Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300223276953964) i i r $1 y a 4 t t• bia `g1•`•' mar �. 'L6� 1' ♦ ,y4 :L-4)N* • _'7l �! is2. x ry �5• Z-92117 Simkins Hallin PUD 300 Block North Broadway Westland Corp.,Applicant September 4, 1992 M r ,. y" PROJECT ACTIVITY LOBS BOZEMAN CITY—COUNTY PLANNING OFt=ICE V Project Name _ 'May \ !1 c��\��l`� File No. STAFF i S'?"AF'F—�—CUMtJLAT I VL-1, I LATE ACTIVITY PERSON i HOURS SlA" r, TIME i _ 1� , z 4S Aso_ -- -v2LCI (� �- ---- - -- - — I FILE REVIEW SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Application Date: I �1�2 Staff Member: File Number: Z -�12�1—( Reference Files: Z- 9�i17A File Name: � M\(_� tlS ' DATE DONE BY Staff/Agency Comment Requested : Staff/Agency-Comment Deadline: ; Public Hearing Notice ; To Chronicle: ' Public Hearing Not.ice ; In Chronicle: Public Hearing Notice Sent To Adjacent Property Owners: ; Public Hearing Notice Posted : ; Staff Report Due: ; Staff Report (packet) Sent Out: Planning Board Meeting : ; Action: City Commission Meeting : ; Action: Letter To. Applicant ; Regarding Decision : ; 6 Month Review Due: ; 12 Month Review Due: Letter of Credit Received : Letter of Credit Released : ; Final CUP Issued : MISC\REVIEW.CUP MEMO ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: DRC MEMBERS , CRAIG BRAWNER, KYLE HARLAN, DAN FIGGINS, PHILLIP FORBES, FRED SHIELDS, ROGER SICZ FROM: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1992 RE: P.U.D. APPLICATION #Z-92117 , SIMKINS-HALLIN FSP ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please find attached, a copy of the approved and signed Simkins-Hallin PUD Final Site Plans, and a list of Conditions of Approval , as approved by the City Commission. I have attached where applicable the written comments pertaining to the Conditions, as received from the DRC member during the third week of review, and highlighted the corresponding Conditions of Approval . K I ! �t � 1 i1 IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR WESTLAND CORPORATION FOR SIMKINS-HALLIN THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 1992 , by and between Westland Corporation , hereinafter called the "Developer" , and the City of Bozeman, a Municipal Corporation of. the State of Montana, hereinafter called the "City" . WHEREAS , it is the intent and purpose of the Developer to meet the conditions of approval of a Conditional Use Permit application . for a Planned Unit Development allowing construction of -an 11 , 800 sq. ft . main floor retail sales and office building , with 1 , 920 square feet of second floor level office space , and related parking and site improvements on the property in question ; and WHEREAS , it is the intent of the Developer to obtain Final Site Plan approval ; and WHEREAS , it is the intent and purpose of both the Developer and -the City to hereby enter into an Agreement which will guarantee the full and satisfactory completion of the required improvements on the property hereinafter. described; and it is the intent of this Agreement , and of the parties hereto , to satisfy the improvements guarantee requirements for the Final Site Plan appr. ova_ of said Planned Unit Development . NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows : 1 i 1 . Property Description This Agreement pertains to , and includes those properties which are designated and identified as Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive , in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing I approximately 3 . 98 acres in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. 2 . Improvements This Agreement specifically includes the installation of landscaping , landscape irrigation systems , paving , curbing and headers , sidewalks , stor.mwater detention/retention basin( s ) , water main extensions , and other improvements as illustrated on the plans and specifications hereto attached and made a part of this i Agreement , as "Exhibit A" . The estimated cost of said improvements is attached and made a part of this Agreement , as "Exhibit B" . I i 3 . Financial Guarantee , Time for Completion of Improvements If the use of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of the improvements , the improvements must be secured by a financial guarantee , as may be deemed acceptable by the City, payable to the City of Bozeman, in an amount equal to one and one- half times the estimated cost of the installation of any required improvements not completed. at this -time . Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve ( 12 ) months . In any event , all required improvements on the site as delineated on Exhibit "A" , (Approved Final Site Plan) , Exhibit "B" , (Estimated Cost For Final Improvements ) , and Exhibit "B-1 " , Estimated Cost For Landscape Imprrovements ) , which are attached and made a part of this 2 f Agreement , shall be completed within. nine ( 9 ) months of occupancy in order to avoid default on the method of security. 4 . Inspection Representatives of the City shall have the right to enter upon the property at any reasonable time in order to inspect it and to determine if the Developer is in compliance with this Agreement , and the Developer shall permit the City and its representatives to enter upon and inspect the property at any reasonable time . 5 . Default Time is of the essence of this Agreement . If the Developer shall default in or fail to fully perform any of its obligations in conformance with the time schedule under this Agreement , and such default or failure shall continue for a period of thirty ( 30 ) days after written notice specifying the default is deposited in the United States mail addressed to the Developer at 124 North Wallace , Bozeman, MT 597*15 , or such other address as the Developer shall provide to the City from time to time , without being completely remedied , satisfied. , and discharged , the City may elect to enforce any of the following specified remedies : A ) The City may, at its option, declare the financial guarantee to be forfeited and secure the complete construction and inspection of the improvements described herein. 1 . The City' s representative , contractors , and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work and inspection, and the Developer shall permit and secure any additional permission .required. to enable them to do SO . B ) The City may enforce any other remedy provided by law. 3 6 . Warranty The Developer shall warrant against defects in these improvements for a period of one year from the date of their written acceptance by the Governing Body. Any required landscaping must be maintained in a healthy, growing condition at all times . Any plant that dies must be replaced with another living plant that complies with the approved landscape plan . 7 . Governing Law This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Montana. 8 . Modifications or Alterations No modifications or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid , unless evidenced by a writing signed by the parties hereto . 9 . Invalid Provision The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof , and this Agreement shall be construed in all .respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted . 10 . No Assignment It is expressly agreed that the Developer shall not assign this Agreement in whole , or in part , without prior written consent to City. 11 . Successors Fxcept as provided in paragraph 10 , this. Agreement shall be I binding upon, enure to the benefit of. , and be enforceable by the 4 parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns . WESTLAND CORPOR ION By: Thomas R. Simkins , Vice President of Westland Corporation, Bozeman, MT STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss County of Gallatin ) On this � day of �0 ��7� , 1992 , before me , a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Tom Simkins , known to me to be the Vice President of Westland Corporation in Bozeman, Montana, the corporation that executed the foregoing Improvements Agreement and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first written above . Notary ublic for State of Montana Residing at : Pn; Commission Expires : ( SEAL) THE CITY OF BOZEMAN Phillip J. ' rbe Director o Public Service STATE OF MONTANA 1 : ss County of Gallatin ) On the _ L-L— day of fi"&C'4W , 1992 , before me , a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Phillip J. Forbes , known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as Director of Public Service of the City of Bozeman, whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above . 44'-t'W L-� IOXA� Notary ublic f r ate of Montana. Residi . - Commission Expi.r. s : ( SEAL ) / 5 MEMORANDUM November 18 , 1992 To: Dave Grigsby, Assistant Planner From: Craig E. Brawner, City Engineer Re: Simkins-Hallin PUD - FSP Review I have reviewed the FSP and Improvements Cost Estimate submitted November 16 , 1992 for the above-referenced project and have the following comments on the conditions of approval (numbers correspond to November 2 , 1992 letter to Mr . Simkins) associated with this Department : 4 . Condition satisfied. j 5. Please assure the required waivers have been received and filed. 6. Stormwater calculations are satisfactory; however, the requested Maintenance Plan and the provisions for the final discharge destination (i .e. drainage swale to Mill Ck. ) have not been addressed. Additionally, I would recommend the detention pond discharge structure/point of discharge shown on the RME drainage plan be relocated to the east end of the pond (as shown on Sheet Al) wherein the discharge will avoid Fridley St. and associated conflicts (i .e. curb and gutter, etc. ) . 7 , 8 & 9 . Plans and specifications for the water main and subsequent installation have not progressed at this point , but FSP approval was not contingent these conditions , though building occupancy is . 10 . Defer to Water/ Sewer Superintendent , Fred Shields . 11 . Sidewalk on Broadway is depicted on FSP and the need for a permit also indicated. While a Sidewalk/Curb-cut Permit has not been obtained as conditioned, I am willing to defer permitting so long as a permit is obtained prior to initiation of sidewalk and curb-cut work . 12 . Condition Satisfied. 13 . Appears to be satisfied; however I would note that the "enlarged-scale" site plan provided does not depict the gates or barricades shown on the previous plan to prevent drive aisle use. 14 . Condition satisfied. Page 2 Simkins-Hallin Memo November 18 , 1992 15 . Plans and specifications for entire Fridley Street will be required (as conditioned) prior to paving the 24 ' access portion of the R/W . No P&S have been submitted. The Architect had indicated to me that the owner intended to pursue a street vacation; however no request has been made at this time. I feel the FSP approval can be given and the matter resolved prior to occupancy. 16. The current FSP does not show the new water line easements. 17 . Condition Satisfied. In summary, several conditions remain to be addressed (i . e . Nos . 7 , 8 , 9., 11 , & 15) however they can be or were expected to be satisfied prior to occupancy. I would say only conditions #6 , and #16 remain unsatisfied. I am willing to accept FSP approval (and building permit issuance) with verbal assurance from the Architect and Engineer that conditions #6 and #16 be resolved as noted above within 30 day maximum time. Additionally the owner and A&E need to expeditiously pursue compliance with the remaining unaddressed conditions (Nos . 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 15) to avoid future delays with the project . I have attached the FSP documents , and completed and signed the The Estimated Cost for Improvements form for the project . MEMORANDUM ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: DRC MEMBERS , CRAIG BRAWNER, KYLE HARLAN, DAN FIGGINS , PHILLIP FORBES , FRED SHIELDS , ROGER SICZ FROM : DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 18 , 1992 RE: P.U.D. APPLICATION #Z-92117 , SIMKIN HALLIN ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please find attached, the Simkin-Hallin PUD Final Site Plans , and a list of Conditions of Approval , as approved by the City Commission. I have attached where applicable the written comments pertaining to the Conditions , as received from the DRC member during the third week of review, and highlighted the corresponding Conditions of Approval . As ,you are aware , the applicant is trying his best to .get the new structure out of the ground before winter conditions prevent it . Any help in .expeditin.g this process would be appreciated . The FSP will be placed on the agenda for Final Approval, after the Planning Office has received ,your written comments . MEMORANDUM ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: CRAIG BRAWNER, CITY ENGINEER FROM: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 16 , 1992 RE: SIMKINS-HALLIN, FSP ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please find attached, the Simkins-Hallin Final Site Plan and a copy of the conditions dated 9/18/92 , requested by your office to be attached to any approval of the Simkin-Hallin P.U. D. I have also included a complete list of Conditions of Approval , as approved by the City Commission, and which were sent to the applicant in the letter dated 11/2/92 . i I I Please review the conditions and the drainage plans , and notify me as soon as possible if there are any problems . I have requested that an enlarged site plan of the proposed new retail store and parking improvements be submitted as a part of the Final Site Plan, because some of the details ( ie . asphalt or concrete headers ) on the submitted FSP are difficult to read at the scale which they have been printed. I expect to have that additional sheet shortly and I will forward one copy to you as soon as I receive them. I I i "EXHIBIT B" ESTIMATED COST FOR IMPROVEMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE: Z PROJECT: -� y�_�,, s _ ,��w�,v P, u, y z- Z 117 DEVELOPER: (n Coe. Pa2ff-to�,j Item Sq.Ft , /Ln Ft Cost Per Unit Est , Cost p Paving:Asphalt ! 5 , 35y SF � I � lor 6 5, 3-59. o0 Concrete �(Us 95 9 s Z- 7 o Sidewalks : 3 9 7/ 5F !. 5F- Curbing: 10317. ; L F 857/. 75 Landscape: 5�� �����i�, g-� " 6a rr N�� 88 B . 07 Landscape Protection: Garbage Enclosure: Exterior Lighting: Water Improvements : 17�5 i-F 0,3o t l�vd s �� ��� ��s` ?� LVo Sewer Improvements : Street Improvements : /oo 4-.F� 7Q) 7,90 . oo . • � X /.S _ �/l9i 79D .oa �l Approved By City Engineering Office: Date : � � 7 �z "EXHIBIT B-1" ESTIMATED COST FOR LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE: November 16 , 1992 PROJECT : Simkins-Hallin P. U. D. , Application 4Z-92117 DEVELOPER: Westland Corporation ----------------------------------------------------------------- LANDSCAPE ITEM S . F. LN . F. COST UNIT EST. COST Grass 12 , 477 S . F. 00 . 21/S . F. 2620 . 17 Decorative Rock 2 , 010 S . F. 00 . 39/S . F. 783 . 90 TREES/SHRUBS NO. UNITS COST/UNIT EST. COST 2 . 5" Fr. axinus Pennsylvanica 11 275 . 00 3025 . 00 1 . 25'' Populus Tremuloides 9 49 . 00 441 . 00 1.8-24"Juniperos Horizont.alis 85 22 . 00 1870 . 00 8-1.0 ' Pinus Sylvestris 2 49 . 00 98 . 00 ----------------------------------------------------------------- B-1 TOTAL 8838 . 07 i 1 Cl p /V0_�Pb_8 So�tJ_ 41 �° �.I''a✓-G_(,l.t�� 2o_v—a��/�c.U_e,.c.J_�i—t S 3v �e few►^{-L'ca�(R� a�.o+�5�c-Uvr why 1 M � l S O�arf' ✓�c-��r_C,� Via' e7 L-rW 6eAV F.•�-� F- o F l{moo�P SPAS D-A 140 1 1 r r - . _ Y �r 19� RECEIVED OF ollars FOR _ _60 Shelley M. Cheney, Clerk do Recorder Gallatin County S By: Deputy R� UN c� b��r- 11 J I ,_ • WAIVER OF RIGHT TO PROTEST CREATION OF SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS FOR THE SIGNALIZATION OF THE INTERSECTION OF PEACH STREET AND ROUSE AVENUE We , the undersigned , owners of the real property situated in Bozeman, County of Gallatin; State of Montana, . and more particularly described as follows : Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive , in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County , Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3 . 98 acres in the Northern Pacific Addition to ,Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. IN CONSIDERATION of receiving Final Site Plan approval for a . Conditional use Permit for a Planned Unit Development from the City of. Bozeman, along with accompanying rights and privileges and for other and valuable consideration, the receipt of which .is hereby acknowledged , do hereby waive , for ourselves , our heirs , personal representatives , successors and assigns , the right to protest the creation or formation of one or more special improvement district or districts for the signalization of the intersection of Peach Street and Rouse Avenue , that may become assessable under a duly passed resolution to create such a special improvement district , or districts under applicable Montana statutes , which would include the above-described property. This waiver shall be a covenant running with the land and shall not expire . 1 page 2 of 2 . . . Waiver of Right to Protest Creation of A Special Improvement District for the Signalization of Peach Street and Rouse Avenue We warrant that we are lawfully seized and possessed of the real property described above and that we have a lawful right to convey the property or any part of it. DATED this day of 19 WESTLAND CORPORATION By Thomas R. Simkins , Vice President of Westland Corporation, Bozeman, MT STATE OF MONTANA 1 : ss County of On this day of , 19 , before me , a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Thomas R. Simkins , known to me to be the Vice President of Westland Corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing Waiver of Right to Protest , and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and set my seal the day and year first above written . Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at Bozeman , Montana My Commission Expires : ( SEAL ) 2 WAIVER OF RIGHT TO PROTEST CREATION OF SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO FRONT STREET We , the undersigned , owners of the real property situated in Bozeman , County of Gallatin, State of Montana, and more particularly described as follows : Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive , in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman , Gallatin County , Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3 . 98 acres in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. IN CONSIDERATION of receiving Final Site Plan approval for a Conditional use Permit for a Planned Unit Development from the City of Bozeman , along with accompanying rights and privileges and for other and valuable consideration , the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged , do hereby waive , for ourselves , our heirs , personal representatives , successors and assigns , the right to protest the creation or formation of one or more special improvement district or districts for improvements to Front Street including curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage , and paving improvements that may become assessable under• a duly passed resolution to create such a special improvement district , or districts under applicable Montana statutes , which would include the above-described property. This waiver shall be a covenant running with the land and shall not expire . 1 • 1 page 2 of 2 . . . Waiver. of Right to Protest Creation of A Special Improvement District for Improvements to Front Street We warrant that we are lawfully seized and possessed of the real property described above and that we have a lawful right to convey the property or any part of it. DATED this day of , 19 WESTLAND CORPORATION By Thomas R. Simkins , Vice President of Westland Corporation, Bozeman, MT STATE OF MONTANA 1 : ss County of ) On this day of 19 before me , a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Thomas R. Simkins , known to me to be the Vice President of Westland Corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing Waiver of Right to Protest , and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and set my seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at Bozeman, Montana My Commission Expires : ( SEAL ) 2 s . •S P -E E D W11t0''' Ones® Carbonless o MESSAGE 44-911,` Snap-A-Way Forms S .PEED MESSAGE TO -y-- FROM -�� S,A-t K,1-15 — �{t�c_L/rnl Jl- SUBJECT �i�cf lJEE2-S "�� 7�KDT•�`ST- � ( 1'7 �S DATE va IL �n S/gyi �'"�P GfJd/l/Pl�'� �vl d -f-i �>o ��y.�,� (��.�-�� ���► tcn e/P 1-4-- 4- -h!2 T'-/sl a Sl /I- P/a7 17 I SIGNED DUPLICATE wltsondones•corboeiew•MADE IN USA 60-911 ThpliCele .ar��►++io:I.�cir.+c�i�i+. ���.=:ir-... __ - - -�.-a-.�.e_ __ _._�.s_.+.'. _.s.� _r�.+:..f a�.--- rr�.-:�.-.��_��,.a.ri,--t: ..-��c.���:Y �_�r �� O - _ _ A�FCCA(:F 4q :11 ---- `• -- - -- - = - - _ - - - �., P_A-Way" Forms --�- �.�. SPEED MESSAGE TO �—�^— FROM 1-46 K��s �4�.1 v �d ✓�h Q a, �a,�) �z� ��.-r., C,�-�=ten, . )rs- a 2A Ac A_,A h: ;,SUBJECT `/1A l 7-4,,':e' "=_-r- G t );:2 �' DATE -7L! Ole o Yv -t�iVan r r c rT— -74 F I SIGNED4 / /WIISonJones•Carbonla •MADE IN USA TRIPLICATE AA-9n Triplicate BOZEMAD. CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE BOZEMAN 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE CITY-COUNTY P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 PLANNING OFFICE PHONE:(406)586-3321 Ext.227 Tom Simkins November 5 , 1992 Westland Corporation 124 North Wallace Avenue RE: Simkins-Hallin P.U. D. , Improvements Agreement Dear Tom: Please find enclosed the Improvements Agreement for the Simkins-Hallin P.U. D. , for your review and approval . The Planning Staff will be unable to complete the "Estimated Costs for Improvements" portion ( "Exhibit B" ) of the agreement until we have a copy of the Final Site Plans. Please be sure to include all improvements to the site , including the additional landscaping bordering on North Broadway and buffering from the adjacent residential area, as per the Conditions- of Approval . Please be advised that seven copies of the Final Site Plans , showing all improvements and meeting all of the conditions, must be submitted to the Planning Office within six months of the date of the City Commission Approval . In order to expedite the process , you may wish to have your licensed Architect estimate and submit the "Estimated Costs for Improvements" along with the Final Site Plans , which would be accepted by the Planning Office for inclusion in the Improvements Agreement as "Exhibit B" . Please read the Improvements Agreement and if you are in agreement to the terms as set forth therein , please sign and return the Agreement to the Planning Office . I Please also find enclosed the two waivers of right to protest the creation of S . I . D. ' s , which were listed under Condition 45 , and which must be signed and filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder prior to Final Site Plan Approval . I If you have any questions regarding the Improvements Agreement , the waivers , or this letter, please contact me at the Planning Office . S ' erely, i David Grigsby Assistant Planner cc : Dan Kamp I I BOZEMAN* s A �,4 CITY-COUNTY �` PLANNING OFFICE BOZEMAN 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE CITY-COUNTY P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 PLANNING OFFICE PHONE:(406)586-3321 Ext. 227 Tom Simkins November 2 , 1992 Westland Corporation 124- North Wallace Avenue RE: Simkins-Hall-in P.U. D. Dear Tom: As you are aware , on October 26 , 1992 , the Bozeman City Commission approved your application 4Z-9.2117 , for a Conditional Use Permit for` a Planned Unit Development . The proposal was conditionally approved with the following attached conditions : ( * please note Conditions �27 and i28 , and the amended versions of Conditions i5 and ill .. which were added in response to directions from the City Commission at the October 19 , 1992 hearing ) 1 . That the apulicant submit a revised site plan to the Planning Office identifying the following landsca_e related items , prior to Final Site Plan approval : A . All of the interior landscape islands shall be landscaped with the plantings as shown , and shall be seeded in grass or sod and noted on the FSP; B. All landscaped areas shall be provided a hose bib or a.deauate underground irrigation system located within each landscaped area , and identified on the FSP; C. Landscaping , including Boulevard trees (.-here app] i.cable ) , grass , screening , and buffering requirements shall be installed the entire length of the Urc-Derty bordering ?north Broadway ( excluding: drive accesses ) , and along the subject property borderini�'.'the residences to the South , a'nd shall be located. and . ider,tif i ed' on the :F.SP ; . D,; the :to.t. I. o.f:::e:ac,h.:.1.a.rid-sc-aped`ar.Ea::sHal`}..c:onta.i.n, not. 7.'eas ...... ........ .. . than 75% live w'eg.etat-ion. and:­grourid. .cove.r,:.._ E. Unless Fridley street is vacated , there shall be one more large canopy tree bordering Friedley street and shown can the FSP; i 2 . That the aupl.icant submit a .revised site plan identif.�ing all droppe.d ' curbs ; continuous cu-rbi:ng-, wheel stoiys h4ndic•api:)ed accessible ramps, } " . wide painted str.i:pi-n'Lj fox -rep iew .=end approval liv the PIanning. Office prior to.. Final Site Plan ...approval f 3 . All interior sidewalks shall be raised above parking lot surface the height of a standard continuous curb, and noted on the FSP; 4 . "No Parking" signs shall be installed along the length of the drive isle bordering the sidewalk at the front of the new retail store ; *5 . The applicant shall file waivers of protest to the creation of an S . I . D. for " _.: 4 in ... i ,� tee ft T�_�: �e-�-ram--t--r rtei route future improvements to Front Street , and for the creation of an S . I . D. for the signalization of the intersection of Peach and Rouse ; 6 . The Stormwater Drainage/Treatment Plan basin sizing and discharge calculations , discharge destination , and a stor.mwater maintenance plan must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer; 7 . PIa.ns and Specifications for the water main extensions prepared by a Professional Engineer ( PE ) shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences . The applicant small also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection , Post-Constr.uct.i.on Certification . and preparation of mylar Record Drawings ; 8 . Pla.ns and Specifications for any proposed water main and hydrants , or fire service line must be prepared by a Professional Engineer ( PE ) , and be provided to and approved by both the State W.O. B. and the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the water main and hydrants , or fire service or fire protection system . The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for the Construction Inspection , Post-Construction Certification , and preparation of mylar Record Drawings ; 9 . That the proposed water main and hydrants as shown on the plans and submitted to the State W.Q. B. and the City Engineer, be installed and in service prior to occupancy of the new buil.di.ne , and that no occupancy permi.ts shall be gra-nted nor. a.nv Financial guarantees accepted prior to said installation and completion of the service ; 1.0 . Sewer and water ( domest.ic and/or fire ) services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sexc•er Superintendent. . City of Bozeman Applications for service shall be completed by the applicant ; j t , *11 . A _sidewalk shall be installed to City standards the length of , and within the North Broadwav street boulevard bordering the property, and shown on the FSP ; and ire the sidewalks and parking lot approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City ' s standard approach ( i . e . concrete apron, sidewalk section , and drop-curb ) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval ; 1.2 . Asphalt or Concrete headers shall be provided around the perimeter of all new asphalt not contained by a concrete curb; 1.3 . The configuration of the off-street parking area shall comply with the requirements of 18 . 50 . 120 of the Zone Code unless a deviation or variance is granted by the governing body . In particular the narrow drive aisles between the buildings , and the NE access must meet code requirements for width; 14 . The extent of the previous Fridley Street vacation must be delineated ; 15 . Fridley Street shall be designed for paving to a City of Bozeman local street standard , including curb/gutter and sidewalk, and shall be completed, to a minimum width of 24 feet by the applicant in such a manner as to lend to future completion to the City :Standard ; Paving shall be completed to the eastern-most - parking lot access ; If Fridley is vacated the DRC recommends the adjoining property owners enter into an agreement for a shared access at the ex.i.stinq R./tip centerline ; 1.6 . All existing and proposed utility and other easements must be shown on the Final Site Plan . City standard form water line easements shall be filed by the property owner prior to FSP approval ; 17 . Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the access sight triangles , but on the subject property ( unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with -the County Clerk and Recorder ) ; 18 . That in the event the dust control/abatement program fails , and dust from the lot becomes a problem , that the applicant be rec_,ui.red to nave the truss plant employee parking lot as originally conditioned in the approval of the truss plant C . U. P. ; a ........ .... . CUP Conditions required by Section 18 . 53 . 030 . G 19 . The right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure ; 20 . That, all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use and shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns ; 21 . That all conditions specifically stated under any Conditional Use listed in this Ordinance shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land , successors or assigns ; 22 . That all of the special conditions shall be consented to in writing by the applicant ; Boiler Plate Conditions 23 . Seven copies of the Final. Site Plan containing all of the conditions , corrections , and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approved by the Planning Director within six months of the date of City Commission approval . Signed copies shall be retained by the City departments represented on the Development Review Committee , and one signed copy- shall be .retained by the applicant ; 24 . The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the ..installation of required on-site improvements at tide time of Final Si t.e Plan submittal . Detailed cost estimates , construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement ; 25 . The first. Building permit must be obtained within one year of Final Sit.,e Plan Approval . Building Permits , ill not be issued until. the Final Site Plan is approved . No site work ; including elcavation , may occur until a Building permit is issued . A separate Building permit must be obtained for signage , prior to installation of any s.ignage ; 26 . If occupancy of the struc-tur•e or commencement of the use is to occur prior to the installation of all improvements , the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of ti•,e scheduled improvements not yet installed . Said method of security shall. be valid for a period of not less than twel\•e. ( ] 2 ) months ; hoz,;e,,-er. , all on-site imp.ro;e.ment.s shall be completed by the aiapl. icant: %,-J t hip nine ( 9 ) rnonti;s of occupancy to avoid default on the of security: *27 . That the existing on-site structures bordering and facing North Broadway and the adjacent R-3A residential zone , be painted , or the siding be replaced with colored siding to match or compliment the proposed new retail structure . *28 . That all exterior lighting comply with all City standards for exterior lighting as set forth in Section 18 . 50 . 035A and Section 18 . 50 . 120B of the Code , and be shown in detail on the FSP. ----------------------------------------------------------------- The Planning Staff is in the process of drafting an Improvements Agreement for the Simkins Hal.lin P. U. D. which we hope to have completed and ready by the time you submit your revised Final Site Plans . If you have any questions regarding the Conditions or this letter, or anything related to the project , please feel free to contact me at the Planning Office . Since y , i i Dav rigsby Assistant Planner cc : Dan Kamp Cikan Architects , P. C. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA October 26, 1992 The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, October 26, 1992, at 3:30 p.m. Present were Mayor Swanson, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, City Manager Wysocki, City Attorney Luwe and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. None of the Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed for discussion. Minutes - October 19, 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that action on the minutes of the regular meeting of October 19, 1992, be delayed for a period of one week, so the corrections can be submitted in writing. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Decision - CUP for PUD - Westland Corporation - to allow construction of new retail building and relocation of offices and retail operation - Lot 18, Block 46, Lots 16 through 27, Block 49, Lots 1 through 8, Block 46 and Lots 9 through 16, Block 46, and an irregular shaped parcel containing 3.98 acres, Northern Pacific Addition (300 Block North Broadway) This was the time and place set for the decision on the application submitted by Westland Corporation for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, under Application No. Z-92117, to allow construction of a new retail building and relocation of offices and retail operation on Lot 18, Block 46, Lots 16 through 27, Block 49, Lots 1 through 8, Block 46, and Lots 9 through 16, Block 46, and an.irregular shaped parcel containing 3.98 acres located in the Northern Pacific Addition. The subject parcel is more commonly located in the 300 block of North Broadway Avenue. The City Manager reminded the Commission that the public hearing on this item was conducted at last week's meeting. He then noted that, included in the Commissioners' packets, 1 10-26-92 r - 2 - was a memo from Assistant Planner Dave Grigsby, dated October 22, forwarding two proposed additional conditions and revisions to two of the conditions forwarded by the City-County Planning Board, as a result of the public testimony and Commission discussion at last week's public hearing. At the Mayor's request, Planning Director Andy Epple reviewed the revised and added conditions as contained in the memo forwarded by Planner Grigsby. He noted that this planned unit development includes a mixture of retail, wholesale, manufacturing and storage. He stated that Condition No. 27 simply provides for painting or re-siding of the existing structures on the property to match or complement the new structure, as the applicant has already indicated he plans to do. 1 He also noted that Condition No. 28 simply requires that the lighting on the site be in compliance with the requirements of the City's zone code. He then indicated that Condition No. 5 is to be revised to refer to Front Street, rather than .its designation in the proposed transportation plan update of "arterial/peripheral truck route". He noted this is in response to a concern raised by some of the Commissioners that the transportation plan update has not yet been adopted by the City Commission; and it seems inappropriate to include some of the phraseology from that document in the approval of an application. He noted that Condition No. 11 has been revised to clarify its I i intent, which is to require the installation of sidewalks in conjunction with this application, rather i than at some time in the future. i Responding to Commissioner Knapp, the Planning Director stated that the applicant or future owners of the property must abide by the limits for noise level established in the zone code. Commissioner Knapp stated that, while she is not concerned about noise levels in conjunction with this applicant, she feels that the issue must be addressed for all applications, so it does not become forgotten. Responding to questions and concerns from Commissioner Frost, Planning Director Epple stated that Condition No. 15 would require that, if the East Fridley Street right-of-way is not vacated, the applicant will be required to pave it to a minimum width of 24 feet, in a design that will accommodate future upgrading to a City street standard. i Responding to Mayor Swanson, the Planning Director indicated that the conditions, as recommended, adequately reflect the Director of Public Service's suggestion that the looped water line.be completed prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Vincent, that the Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, under Application I' I 10-26-92 d 7 No. Z-92117, to allow construction of a new retail building and relocation of offices and retail operation on Lot 18, Block 46, Lots 16 through 27, Block 49, Lots 1 through 8, Block 46, and Lots 9 through 16, Block 46, and an irregular shaped parcel containing 3.98 acres located in the Northern Pacific Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1 . That the applicant submit a revised site plan to the Planning Office identifying the following landscape related items, prior to final site plan approval: A. All of the interior landscape islands shall be landscaped with the plantings as shown, and shall be seeded in grass or sod and noted on the final site plan; B. All landscaped areas shall be provided a hose bib or adequate underground irrigation system located within each landscaped area, and identified on the final site plan; C. Landscaping, including boulevard trees (where applicable), grass, screening, and buffering requirements shall be installed the entire length of the property bordering North Broadway Avenue (excluding drive accesses), and along the subject property bordering the residences to the south, and shall be located and identified on the final site plan; D. The total of each landscaped area shall contain not less than 75% live vegetation and ground cover; and E. Unless East Fridley Street is vacated, there shall be one more large canopy tree bordering Fridley Street and shown on the final site plan; 2. That the applicant submit a revised site plan identifying all dropped curbs, continuous curbing, wheel stops, handicapped accessible ramps, 4-inch wide painted striping, for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to final site plan approval; 3. All interior sidewalks shall be raised above parking lot surface the height of a standard continuous curb, and noted on the final site plan; 4. "No Parking" signs shall be installed along the length of the drive isle bordering the sidewalk at the front of the new retail store; 5. The applicant shall file waivers of protest to the creation of an S.I.D. for future improvements to Front Street, and for the creation of an S.I.D for the signalization of the intersection of Peach Street and Rouse Avenue; 6. The stormwater drainage/treatment plan basin sizing and discharge calculations, discharge destination, and a stormwater maintenance plan must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer; 7. Plans and specifications for the water main extensions prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. The applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings; 10-26-92 I 4 8. Plans and specifications for any proposed water main and hydrants, or fire service line must be prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE), and be provided to and approved by both the State Water Quality Bureau and the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the water main and hydrants, or fire service or fire protection system, The applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for the construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings; 9. That the proposed water main and hydrants as shown on the plans and submitted to the State Water Quality Bureau and the City Engineer, be installed and in service prior to occupancy of the new building, and that no occupancy permits shall be granted nor any financial guarantees accepted prior to said installation and completion of the service; 10. Sewer and water (domestic and/or fire) services shall be shown on the final site plan and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the applicant; 11 . A sidewalk shall be installed to City standards, the length of, and within the North Broadway Street boulevard bordering the property, and shown on the final site plan; and the sidewalks and parking lot approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach (i.e. concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb) and shown as such on the final site plan. A city curb cut and sidewalk permit shall be obtained prior to final site plan approval; 12. Asphalt or concrete headers shall be provided around the perimeter of all P new asphalt not contained by a concrete curb; 13. The configuration of the off-street parking area shall comply with the requirements of 18.50.120 of the Zone Code unless a deviation or variance is granted by the governing body. In particular the narrow drive aisles between the buildings, and the northeast access must meet code requirements for width; 14. The extent of the previous Fridley Street vacation must be delineated; 15. Fridley Street shall be designed for paving to a City of Bozeman local street standard, including curb/gutter and sidewalk, and shall be completed to a minimum width of 24 feet by the applicant in such a manner as to lend to future completion to the City standard. Paving shall be completed to the eastern-most parking lot access. If Fridley Street is vacated, the Design Review Committee recommends the adjoining property owners enter into an agreement for a shared access at the existing right-of-way centerline; 16. All existing and proposed utility and other easements must be shown on the final site plan. City standard form water line easements shall be filed by the property owner prior to final site plan approval; 17. Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the access sight triangles, but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder); 18. That in the event the dust control/abatement program fails, and dust from the lot becomes a problem, that the applicant be required to pave the truss plant employee parking lot as originally conditioned in the approval of the truss plant Conditional Use Permit; 10-26-92 19. That the existing on-site structures bordering and facing North Broadway Street and the adjacent R-3A residential zone, be painted, or the siding be replaced with colored siding to match or complement the proposed new retail structure; 20. That all exterior lighting comply with all City standards for exterior lighting as set forth in Section 18.50.035A and Section 18.50.120E of the Code, and be shown in detail on the final site plan; 21 . The right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure; 22. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use and shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns; 23. That all conditions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this ordinance shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns; 24. That all of the special conditions shall be consented to in writing by the applicant; 25. Seven copies of the final site plan containing all of the conditions, corrections, and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be, submitted for review and approved by the Planning- Director within six months of the date of City Commission approval. Signed copies shall be retained by the City departments represented on the Development Review Committee, and one signed copy shall be retained by the applicant; 26. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of final site plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that agreement; 27. The first building permit must be obtained within one year of final site plan approval. Building permits will not be issued until the final site plan is approved. No site work, including excavation, may occur until a building permit is issued. A separate building permit must be obtained for signage, prior to installation of any signage; and 28. If occupancy of the structure or commencement of the use is to occur prior to the installation of all improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve 0 2) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. 10-26-92 I Decision - Commission Resolution No. 2878 - intent to annex 13.0-acre tract known,as Parcel A and Parcel B. located in the W%, W% NE%. SW% and the E%, E%, NWY4, SWY Section 11. T2S, R5E, MPM ISchrenk annexation request, lying north of Main Mall and south of West Babcock Street This was the time and place set for the decision on Commission Resolution No. 2878, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2878 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY/OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF A� TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN, AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY/OF BOZEMAN SO AS A TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CIORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that the public hearing on this proposed h annexation was conducted at last weeks meeting. He then noted that, included in the Commissioners' packets, was a memo from Senior Planner Dave Skelton, dated October 21, forwardinga list of five items to be included in the annexation agreement, if the Commission . 9 decides that it wishes to continue the annexation�proccess. At the Mayor's request, Planning Director'E " le reviewed the contents of the memo. He Y q 9 ��eek's PPnoted that all of these issues were raised at last meeting, and include: 1 . Waivers of right to protest the"creation of SID's for pavement, curb, gutter, 9 sidewalk and storm drainage for West Babcock Street; 2. Waiver of right to rotest/creation of an SID for si9 nalization at the 9 P � . intersection of West Bbcock Street and West Main Street; 3. Cash in lieu of water right ayment, based on full development of the city- density'residential zoning proposed, 4. Payback to Mr. Harr Daum for use of the existing sanitary sewer line; and Y � Y 9 Y 5. Payback to SID No. 622 for connection to the existing water trunk line. City 9 Y Manager Wysocki characterized the situation with West Babcock Street as "a chicken and egg situation". He noted that it is important to have residents in the area participate in . improvements to West Babcock Street; and if they are not within the City's jurisdictional area, that makes the situation morid"ifficult. He stated that Citystaff is beginning discussions with the 9 9 County about improve�m/4s to West Babcock Street, and has drafted a letter to,the Montana Department of Trans"o% ation regarding si nalization at the intersection of West Babcock Street P � 9 9 9 and West Main Street. He noted the County has indicated that any improvements to that roadway must be undertaken in another budget year; and he feels it is important to get State participation 10-26-92 �P MEMORANDUM I -------------------------- ------------------------------------ TO: BOZEMAN CITY I Y COMMISSION FROM: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 22 , 1992 RE: SIMKINS-HALLIN PUD, APPLICATION #Z-92117 REVISED AND/OR NEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please find below a list of revised , as well as new conditions , compiled by the Planning Office for Zoning Application #Z-92117 -- Simkins-Hallin P.U. D. , which are a result of the public hearing held before the City Commission on Monday, October 19 , 1992 . The Planning Office recommends that the City Commission consider the following conditions in making any decision on the application. New Conditions to be added: 27 . That the existing on-site structures bordering and facing North Broadway and the adjacent R-3A residential zone , be painted, or the siding be replaced with colored siding to match or compliment the proposed new retail structure . I I 28 . That all exterior lighting comply with all City standards for exterior lighting as set forth in Section 18 . 50 . 035A and Section 18 . 50 . 120B of the Code , and be shown in detail on the FSP. Conditions to be amended: Condition 45 shall be amended to read as follows : 5 . The applicant shall file waivers of protest to the creation of an S . I .D. for " =tul—reutz future improvements to Front Street, and for the creation of an S . I .D. for the signalization of the intersection of Peach and Rouse ; Condition #11 shall be amended to read as follows : 11 . A sidewalk shall be installed to City standards , the length of , and within the North Broadway street boulevard bordering the property, and shown on the FSP; and T4re the sidewalks and parking lot approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City' s standard approach ( i . e . concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval . There was also some discussion of a possible "cost recovery" provision for the extension of the water main through this project . Inquiry by Staff has indicated that the new water main extension through the subject property, is for the protection of the said property and would probably not qualify for cost recovery. However, Staff had notified the applicant on February 17 , 1992 , that it may be possible to write such a cost-recovery provision for that portion of the water main extension that was installed as a result of the Truss plant C.U.P. The cost-recovery provision would need to be initiated by the applicant , and would be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Staff will be present at the hearing to answer any questions you may have on the Simkins-Hallin PUD. i reminded the Commission that repayment of the warrants for this sidewalk program has been set up on a five-year program. The City Manager then stated that the costs of the sidewalk installation have been billed at a rate of $2.75 per square foot for standard four-in"chisidewalk and $3.20 per square foot for i P q the six-inch sidewalk which is required across driveways. He noted that additional costs for y removal and replacement of trees and shrubs location of fire hydrants, etc., are also added to the costs for that articular parcel. He them'dicated that the rates for the work completed under P P / / this contract were competitive in today's market. No one was present to speak,/in support of or in opposition to this resolution setting the assessments for the 1991 sidewalko ram. /� P 9 It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Vincent, that the public hearing be closed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, C, missioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Mayor S nson closed the public hearing. k7 It wasoved by Commissioner Vincent, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, that the Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No. 2887, levying and assessing sidewalk assessment s�f o r 1991 sidewalk program. The motion carried b the following Aye and No vote: P 9 Y 9 Y those votin Aye being Commissioner Vincent Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost and 9 Y 9 � PP. Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Public hearing - CUP for PUD - Westland Corporation - to allow construction of new retail building and relocation of offices and retail operation - Lot 18, Block 46, Lots 16 through 27, Block 49, Lots 1 through 8, Block 46, and Lots 9 through 16, Block 46, and an irregular shaped parcel containing i 3.98 acres, Northern Pacific Addition 1300 Block North Broadway) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the application submitted by Westland Corporation for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, under Application No. Z-92117, to allow construction of a new retail building and relocation of offices and retail operation on Lot 18, Block 46, Lots 16 through 27, Block 49, Lots 1 through 8, Block 46, and Lots 9 through 16, Block 46, and an irregular shaped parcel containing 3.98 acres located in the Northern Pacific Addition. The subject parcel is more commonly located in the 300 block of North Broadway Avenue. 10-19-92 taxes, the City may pursue the tax deed process after a three-year period. He further noted that other options are to wait until the property changes hands, at which time the delinquencies will be satisfied, or possibly to seek legal remedies through a lawsuit. 9 9 No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the assessments for these delinquent snow removal charges. It was moved by Commissioner Vincent, seconded by Commissioner Knapp, that the public hearing be closed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Swanson;those r voting No, none. Mayor Swanson closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the Commission finally adopt Commission Resolution No; 2886, levying and assessing delinquent snow Y 9 9 removal charges for Fiscal Year 1992. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those votingAye being Commissioner Knapp,,, Commissioner Frost Commissioner Vincent and Y 9 PP. Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. i i Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 2887 - levying and assessing sidewalk assessments for 1991 sidewalk program {' This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. I 2887, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2887 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT AND TAX AGAINST EACH LOT OR PARCEL OF LAND IN FRONT OF WHICH SIDEWALKS, CURBS, GUTTERS, AND ALLEY APPROACHES`( OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED UNDER ORDER OF CITY COMMISSION DATED APRIL 15, 1991, TO DEFRAY THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SIDEWALKS, CURBS, GUTTERS AND ALLEY APPROACHES OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF. Mayor Swanson o 9pened the public hearing. City Manager �ysocki stated the construction work for the 1991 sidewalk program has �� just been completed and the construction costs finalized, in the amount of $133,879.78. He reminded the Commission that last ear, the ordered in sidewalks along specified portions of v Y � Y 9 P specified streets in the community; and private property owners were given until a date certain to install the sidewalks themselves, before the City ordered in the remainder under its program. He 10-19-92 Mayor Swanson opened the public hearing. The staff report was presented by Assistant Planner David Grigsby. He stated that under this application, Simkins-Hallin proposes to relocate its offices and retail operations from its present location at the corner of North Wallace Avenue and East Lamme Street to the subject site at the corner of North Broadway Avenue and East Fridley Street, where its truss plant and some of its storage yard are located. He noted that this includes the consolidation of all operations at one location, through the construction of a new building and facilities. Planner Grigsby stated the subject parcel is zoned M-1, Commercial--Light Manufacturing. He noted that surrounding zones includes medium-density residential to the south and west and light industrial to the north. He stated that under this application, the applicant proposes to construct a new office building fronting on North Broadway Avenue, with a large paved parking lot between it and the street. The parking lot is to be screened from the street and the residential areas by earth berms, a four-foot retaining wall and a heavily vegetated buffer strip. He noted that a sidewalk along North Broadway Avenue has been shown on the plan, although ,it has been designated as a future sidewalk rather than one to be immediately installed. He also noted that the landscaping along North Broadway Avenue does not extend far enough south to buffer all of the residences across the street from this industrial operation; and staff has recommended a condition that the landscaping be extended as far south as possible. The Assistant Planner stated that this requested planned unit development will allow the relocation of the retail store and offices from the old location to the new location, which is approximately four blocks. He noted that with the'two separate buildings, there are many company vehicles and several customers' vehicles which traverse through the residential neighborhood to view products before making a purchase. He stated that this consolidation will eliminate that travel, which will benefit the residential area. He noted that in conjunction with this application, there has been some discussion of seeking a vacation of East Fridley Street from North Broadway Avenue east to the existing truss plant; however, no formal application has been filed to date. Assistant Planner Grigsby stated that under this planned unit development, the applicant is seeking relaxation of some of the standards in the zone code, in exchange for some of the amenities provided, i.e., the heavy buffering strip along North Broadway Avenue. He stated these include a 20-foot front yard setback rather than the required 25-foot setback since this property is located immediately across the street from a residential zone. He stated that this would allow 10-19-92 - 16 - the building to be constructed with essentially the same setback as other buildings in the area and allow for a larger parking area, which would be heavily buffered. He stated the applicant is also requesting that one of the conditions for approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the truss plant be lifted. He noted that under that condition, the parking lot for employees was to be paved, with curbing and landscaping. He noted that only three to four employees use that parking lot; and the applicant is requesting that the parking lot remain graveled, with the stipulation that he will monitor it to ensure no dust problems arise; and if they do, he will utilize an acceptable dust control program. He noted that if the unpaved parking lot becomes a chronic problem, paving could then be required. He then stated the third issue on which the applicant is seeking relaxation is the requirement for interior landscaping for a parking lot where the distance exceeds 100 feet. He noted that in this instance, the parking lot is 140 feet long; however, with the heavy vegetative strip to be installed along the street, interior landscaping would be of no real benefit. Assistant Planner Grigsby stated the new building is to be a steel building with a dry-vit face and entry area. He stated the applicant proposes to either paint or re-side the other buildings on the site so that they match the new structure, which will greatly reduce the glare from the existing galvanized buildings into the residential area. The Planner stated that traffic patterns to and from the subject site have been of major concern to the applicant, residents of the area, Planning staff and the City-County Planning Board. He noted that with the current street system, most vehicles will gain access from North Broadway Avenue, East Peach Street and possibly North Wallace Avenue. He noted that all of those streets are designated as collector streets at this time, with Main Street and North Rouse Avenue being designated as arterial streets. He stated that, while this consolidation of the existing business may create additional traffic on these streets, it will greatly reduce the traffic between the two stores, which is a substantial benefit to the area and the residential streets. The Planner stated that the Parks, Open Space and Trails Committee has reviewed this application, since the issue of trails must be addressed in the planned unit development process. He stated that since a trail system is proposed along the old railroad track, the Committee feels that no additional trails are needed through this project. He then noted that one of the conditions for approval of this application is that one-half of East Fridley Street be constructed to a local street standard, including curb and gutter. He stated that if the applicant applies for, and receives approval of, an application for vacation of that street right-of-way, this condition will be voided. 10-19-92 He also noted that the applicant will be required to install a looped system for the water mains, which should increase water pressure to the area, including the residential neighborhood. The Assistant Planner stated that the City-County Planning Board reviewed this application at its regular meeting held on October 6, 1992. He stated that after reviewing all of the information submitted and the public testimony received in light of the criteria established for review of conditional use permits, the Planning Board concurred in the staff's recommendation for approval, subject to 26 conditions. Mr. Dan Kamp, architect representing the applicant, stated it is the applicant's intent to consolidate his operations into one location. He noted that with the current configuration of the operation, the traffic impacts to the residential area are quite significant. He then addressed the design of the facility in relationship to the neighborhood. He noted that the main exposure of the site, which was formerly the Gallatin Farmers propane station, is to the west and the northwest, which will be heavily landscaped to minimize the view. He noted the proposed retaining wall will severely limit any visibility of parked cars; and it will also serve to create a pedestrian barrier which will encourage people to drive into the parking lot rather than parking on the street. He noted that the landscaping will be extended as far as possible, as requested by staff. Mr. Kamp then stated he has discussed the possible vacation of East Fridley Street with the City Engineer. He noted that the Street Department has expressed concern about the proposed vacation; however, he noted that the right-of-way has already been vacated through the truss plant operation, so there is only approximately one block of right-of-way involved. He then briefly reviewed the three deviations being sought in conjunction with this application, stating that he feels they are all realistic and encouraged approval. Mr. Kamp stated he feels this project is a good example of how the system can work. He noted that the applicant and the neighbors have been willing to work together to make this a project which is acceptable to everyone. He also thanked the Planning staff for its willingness to serve as facilitator whenever necessary to ensure the success of this application. Responding to Mayor Swanson, Mr. Kamp noted that, ultimately, the transportation plan update calls for Front Street to be looped around through the flood plain and across the railroad right-of-way, to tie into Highland Boulevard. He noted that when that becomes a reality, it could alleviate much of the traffic on the other streets. He stated, however, that he does not feel that the vacation of East Fridley Street will have any impact on that, since the portion closest to that 10-19-92 i - 18 - eventual loop has already been vacated. He stated that access can be provided from the looped road system into this subject site, however, even though it is all privately owned. Further responding to the Mayor, Mr. Tom Simkins, applicant, stated he plans to retain the existing facility at the corner of North Wallace Avenue and East Lamme Street for storage of materials for large jobs whenever necessary, noting his tendency to underestimate the amount of materials and storage needed. He stated that once the building boom is past, or if he finds the additional storage is not necessary, he will try to lease or possibly sell the old site. He noted that, since the building was constructed as a lumber yard, he recognizes that substantial remodeling will be necessary for any other type of operation. Mayor Swanson noted his interest in ensuring that the old site remains well maintained, rather than becoming an abandoned building and an eyesore in the neighborhood. Commissioner Knapp noted there railroad tracks and a spur track close to the subject property. She then asked if any consideration has been given to having some of the materials delivered by rail rather than by truck. Mr. Tom Simkins responded that he has been in contact with Montana Rail Link about the possibility of deliveries via a spur line. He also noted that is one of the assets of this parcel. Commissioner Frost noted that in the proposal, it indicates that lighting will be for security purposes; however, he noted there are no specifics and there is no condition requiring that the lighting meet the zone code requirements. He then indicated his interest in ensuring that the lights do not create any glare or impact on the adjacent residential area. Assistant Planner Grigsby noted the applicant has indicated that the lights will be a maximum of 20 feet in height; and the luminaries are-to be recessed within the hood. Commissioner Frost indicated his interest in avoiding any possible misunderstandings on this issue in the future. He then noted that the southward extension of the landscaping was not mentioned in the proposal, nor was the issue of repainting or re-siding the existing structures. He asked if these are issues that should be addressed by the City. The Assistant Planner noted that a condition has been attached which requires the southward extension of the landscaping; however, the other issue has not been addressed as of this time. Mr. Tom Simkins noted that he has agreed to do the repainting or re-siding; and he will do so to ensure that he maintains his credibility with the neighborhood, whether the City attaches 10-19-92 r it as a condition or not. Further responding to Commissioner Frost, Mr. Simkins stated that, while the existing Front Street in that area is not really a public street, he intends to utilize it for his truck traffic as much as possible, to minimize impacts on the residential area. Mr. Don Bachman, 109 North Broadway Avenue, stated he generally supports this application; however, he does have a few concerns. He stated that he is not an advocate of continued industrial growth in this neighborhood, although he feels that in this instance, the consolidation of the operation will solve more problems than it will create. He noted his concurrence with some of the issues raised by the Commissioners, including the need to ensure that the existing facility does not become a blighted facility with no or very limited use. He then concurred with the suggestion that rail delivery be considered in lieu of truck delivery. He also indicated that lighting is also a concern of the neighborhood. He noted that, while security lighting is necessary, care should be taken to ensure that it is not obtrusive to the neighbors. Mr. Bachman then stated support for relief from the setback requirements, as requested, in exchange for the landscaping and berming proposed. He also stated support for the request for relief from a center landscape island, stating that the additional parking spaces are more important, to ensure that the on-street parking remains open to casual visitors in the area. Mr. Bachman then encouraged the Commission to consider a condition requiring the installation of the sidewalk along North Broadway Avenue. He noted that during review of the recent application for variances from Mr. Joe Polus for reconstruction of the warehouse building immediately to the north, the issue of sidewalks was discussed. He then suggested that this project be considered in conjunction with that warehouse project, particularly when considering the possible request for vacation of East Fridley Street. He noted it would be beneficial to consider that issue before making the decision on this application, to avoid possible future confusion; however, he recognizes that the decision on this item should be made before that process could be completed. He then suggested that access into the site via Front Street, as previously discussed, could alleviate much of the traffic along North Broadway Avenue. Mr. Don Bachman then addressed paving of the employee parking area. He noted one concern is dust, particularly with the number of vehicles which may be'moving around the yard and the east winds which tend to blow on a frequent basis. He stated that he feels the requirement for paving has a sound basis, and asked that the Commission consider this issue, including East i 10-19-92 i - 20 - Fridley Street, the employee parking area and the frequently traveled ways within the development. He then stated he has a personal problem with the use of magnesium chloride, characterizing it as a highly toxic chemical that does a good job of supressing dust, but which can be extremely toxic when it lands in a waterway. He reminded the Commission that the ditch which runs through this property has a fairly healthy flow, which runs into Rocky Creek and then into the East Gallatin River. He suggested that staff be directed to investigate this issue further, before allowing this method of dust abatement. Mr. Bachman stated that, on the whole, he feels this planned unit development will solve more problems that it will create. He noted that consolidation of the operations will greatly diminish the casual use of the residential streets by delivery trucks, fork lifts and retail customers. He then reiterated his position that, except for the concerns raised, he supports this project. Mr. Larry Hancock, 225 North Broadway Avenue, stated his support for this project. He noted that Mr. Simkins has agreed to install the additional landscaping, as discussed. He then stated he feels this application will result in lessening the impacts on the neighborhood from this operation. He then stated he does not feel that the gravel parking lots will create much of a problem, since the buildings are located between those parking lots and North Broadway Avenue. Mr. Dan Kamp stated that magnesium chloride is the form of dust control recommended by the State Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks for areas which are immediately adjacent to waterways. He further noted the applicant's willingness to change the form of dust abatement if that is no longer determined appropriate. He then stated that the configuration of the buildings on the site and the way the materials will be stored will serve as an effective wind break. Commissioner Frost stated he feels that sidewalks should be installed immediately. He then asked if Condition No. 11 addresses that issue adequately. 'Mr. Dan Kamp stated that if the sidewalk connects to other sidewalks, he feels that immediate installation would be appropriate. He noted, however, that if it is the only sidewalk in the area and goes from nowhere to nowhere, he feels it is premature. He stated his recognition that this is an issue that the Commission may dictate. Responding to Commissioner Vincent, Mr. Kamp noted that all of the windows in the offices will have a northern exposure, so that the storage yards are readily visible. Responding to Commissioner'Knapp, Mr. Simkins stated there will be no outside speakers. He noted the subject parcel contains 8.5 acres; and they have radios for everyone rather than trying 10-19-92 - 21 0 0 to reach them through a speaker system. Mr. Dan Kamp noted that the lighting detail reflects that the luminaries are fully contained within the hood. He noted that they are similar to the lights that have recently been installed at the University; and they will be located along the front of the parking lot. He then stated these lights will be less prominent than the street lights in the area. City Manager Wysocki read into the record a letter of support from Robert Lee, 2101 Fairway Drive, dated October 19; and a memo from Director of Public Service Phill Forbes, dated October 13, regarding timing of the installation of the looped water line. Assistant Planner Grigsby stated the concern raised in Director Forbes' memo is addressed in Condition No. 9. Commissioner Knapp noted that Condition No. 5 requires the applicant to sign a waiver of protest for the creation of SID's for a proposed truck route. She expressed concern that the Commission has not yet finalized the transportation plan, and questioned how realistic this requirement might be. Responding to Mayor Swanson, Mr. Simkins stated he does not believe anyone would benefit from tying into the water line which he must install to provide a.looped system. He noted, therefore, he probably will not be eligible for any payback. The Mayor requested that staff review the issue further, stating he feels it should be clearly addressed before finalization of this process, to avoid any possible confusion in the future. No one was present to speak in opposition to the requested conditional use permit. It was moved by Commissioner Knapp, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the public hearing be closed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Vincent and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. Mayor Swanson closed the public hearing. A decision will be forthcoming at next week's meeting. Commissioner Vincent stated his appreciation for the work which Mr. Simkins and the neighborhood have done on this application. He noted the benefits derived from such cooperation, and the difference between this type of procedure and one which includes confrontation. 10-19-92 - 22 - 4 Break - 8:25 to 8:30 p.m. Mayor Swanson declared a break from 8:25 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., in accordance with Commission policy established at their regular meeting of March 14, 1983. Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 2878 - intent to annex 13.0-acre tract known as Parcel A and Parcel B located in the W% W YZ NE% SW'/4 and the E%, EY., NW Y4, SW, %, Section 11, T2S R5E MPM (Schrenk annexation request lying north of Main Mall and south of'West Babcock Street This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. i 2878, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2878 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE�CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN/ AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOLADARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. Mayor Swanson opened the public hearing. The staff report was presented by Senior/Pl/anner Dave Skelton. He noted that the Commission has received two letters of opposition to this requested annexation, one from Mr. r Drive dated October 1 and one from Esther Reiter, 3006 West Richard Nellen, 16 North Western , Babcock Street, dated October 14. The Planner reminded the Commission that they had received a comprehensive staff report on this annexation at their August 17 meeting, and briefly highlighted some of the important points of that report. He noted the subject 13.0--acre parcel is located immediately north of the Main Mall and south of West Babcock Street; antl� Y parcels lie between it and the city limits on either side. He noted that the staff report reflects the staff's responses to the eight goals and twelve policies established by the Commission under Commission Resolution No. 2716. He noted the City's desire to infill the gaps which exist within the city limits. He stated that, while this annexation request 9 P � � .Y does not fully infill a gap, it does substantially reduce one. Planner Skelton no/ted that the City q has adequate water and sewer services to accommodate development of the subject parcel. He noted, however, that the transportation infrastructure is a proble4,/particularly in light of the fact that West Babcock Street is currently a below acceptable roadway. He noted that signalization of the intersection of West Main Street and 10-19-92 MEMO ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION FROM: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 15 , 1992 RE: SIMKINS-HALLIN P.U. D. i ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please find the attached Bozeman City-County Planning Board Resolution #Z-92117 , Planning Board minutes from October 6 , 1992 , and the applicant ' s plans and submittal documents for the Simkins- Hallin P.U.D. It has come to the attention of the Planning Staff that the designations of existing streets , identified in the applicant' s traffic study as the most highly travelled routes to and from the site (under the third paragraph of item "B. " , of the Conditional Use Criteria, on page 4 of the Bozeman City-County Staff Report ) , is in need of further clarification. In reference to the above mentioned paragraph on page four, the main routes of traffic onto Broadway were listed as "from the south, from the intersections of Broadway with East Main and Mendenhall streets , and from the north via Avocado and it ' s connection to the west with Peach Street and Rouse . " The next sentence in the paragraph identified "All of the above streets are also arterial streets . . . " and should be corrected and clarified as follows : "East Main and North Rouse are designated as arterial streets . North Broadway, Avocado, and Peach are designated as collector streets . Mendenhall from Rouse to North Broadway is designated as a local street. All of the above streets and traffic routes together, are capable of supporting any new increase in traffic that may occur as a result of this proposal . " I I hope this clarifies the issue of the traffic routes and street designations. If you have any further questions regarding this item or the Simkins-Hallin P.U.D. , please contact me at the Planning Office . October 13, 1992 TO: James E. Wysocki, City Manager FROM: Phillip J. Forbes, Director of Public Serviceo:�- RE: Simkins P.U.D. During DRC review of the referenced project, a requirement imposed that the waterline loop in the property be completed prior to issuance of a building permit. l understand the primary reason for said requirement is that this will be the last permit issued for the site. Without reflecting on the applicant, it was felt that satisfactory completion of the waterline would only be assured with the leverage of the permit. Otherwise, adequate fire protection is currently provided by hydrants) on Broadway. Since the DRC meeting l have discussed the project with Tom Simkins. l believe he will propose posting some form of acceptable security in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of the waterline, hoping to get started earlier on his building construction. l do not want to undermine the DRC, but l do not object to the posting of security. It seems to be consistent with other projects and subdivisions requiring improvements. cc: File Company expansion tops planning board agenda. The Bozeman City-County Planning Board will meet Tuesday at 7 p.m. in the basement of City Hall for a public hearing on a proposal by Simkins- Hallin to build an 11,800-square-foot retail building on 8.5 acres in the 300 block of North Broadway. The building will allow the lumber company to consolidate its opera- tions in one site. Also on the agenda is a hearing to change the zoning on a tract across West Main Street from the Main Mall.The land is proposed to be changed from agriculture-suburban zoning to that of B-2 for community` la �business.,r fr f ITEM 4. NEW BUSINESS A . PUBLIC HEARING - #Z-92117 - SIMKINS-HALLIN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RETAIL BUILDING, AND TO RELOCATE THE OFFICES AND RETAIL PORTION OF THEIR BUSINESS THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED ON NORTH WALLACE , TO THE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING AND SITE , LOCATED ON THE 300 BLOCK OF NORTH BROADWAY, IN AN "M-1" ( LIGHT-MANUFACTURING) DISTRICT Planner Grigsby presented an abbreviated Staff Report, stating that the Development Review Committee, the Design Review Board, and the Planning Staff , have determined that the proposal is in compliance with the PUD review criteria set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. In response to President Wiseman, Planner Grigsby stated that the impacts from the present business operation will be minimized once the two sights are consolidated. He stated that the present facility on Wallace Street is overbuilt , does not provide off- street parking to employees or customers, and there is a considerable amount of congestion in crossing the intersection of Wallace and Lamme Streets. Lisa Prugh stated that the proposal may be an improvement to congestion of traffic on Wallace and Lamme but questioned what the impact would be to the neighborhoods on North Broadway and Peach. She further stated that Broadway and Peach are collector streets, and not arterials as stated in the Staff Report. Lisa Pruah referred to the October 1 , 1992 memo from Phill Forbes, Director of Public Service, in which he refers to the construction of the Front Street connection to Main Street, and advocated the onset of that proposal . Director Epple stated that the location in which the new retail store is proposed to be constructed is currently the lumberyard for Simkins-Hallin, and there is already considerable traffic between the two facilities. He stated that , by consolidating all of the operations, he believes there will be a decrease in traffic counts as traffic will be concentrated at one location rather than going back and forth between two locations . Lisa Prugh stated that she agrees with that but to suggest that relief of traffic to Wallace and Mendenhall Streets is a great improvement, when it is placing a bigger problem on Broadway and Peach which already have a tremendous amount of truck traffic, is not quite factual . Jane Newhall stated that she has been concerned with the water pressure in that area due to the serious fire that has occurred there. Planner Grigsby stated that the proposed water main and hydrants that the applicant has been requested to provide will be Planning Board — October 6, 1992 2 a benefit to the surrounding area as looping the water main system will increase water pressure to the hydrants. In response to Kris Dunn, Planner Grigsby stated that he discussed the trail system with Planner Kevin Wall , who worked closely with the Parks, Open Space, and Trails Committee (POST ) . He was told that the POST Committee feels it is more desirable to bring the trail onto the opposite side of the railroad tracks and cross through the area to the east. Dan Kamp, the applicant's representative, stated he would like to highlight some of the key issues regarding this proposal as follows: 1 ) it is a combination of two operations into one singular site which will decrease the amount of traffic which goes back and forth between the storage yard and the retail store, 2) visual impacts to adjacent residences will be resolved through extensive landscaping and a retaining wall which will discourage parking along Broadway . Additional parking spaces have been provided on-site to discourage parking on the street ; 3) the new fire hydrants will make it easier to service this property and the residences across the street; and 4) the vacation of Fridley. Dan Kamp stated that the City Engineer would prefer to see Fridley Street vacated, however, the Street Department has concerns of a potential future connection there. He stated that the main points being raised in this issue is the level of improvement to that portion of the street. Dan Kamp stated that they are requesting a 5 foot deviation from the 25 foot frontyard setback, adding that they feel they have offset that by putting in a retaining wall , berming, and additional landscaping. Mr . Kamp stated that the applicant is also offering to include a dust control program on the site and has agreed to pave the additional parking lot if the dust control program is not effective . He stated that the storage of materials on the site tends to break up the wind action and dust control does not appear to be a problem. Dan Kamp stated that the applicant has asked that the requirement to include a landscape island on the west side of -the parking lot be waived in order to provide additional off-street parking spaces. Responding to Jim Devitt, Dan Kamp stated that it would not be of great benefit to pave the employee parking area as it would have gravel roads accessing it, and also because there would be only two to three employees that would be using it . He further stated that the applicant is willing to pave it in the future if its use increases and a dust problem arises. Responding to President Wiseman, Tom Simkins stated that he would estimate that 45-50% of their customers go to both business locations. Planning Board - October 6, 1992 3 There being no further questions -from the Board, President Wiseman OPENED THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING . 'i Larry Hancock, 225 N . Broadway, stated that most of the neighbors on Broadway have no major objections to the relocation of the' Simkins-Hallin retail store. He stated that there were concerns that the galvanized steel building would have considerable reflection coming off of it and there was also concern that parking would create problems, however , it appears that Mr . Simkins is attempting to solve those problems. He stated that some people questioned if Broadway would be used to unload trucks as is done now. Larry Hancock stated that a few people were concerned that there would be forklift noises, however, he feels that will be solved if the two business locations are consolidated. Responding to President Wiseman, Larry Hancock stated that the forklift traffic is presently quite intense. Leslie Lohbeck, 317 N . Broadway, stated that she lives almost directly across from the access to the parking lot off of North Broadway . She stated that she is in support of this proposal and believes it will be visually more attractive to the area, however, she is concerned that her driveway may become blocked with customer parking . Ms . Lohbeck stated that she supports the request to go 5 , into the front yard setback, adding that the extra parking with a berm around it will benefit the residents and it is a good design. She also stated that there has not been dust problems in the area so far and she would not expect it to occur since traffic is anticipated to decrease. She stated that Tom Simkins is a businessman who stays in direct communication with the residents and addresses any complaints he might receive. Leslie Lohbeck stated that she would like the Front Street arterial loop issue to be addressed, adding that the north end of town is a unique area which she would like to be a residential area. She further stated that the traffic issue in this area needs to be dealt with in relation to the entire northeast side of town . Ursula Neese, 513 North Plum, stated that it is impossible for two vehicles to pass on Avocado Street at the same time and it is a hazardous situation. Ursula further stated concern with forklift traffic from Avocado to Broadway. Tom Simkins stated that forklift traffic will be limited as most of the work will be done at the back portion of the new location. He stated that arrangements may be made to use Front Street for forklift traffic when needed. Ursula Neese stated that would be helpful . In conclusions, Ms. Neese state that there needs to be an emphasis on developing the Highland/Front/Oak Street connection. Guy Ouellette; 611 East Lamme, stated that he is in support 'of the proposal , adding that currently there are trucks outside his door all day long. He stated that the proposed parking lot will also be beneficial and improve the on-street parking situation. Planning Board - October 6, 1992 4 Bill Norton, 230 N . Plum, stated that he lives between the current and proposed store location and, speaking for other people who live in that area, they are in support of the proposal in order to cut down the back and forth traffic . He further stated that he believes Tom Simkin' s estimate that 40-50% of their customers go back and forth between the two locations is low. Steve Warren, 622 East Lamme, stated his gratitude to Tom Simkins for doing a good job with traffic and keeping people out of his yard. He also stated concern as to what will happen to the location that is being abandoned. He stated that he hopes there will be no more forklifts in the area . Mr. Warren stated that he is in favor of the additional parking spaces and supports the proposal . There being no one else present wishing to speak on behalf of or in opposition to Application #Z-92117, President Wiseman CLOSED i THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. I Jane Newhall thanked Tom Simkins for being well prepared and for the good efforts in communication he demonstrated with the nearby residences. Responding to Jim Devitt, Planner Grigsby stated that there is no clear picture as to whether or not the vacation of Fridley Street will take place . Director Epple stated that the Cit,y's Street and Enaineering Departments will have to come to an agreement on this issue, which will be resolved separate from this PUD application. i Lisa Prugh stated that to suggest Fridley Street needs to be redesigned for curb and gutter seems absurd when there are so many other streets in Bozeman that need improvements . She also stated. that she hopes that when the Transportation Plan Update becomes adopted, the City will work together with the residents to look at the future for the northeast side neighborhood. President Wiseman stated that he is impressed with the communication that the applicant has carried with the residences. He also stated that he is in support of granting the deviation to encroach 5 feet into the front yard setback. Kris Dunn concurred with President Wiseman, adding that it is impressive to see people working together and it is very commendable. Dan Kamp stated that Dave Grigsby and Andy Epple also deserve credit for their efforts in addressing the neighborhood concerns. Director Epple clarified that the recommendation of Condition #15 to design Fridley Street to a local street standards does not mean it has to be constructed right away, but just designed in such a way that it can be constructed to local street standards if paving becomes necessary in the future . Planning Board 7 October 6, 1992 5 . .......... ,...i:.. .......... ......... ....... i..a..s... .....1... .....•u.u.itwF:k.Va:.l.:a4...iw:.i_�..u...uy.ew......o:L'...e_v..a....... u.....n.....:ai.Y3�.nriuv.S.....-.I.-.w.e:eu^a...t.t..an.n.......i.ee.u... Planner Grigsby stated that Tom Simkins has discussed the possibility of painting the galvanized steel buildings to reduce reflection. He also stated that the applicant seems to be amenable to the condition requiring the landscaping to be brought down into the R-3 areas . MOTION - It was moved by Bob Bullock , seconded by Noreen Alldredge, to recommend approval of Application #Z-92117 with the 26 conditions listed in the Staff Report and with the amended version of condition #9 . The motion carried, 9-0, with those voting Yes being Bill Wright, Clark Babcock , Lisa Prugh, Jane Newhall , Kelly Wiseman, Kris Dunn, Jim Devitt, Noreen Alldredge. and Bob Bullock . This application will be heard before the City Commission on Monday, October 19, 1992 . B . PUBL.IC HEARING FOR PLANNING APPLICATION #P-9226 FOR A MASTER PLAN MAP AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE 1990 BOZEMAN AREA MASTER PLAN FROM A "BUSINESS PARK/INDUSTRIAL" LAND USE DESIGNATION TO A "COMMERCIAL." DESIGNATION , AND ZONING APPLICATION #Z-921.0q TO AMEND THE CITY OF BOZEMAN AND BOZEMAN AREA ZONING MAPS FROM "PLI- PUBLIC LANDS AND INSTITUTION" AND "A-S - AGRICULTURE-SUBURBAN" ZONING DESIGNATIONS TO A "B-2 COMMUNITY BUSINESS" ZONING . DESIGNATION SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE MAIN MALL AND SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST MATN STREET AND COLLEGE. STREET . Planner Arkell gave a combined presentation of . the Staff Reports for the zoning and planning applications ( on file in the City-County Planning Office ) . She also noted that there is an Annexation Application of 1.2 acres that is currently under consideration by the City Commission . Following a summary of the proposal . Planner Arkell stated that; the Planning Staff supports the application to amend the Land Use Element of the Master Plan subject to completion of the annexation process and to amend the City of Bozeman and Bozeman Area Zoning Maps subject to completion of the annexation process and approval of the requested Master Plan amendment. . Jane Newhall stated that if these application, are approved , - it will hurry development of this property and she believes everything should be done to slow down its. development until the College and Main Street corner is improved . She stated that she and her husband once owned the property that is now the Main Mall and the Woolen Shop and at treat time the access from College Street onto Main St.re;et, was:: unsatisfactory with many accidents occurring there. She stated that they gave five more acrec. to the State Highway Department to improve that; corner but little has been dune Planning Board - October 6, 1992 6 I t ,s RESOLUTION #Z-92117 RESOLUTION OF THE BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF APPLICATION #Z-92117 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT o DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RETAIL BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND TO RELOCATE THE OFFICES AND RETAIL PORTION OF THEIR BUSINESS THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED ON NORTH WALLACE, TO THE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING AND SITE ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 18 , BLOCK 46 AND LOTS 16 THROUGH 27 , BOTH INCLUSIVE, z IN BLOCK 49, LOTS 1 THROUGH 8 , INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 46, x LOTS 9 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 46 OF THE NORTHERN k PACIFIC ADDITION TO BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, M AND AN IRREGULAR SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 3 . 98 ACRES IN THE NORTHERN PACIFIC ADDITION TO BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE 300 BLOCK OF NORTH BROADWAY, ' BOZEMAN, F MONTANA ----------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman and the Gallatin County ' Commissioners have adopted a Master Plan pursuant to 76-1-604 , M.C.A. , 1981 ; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board has been created by joint resolution of the City of Bozeman and Gallatin County as provided for in Title 76-2-307 , M.C.A. , 1981 , and a jurisdictional area created under 76-2-310, M.C.A. 1981 ; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board has been designated by the City Commission' to serve as the Bozeman Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the proposed Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development application has been properly submitted, reviewed, and advertised in accordance with the procedures of Section 18. 53 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board held a public hearing on October 6 , 1992 , to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board finds that the application complies with each of the approval criteria established in Chapter 18. 53 . 030 and Section 18. 54 . 100.E. of the Bozeman Area Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bozeman City-County Planning Board voted, 9-0 , to recommend to the Bozeman City Commission that Conditional Use Permit Application #Z-92117 for a 1 r Planned Unit Development to allow the applicant to construct a new retail building with associated parking, and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business that is currently located on North Wallace, to the proposed new building and site on property described as Lot 18, Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive, in Block 49, Lots 1 through 8, inclusive, in Block 46, Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive, in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition toBozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3 . 98 acres in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 block of North Broadway, Bozeman, Montana, be conditionally approved with the following attached conditions: 1 . That the applicant submit a revised site plan to the Planning Office identifying the following landscape related items, prior to Final Site Plan approval : A. All of the interior landscape islands shall be landscaped with the plantings as shown, and shall be seeded in grass or sod and noted on the FSP; B. All landscaped areas shall be provided a hose bib or adequate underground irrigation system located within each landscaped area, and identified on the FSP; C. Landscaping, including Boulevard trees (where applicable) , grass, screening, and buffering requirements shall be installed the entire length of the property bordering North Broadway (excluding drive accesses ) , and along the subject property bordering the residences to the South, and shall be located and identified on the FSP; D. The total of each landscaped area shall contain not less than 75% live vegetation and ground cover. E. Unless Fridley street is vacated, there shall be one more large canopy tree bordering Fridley street and shown on the FSP; 2 . That the applicant submit a revised site plan identifying all dropped curbs, continuous curbing , wheel stops, handicapped accessible ramps, 4" wide painted striping, for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval . 3 . All interior sidewalks shall be raised above parking lot surface the height of a standard continuous curb, and noted on the FSP; 2 4. "No Parking" signs shall be installed along the length of the drive isle bordering the sidewalk at the front of the new retail store; 5 . The applicant shall file waivers of protest to the creation of an S. I .D. for the proposed "Front Street" ` Arterial/Peripheral truck route,' and for the creation of an S. I .D. for the signalization of the intersection of Peach and Rouse ; t 6. The Stormwater Drainage/Treatment Plan basin sizing and discharge calculations, discharge destination, and a stormwater maintenance plan must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. ; 7. Plans and Specifications for the water main extensions prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health grkd Environmental Sciences. The applicant shall r also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. ) 8. Plans` and Specifications for any proposed water main and hydrants, or fire service line must be prepared by a , Professional Engineer (PE) , and be provided to and approved by both the State W.Q.B. and the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the water main and hydrants, or fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for the Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. 9. That the proposed water main and hydrants as shown on the plans and submitted to the State W.Q.B. and the City Engineer, be installed and in service prior to occupancy of the new building , and that no occupancy permits shall be granted. nor any Financial guarantees accepted prior to said installation and completion of the service. 10. Sewer and water (domestic and/or fire) services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman Applications for service shall be completed by the applicant. 11 . The sidewalks and parking lot approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach ( i .e. concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval . 3 12 . Asphalt or Concrete headers shall be provided around the perimeter of all new asphalt not contained by a concrete curb. 13 . The configuration of the off-street parking area shall comply with the requirements of 18. 50. 120 of the Zone Code unless a deviation or variance is .granted by the .governing body. In particular the narrow drive aisles between the buildings, and the NE access must meet code requirements for width. 14 . The . extent of the previous Fridley Street vacation must be delineated. 15 . Fridley Street shall be designed for paving to a City of Bozeman local street standard, including curb/gutter and sidewalk, and shall be completed to a minimum width of 24 feet by the applicant in such a manner as to lend to future completion to the City Standard. Paving shall be completed to the eastern-most parking lot access. If Fridley is vacated the DRC recommends the adjoining property owners enter into an agreement for a shared access at the existing R/W centerline. 16. All existing and proposed utility and other easements must be shown on the Final Site Plan. City standard form water line easements shall be filed by the property owner prior to FSP approval . 17 . Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the access sight triangles, but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder) . 18. That in the event the dust control/abatement program fails, and dust from the lot becomes a problem, that the applicant be required to pave the truss plant employee parking lot as originally conditioned in the approval of the truss plant C.U.P. CUP Conditions required by Section 18 . 53 .030.G 19. The right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 20 . That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land .use and shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns. 4 21 . That all conditions specifically stated under any Conditional Use listed in this Ordinance shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns. 22. That all of the special conditions shall be consented to, in writing by the applicant. Boiler Plate Conditions 2,3 . Seven copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the u conditions , corrections , and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approved by the Planning Director within six months of the date of City Commission approval . Signed copies shall be retained by the City departments represented on the Development Review Committee, 'and one signed copy shall be retained by the applicant. 24 . The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal . Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement. 25 . The first Building permit must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan Approval . Building Permits will not be issued until.•• the Final Site Plan is approved. No site work, including excavation, may occur until a Building permit is issued. A separate Building permit must be obtained for signage, prior to installation of any signage. 26. If occupancy of the structure or commencement of the use is to occur prior to the installation of all improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve ( 12 ) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine ( 9 ) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. I DATED THIS 6th day of October, 1992 . Resolution No. Z-92117 Andrew C. Epple , Di a or Kelly Wiseman, President City-County Planning Office City-County Planning Board 5 I ITEMBOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD STAFF REPORT ------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ITEM: "SIMKINS-HALLIN" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #Z-92117 FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RETAIL BUILDING, AND TO RELOCATE THE OFFICES AND RETAIL PORTION OF THEIR BUSINESS THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED ON NORTH WALLACE, TO THE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING AND SITE, .THEREBY CONSOLIDATING ALL OF THEIR OPERATIONS INTO A SINGLE 8 . 5 ACRE SITE, LOCATED ON THE 300 BLOCK OF NORTH BROADWAY, IN AN "M-1" (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) DISTRICT APPLICANT: WESTLAND CORPORATION, 124 NORTH WALLACE AVENUE, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 DATE/TIME: CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD: TUESDAY, 6 OCTOBER 1992 AT 7 : 00 P.M. IN THE MEETING ROOM OF THE BOZEMAN CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN, BOZEMAN, MONTANA CITY COMMISSION: MONDAY, 19 OCTOBER 1992 AT 7 : 00 P.M. IN THE MEETING ROOM OF CITY HALL REPORT BY: CITY-COUNTY PLANNING STAFF (GRIGSBY) ------------------------------------------------------------------- Location/Description: The subject property is described as Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive, in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive , in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3 . 98 acres in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. Said property is zoned "M-1" (Light Manufacturing) District, and is approximately 8 . 5 acres. Please refer to the map below. 9 = LD ra 00 Y ?cgsDLQ . o ' r Ones {''•' pAV t SUBJECT o PROPERTY Q a �k m �, - e� a � r �:._ �, .� r � 3 t r .) 1 1 .. .. i t t • • I Proposal : This application is for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to allow the applicant to construct a new retail building , and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business that is currently located on North Wallace, to the proposed new building and site , thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site. The proposed new retail building will have an 11 , 800 square foot main floor sales and office area, and 1920 square feet of upper floor office space . The new wood framed structure would be sided and roofed in colored standing seam metal , and would include a synthetic stuccoed gable end and overhang emphasizing the main entry area. The front of the building and the main entry would face the paved front parking lot and North Broadway. An "L" shaped paved parking lot with drive isles , and a total of thirty-three off-street parking spaces , is proposed for the new facility, and includes one vehicular access onto North Broadway and a second vehicular access onto the adjacent Fridley Street. The new building and parking area would be buffered from the adjacent R-3A (Residential-Two-Family Medium Density) District through the use of earth berming against a four foot high retaining wall ( facing the parking lot) , and landscaped vegetative screening in the required front yard area bordering North Broadway. A dust control program will be implemented to monitor the dust levels emanating from all unpaved areas of the site , whether they be created by wind or vehicular traffic , and to monitor those conditions on a quarterly basis . As the dust begins to increase, the applicant will implement an application of a coating that will cause the dust to not become airborne . This will occur by the application of a solution approved for use by the EPA such as magnesium 'fluoride, and will be applied as necessary" . The applicant has proposed to pave a portion of Fridley Street from North Broadway east to the new parking lot access exiting onto Fridley Street . The applicant is also exploring the possibility of having the City of Bozeman vacate Fridley Street east of North Broadway, although no definite plans to this effect have been finalized as of the time of this writing . The plan has proposed relaxations of the following Zoning provisions through the PUD process : A. Section 18 . 34 . 050 YARDS (M-1 District, page 57 ) - proposal requests a five foot encroachment by the front parking area into the twenty-five foot front yard setback required by Code for M-1 lots adjacent to , or across the street from an R-3A zone. 2 i B. Section 18 . 50 . 100 .D. 5c. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING ( 5b) page 133 ) - proposed front parking area has unbroken row of parking that is 145 feet long, which is 45 feet longer than the maximum of 100 feet of unbroken rows of parking allowed by Code . C. The applicant is also requesting that a Condition of Ap proval of an earlier Minor Site Plan review ( #Z-9062 ) , requiring the paving and concrete curbing of a truss manufacturing facility employee parking lot, located on the subject property and a part of the Simkins-Hallin operations , be waived. The employee parking lot would then be monitored and included as an area in the dust control program. AdJacent Land Uses : The uses adjacent to the site include the residential areas (R-3A zone) to the south and to the west across North Broadway, and light manufacturing, and warehousing areas (M-1 zone ) to the north and north-west. The property is bordered to the east by the Northern Pacific railroad right-of-way, and to the east of the right-of-way by a large tract of undeveloped M-1 zoned land. Staff Findings for CUP/PUD: The proposed Planned Unit Development has been evaluated against the ' criteria set forth in Section 18 . 53 . 030 CITY COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AND FINDINGS ( Conditional Use Procedure chapter) and Section 18 . 54 . 100.E DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA EVALUATION FORMS (Planned Unit Development chapter) of the Zoning Ordinance. After consideration by the Development Review Committee , Design Review Board, and Planning Staff, the following comments are offered: Conditional Use Permit Criteria: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. The subject site has approximately 8 . 5 acres of flat to gently sloped topography, with ample space to accommodate the existing and proposed new facilities . The applicant currently has several warehouse structures and a truss manufacturing plant, as well as outside storage areas, located throughout the property. A flood plain exists at the rear (east) portion of the site , bordering the railroad tracks . All of the applicant ' s existing buildings, storage yards , and the proposed new structure and associated parking area, are located on the flat area above and to the west of the flood plain level . 3 I I I I l 1 The applicant has requested that the proposed new parking lot be allowed to encroach five feet into the twenty-five foot front yard required by Code . This requirement was designed to minimize the negative impacts of an industrial (M-1 ) zone that is adjacent to a different zone ( in this case the residential , R-3A zone) , by requiring the more restrictive yard setbacks of the neighboring zone. While one could argue that the size of the building could be reduced to adjust the space requirements necessary to meet the required setback, it is the opinion of Staff that the applicant has offered heavy buffering , including the earth berming and four foot high retaining wall , and that the adjacent residential area will be more than adequately buffered and protected from any negative impacts of the proposed new building and parking . The DRC and the DRB were also of the opinion that the reduced setback as requested was supportable in this instance , however it was pointed out that the remainder of the site facing North Broadway and the residential areas to the west and the adjacent residential areas to the south, should also be required to be landscaped and likewise buffered. B. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. The proposed plans call for the installation of two new drive accesses that will access the new retail store and associated parking area. One of the new drive accesses would be located on North Broadway opposite the south-west end of the new structure and enter the front parking area. The second new access would enter the proposed parking area from the north- west corner and off of Fridley Street. That portion of the Fridley Street right-of-way located to the east of North Broadway is unimproved at this time and the applicant has proposed as a part of this PUD, to pave a portion of the Street from North Broadway east to the proposed new parking lot entrance. The DRC has recommended that Fridley Street be designed for paving to a City of Bozeman local street standard, including curb/gutter and sidewalk, to a minimum of 24 feet to lend to future completion to a City Standard. The applicant ' s traffic study has identified that the most highly travelled routes to the site will be from the north and the south along North Broadway. This street has been designed and designated as a collector street and is capable of handling the increase in traffic . The main routes of traffic onto Broadway will be from the south, from the intersections of Broadway with East Main and Mendenhall streets , and from the North via Avocado and it' s connection to the west with Peach Street and Rouse . All of the above streets are also 4 designated arterial streets , and capable of supporting any new increase in traffic that may occur as a result of this proposal . 11 The applicant ' s traffic study estimates an average total of 375 trips per day to the new retail store . This figure includes the 50 trips per day to the site , currently being made by customers picking up materials stored at the site. The study concludes that there will be no significant change in the level of service of the connecting arterial intersections, but that traffic on Wallace , Mendenhall and East Lamme will be decreased, especially in the area of the existing store on Wallace , due to the relocation of the retail store . In addition, the 1991 Bozeman Urban Transportation Plan Update, identifies a potential future truck route loop, that utilizes a future extension of Front Street directly to the North of the proposed site , that if and when completed would further reduce traffic on the arterials mentioned above . The DRC has asked that the applicant be willing to participate in any future SID related to the ; Front Street extension and improvements. C. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect upon the abutting property. The subject property with the exception of the residences to the south and west , is largely surrounded by Industrial uses that will not be adversely affected by this proposal. The applicant however does recognize the potential for negative impacts on the neighboring residences and is attempting to mitigate those impacts through the use of landscaping , and berming techniques , that will help to reduce noise and visual clutter, and has plans of replacing or possibly painting the existing galvanized steel building facades in a color that will reduce and minimize any visual glare . By moving the retail store to the proposed site , there will also be the elimination of most service vehicles, such as forklifts, transferring lumber products and supplies down North Broadway and up Lamme to the existing retail store on Wallace. This will be quieter as well as safer for the residents in the area. D. That the proposed use shall be in conformance with the Bozeman Area Master Plan. The Master Plan designated the subject area as "Business Park/Industrial" . The document describes this land use 5 designation as the following: . . . areas denotes employment, wholesaling and utility centers for the community; the particular type of use will be determined based upon its potential impact upon adjacent land uses and the intensity of development; in particular, the development of business park/industrial areas shall be such that the least intense uses shall be located along arterial streets , where visibility to the public is likely; more intense uses shall be located away from the arterial streets , buffered by other uses . " The existing lumber/building materials supply and warehousing operations are consistent with the intent of the Master Plan. The proposed new ' retail store will increase traffic to the site , but generally most sales and activity will take place within the new store or within the interior of the property and its associated warehousing and storage areas . This does meet the intent of the Master Plan, restricting the more intense uses , such as the companies existing truss manufacturing facility, to the interior and back portions of the lot. The buffering of the site from North Broadway and j the adjacent residential areas is also an attempt to help j lessen any impact from any intense uses within the property. i E. That the Conditional Use has complied with all conditions stipulated in Section 18. 50 of this Ordinance. The proposed Conditional Use has met or will be required to meet through Conditional Approval , all of the conditions stipulated in section 18 . 50 of the Ordinance . F. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. Such conditions may include but are not limited to: 1 . Regulation of use 2. Special yards, spaces, and buffers 3. Special fences, solid fences and walls 4. Surfacing of parking areas 5 . Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds 6. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress 7 . Regulation of signs 8. Requiring maintenance of the grounds 9. Regulation of noise, vibrations, odors 10. Regulation of hours for certain activities 11 . Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed 12 . Duration of use 13 . Requiring the dedication of access rights 6 I I i .+e i 'I i 0 14 . Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner A full list of recommended conditions is provided at the conclusion of the CUP/PUD portion of this report. Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria: Pages 221 through 228 of the Zoning Ordinance outline objectives and criteria that proposed Planned Unit Developments must fulfill . The pertinent criteria in this instance , found on the "All Development" and "Industrial" checklists , have been reviewed by the Development Review Committee, Design Review Board, and Planning Staff which have found that the proposal was in general compliance with these criteria. An overview of the findings is provided below. All Development - Neighborhood Compatibility (pg . 221 ) : In general , the proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, as defined through the required criteria. The applicant is making a serious attempt to minimize and mitigate any existing or future negative impacts that might arise as a result of any increase in activity or traffic related to the development. The proposal is for a property that is already being used for a large portion of the applicant ' s business , and this proposal will consolidate, buffer, and otherwise "clean-up" the operations, thereby reducing the over-all impact of the current business on the neighborhood and community. The proposed new retail building has been planned as an industrial type building , but attempts to relate to the more human scale of the adjacent residential neighborhood, by incorporating color and the use of a stuccoed, gabled entry area, and landscape buffering . The DRC and DRB were in agreement that the applicant should buffer all of the site adjacent to, and from residential areas, and have recommended a Condition of Approval to the effect. There is also a Condition of Approval that will require paving of the truss plant employee parking area, should the applicant' s dust control program fail to be adequate . It was not believed that the increased traffic to the site will have a significant adverse impact on the neighborhood, as the proposed routes to the site are already designed and in use as arterial streets. Public facilities , Services , and Transportation: Adequate public facilities and services are available to the site for the proposed use , and the applicant ' s have proposed to loop the water main through the site , to provide for two more on-site fire hydrants and better water pressure in the main, as requested by the DRC during the concept review. 7 : i• r� , .r�.., _ ;� t , � � � � _ _ i F ti � _ r ac I � � � ' i � t � ! l f � i 1 � � . .f , , ., � � � � . . �. . , � _ � . � 1 ' ' .1 �. . � � � � . ` .. � ' S f ,. ;{.� ' �. � - ., � � t � i . � �f � ' � i - n � � t - :4 1 • . � I _� The DRC also suggested through the concept review, that the applicant investigate the possibility of the City of Bozeman vacating Fridley Street, thereby reducing requirements for City street standards along said street . The applicant is looking into this possibility but no decisions have been made in that area as of the time of this writing. i Natural Resources: A portion of the site, to the rear of the property has been identified as an existing flood plain. None of the existing or proposed buildings , or storage areas are located in this flood plain area, and no modifications of the existing flood plain are planned. There is no permanent bodies of water in this flood plain area located on the site and no known wildlife habitat exists there . Other than the flood plain there are no other natural resources identified with this property. Environmental Standards: The proposal has been found to comply with the criteria listed for environmental standards. As stated before the applicant has proposed a dust control program for unpaved portions of the facility that have the potential for causing dust pollution, and that will prevent the spread of airborne dust through the use of an environmentally safe chemical spray.' Site Design• The proposed development has been planned and arranged in a design scheme which best meets both the needs and requirements of the Simkin- Hallin business and in its relative position within the neighborhood. The design integrates both the perceived uses of the facility in the organized progression from entering, purchase and loading of materials, through exiting the property and neighborhood. No plans have been made at this time to include provisions for a trail in the flood plain area to the rear of the property, although the applicant has indicated he is not adverse to the idea and would be willing to cooperate with any future decisions for trails in this area. The site design as a whole fulfills the objectives and criteria of this section. Industrial - Required Criteria (page 228 ) : The plan as proposed is in general compliance with the "Industrial" objectives and criteria. The project is being developed on property that is for the most part surrounded by developed areas and has existing services and utilities already available . All necessary precautions have or will be taken to prevent hazardous materials or substances from leaking into the groundwater system, 8 • i �. ,- � r � �. � - , - � . , ,� �E . . . t .. - ' ' � • ,. r ��t . _ _.:� � _ _ � � � - � F t _ �' � .. • � � l .. ._ � � ) i - i � l. � .. 'i 1 � � J _' � � � � .. l ., ., • � � it I j the site is located near an arterial street system, and landscaping and sidewalks will help tie this facility with the neighboring industrial uses to the north which are also upgrading their properties . j Conclusion , - Having reviewed this proposal for a Planned Unit Development, the Development Review Committee (DRC) , the Design Review Board (DRB) and the Planning Staff , have determined that the proposal is in compliance with the criteria set forth in Section 18 . 53 . 030 CITY COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AND FINDINGS (Conditional Use Procedure ) and Section 18 . 54 . 100 .E DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA EVALUATION j FORMS (Planned Unit Development) . The DRC, the DRB, and the Planning Staff support the proposal and recommend approval of this j application with the following conditions : I Development Review Committee j 1 . That the applicant submit a revised site plan to the Planning Office identifying the following landscape related items , prior to Final Site Plan approval : I A. All of the interior landscape islands shall be landscaped with the plantings as shown, and shall be seeded in grass or sod and noted on the FSP; I B. All landscaped areas shall be provided a hose bib or adequate underground irrigation system located within each landscaped area, and identified on the FSP; j C. Landscaping, p ' g, including Boulevard trees (where applicable) , grass , screening , and buffering requirements shall be installed the entire length of the property bordering North Broadway (excluding drive accesses ) , and along the subject property bordering the residences to the South, and shall be located and identified on the FSP; D. The total of each landscaped area shall contain not less than 75% live vegetation and ground cover. E. Unless Fridley street is vacated, there shall be one more large canopy tree bordering Fridley street and shown on the FSP; 2 . That the applicant submit a revised site plan identifying all dropped curbs , continuous curbing , wheel stops , handicapped accessible ramps , 4" wide painted striping , for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval . 9 I i r 5 f • • 3 . All interior sidewalks shall be raised above parking lot surface the height of a standard continuous curb, and noted on the FSP; 4 . "No Parking" signs shall be installed along the length of the drive isle bordering the sidewalk at the front of the new retail store ; . 5 . The applicant shall file waivers of protest to the creation of an S. I .D. for the proposed "Front Street" Arterial/Peripheral truck route , and for the creation of an S . I .D. for the signalization of the intersection of Peach and Rouse ; 6 . The Stormwater Drainage/Treatment Plan basin sizing and discharge calculations , discharge destination, and a stormwater maintenance plan must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 7 . Plans and Specifications for the water main extensions prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. 8 . Plans and Specifications for any proposed water main and hydrants, or fire service line must be prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) , and be provided to and approved by both the State W.Q.B. and the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the water main and hydrants , or fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for the Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings . 9 . Proposed water main and fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to construction of the new building. *Note: Condition #9 as written above calls for the installation of the proposed new water main and hydrants prior to construction of the new building . The Planning Staff are however of the opinion that as this is not a subdivision PUD, and the new building will be serviced by existing water and sewer services located on North Broadway, and therefore should be allowed to begin construction of the new building prior to the installation of the new water main and hydrants . The Planning Staff has contacted the Fire Marshal regarding this matter, and he concurs with the opinion of 10 • the Planning Staff. The Fire Marshal and the Planning Staff recommend that the following amended Condition of Approval be considered in place of the above stated Condition #9 : 9 . (Amended) That the proposed water main and hydrants as shown on the plans and submitted to the State W.Q.B. and the City Engineer, be installed and in service prior to occupancy of the new building, and that no occupancy permits shall be granted nor any Financial guarantees accepted prior to said installation and completion of the service . 10 . Sewer and water (domestic and/or fire ) services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent,. City of Bozeman Applications for service shall be completed by the applicant. I 11 . The sidewalks and parking lot approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City' s standard approach ( i .e . concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval . 12 . Asphalt or Concrete headers shall be provided around the perimeter of all new asphalt not contained by a concrete curb. 13 . The configuration of the off-street parking area shall comply with the requirements of 18 . 50 . 120 of the Zone Code unless a deviation or variance is granted by the governing body. In particular the narrow drive aisles between the buildings , and the NE access must meet code requirements for width. 14 . The extent of the previous Fridley Street vacation must be delineated. 15 . Fridley Street shall be designed for paving to a City of Bozeman local street standard, including curb/gutter and sidewalk, and shall be completed to a minimum width of 24 feet by the applicant in such a manner as to lend to future completion to the City Standard. Paving shall be completed to the eastern-most parking lot access . If Fridley is vacated the DRC recommends the adjoining property owners enter into an agreement for a shared access at the existing R/W centerline . 16 . All existing and proposed utility and other easements must be shown on the Final Site Plan. City standard form water line easements shall be filed by the property owner prior to FSP 11 i I f I i approval . 17 . Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the access sight triangles, but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder) . Design Review Board 18 . That in the event the dust control/abatement program fails , and dust from the lot becomes a problem, that the applicant be required to pave the truss plant employee parking lot as originally conditioned in the approval of the truss plant C.U.P. CUP Conditions required by Section 18 . 53 . 030.G 19 . The right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 20 . That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use and shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns . 21 . That all conditions specifically stated under any Conditional Use listed in this Ordinance shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns . 22 . That all of the special conditions shall be consented to in writing by the applicant. Boiler Plate Conditions 23 . Seven copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections, and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approved by the Planning Director within six months of the date of City Commission approval . Signed copies shall be retained by the City departments represented on the Development Review Committee, and one signed copy shall be retained by the applicant. 24 . The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal . Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement . 25 . The first Building permit must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan Approval . Building Permits will not be issued 12 0 until the Final Site Plan is approved. No site work, including excavation, may occur until a Building permit is issued. A separate Building permit must be obtained for signage, prior to installation of any signage. 26 . If occupancy of the structure or commencement of the use is to occur prior to the installation of all improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve ( 12 ) months ; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine ( 9 ) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. attachements: - site plans , elevations , submittal document - DRC and DRB meeting minutes - Planning Staff summary to DRB - written public comment i 13 I i BOZEM* CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE BOZEMAN 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE CITY-COUNTY P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 PLANNING OFFICE PHONE:(406)586-3321 Ext. 227 i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public hearings to be held before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board at 7 : 00 P.M . , Tuesday , 6 October 1992 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall , 411 East Main Street , Bozeman , Montana, and a public hearing and public meeting before the Bozeman City Commission at 7 : 00 P.M. , Monday , 19 October 1992 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall for the review of a Conditional Use Permit Application for a Commercial./might Manufacturing Planned Unit Development review requested by Westland Corporation , 1.24 North Wallace Avenue , Bozeman , Montana, pursuant to Section 18 . 54 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance . The Conditional Use Permit application would allow the applicant to construct a new retail building , and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their- business , Simkins-Hal.lin Lumber Company , that is currently located on North Wallace , to the proposed new building and site , thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site . The subject property is described as Lot 18 , Block 46 , and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 ; Lots 1 through 8 . inclusive , in. Block 46 ; Lots 9 through 1.6 , inclusive , in Block 46 ; and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately, 3 . 98 acres , all in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman , Gallatin County , Montana , and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. Said property is zoned "M-1 " ( Light Manuf.acturinci ) District . and is approximately 8 . 5 acres . Oral and written testimony will be taken at. the public hear. ing,s before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board and City Commission . "taps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Bozeman City-County Planning Office , 35 North Bozeman Avenue , 586-3321 , Ext . 227 . For. _ more information , or for those who require accommodations for disabilities , contact the C.it�'-COUnty Planning Office . °a� Andrei. C . Epi?l e °° Planning Director _ 1CIFL.e O / ►'s PLEASE F'U1;I_ISII 'THIS \CiTTCE WI`rH vAv� THE: THPEE INCH BY TBRF.E' INCH SUBJECT VIC;T\lT�' MAP , o PROPERTY ON SUNDRY , SE:P'fEMBE:R 20 , 1992 Q A IAE 1 ' �`BOZL�' • THE CITY OF BOZEMAN • 411 E. MAIN ST. P.O. BOX 640 PHONE (406) 586-3321 BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715-0640 88.___ a� Co. � October 1, 1992 TO: City-County Planning Staff FROM: Phillip J. Forbes, Director of Public Serviceo�:'­ RE: Simkins P.U.D. - Traffic Impact Analysis After reviewing the referenced report, I offer the following comments for your consideration. 1. The report appears to be accurately done and responsive to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Of the arterial intersections analyzed, the intersection of Rouse and Peach is the only one with a turning movement below Level of Service C. Peach eastbound traffic turning onto northbound Rouse will be at Level of Service D. This intersection is proposed to be reconfigured and signalized in the Transportation Plan Update draft (TSM Project NE2). This impact analysis predicts that of the traffic entering the intersection during peak hour, approximately ten vehicles are a result of the P.U.D. 3. I believe implementation of the Truck Route(s) identified in the Transportation Plan Update draft would change the traffic assignments offered in the impact analysis. Specifically, in my opionion the exclusion of trucks from Sourdough Road, Willson Avenue and Main Street will change traffic patterns to and from this site. l have tried to illustrate my concerns on the attached figure titled "Estimated Additional Traffic". In the event operational problems occur at the intersection of Broadway and Main it would not seem prudent to make any expensive improvements at said intersection, given the "temporary"status of Broadway's designation as a local truck route. Other, regulatory controls may be instituted until the Front Street connection to Main is constructed. The applicant should be advised that restrictions on trucks making left turns off Broadway at Main may be forthcoming. HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK i - 4. A signed, sealed copy of the analysis should be retained on file in your offices. 5. Based on the above, consideration should be given to requiring the owner to sign waivers of right-to-protest creation of SlD's for improvements to the Front Street arterial/truck route and the signalization of Rouse and Peach. Please contact me if you have any questions. cc: Craig Brawner, City Engineer File . �sT�/v►� �,�D �o��rio�l� L T2A/�i��c . 3 0 PEA c/y 30 'may S TF 3 7�y 7'i2i/'S 227 , 32-5 Nfw �c) E.. C� CITY OF BOZEMAO P.O. BOX 644B0ZEMAN, MT 59771-0640 • (406) 5BG-3321 TO C►/ � w Il��1� DATE DATE ` Lz - ���q,s�_-C►�wa�{ ��-�CQ��L RECEIVED BY BOZEMAN -° �7 Svc o� z ems— �9-�• OUPJ-Y-R�A I -0 1 dtroLI41�c4ov- coL(cs y04 ct .5k;c DATE BY ��� �I,� ,p� v�``��i�►`"1�i�5 / SIGNED Item a NN73 The Dr big Board,Dallas,Texas 75266.0429 ®Wheeler Group,Inc,1982 INSTRUCTIONS TO SENDER: INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER: 1.KEEP YELLOW COPY. 2 SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES INTACT. 1.WRITE REPLY. 2.DETACH STUB.KEEP PINK COPY.RETURN WHITE COPY TO SENDER. C.J, O 0 0 © p 0 d OE-: P_ T 1 P I a A T M OF 0ANM � S {-{ c co PLANK I Nc5 a I RIEC- TOR S APPROVAL I � 00 A N m i a n 53 TIC i O. A T-T-O- Oir AGC1= PTANGr 0I' GONO I 710N9 — � r -yaw -- ---- - - _— _---.-_---___ n�"'ce" -u -`�az ! a{ +G •4r _; 'e 1 ,.;r )�ui,'r µ I F.3+::,,,.H !- - - -- - - ---- -- +fk. �QEA ENNS eL RAXiN!US '/ANIGA ,w 1 =AEl RE ► � ) ' o i i E yl � SGGTG!!DINE - INUS SY,_'/ESTR:s 77777 __ ____ __ / 1 T pF g w BLUE GH!A UNIP=RD - s;,� G}+IP) UR®$ G SJL 1 II rc\1 O'U.AKIh6 As--EN �((� L o EXTERIOR 16HTING _ `_ _-_. =-t ' 170TAL NC'4746 wG:Di•7 - `\\\ � �V (O AT 201 MINIMUM SIDEYARD EXCEEDED BY 10': 5 PTS. ADDITIONAL SIDEYARD PLANTINGS: 10 PTS. mom. FRONT YARD: 5 PTS, FOR spec Plc SIDE YARD 5 PTS. .I` : fu a� L CL-. ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR 8 PTS. ���; I ,I I ,_...• RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY ...•y --► /� I �I PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING! 10 PTS. (( II!! TOTAL POINTSs 33 PTS. U POINTS REQUIRED 1 23 PTS. � ; POINTS BEYOND REQUIRED: 10 PTS. CU�f�! � � I�� NOT TRASH !-OSURE 15 "a SHOWN AS 'JCANT WiLL I �Y USE EXIST)\ ;V-SITE TRASH ,u�p•,�I,,1�m*e. RECEoTACLE IW y2l'•.� o ML 'r PAM�nw�U¢PG,exlOaiGo I Al irxi.m�+a� e•uuw.e'ee 77 q mores<+�'m:rv-•,�•o.�"' 1 1 CMG ANp 6UnLO GE'tNL 3 GONG.TfIGG/tlY PARIGN9 GJRG G GONG.PARCRq CURD LOT 15,BLOCK 46 AND LOTS 16-27,BLOCK 4-1, Inmm,G LOTS I-5,BLOCK 46,LOT5 6-16,BLOCK 46 SECTION OP THE NORTHERN PAGIPIG ADDITION TO BOZEMAN,MT. q �` �` AN IRREGULAR PIECE OP LAND IN THE NORTHERN PACIFIC �,,' I�� STET I CJ I I�..7: ��I� e .� ADDITION AS DESCRIBED IN THE P.U.D.SUBMITTAL /� L�I '`� P �/ ,n BOOKLET TO THIS PROJECT. �,YARD LIGHT - A C 1 1 I I E C T: G 11� `'O 6 A L. L A T I N C O U N T Y M O N T A N A - ) r 180-7 A. DICKERSON, BOZEMA :, MONTANA 5Q'115 OANEAS: 1 ESTLANM CORPORATION PERIMETER LANDSCAPE AREAS: ab) h286 SOFT. g� }�I y�g�G C/O 51MKIN5-HAL.LIN LUMBER,124 NO,INALLAGE,BOZEMAN,MONTANA FARKING LANDSCAPED AREA: (496) MCI SQ.FT. EN INF_F_75: i'�aOC,<Y MOUNTIN F.'46II�iEd.Al`� S F OPOSED LAND USE: L16HT MANUFACTURING, 5UILDINcv MATEI IAL SALES 60Q IN. MENDENHALL, BOZEM �, MONTAN 5cl-715 TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS: ?:��) 940:� SQ.FT. I ZONED: M-1 LAND USE: L16HT INDUSTRIAL 5TREF-7 �t7���55: 500 5LPOG '�' OF NO.5"OA�11/NA"° AREA FOR PARKING $ DRIVES: 3C°'O) 11146 5Q.FT. REVIEIAIED AND APPROVED fi�OVED BY: GASFIMAN N RSEI1' �- > TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE: ?9S) 11808 SQ.FT. — FINAL SUBMITTAL: SEPT 1, Icqal2 �� 9-i-9z TOTAL SITE AREA: :03� 5Q.FT. ��t��: SEFTEIM5�� PERMITS REWIRED: SUILDING ; FLOOR TO AREA RATIO: .311 (, PARMIN(S STATISTICS: PUBLIC ST BEET �.®.Y'd.�o: Oho MAXIMUM BLDG.'HEIGHT: 40, 0 - qqqPF- BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: OFF-STREET: 33 ` ACTIVE I d-C7-,r!ATI®N F A: NSA MAIN LevEL: TOTAL: 33 808 S.P. (SA1E510272 S.F„OFFICES 1536 S.F.) ago S.P. (R9RUIRED SY GODL°. 27) UPPER LEVOL: - TOTAL: _ z I i. V - 0 © Q p P\O \c"o 7z L 1* CRITICAL VIEWS OF SITE R-3 M_1 FROM RESIDENCES ACROSS STREET eOzEnnwLU TRANSVIESION M-1 jv z ❑ - -� i SOP Q R3 E � � Q ❑ ❑ P � �❑ ❑ ❑pao ❑ � � i� z -- - �.._ - ------------------- - -- -- - - _ PAYED - , ''STORM DRAIN. i i VAN LNEAhS Z GARAGE J z 1J I I I I I�n M-1 Q ❑ ❑ i F012 SRE SPECPICS, I I WAREHOUSE ITE DETAIL DRAWQVG ❑ _ - 71 � 9 ❑ o -3 M- STORAGE I : VY� N .. 0,9 LOT - LJ - r - --- - TOREL7 4ATERIALS ---1 f✓ � 11._ / yq. TRAFFIC,LANES I�; SV� r EXI5TIN9 sqqo Ile co iPlur Ave. I� \ �V M-2 5GALE. 1" &0'- 0" G° "'e� ✓ TOTAL SIZE• * \ 8.5 ACRES /- \\ RAILROAD SPUR �. 1<1 - -, SITE VICH= MAP Q NO 5GALE -- — P1 A n c� c Lo I I 11' IM11111111 I Q I z SCALES 1/16" - 1'-0" 0 ( ON tl S�,1d I ---- OFFICES ABOVE l aP. N I � I m S' ("a t[_; 7' 111 l.E? li., F-, `, 77 ?i 0) k 1�1 SCALE- 1/16" - I'-O' 10 I \ - I � >> .77 I � o S SCALE! 1/16' - 11-0" I i b-1 9-4 1�1 4 SCALE, 1/8' - 1'-0" H N L IE V E L MA Ill Irr , HIE �v �� Al- SCALEt 1/8" - 1'-0' 1. - - J C) 0 Cy a p 0 p n EXISTING / I HYDRANTtu RANGE Q PROPOSED � SION Q ..°°■■■■■e ,�° HYDRANT sNOP / ♦oo'° LL ° °° RADIUS /" 4 R RE - ♦° �♦RE3IDBQRAL(3) % CA ----- ---------------BRO---�Y---------�--------5¢"JJE+JPL4INN€ ---- -- ------ ----------- ---- --------- ---- --- — ------- --------------- -- - ♦ -- '------------ �— ------------- - -------- - ----- -------- -- - ---- ---- PAVED • -� • - --- -`----- -------`---------- -----+-----p---- ----- • • J / ■ • ---------- --------- 5T DRAIN 304 N BROADWAY BBRROAADWAY a a �T r�1a n� a u NORTH AMBUCAN a b I I IDI I VAN LWE8 OPOA B UMO wAREhIOUSE ♦ I J % a '�q� 918 E FPoDLEY a °O° ♦ , � 'rT _ /� ; ' 49 ■ °° °♦° NEW o♦♦♦ ♦° - PARKING LOT VL _ _... ♦♦fie - ,� __ _ ,.. / ; _.. _ _.. _ ___ _._. _...._ , ■ TORED MATERIALS no • ♦ f if/ `\D\\-\ \,\ .♦ TRAFFIC.LANES ° ♦♦° ♦ , � PetWns '� •� Aye. 1U�-1 J � DD � N D� Plu� Ave. Bro way I �� �'� �\ SCALE I" = 60' O" m o� Mea ow \ s C res i Ln YM-2 \ F y' swam =RAINT SITE STUDY VICE= MAP NO SCALD d A 4 t) SIMKINS- HALLIN L UMBER CO. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN r, ,, el ,, p, r' p, •,y p, t. 1W � 1 'aaa I a5.3 ' f � - . - -1 - .. ! 84.7 L.k84Ja .p, / 82.2 i I l •rl 7 I p`\ w ; p,�s I I •,J, iI p I 'I I I EXISTI c ELEVATION -ERISDNG CONTOUR ) PROAOSED ELEVATION z1 I xa82 SIDEWALK ` es2 y„. �Fz9x I m- ;a ♦ + _..•-:..\' x'-.:.< ._.�. + 9 fit � '� J 847 ypB3.9 - - xt3. - 821 - ° `•' CD 1 a =1 81 8 MwD 3/4'wide clot _ wuwJm En DEPRESS"URB' X I I I AT LOW FCdNT �� ;v W ,1 •f�j�p q I I _..—__-. ._.. - OUTLET STRUCTURE •? EL=57.6 ,1 JJJ I __ 1 I 3/4-WIDE SLOT,VERTICALLY I I PROPOSED BUILDING p L IN 15•I.D.RCP OUTLET STRUCTURE. .� OUTLET STRUCTURE: le I.D.RCP SET A MINIMUM OF 12"BELOW GRADE STORM WATER DETENTION (WASHED AGGREGATE SURFACE) BASIN. MINIMUM VOLUME i FILL WITH CONCRETE TO ELEVATION OF BOTTOM -720 CU.FT. OF DETENTION BASIN. 3/4'WADE SLOT(VERTICAL)FOR INLET. 4'PVC PIPE,OUTLET,10 FT.LONG. FLOWUNE(OUT)a 81.65 .z e4.7 •---wa3.9 N 1\ ,-..^ e29x L _� \\.\ w,�'e _ I / -_ TI 84.0 i1.2x.\. p \ EXISTING BUILDING I \ �o I 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1'=20' Prepared By. Rocky Mountain Engineers P.O. Box 883, Bozeman, Montano 59771 (406) 586-4859 w ! 7 1 7 _ -.mow 1 7 0� /\ • I0-34 UROAN S'1'REEIS WORKSIIEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Paige 1 Lucalion:__�f��= c f5 -_,Z�o vt Name: HOURLY VOLUMES EST/� �,a-rt� � T�, 'z..���✓ Grade % S'I'OPg — YIELD❑ V12 V111 Vlo N 1 V 6 72, N=[Z] VS 3 2-5 N=Q V4 Z/ Grade % �— Grade 9'0 7 � VI major road 270 V. u�� 3o V3� sTVP1 N =Q V,VB V, YIELD O 91s171 —— Date of counts: minor road Time Period: Pc4 cy Average Running Speed: 30 PI IF: Grade VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume(vph) 71 27v 3o Z/ 32 7Z 8 S7 /1— //S 4S 37 Vol. (pcph), see Table 10-1 78 Z3 = L3 /9 /30 ¢9 4/ VOLUMES IN PCPll 4/ 49 /30 NA V12 VI1 1110 V1i NA vs — 78 v4 23 NA vl �— NA vi V) V, vp Vy (ildad) b'6- X X ' (tld)d) X : 6 ' X X XSb2 = bd X Id X Id X d X°IJa_01`"3 I'd X I'd X d X Id X IJa=�Wa t°aIllaede.) IenpV q&d—5--g-2. =OIJa tldad Sf>'Zj=id (£-Ol 'S1:1)Ja'AlpedeJ leilttaµnd (:)as) �� • -(:)as) (Z-Ol 'ghl.)'.I.'deE)lealjljJ ►Id^ t,£8= + F 9 +�sZ tld^ ;S8=T+ f b + �[ °t'A=6A+8A+(£dais) "'A c'A=it + "A+(£dais)8'A 'A 'sM01:1 SullalUuo] O'A� I L laallS Joull.q ntnia.1.-14 AM I.S (t{dad) 8 6' X b6 " (tldid) 1^6 ' X X S�-= ;5�5 Y X o 1 £ =03'S I'J X Id X IIJa= IIWa �d X Id X NJ a=eWa "'a'.(jl�edej IenpV I td 68=ed (S-ol 'S!:I)J '�nlaea aauepadutl %T=00, X(I tda/t tn) %—T—,)7-=001 X("Ja/"n) pazlmn Ja 1n jttaata,i tldad 58� = IIda tldad _"Ja (£-01 'Sl:l) lellualn.l (aas) o -9 (:)as) (Z-01 'gt'L) '.1.'der IeallltJ gdnS.�-= // +oG2+off' tid^-TZT=7Z +SZE +Z +-7T+ oG2 + S� 11'A='A+zA+'A+'A+'A+9AZ/1 83A=I,A+SA+9A+'A+zA+`AZ/1 'A 'sntttl:l 91111a111ttn7 it "A 1 laa�lS;ottllVtttnl.l111.:£J:I.I.S tldad—6�a= Idaa'Allaede:)lenpV =Id I'd (S-01 'S!J)d '.tnlae_l axtepadutl %�_�=001 X(IJa/'^) % ,Z =00, X(,d:) pazllllfl Ja In jltamaj tldad o a = Id tldad o 68 =►Ja (£-01 'Sla)Ja'Aipudu7 lellualo l (aas) o J (:)as) 05 (Z-01 '9g1.)'.I.'de;)leallljJ tidn G6� = S—of +---ZL` tldn oaE =T+ o,�- I'A=''A+9A raA==A+'A 'A 'sntnl:l SullallPlo, 'A �--- �A IaailS in(e jq tttoi:l.1.1 tZ Ja IS tldad 52 L =1Ida=ztWa tldad--ro-=6da=6,:) "'a'6llaede,lenlaV 1K . =It J j7-67=bd (S-01 'S!:11 d '�nlae l auuepadull %�=001 X(ztda/Ltn) % -V Z =OOl X(6Ja/6^) pazlllin Ja In luama l tldad—Z-_=IJa tldad v e. =6da (£-01 'Sl:l)Ja IAII:)edu,lelltiajnj (aas) S s (aas) yr S (Z-01 'qeO 3.1. 'de7 je:)!1!iJ =I'A=sA+9A Z/1 6'A==A+'A Z/l 'A 's"11:I SttlPlUt"D :tA 6A laa.ilS JmtllV utnta .Lll l .IJ Is z a9e,I SNOi.I.33smi m qn-uno.-i mo.-i .I.am ismuom �I' Ill srjnl p'.isu:i I ttl ol'in tinwin 436 • URBAN SIIt1:L•IS • WORKSIIEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3 SIIAREU-LANE CAPACITY vI vl+Cs11= where 2 movements share a lane (VI/C..)+ (VI/Cm) - V I 4'VI+ V k c511= where 3 movements share a lane (Vi/C.1) l (VI/C.1)+(Vk/Cmk) MINOR STREET APPROACI MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 Movement V(Pcph) c,,,(pcph) csl I(Pcpli) cR=csl l — v L.OS 7 Z3Z 03Z 2- 8 L3 3So _ 75 9 6 00 MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 Movement v(pcph) Cm(PCP") Csn(PCPII) CR=Cs11 — V LOS 10 130 037 737 /0 7 U 11 47 3sf 12 4/ 70 MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 Movement v(pcph) cm(pcph) CR=Cm — V Los 1 76 �'o0 7ZZ A 4 z 3 890 d 4,7 t1 COMMENTS: i EX/�5 T/N 6 A DT (i 9 9 / a ' o nl �1 .394o ° 90 g —,. SS t Y _ �S/TF_ 0 o� 0 4. 7 90 -9-0" 1 1. N 0 e6T/MA i ED ,qv0) rio,vsti L 724/5f16 � V 0 \\� S o PEA c f� �• 3J� Y 98 �V s'TF 37--s T2i/�S 70 227 i 0 C� 0 Ft-1TURr PEAK AIO Wle T,eAFPiG v r� m � 0 PEA c i� �-���S �- ,Sv f s �• �-� 4- 5 y m� X 85 /.c/ %= i 1. C� U 10-34 URBAN S'IREE'IS WORKSHEE'T F01t FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 1 Location:_ GAc-'l k 1A-t-lAC," Name: HOURLY VOLUMES jF_sT/�.i� �� �ciu►i�.rS Grade % S'I'OP� ZI .S4 2/ N= / / 0 YIELD[] V12 VlII VIo N 1 � V6 /3 N VS 54 N=0 V4 3 Grade % Grade —/,3 — VI major road SG V= h/,q(-c s 3 V2 CF g( N = /l V,VB V, YICLU❑ Z SS 3 Date of counts: minor road 'Time Period: /"Z= C-Al Average Running Sheed:_3 n III IF: Grade VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume(VI)II) /3 5(, 3 3 54 /354 Z / Vol.(1ullh), see Table 10-1 14 3 VOLUMES IN PC1'li z3 59 Z3 - NA V12 VII VIo V6 NA vs . /¢ -) V4 3 NA VI No vi NA V3 V, VB Vy Z do 3 lIIJ91U1JAl,lll:llIIJIIiIl9lil:IlUlJg III .IJ WORKSIIEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 2 S4 ET 1: It1'From Minor Street l V9 V12 Conlliclinl;Flows, V, 1/2 V3+V2=Vc9 1/2 V6+Vs=V,1: z + S� = SB vph Z_+ -5'4_=—Lvph Critical Gail,'T,('lab. lU-2) S,s (sec) s S (sec) Potential Cnpacily,CP(Fig. 10-3) CP9= /0 D 0 pcph CP12= '0 mo pcph 1'elcenl of C1,Utilized (v9/CP9)X 10U= �•3% (v12/CP12)X 10U= 2 % Impedance Factor, P(Fig. 10-5) P9= /_o P12= o.97 Actual Capacity,Cm Cii9=CP9=-2-2-0 o pcph Cm12=CP12— /00 O pcph S'l Ell 2: L'r from Major Street V4 --� VI Conflicting Flows, V, V3+V2=VC4 V6+Vy=Vc1 -3 + _= vph /3 + S4 = 4, 7—vph Critical Gap, 'I',('lab. 10-2) 5 O (sec) -5- a (sec) Potential Capacity,CP(Fig. 10-3) CPI=!n a o pcph CPI= in 00 pcph Percent of cP Utilized (v4/CP4)X too= 3 % (vl/CPI)X 100= /-3 % Impedance Factor, P(Fig. 10-5) P4= /_ o P1= Actual Capacity, C,,, Cin4=CP4= ef) O pCph C,ri1 =CP1 = /000 pCph STEP 3:Tl1 from Minot Street � VR � V11 Conflicting Flows, V, 1/2V3+V2+V1+V6+VS+V4=Vice 1/2V6+VS+V4+V,+V2+V1=V,11 Z + SG + /3+ .L_+ S4 + -3 + + -S4 + 3 = 1-41 vph 3 + 5�+ -3 = vph Critical Gail, (lab. 10-2) L-ID (sec) o(sec) Potential Capacity, cP(Fig. I0-3) CPR= 6 3 o pcph CP11 = a So pCph, I'encenl of c1,Utilized (vR/CPR)X 100=L% (v11/CP11)X 100= t-- 7 % Impedance Factor, I'(Fig. 10-5) 1'8= o• 9 P11 = 0.7(0 Actual Capacity,c C,,,R=CPR X P1 X 134 Cm11 =CPI1 X PI X P4 8/3 = 830 X 8 33 = eSO X a 98 X o (},Cpil) o. 9 8 X /. o (pcph) STET'4: L F Flout Minor Street V7 LV to Conflicting blows, V, V,R(step 3)+V11 + V12=Vc7 Vc11 (step 3)+VR+ V9=V,lo /4- .} " + 2/ = z/L- vph /I-�—+ ss + 3 =194 vph Critical Gap,T,('lab. 10-2) 6- S (sec) / . .5- (sec) Potential Capacity,cP(Fig. I0-3) CP7=`/ °Q pcph CP10=L pcph Actual Capacity,c,,, Cm7=CP7 X PI X P4 X"n l X P12 Cm10=COO X P4 X PI X PR X P9 = oo X -9,q X 1,,7o =7?.o XL o X /-o X . 9 4 X 92(pCph) _ 98 X .9-1�-X ,- o (pCph) . 10-36 • URUAN SIRMIS WORKSIIEET FOR FOUR-LEG INTERSECTIONS Page 3 SIIAREU-LANE CAPACITY vl+vi C511= where 2 movements,share a lane (vi/Cmi)+(VI/Cmi) • V f'I-V I-1-V k 1 Csr1= where 3 movements share a lane (VI/C.)i (VI/CmI)+(Vk/Cmk) MINOR STREET APPROACII MOVEMENTS 7,8,9 Klovement V(Pcph) c,,,(pcph) cs11(Pcpi') CR=Csn — V LOS 7 Z c� 39 ✓✓37 (,37 A 8 9 a MINOR STREET APPROACH MOVEMENTS 10,11,12 Movement V(pcph) C,,,(Pcph) Csll(pcph) CR=Csn — v LOS 10 23 &7fl G7u 1,17 A 11 _>r3 833 i 12 23 /moo MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS 1,4 Movement v(pcpl►) c,,,(pcph) CR=Cm — V LOS 1 14- /000 9 e (, A 4 -3 /o00 997 A COMMENTS: I i UNSIUNALIZED INIERSECIIUNS lu-P WORI(SIIEET FOR ANALYSIS OFT-INTERSECTIONS I.UCAIIUH: Zf' 'YIA.',) NAME: IIUUIILY VUI.UMLS (SST/�'���`�J VOLUMES 1N rcm Major Sltect: N 14 =,=, Q, s4 v, 3 Glade e V2 V,34 — V2 � V+ v 3 N..==F7---1 (�r- V7 V9 I Dale of Cuunls: (, I I34 Cl ST.P 7 67 linle 1'eliod: — ❑ YIELD Average Running Speed: 30 N= jI7 - " Minor Street: 1'lll': Grade 'I'o Bi�o4-,�w,4Y ��� VOLUME AD)USFMENIS Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9 Vulume(vph) L84 L 34 wS14, 3 4 Vial. see'table 10-1 37 7 37 SI EP l: ill'from Minor Siteel r• V9 Conflicting Flow, V, 1/2 V3+V2= 3 ♦ G 84 =67 vph(Vc9) Ctilical Gap,T,, and Potential Capacity,cp Tc= 5.S sec(Iable 1U-2)cp9= 9'pcph(Fig. lU-3) Actual Capacity,cm cm9—cp9— '�9Spcph S 1 El'2: Ll'Pruitt Major Sit eel V, Conflicting Flow, V, V2-I-V2= ♦ G� — vph(Vc4) Ctilical Gap,'I'�,and Putential Capacity,cp TC= S.S sec(table I0-2)cp,= q 9Spcph(Fig. lU-3) 1'elcent of rp Utilized and Impedance factur(Hg. IU-5) (v,/cp,)X 1W=L 1',_ • 9.S Actual Capaclly,cm CnA=Cp,= 99S pcph S 1 EI'3: hF Ftom Minor Stied -D V7 Culdlicthlg Fluw, V, 1/2 V21-V2"1-V,+V, —3♦�� F�="4 ♦ " = /_L vph Md CI llical Gap,T,,and Potential Capacity,cp T,=L sec(table lU-2)cp7 pcph(Fig. IU-3) Actual Capaclly,cm Cm7=cp7 X P,=1lLX . 95= no pcph SIIAIIED-LANE CAPACITY Sl I= V7+V9 if lane is shared (V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9) 3 04— (7+ ?'7, Movement No. y(11c1,11) cm(pcp11) csil(pcph) Ca WS 9 7 49S 4 3, 7 -;f9s — 458 q t 1 � fLi ^ UNSIUNALI'Llil) INII:kSLa:I1UN5 —_�--_-_—_ lu•Jl 1VOItKSlIEET FOR ANALYSI S OF T INTERSECTIONS LOCAHON: �l� its zn�l�/�+�' NAME: HOURLY VOLUMES C�=%is"�9?Y��/ VOLUMES IN rcru Mayor Street: N � --- — N=© — Vs Vs q�� — V V Grade � — Gr G Vl V4-- 2-� 4 y- — 8 Vr /�N=Q — V' t� ��V7 V9 / ` 1) V, V9 _L Date of Counts: 8 I Ed S70P 9 I Time Period: — ❑ YIELD Average Running Speed: 3o N=[]D Minor Street: PI IF: Grade % ?,"4AVw11y ` VOLUME AD)UST'MENTS Movement No. 2 3 4 5 7 9 Volume(vph) el.9¢ 8 44 1,s'( .14 Vol.(licph),see Table 10-1 48 9 4 8 STET' 1:RT[tour Minor Street r► V9 Conflicting Fluw,V, 1/2 V3+Vs= 4 + 6e4 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap,T,,and Potential Capacity,cP T,_ �-{sec('Iable 10-2)cP9= 49S pcph(Fig. 10-3) Actual Capacily,Cm Cm9=CP9=-11:��pcph S 1 EP 2: LF From Major Street t( V, Conflicting Flow,V, V3+V== B + 6 9Z vph(Vt4) Critical Gap,T,,and Potential Capacity,cP T _ �•>sec(Table 10-2)cp4= pcph(Fig. 10-3) Percent of cP Utilized and Impedance Factor(Fig. 10-5) (V4/CP4)X 100= n P4= Actual Capacity,cm Cm4=CP4 pcph S I EI'3: lT From Minor Street 'V7 Conflicting Flow, V, 1/2 V3+V2-t-Vs+V4='� +�+HSG•F " L---3d'gcph(Vc7) Critical Gap,'1',,and Potential Capacity,cP T,=2- sec("Fable 10-2)y=11�Z pcph(Fig. 10-3) Actual Capacity,Cm Cm7=CP7 X P4=L?X --93 = pcph SIIARED-LANE CAEACFFY sli= v7+v9 if lane is shared (V7/Cm7)+(V9/Cm9) Muvemenl No. v(pcph) c (Pc ph) c511(pcph) cit LOS 7 9 } 9 �9 4 4 �8 9 .� 44 7 � TRAFFIC STUDY for SIMKINS-HALLIN LUMBER COMPANY This report describes ther impact on the surrounding streets of the construction of the Simkins-Hallin Store at the intersection of North Broadway and- Fridley Street. The items studied are the amount of traffic before and after the proposed development, the capacity of the existing roads and the impact of the additional traffic on this capacity, and what, if any, improvements to the traffic controls will be necessitated by construction of the proposed store. The existing Simkins-Hallin store is proposed to be relocated from the current location at North Wallace and Lamme Street, to the southeast corner of North Broadway and Fridley Street. The most highly travelled routes of approach will be from the north and south along North Broadway. Traffic will access North Broadway at Main Street, Mendenhall, and Peach Street. A minor amount of traffic will access North Broadway from the streets intermediate to those mentioned. There are no figures available in the Trip Generation Manual for a lumber yard. Therefore, an estimate of the traffic that will be generated by the store has been made using sales and traffic figures at the existing store. The existing store makes approximately 250 sales per day. This would correspond to 250 vehicle trips per day. We have assumed that traffic equal to an additional 25% of daily sales visits the store without making a purchase. We have also estimated an additional 25% increase in sales at the new store. These assumptions provide an estimated traffic of 375 trips per day at the new store location. At the present time some of the traffic to the existing store also must make a trip to the storage yard where the new store will be constructed. It is estimated that 50 trips per day are made to the yard at this time by people who have made. a purchase at the existing store and must drive. to the yard to pick up materials. Existing traffic counts for 1991 have been used in this analysis. These counts were obtained from the City of Bozeman and Montana Department of Highways data. There are no existing traffic figures for North Broadway. Therefore, we have assumed a value for average daily traffic of 800 vehicles per day, based on the traffic counts of surrounding streets. Measures of capacity and the need for control are based on hourly volumes rather than daily totals. The design hour volume (peak hour) may be determined by applying a representative percentage (usually 8% to 12%) to the ADT1. A value of 10% was used in this report to convert ADT values to peak hour values. Figures at the end of this report show the values used in this report for average daily traffic, estimated additional traffic, and estimated future peak hour traffic. 1 A Policy on Design of Urban Highways & Arterial Streets, 1973, A.A.S.H.T.O., P.266. 1 An intersection analysis was performed for the intersections of E. Main and Broadway, Peach and Wallace, and Peach and Rouse. The computation she-eta for these intersections are included at the end of this report. The level of service will not change at any of the intersections reviewed. SUMMARY ANALYSIS The proposed access points for the site were placed to minimize the impact on the surrounding streets. All parking for the new store is to be on-site, and will not include parking along the curb of North Broadway or Fridley. There are no future off-site road improvements required for this project. Bicycle and pedestrian pathways are not needed within this project, and none are proposed. The ADT changes to the streets used for primary access to the site are shown on the accompanying figures. There will be no change in the level of service of any of the streets due to traffic generated by this project. The traffic that currently goes between the existing store and the storage yard, using Lamme, Mendenhall, and North Broadway will cease after the new store is in operation. This traffic currently includes forklifts carrying lumber to the existing store from the storage yard. The customer traffic that now uses Mendenhall and Lamme to go between the existing store and the storage yard will also cease. There is also no employee parking at the existing store site. Employees now must park on the adjacent streets and walk to the store. This parking will be eliminated with the new store location. The delivery truck traffic and parking that circulates around the existing store will also end with the opening of the new store. i There will be some increase in traffic on North Broadway and Peach Streets, and there will be some additional traffic at the intersections I with E. Main, Wallace, and Rouse. However, this increased traffic will not change the level of service of any of the streets or intersections. The advantage of this project is the reduction of traffic back-and-forth between the existing store and the storage yard, the reduction in on-street parking near the existing store, and the reduced truck traffic in the vicinity of the existing store. The North Broadway site is more compatible with the commercial use. Ray H. Center Montana Registration No. 5653 ES 2 I i R Rocky Mountain Engineers Civil Engineering & Land Surveying P.O.Box 883,Bozeman,Montana 59771 (406) 586-4859 September 28, 1992 Mr. Dave Grigsby Bozeman City.-County Planning Board 35 N. Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Traffic Study for Simkins-Hallin Lumber Co. Dear Dave, Transmitted herewith are two copies of our traffic study for the above referenced project. Please call if you should have any questions concerning the study. Best Regards, Ray H. Center, P.E. , L.S. • 212�829,90�!\! ti SEP La N (31 FILE MEMO - ----------------------------------------------------------------- BY: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 24 , 1992 RE: SIMKINS-HALLIN PUD ------------------------------------------------------------------- Although identified in the Staff report sent to the Design Review Board, and regarding the request by the applicant to waive the paving requirement for an employee parking area for the truss plant, as required through an earlier CUP review and approval , the Staff , DRB members, and applicants neglected to discuss the request at the DRB meeting and review of the Simkins-Hallin PUD proposal . Upon noticing this omission, I contacted each of the DRB members whom were present at the review ( 9/22/92 ) , and discussed the request to waive the truss plant paving requirement with them. Each of the DRB members were in agreement that the request was acceptable , and recommended a condition of approval , that in the event the dust control/abatement program fails , and dust from the lot becomes a problem, that the applicant be required to pave the truss plant employee parking lot at that time . I also contacted the applicant Tom Simkins , and the architect Dan Kamp, and informed them of the conversation with the DRB members and the recommended condition of approval , of which the applicant said he "had no problem with that" . The members present at the DRB review of 9/22/92 , contacted by phone, giving their consent, and in agreement with the above statements were, Ken Ryder, John DeHaas , Nick Davis , and Ben Tintinger. 1 t '�kf fiba6it of jjuhliratirrn p STATE OF MONTANA, SS. County of Gallatin, 1 0 Vivie Portnell , being duly sworn, deposes and says: That s he is Principal Clerk of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and that the notice hereunto annexed ( Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, requested by Westland Corporation has been correctly published in the regular and entire issue of every numbe aid p per for I romeeutive insert ioq the first of which publication was ade on th 2 day of September 19 , and the last on the 24th . ay of Sep embe 9 9 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 24th day of Se tembe 19 92 Notary Public for the State of Montana,residing at Bozeman, Montana NOTARY PUBLIC for Ure Slate*t VW" Residing at Bozeman,MonW2 My commission expires duy 6,low .f -4 1 I ,\ ., ,, .., � . - Q 20 BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE,Thursday,September 24, 1992 = aiel briefs ry - Detroit teachers defy Work order neighbors said.Scruggs was seen Tuesday morning at Ne - DETROIT(AP)—Striking teachers in the nation's his mailbox about 100 yards from the home. "W'S' RTH 1­.Elizabeth Scruggs had worked as an auditor.in the STOTh' :=seventh-largest school system largely defied a judge's RAGIE " Tennessee secretary of state's office for about three :-back-to-work order today and stayed out of class- - x :'rooms.They setup picket lines at schools instead. Years,according to her supervisor,Brook Thompson. "Our members have made it loud and clear that ::they do not wish to go back to work until they have a "She was at work Tuesday and seemed to be chip-. : per and happy"Thompson said. Have neighbors h� vehicle, etc. stored in the �� :contract they can live with,"said John Elliott,president Scruggs,34;was the youngest of Earl Scruggs complained about front of your home? Need :of the Detroit Federation of Teachers: three sons.Along with brothers Randy and Gary,he was a member of the Earl Scruggs Revue,which their your boat, motor extra space for storage? The Board of Education had said classes for the dis- father started after breaking up his long partnership ::trict's 168,000 students would begin Monday regard- with Lester Flatt in 1969. home, trailer, extra Problem Solved. ::less of what the teachers did today,which was a prepa- 'The 68-year-old Earl Scruggs,a member of the ration day for the few teachers who showed up. Country Music Hall of Fame,received the National - On Tuesday,Circuit Judge Robert Colombo Jr.or- Medal of Art in June for his lasting contributions to I0-11-1 Storage for RVS, dered the 10,500 teachers to end their four-week strike American music. Cars, boats, risk being fined or jailed. He's perhaps best known for fast picking banjo and return today or L Union leaders initially told the teachers to go back, tunes such as the theme to the old sitcom"The Bever- - motorcycles, 1.but thousands stormed out of a meeting Wednesday ly Hillbillies"and"Foggy Mountain Breakdown,"used __ -_ a trailers, riding ;:chanting,"No contract,no work."They gathered out- as theme music for the movie"Bonnie and Clyde." ® — lawn mowers, -:side the administration building and vowed to stay out - "until the snow flies." Campers, etc. The teachers have been on strike since Aug.31 in a Danielle hangs off Carolinas While dispute over pay.Talks were to resume this morning. Hurricane.Charley spins near Azoresy _- ;:Detroit teachers with a bachelor's degree begin at MIAMI (AP)—Tropical Storm Danielle was mark- -'$27,000 a year and get$41,000 after 10 years. ing time off the East Coast today,but could reach North Carolina in a day or two,while Hurricane "Earl Scruggs' Son, daughter-in-law Charley was heading toward the Azores far at sea,a t a -found shot to death in home forecaster said. At 5 a.m.EDT,Danielle,with top winds of 45 mph, COTTONTOWN,Tenn. (AP) -Country music was stationary about 185 miles southeast of Cape Hat- star Earl Scruggs'son and daughter-in-law were found teras,N.C.,said Miles Lawrence,a forecaster with theme , dead in their house from gunshot wounds,authorities National Hurricane Center. said. - Lawrence said Danielle could reach North Carolina c� Police offered.few details,and Chief Deputy Gene in a day or so,but its course remained uncertain.It - Bullinger intended to issue a statement once the re- was located near 33.7 north latitude,72.9 west longi- +suits of today's autopsies were known,police dispatch- tude. ,� er Carolyn Dorris said Wednesday night. Hurricane Charley,with top winds of 105 mph,was Steve and Elizabeth Scruggs had lived in this town nearing the Azores,nine islands about 900 miles west u _30 miles northeast of Nashville about 31/2 years, of Portugal.It was moving at 5 mph. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS Only _� Call for details. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT $1 per In.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public hearings to be held before the Bozeman City-County Planning NORTHSTAR� Board at 7:00 P.M.,Tuesday, 6 October 1992, in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall, 411 East Main Street, • STORAGE Y rates Yearly Bozeman, Montana, and a public hearing and public meeting before the Bozeman City Commission at 7:00 II P.M., Monday, 19 October 1992, in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall for a review of a Conditional Use available 586-3090 fi Permit Application for a Commercial/Light Manufacturing Planned Unit Development review requested by • Close t0 town Westland Corporation, 124 North Wallace Avenue,Bozeman, Montana, pursuant to Section 18.54 of the City ofa} Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. ® . l The Conditional Use Permit application would allow the applicant to construct a new retail building, and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business,Simkins-Hallin Lumber Company,that is currently located on North Wallace,to the proposed new building and site, thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site. The subject property is described as Lot 18, 90 N \ block 46, and Lots 16 through 27, both inclusive, in Block `oo / 49; Lots 1 through 8, inclusive, in Block 46; Lots 9 through ° 4 16, inclusive, in Block 46; and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3.98 acres, all in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, F Pre-Season Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 Block of .. North Broadway. Said property is zoned "M-1" (Light . i 1�icwce Manufacturing) District,and is a roxirrtatel 8.5 acres. d r• t::...;<:;.., ' ' " . . 9) PP Y Suit 1... # Sae . : Oral and written testimony will be taken at the public : fi hearings before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board :' ®s. and CityCommission. Maps and related data regarding this P 9 9 �4 Y I s a be reviewed in the Bozeman City-County v� application may ry y z • Planning Office, 35 North Bozeman Avenue, 586-3321, Ext. © - - SUBJECT 227. For more information, or for those who require j i o PROPERTY'.L accommodations for disabilities, contact the City-County VERENDIR Planning Offic Andrew C. Epple r. Planning Director s , i , . . . . - Save $75! B fany� Gladiator Suits Orig $275J, \J N .. F TSMEN , Athletic fit styles in wool and fine wool blends for the man with °nt a trimmer waist broader shoulders and chest. Choose laid p s' h Y y pinstripes, chalkstripes and more. Save $75 On Save $1204145 On A FA Johnny Carson® Suits Evan Piconee Suits Orig.$250 Orig.$350-$375 z HER _ , 992999 : a All-season wool blends in a -Spice u our wardrobe with 4 ; py smart-looking variety of patterns, impeccable quality and fine , 1 IiA IYD solids and stripes for every man's contemporary style, now at a ' ward-robe! Classic two-button great low sale price.Single-or • - , z: jacket; plain or pleated pants. double-breasted in wool or } Made in U.S.A. wool-blends. Made in U.S.A. Come into,Big R onFRIDAY $r ................. „F • I "::.::.yr'°` z ...• . d, irr'y ��- �p a�"",�, C„ -�` �y "{.;K; � � ? '�c" F ? r ; 4 ' '. ::... :r y:. :.... .::: :.r• ..:.`. w J8,'u:'. 3 Wit' 9 'r oSEPT. 25th r . t : , To view demonstration and m h display o h f the r z..: : DeWalt•Hi h Performance g awa:, � s ra Industrial•PowerTools • B A Facto Re resentatwe ...¢ o......,. �. a See You There! r % � n 1 I High Performance Industrial Tools Save 20%! Luxurious Save 50%! Hooded Save 13%-26%! Washed Silk Shirts Denim Jackets Cotton Rugby Shirts Automotive ® Farm y—�y�� Home • Ranch Deep, rich solid colors with a subtle 100% heavyweight cotton denim Great assortment of heavyweight lustre create our most popular shirt with a built-in fleece drawstring rugbys in vertical and horizontal y for fall. Generous full cut. Reg. $35. hood. Orig.$60. stripes, rich colors. Reg$32-$38. SANDVIG' S SUPPLY • AM 431 N. 7th Ave sroREs Hours: Mon-Fri 8-5:30 Great Clothes Main Mall • Bozeman ' 586-8466 Don't Have To ON-FRI 10-9 • SAT 10-6 • SUN -5 Sat M 12 Be(Expensive Selection May Vary By Store.Interim Markdowns May a Been Taken. „ 0 0 . BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE,Thursday,September 24,1992 19 Health-care Poet under fire €� Y reform bill }$ C� K z _ Hungarian, for commercia approvedn v huk r Partridge C a CHICAGO (AP)—If poetry sold like bluejeans, WASHINGTON AP( ) � The Max Blagg would have nothing to explain. Senate is making a small down Instead Bla- gg's artistic integrity has been called D payment on overhauling the na into question by fellow poets because of a commer _ Pheasant j tion s health-cares stem. The fate 3 � %► Y cial for The Gap in-which he recites cool verse _ � of the effort hinges on how strong- about jeans that"fit like a glove—like an old lover ly President Bush sticks to his no- coming back for more.” SHOOTING PRESERVL tax-increase stance. Senate leaders of both parties Blagg said he has helped popularize poetry £tF • say they have been unable to get through the commercial.Plus he's no longer tend Mature Flight h Birds mg the president to say whether he q realize in a way I'm selling out,but you get re- , will accept a bill that has targeted ally sick of pouring drinks until 4 in the morning, .`. S'Ei AS`®N• tax increases to pay for a variety of the 44-year old poet said Wednesdays September 1 December 31 1992 programs, including some of hisown The ad,in which Blagg recites his poem"What AP economy.tbreaks to stimulate the Fits,"was the hot topic this week at a cutting-edge New York poet and television producer Bob • poetry festival in Chicago.Participants reacted with 5,000 Ranch Acres Bush pledged recently that he Holman poses Tuesday during Chicago's po- ' .would never accept another Demo- a mixture of derision,appreciation and a little envy. etry video workshop. • woulcrati tax increase.However,noted The black-and-white spot shows Blagg speaking YOU Hunt or We Will Guide Seri. Bob Packwood, R Ore., Bush in what appears to be a smoky nightclub.Inter- s himself had asked Congress for spersed are shots of a motorcycle and a young "At that moment,the commercial turns from be- Diamond Ranch, R.E.C. woman in tight jeans. ing a poem into a commercial because no poet several tax increases earlier this "Sky fits heaven so ride it, he begins. would ever use as trite an image as fits like a gyear. `What I don't know is if those love,"'said Bob Holman p P.O. Box 816 B i are still acceptable," Packwood child fits mother so hold your baby tight g ,a New York poet and said. "lips fit mouth so kiss them..." Emmy-winning TV producer. Ennis, Montana 59729 Now, senators have raised the And later,the jeans: Blagg,a British-born New.Yorker who has pub- ante. Without.dissent, the Senate "curved into the shape of your thigh lished three collections of poetry and short stories, For more information call: «like the were custom made said in telephone interview that he was offended -Wednesday night added to a$32.5 Y (406) 682'4867 billion catchall tax bill what mem- "to do just that." that his integrity had been questioned. bers of both parties called a mod- est first step toward repairing the health-care system. • The amendment, sponsored � "£= chiefly by Sens. Lloyd Bentsen, D- " Texas, and David Durenberger, R LMinn., would make health-care policies more affordable for small employers; make it more difficult N for insurers to exclude individualsBECAUSE SPORTSMEN PAY lYational from group coverage; and create a i Wild Turkey commission to advise Congressz and the president on reducing 4: THE POWDER HORN costs: OVER $3MILLIO'NEACH Federation Senators roundly praised the COMPLETE Mendenhall Men DAY W. de amendment, which represented SPORTING GOODS 303 one of the few times this year that B. en de FOR CONSERVATION Democrats and Republicans have q been able to agree on a major issue of social policy. - �> Sen. John Chafee, R-R.I., said theinability to agree on major 9 health overhaul should not block Mark Birrer III a" incremental steps. "The reality is Intermountain 1 , that we can provide more Ameri- � cans with better health care at a lower cost this year,"he said. Fi • a s nancial Group ,3, However,,said Sen. Nancy TER S Kassebaum,R-Kan., "This package I - would make only modest progress We Care. The Archery Center solving two core problems in - 1716 W.Main•Bozeman health care today: skyrocketing 0 "` costs of health care and continued lack of access for the uninsured." Underlying the health proposal: Gallatin ' ,ui , n Americans have n Ronald G 37 million a e o Wildlife , 1� t health 1nSllraQC , nth 6areeuo. , ^� �• i� < , �` (r im , y�wE9. • „ 1..:T E ` .t �a takes 14 per ant o ASSOCi t L s �." it 01 4hz''^.N a wd.,na• t e a 'U7 :tA+l' a'`°` iiS Ci; .p �-..;; ., ..,,�. ^y�i =^c' tv, i# -....._. .L � .:ii 1 come, a figurelcxpectelo�hit•IS� f ;r .1w • a , . ..�. eriana, .,.. , ." percent by 2000. '. P.O.Box 5331. t �' r Bozeman, MT 597 j"7 — RS. ]Presidents � Volunteers fo esn&wildrlifeg The ""Un-endangered Species" send Cap • v Then: In 1907, there were only 41,000 in the U.S. Congressman lz �, jF best wishes ARROW ELK Now: There are more than 772,000 elk in the U.S. £ RON EE ; SHOOTERS MARLEN WASHINGTON (AP) -Three Many people don't realize the pioneering role hunters and fishermen former presidents joined in best have played in America's conservation movement. Or the fact that these As an active hunter and wishes for a veteran assistant, Cas sportsman,I am a strong advocate sportsmen cont ributed over $16 billion for wildlife restoration 'and par Weinberger, as supporters Full Sales & Service of protecting our hunting heritage. passed the hat to help pay for his Archery Shop conservation programs. I am the original author of defense against Iran-Contra felony The elk, one of America's most magnificent wildlife species, seemed legislation to protect hunters from charges. headed for extinction in 1907. Today, there are more than 772,000—largely harassment by anti-hunters. I am confident that he will be ti vindicated,"Richard Nixon, who - p" g �' p- y GiiCa's huritei�. due to wildlife restoration �o ra���s aid for b-Arai made Weinberger his budget di- rector and then secretary of health, JOh11 MCKerina The elk isn't the only species to benefit from sportsmen's dollars: education and welfare,said in a let DavidTarrett Wild Turkey ter read to about 1,000 people at a a D reception Wednesday night J Then: In the early 1900s there were only about 650,000. DUDS'n SUDS Ronald Reagan, in a letter ad- dressed directly to the man he I Now: Today there are about 4,000,000 wild turkeys. named as his first secretary of de- New York Life fense,said,"While many may have r.' Pronghorn Antelope doubts about your legal process during those times, we must have Then: About 50 years ago.there were only about 12,000. faith—faith that thetruth will pre- - Now: Today there are about 1,000,000 pronghorn antelope. vail,fully exonerating you on these charges." Madison•Gallatin Chapter Canada Goose — — Former Attorney General Ed- Trout Unlimited MONTANA win Meese III said that Gerald Then: By the late 1940s there were only about 1,110,000. osys ` t. SHOP Ford, in whose presidency.Wein- ' I Now: Today there are about 2,500,000 Canada geese. Wein- berger continued as HEW secre- tary,also sent his greetings. Nixon indicated in his letter that White-tailed Deer MONTANA TROUTFITTERS he had contributed to Weinberg- `- Then: In 1900 it was estimated that there were less than 500,000. ORVIS SHOP er's defense fund. He did not say how much. Weinberger told re- Now: Today there are over 18,500,000 white-tailed deer. 1716 W. Main porters he faces "very heavy".ex Bozeman penses. Barbara Hayward, a Virtually-every species of native American wildlife from songbirds and spokeswoman for organizers pf the chipmunks to bald eagles and whooping cranes benefits from conservation reception, said from $15,000 to programs paid for by sportsmen. $20,000 had been raised before the To recognize the many contributions sportsmen have made to The n- event. Bozeman Outside the hotel ballroom conservation, Congress established National Hunting and Fishing Day® in laullet where the reception was held, a Rifle club 1972, to be celebrated on the fourth Saturday of September each.year. On table was set up.to receive addi- Saturday, September 26,join with sportsmen in supporting conservation. Holca tional funds. Inc The reception was sponsored in I part by the conservative Heritage ®yi y Jim Bennett NotionalHuntingFishingDa Se t, 20, 1002 Foundation. Weinberger is scheduled to go y on trial Jan.5 in U:S.,District Court in Washington five counts ob- Black Ram Montana Manhattan wll(lhfe struction and lying in the Iran-Con- tra arms and money affair. Bowmen Bowhunters umnyiEu Association He accused concealing Association FOR LEGISLATURE g g some 2,0 p00 pages of personal notes .<; � Logan Rifle Range '. that allegedly show he knew of 1985 arms shipments to Iran ap- For membership. is happy to sponsor proved by the Reagan White ; `!'® = information please write: Public Sight In Days �•ierwni,,, House. He has pleaded innocent, The Conservation Sept. P.O.Box 1942 t. 27 Oct. 4 Oct. 11 ROCKY MOUNTAIN having insisted since the Iran-Con- Great Falls,MT 59403-1942 Candidate e 10-5, $3 per gun ELK FOUNDATION tra scandal broke late in 1986 that he knew-nothing about the 1985 Call 587-2072 1017 S.Wiifson,Bozeman shipments. t� Weinberger, responding toNEEMEMS praise by former United Nations rT jrF 7 �� ti Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and - others, said his lawyers had ad- THESE MERCHANTS AND INDIVIDUALS ARE PLEASED TO RECOGNIZE LOCAL SPORTSMEN FOR THEIR ROLE IN C0NSERVA71aN. vised him not to discuss the c 0 . . Development Review Committee September 22, 1992 Members Presents Fred Shields, Dan Figgins & Roger Sicz . Staff Presents Dave Skelton , Dave Grigsby & Terri Yira. Project Review — Simkins—Hallin Dan Kamp & Tom Simkins present. Dan Figgins stated that he believed that the building should be sprinkled from Broadway, rather than putting in another hydrant, because he feels that by putting in another hydrant they are dispersing limited water further. Fred Shields stated that he disagrees, because he thinks the 6" main and the compatible pressure is fine down in that area, and he doesn ' t agree that there is not enough water in the area. Fred Shields stated that to just sprinkle one building and leave the rest of the site unprotected isn ' t a realistic solution for him. Fred said his comments of approval are based on the installation of an inside hydrant. Dan said had the building been sprinkled and the fire been put out before it spread , they would have been fine on water supply at the last fire, so that' s where his opinion comes from. He noted that it is hard to protect all of the exposures. Planner Skelton stated that they need to make a recommendation to the Planning Board on the application at the end of discussion . Planner Grigsby said the following conditions are from Planning Staff . He stated that the front parking lot row should be broken by landscape islands or a deviation will be required . He also noted that the required landscaped islands should be seeded in grass or sod , and provided with adequate irrigation . Planner Skelton said they have submitted a good landscape proposal , but they need to either supply the island or request a waiver of that requirement, as Code says there can be no more than 100 feet between landscape. Planner Skelton said as part of the PUD process, they can request a deviation to the island . Planner Grigsby said landscaping including boulevard trees should be installed on North Broadway and shown on the final site plan , the total of each landscaped area should be 75% live, and unless Fridley is vacated one more large canopy tree should be shown on the final site plan . Dan Kamp said they need views from offices to yards, so he wondered if there is any possibility of leaving that tree out. Planner Skelton stated that they could clump them to maintain the view. Planner Grigsby stated that drop curbs, continuous curbing and wheel stops, handicapped ramps, painted parking lot striping , and raised interior sidewalks must be noted on the final site plan . Grigsby stated that no parking signs need to be installed along length of the drive isle and a waiver of right to protest SID' s for front street arterial peripheral truck route must be signed . Tom Simkins stated that was already signed with the last remodel . Grigsby stated that a Building Permit must be applied for and received prior to beginning construction . Grigsby read Craig Brawners comments in his absence. He stated that Craig had noted that a storm water treatment plan would need to be worked out, (which Dave Grigsby noted was in their submittal ) , Plans and Specs for water main extensions should be provided and reviewed , applicant needs to provide construction engineering surfaces, plans and specs for fire service line need to be prepared and approved by City Engineer. Brawner' s memo also stated that the applicant will need to provide professional engineering services for inspection , sewer and water domestic or fire need to be approved and indicated on the final site plan . Craig Brawner further noted that the applications for service need to be completed , the water line must be shown in the center of the road , the parking lot approaches must be constructed to city standard , curb cut and sidewalk permit need to be obtained , asphalt or concrete headers not contained by curb, parking spaces should comply with Code unless a deviation is granted . Brawner further stated that the narrow drive isles should meet Code requirements for width, the extent of the vacation of Fridley Street needs to be delineated , paving must be to City Standard to the eastern most parking access, and if Fridley Street is vacated he recommends a shared access, the easements must be shown on the final site plan , adequate snow storage must be designated outside of the site triangles unless easements are obtained and filed to have it off the lot. Fred said his condition number I is the same as Craig Brawners #2. Fred stated that the water line and hydrants must be installed and in service prior to construction and shown on the final site plan . Roger Sicz stated that his issue was snow storage, but was covered by Craig . He also stated that the Street Department did not recommend vacation of Fridley Street, as the Public Works Director and City Commission must decide that issue. Roger said the new transportation plan should be considered before that decision is made on Fridley Street. Planner Skelton asked if Tom and Dan had any thoughts on the conditions imposed , such as the landscape island . Tom Simkins said he believes from talking to neighbors that the people in the neighborhood would rather see parking spots than the additional landscaping . Planner Skelton said the retaining wall kind of takes away the adamancy of the landscape island . He stated that the applicant should make the deviation part of their submittal then . Planner M�MMM Skelton asked if the water and fire line ok . He noted that they must be installed prior to issuance of a building permit. Dan Kamp said normally he understands not allowing construction until. the water line is in , but since this is a looping of existing lines they would like to see them allowed to have that done prior to occupancy, rather than prior to the issuance of a building permit. Dan Kamp said that this line goes in to a different area than where the building is going up. Tom said by the time the water line is approved then they have a long wait on the construction of the building , due to short construction seasons. Tom Simkins stated that they would like to not install the one canopy tree, so they can maintain visibility into the area. Skelton said they could cluster them to keep the view. Grigsby said he really feels they need to install it to meet landscape requirements, so they should probably cluster them. Tom said on Craig ' s issue of driving isles meeting Code requirements, that they don ' t plan to use the areas in question for driving isles. Planner Skelton said they could note on the final site plan that they won ' t be used for public or private driving isles. Phill Forbes said the fire marshall has say in whether that is ok or not. Dan Figgins stated that once the building starts to erect out of the ground , the water has to be there and it needs approval by the state. Dan Kamp asked if allowing this -one would create a _ conflict. with the Overbrook letter. Planner Skelton said the flexibility in terms of road improvements is fine, but the water must be in according to Planning Director Epple. Dan Kamp said water and sewer- .is in the street already. Phill said every thorn they hit always relates to getting too far along with the project, before utilities go in . Phill Forbes also noted that a traffic analysis plan is needed ., Dan Kamp stated that it is a catch 22 for them, because they want PUD approval before investing the time and money into submitting water plans to the State, but then water ends up holding them up. Phill Forbes stated that the traffic analysis needs to be submitted before site plan approval , and it should have been part of the review process. Phill said he told Simkins engineer when he spoke to them that they would have to get it in before the Planning Board meeting . Planner Skelton said they can discuss water before the Planning Board and Commission again , but they need to maintain consistency. Motion — Roger Sic: moved for approval of the projecti as per the conditions of DRC and inclusion of traffic analysis prior to the Planning Board meeting . Fred Shields seconded the motion . The motion carried . Phill Forbes said transportation plan should be in by next monday morning . Skelton noted they need to make a modification to drive isles issue, and request the deviation to the landscape island in the interior of the parking lot. Development Review Committee - September 22, 1992 Members Presents Fred Shields, Dan Figgins & Roger Sicz . Staff Presents Dave Skelton , Dave Grigsby & Terri Yira. Continued Project Review - Simkins-Hallin Planning Director Epple said there is no subdivision going on at Simkins-Hallin , and that is the infrastructure difference between this and Overbrook . He said he wanted to re-visit the DRC discussion after talking with Dan Kamp and Tom Simkins, but Planner Grigsby filled him in on DRC dilcussion and so he understood the issues better. Roger said they are trying to be consistent on every building . Phill Forbes said it is the applicant' s choice not to design and submit water specifications until PUD approval , so the time delay is their own fault. Dan Figgins said if it is not a subdivision and there is water in proximity then can they begin construction prior to infrastructure installation . Planning Director Epple said FSP and financial guarantee for services may be enough, they will research that. Sicz said this is clear cut with the hydrant across the street, but not all of them are. Phill said it is within the City' s rights to ask them to use the closest water main , even if they have to install it. Figgins said they do need to get Simkins-Hallin off Wallace. Phill Forbes said he lives on Broadway and Lamme and has a different view on that issue. Roger said it needs to be written out so that they understand it all the time, with each differing case. Dan Figgins said the situation changes every time so it is hard to be consistent. Epple asked how they feel about financial guarantee to cover the costs, and no building permits before FSP approval . Desig6 Review Board - September 22, 1992 Members Present: Ben Tintinger, Ken Ryder, Nick Davis and John DeHaas. Staff Present: Kevin Wall & Terri Yira Project Review - Simkins-Hallin PUD Dan Kamp & Tom Simkins. Planner Grigsby said they are proposing a 13,728 retail office structure and parking . Deviations have changed to also allow deviation of a landscape island in the parking area. Grigsby said the wall is 4 foot high retaining wall to help screen from adjacent residential area. They are also asking for 20 foot front yard setback and going with the extra screening . Grigsby said one of the conditions is that Broadway be landscaped minus the accesses and one more tree in the area - they would like to cluster for clear office view. Planner Grigsby said he' s not 'sure how DRB feels about this. Grigsby said one written comment from lady in 2nd block of Broadway who felt that her SID payments had been raised , so she felt she had subsidized the area enough -- which really wasn ' t applicable to the application . Tom Simkins said he met with the neighbors and there was general support. Dan Kamp said there- was alot of concern expressed about Broadway being formally made a truck route. Grigsby said as part of the PUD they are trying to utilize the Peach to Rouse connection as much as possible. Ken Ryder stated that it is sticky next to residential areas. Don Bachan said there is considerable neighborhood interest because the goals are to preserve residential character, and since it is recognized that there is a demarkation between uses they would just like the transition to be as smooth as possible. Bachan stated that the neighborhood wants off street parking as a predominant part of the plan , as there are not alot of garages in the area. He stated that he personally would approve of the deviation to the landscaped island and the front yard setback , as the neighborhood is more concerned about the aesthetics of the building , but he' s not sure they are in a position to. express concerns in that realm until Planning Board and City Commission . Ken said the point is well taken on parking on the west side of Broadway. Tom Simkins stated that is his problem now and he wants to alleviate it. Dan Kamp stated that by combining the two operations they will alleviate between building traffic . Ken Ryder asked if the egress would come down Broadway. Tom said they will try to encourage west entrance, but that won 't be the easiest. Tom said he is not sure what will happen to the old building . John DeHaas said if the new location will house almost all of the supplies, then that would be better. Tom said they are trying to keep loading to the back . John asked what the building material is. Dan said Dry-Vit at the entrance and metal siding around the rest of the building . Tom said they are going to try to do something to mitigate the glare off the old buildings. Ken Ryder asked about the distance from the property line to the buildings. Grigsby said there is about 20 feet now. Dan Kamp said they are only putting in one new building , the rest are existing . He noted that the deviation to 20 feet in the front yard is because they are adjacent to a stricter zone so they are required 25, but they want the deviation for landscaping . Ben Tintinger stated that this proposal addresses the neighborhood nicely with the landscaping , and from what he has seen he is in favor of the designs and deviations. Grigsby said signage is within Code, and the proposed Dry-Vit is scored and relieved . Grigsby asked if they have any color ideas. Dan Kamp said that they haven ' t discussed that yet. Motion - Ben Tintinger moved for approval of the application as submitted with the added landscaping Staff suggested and recommended approval of the deviations. Nick seconded the motion . The motion carried . I I Date Received: 9/4/92 DRB Review: 9/22/92 DRB Action: STAFF SUMMARY OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION #Z-92117 PUD REVIEW ----------------_ ------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT: WESTLAND CORPORATION PROJECT ADDRESS , 300 BLOCK OF NORTH BROADWAY, DISTRICT & ZONE: (NOT IN AN OVERLAY DISTRICT) , M-1 ZONE DATE: SEPTEMBER 18 , 1992 REPORT BY: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 . ) Project Description: The following application is for an Industrial Planned Unit Development to allow the applicant to construct a new retail building , and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business , Simkins-Hallin Lumber Company, that is currently located on North Wallace , to the proposed new building and site , thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site. The site is located in what is commonly referred to as the 300 Block of North Broadway. Said property i.s zoned "M-1" (Light Manufacturing ) District, and is approximately 8 . 5 acres . The applicant has proposed a new 13 , 728 square foot retail/office structure with associated parking areas and landscaping . The applicant has requested that the paving requirements from a previous C.U.P. review, for the employee parking lot at the existing truss plant be removed, and that a graveled parking lot be acceptable. The applicant has proposed a dust control program that would be required for all areas exclusive of landscaped and impervious areas . Code requires that when an M-1 lot is adjacent to , or across the street from another zone , the yard requirements shall be the same as the adjoining zone and buildings shall be screened with either a decorative fence or plantings . This would require a twenty-five foot front yard setback, because of the residential adjacency. The applicant has proposed a parking lot facing . y i • Broadway, that encroaches into the twenty-five foot required setback, and has requested a deviation. The applicant has proposed to buffer the area in front of the new retail building with planted screening and earth berming. 2 . ) List of Requested Deviations: The applicant requests a deviation to Section 18 . 34 . 050 Yards , of the Code , to allow the parking area facing Broadway, to encroach five feet into the twenty-five foot front yard setback required by Code . This would allow the parking lot to be located twenty feet from the front property line . 3 . ) Expressed Public Opinion: To date , the Planning Office has received only one letter. The letter dated September 15 , 1992 was in opposition to the proposed project. 4 . ) Staff Conclusions : The Staff has reviewed this submittal and offers the following comments for consideration: Staff has reviewed this proposal and is of the opinion that it meets the criteria established for reviewing Industrial P.U.D. ' s . The proposed new structure is an extension of an existing business and will help reduce the existing traffic congestion on Wallace Avenue . This new structure is also proposed for an area zoned for this use, and complies with the area' s Master Plan designation. The streets are adequately sized for any additional traffic . The proposed new structure is compatible with the surrounding industrial buildings , has been well landscaped and screened, and appears adequate for this type of use. Staff is supportive of the deviation to the front yard setback. The berming and screening in that area, should adequately protect the adjacent residential area. Staff will recommend that as a Condition of Final approval that the buffering and landscaping be continued and located the entire length (excluding driveways ) of the property bordering Broadway. A copy of the list of Conditions identified by Staff for this proposal , will be available at the DRB meeting . Staff would recommend that the applicant carefully consider the amount of, and placement of exterior lighting , which may be inadequate for the protection of this property. Staff has reviewed the sign proposed for this property, and as shown is within Code requirements for this zone. This P.U.D. proposal will be reviewed before the Planning Board on October 6 , 1992 , and before the City Commission on October 19 , 1992 , for Final Approval . The DRB is requested to recommend to the Planning Board either a "Denial" , "Approval" , or "Conditional Approval" of this Planned Unit Development proposal . de BOZO 0 �4 OTHE CITY OF BOZEMAN 411 E. MAIN ST. P.O. BOX 640 PHONE (406) 586-3321 ' * BOZEMAN. MONTANA 59715-0640 -- a co. i .. TO: DRC Committee FROM:" Roger W.Sicz , Street/Sanitation Superintendent RE: Simkins-Hallin PUD-Broadway and Fridley Street . DATE: September 22 , 1992 ------------------------------------ ---------------------------- The Street/Sanitation Department .has the following concerns and/or comments regarding the above referenced project: 1 ) Applicant shall install sidewalks along Broadway Avenue in accordance with City Standards . 2 ) Snow storage areas shall not restrict site triangles on driveway approaches.. 3 ) The City Public Works Director along with the City Commission shall decide on the street vacation of East Fridley Street. The new transportation plan shall be considered in doing so. 4 ) I HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public meetings before the Development Review Committee at 10 : 00 A.M. on Tuesday, 22 September, 1992 and the Design Review Board at 4 : 00 P.M. on Tuesday, 22 September, 1992 in the conference room of the Old Carnegie Library, 35 N . Bozeman Avenue , Bozeman, Montana, and public hearings to be held before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board at 7 : 00 P.M. , Tuesday, 6 October 1992 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall , 411 East Main Street , Bozeman, Montana, and a public hearing and public meeting before the Bozeman City Commission at 7 : 00 P.M. , Monday, 19 October 1992 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall for the review of a Conditional Use Permit Application for a Commercial/Light Manufacturing Planned Unit Development review requested by Westland Corporation, 124 North Wallace Avenue , Bozeman, Montana, pursuant to Section 18 . 54 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance . The Conditional Use Permit application would allow the applicant to construct a new retail building , and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business that is currently located on North Wallace , to the proposed new building and site , thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site . The subject property is described as Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive, in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3 . 98 acres in the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. Said property is zoned "M-1" (Light Manufacturing ) District , and is approximately 8 . 5 acres . Oral testimony will not be taken before the Development Review Committee and Design Review Board. However, written testimony will be considered. Written comments shall be directed to the Planning Director and received by the Bozeman City-County Planning Office no later than 5 : 00 P.M. , Thursday, 17 September 1992 . Oral and written testimony will be taken at the public hearings before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board and City Commission. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Bozeman City-County Planning Office , 35 North Bozeman Avenue , 586-3321 , Ext . 227 . For more information, or for those who require accommodations for disabilities , contact the City-County Planning Office . Andrew C. Epple Planning Director 9L Off, ao 0 FN i RDa.e r s ` oars DAvt 3 SUBJECT I o PROPERTY Q A � m I r i _ 29 _ (11) Commissioner Frost stated he attended the first meeting of Leadership Bozeman on Thursday and found it an enjoyable experience. He stated that 29 are registered for the program; and 24 were in attendance at the first session. (12) Commissioner Stiff noted the letter which the Commissioners just received from Congressman Pat Williams regarding Peets' Hill. (13) City Attorney Luwe stated he also attended the Leadership Bozeman session on Thursday. (14) Mayor Swanson submitted the following. (1) Attended the dedication of the Morning Star elementary school at 5:30 p.m. He noted that the school-was named after a Chief of the Cheyenne Tribe; and the ceremony included a dance and drum group from the Cheyenne Indian Tribe. (2) Asked Commissioner Vincent to provide the welcome at the Emily Dickinson school dedication on Wednesday, since he will be unable to attend. (3) Asked for Commission representation at the First Home Buyers' Club meeting on Thursday, since he will be unable to attend. Consent Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following Consent Items. Request for permission to conduct ASMSU Homecoming Parade - Saturday October 3, 10:00 a.m. - Main Street from Rouse to 11th Avenue Request for permission to conduct 10K CROP Walk for the Hungry - Sundays October 11, 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. - begin at Food Bank, North Wallace, East Main, Cypress Street, Old Highland Boulevard, Kagy Boulevard Linear Park, Church Avenue, Peach Street, North Wallace Street to Food-Bank - -` Deviation - to allow encroachment of 22 feet into the required 25-foot front yard ____1v._setback, Clarke T. Baldwin and Susan G. Penner, 719-721 South Third Avenue — ----- Commission Resolution No. 2878 - intent to annex 13.0-acre tract known as Parcel A and Parcel B, located in the W%, W%, NE'/4 SW'/4 and the E%, E%, NWY4, SWY4, Section 11, T2S, RSE, MPM (Schrenk annexation request, lying north of Main Mall and south of West Babcock Street) COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2878 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN, AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. i 09-21-92 - 30 - 2 Commission Resolution No. 2879 intent to Annex i 7. -5 acre tract known as COS Nos. 1353 and 1353B, located in Section 31, T1 S, R6E, MPM (Bridger Creek Development request, lying between Story Mill Road, the East Gallatin Recreation Area and the East Gallatin River, and the City landfill COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2879 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN, AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. Approve loan (CDBG) for housing rehabilitation; per recommendation of Loan Review Committee Authorize Mayor to sign 'Findings of Fact and Order for realignment and aggregation of Emerson School site Authorize Mayor to sign Findings of Fact and Order for Cascade Subdivision Phases I, II, III Authorize Mayor to sign Findings of Fact and Order for Evergreen Business Park Planned Unit Development Acknowledge receipt of application for vacation of Nickles Drive -Jim Kack; refer to staff Approve beer and wine license -Jackpot Casino Bozeman Inc. 1801 West Main Street - for Calendar Year 1992 Building Inspection Division Report for August 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission approve the Consent Items as listed, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. ti Adjournment - 8:50 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Vincent, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Vincent, Commissioner Knapp, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Swanson; those voting No, none. 09-21-92 MEMO ------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 21 , 1992 RE: SIMKIN HALLIN P.U.D. ------------------------------------------------------------------- The following is a list of items identified by Staff, that should be included as Final Site Plan (FSP) conditions for any approval of the Simkins-Hallin Planned Unit Development: 1 ) The front parking lot row is 145 feet long and has not been broken by a landscaped area, as per Section 18 . 50 . 100 D. 5 . c . ( 5b) of the Landscape Code that limits unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of 100 feet. The applicant shall either provide the required landscape section and identify it on the FSP, or request a deviation to the requirement; 2 ) All of the interior landscape islands shall be landscaped with the plantings as shown, and shall be seeded in grass or sod and noted on the FSP; 3 ) All landscaped areas shall be provided a hose bib or adequate underground irrigation system located within each landscaped area, and identified on the FSP; 4 ) Landscaping , including Boulevard trees , grass, screening , and buffering requirements shall be installed the entire length of the property bordering North Broadway (excluding drive accesses) , and shall be located and identified on the FSP; 5 ) The total of each landscaped area shall contain not less than 75% live vegetation and ground cover. 6 ) Unless Fridley street is vacated, there shall be one more large canopy tree bordering Fridley street and shown on the FSP; 7 ) All dropped curbs shall be identified on the FSP; 8 ) All continuous curbing and any wheel stops shall be identified on the FSP; 9) All handicapped accessible ramps shall be noted on the FSP; 10 ) All painted 4" wide parking lot striping shall be noted on the FSP; 11 ) All interior sidewalks shall be raised above parking lot • • �� . . � •,L. r , , � . +• � ... . , .. - ,� . . [ _ ,. ' .. � , r � �c .�. .. �I i _ . . f, > r � i � r ". r ,. r._ � .. ._ . . I. _. _ _ �cl_ _ � ' , � � , ' � 3 . r ��.. ,. A ' • � _ � i � I 1.1 .. J, .. ` � � ' _ ,t � 1 surface the height of a standard continuous curb, and noted on the FSP; 12 ) "No Parking" signs shall ,be installed along the length of the drive isle bordering the sidewalk at the front of the new retail store ; 13 ) The applicant shall file a waiver of protest to the creation of an S . I .D. for the proposed "Front Street" Arterial/Peripheral truck route ; 14 ) That a Building Permit be applied for and received prior to installation of any signage; 15.) That all applicable Building Permits be applied for and received prior to beginning any construction activities. � ♦4 Y� To: Development Review Committee From Craig E. Brawner, City Engineer Re : Simkins-Hallin PUD (/ Date: September 18 , 1992 The following should be included as Final Site Plan (FSP) conditions for any approval of this project : 1 . The Stormwater Drainage/Treatment Plan basin sizing and discharge calculations , discharge destination, and a stormwater maintenance plan must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer . 2 . Plans and Specifications for the water main extensions prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences . The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and Preparation of mylar Record Drawings . 3 . Plans and Specifications for any fire service line must be prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) , and be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings . 4 . Sewer and water (domestic and/or fire) services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent . City of Bozeman Applications for service shall be completed by the applicant . 5 . The parking lot approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City' s standard approach (i . e. concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval . 6. Asphalt or Concrete headers shall be provided around the perimeter of all new asphalt not contained by a concrete curb. 7 . The configuration of the off-street parking area shall comply with the requirements of 18 . 50 . 120 of the Zone Code unless a deviation or variance is granted by the governing body. In particular the narrow drive aisles between the buildings, and the NE access must meet code requirements for width. 8 . The extent of the previous Fridley Street vacation must be delineated. 1 Page 2 DRC September 18 , 1992 9 . Fridley Street shall be designed for paving to a City of Bozeman local street standard, including curb/gutter and sidewalk, and shall be completed to a minimum width of 24' by the applicant in such a manner as to lend to future completion to the City Standard. Paving shall be completed to the eastern-most parking lot access . If Fridley is vacated I recommend the adjoining property owners enter into an agreement for a shared access at the existing R/W centerline. 10 . All existing and proposed utility and other easements must be shown on the Final Site Plan. City standard form water line easements shall be filed by the property owner prior to FSP approval . 11 . Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the access site triangles , but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder) . cc: Phill Forbes , DPS �4 THE CITY OF BOZEMAN 411 E. MAIN ST. P.O. BOX 640 PHONE (406) 586-3321 * i BOZEMAN. MONTANA 59715-0640 CO �O'? TO: DRC ✓��/€ �2��S2 y FROM: Fred Shields, Superintendent of Water/Sewer �. 4d 1117 RE: Plan Review Comments '. DATE: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- /, on 4 ,�� �y� s .dam // (5' icy HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK � | '= Development Review Committee - September 15, 1992 Members Present: Fred Shields, Dan Figgins, Kyle Harlan and Craig Brawner. Staff Present: Dave Skelton, Dave Grig��by, Kevin Wall & Terri Yira. Project Review - Simkins-HaX%im PUD Tom Simkins present. Planner Skelton stated that a recommendation must be made to go to the Planning Board next week . Grigsby stated that there is no landscaping shown on the plans for the rest of the frontage. Tom Simkins said he understood they would have to do that. Planner Grigsby said that landscaping, accesses and the irrigation system must be shown on the final site plan . Simkins asked what they wanted for landscaping . Grigsby said 75% has to be live ve' itation . Planner Grigsby said they would also need to know height on yard lights, the drop curb accesses must be noted and no parking signs would be required in the drive access. Craig Brawner asked if they were going to vacate Fridley Street. Simkins said he thought so. Branwer said then he would like to see joint access there with a drop curb. Fred said there will be a 30' utility easement there that should be noted, but he doesn ' t � have an opinion on street vacation . Brawner said he would prefer one access with a maximum of 40' on the opening , with drop curb, gutter, concrete apron ect. He stated that if the road remained public they will have to look at access and paving , curbing ect and then the access would be off to the side. Brawner said from their perspective they are better off vacating . Fred asked if the landscaping would all still be required if the road was made private. Grigsby said some of it is parking landscaping required by number of spaces. Skelton said due to PUD if it is not a public street then boulevard trees would no longer be required . Brawner said his comments would hinge on the "if" of vacation then . Skelton said it should be looked at as public right of way now, and if they vacate that can be dealt with later. Grigsby asked if there is enough street there for public . Brawner said he would want standard street if it remains public , and that really opens up another realm. Simpkins said Fridley is already vacated from a point, but he is not sure exactly fromwhere. Brawner said he felt it would be appropriate to pave at least to the access into the lot. Brawner said they will need to show the location from where Fridley has been vacated on the final site plan . Simkins said he just wants access for people in the store and it will be warehousing from the existing building and then retail in the new area. DevelOpment Review Committee September 1992 Members Present2 David Cameron , Fred Shields, Craig Brawner, Fred Cheney & Bud TUSS. Staff Present" David Skelton , David Grigsby, Andy Epple & Terri Planner Skelton stated that a variety of .informals have been done on this project, there are members of the public present and there have been phone calls on this item. He stated -that this is technically not a public hearing , and the preferable way of handling public comment at this stage would be for- -them to send letters which will be distributed to the members for | consideration before the recommendation of this Board is made. ! Planner Grigsby stated that it would be located in the 300 Block of Broadway, and would be a new retail store and they would move the existing store. Grigsby said one issue to be dealt with Upfront is that the plans state that the street vacation of Fridley was requested by the Street Department, and Grigsby stated he received a call from Tom Wold stating that it is not their policy to, request such vacations. Dan Kamp stated that they pulled that comment off of the Concept Plan notes. He ! stated that the summary noted that and he will withdraw or - whatever--t d to be done in regardsto that � s ^ � .. ,� ,, . ,• • , . 'j � .. .. _ � � ., � , : . � , i ' � � �. r for trust plant was required to be paved and they want to keep it gravel at this point as it only serves employees of trust plant. Dan Kamp stated that they are preparing a plan for a dust treatment plan to address DRC concerns on that. Dan Kamp said dust control would be evaluated on a quarterly basis and they would use magnesium choride as needed . Dan Kamp said they are showing 33 parking spots and are only required to have 27. Fred said the water main should be farther off property line. Kamp said Fred is correct and it will be pulled over, this was just meant more as a conceptual design . Skelton said this initial week review, so at this point they have two more weeks to evaluate, but he asked if DRC or Kamp had any other general questions. Bud noted that they just allowed a 20 foot front yard setback for Joe Polus, which is what the applicant is asking for so he doesn ' t see a problem. Brawner said drop curb and sidewalk section with concrete apron should be shown . Skelton asked if signage was proposed . Kamp said just what is along the side of the building at this time. It was clarified that the building would be one level except for a minimal office space. p --- - -�- - `. Dan Figgins asked if there would be room for forklifts to drive / between the new retail and the road . Grigsby said it would be about 16 feet wide in there. Brawner said the exit will probably be to Broadway. Planner Grigsby said that drive isles are usually 26 feet, so he wondered if the the parking area needed to be that width as well . Skelton said they can go down to 24 feet for driveway. Brawner said he is struggling with the variety of uses in the back area, and the fact that the public will be back there, so he wonders if paving should be required there. Brawner said if that is the case, then he would like to see the whole parking area paved and 24 feet in width. Craig Brawner said they should restrict public access to the back area. Simkins said he thinks he will put a check out gate in the front and close off access to the back completely as far as the public is concerned . Skelton said he thinks that just some type of signage in the area would work to keep people out. ' Grigsby asked if a check out gate would block the access to all sides of the building for fire purposes. Dan Figgins said it depends on parking flow, and he felt that they had enough access points. Brawner said if there is access to the eastern area then it has to meet stapdards, but that could be handled through . conditions. Skelton asked if there was anything else that had to be addressed . Grigsby said they will need one more tree. Figgins said he prefers to see the building sprinkled , and he hates to see the water system not be looped . Tom Simkins stated that they won ' t be doing anymore fill in the floodplain . . . ` . . | [ RECEIVED BY aoiEMnr; CITY-COUNTY PLANNING, OFFICE � � • DATE 1`4 cl F r FW �s✓'" I� Y T r t >.. 4. .. W j90F FOpFr04 V 4 i WN r h�ONlltD 8, Veterans of Foreign Wars © VFW NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of pub.li.c meetings before the Development Review Committee at 10 : 00 A . M . on Tuesday, 22 September, 1992 and the Design Review Board at 4 : 00 P. M . on Tuesday, 22 September , 1992 :in the conference room of the Old Carnegie Library, 35 N. Bozeman Avenue , Bozeman , Montana , and public hearings to be held before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board at 7 : 00 P.M . , Tuesday, 6 October 1992 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall , 411 East Main Street , Bozeman , Montana, and a public hearing and public meeting before the Bozeman City Commission at 7 : 00 P.M . , Monday, 19 October 1992 ,. in t.ho meeting room of Bozeman City Hall for the review of a Conditional Use Permit Arnl .icat--ion F:nr Fa Omll:f;"%1r.;1.%I.:1= iit �`.i3ii.i �riCt.tir1.ng Planned Unit Development review requested by Westland Corporation , 124 North Wallace Avenue ,. Bozeman; Mon•t:ana, pursuant to Section 18 . 54 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance . The Conditional Use Permit 'appli.cation would allow the applicant to construct a new retail building , and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business that: .is Currently located on North Wallace , to the proposed new bui.Iding and site , thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site . The subject property is described as Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 16 , inclusive , in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman , Gallatin County, Montana, and an irregular shaped parcel of land containing approximately 3 . 98 acres- 'in the Northern Pacific .addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana , and more commonly known as the 300 Block of North Broadway. Said property is zoned "M-1 " ( Light Manufacturing ) District , and is approximately 8 . 5 acres . Oral testimony will not be taken before the Development Review Committee and Design Review Board . However , written testimony will be considered . Written comments shall be directed to the Planning Director and received by the Bozeman City-County Planning Office no later than 5 : 00 P. M. , Thursday, 1.7 September 1992 . Oral and written testimony will. be taken at the public hearings before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board and City Commission . Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Bozeman City-County Planning Office , 35 North Bozeman Avenue , 586-3321 , Ext . 227 . For more information , or for those who require accommodations for di.sabil'ities , contact the City-County Planning Office . Andrew C . Epple Planning Director 9` 00 �Q O J r s ` cnris DAV t 3 SVDjECT o PROPERTY o- A m I I t .1 s._ -'Fu.S.NQSI'AGF ; P.O. BOX 640 WNEMAN, MONT. 59715 .EP-1`92 :10?f _ .29 �-C P.R.M°TER 173/337e. ; Ethel C Collins p <. ,,, ,� — ©�O <r �? o yf 160 si--a""niesen .Road 'Rc1 t .Pr?c -N'T;9_71LtER ,-_— y y4� Q �`_� �� IN' �.��1�� £ S'��'�"'L.r "�Ej"it�3 :f E•1k� i••if'i•;..y _ �:.fr; NO FOR( R'cfif5�DN FILE L -4A5:'LE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDEF • � ,v .� � � .. . . ;= P�ORT�lA�i1t� ME`SS„AG FOR r, DATE ` '"►l q TIME C M OF- � 0 PHONE AREA CObE NUMBER EXTENSION Ti�, z"is� <), .' ."hFtw�"r�deb; ELEPHONED M14z ��� PL`EASEGALL ruizr GAME TO SEE YOU ti :WILLCALLfiAGAIN M' s WANTS TO SEE YOU y i t RUSH l", x r ^ �Rsk,t*rc:a .F�i• �a'��z.�`.��"��''"�° Ka szaf� 4tn�*s,�7 x��� �'-� � .�s . .�fiETURNEO YOUR'CALL���� n��'�� ESPECIAL i4TTENTION��`?'&�'' �' %, MESSAGE SIGNED LITHO IN U.S A. TOPS 3002-C • • r' t r ,, f i � J .. e t � i' t MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: DRC MEMBERS FROM: DAVID GRIGSBY, ASSISTANT PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 4 , 1992 RE: SIMKINS HALLIN, P.U. D. , APPLICATION #Z-92117 REVIEW ------------------------------------------------------------------- i Please find attached to your packets the plans for the formal Simkins Hallin P.U. D. application, #Z-92117 , for a new retail store on the 300 block of North Broadway. Written comments will be needed by the third week review, on Tuesday, September 22 , 1992 . Please also be advised that I will be wearing a hard-hat , safety goggles and a bullet proof vest, to ward off any repercussions from my recent "innovative" policy thinking ! i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY" GIV ;N of public meetings before the Development Review Committee at: 10 : 00 A. M . on Tuesday, 22 September, 1992 and the Design Review Board at 4 :'00 P. M . on Tuesday, 22 September, 1992 :in the conference room of the Old Carnegie Library, 35 N . Bozeman Avenue , Bozeman , Montana , and public hearings to be held before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board at 7 : 00 P.M . , Tuesday, 6 October 1992 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall. , 411 East Main Street , Bozeman, Montana, and a public hearing and pub_l.i.c meeting before tho Bo Pr111n City Commission at 7 : 00 P. M . , Monday , 19 October 19.92 , in the meeting room of Bozeman City Hall for the review of a Conditional Use Permit Application for a Commercial/Light Manufacturing Planned Unit Development -review requested ' bv Westland Corporation , 124 North Wallace Avenue , Bozeman , Montana, pursuant to Section 1.8 . 54 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance . The Conditional Use Permit application would allow the applicant to construct a new retail building , and to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business that is currently located on North Wallace , to the proposed new building and site , thereby consolidating all of their operations into a single site . The subject property is described as Lot 18 , Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27 , both inclusive , in Block 49 , Lots 1 through 8 , inclusive , in Block 46 , Lots 9 through 1.6 , inclusive , in Block 46 of the Norther. n Pac i f is Adfl i. t..ion to Bozeman , Gall O-. i.n C011711.y , Nonf.ana , �,nd ;In i r•..-e'4u1 n.r• tihn_i)ed na rr,f'] of 1 aild cont-a .i tri ng i approximately 3 . 98 acres i.n ti:u :�'01-1 tern .\ddi t.'ion to Bozeman , Gallatin County, Montana, and more comnlonl�' ;0JOW1'1 iAS (Alt-! 300 Block of North Broadway. Said property is zoned "M-1" ( Light • Manufacturing) District , and is approximately 8 . 5 acres . Oral te-stimony will not be taken before the Development Review Committee and Design Review Board . However , written testimony will be considered . Written comment-s shall. be d .i rer-.- ed to the Planning D'lj• ctor and '9r':,'t: ! =.'��'i, by the C. ty-County Pl ;,inning Off'xce 1'lll later than 5 : 00 P. M . , 1'i,i,r �: i;l 1, 7 Oral and written testimony will be taken at the public hearings before the Bozeman City-County Planning Board and City Commission. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Bozeman City-County Planning Office , 35 North Bozeman Avenue , 586-3321. , Fxt . 227 . For more information , or for, those who require c3c(-1Ar•)Ili 0rxa,j;.1nrlS for• disa.bi.liti.e.ti , r orlrac• c :; I Ci,0 _nun'ty Planning Office . Andrew C. .Epple Planning Director v i 4 rDa y,s SUBJECT o PROPERTY Q AL� i OTV OF BOZEMAN � ��E�"%qTT��S POS1'� E KO. BOX 640 ® � BOZEMAN, MONT. 59715 4�}��d.+e seP-� s2 .2 9 .`TAD po I �.,. v y.. B WETE.7 P. 1737337 R q/�Fo e[F4S MpN�,4tt?�► eov,S 4 U`AO�RFS3f Np 4cF NKgr0 ��S � Po'eUNo 'o'S" Opt'vo , A�DpF$8 � ep ACE ol,G Alb., F �P/,pF Mye� Virginia Biller [/NTh/SF o c Be1o'adex `�T 59714 re - i y8 NCH STREE? ` R-3 �\ —MH R-3 f \0- JUNIPER ST, t ---- --� �..s, rf) - -- --- �- — -- F�� (L' A S. R T _ pu ruTFt � ' ,TREET ' ra �0 ;t 1 W4 FRI _ y m v/ T -� X r aaVIS ' pAvlS ! i > 3' i o; } 711 low Z L �18NANY rP j Tjl ..---.._-. .rcl MAIN STREET . � � i � � � ��A*�¥�a�=f��t����»�m���f � $ ' / \ \ � \ � ¥ \ � � �� k R � \ � # ) . $ \ } \ } � � § \ % # $ � . « / w ,�m.� ��,/ � / \ ! , , � ) !\ j #�w�;���4�����«�-�%.���ƒ { z� a cc AtIMC f and o t Id 3nN3nrl t U t �� ��rd6 W� w' W' 0-1 3nN3nr 3:)V v� cr � I o � 1 3n 3 rH� • City of Bozeman 04844 Receipt Bozeman, Montana t 1 19 Received of � van AA(I U i I&' the sum of tAI:D� -�A n i ► �' (0 O Dollars for �� By _ • .� 3 _ z � � ._ 7,. Ayr. BO Z E MA N CITY—COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE CARNEGIE BUILDING - 35 NORTH BOZEMAN P. 0. BOX 640 , BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 (406 ) 586-3321 , EXT. 227 ( FAX #587-7785 ) CON D I T I ONA L U S E P E R M I T APPLICATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the Zone Code. -------------------------------------------I---------------------- 1 . Name and address of property owner: WS�LLIt� (,Q/ 12_4 V co:rW W AdJ Al' ft &:L -Phone:, 5405 2 . Name and address of applicant: Wl Phone: 3. Name and address of Engineer/Architect/Planner: _1✓lP gy,4Q Phone: -0cp� 4. Name of project/development: u, 0 5 . Address of proposed development: i; 6. Legal description: 7 . Current Zoning Land Area sq. ft. acres t. 8. Describe the pr osed dev lopme,t ( use additional sheets .if necessary: 1 ,L :p .Lli"" 9. Review Fee : $220. 00 (add $40 if property is within Historic Preservation, Conservation, or Entryway Overlay District, and complete and submit appropriate form) . This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and 15 copies of a completed site plan ( see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36" . Application deadline is 5 : 00 p.m. every Tuesday . This application must be signed by both the applicant and .property owner ( if different) before the submittal will be accepted . I (We) hereby certify that the above informatio is true and correct to the es of my (our) knowledge. Applicant' s Signature Property Owner' s Signature File No. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Applicant 6,up Cow. Residential PUD Project 151MI-Ik1S- Commercial PUD The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items stated for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked "NO" or "N/A" (not applicable ) must be. explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal , staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB) agendas, then subsequently reviewed by the Planning Board. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. 1 . DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS . The following information shall be presented in an 8 1 /2" X 11 " vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: YES NO N/A A . Application forms; B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the Planned Unit Development; C. Legal description of the site; D. Adjacent property owners ( 1 ) a copy of the list of the names and ✓ addresses of record of real property within 400 feet of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the Planned Unit Development is proposed, exclusive of public rights-of-way; / ( 2 ) the original list shall be included in y the document; (3) a listing of the names and addresses typed on mailing labels shall be submitted separately; 1 YES NO N/A E. A statement of planning objectives, including: ( 1 ) statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan (2) statement of proposed ownership of, public and private open space areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the Planned Unit Development (3) estimate of number of employees for business, commercial , and industrial uses (4 ) description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant / ( 5 ) the applicant shall submit as evidence V of successful completion of the applicable Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18 . 54. 100, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written expla- nation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section ; any variance from the criterion shall be described (6 ) detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated , / ( 7 ) statements of design methods to reduce V energy consumption, (e. g. - home/business utilities, transportation fuel , waste recycling) F. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the Planned Unit Development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be com- pleted, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; / G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan V and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8 1/2" X 11 " or 11 " X 17" size. 2 2. SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale of one ( 1 ) inch equals one hundred ( 100) feet, eighty (80) feet, sixty (60) feet, fifty (50) feet or forty (40 ) feet and composed of one or more sheets with an outer dimension of twenty-four by thirty-six (24 X 36 ) inches, showing the following information: YES NO N/A A. Name of project/development; B. Location of project/development by street V address; C. Location map, including area within one �. mile of site; D. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; E. Name and mailing address of engineer/ _V�_ architect; _ F. Date of plan preparation; G. North point indicator; H . Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; I . Listing of specific land uses being proposed; J . Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; K. Total number, type, and density per type of dwelling units; L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel ; M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size ( Floor Area Ratio, FAR) , with a breakdown by land use ; N. Proposed coverage of . buildings and structures for parcel (s) and total site, including the following the following: ( 1 ) percentage and square footage of building coverage (2 ) percentage and square footage of driveway and parking (3) percentage and square footage of public street right-of-way (4) percentage and square footage of open space and/or landscaped area (5 ) percentage and square footage of "active recreational .use" area O. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest, handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking, with typical dimensions of each; 3 YES NO N/A P. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; Q. Watercourses, water bodies and irrigation ditches; R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal V Insurance Rate Maps; S. Unique natural features, significant wild- life areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than two and one-half (2 1/2) inches by species; —� T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; U. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active recreational use / V . Location and acreage of common open areas y and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks, recreation areas, school sites, and similar uses; W. Location of existing and proposed pedes- trian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; X. Maximum building height of all structures; Z Y. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial , collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the develop- ment; notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included where appropriate; Z . Existing zoning ; AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of —AZ the Planned Unit Development, including materials and techniques used, such as screening , fences, walls , and other land- scaping; BB. Prposed signage, with locations and illustrative examples; CC. Adjacent site information Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200 feet of the proposal , exclusive of public right-of-way at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: / ( 1 ) land uses and location of principle V structures (2 ) densities of residential uses 4 YES NO N/A ( 3 ) existing trees and major features of V landscape (4) topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director (5 ) traffic circulation system 1� DD. Supplemental vicintiy map Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one ( 1 ) mile showing: ( 1 ) zoning districts ( 2 ) location of municipal boundary lines ( 3 ) traffic circulation system (4) major public facilities including schools, parks, trails, etc. EE. Attorney's or owner 's certification of ownership; FF . Chairperson and Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Board certification of approval of the site plan, including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18. 54 . 100 ; GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan; 3 . SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A. Architectural elevations Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; B. Landscape treatment A general. landscaping plan indicating : ( 1 ) treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces ( 2 ) all existing vegetation with identifi- cation of trees by sizes of species (3 ) specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction (4) the scale shown on plant materials C. Utility plans The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: ✓. ( 1 ) sanitary sewers (2 ) storm sewers (3) water (4) electric 5 YES NO N/A ( 5 ) gas (6 ) telephone lines ( 7 ) fire hydrants (8) trash collection areas D. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including the propsed width, treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed; E. Physiographic data, including the following: ( 1 ) a description of soils existing on the site , accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping ( 2 ) a map showing all permanent and V/ temporary streams and sketch showing the 100 year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City ( 3) a description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table fluctuations and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping F. Drainage plan Preliminary drainage report and calcula- tions and/or plan, including : ( 1 ) all watercourses on the property or which are located within ' 200 feet of the property , must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated ( 2 ) all drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways , reservoirs, etc. , which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated (3) all irrigation ditches, laterals, and IV structures shall be shown (4) all required on-site detention areas , including notes indicating the approximate area and volume .of the facility (5) all plans shall indicate the proposed V outlet for the storm drainage from the property, including the name of the drainage- way (where appropriate) , the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage- 6 ways, etc. ) , and any downstream restrictions YES NO N/A (6 ) existing and/or proposed grading plan G. Temporary facilities plan A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices and/ or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; H . Preliminary subdivision plat If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City 's Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; I . Traffic impact analysis At the discretion of the. Public Serviceu�� Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: ( 1 ) land use and trip generation - a table of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used (daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation (2 ) traffic graphics showing: (a) AM peak hour site traffic (b) PM peak hour site traffic (c) AM peak hour total traffic (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately ) (3) AM and PM capacity analysis An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial collector-collector and arterial-collector intersections within one mile of the site or as directed by the Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) trip generation - using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (b) trip distribution (c) traffic assignment (d) capacity analysis (e) evaluation (f) recommended access plan, including 7 access points, modifications and any mitigation techniques YES NO N/A (5 ) Additional Analysis Criteria Appropriate clearance intervals shall be pro- vided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at inter- sections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be four feet per second with a minimum "WALK" time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three through lanes in each direc- tion, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential inter- sections with signals will be placed on quarter mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service . Intersection Level of Service "C" shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service "D" be accepted for site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall operate at Level of Service "C" ; if Level of Service "E" is the result of the study, then alternatives of providing Level. of Service "D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally, the design year will be approxi- mately 15 years following construction. (6 ) Summary analysis explaining: (a) the proposed access points for the project, their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation ( b) future off-site road improvements for . access, which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is respons- ible for their completion (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets (d) how traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the Planned Unit Development (e) describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the development, if used 8 YES NO N/A J . Additional Studies and Plans The Planning and Zoning Board or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it .is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed Planned Unit Development; particularly if the development's compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; 4. REPRODUCIBLE COPY REQUIREMENTS In addition to the above document, Site Plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant shall submit the following for review purposes: A. One full size rolled (not folded ) mylar of all plans and renderings ; B. One 8 1 /2" X 11 " clear film reduction of all plans and renderings for reproduction and overhead projector use. * Reference to 18. 54. 060 "Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements" of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance ( 7/02/90) . 9 i I I 1 myu:�ns'.y.31 1 I i 1 a ' � I' T—LTNIIT L I NA I N.4,, P;2 Y S L.J E3 N/1 IT L.._ 1 1 1 , 1 I i 1 I f='QEPAQED BY D.J. KA�IMP 1 CIKAN ARCHITECTS, P.C. 1807 W. DICKERSON BOZEMAf�, MONTANA 59715 1 I 586-3624 1 1 A � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 M � 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages: ' INTENT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 3 - 4 ' APPLICATION FORMS 5 - 13 ' PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS BACKGROUND AND EXISTING INFORMATION ' Owners 14 Legal Description Gross Acreage ' Adjacent Property Owners 15-18 Nature of Interest in Development of the Property 18 ' Existing Land Uses Land Uses within 1/4 Mile 19 Topography Hydrology Traffic Descriptions Existing Recreation and Trails 20 Historic Resources Development Constraints Dust Control Fire Suppression 21 Improvements of Existing Infrastructure Deviations ' PLAN REDUCTIONS MAPS 24-28 ' PLANNING OBJECTIVES 31-33 COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA 34-38 DRAINAGE PLAN 39-40 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SIMKINS HALLIN ' A Planned Unit Development 1 PROLOGUE Simkins-Hallin Lumber is proposing an Industrial P.U.D. in the 300 block of North Broadway. The proposed site is currently part of the Simkins- Hallin's storage yard on approximately 8.5 acres, that is used not only for ' storage but also for the manufacture of trusses and the warehousing of building materials. It is the applicants' desire to relocate the offices and retail portion of their business that is currently located on North Wallace, to the ' proposed site. This would consolidate all of their operations into a single site, not only making the operations more efficient, but also relieving congestion ' and traffic conflicts on the current North Wallace site. INTENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT ' Described below is the intent of the development as reviewed in relation to the community design objectives of the Bozeman Zoning ' Ordinance and the Bozeman area Master Plan. A) To develop an industrial planned unit development in accordance ' with the goals, elements, objectives, and policies of the City of Bozeman's and Gallatin County's adopted Master Plan. As shown in a later section of this document, the Development shows a good example of the application of the ' Bozeman Area Master Plan and the performance standards of the Bozeman Zone Code. B) This project displays innovations in redevelopment in terms of its plan to mitigate the impact of an industrial use across the street from a residential use. Thus allowing for greater opportunities for better housing and employment as well as improving an existing situation on North Wallace that will benefit all the citizens of Bozeman. C. This project is intended to foster safe, efficient, and economic use of the land, transportation and the other public facilities in that the consolidation of the operations will greatly improve the efficiency of this operation, as well as ' improve the efficiency of the East end of Mendenhall when the current retail operations are removed from the North Wallace site. ' D. By proposing an extension and looping of the mainline of the water mainline, this project ensures adequate provision of public services not only for this project but for the adjacent neighbors. • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E. This project helps to avoid inappropriate development of lands in that ' it makes maximum use of an existing operation. At the same time, all drainage is retained on site according to city standards. i ' F. This project encourages a pattern of development which decreases automobile traffic and encourages trip consolidation. This is done by combining the two sites, and moving the two operations together reduces not only traffic within the business greatly, but should reduce traffic as it relates to customers of the business. G. Although the project does incorporate bike racks into the site design, it is somewhat questionable if a business of this nature could encourage use of bicycles or walking. ' H. P Through the consolidation of operations and a much more efficient operation in terms of location, the project greatly reduces energy ' consumption as it relates to vehicles. Also, since the operation will be moving into a new building built to todays higher energy standards, the operational demands will also be reduced. I. Although this articular site has no specialgeographical features, g P P through its incorporation of on-site water retention and a greatly enhanced landscape scheme, the project would have a very positive environmental impact. J. The proposed project greatly improves the design quality and character of the existing development through its use of extensive landscaping and ' screening. Currently, there is no landscaping on the site and this project would greatly buffer the existing site from the residences across the street. K. Although not currently actually a vacant property, the proposed site is used mainly as a storage yard. By developing this within this well developed area, this project effectively encourages development of vacant properties. ' L. The applicant feels that this project does in fact protect the existing neighborhood from harmful encroachment of incompatible development. Currently, the operations and storage have no buffer to the adjacent residential neighborhood, and this development will allow extensive buffering and a reduction in the visual conflict between the two uses. ' M. This project promotes a logical development pattern of industrial uses that will not only benefit a developer, the neighborhood, and the community ' as a whole, first through its reduction of impact on the adjacent neighborhood, but secondly through its relocation of its current retail sales .operation which it will impact the community as a whole. L � � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOZEMAN CITY—COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE CARNEGIE BUILDING - 35 NORTH BOZEMAN P. 0. BOX 640 , BOZEMAN , MONTANA 59715 ' (406 ) 586-3321 , EXT. 227 ( FAX #587-7785 ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning ' District, may , under certain circumstances , be acceptable . When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the Zone Code. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ' 1 . Name and address of property owner: WE"S^r1-tcW0 COE122LA_fkQk L 4 y caw W f (, w� Phone 2 . Name and address of applicant: :'_A' Me ' Phone : 3 . Name and address of Engineer/Architect/Planner : 1✓4n ' Q L] �rt� S ,_ �; Phone : k5? + -DS�Z�- 4. Name of project/development: _4 W-4Lis_q94,4• 0 5 . Address of proposed development : _ ,n(.� ' 6 . Legal description: 7 . Current Zoning ' Land Area sq . ft. F) G acres ' 8 . Describe the pr osed deve Iopment ( use additional sheets if necessary : -A G V-.I J_r 9 . Review Fee : $220. 00 ( add $40 if property is within Historic ' Preservation, Conservation , or Entryway Overlay District , and complete and submit appropriate form) . This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and 15 copies of a completed site plan ( see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36•• . Application deadline is 5 : 00 p.m. every Tuesday . This application must be signed by both the applicant and property owner ( if different) before the submittal will be accepted . ' I (We ) hereby certify that the above informatio is true and correct to the es of my (our) knowledge . Applicant' s Signature Property Owner ' s Signature • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 File No. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Applicant fiAm Residential PUD Project � ��� �� � Commercial PUD The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all ' Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items stated for the application to be considered complete . Any item ' checked "NO" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. ' Upon submittal , staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete . If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC ) and Design Review Board ( DRB) agendas, then subsequently reviewed by the Planning ' Board . Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. ' 1 . DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS The following information shall be presented in an S 1 /2" X 11 ' vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized ' in the following order : YES NO N/A ' ' A. Application forms ; ✓ B. A list of names of all general and limited y—/_ partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the Planned Unit Development; C. Legal description of the site; V D. Adjacent property owners ' ( 1 ) a copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400 feet of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the Planned Unit Development is proposed, exclusive of public rights-of-way; ( 2 ) the original list shall be included in ' the document; ( 3 ) a listing of the names and addresses typed on mailing labels shall be submitted ' separately ; 1 • • � i i i i 1 YES NO N/A E. A statement of planning objectives , including: ' ( 1 ) statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master ' Plan ✓' ( 2 ) statement of proposed ownership of , public and private open space areas and ' applicant' s intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the Planned Unit Development ' ( 3) estimate of number of employees for business, commercial , and industrial uses (4) description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant ' ( 5 ) the applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design Objectives and Criteria of ' Section 18. 54. 100, documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use; the applicant shall submit written expla- nation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require , or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described (6 ) detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated ( 7 ) statements of design methods to reduce --� energy consumption , (e. g. - home/business utilities, transportation fuel , waste recycling) F. A development schedule indicating the t✓ approximate date when construction of the Planned Unit Development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be com- pleted, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8 1/2" X 11 " or 11 " X 17" size. 2 • s � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 2 . SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale of one ( 1 ) inch equals ' one hundred ( 100 ) feet, eighty (80 ) feet, sixty (60) feet, fifty ( 50) feet or forty (40 ) feet and composed of one or more sheets with an outer dimension of twenty-four by ' thirty-six ( 24 X 36 ) inches , showing the following information : YES NO N/A ✓, A. Name of project/development; B. Location of project/development by street ' address ; C. Location map, including area within one mile of site ; D. Name and mailing address of developer/owner ; _% E . Name and mailing address of engineer/ �! architect; ✓ F. Date of plan preparation ; G. North point indicator; % H . Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; I . Listing of specific land uses being proposed ; `! J . Parcel size( s) in gross acres and square ✓ feet; ✓ K. Total number , type , and density per type of dwelling units; L . Total gross residential density and density ✓ per residential parcel ; M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ' ratio of floor area to lot size ( Floor Area Ratio, FAR) , with a breakdown by land use ; % N. Proposed coverage of buildings and l/ ' structures for parcel (s) and total site, including the following the following: ( 1 ) percentage and square footage of ' building coverage ( 2 ) percentage and square footage of driveway and parking ( 3 ) percentage and square footage of public ' street right-of-way (4 ) percentage and square footage of open U1.1, space and/or landscaped area ; ( 5 ) percentage and square footage of active recreational use" area 0. Number and location of off-street parking , V ' including guest, handicapped , bicycle and motorcycle parking , with typical dimensions of each ; 3 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 YES ,P. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals , � NO N/A unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; j Q. Watercourses, water bodies and irrigation V ditches; % R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal ' Insurance Rate Maps; ; S. Unique natural features, significant wild- life areas and vegetative cover, including ' existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than two and one-half ( 2 1/2 ) inches by species - T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; U. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active recreational use ' V. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses , including public parks , recreation areas , ' school sites , and similar. uses ; W. Location of existing and proposed pedes- trian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; ' X . Maximum building height of all structures ; Y. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial , collector and local ' streets, including off-street parking areas ; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the develop- ment; notations of proposed ownership , public or private , should be included where appropriate; Z . Existing zoning; ✓: ' AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the Planned Unit Development, including materials and techniques used, such as screening , fences , walls, ' and other land- scaping; BB. Prposed signage, with locations and illustrative examples; ' CC. Adjacent site information Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal . to include a survey of the area and uses within 200 feet of the proposal , exclusive of public right-of-way at the same scale as the proposal and including the following : ( 1 ) land uses and location of principle ✓ structures ✓- ( 2 ) densities of residential uses 4 • ♦ � 1 i � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 YES/ NO N/A (3 ) existing trees and major features of landscape (4) topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director ( 5 ) traffic circulation system v ' DD. Supplemental vicintiy map Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one ( 1 ) mile ' showing: ( 1 ) zoning districts ( 2 ) location of municipal boundary lines ' ( 3 ) traffic circulation system ( 4 ) major public facilities including 17 schools , parks , trails, etc. EE . Attorney' s or owner ' s certification of ownership; FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the Planning '✓ and Zoning Board certification of approval of ' the site plan , including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18. 54 . 100; GG. Owner certification of acceptance of / ' conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan ; ' 3 . SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A . Architectural elevations Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed ' improvements ; / B. Landscape treatment A general landscaping plan indicating : ( 1 ) treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces ( 2 ) all existing vegetation with identifi- cation of trees by sizes of species / ( 3 ) specific proposals to protect and ' preserve existing trees during and after construction (4) the scale shown on plant materials C. Utility plans The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: / ( 1 ) sanitary sewers (2 ) storm sewers (3 ) water �L (4) electric 5 • � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r r 1 YES NO N/A ( 5 ) gas ( 6 ) telephone lines ' ( 7 ) fire hydrants (8) trash collection areas , D. Street cross sections if different from ' City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including the propsed width , treatment of curbs and gutters , ' sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed ; ' E. Physiographic data, including the following: % ( 1 ) a description of soils existing on the site , accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended ' construction and proposed landscaping ( 2 ) a map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100 year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City ( 3 ) a description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table fluctuations and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and ' proposed landscaping F. Drainage plan Preliminary drainage report and calcula _LZ - ' tions and/or plan , including : ( 1 ) all watercourses on the property or which are located within 200 feet of the property, must be shown; in addition , the ' floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated ( 2 ) all drainageways, streets , arroyos , _LZ ' dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. , which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated ' ( 3 ) all irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown ` (4 ) all required on-site detention areas , including notes indicating . the approximate area and volume of the facility ( 5 ) all plans shall indicate the proposed ' outlet for the storm drainage from the property , including the name of the drainage- way (where appropriate) , the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage- 6 r � � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ways, etc. ) , and any downstream restrictions YES NO N/A (6 ) existing and/or proposed grading plan i ' G. Temporary facilities plan A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes , sales offices and/ ' or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; H . Preliminary subdivision plat 1 If the project involves or requires platting , a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; / I . Traffic impact analysis t/ At the discretion of the Public Service . Director a traffic impact analysis shall be ' prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, ' and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: ( 1 ) land use and trip generation - a table ' of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate , the trip rates used (daily and peak hour ) and resulting ' trip generation (2 ) traffic graphics showing : ( a) AM peak hour site traffic ( b) PM peak hour site traffic ' (c ) AM peak hour total traffic (d ) PM peak hour total traffic (e) total daily traffic (with site ' generated traffic shown separately ) ( 3 ) AM and PM capacity analysis An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial collector-collector and arterial-collector intersections within one mile of the site or as directed by the Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: ' ( a) trip generation - using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual ( b) trip distribution (c) traffic assignment (d ) capacity analysis (e) evaluation ' (f) recommended access plan , including • • � 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 access points , modifications and any mitigation techniques YES NO N/A ' ( 5 ) Additional Analysis Criteria Appropriate clearance intervals shall be pro- vided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian ' movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at inter- sections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be four feet per second with a minimum "WALK" time of seven seconds ; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three through lanes in each direc-tion, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount ' importance; consequently , all potential inter- sections with. signals will be placed on quarter mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. ' Intersection Level of Service "C" shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service "D" be accepted for t site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall operate at Level of Service "C" , if Level of Service 'E' is the result of the study, then alternatives of ' providing Level of Service "D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study ; generally , the design year will be approxi- mately 15 years following construction. ( 6 ) Summary analysis explaining: (a) the proposed access points for the project, their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation ( b) future off-site road improvements for access, which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is respons- ible for their completion (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets (d ) how traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the Planned Unit Development (e) describe bicycle and pedestrian ' pathways within the development, if used ' 8 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 YES NO N/A tJ . Additional Studies and Plans The Planning and Zoning Board or City Commission may require additional impact ' studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed Planned Unit Development; ' particularly if the development' s compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; ' 4 . REPRODUCIBLE COPY REQUIREMENTS In addition to the above document, Site ' Plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant. shall submit the following for review purposes : A. One full size rolled ( not folded ) mylar of All plans and renderings; B. One 8 1 /2" X 11 " clear film reduction of all plans and renderings for reproduction and overhead projector use . * Reference to 18. 54 .060 "Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements" of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance ( 7/02/90 ) . 1 1 9 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t BACKGROUND AND EXISTING INFORMATION ' Owners: The Westland Corporation ' President - Bob Simkins Vice President - Tom Simkins Directors: Same 1 Legal Description: ' Lot 18, Block 46 and Lots 16 through 27, both inclusive, in Block 49, Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman. Lots 1 through 8, inclusive, in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. Lots 9 ' through 16, inclusive, in Block 46 of the Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, Montana. An irregular shaped piece of land in the Northern Pacific Addition to the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, as ' follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 14, Block 41, Northern Pacific Addition to Bozeman, POINT OF BEGINNING; thence Northerly along the west bank of Mill Creek for a distance of approximately 445 feet to ' the south line of Lot 16, Block 46, Northern Pacific Addition; thence East along the said south line for a distance of approximately 54 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 16; thence north along the east line of said Block ' 46 for a distance of approximately 131 feet to the West Bank of Mill Creek; thence Northeasterly along the Westerly Bank of Mill Creek for a distance of approximately 366 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 18, Block 46, Northern ' Pacific Addition; thence North along the east line of McAdow Avenue in Bozeman, Montana, for a distance of approximately 466 feet to the northwest corner of lot 1, Block 47, Northern Pacific Addition; thence East along the north line of said Block 47 for a distance of approximately 358 feet to the westerly railroad right of way line of the Northern Pacific Railway Company, ' whose successor in interest is Burlington Northern, Inc.; thence Southwesterly along said railroad right of way for a distance of approximately 1,272 feet the North line of East Lamme Street in Bozeman, Montana; thence ' West along the North line for a distance of approximately 32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: containing 3.98 acres, more or less. Gross Acreage: Approximately 8.5 acres Ad.Jacent Property Owners: ' Montana Rail Link P. O. Box 8779 Missoula, MT 59807 1 Joseph Polus 5039 Love Lane ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Larry Willard ' 77 Chestnut Road Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Tracy R. Cowdrey 500 Kagy Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59715 ' G. E. Badgley Box 211 ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Clara B. Backman ' .303 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 tThomas J. & Linda A. Olenicki 7085 Nash Road ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Leslie D. Rykels ' 317 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 L. A. & Mary Fogle ' 319 Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Arthur I. & Lorene L. Cox 325 Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 Virginia C. Miller P. O. Box 5 Belgrade, MT 59714 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' Vernie C. Martilla 1127 Jackson Creek Road tBozeman, MT 59715 Ethel C. Collins 16080 Thiesen Road Belgrade, MT 59714 Carl Harold Godtland Boulder Creek Darby, MT 59829 ' Bruce McCulloch 210 Broadway ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Catherine Gnehm 411 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 ' John L. & Gloria Goerke 28457 Norris Road Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Charles R. Schleg er II P. O. Box 955 ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Laura C. Apperson ' 226 Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 ' John W. & Fae Rooksberry 420 N. 10th Avenue ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Martha Story Drysdale 1408 S. Black ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Valerie K. Silrum 206 Broadway Bozeman, MT .59715 1 Jeffrey D. & Margeret E. Cook ' 202 Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Willey R. Baker John A. Romito Richard F. Cromer ' 103 Blacktail Court Butte, MT 59701 ' John H. Prescott & Glenn A. Buss % Wiley Baker 103 Blacktail Court ' Butte, MT 59701 Dennis B. Trent ' 803 E. Davis Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Anne Barnaby P. O. Box 9286 Seattle, WA 98109 ' Jack Darham 310 N. Plum Street ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Richard S. & Lynn A. Browning ' 316 N. Plum Street Bozeman, MT 59715 ' J. Andrew Gleason (No Address Listed) ' Dallas & Norma Thompson 326 N. Plum Street ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Paul & Connie Vander Jagt ' Box 3448 Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Albert L. Harting, Jr. Box 4014 Bozeman, MT 59715 • � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � • John D. Goering ' 809 E. Fridley Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Vern & Verne Hancock 229 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Larry Gene Hancock 225 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 Spencer D. Daninick ' John Stuart 215 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 Wanda Lee Spain 221 W. Hayes ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Lawrence H. Otnes ' 205 N. Broadway Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Hazel Pearl Smith 201 N. Broadway ' Bozeman, MT 59715 ' Nature of Interest in Development of the Property To provide a contiguous operation for the Simkins-Hallin lumber ' operations. Currently the operation is fragmented between the proposed site where the manufacture of trusses and the majority of the ' storage of inventory is kept, and the existing retail store where some storage occurs and the offices and retail operations occur. It is the desire of Simkins-IIallin to combine their operations both for the ' efficiency of a single site, and for the reduction of the large amounts of traffic between the current retail site and the storage and manufacturing yard. It is also the desire of the owner to mitigate the ' current conflicts of traffic that occur at the present retail site near Mendenhall and Wallace. The current site has outgrown it's ability to function in it's current location. 1 1 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Existing Land Uses: ' Currently the property his zoned M1. The proposed use of the property is to stay within all perimeters of the.MI zone. No uses are proposed ' that are in conflict with the M1 zoning designation. Land Uses Within 1/4 Mile: ' Other land uses in the area include M1, M2 and R3 which lies across the street and to the south of the property. It is the desire of the ' applicant to mitigate as fully as possible the visual aspects of the parking and operations that will occur in that section that will be new construction. ' To o ra h . ' The proposed site for construction is basically flat with very slight slope from the southwest to the northeast as shown on the site plan. Hydrology, In reviewing well logs with the Department of Natural Resources, we ' find no records of wells within 400 feet of the property. All drainage will be retained on site and treated as shown on the drainage plan. the proposed structure will be a slab on grade and will not be affected by any ground water. There is an area of flood plain on the northeast side of the larger property, and this was addressed in the earlier site review for the truss manufacturing plant, and does not affect in any way the ' use of the site or the proposed new construction. Traffic Descriptions: The majority of traffic to the site is anticipated to come from Rouse Avenue turning onto Peach and proceeding around the curve of Broadway to the site. A smaller portion of the traffic will come from either Mendenhall or Main Street and come down.Broadway. It is ' further anticipated that virtually all of the truck traffic either delivering materials to the site, or making deliveries from the site to various job sites around the city will likewise take Broadway to Peach ' and Peach to Rouse. For additional traffic information, see the attached engineer's traffic study. � • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Existing Recreation and Trails: Currently there are no existing recreation or trail areas within the radius of the project. However, upon discussion with planning staff, it ' is proposed to eventually extend the Galligator Trail along the old railroad right-of-way which will run fairly near to the existing site. Although no formal discussions have occurred as of the time of this ' application, the applicant is willing to review the P.O.S.T. Committee's plans and cooperate in whatever way is practical. ' Historic Resources: This project does not impact any historic resources. See attached listing ' within 1 mile. Development Constrain ' The only development constraints to the site is currently the amount of flow of water within the city main lines as it relates to fire hydrant supply. The applicant has already done the main line extension on the very north end of the property to provide fire protection to the truss manufacturing warehouse. It is the request of the fire marshall for that ' line to be continued through the property and looped back to the main line on Broadway. Attached is a sheet that shows the proposed looping of the main line. It is our understanding that although this solution is ' not optimum for the capacities desired by the fire department, it is a major improvement for the area and would benefit not only this property, but also properties that are in the neighborhood of this site. ' Because of the looping of this line, they will experience improved fire flow should hydrants in the neighborhood need to be used for fighting fires wherever they should occur. ' Dust Control It is the intent of the applicant to.implement a dust control program which will monitor the dust levels on the site, whether they be created ' by wind or by vehicular traffic, and to monitor those conditions on a quarterly basis. As the dust begins to increase, the applicant will implement an application of a coating that will cause the dust to not become airborne. This will occur by the application of a solution ' approved for use by the EPA such as magnesium fluoride, and will be applied as necessary. • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fire Suppression ' It is the plan of the applicant to extend the mainline for additional hydrants to the site, as well as provide smoke detection systems in all ' of the buildings, including existing storage buildings as well as the proposed retail building. ' Improvements of Existing_Infrastructure It is the intent of the applicant to raise all manholes to a level which ' will be flush with adjacent grade. Deviations ' The onlydeviation being requested in the P.U.D. from the underlying g q zoning requirements is the reduction of the front yard setback by 5 feet. . ' The M1 zone calls for a 20 foot front yard setback which this submittal meets. However, the zone code also calls for any situation where two different uses adjoin that the yard setbacks of the less restrictive requirements meet those of more restrictive requirements in the adjacent zone. Therefore, this application would normally require a 25 foot front yard setback. Because of the limitations of the site and the ' requirements of the building size, the applicant has requested that the additional 5 feet be waived, and has mitigated this through extensive berming and landscaping to mitigate the impacts of cars being parked ' on the property. r � • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 low Im EMAN BO Individually Listed Properties on the National Register of Historic ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION Places that Fall Within the Vacinity Map of the Simkins Project: ADVISORY BOARD do Planning Dept. 1. Hamill Apartments (1931) 427 East Main Street ' P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59715 2• Litening Gas (1939) 424 East Main Street (406)586-3321 3. Spieth House (1903) 204 North Bozeman Avenue 4. Spieth House (1908) 209 East Lamme Street ' 5. Krueger House (c. 1880) 317 North Bozeman Avenue 6. Newman House (1890-91) 216 North Church Avenue ' 7. Busch .House (c. 1895) 224 North Church Avenue 8. Vreeland House (c. 1888) 323 North Church Avenue ' 9. Bohart House (c. 1889) 510 North Church Avenue 10. Peterson house (c. 1895) 216 North Wallace Avenue ' 11. MISCO Grain Elevator (1933) 700 North Wallace Avenue 12. Rouse House (1881) 506 East Babcock Street tHistoric Districts and Their Properties on the National Register of Historic Places that Fall Within the Vacinity 'Map 'of the Simkins ' Project• I ' 1. Main Street District: Bozeman Hotel (1890-91) 321 East Main Street ' 2. Brewery District: Edwin Lehrkind House (1912) 701 North Wallace Avenue Henry Lehrkind House (c.: 1908) 707 North Wallace Avenue Julius Lehrkind House (1898) 719 North Wallace Avenue ' Lehrkind Bottling Plant (1925) 802 North Wallace Avenue Bozeman Brewery (1895) 803 North Wallace Avenue ' B. Derek Strahn Historic Preservation Officer • � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fi -- lu 04 1 _ � •. 1 `�' � S t'\ _ f�� r cep" t .-- Stree ot 1 8cb��,ck cw M 1 e St, ; m 1 1 1 1+��•Y.'��,*"^• ,--►T'-a�,�!ro-!!c�v9�yrrrp'P�r a�R'4�+ic.,c�- �. .. ,. r. ,:�...-:-.,... -- - ••5• .i w .F. • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { UD \ � o ED f i it � ''•�� ---I- =-m?--._... P * ..�+ (.)fll e t5 � fll I ' / =_;=_ IIIIII II II II II II '�'� e �/ •�\ 000mmsm %o _ I \\ eo FMPLEY 00 Fit> u g:,() % / \\�� o comma mmamm mm ammmm mn mm .[.:a m -�------ 'e I I \mN J D ------------ ------ l"O I e I I I N \ / 40 �c j� rs i y v 0 "�.Ih�/` I\I h� ICNITECTS, P.C. 1807 W. DICKE2SON, BOZEMAN, MONTA,N,y. 8r•—w�� 1 ��. f _ I I 55 6 :g I'd n COMPUTER/ 5 ST ORAGE -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- LU ILJT***Tlr-r IDDIEN/1 E_,l_.,C)lP1N41E Ts-Tr-]r- C-1 I< Q_,C 4 T E C T S, P.C. IS07 W. [DlC<E2SON, BCD=EM,,n,,N, MONTAN,& S 2:*,.6 4 i (Nz kit V) - A w,(f,),- U) IlIm z U 'r"VI 0'AU 7- N Ali �,O,'J 0 LO-160PT > 51 > 02 0 ur- i-ILI : �"*.. -1 n_ Itfln tl 0 In, 0.-7j, 0 1 Y, jy L,i-N- 103 TVA IP Ill'In' (m M, WGil -vi T 00 q, 0 0 -u > rn -OR -- F V11 b -A -.1 r I a,,�-1 11 b-n fi znlC) Zr U) q - 9Z-u Z ni (A U3 U) X It LT,U, 1i T Zy- kit 5 (p 5cli mw (p ri) mm 'A Inl lj k) A it r A K 0 x In kj UN 6 lit 0 3,IP N 1711 F7 J oo p INS, m ON.1, No q (p n, in 7n IN, A- pV J> N! I I I I-Irl 3;; i / I M T F 1 Ill W 6 A i"Al o (p 7K ------— qNOW 'T 3: J1 0 X U, 2u JIM 1 ..d Cl</-\N AQ>C"ITEECTS, P.C. 1807 W. C)IC<E=-I;Z>SC)N, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 566-3624 s • o its a I wo a ' °o is•A� Fil E a ti I --� 1 V L I l l\\\` \\\ � ❑ ni 17 El --------------- 10 c 2 J 7 / J i a � \\ '0�;, � / \� ❑ III — [[ f1t I I o j j =_ _ Ell RtD \ 1 n� �lUl FRIDLEY — i yd 1 i i \ ❑ 0 ------ ----- I W \ \ tl� ------------------- - , _U- 1 r O T- I I 2i1r=.i\1 ALJZ -- -;ITECTS, P.C. 1807 W. DIC<F=QSON, BOZ MIAN, MIONTAN/ ��_':�,- =•<,�•--I- L • • I • II 'J ' ' i Wi i1Y Lip Ll U ,�.% Gallatin County, Momana is I r of .� Poil Otiicn I,, `� � Elenl.nlory SCf1YU1 I, , i Hip ScnoYl I I \\/ !Al Courl HOJSD I•r I''! SITES FOR R IEG 10W-6, I(E C D . I V EAST _ -1 mULT1 , RPos� a kLLATIN REC 4EATJON ! ' AREA 1 �.�PA Loriffin -= 1 ")1•� I{ ! I I •��� ,I� .._..1 TYf11y YCh 'L � II � �� ii L � � 1 •�nlJ(J(-1111' �II 71::iI�S1-1 _ � ' IA �Ir'u u1�f II.JI, 7�v �r11, I � ^•4�.�1 I:.I� I � -� )) .._ I ... � t`1CI�Ir1(-if-_af11.: JI.I�. r-Ir. �,��11-1rJ(; I l �:-,. -- I � � � � i � __,,. I � � �n��r,-,-,:o,;l,:;�•f.� I( r I_. l(C�-1.11=1�:U� _ ,c _II_Illl,l l� II I (L _._I"—M9�n_SI. '� I ---► - P. = - l..r. Itil - II' --------I+I- 1'..� I�lf_ ./_.J/I �A'L�(./u �—`.'i+�C_.` ,`uY-ru_ ❑rn_Inl-,ln�r1lCrn_-lInCl�al�urcG'1Il.(l J IIrin�IlIrrr-! lhipp c4lIfr-. _.1I I LC ifir J ILr 11f -inn h -clGnni-ir . .�I� hl l 1�_ f 1.� 1�i�.y.4�. ;, •, _-- 1' _ d _- -- + L �i.�i..l �:'I. _� —. '�'+ — '.`.,�Ir-.. MYnlmu I ILJCJiInr,'�• I I .,..._ flu. �f I'. I -._ . ' -- -- 11nn0 ' r� u{ l.ulc Un i ItY. SlYla , unlF - !-.:__ i t_.. _ _ - I ��•�, •-� 11 u: I I _ 1 � � 1•, Unlwralty n . .�•.-•= �.:.__.,-- - -�� '; � � _ _�� �.,;,, I- ���� I i_l� ,1, 11 I I( ' rl... lL-11 ------ [I u L �..� I JI I I.JIJenel D,n Hu. ^. 11 •If + I i `I lI --_-------- -- ----.-�l__IL_.__`—--.�^--TO--NA710NA fORES7 UOUNDAI'IY !!� i� II 1� 4II } tl( 4 I I • • Rocky Mountain Engineers Civil Engineering & Land Surveying ' P.O. Box 883, Bozeman,Montana 59771 (406) 586-4859 September 1 , 1992 ' Mr. Dan Kamp r Cikan Architects 1805 W. Dickerson ' Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Fire Flows Adjacent to Simkins-Hallin New Store ' Broadway & Fridley Dear Dan, ' I have reviewed the availability of fire flows adjacent to the new Simkins-Hallin store at .North Broadway and Fridley Street. If a new fire hydrant is constructed approximately 300 feet east of the new new store on ' Fridley Street, the head loss due to a fire flow of 500 GPM at this hydrant would be 5 feet, or 2.2 psi. Looping the water line between North Broadway and Front Street would provide another direction for water to flow to the ' hydrant and increase the reliability of the flows to the hydrant. Looping the water line further to the south would not give any increased reliability however. ' Please call if you should have any questions concerning our review. ' Best Regards, Ray-H. Center, P.E. , L.S. t 1 • • � ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • X J$7.��i9LL/IJ LL.v C—/�• sr�-n QVI Z. 1 � 4Pvw �- —r d ti 31 c, L 0 v�v i --- L.vS S Ti�'iw uG M ^' 1't7p � O.�' Co � t).1, . �'/✓'�-Y G i ✓c �i1 Z Z l`z'v cal • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PLANNING OBJECTIVES ' Master Plan Statement The Site Plan submitted for the Simkin-Hallin planned unit development ' has taken into account all of the criteria supplied within the background information and provided a workable solution to the various conditions of the site and at the same time provided a creative project that is responsive to the new Bozeman area Master Plan and Zoning Code as listed below. ' 1: There are a number of specific goals of the Master Plan that were taken into account in the planning of this project: A. ENVIRONMENT, AESTHETICS, AND NATURAL RESOURCES ' foal 8. Promote and stimulate the development of businesses that compliment our community's goals, exemplify a creativity in construction design to compliment the surrounding land and beauty of the 1 area, and that encourage a strong business-community relationship through creative building and landscape design. This project not only will promote and stimulate the material supply business of Simkins-Hallin, but at' the same time will consolidate their operations into a much more efficient operation, thus reducing traffic and at the same time will do it in a way that the new retail store through creative landscape design, buffers the parking and circulation to the building from the residences across the street. ' B. ENERGY AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION ' Goal 1 Encourage innovative development to be designed for maximum use of alternative energy resources and to conserve energy, and other resources. ' Through the consolidation of the two site currently used by Simkins-Hallin, the traffic between sites will be greatly reduced and the efficiency of the operations greatly increased. • • � t F. COMMERCIAL,INDUSTRIAL,AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ' Goal 1. Maintain and strengthen the central business district as a commercial, cultural, and symbolic center for the Bozeman area. By moving the current Simkins-Hallin retain and storage area on Wallace Avenue, to the new site on Broadway, the potential for other business operations to occur within that area is improved through the ' removal of current traffic conflicts at the existing yard. Goal4. Encourage improvement of the appearance of existing ' designated industrial areas and encourage infilling of designated industrial areas. 1 The moving of the retail sales of Simkins-Hallin will satisfy both parts of these goals, first by improving the appearance of the existing industrial area as it relates to the residences across the street, and secondly by infilling another use onto the site that better functions within the M1 zone of the proposed site rather than the existing retail store that functions more in a commercial setting. ' Goal5. EncourageP economic development associations to promote the expansion of existing businesses and the location of new businesses that will provide a variety of industrial and commercial activities, providing they are harmonious with our natural environment. ' This planned unit development will promote the expansion of an existing business, and allow it to function in a way that not only encourages the growth potential of that particular business, but also improves the relationship of that business with the community as a whole. ' 2: Statement of Proposed Ownership of Open Space: Since this is an industrial planned unit development, no open space is ' proposed within this project. However, it is the intent of the owner to accommodate in any way practical this project's relationship to the future Galligator Trail when it is finally determined how it would physically relate ' to this particular property. 3: Estimated Number of Employees: Currently, the average number of employees in the employ of Simkins- Hallin is approximately 30. This includes 5-7 people within the Truss ' Manufacturing Plant, 12 people within the retail store and offices, and the balance of employees working either in the storage yards or in the delivery portion of the business. • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4: Services: ' All services currently* are adjacent to the site, and as previously stated, the J P Y water system will be looped from Front Street through the site and connect back to Fridley Street. 5: Description of Rational Behind Assumptions: It is the belief of the applicant that b consolidating the two sites into one not PP Y g only will the traffic pattern of the operation improve greatly, but it will also mitigate current location problems at the existing retail site. It is the belief of the applicant that not only will the operation be more efficient and use less ' energy, but that the current existing site will be better suited for a use that is more commercial in nature, and less industrial in nature. This will encourage additional commercial growth within the east end of Mendenhall. 1 ' COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA 1 ALL DEVELOPMENT: Neighborhood Compatibility: ' 1. The development is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and adjacent neighborhood. In terms of it's buffering of parking and circulation areas and it's consistency in terms of massing of ' buildings and scale of buildings in relation to other buildings within this particular M1 district. ' 2. The project will be the final element within the total site of the operations, and therefore should not have a significant adverse effect on the adjacent surrounding development in that there is no further development ' to cause additional traffic generation. 3. The project has been reviewed as a concept plan by the DRC as well as tthe DRB, and ,the applicant has made every effort to incorporate those recommendations. ' 4. The project is in accordance with the adopted elements of the Bozeman area master plan listed in a previous section. ' Public Facilities Services and Transportation: 5. The development complies with all city design standards, with the ' exception of the amount of fire flow to the area as provided by the city water mains. This concern has been mitigated to the fullest extent by the applicant ' and as stated by the fire marshall mitigates this concern as much as is realistic. 6. The sewage generated by the development will not exceed the sanitary ' sewer system's line and treatment capacity as very little sewer will be generated by the use. ' 7. As previously stated, adequate water supply will exist to serve the development once the completed loop of the fire hydrants is completed from Front Street to Fridley. ' 8. An adequate electrical service exists. 1 • � � t ' 9. Based on the traffic figures supplied in the traffic analysis, the City Transportation plan will be capable of handling the traffic generated by the ' development. 10. Adequate emergency access is provided as reviewed by the DRC. 11. Adequate lighting for vehicular use areas and exterior building areas will be provided as security lighting. NATURAL RESOURCES: ' 12. There are no irrigation channels, stream channels or other water bodies associated with the property. Previous attention has been given to the floodplain that exists on the northeast corner of the property and have ' satisfied the city's review process. 13. There are no known natural or geological hazards on the site. ' 14. The portion of the site that will see construction, has no natural vegetation at this time and is currently a storage yard. ' 15. Being a light manufacturingarea, there is no existing wildlife habitat or g food services to be preserved. ' 16. The project historicalj roect is not located within a designated proposed g district, nor does it include a designated landmark structure and is therefore ' in conformance with the city's historic preservation ordinance. Attached is a list of historic buildings and districts within the 1 mile radius. ' 17. The development is not proposed on existing agricultural land or open space. ' Environmental Standards: ' 18. The project will conform to applicable air quality standards. 19. The project will conform to all applicable local, state and federal water ' quality standards including erosion and sedimentation and run-off control. 20. There are no expected activities which will cause noise generation that ' exceeds minimum performance levels of the City Ordinances. 21. Not applicable. The proposed project is anticipated to produce no ' glare, heat or direct or reflective light problems. 22. Not applicable. The project should cause no vibration. • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 r • • r 23. Lighting design as proposed will be such that there will be no site r lighting that will cause glare to adjacent properties or streets._ See lighting detail for additional information. ' 24. All sewage will be treated and disposed of within the city system. SITE DESIGN: ' 25. The elements of the site design are arranged on the site so that the activities within the site do integrate with the organizational scheme of the ' neighborhood. This is shown in the relationship of the accesses to Fridley Street and the buffering that occurs with the parking between Broadway and the building. ' 26. The elements of the site plan are designed and arranged to produce a P functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development. ' 27. Since the existingsite is basically flat in topography, has no natural Y water bodies or water courses, or existing vegetation, this criteria does not ' apply. 28. By combining the two sites, the design and arrangement of elements ron the site plan will contribute to an overall reduction of energy use by the applicant. ' 29. Not Applicable. There will be no residences within this project. 30. The design and arrangement of landscaping and buildings do ' contribute to an increase in the ascetic quality of the site configuration. This portion requiring 30% open space is not applicable in this M1 designation. 31. The parking design provides for a smooth and safe movement of vehicles both on and off the site. r32. The development satisfies the parking requirements of the City and provides adequate space for loading and unloading of persons, materials, and goods. 33. Not applicable. There is not an active recreational area supplied in the MI zoning. 34. The pedestrian circulation system is designed to adequately ensure that r pedestrians can move safely and easily between the retail building and to and from their vehicles. 1 r . • • � 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 ' 35. The development is being developed in a manner consistent with the circulation patterns of the adjacent neighborhood. 1 36. The pedestrian circulation does incorporate design features to allow for handicapped accessibility, and a safe movement from vehicle to retail outlet. ' 37. The pedestrian sidewalks, at such time is required by the City, will connect with the adjacent properties and have been planned for. ' 38. The landscape plan does enhance the appearance of the parking area as it relates to the residential uses across the street and will contribute to their views of the property. 39. The landscape plan does enhance the view of the proposed building from the adjacent street and residential areas. 40. The landscape plan screens parking areas from the adjacent roadway, ' pedestrian area and public view. 41. The development is not adjacent to a public park or open space. ' 42. All signs within the project will be in compliance with provisions of g p J P the Bozeman Sign Code. ' INDUSTRIAL: ' 1. All necessary precautions have been and will be taken to prevent lubricants, hazardous materials and fuel oil substances from leaking into the groundwater system. 2. No repair, painting or body work activities will occur on the site. 3. The project is located adjacent to a collector that provides adequate access to the site. ' 4. The project is developed such that the least intense uses are located along the collector street, and the more intense uses such as the truss manufacturing plant and warehousing activities are for the most part located away from the collector street. 5. The project utilizes a landscaping theme that will tie to the Polus property to the north, as well as incorporating provisions for future sidewalks that will tie to the Polus property as well. ' 6. The project is being developed on land that is substantially surrounded by developed property and has existing services and utilities already available. � • � i � 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' MITIGATION OF LAND USE CONFLICTS ' The land use conflicts that occur between the proposed retail store and the residential uses across the street are being mitigated through extensive landscaping between Broadway and the parking area. This function is not ' only to screen the building, but also the parking area from the properties across the street. The incorporation of a 4-foot retaining wall with earth bermed to the top of the wall and covered with vegetation serves to screen ' the cars from view and to limit the amount of activity seen from the residential side of the street. ' STATEMENTS OF METHOD TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION ' By combining the two existing sites of Simkins-Hallin into one singular site, great reductions in energy consumption can be realized. The reduction of vehicular and forklift traffic between sites will be removed altogether, as well ' as the use of a new building with current energy standards applied in its construction will greatly reduce the energy used within the overall operation. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE ' The intent of the owner is to begin construction in October, with completion of the building.to occur within 120 days. Additionally, the completion of the paving and landscape will occur as quickly as weather in the Spring permits. ' All improvements will occur within this initial construction phase. 1 I • � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DRAINAGE PLAN ' ��/�-'.�KN1S__�/^^ L(-/wJ �C.IJ•rl.aCs�'.. �rd � .. t 5�2�--� ��/tea/•/.�4c �t.:.G�.. JIJ j)[.� 7cc�;C_r-� �L� / �� (�„� GLl t-✓f'+�2,/ ./G��"J.../.T7 ti �- v�v /, G ✓mac v.1 (:� Z ` = L .'!� 0. 9 ( ._ �� > z. c) e j. `;�.$' T(1,.L.,� �'._.,�/�u F� /v % Ski i•�-+^1..... .:......_.........._: r • •'.:-car'`_: � �- 1 C = 4D. z yg..?z/....._.... . . . ,.- 1 . . ' /�:�^.=wJT�.�� Y V C", � .l_1_✓�!_J��J.J -- /YjSi i1 rt� �; �..us l U-�i� J7-z-,.JS/Tr Uri,✓-�"�oAJ j/.JG ` J�(ii�uFj� /� .rNufj� j:� .NUl7j ✓JL[/v .c= 3 o.32 Bp 7/ 74 3s-7 • • � II 1 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ./—oLi 1-0J+l� 'JF /J' �%Z_ri/'7�J..J �Z�fJ �i)i.._.: �:/�L :: Y y�;.. i,:.^•'%� ' ��•r�'1� Gu�.-1-�r LJ i�T>H. OF ,c't-u r' i=JiL U C./,H:�C�c)c.J c.7/"= Gl. �% �.��: (/-/iJ%�� i�c /"?,mac./tJ�Fj= /• Gi'SS'��ii �•i psi/L / Q G =• ST l 3�t ' L 0, c.-q.S.P / 7 1 i • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 ' , �_- - _ _ � • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �' 1 1 1 1 II I1 L'1 • • � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 O p p p © O O ,o GE TI F I GATE OF OWNS.: SH I P, (� - (�) PLANN I NCB D I SG TOR 9 APT" : OVAL L0 __ — TL o .dab o rtk's" sHorur� t.0 Srm�DAreD cce�Tr :�� ?� G G E P T �. N G E OP G O N 1� i 7 I O N S pr` I t�z axrErz rL:Aw• \'. l9 FEET OFF 1-bP1rH SLOE of _ Q�yeu e % I o 0 0rx \ Fr"�of� �a�a°r Tyr OF- J (1�1 - Ixcaa^^cra,ercrar 1 _ LAND5GAPE LECSENM i' /r . V e,. .. ` '�'L ' PA-..ORE ASS+ ..1 ,.. 3 FRAklvus PE Vs LVAN GA RxN,:s a ) __ rl c'�f _tiai *� _ i lydgJ z"'e GRIP. 'l 'AKIN&ASPEN Q POPvLJ5'¢_'✓UL 4G n OIDE I - _ L E kTEQ!OQ L.i G..TING 0)0 i'I - TCTAL`/OWTINb MG-bY- A �o m c me h59NAK fF�♦-0Y.K LANI;�5CAFE P®I N75 MINIMUM SIDEYARD EXCEEDED BY 10': 5 P-S. -- 1 °I mH � f r ADDITIONAL SIDEYARD PLANTINGS: 10 PTS, 1I "r`to 99 r FRONT YARD 5 PTS. j 1 ti� O SIDE YARD: 5 PTS. I I - • ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR 7. �a RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: -P --- *, 3 ARKING LOT LANDSCAPING: 10 5. �.Aosr m I I TOTAL POINTS= 33 f''rS. e� POINTS REQUIRED: 23 '11-S._ POINTS BEYOND REQUIRED+ CU R,5 SETA I L5 _ -F aul -- u JE:)11� 7 �,GLPB.VA 6UfTER DRAI4 3 GONG.PIMMYN PARKINS GUI •J LONG.PARKING GR_%....�— 1 \ --._ LOT 16,BLOCK 46 AND LOTS 16-2-7,BLOCK 44, LOTS I-6,BLOCK 46,L075 9-16,BLOCK 46 OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC ADDITION TO BOZEMAN,MT. • — p n-' AN IRREGULAR PII2G2 OF LAND IN THE NORTHERN PAGIPIG ADDITION A5 DESGR'BED IN THB P.U.D.SUBMITTAL /� BOOKLETTHIS TO TS PROJECT. YARD LIGH 5I TE 5TATI 5TI G5: AN G A L L A T I N G C'U N T Y M O N T A N A 1507 K DICKER50N EOZcMAN, MONTANA 5g715 q OANE�S: AESTLAND CORPORATION PERIMETER L.AND5GAPE AREAS: (2196) ,6286 SQ.FT. LNG�N��f��J' �®G�.� �®Ui''1 I I� LNGIN���S �`- C/O SIMKIN5-HALLIN LIMBER,124 NO.WALLACE,BOZEMAN,MONTANA PARKING LANDSCAPED AREA: (4%) I I lq SQ.FT. PROPOSED LAND USE: LIGHT MANUFACTURING, BUI!_-.DINCS MATERIAL SALES TOTAL LANDSGAF=D AREAS, (251%) 7�05 SQ.i-T. 6oQ W. MENDENH4 coz_MAN, MONT,4N 59'115 ZONED: M-1 LAND USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ARE D A FOR PARKING a RIVF-5: (36%) 111�46 50,FT. 57 E7 �������' 5®G :�LOGK ®F N®.57OA1 *N *'T' R�EVIEAED AND APPROVED BY: GAS,!MAN NURSERY E � f TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE: (3q,o) i180b SQ.FT. — FINAL SUBMITTAL: SEPT I, I1ig2 TOTAL SITE AfMA: (100%) 3035Q SOFT. � � �� � �� I I� " PERMITS REQUIRED: BUILDING � ., r w FLOOR TO AREA RATIO: 3q � �J� PA4�4<IN6 STATISTICS: S�U�1-IG aTBEET �.®.W.o: O°'o MAXIMUM =3LDG. HF-16HT: 40, O� f I ��� _ I OFF-STREET: 55 BUILT�ING SQUARE �OOTA6E: r ° ,�4CTIVI= 11-"EOF�EAT�ON AREA: N�A MAIN LEVEL: IZ05 S.F. CSALES,10272 SF..OFFICES; 1536 S.F,1 ' , �I ,;�`� <t 1A TOTAL: 33 UPPER LEVEL: A20 5.F. - REVIEWED&COND�d'IONALLY APPROVED � 1 (REauIRED BY CODE:11) TOTAL: 13'f2b 5-F. BOZENIAIQ CITY-COALI PLANNING --�I x /!B oB -5TFT = Z- G DEPAR7�NT 4DIIWMM DATB - I C� p 0 0 0 0 o 'O C 1 !7 TER \'a^vT ` ` . I 5 GAS LINE I' - ! I CITY STI✓�NDARD C:&B CUT •'� -.. _ -._- ;.- .--- �- /. % II \ C' RB "UT AND `"IL9ENIALK O O O O •,:•�ems,-.-.,a�.w.�ae�,:,�„w � H7EKbi:� FEO,.iFED. (TYP.) r _ i IDEN LY i I 1iLl-j a. r � 24-0. ---- xA CRASS - WASF� CRASS WA'�-ED 1 CPE Y i " _ z g t GRAVEL q' !; - 1 GRAVEL 24 �^Z•/.I I. MINE s r sII hN . i a.o ;. -;._ ,.,.: -`":�. a: �•ETBA�{j{pryyj��- ,._ Pt WCOIrAETE ----- __-- ------..._.-. _ i u RETANNr6 WALL it ' I $ DROP CL2B F012_ \ ` Ari Y-_RYi`CELJ > THS _I-I C. AOCE65ACBhBY 4 TY�CAL) c.,rw PA I ( - R ISED IDIFNAi.. -- _..fi T i , / f G'".ASS m-o. .o - y - _ a......._.....-- PAVED J GRAVELLED rn i P F o s c NORTH lo` I GRass , .� I — QETENSION I ` POND ENGINEER'S �I REPCRT AND DRAWINGS -OR d DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS i\ ..._.._.....---- ---- ------ O O [71 .. f ' c NOTES: rEE SPECIFI ON DRAINAGE AND RETENFON. I a;i ENG'NEE GRADING AND D NAGE LAN. i . _ j II ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO BE IRR'GgTED BY I 1 ! UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. i � e v �--- I � w _ ------ c\:'LOSU:2E �S 3 t\OT C. !u I > > (f1 (NOT A i LJJN 'JIILL i u iti ^41/_lIAY) 1 Q Q > DRIVEWAY) J� , F XI�S AaPL•CA\T STiNG ON SIT= TRASH - I t1 • �- !y � !� L L i f / "� J ir I. 91� �RIDL.EY -- -- -- ---- -- -- o o © © o Q q o © © © a o o _..- --------- I- CRITICAL VI ,'15eq SITE �^' � 'ir •\'�I� R ivI-1FROIi REINCROSS STREET R-3 �,'� Z/;NGE / PaV: oN �`� f PROPOSED/ a M-1J1( \l— e °®a •e aim T p % \L � EM � �. —� I '! '� 5 +ppmved o mplience THS IXISTPJO S=CTION TO w � 5 IOI°+'61✓ + I ` .. -.._._..._ _L.c.,nsc.e!�cw..eu"ezm as PAVC-Ds!re._ 1 ... .. ._-._.-I._v...! .. .... .......... .m.. ...._ \ .__. _...,.... _. i ti � _.. n tt RM DRAIN t OMH AMERICAN I A%71 _ 6 � 1 s, � OARAGEpETSp DRAWING I 1J I� III II I ,i r •! / r j 60R SITE SPEC IIE I I II I hI 1 \^ osroRAGE f o II II t'� e I I mo ❑ °�� >�1.-� '� !I I i I I ;< r fir! I� 1 e I o' rj III III I I I I,II 4 oomot 4F`1 m I_U AARQNG 50 UTILITY EA5Et,*ENT T `` RT'4L _ -- - •.. j �, � � e G(ZEII, ArE f I 1 \•'\.. ,/ � 0 TRAFFIC LANES A i M�/ �U ,,k ...,\ I,✓ / n—n I ~ ` �. o �� 0;1� o � �,� %i���// � 'vim / �•� +�i � �LI .J i r 9 SE✓iER 1 �-J Vr� Ir I \.. /{ ItI-2 r 1.,/: �;.' I •�•� /�� //..i SCALE I" - 60'- O„ TOTAL SIZE: \ \\ % / —�� -- /% 8.5 ACRES+/- U I 1111-1 j, � � RAILROAD/ LRo I -- ,. \��- � SPUR � U alit 1 1/7 To NO 5GALE !::VY.I!��SITE2 1!/1 2/92 16`22 F� [r, U b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 { SIMKINS- HALLIN !UMBER CO. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN �a ,o 2 Ce nma fin'.T \\ � ,�o�s sosux \\ `'0 1 �•'2 I C., '� 9rs N •� j I • a4.7 B F1-91.3 j j j I EIDSn�G ELEVATION I I I A4.0 Ie—EXISTING CONTOUR PROTaCISEO ELEVATION I r)8 x Z I I xR5.2 SIDEWALK A:.2 x ..•.�,. �'2•;•x X ` xFL=8�..f5 v - z DO '847 1 CD a u 31.E aewm 3/4'aide J,.t .. I I I . N I I I I DEPRESS C1 1 AT LOW PC1 CUTLET STRUCTURE S�� � E1•E C �— t�4y 3/4-WIDE SLOT.VERTICALLY E PROPOSED BUILDIIVG W \ I IN 15 I.D.RCP OUTLET STRUCTURE. OUTLET STRUCTURE: - I •� g �I �� 15'I.D.RCP SET A MINIMUM OF W BELOW GRADE STCRM WATER DETENTION r (WASHED AGGREGATE SURFACE) BASIN, MINIMUM VOLUME I FILL WITH CONCRETE TO ELEVATION OF BOTTOM 1 -720 CU.FT. OF DETENTION BASIN. 3/4-WIDE SLOT(VERTICAL)FOR INLET. 4-PVC PIPE,OUTLET.10 FT.LONG. FLOWUNE(OUT) 81.85 X s47 3T.D \� 29 I 1 2 I F l>N11 I •! EXISTING BUILDING I \ 0 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1'=20' Prepared By. Rocky Mountain Engineers a P.O. Box 883, Bozeman, Montana 59771 t (406) 586-4859 a p p 0 p 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 T V` 7 I , Its A- IRL iE .it T� `��v ..ti•... JAL � {�) r��v �W i I I I ( r l SCALE, 1/16" 1'-0' FiC U �� z0� I I < - OFFICES ABOVE �r ..__,ILI SCALE1 1/16" - 1'-0" I u' li I I V SCALES 1/16" - 1'-0" r SCALE, 1/8" - 1'-0" E L4.J --f� -- 1 1,77 In h I FUll i 1l� � I TE IT IE "'v A- FT TC n •i SCALE r I/8" = -O" _ '