servitude in perpetuity unless amended as set forth herein. i PAGE 9OF10 IIIIII 111111111111111111 IN 111111111111111111111111 22@8973QIIIIIIII Shelley Vance-Gallatin Co MT MISC 104.00 • Section 11. Amendments. This Declaration shall remain in effect until amended or terminated. This Declaration, and any portion thereof, may be amended, terminated or supplemented at any time by the execution of a written document containing the terms of the amendment, supplement or termination of any of the covenants, (duly acknowledged by a Notary Public, and recorded with the office of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder), in the following manner: (1) if the subdivision has not been released to the Homeowner's Association, then the Declarant may amend this Declaration unilaterally at any time; (2) if the Subdivision has been released to the Homeowner's Association, then amendment, termination, or sup- plementation of this Declaration shall only occur through a written document executed: by the Owners of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lots in the Subdivision based on one vote per Lot. If one or more Lots has been combined, the Owner thereof shall be entitled to one vote and/or one signature for each original Lot which created the combined Lot. If there is more than one Owner for an individual Lot, each Owner must execute the amendment, supplement or termination document to count for one vote towards the seventy-five percent (75%) total. Section 12. Severability. Captions and paragraph headings are designated herein as a matter of conven- ience. A determination of invalidity of any portion of this Declaration shall not in any manner affect the other portions or provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 13. Homeowner's' Association. The Homeowner's' Association shall be constituted, shall con- duct its business, and shall have the authority and responsibility as provided herein and in its Bylaws. In the event of a conflict between the Bylaws and this Declaration, the Bylaws shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this day of , 2005. • DECLARANT Aspen P tner I, LLC By: (--- James P. McLeod,Manage, STATE OF MONTANA ) ss. County of � ) • On the _day ofjapeared 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personall James P. McLeod, personally known to me (or proved on the basis of sat- isfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same in his authorized capacity. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Prnt Name: for4 e St t of Montana � r •• ��� • Residing at: • eap *:• NOTARIAL My commission expires: SEAL OF..ON�ox` • �����f a iii1�►���� PAGE 10OF10 2208973 IIIIIiIllill11111111111111111111111111 Pape: 10 of 12 - IIIIIIIIIIIII I 11l10/200 III 6 10.66A a �o rma MN� to W A.O N N as NA� tEGENDS' n� o - N � N � C7 N = E - U � y - A A - C at BRIDGER CREEK - > L N THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES a J 4 • P TABLE. OF CONTENTS Cr OVERVIEW................ ....... . . ..... . . .. . .............. .. . ... ..4 SECTION 7 Site Planning ..... ........ .......... ... ..... .....7 W 7.1 Grading ... .. ........ ........ ..... . . ... . ....7 ma SECTION 1 Definitions 7.2 Drainage .. . .......... ... ..... ..... ..... . ....7 C0 16 a 1.1 Subdivision . . ..... . .... ... . . . .... ... . ... ..5 7.3 Driveways . . ............. ..... ..... .. .... ....7 N N 1.2 Home Owners Association . ... ... .. . ....... ... . ..5 7.4 Parking ... .. ........... ..... ..... . .. .. . .. ..8 N 0 a. 1.3 Property Disclosure . . . ... ......... ....... ... . . .5 7.5 Pathways and Residential Sidewalks .... ... .. ... ... .8 N a 1.4 Guidelines .. . .... . . . .. . ....... .. .. ..... . .. . . .5 7.6 Garages .. ..... . .. .. . .. . .8 a 1.5 Bylaws .... .... . . . ... ..... .... ..... .. . .. . . .5 7.7 Foundations . ... ..... .......... ... .. ... ... .. ..8 CW 1.6 Declaration .. .... . . . ... ............. . . . ... . . .5 7.8 Alley Design Guidelines .......... ... ........ ....8 1.7 Lot.... .. . . . . .... .......... .... . ... . ...... ..5 7.9 Alleys-Approved Small Trees............... ... ....9 1.8 Residence .. . ... . ........ .. ... . . ... . .. ......5 7.10 Chimney ..... ........ ... ..... ..... . . ... . ....9 N 1.9 Owner . ... . .... ..... ... .. ... . . ... .. . .. ....5 7.11 Exterior Equipment . ... ... ..... ..... . . .... ....9 E 1.10 Declarant. ... .... .... . .. .. ... .. ... ... .. ... .5 7.11.1 Satellite Antenna ... ................ ...10 E 1.11 Common Area .... . ..... . .. ..... .. ... .. . ......5 7.11.2 Fences... ........ ................. ..10 1.12 Contractor .......... ... ............. ..... ... .5 7.11.3 Pet houses,Runs,and Enclosures. ..... ....11 7.11.4 Recreation,Sports,and Play Equipment... ...12 M� SECTION 2 Preface.. . .... . ... ..... .. ... . ...... . .. ........... .5 7.11.5 Exterior Lighting ..., .......... ....... ..12 2.1 Purpose and Intent.. .. ... . ...... .. . ... ..... ....5 7.12 Landscaping ............ ........... ..... . . ..12 2.2 General Design .... . . ... ... ...... . ...... . ... ..6 7.12.1 Requirements and Restrictions .. ... . ......12 2.3 Amendment and Applicability ..... ..... ...... . .. . . .6 7.12.2 Tree Regulations and Requirements... ......12 2.4 Administration and Enforcement of Guidelines . . .......6 7.12.3 Noxious Weeds and Re-vegetation... .......12 2.5 Building Permits and Compliance Board . . ... . .... ...6 7.12.4 Completion of Landscaping ....... . . ... ...13 2.6 Owner Responsibility ..... . .. .... . ... .. .. .......6 7.13 Temporary Structures ....... ..... ........ ......13 w 2.7 Reviewer/Design Review Board ... .. ... ... ..... ... .6 7.14 Debris and Trash Removal 13 ... . ........... ....... 2.7.1 Successor Reviewer/Design Review Board- 7.15 Construction Activity and Dust ........ ... .. ... ...13 Restatement of Bylaws ....... . ...... . ... .6 7.16 Access,Vehicles,Parking and Equipment .., ..... . ..13 SECTION 3 Applicability.. ... .... . ... .. ........... ..............7 SECTION 8 Hold Harmless Agreement .......... .... ........ ... ..14 SECTION 4 Conflicts and Controlling Authority ..:.. ..... ........ ... .7 SECTION 9 Security......... , . ......... ..... .......... .......14 4.1 Ordinances,Codes,and Regulations ............... .7 4.2 Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions .. ......... . .7 SECTION 10 Hunting......... ... ............ .... .. ..... ... ... .14 SECTION 5 Owner Responsibility . . ................ ..............7 SECTION 11 Design Review Process ...,... .......... ... ..... ....14 11.1 Overview ............. ... .......... ..... ....14 SECTION 6 Review of Construction Plans . .... .... ..... ........ ... .7 11.2 Review Criteria.... ........ ........... .....:14 DESIGN GUIDELINES > PAGE 2 OF 20 Cr m to 11.3 Professional Assistance . ..... ..... ..... ... . .. ..14 ID,a 11.4 Knowledge and Compliance . . . ..... ... . ... . ... . .14 o a 11.5 Review Process ......... .. ...... ... . ... . .....15 N 11.5.1 Pre-Design Meeting ..... . ... ......... .15 v o' 11.5.2 Preliminary Submittal and Review .... .... .15 a 11.5.3 Final Plan Submittal and Review. ..... .... .16 a 11.5.4 Construction Permits and Monitoring .. . ... .17 .a 11.5.5 Final Inspection and Certificate a of Compliance . ... .. . .... ... ..... . ....17 v 11.6 Multiple Units. ... .. ... ... .. ........ ..... . ....18 11.7 Review of Modification .. ..... . .. .. ... ..... . ....18 E 11.8 Variances ... .. .. . ...... .. ..... ........ .....18 11.9 Resubmission .... .... ... .. ..... ..... .... .....19 11.10 Review Fees ... ...... .. ........ ..... ... .....19 11.10.1 Initial Application-New Construction/ Original-Lot Improvement . ... ... ....... ..19 11.10.2 Major Alteration or Addition .. ....... .... ..19 11.10.3 Minor Architectural Modification or Addition . ..19 a 11.10.4 Changes or Resubmission of Approved or �■ Unapproved Plans .. . . .......... .. . . .. .19 , � t N SECTION 12 Submittal Forms Initial Submission Form Schematic Design Review Form Construction Document Review Form Pre Construction Conference and Construction Observation Form Final Approval Form DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 3 OF 20 • • s THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK SUBDIVISION DESIGN GUIDELINES 'a m The purpose of the Legends at Bridget Creek Subdivision Design Property Disclosure. The design review process provides parameters inis�.v N Guidelines, set forth below, is to ensure that all Improvements are compati- relation to improvements of Lots in the Subdivision. Further, it outlines a o ble with the design objectives and overall vision of the development of the chronological review process intended to decrease inefficient use of time in Na Legends Subdivision.The objectives include preserving and enhancing the plan development, and to avoid construction delays or revisions during the ��.6 Bridget Creek corridor setting and creating and maintaining an appropriate building process. 6 and unified design throughout the community. These Guidelines were o c developed to promote consistency with the style of landscape design and WARNING: BEFORE PURCHASING A LOT IN THE LEGENDS architecture that reflects and enhances the image of the area, creates a sense SUBDMSION AND/OR BEFORE IMPROVING SUCH LOT, IT IS of community where neighborhoods foster lasting friendships, and preserve THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF the value of each Owner's investment in this unique community. APPROVAL MUST BE SECURED FROM A GOVERNMENTAL ■� BODY-WHETHER FEDERAL,STATE, OR LOCAL-TO LEGALLY �� n The Le ends Subdivision will consist of a mixture of single and multi-fami- COMPLETE SUCH IMPROVEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT g g GAINING APPROVAL(S) FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERN- ly home sites interspersed with open space,walking trails and parkland, and .MENTAL BODIES FOR AN IMPROVEMENT DOES NOT RELIEVE a a community center is proposed for future development. These Guidelines THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN and procedures are to be used by all persons involved in the construction, REVIEWER'S APPROVAL,AS REQUIRED HEREIN. ACCORDING- renovation, addition, landscaping and/or implementation of any other LY,SECURING THE REVIEWER'S APPROVAL,AS PROVIDED alteration to any Lot or residence within the Legends Subdivision. FOR HEREIN, DOES NOT RELIEVE THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY GOVERN- The Guidelines will be administered and enforced by the terms set forth MENTAL BODIES'APPROVAL(S). herein and in accordance with any procedures set forth in the Legends at Bridget Creek Subdivision Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, the For example, although an Owner may have secured final design approval Legends at Bridget Creek Homeowner's Association formation documents, from the Reviewer, in accordance herewith, the Owner must also meet all and/or the Legends at Bridget Creek Subdivision Property Disclosure. submittal and approval requirements of the City of Bozeman Planning and Please note that the Aspen Partners I, LLC, as the Declarant has specific Building Departments to obtain any necessary building permits. control in relation to the aforementioned documents, and thus, the • Declarant may have the unilateral ability to amend these documents from Legends at Bridget Creek design review process, unless otherwise noted time to time. It is suggested that any potential purchaser of a Lot in the takes place in five steps. For purposes of these five steps, the Reviewer, as Legends Subdivision, and all Lot Owners secure assistance from a legal defined by these Guidelines, the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, professional for purposes of reviewing and understanding all documents the Homeowner's Association formation documents, and the Property relating to the Legends Subdivision. Disclosure, will primarily review any plans for improvement to ensure compliance with these Guidelines. The five steps are set forth in these Summary of Design Review Process. These Guidelines establish a design Guidelines, and it is important that each potential Purchaser, Lot Owner, review process for purposes of implementing the requirements set forth and any professional assisting a Lot Owner with improvements and herein, as well any established by the Declaration of Covenants and construction become familiar with the five-step process. As later noted in Restrictions, the Homeowner's Association formation documents, and the these Guidelines, the Lot Owner must retain competent assistance from an DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 4OF20 i i approved Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer' Soils Engineer 1.8 Residence: An Owner's place of habitation or dwelling and a licensed and bonded Contractor, as appropriate for completion of which is a structure constructed upon a Lot within the improvements and construction,which must be reviewed as stipulated by Subdivision,which structure shall meet the requirements these Guidelines. set forth in the Guidelines, Declaration, Bylaws, and Property Disclosure. (� a. It should also be noted that illustrations of sample residential development o a A 1.9 Owner: The person owninga Lot or Residence in fee Go m plans are available from Aspen Partners I, LLC, the Dev loper/Declarant, simple absolute, individually or as co-owner in any real a upon request. Any such illustrations are intended to convey general design estate tenancy relationship recognized under the laws of N o concepts and are not meant to impose specific plans or design solutions for the State of Montana. N a specific residences. j i 1.10 Declarant: Initially means Aspen Partners 1, LLC. N Again, please review the Design Guidelines, as set forth hereinafter, and -A please be sure that any professional that will assist with the improvement 1.11 Common Area: The portion of the Subdivision over process has ample opportunity to review and understand the provisions of which the Homeowner's Association and Declarant retain N these Guidelines. j control, and the portion of the Subdivision in common ownership among the members of the Homeowner's lE Association. Section 1. Definitions i 1.12 Contractor: Any person,general contractor, subcontrac- tor, firm, association, partnership, corporation, limited lia- 1.1 Subdivision: The Legends at Bridget Creek Subdivision is bility partnership, or limited liability company engaged in `. referred to as the"Subdivision", "Legends", "Legends construction services or performing any type of labor in or g Subdivision" or "Legends at Bridget Creek". around the Residence or Lot. 1.2 Homeowner's Association:The Legends at Bridget Creek Section 2. Preface Homeowner's Association, Inc. I w 1.3 Property Disclosure: This document and amendments 2.1 Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the Guidelines is thereto from time to time. i to ensure that all improvements are compatible with the design objectives and overall aesthetic vision of Legends. . 1.4 Guidelines: The Design Guidelines of The Legends The design objectives include preserving and enhancing Bridget Creek Subdivision, as amended from time to time. the Bridget Creek area corridor. The objectives further include the creation and maintenance of an appropriate 1.5 'Bylaws: The Bylaws of The Legends at Bridget Creek and unified design which is aesthetically pleasing. These Homeowner's Association, Inc. Guidelines are meant to promote consistency between the style of landscape design and architecture and the current 1.6 Declaration: The Declaration of Protective Covenants image of the surrounding area. It is the intention of these and Restrictions of The Legends at Brid4ger Creek Guidelines to create a sense of community where Subdivision, as amended from time to time. neighborhoods foster lasting friendships, and preserve the value of an Owner's investment in this unique community. 1.7 Lot: Any separate, designated parcel within the Legends 2.2 General Design. The master plan for the Legends designated and set apart for the purpose of ownership. contemplates a mix of single and multi-family Residences DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 5 OF 20 • • i interspersed with open space,walking trails and parkland. Guidelines, and have carefully reviewed the Guidelines, A community center is proposed for future development. Bylaws, Declaration, and Property Disclosure. The Legends consist of a mixture of multi-family residen- tial and custom residential structures. A number of illus- 2.7 Reviewer/Design Review Board. The initial Reviewer C trations are included in the Guidelines to assist Owners shall be Studio Architects, Inc. and any review fees shall be N N o . and their consultants in understanding the objectives and paid directly to Studio Architects, Inc. The initial review M`M visions of Legends. These illustrations are intended to fees, as set forth herein, is subject to change at the Go°a: convey general design concepts and are not meant to Reviewer's discretion. The Reviewer shall have the `O.a impose s ecific plans or design solutions. responsibility to review construction, landscaping, and N o P P P g P h' improvement plans to ensure compliance of those plans a o 2.3 Amendment and Applicability. The Guidelines are to be with the terms and provisions set forth herein, in the a used by all persons involved in the construction, renova- Property Disclosure, and in the Declaration. In regard to N tion, addition, landscaping and/or any other alteration to other responsibilities and the future of the Reviewer and any Lot within Legends. The Guidelines may be amended Design Review Board, the following,which is set forth in from time to time by the Declarant, in its sole discretion. the Bylaws,shall control: N = E 2.4 Administration and Enforcement of Guidelines. The 2.7.1 Successor Reviewer/Design Review Board-Restatement Guidelines will be administered and enforced by either(a) of Bylaws. Declarant shall have sole responsibility for the the Declarant or its designee or (b) the Reviewer, in appointment of any successor Reviewer, and for creation 5 accordance with procedures set forth in the Declaration. and operating guidelines of any Design Review Board �. formed by the Declarant. Until a Design Review Board is 2.5 Building Permits and Compliance Bond. No building, created, the Reviewer shall have the sole responsibility for structure, road, fence or improvement of any kind shall be the review requirements of construction and improvements erected, placed, altered, added to, reconstructed or permit- on the Lots, as such is set forth in the Declaration, red to remain on any site, and no construction activities or Property Disclosure and Bylaws. When/If the Declarant � removal of trees or other vegetation shall be commenced elects to create a Design Review Board, it shall replace the t until approved by the Reviewer. A compliance bond may Reviewer and take over the Reviewer's review responsibili- fD be required in the amount of up to $10,000 and if so, it ties. The Declarant shall have sole discretion in determin- - will be held in an escrow account administered by the ing the number of members on the Design Review Board, Reviewer. Upon completion of construction and land- the appointing of those members, the length of the terms • scaping of the sites, the job will be reviewed by the of those members, and all other matters concerning the Reviewer, and when satisfactorily completed, the operations of the Design Review Board, including but not compliance bond.will be released to the Owner. Some or limited to, the election and reelection of said members, the all of the bond may be used by the Reviewer to complete governing body over the Design Review Board (whether unfinished landscaping or other work needed on the site, the Declarant or some other entity or individual). if not satisfactorily completed by the Owner of the site. 2.6 Owner Responsibility. An Owner has the responsibility Section 3. Applicability, These Guidelines, and any subsequent revi- to ensure that they have the most current edition of these sions, are applicable to all construction commenced within the Subdivision, DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 6 OF 20 ��� and any amendments or additions thereto from time to time. to blend with natural contours. Ends of walls are not to end abruptly, but are to create natural looking transitions Section 4. Conflicts and Controlling Authority. with existing landforms and vegetation. Retaining walls are not to exceed 4 feet in height. Where grade change 4.1 Ordinances, Codes,and Regulations. To the extent that exceeds 4 feet,stepped-back or terraced wall structures a the City of Bozeman ("City') ordinances, building code or with ample planting terraces (4-foot minimum width) are I regulations require more restrictive standard than the stan- to be used. Walls exceeding 2 feet in height are to be N a dards set forth in the Guidelines, Bylaws, Declaration, or designed with a minimum 2:12 batter. Shrubs and vinesco o a Property Disclosure, the local government standards shall are to be planted at the base and top of walls to blend with prevail. To the extent that any local government standard the site. The slope of cut and fill banks should be deter (me— is less restrictive, the Guidelines, Bylaws, Declaration, or mined by soil characteristics for the specific site to avoid N a Property Disclosure shall prevail. erosion and promote.re-vegetation opportunities, but in a any case should not exceed 2:1 slope unless it can be N 4.2 Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. In the event demonstrated that a steeper slop will not result in erosion. N of any conflict between the Guidelines and the Natural slopes are to be used instead of structures wherever Declaration, the Declaration shall govern and control. feasible. N Section 5. Owner Responsibility. Each Owner is responsible for 7.2 Drainage. Modifications to existing drainage patterns are F complying with these Guidelines and all provisions of the Bylaws, allowed only if approved by the Reviewer. The Reviewer v Declaration, and Property Disclosure on file in the public records of may require the Owner to submit an engineered drainage �■ Gallatin County, Montana as such documents may be amended from time study of proposed modifications. Owners shall reimburse to time, as well as any applicable agreements, rules and/or regulations the Reviewer for any engineering fees incurred by the entered into or adopted by the Homeowners Association or any applicable Reviewer in reviewing proposed drainage modifications. governing authority. Finished ground surface at the foundation shall grade away o from the foundation. Runoff from impervious surfaces, 5 Section 6. Review of Construction Plans. The Reviewer shall such as roofs and pavement areas,shall be directed to C , review all plans relating to site planning to determine compliance with natural or improved drainage channels or dispersed into these Guidelines. No construction shall commence until the Reviewer has shallow sloping vegetated areas. Site drainage must meet 2- approved the site plan and any other plans related to the construction of a all applicable environmental regulations. Impervious man- Residence or other improvements. made swale linings are not permitted. • Section 7. Site Planning. 7.3 Driveways. The finished floor elevation of a Residence will be dictated by the driveway location and grade. This 7.1 Grading. Grading requirements resulting from develop- relationship must, therefore, be carefully considered when ment shall be designed to blend into the natural landscape. designing and situating the Residence and driveway. The Cuts and fills should be feathered into the existing terrain, construction and maintenance of all driveways shall be the within the property boundary. All retaining walls,which responsibility of the Owner. Driveways shall be crowned are visible from the streets and/or Common Areas, are to and sloped for adequate drainage and safety. Driveways be built of natural or cut stone, laid so as to appear strut- shall be constructed of concrete paving units, stone cobbles tural and not veneered. The tops of walls are to be shaped or concrete. Driveway materials shall restrict weed growth DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 7 OF 20 �� and maintain a clearly defined edge between the land- part of the design of any Residence. Consequently, archi- scaped area and the driveway surface. Driveway materials tectural forms, materials and design details used in the shall withstand deterioration from winter snow plowing Residence's elevation, should be incorporated into all a and erosion. Any other material used to construct a drive garage elevations. The use of decorative garage doors with way shall be approved by the Reviewer. relief or trim compatible with the architectural style of the h`N a Residence is required. It is recommended that the surface 7.4 Parking. Each single-family Residence shall provide for at of the garage door be of the same materials and color as 'a the siding, or other significant exterior detail of the a least 2.5 parkingspaces in size to allow for interior storage and shall be fully enclosed within a garage. For Residences Residences, or natural wood color. N a' that do not have an alleyway, each driveway, not including a 7.7 Foundations. In the interest of creating a close integra- o the garage area,will provide a minimum of four parking a s aces and be attached or semi-attached to the Residence. tion between the Residence and its site and landscape, N P foundations and grading should be designed to give the appearance of Residences emerging from the ground. 7.5 Pathways and Residential Sidewalks. All Owners shall The top of the foundation must be at least 12 inches construct residential sidewalks conforming to City of above finished surface. Finish floor elevations must be at a E.. Bozeman standards on all public street frontages of the minimum equal to or exceed the elevations listed in (See Owner's lot prior to the occupancy of any Residence. appendix A). Materials that are used to finish the con- o However, notwithstanding occupancy,such sidewalk shall crete must convey mass rather than a covering. be constructed no later than three (3) years after the Subdivision plat is recorded. 7.8 . Alley Design Guidelines. Alleys are intended to serve as primary access to garages and secondary access for vehicu- 7.6 Garages. In creating a sense of community, it is impor- lar circulation,service and delivery. Alleys are not antici- tant that the front entry, rather than the garage, dominate pated to accommodate through-traffic.Alleys, located in the front elevation. Consequently, side-loading or recessed back of the rear of each Lot,will maintain the integrity of a garage configurations are required for Residences without the streetscape on the front side of the homes by discour- an alleyway. In most cases, massing requirements will aging the interruption of pedestrian movement along side- t require offsetting of front loading garages. Doors shall be walks and through front-yard driveways.Alleys also elimi- �+ recessed to a minimum of 6 inches in an exterior wall. A nate the visual impact of the garage door on the front yard third garage bay on front elevations is only allowed if as well as possible traffic conflicts associated with vehicles distinctly separated from the other two bays. At least two backing onto busy streets. It is anticipated that alleys will feet of horizontal separation and an appropriate change in eliminate street-side curbcuts,which will enhance the roof line is required. Carports are discouraged, but are attractiveness of on-street visitor parking. In the Legends subject to Reviewer approval, and must be integrated into Subdivision, alleys will be paved to a width of sixteen feet the overall design of the elevation. For Residences that within a twenty foot wide alley right-of-way allowing for a have an alleyway, garages must be placed behind the two foot wide gravel shoulder on each side. The gravel Residence and accessed via the alleyway. Side-loading shoulder will be kept clear for the purpose of enhanced garages are required where feasible to avoid a series of visibility and snow removal during the winter season. protruding garages. Front loading garages should be offset Underground utilities may be located within the alley from the primary structure to meet massing requirements. right-of-way. Garage doors shall be subdued and oriented away from the street, and shall be de-emphasized in the elevation of the As always,each Owner must secure the Reviewer's Residence. Garage elevations and doors are an integral approval of any developments that coordinate the Owner's DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 8 OF 20 � Lot with the alley. However, in order to meet the inten- each Owner must verify that the planting location(s) IMD tions of the alley design guidelines, as set forth in this do(es) not conflict with the alignment of underground r,o a Section, the following are some guidelines in relation to utilities. If you have any questions or concerns in regard `W the construction upon, and improvement of, Lots, so that to whether a planting location is appropriate or if a tree is Go°a each Lot coordinates with its contiguous alley(s): an approved small tree in the Legends, it is advisable to 0 O.,a contact the Reviewer for input. In the Legends N 1. Garage aprons shall be constructed of concrete to Subdivision, the following small trees are approved for use N a a provide a contrasting material to the asphalt in the vicinity of the alley: I a pavement of the alley, N Common Name Botanical Name 2. Apron depth shall be at least 8 feet to conform Japanese Tree Lilac Syringa reticulata to the overall dimensions of the alley, shoulder Schubert Chokecherry Prunus virginiana'Schubert' y and landscape strip, and Flowering Crabapple Malus varieties E Amur Chokecherry Prunus maackii 1K 3. Apron width may vary depending on the width of European Birdcherry Prunus padus the garage door and bays. Ussurian Pear Pyrus ussuriensis Leprechaun Ash Fraxinus i The following is an example diagram of an alleyway in the. Toba Hawthorn Crataegus x mordenensis ;. Legends Subdivision, and it shall provide each Owner with son I an impression of the layout of alleys in the Subdivision,so 7.10 Chimneys. A chimney can be an excellent design feature. as to help each Owner, and assisting professionals,with They are naturally strong elements because building codes preparing plans for construction and/or improvements in require that they be taller than the surrounding roofline. relation to alleys: A careful choice of materials and proportion is necessary to t fully benefit from the chimney as a design element. The Tom • We use of exposed concrete block or exposed stovepipe type �' e � beva-d 6- �FIOWVer chimneys is not permitted. The proportions of the chim- ney should give a substantial, stable appearance. Fireplace z snaA°� and mechanical flues and vents should be consolidated and enclosed within the chimney. All fireplaces and wood 16'Poved AW burning devices must be approved by the United States • Environmental Protection Agency and must comply with any applicable state or local requirements. All chimneys must contain spark arrestors. Owners are encouraged to plumb burning devices for natural gas. 7.11 Exterior Equipment. The following exterior equipment is Alleylllushatlon hp p permitted, but subject to restrictions,within the �. _ Subdivision: 7.9 Alleys-Approved Small Trees. Before planting any small 7.11.1 Satellite Antennas. The following satellite antennas are trees in or near the alleyway or on the alley right-of-way, permitted: (i)A satellite antenna designed to receive direct DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 9OF20 broadcast satellite services, including direct-to-home satel- intended for the purpose of containing young lite services, that is one meter or less in diameter; (ii)A children. Therefore, unless the Owner has young satellitc antcnna designed to rcccive video programming children, all fencing is highly discouraged. Cr services via multipoint distribution services, including m multi-channel, multipoint distribution services, instruc- 7.11.2.3 Privacy Fences. A privacy fence will drastically P.N a tional television fixed services, and local multipoint distri- alter the appearance of a Lot and adjacent Lots. 090 bution services, that is one meter or less in diameter or For this reason, it is recommended the Owner Co a a diagonal measurement; or (ii) a satellite antenna that is discuss fencing plans with adjacent Lot Owners G-o designed to receive television broadcast signals. prior to filing an application with the Reviewer. N o Generally, privacy fencing will not be allowed N CL 7.11.1.1 Satellite Antenna Placement. Placement of a unless a need for such fencing is shown, and a permitted antenna, as provided in section 5.8.1, adjacent Lot Owners do not express substantial g on the rear or side portion of a Residence shall not opposition. require prior approval of the Reviewer, provided such placement does not pose a safety hazard to 7.11.2.4 Existing Fences. If an Owner plans to attach a anyone within the Subdivision. Any permitted fence to an existing fence on a neighboring Lot, or antenna mounted on the rear or side portion of a if the Owner's contemplated fence will at any Residence shall be painted so that it blends into point be on the Owner's property line, or cross the back ground against which it is mounted, the property line onto an adjacent Lot, it is highly provided such painting does not interfere with recommended that the Owner obtain written C reception. While placement of any permitted approval from the Owner of the affected Lot prior antennas on the rear or side portion of a to filing an application with the Reviewer. Residence is desired, in the event an Owner can c, not receive an acceptable quality signal by placing 7.11.2.5 Property Survey- Fences. Owners must deter- o' a the antenna on the rear or side portion of a mine the exact location of their property line and ammmes Residence, the Owner may place the antenna on make sure that any contemplated fence will not > . the front portion of the Residence, provided the encroach upon an adjacent Lot. It is recommend- antenna is painted to blend into the back ed that Owners, who are unsure of their property i ground against which it is mounted, and further line location, have a professional survey completed a provided that placement of the antenna on the to avoid any conflicts. In the event that a fence front portion of the Residence does not pose a is located outside of the Owner's Lot, the Owner safety hazard to anyone within Legends. Rooftop will be liable for all costs associated with reloca- installation is not allowed. tion of that fence, including the cost of a • 7.11.2 Fences-Approval and Restrictions. All fencing is highly professional survey. discouraged and is only permitted pursuant to these 7.11.2.6 Fence Material and Design. Fencing can only be Guidelines and Reviewer approval. made of wood and of an open style design and 7.11.2.1 Front Yard Fences,Gardens and Courts. Front may not exceed three (3) feet six (6) inches in yard fences are strictly prohibited. Fences around height. Fences around tennis courts, sports courts tennis courts, sports courts and gardens are per- and gardens may exceed three (3) feet six (6) mitted provided that the size and construction inches in height provided that the size and type shall have been approved by the Reviewer. construction type shall have been approved by the 7.11.2.2 Rear Yard Fencing. The only rear yard fencing Reviewer. Appropriate fence types include: that is permitted within the Subdivision is fencing DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 10 OF 20 `� � 1. "Open" (non-solid)wood fences, such as impose an obligation upon an Owner to install split rail and horizontal board; rear yard fencing. All fencing must be approved and installed consistent with the requirements set m 2. Low stone walls (when used as an exten- forth in the Guidelines. �.0 1D sion of stone foundations; and �_o 3. Win wall extensions that match building 7.11.2.8 Publicly Visible Fences. Fences and walls visible °a g g from roads, trails, parks, public spaces, and/or materials. o' Common Areas shall be designed with the intent of incorporating N plant materials to cover at least Inappropriate fencing materials/types include: a o a fifty-percent (50/o) of structural components at 1. Concrete block; plant maturity. Fences around tennis courts, n I Chain link; sports courts and gardens may require additional 3. Wrought Iron; detailing and landscape treatments, as specified by 4. Stucco; the Reviewer, to mitigate off-site visibility. N 5. Solid board; 6. Brick; and 7.11.2.9 Privacy Screens. Privacy screens may be used in E conjunction with hot tubs or sunning decks. The o Appropriate Fence Types screening shall be consistent with the overall c design of the Residence. Privacy screens shall not �� y be taller than the edge of the roof eves, and shall 4 not be longer than 24 feet in uninterrupted length. Screen fencing is to be used to block g views of utilities, mechanical equipment, trash enclosures and outdoor work areas, and may extend up to 6 feet in such areas, if the fence is ! �� close to the Residence and does not adversely �� w PICKET L06 RAIL SPLIT RAIL � affect off-site views. In all cases, the side of the fence which is more finished than the opposite side must be construct- ed with the finished side facing out (toward neigh , 7113 boring properties) and the framing side shall face . . .1 Location and Design. Pet houses must be the Owner's Lot. compatible with the Residence in color and mate- rial. Enclosures to confine pets in an area less than the entire back yard must be placed in a loca- 7.11.2.7 Rear Yard Fences-Lots One Through Eight. tion where minimum nuisance and inconvenience Rear yard fencing on Lots one(1) through eight is caused to neighbors, and away from shared (8) on Block two (2), adjacent to Story Mill Road, property lines and living areas of neighborhood shall not exceed a maximum height of three (3) Residences. Generally, this means a pet house, run or enclosure should be located away from feet, six (6) inches tall and shall be of open style only. This section shall not be construed to shared property lines. Consideration will be DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 11 OF 20 � given to maximum size. Kennels and stables are for construction or improvement should specify the loca- prohibited. tion of lighting on the Lot,height of light fixtures above M the ground,wattage and detailed descriptions of the fixtures. m m 7.11.3.2 Chain Link Dog Runs. Chain link fences for dog runs are only permitted if placed inside solid 7.12 Landscaping. co °o privacy fencing, softened by supplemental land- N scaping. Such dog runs must be well screened. 7.12.1 Requirements and Restrictions. Landscaping shall be N.I! performed only as approved by the Reviewer. Landscaping nJ a 7.11.3.3 Underground Pet Fences. Underground elec- can be effectively used to accent driveways,define space, tronic pet retaining perimeter fences are permitted. create"soft" privacy screens, and reduce the visual impact of fences, and sheds. Since landscaping is a design ro 7.11.4 Recreation, Sports,and Play Equipment. Recreational element, consideration should be given to the relationship play equipment should be placed in rear yards whenever between the applicant's Residence and adjacent possible. Consideration should be given to Lot size, Residences. Planting and maintenance of trees and shrubs E equipment size and design and visual screening. Basketball may not obstruct sight lines required along road ways. E backboards shall not be attached to any portion of the Plantings must not block sun to, or views from, neighbor- ° Residence or an associated garage. Play structures cannot ing Lots, reduce air circulation to neighboring Lots, nor exceed nine (9) feet in total height. Consideration as to encroach upon.walkways or block walkway lighting. Shade location, size, impact and noise will be reviewed with each patterns of larger trees and possible physical damage to application. other Lots, by encroaching vegetation or trees, must be c? considered. Owners must select plants which, upon 0 7.11.5 Exterior Lighting. The intent of the lighting restrictions maturity,will be of an appropriate height and width in is to reduce the amount of light pollution and to limit the order to comply with the above stated restrictions. Q obtrusiveness to neighboring Lots. Exterior lighting shall Minimum landscaping requirements include, among other be subdued, understated and attempt to be indirect (when restrictions, that the soil (except in flower beds) be covered N in relation to neighborhood lots). Area lighting shall have with living ground-cover (such as grass) or standard land concealed light sources and shall be all white. Lighting scape material (such as bark)which provides weed,dust,and shall be "down" type and shall not radiate out from the erosion control. Lot. In all cases, excessive glare to neighboring Lots or cir- culation shall be avoided. No halogen lights are permit- 7.12.2 Tree Regulations and Requirements. Pursuant to regula ted. Each Owner shall provide a downcast light at their tions and requirements imposed by the City of Bozeman, drive location. A lighted address sign must be approved trees must be planted in certain locations on each Lot, and and specified by the Reviewer. Exterior building lighting, the trees must be of a certain type and variety. The trees either attached to or as part of the Residence, is only per- must comply with a specific vegetation design plan for the mitted to the extent necessary to provide for general Subdivision,which was established in coordination with illumination,security and safety at entries, patios, outdoor the City of Bozeman. The Reviewer has a copy of this spaces and associated landscape structures. Subtle lighting vegetation design plan. In order to ensure compliance of plant materials may be approved if not visible from off- with this plan and all tree regulations and requirements, site locations and achieved through hidden light sources. each Owner must contact the Reviewer before selecting or Pole-mounted lighting is not permitted. Any application planting trees on the Lot to inquire as to the location of DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 12 OF 20 �� said trees, and the type of trees the Owner must plant. and transported to an authorized disposal site. During construction, each site must be kept neat and tidy to pre- 7.12.3 Noxious Weeds and Re-vegetation. Owners shall control vent it from becoming unsightly or affecting adjacent Lots. a all noxious weeds on their respective Lots and shall destroy The Owner shall be responsible for taking necessary pre them according to county standards. Re-vegetation, as cautions to prevent debris from blowing off the construc- ~a 0 `o u� shall be approved in advance by the Reviewer, shall be tion site and shall clean up any debris blown off the Lot. co a required for all disturbed areas. Natural and native species Any cost incurred by Reviewer in collecting and/or dispos- ".0 are encouraged; non-native species may be restricted ing of construction debris or trash may be assessed against N ii or prohibited and must be approved by the Reviewer the performance bond and, if any portion of such cost is N a before planting.The Owner must complete the restoration unpaid, it shall become a lien against the Lot on which the o of vegetation and landscaping within forty-five (45) days debris or trash originated. N following the construction of the Residence or within such period as may be reasonably necessary as dictated by 7.15 Construction Activity and Dust,Mud and Noise. Each weather conditions. Contractor shall be responsible for controlling dust, mud and noise, including, without limitation, music from the Q E 7.12.4 Completion of Landscaping. Landscaping of the front construction site. Radios, tape players, and similar items, iE yard must be performed immediately upon completion of must be kept at a low level to minimize disturbance to �0 construction. Landscaping of the remainder of neighbors and wildlife. Dirt, mud or debris from S the Lot must be completed within one year of completion construction activity must be promptly removed from of construction. roads, open spaces, driveways or other areas of the Subdivision. o 7.13 Temporary Structures. Temporary structures, such as sanitary facilities, construction trailers, material storage 7.16 .Access,Vehicles,Parking and Equipment. Each . facilities and trash receptacles must be contained within Contractor shall assure.that the subcontractors, employees, the Lot and must not be placed on the Lot more than and suppliers comply with applicable speed limits. t twenty(20) days before construction begins. Under Parking is restricted to areas within the Lot under f0 special circumstances, and with the prior approval of the construction or in areas designated by the Reviewer. Reviewer, construction materials may be stored outside the Contractors are not permitted to park on other Lots or Lot if such storage does not adversely affect the native adjacent Lots without written approval of the adjacent Lot • landscape. Portable toilets shall be located only within the Owner and the Reviewer. Vehicles shall not be parked in a Lot or in an area approved by the Reviewer. All temporary manner which inhibits traffic. Vehicle maintenance, structures shall be removed within thirty(30) days after including oil changes, and cleaning by Contractors, is completion of construction. restricted to the Lot under construction, and all residue must be cleaned. 7.14 Debris and Trash Removal. Contractors must clean up all trash and debris on the construction site at the end of Section 8. Hold Harmless Agreement. The Owner shall hold the each day. Trash receptacles must be adequately sized to Declarant and the Homeowners Association harmless from any claims for handle construction debris. Trash and debris must be damage,and shall be liable to Declarant for any damages to Declarant or removed from each construction site at least once a week Declarant's property, arising from construction related activities involving DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 13 OF 20 `� the Owner's Lot. 3. Additions to fences or enclosures; 4. Renovation, expansion, or refinishing of Section 9. Security. It is suggested that Contractors provide tempo- the exterior of existing buildings, includ- rary security fencing at the construction site. Security lighting may used ing any color changes other than restora- if approved by the Reviewer. Guard animals are not allowed. tion or repair of structures in confor- mance with the most recently 'a .The Legends is located within the City of approved plans for the Residence; and 7 a Section 10.' Hunting. g ty PP P �'-N Bozeman, therefore hunting and the discharge of firearms in the 5. Major site and/or landscape improvements. ii a 24 Subdivision is.prohibited. N0. 6 � 6 Section 11. Design Review Process. 11.2 Review Criteria. In its review process, the Reviewer may 6 consider,without limitation, the quality of workmanship 11.1 Overview. These Guidelines and the design review and design, harmony of external design with existing _ process, set forth below,help create a community structures, location in relation to surrounding structures, u environment within the development and serve to protect topography, and finish grade elevation. Review decisions f each Owner's investment in the Legends by providing may be based on purely aesthetic considerations. The >E certainty in the level of quality and design of structures Reviewer, however, shall not grant approval for a proposed and surrounding landscape throughout the Legends. construction that is inconsistent with these Guidelines, While these Guidelines are intended to provide a frame unless the Reviewer elects to grant a variance. Only the ; work for construction and modifications, these Guidelines Declarant or the Homeowner's Association (when formed are not all-inclusive. Each Owner is responsible for and in operation) has the power and right to overrule any complying with these Guidelines as well as all other variance granted by the Reviewer. applicable provisions of the Bylaws, Declaration, and Property Disclosure, and all applicable local, state, and 11.3 Professional Assistance. Throughout the construction federal codes, ordinances, rules, regulations; and restric- planning process, the Owner shall retain competent i tions in order to bring the design review process to a assistance from an approved architect, landscape architect, prompt and satisfactory conclusion. It is the Owners' civil engineer,soils engineer and a licensed and bonded - responsibility to determine if governmental approval is contractor as appropriate. required for each aspect of their construction, and improvements. Approval by the appropriate government 11.4 Knowledge and Compliance. Upon executing purchase body does not relieve the Owner of the responsibility to documents, all Owners and potential buyers will be obtain Reviewer and/or Reviewer approval nor does deemed to have read and accepted all provisions of the Reviewer and/or Reviewer approval relieve the Owner of Declaration, Property Disclosure, Bylaws, the Guidelines the responsibility to obtain governmental approval. and any other documents concerning the Subdivision. Buyers shall comply with all terms of such documents. The design review process outlined below applies to the following categories of construction: 11.5 Review Process. The design review process is divided into 1. New building construction; five phases: 2. Roads, driveways and site work; DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 14 OF 20 � 1. Pre-Design Meeting/Site Visit; completion of preliminary design meeting, the 2. Preliminary Plan Submittal and Review; Owner or its agent shall submit an Application for 3. Final Plan Submittal and Review; Preliminary Review to initiate review of the a 4. Construction Permits and Monitoring;and proposed design of the Lot, building and land- 5. Final Inspection and Certificate of scaping. A fee will be in association with this Compliance. submission. The preliminary submittals shall a co a include a site plan at a scale no less than 1"= 20" _N 11.5.1 Pre-Design Meeting. Prior to the development of on a 24"x36" or a 30"x42"sheet showing the nj o m construction documents, the Owner or its agent shall locations and areas of ni a' request a pre-design meeting. This meeting may be held a with the Reviewer or its representative. The goal of the 1. the Residence and all other buildings or a pre-design meeting is to discuss the Owner's construction major structures a objectives and the impact of these Guidelines. It is 2. the driveway with the percent of grade suggested that this meeting be attended by the Owner's indicated and parking areas design team and held before any formal design work is 3. decks and patios E begun. No plan materials are required at this time, but 4. recreational facilities s sample designs may be introduced for discussion. The 5. walls and fences o pre-design meeting may be held prior to purchase of any 6. proposed utility services Lot. Pre-design meetings may be waived for Owners or 7. the general location of nearest structures n7n-wmw Contractors who have previously participated in a pre- (if any) on adjacent Lots; and design meeting. This review may include a site inspection 8. elevations of all building floors, patios own== �? to discuss particular building and landscaping and terraces shown in relation to Lot con opportunities for the particular Lot. The scope of the pre- tour elevations. It is recommended that design meeting will include a discussion of the following the Owner or its agent schedule a matters: meeting with the Reviewer to discuss the preliminary plans and answer any y 1. The Legends' approximate property questions about the project. The prelimi- boundaries; nary review will include a site inspection, 2. Easements and utilities; 3. Architectural, site and landscape design and the Owner should have the Lot and guidelines; relevant structures generally located on • 4. Characteristics and design opportunities the site at this time. of the specific Lot; 5. Preliminary design concepts; 6. Design review and approval process; 11.5.3 Final Plan Submittal and Review. 7. Construction process and bonding requirements; and 11.5.3.1 Plan Submittal. After approval of the prelimi- 8. Other considerations and suggestions nary design, the following documents should be related to the specific Lot. submitted to the Reviewer with the Application 11.5.2 Preliminary Submittal and Review. Upon for Final Plan Review: DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 1S OF 20 � 11.5.3.1.1 A duplicate set of complete construction docu- be scheduled in advance and will be held at the ments for the Residence, including building sec- information offices of Legends or any other tions which illustrate the Residence, all utility location determined by the Reviewer. Owners locations, utility meter and transformer locations participating in any meeting will be notified of the (and screening techniques), and any approved meeting time. The Reviewer will send written �' I adjustments to locations. Sample of exterior notification of its action on each design submitted �.N o materials and colors,window and glass specifica- within 30 business days of the receipt of a �o,o tions, and accent items. These shall be mounted completed application. The Reviewers decision to N on an 18"x24" board clearly marked with Owner's shall be in one of the following forms: a name, filing date,and Lot number, and identified with manufacturer's name, color, and/or number. 1. "Approved" -The entire applica- tion as submitted is approved. e 2. "Approved as Noted" -The appli- 11.5.3.1.2 A complete landscape plan at the same scale as the cation is not approved as site plan, showing the entire Lot, indicating the submitted, but the Reviewer's following: all areas to be irrigated; locations, size and species of all trees (greater than four (4) feet suggestions for curing objection- c in height) and all other plants to be added; all able features or segments will be mw X noted. The Owner must correct exterior walks, drives, patios; and other decorative the plants objectionable features features including exterior lighting. A legend or segments, and the Owner may �■ ; using clear symbols and nomenclature must be provided on the landscape plan. A complete be required to resubmit the appli- = grading plan establishing the exiting and proposed cation. ` grade in sufficient detail as may be required by the Reviewer to fully evaluate the potential impact of 3. "Disapproved" -The entire application, as submitted, is the proposed construction,proposed cuts/fills, �. rejected in total. The Reviewer retaining walls or extended foundations. At a minimum, this plan must show the exiting may provide comments but is s elevation of the four (4) corners of the Lot and not required to do so. the finish grade elevations at all building corners. 11.5.3.3 Return of Plans and Written Response. One set It must also describe the exterior lighting plan and of plans shall be returned to the Owner, accompa- • lighting details of lights greater than 254 inches nied by the Reviewer's records and notes. If the high. Reviewer fails to respond within thirty(30) calen- 11.5.3.2 Plan Review. The Reviewer will conduct the pre- dar days, approval shall be deemed to have been given. Any response issued by an Owner in design meeting and reviews of proposed plans during its regular meetings or at such other times reference to issues contained in the Reviewer's notice, following review of submittals, must be as the Reviewer deems appropriate. Owners, architects, or Contractors shall have the right to addressed to the Reviewer in writing. make a presentation at any of these meetings,with timely request to do so. Reviewer meetings will 11.5.4 Construction Permits and Monitoring. DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 16 OF 20 11.5.4.1 Conformity with Approved Plans. Once the 11.5.4.4 Completion. Construction shall be completed plans have been approved, then all work must within one (1) year of its commencement except conform to the approved plans. The Reviewer or when,and for so long as;such completion is its representative will review work in progress dur- . delayed due to causes beyond the reasonable a ing the construction phase. If it is determined by control of the Owner. If construction is not :o the Reviewer that work completed or in progress completed on a Residence within one (1) year, on any Lot is not in compliance with the the incomplete construction shall be deemed to o.a Guidelines or any approval issued by the Reviewer, be in violation of these Guidelines. In the event the Reviewer shall directly or through the of such violation, the Reviewer may notify the o Declarant, notify the Owner and/or Contractor if Homeowners Association, and the Homeowners N a any, in writing of such non-compliance specifying Association may, at its option, either complete the - in reasonable detail the particulars of non-compli- exterior of the Residence in accordance with the o ante and shall require the Owner and/or previously approved drawing, or remove the a Contractor to remedy the particulars of non-com- improvement and return the Lot or Residence to pliance and shall require the Owner and/or its natural state prior to the beginning of any Contractor to remedy the same. If the Owner work. The Owner shall reimburse the and/or Contractor fails to remedy such non-com- Homeowners Association for all expenses incurred pliance or fails to commence and continue dili- in connection with actions taken by the E gently toward achieving compliance within the Homeowners Association pursuant to this time frame stated in the notice, then such non- provision. If the Owner does not reimburse the compliance shall be deemed to be in violation of Homeowners Association within thirty (30) days these Guidelines. of any costs incurred, then all parties agree that the Homeowners Association may place a lien on s ; 11.5.4.2 Commencement. If construction does not the Lot and Residence for the amount of such commence on a project for which plans have been costs. .� approved within twelve (12) months of such approval, such approval shall be deemed with 11.5.4.5 Exception to One Year Completion. drawn, and it shall be necessary for the Owner to Construction on Lots purchased by Builders for resubmit the plans. Construction cannot be resale must be completed within three (3) years initiated until the final construction drawings are after purchase of the Lot. Written approval from approved. the Reviewer is required in order for any construc- tion and/or landscaping to extend beyond the 11.5.4.3 Government Approval. Construction drawings time limits noted above. must also be submitted to the City Building Department after final design approval is obtained 11.5.5 Final Inspection and Certificate of Compliance. from the Reviewer, and the Owner must obtain a The purpose of the final inspection is to ensure building permit prior to commencement of that the project has been built according to the construction. Any modifications required by the submitted design and plans. Upon completion of City must be resubmitted to the Reviewer for any Residence or modification for which final approval. design approval was given by the Reviewer, the DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 17 OF 20 ���� Owner shall submit an Application for Project Inspection Certificate being issued by the Completion Review. Reviewer. Any violation of this section shall result in a daily penalty to be determined by the 11.5.5.1 Inspection. Within such reasonable time as the Declarant or the Homeowners Association. a' .co Reviewer may determine, but in no case exceeding N o thirty (30) calendar days from receipt of written 11.6 Multiple Units. Contractors of multiple Lots within a `o a notice of completion, the Reviewer or its represen- neighborhood may submit multiple plans and specifica- m N tative will inspect the Residence and/or improve- tions for similar floor plans and layout on similarly situat- a ments modification. If the completed Residence ed Lots for pre-approval for an entire neighborhood, in N a or improvement has conformed with these lieu of seeking approval as to each Lot to be built upon. Guidelines and followed the approved plans, the The Reviewer, however, shall require a review of pre- Reviewer will issue a Final Inspection Certificate approved plans for their suitability on specific Lots. To be signifying compliance. If the Reviewer determines pre-approved, the plans and specifications shall show the that such work was not performed in compliance nature, kind, shape, color, size, materials, and location of with the approved Final Submittal and these all proposed structures and improvements. Any changes Guidelines, then,within 30 calendar days of made to pre-approved plans and specifications during the receipt of the Owners' Request for Project construction of improvements shall require approval of the �■ Completion Review, the Reviewer shall notify the Reviewer. Owner in writing of such non-compliance,speci- fying in reasonable detail the particulars of non- 11.7 Review of Modification. The review of any modifica- compliance, and shall require the Owner to reme- tions, including but not limited to,changing of exterior dy the same. Failure of the Reviewer to notify the colors, materials, additions, and structural landscaping Owner within thirty (14) calendar days of alterations of an exiting Residence shall require the sub Owner's non-compliance will not constitute mission of an Application for Modifications Review to the Owner's compliance. Reviewer along with the required review fee. Depending on the scope of the modification, the Reviewer may 11.5.5.2 Failure to Remedy Non-compliance. If upon require the submission of all or some of the plans and expiration of thirty(30) calendar days from the specifications association with the proposed modification. date of such notification by the Reviewer, the In the alternative, the Reviewer may require a less detailed Owner has failed to remedy such non-compliance, description of the proposed modification. The review and the Reviewer shall so notify the Owner. The approval of modifications shall take place within the same Reviewer may take any action to remedy this non-. time periods as required for new construction. compliance as such is provided for in the Guidelines, Bylaws, Declaration, or Property 11.8 Variances. Variances may be granted in some Disclosure. The Reviewer will not issue a Final circumstances (including, but not limited to, topography, Inspection Certificate until there is full natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic or environmental compliance with these Guidelines. considerations)when deviations may be required. The Reviewer shall have the power to grant a variance from 11.5.5.3 Occupation with Final Inspection Certificate. strict compliance in such circumstances, so long as the No Residence shall be occupied without the Final variance does not result in material violation of the DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 18 OF 20 Guidelines. No variance shall be effective unless in 11.10.3 Minor Architectural Modification or Addition. writing. As previously noted, only the Declarant or the The review fee for a minor architectural modifica- „ Homeowner's Association (when formed and in operation) tion or addition- any architectural changes which has the power and right to overrule any variance granted require architectural review and approval as setW. by the Reviewer. forth in the Guidelines, Bylaws, Declaration, or 14,N o Property Disclosure but for which a governmental a to 11.9 Resubmission. Any Owner shall have the right to resub- building permit is not required. (For example, COa, mit the information, documents and fees set forth above; changing the exterior color scheme of the G_Na however, such resubmission shall be considered only if the Residence or installing landscaping which deviates N o from the approved existing landscaping plan) shall Owner has modified the proposed construction or modifi- cation N a a cation or has new information which would, in the be fifteen dollars ($15). N Reviewer's opinion,warrant reconsideration. In the case o 11 10 of a disapproval and resubmission, the Reviewer shall have . .4 Changes or Resubmission of Approved or ten(10) calendar days from the day of each resubmission Unapproved Plans. Changes to or resubmission to approve or disapprove any resubmission. The filing of a of approved or unapproved plans shall be fifty N resubmission does not extend any maximum time period dollars ($50). This fee may be waived or reduced F for the completion of any new construction modification. at the Reviewer's discretion if the review of the resubmission requires a minimal amount of time. 11.10 Review Fees. When an Owner or Contractor submits a Preliminary Plan application for Review on a project, the submission shall include a"Review Fee." The Review Fee, which is subject to change at the Reviewer's discretion, is o payable to the Reviewer consistent with the following amounts: 11.10.1 Initial Application-New Construction/Original t Lot Improvement. The review fee for new Residence construction, or the original improve- ment of a Lot shall be two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for first project submitted by an Owner or Contractor; and one hundred dollars ($100) for each subsequent submittal by same Owner or Contractor. 11.10.2 Major Alteration or Addition. The application fee for a major alteration or addition-a structural or site modification significant enough to warrant the issuance of a building permit by a governmen- tal authority-shall be one hundred dollars ($100). DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 19 OF 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed.this day of , 2005. Cr �. DECLARANT: N N .a M Aspen Pa ers I, LLC N r By :- James P. M eod, Manager a � m N STATE OF MONTANA ) �. U Ss. N County of ) o U On the day of , 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared James P. �'S McLeod, personally know to me (or proved on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same in his authorized capacity. WITNESS my hand and official seal. C A �N� �:, D Y'S':��f,//;Notary Public fo he Scate of on i s t [ Aid•• faint Name: •MOpAR,AL Isiding at:SEAL :,may commission expires: 'a'� do OF DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 20 OF 20 INITIAL SUBMISSION FORM Date: Goals: •Applicant shall be familiarized with the process and the ACC shall be Cr Lot#: familiarized with the applicants anticipated schedule. . Owner: •The applicant shall initiate interpretations of the Design r N Guidelines as they relate to the specific site. o o �w . . o •A design professional shall be prepared and familiar with the N a Name(s) Guidelines and the Covenants. o 0 Na Submission Requirements: Mailing Address for Correspondence •Attach required Post Bond$ N •Attach anticipated project schedule with review and inspection dates. •Submit three(3)copies of Initial Submission forms for review. City State Zip U) •Submission is free of charge � .. Allow fourteen(14 days for review by the ACC from date of submission.) iE Daytime Telephone Number 00 Documents Submitted: Post Bond Architect: Project Schedule Name(s) Submitted By: >` Mailing address for Correspondence Owner/Architect Date N City State Zip Daytime Telephone Number �Dale,!�plecelued Fax Number Date Rwe�do- � � MiiiewedBy � ` — LEGENDS .r BRIGGER CREEK�+iild SCHEMATIC DESIGN REVIEW FORM Date: Goals: •Integration of building to site based on a survey prepared by a licensed surveyor. m Lot#: •Conformance with design guidelines recommendations and requirements. /�CD ■ ,.!N9 Owner: Submission Requirements: •Architect and/or Owner to submit site design and elevation sketches for 0 N a review. Plans and elevations to be to scale and show enough detail to indicate N Name(s) topography at 1'contours and to address proposed grading,massing and Ndo Building Envelope. a a •Building Enveloppe,roan to be at least 1"=20'-0"or larger and the site plan to a Mailing Address for Correspondence be at least 1"=50' 0"or larger. �� N •The proposed Building Envelope shall be staked for review on site. Goals are to review the proposed proJJect's location,integration,and design for the City State Zip particular ulark all,trees to be emovlocateions and design,retaining walls,etc. Applicantshall N = E •For disapproval,the ACC will provide the applicant the basis for disapproval. •Submit three(3)copies of Schematic Design Review Forms for review. c Daytime Telephone Number •Attached review fee of$50. •�.� Allow thirty(30)days for review by the ACC from date of completed submission or com- Architect: pleted building staking,whichever is late. Documents Submitted: itelan • Name(s) Floo PPlan(s) am= All elevations of main house, including garage Additional perspectives,sketches,etc. Mailing address for Correspondence Submitted By: City State Zip Owner/Architect Date Daytime Telephone Number k,gt ateuReceiiied Fax Number � DBRUSeWetl �Kievlewed LEGENDS BRIDGER CREEK—stew CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT REVIEW FORM Date: Goals: •To ensure that the design meets the Design Guidelines and the covenants. Lot#: •To review the final material selections and colors,and final building and site design. Owner: a m Submission Requirements: fa Name(s) a LO •Architect and/or Owner to submit a full set of Construction Documents and a color co is board for exterior materials and finishes before bidding. on.N N a Mailing Address for Correspondence included Exterior lighting fixtures fixtdurecations must be indicated. Cut sheets should be a a •Applicant shall submit supporting information for International Dark Sky Association N compliance. City State Zip •For disapproval,the ACC will provide the applicant the basis for disapproval. N •Submit three(3)copies of Schematic Design Review Forms for review. v Daytime Telephone Number •Attach review fee of$500. Architect: Allow thirty(30)days for review by the ACC from'date of completed submission or com- g pleted building staking,whichever is late. w Documents Submitted: Name(s) Construction Documents Exterior lighting fixture cut sheets C International Dark Sky Association forms Mailing address for Correspondence p Submitted By: City State Zip N Owner/Architect Date Daytime Telephone Number A" DatexRecel le r Fax Number DateRev�e ed' i "n. F ° LEGENDS .BRIDCER CREEK�w�s PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFRENCE FORM Date: Goals: •To minimize the impact of the construction activity on existing topography,landscape,and Lot#: adjacent owners. Owner: •Protect neighboring owners form construction activity nuisance. m i�NO Submission Requirements: o Name(s) •The applicant shall stake stagging areas,install temporary construction and tree co n N protection fencing,mark trees to be removed,locate access points,and scheduled o working hours. Mailing Address for Correspondence •Submit three(3)copies of Pre-Construction Conference forms for review. a •Attach review fee$100.(includes additional site visit during construction) City State Zip Notify the ACC fourteen(14)days prior to the Pre-Construction date. ' Allow thirty(30)days for review by the ACC from date of completed submission or com- Daytime Telephone Number pleted building staking,whichever is late. ; Documents Submitted: wmmn� Architect: Construction Documents Exterior lighting fixture cut sheets International Dark Sky Association forms Name(s) a Submitted By: Mailing address for Correspondence Owner/Architect Date t � N City State Zip Daytime Telephone Number a _ • �l)UI0.•L+� efAYio- .(µ��: Fax Number Da`e'QReV� Te �` Reule ed Bye R � 01W� CIO�Ie_4 LEGENDS s •1BRIDCER CREEK—st1w FINAL APPROVAL FORM Date: Goals: •To ensure completed work conforms to the approved Construction Documents. Lot#: Owner: Submission Requirements: •Landscaping,site work,and all exterior finishes must be installed and finished. The ACC will examine access roads and site grading for additional site remediation required to Name(s) limit the impact of the improvements on the site. •For disapproval,the ACC will provide the applicant with a Notice to Conform. Mailing Address for Correspondence •For approval,the ACC will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Concurrent with issuances of the Certificate of Compliance,the ACC will release the bonds to Owner and Contractor. o,� •Attach review fee of$100. con N City State Zip Notify the ACC fourteen(14)days prior to the Final Approval meeting date. Nay a Allow thirty(30)days for review by the ACC from date of completed submission or com- a Daytime Telephone Number pleted building staking,whichever is late. n Documents Submitted: Architect: Construction Documents Exterior lighting fixture cut sheets International Dark Sky Association forms Name(s) Submitted By: Mailing address for Correspondence Owner/Architect Date . c City State Zip >' Daytime Telephone Number s e s s = N �DateRecel�etl �� F Fax Number � � �� Date Revlered ;� � .� ' LEGENDS d BRIDCER CREEK-.Wkw FILE PIo.221 Olill '06 11:0ID:MT SEC OF STATE FAX:40E 3976 PAGE li 6 SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF MONTANA • BRAD JOHNSON OF Montana State Capitol Secretary of State PO Box 202801 Helena,MT 59620-2801 FAX COVER SHEET4 To• Datsopoulos MacDonald&Lind .Date:'; . ' ;1/°1 l%ZL i• Attu Cindy Smith ;f. . ! ` Fax�6: (406)543-0134:: I ; Pagers 17,'inelµding this cover sheet. I i �I I From: Roberta Rehbeiri ii j Subject: The Legends at Bridgercreek Homeowners Association Inc ' ' The attached verifies the filing of Articles of Incorporation.Original letter to follow by regular mail. ,.l t' : CI:! t i}# it . SI , i • I F i '2•��:: Reception:(406)444-20;44-Business Services Bureau:444-3665-Elections Bureau:444.4732 Administrative Rutes Bureau;444-2055-Records Management Burcau(1320 Bozeman'Avenue):444-2716 � ' ih' ?kil '`, '11.' F mt•us/sosl 0x:444-3976 http'l/WwW.stsitc .l, .. .. ' j t >p'� �li,�'.I,{ �. II,`:i•'t ;;{ .111;.!(,l is ,' 'I.' .. .I I. FILE No.221 Ol i i 1 '06 11 I D MT SEC OF STATE FAX 40 3976 PAGE. ' 2 6 I:. 06 AM FAX NO:.�AO U134U.11 J�N-10-�008 TIDE 08 >l< L PC I �.i I I, � � .yII •ii� �, ,: I ,�111AN� 18 �JlIIII NI � � � �� ;.'� �9,FIL ""� �II ; j i STAYS OF MONTaN ,..; ARTICLES OF INCORPOYtATION JAN 10 2006 ! °r IORITY SECRETARY OF STATE Y.EGENDS AT BRIDGERCREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,INC. r: The undersigned,for the purpose of forming a corporation(hereinafter referred to as the "Corp ration")pursuant to the provisions of tho Montana NW-Profit Corporation Act, § 35-2- 101 of seq.,M.C.A.,adopts the following Articles of Incorporation:. Article X. ��ii ; � d:•ii'i Irai"`: ;ire ': The npno i of the corporation s The Legends at Bridgercieek iiodaeowncrs Association �P tl_, �1 i •, it i 1no-' ,:h rainafter,called thn"Associdtioii." I �•I•�is it 'ti''I It'f�;,I;''�:t�.I i;_ .'•j, Article IT. It' Mtdr<al.�¢nef:t Corporation - ; ;: The corporation is a mutual benofit corporation. j 'i Article Im ` hincipal Qfflce. o principal office of the Association is located at 430 N.Rymm 2nd Fir,Missoula, Montar a 59802, Article IV. ! Reotered Agen< o registered office ofthis Co oratio shall be 201 W. gist T n Main St:.Ste.201.Missoula;.: T MT 598 02,and the registered agent at that address shall be Iliad X Huse. Ted A. Huse ARTIM. OF INCORPORATION P.1 49,Fl OF S THE i-gw NOS AT BRID139RCREEK HOMBOWN&IS ASSOCIATION,►NC. RECEIVED TIME JAN. 10. 8:'07AM FILE No.221 01/11 '06 11: ID:MT SEC OF STATE FAX:40e�a 3976 PAGE 3i 6 JAN-10-2008 TUF 08:06 AM�& L PC FAX N0, 40 0134 F. u4/U i Article V. Purpose and Powers of the Association This Association does not contemplate peaursiary gain or profit to the members thereof, and e spcoihc purposes for which 10s formed are to provide for ai144'tcnanco,preservation and management of the prope located ui'Csallatin County Mortaii`� -lm'owiz as the"Cage s rtY :., �- nd a a j ildgi ircrcdle'prbpeM, and to pr000to the health,safety AN welfare bf the residents within the,;: I. isbove 4waribed propmty and for this purpose to: a. Exercise all of the powers and prIvilego ad to perform all of the duties and obligations of the Association as set forth in that oertaln Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the Legends at Blidgercareek Homeowners Association, (hereinafter called the"Declaration"),applicable to the property and to ba recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,Montana, • and as the same may be amended from time to tune as the e provided, therein p vided,the , ,...y,i Declaration and amendments being incorporated herein as if set forth at longtti a b., Fix,levy,collect and enforce p yment by any lawt ijnu ens,all charses or '.II IS!.:� .;j:;�, � I '1�i�s;.� S•Ir i.g':e-.:,,� assessments pursuant : . ' p uant to the terms of tha:Aecltiraion,to:pay all expenses therewith and all other expenses incident to the oonduct of the business of the Association,including all licemea,taxes or Sover=' u6htal elulrges lervied or is imposed ugalnst the property of the Association. ; U. Acquire,hoed,improve,build upon,operate,tnairitaut;convey,sell,lease, transfer,dedicate for public use or otherwise dispose of real or-personal property in connection with the affairs of the Association in accordance with the Declaration. i. AAT1C OPXNCOpORATION THR Lcc nS AT HKIDORRCRBBK IIOMWO PACB2 OF S VVlN61tS ASSOCIAT10Nr INC. I., .i � i i��' �;;i' 'a�;>'.�• I :� �i� �: � i''jf.` �•, �..;�� :is ±� ' ICI: il .;: a •i ''> •; �+ ! a �' t, _,I �,i.' i� ,�: i �r•'`t I ,r,,�;!ipir Qi.�l ';In RECEIVED TIME JAN. 10. 8 U(M FILE No.221 01/11 '06 11:0 ID:MT SEC OF STATE FOX 40 3976 GE � FAX N0.'i 409SR on I• ::I: ,IAN-10-2006 TUE 08 O6 Aft R'Pf & [ PC i N.;I viu i I:, i '. i. ' '• .I:aaq !` :�, .Ilk.,i:' I+I r,•.'�'�i' d: Exercise all rights and privileges set forth in and provided by the Declaration of Covenants. e. Have and exercise any and all powers,rights and privileges which a corporation i organized under the laws of tho state of Montana by may now or hereafter hava or exercise. Article V1. Membership � : .. ; The Association will have members. Every person'or en City who is a record owner of any lot w'bin the property shall be a member of the Association. rho foregoing is not intended to :;! D ply IYI g' g ' .I i I, i .q I:.;hi'�':Ij 11��::�.;' •' I1 7 :i ll, I kr.li'i•.: !.;,C q ::i�! lncl a persons of(m tiat who hold'an interest memly as sec ty for 4t d perfbri tance`oran obligi tion. Ownership of a lot shall be the sole qualification for memboMiip. Membership, ! � it•• I :; 'I ,� �: :. `I votirg shall be limited to.one(1)votd per lot. I Article'VU. Dissolution , Tho Corporation may be dissolved with the assent given iu writing and signed by not less than n•nety percent(90%)of the voting lot owners. Upon the dissolution of the organization, other I han incident to tperger or consolidation,the assets of the Corporation shall be tranted, convoled and assipted to any nonprofit corporation,association,trust or other organization to be' I i J:. devo d to such similar purposes,or shall be distributed to the fedatal' ovctnment or to a state p � S i � 'dl hoc overnmen for An uch assets not' is cacti of161I ! or l g t, r the public purpose. y a sp shall be disposed i 'r I• ;f�,� i:,:'. _! I ..;• is , .� ,i.y •� � i. ;Yif• by the Dis ctCo of a tY A p I` rg ti I' kl,i.is.` . , hi un the coup fn'whioh the c le af'ficis f the o anixa on is thou •I j` local I,exclusively for the purposes or to such organization or organlzaaons,as said court shall d'etolne,which are organized'and operated exclusively for such purposas. k gi i :AKrICL 23 OF INCO"ORATION I PA063OPS THE LEI 9NDS AT DRIDQERCRIZEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,INC, i� • RECEIVED TIME JAN. 10, 8:07AM j FILE No.221 01/11 '06 11: ID MT SEC OF STATE FAX:40 4 3976 PAGE 5i 6 p� �1 A1°[ & L PC FAX NO, 40 0134 P. 06/07 JAN 10 2006 TUE 08� , i I Article VCY1. Duration I;. :��. .I I •'is i �t l:�:i The period of existence of this Corporation is in perpetiutr front, and after, the data of Y ' 1'I!'.;!: filing f these Articles of incorporation ee a ti with the S r iary of Sta of Montana unless•dissolved ;I.i in arc rdance'with law. Ri Amendment to these Articles shall require the assent of at least seventy-five percent (751%) f the voting lot owners. Article X. : Incorporator he name and address of the.incorporator is James P.Corriek,whose address is 430 N. Rym 2nd Fir,lWssoula,Montana 59802. ; Article X1. I I q l l,•'' ' t,, ' Earnings of the Ong J�^�AQnIGQ1ivn o part of the net earnings of the organization shall`ir'ure'to'}the beAefit o or. be I j , distdbu able to its members,`'trustees,` officers, i or other' polv)ate` persons, except that `il i; � ; I � T. �I J ' 1 .. 11;}I� •„I i i } I I I.:�! '!1 �•��i��� ( ' organiz ion shall be authorized and 'etupowered to pay reasonable 1 compensation for semoes reMcrac and to'make payments and distributions in fort wgnco of the purposes stet forth in the purpose clause hereof No substantial part of the activities of the.organization shall be the • eairying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and the organization shall ao .participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution of statements) any polit cal campaign on behalf of any candidate for public offtoe.: ARTiCLics DFINcoRpORATIoN P4C6400S ! :a'y, I ':! �i:!4,'.•4r ' THIZL6Ag U3A'1'Ort1AQA'tt�.rZFiFiKtiQMEOWNRR9AS90ClATIQNrJNC. i!'' � I :i � I!.. lI:. ,, I:i 4 mf I ! j °; RECEIVED 'TIME JAN. 10. 8 07AM' J1 . . . i : 97 6 PAGE.No.221 Oliil '06 11=1 ID�MT SEC OF STATE FAX I'I 6"��'.6 A -10-2006 TUE 08�OT AM i N0 4 0134 , �? i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,for the pis=poso of fomiing this corporation under the laws of . : . the att to of Montana,the undersigned has executed these Articles of Yncorporation this 60t L— day o ee.n 2006. B P. L (i Y� am®s I'..Corrick,Incorporator li I I State fMontana Cori of Ivfwoula' On this 4t&_day of 2606, before i a Notary Public for the: i State f Montana, personally appeared before me 7amos P. Conick, known to me to bs the ' I j person whose n=e is subscribed to'the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he ' r execu ed the same. ii F i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day d year first above written. . k�, 'RIOT q'm;SA Notary Public for the Stated Montana (S$ Residing at: ►,�gu (ju, n 4 J • SRA r_ e My commission expires: 69410, noA .j. 3 I ARTICI 29ORINCOR'PORATION. PAGESOPS Tile LE GENDS AT SRIDGERCREEK HOMROWN91iS ASSOCIATION,INC.' RECEIVED TIME JAN. 10. 8:01AM I • 17 Master Park Plan 7 • GG E,, DS I :571 at END-S II AT BRIDGE CREEK I SUBDIVISION M-FOR: LLC 430 ND FLOOR MISSOU` A, O 'T 9802 PREP R D Y: -beaks t0 Plains >515nC _ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE!PLANNING/ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN f EAKS TO PLAINS N�P.C. 208 N. BROADW� Y,S TfE 350 BILLIN S,�M�O 59101 406�294.949� FA 406'256.7 23 tE GG ,� PAR'lKC, at END'S II AT BRIDGER CREEK SUBDIVISION i PREP 'RJ..D FOR: F�DG L SLED, L L C 430 .` �I�, ND FLOOR MISSO A, O' 'T "rA 9802 PREP D 'Y: Peaks to Plains >si�R� I __ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE f PLANNING!ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN EAKS�O PLAINS,rD IN" P.C. t' 208 N:BROADA�Y `TEE 350 BILLIN S, MO 59101 . 406.2944 499� F 6,7 Legends II at Bridger Creek Subdivision Contact List Developer: Brownstone Capital, Inc. Contact: Jim McLeod 2135 Charlotte Street, Suite 1B Bozeman, Montana 59718 (406) 541-9000 Landscape Architect Peaks to Plains Design. P.C. Contact: Jolene Rieck, ASLA 208 North Broadway, Suite 350 Billings, Montana 59101 (406) 294-9499 Civil Engineer Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Contact: James Ullman, P.E. 901 Technology Boulevard Bozeman, Montana 59718 (406) 587-0721 ` • _ ` LEGENDS AR AT D►C 'E� CR - 0 • TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORY......................................................................................................1 SUBDIVISION DESCRIPTION..............................................................1 PARK LAND ELEMENTS.........................................................................2 LEGENDSPARK..........................................................................................................2 SOCCERFIELD ............................................................................................................2 COMMUNITYCLUBHOUSE.....................................................................................2 PARKING LOT& CIRCULATION AT CLUBHOUSE.............................................3 PLAYGROUND ............................................................................................................3 TRAILHEAD AT LEGENDS PARK............................................................................4 SITE FURNITURE........................................................................................................4 BRIDGER CREEK TRAIL.........................................................................4 SEATING AREA AT BOYLAN ROAD AND NORTHVIEW STREET.........................................................................................................5 FRONT YARD COMMON OPEN SPACE ............................................5 IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ..........................................................................5 HERBACEOUS VEGETATION...............................................................5 SOCCERFIELD ............................................................................................................5 IRRIGATED LAWNS....................................................................................................6 NON-IRRIGATED LAWNS.........................................................................................6 WOODY VEGETATION...........................................................................6 MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................8 RESPONSIBLE PARTY................................................................................................8 MOWING AND WATERING......................................................................................8 FERTILIZATION..........................................................................................................8 NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL ..................................................................................9 SNOWREMOVAL .......................................................................................................9 PLAYGROUND INSPECTIONS.................................................................................9 ANIMALCONTROL.....................:..............................................................................9 IRRIGATION SYSTEM..............................................................................................10 APPENDIX SITE PLAN AND ZONING PHASING PLAN UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS CRITICAL LANDS REPORT SOILS INFORMATION COST ESTIMATE &REPONSIBILITY DESIGNATION OVERALL MASTER PLAN DRAWING is LEGENDS PARK DRAWING LEGENDS PARK AT BRIDGER CREW HISTORY Bridger Creek begins life atop steep and snowy ridges. It scrambles down canyons and bowls, dropping a mile before it skirts the southern flank of the Bridger Mountains. At last it wanders through a fertile plain,where it gives rise to fields of purple Lupine and yellow Balsamroot. The Nez Perce, Sioux, and Crow camped at this place on their way to hunt buffalo. They named it the Valley of the Flowers, and they told legends of a maiden spirit who protected it. The entire northern edge of the Legends is a half- mile stretch of Bridger Creek, home to willows, cottonwoods, beavers, trout, kingfishers and owls (to name a few). To protect the creek's wildlife, a riparian zone extends 75 to 100 feet out from the banks. Residents need only walk across Story Mill Road to get to the 18-hole Bridger Creek Golf Course. The course is open to the public for golf. With the winter snows, it becomes a cross-country ski course. Those who follow the walking trail east past the golf course will arrive at the East Gallatin Recreation Area, an area with hiking trails. A stream and a lake make it a hotspot for birdwatching, most notably Western Meadowlark, Kingfishers, Red Tailed Hawks and Blue Heron. SUBDIVISION DESCRIPTION Legends II at Bridger Creek encompasses approximately 57 acres of site area, with under half of that acreage in developable area. The housing consists of single family homes built on two different types of lots. There are approximately 66 conventional 7,000 square feet to 13,000 square feet lots. Approximately 60 lots will front onto green space corridors or open space tracts and not a street. The automobile access for these properties is from a 31 foot back of curb to back of curb City Standard Street. Additionally 19 lots are restricted size lots (RSL) to 5,000 square feet, which allows for affordable housing. Over 23 acres of the site area is dedicated to park and open space. These acres are distributed throughout the subdivision. The main active recreation park, Legends Park, consists of 7.17 acres (which includes an actual park dedication of 4.35 acres) and is located in the northwest corner of the site. Legends Park will consist of soccer fields, a community clubhouse, a parking lot, playground and trail head. Heading east along Bridger Creek is another 10.5 acres of open space that consists mainly of trails and tree plantings. This area protects the riparian corridor and continues the trail corridor along Bridger Creek. Areas designated as open space 14 and 15 provide the entry corridor into the subdivision and consist of over 1.7 acres of open space. Remaining open space areas 1 function as common residential front yards, a unique feature of the subdivision layout. PARK LAND ELEMENTS LEGENDS PARK An active recreation park will be placed in this subdivision and is to be named Legends Park. The existing features of the site include Bridger Creek on the north boundary, existing mature vegetation along the east boundary and an existing topography that naturally lends itself to the proposed activities. SOCCER FIELD In the naturally occuring "bowl," a regulation- j T sized soccer field will be constructed. The field, primarily targeted for Junior High level of play fits itself nicely into the existing topography. In addition, the site will be graded to allow for the extra width necessary for High School level of play, too. The soils will be a minimum of 12 inches deep and will be amended and prepared to accommodate the intense active use and drainage. Spectator areas are available on all sides of the field, with the exception of the west edge. A concrete spectator area will be placed on the south side. An earth berm will be placed on the east edge and a flat open space area will be on the north side. This field will be a non-lighted facility. COMMUNITY CLUBHOUSE In this park area is a separate in-parcel designated for the private neighborhood com- munity center. The facility will be an architecturally designed building, built with a slab on grade and is located at the high point of this park site. The clubhouse will require domestic potable water, sanitary sewer, electrical, gas and fiber utility connec- tions. An easement is in the plat to allow for those items. Preliminary Program: Lobby Cloak Room Community Room with Partioning System Kitchen Men's Restroom Womeri s Restroom Exercise Room Office Janitorial/Supply Storage (Chairs, tables, misc.) Mechanical/Electrical Room Meri s Public Restroom Womeri s Public Restroom Circulation 2 LEGENDS PARK AT BRIDGER CREW'. 0 0 PARKING LOT& CIRCULATION AT CLUBHOUSE This active recreation area will have a 23 stall off-street • parking lot. The parking lot will be accessed off of / Boylan Road with two entries and exits. The parking lot ' will be outlined with curb and gutter and paved with asphalt and will have at least 2 handicapped accessible parking stalls. The parking lot will be accessed with an 8-foot wide concrete sidewalk that will provide access to the clubhouse and to the trail head. Other ��— pedestrian circulation will include a 6 foot gravel trail that connects the clubhouse to the soccer fields and to the Bridger Creek trail corridor. PLAYGROUND The playground is situated in a location that provides for safety, security and convenience. The location allows users of the clubhouse to view the playground from the inside the building. In addition,the high vantage point allows parents to view the soccer fields from the playground or vise-versa. The playground is surrounded by a thickened edge concrete and the safety surfacing will be the engineered wood fibers as required for safety and ADA. All playground equipment on City property must be approved by the Parks Department, be inspected by a Certified Playground Safety Inspector(CPSI)and meet ASTM F1487-01, CPSC and ADA guidelines and specifications. Playgrounds shall be age appropriate for area served, and j be signed accordingly. There must be an adequate use zone + area around equipment, approved material in use zone, which meets impact attenuation criteria as specified in ASTM 1292, and adequate drainage. All installation plans, materials list, construction guidelines, maintenance information and manufacturer's name will be. supplied to the City of Bozeman s Parks Division upon completion of playground installation. All installation of play equipment will be overseen and approved by a CPSI. The playground equipment will include equipment for tots (ages 2-5) and school-age children (ages 5-12). The tots are located in the smaller area, closer to the building and facility. Evergreen trees buffer the playground from the Bridger Creek trail, providing additional safety by separating the two uses. • 3 0 0 TRAILHEAD AT LEGENDS PARK A trail head will be located on the east side of the clubhouse. This trail head integrates with the public restrooms on the club house, in addition to outdoor seating and a bicy- cle rack. The trailhead will provide an informational kiosk, space for posting neighbor- hood fliers and information on interpretative features found throughout the trail. Also located in this area will include pet refuse collection systems. SITE FURNITURE ` Throughout the park area, site furniture will be placed in appropriate locations and includes benches, bicycle racks, trash receptacles and _y-- bleachers, etc. The site furniture will be made of durable, vandal- resistant materials. BRIDGER CREEK TRAIL Several interpretative features regarding the history of the land,wildlife, vegetation, river corridor, wetlands, etc., will be placed along the trail corridor that parallels Bridger Creek. These interpretative features will be marked by signage that allows for viewing of trail users. The interpretative signage content should be a coordinated effort between ... the City of Bozeman, the Developer and local user groups of specific interests. This trail corridor will be constructed to the City of Bozeman t gravel trail standards, as demonstrated below. In the winter, this corridor will be part of the popular cross-country ski trail and will be maintained similar to the nearby trail corridors. The open space area that runs from Northview Street to the east edge of the property and includes t 4°to 6'depth of of 318'minus the Bridger Creek trail will be gravel with 20%aay binder edged with hedgerows of native 2%az�i Cotoneaster, Lilac and Caragana shrubs. These shrubs will be planted as very small size stock Water and roll surface to provide_95% moo compaction and form sth'surface seal but once mature; will provide N, Undisturbed subgrade;fills compacted to a clear delineation of private 95%proctor density property from public open space. A small asphalt parking area with five parking spaces will be placed at the terminus of Tumbling Waters Court and will provide another opportunity for trail users to access the trail. The remaining landscaping in this area will consist of native trees dispersed along the trail. 4 LEGENDS PARK AT BRIDGER CREE 0 • SEATING AREA AT BOYLAN ROAD AND NORTHVIEW STREET . At the intersection of Boylan Road and Northview Street,four seating areas will encompass the open space. The seating areas will include colored, textured concrete, two benches, colorful shrub plantings and ornamental tree plantings. Beyond the seating area,south of Boylan Road, will be small open spaces that will serve as extensions of the adjacent lots. Shade trees will delineate the border between the open space and the private lots. FRONT YARD COMMON OPEN SPACE Open spaces 3 through 7 and 9 through 10 provide front yard open space for residents. These spaces comprise of 5 foot wide concrete sidewalks that are located 5 feet from the property lines. Various trees are planted in the boulevard between the sidewalk and property lines. Placement of those trees is desirable at the intersection of two lots to allow for maximum flexibility in housing ► � -/ design. In.between between the sidewalks is minimum sloped a � p play lawn that will be irrigated and mowed. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS The irrigation system will be professionally designed and built to the City of Bozeman standards and specifications. All main lines and lateral lines will be schedule 40 PVC pipe, with the exception of any drip lines which will be a class 160 polyethylene pipe. Most of the area will be irrigated with high-quality gear-driven rotor heads or pop up spray heads. Connections will include a unitized swing joint for rotors and funny pipe for spray heads to the main line. Trees located in native grass (non-irrigated) areas will receive supplemental drip irrigation for establishment purposes. Approximately four different wells will be drilled to provide irrigation for the park and open space areas. Each of the wells will produce the maximum allowable rate of 35 gallons per minute, unless additional groundwater rights are procured. Wells will contain a submersible pump that provides the necessary pressure and filtration to efficiently run the system. The systems will be controlled with Maxicom-compatible automatic controllers that are programmed to run the pump relay and individual zones. HERBACEOUS VEGETATION SOCCER FIELD Due to the intense use of the soccer fields as an active recreation area, a special seed mix will be used for the field itself. Athletic fields will be planted with new-improved Kentucky bluegrass types and new cultivars of perennial rye. It must be understood that these grasses require more fertilizer and overall maintenance. The trade-off is vigorous 5 lateral growth, excellent recuperative ability and drought and disease tolerance that are not found in the common varieties of grasses. Examples of some of the new, aggressive types of Kentucky Bluegrasses are as follows: Award, Total Eclipse, Midnight, Nustar, • Ram I, Limousine and Touchdown. IRRIGATED LAWNS Any areas that are disturbed by construction activities will have a prepared seed bed and reseeded with the appropriate grass species. It is recommended that all seeding is completed with a narrow spacing drill seeder, then rolled and compacted for optimum establishment. In areas with slopes at or over 3:1, broadcast seeding will be appropriate, but must be raked into the soil and then rolled and compacted. In areas that receive irrigation, the recommended seed mix is as follows: Grass Species Percentage of mix Kentucky Bluegrass 60 % Perennial Ryegrass 25 % Creeping Red Fescue 15 % Drill Seed at 5 lbs. per 1000 square feet; double the rate for broadcast seeding NON-IRRIGATED LAWNS Areas that are not in wetland or low lying areas and do not receive any irrigation will be reclaimed and seeded with the following mix which contains many of the native spe- cies found in the region: Grass Species Percentage of Mix Western Wheatgrass 40 % Slender Wheatgrass 20 % Thickspike Wheatgrass 10 % Bluebunch Wheatgrass 10 % Sheep Fescue 10 % Sherman Big Bluegrass 10 % Drill seed at 10 lbs. per acre, double the rate for broadcast seeding WOODY VEGETATION The vegetation in all of the park lands will be quality nursery stock. Boulevard trees will be planted in all right of way areas as required by the City of Bozeman. Boulevard trees will be limited to deciduous shade trees. Exact tree species will be detailed as part of the construction documents and approved by the City Forester. Boulevard trees will contain several different species to avoid a monoculture. Below is a list of species to be considered: Botanical Name Common Name Characteristics Fraxinus ni ra Black Ash Significant fall color Tilia cordata Littleleaf Linden Canopy tree Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Seedless Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' Skyline Hone locust Filtered shade Tilia americana'Redmond' Redmond Linden Pyramidal shape Acer platanoides 'Emerald Queen Emerald Queen Maple Significant fall color Ulmus americana 'Morton' Morton American Elm Dutch Elm Disease resistant In addition to the tree species listed above, several other deciduous shade trees may be considered for use in the park and open space areas. Each species will be selected for its water requirements, growth form and maintenance requirements. Botanical Name Common Name Characteristics� Sorbus aucu aria European Mountainash Native orange fruits Quercus macrocar a Bur Oak Stately tree, slow growing Acer rubrum'Northwood' Northwood Maple Significant fall color Aesculus glabra Ohio Buckeye Large fruits Po ulus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Significant fall color, bark Smaller, ornamental trees add interest to the landscape by having significant flowering capabilities, ornamental fruit or interesting bark Ornamental trees are placed at trail crossings or other areas of public use. Trees with fruits will be located away from sidewalks and trails. Botanical Name Common Name Charactenstcs , S rin a reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac White flowers Prunus maackii Amur Chokecherry Copper bark Prunus vir iniana 'Shubert' Canada Red Chokecherry Purple leaves Cratae us x mordenensis Toba Hawthorn Thornless, flowers P rus ussuriensis Ussurian Pear Fruiting, flowers Acer ginnala Amur Maple Significant fall color Coniferous (evergreen) trees add winter interest to the landscape in addition to providing valuable screening and wind buffering capabilities. Evergreen trees are placed on large land areas and will be planted to accommodate the future mature growth that does not block walkways. 7 9 0 Botanical Name Common Name Characteristics Juni erus sco ulorum Rocky Mountain Juniper Used for screening Picea en elmannii En elmann Spruce Native pyramidal tree Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce Blue-green needles Picea un ens 'Glauca' Colorado Blue Spruce Blue needles Pinus nigra Austrian Pine Dense form Pinus s lvestris Scotch Pine Copper bark Pseudotsuga menziesii 'Glauca' Rocky Mountain Douglas fir Moist areas Along the back property lines that parallel Bridger Creek,a hedgerow of bare-root shrubs will be planted to delineate the private/public property boundary. This hedgerow will consist of at least three shrub species that are native or have adapted to Montana. The species will contain Caragana, Cotoneaster and Lilac. Remaining shrubs will be planted in formal shrub beds that have an amended planting mix. Shrub beds will have weed barrier fabric and mulch. Plant beds will be irrigated by a drip system. Final plant species selection of both the shrub and tree species will have final approval by the City Forester prior to construction. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBLE PARTY The Developer will maintain the parks and open space areas until a Home Owner's Association is formed, who will then assume control of park maintenance until a City- wide Park Maintenance District is created. MOWING AND WATERING Depending on seasonal moisture, native grasses should be mowed 3 times per year; the first time at the end of May, the second time in mid-July, and the final time occurring in mid-October. The mow height should be a minimum of 4 inches, with 6 inches being preferable. Turf grass areas should have a mow height of no less than 3 inches and be allowed to grow to 4 or 4 - 1/2 inches before being mowed again. Bluegrass lawn areas require roughly 12 inches of water between June 1st and September 1st. At peak demand this means roughly 1 inch of precipitation per week in lawn areas. For mature lawn areas, this water should be spread evenly through the week and in less frequent, deeper soak- ings FERTILIZATION 8 LEGENDS PARK AT_BRIDGF�ZCR Fertilizing of grass and lawn areas should be done as necessary in should not be overdone to minimize water needs and mowing and to protect sensitive areas. Lawns which have irrigation at head to head coverage should have two applications of fertilizer: The first should be a blend of 17-17-17 in May and then should have an application of 27-8-8 in mid summer. As the lawns are establishing the rate of fertilization should be 401bs per 10,000 square feet. An established lawn should be fertilized at a rate of 60 lbs. per 10,000 square feet. Bi-annual soil test should be taken to assess soil nutrient contents and adjust fertilizer rates accordingly. In areas outside the corridor, the shade trees should be fertilized in April with 16-10-9 plus iron and zinc. Once trees and shrubs are established, they should be fertilized with tree food spikes. Do not fertilize trees and shrubs past mid-July. Pruning of evergreens should occur in June. Shade trees should be pruned in April, except maples and birch. Maple and Birch species should be pruned in mid to late July. All pruning shall be done under the direct supervision of the City Forester. General monitoring for pests and diseases should be done throughout the year. Trees and shrubs should be deep watered right before the ground freezes. NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL A noxious weed control program has been established with a local contractor. A yearly property check with spot spraying as required should occur in the month of June. This should be coordinated with the County Weed Supervisor and the NRCS agent. This program can also be used to control the weeds in gravel trails and walkways with spot application of a weed control agent as required. SNOW REMOVAL Concrete sidewalks located in the public right-of-way will have the snow removed within 24 hours of the end of any snowfall event as per Bozeman Ordinance 1529. The responsible party will be the subdivision's home owner's association. Gravel trails will not have a regular snow removal schedule. PLAYGROUND INSPECTIONS All playground equipment shall be inspected annually by a National Certified Playground Safety Inspector. The homeowner's maintenance association is responsible for hiring the independent contractor to provide the inspection. The inspection report is then submitted to the City of Bozeman Parks and Recreation Department. ANIMAL CONTROL Domestic pets in parks must be kept on a leash and owners must immediately collect pet refuse. Rodents may be controlled if levels of predation threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. Poisons to control rodents can not be used on City of Bozeman owned or dedicated land. 9 • • IRRIGATION SYSTEM The irrigation system should be charged in April, after the frost has left the ground and plant material begins to grow. All of the manual drain valves should be turned to the closed position. The power for the well pump should be switched to the "on" position. Program or adjust the controller for the current month's watering needs. Check all heads to ensure that there is no breakage and that proper coverage is attained. Each month the heads and controller should be checked and adjusted for the weather. The irrigation system will need to be monitored to watch for breaks, vandalism and overall needs of the site. When the sprinkler heads are repaired, repairs should be made with the same brand and nozzles. This ensures that the coverage is efficient for the working pressure and disperses at an equal precipitation rate. The heads should be checked to ensure that they are seated at a level which it is not damaged from mowing or maintenance equipment. A periodic check of the drip emitters around the trees is necessary to ensure they are functioning properly. Winterization of the irrigation system typically occurs during the last week of October. At this time, the power to the well pump should be turned off. All manual drain valves should be opened. Use a high-powered air pump to connect to many of the quick coupler valves around the system. Run air through the system, opening and closing each valve zone, until all of the water is completely out of the system. Turn off the controller and leave the water off until spring. If winter time watering is necessary, this should be done manually from a tank to avoid damage to the system. 10 LEGEaNDS PARK AT IDGFa� CR z z j �C:) a 1 rI�/11 Q LL C i W z~O ce N CO ' A N^q C/� w}Qhz Z Qz�g Z3�,0a jo0 �Uo a [� QZ43 t w0"N3 m�3 uo 0 N as m ' w Y ICY U w f = U Z w o U Z � w if ° es r ®� • .�� ,.,.. r ,m.. � mo�w// uJ �So §f S§ mamma�S .m.., .... _ ram, �" s < sif of a O PI d f .am.. .m.. .... .ae. ,®,, a-x a- 3. "' ►---1 xz' ,m .n.. ., is is is is 6s J z ww (jN ZONING INFORMATION w _ ZONING FOR ALL LOTS FOR LEGENDS II _ AT BRIDGER CREEK IS R1 . 4 • ~ W W W roconni SITE PLAN I 00 1 S & ZONING , Z � 1 SCALE: 1"=200' Ask AlElk LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II - Project Phasing I 1 , t Ll-rTUMBLING WATERS CT. MAIDEN SPIRIT ST. EDI EL IN. \ / -_ DGEFIELD CT. —J L _ / _ BOYLAN ROAD i MIDFIELD ST. I 31— IE I I I I WC LEGENDS @a—mu at BRIDGER CREEK II wam�mat—Ua �ceo®ate ramp CLIENT:EDGEFlELD Project Phasing FIELD WORK•MMI DATE:12/20/05 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/02/2006 DRAWN BY: 1 MEE SCALE: '=200' DRAWING NAME: G IntoJECT/sa5a/002/AuDMEauTARMECTRI swGDwc CHECKED BY=MEE PROD .LEGENDSII SHEET PAGE OF T_PAGE 3 ES §9 §I §q §9 §6 §! is .®.n f 4 k 200 0 100 200 ( IN FEET ) MORRISON �/ors 901 Technology Blvd. DRAWN BY: JAU PROJECT NO. © Bozeman MT59718 LEGENDS 2 AT BRIDGER CREEK 3959.005 7�T T7—�� Surveyors CHKD.BY: Y!7 MATH F, ' Sclendsts Phone:(406)587-0721 APPR.BY: ylp BOZEMAN MONTANA 1E JE INC.IN Planners Fax:(406)587-1176 FIGURE NUMBER M Employcc-O—d Co Parry DATE: 01/31106 CWwtIAMOMOmaSaNJM1ESM1E UC,N°° UTILITY PLAN FIG. 1 C:\Documents and Set6ngsWolenerlMy Documentstegends 11 PadACAD1UTILMSTR.dwg Plotted by jolener on Feb/2/2006 'CIE LEGENDS AT. BRIDGER CREEK II ` �i SUBDIVISION GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN. • VERTICAL DATUM=COB. FINISHED CONTOURS ARE FINISHED GRADE. FINISHED FLOOR=FINISHED GRADE+0.75 FEET.. Pond n pond 9, 0 c ten n 1 a i o I §e §e §e of of g� "� '§� § ` ~\ Pond A -- -- -- - - - - - f - ass i Detentio _ a 13,800 c - - - - - - - - - r ; --- -- - �., , - - ------------ ° v ' a c Legend J 0 Concrete Valley Gutter Inlets & Storm Pipe Finished Contours N O • �� Existing Contours r ,� 9 ,� a S. FEET)) SKW WJWW Flow Direction °°"'"°"° "' DRUM,ST-JW= ST-1 f 0 • ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Peter MacGregor Rugheimer Mary Rugheimer Wictor f/k/a Mary Kelly Oakwood Properties,LLC Vera M. DeHaan,Trustee rAO6eimer 607 Professional Drive,Ste 3 6800 Dry Creek Road 1 owell Rugheimer Bozeman,MT 59718 Belgrade,MT 59714 1404 Story Mill Road Bozeman,MT 59715 Mildred V.McAfee and Kenneth E. Rodney D. Campbell Waite H.Willmuth McAfee,Trustees Kathryn J.Campbell Linda K. Willmuth 1321 Bridger Drive 2205 Bridger Drive 2155 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 John H. Anthony Krista Campbell Kathy A. Anthony Kent Nielsen Leslie Ann Jones 2115 Bridger Drive 2107 Bridger Drive 2103 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Lowell R. Klatt Guenter G. Schmalz Robert L. Brendgard Phyllis S. Klatt Mary Margaret Schmalz Anthony Brendgard 2021 Bridger Drive 1728 Delaford Court 2011 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Carrollton,TX 75007 Bozeman,MT 59715 Lee F. Hain Edward M. Makoff Elaine W. Hain Donna L.Makoff Sidney I. ger Drive Wan, ridger Drive 1925 Bridger Drive Bole Bridger Drive MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Ruth W.Miller John W.MacDonald John Yoder Benjamin W. Dean Rebecca R.MacDonald Jill M. Yoder Janet D. Broadbrooks 1907 Bridger Drive 1901 Bridger Drive 1915 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Lloyd B.Parker Wanda Lee Taplin Robert P.Ballard Eileen Parker PO Box 3714 Cynthia L. Ballard 1821 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59772 1803 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Ian Elliot,Trustee Barbara A.Muller J. Russell Williams,Jr. 1725 Bridger Drive Michael M.Muller Patricia L. Williams Bozeman,MT 59715 1717 Bridger Drive 1705 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Lois J. Zweifel Nathan Peckinpaugh Amy M. Thomas 1703 Bridger Drive Marci Yamasaki Kate McInnerney Bozeman,MT 59715 1616 Bridger Drive 1615 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 • Page 1 of 2 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS William R. Dobie Trust of Ben J. Cysewski Audie Bert Collins n Dobie a/k/a Karen Lee Dobie Marilyn Rita Collins 3 Bridger Drive 1521 Bridger Drive 1509 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Ethel I.Thies,Trustee Sherman Veltkamp Rufus L.Cone 1505 Bridger Drive Eva Veltkamp Margaret N. Cone Bozeman, MT 59715 14600 Kelly Canyon Road 1413 Bridger Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Mario T. Del Duca Mildred V.McAfee&Kenneth E.McAfee, Hipshot Development,LLC Leilani M. Del Duca Trustees 1405 Bridger Drive 1321 Bridger Drive 410 North Church Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 James D. Rutherford Aspen Partners I,LLC Scott T. Hedglin Cindy L. Rutherford PO Box 1599 Karen L.Hedglin 108 Carroll Trail Missoula,MT 59806 2261 Buck's Run Court Lewistown,MT 59457 Bozeman,MT 59715 Adam I.Edelman Gary Quinn Victoria M.Edelman Mary Quinn 2256 Buck's Run Court 1300 24'h Avenue SW 41-man,I`TT 59715 Great Falls,MT 59404 • Page 2 of 2 t r � 1 A C o ON J I ACCEP ACCEPTED REBAR FOR LINE S S-3-051 BRIDGER 3_3_05 2-- CREEK S-2-O51 � r S-2-05 2 W-3-05 ' Y W-2-05 / THREAD OF STRE•A, E R/ ED Y / SURVEY CONDUCTED ON 0.4/0 200 INVESTIGATION AREA LIN LEGEND: ® WETLAND MORRISON LEGENDS AT MAIERLE,INC. BRIDGER CREEK II Go GRAPHIC SC oG „:,„;.;,„gym , ra,,a�-„w WETLAND DELINEATION WETLAND CONTINUES OFF OF PROPERTY IN FEET> CLIENT: FIELD WORK:SR/EN ppTE:6/30/0 PLOTTED DATE: Jan/31/2006 - 09:19:32 am DRAWING NAME: *-� DRAWN BY: SE SCALE:1"=100' CADmum—and Selling,\J,le ,\My Gxumems\Legends n ,A\CAD\WEr—FlG.d.g CHECKED BY.PW PROJ b:3959.003.301.03 SHEET —OF aonco erred„,,, 01-26-06 03:53pm From- - • T-262 P.002/009 F-633 J DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTRICT REGULATOY IC 10 WEST 1 sTM STREETRSUITS 2200 R E C 1•r r .. slat eNA MT 68826l ;REPLY ; .a AArrrE T NTIONOF October 21, 2005 Q Helena Regulatory Office Phone (406) 441-1375 Fax (406)441-1380 RE; Corps pile No. 2005-90-761 Corps File No. 2005-90-820 Edgefield LLC Morrison Maierle, Inc. Attn: Paul W. McGuire P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771 Dear Mr. McGuire: We have reviewed the information you submitted on behalf of your client to construct a subdivision on property located in Section 32, Township 1 South,Range 6 East, Gallatin County, Montana. .� Under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Department of the Army • permits are required for the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States. Waters of the U. S. include the area below the ordinary high water marls of stream channels and lakes or ponds connected to the tributary system, and wetlands adjacent to these waters. Isolated waters_ and wetlands, as well as man-made channels and ditches, may be waters of the U. S. in certain circumstances,which must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Based on the information you initially provided, and a subsequent site visit by the Corps on October 13;2005, the site contains both jurisdictional waters of the U. S. under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and a non jurisdictional wetland. The enclosed __ Jurisdictional Determination (ID)forms describe the extent of waters of the United States on the -- project site.—These-are-Approved-Jurisdictional-Determinations,-andihey_are_vaiid_for a-period of 5 years from the date of this letter unless new information warrants revision of the determination before the expiration date. If you disagree with these jurisdictional determinations, you have the right to appeal the decision. If you would like more information on the jurisdictional appeal process,contact this office. Corp File No,2005-90-761, Isolated wetland(Wetland W-2-05) is not jurisdictional. Corp File No.2005-90-820, Bridger Creek and its adjacent wetlands ('Wetland W-3-05) are jurisdictional. Priniatlan Recyc:a4Paper • 01-26-06 03:53pm From- • T-262 P.003/000 F-633 2 •� Please be advised that if any fill material is to be placed either temporarily or permanently in a water of the:United States, a Department of the. Axmy permit is required for this project. You may also be required to obtain other applicabi-federal, state, tribal and local permits. If you have any questions,please call Vield Sullivan of thus office at(406) 441-1375. Any and all future submittals and inquiries must reference Corps File No's. 2005-90-761 and 2005-90-820. Sincerely, ?,anSteinle Montana Program Manager Enclosures JD Forms Lr 01-26-06 03:54pm Frrm- • - . T-262 P-004/009 F-633 DISTRICT OFMCE: Omaha rILE NUMBER:2005-90-761 PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION., • Slate: Montana County: Gallatin Center coordinates of site(latitudeilangitude): 45.42-21,3707 lat,111-0.53,1645 long Approximate size of area(parcel)reviewed, including uplands:unk acres, Name of n:_arest waterway:Bridget Crcck Name of watershed: Gallatin JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION -Completed: Desktop determination [] Dare: Site visits) ® Da[e(s): 10-13-05 Jurisdietiunal Determination(JD): [J Preliminary JD-Based on available information,❑there appear to be(or)Cl there gopear to be no"waters of the United States"and/or"navigable waters of the United States"on the project site. A preliminary JD is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part 331). Appr•o•.cd JD—All approved JO is an appealable action(Reference 33 CFR pan 331). Check all that apply: 3 There are"navigable waters of the United Stases"(as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: Q There are"waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of,jurisdictional area: �j There are "isolated,non-navigable, intra-stale warere or wetlands"within the reviewed area. Decision supported by SWANCC/Migratory laird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No Jurisdiction. BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETEJiMINATION: A. . Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as"navigable waters of the United Statos". • 1] The presence of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used,oi,have been used in the pass,or may be susceptible for use to iransnort interstate or foreign commerce. B. Writers defined under 33 CFR part 328.3(a)as"waters of the United States". (1)The presence of waters,which are currently used,or were used in the past,or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. jl (2)The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlandsi. [ (3)The presence of other waters such as immi tate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats, sandilats,wetlands,sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds,the use,degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters(check all that apply): ❑ (i)which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. © (iri)from which fish or sltellflsh are or could betaken and sold in intersiate ar'foreign commerce. [] (iii)which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. . (4)Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US. ®-(5j'flte presence of a triliufry to R Watrr identified in(1)=(4)-above. (6)The presence of territorial seas. (7)The presence of wetlands adjacent'to other waters of the US,except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. Rationalo for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination(applies to any boxes chackild above), Ifthejurisdictional water or wetland is not itself a navigable water of the United States,describe connections)to the downstream navigable waters. If B(1)or B(3)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document navigability and/or tntsrstate conrrnercd connection (i,e;, discuss site conditions, Inetirdtng why the waterbody is navigable andlor how the destrnction of the warerbody co:rid affect interstate or foreign commerce).If B(2, 4, S or 6)is rued as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document the rationale used to make the deierminatlon.JfB(7)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document the rationale used to make adjacency determination:Wedand W2.05 isolated 01-26-06 03:54pm From- • 7-262 P.005/009 F-633• 2 Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction:(Reference:33 CFR parts 328 and 329) [� Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: Hl h Tide Line Indicated by: ❑ cicar,natural line impressed on the bank. [] oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ the presence of litter and debris (] Fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) • changes in the character of soil © physical in ark ings(characteristics ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ tidal gages Qshelving ❑ other: other: Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ©survey to available datum; []physical markings;❑vegetation lincs/changcs in vegetation types. [], Wetland boundaries,as shown on the anached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation reporl prepared by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction: The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands. 71 Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CPR part 328(a)(1,2,or 4-7). EJ Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR part 328.3(a)(3). [� The Corps has made a case-specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the United States: ❑ Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons,pursuant to 33 CFR pan 329.3, ❑ Artificially irrigated areas,which would revert to upland!,'the irrigation ceased. ❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation,settling basins,or rice growing. © Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small omamental bodies of water created by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons. ❑ Water-relied depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining Fill,sand,or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation op.-ration is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 328.3(a). Isolated,intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce. ❑ Prior converted cropland,as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,Explain rationale: ❑ Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: • ❑ Other(explain): DATA RE,VIEWED FOR. 1JIRSIDICTIONAL DETrRMIINATION(maikall that apply): Maps, plans,plats or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. ® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the npplieant. This office concurs with the delinca:ion reporl,Haled 9-26-Q5,prepared by(company):Morrison Maierle Inc This office does not concur with the delineation report,dated ,prepared by(company): Data sheets prepared by the Corps. ❑ Corps'navigable waters'studies: U.S.Geological Survey Hydrologie:Atlas: ® L:.S,Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles: 1`.S,Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic quadrangles: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: Q National wetlands inventory maps: State/Local wetland inventory maps: FEMA/FIRM maps(Map Name&Date): 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (NGVD) [J Aerial Photographs(Name&Date): ❑ Other photographs(Date): Advanced Identification Wetland maps: i s Site visir/determination conducted on;10-13-05 ❑ Applicabletsupporting case law: [] Otlier information(please specify): Wetlands are identified and delineated using flit methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual(87 Manual)(i.e., occurrence of hydrophytio vegetation,hydrie soils and wetland hydrology). aTlha tern"adjacent"means bordering,contiguous,or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S,by man-made dikes or barriers,natural river berths,beach dunes,and the like are also adjacent 01-26-06 03:55pm From- T-262 P.006/009 F-633 .. - • U,a.Army t:otp5 Ot lrl1gu�Ccia DISTRICT OFFICE: Omaha FILE NUMBER:2005-90.820 PROJECT(LOCATION INFORMATION; State: Montana County: Gallatin Center coordinates of site(latitude/longitude): 4542-25,6318 lat, 111-0-50,8024 long Approximate size of area(parcel)reviewed,including uplands:unk acres. Name of nearest waterway:Bridaer Creek Name of watershed: Gallatin JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Completed: Des),-op determination Q Date: Site visit(s) ® Date(s): 10.13-05 Jurisdictional Determination(JD): Q Preliminary ID-Based on available information,❑there appear to be(or)❑there appear to be no"waters of the United States'and/or"navigable waters of the United States"on the project site. A preliminary ID is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part 331), ® Approved JD An approved JD is an appealable action(Reference 33 CFR pan 131). Check all that apply: '[]There are-navigable waters of the United states"(as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdiction!area: ®There are"waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 326 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate Site of jurisdictional area: [] There are "isolated,non-navigable, intra-state waters or wetlands"within the reviewed area. ❑ Decision supported by SWANCC/Migmtory Bird Rule Information Sh:et for Determination of No Jurisdiction. �`. BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL..DETERMINATION: • A. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as"navigable waters of the United States": [j. The pre>ance of waters that are subject to the ebb acid flow of the tide and/or are presently used,or have'been used in the past,or may be susceptible for use to transom interstate or foreign commerce. B. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 328.3(s)as"waters of the United States": - •-. ( (1)The presence of waters,which are currently used,or were used In the past,or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce,including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, (2)TI:c presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands. [j (3)Th.:presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats, sandflr:ts,wetlands,sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds,the use,degradation or dearruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters(check all that apply): ❑ 0)which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes, ❑ (it)from which fish or shellfish ate or could betaken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ (iii)which art:or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce, El—(4)-1mNoundments-of waters-otherwisc-derined as waters-of the.US._ ® (5)The presence of a tributary to a water identified in(I)-(4)above. Q (6)The presence of territorial seas. (7)The presence of wetlands adjacent2 to other waters of the US,except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. Rationale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination (applies to any boxes checked above). If the)urt'sdiorlonal water or wetland is not ftse jf a navigable water of the United Stater, describe connection(s)to the downstream navigable waters. 1;'B(1)or B(3) is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document navigability and/or interstate commerce connection (i,e., dis:r+ss sfte conditions,Including why the wolerbody is navigable and/or how the destruction of the waterboay could affect fnierstate orforeign commerce),if B(2,4, S or 6)is used as the Basis ofJurisdietion, dome»tent the rationale used to make the dererminarion. IfB(7)Is used as the Basis ofJurisdtction,document the rationale used to make at{lacenry determination.- Welland W-3-05 and Bridger Creek to Gallatin River to Missouri River(Sccil0) • 01-26-06 03:55pm From- • • T-262 P-007/009 F-633 Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction: (Reference:33 CrR parts 328 and 329) Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: [) High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ cleat-,natural line impressed on the bark ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ the presence of litter and debris ❑ frne shell or debris deposits(foreshorc) • .1� ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ tidal gages ❑❑ sholving ❑ other: other; Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑survey to available datum; ❑physical markings;❑vegetation lines/changes In vegetation types. ❑, Wetland boundaries,its shown on the attached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation report prepared by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction: The reviewed arcs consists entirely of uplands. C Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1,2,or 4.7). Q Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR pan 328.3(a)(3). J] 1'he Corps has made a case-specific determination that the following waters present oil the site are not Waters of the United States: ❑ Waste treatment systems,including treatment ponds or lagoons,pursuant to 33 CFR part 328.3. © Artificially irrigated areas,which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased. ❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which arc used cxclusivaly for such purposes as stock watering,irrigation,settling basins,or rice growing. ❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornaniental bodies of water created by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons. ❑ Watcr-filled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill,sand,or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 328,3(a). ❑ Isolated,intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce. �; ❑ Prior converted cropland,as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service.Explain rationale: ❑ Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: • ❑ Other(explain): DATA RCVIEW'ED,f OR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(mark all that apply): ® Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. ® Data shccts prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant, ® This office concurs with the delineation report,dated 9-26-05.prepared by(company):Morrison Maier'le Inc ❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report,dated prepared by(company): ❑ Data shccts prepared by the Corps. ❑ Corps'navigable waters'studies: U.S.Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ® U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: [] U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles: r] U.S.Geologicui Survey 15 Minute Tlis[oric quadrangles: ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: National wetlands inventory maps: State/Local wetland inventory maps- El FEMAiFIRM maps(Map Name&Date): (] 100-year Floadplain Elevation is: (NOVD) Aerial Photographs(Name&Date): Other photographs(Pate): Advanced Wendfic4on Wetland maps: (� Site visiude[ermination conducted on: 10-13.05 Applicable/supporting case law: [� Other information(please specify): Wetlands are identified and delincntcd using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Dclinoation Manual(87 Manual)(i.e., occurrence orhydrophydc vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology), "I'hc term"adjacent"means bordering,contiguous,or neighboring. Wetlands sepamtod from other waters of the U,S.by man-made dikes or barriers,natural rlver bcmis,beach duncb,and die like are also adjacent. 01-26-06 03:56pm Frjm- �' _ _ `. r T-262 P.008/009 F-633 DISTRICT OFFICE: Omaha ✓ FILTH NUMBER:2005-90-820 PROJECT LOCATION INFORYIATION: State: Montana County: Gallatin Center coordinates of site(latitude/longitude): 45-42.25.6318 lat,111.0-50.8024 long Approxim_itc size of area(parcel)reviewed,including uplands:unk acres. Name of nearest waterway:Bridger Creek Name of watershed: Gallatin JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION -Completed: Desktop determination Q Date: Site visits) Of Datc(s): 10-13-05 Jurisdictional Determination(JD): Q Preliminary Jr)-Based on available information,❑ there appear to be(or)❑there appear to be no"waters of the United States"and/or"navigable water$of the United States"on the project site. A preliminary JD is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part 331). Appro%-d JD—An approved JD Is un appealable action(Reference 33 CPR pan 331). Chcck all that apply: Q There are"navigable waters of the United States"(as defined by 33 CFR pan 329 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area- 0 There are"waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance)within the reviewed arch. Approximate size ofjurisdictional area: Cj There are 'isolated, non-navigable, inrra-stale waters or wetlands"within the reviewed arca. [] Decision sttppu,T.cd by SWANCC/Migratory Bird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No Jurisdiction. BASIS OF JURISWCTIONAL DETERMINA 1'ION: A. Waters deltned under 33 CFR part 329 as"navigable waters of the United States": • ❑ The preseucc of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used,or have bccn used in the past,or way be susceptible for use tatranspnrt interstate or foreign commerce. B. Waters defined under 33 CFR pnrt 328.3(a)ns"waters of the Unitud States",, [] (1)The presence of waters,which Arc currcnyJi used,or were used in the past,or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign cornmercc,including all waters which are subj ect to the ebb and flow of the tide. [� (2)The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands. ❑ (3)The presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,Streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats, sattdflats,wetlands,sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds,the use,degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters(checic all that apply): (i)which are or coue'd be used by interstate or foreign travelers For recreational or otter purposes. ••(ii)frum whieit f tsh o.'thellfsh arc or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ (iii)which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. (4)Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US. (5)The presence of a trNU ary to a w-a e:ridentified in(1)=(4)above. - [e (6)The presence of territorial seas. �j (7)The presence of wetlands adjacent-to other waters of the US,except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. Rsteionale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination(applies to any boxes checked abovo). If the jurisdictional water or warlord is not itsr(fa navigable water of the United States, describe aonneetion(s)to the downstream navigable waters, (f 13(1)or B(3)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document nr+vlgabiltry and/or interstate commerce connection (i.e.,discuss•site conditions,including why the waterbody is navigable and/or how the destruction of the waterbody could affect interstate or foreign eommerce;.fB(2,4. S or 6)is used as the Basis ofJurlsdiction,document the rationale used to make the determination.IfB(7)is used a the Basis o(Jurisdiction,document ilia rationale used to make acyacency determination: Wetland W-3-05 and Bridgcr Creck to Gallatin River to Missouri River(Secil 0) 01-26-06 '3:56pm From- 0 0 T-262 P.000/009 F-633 LateralExtent of Jurisdiction;(Reference:33 CFR parts 328�nd 329) [] Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: Hi h Tide Line indicated by; ❑ clear,natural line impressed on the bank oil or scum lint along shore objects El he presence of liter and debris ❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) • '� ❑ changes in the character of soil [j physical markings/charncterislics ❑ destruction orterrestrial vegetation ❑ tiial gages ❑ shelving ❑ otb::r: ❑ other: Mean High Water Marl;indicated by: ❑ survey w available datum; ❑physicaI markings;❑vegetation lincsl:hanges in vcgelatior•types. Q •'Ketland boundaries,as shown on the attached wetland delineation map andiur in adelirteatioi report prepared by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction. The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands, ❑ Unable to confirm ilia presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1,2,or 4-?). ❑ Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction oil the basis of 33 CFR pill, 328.3(a,(3). The Corps has made a case-specific determination that the following waters preset..on the site urc not Waters of the United States: ❑ Waste treatment systems,including trearment ponds or lagoons,pursue it to 43 CFR part 328.3. ❑ Artificially irrigated areas,which would revert to upland if the irrigation teas,-d. ❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dq land w collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation,settling basins,or rice growing. ❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of%,titer,treated by excavating end/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic rear:ins. ❑ Water-tilled depressions created in dry land inci[ental to construction activity ar,:'pit3 excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill,sand,or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the Unitcd States found at 33 CFR 328.3(a). ❑ Isolated, intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce. ❑ Prior converted cropland,as determined by the Natural Resources Conicr vution Service.E'plain rationale; ❑ Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: ❑ Other(explain): DATA REVIEWED FOR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(marls all that apply): ; Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on 9ehalf of the applicant. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. ® This office concurs with tine delineation report,dated 9-26-05,prepared by(company):Morrib, ,u I,Iaierlc Inc ❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report,dated prepared Cy(:ompany): Data sh.mts prepared by the Corps. Corps' :avigable waters'studies: LI.S,Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ® U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: [ U.S. Ceuloi;ical Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles: Gs. eological-Sarvcy 15'Mintite 1`Gstorit-quadraiigles:- Q USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: [] NntionO wetlands inventory maps: State/Local wetland inventory maps: ❑ F.SMAVF,Rtvl reaps(Map Name&Date): El 100-yeix Floodplain Elevation is: (NOVD) �] Aerial N .3togra1j:rs(Name&Date): ❑ Otiler phorograph5(Dute): Advanced identification Wetland maps: ® Site visit/determination conducted on: 10.13.05 Q Appiici.ole/st pporting case law: �] Other information(please specify): 'Weiland s tut identified and delincar:d using the methods and criteria astablished in the Corps Wc flan d Delimanon Manuai(97 Mw teal)(i.e., occurrence of hydrophyti:.vegetation,hydrie soils and wetland hydrology). tThe term"adjacent"means bordering,contiguous,or neighboring. Wetlands separated from otter waters of the U.S.by man-made GIPS or • barriers,natural river tams,beach dunes,mid the like are also adjacent, • • • SOILS INFORMATION There are only 2 types of soils in the Legends II at Bridger Creek Subdivision. The predominate soil throughout most of the lots of the subdivision and the majority of the parks and open space is known as the Sudworth-Nesda Loam. Sudworth-Nesda Loam is designated on the soils maps at number 407A. It consists of slopes of 0 to 2 percent and is typically found near flood plains. This loam is very deep and is well-drained even though there is often an apparent water table. The second soil type is called the Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex. This soil is found along Bridger Creek and its banks. This loam is found in floodplains and consists of poorly drained strata. Due to the Creek, it often is subject to flooding and also has an apparent water table. The loam is very deep, with over 60 inches of topsoil. Use of these soils for recreation is based upon the tables provided in the Gallatin County Soil Survey. The soil survey rates each soils for specific recreational uses based upon three designations: slight, moderate and severe. " — - " Slight - Indicates that the 4" asoo � soils are favorable for use. , 3�oC • . * a d � i__ Limitations are minor and 4UC ro, += can easily be overcome. Good performance and low 31 Bridger maintenance can be 542A � ` , expected. Cr Moderate - Indicates that 4M limitations can be overcome by special planning, design eex or maintenance. i Severe - Indicates unfavorable conditions. These conditions would require major soil reclamation, special design or intensive maintenance. The Sudworth-Nesda Loam is ranked "slight" for picnic areas, paths and trails. It is ranked "moderate" for play areas due to the presence of small stones. The Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex is ranked for "moderate to severe" for both picnic areas, paths and trails, due to its wetness. It is ranked "severe" for playgrounds for wetness as well. There are no improvements master planned for the soils in this . category. • • • BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATE Project: Legends Park Phase: Legends II @ Bridger Creek -Master Plan Date: February 1, 2006 Prepared By: Peaks to Plains Design PC ITEM DESCRIPTION CITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY 6'Wide Gravel Trails City of Bozeman Std 4170 LF $ 2.50 $ 10,425 Developer Boulevard Shade Trees 1-1/2" -2" cal. 72 EA $ 190.00 $ 13,680 Developer Ornamental Boulevard Trees 1-1/2" -2" cal. 38 EA $ 175.00 $ 6,650 Developer Shade Trees 3-5' Height 90 EA $ 190.00 $ 17,100 By Others Ornamental Trees 1-1/2" -2" cal. 61 EA $ 175.00 $ 10,675 By Others Evergreen Trees 3'-5' Hei ht 43 EA $ 150.00 $ 6,450 By Others Shrubs Hedge, Bare-root 134 EA $ 10.00 $ 1,340 Developer Shrub Beds plants, mulch,fabric 4,439 SF $ 4.50 $ 19,976 By Others Concrete Sidewalk At Main Park 5265 SF $ 4.00 $ 21,060 Developer Thickened Edge Concrete For Playground 1288 SF $ 5.00 $ 6,440 Developer Colored/Textured Concrete 4"/4" Section 2712 SF $ 7.50 $ 20,340 By Others Earthwork Extra Earthwork 1 LS $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000 Developer Playground Equipment Tot Lot& School Age 1 LS $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000 By Others Community Center Public/Private 1 LS $400,000.00 $ 400,000 Developer Parking Lot Price Per Stall 28 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 42,000 Developer Benches 5' Length 14 EA $ 800.00 $ 11,200 By Others Bicycle Rack 10 racks 1 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200 By Others Interpretative Si na a Allowance 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000 By Others Dog Waste Bag Dispensers 6 EA $ 425.00 $ 2,550 By Others Well System and Development 35 GPM Wells 4 EA $ 15,000.00 $ 60,000 Developer Irrigation System- Rotors Sch 40 PVC 447,200 SF $ 0.45 $ 201,240 Developer Seeding Lawn Mix 447,200 SF $ 0.04 $ 17,888 Developer Seeding Soccer Field Mix 64350 SF $ 0.08 $ 5,148 Developer Native Mix(5' along creek Seeding side of trail) 20850 SF $ 0.04 $ 834 Developer Entry Sign Similar to Legends 1 1 LS $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000 Developer SUBTOTAL $ 1,026,196 MOBILIZATION & INSURANCE 10% $ 102,620 CONTINGENCY 15% $ 169,322 TOTAL $ 1,298,137 2/2/2006 Master Plan —/�Irr \\✓/�j LEGEND JI1 SHADE TREE \ r ORNAMENTAL TREE O EVERGREEN TREE LEGENDS PARK(ACTIVE RECREATION AREA) CMD HEDSE ROW t COLORED,TEXTURED CONCRETE JJR a DESIGNEDBV Z w n - 1 ''-. �• CLUBHOUSE(COMMUNITY CENTER) DRAWN BY 0 y SEAT AREA J z JR _ ��51GN CHECKED BY02/01/06 g \ DRIDGER CREEK TRAIL 6'WIDE GRAVEL TRAIL PLAYGROUND DATE 05034 WELL PROJECT NO. Ll GRAVEL TRAIL(BRID&ER CREEK TRAIL ONLY) 05034_PARKMP.DWG$ A. 5-STALL PARKING LOT TRAIL SPUR TO CREEK EDGE FILE NO. U HEDGE RON ,. IL _ L1 —ax \ � �L 1�\\\ \ J l I J ���✓ �� w S�aAo I> - / <) L/ _ •`� � z o` o o m a jv SPIRIS STREET \/ // _`� t%iFDI` LN" 1 � � � \ \ � �- �� � I` i •� n/ �1 LAYIN LANN i / 10 - I( �LANUI /yam/ �.,"� '• .� I 4 ..L'"' ._ 9._ap— yk z, N UJI SUBDIVISION SIGN 1 FRONT YARD COMMON FRONT YARD COMMON FRONT YARD COMMON \ FRONT YARD COMMON FRONT YARD COMMON FRONT YARD COMMON OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE z MASTER PLAN BRIDGER REEK ] TRAIL OVERALL MA H SCALE: 1"=100' z Z W U •� � �< w- "v'� `\ ��'7 �� L"' � LAJ-N �- / LAYVN i \\I r'- .-�J� `/ f\ ..L_ O 6Ut\ �rL SHEET 2 SEATING AREA \, �� LAB, 3 WELL COVERAGE ZONES* MP1 SCALE: 1"=30' 1� j •FINAL IRRIGATION DESIGNS WILL BE SCALE: 1"=300' SUBMITTED UPON MASTER PLAN /k ', i' APPROVAL STORM WATER RETENTION / \�\` _'^ / \go Al if — IFn73 .11/ ♦ / tTl cn 13 Al � j D \ ' m 91, z = SHEET TITLE PROJECT TITLE '- z y p Mp PRELIMINARY PARK LEGENDS PARK o,5MRX o D m Z 9 MASTER PLAN LEGENDS II AT BRIDGER CREEK PEAKS TO PLAINS DESIGNS D o NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BOZEMAN, MONTANA ° ROA" " SUITE 3 0 73C N 208 NORTH NTANA SUITE 350 BILLINGS.MONTANA 59101 � (406)294-9499-(406)256-7123 FAX www.PEAKSTOPwNS.COM C)2006 PEAKS TO PLAINS DESIGN,P.C. NOT LEGEND= PLANT SCHEDULE FOR I �a, ✓ \ \ SYMIGTiT BOTANICAL NAME I COMMON NAME ' \ \`. DEc1DUGus TREE, CONSTRUCTION /�'y\ \ �•``_ ''�-,---�� \ 1`\\ c\-\1�;I1 \ \ \. f/7�1 DECIDUOUS TREE AP 9 AGER PLATANOIDES EMERALD QUEEN' EMERALD QUEEN MAPLE FN' �- \\:C / ORNAMENTAL TREE FP. 13 FRAXINUS PENIJSYLVANIGA GREEN ASH ✓��^-..1 ) \ \`��'\ \ % � -- /�r�"� ,..r--�^' 6T II 6LEDITSIA TRIAGANTHOS 5KYGOLE' SKYLINE HONEYLOGIIST TA T TILIA AMERICANA REDMOND' REDMOND LINDEN JJR �i~ 1 \\. —� \``---_. ~^ �I-, ✓�\`' \✓�\, UA S ULMUS 1ORTON' , L a TG I T AGGOLADE ELM DESIGNEDBY z ijr---- -a•`\ \„ �� �•�•,:. \ ORNAMENTAL TREES p !/ / _ JJR � - _�� "•`\ \\• /��"' / ti%> �• \ MS 10 MALUS X 5PRIN6 SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE DRAWN BY O J j - r / \ 1?�(\ \• \\ I/ ', -� PM B PRUM15 MAAGKII Ah41R GHOKEGHERRY m VIR&INIANA SGH,BERT' I CANADA RED CHOKECHERRY JJR 3 / \\ \ •� ,\ \ t / \-- / \li 1`` `ter' SR. 1 .II 1 SYPJWA RETIGULATA'IVORY SILK' I IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC, CHECKED BY CL I.A TREE PLANTING PERMIT WILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF DATE ~ 'i• \ /�\ 9 y i I .\\`:\ I t / \\% / / ,/"-��\ r BOZEMAN. + 05034 Y \ 1 '• \ - „� //� \ ].DEVeN 15 SCHEMATIC,AND PRELIMINARY;ACTUAL TREE LOCATIONS / ¢W WILL BE FINALIZED WITH GONSTRLGTION DOCUMEN aT5. f PROJECT NO. � / •/� \ i / \ L..! \\ 5.FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WILL BE REVIEWED AND - `\ FILE NO. N / I ;' \ ;/, I (I '\ \\�\ ,�\,\`\ -�,\\ �' / _ ,\• i'''� APPROVED BY THE CITY OF BOZEMAN PARKS DEPARTMENT AND WILL_ FILE NO. U \\\ �\ .J/ / �../l,7 , `�`• \ COMPLY.WITH CITY OF COD ES DES AND REGULATIONS. \�id4 (•, \\ ,' \ /`/ '\ \h. L �`I ®� `� \^�,�\ 4. MAINTAIN A 10-FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN FIRE HYDRANTS, 1f=i J LINES.551ER LINES AND ANY BOULEVARD.TREES. h \ z v �\ 'R�•�e s �. .'�k. (U- 6 "s y ..� �d� � `..`. \ ;,tee- �/���• \\�``•... V � -Q (---�.��,~\ ,` .,. _, , � `.i r � � � �, !J^u-"y':1 �i S•��' co ;a c� �, ,i Y - •. ,` \ ', `/vim�-,��" � ,' \\ L_�..''�1�`• ``--'-\ \ jam• , j'�/J _� , / /, / `+�\�/f�" � <O<O T F, ~-I L, .�. � �, r \-- - 1 s`..�- a ` /% ;�� \` '�•_.<�/ 1/� e� /(11 FN✓ '�,'�� '/ '>, / C. / \•�' ; � /,--. �C(` \�t`� � / � �\ �'`--'`� l* //('�(--'--.���11 /� � �Q l � �% �'�...• .!�(1I Lc 1. \�•�-r I�/ems'� ��' ` 0 { L\�•..l l ! � � `..--� 43' �•[.� "/ l � C\�.L�%� i�\, l� Qr � 1D Ill r- - Yr Rys \ ��, � \� `\`, ' F�•f•� �F+1�1 FrT,�i \\V `4' �-_�_ l 1r \/' // /' -'T--._�1' _ -- - - _ n)SR���6 •�-' Ii \ " / \ � ,le .+,� H LJ FWY (2)5R II C7 a U J y cr (- \ / /`y (I)'-•(I � / ten. - -. J - ', � '' :' I / (2)Sg' — •' .\"�(�)-,,, w / � ` `\ F Q �� sii•/ ' L^" � '� ~'n) ? {s � ss-- �-PFt�- �- _ - ' / �C �-� � \;.! '{ / tV / % / -'� H1 // ten)\ - 1°.. l 4,� - - ess 1 1 i � /� ( G• / V � �,�/ / \ `� , '0)sr,� •\, b y _ -. � � `.- ��..,.� .j r / � 7v 1 j• /,•�� �. ' // 1 �' / r1' � '' (4)iTG r�1 .-,_ .. b5s �" a s.' v i.• ,. - �!� - / fA,^ � / / } i / (. )�- __'• - - -- —ems ass' s o ..s „ � _ - S�� ! \ , '`'�, `li � ,. �z (1)eT (1)AP (1)TA F i' (1)UA( - ,I !f (I)eT tu (1)AP x 1 ,n i ro FP ,•, i (1)UA - - - SHEET t n)6T 1 BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING PLAN 1 (1)FN SCALE:V=80' r MP3 • 18 • • Community Letters o September 13, 2005 Matt Micklewright NorthWestern Energy P.O. Box 490 Bozeman, MT 59771-0490 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Mr. Micklewright: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly ;east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and • input from relevant utility companies regarding provision of service to the development. Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. We will be contacting your office for locations of utility conduits or special easement requirements, etc. that will be needed on the preliminary plat. i Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions,please contact me at(406) 556-5868. Sincerely, Land West Consulting,LLC i -att Ekstrom, P. . Project Manager Enclosures cc: File CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 30 NWEnergy 12-6-04.doc i i September 13, 2005 Bresnan Communications Attn: Scott Riis 511 W. Mendenhall Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivison Dear Mr. Riis: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified j Development Ordinance (UDO); we are soliciting comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and • input from relevant utility companies regarding provision of service to the development. Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. We will be contacting your office for locations of utility conduits or special easement requirements, etc. that will be j needed on the preliminary plat. i Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at (406) 556-5868. ;Sincerely, Land West Consulting, LC MO Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures j cc: File i CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 30 Bresnan 12-6-04.doc • I t September 13, 2005 Bozeman School District Bob Gutzman, Assistant Superintendent i P.O. Box 520 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision i Dear Mr. Gutzman: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly i east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service j providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and input from relevant agencies regarding this development. i Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at (406) 556-5868. Sincerely, Land West C771Cg,LLC . l j att Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures cc: File CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 32 School 12-06-04.doc • !September 13, 2005 i (Bozeman Deaconess Hospital !John Nordwick, President& CEO 915 Highland Boulevard (Bozeman, MT 59715 jRe: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Mr.Nordwick: i 'The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel :Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service ;providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and input from relevant agencies regarding this development. • i Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. 'Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions,please contact me at(406) 556-5868. ;Sincerely, 'Land West Consul in ,LLC M ,.t Eks om, P.E. Pr`ject Manager Enclosures cc: File CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PRO]ECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 31 Hospital 12-6-04.doc I I I • September 13, 2005 iMed Trans Montana Brian Bates 2101 Industrial Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 I Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision I Dear Mr. Bates: ;The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly ,east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel (Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service ;providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek 11 plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and !input from relevant agencies regarding this development. • jEnclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. ;Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at (406) 556-5868. 'Sincerely, Land W st onsulti g, LC ZV Z M Ekstrom, P.E. P oject Manager !Enclosures I Icc: File ICADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 31 MedTrans 12-6-04.doc i 1 September 13, 2005 Bozeman Police Department Attn: Mark Tymrack„ Chief of Police P.O. 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Chief Tymrack: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City.of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service j providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and . input from relevant agencies regarding this development. Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at(406) 556-5868. Sincerely, Land es Con ing,LLC lU M Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures cc: File CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 31 Police 12-6-04.doc • I September 13, 2005 ;Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks !Attn: Kurt Alt 1400 S. 19th Ave. jBozeman, MT 59715 I Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Mr. Alt: i IThe Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly least of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service jproviders regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. i We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and input from relevant agencies regarding this development. The City will require we provide a jcomment letter from FWP prior to accepting our preliminary plat submittal. i J Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. Additionally, we have ,attached a Preliminary Wildlife Assessment for the project prepared by Robert L. Eng, PhD ;Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at(406) 556-5868. Sincerely, 'Land West C nsulti LC 7 M t Ekst om, P.E. Project Manager j Enclosures cc: File i ICADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PRO]ECTS13959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 23 FW&P 12-06-04.doc i i I � • I I September 13, 2005 Bozeman Fire Department j Attn: Greg Megaard, Deputy Fire Marshall JP.O. 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision I Dear Mr. Megaard: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service ;providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and input from relevant agencies regarding this development. • Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. i ;Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at(406) 556-5868. (Sincerely, i !Land West Consultin , LC i 1MA Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager 'Enclosures j cc: File ! ICADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROIECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 31 Fire 12-6-04.doc I i j i September 13, 2005 i Scott Adolf Qwest Communications 12707 West Main l Bozeman, MT 59715 i Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision . Dear Mr. Adolf: r The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified 'Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and input from relevant utility companies regarding provision of service to the development. • Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. We will be contacting your office for locations of utility conduits or special easement requirements, etc. that will be i needed on the preliminary plat. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions,please contact me at(406) 556-5868. i ISincerely, Land West on Iting, L I � 9 j Matt Strom, P.E. i Project Manager j Enclosures i cc: File i CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\.3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 30 Qwest 12-6-04.doc I i ...9 i 1 • • t i I September 13, 2005 I NRCS/Gallatin County Conservation District Attn: Matt Drechsel 3710 Fallon St. Bozeman, MT 59718 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Mr. Drechsel: The Legends at Bridger Creek I1 Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek 11 plat. i • Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. I We currently have the baseline soils information provided by your agency regarding the soil i types in the project area. However, we are interested in any additional comments, questions, or concerns you may have regarding the current project. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please contact me at(406) 556-5868. i Sincerely, Land West C ns ti LC i I M tf Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager I Enclosures cc: File I i CADocuments and SettingsVnekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\utility letters\Sec 21 NRCS 12-6-04.doc • I i • September 13, 2005 BFI Harry Kirschenbaum P.O. Box 10370. Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision i Dear Mr. Kirschenbaum: jThe Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is a proposed 125 lot subdivision located directly east of the Legend at Bridger Creek I subdivision and north of the Mt. Baldy and Ed Vogel Subdivisions off of Bridger Canyon Drive. In accordance with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), we are soliciting comments from public and private service 1 providers regarding availability of services for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II plat. j We are preparing to submit the preliminary plat to the City and are interested in comments and • ; input from relevant utility companies regarding provision of service to the development. I Enclosed for your review is the Pre-application Plan and vicinity map. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions,please contact me at (406) 556-5868. Sincerely, LanZWes�ConsultiC I i MaMtkstrom, P.E. Project Manager Enclosures 1 cc: File i i I HA3384\019\DOCS\PREPLAnSec 28 Solidwaste 12-6-04.doc I i Bozeman Division Michael Cech,P.E. Operations Superintendent 121 East Griffin Drive Telephone:(406)582-4615 Bozeman,Montana 59715 • � � estern Cellular:(406)581-2816 Facsimile:406-585-9634 Far:(406)585-9634 michaeLcech a�orthwestern.com www.northwesterneneraV.Com Energy September 24, 2005 Land West Consulting, LLC Attn: Matt Ekstrom, P.E. 1807 West Dickerson, Suite D Bozeman, Montana 59715 RE:Proposed Legends at Bridger Creek 2 in Bozeman: Matt, Regarding your letter of September 13, 2005, Northwestern Energy is willing and able to provide service to the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek 2 Subdivision in Bozeman. These services can be provided in accordance with applicable Montana Public Services • rules and regulations and the current Northwestern Energy tariff schedule. Northwestern Energy will want to determine the locations of all transformers and underground lines and equipment to provide for maintenance and installation. We also would require all adequate & appropriate utility easements along lot lines and roads in accordance with common subdivision design practices. Natural gas service is also available in this area, and installation of electric and gas service to this proposed development will not significantly impact service to existing facilities in this area. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns at 582-4615, also, we require having a copy of the approved plat of this proposed area prior to providing a cost to bring in these service. If installation is required prior to approval of the plat, it will be the responsibility of your office to keep us informed of any changes which would alter our utility design and installation. Sincerely, Michael J. Cech P.E. Operations Superintendent . Bozeman Division e _.: Facilities • v.. Gary J. Griffith s o Director 404 West Main,P.O.Box 520 Phone (406) 522-6009 Bozeman,Montana 59771-0520 Fax: (406)522-6060 9/20/2005 MATT EKSTROM, P.E. LAND WEST CONSTULTING, LLC 1807 W. DICKERSON, SUITE D BOZEMAN, MT 59715 Subject: Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision Dear Matt: Please reference your letter of September 13, 2005 concerning the Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision. We would:expect that 125 housing units would generate the following students: • ''K-5 • 25 Students ♦ 6-8 12 Students ♦ 9-12 16 Students As of the district's official count dated October 2004 we have the following number of spaces available in our classrooms: ♦ K-5 74 ♦ 6-8 145 ♦ 9-12 30 During the last 24 months we have responded to similar requests for information totaling the following potential numbers of students: K-5 891 Students ♦ 6-8 446 Students ♦ 9-12 652 Students Our existing bus system can accommodate your additional students. Sin y, Gary ffith Dom'' r of Facilities • Bozeman ScHool'District#7 • 0 0 September 19, 2005 Attn: Matt Ekstrom, P.E. Project Manager Land West Consulting, LLC 1807 W Dickerson, Suite D Bozeman, Montana 59715 I have reviewed the updated plans for the proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision. Provided that all streets,houses, entrances, etc. are logically marked and clearly lit, I see nothing which would obstruct the response of our ambulances. Urban sprawl is a concern for Emergency Medical Services throughout the nation. With 125 increased lots,the demand for EMS needs will rise. In this particular location, Bozeman Fire Department provides an initial response. AMR adheres to a City of • Bozeman Ordinance to provide ALS ambulance coverage within 8 minutes 90%of the time. Our closest ambulance is located at 2101 Industrial Drive in Bozeman. Typically, responses to the Bridger Creek Golf Course area are—4 minutes, depending on weather conditions. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kris Kaull, Operations Manager • 2101 Industrial Drive, Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone(406)586-0037 • Fax(406)586-0536 • s • . ... . . r.. .. + , . . � . . '�,. . . , �" . . .•.s w• + - • • &VoYLtaqa Visk9 s L Matt Ekstrom Land West Consulting, LLC 1807 W. Dickerson, Suite D Bozeman, MT 59715 12/19/05 Dear Matt, I've reviewed your development plans for the Bridger Creek II subdivision. I tend to agree with Bob Eng on the value of this property to wildlife. I think 75 feet setback from the riparian area is an absolute minimum. 200 feet would certainly better facilitate wildlife movement along this narrow strip of habitat along the stream corridor. With the degree of development planned and already existing in the area, there really is not much room to coordinate opportunities for minimizing impacts to wildlife. Deer, mountain lion, bear, and moose could certainly use this stream corridor on a seasonal basis. Perhaps the most effective way to minimize.potential, and probably conflicts is through covenants that prohibit or restrict use of bird feeders, fencing, dogs and instruct residents that feeding wildlife is illegal. That includes the use of salt blocks for attracting deer and other bi game ani ls. Also, addressing the storage and disposal of garbage and usin b ar• co ers when and where appropriate. Craig Jo onnais Wildlife biologist R-3 Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Bozeman, MT 59718 ©onpa4Qa September 19, 2005 Matt Ekstrom, Project Manager Land West Consulting, LLC 1807 W. Dickerson, Suite D Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision, Gallatin County, Montana • Dear Mr. Ekstrom: I am not aware of any negative impact that proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision would have on our ability to deliver our services to the residents of Gallatin County. If I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, John A. Nordwick President & CEO JAN/cdi • Tel: 406 585 5000 1 Fax:406 585 1070 915 Highland Boulevard I Bozeman, MT 59715 vwvw.bozemandeaconess.org RECEIVe® 2 9 2005 BR C5� • Communications Bresnan Communications 511 West Mendenhall Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Tel:800.823.6766 Fax:406.586.6381 www.bresnan.com 9-26-05 Morrison Maierle,Inc 901 Technology Blvrd. Bozeman MT. 59718 - RE: Legends at Bridger Creek PH-2 Subdivision Bresnan Communications is planning on serving this Subdivision.We will install our conduit with NorthWestern Energy. We will design over the route that they choose. If the proposed easements work for them it will work for us. You can get the culvert locations from NorthWestern Energy. After our design is done it could be possible that we would need some additional easements for a Node or Power Supply location. We do not know the locations until we • get NorthWestern Energy's route and get an actual design established. Scott Riis Techni a ions Supervisor your link to TOMORROW 09/30/2005 FRi 12:07 FAX � � 0002/002 • , Waste Systems September'30,2005 Brownstone Capital Inc. Matt Ekstron 1807 W.Dickerson, suite D Eazemwi,MT 59719 Re: The Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision. Dear Mr, Ekstrom.: The proposed Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision,is within one of our established residential Collection routes. We foresee no problem in providvlg residential garbage collection service within this development. • Sincerely, Marry.Kirse enbasAm Marketing;Director • Pn Rnx 107*10 Rn7A nan AAnntana 5P79 Q Phnnp.AOR-RAR-f)WIR Fax`1()A-;R7-Ag1)Q • • 19 • Cross Sections 60' PUBLIC ROW 1 .0' 0.5' 0.5' 1 .0' 5.0' 6.5' 7.0' 10.0' 10.0' 7.0' 6.5 5.0' SIDEWALK BOULEVARD PARKING DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE PARKING BOULEVARD SIDEWALK 2 LANE ROAD SIDEWALKS/PARKING/BOULEVARD BOTH SIDES 3% 3% ,- 35.0' BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB - DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 0.5' 31 .0' BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB 0.5' 6'-10' P.U.E 7.0' 10.0' 10.0' 7.0' 6'-10 P.U.E. PARKING DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE PARKING 2 LANE ROAD DRIVE LANE/PARKING/ BOTH SIDES 3% 3% 30' PUBLIC ROW 30' PUBLIC ROW o \ / 2' 2' o o r g' 8' 0 DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE 20' GRAVEL SURFACE 10' 10' LEGENDS AT BRIDGER (2) #4 BAR RUNNING LONGITUDINAL — KEEP 2" CLEAR.:FROM DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANE BTM AND SIDES CREEK II Street SECTIONS 3% 3% 3% 3% LWC LEGENDS at BRIDGERCREEK II ' 20 GRAVEL ALLEY 1 6 PAVED ALLEY CLIENT:EDGEFIELD FIELD WORK:MMI DATE:10/28/05 PLOTTED DATE: Dec/20/2005 DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:NTS DRAWING NAME: C:PRQIECT/}959/002/ACAD/EJ090TS/STREET SECTIONSPUD.OML CHECKED BY:MEE PROJ #:LEGENDSII SHEET PAGE OF T—PACE wm LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II �. _ STREET SECTIONS 1 OY46AN-ROAD—— / \ _ / TUMBLING WATERS CT. i MAIDEN SPIRIT ST. J / LEIDGEFIELD CT. / EDICINE WHEEL LN. BOYLAN ROAD / MIDFIELD ST. w z I-V 4 3 I I LWC LEGENDS �r BRIDGER CREEK II�•� um one srrt n mmm n s»u �(M s�sxm r:t>A w-wn CLIENT:EDGEFIELD STREET SECTIONS PLOTTED DATE: Jan/24/2006 FlELD WORK•MMI DATE:12/20/05 DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:1'-200 DRAWING NAME: a PRo�CTp U es9/DD2/�C�o/PRE-PT/ROAD—tk.LCCAnoR.o CHECKED BY'MEE PROD fLEGENDS11 SHEET PAGE OF 1-PAGE • 20 o Construction Route Map \ • � , � •ter�" `.� \ �_ ' 1 , Em h wo,z tt,- .___Np ...//��L HI ICINI AP NOT T ULLM JLJ VV LEGENDS AT f � l I _. �`\ �. I_� -.._. -�_--�r�_�� _. �.; �u-'�.. -�,�. ,. •� /'.--��y.�:' i.- �'. �\fir��1�_. r� 1- � .. PLOTTED ,.. SHEET -OF • • a • E 21 i 1 • r o � • • Subdivision Perimeter Treatment 0 • Subdivision Perimeter Treatment A fence will be built along our common boundary line with the Mcafee / Dehann, property (COS 2408 Tract 713) to the west. See the attached drawing for fence details. An alley will be built along our south property line. This was a condition of annexation. See the cross-section appendix for details. • e e >� r Z 0 0 m 0 ? -� N � 0 � -4x O �-{] X m �-' X i71 4� N to N N -+ m M. a p v pvz 19 p. ° T4 ulo N Cl� m7F1 1,i 0 _v- 21 H..t 6.b.ocw bt LIEM T \CE Z 0:406 58,MT b971b O S DIO ARCHITlRS G:606 b66-6777 f,606 b66-177b DOZED lam, 0 • 1 ON, XIX- (A -H � Z ------------ va r � m 0 ® _v :iN..ce.e..cwsc LIENW ,�� Ho DIO ARCMITFCM o,406 Eli�777716/wl� f:�06616-177! wmjm. mr ,pi06�d • SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SUPPLEMENTS • Introduction This application is for subdivision review of the Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision. The Legends at Bridger Creek I1 Subdivision is made up of three parcels of land. The first parcel is 57.29 acres. This tract of land is more particularly known as: A tract of land located in the North one-half(N 1/2) of the South one-half(S 1/2) of Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East, M.P.M., Gallatin County, Montana, which tract is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SE 1/16 section corner of said Section 32 run South 88 degrees 57' 05" West along the South 1/16 section line for 2626.98 feet to an iron pin and the SW 1/16 section corner of said Section 32, thence run North 3 degrees 15' 42" West along the West 1/16 section line of said Section 32 for 1314.28 feet, more or less, to the tread of the stream of Bridger Creek; thence run southeasterly along said thread of the stream for about 3250 feet to the East 1/16 section line of said Section 32,thence run South 3 degrees 25' 38" East along the East 1/16 section line of said Section 32 for 894.39 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning being Tract 2 as shown on"Plat recorded in Film 12, Page 825." The other parcels are lots 27 and 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision, a subdivision in Gallatin County, Montana, according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana(Plat Reference: F-10). • The referenced properties have been annexed and zoned R-1 by the City of Bozeman. The vicinity map on the preliminary plat indicates the location of the project. A copy of this plat has been included in this submittal. • CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doe • • • ADDITIONAL SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT SUPPLEMENTS Surface Water Bridger Creek defines the northern boundary of the subdivision. Protection of this resource is a high priority and an open space corridor has been provided along the creek (see the attached Master Park Plan for details). No construction is planned in the open space along the creek with the exception of a possible trail. Permits: • A MPDES storm water construction permit will be applied for and approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. • An approach permit for the ingress and egress point onto Bridger Canyon Drive has been applied for from MDOT and is included in the Traffic Study appendix. Flood Plains A portion of the 500 and 100 year flood plain along Bridger Creek is located on the northern portion of this project. • The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map, Panel 8 of 21, (Revised 7/15/88), for the city of Bozeman details the 500 and 100 year flood plain for Bridger Creek adjacent to the proposed project. A topographic survey was preformed for the express purpose of correlating the on-site elevations to the FEMA survey elevations. A copy of this survey report and a detailed map is included in the Flood Plain appendix. All planned improvements, including buildings, streets, water and sewer will be constructed outside of the flood plain. Groundwater Eleven groundwater monitoring wells were installed April, 2004. Groundwater levels were monitored through the end of July, 2004. An exhibit showing the well locations and resulting data is included in the Groundwater appendix. The Legends at Bridger Creek II will be serviced by the City of Bozeman municipal sewer system, therefore eliminating groundwater degradation problems. Geology, Soils and Slone • Geologic Hazards CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc • ! • The only known geologic hazard associated with this site is the inclusion of the Gallatin Valley in the seismic zone three. Seismic ranking runs from 0 to 4, with 4 having the most earthquake potential. All utilities will be buried, which reduces the potential for property damage and personal injury. Building construction will adhere to all seismic zone three regulations. A Phase 1 environmental study was preformed on the site and no known environmental hazards were found. See the Phase 1 appendix for details. Soils Data provided by the NRCS indicates two soil types on the project site. These soils types are Sudworth—Nesda Loams (+ 88%) and Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex (+ 12%). The on-site soil presents constraints to development that are typical in the Bozeman area. All construction will take place in the Sudworth-Nesda Loam soil type. This soil type has a high clay content and potential for frost action. The above limitations have been dealt with successfully on past projects with the use of accepted engineering practices. • Design of the storm water drainage facilities will consider different soil types,plant species and a potentially shallow water table. Design of all parking lots and streets will follow accepted engineering practices to determine structural sections and may include the use of separation fabrics based on soil condition and traffic loading requirements. Site dewatering may be implemented during construction to insure proper installation of the underground infrastructure. All necessary erosion control permits will be obtained prior to construction. Slopes The proposed subdivision site is relatively flat. The existing grade from front to back is+ 1%. Vegetation The project site is comprised mainly of farm land and has been used to produce grass hay (smooth brome) in the recent past. Aside from some shrubby vegetation along the parcels boundary, the majority of the vegetation lies along the Bridger Creek stream corridor. • C\Documents and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc • • • A complete wetland delineation report for the property is included in the Wetland appendix. A 75' wetland setback from the jurisdictional wetlands will protect the wetland area and the well developed riparian habitat along the creek. A noxious weed survey was performed in June 2004. The following plants were identified: Canada Thistle, Common Tansy, Poison Hemlock and Leafy Spurge. A noxious weed management plan is located in the appendix. Wildlife The project area does not serve as a critical game range nor does it currently support any observable endangered species. The site's history of agricultural use limits the quantity and variety of wildlife. One project goal was to increase the wildlife variety and sustainability by retaining open space and enhancing the existing riparian corridor. A preliminary wildlife assessment was performed by Robert L. Eng, PhD, a certified wildlife biologist and is included in the Wildlife appendix. Fences within the subdivision will be limited to a height of 3'6"to allow for the free movement of animals that may pass through the area(see the attached draft design guidelines in the appendix for fence details). The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan has designated the proposed subdivision area suitable for residential development. • Historical Features Larry Lahren, Ph.D., of Anthro Research, Inc.,performed a cultural resource evaluation of the site in April 2004. The report concluded there were no indications that any National Register or other cultural resource properties had been recorded on the project site. In addition, a field reconnaissance evaluation did not locate any prehistoric or historic cultural resource sites. A copy of the evaluation and recommendation for project approval is included in the Cultural Resources appendix. If historic materials are encountered during construction, Dr. Lahren, or another qualified resource specialist will be contacted for evaluation and recommendation. Agriculture Aside from the stream corridor and flood plain the majority of the parcel was used for agricultural purposes. Approximately 47 acres of the property was used to produce grass hay (predominately Smooth Brome). The property to the east, west and south are residential and the property to the north is currently agricultural. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc • Agricultural Water User Facilities Aside from Bridger Creek there are no hydrology sources on the property. An agricultural ditch used to exist on the south boundary of the property, but has been abandoned. See in the Agricultural Water Use appendix the documentation provided by the Creekwood Subdivision that proves the ditch has been abandoned. Water, Sewer and Stormwater The City of Bozeman's water and sewer systems have adequate capacity to handle the proposed subdivision needs. Water and sewer design reports are included in the Water and Sewer Design Report appendix. A stormwater drainage report is located in the Grading and Drainage Plan appendix. Connection to Existing 18"Water Main: The City of Bozeman currently has an 18" water supply main that runs from the Lyman Creek Reservoir to the city's distribution system. This main will be re-routed through the property to conform to the proposed street alignments. We are proposing the following connection method: 1) Install a new 18" ductile iron main along the proposed street alignment 2) Pressure and bacteriological test the new main • 3) Make the tie-in connection to 18" existing main—chlorine swab the tapping valve 4) Remove or slurry fill the abandoned existing main. Streets, Roads and Alleys Currently the site is accessed by Story Mill Road. In compliance with the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, two means of access have been provided for the proposed subdivision. One is through The Legends of Bridger Creek I Subdivision to the west. The other is through the proposed Creekwood Subdivision to the east. In addition, an access is provided to Bridger Canyon Drive through lots 27 and 28 of the Mount Baldy Subdivision. This location has been approved by MDOT for a field access point (an approach permit for subdivision use has been applied for). This access aligns with the Headlands Subdivision access on the south side of Bridger Canyon Drive. Story Mill Road and Bridger Canyon Drive will provide traffic flow to and from the proposed subdivision. Story Mill is classified as a Collector Street in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update. Under current configuration, Story Mill Road contains two lanes, one each north and south bound, and approximately 26 feet total paved width. South of Bridger Canyon, Story Mill Road is a 25 foot wide gravel roadway. Bridger Drive (P 86) is a State Primary Highway, and is classified as a • Principal Arterial in the 2001 Transportation Plan. Bridger Drive transitions to North CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc • Rouse Avenue as it proceeds in a north/south direction through the City of Bozeman. Within the study area, the paved roadway is approximately 28 feet wide with two twelve foot travel lanes with two foot shoulders. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH. See the traffic study in the Traffic Study/Approach Permit appendix for details. Access to Arterials B. Lots The lots within Legends at Bridger Creek I1 will not have direct access to arterial roads. Dust All of the streets proposed for this project are to be paved, therefore dust will not pose a problem upon completion. Measures will be taken to control dust on any proposed alley ways that are not paved. Dust created during construction will be controlled in accordance with the standard practices described in the Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Handbook. Pollution and Erosion Street maintenance will be performed by the City of Bozeman in accordance with the City's standard operating procedures and maintenance requirements. Any surface runoff will be treated by on site detention/retention ponds, which will collect runoff from the site as shown on the stormwater report located in the Grading and Drainage Plan • appendix. The terrain on the proposed site is gentle and erosion is not anticipated to be a problem. Construction sediment will be controlled in accordance with the standard practices described in the Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Handbook. Control of construction-related dust and sediment accumulations will be required as part of all contracts. Traffic Generation and Capacities A traffic impact analysis has been conducted for the project and is included in the Traffic Study/Approach Permit appendix. Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths A trail corridor will run along the entire northern boundary of the project. This trail system will connect the trails built with the Legends at Bridger Creek I to the west and with the Creekwood Subdivision trails to the east. North/South trail connections will also be provided to connect the Bridger Canyon Drive area to the trail system along Bridger Creek (see the attached preliminary plat for locations) Utilities The utility companies affected by the current project will be sent a preliminary plat for • their review. The Northwestern Energy, Qwest, and Bresnan Communications currently CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc • • • provide electric, gas, telephone, and cable services to the adjoining neighborhood and therefore should be able to provide services to this project. Easements and utility conduits will be provided in the proposed development to allow for the standard installation of the dry utilities. Solid Waste Solid waste generated by the subdivision will be collected by a contracted collection service upon customer preference. Final waste disposal will be at the Logan landfill. Educational Facilities The proposed subdivision is located in School District Seven. Based on the current lot count the following calculations estimate the number of students this subdivision will produce: Single Family Residential Lots = 127 Lots Number of Students (0.4 Students per Household) = 51 Students Elementary School (2/3) = 34 Students • High School (1/3) = 17 Students A letter was sent to Bozeman School District requesting their input regarding this subdivision. Land Use The project parcel is zoned R-1. All proposed uses will conform to the requirements of the R-1 zoning as defined in the UDO. The UDO requires that 10% of the buildable net acreage be dedicated to Restricted Size Lots (RSL's). The RSL's in an R-1 residential zoning need to be 5000 SF. Additionally, the RSL lot is limited to 1515 SF of total floor area(i.e. total SF of the house not the foot print on the ground). The RSL lots have been designated on the attached preliminary plat. The following is the RSL calculation: • Total Buildable Net Acreage (i.e. Net Lot Area) = 21.88 acre =954,431 SF • 10% of the Total Buildable Net Acreage =95,443 SF • RSL's provided = (20)— 5000 SF lots • CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc • Parks and Recreation Facilities The park dedication is 4.35 acres (see the map located in the Parks and Recreational Facilities for details). A trail corridor will run along the entire northern boundary of the project. This trail system will connect the trails built with the Legends at Bridger Creek I to the west with the Creekwood Subdivision trails to the east. North South trail connections will also be provided to connect the Bridger Canyon Drive area to the trail system along Bridger Creek(see the attached preliminary plat for locations). Due to the presence of critical lands; the isolated wetland located on the west property line, and the closeness of Bridger Creek to the property boundary in this area, the park street frontage requirement of 100% will not be meet.. The following is our mitigation plan: 1) Additional Requirement A: Pedestrian access to all perimeters of the park not along the street. A 6' wide natural fines trail will be continued from Legends I along the north side of the proposed park(see the attached Master Park Plan, done by Peaks to Plains Design, P.C.). 2) Additional Requirement B: Additional park area will be provided. The required park acreage is 3.78 acres. The park acreage provided is 4.35 acres. The amount of additional park area to be provided has to equal the area of parking that would • have been provided had the street been located on 100% of the park perimeter. Therefore, the additional park area needs to be: • Total LF of park perimeter missing= 822 LF = 1644 LF (both sides of street) • Additional Park Area=(1644 LF)x(7' —width parking space) = 11,508 SF = 0.26 acres • Required= 3.78 + 0.26 =4.04 acres 3) Additional Requirement Cl: A 23 stall parking lot is proposed for"Legends Park" (see the attached park plan for details). The required number of stalls to mitigate the lack of street parking is: • 1644 LF/24' —length of parallel parking space = 68 stalls • We have provided 23 stalls—we are short 45 • The cost for the shortage of parking spaces;::�$60,000 (45 stall;z� 15,000 SF—estimated cost= $4.00/ SF) 4) Additional Requirement C2: play ground equipment, a soccer field, a clubhouse for the HOA, and public bathrooms will be constructing in the park. The estimated value of this park development is approximately $500,000. This value • is higher than the cost of the parking space shortage above. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc 0 • . . The open spaces will be designated as"common open space"on the final plat. Neighborhood Center Plan A clubhouse for the Home Owners Association is proposed for the park located in the north-west corner of the project. This along with the park compromise our neighborhood center plan(see Master Park Plan for details). Lighting Plan See Lighting plan in the,appendix for details. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\Supplements.doc "� A Flood Plain • GROUND TRUTH FEMA MAP FOR PRE-APPLICATION SUBMITTAL LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II BOZEMAN,MT • NOVEMBER 2005 MMI#3959.002.01.010.0310 PREPARED BY: MORRISON CAI MAIERLE,INC. An Employee-Owned Company • Ground Truth FEMA Map for Legends II Pre-Application Submittal • 1.0Introduction The Federal Emergency Management Agency,(FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map,Panel 8 of 21,(Revised July 15, 1988),for the City of Bozeman details the 100-year and 500-year flood plain for Bridger Creek, adjacent to Legends At Bridger Creek Phase II. This map was used to verify that the improvements for the project will not be constructed within the 100-year flood hazard area of Bridger Creek. A copy of FIRM Panel 8 of 21 is included with this submittal. 2.0 Methodology In accordance with requirements set forth in §60.3 of the NFIP regulations, project elevations(based on the NAVD88 vertical datum)were adjusted to the NGVD29 vertical datum as published on the FIRM panel using a constant vertical shift of-3.91 feet across the project property. The shift was established based on a level loop tied at USC&GS benchmark P 492. Additional survey information is attached to this document. A site plan for the project, with existing ground contours adjusted to the FEMA datum was prepared for this study. Two of the cross sections shown on FIRM Panel 8 are within the property boundary of the proposed project. Upstream cross section J crosses near the east property boundary,and cross section I is located near the middle of the project property. Published base flood elevations(BFE)range from 4741' on the downstream(west)end of the property to 4773' on the upstream (east)end of the property sloping nominally at—0.84%over—3700 feet measured longitudinally along the centerline of Bridger Creek. In order to ground truth the flood hazard boundary for zone AE as published on FIRM Panel 8,the published • cross sections(I&J)and associated BFE sections were superimposed on the site plan with 1-foot existing ground contours derived from site-survey data. At each BFE section,the intersection points of the published elevation with the existing ground were determined,establishing a ground-truth width of the floodplain at that section. The ground-truth boundary of the 100-year flood hazard area zone AE was then determined using the recommended method of contour interpolation between the established ground-truth points of elevation intersection. For three BFE sections on the south side of Bridger Creek(4752',4756' &4757'),an intersection point with existing ground could not be established; this may be attributed to localized soil compaction resulting from livestock&agricultural activity. Previous observations of the current landowner, indicate that these low lying areas within the project have experienced some inundation during past flood events. The ground-truth flood hazard boundary for zone AE is shown on attached Exhibit A. 3.0 Summary The ground-truth 100-year flood hazard boundary established for this project generally agrees well with that shown on FRIM Panel 8. However,since storms larger than the 100-year event can occur, it is suggested that any proposed layout provide sufficient conveyance through the subdivision between the south side of Bridger Creek and the naturally existing outfall on the western property boundary. The engineer's design report and subdivision layout will be part of the grading and drainage plan as submitted at the time of the preliminary plat. All planned improvements, including buildings, roads,water and sewer,will be constructed within zone X as published,outside of the designated 100-year flood hazard boundary, zone AE. • I i • i i o L1 MORRISON MAIERLE INC. �o � memo i TO:. Matt Ekstrom ; ROM: 'Shannon Marinko .SUBJECT: Story Mill Vertical Datum I PATE.: 7/8/2003 i i $Iere are the reduced results of the level loop for the Storey Mill project. The elevation of the northwest corner of Tract 7B of COS 2408, on file in the office of the Galltin County Clerk and iRecorder, is 4729.045 feet. This comer is a blue Morrison-Maierle plastic cap on a 5/8"rebar, get in the asphalt and referenced to the NGVD29 datum which is currently used by FEMA, • i The ioop:data can be seen on the attached.LevelPak Level Line Report which is a product of the Leica NA 2002 digital level, and functions as the original field book. i The loop commenced at USC&GS benchmark P 492 and looped up to the corner and then closed back on this point,with a closure of 0.01 feet. USC&GS benchmark T 563 was verified during this loop with a closure of 0.04 feet. I have attached the NGS datasheets for these two benchmarks. Since this project was originally completed using the NAVD88 datum a shift of-3.91 feet will provide an adequate equation for this project. This equation is based on the shift between the :&10 datums at USC&GS benchmark P 492 . i I�f you have py fFur,fig questions please let me know. J. MARINKO i = No. 14456LS ;o o. ki L L i i i i i i . 1Pak Level Line Report L ve p Proj e t : level.2 Gene ated : 08/07/2004 at 11:38:58 Unit : US Feet NGVD29 Level Line : RAW Line 003 Heights : Adjusted Active ft Name Back Tp. Intmdt. Fore Dist Height Comments x P492 4765.080 Vertical BM, x P492 2.3290 0.00 elevation x 5.9740 141.53 established 3.48' x 4761.435 below BM, at x 4.9690 180.86 ground level x 6.5060 154.05 x 4759.898 x 3.1630 181.26 X D 7.0740 177.28 x 4755.987 x 8 1."8860 202.17 ix 8.1370 207.19 x 4749.736 x 2.7920 169.14 x 5 6.2890 185.40 x 4746.239 x � 2.4690 168.27 x K 6.3160 169.37 x 4742.392 x 2.5450 194.02 • x 8.7600 189.67 x 4736.177 x p 3.0880 181.96 x f6 6.6200 177.90 x B 4732.645 x 2.9500 187.65 j x 5.5360 180.96 x 9 4730.059 x 4.3940 185.04 x 7.7580 187.08 x 10 4726.695 x 0 4.2450 187.24 x it 4.8190 195.15 x 11 4726.121 x � l 4.5900 173.18 x �2 3.8660 167.35 x 12 4726.846 x 12 4.2500 0.00 x 13 1.6760 72.27 x 23 4729.420 j x 13 5.7190 86.37 . x IL4 4.3870 133.19 x �4 4730.752 x 14 6.6650 161.67 x I5 7.0440 210.23 x is 4730.373 x 5 5.9560 171.72 x 16 5.9240 183.74 x 16 4730.405 x 16 4.3280 179.87 x 17 6.2580 174.89 j x �7 4728.475 x 17 5.4760 179.29 x 18 4.3840 174.16 • x '8 4729.567 x 18 4.8270 203.12 x 9 5.9980 180.24 j x 19 4728.396 i i i i I _ ! • I x 19 4.1890 184.58 x 20 3.5400 0.00 x 20 4729.045 NW Corner x 20 3.6220 227.33 Tract 7B ix 21 5.2420 130.99 COS 2408 x 21 4727.425 x 21 6.4850 276.24 i x 22 4.2230 259.24 x 22 4729.687 x 22 5.0450 49.54 x 23 7.6870 81.33 x 23 4727.045 x 23 7.3410 95.63 x 24 6.5250 169.28 x 24 4727.861 x 24 3.8010 188.54 x 25 7.6580 193.54 x 25 4724.004 x 25 3.3770 203.83 x 26 9.1510 171.41 x 26 4718.230 x 26 3.5290 194.04 x 27 9.4200 202.00 x 27 4712.339 x 27 3.0910 230.51 x 28 6.3900 211.16 x 28 4709.040 I x 28 5.3080 207.61 x 29 4.7500 209.38 x 29 4709.598 x 29 7.9010 208.06 x 30 3.0500 0.00 x 30 4714.449 x 30 5.8760 191.98 • x 31 1.0540 204.40 I x 31 4719.271 x 31 8.8660 186.56 j x 32 4.2970 208.12 Il x 92 4723.840 x 32 7.6770 182.42 x 33 3.2050 184.43 x 33 4728.312 x 33 10.9790 180.92 x 34 3.0760 199.83 x 34 4736.216 x 34 5.5530 186.29 x 35 4.5160 184.63 x 35 4737.253 x 35 7.7540 167.13 x 36 3.2030 144.36 x 36 4741.804 x 36 8.9900 154.54 x 37 2.1640 164.46 x 37 4748.630 x 37 3.7010 101.94 x 563 4.2600 0.00 x 563 4748.071 Vertical BM i x 563 4.3300 0.00 elevation hx 38 3.9040 154.82 established 4.60' x 38 4748.497 below BM, at ! x 38 5.9750 189.53 ground level ! x 39 3.2350 203.00 j x '39 4751.237 ! x 39 5.3360 183.03 x 40 2.1060 211.51 x 40 4754.467 x 40 5.1390 181.08 • x 41 1.1640 213.58 x 41 4758.442 x 41 5.8230 186.27 ! x 42 2.0580 203.19 I I I ' r i • x 12 4762.207 x 42 5.7240 182.97 'x 43 4 A570 145.33 x 43 4763.574 x 43 6.6760 149.53 I x P492 5.1700 0.00 x P492 4765.080 i Level!Line Memo: 1. Level line start point 11001' .2. Level line end point 11001' 3. Detected level loop ! 4. Chicking completed I I I ' I ' i i i I i j j � I ! I I i i I i I I I . I I i I I I i i DATASHEETS • Page 1 of 2 I The NGS Data Sheet See fileasdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. . DATABASE = Sybase ,PROGRAM = datasheet, VERSION = 7.03 1 I : National Geodetic Survey, Retrieval Date = JULY 8, 2004 QX0225 QX0225 DESIGNATION - P 492 QX0225 PID - QX0225 QX0225 STATE/COUNTY- MT/GALLATIN QX0225 USGS QUAD - BOZEMAN (1987). :QX0225 I QX0225 *CURRENT SURVEY CONTROL QX0225 QX02.25* NAD 83 (1986) - 45 41 21. (N) 111 01 38. (W) SCALED QX0225* NAVD 88 - 1454.652 (meters) 4772.47 (feet) ADJUSTED QX0225 :QX0225 GEOID HEIGHT- -10..92 (meters) GEOID03 QX0225 DYNAMIC HT 1454.-141 (meters) 4770.79 (feet) COMP: QX0225 MODELED GRAV- 980,214 .0 (mgal) NAVD' 88 QX0225 ' QX0225 VERT ORDER - FIRST CLASS II .-QX0225 QX0225.The horizontal coordinates were scaled from a topographic map and have QX0225.an ;estimated accuracy of +/- 6 seconds. • :QX0225 QX0225.The orthometric height was determined by differential leveling QX0225.and adjusted by the National Geodetic Survey in June 1991. QX0225 QX0225.The geoid height was determined by GEOID03. QXg225 QX0225.The dynamic height is computed by dividing the NAVD 88 QX0I225.ge6potential number by the normal gravity value computed on the QX0225.Geodetic Reference System of 1980 (GRS 80) ellipsoid at 45 QXC22t.degrees latitude (g = 980.6.199 gals.) . QXC225 QXd225.The modeled gravity was interpolated from observed gravity values. QXL225 QX 225; North East Units Estimated. Accuracy QXC225;SPC MT - 161,100. 481,080. MT (+/- 180 meters- Scaled) QX0225 QXC225 SUPERSEDED SURVEY CONTROL QXq 225 , QXC225 NOVD 29 (??/??/92) 1453 .460 (m) 4768.56 (f) ADJ UNCH 1 2 QXC225 QXC225.Superseded values. are not recommended for survey control. QXC225.NGS no longer.adjusts projects to the NAD 27 or NGVD 29 datums. QX0�225.See file dsdata.txt to determine how the superseded data were derived. QX0225 QX0I225_U.S. NATIONAL "GRID SPATIAL ADDRESS: 12TVR978595 (NAD 83) QX0225 MARKER: DB = BENCH MARK DISK QX0225 SETTING: 36 =.BUILDING QX0225 STAMPING: P 492 1957 QX0225 MARK LOGO: CGS QX$25_STABILITY: B = PROBABLY HOLD POSITION/ELEVATION WELL QX01225 QX0;225 HISTORY - Date Condition Report By t i h"-i/www noc nnaa vnv/rai_hin/rlc rN;A nrl/1 '7/0ilnnA i DATASHEETS • Page 2 of 2 QX0225 HISTORY - 1957 MONUMENTED CGS .QX0225 HISTORY - 1958 GOOD NGS • QX0225 HISTORY - .1982 GOOD NGS QX0225 QX0225 STATION DESCRIPTION QX0225 QX9225'DESCRIBED BY NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY 1958 QX0225'INIBOZEMAN. QX0225'ATIBOZEMAN, ALONG THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, AT THE STATION, IN QX9225 I SECTION 6, T 2 S, . R 6 E; SET VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHEAST FACE OF THE QX0225'STATION AND MIDWAY BETWEEN 2. TICKET OFFICE WINDOWS, 26 FEET SOUTHWEST "QX0225'OFITHE MAIN TRACK, AND ABOUT 2 1/2 FEET ABOVE THE PLATFORM. QX0225 QX6225 STATION RECOVERY (1982) QX0225 QX002251RECOVERY NOTE BY NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY 1982 QX0225'REC6VERED IN GOOD CONDITION. THE 1958 DESCRIPTION IS ADEQUATE WITH QX0225'THE'EXCEPTION 'THAT THE RAILROAD STATION IS NOW THE BURLINGTON QX0225'NORTHERN. I **�It retrieval complete. Elipsed Time = 00:00:00 I I i I i i i I' I I ' I I i • i I i httn:%/www.nL7.q.nnaa..unv/rvi-bin/(lc nisi nrl/l '7i5Zil0na i DATASHEETS Page 1 of i i i Th NOS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase ,PROGRAM = datasheet, VERSION = 7.03 1 I National Geodetic Survey, . Retrieval Date = JULY 8, 2004 QX0468 QX(I468 DESIGNATION - T 563 QXC468 PID - QX0468 QXC468 STATE/COUNTY- MT/GALLATIN QXC468 USGS QUAD - BOZEMAN (1987) QX(468 QXC468 *CURRENT SURVEY CONTROL. :QXC468 QXC468* NAD 83 (1986) - 45 .41 38. (N) 111 01 54. (W) SCALED QXC468* NAVD 88 - 1449.819 (meters) 4756.61 (feet) ADJUSTED QX0468 QXC468 GEOID HEIGHT- -10.94 (meters) GEOID03 QXC468 DYNAMIC HT - 1449.309 (meters) 4754.94 (feet.) COMP QXC468 MODELED GRAV- 980,213.8 (mgal) NAVD 88 QXC468 OBS GRAVITY - 980,210.3 (mgal) GRAV_OBS QXO1468 QX0468 VERT ORDER - FIRST CLASS II QXQ468 QX0I468.The horizontal coordinates were scaled from a topographic map and. have • QXQ-1I468.aniestimated accuracy of +/- 6 seconds.QXC468 QXC468.The orthometric height was determined by differential leveling QX 468.and adjusted by the National Geodetic Survey in June 1991. QXC468 QX 468.The geoid height was determined by GEOID03. QX0468 QX 468.The dynamic height is computed by dividing the NAVD 8.8 QX0468.geopotential number by the normal gravity value computed on the QX0468.Ge6detic Reference System of 1980 (GRS 80) ellipsoid at 45 QX0468.degrees latitude (g = 980.6199 gals.) . QX0468 QX0468.The modeled gravity was interpolated from observed gravity values. QX0468.The observed gravity was obtained from relative gravimeter ties QX0468.tolthe IGSN71 gravity network. QX0468 QX0468; North East Units Estimated Accuracy QX0468;SP MT - 161,630. 480,750. MT (+/- 180 meters Scaled) QX0468 QX0468 SUPERSEDED SURVEY CONTROL QX0468 QXO 68.Noisuperseded survey control is available for this station. QX0468 QX0468—U.S. NATIONAL GRID SPATIAL ADDRESS: 12TVR975600(NAD 83) QX0468—MARKER: DB = BENCH MARK DISK QX0468 SETTING: 38 = PIER QX0168_ST,lMPING: T 563 1982 QX0.468_MARK LOGO: NGS • QXOi468_STA'BILITY: A = MOST RELIABLE AND EXPECTED TO HOLD QX0,468+STABILITY: POSITION/ELEVATION WELL QXOI468 QXO(�68 HTSTORY - Date Condition Report By httq://www:nes.noaa.Qov/cQi-bin/d-, nicl.nrl/.l 7/R/')1)0a. DA.TASHEETS Page 2 of 2 I I� QX0468 HISTORY - 1982 MONUMENTED NGS QX0468 QX¢468 STATION DESCRIPTION QX0468 QX0468 'DESCRIBED BY. NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY 1982 QX446810.6 KM (0.35 MI) NW FROM BOZEMAN. QX046810.6 KM (0.35 MI) NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN. RAILROAD QX101468'FROM THE RAILROAD STATION IN BOZEMAN, SET VERTICALLY IN THE NORTHWEST QX0468 'FACE OF THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY 1 OF 2 PIERS OF THE EAST BOUND OVERPASS QX04681OFIINTERSTATE HIGHWAY 90, 11.7 METERS (38.4 FT) WEST OF THE CENTERLINE . QX0468'OF ROUSE AVENUE AND 7.1 METERS (23 .3 FT) SOUTHWEST OF THE NEAR RAIL. QX0468 -THE MARK IS 1.2 M ABOVE THE GROUND. *** retrieval complete. Elapsed Time = 00:00:00 i i i I i I i I j I I I http:%/www,ogs.noaa..go,y/cgi-binds Uid.Drl/l 7/R/2004.:. . a s c D H r Q N J H!rl_^fit_ ZONE% t QSKGAL iLD00 H—DA[EAB DIUNDATED BY 10aYGl�M eti- � LONE 7 • :Due AteS o G [On9 An rnAvY m+rrirrr � J ZONE ZONE% ZONE X • N , .N.r>,mi..«:.... _ a�mlm m ZONE 111 rr LONE X ZONE X _ �ZONE o � ZONE X [anL v r Z a n+r••,I� ZONE% '\ x 1 ♦a ' « . AE 1 S � ZONE% mow:rm tm.J..ry rr..r.. G• iLWDMAV A[EAE IN[UxL AL \ u v ZONEX c ZONE o �� omwlL000 aREws ZONE x IT28 ZONE X b O [Dxe• —1 nr soon..rme a i K J Iroy.n rma.Im n w emm. ZONE X '� c,ra:tDo HawAu[[r ]i rau AxD rAcv �rN.n�a.n :n ar.bm ZONE $ n o=nEA A[EAs f Z S 1 ZONE% ZONE O :oNEo n� �an roes wvms� RLYII ZONE X ` _ ZONE X ZONE AE ZONE X ZONE AE /j Q� T: LONE AEoll ZONE X , ,>.vt Drw bt aEe1ee0nr ZONE% ZONE X 2 \ � V 4mJ e..ibot Eb.�WWm C WINb Srvl,1 ibaE zonE x I \\� / --SN-- B m ibM Elmrbn lhV:EY —I ZONE% Inu un ub[rr 20 EX / 0—� ua.srlum Lw \�y[\ ij IEL>en a ibvE min»Nnn b ,P ZONEX RLT/% E—.wrrmr.Mn `TSqEPORATE.LIMITS e.rnaseemwN,ama leant vmkJ O,mm of lEM r' J I L Q Tw NOTES I I / /i/' I j mr�od a�wn�a 6tcJrmt nmmArmmmav�.beDrmns AT I ZONE X /�'� nooa..n n.m m,m.n ImsrE. L/ LAT 705 ZONE x D I oflma1m°�...'"aan:::r�m,•sao.'7emlmm.v:cm`mwo „•` I umu ur[mer..mr.,otrY,w.mraaty JrM.m. I I L T I I � !__„_._� a..b,.amK.m.....•.Ded.m.inm I:.n:v.ma I n<i, /// rmramm rvr.•..mr.lw tnm,e r.tl�. 20NEAE 7I5 ,ZONE% + ,n '� NEwNrvnr ZONE ZONE% 7-�ONE x ' rw�wb,.••on:..,aw..tr.:�Ammm.wrm.,rr.,. — I I r♦� \ - X ,mmw r..u.r,J..m,rm.brm,oaem.l �JI 1 B pppp 119 = INIEEBRUAIIY�I e.11e)On: I \ t1 iLOOD IIAL..D UNDAAr MAf REYISIOnf: en t \ ZONE �U$ f[DAIURr n.uoe •, \ ZONE X _ 1� iL00D INSU[AnCE RATE VAf Efff.CDVb � \ 1" II✓ \ ♦719' F \ iL�Aor Ie�VEtl�ryWrT��pm-4.nY.Dmmv,:s Wr ♦ :m r mrU,p,�Au,lvrtrsum:rrrm•brnm:r�mr \ ZONE% ZONE X A \\ ZONE AA 7Tf ONE x \ ZONE% w I—Dlrv+cr—rrzT— ZONE X / ZONE X I I � • \ Tn ZONE% \ / InD ` '- zoNEx \a+ 20NE AE / ZONE X ZONE X CMLrv\].u i L_ J Mcmm� t IF / \�\- � 1' ZONE x / ZONE% Ir I ONE S ZONE% CO 114 ---- CORg7RAif LIN J -- o L-- `% �I. U AIITIDMAL FLOOD INSUANCE FUSN --8�2� o Lys .� p� \ • ZONE x o/ ZONE% GALL TIN FIRM L B \ emYEARN ooDCONTAINEO DUIKRT AE \ � ' FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP S 1 O D �\` II 1 pel o � ' 1 \a ��_ it CITY OF o „P [� BOZEMAN, - ZONE H N ITIa ��� `+ 'I� MONTAATA zoNEx j GALLATINCOUNTY I151 RMIy 1L5 _ rIr 1>ss ZONE X � m 1 TLe LZONE% 115'L 1187 \ A+p \' I PANEL 8 OF 21 [ I. � A � fi` I� I ery lvota.onrw[u rroT rNlxT[ ZONE T P\le IArrn t• ZONE AE S 1 C N ZONE, itd j COMMUNITY•PANELNUMBEN 1I ',i 300028 0008C I I n r ZONEA 9 1"f ► 0 / ° ONE v I I DULY OIS,19M Ilse _ / I, 4 J I�� i♦ `� ZONE x L u G_ �ir„ sT.•wa um f •x.x ZONE ZONE x � e ,{��p�� I,a l_._� .,• ZONE X J '�a� ♦nal � "'" ,_ 3_� ` __ _ O -ITe1 >ee 1 y I FtDe.1 Ene,grlley BLnayemenl Aemq I'! ... .... ............ ................................ ...................... ................................_... ......... ...... .................................... ._..-_..._.... _............... .._............ ...... ....... _.... i , \ ........... , , i `, , \..-._.. ;. . 4 .i\ : I 1/ i .\�. .. / f 742 4743 ,f , �r y , , , , it \ . 44 r ....._. • fl' 4745 % �1 , •I , 4746 ,• i •,. � , ,/ •. I '/ i.:/III Ji�i. ,i;/ii 4747 , i , 4748 ,..._....,\;.. 4749 , 750 -� , , , 2 4 • • �, t, � ;,.� ,:ice : •. ........ r /-... , " ' ........- 8:' •, , 4, 60 y/ • J ! , ;r ..._._.._. .......... 3 I' 47 ....... > , , III � 4765 \• / , .................. m g 0 `i mix _` ..... � •\ .477 a �� \ ........ e.. I Q ' cn Ana 4� � •. �i�\`a , ...V.8•'�. .. .. ` __ 1 D \ , r , , „ a. z O ',1 to 774 r dam 22 � �rl �0 q i 775 r 1 der I 4 r' a ry � t AA e. I AN i -�� � ' '1} �. � ��� �. fir, 1. '1� r � �•� , 1 I J 1i}y1V�� I '..,.,.•� ... + r X.. .. . .. i ,r,. •, F - GRAPHIC SCALE-- 0o so +oo loch - lOD R '� .rn w }l -.{ r•_i..p, pow �MORRISON EXHIBIT A MAIERLE,It+c. - FEMA BFE pp •f ��• r r+yrwr o.,..� 3 V ! .. •( GROUND TRUTH }• - P,, ` }i •, 1a CLIENT:RUGHEIMER 9 1 f i 3i it! ♦ •i - r. .. #. G ' i � ! i T •�1 PLOTTED DATE: FIELD WORK• DATE:07/2§&O DRAWING NAME: 0 •,� _ ,�u 1 Q.. - yt :� �4. { DRAWN BY: MEP SC ALE:1'm100'(fuleizel CHECKED BY• PROJ .3959-00201 SHEET --I--OF ---L— � � � s 8 �• x� • •, Groundwater • Legends At Bridger Creek II - Groundwater Monitoring Wells Monitor Well#7 Monitor WCII H8 Monitor Well#9 Monitor Well#10 Monitor Well#11 .Monitor Well#17 Monitnr Wrll#1 i Mnnitor_Well#14 Monitor Well#1 S. Monitor Well#16 Monitor Well#17 Top of Well Top of Well. Top of Well Top of Well Top of Well Top of Well Top of Well Top of Well Groundwater Top of Well Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Top of Well Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Top of Well Casing Groundwater Date Casing,,,,• Level Relative Casio Relative Level Relative Casing Relative Level Relative Casing Level Relative •• Casing Level Relative Casing " Relative Casing Relative Casing Casing Relative Rel Relative to g to Relative to Relative to e e Relative to level to -... . Level Relative Casing Relative Level Relative• Relative to Iwel Relative to Level Relative, Relative to Level Relative Groundwater to Ground to Groundwater to Ground Groundwater to Ground Groundwater to Ground Groundwater to Ground Groundwater to Ground Groundwater to Ground to Groundwater to Ground Groundwater Ito Ground Groundwater to Ground Groundwater Level to Ground Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) Level(ft) Surface(ft) (ft) Surface(ft) 4/1/2004 4/8/2004 4/16/2004 4/22/2004 4/29/2004 5/7/2004 Dry Dry 8.51 -7.12 Dry Dry 6.89 -5.50 6.12 4.73 Dry Dry Dry Dry 5/14/2004 Dry Dry 8.51 -7.12 Dry Dry 6.91 -5.52 6.2 -4.81 Dry Dry Dry Dry 5/21/2004 Dry Dry 8.39 -7.00 Dry Dry 6.87 -5.48 6.24 -4.85 Pa Dry Dry Dry 5/27/2004 Dry Dry 1 7.93 -6.54 Dry Dry 6.49 -5.10 5.92 4.53 Dry Dry Dry Dry 6/3/2004 Dry 9.42 -8.03 7.52 -6.13 Dry Dry 6.15 -4.76 5.74 -4.35 Dry Dry Dry Dry 6/11/2004 Dry 9.16 -7.77 7.12 -5.73 Dry Dry 2.45 -1.06 5.25 -3.86 Dry Dry Dry Dry 6/18/2004 Dry 8.75 -7.36 6.96 -5.57 Dry Dry _5.17 -3.78 5.07 -3.68 D D 9.15 -7.76 Dry 6/25/2004 D 9.23 -7.84 7.38 -5.99 D D 5.72 4.33 5.5 -4.11 Dry Dry 6.73 -5.34 Dry 7/2/2004 Dry 9.4 -8.01 7.6 -6.21 Dry Dry 6.01 4.62 5.7 -4.31, Dry Dry Dry Dry 7/9/2004 Dry 9.5 -8.11 7.68 -6.29 Dry Dry. 6.09 4.70 5.83 4.44 Dry Dry D Drvl 7/16/2004 Dry 9.68 1.29 7.84 G.45 D D 6.18 -4.79 5.98 -4.59 D D D Dry 7/23/2004 D 9.72 -8.33 7.95 -6.56 D D 6.28 -4.89 6.08 -0.69 D D D Dry I 7/30/2004 D 9.6 8.21 7.95 6.56 D D 6.4 5.01 6.2 4.81 Dryl Dry Dryl Dryl • i H:\23681006\DOCS\Wells\GWMonitorWells.xis ...... '--,,ACCEPTS ACCEPTED REBA 4 7 LINE < � � .'IJ THR •D OF--STREAM \,SUR f jtUNUb lbtld:,XUNN 4 06/2005-- �,.:' \ t, �,`/ / � r i'�i \ '� } /`� /, l;• -,.., :\• '•\ '�,, i III; : / ���� � ;7 A." ` � I 13 ......... ------------- ------ ol % ol v F! The following well logs are for existing wells located in Township 1 South, Range 6 East, Section 32. The wells are from the surrounding properties and subdivisions. One Page Site Report-- GWIC0 Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report . CYSEWSKI BEN J Location Information GWIC Id: 92050 Source of Data: GW4 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 Latitude(dd): 45.7062 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0098 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 21-22 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 29.00 How Drilled: Static Water Level (ft): 29.00 Driller's Name: Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: Yield (gpm): 20.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 6/1/1960 Test Type: Special Conditions: Test Duration: Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' Wall Pressure No Hole Diameter Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 0.0 29.0 6.0 1 STEEL Annular Seal Information Completion Information' No Seal Records currently in GWIC. No Completion Records currently in GWIC. Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 4.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 4.0 23.0 GRAVEL 23.0 25.0 SANDY CLAY 25.0 27.0 CLAY 27.0 29.0 SAND CLAY&GRAVEL '-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. • These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92050&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC0 9 Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • VOGEL EDWARD H. Location Information GWIC Id: 92073 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 CDC Latitude(dd): 45.6996 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0137 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 47 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 20.00 How Drilled: HAND DUG Static Water Level (ft): Driller's Name: Pumping Water Level (ft): 6.00 Driller License: Yield (gpm): 5.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 1/1/1900 Test Type: HAND Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: STOCKWATER Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information) [Froml To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0120.01 18.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 0.0 20.0 18.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 20.0 20.0 18.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information No Lithology Records currently in GWIC. 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92073&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC Page 1 of 1 is Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report KOLB H H &AUGUSTA H Location Information GWIC Id: 92051 Source of Data: GW2 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 Latitude(dd): 45.7062 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0098 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 23&33 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 30.00 How Drilled: CHURN Static Water Level (ft): 9.00 Driller's Name: ]ONES Pumping Water Level (ft): 30.00 Driller License: WWC017 Yield (gpm): 30.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 7/15/1962 Test Type: PUMP Special Conditions: Test Duration: 0.33 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0 30.0 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 5.0 30.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 30.0 30.0 6.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 2.0 TOPSOIL 2.0 18.0 GRAVEL 18.0 28.0 FINE GRAVEL 28.0 30.0 CLAY; SAND&GRAVEL 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92051&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC. Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report . CYSEWSKI BEN J Location Information GWIC Id: 92050 Source of Data: GW4 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 Latitude(dd): 45.7062 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0098 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 21-22 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 29.00 How Drilled: Static Water Level (ft): 29.00 Driller's Name: Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: Yield (gpm): 20.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 6/1/1960 Test Type: Special Conditions: Test Duration: Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time (hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' Wall IPressure No Hole Diameter Records currently in GWIC. From To DialThicknessl Rating Joint Type 0.0 29.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Completion Information' No Seal Records currently in GWIC. No Completion Records currently in GWIC. Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 4.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 4.0 23.0 GRAVEL 23.0 25.0 SANDY CLAY 25.0 27.0 CLAY 27.0 29.0 SAND CLAY&GRAVEL 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note:non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92050&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC • Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report SIEVERT CECIL Location Information GWIC Id: 92057 Source of Data: GW2 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 C Latitude(dd): 45.7025 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0150 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude (feet): Lot: 15-16 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 29.50 How Drilled: CHURN Static Water Level (ft): 9.00 Driller's Name: ]ONES Pumping Water Level (ft): 29.50 Driller License: WWC017 Yield (gpm): 30.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 9/18/1963 Test Type: PUMP Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0 29.5 6.01 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 0.0 29.5 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 29.5 29.5 6.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 4.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 4.0 25.5 GRAVEL 25.5 27.0 CLAY 27.0 29.5 SAND 29.5 30.0 SAND&GRAEL 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92057&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC• Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • WILLIAMS FRANK E.AND THELMA Location Information GWIC Id: 92061 Source of Data: GW4 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 C Latitude(dd): 45.7025 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0150 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 11 AND 12 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY SUB Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 32.00 How Drilled: Static Water Level (ft): 11.00 Driller's Name: Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: Yield (gpm): 15.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 4/1/1959 Test Type: Special Conditions: Test Duration: Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC IRRIGATION Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information Casing Information' lFroml To IDiameter 0.0132.01 6.01 No Casing Records currently in GWIC. Annular Seal Information Completion Information' No Seal Records currently in GWIC. No Completion Records currently in GWIC. Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 9.0 CLAY 9.0 32.0 SAND&GRAVEL 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92061&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC• . Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report DEL DUCA LEILAN &MARIO Location Information GWIC Id: 147683 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 CC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0176 DNRC Water Right: C091391-00 Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 33 Certificate of Survey: Addition: MT BALDY Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 40.00 How Drilled: ROTARY Static Water Level (ft): 10.00 Driller's Name: HAGGERTY Pumping Water Level (ft): 35.00 Driller License: WWC353 Yield (gpm): 30.00 Completion Date(m/d/ft 6/30/1994 Test Type: AIR LIFT Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): 35.00 Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): 10.00 Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): 1.00 Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To JDiarneter Wall Pressure 0.0140.01 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating 3oint Type -2.0 35.0 6.0 .250 WELDED STEEL 20.0 40.0 4.5 160.00 WELDED PVC Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' lFroml To IDescription #of Size of 0.0 20.0 BENTONITE From To Dia Openings Openings Description 40.0 40.0 4.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 35.0 GRAVEL 35.0 36.0 CLAY 36.0 50.0 CLAY 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=147683&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC* • Page 1 of 2. Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report DEAN ROBERT B.AND RUTH W. Location Information GWIC Id: 92071 Source of Data: GW4 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 DC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0072 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 37-40 Certificate of Survey: Addition: ED VOGEL Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION #1 Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 40.00 How Drilled: Static Water Level (ft): 15.00 Driller's Name: ]ONES Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: WWC017 Yield (gpm): 100.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 10/15/1958 Test Type: Special Conditions: Test Duration: Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC IRRIGATION Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' From To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0 40.0 6.01 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 6.5 40.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 40.0 40.0 6.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 6.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 6.0 27.0 GRAVEL 27.0 32.0 BLUE CLAY 32.0 33.5 FINE SAND&GRAVEL 33.5 40.0 GRAVEL • 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92071&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC• Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report TURNQUIST SIDNEY I. Location Information GWIC Id: 92082 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 DC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0072 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 34-36 Certificate of Survey: Addition: ED VOGEL Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION #1 Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 35.00 How Drilled: CHURN Static Water Level (ft): 14.00 Driller's Name: ]ONES Pumping Water Level (ft): 35.00 Driller License: Yield (gpm): 15.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 8/28/1959 Test Type: BAILER Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To IDiameter Wall Pressure 0.0 30.0 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating 3oint Type 0.0 30.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 30.0 30.0 6.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 6.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 6.0 20.0 GRAVEL 20.0 28.0 CLAY 28.0 29.0 FINE GRAVEL 29.0 30.0 CLAY 30.0 35.0 FINE GRAVEL&SAND 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92082&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC0 Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report WALL RICHARD Location Information GWIC Id: 92083 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 DC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0072 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: ED VOGEL Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION #1 Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 102.00 How Drilled: CHURN Static Water Level (ft): 18.00 Driller's Name: JONES Pumping Water Level (ft): 70.00 Driller License: Yield (gpm): 8.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 4/30/1958 Test Type: BAILER Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To iDiameter Wall Pressure 0.0195.01 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating 3oint Type 0.0 95.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 65.0 70.0 6.0 SLOTS Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 10.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 10.0 35.0 COARSE GRAVEL 35.0 39.0 CLAY&GRAVEL 39.0 72.0 GRAVEL 72.0 78.0 CLAY&GRAVEL 78.0 95.0 GRAVEL 95.0 100.0 CLAY • 100.0 102.0 GRAVEL&SAND 1-All riiamafarc rannrtarl ara innirlr+.rliamatar of tha r;;ginn http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92083&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report . JACOBSON SEIVERT Location Information GWIC Id: 92085 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 DC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0072 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: ED VOGEL Type of Site: WELL SUBDIVISION #1 Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 34.00 How Drilled: CABLE Static Water Level (ft): 14.50 Driller's Name: ]ONES Pumping Water Level (ft): 34.00 Driller License: WWC017 Yield (gpm): 15.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 10/4/1958 Test Type: BAILER Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: • Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFromi To IDiameter Wall Pressure 0.0134.01 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type -1.0 34.0 6.0 1STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 34.0 34.0 6.0 I JOPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 5.0 TOPSOIL&CLAY 5.0 26.0 COARSE GRAVEL 26.0 32.0 CLAY 32.0 35.0 FINE GRAVEL 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92085&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWI Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report MOSHIER RONALD L.AND MARY A. \ Location Information GWIC Id: 92088 Source of Data: GW4 Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 DC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude (dd): -111.0072 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: 44-47 Certificate of Survey: Addition: ED VOGEL SUB#1 Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 30.00 How Drilled: Static Water Level (ft): 14.00 Driller's Name: Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: Yield (gpm): 40.00 Completion Date(m/d/ft 10/1/1959 Test Type: Special Conditions: Test Duration: Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To IDiameter Wall Pressure 0.0130.01 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 0.0 30.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 30.0 30.0 6.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information No Lithology Records currently in GWIC. '-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. • http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=9208 8&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC9 • Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report SWINGLE WESLEY MARK&ELIZABETH Location Information GWIC Id: 92055 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 BC Latitude(dd): 45.7081 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0176 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 72.00 How Drilled: CABLE Static Water Level (ft): 10.00 Driller's Name: ]ONES Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: WWC017 Yield (gpm): 20.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 3/26/1979 Test Type: PUMP Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' From To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0172.01 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating ]oint Type -1.5 72.0 6.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 72.0 72.0 6.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 10.0 TOPSOIL 10.0 30.0 GRAVEL 30.0 43.0 CLAY 43.0 48.0 SAND&GRAVEL W/CLAY 48.0 60.0 GRAVEL 60.0 65.0 CLAY 65.0 72.0 CEMENTED GRAVEL • 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opS ite.asp?gwic_id=9205 5&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC� • Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • RUGHEIMER PETER Location Information GWIC Id: 139076 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 BDA Latitude(dd): 45.7091 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0111 DNRC Water Right: C086508-00 Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 140.00 How Drilled: ROTARY Static Water Level (ft): 65.00 Driller's Name: HAGGERTY Pumping Water Level (ft): 130.00 Driller License: WWC383 Yield (gpm): 20.00 Completion Date(m/d/ft 4/17/1993 Test Type: AIR LIFT Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): 65.00 Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): 1.00 Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To jDiameter Wall Pressure 0.0 140.0 6.0 From To IDia Thickness Rating Joint Type -2.0 112.0 6.0 .250 WELDED STEEL 99.0 140.0 4.5 160.00 WELDED PVC Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' lFroml To IDescription #of Size of 0.0 20.0 BENTONITE From To Dia Openings Openings Description 112.0 140.0 4.0 1/8 DRILLED HOLES Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 1.0 TOPSOIL 1.0 25.0 CLAY 25.0 60.0 CLAY GRAVEL 60.01 80.0 CLAY 80.0 112.0 CLAY GRAVEL 112.0 115.0 CEMENTED GRAVEL 115.0 140.0 CLAY GRAVEL • 1-All riiamatarc rannrtarl ara innirlP riiamatar of tha racinn. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=139076&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC& • Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • RUGHEIMER HALLIE Location Information GWIC Id: 92056 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 BDC Latitude(dd): 45.7072 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0137 DNRC Water Right: C061569-00 Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 50.00 How Drilled: FORWARD ROTARY Static Water Level (ft): 10.00 Driller's Name: HAGGERTY Pumping Water Level (ft): 30.00 Driller License: WWC353 Yield (gpm): 17.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 6/12/1986 Test Type: PUMP Special Conditions: Test Duration: 2.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported • Recovery Time (hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFromi To IDiameter Wall Pressure 0.0150.01 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 0.040.0 6.0 STEEL 40.0 50.0 4.5 PVC Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' From To I Description #of Size of 0.010.01DRILL MUD From To Dia Openings Openings Description 40.0 50.0 4.5 1 FACTORY SLOTTED Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 3.0 TOPSOIL 3.0 50.0 CLAY&GRAVEL MIX 1 All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no • responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92056&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC0 • Page 1 of 1 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • JACKSON DON Location Information GWIC Id: 145401 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 BCD Latitude(dd): 45.7072 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0163 DNRC Water Right: C091486-00 Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 75.00 How Drilled: CABLE Static Water Level (ft): 8.00 Driller's Name: MAHURIN Pumping Water Level (ft): 61.00 Driller License: WWC359 Yield (gpm): 20.00 Completion Date(m/d/ft 4/10/1994 Test Type: PUMP Special Conditions: Test Duration: 3.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): 65.00 Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): 8.00 Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported • Recovery Time(hrs): 1.00 Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC IRRIGATION Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' From To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0 35.0 10.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 35.0 75.0 6.0 0.062.0 6.0 .250 WELDED STEEL 55.0 75.0 4.5 PVC Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' lFroml To IDescription #of Size of 0.0 35.0 BENTONITE From To Dia Openings Openings Description 62.0 75.0 4.5 1/2IN DRILLED HOLES Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 6.0 TOPSOIL BLACK 6.0 40.0 CLAY AND GRAVEL BROWN 40.0 60.0 CLAY AND SAND BROWN 60.0 75.0 GRAVEL AND SAND BROWN '-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. ® These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted. Note: non-reported casing,completion,and lithologic records may exist in paper files at GWIC. http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=145401&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report -- GWIC. • Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • LEGEND OF BRIDGER CREEK SUBDIVISION Location Information GWIC Id: 222041 Source of Data: DRILLERWEB Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 CB Latitude(dd): 45.7044 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0176 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 120.00 How Drilled: ROTARY Static Water Level (ft): 11.00 Driller's Name: BRIDGER DRILLING Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: WWC560 Yield (gpm): 90.00 Completion Date(m/d/y): 10/20/2005 Test Type: AIR Special Conditions: NEW Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): 100.00 Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): 11.00 Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported • Recovery Time(hrs): 1.00 Well/Water Use: IRRIGATION Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To IDiameter Wall Pressure 0.01120.01 6.01 ia Thickness Rating I Joint I Type 1.5 89.5 6.0 0.2501 200.00 WELDED A53A STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' lFroml To IDescription #of Size of 0.0 20.0 BENTONITE From To Dia Openings Openings Description 73.01113.014.01 80 .5 FACTORY SLOTTED Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 13.0 SANDY BROWN CLAY 13.0 22.0 CLAY BOUND GRAVEL H2O 22.0 45.0 GRAVEL AND SAND 45.0 57.0 CLAY BOUND GRAVEL 57.0 83.0 SANDY BROWN CLAY 83.0 120.0 CEMENTED SMALL AND LARGE GRAVELS AND SAND '-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=222041&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC� • Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • LEGEND OF BRIDGER CREEK SUBDMSION Location Information GWIC Id: 222042 Source of Data: DRILLERWEB Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 CB Latitude(dd): 45.7044 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0176 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude (feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 120.00 How Drilled: ROTARY Static Water Level (ft): 10.00 Driller's Name: BRIDGER DRILLING Pumping Water Level (ft): Driller License: WWC560 Yield (gpm): 60.00 Completion Date(m/d/ft 10/18/2005 Test Type: AIR Special Conditions: NEW Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): 100.00 Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): 10.00 Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported • Recovery Time(hrs): 1.00 Well/Water Use: IRRIGATION Well Notes: Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0 120.0 6.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 2.0 109.0 6.0 0.250 220.00 WELDED A53A STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information) lFroml To IDescription #of Size of 0.0 20.0 BENTONITE From To Dia Openings Openings Description 100.0 120.0 4.0 801.5 FACTORY SLOTTED Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 12.0 SANDY CLAY AND GRAVEL 12.0 47.0 SMALL GRAVELS AND SAND 15GPM 47.0 53.0 SANDY BROWN CLAY 53.0 72.0 SEMI CEMENTED GRAVEL AND SAND 15 GPM 72.0 83.0 SANDY BROWN CLAY 83.0 90.0 SAND AND GRAVEL 10 GPM 90.0 108.0 SANDY BROWN CLAY AND GRAVEL • 108.0 120.0 CEMENTED LARGE GRAVEL 1 -All riinmatpm rannrtari ara ineidp.rb;4matar of tha racinn http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=222042&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 One Page Site Report-- GWIC Page 1 of 2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Plot this site on a topographic map Ground-Water Information Center Site Report • VOGEL DAVID SR Location Information GWIC Id: 92066 Source of Data: LOG Location (TRS): 01S 06E 32 CC Latitude(dd): 45.7006 County(MT): GALLATIN Longitude(dd): -111.0176 DNRC Water Right: Geomethod: TRS-TWN PWS Id: Datum: NAD27 Block: Altitude(feet): Lot: Certificate of Survey: Addition: Type of Site: WELL Well Construction and Performance Data Total Depth (ft): 22.00 How Drilled: HAND DUG Static Water Level (ft): 5.00 Driller's Name: OWNER Pumping Water Level (ft): 5.00 Driller License: Yield (gpm): 10.00 Completion Date(m/d/ft 6/6/1942 Test Type: BARREL Special Conditions: Test Duration: 1.00 Is Well Flowing?: Drill Stem Setting (ft): Shut-In Pressure: Recovery Water Level (ft): Geology/Aquifer: Not Reported Recovery Time(hrs): Well/Water Use: DOMESTIC Well Notes: t Hole Diameter Information asin Information' lFroml To Diameter Wall Pressure 0.0 22.0 48.0 From To Dia Thickness Rating Joint Type 0.0 8.048.0 STEEL 8.0 22.0 24.0 STEEL Annular Seal Information Com letion Information' #of Size of No Seal Records currently in GWIC. From To Dia Openings Openings Description 22.0 22.0 24.0 1 OPEN BOTTOM Lithology Information From To Description 0.0 10.0 BLACK DIRTY&CLAY 10.0 22.0 COARSE GRAVEL 22.0 27.0 BOULDERS 27.0 36.0 COARSE GRAVEL 36.0 44.0 OPEN 1-All diameters reported are inside diameter of the casing. These data represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and date of the retrieval. The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user. Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/oldata/opSite.asp?gwic_id=92066&agency=mbmg&session... 12/14/2005 c -+A. V t�y�"_, W" T "! C c C a -� • i i .� Phase 1 a 0 'I • ORIGINAUCOPY NO. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT The Legends at Bridger Creek Story Mill Road Bozeman,Montana 59715 16 June 2005 PREPARED FOR: Edgefteld,LLC 430 Ryman • Missoula,MT 59802 PREPARED BY: Higgins Consulting Engineers,LLC 430 Ryman PO Box 7158 Missoula,MT 59807-7158 } (406)728-4600 i Fax(888)800-6243 I 1 i Project No. 10089 I i i i • This report is an instrument of service prepared by Higgins Consulting Engineers for the exclusive use of Edgefteld, LLC (Client). In order to create a report on which the Client could rely, Higgins Consulting Engineers worked closely with the Client in development of the scope of service upon which all subsequent tasks have been based. No party other than the Client is permitted by Higgins Consulting Engineers to rely on this instrument of service. With the permission of the Client, Higgins Consulting Engineers will meet with a third party, approved in writing by the Client, to help identify the additional services required, if any,to permit such third party to rely on the information contained in this report,but only to the same extent of the Client's reliance, and subject to the same contractual, technological, and other limitations to which the Client has agreed. Higgins Consulting Engineers believes the findings, recommendations, specifications and professional opinions presented in this report were prepared in reasonable accordance with ASTM E 1527, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. There is no other warranty,either express or implied. Signature License Number Senior Engineer Higgins Consulting Engineers,LLC 1 I i I • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Number and Title pie# EXECUTIVESUMMARY............................................................................................................................................i 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................I 1.1 Purpose..........................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment...................................................................................................1 1.3 Limiting Conditions and Methodology Used................................................................................................2 -4Defimtions.....................................................................................................................................................3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Location and Legal Description.....................................................................................................................4 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics....................................................................................................................4 2.3 Descriptions of Structures,Roads,and Other Improvements to the Site.......................................................4 2.4 Information Reported by User.......................................................................................................................4 2.5 Current Uses of the Property.........................................................................................................................5 2.6 Past Uses of the Property................................................................................................................................5 2.7 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties.............................................................................................................5 2.8 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions.....................................................................5 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW.....................................................................................................6 3.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources......................................................................................................7 3.2 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions.....................................................................8 4.0 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES...................................................................................................................9 • 4.1 Review of Topographic Maps........................................................................................................................9 4.2 Site GeoIogy..................................................................................................................................................9 4.3 Regional Groundwater Quality and Occurrence............................................................................................9 4.4 Aerial Photo Review....................................................................................................................................10 4.5 Historical Maps............................................................................................................................................10 4.6 Ownership/Occupancy Information.............................................................................................................10 4.7 Permit Review..............................................................................................................................................10 4.8 Zoning..........................................................................................................................................................10 4.9 Contact with Current On-Site TenanttOwner..............................................................................................10 4.10 Other Interviews......................................................................................................................................11 4.11 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions...............................................................I I 5.0 INFORMATION DERIVED FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS.............................12 5.1 Hazardous Substances in Connection with Identified Uses.........................................................................12 5.2 Unidentified Substance Containers..............................................................................................................12 5.3 Storage Tanks..............................................................................................................................................12 5.4 Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs).......................................................................................12 5.5 Indications of Asbestos Containing Materials(ACMs)...............................................................................12 5.6 Indications of Solid Waste Disposal............................................................................................................12 5.7 Physical Setting Analysis.............................................................................................................................12 5.8 Other Conditions of Concern.......................................................................................................................13 5.9 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions...................................................................13 6.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS...............................................................................................................A4 7.0 REFERENCES..................................... i List of Figures Figure 1—Vicinity and Site Map Figure 2—Site and Adjacent Property Map Figure 3—Topographic Map List of Appendices Appendix A—Site Reconnaissance Photographs Appendix B—ESA Scope of Service I• i I i ............. f EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)of a portion of the The Legends at Bridger Creek Site, located off Bridger Canyon Road,northeast of Bozeman, Montana(Site). Higgins Consulting Engineers conducted the ESA in June 2005 for Edgefield,LLC,the prospective buyer of the Site. The Site is described as LOTS 27 AND 28 OF MOUNT BALDY SUBDIVISION AND A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE N % OF THE S % OF SECTION 32, T1S, R6E, P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. Higgins Consulting Engineers endeavored to perform this Phase I ESA in substantial conformance with the scope and limitations ofASTM Standard E1527. 1 The Site is currently undeveloped and vacant. The property encompasses 56 acres and appeared to be planted with an alfalfa crop. Trees and shrubs were observed bordering the north property boundary, along Bridger Creek. A representative of Higgins Consulting Engineers inspected the Site on June 9, 2005. The Higgins Consulting Engineers representative did not observe indicators of hazardous substances or petroleum products (as defined herein) during the site reconnaissance. Indicators of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products were not observed on any adjacent properties. Historical information and information obtained from the current property owner, Hallie Rugheimer, i revealed that the Site had been only used for agricultural purposes in the past. Vehicle bodies were iobserved along the banks of Bridger Creek. According to Hallie Rugheimer, the vehicles were placed there in the 1950's or earlier. Because the vehicles were placed in their current location prior to 1964, • their removal is not required under current State laws, according to Darrell Stankey, of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality's (MDEQ) Motor Vehicle Recycling Program. If the vehicles are removed in the future,however,Mr. Stankey stated that permits must be obtained from the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation(DNRC)and the Montana State Fish Wildlife and Parks (FWP). The following information was obtained during the review of environmental databases and records: (1) the Site was not listed in any Federal ASTM Standard database; (2) no adjacent properties were listed in the State UST database; and, (3) Three properties in the Site's vicinity were either listed in the State CECRA database, Federal CERCLIS database or the State Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. Additional information about the nature of the releases at the above-listed release sites was obtained from State records and other supporting documents in order to determine whether, or not, these release sites have impacted the Site, or might pose a significant environmental threat to the Site. The information obtained from the State records and other supporting documents reviewed for this ESA suggests that none of the listed sites have caused environmental contamination of the subject Site. Furthermore, the information contained in these State records suggested that the above-listed sites would not pose a significant threat to the subject Site in the future. This ESA produced no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions affect the Site. i i i 4 • 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is to identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes identified in the Standard Practice, recognized environmental conditions in connection with real property. The Phase I ESA of a portion of The Legends at Bridger Creek property (Site)consists of information about the property obtained from a records review, site reconnaissance, and interviews with knowledgeable site representatives and with one or more government officials. This Phase I ESA was performed,and this report was prepared for Edgefield,LLC(Client). This report presents the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of a portion of The Legends at Bridger Creek property located off Bridger Canyon Road, northeast of Bozeman, Montana. The ESA was conducted in June 2005, for the above Client in accordance with Higgins Consulting Engineers' ESA Proposal dated June 2005. 1.2 Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment The scope of the Phase I ESA is consistent with those outlined in the American Society for Testing and Materials' Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Phase I Environmental Assessment Process (Designation E 1527 - 00). It is beyond the scope of services for this Phase I ESA to identify concerns associated with the offsite management of solid or hazardous substances' and wastes originating from the subject property, unless these instances were discovered incidentally during the performance of this scope of work. There are no beneficiaries of this report other than the Client, and no third party is entitled to rely upon this report without the written authorization of the Client and Higgins Consulting Engineers,and a written agreement limiting Higgins Consulting Engineers' liability. The services provided by Higgins Consulting Engineers for this Phase I ESA were rendered in a manner consistent with the level of skill and care ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. Such services were also performed in conformance with the instructions of the Client as set forth in the scope of work attached to the contract between the Client and Higgins Consulting Engineers. The Phase I ESA is a technical report that may contain statements that reflect or rely on Higgins Consulting Engineers' interpretations of environmental laws, rules, regulations, or policies of federal, state,or local government. These interpretations do not constitute a legal opinion. Other than as set forth above in the Summary (regarding conformance with the scope and limitations of the referenced document of the American Society for Testing and Materials), and as contained in the foregoing paragraph regarding the standard of care employed and conformance with the scope of work and other contract documents,no representation or warranty,express or implied, is made. In preparing this report,Higgins Consulting Engineers relied on information provided by several sources, I including, but not limited to interviews with site representatives and state agencies. Where such reliance is made, the source has been identified in the text. All such sources are identified in Section 7 of this j As used in this report,the term hazardous substances include hazardous materials. • HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 1 16 June 2005 • report (References). It is beyond the scope of this project to verify the information provided by these sources. Therefore,Higgins Consulting Engineers does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the information provided by these sources or the report conclusions based on their information. 1.3 Limiting Conditions and Methodology Used It is beyond the scope of services established for this Phase I ESA to: (1) Collect or conduct laboratory analyses of environmental media,(2) assess the structural condition of above and below ground site structures,equipment,piping,or other facilities,(3) assess issues related to worker health and safety, (4) identify and delineate jurisdictional wetlands, (5) identify liabilities associated with offsite management of solid or hazardous substances or waste,(6)prepare cost estimates for the cleanup and.identification of parties potentially responsible for the cleanup of hazardous substance releases, (7) assess issues pertaining to compliance with environmental regulations, except to the extent that such regulations pertain to the status of recognized or potential environmental conditions at the subject property, or (8) assess or identify issues related to wildlife, fish and aquatic life, plant species,or their associated habitats.It is also beyond the scope of services for this.Phase I ESA to collect samples or otherwise conduct field investigatory activities to verify the presence or absence of: (a) lead- based paint, (b) asbestos-containing material (ACM), (c) lead or other contaminants in site drinking water,or(d)naturally occurring radon. No investigation is thorough enough to exclude the presence of hazardous substances at a given location. If hazardous substances or recognized environmental conditions were not identified during the Phase I ESA, such a finding should not be construed as a guarantee of the absence of such hazardous substances or recognized environmental conditions but, rather, the result of the services provided, including Higgins • Consulting Engineers' professional judgment, within the scope, limitations, and cost of the work performed. Any opinions or recommendations presented herein apply to the site conditions existing at the time the services were performed. Higgins Consulting Engineers is unable to report on or accurately predict events that may change site conditions after the described services are performed, whether those events occur naturally or are caused by external forces. Higgins Consulting Engineers assumes no responsibility for conditions the firm is not authorized to investigate or conditions not generally recognized as environmentally unacceptable when the services are performed. Higgins Consulting Engineers has not performed any surface or subsurface sampling in connection with the Phase I ESA; therefore, this report does not reach final conclusions regarding the absence, or presence, of surface or subsurface contamination. I i i i HIGGINS CONSULUNG ENGINEERS,LLC 2 16 June 2005 i • 1.4 Definitions 1. Ad'oI fining Properties: any real property or properties, the border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the property, or that would be contiguous with that of the property but for a street,road,or other public thoroughfare separating them. 2. Client: Edgefield,LLC,430 Ryman,Missoula,MT 59802. 3. Consultant: Higgins Consulting Engineers,LLC. 4. Contract: The agreement by which the Client engages the Consultant to conduct an environmental site assessment of the Property subject to the terms and conditions specified. 5. Hazardous Substance: any substance designated pursuant to Section 1321(b)(2)(A) of Title 33, any element, compound, mixture, solution, or substance designated pursuant to Section 9602 of this title, any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to Section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act(42 USC S 6921) (but not including any waste the regulation of which under the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 USC S 6901 et seq.) has been suspended by Act of Congress), any toxic pollutant listed under Section 1317(a) of Title 33, any hazardous air pollutant listed under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 USC S 7412), and any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the administrator(of EPA)has taken action pursuant to Section 2606 of Title 15. • 6. Petroleum Products: those substances included within the meaning of the terms within the petroleum exclusion to CERCLA (42 USC S 9601(14)) as interpreted by the courts and EPA. That is: petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof that is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under Subparagraphs (A) through (F) of 42 USC S 9601(14), natural gas, natural gas liquids, Iiquefied natural gas, and synthetic gas usable for fuel. The distillates of crude oil include gasoline, kerosene, diesel,jet fuel, and fuel oil, pursuant to Standard Definition of Petroleum Statistics(API,4`h Edition, 1988). 7. Proper (site): The property commonly known as The Legends at Bridger Creek, Bridger Canyon Road,Bozeman,Montana. 8. Recognized environmental condition: The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances and petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally i do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement. action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. i 9. vicini : An approximate'/4-mile radius surrounding the site. i i I� i HIGGWs CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 3 16 June 2005 i i —^----'-----•..__..............-- ......_...------'--..................'---- • 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION Higgins Consulting Engineers' Inspector performed a site reconnaissance on June 9,2005. 2.1 Location and Legal Description A partial legal description of the Site is as follows: Lots 27 and 28, Mount Baldy Subdivision and a Tract of Land Located in the N%of the S Y.,of Section 32, TIS, R6E, P.M.M. Gallatin County,Montana. The Site address is Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, Montana. The approximate location of the Site is shown in Figure 1. 2.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics The Site is located northeast of the City of Bozeman off Bridger Canyon Road. This area of Bozeman has a very diverse occupancy. Single and Multi-family residences, a golf course, an ice manufacturing facility, and farms are located in the site's vicinity. Farms,single-family homes and vacant land border the Site. The Site can be entered by turning north off Bridger Canyon Road. Figure 2 shows the Site and adjacent properties. Additional photographs of the • Site are given in Appendix A. .2.3 Descriptions of Structures,Roads,and Other Improvements to the Site The Site is unoccupied and vacant. The property encompasses 56 acres and appeared to have been planted with an alfalfa crop. Trees and shrubs were observed along the northern property boundary,along Bridger Creek. 2.4 Information Reported by User Higgins Consulting Engineers' Inspector obtained the legal description and an aerial photograph from an Aspen Partners representative. The representative stated that the ESA was ordered in conjunction with a proposed future development plan being prepared by the Client. Mr. Matt Ekstrom, the buyer's representative,was interviewed on June 17, 2005. Mr. Ekstrom said that it was his understanding that the Site had only been used for agricultural purposes throughout its history. He said that he had no knowledge of any spills or releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the Site. Mr. Ekstrom said that several groundwater wells had been constructed at the subject Site in order to determine the depth to groundwater for construction purposes. He said that during the construction of these wells, no unusual odors or visible signs of contamination in site groundwater was noted. lie HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 4 16 June 2005 • 2.5 Current Uses of the Property The Site is currently vacant and undeveloped,but is being farmed. 2.6 Past Uses of the Property Based on a review of historical information, the property has only been used for agricultural purposes in the past.In addition,a water pipeline is reported to be buried on the Site.This water line services the City of Bozeman. These uses are typically not associated with the use, storage, and dispensing of hazardous substances(i.e.,petroleum products)as defined herein. Therefore,Higgins Consulting Engineers believes there is very little potential that releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products have occurred at the Site as a result of activities associated with the historical use of the Site. 247 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties l i ` A list and description of Adjoining Properties are given below. In addition, a summary of the visual observations made by Higgins Consulting's Inspector is also given. ■ North—Bridger Creek,and further farm land.Occupants were observed to be single-family homes/farms.Hazardous substances or petroleum products were not observed on any of the above properties under conditions that indicate an existing release,a past release,or a material threat of • a release into structures on The Legends at Bridger Creek Site or into the ground,groundwater,or surface water of The Legends at Bridger Creek Site. . ■ South—Bridger Canyon Road.Occupants were observed to be single-family homes. Hazardous substances or petroleum products were not observed on this property under conditions that indicate an existing release,a past release,or a material threat of a release into structures on The Legends at Bridger Creek Site or into the ground,groundwater,or surface water of The Legends at Bridger Creek Site. ■ East—Occupants were observed to be single-family homes/farms. Hazardous substances or petroleum products were not observed on this property under conditions that indicate an existing i release,a past release,or a material threat of a release into structures on The Legends at Bridger Creek Site or into the ground,groundwater,or surface water of The Legends at Bridger Creek Site. ■ West—Vacant. Hazardous substances or petroleum products were not observed on this property under conditions that indicate an existing release,a past release,or a material threat of a release into structures on The Legends at Bridger Creek Site or into the ground,groundwater,or surface water of The Legends at Bridger Creek Site. 2.8 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions This portion of the ESA produced no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions !• affect the Site. HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 5 16 June ZOOS I r s • 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW 3.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources The standard environmental record sources reviewed are outlined below. The approximate minimum search distance(MSD)is also referenced. FEDERAL RECORDS • EPA CERCLIS List - (MSD-0.5 Mile). The February 2005 EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) inventory of potential hazardous waste sites under investigation lists no sites within %-mile of the subject site. • EPA RCRIS List - (MSD-Generators-Site and Adjoining Properties; TSDs-1.0 Mile). A review of the EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information System (RCRIS) List dated July 2004 indicates no records of hazardous waste generators for the subject property, and no adjacent properties are listed. The list also indicates that there are no Treatment, Storage, or i Disposal(TSD)facilities within 1 mile of the subject property. • EPA NPL Site List-(MSD-1.0 Mile). A review of the EPA National Priority List(NPL) Site f List dated July 2004 indicates that there was one record of a superfund sites within a 1-mile radius of the property. One(1)site was listed within the MSD from the subject site. That site is Idaho Pole Company, located on E.Cedar Street(approximately one mile south of the subject Site). The Idaho Pole Company began treating wood products with creosote in 1946 at their 50-acre site. In 1952,the company switched to pentachlorophenol(PCP) in the treating process.The facility closed in 1997. Ground water in the area is shallow and flows north to northwest,discharging into Rocky Creek. The State found quantities of PCP in a tributary of Rocky Creek in 1978.Installation of a ground water treatment system and interceptor trench has successfully reduced the migration of wastes 1 through the ground water at the Idaho Pole Company site. Contaminated soils have been removed from contact with ground water and have been biologically treated. The contaminated groundwater plume's northern boundary is located approximately'/Z mile south of the subject ' property.Higgins Consulting Engineers does not believe the Idaho Pole site will be an environmental concern to the Site,based on the information obtained from the State regarding remedial action taken. It also does not appear that the ground water plume has migrated significantly since remedial action has been taken at Idaho Pole. i • Federal Emergency Response Notification System List(MSD-Site). The June 2005 Federal j Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) List indicates no reports for the subject property. • 14IGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 6 16 June 2005 t ! . STATE RECORDS • MDEQ Underground Storage Tank(UST)List-(MSD-Site and Adjoining Properties). The May 2005 MDEQ-UST list indicates that underground storage tanks are not currently registered under the name of the subject site or for the site address. No tanks are listed for any adjoining properties. • MDEQ Leaking Underground Storage Tank(LUST)List-(MSD-0.5 Mile). A review of the MDEQ-LUST List dated May 2005 indicates that no LUSTS were reported for the subject property or for any adjoining facilities. One LUST site was listed within the MSD from the subject Site, the Bozeman City Landfill, located one-half mile north of the site. The Landfill site is not an active LUST site and has been issued a"No Further Action"letter by the MDEQ. • Montana CECRA List (MSD-0.5 Mile). The February 2005 Montana Comprehensive Environmental Clean-up and Responsibility (CECRA) list of non-NPL sites currently under investigation reports two sites within a %-mile radius of the subject site. Those sites are the Mercer Post Plant, located at 2001 N. Rouse (approximately one mile southwest of the Site)nand the Bozeman Old City Landfill, located approximately one-half mile southwest of the Site,north of Griffin Drive. Specific information regarding these sites was not readily available, however, both sites have a "Low" priority ranking from the MDEQ. Higgins Consulting does not believe either site would be an environmental concern to the subject property, because groundwater flow in the area of the Mercer Post Plant and the Bozeman Old City landfill appears to be ! west/southwest, or away from the Site, based on information obtained from one of the Gallatin County Sanitarians(Moore 2005). I • • Montana Pollution Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) Records (MSD-Site). The July 2004 Montana Pollution Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) permit records show that there has not been a discharge permit issued for the subject property. LOCAL RECORDS • Gallatin City-County Health Department (GCCHD) Listings. According to Tom Moore, Environmental Health Specialist with the GCCHD, the Site is not currently connected to municipal services, but hey will be available. He also stated that he knew of no groundwater impacts in the general Site area. The Montana Occupation and Radiation Health Bureau (MORHB) has completed a statewide investigation of indoor radon exposures (State/EPA Residential Radon Survey-SRRS) 'and has issued a summary of the results. Montana,taken as a whole,was listed as having the fifth highest radon level of 4 pico Curies per liter. This result is based on a two to seven day sampling period. Based on the information obtained from the SRRS summary, Higgins Consulting Engineers recommends that the building at the subject property be tested in order to determine site-specific radon concentrations • Montana State Solid Waste Disposal Site Listing-(MSD-0.5 Mile). A review of the Montana State Solid Waste Disposal Site Listing indicates that two state regulated landfills exist within ''/Z- mile of the subject property. Those sites are the Bozeman City Landfill and the Bozeman Old I HIGGINI CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 7 16 June 2005 • City Landfill (closed). The Bozeman City Landfill is located approximately one-half mile north of the site, off Story Mill Road and the Bozeman Old City Landfill was located approximately one-half mile southwest of the Site, north of Griffin Drive. Higgins Consulting does not believe either of these sites will affect the subject property since they are either down gradient or cross gradient of the Site, based on the information obtained from one of the Gallatin County Sgnitarians(Moore 2005). 3.2 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions This portion of the ESA produced no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions affect the Site. • I ` i i 1 • HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 8 16 June 2005 • 4.0 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES 4.1 Review of Topographic Maps The U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute Bozeman, MT quadrangle was reviewed to provide information about the topography of the site and previous development of the site and vicinity. A review of the above-referenced map indicates that the site is situated in rural area northwest of Bozeman and at an elevation of 4730' above Mean Sea Level(MSL). Area topography indicates that the Site is on relatively flat terrain. Surface water would infiltrate the surface soils at the site. It appears that the general topographical slope is to the west in this area of the map. The map does not show any significant structures east of the Site (i.e., at an elevation higher than the subject Site), which might be considered to be facilities that might use, store, dispose or otherwise handle hazardous substances. Therefore, it does not appear that the Site is at risk of being contaminated by surface spills of such substances from major off-site sources. One waterway appears on the map. Bridger Creek forms the northern boundary of the Site. The map indicates that there are no major structures on the Site. 4.2 Site Geology • A Soils Study was conducted in June 2004 at an adjacent property west of the Site. The results of the soils study indicated that most of the Site area is comprised of silty or clayey sandy loam in the upper 2- 2.5 feet of soil horizon. Below these soils, to a depth of approximately 5 feet, the soils become gravelly loam or sandy loam. Closer to Bridger Creek, soils tend to become more cobbly. In general,these soils would tend to be very transmissive, and would be well-drained. Due to the fact that the silty clayey loamy soils are not particularly thick,these soils would not tend to swell to significant degree. The soils at the subject Site are either mapped as Sudworth-Nesda Loams, 0-2% Slopes, or Bandy- Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex, 0-2% Slopes. More complete soils information may be found in Appendix K of the Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application for the Legends I at Bridger Creek (Studio Architects 2004). 4.3 Regional Groundwater Quality and Occurrence According to Tom Moore, Gallatin County sanitarian, the groundwater flow direction in the vicinity of the Site is towards the west. Additional information from Mr. Moore suggested that groundwater flow north of Bridger Creek is generally toward the southwest,and that groundwater flow in the vicinity of the Idaho Pole Superfund Site is generally toward the north-northwest. Groundwater monitoring wells were constructed in conjunction with the Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application. Data in the Preliminary Plat Application suggests that the depth to groundwater at the Site ranges between approximately 5' below ground surface to approximately 8' below ground surface. Groundwater flow modeling, in conjunction with the Preliminary Plat Application for the Legends I I I ': . HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 9 16 June 2005 I 1 1.......................... .. --.........................----- -.....-.._.__. _._.. -----... -._.... --- -._........_................._---:._- -- - Subdivision suggests that the general direction of groundwater flow is west-southwest near Bridger Creek and toward the west elsewhere on the Site. 4.4 Aerial Photo Review Historical aerial photographs of the Site were not readily available. 4.5 Historical Maps Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps were reviewed for information pertaining to the historical uses of the Site and the possible presence of USTs,ASTs or other indicators of the storage of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products at the Site and properties adjacent to the Site. No Sanborn Maps were available for the subject Site's area. 4.6 Ownership/Occupancy Information Ownership information from the Hallie Rugheimer was gathered during this site assessment. Owriershi Year s Rugheimer Family 1971 to Present Carl Vogel Family Unknown to 1971 Based on the names listed for property ownership and historical interviews, the Site has only been used for agricultural uses in the past. 4.7 Permit Review According to records on file at Gallatin County, the Site is not currently connected to any municipal services. However,a water pipeline,serving the City of Bozeman,is buried onsite. 4.8 Zoning The subject site is zoned"AS-Agricultural Suburban District"at the present time. The current use of the site is consistent with this designation. 4.9 Contact with Current On-Site Tenant/Owner Ms. Hallie Rugheimer, current property owner, was interviewed on June 9, 2005. Ms. Rugheimer stated that the property has been in her family for over 35 years. She said that there have never been any buildings, wells or drain fields on the Site. Ms. Rugheimer stated that, to her knowledge, no storage of hazardous materials or dumping has occurred at the Site and no USTs were ever located there. She said that the rip-rap vehicle bodies observed along Bridger Creek were placed there long before her family purchased the Site;probably in the 1950's,or earlier. • HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 10 16 June 2005 Ms. Rugheimer said that a buried water pipeline exists at the Site. She said the pipeline has been used to provide the City of Bozeman water since the late 1890's. 4.10 Othet Interviews Mr. Tom Moore, Gallatin County Sanitarian was interviewed on June 10,2005. Mr.Moore confirmed that the Idaho Pole Company has a contaminated groundwater plume that is currently stationary.He confirmed that the groundwater in the vicinity of the Idaho Pole Company is shallow and is moving north/northwest towards Rocky Creek He said he does not believe the plume will migrate further,since the sources have been removed from the site. Mr.Moore also said that the general groundwater flow direction in the Site's vicinity is towards the west. Mr. Tim Stepp,MDEQ Landfill Engineer,was interviewed on June 14,2004.Mr. Stepp confirmed the locations of the old and current City of Bozeman Landfills' locations. He also stated that there is confirmed groundwater contamination relating to the current Landfill,however,Higgins Consulting does not believe groundwater contamination should be an environmental concern because the landfill is not upgradient from the subject Site. 4.11 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions This portion of the ESA produced no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions affect the Site. • I I • HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 11 16 June 2005 5.0 INFORMATION DERIVED FROM SITE RECONNAISSANCE AND INTERVIEWS 5.1 Hazardous Substances in Connection with Identified Uses Hazardous substances and/or petroleum products, as defined in Section 1.6, were not observed during the Site reconnaissance on June 9, 2005. 5.2 Unidentified Substance Containers Unidentified substance containers were not observed during the site reconnaissance on June 9,2005. 5.3 Storage Tanks Storage tanks or evidence of storage tanks were not observed during the site reconnaissance on June 9, 2005. 5.4 Indications of Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs) Indications of PCBs on or near the subject Site were not observed during the site reconnaissance on June 9,2005. • 5.5 Indications of Asbestos Containing Materials(ACMs) Potential ACMs were not observed during the site reconnaissance on June 9,2005. 5.6 Indications of Solid Waste Disposal Vehicle bodies were observed along the banks of Bridger Creek during the site reconnaissance on June 9, 2005. According to the current owner of the Site,Hallie Rugheimer,the vehicles were placed there in the 1950's or earlier. Because the vehicles were placed prior to 1964; therefore, they are not required to be i removed under current State law, according to Darrell Stankey, of the MDEQ Motor Vehicle Recycling Program. If the vehicles are removed in the future,Mr. Stankey stated that permits must be obtained from the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation and the Montana State Fish Wildlife and Parks. 5.7 Physical Setting Analysis The hydrogeologic characteristics reported for the Site and vicinity suggests that the approximate depth to groundwater beneath the Site is between 5 and 8 feet below ground surface. Groundwater is believed to generally flow west in this area of Bozeman, but may flow west-southwest near Bridger Creek. Groundwater at the Site and in the immediately surrounding area does not appear to be significantly impacted by hazardous substances or petroleum products based on a review of GCHD files. i i i • HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERs,LLC 12 16 June 2005 5.8 Other Conditions of Concern During the site reconnaissance on June 9, 2005 and on January 12, 2005, the Higgins Consulting Inspector did not observe any of the following indicators of potential hazardous substance releases: • stained soil • stressed vegetation • generation of wastewater and potential releases • stained pavement • pits,ponds,or lagoons • floor drains • storm drains 5.9 Analysis of Impact on Recognized Environmental Conditions This portion of the ESA produced no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions affect the Site. i i i i HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 13 16 June 2005 i i 6.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Higgins Consulting Engineers performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Site located off Bridger Canyon Road, in Bozeman, Montana. Higgins Consulting Engineers endeavored to perform this Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E-1527 with exceptions to and deletions from the above-referenced standard described in the Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment(See Section 1.3)of this report and the Phase I ESA proposal. This ESA produced no evidence suggesting that recognized environmental conditions affect the Site. I .. i } i IJIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LL.0 14 16 June 2005 • 7.0 REFERENCES American Society For Testing And Materials, 2000. Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. ASTM Standard E 1527-00. Personal Correspondence,June 2005. Personal Communication between Mr.Tim Stepp,MDEQ Personal Correspondence,June 2005. Personal Communication between Mr.Matt Ekstrom,The Legends at Bridger Creek Representative. Personal Correspondence, June 2005. Personal Communication between Mrs. Hallie Rugheimer, Current Site Owner Personal Correspondence, June 2005. Personal Communication between Mr. Tom Moore, Gallatin County Sanitarian i 1 I i i 't i I HIGGINS CONSULTING ENGINEERS,LLC 15 16 June 2005 • FIGURES ...................... ............... .......................................... �.�1 • ;•F �Jh.`l J� s�sr.. f 1 j1. 7�t a Y� a 1 �' �. �• •' •' ' � ,.�,sue;" �'-• _ Y 1 11I unuh �•i Inuunu) ■■w■�-�' rju unuu� 011f� fi ,. un•ncu��aH.« "oilgp A 1 AM �•�•`•`1i11ii1i.:='umu11■■/r•ejll Y ., E r • s t i r.) r r ..y 11n1i1711nn7■p1111 ' u nntlli:.'nnr-'Uun unnummnzluur unnusnnneruu�.. unnunnunoluu?• �I 1 :1 1 ' s =�r unnunnun■cs+uMose 1 :: uuuetunnit The Legends at Br••c ■ Bridger CanyonRoad Bozeman, • • 11:9 Date: • 11 • APPENDIX SITE RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHS ............ ................ Zr tip!, •? �°:�+�i.r�Jlf�,-i,Jliri<�'a'��`'�,4?S�-t`',4?"' '�\':jSy' '�: A'r Yr�.^,ii.J �1/r .'•9,d'-+:'i L r 31 5 t x :c . .....~,d`•� -,;,_�-. .may,. 911.16*1111-111.wq its I AppErm><x B SCOPE OF SERVICE The scope of service is consistent with that outlined in ASTM Standard E 1527. The specific services provided are outlined below. • Performed an on-site reconnaissance to identify indicators (as defined in later sections) of the existence of recognized environmental conditions. • While being located in public thoroughfares, looked at adjacent properties or properties in the vicinity in an attempt to see if any occupied facilities or structures are operated by entities that are likely to use, store, generate,or dispose of hazardous substances. • Reviewed the following sources to obtain information about the potential for hazardous substances to exist at the site or at properties located in the vicinity (unless noted otherwise)of the site: - Montana Department of Environmental Quality Petroleum Release Section Files - Montana Department of Environmental Quality CECRA Program Files - Gallatin County Health Department Files • Reviewed the following references for information pertaining to the documented occurrence and quality of groundwater in the vicinity of the site: - See Section 7.0 i - City of Missoula • Reviewed the following maps to obtain information about the site's topography and previous development and uses of the site and properties adjacent to and in the vicinity of the site: => 1964 USGS Bozeman Quadrangle • Interviewed the following individuals: =- Mr.Tim Stepp,MDEQ,June 2005 => Mrs.Hallie Rugheimer,Current Owner,June 2005 => Mr.Tom Moore,Gallatin County Sanitarian,June 2005 => Mr.Matt Ekstrom,The Legends at Bridger Creek Rrepresentative,June 2005 I • f I � ' � D a • Soils 4 4�, y r � Jl� f i •� ;ryi Project Boundary 17A r 407A 407A FA R r � ' '�'��--j •B '�` te,S.< ,�-�r �{, . 'J. •'!`'�"t* , 1.44 ) L-L - '•-1 CJ�Y?� �''� C��{�11� ' ;'art' �1 S "off BRIDGER CANYON DR. ' 4P, Legend:(SSURGO Soils OData) 407A-Sudworth-Nesda Loams,0-2%Slopes 606A-Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex,0.2%Slopes 500 GRAPHIC 0 SCALE 500 r9[MAIERLE,INC. ORRISON The Legends at An CfnyWyM-Wm.G 0—my y Bridger Creek II ( IN FEET ) 1O 00 111&901 T.a.m,D a4&�W.W"I.Rvc(00 W-on1 F=(4%)07-1176 1 inch = 500 ft. CLIENT: Soils Map FIELD WORK DATE:5/04/05 PLOTTED DATE: May/04/2005 - 01:47:45 pm DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:1"=500' DRAWING NAME: H:\3959\002\ACAD\EXHIBDS\WETIAND.dwg CHECKED BY:SR pROJ #;395.002 SHEET 1 OF 1 Engineering Properties Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number-- Depth USDA texture Liquid Plasticity Map symbol De p >10 3-10 limit index and soil name Unified AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct 407A: • .... .... .,..,...,-. _ .. . .. ,. _.<..,........ ..•;.., �..,-,-..:: :.: :.ems-=. a;;�.,. :,�,,,.. ,t�: •fir-. ...a* .R, ,1i2 ::;4: •�7. r- fir° .s�3.s �{w $ f..:Y.'.: a -M',}r. •,,:.a�d;M+a' e ..•. -::... ,._...:,r e� �.,, {s 60 85 ;+ 25 30 a �. CLML' 9.01'00 85.1 . e i „�y w*Am 4.r .... ° ,. t re:". '• .. `I".c �.i. w, ;'.:'. .; c ,5 X r:_ 'tlY,c4•. .t: :, : : /'r$Y .,6:.. 'f` .rA ak:<.;.:.•., ;taxY.r� u. ar r.,m,.s'i; �.:2�a5 p.. 90 i00 90 100 c e:65 95.,I 85., y 25 35 ."A.- 5 1(Qa: . �24 29Q �C.lSY am.Loam,Slltioam ,JCL MLA iM, A 4r: f 0 y .� r<,:ar,. :� Fr s � �. � z. ..t l.p r..Ti.�L',.•. 'P. h}�y;>�'�! .+:�•" � a'e�:. 4�'�''.6"a•'�1Rr... •*l, t`..; �'c�, ,ra'`...z�: "?i��::;�`+ ?.. •'""'�"b' ,;,a^. �:'... ::r ±�",'',-.��; ' t- ut-emel. cobbl`;I. am GP-GMT �.; A-1a E w 5 ,t 0 14 r r Shp NP Y; �, 55 � � ����� E.TMi's;�•�z 0 � �v1�"5 �x, ,�� uN4y ' yr Yrynk+ w �,e xt.: r .5 y, N�. . sand;Very gr�vellyoarny SP SM �"^+ 4r� a e gr� �R 4 � t-sa9ggExtremelygravelly NOU ' , :.e ..�:s. u�'Il.. �,">"'�T�"'. i r Y -�` ., >•:i: '�1u3 F S?,n�C�eTi:e.;5.,. .m., �r. Y«at y Cz 4... . Nesda 0-11 Loam ML. A-4 0 0-5 90-100 85-100 65-95 35-75 15-25 NP-5 SM 11-60 Very gravelly loamy sand, GM, A-1. 0 0-25 25-60 15-50 5-40 0-20 --- NP Very gravelly sand, GP, Extremely gravelly sand GP-GM, SP-SM This report shows only the major soils In each map unit.Others may exist. USDA Natural Resources Tabular Data Version:2 = Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date:10/06/2004 Page 1 of 1 Physical Soil Properties Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors--T"apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Saturated Available Linear Map symbol Moist bulk water a Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay density hydraulic ility b conductivity capacity ility matter bility bility Kw Kf T group index In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct 407A: t q ,,.'r a . :i' 'V.f. r l �ti�.yrr�:k771' r..,�,.,•.:YrT„�y �a;Y �k�...� }b _xi E �•k�..,,.; ,GY'.�a„t. •r �, 'cM"°y® nv)".;. 1^.4'� Sud.worth,,..,. ; 4t �s.r �,:,�t;,, O,y24 ,��'` �tp�•_ . �; ,��.18.27 1�:20 t1 30 4�00`�`-°,t'14 00. 0 18 0 22 •0`0`2 9�^r 2 0' 5�.0= 37: ,.3:7� 3 ' • 6 48' t�Y,:'�i�y rr. .j�,apt+��-.'t ,,�o-1P; ;J,r.�i. ',-Ott_.,. .�•,:u�•apg h% .*ty� � x.,. :. ^�3•._ .yr l_' f, - '�. :�.. .Ni'+' «,� "> ._ � , „i ;� 1' F:. � as .2.24',29 .f 'v.:,-- 18=27 1.20 1.40 n4�00 14..00 �0. ,8-0.22 •,r�0.0-2:9- 3:0 3r0 ,.37 :37 ...c a� �+yr: �t>;,�., t it.�sl'hY. H tP�. e,i''t,Tri �x ?y�,! - ���Et,,r. ,5�:>e •fir, _,E, v�: rt p .> �;y " i�_`"" �: '.5�,',�4d`�`�¢�'q^ .4.,lC -y ,.p�t -.rm.Krl -s. ,W� �i ..1' n,'7"{ r�3P': ti^Ti. "Q'%.tt. •�!'"" ;i .S .•� fi ,�` .�; 4 �.. ,• ":'�29=60 �.r p�;__ .:� �' � r.. 2=7,�• •1:60 '��;_,42:00-1 1}.0. 0:03-.0.04' .0-2:9 0 0.0� .20 *�' �^.; R.;;, .��>t+;* ,,,� .. .. . t,M F•,r,<:�: :.�:.,�as t�: :�����'t``' ],-�;ty` �, qr^ � 5y'ryy .� 4� 0 0 .. 5 .©5. �}:.m,�-. � +.:�'z.,�*.:!ro ,h�;rr�'J ��f�r'.Fl: .. v!.0 .m i� hfi�'.xr.`5234.r�T�ta/ice,rh.:a7t?'.f%15�::.'3msa'a3aN�:',�n,.{:S4'7A.;r,:. `a:r.is,y:aeak �i. �i:• '.1r^�G�'atYeyn+. +m ..c i., r. a Nesda 0-11 --- 10-20 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.14-0.18 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .37 .37 2 5 56 11-60 --- --- 0-10 1.55-1.70 42.00-141.00 0.03-0.04 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .02 .10 U(S,(D/� This report shows only the major soils in each map unit.Others may exist. J LJl`1 Natural.Resources Tabular Data Version:2 Conservation'Service Tabular Data Version Date:10/06/2004 Page 1 of 1 Dwellings and.Small Commercial Buildings Gallatin County Area,Montana [The information in this table indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation. The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Pct. Dwellings without basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Map symbol of and soil name map unit Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating class and Value limiting features limiting features limiting features 407A: Lwo h 60: Very�limited F Uery meted � � +' Uery�Umlt d i_ Flooding 1': Floodlny c 1 Flbodmg 1 . Nesda 25 Very limited Very limited Very limited Flooding 1 Flooding 1 Flooding 1 This report shows only the major soils in each map unit.Others may exist- USDA Natural Resources Tabular Data Version:2 _ Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date:10/06/2004 Page 1 of 1 ® Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping Gallatin County Area,Montana l [The information in this table indicates the dominant'soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation.The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value,the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Pct. Local roads and streets Shallow excavations Lawns and landscaping Map symbol of and soil name map unit Rating class and Rating class and Rating class and limiting features Value limiting features Value limiting features Value 407A: A r Sudworth p +4 li 6.0 Somaa gist dwhmttecl 'FFost action ..�0 5 Cufbanks cane 1 Content of large 0 0/I Nesda 25 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Flooding 0.4 Cutbanks cave 1 Droughty 0.57 • USDAThis report shows only the major soils in each map unit.Others may exist. 1Vatural Resources Tabular Data Version:2 Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date:10/06/2004 Page 1 of 1 Soil Features Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern or that data were not estimated] Restrictive layer Subsidence Potential Risk of corrosion Map symbol and soil name Kind Depth to for frost Thickness Hardness Initial Total action Uncoated ac Concrete top steel In In In In 407A: w.�.. 5-y�. ;x -..� x,u 4 i ,•�t yF ::;.:V:.a,f�Cw;�..a.a ..c:�4 ,*?n x :^r.0�;,Y9A";;arki9r�n� ^�l?nyFt�x�ti. 'ava' k',9"?�Gpe?a79�'. "t'�v!�:`t9.+x�p;wsr� '>'ti '�.-Al $U61V✓Orth �r 1 f: whro ts5 O�ap % Moderate Hl l� ?SCOW.'~ . ,. _ _ �.....d..,r::.��..'ta.,.�.. ..,. ..,:.r r.z+n_�?,• !__ .. t.... .,.:i.._.:�d•7,,t .nF ,Ra 0, }ar .4 ;9YLW7t ?ic ih.^.�.^z Nesda 0 --- Low High Low a USDANatural.Resources This report shows only the major soils in each map unit.Others may exist. Tabular Data Version:2 Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date:10/06/2004 Page l'of 1 Engineering-Properties Gallatin County Area,Montana (Absenco of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number-- Map symbol Depth USDA texture Liquid Plasticity and soil name >10 3-10 limit index Unified AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 In Pct Pct Pct 606A: Y-..,..0 •5', ,�':-... It'u"'cortSr;!a'1�.-R. .r'^. 19 "d'eN7a. .J.+1t,• :�. ..., ...., ...yri?2+;5O 4\. F1.� ,- t. �.5 JY ,ix7ii rr� �.N t` Y N_. `5 jw'A�ti (;'':�_et ffi *!:^✓![l.Sxx�y'-9?' `.u.}K,,!v- iIY C✓,¢C:'rs fil. A.T. '4r '.a+1C :Band tc. <� 0.8 �i�Loam � � � ` b, C � Y k r J ujg t r a 1 usa Y .e..a- , h {.,,.,, _ � 8;17 � Cobbly,sartdy Ioamr Gravelly,: CL MLA A�2 4w pSangdyloarn �CSM�yA. ni :m•;f, .. n. ',:-•'W"nGa "d�,f 4. 4'`�'i^iF' r �"; 3``l" '''' .�r'fl;-'' 4 , _•,� ''y 4 Y .. _ _ v 1 �1.r7 60 -V.e-ry cobbly,lomy sndy GM �� •A 1 �a a ai �'. 0 1Q 3Q, 35.65 25 55 1;5=40 5=.15 k' 20 25. NP'-5. GMa� y V SP=S�IVI������.` `. rf� sc � coarsesand .rry Riverwash - ;:�• ;;aw;�t^ ;s ;j�v;?;'w'' ''ri�+ns§v'�' t4ti?" r. ';sg',z'4�'S asX�;: om' � am �• , pT j a-� -��� p'<; 0'�.. ,'! �`tj �-0,' :0 '0 `� --- -�; t�`�.� i 1'i I .:}l� ��,i,t�irg/�.• 6x r_ 'l,��a"'Nt y '��, ,i !, 4 '� Y -. 1�1 i+i �' t x , CLML A=4 " 0, 0 95=110`,0 90 100 I 75'-95 557 25 30 �5 1Os 4-15 Lo 11" - -,t'u... � `ti '•' ��� ,a � a ' J,'.�,�„ �"'ni���� .' 1.'5{,25� St atlfiesandy loamy o-sll'� , :CL,� ,A2-,a 0: � w�r Ox, ,95�"100 5 90•1�O;Q 60- 0 , 30�7s0 25 5 5=1�5`�' oaul m' ::� y '4 ;'r�'�ac�� 1t�',y<„l��it'�X4y"+�,� •4:�, ^.;�, . SC_S � it �.� �,,�„ '6+' :.�. i.. , .�, ;. N ?�. .�'� = � ,f`.' �r ` 'r"k,,� ?.,'w,,b`:'� 25¢60i3'�Ve�`cotitil39loem coarse :GM r� A1• -r'-m',0; 10-45- y 25-60, - t t Y� �-•• �' e rn el Ezto �.. GF=.GM � "�' �r• 20�55; �0 40 ,` 5-15 =20 25. '- Y NP 5�` a ' o yc bl �,•4,�p�r� I�oamya�nd� 'erygrauelly-' ' • ' ,. .?s -,.,'�'�t `"0`,�CfSw'K{' Yte coa sesand � maDiz,..,, rv. .;�� ,�wr ;+- �15�? �� USDA This report shows only the major soils in each map unit.Others may exist. �, Natural.R-sources Tabular Data version:2 Conservation Serviee Tabular Data version Daie:.10l06/2004 Page 1 of 1 Physical Soil Properties Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Facturs--T'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist bulk Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay density hydraulic water ' e ty bili matter bility bility- conductivity capacity bility Kw Kf T group index In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec. In/In Pct Pct 606A: r4 t;,;^R° ;N,� •rti,'- '�'•'. ,y..,�,�... ,K ,.ea«m TMknn,<pveo.-.ij' '•":,•y.,"•;,."R..,.'N.'^: ,,3•F n•7.,Y. �,.:..a.;v'9;.Mtn,.Y.,t4 ''',Q,..:.,z .y,r'Y.d,rygefi :;. .'r. •;,i:.•' $arid G 0 8: , ,•rzr r-- <- b-25t= air-?c1::Y5,11'25'�4 ��g4:00=1;4:00 � r 0�15=0:1,8,�. .OeO 2:9' 4.0 6�Q 28 28 S�,v2�4'?e � 6� < ],•48 :Y. 3:` i�E Ra' �, lw .t; �?s, ,i,..;.. rs:° - ,•s ;, ,r ' t , .w,m. '* 1'2. 1 55 t� 4 00'42.00 OA09=. 11j •-+ r� ���'�_, ��.>•' 0 •0.0 2:9,'_ 1�0�`=3'.0 4 3�• :s r g,�" .w�'-�'. r,xe >5 +;ask vt`�a?• ,,yitistt rY Y•tN ,k;(.t 'k,":g.aye 7 '^ t fit' L ;n +� g �.ry' s 1+7 60 rz 2``1:0- 1..45:1:6.5. 42.00-.1431.00 , 0 01.0.03 0:0 2.9 0 5 1..0 .05 20. z, —:Y.Y%M`>4.a..kw4". f..n S.M�A::�T-�I.a����,?."�+.�a�i9v.+'� 4si� ,.:Y.dSctc�..` �e Ai W'u:. If�u. Y 4 .� !• Riverwash --- --- --- --- --- --- �, }.�. .,�� �.'`r- 0�•:�.. kY�-,.�x`r,�.�' 9:0 42�-.`00 .,� .. � 40 95' --- --- 3 ' ..,g z:."�x ,r•4m8� ��`�',t` tip,1151 ' S;�� 7�� � 1! �.310 �f 4_00=1,4c00a 0.1'8 Ot22 "t0 2:9. 4.0'8c0 28' 28' r i • • ' r ',�-' 1,5 25."�;n,�,.� , ���,q' � ��3 tr25 1 45 '�.���`�y4�00=1[4,.,OQ: O'17�,0.20 •3,.0 5.9 2-�0=4.0 `.28: .28 �y 2 rr A3t4rt1 S ''4nrkt',�'`sT ', SI� ••,• •i. .; �,�...�. , y, ,,25 60 F Ee r�� - l 0�0 �„1;.50���70�."•}.�.42.00,1451:00 0 04-0.06 y Q�0 2.9 1.0 2-0 :05 .17 ,;• L . y,,-{,. ;� lthis report shows only the major soils In each map unit.Others may exist. S'C�A 1Vatural Resources Tabular Data Version:2 Conservation 5erV1Ce Tabular Data Version Date:10/06/2004 page 1 of 1 SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB M 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PITM 7 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES A 0"-16" 2.5 YR 2.5/1 silty clay loam granular yes no smooth 16"-60" 5 YR 2.5/2 loam fine yes yes numerous mottles 60"-97" 10 YR 3/3 loamy sand no no rock to 12"+/-40% Seasonal Groundwater present? Q Depth: Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. i • • SOIL PROFILE LOG MORR/SON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB M 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PITM 8 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES A 0"-14" 2.5 YR 2.5/2 loamy sand, gritty yes no 14"-43" 2.5 YR 2.5/2 sandy loam yes small cobble 50% 43"-96" 2.5 YR 2.5/2 sandy loam no large cobble to 12" -50% cobble 96"-97" 7.5 YR 4/4 sandy loam no larger cobble to 12"-50% cobble, very wet Seasonal Groundwater present? Q Depth: Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: • Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORR/SON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB M 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PITM 9 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES A 0"-8" 2.5 YR 2.5/1 silty clay loam yes no 8"-32" 5 YR 2.5/2 loam yes yes numerous mottles 32"-80" 10 YR 2/3 loamy sand no no damp cobble rock 50% 80"-96" 10 YR 2/3 sand no water @ 95"cobble rock to 12 50/a Seasonal Groundwater present? Q Depth: Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%)? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. • • • SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MA/ERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PIT#: 10 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES • A 0"-27" 2.5 YR 2.5/1 silty clay loam granular yes no 27"-45" 5 YR 2.5/2 loam yes yes 45"-86" 10 YR 3/3 loamy sand no no many mottles 86"-96" 10 YR 2/3 sand no no cobble to 6" 10% Seasonal Groundwater present? Q Depth: Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: . Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PIT#: 11 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES A 0"-25" 2.5 YR 2.5/1 silty clay loam granular yes no 25-55" 5 YR 2.5/2 silty clay loam granular yes yes many mottles 55"-96" 10 YR 3/3 loamy sand no no cobble rock 40%to 12" Seasonal Groundwater present? Q Depth: Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PIT#: 12 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES A 0"-19" 2.5 YR 2.5/1 silty clay loam granular yes no 19"-45" 2.5 YR 2.5/2 sandy loam yes 45"-51" 2.5 YR 2.5/2 sandy loam no many mottles cobble rock 40% B9 51"-60" color chart 2 grey 5/5PB loamy sand no cobble rock 40%to 8" 69 60"-96" color chart 2 grey 5/5PB sand granular no cobble rock 40%to 12" Seasonal Groundwater present? Depth: 51" Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: • Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: MRS DATE: 5/4/2004 TEST PIT#: 13 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES • A 0"-15" 2.5 YR 2.5/1 silty clay loam granular yes no 15"-30" 10 YR 2/3 sand yes no small cobble 50% 30"-96" 10 YR 2/3 sand no no very wet small cobble 50% Seasonal Groundwater present? Depth: 56" Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: • Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? Q MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0711 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: WDF DATE: 5/6/2004 TEST PITM 14 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES • A 0"-57" 10 YR 3/2 silty-very fine very fine granular yes no sandy clay loam B 57"-96" 10 YR 4/2 sandy clay loam very fine granular no yes gravel @ 57" Seasonal Groundwater present? No Depth: 96" Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? No MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORR/SON-MA/ERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB M 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: WDF DATE: 5/6/2004 TEST PITM 15 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES silty clay loam- A 0"-53" 10 YR 3/2 very fine sandy very fine granular yes no 2"ribbons clay loam B 53"-96" 10 YR 4/2 sandy clay loam very fine granular no no gravel @ 53" 40%+/-6" (-)material Seasonal Groundwater present? INo Depth: >96" Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: • Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? INo MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MA/ERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: WDF DATE: 5/6/2004 TEST PIT#: 16 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES A 0"-39" 10 YR 3/2 silty-very fine very fine granular yes yes sandy clay loam B 39"-96" 10 YR 4/2 sandy clay loam very fine granular yes yes gravel +/-30% 6" (-)material Seasonal Groundwater present? lNo Depth: >96" Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: • Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? lNo MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. old wood water line @ 5' (T.O.P.) 7' +/-east of M.W. SOIL PROFILE LOG MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. BACKHOE TEST PIT 901 Technology Blvd. JOB#: 3658.002 Bozeman,MT 59715 PROJECT: Aspen Partners (406)587-0721 LOCATION: Off Bridger Canyon Road EVAL. BY: WDF DATE: 5/6/2004 TEST PIT#: 17 HORIZON DEPTH COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE ROOTS MOTTLING NOTES • A 0"-52" 10 YR 3/2 silty-very fine very fine granular yes no sandy clay loam B 52"-96" 10 YR 4/2 sandy clay loam very fine granular no yes gravel @ 52" Seasonal Groundwater present? lNo Depth: >96" Est. Depth to Limiting Layer or Bedrock: Approx. Distance to Neighboring wells: Approx. Distance to Neighboring Absorption Fields: • Approx. Distance to Nearby Open Water/Stream: Slope in excess of 4:1 (25%) ? INo MORRISON-MAIERLE,INC. E • Wetlands " DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTRICT HELENA REGULATORY OFFICE 10 WEST 16..STREET,SUITE 2200 R E C @=?. REPLY TO HELENA MT 59626 ' ATTENTION OF October 21, 2005 �d Helena Regulatory Office Phone (406) 441-1375 Fax (406) 441-13 80 RE: Corps File No. 2005-90-761 Corps File No. 2005-90-820 Edgefield LLC Morrison Maierle, Inc. Attn: Paul W. McGuire P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771 Dear Mr. McGuire: We have reviewed the information you submitted on behalf of your client to construct a subdivision on property located in Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East, Gallatin County, Montana. • Under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Department of the Army permits are required for the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States. Waters of the U. S. include the area below the ordinary high water mark of stream channels and lakes or ponds connected to the tributary system, and wetlands adjacent to these waters. Isolated waters and wetlands, as well as man-made channels and ditches, may be waters of the U. S. in certain circumstances, which must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Based on the information you initially provided, and a subsequent site visit by the Corps on October 13; 2005, the site contains both jurisdictional waters of the U. S. under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and a non jurisdictional wetland. The enclosed Jurisdictional Determination (JD) forms describe the extent of waters of the United States on the project site. These are Approved Jurisdictional Determinations, and they are valid for a period of 5 years from the date of this letter unless new information warrants revision of the determination before the expiration date. If you disagree with these jurisdictional determinations, you have the right to appeal the decision. If you would like more information on the jurisdictional appeal process, contact this office. Corp File No. 2005-90-761. Isolated wetland (Wetland W-2-05) is not jurisdictional. Corp File No. 2005-90-820. Bridger Creek and its adjacent wetlands (Wetland W-3-05) are jurisdictional. Printed on®Recycled Paper 2 Please be advised that if any fill material is to be placed either temporarily or permanently in a water of the United States, a Department of the Army permit is required for this project. You may also be required to obtain other applicable federal, state,tribal and local permits. If you have any questions, please call Vicki Sullivan of this office at (406) 441-1375. Any and all future submittals and inquiries must reference Corps File No's. 2005-90-761 and 2005-90-820. Sincerely, O Allan Steinle Montana Program Manager Enclosures JD Forms • • • JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Revised 8/13/04 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers • DISTRICT OFFICE: Omaha FILE NUMBER:2005-90-761 • PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Montana County: Gallatin Center coordinates of site(latitude/longitude): 45-42-21.3707 lat, It 1-0-53.1645 long Approximate size of area(parcel)reviewed,including uplands:unk acres. Name of nearest waterway:Bridger Creek Name of watershed: Gallatin JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Completed: Desktop determination ❑ Date: Site visit(s) ®' Date(s): 10-13-05 Jurisdictional Determination(JD): Preliminary JD-Based on available information,❑there appear to be(or)❑there appear to be no"waters of the United States"and/or"navigable waters of the United States"on the project site. A preliminary JD is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part 331). Approved JD—An.approved JD is an appealable action(Reference 33 CFR part 331). Check all that apply: There are"navigable waters of the United States"(as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: ❑',There are"waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: There are "isolated, non-navigable, intra-state waters or wetlands"within the reviewed area. Z Decision supported by SWANCC/Migratory Bird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No Jurisdiction. • BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: A. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as"navigable waters of the United States": 91. The presence of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used,or have been used in the past,or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. B. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 328.3(a)as"waters of the United States": (1)The presence of waters,which are currently used,or were used in the past,or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce,including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. (2)The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands. Q (3)The presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats, sandflats,wetlands,sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds,the use,degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters(check all that apply): ❑ (i)which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. ❑ (ii)from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ (iii)which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. (4)Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US. (5)The presence of a tributary to a water identified in(1)—(4)above. R (6)The presence of territorial seas. RA (7)The presence of wetlands adjacent2 to other waters of the US,except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. Rationale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination(applies to any boxes checked above). If the jurisdictional water or wetland is not itself a navigable water of the United States, describe connections)to the downstream navigable waters. If B(1)or B(3)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document navigability and/or interstate commerce connection (i.e., discuss site conditions, including why the waterbody is navigable and/or how the destruction of the waterbody could affect interstate or foreign commerce). If B(2, 4, 5 or 6)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document the rationale used to make the determination. If B(7)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document the rationale used to make adjacency determination: Wetland W-2-05 isolated • Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction: (Reference:33 CFR parts 328 and 329) Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: a High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ clear,natural line impressed on the bank ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ the presence of litter and debris ❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ tidal gages ❑ shelving ❑ other: ❑ other: Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑ survey to available datum; ❑physical markings; ❑vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. 0 Wetland boundaries,as shown on the attached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation report prepared by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction: The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands. Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1,2,or 4-7). Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR part 328.3(a)(3). El The Corps has made a case-specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the United States: ❑ Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons,pursuant to 33 CFR part 328.3. ❑ Artificially irrigated areas,which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased. ❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation,settling basins,or rice growing. ❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons. ❑ Water-filled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill,sand,or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 328.3(a). • ® Isolated, intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce. ❑ Prior converted cropland,as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service.Explain rationale: ❑ Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: ❑ Other(explain): DATA REVIEWED FOR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(mark all that apply): Maps, plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. ® This office concurs with the delineation report,dated 9-26-05,prepared by(company):Morrison Maierle Inc ❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report,dated prepared by(company): Data sheets prepared by the Corps. El Corps' navigable waters'studies: El U.S.Geological Survey Hydrologic.Atlas: Z U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: El U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles: El U.S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic quadrangles: El USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: M National wetlands inventory maps: State/Local wetland inventory maps: FEMA/FIRM maps(Map Name&Date): 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (NGVD) Aerial Photographs(Name&Date): Other photographs(Date): 0 Advanced Identification Wetland maps: ® Site visit/determination conducted on: 10-13-05 Applicable/supporting case law: Other information(please specify): • 'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual(87 Manual)(i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology). ZThe term"adjacent"means bordering,contiguous,or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S.by man-made dikes or barriers,natural river berms,beach dunes,and the like are also adjacent. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Revised 8/13/04 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers • DISTRICT OFFICE: Omaha FILE NUMBER: 2005-90-820 • PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Montana County: Gallatin Center coordinates of site(latitude/longitude): 45-42-25.6318 lat, 111-0-50.8024 long Approximate size of area(parcel)reviewed, including uplands:unk acres. Name of nearest waterway:Bridger Creek Name of watershed: Gallatin JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Completed: Desktop determination EJ Date:, Site visit(s) ® Date(s): 10-13-05 Jurisdictional Determination(JD): El Preliminary JD-Based on available information,❑there appear to be(or)❑there appear to be no"waters of the United States"and/or"navigable waters of the United States"on the project site. A preliminary JD is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part 331). Approved JD—An approved JD is an appealable action(Reference 33 CFR part 331). Check all that apply: ❑;There are"navigable waters of the United States"(as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: 2:There are"waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: There are "isolated, non-navigable, intra-state waters or wetlands"within the reviewed area. Decision supported by SWANCC/Migratory Bird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No Jurisdiction. • BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: A. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as"navigable waters of the United States": The presence of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used,or have been used in the past,or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. B. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 328.3(a)as"waters of the United States": (1)The presence of waters,which are currently used,or were used in the past,or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce,including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. El (2)The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands. (3)The presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats, sandflats,wetlands,sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds,the use,degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters(check all that apply): ❑ (i)which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. ❑ (ii)from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ (iii)which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. (4)Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US. (5)The presence of a tributary to a water identified in(1)—(4)above. (6)The presence of territorial seas. (7)The presence of wetlands adjacent'to other waters of the US,except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. Rationale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination(applies to any boxes checked above). If the jurisdictional water or wetland is not itself a navigable water of the United States, describe connections)to the downstream navigable waters. If B(l)or B(3)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document navigability and/or interstate commerce connection (i.e., discuss site conditions, including why the waterbody is navigable and/or how the destruction of the waterbody could affect interstate or foreign commerce). If B(2, 4,S or 6)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document the rationale used to make the determination. IfB(7)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document the rationale used to make adjacency determination: Wetland W-3-05 and Bridger Creek to Gallatin River to Missouri River(Sect10) • 2 • Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction: (Reference:33 CFR parts 328 and 329) Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: ❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ clear,natural line impressed on the bank ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects • ❑ the presence of litter and debris ❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ tidal gages ❑ shelving ❑ other: ❑ other: Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑survey to available datum; ❑ physical markings; ❑vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. Wetland boundaries,as shown on the attached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation report prepared by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction: The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands. El Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1,2,or 4-7). El Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR part 328.3(a)(3). El The Corps has made a case-specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the United States: ❑ Waste treatment systems,including treatment ponds or lagoons,pursuant to 33 CFR part 328.3. ❑ Artificially irrigated areas,which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased. ❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering,irrigation,settling basins,or rice growing. ❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons. ❑ Water-filled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill,sand,or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 328.3(a). • ❑ Isolated,intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce. ❑ Prior converted cropland,as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service.Explain rationale: ❑ Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: ❑ Other(explain): DATA REVIEWED FOR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(mark all that apply): Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. ® This office concurs with the delineation report,dated 9-26-05,prepared by(company): Morrison Maierle Inc ❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report,dated ,prepared by(company): Data sheets prepared by the Corps. Corps'navigable waters'studies: U.S.Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles: El U.S.Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic quadrangles: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: El National wetlands inventory maps: State/Local wetland inventory maps: El FEMA/FIRM maps(Map Name&Date): 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (NGVD) Aerial Photographs(Name&Date): 0 Other photographs(Date): Advanced Identification Wetland maps: �, Site visit/determination conducted on: 10-13-05 Applicable/supporting case law: Other information(please specify): 'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual(87 Manual)(i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology). 'The term"adjacent"means bordering,contiguous,or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S.by man-made dikes or barriers,natural river berms,beach dunes,and the like are also adjacent. ' • JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Revised 8/13/04 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers • DISTRICT OFFICE: Omaha FILE NUMBER:2005-90-820 • PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Montana County: Gallatin Center coordinates of site(latitude/longitude): 45-42-25.6318 lat, 111-0-50.8024 long Approximate size of area(parcel)reviewed,including uplands:unk acres. Name of nearest waterway: Bridger Creek Name of watershed: Gallatin JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Completed: Desktop determination Date: Site visit(s) ® Date(s): 10-13-05 Jurisdictional Determination(JD): El Preliminary JD-Based on available information,❑there appear to be(or)❑there appear to be no"waters of the United States"and/or"navigable waters of the United States"on the project site. A preliminary JD is not appealable (Reference 33 CFR part 331). Approved JD—An approved JD is an appealable action(Reference 33 CFR part 331). Check all that apply: ❑,There are"navigable waters of the United States"(as defined by 33 CFR part 329 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: There are"waters of the United States" (as defined by 33 CFR part 328 and associated guidance)within the reviewed area. Approximate size of jurisdictional area: There are "isolated, non-navigable, intra-state waters or wetlands"within the reviewed area. ❑, Decision supported by SWANCC/Migratory Bird Rule Information Sheet for Determination of No Jurisdiction. • BASIS OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: A. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 329 as"navigable waters of the United States": The presence of waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used,or have been used in the past,or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. B. Waters defined under 33 CFR part 328.3(a)as"waters of the United States": El (1)The presence of waters,which are currently used,or were used in the past,or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce,including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. El (2)The presence of interstate waters including interstate wetlands. Q (3)The presence of other waters such as intrastate lakes,rivers,streams(including intermittent streams),mudflats, sandflats,wetlands,sloughs,prairie potholes,wet meadows,playa lakes,or natural ponds,the use,degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate commerce including any such waters(check all that apply): ❑ (i)which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for.recreational or other purposes. ❑--(ii)from which ish o,-'shellfish are or could be taken-and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ (iii)which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. El (4)Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the US. ® (5)The presence of a tributary to a water identified in(1)—(4)above. El (6)The presence of territorial seas. 0 (7)The presence of wetlands adjacent2 to other waters of the US,except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. Rationale for the Basis of Jurisdictional Determination(applies to any boxes checked above). If the jurisdictional water or wetland is not itself a navigable water of the United States, describe eonnection(s)to the downstream navigable waters. If B(l)or B(3)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction, document navigability and/or interstate commerce connection. (i.e., discuss site conditions, including why the waterbody is navigable and/or how the destruction of the waterbody could affect interstate or foreign commerce). If B(2, 4, 5 or 6)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document the rationale used to make the determination. IfB(7)is used as the Basis of Jurisdiction,document the rationale used to make adjacency determination:Wetland W-3-05 and Bridger Creek to Gallatin River to Missouri River(Sect]0) • • 2 • Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction: (Reference:33 CFR parts 328 and 329) Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: 0. High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ clear,natural line impressed on the bank ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects • ❑ the presence of litter and debris ❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ tidal gages ❑ shelving ❑ other: ❑ other: Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑survey to available datum; ❑physical markings; ❑vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. Wetland boundaries,as shown on the attached wetland delineation map and/or in a delineation report prepared by: Basis For Not Asserting Jurisdiction: El The reviewed area consists entirely of uplands. El Unable to confirm the presence of waters in 33 CFR part 328(a)(1,2,or 4-7). Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 33 CFR part 328.3(a)(3). 0. The Corps has made a case-specific determination that the following waters present on the site are not Waters of the United States: ❑ Waste treatment systems,including treatment ponds or lagoons,pursuant to 33 CFR part 328.3. ❑ Artificially irrigated areas,which would revert to upland if the irrigation ceased. ❑ Artificial lakes and ponds created by excavating and/or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering,irrigation,settling basins,or rice growing. ❑ Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating and/or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons. ❑ Water-filled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill,sand,or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States found at 33 CFR 328.3(a). . • ❑ Isolated, intrastate wetland with no nexus to interstate commerce. ❑ Prior converted cropland,as determined by the Natural Resources Conservation Service.Explain rationale: ❑ Non-tidal drainage or irrigation ditches excavated on dry land. Explain rationale: ❑ Other(explain): DATA REVIEWED FOR JURSIDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(mark all that apply): Maps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant. ® This office concurs with the delineation report,dated 9-26-05,prepared by(company):Morrison Maierle Inc ❑ This office does not concur with the delineation report,dated prepared by(company): Data sheets prepared by the Corps. Corps' navigable waters'studies: ❑, U.S..Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: 0 U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic maps: U.S.Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic quadrangles: t U.S.Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic quadrangles: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey: 0 National wetlands inventory maps: 0 State/Local wetland inventory maps: FEMA/FIRM maps(Map Name&Date): 0 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (NGVD) Aerial Photographs(Name&Date): Other photographs(Date): Advanced Identification Wetland maps: Site visit/determination conducted on: 10-13-05 Applicable/supporting case law: Other information(please specify): 'Wetlands are identified and delineated using the methods and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual(87 Manual)(i.e., occurrence of hydrophytic vegetation,hydric soils and wetland hydrology). 'The term"adjacent"means bordering,contiguous,or neighboring. Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S.by man-made dikes or barriers,natural river berms,beach dunes,and the like are also adjacent. vfy+' t .. .. • MOM NENGINEERS 1� SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS NNERS MAERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 • FAX:4 6-5587-176 An Employee-Owned Company September 26, 2005 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Allan Steinle, State Program Manager 10 West 15'h Street, Suite 2200 Helena, Montana 59626 Subject: Legends at Bridger Creek II—Wetland Delineation Report and Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Status Verification MMI#: 3959.003 Dear Mr. Steinle: Enclosed please find one completed copy of the Wetland Delineation Report for Legends at Bridger Creek Ii. The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 project is located in Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East, Gallatin County, Montana. If feasible the design for project road construction and site improvements, as well as for residences and utility lines will be developed so as to.avoid impacts to wetlands observed to be jurisdictional during field investigation. We are requesting verification of the wetland boundaries provided in the enclosed Report as well as a jurisdictional determination for all wetlands at your earliest possible convenience. If you have any questions regarding the information provided, please call me at (406) 587-0721. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Paul cGuire Se for Environmental Scientist PWM/SER Enclosure cc: Matt Ekstrom, MMI 1/1 "Providing resources in Partnership with clients to achieve their goals" • • Fi-i MORRISON E � MAIERLE,INC. Technical Memo . An Employee-Owned Company To: Allan Steinle, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers From: Paul McGuire,Senior Environmental Scientist Sarah Rothschiller,Environmental Scientist Date: September 26,2005 Re: Legends at Bridger Creek H-Wetland Delineation Report MMI.#3959.003.301.0310 Cc: Matt Ekstrom,Edgefield,LLC INTRODUCTION At the request of Edgefield, LLC, Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group (MMI) examined the Legends at Bridger Creek II property on June 16 and 17, 2005, for the presence and extent of wetlands and waterways. The approximately 57-acre site is located in Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East, P.M.M. Gallatin County, Montana(Figure 1) and is proposed for residential subdivision development. • Two wetlands totaling 8.4 acres were identified and delineated on the Legends at Bridger Creek II property. The property is a relatively flat agricultural hayfield with a topographic change from west to east of approximately 40 feet. The properties to the north and east consist of agricultural hay fields, to the south is residential housing, and to the west the property is currently being developed for residential housing. Bridger Creek is located along the northern edge of the property. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to locate areas that satisfy the criteria for wetlands and non- wetland waterways and delineate their boundaries. A second objective was to provide observations as to the jurisdictional status of the delineated wetlands and waterways based on their hydrologic connection to a waters of the U.S. The delineation and jurisdictional observations are considered preliminary and are based on the results of on-site and off-site investigations. Final approval of the wetland boundaries and jurisdictional status must be provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). METHODS Wetlands were identified and delineated using the standard methodology described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, in an effort to meet the requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. • 0 Legends at Bridger Creek H Wetland Delineation Report Page 2 Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group September 2005 • Off-Site Review A preliminary off-site review was conducted to identify potential wetland areas and non-wetland waterways. The source documents used for this review included: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5' Bozeman, Montana Topographic Map (Figure 1); the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2002 Soil Survey of Gallatin County, Montana (Figure 2); a 1995 USGS aerial photograph(Figure 3); and the National Wetland Inventory(NWI) Map of the project area (Figure 4). On-Site Review Wetlands were identified as areas that met the standard criteria of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Wetland/upland boundaries were marked with pin flags and subsequently located by MMI using standard land surveying methods. MMI reviewed the surveyed wetland boundaries for accuracy. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland/upland boundaries. Data were recorded on a data form for at least one sample point on both the upland and wetland sides of the wetland boundary along a linear transect. These data forms are provided in Appendix A. Photographs of each sample point are provided in Appendix B. • Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 16 inches utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology unless shovel refusal prevented deeper sampling of the soil test pit. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent areal cover within a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer and a 20-foot radius for the tree and shrub layer within the community type being sampled. Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy was based on the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands for Region 9-Northwest and the 1993 Supplement to the List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands:Northwest(Region 9). Hydrology was determined based on factors such as depth to free water in soil test pits, soil saturation, occurrence of high water marks, and topographic position, among others. RESULTS The wetland delineation conducted by MMI, consisted of reviewing existing site-specific information and completing an on-site inspection with sampling using the Routine Level 2 Determination Method outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. The delineation effort consisted of a preliminary off-site investigation of available information and an on-site investigation that consisted of a pedestrian survey of the investigation area and delineation of two wetlands. • Legends at Bridger Creek II Wetland Delineation Report Page 3 Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group September 2005 • Off-Site Review A preliminary off-site review was conducted of the USGS 7.5' Bozeman, Montana Topographic Map, provided as Figure 1; the Soil Survey of Gallatin County, provided as Figure 2; a 1995 USGS aerial photograph, provided as Figure 3; and the NWI map, provided as Figure 4. USGS Topographic Map Legends at Bridger Creek II is located on the USGS 7.5' Bozeman, Montana Quadrangle. This topographic map shows Bridger Creek, which flows in a westerly direction along the northern edge of the property. The topographic map depicts Bridger Creek as a perennial stream that originates in the Bridger Mountain Range and terminates in the East Gallatin River. The topographic map also shows the property as a relatively flat parcel of land with an elevation between approximately 4,760 and 4,800 feet that slopes downward from east to west. Soil Survey Map The property investigated for this delineation effort occurs within the Sudworth-Nelda Loams (map unit 407A) and the Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex(map unit 606A). According to the Soil Survey of Gallatin County, Montana, hydric soil components do not occur within the Sudworth-Nesda Complex. Seventy percent of the Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex • comprises hydric soil components, which coincides with Bridger Creek. Aerial Photograph An aerial photograph of the subject property was evaluated for the presence of characteristics or features indicative of wetlands or waterways. The more densely vegetated area surrounding Bridger Creek is depicted on the photograph. The photograph shows that Bridger Creek is located along the northern boundary of the property. The majority of the property is shown as farmland with areas of trees and shrubby vegetation on its border. The surrounding area consists predominantly of agricultural and residential land. National Wetlands Inventory Map The property investigated for this delineation effort was located during the review of the NWI map. Bridger Creek was identified on the NWI map as R2UBF (riverine, lower perennial, unconsolidated bottom, semi-permanently flooded). On-Site Review The project site was evaluated in greater detail during the field investigation effort. The investigation of this site resulted in the delineation of two wetlands within the subject area identified as W-2-05 and W-3-05. A map of the project area showing the project boundary and • the surveyed locations of the delineated wetlands and their associated data points is provided as Figure 5. i i Legends at Bridger Creek H Wetland Delineation Report Page 4 Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group September 2005 • Wetland W-2-05 Wetland W-2-05 was delineated as part of the investigation effort for the Legends at Bridger Creek II property. This depressional wetland is located on the western project boundary. Field observations indicated that this wetland appeared to be isolated and therefore would likely be considered non-jurisdictional. Approximately 0.03 acre of this wetland was delineated within the property, and this wetland continues to the west and off site. Data were collected as part of the investigation effort. The hydrology indicator for W-2-05 is a drainage pattern in the wetland. The hydric soil indicator is low chroma(1 OYR 2/1). The dominant hydrophytic vegetation is red-osier dogwood(Corpus stolonifera, FACW), quaking aspen(Populus tremula, FAC+), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica, FAC+), and poison hemlock (Conium maculatum, FAC+). The delineation boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation from red-osier dogwood, quaking aspen, and stinging nettle in the wetland to Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense, FACU+), houndstongue (Cynoglossum ofcinale, FACU), and awnless brome (Bromus inermis, no status) in the upland. For supporting information refer to the data sheets provided in Appendix A and the photographs of the data sampling points in Appendix B. Wetland W-3-05 Wetland W-3-05 was delineated as part of the investigation effort for the Legends at Bridger • Creek II property. The 8.37 acre delineated area is a riverine wetland and includes Bridger Creek (in which there was water flowing at the time of the delineation) and its fringe wetland. Bridger Creek has been identified by the COE as a jurisdictional waterway; therefore, preliminary observations indicate that W-3-05 is jurisdictional. Bridger Creek continues west and east off ofthe property. Data were collected as part of the investigation effort. The hydrology indicator in the area of the wetland data point for W-3-05 is a wetland drainage pattern, saturation in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, drift lines, and a positive FAC-Neutral test in the wetland. The hydric soils are sandy loam with low a chroma(IOYR 3/2) and mottles (IOYR3/4). The dominant hydrophytic vegetation is red-osier dogwood, narrow-leaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia, FACW), quaking aspen, fowl bluegrass (Poa palustris, FAC), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW) and field mint (Mentha arvensis, FACW-). The delineation boundary primarily follows a change from a topographic depression within the historic floodplain to an upland terrace. The wetland/upland boundary also follows a change in vegetation from red-osier dogwood in the wetland to awnless brome, Canada thistle, and leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula, NS) in the upland. For supporting information refer to the data sheets provided in Appendix A and the photographs of the data sampling points in Appendix B. • Amok Project Location r!i Jr Y ;;P-► State of Montana; Gallatin County; City of Bozeman; -* F T1S, R6E, Sec 32 \ i \ X 31 INV F S. f GA. IO . RE ee86 i ��,h __ J 1 •• • (" Aa i Kpp • • f.�. 1T a 1 � or 0*1 0� Elul / LV FIGURE 1 GRAPHIC SCALE J 1500 750 1500 ARRISONLEGENDS AT BRIDGER -JIERMINC. CREEK II: VICINITY AND ( IN FEET YO 1.MA IM Td...K M.—W.WM•R.-(4M 59- n F-t44$,-nn TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CLIENT:EDGFIELD LLC FIELD WORK DATE:6/1/OS PLOTTED DATE: Sep/26/2005 - 01:35:01 pm DRAWN BY: SER SCALE:1'=1500' DRAWING NAME: H:\3959\001\ACM\E1IN19fIS\WE[-FlG.dwg CHECKED BY-PWM PROJ A105.001.301.03 HEET 1 OF 1 BRIDGER CREEK INVE TIGATION AREA. f ' 1 407A 06A f � ��� Y j♦ + , ;� A , 'y i r,ca�,•:� 4 �'� f ~Ti.�,4.7r• !!'�`t'�`!�/.�'r,�• � •J f' �1 BRIDGER CANYON�DRIYE� 4 USGS Orthoquadrangle Aerial 1995 Legend: with SSURGO Soils Data Overlay 407A - Sudworth-Nesda Loams, 0-2% Slopes 606A - Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Complex, 0-2% Slopes FIGURE 2 SOD GRAPHIC SCALE250soo �JMAIERL MORRISON JJ , INc. LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II ( IN FEET PO r 1113,Im Tdrr.:a.—r.SFM•V—("W-V" r-(ce W-m SOILS MAP CLIENT:EDGEFlLED LLC FIELD WORK* DATE:6/1/05 PLOTTED DATE: Sep/26/2005 — :01:37:4:2pm DRAWN By. SCALE: DRAWING NAME: : SER ' ' H:\3959\003\AGD\EXHNM\WET—nG.d.g CHECKED BY•PWM PROJ :4105.001.301.03 HEET --L—OF 1 ~ BRIDGER' Fi R' CREEK ` 1 w •� ,><<. AREA - I BRIDGER CANYON DRIVE ?�- ' Y �1\01*11op .« *IMF-w:�`rT.�,�,. .pa�'� ,+; � •� 1r �� • -— - - - -— USGS Orthoquadrangle Aerial 1995 FIGURE 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 500 MORRISON 250 m"' LEGENDS AT JJ MMERMINC. �Iw BRIDGER CREEK II ( IN FEET ) o.,,,,.,,,... r-ca „ AERIAL MAP CLIENT:RUGHEIMER FIELD WORK* DATE:6/23/05 PLOTTED DATE: Sep/26/2005 - 01:38:08 pm DRAWN BY: SER SCALE:1•=500' DRAWING NAME: H:\J9S9\00]\ACJ�D\EXN18fl5\WEf-F1C.d.q CHECKED BY- PWM PROJ .3959.003.301.03 HEET 1 OF 1— a • a e � � O -` BRIDGER CREEK INVESTIGATION ,7. AREA R2UBF BRIDGER CANYON DRIVEI -r 4 f r I • �• " A }.+•.ems I "!Jf *woo, A: Legend: USGS Orthoquadrangle Aerial R2UBF - Riverine, Lower Perennial, Unconsolidated 1995 with NWI Data Overlay Bottom, Semipermanently Flooded FIGURE 4 GRAPHIC SCALE J MORRISON LEGENDS AT soo 25o soo JJ MAIERLE,Ixc. - BRIDGER CREEK II ( IN FEET ) ..,e.—VL..•e^. r iva w rr.rr�t ee�r.9m•ft— r-(op eo-n N)Y 1 MAPCLIENT'EDGEFlELD LLC. FIELD WORK rD(ATE:6/23/05 PLOTTED DATE: Sep/26/2005 — 01:38:38 pm DRAWN BY: SER ALE:1'=500' DRAWING NAME: H:\3959\003\AGD\pflM$TS\W Ef-FlG.d,vg CHECKED RY EWM ROJ :4105.001,301.03JDSHEET 1 OF 1 • • A w� BRIDGER 1 S-3-05 --- . , • CREEK � S2-05 1 1 S--2-05 2 • • � Rio%" ~' • \ � � � � � '" ♦ / t W_3_05 �► " W-2-05 � ii v, • r ' INVESTIGATION AREA f o LEGEND: USGS ORTHOQUADRANGLE AERIAL 1995 FIGURE 5 WETLAND MORRISON LEGENDS AT MAIER_LE,INC. BRIDGER CREEK II 140 GRAMr SC 700 w e.,,,a m,r.�.s.aa.m..�.m.a>,r.n.,poq ar-am rs pop -Xn WETLAND DELINEATION WETLAND CONTINUES OFF OF PROPERTY ( 7N FEET 1 CLIENT: FIELD WORK:SR/EN DATE:6/30/0 PLOTTED DATE: Sep/26/2005 — 01:36:05 pm DRAWN BY: SE SCALE:1'm100' DRAWING NAME:wcr-wo N:\1959\0IX3\AdD\IXX18715\wET-rIG.O+g 59 CHECKED BY:PW PROJ b:39 .003 30. 1 03. SHEET OF arm D er:wuena.. Appendix A COE Data Sheets Job Number: 3959.003.301.0310 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-2-05-WL • Project/Site: The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Date: June 17,2005 Applicant/Owner: Edgefield LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT ....................._......................_......._.__...._.......................th--_....sf........ --....__._.—...._.._...._.......__._.._—..._.........._......._................._..._._.._...._.__....---....._..._...._....._....._....._................_.........._.-_. [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-2-05-WL [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species..._--.--____. Common Name %Cover Indicator .....---- ---- - _._ Herbaceous Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue FACU' Urtica dioica Nettle,Stinging FAC+ Conium Maculatum Poison-Hemlock FAC+ Shrub Rosa woodsii Rose,Woods FACU Cornus stolonifera Dogwood,Red-Osier FACW Tree Populus tremula _............._._. Aspen, _ -............. FAC+ -...._......__._._. _....__..__..._....._......-------..--.-__.--....__.._....._........_..._.......................--_... Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-):>50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks:'Indicator status is being reviewed. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 • Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, m. Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc. 0-16 A 10YR 3/1 Sandy Clay Loam Fine Suban ular Block Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ J Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 407A Sudworth-Nesda Loam,0-2% Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Well Drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • Job Number: 3959.003.301.0310 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-2-05-UPL • Project/Site: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Date: June 17,2005 Applicant/Owner: Edgefield LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT ....._....................._......................................._......_._...__..........._............._.......... ..................... ..................... _._.........................._................._.__........_.... .................. ..... [XJ Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-2-05-UPL [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species _ Common Name . %Cover Indicator Herbaceous Cirsium arvense Thistle,Canada FACU+ Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue FACU' Bromus inermis....-.---.._........---....__......._......----.__..---Brome,._Awnless NS __.._......_.........___._._....----...._..-.---.._........._.........-...---•--...._.._......._............_.._...._._......_........._..._ %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks:'Indicator status is being reviewed. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks • SOIIS Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.)................. Color Color _Abundance.__Contrast._____•____Structure,._etc.__._. .._....._....- ._..._ _ _._.._.... ......._. .—_... ._..._..._........ _---- 0-16 B 10YR 3/1 Sandy ClayLoam Fine Suban9 ular Block.Y... Hydric Soils Indicators [ )Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [ ]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 407A Sudworth-Nesda Loam,0-2% Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Well Drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • Job Number: 3959.003.301.0310 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-3-05-WL • Project/Site: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Date: June 17,2005 Applicant/Owner: Edgefield LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: State_: MT _ -.._.._.. ------------ [X] -- Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ )Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-3-05-WL [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant .__Species_.__._.__..__.____...______._......_..___.._.__...._._._... Common Name.._..._........._.......___. _. _. %Cover Indicator .._.........._._.._........_..................... - ............._._..__._.—. ----..._._ Herbaceous Poa palustris Bluegrass,Fowl FAC Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Mentha arvensis Mint,Field FACW- Shrub Cornus stolonifera Dogwood,Red-Osier FACW Salix exigua Willow,Sandbar OBL Alnus crispa Alder,Green FACW. Tree _....__...._Populus.angustifolia___-._..._.__........_ Cotton-W ood,.Narrow-Leaf._...................--........__..._........._.......---...—._._.._._...__FACW-.-------. %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks:"Indicator status is being reviewed. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ )Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [X]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands • Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 16 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in:).............................Color_..----......................._Color.._...._........__..........._Abundance..._..._Contrast Structure,etc. ................_.............._........--Y-..__..._�-------------.._------.9-....__........_......._.y_------- _..-....__------_.............. 0-16 A 10YR 3/2 10YR 314 common faint Sand Loam Medium Suban ular Block Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol ( ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon ( ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [X]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ( ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 606A Bandy-Riverwash-Sonebasin Taxonomy: Typic Endoaquolls Drainage Class: Poorly Drained [ )Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Bridger Creek • Job Number: 3959.003.301.0310 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: W-3-05-UPL • Project/Site: The Legends at Bridger Creek II Date: June 17,2005 Applicant/Owner: Edgefield LLC County: Gallatin Investigator: SR/EN State: MT .._._...._.....-..-._..........................._..._......_.._..._.---......_.-...._...._..._._-...._................_........._...._._...._..._.._._._............_.._.....-....._._..---........__..._............................................................._..........................._............... [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the sfte7 Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-3-05-UPL [ J Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant........_Species..._ Common Name %Cover Indicator ___._. _..._. __........._.__._._._.—._ Herbaceous -----._........._._.____..... Euphorbia esula Spurge,Leafy NI,UPL Cirsium arvense Thistle,Canada FACU+ Bromus inermis .................. . Brome,_Awnless. NS _._..._........_....._...._.........._..._......_._...._._.._—.—.._. ....._..-------_.._.._-----.....---...._.._...._......._._.......__.._..__._...._........_._......._.............._.. %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50%FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ J Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ J FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >24 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >24 Remarks • $OIIS Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.-.)........._....._.........Color_........_.._............._._.__Color_... —....._._..._.._Abundance_._.._Contrast_.—..—_Structure,._etc. .._.......__...._._......-- .._._....__.....--..._.._._..._...- ._._..._.... 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 Sandy Clay Loam Medium Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ J Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 606A Bandy-Riverwash-Bonebasin Taxonomy: Typic Endoaquolls Drainage Class: Poorly Drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks • Appendix B • Photographs Legends at Bridger Creek II Wetland Delineation Report Photographs Page 1 Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group September 2005 •r � e� JAI i ` '�� fir, ♦ �Vi ,.�� {I;l�����a1 �♦!i��,+��if•%..�. f/v' •j 1'i�Y'.�r ♦It i � ,/ � � sr!`i A•r �� ' /i/.� tj_r1y!;t�•.d' I.r. �ii,�. r..r��'.3,��" �i I�1�.�' p.l�•� ,� 1 �.�.p�`r.r j♦�Il t.� ��� `�r�"��"y.v.+��t�����/ +Ff+,�'d.P i,���� ,/�;kt�' w7r�Y� ty� / .�,?r+ l��� � •s;�N• R_��7t';�:..3f', i /�1��"'i%,. +�;r,n.•� ,�' j;�w��.1j►�,+,.�y, ,�� •./��.r r�1�,{li i!•f G L,I r �, '� „.rt�' �`�'K�'•�� ,�.•�r ; r�;• 1� f a r•� � e fir• f� .vr.�.s,., ,r� 3� ' �..:`�/ �±�:�.'!tJ/s".'•sxl�%.Pi/..3 �r,�E�J,.X�'� ;.��>��.�r' /�.��3'dt► �. �M i!"!',���rs►�1.�/T�::�,�rLI r" • Photo 1. View west of S-2-05 1, wetland data point. i �!".row, ��+ !t 1 :l;.;t'` '' �'r:r► jt r+t ftft G.!'t"jyi.ti• War! �' tL! }1 ♦Y. r I. r, 4 i .rrl`O iff4� ll•'�'.l, fr"�j/ tr! .F; t •trt.� ,1; �� � ~• r��ij�;�! �,r ('♦`,t•t t ,� ,(� ' .sr,,�{{ r r j�,�vt�• fr.t r IY '� t Tr ' rot `'+'1. �" .♦+) "r� � Y��• �,y',jl, .lf� —,� � .,�. �,�j ,i,r,•s �►,t f* Ire. ��}rih�r •ri,1!� rjr~� Y♦ { r 7 t •''..1�>i t/s' �j�t� rr r ti �. . ♦' r �,,,►d �Y�,r ') t,T�,;,'7' t6.'lry illil�r Ij �i / l..11`~ + y �' 1t''it f• .-�t�;t�•f' �ri•1>r' d���' �^��i(��+�.i�'� f� F �r'�h'�:��ft..I '... �'-•�`i�.i' _ r'" ..'' r�+`�s• •tJ�� ?`��•t. ,4,`,ir�^f11ta 1`e�.^tii r 1:Ci"' r;'i1c'.1�F� �.'. Olr� + ��.•' .r;- � s-..�� �y: . J�r t'iS• + ��•' iyC.. t.i�J "�i.fjf t't�:✓ /�:.. • ��� ;c•.,/f-vrs.�.a�1',�.�f�y•��''r ran' � )' _. 6{�'•,7• 1S' r � _dry/" i /!• r"1 _ ..et. r.s r �•1�•:i 4 "ltr �, �4� l• � r t •'�' fin. -'Js•1tQ r :1 :s ^i 7 t' �fr y` �:r,h•r.f�rv;77 IstF� `'���ty} d� ��� r I _ � ,` � , '• ��J r ±) • • 7 y r s ,fir• �y�- � rjf♦��Ti •}� ���. � ��i'� ♦ Y,h ����1,. ►� � ;. g` ` � ♦�ra <»�,M 'tf���� �. � " ` :.'>r }r ` . F '=yrA� ylllti '♦'1 E��/l�'�4. •j. 1;,� i` ,�J. .��.. .� 1� � a i.��•� 1 r.,f,(r,,r(f� /R1'jt�f+i�/� 1. 1:J� � iJ� �.`3.• �l .'f11J.r9♦���..�E�� 1 t•Y A//d►���1� •��'♦.'�' {'`�0•♦'�yH+h�.'y'r1="• •r►Y'1`^`1 � 11♦ �, /��((yyftl7 �:rd" '`(�i T A► 4 6J � Ii. u..�'. � wY ��.'V�4wr. �f�1� Y�I��C�.�l� • Photo 2. View west of S-2-05 2, upland data point. f Legends at Brid er Creek II Wetland Delineation Report Photographs Page 2 Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group September 2005 • _ Z �� �. . � $ •v t � �:mil,�. •�4sS `.�{�► ! � \ !, f L ( '•. +� ��'ate• JIB .fin�f i ,#r. l ,:;' � `� ��• t��u �� �.;'�i✓1 } '�il�� ,.L\i'`��, .'���}`'w`"T.l�r�+� "•;�;�� ��_���.�•�}tit',f^'j�;,,�'�y���J'•" '��' s. ..l �i Y1+� ,� Wr r• �1 * +t � �,� �;� ��it.��}��'�4 1'1�,�•�, 't•f"�f �i,�� ��i,';I*. r `! ,ni�' '��.. -Y�-��'Y_. !1 �•.. ' FCM 11 �h+ ii 1 ���f ru t;',y� �! '�� 1�i,i. Y s'st'+ �� � �� '��!�{� ��+ '�! �p1 . ;i.t �►� c. '4 <4fI e 1� �-- -�'.� .',�+ .{�'�+ ra � /�`"CY'�1 •� �,�,4+'� �4 S t'�.'t�R I�,�1 y /� •ti j .rfrs`/ r ` fJ .. ; SEA • Photo 3. View west of S-3-05 1, wetland data point. �•�'�'.,�.,`;.`�(� �•- {. ` � .�`_ �• ? tit`,L�y ,.. •{.1f�1 '�� (�'1,•`•,tl i' 3r�`)�, �"Y •�,';.�fi���Jf+1C�a1���1y'>r}�,rr,/r'�S ��1L,�► .'s �' 410iF°S' *t>t� ,S�+ r►r'r�,���IJ•+ y� �" ,.� ,��"�;.• tl a ir.'1 ,I e:� r�� ; t��.}`��`�k�� �'>,►r' , � iiiJJJ���777 ' It f r��.1 ''u 1�'1�+7 �.'�'; r•�fS, �r��r �� �`. 9` `•l,;ll,` �'`Jr��'r��', i�:t�r/-�f;'`�»�{ � l .��S ��f••� �-' �,,r,' •S, j W.., ;� y>;,�1 .r�Jpr`� •'� t9 . � it�`'��'t'�.' ��, Er. .'.'w�jAt��1 r.4�,(Y�.�4` t '1'1 / r 1,' �3`T j •..�1,�j � t' � !P+i •", 1 y�,,+.,5� �' ♦+tY i ,f ��M �! �Q ty ���PPI' ' �1 a,.:,�';,!'�' �I�1•'r•1il it !� r. "'i(I"!��'�}�3�7r •,.`t {.?. E`.t: t . 4`t .� ��, �{1� 1;, � 1, �' �� �, ��j!' �T. i �:i�•� r.,��/��,�:S�J� t �,rr11 r, � + i��,11 ,.+i� �•1. '.jr� "`qq9 �`` ',1 .; f�•�I .+.'� t`��`��" ,f _ • Photo 4. View west of S-3-05 2, upland data point. • F • • • Weed Management Plan Galatia Cowa+t 1feed mllkt MEMO TO: Matt Eckstrom Edgefield, LLC FROM: Dennis Hengel, Coordinator Gallatin County Weed District DATE: January 5, 2006 • RE: Legends at Bridger Creek II Enclosed is a copy of the approved Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for the Legends at Bridger Creek II subdivision. If you have any questions please contact me at 582-3265. DH/rp Enc. 901 N. Black Bozeman, MT 59715 (406) 582-3265 FAX: 582-3273 • 20 December 2005 Mr. Dennis Hengel Gallatin County Weed Coordinator 901 N Black Ave. Bozeman,MT. 59715 Dear Mr.Hengeh ----- Enclosed please find the noxious weed management plan for the Legends at Bridger Creek II subdivision submitted for review. Included are the plan, a vicinity map, a plat map, a weed inventory map, and a check in the amount of$300 to cover the fee for a major subdivision. The developer on the property is BrownStone Capital, Inc. of Missoula MT, the Engineering firm is Land West Consulting, LLC, of Bozeman MT, and the weed plan consultant is James Jacobs of Bozeman,MT. James Jacobs will serve as the contact person for the plan. Jacobs conducted a weed inventory on 2 June 2005. The property is currently a productive hay meadow with only a few dozen houndstongue plants in the field. Most of the noxious weeds are confined to the riparian corridor. The plan calls for containment of • these populations using hand pulling/grubbing, application of 2,4-D herbicide, and revegetation of disturbances with perennial grass species. Thank you for your review of this plan. If you need any other information or have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James S. Jac s 2103 Star Ri ge Rd Bozeman,MT 59715 406-580-6608 • p , 000O�D • SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND alatinCo�ud REVEGETATION PLAN(PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) G V�eed (Revised May 2004) �iatrict Projected date for Preliminary Plat application JanuM 2006 Date Plan received 2005 Before construction/disturbance begins,please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board.This plan may n mhrqmentofthNoios"WM ,requirereviiotoeetues -and-the- Montana -- County Noxious Weed Control Act.Upon approval by the Board,this plan must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or appointed Representative in cooperation with the agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1.Name of Cooperator: Brownstone Capital,Inc. (Print Full Name and Name of Company) P.O.Box 1599 Missoula,Montana 59806 (406)541-9000 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2.Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: Legal Description_ Parcel I: Lots 27 and 28 of Mount Baldy Subdivision,a subdivision in Gallatin County,Montana,according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder,Gallatin County,Montana. (Plat Reference: F-10) Parcel II: A tract of land located in the North one-half(N1/2)of the South one-half(S1/2)of Section 32,Township 1 South,Range 6 East,M.P.M.,Gallatin County,Montana,which tract is more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SE 1/16 section comer of said Section 32 run South 88 degrees 57' 05" West along the South 1/16 section line for 2626.98 feet to an iron pin and the SW 1/16 section comer of said Section 32,thence run North 3 degrees 15'42"West along the West 1/16 section line of said Section 32 for 1314.28 feet,more or lest to the tread of the stream of Bridger Creek-,thence run southeasterly along said thread of the stream for about 3250 feet to the East 1/16 section line of said Section 32,thence run South 3 degrees 25' 38"East along the East 1/16 section line of said Section 32 for 894.39 feet,more or less,to the point of beginning being Tract 2 as shown on"Plat recorded in Film 12,Page 825." If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision: The Legends at Brier Creek II Subdivision,Story Mill Road,Bozeman,Montana. 3.Land Use(Please check the appropriate box(s) (a)Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture® Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ . Please explain: Hay (b)Future Land Use 1 Agriculture❑ Residential ® Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ • Please explain: Single-family residences. 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes® No❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes ® No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes ® No ❑ 7. Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes ® No ❑ 8. Has the Cooperator attached written estimates of weed control and revegetation costs? Yes ® No ❑ B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes® No ❑ Unknown(due to snow cover)❑ If yes,list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s). Attach map showing location of noxious weeds on property. If unknown due to snow cover,Cooperator will submit a completed noxious weed inventory and explanation of control methods for approval by the Weed Control District by May 15th of the upcoming field season. Canada thistle: 500 square feet • common tansy: 300 square feet poison hemlock: 300 square feet leafy spurge: 50,000 square feet Houndstongue: a few dozen isolated plants (Gallatin County noxious weeds are listed in section III of Noxious Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/disturbance of the property. Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property outline the infestation(s)on a map of the property or on a subdivision plat map. Noxious weeds are predominantly within the riparian corridor.A 30 foot buffer zone along the riparian corridor will be maintained with perennial grasses and alfalfa and protected from disturbances related to development.Weeds within this corridor will be controlled by herbicide application and hand pulling and grubbing_in spring(May or June)and Fall(September)annually.Noxious weeds may arise during disturbances associated with construction.Revegetation of disturbances with perennial grasses at completion of disturbances will be used to manage any noxious weed in disturbed areas.Revegetation will include periodic herbicidal control of noxious weeds as needed during disturbances and seeding perennial grasses. IS PROPERTY FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION? YES ❑ NO IF PROPERTY IS FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION THE FOLLOWING MANDATORY CONDITION OF APPROVAL APPLIES: If property is fallow,in stubble,or in small grain production,once agricultural production ceases,that area of the property not under immediate development will be planted to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District. See Revegetation Section,C. 1.,for complete details regarding reseeding and grass reestablishment requirements. • 3. Please complete the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Herbicide Control: . 2 • *Noxious Weed Canada thistle Chemical Name 2.4-D Rate 2 qts/acre *Noxious Weed common tansy Chemical Name 2A-D Rate 2 at/acre *Noxious Weed poison hemlock Chemical Name 2A-D Rate 2 ats/acre *Noxious Weed leafy spurge Chemical Name 2A-D Rate 2 qts/acre * Timing and method of treatment(s): Noxious weeds listed above will be spot-or broadcast-sprayed with appropriate herbicides in the spring and fall. Weeds within close proximity to water(i.e. irrigation ditches and. Bridger Creek)will be sprayed only with herbicides approved for riparian areas or weeds will be mowed and/or removed by shovel. Herbicide control woik"done-by=Self []'or Contracted- Name-of Contractor James Jacobs--- - Estimated cost of herbicide control: Year One: $990.00* Year Two: $990.00** Year Three: $990.00* Total: $2,970.00 • Estimate provided by: James Jacobs (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) *The estimated cost of weed control is based on the current weed infestation.Actual costs could be more or less depending on environmental conditions,response of weeds to management,and weed invasion after disturbances associated with development. (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: *Methods of weed control: Mowing and/or removal by shovel for weeds within close proximity to water. *Timing of control method(s): Concurrent with chemical treatment in the spring and fall. Cultural/Mech control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted® Name of Contractor James Jacobs Estimated cost of cultural/mechanical control: Year One: $130.00 Year Two: $130.00 Year Three: $130.00 Total: $390.00 • Written estimate provided by: James Jacobs (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 3 • (c) Biological Control: *Biological control agent(s) N/A *Timing of the release(s)of the Bio-control agent(s): *Weed control method(s)used to control weed spread while insects establish: Biological control work done by-Self❑or Contracted FName of Contractor Estimated cost of Biological control: Year One: Year Two: Year Three: Total: Written estimate provided by: (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (d) Total Estimated Costs of Weed Control(Herbicide+Cultural/Mechanical+Biological)for three (3)Years: Year Herbicide Cultural/Mechanical Biological 1 $990.00 $130.00 N/A 2 $990.00 $130.00 N/A 3 $990.00 $130.00 N/A Total $2,970.00* $390.00* N/A Total: $3,360.00 * See cost estimate breakdown on page 9 of this plan. • 4 0 • C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS • 1. Is property fallow or in small grain production? Yes ❑ No If property is fallow or in small grain production outline the area that is fallow or in production on a map of the property or on a subdivision plat map. a) If yes,area of disturbance(acres): Note: IF PROPERTY IS FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION THE FOLLOWING MANDATORY CONDITION OF APPROVAL APPLIES: If property is fallow,in stubble or in small grain production,once agricultural production ceases,that area not under immediate development (within 12 months)—will be——1—n—ted to a grass—se—ed mi x as—a—ro—ve— d-tiytheWeed-District—Cooperator-will revegetate and establish grasses on that portion of the property previously fallow, in stubble,or in small grain production. This includes that portion of the property dedicated to open space,parklands,or common areas. In conjunction with the grass seeding,during the first and second years of grass establishment,and in the third week of June and in the fourth week of July,the area seeded to grass will be mowed to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. 2. Will utility/service lines be installed? Yes ® No ❑ a) If yes,length of service lines(ft.or miles): Utilities infrastructure will be installed in the same corridor as the road system. A separate calculation for the area of disturbance attributed to utilities is not necessary. b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq.ft.): N/A • c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil N/A 3. Will a pond be constructed? Yes ® No ❑ Stormwater treatment ponds will be constructed. a) If yes, area of disturbance(sq. ft.): 12,500 square feet 0.3 acre) b) If yes, list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 231 cubic yards 4. Will a road system be constructed? Yes ® No ❑ a) If yes,length of road(ft.or miles): 7,980 feet b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq.ft): 119,700 sq.ft.(2.75 acres) c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 2,217 cubic yards -topsoil will be removed and stockpiled and redistributed during the finish • grading_operation. No topsoil will removed from the project. 5. Other disturbances Yes ❑ No 5 If yes,explain • 6. List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas(fallow ground,fallow/stubble areas,service lines,fire pond,road system,others)listed above. Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in 6a. Fall-dormant seeding will occur between October 15 and November 15,2005. During the first and second years(2006 and 2007)of grass establishment,seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July. MANDATORY REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS: Areas disturbed during subdivision development (road construction—pond-construction,—service/utility/gas/electric/telephone-line-installation)-will have-a-611- - (six inch)layer of topsoil redistributed onto disturbed areas.Disturbed areas will be seeded to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District.In conjunction with the grass seeding,during the first and second years of grass establishment,and in the third week of June and in the fourth week of July,the areas seeded to grass will be mowed to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. a) If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: Mix: 35%`Durar'hard fescue;35%sheep fescue; 10%smooth brome; 10%tall fescue, 10%Canada bluegrass Rate: 20 lbs/acre Note: Grass seed mix and rate recommended by Circle S Seeds. • b) If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used: N/A Type Rate Type Rate Type Rate c) Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate seeding/sod date(s)October 15 to November 15,2005 Approximate fertilizer date(s)N/A Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 151h for a spring seeding or after October 151h for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ® Name of Contractor: James Jacobs • d) Estimated cost of Revegetation: 6 a (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): 1,308 cubic yards • (2) Soil Replacement Cost: (includes cost of bringing onsite 6"lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area): Cost of topsoil, equipment,transport,and spreading=$16,350.00. This estimate is based on a rate of$12.50 per cubic yard of topsoil,including labor. (Estimate provided Rod Van Dyken Trucking and Excavating). This cost will be excluded from the"Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 Years"because additional topsoil will not be necessary for successful revegetation of disturbed areas. Existing topsoil onsite will be separated from subsoil and stockpiled for redistribution prior to seeding. (3) Seed Cost: $1,384.00 (4) Labor Cost: $3,000.00 (5) Mowing Cost: $5,200.00 (6) Other costs: N/A Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 years: Year One: $4,384.00 Year Two: $2,600.00 Year Three: $2,600.00 Total: $9,584.00 • Date revegetation work to be completed by: November 15,2005 (This date refers to initial revegetation and excludes the mowing schedule to be implemented in 2006 and 2007.) Written estimate provided by: James Jacobs (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 7. Total estimated cost of implementing Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for a period of three(3)years(includes Herbicide+Cultural/Mechanical+Biological+Revegetation costs): Year Herbicide Cultural/Mechanical Biological Reve etation 1 $990.00 $130.00 N/A $4,384.00 2 $990.00 $130.00 N/A $2,600.00 3 $990.00 $130.00 N/A $2,600.00 Total $2970.00 $390.00 N/A $9,584.00 Grand Total: $9,584.00 * See cost estimate breakdown on page 10 of this plan. i 7 • • APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN • APPROVED$1, APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED ❑ AND/OR CONDITIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS: Upon Approved or Approved With Recommendations/Conditions the Cooperator agrees to comply with the above submitted Noxious Weeq Manage d Revegetation Plan. • (Signature of Weed Board Cha' epres ive) (S' ' ature of Cooperator) (Type/print name of Chairm epresen e) (Type/print name of Cooperator) o)o �10 6 1151,06 (Date) (Date) (Sign ' e of /an-d/ow/ner) (Type/print name of Landowner) (Date) j With submittal of the Memoranda of Understanding for final plat approval the Cooperator will provide: 1. Documentation that the above Weed Management&Revegetation Plan has been implemented. 2. Copy of subdivision covenants that apply to noxious weed management. • FASubdivision PlanASUBDIVISION wMP REVISION II 2004.doe' p . O Weed Management Plan—Aspens at Bridger Creek Subdivision(MMI0658.002.04) • Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group October 2004 COST ESTIMATE OF HERBICIDE CONTROL: 2,4-D(1 gallon) $20.00 Herbicide Application($85.00 x 5 hours) $425.00 Spring and fall applications Total for Year 1 $990.00 Total for Year 2 $990.00 Total for Year 3 $990.00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE OF HERBICIDE CONTROL(3 YEARS)...................$2,970.00 Note: Cost estimates assume weed control for years 2 and 3 because weed eradication is not probable in the first or following years. COST ESTIMATE OF MECHANICAL CONTROL: Pulling an grubbing weeds within close proximity to water: $85.00/hour Total for Year 1 $130.00 • Total for Year 2(2 hours) $130.00 Total for Year 3(2 hours) $130.00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE OF MECHANICAL CONTROL(3 YEARS)..............$390.00 Note: Estimate anticipates weed control for years 2 and 3 because weed eradication will not be possable in the first year. • 9 Weed Management Plan—Aspens at Bridger Creek Subdivision(MMI#3658.002.04) • Morrison-Maierle, Inc.,Environmental Services Group October 2004 COST ESTIMATE OF REVEGETATION: Seed mix(recommended by Circle S Seeds for specific site and land use objectives): 35%`Durar' hard fescue 35%sheep fescue 10%smooth brome 10%tall fescue 10%Canada bluegrass Seed mix cost=$1.73/lb Seeding rate of 20 lbs/acre for broadcast seeding Seeding area=40 acres 800 lbs seed mix at$1.73/lb Seed Cost $1,384.00 Seeding Labor Cost: 40 acres at$75.00/acre $3,000.00 Mowing: $65.00/hour;40 acres=20 hours(local travel time included): $1,300.00/mowing 2 mowings in 2006: $2,600.00 2 mowings in 2007: $2,600.00 Total: $5,200.00 Mowing Cost $5,200.00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE OF REVEGETATION (3 YEARS)........................$9,584.00 H:13959\002\D0CS\Weeds\Legends II Weed Management Plan 2005.doc 10 • • • G Wildlife • Legends @ Bridger Creek H Preliminary Wildlife Assessment Robert L. Eng • • LEGENDS @ BRIDGER CREEK II N'/2 OF THE S'/:OF SEC.32,T 1S,R 6E GALLATIN COUNTY PRELIMINARY WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT he north %2 of the property is bordered on the west by the Legends @ Bridger Creek I Subdivision, on the south by the Vogel Subdivision, on the east by the Greenwood Subdivision and on the north by Bridger Creek. The north boundary is described as the center line of the creek. Seven trips were made to the property between May 27 and Junel6. All trips to the property were made during early morning or early evening, periods of increased wildlife activity. Twice during evening hours,tapes of certain nocturnal, more secretive species were played to entice response indicating their presence. The major portion of the property is occupied by a hayfield which is dominated by a single species, smooth.brome(Bromus inermis),providing virtually no species or structural diversity. Two walking transects into the field produced a single bird observation( Savannah sparrow ) , deer beds and occasional deer tracks. Most of the minimal animal sign observed in the hayfield was within 50 yards of the riparian habitat along the river • The linear wooded segment of the property along Bridger Creek with its well developed riparian habitat is in sharp contrast to the remainder of the property in terms of wildlife habitat. The well structured layers of vegetation provide both plant species and structural diversity which is reflected by the number of wildlife species present. Mature and immature cottonwoods (Populus tricocarpa) and to a lesser degree trembling aspen(Populus tremuloides) contribute to the upper'layers while common chokecherry(Prunus virginiana) ,willow(Salix sp. ), and alder(Alnus incana)provide an intermediate layer. The very diverse lower shrub layer includes such species as red- osier dogwood ( Cornus stolonifera), snowberry (Symphoricarpos occidentalis) and rose (Rosa sp. ). Mammals Mammals listed below are either known to occur based on sign* (tracks etc), actual sightings** or are likely occupants based on published distribution and availability of preferred habitat. No effort was made to sample potential small mammal occupants. Pocket gopher Thomomys talpoides* Beaver Castor Canadensis* Meadow vole Microtus pennsylvanicus Porcupine Erethizon dorsatum Red fox Vulpes vulpes Muskrat Ondatra zebethicus** Raccoon Procyon lotor* Short-tailed weasel Mustela erminea Long-tailed weasel Mustela frenata Mink Mustela vison** • Striped skunk Mephitis mephitis Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus White-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus** Habitat for larger animals on the property is present primarily in the linear strip in • along the river. The habitat across the river away from the riparian zone presently does not have the degree of human encroachment found near this property. The corridor of cover for larger mammals provided by the well developed riparian zone along the river is likely used by large mammals during certain seasons and weather conditions. However, the close proximity of this habitat to housing developments sets the stage for conflicting use. Birds As stated earlier,the well developed riparian zone along either side of Bridger Creek provides the only quality habitat with structural diversity extending from the ground to the upper reaches of the mature cottonwood trees. Birds are best able to take advantage of the variety of niches provided in this habitat. This is reflected in the diversity of the 45 species of birds listed below which were either observed or heard on the property. Mallard Red-tailed hawk Cooper's hawk Belted kingfisher Ring-necked pheasant Killdeer Spotted sandpiper Wilson's snipe Mourning dove Calliope hummingbird Downy woodpecker Northern flicker • Least flycatcher Warbling vireo Black-billed magpie American crow Common raven Tree swallow Northern rough-winged swallow Black-capped chickadee House wren Mountain chickadee Red-winged blackbird Veery American robin Gray catbird European starling Cedar waxwing Yellow warbler . Yellow-rumped warbler Common yellow-throat Western tanager Chipping sparrow Savannah sparrow Song sparrow Dark-eyed junco Black-headed grosbeak Brewer's blackbird Brown-headed cowbird Bullock's oriole House finch House sparrow Eastern kingbird Pine siskin Great-horned owl Based on the published data on bird distribution of birds in Montana, time spent on the property and personal experience in the field, the following additional birds could be expected to use this habitat, at least seasonally. • Northern harrier American kestrel • Western screech owl Western Wood pewee American dipper Mountain bluebird Swainson's thrush American redstart Wilson's warbler Macgillivray's warbler Lasuli bunting Chipping sparrow Threatened and Endangered Species No animals listed under Animal Species of Special Concern(Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena—2003)were observed or are known to occupy this property. Bald eagles, listed as threatened by the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service, are known to nest along some of the larger.rivers within the Gallatin Valley and are observed regularly as seasonal migrants at which time they could very likely be observed on or near this property . Wildlife Potential on Legends @ Bridger Creek II A large portion of this property is currently dedicated to hay production with the vegetative cover a monoculture of smooth brome. This portion of the property has no species or structural diversity making it very marginal from the standpoint of wildlife habitat. In its present condition only marginal use by wildlife could be expected. • Most of the species of birds observed along the river are known to be breeding residents(House wren, Catbird, Song sparrow). The multi-layered vegetative structure of the riparian habitat provides many options for nest sites from those nesting on or close to the ground(Song sparrow, Brewer's blackbird, Spotted sandpiper)to those in the upper layers provided by the cottonwoods(Bullock's oriole, Common crow, Red-tailed hawk). The cottonwood snags provide sites,for cavity nesting birds which make up approximately 25 % of those observed on the property. As indicated,most of the use of the property is by resident species. The cover provided by the riparian zone along the river undoubtedly is used at least seasonally as a travel lane or corridor coming out of the mountains. However, with the surrounding housing developments in place or.being planned, some conflict can be expected and covenants to reduce these conflicts should be employed. • � • H i Cultural Resources • • ANT'HRO RESEARCH INCORPORATED • LARRY A. LAHREN PH.D. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1218 _ Physical Address: 53 Mission Meadow Road Livingston, MT 59047 • (406) 222-3168 (Phone/Fax) • (406) 223-3168 (Cell) = ' www.larrylahren.com "Since 1971"' Email: larrylahren@msn.com June 4, 2005 Reference: Cultural Resource Evaluations of the Legends At Bridger Creek II Project, Gallatin County, Montana. Legal Location: 50 acres in the NWSW of Section 32, T. IS, R.16E, Gallatin County, Montana. File Search Results: A file search was conducted at the State Historic Preservation Office in Helena, Montana on May 31, 2005. One previous cultural resource survey has been conducted on 20 acres of land that is immediately adjacent to the 50 acres evaluated in this project(see attached report). Reconnaissance Evaluations: • Field reconnaissance evaluations were conducted on the proposed development area on June 1, 2005. A series of zig-zag tracts spaced at 10-50 were walked over the 50 acre tract which is currently hay land. According to the landowner, the area has been farmed since 1864. The area is essentially part of the same hayfield that was evaluated in April of 2004 and consists of 30-50 centimeters of a dark A horizon and a thin B horizon over medium to large stream gravels. Proximity to Bridger Creek suggests that the area was once beaver ponds. Reconnaissance Findings and Recommenations: No prehistoric or historic cultural resources were located from the file search or the field reconnaissance evaluations of the subject property. Project approval is recommended with the stipulation that the consulting archaeologist be contacted if buried cultural resource materials are accidently discovered during construction activities. Larry Lahren, Ph.D. • �'Srigilt, ` MAN Wl III . ., \ �r' _ --mot • �J„`✓yl' � S t ,il'��ff��,,,,�I ' �. I � err '�� � ��-�,', � �{r ��`/�\�l� Z�1�f ' •�` �. �` _ �q�� ..7:�?R:Nfa Ji;+. I � tk.,i� ' ��.C� �'� � �;�^"�' \t�`�Fi•\``rt�� :� {S) {`mar �y� •�l Rg' I.� .y'_'�: �r::�, 11^Y:'�.�_�iri.:�.t.�i�:iu�i � ',•�:. I.� ��` ::���`��:i { Sy M110 / NSA 4 NJ Alm ��ty�4✓�'� _I LAW".�SY1�,���_ ��_ j,���1�:�i�.'�•�• _ '�__ i ii ` \��'�'����::1 �I •�� � �. a' 'a' i =' '1 !� ._ • ,� �� • .. � � i .♦l A' S. v a � '� • Montana Cultural Resource Annotated Bibliography System • DATA ENTRY FORM DOCUMENT NUMBER: i ► REPORT DATE: County File Report No. code code (SHPOuseonly) AUTHOR (Last, First, '.lidd1c et al): I'AliRe N � Z,40fl y TITLE: C v -t/1/ I R e im"s e t o 4 gK tic► r AGENCY: OTHER AGENCIES:(1) (2) OTHER COUNTIES: (1) (2) AGENCY DOCUMENTIPROJECT NO: SURVEY ACRES: J 0 DOCUMENT TYPE: _ )� 1. Inventory/Evaluation 3. Overview . 2. Mitigation/Excavation 4. Other KEYWORDS: (SHPO use only) (1) (2) (3) • (4) (5) (6) (7) INVENTORY LOCATION PROPERTIES. T R S Site Number Property/Site Name Z 1. 2. I I 3. I ' I 3. 4. ( ( 4. 5. I I 5. " 6. I I 6. 7 I I 7 & I I & 9 I I 9 10. I I 1Q 11. 12. I I 12. • 13. I I 13. 14. I I 14. 15. I I is. Attach to lnventnry rrnnrt anri cPnd tn?CtatP T4;ctnrir Prn r-vatinn llM-- VIA--*---LT1..•..-e..-1 ANTURORESEARCH l INCORPORATED . LARRY A. LAmRw PxLD. 'Ma"A.dd ws: P-0. Box 1218 �.. _ • Physical Address: 53 Mission Meadow Road Livingston,W 59047 i (406)222 3168 (Phone/Fax) * (406)223-3168 (Cell) www.lanylahzmcom "Since 197i" Email: knylaluM@MS t.Com April 19,2004 Project Reference: Aspen Partners I Project-Gallatin County,Montana SHPO Project: 2004041408 Legal.Location:NWSW of Section 32,T. 1S,R. 16E, Gallatin County,Montana. File Search Results: A file search was conducted on April 14,2004,at the State Historic Preservation Office in Hera,Montana for Section 32,Township 1 South,Range 6 East(Gallatin County, Montana)to determine if previous cultural resource surveys have been conducted and cultural resource sites have been located in the pmoject area.The results of this file search indicated that three previous cultural resource surveys have been conducted in Section • 32,but none have been within the subject tract(NWSW of Section 32,T. 1 S,R.16E)of these investigations. Reconnaissance Evaluations Field reconnaissance evaluations of the proposed development area were conducted on April 16,2004. The proposed development tract comsts of 20 ac=of fomer meadow and riparian land that is located along floc south side of Bridget Cols,a west-flowing tributary of the East Gallatin River.At the time of the evaluations,the entire 20 acre tract had been recently plowed. Soils on the site consist of about 30- 50 centimeters of a dark, organic A horizon and a thin,transitional B horizon over medium to large stream gravels. Reconnaissance transects were spaced at 10-20 meters and walked over the 20 acre tract. Reconnaissance Findinga Surface reconnaissance evaluations of the proposed Aspen Partners I,20 acre development in Gallatin County,Montana did not result in the location of any prehistoric . or historic culbzW resuu=sites. Two soil wounds were noted in the project area and according to former owner Millie McAfee,her father constructed theses soil piles in the 1940s while in the process of clearing cottonwood trees from the area as part of the • agricultural field development activities. • . � h. �� r.� r' � � ' . ��;c .. y ' `• � - ` ' � � � � � � r ' • .3 � � � v r '� • ` i .. . . � • • � , T 1• - � .� � � _ • 2 Recommendations File search and recotmaissaace evaluations did not result in the location of any prehistoric or historic cultural resource sites in the proposed Aspen Partners l project in Gallatin County,Mmtans.Project approval,in terns of cultural resotmce compliance,is. rcommmded with the provision that if buried cultural resource materials are found dunM construction,the catisultwg archaeologist will be notified to evaluate such findings. Larry A. Lalum Ph.D. Principal and Field Investigator April 19,2004 Agricultural Water Use THE LAW FIRIv1 M ORE, O'CONNELL & REFLING • A 13RC FESSIONAL CORPORATION LIFE OF MONTANA BUILDING,SUITE 10 601 HAGGERTY LANE PERR J.MOORE BOZEMAiN,MONTANA 59715 BARB G.O'CONNELL Reply to MAR D.REFLING P.O.BOX 1288 VVM.RUSSELL MCELYEq BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771-1288 CIND'E.YOUNKIN TELEPHONE:(406)587-5511 A LLAI q H.BARIS FAX: (406)587-9079 MICH AELJ.L.CUSICK E-MAIL: mor1aurG0gwesr..11ec JENN FER L.FARVE BART L.RICKENBAUGH(196(,2002) Se tember 2 , 2004 6 Ch is Saunders City of Bozeman Planning office y P.C. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 • RE: Annexation Criteria for Snowload, LLC Property on Bridger Drive Our file no: 86085\001 Dear Mr. Saunders : I represent Snowload, LLC concerning annexation of its property on Bridger Drive by the City of Bozeman. My clients have asked me to re iew ownership issues concerning an abandoned ditch that traverses an terminates on their property in the E% of the SE'/ of Section 32, To ship 1 South, Range 6 East . This property is proposed for an exation by the City of Bozeman. OnE of the conditions for annexation is that "the landowner shall agree to either provide easements to allow maintenance of. the on-site ditch or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the ditch is abandoned. " A physical inspection of the property indicates that the ditch has been filled in for several years.. The traces of the ditch that still remain to minate on my client' s property. I have enclosed a set of ph tographs showing the former course of the ditch across my client' s pr perty. The photographs show that the ditch is filled' in and no to ger useable. Chris Saunders Se tember 2, 2004 • Pac ge 2 The abandonment of this ditch is also evident in the water. .rights records on file with the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) . There are no water right claims on file with the DN111C that currently utilize this ditch to convey water. Water right 41 -W-115640-00, formerly used to irrigate land that is now the Headlands Subdivision., has been severed from the .Headlands property by reservations in the individual deeds to lots in the Headlands . As a result, the .water right is no longer used on or appurtenant to that property and cannot be conveyed through this ditch. Additionally, my client no longer intends to use the ditch to convey its water right, 41H-W-009018-00, to the property. In 1986 Snowload' s pr decessor Berl D. Hamilton obtained an authorization to change the point of diversion of this water right to abandon this particular ditch in favor of anew diversion from Bridger Creek on the north .end of the property. I have enclosed a copy of the relevant documents concerning Mr. Hamilton' s abandonment of this ditch. The. water right and deed records demonstrate that Snowload, LLC is the only party that still has an interest in this ditch, and'Snowload and its predecessors have abandoned this diversion and ditch for a more • direct point of diversion on the north end of its property. As a result, there are no parties with any easement rights associated with this abandoned ditch. Please let me know if this information satisfies the City' s concerns regarding this abandoned ditch for annexation purposes . Please feel free to call me if you have further questions or concerns . Sincerely, MI HAEL J. CU K • r l � M C/smk cc : Shaun Shahan (w/encl . ) Michael Promisco (w/encl . ) Enc . SKI584 .WPD r. t i�a:�''•-fir- x -�},>y Y e`t -'+-"` q+ep '.. t f > y A• c x A a r '3 c � k•. ,�k.. i r 4 t" ,,��Jet '� . i�• �)..,,�a'°a • � h`}y-<.. � �' zrnvoR •n'��yG• J'•S "'...:�..•s+,,,�S�z'�—' ^"7 -Rr. k' c d i .. �. a � '� r .i� Lei .a=� k�:��" c, >�„ �tc� ..,;,�•1•.� {- �� &•,•,: t�,' 'ter; ,� ..?� r. � t..,�., ti aka'. 11 ��7.4 .. Et�- ic, ♦ � C � ,, e'y?N'"�'� y .,�f.�..�,. '2,.1-rw-; , v ' rr k ,.� �,��s t •��r. i `° � }ysT�-'�: "S-may - •✓ � a�_ _� Y ><,. � aJ.- 8 T�rrr�.S v m-��-.rl..f � �._ a ci�c .x.`2a �,. '� - §• " F a 301, '?- �+.:.: • a,����'�' - i s' a,�w F;�J ~al ,��s ,,�. nos tk; �'F L�.*�� . . .. "L z . !;� C �, t�-� - 3 8i � -.•h {� C �J-spy{i� � 41 r, j�Z^. � ••� ��j� r;��r .c �. e^ yr r,.�"'`�aj.�..7��. �4.. a �j� �� .to Ci.. � .: �t� 1 a f. .di. � �,fi,�- `'•n�F�---, U � fr _ -rfs•�,.. � `"'ice vi?>+o' �' R g,a tamer r:U�,r: .�. W � J Y �' }' ..,l.. ycs {•f- �F�eyy',,+ 3k 3 -�2r•t 1 � 2 S �'��� ���'a:,j.T.,'r•- ire t �� '"' ,t...1 .. i 'f { it 1 )��yi• roar., N0. r2o n5iL:! _...aa C h: STATE OF MONTANAY" DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION r 32 SOUTH EWING HELENA,MONTANA 59620 Authorization To Change Appropriation Water Right PURSUANT TO SECTION 85-2-402 MCA, THE APILICATION. FOR CHAFE OP A.PPROPRIATlai WATER RIGHT SLBM=D CZJ MARCH 19, 1986 BY: , BERL D. HAMILTON 620 N. TRACY BOZ EMAN, MT 59715 IS HEREBY A.PPF.W D LIMECP ZD THE FC11,0 1M AU.T CRIZATICV: WATER RIGHT: STATEMIT OF CLAIM NUM3ER(S) W 009018-41H PRIORITY rATE: APRIL 1, 1882 SCURCE: BRIIGER CREEK POINT OF DIVERSION: NE94SA SEC. 33, T1S, ROE, GALLATIN COU11Y USE: MMATION **CHAIGE APPROVED: THE Y AUTHORMES THE CHAFE OF THE WATER RIGHT AS FCLLCWS: ZO CHAtGE THE POINT OF DIVERSION. NEW MINT OF .)IVERSION: WNESE SEC. 32, US, P6E, GALLATIr1 CJ]UNTY THIS A 370CRIZATICN 15 SUBJECT M THE EXLLORIN3 TM4S, OONDITIOI9S AND RESTRICTIONS. **FURT3ER INFORMAT1Xlcl: v,a ALL INTEREST INI THE OLD POINT OF DIVERSION (=RY MILL DITCH) IS ABANDONED AND i TRANSFERRED TD THE Wk NEC SEk OF SECTION 32, TCWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RAtGE 6 EAST, MPM, GALL.ATM GYJNPY, MWTAIFIA- **$H)UIR_ ERM FOR CFI UE HOLLER: THE DEAM NE FOR ODMILETICN.OF THE IUMCRIZED CHAFE AS SPECIFIED IN THIS AUTHORIZATION, AND FILIM OF THE NOTICE OF CI MILETICN OF .CHAFE OF APPFOPRIATIM WATER RIGHT (FORM 618) SHALL BE NWEM3ER 30, 1997- **O3N=IC)NAL APPROVAL: THE A RCVAL OF THIS CHANGE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS RECISNITION BY THE'DEPARTMENT OF THE WATER RIGHTS. nUC,VED, ALL RIOTS ARE SBJE.CT M P:SSIBLE'MODIFI.CATION UNDER THE PROCEEDIIMS PURSUANT TO TPILE 85, CHAPTER 2, PART 2, MCA, AND 85-2-404, Ma1. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH M TERMS AND. COMI "IMS'HEREIN MAY.RFSUL;T. IN..ME LOSS OF THE AUMCIRIZAMON TO CHATGE HEREBY GRANTED. •-4 07/25/86 /�t Z6�p - WITNESS WATER RE✓ DATE t V1 G i 7 . fI` .1:,✓ TES y _ �;'�^. ••` " • -ter.. . - . _. P.O.D. � S , ...w.�� �'vs.—• ��� � gyp'.: -a11:.S1 ., � _ •' a � � ' r, v �- �• 1 it NM�O r n � • ; y• �� '�. / .ear - y-, 1110 30 198,; IT 15 Yn� IuTevTlo To wa.Te✓ yet y 1nT See c/a/.., Y!N-w.00golP ao� To 'TY�Q new .dIVersIo�t �OINT IN NL Se .Sec 3Z .yC�rec K 4l' a 1 r M p c nlm No 7G cjt i,? Cl �' STATEMENT OF .CLAIM • ti FOR .EXISTING WATER RIGHTS For the Water G.ourts of the State .of'Nontana :1. .Owner ofwater-Right Co-owner,or Other InteresF.Owner. AcfcreS-. t.; . . •s.,. y 2. Person comple.ting:form c;4:✓or. `� ' .:Hume Pnone Nc ci;.st PhtJrll'aJt 3:'Name•of:ditch.creek;.or river jTc1t Use. iX irrigation,: 4: Method=of.Irrigation Use; F�c1i)cl S S..Soucce:of Waler - fChe h'Unty Onel `ll ..` ,,r!• We I I am S;rearn Name ,6'7l: �G.=h' :: £` kl ir.10ji w. ut. /r'ip'e.A.�. :..... .. . t L,iKo RI;IRte: SPrr,arsl t Tnbti:3t:y 61 Reservoir Name :Str.e+un, 1, Tributary of - 'Point of Diversion: County "r !!i. ;i, F h W .,/=s.a, S c ;•.,r Ji /. j ;a.., it e, 4' E..VJ 1 LU �IC)C'. 7Ur)C�I tit'-11,:11 ;1 7. Means of.Diversion: � r I'UIr1U t; uas::.. i It X Heacgat2 antic caVt u: ti r 1 Flood and d,k'r X t 9 8. Means of Conveyance: � Plr,tew,'. �...tYJ!lJf llllJJ"fl:.1J'!^lJ./✓tl1JJl^JJ1..rllf././Jl!!!.%.?'!lflllJlJJ�iI✓lylJJJ./l!llll�i✓�l.Il/Y' 11.iJt/.Jl•�T��113::'�5���'��CaJ"ll1'_�_�./':l.�r'-/yY✓:•Ji��-:•ECG�GS:.i_._::�_,',_....... � �.. • 9 Place of use and acre:illrgalaC. - o 'Total acres. 10. Flowrale.claimed: 11, Volume-claimed: 12. PePiod(s)ot'.use: 'MA 13. ChecK one: 'L "- •• � ,JseV.'rater;Rig- 14, Attach Re lt.) r:-01 FI:sIr;,,; Pluo; vl Jse "rc: 15..A I t a u h .z,.! I_:'canna jShUI!7)I,f, hS U S 6001104:Cd1 ;hl?;• .�.nr.. r,t.CI 7 SICr. "face.A use. {, G`,r,.nr tOr.cE, ,,n;j 4 r t =u:r:.. ';rli.'IE... , 1 t 16. Notarized Statement signed'by.ctairnant. �3 ATi:.CfF N10NTAN;r t - ol ��� ..Cr'. >li��°�/�f�/• elaVllr(; :)evr,.::.I r)• 5.:.:Ot'? !Jc'F 8C1 ;CI(I hula, the {I r SI,.'...' ;E,I: ;IS `tn .. :,i nli'i1•t, r, .U,.-1' .j:110 t.l '.Ills CIa1'„ 4-1 l I7 !I 11l1 It t' J 0 ll i, 1} �7JllIJIJ::�.'�'��:•�=%J���J ll/ll f.��:JJ_.•�./i>'%J�i�.=�l�'=•i�_i.�i-..IJ./lJl%����i�_iii�IJJJ�il� V7... - ;, ...ram•. .._. `.���,,, Ji q ku' r a . r .i E: STATE Gi RONTANA. DEPARTMENT OF-NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION' I AST•.;IUI7<;r Ui:...'G' f'.•NELEn:."I.:J:1'f Il : 'I.i: .... :ACKNOWI EDCE�I;E\,T OF NYATER,— GHT 'OWNERS:HtP U_PU.nTF: ".P.LEASE*NOTE'THAT'THIS'WATER.R'IGHT'IS'IN:'TEIA P0'RARY'PRELIM.INARY*DECREE`ISSUED BY THE WATER COURTS.' WE HAVE*RECEIVED A WATER.-RIGHT.OWNERSHIP U✓ATEANWHICH YO!'WERE NAMED.AS�A-PAR'TY:1'HE .'RECORDS MAINTAINED.BY THE WATER RIGHTS.BL;ii'_:AIJ A:T:.'CE[i:7: H'AJGED TG:REFLECT THE tdE, .::OWNERSHIP ACCORDING'TO THE WATER:RIGHT.O'.' 5RS9HIP UPCAi'c THE ABSTRACT DELCIA SHGPJS,FHE ' CURRENT WATER ..RIGHT .INFORMATION. BOTH 'BUYER AND: EL_EP,- HAVE. BEEN. .SENT' THIS ACKNOWLED.GENENT� IF YOU HAVE FURTHER'CUE .T.IONS:.PLEYZE-:CONTACT,-YOUR.LOCAL'.YJATER. . :RESOURCES.REGIONAL OFFICE . BO7_E11-IAN.RE.GICNAL OFFICE 406..586;:115m A%wer Right\umber: .41H.9018'001ST4TEMENT0 _,Aa! Version- 1--ORIGINAL RIGHT " .. Nutu,: ACTIVE r to ANNETTE JACOBS " 16570 BRACKET CREEK BOZEIAAW:l.TT 597;15 E29.2 I'Lulrin Date: 'APRIL 1.1882 .angn•;nlIliuoricaL.flight:.FILED- '` J'urpuscluicl: IRRIGATION) - .. . %fat im uul•I'hm,Rate: ..0:75 CFS %lat,intulu%.dunk:; A5.00 AC-FT Ni-imun. t;cet: 28.:00 Source: . Snuree-Wmc: BRIOGER'CRUL, •Source trpr: SURFACE WA ER P,•int of Dircrsiun-and\trans of 0i%emiuu: 1_D Corr Lot 111r�_1-.c NevJ, Is. ..-SE 1S 11h'.v..un deans: HEADGATE - Purpocr(I'el: IRRIGATION Irri-.anon'Type: FLOOD) l'limmic°:�rca:. 4,4,40DERATEL t. .. 45.00 AC-FT M..:•.4oRUse: MAY Io:AUGUSI 111 tern. t,tm I!n r�st•r I..J• 1 L8.U0 ._SE ,J'L 1 't:C -GAL LAIN. 1 J �• . U • •s)Uae 1n - NE,.:; TORAf.; ' ,••••";FILE Rc3;.ECTS AU.TMORVATION.TO CMANGE"POWI'."OF DIUERSION,COMP.LETED:UI.-LB-tlti ' . ;;OTICE.C:F3.JtTER•RIGHT:TRANSFER'.RECEIVED O51OB791' C C J 1 _1� :/�- f r . w#rye. ff t'�4 r '�••„ .4 ,i`st- -tip � _'�5.; _ w � t' -i.1.0 JJ:lI.., SSA Y'•` I• — ..Ki'`• 3+ _ t � r; . y. y4;r, f h 1 •etr is. • '� _ ;+t � - • rY " [ a Ct I ,..;'.ice �s`^`S•r••— .. .. • • J �. Water and Sewer Design Report r' DESIGN REPORT FOR THE WATER SYSTEM IN LEGENDS @ BRIDGER CREEK II BOZEMAN, MONTANA December 29, 2005 Prepared By: Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Boulevard P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1113 Engineers: Jim Ullman, P.E. Mike Smith, P.E. File: HA3959\00500CS\Design Report.doc Js • THE LEGENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II SUBDIVISION WATER SYSTEM DESIGN REPORT The proposed water system will have an internally looped 8 inch water main,with connections to the existing City of Bozeman's water distribution system. As shown in the Water Distribution Design section, adequate pressure and flow will be maintained during "Peak Hour"demand and"Maximum Day"demand combined with fire flow. WATER DISTRIBUTION DESIGN Introduction This report provides a basis for the design of the Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision water distribution system. The water distribution system serving the proposed project will be designed and installed in accordance with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality(MDEQ) Circular No. 1; Montana Public Works Standard Specifications (MPWSS); the City of Bozeman Modifications to MPWSS; City of Bozeman Water Facility Plan; and the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. In accordance with the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy this report is being submitted for approval,by the City of Bozeman,prior to plan and specification submittal. The applicant intends to utilize the self-certification process provided for in these design standards. Population Domestic water demand will be based on 126 living units and a club house, (assumed to be equivalent to one living unit in water usage), proposed as part of Legends II and 27 existing units, which extend along the south boundary of the project, that may connect to this system in the future. The City of Bozeman suggests, for design purposes, that each living unit will have 2.5 persons per unit, for a total population of 385 persons. Water Supply Water supply for domestic use, including landscape irrigation and fire protection, will be provided by the City of Bozeman via connection to the City of Bozeman's distribution system. An existing eight inch water main extends along Boylan Road to the west property boundary. In addition an eighteen inch transmission line extends from the Lyman Creek Reservoir through the project. Portions of the transmission line will be relocated to follow • the proposed alignment of Northview Street. wA looped eight inch water main is proposed for the project. This main will connect to the existing water main in Boylan Road and to the eighteen inch transmission line at the proposed intersections of; Boylan Road and Northview Street,Northview Street and Medicine Wheel Lane,Northview Street and Maiden Spirit Street,Northview Street and Midfield Street. (See attached Water Cad Map). The eight inch water main will also be stubbed to the east property boundary for future connection. The dead end lines needed for future connections will be less than 500 feet, and will end with a blow-off hydrant. A hydraulic analysis of the proposed water main extension was completed using WATERCAD, a water distribution model by Haestads Methods. Predicted Domestic Water Demand Water demand predicted for this project is based on the City of Bozeman criteria of 200 gallons per day,per person. This demand includes: This demand estimate includes: 1) Base Flow Water.. . • 2) Increased summer usage including lawn and garden irrigation, non- commercial car washing, cleaning sidewalks, and other miscellaneous metered uses. 3) Unaccounted for water usage such as street cleaning, hydrant flushing, sewer flushing, fire flows, flat rate accounts, leakage, and under registering meters. (See Water Facility Plan,pp. 18). Peaking factors used for design purposes are 2.5 for the Maximum Day Demand, and 3.0 for the Peak Hour Demand as suggested in the City of Bozeman's Design Standards and Specifications Policy March 2004—Section V. Utility Design Criteria, sub-section A, Water Distribution Lines Design Criteria, Paragraph 4,page 42. Based on this criteria the demands predicted for Legends II and the property along the south boundary are: Average Day Demand 385 persons x 200 gpd/person= 77,000 gpd or 53.47 gpm Maximum Day Demand (2.5 x Average Day Demand) 2.5 x 53.47 gpm= 133.67 gpm • Peak Hour Demand (3 x Average Day Demand) 3 x 53.47 gpm = 160.41 gpm Fire Flow The total water demand for the system includes the Maximum Daily Demand and the required fire flow of 1500 gpm as determined by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) criteria. The Maximum Daily Demand is calculated by multiplying the Average Daily Demand by a peaking factor of 2.5 as described above. The minimum pressure used for pipe main sizing was 35-psi during normal uses and no less than 20-psi during maximum day plus fire flow at any hydrant node. A "C" of 130 is used for the Hazen-Williams pipe roughness factor. Analysis The proposed water system will be modeled using the Water Cad (Cybernet) computer model. Input data will include the estimated demands, as detailed earlier in this report, and generated flows and pressures that the existing system will provide. The existing system data includes flow data from nearby fire hydrants. This flow data includes static pressure in the water system prior to flowing of a hydrant,residual pressure at this same hydrant while a hydrant nearby is flowing, and pito pressure or pressure at the hydrant that is flowing. Using the following formula a relationship between flow and pressure can be established: Qf= 29.873 x c x d2 x (p)0,5 and Qr=Qf x (hr/hf)0.54 Where: li' c=0.90 Qf=hydrant flow (gpm) d=outlet connection dia(in) hr= static pressure—req. residual pressure(psi) p=pito pressure (psi) hf= static pressure—test flow residual (psi) In order to dynamically model the pressure vs. flow relationship as inputs from the existing distribution system, a pump with a performance curve matching the fire flow capacity curve was inserted at the connection to the existing water main in Boylan Road. This method more accurately represents the real system. Static and residual pressure readings, flow data and locations of the fire hydrant near the point of connection is as follows, (this information can be seen in the Fire Hydrant Flow Capacities located in the Appendix): Flow data obtained from the existing hydrant includes supply from the Lyman Creek Transmission Line. To determine what impact the proposed connections to the transmission line would have on the flow data gathered at the existing hydrant, (less flow from Lyman Creek, additional flow from the remainder of the City's water system), the"North Zone" of the City's water system should be modeled. It was decided that is not necessary if a conservative approach was used in the • modeling process. This approach includes omitting supply from the transmission line. 1) Boylan Road and Pinnacle Crossing Street Hydrant Information: Pito Pressure 90 psi Static Pressure 120 psi, Residual Pressure 107 psi The following flow and pressure data calculated from the equations and hydrant information will be input in the computer model as points on a pump curve: 1) Static Pressure = 0 gpm @ 120 psi Fire Flow = 4797 gpm @ 20 psi Residual Flow = 1,594 gpm @ 107 psi Additional input data for the analysis includes;junction node elevations taken from Road Plans, a"C" friction factor of 130 as required by the City of Bozeman for modeling purposes, and appropriate minor losses for each pipe to account for fittings and valves. Results The model was "run" for two different scenarios. The first scenario modeled Peak Hour Demand, with the system maintaining pressure above the required minimum of 35 psi. The second scenario modeled Maximum Day Demand combined with Fire Flow requirements. Design Criteria The water main shall be Class 51 ductile iron pipe,buried to a minimum depth of 6.5 feet. Horizontal separation between water mains and sewer mains shall be 10 feet and a vertical separation for water main and sewer main crossings of 1.5 feet. Water main valves shall be installed at intervals of no more than 800 feet. Each leg of the water main system shall have a valve. Valves will be placed so that during shut down only one fire hydrant will be out of service at a time. Water services shall be standard size, type"K"copper pipe, installed in accordance with the City of Bozeman Standard Drawings for service lines. Summary • The computer model results verify that a looped 8-inch distribution main will supply the predicted domestic demand and fire flows for The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision. The Peak Hour Demand will be supplied with a residual pressure exceeding 35 psi and the required Maximum Day Demand with Fire Flow will have a residual pressure greater than 20 psi. The results also indicate that further development to the east can be supplied by connection to the proposed system. The Water Cad computer model "run"results are in the following Appendix. HYDRANT Q VS P RELATIONSHIP 0 December 23,2005 Pito Pressure(psi)= 90 Static Pressure(psi)= 1»20 • Residual Pressure(psi)= 107 Hydrant Flow(Qf)= 1594.13 (gpm) Pressure Drop Measured During Test(hf)= 13 (static pressure-test flow residual) Outlet Diameter(d)= 2:5 (in) hr= Pressure Drop to the Desired Residual Pressure(hf)=static pressure-required residual Qr=Flow available at the desired residual pressure Req.Residual(psi) Head ft hr(psi) Qr m 0.00 0.00 120.00 5293.60 10.00 23.10 110.00 5050.63 20.00 46.20 100.00 4797.26 30.00 69.30 90.00 4531.94 40.00 92.40 80.00 4252.67 50.00 115.50 70.00 3956.82 60.00 138.60 60.00 3640.78 70.00 161.70 50.00 3299.42 80.00 184.80 .40.00 2924.86 90.00 207.90 30.00 2504.03 100.00 231.00 20.00 2011.64 107.00 247.17 13.00 1594.13 110.00 254.10 10.00 1383.54 120.00 277.20 0.00 0.00 Hydrant Flow Capacity West Babcock & Ferguson Ave. 140 _ - ---- 100 - - Req. Residual 80 - Pressure (psi) 60 -- -- -- _ 40 =-----=- ------- -- - -- ----- .. . . _ 20 ------- .......... ---- - - ---------- 0 1 _ 1 i - 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Flow (gpm) • • .. • • .. 1 .. • �. • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flo Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-2 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-3 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-4 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-5 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-6 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-7 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-8 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-9 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 49.59 20.00 37.48 J-10 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-11 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-12 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-14 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-15 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-16 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 48.61 20.00 38.69 J-17 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-18 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-19 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 45.36 20.00 37.49 J-20 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-21 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-22, Zone:-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-23 Zone.-1 N/A false false 1,500.00. N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-24 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-25 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-26 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 37.88 20.00 31.23 J-27 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-28 Zone 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 33.08 20.00 28.13 J-29 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-30 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-31 Zone-1 3 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 26.18 20.00 22.88 J-32 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-33 Zone-1 4 true true 1,500.00 1,887.39 1,500.00 1,887.39 20.00 20.00 20.00 22.32 J-34 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-35 Zone 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 51.81 20.00 41.04 J-37 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-38 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-39 Zone- 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 48.92 20.00 37.88 J-40 Zone- 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 57.46 20.00 43.75 J-41 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-42 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-43 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-44 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-45 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-46 Zone- 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 35.83 20.00 34.87 J-47 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-48 Zone- 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 42.64 20.00 35.12 J-49 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-50 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-51 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20,00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-52 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 42.93 20.00 36.50 J-53 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:08:19 FMBentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report • Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flo Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-54 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-55 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 38.64 20.00 33.58 J-56 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-57 Zone-1 6 true true 1,500.00 1,983.39 1,500.00 1,983.39 20.00 20.91 20.00 20.00 J-58 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-59 Zone-1 3 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 27.14 20.00 25.63 J-60 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-61 Zone-1 2 true true 1,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 2,000.00 20.00 31.80 20.00 28.47 J-62 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-63 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-64 Zone-I N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-65 Zone-I N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-66 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-67 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-68 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-69 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-70 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-71 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-72 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A' J-73 Zone NiA false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-74 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A ..NIA N/A 20,00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-75 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A NIA N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-76 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-77 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A . 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-78 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-79 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-80 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-81 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-82 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-83 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-84 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-85 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-86 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-87 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-88 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-89 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-90 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-91 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-92 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-93 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-94 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-95 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-96 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-97 Zone-2 N/A false false 1.500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-98 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-99 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-100 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-101 Zone N/A false false 1,500*00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-102 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-1 031 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:08:19 FOA3entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 7 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report • Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flo Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-104 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-105 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-106 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-107 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-108 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-109 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-110 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-111 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-112 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-113 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-114 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-115 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-116 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-117 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-118 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-119 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-120 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-121 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-122 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 . N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-123 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 NIA 20.00 N/A J-124 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A NIA 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A: • J-125 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-126 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-127 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-128 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-129 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-130 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-131 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-132 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-133 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-134 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-135 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-136 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-137 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-138 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-139 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-140 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-141 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-142 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-143 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-144 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-145 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-146 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-147 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-148 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00. N/A 20.00 N/A J-149 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-150 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-151 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500,00 N/A N/A N/A 20,00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-152 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-153 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:08:19 FUBentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report • Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-154 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-155 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-156 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-157 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-158 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-159 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-160 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-161 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-162 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-163 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-164 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-165 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-166 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-167 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-168 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-169 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-170 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-171 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-172 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-173 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-174 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-175 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-176 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-177 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-178 Zone- e N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-179 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-180 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-181 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-182 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-183 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-184 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-185 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-186 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-188 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-189 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-190 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-191 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-192 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-193 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-194 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-195 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-196 Zone- e N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-197 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-198 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-199 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-200 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-201 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-202 Zone- N/A false false 1,500,00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20,00 N/A J-203 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-204 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0(07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:08:19 IOBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day 0 Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report • Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flovw Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-205 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-206 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J 207 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-208 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-209 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-210 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-211 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-212 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-213 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-214 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-215 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-216 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-217 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-218 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-219 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-220 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-221 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-222 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-223 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-224 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20:00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-226 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A .N/A N/A 20:00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-227 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-228 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-229 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-230 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-231 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-232 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-233 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-234 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-235 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-236 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-237 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-238 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-239 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-240 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-241 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-242 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-243 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-244 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-245 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-246 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-247 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-248 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-249 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-250 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-251 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-252 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-253 Zone- N/A false false 1,500,00 N/A N/A N/A 20,00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-254 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-255 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wed WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:08:19 FD Bentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report • Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flow Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-256 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-257 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-258 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-259 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-260 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-261 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-262 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-263 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-264 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-265 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-266 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-267 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-268 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-269 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-270 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-271 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-272 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-273 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-274 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-275 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-276 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • J-277 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 `N/A 20.00 N/A J-278 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-279 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-280 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-281 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-282 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-283 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-284 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-285 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-286 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-287 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-288 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-289 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-290 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-291 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-292 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-293 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-294 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-295 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-296 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-297 Zone-2 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-298 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-299 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-300 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-301 Zone-1 N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-302 Zone 4 true true 1,500.00 1,842.59 1,546.00 1,888.59 20.00 20.00 20.00 26.68 • J-303 Zone N/A false false 1,500,00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-304 Zone N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-305 Zone-I N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:08:19 FDA3entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 7 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report • Label Zone Fire Fire Flow Sat. Needed Avail Total Total Resid Calcul Min Calcul Flow Bal.? Fire Flow Fire Flo Fire Flow Flow Press Resid Zone Min Iterat Const.? (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Press Press Zone (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) Press (psi) J-306 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-307 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A J-308 Zone- N/A false false 1,500.00 N/A N/A N/A 20.00 N/A 20.00 N/A • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:08:19 FOBentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 7 10 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day. Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) Calculate ydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-2 4,730.35 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.54 110.41 J-3 4,730.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.54 110.17 J-4 4,729.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.99 J-5 4,726.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 111.94 J-6 4,723.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 113.45 J-7 4,735.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 108.26 J-8 4,726.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 112.24 J-9 4,726.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 112.24 J-10 4,728.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 111.07 J-11 4,720.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 114.53 J-12 4,716.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.88 116.55 J-14 4,728.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.60 111.45 J-15 4,728.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.57 111.44 J-16 4,730.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.54 110.56 J-17 4,730.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.54 110.56 J-18 4,731.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.54 109.91 J-19 4,733.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 108.91 J-20 4,733.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 108.91 J-21 4,733.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 108.91 J-22 4,733.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 109.25 J-23 4,734.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 108.46 J-24 4,736.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.48 107.81 • J-25 4,737.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 107.20 J-26 4,738.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.46 107.02 J-27 4,739.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,085.45 106.37 J-28 4,741.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 105.50 J-29 4,743.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 104.76 J-30 4,746.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.42 103.28 J-31 4,747.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.42 103.15 J-32 4,749.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.40 101.93 J-33 4,750.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.40 101.59 J-34 4,721.50 Zone-'1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.59 114.26 J-35 4,723.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.59 113.39 J-37 4,723.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.58 113.39 J-38 4,726.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.55 112.03 J-39 4,728.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.53 111.29 J-40 4,722.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.64 113.98 J-41 4,730.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.55 J-42 4,732.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 109.47 J-43 4,731.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 109.90 J-44 4,730.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.25 J-45 4,730.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.51 J-46 4,736.40 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 107.77 J-47 4,733.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 109.24 J-48 4,734.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 108.51 J-49 4,733.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 109.16 J-50 4,732.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 109.29 J-51 4,732.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 109.63 J-52 4,731.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 110.07 • J-53 4,739.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 106.59 J-54 4,740.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 106.12 J-55 4,738.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.48 106.86 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0(07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:16 F&Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 6 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated iydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-56 4,753.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 100.56 J-57 4,750.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 101.47 J-58 4,749.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 102.16 J-59 4,748.40 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 102.55 J-60 4,747.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 103.16 J-61 4,744.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 104.20 J-62 4,741.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.42 J-63 4,742.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.46 105.07 J-64 4,723.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.59 113.39 J-65 4,722.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.65 114.07 J-66 4,718.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.83 115.88 J-67 4,718.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.62 115.79 J-68 4,719.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.77 115.42 J-69 4,719.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.55 115.33 J-70 4,720.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.71 114.70 J-71 4,720.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.49 114.61 J-72 4,723.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.64 113.54 J-73 4,723.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 113.45 J-74 4,724.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.62 113.06 J-75 4,724.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.41 112.97 J-76 4,728.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 111.35 J-77 4,727.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.58 111.88 • J-78 4,721,00 Zone-2 Demand 0,87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.40 111.80 J-79 4,728.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.34 111.34 J-80 4,733.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.53 109.26 J-81 4,733.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 109.19 J-82 4,733.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.39 108.85 J-83 4,733.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.51 109.21 J-84 4,733.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 109.15 J-85 4,739.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.46 106.54 J-86 4,739.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 106.49 J-87 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.93 J-88 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.31 105.87 J-89 4,741.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.54 J-90 4,741.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 105.48 J-91 4,742.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 105.20 J-92 4,742.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 105.13 J-93 4,743.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 104.70 J-94 4,744.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 104.26 J-95 4,744.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 104.33 J-96 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 103.46 J-97 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.21 103.36 J-98 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.16 103.34 J-99 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.14 103.33 J-100 4,750.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.40 101.76 J-101 4,750.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.23 101.69 J-102 4.750.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.40 101.63 J-103 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.17 101.53 J-104 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.10 101.50 • J-105 4,750.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.12 101.47 J-106 4,750.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.23 101.69 J-107 4,721.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.59 114.13 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:16 FOMentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 6 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day• Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated lydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-108 4,721.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.46 114.07 J-109 4,721.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 114.04 J-110 4,722.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.59 113.74 J-111 4,722.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.46 113.68 J-112 4,722.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 113.64 J-113 4,722.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.43 113.58 J-114 4,722.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 113.56 J-115 4,723.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 113.30 J-116 4,722.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.59 113.65 J-117 4,724.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.57 112.87 J-118 4,724.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 112.80 J-119 4,724.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 112.78 J-120 4,725.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.56 112.47 J-121 4,725.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 112.39 J-122 4,725.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 112.39 J-123 4,726.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 111.96 J-124 4,726.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 111.94 J-125 4,726.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.55 112.03 J-126 4,727.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.53 111.60 J-127 4,727.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 111.53 J-128 4,731.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed' 0.87 4,985.44 110.00 J-129 4,731.20 Zone-2 Demand . 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.03 J-130 4,731.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 109.96 J-131 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 110.19 J-132 4,731.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 109.83 J-133 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 109.47 J-134 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.35 109.48 J-135 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.40 109.50 J-136 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 109.56 J-137 4,732.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.39 109.41 J-138 4,730.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 110.48 J-139 4,732.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 109.40 J-140 4,727.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 111.63 J-141 4,727.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.41 111.59 J-142 4,727.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.26 111.52 J-143 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.51 111.37 J-144 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.40 111.32 J-145 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.27 111.27 J-146 4,729.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.51 110.81 J-147 4,729.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.39 110.76 J-148 4,729.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 110.71 J-149 4,730.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.51 110.46 J-150 4,730.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.39 110.41 J-151 4,730.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 110.36 J-152 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.51 110.24 J-153 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 110.19 J-154 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 110.15 J-155 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 109.94 J-156 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 109.88 • J-157 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 109.85 J-158 4,732.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 109.57 J-159 4,732.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 109.54 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:09:16 FOVBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 6 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) Calculated iydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-160 4,732.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.34 109.22 J-1 614,732.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.26 109.18 J-162 4,732.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.21 109.16 J-163 4,733.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.32 109.08 J-164 4,733.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 109.17 J-165 4,735.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 108.20 J-166 4,735.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 108.15 J-167 4,735.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.26 108.10 J-168 4,735.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 107.99 J-169 4,735.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 107.93 J-170 4,735.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 107.89 J-171 4,736.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 107.68 J-172 4,735.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 108.20 J-173 4,721.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 114.19 J-174 4,721.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 114.14 J-175 4,723.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 113.45 J-176 4,723.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 113.41 J-177 4,725.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 112.58 J-178 4,725.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 112.54 J-179 4,726.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 112.28 J-180 4,726.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 112.24 J-181 4,726.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed, ' 0.00 .4,985.52 111.98 J-182 4,726,70 Zone-2 Demand 0,87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 111.94 J-183 4,727.40 Zone_2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 111.68 J-184 4,727.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 111.63 J-185 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 111.37 J-186 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.42 111.33 J-188 4,751.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 101.38 J-189 4,751.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 101.34 J-190 4,751.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 101.21 J-1 914,751.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 100.99 J-192 4,751.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 101.04 J-193 4,751.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 100.99 J-194 4,752.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 100.82 J-195 4,759.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 97.75 J-196 4,752.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 100.65 J-197 4,752.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 100.61 J-198 4,721.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 114.13 J-199 4,725.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 112.52 J-200 4,728.10 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 111.31 J-201 4,727.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.52 111.68 J-202 4,729.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 110.71 J-203 4,731.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 109.97 J-204 4,732.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 109.49 J-205 4,733.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 108.93 J-206 4,735.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.35 108.32 J-207 4,737.80 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 6.87 4,985.35 107.10 J-208 4,736.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.35 107.71 J-209 4,739.10 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.34 106.54 • J-210 4,740.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 106.12 J-211 4,742.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 105.10 J-212 4,741.80 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.46 105.42 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:16 FgGentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 6 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated dydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-213 4,742.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.33 J-214 4,744.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 104.20 J-215 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 102.89 J-216 4,747.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.27 103.09 J-217 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 102.88 J-218 4,748.90 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 102.27 J-219 4,749.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.27 102.09 J-220 4,750.70 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 101.50 J-221 4,752.80 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 100.58 J-222 4,751.90 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.25 100.96 J-223 4,751.90 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.27 100.97 J-224 4,751.10 Zone-3 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 101.32 J-226 4,729.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.77 J-227 4,731.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.51 110.03 J-228 4,732.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 109.55 J-229 4,733.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.50 108.98 J-230 4,735.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 108.38 J-231 4,736.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.49 107.77 J-232 4,737.80 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.48 107.16 J-233 4,739.10 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.48 106.60 J-234 4,740.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4.985.47 106.12 J-2354,742.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed. 0.00 4,985.47 105.16 J-2364,741,80 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.46 105.42 J-237 4,742.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.33 J-238 4,744.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 104.20 J-239 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 102.95 J-240 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 102.94 J-241 4,748.90 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 102.34 J-242 4,750.70 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 101.55 J-243 4,739.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 106.33 J-244 4,739.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.39 106.30 J-245 4,739.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.32 106.27 J-246 4,739.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.39 106.56 J-247 4.739.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.32 106.53 J-248 4,739.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 106.51 J-249 4,739.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.35 106.46 J-250 4,737.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 107.11 J-251 4,737.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 107.06 J-252 4,737.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.34 107.05 J-253 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.47 107.37 J-254 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 107.33 J-255 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 107.29 J-256 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.29 107.29 J-257 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 105.64 J-258 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.68 J-259 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 105.61 J-260 4,740.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 105.77 J-261 4,740.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.81 J-262 4,740.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 105.74 • J-263 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 105.90 J-264 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 105.94 J-265 4,740.63 Zone Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 105.86 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:09:16 FDvBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 6 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated lydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-266 4,740.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.37 106.03 J-267 4,740.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 106.07 J-268 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 105.87 J-269 4,740.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.38 106.16 J-270 4,740.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.45 106.20 J-271 4,740.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.30 106.13 J-272 4,746.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 103.42 J-273 4,746.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 103.39 J-274 4,746.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 103.35 J-275 4,745.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 103.64 J-276 4,745.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 103.60 J-277 4,745.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 103.57 J-278 4,745.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 103.90 J-279 4,745.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 103.86 J-280 4,745.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 103.83 J-281 4,744.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.44 104.11 J-282 4,744.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 104.08 J-283 4,744.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 104.04 J-284 4,744.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 14,985.44 104.37 J-285 4,744.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.36 104.34 J-286 4',744.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.28 104.30 J-287 4,749.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 102.25 J-288 4,749.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 '4,985.35 102.21 • J-289 4,749.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.26 102.18 J-290 4,748.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.42 102.42 J-291 4,748.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.35 102.39 J-292 4,748.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.25 102.34 J-293 4,748.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.42 102.64 J-294 4,748.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.33 102.59 J-295 4,748.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.25 102.56 J-296 4,747.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.42 103.02 J-297 4,747.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.35 102.99 J-298 4,747.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.24 102.94 J-299 4,730.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.53 110.55 J-300 4,730.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.87 Fixed 0.87 4,985.40 110.50 J-301 4,715.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.95 117.23 J-302 4,754.60 Zone-1 Demand 46.00 Fixed 46.00 4,985.39 99.85 J-303 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.43 103.46 J-304 4,728.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.60 111.45 J-305 4,732.55 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 109.45 J-306 4,730.88 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 110.17 J-307 4,727.14 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,985.52 111.79 J-308 4,727.14 Zone-1 1Demand 1 0.00 1 Fixed 1 0.001 4,985.521 111.79 • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959kOO5\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:16 f/Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 6 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg&Ipstream Struct wnstream Structu Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficieni (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-1 3,877.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Closed 0.00 5,016.00 4,985.54 0.00 0.00 P-2 41.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open 0.00 4,985.54 4,985.54 0.00 0.00 P-4 128.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 93.66 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-5 110.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 93.66 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-6 99.00 18.0 Cast iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 39.97 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-7 58.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 39.10 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-8 11.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 39.10 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-14 149.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 83.31 4,985.57 4,985.54 0.03 0.19 P-15 55.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.39 Open 0.00 4,985.54 4,985.54 0.00 0.00 P-17 21.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 83.31 4,985.54 4,985.54 0.01 0.28 P-18 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 43.10 4,985.54 4,985.54 0.00 0.06 P-20 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 42.23 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.06 P-21 13.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 52.16 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.08 P-23 127.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 50.43 4,985.50 4,985.49 0.01 0.08 P-24 126.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 68.70 4,985.49 4,985.48 0.02 0.14 P-25 113.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 53.84 4,985.48 4,985.47 0.01 0.09 P-26 33.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 53.84 4,985.47 4,985.46 0.00 0.10 P-31 8.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 51.21 4,985.42 4,985.42 0.00 0.12 P-32 230.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 51.21 4,985.42 4,985.40 0.02 0.08 P-39 22.00 8.0 Ductile Iro •130.0 false 0.39 Open 72.93 4,985.53 4,985.52 0.00 0.20. P-42 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro.: 130.0 false 0.39 Open -9.94 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-43 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0:39 Open -10.80 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 • P-47 174.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 20.73 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-48 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -18.62 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-50 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -22.61 4,985.49 4,985.49 0.00 0.02 P-51 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -22.61 4,985.49 4,985.49 0.00 0.02 P-52 104.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -23.48 4,985.49 4,985.50 0.00 0.02 P-53 87.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -24.35 4,985.50 4.985.50 0.00 0.02 P-54 84.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.95 4,985.50 4,985.50 0.00 0.02 P-72 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 85.95 4,985.65 4,985.64 0.01 0.23 P-73 275.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 85.95 4,985.64 4,985.59 0.06 0.20 P-74 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -6.08 4,985.59 4,985.59 0.00 0.00 P-75 19.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 79.88 4,985.59 4,985.58 0.00 0.26 P-76 56.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 176.21 4,985.88 4,985.83 0.05 0.87 P-77 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 175.34 4,985.83 4,985.77 0.06 0.82 P-78 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 174.47 4,985.77 4,985.71 0.06 0.82 P-79 62.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 173.60 4,985.71 4,985.65 0.05 0.83 P-80 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 87.65 4,985.65 4,985.64 0.02 0.22 P-81 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 86.78 4,985.64 4,985.62 0.02 0.23 P-82 88.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 85.91 4,985.62 4,985.60 0.02 0.21 P-83 90.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 85.04 4,985.60 4,985.58 0.02 0.19 P-84 72.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 84.18 4,985.58 4,985.57 0.01 0.19 P-85 151.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 43.10 4,985.54 4,985.53 0.01 0.06 P-86 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 42.23 4,985.53 4,985.52 0.00 0.06 P-87 85.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 51.30 4,985.52 4,985.51 0.01 0.08 P-88 149.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 50.43 4,985.51 4,985.50 0.01 0.08 P-89 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 53.84 4,985.46 4,985.46 0.00 0.09 P-90 36.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 52.97 4,985.46 4,985.45 0.00 0.09 • P-91 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 44.39 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.07 P-92 78.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 43.52 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.06 P-93 37.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 42.65 4,985.45 4,985.44 0.00 0.07 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.001 12/29/05 04:09:48 FR Bentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label 'Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg&1pstream StructLfizwnstream Structu @ressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficien, (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-94 41.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 42.65 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.07 P-95 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 41.79 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.06 P-96 91.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 39.56 4,985.44 4,985.43 0.00 0.05 P-98 60.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 5.21 4,985.40 4,985.40 0.00 0.01 P-99 42.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 3.47 4,985.40 4,985.40 0.00 0.00 P-1 OC 11.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 0.87 4,985.40 4,985.40 0.00 0.00 P-101 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.83 4,985.62 0.21 5.20 P-1 02 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.77 4,985.55 0.21 5.22 P-10 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.71 4,985.49 0.21 5.20 P-1 04 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.64 4,985.42 0.21 5.22 P-10E 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.62 4,985.41 0.21 5.20 P-10E 44.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.60 4,985.38 0.23 5.12 P-107 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.58 4,985.40 0.19 5.53 P-10E 46.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.57 4,985.34 0.23 5.04 P-10E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.53 4,985.37 0.16 6.08 P-11 C 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.39 0.14 6.79 P-1 11 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.38 0.13 6.96 P-1 12 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.46 4,985.33 0.13 7.13 P-11 22.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.31 0.14 6.50 P-1 14 23.00 0.8 Copper . 135.0 false 10.00 Open .0.87 4,985.45 4,985.30 0.15 6.39 P-11E 22.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.30 .. .0.14 6.50 P-11E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.30 0.14 6.65 • P-1 17 24.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.28 0.15 6.29 P-11E 42.00 0.8 Copper 135.0, false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.21 0.22 5.17 P-11 55.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.16 0.27 4.83 P-12C 61.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.14 0.29 4.71 P-121 30.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.40 4,985.23 0.17 5.76 P-122 47.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.40 4,985.17 0.24 5.02 P-12 59.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.40 4,985.12 0.28 4.75 P-124 65.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.40 4,985.10 0.30 4.65 P-12E 31.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.40 4,985.23 0.18 5.69 P-12E 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 0.00 4,985.59 4,985.59 0.00 0.00 P-127 77.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.74 4,985.59 4,985.59 0.00 0.00 P-12E 59.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 3.47 4,985.59 4,985.59 0.00 0.01 P-12 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 5.21 4,985.59 4,985.59 0.00 0.00 P-13C 52.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 79.88 4,985.58 4,985.57 0.01 0.20 P-131 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 78.14 4,985.57 4,985.56 0.01 0.19 P-132 85.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 76.40 4,985.56 4,985.55 0.01 0.17 P-13 87.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 73.80 4,985.55 4,985.53 0.01 0.16 P-134 28.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 72.93 4,985.53 4,985.53 0.01 0.19 P-13E 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.46 0.13 6.94 P-1 3E 40.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.38 0.21 5.25 P-137 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.46 0.13 6.94 P-1 3E 46.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.36 0.23 5.04 P-1 3E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.43 0.16 6.08 P-14C 44.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.36 0.23 5.12 P-141 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.59 4,985.38 0.21 5.22 P-142 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.57 4,985.42 0.15 6.17 • P-14 39.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.57 4,985.37 0.21 5.30 P-144 32.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.56 4,985.38 0.18 5.63 P-141 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.56 4,985.37 0.19 5.53 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:48 FUJBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 7 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day 101 Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg&1pstream StructLfi 3Dwnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficieni (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-14E 32.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.55 4,985.37 0.18 5.63 P-147 43.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.55 4,985.33 0.22 5.14 P-14E 33.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 0.84 4,985.55 4,985.55 0.00 0.00 P-14E 33.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.03 4,985.55 4,985.55 0.00 0.00 P-15C 27.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 true 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.53 4,985.37 0.16 5.99 P-1 51 59.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.3.9 Open -16.01 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.02 P-1 52 41.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -17.75 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-15 58.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -12.54 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-1 54 47.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -15.14 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-1 5E 22.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.38 0.14 6.53 P-1 5E 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.44 0.08 16.11 P-157 27.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.36 0.16 6.00 P-1 5E 28.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.36 0.17 5.89 P-15 17.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.40 0.12 7.35 P-1 6C 35.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.33 0.19 5.47 P-1 61 31.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.35 0.18 5.70 P-162 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.39 0.14 6.79 P-16 28.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.36 0.17 5.91 P-164 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.36 0.16 6.07 P-16E 71.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -39.10 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.05 P-167 66.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false .0.39 Open -37.37 4,985.51 4,985.52 0.00 0.05 P-16 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -35.63 4,985.51 4,985.51 0.00 0.04 • P-17C 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -33.89 4,985.51 4,985.51 0.00 0.04 P-171 76.00 8.0 Ductile fro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -30.42 4,985.50 4,985.51 0.00 0.03 P-172 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -32.16 4,985.51 4,985.51 0.00 0.03 P-172 74.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -28.69 4,985.50 4,985.50 0.00 0.03 P-174 36.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -30.42 4,985.50 4,985.50 0.00 0.03 P-17E 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -4.34 4,985.49 4,985.49 0.00 0.00 P-17E 36.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.87 4,985.49 4,985.49 0.00 0.00 P-177 82.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -2.60 4,985.49 4,985.49 0.00 0.00 P-17E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.38 0.14 6.63 P-17E 12.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.41 0.11 8.87 P-18 53.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.26 0.26 4.87 P-181 14.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.40 0.11 8.09 P-18 49.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.27 0.24 4.96 P-18 15.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.39 0.12 7.81 P-184 47.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.28 0.24 5.02 P-189, 16.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.39 0.12 7.54 P-18E 45.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.28 0.23 5.08 P-187 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.38 0.13 7.13 P-18E 42.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.29 0.22 5.17 P-18E 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.37 0.13 7.13 P-19C 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.29 0.21 5.22 P-191 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.36 0.14 6.63 P-192 40.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.29 0.21 5.25 P-19 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.34 0.15 6.17 P-194 49.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.26 0.24 4.96 P-19` 62.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.21 0.29 4.70 • P-19E 30.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.32 0.17 5.76 P-1 97 29.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.33 0.17 5.83 P-1 9q 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.36 0.13 6.96 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:09:48 FDA3entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 7 iScenario: Fire Flow+Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Dischargt pstream Struct wnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-19 45.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.26 0.23 5.08 P-20C 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.36 0.13 6.96 P-201 42.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.28 0.22 5.17 P-202 39.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.29 0.21 5.28 P-204 25.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -53.69 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-20E 58.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -51.96 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-207 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -51.09 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-20E 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -49.35 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-21 C 49.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -48.48 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.01 P-211 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -47.62 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-212 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -44.14 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-21 12 50.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -45.88 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-21 E 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -6.08 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-21 E 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -4.34 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.01 P-21 52.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -2.61 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-22C 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.00 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-221 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -1.74 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-222 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 9.91 P-222 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.38 0.14 6.65 P-224. 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 9.86. . P-22E 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 10.58 P-22E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open' 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.38 0.14 6.65 • P-227 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 10.58 P-22E 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 9.86 P-22E 31.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-231 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 10.58 P-232 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.42 0.10 9.86 P-23 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.38 0.14 6.65 P-23E 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -44.14 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.07 P-23 122.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -43.27 4,985.51 4,985.52 0.01 0.06 P-23E 91.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.41 4,985.50 4,985.51 0.01 0.06 P-23E 110.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -41.54 4,985.50 4,985.50 0.01 0.05 P-241 83.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -40.67 4,985.49 4,985.50 0.00 0.05 P-242 102.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -39.80 4,985.49 4,985.49 0.01 0.05 P-24 72.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -38.07 4,985.48 4,985.48 0.00 0.05 P-244 102.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -38.93 4,985.48 4,985.49 0.00 0.05 P-24 63.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -37.20 4,985.47 4,985.48 0.00 0.05 P-24E 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -38.07 4,985.48 4,985.48 0.00 0.05 P-24E 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -43.37 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.07 P-247 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.51 4,985.46 4,985.47 0.00 0.07 P-24_ 109.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -43.37 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.01 0.06 P-25C 20.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.51 4,985.45 4,985.46 0.00 0.07 P-251 124.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.51 4,985.46 4,985.46 0.01 0.06 P-25 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.41 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.06 P-252 34.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.41 4,985.44 4,985.45 0.00 0.07 P-254 82.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.41 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.06 P-25E 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -41.54 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.06 P-25E 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -42.41 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.06 • P-257 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -32.48 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.03 P-25E 100.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -33.35 4,985.43 4,985.44 0.00 0.03 P-25 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -31.61 4,985.43 4.985.43 0.00 0.03 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:09:48 IQ/Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control ischarg pstream StructLE mwnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficieni (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-26 35.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -32.48 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.04 P-261 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -7.82 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-262 123.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -8.68 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-26 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.52 4,985.38 0.14 6.67 P-264 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.51 4,985.37 0.14 6.65 P-26E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.37 0.14 6.79 P-26E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.50 4,985.36 0.14 6.79 P-267 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.35 0.14 6.65 P-26E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.49 4,985.35 0.14 6.65 P-26E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.48 4,985.35 0.14 6.79 P-27C 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.48 4,985.34 0.14 6.65 P-27 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.00 P-27 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.33 0.14 6.65 P-27 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,985.46 4,985.46 0.00 0.00 P-27d 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 P-27 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 P-27 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.30 0.14 6.79 P-27 28.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.27 0.17 5.89 P-27E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.29 0.14 6.65 P-27E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87- 4,985.43 4,985.29 0.14 6.65 P-28C 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.27 0.15 6.17 P-281 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.29 0.14 6.79 • P-282 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.33 0.10 9.91 P-28 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.29 0.14 6.79 P-284 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.33 0.10 10.58 P-28E 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.27 0.15 6.19 P-28E 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.33 0.10 9.86 P-287 32.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.25 0.18 5.63 P-28E 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.33 0.09 10.53 P-28E 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.33 0.09 10.53 P-29C 23.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.28 0.15 6.39 P-292 29.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -7.82 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-291 58.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 7.91 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.01 P-29 35.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.18 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.00 P-29E 43.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 9.65 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.00 P-29E 50.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 10.52 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.00 P-297 83.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 14.86 4,985.48 4,985.47 0.00 0.01 P-29E 73.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 12.25 4,985.47 4,985.47 0.00 0.01 P-29 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.39 0.08 16.02 P-30C 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.32 0.15 6.17 P-301 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.39 0.08 16.11 P-30 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.32 0.16 6.08 P-30 16.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.35 0.12 7.57 P-30i 14.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.36 0.11 8.09 P-30 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.34 0.14 6.79 P-30 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.38 0.10 9.86 P-30 35.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.28 0.19 5.47 P-30E 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.47 4,985.29 0.19 5.51 • P-31 C 37.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.10 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 P-311 52.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.64 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 P-31 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 3.38 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0(07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:09:48 R%iBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg pstream StructLE qDwnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficien, (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-314 50.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 5.11 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 P-31 E 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 8.58 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.01 P-31 E 60.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.85 4,985.45 4,985.45 0.00 0.00 P-317 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.37 0.08 16.02 P-31 E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.30 0.16 6.08 P-31 E 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.37 0.08 16.02 P-32C 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.30 0.16 6.08 P-321 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.37 0.08 16.02 P-322 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.30 0.16 6.08 P-32 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.37 0.08 16.02 P-324 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.30 0.16 6.08 P-32E 4.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.38 0.08 19.04 P-32E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.45 4,985.30 0.16 6.07 P-32E 39.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -7.33 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.00 P-32 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -5.59 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.00 P-331 48.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -3.85 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.00 P-332 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -2.12 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.00 P-3312 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.35 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.00 P-334 56.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.38 4,985.44 4,985.44 0.00 0.00 P-33E 5.00 0.8 Copper . 135.0 false 10.00 Open •:0.87 4,985.44 4,985.36 0.08 16.02 P-33 • 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 '. 4,985.44 4,985.28 0.16 6.07 P-337. 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0:87 4,985.44 4,985.36 0.08 16.02 • P-33E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.28 0.16 6.08 P-33 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.36 0.08 16.02 P-34C 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.28 0.16 6.08 P-341 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.36 0.08 16.02 P-342 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.28 0.16 6.08 P-34 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.36 0.08 16.02 P-344 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.44 4,985.28 0.16 6.08 P-34E 39.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -22.06 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.03 P-347 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -20.32 4,985.42 4,985.43 0.00 0.02 P-34E 43.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -18.59 4,985.42 4,985.42 0.00 0.01 P-34E 73.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -15.12 4,985.42 4,985.42 0.00 0.01 P-35C 66.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -16.85 4,985.42 4,985.42 0.00 0.01 P-351 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.35 0.08 16.02 P-352 27.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.43 4,985.26 0.16 5.99 P-35 4.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.42 4,985.35 0.08 19.04 P-354 31.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.42 4,985.25 0.18 5.69 P-35E 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.42 4,985.33 0.10 9.86 P-35E 30.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.42 4,985.25 0.17 5.76 P-357 4.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.42 4,985.35 0.08 19.17 P-35E 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.42 4,985.24 0.19 5.53 P-35E 182.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 40.21 4,985.54 4,985.53 0.01 0.05 P-36C 53.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 39.35 4,985.53 4,985.52 0.00 0.06 P-361 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.87 4,985.53 4,985.40 0.13 7.13 P-362 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.50 Open 176.21 4,985.98 4,985.95 0.03 1.06 P-36 80.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 176.21 4,985.95 4,985.88 0.07 0.83 P-364 178.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 46.00 4,985.40 4,985.39 0.01 0.07 • P-36 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 176.20 4,715.00 4,715.00 0.00 0.00 P-36E 140.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 38.70 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.01 0.05 P-367 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 36.09 4,985.43 4,985.42 0.00 0.05 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:48 IOBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 7 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg pstream Struchfi zwnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficieni (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-36E 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 2.60 4,985.43 4,985.43 0.00 0.00 P-36 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 0.39 Open 0.00 4,985.60 4,985.60 0.00 0.00 P-37C 174.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.05 Open 53.69 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-371 143.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.05 Open 53.69 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-372 135.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.05 Open 53.69 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-37 7.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.37 Open 53.69 4,985.52 4,985.52 0.00 0.00 P-371 61.00 18.01Steel 1 100.01 false 1 0.00 1 Open 1 53.691 4,985.521 4,985.521 0.001 0,00 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:48 RNBentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 7 • Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day • Fire Flow Analysis Pump Report • Label Elevation Control Intake Discharge DischargePump Calculated ' (ft) Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Water Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (ft) (Hp) PMP-14,715.001 On 1.,715.00 4,985.98 176.21 270.98 12.05 • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:09:59 R%/Bentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Fire Flow+Max Day Fire Flow Analysis Reservoir Report • Label Elevation Zone Inflow Calculated (ft) (gpm) ydraulic Grad (ft) R-1 5,016.00 Zone-1 0.00 5,016.00 R-2 4,715.00 Zone-1.176.20 4,715.00 • • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:10:09 RNBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 i • • • • • Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) Calculate ydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-2 4,730.35 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.36 110.76 J-3 4,730.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.36 110.53 J-4 4,729.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 111.34 J-5 4,726.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.29 J-6 4,723.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 113.81 J-7 4,735.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 108.62 J-8 4,726.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.60 J-9 4,726.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.60 J-10 4,728.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 111.43 J-11 4,720.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 114.89 J-12 4,716.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.63 116.87 J-14 4.728.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.41 111.80 J-15 4,728.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.39 111.79 J-16 4,730.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.36 110.92 J-17 4,730.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.36 110.91 J-18 4,731.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.36 110.26 J-19 4,733.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.27 J-20 4,733.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.27 J-21 4,733.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.27 J-22 4,733.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 109.61 J-23 4,734.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.83 J-24 4,736.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 108.17 • J-25 4,737.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 107.57 J-26 4,738.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 107.39 J-27 4,739.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.74 J-28 4,741.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.87 J-29 4,743.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.14 J-30 4,746.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 103.67 J-31 4,747.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 103.54 J-32 4,749.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 102.32 J-33 4,750.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.98 J-34 4,721.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 114.61 J-35 4,723.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 113.74 J-37 4.723.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.39 113.74 J-38 4,726.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.37 112.39 J-39 4,728.30 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 111.65 J-40 4,722.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.44 114.32 J-41 4,730.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 110.91 J-42 4,732.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.83 J-43 4,731.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 110.26 J-44 4,730.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 110.61 J-45 4,730.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 110.87 J-46 4,736.40 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.13 J-47 4,733.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 109.60 J-48 4,734.70 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.87 J-49 4,733.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 109.52 J-50 4,732.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 109.65 J-51 4,732.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 109.99 J-52 4,731.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 110.43 J-53 4,739.10 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 106.96 J-54 4,740.20 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 106.48 J-55 4,738.50 Zone-1 iDemand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 107.22 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:15:49 R Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 6 • Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated lydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-56 4,753.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 100.94 J-57 4,750.90 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.85 J-58 4,749.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 102.54 J-59 4,748.40 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 102.93 J-60 4,747.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 103.54 J-61 4,744.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.58 J-62 4,741.80 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.79 J-63 4,742.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 105.44 J-64 4,723.50 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 113.74 J-65 4,722.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.45 114.41 J-66 4,718.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.59 116.21 J-67 4,718.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.29 116.08 J-68 4,719.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.54 115.75 J-69 4,719.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.24 115.62 J-70 4,720.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.49 115.04 J-71 4,720.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 114.91 J-72 4,723.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.44 113.89 J-73 4,723.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 113.76 J-74 4,724.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.42 113.41 J-75 4,724.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 113.28 J-76 4,728.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4;986.09 .111.66 J-77 4,727.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 112.23 J-78 4,727.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 .4,986.13 112.11 J-79 4,728.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.06 111.65 J-80 4,733.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.61 J-81 4,733.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 109.52 J-82 4,733.80 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 109.18 J-83 4,733.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 109.57 J-84 4,733.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 109.49 J-85 4,739.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.91 J-86 4,739.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 106.84 J-87 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.31 J-88 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 106.22 J-89 4,741.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.92 J-90 4,741.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 105.83 J-91 4,742.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.57 J-92 4,742.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 105.48 J-93 4,743.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 105.05 J-94 4,744.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 104.61 J-95 4,744.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.70 J-96 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 103.84 J-97 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.00 103.71 J-98 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.93 103.68 J-99 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.90 103.66 J-100 4,750.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 102.15 J-101 4,750.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.06 102.05 J-102 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.30 102.02 J-103 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.97 101.88 J-104 4,750.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.88 101.84 • J-105 4,750.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.91 101.81 J-106 4,750.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.05 102.04 J-107 4,721.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 114.48 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:15:49 t&Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 6 • Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) Calculate ydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-108 4,721.80 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 114.40 J-109 4,721.80 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 114.35 J-110 4,722.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 114.09 J-111 4,722.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 114.01 J-112 4,722.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.07 113.95 J-113 4,722.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 113.91 J-114 4,722.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 113.87 J-115 4,723.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 113.61 J-116 4,722.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.40 114.00 J-117 4,724.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.39 113.22 J-118 4,724.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 113.12 J-119 4,724.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 113.09 J-120 4,725.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.38 112.83 J-121 4,725.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 112.72 J-122 4,725.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 112.71 J-123 4,726.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 112.28 J-124 4,726.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.05 112.25 J-125 4,726.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.37 112.39 J-126 4,727.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 111.95 J-127 4,727.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 111.85 J-128 4,731.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.23 110.34 J-1.29 4,731.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed. 0.00 4,986.35 110.39 • J-130 4,731.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 110.29 J-131 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 110.52 J-132 4,731.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 110.16 J-133 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 109.80 J-134 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 109.81 J-135 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 109.84 J-136 4,732.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.91 J-137 4,732.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 109.74 J-138 4,730.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 110.81 J-139 4,732.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 109.73 J-140 4,727.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 111.99 J-141 4,727.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 111.92 J-142 4,727.50 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.98 111.83 J-143 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 111.73 J-144 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.18 111.66 J-145 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.00 111.58 J-146 4,729.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 111.17 J-147 4,729.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 111.09 J-148 4,729.40 Zone-2 Demand. 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.01 111.02 J-149 4,730.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 110.82 J-150 4,730.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 110.74 J-1 514,730.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.02 110.68 J-152 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 110.60 J-153 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986,15 110.52 J-154 4,730.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.03 110.47 J-155 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 110.30 J-156 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1:04 4,986.15 110.22 • J-157 4,731.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.03 110.17 J-158 4,732.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.14 109.91 J-159 4,732.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.04 109.87 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:15:49 IOuBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 6 Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated dydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-160 4,732.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 109.55 J-161 4,732.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.99 109.50 J-162 4,732.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,985.92 109.47 J-163 4,733.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 109.41 J-164 4,733.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 109.50 J-165 4,735.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.57 J-166 4,735.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.14 108.48 J-167 4,735.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.01 108.43 J-168 4,735.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.35 J-169 4,735.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.14 108.27 J-170 4,735.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.02 108.22 J-1 714,736.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.04 108.01 J-172 4,735.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 108.53 J-173 4,721.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 114.54 J-174 4,721.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 114.48 J-175 4,723.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 113.81 J-176 4,723.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 113.75 J-177 4,725.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.94 J-178 4,725.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 112.88 J-179 4,726.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.64 J-180 4,726.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 112.58 J-181 4,726.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.34 • J-182 4,726.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 112.28 J-183 4,727.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.03 J-184 4,727.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 111.97 J-185 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 111.73 J-186 4,728.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 111.67 J-188 4,751.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.76 J-189 4,751.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 101.70 J-190 4,751.50 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.59 J-191 4,751.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 101.36 J-192 4,751.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.42 J-193 4,751.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 101.35 J-194 4,752.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.20 J-195 4,759.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 98.11 J-196 4,752.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.03 J-197 4,752.80 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 100.97 J-198 4,721.60 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 114.46 J-199 4,725.30 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 112.86 J-200 4,728.10 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 111.64 J-201 4,727.40 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.35 112.03 J-202 4,729.50 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 111.04 J-203 4,731.20 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.14 110.30 J-204 4,732.30 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.14 109.83 J-205 4,733.60 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.14 109.26 J-206 4,735.00 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 108.65 J-207 4,737.80 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 107.44 J-208 4,736.40 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 108.05 J-209 4,739.10 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 106.88 • J-210 4,740.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 106.48 J-211 4,742.40 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 105.45 J-212 4,741.80 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.79 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:15:49 FIJBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 6 Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) Calculate ydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-213 4,742.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 . 4,986.31 105.70 J-214 4,744.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.58 J-215 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.12 103.24 J-216 4,747.00 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.07 103.44 J-217 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 103.23 J-218 4,748.90 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 102.63 J-219 4,749.30 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 102.45 J-220 4,750.70 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 101.85 J-221 4,752.80 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 100.94 J-222 4,751.90 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.05 101.31 J-223 4,751.90 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 101.32 J-224 4,751.10 Zone-3 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.11 101.68 J-226 4,729.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 111.12 J-227 4,731.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 110.39 J-228 4,732.30 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.34 109.91 J-229 4,733.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 109.35 J-230 4,735.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.74 J-231 4,736.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 108.13 J-232 4,737.80 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.33 107.53 J-233 4,739.10 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 106.96 J-234 4,740.20 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 •4,986.32 106.48 J-235 4,742.40 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 105.53 • J-2364,741,80 Zone-3 Demand 0,00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.79 J-237 4,742.00 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 105.70 J-238 4,744.60 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.58 J-239 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 103.32 J-240 4,747.50 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 103.32 J-241 4,748.90 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 102.71 J-242 4,750.70 Zone-3 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 101.93 J-243 4,739.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 106.70 J-244 4,739.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 106.65 J-245 4,739.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 106.61 J-246 4,739.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.21 106.91 J-247 4,739.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.10 106.86 J-248 4,739.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 106.87 J-249 4,739.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.15 106.80 J-250 4,737.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 107.48 J-251 4,737.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 107.41 J-252 4,737.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.13 107.40 J-253 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.32 107.74 J-254 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.18 107.68 J-255 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.05 107.62 J-256 4,737.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.06 107.63 J-257 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 106.00 J-258 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.05 J-259 4,741.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 105.95 J-260 4,740.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 106.13 J-261 4,740.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.18 J-262 4,740.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 106.08 • J-263 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 106.26 J-264 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.31 J-265 4,740.63 Zone Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 106.20 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0(07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:15:49 FOJBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 6 • Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Junction Report • Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated lydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-266 4,740.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 106.39 J-267 4,740.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.44 J-268 4,740.60 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 106.21 J-269 4,740.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 106.52 J-270 4,740.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 106.57 J-271 4,740.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.09 106.47 J-272 4,746.40 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 103.80 J-273 4,746.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 103.75 J-274 4,746.40 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 103.70 J-275 4,745.90 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.01 J-276 4,745.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 103.96 J-277 4,745.90 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 103.92 J-278 4,745.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.27 J-279 4,745.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 104.22 J-280 4,745.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 104.18 J-281 4,744.80 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.49 J-282 4,744.80 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 104.44 J-283 4,744.80 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 104.39 J-284 4,744.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 104.75 J-285 4,744.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 104.70 J-286 4,744.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 104.65 J-287 4,749.10 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 102.63 • J-2881,749.10 Zone-2 Demand 1,04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.19 102.58 J-289 4,749.10 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.08 102.53 J-290 4,748.70 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 102.80 J-291 4,748.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 102.75 J-292 4,748.70 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.06 102.69 J-293 4,748.20 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 103.02 J-294 4,748.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.16 102.96 J-295 4,748.20 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.06 102.91 J-296 4,747.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 103.41 J-297 4,747.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.20 103.36 J-298 4,747.30 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.04 103.29 J-299 4,730.00 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 110.91 J-300 4,730.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.17 110.83 J-301 4,715.00 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.68 117.55 J-302 4,754.60 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.30 100.25 J-303 4,746.30 Zone-2 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.31 103.84 J-304 4,728.00 Zone-2 Demand 1.04 Fixed 1.04 4,986.31 111.76 J-305 4,732.55 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 109.81 J-306 4,730.88 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 110.53 J-307 4,727.14 Zone-1 Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 4,986.35 112.15 J-308 4,727.14 Zone-1 1Demand 10.00 1 Fixed 1 0.001 4,986.351 112.15 • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.001 12/29/05 04:15:49 FOBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 6 • • • a • 10 Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg&1pstream Structtiftwnstream Structu Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficieni (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-1 3,877.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Closed 0.00 5,016.00 4,986.36 0.00 0.00 P-2 41.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open 0.01 4,986.36 4,986.36 0.00 0.00 P-4 128.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 79.05 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-5 110.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 79.05 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 P-6 99.00 18.0 Cast iron 130.0 false 0.00 Open 34.15 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-7 58.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 33.11 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-8 11.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.00 Open 33.11 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-14 149.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 71.40 4,986.39 4,986.36 0.02 0.15 P-15 55.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.39 Open 0.00 4,986.36 4,986.36 0.00 0.00 P-17 21.00 .8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 71.40 4,986.36 4,986.36 0.00 0.19 P-18 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 36.50 4,986.36 4,986.36 0.00 0.06 P-20 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 35.46 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.06 P-21 13.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 40.68 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.04 P-23 127.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 38.60 4,986.34 4,986.33 0.01 0.05 P-24 126.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 46.73 4,986.33 4,986.32 0.01 0.07 P-25 113.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 34.11 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.03 P-26 33.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 34.11 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.04 P-31 8.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.25 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-32 230.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.25 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-39 22.00 8.0 Ductile Iro: 130.0 false 0.39 Open 60.83 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.1.3 P-42 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -5.22 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-43 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iro• 130.0 false 0.39 Open -6.26 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 • P-47 174.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 18.22 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 P-48 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -15.63 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 P-50 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -13.33 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.00 P-51 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -13.33 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.01 P-52 104.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -14.37 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.01 P-53 87.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -15.41 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.01 P-54 84.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -18.53 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.01 P-72 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 76.45 4,986.45 4,986.44 0.01 0.18 P-73 275.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 76.45 4,986.44 4,986.40 0.04 0.16 P-74 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -7.29 4,986.40 4,986.40 0.00 0.00 P-75 19.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 69.16 4,986.40 4,986.39 0.00 0.18 P-76 56.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 157.21 4,986.63 4,986.59 0.04 0.71 P-77 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 156.17 4,986.59 4,986.54 0.05 0.67 P-78 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 155.13 4,986.54 4,986.49 0.05 0.66 P-79 62.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 154.09 4,986.49 4,986.45 0.04 0.67 P-80 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 77.64 4,986.45 4,986.44 0.01 0.18 P-81 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 76.60 4,986.44 4,986.42 0.01 0.18 P-82 88.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 75.56 4,986.42 4,986.41 0.02 0.17 P-83 90.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 73.48 4,986.41 4,986.40 0.01 0.15 P-84 72.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 72.44 4,986.40 4,986.39 0.01 0.14 P-85 151.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 36.50 4,986.36 4,986.35 0.01 0.04 P-86 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 35.46 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.04 P-87 85.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 39.64 4,986.35 4,986.34 0.00 0.05 P-88 149.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 38.60 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.01 0.05 P-89 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 34.11 4,986.32 4,986.31 0.00 0.04 P-90 36.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 33.07 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.04 • P-91 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 25.40 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-92 78.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 24.36 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-93 37.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 23.32 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.03 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:16:06 FQ6entley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 7 • Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control ischarg pstream StructLf 3Dwnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-94 41.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 23.32 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-95 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 22.28 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-96 91.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 16.18 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 P-98 60.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.25 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.01 P-99 42.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 4.16 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-10C 11.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-101 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.59 4,986.29 0.30 7.36 P-102 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.54 4,986.24 0.30 7.35 P-10Z 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.49 4,986.19 0.30 7.35 P-104 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.44 4,986.13 0.30 7.36 P-10E 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.42 4,986.12 0.30 7.36 P-10E 44.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.41 4,986.09 0.32 7.20 P-10/ 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.13 0.27 7.80 P-10E 46.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.39 4,986.06 0.33 7.12 P-10E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false .10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.13 0.22 8.60 P-1 1C 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.16 0.19 9.62 P-1 11 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,686.34 4,986.16 0.19 9.84 P-1 12 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.13 0.18 10.12 P-11 22.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.11 0.20 9.23 P-1 14 23.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986:10 0.21 9.07 P-1 1E 22.00 0.8 Copper'. 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.11 0.20 9.21 P-11E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.11 0.20 9.42 • P-117 24.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.09 0.21 8.89 P-11E 42.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.00 0.31 7.30 P-11E 55.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,985.93 0.37 6.80 P-12C 61.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,985.90 0.41 6.64 P-121 30.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.06 0.24 8.14 P-122 47.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,985.97 0.33 7.07 P-12 59.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,985.91 0.40 6.70 P-124 65.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,985.88 0.43 6.55 P-12E 31.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.05 0.25 8.05 P-12E 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.00 4,986.40 4,986.40 0.00 0.00 P-127 77.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 2.09 4,986.40 4,986.40 0.00 0.00 P-12E 59.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 4.17 4,986.40 4,986.40 0.00 0.00 P-12E 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.25 4,986.40 4,986.40 0.00 0.00 P-13C 52.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 69.16 4,986.39 4,986.39 0.01 0.16 P-131 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 67.07 4,986.39 4,986.38 0.01 0.14 P-132 85.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 64.99 4,986.38 4,986.37 0.01 0.13 P-13 87.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 61.87 4,986.37 4,986.35 0.01 0.12 P-1 34 28.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 60.83 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.14 P-1 3E 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.21 0.19 9.87 P-1 3E 40.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.10 0.30 7.41 P-13/ 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.21 0.19 9.87 P-13E 46.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.07 0.33 7.12 P-13E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.17 0.22 8.60 P-14C 44.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.08 0.32 7.21 P-141 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.40 4,986.10 0.30 7.35 P-142 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.39 4,986.17 0.22 8.73 • P-142 39.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.39 4,986.09 0.29 7.46 P-144 32.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.38 4,986.12 0.25 7.97 P-141 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.38 4,986.11 0.27 7.80 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:16:06 FUJBentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diametei Material Hazen- Check Minor Control ischarg pstream Struct wnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-14E 32.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.37 4,986.11 0.25 7.97 P-147 43.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.37 4,986.05 0.31 7.26 P-14E 33.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.03 4,986.37 4,986.37 0.00 0.00 P-14 33.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.01 4,986.37 4,986.37 0.00 0.00 P-1 5C 27.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 true 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.13 0.23 8.48 P-1 51 59.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -12.51 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-1 52 41.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -14.59 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 P-15 58.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -8.35 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-1 54 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -11.47 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 P-15` 22.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.15 0.20 9.23 P-1 5E 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.23 0.11 22.95 P-15/ 27.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.12 0.23 8.46 P-1 5E 28.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.11 0.23 8.37 P-1 5E 17.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.17 0.18 10.40 P-16C 35.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.08 0.27 7.73 P-161 31.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.10 0.25 8.05 P-162 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.16 0.19 9.64 P-16 28.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.11 0.23 8.37 P-164 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.12 0.22 8.60 • P-16E 71.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open. -33:11 .4,986.34 4,986.35 0.00 0.03 P-1 67 66.O0 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 31.03 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 .0.04 P-16E 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -28.94 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 0,.03 • P-1 7C 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.86 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 0.02 P-1 71 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -22.70 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 0.02 P-172 61.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -24.78 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 0.02 P-17 74.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -20.62 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.01 P-1 74 36.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -22.70 4,986.33 4,986.34 0.00 0.01 P-1 7E 68.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -5.20 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.00 P-1 79, 36.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -1.04 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.00 P-1 77 82.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -3.12 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.00 P-17E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.15 0.20 9.42 P-1 7E 12.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.19 0.15 12.61 P-18C 53.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,985.98 0.36 6.86 P-181 14.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.18 0.16 11.51 P-182 49.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,985.00 0.34 7.00 P-18 15.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.17 0.17 11.10 P-184 47.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.01 0.33 7.07 P-18c, 16.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.17 0.17 10.74 P-18E 45.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.02 0.32 7.16 P-187 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.15 0.18 10.12 P-18E 42.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.03 0.31 7.30 P-18E 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.15 0.18 10.12 P-19C 41.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.03 0.30 7.36 P-191 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.14 0.20 9.42 P-192 40.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.04 0.30 7.41 P-19 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.11 0.22 8.75 P-194 49.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,985.99 0.34 7.01 P-1 9E 62.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,985.92 0.41 6.62 • P-1 9E 30.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.09 0.24 8.15 P-1 97 29.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.09 0.24 8.25 P-1 9E 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.14 0.19 9.87 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:16:06 RM/Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length iameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg pstrearn Struct wnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C Coefficieni (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-1 9E 45.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.01 0.32 7.16 P-20C 19.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.14 0.19 9.87 P-201 42.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.02 0.31 7.31 P-202 39.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.04 0.29 7.47 P-204 25.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -44.91 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-20E 58.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -42.82 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-207 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -41.78 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-20E 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -39.70 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-21 C 49.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -38.66 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.01 P-21 1 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -37.62 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-212 51.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -33.45 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-21 50.00 18.0 Cast iron 100.0 false 0.39 Open -35.54 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-21 E 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -7.29 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.01 P-21 E 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -5.21 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-21 E 52.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -3.13 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-22C 24.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.00 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-221 49.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -2.09 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-222 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.21 0.14 14.06 P-22 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.15 0.20 9.42 P-224 10.00 0.8 Copper' 135.0 false .10.00 Open 1.04 .4,986.35 4,986.21 0.14 14.06 P-22E 9.00 0.8 Copper. '135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.21 0.14 15.08 P-22E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986'.1'5 0.20 9.42 • P-227 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.21 0.14 15.08 P-22E 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.20 0.14 14.06 P-22 31.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-231 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.21 0.14 15.03 P-232 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.20 0.14 14.06 P-232 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.15 0.20 9.42 P-23E 46.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -33.45 4,986.34 4,986.35 0.00 0.04 P-23E 122.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -32.41 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 0.03 P-23E 91.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -31.37 4,986.34 4,986.34 0.00 0.03 P-23E 110.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -30.33 4,986.33 4,986.34 0.00 0.03 P-241 83.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -29.29 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.03 P-242 102.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -28.25 4,986.33 4,986.33 0.00 0.03 P-24 72.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.17 4,986.32 4,985.33 0.00 0.02 P-244 102.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -27.21 4,986.33 4,985.33 0.00 0.02 P-24 63.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -25.13 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.62 P-24E 47.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.17 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.03 P-24E 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -27.33 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.02 P-247 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.29 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.03 P-24E 109.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -27.33 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.03 P-25C 20.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.28 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.05 P-251 124.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -26.29 4,986.31 4,986.32 0.00 0.02 P-2512 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -23.54 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-252 34.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -23.53 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.03 P-254 82.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -23.54 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-25E 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -22.49 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 P-25E 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -23.53 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.02 • P-257 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -15.06 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 P-25E 100.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -16.10 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 P-25q 76.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -14.02 4,986.30 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:16:06 FU Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control ischarg pstream Struct wnstream Structu @ressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-26 35.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -15.06 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 P-261 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -9.37 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-262 123.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -10.41 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-26 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.15 0.20 9.39 P-264 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.14 0.20 9.42 P-26E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.34 4,986.14 0.19 9.64 P-26E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.14 0.19 9.62 P-267 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.13 0.20 9.42 P-26E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.13 0.20 9.42 P-26 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.33 4,986.13 0.19 9.62 P-27C 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.12 0.20 9.42 P-271 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.00 P-27 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.12 0.20 9.42 P-27 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-274 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-27E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 0.00 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-27E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.12 0.19 9.62 P-277 28.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.07 0.23 8.35 P-27f 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.11 0.20 9.42 P-27E 21.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.11 0.20 9.42 P-28C 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.09 0.22 8.73 P-281 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.11 0.19 9.62 • P-282 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.16 0.14 14.11 P-28 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.11 0.19 9.64 P-284 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.17 0.14 15.03 P-28E 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.09 0.22 8.73 P-28E 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.16 0.14 14.06 P-28/ 32.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.05 0.25 7.97 P-28E 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.17 0.14 15.03 P-28E 9.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.17 0.14 15.03 P-29C 23.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.10 0.21 9.04 P-292 29.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -9.37 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-291 58.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 4.29 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.01 P-29 35.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 2.20 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.00 P-29E 43.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 6.37 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.00 P-29E 50.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 7.41 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.00 P-2977 83.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 12.61 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.01 P-29E 73.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 9.49 4,986.32 4,986.32 0.00 0.00 P-29E 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.21 0.11 22.85 P-30C 25.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.10 0.22 8.73 P-301 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.21 0.11 22.95 P-302 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.10 0.22 8.62 P-30 16.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.15 0.17 10.74 P-304 14.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.16 0.16 11.54 P-30E 20.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.13 0.19 9.62 P-30E 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.18 0.14 14.06 P-30 35.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.05 0.27 7.71 P-30E 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.32 4,986.06 0.27 7.80 • P-31 C 37.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -2.74 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-311 52.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.66 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-31 1 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.42 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00) 12/29/05 04:16:06 F*Bentley Systems,Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 5 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control ischarg pstream Structdizwnstream Structui Pressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-314 50.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 3.50 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-31 E 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 7.67 4,686.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-31 E 60.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 5.58 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 P-317 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.20 0.11 22.95 P-31 E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.09 0.22 8.60 P-31 E 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.20 0.11 22.95 P-32C 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.09 0.22 8.60 P-321 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.20 0.11 22.95 P-322 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.09 0.22 8.60 P-32 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.20 0.11 22.85 P-324 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.09 0.22 8.60 P-32E 4.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.20 0.11 27.47 P-32E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.09 0.22 8.62 P-32E 39.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -5.35 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-32E 54.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -3.27 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-331 48.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -1.18 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-33 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 0.90 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-33 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 5.06 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-331 56.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 2.98 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-33 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open .1.04 4,986.31 4,986.19 0.11 22.95 P-33 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false .10.00 Open 1..04 4,986.31 4,986.08 0.22 8.60' P-33 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.19 0.11 22.95 • P-33E 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.08 0.22 8.60 P-33 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.19 0.11 22.95 P-34C 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.08 0.22 8.60 P-341 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.19 0.11 22.95 P-342 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.08 0.22 8.60 P-34 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.19 0.11 22.95 P-344 26.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.31 4,986.08 0.22 8.60 P-34E 39.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -2.57 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-347 64.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open -0.48 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-34 43.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 1.60 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-34E 73.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 5.76 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-35C 66.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 3.68 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 P-351 5.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.19 0.11 22.95 P-352 27.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.08 0.23 8.48 P-35 4.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.20 0.11 27.34 P-354 31.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.06 0.25 8.05 P-35 10.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.16 0.14 14.06 P-35E 30.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.06 0.24 8.15 P-357 4.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.20 0.11 27.34 P-35E 34.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.30 4,986.04 0.27 7.80 P-35 182.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 34.90 4,986.36 4,986.35 0.01 0.04 P-36C 53.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 33.86 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.04 P-361 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 10.00 Open 1.04 4,986.35 4,986.17 0.18 10.12 P-362 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.50 Open 157.21 4,986.71 4,986.68 0.03 0.86 P-36 80.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 157.21 4,986.68 4,986.63 0.05 0.67 P-364 178.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 0.00 4,986.30 4,986.30 0.00 0.00 • P-36E 1.00 48.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 157.21 4,715.00 4,715.00 0.00 0.00 P-36E 140.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 15.14 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.01 P-367 51.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 12.01 4,986.31 4,986.30 0.00 0.01 Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:16:06 R2VBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 6 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Pipe Report • Label Length Diameter Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Discharg&1pstream Struct wnstream Structui @ressure Headloss (ft) (in) William Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Headlos (ft/1000ft) (ft) P-36f 23.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.39 Open 3.12 4,986.31 4,986.31 0.00 0.00 P-36 18.00 0.8 Copper 135.0 false 0.39 Open 1.04 4,986.41 4,986.31 0.10 5.37 P-37C 174.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.05 Open 44.91 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-371 143.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.05 Open 44.91 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-372 135.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.05 Open 44.91 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-37 7.00 18.0 Steel 100.0 false 0.37 Open 44.91 4,986.35 4,986.35 0.00 0.00 P-371 61.00 1 18.0 1 Steel 1100.01 false 1 0.00 1 Open 1 44.911 4,986.351 4,986.351 0.001 0.01 • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.00] 12/29/05 04:16:06 F*Mentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 7 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Pump Report • Label Elevation Control Intake Discharge Discharge Pump Calculated (ft) Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Water Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (ft) (Hp) PMP-14,715.00 On 1,715.00 4,986.71 157.21 271.71 10.78 • • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0[07.00.049.001 12/29/05 04:16:18 FWBentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 i � • • • � • Scenario: Peak Hour • Steady State Analysis Reservoir Report • Label Elevation Zone Inflow Calculated (ft) (gpm)I iydraulic Grad (ft) R-1 5,016.00 Zone-1 0.00 5,016.00 R-2 4,715.00 Zone- •157.21 4,715.00 • • Title: Project Engineer: n:\3959\005\acad\civil\modeling\watermodel.wcd WaterCAD v7.0(07.00.049.001 12/29/05 04:16:29 FOA3entley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown,CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • .............. ............ qR ...... .... ........ ............. ........................................ ............ ..... .............. \, 1... ........................... .,5 .......... it 1 ................... 77...... ... .......... .................. ........... ................ .................... .............. .......... .............. ....... ... o ................. ttt .......................... ........... ...................... ................... . ............................. ....................... ... ................................................................ .......... ............ ............................................................... ......................... ........ J ............. .. . ........ ........................... ................................. ...................--....... ....... ................. ......... .... .......... • ............................................................... ................... ........ /ri ............... ........ ........ .......................... .................................. Z�. ........ .. .......... ............................................... ................. LjLJLj ......................................... .................................................... IN .............. ........................................ .......... ............... ..................................................................................... I all .... . ....... .......... Cl) ----- ................................................................... ................ . ............................. .................................. ... kk ......... .. ................ N........... ............ ................................ ....... ...... ....... ................................. ................ ...............................................------- ............................ V ZY . ........................... ............................ .................................... ... ......... ....... ............ ...... ................... ............ ............ ..............................................................- .......... . ..................................... ................. --—----------- .................. fir -vi .. . ....... ................................................................................................. ............ ............................. ........................ ........... ....................- o ..........I.............................. ................................... ............... ................. ................................................................................ .................. C, T .......................................... ............................... ............... ......... ........................ ................. ........ ............ .......................... .......... .......... ..................................................... ........... ............... ................. ....................................................................... . ................ ........ .............................. ................. . .......... . ........ ....... .............. ............................................... ...... .............. ................................... ........ ...........................................— N m ................... ........ ......... .............................................. .................. ......... ....... .......................................................... ....... .......................................................................... ... 7......... ............... ......................................................................................................... ...... .......... ........ ....... ........ .......................................................... :1 /.yil ...... ......................... ....... ..................... ........ ......... ......... ................................... ........................... il- AM ........ ......... .... .......... ......... ........ ............................ 0 ........ ....................... m ............... ....... ......... ............... ........ ......... .....> ..................... ........ ..................... ................................. .... ................... ........ ......... ......... ........ ................................. C13 X ......... ........ .................. .................................. -i 0. ................... ........ ................ ----------- m ................. cn .. .............. ....... C) ........ .................. .... ..................................................... .... ................... ............ ........... ............. ........ ............................ ........... ................. .......... .............. .......................... ................ ......................... .. ............................ .......... �: `� .......... ............................ ............................................. ............................. .............. ........ ............11.............. ................ ........I......................... ................................. ......................... ............ ........................... ................... .....I.. ......... . ......... .................. ......... �A .......................... ................ ..................................... ................................................................ ................ ................................................ ................. ..................................I.................................. ........ .................. .......................... ..................... ............. _Z4 .............. ........ .......................... .................. ........ ................. ur > ....................... .1--..........I.-.................................. ........z .......... ................. ....... .......... .............................................. ....... Ig I --- Tj ..... ........ ................. . ..... .... ........ ... ........ ...... ........ ......... ......... ....... ...... .. ....... . ......... ... ...... ....... ........ ....... ...... ......... ...... aot rn 7 ........... ——--------------------- .......... • • • SEWER DESIGN REPORT FOR THE LEGENDS @ BRIDGER CREEK II BOZEMAN, MONTANA January 6, 2006 • Prepared By: Land West Consulting, LLC 2135 Charlotte St. Suite 1 B Bozeman, Montana 59718 • Engineer: Matt Ekstrom, P.E. • • • INTRODUCTION The Legends at Bridger Creek Subdivision II contains 57.29 acres. The proposed subdivision will have 126, R-1 lots. The purpose of this report is to provide the basis for the design of the water, sewer, and storm water improvements. WASTEWATER DISPOSAL Sewage shall be collected in a central collection system installed by the applicant. The proposed system will connect to the 10" sewer main installed with the Legends at Bridger Creek I project. This 10" main extends westward into the Bridger Creek Subdivision where it connects to a 12" sewer main. From this connection the 12"main extends westward to the western edge of the Bridger Creek Subdivision and connection to a 15" outfall main. The 15" outfall main extends westward crossing under Bridger Creek to a connection with the City's 30"main that extends along Highway 10. The 30"main extends along Highway 10 to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant located by Moss Bridge and Springhill Roads, where it will be treated. A design report, done as part of the Bridger Creek Golf Course Development, shows a 10" main in the future extension of Boylan Road. This 10"main was extended as part of the Legends I project. Calculations will show that an 8" main will serve the remainder of • the service area upstream of the Legends I project. A proposed 8"main will extend eastward along the proposed alignment of Boylan Road to the Creekwood Subdivision on the east property boundary. Other 8"mains will collect wastewater from the lots within the subdivision. Predicted Wastewater Flows The following wastewater flow calculations are based on the City of Bozeman's Design Standards and Specification Policy, March 2004: Predicted Population Table V-1 —R-1 zoning—3.81 (people/acre) 72 gpd/person 150 gpd/acre infiltration Legends at Bridger Creek II— 57.29 acres Creekwood Subdivision— 37.66 acres Mt Baldy Subdivision— 16.054 acres Ed Vogel Subdivision— 9.21 acres Total acre - 120 acres • Total Population= (120 acres)(3.81 people/acre) =457 people 0 0 • Total Average Day Demand= (457 people)(72 gpd/person) =32,904 gpd Total Infiltration Flow= (150 gpd/acre)(120 acres) = 18,000 gpd A Peaking Factor is calculated as follows: Qm�/Q = 18 +Pv2/4 +pv2 = 3.99 Where: Qm�=Max flow predicted Q =Average daily flow P =Population in thousands Qm.= 32,904 gpd x 3.99= 131,287 gpd Qmax+ Infiltration= 131,287 gpd+ 18,000 gpd= 149,287 gpd = 104 gpm The capacity of an 8" diameter sewer pipe installed at a minimum slope of 0.4% is 314 gpm. At maximum flow the four subdivisions included above will use 33% of the available capacity in the 8" main. This will leave the remaining 67%for any further capacity needed in the area. C:\Documents and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-,Iat\PUD\SEWAGE DISPOSAL.doc • • • • . K • Grading and Drainage Plan • PRELIMINARY PLAT STORM WATER PLAN for The Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision February 2006 • Prepared by: 0 MORRISON ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS PLANERS MAIERLE,INC. SINCE N945 An Employee—Ow+ted Company cwy^sm im P.O.Box 1113 901 Technology Blvd.Bozeman,MT 59772 Phone:(406)587.0721 fax(406)587.1176 • N:\3959\005\Storm\STORMWATER MASTER PLAN.doc Table of Contents I. An Introduction to the Existing Drainage System A. Existing Historical Flow Paths B. Bridger Creek 100-yr Floodplain II. The Proposed Drainage System A. Major Drainage System B. Minor Drainage System III. Recommendations and Additional Thoughts • IV. Storm Water Maintenance Plan Appendix A. Photos B. Hydrological Calculations C. Hydraulic Calculations Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 2 of 16 I. An Introduction to the Existing Drainage System • The proposed Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is located in the south half of Section 32, Township 1 South, Range 6 East. More specifically, it is located east of Story Mill Road and the Legends at Bridger Creek I, along Boylan Road extended. The development includes 127 single family lots on total area of approximately 57.3 acres. The project also has approximately 23.7 acres of open space with the Bridger Creek running through the north end of the property. The neighboring subdivision to the east does not convey runoff into the subject property. However, recent modeling and historical photographs suggest that spring runoff down the Bridger Creek Drainage can make its way through the subject property. Since the neighboring Bridger Creek is a natural, meandering stream perched on alluvial gravels, it is not uncommon to have areas adjacent to the stream that are actually at or below the elevation of the active stream bed itself. This phenomenon can be seen just west of the subject property in the Vicinity Map below. And of course the site itself generates runoff as well. All of the abovementioned sources and potential hazards are further explored within the pages of this report and are considered to be major components of the existing drainage system within subject property. A-,, Tlet� �endsat B 'idgerCr�eek'�fl�a 1 171 i' . \ \ + •�' ;`—sue�J/ ) � > i--_-fey T .,/�C L�� L��: I '• J>' ,,) i r, 1 CT vF� � �• � .:Lam`_....�_- �-�`�--•���_--tX X7-1 �r�-/ /,t•�., C40 36 l •�. =�— - I ji - Subject Property r 117 - —T• � c—-,q� 4 r y y�..� r l ����''% i%�� \' lo`.—. ice:.... .. (ail ?Lgend el .'l (Historical 1 Flow,;Path Current 1FIow Path • Vicinity Map Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 3 of 16 0 • Existing Drainage Basin The subject property has historically drained to the west, paralleling Bridger Creek as depicted with the cyan colored drainage arrows in Figure 1. This figure illustrates how the creek is perched when compared to land adjacent to it. The existing contours show an undulating surface comprised of farming modifications mixed with ancient channel meander scars. If water is spilled from the existing left or south bank of the creek, it will flow away from the creek and proceed in a westerly fashion towards Story Mill Road. The cyan arrows along the west boundary of the subject property indicate locations where drainage will likely leave the property. /..H 10, r . p Figure 1 — Onsite historical flow paths. The historical flow paths offsite are represented with dark blue drainage arrows as seen in Figure 2 on the next page. Field surveys and observations in and around the low point of Story Mill Road were unable to locate an existing roadway culvert. It appears that the lands east of Story Mill Road provide an area for natural ponding of excessive runoff from Bridger Creek with no flow through a culvert under the road at this location. Story Mill Road acts as a barrier creating this historical depressional storage behind it. The limit of this storage volume is controlled by the overtopping elevation necessary for the conveyance of runoff over Story Mill Road. Our calculations estimate this overtopping water surface elevation to be in the 4712.5 to 4713.5 range (City of Bozeman Datum). • This historical backwater effect created by Story Mill road will obviously have an impact on lands immediately adjacent and east of the road. However, it will have no effect on the subject property. Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bddger Creek 11 Page 4 of 16 `i r Ilk 0.0 �'"; �,srrT i a •G� 4 � s,_` a .JI ate'" ,��' :_� 1, 1 a J R ti • ,_ C"'�'` y`,�:• _ _- Via. - Ill {� /J /� .Jt �� y � •• IC ��. Figure 2 — Offsite historical flow paths. After the excessive runoff overtops Story Mill Road, it then proceeds across a parking area just north of the NRCS building where it encounters an old railroad bed. The bed has a hole cut through it allowing flow to cross to the west side of the bed. This rail road bed shows up on the FEMA Flood Plain Map as well as the USGS Quadrangle Map. The barrow areas along the side of the existing railroad bed are considerably lower than native ground and act as channels routing flood flows to the northwest and ultimately back to Bridger Creek. The subject property and proposed subdivision will not change this existing drainage pattern but rather use it as it historically has. The proposed subdivision will detain or retain its own storm water onsite as required by the City of Bozeman Storm Water Regulations. It is noted that during large runoff events, the proposed subdivision will convey runoff in the same fashion that has historically been conveyed. Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 5 of 16 • 0 The Bridger Creek 100-yr Flood Plain The current regulatory floodplain designation for the subject property is published in the 1988 FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS). According to the study and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels, the subject property is designated as Zone AE along the primary floodway with shaded Zone X on the fringe and un-shaded Zone X towards Bridger Drive to the South. The floodway is defined as the stream channel plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free from encroachment so that 100 year flood can be conveyed with less than a 0.5 foot surcharge to the 100 year base flood elevation (BFE). The floodway fringe is the remainder floodplain area(s) between the designated floodway boundary and the ground-truth floodplain boundary. The floodway fringe is the portion of the floodplain that can be completely obstructed without increasing the 100 year BFE by more than 0.5 foot. Essentially Zone AE is a special flood hazard area and indicates that the BFE has been established along Bridger Creek using hydraulic modeling techniques, while shaded Zone X designates either areas of 500 year flood or areas of 100 year flood with average depths less than 1 foot. A significant portion of the property is designated as un-shaded Zone X, indicating land outside of the 500 year floodplain but still within the scope of the FIS. Please see Figure 3 containing the FEMA FIRM map 300028-0008C. - This area intentionally left blank - • Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 6 of 16 • i • 6 C M J LEGM +�.- , �r• - The Legends at-Bridger Creek 11 --=- FIRM 300028-0008C " - raa+ is ` gt�x 8ri l,9roil+ rokl�z told rowx� er ..�. reek 3 AEI MR 4 v fD 'IJEr CD •in 100. •i Y f 'iokfM .�� r....r. 0 +Y Row. 10Wx Subject Prope CL tdkl. Zone X Row mitex a ---j _ . _ e rawl.a rokl�j �.__ Legend �� HistoricalMR x • ` zoKf Flow Path �\ rdrf;•� 1 �- •� -�``\ Current 204f+ �' Flow Path ,r OTIIfRfLOODAREAS °'� 4` \\ , m rokf x ZONE X Areas of SOO-Iear flood: areas of \ rovlx ", r1 "!i to -Vear flood with aserav dcpttn tow of less than I foot or with drainage r0 ` . areas less than I souant Omit: and CD r was Ifto'ecte l Oy kvm from 100• _ -4 \ Who 7 k. yeas flood. ......�.-..,.—. O ` / u! OTNfRAREAS ZONE X Areas Ceutmirxd to be outsbe 500- year flood pwn. - "r .! r; rove+ / mvex\ t ZONE AE Base flood elevacionsdetermined. •-• 0 • While approximate boundaries are published on the FIRM panels based on coarse survey data, FEMA methodology requires that the actual boundary for the edge of the AE zone be determined based on the intersection of the natural ground with the published BFE. A summary of this delineation and regulatory BFEs are shown in Figure 4. Fzi Ike CD CD ♦J C � W 4) ACC� `` R 1r rr i 11 1. - <� CO01 Q Jor LL 0. Aj W r / ;N� iwr Figure 4— Ground Truthed BFE Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 8 of 16 • It should be noted that two gaps exist along the south floodplain boundary indicating • areas where flows may spill out of the creek bank. These areas are denoted with red arrows on Figure 4. These areas do exhibit signs of previous inundation which has also been alleged in verbal historical accounts by property owners. Because Bridger Creek is a perched alluvial stream, a significant portion of the land to the south has natural ground elevations that are lower than the regulatory BFE. Any water that overtops the banks on the south side of Bridger Creek is expected to flow initially south and then west towards the property line as shown in previous figures. Since the FIS was published in 1988, planform and grade changes within the stream reach have changed the hydraulic function of Bridger Creek. In order to verify the FIS boundary with more recent floodplain data along this particular reach of Bridger Creek, MMI constructed an updated hydraulic model based on current geometric data. This model used a 100-Yr event flow of 1150 cfs and was calibrated using rating curves interpolated from the FEMA FIS and a recent Montana Department of Transportation study related to the Highway 86 Bridge replacement. The model results indicated a smaller floodplain boundary with narrower regions of potential spillage along the South side of Bridger Creek than the original FIS model. Another notable difference between the regulatory FIS and the MMI model is in the area immediately upstream of the east property boundary where MMI model elevations were approximately 2 feet lower than those published in the FIS. This difference is significant in that the model predicts water will not spill out of the south side of Bridger Creek on the adjacent land just upstream of the subject property. • Summary of the Existing Drainage System Based on the Current FEMA study and the MMI modeling results, it is possible that some water will overtop isolated portions of the creek bank along the south side of Bridger Creek and flow through the proposed development during significant events such as the 100-yr event. This potential spillage will most likely be low velocity water with depths less than one foot. This description sounds more like a shaded Zone X rather than an unshaded Zone X. Based on site visits, topographic and airphoto analysis, it does appear that two primary preferential flow paths do exist on the subject property. The subdivision will take these paths into consideration and incorporate them into the proposed layout. During large runoff events, spillage from the Bridger Creek will likely use these primary flow paths and proceed off-site through other historical flow paths resulting in the overtopping of Story Mill Road as mentioned earlier in this report. The source and timing of these large rapid snowmelt events is obviously not produced on or modified by the subject property and historical outfalls will continue to be utilized by the subject property. Therefore, the development of the subject property will have no measurable effect on the historical magnitude or route of the 100-yr food events in this area. • Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Le-gends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 9 of 16 • • II. Proposed Drainage Plan The Legends at Bridger Creek II Storm Water Plan consists of two drainage systems- a Minor and Major System. The Minor Drainage System is designed to provide public convenience and to accommodate moderate, relatively frequent runoff events. The Major Drainage System has the task of conveying significantly more water while protecting structures from inundation. The Major Drainage System begins operating when the rate or volume of runoff exceeds the capacity of the Minor Drainage System. The storm return period for the Minor Drainage System for this project shall be 25-years for conveyance structures and 10-years for ponds. The Major Drainage System shall convey the 100- year event without inundating building structures. Generally speaking, development tends to increase downstream peak flows by increasing runoff volumes and by decreasing the time it takes the runoff to travel downstream. As part of the minor drainage system, retention and detention pond areas designed for the 10-year return period shall be implemented to reduce the downstream peak runoff to levels that existed before the subdivision was constructed. The pond areas will also provide settlement time for sediment and other storm water pollutant loads to drop out. Design of the Drainage Plan was based on survey data collected across the subdivision site using sub-centimeter GPS equipment. The data was used to produce a 1, contour map of the existing ground. The proposed plan builds off of the existing topography and takes advantage of the many natural features that contribute to the management of storm water. Significant lot grading and first floor elevations are proposed as part of the Stormwater Plan to facilitate proper drainage and manage the risk of potential flooding as the result of historical rapid snow melt runoff events in this area and the proximity of the proposed subdivision to Bridger Creek. For the purposes of this study, the modified rational method was implemented to estimate peak runoff rates from the 10, 25, and 100- yr storm events. The hydrological calculations can be found in the appendix. • Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bddger Creek 11 Page 10 of 16 i • The Maior Drainage System • The backbone of the major drainage system throughout the proposed Subdivision is the Legends Greenway Corridor. This greenway corridor has the capacity to attenuate and convey the runoff generated by the 100-year event without inundating any building structures within the subdivision. All road culverts placed within the corridor shall be designed to convey runoff from the 25-year event without overtopping the roadway. Site grading shall be completed so that storm events greater than 100-year event will pass over roadways or through emergency overflow areas without causing significant erosion. The street sections in front of the proposed homes are designed to provide additional runoff conveyance away from the homes, down to the streets and eventually into the Legend's Greenway Corridor. The Grading and Drainage Plan shows the necessary finished surface grading for each lot. It is noted that at a minimum, first floor elevations are approximately 0.75 foot about the finished grade contours as shown on the Grading and Drainage Plan. Finished ground and first floor elevations shall also be located on the final plat and in the subdivision covenants. Particular conveyance sections were modeled using Hec-Ras and FlowMaster design software. As the runoff encounters known obstacles like roadways, back-water conditions were created. The finished ground and first floor elevations have been adjusted accordingly with backwater effect in mind. Please see Figure 5 for the location of a few modeled street and swale sections. A summary of the results can be found in Table 1. Table 1. Est. Max' Est. Post Conveys ID Street & Swales Capacity(cfs) Q100(cfs) 100-Yr Event 1 Boylan Road @ 1% 95 10 Yes 2 North View Road @ 0.6% 50 5 Yes 3 Typical 30' Alley @1.4% 30 3 Yes 4 Legend's Greenway Corridor 300 - Yes 1 Max Capacity for street sections is measure from back of sidewalk to back of sidewalk. Alleys are measured edged of pavement to edge of pavement. As with any development, the possibility of experiencing a 500-Yr flood event or the failure of a stream bank can exist. The probability of it occurring in any given year is slim, somewhere on the order of a 0.20 to 0.99 percent chance. Despite the improbability, Morrison-Maierle has looked at the ability of this subdivision to convey significantly large flood flows. For example, the Legend's Greenway Corridor can convey upwards of 300 cfs if necessary, without inundating building structures. These types of measures should help manage the risk associated with Bridger Creek. Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 11 of 16 a 16 5 MITT" „ .. . 11w i + At Me • r r M, ► ' � r — A o, L > ti + + . rt Q + + t LL- + • fir. N �, - ._-- 4` 1• N' Figure 5 —Typical Conveyance Sections Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 12 of 16 The Minor Drainage System • The minor drainage system is comprised of roads, culverts, swales, and retention/detention ponds. The ponds shall be designed to detain the 10-year post- development runoff volume while releasing flow at a rate not exceeding the 10-year pre- development rate. If larger storm events are encountered, site grading and the emergency pond overflow structures will provide a designated path for the overflow to pass into the creek corridor or natural drainage path without causing significant erosion to the pond. The modified rational method was used to size all retention/detention ponds. Please see Figure 6 for the noted detention/retention areas. The 10-Yr storm event shall be routed into each pond and through the outlet structure using a "delta time step & mass balance" method. All outlet structures are modeled to operate in the inlet control condition with the weir and orifice equations used to model the release rate with respect to pond depth. The design of the pond outlet structure shall be simple, visually unobtrusive, and cost effective. It is proposed that small diameter high density polyethylene (HDPE) culvert pipe will accomplish these two tasks at once. HDPE pipe shall be the pond's release culvert and at the same time, provide control of the release rate. Ponds Three ponds are proposed to retain or detain storm water runoff from the site and can be • seen in Figure 6. Pond A is located in the southwest corner of the property and is a detention pond with approximately 13,800 cubic feet (cft) of storage. The contributing area to this pond is approximately 29 acres and is shaded orange in Figure 6. The pond releases at the 10-yr post-development rate of no more than 4.6 cfs. This is accomplished through an outlet structure comprised of three — 10 inch pipes laid at a slope of 0.4%. The outfall of the pond is to lands west of the subject property in an existing drainage swale. For storm events that are greater than the 10-yr return period, the runoff proceeds over the outlet structure emergency overflow without inundating any buildings in the proposed subdivision. Pond B is located in the northwest corner of the property and is a retention pond with approximately 9,000 cft of storage. The pond has enough capacity to completely contain the runoff from a 10-yr, 2hr storm event. The contributing area to this pond is approximately 6.8 acres and is shaded pink in Figure 6. If a larger storm event is encountered, then runoff spills back into Boylan Road and proceeds west through Legends I Subdivision. Pond C is pond located in the northwest corner of the property and is a retention pond with approximately 1,700 cft of storage. The pond has enough capacity to completely contain the runoff from a 10-yr, 2hr storm event. The contributing area to this pond is approximately 1.3 acres and is shaded yellow in Figure 6. If a larger storm event is encountered, then runoff spills back into Boylan Road and proceeds west through . Legends I Subdivision. Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 13 of 16 t 7 •ter r- • F 'R r + • ;,fir t• rT FFI-M • > ae Figure 6— Pond & culvert locations Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Le-gends at Bhdaer Creek 11 Page 14 of 16 • • Inlets, Culverts and Street Flow Inlets will be needed at low points and where street conveyance capacities are exceeded. This.project has inlets in both sump and on grade conditions. Culverts are also proposed where the Legend's Greenway Corridor intersects with subdivision roads. Culvert and inlet locations can be seen in Figure 6 and are denoted as items I through 6. The proposed sizes, estimate of capacities and number of inlets can be found in Table 2 below. For this particular site, street conveyance capacities using a 9.5 foot spread from the face of curb were adequate and it appears no additional storm water main runs or piping will be necessary. If street intersections produce a low point or sump condition in the curb return, then flow-through concrete valley gutters are proposed and can be seen on the Grading and Drainage Plan. Table 2. Est. Post Description Slope Head Act. Cap. #Inlets ID Culverts Q25(cfs) (ft/ft) (ft) (cfs) 1 Boylan Road Greenway Xing' 9 1-27"X 44" 0.009 3 24 2"HH"in Sump 2 North View Greenway Xing' 10 2-22"X 36" 0.004 4 70 NA 3 Int. North View&Maiden Rock 6 1- 181, 0.01 2.5 10 3"H"in Sump 4 North View Low point 2 1- 12" 0.01 2.5 4 2"H"in Sump 5 North View Existing Drainage Xing 3 1- 12" 0.005 2 3 NA 6 West Boundary 5 1- 181, 0.008 2.5 9 6"H"on Grade 7 Pond C inlets 2 1- 12" 0.005 2.5 3 2"H"on Grade 1 Flows greater than the 25-yr event are designed to overtop roads and proceed down the Greenway Swale. Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 15 of 16 i • III. Recommendations and Additional Thoughts • There are always inherent risks when developing land next to streams. The benefits can outweigh the risks if the risks are managed properly. It is recommended that the Grading and Drainage Plan be adhered to and that minimum first floor elevations be enforced. All lots that are immediately adjacent to Bridger Creek shall have a first floor elevation that is at least 2 feet above the Base Flood Elevation or 100-yr event water surface elevation. Further refinement of the Grading and Drainage Plan may be necessary as this project progresses and final design begins. It should be disclosed to prospective buyers that this area is next to a stream and that lands in this area may become inundated during large events. Although no subdivisions lots are in the 100- year floodplain as published by FEMA, it is recommended that prospective lot buyers consider obtaining flood insurance due to proximity. As the result of short lot setbacks and the proposed lot grading, driveways may tend to be steeper than usual if a step between the first floor of the residence and the level of the garage floor is not implemented. Not all lots will need this proposed step. However some lots that may benefit from such a step are 20, 21, 22, 26, 40, 121, & 100. This is not a complete list and it may not be clear if a particular lot needs a step until the some of the building details (such as driveway location) are established. Due to the acute angle formed between North View Road and the Legend's Greenway Corridor, it is possible that a small landscape retaining wall for the south west corner of lot 100 may be needed. Creative landscaping may also accomplish the task of blending the 4 foot difference in elevation. Again it is imperative that the lot finished grade and finished floor elevations be adhered to. • There are areas along the south side of Bridger Creek that possess over-steepened banks, with relative high rates of erosion. These areas are for the most part hundreds of feet away from residential lots. However, it may be prudent to complete a bank stabilization assessment and provide any necessary natural or soft bank stabilization efforts such as plantings now or in the near future. IV. The Storm Water Maintenance Plan The maintenance of the onsite storm water collection, detention and discharge release appurtenances shall be integrated as part of the duties of maintenance personnel responsible for normal grounds keeping. Duties shall include routine inspections to ensure that debris, yard waste, and seasonal ice does not impede operation of the detention ponds and discharge structures. These inspections shall occur after each major runoff event and on a continued monthly basis throughout the year. All results shall be recorded and kept on file for future verification by regulation agencies. In addition to the routine inspections, annual inspections of appurtenances shall assess and mitigate, if necessary, performance of the detention ponds, and release structures. These inspections shall address accumulation of sediment and debris in the detention ponds and release structures as well as any weather or vandalism-related damage. Detention areas and swales shall be mowed on a regular basis during the growing season so as to remain free of vegetation that might impede their conveyance capacity or ability to function. Preliminary Plat Storm Water Plan for The Legends at Bridger Creek 11 Page 16 of 16 i TIDE L GENDS AT BRIDGER CREEK II SUBDIV SION =_ �WWo - k � CO 1 `"\' GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN =o S r �v /rj / N� jAj �� �� �^ A� 0) is nd OPEN } i (• CF Co L LC) %ti e nti o �i � Env. g IT 00 cft Ln d k, RNA e non J. a 0 o' O L O/ fi •ue^ / ' f . . i 1 r F�-,+y & INS .�° � > ,sue s~���y, >Y .n' vO `� ',,,n• / � .>,.° �:_" N N N N N -; ♦, � r� � � '�. T O LS .. � � � d k. o .. F- F- F- �-, o .. � a o•, Pond A 0 0 0 0i2c., N N °^ '• L T 34 F o F- F T 33 0 7 a Detentio o �- SP ;$�0 c , . , OT 5 L T 9 0 13 •' . ~ r' -'>u v �, . � Fo o �. � � - �• ' ,.• p 8 L 69 OT LD >, "�. �;;, > 0 4 EN SPACE 9 .,» °` , T 49 � •-'° E 'N T 76 71 r` 0 66 v' L 6 1 T'S 51• L_ 4 ` ° y a o. o rn rn rn 040 co ' m L 55 a. LOT {� LO 47• ` ✓> i `' ,, a �, LO 83 0 LO 4 OT 63 LO 54 o OT 53 OT �` o : . oF 7 - �°� ..>,r ,� %° is > �'`. '��..... �> : %+� , ^,..^.. �" '`� '•� ...t1 m 0 C 0 c Legend Ponds H drolo 3 J O O gy m L a o Concrete Valley Gutter Pond Type Volume Outlet Structure Depth Release Rate Subarea Size Q10post Q25post Q100post ,DO ° 50 ,� r (cft) (ft) (cfs) (acres) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) ® nM7 �. Inlets&Storm Pipe A DET 13,800 3-10"HDPE 1.5 4.6 A 29 12 15 20 °CONTO,R,,;,�,,;,,�-°,'°°` / B RET 9,000 NA 1.0 NA B 17 4 5 7 Z Finished Contours C RET 1,700 NA 1.0 NA C 9 2 3 3 W • o t'e.. Existing Contours VERTICAL DATUM = COB. «- Flow Direction FINISHED CONTOURS ARE FINISHED GRADE. 5""`"°NaE„ O _ Retaining Walls FINISHED FLOOR = FINISHED GRADE + 0.75 FEET. z ST-1 i R v ` iI Facing north along east side of Story Mill Road—Natural depression area. r. 'i .A. t � C Facing west looking down flow path across NRCS lot to hole in RR bed. • i� i �r AW y„ Looking north • ' • bed. 4 Looking • down west side of ' • bed • • BridgerCreekGolf Course MMI#:;3959.005 • DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER:;Chris Wasia DESCRPTION:!Total Subarea 10-yr Peak Flow MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A*(Tc/60)_B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION= 1) BASIN AREA PRE= 43.30 'AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY �__ ___ (YR) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc=L 43.0 !MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.44 _ 5 0.52 0.64 0.64 PRE-DEV C= 0.20 J 10 0.64 0.65 0.79 25 0.78 0.64 0.97 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 1.15 B= 0.65 100 1.01 0.67 1.26 STORM INTENSITY= 0.79 IN/HR • PRE-DEV Qp= 6.88 CFS • 0 0 • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Total Subarea 10-yr Peak Flow Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 43.30 AC POST-DEV Tc= 32.0 MIN POST-DEV C= 0.45 STORM INTENSITY= 0.96 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 18.76 CFS DURATIO: • • MMI#: 3959.005 DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER: Chris Wasia DESCRPTION: Total Subarea 25-yr Peak Flow MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A*(Tc/60)_B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ= 25 YR(DURATION= 1) BASINAREAPRE=j 43.30 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY (YR.) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc=L 43.0 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.44 5 0.52 0.64 0.64 PRE-DEV C=F 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 0.79 25 0.78 0.64 0.97 STORM A= 0.78 50 0.92 0.66 1.15 B= 0.64 100 1.01 0.67 1.26 STORM INTENSITY= 0.97 IN/HR • PRE-DEV Qp= 8.36 CFS • 0 r • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Total Subarea 25-yr Peak Flow Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 43.30 AC POST-DEV Tc= 32 MIN POST-DEV C STORM INTENSITY= 1.17 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 22.73 CFS DURATIO: • MMI#:3959.005 • DATE: 1/25/2006 -- --- - - -- ENGINEER: Chris Wasia DESCRPTION:f Total Subarea 100-yr Peak Flow MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp C i A PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A*(Tc/60)-B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ= 100:j YR(DURATION= 1) BASIN AREA PRE= 43.30 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY (YR) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc=r__43.0-]MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.44 5 0.52 0.64 0.64 PRE-DEV C= 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 0.79 25 0.78 0.64 0.97 STORM A= 1.01 50 0.92 0.66 1.15 B = 0.67 100 1.01 0.67 1.26 STORM INTENSITY= 1.26 IN/HR • PRE-DEV Qp= 10.93 CFS • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Total Subarea 100-yr Peak Flow Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 43.30 AC POST-DEV Tc= 32.0 MIN POST-DEV C= 0.45 STORM INTENSITY= 1.54 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 29.99 CFS DURATIO: • • MMI#: 3959.005 DATE: 1/25/2006- ENGINEER:,-Chris Wasia DESCRPTION:'North View&Maiden Rock MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A*(Tc/60)P (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ=�_ 25^ ,YR(DURATION= 1) BASIN AREA PRE=l 7.00 I AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY (YR) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc 15.0_ MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.83 5 0.52 0.64 1.26 PRE-DEV C=F--0.20 ! 10 0.64 0.65 1.58 25 0.78 0.64 1.89 STORM A= 0.78 50 0.92 0.66 2.30 B= 0.64 100 1.01 0.67 2.56 STORM INTENSITY= 1.89 IN/HR • PRE-DEV Qp= 2.65 CFS • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD North View & Maiden Rock Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 7.00 AC POST-DEV Tc=�15.0 MIN POST-DEV C STORM INTENSITY= 1.89 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 5.97 CFS DURATION= • MMI#:13959.005 DATE:;'1/ 55/2006 ENGINEER:j Chris Wasia DESCRPTION:INorth View&Swale Xing MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A*(Tc/60)_B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ=i 25 I YR(DURATION= 1) BASIN AREA PRE= 19.20 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY (YR) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc=i 43.0 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.44 5 0.52 0.64 0.64 PRE-DEV C=;__0.20 10 0.64 0.65 0.79 25 0.78 0.64 0.97 STORM A= 0.78 50 0.92 0.66 1.15 B= 0.64 100 1.01 0.67 1.26 STORM INTENSITY= 0.97 IN/HR • PRE-DEV Qp= 3.71 CFS MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD North View & Swale Xing Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 19.20 AC POST-DEV Tc= 32.0 MIN POST-DEV C= 0.45 STORM INTENSITY= 1.17 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 10.08 CFS DURATIO: MMI#:13959.005 DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER:I Chris Wasia i 1 DESCRPTION:`North View Existing Drainage Xing MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A * (Tc/60)_B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ YR(DURATION= 1) BASIN AREA PRE 14.00 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY (YR) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc 36.0 2 0.36 0.6 0.55 5 0.52 0.64 0.81 PRE-DEV C 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 1.00 25 0.78 0.64 1.22 STORM A= 0.78 50 0.92 0.66 1.45 B= 0.64 100 1.01 0.67 1.61 STORM INTENSITY= 1.22 1N/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 3.40 CFS • 0 • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD North View Existing Drainage Xing Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 14.00 AC POST-DEV TC= 12.0 MIN POST-DEV C 0.45 I STORM INTENSITY= 2.18 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 13.76 CFS DURATIO: • • MMI#: 3959.005 • DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER: Chris Wasia Pond A - Detention MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION=1) i=A-(Tc/60)'B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) BASIN AREA PRE= 28.9 AC STORM EVENT I STORM i COEFF I INTENSITY YR A B IN/HR PRE-DEV Tc= 43.0 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.13 5 0.52 0.64 0.18 PRE-DEV C= 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 0.22 25 0.78 0.64 0.27 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 0.31 B= 0.65 100 1.01 0.67 0.34 STORM INTENSITY= 0.79 IN/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 4.59 CFS POST-DEVELOPMENT POND VOLUME: CONST.RELEASE (CF) BASIN AREA PRE= 28.9 AC 9914.46 . POST-DEV Tc= 32.0 MIN TRIANGLE RELEASE DETENTION (CF) POST-DEV C= 0.45 17725.95 STORM INTENSITY= 0.96 IN/HR AVERAGE VOLUME (CF) POST-DEV Qp= 12.52 CFS 13820.21 OUTLET STRUCTURE DESIGN RETENTION (CF) POND: Pond A-Detention 38390.76 REQUIRED VOL= 13820.21 CF (AVG.B/W CONST.&TRIANGLE RELEASE) DIAMETER= 10.00 IN LENGTH OF PIPE= 70.00 FT QPRE= 4.59 CFS HEAD WATER= 1.00 FT AREA= N/A SF N= 0.012 ORIFICE= N/A IN Ke= 0.50 ORIFICE FLOW= N/A CFS SLOPE OF PIPE= 0.004 FT/FT FLOW OUT= 1.49 CFS "FLOW GOOD AVE SURF AREA= 9914.46 SF • N:\3959\005\Storm\Pond A.xls 1 OF 2 PRINTED: 2/6/2006 Pond A - Detention POND VOLUME CALC'S OUTLET STRUCUTRE CALC'S Triangle Release Constant Release SLOPE OF ENERGY ORIFICE DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME PIPE FLOW OUT (MIN) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (FT/FT) (CFS) (CFS) 30.40 1.00 12.95 15018.95 9548.60 0.000 0.909 1.428 31.40 0.97 12.68 15150.21 9608.57 0.001 1.083 32.40 0.96 12.42 15275.95 9662.29 0.002 1.232 33.40 0.94 12.18 15396.45 9710.06 0.003 1.366 34.40 0.92 11.95 15511.98 9752.18 0.004 1.487 35.40 0.90 1 L73 15622.77 9788.90 0.005 1.600 36.40 0.89 11.52 15729.03 9820.47 0.006 1.705 37.40 0.87 11.32 15830.97 9847.12 0.007 1.804 38.40 0.86 11.12 15928.78 9869.05 0.008 1.897 39.40 0.84 10.94 16022.63 9886.47 0.009 1.986 40.40 0.83 10.76 16112.69 9899.55 0.010 2.072 41.40 0.81 10.59 16199.12 9908.47 0.011 2.154 42.40 0.80 10.43 16282.05 9913.39 0.012 2.233 43.40 0.79 10.27 16361.62 9914.46 0.013 2.309 44.40 0.78 10.12 16437.97 9911.82 0.014 2.383 45.40 0.77 9.98 16511.19 9905.61 0.015 2.455 46.40 0.76 9.84 16581.42 9895.94 0.016 2.525 47.40 0.75 9.70 16648.76 9882.95 0.017 2.592 48.40 0.74 9.57 16713.30 9866.74 0.018 2.658 49.40 0.73 9.44 16775.14 9847.42 0.019 2.723 50.40 0.72 9.32 16834.37 9825.09 0.020 2.786 51.40 0.71 9.20 16891.08 9799.85 0.021 2.847 52.40 0.70 9.09 16945.34 9771.78 0.022 2.908 53.40 0.69 8.98 16997.23 9740.97 0.023 2.967 54.40 0.68 8.87 17046.83 9707.51 0.024 3.024 55.40 0.67 8.77 17094.20 9671.47 0.025 3.081 56.40 0.67 8.66 17139.41 9632.93 0.026 3.137 57.40 0.66 8.57 17182.52 9591.96 0.027 3.192 58.40 0.65 8.47 17223.60 9548.62 0.028 3.246 59.40 0.64 8.38 17262.70 9502.99 0.029 3.299 60.40 0.64 8.29 17299.87 9455.12 0.030 3.351 61.40 0.63 8.20 17335.17 9405.07 0.031 3.402 62.40 0.62 8.11 17368.64 9352.89 0.032 3.453 63.40 0.62 8.03 17400.34 9298.66 0.033 3.503 64.40 0.61 7.95 17430.32 9242.40 0.034 3.552 65.40 0.61 7.87 17458.60 9184.18 0.035 3.600 66.40 0.60 7.79 17485.25 9124.05 0.036 3.648 67.40 0.59 7.72 17510.29 9062.05 0.037 3.695 68.40 0.59 7.64 17533.77 8998.21 0.038 3.742 69.40 0.58 7.57 17555.72 8932.60 0.039 3.788 70.40 0.58 7.50 17576.18 8865.24 0.040 3.833 • N:\3959\005\Storm\Pond A.xls 2 OF 2 PRINTED: 2/6/2006 MMI#: 3959.005 • DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER: Chris Wasia Pond B - Retention MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION=1) i=A-(Tc/60)"a (CITY OF BOZEMAN) BASIN AREA PRE= 6.78 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY YR A B IN/HR PRE-DEV Tc= 27.0 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.13 5 0.52 0.64 0.18 PRE-DEV C= 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 0.22 25 0.78 0.64 0.27 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 0.31 B= 0.65 1 100 1.01 0.67 0.34 STORM INTENSITY= 1.08 IN/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 1.46 CFS POST-DEVELOPMENT POND VOLUME: CONST.RELEASE (CF) BASIN AREA PRE= 6.78 AC2078.89 • POST-DEV Tc= 18.0 MIN TRIANGLE RELEASE tr DETENTION (CF) POST-DEV C= 0.45 "3625.06 STORM INTENSITY= 1.40 IN/HR AVERAGE VOLUME (CF) POST-DEV Qp= 4.27 CFS '2851.97 OUTLET STRUCTURE DESIGN RETENTION is (CF) POND: Pond B-Retention 9006.55 REQUIRED VOL= 2851.97 CF (AVG.B/W CONST.&TRIANGLE RELEASE) DIAMETER= 10.00 IN LENGTH OF PIPE= 70.00 FT QPRE= 1.46 CFS HEAD WATER= 5.00 FT AREA= 0.30 SF N= 0.012 ORIFICE= 7 3/8 IN Ke= 0.50 ORIFICE FLOW= 3.19 CFS SLOPE OF PIPE= 0.005 FT/FT FLOW OUT= 4.73 CFS "NEED ORIFICE AVE SURF AREA= 415.78 SF • N:\3959\005\Storm\Pond B.xls 1 OF 2 PRINTED: 2/6/2006 • Pond B - Retention POND VOLUME CALC'S OUTLET STRUCUTRE CALC'S Triangle Release Constant Release SLOPE OF ENERGY ORIFICE DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME PIPE FLOW OUT (MIN) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (FT/FT) (CFS) (CFS) 17.10 1.45 4.42 2994.63 1979.20 0.000 4.543 3.194 18.10 1.39 4.26 3041.89 2002.29 0.001 4.581 19.10 1.35 4.11 3085.95 2021.80 0.002 4.619 20.10 1.30 3.98 3127.06 2038.01 0.003 4.656 21.10 1.26 3.85 3165.47 2051.20 0.004 4.693 22.10 1.22 3.74 3201.39 2061.59 0.005 4.730 23.10 1.19 3.63 3235.00 2069.39 0.006 4.766 24.10 1.16 3.53 3266.46 2074.77 0.007 4.803 25.10 1.13 3.44 3295.92 2077.89 0.008 4.839 26.10 1.10 3.35 3323.51 2078.89 0.009 4.874 27.10 1.07 3.27 3349.34 2077.92 0.010 4.910 28.10 1.05 3.20 3373.52 2075.07 0.011 4.945 29.10 1.02 3.13 3396.15 2070.47 0.012 4.980 30.10 1.00 3.06 3417.32 2064.20 0.013 5.015 31.10 0.98 2.99 3437.09 2056.35 0.014 5.049 32.10 0.96 2.93 3455.55 2047.01 0.015 5.083 33.10 0.94 2.87 3472.76 2036.25 0.016 5.117 34.10 0.92 2.82 3488.79 2024.14 0.017 5.151 35.10 0.91 2.77 3503.69 2010.74 0.018 5.185 36.10 0.89 2.72 3517.51 1996.11 0.019 5.218 . 37.10 0.87 2.67 3530.31 1980.31 0.020 5.251 38.10 0.86 2.62 3542.12 1963.38 0.021 5.284 39.10 0.85 2.58 3553.00 1945.37 0.022 5.317 40.10 0.83 2.54 3562.97 1926.34 0.023 5.349 41.10 0.82 2.50 3572.08 1906.30 0.024 5.381 42.10 0.81 2.46 3580.35 1885.32 0.025 5.414 43.10 0.79 2.42 3587.84 1863.42 0.026 5.446 44.10 0.78 2.39 3594.55 1840.63 0.027 5.477 45.10 0.77 2.35 3600.53 1817.00 0.028 5.509 46.10 0.76 2.32 3605.79 1792.54 0.029 5.540 47.10 0.75 2.29 3610.37 1767.29 0.030 5.571 48.10 0.74 2.25 3614.29 1741.27 0.031 5.602 49.10 0.73 2.22 3617.56 1714.52 0.032 5.633 50.10 0.72 2.20 3620.22 1687.05 0.033 5.664 51.10 0.71 2.17 3622.28 1658.88 0.034 5.695 52.10 0.70 2.14 3623.76 1630.05 0.035 5.725 53.10 0.69 2.11 3624.68 1600.56 0.036 5.755 54.10 0.68 2.09 3625.06 1570.45 0.037 5.785 55.10 0.68 2.06 3624.90 1539.72 0.038 5.815 56.10 0.67 2.04 3624.24 1508.39 0.039 5.845 57.10 0.66 2.02 3623.08 1476.49 0.040 5.874 • N:\3959\005\Storm\Pond B.As 2 OF 2 PRINTED: 2/6/2006 MMI#: 3959.005 • DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER: Chris Wasia Pond C - Retention MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION=1) i=A*(Tc/60).B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) BASIN AREA PRE= 1.3 AC STORM EVENT I STORM i COEFF I INTENSITY YR A B IN/HR PRE-DEV Tc= 10.0 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.13 5 0.52 0.64 0.18 PRE-DEV C= 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 0.22 25 0.78 0.64 0.27 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 0.31 B= 0.65 1 100 1.01 0.67 0.34 . STORM INTENSITY= 2.05 IN/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 0.53 CFS POST-DEVELOPMENT POND VOLUME: CONST.RELEASE (CF) BASIN AREA PRE= 1.3 AC 293.59 • POST-DEVTc= 6.0 MIN TRIA (C GRELEASE DETENTION (CF) POST-DEV C= 0.45 501.59 STORM INTENSITY= 2.86 IN/HR AVERAGE VOLUME (CF) POST-DEV Qp= 1.67 CFS 397.59 OUTLET STRUCTURE DESIGN RETENTION (CF) POND: Pond C-Retention 1726.92 REQUIRED VOL= 397.59 CF (AVG.B/W CONST.&TRIANGLE RELEASE) DIAMETER= 10.00 IN LENGTH OF PIPE= 70.00 FT QPRE= 0.53 CFS HEAD WATER= 5.00 FT AREA= 0.30 SF N= 0.012 ORIFICE= 7 3/8 IN Ke= 0.50 ORIFICE FLOW= 3.19 CFS SLOPE OF PIPE= 0.005 FT/FT FLOW OUT= 4.73 CFS "NEED ORIFICE AVE SURF AREA= 58.72 SF N:\3959\005\Storm\Pond C.xls 1 OF 2 PRINTED: 2/6/2006 • Pond C - Retention POND VOLUME CALC'S OUTLET STRUCUTRE CALC'S Triangle Release Constant Release SLOPE OF ENERGY ORIFICE DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME PIPE FLOW OUT (MIN) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (FT/FT) (CFS) (CFS) 5.70 2.96 1.73 404.17 276.20 0.000 4.543 3.194 6.70 2.66 1.56 422.59 285.18 0.001 4.581 7.70 2.43 1.42 437.81 290.63 0.002 4.619 8.70 2.25 1.31 450.50 293.26 0.003 4.656 9.70 2.09 1.22 461.12 293.59 0.004 4.693 10.70 1.96 1.15 470.00 291.99 0.005 4.730 11.70 1.85 1.08 477.42 288.74 0.006 4.766 12.70 1.76 1.03 483.57 284.07 0.007 4.803 13.70 1.67 0.98 488.61 278.15 0.009 4.839 14.70 1.60 0.93 492.68 271.12 0.009 4.874 15.70 1.53 0.89 495.88 263.11 0.010 4.910 16.70 1.47 0.86 498.30 254.22 0.011 4.945 17.70 1.42 0.83 500.02 244.53 0.012 4.980 18.70 1.37 0.80 501.09 234.10 0.013 5.015 19.70 1.32 0.77 501.59 223.01 0.014 5.049 20.70 1.28 0.75 501.55 211.31 0.015 5.083 21.70 1.24 0.73 501.01 199.04 0.016 5.117 22.70 1.20 0.70 500.02 186.24 0.017 5.151 23.70 1.17 0.68 498.60 172.96 0.018 5.185 24.70 1.14 0.67 496.79 159.22 0.019 5.218 . 25.70 1.11 0.65 494.61 145.06 0.020 5.251 26.70 1.08 0.63 492.09 130.49 0.021 5.284 27.70 1.06 0.62 489.24 115.55 0.022 5.317 28.70 1.03 0.60 486.08 100.26 0.023 5.349 29.70 1.01 0.59 482.64 84.63 0.024 5.381 30.70 0.99 0.58 478.93 68.69 0.025 5.414 31.70 0.97 0.57 474.96 52.44 0.026 5.446 32.70 0.95 0.56 470.74 35.91 0.027 5.477 33.70 0.93 0.54 466.30 19.11 0.028 5.509 34.70 0.91 0.53 461.63 2.05 0.029 5.540 35.70 0.90 0.52 456.75 -15.26 0.030 5.571 36.70 0.88 0.52 451.67 -32.80 0.031 5.602 37.70 0.87 0.51 446.40 -50.56 0.032 5.633 38.70 0.85 0.50 440.95 -68.55 0.033 5.664 39.70 0.84 0.49 435.32 -86.74 0.034 5.695 40.70 0.82 0.48 429.52 -105.12 0.035 5.725 41.70 0.81 0.47 423.56 -123.70 0.036 5.755 42.70 0.80 0.47 417.45 -142.46 0.037 5.785 43.70 0.79 0.46 411.18 -161.40 0.038 5.815 44.70 0.77 0.45 404.77 -180.51 0.039 5.845 45.70 0.76 0.45 398.23 -199.79 0.040 5.874 • N:\3959\005\Storm\Pond C.As 2 OF 2 PRINTED: 2/6/2006 MMI#: 3959.005 • DATE: 1/25/2006 ENGINEER: Chris Wasia DESCRPTION: West Boundary Inlets MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT i=A*(Tc/60)_B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) RAINFALL FREQ= 25 YR(DURATION= 1) BASIN AREA PRE= 6.78 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY (YR) A B (IN/HR) PRE-DEV Tc=i 72 0]MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.58 5 0.52 0.64 0.87 PRE-DEV C=1 0.20 10 0.64 0.65 1.08 25 0.78 0.64 1.30 STORM A= 0.78 50 0.92 0.66 1.56 B= 0.64 100 1.01 0.67 1.72 STORM INTENSITY= 1.30 1N/HR . PRE-DEV Qp= 1.76 CFS • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD West Boundary Inlets Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 6.78 AC POST-DEV Tc= 22?OMIN POST-DEV C= 0.45:. STORM INTENSITY= 1.48 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 4.52 CFS DURATIO: • • Culvert Calculator Report Swale & Boylan • Solve For:Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 39.00 ft Headwater Depth/Height 1.01 Computed Headwater Elevi 39.00 ft Discharge 30.40 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev. 38.89 ft Tailwater Elevation 36.00 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 39.00 ft Control Type Entrance Control Grades Upstream Invert 36.75 ft Downstream Invert 35.75 ft Length 90.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Hydraulic Profile Profile S2 Depth,Downstream 1.09 ft Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.07 ft Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 1.39 ft Velocity Downstream 8.69 ft/s Critical Slope 0.004941 ft/ft Section Section Shape Arch Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Section Material Concrete Span 3.65 ft • Section Size 43.75 x 26.62 inch Rise 2.22 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 39.00 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.72 ft Ke 0.20 Entrance Loss 0.14 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev. 38.89 ft Flow Control Unsubmerged Inlet TypeGroove end w/headwall(arch) Area Full 6.3 ft' K 0.00180 HDS 5 Chart 0 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 0 C 0.02920 Equation Form 1 Y 0.74000 Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc n:\3959\005\storm\project2.cvm Morrison-Maierle Inc CulvertMaster v3.0[3.0003] 02/06/06 02:47:27 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Culvert Calculator Report Swale & Northview • Solve For:Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 34.00 ft Headwater Depth/Height 2.08 Computed Headwater Elew 34.00 ft Discharge 72.54 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev. 33.52 ft Tailw.ater Elevation 29.50 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 34.00 ft Control Type Outlet Control Grades Upstream Invert 30.10 ft Downstream Invert 28.90 ft Length 190.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.006316 ft/ft Hydraulic Profile Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile Depth,Downstream 1.62 ft Slope Type Mild Normal Depth N/A ft Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 1.62 ft Velocity Downstream 8.79 ft/s Critical Slope 0.009854 ft/ft Section Section Shape Arch Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Section Material Concrete Span 3.02 ft Section Size 36.25 x 22.5 inch Rise 1.87 ft Number Sections 2 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 34.00 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.04 ft Ke 0.20 Entrance Loss 0.21 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev. 33.52 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Groove end projecting(arch) Area Full 8.8 ftz K 0.00450 HDS 5 Chart 0 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 0 C 0.03170 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 Project Engineer: Morrison-Maierle Inc n:\3959\005\storm\project2.cvm Morrison-Maierle Inc CulvertMaster v3.0[3.00031 02/06/06 02:47:44 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet • Worksheet for Gutter Section • Project Description Worksheet 1.5%Gutter Type Gutter Secti< Solve For Spread Input Data Channel Slope 015000 ft/ft Discharge 1.00 cfs Gutter Width 2.00 ft Gutter Cross Slol 0.060 ft/ft Road Cross Slop 0.030 ft/ft Mannings Coeffic 0.013 Results Spread 4.10 ft Flow Area 0.3 ft' Depth 0.18 ft Gutter Depress 0.7 in Velocity 3.20 ft/s • • Project Engineer: Morrison-Maierle Inc n:\3959\005\storm\street capacity.fm2 Morrison-Ma ierle Inc FlowMaster v7.0[7.0005] 02/06/06 02:48:47 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet • Worksheet for Irregular Channel • Project Description Worksheet Alley Section Flow Element Irregular Cham Method Manning's Forr Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope 014000 ft/ft Water Surface Elev. 0.45 ft Options Current Roughness Methc>ved Lotter's Method Open Channel Weighting wed Lotter's Method Closed Channel Weightin( Horton's Method Results Mannings Coeffic 0.013 Elevation Range ).00 to 0.45 Discharge 33.76 cfs Flow Area 6.8 ft' Wetted Perimetei 30.01 ft Top Width 30.00 ft Actual Depth 0.45 ft Critical Elevation 0.57 ft Critical Slope 0,003568 ft/ft Velocity 5.00 ft/s Velocity Head 0.39 ft Specific Energy 0.84 ft Froude Number 1.86 Flow Type supercritical Roughness Segments Start End Mannings Station Station Coefficient -0+15 0+15 0.013 Natural Channel Points Station Elevation (ft) (ft) -0+15 0.45 0+00 0.00 0+15 0.45 • Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc n:\3959\005\storm\street capacity.fm2 Morrison-Maierle Inc FlowMaster v7.0[7.00051 02/06/06 02:48:59 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description Worksheet Street Section Flow Element Irregular Chani Method Manning's Fon Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope 005000 ft/ft Water Surface Elev. 0.75 ft Options Current Roughness Methc)ved Lotter's Method Open Channel Weighting wed Lotter's Method Closed Channel Weighting Horton's Method Results Mannings Coeffic 0.022 Elevation Range .00 to 1.00 Discharge 55.62 cfs Flow Area 22.4 ft2 Wetted Perimetei 60.83 ft Top Width 60.00 ft Actual Depth 0.75 ft Critical Elevation 0.64 ft • Critical Slope 0.009990 ft/ft Velocity 2.49 ft/s Velocity Head 0.10 ft Specific Energy 0.85 ft Froude Number 0.72 Flow Type Subcritical Roughness Segments Start End Mannings Station Station Coefficient -0+45 -0+16 0.030 -0+16 0+16 0.013 0+16 0+45 0.030 Natural Channel Points Station Elevation (ft) (ft) -0+45 1.00 -0+30 0.75 -0+16 0.50 -0+16 0.00 0+00 0.32 0+16 0.00 0+16 0.50 0+30 0.75 0+45 1.00 Project Engineer:Morrison-Maierle Inc n:\3959\005\storm\street capacity.fm2 Morrison-Maierle Inc FlowMaster v7.0[7.0005] 02/06/06 02:49:26 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 e�7 r • • M • Parks and Recreational Facilities �• • LEGENDS AT RID GER CI& EK II 75' WATERCOURSE SETBACK �I PARK / OPEN SPACE ,,, GROUND TRUTHED 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN h 75' WETLAND SETBACK DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE _ __ C7 OYL,AN-ROAD • ' 1 1 C a \ MAIDEN SPIRIT ST. � Ala v _ v� I ✓'�- �_ / b / GEFIELD CT. EDI it HEEL LNG 1 _�� ` f - BOYLAN R A o r MIDFIELD ST. ' J 71 A e n a PARKLAND DEDICATION TOTAL AREA 4.35 Ac. (189,680 SgFt) PARKLAND REQUIRED = 3.78 Ac. (126 units x 0.03) UDO — 18.50.060 — ADDITIONAL PARKLAND REQUIREMENT = 0.26 Ac. PARKLAND DEDICATION w/ WETLANDS TOTAL PARKLAND REQUIRED = 4.04 Ac. WETLAND AREA = 7.0 Ac. (305,051 SgFt) TOTAL AREA = 4.35 Ac. + 7.0 Ac. =11.35 Ac. OPENSPACE LWC LEGENDS TOTAL AREA Lw wmi MNSMTW,UC BRIDGER CREEK II +®a mmm srrt a emo n yru �po0 5asem r�(aq 12.498 Ac. (544,403 SgFt) CLIENT:EDGEFIELD PARK -OPEN SPACE DETAIL FIELD WORK•MMI DATE;12/02/05 PLOTTED DATE: Feb/15/2006 DRAWN BY: MEE SCALE:1=200 DRAWING NAME: ePROECTp95e/002/ACAD/MB37S/SmccT SEVIONSwD.oxc CHECKED BY--MEE PROD .LEGEND511 SHEET PACE OF T-PAGE � � N • DEQ Exemptions 0 0 Request for Exemption From MDEQ Review The applicant will request a Municipal Facilities Exclusion from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). The project schedule calls for water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure to be completed during the summers of 2006 and 2007. A detailed grading/ storm drainage plan for the Legends at Bridger Creek II Subdivision is included in this PUD submittal. CADocuments and Settings\mekstrom\PROJECTS\3959\002\DOCS\Pre-plat\PUD\Exemption from MDEQ Review.doc