Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
638300223002666012)
�^_—'.:.�.^i+��TrN�i»�:i...c_ q'ti,�"j►1_."'ttir.` .�!".�3X'r: .��4y,,c, - - - -- - �n"+.+�+.sw.-...." - -: " 'Ail ELLIS STREET Campbell-Lusin L.L.C. December 19,. 00 i i r � r i d J FILE REVIEW SHEET C,O Pu.D File Name: `{�A�F�n �a�jr,o.� �cn J File No.: '7,-60l `7 1 4A Pub Reference Files: (�- 1 4-A DATE DATE DONE DUE DONE BY DRC initial week review DRC second week review I/c' k' ,Zt DRC final week review AA- Notice to paper (not <15 or >45 days prior to CC ) fJ 3(� 74 Notice to Adjoiners (not.<10 days prior to final DRC),.,,:,. 1 i Post notice (not <10 days prior to final DRC) Staff Report to..City Commission City Commission work session --- City Commission hearing Approval letter mailed to Applicant Improvements Agreement mailed to Applicant approved approved w/ conds denied date DRC Action C) o CC Action Final Site Plan due by: c? it q I D Improvements Agreement returned: Final Site Plan approved on: Financial Guarantee received on: Financial Guarantee released on: Date of Temporary Occupancy: Date of Final Occupancy: rr D cAQ ,�,� „` w , , � '.�trr.. ti:; :.r. ��� �� ��'t - 351 g �� 1 i i a {, � y . ` PR(_), ECT ACTIVITY LOG CITY OF I;OZEtiiAN DEP_ FT�1ENT �ti OF PLC I1 s D COyLKT--- TY DEti _L Pti1F T I ! PROJECT -N CIE: ;;� FILE y 0: D:�T �CTIViT- STA F I S 1_J ' PERSON HOURS HOURS I n �r 5 I „�.�-�i csz. r�.d iac�.w � c� � ��j.� i ( � �•3;S— I 3 { 31 I C-C, 3111 ( I o157— L?3oaSl I j j C- �kp as-;aS+ 1 i 1 1 1 I I l I j 1 C� P C7 ofil FILE REVIEW FOR COMPLETENESS BY IF COMPLETE, GIVE TO CAROL FOR FILE. IF INCOMPLETE, WRITE/CONTACT APPLICANT AND EXPLAIN WHY BY: To DRC: t I? t 1 LP/1- To DRB: _ DRB Report due To Planning Board: Planning Board Report due: To Zoning Commission: Zoning Conunission Report due: To City Commission: City Commission packet due: City Commission Wor Session: Notice to Paper o2 j for cA Id publication Notice to Adjoiners/Post: / CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net November 15,2013 Brant Benson 1450 Ellis St., Ste. 201 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies Professional Center Lighting Modification—Z-00171B 1450 Ellis Street Dear Brant: The Bozeman Department of Community Development is pleased to award approval of your request to retrofit the existing parking lot light fixtures. Staff has reviewed the proposal against Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Following review, Staff forwarded the recommended conditions of approval to the Director of Community Development who is responsible for the final decision. The project is approved subject to the following and requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code: Code Provisions ■ Per Section 38.01.080 & 38.34.110, the proposed project shall be completed as approved and conditioned in the application. Any modifications to the submitted and approved application materials shall invalidate the project's legitimacy, unless the applicant submits the proposed modifications for review and approval by the Department of Community Development prior to undertaking said modifications. The only exception to this law is repair. ■ Per Section 38.34.100.6,the applicant shall obtain a building permit within one year of approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Please call the Building Department at 406-582-2375 for more information on the building permit process. You have the right to appeal this decision of the Community Development Director pursuant to the provisions of Article 38.35 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Please note that this decision is also subject to appeal by other aggrieved parties as defined by Sec. 38.42.080 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Such appeals must be filed pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 38.35.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. An appeal must be filed within 10 working days following the date of this decision. If a valid appeal is filed,no further action on the project may proceed until a decision on the appeal is made by the City Commission, and the Community Development Department and Building Division will not be able to approve any building permits or to perform any inspections related to this approval. If you have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance,please feel free to contact me at 406-582- 2260. Development Review Division Policy and Planning Division Building Division Sincerel , Brian Krueger Development Review Manager CC: Northern Rockies Professional Center, 1532 Ellis St., Ste. 201, Bozeman, MT 59715 Building Division Page 2 CITY CF BCZEPM *** (1.6T0 s f=PT*** Oper: PRTMI Tye EP DraFer; 1 Date: 11IMt]3 01 Ewe=pt m: 56':"• 1 Year Rxber A'bunt PZ 2013 P>_W% &ZCNI% 5.00 NDUHEF!ROCKIES PROFE9 I Tender detail CK GfCK 15ED $25.00 Total tendered $25.00 Total payment $25.00 Trans date: 11/07/13 Time: 9:31:00 Tw YW! i CITY OF BOZEMAN FEE A#LIES- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M.Stiff Professional Buildi �/J hone 406-582-2260 .. 20 East Olive Street D IE C E G v I fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 I ning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 NOV 0 2013 www.bozeman.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A PL�(t° ,, �.,T � Divo PLANNING ,',,,. . DEVELOPMENT 1. Name of Project/Development 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Al -7Ph y /�, Pr E-mail Address: 6 d Mailing Address: 1.5 3 Z l/S Z L)/ p Phone: 4/6 6 --S-Y'7-VS-01 FAX: VO6- S"9 7- 3.Applicant Information: Name: Ara' &q SG,n E-mail Address: Mailing Address:/,ySO //.S ff s4l",1�/ /J✓Qn7t'JJ�i�M�aQSPI tjrth�r'�•�. GQ�*-� Phone: yGG - S�J-115 7 FAX: 7 e� SJ (o-q//6 4. Representative Information: Name: 1-?ei swl E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: Olc -Sa ��s7 FAX: 5. Legal Description: 6. Street Address: /i�v 7. Project Description: P��kn /bt / 54q- b,«y �Qfro P� w, , L.FrJ 8. Zoning Designation(s): A)_10 9. Current Land Use(s): i/�esS�S 10. Bozeman Community Plan Designation: _T�w4t_v ' a/ 11. Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: 12. Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ 13. Is the subject site within an urban renewal distract? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a No,go to question 14 13a.Which urban renewal district? ❑Downtown ❑ Northeast(NURD) ❑ North Th Avenue 14. Is the subject site within an overlay district? ❑ Yes,answer question 14a No,go to question 15 14a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 15.Will this application require a deviation(s)? ❑ Yes,list UDC section(s): *No 16.Application Type(please check all that apply): ❑O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A. Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan 0 C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑ D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑ S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑ E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑ U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G. Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V. Subdivision Exemption ❑ H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑ I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑ K Conditional Use Permit ❑Z.Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑ BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal 19 Other. This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8'/7- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used,they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are Wednesdays at 5:00 pm. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further,I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representatives access to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050,BMC). I (We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: I Property Owner's Signature: - G �1 Date:ea- Property Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03;Amended 9/17/04,5/1/06;9/18/07,revised 11/14/11) 0 • B. ❑ Amendment/Modification of a Plan Approved On or After 9-3-91. Amendment/Modification of a Plan Approved On or After 9-3-91 Information Yes No N/A 1. All amendments or modifications shall be shown on a revised site plan drawing ❑ ❑ 2. Stormwater Management Permit Application required ❑ (2 ❑ Based on the information submitted with this application, and a review of other pertinent information, I hereby find that the amended plan IS IS NOT (circle one) in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan. If the amended plan is not in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan, the proposal shall be subject to all plan review and approval provisions of the Unified Development Code. Substantial compliance may be shown by demonstrating the following. 1. The proposed use is allowed under the same zoning district use classification as the previous use, however replacement of nonconforming uses must comply with the provisions of Chapter 38.32, BMC (Nonconfor mi g Situations); 2. Changes proposed for the site, singly or cumulatively, do not increase lot coverage by buildings, storage areas,parking areas or impervious surfaces and/or do not result in an increase in intensity of use as measured by parking requirements,traffic generation or other measurable off-site impacts; a. By more than 20 percent for developments not meeting one or more of the criteria of Section 38.33.010.A.2.e,BMC;OR b. By more than 10 percent for developments meeting or exceeding one or more of the criteria of Section 38.33.010.A.2.e,BMC; 3. The proposed use does not continue any unsafe or hazardous conditions previously existing on the site or associated with the proposed use of the property. Planning Director Comments/Conditions of Approval: i Page 4 i SUSTAINING LTL TO E TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 10. CLTOMEMBER IESNA 905 Harrison Street•Allentown,PA 18103•610-770-1044•Fax 6io-77o-8912•www.LuminaireTesting.com Integrating Sphere Test Report Relevant Standards IES LM-79-2008 ANSI C78.377-2008, ANSI C82.77 CIE 13.3-1995, CIE 15-2004 i Prepared For LED Industries, Inc. Brian Henrie Suite 200 201 Sheridan Springs Road Lake Geneva, WI 53147 i Catalog Number 24057 LTL Test Number 24806 Test Date 2011-08-10 Prepared By Approved By Eric Gaudreau,Technician III Brian Moyer, Engineer The results contained in this report pertain only to the tested sample. This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval of Underwriters Laboratories. LTL Test Number 24806-Page 1 of 4 SUSTABANG CLTLDLUM[INAIR]E TESTING LABORATORY, INC. "� �`�` IESNA 905 Harrison Street•Allentown,PA 18103•6io-770-1044•Fax 610-770-8912•www.LuminaireTesting.com Luminaire Description: Cast aluminum housing, extruded aluminum heatsink, no enclosure Catalog Number: 24057 Lamp: 18 white LEDs with clear plastic optics below each Mounting: Horizontal/Base up Ballast/Driver: One Thomas Research Products LED25W-24 Luminaire to 5 orizonta Summary of Results Test Conditions Radiant Flux: 5562 mW Test Temperature: 24.4 °C Luminous Flux: 1780 Lumens Voltage: 208.1 VAC Luminaire Efficacy: 90.2 Lumens/Watt Current: 0.1012 A CCT: 5056 K Power: 19.73 W CRI(Ra): 74.1 Power Factor: 0.937 Chromaticity(x): 0.3436 Frequency: 60 Hz Chromaticity(y): 0.3518 Current THU 18.5 % Chromaticity(u): 0.2103 Chromaticity(v): 0.3230 Duv: 0.0000 Testing was performed in a Labsphere SLMS7650 two meter integrating sphere using the 4rr geometry method, a Labsphere CDS 1100 spectrometer, and LightMtrX software. Absorption correction was employed for this measurement. LTL Test Number 24806-Page 2 of 4 i SUSTAINING TLDLUM[INAIR]E TESTING LABORATORY, INC. ' EM f& ` IESNA 9o5 Harrison Street•Allentown,PA 18103•610-T70-1044•Fax 610-770-8912-www.LuminaireTesting.com Chromaticity Coordinates x y u v U. V. Duv 0.3436 0.3518 0.2103 0.3230 0.2103 0.4846 0.0000 Color Rendering Index Detail Ra(CRI) R1 R2 I R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 74.1 72.6 78.2 80.1 74.7 72.7 68.8 82.2 63.1 -10.0 46.1 70.6 46.0 73.0 88.5 CIE 1931,2 Degree 520 CIE 1931 x,y Chromaticity Diagram 0.80000 1 Nominal CCT Quadrangles; I zsoo KE 510 540 i 3 100 K �.. ...i.. -.. 0.7000 550 iw '0A2z -=--- -------�--�-( ---j----`- � -- 560 I 0.6000 4000 K 570 500 j 0.5000 560 I I I i 5000 K I I 590 a 0.4000 , % y I y TGM60CI K D6 a 610 o:w_ ---i--- ..-- --- -- 3-'�----- ---- ---'1'-_------------ a 6�p i 0.3M0 490 630 7000 K I I I 78Ci r i i I O.z000 480 �� o:3z- -- -'' -jDUT x=1 0.3436 y-Q.3518 01� 4m I i ' inside Quad5000 K j ' 380 0.1000 0.2000 0.30M 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0 8 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 x0.10 0. 2 0. 4 0.46 0.48 0.50 x 50.00 Flux vs Wavelength -- 45.00 - 40.00 -- E 35.00 E 30.00 x 225.00 - LL 20.00 U n 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 Wavelength(nm) LTL Test Number 24806-Page 3 of 4 SUSTAINING IMMM CL LT L�Ji�I INAIRE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 'Ta. IESNA 905 Harrison Street•Allentown,PA 18103•610-770-1044•Fax 6lo-77o-89i2•www.LuminaireTesting.com Spectral Power Distribution A nm mW/nm A nm mW/nm A nm mW/nm A nm mW/nm A nm mW/nm A nm mW/nm A nm mW/nm 350 0.158 422 5.52 494 7.58 566 29.7 638 16.0 710 3.45 782 0.612 351 0.163 423 6.34 495 7.90 567 29.6 639 15.7 711 3.37 783 0.598 352 0.163 424 7.20 496 8.19 568 29.5 640 15.4 712 3.29 784 0.586 353 0.149 425 8.19 497 8.52 569 29.5 641 15.2 713 3.21 785 0.573 354 0.151 426 9.24 498 8.88 570 29.4 642 14.9 714 3.13 786 0.559 355 0.148 427 10.3 499 9.35 571 29.3 643 14.7 715 3.06 787 0.545 356 0.155 428 11.5 500 9.81 572 29.3 644 14.4 716 2.99 788 0.534 357 0.151 429 12.7 501 10.2 573 29.2 645 14.1 717 2.92 789 0.522 358 0.149 430 14.0 502 10.8 574 29.2 646 13.9 718 2.85 790 0.510 359 0.148 431 15.3 503 11.3 575 29.1 647 13.7 719 2.78 791 0.494 360 0.145 432 16.7 504 11.8 576 29.0 648 13.4 720 2.71 792 0.485 361 0.139 433 18.1 505 12.4 577 28.9 649 13.2 721 2.64 793 0.475 362 0.137 434 19.6 506 13.0 578 28.7 650 13.0 722 2.58 794 0.463 363 0.140 435 21.0 507 13.6 579 28.7 651 12.7 723 2.51 795 0.453 364 0.144 436 22.7 508 14.2 580 28.5 652 12.5 724 2.46 796 0.442 365 0.145 437 24.3 509 14.8 581 28.5 653 12.2 725 2.39 797 0.431 366 0.1 77 438 26.2 510 15.4 582 28.3 654 12.0 726 2.34 798 0.422 367 0.1 11 439 28.2 511 16.0 583 28.3 655 11.7 727 2.27 799 0.412 368 0.143 440 30.2 512 16.7 584 28.2 656 11.5 728 2.22 800 0.404 369 0.1 44 441 32.6 513 17.3 585 28.0 657 11.3 729 2.16 801 0.395 370 0.144 442 35.0 514 17.8 586 28.0 658 11.1 730 2.11 802 1 0.385 371 0.146 443 37.4 515 18.5 587 27.8 659 10.8 731 2.06 803 1 0.374 372 0.142 444 39.9 516 19.0 588 27.7 660 10.6 732 2.01 804 0.366 373 0.1 88 445 41.8 517 19.6 589 27.6 661 10.4 733 1.96 805 0.358 374 0.133 446 43.5 518 20.2 590 27.4 662 10.2 734 1.91 806 0.350 375 0.132 447 44.7 519 20.7 591 27.3 663 9.99 735 1.86 807 0.342 376 0.131 448 45.2 520 21.2 592 27.1 664 9.78 736 1.82 808 0.334 377 0.132 449 45.1 521 21.8 593 26.8 1 665 9.57 737 1.77 809 0.327 378 N0.1 450 44.3 522 22.2 594 26.7 666 9.36 738 1.73 810 0.320 379 451 43.0 523 22.8 595 26.5 667 9.16 739 1.69 811 0.312 380 452 41.0 524 23.2 596 26.4 668 8.97 740 1.65 812 0.304 381 453 38.6 525 23.7 597 26.1 669 8.76 741 1.61 813 0.299 382 454 36.1 526 24.1 598 26.0 670 8.60 742 1.57 814 0.291 383 455 33.4 527 24.4 599 25.7 671 8.42 743 1.53 815 0.289 384 456 30.8 528 24.9 600 25.5 672 8.23 744 1.49 816 0.280 385 0.132 457 28.4 529 25.2 601 25.3 673 8.05 745 1.46 817 0.276 386 0.130 458 26.2 530 25.6 602 25.1 674 7.88 746 1.43 818 0.270 387 0.133 459 24.2 531 25.9 003 24.8 675 7.70 747 1.39 819 0.261 388 0.133 460 22.6 532 26.1 604 24.7 676 7.55 748 1.36 820 0.253 389 0.133 461 21.0 533 26.5 605 24.5 677 7.38 749 1.33 821 0.249 390 0.137 462 19.7 534 26.7 606 24.1 678 7.21 750 1.30 822 0.242 391 0.139 463 18.5 535 27.1 607 24.0 679 7.06 751 1.27 823 0.237 392 0.144 464 17.4 536 27.3 608 23.7 680 6.91 752 1.23 824 0.231 393 0.148 465 16.5 537 27.5 609 23.4 681 6.77 753 1.21 825 1 0.228 394 0.149 466 15.5 538 27.8 610 23.2 682 6.62 754 1.18 826 0.220 395 0.151 467 14.6 539 27.9 611 22.9 683 6.48 755 1.15 827 0.217 396 0.161 468 13.7 540 28.2 612 22.8 684 6.32 756 1.12 828 0.212 397 0.170 469 13.0 541 28.3 613 22.5 685 6.20 757 1.10 829 0.206 398 0.178 470 12.2 542 28.5 614 22.3 686 6.05 758 1.07 830 0.203 399 10.193 471 11.5 543 28.6 615 22.0 687 5.93 759 1.05 831 0.198 400 0.210 472 10.8 544 28.7 616 21.8 688 779 760 1.02 832 0.193 401 0.230 473 10.2 545 28.9 617 21.5 689 5.68 761 0.998 833 0.188 402 0.254 474 9.69 546 29.0 618 21.3 690 5.54 762 0.975 834 0.186 403 0.286 475 9.29 547 29.2 619 21.0 691 5.42 763 0.953 835 0.182 404 0.327 476 8.85 548 29.2 620 20.8 692 5.29 764 0.931 836 0.177 405 0.375 477 8.47 549 29.3 621 20.5 693 5.17 765 0.912 837 0.173 406 0.434 478 8.16 550 29.4 622 20.2 694 5.05 766 0.891 838 0.169 407 0.509 479 7.89 551 29.5 623 20.0 695 4.94 767 0.867 839 0.166 408 0.593 480 7.70 552 29.5 624 19.7 696 4.82 768 0.847 840 0.161 409 0.693 481 7.49 553 29.7 625 19.4 697 4.71 769 0.830 841 0.158 410 0.812 482 7.30 554 29.7 626 19.2 698 4.60 770 0.808 842 0.155 411 0.963 483 7.14 555 29.7 227 18.9 699 4.49 771 0.789 843 0.151 412 1.14 484 7.06 556 29.7 628 18.6 700 4.38 772 0.774 844 0.148 413 1.34 485 6.95 557 29.8 629 18.3 701 4.29 773 0.754 845 0.145 414 1.58 486 6.87 558 29.9 630 18.1 702 4.19 774 0.738 846 0.144 415 1.87 487 6.86 559 29.8 631 17.8 703 4.09 775 0.723 847 0.138 416 2.20 488 6.83 560 29.9 632 17.5 704 3.99 776 0.706 848 0.135 417 2.58 489 6.85 561 29.9 633 17.3 705 3.90 777 0.688 849 0.132 418 3.04 490 6.92 562 29.8 634 17.1 706 3.80 778 0.6 44 850 0.130 419 3.56 491 7.06 563 29.8 635 16.8 707 3.72 779 0.658 420 4.13 492 7.20 564 29.8 636 16.5 708 3.63 780 0.644 421 4.78 493 7.36 565 29.7 637 16.2 709 3.53 781 0.627 LTL Test Number 24806-Page 4 of 4 I gUSTAUaNG ( ZgSM4 LTL LUMINAIRE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. NOMMER 9o5 Harrison Street•Allentown,PA 18103•610-77o-lo44•Fax 610-770-8912•wunv.LuminaireTesting.com LTL NUMBER: 24057 DATE: 2011-07-15 PREPARED FOR: LED INDUSTRIES CATALOG NUMBER: G2-1 LUMINAIRE: CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, EXTRUDED ALUMINUM HEATSINK, NO ENCLOSURE LAMP: 18 WHITE LEDS WITH CLEAR PLASTIC OPTICS BELOW EACH LED POWER SUPPLY: ONE THOMAS RESEARCH PRODUCTS LED25W-24 ELECTRICAL VALUES : 208 . OVAC, 0 . 0976A, 18 . 93W , PF=0 . 932 LUMINAIRE EFFICACY: 88 . 7 LUMENS/WATT NOTE: THIS TEST WAS PERFORMED USING THE CALIBRATED PHOTODETECTOR METHOD OF ABSOLUTE PHOTOMETRY. * .. �g .. En Y IES CLASSIFICATION: TYPE III LONGITUDINAL CLASSIFICATION:SHORT .50 CUTOFF CLASSIFICATION: CUTOFF** **CUTOFF DESIGNATION IS NOT DEFINED FOR ABSOLUTE PHOTOMETRIC TESTS.TIIIS CUTOFF RATING IS BASED ON T1IE MAXIMUM CANDELA READING PER LUMINAIRE RATED AT 1000 LUMENS. 0 Horizontal FLUX DISTRIBUTION LUMENS DOWNWARD UPWARD TOTALS HOUSE 838.45 1.08 839.53 SIDE STREET 838.45 1.08 839.53 SIDE TOTALS 1676.90 2.15 1679.05 Approved By: �*DATA WAS WAS ACQUIRED USING THE CALIBRATED PHOTODETECTOR METHOD OF ABSOLUTE PHOTOMETRY. A UDT MODEL #211 PHOTODETECTOR AND UDT MODEL #S370 OPTOMETER COMBINATION WERE USED AS A STANDARD. A SPECTRAL MISMATCH CORRECTION FACTOR WAS EMPLOYED BASED ON THE SPECTRAL RESPONSNITY OF THE PHOTODETECTOR AND THE SPECTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION OF THE TEST SUBJECT. TESTING WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IES LM-79-08. TEST ANGULAR INCREMENTS AND REPORT FORMATTING WAS BASED ON IES LM-31-95 (WITHDRAWN). LTL LUMINAIIE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. shoudRlm ZESNA 905 Harrison Street-Allentown,PA 18103-610-77o-io44-Fax 610-770-8912-www.LuminaireTesting.com ISOFOOTCANDLE LINES OF HORIZONTAL ILLUMINATION VALUES BASED ON 20.00 FOOT MOUNTING HEIGHT -3 0.02I Q01 0.1 -2 —� o° Is \ N °a 1 G N 7 O O C: ° _I L 0 s O 0 House Side Street Side a> O / axim da del I I rn N 76 c 4J -�- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.00 c CU I I I I 0N — — — — — I— — — — — + 0�— — — — — — . — — — — — — — — — — — . — — 1.75 — 2 I I I I (n 1 / 0° I I I / I 0.05 1 1 2.75 3 p:02— I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I 1.bo 2.115 1. 5 6.bo I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Longitudinal Distance in Units of Mounting Heights j_ PROJECTION OF HALF-MAX CANDELA CONTOUR PAGE 2-LTL NUMBER 24057 SUSTAUANG LTL LIMINAIR E TESTING LABORATORY' INC. �� 905 Harrison Street•Allentown,PA 18103•610-77o-lo44•Fax 6io-77o-89i2•www.LuminaireTesting.com CANDELA DISTRIBUTION 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 90 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 90 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 87.5 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 85 10 9 9 9 10 10 11 10 9 9 9 82.5 14 14 14 16 18 18 18 17 14 14 14 80 23 23 24 27 31 31 33 30 24 23 22 77.5 38 37 40 48 53 53 55 51 42 36 36 75 74 75 85 99 103 101 101 96 83 70 68 72.5 218 210 209 214 211 203 203 202 197 200 201 70 452 445 429 403 378 366 369 387 413 428 428 67.5 631 632 623 608 589 576 579 596 628 647 649 65.5 651 649 658 670 668 669 666 667 674 676 672 65 641 641 652 656 660 662 660 660 669 666 666 62.5 561 554 555 555 554 550 548 553 554 558 560 60 480 480 483 484 485 483 484 489 487 487 486 57.5 454 453 457 462 464 462 463 464 469 466 464 55 403 402 408 406 409 413 416 410 405 398 398 52.5 348 347 349 354 356 359 360 359 353 352 349 50 327 327 327 331 334 336 338 336 331 328 328 47.5 310 310 310 312 317 317 318 318 313 312 311 45 294 297 294 296 300 299 301 302 299 297 296 40 273 272 269 268 268 268 270 272 272 274 273 35 252 250 248 246 245 243 247 248 250 250 251 30 235 234 234 233 234 233 235 234 232 233 231 25 237 236 237 236 237 236 239 238 237 238 237 20 238 237 237 237 237 236 238 238 236 237 238 15 237 239 235 236 237 235 237 237 235 236 238 10 237 237 235 236 236 235 237 237 236 236 236 5 237 237 237 237 236 236 238 237 235 235 238 01 236 236 236 236 236 236 236 236 1 236 236 236 PAGE 3-LTL NUMBER 24057 OWNER MR Fm�N Appm WANS-wiparromp-dw aw saws 10MG-01 F-do WINNER mum !4 N WON. wo ;t4 h Nh, 4 M ,-.A �j% PIP M, Aft PIP �7 IP RAN Raiff low a OWN NIZ4 WO Ifl NG "b i i•ii.�,..�.�.�•,�•.��� ..��.����. .. •�♦�SEA,�� ��01 �. ��� am .♦.,."v �♦�������������� � NOW, IIII�jA I���••�j� EM6000NisIBMFam16*11tit WIN�.,4"oil �����������1111111 �IIIIIIIIIIII����■■■1111���■.:.--=::'%=-.:.■����III■■�����IIIIII 111���� IIIII��I�I�II-��,�wwas mal 0 401-AW •INCHES sava �-g�;.p••l.l.������,-�j�.�.� .;•,••,,.•,, �•,,■i■■IN �jsajjjj pffil Lo �• 4 f% 4A(VIAA o ■i��•�.�•rNA11 Off •��.■i•�•■����■■ MANNINONX � ��1�1�1 111111I1l1l 014 �� ���� �.�0���i�i�ill 4$ �1 �� �� PIP IN WHIM,� �������•�•�..Rol _p L -.ow •.:.�G�i ,i�i VERTICAL PLANE THROUGH DEGREES LATERAL LATERAL CONE THROUGH 65.5 DEGREES VERTICAL SUST EA NG CLTO LUMINAIRETIESTI NG LABORATORY, INC. haudm � SNA 905 Harrison Street-Allentown,FA 18103-610-77o-1o44-Fax 610-770-8912-wunu.LuminaireTesting.com FLUX DISTRIBUTION TABLE BASED ON THE IESNA LUMINAIRE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FLUX OF 180' LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRE 1 ZONE LUMENS LUMENS FORWARD LIGHT 838 49.9 UH UH 100' 100' FL ( 0°-30°) 99 5.9 UL UL FM so•� sD- (30°-60°) 378 22.5 s0' BVH�� FVH BD FH (60°-80°) 355 21.1 BH �U9 FH FVH (80°-90°) 6 0.4 FM 00 BM 60' BACK LIGHT 838 49.9 BL FL BL ( 0°-30°) 99 5.9 BACKLIGHT FORWARD LIGHT BM (30°-60°) 378 22.5 30 30 BH (60°-80°) 355 21.1 BVH (80°-90°) 6 0.4 UPLIGHT 2 0.1 BACK FRONT UL (90°-100°) 2 0.1 UH (100°-180°) 0 0.0 TRAPPED LIGHT NA NA BUG (Backlight, Uplight, Glare) Rating Asymmetrical Luminaire Types 131 Ul G1 (Type I, II, III, IV) Quadrilateral Symmetrical Luminaire Types 131 U1 GO (Type V, Area Light) PAGE 5-LTL NUMBER 24057 ON B®2�, CITY OFEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY PiwELOPMENT v 9'Z * t Street address: Alfred A.I.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 a __ 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2 363 le 1883 ,�� Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Co. o� Bozeman,1VIontana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net January 18, 2001 Campbell/Lusin LLC 3499 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies Professional Center: MaSub/PUD Preliminary Plat and Zoning/PUD (#P-0047 and#Z-00171) Dear Sirs: The review of the above applications has been continued, please note the following changes. The final Development Review Committee (DRC) has been scheduled for Tuesday, February 6, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. and by the Design Review Board on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 at 3:30 p.m. The DRC and DRB meetings are held in the Conference Room, Alfred M. Stiff Professional Office Building located at 20 East Olive Street. The City Planning Board will discuss the Subdivision application on Wednesday, February 21, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. and the City Commission will conduct a public hearing on both proposals at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,March 19, 2001, in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street. You and your representative will be sent information prior to each meeting. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner JM/jm cc: Gary Lusin, 3200 East Hollyhock, Belgrade, MT 59714 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 2415 West Main Street, Bozeman, MT 59718 Bayliss Architects, 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 C & H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. 2415 West Main Street,Suite 1 • Bozeman,Montana 59718 Phone(406)587-1115 Fax(406)587-9768 . E-Mail:c&hengineering@theglobal.net January 18, 2001 J A M 19 20061 C;ITY PLANNING City of Bozeman Planning Office Attn: Jami Morris P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: Request for Project Continuance, Northern Rockies Professional Center (00220) Dear Jami, On behalf of the project owners,we are requesting a continuance which will allow the extension of the review process on this project. C&H Engineering understands that additional information is needed from Bayliss Architects who will provide the information by Friday, January 19, 2001, as discussed. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Per M. Hjalmar n, .E. cc: Bayliss Architects (fax only) Campbell/Lusin, LLC (fax only) G:\c&h\00\00220\office\Conti nuance.wpd Civil/Structural Engineering and Survevirg 01/02/2001 14:05 9 06-587-9768 C&H ENGTWING PAGE 01 C & H Engin eerin g and Surveying, Inc. 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1, Bozeman, MT 59718 (406) 587-1115 ■ Fax: (406) 587-9768 e-mail: chengineers@theglobal.net FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: TO: �,�/ ATTN: , Q�G �� 7. / FAX: RE: d Aah 100Y y SENDER: You should receive / pages(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, please call 406 587-1115 %aye, �a�i� �sri� %Ov GvG�G /�/'fir; /b� z,`�F� �iye�r/�J O�r/�G ,/✓t'z�,�nvr ��v� a•�d' ts��td! f3' J`�!C c'i����*l� /�yOl� /J.e rG 4+�z/ f*to✓G �v��jv.�.,l �1 w-vl City of Bozeman 2113 Receipt $ 9v Bozeman, Montana ( a'1 9 -ao 19 Received of � 1v0 nLtd n� the sum of Dr, -i(-,,acscna OoQ 44 5C r Dollars for Z c. \- --lRl� 0�BO CITY ABOOZEMAN U� x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . * • Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone: (406)582-2360 20 East Olive Street 1 83 ?gee Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406) 582-2363 o E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net December 26, 2000 Campbell/Lusin LLC 3499 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies Professional Center: MaSub/PUD Preliminary Plat and Zoning/PUD (#P- 0047 and#Z-00171) Dear Sirs: The applications for the Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat and Zoning PUD have been received. The applications have been assigned to Senior Planner Dave Skelton. The applications have been reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklist and appear to meet the submittal requirements. However, please understand that during the course of review there may be items identified or issues which need to be addressed. Should that occur, Planner Skelton will be in contact with you. The applications will be discussed by the Development Review Committee(DRC)on two Tuesdays, January 9" and 16', 2001, at 10:00 a.m. and by the Design Review Board on Tuesday, January 9`"at 3:30 p.m. The DRC and DRB meetings are held in the Conference Room, Alfred M. Stiff Proffessional Office Building located at 20 East Olive Street. The City Planning Board will discuss the Subdivision application on Tuesday, February 6, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. and the City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposals at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 20, 2001, in the Commission Meeting Room,City.Hall, 411 East Main Street. You and your representative will be sent information prior to each meeting. Copies of the receipts are enclosed. Please feel free to contact Planner Morris if you have any questions regarding the applications or the review process in general. Sincerely, Carol L. Schott Enc: Administrative Secretary CLS/cls cc: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., Attn: Matt Cotterman, 2415 West Main Street,Bozeman, MT 59718 Planning Z&ning subdivision review • annexation historic preservation housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination 1 ! � 1 BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE 1 P. O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MT 59771 (406) 582-2360, FAX 582-2363 ' SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS The preliminary plat shall be legibly drawn at a horizontal scale no smaller than 100 feet to the inch, and may show approximate boundaries, dimensions, distances and areas, unless specifically noted. 1 The plat shall be on one or more sheets of 18"x 24" or 24"x 36"paper. Where accurate information is required, surveying and engineering data shall be prepared under the supervision of a registered engineer or registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Montana, as their respective licensing 1 laws allow. A completed"Subdivision Procedures Form"and Preliminary Platting Certificate must accompany this application ______________________ ------ --------------------------------------- 1 1. Name and address of property owner: Campbell/Lusin L.L.C. ' 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 587-4501 2. Name and address of applicant/representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying 1 2415 W. Main St., Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 1 3. Name of Subdivision: Northern Rockies Subdivision 4. Location(legal): Tract C, COS 1177C, SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 8, T2S, R6E 1 Common address: 1 5. Acres: Gross: 7.6909 Net: 1.8699 6. Total Number of Lots: 7 1 7. School District: Bozeman Fire District: Fort Ellis ' 8. Date of Pre-Submittal or Pre-Application Review: August 22, 2000 ' 9. Indicate the proposed use(s) and number of lots, spaces, or units for each use: Residential, single family 1 Residential, multiple family 1 MaSubPrehm. App. 9/97 Y 7 Planned Unit Development Condominium ' Townhouse Recreation or Second Home ' Mobile Home Park Recreational Vehicle Park ' Commercial Industrial Other (please describe in narrative) ' 10. Current land use: The land is currently vacant ' 11. Existing zoning or other regulations: R-O ' 12. Review Fee: Major Subdivision: $200 plus$3 per lot to 100 lots,then$1 per lot for each lot in excess of 100 ' 13. A Preliminary Platting Certificate,prepared by a Montana Title Company, must accompany this application. ' Please refer to the Subdivision Procedures Form for the number of copies and supplemental information needed. The correct number of copies plus one copy of the completed Subdivision Procedures form must be submitted,with the appropriate fee,or the application will not be accepted. ' This application form must be signed by the applicant and the property owner (if different). ' Applicant's Signature PropertyOwner's Signature Date: Date: ' MaSubPrehm.App. 9/97 BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE SUBDIVISION PROCEDURES FORM ' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS This form is used to evaluate and accept preliminary plat applications for major subdivisions. Failure to provide all applicable information will result in an incomplete submittal and will cause a delay in the review ' of the project. This form must be completely filled out and returned with the appropriate fee and application. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' NAME OF PROJECT: NORTHERN ROCKIES P.U.D. SUBDIVISION ' PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURES Subdivisions consisting of six or more parcels will be considered a Major Subdivision,and will be reviewed ' per Chapter 16.10 of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations. At least thirty(30)days prior to the next available Planning Board meeting,the following number of copies of the preliminary plat and supplemental information must be submitted: Within the City of Bozeman or the Zoning Jurisdictional Area --- 25 copies Within the Planning Jurisdiction,but outside the Zoning Jurisdiction -- 20 copies After a complete submittal is received, the application will be distributed to affected agencies for review. The Planning Board will conduct a public hearing on the application and will forward a recommendation to the appropriate governing body. For subdivisions within the City of Bozeman, or for subdivisions on land which has concurrently applied for annexation to the corporate limits of the City of.Bozeman, the City Commission will consider the application and the Planning Board's recommendation during a regular public meeting of the Commission. Since the Planning Board is the designated agency to hold the public hearing on the subdivision,additional public comment can not be accepted by the City Commission at that meeting. For subdivisions located outside the corporate limits of the City of Bozeman, the Gallatin County Commission will consider the application and Planning Board recommendation during a public hearing ' before the County Commission. Additional comment will be accepted at this additional public hearing. The appropriate governing body shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the preliminary plat ' within 60 days of determination that the application is complete,unless a written extension is provided from the subdivider. Findings of Fact and Order will be prepared for the subdivision once the appropriate governing body makes a final decision on the subdivision. Preliminary plat approval is in force for not more ' than three calendar years or less than one calendar year. Extensions may be granted. If a final plat is not submitted within the allotted time, preliminary plat approval expires. PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The preliminary plat application for a major subdivision must contain all of the following infonnation. The ' preliminary plat shall be legibly drawn at a horizontal scale no smaller than 100 feet to the inch, and may show approximate boundaries,dimensions,distances and areas,unless specifically noted. The plat shall be on one or more sheets of 18" x 24" or 24" x 36" paper. Where accurate information is required, surveying and engineering data shall be prepared under the supervision of a registered engineer or land surveyor, licensed in the State of Montana. Prelimprocedure.fmi ' Major Sub. 9/97 • A. The submittal shall include the following (refer to Chapter 16.08.030): YES NO N/A 1. All information required with the rea lication submittal q P PP X 2. Name and location of subdivision, scale, scale bar, north arrow, date of preparation, lots and blocks (designated by number), dimensions and area of each lot, and use of each lot, if other than single-family 1 3. Streets, roads, alleys, and easements, width of r/w, grades and curvature of each; existing and proposed road names; location of intersections with arterials or X collectors 4. Names of,adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining COSs X 5. Approximate survey of exterior boundaries with bearings, distances and curve data 6. Approximate location of all section corners or legal subdivisions corners of �( sections.pertinent to the subdivision boundary 7. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope is under 10%; at 5-foot intervals if slope is between 10% and 15%; and at 10 feet if slope is 15% or greater 8. Phase lines, including distinct lines of phased infrastructure improvements 9. All appropriate certificates (refer to Chapter 16.32) X- B. The supplemental information shall include the following: YES NO N/A 1. Environmental Assessment, Community Impact and Flood Hazard Evaluation per Chapters 16.18 and 16.20 2. Map of entire subdivision on either 8%z"x 11"; 8'/z"x 14"; or 11"x 17" sheet K 3. Written statement describing requested variance(s) and facts of hardship upon X which the request is based(refer to Chapter 16.30) 4. A certified list of adjoining property owners, their mailing addresses and Y property descriptions, including property owners across public r/w and/or easements. 5. Self-adhesive mailing labels; one list for first minor subdivisions and three sets of labels for all other subdivisions, of the names and addresses required in B.4, above 6. Draft of the following documents and certificates,unless printed on the preliminary plat a) Covenants, Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners Association I Prelimprocedure.frm Major Sub. 9/97 • • I� b) Encroachment permits or letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, roads, easements, r/w or driveways intersection State, County or City highways, streets or roads c) Letter of approval where a zoning change is necessary d) Draft of other appropriate certificates e) Provision for maintenance of all roads,parks, and other required improvements f) Public improvements agreement and guarantee 7. Profile sheets for street or road grades greater than 5% 8. Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District effective upon preliminary plat approval and during construction of l� improvements. 9. Written explanation of how the fire protection requirements of Chapter 16.14.060 will be met 10. Preliminary Platting Certificate,prepared by a Montana Title Company Prelimprocedure.frm Major Sub. 9/97 l 1 RECEEIVE D BY 1 �F9 2000 CITY PLANNING 1 Northern Rockies Professional Center 1 . 1 1 Prepared for: Camp bell/Lusin L.L.C. Bozeman, Montana Prepared By: 1 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1 Bozeman, MT 59718 Bayliss Architects 212 South Tracy Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 December 2000 ' Project 00220 1 �. C & H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. ' 2415 West Main Street,Suite 1 • Bozeman,Montana 59718 Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587-9768 E-Mail:c&hengineering@theglobal.net December 15, 2000 City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Attn: Jami Morris P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 ' RE: Northern Rockies Professional Center P.U.D. Subdivision(00220) Dear Jami, Enclosed are two checks in the amount of$1116.90 and$221.00,a P.U.D.Preliminary Plan Application, ' and a Preliminary Plat Application. The Traffic Report was prepared by Marvin& Associates, and the Statement of Planning Objectives (Section E) was prepared by Bayliss Architects. The following response letter is provided as supplemental information to both applications. Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan ' 1. Document Requirements: A. A completed application form is included with this submittal B. Developer: Cam bell/Lusin, L.L.C., Members: Gary Lusin and John Campbell C. Legal Description: Tract C, Certificate of Survey No. 1177C, located in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 6 East of P.M.M.. D.. A list of adjacent property owners is included with this submittal. E. See attached information from Bayliss Architects. F. Construction will begin as soon as plan approval has been received,and is tentatively scheduled for ' the spring of 2001. No phasing is planned for this development. G. Reduced versions of the plans are included with this submittal. ' 2. Site Plan Requirements: All items listed are included on the site plan, landscape plan and the supplemental vicinity map. ' 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements: ' A. Architectural elevations are included with this submittal. Civil/Structural Engincering and Survevir.g ' B. Landscape plans are included with this submittal. ' C. Utility plans are included with the site plan. D. Ellis Street cross sections are included with this submittal. ' E. Four test holes were drilled on Jul 13 2000. A black topsoil with few organics was found from Y p g ' zero to six inches below grade. An abundant root zone was found to a depth of 12 inches. A silt loam exhibiting medium to moderate density and medium plasticity was found between four and 12 inches below grade. A brown sandy loam exhibiting moderate density,and medium plasticity was ' encountered from a depth of one to 12 feet. No evidence of groundwater was encountered in any of the test holes. ' Soils information obtained from the NRCS indicates the site consists mainly of a Blackmore soil type. This soil type offers few limitations to construction assuming groundwater is not a problem. ' Well logs in the area indicate a static water level of approximately 42 feet. It is safe to assume that the seasonal high is no closer than 20 feet from the ground surface. The nearest body of water is Placer Creek located approximately 325 feet from the east property line of the site. The creek lies approximately 45 vertical feet below the lowest point on site. The site is located outside of the 500 year floodplain. A copy of the floodplain map is included with this submittal. F. Drainage plans are included on the site plan. Preliminary drainage calculations for the detention structures are also included with this submittal ' G. No temporary facilities will be required. i H. The preliminary subdivision plat is being submitted concurrently with this plan. I. A traffic impact analysis was prepared by Marvin and Associates. The report is included ' with this submittal. J. A complete Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement is included with this submittal. 4. Reproducible Copies ' One set of mylars and 8.5" x 11" clear .film reductions are included with this submittal. Preliminary Plat ' A. 25 copies of the preliminary plat are included with all items listed shown on the lat. P p Yp p ' B. Supplemental Information: ' 1. One copy of the frill Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement is included with this submittal ' 2. A map of the entire subdivision on an I x 17" sheet is enclosed. ' 3. No variances are being requested 4. A certified list of adjoining property owner,their mailing addresses and property descriptions ' is enclosed. ' 5. Three sets of self-adhesive mailing labels with the names and addresses of the Adjoiners are included. ' 6a. Covenants, Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners Association are included. 6b. Encroachment permits 6c. No zoning changes will be required. ' 6d. No other certificates are required. 6e. Provisions for maintenance of all roads,parks,and other required improvements are included in the covenants. 6f. No improvements agreement and guarantee is required. 7. A profile sheet for Ellis Street is included. 8. A noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District is enclosed. 9. Fire protection requirements of Chapter 16.14.060 will be met by paying a fire impact fee in ' accordance with the Fire Impact Fee regulation. 10. A Preliminary Platting Certificate prepared by a Montana Title Company is included with this ' submittal. If you have any questions or comments please give me a call. Thank you. ' Sincerely, Matt Cotterman, E.I. Enc. G:\c&h\00\00220\o ffic6pudplansth\vpd bavliss 1. The immediate area around and includingthis site is agricultural land which is zoned R- � , O. There are no adjacent neighborhoods around to draw architectural designs ideas for this project. There are two large buildings, which are visually noticeable, and the ' architectural interest is lacking from one. These buildings have been completed at different times and the styles vary, however, their overall mass will allow for our development to blend into the area without increasing the visual impact. Our buildings will be smaller in square footage and height. The "neighborhood"identity will continue as planned by the present zoning regulations since this development is trying to cluster the buildings and providing a clear pedestrian network for all buildings. This development has also provided a neighborhood feeling for the main road by placing a tree lined median to help lesson the vehicular impact in the center. The new landscaping plan will have similar species of shrubs as well as larger trees as well as a meandering berm in 1 the front yard to further separate the buildings from Ellis Road. This will improve the existing hillside and breakdown the vertical scale of the buildings in relationship to the pedestrian as well as focusing the buildings to the main internal street. There is no ' historic character to draw from on the present site. The orientation and placement of all buildings has been approached with the idea of working with the major contours and ' minimizing the amounts of cut into the existing grades. 2. Yes, please see the engineering documents. 3. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. 4. No, this does not apply to this site. 5. Project is not located within a historic district. 6. Yes, this has been addressed in the Architectural Guidelines. 7. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. 8. Yes, please see the preliminary site plan. 9. Yes, please-see the preliminary site plan. ' 10. Yes, the model energy code must be used in the design of each structure. 11. Not applicable, there are no residents adjacent to this project. 12. Open space, the area has been calculated and at least 30% of the project has been left as ' open space. We have also included picnic tables and small parks in the center of the project for the enjoyment of the people utilizing this center. 13. Not applicable. The park areas are not intended for active recreational usage rather more ' gathering and eating during business hours. 14. Yes,please see the preliminary landscape plan. 15. No, at this present time there are no adjacent neighborhoods. 16. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. 17. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. Ellis Road is being improved and a sidewalk on our side shall be installed as well. 18. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. aytissArchitects,P.C.,212 South Tracy Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715 12 406 586-5007 11 406 585-8337 bayliss®baylissarchitects.com bavliss ' J 19. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. This is a schematic plan and each building needs to be designed as the lots are sold. The Architectural Guidelines explain the landscape requirements. ' 20. The project is not located next to a public park or public open space. The areas located in this project are accessible at all times. Commercial PUD ' 1. Not applicable, this is a professional business center. 2. Yes, please see the engineering documents. 3. Yes, please see the engineering documents. Total project size is 7.7 acres. ' 4. Yes, see the Architectural Guidelines for the acceptable uses. 7. The immediate area around and including this site is agricultural land, which is, zoned R-O. There are no adjacent neighborhoods around to draw architectural designs ideas for this project. There are two large buildings, which are visually noticeable, and the architectural interest is lacking from one. These buildings ' have been completed at different times and the styles vary, however, their overall mass will allow for our development to blend into the area without increasing the visual impact. Our buildings will be smaller in square footage and height. The ' "neighborhood" identity will continue as planned by the present zoning regulations since this development is trying to cluster the buildings and providing a clear pedestrian network for all buildings. This development has also provided a neighborhood feeling for the main road by placing a tree lined median to help ' lesson the vehicular impact in the center. The new landscaping plan will have similar species of shrubs as well as larger trees as well as a meandering berm in the front yard to further separate the buildings from Ellis Road. This will improve the existing hillside and breakdown the vertical scale of the buildings in relationship to the pedestrian as well as focusing the buildings to the main ' internal street. There is no historic character to draw from on the present site. The orientation and placement of all buildings has been approached with the idea of working with the major contours and minimizing the amounts of cut into the existing grades. 8. No, no off street parking has been included in the parking counts for this project. 9. This project demonstrates compliance to the Bozeman master plan. ' 10. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. It shows the areas in the center of the project and the picnic tables. Bayliss Architects,P.C.,212 South Tracy Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715 12 406 586-5007 12 406 585-8337 13 bayliss®baylissarchitects.com • ' CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING-20 EAST OLIVE STREET ' P. 0.BOX 1230,BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771-1230 (406)582-2360,FAX(406)582-2363 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Certain uses,while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District,may,under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain ' conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This review will also include a review for Certificate of Appropriateness,if applicable. Deviations and/or ' variances will be processed concurrently. Additional submittal materials apply. 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: Campbell/Lusin LLC ' 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman,MT 59715 Phone: 587-4501 ' 2. Name and mailing address of applicant/representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying,Inc. 2415 W. Main Street,Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 ' 3. Name and mailing address of Engineer/Architect/Planner: same as#2 Phone: ' 4. Name of project/development: Northern Rockies Professional Center 5. Address of proposed development: Ellis Street(no assigned address yet) ' 6. Legal Description: Tract C COS 1177C SE'/4 'g p , SW/4, Section 8, T2S,R6E ' 7. Current Zoning R-0 Land Area: sq.ft. or 7.6909 acres ' 8. Describe the proposed development(use additional sheets if necessary): The proposed project is a Planned Unit Development with seven commercial lots which will include seven two-story buildings,primarily medical offices. 9. Review Fee: $660.00 (Minimum fee after refund: $400.00) ' This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and twentY (20) copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8'/2" x I I" nor larger than 24"x 36", folded in ' individual sets no larger than 8%"x 14"in size. Application deadline varies. This application must be signed by both the applicant and property owner(if different)before the submittal will be accepted. I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applica is Signature Property Owner's Signature ' GAc&h\00\00220\office\CUP App.wpd CITY OF BOZEMAN r, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MT 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX (406) 582-2363 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------I---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant N m o be l I- LU,$i'n . L.L.C' Date: 2 SOU Residential PUD Project No rzAerrl ocl� i es Probe ss cma I C,-te.P— Commercial PUD�� The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development(PUD)Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items listed for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked"NO"or"N/A"(not applicable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal, staff will review the checklist and detemline if the application as submitted is complete. i If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB) agendas, followed by a City Planning Board review. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. 1. Document Requirements YES NO N/A The following information shall be presented in an 8`/z"x 11" vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: A. Application forms; _ B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the — — PUD' C. Legal description of the site; D. property Adjacent owners: J P (1) A copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400' of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the PUD is proposed, exclusive of public r/w; _ (2) The original list shall be included in the document; _ (3) Names and addresses shall be included on plain (no return address), #10 (4-1/8" x 9-1/2"), stamped envelopes; E. A statement of planning objectives, including: (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the i� implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 1 (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open r space areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; ✓ (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and s� industrial uses; ✓ (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; _ (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100,documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use;the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; _✓ _ (6) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated; _ (7) Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g. - home/business,utilities, transportation fuel,waste recycling); F. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the PUD, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8%"x 11" or 11" x 17" size. 2. Site Plan Requirements YES NO N/A A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale not greater than 1" = 40' or less than 1" = 100'; and composed of'One (1)or more sheets not lager than 24'x 36", showing the following information: B. Name of project/development; C. Location of project/development by street address; ✓ _ _ D. Location map; including area within one (1)mile of site; E. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; ✓ _ F. Name and mailing address of engineer/architect; ✓ G. Date of plan preparation; ✓ G. North point indicator; ✓ _ H. Location of municipal and,extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; _✓ _ _ I. Listing of specific land uses being proposed; ✓ J. Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; K. Total number, type, and density per type of dwelling units; L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel; M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (Floor Area Ratio,FAR), with a breakdown by land use; ✓ _ N. Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel(s) and total site, including the following: PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 2 i • III (1) Percentage and square footage of building coverage; (2) Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking; - y (3) Percentage and square footage of public street r/w; �j (4) Percentage and square footage of open space and/or landscaped area; ✓ _ (5) Percentage and square footage of"active recreational use" area; ✓ _ _ 0. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest,handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking, with typical dimensions of each; _ P. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals,unless differently permitted by the Planning Director; Q. Watercourses, water bodies and irrigation ditches ; R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; J S. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,, including existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than 2'/2", by species; T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; _ ,L U. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active ✓ recreational use; V. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks, recreational areas, school sites, and similar uses; W. Location of existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; , X. Maximum building height of all structures; Y. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial, collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the development, notations of proposed ownership,public or private, should be included where appropriate; _ Z. Existing zoning; AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences,walls, and other landscaping; ✓ _ _ BB. Proposed signage,with locations and illustrative examples; YES NO N/A CC. Adjacent site information: -Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 3 i proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200' of the i proposal, exclusive of public r/w at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: (1) Land uses and location of principle structures; ✓ (2) Densities of residential uses; _ (3) Existing trees and major features of landscape; (4) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals,unless differently permitted by the Planning Director ✓ (5), Traffic Circulation System; DD. Supplemental vicinity map: ■ Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one (1) mile showing: (1) Zoning districts; ✓ (2) Location of municipal boundary lines; (3) Traffic circulation system; (4) Major public facilities including schools,parks, trails, etc.; EE. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership; FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the City Planning Board and Zoning Commission certification of approval of the site plan, including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria.of Section 18.54.100; _ _ ✓ GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on the site plan; 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements YES NO N/A A. Architectural elevations: Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; B. Landscape treatment: A general landscaping plan indicating: (1) Treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces; (2) All existing vegetation with identification of trees by sizes of species; ✓ (3) Specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction; ✓ (4) The scale shown on plant materials; ✓ C. Utility plans: The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: (1) Sanitary sewers; ✓ _ _ (2) Storm sewers; PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL UQ Aug 2000 4 (3) Water; — — (4) Electric; ✓ — — (5) Gas; ✓ _ — (6) Telephone lines; ✓ _ _ (7) Fire hydrants; (8) Trash collection areas; ✓ — — D. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including �. the proposed width, treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed; _ E. Physiographic data, including the following: (l.) A description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping; (2) A map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch �1 showingthe 100'year flood lain for each period as designated in Y P P � the design criteria as established by the City; (3) A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table, fluctuations, and a statement of site suitability.for intended construction and proposed landscaping; F. Drainage plan: Preliminary drainage report and calculations and/or plan, including: (1) All watercourses on the property or which are located within 200' of the property,must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated; — (2) All drainage, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, i spillways,reservoirs, etc.,which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated; ✓ — (3) All irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown; (4) All required on-site detention areas, including notes indicating the .approximate area and volume of the facility; — — (5) All plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for the storm drainage from the property, including the name of the drainage-way (where appropriate), the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage-ways, etc.), and any downstream restrictions; ' (6) Existing and/or proposed grading plan; — — G. Temporary facilities plan: 1 A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model home's, PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 5 sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; H. Preliminary subdivision plat: If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; I. Traffic impact analysis: At the discretion of the Public Service Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: (1) Land use and trip generation- a table of each type of land use, the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used (daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation; (2) Traffic graphics showing: (a). AM peak hour site traffic; (b) PM peak hour site traffic; _ (c) AM peak hour total traffic; (d) PM peak hour total traffic _ (e) Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown / separately); ✓ (3) AM and PM capacity analysis: An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial, collector-collector, and arterial-collector intersections within one (1)mile of the site or as directed by the Director of Public Service; ✓ _ ( ) Report ort format shall be as follows: (a) Trip generation-using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual; (b) Trip distribution; (c) Traffic assignment; (d) Capacity analysis; (e) Evaluation; (f) Recommended access plan, including access points, ✓ modifications and any mitigation techniques; _ (5) Additional Analysis Criteria: Appropriate clearance intervals shall be provided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for .each cycle And pedestrian overpasses shall not be at intersections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be 4' per second with a minimum PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 6 "WALK"time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three (3)through lanes in each direction, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential intersections with signals will be placed on `/4 mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service "C" shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level'of Service"D"be accepted for site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall operate at Level of Service"C"; if Level of Service "E" is the result of the study, then alternatives of providing Level of Service"D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally, the design year will be approximately fifteen(15) years-following construction. (6) Summary analysis explaining: (a) The proposed access points for the project, their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation; (b) Future off-site road improvements for access, which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is responsible for their completion; _ (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets; _ (d) How traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the PUD; (e) Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the / development, if used; ✓ J. Additional studies and plans: The City Planning Board and Zoning Commission or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed PUD; particularly if the development's compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; 4. Reproducible Copy Requirements YES NO N/A In addition to the above document, Site plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant shall 1 submit the following for review purposes: A. One full size rolled(not folded)mylar of all plans and renderings; ' B. One 8`/z"x 11" clear film reduction of all plans and renderings for / — — reproduction and overhead projector use. * Reference to 18.54.060"Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements"of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance (7/02/90) Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or$4.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable industrial or commercial (includes professional business offices) floor area. Minimum fee after refund: $500.00 PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 7 Adjoiners to COS 1177C Campbell=Lucin Jay Lyndes COS 1177 Remainder Tract 600 Indian Trail 120 fin 2551 Billings, MT 59105-2702 City of Bozeman C-38-A, Drum Lummon Addition, 43 fin 2137, Administration Dept. and P.O. Box 1230 Tract 12, Drum Lummon Addition, 141-355 Bozeman, MT 59771 Bozeman Deaconess Foundation Tract 3, COS 2047, 139 fin 879 901 Highland Boulevard and Bozeman, MT 59715 Tract 13, Drum Lummon Addition 136-164 G:\c&h\00\00220\oflice\Adjoiners.wpd _ r CERTIFICATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners of record and each purchaser under contract for deed of property within 400 feet of the property located at Tract C, COS.1177C, is a true and accurate list of names from the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder records and mailing addresses from the Gallatin County Assessor Records. .I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. December 14, 2000 ature Date G:\c&h\00\00220\office\Adjoiner Cert.wpd r --q- �-affl .. . .. .-.r 111 FL.I .U H S .... r CARNEEGI_y.`^.f 1.'-'� 71 r ... 1J 'R-"- a Al R-0- Rs / I MOGPITAt v 1'' R 3 A I R->3A y' _: BP U R. 4 - r_ R-1 RS A. RS r R R AS Rs: AS PI . I is �'✓ ___�1 AML Wroject Number: ENGINEERING AND lazor SURVEYING, INC. Project Name, &M-157 1 •Civil Engineering •Structural Engineering •Land Surveying Date: Fig By: 2415 W.Main Street,,Suite 1 (406)587-1115 Bozeman,Montana 59718 -Fax:(4.06)587-9768 Subject- Page: 4 Aant, 472 75-2 4 -----------. ........ ............. L .............. .......... ........... ...... ...... ........ ----------- r . .......... -------------- .............. ................................ T.................... /2 3 1 ......................Aet ........... ................. ...... ............. _ _ _ - ................ ...............- .......... ....... D A2 q�n --------------- ....... .......... .. ......... ......... ............. .......----------- ............................. ............... Detention Pond #1 c = 0.737 A = 3.14.65 acres release = 0.8225 cfs Storm Storm Runoff Release Required length(min) len th hrs Intensity Q future Volume Volume Storage 5 0.083333 3.218458 7.463508 2239.052 246.75 1992.302 10 0.166667 2.05106 4.756347 2853.808 493.5 2360.308 t 15 0.25 1.575865 3.654384 3288.946 740.25 2548.696 20 0.333333 1.3071 3.031126 3637.351 987 2650.351 25 0.416667 1.130622 2.621878 3932.817 1233.75 2699.067 30 0.5 1.004268 2..328867 4191.961 1480.5 2711.461 35 0.583333 0.908519 2.106829 4424.341 1727.25 2697.091 40 0.666667 0.832989 1.931677 4636.025 1974 2662.025 45 0.75 0.771596 1.789309 4831.135 2220.75 2610.385 50 0.833333 0.720523 1.610871 5012.614 2467.5 2545.114 1 i; i. 100 800 IT7: J4T/ o . 40 co90 700 80 600 ' 70 _ 500 �1 d 0 0 nz 80 YI / c 2 50 IL 300 a� U C3 40 200 I CD 0 cu O L -� 100 O 6 30 ~ 0 20 1 10 0 Figure 2-1 overland Flow Travel Time 2-10 Sect Number: ENGINE E W. VG AND SURVEYING, INC. Project Name: 9 Civil Engineering s Structural Engineering a Land Surveying Date: 12-13 Fig By: 2415 W.Main Street,Suite 1 (406)587-1115 1 Bozeman,Montana 59718 -Fax.:.(4.06)587-9768 Subject: - A04,0Aa4,4. Page: --J ........... IL 4 /A + 4 T— Ji I'K 1" .......... ............... E6 VK w J .......... ............ ..........I .......... ........... .................— ............. .......... _J ...................... ........... ........... ------- .......... .......... ............ ........... ........... .......................... ........... ....... ........ a .......... ................. ......... ............... .................... ----------- - -------- ............ J -__ .......... ----___--- Detention Pond #2 c = 0.737 A= 4.2762 acres release = 1.0143 cfs aStorm Storm Runoff Release Required length(min) len th hrs Intensity Q future Volume Volume Storage 5 0.083333 3.218458 10.14316 3042.948 304.29 2738.658 10 0.166667 2.05106 6.464036 3878.422 608.58 3269.842 15 0.25 1.575865 4.966432 4469.789 912.87 3556.919 20_ 0.333333 1.3071 4.119403 4943.284 1217.16 •3726.1'24 r 25 0.416667 1.130622 3.563221 5344.832 1521.45 3823.382 30 0.5 1.004268 3.165009 5697.016 .1825.74 3871.276 35 0.583333 0.908519 2.863252 6012.829 2130.03 3882.799 >� 40 0.666667 0.832989 2.625214 6300.515 2434.32 3866.195 45 0.75 0.771596 2.431732 6565.675 2738.61 3827.065 50 0.833333 0.720523 2.270771 6812.31.2 3042.9 3769.412 1 ;Y 800 100 O Olei. h N O co .: 90 �. 700 , o 0 80 600 a9 r 500 70 _ 400 80 u- 3 0 0 50 200 , 40 ca - O r 100 O 6 30 ~ p -JO z3.2 0 20 ■ ' 10 0 Figure 2-1 Overland Flow Travel Time 2-10 D N D �° D d O 3 _ X Z LV O N .3 v N N; X m Z m Z X owe 2 .m Z X;x L m X X x :CHURCH J :�A'`��• Y6�a� < `O O c°°a �i I �a�.: U; O O CX� m m a ro Z Z X x �� y m In m m D"..1•d 99� 'T 9q O 0 - m X X X X SN O C•O^ ...::::...:....:..:�.....�....__,..a..:•._.`..; ..... :,..WALL'ACE-.:' .....:.. m Z ��yti�d��a`V c 0d O O 3 m 4 �ba ...^ AB Z Z tiTN N X o h < m Cm O O a `�/ Z O ~ ~ d 1•h X °X m m m R x < o a a • ° N�4 ��� �/o e o f g4 c I 'I c • o ti � � z., , o � o� Z ^' a yp8d ;r... m ga. m zi g m � a C c � 1 1` N O Z X I _ CORPORATE LIMITS Q C�7 � m c May `- yam•/ ' - Galatin Count SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND �. REVEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) We�e1d Control VistfKt (Revised November 1999) ' I Projected date for preliminary Plat application 12-1�'00 Date Plan received OCT 19 2000 Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board. This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board, this plan must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or appointed Representative in cooperation with the agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. , A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Cooperator: G(1MP6-e-R L�6I1n !--•�.�. (i(Print F II Name and/or Name of Company) j—r t l �.F�(aCl�� ri\If�r f�(�� 1.,�K'JJ1LIt11 5-A,i15 (i42L05gt9-DUO (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2. Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: Legal Description: 5E 1/4, c5W 1/4, Sec. -c-� T. _N& R. If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel Pit/Etc: r-oC+ 11`-3'7C 3. Land Use (Please check the appropriate box( ) (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop X Other ❑ Please explain r (b) Future Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes El"' No ❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Wee0 Management Plan of and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes [ No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator een Informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes No ❑ j 7. Has the Cooperator been informed oft a relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes ( No ❑ I 901 N. Black Bozeman, MT 59715 (406)582-3265 f B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes ® No ❑ If yes, list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s) /ats*lr 7. 9 ar-PeS Gc.r�4 �i��i7-e'G /�, /�i�izcus 7�cwo�.e� 7i e GC47lC'�. CGHudla h f�ii S7"/� - Sca��e� ��oGr7`f }4 X - less (Gallatin County no)dous weeds are fisted in section III of No;dous Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development! disturbance of the property: Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property, please outline these infestations on a map of'the area/Ior theq subdivision plat ................ Gb'etit/ Lu / i/7!ia�1 4e.r7/A A�Ooi.?5. p rle'ss�1 ■ 3. Please complete the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Chemical Control: I (a.f sy *Chemical Name aco�l Rate /czfoc_� Chemical Name 114 Rate /h(-1 o *Timing and method of treatment(s): c AeP4 It-4ar 5,-e :j ltioT'(.if A a1--wLvITC e'Bbte#d"aC /kls7�9. (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: *Methods of weed control *Timing of control method(s): *Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (c) Biological Control: *Biological control agent(s) Timing of the release(s) of the Bio-control agent(s): Weed control method(s) used to control weed spread while insects establish .............................. •Weed control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor • C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS ' 1. Are there land(s) already disturbed or that will be disturbed on the property? Yes© No[] If yes, explain s U 7. a Garr 2. If the answer was (YES) to question 1 above,what method(s)will be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed argas.(seeding, planting, sod, etc.) r�kJ ayec. spa-c_e- ai-ras Sa SegvdiI-i IA. �e 3. If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: Rate Type S o,-J Rate s., Type ,Rate 4. If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used: Type Rate Type Rate 5. Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate cultivation date(s) 4 Approximate seedirig/sod date(s)` - O Approximate fertilizer date(s) NOTE: For revegetation recommendations contact the Gallatin County Conservation District(Natural Resource Conservation Service). % • D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS NOT APPROVED ❑ RECOMMENDATIONSThe Gallatin County Weed District approves the submitted Weed Management and Revegetation Plan with .the following recommendation: Recommendation One: Cooperator will initiate .weed...control measures on ' that portion of the property that will not be under disturbance in the Spring of 100.1 . Cooperator will contact and inform the Weed District when the control measures are completed. 1 (Signature of Weed Board Cha' Re resents e) (Signature f Cooperator) Supervisor, Gallatin Co. Weed District (Date) (Date) WMP-1 -71Fw Crj 1 {F 1 2�! �g p e } 4 ::"::rn�:<.:-: .Pu•n..c-�ww,l,c�.q,l.,�r '• I I�,���"mw �� q :. s 's �:� ;•' d�eel u `I �1y ®fig �"�C;I "T: MV �.-'�l ' e r� €y � � ;::• ,�' '` 's��,rr7t M. ''1°,j ntirna, 4_;__"'�.i..�` ylllrr IIHI1- � A ',�'.✓�11C�,` gIP ���6 .�SP a;�j I I'• � I I. "'YYY in1 1' I'L�I fi'a �o ��% 4!�'I ' .` VA L____�___ 1' 1 i 2 if !�'• t ®►� SS I I Q L"� '' mot ' r G.'�b.Ca] "IS 1 ' I� it 1' �! . SaR j��m 5!12llm fur, 1 ' 6" 3 1 ''b'• a ;'\;�\'Y,,y � Ir D.�/��'����� ' r II 1 SPY f*1 qpq-4, POT '� �,��, F�� y�--�� —�: Lam_--- — __ __ .•� �/Y' yGlp './1 or a&}i P '� ,ly I: •'.•J',!1om +- ''ui'f A'__'_1` I :'�L'9 C�Y1 .P i ''; - � 1' 9 - ��li'L � hY Ir F...:'e.' -•�:�� i ! •��"�''" .�j'I 'i i p`'`f � lit � :.w' '.. I.. I�( 'py " �.J.•xJL 1 c•�,1—1 �9 9 \- ///f •+ 47 .^.hJx.z - nm I.r��„�A �� �i �1•'L I:xu•..,rr uvL'w''zu; i.Nt . � 4a s nft— PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE DATED: DE'CEMBER 14, 2000 27 3 3 9 1 089 00559 ORDER NO. : 1-65090 i . TO: C & H ENGINEERING (2) CC: C & H ENGINEERING ATTN: MATT COTTERMAN 2415 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 1 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY To the County of. GALLATIN and the City of BOZEMAN in Montana CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, with its principal office in the City of Chicago, Illinois, and duly authorized to insure titles in Montana hereby certifies that from its examination of these public records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the real estate described in Schedule A hereof, as of the 30TH day of NOVEMBER , . 2000at 5 o'clock P.M.,the title to the described real estate was indefeasibly vested in fee simple of record in: Merle H. Adams, Jr. and Deborah K. Adams; Michael E. Tate; Gary F. Lusin, LLC ' and Campbell, LLC as their respective interests appear of record. subject only to the objections, liens charges,encumbrances and other matters shown under Schedule B hereof. The maximum liability of the undersigned under this certificate is limited to the sum of$ 200.00 This certificate of title is made in consideration of the payment of the premium by the subdivider of the land and for the use of the County and City above named. 1 ' Issued by: Y AMERICAN LAND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMPANY By: P. 0. Box o Bozeman, Montana Montana 59715 587,- 5 63 s , ' �';• ATTEST: Pres' ent Authorized Signatory Thomas A. Cahill Secretary PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE(MONTANA) Reorder Form No.9113 Schedule A Page 2 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00559 Order No.: 1-65096* ' c Being the legal description of the real estate covered d by this certificate. The following described parcels of real estate: Tract C of Certificate of Survey No. 1177C, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, and located in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 6 East, P.M.M., and being further described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said Tract C: thence westerly 269°51'30" assumed azimuth from north, 1097.34 feet along the south line of said Tract.C: thence northerly 000°06'31" azimuth 212.87 feet along the west line of said Tract C; thence easterly 079'16'14" azimuth 109.65 feet along the west line of said Tract C; thence easterly 079°24'12" azimuth 495.61 feet along said north line; thence easterly 081-025'05" azimuth 180.05.feet along said north line; thence easterly 087000'37" azimuth 323.73 feet along said north line; , thence southerly 179°53'16" azimuth 365.47 feet along the east line of said Tract C,to the point of beginning. SCHEDULE A Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) ' I I i I Schedule B Page 3 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00559 Order No.: 1-65090 Being all of the estates, interests, equities, lawful claims, or demands, defects, or objections whatsoever to title; and all easements, restrictions, liens, charges, taxes (general, special, or inheritance, or assessments of whatever nature), or encumbrances; and all other matters ' whatsoever affecting said premises, or the estate, right, title or interest of the.record owners, which now do exist of record. ' 1. Except all minerals in or under said land including, but not limited to, metals, oil, gas, coal, stone and mineral rights, mining rights and easement rights or other matters relating thereto, whether expressed or implied. 2. Taxes for the second half of the year 2000 and subsequent years. Taxes for the first half of the year 2000 are paid. Taxes for the second half of the year 2000 are due and payable and will be delinquent if not paid on or before May 31, 2001. Included within the General Taxes are Gallatin Conservation District, Gallatin County Water Quality District and Bozeman Planning Board. (Taxes for the year 2000--first half- $788.94, second half- $782.61. Parcel No. RGH23190) 3. Special assessments levied by the City of Bozeman for 2000-2001 under Receipt No. First Half: jDistrict No. 8000 Street Maintenance. Installment - $1.,354.19. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. Installment - $276.54. " First Half Installment is paid. Second Half: District No. 8000 Street Maintenance: Installment - $1,354.18. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. Installment - $276.53. (continued) ' Schedule B Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) Schedule B Page 4 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00559 Order No.: l-65090 Second Half Installment is due and will be delinquent if not paid on or before May 31, ' 2001. No liability is assumed for any special assessments, snow removal, sewer assessment or garbage assessment not set forth in the Assessment Books of the City of Bozeman. 4. Matters disclosed on the proposed plat as follows: a a. Certificate of Dedication The above described tract of land is to be known and described as NORTHERN ROCKIES SUBDIVISION P.U.D., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana: and the lands included in all roads, avenues, alleys, and parks or public squares shown on said plat are hereby granted and donated to the use of the public forever. The roadways , dedicated to the public are accepted for public use, but the County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the same. The owner(s) agree (s) that the County has no obligation to maintain roads hereby dedicated to public use. The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person or firm, whether public or private, providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas cable television, water or sewer service to the public, the right to the joint use of an easement for the . construction, maintenance, repair and removal of their lines and other facilities, in, over, under and across each area designated in the plat as "Utility Easement" to have and to hold forever. b. 10 foot wide utilih' easements c. 25 foot wide utility and Stormwater Drainage Easement. 5. Right of way for, or any portion falling within Ellis Road running across the above described property as disclosed by Certificate of Survey No. 1177-C. 6. Right of Way Easement to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, recorded June 6, 1977 in Film 37,page 1830, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 7. No Search has been.made for water rights and un atented mining claims, and liability , thereon is excluded from coverage of this certificate. TC/CB , END OF SCHEDULE B Schedule B , Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) SURVEY REOLIESTED BY OWNER 10 CREA.7E 7 LOTS. )NELIAWINARY FLATOI" OWNERS: JOHN H. GREINER. KAREN S. GREINER -5e.the 1nda,v;d pope,h,e-do he,eb-, ce,lie,Until a he.,-a,.j 1. be sobdidej and ? I. 111 d into late,hie ck,.1011L,and "-eye.and 0.11 Nifan,and decti,ati-,c, ha-by the plot hi, t" d,"atai .,I of .m. 1.0: GARY F, ILICIN 1,L,I,: C_WPSELL, 1,L.C, LKC-Erljo NORTHERN SU9LW*Vk'1310fJ I, U.D. (P) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH C.C,Itieicolc of SNo. 1177C.ucco:d;,q to the raot thetcaf,an fi!�am of Tcon.1 in the cefle,of LOCATED IN THE -5-V 11/4, 5-311y 1114- 10F SEC. 8, T. .2) S., R, 6 E. lh� ". .1 a, 0t) MEASURED DISTANCE Cc?AZI�IAUTH -1d R�rt .1 Carroty,I"I'Mued.and"ea"Td;n fie S�.Iheesl 011. the se.0,1 ,It, Secii-,a.I-n.h. '.2 5-ih. P.M..M.,and Lta ludhv dc..,.bzd a, r I the S�Ialheall cel-el of eC;.j Tract C: F P.M.M. FOUND 0` I NO 5/8 INCH RECAP %vnH 1 1/2 INCH GALLA TIN COUNTY, A4'OIVTAAIA nc, ?ET �!,30-.td O:heath flan north. IOR7.3.feel.!am the .Ih fine I-aid 71 C: ALUMINUM CAP OR AS NOTED tInce naiiheoy ijElEr�s'3t-a:iaoth?%?.!l2 reel alone the aril at laid tract I line ac C: e 1 1 -bwlll 109.125 Frei along the north I—of said I,o r: a SET 5/5 INCH RESAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH in. ,e!A?97T S' a. el 1 e.aa[."y 079.2'.1-- .hh 495.51 1, ciang old_in line: PLA SMC CAP MARKED (C&H 99S18ES) :hence 051*25*05' 1=h I eo.L 5 red along cold n-th ght: The,,enslerh 067 ED 37'arlmoll,323.73 fee,clung suitHh line, BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORT.H: THE hence 53kt.)e!fy 1;7 53' Id*t-L'noth 365.47 feet alanq the east line of sdd-,,a-t C. I 1' 5 ILJIH LINE OF I I"a.'I of 1:qi.n6xi. ACT C, COS NO. I 77C, BEING 269' 51 p 30" �:0 - 37-51.111 scue,c Ili, 7.E909 acres c,31.124.1 squa,le m.etcia. Subject to vlsUN eoSenents. IN-25`00'00"E) BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZIMUTH SHOWN the above fltcrib-d!,act of sond:5 to be v,and dt. ilo NCRIHERN, ROCKICS SUSOMSION he ijq;z 1?1y of Baztnon.Ehallain Cu.ty.Montana: am I lcm 4 d's in a M!Ittc. alleys and OIL$a, P-h;-too-1.1 h said OW.1.hb,- gee donated.and d.dul, (a the C;ie,., a......for he ose am en joyminI each and Fr.,-c,coop".U... �Icthv public to P,6.ie.dding eg., po", W a, � -�e. ":�� INS lawn. -1., v, ;c.to the public.!h. dgm I. I -Intla:fill and1 of 11,111:1... 'joint reen, tne other in,ove,L-de,old cc,."ech 3 designated on thir�plot as Witty Eace-,n"to bJ:e and to..'N aas� .Vd.ol loo ttl AREA OF L0`FS_._P_!.45_1`S0__FT 1.86,99 ACRES line -in i". PEI, INING AREA - �53.566 SO FT 5.SZIO Ali I Ckatt,al thN-om,of 70(�_- (A John K Caine. va,cn S. (OPEN SPACE,PAPlING AREAS.OFNIVEWAYS) OF WASHENUTON • 'OJ:.qy Or INNC IOTAL AREA m 335.017 SO FT .6909 ACPES PARCEL 'y before me c.-1— 1, on. a,m%oOqaca1cd J.- H. anal S.O'ein", I.Nit',Ptjbd��ft�fWt State.1 �,dsh'Inc""" 11-a.11 Ilislei. .me I.be it..cli'son.whoa.!are so bd to(k, W�In,I and_44dqed 3Mn r- that th, ..coated the sum • ch, in W;ned��helrial-I have he?t.ht.le n,-Y-and and M-ed my C,660 ,at lht day and ye., in P, ce'0;,alt f"'It'c_ ZONED BF ravdlnq of PU2LK7 C), y�t PARCEL - - - - - - - - - Cited this-day of CARY F.LUC04,L.L.C. etas-C-A Gj,y r.Luc;..D,tsia,ht SIAor ltcq�ml, cxL-nN ZONED Sle or UNDEVELOPED 0"rids a?Of in-vat 200. bel- I.-Ike ap-,,d C.•y a. Loz'�. L Stale - hi-i I ai CARY r.LUC(K L me ICNalu'y Puadic Clannpan,. ,'.name km-1. -d.1-ht-a Un�i;ld Uatialy be the person c is sea io,j 't, an 10 Na the i.ji:,ment am acknowsedoej to n,e that he eseceed the some,to,=4 an be..r. Of sold Lla�itad -cisxeon th d and a q-F, Wbflii, 6�llnryah... at hand and.,r-.d of sh I a a,a ZWED K, 'P1 PUBLIC FOF IN.,SIATE or monTA.w CAMPSELt.L.L.C. Cited inic day.1 (ht) LOT 5--e, 4 John D.C-pt'O" el L bee: 'etog =1--Z I I WCl,�, -__ STATE OF 11:rANA COUNTY Or CALLON -.9 On t-dS _altj John D.Co bell.;dt"I of CWiPEELL.LA.E.. E' _j - do rL O�hn Year M -cof.li,.1 notary Public A) ACF`L tell Ttai�'. IA'alTano.ite'tom,,y 07 i act Os_1 CP 1.1?" Qnt Ind Ict-1cl Seed to 11 that h,eevl,�d the so-(a,and zn b,kalf (said Unnii.d so r, a, �illy Company,Lto I* be the person h=3a @ is on SPACE _-1 LI,,;Zl`y Cla.ac,%, 1..11,�htf�-I I—teleuntla let my hond am offi-ed my olficial-.1 the des end yea: :,,)S a pco.hes ;Ih;.;nsl_ (sqgl,�w%eu I - - -"" ; sdinq of "thle c!'ziNlall fi,si at..,-illen. - - - TPR077 NLI-�y PUZILK: IYE SWC or POUT&4� v co ues vrnn a'- T Cl� CE:F?71FIC.;.E 0 F --Z Li-:?V EYCD R Z 4 8 s 1.Va,"A.Chilhlarl.F�cf 119in't., 2518-ES.do 11,11a,cedify that I I = $$!-ad E Lond Sul-1.1 No. _/ W. lael, - - _- 2 \LOT 7 a'{-:'lied N I z000,and Mae.-?'W-.I.RvfVrYcd NORIH-P":��MES SUEDlySION P.U.0., If a'�,N.5 sc.F, L -:'tied the SO-111 11s dh-- on the.nV41q and.1 dtlelabid.in monlon Q cal. q, LOT 2 0.77.4E)AMC I 1 4 I"g Act.section.15-3-lo. lh3� ,52-6-�II.Cl- ..a I-, • so r 0 day of 21CL 3 2 LOT 1 f-------3 t \ \ \\ 1 "-'4 a----'�-� ( y N:b {L^t7iE5 ca .3.3, kl.�k Ch-di.- "as tkc�x 27 Lana AegiTtml'ran'NI. L------ '�E FI.TIFICATE: OF 01 P.E:C70R OF PUSLIC SERVICE NSe 5!tE of PON"S.1\4c..C:iy O.� -go.anna". Lie lanv, do he,gbv corl;fy t,pt the accompalreri"q Out #op her atell dioll,rylled am hot fcltnd (he some t.ce,nfa:n,zl,the lc�. Rp"-s it.am hvel ccepla Easement(DK�11 dectic.lh.-letathe Citv of 8.to, the pahI;c01 anny and It lan"s ilan the pial as -ec drc,I.das Do d We day of ' �m n iaw.,•i-� T rh= a - - _ ,.4,t^ a..:a - - \'::' hldn;^ �[,-�l!e vr r-.-..I .'ne 'Clai 233. 0 2n7i 33 Doe-.tari Publi� Se,,icu 81,57?2 City.1 B.,ze,nan. Mahlona TRACT 3 '09".8, E OF R!Z:I_E.cSE OF SANITARY F�ESTRIC71<)NS c-I SE - Trutt C. COS W..1177C 5,�,-PIR"11ith I !/� [SsC-3'-30-y,(P) Fad 9 C.11.1 Mu'l-a.III= Fie,A".. At—COP(71'L") a.. ;1 the I ZONED P-2 lachri POINT 13F INNING a,.l 11%,aidad ,N),;c1po I't`ue!to,the .FRI, of"al., ."d I ON CD A-5 .? am.0id 1)`1.once,the S-0- UNDEVELOPCO thi, 11-.1 abject 1.lant.1,WO-s. D.I�d IN,- 11,of OF CON: e of p"t"5;e'' w C;iy i 6:,,an.Mania- E: F' E:rIC1r,l INIF-ROVEtAE:MTS the!'jh,H.Oc:.i!n S.O,e;hl,Ca,r F.Lvc�in,John 0.Connoib tit.and 1.IIL,,L A.Oha.de,a -q;,Id P, -6-ite,11-1e to ploel".,in'Slot..,-Mon.. -he b, ce,lil'NmI 11,.'ES os a Onaphth.1 caocl of the Dat of NOR-MERN ROCKI ;MNISION'P.I.I.O..h-been hnz'�Alcd ino a 'Ah in...P,..d plana and r,ec;ehcaI!.n.: 3.7i'aly Se*a.,".1n,am SIlcll.Wale,Mains and Slcecl. $I'll 1--av111.c aortic,of the 114on,all,on -I a.... drainage;,nerti an EM,Si,efl. Iht 'ut,cf.vide, ht-ty-a-Is up;n-1 defects in these;ma,nts for u ae'lund of One year ftom 1h;3 dole. f The-aehld,. 91,p ;an of as ie.bhc:-f1.s'fl-P11-19 to Uhl,ORv.01 e,and the My_1;an a all death,;nf,1sItVre !%lbieat to the laeve i-eiketedrwliy. Ih;,- Jay.1_.2L'O--. CARY F.LUCIN.L.L.C. lt:nlon- No.9SIBES _y: I.Loch, ,ts;ce.o CAWP221.t.U.C. oi,dor 0,ai so: -n 3 C'e"t, John D. 1;dent Scale In Fee, oFcdd c. iv D .0 _q - ce Ca,jdjL�County,CIF t!onjum.do h..elv Inal the acconn-,-g J K-s surer has b:zn cut, end that.111 t-es4 S'.10 In ;dfie'a I I J! s-.1,sjcd an.!40edthat'old to C,R11.,f101 h.vo C11-laid. �rre.- Doted t. der.1 D';,o!y I........ .I Gallatin Cnly tj NOI 10-,CALE —Van cli,l-and & M.C311.0n County. "n't'a.che'a'b' c."N' that In`.-lam t 'e lov:no .d5 filed in y cffice.1--- .*Cia,"_1�4. th!,s---- ocy Of -------------- 200-alto, ced Paul.-cf Met:.Race lecajdF V thP Cl ell'and Reazeae,Collati, n.., DATE PREPARED: 12/11/00 0.411 ------------ Dewly 01�'and R...ldr, #00220(tvii), � � w r .� � � �r �r �r r r ■r � � � r air � I • � I MORTHERN RCKI PROFESSIONAL CENTER PRELIMINARY RUD. PLAN z s nuts � . Fnd 5/1'P.eb«plin CCNNECT AIMIARY SEKEP AND WAIEP. PARCEL 1 AN,m.C.(PI•d•) TO EMSTN&MAINS A,COMSIM APARDIX"MIS 1 1;r _ COS NO'C-38-A LITE OF MONTAT'IA - � ruTEIRE ca+cRnE case a C7NIER ZONED BP �- •' _ AND SOEWkif(107 A PAR,OF tH5 PROJECT) UNDEVELOPED SVPN17 13 / Fne 5/B nW«^{p7 c) f. c ;; "y• rr,� iy` l `5e:rFEcy;?:.:%I! - _ PARCEL '2 COS N0. C-.B-A • {{/2 0 • A«^cv t f�'r .•.I •` t? i r ti eie /J ZONED BP - �' UNDEVELOPED / NEW SSLM-,- - FNlim rite OF SOZEMAN FCCREATION COMPLEX Pkl ar DRUM LUNMON ADDIIIO,V •r + yj'•"1 ; � ' y,�•�` �Y - l- `" \ �- s u 1 / / A �tnZONED PLI uonte/l ::i• k rvty L_s, -'` - - _ r \l \ '` r :A�. •) �' = t-4SI`� -+� e � 1 [p197NG SSS9,-z7, / W&BQl E rL..>.o _��_I''1 // .{' 9-,�6.Yq.$.(R1 / Tkl` .,~^ti' E.G§„•�;t1.`>��l.ry"T:.. -v{�::•::• ,?•.rcr r� Pc i�.(P.N. ^^I(_ oa L,•t,rr K; a.Jt:•Lam•.-- _' I x/ LO \ TOP OF NORTH SIDE O 8q 570FET STORM a 0M7 rJ .rn 1l1111 ELEVATpON-6 .6 . Eq�a6a 1 \(City OF BOZEMAN DATUM) •-"y,•,P�r"'.L� .a)r•r-'•���Ci c' J-^�• _- q f. 5 \ _ ,\ I WATER VALVES -'- +.. ....�'•;z•1r "••:"+-,T,t:4J1.. ��� "= •�' 0"- 7A F `: ,•-rf..' OT 3 OPEN ,f Is +. �ar` mow'., .;.•: � �^'�_ � � � a[ Isla, � s.r:BEU•t3o aTao 7f r Sp�E 2 '47.� 47, / I \ fir_ �-y��^c�.�•••�•..in ��l�,rusl�., ' ��,����,t: �, ter• "'-��'r��..,No` as<cl l _ l�?=:J ------------------ I I � � C (,LS?(}."�1 _� _o''\ . I P If•.?!-]t..iE. Y� ..J. 1 ��. 'o��{jO�P',•i�TCt',��'-�/� - Ol.iA \�• I \I � `/7 �L� � I Y•0 t j -r r'_ _�U6S ���/T �e l I^ �l •- 0 .8 (61B r 12.9 !n 'GRAM 515.•, L_ _ -- - J (��9 1,&D 4 U (CD I)'r I I � r l` ( 1 1 4 u/_ m Hm-W4n.. i1 (e6.951. c _w I I 1 Si: , tS I I SOP:IC l 6( ' 8 I�. v J I /r/ �\ ``R l (PA..) /l5. r �/ - nry ._i� _�, (6B.BS) ,� ,� \ \ 6 \ ., 110.•9`. �- t 'S11 L .�, pE 6 7 Eo + 7� I �,,,� I I II- ISPiTCE , `0 � � \ _rf I \�\` � � afC0.' (fi0.i5)y' - (6(6il65Y i J y / !I / I r S t 1335.017 y_r. C• '\ ""/ fw�s I � t .:9. ( � 7 I s0 VT i (aE.) (39 ; DEPCONE H Id. .E60.61 I �lb.,r ,All / / // I s4 �,--~ � I y 5) 3 nl diB. \ \Fs? 0 1 I • A I / j I S-,6A I .5 ^'T .•• - 11,T41.7® F 7 L7 / Q a � (,E j j ^H i j /LO 1 � (�e) 11( ) 1 1 - F.r l�•� 7a� e) ( )`'xi) �` \ 1 � t l 44 � DR-2 N ti F+I __ I I - �1 - � 1.65} )•\, \ I E 7\c 1 .5 ,V ( E+ n1. � � I11 ��� - 61 r � �/� •-'\.'\, �.ti,.. I6.1° 13 7.21 :�a s) I .( 7s 6 \ ., (�.sL 35) \ Q 5n ) I �.:I' l � �\ - I I. �_ r�3.D I 1 r• , � T / / � / � � � _ a zol, n.) e� _ \ _ \� \ _ SNee1(AMMonr._ fm,343- -- ' _ I BG4'EGAN DEACONESS HOSPoi?.L '� iOW,S{ WO•FIeER OPiK UNES CITY OF 80ZEMAN LIMIITS r�s/B'Rr6w w.;ln W S7 'r` -- sae , Iln ( I ZONED A-S �0 7B95139Oq /?'tam coA(PI'L') vP �a'0Es Iw- i UNDEVELOPED s : e 2\ zor,EO R-? I AREA,TABULATION E- - �I I AREA OF BUILDINCS: 81451.2 50. FT. 1.871 ACRES AREA OF PAVED/CONCRETE SURFACES: 161029.72 50. FT. 3.597 ACRES AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 92335.78 SO. FT. 2.124 ACRES N TOTAL ).REA: 335.017 $D FT 7.6909 ACRES ' ELLIS STREET PARKING TABULATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION FurueE TO BE COf15,FUCTEO REOUL.4R PARKING SPACES, 316 TRACT C.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 1177C HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES b RAY 30 �' R .t0 N! SE 1/4• SW 1/4, SECTION 8. 1. 2 S.• R. 6 E. vICIh,I'r'Y MCP HANDICAPPED 5.5' ' 17 t9.5' 5.5' S OF P.W.M.. CALLA7IN COUNTY, MONTANp COMPACT PARKING SPACES 79 I' 1' IOIAL QARKIHC 403 DG4A .I 2�QPE 3:SLOPC I 3R SLOPE Stop, CiCQ�•_ BENCHMARK T - ----� a�FS 9DEWALK I 9D WALK "0 E� LEGEND 3'BIIUMNOUS SURFACE TOP OF NORTH 57.eoSTORM FEET } COMPACTED TO 97%MARSHALL CUISDE OF 5XIS7WGG CRAVELD ROAD V SURFACE, ATION ELEVATION = 4857.E0 FEET - r PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 6'OF 1 1/2'MINUS CRUSHED (CITY OF BOZEMAN DATUM) - ® NOTIm Scale In feet ( 40 0 CO '� -- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE' BOAS9SCOARSE FAASO COMPACTED- ,. INTEGRAL CURB AND CUTTER AS PER C.0.8'SPEC.0?52B -- AND C.O.B.STD,MAC.Y0252B-,. 12 D t2 OWNER �� I - PROPOSED WATER LINE INSTALL S--OF 6-MINUS PIT RUN MATERIAL ON 2. SIDEWALK AS PER C.O.B.STD•DWG.302529-10 AND§02529. - " PROPOSED HYDRANT COI.IPACTED SUBCRADE(INSTALL CE0701ILE 1 FERTILIZING AND SEEDING AS PEP.C.O.B.SPEC.02221 Scale In Mete" CAMPSELL/LUCIN. L.L.C. AS REO'D BY ENGINEER) (TOPSOIL NO a SEEDING ON CUT S FILL AREAS ON a PROPERTY 9DE OF SDE'NALIC 3499 BRIDGED CANYON ROAD I Ab1D)i PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ) cmiour/nfer a(: r Fool BD'EIAAAI,MI 59715 - '^ /r I 4. CEOTEYILE FABRIC 1NLL EC USED DEPENDING ON 9,C CONDITIONS ` ` !/ DRAINAGE DIRECTION AS REO'D BY ENONEER(LICHI%4EICHT NON-WOVEN CEOTEXTILE I FABRIC CONTECH C-45) ARCHITECT ® PROPOSED STORM DRAIN TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS f BX(rfffE&' (NG A]vD 8.4YLISS ARCHITECTS.P.C. L C,R AGp� -NO PARKING ANYTIME- SIGN t s .��a �C• FI? S, TRACY AVENUE ' PER C.O.B. SrO. DY0.•.N0. 0981P-1 C• SCALE: N75 BOZEMAN. MIT 59715 NOT TO SCALE o Slop STOP SIGN 24I5+tr6l NAin 5'Utet.Stile! Bau•,naa.Moalaaa 697IB (16C)5V1I15•Fac(L66169>-9:d5•cBEtcytaerflyDlEFa1oL11J:E1 DATE PREPARED: 12/15/00 am•a'In r I� � � � � � � � � i � �� � � � � r � i .� . ,�•.�,*s�'� � ��� to ;;;�,;:�;:, _ �� _ ..r...��� -_ ■■gee • � r �■ F Ji ■ rim 'imp ■■ ire !!!■ it r � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � i • • • • .,aS a-.: .:'�.-,a -•:rt>4,...-.�.- •.�s T:�.tew�..+Fa:.t=•�W.• -n�-».. Y,tr:•�,a. ..::,�»:.a-,.s,:r�.'" r-s�w+&• �., t�•w•�'+=` - - - _ a-.- : i� - - -£- "•r2 .k.,'x.-•. .._ ."�' .,`4-}'atK'_.. :•a_.... -___.. ... .... ..t�.�. ...-_.._ .-.-. ..__. ..�`s�a�t6,�.+s�++•-L•aE-�!_s_TH.<ar.=c�`. -�4::.iu.:&.err..'+-+•r,fty-.*-a a--.�-:F�_ -�=�Sa....�.�rt--raL1.- .w-a-.a y t 3'=t: t .i.. - - ems- N rth r Prof_: _ , �_ .. _�=__= _�- .._�v_�_ �_ _i�_�.Y•_ •4s __ 'w._ .. .., ., ..—r.-•�t -may.. _ � - _ _ - essiQna en :erg aVlon _y n a - �t. i a - -t n �. _ _a ,,_.,.�.ire.a,._e':..a�.�?,.,a;,-+.wr44i.,-r+tc-rwtt .. ..,' ,.._.'....-•.yr, _ �-::t.'il�T� - - _ - :,:::� - - .::;' -:;.' - • � ems►_ �s�_Ii■�K, r :,-■ r -- - ��•� „ice�'-:�.s ..,y` ■ ■i ..� , ,``'�, �_ � • ice• �► - � ? �:e� °1 t �® s y ■ � 'e�et h a ■ N ��•.;•.ems'i�•'__� • : is �-S !T' 3A als .•.ti �,0 � _ i Off'tdf�r.,"...; "�!: 't'+i. �± ,' ■ � •• ■ ��'�� • � � -ti ,s.� � ® •. 3_ �192 C: _ ;t:t :..i ® `'sue ■ i� i. aG Iq ■ � d! `;._ ^�i s■,i _i of � �� `'-- - / t� � ` t •nr ewe '_ +�=?'i I�j ■ - _ `�•.� � � � �� �• `;4�.,•e�1�!' od�� � ■•�■� �� Omni �■ �I -� ■ �� �.■r[�■■",� Ss�r"■mi _ ice:�I�i�:;i � .,;;n:� u� _� ■ '2 - � � MUM now � � ��"��Y sh. • �t� ■ r � •, �� '_ -�,n� ■,4, :.i ■ Met TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1 NORTHERN ROCKIES 1 r PROFESSIONAL CENTER Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street r 1 BOZEMAN, MONTANA PREPARED FOR r C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc. r r pN T r PREPARED BY A A(.�`� . ...•••� ROBERT R. MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 36r•VIN ' w - 1001 S.24m Street West#111 =;,�`' .•ae EID Billings, MT 59102 0 '`c,•A••••'E���;�`� r December, 2000 Professional Tragic Operations Engineer#259 r I i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ' INTRODUCTION 1 , SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Streets 3 , Traffic Volumes 5 Traffic Operations 7 Speeds 8 , TRIP GENERATION 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 11 TRAFFIC IMPACTS Traffic Volumes 13 i Capacity Impacts 15 , Safety 18 Pedestrians 18 ' ACCESS & INTERNAL CIRCULATION 18 , IMPACT MITIGATION & RECOMMENDATIONS 20 APPENDIX"A"Traffic Volumes 22 APPENDIX"B" Capacity calculations 23 APPENDIX"C" Speed Study 24 APPENDIX"D"Turn Lane Warrants 25 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE ' Figure 1. Site Location Map 2 Figure 2. Existing ADT& Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 6 Figure 3. Primary Trip Distribution 12 Figure 4. Site Traffic Assignment 14 Figure 5. Existing Plus Site Traffic 16 Figure 6. Off-Site Capacity Impacts 17 Figure 7. Peak Hour Traffic At Site Accesses 19 LIST OF TABLES ' Page 9 Table 1. Trip Generation Northern Rockies Professional Center 8 Table 2. Trip Mode, Trip Type & Net Vehicular Trips 10 Northern Rockies Professional Center i Traffic Impact Study � 1 1 1 � � INTRODUCTION 1 This report summarizes existing conditions,trip generation characteristics,trip distribution,traffic assignment, ' and impact analysis within the structure of a traffic accessibility study. The study was completed for a proposed development to be located in the southeast comer of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street in ' Bozeman,Montana(see Figure 1). The study was prepared for C&H Engineering,who is preparing the P.U.D. documents and site plan for the developers. The property is known as the Northem Rockies Professional Center P.U.D. This development is Tract C.,C.of S. 1177C, located in the SE 1/4, SW 1/4, of Sec.8,T.2 S., R.6E of P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Because of local laws and ordinances pertaining to subdivision idevelopments with potential for traffic impacts on the surrounding street system,a traffic accessibility study is required prior to site plan approval, and building permit approvals. ' Marvin & Associates was retained by C&H Engineering to provide a traffic impact study for the proposed development. Having reviewed the proposed development plan,Marvin&Associates completed an extensive analysis of existing conditions; trip generation and traffic assignment; capacity and safety impacts; and mitigation measures. All of those efforts are summarized within this report. The primary purpose of this stud is to address specific impacts of then w development p ry p rp y p p e with regard to street ' system access and circulation,and to provide mitigating measures to reduce or eliminate identifiable impacts. In addition, the study provides a specific evaluation of planned street system changes and redirection of ' existing traffic created by those plans. Study methodology and analysis procedures within this study employ the latest technology and nationally accepted standards in the area of site development and transportation impact assessment. Recommendations made within this report are based on accepted standards and the professional judgement of the author, with consideration of the traveling public's interests as a primary ' objective. 1 Page 1 F Mai n St. gi E. Babcock ' Q H a E. Olive 3 U E. Curti 9 !d o /nte�state 90 I Ellis HOSPITAL ' oa Northern Rockies Professional Center , Figure 1. Site Location Map Page 2 SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The proposed development would be located in the southeast comer of an intersection involving an arterial ' street(Highland Boulevard)and a local street(Ellis Street)which connects to another arterial Street(Haggerty Lane). The existing property is currently vacant with no existing structures. The proposed development ' would contain 6 lots with building pads ranging in size from 7600 to 28200 square feet. The buildings within this development will be medical offices, which will compliment Bozeman Deaconess Hospital (southwest of the site)operations. ' Within the subdivision, a circulation road which would serve all parking lots for each building would be accessed by two intersections with Ellis Street. The internal circulation road and all parking lots would be channelized with curb &gutter and landscaping. Access to the existing street system would be provided on ' Ellis Street at two locations. The western approach would be located approximately 500 feet east of the Highland Boulevard intersection. The eastern approach would be located approximately 600'east of the west approach and approximately 120'west of the eastern property line. ' EXISTING CONDITIONS iStreets Adjacent and potentially impacted public streets are: Ellis Street, Highland Boulevard and Haggerty Lane. Streets and intersections which are not adjacent to thet ' site, but which could experience some degree of impact are: Highland and Main, Haggerty & Ellis, and v r. rn " yf` Y Haggerty and Main. MIT , Ellis Street is local street with variable width and ' surfacing. At its intersection with Highland (photo right), it has a paved width of approximately 28 feet. The pavement only extends for a distance of ' Page 3 • I approximately 150 feet where it becomes an unimproved dirt road. Within the dirt road section, it has steep grades,sharp curves,and a rutted surface. Ellis also extends west of the Highland intersection. The wester i section of Ellis is a 28' wide paved streets and serves as one of several accesses to Bozeman Deaconess Hospital. Ellis Street is stop controlled at its intersection with Highland Boulevard. ' At the Haggerty Lane end of Ellis (photo left ' 99 ttY (P ), Ellis becomes a 36' wide paved street with curb ' &gutter on both sides. An apartment complex is located near the intersection of Haggerty and , Ellis and it is the only property along Ellis Street that is currently developed. The undeveloped i roadway portion of Ellis extends for a distance of approximately 1500 feet. ' Highland Boulevard is a north-south arterial street which has two travel lanes within a 28'wide(bc-bc) , curbed street section(photo right). It has a 10'wide paved bicycle path on the west side. Highland , Boulevard extends from Main Street on the North, to a point south of Kagy Boulevard, a distance of ' approximately 2.1 miles. It serves as the primary access to Bozeman Deaconess Hospital which is located southwest of the planned development. Highland Boulevard was apparently constructed at half of it future width,since it is apparent that the roadway is not centered within the street right-of-way. It is not known whether the bicycle path is a temporary facility , which will be incorporated into a future roadway expansion or if some other type of facility will be constructed Page 4 , 0 • in the future. Highland Boulevard widens south of the Ellis intersection to provide turns lanes into the main ' hospital entrance. Haggerty Lane is an arterial roadway which serves as f 1 4 f primary access to subdivisions southeast of Bozeman. It has a continuity of approximately 1 mile and is half urban and half rural in nature. Near its intersection with Main Street, it is 44'wide with curb&gutter on each side. At it ' intersection with Ellis Street(photo left), it is 28'wide with no curb&gutter. Ellis is stop controlled at Haggerty and site distance along Haggerty at the intersection is good. Traffic Volumes ' Detailed traffic counts were taken on all area streets in early November of 2000. Hourly count summaries can be found in Appendix°A"of this report. Turning movement counts were taken at four intersections during the peak AM and PM hours, between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. on November 2 & 3, 2000. Figure 2.illustrates these counts along with factored Average Daily Traffic(ADT)calculated from peak hour volumes and automatic recording counts. There were no significant pedestrian movements at any of these intersections,during the counting periods. Only 3 bicyclists and pedestrians used the path at Ellis along ' Highland during the peak a.m.and p.m.counting periods. Trucks were approximately 3%of ADT on Highland, 1%of ADT on Haggerty, 3%of ADT on Main, and 0%of ADT on Ellis. The most significant feature of traffic volumes illustrated in Figure 2 is the directional split on Highland Boulevard. During the peak p.m.hour,60% of the traffic is northbound and 40% is southbound. In the a.m. peak hour the directional split is opposite in idirection with a 39/61% split. 1 ' Page 5 1 0 3 1 0l0 Jl4 1 0 2 0 7-8 AM 4:30-5:00 PM 1 215 7-8 AM 312 552 4:3 0-5:00 PM_ 491 214— —366 575— ---475 127�� fir— 171 163--,, /— 138 90 f— 40 154�� r— 38 96 1t89 161L 0 1 117 21 134 43 17400 F.4f i//) St E. Babcock ?p0 1 Q H 00 c E. Olive ' 3 % E. Curti yd9 9 1 i l I O �� ?Sp lot, \—ADT (TyP) tare 0 I 9 �g0 790p Ellis St- ZO i 1700 00 30 1 0 69 2 HOSPITAL 10 --/ �— 2 7.$ AM 1 0 — 7-8 AMA 0 5 -� fir— 4 Cb �y 1 d 11;011 2 175 4 1 256 'r 37 I 2 ^p`� ) "%— 3 4.30-5.00 PM ' ;2 4 30-5:00 PM 0 fo � tr ti i 6 2 402 Figure 2. Existing ADT & Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes i Page 6 Traffic Operations ' Traffic operations on the surrounding street system during peak hour conditions vary by location. The only intersections that experience noticeable delay is the intersection of Main and Highland and the intersection of ' Main and Haggerty. The northbound lane on Highland at Main occasionally develops vehicle queues that are 15 to 20 vehicles long. These queues disperse rather quickly and do not occur throughout the entire peak p.m. ' hour. That approach currently operates at level of service (LOS) "C"during the peak a.m. and p.m. hours. ' The northbound approach on Haggerty at Main suffers from extensive delay on the left turn movement. Sufficient roadway width exists so that right turn traffic is not delayed by the left turn movement. Existing ' capacity calculations (see Appendix B)indicate that the northbound left turn movement operates at LOS"D"" in the a.m. and LOS F in the p.m. ' Capacity calculations using the HCM rocedure fortwo lane hi hwa s,which is not entire) applicable to urban P Y 9 P 9 Y Y PP street sections, indicate that Highland Boulevard currently operates at LOS "D". However, observations of actual conditions would classify the LOS higher than "D" because there are very few approaches and ' intersections along its length. Traffic appears to flow at reasonable rates of speed between intersections. Therefore,intersection capacity actually controls this street's level of service. Left turn movements on Highland ' at the intersection of Ellis and Highland are calculated at LOS A. The most striking operational character of Highland Boulevard is the fact that the street section provides absolutely no room for stalled or emergency vehicles.-Since this is the main access to the Hospital, it would ' appear that 10' shoulders should be made available to accommodate the most basic concepts of incident management. One incident was observed, during the short data collection period, which involved a stalled ' truck. Long queues formed in both lanes and the driver had to control traffic until help arrived. From the conditions noted, it appears that very serious traffic operation issues could be related to the current typical ' street section on Highland Boulevard. ' Page 7 Speeds Appendix C contains a spot speed summary conducted for northbound and southbound traffic,north of the Ellis Street intersection of Highland Boulevard. This study indicates that 85'h percentile speeds are 41 mph in both ' directions during free flow operations (off-peak hours). TRIP GENERATION ' Table 1. presents trip generation estimates for the Northern Rockies Professional Center with the land use ' assumed to be Medical and Dental Office Buildings, ITE Code 720.Trip generation rates were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Report, Sixth Edition. Rates and total trips are shown for the average weekday and for , peak a.m. and p.m. hours. Table 1. Trip Generation -Northern Rockies Professional Center ' ITE Code 720 - Medical-Dental Office Building Generation Units= 1000 Square Feet Number of Units = 85.7 Average Weekday Rate = T=40.892(X)-214.970 Peak AM Hour Rate = 2.43 80%Enter , Peak PM Hour Rate = Ln(T)=0.921Ln(X)+1.476 27%Enter Number of Trips: Enter Exit Total Average Weekday= 1644 1644 3288 , Peak PM Hour= 56 152 208 Peak AM Hour= 211 53 264 , The total projected average weekday trips (AWT) of 3288 appears to be high compared to existing ADT volumes-of 9700 on Highland Boulevard. However,not all of these trips will be vehicular trips nor will all of the ' trips result in new traffic on the street system. Thus; it is important to know the type of trips to properly evaluate traffic impacts. At this point,it can be assumed that transit would not play a substantial role in modal ' trip exchange. Therefore,minimal trips could be attributed to that mode. Some percentage of trips could also be assigned to pedestrians and bikes. This number would probably not be significant during winter months, ' but could be during summer months. For purposes of analysis, a conservative estimate of approximately 2% of all trips generated was used to account for transit, pedestrians and bike modes. , Page 8 ' 1 • ' Since this development would incorporate six different buildings with some diverse and complementary businesses, trip interchange between businesses will likely occur. It is known that developments which are built adjacent to complimentary facilities, such as those found in shopping centers and office parks, tend to ' capture trips from and to adjacent developments. These trips are part of the total trip generation number, but do not involve trips with origins or destinations external to the site. They are known as"Internal Capture Trips" (ICT). The ITE Trip Generation report contains information used to estimate ICT. The Colorado-Wyoming section of ITE has completed some studies of these factors and have developed some guidelines. A moderate degree of internal trip exchange could be projected for this subdivision with approximately 10%of all trips being Internal Capture Trips. There are also three classifications of trip types related to use of the street system: 1) Primary purpose trips are trips for which the development is a primary destination from any particular origin. 2) Diverted linked trips are trips made to the development as a secondary destination and are diverted from a path between an origin ' and a primary destination. 3)Passerby trips are also trips made to a development as a secondary destination, but the primary trip path is on the adjacent street system, ie. stop on the way home from work. The ITE Trip 1 Generation report provides methods of estimating passerby trips for various facilities. In most cases involving medical offices, passerby trips would be very minimal. In this case, the location of the hospital with respect to the site would tend to increase passerby traffic numbers. Also,this site is located on a commuter route with ' housing developments on one end and commercial developments on the other. This would add to potential passerby trips. It was estimated that approximately 5%of the trips would be passerby trips, even though the potential for higher proportions exists. ' Table 3., on the following page, is a summary of the various trip types that can be expected with this development. The net number of vehicular trips at the site access points is equal total trip generation less ' transit/pedestrian trips and internal capture trips. The number of new vehicular trips using the existing street system would be all of the primary and diverted linked trips or net vehicular trips less the number of passerby ' trips. Thus, on the average weekday, there would be approximately 2750 more vehicles on the surrounding street system and during the peak PM and AM hours there would be 220 and 173 more vehicles respectively. Page 9 i Table 2. Trip Mode, Classification & Net Trips Peak AM Hour: Peak PM Hour: ' Completed Building Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Gross Number of Trips 211 53 264 56 152 208 Ped &Transit(2%) 4 1 5 1 3 4 Net Vehicular Trips 207 52 259 55 149 204 ' Internal Capture Trips 21 5 26 6 15 21 Net Vehicles At Access 186 47 233 49 134 183 ' Passerby Trips 10 3 13 3 7 10 ' Net No. of New Vehicles 176 44 220 46 127 173 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ' There are various methods of determining the directional distribution of trips to and from site developments. ' For large and complex developments within the middle of a large urbanized area,the task is best accomplished by creating a computerized transportation model of the urban street system and including the proposed , development changes. Trip distribution for moderate sized developments may be completed by manipulation of data provided by a current transportation plan. Smaller developments or developments on the fringe of a , small urban area can be easily handled by using existing traffic volumes on adjacent streets or by an area of influence method, or both. ' In this case, a transportation planning model was developed for the 1990 Transportation Plan and 1993 plan ' update. In 1995, Marvin & Associates modified the model for the Durston Road Corridor Study to reflect , accelerated growth being experienced in Bozeman. Additional modifications and specific details within the subject development area were added to the year 2016 QRS 11 model for purposes of analyzing trip distribution ' and projecting future street system volumes. Translation of subdivision trips to employment data was necessary within the modified model. In addition, the model parameters and path tree building functions , Page 10 ' assigns traffic to the street system in a manner that would be difficult to illustrate sufficiently for an accessibility ' study. Therefore,the model results were extracted in terms of trip distribution to and from the subdivision. With this information, manual traffic assignments were completed, which provides a better level of detail for ' accessibility analysis. tFigure 3., on the following page, is a graphic summary of directional trip distribution extracted from the traffic model for primary trips. Since the major population centers are south and northwest of the proposed development, the model tended to load primary trips to and from those directions, with 52% north and 43% south. The model indicated a split in traffic at Main Street with about the same number accessing northwest regions of Bozeman from west Main Street as those utilizing 1-90. Travel time calculations were made for two alternate routes that could be used from Main Street. It was determined that the travel time to and from the ' Main Street Haggerty intersection to the site is almost exactly equal. Therefore,a split in the 27%primary trips utilizing the 1-90 corridor was made at that juncture. ' Passerby traffic distribution is based on the percentage of total traffic entering the surrounding street system during the peak a.m. and p.m. hours. In the morning the highest percentage entering the site would be 61% in the southbound direction and in the evening the highest would be 60% in the northbound direction. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Assignment of site traffic to the street system and site access points is dependent upon several factors. Two ' of them are, directional distribution and operational site conditions. Directional distribution was discussed in ' the previous section. These proportions are used to provide traffic access demand which represent traffic movements to and from the site which would occur if street operations and internal site circulation had no effect on the direction of arrival or departure other than the access point used. Traffic distribution is further refined by calculating potential travel times within the sites and at ingress and egress points. The combined calculations of demand and least time accessibility are used to estimate the optimum traffic volumes at each access point. Page 11 1 25% �� F Main St E. Babcock Qio L N t: a E.Olive o U E.Curti y°'9 9a 1 I 38% 14% o /nte�state � 90 I 23% 77% � 9% Ellis St. 5% , 34% HOSPITAL �\Ja. i �a Ia 1 � 1 Figure 3. Primary Trip Distribution Page 12 ' Figure 4.,on the following page, represents the ssi nment of vehicular site trafficvolumes umes on the existing street system. Also indicated on this figure,are percentages that this traffic is of existing ADT. As an example, Highland Boulevard,north of Main would experience an additionall045 vehicles during the average weekday. This is approximately 11% of current ADT calculated for this section of street. It is highly unlikely that 1045 vehicles would be added to this street immediately. By the time this development is complete and fully occupied, it is likely that the background traffic on Highland would have increased by 5 to 10%and the actual impact of 1045 vehicles would be less than 11 percent. Therefore,the percentage numbers shown in Figure 4. only serve to illustrate relative volume differences. Figure 4., also presents the results of traffic assignment analysis for the peak a.m. and p.m. hours. These volumes were calculated by applying primary and passerby trips distributions to full development vehicular trip generation. Proportional trip generation of each lot and least travel time for each access to and from each of the site lots were used to assign traffic to each possible turning movement. The negative numbers indicated in Figure 4., represents the result of passerby traffic redirection. TRAFFIC IMPACTS Traffic Volumes Impact for site development can be found simply by determining the change in traffic volumes expected. Site traffic assignments indicate what volume of traffic could potentially be added to the street system during the average weekday (AWT)and at the peak PM hour. The percent change in AWT only provides a general level of change and is used to identify locations where impacts could be significant. Determination of volume changes during peak traffic flow periods provides specific information on the type of impacts that could potentially occur. t In almost all cases, it is very difficult to determine ADT on any section of street to within 10% accuracy. Because of that fact, impact analysis on street with relative percentage increases less than 10% are not normally considered critical. The percentages indicated on Figure 4., indicate that Highland Boulevard and Haggerty Lane would both experience increases slightly greater than 10%. Ellis Street,which currently carries less than 200 ADT, would experience an increase many times that of its current level. • Page 13 AM PM AM PM 6 24 12 -- 6 44 r�� 24 12 �- 6 0 �� 24 0 -� r— 6 0 6 0 19 68sr4%1 F. Ma;n St E. Babcock Q E. Olive e��8 of E. Curti yd9 o �a ✓ h8 of /nte�Stat e 90 y 4S Ave. Weekday Site Traffic Ellis St. 211 140[8%] , : % of Existing ADT -472 + C) j HOSPITAL 19 ryh� AM , 8 AM 2 16 63 a PEAK HOUR r\a�a _1 19 SITE TRAFFIC ! 6\� AM PM `�— 51 i PM 2 -- PM 6 Enter 186 49 -- 45 Exit 47 134 I a Nti 1s -2 Figure 4. Site Traffic Assignment Page 14 Figure 5.,illustrates the assignment of full development site traffic to the surrounding street system and relative volumes that would result if the development existed today. None of these volumes or conditions will probably occur due to the dynamics of background traffic growth and other unknown development schedules. �I Capacity Impacts Appendix B contains capacity calculations for existing conditions along with existing plus site traffic. Figure 6.,on the page following,presents a summary of capacity calculation in terms of level of service(LOS)for two different conditions:existing and existing plus site traffic. Level of service(LOS)designations (A thru F) are shown for critical movements at five intersections and access points. The following narratives explain the capacity impacts at each intersection. It was determined that the only intersection which would be impacted by the added site traffic would be the intersection of Ellis Street and Highland Boulevard. Those impacts would occur in the peak .m.hour period 9 P P and they would occur on the Ellis Street eastbound approaches. The eastbound movements would go from LOS A to LOS C . Even though the amount of site added traffic on that approach is minimal, added traffic on other legs of the intersection would cause enough delay for eastbound traffic that the LOS would be reduced. Capacity calculations on Highland Boulevard using the HCM"Two Lane Highway"method,which is not entirely appropriate for this situation,indicate that the LOS would drop from"Y to"E". Since existing capacity was only 32 vehicles away from LOS "E", this change is somewhat misleading. As stated earlier, the capacity of ' Highland is totally dependent upon the capacity of its intersections. Therefore,capacity impacts on Highland are relatively insignificant. Page 15 0 3 0 � 0 1 I 4 1 7-8 AMA 0 2 4 30-5:00 PM 91 7-8 AM 4:30-5:00 PM 215-� 312 552—� 220 390 587—y f_ 481 171�� �- 195 175--\ r fir— 144 90 64 154�� fir— 44 107 � 95 250 1 220 0 117 27 134 62 18100 F.4.1 St ai E. Babcock >>Spp + Q y t CD C E. Olive 00 E. Curti tid9 9 d ow 400 ADT ITrP) �nte�state 9 rl 0 �. 1�5D ?DSO Ellis St. 260 1850 : 40 0 2 1 6l9 � 7I4 HOSPITAL 10 ___/ � 21 10 -- 7-8 AM 17 7-8 AM 5 �r— 30 ? '% 2 I 85 .�`b d 160 rNsl", 32 7 121 ^oy 52 ---4' '*,— 54 i 4:30-5:00 PM 25 4:30-5:00 PM 6 2 �� �- 45 6 20 400 Figure 5. Existing Plus Site Traffic Page 16 MW �I A Be AM PM B B--/ AM --C©©C� PMa-C8 A( Be CC r- C© C --�- T cc I I t t D AI F B C C O ®UUCC O F.Ma/n St. E. Babcock Q L N t. a E.Olive 3 CL rE.Curti �m 1 III i ° 7nte�state 9 � 0 Ellis St. 1 s QA AM A AM B -Existing LOS HOSPITAL ©B—<- 6® A @-LOS wt/Site Traffic A A O IA ©A- C © �- A r` A PM PM Figure 6. Off-site Capacity Impacts Page 17 Safety It has been determined that no substantial impacts to efficiency of the existing street system would be related to the site development. However, some degree of impacts may be associated with traffic safety. Sight distance was checked at the Ellis and Highland Boulevard intersection along with sight distance at the Ellis Street approaches. It was determined that adequate intersection sight distance exists. AASHTO and MDT guidelines were checked to determine if auxiliary turn lanes are warranted for any of the intersections and approaches. Appendix D contains both right and left turn nomographs used in the warrant procedure. From this reference material, it was determined that the additional southbound left turn movements on Highland at Ellis would require an additional left turn lane. A right turn lane for northbound traffic would not be triggered by this development, but may be warranted as background traffic grows in the future. �r. Pedestrians From traffic counts and observations, pedestrian demand is not high during the winter months. It is expected that the proximity of the bike/pedestrian path will encourage pedestrian access to the site. A crossing at Ellis should be noted as a concern, but study data is unable to define the exact demand and what level of control is required. It may be necessary to measure demand after development has begun and determine if that demand is sufficient to justify a formal pedestrian crosswalk. ACCESS& INTERNAL CIRCULATION Figure 7.,on the following page, is a summary of existing plus site traffic at the two ste approaches for peak a.m. and p.m. hours. Capacity calculations ( Appendix B) indicate that both of these approaches would operate at LOS °A"during both peak hours. Both intersections will operate efficiently with single approach lanes and no vehicle storage problems at the intersections would be encountered. Since both of these approaches would have traffic volumes at the same level as Ellis Street traffic, it is recommended that stop signs be installed to reinforce the right of way rules. r' Page 18 I 11 owl Ift �, �' am Im �A 100' AM no, MKI t .m AM 31 —y 55 AM 64 �� �� 19 90 48 I 79 —\ r 24 17 5 I 20 5 58 PM 8 18 �� f— 5 o ` / 58 PM 49 11 I( m 21 �� 5 46 14 V C 56 18 Ealls Street S Im Z LOT 4 LOT S =_ LOT ] OPEN SPACE tO Q A a miminjim O y OPEN SPACE LOT 7 LOT 6 OPEN SPACE ] 2 1 L01 1 2 WED A-2TFRb hij,111111 111111110111111111fJ11% I Figure 7. Peak Hour Traffic At Site Accesses Circulation within the site is provided by an internal roadway with a proposed median. Because of unique problems that can occur with medians, the following design recommendations are made: • Medians within an approach to a public street should be setback behind the crosswalk and marked crosswalks should be carried across the approach. The minimum face-of-curb to face-of-curb width for both entering and exiting lanes should be 18 feet to avoid blockage by stalled vehicles or maintenance equipment. • As with medians at the intersection approaches, a minimum width of 18 feet is required to allow room for circulation around maintenance or stalled vehicles in the single lanes. • Medians within the site should be designed so that moving vans can turn into and out of individual approaches, this requires geometric layout with SU turning radius templates. • Medians at intersections should not have landscaping taller than 30 inches to protect critical line of sight. 1 • "Keep Right" signs on the end of median islands and turn restriction signs are needed is some circumstances. ;M IMPACT MITIGATION & RECOMMENDATIONS , Development of this property as proposed would generate a substantial volume of traffic. The most significant impacts would be on Ellis Street adjacent to the site. C&H Surveying and Engineering has submitted a plan to reconstruct Ellis Street east of Highland Boulevard along the development's property boundary. The new street section will provide approximately 30 feet of paving within a future 37'(bc-bc)curbed street section. This would mitigate potential impacts on Ellis at the access points. Some consideration should be given to transitions and connections to the existing roadway on the east end of Ellis Street during design review, to ensure that the transition is safe. Page 20 This study also determined that a left turn lane would be needed for anticipated southbound traffic volumes on Highland Boulevard,at the Ellis Street intersection,to mitigate potential rear-end and left-tum accidents. The study also determined that the existing width of Highland Boulevard presents potential safety and efficiency problems with regard to incident management. Observed capacity of the street sections appears to be acceptable except when incidents block a lane. Therefore,it is believed that Highland Boulevard should have been constructed as a multi-lane facility from Main Street to the Hospital. Widening near the intersection for the left turn lane will improve the safety of the Ellis intersection,but will not alleviate the potential problems that were built into the original roadway. It is recommended that the City of Bozeman consider implementing the phase 2 construction plan as soon as possible. If such a task is not possible, it is recommended that the southbound left turn lane be implemented prior to full development of the site plan. Page 21 APPENDIX "A" TRAFFIC VOLUMES Page 22 :HAGGERETY LA S OF MAIN NORTAUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 3 3 0.2% 2 1 1 0.1% 3 3 3 0.2% 4 4 4 0.2% 5 9 9 0.5% 6 50 50 2.6% 7 138 138 7.1% 8 126 126 6.5% 9 125 125 6.5% 10 123 123 6.4% 11 153 153 7.9% 12 169 169 8.7% 13 144 144 7.4% 14 134 134 6.9% 15 121 121 6.3% 16 139 139 7.2% 17 175 175 9.0% 18 132 132 6.8% 19 75 75 3.9% 20 46 46 2.4% 21 32 32 1.7% 22 15 15 0.8% 23 15 15 0.8% 24 3 3 0.2% Total 753 1182 1935 100% GRAPH I 14% 13% 12% 11% � 10% 8% - 7% Weekday fL 5% I Q] 4% _. ...Il 3% 2% 1% 0% Hours of the Day HAGGERI& LANE S OF MAIN SAHBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. % of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 7 7 0.3% 2 2 2 0.1% 3 1 1 0.0% 4 1 1 0.0% 5 43 43 2.1% 6 36 36 1.8% �. 7 130 130 6.4% 8 167 167 8.2% 9 103 103 5.1% 10 104 104 5.1% 11 116 116 5.7% 12 152 152 7.5% 13 157 157 7.7% 14 150 150 7.4% 15 144 144 7.1% 16 165 165 8.1% 17 206 206 10.1% 18 121 121 5.9% 19 64 64 3.1% 20 74 74 3.6% 21 36 36 1.8% 22 34 34 1.7% 23 16 16 0.8% 24 7 7 0.3% Total 867 1169 2036 100% GRAPH 14% 13% _ 12%. _. 11% - O 10% - 9% r-+ 7% Weekday V 5% L Q� 4%.L 2% - 1% - 0% 1, Hours of the Day HAGGERETY LAA OF MAIN NB & SO Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 10 10 0.3% 2 3 3 0.1% 3 4 4 0.1% 4 5 5 0.1% 5 52 52 1.3% 6 86 86 2.2% 7 268 268 6.7% 8 293 293 7.4% 9 228 228 5.7% 10 227 227 5.7% 11 269 269 6.8% 12 321 321 8.1% 13 301 301 7.6% 14 284 284 7.2% 15 265 265 6.7% 16 304 304 7.7% 17 381 381 9.6% 18 253 253 6.4% 19 139 139 3.5% 20 120 120 3.0% 21 68 68 1.7% 22 49 49 1.2% 23 31 31 0.8% 24 10 10 0.3% Total 1620 2351 3971 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 4457 GRAPH 14% , 13% 12% 11% . O 10% 9% L V5% I ---- ------ ' 3% 2% i 1% i I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day l - i HAGGERETY LAO S OF ELLIS NORTHRUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 0 0 0.0% 2 0 0 0.0% �. 3 3 3 0.4% 4 3 3 0.4% 5 11 11 1.3% 6 33 33 4.0% 7 93 93 11.3% 8 73 73 8.9% 9 44 44 5.4% 10 30 30 3.7% 11 58 58 7.1% 12 76 76 9.3% 13 72 72 8.8% 14 51 51 6.2% 15 46 46 5.6% 16 47 47 5.7% � 17 55 55 6.7% 18 49 49 6.0% 19 30 30 3.7% 20 16 16 2.0% 21 15 15 1.8% 22 6 6 0.7% 23 8 8 1.0% 24 1 1 0.1% Total 273 547 820 100% GRAPH �w 14% 13% 12% 11% 10% O 8% -6. 7% C 6% Weekday ' Q 5% L (1) 4% 3% 2% 1% - 0°k Hours of the Day HAGGEREO LANE S OF ELLIS S040HBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 2 2 0.2% 2 0 0 0.0% 3 1 1 0.1% 4 0 0 0.0% 5 1 1 0.1% 6 13 13 1.5% 7 28 28 3.2% 8 40 40 4.6% 9 41 41 4.8% 10 42 42 4.9% 11 57 57 6.6% 12 53 53 6.1% 13 54 54 6.3% 14 52 52 6.0% 15 65 65 7.5% 16 71 71 8.2% 17 113 113 13.1% 18 65 65 7.5% 19 41 41 4.8% 20 54 54 6.3% 21 23 23 2.7% 22 30 30 3.5% 23 11 11 1.3% 24 5 5 0.6% Total 478 384 862 100% GRAPH 14% 13% 12% 11% O 10% ' 9% 0 6% - ■ 7% _. 1 6% . . Weekday V 5% L Q� 4% 3% 2% - 1% I 0% 1-1 1- 1 Hours of the Day HAGGERETY LANA OF ELLIS NB & S139 Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. % of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 2 2 0.1% 2 0 0 0.0% 3 4 4 0.2% 4 3 3 0.2% 5 12 12 0.7% 6 46 46 2.7% 7 121 121 7.2% 8 113 113 6.7% 9 85 85 5.1% 10 72 72 4.3% 11 115 115 6.8% 12 129 129 7.7% �. 13 126 126 7.5% 14 103 103 6.1% 15 111 111 6.6% 16 118 118 7.0% 17 168 168 10.0% 18 114 114 6.8% 19 71 71 4.2% 20 70 70 4.2% 21 38 38 2.3% - 22 36 36 2.1% 23 19 19 1.1% 24 6 6 0.4% Total 751 931 1682 100% : Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 1888 GRAPH 14% 13% 11% O 10% O 8% t . _. . ... r..r 7% U 5% i 4% Q_ 3% ---.- 2% 1% f_ o% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11'12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day ELLIS WEST OF HOGERTY EB & W Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 4 4 1.0% 2 0 0 0.0% 3 1 1 0.3% 4 0 0 0.0% 5 4 4 1.0% 6 5 5 1.3% 7 27 27 7.0% 8 17 17 4.4% 9 14 14 3.6% 10 26 26 6.7% 11 14 14 3.6% 12 36 36 9.3% 13 22 22 5.7% 14 31 31 8.0% 15 35 35 9.1% 16 39 39 10.1% 17 24 24 6.2% 18 23 23 6.0% 19 21 21 5.4% 20 12 12 3.1% 21 17 17 4.4% 22 5 5 1.3% 23 6 6 1.6% 24 3 3 0.8% ' Total 185 201 386 100% Day Factor= 1.1 Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 433 GRAPH 1a%- 13% .- .. ........_ ... -- 12% I _ --._.. .. _.__. ._._. .._.. ... 11% I. ... . . . i O 10% 9% i O 8% _ 4+ 7%. -'- C 6% a% __...._.. Q_ 2% -' - 2% I 1%.i. o% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day ELLIS WEST OF HASLAND EB & W139 Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 1 1 0.1% 2 4 4 0.3% 3 0 0 0.0% 4 2 2 0.1% 5 13 13 0.9% 6 40 40 2.7% 7 86 86 5.8% 8 146 146 9.8% 9 147 147 9.8% 10 117 117 7.8% 11 149 149 10.0% 12 132 132 8.8% 13 146 146 9.8% 14 128 128- 8.6% 15 111 111 7.4% 16 124 124 8.3% _ 17 88 88 5.9% 18 27 27 1.8% 19 12 12 0.8% 20 6 6 0.4% 21 6 6 0.4% 22 7 7 0.5% 23 0 0 0.0% 24 1 1 - 0.1% Total 382 1111 1493 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 1676 GRAPH 14% � 13% 12% I O10% ... . . . ... . l.- 9% 0 8% 7% L 5% i Q. 3% �. __. __. ...._.�.. 2% I - -- - - 1% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day I ' ELLIS EAST OF HIOLAND EB & WO Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 6 6 3.1% 2 5 5 2.6% 3 1 1 0.5% 4 0 0 0.0% 5 0 0 0.0% 6 1 1 0.5% 7 11 11 5.7% 8 18 18 9.3% ' 9 10 10 5.2% 10 14 14 7.2% 11 21 21 10.8% 12 30 30 15.5% 13 11 11 5.7% 14 15 15 7.7% 15 19 19 9.8% 16 8 8 4.1% 17 11 11 5.7% 18 1 1 0.5% 1 19 7 7 3.6% 20 3 3 1.5% 21 2 2 1.0% ' 22 0 0 0.0% 23 0 0 0.0% 24 0 0 0.0% Total 51 143 194 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 218 GRAPH 13% 12% j O 1°% 9% i. U5% 4% i Q_ 3% ' _. --------- z% o% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day 1 HIGHLAND SOUT ELLIS NORTHBOLS , Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 6 6 0.2% 2 6 6 0.2% 3 4 4 0.1% 4 6 6 0.2% 5 30 30 0.8% 6 59 59 1.6% 7 185 185 5.1% 8 207 207 5.7% 9 235 235 6.4% 10 234 234 6.4% 11 311 311 8.5% 12 313 313 8.6% 13 206 206 5.6% 14 275 275 7.5% 15 294 294 8.1% 16 407 407 11.1% 17 361 361 9.9% 18 188 188 5.1% 19 105 105 2.9% 20 99 99 2.7% 21 43 43 1.2% 22 35 35 1.0% , 23 27 27 0.7% 24 15 15 0.4% Total 1574 2077 3651 100% Day Factor= 1.1 Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 4098 GRAPH 14% , 12% .. ___...__.. ._. - - ........ ......... -----....._.. .. .. .. O 10% 9% 8% w 7% i _..- - -. ... . ... .. . ...... C 8% I Q_ 3% 2% -- i 1% 0% 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day ' HIGHLAND NORT& ELLIS SOUTHBOA Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. % of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 16 16 0.4% 2 5 5 0.1% 3 4 4 0.1% 4 6 6 0.1% 5 21 21 0.5% 6 92 92 2.1% 7 301 301 6.8% 8 458 458 10.4% 9 338 338 7.7% 10 323 323 7.3% 11 273 273 6.2% 12 330 330 7.5% 13 390 390 8.8% 14 365 365 8.3% 15 324 324 7.3% 16 295 295 6.7% 17 293 293 6.6% 18 196 196 4.4% 19 127 127 2.9% 20 78 78 1.8% 21 81 81 1.8% 22 53 53 1.2% 23 34 34 0.8% 24 14 14 0.3% Total 1495 2922 4417 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 4958 GRAPH 1 14% 13%.i. _ . ._ .._ .. 12% i 10% , .. __..._. _...._. . . O1 9% .. ... _ .._.. .__. . .. 0 8%. C 6% .. _. . .... ` 5%.. 2% 1% o% 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day APPENDIX "B" CAPACITY CALCULATIONS r Pie 23 MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS*N ANALYSIS ! November 30,2000 11:27 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.rNT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 197 vph 299 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 1112 pcph 994 pcph Movement Capacity: 1112 pcph 994 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 99.7% 99.3% LEFT TURN FROM. Major Right Leg Major Left Leg Conflicting Flow: 200 vph 342 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1384 pcph 1189 pcph Movement Capacity: 1384 pcph 1189 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.8% 99.7% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.7% 99.7% THROUGH FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 544 vph 504 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 591 pcph 619 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: 588 pcph 615 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 100.0% 100.0% LEFT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 505 vph 503 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 563 pcph 565 pcph Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.99 0.99 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):1.00 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: 557 pcph 561 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes - Shared Minor Bottom Leg Volume I Capacity I Capacity I DELAY I Level OtService X Left Turn 6 j 557 I 668 ! 5.5 B- Short Delays Ave Delay X Through ' 0 ; 588 1 668 5.5 B-Short Delays 5�-5 c X_Right Turn j 3 1112 668 i 5.5 B-Short Delays Shared Minor Top Leg i Volume I Capacity I Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left Turn 15 561 651 5.7 B-Short Delays Ave Delay X Through 0 615 651 5.7 B-Short Delays 5.7 sec. X Right Turn 7 994 651 5.7 B-Short Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service i Ave Delay X Major Left Leg 3 1189 3.0 A- Little Delay i 0.0 sec. X Major Right Leg 3 1384 2.6 A-Little Delay ! 0.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.3 seconds 1 MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS*N ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:27 AM C:IUNSIG3WIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg Y=YIELD CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= SHARED LANES X X X 0% RADIUS<50 ft S I S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN LANE F— Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) Major Left Leg Grade= 0% --� NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN S S S RADIUS<50 ft Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg left thru right left thru right left thru right I left thru right I UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 175 4 2 230 69 4 0 2 10 j 0 i 5 __PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 j .70 .70 .90 .80 .70 .70 .70 .75 I .75 i .75 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 194 6 3 256 86 6 0 3 13 0 7 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 3 1194 1 6 3 256 86 6 0 3 15 0 7 VOLUMES INPCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES 1 7 0 5 86 1200 E--- 256 1800 Major Right Leg 3 3 i Major Left Leg 1800 194 —� 1200 6 6 0 3 NOTE: Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the j Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.0b 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSI6ON ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:31 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg Y=YIELD CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= 1 SHARED LANES X X X 0% RADIUS<50 ft S S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE � � NO RIGHT TURN LANE F-- Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) Major Left Leg Grade= 0% NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN S S S RADIUS<50 ft Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 1 LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg _ left thru right left thru right left thru right I left thru right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 1160 85 74 226 69 30 17 21 10 10 5 ' PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .80 .80 .90 .80 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 178 106 92 251 86 40 I 23 28 13 13 7 j PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 1 3 178 106 1 102 1251 86 44 25 31 15 15 j 7 VOLUMES INPCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES 1 1 7 5 5 86 1200 E— 251 1800 Major Right Leg 102 3 Major Left Leg 1800 178 --� 1200 106 4 2 3 NOTE: 4 5 1 Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the Major is shared. Minor Left Turn Lane Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob , 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS*N ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:31 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg ' Conflicting Flow: 231 vph 294 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 1071 pcph 998 pcph , Movement Capacity: 1071 pcph 998 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 97.1 % 99.3% LEFT TURN FROM. Major Right Leg Major Left Leg , Conflicting Flow: 284 vph 337 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1265 pcph 1195 pcph Movement Capacity: 1265 pcph 1195 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 91.9% 99.7% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 89.8% 99.7% THROUGH FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 663 vph 673 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 517 pcph 511 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.89 0.89 Movement Capacity: 463 pcph 458 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 94.6% 96.7% LEFT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 630 vph 645 vph , Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 482 pcph 473 pcph ' Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.87 0.85 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):0.90 0.88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.89 0.86 Movement Capacity: 429 pcph 405 pcph I SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSERVICE ANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes I Shared , Minor Bottom Leg Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service i X Left Turn 44 429 539 8.2 B-Short Delays 1 Ave Delay X Through 25 463 539 8.2 B -Short Delays 8.2 .. 'sec X Right Turn 31 1071 539 8.2 B-Short Delays ' Shared Minor Top Leg Volume Capacity I Capacity DELAY Level Of Service I X Left Turn 15 405 482 8.1 B-Short Delays Ave Delay X Through ! 15 458 482 8.1 B-Short Delays i ! 8.1 sec. X Right Turn ; 7 998 j 482 8.1 B-Short Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ! Ave Delay X Major Left Leg 3 1195 3.6 A-Little Delay 0.0 sec. X Major Right Leg 102 1265 3.1 A-Little Delay l 0.7 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSSON ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:29 AM C:\UN SI G3\HIGHEL.INT . HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 448 vph 308 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds 11 Potential Capacity: 842 pcph 984 pcph Movement Capacity: 842 pcph 984 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 99.4% 99.7% LEFT TURN FROM. Major Right Leg Major Left Leg Conflicting Flow: 450 vph 331 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1060 pcph 1204 pcph Movement Capacity: 1060 pcph 1204 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.7% 99.3% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.6% 99.1 % THROUGH FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 789 vph 767 vph 1 Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 449 pcph 460 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: 443 pcph 454 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 100.0% 99.8% LEFT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 768 vph 768 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds ' Potential Capacity: 405 pcph 405 pcph Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.99 0.99 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity: 400 pcph 399 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Minor Bottom Leg I Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ! X Left Turn 0 400 842 4.3 A-Little Delay Ave Delay X Through 1 0 ! 443 ! 842 4.3 A-Little Delay 4.3 sec. 1 X Right Turn I 5 j 842 ; 842 I 4.3 A-Little Delay 1 Shared Minor Top Leg Volume Capacity � Capacity DELAY Level Of Service � X Left Turn 76 399 409 ! 10.9 C-Normal Delays I Ave Delay X Through ; 1 454 j 409 10.9 C-Normal Delays 10.9sec.! X Ri Right Turn g , 3 i 984 , 409 10.9 C-Normal Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service I Ave Delay X Major Left Leg ; 8 ! 1204 3.0 A-Little Delay ; f 0.1 sec. X Major Right Leg 3 1060 3.4 A-Little Delay i i 0.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.1 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSE&N ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:29 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH , S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg —� Y=YIELD CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= SHARED LAN RADIUUS<50 ft S S 0% NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN S NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN LANE Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE ' SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) Major Left Leg Grade= 0% NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN S S S RADIUS<50 ft , Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg , left thru right left thru right left thru right left thru right I UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 6 1 402 2 2 256 37 0 0 1 3 52 i 1 2 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .70 .70 .90 .80 .70 .70 .70 .75 .75 .75 , PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 447 3 3 284 46 0 0 4 69 i 1 j 3 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 447 3 3 284 1 46 0 0 5 76 1 3 , VOL UMES IN PCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES � 7 3 1 6 1-1 46 1200 E-- 284 1800 Major Right Leg 3 8 Major Left Leg 1800 447 —� 1200 3 0 0 5 NOTE: Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the Major is shared. Minor Left Turn Lane Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS46ON ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:32 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.rNT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg -� Y=YIELD CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= ' SHARED LANES X X X 0% RADIUS<50 ft S S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE I � � NO RIGHT TURN LANE � Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) Major Left Leg Grade= 0% . NO RIGHT TURN LANE NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN ( S S S RADIUS<50 ft Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% I SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 1 _ LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg left thru right I left thru right left thru right left thru right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 6 400 20 21 255 37 45 6 54 52 25 I 2 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .80 .80 .90 .80 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 I .75 _PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 1444 25 26 1283 46 60 j 8 I 72 69 33 i 3 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 1 8. 444 I 25 29 283 46 66 9 79 . 76 37 3 VOLUMES INPCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES 3 7 3 , 7 6 46 1200 E-- 283 1800 Major Right Leg f � 29 8 J Major Left Leg 1800 444 — 1200 25 6 9 7 NOTE: I6 9 Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the Major is shared.Street Left Turn Lane Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSE*N ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:32 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 457 vph 306 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 833 pcph 985 pcph Movement Capacity: 833 pcph 985 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 90.5% 99.7% LEFT TURN FROM: Major Right Leg Major Left Leg ' Conflicting Flow: 469 vph 330 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1038 pcph 1205 pcph Movement Capacity: 1038 pcph 1205 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 97.2% 99.3% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 96.5% 99.1 % , THROUGH FROM.. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 820 vph 810 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds , Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 434 pcph 439 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity: 415 pcph 420 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 97.8% 91.2% LEFT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 815 vph 837 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 382 pcph 372 pcph , Major Left,Minor Through, Impedance Factor(p"): 0.87 0.94 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):0.90 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.90 0.86 Movement Capacity: 344 pcph 320 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITY AND LEVEL OFSERVICE ANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Minor Bottom Leg I Volume Capacity i Capacity I DELAY Level Of Service X Left Turn 66 344 499 10.4 C-Normal Delays Ave Delay X Through 9 415 499 10.4 C-Normal Delays 10.4 sec. X Right Turn i 79 833 499 10.4 C-Normal Delays I Shared ' Minor Top Leg i Volume Capacity ; Capacity I DELAY I Level Of Service X Left Turn ; 76 320 353 15.1 C-Normal Delays Ave Delay -X Through 37 420 4 353 15.1 C-Normal Delays I_ 15.1sec. I X Right Turn 3 985 353 15.1 C-Normal Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service Ave Delay X Major Left Leg 8 1205 3.0 A-Little Delay 0.1 sec. X Major Right Leg 29 1038 3.6I A-Little Delay 0' 3 sec. Average Total Delay,for the entire intersection: 3.1 seconds , MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS]*ON ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:35 AM HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL LIMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% <- - 106 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 13 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 31 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 1 NO RIGHT TURN , ( RADIUS<50 ft 1 16 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Gr00% X X SHARED LANES 9; NOTE: Saturation Volumes are used SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of ;LARGE Queue Free States when the POPULATION Major Street Left Turn lane � is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg 1 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 23 1 8 85 12 4 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 i PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 31 1 11 106 17 6 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 31 1 13 106 19 6 CAPACITYANALYSIS ' Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 149 vph 31 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 836 pcph 1328 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 - ' Movement Capacity: 829 pcph 1328 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 32 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1651 pcph Movement Capacity: 1651 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.2% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.2% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 19 829 911 4.1 A-Little Delay Ave Dela i 4.1 sec. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 6 1328 911 4.1 A-Little Delay � X Left From Major Right Leg 13 1651 - 2.2 A-Little Delay i 0.2 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS40ON ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:37 AM C:\UNSIG3\HAGGEL.INT HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) , Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% F— 85 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg IV 49 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 29 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE I �NO ACCEL.LANE 37 S RADIUS<50 ft 2 f 2 NO RIGHT TURN I S STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES 8` 0 NOTE: 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. I Saturation Volumes are used —:LARGE to calculate Probability of POPULATION Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ' Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 22 26 31 68 18 13 I PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 29 37 44 85 26 19 ' PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 29 37 49 85 28 20 CAPACITY ANALYSIS , Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 177 vph 48 vph , Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 800 pcph 1299 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.97 Movement Capacity: 774 pcph 1299 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 66 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1585 pcph Movement Capacity: 1585 pcph ' Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 96.9% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 96.8% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 28 774 931 4.1 A-Little Delay Ave Delay 4.1 sec. . X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 20 1299 931 4.1 A-Little Delay I X_Left From Major Right Leg 49 1585 - 2.3 A-Little Delay Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.3 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS.ION ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:36 AM C:\UNSIG3\RAGGEL.INT HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <_ Grade= 0% E-- 66 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 3 Major Left Leg rSHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 140 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 17 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft ! 9 13 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= XI X SHARED LANES NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are used LARGE l SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of POPULATION I Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane ' I I is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg 1 VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru I left right 1 I UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 105 12 2 53 6 2 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 17 3 66 9 3 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 17 3 66 9 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ' Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 218 vph 149 vph ' Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 750 pcph 1136 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 1.00 - Movement Capacity: 748 pcph 1136 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 157 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1424 pcph Movement Capacity: 1424 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.8% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.8% SHARED LANE CAPA CITY AND LEVEL OFSER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 9 748 818 4.5 A-Little Delay Ave Delay X, Right From Minor Bottom Leg 3 A-Little Delay 1136 818 4.5 i y 14.5 sec. I X Left From Major Right Leg 3 1424 - 2.5 A-Little Delay i 0.1 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:0.3 seconds I MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.0b`' 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSOON ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:38 AM C:\UNSIG3\HAGGEL.INT HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL LIMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) , Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES F— Grade= 0% F— 66 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 16 Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 140 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 26 NO RIGHT TURN ! S S RADIUS<50 ft 1 4.1 5 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES , 1 3 NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are used _LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of POPULATION i Queue Free States when the j i Major Street Left Turn Lane II is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 105 18 10 53 26 34 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 26 14 66 37 49 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 26 16 66 41 53 CAPACITYANALYSIS , Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 233 vph 153 vph ' Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 732 pcph 1129 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 Movement Capacity: 723 pcph 1129 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 166 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1410 pcph Movement Capacity: 1410 pcph , Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 98.9% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 98.8% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSERVICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements I Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service i A- X Left From Minor Bottom Leg � 41 723 907 4.4 Little Delay Ave Dela 4.4 sec. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 53 1129 907 4.4 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 16 1410 - 2.6 A- Little Delay Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.4 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSOON ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:42 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES ' E— Grade= 0% E— 528 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 52 Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 639 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 181 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 11 5 ' STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= NO SHARED LANES 7 9 NOTE: 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 3 Saturation Volumes are used LARGE I to calculate Probability of POPULATION II Queue Free States when the i Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg ' VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru I left right 1 UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 575 154 38 475 134 43 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 639 181 48 528 158 54 ! PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 639 181 52 528 173 59 CAPACITYANALYSIS tMinor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 1305 vph 729 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 134 pcph 524 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.92 - ' Movement Capacity: 123 pcph 524 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 820 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 651 pcph ' Movement Capacity: 651 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 92.0% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ' _ F-Severe Congestion Ave Delay Left From Minor Bottom Leg 173 123 282.4 g ( 212.E sec., Right From Minor Bottom Leg 59 524 - 7.7 B-Short Delays Left From Major Right Leg I 52 651 - 6.0 B-Short Delays , 035 sec. ' Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:30.4 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSOON ANALYSIS . November 30,2000 11:42 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane. groupings-not by movement 95th Percentile Queue Lengths , according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in vehicles per hour. 1 7 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes , 1 1 i 1 1 . 1 1 1 ' MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS16ON ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:44 AM C:\UNSIG3Vvt4JNHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES IN PCPH ' S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <--- Grade= 0% F— 534 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 61 ' Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 652 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 181 NO RIGHT TURN I S is RADIUS<50 ft 1 8 ' STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= NO SHARED LANES 7 5 NOTE: 0% 3 Saturation Volumes are used SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of ,,LARGE Queue Free States when the POPULATION i Major Street Left Turn Lane ' I is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOL UME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 587 154 44 481 134 62 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 652 181 55 534 158 I 78 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 652 181 61 534 173 85 ' CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 1332 vph 743 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 128 pcph 514 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.90 - ' Movement Capacity: 116 pcph 514 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 833 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 641 pcph Movement Capacity: 641 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 90.5% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service _ F-Severe Congestion Ave Dela Left From Minor Bottom Leg 173 116 322.1218.7 sec. ' _Right From Minor Bottom Leg 85 514 - 8.4 B-Short Delays � Left From Major Right Leg 61 64.1 - 6.2 B-Short Delays 1 Or 6 sec.—j Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:33.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSOON ANALYSIS •. November 30,2000 11:44 AM C:\UNSIG3\MArNRAG.rNT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY , EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane , 95th Percentile Queue Lengths groupings-not by movement according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in vehicles per hour. 7 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes ' ' I MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSOON ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 I I AI AM MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL LIMES IN PCPH ' S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <__ Grade= 0% F— 407 1800 ' (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 55 Major Left Leg rEXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg ' Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 238 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 106 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 1 2 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= NO SHARED LANES 5 9 NOTE: 0% 1 Saturation Volumes are used SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of _LARGE Queue Free States when the POPULATION i Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg ' VOL UAIE ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 214 90 40 366 117 21 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 j PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 238 106 50 407 138 26 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 238 407 151 29 106 55 ' CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 747 vph 291 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 324 pcph 940 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.95 - ' Movement Capacity: 309 pcph 940 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 344 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1143 pcph Movement Capacity: 1143 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 95.2% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSERVICEANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ' - D-Lon Delays Ave Dela Left From Minor Bottom Leg 151 309 22.3 g Y 19.4 sec. Right From Minor Bottom Leg 29 940 - 4.0 A-Little Delay _Left From Major Right Leg 55 1143 - 3.3 A-Little Delay j 0 Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:3.7 seconds •MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob ' 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSdWN ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:41 AM MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY , EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane groupings-not by movement 95th Percentile Queue Lengths according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in , vehicles per hour. 1 2 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes , 1 ' MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSIOON ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:43 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES IN PCPH ' S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL T AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES ' <__ Grade= 0% <-- 433 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 88 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 244 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 106 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 1 3 ' STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= NO SHARED LANES 5 7 NOTE: 0% 1 Saturation Volumes are used LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of _ POPULATION I Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left ( thru I left ( right ' UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 220 90 64 390 117 27 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 244 106 80 433 138 34 ' ! PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 244 106 88 433 151 37 ' CAPACITYA NA L YSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 811 vph 297 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 293 pcph 931 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.92 - ' Movement Capacity: 271 pcph 931 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg ' Conflicting Flow: 350 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1134 pcph ' Movement Capacity: 1134 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 92.2% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume ' Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ' _ D-Lon Delays Av 'I Left From Minor Bottom Leg 151 271 28.9 g24.0 sec.'I _Right From Minor Bottom Leg 37 931 - 4.0 A-Little Delay Left From Major Right Leg 88 1134 - 3.4 1 A-Little Delay 0.6 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 4.6 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob r 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSAbN ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 11:43 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY , EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane ' groupings-not by movement 95th Percentile Queue Lengths according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in ' vehicles per hour. t 3 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes , HCM Analysis Summary y 7R MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH - Analysis Duration: 15 minutes Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) ,Approach i Outbound! Lane I i Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 I TR I 12.0 _ ' W B - 3---2 L 16.0 T 12.0 ; TR 12.0 NB I 1 LTR 16.0 - SB - 1 1 LTR i 12.0 East West North South Data _ _L_ _T R 1 L T R L T R L T R_ ' _Movement Volume(v h) 1 215 127 171 312 0 96 0 89 0 0 0 PHF _ 0.80_ 0.80 0.80 i 0.80 ! 0.80 j 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 %Heavy Vehicles_ - --0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 ' Lane Groups _ L TR i L TR LTR LTR Arrival Tyke- - 3 3 3 3 I 3 3 RTOR_Vol (yph) - -- _ 50_ 0 j 20 0 ' Peds/Hour - _ 0 0 i 0 0 %Grade 0 i 0 I 0 0 Parkers/Hour --- --- I --- --- Buses/Hour-- 0 I 0 0 0 - Signal Settings: Semi-Actuated Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec Phase: --_- -I 2 3 4 5 I 6 7 -_ 8-----Ped Only El3 L TP WB L - TP j NB-------- LTP � i - _...--- ------- -- i SB LTP j Green 15.5 14.7 17.8 I 0 Yellow 2.3 2.3 2..3 j All Red 1.7 1.7 1.7 - _ _---- _ Capacity Analysis Results -_ Approach___ ! ' Lane _-- Cap v/sRatio -- Ratg/Cio Lane v/c I Delay LOS Delay -_ App - Group _(vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB_.. -- - --- - -- ---- -- L 528 0.000 0.258 L 0.002 16.5 B 20.8 C TR_- 835 0.107 0.246 TR i 0.437 i 20.8 C ---_ Y- WB ' - - - ' L 523 0.106 0.258 L j 0.409 ; 20.8 C 20.9 C " TR 869 0.110 0.246 TR ! 0.449 20.9 C NB " LTR 438 ! 0.139 j 0.296 LTR 0.470 20.9 C 20.9 C SB LTR 563 0.000 0.296 LTR 0.000 0.0 A 0.0 A Intersection: Delay= 20.8sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.44 " Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.36 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 1 r HCM Summary Results — MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH p Approach Group A ,Lane Delay i 1 Delay Lane X (sec/ i (sec/ 0 App Grp v/s v/c i veh) ILOSI veh) �LOSI EB L 0.00 0.00 16.5 ; B 1 20.8 i C i TR 0.11 0.44 20.81 C s •--�312 --- ---- - - ------------------ --: ------------ 171 - W BANOW WE •-- L 0.11 0.41 20.81 C 20.9 C TR 0.11 0.45 20.91 C 1 — I`, I 215 I �! 127 NB ; LTR 0.14 0.47 20.91 C 20.9 4 C I 96 ' 89 —SB- ---------- i i l 12 13 -- LTR—0_00_ 0.00 0_0: A 0.0 A i 15 2 21 15 2 2: 18 2 2, Int. 0.36 0.44 20.81 C i I * Critical Lane Group , . 1 1 1 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 HCM Analysis SummaryY MAIN &c HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH ' - Analysis Duration: 15 minutes - Area Type: Non CBD _ - --- Lanes Geometry:Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) _Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 - EB- 3- 2 L_ - 16.0 T - 12.0 TR 12.0 WB 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 TR I 12.0 NB_ 1 1 LTR 16.0 SB ---'------ I LTR 12.0 ------_- East West North _ South Data L _T_ ? R L T R L T R L T _ R_ Movement Volume(vph) 2 552 163 138 491 ' 0 218 1 -208 1-^ 3 _ 4 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 j 0.90 i 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 %Heavy Vehicles 0 - 2 1 1 i 2 i 0 1 0 1 0 Lane Groups-__ L TR L TR ! LTR LTR Arrival Type - - ----3 3 -- 3 3 3 ---- -^3 ---- ' RTOR Vol(vph) - 80 0 60 0 Peds/Hour_ _ 0 0 0 0 %Grade - 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour --- --- --- _ --- ' Buses/Hour 0 0 0 - 0 Signal Settings:Semi-Actuated- Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec _..Phase: .-•---1--- 2 ---3 -4 � 5 6 -- 7 _ 8 _----Ped Only __ EB L TP j W B L TP NB- ------ - � LTP - ---- SB - ------- LTP - ---- Green 10.2 15.9 21.9 ! 0 Yellow - -- 2.3 2.3 2.3 - - ' All Red--- - ---1.7 --1.7 1.7 - - Capacity Analysis Results ^_ _ _Approach: v/s V/c Lane - _ Cap Ratio ---- Ratig/Co - Lane Ratio I Delay -- -- - Delay - App - Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio I (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB L 347 _ 0_001 -_ 0.170 _ L 0.006 20.7 C 26.5 C ' TR- _ -_ 918 0.203 0.265 TR 0.768 26.5 C ' - --' L _ 343 0.076 0.170 L 0.446 26.5 C 22.9 C TR 937 0.154 0.265 TR i 0.583 21.8 C I ' LTR - 536 -- 0.278 1 0.366 j LTR 0.759 i 26.4 C 26.4 C SB - - -- --- ....------ ---- --- --.-- ------ ----- - - LTR _ 561 0.005 0.366 LTR 0.014 12.2 B 12.2 B ' Intersection: Delay= 25.Osec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc 0.70 'Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.56 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 1 HCM Summary Results MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH Lane Group Approach Delay I Delay i Lane X 1 (sec/ (sec/ 3 App Grp v/s v/c j veh) jLOSI veh) ILOSI 4 1 1 EB ' L T 0.00 0.01 20.7 C ! 26.5 I C ! j 0 TR 0.20 0.77 26.5; C j jl' 491 --- -- - ;+441 i — 13 8 WB t— *L 0.08 0.45 ' 26.5 i C j 22.9 C — TR 0.15 0.58 i 21.81 C I - 552 Ti NB j j 163 -LTR 0.28 0.76 ! 26.41 C ! 26.4 C ! ':, 12181208 -SB ------- I j ( � — 2 !3 I ' -- LTR 0.01 0.01 12.21 B 12.2 1 B 10 2 21 16 2 2•. 22 2 2' — Int. 0.56 0.70 ! 25.01 C I * Critical Lane Group SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 ' 1 • s HCM Analysis Summary ' MAIN &. HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH ' Analysis Duration: 15 minutes Area Type: Non CBD Lanes IGeometry_Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) -- Approach Outbound! Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 ' _-EB - ---3--------2 L 16.0 T ! 12.0 j TR 12.0 _ WB 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 i TR 12.0 LTR 16.0 -_-_S B_- ---,-- ---1 LTR '� 12.0 --- East i West North South Data - L T R L i T i R L i T R L T R Movement Volume(vph) 1 215 171 195 I 312 0 ! 107 , 0 95 0 - 0-- 0 PHIF _ 0.80 0.80 0.80 i 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 i 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80_ Xo Heavy Vehicles 0 2 1 I 1 2 } 0 1 0 ; 1 0 0 - 0 Lane Groups L TR L TR �- i LTR LTR Arrival Ty_e ,- 3 3 3 3 3 3 _ RTOR Vol_(vph) ___ 80 0 30 _ 0 Peds/Hour 0 0 0 0 %Grade 0 j 0 I 0 0 Park_ers/Hour --- --- --- ---__ ' Buses/Hour - 0 I 0 0 0 Signal Settings: Semi-Actuated Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec 1 2 3 4 j 5 ( 6 7 8 Ped Only - 1 EB - ---- L -- TP -- WB L TP ------ - --NB LTP ' SB- ---_--- -- LTP -- Green 15.8 14.5 17.7 0 Yellow --- -- 2.3 2.3 1 2.3 ' All Red --- 1.7 l 1.7 1.7 j -- --- _,- Capacity Analysis Results -Approach_- - -- - - --- ' Lane Cap v/s g/C Lane v/c i Delay Delay App Group (vph) Ratio - -Ratio T Group I Ratio - (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB L - 537 0.000 0.263 L i 0.002 - 16.3 B 21.4 - C TR 818 0.113 0.242 TR 0.468 1, 21.4 C I W B- - -- ---- -_=-- ' -_-_-* L --_`^532- 0.120 `_0.263 - L i 0.459 ! 21.4 ~C----21.2 --- C- TR 856 0.110 0.242 TR 0.456 21.1 C i * LTR - 436 0.146 I 0.295 LTR 0.493 21.4 C 21.4 C SB - LTR 561 0.000 0.295 LTR 0.000 0.0 A 0.0 A ' Intersection: Delay= 21.3 sec/veh Int.LOS=C Xc= 0.47 *Critical Lane Group >(v/s)Crit= 0.38 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page I HCM Summary Results MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND — R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH Lane Group I Approach I Delay ` Delay Lane X I (sec/ (sec/ I 0 ; App Grp v/s v/c veh) ILOS veh) LOS 0 10 EB L 0.00 0.00 16.31 B 21.4 C TR 0.11 0.47 21.4: C j w 312 -- 195 WB *L 0.12 0.46 21.4 C 21.2 I C TR 0.11 0.46 21.11 C _ --- ---- ----1 I � I 215 NB I I 171 = i I I * 1 ` 1 107 95 LTR 0.15 _0_49 j 21.41 C 21.4 I C j l i -SB- --- — --— ! 1 12 -3- ---- LTR 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0.0 A ,- 16 2 2' 15 _— 2_2 17_ _— z 2 —_ — Int. 0.38 0.47 j 21.31 C j 1 * Critical Lane Group ' SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 ' HCM Analysis Summary MAIN &c HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH Analysis Duration: 15 minutes Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) ------ - Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 - EB _3_ 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 -WB __-3 ----_2 - L 16.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 --- -- _ - N B 1 1 LTR 16.0 _ SB -----1 -- -----1 LTR 12.0 East West North South Data L T R L I T R L T R - L T! R Movement Volume(vph) _ 2 552 175 144 -491 0 250_ 1 - 220 1 _ _3 - _ 4 P H F 0.90_ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Groups L _-TR - L TR - ` LTR LTR Arrival Type___ - - 3 3 3 3 3 - -3 - - rriv - RTOR Vol (vph) - - ---- - - 80 -- -- -- 0- 65 0 Peds/Hour 0 0 0 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/_H_our _ _ --- --- --- --- Buses/Hour 0 0 0 -- 0 Signal Settings_Semi-Actuated Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec - Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - 8---- Ped Only - E B.. - - -- -- L - TP ----- W B L TP NB LTP SB- - - ------- LTP --- ----------- Green 9.5 15.5 22.9 0 Yellow 2.3 2.3 2.3 - All Red 1.7 1.7 1.7 -. - -- - Capaciv Analysis Results _ _-_ _- - - _ - _ Approach: Lane Cap v/s g/C Lane v/c Delay Delay App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS E B L - - - -----325 ---- --0.001 0.159-- - L ---- 0.006 21.3 C 28.4 -_-- C • TR - 895 _- 0.208 0.259- TR _ 0.803 28.4 C WB -' L __ 322 - 0.079 -- 0.159 ~ L 0.497 28.4 --C --23.7-_ C TR_ 915 0.154 - 0.259 TR 0.597 22.4 C _-_--- * LTR 558 0.309 0.382 LTR t 0.808 28.5 C 28.5 C SB LTR - 586 0.005 0.382 LTR 0.014 11.5 B Intersection: Delay= 26.6sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc 0.74 *Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.60 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page I 0 HCM Summary Results MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH Lane Group Approach Delay i Delay Lane X (sec/ j ; (sec/ ; 3_ App Grp — v/s v/c veh) ILOSI veh) LOSI -- ---------- 4 1 EB -- -- —------=---- --=-- ----- — y L 0.00 0.01 21.3 C i 28.4 C * — 0 TR 0.21 0.80 28.4 j C -- 491 — 144 WB I '— L_ 0.08 0.50 28.4 i C 23.7 C i M TR 0.15 0.60 i 22.41 C 1 2 !4 1 i 552 tll i _-:--_— � 175 NB LTR 0.31 0.81 I 28.51 C j 28.5 C j ; i 250 220 � i 1 SB i - 2 -- 3 LTR 0.01 0.01 11.5 B 11.5 B __10 — 2 2 16 2 2 22 —2 2 Int. 0.60 0.74 26.6 C i Critical Lane Group SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS ON ANALYSIS 41 November 30,2000 03:43 PM WEST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK AM HOUR tt+ INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES E— Grade= 0% 60 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 33 Major Left Leg rSHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 113 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 99 NO RIGHT TURN _ , S I S RADIUS<50 ft 21 7 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade X X SHARED LANES 81 NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are used :LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of _ POPULATION Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane iis shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 90 79 24 48 20 5 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 r� PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 113 99 30 60 25 ( 6 ` PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 113 99 33 60 28 7 r CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 252 vph 162 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 773 pcph 1157 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.98 - Movement Capacity: 754 pcph 1157 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 211 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1368 pcph Movement Capacity: 1368 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 97.6% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 97.5% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service �i X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 28 754 810 4.6 A-Little Delay Ave 4.6 sec. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 1 7 1157 810 4.6 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 1 33 1368 - 2.7 A-Little Delay 1.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES . WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERS ON ANALYSIS November 30,2000 03:43 PM WEST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK PM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES f-- Grade= 0% E--- 61 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 7 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 73 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 26 NO RIGHT TURN RADIUS<50 R 7 2 S S STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES 7 5 NOTE: .7 0% { SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. I Saturation Volumes are usel I to calculate Probability of LARGE I Queue Free States when the POPULATION i I Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 58 21 5 49 56 18 I PEAK HOUR FACTORS- .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 26 6 61 70 23 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 26 7 61 77 25 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 153 vph 86 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 874 pcph 1259 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 1.00 - /y Movement Capacity: 870 pcph 1259 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 99 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1542 pcph Movement Capacity: 1542 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.5% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.5% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes I Shared Movements j Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service f ( X. Left From Minor Bottom Leg I 77 870 942 4.3 A- Little Delay ; Ave DO X Right From Minor Bottom Leg ��7 1259 942 4.3 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 1542 - 2.3 A-Little Delay 0.2 sec. ; Average Total Delayfor the entire intersection: 1.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES • WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTER ION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 03:45 PM EAST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK AM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES F— Grade= 0% F-- 69 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 26 Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 39 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 80 S S NO RIGHT TURN _ RADIUS<50 ft 2 7 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade X X SHARED LANES 3 NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are used LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. I to calculate Probability of POPULATION Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru left ' right i UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 31 64 19 55 17 5 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 39 80 24 69 21 6 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 39 80 26 69 23 7 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 171 vph 79 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 855 pcph 1269 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.98 - Movement Capacity: 839 pcph 1269 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 119 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1510 pcph Movement Capacity: 1510 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 98.3% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 98.2% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity I DELAY Level Of Service C� elay X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 23 839 911 4.1 A-Little Delay A4.1ve Dsee. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 7 1269 911 4.1 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg , 26 1510 - 2.4 1 A-Little Delay j Or 7 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.8 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSIDON ANALYSIS • November 30,2000 03:44 PM EAST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK PM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES, Grade= 0% 10 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 7 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 73 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 23 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft ( 6 I 1 Grade= 3' 9 NOTE: STOP OR YIELD SIGN 0% Xi X SHARED LANES � � Saturation Volumes are used SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. i to calculate Probability of _LARGE i Queue Free States when the POPULATION i Major Street Left Tum Lane ' is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right I UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 58 18 5 8 46 14 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 23 6 10 58 18 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 23 7 10 63 19 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 100 vph 84 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 934 pcph 1262 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 1.00 - Movement Capacity: 930 pcph 1262 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 95 vph `� Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds ` Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1549 pcph Movement Capacity: 1549 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.5% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.5% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSERVICEANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 63 i_ 930 990 4.0 A-Little Delay Ave Deli � 4.0 sec. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 19 1262 990 4.0 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 7 1549 - 2.3 A-Little Delay 11.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection. 1.8 seconds 1� 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION. . . . HIGHLAND BLVD ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . R MARVIN TIME OF ANALYSIS. . . . . PEAK PM DATE OF ANALYSIS. . . . . 12-12-2000 OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------- ----------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. . . . . . . . . 1 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) . . . . . . . . . . 40 / 60 LANE WIDTH (FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT. ) . . . 2 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- - ----- ----- ----- ----- A 4 3 3 . 2 . 81 . 94 . 93 B 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 C 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 D 5 2 . 9 3 .3 . 81 . 94 . 92 E 5 2 . 9 3 . 3 . 93 . 94 . 92 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 750 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 815 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 60 . 03 B 254 . 13 C 546 . 28 D 847 .43 E 2036 . 9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS : D _ 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION. . . . HIGHLAND BLVD ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . R MARVIN ' TIME OF ANALYSIS . . . . . PEAK PM DATE OF ANALYSIS. . . . . 12-12-2000 OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING PLUS SITE A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ---------- ------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. . . . . . . . . 1 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 ; DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) . . . . . . . . . . 40 / 60 LANE WIDTH (FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT. ) . . . 2 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------- --- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS ---T- ---B- ---R- ---w d HV- A 4 3 3 . 2 . 81 . 94 . 93 B 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 C 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 D 5 2 . 9 3 .3 . 81 . 94 . 92 E 5 2 . 9 3 .3 . 93 . 94 . 92 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS INPUT VOLUME (vph) . 815 ------ ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 886 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C ' --- --------- ----- A 60 .03 B 254 . 13 C 546 .28 D 847 .43 E 2036 . 9 APPENDIX "C" SPOT SPEED STUDY Page 24 SPOT SPEE UDY ANALYSIS (Radar) SITE ; HIGHLAND BOULEVARD DIRECTION: NORTHBOUND DATE: 11/03/00 TIME: 10:30 TO 11:30 am SPEED SPEED CUMUL. RELATIVE CUMULATIVE RANGE VALUE fREQ FREQ.: FREQ % `;.:FREQ % 20 to 22 22 1 1 0.85% 0.85% 23 to 25 25 2 3 1.71% 2.56% �, 26 to 28 28 4 7 3.42% 5.98% 29 to 31 31 14 21 11.97% 17.95% 32 to 34 34. 22 43 18.80% 36.75% 35 to 37 37 24 67 20.51% 57.26% 38 to 40 40 25 92 21.37% 78.63% 41 to 43 43 16 108 13.68% 92.31% 44 to 46 46 5 113 4.27% 96.58% 47 to 49 49 2 115 1.71% 9&29% 50 to 52 52 0 115 0.00% 98.29% 53 to 55 55 1 116 0.85% 99.15% 56 to 58 58 1 117 0.85% 100.00% 59 to 61 61 0 117 0.00% 100.00% ! 62 to 64 64 0 117 0.00% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES= 117 MEAN SPEED= 37.46 mph 85TH PERCENTILE = 41.40 mph PACE SPEED= 29 mph TO 38 m h P p SIGMOID CURVE 100% Lu 1� w o a � . F40% .. . _ ....__: ._._ _._. ..- - ...... z ■ w U w d20% i .......__...._ ._---.. ...__,._. ...-.._._.._. ._.. -. .. ... I 22 25 2a 31 u 37 40 17 18 48 82 as 88 81 84 SPEED(MILES/HOUR) A SPOT SPEE*TUDY ANALYSIS (Radar) i SITE ; HIGHLAND BOULEVARD DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND DATE: 11/03/00 TIME: 10:30 TO 11:30 am SPEED;.. :..SPEED.-.':*.CUM UL:.,.'RELATIVE::CUMULATIVE RANGE ' "VALUE FREQ FRE6. FREQ(%) FREQ(% 20 to 22 22 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 to 25 25 1 1 0.85% 0.85% 26 to 28 28 4 5 3.42% 4.27% 29 to 31 31 16 21 13.68% 17.95% 32 to 34 34 21 42 17.95% 35.90% 35 to 37 37 30 72 25.64% 61.54% 38 to 40 40 21 93 17.95% 79.49% 41 to 43 43 16 109 13.68% 93.16% 44 to 46 46 3 112 2.56% 95.73% 47 to 49 49 2 114 1.71% 97.44% 50 to 52 52 1 115 0.85% 98.29% 53 to 55 55 2 117 1.71% 100.00% 56 to 58 58 0 117 0.00% 100.00% 59 to 61 61 0 117 0.00% 100.00% 62 to 64 64 0 117 0.00% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES= 117 MEAN SPEED= 37.46 mph 85TH PERCENTILE = 41.21 mph PACE SPEED= 30 mph TO 39 mph SIGMOID CURVE 100% w 9ox W > 60% _... . - __ ._ LL O W W 40x W d 20% ox � 22 25 29 31 u 57 40 u 49 49 52 55 M 61 84 SPEED(MILESAOUR) ' 1 APPENDIX "D" TURN LANE WARRANTS Page 25 G �1 AASHTO Table IX-15. Guide For Left Turn Lane 800 DEEM 700 600 -- i I 5% LT o > 500o 10 /o LT SB LT TURN ON HIGHLAND AT ELLIS Z 400 ` I WARRANTED �— ca 15% LTO 300 Q 2 200 20% LT ■� 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Opposing Volume ,1 13.4(2) . INTERSECTIONS AT-GRADE April 1994 120 t�1B 100 RIGHT-TURN LANE AWAY BE JUSTIFIED 0 80 �. v z w C a 60 o V, � W V : � = RIGHT-TURN LANE MAY ,- NOT BE JUSTIFIED . F > = 1 40 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 , TOTAL. DHV,VEHICLES PER HOUR,IN ONE DIRECTION Note: For highways with a design speed below 80 km/h with a DHV<300 and where right turns > 40, an adjustment should be used. To read the vertical axis of the chart, subtract 20 from the actual ` number of right turns. t Example Given: Design Speed = 60 km/h DHV = 250 vph Right Turns = 100 vph Problem: Determine if a right turn lane Is necessary.. . Solution: To read the vertical axis, use 100 -20 = 80 vph. The-figure Indicates that a right-turn lane is not necessary, unless other factors (e.g., high accident rate) indicate a lane is needed. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON 2-LANE HIGHWAYS , Figure 13.4A ; I NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER A Planned nit Development Covenants and Architectural Guidelines As submitted for recording 1211512000 See recorded documents for final changes. Prepared and submitted by: �! John Campbell and Gary Lusin, Owners Bayliss Architects, P.C., Architects '� C&H Engineering, Civil Engineers NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER COVENANTS AND LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES ; It is the general intent of this Document to establish the legal authority for and to list the Covenants that pertain to the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision, and to establish the Northern Rockies Professional Center Owners' Association, and the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. These Covenants detail how the properties within the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision are to be developed and maintained. More specifically, the Covenants define how the buildings are to be designed and landscaped, and how the Common Open Space which is within the property is to be used, managed and maintained. When a lot is bought in the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision property, the owner automatically becomes a member of the Northern Rockies !j Professional Center Owners' Association. This Lot Owners' Association will be run by its members. It is the Association's duty to implement, administrate, and enforce all the Covenants including the maintenance and management of the Common Open Space, Paths and Roads, and to carry on the day-to-day activities of the Lot Owners' Association. There will be an Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee which will be chosen by the Declarant. The Architectural and Landscaping Committee's duty is to, in general, approve or disapprove the building plans brought to it by the individual Lot Co Owners. r 3 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES FOR NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER PROPERTY This declaration, made this 15ih day of December 2000, by XXXXX or assigns, with principle office in Bozeman, Montana, hereinafter referred to as "declarant". A. WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the following described land in Gallatin, County, Montana: Tract C Certificate of Survey 1177C. B. WHEREAS, Declarant intends to sell, dispose of, divide into lots, and convey �. The real property above described and more specifically described in the final plat of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER, Gallatin County, Montana, and C. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject all of said real property and the lots and subdivisions thereof to protective and restrictive covenants, conditions, restrictions, guidelines and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "Covenants", each and all of which is and are for the benefit of said property, lots and subdivisions and the owners thereof, and shall run with the land applying and binding the present owners and all future owners and successors in interest. D. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish that these Covenants do hereby create the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, publish, and impose upon the Parcel, the following protective and restrictive covenants upon the property which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design, use, and development of the Parcel, and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted as herein mentioned, and said Covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, lot, or division. Said Covenants are as follows. ,r 4 �I ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Lot Owners' Association" or "Association" shall mean the Northern Rockies Professional Center Lot Owners' Association, its successors and assigns. The Association may be incorporated as a Montana nonprofit corporation or a Limited Liability Corporation with its members as the lot owners. 1.2 "Member" shall mean any person or entity owning or purchasing a lot in the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision property. Each lot owner shall be a member of the Association and agrees to abide by and be bound by these Covenants, and the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and Resolutions of the Association, if any. 1.3 "Owner" shall mean the legal title holders, or contract purchasers, whether one or more persons or entities, owning or purchasing a fee simple title to any lot but excluding those having an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation; provided, however, that prior to the first conveyance of each portion of the properties for value, owner shall mean Declarant. 1.4 "Declarant" shall mean XXXXX or assigns;and shall not mean a purchaser of a lot from the Declarant. 1.5 "First President of the Association"or"First President" shall mean the person who has the complete, final, and binding authority over all matters and decisions of the Association, including but not limited to, the operation hiring, accounting, financing, management, and the operation hiring, accounting, and management of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee or"Committee". The First President of the Association will be either the Declarant himself or a representative of the Declarant, and the First President's position and authority over the ' Association shall be permanent unless.he chooses, in writing, to resign at an earlier time. 1.6 "Architectural and Landscape Review Committee" or"Committee" or A.L.R.C. shall mean the Committee appointed by the Declarant whose function is to review and approve or disapprove plans, specifications, designs, landscaping, sites and locations of improvements to be constructed or erected on the property. 1.7 "Declaration" shall mean this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision, and as it may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. 1.8 "Parcel" shall mean all of the real property described and platted as NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision, according to the official 5 I subdivision plats thereof filed of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.9 "Property" shall mean a specific part of the Parcel which has a specific zoning designation and use, i.e., Office Use, as shown on the plat of the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision. 1.10 "Project" shall mean the organization, division, improvement, operation and sale of property in NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 1.11 "Lot" shall mean the smallest subdivided unit of land for sale in the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property as shown on the plat for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 1.12 "Common Area" or"Open Space" shall mean all of the Parcel conveyed to the Lot Owner's Association for use by the Association and its Members and the Owners in common. The Common Area shall be the parts of the Parcel within the zoned property which are not specifically owned by individual Lot owners. 1.13 "Open Space Management Plan" shall mean the management plan for the Common Area or Open Space conveyed to the Lot Owner's Association for use by the Association and its Members and the Owners in common. 1.14 "Beneficiary" shall mean a Mortgagee under a Mortgage, as well as a Beneficiary under a Trust Indenture. 1.15 "Mortgage" shall mean a Trust Indenture as well as a Mortgage. ' 1.16 "Mortgagee" shall mean a Beneficiary under, or holder of, a Trust Indenture as well as a Mortgagee under a Mortgage. 1 1.17 "Architect" shall mean a person holding a certificate of registration to practice architecture in the State of Montana or any state in the United States. 1.18 "Improvement (s)" shall include,but not exclusively, all building, outbuildings, bridges, roads, paths,pathways, driveways,parking areas, fences, screening walls and barriers, retaining walls, stairs, decks, water lines, sewer lines, springs, ponds, lagoons, ditches, viaducts and electrical, gas and TV distribution facilities hedges; windbreaks, natural and or planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, loading areas and all other structures, installations and landscaping of every type and kind, whether above or below the land surface. 1.19 "Capital Improvement(s)" shall mean an Improvement or two or more interdependent improvements of a substantial nature benefiting the Association, Common Area, which, when undertaken, may reasonably be anticipated to require a projected expenditure by the Association of a total amount greater than $10,000.00. 1 6 1.20 "Occupant" shall mean a lessee or licensee of an Owner, or any other person or entity other than the Owner in lawful possession of a Lot or Lots with the permission of the Owner. 1.21 "Record", "recording", "recorded" or"recordation", shall mean,with respect to any document, the recordation of said document, the recordation of said document in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.22 "Developer" or"Building Contractor" shall mean any person or entity buying one or more Lots from the Declarant for the purpose of building office. 1.23 "Office", refer to a specific classification of R-O office buildings as defined in the Bozeman Zone Code. 1.24 "A.L.R.C."is an abbreviation for the Architectural and Landscaping Review I Committee. ARTICLE H AUTHORITY These guidelines shall apply to the subdivision plats for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision as will be recorded at the Gallatin County Courthouse. Declarant hereby declares that the entire Parcel, more particularly described above, is, and shall be, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, occupied, built upon or otherwise used, improved, or transferred in whole or in part, subject to this Declaration. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth herein are declared and agreed to be in furtherance of a general plan for the division, improvement and sale of the property and are established for the purpose of enhancing, conserving, and I protecting the value, desirability and attractiveness of the property and every part thereof. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions herein shall run with all of the property for all purposes and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Declarant, the Association and all Owners, Occupants, and their successors in interest as set forth in the Declaration. The Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee and the Association is established under the authority of these Restrictive Covenants for the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision property, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Owners' Association of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision and the Montana Non-Profit or L.C.C. Corporation Act. ARTICLE III 7 , 1 GENERAL COVENANTS 3.1 Owner's Right to Common Area, Paths and Roads. Every Owner shall have a right to use the Common Areas, Paths, and Roads as shown on the approved final plat of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. The Owner's right to use the Common Areas, Paths and Roads shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot, subject to the following Provisions: a) The right of the Association to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the Common Areas, Paths, and Roads for the overall benefit of the Association and its members including limitations on the number of guests permitted to use the Common Area and restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including,but not limited to, the use of firearms, fireworks, all motor driven vehicles, loud music, and loud parties in the Common Area or as otherwise specified in the Open Space Management Plan; b) The Open Space Management Plan and any other reasonable restrictions on the use of the Common Areas and Paths shall be enforced and implemented by the president of the Association. c) The right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or any part of its right to the Common Area and Trials to any public agency, authority, utility,person, corporation or other entity for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Association. No such dedication or transfer shall be effective unless approved by sixty seven percent (67%) of the Directors. 3.2 Owners Right to Parking Area. Every Owner shall have a right to use the parking areas. The Owner's right to use the parking areas shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot or building subject to the following provisions: a) Compliance with the Bozeman City Zone Code. b) The right of the Association and the First President to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the parking areas for the overall benefit of the Association and its members including restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including,but not limited to, special sales events, merchandise display stands or tables, signs, fireworks, loud music, and loud parties in the parking area. c) The right of the Association to charge reasonable fees for the disproportionate use by Owners or their clients of the parking area. d) The right of the Association to suspend the voting rights and right to use of the parking areas of any Owner and/or Occupant for any period during which any assessment against his Lot or person remains unpaid and for any infraction of its published rules and regulations for any period of time the Association deems necessary. 3.3 Nuisance. No Owner, guest or invitee may use or occupy the Common Area,Paths, Roads, building, parking area, or any Lot in such a manner as to disturb or interfere with the peaceful use, occupancy or enjoyment of any other Lot or building Owner in the 8 i subdivision. Violations shall be enforced as provided in paragraph 12.1 of these Covenants. 3.4 Control and Management. The Association shall have the exclusive right and obligation to manage, control, and maintain the Common Area, Paths, Roads, and ' Parking Areas including but not limited to the layout, design, and installation of any improvements in accordance with these Covenants and the Open Space Management Plan for the Common Area. 3.5 Delegation of Use. Any Owner may delegate, upon notification to the Association, to the members of his immediate family, or contract purchasers who reside on the property, his right of enjoyment to the Common Area, Paths, Roads and facilities. 3.6 Reservation of Easements. The Declarant reserves the right to grant and/or dedicate an easement or easements in any location on, over or across any Road, Parking Area, Common Area, or Path for water, sewer, natural gas, electrical, fiber optics or cable TV for the installation, maintenance and repair of all such new or existing services and utilities. 3.7 Right of Access. The Association, First President, delegated representatives, or the Declarant shall have the irrevocable right to have access across any Road, Lot(s),Parking Areas, and Common Area to each building or Improvement from time to time during reasonable hours as may be necessary for the inspection, maintenance, repair, or replacement of any Improvements thereon in accordance with Sections 11.1, 11.4, 11.5, and 12.1. Such right of access therefore, shall be for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Committee approval and architectural controls in the subdivision. Except for improvements owned by the Association or used by the Association for its benefit or that of its members, all maintenance, repairs, or replacements on any Lot or on any structure thereon belonging to any Owner shall, as otherwise provided herein, be at the expense of the Owner thereof. A similar right of access shall also be reserved and be immediate for the making of emergency repairs therein in order to prevent property damage or personal ' injury. All damaged Improvements shall be restored to substantially the same condition in which they existed prior to the damage. All maintenance, repairs, and replacements of the Common Area,Paths, and Improvements shall be the common expense of the Association and all of the Owners; provided however, if such damage is caused by a negligent or tortuous act of any Owner, members of his family, his Occupant, agents, employees, invitee(s), or licensee(s), then such Owner shall be responsible'and liable for all such damage. 3.8 Underground Utilities. All lines, pipes, wires and all other improvements-relating to water, sewer, natural gas, power, cable TV and any and all other utilities and services must be buried underground except for the Improvements required to be above ground by the provider of the utility service. 3.9 Agricultural uses of neighboring_properties. Lot Owners in the subdivision are informed that adjacent uses maybe agricultural. Lot owners accept and are aware that 9 � a � standard agricultural and farming practices can result in dust, animal odors, flies,burning and machinery noise. Standard agricultural practices feature the use of heavy equipment, chemical sprays and the use of machinery early in the morning an sometimes late into the evening. ARTICLE IV rASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS 4.1 Membership. Every Owner of a Lot or building which is subject to assessment shall be a member of the Association. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of a Lot which is subject to assessment. Membership is automatically transferred on any sale of an Lot to the new Owner, The Declarant shall be the First President of the Association. 4.2 Votin . Within the Association each member shall be entitled to one vote for each Lot owned. It is estimated that there will be approximately eight (8) lots within the property, and therefore a potential for approximately eight (8) votes. When more than one person holds an interest in any Lot or building, Owners shall designate one person to be the agent for receiving notices hereunder, and for the purpose of voting. Each Lot Owner shall be responsible for advising the Association in writing of their current address and the person designated to vote. The Association shall be deemed to have complied with notice requirements and these covenants by mailing notice to the address of the designated Lot Owner which is on file in writing with the Association. The First President of the Association shall have the complete, final, and binding authority over all matters and decisions as necessary to carry out all the purposes of the association, until the total number of votes of the Association members has reached a total of five (5) or more votes, and until all the buildings are built in phase I. At this time the First President will resign, in writing, and relinquish his sole decision making authority over the Association. At this time the Association will elect a new President. The new President will not have the same power the First President had, and he will have 1 only one vote which will be equal to the one vote of any one member of the Association. A new President will be elected annually unless the Association chooses to elect the same President again. But, until such time as the First President resigns his position, if the First President is absent for any reason, then the remaining members of the Association are completely powerless to vote or decide on any issue whatsoever pertaining to the business of the Association. I� 4.3 Notice and Quorum For Any Authorized Action. During the development and building of the buildings, the presence of the First President is all that is necessary for final decisions to be made and a quorum will not be required. But as in paragraph 4.2, once construction of all buildings is complete and the First President resigns, then meetings shall require the presence of Association members entitled to cast a minimum of sixty six (66%)percent of all votes of the association. The presence of Association members entitled to cast sixty-six (66%)percent of all votes of the Association shall constitute a quorum. 10 1 r 4.4 Meetings. There shall be a minimum of two (2) meetings per year called by the First President or subsequent Presidents at a date, time, and place shall be determined by the President. The President of the association has the right to call as many meetings as he/she deems necessary in order to perform all the functions of the Association in an efficient and professional manner. 4.5 Hired Officers and Contractual Agreements. The First President and subsequently the Association shall have the authority to hire additional professional officers or other personnel which they deem necessary for the smooth, efficient, and professional functioning of the Association. It is the general intent of this paragraph that these professional officers or other personnel are hired because they serve some specific function which is not able to be professionally performed by a regular member of the Association. Although, if one of the Association members is professionally qualified to perform a specific function which the Association needs, then it is permissible for a member to also be hired on this specific professional capacity. Although, these hired officers or other personnel shall not have a vote, unless they are a member of the Association. They may include, but not be limited to the manager, secretary, treasurer, accountant, and maintenance personnel. The Association shall also have the authority to make contractual arrangements with outside entities, including but not limited to an attorney, accountant, engineer, maintenance contractors, and building contractors to provide for the smooth, efficient, and professional function of the Association. ARTICLE V ASSESSMENTS 5.1 Creation of Lien and Personal Obligation of Assessments The Declarant, for each Lot owned within the properties, hereby covenants and each Owner of any Lot by acceptance of a deed thereof, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association: , (1) Annual assessment or charges; (2) Special assessments; Such assessments are to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments shall be in charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees shall be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such property at the time when the assessment fell due. , 5.2 Purpose of Assessments. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation, health, safety, and welfare of the Owners of the property within the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER and the Association and for the improvement,repair, maintenance, and protection of the roads, Common Area, Paths, Parking Areas, Common Areas facilities. As such, these purposes 11 may also include,but shall not be limited to, funding for: the payment of taxes; the purchase of insurance for the Common Area and risks involving the Association maintenance (including snow removal) of roads,parking areas, utilities, streams, creeks, drainage ditches, ponds, paths, bridges and other improvements or easements owned by the Association or used by the Owners in common: the establishment, maintenance, and protection of pasture lands, crops, streams, creeks, drainage ditches,ponds, lagoons, timber, wildlife and animals within the property; the planting, cultivating, mowing, maintenance, harvesting and cutting of fields, grass, weeds or lands within the property; the construction, maintenance and repair of all Improvements, including buildings, structures, ponds, lagoons, drainage ditches, utilities,recreational facilities owned by the Association and constructed on the Common Area or elsewhere for the benefit of the Association; and the cost of labor, equipment, services, materials, management, protection and supervision of the assets and interests of the Association. 5.3 Annual Assessments. Annual Assessments shall be determined by the Association in an amount estimated to cover the normal operating expenses of the Association for each ' year as determined in conformity with standard accounting practices, together with such additional amounts as may, in their reasonable judgment,be necessary to cover any past deficits from operations or to create reasonable reserves for the future cost of operations ' of the Association. Annual assessments shall be apportioned among the individual Lot Owners according to the square footage of the Owner's building. Proximity to the Common Area,percentage of street use, or any other variables which may seem more or less favorable to an individual building Owner will not be valid in the determination of the annual assessments. 5.4 Special Assessments. In addition to an annual assessments to cover the Association's operating expenses, the Association,may levy, in any assessment year, special assessment(s) for the purpose of reserving or paying for, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair or replacement of a Capital Improvement of the Association upon the Common Area and Parking Areas including personal property related there on, and for such other purposes or projects benefiting the Association and its interests provided that any such assessments shall have the assent of two-thirds of the votes of the Association at a meeting called for this purpose. Nothing stated therein shall restrict the right of the Association to provide for the repayment of the j special assessment, and upon terms and conditions it deems appropriate, including the collection of interest on the deferred balance. 5.5 Notice and Quorum for Any Action Authorized Under Section 5.4. Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under Section 5.4 of Article V shall be sent to all members not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called, the presence of members entitled to case sixty six percent (66%) of all of the votes of the Directors shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be 1, called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meetings shall be one-half of the required quorum at the preceding meeting. No such i 12 subsequent meeting shall be held sooner than fifteen (15) days following the preceding meeting. 5.6 Uniform Rate of Assessment. Both annual and special assessments will be determined according to the square footage of the Owner's building. However, when in the judgment of the Association, a Capital Improvement is of a nature that uniquely restores damages or provides value only to certain individual Lot or building Owners then, to the extent determined by the Association that such Improvements are not beneficial to the Association as a whole or to the Owners of Lots or buildings in general, such portion of costs which solely contribute to those certain individual Lots or buildings may be pro-rated, scheduled and assessed among only those Owners of Lots or buildings ' affected. 5.7 Date of Commencement of Annual Assessment; Due Date. The annual assessments shall be assessed on a calendar year basis. The first annual assessment shall be adjusted according to the number of months remaining in the calendar year. The Association shall fix the amount of the annual assessment against each Lot or building at least (30)days in advance of each annual assessment period. Written notice of the annual assessment shall be sent to every Owner subject thereto. The due dates shall be established by the Association. The Association shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a ' certificate signed by the Association President or his representative setting forth whether the assessments on a specific Lot or building have been paid. 5.8 Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association. Any assessment not paid within thirty(30)days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at a rate of six (6)percentage points above the Prime Rate for Bank Lending in New York City. The Association may record a notice of lien against the property and bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the property in the same manner as a mortgage on real property, and the Association shall be entitled in any such actions or foreclosures proceedings to recover its costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his Lot. � 5.9 Subordination of Lien to First Mortgage. The lien of the assessments provided for i herein shall not subordinate to the lien of any first mortgage. Sale or transfer of any Lot shall not affect the assessment lien, whether such lien arises prior to such sale or transfer, or thereafter becomes due. 5.10 Declarant Assessments. For the purpose of assessments, any Lots owned by the Declarant shall be subject to the same assessments and provisions of these Articles as any other Owner. 13 r ARTICLE VI ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL 6.1 Intent. The architectural and design Covenants and guidelines which follow are intended to compliment the Bozeman Zoning Code and any future protective covenants which govern this Project, and to clarify the intention for the design of buildings for the Project. Specifically, these guidelines set forth design criteria which addresses the building design and location landscaping, lot density, and other improvements. The ' intent of these guidelines is to allow as much flexibility as possible while at the same time define a minimum level of quality and consistency of building design which will be consistent with and maximize the quality of the overall Project. The unique design elements of the Developer, Building Contractor, Architect, and Owners for both the landscaping and the buildings will be respected, and individual expression is encouraged, provided they are harmonious with the overall plan of the area and the Project. Except insofar as its duties may be extended with respect to a particular area by the Association, the Committee shall review and approve or disapprove all plans and specifications submitted to it for any proposed improvement. No construction or alteration of any improvement or any work affecting the external appearance of any improvement shall be made, erected, altered,placed or permitted to remain upon the Lot until a site plan, floor plans, elevations, trim details, specifications and landscaping showing the design, location, material(s), and color(s) together with the.name of the contractor shall have been submitted to and such site plan and specifications are approved in writing by the Committee. 6.2 Membership of Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. The Committee shall consist of three (3) members appointed by the First President. One (1) of the (3) members of the Committee shall be the First President. The second member shall be representative of the First President, and the third member shall be appointed by the First President. It is also suggested that at least one of the members of the Committee have professional qualifications in the area of architecture. In this regard, the First President may, as provided for in paragraph 4.5 of these Covenants,hire an architect to reside on the Committee in lieu of the third member of the Committee. 6.3 Standards For Review. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all proposed construction shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, National Plumbing Code and the National Electrical Code,NEPA, and the Design Guidelines. All plans must be harmonious with the overall plan for the development. All plans, materials and ' specification must be suitable to the site, adjacent properties and the neighborhood. All improvements must be compatible with the surrounding properties so as to not impair or degrade property or aesthetic values. f6.4 Approval or Dispproval by Architectural and Landscgping Review Committee. The Committee has fifteen (15) days to approve or disapprove the location, construction design, landscaping, and materials used for the building, This fifteen (15) day approval time period will not start until after the detailed site plan, floor plans, roof plans, trim details, project specifications, color samples, sample materials and landscaping plan have 14 • • all been submitted to the Committee. The Committee will then notify the Owner, in writing, of the date of the start of the fifteen (15) day approval period. If the Committee feels that insufficient plans, project specifications, color samples, sample materials or landscaping plans have been submitted either by the Lot owner or the Owners representative, then the fifteen (15)day time period will not begin until the Committee informs the Owner, in writing that all plans, samples, and materials provided are acceptable. As a protection to the Owner, if the Owner has been notified in writing by the Committee of the starting date of the fifteen (15) day approval period and the Committee does not respond with approval or disapproval by the end of the fifteen (15) day approval period, then the approval shall be deemed granted. Any plans, specification, samples, and proposals approved, either expressly in writing or by the expiration of the fifteen (15) day period hereinabove provided, shall then permit the Owner to commence construction in accordance with said plan,but any deviation from said plan which, in the judgment of the Committee, is also; a) a deviation of substance from either the Design Guidelines; b)the requirements of this Declaration; c) a detriment to the appearance of the structure or to the surrounding area shall be promptly corrected to conform with the submitted plan by the Owner or corrected by the Association at the Owner's expense as provided in sections 6.5 and 7.1 of these Covenants. 6.5 Inspection of Work. Upon the completion of any Improvement, if the Committee finds that such work was not done in strict compliance with all approved plans and specifications submitted or required to be submitted for its prior approval, it shall notify the Owner and the Association of such noncompliance, and shall require the Owner to , remedy the same. If,upon the expiration of(7) days from the date of such notification, the Owner has failed to commence to remedy such noncompliance, the Association shall determine the nature and extent of noncompliance thereof and the estimated cost of correction or removing the same (this (7) day period does not apply to any case as described in paragraph 11.11 which shall be subject to remedy within 2 hours of the infraction). The Association shall notify the Owner in writing of the estimated cost of correction or removal. The Owner shall then only have five (5) days to commence such remedy and thirty(30) days to complete such remedy. If the Owner still does not comply with the Association's ruling within five (5) day period, the Association, at their option, may either remove the non-complying improvement or remedy the non-compliance, and the Owner shall reimburse the Association upon demand for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Association, the Association shall levy an assessment and file a lien against such Owner and the Improvement in question and the land on which the same is situated for reimbursement and the same shall be enforced and/or foreclosed upon in the manner provided for by law for mortgages. The Committee may inspect all work in progress and give notice of noncompliance as provided above. 6.6 Design Submittal. It is suggested that the applicant submit a schematic set of drawings for review by the A.L.R.C. While this preliminary submittal is optional, it can be used by the applicant to determine aspects of the design that might be changed to assure later approval prior to the time and expense of a complete set of Construction Drawings. Following is the minimum Submittal required by the A.L.R.C.: 15 , • a) Site plans including landscaping, walks and decks. (Scale: 1/8"= IV' or similar engineering scale) b) Complete Construction Drawings—At least two (2) sets shall be submitted to the Committee for approval. This includes floor plans, exterior elevations of all sides, roof design, specifications and any construction details. Additional submittal elements may be requested by the Committee for clarification of the design if needed and shall be ' supplied by the applicant. (Scale '/4"= IV') c) Samples of all exterior materials with their respective color proposals in an adequate size to evaluate properly. The time allowed for review of the plans will be no longer than fifteen (15) days from the time all design submittal requirements are received by the.Committee. The time for plan review shall be adjusted accordingly if plans are submitted during any holidays. Approval of plan submittal shall require a majority by the Committee. d) A review fee will be required at the time of submission of all the design submittal documents and materials. The Owner shall submit the required design review fee to the Committee. It shall be the duty of the Association to establish the amount of the design review fee. The purpose of the design review fee shall be to defray the Association's cost of review of all proposed site plans and specifications submitted to them. 6.7 Start of Constriction. There shall be no construction work initiated without a building permit issued by the City of Bozeman and without written approval of the plans by the Committee. All building construction and landscaping must conform to both the final approved plans by the City of Bozeman and the Committee. If the Owner does not intend to start construction within three (3)months of purchasing the Lot, then permission in writing will need to be obtained from the Committee to suspend construction of their building until some future date. The Owner will be required to submit in writing a Lot maintenance program that is acceptable to the Committee. Such a program will minimally include but is not limited to killing and removing all existing weeds on the Lot, finish grading the lot if deemed necessary by the Committee,planting an acceptable seeding program as a new ground cover,providing a mowing maintenance schedule, mowing Lot in accordance to the maintenance schedule, and otherwise keeping the Lot in an attractive and presentable condition at all times. Storage of anything on the Lot during this time is completely forbidden: 6.8 Completion. All work on any improvement in the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property must be complete wotjom twelve (12) months of the date of commencement unless the Committee in writing agrees to an extension. '� 16 ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1 Enforcement. Violation by an Owner, Occupant, Licensee, Architect, or representative of the Owner of any restrictions, conditions, covenants or agreements herein contained shall give the Association, with reasonable notice, the right to enter upon the property concerned, and to summarily abate and remove at the expense of the Owner any erection, thing, or condition that may be in, or upon, said Lot,building, Common Area, road or right of ways contrary to the provisions hereof without being deemed guilty of trespass. The result of every act or omission whereby ant restrictions, condition, covenant, or agreement is violated in whole, or in part, is hereby declared to be and constitute a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law against a nuisance, either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result. The Association, or any Owner, shall have the right to enforce,by any proceeding at law or in equity,all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, fines and charges now or hereafter imposed. Failure by the Association or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. 7.2 Costs of Enforcement. Should any lawsuit or other legal proceeding be instituted by the Association against an Owner alleged to have violated one or more of the provisions of this Declaration and should the Association be wholly or partially successful in such proceeding, the offending Owner shall be obligated to pay the costs of such proceeding, including reasonable attorney's fees at both the trial and appellate level. 7.3 Severability. Invalidation of any of these covenants or restrictions by legal judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other*provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. 7.4 Amendment. Except those provisions requiring a greater consent, any , provision herein may be amended or revoked and additional provisions added, at any time by a written instrument recorded in the office of Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, duly signed and acknowledged by the Owners or record of not less than eighty(80) percent of the Lots subject to this Declaration. 7.5 Term. The provisions of this Declaration shall be binding for a term of , twenty five (25) years from the date of this Declaration, after which time the Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years not to exceed three (3) such extensions unless an instrument agreeing to amend, revoke or terminate this Declaration has been signed by the Owner's of eighty (80)percent of the Lots has been recorded. 17 r � • 7.6 Non-liability of Committee Members. Neither the Committee nor any member thereof,nor the Association nor any member thereof shall be liable to the Association or to any Owner or to any other person of any loss, damage or injury ansing out of or in any way connected with the performance of the Committee's or the ' Association's respective duties under this Declaration unless such loss, damage or injury is due to the willful misconduct of the Committee or its members or of the Association or its members. 7.7 Reservation of Authorit . Notwithstanding anything contained therein to the y g contrary, the Declarant hereby reserves all rights and authorities granted to him in this ! declaration, to the Association and to the Committee until such time as the Declarant waives such reservation of rights in a writing recorded at the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder's office. ARTICLE VIII SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICTS 8.1 Waiver Of Protest to Future S.I.D.(s). All Owners of Buildings will be required to sign waivers of protest on all future S.I.D.(s) which the City of Bozeman may require them to participate in. ARTICLE IX BUILDING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT 9.1 Intent of Design Criteria. The primary goal is to ensure that the proposed Project design including landscaping maintains or exceeds the general level of quality, size, appearance, and marketability. All initial or subsequent improvements to the privately owned Lots shall be subject to the following architectural and landscaping requirements and guidelines. Approval by the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER and Landscape review Committee shall be obtained prior to application to the City of Bozeman for a building permit. The submittal requirements for review by the A.L.R.C. are specified herein. The A.L.R.C. shall have no power to approve any structure failing ' to meet, at a minimum, the conditions set forth in this Declaration. 9.2 General Regulations. All lands within the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER are subject to the zoning regulations of the City of Bozeman except for any variances thereto granted by the City of Bozeman as shown on the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER plat as filed in the Gallatin County Courthouse on . As such variances to the zoning requirements of the City of Bozeman shall be specified on the final plat noted above or within the body of this Declaration. In addition to these Regulations,building design may be regulated by City, County, State and Federal regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. The Owner or his or her agent shall be responsible to ensure conformance with any applicable regulations and 18 i should check with the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, and State of Montana Building Codes Division to verify that the most recently adopted edition of any applicable regulation is being used. No construction of, or alteration to, any improvements, whether temporary or permanent, including but not necessarily limited to buildings, fences, walls, earthwork,paving, vegetation, signs,or secondary structures such as utility or trash enclosure, antennas and storage tanks shall be commenced on any lot prior to receiving the written approval of the A.L.R.C. and the City of Bozeman. Interior modification and/or improvements that do not alter the exterior appearance of a building, or the site improvements, shall not require the approval of the A.L.R.C. Although an Owner is responsible to check with the City of Bozeman to see if such interior modification and/or improvements requires their approval. 9.3 Density, Allowable Uses, Allowable Areas and Setbacks. a.)Density. The density of the NRPC P.U.D. shall be as follows: Overall land coverage by principal and accessory buildings shall not be more than 60 percent for commercial uses. The percentage of coverage is based on the total project, as the parking areas and open space are common area and not part of the lot as in a conventional subdivision. b.) Permitted Uses. Permitted Uses shall be as follows: principal uses: Essential services (Type I, see Bozeman Zone Code for definition) Medical Offices, clinics, and centers , Offices (professional offices and business headquarters) Conditional Uses: Day Care Centers Accessory Uses: Fences Tool sheds for storage of domestic supplies Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses. Signs, subjects to Chapter 18.65 pf the Bozeman Zoning Board Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work Parking areas C) Building Envelope or Buildable Area. Each lot in NR.PC the building , envelope determined on the site plan. All construction other than landscaping improvements shall be limited to this buildable area. The building will be subject to additional requirements elsewhere in this document. D) Building Setbacks. All buildings or structures shall have a setback shown on the site plan. Note that setbacks are created by the common open space of the P.U.D. and that the buildable area is defined by the lot and the landscape strip shown on the Final site plan. Additionally, a minimum 10' separation must occur between individual buildings 19 • on adjoining lots. Therefore, each building on adjoining lots must maintain a 5' setback J g g J g from the adjoining lot. 9.4 Height Limits. Maximum roof heights will be 38' with roof itches of 3/12 or � � P ' greater and 32' for buildings with flat roofs.or with roof pitches of less than 3/12. Measurement of building height shall be in the same manner as specified by the Bozeman Zone Code. ' 9.5 Minimum and Maximum Building Sizes. a) Minimum. 2400 Square Feet. b) Maximum. Limited by the parking calculations for square footages as set forth in this document allocating maximum square footage for the number of parking places provided for each lot and the maximum building coverage as set forth in section 9.3 a(above). 9.6 Buildings on Multiple Lots. A single building may be constructed on contiguous lots, but may not use more the 2 lots unless approved by the A.L.R.C. and the City of ' Bozeman's Design Review Board as having adequate massing delineation to address the increased linearity of the building. 9.7 Master Signage Plan. The signage plan for the P.U.D. incorporates 3 main elements. They are as follows: Planned Unit Development Identification Signs. These 3 signs are located at the 3 main entrances to the Development, located off Ellis Road. The locations are noted on the Final site plan and details are shown. Building Identification Signs. These signs are located on the interior street. The locations are noted on the Final site plan and details are shown. The information on the signs will be limited to the name of the building complex and the number range of the units serviced by that entrance. Unit Identification Signs. These would be individual signs foi each unit within the buildings showing the name of the particular business and the number of the unit. An example would be: Smith, Smith and Smith, C.P.A.'s, 404 Northern Rockies Drive. The wall signs for each unit will comply with the formulas set forth in Section 18.65 of the Bozeman Area sign code dated June 15, 2000. All signs must be approved by the A.L.R.C. and receive a permit from the City of Bozeman. 1 . 1 20 ARTICLE X BUILDING GUIDELINES 10.1 Intent and Design Theme. The intent of the following Building Guidelines is to provide for a degree of continuity throughout the built-up setting of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER without stifling personal taste in choice of building style. Furthermore, the intent is to establish minimum standards to ensure that , the type of building constructed is at least comparable to and blends with the eclectic styles of architecture found in the surrounding developments. The purpose of the design theme is to produce functional and cost effective structures that have a light commercial with residential accents character, including protected entrances, varying roof lines (including multiple roofs and dormers), exterior spaces such as decks. 10.2 Design Concepts. a) Articulation of main entrances. Each building shall have a clearly defined main entrance that is articulated by roof and building massing as well as landscaped design elements such as sidewalks, planting, lighting elements, etc. b) Orientation of buildings. Each building shall be oriented to the parking area provided for it in terms of egress and ingress. The building may be additionally oriented to views or to adjacent buildings for purposes of pedestrian circulation between buildings. Each building should be particularly sensitive to the pedestrian traffic between buildings and parking and relate well to the sidewalk required along the building side of the parking lots and shown on the Final P.U.D. plan. c) Scale and Massing of Buildings. Each building design must address the scale and massing not only of the particular building itself but also of adjacent buildings within the P.U.D. Each building will be reviewed by the A.L.R.C. on this basis. 10.3 Roofs. Roofs are a major element in the building design and therefore will be emphasized by the A.L.R.C. a) Shape and Form. It is the intention of these guidelines to require traditional gable, hip, and shed roof designs used in creative and aesthetically pleasing combinations. Potential flat roofs may be accepted by the A.L.R.C. Secondary roof forms are highly recommended in designs for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER. These are particularly useful to give proper scale to large roof masses: They can be particularly effective when special care is given to their massing and pattern. In addition,no roof ridgeline shall extend more than forty (40) feet without interruption by an intersecting roofline, secondary roof structure, or step down roof in order to break up the overall mass. 21 ROOF ARTICULATION MEASUREMENT CRITERIA tb) Pitches. The minimum roof pitch shall be 5:12 for the major components of any roof. Minor components and secondary roof structures, such as shed roofs and dormer roofs may have pitches as low as 4:12. No component of any roof shall have a pitch less than 4:12. Under certain special circumstances the roof design may incorporate as a minor component of the overall roof ' design a flat roof. Should the applicant demonstrate that a lesser pitch on the major components can achieve the desired results of these guidelines, the committee may approve the design solely at their discretion. However, the applicant will in that case be required to provide a conceptual submittal as described in the submittal requirement section of this document. c) Secondary Roof Structures. Dormers, skylights, chimneys and solar collectors are considered secondary roof structures. Dormers and most other secondary roof structures are encouraged,both to add interest and scale to major roof areas and to make habitable use of space within the roofs. Dormers and other secondary roofs may have gable, hip or shed forms and may be stacked in multiple forms. When designing the location of skylights, consideration should be given to both the interior and exterior appearance of the unit. Locations should also be coordinated with window and door locations. Skylights shall be located away from valleys, ridges and all other areas where drifting snow and snow ice may hinder the performance and safety of the unit. d) Eves, Soffits, and Fascias. All major roof components shall have a minimum horizontal eve projection of 18 inches measured from the finished wall. Minor roof structures may have a reduced eve projection as necessary to maintain proper proportion or for a specific architectural effect demonstrated to the Committee. Eves may have a 1 horizontal or angled return to the wall. Soffits shall be required to cover all rafter tails and rough framing material except where framing members are finished and protected from exposure. All roof edges shall have a minimum facia of 6 inches in height. For further illustration see drawing below. 10.4 Roofing Materials. Roofing materials enhance the building and need to be compatible with a residential neighborhood. The recommended roofing materials are natural cedar shakes or shingles, heavy gauge, high quality metal, or fiberglass composition shingles in an architectural grade. Other materials may also be considered, 1 but must have written approval from the A.L.R.C. 10.5 Gutters, Downspouts, and Flashing. Gutters and downspouts are allowed but they must be of a color and finish that blends with the finish colors of the structure. Unpainted gutters, downspouts or flashing will not be allowed unless made of copper. Flashing materials shall be of a copper or painted or anodized sheet metal. i 22 . r 10.6 Equipment and Ventilating Roof Projections. All roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into the overall roof design and screened. All roof mounted HVAC equipment will be screened from view with an architectural element consistent with the design of the building and oriented away from the street side of the building. All sewer, bath fan, hot ' water heater, stove, or other roof venting stacks shall be painted a color as similar as possible to the roof material color. Other non-roof mounted equipment shall likewise be screened from view either with architectural elements such as approved fencing or with ' the use of landscaping. 10.7 Exterior Walls. The exterior walls are one of the most important aesthetic elements ' on the building design and will reflect the image of the entire subdivision. Elements of specific concern are scale, proportion, texture and color. The scale and proportion of the exterior walls must have inherent interest and diversity, and harmonized with the high quality nature of the P.U.D. All buildings will be of new construction and there will be no log, manufactured, mobile,pre-assembled, or modular buildings allowed. a) Material. The materials that are acceptable to provide the desired look and textures r are real stone and brick, wood beams and siding which is painted or stained, and stucco. Color lock and vinyl siding may be acceptable provided it is of high quality and simulates wood materials faithfully, and the specific brand is approved by the A.L.R.C. Steel or aluminum siding, unless specifically approved by committee, standard usages of plywood siding, such as T1-11, and unnatural appearing simulated stone, brick or wood are unacceptable. Some simulated stone may be acceptable with approval by the A.L.R.C. The Committee will consider new building materials on the market that maintain the aesthetic character of the subdivision. b) Colors. The colors used must be muted earth tones and must also be considered to harmonize and compliment the surrounding site and neighboring buildings. Trim colors should demonstrate only subtle color changes from the main body of the building, unless demonstrated to the A.L.R.C. to be compatible with the character of the PUD. If the applicant can demonstrate to the A.L.R.C. that brighter trim and accent colors can meet the spirit of this document without detracting from the overall development, then the A.L.R.C. has the option of approving the proposed color scheme solely at their discretion. c) Concrete. Exposed concrete shall be limited to a maximum of 8 inches from the bottom of the siding to the finish grade. Exposures of more than 8 inches shall be covered by shrubs, masonry veneer, and texture concrete surface such as exposed aggregate or synthetic stucco. d) Wall Form. No wall shall consist of a single finish treatment for more than 28 horizontal feet without interruption by a wall projection. Window, wall corner, wall recess, porch or other architectural form that adds interest. r 23 • All windows shall be of double or triple glazing. Low "E" coatings are permitted but nomirror glazing shall not be allowed. All windows and sliding glass,French or atrium doors shall be aluminum clad wood. A specific brand of plastic windows may be approved by the Committee,but a sample will need to be produced to the Committee. Unclad custom-built windows for individual applications shall be trimmed and painted to ' appear the same as the other windows in the structure. The patterns, sizing, symmetry(or asymmetry) of windows and doors determines the scale and feel of the building. The Committee will require that the following aspects be carefully addressed in the window ' and door design. i ' 1) Consistency of types and shapes. 2) Special shapes used for"feature"windows in appropriate areas. 3) Use of window patterns consistent with the design and massing of the structure. 4) Consistent use of window forms in conjunction with adjacent window forms. 10.8 Parking. Each building is required to have the number of parking spaces required by the City of Bozeman Zoning Code. There will be absolutely no parking of cars, trucks, or any other vehicles in the street by Owners. Parking cars over-night in the parking areas is forbidden, except for those buildings with residential use. ARTICLE XI SITE DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES All site improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER A.L.R.C. prior to commencement of construction or alteration. Minor adjustments to the building and landscaping after initial construction shall not require submittal of plans. Minor adjustments shall include replacement of dead or dying vegetation and the addition of trees, shrubs or other landscaping features ' providing that such additions are consistent with the Site Development and Landscape Guidelines. 11.1 Driveway Culverts. All driveways and parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. Driveway culverts shall have attached flared ends of sheet metal or concrete construction. Culvert ends, not counting the flared ends, shall extend a minimum of 4 feet beyond the edge of the driveway. All culverts damaged by construction shall be replaced prior to final surfacing of the driveway. ' 11.2 Fences. One of the primary goals of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER is to create an atmosphere that is open and expansive. Because of the importance of this goal,perimeter lot fencing will not be allowed in this subdivision. Fencing for screening of loading areas and mechanical equipment should be only as high as necessary to screen the area or equipment in question, and will in no ' instance exceed 6' in height unless specifically approved in writing by the A.L.R.C. 24 i 11.3 Privacy Screening. Privacy screens will be allowed but must be constructed of wood siding(same as the main building), stucco, brick, or stone materials, and they shall be an integrated part of the main buildings. There shall be a size restriction. Plans for privacy screening must be submitted and approved by the A.L.R.C. 11.4 Exterior Lightin. . While lighting for safety and security is encouraged, the elimination of excessive light is of prime concern. All lighting for parking and driving ' areas shall be fully shielded as shown in the following example, and in no case shall exceed 20' in height. Additionally, all lighting for the buildings and walk areas shall be concealed or recessed into the structure where possible. Also, where wall mounted fixtures or ballard type lighting for pedestrian circulation areas are required, all lighting will be of a type that has the luminaire of the fixture shielded from view from any angle with the exception of the area intended to be illuminated. In no case shall lighting be of a type that is not consistent with light commercial development. Lighting for signage shall be limited to landscape type lighting. In cases where internal lighting of signs is required, the translucent lighted portion shall be the letters only and the background shall be dark. Only enough light shall come through the background to give a sense of the background color. 11.5 Utilities. All utilities including,but not limited to, natural gas, electricity, telephone, fiber optics, and cable TV shall be located underground. 11.6 Mail Boxes. Mailboxes shall be designed in accordance with the U.S. Postal Service regulations and approved by the local Postmaster as shown on the site plan. 11.7 Temporary Structures. No temporary structures, trailers, campers, motor buildings, tents, shacks, or similar structures shall be used at any time on the lot. , 11.8 Construction Material: Cleanup and Debris. A list of acceptable procedures and guidelines will be given to the Owner prior to actual construction commencing and will require the written acceptance of compliance by the Owner prior to starting construction or construction will not be approved. Construction materials shall not at any time prior to or during construction be placed or stored in the street or placed anywhere else so as to impede, obstruct or interfere with pedestrians within the street right of way. Absolutely all construction materials shall be removed from the entire Lot within thirty(30) days of substantial completion of construction. Construction sites shall be kept clean,neat and well organized at all times. Any construction debris shall be the responsibility of the Building Contractor and Owner and shall be kept clean and properly stored on a daily basis. If construction debris blows onto another Owners lot it is the responsibility of the Owner's contractor to clean it up immediately. Of particular concern to the Declarant is street cleanliness. Any , 25 r � , construction debris, and especially dirt, gravel,rocks, and concrete which find their way into the street, shall be removed immediately(within 60 minutes of the start of the infraction) from the street and be brought back to a broom clean condition or clean up costs and a fine may be levied and enforced as in Sections 6.5 and 7.1 of this Declaration. Owners are highly encouraged to notify their building contractors of this important rcondition prior to signing their construction contract with them. 11.9 Solid Waste Containers. Dumpster enclosures shall be designed in the same style ias the main buildings. If the enclosure is designed to match the building(s) served, it shall be approved in writing by the A.L.R.C. All enclosures shall have an impervious floor. All solid waste containers must be stored in their enclosures except during reasonable periods prior to and after pickup, and only on day of pickup. 11.10 Sims. Signs shall not be permitted on the private, public, or commonly owned lands within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER except as follows: Signs shall comply to the Master sign plan addressed in section 9.7. 11.11 Landscaping. Landscaping will be required to enhance the value of the property and the aesthetics of the site. The entire site shall be landscaped, including up to the actual edge of the road, and all owners are required to maintain their grounds. ' Landscape, grading and irrigation plans shall be submitted and approved by the Committee concurrently with all structural building plans. In locating bushes and trees consideration must be given to surrounding neighbors concerning view corridors and sun penetration to their site. Rock and Gravel type ground covers will not be allowed as landscaping. Certain types of gravel and rock ground covers will be allowed for certain specific non-landscaping uses. All such uses must be approved by the Committee. This limitation does not apply to specific large rocks or rock clusters being used in an artistic manner. Owners shall maintain the transition from the formal landscaping around the buildings and the Open Space areas will be maintained to a lesser degree according to the ' Open Space Management Plan. Where lawn is planted, an underground sprinkler system will be required. 11.12 Landscaping_Maintenance. Lawns and landscaping shall be maintained in a manner which shall not detract from the appearance and value of adjoining Lots or diminish the aesthetics of the subdivision. Infractions will be dealt with as defined in paragraphs 6.5 and 7.1 of these Covenants. 11.13 Landscaping Requirements for Individual Buildings. Each proposed building will ' provide a landscape plan for the review committee of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owner's Association. This plan will show all foundation and perimeter plantings, irrigation system plans, sidewalks, and other landscape elements. For every 3 linear feet of foundation wall, the owner will be required to provide and plant as a minimum 1 small ornamental tree, 1 evergreen shrub, or 1 deciduous shrub as defined in the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This landscape plan 26, r will be designed to soften the transition between the building and the landscaped lot and � g P will be consistent with the approved landscape plan of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER. There will be a minimum of 6 trees required per Lot, and all trees will be a minimum of ten (10') feet in height. Trees are encouraged to be planted in clusters rather than in ' regular intervals around the property. Shrubs and flowers can be used to provide a transitional mass from the tree clusters to the lawn surfaces. Deciduous trees and shrubs can be placed on the southern and western sides to provide shade in the summer months i and allow sun to penetrate in the winter months. Suggested deciduous trees are Aspen, European Green Birch, Rocky Mountain and Big Tooth Maple, and others recommended by the City of Bozeman Code. Suggested evergreen trees are Douglas Fir, Lodge Pole ' Pine, Engleman, and White Spruce, Subalpine Fir and Scotch Pine. Additionally for each building built directly adjacent to another building, the landscape plan shall denote 1 large canopy tree for every 30' of adjacency. In the event that a large tree is inappropriate, 2 small ornamental trees may be substituted. Definitions for plantings will be from the Bozeman Zoning Code. Each building will be required to provide a substantial landscape strip between the building and the sidewalk along the parking. In no case shall the width be less than 4 ' feet, with the exception of those places where the sidewalk abuts the entrances. Each building will provide a bicycle rack consistent with the following detail or an alternate design approved by the A.L.R.C. 11.14 Numbering System of Buildings. 1 r r r 1 I i r 1 27 , ARTICLE XH OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN 12.1 Intent. This declaration provides the authority for this Open Space Management Plan through the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision Lot Owners Association. The intent of the Open Space Management Plan is to provide for the management, maintenance, implementation, and protection of the Common Open Space within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property. The intent of the Open Spaces is to provide: a) a general feeling of openness ' b) a buffer zone between lot clusters, c) corridors for paths The following Open Space management standards apply to the Open Space lands in the property within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 12.2 Open Space. The project has 3 levels of space: Public Space, constituted by the roads and pedestrian system. Private Space, constituted by the lots and buildings within the P.U.D., and those areas immediately adjacent to buildings not served by elements such as pedestrian facilities or recreational elements such as benches or picnic tables. Semi-Public Spaces, such as parking lots, which are intended for the users of the offices within the P.U.D. as well as their guests. 12.3 Landscaping. Landscaping plantings shall feature native species but may incorporate non-native and ornamental species of trees and shrubs. The dominant theme ' for landscaping shall be large open grassy areas with clusters of trees, to create visual backdrops and vegetated islands requiring little maintenance. ' 12.4 Maintenance Practices. The president shall determine frequency and schedule of all open space maintenance practices. 12.5 Noxious Weeds. Noxious weeds shall be controlled on all common open space areas. The preferred method is by introduction of desirable plant species that eliminate weeds. Interim measures permitted include herbicide applications,mowing and ' biological control. All herbicide applications shall be conducted according to applicable State laws. ' 12.6 Animal Control. Domestic pets shall not be allowed at any time in the open space areas or paths unless on a leash. Temporary fencing around shrubs and trees to prevent animal depredation shall be permitted for the period of time necessary to ensure survival of the plantings. 28 r+ Rodents may be controlled if levels of depredation threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. If poisons are used they shall be applied only n accordance with applicable State laws. , Pesticides may be used to control insect populations that are a nuisance, threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. Pesticides may be applied only in ' accordance with applicable State laws. 12.7 Additional Restrictions. , a) All buildings shall be prohibited in the common open space areas except structures related to the function and intent of the common areas. b) Motorized vehicles are prohibited within the common open space areas except for maintenance and construction of landscaping, facilities or structures related to the function or intent of the open spaces. c) No open burning of privately generated debris shall be permitted on commonly held open spaces. Open burning of debris generated from the commonly held spaces may be allowed in accordance with local burning regulations,but only by someone authorized by the Board. Individual lot owners shall not be ' allowed to burn in either their private property or in the common open spaces. 12.8 Road and Sidewalk Management Plan. The intent of this section is to NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owners Association to establish a maintenance plan for the commonly owned vehicular and pedestrian facilities within the subdivision. The purpose of the management plan shall be to provide for the long term maintenance, reconstruction and replacement of all street and sidewalk surfaces located in the common area in the subdivision. , The Association shall accept ownership and maintenance of all streets and sidewalks when constructed to the standards approved on the final plat for the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. The ' NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owners Association shall have no authority, duty or right to obstruct, delay or harass the Declarant in regards , to additions to or extensions of streets or sidewalks that are approved by the City of Bozeman. The Association, acting for the Association, shall establish a plan for long term maintenance of all roads and sidewalks. The Association shall also establish a plan for the day to day maintenance of the roads and sidewalks. In accordance with such plans, the Association shall see to it that the sidewalks and roads are maintained, cleaned and snowplowed in a timely fashion. ' The Association shall hire contract services for road, sidewalk and driveway maintenance. , The Association shall have the authority to assess the Lot Owners for services rendered in maintaining and repairing all streets and sidewalks as specified in Article 5, titled Assessments. 29 , 1 � r 4 i '.r a MID .. �•I♦ o.✓y r✓l� P "4tTt • tI MIMI�WY r � 1"J'h` +�' �i.� � •`�'/t�� 5SF �'�L .r�.af `�' Gall loW +I I i I 1.UMEC I DMS5OLuminaire I ( I I The DMS50 luminaire consists of a 2 3/8°(60 mm) 2 3/8°(60 mm) _ sealed optical chamber made of a hydro Insertion outside diameter outside diameter Insertion • formed reflector permanently sealed on tube adaptor r1 of tenon tube adaptor r-1 Domus Series DMS501m and an injected refractor,with internal prisms 2•(51 mml of to n DMS6OTm luminaires incorporate a only(SHAISSA optics).SCB/SHB optics 2'15> SealsafWm sealed optical chamber. use a tempered-glass lens. A toolfree lamp access shutter and E E SealsafeTm optical system sleeve,with self-adjusting injection- E E This hermetically sealed chamber molded silicone gasket,keep the protects the optical system and optical chamber hermetically sealed. 3 — produces a lower Light Loss Factor The optical system is placed in a cast- (LLF)than conventional optical aluminum technical ring,which is systems,while maintaining the assembled in a spun and cast-aluminum E ^ E , 271/2' ;E luminaire's photometric housing suspended under a cast alu — - (698 mm) ^E performance. minum fitter. — —= A large,bell-shaped spun-aluminum Maintained photometric performance skirt is mechanically assembled to the I z71/2" The lower LLF also translates into technical ring. (698 mm) lower initial lam wattage, d The DMS50 luminaire is UL and CSA EPA:1.35 sq.ft. EPA:1.00 sq.ft. p wa ge,reuc- ing the electrical consumption of approved. Weight:42lbs(19.1 kg) Weight:42lbs(19.1 kg) the luminaire.The absence of external prisms makes the refractor DMS50-SHA/SSA DMS50-SHB/SCB and lens surface self-cleaning, minimizing the deterioration of the optical system. Lamp GuideOptical r t I Both SHA and SSA Sealsafe optical DMS50/60 ° chambers deliver exceptional Wattage. SHA/SSA SCB SHB SHA&SSA optics IF extruded bent section of a Sealed optical chamber extruded aluminum 2 3/8" photometric performance thanks 70 MH,medium — — — consisting of a reflector (60 mm)O.D.,mechani- to their combination of state-of-the- 100 MH,medium — — — permanently assembled on cally assembled to the art reflector and refractor,which 175 MH,mogul — — — top of a prismatic refractor. side of a pole. minimizes glare. 250 MH,mogul — — SHAW: Asymmetrical hyperextensive(III) LM A 1800 bent section of With their combination of state- 400 MH,mogul N/A W •° SHA4L: Asymmetrical hyperextensive(IV) extruded aluminum 2 3/8" of-the-art reflector and tempered 70 HPS,mogul — — — (60 mm)O.D.,welded SSA3M: Asymmetrical semi cut-off(III) to a cast-aluminum pole • glass lens,SHB and SCB Sealsafe 100 HPS,mogul — — — pq p In the above optics,the sleeve and shutter adaptor and a flat rolled optical:chambers offer exceptional 150 HPS,mogul — — — p photometric performance as well. permit exact of lamp. _ aluminum spiral. 250 HPS,mogul — — N/A SHA&SSA refractors available in: Ease-of-maintenance 400 HPS,mogul N/A • N/A MM A 2 3/8'"(60 mm)round Tool-free access to the lamp via ACDR: Acrylic(175 W max.) — aluminum arm welded a sleeve and shutter,and a ballast Remote ballastin mounting orpole base PC: Polycarbonate to a 41/2"(114 mm)O.D. Requiresapolycarbonaterefractor.. 9 pole adaptor.The moun- r tray that slides inside a ballast box, 7 Re uiresa reduced jacket lamp. Add suffix to optical system code.. 9 1 P ting is complete with contribute to the ease of mainte- DMS50Tm and DMS60rm Domus Series _ two bent decorative rods, nance characteristic of Domus luminaires accommodate H.I.D.or SCB&SHB optics spheres and a cast-alu- Series. incandescent lamps as shown in 4, Sealed optical chamber minum luminaire adaptor. the above table. consisting of a reflector per- All this performance is incorpo manently assembled on top NM A 1801 bent section of rated in stylish,well-designed units HPS ballasts feature a-40F°(-40C°) -` of a tempered-glass sag lens. r� extruded aluminum 2 3/8" that makes Domus luminaires ideal lamp starting capacity with a high (60 mm)O.D.,with cast- for contemporary landscapes power factor of 90%and operate within SC63M: Asymmetrical cut-off(III) aluminum decorative and buildings. ANSI trapezoidal limits.MH ballasts SHB3M: Asymmetrical hyperextens•Ive(111) � spirals,and a pole adap feature a-20F°(-30C°)lamp starting (notavailablewitlt250WHPs) tor.The mounting slip fits Lumital surface treatment capacity with a high power factor of p �. All luminaires,mountings and 90%.All ballasts are UL recogniied , In the above o tics,the sleeve and shutter into a 4"(102 mm)pole. permit exact positioning of the lamp. poles are protected by the LumitalTM and CSA certified. OM Two straight 1 5/8" surface treatment,which involves The ballast is integrated in the hood (Lamps not included) _ (41 mm)O.D.aluminum of the luminaire while the unitized For further information,referro the side arms welded to the chemical preparation of all Outdoor Lighting Application Guide. —� a 4""(102 mm)round 'e surfaces prior to the application ballast tray slides into a ballast box aluminum pole adaptor of a coating of polyester-based that is mechanically assembled onto textured powder for superior the optical support plate. , and to a cadaaluminum luminaire ada resistance. ptor. RM A 3/8"(60 mm)0.D. aluminum arm welded to a 4"(102 mm)round pole adaptor and a cast-alu- minum luminaire adaptor, with decorative half- sphere.A structural 1/2"" • (13 mm)rod is welded to the arm and pole adaptor. Ordering Sample Lamp Luminaire Optical System Voltage Mounting&Configuration Pole Finish Options 100HPS F DMS50 SHA3L-ACDR 120 IF-lA R80-15 I GNTX FS-LR ° Lumec reserves the right to substitute materials or change the manufacturing process of its products without prior notification. r Panted jn Canada. DMS60 Luminaire The DMS60luminaire consists of a 27 1/2° 23/e° mm) sealed optical chamber made of a hydro- (698 mm) outside diameter P Y tube adaptor n Insertion formed reflector permanently sealed on of tenon an injected refractor,with internal prisms �2°(51 mm) I only(SHA/SSA optics).SCB/SHB optics use a tempered-glass lens. c cS E A toolfree lamp access shutter and o a E sleeve,with self-adjusting injection- E E molded silicone gasket,keep the E optical chamber hermetically sealed. o The optical system is surrounded by a one-piece,two-arm,cast-aluminum E i 27 1/2' i z,E cradle welded to the bottom piece (698 mm) E of a cast-aluminum technical ring. A large aluminum hood and a deflector are mechanically assembled on the top part of the technical ring. A large,bell-shaped spun-aluminum U Insertion depth EPA:1.00 sq.ft. g P p 41/8°0 I.D. of tenon Weight:421bs(19.1 kg) skirt is mechanically assembled to the (105 mm) 4°002 mm) bottom section of the technical ring. EPA:1.82 sq.ft. DMS50-SCB/SHB-FB The DMS60luminaire is UL and CSA Weight:401bs(1B.1 kg) ' DMS50 with SHAMA optics approved. and a flat base spinning(FB) DMS60-SHA Configurations ' rFinishes Luminaire Options p 16 Standard Colors Available FS Fusing(consult Lumec) �—0 o 0 12 1A 2 2A 3.66 The specially-formulated textured(TX) HS House shield Lumital powder coat is available in a FB Flat base spinning range of 16 standard colors.This unique Al 10 coating of thermosetting polyester resins A 3.05 provides a highly-durable UV-resistant rle Options 3 39 4 exterior finish as per ASTM 137. HB Hinged base Lumital coatings are specially formulated (APR4&APS4 poles only) •0 6 for outstanding salt-spray resistance 2.44 according to ASTM B117 standards. DR Duplex receptacle M (120 volts only) All surfaces are chemically treated using GFI* Duplex receptacle with 6 a four-step(aluminum)or six-step(steel) ground fault interrupter Typical wall mounting detail 1m process prior to painting.Consult Lumec (120 volts only) for Domus luminaire mountings for complete specifications. pH Photoelectric cell 3�4' U122 SC--Special Color LS* Provision for loudspeaker outlet d �nm;A 2•x3•(51 x 76 mm) Provide a 4"(102 mm)square color chip. 1 horizontal junction box - BA Banner arm (by other) wa iIt is possible to order smaller minimal IF Interior paint(pole only, �. E bracketquantities of powder paint at a q P P consultfactoryforapplicablepoles) premium.Your representative will be able to tell you if a powder coating can LBC Optional base cover i be developed for your project. Consult factory for feasibility with r oo cast-aluminum shafts. r� o Lumiseal,a biofriendly reactive r m organic conversion coating,is applied Base coverfor APR4&SPR4 poles only y APR4 APR4 SM6 R80 � on all aluminum parts that are subject (replace standard base cover). &LBC2 &TBC1 7/8'j22mm) a_� a_b to salt-spray corrosion.Consult Lumec Max.bolt Q Q i for complete specifications. projection b�tl b.,."tl t__>f v_d Please note that where quantities fa Accessdoor� Bc:63/4• BC:63/4• BC:101/2• 6c:121/2" do not warrant it,Lumec reserves(171 mm) (171 mm) (267mm) (318mm) the right to use an oven-cured liquid LBC2 LB C3 polyurethane finish. LBC1 Consult the Pole Guide for details Consult the Pole Guide for details and the complete line ofmountings. and the complete line of poles. B104 640 LBC4C/S LBC9 f . Registered Lumec inc. I � DMS50 Luminaire with Segmented Cut-off Optics The DMS501uminaire can accomodate SG and SE segmented optical systems. 2 3/8'(60 mm) 2 3/8'(60 mm) outside diameter Insertion outside diameter Insertion ,\ Toolfree access to the interior of tube adaptor r 1 of tenon tube adaptor r� of tenon The Luminous Dome(LD)and the luminaire permits easy access 2'(51 mm) 2'(51 mm) Luminous Ring(LR)options are to the lamp. :1 :1 only available with the SE and The optical system is placed in a SG optical systems. cast-aluminum technical ring,which •E E is assembled in housinghousing. Domus Series DMS50TM and g' ' a E = E A SLG sag lens or DL drop lens is — 0MS60TM luminaires can incorpo- required with SE optical systems. E rate SG and SE optical systems. Segmented optical system E The large SG cut-off optical system 1 271/2' 1 ;E *E yields excellent optical performance (698 mm) E 271/2°with maximum light control while the — (698 mm) smaller SE cut-off optical system EPA:1.00 sq.ft. EPA:1.20 sq.ft. provides different distributions. Weight:42lbs(19.1 kg) Weight:42lbs(19.1 kg) Ease-of-maintenance Tool-free access to the interior of DMS50-SE-SLG DMS50-SG-DL the housing via a latch,contributes DMS50 with SE optics and a sag lens(SGL) DMS50 with SG optics and a drop lens(DL) to the ease of maintenance char- acteristic of Domus Series. Lumital surface treatment Lam' Guide OpticalSystems LuminaireOptions All luminaires,mountings and DMS50/60 SG optics FS Fusing(consult Lumec) poles are protected by the Lumitaltr" Wattage SG SE Eaal Segmented cut-off reflector HS House shield(SG optics only) surface treatment,which involves 70 MH,medium — — system set in faceted arc the chemical preparation of all 100 MH,medium — — image duplicating patterns DL Polyca drop lens (SG or SEE optics a ptics only,250W max.) surfaces prior to the application 175 MH,mogul — — SG1: Asymmetrical(1) (250W remote ballast) of a coating of polyester-based 250 MH,mogul — — SG2: Asymmetrical(II) SLG Tempered glass sag lens textured powder for superior 400 MH,mogul •' •' (SG or SE optics only) resistance. SG3: Asymmetrical(111) (Standard when used with SE optics) 7o HPS,mogul — — SGQ: Symmetrical(V) LD Luminous dome 100 HPS,mogul — — SGFM: Forward-throw (available with SG optics only) 150 HPS,mogul — — Not available in 200,250 and 400W. (Maximum 25OW-remote ballast) 250 HPS,mogul — N/A LR Luminous ring 400 HPS,mogul • N/A SE optics (available with SG optics only) • Remote ballast in mounting orpole base Small hydroformed cut-off (Maximum 250W-remote ballast) Requires a reduced jacket lamp. reflector system set in FB Flat base spinning DMS50'rm and DMS60"m Domus Series faceted arc-image duplicating patterns. luminaires accommodate H.I.D.or incandescent lamps as shown in SE3: Asymmetrical(1) the above table. Not available in 200,250 and 400W. HPS ballasts feature a-40F°(-40C°) SE5: Symmetrical IV) lamp starting capacity with a high Please consult factory for details. power factor of 90%and operate within (Clear lamps not included) ANSI trapezoidal limits.MH ballasts For further information,refer to the feature a-20F°(-30C')lamp starting Outdoor Lighting Application Guide. capacity with a high power factor of 90%.All ballasts are UL recognized To achieve a high level of and CSA certified. DMS50 Luminaire with luminous options customer satisfaction,Lumec The ballast is integrated in the hood designs and manufactures of the Iuminaire. 2 3/8'(60 mm) Insertion 2 3/8'(60 mm) Insertion products according to the outside diameter r� of tenon outside diameter r� of tenon 2°(51 mm) 2'(51 mm) tube adaptor tube adaptor _ most stringent standards. - ISO 9002 ] ] E The quality management E " E 'e o v E o f system of Lumec is registered to ISO 9W2-94. E E 640 Cure-Boivin E Boisbriand,Quebec i z71/z° Canada,J7G 2A7 _ Isla mm) Tel:(450)430-7040 (69 9 m8 mm) • Fax.:(450)430-1453 www.lumec.com EPA:1.20 sq.ft. EPA:1.20 sq.ft. Weight:42lbs(19.1 kg) Weight:42lbs(19.1 kg) DMS50-SG-LR-DL DMS50-SG-LD DMS50 with SG optics, DMS50 with SG optics, Genlyte Thomas Group LLC a luminous ring(LR)and a drop lens(OL) and a luminous dome(LD) NORTHERN ROCKIES PUD Review Time Frame STEP 1 Infrastructure (i.e., water, sewer, sidewalks, Depends on Applicant streets) required by the Subdivision PUD must be installed or improvements must be secured with a signed Improvements Agreement and a Letter of Credit or a Certificate of Deposit. STEP 2 Final Plat for the Subdivision PUD and the Final Plat 45 days Final Plan (including 3 copies of the Final Plan 2-3 weeks Architectural Guidelines) for the Zoning PUD must be filed concurrently. STEP 3 Upon Final Plan approval an Informal 3-4 weeks application for a Minor Site Plan or a Major Site Plan may be submitted. STEP 4 Formal application may be filed for a Minor Minor Site Plan 4-6 weeks Site Plan or Major Site Plan for individual lot (<15,000 gross sq.ft. or <40 review upon Final Plat approval for the parking spaces) subdivision. Major Site Plan 10-12 weeks STEP 5 Submit a Final Site Plan that addresses all 2-3 weeks conditions of approval for a Minor or Major Site Plan application. STEP 6 Infrastructure must be completed for the Depends on Applicant subdivision. STEP 7 Submit a Building Permit application once the 2-4 weeks (depends on infrastructure and street improvements have Building Department review been installed, certified, inspected and schedule) accepted by the City of Bozeman and the Final Site Plan for the Minor or Major has been approved. I J .�, CITY 01050ZEMAN 802 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT U 9� * Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 c e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@boze*man.net car 83 0? Bozeman Montana 59771-1230 P �p co.0 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net April 19, 2001 Campbell/Lusin, LLC 3499 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies PUD #P-0047 and #Z-00171 Dear Mr. Campbell: At its March 23, 2001 meeting the Bozeman City Commission voted 5-0 to conditionally approve the Major Subdivision and Major Site Plan applications to divide 7.7 acres into 7 lots for a medical office and professional office Planned Unit Development. The proposal was evaluated against the review criteria and requirements of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, Bozeman Area Master Plan Update and the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The Commissions decision was based on the fact that, with conditions, the proposal will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and the Bozeman Area Master Plan. The decision of the,City Commission is final. The conditions for approval are as follows: Northern Rockies Major Subdivision PUD #P-0047 1. Corrections and/or explanations shall be provided for the following sections of text within the Architectural Guidelines: a) the architectural guidelines refer to lot coverage not exceeding 60% and the site plan clearly depicts the building envelope of each site exceeding 60%, page 17; b) the architectural guidelines shall note that all signs are subject to the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, page 17; c) total signage permitted per building and the maximum size of each sign shall be in compliance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, page 18; and d) the only uses identified under the PUD have been general offices, medical offices and daycare facilities, any other uses shall be identified prior to final plat (page 25 addresses overnight parking for residential uses). .2. Street lights shall be provided along Ellis Street and shall comply with the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SIDs) for the following: a. Signalization improvements to the intersection of Ellis Street and Highland Boulevard. b. Highland Boulevard improvements. C. A city-wide Parks Maintenance District. The document filed shall specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the Developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development or a combination thereof. 5. The following specific items should be taken into account in development of a storm water master plan: a. A significant grade differential should be avoided between the proposed structures, storm water retention/detention ponds, and sidewalk adjacent to Ellis Street. b. If retention facilities are not a viable option, detention facilities should be considered as an alternative. C. Ellis Street gutter capacities and ultimate storm water drainage destinations should be included in development of the master plan. d. Storm water drainage facility locations should be coordinated with landscape planning so that trees and shrubs which do not proliferate in standing water are located outside of designated retention ponds. 6. To avoid future street cuts, a 12-in diameter (min) RCP stub shall be provided across Ellis Street (approx. station 3+00) from the proposed catch basin inlet for connection to a future catch basin inlet. 7. Based on the City of Bozeman Water Facilities Master Plan, proposed water line extensions along Ellis Street shall be a minimum.diameter of 10-in. Proposed water line extensions within the development shall be a minimum diameter of 8-in. 8. The developer will be required to dedicate to the City of Bozeman one-half of a 60-foot right-of-way (30-feet) for Ellis Street. At a minimum, Ellis Street shall be designed to a full local street standard and constructed to a 32-feet width with curb, gutter, and Page 2 sidewalk on the south side extending from the intersection with Highland Boulevard to the east property line of the proposed development. 90 The developer's engineer shall submit plans and specifications to the City Engineering Office outlining the improvements necessary on Highland Boulevard to accommodate southbound left-hand turning movements from Highland Boulevard onto Ellis Street. The design shall account for existing improvements and right-of-way, and meet the minimum American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) geometric design requirements. The Plans and Specifications will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Office, and they must be approved prior to construction of the improvements. The required improvements shall be completed or financially guaranteed prior to final plat approval. No building permits will be issued prior to City of Bozeman acceptance of said infrastructure improvements. 10. Stop signs shall be provided at the intersections of the private drives with Ellis Street. 11. As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. 12. The final plat and the bylaws shall contain a note stating that the streets within the subdivision are private and the lot owners are responsible for all maintenance, upkeep and repair. 13. Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. 14. The covenants shall be recorded with the final plat which specifically includes the provisions from Section 16.34.030, as well as provisions for property owner's association maintenance, upkeep and repair of all applicable open space, landscaping within the required yard setbacks, interior street lighting, parks areas, park area landscaping, pedestrian facilities, snow removal and storm water facilities. 15. The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The final plat application shall include two (2) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 31h-inch floppy disk; and five (5) paper prints. 16. The developer shall have three (3) years from the date of Preliminary Plat approval to complete the conditions of preliminary plat approval and apply for Final Plat approval. Page 3 At the end of this period the governing body may, at the written request of the subdivider, extend its approval for no more than one (1) calendar year, as outlined in Section 16.10.050.J of the Subdivision Regulations. 17. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. 18. The plans and specifications for the project infrastructure must be adequately dimensioned and clearly indicate the extent of all improvements proposed for each phase. The plans must clearly show the location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer/water mains and easements, as well as nearby and proposed fire hydrants. All infrastructure improvements required for the development including water and sewer main extensions, public streets, curb and gutter, sidewalks and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be constructed or financially guaranteed prior to final plat approval. No building permits within any phase of development will be issued prior to completion and City of Bozeman acceptance of said infrastructure improvements for that phase. 19. All submittals must be adequately dimensioned. A legend of all pertinent line types and symbols used shall also be provided. 20. Storm water Master Plan: A Storm water Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention/detention basin location(s), and show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the storm water receiving channel(s). The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site(s), drainage ways, and finished lot grades), typical storm water retention/detention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations, and a storm water maintenance plan. Any storm water ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the park or open space. Storm water ponds for runoff from subdivision improvements (i.e., public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements upon Page 4 privately owned lots, unless approved by the Governing Body under the project review and approval process. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention/detention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the Final Site Plan for each lot. 21. Storm water retention and detention improvements shall be included on the landscaping plan. 22. Easements for the water, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from edge of easement. 23. The Developer's engineer shall be required to prepare a comprehensive Design Report addressing existing capacity of sewer and water utilities and the demands of the proposed development. The report must include hydraulic evaluations of each utility for both existing and post-development demands. The report findings must demonstrate adequate capacity to serve the full development. If adequate water and/or sewer capacity is not available for development, the report must identify necessary water system and/or sewer system improvements required for full development. Capacity limitations exist in sewer mains downstream from the proposed development. The Design Report must specifically address the hydraulic capacity of the existing downstream City sewer mains with respect to the anticipated loading from the proposed development. 24. Plans and specifications for the sewer and water main extensions, prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) licensed in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Sewer and water main plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). The Applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans, specifications, and shop drawings have been approved by the City and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. 25. Sewer and water services shall be approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the Applicant. Where services cross under retention ponds and/or culverts, adequate cover shall be maintained. 26. Plans and Specifications for any required fire service lines must be prepared in Page 5 accordance with the City's Fire Service Line Policy by a PE, and be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. 27. Prior to issuance of building permits for each lot, Pretreatment Program Sanitary Sewer Surveys shall be submitted to the Engineering Department and, if required under the City's Pretreatment Program, the developer shall install individual sewer service sampling manholes. 28. Plans and specifications for the Ellis Street improvements, prepared by a PE licensed in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. 29. The drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard non- residential driveway approach (City of Bozeman Standard Drawing No. 02529-11). 30. The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Soil Conservation Service, MDEQ, and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained by the Applicant and copies provided to the City Engineering Department prior to approval of the related plans and specifications or construction of the intended work. Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 1. The subdivision shall provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 2. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 4. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. Page 6 Standard Conditions for Approval: 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 8. The amount of storm water detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be.recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the commencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of Planning Department approval. 11. Four (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six months of the date of approval. Code Provisions: 12. Per Section 18.65.070.13 "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R- O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." Page 7 I have enclosed a copy of the signed Finding of Fact and Order and the Planning Department's letter to the Department of Environmental Quality, for your records. I have also forwarded copies of the Waivers of Right to Protest the Creation of SID's, the document must be signed, notarized and returned to our office with the Final Plat application. Enclosed you will also find draft copies of the Subdivision Improvements Agreement. The Improvements Agreement will only be necessary if you choose to apply for Final Plat approval prior to completion of the infrastructure and common areas. The Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use Permit must also be signed, notarized and filed with the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder's Office, as soon as possible. Please forward a copy of the signed and notarized Conditional Use Permit document and return it with a copy of the receipt from recording. The original copies of the Waivers and Conditional Use Permit have been sent to the 3499 Bridger Canyon Road address since it is the official address on the application. Please note, I left the title area blank in the notary blocks for you to fill in since there was still some question in regards to your official titles. Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding the conditions, code provisions, or the Final Plat and Final Site Plan approval process. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner JM/jm cc: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1, Bozeman, MT 59718 Bayliss Ward, Bayliss Architects, PC, 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Page 8 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 13, 2001 MINUTES Recording Secretary, Jennifer Willems presented the DRB staff with an updated staff report and project information. The DRB reviewed the new material before the meeting started. ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Vice Chairperson, Jim Raznoff, called the meeting to order at 3:40 p.m. and directed the secretary to record the attendance. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Melvin Howe Henry Sorenson John Sherman, Associate Planner Jim Raznoff Bill Hanson Jami Morris,Assistant Planner Dawn Smith Joanne Mannell Noel Jennifer Willems, Recording Secretary Dan Glenn Dick Pohl ITEM 2. MINUTES OF JANUARY 9, 2001 Vice Chairperson called for corrections to the minutes of January 9, 2001. MOTION: Hearing none, Mr. Howe moved, Mr. Pohl seconded, to approve minutes as presented. The motion carried 4-0. ITEM 3. PROJECT REVIEW A._ Northern Rockies Professional Center,Zoning PUD -_#Z-00171 - (Morris) Ellis Street �k A Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plan Application to allow 7 commercial lots to be developed as an office complex. Bayliss Ward and Gary Lusin,joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Jami Morris presented the project plans and reviewed the staff report. Mr. Pohl suggested slopes in the parking lot seem to be steep. Mr. Ward stated there is only one area of the parking lot which would reach a 7% grade. He noted the parking lot will be terraced down. Assistant Planner Caroline stepped in for DRB Secretary, Jennifer Willems, and assumed taking minutes. Ms. Smith asked if the DBR would see site plans for each of the lots. Planner Morris noted the site plan review will be done in-house. Design Review Board Minutes-February 13,2001 1 A Ms. Smith expressed her concerns and suggested tabling the project until the next DRB meeting since the DRB received zoning packets but not subdivision packets. Mr. Glenn raised questions regarding surrounding developments. Planner Morris explained the adjacent Deaconess Annexation land and its phasing. Mr Glenn was concerned with the south edge of the property tying in with adjacent properties to the south. Planner Moms explained the surrounding zoning and why two different plans were presented. She explained the narrow median issue and fire concerns, noting fire concerns had been addressed. Mr. Ward stated the original concept plan were more green space for pedestrians, and better landscaping on each lot. He stated the curbs note actual lot lines, and anything within the curb is the lot owners responsibility to maintain, noting areas outside the curbs and common space is the associations responsibility. Mr. Ward explained the topography of the site and how it would allow for two-story buildings with walk out first floors. He noted the areas of terracing on the site plan, stating the grading plan is not final. Mr. Pohl asked about stormwater retention. Mr. Ward stated storm drains will conduct flows to the underground tank, noting half will flow one way and half the other. Mr. Pohl stated he would like to see a pedestrian friendly, open area surrounded only by cars. Mr. Glenn asked about the sliver of land between the proposed site and Highland Boulevard. Mr. Ward stated to his knowledge there is nothing planned and the City owns part along with individual property owners. Mr. Ward explained the history of Haggerty Lane, Ellis Street, and Highland Boulevard. Mr. Raznoff asked about Gallatin Valley Land Trust and trails. Mr. Ward showed where tentative trails could exist to the north and east of the property. Mr. Ward explained how the applicant will improve the gravel road to Comstock Street. Mr. Ward stated the parking exceeds the minimum standards because of medical uses and pointed out on the site plan where some drop off points are possible. Mr. Ward stated there will be no phasing. Mr. Ward stated there will be no phasing. Mr. Raznoff suggested the DRB members were not prepared to vote on the project and no action should be taken until further information is made available. Comments: Mr. Pohl would like see more usable pedestrian space and mentioned several species of plants that he would not recommend. Mr. Howe concurred with staff concerns and conditions,but felt a vote could be rendered. Design Review Board Minutes-February 13,2001 2 Ms. Smith stated the building guidelines were good and the landscaping will be "classier"than most around town, noting buildings will not appear massive because of the type of architecture. She proposed a day care as a possible business. Mr. Glenn expressed his main concerns and recommended different uses in the development like a small convenience store or coffee shop. Mr. Ward explained other uses like restaurants would require much more parking. Mr. Glenn stated he liked the relationship of the buildings and the fact they fronted on Ellis Street. Mr. Glenn noted he liked the idea of the parking and the buildings built higher than street level as not to be seen when driving on Ellis Street. Mr. Raznoff read conclusions of the staff report. He stated the open space issue is "O.K.". He noted the relationship of the buildings to the green space was not clearly shown. Mr. Ward-stated the layout of the buildings is not guaranteed as shown on the site plan. He asked the DRB members if they wanted to continue the project. MOTION: Mr. Howe motioned, Ms. Smith seconded, to forward recommendation of approval with conditions in staff report. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Glenn in position. Mr. Pohl and Mr. Glenn suggested adding a recommendation for increased open space. Mr. Raznoff suggested to include code provisions 13 & 14 as conditions to the project. MOTION: Mr. Pohl moved, Mr. Howe seconded, to amend the previous motion to include code provisions 13 & 14 as conditions and encouraged development of better people space in the common open space which could include some structure like a pavilion or a clock tower. The motion carried unanimously. ITEM 3. INFORMAL REVIEW A. Osco Drug Informal#I-0101- (Sherman) Southwest corner of Main Street and 19`h Avenue An Informal Review Application submitted for advice and comment for the demolition of an existing structure and the construction of a 16,784 sq. ft. commercial building. Todd Parker,joined the DRB. Planner Sherman reviewed the project and staff report. He explained after the demolition of the Ford dealership, MDT will be purchasing some right of way. Planner Sherman explained the access in and out from Main Street, noting MDT will have control of ingress/egress. He stated the parking is proposed with 70 spaces, noting only 50 are required. Planner Sherman stated some of the parking may need to be removed because of the right of way on Babcock Street. Design Review Board Minutes-February 13,2001 3 0 • d He stated the applicant would like more than the allowable extra 20% for signage. Planner Sherman stated more landscaping and a clear pedestrian route thru the parking.lot is needed. He suggested building closer to the street to break up the long facade. Discussion: Mr. Pohl had concerns regarding pedestrian circulation and access to Babcock Street. He stated the ingress from Main Street enters into the main entrance of the building and is not safe. ,Mr. Glenn stated the corner is very visible and prominent, saying a lot about Bozeman to visitors. He stated the building is like a strip store, a box building in a sense, noting the corners are the most prominent and say the most about your town. Ms. Smith stated it appears Osco has started with a cheap building design and site layout which is not typical of what we want for Bozeman.- Mr.Howe stated the applicant should have brought in the actual elevations,not the ones which were submitted, noting a glaring deficiency, and not good architecture. Mr. Raznoff stated the current flat roof design on the existing Osco leaks noting the site needs to incorporate roof lines which are not flat. He stated there should be more windows along the facade. Mr. Glenn suggested an ice cream counter(as in old time) to.break up the main facade. Planner Sherman suggested looking at North 7`h Avenue and Main Street's Rocky Mountain Roasters, for architectural design and corner buildings. DRB is willing to review the project in another Informal Review to consider changes before proceeding with a formal application. ITEM 4. ADJOURNMENT' MOTION: Mr. lenn moves, Mr. Raznoff seconded to adjourn. JTi�gn znoff, is airperson (De Review o d Design Review Board Minutes-February 13,2001 4 _ I �r 40� doe B02� CITY OF BOZEMAN -DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v 'Z - ' ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Cl `= - v e Phone: (406)582-2360 = =- = = 20 East Olive Street 83 o��e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 Fax: (406)582-2363 �q co• Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net August 24, 2001 Gary Lusin 3200 East Hollyhock Belgrade, MT 59714 Re: Northern Rockies PUD Dear Bayliss: On August 24, 2001, the Final Site Plan for the planned improvements for Northern Rockies Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development was approved and signed by the Director of Planning & Community Development based on the fulfillment of conditions and code provisions. Adherence to the conditions of approval and the outlined code provisions is mandatory. Enclosed you will find an approved site plan signed by the Planning Director. No modifications to the approved plans can be made without prior written approval from the Planning Office. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 582-2360. Thank you for your participation in the development review process, and good luck with your project! Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner Cc: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1, Bozeman, MT 59718 Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 Bayliss Ward, Bayliss Architects, 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 panning Zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination 41 goz CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v 9x Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2360 === === Z 20 East Olive Street 0 Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 Fax: (406)582-2363 co. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 E-mail: planning®bozeman.net World wide web: July 24, 2001 Bayliss Ward Bayliss Architects 212 South Tracy Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies PUD Dear Bayliss: Our Office has received a couple of calls regarding the lots to be created under the Northern Rockies PUD. The primary concern from our office is the amount of work yet to be completed (i.e., Final Plat and Final Site Plan approval) prior to site plan review for any of the lots. Therefore, I have created a timeline of events for your reference. You should also be aware that questions have been raised concerning the allotted parking for each lot. It would be to your advantage to outline in the Final Site Plan the number of parking spaces to be reserved for each lot on a proportionate basis with allowable building square footage determined by the use and number of available parking spaces. The Senior Planner is particularly concerned that unless some system is devised prior to the development application for each lot that by the time the final lot is reviewed there may be a deficit in parking. The parking issue should be addressed during the Final Site Plan review for the PUD but there is also the option that the Final Plat could eventually be amended minus one lot to account for additional parking needs. Please let me know if you would like to set up a meeting after August 6, 2001 when Senior Planner Skelton will be back in the office, then we can address some of these concerns. Otherwise, I hope the timeline will help identify the remaining steps before site plan review can commence. Sincerely, I Jami Mom 's Assistant Planner Cc: Gary Lusin, 3200 East Hollyhock, Belgrade, MT 59714 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1, Bozeman, MT 59718 Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation e housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination CONDITIONS.OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON ELLIS STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for a 7-lot medical office and professional office complex; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177C, SE1/4, SW1/4, Section 8, T2S, R6E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following thirteen (13) conditions and code provisions: 1. The subdivision shall.provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 2. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. i 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 4. The Architectural Guidelines.and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12.for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 1 OF 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 8. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the commencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid "Northern Rockies Zoning PUD .#Z-001.71 PAGE 2 OF 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of Planning Department approval. 11. Seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six months of the date of approval. Code Provisions: 12. Per Section 18.65.070.B "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted thirteen (13) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a restaurant. Northern Rockies Zoning Pub #Z-00171 PAGE 3 OF 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATED THIS DAY OF , 2001. PROPERTY OWNER By: John Campbell Campbell, LLC STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,2001, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared John Campbell, known to me to be the of Campbell, LLC, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set'my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) Notary Public for the State of Residing: Commission Expires: PROPERTY OWNER By: Gary Lusin Lusin, LLC i STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,2001, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Gary Lusin, known to me to be the of Lusin, LLC, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) Notary Public for the State of Residing: Commission Expires: Northerri Rockies Zoning,PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 4 OF 3 affidavit of VNblication . STATE OF MONTANA, SS County of Gallatin V iv i e P o r t ne l l , being duly sworn, deposes and says: That__she is Pr i nn i pnl Clark of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and that the notice here unto annexed ( Conditional Use Permit requested by C & H Engineering and Survey- RECEIVED By ing/Northern-Rockies Major Subdivision Prelimnary Plat ) has been APR 0 6 2001 correctly published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said paper for C17Y PLANNJJ\!_C 1 eonseea4ve- insert ion , the first of whic p blication was made on the 4th day of Mar Marhc 20 and the last on the 4 th day ofMarch/ 01 8tj19 0• Subscribed and sworn to before me this pTAR/i -Z- 4th day of April 20 01 Public for the State of Montana, <�OF Md� �� residing at Bozeman, Montana. Notary Pu:;iic jor the State of Montana Residing at Bozeman, Montana My Commission Expires June 27,2004 BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday,March 4,2001 • MILWAUKEE(AP)-Three `'fVs wonderful for cleaning up that mixes the biodiesel with re gular diesel. Board,a nonprofit industry group b Wisconsin Wisconsin high school students are help- black bus smoke.The exhaust smells The students already have produced in Jefferson City,Mo.•�rhis county ing clean up the environment with a pro- like french fries, said Jim Kraft,a chem- more than 100 gallons and developed a needs t0 be looking at alternative f., students create ject that might make drivers feel a sud- istry and physics teacher overseeing the 30-page business plan to market the sources." den craving for fast food. project at Green Bay East High School. product.Their mixture costs about$2.10 'Me students get a cleaned vegetal They are converting restaurant grease Michael Lindsley,16,Leah Erickson, a gallon,but students said the price likely mixture from Anamax Corp.,a render left over from cooking french fries and 17,and Brittanie Curds, mix restaurant will drop with increased demand. biodiesel rim g p companythatprocessesgreasefrom other fried foods into biodiesel-a grease with ethanol to produce the mix `Those kids are definitely on the right 15 000 Midwest restaurants,Kraft saic fast food oil cleaner-burning fuel mixture that can be ture,which a florist has been using to run track,"said Jenna Higgins,communica- They use motors to churn the mixtue used in regular diesel engines. his trucks for about two weeks.The florist tions director for the National Biodiesel an 80-gallon tub for about 45 minutes. NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A VARIANCE NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARINGS FOR A ZONE MAP AMI ENDMI NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing to be held before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public hearings to be held before the BOZEMAN ZONING COMMISS rrch 19,2001,at 7:00 p.m in the Commission Meeting Room,City Hall,411 East Main Street,Bozeman,Montana. Tuesday,April 3,2001,at 7:00 p.m and before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday,May 7,2001, e purpose of the public hearing is to consider an application for a variance to the existing Big 0 Tire Store. p.m.The meetings will be held in the Commission Meeting Room,City Hall,411 East Main,Bozeman,Montan, The purpose of the public hearingas pro is to consider an amendment to the City of Bozeman Zoning Map prop The application for a variance would allow the applicant James Miller&Associates,P.O. Box 3663, Littleton Springer Group Architects, P.C., 201 South Wallace, Bozeman, Montana 59715. The property 180161,represented by Springer Group Architects P.C.,201 South Wallace Avenue,Bozeman MT 59715,to Willowbrook Development, Ltd., clo Springer Group Architects P.C., 201 South Wallace, Boz man, M croach five feet into the required 8 foot side yard setback. The relocation of the curbing would allow for large 59715. The proposed amendment would establish an initial zoning designation on a 1.869 acre tract,ct eel-based vehicles to enter through the drive-thru bay for servicing. The subject property is legally described as located within the Gallatin County/Bozeman Area Zoning District,to"R-3a"(Residential Two Family, h 'tct 29 of the Northeast Annexation,location in the north 1/2 of Section 2,T1 S,R4E,PMM,City of Bozeman, Density District). The property is being concurrently reviewed for annexation to the City of Bozeman and is de illatin County, Montana. The property is owned by James Miller&Associates and is located at 620 North 7th as Parcel B,COS 2056,Gallatin County,Montana and is located on the eas Avenue with B-2 zoning designation(Community Business District). intersection of Wet Villard Street and Greenway Avenue. Public testimony will be taken the � aR Written and public testimony will be taken at the public hearing.Written comments 1 xs Y public ring.Written comments r submitted to a of 19 & Community Develc -__ may be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning & Community Development Department, Bo ;man Plan Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data a s Department, P. dz 2 fl Bo ;man, MT r71-1230. Maps and relate regarding this application may be reviewed in the Department of Planning & regarding this applicatir rrr reviewed i he Planning Department,2 17 t 20 East Olive Street 582-2360. For those Olive Stre 82-2360 For w ,req accommodations for disa Community Development Department, please conct. ry, Ci who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of ��_�� t B ,dman A Coordinator, 582-2305 d Bozeman ADA Coordinator,582-2305(voice),582-2301 (TDD). 582-2301 (TDD). #C-0101 -Big 0 Tire Store Variance #Z-010'17 West Villard Street Developmen NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing to be held before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday,March 19,2001,at NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing to be held before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Tuesday,March 1! i0 p.m in the Commission Meeting Room,City Hall,411 East Main Street,Bozeman,Montana. The purpose of the public hearing is to at 7:00 p.m in the Commission Meeting Room,City Hall,411 East Main Street,Bozeman,Montana. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Prelimin, isider a Preliminary Major Subdivision Plat application for Northern Rockies Subdivision Planned Unit Development. review of Northern Rockies Subdivision PUD, requested b Engineering Surveying,The application would allow Campbell/Lusin, LLC,3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman,Montana 59715, represented by C&H q y C&H En ineerin and Surve in 2415 West Main Street Bo. Montana 59718 representing CampbelVLusin,LLC,3499 Brid r Canyon Road,Bozeman,Montana 59715 pursuant to Sectior and 18.54 of the Bozeman ZoningOrdinance. Said Ilcation would establish a unified Ian for architectural an landscape plan. gineering and Surveying,2415 West Main Street,Bozeman,Montana 59718 to divide 7.7 acre withia shforthe Ifulure development aPP y P coned Unit Development. Said application would establish a unified plan for architectural and landscape PI P future development of a 7 lot Planned Unit Development as an office/medical office complex on approximately 7.7 acre: 9 medical office complex. The application would allow the relaxation of Chapter 16-16.080 Improvement Standards of the City of application would allow a relaxation of the following sections of the City of Bozeman.Zoning Ordinance: 1)to allow primary b izeman Subdivision Regulations to allow the construction,of a nonstandard private street and to allow Ellis Street,the secondary access, square footage to exceed the 60/o lot coverage permitted under Section 18.26.040;2)to allow a relaxation of the yard setba to remain unpaved east of the property line. The subject property is legally described as Tract C,COS each buildings as outlined in Section 1826.050;and 3)to allow pitched roofs to exceed 1177C,SE1/4,Section 8,T2S,R6E,City of Bozeman,Montana,and is located neat the southeast on buildings with a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater and 32 feet for building with flat roof I r comer of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street.The property is zoned"R-0"(Residential Office LT B-P �P less than 3:12 per Section 1826.060,on property located near the southeast comer of H B-P Boulevard and Ellis Street,which is legally described as Tract C,COS 1177C,SEi/4,SW 1/4, District)and owned by Campbeimony ,LLC. 8,T2S,R6E,City of Bozeman,Montana. The property is owned by Campbell/Lusin, LLC Oral and written public testimony will be taken at the public hearing.Written comments may „ zoned R-0 (Residential Office District). be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning&Community Development Department,P.O.Box R- 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this lication ma be R Oral and written public testimony will be taken at the public hearing.Written commen ap 9 9 app Y be directed to the City of Bozeman Planning&Community Development Department,Ri reviewed in the Planning Department,20 East Olive Street,582-2360. For those who require 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application n Subject Property accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey,City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, subject Property reviewed in the Planning Department,20 East Olive Street, 582-2360. For those who i 582-2305(voice),582-2301 (TDD). R-S accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey,City of Bozeman ADA Coorc R-s 582-2305 #P-0047 Northern Rockies Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat PUD (voice),582-2301 (TDD). #Z-00171 Northern Rockies Major Subdivision Preliminary Pla pNE �OC '� OF GALLATIN•VALLEY • �::. .. LIT SR, t•'� ..r.: �'��v'�.s',';"'�r`-`A a:'+°'.�'t��*tv� • 'f _4 'La """✓F.�. "�u ,�' WS NORTH ROUSE•BOZEMAN.MT-59715 Ir �, -- - - ,,,) • . ;I 7TJ7 i i U 7 years old % t \ \ S/F German Shepard b z` ff ! / 1 �� , �'Aussie mix -Photos by Anne Sherwood Years •1 1/2 Years Old Years Old . 12 15A, N/M Aussie Mix N/ 1-2 Years I NIM Black Lai) Bozeman • ---- - - - Daily r® 1C�� Friday, Saturday, Monday: g -5o30 GAR AGE D® I� 16 Your Paper Sunday: 1:004:00 It's Cold & Snowing!! Open your garage door automatically YX and stay warm. .E® Stabies E ® rl lnbFsbft Bank R/AYNOR Doors GUARANTEED 400 Van Dyke Lane 0 Bozeman We Put You - F i r s t�" for as long as you oven your home. tristable@aol.com Bozeman - 2800 W Main 586-4555 msu • strand union Bldg 586-0757 Gallatin center• N.19th&Burke 556-0158 Belgrade - Albertsons 388-0917 "BUILT TO RE WORRY FREE" Stables (406) 5874822 Member FDIC Equal Housing Lender 1� www.firstinterstatebank.com 80�11 - 582-1623 Sales • Installation • Service o® MARCH SPECIAL WANNA GET FRESH? INC. • Discount For Hill On all Cat adVAN DOOR TECH O adoption y �$® cat adoptionp on fees 1401 Gold Ave. Unit#D Humane Society fees for Market OPEN 24 HRS: Bozeman, MT 59715 Members $rs s!XtCounBozeman MT.912 N.7th email: doortech@montana.net Y Years and older Nunn r E BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, March 4, 2001 �720 Autos For Sale 720 Autos For Sale 720Autos1 0Autos For Sale 17201 Autos For Sale I- I Autos Far Sale 1 )YOTA AWD VAN 1991 LINCOLN TOWN CAR 1984 CAMARO.V-6.New Low Milest 95 Honda Accord ad,CD,dual air, Very good cond.,well maint., muffler;new all season tires, LX,emerald green,5 spd, 3T SEE!$3995 loaded with luxury.$4995 brand new flex plate, pwr/w/m/I,A/C,cruise,CD, IN FORD•222-2503 LIVINGSTON FORD•222-2503 transmission,and pump. 49k mi,$10,995 723-6402 $1600 FIRM•582 4459 - _-- 1 WOW .Inv o r4fi , IM09111 EnOIMT 011 Fo "Hobod Sells for LESS!• Mercury Cdrs y , N — i 2001 Ford F-150 Supercrevv 1994 Chevy 1-Ton'4x4 1"6 Ford Explorer XLT 1999 Dodge 1 2 Ton 4x4 extra OPl940,4x4,auto,Va,loaded SB 4 9P331a.eta V g /_ T006 spd,Vti,loaded,tool box 6,loaded,SEk 4x4 TII78p,Sspd,VS.loaded.SIT,dab cab e d 2000 Ford F-250 4x4 - 1999 Ford F-350 4x4 -� 1989 Chevy 3/4 Ton 1989 Chevy Suburban ! _ i- 1PUL Sspd,powerstroke,loaded OPK auto,VD,4x4 T17M,auto,4x4,V8 _ T1333p,auto,Power strok¢lariat "NA .. . � ,. .... ". tee..,a� _ _ __. - •� _ 1999 Ford Ranger 4x4 2000 Ford Explorer UT 1998 GMC Suburban 4x4 1"6 Mercury Villager OP1338,x[ab,auto,cd OP144B,auto,V6,loaded.4x4 OP161O,auto,VS,leather,loaded,3/4 ton ._ 6 s OP198,a Passenger,loaded - Model#RD1871ENW-Includes splash guards ti The new CRV Special Edition has those_mglior e features that make a 4-wheel drive 1G CR V so versatile,along with several appetizing items.The exterior has been enhanced — f y • TOi F oat¢-1 loaded OP7 0 auto,Ford loaded.- •rr with body-colored bumpers and side moldings,a hard spae-are cover and a chrome 1991 Ford F-150 4x4 2000 Ford lover UT z P 1996 Chevy 5-10 Blazer 1999 Ford Mustang Conv grille accent.Inside,you'll find a 3-in-1 AM/FM stereo cass;tte with in-dash CD player, 4.4.security urns,auto,loaded to 4xa OP9ae,Stp4 35th Onatvenary,loather ed seats and a leather rear privacy glass,a standard automatic transmission,leathtr-trimmed steering-wheel cover.For a test-drive,come see us.Just a for a CRN with the works. '.: CR V S ecial Edition : a D a' 2000 Mercury Sable 1998 Ford 2X2 1999 Plymouth Breeze 1996 Toyota Corolla DX 11 IIVIK auto,V6,loaded OP1478,Sspd,arnfln asrbags OP169C auto,loaded,aIrba fll 9s OP18111,auto,am/hn cuss,air bags Q HONDA ` SALE $225500 for 337/mo', $0 Down; No Security Deposit Lease $ .. 1999 Pontiac Grand Am SE 1997 Chrysler Concorde LX 1998 Pontiac Grand Am 19"Ford Taurus SE OP1700,auto,V6,loaded,cd OP1700,auto,V6,loaded OPIUA,Sspd,V6,powvrlodn 9P177p,auto,V6,loaded `mr �,Qni nth 1800 West Main $pot Bozeman 587-122 I A N' F � inancin I-800-745-FORDH 0 r Pete Greg Steve John Les Roger McFarlane Linton Zabawa Satterwhite Rate Mortenson Huffine Lane 4 Miles West of �To681god• bozemanford@in-tch.com Bozeman's Gallatin Valley Mall Foura•rmr• a"'�"""' 1 ► 1 1 Email: simpsonhonda@in-tch..com F 587-0761 • 1-800-246-07 Hours: Mon-Fri 8-6:00 • Sat 9-5 N = ' *48 mo., 12,000 miles per year,residual$12,604.first pay,,t due at signing O.A,C: 1, Autos For Sale 1 1 1 Autos For Sale 1 Autos For Sale 1 Autos For Sale 1 Autos For Sale �720 Autos For Sale 1720 Autos Far Sale o � for your tradin � \s i � ' GOOD _ CREDIT, NO CREDIT, SAD CREDIT IT car, truck, v DOESN'T MATTER. WE CAN FIX YOUUP! or SUV in stk! We Anwed your older trade-Ins 7 7 dbk; oftM'W& t mehmhA; � 7oa 7� r✓ j" Five Star One mile west of �llatin Valley Mall www billiondeal.com 1m800=497=7253 1 l 1 ` B02� CITY O DZEMAN o� , �4 DEPAR'119K.NT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITAVELOPMENT V 9� * * Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building `_ Ze 20 East Olive Street Phone: (406)582-2360 << 1 83 �e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406)582-2363 tr'Ar CO.Mo? Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozen=.net Memorandum To: City Commissioners From: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner Date: March 19, 2001 Subject: Northern Rockies Major Site Preliminary Plan PUD #Z-00171 Comments: While cutting and pasting the staff report for City Commission, the following zoning PUD criteria were inadvertently deleted: All Development: 3. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? The project will be replacing the existing grassland vegetation with an automatic irrigation system maintaining landscaped yards and open space containing sod, trees and shrubs. 4. Have special precautions been talcen to preserve existing wildlife habitats, natural wildlife food services, or existing places, or are these areas being preserved? There are currently no trees on the site so the majority of the wildlife in the area are the birds and rodents most often found in grassland areas bordering cultivated landscapes. Montana Fish, Wildlife &Parks has identified the potential for negative impacts to a small spring to the east of the property. The developer's Engineer has determined that these negative impacts can be minimized with storm water detention ponds and the landscape buffering. The applicant will obtain a storm water discharge permit as well as provide evidence of an erosion control plan. 5. If the proposed project is located within a locally designated historical district or includes a locally designated landmark structure, is the project in conformance with the city's Historic Preservation Ordinance? The Montana Historical Society noted three cultural properties within T2S, R6E, Section 8. Due to the lack of a cultural resource inventory on this site and the presence of cultural resources in the area, a condition for approval has been required to ensure that the proper studies are initiated prior to site prep and/or infrastructure installation. I 9. Is the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography, natural water bodies and water courses, existing vegetation; and 10. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan I (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement: transportation networks, selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources, etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? According to the site plan submitted, the buildings and parking will be incorporated into the existing site topography and will utilize the existing slope to provide a terracing of the development. As stated previously, negative impacts to the spring to the east of the property will be mitigated through the use of detention ponds and landscape buffering. 11. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? The building entrances and landscaped courtyards are situated and designed to provide maximum privacy by facing into the development rather than towards Ellis Street, Highland Boulevard and even I-90. The open space has been provided in the required 25' front yard setback and provides a connection to the adjoining Softball Complex. 15. Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? There are no adjacent developments to integrate the development and circulation patterns. The 420 acres to the south of this property are residentially zoned and will likely determine the dominant circulation patterns upon development. 17. Does the pedestrian and bicycle trail system adequately connect to the systems in adjacent developments? The developer will be required to install sidewalk across the subject property and further west to Highland Boulevard. Although there is currently no sidewalk on the east side of Highland Boulevard, there is an existing bike/pedestrian path on the west side. 20. If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the site plan to avoid interfering with public access to that area? The Softball Complex is adjacent to the property to the northwest. Based on the site plan it is hard to determine whether the driveway access to the Softball Complex and the (minor) drive access to the subdivision will be directly adjacent. Residential: 1. On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project (calculated for residential portion of the site only), consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the Bozeman Master.Plan? Page 2 The site will provide one professional building per acre. The allowable density for R-O zoning is fifteen units per acre. 2. Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g., private yards, patios and balconies, etc.)for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light sun, ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Aside from the open space provided at the front of the subdivision, the developer has demonstrated the potential for courtyards within the complex and to be incorporated into the building on a lot. 3. Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? The open space provided within the development has been designed to provide a seating area for the employees and patrons to relax and enjoy the outdoors. The Design Review Board . recommend the condition that the subdivision provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. 4. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? Not applicable. 6. Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? As stated within the "All Development" section of the PUD criteria, the development will be constructed so as to utilize the existing topography and to minimize any adverse effects to the natural environment. 7. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus (thirty percent maximum) above that which is set forth below, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards (such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development? Not applicable. 9. If limited commercial development as defined above is proposed within the project, is less than twenty percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? Page 3 i I The developer has not requested a relaxation of the permitted uses in the R-O zoning district associated with this Planned Unit Development (Conditional Use Permit) application. The developer proposes medical offices and professional offices which are principal uses in the R-O zoning district. 10. If neighborhood service activities are proposed within the project, is a market analysis provided demonstrating that less than fifty percent of the market required to support proposed neighborhood service activities is located outside the immediate area of the PUD and are the neighborhood services Of a nature that does not require drive-in facilities or justification for through traffic? Not applicable. 13. Does the overall PUD recognize and, to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? The PUD will be characteristic of the existing neighborhood which currently includes the hospital, the professional center connected to the hospital, the retirement community and residential areas including Comstock Apartments and New Hyalite Subdivision which will benefit from the services provided. Qua Addition of the Standard CUP Conditions for Approval 09411 were not noted in the staff report). The total conditions should read as follows: 5 4 Northern Rockies Major Site Plan PUD #Z-00171 ,Planning Department/Design Review Board: �J The subdivision shall provide "people spaces" within the_designa__common open space U with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavi_ 1�on,These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. (2.1On1y one low-profile sigayer ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. D3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of ts that conten identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a Page 4 I polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. The roof pitch of any building within the_L'UD_shalLmainta n.a_roof_pitch no less than.6:1.21 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory.b_uildings_or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. Standard Conditions for Approval: 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 8. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the commencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of Planning Department approval. 11. Four (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six months of the date of approval. Code Provisions: 12. Per Section 18.65.070.13 "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and Page 5 shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." Page 6 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 CITY OF BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION #Z-00171. A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH A UNIFIED PLAN FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF A 7 LOT OFFICE COMPLEX ON ELLIS STREET AND ZONED "R-O" (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE). APPLICANT: CAMPBELL/LUSIN, LLC, 3499 BRIDGER CANYON ROAD, BOZEMAN, MT 59715 REPRESENTATIVE: C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, 2415 WEST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: CITY COMMISSION: MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2001, 7:00 P.M. IN THE COMMISSION ROOM OF CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS, ASSISTANT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION The subject property is located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street and is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177C, SE'/4 , SW'/4 , Section 8, T2S, R6E, City of Bozeman. The property is zoned "R-O" (Residential Office). Please refer to the vicinity map. Adjacent properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: "B-P" - (across Ellis Street) City of Bozeman Softball Complex, Life of Montana SOUTH: "R-S" - vacant Deaconess property EAST: "R-O" - vacant Life of Montana property, Comstock Apartments WEST: "R-2" - vacant Deaconess property a Bozeman City Commission Staff Report 1 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 PLI B-P Pam' l4� R- Subject Property. R-S -2 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Based upon the following analysis, Planning Staff, Design Review Board (DRB) and the Development Review Committee (DRC) find that the application is in general compliance with the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and Bozeman Area Master Plan Update. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Zoning Application #Z-00171, contingent upon compliance with the site specific conditions (1-5) listed below and the standard conditions for approval (1-5) listed on'page 6 of the staff report: Planning Staff/Design Review Board: 1. The subdivision shall provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. j 2. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. i 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 4. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. Bozeman City Commission Staff Report 2 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. PROPOSAL AND BACKGROUND Application has been made for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary_Plan on Rroperty located on Ellis Street. The property is zoned "R-O" (Residential Office). The subject property,currently vacant. The development proposal is for the construction of a coordinated 7 lot medical office complex and is undergoing concurrent subdivision review. 4o e,Cco c�ctncfete.Q l o� The proposed�developmen would provide a grass boulevard, a new sidewalk, street frontage trees in addition to the required yard landscaping and improvements along Ellis Street to the eastern property line. The site will provide three driveway accesses to the subdivision, two of which will be maintained as the subdivision's private street. The proposed signage for the development exceeds the standards outlined in the zoning ordinance. Additional language will be required in the covenants that will minimize the actual amount of signage permitted in order to conform to the City of Bozeman requirements. Only one low profile sign will be permitted at each entrance to the subdivision and they will maintain a five foot setback from the right-of-way line. The square footage and total amount of signage allowable has been outlined by staff and identified as code provisions. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Section 18.54 Planned Unit Development In approving a Planned Unit Development, the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outhried in Section 18.54.100 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. Planning staff has evaluated the application against the applicable Planned Unit Development review criteria and offers the following summary review comments below. All Development 1. Is the development compatible with, and sensitive to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods relative to architectural design, building bulk and height, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integrity? Other than the softball complex, the adjacent properties are all vacant. Some of the larger buildings in the vicinity include: Life of Montana, Deaconess Hospital and Comstock Apartments. Most of these two story buildings have expansive flat roofs. The maximum building height in the R-O district is 38 feet for buildings with a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater. With the hospital in close proximity, the neighborhood provides a hub for medical care. The proposed project will provide additional health care services with a majority of the building space being devoted to medical office space. Additional landscaping will need to be provided on the south side of the development to provide a buffer between the campus setting proposed and any future residential growth. The PUD ensures that by relaxing the City's zoning standards that the developer will provide excellence in design which includes,but is not limited to,building and Bozeman City Commission Staff Report 3 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 landscaping. Since every development within the PUD will undergo review, the visual integrity of the area should not be compromised. 2. Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, sanitary supply,fire protection,flood hazard areas, telephone, cable television, trails/walks/bike ways, irrigation companies, electricity, natural gas, storm drainage, streets? The development does comply with city standards. For instance, the water and sewer will be extended from Haggerty Lane to the site, the entire site lies outside of the 500 year flood plain and adequate facilities exist to provide utilities to the site. In addition, a sidewalk will be installed to run east to west along the property line and with continued development of Ellis Street, the trail system will eventually connect Highland Boulevard and Haggerty Lane. 3. Is the exterior lighting, except for warning, emergency or traffic signals, installed in such a manner that the light source is obscured to prevent excessive glare on public streets and walkways or into any residential area? One of the conditions of approval addresses the need for a light plan for the development. In the plan the developer will be required to identify street lighting along Ellis Street,parking lot lights and wall mounted lights that are in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance. 4. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) arranged on the site so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community and neighborhood? The site will provide a functional plan for ingress and egress. The private road depicted on the site plan passes through the center of the subdivision with buildings and open space on each side. The design allows for maximum density and efficient use of the property while maintaining the.required amount of open space for the public. The site plan reserves open space for a common area as well as open space within the lots to allow courtyards to be incorporated.into the building plans. S. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient,functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development? The site plan and the Architectural Guidelines demonstrate a connection between buildings for pedestrian circulation through the use of pedestrian walkways and a functional path of travel along Ellis Street integrated with the landscaping. 6. Open space The site plan fulfills the 30% open space requirement with the landscaped with landscaped front yard setbacks, interior courtyards and two sites that will provide picnic tables, landscaping and other outdoor design elements. Bozeman City Commission Staff Report 4 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 7. Is the active recreational area suitably located and accessible to the residential units is intended to serve and is adequate screening provided to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring residential uses? The common areas are centrally located for the benefit of each lot within the subdivision and adequate screening will be provided on the south side of the property in order to comply with the conditions for approval. 8. Is the pedestrian circulation system designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area? The site plan indicates crosswalks between each lot and within the parking lots that will specify areas for pedestrian circulation. 9. Does the pedestrian circulation system incorporate design features to enhance convenience, safety and amenity across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to,paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting? The pedestrian circulation system within the parking areas will be distinguished by the change in materials as indicated by the crosshatch pattern on the plan. 10. Does the landscape plan enhance the appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian areas which contribute to their usage and visual appearance? The landscaping along Ellis Street and within the development will enhance the appearance of the site which is currently void of trees. 11. Does the landscaping plan enhance the building(s)? The perimeter of each building will be landscaped. Each plan will be reviewed by the Planning Department prior to development to ensure a unified landscaping plan. Residential 1. Is the project within two thousand feet of an existing or approved neighborhood service center,public school, day care center, major employment center, or public neighborhood or community park? i The project is within 800 feet of Deaconess Hospital which is a major employment center and the softball complex is across Ellis Street to the northwest of the property. 2. If the project contains limited commercial developments as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets? The project is due east of the Highland Boulevard/Ellis Street intersection and will be serviced by Highland Boulevard which is a minor arterial, Haggerty Lane (will not be paved completely) which is a collector street and Ellis Street which is a local street. Bozeman City Commission Staff Report 5 i Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 3. If the project contains limited commercial development as defined above, has the project been sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood and have the commercial activities been developed at a scale compatible with residential development? The nearest existing residential developments are at either end of Highland Boulevard and are not immediately adjacent to this property. Developing the property for medical offices and general office space with the potential for daycare facilities is consistent with the Life of Montana and Deaconess Hospital developments. STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: 1. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 2. Any phasing,proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 3. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. Code Provisions: 4. Per Section 18.65.070.B 'Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total•signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/6r projecting signs. 5. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south,per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." Attachments: Exhibit A- Applicant's Submittal including Architectural Guidelines Exhibit B - Letter from adjoining property owner cc: Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 Gary Lusin, 3200 East Hollyhock, Belgrade, MT 59714 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 2415 West Main Street, Bozeman, MT 59718 Bayliss Architects, 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman City Commission Staff Report 6 • Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION#Z- 00171. A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH A UNIFIED PLAN FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF A 7 LOT OFFICE COMPLEX ON ELLIS STREET AND ZONED "R-O" (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE). APPLICANT: CAMPBELL/LUSIN, LLC, 3499 BRIDGER CANYON ROAD, BOZEMAN, MT 59715 REPRESENTATIVE: C&H ENGINEERING V G G AND SURVEYING, 2415 WEST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 330 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET, BOZEMAN, MT. REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS, ASSISTANT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PROJECT LOCATION The subject property is located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street and is legally described as Tract C, COS PLI B-P Pt 1177C, SE'/4 , SW'/4 , Section 8, T2S, R6E, City of lq� Bozeman. The property is zoned "R-O" (Residential P Office). Please refer to the vicinity map. Adjacent properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: "B-P" - (across Ellis Street) City of R- Bozeman Softball Complex, Life of Montana SOUTH: "R-S" - vacant Deaconess property EAST: "R-O" - vacant Life of Montana Subject Property property, Comstock R-S Apartments -2 WEST: "R-2" - vacant Deaconess property Design Review Board Staff Report 1 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 r PROPOSAL AND BACKGROUND Application has been made for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan on property located on Ellis Street. The property is zoned "R-O" (Residential Office). The subject property is currently vacant. The development proposal is for the construction of a coordinated 7 lot medical office complex and is undergoing concurrent subdivision review. The proposed development would provide a grass boulevard, a new sidewalk, street frontage trees in addition to the required yard landscaping and improvements along Ellis Street to the eastern property line. The site will provide three driveway accesses to the subdivision, two of which will be maintained as the subdivision's private street. The proposed signage for the development exceeds the standards outlined in the zoning ordinance. Additional language will be required in the covenants that will minimize the actual amount of signage permitted in order to conform to the City of Bozeman requirements. Only one low profile sign will be permitted at each entrance to the subdivision and they will maintain a five foot setback from the right-of-way line. The square footage and total amount of signage allowable has been outlined by staff and identified as code provisions. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development concept (PUD), to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Per Bozeman Zoning Ordinance Section 18.54 the Design Review Board (DRB) is established to evaluate aesthetic considerations of larger and more complex proposals which are likely to produce significant community impact, including Conditional Use Permits located within overlay districts, and is empowered to recommend approval, conditional approval or denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness to the City Commission for such Conditional Use Permit applications. The following list identifies the issues that relate to the Planned Unit Development design and have been identified by Staff as conditions for approval: -Z).1. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. 2. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 3. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 4. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, The location and size shall be ' approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman(Dept.)prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. Design Review Board Staff Report 2 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 5. Any phasing,proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 6. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 7. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings. Code Provisions: —)- 13. Per Section 18.65.070.B 'Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. .�14. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA A. Section 18.54 Planned Unit Development In approving a Planned Unit Development, the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outlined in Section 18.54.100 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. Planning staff has evaluated the application against the applicable Planned Unit Development review criteria and offers the following summary review comments below. All Development 1. Is the development compatible with, and sensitive to, the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods relative to architectural design, building bulk and height, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integrity? Other than the softball complex, the adjacent properties are all vacant. Some of the larger buildings in the vicinity include: Life of Montana, Deaconess Hospital and Comstock Apartments. Most of these two story buildings have expansive flat roofs. The maximum building height in the R-O district is 38 feet for buildings with a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater. With the hospital in close proximity, the neighborhood provides a hub for medical care. The proposed project will provide additional health care services with a majority of the building space being devoted to medical office space. Additional landscaping will need to be provided on the south side of the development to provide a buffer between the campus setting proposed and any future residential growth. The PUD ensures that by relaxing the City's zoning standards that the developer will provide excellence in design which includes, but is not limited to,building and Design Review Board Staff Report 3 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 landscaping. Since every development within the PUD will undergo review, the visual integrity of the area should not be compromised. 2. Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, sanitary supply,fire protection,flood hazard areas, telephone, cable television, trails/walks/bike ways, irrigation companies, electricity, natural gas, storm drainage, streets? The development does comply with city standards. For instance, the water and sewer will be extended from Haggerty Lane to the site, the entire site lies outside of the 500 year flood plain and adequate facilities exist to provide utilities to the site. In addition, a sidewalk will be installed to run east to west along the property line and with continued development of Ellis Street, the trail system will eventually connect Highland Boulevard and Haggerty Lane. 3. Is the exterior lighting, except for warning, emergency or traffic signals, installed in such a manner that the light source is obscured to prevent excessive glare on public streets and walkways or into any residential area? One of the conditions of approval addresses the need for a light plan for the development. In the plan the developer will be required to identify street lighting along Ellis Street, parking lot lights and wall mounted lights that are in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance. 4. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) arranged on the site so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community and neighborhood? The site will provide a functional plan for ingress and egress. The private road depicted on the site plan passes through the center of the subdivision with buildings and open space on each side. The design allows for maximum density and efficient use of the property while maintaining the required amount of open space for the public. The site plan reserves open space for a common area as well as open space within the lots to allow courtyards to be incorporated into the building plans. 5. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc) designed and arranged to produce an efficient,functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development? The site plan and the Architectural Guidelines demonstrate a connection between buildings for pedestrian circulation through the use of pedestrian walkways and a functional path of travel along Ellis Street integrated with the landscaping. 6. Open space The site plan fulfills the 30% open space requirement with the landscaped with landscaped front yard setbacks, interior courtyards and two sites that will provide picnic tables, landscaping and other outdoor design elements. Design Review Board Staff Report 4 INTorthern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 7. Is the active recreational area suitably located and accessible to the residential units is intended to serve and is adequate screening provided to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring residential uses? The common areas are centrally located for the benefit of each lot within the subdivision and adequate screening will be provided on the south side of the property in order to comply with the conditions for approval. 8. Is the pedestrian circulation system designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area? The site plan indicates crosswalks between each lot and within the parking lots that will specify areas for pedestrian circulation. .9. Does the pedestrian circulation system incorporate design features to enhance convenience, safety and amenity across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to,paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting? The pedestrian circulation system within the parking areas will be distinguished by the change in materials as indicated by the crosshatch pattern on the plan. 10.. Does the landscape plan enhance the appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian areas which contribute to their usage and visual appearance? The landscaping along Ellis Street and within the development will enhance the appearance of the site which is currently void of trees. 11. Does the landscaping plan enhance the building(s)? The perimeter of each building will be landscaped. Each plan will be reviewed by the Planning Department prior to development to ensure a unified landscaping plan. Residential 1. Is the project within two thousand feet of an existing or approved neighborhood service center,public school, day care center, major employment center, or public neighborhood or community park? The project is within 800 feet of Deaconess Hospital which is a major employment center and the softball complex is across Ellis Street to the northwest of the property. 2. If the project contains limited commercial developments as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets? The project is due east of the Highland Boulevard/Ellis Street intersection and will be serviced by Highland Boulevard which is a minor arterial, Haggerty Lane (will not be paved completely) which is a collector street and Ellis Street which is a local street. Design Review Board Staff Report 5 Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 3. If the project contains limited commercial development as defined above, has the project been sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood and have the commercial activities been developed at a scale compatible with residential development? The nearest existing residential developments are at either end of Highland Boulevard and are not immediately adjacent to this property. Developing the property for medical offices and general office space with the potential for daycare facilities is consistent with the Life of Montana and Deaconess Hospital developments. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION During the Concept Plan PUD review (the project was originally named Highland Medical Center) the Design Review Board reviewed this project and offered the following comments: 1) there should be a focal point to the development which could be provided through the design of the open space; 2) there should be a common theme for the building layout, perhaps group the buildings in order to produce a focal point; and 3) the project needed concentrated internal green space and the board recommended providing two common areas. The Board should consider whether the preliminary plan has fulfilled the previous recommendations and that the objectives of the Planned Unit Development, as they relate to design, have been achieved. The Final Site Plan review of each lot will be the responsibility of the Administrative Design Review staff. Therefore, if the Board has any concerns they should be addressed prior to the City Commission hearing. The recommendations of Design Review Board and the Development Review Committee will be forwarded to the City Commission for its consideration and final action at a public hearing held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, March 19, 2001. Attachments: Exhibit A- Applicant's Submittal including Architectural Guidelines Exhibit B - Letter from adjoining property owner cc: Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 Gary Lusin, 3200 East Hollyhock, Belgrade, MT 59714 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 2415 West Main Street, Bozeman, MT 59718 Bayliss Architects, 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Design Review Board Staff Report 6 • • CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2001 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE President Ed Musser called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Discussion followed on legislation that affects the Board. The President directed the secretary to take the roll. Members Present Staff Present Ed Musser Jeff Monroe,Assistant Planner Rich Noonan Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Nikki Naiser Andrew C. Epple, Director, Planning and Community Eric Lindeen Development Brian Gallik Carol Schott, Recording Secretary Mark Haggerty Ben Alexander Joe Frost Visitors Present Per Hjalmarsson Bayliss Ward ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT (0-15 MINUTES) President Musser OPENED THE MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, and hearing none, CLOSED THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. ITEM 3. MINUTES OF JANUARY 17, 2001 President Musser called for corrections or additions to the minutes of January 17, 2001. Hearing none, Mr. Lindeen moved,Mr. Frost seconded, to approve the minutes as presented. ITEM 4. This Item Reserved for County Planning Board Presentation (as needed) ITEM 5. PROJECT REVIEW A. * Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application #P-0102 (Sperry). An informal meeting on a Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application, requested by Richard Smith, for Ray Sperry, to subdivide 0.48 acres into 2 residential lots. The property is described as Lot 50, Bridger Creek Subdivision, City of Bozeman,Montana. The property is located at 2411 Par Court. (Monroe) City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 1 Assistant Planner Jeff Monroe presented the Staff Report. Mr. Alexander asked if the subdivision was initially intended to be split into two lots. Senior Planner Dave Skelton noted, though the subdivision was intended to be 4-plexes, the residents to the north are in favor of the proposed SFR=s, and the construction of SFR=s is market driven also. Mr. Noonan asked if there are CC&R=s that would limit this action. Planner Skelton noted the Home Owners' Association is aware of this proposed subdivision and are in favor of it. In response to Mr. Lindeen's question on major traffic routes, Planner Monroe noted they would be Story Mill Road and Bridger Creek Drive. Discussion followed on how many other lots could be divided. Planner Monroe noted all of the lots that are 2 acre or more in size and could be split. Planner Skelton noted the splitting allows the change from 4-plexes to duplexes. Discussion followed on what defines an apartment.,with Planner Skelton noting that 5 plexes or more are generally considered commercial/apartments. President Musser OPENED THE MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, and hearing none, CLOSED THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. Mr. Alexander moved, Ms. Naiser seconded, to recommend approval of application #P-0102 as presented by Staff. The motion carried 8-0. B. * Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application #P-0103 (Hulme). An informal meeting on a Minor Subdivision Preliminary Plat application, requested by Richard Smith, for John Hulme, to subdivide 0.05 acres into 2 residential lots. The property is described as Lot 51, Bridger Creek Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is located at 2417 Par Court. (Monroe) Assistant Planner Jeff Monroe presented the Staff Report. In response to Mr. Alexander, Senior Planner Dave Skelton noted the market is demanding SFR=s. Mr. Lindeen clarified there is a mix of SFR and duplexes in this neighborhood. In response to Ms. Naiser, Planner Monroe noted there are approximately three other lots that could be split. Mr. Noonan noted that in most cases, the proposed splits provide two additional lots for Homeowners dues. President Musser OPENED THE MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, and hearing none, CLOSED THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. Mr. Gallik moved, Ms. Naiser seconded, to recommend approval of application #P- 0103. The motion carried 8-0. C. * Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application #P-0047 (Northern Rockies). A Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat application, requested by C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., for John Campbell and Gary Lusin, to subdivide 7.7 acres into a 7 lot Planned Unit Development. The property is described as Tract C, C.O.S. City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 2 1177C, SE3 , SW3 of Section 8, T2S, R6E, City of Bozeman,Montana. The property is located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street. (Morris/Skelton) Senior Planner Dave Skelton presented the Staff Report, reviewed the relaxation of the subdivision regulations requested in the PUD application, and reviewed those questions that have been received from the general public. He noted one letter has been received in opposition to the application. He reviewed conditions #1, #2,#4, #5,#12. He noted the development of each individual lot will be reviewed by the D.R.C. prior the issuance of a building permit. Mr. Lindeen asked if Ellis Street to Highland Boulevard will be completed. Planner Skelton noted that with this proposal a portion would not be paved, in time, it will with further development of the property to the east. Mr. Frost asked if Rocky Creek to the east is being addressed. Per Hjalmarsson noted the east portion of the storm drainage channel is primarily for.storm water runoff from the south and ultimately drains into Rocky Creek further downstream. Discussion continued on the drainages around the property, with Mr. Hjalmarsson explaining the drainage from the property. President Musser asked if a larger structure than normally is one of the requested relaxations of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Planner Skelton noted the request is to reduce the required yard setbacks within the interior of the development, but the project will maintain the prescribed yard setbacks around the perimeter of the project. He noted that in a PUD the yard setbacks can be incorporated into satisfying the required open space provisions. Mr. Alexander asked if the Board is to consider the traffic impacts. Mr. Hjalmarsson noted Highland Boulevard will be widened to provide a turn lane for Ellis Street. He noted the City is not willing to participate in the installation of a 10 inch water main, to which Planner Skelton responded the oversizing is not included on the CIP list, therefore, the City is not at this time planning to participate in any oversizing. Following discussion on street standards, Mr. Hjalmarsson noted they will be designing the street and installing water and sewer mains, with the east end of the street covered with gravel. Planner Skelton suggested the applicant explore the draft street standards in the Transportation Plan Update to confirm whether they are in concert with the anticipated new street standards. Planner Chris Saunders noted Montana Department of Transportation just issued new requirements for streets and may offer alternatives. Mr. Noonan asked if the Board can comment on snow storage and drainage areas, to which Planner Skelton noted they can. Mr. Noonan wondered if there is adequate snow storage for the 7.5 acres, to which Planner Skelton stated he would defer to Engineering Staff, but noted it appears to be lacking adequate for storage areas. City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 3 • • Bayliss Ward, architect, noted the snow storage will be pushed to the perimeters and the rest hauled away. He noted there is no median indicated as DRC determined it shouldn't be installed due to utility issues. He noted detention and retention are being done with underground storage tanks. Mr. Frost asked if the sidewalks in the interior have been removed. Mr. Ward noted the sidewalks are still there, but not the trees. Planner Skelton explained the City standards required for emergency vehicles and adequate utility easements to access the infrastructure. He noted that Fire Code couldn't be changed with a variance to the subdivision regulations and/or zoning ordinance. He suggested that the Board give definite direction on the need for interior sidewalks to the City Commission in their motion. Mr. Frost stated a utility easement is required to be 30' with the utility in the center, then asked why the staff report stated the utility has to be no less than 10' from the edge of the easement. Planner Skelton explained that the sewer is installed in the middle of an easement with the water installed 10' on either side of the sewer main. Discussion followed on the dictates of open space, parking, and structure size. Mr. Haggerty noted the open space strips along the streets were rather useless. Mr. Ward noted there is a lot of undulation and elevation drop on this property, which is difficult to show on a flat paper. In response to the Board, Planner Skelton noted the intent and purpose for on- street parking is to provide for overflow parking. Mr. Haggerty noted he feels the City is always preparing for the extreme event,which doesn't happen but once or twice a year. Planner Skelton stated the Municipal Code requires parking calculations to be based on potentially the most intense use under the zoning in place, keeping in mind that the lack of adequate parking is a key problem with any development proposal and the parking requirements are a minimum standard required by the Ordinance. Mr. Hjalmarsson explained the traffic study and the required improvements indicated by it. Discussion followed on the number of accesses onto Ellis Street. It was determined the three proposed accesses were appropriate. President Musser OPENED THE,MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, hearing none, CLOSED THE PUBLIC COMMENT portion of the meeting. Mr. Alexander noted the open space design is poorly done and he deemed the green strips along the streetlas useless. He suggested creating larger open spaces by placing the structures closer'lo the streets. Mr. Frost stated the street widths will be reviewed by City Commission to determine if the requirements are unnecessary. Mr. Haggerty suggested exploring the possibility of moving some of the interior parking to the street. He suggested the open space requirements be reduced and encouraged more structures. Planner Skelton noted this project is just one element of the community's fabric, but it plays an integral role in piece of the pie. He noted the quality of life of a City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 4 community is often determined by what importance it places on open space, parkland and its streetscapes. He noted it plays an integral role in the urban language of the community and serves as a key linkage between neighborhoods with a community, both residential and commercial. Mr. Haggerty suggested a more urban streetscape with the structures located nearer to the streets. Mr. Noonan suggested a separate motion be made to suggest that the Commission investigate various issues, such as, street widths, open space, and/or other issues. MOTION: Mr. Frost moved, Mr. Noonan seconded, to recommend approval of application #P-0047 as conditioned by Staff, with a recommendation that City Commission investigate condition #27,which refers to turning lanes. The motion carried 7-1,with Mr. Haggerty voting in opposition. Mr. Noonan moved, Ms. Naiser seconded, to recommend that the City Commission look at the fire codes to see if street standards can be relaxed, utility easements be reduced, parking requirements be reduced, and issues and concerns the Board brought up at this meeting, such as open space reduction. Mr. Alexander amended the motion, Mr. Lindeen seconded, to not only reduce the requirements but make them compliant with TND requirements. The amendment to the motion carried 8-0 and the motion carried 8-0. A short recess was taken and the meeting was reconvened. ITEM 6. BOZEMAN 2020 Process and Progress of the Bozeman 2020 Master Plan 1. Review Plan chapters (all but Public Services & Facilities; and Implementation Associate Planner Jody Olsen led the discussion on all Chapters except Chapter 11, which is Public Facilities and Infrastructure, and the chapter on implementation. She suggested meeting next Tuesday, February 27th at 7:00 p.m., to discuss the two remaining chapters. She discussed how the goals and objectives will relate to the implementation policies. Mr. Alexander suggested the policies need to be within the text to help the visualization. He suggested two volumes may be required. Planner Saunders noted the original document needs to be written first, then a second document summarizing the original document. Ms. Naiser concurred that the format of the Boise Plan was to be easy to follow. Planner Olsen stated the document has to be as streamlined as possible and be easy to use. Mr. Haggerty noted the County found that including the policies within the goals and objectives made their document cumbersome and found many of the policies were repeated. Mr. Alexander suggested that the background material at the beginning of each chapter be put into a separate volume, with the goals, objectives, and policies in a second volume. He stated he felt the public will go directly to the goals, objectives, and polices. City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 5 Ms. Naiser noted one plan she reviewed had a summary of the background materials prior to the goals, objectives, and policies. Planner Olsen suggested doing the user friendly version out first. Mr. Frost concurred. Mr. Noonan noted formatting can be a difficult task, if the information isn=t in place, it isn=t a complete document. Secondly, he noted the document will be used by developers, professionals, and legal people. Discussion followed on formatting of the Bozeman 2020 Plan compared to plans that were reviewed by the Board. Mr. Frost suggested getting this draft finished and out to the public, then make any changes after that. He suggested the inclusion of a table of contents with the secondary headings listed. Planner Olsen reiterated that she and Planner Saunders prefer the Board meet to make one comprehensive list of changes it wants made to the document prior to the final document being approved and published. Mr. Frost asked if the document included the need for a super-majority to make amendments to the plan. Planner Saunders suggested using a percentage vote. The Board concurred that a super majority would be 75% of the total City Commission. Mr. Frost suggested including the above as an objective following the introductory remarks. Mr. Haggerty suggested the Criteria for Review and Amendments be moved to the chapter following the introduction, either following 1.4 or at the end of the chapter. The Board concurred with moving the material to 1.4, the Planning Process. Mr. Haggerty asked if Chapter 12 could be included in Chapter'14. Planner Saunders noted given the weight given in the statutes, it should be a separate chapter so it can be easily found. The Board concurred. Mr. Alexander asked if suburban should be added to the discussion on core and strip discussion in the land use chapter. He suggested the addition of Adensity@ to the five topics discussed in the land use chapter. He noted a better discussion could be done on density in neighborhoods. Planner Saunders noted it is difficult to discuss as it is difficult to define. Mr. Frost noted it may be difficult to enforce the high density needed around the core area in a TND. Planner Olsen noted densities would be discussed with minimums as well as maximums in the zoning ordinance. Mr. Alexander suggested stating in the land use chapter that the transportation policies will support the land use plan. Mr. Noonan noted the discussion is handled adequately in the transportation chapter. Mr. Gallik commented the environmental quality and critical lands have no mention of the Montana Constitution,which provides the best protection of the environment. Planner Olsen stated she will include a general statement at the beginning of the chapter. The Board concurred. 2. Discuss meeting on February 271h to discuss Implementation and Public Services & Facilities City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 6 The Board concurred to meet on February 27th at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room. 3. Advertise Draft release Planner Olsen noted the Board needs a strategy for getting-the word out about the Plan. President Musser suggested the Public Participation Committee meet to determine the strategy. 4. Other Planner Olsen announced that the State Lands Board wants the State Lands tract along North 7th Avenue as industrial, which is different than what is shown on the Land Use Map. She noted the Mandeville tract is designated as industrial. She stated the State also wants the state lands near Taybeashockup Road designated as low density residential. The Board concurred with these land use changes. Discussion followed on the letter received from Mr. Springer regarding the goals and objectives of the Bozeman 2020 Plan. Consensus was to have Mr. Springer bring his information to the Board. ITEM 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS AND REPORTS ITEM 8. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Andrew C. Epple, Director Ed Musser, President Planning and Community Development City of Bozeman Planning Board City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes-February2l,2001 7 'a' Bog CITY OF POZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V 9� Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street Phone: (406) 582-2360 '�� 83_::.�e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406) 582-2363 cook Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net World wide web: www.bozeman.net Memorandum To: Development Review Committee From: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner Date: February 6, 2001 Subject: Northern Rockies PUD #Z-00171 Staff has found the Northern Rockies Planned Unit Development in compliance with the requirements of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance with the outlined conditions/code provisions and should not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The recommended conditions and/or code provisions for approval from Planning Staff follow. The DRC should forward any recommendations to the City Commission. Conditions for Approval: 1. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. 2. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 3. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 4. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, The location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman(Dept.)prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 5. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 6. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and-a slope of 1:4. 7. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch n 0 p than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings. .ca 8. The applicant must submit a written narrative with the Final PUD Plan indicating how all conditions of approval and code provisions have been met to the Planning Department. Each site will be required to undergo site plan review and approval by the Development Review Committee and the Administrative Design Review staff prior to building permits being issued. 9. The right to a conditional use permit for planned unit development shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. 10. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner.of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final PUD plan approval or commencement of the use. 11. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 12. Per Section 18.62.090, "Building Permits and Installation of Improvements", an Improvements Agreement must be signed by the applicant/owner prior to Final PUD Plan approval. If occupancy of any building is to occur prior to completion of all required improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be financially guaranteed. Code Provisions: 13. Per Section 18.65.070.B "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 14. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." Please be advised that additional comments and conditions may be provided by staff during preparation of the final staff report. i 6 Jami Morris From: Chuck Winn Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:20 AM To: Jami Morris Subject: Northern Rockies Professional Center Jami, Sorry I'm late getting these comments to you but hopefully enough discussion was held at the DRC meetings that this issue is already understood: The access provided as shown on the submitted site plan is acceptable to the Fire Department assuming all buildings are protected by approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. Should the owner/developer choose not to provide fire sprinkler systems in all buildings, all access, dead-end turn-around, and turning radius provisions of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code shall be adhered to. The site plan as submitted is not acceptable without sprinkler systems being required in all buildings. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact me at your convenience. Chuck Winn Bozeman Fire Department cwinn@bozeman.net Voice: (406).582-2350 Fax: (406) 582-2355 1 1 , DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: o o PROJECT NAME: (y. ,20cy1-.LA,p Zrnu" ?(An PREPARED BY: JpWW_- FILE#: Z !2o i-7 J APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: DR C MEMBERS PRESENT: p/ h'Ix s ct Voliz- , Project Engineer ❑ Craig Brawner, City Engineer Mike Certalic, Water Superintendent ❑Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service it Poulsen, Chief Building Official ❑Roger Sicz, Streets Superintendent Dave Skelton, Senior Planner ❑ Chuck Winn, Fire Marshall Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: 5 T DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING REVIEW SHEFT DATE: PROJECT NAME: koc k2,_Q.o PREPARED B : - Qwl ► M o y'r.S FILE#: Z— APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: .u=S� I(�sS D&B MEMBERS PRESENT: Dan Glenn ❑ Joanne Mannell Noel ❑ Bill Hanson 46ick Pohl YMelvin Howe Vim Raznoff VDawn Smith ❑ Henry Sorenson, Jr. Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: aA l u, t to c2A.d ,o� QCf 11 AMjukh&Q� Q j C1a� M Ud jTQD CccLn-,c--u ,9 UA _Eck. nrn c o n to .A f-v 0 /lAA GIn 0^,c CQ_ ( - � CkRQd'A L2 Tll]lAl� lJ LCAMMMAtiA.L) tO i �� .-A A OA he"A A 0A1:Q= CD� cf C��hh &L 4p otu— ` �cf MC � A 1 P � 1 • aLr � �I _L � � � �III u � I♦ a M- O . c '• immUMSM, • • ■ ' •• • • L� t f _ 1� I � _1.1 _1�� 1 _ _ •I �_ _� � � _ / J_�_• 1�I. Ism.! i t AT i �. SIR_ 1 /_ HIM iJI _ �� ♦ .rim /. ,. lolmw- P.P&ME5 AIDE, Woll"m no AIR MUM ice.. �•I_�% _ �..�. _ I♦ L' l L!�� s_ !. ..i��i_ , pl CJ�QG{ +w�-O�Sz CFI J04 ciz v DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: p PROJECT NAME: 'eo ct-v PREPAR D BY: �,`,�,, i(\/l.oP r FILE#: Z — o APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: DRC MEMBERS PRESENT: { lamed !Cm(¢� , Project Engineer ❑ Craig Brawner, City Engineer ❑ Mike Certalic, Water Superintendent ❑ Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service ❑ Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official ❑ Roger Sicz, Streets Superintendent ❑ Dave Skelton, Senior Planner ❑ Chuck Winn, Fire Marshall Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: Lk,0 00 nn 9-9 T DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: oc PROJECT NAME: N ,?nr.l2�� Pa Q Pre.k Av►. AaY J 1010-U- PREPAR D BY: ���,y� nA f i % FILE#: .Z - oo17/ APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: DRC MEMBERS PRESENT: y fir -u-'C] kol-lz , Project Engineer UYCraig Brawner, City Engineer ❑ Mike Certalic, Water Superintendent C/Debbie Arkell, Director of Public Service C(Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official ❑ Roger Sicz, Streets Superintendent Gave Skelton, Senior Planner QrChuck Winn, Fire Marshall Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: P to 0 U ' 9-0 } S, A--r-1 q-C c.a 12cl L�c.D G/a Ld�- c.ets�ar�.Qe so CITY OJ&ZEMAN � MPARINT OF PLANNING AND COMML1VITl'�VELOPMENT U 9� Ph6ne: (406) 582-2360 * * Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Fax: (406) 582-2363 20 East Olive Street E-mail: planning@bozeman.net o Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net 7�t 1883 �° Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 cook Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Tuesday,March 19, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. i The purpose of the hearing is to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan review of Northern Rockies Subdivision PUD,requested by C&H Engineering and Surveying, 2415 West Main Street, Bozeman, Montana 59718 representing Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, Montana 59715 pursuant to Sections 18.53 and 18.54 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Said application would establish a unified plan for architectural and landscape plans for the future development of a 7 lot,Planned Unit Development as an office/medical office complex on approximately 7.7 acres. The application would allow a relaxation of the following sections of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: 1) to allow primary building square footage to exceed the 60% lot coverage permitted under Section 18.26.040; 2) to allow a relaxation of the yard setbacks for each building as outlined in Section 18.26.050; and 3) to allow pitched roofs to exceed 38 feet on buildings with a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater and 32 feet for buildings with flat roofs or with roof pitches less than 3:12 per Section 18.26.060, on property located near the southeast corner of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street, which is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177C, SE%, SWl/4, Section 8,T2S, R6E, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is owned by Campbell/Lusin, LLC and is zoned "R-O" (Residential Office District). Oral and written public testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2360. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-00171 Northern Rockies Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat PUD SUBMITTED 03/01/01 FOR SUNDAY 03/04/01 DISPLAY AND PUBLICATION. PLEASE PRINT WITH NORTH ARROW UP, BOLD WHERE INDICATED AND SEND AFFIDAVIT TO PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE. O�BoZ� OF BOZEMAN PeARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMM iJITY DEVELOPMENT V9� Phone: (406) 582-2360 * Street address: Alfred 1\1. Stiff Professional Building Fax: (406) 582-2363 20 East Olive Street E-mail: planning@bozeman.net �t 8 a Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net t�r�N CO.Mo?� Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 REVISED NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public meetings before the CITY OF BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on Tuesday, February 6, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. and the CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 at 3:30 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Tuesday, March 19, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public meetings and hearing is to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan review of Northern Rockies Subdivision PUD, requested by C&H Engineering and Surveying, 2415 West Main Street, Bozeman, Montana 59718 representing Campbell/Lusin, LLC,3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, Montana 59715 pursuant to Sections 18.53 and 18.54 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Said application would establish a unified plan for architectural and landscape plans for the future development of a 7 lot, Planned Unit Development as an office/medical office complex on approximately 7.7 acres. The application would allow a relaxation of the following sections of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: 1) to allow primary building square footage to exceed the 60% lot coverage permitted under Section 18.26.040; 2) to allow a relaxation of the yard setbacks for each building as outlined in Section 18.26.050; and 3) to allow pitched roofs to exceed 38 feet on buildings with a roof pitch of 3:12 or greater and 32 feet for buildings with flat roofs or with roof pitches less than 3:12 per Section 18.26.060, on property located near the southeast corner of Higland Boulevard and Ellis Street, which is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177C, SE'/4, SW'/4, Section 8, T2S, R6E, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is owned by Campbell/Lusin, LLC and is zoned "R-O" (Residential Office District). Written testimony will be accepted and considered by the Development Review Committee if received by Monday, February 5, 2001, at 5:00 p.m. Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing before the City Commission. Written comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2360. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-00171 Northern Rockies Subdivision Zoning PUD PLI B-P _ . Subject Property R-S l�-2 Y OF BOZEMAN �p4 B�2�+ PPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMITY DEVELOPMENT 9x Phone: (406) 582-2360 R * Street address: Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building Fax: (406) 582-2363 20 East Olive Street E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net t61rIN CO.. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS AND A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of public meetings before the CITY OF BOZEMAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE on Tuesday,January 16, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. and the CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD on Tuesday, January 23, 2001 at 3:30 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Tuesday, February 20, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. The purpose of the public meetings and hearing is to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan review of Northern Rockies Subdivision PUD, requested by C&H Engineering and Surveying,2415 West Main Street, Bozeman, Montana 59718 representing Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, Montana 59715 pursuant to Sections 18.53 and 18.54 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Said application would establish a unified plan for architectural and landscape plans for the future development of a 7 lot, Planned Unit Development as an office complex on approximately 7.7 acres. The application would allow a relaxation of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance to allow primary building square footage to exceed the 60% lot coverage permitted under Section 18.26.040 and to allow a relaxation of the yard setbacks'for each building as outlined in Section 18.26.050 on property located near the soufhe orner of Higland Boulevard and Ellis Street, which is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177�-ISE Section 8, T25, R6E, City of Bozeman, Montana. The property is owned by Campbell/Lusin, and is zoned "R-O" (Residential Office District). Written testimony will be accepted and considered by the Development Review Committee if received by Monday, January 15, 2001, at 5:00 p.m. Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing before the City Commission. Written comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development Department, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the Planning Department, 20 East Olive Street, 582- 2360. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #Z-00171 Northern Rockies Subdivision Zoning PUD PLI R- Subject Property "0 R-S -2 H:\3672\001\ACAD\SiTEPLAN\POND-WATER-SEWER-REGRADING.dwg May/27/2003 03:03:48 pm ........... x m ................ A- t It M M NJ, it It ...... I C=) V:z C=1 Ez m ............ ............... I It .......... ......... I—A .. ........... 0 Co OD Co OD m o Co 0D co + .......... 3- ....... ...... 0 ---------- \% 1 0 J z z'D W 0 0 z \- -__- 4 I�+ ,I�,;;� I I ,; X'I lal I 0 (,n $Z 1-0 It I 1 � I I 1 I i 1 1 -� I � O \�, 1+'� I I I i+;,1;� � 1 � J ; }I 0 It Ak it .............. lit 0 + 0 --------- - II'�I III 0 0 0 0 \ ��I;. I t It C, 0 z I I It V It I I it � II III III ...... ...... ; , ' + ! it ;D It \ t fZ I III 1 ,` , t, it t A� \ \ i 1 I ''t , ! III It 1,1 i l I I II go z- > v , ,` !,' ' ' III ,1 I \,;`�, ,\ :` + '�,I '� ' I,Itil oil It It 1'` ;' i I I III I ' � % ,\ 1;,; �;`` 11 I ;� i,l x z 0 0 0 z Q c, ;D o 0 REVISIONS RA MLOL�Sll ENGINEERS THESE PRINTS MAY BE MORRISON REDUCED. LINE BELOW POND CROSS SECTION CHK-D. SCIENTISTS PP SURVEYORS MEASURES ONE INCH ON BOZEMAN ---M0—NT—AN*A A 7R PLANNERS ORIGINAL DRAWING. z NC. SINCE 1945 c, DATE: ❑ MAIERLEj PO B.IA.�pf�a�C-;-V 0 A RN:j Northern Rockies Professional Center 113,901 Te&Mogy 6W., BDzeffKu%MT7659771 BY phom(405)597-0721 1-(406)587-11 MODIFY SCALE LW-�E-O CWMW 011 MAIDILL W-2000 __,/\NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 6! ACCORDINGLY i • I • v zD ,u� w3� mom _-- ---------'JI ___��.��i= T7. 1 l_.L - __-- _"`� ----""_ --�C s•-�� � _ �t.:r =":-- ,•%=__= _,-- "-__- ' � �JIB�"' ���\\��� �-- =�-- FUTURE BUILDING _� \\\. _ _ - -` - -_C�,•. m.. _ / .� //////•'/ - 'r/ '7 �i .,� .,�... ,..�\ \ ��� W, .•\:�-',.'ram.�"-_�� __ - ,i ,,I�•: �'�R.• \ � 1 a Z —'N,. - \_I--- _ - - _ p� _- �- � � r,�l _- �,, \\\ \� \� \'!' \ c ------------ I Qi— Ht Ji- U F —Fr Uz- LOT 1 c I` � �_� Lill, i _ y` _o i._ __ __---_- ,_ ., _ SOT 2 _ JEl Q H c O M o o a�i N C n N V O 1.1 O WATER PROFILE o y 4870.0 d t FINISHED O Z -GRADE - _ w fi o 4865. : i LD Ix J N 4860.QY EXISTING --- --- ---f— '--- � o o 4855. 4" l w WATER I t 4850.Q I MAIN - 3 -- I -- --- ----- ------ - SCALE 11X17 0 Z 4845.0-. . .. _... . ... .- .. - _ _ _. ... .. .. .. _-. .. ...., - ._ ,. .. HORIZONTAL: t inch = 40 ft Z a VERTICAL: 1 inch = 20 ft Z 4840. W w 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 0 i m 0 a GRAPHIC SCALE PRQIECT NO. 3672.ODi o t IN FEET SHEET NUMBER n I Inch= 20 fL m M DRAWING NUMBER EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL 0.20 FT PP-2 H:\3672 001\ACAD SITEPLAN\POND-WATER-SEWER-REGRADING.dW - Ma/27 2003 - 02:43:10 pm , I 11 ) t � lili III Iliil l i " '� `'� � � illll � � Ilillil ! Illli / / / / � / Ut O p O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .29 I ........-......--.....-..FT1 -z ... I j � �\ \\ �••. ice; r / C: r( l I• J 1 / s. N m O r.z,� �x S i II S �II „N �+O m x z 0 0 0 z _ 0 c m D< n 0 n N Y> DRnWr4�. JCP REVISIONS VERIFY SCALEI MORRISON ENGINEERS y' = SEWER LINE PROFILE CHK'D. DY: ENGINEERS REDUCTHESE PRINTS MAY BE BELOW E m A BOZEMAN MONTANA SURVEYORS n APPR.BY: PLANNERS MEASURES ONE INCH ON ❑, MAIERLE INC. SINCE 1945 ORIGINAL DRAWING. o Z DATE: 5/23/03 A�sapaveroun.oa aaI= U4 m o OA REVIEW Northern Rockies Professional Center PO Box 1113,901 Technology 6Na., Bozeman,M1 59771 By. Phone:(406)587-0721 Fax:(406)587-1176 MODIFY SCALE DATE: NO. DESCRIPTION DATE R1' ACCORDINGLYI COM"0 MOff M MADRE•WG,2000 Q. I ,D tt00 O i 1 a� 5' wide Utilit -Easement T 153.00 N I �'_ I = 1 00 , f .1.79;5� 3 -. N. I i j I ' "� j [S00'08 3Qa�] �..c?. {:.. J M 1 ;} 00 CD CD Ut i`cc. . :�-..-�-•' (:i I� [N00'08'30{W] 359*51'30 11 17J'S1'32" ;f l 38.02 Z, tZ•6 [N00'08'30"W] ry.33.00 ie 00.5 !r `;' r+- o 359'51'30" !! ,�� f '•' �Or.y��-------- '•) I I i �',. .m 3 • t 93'51_30_"_! _.._ _—.�86c00�'.__.: ' .: :__['_ _o !' I I I t ° LA 0 r 1`: OO I J J I `^ I I ICi O co I D o m rco M O rt.5, I Q, O t �, 11, c r+' w .i L) .c I 'Jv I N t ' p p U)�, ► , I f 179'Si'30� h -- - I- i :--i___ I D [S06,08'30'E I I I I Cs1 1\ �' j, ! s. �; ,'_> ' 00,9 C. o 179'51'30" [S00'08'30"E] 35 513 "' p�a� U�> ?I O (o ..-- � �l � • 31 wide Utility basement �, ! " ' 1• 1,! uir.: i �=�t ( l ^)- it C�t7 1•!` v CAi' !� �� O c:..�� ,I i., I i� 1� tr p N 0 c0;,(-A v ' '�'`, is .� ;I �_� ll ; .. .. ..._..._...... .-}� •�} I'1 `1j-.`� ��P� � �. 1 Ulu cc 359'51'32".I I 11 �. 1 *r.'. 20 wide Utility « 1 • I: , iI 7.00 �J, �;�!' I Easement o o`° .� L Ln i' ! }. [N0o'0B'30"Wj yam:I o [N00'08'30"Wry`'',\ 359'51'30"s � , `�; 1�pljl ..... 359'51�30" ��'0` i'tr Z.r1L1�1 'f ` I • _ --�0.73_..:.: 4�.OQi -.._._..___..._.__.._..._:.1'`f}�50:.::_' 0•_ V ~� N n i c 1 .I' - - OO.LL11 I a p�� �'- I I , I I o a l t is 3 l . Nco O/' co °� I '� o to --� o" col tv f! o I Q e.OA.'' CO u' —� 6'I' ? • ul (,n o Q oo --I d I G D cn o Qo inl t it >— .-- - - - - -- - -- - - - - ,�L - - - -- - -- -- - - — 1 J -951 J0" 00_9Z 50--r:---:. . r4 li 001 -. :•1'i 4:99"�:c::: ..-:::._..._ L , O.LL 1 179*51'3t c I i,l t; 179-51'30" l } I! \�i; y* [S00'OS'30 E] �I '- .-. N�°i j �' '(zSO`0'08'30"E] ' U) 8.00 359 31'30 o iw ! o �� - J [N00'08'30"W] , }; Y,. Z }� N I 359'51'30" i t i r ! i� Do I` OJo q :.-. _._�_.... ... ...... ..._......_ .__..__ ._...._. Nfm 3 10 11 �io I li; � I _. _._._. sl ,ti) GOAD 179-51'34_" I I kl - �..__..._- - - 178.3303 -, 1 s- y•,; r�?, _\ c, co pia w l� ��.1`(-, cri rD ' ( _a w o 0) ._�. i; [,N00:08'3o"w] 0 0 !? I D p �':Ui o �c 359'Sl?30. ° I m � I �o r*i 113.94 OO.LLI I l J 75.00 ::. If I ON 359:i1'..;0"t •• •84:50--- -;} 11 Grit (; p i 179'51'30" � °' I Q [500'08'30"E] u' Q I �Fi�n p Qo 0l o II 212.87 _ 21 �...82 o---.10' wide Utility Easement LD 'I 0 •� !I , ., , .. ;l c0 y ti) g .30 'rj I � ` [N00'08'30"W] 3 0r✓j l ` ' i 359'51'30 I!' .r -Y I c S I ', ;� '11 11, �'I• ,� o OD I C) O I i ��.27 (D m -I i t '�J f. -. ! _.1....- J i o f `°- rn a 5'_wide Utility Easement (Ty�� , I 1 �- N p_. 1-f o 1t ... 11 I I .cli I •� _�..� I, _ :! 153.00 1ro. N N '� , `� `n '•� -:178*5113 , t N I ( I it •�' '� m I c O F '[S00'08'3(A1 :o_ - I I 'rr o B.00 I 21 i10 � �� ✓ tii 359 5�1:30. n ``,' 3 r A. cn cu M rn 1f [N00'08'30,W] 359'51'3011' 179'51'32 fr I 38.02 ZoZ'�91 ( iiiCA •' r ^ y_ J ] i �• [N00'08'30"W] r- �3.00 I;f I {- — -- p0 359'51'30" o •d: .35CD 97 57.00 I i I 1 1'; I co N'. I I o (� No M '' V 1` I o t a ' d I o I I i�, 0 A i "1 Z O W O O. t1 03 00 _ :! D � .r u; -- i ''' cow ?, �• �`' ss `1 M ;o r•'"`; I rn o I 11 3 v T cr [ 179'S13� I I- S00'08'30" 64 "66:62- o c.i f I. i 179'51'30 ii 1 ` ' O 't I t: I• O fl 1 �lyi .{' [S00'08'30"E] ' •:--�-- a' I Co Ll� AP J 6 c,, Ii io I �+" I 75.00-w--- 3595130 } i� \fir a I olra I .... r, cp 0 CA 0° - ; i r Imo_ 1,� a. Q II' 1� I 31' wide Utility..�asement ry Io !�! ;C3� < CJ1 cD l t,•r � rr f i Chi ;F ' ii •! C. ;.i I '; I� 11 '1•''•1 1'S � • J C>t 1 l 359'51'32"I ch. I 20' wide UtilityI ' ?' 7.00 �.I I Easement Ln [No0'08'30"Wj .••�.I i�: . pol';, tNOo'08'30"wt` '� ��- 1 ` ti. ! 359'51'30'!t + '� 359'51'30" U. Ii 's T!r-O (.....r ! .`I,CQ JCL• -� H 7 I • 14¢.oaf 120�o '_: .:�: 0'Co artiC�� �,�- .-- -- — -- -•••� �59�51'�Q'I r- --- -- •--- •-- -- -- -- — — - OD'SZ r �D m �P6ti� I ! ( I I O a „L 00.LL11l !3 1 . �� ��/ •' O J I— j r—�r-�I i N GI 1 9�,9. O I u'w I I r � W.Q ozo o 9'+92'30 co / I od I o cn � of —� 6' o -� d I G D cn o 0o r°Ito P. Rl p p A O O A O O -. OF,,,MDNT '- v1d .., ... Y. c, O BAYIISS WARD 'frun FINAL PLANI REVIEWED g APPROVt D Copyright Notice D PT.OF PLANNING Reproduction of this sheet AND C MM NITY DEVE end/or substantial reuse of M T this design without the Ilk express written consent of DIRECTOR Sayffss Architects,P.C. violates the copyright laws DATE / .O of the United States and wN be subject to legal INTERprosecution. WI DTHI5R1/2AFEET, INTERIOR SS BOULEVARD, SIDECopyright(c)2001 WALK, MINIMUM 3 FOOT WIDTH. Bayliss Architects,P.C. SHRUB PLANTING ACER 6. 8HRV6 PLANTIN66 _ '-MPAGTA'PHY50GA—O. EVONYMUS ALATUS WN DARTG GOLD R05AR - JUNIPIBU67. SHRUB PLANTINS5 PAOKE E—ET SYRINSAM �\ �--�-' NOWI[IeMOV LATU5 �� EU0N1MU5 ALATU9 l�-'`� RIlDItRR \ -- JUNIPERU5 0. ELLIS STREET I OO Cry' BERM Q. -r Qom,' �/ r4 000WGGL SHRUB PLANTING,ACER G. """M UIRS __ - -;��C aU' 'COMPACTW PHT900ARPU3 0. 'DARTS 60LD' WONAGE --BODYJWI{-� y_� �+ - y T�i.. LAPIN LIGHTING 1tIN1T-� - .�'� """C- sop �.. LOW PROPJL51 OT-T,T�-�-.� �J p t' LAWN _ PROPERTY RI BERM(1'O' NTRrbI6N- _ - II ^� CONTOURS) � LINE TYP. 'y glyry� '�� T• LA / 1 SNOW REMOVAL BOULDERS N 9 U., LA"�„ F STORAGE ARG VER5f� -r-r. �.ayE r r� - _ LOT4 - LOTS ��•_�/r rarer Ioit- I rt I i � 'l f r r' ..,;: ��$ �=�'�i ,.r'• � ��cwc — LlaNrvs� o�ao:.�,m OPEN 7A@LES( ? / LOT 5 O \1"A Da A." PAVED I NdLOSURCb p PLAZA - E�"�A� ~= ~ B \.: 'ti `•N�r .,-1 i YIITN BENON(1 - -- SNOW REMOVAL �STORAGE AREA _ � ® LAWN \:. LAWN � OW REMOVAL y LIG,IITING STORAGE ARG �_. \\ \ \�X\ I .. ` •..L _— _ - \ •• ` ® r ` aNOYI REMOVAL \ V Y~ ,4 GONG GRO ARG BULDWG, a 9TCFM � f ' I�. I{ W /r 516NA6E r♦ ICI 1 a — :il li-r '.TTITTT r Z� '?r,-rirr• I — _I» LOT l TABLES �L •` - �,• •J �-s PICNIC _ TABLE N.,,14.a eoR (. BAR@A6E e1]e AGRe UOMart ENCLOSURE LOT 1 rwvEa I aGsAc6Ra I -1 aa,a1I ap" NOW REMOVAL LOT T C I,A1(N 501) STORA6EARGC.. - `r / L16XTRlO J4L - � r"'I �---T-- -...Jam. I--'TT, - EXTERIOR LISWI OR ® ®{ / /� LIGHTING SNOW REMOVAL LIG,HTING ` STORAGE ARAREAI Cl I r`, /%' �'��r -I^_ 'fit JA:1L>•. --- 'I- - iti�° Y, _--` - I' _ 1= (.�-- J ` e / ,"�• PH L \-SNOW REMOVAL -LIMIT Or��50D LAWN L_ \ L GARBAGE SNOW REMOVAL ovne. SNOW REMOyAI. 1 SNOW REMOVAL ENCLOSURE STORAGEAREA LOT TYP. `SNOW REMOVAL I bTORAG,E ARG `-Bop LAWN OJNGRETE FEATURE PAVEMENT �PROPERT'f IINE STORASEARG GUTTER TYP. \ STORAGE ARG L SogI TYP. AT BUILDING STORAGE AREA ENTRIES TYP. ENCLOSE 6ARBA6@ ENGLOS4RE nnCNIrzErS v.C. ENCLOSURE SHRUB PLANTING I�1, ROSA RTHEREBE 6NEr 41 9YRIH6A M.PALBm' i f'1 LAtNV5CARPE PLAN 1, baV11SS 1 50ALE:1 0'5 -O" L 1.1 PLA4T LIST ' LEGAL DE5GRIPTION Symbol r Tract C.Gertlfleete of survey No.11'I16 ` LL@ptllNpa).L,1me Common Name OTY. PLANTIN6812E MATURE MTj.IADSg5G� !Intl TREES located In ._J Ace saccharum'6reen Mountal Breen Mpunta(n Maple 9 S' 5E 1/4,51Y 1/4.5eetlon b,T.2 5.R b E of P.MM, liCE'.Letarlpaat ___ Taterlan Maple, --_.-._-B8 6'0'hL 2s',___-2a_ Revisions C mseguearue-gall)Inarmle L'ruield Orueader Zwthdrn ev b'O'fit 1S' 7d ballattn County,Montana Ices pungens coloredo Breen Spruce __21 tCh6 B11 2g NO. Desc. Date Pop trelnuloldee Ouakln Mpan 22—f-17260 • R b nla pSeudoaoael.yw•pb R.pbe' Purple Robe Locust 4S 2'Caw 4O 9d • Tnl oordata'breemplre G,YeeriSpire LlrideN '5 4O to SHRUBS Ater glnnele/Eupr ompe a 4 1110we" 4ympe Slat.. Bur, Bh 2 bat Yunlper.u...I...u III�-Buffafo7imiper 4B�6a yspparpUE p Igollus-bertf 6GW Dart.Gold Nlneberk 45 6a1 y Roa9 rugase TM1e Bugrev Therese Bupnet Rosa 4S ,Bel li 9yrfliga meywl'Pallbld Dwarf Koraan Lllec 4S 26.1. 4' NOTG TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINCS SHOWN WRHIN BULDIN6 LOTS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST. NOTE,ALL LAWN AND PLANTING,AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. Date 155ued: 0-1 6-2001 FINAL 51TE PLAN Drawn by: ML Checked by: By, - JOB NUMBER, 2020 Ll8I 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN Bayliss Architects, P.C. Is212 South Tracy Avenue •Bozeman, Montana 59715 Is406.586"5007 ph • 406.585.8337 fax • baylissarchitects.com + a a • O A 0 0 0 0 Q Q 0 0 0-1 CITY OF50ZEMAN BAYLISSWARD Ec.eAr—PLEX d IPA EU PARCEL 1 COOMOT SAW—EgMeR AWV�TM #1697 1 ZONED PLI LIFE Or MONTA14A FWS/D* PATCHATCOWLETOWNIT "KANVBLVV�A) ZONED BP VW�Al U V RF6ONCRETVCAR046VrrEIt VMTMPA ENT ATI�3 WO KE.=em�&F RWTOEASTON TK�ET UNDEVELOPED 00, STO—M ) / rwsleped Poe —5VEAALK*4OrA?AKTOFFTWGPWJMT4, iS ".bar." VOW; rrAs/. 60 -,17 7 5TANDARD A"WACM MR 02524-11 Copyright Notice BEN".AftK, Reproduction of this street w OF STORM /F1 1,11WR1. IftTAU.PE and/or substantial re use of W&.WMV this design without the -9, express wdttm consent of Bayiiss Archh-ts,P.C. __7 violates the copyright/am a.—o of the United States and wi7l be subject to legal 40prosecution. 46�2 \LOT��5 '0403 2t1 Dn' Copyright @ 2001 Bayll-Architects,P.C. LOT 5 *--4 ,o REL00A Z.1. 64I�. VIM 1&A ostft4 fry M ..Y (M 045 ri67Nq.,o S2q- 16 ,bw as) \L\ �I ...BOZEM N DE E Imo' f ,(ba/51 60.451 GtOi6 ae00// r I ZONED'PiO!""Y III Are ElaSrxd, aL„ q.,-U `ZE 6 D 42 1 0, x / ii33ff11 ' \ \ ;F��r �-H Z 4 21 /L, /Z-12 —"IT B0Z1!9AN PEA M99 09PMAL 1041.54 CITY OF BOZEMAN LIMITS ZONED A-S —Aeo 210-51.9cM) 0 UNDEVELOPED Cn RM.6. �\\\\\\ M �31A X SITE FLAN -_q ONEV R-2 Traet� �;l i Rai 11 LEGAL 12ESGFEFTION 0 Geniflaste a Survey No.I I 11C N II located In _O" W-0, 4!-1 CP' W� UE 1/4.SM 114.5_tIOM 8,T.2 5.R.6 0-Of PJ 34. Callatlm Countq,Monters 1506E or- iV CURB 0 0 O 4'r-ON0.PA CUT CURB AT FACE U_ CF OF b b ENCLOSURE 50 CONC. PAD 15 EVEN WITH ASPHALT PAVIN6 4,TYP. 0 0- S b J .......... COARSE TEXTURE 9100AALK—J Y41 COLOR CHANGE bayliss n HANDICAP RAMP ASPHALT LUMMG"VOMUW SERIES NtLl,/ SGALM 1/4--1--0- PAIANG DIKE RACK TO BE PRIMED 2xB CEDAR CAP PLAN VIEW VM550-50 AND PAINTED-FAINT COLOR,TO MATCH EXPOSED 2x6 CEDAR TRIM EXTERIOR STEEL T-0" 1 xr,CEDAR CHANNEL 6.PIPE BOLLARDS SI(SNS TO MEET RevI Tom RUSTIC SIDING 4'PIPE BOLLARDS MUT612 PAINTED R AIN POLE 5TYLE LTCWr FIXTURE E(RUIREMENT5 FOR No. Ve5ac, Date SMrF_ SIZE,REFLECTIVITY Tyr.. F-7 HEIGHT MT6.HEHT F7- iI SCHEDULE 40 SONOTUBM PIERTY, L O.V. &ALV.STEEL T POST Mate Issued, 5-16 -2001 FINA L L A J WNCI PAD 5ITF PLAN 14 GOMPAOTEP ii U Drawn by: ML +-1/2"(P 6"COK0. Checked 11y: EIA 1011ALK FRONT ELEVATION 51PE ELEVATION CROSS I I 1 BASE DOWEL, TYP. JOB NUMBER: 2020 CONC.FT&. A1.1 PARKING STALL DETAIL(tt4p.) BIKE RACK DETAIL 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL HANr�)IG_AF PARKING 516N Z) LIGHT FIXTURE SITE PLAN 1.1 SCALE:114"-1'-0" 5r-ALE;1/2'-1'-0" 1.1 SCALE:1/4"-1'-0' \A .1 5CALE!1/2--1'-0- 1.1 5GALr:5/4"-1'-0' - Bayliss Architects, P.C. 4,212 South Tracy Avenue e Bozeman, Montana 59715 • 406.586.5007 ph * 406.585.8337 fax a baylissarchitects.com .. . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERJ' �t �f� /G"�L �1 CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION TO CREATE 7 LOTS.- - ®'-• -'-[ Jf G r SLR' We. the undersigned'property owners do hereby certify that we hove reused to be surveyed, subdivided and OWNERS: GARN H. GREINER, KAREN S.EGREINER - lotted into lots, btocks, streets and one and other mysons and ded,cat'ens as shown b GARY F. LUSIN.L:LC.; CAMPBELL, L.LC. 4 � e ) r i 9 / rr"-a - _ ® ® �p/ ;.) p ys, y me pia« nerelmto `J_ ��'� fT /y _1 � � I •�� �`-• 7 ®� _ included, the following described tract of land, to wi[. LEGEND - - (`:1.,:=.✓'�m[,r/- tli"air% ,':16�1/� f LEGAL DESCRIPTION (R):. RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH l_.Li,, 1@:;. Tract C.Certificate f S-ey No. 1177C, according to the plat thereof, an Fie and of record in the office of LOCATED /N THE SE 114 SW 1/4 OF SEC. 8f T. 2 S. Re 6 E. theCl,,, and Reca der. Gallatin County, Montana, and located in the Southeast Quarter of the Saathwest (M) MEASURED.-DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH Cn Ft f Ouer_-. of Section 8. Township 2 South, Range 6 East of P M.M., and bong further described as fellows: s FOUND S/8 INCH'REBAR WITH 1 1/2 INCH OF P.M.M., GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA - Beginning at the southeast'Corr, of said Tract C. thence we -69' 51'30",a coed anm,uth from north, 1097.34 feet along the south line of said Tract C; ALUMINUM CAP OR AS NOTED thence narlhedy 000'06' 31" muth 21..87 feel along the west tine of Said Tract C. thence easterly 019- 16' 14"at/math 109.65 feet along the north line of said Tract C, O SET.5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH - coerce easterly 079' 24' 12"azimuth 495.61 feet along said north line; Please Return To thence Install oat 5 os'o,imath 1aGG5 reef alon said nar:n Trap PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518E5) CITY OFBOZEMAN -tnrncc east'-� 7•' .,math 323.73 fee:awrg said-c - PLANNINGBCOMMUNITYOEVELOPMENI - thence saute-holly ny 53 J16"az;meth 365.47 feet along the east Ire of sad trod C, 20 E.OLIVE to the port of begmntg. BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: THE SOUTH LINE OF BOZEMAN,MT 59715 TRACT C, COS N0: 1177C, BEING 269' S1' 30" - ' Alec = 335,017 square Feet, 7.6909 cores or 31,124.1 square meters. Subject to a*istiha eaaements. [N45'00'00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZIMUTH SHOWN the above described tr,_t of rand is fa be known and designated o; NORTHERN ROCKr-s SUBDIVISION R.u.D., City of Bozeman, G011abr, County, Montana: and the 'Old, included in ail streets. avenues. alleys ana parks ar public squares She.. on said plot are I,erelby granted, donated, and dedkaled to the City of Bozeman far the public use and enjoyment. The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every pemen, firm or corporation, whether public v -r:vate, providirg provide or offering to telephone, electric power, gas, cable television, w wer s w seire to the public, the NOTES right to the joint use of on, easement for the construction, maintenence,e repair and removal of their lines AREA TABULATION and other focn.l es. in,over, under no across each area desaralee an this plat as 'Utility Easement' to I. Entire property lies outside of 100 Year Flood Plain. have and to hod forever. AREA OF LOTS 81;451 SO FT 1.8699 ACRES _ - - - ?, No wetlands are present on the herein described property. - r Doted this_day of E.isting Zo P-0 20J-. REMAINING AREA = 253.566 SO FT 1 5.8210 ACRES - � 3. - - John F.Gnf!ner I!aren S, Gre;dv (OPEN SPACE, PARKING AREAS. DRIVEWAYS) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING TOTAL AREA 335,017 So FT 7.6909 ACRES - PARCE. I. Co. This day or n the year ZOO_, before me - - - cas tie.a-_s-x a Notpry %tak for the State of Washington, rerscnally apeepred John H. Greiner and Karen S. G,einer, `1-cuo ecci r.ci; _ known to m rs e to be the paer., arose names are subscribed to the within instrum ac en! and knowledged_ - to me that they executed The s ^al`al ea�m'- In -witness'.v hereof, 1 have h.ereentaset my hand and o£fNee my ofhcior seoi The day end year ,n this certni:11e first above written. residing aI- F- - yr rAP.Y VIJ BLIC. FOR THE STATE GF S!CN7?NA- my ccrr:mrssian exPires - rM S/S ftrom eIN 1 I/I A'ww oen Ia - - -_ GaRv E LIJSIN L.I.C. PARCEL i _..__ _ - ..tN87'a0'37"E] ._ _..�.. Ec,cd t day o _ ._ _ Trio sA'aev.lm- 32402-(R) ._ _ _ _.._._. Gary Lu.m G-.,dent - lea s/e'ana con _` I _ !�-Wns�.(a*- - - _.E - ` rk' b rJTA JA by •ar F. =- r�•+- C;O .25:53 .. '1 r;rE(: 11/2'us,.can(ftT c') -T1£ �,N6�79.98" �(R) ��--_ B�'� ��= _ -- Cnt this OFlNlY ICdof�lof nten,t, .wally r, I year -r"7 ..fares-de nl of GAR,'F. L1.51V, LI,C"ctory °.Mile P101 25' a ..3.7 /z Arm ca(o ) to to trio n an V I I c t. ne me fa o „n for awua w mar sh.el rill _ _w. �„�--���. r o,a lu i•I ) I \ - Liability Company. I I it hie" I y I�I !eve he euh labsethm hand and offi«,dperson mosa e scoff Subscribed cn e.al the .,n V Ig\ � s/e'aa k ytd y my l Ir sda L'r�ted flat et RYJ4l..l•Atl1 eLO:a� _.•_`• ,1,41-� YI yI$ I - \ r ---. n this cent Icate first sba,e -;tier. M 8 �- 1 r e - I I a roc e,.bon-adrq -tp79' (R) ,�.,5't'1' .....- _-.• ,,66 � r __-BO-9, -7 \ I r I•y _. OB700'}7 f \ .nn / (a _ 23' - B .-..- lea s/e•aoa --I,- I i. t 'v re--d'na at a�' ,r.,- .• .._ -- 49g 07.. El,l ...._,_. 1 } -_._�---_-\ -fir r oe7 olY]7\ I [Ae7 ao}7"E] - al cores -- r a ., 5 - _- 7V }� - NOTARYDLC ., TIIL 3r,.TE a JJIJ..IA umm5,on IA BEL L.L.C. � (M f L. _..... -. J z6z � `' \its . [Na a'7 7\� '�-� `\ I R - e -"T}a 9zlw 07$'24 ->-. - r.. `I. {ea tT• .- I LOT 4 ) aM� I LOT rJ�_, I,: Doted this _Frday or_- .r2O0_ 456 so FT 7 m m by _ 1 10,323.5 SO FT 10. c yr w qg}8t03 )R) -15�fiz Jw,Ak1� hen crez d2nl [N ( '"'' 2J70 ACRE I 0 ACRE - es10g7g _ .. I LO - I � sir - r+ . ..«-^. to"E� - .. ^T°b:73� - r- � F! e.no soJT � a„ �_�, z�r a I � r� OT urlr�ctt ira�rfl ✓� �P179'10B•1Aw % _��-r 1 ma" 0.1662 ACRE �'�"ti :5 - \'I - \0 0n to-s f __ trio year 23e total, rn ---- n Vocr,ry Pptl'c " I a zN. zoo 1 yea m'e. a i s _ dl)7a9e L- -J y I \ �, r tile t t J J h U malbell e n PF pre;dear of CAM�`BFL(. L-LC 1 V - wdtrsr. b __-_ -- _--- I I J t l.. rn. , b t G_rser. who-•e cw ___ __. pc .. _ I L _ _._I --raoo reme Is dsubscr b hd ;._ z Raw - '� .R and Storm ,- / ts5.co i OPEN ' ' I •..\,\ I \ _._ __ t �r,tn men, o.+ _da J me that e cut-d the s me It au cf c' L •2a i - 1,:.w d. zsesr}o• .._..-' -.) SPACE _ \r 93D :-1 h.+aL l t c I,l cent/ "n aoc nereuntu , e. nnnJ 1ha a1F _J arr�_aI ,.za c am.. year - . ,I-e gr - T_ [469 suo•w] __ - __--.. ' L as as I- ,I .I [sea sloe"wl, {- ._ e m, Trig °ea ae a e r_- - _ _ -_ - _ _ - - - - ..g1'ses'slaow ` ----- ._._._,� viLv 1 I/a'rl'c \: N99'S1'30"E _..... .._..._ _._-- -' 1(__61-}0 3 ��-._-1$ __.,I 1 e W vW ... n, r,q 5/B'R,Am can \ 3 i -„Y pill._. _-,-.-..- .. _.-..,__ _. ,.,._.._,.[t.6�51'i50"f]t _ ��TN89:57;Jp'E1 IJrj T}T3R( PUBLIC FOR THE STATE Cf M711TAlIA mise,on eKP'e5 `J8351'30" � 1.-T I 0895130" 1� 1' .6 si'00"_ - I ��V m� - Tr r ,� eon-4oiele) 'r I -_-. � -_ .. Y m 1 ,. .... 9 C40t1:`^___�.. 90.Od vial i rya°ue _ -,_ + [N6951�o'E7, t j✓T e_ _ Itf uo via CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR gg - _- L ?o"ryen / •I -...: o69s,�a•J _ \ \�\OPEN 3 -- - T- I ..r1--- --1 1 rInoo o ? - /. '--�.-� .:) . ".14e.tp 5P[SCE ' �' / �m �'N _ _ I. lr A -'wordier, o S oho Ens nee, crd , _ r No a513 ES. al hereby c rliy that r v R - - v£2• a aurvevc , - - -- �, w ,-, OF MONTq bet 20OC rand kla' 300 so"vBd NORTHERN H F ES o J 1 is N ".J G ,; I o�- I``LOT 7 I �' _ = - �9 - - '�- \ r�. \� I I LOT 6 1 AR i Ai `^�49` and pl tt d the sane as shriven on 1ne a. g pane t and ae u bee oar_" -ton. S;d1•.sa, PROPOSED PARKING LOTS 3. ! �- .. -% Imo \, and Piuttin Act, Seal ors.76_j._1f11 fhrouch J r a •• I "�J 9 4.5 SO FT o h y 7,605 5 Fi '- / ? r n9 F a Ti �^ M't w mL^ A o I LOT 2 \` \ \ o.' 4B ACRE I g '+ 1" ��4"MARK A 9 9Ave, ors. ao M // j wI -1• 11,791 50 FT I\ I u 1, 0.1746 CRE a o I E h ;6-3-ti?:. 1+C A.. and ache B.T, Tn Are S Abe--.,Sven Pegu,a rq awl fi o p s i o oa�lO �. : LOT 1 ��� I 0.2707 ACRE I _ N tl cFIA1VOLER it oared tn;s day or 2GG_ t: - - T3 O Nrlo / A• I nNo. 951SM al y oQ o w R6 zJ.J7/so FTC Roo I -----� \ I ' ---- -� i i w h;; Marb A rn dl r Z !t F a1 zr z " ,-n" / 0.5365 A t \ `� o o Montane Re;sprat on rio 951 a �;; y� ! f T - I a �I '� 1 t-ss `\ \ \ \ In �, I salmi- -I t T a`Z' _ `:s 'Pfsl sT6P�' p?�. argi l ul" I I / al l L- J- �' zy9's1'30' I I '�, \ \P,,,.> _ li v F,(w," "'1�",` CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OP PUBLIC. SERVICE - �Sl� I \-F, 269'91'30m j NEL�.... t - �.._....t..__20.00... d'rn'-coo' �� _.`\ � `6 \ \ ..1 i LSB931.�. I L 1 �✓1 I till 3 I / I 28951'}fY 4�\ I o. a \rl r r� I. '•�, I- qo\ _ f,, _ J' �I I [seasl•3a. gl 81 \ \81 ry P b c Servce Gt <r !nd then me y // ha +y ..a r d end 'Jos fal,nd the =acre lc Q efarm to the Wfw Copp-eshat 'heJt. crd hereby la.-,to 5 wide Utpti y EOsement T J -v m "y \-g J .'y `, _ th_ .edcafbn to the Cty _ __•-Ian far tie putt .r, of any and of ones shover+ on the plot a.. \ ; - L � _>-u- _..i -ra _--�' rid - \\ I 51/a pwea.Sr_S J to - .,e. L_La__.�_. L= / ,sa.a6 -; I I I I ` _ �I lee,'ed,ft. being dedicated _Lcr u -� I 1 a 25.82 S 14B.91.---_ A. I r34.ad --- IBT:95 .�- -.l_.' 1f07.7.._--......_,....��- 2591 \ 71.00--r __9(Tba I--- S�- • r38.a0 `. ___.. _ .,__61 Doted t'n,s- day of 2M- _- Ra s/e aeee� All s/e'a 1097.34 233.40 - - lull/ ,pe\�II/are ( -) eases f•"ao M O \ (M) D"aetoo of put, rc Service I - 2SW51e3e( ) - \ 08957'22" Cty of Bozeman, I4anlan0 �• �f I se. SE Coe Tract C,COS NO. 1177C CERTIFICATE OF RELEASE OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS 3 1097.81 (R) z Fnd 5/8"Reber with 1 1/2" r s [S89-51'30"W], C\ Alum. Cap (PT"L") Ths plot is within the Cry of Bozeman .fontora, Masts. Flm- Area, POINT OF BEGINNING `"' a ur prous ens,f, ,e_ti.,n € 4 ch.(11. a-.d II lie pro e d .th n -a pal facilities far the 'ply i w d the pawl seu,o• and crd t. iherefgra -u der±he this subdivision IS not subject tc S, Jory restrictions. r - Dated this_. day of 200___ _- Director of Public Ser -- - Ciity a£ L-emar, blartano CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS ZIT We,.;ahn H. Greiner, Karen S. r_ Gary I. Lusm Jahn D. Carl and Mart/ fh .dared - pra(es_iona 'nc, r licensed to rpra.Tce ,n the State of Montana, do nerebc :artfy thc; t tel:",i requir_d cs o co hdi,c I, of aop-1 of the plot of NORTHERN ROCI,iES SUSDP;ISION F.U.L.. '',o': i_..•, nslahed in confom,rnae with the approved plans and specifications' an'tory So- s and Se .cols.-',Voter Mains and Servce,.Street improvements.a radian of the sio-cl,.s and ;term d-ci•,a5e imp cver:ent; „n Ellis Street. T•,e- sutew der h sty w .-ants'agciret defects in these Improvements for a poll" cf arle year fr rr this VICINITY MAP - the suhdividar grants possession of as public infrastructure improvements to The City of E ., the C'it; hereby accepts p-S,i ion I It pu,l+c nf,cer.ctu`e 'mprovemerts. sfb;ect to the a'co-inctroted w Dated tn'c dg•: of 20C a -• till. { .._t Mark A Charlie,. . I 1{il_f GARY f. LUS'.N, L.L.G_ `.lactana Re•i s rc;ton N. ')Fit BE<. y f By - ' Il )an 1 JCn 1-1, `,e r. ry c. L p :-dent 4 a ___7i-'�.. JJc'r_.ELA.. L.l�. ___ --ub 11" 'f �c�"• •..,' - _ l; fr Bcz_ l Tirane Scale In Feetl=,--' „snn c.�,mhce o•esv_r. - CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER 60 0 80 rag _ j• .._ - � - _.,.. ! - 7 i (,f ,efr Krause. of T. 'b H. _ 18 0 18 1 -I �I __• 1 assessed and Ih- been a,. ,r. Ihed.ndd.a�< rdvt cl l,r,tc hip- when n _ _ loll., Yirg .t l- �c . Scale In dlete'ra 1�r1 -.... pa a. / !/yI.- [ Jclyd this--- Jay o 2t;0- -------- Depot, Trens,.rer cr Gallat,,:County 1 a i, CLERK AND RECORDER ENGIP7EERING AND NOT TO SCALE 1, Shale/ Vance, Clerr and Recorderof Gallatin county, M ,[ana do hereby aorrry that �ryrlry�7y YI INC. _gc'ng 'rstrumevt w filed y office t _ 4 b+ this___dry of JVdbYL'liNGf dNlir. tile far---_-_--_ AD. 200 and r-oral in Back _ of plots, Page , records of the Cl- and R ,ripe. C l ol,� Con-Ty, ...,,lawn , •CYra F.nlrineermg•Strsetural Fngfecerivg•Lvnd Surveyfhp - - - - - 2410 West Main Street,Suite 1 Bozeman,Montana 59716 - -- - - )18)567-I115•Far.(405)507-9768•ehen¢mrrnitite,lobal.net DATE PREPARED: 12/11/00 - - Document Number ___________- By: _ repary uerh and Recorder 00220(MJ) P.U.D. FLAN M R R0aX.:T FROPUSSa U CEUTER NOTE: _ Fnd 5/8"Reber with CONNECT SANITARY SEWER AND WATER!FI `.f =L 1 1/2"Alum:Cap(PT"K") TO EXISTING MAINS AT COMSTOCK APARTMENTS COS 140. C--38-A _iFE CF',17:.MINA -!- _ .. FUTURE CONCRETE CURB k GUTTER - i OI r.[ 3P AND SIDEWALK(NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT) �;wD!- .II't li_ - - HYDRANT 3 O)^ P A`IUI EL...'_, .. S 8 With _ _ - __ Find Reber PT.C") _ �n4-5�� R4 � .e=-•--' - Co" ^iG A. 11�2"Alum Cap( �-- -__ T •:.._v�tfix..-_ !`5�1 z � 'rl!L_ ,?I= i' �__..": _'-_.. -�.r ..-: ^-/_,.,.y F ._.-.: •. o- � 2_53 • '15 E}-... lL'li ,, Q A9 7 R81 STENTJOWATER\ . ... / >' ,M1 1-..� l _ PHOt•1 ---_ '_- _. N VAULT NEW SSMH-1 - - __ v" m - ;Y_` _ 14 .. - - - -_ !' 'NOLUME=3885 CU FT\X. g - Portion of Ellis Street per Cli"Ci dCZEU.AIA ?ECREAT;O"1 COUPI`X Plat of DRUM LUMMON ADDITION - s°�`r�� T - - - .2) - -\ --T-- k'E d Fnd 5 8"Reber with - , ' '°•� `_��-~__.--_. w t. 1 1/4 YPC(Merrimn-Mderle) _- - .:e'%'-- -.• .',� _ _.--_r - ez _- \ pal-EXISTING SSMH-23/ ^'9.55 (534___... c 4 _ c Si l ) IiP.•" _ HONE -38 i' - O RIM=48.4 ,.• -p s - FL-43.0 -: _ =_ �...•--r"'`- (:.S) r l-- ,-_-...�' :. 53:931 -. - � rJv� 9F?1CHMVRK: 9628(R),_::....d 5f8_Rabar w Sr-' )'"� ,.:•.n .FY7u.�4-4..�..j ._9) .,: - 1 - \_ T R N F ___.::> Fn _ ,rt;alrt(P vcl.,.. ._L. ..2.C12._j5. ,, --....--*(5�1):.r-.- •-•r_ -_ x(59.1) (58.7} 58.0 - 55754. LOT q' �, - LOT. 0 OF CRTH SIDE G STORM DRAIN - - .�q g2�g)' f'_..1.2"-.Ptuttt" _.-:�„y. u ..07a 1,--tr5�-.}-- --_ - ( )1 1 56.2 ) 10,323.5 SQ F7 .-..54;-12), ST ___---_-_ _--.-- I ..-._.. (59.1) :i.. (58,0) _- _ _ _ELEVA7!ON 48"7.80.FEET .--r'-- y - ( ( '�- 0,2}7 ACRE 10.240 ACRE HYDRANT 1s _ _ - _ J (CITY OF BOZEL'AN OA U61) ,-:I -. �,;_ .� ,S `" {"` -.-� --��_ 59.2. B 4 n s _- ( - WA�_R VALVES _. - Ba3 O 1 _. .. r: . -. _o HYDRANT g2 �„ N -.O - - _ LOT 3 I ___._ -OPEN _-- ..- 1, F.F.ELEv-48.5 AND 58.5 I 4g;3� (46.9 46 j \ .F.E[EV-32o AND a20 i. .__.r._. __. ro _ - ..-,.. kt `9)t ., • _. _ -.-. i.-�__.- - 7930-'.-f �� 8110.1 SO Fr I -C \ (47.2 I �\ 0.186 ACRE- SPACE. ......-.. r. �, ...�•p -. _ -. -- - F.F. 2.0 AND 7 __._. _ ,-- ( N 1 ' RTI ON . �•-.SNOW STORAGE __r FOM ROH I 47.3_(47. I - q--_--- -1: ::a r. -`;-�' .�` - '9-5u- _ r._- •_i.�.-- :24x2@� _ _ ....__._. __.__ \. ___. -._ _-_ )(42.5) o .A., < 1 :i•>� -� :. .65-_.. _:.StAfiR'-. 1. ----- \+ I--- ------�_--1 2 - 0O2+-rl -_.' 8}-I-i._I.J:. .• - 1" 63,3 r -(622) .. H70flAN T E� Q ) al - �HYDRANT p6 (48.0 -� K - I x I T _ PH - l:-e - x :(63.{3)z �:.:. _ \ 3.8 >t...... b2 8.9} (--'-- -'-- -Ix -J (48,91 I(40:1) • B l 01" PHONE IpyaONE _Ci I` .p. .... -- - 64.5)_� y- - o - "DIP W !._63.6 60.4)1, 48e0 7.1 (5.45) (39f4 3;)'- t Fnd'.5/8"Reber \ ' 3 _ / _ - -- F FI R (m{h 1 1/4"YPC - _ 58.3) r� - (60.8 (62.6 .' 64"9)u (86.1)._..... -� \ 6 DIP W, �,� GPaC L'js '�n� �:�,.-.: 58:45 .p i,,,, I I I. L. (86.0).. �//. (65.95)x .. 20 PVC ~ O, 44 41.95 ........ ,��a 6. x 1 __. _ -Fnd 5/8"Reb'ar with ..-. .67-0)._.... - _ ,S 8 5 NEW 5547.63 45.41.1 .15 ( ) rti� •�1 ,�. ) \' ; �,I _,cv - ...P- ] (60.85) 61. E� I. J. I I •'�. I,. '66.>)x � .. .._(66.7) e_ � (.,_.._(68.95 -. ,� t _I ' 66'25.1 61.8)(60.5 �' S3.3)•.(50.27J (41.68) :? 1 i;4"YPC(IIAorrisan-Mai^de - - - _ -- II ( - I G HYDRANT.;g7 ) - 6 (60.2) (s o)x - - --= - ----- (sfi.6s)x ( {r-g -- - - --- - -- t3 .89, 68.1 � 'Is. 5 x(67. 75 .:65.9 (62.3 61, r -.L (53.2) -, 68.15).. .. - 5. ) -OEEN ` r I -- (69.fi _ 5'C NC TE IDE ALK - ---- J ! r - ) (ao-2}- - (s i" _SPACE -- LO'" 7 _ 4`SS SE_Ito. !_ _--- --_.___ __ t_-.. I.. 1 g r.....-j _ rE�^-.__ i ."I ��-----?�: !,:..t_ r - .' - I 9,794.5 50 FT - 54.24 j - LOT tD ,i_ ... (36.85 O I I ! I 1.'•III1 _,�:^ .2���^^------���(60.45) I _ / j I.. J ...__... A _ \, i.. ...' \0.223 ACRE ) _- 7.605.0 SQ FT !_� (60.85 I�A�iT....Cr �_'' ;:✓ 3 - - - \ w 1 T ,� 7 I I 75 -I (41.2) 39.0)x a,l , s:•1-,I. ;",•v x(60.6) i i(61.7 I ./ __-.._ - 44 ._.. '35:017 So Ft .. _.LDT..2 - �\'> 2 F.F:-ELEVm5T.0 AND 65.0 4 B) _. '• ,. AC i - - (39.15 t _ ! (69,5),- 63.8) - I - - > _ 01 .. '.69D9-Acres... : t •� : _ m - � - ? 70.5 70.6 �l((724 (72.4 791. SQ FT _ X(70.4� � \ \ , F.F.ELEV=42.7 AND 52.7 - ( ) )_ 1102711 ACRE 21 .__. t LOT 1 s4o O j 1.4 FT / : c I n. ('L.. F.F.ELEV=85:4 AND 75.4 •, , o.o f... 123.37 SQ ,I m I 1 _ : '\ Zj 0.537 ACRE H' -1 , --- -r- (66.2)- _ \ -- --- ---- ---F---J 1 --- - - - : ,.. :; ._ -._. Jj.,r. ..• ', .�-_. .-._._ .___._._ ,__,_- F.F.ELEvv62.e AND 72.6 -.- .•.. .�•._ ._�_�_:�.: �, I � ;� 71.85} (5245 44.15I' - 1 :y73.3 72.0 ( /.7 "\(64:35}. �52.55 ! '1 r 44.5)e �I. j ,-• I',. ,.� x x(61.7) I: I, I:_ti).. { (74.6) - .. ,.'• - 1 , �i...l - (5466) ,\ ,4 I_ ne .. - x .(..•) 9 7s ! M14.91 , of II z1 •JL. I. I ! I it 73.3 .. ) ).. ! ( ) ,.'-I - {52:0) 'l32 -- . (75 05 4.65 - 6. N. � 61 -I� - N i vV� -- _ 33 .. ! (71.§4)x �� a(1;72) • 73 75 67.3 .. 62:Sx 63.573.6 - .(76.0 x- I (76.15)%- I', (75b (7 0) (70. x �,.4.5 \ S4.75 °4.65 x(50.5) (44.8 (436: .. , I11 <��7. ,n x(62.7) l ( ) J j x(7,M1.55) - I 1 ( ) \_� '.. 93.0� ! ! _ - I `j: x 77.1 77.3! 77.05 76.9 I I !I _I.....).. 76.b _ .}9jF (7 05) _\-_ -_. 547 -__J g III j I ',i, i lr:,c Strce d..n,t). r.r,1S1? -- RETATINTNG __- -_77 -___ i s-FQE�07-T'-Lutes --�-- _ - I -_. _.. _._ 7F,.__ -_--- .. _ -.. ! , a754 ,.•"I-rM U C FIBER.OPTIC. L:nJES iT ____- _. _ _-_ - I ., JIF' J ❑E:ACt vF WALLHo_. _ __.r 1097.34 / (;., ( ' ..__.i,t}..•. a ,'_• Friel 5/8"Reber with - Is , Fnd.5/87-Retwr-��___.._ ----_ :...F___--.x Fnd'58"-Reber with with 1'1/4"YPC = ,, -�..gsi'1 / ).. 7Olvh[r %t-S h80 269'51'30'(M) - 1 1/2'Al...Cap(PT.L") \,RETPINING-WALL r t /4"_YYLC Mor ii -Maierle - - 8: J �- � I-,n� 'G',`,�.(-: [589'51'30"W OEXLTPF70S5MH 24`p -' I� RIM=6. -L.`.:I �� I `•g z � ZONED r-1 AREA TABULATION i AREA OF BUILDINGS: 81451.2 SO, FT. 1,871 ACRES AREA OF PAVED/CONCRETE SURFACES: 161029.72 SO, FT. 3.697 ACRES AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 92535.78 SQ. FT. 2.124 ACRES 1V TOTAL AREA: 335,017 SQ FT 7.6909 ACRES ELLIS STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARKING TABULATION FUTURE TO BE CONSTRUCTED TRACT C, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 1177C - REGULAR PARKING SPACES 316 R/'N t R;`:Y HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES 8 3O SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SECTION 8, T. 2 S., R. 6 E. VICINITY MAP - _•__ 1�' _ OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MON TANA - COMPACT PARKING SPACES 79 1' 1 ..5 6.5' .,, I 1• _ - TOTAL PARKING - 403 V�RADf � 27 SLOPE 3Y SLOPE I 31,SLOPE 2%SLOPE j p0E5 BENCHMARK `t 1,1T ,: � J --.__� AR/eS :SIDEWALK �...--- --- SIDEWALK VPQ\E S LEGEND 3"BITUMINOUS SURFACE TOP OF NORTH STORM DRAIN I w •'{ -'* STRIP TOPSOIL TO SUB-GRADE ELEVATION ELEVATION = 4857.60 FEET �. COMPACTED TO 97%.MARSHALL - ,-:11� H OUTSDE OF EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD SURFACE. (CITY OF BOZEMAN DATUM) _ cr- ,. ® PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 6"OF 1 1/2"MINUS CRUSHED - N01ES: Scale In Feet s 8 J%\� - BASE COARSE COMPACTED 40 D 40 _ t '' � �' --- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE 1. INTEGRAL CURB AND GUTTER AS PER C.O.B. SPEC. 02528 ,I TO 957 OF AASHTO T-93 AND C.O.B.STD.DWG. #02528-1, OWNER - " +� S/TE L PROPOSED WATER LINE - - 2. SIDEWALK AS PER C.O.B. STD.DWG. 02529-10 AND 2529. 12 0 12 a : a '" ;^b INSTALL 9. OF 6"MINUS PIT RUN MATERIAL ON N #0 ( - Scale In Meters PROPOSED HYDRANT COMPACTED SUBGRADE(INSTALL GEOTEXTILE 3. FERTILIZING AND SEEDING AS PER C.O.B.SPEC.02223. rill ii J - CAMPBELL/LUCIN, L.L.C. • G� � - AS RE0'D BY ENGINEER) (TOPSOILING&SEEDING ON CUT&FILL AREAS ON 3499 BRIDGER CANYON ROAD - j�'r J I,r �� f, "° x(75.0) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPERTY SIDE OF SIDEWALK) Contour Interval: f Foot BOZEMAN, MT 59715 n� e 11 .1�J1 ,:.� a l.. r J "' % - - 4. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WILL BE USED DEPENDING ON SITE CONDITIONS / 1��� �",y 'VU+- DRAINAGE DIRECTION AS REO'D BY ENGINEER(LIGHTWEIGHT NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE _ T q FABRIC CONTECH C-45) ARCHITECT lIf y ; I ( ,- © PROPOSED STORM DRAIN -__-�TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS F'i,�1f�'111,�i'�•Rjj1r(r'�� BAYLISS ARCHITECTS, P.C. , o NP SIGN NO PARKING ANYTIME' SIGN C2' PIGISUR ERRINTVG, INC. 212 S. TRACY AVENUE- n 1 N PER C.O.B. STD. DWG. N0. 09810-1 C1 SCALE' TUTS .c.;1 carmKrrar•stera=mr,r Eaaf-riac•Tina 5,r w BOZEMAN, MT 59715 _ NOT TO SCALE o STOP STOP SIGN 2415 nest Main Street,Suite I Bozeman,Montana 09718 - - (405)567-1115•Pax:(408)557-9768•NCI aineerin?lbe<obal.net DATE PREPARED: 12/15/00 - - #00220 : L.' -.II'.- .,.,,_�I,. � -i-.!.ry ey—'n0y°.a.,II.-- ti'x.�-.�I.-�"Q-S-�-O-.-- '-�p6-5-�,-,g;''-`-. -- ,-'1'I.—• ..—,.. ..-,-----I ---.:—�I----1III- Ey.a''."r QJt d00fi aeso � - a� - ". . Ii� � �I• ass afi T_- _. ._-.._ ' I I 0.543R I _ —_T _ I._ ..�. _OPOSED GRADE. I I -- -- fbs Nc •� I I. A I f• I I I I I 4g50 j `4850 e J I I 0^ I i too V.C. I Q I I I i ! I 7- 4840 QS I + II _ _ I h . l ,` I 16 ti i •' 00'V.C. i I I i I j i48M . : t : aoo'V.C. � I I I I I I I I I •' I j 1 I A a a820 - - +820 ^ �� i._ I o t00'V.C. b pO^O 4810-------------- 8� s R i I 50'm 917T .I: ',. i • i,'. ,.,! I ..I - i`' I i I, 20 tLEAt, I ep I , j i FIT I EA P F : B i. I a. H� ��.` %EISrG�roAVE%s . E , aaao. -r � {- -- ...�, .-I-.__,_. .I-_-.. __I � I ., ._ _.. i__ ._.._ -._ "..i_ _..- _.. _. ... ,__I_.. L.- _-.. _. 5 LF OF B'SDR-35 PVC 55 a9 5.96% :..a, ego; 1 I ..�. {' .. I -" I •, 70 LF OF 8• I'.I ExrsnNG 60N CSP CUL 4ERl J L _OR-35 PVC'SS®59JRi 1 18'LO O FErS FL>25t EACH 3/D, „ BORE 8 DIAL HOLE THROUGH 51DE OF MH AND SHAPE NEW CHANNELTHROUGH . r. MH SHELF TO 71E JNTD MAIN CHANNEL I' ! v5 cd Hf, _ I � 142 LF OF 8 °DR-35 PVC SS®4.13R , of �i � �: ill � �+ �, �I � � �� �. �, I I r I : 0,09 I+Do - 2+00 a+oo a+Do s+oD - s+ao 7+(w a+oo s+oo 1n+(w n+oo ���--- 12+66� �- �� -iz+bti� 1�+bo� -ie+oii- �� 16+00�- � iT+(io - � ��-ie+oa - �19+00 - 20+00 (2)SEWER MAIN EXTENSION/STREET PROFILE „ Ct SCALE: (1•=60'HORIZONTAL AND1"=6'VERTICAL). b • �� I y! _ Woe gg . ree IIX RAv•M TO MITI6aMTMi 4T Nl0 WI:1FE PARCEL 1 ,tp'arn.OeP IPT'x1 ra Evsrzx x.uxs Ar maszcal wu,rxwts " g-_ e-!; ^•` "� .. '� \ COS I.J. - EF� tur6RE ca+ceErE alre a WMR ZONED 6P i .uc ,,,,�.....,:: H,o-6/a'-N•va.lw' } .__. - ASv cWt� t3. .. _y_.__-- Y--aed i - ^ t. �'f \I I11 I \. sDEwux(xor A PARr a nos PRaEeO UNOEVELOPEO xmalxi P _ rM'=eLe" (o .,.-, ,., q--.� L, `•, III \ ,\ �\\ PARCEL:^' ee sR W^' a 51Y ( � (Pr c9 .Y,..•<-e"t'ne I � ��J j — _ i\• `$S )"':. ^I d ZONED UP9rW .r • _____.-_ RNNL PE lYr. " i �S✓w /: ,.'9NDF.VELUF'EG �' ,,,_,r-' _"�-- ,i.-. .�..., ). - ioN�'e - -.____._-_._.._-- ___' tt• ql Q >_f I I .� .� NEW 7 P.nlmaon ..e Aw ' ;:F flo:EM_,NZMEAn011 CCIAPLEX,:.' i. Pbt el DRIAI tUlxdl AOnnpi �• V - ,• .. -- '. _ - - � .,R n E, gP IAy -- " ZGNEO_P(A. I „µc(um,:„-wl.A$/. ..•-_""� - -._.--' ,:.'-;.i, s) :::..-: :� _- _ r V -- i'. 'L�i t S I - a.�cr �� ii - . ,.rlmnx0 ssM-z3 I �,J,.,.._....r _ _-.._ .,r :Sv'•^-'"- -- r (s3. /. - r 1 e'1;•... _ A° \\ µ L r -- _...-- .......r w -- s•' II mI eaza(,,-s u.:�. o_Pie-_..:_-=.__.' ej-.-.-(_.x.-):-.-�_"t-- _-r:'-�_.; __,___+_.tl-1.lr~:.mI:.R�,.N�.'.-¢-;-..."�lC1+3lAf.^:rA.t:+r>.,.-.'(�_/:....-`'.,,+.�a�.sf.l�.S a.-wp.5i31 a.,fc1...'.-,- n.y�_.I�.�•."_...,:=._`-`.�. �',.,..:._.""._.".•{''J•�u��_=-.d_...tiv.�w,_W...,R_-(Na.-..Yt h_..',�: -y r-,-ya._.]:.�'R. FL- "!�S-n•-t_o-va�'o J fL__.--__Y�_ (a»3_(baCB) eu0.Lv]SOTaae WWeS 4O,d,w:F.T I .Ra¢:..Wa_•—tf_a4_aV;dt.... II 8t\..,H�.1z.:s lzQ• IIIL_�.M.LO..OZ•-IYeTs.I_e1 YlWt o•i_a,JT,.jI ., ^� IT o o sro N oxaN IR ]OEi (<tt OF eOZEAN D ) /4_ n1 5.0 rEar LOT 3 'Fs SP_r a,y c .S iZ rill, I I t;.. �,�_ x U/(� Fed��P� G _.,_.115 �'-... ..f_�... �" ��eZe• � :-M..� .. �6a1). (eb3�-�.. 6'dP W _ - I�a16 ea.1. _ _-- ~•.a, � ( u) a I ( I� I� I'I � 4.kn� ` � n: eP�,i yF I riFegl„i/e•R•GVC.IM Irl S' �•- �31 �/"-' (m. •:I I,( ...t. :.. IHtafx (eeoa)ar ._ 4a7.c)�asm) - - so C,;' , NsaF!- -__ ___ \ _—_ _ xiw -e I: uis�� il.a0 ___�"�y Y _ I. I T `me Nonxm-ralM.)':I t?i~. (eoas ,I I 1 Ifli I.; I ee: I -- .° Anp _ :.� (o6z)(ma 61d)(W,), ).(so.n1 (41 hsg� (4 -,". a y -_ __L__. (mz (.ah � -- -�`- - - oa,s -- __ (saes)T r'J✓ aN. ]:.I ! xpt`413 EN, .m>s1 si S •7� ]• i.a ' - G_ I "' � ` >.:. _.,' ,• .."f , )_. .._ - /,..p: -� �.tir '. 1 fs I 1 1 e le I _ -- \I . 4.hao��d8.',I.(I1 II'1 I,t 1 I'6.IId.J>I�I I 1uIi-�I,1:....�..W.P.�-Y-6,_;II..I I...,p�`,'bC.}g'y 7,yl'i{I1I,•'l Ii,1nIk lll ItIt'1IlN+1 I:.I\...G.•�JG']..J..r,.,J.'l..�..''.!IIlI'1��I't_.\O�c A-.:,�a7",•0,..1(..„.<,.iw�,c.INlI.\r'.'1,.•,.,3g;,,,i l,I�.,-,�.,I,}"I!!'i y5�t"„�au"_pps...., __-__...__:"(asa3((a]al tsE)s.o)s.'L"��_..-:..._,.-__.-_.r�I.._.--.�__.._J e__J_9....i`'a('l°°+o'asa'»),m�.'I��I.-.__.:.__"�_-1_-�-_.'._".,,.f(1III/'-/J i�!_..:�i. /-/':: ,,/a sn/re:e': :/:',''�::,I1II. •:_(7--7aun__s_)_e/"L-.n%(t.>,_..,)D_i._..1L!1,.-.1;)_3_f_1-.J._-.1I�...".-Ii.-�i.--_;!1"l..e..)-,._...i..a.__1r7r f..__-(-7aIvs-I). -.f- --- J:...;d : __,�j.I =�L."(ai��„''z-3 i`}.�.`:'j�(ns) I`r:r\.�-a\,f_mv:sOe.o\N r a�mo.,,Il1I -.CI�,•a-_°e-))\'.)1. - IIIs b,,,')re�,`_-'I.1-lTi-'t.o,taje A}s ,II ) `--u•s o)+ - yI, j Scale In FeetSPCE LOT 7 La Bu 60 0 602ACT_G 27 xq, o$ aoo 333-m75 LOT., 4a J..z6voo-A J2x t 18 0 18 LO �tlqq 0�/^ � vI ,, Z..at Scale In Meters L'y D R-2 Contour Interval 1 Foot i+ (7m) -Oa 32 00 2 20®\ 7/Z` 73 3T� \ ' AND z" —' 4' ENGINEERING1 a I . _ . -- . a e ss _� \ STRTEI7VGo INC.: 7V.s 1 I i I .j ., Y i Po- , \ Ra7ay o.Mul._,._... ___ -. __ ___ } -._._ •Cbit Enelneerene•Stroet,usl Ehgma rins•4od S—yiae rm e/d vsa -�.c ._�"� .ma]re e<ev.„u .-",".I .. `':..-„-- tcaa via Fx�vP,c uNts r,,... , r e O r`6e>.Im - 2aI5 West Main Street,Suite l Bozeman•Montana 59718 •; I ; .0,1/4 rrc... '\yy r:�'. S ' ,, i - 7 a `z3o 232a1.3D•M) _ ,I/a'u.e:ew(Pr•L•) 108 587-1115•Par(406 587-9758•cmf,engintenn;'alAc,166a1 nP.!. ... -S_ ) r ! t.r.._: C _C tSa9'3,'30•Wi E.�a. 1 1 l , mo J Qm UZ W VIS ` �w= J a0�R'QmZ U V as 5/13/ 3 J r CHRISTOPHER --—----- �A M.WASIA w: 10959 PE UTILITY777, �I coNDulr T_ . - 1iE-° TYPICAL ASPHALT SECTION SCALE: NTS EXTEND CUNC -- / APRON TC NEW (79.5' RAG. -... - ASPHALT CURB/GUTIER -- am ��- _ TBC), __ .--"_i ----^'��__„ -_ RAISE'IINLEF-- __ L / I ADD--STORM DRAIN_... - _ ��1.4T \\, ry hTCH - _ l- -- DO pO0O00000808080000080808 o - ' , _ c\ - I'7W ¢RAGE ---- - BASE 6 _ •�.�_"�-- '"HDPE.PIPE_(IE_49.60YI 1 /� ' - \� \\ y _ RAISE-RETAINING POND ✓ 1�-� -r._ - - CRUSHED CRAVE /1 0 o O OO o000o0o0000000000' O O O O O O O O O O O O O 52 5_��� - .. - -- CON5TftUC,T' -t1 D' ;�-j� 1S,_NG-ST SUB-BAS COURSE ' ---" I v - WALL 2 0' AND ADD -- r - RM SEWER I \ \ \ B� TBC: 1 1,i iL - HAND RAIL-FOR-ENTIRE "`2 JHOCES�fO WALL i 9 - ---" -WIDN ENTRANCE -,..52.8 --- �- -- LETNGTA SEE-DETAIL -,.. /' � 4.0 FEET, POUR 1 1'. y�..�---- _-.--- -- - 8 i'/ + NEW SIDEWALK, 1 RELOCATE EXISTING •ice"- - " CURB & GUTTER - _ ` % ' .,, _. __ � - COMPACTED SUBGRADE LIGHTPOLE AND � - � / UTILITY BOX AS �- O , / `A _. to _ 1 Wg NEEDED. (9.5'TTBC STA-0.05 I _ i /j'/ .SAWCU7 LIMIT, -.I _._ �.`� / 2 ADD STORM DRAIN '--- - - :1 !I f�Tl INLET AND 12' SAWfUT LIMITS - `� - (2.5 TBC�i I - -- ----- ---- ,� U a E HDPE PIPE OE: 50.0) (TYP) c�� /�', R" �, - RAD.), j OPTIONAL `I - Z m3 REMOVE AND -. w/ I INLET I O w x ' REPLaC cuRe;& YPICAL STORM DRAIN INLET 2 •, V/ - .L... N75 TBC ELEVATION Gi o"�- o "LIMITS OF� /i`';''�\.. O _ -. .. NEENAH R-3067 OR FjE-CONSTRUCTION, IFCO 515-7 / j/ FRAME & GRATE ►�-1 p 3 M AI (SEE PLANS) rG-s S 6 EXISTING 3" OF ADJUSTMENT nOn $ UTILITY CONDUITS- UTILITY J 1 - Cf-;U1 -� �-RINGS ❑I 'L� (TYP.) \ `. CONDUITS UIUI \\ TOP OF BOX 1 _ ^_ --- -- BOX DEPTH; z { I � w m c . O� _. INVERT I 9 m o m d ELEVATION-SEE PLANS (IE) 9 d •• o 2'X3' SQUARE OR ROUND o EQUIV. STORM DRAIN a C> o zo E ir ii F 0 !I MMI BENCHMARK! 73.02 0 m o0 C&H DATUM -4'=APPROX. M.M DATUM - i_-- 'I -_ _ - Y o 11 _-,- --11IL MMI BENCHMARK=TBC NEAR CAMPBELL BUILDING ENTRANCE: 4873.02 rn en GENERAL NOTES (TYP ALL SHEETS) O o 1. ALL SIDEWALKS TO HAVE 2.0% CROSS SLOPE FOR CIOLEGEND. . DRAINAGE. o_ j'T5o �90DIFICNTION 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING TO BE PROVIDEDBY LICENSED ENG 'Ya o --�— PROPOSED FINISH CONTOUR ELEVATIONS SUB ALL TO/SURVEYOR. VERIFICATION.V� es plans Of the and/o eelevationsh E E 3. ALL CURB STRINGLINES AND FORMS TO BE FIELD - Withou 't -rlr \ r-,.♦• n ia0l7(O\�nl w S 5.5% PROPOSED SLOPES VERIFIED BY LICENSED ENGINEER. from L118 ri+µIT II z4. ALL NEW RETAINING WALLS, INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS TOEXISTING a PROFESSIONALSENGNEER.SHALL ESEESSHEET IGNED p 3 LICENSED 'I w PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER `1�1 n 2 N o PURPOSE: TO REDUCE CROSS-SLOPE OF FLAN D E C E I D m 0 '"tUUJ. EXISTING CONTOURS ENTRANCE NORTH OF ISLAND WHILE - k �I D j - PROVIDING ACCESS TO UPPER LOT. THIS - a Ll MAY 15 2003 GRAPHIC SCALE PROJECT NO. OPTION ALSO ELLIMINATES ACCESS TO REJ,�V6._D&A.PROVED. o ._...__ ELLIS STREET. - - PT, F PLANNING - a67z.00l -" EXISTING SLOPES AND C Mr`i 'NITY DEVE E T i D'PARTh VI C lA tIHG ( I1 FEET) SHEEf NUMBER (17X17": 1° = 40') DRAWING NUMBER * SEE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DISCUSSION & SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR ® ® ® LIMITS OF RE—CONSTRUCTION DATE EXISTING GRADES & CONTOURS - <Z�• 3 CONTOUR INTERVAL 0.20 FT P-1 0 0 00 ® 0 0 ELLIS ST IING SID. mm w� V CONS RUCT_NEW o �`r _ SIDEWALK _ _ 1' '. ..\ - 3 o w REMOVE"5101`WALK - _ - _ •,1 _. / iEw 0 ,.,.'�`�.. l ,1 _� �• , _ 1 ' TO ELLIS STR_EE_T :.1 _ , •. , , ROMELLI SISDT \ \ �-TIE'INT6.EXISTING FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION 11 =_�bA��b1jr -:T S RE \1 \�- 15" STORM SEWER- R 0 ELEV 10 ..I.- .- '�i FUTURE -OF PROPOSED BLDG - - I 4' DIA REMOVE AND �� CHRISTOPHER RELOCATE STORM BUILDING SHALL BE ADJUSTED. M.WASIA w$ MANHOLE-C.O.B. S ANDARD SUGGESTED FF ELEV: 62.0 �� - DRAIN INLET TO EAST �`- (MM DATUM) - �'. 62.0 �r�rq�ONAL .';C�..- °' kIST t7777) / rn - l i i i /'`• 'k .S,.STORM \ •\ '�S _ --- 62.2 1', i �s 62.0- 61.40 Q-P� � RELOCAT D j.. _... .:�1 __1_ -STORM DRAIN 6 �. / � `• .� ,. '.. 1. - �_.. REMOVE LI OLE, CURB .._ ... �61 � \`.� - i,!� �9 ADD ST16RM D I �� & GUTTER AND J INLET 1 E Z I PARKING STALLS " I I TILITY , ( A ST LIG - ---_� __ " z tiC w A I / Cb DUITS 1 S.a a. '�POLE::45- + C;� ADD 114 LF 12"..HDPE 11 `\\ _ -__- .----- - s LLI I // I (TYP) \, S�,• <� _ NEEDED ++' PIPE D STORM INLET i - - -- _-, - -- - I .L._1-_ ..,,!, •�, A 17eEXTEN�STON 3_._ .. .....-yy-2 ...,/,. ---- " =-- _ '..,ADD STORM._DRAI N_ TO ISTING HYDRANT -_ + t t..._. N .. INLET-AND 50 LF --. i<o o ¢c� I I 119 QSC _ AND ,�.V.BOX - ._ ,H o \ - UTILITY ^ , _ !J T 12'HDPE PIPE v� 1T .611 i I N_ U CONDUITS w 1 (TYP)� ADJUST T ...�-! \ -:w- -- 63 :-__ to --.1 TBC 62 35- - - w OPTIONAL STORM _ - _ v, -•"•� __ DO CURB CUT & _.. _ . ... .. -POLE LOCATI UTILI - +� r DRAIN INLET I O ELEY/tiiON. -,>�. ONDUITS `" _.S EWALK.PAN FOR - 't -.._TBC: i a. --'i� ,(. - -. ---. .. TYP) DR AGE SEE- - ___.- - 1 r 3 { I fJ V I ..'_:� - CURB CUTS �* RETUN 1 I I 6 h __._..._ -1\ l'BC• 63.20 I _.�/-� \ ! � & .. 1 Yp PER ARCHITECT'S \; WALL' ! - PLAN : I I D ---r.;..- _u_. Y !a; _ FAX 5/3/03 ,.\ •\ i.l �T �' i _ Si,o - - _ - 63 �.iI I -...y A ST IGH rn 7. rl` _! ..._lo-4 65.60 �5 WALK _. .. ice V .\.�ra �� - _. ._.... i REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTINGi. I SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER; '- LE EL TIO a1 - �_", 1 --� '�� TBC: 64.30 ---- _ TOP ALK: \\ \ - `\ - e�} - 1-- -- 67.0 •lTBC 4.30 TBC: 6 0 \ -.._- rt - ! 1 ._ T �\'•;1 --U?'. NOTE:-EXISTING ASPHALT Y�`. '` � EH - - - I 6.75 „\y \° SLOPE BEYOND MMI'S - g I ' _ :I 6 \\ 64 INDUSTRY STANDARDS C O = ` o _ Y �--I --- y;r>"- 6 uo F.F. ELEVATION: \ \0�... -J I cn wc� I 64.53 (MM DATUM) STORM DRAIN CHASE ADJUST EXISTING 1 - - I. �;�_-� - SEE DETAIL: 1 G = LIGHT PEDESTALS I rn R. VE & REPLACE - �'- :n -�- b`. �, \� � 65 EXI _.G ASP-HALT. - MAINTAIN 1.6% SLOPE is 1 a 3� g- STORM DRAIN CHASE AWAY FROM ENTRANCE --_- -N n ' m w:.l SEE DETAIL: TO TOP BACK CURB -I� \��� . �� ss',. \ 0 -. m a� LOT 2 *_ \ o ga J - STORM DRAIN C ASE \ \`PLill AADD STAIRSND RETAINING 74.90 MM DATUM) 74.90 SEE DETAIL: I \�.S \S, G�� _ . .. - I rn _ 69.0 j i a F.F. ELEVATION c� I t. 1 WALL. DETAIL TO BE 74.0 1 os 7 z 'i BUILDI�G u \ �1 DETERMINED BY - ----- -_- 73.0- 201 SIDE AT 3 7% -y - ENTRANCE \ "_; TBC: 1 ARCHITECT _ 3 s \ 71.ao L 7a 9 \ m I -I ---------- _ \ / �,'; .._ p,K _ -- C RB CUT TBC: 71.40 Ir_ L __ \ c� -- - 8.0 s�os.°•/. _.. ,,TBC: 74.E0 /..:..73 .0 3s'RAD. S- 3.47 TBC 66.40 P ARCHITECTS (Typ) MMI BENCHMARKI73.02 - \ \ / I E CURB CUT TBC` 74.90 f TBC: 74:9 .-TBC- 71.29 - 72 - FAX 5/3/03.,, z \ H --� s� _.. __ I ` S 1.6% J S= 3.0° 1°( \\ \ O -ems S= 2.6% 7 S= 3.4% ,(, \. I 1 r L:-- - `.-. --- L In I I pI 74 TBC: 75.00 73.00 , n E L " 'I V I .. -- TBC: 73.60 - - I o TBC: 75.20 c TBC: 75.20 TIE INTO EXISTING CURB/GUTTER TBC: 70.0 •� - O rn _ o o _ to U m MMI BENCHMARK-TBC NEAR CAMPBELL BUILDING ENTRANCE: 4873.02 Z O LEGEND: .._.' GENERAL NOTES A �_ d w - ,. ........ ..... :.:.:.: ...... .... \ - 1. ALL SIDEWALKS TO HAVE 2.0% CROSS SLOPE FOR Q rn DRAINAGE. - i 69 PROPOSED FINISH CONTOUR 12. BYLLCENSED ENIGNEER/SURVEYORON STAKING TO E ALL OSURVEY w Er __. ...-..._.�,_. j ELEVATIONS SUBJECT TO FIELD VERIFICATION. ` o ; S= 5.5� PROPOSED SLOPES 3. ALL CURB STRINGLINES TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY t ENGINEER. i J I ` STORM DRAINAGE CHASE Z r- I 14 ALL NEW RETAINING WALLS, INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING I PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER i WALLS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. I I'EI ".k bolt RY0 I/ ml__plot..t..l Q SEE SHEET P-3 e I 'n' a s•°a z a I -_ EXISTING CONTOURS PURPOSE: TO REDUCE GRADE OF �p f0 PARKING & SIDEWALK WHILE PROVIDING m / - v.•sum w•w,e.°nue sm -------t. POSITIVE DRAINAGE. j = S` �� EXISTING SLOPES 7,-- c- # I GRAPHIC SCALE PROJECT NO. 3672.001 I (IN FEET) SHEET NUMBER PROPOSED RETAINING WALL11°ti= Z° It e SECTION A - n I SECTION H (11x17": 1"=40') DRAWING NUMBER EXISTING CONTOUR-INTERVAL 0.20 FT LIM,ITS_. OF RE-_QONSTRLJCTIO_N ';, / , \ STORM DRAIN CHASE FOR SIDEWALK P_2 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., � a�-.,'. �.,,. t :�,.: _;; Y p I �` III � � I �. � � .. i GAb'.'L':aWl' ' CITY PLANNING i Northern Rockies Professional Center 1 1 1 Prepared for: Campbell/Lusin, L.L.C. ' Bozeman, Montana Prepared By: ' C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 2415 West Main Street, Suite 1 1 Bozeman, MT 59718 Bayliss Architects 212 South Tracy Avenue 1 Bozeman, MT 59715 1 December 2000 1 Project 00220 P-0047 Northern Rockies Prof. MaSub PUD Prel. Plat Center Ellis Street Campbell/Lusin, LLC December 19 , 2000 T-0-0171 Northern Rockies -- --J Toning PUD Prof. Center Ellis Street 1 Campbell/Lusin, LLC December 19 , 2000 1 C & H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. 2415 West Main Street,Suite 1 • Bozeman,Montana 59718 Phone(406)587-1115 Fax(406)587-9768 E-Mail:c&hengineering@theglobal.net December 15, 2000 i City of Bozeman Planning and Community Development ' Attn: Jami Morris P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 ' RE: Northern Rockies Professional Center P.U.D. Subdivision(00220) Dear Jami, Enclosed are two checks in the amount of$1116.90 and$221.00,a P.U.D.Preliminary Plan Application, and a Preliminary Plat Application. The Traffic Report was prepared by Marvin&Associates, and the Statement of Planning Objectives (Section E) was prepared by Bayliss Architects. The following response letter is provided as supplemental information to both applications. 1 Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan 1. Document Requirements: A. A completed application form is included with this submittal B. Developer: Campbell/Lusin, L.L.C., Members: Gary Lusin and John Campbell C. Le al Description: Tract C Certificate of Survey No. 1177C located in the Southeast Quarter of g p Y the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 6 East of P.M.M.. D. A list of adjacent property owners is included with this submittal. IE. See attached information from Bayliss Architects. F. Construction will begin as soon as plan approval has been received,and is tentatively scheduled for the spring of 2001. No phasing is planned for this development. G. Reduced versions of the plans are included with this submittal. 1 2. Site Plan Requirements: All items listed are included on the site plan, landscape plan and the supplemental vicinity map. 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements: A. Architectural elevations are included with this submittal. ilv C.i Structural Ens*incerino and Surveviro, / b b b .. II ICI B. Landscape plans are included with this submittal. ' C. Utility plans are included with the site plan. D. Ellis Street cross sections are included with this submittal. E. Four test holes were drilled on July 13, 2000. A black topsoil with few organics was found from ' zero to six inches below grade. An abundant root zone was found to a depth of 12 inches. A silt loam exhibiting medium to moderate density and medium plasticity was found between four and 12 inches below grade. A brown sandy loam exhibiting moderate density, and medium plasticity was ' encountered from a depth of one to 12 feet. No evidence of groundwater was encountered in any of the test holes. Soils information obtained from the NRCS indicates the site consists mainly of a Blackmore soil type. This soil type offers few limitations to construction assuming groundwater is not a problem. ' Well logs in the area indicate a static water level of approximately 42 feet. It is safe to assume that the seasonal high is no closer than 20 feet from the ground surface. The nearest body of water is ' Placer Creek located approximately 325 feet from the east property line of the site. The creek lies approximately 45 vertical feet below the lowest point on site. The site is located outside of the 500 year floodplain. A copy of the floodplain map is included with this submittal. F. Drainage plans are included on the site plan. Preliminary drainage calculations for the detention structures are also included with this submittal ' G. No temporary facilities will be required. H. The preliminary subdivision plat is being submitted concurrently with this plan. I. A traffic impact analysis was prepared by Marvin and Associates. The report is included ' with this submittal. J. A complete Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement is included with this ' submittal. ' 4. Reproducible Copies One set of mylars and 8.5" x I clear film reductions are included with this submittal. Preliminary Plat A. 25 copies of the preliminary plat are included with all items listed shown on the plat. B. Supplemental Information: ' 1. One copy of the full Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement is included with this submittal I 1 2. A map of the entire subdivision on an 11" x 17" sheet is enclosed. 3. No variances are being requested 4. A certified list of adjoining property owner,their mailing addresses and property descriptions is enclosed. ' 5. Three sets of self-adhesive mailing labels with the names and addresses of the Adjoiners are included. 1 6a. Covenants, Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners Association are included. 1 6b. Encroachment permits 6c. No zoning changes will be required. ' N d. other 6 0 of e certificates are required. ' 6e. Provisions for maintenance of all roads,parks,and other required improvements are included in the covenants. 6f. No improvements agreement and guarantee is required. ' 7. A profile sheet for Ellis Street is included. 8. A noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District is enclosed. 9. Fire protection requirements of Chapter 16.14.060 will be met by paying a fire impact fee in ' accordance with the Fire Impact Fee regulation. 10. A Preliminary Platting Certificate prepared by a Montana Title Company is included with this submittal. ' If you have any questions or comments please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, 1 Matt Cotterman, E.I. Enc. ' G:\c&h\00\00220\office\pudplansub.wpd . i bayfiss a, ' 1. The immediate area around and including this site is agricultural land, which is, zoned R- O. There are no adjacent neighborhoods around to draw architectural designs ideas for this project. There are two large buildings, which are visually noticeable, and the ' architectural interest is lacking from one. These buildings have been completed at different times and the styles vary, however, their overall mass will allow for our development to blend into the area without increasing the visual impact. Our buildings ' will be smaller in square footage and height. The "neighborhood" identity will continue as planned by the present zoning regulations since this development is trying to cluster the buildings and providing a clear pedestrian network for all buildings. This ' development has also provided a neighborhood feeling for the main road by placing a tree lined median to help lesson the vehicular impact in the center. The new landscaping plan will have similar species of shrubs as well as larger trees as well as a meandering berm in ' the front yard to further separate the buildings from Ellis Road. This will improve the existing hillside and breakdown the vertical scale of the buildings in relationship to the pedestrian as well as focusing the buildings to the main internal street. There is no historic character to draw from on the present site. The orientation and placement of all buildings has been approached with the idea of working with the major contours and ' minimizing the amounts of cut into the existing grades. 2. Yes, please see the engineering documents. 3. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. ' 4. No, this does not apply to this site. 5. Project is not located within a historic district. 6. Yes, this has been addressed in the Architectural Guidelines. ' 7. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. 8. Yes, please see the preliminary site plan. 9. Yes,please-see the preliminary site plan. ' 10. Yes, the model energy code must be used in the design of each structure. 11. Not applicable, there are no residents adjacent to this project. 12. Open space, the area has been calculated and at least 30% of the project has been left as ' open space. We have also included picnic tables and small parks in the center of the project for the enjoyment of the people utilizing this center. 13. Not applicable. The park areas are not intended for active recreational usage rather more gathering and eating during business hours. 14. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. 15. No, at this present time there are no adjacent neighborhoods. 16. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. 17. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. Ellis Road is being improved and a sidewalk on our side shall be installed as well. ' 18. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. ay/issArchitects,P.C.,212 South Tracy Avenue,Bozeman,MT59715 406 586-5007 406 585-8337 baylissObaylissarchitects.com bavliss ' 19. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. This is a schematic plan and each building needs to be designed as the lots are sold. The Architectural Guidelines explain the landscape requirements. ' 20. The project is not located next to a public park or public open space. The areas located in this project are accessible at all times. ' Commercial PUD ' 1. Not applicable, this is a professional business center. 2. Yes, please see the engineering documents. 3. Yes, please see the engineering documents. Total project size is 7.7 acres. ' 4. Yes, see the Architectural Guidelines for the acceptable uses. 7. The immediate area around and including this site is agricultural land, which is, zoned R-O. There are no adjacent neighborhoods around to draw architectural ' designs ideas for this project. There are two large buildings,which are visually noticeable, and the architectural interest is lacking from one. These buildings ' have been completed at different times and the styles vary, however, their overall mass will allow for our development to blend into the area without increasing the visual impact. Our buildings will be smaller in square footage and height. The ' "neighborhood"identity will continue as planned by the present zoning regulations since this development is trying to cluster the buildings and providing a clear pedestrian network for all buildings. This development has also provided a neighborhood feeling for the main road by placing a tree lined median to help lesson the vehicular impact in the center. The new landscaping plan will have similar species of shrubs as well as larger trees as well as a meandering berm in ' the front yard to further separate the buildings from Ellis Road. This will improve the existing hillside and breakdown the vertical scale of the buildings in relationship to the pedestrian as well as focusing the buildings to the main ' internal street. There is no historic character to draw from on the present site. The orientation and placement of all buildings has been approached with the idea of working with the major contours and minimizing the amounts of cut into the existing grades. 8. No, no off street parking has been included in the parking counts for this project. 9. This project demonstrates compliance to the Bozeman master plan. ' 10. Yes, please see the preliminary landscape plan. It shows the areas in the center of the project and the picnic tables. Bayliss Architects,P.C.,212South Tracy Avenue,Bozeman,MT59715 406 586-5007 406 585-8337 baylissObaylissarchitects.con; ' CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING-20 EAST OLIVE STREET ' P. 0. BOX 1230,BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771-1230 (406)582-2360,FAX(406)582-2363 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Certain uses,while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District,may,under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain ' conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This review will also include a review for Certificate of Appropriateness,if applicable. Deviations and/or ' variances will be processed concurrently. Additional submittal materials apply. 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: Campbell/Lusin LLC ' 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman,MT 59715 Phone: 587-4501 ' 2. Name and mailing address of applicant/representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 2415 W. Main Street, Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 ' 3. Name and mailing address of Engineer/Architect/Planner: same as#2 Phone: ' 4. Name of project/development: Northern Rockies Professional Center ' 5. Address of proposed development: Ellis Street(no assigned address yet) 6. Legal Description: Tract C, COS 1177C, SE'/4, SW'/4, Section 8, T2S,R6E 7. Current Zoning R-0 Land Area: sq.ft. or 7.6909 acres 8. Describe the proposed development(use additional sheets if necessary): The proposed project is a Planned Unit Development with seven commercial lots which will include seven two-story buildings,primarily medical offices. 9. Review Fee: $660.00 (Minimum fee after refund: $400.00) This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and twenty (20) copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8'/z" x I V nor larger than 24"x 36", folded in ' individual sets no larger than 8%"x 14"in size. Application deadline varies. This application must be signed by both the applicant and property owner(if different)before the submittal will be accepted. I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our)knowledge. O tir�r�_ Applicant's Signature y Property Owner's Signature ' GAc&h\00\00220\office\CUP App.wpd r ' BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ' P. O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MT 59771 (406) 582-2360, FAX 582-2363 ' SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS The preliminary plat shall be legibly drawn at a horizontal scale no smaller than 100 feet to the inch, and may show approximate boundaries, dimensions, distances and areas, unless specifically noted. ' The plat shall be on one or more sheets of 18"x 24" or 24"x 36"paper. Where accurate information is required, surveying and engineering data shall be prepared under the supervision of a registered engineer or registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Montana, as their respective licensing ' laws allow. A completed"Subdivision Procedures Form"and Preliminary Platting Certificate must accompany this application.____________ - ------------------------------------------------------- 1. Name and address of property owner: Campbell/Lusin L.L.C. ' 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 587-4501 2. Name and address of applicant/representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying ' 2415 W. Main St., Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 ' 3. Name of Subdivision: Northern Rockies Subdivision 4. Location(legal): Tract C, COS 1177C, SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 8, T2S, R6E ' Common address: ' 5. Acres: Gross: 7.6909 Net: 1.8699 6. Total Number of Lots: 7 ' 7. School District: Bozeman Fire District: Fort Ellis ' 8. Date of Pre-Submittal or Pre-Application Review: August 22, 2000 9. Indicate the proposed use(s) and number of lots, spaces, or units for each use: Residential, single family ' Residential, multiple family ' MaSubPrelim. App. 9/97 7 Planned Unit Development Condominium ' Townhouse Recreation or Second Home ' Mobile Home Park Recreational Vehicle Park ' Commercial Industrial Other(please describe in narrative) ' 10. Current land use: C s The land is currently vacant ' 11. Existing zoning or other regulations: R-O 12. Review Fee: Major Subdivision: $200 plus$3 per lot to 100 lots,then$1 per lot for each lot in excess of 100 ' 13. A Preliminary Platting Certificate,prepared by a Montana Title Company, must accompany this application. Please refer to the Subdivision Procedures Form for the number of copies and supplemental information needed. The correct number of copies plus one copy of the completed Subdivision ' Procedures form must be submitted,with the appropriate fee,or the application will not be accepted. This application form must be signed by the applicant and the property owner(if different). Applicant's Signature PropertyOwner's Signature ' Date: Date: ' MaSubPrehm.App. 9/97 1 BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE SUBDIVISION PROCEDURES FORM PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS This-form-is used to evaluate and-accept-preliminary plat applications for major subdivisions. Failure to provide all applicable information will result in an incomplete submittal and will cause a delay in the review of the project. This form must be completely filled out and returned with the appropriate fee and application. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' NAME OF PROJECT: NORTHERN ROCKIES P.U.D. SUBDIVISION ' PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURES Subdivisions consisting of six or more parcels will be considered a Major Subdivision,and will be reviewed ' per Chapter 16.10 of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations. At least thirty(30)days prior to the next available Planning Board meeting,the following number of copies of the preliminary plat and supplemental information must be submitted: Within the City of Bozeman or the Zoning Jurisdictional Area --- 25 copies Within the Planning Jurisdiction,but outside the Zoning Jurisdiction -- 20 copies After a complete submittal is received, the application will be distributed to affected agencies for review. The Planning Board will conduct a public hearing on the application and will forward a recommendation to the appropriate governing body. For subdivisions within the City of Bozeman, or for subdivisions on land ' which has concurrently applied for annexation to the corporate limits of the City of Bozeman, the City Commission will consider the application and the Planning Board's recommendation during a regular public meeting of the Commission. Since the Planning Board is the designated agency to hold the public hearing on the subdivision,additional public comment can not be accepted by the City Commission at that meeting. For subdivisions located outside the corporate limits of the City of Bozeman, the Gallatin County Commission will consider the application and Planning Board recommendation during a public hearing before the County Commission. Additional comment will be accepted at this additional public hearing. The appropriate governing body shall approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the preliminary plat ' within 60 days of determination that the application is complete,unless a written extension is provided from the subdivider. Findings of Fact and Order will be prepared for the subdivision once the appropriate governing body makes a final decision on the subdivision. Preliminary plat approval is in force for not more than three calendar years or less than one calendar year. Extensions may be granted. If a final plat is not submitted within the allotted time,preliminary plat approval expires. ' PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The preliminary plat application for a major subdivision must contain all of the following information. The preliminary plat shall be legibly drawn at a horizontal scale no smaller than 100 feet to the inch, and may show approximate boundaries,dimensions,distances and areas,unless specifically noted. The plat shall be on one or more sheets of 18" x 24" or 24" x 36" paper. Where accurate information is required, surveying and engineering data shall be prepared under the supervision of a registered engineer or land surveyor, licensed in the State of Montana. Prelimprocedure.frm tMajor Sub. 9/97 A. The submittal shall include the following (refer to Chapter 16.08.030): YES NO N/A 1. All information required with the preapplication submittal X 2. Name and location of subdivision, scale, scale bar, north arrow, date of preparation, lots and blocks (designated by number), dimensions and area of each �! lot, and use of each lot, if other than single-family /\ l 3. Streets, roads, alleys, and easements,width of r/w, grades and curvature of each; existing and proposed road names; location of intersections with arterials or X collectors - ' 4. Names of adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining COSs X 5. Approximate survey of exterior boundaries with bearings, distances and curve data 6. Approximate location of all section corners or legal subdivisions corners of �( sections pertinent to the subdivision boundary 7. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope is under 10%; at 5-foot intervals if slope is between 10% and 15%; and at 10 feet if slope is 15% or greater 8. Phase lines includingdistinct lines of phased infrastructure improvements x P P 9. All appropriate certificates (refer to Chapter 16.32) X B. The supplemental information shall include the following: YES NO N/A 1. Environmental Assessment, Community Impact and Flood Hazard Evaluation \ per Chapters 16.18 and 16.20 2. Map of entire subdivision on either 8'/z"x l l"; 8%z"x 14"; or 11"x 17" sheet 3. Written statement describing requested variance(s) and facts of hardship upon X which the request is based(refer to Chapter 16.30) 4. A certified list of adjoining property owners, their mailing addresses and Y property descriptions, including property owners across public r/w and/or /\ �I easements. 5. Self-adhesive mailing labels; one list for first minor subdivisions and three sets of labels for all other subdivisions, of the names and addresses required in BA, above 6. Draft of the following documents and certificates, unless printed on the preliminary plat a) Covenants, Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners Association Prelimprocedure.fim Major Sub. 9/97 b) Encroachment permits or letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, roads, easements, r/w or driveways intersection State, County or City highways, streets or roads c) Letter of approval where a zoning change is necessary., d) Draft of other appropriate certificates e) Provision for maintenance of all roads,parks, and other required improvements f) Public improvements agreement and guarantee 7. Profile sheets for street or road grades greater than 5% 8. Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed y Control District effective upon preliminary plat approval and during construction of improvements. 9. Written explanation of how the fire protection requirements of Chapter 16.14.060 will be met 10. Preliminary Platting Certificate,prepared by a Montana Title Company i Prelimpr.ocedure.frm Major Sub. 9/97 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MT 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX (406) 582-2363 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant N rp be t I- Lus i-n . L.L.C,• Date: 12-1 U Residential PUD Project (Jok+here RcxKi es Probe ss ma l Cen-tei2 Commercial PUD _ The following is a checklist of submittal requirements for all Planned Unit Development(PUD)Preliminary Plans. The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items listed for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked"NO"or"N/A"(not applicable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Upon submittal, staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB) agendas, followed by a City Planning Board review. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. 1. Document Requirements YES NO N/A The following information shall be presented in an 8`/z"x 11" vertically bound document. The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: A. Application forms; B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the — — PUD, C. Legal description of the site; D. Adjacent property owners: (1) A copy of the list of the names and addresses of record of real property within 400' of the property lines of the parcel of land ' for which the PUD is proposed, exclusive of public r/w; (2) The original list shall be included in the document; _ (3) Names and addresses shall be included on plain(no return address), — #10 (4-1/8" x 9-1/2"), stamped envelopes; E. A statement of planning objectives, including: (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman Area Master Plan; _ PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 1 (2) Statement of proposed ownership of public and private open space areas and applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all or portions of the PUD; ✓ (3) Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial, and ✓ industrial uses; _ (4) Description of rational behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant; _ (5) The applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable Community Design objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100,documentation pursuant to these regulations for each proposed use;the applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not I�. address the objective or criterion; the Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that section; any variance from the criterion shall be described; (6) Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or`mitigated; (7) Statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g. -home/business,utilities, transportation fuel, waste recycling); _ F. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the PUD, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8%2".x 11" or 11" x 17" size. _ 2. Site Plan Requirements YES NO N/A A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale not greater than 1" = 40' or less than 1" = 100% and composed of one(1)or more sheets not lager than 24'x 36", showing the following information: B. Name of project/development; C. Location of project/development by street address; . ✓ _ _ D. Location map; including area within one(1)'mile of site; Z_ E. Name and mailing address of developer/owner; ✓ F. Name and mailing address of engineer/architect; G. Date of plan preparation; ✓ _ G. North point indicator; ✓ _ H. Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; _✓ I. Listing of specific land uses being proposed; ✓ J. Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; ✓ _ K. Total number, type, and density per type of dwelling units; L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel; _ _ M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (Floor Area Ratio, FAR),with a breakdown by land use; _✓ N. Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel(s) and total site, including the following: PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 2 1 -� (1) Percentage and square footage of building coverage; — — (2) Percentage and square footage of driveway and parking; _ — (3) Percentage and square footage of public street r/w; — _ — (4) Percentage and square footage of open space and/or landscaped area; ✓ _ — (5) Percentage and square footage of"active recreational use" area; ✓ _ — O.. Number and location of off-street parking, including guest,handicapped, bicycle and motorcycle parking, with typical dimensions of each; P. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals,unless different) permitted YP J by the Planning Director; Watercourses water bodies and irrigation ditches; R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; J S. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover, including existing trees and shrubs, having a diameter greater than 2%2", by species; T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed buildings; _ ,L U. Boundary and square footage of each area designated as active ✓ recreational use; — — — V. Location and acreage of common open areas and all public and semi-public land uses, including public parks,recreational areas, school sites, and — similar uses; W. Location of existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; — — X. Maximum building height of all structures; ✓ _ — Y. The existing and proposed circulation system of arterial, collector and local streets, including off-street parking areas; service areas; loading zones; and major points of ingress and egress to the development; notations of proposed ownership,.public or private, should be included where appropriate; Z. Existing zoning; AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the PUD, including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences,walls, and other landscaping; ✓ BB. Proposed signage,with locations and illustrative examples; _ — YES NO N/A CC. Adjacent site information: Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the i PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 3 proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200' of the proposal, exclusive of public r/w at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: (1) Land uses and location of principle structures; ✓ — — (2) Densities of residential uses; — (3) Existing trees and major features of landscape; _ — (4) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals, unless differently permitted by the Planning Director ✓ _ — (5) Traffic Circulation System; — — DD. Supplemental vicinity map: Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one (1)mile showing: / (1) Zoning districts; ✓ _ _ (2) Location of municipal boundary lines; (3) Traffic circulation system; — — (4) Major public facilities including schools,parks, trails, etc.; — — EE. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership; — FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the City Planning Board and Zoning +� Commission certification of approval of the site plan, including a . statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18.54.100; — — _✓ I _ GG. .Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set / forth on the site plan; 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements YES NO N/A , A. Architectural elevations: Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements; B. Landscape treatment: A general landscaping plan indicating: ' (1) . Treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces; — — (2) All existing vegetation with identification of trees by sizes of species; ✓ — — (3) Specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after construction; ✓ — — (4) The scale shown on plant materials; ✓ _ — C. Utility plans: The existing and proposed utility systems and proposed utility systems, including: (1) Sanitary sewers; ✓ — — (2) Storm sewers; PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 _ 4 � (3) Water; (4) Electric; ✓ (5) Gas; ✓ (6) Telephone lines; ✓ _ (7) Fire hydrants; ✓ (8) Trash collection areas; ✓ _ _ D. Street cross sections if different from City standards; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street, including �r the proposed width, treatment of curbs and gutters, sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed; _ E. Physiographic data including the following: (1) A description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping; (2) A map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100'year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City; (3) A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table, fluctuations, and a statement of site suitability.for intended construction and proposed landscaping; F. Drainage plan: Preliminary drainage report and calculations and/or plan, including: (1) All watercourses on the property or which are located within 200' of the property, must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be delineated; (2) All drainage, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc., which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated; ✓ _ (3) All irrigation ditches, laterals, and structures shall be shown; _ ✓ _ (4) All required on-site detention areas, including notes indicating the approximate area and volume of the facility; 5) All plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for the storm drainage ( P P P g from the property, including the name of the drainage-way (where appropriate), the downstream conditions (developed, available drainage-ways, etc.), and any downstream restrictions; (6) Existing and/or proposed grading plan; _ G. Temporary facilities plan: A plan of the site showing the location of all temporary model homes, PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 5 sales offices and/or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities; H. Preliminary subdivision plat: If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; I. Traffic impact analysis: At the discretion of the Public Service Director a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan, if part of such Master Plan, and upon surrounding land uses; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following: (1) Land use and trip generation- a table of each type of land use,the number of units or square footage, as appropriate, the trip rates used(daily and peak hour) and resulting trip generation, _ (2) Traffic graphics showing: (a) AM peak hour site traffic; ✓ (b) PM peak hour site traffic; _ (c) AM peak hour total traffic; _ (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) Total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately); (3) AM and PM capacity analysis: An AM and PM peak_hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect collector or arterial streets and all site arterial-arterial, collector-collector, and arterial-collector intersections within one (1)mile of the site or as directed by the Director of Public Service; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) Trip generation-using Institute of Transportation / Engineers Trip Generation Manual; (b) Trip distribution; (c) Traffic assignment; _ (d) Capacity analysis; (e) Evaluation; (f) Recommended access plan, including access points, modifications and any mitigation techniques; ✓ (5) Additional Analysis Criteria: _ Appropriate clearance intervals shall be provided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle And pedestrian overpasses shall not be at intersections; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be 4' per second with a minimum PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 6 "WALK"time of seven seconds; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required to provide three (3)through lanes in each direction, dual left-turn lanes and right-turn lanes. . Traffic progression will be of paramount importance; consequently, all potential intersections with signals will be placed on '/4 mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service C shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service "D"be accepted for site operations; arterial intersections and turning operations shall operate at Level of Service"C"; if Level of Service"B" is the result of the study, then alternatives of providing Level of Service"D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; generally, the design year will be approximately fifteen(15) years following construction. (6) -Summary analysis explaining: (a) The proposed access points for the project;their location and the rationale for their placement in terms of circulation; — — I� (b) Future off-site road improvements for access,which roads they will be, the projected time frame for their completion and who is responsible for their completion; (c) ADT and level of.service changes to all streets; V/ (d) How traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized — by the PUD; — (e) Describe bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the — development, if used; J. Additional studies and plans: The City Planning Board and Zoning Commission or City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as it is deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed PUD; particularly if the development's compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; — — 4. Reproducible Copy Requirements YES NO N/A In addition to the above document, Site plan and Supplemental Plan requirements the applicant shall submit the following for review purposes: 1 A. One full size rolled(not folded) m lar of all plans and renderings; J —B. One 8%2"x 11" clear film reduction of all plans and renderings for / reproduction and overhead projector use. — * Reference to 18.54.060"Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements"of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance (7/02/90) Fee: $660.00 plus $6.00 per residential unit and/or$4.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable industrial or commercial (includes professional business offices) floor area. i Minimum fee after refund: $500.00 PUD.PREL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQ Aug 2000 7 Adjoiners to COS 1177C Campbell-Lucia Jay Lyndes COS 1177 Remainder Tract 600 Indian Trail 120 fin 2551 Billings, MT 59105-2702 City of Bozeman C-38-A, Drum Lummon Addition, 43 fin 2137 Administration Dept. and P.O. Box 1230 Tract 12, Drum Lummon Addition, 141-355 Bozeman, MT 59771 Bozeman Deaconess Foundation Tract 3, COS 2047, 139 fin 879 901 Highland Boulevard and Bozeman, MT 59715 Tract 13, Drum Lummon Addition 136-164 G:\c&h\00\00220\o ffic e\Adj o iners.wpd 1 CERTIFICATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners of record and each purchaser under contract for deed of property within 400 feet of the property located at Tract C, COS I I77C, is a true and accurate list of names from the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder records and mailing.addresses from the Gallatin County Assessor Records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay Y review of the project. December 14, 2000 ature Date GAc&h\00\00220\office\Adjoiner Cert.wpd 1 G el _ tl _ _�. ;.�, .�U -may •, AS =:W4`T� tom- vx -1 - 4L 4 1 -- __ I HO3PITAt c BP AS R_ 2 R-1 --------------- RS - RS - R-$ --= AS AS Project Number: ,-7 ENGINEERING AND I auo, SURVEYING, INC. Project Name: •Civil Engineering e Structural Engineering a Land Surveying Date: Fig By: 2415 W.Main Street,Suite 1 (406)587.1115 Bozeman,Montana 59718 Fax:(400 587-9768 Subject: A'Y141HAe-,. Page: .__i_ '��.e._Gr..Gl's��Z'—*__`__z...�...L...._., __q....._ t i.......—.1�_....�. __r__.......;.._...q.—.�� i.�...__t�.,..s._._._� _�_ ""_7___.._i,..—..... 7, ......... ol 4 4:f -4- ........... ---------- ba-kif 7ti r-7/L. -4- Z10 —4 '20 �114' ck 1�2 . ........... 71 ,97 le .......... Ga- ............ 7 . ......... .............. .................... :........... ................... ......-------- .. ....................... ............ ............... -2 3 ................... �2; 74, • w ---------------- ----------- --------------- + R-9-617,T,771 .......... -------- ........................... ................. .......... ........ Detention Pond #1 c = 0.737 A= 3.1465 acres release = 0.8225 cfs Storm Storm Runoff Release Required . length(min) length(hrs) Intensity Q future Volume Volume Storage 5 0.083333 3.218458 7.463508 2239.052 246.75 1992.302 10 0.166667 2.05106 4.756347 2853.808 493.5 2360.308 15 0.25 1.575865 3.654384 3288.946 740.25 2548.696 20 0.333333 1.3071 3.031126 3637.351 987 2650.351 25 0.416667 1.130622 2.621878 3932.817 1233.75 2699.067 30 0.5 1.004268 2.328867 4191.961 1480.5 2711.461 35 0.583333 0.908519 2.106829 4424.341 1727.25 2697.091 40 0.666667 0.832989 1.931677 4636.025 1974 2662.025 45 0.75 0.171596 1.789309 4831.135 2220.75 2610.385 50 0.833333 0.720523 1.670871 . 5012.614 2467.5 2545.114 i ;V 100 800 O O b �. Co 90 y N O 700 80 600-- 1/;e 70 s00 - _ 80 400 G c ^ O 50 300 U f- �cII 200 I d0• m FO IN N > co 100 ° e 30 ~ 0 20 ' 10 0 Figure 2-1 Overland Flow Travel Time 2-10 T- ENGINEERING AND Project Number:1 az '79 SURVEYING, INC. Project Name: s Civil Engineering e Structural Engineering s Land Surveying Date: Fig By: 2415 W.Main Street,Suite 1 (406)587-1115 Bozeman,Montana 59718 Fax: (4.06)587-9768 Subject: Page- ... ......... V Z-4 215/& 7 f 4 ........... OA • Tr- �ned- ............ .... ...... I ! i � i f i i i I i r - i ............ 4 -4 ........... .............. . ...... .......... ........ i ............ ...... ........... ........ ... ..................... .............. ............... ......... . ....... ---------- . 4 -4 ............ ............. ........... 4. ....... ... ...... .... ........ ............ ......... 768 Y I I Vol —4- T f e- -------------- ...................... !------- Detention Pond #2 c = 0.737 A= 4.2762 acres release = 1.0143 cfs Storm Storm Runoff Release Required length(min) len th hrs Intensity Q future Volume Volume Storage 5 0.083333 3.218458 10.14316 3042.948 304.29 2738.658 r 10 0.166667 2.05106 6.464036 3878.422 608.58 3269.842 15 0.25 1.575865 4.966432 4469.789 912.87 3556.919 20 0.333333 1.3071 4.119403 4943.284 1217.16 3726.124 25 0.416667 1.130622. 3.563221 5344.832 1521.45 3823.382 30 0.5 1.004268 3.165009 5697.016 1825.74 3871.276 35 0.583333 0.908519 2.863252 6012.829 2130.03 3882.799 40 0.666667 0.832989 2.625214 6300.515 2434.32 3866.195 45 0.75 0.771596 2.431732 6565.675 2738.61 3827.065 50 0:833333 0.720523 2.270771 6812.312 3042.9 3769.412 1 r �I 800 100 - be hO hIT 4O Cp9700 600 80 o 1 500 70 _ 80 400 G 300 50 U -- W Ai 40 ~ -� 200 m CD co 100 ° 60 30 ~ 20 o 10 0 r� Figure 2-1 Overland Flow Travel Time 2-10 Z o 5 •, m W i O OJPy $1IWIl 31VIL Odb 00 lid Y X W Z O N 11 _ I Y a n � a 'a e a g r m y a� V > G a v� n N O . 7 Z z Z � y' c X v �• Q X �,•`�'` p9 pS ��' C u . O O O N n Z N WZ Z O O O PO hJ _,,pO Shp y z W N N p b a Z .::_y...,• p pS tiS C N t� N O �-•tw Wp X.¢ WO pW X .i s�fo,opS Sv�°"j p G X X cu 6 b mc N a$- a QXpS P XX aO Z ZXW c N O N W W W X e b b Z Z W m•,":• x : y 1 Y N u. N N F� .\. � � g O O•. > OV ak �.( '., 3f.1 N-AY M7tlf1M N AO C \. V 7 N N X u W X la •6 W :W z m z W X zX X.'Z Z w X cr ti O w o O a a O Z W �, O s p a o a N f/�-1 z Q 7 a o o N N t 4J OX C .NOE. i._. . .: :'��I.� Gatatin Count SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND WeedContro( REVEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) Ntrkt (Revised November 1999) Projected date for preliminary Plat application 00 . Date Plan received OCT 19 2000; Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board. This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board, this plan must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or appointed Representative in cooperation with the agency resppnsible.for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATI�O^N i 1. Name of Cooperator: L y6 f�� pp(Print F II Name and/or Name of Company) . J` i lzr�clrrt f`,�ICR FCI, 1.3s%t'rAc�Ai �f i S (L-10(,, S(9—DUO (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2. Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: le /1EM Legal Description: 5C 1/4, c5� 114, Sec. T. _. _N(�1 R. If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel Pit/Etc: I 177C. 3. Land Use (Please check the appropriate box(s) (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop X Other ❑ Please explain (b) Future Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ i Please explain 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes No ❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Wee Management Plan of and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes [►� No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator een Informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan.of the District? Yes No'❑ i 7. Has the Cooperator been informed oft a relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes [ No ❑ i 901 N. Black Bozeman, MT 59715 (406)582-3265 B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes® No ❑ If yes, list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s) / le lo 7. 9 aGkel "W& //�2 Ile'y /Ar elAl7L,6,,s �ow��� 7. e Q-41cll-- a N16 &1 t ;5711e, _ ,-417'-�- 1,940 h -eau you P (Gallatin County no)dous weeds are listed in section III of No)dous Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/developmentl disturbance of the property. Note: if noxious weeds already exist on the property, please outline these infestations on a map of'the area /orthe subdivision plat ................. Gk_k"/ Cu tl iI7/i-a G1 z4,i /t �Oobi S di- 1 3.. Please complete the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Chemical Control: �u«Isy Chemical Name Rate G *-Chemical Name Rate 6dlacrej /c—/S'��h��o *Timing and method of treatment(s): c/eP4 Oleo, 4r01P 7`j w.74 /J07— E sc o}-� S'Di4 SCed STe�/- 1:j l�io�rc.s� «c� ���f'gh��l�C ,�1�J��YhfC GviT� Cobtsd�is� /�lST1G� (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: Methods of weed control 'Timing of control method(s): 'Weed Control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor ' (c). Biological Control: 'Biological control agent(s) Timing of the release(s) of the Bio-control agent(s): — Weed control method(s) used to control weed spread while insects establish .............................. `Weed control work done by- Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor _ C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS 1. Are there land(s) already disturbed or that will be disturbed on the property? Yes© No❑ If yes, explain ;" 0 s1 U:r- 7. ,?a Gtrr r b-dle J eSv4-ry Cc4. fIk"-e_;"I_le , I 2. If the answer was (YES) to question 1 above,what method(s)will be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed argas (seeding, planting, sod, etc.) e to d D // / Sced cis ��- S•,ci 3. If applicable list the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: TypeL._ luea-girs, A`,a e-,Rate Type S vJ , Rate of arc vrg'Ua-w Type Rate 4. If applicable list the type and amount of fertilizer to be used: Type Rate Type r Rate 5. Timing of revegetation practices: Approximate cultivation date(s) 4 ' �. /of�. V �' Approximate seeding/sod date(s) Approximate fertilizer date(s) NOTE: For revegetation recommendations contact the Gallatin County Conservation District(Natural Resource Conservation Service). . i C - D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN II APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS NOT APPROVED ❑ RECOMMENDATIONS The Gallatin County Weed District approves the submitted Weed Management and Revegetation Plan with .the following recommendation: _Recommendation One: Cooperator will initiate .weed..control measures on ' that portion of the property that will not be under disturbance in the Spring of 2001. Cooperator will contact and inform the Weed District when j the control measures are completed. (Signature of Weed Board Cha n/Re resents e) (Signature f Cooperator) Supervisor, Gallatin Co. Weed District (Date) (Date) WMP-1 P D CiO CST- PLAN ' rr!/!'r.n A�wFlAv nnOen n>o a': , ,IK d 4 n vl Aimin - !.£w'.al.?. I7 __..._.__Itw-aFT__ 'J-T-J�r•yr -J.i 1 -'L•tree.A J �i.."i(`_I I , IA••- - _.-• �- J.���_. ,n..,.r a 'J _� ..'1^'•l,M ._\ _ _ ".-.Y_'_�' _ z>��n�-u i' t � ;�!'S<"�:,-1...>,' _ — l u. "s[,•yet �_ _ 1 �'._ �P\ _ ram/. L�c � .� .r<.; .X''i' �,.F'finee arta/ I / __ -' ry� - S.W w., l'�1 •-- _.� _I -��-� �X � \, ''Y ''{.f�. T YI rto tvir* 'Irt`��� _ _ - !�t+,l "+• .1 '•.L .I � '��•. a�t� �,1 Y I "' f N,1 J�_. -', ,1A a!i'1` - _ _.-- �- _ -- - � � L ..�a�.� I ��+' ., I•, 6�_�q: _ �/ o-`m 1 fDm.in um"t n - <o.ow,C'?y ~I i •` _ - I. "' •0,1 1 2 , \.� ,ac J..1 `t' t..,u.•IN! y�c_.-•- _ _ :a- r LOT 3 1 _,e aEN' I \ .eq.it..�u.:+�'•I" _ l� JG WP ' y;..__,....:- 4.. ,i t•.-. 'nelrQ�_• �.a,: � ..... �'" - _ - u�I �r�..i.. __.�_' {• � <` Y u �.` •�T� _ _ Iu]'r Pic to, • 11641A1.1 Fftl t - {• _ �` _� � I — � •>( "I. ..1,. \1 y� — Err r.�,� 1� ., �.'�' as �,- •. T 'i � _ 1 1 X-'' '•L'': 1 ' r.. X%�� _ _-_.. _' y.-�C'-.. � ., ' .J�':,' ,[ LOT¢rZi { ' 1 i'•. T_2 '�nay..3�n', SPAEf _ �r ,p'ri':.i ��''g b'- - •,.• �.� cc Noam �..r '("g-._. :ad _ ..A \ .I `i 1 {I ;�; '` ,J(•',`fl G 1, r/:,,.o.n I - ' r�o-aei.� -_ J "j-+'•'•�` A'. �`.,''. `'J ) ti.�_�,:I.;I (•: i.�;it* XI :{ _J ..i � ��[� f� '��n [s"` ✓i! .<`.$� 1 ', _ -_ _ 1�, 'ili'�'ti:>'� eCX. ;1 _ I '�... m I, � .•Xr .X' /, (n� _ ._ ..._ [nq ..e _ .'' .\ - i {; =?iiLJ_A;: I FF I {{ f� �!"'"'a it�a.-`b'm�rmF�:`""Srta-�_,','Yd►T Aao.rA_ "J- - 'i I - e rCv tu) � r ,m n.i•ic:.n .-C• .._.,nr (' '•.,>�,.N.d_.\�..--..:- -- '�9774s lL1J, ___'.,_. E �~n aT17 ftJ oa nod t an- Th is t/2. AREA*TABULATION — aLa MEET APJ,I,r BiIpMCS )G]I]G R L)i3 A"a _ AFv1 c�PAKP/3VCN5R:WDACLY 1)i,lS]30 R 1!t)AX! ' 1 1• 4' mlT AF;A m.17 s]n 7..t —ts 9 T NNNatI lnfl2 �RTfn nYlcO zzw Ai jfmux LEGEND mw i it to In lNwlu rn!amnAx m Ntmr auto Cw4)n M T.•.I c,c—..-b FI s•.n-v N.I l nc A> ai lf4F.mM <q�a_tea i—lZ^"f+.o>® © matte.Narwr�i:e+uAnNac to a o-'us+w,-s .maa nnak mn Am a1rtrA o rn cae sc ez1:! t1 a ,] f..e-br h ---- NiwaS 9NSTA9Y•'MJi IlN! A147C.lY13 N AIIC OI4Nl SHAICL A cl0 C63!®.nYC.{2'.LLI. Jf I/4 JT r/A•}IiaOl,1,!,1 1.,N.!1. fJI.Y.. N-IL'asa,ut!/g]1Lf)(1-IN C91Y',1 1 nrC .P.A caG m]Nl ll.b)w Nlbn C.L�W c. *A NM-ro !!l7•1 D* Y:\lE!UHc 1-0•YI Sfl1LT aUf1O 01.1,fl IAS:mA6 1 IOIIIIW.AO eIOnC!V 191 Cab TG @]SL co.f•. )�bne! 1/rl n�S,N:al1nT IT llrl al AI naa!!PO�'a (ap !SmXa�1 6!A i!1 KFAS Or N lalDl'!C IF3a KVET V!p WS iB:AbE /pRgl1'3a[6 fRllltj •Cell !M•�a SPaI neNAlepN OM1nA S41Dne N FTaa T a+m✓ml "1A WLnc m-1 .11 �TYPICRLN STREET SECTIONS o-..,A.Ir.o.I.•m d•d•, �j_ Pn,iaulNr. `�.../ fA'fiA'LLhlA'G M^l ibvnNv„-Hn.la J.., A. ?/rxF a PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2000 27 3 3 9 1 0 8 9 00559 ORDER NO. : 1-65090 TO: C & H ENGINEERING (2) CC: C & H ENGINEERING ATTN: MATT COTTERMAN 2415 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 1 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY To the County of GALLATIN and the City of BOZEMAN in Montana CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, with its principal office in the City of Chicago, Illinois, and duly authorized to insure titles in Montana hereby certifies that from its examination of these public records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the real estate described in Schedule A hereof, as of the 30TH day of NOVEMBER 2000at 5 o'clock P.M.,the title to the described real.estate was indefeasibly vested in fee simple of record in: Merle H. Adams, Jr. and Deborah K. Adams; Michael E. Tate; Gary F. Lusin, LLC and Campbell, LLC as their respective interests appear of record. subject only to the objections,liens charges,encumbrances and other matters shown under Schedule B hereof. The maximum liability of the undersigned under this certificate is limited to the sum of$ 200.00 rThis certificate of title is made in consideration of the payment of the premium by the subdivider of the land and for the use of the County and City above named. Issued by: AMERICAN LAND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE COMPANY By: P. 0. Box 396 Bozeman Montana 59715 587 - 5 63 %, riR �f�.,s t . i r ATTEST: Pres' ent Authorized Signatory Thomas A. Cahill Secretary PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE(MONTANA) Reorder Form No.9113 Schedule A Page 2 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00559 Order No.: 1-65090 Beingthe legal description of the real estate covered b this certificate. g p Y The following described parcels of real estate: Tract C of Certificate of Survey No. 1177C, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, and located in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 2 South, Range 6 East, P.M.M., and being further described as follows: g rn Beginning at the Southeast Comer of said Tract C: . g thence westerly 269°51'30" assumed azimuth from north, 1097.34 feet along the South line of said Tract.C: thence northerly 000°06'31" azimuth 212.87 feet along the west line of said Tract C; thence easterly 079°16'14" azimuth 109.65 feet along the west line of said Tract C; thence easterly 079°24'12" azimuth 495.61 feet along said north line; r thence easterly 081°25'05" azimuth 180.05.feet along said north line; thence easterly 087°00'37" azimuth 323.73 feet along said north line; thence southerly 179°53'16" azimuth 365.47 feet along the east line of said Tract C, to the point of beginning. SCHEDULE A Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) Schedule B Page 3 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00559 Order No.: 1-65090 Being all of the estates, interests, equities, lawful claims, or demands, defects, or objections whatsoever to title; and all easements, restrictions, liens, charges, taxes (general, special, or inheritance, or assessments of whatever nature), or encumbrances; and all other matters whatsoever affecting said premises, or the estate, right, title or interest of the.record owners, which now do exist of record. 1. Except all minerals in or under said land including, but not limited to, metals, oil, gas, coal, stone and mineral rights, mining rights and easement rights or other matters relating thereto, whether expressed or implied. 2. Taxes for the second half of the year 2000 and subsequent years. Taxes for the first half of the year 2000 are paid. Taxes for the second half of the year 2000 are due and payable and will be delinquent if not paid on or before May 31, 2001. Included within the General Taxes are Gallatin Conservation District, Gallatin County Water Quality District and Bozeman Planning Board. (Taxes for the year 2000--first half- $788.94, second half- $782.61. Parcel No. RGH23190) 3. Special assessments levied by the City of Bozeman for 2000-2001 under Receipt No. 1 First Half- District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. Installment- $1.,354.19. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. Installment- $276.54. rFirst Half Installment is paid. Second Half: District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. Installment- $1,354.18. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. Installment - $276.53. (continued) Schedule B Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) Schedule B Page 4 Certificate No.: 27-3391-089-00559 Order No.: 1-65090 Second Half Installment is due and will be delinquent if not paid on or before May 31, 2001. No liability is assumed for any special assessments, snow removal, sewer assessment or garbage assessment not set forth in the Assessment Books of the City of Bozeman. 4. Matters disclosed on the proposed plat as follows: a. Certificate of Dedication The above described tract of land is to be known and described as NORTHERN ROCKIES SUBDIVISION P.U.D., City of Bozeman,Gallatin County, Montana: and the lands included in all roads, avenues, alleys, and parks or public squares shown on said plat are hereby granted and donated to the use of the public forever. The roadways ' dedicated to the public are accepted for public use, but the County accepts no responsibility for-maintaining the same. The owner(s) agree (s) that the County has no obligation to maintain roads hereby dedicated to public use. a The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person or firm, whether public or private, providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas cable television, , water or sewer service to the public, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of their lines and other facilities, in, over, , under and across each area designated in the plat as "Utility Easement"to have and to hold forever. b. 10 foot wide utility easements c. 25 foot wide utility and Stormwater Drainage Easement. 5. Right of way for, or any portion fallingwithin Ellis Road running across the above g described property as.disclosed by Certificate of Survey No. 1177-C. 6. Right of Way Easement to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Com an , PP Y recorded June 6, 1977 in Film 37, page 1830, records of Gallatin County, Montana. 7. No Search has been made for water rights and unpatented mining claims, and liability thereon is excluded from coverage of this certificate. TC/CB END OF SCHEDULE B Schedule B Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) �, R i h TRACTS Z a 2 G i v3 R d n. �I'E �l f 1•R iy q 1)oz[.lev[u•il S �-'�,N � � y� � y �A u� S� •l � ! — � S'1.=.)•➢ 'B u O N�� C' 9 r'Cj n� �-,Lp �U N $�_ Av :, a� N c)Il'vi • 7 Sc` �^_' — f1;90'E+r31{f- - 1 �` p> r �i �- _f`I'�—.•f-, _ '�t!''e.rle Ulaily Cplwn[nl � l to�• �`�'�'�._ '4 -� � ��I� � �� dc4�1 (i•aroe';rrv,) I �t —.T �'ug l J.� . � .II L`•.5•aside 11UUy Ep_e1::n1(Typ,� 1 �-� f�, i a roucrla'eI- - �119 1 �J I <Ij( '•I 99� `1 SF.Or�It o, i' 1 ka ❑ A`{ u� �a na9l CI '}�, KIP r 1 1_4i I VA } r Il+•.+rani x!` .� [rK�:�.'.O• �� �% � - ~ � r I l/ i /0V i r•� I �n� ����� I �� I � Isoavd'vi[I� �1 M1gir3w u[I I / I E d Og 1 CC ,n'.n,c.�1-,i ,y" 'r—���OJ—r'l':•FK~ r✓\/�.�'A'�. .t `-1'-' y o „ . / qt V Iv I I^UO I UWQ Em—_ 71 ( / rS06]l5'aa'E� g F . y s a rJ (SgU09'36'EI �'1 S q RI v� ^'oI ona ��ps:71�z' _�.n for ' n �:I17aCf0�.4 '! n I 7 ^I )3 (1 - fill gyp 7�, 'I °•^ _> __ _ - , AdAt.� �Cta _ ,^ _ LLSuZD iCi�.i '.O.n 'D ��tn OO l —�` x0 �iSIDV M 4• Tf �'4� 'I = -�! 3� it o` J �'>> - o '•T 0" - ct Old i2'� �S'c - .M1� Ia __ I• 3z o'4.:r fl IJ G - :_2,a'k7 75 3i_.3 pro K� -r,�z"g - LZ:E I, I, - 9° v e2.vn 'ae._.�•:^- 'tc "'tn' 7, - _ )_I u •c iSa�Pi- p - _ IN O _ '''Ji I- S�i�- 01 m �3� n Y 121 _ v "•s7o"•'�< _�':�2 .s is _ rr.^u y r� Q csie:� :jilt 0 i5 19 9 x.3 ,= K� - g:Lal� aze.n i�g2 'L�u '°G ,a �c•n Gs0"°, A 7 _ ,so js s' "ffi" 1U�' OR n?°v „ _ o - °_' 'I ° ' n c '-J`� 3o€tq o `3�- sc`_ P99j 55�O�r! Pl 19 ' l 37 e n3 °d✓ $ 32eE�73a ' (7 n � TJ �.a., £' D _ ofi. o _ ";`5.�, �_^- _ 5 --- FIE1 Qa� ;,�;6 Z qo _ •nWIN _ °s.. t ¢¢ ,�',Fu p,) 0 I G n �' S' L3-'n m '•° _ m °fix U �3_ ` ig+ ��Eg `� ? TOR ^�'� z - =�F 1. _ f' b_ I ue �;3 a I .' ��u (' I h � r �"xa^",late, m 'J c�a I eggQ����' m- %ry_ 0 m ,°;.� 1 �:3 r`s "..�43 r °).�-9 � NAG AI -sue•`• C � L �cJI .� -,-I � � - PYI" ?:c,7V. �Lo � .,.3a- f°two T1 .2.: f g 'I;a 0 �� a?y � - ',a� N ��a9 .R "Q °-3 P Q 'i Gxz < �.c �i:�•'• 3�1aZh�4 +S_ �.4� 4' ° °_ - 02 ; u'n°' o l'y Z C .'^;R .Ae u A 3c mp oo C m '-ram - fi"s- _ Zw'= - ss AIR '� •• ^� N' n? q^ (q �2 its - 'o V! -it A �'bc � i5 :fi0r -�� ' nnn �oil - �, c�c� ° _ 2-7•. r - 3 ,SKr, - s a^ va 2 ;F:^ R ag_m xi all - o' NORTHERN ROOKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER PRELIMINARY P.U.D. PLAN a s In(N a Fr,d 5(5 P.H+m alit. CCNNEC7 4.AtMANSOARY T CVtl?S70 WATER PARCEL 1 I,hAAm.c�(P7'R) 70 C714iIN&AI,NNS AT COMSiOCK APARI,>Nr175 COS NO.C-38-A LIFE OF MONT,INA " ru1LAPE Ca1CRE1E CLAPS a CUTTER ZONED 8P - Alt]SIDCttYN(147 A PART Or iR6 PRD+ECT) UNDEVELOPED n 1/3 _ ,,;,;;; • •t:"sl �. .. {, 4'.:. tzs,Y PARCEL 2 / Tnd s/a Riw"tPt'Cl COS N0.C-38-A uv - .s - Y Ari i'9 cis' r5.,;'• 1�+•'S' ,� r r - X > „_' a ,.�.r1' / ZONED EP - / UNDEVELOPEDNEW 7la-7 ..St'l,-"5• ,: r ? _ -`~-- - -\t- \ `\ \ _ 7 IYie. 9 - \ 5 / Fbrllm+oT Eli,Slreel cei / �Y.r�...A.'t' tt:.'<.. •. � _ - �� �\ �-T- -V a,=..^�._- _ CITY OF BOZEMAN RECREATION COMPLEX / Pkf a1 DPL7J LUMMON ADTd110N/ -�.r�t�� h •�•�i 1 '• - �•l -` -'\� \ „).,,.,�:,•, - `�-` -FM S/4•R[am wlln ,p�.� i t,'^� 1S 1^.4 _.t':•'a` �_ � - - e I m n ZONED PLI • a%[vIS a�55'e4-z3 � a , w•f,4 c.�h•°• .•.. �_,� (s I , r � I I FL.+3.0 �� RT ���A.•«. � __•�,�}.���r tt�'a' ..ram •,�- -,. "_--� "r' I� I / � BETIt]AWet / 8:26( '�1z i�t'�• ��_-'l� � ( 2)+' \ 154 I TOP OF NOFFTN SIDE or sro=M DRAIN 9 v �.. o ELEL'P1gN-1037.60 FEji ♦ »' h"�.(3 Y "••• •(59. ) .Y S6Tl 5-' •,. } LOT 0 (cllY o7 Bo:EM.aN pAruMl � �jl, k risk 3E"`� _ _ _ = I BR Pr 1a �q aa7 W.eICR V.eIyES tDY�`if7.igr Y �', ? - J • Nam/' C+. S"•' �ygD--•-• DItOQI ED PT i U!"EN I P.P. - / � \' I �j \ +a ) • I ci I \ I I C {• L' r'`� J Y.F.EtEt-tLo Aran I I\ (/7,) 47. \ - ,a � �y�,•�fi `rr{-•.r'�Yc�•� 7 `� ' - As�`a __ �si•✓� r"v'�g_ �• - -�-- L"•=:J ------------------ � I \ '�'° ` L_ _ � r Ys .r /§ 1. `•".^,3:I/ _ - ^.-.i:`1d I r1DRIr \ I a�,,�, ,ae --+�- - ,.y-- •��:� ��� _% � I � �, �� o � .e (63e ¢fE.el YDP.AN '6r' L _� �/�s1 ,ao •A � (_ p I F a� 7 e3• �,�t".7- 7 l / / 1.1.� li i BI l Is `-_- R,, �---�- -(� 2� / i" ,ln>.., 6'D:P Y 6- i ✓)tr (-+5) ( 1 s we r M, +I,/+ P ,e l•178 3)\ ss, / (a1:61 // (� e �$ J OP;IC Ird� f 43/e'P�r glln ^�I� / � I I (65.95) �v0 I .. 4 __- _ _ _ -�-_- _ PN3\S •'12 V':'6ii-6� 11.51 y.(,.95) � / r��'e J +.�'C(:urlAcn-lb ne) a -i }�',p•��n}. 1 I X ., G)I� a i (66.95 „ »u -� '1` \ems \ - '\, t .Ay,, y (r1.g 1 + + 77 l�7)r a � (( � ?:;� / /�• / '16aI<.) (,11 J: s, E i ! �� t Is s), V I .� f +I \,�I�' -_ a-�c P / ( �/ � I (59.6{r s• E�7E-rt+ n,. // SP�.E I ��7 •t � I F _ --- - 9 O S ff ( . ) Y / ! � EM. OEPCONE. N +f60.61 I6.r}+ � an 735v017 `-- C•t �� i lP � D I t I I a I J Q ci V A c L' I \7 .._ - I f.P.FtF i Arlo ne .�I'' �' \ I I ---- - - TI.B51k �•b.'r. , \\ r< 9•'s � J ii � e0p � Z � I I i � j // I c' ?3 - ------ t n. • � c2 (Jxr.q . `\ �� 1 2s s u � \ I -QOI/. o � III e�Q�YO _ f619!• •(sL» I � /// l I �73.3 (73' (71.6) . . (-S- f72.5 .t+ \ 3 ss \\\ ..( s/.s)\.a�' s � Ij� � �„).. � . :�9, (63Sy_ I I .u7 1 / .^'i6l fresl„ FJs 1• o) fTD.. �8 I rs) ,+ N+.. II ` I I ( � I d^.,1+ ! Y % 7 / /r ?�-- _ ( .0 7n 1, s� -- 71 011 .35) - - _ Ir e•I(rmda�-- f 1593- -m \ - / / / / / I n ,� rr .. _ \ y BOr�AN DEACONESS HOSPITAL \ 1U87.S/ U/G rIBEP OPTIC LINES CITY OF BOZEMAN LIMITS rna 5/B'Rmm«Im A j ZONED A-S ��� 2e51Jo- (u) ~ „/2•It,.Cap(PI'L) (sBs51.30'wl UNDEVELOPED -�= • ZONED R-51 I AREA'TABULATION AREA OF BUILDINGS: 81451.2 SO. FT. 1.871 ACRES AREA OF PAVED/CONCRETE SURFACES: 151029.72 50, FT, 3.597 ACRES AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 92535.79 S0, FT. 2.124 ACRES _ i\T TOTAL AREA: 335.017 SO FT 7.6909 ACRES ELLiS STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARKING TABULATION ruTURE TO BE CONSTRUCTED RECULAIR PARKING SPACES 316 TRACT C.CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NO. 1177C - R/Y1 fL 30, R/Vr SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SECTION B. 1, 2 S.,P. 6 E. y1CJ nl,r,- MAP HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES 6 OF P.MM.. GALLP.TIN COUNTY. MON?ANA COMPACT PARKING SPACES 79 1' 5' 5.5' 6.5' 1- 19.5' S.� 5' 1 '-•� 101AL PARKING A03 2% ORE 3:SLOPE 3%SIDPE 2R SLDPE CgpC - BENCHMARK T ----=-� es SDEWALK S FWALK NaF J ' LEGEND 3'BImAANOUS SURFACE L STRIP TOPSOIL 10 SUB-GRADE ELEVATION ELEVATION = 85i 60 FEEETET - TOP OF NORTH STORM COWACTED 70 97%MARSHALL OU7SDE OF EYISTING GRAVEL ROAD SURFACE. _ Scale Im Peet (CITY OF BOZEMAN DATUM) �, ` -J@ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 6'OF 1 1/2_MINUS CRUSHED NOTES BASE COARSE COMPACTED 1, INTEGRAL CURB AND CUTTER AS PER C.O.B'SPEC.02528 d 0 d0 PROPOSED SANITARY SEW ER LINE 70 95%OF AASHIO 1-99 AND C.OLB.37D.D11C.902528-1. t2 0 12 OWNER 1 sYrE PROPOSED WATER LINE INSTALL 9.OF 6'AIINVS PN RUtI MATERIAL ON 2. SIDEWALK AS PER C.D.B.STD.D'AC.y02529-10.AND¢G2529. Scale In .Hetme - PROPOSED HYDRANT COMPACTED SUBCRADE(INSTALL CEOTEXIILE 3 FER7,UZWG PNQ SEEDING AS,PEP.CO.S.SPEC.02223 CAMPEELL/LUCIN. L.L.C. - - �-`r AS REO'D BY ENGINEER) (TCPSOILINC 8•SEEDING ON CUT&FILL AREAS ON 3499 BROCER CANYON ROAD I -- ' .(73.D) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPERTY SIDE OF SIDEWALK) Contour Interval: r foot BOZEM.AN,Ntt 59715 7 a. CEOrE71ILE FXeRIC WILL BE USED DEPENDING%I 511E CONDITIONS / I DRAINAGE DIRECTION - AS REO'D BY ENGINEER(LIGHTVDIGHT NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ARCHITECT 1 FABRIC CONTECH C-45) _ � ® PROPOSED STORM GRAIN , TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS a TIP SIGs 'NO PARKING ANYTIME" SIGN ENGLNaEMIG+lJVD BAYLISS ARCHITECTS. P.C. PER C.O.S. STD. DWC. NO. 09810-I C1 SCALE:NIS �4LN SURVEMG LNG. 812 q TRACY AVENUE •ar •�+•>�K�r ,r, BOZEMAN, M, 59715 NOT TO SCALE aSTOP STOP SIGN ?315 Pesl train 5lteet.SLfle I Btffem+n..YnnI na 69715 pxl SD-1115•Fer.(rod!9d7 9 LA•r1E2*m,iq}m!-5Tlltt DATE PREPARED: 12/15/00 anr,��n Yet ■ ■■■■■ J IIi v��rr�ii�R ��� 4: ■ ■■ ■ J ■ 1 � � - _■■ ■■■ ■ i iiil!!il .. ,, ■■■ ro■ ■ Screening Plantings Screening Plantings Picnic Tables Garbage Ent Si n Enclosure D "Pond" Low Berm Screening Plantings Entry Sign Entry �l� ��- -7 - x Sheet .s Ellis Low Berm a If t ,Agin ,,-� •. . �� l_ -._ " E>T� Entry Si n �-�� �' It , i � �s � { �� � t _� �� I' 2' 'Lot 5 r i Entry 1 PI ° K�MS �., `� `�\��\ •.dam _�y__.�'\ \ \��\����p `1 �r _ � - _^_\• _.,,�� y g v`t- ! _o I, _.664 �. 1 �t t It _ �= - i l 4[ ._t. - ' _ L r i�1L I �1 I Qom: _ ' <`�J .✓'�J��J� � � � •-✓�' ,� �,,.�,` tlt„• - .. ;.r = _ 1 ". (�z I 4. ,.•.. .-- � " �? `'T'• � __ t '� - ^\ Lot 2 Y \•' - / l Y � ) � I �HY�Ar rj✓ � -- � I r� (' usw � � �� � � < -• lot 6 ,-•�• �L��� Lot 1 v Lot 1,. - ! , ; 1 — "t LU �(�/ I- i. I n, -� - % •r t '"�,. _I, 'i. .., I `I d `r -!`�� ��� I�f r I ,I �•\ `:,— ` < <[�' <F: :I;7�< (< i. Small Bridge Picnic Tables Dry "Stream" & Seating Area N - 0' 30' 60' 1201 bayliss CTA - (AND��02KS G>~ou P Bayliss Architects TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street 1 BOZEMAN MONTANA PREPARED FOR C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc. PREPARED BY �.� •0N TA H ROBERT R. MARVIN & ASSOCIATES = p 36"vI" • W •:Z144 1001 S.24,n Street West#111 ;, .•Rf� Eo Billings, MT 59102 `,•^••1••''`•��,�`� December, 2000 Professional Traffic Operations Engineer#259 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 , SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Streets 3 Traffic Volumes 5 Traffic Operations 7 Speeds 8 TRIP GENERATION 8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 11 TRAFFIC IMPACTS Traffic Volumes 13 Capacity Impacts 15 , Safety 18 Pedestrians 18 ACCESS & INTERNAL CIRCULATION 18 ' IMPACT MITIGATION & RECOMMENDATIONS 20 APPENDIX"A"Traffic Volumes 22 APPENDIX"B" Capacity calculations 23 APPENDIX"C" Speed Study 24 APPENDIX"D"Turn Lane Warrants 25 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE 1 Figure 1. Site Location Map 2 Figure 2. Existing ADT& Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 6 Figure 3. Primary Trip Distribution 12 Figure 4. Site Traffic Assignment 14 Figure 5. Existing Plus Site Traffic 16 1 Figure 6. Off-Site Capacity Impacts 17 Figure 7. Peak Hour Traffic At Site Accesses 19 LIST OF TABLES ' Page ' Table 1. Trip Generation Northern Rockies Professional Center 8 Table 2. Trip Mode, Trip Type & Net Vehicular Trips 10 Northern Rockies Professional Center , Traffic Impact Study � 1 1 i 1 1 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes existing conditions,trip generation characteristics,trip distribution,traffic assignment, 1 and impact analysis within the structure of a traffic accessibility study. The study was completed for a proposed development to be located in the southeast comer of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street in ' Bozeman,Montana(see Figure 1). The study was prepared for C&H Engineering,who is preparing the P.U.D. documents and site plan for the developers. The property is known as the Northern Rockies Professional Center P.U.D. This development is Tract C., C.of S. 1177C, located in the SE 1/4, SW 1/4, of Sec.8,T.2 S., R.6E of P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Because of local laws and ordinances pertaining to subdivision developments with potential for traffic impacts on the surrounding street system,a traffic accessibility study is required prior to site plan approval, and building permit approvals. Marvin & Associates was retained by C&H Engineering to provide a traffic impact study for the proposed development. Having reviewed the proposed development plan,Marvin&Associates completed an extensive analysis of existing conditions; trip generation and traffic assignment; capacity and safety impacts; and mitigation measures. All of those efforts are summarized within this report. ' The prima purpose of this stud is to address specific impacts of the new development with regard to street primary Y P 9 system access and circulation,and to provide mitigating measures to reduce or eliminate identifiable impacts. In addition, the study provides a specific evaluation of planned street system changes and redirection of existing traffic created by those plans. Study methodology and analysis procedures within this study employ the latest technology and nationally accepted standards in the area of site development and transportation impact assessment. Recommendations made within this report are based on accepted standards and the professional judgement of the author, with consideration of the traveling public's interests as a primary ' objective. i 1 . Page 1 F.Ma%n S t. E. Babcock , Q Vl a E. Olive 3 U E. Curti yd9 9 , 7d i � /nt@�Srate 90 Ellis St. , 1 = HOSPITAL Ja. �a Northern Rockies Professional Center Figure 1. Site Location Map Page 2 ' SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION ■ The proposed development would be located in the southeast comer of an intersection involving an arterial ' street(Highland Boulevard)and a local street(Ellis Street)which connects to another arterial Street(Haggerty Lane). The existing property is currently vacant with no existing structures. The proposed development ' would contain 6 lots with building pads ranging in size from 7600 to 28200 square feet. The buildings within this development will be medical offices, which will compliment Bozeman Deaconess Hospital (southwest of ' the site) operations. Within the subdivision, a circulation road which would serve all parking lots for each building would be ' accessed by two intersections with Ellis Street. The internal circulation road and all parking lots would be channelized with curb&gutter and landscaping. Access to the existing street system would be provided on Ellis Street at two locations. The western approach would be located approximately 500 feet east of the Highland Boulevard intersection. The eastern approach would be located approximately 600'east of the west approach and approximately 120'west of the eastern property line. ' EXISTING CONDITIONS ' Streets Adjacent and potentially impacted public streets are: Ellis Street, Highland Boulevard and Haggerty Lane. Streets and intersections which are not adjacent to the site, but which could experience some degree of } M,7 r impact are: Highland and Main, Haggerty& Ellis, and Haggerty and Main. Ellis Street is local r st eet with variable width and surfacing. At its intersection with Highland (photo right), it has a paved width of approximately 28 feet. The pavement only extends for a distance of Page 3 approximately 150 feet where it becomes an unimproved dirt road. 'pp y p d Within the dirt road section, it has steep grades,sharp curves,and a rutted surface. Ellis also extends west of the Highland intersection. The wester section of Ellis is a 28' wide paved streets and serves as one of several accesses to Bozeman Deaconess Hospital. Ellis Street is stop controlled at its intersection with Highland Boulevard. , At the Haggerty Lane end of Ellis (photo left), Ellis becomes a 36'wide paved street with curb , &gutter on both sides. An apartment complex is located near the intersection of Haggerty and Ellis and it is the only property along Ellis Street that is currently developed. The undeveloped , roadway portion of Ellis extends for a distance of approximately 1500 feet. , Highland Boulevard is a north-south arterial street which has two travel lanes within a 28'wide(bc-bc) ' curbed street section(photo right). It has a 10'wide paved bicycle path on the west side. Highland ' Boulevard extends from Main Street on the North, to a point south of Kagy Boulevard, a distance of , approximately 2.1 miles. It serves as the primary access to Bozeman Deaconess Hospital which is located southwest of the planned development. Highland Boulevard was apparently constructed at half of it future width,since it is apparent that the roadway is not centered within the street right-of-way. It is not known whether the bicycle path is a temporary facility ' which will be incorporated into a future roadway expansion or if some other type of facility will be constructed Page 4 in the future. Highland Boulevard widens south of the Ellis intersection to provide turns lanes into the main hospital entrance. k Haggerty Lane is an arterial roadway which serves as 71 primary access to subdivisions southeast of Bozeman. It has a continuity of approximately 1 mile and is half urban ' and half rural in nature. Near its intersection with Main Street, it is 44'wide with curb&gutter on each side. At it intersection with Ellis Street(photo left), it is 28'wide with no curb&gutter. Ellis is stop controlled at Haggerty and ' site distance along Haggerty at the intersection is good. Traffic Volumes Detailed traffic counts were taken on all area streets in early November of 2000. Hourly count summaries can be found in Appendix"A"of this report. Turning movement counts were taken at four intersections during the peak AM and PM hours, between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m. on November 2 &3, 2000. Figure 2.illustrates these counts along with factored Average Daily Traffic(ADT)calculated from peak hour volumes and automatic recording counts. There were no significant pedestrian movements at any of these intersections,during the counting periods. Only 3 bicyclists and pedestrians used the path at Ellis along ' Highland during the peak a.m.and p.m.counting periods. Trucks were approximately 3%of ADT on Highland, 1% of ADT on Haggerty, 3%of ADT on Main, and 0%of ADT on Ellis. The most significant feature of traffic ' volumes illustrated in Figure 2 is the directional split on Highland Boulevard. During the peak p.m. hour,60% of the traffic is northbound and 40% is southbound. In the a.m. peak hour the directional split is opposite in direction with a 39/61%split. Page 5 0 3 0J � l0 J1 � l4 ' 1 7-8 AMA 0 2 4 30-5:00 PM 0 7-8 AM 4:30-5:00 PM 215— 312 552 491 414— —366 575-- ---475 127�� /r— 171 163—\ f— 138 90 �� 40 154--., 38 1f � 18 f2� 0 , 117 . 21 134 43 1 17400 F Main St E. Babcock Q H 00 m E. Olive ; U F 4SO ,O y E. Curti d9 � e 0o so i''te� \-ADT (TYP) State g ' � 0 Or�O �900 Ellis St. 20 1 1700 1 30 1 p 69 2 + 0 ) I � I� HOSPITAL 10 �/ L 2 , 0 7-8 AM 0 7-8 AM 5 --- � fir— 4 \Jd• 2 f 4 a 1 0 175 256 37 I 2 �Oh 52 3 4:30-5:00 PM 1 4 30-5:00 PM 0 �. 1 1t � tiev 40 � 6 2 402 Figure 2. Existing ADT & Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Page 6 Traffic Operations Traffic operations on the surrounding street system during peak hour conditions vary by location. The only intersections that experience noticeable delay is the intersection of Main and Highland and the intersection of Main and Haggerty. The northbound lane on Highland at Main occasionally develops vehicle queues that are 15 to 20 vehicles long. These queues disperse rather quickly and do not occur throughout the entire peak p.m. ' hour. That approach currently operates at level of service (LOS) "C"during the peak a.m. and p.m. hours. ' The northbound approach on Haggerty at Main suffers from extensive delay on the left turn movement. Sufficient roadway width exists so that right turn traffic is not delayed by the left turn movement. Existing ' capacity calculations(see Appendix B) indicate that the northbound left turn movement operates at LOS "D" in the a.m. and LOS "F" in the p.m. Capacity calculations using the HCM procedure fortwo lane highways,which is not entire) applicable to urban Y PP street sections, indicate that Highland Boulevard currently operates at LOS "D". However, observations of actual conditions would classify the LOS higher than "D" because there are very few approaches and ' intersections along its length. Traffic appears to flow at reasonable rates of speed between intersections. Therefore,intersection capacity actually controls this street's level of service. Left turn movements on Highland ' at the intersection of Ellis and Highland are calculated at LOS A. The most striking operational character of Highland Boulevard is the fact that the street section provides absolutely no room for stalled or emergency vehicles. Since this is the main access to the Hospital, it would appear that 10' shoulders should be made available to accommodate the most basic concepts of incident management. One incident was observed, during the short data collection period, which involved a stalled truck. Long queues formed in both lanes and the driver had to control traffic until help arrived. From the conditions noted, it appears that very serious traffic operation issues could be related to the current typical street section on Highland Boulevard. Page 7 Speeds Appendix C contains a spot speed summary conducted for northbound and southbound traffic,north of the Ellis Street intersection of Highland Boulevard. This study indicates that 85"percentile speeds are 41 mph in both ' directions during free flow operations (off-peak hours). TRIP GENERATION , Table 1. presents trip generation estimates for the Northern Rockies Professional Center with the land use ' assumed to be Medical and Dental Office Buildings, ITE Code 720.Trip generation rates were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Report, Sixth Edition. Rates and total trips are shown for the average weekday and for ' peak a.m. and p.m. hours. Table 1. Trip Generation -Northern Rockies Professional Center ' ITE Code 720 - Medical-Dental Office Building Generation Units= 1000 Square Feet ' Number of Units = 85.7 Average Weekday Rate = T=40.892(X)-214.970 Peak AM Hour Rate = 2.43 80% Enter ' Peak PM Hour Rate = Ln(T)=0.921Ln(X)+1.476 27% Enter Number of Trips: Enter Exit Total , Average Weekday= 1644 1644 3288 Peak PM Hour= 56 152 208 ' Peak AM Hour= 211 53 264 The total projected average weekday trips (AWT) of 3288 appears to be high compared to existing ADT volumes of 9700 on Highland Boulevard. However,not all of these trips will be vehicular trips nor will all of the ' trips result in new traffic on the street system. Thus, it is important to know the type of trips to properly evaluate traffic impacts. At this point,it can be assumed that transit would not play a substantial role in modal trip exchange. Therefore,minimal trips could be attributed to that mode. Some percentage of trips could also be assigned to pedestrians and bikes. This number would probably not be significant during winter months, ' but could be during summer months. For purposes of analysis,a conservative estimate of approximately 2% of all trips generated was used to account for transit, pedestrians and bike modes. Page 8 ' ' Since this development would incorporate six different buildings with some diverse and complementary businesses, trip interchange between businesses will likely occur. It is known that developments which are built adjacent to complimentary facilities, such as those found in shopping centers and office parks, tend to ' capture trips from and to adjacent developments. These trips are part of the total trip generation number, but do not involve trips with origins or destinations external to the site. They are known as"Internal Capture Trips" (ICT). The ITE Trip Generation report contains information used to estimate ICT. The Colorado-Wyoming section of ITE has completed some studies of these factors and have developed some guidelines. A moderate degree of internal trip exchange could be projected forthis subdivision with approximately 10%of all trips being Internal Capture Trips. There are also three classifications of trip types related to use of the street system: 1) Primary purpose trips ' are trips for which the development is a primary destination from any particular origin. 2) Diverted linked trips are trips made to the development as a secondary destination and are diverted from a path between an origin ' and a primary destination. 3)Passerby trips are also trips made to a development as a secondary destination, but the primary trip path is on the adjacent street system, ie. stop on the way home from work. The ITE Trip Generation report provides methods of estimating passerby trips for various facilities. In most cases involving medical offices, passerby trips would be very minimal. In this case, the location of the hospital with respect to the site would tend to increase passerby traffic numbers. Also,this site is located on a commuter route with ' housing developments on one end and commercial developments on the other. This would add to potential passerby trips. It was estimated that approximately 5%of the trips would be passerby trips, even though the ' potential for higher proportions exists. Table 3., on the following page, is a summary of the various trip types that can be expected with this development. The net number of vehicular trips at the site access points is equal total trip generation less transit/pedestrian trips and internal capture trips. The number of new vehicular trips using the existing street system would be all of the primary and diverted linked trips or net vehicular trips less the number of passerby trips. Thus, on the average weekday, there would be approximately 2750 more vehicles on the surrounding street system and during the peak PM and AM hours there would be 220 and 173 more vehicles respectively. Page 9 Table 2. Trip Mode, Classification& Net Trips Peak AM Hour: Peak PM Hour: , Completed Building Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Gross Number of Trips 211 53 264 56 152 208 ' Ped &Transit(2%) 4 1 5 1 3 4 Net Vehicular Trips 207 52 259 55 149 204 , Internal Capture Trips 21 5 26 6 15 21 Net Vehicles At Access 186 47 233 49 134 183 Passerby Trips 10 3 13 3 7 10 ' Net No. of New Vehicles 176 44 220 46 127 173 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ' There are various methods of determining the directional distribution of trips to and from site developments. ' Forlarge and complex developments within the middle of a large urbanized area,the task is best accomplished by creating a computerized transportation model of the urban street system and including the proposed , development changes. Trip distribution for moderate sized developments may be completed by manipulation of data provided by a current transportation plan. Smaller developments or developments on the fringe of a , small urban area can be easily handled by using existing traffic volumes on adjacent streets or by an area of influence method, or both. , In this case, a transportation planning model was developed for the 1990 Transportation Plan and 1993 plan ' update. In 1995, Marvin & Associates modified the model for the Durston Road Corridor Study to reflect accelerated growth being experienced in Bozeman. Additional modifications and specific details within the subject development area were added to the year 2016 QRS 11 model for purposes of analyzing trip distribution , and projecting future street system volumes. Translation of subdivision trips to employment data was necessary within the modified model. In addition, the model parameters and path tree building functions Page 10 ' assigns traffic to the street system in a manner that would be difficult to illustrate sufficiently for an accessibility study. Therefore,the model results were extracted in terms of trip distribution to and from the subdivision. With this information, manual traffic assignments were completed, which provides a better level of detail for ' accessibility analysis. ' Figure 3., on the following page, is a graphic summary of directional trip distribution extracted from the traffic model for primary trips. Since the major population centers are south and northwest of the proposed ' development, the model tended to load primary trips to and from those directions, with 52% north and 43% south. The model indicated a split in traffic at Main Street with about the same number accessing northwest regions of Bozeman from west Main Street as those utilizing 1-90. Travel time calculations were made for two alternate routes that could be used from Main Street. It was determined that the travel time to and from the ' Main Street Haggerty intersection to the site is almost exactly equal. Therefore,a split in the 27%primary trips utilizing the 1-90 corridor was made at that juncture. Passerby traffic distribution is based on the percentage of total traffic entering the surrounding street system during the peak a.m. and p.m. hours. In the morning the highest percentage entering the site would be 61% in the southbound direction and in the evening the highest would be 60% in the northbound direction. TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Assignment of site traffic to the street system and site access points is dependent upon several factors. Two of them are, directional distribution and operational site conditions. Directional distribution was discussed in ' the previous section. These proportions are used to provide traffic access demand which represent traffic movements to and from the site which would occur if street operations and internal site circulation had no effect ' on the direction of arrival or departure other than the access point used. Traffic distribution is further refined by calculating potential travel times within the sites and at ingress and egress points. The combined calculations of demand and least time accessibility are used to estimate the optimum traffic volumes at each access point. 1 Pagel 25% ' �—� F Main Sr aj E. Babcock ' Q 27% L N a E. Olive 3CL ' U E.Curti Ax ' �m m ail 38% 14% . o /nt@�stdte 90 ' 23% 770% 9% Ellis St. ' 5% , 34% HOSPITAL , a Figure 3. Primary Trip Distribution ' Page 12 , Figure 4., on the following page, represents the assignment of vehicular site traffic volumes on the existing street system. Also indicated on this figure,are percentages that this traffic is of existing ADT. As an example, Highland Boulevard,north of Main would experience an additionall045 vehicles during the average weekday. ' This is approximately 11%of current ADT calculated for this section of street. It is highly unlikely that 1045 vehicles would be added to this street immediately. By the time this development is complete and fully occupied, it is likely that the background traffic on Highland would have increased by 5 to 10%and the actual impact of 1045 vehicles would be less than 11 percent. Therefore,the percentage numbers shown in Figure ' 4. only serve to illustrate relative volume differences. ' Figure 4., also presents the results of traffic assignment analysis for the peak a.m. and p.m. hours. These volumes were calculated by applying primary and passerby trips distributions to full development vehicular trip ' generation. Proportional trip generation of each lot and least travel time for each access to and from each of the site lots were used to assign traffic to each possible turning movement. The negative numbers indicated ' in Figure 4., represents the result of passerby traffic redirection. ' TRAFFIC IMPACTS ' Traffic Volumes ' Impact for site development can be found simply by determining the change in traffic volumes expected. Site traffic assignments indicate what volume of traffic could potentially be added to the street system during the ' average weekday (AWT)and at the peak PM hour. The percent change in AWT only provides a general level of change and is used to identify locations where impacts could be significant. Determination of volume changes during peak traffic flow periods provides specific information on the type of impacts that could potentially occur. In almost all cases, it is very difficult to determine ADT on any section of street to within 10% accuracy. ' Because of that fact, impact analysis on street with relative percentage increases less than 10% are not normally considered critical. The percentages indicated on Figure 4., indicate that Highland Boulevard and Haggerty Lane would both experience increases slightly greater than 10%. Ellis Street,which currently carries ' less than 200 ADT, would experience an increase many times that of its current level. Page 13 AM PM AM PM ' 6 -� 24 12 -� f— 6 44 �� fir— 24 12 �� fir— 6 0 —� �� 24 0 /r— 6 1 r 1 r 1 r 1 r 11 6 32 12 0 6 0 19 ' 685 4% ' F Main St E. Babcock ' Q � � � 90�So E. Olive 3 �� E. Curti yd9 9m �.� % �, ph o ✓ d of lote�state ? 90 ' g 4S Ave. Weekday Site Traffic Ellis St. 211 ' 140[8%] o , : j % of Existing ADT ' o -4 72 o \ HOSPITAL �— 19 AM 2 , 8 -_ AM 1 �- 16 ° } r 163 p d -3 PEAK HOUR r�a� -1 ' SITE TRAFFIC 19 �\ AM PM 51 1 PM Enter 186 49 2 PM 6 ' fir— 45 Exit 47 134 ra ' -2 Figure 4. Site Traffic Assignment 1 Page 14 , Figure 5.,illustrates the assignment of full development sito traffic to the surrounding g street system and relative volumes that would result if the development existed today. None of these volumes or conditions will probably occur due to the dynamics of background traffic growth and other unknown development schedules. Capacity Impacts Appendix B contains capacity calculations for existing conditions along with existing plus site traffic. Figure 6.,on the page following,presents a summary of capacity calculation in terms of level of service(LOS)for two different conditions:existing and existing plus site traffic. Level of service(LOS)designations(A thru F) are ' shown for critical movements at five intersections and access points. The following narratives explain the capacity impacts at each intersection. 1 ' It was determined that the only intersection which would be impacted by the added site traffic would be the intersection of Ellis Street and Highland Boulevard. Those impacts would occur in the peak p.m. hour period and they would occur on the Ellis Street eastbound approaches. The eastbound movements would go from LOS A to LOS C . Even though the amount of site added traffic on that approach is minimal, added traffic ' on other legs of the intersection would cause enough delay for eastbound traffic that the LOS would be reduced. 1 Capacity calculations on Highland Boulevard using the HCM"Two Lane Highway„method,which is not entirely ' appropriate for this situation,indicate that the LOS would drop from V to"E". Since existing capacity was only 32 vehicles away from LOS "E", this change is somewhat misleading. As stated earlier, the capacity of Highland is totally dependent upon the capacity of its intersections. Therefore,capacity impacts on Highland are relatively insignificant. 1 Page 15 1 0 3 0 � 0 1 14 ' 1 7-8 AMA 0 2 4 30-5:00 PM 0 7-8 AM 4:30-5:00 PM 215-- 312 552 491 220— —390 587— ---- 481 ' 171—\ �� 195 175� f— 144 90 64 } � � �- 154� �r- 44 107 I 117 95 250 1 220 11 , 0 1 27 134 62 18100 F. ' Man Sr E. Babcock >>S00 Q ' y 0 E. Olive 3 900 E. Curti yd9 9 , z `d' a i o�ADT (TYp) 0 /nte�state 90 1 ♦�y0 ?�s0 Ellis St. 260 ' 1850 t : 0'0 2 1 69 i 74 HOSPITAL 1 17 —/7-8 AM_ 00 7-8 AM ' 5 —� �— 30 85 lb 160 255 ' 52 --/ 54 4:30-5:00 PM ' 25 :0-5:00 PM 6 2 � ,,-- 45 6 20 400 Figure 5. Existing Plus Site Traffic ' Page 16 ' 1 A B® AM PM B B--o' AM a—C© _/ PM -'I —C© �A® �B® C CC—�— � C© �� �COC I D A F B @ ® T Ma-n S t. E. Babcock Q L N t. m E.Olive o 1 a y U � � E. Curti yd9 1 9� 1 � e 0 7gte�State 9 0 ' Ellis St. A AM O AM I �HOSPITAL � B _Existing LOS ©B—<— B® A O (g)—LOS w/Site Traffic A A D A ©A C © At" PM A PM ' Figure 6. Off-site Capacity Impacts ' Page 17 Safety 1 It has been determined that no substantial impacts to efficiency of the existing street system would be related to the site development. However, some degree of impacts may be associated with traffic safety. Sight , distance was checked at the Ellis and Highland Boulevard intersection along with sight distance at the Ellis Street approaches. It was determined that adequate intersection sight distance exists. AASHTO and MDT ' guidelines were checked to determine if auxiliary turn lanes are warranted for any of the intersections and approaches. Appendix D contains both right and left turn nomographs used in the warrant procedure. From this reference material, it was determined that the additional southbound left turn movements on Highland at , Ellis would require an additional left turn lane. A right turn lane for northbound traffic would not be triggered by this development, but may be warranted as background traffic grows in the future. I Pedestrians , From traffic counts and observations, pedestrian demand is not high during the winter months. It is expected ' that the proximity of the bike/pedestrian path will encourage pedestrian access to the site. A crossing at Ellis should be noted as a concern, but study data is unable to define the exact demand and what level of control , is required. It may be necessary to measure demand after development has begun and determine if that demand is sufficient to justify a formal pedestrian crosswalk. ' i ACCESS& INTERNAL CIRCULATION , I Figure 7., on the following page, is a summary of existing plus site traffic at the two ste approaches for peak ' a.m. and p.m. hours. Capacity calculations ( Appendix B) indicate that both of these approaches would operate at LOS "A"during both peak hours. Both intersections will operate efficiently with single approach 1 lanes and no vehicle storage problems at the intersections would be encountered. Since both of these ' approaches would have traffic volumes at the same level as Ellis Street traffic, it is recommended that stop signs be installed to reinforce the right of way rules. ' 1 Page 18 ' AM 31 55 AM 64 —� fir— 19 90 48 r 79 —� r� 24 17 5 I 20 5 58 y PM 8 18 —- 5 o ` 58 PM 49 1 m 21 �� �— 5 4 5 14 0 56 18 E11is Street s _LOT 4 LOT S LOT 3 OPEN SPACE t0 � a � u OPEN SPACE LOT T LOT 6 s.mm rcr OPEN r_ www LOT 2 SPACE •r 7 2 1 i N-2 Ail O ram.u'K�r K. rrwr ti m Figure 7. Peak Hour Traffic At Site Accesses Circulation within the site is provided by an internal roadway with a proposed median. Because of unique problems that can occur with medians, the following design recommendations are made: • Medians within an approach to a public street should be setback behind the crosswalk and marked crosswalks should be carried across the approach. The minimum face-of-curb to face-of-curb width for both entering and exiting lanes should be 18 feet to avoid blockage by stalled vehicles or maintenance equipment. • As with medians at the intersection approaches,a minimum width of 18 feet is required to allow room for circulation around maintenance or stalled vehicles in the single lanes. • Medians within the site should be designed so that moving vans can turn into and out of individual approaches, this requires geometric layout with SU turning radius templates. • Medians at intersections.should not have landscaping taller than 30 inches to protect critical line of sight.. • "Keep Right" signs on the end of median islands and turn restriction signs are needed is some circumstances. IMPACT MITIGATION & RECOMMENDATIONS Development of this property as proposed would generate a substantial volume of traffic. The most significant impacts would be on Ellis Street adjacent to the site. C&H Surveying and Engineering has submitted a plan to reconstruct Ellis Street east of Highland Boulevard along the development's property boundary. The new street section will provide approximately 30 feet of paving within a future 37'(bc-bc)curbed street section. This +�would mitigate potential impacts on Ellis at the access points. Some consideration should be given to transitions and connections to the existing roadway on the east end of Ellis Street during design review, to ensure that the transition is safe. Page 20 This study also determined that a left turn lane would be needed for anticipated southbound traffic volumes on Highland Boulevard,at the Ellis Street intersection,to mitigate potential rear-end and left-tum accidents. The study also determined that the existing width of Highland Boulevard presents potential safety and efficiency problems with regard to incident management. Observed capacity of the street sections appears to be acceptable except when incidents block a lane. Therefore,it is believed that Highland Boulevard should have been constructed as a multi-lane facility from Main Street to the Hospital. Widening near the intersection for the left turn lane will improve the safety of the Ellis intersection,but will not alleviate the potential problems that were built into the original roadway. It is recommended that the City of Bozeman consider implementing the phase 2 construction plan as soon as possible. If such a task is not possible, it is recommended that the southbound left turn lane be implemented prior to full development of the site plan. Page 21 I � APPENDIX "A" TRAFFIC VOLUMES Page 22 HAGGERETY LANE S OF MAIN NORTHBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 3 3 0.2% 2 1 1 0.1% 3 3 3 0.2% 4 4 4 0.2% 5 9 9 0.5% 6 50 50 2.6% 7 138 138 7.1% 8 126 126 6.5% 9 125 125 6.5% 10 123 123 6.4% 11 153 153 7.9% 12 169 169 8.7% 13 144 144 7.4% 14 134 134 6.9% 15 121 121 6.3% 16 139 139 7.2% 17 175 175 9.0% 18 132 132 6.8% 19 75 75 3.9% 20 46 46 2.4% 21 32 32 1.7% 22 15 15 0.8% 23 15 15 0.8% 24 3 3 0.2% ' A Total 753 1182 1935 100% GRAPH �j 14% 13% 11% cu 10% 9% O8% ...-. 7o� _. ■ }' Weekday 6% 5% Q� 4% a. 3% 2% 1% Ell 0% Hours of the Day HAGGERETY LANE S OF MAIN SOUTHBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %ofti Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 7 7 0.3% 2 2 2 0.1% 3 1 1 0.0% 4 1 1 0.0% 5 43 43 2.1% 6 36 36 1.8% 7 130 130 6.4% 8 167 167 8.2% 9 103 103 5.1% 10 104 104 5.1% 11 116 116 5.7% 12 152 152 7.5% 13 157 157 7.7% 14 150 150 7.4% 15 144 144 7.1% 16 165 165 8.1% 17 206 206 10.1% 18 121 121 5.9% 19 64 64 3.1% 20 74 74 3.6% 21 36 36 1.8% 22 34 34 1.7% 23 16 16 0.8% 24 7 7 0.3% Total 867 1169 2036 100% GRAPH �I 14% 12% 11% - O 10% F— 9% Weekday L Q� 4% -. 0- 3% 2% - - 1% 0% Hours of the Day HAGGERETY LANE S OF MAIN NB & SB r Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 10 10 0.3% 2 3 3 0.1% 3 4 4 0.1% 4 5 5 0.1% 5 52 52 1.3% 6 86 86 2.2% 7 268 268 6.7% 8 293 293 7.4% 9 228 228 5.7% 10 227 227 5.7% 11 269 269 6.8% 12 321 321 8.1% 13 301 301 7.6% 14 284 284 7.2% 15 265 265 6.7% 16 304 304 7.7% 17 381 381 9.6% 18 253 253 6.4% 19 139 139 3.50% 20 120 120 3.0/o 21 68 68 1.7% 22 49 49 1.2% 23 31 31 0.8% 24 10 10 0.3% Total 1620 2351 3971 100% Day Factor= 1.1 Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 4457 GRAPH 1 % 13% 12% j 11% i i O70% j 9% I i 0 9% C) 5% 4% !. ._ .. f2 3%.� - 2% I i 1% I 0% i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day HAGGERETY LANE S OF ELLIS NORTHBOUND Hour 11/02100 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 0 0 0.0% 2 0 0 0.0% 3 3 3 0.4% 4 3 3 0.4% 5 11 11 1.3% 6 33 33 4.0% 7 93 93 11.3% 8 73 73" 8.9% 9 44 44 5.4% ' 10 30 30 3.7% 11 58 58 7.1% 12 76 76 9.3% 13 72 72 8.8% 14 51 51 6.2% 15 46 46 5.6% 16 47 47 5.7% I, 17 55 55 6.7% 18 49 49 6.0% 19 30 30 3.7% 20 16 16 2.0% 21 15 15 1.8% 22 6 6 0.7% ' 23 8 8 1.0% 24 1 1 0.1% Total 273 547 820 100% GRAPH 14% 13% 11% 10% I_ B% � 8% ■ a+ 7% Weekday Q: B% L 5% 4% 11 3% 2% .. .___. 1% - -- 0% Hours of the Day t/ HAGGERETY LANE S OF ELLIS SOUTHBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 - 2 2 0.2% 2 0 0 0.0% 3 1 1 0.1% 4 0 0 0.0% 5 1 1 0.1% 6 13 13 1.5% 7 28 28 3.2% 8 40 40 4.6% 9 41 41 4.8% 10 42 42 4.9% 11 57 57 6.6% 12 53 53 6.1% 13 54 54 6.3% 14 52 52 6.0% 15 65 65 7.5% 16 71 71 8.2% 17 113 113 13.1% 18 65 65 7.5% 19 41 41 4.8% 20 54 54 6.3% 21 23 23 2.7% 22 30 30 3.5% 23 11 11 1.3% 24 5 5 0.6% Total 478 384 862 100% GRAPH 14% 13% - - 11% O 10% O B% ■ -6. 7% _ _ _ Weekday (1) 6% U 5% L Q� 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% Hours of the Day HAGGERETY LANE S OF ELLIS NB & SB Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. . %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 2 2 0.1% 2 0 0 0.0% 3 4 4 0.2% 4 3 3 0.2% 5 12 12 0.7% 6 46 46 2.7% 7 121 121 7.2% 8 113 113 6.7% 9 85 85 5.1% 10 72 72 4.3% 11 115 115 6.8% 12 129 129 7.7% 13 126 126 7.5% 14 103 103 6.1% 15 111 111 6.6% 16 118 118 7.0% 1 17 168 168 10.0% 18 114 114 6.8% 19 71 71 4.2% 20 70 70 4.2% 21 38 38 2.3% 22 36 36 2.1% 23 19 19 1.1% ' 24 6 6 0.4% Total 751 931 1682 100% �. Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 1888 GRAPH 14% 11% i .. .. O10% I F- 9% _ _.. __. .. ._._. O 8% 4- 7% _ N8% ` 5% .. ._ 4% _.._. .. - CL 3% 2% 1% 0% f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day ELLIS WEST OF HAGGERTY EB & WB Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 4 4 1.0% 2 0 0 0.0% � 3 1 1 0.3% 4 0 0 0.0% 5 4 4 1.0% 6 5 5 1.3% 7 27 27 7.0% 8 17 17 4.4% 9 14 14 3.6% 10 26 26 6.7% 11 14 14 3.6% r 12 36 36 9.3% 13 22 22 5.7% 14 31 31 8.0% 15 35 35 9.1% 16 39 39 10.1% 17 24 24 6.2% 18 23 23 6.0% 19 21 21 5.4% 20 12 12 3.1% 21 17 17 4.4% 22 5 5 1.3% 23 6 6 1.6% 24 3 3 0.8% Total 185 201 386 100% Day Factor= 1.1 Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 433 GRAPH 14% 13% _ - - ... _......_.. 12% 11%.� _. ... .._ 0 ,9% O 8% -- r- 796 .. .....,. .. _. _.._._. 8% i ... .._ ._.. . ` 5% 4% L. ---......_ D. 3% 2% ----. 1% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day ELLIS WEST OF HIGHLAND EB & WB Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of ' Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 1 1 0.1% 2 4 4 0.3% 3 0 0 0.0% 4 2 2 0.1% 5 13 13 0.9% �` 6 40 40 2.7% 7 86 86 5.8% 8 146 146 9.8% 9 147 147 9.8% 10 117 117 7.8% 11 149 149 10.0% 12 132 132 8.8% 13 146 146 9.8% 14 128 128 8.6% 15 111 111 7.4% 16 124 124 8.3% 17 88 88 5.9% 18 27 27 1.8% 19 12 12 0.8% 20 6 6 0.4% 21 6 6 0.4% 22 7 7 0.5% 23 0 0 0.0% 24 1 1 0.1% Total 382 1111 1493 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 1676 GRAPH 14% 13% _ . .__..- ...__..__.._.. -. .. .. _ _...... 12% 0 10% F- 9% 0 8% i. - ------ r..r 7% .. ... U 5% i - L 4% j ._.. ... ._.----..._ �. a 3% I 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day. ,. ELLIS EAST OF HIGHLAND EB & WB Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 6 6 3.1% 2 5 5 2.6% 3 1 1 0.5% 4 0 0 0.0% 5 0 0 0.0% 6 1 1 0.5% 7 11 11 5.7% 8 18 18 9.3% 9 10 10 5.2% 10 14 14 7.2% 11 21 21 10.8% 12 30 30 15.5% 13 11 11 5.7% 14 15 15 7.7% 15 19 19 9.8% 16 8 8 4.1% 17 11 11 5.7% 18 1 1 0.5% 19 7 7 3.6% 20 3 3 1.5% 21 2 2 1.0% 22 0 0 0.0% 23 0 0 0.0% 24 0 0 0.0% Total 51 143 194 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 218 GRAPH 14% 13% i 12% i 0 10% .. .. .. _ 9% O s%.ij. 7% .- s% U 5% a) 4% j 3% - - 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 �� Hours of the Day HIGHLAND SOUTH OF ELLIS NORTHBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. %of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 6 6 0.2% 2 6 6 0.2% 3 4 4 0.1% 4 6 6 0.2% 5 30 30 0.8% . 6 59 59 1.6% 7 185 185 5.1% 8 207 207 5.7% 9 235 235 6.4% 10 234 234 6.4% 11 311 311 8.5% 12 313 313 8.6% 13 206 206 5.6% 14 275 275 7.5% 15 294 294 8.1% 16 407 407 11.1% 17 361 361 9.9% 18 188 188 5.1% 19 105 105 2.9% 20 99 99 2.7% 21 43 43 1.2% 22 35 35 1.0% 23 27 27 0.7% 24 15 15 0.4% Total 1574 2077 3651 100% Day Factor= 1.1 Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 4098 , GRAPH 14% 13% 12%.� -- 11% ' 0 9% ! 0 896 - ... .. _ _ .... 7% ... _..._ - .. _ _. ___ .... ... N6% I 5% Q) 4% n. 3% 1% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324 Hours of the Day HIGHLAND NORTH OF ELLIS SOUTHBOUND Hour 11/02/00 11/03/00 Avg. % of Begin THU FRI Weekday Weekday 1 16 16 0.4% 2 5 5 0.1% _ 3 4 4 0.1% 4 6 6 0.1% 5 21 21 0.5% 6 92 92 2.1% 7 301 301 6.8% 8 458 458 10.4% 9 338 338 7.7% 10 323 323 7.3% 11 273 273 6.2% 12 330 330 7.5% 13 390 390 8.8% 14 365 365 8.3% 15 324 324 7.3% 16 295 295 6.7% 17 293 293 6.6% 18 196 196 4.4% 19 127 127 2.9% 20 78 78 1.8% 21 81 81 1.8% 22 53 53 1.2% 23 34 34 0.8% 24 14 14 0.3% Total 1495 2922 4417 100% Day Factor Month Factor= 0.98 ADT= 4958 GRAPH 13% 12% � 11% i -3 10% _. 0 8%- - �+ 7% .....-- -- C 6% '.... .._.. ._ CU 5% -- 4% a 3% -- 2% I - -- 1% 0% I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 Hours of the Day APPENDIX "B" CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Page 23 I MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:27 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 197 vph 299 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 1112 pcph 994 pcph Movement Capacity: 1112 pcph 994 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 99.7% 99.3% LEFT TURN FROM. Major Right Leg Major Left Leg Conflicting Flow: 200 vph 342 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1384 pcph 1189 pcph Movement Capacity: 1384 pcph 1189 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.8% 99.7% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.7% 99.7% THROUGH FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 544 vph 504 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 591 pcph 619 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: 588 pcph 615 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 100.0% 100.0% LEFT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg ' Conflicting Flow: 505 vph 503 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 563 pcph 565 pcph 1 Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.99 0.99 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):1.00 1.00 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: 557 pcph 561 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSER VICE ANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes - Shared Minor Bottom Leg I Volume I Capacity I Capacity I DELAY I Level Of Service i X Left Turn 6 557 668 5.5 B-Short Delays Ave Delay X Through ! 0 588 668 5.5 B-Short Delays 5.ec X Right Turn 3 i 1112 { 668 i 5.5 B-Short Delays Shared Minor Top Leg i Volume I Capacity I Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left Turn 15 561 651 5.7 B-Short Delays Ave Delay X Through 0 i 615 j 651 5.7 B-Short Delays 5.7 sec. 1 X Right Turn 7 ; 994 651 5.7 B-Short Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service Ave Delay X Major Left Leg 3 T 1189 3.0 A-Little Delay I 0.0 sec. X Major Right Leg 3 1384 2.6 A-Little Delay i 0.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.3 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob ' 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:27 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg Y=YIELD CONTROL 4 I SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. f Grade= SHARED LANES X X X 0% , RADIUS<50 ft S S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE �, NO RIGHT TURN LANE F— Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) Major Left Leg Grade= 0% NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN S S S RADIUS<50 ft , Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg , VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg _ left thru right left thru right left thru right I left thru right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 1175 4 2 230 69 4 0 2 10 0 ; 5 _PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .70 .70 .90 .80 .70 .70 .70 .75 i .75 .75 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 j 194 6 3 256 86 6 0 3 13 0 7 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 3 1194 6 3 256 86 6 1 0 3 15 0 7 VOLUMES INPCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES 1 7 0 5 86 1200 F-- 256 1800 Major Right Leg 3 3 Major Left Leg 1800 194 --� 1200 6 6 0 3 NOTE: Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:31 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.rNT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg —� Y=YIELD CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= SHARED LANES X X X 0% RADIUS<50 ft S S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE �, NO RIGHT TURN LANE Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) 1 Major Left Leg Grade= 0% NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE 1 NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN S S S RADIUS<50 ft Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS — Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg left_ thru right left thru right left thru right left thru right _UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 160 85 74 226 69 30 17 I 21 10 10 5 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .80 .80 .90 .80 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 _PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 2 178 1106 92 251 86 40 23 j 28 13 I 13 7 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 1 3 178 106 102 251 86 44 25 31 15 15 7 VOLUMES INPCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES I I 7 5 5 86 1200 E— 251 1800 Major Right Leg 102 3 Major Left Leg 1800 178 -� 1200 106 4 2 3 NOTE: 4 5 1 Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the isshared eet Left Turn Laneis Minor-Bottom Leg 1 MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:31 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS , EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 231 vph 294 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds ; Potential Capacity: 1071 pcph 998 pcph Movement Capacity: 1071 pcph 998 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 97.1 % 99.3% LEFT TURN FROM: Major Right Leg Major Left Leg Conflicting Flow: 284 vph 337 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1265 pcph 1195 pcph Movement Capacity: 1265 pcph 1195 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 91.9% 99.7% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 89.8% 99.7% , THROUGH FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 663 vph 673 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 517 pcph 511 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.89 0.89 Movement Capacity: 463 pcph 458 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 94.6% 96.7% LEFT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 630 vph 645 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 482 pcph 473 pcph , Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.87 0.85 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):0.90 0.88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.89 0.86 Movement Capacity: 429 pcph 405 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X Indicates shared lanes Shared Minor Bottom Leg Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service i X Left Turn 44 429 539 8.2 B-Short Delays Ave Delay X Through 25 463 539 8.2 B-Short Delays F 8.2 sec. ' X Right Turn 31 I 1071 539 8.2 B-Short Delays Shared Minor Top Leg ' Volume � Capacity ( Capacity I DELAY ( Level Of Service I X Left Turn ( 15 405 ; 482 , 8.1 B-Short Delays Ave Delay X Through I 15 I 458 482 ; 8.1 B-Short Delays ! 8.1 sec. I X Right Turn 7 ( 998 I 482 8.1 B-Short Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service Ave Delay X Major Left Leg 3 1195 3.0 A-Little Delay 0.0 sec. ,le-Major Right Leg 102 1265 3.1 A-Little Delay I 0.7 sec. , Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:29 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.FNT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 448 vph 308 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 842 pcph 984 pcph Movement Capacity: 842 pcph 984 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 99.4% 99.7% LEFT TURN FROM: Major Right Leg Major Left Leg Conflicting Flow: 450 vph 331 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1060 pcph 1204 pcph Movement Capacity: 1060 pcph 1204 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.7% 99.3% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.6% 99.1 % THROUGH FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 789 vph 767 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 449 pcph 460 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity: 443 pcph 454 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 100.0% 99.8% LEFT TURN FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 768 vph 768 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 405 pcph 405 pcph Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.99 0.99 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity: 400 pcph 399 pcph SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared 'Minor Bottom Leg I Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left Turn 0 400 842 4.3 A- Little Delay Ave Delay X Through 0 443 I 842 4.3 A-Little Delay F 4.3 sec. i X Right Turn 1 5 842 842 I 4.3 A-Little Delay Shared Minor Top Leg Volume I Capacity I Capacity I DELAY I Level Of Service X Left Turn 76 399 409 { 10.9 C-Normal Delays i Ave Delay X Through 1 454 409 ]0.9 C-Normal Delays 10.9 sec.. 1 X Right Turn 3 984 ; 409 ]0.9 C-Normal Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service i Ave Delay ' X Major Left Leg 8 I 1204 3.0 A-Little Delay 0.1 sec. I X Major Right Leg 3 1060 3.4 A-Little Delay 0.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.1 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob i 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:29 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg Y=YIELD CONTROL SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= SHARED LANES X X X 0% , RADIUS<50 ft S i S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE J, � � NO RIGHT TURN LANE F— Grade= 0% Major Right Leg � LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) ,Major Left Leg Grade= 0% -� NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP.OR YIELD SIGN S S S RADIUS<50 ft , Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg _ left thru right left thru right left thru right I left thru right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 6 402 2 2 256 37 0 0 3 -52 1 1 2 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .70 .70 .90 .80 .70 .70 .70 .75 ! .75 ; .75 ' PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 447 3 3 284 46 0 0 4 69 i 1 3 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 447 3 3 284 46 0 0 5 76 1 3 , VOLUMES INPCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) AND SATURATION VOLUMES 7 3 1 6 46 1200 F-- 284 1800 Major Right Leg 8 3 Major Left Leg 1800 447 1200 3 IO 0 5 , NOTE: Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:32 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH S=STOP CONTROL Minor Top Leg Y=YIELD CONTROL i SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Grade= SHARED LANES X X X 0% RADIUS<50 ft S S S NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN NO ACCELERATION LANE I � NO RIGHT TURN LANE Grade= 0% Major Right Leg LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. SHARED LEFT LANE SHARED LEFT LANE LT SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. (2 LANES) ' Major Left Leg Grade= 0% NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCELERATION LANE NO RIGHT TURN STOP OR YIELD SIGN I S S S RADIUS<50 ft Grade= X X X SHARED LANES 0% I SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. LARGE POPULATION Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS — Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg left thru right left thru right left thru right I left thru right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 6 400 1 20 21 255 37 45 6 54 52 25 j 2 I 1 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .90 .80 .80 .90 .80 .75 .75 1 .75 .75 75 ! .75 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 j 444 25 26 283 I 46 60 8 72 69 1 33 3 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 8 444 I 25 29 283 46 66 9 79 76 , 37 3 VOL UMES IN PCPH Minor Top Leg (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) ' AND SATURATION VOLUMES 3 7 3 7 6 46 1200 283 1800 Major Right Leg 29 8 Major Left Leg 1800 444 —� 1200 25 6 9 7 1 NOTE: 6 9 Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of Queue Free States when the Major is shared. Minos Left Turn Lane Minor Bottom Leg MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:32 AM C:\UNSIG3\HIGHEL.INT HIGHLAND&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM CAPACITYANALYSIS RIGHT TURN FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 457 vph 306 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.6 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 833 pcph 985 pcph Movement Capacity: 833 pcph 985 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 90.5% 99.7% LEFT TURN FROM. Major Right Leg Major Left Leg Conflicting Flow: 469 vph 330 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1038 pcph 1205 pcph Movement Capacity: 1038 pcph 1205 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 97.2% 99.3% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 96.5% 99.1 % THROUGH FROM. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 820 vph 810 vph Critical Gap: 5.7 seconds 5.7 seconds Headway Gap: 3.3 seconds 3.3 seconds Potential Capacity: 434 pcph 439 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity: 415 pcph 420 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: 97.8% 91.2% LEFT TURN FROM: Minor Bottom Leg Minor Top Leg Conflicting Flow: 815 vph 837 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 6.2 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 3.4 seconds Potential Capacity: 382 pcph 372 pcph ' Major Left,Minor Through,Impedance Factor(p"): 0.87 0.94 Major Left,Minor Through,Adjusted Impedance Factor(p'):0.90 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.90 0.86 Movement Capacity: 344 pcph 320 pcph SHARED LANE CAPA CITY AND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared , Minor Bottom Leg Volume Capacity Capacity I DELAY Level Of Service � X, Left Turn 66 344 499 10.4 C-Normal Delays Ave Delay X.Through 9 415 499 10.4 C-Normal Delays 10.4sec. X Right Turn 79 833 499 10.4 C-Normal Delays , Shared ' Minor Top Leg Volume I Capacity ; Capacity I DELAY I Level Of Service I X Left Turn 76 i 320 353 15.1 C-Normal Delays I Ave Delay X Through 37 420 353 15.1 C-Normal Delays 15.1 sec.I X Right Turn 3 985 353 15.1 C-Normal Delays Major Street Left Turns Volume Capacity DELAY Level Of Service Ave Delay ' X,Major Left Leg 8 1205 3.0 A-Little Delay 0.1 sec. X Major Right Leg 29 1038 3.6 A-Little Delay 0 Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 3.1 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:35 AM HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES F-- Grade= 0% F - 106 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 13 Major Left Leg "--SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 11 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 31 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 1 NO RIGHT TURN I S f S RADIUS<50 ft i 1 16 1 Grade STOP OR YIELD SIGN = I X X SHARED LANES j 9; NOTE:0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. , Saturation Volumes are used -LARGE. i � to calculate Probability of POPULATION fl Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane � is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg - thru I right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 23 1 8 85 12 4 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 31 1 11 106 17 6 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 31 1 13 106 19 6 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 149 vph 31 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 836 pcph 1328 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 - Movement Capacity: 829 pcph 1328 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 32 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1651 pcph Movement Capacity: 1651 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.2% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.2% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes ' Shared Movements Volume Capacity I Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ' X Left From Minor Bottom Leg i 19 829 911 4.1 A-Little Delay Ave Delay i X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 6 1328 911 4.1 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 13 1651 - 1 2.2 A-Little Delay i 0.2 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:37 AM HAGGERTY&ELLIS C:\UNSIG3\HAGGEL.INT - EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES Grade= 0% E-- 85 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 49 Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 29 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE Is S s SNO ACCEL.LANE 37 2 NO RIGHT TURN I RADIUS<50 ft g i 0 NOTE: STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES 0% Saturation Volumes are used LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of POPULATION Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS , Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 22 26 31 68 18 13 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 29 37 44 85 26 19 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 29 37 49 85 28 1 20 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 177 vph 48 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 800 pcph 1299 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.97 - Movement Capacity: 774 pcph 1299 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 66 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1585 pcph Movement Capacity: 1585 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 96.9% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 96.8% SHARED LANE CAPA CITY AND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity' DELAY Level Of Service , X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 28 774 931 4.1 A-Little Delay Ave 4.11s se—ay 4.1-se � X. Right From Minor Bottom Leg 20 1299 931 4.1 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 49 1585 - 2.3 A-Little Delay 10.9 sec-j Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.3 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:36 AM C:\UNSIG3V-iAGGEL.INT HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES E-- Grade= 0% F-- 66 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 3 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 140 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 17 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES I I NOTE: ' 0% I Saturation Volumes are used SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. I to calculate Probability of LARGE POPULATION I ` Queue Free States when the I Major Street Left Turn Lane I I is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 105 12 2 53 6 2 i PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 17 3 66 9 3 I PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 17 3 66 9 3 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 218 vph 149 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 750 pcph 1136 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 1.00 - Movement Capacity: 748 pcph 1136 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 157 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1424 pcph Movement Capacity: 1424 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.8% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.8% SHARED LANE CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes ' Shared Movements ( Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 9 I 748 818 4.5 A-Little Delay Ave Delay 4.5 sec. X_Right From Minor Bottom Leg 1 3 1136 818 4.5 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 3 1424 - 2.5 A- Little Delay 0.1 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:0.3 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.061 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:38 AM C:\UNSIG3\HAGGEL.INT HAGGERTY&ELLIS EXISTING PLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% <-- 66 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 16 Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 140 Major Right Leg ' NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 26 I NO RIGHT TURN ! S i S RADIUS<50 ft i 4 5 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= XI X SHARED LANES 1 ` 3 NOTE: 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Saturation volumes are us :,LARGE to calculate Probability of POPULATION Queue Free States when the i Major Street Left Turn Lane, is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 105 18 10 53 26 34 , PEAK HOUR FACTORS .75 .70 .70 .80 .70 .70 i PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 140 26 14 66 37 49 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES" 140 26 16 66 41 53 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 233 vph 153 vph Critical Gap: 7.4'seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 732 pcph 1129 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.99 - Movement Capacity: 723 pcph 1129 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 166 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1410 pcph Movement Capacity: 1410 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 98.9% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 98.8% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X Indicates shared lanes , Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service i X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 41 723 907 4.4 A- Little Delay Ave Dela X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 53 1129 907 4.4 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 16 1410 - 2.6 A-Little Delay 0.5 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.4 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:42 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.rNT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% E--- 528 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 52 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 639 — Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 181 NO RIGHT TURN S I S RADIUS<50 ft 1 5 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade NO SHARED LANES 7 9 NOTE: SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 3 Saturation Volumes are used _•LARGE { to calculate Probability of POPULATION i I Queue Free States when the i Major Street Left Turn Lane i is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 575 154 38 475 134 43 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 639 181 48 528 158 54 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 639 181 52 528 173 59 CAPACITYANALYSIS ' Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 1305 vph 729 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 134 pcph 524 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.92 - Movement Capacity: 123 pcph 524 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 820 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 651 pcph Movement Capacity: 651 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 92.0% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA ' SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume ( Capacity Capacity DELAY1 Level Of Service . Left From Minor Bottom Leg 173 123 F-Severe Con Ave Delay 282.4 g 212.6 seC.i Right From Minor Bottom Leg 59 524 7.7 B-Short Delays Left From Major Right Leg 52 651 - 6.0 B- Short Delays ! 0.5 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:30.4 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:42 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS-PM , MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane 95th Percentile Queue Lengths groupings-not by movement according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in vehicles per hour. 1 1 7 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes ' 1 1 i i 1 r r r r MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:44 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY ■ EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <— Grade= 0% 534 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 61 Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 652 — Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 181 NO RIGHT TURN I S S RADIUS<50 ft 1 8 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= NO SHARED LANES 7 5 NOTE: 0% 3 Saturation Volumes are used i SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of ,LARGE POPULATION Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane i I is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 587 154 44 481 134 62 i PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 652 181 55 534 158 78 ! PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 652 181 61 534 173 85 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 1332 vph 743 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 128 pcph 514 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.90 - Movement Capacity: 116 pcph 514 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 833 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 641 pcph Movement Capacity: 641 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 90.5% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY1 Level Of Service F-Severe Congestion Ave Dela Left From Minor Bottom Leg 173 116 322.1218.7 sec. _Right From Minor Bottom Leg 85 514 8.4 B- Short Delays Left From Major Right Leg 61 64.1 - 6.2 B-Short Delays i 0.6 sec Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:33.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:44 AM C:\UNSIG3Vv A HAG.INT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-PM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane 95th Percentile Queue Lengths groupings-not by movement according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in vehicles per hour. 7 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes ' MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:41 AM MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES` <-- Grade= 0% F— 407 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 55 Grade= 0% _� Major Right Leg 238 Major Right Leg ' NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 106 NO RIGHT TURN — I S S RADIUS<50 ft 1 2 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade— NO SHARED LANES 5 9 NOTE: 0% SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 1 , Saturation Volumes are used to calculate Probability of _LARGE I I Queue Free States when the POPULATION Major Street Left Turn Lane ' is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg ' VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru I left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 214 90 40 366 117 21 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 238 106 50 407 138 26 i PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 238 106 55 407 151 29 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 747 vph 291 vph Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 324 pcph 940 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.95 - Movement Capacity: 309 pcph 940 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 344 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1143 pcph Movement Capacity: 1143 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 95.2% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA ' SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service D-Lon Delays Ave Delay Left From Minor Bottom Leg 151 309 22.3 g19.4 sec. I Right From Minor Bottom Leg 29 940 4.0 A-Little Delay Left From Major Right Leg 55 1143 - 3.3 A-Little Delay j 0.4 sec. ' Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:3.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:41 AM MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY , EXISTING CONDITIONS-AM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane , 95th Percentile Queue Lengths groupings-not by movement according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in vehicles per hour. �l 2 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:43 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.rNT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) ' Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=45 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES E— Grade= 0% 433 1800 ' (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 88 Major Left Leg EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 244 Major Right Leg ' NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 106 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 1 3 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= NO SHARED LANES 5 7 NOTE: ' 0% 1 Saturation Volumes are used —.LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of POPULATION Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lane ' is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS ' Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru I right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 220 90 64 390 117 27 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .90 .85 .80 .90 .85 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 244 106 80 I 433 138 34 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 244 106 88 433 151 37 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 811 vph 297 vph ' Critical Gap: 7.4 seconds 6.1 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 293 pcph 931 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.92 - ' Movement Capacity: 271 pcph 931 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 350 vph Critical Gap: 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1134 pcph Movement Capacity: 1134 pcph ' Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 92.2% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) NA ' SHARED LANE CAPA CITY AND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume 1 Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service Left From Minor Bottom Leg 151 271 28.9 D-Long Delays Ave Delay � Right From Minor Bottom Leg 37 931 4.0 A-Little Delay 24.0 sec. Left From Major Right Leg I 88 1134 - 3.4 A-Little Delay 0.6 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:4.6 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob ' 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 11:43 AM C:\UNSIG3\MAINHAG.fNT MAIN STREET&HAGGERTY EXISTINGPLUS SITE TRAFFIC-AM MINOR STREET QUEUE LENGTHS NOTE: AND LANE CONFIGURATIONS Queue Lengths are displayed by lane ' 95th Percentile Queue Lengths groupings-not by movement according to the 1994 HCM for a 15 minute counting period based on saturation and capacity in vehicles per hour. ' 3 1 Left and Right movements use Exclusive Lanes HCM Analysis Summary y _ MAIN &c HIGHLAND EXISTING MAINMIGHLAND R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH ' - Analysis Duration: 15 minutes Area Type: Non CBD Lanes i Geometry:Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach I Outbound! Lane 1 i Lane 2 I Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 - EB 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 I TR ; 12.0 WB _- 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 NB 1 1 LTR 16.0 SB I 1 LTR 12.0 East West North South Data L T R L i T R L T R L T R ' Movement Volume(vph) 1 215 127 i 171 312 0 96 0 89 0 0 0 P H F __ 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 ! 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80_' 0.80 0.80_ 0.80_ 0.80 %Heavy Vehicles_ 0 ' 2 1 1 2 0 1 0 I 0 0 - -0 ' Lane Groups - _ L TR i L TR i I LTR - LTR - Arrival Type--_ ----- 3 3 i 3 I 3 3 3 -- RTOR Vol_(vph) - _ --- 50-^ 0 20 0 Peds/Hour _ - 0 0 0 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour --- --- --- --- _ ' Buses/Hour- 0 0 j 0 0 Signal Settings: Semi-Actuated Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec Phase: -- -- 1- -- 2 3 I 4 5 I 6 7 - 8-l--Ped Only-- EB L TP W B L TP j NB LTP ' SB j LTP Green 15.5 14.7 17.8 { 0 Yellow 2.3 2.3 2.3 ' All Red. -_11.7 -- 1.7 1.7 I ----- --- --- Capacity Analysis Results Approach:- ' Lane - - Cap -- - v/s--V - Lane ' v/c I Delay - - Delay App -- Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group Ratio 1 (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB - - - --- -- ----- - L - 528 -_ 0.000 0.258 L 0.002 16.5 B - _ 20.8--_-C ' TR 835 0.107 0.246 TR i 0.437 I 20.8 C - - ----------- t i W B - - -- i • L 523 0.106 - 0.258 L 0.409 20.8 C 20.9 C ' - * TR 869 0.110 0.246 TR ! 0.449 20.9 C - NB *LTR 438 0.139 0.296 LTR 0.470 20.9 C 20.9 C SB LTR 563 0.000 0.296 LTR 0.000 0.0 A 0.0 A 1 Intersection: Delay= 20.8sec/veh Int. LOS=C XC 0.44 *Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.36 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 1 HCM Summary Results MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN l 1/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH • Lane Group i Approach Delay ' i Delay Lane X (sec/ I (sec/ II i App Grp v/s v/c veh) ILOSJ veh) ;LOS4 01 I 0 i 0 I EB I L 0.00 0.00 16.5 i B 20.8 ; C ' TR 0.1 1 0.44 20.81 C �-- 3 12 ---- —- -- ----- --— --- `► - - 171 W B -- L 0.11 i 0.41 20.81 C I 20.9 C TR 0.11 0.45 20.91 C I I 215 -—==----- -. 127 — I NB LTR 0.14 0.47 20.91 C 20.9 C I i _SB .— ---- --- — i i i 1 12 13 -- LTR 0.00 0.00 0.0 i A , 0.0 I A j 15 2 21 is 2 2; 18 2 2, Int. 0.36 0.44 20.81 C * Critical Lane Group SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 , HCM Analysis Summary ' MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH ' Analysis Duration: 15 minutes - Area Type: Non CBD -- -- Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) -Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 ° TR 12.0 ' --WB_- ' 3 _^2 L - 16.0 T _12.0 TR 12.0 NB 1 1 LTR 16.0 ' SB ----,-------I LTR 12.0 1 � I -- ---------- East _ West North South Data _ _ L _ T_ R L T R _ L _T_ R _L_ _T_-__R__ ' Movement Volume h) - 2 552 163 138 491 ' 0 218 - 1 _208 _l-� 3, _4 _ PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 I 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 9/0 Heavy Vehicles -- _0 -- 2 - 1 1 i 2 i 0 1 -0 1 0 - 0 0 ' Lane_Grous- _ -L TR L TR LTR - LTR_Arrival Type - -_-3 3---- 3 3 3 --- - -3 _--- RTOR Vol(vph) --- - -80-------- 0 -- --60--- - - - - -- -0 - - - ' Peds/Hour _ - - 0 - 0 0 _ 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour_ _ --- ' Buses/Hour - 0 0 0 0--- -- Signal Settings_Semi-Actuated- Optimization Analysis- Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec _ - Phase:.-_-.- 1 - -2 --3 -4 S 6 -.- 7 = --8.---__-- Ped Only-- EB L TP j I W B L TP i I NB------------ LTP ---------- SB --------- LTP ; T -- -- Green 10.2 15.9 21.9 0 Yellow ------ 2.3 2.3 1 2.3 All Red 1.7 1.7 1.7 Capacity Analysis Results ' Lane Cap v/s g/C ; Lane v/c i Delay Delay App - Group -- (vph) -- Ratio-- - Ratio - Group Ratio I (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB. - ------ - ------ - -- - -- - { - -- L 347 0.001 0.170 L 0.006 20.7 C 26.5 C ' TR - 918 _ 0.203 0.265 TR 0.768 i 26.5 C WB ---' L_ _- 343 0.076 0.170 L 0.446 26.5 C 22.9 - _C - TR 937 0.154 0.265 TR 0.583 21.8 C , - B 'LTR 536 0.278 0.366 j LTR 0.759 26.4 C 26.4 C LTR_-_ 561 0.005 0.366 LTR 0.014 12.2 B 12.2 B ' Intersection: Delay= 25.Osec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.70 ' Critical Lane Group _(v/s)Crit= 0.56 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 1 HCM Summary Results MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH Lane Group Approach Delay 1 I Delay Lane x i (!see/ (Se., 3 App Grp v/s V/C veh) ILOSI veh) LOST 4 1 EB C 26.5 L 0.00 20.71 C I 0 TR 0.20 0.77 26.5; C 491 -- 138 WB L 0.08 0.45 26.51 C 22.9 C TR 0.15 0.58 I 21.81 C 2 552 163 NB 12181208 LTR 0.28 0.76 1 26.4 C 26.4 C B S -------- 12 LTR 0.01 0.01 12.21 B 12.2 B 10 2 21 16 2 2122 2 2;Int. 0.56 0.70 25.01 C Critical Lane Group SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 i 1 Analysis Summary HCM y MAIN &. HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH ' Analysis Duration: 15 minutes Area Type: Non CBD - Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) -- Approach Outbound' Lane I Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 - _- Lane 6 EB 3 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 ' W B _ 3 _ 2 L 16.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 - -- NB I 1 LTR 16.0 SB- ---_I -.-- 1 LTR 12.0 I East ;_ West North South Data L T R L i T R L T ' R L T R Movement Volume_(vph) 1 215 171 195 I 312 0 } 107 0 95 0 0 0 PHF_ _ 0.80 1 0.80 1 0.80 j 0.80 I 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 j 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80_ %Heavy Vehicles 0 } 2 1 j 1 2 0 I 1 0 I 1 0 0 0 Lane Groups _ L TR L TR i ; LTR - LTR _ Arrival Tye-_ _- 3 3 3 3 j ! 3 3 _ RTOR Vol (vph)- _- 80 0 30 -- 0 ' Peds/Hour 0 0 0 0 Grade 0 j 0 ! 0 0 Parkers/Hour _ --- --- --- _ _ Buses/Hour 0 I 0 0 �0 ' Signal Settings: Semi-Actuated Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 12.0 Sec Phase: _---- -- 1 2 ; 3 4 I 5 6 ; 7 T 8 Ped Only EB _ _ L TP W B -- - --_L TP ----- N B LTP j SB---------- LTP Green 15.8 14.5 17.7 i 0 Yellow- -- 2.3 2.3 2.3 --All Red 1.7 I 1.7 j 1.7 Ca�city Analysis Results - Approach: _ Lane Cap v/s g/C Lane ! v/c i Delay Delay ' App Group_ (vph) Ratio Ratio I Group Ratio T (sec veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB L -_.- 537 V - 0.000 0.263 L } 0.002 16.3 B 21.4 - C TR 818 0.113 0.242 ' TR 0.468 21_4- C WB ' - ------ ' L_- --`532- 0.120 0.263 L j 0.459 21.4 ~C - 21-2 -- C= TR 856 0.110 0.242 TR 0.456 21.1 C -- _-- --� ' LTR 436 0.146 i 0.295 LTR 0.493 21.4 C 21.4 C .S6= - ------ - I - _- - LTR 561 0.000 0.295 I LTR ! 0.000 0.0 A 0.0 A Intersection: Delay= 21.3 sec/veh Int. LOS=C XC 0.47 ' Critical Lane Group >(v/s)Crit= 0.38 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page I -F HCM Summary Results MAIN &c HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN l 1/30/2000 PEAK AM Case: MAINHIGH Lane Group j Approach j Delay Delay j Lane X (sec/ ! ` (sec/ —App —Grp v/s I v/c veh) ILOSI veh) ,LOS 0 OI 0 i EB - ---------- F L, L 0.00 0.00 16.3 ' B ; 21.4 j C * -- 0 TR_-_0_11 0.47 _ 21.4 C ;-- ; w 312 4'14 — 195 WB _ ! *L 0.12 0.46 2.1.4 C 21.2 IC } y 3r TR 0.11 0.46 21.11 C I i �► _ --- I ; 215 j 1� i j 171 NB ---- ..-- ------- - 1__ I LTR -0.15 0.49 21.41 C 21_4 j_C I 1107 95 S B_--------— -- j --- 1 12 3 — ---- LTR 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0.0 A 16 2 2i 15 — 2 2 1 7 _ 2 2 Int. 0.38 i 0.47 j 21.31 C * Critical Lane Group ' SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 ' 1 1 HCM Analysis SummaryY ' MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 1 1/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH 1 - Analysis Duration: 15 minutes Area Type: Non CBD - - Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) - Approach Outbound Lane 1 - Lane 2 - Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 _ 1 - EB_---_32 L 16.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 ^-_---- WB 3 2 L 16.0 T 1 12.0 TR 12.0 NB I I LTR 16.0 SB I 1 LTR 12.0 ' .--_- ---.--_----- East West North ---- South DataL T R L T R L T R L T R 1 Movement Volume(vph)__ __2 552 175 - 144 ^_ 491 0 250 1 220 PH 0.90_ 0.90 0.9.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90_ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ' %Heavy_Vehicles 0 2 _1 1 ^2 _ 0 1 0_ _1 _ _0_Lane Groups _ --L --.TR - L TR -- - _ LTR ---- - - LTR - -- Arrival Tyke _-_- 3 _ 3 _ 3 3 3 - _--`_3 RTOR Vol (vph) --- -_- - 80 -- - _0_ 65 0 ' Peds/Hour 0 0 0 0 %Grade 0 0 0 0 Parkers/Hour _ _ _ --- --- --- _--- 1 Buses/Hour- 0 0 0 ---0- Signal Settings: Semi-Actuated Optimization Analysis Cycle Length: 60.0 Sec Lost Time Per Cycle: 1JO Phase: - -------- 1 - 2 � 3 4 � 5 6 --- 7 `-8 EB L TP I WB LTP NB LTPSB LTP Green 9.5 15.5 22.9 Yellow 2.3 2.3 2.3 ' All Red 1.7 1.7 1.7 Capacity Analysis Results Approach: Lane Cap v/s g/C Lane v/c Delay Delay ' App Group (vph) Ratio Ratio Group --Ratio (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB L 325 0.001 0.159 L 0.006 21.3 C 28.4 C ' * TR 895 0.208 0.259 TR 0.803 28.4 C WB -* L - -- - _ 322 - 0.079 - 0.159 L 0.497 -28.4! C - 23.7_-- -_C_ ' _. _--_TR_---_915 ---0.154 - 0.259 TR 0.597 -22.4 C----_ _-- -_ *LTR 558 0.309 0.382 I LTR 0.808 28.5 C 28.5 C SB LTR 586 0.005 0.382 LTR 0.014 11.5 B 11.5 B ' Intersection: Delay= 26.6sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.74 * Critical Lane Group =(v/s)Crit= 0.60 SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page I HCM Summary Results MAIN & HIGHLAND EXISTING PLUS SITE MAIN/HIGHLAND R MARVIN 11/30/2000 PEAK PM Case: MAINHIGH Lane Group Approach Delay ! 1 Delay i Lane X (sec/ ' (sec/ 3 App Grp —v/s ! v/c i veh) LOST veh) LOS --.._— 4 11 EB L 0.00 0.01 21.3 ' C 28.4 C * _ 0 TR _0.21 `0.80 28.4 C I --- 491 — 144 WB i L 0.08 0.50 28.41 C 23.7 i C TR 0.15 0.60 22.4 j C -- 1 552 : GI i 175 — ! NB I i .-; LTR 0.31 0.81 i 28.5 i C ; 28.5 C 1250 1220 ' � 1 S , S B 2 3 ---------- LTR 0.01 0.01 1 1.5 1 B 11.5 B 10 2 2! 16 2 2 22 2 2 i Int. 0.60 0.74 26.61 C * Critical Lane Group ' SIG/Cinema v2.12 Page 2 '. ' MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 03:43 PM WEST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK AM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL T AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% F— 60 1800 ' (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 33 Major Left Leg rSHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 113 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 99 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 2! 7 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Crime= X X SHARED LANES 81 NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are used SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of _'LARGE f i Queue Free States when the POPULATION , i I Major Street Left Turn Lane ' I is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg ' VOL UME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 90 79 24 48 20 1 5 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 I .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 113 99 30 60 25 6 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 113 99 33 60 28 7 CAPACITYANALYSIS ' Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 252 vph 162 vph ' Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 773 pcph 1157 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.98 - Movement Capacity: 754 pcph 1157 pcph '. LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 211 vph ' Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1368 pcph Movement Capacity: 1368 pcph ' Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 97.6% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 97.5% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service ' A-Little Delay Ave Delay X Left From Minor Bottom Leg � 28 754 810 4.6 y 4.6 sec. I X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 7 1157 810 4.6 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 33 1368 - 2.7 A-Little Delay ( 1.0 sec. ' Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 0.7 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob' 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 03:43 PM WEST APPROACH-ELLIS ' PEAK PM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) ' Y=YIELD CONTROL T AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% E— 61 1800 ' (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg 7 Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 73 Major Right Leg ' NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 26 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 7 2 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES 7 •5 NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are use SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of _LARGE Queue Free States when the POPULATION I , ! Major Street Left Turn Lane is shared. ' Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS , Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 58 21 5 49 56 18 ' PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 26 6 61 70 23 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 26 7 61 77 25 , CAPACITYANALYSIS ' Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 153 vph 86 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds ' Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 874 pcph 1259 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 1.00 - Movement Capacity: 870 pcph 1259 pcph ' LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 99 vph ' Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1542 pcph Movement Capacity: 1542 pcph ' Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.5% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.5% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSERVICEANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements j Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg + 77 870 942 4.3 A-Little Delay Ave , 4.3 sec. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg j 25 1259 942 4.3 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 7 1542 - 2.3 A-Little Delay ; 0.2 Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.7 seconds , 1 ' MARVIN&ASSOCIATES WINUNSIG version 3.Ob 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS November 30,2000 03:45 PM EAST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK AM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOL UMES IN PCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL T AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES F— Grade= 0% E— 69 1800 (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 26 Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 39 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 80 NO RIGHT TURN Is S RADIUS<50 ft STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES 3 NOTE: 0% Saturation Volumes are used - _LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of Queue FreePOPULATION Major StreeSLeft Turne Itates Lane is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru I left right i UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 31 64 19 55 17 5 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 39 80 24 69 21 6 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 39 80 26 69 23 7 CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 171 vph 79 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 855 pcph 1269 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 0.98 - Movement Capacity: 839 pcph 1269 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 119 vph t Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1510 pcph Movement Capacity: 1510 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 98.3% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 98.2% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OF SER VICE ANAL YSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 23 839 911 4.1 A-Little Delay Ave Dela 4.1 sec. X Right From Minor Bottom Leg 7 1269 911 4.1 A-Little Delay X Left From Major Right Leg 26 1510 - 2.4 A-Little Delay 0.7 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection:0.8 seconds MARVIN&ASSOCIATES November 0 2000 03 44 PM' 1994 HCM UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS EAST APPROACH-ELLIS PEAK PM HOUR INTERSECTION GEOMETRY VOLUMES INPCPH S=STOP CONTROL (PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES) Y=YIELD CONTROL AND PREVAILING SPEED=25 MPH SATURATION VOLUMES <-- Grade= 0% F— 10 1800 ' (2 LANES) SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. 7 Major Left Leg SHARED LEFT LANE Major Left Leg Grade= 0% Major Right Leg 73 Major Right Leg NO RIGHT TURN LANE �NO ACCEL.LANE 23 NO RIGHT TURN S S RADIUS<50 ft 61 1 STOP OR YIELD SIGN Grade= X X SHARED LANES 3 9 NOTE: 0% I Saturation Volumes are use'. ^_LARGE SIGHT DISTANCE O.K. to calculate Probability of , POPULATION I Queue Free States when the Major Street Left Turn Lanet is shared. Minor Bottom Leg Minor Bottom Leg VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Major Left Leg Major Right Leg Minor Bottom Leg thru right left thru left right UNADJUSTED VOLUMES 58 18 5 8 46 14 PEAK HOUR FACTORS .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 .80 PHF ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 23 6 10 58 18 PCE ADJUSTED VOLUMES 73 23 7 10 63 19 ' CAPACITYANALYSIS Minor Bottom Leg LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN Conflicting Flow: 100 vph 84 vph Critical Gap: 6.2 seconds 5.3 seconds Headway Gap: 3.4 seconds 2.6 seconds Potential Capacity: 934 pcph 1262 pcph Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements: 1.00 - Movement Capacity: 930 pcph 1262 pcph LEFT TURN FROM Major Right Leg Conflicting Flow: 95 vph Critical Gap: 4.9 seconds Headway Gap: 2.1 seconds Potential Capacity: 1549 pcph Movement Capacity: 1549 pcph Probability of Queue Free State: (exclusive) 99.5% Probability of Queue Free State: (shared) 99.5% SHARED LANE CAPACITYAND LEVEL OFSERVICEANALYSIS X indicates shared lanes Shared Movements Volume I Capacity Capacity DELAY Level Of Service X Left From Minor Bottom Leg 63 930 990 4.0 A-Little Delay 1 Ave Delay 4.0 sec. i X Right From Minor Bottom Leg I 19 1262 990 4.0 A-Little Delay 1 X Left From Major Right Leg 7 1549 - 2.3 A-Little Delay 11.0 sec. Average Total Delay for the entire intersection: 1.8 seconds �' 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION. . . . HIGHLAND BLVD ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . R MARVIN TIME OF ANALYSIS. . . . . PEAK PM DATE OF ANALYSIS. . . . . 12-12-2000 OTHER INFORMATION. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS -------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. . . . . . . . . 1 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) . . . . . . . . . . 40 / 60 LANE WIDTH (FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT. ) . . . 2 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV --- ----- - ----- ----- ----- ----- A 4 3 3 .2 . 81 . 94 . 93 B 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 C 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 D 5 2 . 9 3 . 3 . 81 . 94 . 92 E 5 2 . 9 3 . 3 . 93 . 94 . 92 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 750 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 815 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C A 60 . 03 B 254 . 13 C 546 . 28 D 847 .43 E 2036 . 9 LOS FOR GIVEN CONDITIONS : D 1� 1985 HCM:TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS FACILITY LOCATION. . . . HIGHLAND BLVD ' ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . R MARVIN TIME OF ANALYSIS. . . . . PEAK PM DATE OF ANALYSIS . . . . . 12-12-2000 OTHER INFORMATION. . . ." EXISTING PLUS SITEI A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------ -- - ---- PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF BUSES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES . . . . . . . . . 1 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 �• DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION (UP/DOWN) . . . . . . . . . . 40 / 60 LANE WIDTH (FT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 USABLE SHOULDER WIDTH (AVG. WIDTH IN FT. ) . . . 2 PERCENT NO PASSING ZONES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 B) CORRECTION FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------- --- ROLLING TERRAIN E E E f f f LOS T B R w d HV A 4 3 3 .2 . 81 . 94 . 93 B 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 C 5 3 .4 3 . 9 . 81 . 94 . 91 D 5 2 . 9 3 . 3 . 81 . 94 . 92 E 5 2 . 9 3 . 3 . 93 . 94 . 92 C) LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ------------------------------------------------------------- INPUT VOLUME (vph) : 815 ACTUAL FLOW RATE: 886 SERVICE LOS FLOW RATE V/C- - A 60 . 03 B 254 . 13 C 546 . 28 D 847 .43 E 2036 . 9 1 APPENDIX "C" SPOT SPEED STUDY Page 24 SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Radar) SITE ; HIGHLAND BOULEVARD DIRECTION: NORTHBOUND DATE: 11/03/00 TIME: 10:30 TO 11:30 am SPEED SPEED1 CUMUL, RELATIVE CUMULATIVE RANGE VALUE..:., ..FREQ 20 to 22 22 1 1 0.85% 0.85% 23 to 25 25 2 3 1.71% 2.56 26 to 28 28 4 7 3.42% 5.98% 29 to 31 31 14 21 11.97% 17.95% 32 to 34 34 22 43 18.80% 36.75% 35 to 37 37 24 67 20.51% 57.26% 38 to 40 40 25 92 21.37010 78.63 41 to 43 43 16 108 13.68% 92.31 44 to 46 46 5 113 4.27% 96.58% 47 to 49 49 2 115 1.71% 98.29% 50 to 52 52 0 115 0.00% 98.29% 53 to 55 55 1 116 0.85% 99.15% 56 to 58 58 1 117 0.85% 100.00% 59 to 61 61 0 117 0.00% 100.00% 62 to 64 64 0 117 0.00% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES= 117 MEAN SPEED= 37.46 mph 85TH PERCENTILE = 41.40 mph PACE SPEED= 29 mph TO 38 mph SIGMOID CURVE toox f i� N 9 ui U , W � LLO / I U Z w% /._ W f a lox I j 22- 25 29 31 x 37 /0 u 49 49 92 33 SE 91 SPEED(MILES/HOUR) ►� SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Radar) SITE ; HIGHLAND BOULEVARD DIRECTION: SOUTHBOUND DATE: 11/03/00 TIME: 10:30 TO 11:30 am SPEED... SPEED CUMUL.,` :'RELATIVE . CUMULATIVE RANGE VALUE FREQ FREQ: FREQ(%) FREQ 20 to 22 22 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 23 to 25 25 1 1 0.85% 0.85% 26 to 28 28 4 5 3.42% 4.27% 29 to 31 31 16 21 13.68% 17.95% 32 to 34 34 21 42 17.95% 35.90% 35 to 37 37 30 72 25.64% 61.54% 38 to 40 40 21 93 17.95% 79.49% 41 to 43 43 16 109 13.68% 93.16% 44 to 46 46 3 112 2.56% 95.73% 47 to 49 49 2 114 1.71% 97.44% 50 to 52 52 1 115 0.85% 98.29% 53 to 55 55 2 117 1.71% 100.00% 56 to 58 58 0 117 0.00% 100.00% 59 to 61 61 0 117 0.00% 100.00% 62 to 64 64 0 117 0.00% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES= 117 MEAN SPEED= 37.46 mph 85TH PERCENTILE = 41.21 mph PACE SPEED= 30 mph TO 39 mph SIGMOID CURVE 100% , v) sox .� J > r > eox LL O �l 0 W W a eox 0% 22 25 2a 71 u 37 40 p �a 49 52 as as 61 B< SPEED(MILES/HOUR) i APPENDIX "D" TURN LANE WARRANTS Page 25 ;r - AASHTO Table IX-15. Guide For Left Turn Lane 800 ; 700 600 — 5% LT i > 500 '— ' � � 10% LT SB LT TURN ON HIGHLAND AT ELLIS (� 400 WARRANTED co 15% LTO 300 m � Q u 200 20% LT i i ' ! I 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Opposing Volume I 13.4(2) . INTERSECTIONS AT-GRADE April 1994 120 LUS 100 RIGHT-TURN LANE MAY BE JUSTIFIED 0 80 v - z � o � x w � a 60 O > W cy Z J RIGHT-TURN LANE MAY NOT BE JUSTIFIED . F v x r 40 '1 I • i i 20 1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 TOTAL DHV,VEHICLES PER HOUR,IN ONE DIRECTION Note: For highways with a design speed below 80 km/h with a DHV<300 and where right turns > 40, an adjustment should be used. To read the vertical axis of the chart, subtract 20 from the actual number of right turns. Example i Given: Design Speed 60 km/h DHV = 250 vph Right Turns = 100 vph ; Problem: Determine if a right-turn lane is necessary.. . Solution: To read the vertical axis, use 100 -20 = 80 vph. The'figure Indicates that a right-turn lane is not necessary, unless other factors (e.g., high accident rate) Indicate a lane is needed. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON 2-LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 13.4A NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER A Planned Unit Development Covenants and Architectural Guidelines 1 As din or record ing g 1211512000 See recorded documents for final changes. Prepared and submitted by: John Campbell and Gary Lusin, Owners Bayliss Architects, P.C., Architects C&H Engineering, Civil Engineers NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER COVENANTS AND LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES It is the general intent of this Document to establish the legal authority for and to list the Covenants that pertain to the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision, and to establish the Northern Rockies Professional Center Owners' Association, and the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. ' These Covenants detail howthe properties within the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision are to be developed and maintained. More specifically, the Covenants define how the buildings are to be designed and landscaped, and how the Common Open Space which is within the property is to be used, managed and maintained. When a lot is bought in the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision property, the owner automatically becomes a member of the Northern Rockies Professional Center Owners' Association. This Lot Owners' Association will be run by its members. It is the Association's duty to implement, administrate, and enforce all the Covenants including the maintenance and management of the Common Open Space, Paths and Roads, and to carry on the day-to-day activities of the Lot Owners' Association. There will be an Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee which will be chosen by the Declarant. The Architectural and Landscaping Committee's duty is to, in general, approve or disapprove the building plans brought to it by the individual Lot Owners. �1 3 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES FOR NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER PROPERTY 1 This declaration, made this 15th day of December 2000, by XXXXX or assigns, with principle office in Bozeman, Montana, hereinafter referred to as "declarant". A. WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the following described land in Gallatin, County, Montana: Tract C Certificate of Survey 1177C. B. WHEREAS, Declarant intends to sell, dispose of, divide into lots, and convey .� The real property above described and more specifically described in the final plat of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER, Gallatin County, Montana, and C. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject all of said real property and the lots and subdivisions thereof to protective and restrictive covenants, conditions, restrictions, guidelines and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "Covenants", each and all of which is and are for the benefit of said property, lots and subdivisions and the owners thereof, and shall run with the land applying and binding the present owners and all future owners and successors in interest. D. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish that these Covenants do hereby create the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, publish, and impose upon the Parcel, the following protective and restrictive covenants upon the property which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design, use, and development of the Parcel, and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted as herein mentioned, and said Covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, lot, or division. Said Covenants are as follows. 4 ARTICLE I , DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Lot Owners' Association" or "Association" shall mean the Northern Rockies Professional Center Lot Owners' Association, its successors and assigns. The ` Association may be incorporated as a Montana nonprofit corporation or a Limited Liability Corporation with its members as the lot owners. 1.2 "Member" shall mean any person or entity owning or purchasing a lot in the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision property. Each lot owner shall be a member of the Association and agrees to abide by and be bound by these Covenants, and the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and Resolutions of the Association, if any. I 1.3 "Owner" shall mean the legal title holders, or contract purchasers, whether one or more persons or entities, owning or purchasing a fee simple title to any lot but excluding those having an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation; provided, however, that prior to the first conveyance of each portion of the properties for value, owner shall mean Declarant. 1.4 "Declarant"shall mean XXXXX or assigns, and shall not mean a purchaser of a lot from the Declarant. 1.5 "First President of the Association"or"First President" shall mean the person who has the complete, final, and binding authority over all matters and decisions of the > Association, including but not limited to,the operation hiring, accounting, financing, management, and the operation hiring, accounting, and management of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee or"Committee". The First President of the Association will be either the Declarant himself or a representative of the Declarant, and the First President's position and authority over the Association shall be permanent unless he chooses, in writing, to resign at an earlier time. 1.6 "Architectural and Landscape Review Committee" or"Committee" or A.L.R.C. I� shall mean the Committee appointed by the Declarant whose function is to review and approve or disapprove plans, specifications, designs, landscaping, sites and locations of improvements to be constructed or erected on the property. 1.7 "Declaration" shall mean this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision, and as it may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. 1.8 "Parcel" shall mean all of the real property described and platted as NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision, according to the official 5 subdivision plats thereof filed of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.9 "Property" shall mean a specific part of the Parcel which has a specific zoning designation and use, i.e., Office Use, as shown on the plat of the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision. 1.10 "Project" shall mean the organization, division, improvement, operation and sale of property in NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 1.11 "Lot" shall mean the smallest subdivided unit of land for sale in the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property as shown on the plat for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 1.12 "Common Area" or"Open Space" shall mean all of the Parcel conveyed to the Lot Owner's Association for use by the Association and its Members and the Owners in common. The Common Area shall be the parts of the Parcel within the zoned property which are not specifically owned by individual Lot owners. 1.13 "Open Space Management Plan" shall mean the management plan for the Common Area or Open Space conveyed to the Lot Owner's Association for use by the Association and its Members and the Owners in common. 1.14 "Beneficiary" shall mean a Mortgagee under a Mortgage, as well as a Beneficiary under a Trust Indenture. 1.15 "Mortgage" shall mean a Trust Indenture as well as a Mortgage. 1.16 "Mortgagee" shall mean a Beneficiary under, or holder of, a Trust Indenture as well as a Mortgagee under a Mortgage. 1.17 "Architect" shall mean a person holding a certificate of registration to practice architecture in the State of Montana or any state in the United States. 1.18 "Improvement (s)" shall include,but not exclusively, all building, outbuildings, bridges, roads,paths,pathways, driveways, parking areas, fences, screening walls and barriers, retaining walls, stairs, decks, water lines, sewer lines, springs, ponds, lagoons, ditches, viaducts and electrical, gas and TV distribution facilities hedges; windbreaks, natural and or planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, loading areas and all other structures, installations and landscaping of every type and kind, whether above or below the land surface. 1.19 "Capital Improvement(s)" shall mean an Improvement or two or more interdependent improvements of a substantial nature benefiting the Association, Common Area, which, when undertaken, may reasonably be anticipated to require a projected expenditure by the Association of a total amount greater than $10,000.00. '� 6 1 1.20 "Occupant" shall mean a lessee or licensee of an Owner, or any other person or entity other than the Owner in lawful possession of a Lot or Lots with the permission of the Owner. 1.21 "Record", "recording", "recorded"or"recordation", shall mean, with respect to any document, the recordation of said document, the recordation of said document in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.22 "Developer"or"Building Contractor" shall mean any person or entity buying one or more Lots from the Declarant for the purpose of building office. 1.23 "Office", refer to a specific classification of R-O office buildings as defined in the Bozeman Zone Code. 1.24 "A.L.R.C."is an abbreviation for the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. ARTICLE II AUTHORITY These guidelines shall apply to the subdivision plats for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision as will be recorded at the Gallatin County Courthouse. Declarant hereby declares that the entire Parcel, more particularly described above, is, and shall be, conveyed,hypothecated, encumbered, leased, occupied,built upon or otherwise used, improved, or transferred in whole or in part, subject to this Declaration. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth herein are declared and agreed to be in furtherance of a general plan for the division, improvement and sale of the property and are established for the purpose of enhancing, conserving, and protecting the value, desirability and attractiveness of the property and every part thereof. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions herein shall run with all of the property for all purposes and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Declarant,the Association and all Owners, Occupants, and their successors in interest as set forth in the Declaration. The Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee and the Association is established under the authority of these Restrictive Covenants for the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision property, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Owners' Association of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision and the Montana Non-Profit or L.C.C. Corporation Act. ARTICLE III 7 GENERAL COVENANTS 3.1 Owner's Right to Common Area,Paths and Roads. Every Owner shall have a right to use the Common Areas, Paths, and Roads as shown on the approved final plat of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. The Owner's right to I use the Common Areas,Paths and Roads shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot, subject to the following Provisions: a) The right of the Association to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the Common Areas, Paths, and Roads for the overall benefit of the Association and its members including limitations on the number of guests permitted to use the Common Area and restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including, but not limited to, the use of firearms, fireworks, all motor driven vehicles, loud music, and loud parties in the Common Area or as otherwise specified in the Open Space Management Plan; b) The Open Space Management Plan and any other reasonable restrictions on the use of the Common Areas and Paths shall be enforced and implemented by the president of the Association. c) The right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or any part of its right to the Common Area and Trials to any public agency, authority, utility, person, corporation or other entity for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Association. No such dedication or transfer shall be effective unless approved by sixty seven percent (67%) of the Directors. 3.2 Owners Right to Parking Area. Every Owner shall have a right to use the parking areas. The Owner's right to use the parking areas shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot or building subject to the following provisions: a) Compliance with the Bozeman City Zone Code. b) The right of the Association and the First President to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the parking areas for the overall benefit of the Association and its members including restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including, but not limited to, special sales events, merchandise display stands or tables, signs, fireworks, loud music, and loud parties in the parking area. c) The right of the Association to charge reasonable fees for the disproportionate use by Owners or their clients of the parking area. d) The right of the Association to suspend the voting rights and right to use of the parking areas of any Owner and/or Occupant for any period during which any assessment against his Lot or person remains unpaid and for any infraction of its published rules and regulations for any period of time the Association deems necessary. 3.3 Nuisance. No Owner, guest or invitee may use or occupy the Common Area, Paths, Roads, building, parking area, or any Lot in such a manner as to disturb or interfere with the peaceful use, occupancy or enjoyment of any other Lot or building Owner in the 1 8 subdivision. Violations shall be enforced as provided in paragraph 12.1 of these Covenants. 4 Control and Management. The Association shall have the exclusive right and '3 Co � o obligation to manage, control, and maintain the Common Area, Paths, Roads, and Parking'Areas including but not limited to the layout, design, and installation of any improvements in accordance with these Covenants and the Open Space Management Plan for the Common Area. 3.5 Delegation of Use. Any Owner may delegate, upon notification to the Association, to the members of his immediate family, or contract purchasers who reside on the property,his right of enjoyment to the Common Area, Paths, Roads and facilities. 3.6 Reservation of Easements. The Declarant reserves the right to grant and/or dedicate an easement or easements in any location on, over or across any Road, Parking Area, t Common Area, or Path for water, sewer,natural gas, electrical, fiber optics or cable TV for the installation, maintenance and repair of all such new or existing services and utilities. 3.7 Right of Access. The Association, First President, delegated representatives, or the Declarant shall have the irrevocable right to have access across any Road, Lot(s), Parking Areas, and Common Area to each building or Improvement from time to time during reasonable hours as may be necessary for the inspection, maintenance, repair, or replacement of any Improvements thereon in accordance with Sections 11.1, 11.4, 11.5, and 12.1. Such right of access therefore, shall be for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Committee approval and architectural controls in the subdivision. Except for improvements owned by the Association or used by the Association for its benefit or that of its members, all maintenance, repairs, or replacements on any Lot or on any structure thereon belonging to any Owner shall, as otherwise provided herein, be at the expense of the Owner thereof. A similar right of access shall also be reserved and be immediate for the making of emergency repairs therein in order to prevent property damage or personal injury. All damaged Improvements shall be restored to substantially the same condition in which they existed prior to the damage. All maintenance, repairs, and replacements of the Common Area, Paths, and Improvements shall be the common expense of the Association and all of the Owners; provided however, if such damage is caused by a ' negligent or tortuous act of any Owner, members of his family, his Occupant, agents, employees, invitee(s), or licensee(s), then such Owner shall be responsible and liable for all such damage. 3.8 Underground Utilities. All lines, pipes, wires and all other improvements relating to water, sewer, natural gas, power, cable TV and any-and all other utilities and services must be buried underground except for the Improvements required to be above ground by the provider of the utility service. 3.9 Agricultural uses of neighboring properties. Lot Owners in the subdivision are informed that adjacent uses may be agricultural. Lot owners accept and are aware that 9 standard agricultural and farming practices can result in dust, animal odors, flies,burning and machinery noise. Standard agricultural practices feature the use of heavy equipment, chemical sprays and the use of machinery early in the morning an sometimes late into the evening. IARTICLE IV ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS 4.1 Membership. Every Owner of a Lot or building which is subject to assessment shall be a member of the Association. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of a Lot which is subject to assessment. Membership is automatically transferred on any sale of an Lot to the new Owner, The Declarant shall be the First President of the Association. 4.2 Votin . Within the Association each member shall be entitled to one vote for each Lot owned. It is estimated that there will be approximately eight (8) lots within the property, and therefore a potential for approximately eight (8) votes. When more than one person holds an interest in any Lot or building, Owners shall designate one person to be the agent for receiving notices hereunder, and for the purpose of voting. Each Lot Owner shall be responsible for advising the Association in writing of their current address and the person designated to vote. The Association shall be deemed to have complied with notice requirements and these covenants by mailing notice to the address of the designated Lot Owner which is on file in writing with the Association. The First President of the Association shall have the complete, final, and binding authority over all matters and decisions as necessary to carry out all the purposes of the association, until the total number of votes of the Association members has reached a total of five (5) or more votes, and until all the buildings are built in phase I. At this time the First President will resign, in writing, and relinquish his sole decision making authority over the Association. At this time the Association will elect a new President. The new President will not have the same power the First President had, and he will have only one vote which will be equal to the one vote of any one member of the Association. A new President will be elected annually unless the Association chooses to elect the same President again. But, until such time as the First President resigns his position, if the First President is absent for any reason,then the remaining members of the Association are completely powerless to vote or decide on any issue whatsoever pertaining to the business of the Association. 4.3 Notice and Quorum For Any Authorized Action. During the development and building of the buildings, the presence of the First President is all that is necessary for final decisions to be made and a quorum will not be required. But as in paragraph 4.2, once construction of all buildings is complete and the First President resigns, then meetings shall require the presence of Association members entitled to cast a minimum of sixty six (66%)percent of all votes of the association. The presence of Association members entitled to cast sixty-six (66%)percent of all votes of the Association shall constitute a quorum. 10 4.4 Meetings. There shall be a minimum of two (2) meetings per year called by the First President or subsequent Presidents at a date, time, and place shall be determined by the President. The President of the association has the right to call as many meetings as he/she deems necessary in order to perform all the functions of the Association in an efficient and professional manner. 4.5 Hired Officers and Contractual Agreements. The First President and subsequently the Association shall have the authority to hire additional professional officers or other personnel which they deem necessary for the smooth, efficient, and professional functioning of the Association. It is the general intent of this paragraph that these professional officers or other personnel are hired because they serve some specific , function which is not able to be professionally performed by a regular member of the Association. Although, if one of the Association members is professionally qualified to perform a specific function which the Association needs, then it is permissible for a member to also be hired on this specific professional capacity. Although, these hired M officers or other personnel shall not have a vote, unless they are a member of the Association. They may include, but not be limited to the manager, secretary, treasurer, accountant, and maintenance personnel. The Association shall also have the authority to make contractual arrangements with outside entities, including but not limited to an attorney, accountant, engineer, maintenance contractors, and building contractors to provide for the smooth, efficient, and professional function of the Association. ARTICLE V ASSESSMENTS 5.1 Creation of Lien and Personal Obligation of Assessments The Declarant, for each Lot owned within the properties, hereby covenants and each Owner of any Lot by acceptance of a deed thereof, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association: (1) Annual assessment or charges; (2) Special assessments; Such assessments are to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments shall be in charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees shall be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such property at the time when the assessment fell due. 5.2 Purpose of Assessments. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation,health, safety, and welfare of the Owners of the , property within the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER and the Association and for the improvement, repair, maintenance, and protection of the roads, Common Area, Paths, Parking Areas, Common Areas facilities. As such, these purposes 11 I may also include,but shall not be limited to, funding for: the payment of taxes; the purchase of insurance for the Common Area and risks involving the Association maintenance (including snow removal) of roads,parking areas, utilities, streams, creeks, drainage ditches, ponds, paths, bridges and other improvements or easements owned by the Association or used by the Owners in common: the establishment, maintenance, and protection of pasture lands, crops, streams, creeks, drainage ditches,ponds, lagoons, timber, wildlife and animals within the property; the planting, cultivating, mowing, maintenance, harvesting and cutting of fields, grass, weeds or lands within the property; the construction, maintenance and repair of all Improvements, including buildings, structures, ponds, lagoons, drainage ditches, utilities, recreational facilities owned by the Association and constructed on the Common Area or elsewhere for the benefit of the 1 Association; and the cost of labor, equipment, services, materials, management, protection and supervision of the assets and interests of the Association. 5.3 Annual Assessments. Annual Assessments shall be determined by the Association in an amount estimated to cover the normal operating expenses of the Association for each year as determined in conformity with standard accounting practices, together with such additional amounts as may, in their reasonable judgment, be necessary to cover any past deficits from operations or to create reasonable reserves for the future cost of operations of the Association. Annual assessments shall be apportioned among the individual Lot Owners according to the square footage of the Owner's building. Proximity to the Common Area, percentage of street use, or any other variables which may seem more or less favorable to an individual building Owner will not be valid in the determination of r the annual assessments. 5.4 Siecial Assessments. In addition to an annual assessments to cover the Association's operating expenses, the Association, may levy, in any assessment year, special assessment(s) for the purpose of reserving or paying for, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair or replacement of a Capital Improvement of the Association upon the Common Area and Parking Areas including personal property related there on, and for such other purposes or projects benefiting the Association and its interests provided that any such assessments shall have the assent of two-thirds of the votes of the Association at a meeting called for this purpose. Nothing stated therein shall restrict the right of the Association to provide for the repayment of the special assessment, and upon terms and conditions it deems appropriate, including the collection of interest on the deferred balance. 5.5 Notice and Quorum for Any Action Authorized Under Section 5.4. Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under Section 5.4 of Article V shall be sent to all members not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called, the presence of members entitled to case sixty six percent (66%) of all of the votes of the Directors shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be ' called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meetings shall be one-half of the required quorum at the preceding meeting. No such 12 subsequent meeting shall be held sooner than fifteen (15) days following the preceding meeting. , 5.6 Uniform Rate of Assessment. Both annual and special assessments will be. determined according to the square footage of the Owner's building. However, when in , the judgment of the Association, a Capital Improvement is of a nature that uniquely restores damages or provides value only to certain individual Lot or building Owners then, to the extent determined by the Association that such Improvements are not beneficial to the Association as a whole or to the Owners of Lots or buildings in general, such portion of costs which solely contribute to those certain individual Lots or buildings may be pro-rated, scheduled and assessed among only those Owners of Lots or buildings affected. , 5.7 Date of Commencement of Annual Assessment; Due Date. The annual assessments shall be assessed on a calendar year basis. The first annual assessment shall be adjusted according to the number of months remaining in the calendar year. The Association shall fix the amount of the annual assessment against each Lot or building at least (30) days in advance of each annual assessment period. Written notice of the annual assessment shall be sent to every Owner subject thereto. The due dates shall be established by the Association. The Association shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by the Association President or his representative setting forth whether the assessments on a specific Lot or building have been paid. 5.8 Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association. An ' P Y assessment not paid within thirty(30)days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at a rate of six (6)percentage points above the Prime Rate for Bank Lending in I� New York City. The Association may record a notice of lien against the property and bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the property in the same manner as a mortgage on real property, and the Association shall be entitled in any such actions or foreclosures proceedings to recover its costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his Lot. 5.9 Subordination of Lien to First Mortgage. The lien of the assessments provided for r herein shall not subordinate to the lien of any first mortgage. Sale or transfer of any Lot shall not affect the assessment lien, whether such lien arises prior to such sale or transfer, , or thereafter becomes due. 5.10 Declarant Assessments. For the purpose of assessments, any Lots owned by the Declarant shall be subject to the same assessments and provisions of these Articles as any other Owner. 13 ARTICLE VI ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL 6.1 Intent. The architectural and design Covenants and guidelines which follow are intended to compliment the Bozeman Zoning Code and any future protective covenants which govern this Project, and to clarify the intention for the design of buildings for the Project. Specifically, these guidelines set forth design criteria which addresses the building design and location landscaping, lot density, and other improvements. The intent of these guidelines is to allow as much flexibility as possible while at the same time define a minimum level of quality and consistency of building design which will be consistent with and maximize the quality of the overall Project. The unique design elements of the Developer,Building Contractor, Architect, and Owners for both the landscaping and the buildings will be respected, and individual expression is encouraged, provided they are harmonious with the overall plan of the area and the Project. Except insofar as its duties may be extended with respect to a particular area by the Association, the Committee shall review and approve or disapprove all plans and specifications submitted to it for any proposed improvement. No construction or alteration of any improvement or any work affecting the external appearance of any improvement shall be made, erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain upon the Lot until a site plan, floor plans, elevations, trim details, specifications and landscaping showing the design, location, material(s), and color(s) together with the name of the contractor shall have been submitted to and such site plan and specifications are approved in writing by the Committee. 6.2 Membership of Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. The Committee shall consist of three (3) members appointed by the First President. One (1) of the (3) members of the Committee shall be the First President. The second member shall be representative of the First President, and the third member shall be appointed by the First ' President. It is also suggested that at least one of the members of the Committee have professional qualifications in the area of architecture. In this regard, the First President may, as provided for in paragraph 4.5 of these Covenants, hire an architect to reside on the Committee in lieu of the third member of the Committee. 6.3 Standards For Review. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all proposed construction shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,National Plumbing Code and the National Electrical Code,NEPA, and the Design Guidelines. All plans must be harmonious with the overall plan for the development. All plans, materials and specification must be suitable to the site, adjacent properties and the neighborhood. All improvements must be compatible with the surrounding properties so as to not impair or degrade property or aesthetic values. 6.4 Approval or Disapproval by Architectural and Landscaing Review Committee. The Committee has fifteen (15) days to approve or disapprove the location, construction design, landscaping, and materials used for the building, This fifteen (15) day approval time period will not start until after the detailed site plan, floor plans, roof plans, trim details,project specifications, color samples, sample materials and landscaping plan have 14 all been submitted to the Committee. The Committee will then notify the Owner, in writing, of the date of the start of the fifteen (15) day approval period. If the Committee , feels that insufficient plans, project specifications, color samples, sample materials or landscaping plans have been submitted either by the Lot owner or the Owners representative, then the fifteen (15) day time period will not begin until the Committee informs the Owner, in writing that all plans, samples, and materials provided are acceptable. As a protection to the Owner, if the Owner has been notified in writing by the Committee of the starting date of the fifteen (15) day approval period and the , Committee does not respond with approval or disapproval by the end of the fifteen (15) day approval period,then the approval shall be deemed granted. Any plans, specification, samples, and proposals approved, either expressly in writing or by the expiration of the fifteen (15) day period hereinabove provided, shall then permit the Owner to commence construction in accordance with said plan, but any deviation from said plan which, in the judgment of the Committee, is also; a) a deviation of substance from either the Design Guidelines; b)the requirements of this Declaration; c) a detriment to the appearance of the structure or to the surrounding area shall be promptly corrected to conform with the submitted plan by the Owner or corrected by the Association at the Owner's expense as provided in sections 6.5 and 7.1 of these Covenants. 6.5 Inspection of Work. Upon the completion of any Improvement, if the Committee finds that such work was not done in strict compliance with all approved plans and specifications submitted or required to be submitted for its prior approval, it shall notify the Owner and the Association of such noncompliance, and shall require the Owner to remedy the same. If,upon the expiration of(7) days from the date of such notification, the Owner has failed to commence to remedy such noncompliance, the Association shall determine the nature and extent of noncompliance thereof and the estimated cost of correction or removing the same (this (7) day period does not apply to any case as described in paragraph 11.11 which shall be subject to remedy within 2 hours of the iinfraction). The Association shall notify the Owner in writing of the estimated cost of correction or removal. The Owner shall then only have five (5) days to commence such remedy and thirty (30) days to complete such remedy. If the Owner still does not comply with the Association's ruling within five (5) day period, the Association, at their option, may either remove the non-complying improvement or remedy the non-compliance, and the Owner shall reimburse the Association upon demand for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Association, the Association shall levy an assessment and file a lien against such Owner and the Improvement in question and the land on which the same is situated for' , reimbursement and the same shall be enforced and/or foreclosed upon in the manner provided for by law for mortgages. The Committee may inspect all work in progress and give notice of noncompliance as provided above. 6.6 Design Submittal. It is suggested that the applicant submit a schematic set of drawings for review by the A.L.R.C. While this preliminary submittal is optional, it can , be used by the applicant to determine aspects of the design that might be changed to assure later approval prior to the time and expense of a complete set of Construction Drawings. Following is the minimum Submittal required by the A.L.R.C.: 15 a) Site plans including landscaping, walks and decks. (Scale: 1/8"= IV'or ' similar engineering scale) b) Complete Construction Drawings—At least two (2) sets shall be submitted to the Committee for approval. This includes floor plans, exterior elevations of all sides, roof design, specifications and any construction details. Additional submittal elements may be requested by the Committee for clarification of the design if needed and shall be supplied by the applicant. (Scale '/4"= l'0") c) Samples of all exterior materials with their respective color proposals in an adequate size to evaluate properly. The time allowed for review of the plans will be no longer than fifteen (15) days from the time all design submittal requirements are received by the Committee. The time for plan review shall be adjusted accordingly if plans are Lsubmitted during any holidays. Approval of plan submittal shall require a majority by the Committee. d) A review fee will be required at the time of submission of all the design submittal documents and materials. The Owner shall submit the required design review fee to the Committee. It shall be the duty of the Association to establish the amount of the design review fee. The purpose of the design review fee shall be to defray the Association's cost of review of all proposed site plans and specifications submitted to them. 6.7 Start of Constriction. There shall be no construction work initiated without a building permit issued by the City of Bozeman and without written approval of the plans by the Committee. All building construction and landscaping must conform to both the final approved plans by the City of Bozeman and the Committee. If the Owner does not intend to start construction within three (3)months of purchasing the Lot, then permission in writing will need to be obtained from the Committee to suspend construction of their building until some future date. The Owner will be required to submit in writing a Lot maintenance program that is acceptable to the Committee. Such a program will minimally include but is not limited to killing and removing all existing weeds on the Lot, finish grading the lot if deemed necessary by the Committee,planting an acceptable seeding program as a new ground cover, providing a mowing maintenance schedule, mowing Lot in accordance to the maintenance schedule, and otherwise keeping the Lot in an attractive and presentable condition at all times. Storage of anything on the ' Lot during this time is completely forbidden. 6.8 Completion. All work on any improvement in the NORTHERN ROCKIES ' PROFESSIONAL CENTER property must be complete wotjom twelve (12) months of the date of commencement unless the Committee in writing agrees to an extension. 16 ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1 Enforcement. Violation by an Owner, Occupant, Licensee, Architect, or representative of the Owner of any restrictions, conditions, covenants or agreements herein contained shall give the Association, with reasonable notice, the right to enter upon the property concerned, and to summarily abate and remove at the expense of the Owner any erection, thing, or condition that may be in, or upon, said Lot, building, Common Area, road or right of ways contrary to the provisions hereof without being deemed guilty of trespass. The result of every act or omission whereby ant restrictions, condition, covenant, or agreement is violated in whole, or in part, is hereby declared to be and constitute a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law against a nuisance, either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result. The Association, or any Owner, shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity,all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, fines and charges now or hereafter imposed. Failure by the Association or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. 7.2 Costs of Enforcement. Should any lawsuit or other legal proceeding be instituted by the Association against an Owner alleged to have violated one or more of ' the provisions of this Declaration and should the Association be wholly or partially successful in such proceeding, the offending Owner shall be obligated to pay the costs of such proceeding, including reasonable attorney's fees at both the trial and appellate level. 7.3 Severability. Invalidation of any of these covenants or restrictions by legal , judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. 7.4 Amendment. Except those provisions requiring a greater consent, any provision herein may be amended or revoked and additional provisions added, at any time by a written instrument recorded in the office of Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin , County, Montana, duly signed and acknowledged by the Owners or record of not less than eighty(80) percent of the Lots subject to this Declaration. 7.5 Term. The provisions of this Declaration shall be binding for a term of , twenty five (25) years from the date of this Declaration, after which time the Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years not to exceed three (3) such extensions unless an instrument agreeing to amend, revoke or terminate this Declaration has been signed by the Owner's of eighty (80)percent of the Lots has been recorded. 17 7.6 Non-liability of Committee Members. Neither the Committee nor any ' member thereof, nor the Association nor any member thereof shall be liable to the Association or to any Owner or to any other person of any loss, damage or injury arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of the Committee's or the Association's respective duties under this Declaration unless such loss, damage or injury is due to the willful misconduct of the Committee or its members or of the Association or its members. 7.7 Reservation of Authority. Notwithstanding anything contained therein to the contrary, the Declarant hereby reserves all rights and authorities granted to him in this declaration, to the Association and to the Committee until such time as the Declarant waives such reservation of rights in a writing recorded at the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder's office. . ARTICLE VIII ' SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICTS 8.1 Waiver Of Protest to Future S.I.D.W. All Owners of Buildings will be required to sign waivers of protest on all future S.I.D.(s) which the City of Bozeman may require them to participate in. ARTICLE IX BUILDING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT 9.1 Intent of Design Criteria. The primary goal is to ensure that the proposed Project design including landscaping maintains or exceeds the general level of quality, size, appearance, and marketability. All initial or subsequent improvements to the privately owned Lots shall be subject to the following architectural and landscaping requirements and guidelines. Approval by the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER and Landscape review Committee shall be obtained prior to application to the City of Bozeman for a building permit. The submittal requirements for review by the A.L.R.C. are specified herein. The A.L.R.C. shall have no power to approve any structure failing to meet, at a minimum, the conditions set forth in this Declaration. 9.2 General Regulations. All lands within the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER are subject to the zoning regulations of the City of Bozeman except for any variances thereto granted by the City of Bozeman as shown on the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER plat as filed in the Gallatin County ' Courthouse on . As such variances to the zoning requirements of the City of Bozeman shall be specified on the final plat noted above or within the body of this Declaration. In addition to these Regulations,building design may be regulated by City, County, State and Federal regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. The Owner or his or her agent shall be responsible to ensure conformance with any applicable regulations and 18 should check with the Cityof Bozeman Gallatin Count and State of Montana Building � Y, g Codes Division to verify that the most recently adopted edition of any applicable regulation is being used. No construction of, or alteration to, any improvements, whether temporary or permanent, including but not necessarily limited to buildings, fences, walls, earthwork, paving, vegetation, signs, or secondary structures such as utility or trash enclosure, antennas and storage tanks shall be commenced on any lot prior to receiving the written approval of the A.L.R.C. and the City of Bozeman. Interior modification and/or improvements that do not alter the exterior ' appearance of a building, or the site improvements, shall not require the approval of the A.L.R.C. Although an Owner is responsible to check with the City of Bozeman to see if such interior modification and/or improvements requires their approval. 9.3 Density, Allowable Uses, Allowable Areas and Setbacks. a.) Density. The density of the NRPC P.U.D. shall be as follows: Overall land coverage by principal and accessory buildings shall not be more than 60 percent for commercial uses. The percentage of coverage is based on the total project, as the parking areas and open space are common area and not part of the lot as in a conventional subdivision. b.) Permitted Uses. Permitted Uses shall be as follows: principal uses: Essential services (Type I, see Bozeman Zone Code for definition) Medical Offices, clinics, and centers Offices (professional offices and business headquarters) Conditional Uses: ' Day Care Centers Accessory Uses: Fences Tool sheds for storage of domestic supplies Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses. r Signs, subjects to Chapter 18.65 pf the Bozeman Zoning Board Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work Parking areas C) Building Envelope or Buildable Area. Each lot in NRPC the building , envelope determined on the site plan. All construction other than landscaping improvements shall be limited to this buildable area. The building will be subject , to additional requirements elsewhere in this document. D) Building Setbacks. All buildings or structures shall have a setback shown on the site plan. Note that setbacks are created by the common open space of the P.U.D. and that the buildable area is defined by the lot and the landscape strip shown on the Final site plan. Additionally, a minimum 10' separation must occur between individual buildings , 19 on adjoining lots. Therefore, each building on adjoining lots must maintain a 5' setback from the adjoining lot. ' 9.4 Height Limits. Maximum roof heights will be 38' with roof pitches of 3/12 or greater and 32' for buildings with flat roofs or with roof pitches of less than 3/12. Measurement of building height shall be in the same manner as specified by the Bozeman Zone Code. 9.5 Minimum and Maximum Building Sizes. a) Minimum. 2400 Square Feet. b) Maximum. Limited by the parking calculations for square footages as set forth in this ' document allocating maximum square footage for the number of parking places provided for each lot and the maximum building coverage as set forth in section 9.3 a (above). 9.6 Buildings on Multiple Lots. A single building may be constructed on contiguous lots, but may not use more the 2 lots unless approved by the A.L.R.C. and the City of Bozeman's Design Review Board as having adequate massing delineation to address the increased linearity of the building. 9.7 Master Sims eg_Plan. The signage plan for the P.U.D. incorporates 3 main elements. They are as follows: Planned Unit Development Identification Signs. These 3 signs are located at the 3 main entrances to the Development, located off Ellis Road. The locations are noted on the Final site plan and details are shown. Building Identification Signs. These signs are located on the interior street. The locations are noted on the Final site plan and details are shown. The information on the signs will be limited to the name of the building complex and the number range of the units serviced by that entrance. Unit Identification Signs. These would be individual signs for each unit within the buildings showing the name of the particular business and the number of the unit. An example would be: Smith, Smith and Smith, C.P.A.'s, 404 Northern Rockies Drive. The wall signs for each unit will comply with the formulas set forth in Section 18.65 of the Bozeman Area sign code dated June 15, 2000. All signs must be approved by the A.L.R.C. and receive a permit from the City of Bozeman. ' 20 ARTICLE X BUILDING GUIDELINES , 10.1 Intent and Design Theme. The intent of the following Building Guidelines is to provide for a degree of continuity throughout the built-up setting of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER without stifling personal taste in choice of building style. Furthermore, the intent is to establish minimum standards to ensure that the type of building constructed is at least comparable to and blends with the eclectic styles of architecture found in the surrounding developments. The purpose of the design theme is to produce functional and cost effective structures that have a light commercial with residential accents character, including protected entrances, varying roof lines (including multiple roofs and dormers), exterior spaces such as decks. 10.2 Design Concepts. a) Articulation of main entrances. Each building shall have a clearly defined main entrance that is articulated by roof and building massing as well as landscaped design elements such as sidewalks, planting, lighting elements, etc. b) Orientation of buildings. Each building shall be oriented to the parking area provided for it in terms of egress and ingress. The building may be additionally oriented to views or to adjacent buildings for purposes of pedestrian circulation between buildings. Each building should be particularly sensitive to the pedestrian traffic between ' buildings and parking and relate well to the sidewalk required along the building side of the parking lots and shown on the Final P.U.D. plan. c Scale and Massingof Buildings. Each building design must address the scale ' g g � and massing not only of the particular building itself but also of adjacent buildings within the P.U.D. Each building will be reviewed by the A.L.R.C. on this basis. 10.3 Roofs. Roofs are a major element in the building. design and therefore will be emphasized by the A.L.R.C. a) Shape and Form. It is the intention of these guidelines to require traditional gable, hip, and shed roof designs used in creative and aesthetically pleasing combinations. Potential flat roofs may be accepted by the A.L.R.C. Secondary roof forms are highly recommended in designs for NORTHERN ROCKIES , PROFESSIONAL CENTER. These are particularly useful to give proper scale to large roof masses. They can be particularly effective when special care is given to their , massing and pattern. In addition, no roof ridgeline shall extend more than forty(40) feet without , interruption by an intersecting roofline, secondary roof structure, or step down roof in order to break up the overall mass. 21 r I 1 ROOF ARTICULATION ' MEASUREMENT CRITERIA b) Pitches. The minimum roof pitch shall be 5:12 for the major components of any roof. Minor components and secondary roof structures, such as shed roofs and dormer roofs may have pitches as low as 4:12. No component of any roof shall have a pitch less than 4:12. Under certain special circumstances the roof design may incorporate as a minor component of the overall roof design a flat roof. Should the applicant demonstrate that a lesser pitch on the major components can achieve the desired results of these guidelines, the committee may approve the design solely at their discretion. However, the applicant will in that case be required to provide a conceptual submittal as described in the submittal requirement section of this document. c) Secondary Roof Structures. Dormers, skylights, chimneys and solar collectors are considered secondary roof structures. Dormers and most other secondary roof structures are encouraged, both to add interest and scale to major roof areas and to make habitable use of space within the roofs. Dormers and other secondary roofs may have gable, hip or shed forms and may be stacked in multiple forms. When designing the location of skylights, consideration should be given to both the interior and exterior appearance of the unit. Locations should also be coordinated with window and door locations. Skylights shall be located away from valleys, ridges and all other areas where drifting snow and snow ice may hinder the performance and safety of the unit. d) Eves, Soffits, and Fascias. All major roof components shall have a minimum horizontal eve projection of 18 inches measured from the finished wall. Minor roof structures may have a reduced eve projection as necessary to maintain proper proportion or for a specific architectural effect demonstrated to the Committee. Eves may have a ' horizontal or angled return to the wall. Soffits shall be required to cover all rafter tails and rough framing material except where framing members are finished and protected from exposure. All roof edges shall have a minimum facia of 6 inches in height. For 1 further illustration see drawing below. 10.4 Roofing Materials. Roofing materials enhance the building and need to be compatible with a residential neighborhood. The recommended roofing materials are natural cedar shakes or shingles, heavy gauge, high quality metal, or fiberglass composition shingles in an architectural grade. Other materials may also be considered, but must have written approval from the A.L.R.C. 10.5 Gutters, Downspouts, and Flashing. Gutters and downspouts are allowed but they must be of a color and finish that blends with the finish colors of the structure. Unpainted gutters, downspouts or flashing will not be allowed unless made of copper. Flashing materials shall be of a copper or painted or anodized sheet metal. ' 22 10.6 Equipment and Ventilating Roof Projections. All roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into the overall roof design and screened. All roof mounted HVAC equipment ' will be screened from view with an architectural element consistent with the design of the building and oriented away from the street side of the building. All sewer, bath fan,hot water heater, stove, or other roof venting stacks shall be painted a color as similar as possible to the roof material color. Other non-roof mounted equipment shall likewise be screened from view either with architectural elements such as approved fencing or with the use of landscaping. 10.7 Exterior Walls. The exterior walls are one of the most important aesthetic elements on the building design and will reflect the image of the entire subdivision. Elements of specific concern are scale,proportion, texture and color. The scale and proportion of the exterior walls must have inherent interest and diversity, and harmonized with the high quality nature of the P.U.D. All buildings will be of new construction and there will be no log, manufactured, mobile, pre-assembled, or modular buildings allowed. a) Material. The materials that are acceptable to provide the desired look and textures are real stone and brick, wood beams and siding which is painted or stained, and stucco. Color lock and vinyl siding may be acceptable provided it is of high quality and simulates wood materials faithfully, and the specific brand is approved by the A.L.R.C. Steel or aluminum siding, unless specifically approved by committee, standard usages of plywood siding, such as T1-11, and unnatural appearing simulated stone,brick or wood are unacceptable. Some simulated stone may be acceptable with approval by the A.L.R.C. The Committee will consider new building materials on the market that maintain the aesthetic character of the subdivision. b) Colors. The colors used must be muted earth tones and must also be considered to harmonize and compliment the surrounding site and neighboring buildings. Trim colors should demonstrate only subtle color changes from the main body of the building, unless demonstrated to the A.L.R.C. to be compatible with the character of the PUD. If the applicant can demonstrate to the A.L.R.C. that brighter trim and accent colors can meet ' the spirit of this document without detracting from the overall development, then the A.L.R.C. has the option of approving the proposed color scheme solely at their discretion. , c) Concrete. Exposed concrete shall be limited to a maximum of 8 inches from the bottom of the siding to the finish grade. Exposures of more than 8 inches shall be ' covered by shrubs, masonry veneer, and texture concrete surface such as exposed aggregate or synthetic stucco. d) Wall Form. No wall shall consist of a single finish treatment for more than 28 horizontal feet without interruption by a wall projection. Window, wall comer, wall recess, porch or other architectural form that adds interest. ' 23 ' r ' All windows shall be of double or triple glazing. Low"E"coatings are permitted but nomirror glazing shall not be allowed. All windows and sliding glass,French or atrium doors shall be aluminum clad wood. A specific brand of plastic windows may be approved by the Committee, but a sample will need to be produced to the Committee. Unclad custom-built windows for individual applications shall be trimmed and painted to appear the same as the other windows in the structure. The patterns, sizing, symmetry(or asymmetry) of windows and doors determines the scale and feel of the building. The Committee will require that the following aspects be carefully addressed in the window and door design. 1) Consistency of types and shapes. 2) Special shapes used for"feature"windows in appropriate areas. 3) Use of window patterns consistent with the design and massing of the structure. 4) Consistent use of window forms in conjunction with adjacent window forms. 10.8 Parking. Each building is required to have the number of parking spaces required by the City of Bozeman Zoning Code. There will be absolutely no parking of cars, trucks, or any other vehicles in the street by Owners. Parking cars over-night in the parking areas is forbidden, except for those buildings with residential use. ARTICLE XI SITE DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES All site improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER A.L.R.C. prior to commencement of construction or alteration. Minor adjustments to the building and landscaping after initial construction shall not require submittal of plans. Minor adjustments shall include replacement of dead or dying vegetation and the addition of trees, shrubs or other landscaping features providing that such additions are consistent with the Site Development and Landscape Guidelines. 11.1 Driveway Culverts. All driveways and parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. Driveway culverts shall have attached flared ends of sheet metal or concrete construction. Culvert ends, not counting the flared ends, shall extend a minimum of 4 ' feet beyond the edge of the driveway. All culverts damaged by construction shall be replaced prior to final surfacing of the driveway. 11.2 Fences. One of the primary goals of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER is to create an atmosphere that is open and expansive. Because of the importance of this goal,perimeter lot fencing will not be allowed in this subdivision. Fencing for screening of loading areas and mechanical equipment should be only as high as necessary to screen the area or equipment in question, and will in no instance exceed 6' in height unless specifically approved in writing by the A.L.R.C. r 24 11.3 Privacy Screening. Privacy screens will be allowed but must be constructed of wood siding (same as the main building), stucco,brick, or stone materials, and they shall ' be an integrated part of the main buildings. There shall be a size restriction. Plans for privacy screening must be submitted and approved by the A.L.R.C. 11.4 Exterior Lighting. While lighting for safety and security is encouraged, the elimination of excessive light is of prime concern. All lighting for parking and driving ' areas shall be fully shielded as shown in the following example, and in no case shall exceed 20' in height. Additionally, all lighting for the buildings and walk areas shall be concealed or recessed into the structure where possible. Also,where wall mounted fixtures or ballard type lighting for pedestrian circulation areas are required, all lighting will be of a type that has the luminaire of the fixture shielded from view from any angle with the exception of the area intended to be illuminated. In no case shall lighting be of a type that is not consistent with light commercial development. , Lighting for signage shall be limited to landscape type lighting. In cases where internal lighting of signs is required, the translucent lighted portion shall be the letters only and the background shall be dark. Only enough light shall come through the background to give a sense of the background color. 11.5 Utilities. All utilities including,but not limited to, natural gas, electricity, telephone, fiber optics, and cable TV shall be located underground. 11.6 Mail Boxes. Mailboxes shall be designed in accordance with the U.S. Postal Service regulations and approved by the local Postmaster as shown on the site plan. , 11.7 Temporary Structures. No temporary structures, trailers, campers, motor buildings, tents, shacks, or similar structures shall be used at any time on the lot. 11.8 Construction Material: Clean up and Debris. A list of acceptable procedures and , guidelines will be given to the Owner prior to actual construction commencing and will require the written acceptance of compliance by the Owner prior to starting construction or construction will not be approved. Construction materials shall not at any time prior to or during construction be placed or stored in the street or placed anywhere else so as to impede, obstruct or interfere with pedestrians within the street right of way. Absolutely all construction materials shall be removed from the entire Lot within thirty(30) days of substantial completion of construction. Construction sites shall be kept clean, neat and well organized at all times. Any construction debris shall be the responsibility of the Building Contractor and Owner and shall be kept clean and properly stored on a daily basis. If construction debris blows onto another Owners lot it is the responsibility of the Owner's contractor to clean it up immediately. Of particular concern to the Declarant is street cleanliness. Any 25 r - ' construction debris, and especially dirt, gravel,rocks, and concrete which find their way into the street, shall be removed immediately(within 60 minutes of the start of the 1 infraction) from the street and be brought back to a broom clean condition or clean up costs and a fine may be levied and enforced as in Sections 6.5 and 7.1 of this Declaration. Owners are highly encouraged to notify their building contractors of this important condition prior to signing their construction contract with them. 11.9 Solid Waste Containers. Dumpster enclosures shall be designed in the same style as the main buildings. If the enclosure is designed to match the building(s) served, it shall be approved in writing by the A.L.R.C. All enclosures shall have an impervious ' floor. All solid waste containers must be stored in their enclosures except during reasonable periods prior to and after pickup, and only on day of pickup. 11.10 Signs. Signs shall not be permitted on the private, public, or commonly owned lands within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER except as follows: ' Signs shall comply to the Master sign plan addressed in section 9.7. 11.11 Landscaping. Landscaping will be required to enhance the value of the property and the aesthetics of the site. The entire site shall be landscaped, including up to the actual edge of the road, and all owners are required to maintain their grounds. Landscape, grading and irrigation plans shall be submitted and approved by the Committee concurrently with all structural building plans. In locating bushes and trees consideration must be given to surrounding neighbors concerning view corridors and sun penetration to their site. Rock and Gravel type ground covers will not be allowed as landscaping. Certain types of gravel and rock ground covers will be allowed for certain specific non-landscaping uses. All such uses must be approved by the Committee. This limitation does not apply to specific large rocks or rock clusters being used in an artistic manner. Owners shall maintain the transition from the formal landscaping around the buildings and the Open Space areas will be maintained to a lesser degree according to the Open Space Management Plan. Where lawn is planted, an underground sprinkler system will be required. ' 11.12 Landscaping Maintenance. Lawns and landscaping shall be maintained in a manner which shall not detract from the appearance and value of adjoining Lots or diminish the aesthetics of the subdivision. Infractions will be dealt with as defined in ' paragraphs 6.5 and 7.1 of these Covenants. 11.13 Landscaping Requirements for Individual Buildings. Each proposed building will provide a landscape plan for the review committee of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owner's Association. This plan will show all foundation and perimeter plantings, irrigation system plans, sidewalks, and other landscape elements. For every 3 linear feet of foundation wall, the owner will be required to provide and plant as a minimum 1 small ornamental tree, 1 evergreen shrub, or 1 deciduous shrub as defined in the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This landscape plan r 26 will be designed to soften the transition between the building and the landscaped lot and , i� g P will be consistent with the approved landscape plan of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER. ' There will be a minimum of 6 trees required per Lot, and all trees will be a minimum of ten (10') feet in height. Trees are encouraged to be planted in clusters rather than in regular intervals around the property. Shrubs and flowers can be used to provide a transitional mass from the tree clusters to the lawn surfaces. Deciduous trees and shrubs ' can be placed on the southern and western sides to provide shade in the summer months and allow sun to penetrate in the winter months. Suggested deciduous trees are Aspen, European Green Birch, Rocky Mountain and Big Tooth Maple, and others recommended by the City of Bozeman Code. Suggested evergreen trees are Douglas Fir, Lodge Pole Pine, Engleman, and White Spruce, Subalpine Fir and Scotch Pine. Additionally for each building built directly adjacent to another building, the landscape plan shall denote 1 large canopy tree for every 30' of adjacency. In the event that a large tree is inappropriate, 2 small ornamental trees may be substituted. Definitions for plantings will be from the Bozeman Zoning Code. , Each building will be required to provide a substantial landscape strip-between the building and the sidewalk along the parking. In no case shall the width-be less than 4 feet, with the exception of those places where the sidewalk abuts-the entfances. Each building will provide a bicycle rack consistent with the following-detail-or`an alternate design approved by the A.L.R.C. ' 11.14 Numbering System of Buildings. 1 27 r ARTICLE XII OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN 12.1 Intent. This declaration provides the authority for this Open Space Management Plan through the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision Lot Owners Association. The intent of the Open Space Management Plan is to provide for the management, maintenance, implementation, and protection of the Common Open ' Space within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property. The intent of the Open Spaces is to provide: a) a general feeling of openness ' b) a buffer zone between lot clusters, c) corridors for paths The following Open Space management standards apply to the Open Space lands in the property within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 12.2 Open Space. The project has 3 levels of space: Public Space, constituted by the roads and pedestrian system. Private Space, constituted by the lots and buildings within the P.U.D., and those areas immediately adjacent to buildings not served by elements such as pedestrian facilities or recreational elements such as benches or picnic tables. ' Semi-Public Spaces, such as parking lots, which are intended for the users of the offices within the P.U.D. as well as their guests. 12.3 Landscaping. Landscaping plantings shall feature native species but may incorporate non-native and ornamental species of trees and shrubs. The dominant theme ' for landscaping shall be large open grassy areas with clusters of trees, to create visual backdrops and vegetated islands requiring little maintenance. 12.4 Maintenance Practices. The president shall determine frequency and schedule of all open space maintenance practices. ' 12.5 Noxious Weeds. Noxious weeds shall be controlled on all common open space areas. The preferred method is by introduction of desirable plant species that eliminate weeds. Interim measures permitted include herbicide applications,mowing and biological control. All herbicide applications shall be conducted according to applicable State laws. 12.6 Animal Control. Domestic pets shall not be allowed at any time in the open space areas or paths unless on a leash. ' Temporary fencing around shrubs and trees to prevent animal depredation shall be permitted for the period of time necessary to ensure survival of the plantings. 1 28 Rodents may be controlled if levels of depredation threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. If poisons are used they shall be applied only n accordance with applicable State laws. ' Pesticides may be used to control insect populations that are a nuisance, threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. Pesticides may be applied only in accordance with applicable State laws. 12.7 Additional Restrictions. , a) All buildings shall be prohibited in the common open space areas except structures related to the function and intent of the common areas. b) Motorized vehicles are prohibited within the common open space areas except ' for maintenance and construction of landscaping, facilities or structures related to the function or intent of the open spaces. c) No open burning of privately generated debris shall be permitted on commonly held open spaces. Open burning of debris generated from the commonly held spaces may be allowed in accordance with local burning regulations, but only by someone authorized by the Board. Individual lot owners shall not be allowed to burn in either their private property or in the common open spaces. 12.8 Road and Sidewalk Management Plan. The intent of this section is to NORTHERN ' ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owners Association to establish a maintenance plan for the commonly owned vehicular and pedestrian facilities within the subdivision. The purpose of the management plan shall be to provide for the long term maintenance, reconstruction and replacement of all street and sidewalk surfaces located in the common area in the subdivision. ' The Association shall accept ownership and maintenance of all streets and sidewalks when constructed to the standards approved on the final plat for the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. The ' NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owners Association shall have no authority, duty or right to obstruct, delay or harass the Declarant in regards to additions to or extensions of streets or sidewalks that are approved by the City of Bozeman. The Association, acting for the Association, shall establish a plan for long term maintenance of all roads and sidewalks. The Association shall also establish a plan , for the day to day maintenance of the roads and sidewalks. In accordance with such plans, the Association shall see to it that the sidewalks and roads are maintained, cleaned and snowplowed in a timely fashion. The Association shall hire contract services for road, sidewalk and driveway maintenance. ' The Association shall have the authority to assess the Lot Owners for services rendered in maintaining and repairing all streets and sidewalks as specified in Article 5, titled Assessments. , 29 �; -4 IIIour SRI* IOW NOON go Lot lWay IMoll , Ianon, 03 "16A Wn 41— Ib—'s Wo '1190WITI, A 1,lost IIus logo"010 oil so-,Ison"Wow nvow -""son amm NMI I-owe Tom ova mitt 0, A-1, a. ply,, V ism 10 soya FoAs AW"MOAKI ann" A, On 09- mom WX ja Too SAAK?&W Ado "All Imoo Iit...... Qoo,nN M 0 Igoo IfwAs Una" Ism ell an is&% I"Mown Q Ojos--sawls WAY10 Awl look-,xj WE nos tons yawt WAS PAT J� OW to too I Iinnet W lank njj so AU Von OF I Itest 4 RON onto VT -top dA,am Igkof-1 Inv "cut owns"Wits, "LOIN 200 low, arover uvx_�O noun, >,,won Oita.,a my's"Son Am owe EMT us xW104fy", ,, - 00% THAA Ann i—OWN AM IME -4- ism 1W afzvw;W�- -oil qy-v-MIR Noo-IN wpm two&Now inNo 0, QQW VOW, Lk'-Ito NINO f xm"7 "R wow,-ova Too;Vona "Q11WITe.6 onah"_log: T2KQAW3A_ H wow WAS OWES" V nvasex K P1 Ann An AS T-ne OMKIN"A NICK Annisim"613 INC :"11501�10?n - 11,RUN A 0, res,also=W074 o "was 171 5 too.a one—II05 037261 come AV 0 c 1 *JZ__a A=z comma V ivy Q Sho-,""O. :4 AMEN,04 RON ; : ................ MAI CITY PLANNING NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER A Planned Unit Development Covenants and Architectural Guidelines i As submitted for recording 111912001 See recorded documents for final changes. Prepared and submitted by: John Campbell and Gary Lusin, Owners Bayliss Architects, P.C., Architects C&H Engineering, Civil Engineers f� I P i ?pi �y NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER COVENANTS AND LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES It is the general intent of this Document to establish the legal authority for and to list the Covenants that pertain to the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision, and to establish the Northern Rockies Professional Center Owners' Association, and the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. These Covenants detail how the properties within the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision are to be developed and maintained. More specifically, the Covenants define how the buildings are to be designed and landscaped, and how the Common Open Space which is within the property is to be used, managed and maintained. When a lot is bought in the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision property, the owner automatically becomes a member of the Northern Rockies Professional Center Owners' Association. This Lot Owners' Association will be run by its members. It is the Association's duty to implement, administrate, and enforce all the Covenants including the maintenance and management of the Common Open Space, Paths and Roads, and to carry on the day-to-day activities of the Lot Owners' Association. There will be an Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee which will be chosen by the Declarant. The Architectural and Landscaping Committee's duty is to, in general, approve or disapprove the building plans brought to it by the individual Lot Owners. 1 r • • DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES FOR NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER PROPERTY This declaration, made this 151h day of December 2000, by XXXXX or assigns, with principle office in Bozeman, Montana,hereinafter referred to as "declarant". A. WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of the following described land in Gallatin, County, Montana: Tract C Certificate of Survey 1177C. B. WHEREAS, Declarant intends to sell, dispose of, divide into lots, and convey The real property above described and more specifically described in the final plat of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER, Gallatin County, Montana, and C. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject all of said real property and the lots and subdivisions thereof to protective and restrictive covenants, conditions, restrictions, guidelines and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "Covenants", each and all of which is and are for the benefit of said property, lots and subdivisions and the owners thereof, and shall run with the land applying and binding the present owners and all future owners and successors in interest. D. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish that these Covenants do hereby create the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE,Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, publish, and impose upon the Parcel, the following protective and restrictive covenants upon the property which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design, use, and development of the Parcel, and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted as herein mentioned, and said Covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, lot, or division. Said Covenants are as follows. 2 ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Lot Owners' Association" or "Association" shall mean the Northern Rockies Professional Center Lot Owners' Association, its successors and assigns. The Association may be incorporated as a Montana nonprofit corporation or a Limited Liability Corporation with its members as the lot owners. 1.2 "Member" shall mean any person or entity owning or purchasing a lot in the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision property. Each lot owner shall be a member of the Association and agrees to abide by and be bound by these Covenants, and the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and Resolutions of the Association, if any. 1.3 "Owner" shall mean the legal title holders, or contract purchasers, whether one or more persons or entities, owning or purchasing a fee simple title to any lot but excluding those having an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation; provided, however, that prior to the first conveyance of each portion of the properties for value, owner shall mean Declarant. 1.4 "Declarant" shall mean XXXXX or assigns, and shall not mean a purchaser of a lot from the Declarant. 1.5 "First President of the Association"or"First President" shall mean the person who has the complete, final, and binding authority over all matters and decisions of the Association, including but not limited to, the operation hiring, accounting, financing, management, and the operation hiring, accounting, and management of the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee or"Committee". The First President of the Association will be either the Declarant himself or a representative of the Declarant, and the First President's position and authority over the Association shall be permanent unless he chooses, in writing, to resign at an earlier time. 1.6 "Architectural and Landscape Review Committee" or"Committee" or A.L.R.C. shall mean the Committee appointed by the Declarant whose function is to review and approve or disapprove plans, specifications, designs, landscaping, sites and locations of improvements to be constructed or erected on the property. 1.7 "Declaration" shall mean this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision, and as it may, from time to time,be amended or supplemented. 1.8 "Parcel" shall mean all of the real property described and platted as NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision, according to the official 3 0 �! i subdivision plats thereof filed of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.9 "Property" shall mean a specific part of the Parcel which has a specific zoning designation and use, i.e., Office Use, as shown on the plat of the Northern Rockies Professional Center Subdivision. 1.10 "Project" shall mean the organization, division, improvement, operation and sale of property in NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 1.11 "Lot" shall mean the smallest subdivided unit of land for sale in the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property as shown on the plat for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 1.12 "Common Area" or"Open Space" shall mean all of the Parcel conveyed to the Lot Owner's Association for use by the Association and its Members and the Owners in common. The Common Area shall be the parts of the Parcel within the zoned property which are not specifically owned by individual Lot owners. 1.13 "Open Space Management Plan" shall mean the management plan for the Common Area or Open Space conveyed to the Lot Owner's Association for use by the Association and its Members and the Owners in common. 1.14 "Beneficiary" shall mean a Mortgagee under a Mortgage, as well as a Beneficiary under a Trust Indenture. 1.15 "Mortgage" shall mean a Trust Indenture as well as a Mortgage. 1.16 "Mortgagee" shall mean a Beneficiary under, or holder of, a Trust Indenture as well as a Mortgagee under a Mortgage. 1.17 "Architect" shall mean a person holding a certificate of registration to practice architecture in the State of Montana or any state in the United States. 1.18 "Improvement(s)" shall include, but not exclusively, all building, outbuildings, bridges,roads,paths, pathways, driveways,parking areas, fences, screening walls and barriers,retaining walls, stairs, decks, water lines, sewer lines, springs, ponds, lagoons, ditches, viaducts and electrical, gas and TV distribution facilities hedges; windbreaks, natural and or planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, loading areas and all other structures, installations and landscaping of every type and kind, whether above or below the land surface. 1.19 "Capital Improvement(s)" shall mean an Improvement or two or more interdependent improvements of a substantial nature benefiting the Association, Common Area,which,when undertaken, may reasonably be anticipated to require a projected expenditure by the Association of a total amount greater than $10,000.00. 4 • 1.20 "Occupant" shall mean a lessee or licensee of an Owner, or any other person or entity other than the Owner in lawful possession of a Lot or Lots with the permission of the Owner. 1.21 "Record", "recording", "recorded" or"recordation", shall mean, with respect to any document, the recordation of said document, the recordation of said document in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.22 "Developer" or"Building Contractor" shall mean any person or entity buying one or more Lots from the Declarant for the purpose of building office. 1.23 "Office", refer to a specific classification of R-O office buildings as defined in the Bozeman Zone Code. 1.24 "A.L.R.C." is an abbreviation for the Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. ARTICLE II AUTHORITY These guidelines shall apply to the subdivision plats for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision as will be recorded at the Gallatin County Courthouse. Declarant hereby declares that the entire Parcel, more particularly described above, is, and shall be, conveyed,hypothecated, encumbered, leased, occupied,built upon or otherwise used, improved, or transferred in whole or in part, subject to this Declaration. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth herein are declared and agreed to be in furtherance of a general plan for the division, improvement and sale of the property and are established for the purpose of enhancing, conserving, and protecting the value, desirability and attractiveness of the property and every part thereof. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions herein shall run with all of the property for all purposes and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Declarant, the Association and all Owners, Occupants, and their successors in interest as set forth in the Declaration. The Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee and the Association is established under the authority of these Restrictive Covenants for the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision property, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Owners' Association of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision and the Montana Non-Profit or L.C.C. Corporation Act. 5 0 ARTICLE III GENERAL COVENANTS 3.1 Owner's Right to Common Area, Paths and Roads. Every Owner shall have a right to use the Common Areas, Paths, and Roads as shown on the approved final plat of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. The Owner's right to use the Common Areas, Paths and Roads shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot, subject to the following Provisions: a) The right of the Association to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the Common Areas, Paths, and Roads for the overall benefit of the Association and its members including limitations on the number of guests permitted to use the Common Area and restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including,but not limited to, the use of firearms, fireworks, all motor driven vehicles, loud music, and loud parties in the Common Area or as otherwise specified in the Open Space Management Plan; b) The Open Space Management Plan and any other reasonable restrictions on the use of the Common Areas and Paths shall be enforced and implemented by the president of the Association. c) The right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or any part of its right to the Common Area and Trials to any public agency, authority, utility, person, corporation or other entity for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Association. No such dedication or transfer shall be effective unless approved by sixty seven percent (67%) of the Directors. 3.2 Owners Right to Parking Area. Every Owner shall have a right to use the parking areas. The Owner's right to use the parking areas shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot or building subject to the following provisions: a) Compliance with the Bozeman City Zone Code. b) The right of the Association and the First President to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the parking areas for the overall benefit of the Association and its members including restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use including, but not limited to, special sales events, merchandise display stands or tables, signs, fireworks, loud music, and loud parties in the parking area. c) The right of the Association to charge reasonable fees for the disproportionate use by Owners or their clients of the parking area. d) The right of the Association to suspend the voting rights and right to use of the parking areas of any Owner and/or Occupant for any period during which any assessment against his Lot or person remains unpaid and for any infraction of its published rules and regulations for any period of time the Association deems necessary. 6 i i 3.3 Nuisance. No Owner, guest or invitee may use or occupy the Common Area, Paths, Roads,building,parking area, or any Lot in such a manner as to disturb or interfere with the peaceful use, occupancy or enjoyment of any other Lot or building Owner in the subdivision. Violations shall be enforced as provided in paragraph 12.1 of these Covenants. 3.4 Control and Management. The Association shall have the exclusive right and obligation to manage, control, and maintain the Common Area, Paths, Roads, and Parking Areas including but not limited to the layout, design, and installation of any improvements in accordance with these Covenants and the Open Space Management Plan for the Common Area. 3.5 Delegation of Use. Any Owner may delegate, upon notification to the Association, to the members of his immediate family, or contract purchasers who reside on the property, his right of enjoyment to the Common Area, Paths, Roads and facilities. 3.6 Reservation of Easements. The Declarant reserves the right to grant and/or dedicate an easement or easements in any location on, over or across any Road, Parking Area, Common Area, or Path for water, sewer, natural gas, electrical, fiber optics or cable TV for the installation, maintenance and repair of all such new or existing services and utilities. 3.7 Right of Access. The Association, First President, delegated representatives, or the Declarant shall have the irrevocable right to have access across any Road, Lot(s), Parking Areas, and Common Area to each building or Improvement from time to time during reasonable hours as may be necessary for the inspection, maintenance, repair, or replacement of any Improvements thereon in accordance with Sections 11.1, 11.4, 11.5, and 12.1. Such right of access therefore, shall be for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Committee approval and architectural controls in the subdivision. Except for improvements owned by the Association or used by the Association for its benefit or that of its members, all maintenance, repairs, or replacements on any Lot or on any structure thereon belonging to any Owner shall, as otherwise provided herein,be at the expense of the Owner thereof. A similar right of access shall also be reserved and be immediate for the making of emergency repairs therein in order to prevent property damage or personal injury. All damaged Improvements shall be restored to substantially the same condition in which they existed prior to the damage. All maintenance, repairs, and replacements of the Common Area, Paths, and Improvements shall be the common expense of the Association and all of the Owners; provided however, if such damage is caused by a negligent or tortuous act of any Owner, members of his family, his Occupant, agents, employees, invitee(s), or licensee(s), then such Owner shall be responsible and liable for all such damage. 3.8 Underground Utilities. All lines, pipes,wires and all other improvements relating to water, sewer, natural gas, power, cable TV and any and all other utilities and services 7 0 must be buried underground except for the Improvements required to be above ground by the provider of the utility service. 3.9 Agricultural uses of neighboring properties. Lot Owners in the subdivision are informed that adjacent uses maybe agricultural. Lot owners accept and are aware that standard agricultural and farming practices can result in dust, animal odors, flies, burning and machinery noise. Standard agricultural practices feature the use of heavy equipment, chemical sprays and the use of machinery early in the morning an sometimes late into the evening. ARTICLE IV ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP AND VOTING RIGHTS 4.1 Membership. Every Owner of a Lot or building which is subject to assessment shall be a member of the Association. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of a Lot which is subject to assessment. Membership is automatically transferred on any sale of an Lot to the new Owner, The Declarant shall be the First President of the Association. 4.2 Voting. Within the Association each member shall be entitled to one vote for each Lot owned. It is estimated that there will be approximately eight (8) lots within the property, and therefore a potential for approximately eight(8) votes. When more than one person holds an interest in any Lot or building, Owners shall designate one person to be the agent for receiving notices hereunder, and for the purpose of voting. Each Lot Owner shall be responsible for advising the Association in writing of their current address and the person designated to vote. The Association shall be deemed to have complied with notice requirements and these covenants by mailing notice to the address of the designated Lot Owner which is on file in writing with the Association. The First President of the Association shall have the complete, final, and binding authority over all matters and decisions as necessary to carry out all the purposes of the association, until the total number of votes of the Association members has reached a total of five (5) or more votes, and until all the buildings are built in phase I. At this time the First President will resign, in writing, and relinquish his sole decision making authority over the Association. At this time the Association will elect a new President. The new President will not have the same power the First President had, and he will have only one vote which will be equal to the one vote of any one member of the Association. A new President will be elected annually unless the Association chooses to elect the same President again. But, until such time as the First President resigns his position, if the First President is absent for any reason, then the remaining members of the Association are completely powerless to vote or decide on any issue whatsoever pertaining to the business of the Association. 4.3 Notice and Quorum For Any Authorized Action. During the development and building of the buildings, the presence of the First President is all that is necessary for final decisions to be made and a quorum will not be required. But as in paragraph 4.2, 8 l 0 once construction of all buildings is complete and the First President resigns, then meetings shall require the presence of Association members entitled to cast a minimum of sixty six (66%)percent of all votes of the association. The presence of Association members entitled to cast sixty-six (66%)percent of all votes of the Association shall constitute a quorum. 4.4 Meetings. There shall be a minimum of two (2) meetings per year called by the First President or subsequent Presidents at a date, time, and place shall be determined by the President. The President of the association has the right to call as many meetings as he/she deems necessary in order to perform all the functions of the Association in an efficient and professional manner. 4.5 Hired Officers and Contractual Agreements. The First President and subsequently the Association shall have the authority to hire additional professional officers or other personnel which they deem necessary for the smooth, efficient, and professional functioning of the Association. It is the general intent of this paragraph that these professional officers or other personnel are hired because they serve some specific function which is not able to be professionally performed by a regular member of the Association. Although, if one of the Association members is professionally qualified to perform a specific function which the Association needs, then it is permissible for a member to also be hired on this specific professional capacity. Although, these hired officers or other personnel shall not have a vote, unless they are a member of the Association. They may include,but not be limited to the manager, secretary, treasurer, accountant, and maintenance personnel. The Association shall also have the authority to make contractual arrangements with outside entities, including but not limited to an attorney, accountant, engineer, maintenance contractors, and building contractors to provide for the smooth, efficient, and professional function of the Association. ARTICLE V ASSESSMENTS 5.1 Creation of Lien and Personal Obligation of Assessments The Declarant, for each Lot owned within the properties,hereby covenants and each Owner of any Lot by acceptance of a deed thereof, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, is deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association: (1) Annual assessment or charges; (2) Special assessments; Such assessments are to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments shall be in charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each lien upon the property against which each such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees shall be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such property at the time when the assessment fell due. 9 5.2 Purpose of Assessments. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used exclusively to promote the recreation, health, safety, and welfare of the Owners of the property within the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER and the Association and for the improvement, repair, maintenance, and protection of the roads, Common Area, Paths, Parking Areas, Common Areas facilities. As such, these purposes may also include,but shall not be limited to, funding for: the payment of taxes; the purchase of insurance for the Common Area and risks involving the Association maintenance (including snow removal) of roads, parking areas, utilities, streams, creeks, drainage ditches,ponds, paths,bridges and other improvements or easements owned by the Association or used by the Owners in common: the establishment, maintenance, and protection of pasture lands, crops, streams, creeks, drainage ditches, ponds, lagoons, timber, wildlife and animals within the property; the planting, cultivating, mowing, maintenance, harvesting and cutting of fields, grass, weeds or lands within the property; the construction, maintenance and repair of all Improvements, including buildings, structures, ponds, lagoons, drainage ditches, utilities, recreational facilities owned by the Association and constructed on the Common Area or elsewhere for the benefit of the Association; and the cost of labor, equipment, services, materials, management, protection and supervision of the assets and interests of the Association. 5.3 Annual Assessments. Annual Assessments shall be determined by the Association in an amount estimated to cover the normal operating expenses of the Association for each year as determined in conformity with standard accounting practices, together with such additional amounts as may, in their reasonable judgment,be necessary to cover any past deficits from operations or to create reasonable reserves for the future cost of operations of the Association. Annual assessments shall be apportioned among the individual Lot Owners according to the square footage of the Owner's building. Proximity to the Common Area, percentage of street use, or any other variables which may seem more or less favorable to an individual building Owner will not be valid in the determination of the annual assessments. 5.4 Special Assessments. In addition to an annual assessments to cover the Association's operating expenses, the Association,may levy, in any assessment year, special assessment(s) for the purpose of reserving or paying for, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction,maintenance,repair or replacement of a Capital Improvement of the Association upon the Common Area and Parking Areas including personal property related there on, and for such other purposes or projects benefiting the Association and its interests provided that any such assessments shall have the assent of two-thirds of the votes of the Association at a meeting called for this purpose. Nothing stated therein shall restrict the right of the Association to provide for the repayment of the special assessment, and upon terms and conditions it deems appropriate, including the collection of interest on the deferred balance. 5.5 Notice and Quorum for AM Action Authorized Under Section 5.4. Written notice of any meeting called for the purpose of taking any action authorized under Section 5.4 of Article V shall be sent to all members not less than ten(10) days nor more than thirty (30) days in advance of the meeting. At the first such meeting called, the presence of 10 members entitled to case sixty six percent(66%) of all of the votes of the Directors shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the same notice requirement, and the required quorum at the subsequent meetings shall be one-half of the required quorum at the preceding meeting. No such subsequent meeting shall be held sooner than fifteen(15) days following the preceding meeting. 5.6 Uniform Rate of Assessment. Both annual and special assessments will be determined according to the square footage of the Owner's building. However, when in the judgment of the Association, a Capital Improvement is of a nature that uniquely restores damages or provides value only to certain individual Lot or building Owners then, to the extent determined by the Association that such Improvements are not beneficial to the Association as a whole or to the Owners of Lots or buildings in general, such portion of costs which solely contribute to those certain individual Lots or buildings may be pro-rated, scheduled and assessed among only those Owners of Lots or buildings affected. 5.7 Date of Commencement of Annual Assessment; Due Date. The annual assessments shall be assessed on a calendar year basis. The first annual assessment shall be adjusted according to the number of months remaining in the calendar year. The Association shall fix the amount of the annual assessment against each Lot or building at least(30) days in advance of each annual assessment period. Written notice of the annual assessment shall be sent to every Owner subject thereto. The due dates shall be established by the Association. The Association shall, upon demand, and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by the Association President or his representative setting forth whether the assessments on a specific Lot or building have been paid. 5.8 Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association. Any assessment not paid within thirty(30) days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at a rate of six (6)percentage points above the Prime Rate for Bank Lending in New York City. The Association may record a notice of lien against the property and bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the same, or foreclose the lien against the property in the same manner as a mortgage on real property, and the Association shall be entitled in any such actions or foreclosures proceedings to recover its costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his Lot. 5.9 Subordination of Lien to First Mortgage. The lien of the assessments provided for herein shall not subordinate to the lien of any first mortgage. Sale or transfer of any Lot shall not affect the assessment lien, whether such lien arises prior to such sale or transfer, or thereafter becomes due. 5.10 Declarant Assessments. For the purpose of assessments, any Lots owned by the Declarant shall be subject to the same assessments and provisions of these Articles as any other Owner. 11 ARTICLE VI ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL 6.1 Intent. The architectural and design Covenants and guidelines which follow are intended to compliment the Bozeman Zoning Code and any future protective covenants which govern this Project, and to clarify the intention for the design of buildings for the Project. Specifically, these guidelines set forth design criteria which addresses the building design and location landscaping, lot density, and other improvements. The intent of these guidelines is to allow as much flexibility as possible while at the same time define a minimum level of quality and consistency of building design which will be consistent with and maximize the quality of the overall Project. The unique design elements of the Developer, Building Contractor, Architect, and Owners for both the landscaping and the buildings will be respected, and individual expression is encouraged, provided they are harmonious with the overall plan of the area and the Project. Except insofar as its duties may be extended with respect to a particular area by the Association, the Committee shall review and approve or disapprove all plans and specifications submitted to it for any proposed improvement. No construction or alteration of any improvement or any work affecting the external appearance of any improvement shall be made, erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain upon the Lot until a site plan, floor plans, elevations, trim details, specifications and landscaping showing the design, location, material(s), and color(s) together with the name of the contractor shall have been submitted to and such site plan and specifications are approved in writing by the Committee. 6.2 Membership of Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. The Committee shall consist of three (3)members appointed by the First President. One (1) of the (3) members of the Committee shall be the First President. The second member shall be representative of the First President, and the third member shall be appointed by the First President. It is also suggested that at least one of the members of the Committee have professional qualifications in the area of architecture. In this regard, the First President may, as provided for in paragraph 4.5 of these Covenants, hire an architect to reside on the Committee in lieu of the third member of the Committee. 6.3 Standards For Review. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all proposed construction shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,National Plumbing Code and the National Electrical Code,NEPA, and the Design Guidelines. All plans must be harmonious with the overall plan for the development. All plans, materials and specification must be suitable to the site, adjacent properties and the neighborhood. All improvements must be compatible with the surrounding properties so as to not impair or degrade property or aesthetic values. 6.4 Approval or Disapproval by Architectural and Landscaping Review Committee. The Committee has fifteen(15) days to approve or disapprove the location, construction design, landscaping, and materials used for the building, This fifteen(15) day approval time period will not start until after the detailed site plan, floor plans, roof plans, trim details,project specifications, color samples, sample materials and landscaping plan have 12 l I all been submitted to the Committee. The Committee will then notify the Owner, in writing, of the date of the start of the fifteen(15) day approval period. If the Committee feels that insufficient plans, project specifications, color samples, sample materials or landscaping plans have been submitted either by the Lot owner or the Owners representative, then the fifteen(15) day time period will not begin until the Committee informs the Owner, in writing that all plans, samples, and materials provided are acceptable. As a protection to the Owner, if the Owner has been notified in writing by the Committee of the starting date of the fifteen(15) day approval period and the Committee does not respond with approval or disapproval by the end of the fifteen(15) day approval period, then the approval shall be deemed granted. Any plans, specification, samples, and proposals approved, either expressly in writing or by the expiration of the fifteen(15) day period hereinabove provided, shall then permit the Owner to commence construction in accordance with said plan, but any deviation from said plan which, in the judgment of the Committee, is also; a) a deviation of substance from either the Design Guidelines; b) the requirements of this Declaration; c) a detriment to the appearance of the structure or to the surrounding area shall be promptly corrected to conform with the submitted plan by the Owner or corrected by the Association at the Owner's expense as provided in sections 6.5 and 7.1 of these Covenants. 6.5 Inspection of Work. Upon the completion of any Improvement, if the Committee finds that such work was not done in strict compliance with all approved plans and specifications submitted or required to be submitted for its prior approval, it shall notify the Owner and the Association of such noncompliance, and shall require the Owner to remedy the same. If, upon the expiration of(7) days from the date of such notification, the Owner has failed to commence to remedy such noncompliance, the Association shall determine the nature and extent of noncompliance thereof and the estimated cost of correction or removing the same (this (7) day period does not apply to any case as described in paragraph 11.11 which shall be subject to remedy within 2 hours of the infraction). The Association shall notify the Owner in writing of the estimated cost of correction or removal. The Owner shall then only have five (5) days to commence such remedy and thirty(30) days to complete such remedy. If the Owner still does not comply with the Association's ruling within five (5) day period, the Association, at their option, may either remove the non-complying improvement or remedy the non-compliance, and the Owner shall reimburse the Association upon demand for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Association, the Association shall levy an assessment and file a lien against such Owner and the Improvement in question and the land on which the same is situated for reimbursement and the same shall be enforced and/or foreclosed upon in the manner provided for by law for mortgages. The Committee may inspect all work in progress and give notice of noncompliance as provided above. 6.6 Design Submittal. It is suggested that the applicant submit a schematic set of drawings for review by the A.L.R.C. While this preliminary submittal is optional, it can be used by the applicant to determine aspects of the design that might be changed to assure later approval prior to the time and expense of a complete set of Construction Drawings. Following is the minimum Submittal required by the A.L.R.C.: 13 • • a) Site plans including landscaping, walks and decks. (Scale: 1/8"= IV'or similar engineering scale) b) Complete Construction Drawings—At least two (2) sets shall be submitted to the Committee for approval. This includes floor plans, exterior elevations of all sides, roof design, specifications and any construction details. Additional submittal elements may be requested by the Committee for clarification of the design if needed and shall be supplied by the applicant. (Scale 1/4"= IV') c) Samples of all exterior materials with their respective color proposals in an adequate size to evaluate properly. The time allowed for review of the plans will be no longer than fifteen (15) days from the time all design submittal requirements are received by the Committee. The time for plan review shall be adjusted accordingly if plans are submitted during any holidays. Approval of plan submittal shall require a majority by the Committee. d) A review fee will be required at the time of submission of all the design submittal documents and materials. The Owner shall submit the required design review fee to the Committee. It shall be the duty of the Association to establish the amount of the design review fee. The purpose of the design review fee shall be to defray the Association's cost of review of all proposed site plans and specifications submitted to them. 6.7 Start of Construction. There shall be no construction work initiated without a building permit issued by the City of Bozeman and without written approval of the plans by the Committee. All building construction and landscaping must conform to both the final approved plans by the City of Bozeman and the Committee. If the Owner does not intend to start construction within three(3)months of purchasing the Lot, then permission in writing will need to be obtained from the Committee to suspend construction of their building until some future date. The Owner will be required to submit in writing a Lot maintenance program that is acceptable to the Committee. Such a program will minimally include but is not limited to killing and removing all existing weeds on the Lot, finish grading the lot if deemed necessary by the Committee,planting an acceptable seeding program as a new ground cover, providing a mowing maintenance schedule, mowing Lot in accordance to the maintenance schedule, and otherwise keeping the Lot in an attractive and presentable condition at all times. Storage of anything on the Lot during this time is completely forbidden. 6.8 Completion. All work on any improvement in the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property must be complete wotjom twelve (12) months of the date of commencement unless the Committee in writing agrees to an extension. 14 ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1 Enforcement. Violation by an Owner, Occupant, Licensee, Architect, or representative of the Owner of any restrictions, conditions, covenants or agreements herein contained shall give the Association, with reasonable notice, the right to enter upon the property concerned, and to summarily abate and remove at the expense of the Owner any erection, thing, or condition that may be in, or upon, said Lot,building, Common Area, road or right of ways contrary to the provisions hereof without being deemed guilty of trespass. The result of every act or omission whereby ant restrictions, condition, covenant, or agreement is violated in whole, or in part, is hereby declared to be and constitute a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law against a nuisance, either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result. The Association, or any Owner, shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, fines and charges now or hereafter imposed. Failure by the Association or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. 7.2 Costs of Enforcement. Should any lawsuit or other legal proceeding be instituted by the Association against an Owner alleged to have violated one or more of the provisions of this Declaration and should the Association be wholly or partially successful in such proceeding, the offending Owner shall be obligated to pay the costs of such proceeding, including reasonable attorney's fees at both the trial and appellate level. 7.3 Severability. Invalidation of any of these covenants or restrictions by legal judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. i 7.4 Amendment. Except those provisions requiring a greater consent, any provision herein may be amended or revoked and additional provisions added, at any time by a written instrument recorded in the office of Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, duly signed and acknowledged by the Owners or record of not less than eighty(80)percent of the Lots subject to this Declaration. 7.5 Term. The provisions of this Declaration shall be binding for a term of twenty five (25) years from the date of this Declaration, after which time the Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten(10) years not to exceed three (3) such extensions unless an instrument agreeing to amend, revoke or terminate this Declaration has been signed by the Owner's of eighty(80)percent of the Lots has been recorded. 15 7.6 Non-liability of Committee Members. Neither the Committee nor any member thereof, nor the Association nor any member thereof shall be liable to the Association or to any Owner or to any other person of any loss, damage or injury arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of the Committee's or the Association's respective duties under this Declaration unless such loss, damage or injury is due to the willful misconduct of the Committee or its members or of the Association or its members. 7.7 Reservation of Authority. Notwithstanding anything contained therein to the contrary, the Declarant hereby reserves all rights and authorities granted to him in this declaration, to the Association and to the Committee until such time as the Declarant waives such reservation of rights in a writing recorded at the Gallatin County Clerk& Recorder's office. ARTICLE VIII SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICTS 8.1 Waiver Of Protest to Future S.I.D.(s). All Owners of Buildings will be required to sign waivers of protest on all future S.I.D.(s)which the City of Bozeman may require them to participate in. ARTICLE IX BUILDING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT 9.1 Intent of Design Criteria. The primary goal is to ensure that the proposed Project design including landscaping maintains or exceeds the general level of quality, size, appearance, and marketability. All initial or subsequent improvements to the privately owned Lots shall be subject to the following architectural and landscaping requirements and guidelines. Approval by the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER and Landscape review Committee shall be obtained prior to application to the City of Bozeman for a building permit. The submittal requirements for review by the A.L.R.C. are specified herein. The A.L.R.C. shall have no power to approve any structure failing to meet, at a minimum, the conditions set forth in this Declaration. 9.2 General Regulations. All lands within the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER are subject to the zoning regulations of the City of Bozeman except for any variances thereto granted by the City of Bozeman as shown on the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER plat as filed in the Gallatin County Courthouse on . As such variances to the zoning requirements of the City of Bozeman shall be specified on the final plat noted above or within the body of this Declaration. In addition to these Regulations,building design may be regulated by City, County, State and Federal regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. The Owner or his or her agent shall be responsible to ensure conformance with any applicable regulations and i 16 I_ should check with the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, and State of Montana Building Codes Division to verify that the most recently adopted edition of any applicable regulation is being used. No construction of, or alteration to, any improvements, whether temporary or permanent, including but not necessarily limited to buildings, fences, walls, earthwork, paving, vegetation, signs, or secondary structures such as utility or trash enclosure, antennas and storage tanks shall be commenced on any lot prior to receiving the written approval of the A.L.R.C. and the City of Bozeman. Interior modification and/or improvements that do not alter the exterior appearance of a building, or the site improvements, shall not require the approval of the A.L.R.C. Although an Owner is responsible to check with the City of Bozeman to see if such interior modification and/or improvements requires their approval. 9.3 Density, Allowable Uses, Allowable Areas and Setbacks. a.)Density. The density of the NRPC P.U.D. shall be as follows: Overall land coverage by principal and accessory buildings shall not be more than 60 percent for commercial uses. The percentage of coverage is based on the total project, as the parking areas and open space are common area and not part of the lot as in a conventional subdivision. b.) Permitted Uses. Permitted Uses shall be as follows: principal uses: Essential services (Type I, see Bozeman Zone Code for definition) Medical Offices, clinics, and centers Offices (professional offices and business headquarters) Conditional Uses: Day Care Centers Accessory Uses: Fences Tool sheds for storage of domestic supplies Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses. Signs, subjects to Chapter 18.65 pf the Bozeman Zoning Board Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work Parking areas C) Building Envelope or Buildable Area. Each lot in NRPC the building envelope determined on the site plan. All construction other than landscaping improvements shall be limited to this buildable area. The building will be subject to additional requirements elsewhere in this document. D) Building Setbacks. All buildings or structures shall have a setback shown on the site plan. Note that setbacks are created by the common open space of the P.U.D. and that the buildable area is defined by the lot and the landscape strip shown on the Final site plan. Additionally, a minimum 10' separation must occur between individual buildings 17 on adjoining lots. Therefore, each building on adjoining lots must maintain a 5' setback from the adjoining lot. 9.4 Height Limits. Maximum roof heights will be 38' with roof pitches of 3/12 or greater and 32' for buildings with flat roofs or with roof pitches of less than 3/12. Measurement of building height shall be in the same manner as specified by the Bozeman Zone Code. 9.5 Minimum and Maximum BuildingS . a) Minimum. 2400 Square Feet. b) Maximum. Limited by the parking calculations for square footages as set forth in this document allocating maximum square footage for the number of parking places provided for each lot and the maximum building coverage as set forth in section 9.3 a(above). 9.6 Buildings on Multiple Lots. A single building may be constructed on contiguous lots,but may not use more the 2 lots unless approved by the A.L.R.C. and the City of Bozeman's Design Review Board as having adequate massing delineation to address the increased linearity of the building. 9.7 Master Signa ems. The signage plan for the P.U.D. incorporates 3 main elements. They are as follows: Planned Unit Development Identification Signs. These 3 signs are located at the 3 main entrances to the Development, located off Ellis Road. The locations are noted on the Final site plan and details are shown. NORTHERN ROCKIFS �0 PROFESSIONAL CENTER 0 Building Identification Signs. These signs are located on the interior street. The locations are noted on the Final site plan and details are shown. The information on the signs will be limited to the name of the building complex and the number range of the units serviced by that entrance. 1 O'-O" X Y Z TECHNOLOGIES O 1 2 3 ALPINE WAY o 18 i Unit Identification Signs. These would be individual signs for each unit within the buildings showing the name of the particular business and the number of the unit. An example would be: XYZ Technologies, 123 Alpine Way. The wall signs for each unit will comply with the formulas set forth in Section 18.65 of the Bozeman Area sign code dated June 15, 2000. All signs must be approved by the A.L.R.C. and receive a permit from the City of Bozeman. ARTICLE X BUILDING GUIDELINES 10.1 Intent and Design Theme. The intent of the following Building Guidelines is to provide for a degree of continuity throughout the built-up setting of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER without stifling personal taste in choice of building style. Furthermore, the intent is to establish minimum standards to ensure that the type of building constructed is at least comparable to and blends with the eclectic styles of architecture found in the surrounding developments. The purpose of the design theme is to produce functional and cost effective structures that have a light commercial with residential accents character, including protected entrances, varying roof lines (including multiple roofs and dormers), exterior spaces such as decks. I � r,-,� r { / � --- — # r � "4 tint � :,.✓� � M� • f 7, Y, P•.-� x '.._ ..... a � // ' 19 10.2 Design Concepts. a) Articulation of main entrances. Each building shall have a clearly defined main entrance that is articulated by roof and building massing as well as landscaped design elements such as sidewalks,planting, lighting elements, etc. A-I:..T_ 1 _ as , > sr_recNxcLxr_s O O O o O 0 O O . T I I i I I I I'! 111 I IElDrIT -- - -- J ❑ ❑ - - - o, rz::] b) Orientation of buildings. Each building shall be oriented to the parking area provided for it in terms of egress and ingress. The building may be additionally oriented to views or to adjacent buildings for purposes of pedestrian circulation between buildings. Each building should be particularly sensitive to the pedestrian traffic between buildings and parking and relate well to the sidewalk required along the building side of the parking lots and shown on the Final P.U.D. plan. c) Scale and Massing of Buildings. Each building design must address the scale and massing not only of the particular building itself but also of adjacent buildings within the P.U.D. Each building will be reviewed by the A.L.R.C. on this basis. � �..— 5. , 5 20 10.3 Roofs. Roofs are a major element in the building design and therefore will be emphasized by the A.L.R.C. a) Shape and Form. It is the intention of these guidelines to require traditional gable, hip, and shed roof designs used in creative and aesthetically pleasing combinations. Potential flat roofs may be accepted by the A.L.R.C. II'1 a all ma6o. 1 1. Secondary roof forms are highly recommended in designs for NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER. These are particularly useful to give proper scale to large roof masses. They can be particularly effective when special care is given to their massing and pattern. 21 • • In addition, no roof ridgeline shall extend more than forty(40) feet without interruption by an intersecting roofline, secondary roof structure, or step down roof in order to break up the overall mass. See Figure A below. <O�• i rI MAX.ROOF RIDGELINE r � Hi rin n- = L., MAX,SIDING 5PAN 28-0' MAX.UNINTERRUPTED HALL Figure A. ROOF ARTICULATION MEASUREMENT CRITERIA b) Pitches. The minimum roof pitch shall be 5:12 for the major components of any roof. Minor components and secondary roof structures, such as shed roofs and dormer roofs may have pitches as low as 4:12. No component of any roof shall have a pitch less than 4:12. Under certain special circumstances the roof design may incorporate as a minor component of the overall roof design a flat roof. Should the applicant demonstrate that a lesser pitch on the major components can achieve the desired results of these guidelines, the committee may approve the design solely at their discretion. However, the applicant will in that case be required to provide a conceptual submittal as described in the submittal requirement section of this document. c) Secondary Roof Structures. Dormers, skylights, chimneys and solar collectors are considered secondary roof structures. Dormers and most other secondary roof structures are encouraged,both to add interest and scale to major roof areas and to make habitable use of space within the roofs. Dormers and other secondary roofs may have gable, hip or shed forms and may be stacked in multiple forms. When designing the location of skylights, consideration should be given to both the interior and exterior appearance of the unit. Locations should also be coordinated with window and door locations. Skylights shall be located away from valleys, ridges and all other areas where drifting snow and snow ice may hinder the performance and safety of the unit. 22 • • d) Eaves, Soffits, and Fascias. All major roof components shall have a minimum horizontal eave projection of 18 inches measured from the finished wall. Minor roof structures may have a reduced eave projection as necessary to maintain proper proportion or for a specific architectural effect demonstrated to the Committee. Eaves may have a horizontal or angled return to the wall. Soffits shall be required to cover all rafter tails and rough framing material except where framing members are finished and protected from exposure. All roof edges shall have a minimum fascia of 6 inches in height. For further illustration see drawing below. EXPOSED RAFTER TAIL ef 1-6' �' MIN.6"FASCIA/ MIN. 10.4 Roofing Materials. Roofing materials enhance the building and need to be compatible with a residential neighborhood. The recommended roofing materials are natural cedar shakes or shingles, heavy gauge, high quality metal, or fiberglass composition shingles in an architectural grade. Other materials may also be considered, but must have written approval from the A.L.R.C. 10.5 Gutters, Downspouts, and Flashing. Gutters and downspouts are allowed but they must be of a color and finish that blends with the finish colors of the structure. Unpainted gutters, downspouts or flashing will not be allowed unless made of copper. Flashing materials shall be of a copper or painted or anodized sheet metal. 10.6 Equipment and Ventilating Roof Projections. All roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into the overall roof design and screened. All roof mounted HVAC equipment will be screened from view with an architectural element consistent with the design of the building and oriented away from the street side of the building. All sewer,bath fan, hot water heater, stove, or other roof venting stacks shall be painted a color as similar as possible to the roof material color. Other non-roof mounted equipment shall likewise be screened from view either with architectural elements such as approved fencing or with the use of landscaping. 10.7 Exterior Walls. The exterior walls are one of the most important aesthetic elements on the building design and will reflect the image of the entire subdivision. Elements of specific concern are scale,proportion, texture and color. The scale and proportion of the exterior walls must have inherent interest and diversity, and harmonized with the high 23 9 0 quality nature of the P.U.D. All buildings will be of new construction and there will be no log, manufactured, mobile, pre-assembled, or modular buildings allowed. a) Material. The materials that are acceptable to provide the desired look and textures are real stone and brick, wood beams and siding which is painted or stained, and stucco. Color lock and vinyl siding may be acceptable provided it is of high quality and simulates wood materials faithfully, and the specific brand is approved by the A.L.R.C. Siding cannot have a continuous run of more than(14) feet, see figure A above. Steel or aluminum siding, unless specifically approved by committee, standard usages of plywood siding, such as T1-11, and unnatural appearing simulated stone, brick or wood are unacceptable. Some simulated stone may be acceptable with approval by the A.L.R.C. The Committee will consider new building materials on the market that maintain the aesthetic character of the subdivision. b) Colors. The colors used must be muted earth tones and must also be considered to harmonize and compliment the surrounding site and neighboring buildings. Trim colors should demonstrate only subtle color changes from the main body of the building, unless demonstrated to the A.L.R.C. to be compatible with the character of the PUD. If the applicant can demonstrate to the A.L.R.C. that brighter trim and accent colors can meet the spirit of this document without detracting from the overall development, then the A.L.R.C. has the option of approving the proposed color scheme solely at their discretion. c) Concrete. Exposed concrete shall be limited to a maximum of 8 inches from the bottom of the siding to the finish grade. Exposures of more than 8 inches shall be covered by shrubs, masonry veneer, and texture concrete surface such as exposed aggregate or synthetic stucco. d) Wall Form. No wall shall consist of a single finish treatment for more than(28) horizontal feet without interruption by a wall projection. Window,wall corner, wall recess, porch or other architectural form that adds interest. See Figure A above. All windows shall be of double or triple glazing..Low"E" coatings are permitted but nomirror glazing shall not be allowed. All windows and sliding glass, French or atrium doors shall be aluminum clad wood. A specific brand of plastic windows may be approved by the Committee,but a sample will need to be produced to the Committee. Unclad custom-built windows for individual applications shall be trimmed and painted to appear the same as the other windows in the structure. The patterns, sizing, symmetry(or asymmetry) of windows and doors determines the scale and feel of the building. The Committee will require that the following aspects be carefully addressed in the window and door design. 1) Consistency of types and shapes. 2) Special shapes used for"feature"windows in appropriate areas. 3) Use of window patterns consistent with the design and massing of the structure. 4) Consistent use of window forms in conjunction with adjacent window forms. 24 10.8 Parking. Each building is required to have the number of parking spaces required by the City of Bozeman Zoning Code. There will be absolutely no parking of cars, trucks, or any other vehicles in the street by Owners. Parking cars over-night in the parking areas is forbidden, except for those buildings with residential use. ARTICLE XI SITE DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES All site improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER A.L.R.C. prior to commencement of construction or alteration. Minor adjustments to the building and landscaping after initial construction shall not require submittal of plans. Minor adjustments shall include replacement of dead or dying vegetation and the addition of trees, shrubs or other landscaping features providing that such additions are consistent with the Site Development and Landscape Guidelines. 11.1 Driveway Culverts. All driveways and parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. Driveway culverts shall have attached flared ends of sheet metal or concrete construction. Culvert ends,not counting the flared ends, shall extend a minimum of 4 feet beyond the edge of the driveway. All culverts damaged by construction shall be replaced prior to final surfacing of the driveway. 11.2 Fences. One of the primary goals of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER is to create an atmosphere that is open and expansive. Because of the importance of this goal, perimeter lot fencing will not be allowed in this subdivision. Fencing for screening of loading areas and mechanical equipment should be only as high as necessary to screen the area or equipment in question, and will in no instance exceed 6' in height unless specifically approved in writing by the A.L.R.C. 11.3 Privacy Screening. Privacy screens will be allowed but must be constructed of wood siding(same as the main building), stucco, brick, or stone materials, and they shall be an integrated part of the main buildings. There shall be a size restriction. Plans for privacy screening must be submitted and approved by the A.L.R.C. 11.4 Exterior Lighting. While lighting for safety and security is encouraged, the elimination of excessive light is of prime concern. All lighting for parking and driving areas shall be fully shielded as shown in the following example, and in no case shall exceed 20' in height. i 25 Additionally, all lighting for the buildings and walk areas shall be concealed or recessed Y � g g into the structure where possible. Also,where wall mounted fixtures or ballard type lighting for pedestrian circulation areas are required, all lighting will be of a type that has the luminaire of the fixture shielded from view from any angle with the exception of the area intended to be illuminated. In no case shall lighting be of a type that is not consistent with light commercial development. !t 1 f 51gt4�i. Lighting for signage shall be limited to landscape type lighting. In cases where internal lighting of signs is required, the translucent lighted portion shall be the letters only and the background shall be dark. Only enough light shall come through the background to give a sense of the background color. 11.5 Utilities. All utilities including, but not limited to,natural gas, electricity, telephone, fiber optics, and cable TV shall be located underground. 11.6 Mail Boxes. Mailboxes shall be designed in accordance with the U.S. Postal Service regulations and approved by the local Postmaster as shown on the site plan. 11.7 Temporary Structures. No temporary structures, trailers, campers, motor buildings, tents, shacks, or similar structures shall be used at any time on the lot. 11.8 Construction Material: Clean up and Debris. A list of acceptable procedures and guidelines will be given to the Owner prior to actual construction commencing and will require the written acceptance of compliance by the Owner prior to starting construction or construction will not be approved. Construction materials shall not at any time prior to or during construction be placed or stored in the street or placed anywhere else so as to impede, obstruct or interfere with pedestrians within the street right of way. Absolutely all construction materials shall be removed from the entire Lot within thirty(30) days of substantial completion of construction. 26 L Construction sites shall be kept clean, neat and well organized at all times. Any construction debris shall be the responsibility of the Building Contractor and Owner and shall be kept clean and properly stored on a daily basis. If construction debris blows onto another Owners lot it is the responsibility of the Owner's contractor to clean it up immediately. Of particular concern to the Declarant is street cleanliness. Any construction debris, and especially dirt, gravel, rocks, and concrete which find their way into the street, shall be removed immediately(within 60 minutes of the start of the infraction) from the street and be brought back to a broom clean condition or clean up costs and a fine may be levied and enforced as in Sections 6.5 and 7.1 of this Declaration. Owners are highly encouraged to notify their building contractors of this important condition prior to signing their construction contract with them. 11.9 Solid Waste Containers. Dumpster enclosures shall be designed in the same style as the main buildings. If the enclosure is designed to match the building(s) served, it shall be approved in writing by the A.L.R.C. All enclosures shall have an impervious floor. O O hh Yf T a O b n 0 M PLAN VIEW FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION All solid waste containers must be stored in their enclosures except during reasonable periods prior to and after pickup, and only on day of pickup. 11.10 Ste. Signs shall not be permitted on the private,public, or commonly owned lands within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER except as follows: Signs shall comply to the Master sign plan addressed in section 9.7. 11.11 Landscaping. Landscaping will be required to enhance the value of the property and the aesthetics of the site. The entire site shall be landscaped, including up to the actual edge of the road, and all owners are required to maintain their grounds. Landscape, grading and irrigation plans shall be submitted and approved by the Committee concurrently with all structural building plans. In locating bushes and trees consideration must be given to surrounding neighbors concerning view corridors and sun penetration to their site. Rock and Gravel type ground covers will not be allowed as landscaping. Certain types of gravel and rock ground covers will be allowed for certain 27 specific non-landscaping uses. All such uses must be approved by the Committee. This limitation does not apply to specific large rocks or rock clusters being used in an artistic manner. Owners shall maintain the transition from the formal landscaping around the buildings and the Open Space areas will be maintained to a lesser degree according to the Open Space Management Plan. Where lawn is planted, an underground sprinkler system will be required. 11.12 Landscaping Maintenance. Lawns and landscaping shall be maintained in a manner which shall not detract from the appearance and value of adjoining Lots or diminish the aesthetics of the subdivision. Infractions will be dealt with as defined in paragraphs 6.5 and 7.1 of these Covenants. 11.13 Landscaping Requirements for Individual Buildings. Each proposed building will provide a landscape plan for the review committee of the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owner's Association. This plan will show all foundation and perimeter plantings, irrigation system plans, sidewalks, and other landscape elements. For every 3 linear feet of foundation wall, the owner will be required to provide and plant as a minimum 1 small ornamental tree, 1 evergreen shrub, or 1 deciduous shrub as defined in the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. This landscape plan will be designed to soften the transition between the building and the landscaped lot and will be consistent with the approved landscape plan of NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER. There will be a minimum of 6 trees required per Lot, and all trees will be a minimum of ten(10') feet in height. Trees are encouraged to be planted in clusters rather than in regular intervals around the property. Shrubs and flowers can be used to provide a transitional mass from the tree clusters to the lawn surfaces. Deciduous trees and shrubs can be placed on the southern and western sides to provide shade in the summer months and allow sun to penetrate in the winter months. Suggested deciduous trees are Aspen, European Green Birch, Rocky Mountain and Big Tooth Maple, and others recommended by the City of Bozeman Code. Suggested evergreen trees are Douglas Fir, Lodge Pole Pine, Engleman, and White Spruce, Subalpine Fir and Scotch Pine. Additionally for each building built directly adjacent to another building, the landscape plan shall denote 1 large canopy tree for every 30' of adjacency. In the event that a large tree is inappropriate, 2 small ornamental trees may be substituted. Definitions for plantings will be from the Bozeman Zoning Code. Each building will be required to provide a substantial landscape strip between the building and the sidewalk along the parking. In no case shall the width be less than 4 feet, with the exception of those places where the sidewalk abuts the entrances. Each building will provide a bicycle rack consistent with the following detail or an alternate design approved by the A.L.R.C. 28 i 1 IL I Z' Typical Street and Sidewalk. 31KE RACK TO BE PRIMED AND PAINTED-PAINT COLOR • TO MATGN EXPOSED EXTERIOR STEEL r_o• ' I —_T 11 YP,GONG.WALK 11 ,3'�Q. _—` ��':' � �EAa.!o'�....i•....4'15RAV E;BASE ,—t7—r ^' .'♦,—.. _ COMPACTED SOIL-- ..l w-n OGROSS DOWEL,TYP• _GONG.FTC. Bike Rack Detail. 11.14 Numbering System of Buildings.. 29 I�� ARTICLE XII OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN 12.1 Intent. This declaration provides the authority for this Open Space Management Plan through the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision Lot Owners Association. The intent of the Open Space Management Plan is to provide for the management, maintenance, implementation, and protection of the Common Open Space within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER property. The intent of the Open Spaces is to provide: a) a general feeling of openness b) a buffer zone between lot clusters, c) corridors for paths The following Open Space management standards apply to the Open Space lands in the property within NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. 12.2 Open Space. The project has 3 levels of space: Public Space, constituted by the roads and pedestrian system. Private Space, constituted by the lots and buildings within the P.U.D., and those areas immediately adjacent to buildings not served by elements such as pedestrian facilities or recreational elements such as benches or picnic tables. Semi-Public Spaces, such as parking lots, which are intended for the users of the offices within the P.U.D. as well as their guests. 12.3 Landscapes. Landscaping plantings shall feature native species but may incorporate non-native and ornamental species of trees and shrubs. The dominant theme for landscaping shall be large open grassy areas with clusters of trees, to create visual backdrops and vegetated islands requiring little maintenance. 12.4 Maintenance Practices. The president shall determine frequency and schedule of all open space maintenance practices. 12.5 Noxious Weeds. Noxious weeds shall be controlled on all common open space areas. The preferred method is by introduction of desirable plant species that eliminate weeds. Interim measures permitted include herbicide applications, mowing and biological control. All herbicide applications shall be conducted according to applicable State laws. 12.6 Animal Control. Domestic pets shall not be allowed at any time in the open space areas or paths unless on a leash. Temporary fencing around shrubs and trees to prevent animal depredation shall be permitted for the period of time necessary to ensure survival of the plantings. 30 l Rodents may be controlled if levels of depredation threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. If poisons are used they shall be applied only n accordance with applicable State laws. Pesticides may be used to control insect populations that are a nuisance, threaten the survival of plantings or constitute a health hazard. Pesticides may be applied only in accordance with applicable State laws. 12.7 Additional Restrictions. a) All buildings shall be prohibited in the common open space areas except structures related to the function and intent of the common areas. b) Motorized vehicles are prohibited within the common open space areas except for maintenance and construction of landscaping, facilities or structures related to the function or intent of the open spaces. c) No open burning of privately generated debris shall be permitted on commonly held open spaces. Open burning of debris generated from the commonly held spaces may be allowed in accordance with local burning regulations,but only by someone authorized by the Board. Individual lot owners shall not be allowed to burn in either their private property or in the common open spaces. 12.8 Road and Sidewalk Management Plan. The intent of this section is to NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owners Association to establish a maintenance plan for the commonly owned vehicular and pedestrian facilities within the subdivision. The purpose of the management plan shall be to provide for the long term maintenance, reconstruction and replacement of all street and sidewalk surfaces located in the common area in the subdivision. The Association shall accept ownership and maintenance of all streets and sidewalks when constructed to the standards approved on the final plat for the NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Subdivision. The NORTHERN ROCKIES PROFESSIONAL CENTER Lot Owners Association shall have no authority, duty or right to obstruct, delay or harass the Declarant in regards to additions to or extensions of streets or sidewalks that are approved by the City of Bozeman. The Association, acting for the Association, shall establish a plan for long term maintenance of all roads and sidewalks. The Association shall also establish a plan for the day to day maintenance of the roads and sidewalks. In accordance with such plans, the Association shall see to it that the sidewalks and roads are maintained, cleaned and snowplowed in a timely fashion. The Association shall hire contract services for road, sidewalk and driveway maintenance. The Association shall have the authority to assess the Lot Owners for services rendered in maintaining and repairing all streets and sidewalks as specified in Article 5, titled Assessments. 31 Oompbe Jay Lyndes City of Bozeman Bozeman Deaconess Foundation 600 Indian Trail Administration Dept. 901 Highland Boulevard Billings, MT 59105-2702 P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59771 Jay Lyndes City of Bozeman ,> Bozeman Deaconess Foundation 600 Indian Trail Administration Dept. 901 Highland Boulevard Billings, MT 59105-2702 P.O. Box 1230 ," Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59771 Jay Lyndes City of Bozeman Bozeman Deaconess Foundation 600 Indian Trail Administration Dept. 901 Highland Boulevard Billings, MT 59105-2702 is P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59715 i Bozeman, MT 59771 so CITY CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v 9'L * ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 COo�'�e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE 1 OFF DATE: October 20, 2003 TO: John Campbell, MD FAX NUMBER: 587-5548 FROM: Jami Morris, Associate Planner RE: Northern Rockies Professional Center Site Visit for Acceptance of Improvements MESSAGE: The Planning Office conducted a site visit on October 14, 2003 to determine if all of the conditions of approval have been met for the Northern Rockies Professional Center. The following items will need to be dealt with prior to releasing the terms of the Improvements Agreement on file with the Clerk and Recorder's Office: ❑ Landscaping along the entire south property line is rock. Alternatives to turf could have been proposed but upon inquiry our office had recommended ornamental grasses. We specifically require 75% of the landscape areas to be vegetative. The landscape/open space areas are clearly more than 25% rock. Furthermore, one of the conditions of approval required additional vegetative screening along the south property line and the approved landscape plan had depicted extensive plantings along the property line. ❑ There are no picnic tables in the open space areas. The Design Review Board's condition of approval required the incorporation of"people spaces". You proposed incorporating picnic tables and benches around the dry creek bed feature that was going to be constructed in the common open space area. ❑ Large utility boxes have been placed in the common open space. This is not an approved location for these fixtures. The boxes will need to be fully screened with an opaque material and then landscaped in order to remain in the current location. ❑ The condition of approval required all mechanical equipment to be screened from view. The green mechanical boxes adjacent to Ellis Street would be better camouflaged if they were not in the rock beds. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination L - CITY OF BOZEMAN VBUZ�,`�t DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9x ' _ ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 s 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 co �o��e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 World wide web: www.bozeman.net FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE 1 OF 1 DATE: October 20, 2003 TO: Mary Joe Lusin FAX NUMBER: 587-3919 FROM: Jami Morris, Associate Planner RE: Northern Rockies Professional Center Site Visit for Acceptance of Improvements MESSAGE: The Planning Office conducted a site visit on October 14, 2003 to determine if all of the conditions of approval have been met for the Northern Rockies Professional Center. The following items will need to be dealt with prior to releasing the terms of the Improvements Agreement on file with the Clerk and Recorder's Office: ❑ Landscaping along the entire south property line is rock. Alternatives to turf could have been proposed but upon inquiry our office had recommended ornamental grasses. We specifically require 75% of the landscape areas to be vegetative. The landscape/open space areas are clearly more than 25% rock. Furthermore, one of the conditions of approval required additional vegetative screening along the south property line and the approved landscape plan had depicted extensive plantings along the property line. o There are no picnic tables in the open space areas. The Design Review Board's condition of approval required the incorporation of"people spaces". You proposed incorporating picnic tables and benches around the dry creek bed feature that was going to be constructed in the common open space area. ❑ Large utility boxes have been placed in the common open space. This is not an approved location for these fixtures. The boxes will need to be fully screened with an opaque material and then landscaped in order to remain in the current location. ❑ The condition of approval required all mechanical equipment to be screened from view. The green mechanical boxes adjacent to Ellis Street would be better camouflaged if they were not in the rock beds. planning 9 zoning 9 subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation 9 housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordina r � ❑ The retaining wall has no exterior finish as suggested in the approval letter for the retaining wall. The street facing side of the retaining wall in front of Lot 1 is the primary concern. Thought should also be given to the appearance of the retaining wall between Lot 4 and Lot 5. The letter of credit for the subdivision will need to be renewed until all of the improvements are satisfactorily completed. In addition, Gary Lusin's financing institution has brought to our attention a mistake in the wording of the Conditional Use Permit on file with the Clerk & Recorder's Office. The last word in the document refers to a restaurant. I have attached a copy of the modified document. It will need to be signed by both parties, notarized and recorded prior to release of the Improvements Agreement. Page 2 AM.30.2002 2'36PM CMS:O. NO.684 P.3/5 TYPE -I3' ARM.ASSY-SLA4(MODI CATALOG NUMBER ALUMINUM TUBE WPR-i CAST 24 3IA"- ALUMINUM ARM SUPPORTS. UGL-ANp K3-W AB. --�—.---------. CAST ALUM.HOUSES BALLAST i ASSEMBLY. SECURES TO FMSH:POLYESTER POWDER ARM WITH(3)WS BOLTS, COAT CHROMATE PRIMER. AAL COLOR: BLK i I TO MATCH: PROVIDE A SAMPLE COLOR CHEF LAMPING 46' SHAR€ LAMP TYPE MH 30'DIA SPUN ALUMINUM. PULSE RATED SOCKET MOGUL RSG ,TYPES ucHr WATTAGE 400 DISTRIBUTION WITH VOLTAGE MULTI TAP HORIZONTAL LAMP POSITION. F L ROTATABLE ON 90,CENTERS_ AU_SAU AWS AR1 MW CON STANT WATTAGE-W OEWWE STAPITIN0, ALLSOCKMARE _ Lf N L�f,s_FBA[IOE A,�LY PORCELAfN,PULSE RATED 4KVA CA81 ALUM,DOOR FRAME WITH )INCHOR 801.73 R E EW EQ & APPROVED GASKETED FLAT CLEAR TEMPERED OTY GLASS LENS. HINGES OPEN FOR Q EPT OF PLANi\If SERVICE AMRELAMPING. � AND 0MLI#TY DEVE's_ , rEN POST TOP FYTPER BOLT CIRCLE CAST ALUMINUM,SLIPS OVER A GIREC 1 OR 4"O.D.x6"LONG TENON. PROJECTION 6CURES WITH to)S/5 SET SCREWS FS IM OPTIONS: ❑/.kTE SLo FUSE HOLDERS ONLY. FUSS BY OTHERS. LEVEMOR NUTS AND WASSM MUST BE INVALLlM UNDER ALL ONE APPROVGD~IN$MUST BE RL'TURNED TO A,A,L,. E�' , BEFORE THIS PRODUCT CAN N O I,i 1 f'j! ti y . , . ;�..5 FAeF110ATE0. 1 WARNING;TKS FDCrJ tEMUV 1,L �# t. 5`'.,l'�,I ( ! • , i ''�`','' -,•— y„ �.�,, BE GFiptalDE9?IN AGTiORDUWCE ' r t)f , WITH LOCAL CODES OR 7K8 _ NAMOW+L ELECTRICAL CODE. r c f r I-i 1 1 �l r r.I i i �7 FAIWPX%TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SERIOUS PERSONAL INJURY, S L TOpal JOBNAME AFL C R I T E C T U R A L 14249 AnesW 0h+d P.O.Box 1669 02A-1470 LADarMd3M 90630-1869 DATE DRWN 714W4.2700 rax7l4.994-0522 4-25-02 JOSEPH O. AREA Fro DAT A PR D erveTh Resm "C np f+.� D 2 S r�Z ,i - ��waa"m>0 Pro�scs W`�an DATE llZ-d b00/f00'd !fi!-1 9N(,1H911 V3iltl 111�f1l�3iIH0tlq-uoli vE60160 ZOOZ-9Z-�dtl APR.30.2002 2:39PM CMS CO. NO.684 P.4/5 PE 'A° ARM 6o=-S 1000) CATALOG NUMBER ALUMINUM TUBE WITH CAST � 24 3W. —� ALUMINUM ARM SUPPORT& UCNI-ANG-Zia-FTGr..--•-- � sus, - ' I —.—�----.--.--. CAST ALUM.HOUSES BALLAST 02A 1469 i ASSEMBLY. SECURES TO M-POLYMS'6R POWDEF! AAM WITH(3)S/S BOLTS. COAT CHROMATE PRINIM j AAL COLOR: BLK Ii TO MATCH: PROMDE A SAMPLE COLOR CHIP CAMPING 46" SHADE LAMP TYPE ' MH W DIA.SPUN ALUMINUM. PULSE RATED SOCKET MEDIUM REFLECTOR WATTAGE 175 SEGMENTED.TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION WITH VpLTAGE MULTI-TAP HORIZONTAL LAMP POSITION. ROTATABLE ON 900 CENTERS. ALL BAU.PZMAMHPFCON. ST4NT WATTAGE 40 DEGREE STARTING. AL L SOC}EIS ARE POR(Na AIN.PULSE HATED 4KVA CAST ALUM.DOOR FRAME WITH ANCHOR BOLrs GASKErED FLAT CLEAR TEMPERED QTY GLASS LENS. HINGES OPEN FOR SERVICE AND AF-LAMPING. SIZE EMT YOp pmnR 80LT CIRCLE CAST ALUMINUM,SLIPS OVER A 4'G.D.7t 6'LONG TENON. PROJECTION SECURES WITH(6)S1S SET SCREWS MIM OPnONS: FUSE HOLDERS ONLY. FUSES BY OTHERS. LEVELING NUYSAND WASFIERS MUST BE INSTALLED UNDER ONE APPRO W DRAWING MUST BE RMRNED TO A.A.L. BEFORETH S PRODUCT CAN BE FABRICATED. WAANtNG:THIS AXTURE MUST BE GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES OR THE NATIONAL ELECMCAL COD5. FAILURE TO DO$O MAY RESULT IN SERIOVS PER90NAL INJURY, SOLD TO PO# JOB NAME AR C H I T L C T U It A L 14249 Amcaia Blvd P.O.Boa 18ti9 02A-I 469 LA Nlrocta CA. W636-180 DATE wWN n4-9k-2700 [=714rW-0522 4-25-02 JOSEPH O• AREA DATE APPRVO ArC11tIeGGt�M1 A000 0r�trrc Reaero4aTMl9ipnL oCAantte —.2 —v Menutaehxing racam6wil out DATE FIEV-- -- H T I N G notKe. IlZ-� gOD/Z00'd !b!-1 91II1N911 tl38d 1tlIlA19311H�IN-��d areeD180 ZOOl�9d-ldv I i gPR.30.2002 Z 39PhiCW CO. N0.684 P.5i5 TYPE 'C° ARld ASW(-Mh&g(MOM CATALOG NUMBER ALUMWW TUBE WITH CAST ALUMINUM ARM SUPPORTS. VCL-ANG-N $LA4,.,2_ MA4 47'f QQ CAST ALUM.HOUSES BALLAST ASSEMBLY. SECURE$TO �tws�.poLYe Pawot;a AAM WITH(9)S/S BOLTS. coat ctlROnaarE>'plllAF.R. j AAL COLOR: SLK vz" TO MATCH: ! P ROVIDE A SAMPLE WLOfi*UP LAWING LAMP TYPE MH PULSE RATED SOCKET MOGUL WATTAGE 400 VOLTAGE MULTI TAP ALL BALEASt''AqE MPF� STAW WATTA6l;%M DEISM ST&MINQ ALL SOCKETS At POAI�EI M,PULSE AATF.D AKVA. 30'qtA SPUN ALUMINUM. ANCHOR 00L19 j cm aE>:�cToa SEGMEtVTED,TYPE 3 LIGHT SIZE 1 DISTRIBUTION WITH HORIZONTAL LAMP POSITION. BOLT URCLE ROTATABLE"ON 908 CENTERS. PROAnON 1-6blo MAME ASSEMBLY FS1 OPTIONS: CAST ALUM.DOOR FRAME WITH FUSE HOLDERS ONLY. GASKUM FIAT CLEAR TEMPERED FUSES BY 07FlEAS. GLASS LENS. HINGES OPEN FOR LEVEUNG NUTS AND WASHEM SERVICE AND RELAMPINC. MUSTBE INSTALLED UNM ALLem ONE APPROVED ORAWING MUST POS'T TOP FITTER BE RSTUFWED TO AAL.. CAST ALUMINUM,SLIPS OVER A SWORE THIS PRODUCT CAN BE 4'O.D.x 64 TANG TENON. FABRWATED_ SECURE=$WITH(b)S!S SET SCREWS WARMING; THIS FIXTURE MM BE GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE Wmi LOCAL CODES OA THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE FAILURE TO 00 80 MAY RESULT IN SERIOUS PEF=NAL INJURY, SOLD Q ON 14240 ArtcOa Blvd D.O.Box 180 02A-1472 A R C H I T C Z U R A i. is 2WWOL CA 90MISM DATE WN 714A94.2700 tax71449"S22 4-2S-02 JOSSPH 0. AREA DATE APPRVD AfChi�8EW�1 AM, htC. .-. Pawrva The atnl o c -2 -v z_ llZ-� �00/1.00'd lY�-1 2132479 Papa:19/1 of '' 11l2003 0 [tZATT I II I II I I I II y V Shelley Vanoe-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 24.00 - J CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NORTHERN ROCKIES SUBDIVISION, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON ELLIS STREET,BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, this document supersedes the previous Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use Permit on file with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office for Northern Rockies Subdivision, document number 2045889, dated August 20, 2001; and i WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional i Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for a 7-lot medical office and professional office complex; and i WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177C, SE3, SW3, Section 8, T2S, R6E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following thirteen (13) i conditions and code provisions: 1. The subdivision shall provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 2. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. j 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 4. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking,pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 1 NW39P 9 I Shelley Vanoe-Gallatin Co MT MISC 24.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman(Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 8. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the commencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of Planning Department approval. 11. Seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six months of the date of approval. Code Provisions: 12. Per Section 18.65.0703 "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 2 L . • 21 79 I Paee: 4 I I II I 1 I 111 01.38P Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 24.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted thirteen (13) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a medical and professional office complex. i DATED THIS a DAY OF i! , 20n33. i LANDOWNER i By: ohn mpbell Campbell, LLC STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this a a'day of 2003 before me,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared John Campbell, known to me to be the Q-t....rn_2/_\ of Campbell,LLC,the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) !tA ......... °V �i1ii- Notary Public for the State of `� CJ •. cPA ,•{ �'}, Residing: "' •• Commission Expires: ............ `- Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 3 2132 II I Papa: 4 of III 11/19/2003P Shelley Vance-Gallatin Cc MT MISC 24.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LANDOWNER By: Gary Lusin Gary F. Lusin, LLC STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this ;�p day of pc ,her ,200 3,before me,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Gary Lusin, known to me to be the C)wj\e'�' of Gary F. Lusin,LLC,the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of r1� r\+a no`. Residing: ✓ ze rye n Commission Expires: (f-30-agrYo i Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 4 Northern Rockies Professional. Center To: City of Bozeman Planning and Zoning Department Attn: Jami Subject: Proposed improvements and signage for Northern Rockies Professional Center Dear Jami Enclosed please find the copies of the proposed improvements to be made to the Professional Center. Including 1) The designs for the utility enclosure for the site electrical meter and control boxes. 2) The Dryvit sample for the concrete retaining walls facing Ellis Street. 3) The sign design and placement for the two entrances signs on Ellis Street. 4) The design for the guardrail on the retaining wall at the east entrance. 5) The proposed methods of hiding phone and electrical boxes on Ellis St. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me. We are striving to make the appearance of the complex professional_ and memorable. We are trying to accent the natural and unique beauty of the Gallatin Valley mixed with architectural aspects from though out the west, with an eye on the budget. Your comments and suggestions are welcomed and appreciated. Curtice Thompson 522-1157 APR - 1 2004 DEPARTMENT Of PLANNING AND CMviMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jami, This is a sample drawing of the end appearance of the monument sign at the West Entrance to the complex. The monument base will be drystack stone with cast caps on each of the pillars. The sign will be Internally lit. The sign at the East entrance will be identical except it will be mounted directly to the retaining wall, instead of having a monument base. See attached sketch for height and dimensions. 1 do have a question; does the top of the sign have to be at a maximum of 5 foot or the top of the mountain outline? he East entrance sign will be facing Ellis St. the West entrance monument sign will be angled so that It can be seen not only from Ellis St. but also from Highland Blvd. by cars heading south. kN RI) UN PRO - 1011'�" . i . _a q �r� 1 "s'w 1YY .. '�.f � ,"3's• °�.cap -* i Y 1475, ¢ ai tj w .0 , 'fi w PROPOSED ENCLOSURE FOR THE SITE LIGHTING AND SPRINKLER CONTROLS THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS REPRESENT THE PROPOSED ENCLOSURE FOR THE SITE UTILITIES. IT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 1"X4"X6' DOG-EAR CEDAR ON A 2"X6" REDWOOD FRAME. TWO 6"X6" REDWOOD POSTS WILL BE SET AT THE FRONT CORNERS, THE TWO EXISTING 8"X8" POSTS WILL SUPPORT THE BACK OF THE ENCLOSURE. THE OVERALL ENCLOSURE SIZE WILL BE 10, WIDE, 4' DEEP AND 6' HIGH WITH TWO 4'6"WIDE DOORS ON THE FRONT TO ALLOW UNRESTRICTED ACCESS TO THE ENCLOSED CONTROL AND UTILITY BOXES. i i I TWO 4'-6" DOORS WITH LATCH IN MIDDLE • 6' HIGH "r LL -L -HLL - - -L 100 LENGTH FRONT VIEW i ■ II ■ ■ Z v rn 106 LENGTH 6' HIGH BACK VElW Please see the enclosed sample of the dryvit finish proposed to cover the retaining wall at the Northern Rockies Professional Center. The finish will be intentionally rough to add more depth and character to the face of the wall. The end effect and color will be the same as what was applied to the retaining wall on the north exterior staircase at Bridger Orthopedic. 18 ' 2" LENGTH 7 EACH 38 " FDIMINISION 0" INSIDE HIGH 6" ON CENTERS FOR ELEVATION JOG LENGTH TO BE DETERMINED 1 EACH 3811 HIGH HANDRAIL WILL CONSIST OF 7 EACH 18'-2"LONG STRAIGHT PANELS WITH ONE CORNER SECTION(PAGE 2)AND ONE ELEVATION JOG SECTION.ALL SECTIONS WILL BE 2"STEEL BOX BEAM WITH STEEL MESH WELDED TO THEM TO MEET THE 4"PASS THRU REQUIREMENTS.THEY WILL BE INTE ,AN ANCHORED TO THE RETAINING WALL WITH EXPANSION AN .THE OVERALL EFFECT WILL BE SIMILAR TO THE HANDRAIL AROUND THE DECK ADVANCED PERFORMANCE AND REHABILITATION SERVICES BUILDING. CJ?�f FOR CORNER LENGTHS TO BE DETERMINED 1 EACH 900 38" HIGH Proposed methods of hiding Phone, Fiber Optic and Electrical boxes along Ellis St. The Phone and Fiber Optic Boxes will be disguised as rocks. See attached sample photos. These are fiberglass shells designed to go over the boxes and look like part of the landscaping. They can be lifted off for utility access but are sturdy and heavy enough to withstand the weather. The finished rocks will be patterned after existing rocks in our present landscaping. Digital photos will be sent in of the existing rocks and the manufacturer will match the coloring and texture to the size needed to make the fake rocks blend in. The larger Electrical Distribution boxes are another problem. There are two of them facing Ellis St. The fake rock approach creates a couple of concerns. First the size would look out of place. Second the weight would create a safety hazard if the power company needed to access them in case of emergency. The other option would be to put in bushes or a block wall. They are close to the sidewalk and putting something in front of them would hinder the power companies access. tr _ � • , � \ ��/. �/����' '-e \ w •�~� , \� / • F K {, .�� � �s �x S, 7 •.� t4 yy��� � K 1• ���!`� e I ILI,ell � � . �v� - � �. .- - . �«\�}���� z � � . � . - » � » +� %A . \} , / � � � � . . ^ . . . � 3� � ® � � . � < �� � . .\. � � / � ��; . . � � . / \ � \/ � ` , .��� j/� « ƒ§ � . [ ��` ��. � ��� w\� fir\ § ^ �\�� \ | Cip OF BOZEMAN ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net December 12, 2003 Gary Lusin 1532 Ellis Street Bozeman,MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies Professional Center Improvements Dear Gary: I believe there has been a miscommunication on my part that I wish to clarify. During our last discussion you questioned whether a rail needed to be installed on top of the retaining wall on the east end of the property. I indicated to you that I wasn't familiar with the depth of the wall and the height of the wall but that I also wasn't aware of a condition of approval that would require the installation of the rail. However, after discussion with Engineering Staff and the Building Department it does appear that the rail is required. I have attached the section of the Uniform Building Code for your reference. Respectfully, Jami Morris, Associate Planner cc: John Campbell, 1450 Ellis Street,Bozeman, MT 59715 Morrison-Maierle Inc.,P.O. Box 1113,Bozeman,MT 59771 planning • zoning --subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination 12/10/2003 15:11 FAX 406 587 1176 MORRISON-MAIERLE CITY ENG 21001 E:1 Engineers r� MORRISON Scientists Planners ®® MMERL-E, INC. Surveyors Box 1113 901 Technology Blvd. Bozeman, MT 59771 Phone: .(406) 587-0721 Fax: (406) 587-1176 low A TO: wwww y1kMMM FAX NO.: FROM: DATE: JOB NO.: PAGES: RE: �. CC: ❑Urgent XFor Review ❑Please Comment ❑Please Reply ,,*or Your Use mop A WjW& L4W.W 6c" Pla jr AAA-AAAA Am AIRPORTS HIGHWAYS CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING STRUCTURES SURVEYING WATER WASTEWATER WATER RESOURCES i 12/10/2003 15:11 FAX 406 587 1176 MORRISON-MAIERLE CITY ENG 10 002 J 507 1997 UNIFO UILDING CODE 509.3 hour for unenclosed mezzanines.The clear height above and be- ECTION 509-GUARD�ll�B"" low the mezzanine floor construction shall not be less than 7 feet _�,� -^ 1 (2134 mm). 509. equ11�it d. Unenclosed floor and roof openings, open and glazed sides of stairways, aisles, landings and ramps, 2. There shall not be more than two levels of mezzanines in a balconies or porches,which are more than 30 inches(762 mm) room.However,there is no limitation on the number of mezza- above grade or floor below,and roofs used far other than service of nines within a room. the building shall be protected.by a guardrail.Guardrails shall be 3. The aggregate area of mezzanines within a room shall not provided at the ends of aisles where they terminate at a fascia of exceed one third of the area of the room in which they are located. boxes,balconies and galleries. 4.All portions of a mezzanine shall be open and unobstructed to EXCEPTION: Guardrails need not be provided at the following locations: 4 the room in which they are located,except for columns and posts r, and protective walls or railings not more than 44 inches(1118 1. On the loading side of loading docks. mm)in height. 2. On the auditorium side of a stage,raised platforms and other raised floor areas such as runways,ramps and side stages used for en- EXCEPTIONS:1.Partitioning may be installed if either of the fol- tertainment or presentation.Along the side of an elevated walking sur- lowing conditions exist: face when used for the normal functioning of special lighting or for 1.1 The aggregate floor area of the enclosed space does not exceed access and use of other special equipment.At vertical openings in the 10 percent of the mezzanine area,or performance area of stages. 1.2 The occupant load of the enclosed area of the mezzanine does 3. Along vehicle service pits not accessible to the public. not exceed 10. 509.2 Height. The top of guardrails shall not be less than 2.A mezzanine having two or more means of egress need not be 42 inches(1067 mm)in height. open into the room in which it is located,provided at least one of the ' means of egress gives direct access to a protected corridor,exit court EXCEPTIONS:1.The top of guardrails for Group R,Division 3 ;1 or exit. and Group U,Division 1 Occupancies and interior guardrails within 3.In industry facilities,mezzanines used for control equipment may individual dwelling units,Group R,Division 3 congregate residences be glazed on all sides. and guest rooms of Group R,Division 1 Occupancies may be 36 inches (914 mm)in height. 5. Two means of egress shall be provided from a mezzanine 2.The top of guardrails on a balcony immediately in front of the first when two are required by Table 10-A. row of fixed seats and that are not at the end of an aisle may be 6.If any required means of egress enters the room below,the oc- 26 inches(660 mm)in height. cupant load of the mezzanine shall be added to the occupant load 3.The top of guardrails for stairways,exclusive of their landings, of the room in which it is located. may have a height as specified in Section 1003.3.3.6 for handrails. Where an elevation change of 30 inches(762 mm)or less occurs between an aisle parallel to the seats(cross aisle)and the adjacent SECTION 508-FIRE-RESISTIVE SUBSTITUTION floor or grade below,guardrails not less than 26 inches(660 mm) When an approved automatic sprinkler system is not required above the aisle floor shall be provided. throughout a building by other sections of this code,it may be used EXCEPTION:Where the backs of seats on the front of the cross in a building of Type II One-hour,Type III One-bour and Type V aisle project 24 inches(610 mm)or more above the adjacent floor of One-hour construction to substitute for the one-hour fire-resistive the aisle,a guardrail need not be provided. construction.Such substitution shall not waive or reduce the re- The top of guardrails at the ends of aisles terminating at the fas- quired fire-resistive construction for: cia of boxes,balconies and galleries shall extend for the width of 1. Occupancy separations Section 302.3 , the aisle and be no closer than 42 inches(1067 mm)to the closest P Y P ( ) surface of the aisle where there are steps and 36 inches(914 mm) 2. Exterior wall protection due to proximity of property lines otherwise. (Section 503.2). 509.3 Openings. Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails 3. Area separations(Section 504.6). or an ornamental pattern such that a sphere 4 inches(102 mm)in 4. Dwelling unit separations(Section 310.2.2) diameter cannot pass through. 5. Shaft enclosures(Section 711). EXCEPTIONS: 1.The open space between the intermediate rails or ornamental pattern of guardrails in areas of commercial and t, 6. Corridors(Sections 1004.3.4.3.1 and 1004.3.4.3.2). industrial-type occupancies which are not accessible to the public may ' be such that a sphere 12 inches(305 mm)in diameter cannot pass 7. Stair enclosures(Section 1005.3.3). through. 8. Exit passageways(Section 1005.3.4). 2.The triangular openings formed by the riser,tread and bottom ele- ment of a guardrail at the open side of a stairway may be of such size 9. Type of construction separation(Section 601.1). that a sphere 6 inches(152 mm)in diameter cannot pass through. 10. Boiler, central heating plant or hot-water supply boiler For guardrail requirements at grandstands,bleachers or other room enclosures(Section 302.5). elevated seating facilities,see Section 1008.5.7.. i e t 7�54 r -- -_ - �-c�c� � � / r BOZO CITY OF BOZEMAN V 9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * _ ` Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 Co Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net May 30, 2003 Tom Henesh Morrison-Maierle, Inc. P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 Re: Northern Rockies PUD- Parking Lot/Drive Approach Modification Dear Tom: On May 29, 2003 the Planning Director approved the proposed modifications for the Northern Rockies Professional Center. The Development Review Committee evaluated the proposed modifications but did not have any overwhelming concerns with the elimination of the middle drive approach and the construction of a retaining wall. However, City Staff members suggest you keep in mind the depth of the paving in association with the depth of the manholes, we recommend that the slope of the new private sidewalk follow ADA requirements for running slope and consideration should be given for the appearance of the wall from the streetscape. Use of natural materials (i.e., rock or masonry products) for the face of the wall-is strongly encouraged but not required. If you have any further questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner cc: Campbell/Lusin, LLC, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 planning zoning subdivision review annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination �_ �o �-� / Week of DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: S 20 O3 PROJECT NAME: ICI o r—+L V4 CCmc '1 , a„o PREPARED BY: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner FILE#:7--- oo/-7/q APPLICANTS/REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: DRC MEMBERS PRESENT: ©UX 0-1 , Project Engineer 0"J hn Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent ❑Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official Nave Skelton, Senior Planner ;VJ hn Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Greg Megaard, Fire Marshal Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: �. �'1 Cxx t l Lk-at -U k in AINh-4 I (c�✓a� - h.ao-aL Approved/Denied to Boz, CITY OF BOZEMAN V 9� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 0 ' �v 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 co �o?'�e Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Koltz, Engineering Department John Alston, Water/Sewer Department FROM: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner RE: Northern Rockies PUD-Parking Lot/Drive Approach Modification APPROVED FINAL SITE PLAN MODIFICATION DATE: May 30, 2003 Attached you will find the signed and approved modified Final Site Plan, for the removal of the middle drive approach and construction of a retaining wall, for your records. Thank you. JM/jm planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation historic preservation • housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination v k C E M AY - 8 2003 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CO`-NNTY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF BOZEMAN �— DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 (406) 582-2260 FAX (406) 582-2263 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION OF A PLAN APPROVED AFTER THE FEBRUARY 12, 1990 ADOPTION OF THE BOZEMAN ZONING ORDINANCE Per Section 18.52.070.13, Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, amendment or modifications of a plan approved after the February 12,1990 adoption of the Zoning Ordinance shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review, and may be approved by the Director upon finding that the amended plan is in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan, or the application must be resubmitted as a new application, and shall be subject to all plan review and approval provisions of the Ordinance. A revised plan, drawn to scale, must be submitted which clearly shows the amendment/modification. l. Name and mailing address of property owner: iH5+, QG. . SJI T(, 2,010, 1S"4o- ,J Phone: 587:0/2y 2. Name and mailing address of applicant: IK.C4?tS.,J f4AM� (�. i'k).r Sg77/ Phone: !967- a7Z1 3. Address of property to be altered: o o At- /5o%Cm J&?— 4. Name of Business (if applicable): IV amu" &x4" P2oFfe c-i,- A-t- C*.Pj 5. Explanation of amen dment/modificaatti-on: e-t 1/jOrQ,JC.tNfb GO'rr f�(LstC6�, t �-k�✓�o✓Fh� aF ST��P F�JrfLAJ1�c-Fi I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Applicant's Signature As owner of record of the above\described property, I hereby certify that I do not oppose the submittal of this application, and would not object to the proposed amendment/modification of said property as described herein. k Pr ty Owner's Signature April 2003 1 ` APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION OF PLAN APPROVED AFTER 2/12/50 I i i_ r REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR Based on the information submitted with this a , and a review of other pertinent information, I hereby find that the amended ROW IS S NOT (Circle One) in substantial compliance with the originally approved pla amended plan is not in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan, the proposal shall be subject to all plan review and approval provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Director COMMENTS/CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: April 2003 2 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENUMODIFICATION OF PLAN APPROVED AFTER 2/12/50 so2� CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * _ * Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 -_- = }` 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 tt r. l 8 o?�e Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net CO. Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net May 30, 2003 Becki Klempel Bayliss Architects 212 South Tracy Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Northern Rockies PUD- Coffee Shop Dear Becki: As we discussed previously on the telephone a coffee shop would be an appropriate use for the Northern Rockies Professional Center. The Planning Director has indicated that the use as depicted would be accessory to the primary professional office uses permitted in the Planned Unit Development. However, no exterior building signage would be permitted in order for the business to be evaluated as an accessory use. Otherwise, the use appears complimentary to the uses of the complex. If you have any further questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, �atA.,UL Jami Morris Assistant Planner planning • Zoning subdivision review • annexation historic preservation housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination ba iss May 13, 2003 Jamie Morris City of Bozeman Planning Department PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Re: Informal Staff review of Coffee Shop Lot#2 N.R.P.C. Dear Jamie Morris, In June of 2002, we discussed the possibility of Gary Lusin wanting a coffee shop/lunch cart to accommodate the occupants in his building. This would be similar to what is currently provided in their current location at the Medical Arts Building. He has found an interested party to lease approximately 100 square feet in the lower level. Attached is a floor plan along with a menu. Please review and let me know how best to approach this proposal. I know last year we discussed a couple of different options: accessory use, modification to the P.U.D., or a zoning change. We would like to know the easiest, quickest solution. Also,please provide any conditions; including signage, parking etc. Sincerely, Becki Klempel, AIA Associate Bayliss Architects,P.C.,212 South Tracy Avenue,Bozeman,MT59715 406 586-5007 11 406 585-8337 www.baylissarchitects.com • • Bayliss Architects. P.C. (Phone)406-586-5007 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 (Fax)406-585-8337 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Bayliss ATTN: Planning Department DATE: 05.13.03 COMPANY: City of Bozeman PROJECT#: 2238 FROM: Becki Klempel RE: Advanced Performance & Rehab. WE ARE SENDING YOU: XPRINTS ❑ ORIGINALS ❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑SHOP DRAWINGS [—]OTHER ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ AS REQUESTED []RETURN COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 05.13.03 Letter 1 Sketches of Proposed Floor Plan 1 Coffee Shop Menu REMARKS: CC: THANK YOU, 03/01/03 TAU 10:14 FAX 140608692 DELANEY & CO. • Q 001 DELANEY & COMPANY 101 East Main Street Phone'? (406) 586-3132 Bozeman,Montana 59715 Fax: (406) 586-8692 Email: delancynco@cuthlink.net To: planning Board From: Michael W. Delaney Company: City of Bozeman Number of Pages: 1 Includiag Cover Sheet Fax #: 582-2263 Date: May t 2003 Re: 2020 Plan Dear Planning Board Members: We would like to change the:2020 Master Plan as indicated below. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. Business Park: This classification provides for areas typified by office uses and technology-oriented light industrial uses, although retail, services, or industrial uses may also be included in an accessory or local service role. "Within this.business Park classification, we encourage the master planning and development of a wide variety of mixed uses if planned into an integrated. campus or village development These uses then may be expanded to include: Hotels, Convention Centers,Restaurants, Bars (non gaming, non-smoking, a wide variety of retail, commercial, entertainment, recreational uses (golf,folf, trails, tennis, ice skating, athletic clubs) which will appeal to the local population and encourage tourism development.." Very Truly Yours, Michael W. Delaney c: Andy Eppel Chris Saunders Clark Johnson Mayor Steve Kirchhoff&City Commissioners MENU for THE GRIND COFFEE BAR AND LUNCH STOP Each day, Mon through Fri, there will be a choice of two soups, two sandwiches, two salads Beverages: Coffee drinks, teas, bottled juices, smoothies (fruit,juice, yogurt), soda Snacks: Packaged candy, ice cream treats, popsicles, chips MID MORNING SNACK ITEMS: Bagels/cream cheese Muffins Biscotti Cookies Fresh Fruit Yogurt The above items will be purchased already made from local bakery or food wholesaler. LUNCH SANDWICHES CLUB Ingredients: Turkey Bacon Lettuce Guacamole ROAST BEEF Ingredients: Roast Beef Lettuce Cheese HAM Ingredients: Ham Onion Cream cheese Alfalfa sprouts ITALIAN Ingredients: Pastrami Salami Pepperoni Cheese Lettuce VEGETABLE Ingredients: Cheese Sprouts Cucumber Onions Tomato Avocado SALADS GARDEN SALAD Ingredients: Mixed Greens Cherry Tomatoes Shredded Carrot Croutons CAESAR SALAD Ingredients: Romaine Lettuce Croutons Parmesan Cheese PEAR WALNUT SALAD Ingredients: Mixed Greens Pears Walnuts Feta Cheese BLACK FOREST HAM SALAD Ingredients: Romaine lettuce Black Forest Ham Red Onions All the above salads will have salad dressings that will have oil, various vinegars, etc. The salad dressings will be stored in separate individual serving containers. SOUPS POTATO SOUP Ingredients: Potato Celery Onion Chicken Broth Milk WE WILL PURCHASE FROZEN CLAM CHOWDER FROM FOOD WHOLESALER> FRENCH ONION Ingredients: Beef Broth Onions Cheese B read LAMB BARLEY Ingredients: Lamb Chicken Broth Pearl Barley Onion BROCCOLI CHEESE Ingredients: Milk Broccoli Cheese Chicken Broth CHICKEN NOODLE Ingredients: Chicken Broth Precooked chicken Noodles Carrots Celery Onions CREAM OF CARROT Ingredients: Chicken Broth Milk Cooked Carrots Onions CHICKEN MUSHROOM WILD RICE Ingredients: Chicken Broth Onions Wild Rice Precooked Chicken Celery Milk All the above will have spices and seasoning that are prepared commercially. 1 ory Hllls I J.Ip.rst i D Tamarack 5t. LEI �^'I MPan 9t �❑❑❑ Y E D LL ♦` r .�� Z Pea N�>DEJEJ�❑❑❑❑D CITY LIMITS a ❑ D ^ r ———————————————————————————————————— Q®❑ ` sro st 8 (Q ®D 37G � RI 0❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ c❑ QQ • Be st 1 ❑�0❑®A= : D °cam 1 t st ❑ a =c �oE DoD000DD FM ; ���'y� ash � ck 5 ©�❑❑❑❑❑❑a Babcock 9t < Babcock St 0 ❑❑❑❑❑J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ OGurtlae9tm UEGu » ❑ ❑ ❑ � g LJ ❑❑O s Sto S ❑❑0 t m m Story R ❑ ❑�Dlc n SL ❑n❑❑❑ C] Story SL _ �C] ❑ ❑® Ale so st ❑n❑❑ r `o �_C70 I a ❑O col e t ❑D❑❑❑ m Elna 5L / � �n 3 7 QUO❑O❑❑❑❑ vlrginle Dr. t ❑ ❑ Gev a Ice Pond Re. O— ce2 ea SC G V Ia S ,/� ��.• � d ,auan Ln MONTA r ms a��D a❑ Haggerty Ln all STATE a t ©❑ i <' ` r1 �Robn Ln (� � Q . a f �� Lln n t a� m _ -C J L— m° UNI1/ER TY D Q f 1- , Nol Or. g s 'uneeH 60l en moue wag °tea •P .N 1 L ———J N.Rnecr et �enat• °4"o°r.vr. <° '�\ `°� �• ccole I � Y p 5 Plnecreat 5 t�� B Dr. I ya` 3 Star Lane o I N ' dc'o H.eedarview t t e m P Blue erouee et t41 �. —J� sudrdea I Ea le ° uJ Ka Blvd. 1 BaW ewe 9y / 1 S/ N.s race real court ��m a s s In IL 1 / m uln 9t I , eherr a Bozeman rrao rtd � Kagy Blvd. Kagy Blvd.ov roo 4 m e° / s 4 VICINITY MAP A NO 5GALE z D 0 AOL u° o � DO � N C � � r rn m U 0 o p z � rn rn wi l� ° 0 Z r n rn z rn 0 0 J � L r 0 --� ° 0 i O I Q r 0 70o m D x a 0 r _ a FO r0l � v m LLL 7- r 5 P P O x x A ❑ Z rn no N � N < Orn rrnn p rn Z rn rn • to = _ rnN A O O N d� NIA i L p ® 0 0 Q 4 Wo Z a n IL te PLANT LIST 1 j 0 9ymbd Botanical Name Common Name CITY. PLANTING SIZE MATURE HT.MATUR 51-R. n y TREES m p • Acer sac charum'Green Mountaln' Green Mountain Maple 56 2 Ga. 35 ceLlrTt�rlcum Tatarian Maple 39 8..-ht. 25' 20 Grataegus crus-galll Inermis'Cruzam' Crusader Hawthorn 5 6'O 15 1 Picea�Ungens Colorado Green Spruce 21 10'ht. 50' 2_V Poppu r le[us tremuloldes 0uaking Aspen 22 1 P 6'Ga1. 60' 3 It [us saudoaeaala'Pu Robe' Purple Robe Locust 25 2'Gal. 40' 3d _ a cor a s Greensp re reen5plre LinOCn 5 S a SaW SHRUBS Acer glnnala Compact Gompae Amur Maple 2:. Euonumus alatus Burning Bush 2 GeL 5' -li vurrmio JunJun pew a. Physocerpus��o ullfolius'Darts bold Darts Gold Ninebark 2 Gal. 6' Rose rugosa'Therese Bugnet' T erese Bugne Rosa 2 6a. 5 rin a me erl Palibin' Dwarf Korean Lilac 2 Gal. 4' w NOTE:TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING5 SHOWN WITHIN BUILPIN6 LOTS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST. NOTE:ALL LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. V v O • � V1 SHRUB PLANTING SHRUB PLANTIN05 LOW PROFILE AGERG.'COMPACTA' EUONYMU5 ALATUS ENTRY 51GN SNOW REMOVAL SOD LAWN PHYSOGARPUS O.'DARTS GOLD' JUNIPERUS 5.'5UFFALO' STORAGE AREA SHRUB PLANTINGS R05A R'THERE5E BUGNET EUONYMU5 ALATUS 5YRINGA M.PALBIN O JUNIPERU5 5.•BUFFALO' GARBAGE O ENCLOSURE -- 1OI�PRtl'PLE'- 6ARBA6E BOULDERS FF 1 15 S 1ZF—,T. ENTRY57GIY £NCLOSURE `P•` - ^ , BOULDERS SHRUB PLANTING BERM AGER 6.'0OMPAGTA' (1'O"CONTOURS) _ - .GOP PHYSOCARPUS O.'DARTS GOLD' - ;l_ LAWNS 0D LAW N - LIMIT OF — LOT TYr. LAWN' •, PROPERTY BERM LOW PROFILE 5 """' 7 s. (1'O'CONTOURS) ENTRY SIGN �, is-.. ..:. ,. ': � -..;_.- '•- ,.. ��.<: SLaOW REMOy`L+ E � �, LINE TYP. O SHRUB PLANTING5 STORAGE.4REA I .. EUONYMUS ALATUS - ,;.. nt.• « JUNIPERUS 5.'BUFFALO' + SOD VISION _• SNOW REMOVAL ^'1 V 4 , • M t Lr� TRIANGLE TORA6E AREA TYP. BOULDERS I - \q `4 rw d d" rc'r, f ICST 5 .I LOW PROFILE r r � -. t e IOT 3 v T^ rVTll y.`.. ale, V l FJ-1 DRY a ONP SIG f , \ •,,., __; i „ ; .. SIG - BENCHE e SHOW 1i - STORAGE AREA , REMOVAL 4'0 E t ail 1 • SNOW REMOV '" 9 ., ,":. - •.a.,.s <,.: TORA6EA A\ STORAGE AREA SNOW REMOVAL a •� STORAGE AREA LOW PROFILE a SIGN ' CTA BUILDING SIONA6E TYP. r51GN x )*..,. b7 ,- �, a � 0 I.a WORKGROUP S ��l r BILLINCS�FIISSOULA ' .: ,t ,i.; r � v" • .,,„•. :Y. � xt `atr: .."e,.:� BO150•GReAT PALL6 Y. H n ? hI'�.• :n ':•.'�' J;'R� I ALL RIGHTS HYSERVBD v ar_ -.P.:. ,{ r.•��z ,ri4 r E s A.. II '1 DRAWN BY- Ao TABLES(2) •?_A.. GARBAGE CHECKED BY: sR a-^�• ^.. L ENCLOSURE F-1 2001 DRY STREAM n K ,� �' , POLDER - ,,rL,y°`3 DATE: JAN.1 F MLr.+ OT � } 10 T j GTA a NRMLS SNOW REMOVAL • - 1 CADD FILE:NRLSL 101 10 1.1 ->, _STORAGE AREA \ } r�„ '✓' - 1; PIR: - I T 1 c �93 bavliss GARBAGE c p cam ENCLOSURE ;,. , - AJ $4 r� r: .. +.:.. _... .. ..�....._. ... ,..:,'.-.. ..., , ... .._ :, Fes... :... �- _ _,. Ax, �.,. a• > �,.- r`s a. L >:...� -�..-. .. -w - - .-.,,.• .. n?, ... :' ,. `. ;.. ,.. _.. _ _.. BAYLI55 ARONITEOTS.P.G SNOW REMOVAL LIMIT OF SNOW REMOVAL CURB d - SNOW REMOVAL BAYU55ARLXITEG'f5f OM SNOW REMOVAL BOZEMAK MONTANA PROPERTY IINE STORAGE AREA LOT TYP. STORAGE AREA 50D LAWN GUTTER TYP. SNOW REMOVAL STORAGE AREA 50D LAWN CONCRETE FEATURE BUIILRDING VEMENT STORAGE AREA 5TORA&E AREA SIDEWALK TYP. ENTRIES TYP. GARBAGE GARBAGE ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE SHRUB PLANTING(STREAM a POND AREA) JUNIPERU5 5.'BUFFALO' PRELIMINARY ROSA R-THERESE BUGNET LANDSCAPE, 5YRINGA M.PALBIN , S PLAN LEGAL DESCREP'70N SC ALE:1'-40' Tract C,Cer ificate of St--.yNo.1177C located in SE 114,SW 1/4,Section 8,T.2 S.,E.6 E.of P.M.M., Gallatin County,Modena SHEET L101-2 I of I 0 0 0 4 0 Q Message Page 1 of 1 Jami Morris From: Andy Epple Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:15 PM To: Patricia Day-Moore; Jami Morris Subject: FW: Northern Rockies Lighting -----Original Message----- From: Clark Johnson Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:21 PM To: Andy Epple Subject: RE: Northern Rockies Lighting There is a relationship between the concessions and the light fixtures (hard to believe but ok). If it is a PUD guideline then they go through the process to modify a PUD and take their chances. We let DRB be the taste police not us. -----Original Message----- From: Andy Epple Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:12 AM ' To: Patricia Day-Moore; Clark Johnson Cc: Jami Morris Subject: Northern Rockies Lighting I've got calls into both Gary Lusin and John Campbell to discuss their lighting issues . They are both out of town on Spring break (are we the only ones left here???). They'll call me next week, I'm sure. The lighting issue as I understand it is this. As part of their PUD they proposed to use a very attractive street and parking light fixture that staff and DRB were very pleased with. Ultimately, the PUD was approved by the Commission with this fixture specified in the guidelines. They (Campbell and Lusin) intended to install all of the light fixtures throughout the PUD with initial development of the subdivision. They have learned that installing all the lights at once on their tab is a very expensive proposition...quite a bit more than they were counting on (poor communication from their architect, I surmise...). So they approached our office about modifying the specified light fixtures. Staff was luke warm on the alternative proposal. We took it to DRB and they concurred, that the proposed alternative light fixtures were not in keeping with the high quality character of the overall PUD. The proposed fixtures have been described to me as "low end cheap"—a long way from the high end fixture originally proposed. The PUD, when built out, will be quite dense and the developers got a number of regulatory concessions from setbacks, etc. Staff and DRB feel that high quality lighting was one of the important design elements that warranted the granting of concessions. Staff has advised Gary and John that their options include: proposing a more intermediate quality fixture for us to look at (they say there are none out there on the market, but that's the architect talking); or having each lot owner-developer be responsible for installing their own lights, spreading out the cost instead of front-ending it all. There may be other options. We could bring the question back to the City Commission, but as I understand it, their current proposal would not come forward with a favorable recommendation from DRB. So that's the synopsis. Let me know if either of you have any thoughts on the subject. I'll let you know how my conversations go with the guys next week. 3/18/2002 �0g 802� CITY OF BOZEMAN v 9� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2360 t ==- - l� 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2363 c1 883 0�� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co.M Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board FROM: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner DATE: January 16, 2002 RE: Northern Rockies PUD Modification#Z-00171, Ellis Street The owners of Northern Rockies Professional Center are requesting a modification to the approved site plan associated with the 7-lot commercial subdivision. Under Section 18.54.040 "Special Conditions of a Planned Unit Development", the deviation or complete exemption from city standards may be allowed if the deviation will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced by the existing standards. As a Planned Unit Development, the applicant requested and was granted a relaxation of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance to allow primary building square footage to exceed the 60% lot coverage permitted under Section 18.26.040 and to allow a relaxation of the yard setbacks for each building as outlined in Section 18.26.050. The applicant is currently requesting a modification of the light standard initially proposed for street and parking lot lighting. As demonstrated in the attached exhibits, including the written request from the applicant, the DMS50-SHB made by Lumec would be replaced with a shoebox style light by Gardco. Staff is requesting input from the Design Review Board as to whether the requested modification would result in a significant compromise of the PUD's design character. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal Mailed To: John Campbell, 3499 Bridger Canyon Road, Bozeman, MT 59715 Gary Lusin, 3200 East Hollyhock, Belgrade, MT 59714 Bayliss Architects, 212 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 ;f f DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING REVIEW SHEET DATE: l�� PROJECT NAME: PREPARED BY: FILE#: -oo 1 7 A APPLICANTS/REPRE ENTATIVES PRESENT: C"' DRB MEMBERS PRESENT: ❑ I4an Glenn VJqaline Mannell Noel ill Hanson ick Pohl ❑ N c oleWAA un Raznoff 62"Dawn Smith WRIenry Sorenson, Jr. Others/Alternates: SUMMARY: w e -e e - 0 F - 0121&J LO",&r1k4 ei Is be 11)" L'u—J Ind : mi ±t) �.0 -4-`S January 7, 2002 PLANNING avITY Jamie Morris Bozeman City Planning Department 20 E. Olive Bozeman, Montana 59715 Re: Northern Rockies Professional Center Light Fixture Substitution Dear Ms. Morris, The developers for the Northern Rockies Professional Center have asked me to change the currently approved light fixture for this PUD project. The new fixture would replace the Domus DMS50 - SG fixture that was submitted which is presently approved by the City. The new fixture has been recently used in the American Bank/Spanish Peak project located on East Main Street. The estimated cost for the fixture will save the developers a substantial amount of money. Please review the attached product information and let me know if additional material or information is needed. Since the new fixture has been approved by the City of Bozeman and meets the cutoff luminar criteria, I believe that we can proceed with the ordering of this product. Thank you for your attention to this issue and your continuing support of this project. Regards, Bayliss Ward, AIA, NCARB r, \ 1 I 4.ao r�y� h � yY4Y r S l� M i� i ' 'I Jl 7 W U Z i Q �El n/i r� U 0 w LL '1 *. A amyl P I' ll An inspiration born of classic forms and thirty years practical x experience, Gullwing is equal parts architecture,engineering and performance.These are luminaires where the lines between form,function and performance are i indistinguishable.Thirteen and eighteen inch luminaires and ;`yI{ Y ii their companion sconces,all featuring an exceptionally sleek •M • i� j contoured form, provide the opportunity to stylishly illuminate pedestrian and access areas,as well as large sites. With Gardco From Ten X optics and lamps to 1000 watts, it µ Gullwing is the new shape of high performance lighting. I l Aesthetically,the Gardco Gullwing draws strength from i simplicity of form that makes them a natural complement i !I to any architectural vocabulary.The subtle elimination of the mounting arm allows Gullwing an uninterrupted ,i transition from luminaire to pole.The striking effect is that y the luminaire and arm become one. But this design serves jpractical purposes as well—minimizing wind load and strengthening the assembly. P i I r.> pt i i y1 i i 'o-": ca; J s^ I i Y \ � f II�I II r r~ The Gullwing 107 sconce adds considerable versatility to the series application as forward,wide and medium throw optics to 175 watts are available. Of course, like all Gardco performance optics, illumination is both glare-free D and sharp cutoff. I FUN- a Gullwing is a model of efficiency—an elegant Separate ballast and lamp compartments serve to reduce the effects of temperature extremes,maximizing component life. response to the inherent obstacles of heat, wind,weather and budgets.The profile is the ' sleekest of any performance luminaire available— r y _ A Y - L just 4 3/4"and 61/2" inches at mid section for Seamless Transitions,Concealed Hardware the G13 and G18 respectively.The arrangement Scale and proportion are correct and satisfying from every viewing angle.Surfaces are sculptural,natural,refined. of components, hardware, hinging mechanisms There are no visible transitions between luminaire door i fame and the supporting arm.There is no visible hardware. and material transitions all speak to the integrity of the design and construction Long Lasting Finishes program. Every aspect of this luminaire exhibits The finish is a fade and abrasion resistant, !� electrostatically applied,thermally cured TGIC a thoughtful, practical and highly refined powder coat.Gullwing housings are thoroughly cleaned and chromate acid treated prior to paint application.Standard colors feature the lightly approach to initial and long term performance. textured Gardco finish.Custom colors may L vary in texture,so please consult factory. Wind Cheating Aerodynamics Gullwing cheats the wind three ways.First,the slippery • silhouette yields an exceptionally low coefficient of drag and correspondingly low EPA values(G18 EPA 1.2[including 1000 watt MH]G13 EPA 0.8).The immediate benefit is the ability to reduce pole gauge and diameter.Because poles are such a significant portion of total project cost,savings can be substantial. Gullwing harnesses the wind across fins that are cast into the top of the luminaire.This design acts as a heat sink to cool the lamp and ballast compartments.The combination of large surface area and the heat sink effectively lowers operating temperatures within the luminaire, further extending ballast and lamp life. A i Tooless Access The integral,extruded,click-lock latch smoothly integrates into the face of the luminaire.The mechanical closing mechanism assures that the gasket seals tightly and continuously. Weather-Protected Construction Gullwing is completely sealed at all points of material transition —• to exclude the intrusion of rain,insects and dust.Because the upper and lower housing are single die castings,the only points of entry are the door frame and lens.When the door frame is closed,the 1/8"gasketing is compressed,forming a continuous,positive seal.The lens is EPDM sealed to the frame.Heavy duty galvanized steel retainers secure the lens. a� c c t SERVI CE l Tooless access for installation and service is a Gardco trademark. Gullwing improves on the tradition with a quick entry door handle providing complete access to optical, electrical and mounting hardware systems.The latch firmly j engages as the door is closed,creating a weather-tight seal by compressing the perimeter gasketing. � z F :r o 4 i I For safety and ease of relamping,a • ' heavy gauge lanyard on the G18 secures the door frame in a semi-open f:: position.A quick release is provided to allow the door to swing down,so that T the optical assembly can be lowered. it J ll ires electrical ,1 11 1 1• disconnect••ture 1 11 plugs. ballast 1®le assembly '1 pre-wired component, hinges on stainless steel mounting brackets. 1 .1 ' without11 1 The G18 is pictured at left,G13 above. E P_____E. . .R_F__O_R_,_M�A_N� In Gullwing,performance takes on a new I The Conical Fan Reflector 16' f l The Form Ten XL reflector facets form a fan x' around the lamp—with each facet positioned + q shape. Inside this streamlined, ultra-thin to be precisely tangent to the top of the arc tube.This patented design captures and redirects lumens to the critical luminaire is an optical system that sets new angles just below cutoff— delivering the footcandle values essential to wider spacings. Y standards for site illumination.The large . lens combines with patented Gardco conical "XU optics to provide an optimal lighting package. High lumen lamps to 1000W MH, V sharp cutoff ' t glare control,wide + � r spacings and excellent maximum-to-minimum a uniformity are the result. t� '' P P, V AM The benefits of higher performance levels \ A- are numerous. In many applications,fewer \ luminaires are necessary to illuminate a I site,compounding fixture, pole, installation Lens J Gullwing optical design and maintenance savings.These more begins with conical fan XL optics.The aperture of the efficient luminaires also enable mounting at lens has been sized so thatlamp lumen output can be \ I directed into measurably lower heights,further reducing initial and wider distributions,enabling \ wider pole spacings at most • mounting heights. long term service costs. ^ o 3 !1 i Highly Reflective Material An essential component of the Form Ten XL is a new anodized aluminum.With reflectivity approaching 95%,the mirror-like finish of the faceted optics substantially improves the efficiency of the reflector. House Side Shield The available house side shield is a natural option to eliminate house side illumination where absolute cutoff is desired.The shield arrives factory installed,captured within the door frame. PIN fs �y rA• e i f V � Rotatable Optical Systems Gardco pioneered the concept of rotatable optics—which enable pole orientation and light distribution to be independent of one another.It also enables reorientation of the optical system,should traffic patterns change. Uniform Distributions Gardco's long-standing commitment to high performance 'I li htin is ultimate) reflected in the distributions created b the Lamps to 1000W 9 9 Y Y ii Gullwing delivers the highest lumen Form Ten XL conical reflector.Three distributions,Types 2,3 package for its size—up to 110,000 and 4,each provide exceptionally wide and uniform illumination lumens from a 1000W MH lamp.Again, free from hot spots and striations.Maximum-to-minimum ratios the result is better performance,wider are excellent,and there is sharp cutoff at the required angle for spacings and lower overall project cost. each distribution.Gullwing G18 also includes Type 1 and 0 (Type V)optics in the original Form Ten reflector design. C: a� r P-E-R-F-O-R--/-\A--A N-C-E 0 D 10 �I / 1 o-0 Ile Ile 1-7 i i —L • �� j' _ ice: �_ _ : - - � , SITE SPECIFICS Closer inspection of a typical lighting plan Optical Systems-4XL ' . (house side shield where required) demonstrates how the Gullwing conical fan XL Lamp-400W HIPS optics deliver uniform illumination free from hot Mounting Height-30" spots and striations—even with wide pole Minimum Maintained Footcandle-1.0 spacing. Maximum pavement illumination is 7.01, y FC Max/Min-5.79:1 \ yielding a maximum to minimum ratio of 5.79: 1. i • � i f Although five optical systems are available,this J site is illuminated using just one. In the center of \ the parking area,4XL optics are mounted back-to- back in twin luminaires creating an efficient square >t ' / ! distribution. Note the addition of the factory- installed house side shield completely eliminates y / _ backside trespass at the perimeter—in this instance where traffic lanes abut office and ✓ ` \ residential areas. • I j A comprehensive Gullwing Applications Guide and the expert services of Gardco's Applications _ Engineering Department stand ready to assist with site lighting analysis and development. Photometric data is available in hard copy and \ 1 disk format. 4 ' I O a 1 / YJ r'. ,� 1•i h• J �hy�,. �h,�'I L :S � ?� .(✓.� {F 1� ..f •,I[ S r�.�. �i Q' ` i7F,t f r'1 �� tr :.,r 1�`�. �,[ _ � �' •. e {1aljw�, xw .f. •r } �.,`� yam+`'t cam. .:: :�.a..a5e•i` ,; _,a g t � • 77, GullwinO precision optics make it -r possible to tailor mounting locations, pole heights and lams to uni P 9 P ue site 9 geometries,continuing the Gardco tradition of providing glare free illumination and absolute sharp cutoff. I 1 � I • Here,Gullwing pole mount luminaires are paired with companion sconces.Sconces with forward throw optics are available with a 5°uptilt option which extends the effective illumination pattern out and away from buildings. f � c a� a� 1 3 ORDERING PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS G13E G13 1 2XL 50 HPS' 120 BRP F j 2 3XL 70 HPS 208 BLP LF 3 4XL 100 HPS 240 WP PC 4 150 HPS 277 NP PCR W 50 MH' 347(low and above) OC POLY Itoow Max) WS 70 MHz 480 SC HS j 100 MHz QS(ioow Max) 150 MH2.1 PTF i 175 MH SPA All lamps are medium base. SPA is required for 1.Available in 120V or 277V only. square poles. 2.Not available with 480V. 3.ANSI#M102 G 1 8 ORDERING PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS G18 2X 250HPS G18 1 1 150 HPS 120 BRP F 2 2XL 250 HPS 208 BLP LF i 3 3XL 400 HPS 240 WP PC a 4 4XL 600 HPS 277 NP PCR W Q' 750 HPSz 347 OC POLY(250W Max) WS 100 MH' 480 SC HS 150 MH' QS (150W Max) 175 MH RPA1 250 MH RPA2 1.Types 1 and 0 are not available above 40OW. 400 MH PTF2 2.Furnished with sag glass lens only. 750 MHz RPA is required for round poles. PTF3 3.Venture mogul base lamps required. 1000 MHz RPA1 is used for 3"o.d.poles or PTF4 NOTE:40OMH requires ED-28 or BT28 tapered round poles where top o.d.is SQPTF reduced jacket lamp.750MH and 1000MH less than 4".RPA2 is used for 4"to 5" l SG. require BT37 reduced jacket lamp. round poles. TPA I I I CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION FINISH OPTIONS ❑— 1 Single Fixture 1 Type I BRP Bronze Paint F Fusing Assembly 2XL Type II BLP Black Paint LF In-Pole Fusing 3XL Type III WP White Paint PC Receptacle and Photocontrol ' 4XL Type IV NP Natural Paint PCR Photocontrol(Receptacle only) �•� 2 Twin(Specify 90°or � 180°Degrees) 0 Type V OC Optional Color Paint POLY Polycarbonate Sag Lens. Specify RAL designation as (250W Max-G18&100W Max-G13) shown in the Color Selection HS HouseSide Shield OTC 3 Triple Assembly Guide. ex:OC-RAL7024 QS Quartz Standby(Max 10OW G13,15OW G18) SC Special Color Paint PTF2 Pole Top Fitter(23i8"Dia.Tenon) 020 4 Quad Assembly (must supply color chip) PTF3 Pole Top Fitter(3-31/2"Dia.Tenon) PTF4 Pole Top Fitter(31i2"-4"Dia.Tenon) • W Wall Mount, Recessed J-Box SQPTF Square Pole Top Fitter = SPA Square Pole Adaptor WS Wall Mount,Surface Conduit RPA 1 Round Pole Adaptor 1 j a (splice compartment within wall canopy) RPA 2 Round Pole Adaptor 2 l �, TPA Square Tapered Pole Adapter • PREFIX DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS 107 �� l 150MH 277 BRP PCB 107 FT Forward Throw 35 HPS' 120 BRP Bronze F Fusing WT Wide Throw 50 HPS' 277 BLP Black (120V,277V) MT Medium Throw 70 HPS 347(HID only) WP White OS Quartz Standby 100 HPS Consult factory NP Natural PCB Button Type 150 HPS for other voltages Aluminum Photocontrol 50 MH' BGP Beige SL Solite® i 0 MH OC Optional Color Diffusing Lens 7 10 MH Specify RAL designation olite is a re AFGred 150 MHz as shown in Color � es Industries Selection Guide.ex. UT 5°Up 175 MH OC-RAL7024 tilt 42 TRF SC Special Color WS Wall Mounted Box C for Surface Conduit Color chip required All lamps are medium base. WG Wire Guard 1.Availability in 120 or 277 only. EM Emergency Option 2.ANSI#M102 (42W only) DIMENSION 4 5r6" I I 11.5" 10.95 cm 29.21 cm /� " ' 3 [ 19.05 cm ' 7.62 cm 21.25" ` 53.98 cm Mounting Bracket Pattern PERFORMANCE VERSATILITY—The 107 Gullwing Sconce is available in a forward illumination pattern out and away from buildings. Medium throw units throw distribution for small parking areas and a wide distribution for offer performance similar to interior downlights,allowing for pedestrian areas medium distribution. Forward throw units are illumination of interior spaces.All are suitable for damp location available with a 5°uptilt option which extends the effective uplighting in lobbies,atriums and beneath canopies. Forward Throw r ?1 Wide Throw '�• Medium Throw I ,� I i CATALOG MAXIMUM NUMBER POLE SIZE LUMINAIRE LOADING ANCHOR BOLT DATA Gullwing's low EPA may allow for downsizing BASE WALL BOLT CONDUIT BOLT = of poles and associated cost reduction. HEIGHT TENON THICKNESS ®100MPH@90MPH®80MPH CIRCLE OPENING SIZE MAX PROD. PRERX (feet) HEIGHT(feet) (inches) EPA(W) (Inches) (inches) (Inches) (inches) STRAIGHT ROUND RA4-08 7'8" 1.25 .100 14.0 17.3 22.5 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 1 ALUMINUM POLES RA4-10 10' 1.25 .125 7.0 9.0 11.7 7.00 2.25 1/2X18X4 3.0 RA4-12 11'8" 1.25 .125 5.0 6.5 8.7 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 RA4-14 14' 2 .125 3.3 4.8 6.7 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 0 - RA4-16 16' 2 .125 3.3 4.8 6.7 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 RA4-18 18' 2 .125 - 1.5 2.3 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 j 1 STRAIGHT ROUND SRS-10.3.0 10' 3X10 .120 6.0 7.7 10.0 8.00 2.75 3/4X17X3 3.75 STEEL POLES N-SRS-12-3.0 12' 3 X 12 .120 4.4 - 5.8 7.7 8.00 2.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 i I SRS-10-4.0 10' 4 X 10 .120 12.2 15.0 19.1 8.00 3.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 SRS-12-4.0 12' 4 X 12 .120 9.5 11.8 15.0 8.00 3.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 SRS-14-4.0 14' 4 X 14 .120 7.6 9.4 12.2 8.00 3.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 SRS-16-4.0 16' 4 X 16 .120 5.9 7.4 9.6 8.00 3.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 1 SRS-18-4.0 18' 4 X 18 .120 4.5 5.7 7.6 8.00 3.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 TAPERED ROUND TRA-10-4.0 10' 4 X 10 .125 5.2 6.7 8.8 7.00' 3.75 3/4 X 15 X 3.25 3.25 1 ALUMINUM POLES TRA-12-4.0 12' 4 X 12 .125 3.6 4.8 6.6 7.00' 3.75 3/4 X 15 X 3.25 3.25 i TRA-14-4.0 14' 4 X 14 .125 2.4 3.4 4.9 7.00' 3.75 3/4 X 15 X 3.25 3.25 TRA-16-4.0 16' 4 X 16 .125 1.5 2.3 3.5 7.00` 3.75 3/4 X 15 X 3.25 3.25 j 0 TRA-18-5.0 18' 4 X 18 .125 2.5 3.5 5.5 8.00` 3.75 3/4 X 15 X 3.25 3.25 --- - -- 'Slotted base allows for 6.5"-8.25"bolt circle. TAPERED ROUND TRS-10-3.0 10' 4.4 X 10 .125 7.0 8.9 11.6 8.00 2.75 314 X 17 X 3 3.75 STEEL POLES TRS-12-3.0 12' 4.4 X 12 .125 7.1 9.0 11.8 8.00 2.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 TRS-14-3.0 14' 4.4 X 14 .125 6.8 8.7 11.4 8.00 2.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 TRS-16-3.0 16' 4.4 X 16 .125 5.9 7.6 10.0 8.00 2.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 0 TRS-18-3.0 18' - 4.4 X 18 .125 5.2 6.7 8.9 8.00 2.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 STRAIGHT SQUARE SSA4-08 8' 1.25 .100 14.0 17.3 22.5 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 ALUMINUM POLES SSA4-10 9'8" 1.25 .100 9.6 12.1 15.8 7.00 2.25 1/2X18X4 3.0 SSA4-12 11'8" 1.25 .100 6.8 8.5 11.5 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 SSA4-14 14' 2 .100 3.4 6.1 8.5 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.5 SSA4-16 16' 2 .100 - 2.0 3.3 7.00 2.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.5 SSA4-18_ 18' 2 .100 - 2.0 3.3 7.00 2.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.5 STRAIGHT SQUARE SSS08-4-11 8' 08 8 .125 20.9 26.3 34.0 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 I i STEEL POLES SSS10-4-11 10' 4 X 10 .125 20.9 26.3 34.0 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 SSS12-4-11 12' 4 X 12 .125 16.3 20.8 27.1 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 SSS14-4-11 14' 4 X 14 .125 12.9 16.7 22.0 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 SSS16-4-11 16' 4 X 16 .125 6.2 8.5 11.8 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 ISSS18-4-11 18' 4 X 18 .125 6.2 8.5 11.8 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 Factory supplied template must be used when setting anchor bolts.Gardco Lighting will not honor any claim for incorrect anchorage placement resulting from failure to use factory supplied templates. T C N 3 - l IIII III G U L LW I r\?G 1 8 P- 0 I F S STF F L PO I F S P F C I F I CATI (D* CATALOG MAXIMUM IJ' NUMBER POLE SIZE LUMINAIRE LOADING ANCHOR BOLT DATA POLE SHAFT BASE COVER The pole shaft is a one section design fabricated from hot rolled welded A base cover completely covers the entire base late and anchorage. ',, • BASE WALL BOLT CONDUIT BOLT P 9 P Y P Gullwings low EPA may allow for downsizing HEIGHT TENON THICKNESS @100MPH @aoMPH @soMPH CIRCLE OPENING SIZE MAX PRa. steel tubing(round)or a single piece of 11 gauge(.1196 )or 7 gauge The base cover is attached with provided hardware. of poles and associated cost reduction. PREFIX (feet) HEIGHT(feet) (Inches) EPA(ft2) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (.1793")commercial carbon steel(square).The formed steel plate is STRAIGHT ROUND RA4-20L 19'11" 2 .135 - 1.5 2.3 7.00 2.25 1/2x 18x4 3.0 Ij longitudinally welded providing minimum yield strength of 36 KSI ANCHOR BOLTS ALUMINUM POLES RA4-20M 19'11" 4 .135 1.1 2.3 3.3 7.00 2.25 5/8X 18X3 3.0 (round)or 46 KSI(square). Anchor bolts are fabricated from a commercial quality hot rolled RA4-20H 19'11" 6 .135 2.0 3.1 4.4 7.00 2.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 carbon steel bar with a minimum guaranteed yield strength of 50 KSI. 1; POLE TOP CAP Bolts have and 1" bend on one end and are threaded on the opposite RA5-25L 24'10" 2.5 .175 2 RA5-20 19'10" 2.s .175 2.0 3.0 3.4 5.2 9.00 3.25.3 8.8 9.00 3.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 Each pole assembly is provided with a removable top cap. end a minimum of 41/2"Anchor bolts are completely hot dipped I RA5-25M 24'10" 4 .175 2.1 4.2 6.1 9.00 3.25 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.0 galvanized a minimum length of 12"on the threaded end. Four(4) RA5-25H 24'10" 7 .175 4.1 5.9 8.5 9.00 3.25 3/4X 18X3 3.0 HANDHOLE properly sized bolts,each furnished with two(2)regular hex nuts, RA5-28L 27'11" 2.5 .175 - 2.3 3.5 9.00 3.25 5/8x 18x3 3.0 A reinforced handhole opening id provided in the pole shaft with two(2)flat washers and one(1)lock washer are provided per pole, RA5-28M 27'11" 4 .175 1.0 2.8 4.3 9.00 3.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 ( a handhole cover plate and attachment screws.A nut holder is unless otherwise specified. RA5-28H 27'11" 7 .175 2.6 4.0 6.0 9.00 3.25 3/4 x 18 x 3 3.0 I attached to the handhole and includes a 1/2"-13 UNC hex head I' RA5-30L 29'10" 2.5 .175 - 1.6 2.7 9.00 3.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 I bolt and nut for grounding. FINISH RA5-30M 29'10" 4 .175 - 2.1 3.3 9.00 3.25 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.0 I Poles are available with a TGIC powdercoat finish. Natural aluminum, 1PA5-30H 29'10" 7 175 1.6 3.3 4.8 9.00 3.25 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.0- - ANCHOR BASE bronze,black or white finishes are available as standard.Special � i The anchor base is fabricated from structural quality hot carbon steel colors are available. STRAIGHT ROUND SRS-20-4.0 20' 4 X 20 .120 3.5 4.4 6.0 8.0 3.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 I plate with minimum yield strength of 36 KSI.The base plate telescopes STEEL POLES SRS-25-4.0 25' a X 25 .120 1.4 1.9 2.8 8.0 3.75 3/4 x 17 x 3 3.75 i the pole shaft and is circumferentially welded on both top and bottom. SRS-20-5.0 20' 5 X 20 .120 7.0 9.1 11.7 8.0 4.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 SRS-25-5.0 25' 5 X 25 .120 4.0 5.5 7.2 8.0 4.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 0 ISRS-30-5.0 30' 5 X 30 .120 2.0 3.0 4.2 8.0 4.75 3/4 X 17 X 3 3.75 _ STRAIGHT SQUARE SSA4-20L 19'9" 2 .100 - 1.5 3.0 7.00 2.25 1/2 X 18 X 4 3.0 ALUMINUM POLE SPECIFICATIONS • ALUMINUM POLES SSA4-20M 19'9" 4 .100 1.4 3.0 4.8 7.00 2.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 SSA4-20H 19'9" 6 .100 1.8 4.7 6.8 7.00 2.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 - - POLE SHAFT BASE COVER IJSSA4.5-20 19'6" 2.5 .150 2.9 4.8 7.3 9.00 3.00 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 ) The pole shaft is one piece,4" (RA4)or 5" (RA5)diameter or A heavy wall spun(round)or fabricated(square)aluminum cover ,1 SSA4.5-24 23'6" 2.5 .150 - 1.8 3.9 9.00 3.00 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 J 4" (SSA4),5"(SSA5)or 6" (SSA6)square,seamless 6000 series completely conceals the entire base plate and anchorage.The base i, SSA4.5-25L 24'6" 2.5 .150 - 1.3 3.2 9.00 3.00 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.0 J extruded aluminum tubing.The shaft is heat treated to achieve a cover is secured to the base assembly with provided hardware. %I SSA4.5-25H 24'6" 7 .150 3.7 5.7 8.4 9.00 3.00 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.0 I T6 temper with a guaranteed minimum yield strength of 31 KSI. ISSA4.5-29H___286" 7 .150 - 3.2 5.3 9.00 3.00 3/4 X 18 X 3- -- - - - - - - - - - - ANCHOR BOLTS if SSA5-20 19'9" 2.5 .130 3.4 4.4 6.9 9.00 3.25 5/8 X 18 X 3 3.5 TOP CAP Anchor bolts are fabricated from a commercial quality hot rolled SSA5-25L 24'9" 2.5 .130 - - 2.7 9.00 3.25 5/8 x 18 x 3 3.5 Each pole assembly is provided with a removable cast aluminum' carbon steel bar with a minimum guaranteed yield strength of 50 KSI. SSA5-25M 24'9" 4 .130 2.1 2.7 5.3 9.00 3.25 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 top cap.The cap is secured with two(2)stainless steel allen head Bolts have and 1" bend on one end and are threaded on the opposite SSA5-25H 24'9" 7 .130 2.2 3.1 5.7 9.00 3.25 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 set screws. end a minimum of 41/2"Anchor bolts are completely hot dipped SSA5-28M 27'9" 4 .130 - - 2.2 9.00 3.25 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 galvanized.Four(4)properly sized bolts,each furnished with two(2) SSA5-28H zrs" 7 .130 - - 3.4 9.00 3.25 3/4 x 18 x 3 3.5 - _J HANDHOLE regular hex nuts,two(2)flat washers and one(1)lock washer are SSA6-30L 29'9" 3 .170 2.2 3.1 6.4 11.00 4.00 3/4 x 18 x 3 4.0 I The handhole has a nominal rectangular inside opening in the pole provided per pole,unless otherwise specified. SSA6 30M 29'9" 6 .170 2.4 3.6 7.0 11.00 4.00 1 X 36 X 4.5 4.0 shaft and tenon assembly. Included is an aluminum cover plate with SSA6-30H 29'9" 9 .170 6.3 7.8 12.4 11.00 4.00 1 X36X4.5 4.0 I attachment screws.The handhole is located 1800with respect to the FINISH SSA6-33L 32'9" 3 .170 - - 1.5 11.00 4.00 3/4 X 18 X 3 4.01 Iuminaire arm when viewed from the top of the pole for one arm. For Poles are available with a TGIC powdercoat finish. Natural aluminum, SSA6-33M 32'9° 6 .170 - - 4.1 11.00 4.00 1 x36X4.5 4.0 j two arms,the handhole is located directly under one arm. bronze, black or white finishes are available as standard.Special SSA6-33H 32'9" 9 .170 3.5 3.9 7.0 11.00 4.00 1 X 36 X 4.5 4.0 1 colors are available. BASE TENON ASSEMBLY STRAIGHT SQUARE SSS20-4-11 20' 4 11 4.6 6.6 9.6 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 1 The tenon anchor base assembly consists of structural quality A53 STEEL POLES SSS20-4-7 20' 4 7 8.8 11.8 16.0 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 carbon steel tubing welded to an A36 structural steel base with a SSS24-4-11 24' 4 11 2.0 3.6 6.0 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 J + guaranteed minimum yield strength of 36 KSI.The base tenon SSS24-4-7 24' a 7 5.4 7.8 11.4 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 ' telescopes the pole shaft and is circumferentially welded on both top SSS25-4-11 25' 4 11 1.4 3.0 5.3 8.00 3.64 3/4 X 18 X 3 3.5 and bottom.The entire assembly is hot dipped galvanized after ISSS25-4-7 25' 4 7 4.7 7.0 10.4 8.00 3.64 3/4X 18X3 3.5 I fabrication. Four(4)mechanically galvanized fasteners secure the 'I • shaft to the tenon assembly. SSS25-5-11 25' 5 11 3.7 ' 6.3 9.8 10.00-12.00 4.64 1 X 36 X 4.5 4.0 i SSS25-5-7 25' 5 7 9.1 12.7 17.8 10.00-12.00 4.64 1 X 36 X 4.5 4.0 I SSS30-5-11 30' 5 11 - 2.0 4.7 10.00-12.00 4.64 1 X 36 X 4.5 4.0 I o SSS30-5-7 30' 5 7 3.9 6.7 10.7 10.00-12.00 4.64 1 X 36 X 4.s 4.0 I 3 c Factory supplied template must be used when setting anchor bolts.Gardco Lighting will not honor any claim 3 for incorrect anchorage placement resulting from failure to use factory supplied templates. ) S P E T 10 N S HOUSING: A one-piece die cast aluminum housing mounts Sconce optics provide for forward throw,wide and medium i directly to a pole or wall without the need for a support arm.The distributions. For the G18 a mogul base lampholder is glazed low profile rounded form generates wind loading requirements of porcelain with a nickel plated screw shell. Position-oriented 1.2 EPA-G18 and 0.8-G13. sockets are supplied standard to accept super metal halide lamps. ' All G18 units feature lamp stabilizers except 150 HPS. Lampholder (! LENS ASSEMBLY: A single-piece die cast aluminum lens frame for the G13 and 107 Gullwing Sconce is medium base. hinges down from the housing and is secured by a stainless steel lanyard(G18 only)and hinge pin. ELECTRICAL: All electrical components are UL recognized, An optically clear,heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass factory tested,and mounted on a unitized plate with quick r lens is mechanically secured with eight retainers(six on G13) electrical disconnects. Each high power factor ballast is the separate component_type capable of providing reliable lamp f �, (G181000W MH utilizes a slightly convex lens).The electrical and starting down to-20°F. optical chambers are thoroughly sealed with a one-piece memory retentive hollow core EPDM gasket to prevent intrusion by rain, FINISH: Luminaires are finished with a fade and abrasion f( dust and insects. resistant,electrostatically applied,thermally cured textured TGIC � powder coat. Units are thoroughly cleaned and provided with a OPTICAL SYSTEMS: The segmented optical systems are patented chromate acid pretreatment. Optical and special colors b manufactured from homogenous sheet aluminum which has been may vary. Contact factory. i electrochemically brightened,anodized and sealed.The multifaceted arc image duplicating systems are designed to LABELS: All fixtures bear UL and CSA(or CUL)Wet Location produce IES Types 1 (1), II (2XL), III (3XL), IV(4XL),and V(0). and I.B.E.W. labels. With the 2XL,3XL and 4XL luminaires,the reflector facets form a t As part of continuing quality improvement programs,Gardco Lighting reserves the conical fan around the arc tube with each facet positioned to be k J right to change materials or modify the design of its product without notification. # precisely tangent to the top of the arc tube. DIMENSIONS G13=22.5' G18=31.5° G13=13.5° (includes integral arm) dt -.,G18=18.0° Fascia Plates Form 10 Round 100 Line Sconces Bollards +� -- G18=6.5' G13 8.5° / E.P.A. (SO.FT.) ), G13 G18 " 1-way— .8 1-way—1.2 2-way—1.6 2-way—2.4 / j 0 r 3-way—2.2 3-way—3.2 4-way—2.2 4-way—3.2 00 ' ` ` - of • ' • LIGHTING CON FIGH R A T I O N S 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro,CA 94577 a ' 800/227-0758 For wall-mounted applications,the 510/357-6900 in California the design allows mounting to both Fax:510/357-3088 a j-box and surface conduit.For www.sitelighting.com surface conduit,the splice is made inside the wall canopy.Splice box ' • u volume is 50.5(1318)and 26(G13) cubic Inches. OGardco Copyright 2001 y , Genlyte Thomas Group LLC Gullwing is UL approved for a .all Rights Reserved. International Copyright Secured. through wiring. - 1 2 4 79103-1711200 R7L c � O:nt By: GARDCO LIGHTING APPS 1 510 357 4852; Jan-8-02 8:20AM; Page 6/7 PHOTOMETRIC FILENAME : GW3X25M.IES POLAR GRAPH 533.4 180° House Side 400.05 266.7 133.35 i :90, 90° Street Side 0° Plane through Cone through 55° Horizontal 67.5°Vertical CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING - 20 EAST OLIVE STREET P.O. BOX 1230, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 (406) 582-2360 FAX (406) 582-2363 Frr 1e��3 BY APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION OF A PLAN APPROVED AFTER THE FEBRUARY 12, 1990 ADOPTION OF THE JAN 2 2 2002 BOZEMAN ZONING ORDINANCE CITY p;AIvNING ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Per Section 18.52.070.13, Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, amendment or modification of a plan approved after the February 12, 1990 adoption of the Zoning Ordinance shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review, and may be approved by the Director upon finding that the amended plan is in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan ,the application must be resubmitted as a new application, and shall be subject to all plan review and approval provisions of the Ordinance. A revised plan, drawn to scale, must be submitted which clearly shows the amendment/modification. 1. Name and mailing address of property owner: , }f-1 G�1�111?I�jiU1• Ll,j�. s UST L{,jGJt� (oL•� poeAGp_+4't py• Phone: (o . d�20 P70 I Ala( -5�11 lGj 2. Name and mailing address of applicant: mks f L16sp AW 1.r 6J , e. yl o GJ-�� p lr-, Phone: vpXHPO I t'1 kl IC7� 3. Address of property to be altered: V I l��i�T S �u.� PO 4. Name of Business (if applicable): eEp��. 5. Explanation of amendment/modification: gWa0H1k l lk�lti-1�, �otZ d IV. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Applic ature As owner of record of the above-described property, I hereby certify that I do not oppose the submittal of this application, and would not object to the proposed amendment/modification of said property as described herein. Pro ert Owner's S•gnature APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION OF PLAN APPROVED AFTER 2/12/90 Page 1 REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR Based on the information submitted with this application , and a review of other pertinent PP information, I hereby find that the amended plan IS IS NOT (Circle One) in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan. If the amended plan is not in substantial compliance with the originally approved plan, the proposal shall be subject to all plan review and approval provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Director COMMENTS/CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION OF PLAN APPROVED AFTER 2/12/90 Page 2 - 12 - The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, and Mayor Youngman. Those voting No, none. Public hearing - Conditional Use Permit for Northern Rockies Planned Unit Development - C&H Engineering and Surveying for Campbell/Lusin, LLC - allow a seven-lot office/medical office complex on approximately 7.7 acres described as Tract C, COS No. 1177C with relaxation of code requirements to allow primary building to exceed 60 percent lot coverage reduce.yard setbacks for each building, and allow roofs to exceed height limitations (southeast corner of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street) (Z-00171) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit requested by C&H Engineering and Surveying for Campbell/Lusin, L.L.C., under Application No. Z-00171 , to allow a seven-lot office/medical office complex. on approximately 7.7 acres described as Tract C, Certificate of Survey No. 1 177C, with relaxation of code requirements to allow primary building to exceed 60 percent lot coverage, reduced yard setbacks for each building, and allow roofs to exceed height limitations. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Highland Boulevard and Ellis Street. Mayor Youngman opened the public hearing. Assistant Planner Morris presented the staff report, calling attention to her March 191' memo, adding conditions 9 through 11, which are standard boilerplate conditions. Bayliss Ward, Bayliss Architects, asked if the infrastructure is not currently in place, can the applicant get a building permit before the infrastructure is accepted by the City of Bozeman? Planning Director Epple responded they would need to request a variance from the subdivision regulations. Mr. Ward then stated the buildings will all be main structures, and they would like to have some design flexibility but are limited by the roof pitch requirements. Ms. Morris replied that has been addressed by revising condition 5. Commissioner Frost questioned the screening of the parking and the proposed light fixtures. Mr. Ward assured him they will be_addressed and will be acceptable. Dr. John Campbell, co-owner, stated 'all scenarios are for maximum square footage; there could be smaller buildings built. They just want to work collaboratively with the City first, then they will work from that point forward on this project. Since there were on Commissioner objections,.Mayor Youngman closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Smiley, that the Conditional Use Permit requested by C&H Engineering and Surveying for Campbell/Lusin, L.L.C., under Application No. Z-00171, to allow a seven-lot office/medical office complex on approximately 7.7 acres described as Tract C, Certificate of Survey No. 1 1.77C, with relaxation of code requirements to allow primary building to exceed 60 percent lot coverage, reduced yard setbacks for each building, and allow roofs to exceed height limitations, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1 . The subdivision shall provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 2. Only.one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the architectural guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval 'prior to PUD final plan approval. 03-19-2001 - 13 - 4. The architectural guidelines and the final site plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the.Planning Department. 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Department) and Planning Department prior to final site plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed final site plan showing the location for the'enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any- phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the final site plan. 8. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1 :4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner.prior to the commencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than 12 months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within 9 months of Planning Department approval. 11 . Seven (7) .copies of the final site plan containing all of the conditions, corrections, and modifications approved by the City Commission. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within 6 months of the date of approval. 12. Per Section 18.65.070.E "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)." the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of 5 feet from the right-of- way line. Wall signs in the R-O district .are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060:B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." ti 03-19-2001 - 14 - The motion carried by the following Aye.and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brown, and Mayor Youngman. Those voting No, none. Adjournment - 8:23 am There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Smiley, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Kirchhoff, and Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none. 03-19-2001 . � qGm# jagq , R�EmI # EGG BALLAII . EbuNly ELERK ANaV.. u EP . BBZEhAN , MI rr. B2Sy mmQm' w : CA i G. m w Sod # .2 2 D0C 9m2 MIS G ±f o0 Cd9I - D.00 . G LE NO m68 ro'G 4 2 &;RP . _ D1 Rlk) ,1:'L S _ . DOCUMENT a ».« FILE NO.. 2 0,4qG P 'a 4 . Z,2,&? . mG: a3G M., , DOMEA e a.m .I« RR(yT m.q A'aIJkG"' CEDED ----> .k G4G§ CgmE ��-�w E m © ICheck 9w EGG # cGASZ #%m *# RRmT #% CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NORTHERN ROCKIES SUBDIVISION,A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON ELLIS STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified.architectural and landscape plan for a 7-lot medical office and professional office complex; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as Tract C, COS 1177C, SE3, SW3, Section 8, T2S, R6E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following thirteen(13) conditions and code provisions: 1. The subdivision shall provide "people spa •es" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 2. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan. approval. 4. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 1 OF 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 8. The amount of stonnwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by I lie Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute rest,-ictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and_shall,be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recordcr's Office by the property owner prior to the conunencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an hnprovements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the, amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) i �. months of Planning Department approval. 11. Seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six months of the date of approval. Code Provisions: 12. Per Section 18.65.070.B 'Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additiotal Screening Requirements." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN, that the above-noted thirteen(13) conditions and code provisions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding.upon me, the undersigned owner.of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a restaurant. DATED THIS _ 2_ O DAY OF AA 5�ccs f, 2001. LANDOWNE By• ohn Campbell Campbell, LLC STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss' County of Gallatin 'o ) On this ` day of l� ,2001,before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Jolaii bell, known to me to be the j�.SI of Campbell,LLC,the corporation that execs d the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged tome that he executed the same for and on behalf o; -iid corporation. Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) Not Publi for the St, to of Residi Commission E pires: t �d LAND WNER By: Gary Lusin Gary F. Lusin, L"LC STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of uC ,2001,before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Aary Lusin, known tome to be the j O'n' tcVOSE of Gau F.Lusin,LLC, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal as of the day and year first above written. (Seal) pp Nota. Pubor the St of Residing: Q Commission Exp es:,� apl1 �I Northern Rockies Zoning PUD #Z-00171 PAGE 4 08/16/2001 THU 23:07 FAX Z002/002 A Waste Services August 17,2001 AUG 2 1 2001 r-iTY pLA�,'%NING Bayliss Architccts Mr.Bayliss Ward 212 South Tracy Bozeman,MT 59715 RE: Garbage Enclosures at the proposed Northern Rockies Professional Center, Ellis Street,Bozeman,MT Dear Mr. Ward: We have reviewed your site plan in relation to the trash enclosures. We foresee no difficulty in accessing or servicing the waste containers at this location. We look forward to providing waste collection service within this new subdivision, Sincerely, Harry Kirschenbaum Markcting Director PO Box 10730 • Bozeman, Montana 59719 • Phone 406-586-0606 • Fax 406-587-6909 NORTHERN ROCKIES SUBDIVISION FINAL SITE PLAN 8/20/01 The following items must be addressed prior to final site plan approval: • Page 26 replace light detail with DMS50-LD and remove all details from light exhibits that refer to any other type of light • Letter from garbage collection service • Quantities of shrubs 4- Landscape plan signed by a certified landscape professional • Square footage of softscape for subdivision • Architectural Guidelines Page 29 should state that each building must provide at least one bike rack. • Site plan and Architectural Guidelines Page 29 must reflect dimensions of internal grass boulevards as a minimum width of 5%2 feet and interior sidewalks at a minimum of 3 feet in width • The Conditional Use Permit and the Waivers must be resigned, notarized and filed with the Clerk&Recorder. A copy of the signed documents and the recording receipt must be provided to our office. • Seven copies of the Final Site Plan and three copies of the Architectural Guidelines must be submitted with all corrections. MEMORANDUM TO: GARY LUSIN (fax # 587-3919) FROM: JAMI MORRIS, ASSISTANT PLANNER RE: REMAINING CONDITIONS & COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED FOR NORTHERN ROCKIES DATE: AUGUST 17, 2001 Northern Rockies Subdivision Final Plat: • #11 State Historic Preservation Office inventory • #12 Memorandum of Understanding • #30 Letters from: Fish, Wildlife &Parks; Soil Conservation Service, Army Corps of Engineer's • Signatory blocks need to be the same as the platting certificate • Consent of Mortgagees needs to be added to certificates 0V1- • Letter of Credit and Platting Certificate need to be provided P, -ft4C Northern Rockies Final Site Plan: • #4 Light detail depicted not allowed. An approved light must be depicted on the site plan and in the Architectural Guidelines • #6 A letter from the City Sanitation Foreman or a private service stating approval of location of the trash enclosures • #8 Storm water detention must be noted on the final site plan. Current plans show landscaping in the storm water detention ponds and snow removal areas. Architect and Engineer need to coordinate plans. • #9 Conditional Use Permit needs to be signed, notarized and recorded • #13 Additional landscaping in the rear yard necessary. • Trash enclosure detail on plans and materials should be noted if all of the trash enclosures will be the same. • Disable Accessible sign detail • Ramps should be shown where sidewalk intersects with asphalt and for access from disabled accessible parking spaces. • Architectural Guidelines need to address the conditions of approval and be consistent throughout. Corrections needed in regards to building heights (see condition of approval), building on multiple lots, roofs, roof pitch, screening rooftop mechanical equipment, light detail, trash enclosure materials, city standards sidewalk and boulevard width, maintenance schedule as required by condition of approval (open space, landscaping, interior street lighting, snow removal and storm water detention). • Stop signs shown at intersections of drive accesses with EllisStreet. • Site plan needs to be fully dimensioned. • A reduced copy of the site plan, paving plan and landscape plan needs to be in the Architectural Guidelines. I 0 NORTHERN ROCKIES PUD i Review Time Frame STEP 1 Infrastructure (i.e., water, sewer, sidewalks, Depends on Applicant streets) required by the Subdivision PUD must be installed or improvements must be secured with a signed Improvements Agreement and a Letter of Credit or a Certificate of Deposit. STEP 2 Final Plat for the Subdivision PUD and the Final Plat 45 days Final Plan (including 3 copies of the Final Plan 2-3 weeks Architectural Guidelines) for the Zoning PUD must be filed concurrently. STEP 3 Upon Final Plan approval an Informal 3-4 weeks application for a Minor Site Plan or a Major Site Plan may be submitted. STEP 4 Formal application may be filed for a Minor Minor Site Plan 4-6 weeks Site Plan or Major Site Plan for individual lot (<15,000 gross sq.ft. or <40 review upon Final Plat approval for the parking spaces) subdivision. Major Site Plan 10-12 weeks STEP 5 Submit a Final Site Plan that addresses all 2-3 weeks conditions of approval for a Minor or Major Site Plan application. STEP 6 Infrastructure must be completed for the Depends on Applicant subdivision. STEP 7 Submit a Building Permit application once the 2-4 weeks (depends on infrastructure and street improvements have Building Department review been installed, certified, inspected and schedule) accepted by the City of Bozeman and the Final Site Plan for the Minor or Major has been approved. 06 I March 26, 2001 Campbell/Lusin, LLC 3499 Bridger Canyon Road Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: #P-0047 Northern Rockies Major Subdivision PUD Preliminary Plat #Z-00171 Northern Rockies Zoning PUD Dear Mr. Campbell: At its March 19, 2001, meeting the Bozeman City Commission voted 5-0 to conditionally approve your Major Subdivision PUD Preliminary Plat and the Zoning PUD application to establish a unified architectural and landscape plan for the subdivision and development of 7.7 acres into a Mot medical office and professional office complex, on your property located on Ellis Street. The proposal was evaluated against the review criteria and requirements of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The Commission's decision was based on the fact that, with conditions, the proposal complies with the requirements of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and the Bozeman Area Master Plan and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. The decision of the City Commission is final. Seven copies of a Final Site Plan for the Zoning PUD which shows how all conditions of approval and code provisions have been addressed must be submitted to the Planning & Community Development Department, within 6 months of preliminary approval, by September 19, 2001. The submittal must be accompanied by a written narrative explaining how all of the conditions of approval have been addressed. The enclosed Zoning Improvements Agreement must be signed by the property owners prior to Final Site Plan approval. In addition, the Conditional Use Permit must be signed and filed with the Clerk & Recorder's Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. Please return a signed copy along with a copy of the recording receipt to the Planning Department. The conditions for approval are as follows: 1. The subdivision shall provide "people spaces" within the designated common open space with features such as a clock tower and/or picnic pavilion. These features shall be identified on the final plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning 'Department. 2. Only one low-profile sign per ingress/egress shall be permitted for the complex. 3. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines with a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers. The modified guidelines shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to PUD final plan approval. 4. The Architectural Guidelines and the Final Site Plan shall contain a typical light detail and specifications outlining the style of light, the height, the type and wattage of the bulb and a polar distribution chart for the parking, pedestrian circulation area and wall mounted light fixtures. 5. The roof pitch of any building within the PUD shall maintain a roof pitch no less than 6:12 for principal buildings and 4:12 for accessory buildings or other alternatives that are appropriate to the area, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department. 6. No trash enclosures are permitted in front of parking stalls. Furthermore, the location and size shall be approved by the City's Sanitation Foreman (Dept.) and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. If a private garbage service will be utilized instead of City garbage service, a copy of the proposed Final Site Plan showing the location for the enclosure shall be submitted to the private company for their review and approval. 7. Any phasing, proposed by the developer, shall be depicted on the Final Site Plan. 8. The amount of stormwater detention/retention ponds within the required front yard setback shall be limited to not-more than one-third of the lineal frontage of the subdivision and shall not exceed a depth of 1-1/2 feet and a slope of 1:4. 9. The right to a Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. All of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the commencement of use. 10. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements. The Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not installed at the time of occupancy. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of Planning Department approval. 11. Seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six months of the date of approval. 12. Per Section 18.65.070.13 "Business and Office Zones (B-1, R-O)," the maximum allowable total signage for a lot shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in the -2- R-O district and shall have a minimum setback of five feet from the right-of-way line. Wall signs in the R-O district are not to exceed a total signage allowance of half of a square foot per linear foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding and/or projecting signs. 13. Additional landscaping shall be provided within the rear setback of the complex in order to provide screening for the future residential development to the south, per Section 18.49.060.B.3 "Additional Screening Requirements." Two mylar copies, two digital copies and five paper prints of the Final Plat application for the Subdivision PUD showing how all the conditions of approval have been addressed along with the signed Waivers of Right to Protest the Creation of SID's must be provided to the Planning Department within three (3) years of preliminary plat approval. The submittal must be accompanied by a written narrative explaining how all of the conditions of approval have been addressed. Upon completion of the Final Plat application, then each individual lot owner will be required to submit a Sketch Plan Review Application and each building site will be subject to review and approval by the Development Review Committee (DRC). The conditions for approval are as follows: 1. Corrections and/or explanations shall be provided for the following sections of text within the Architectural Guidelines: a) the architectural guidelines refer to lot coverage not exceeding 60% and the site plan clearly depicts the building envelope of each site exceeding 60%, page 17; b) the architectural guidelines shall note that all signs are subject to the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, page 17; c) total signage permitted per building and the maximum size of each sign shall be in compliance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, page 18; and d) the only uses identified under the PUD have been general offices, medical offices and daycare facilities, any other uses shall be identified prior to final plat (page 25 addresses overnight parking for residential uses). 2. Street lights shall be provided along Ellis Street and shall comply with the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 4. The applicant shall be required to provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SIDS) for the following: a. Signalization improvements to the intersection of Ellis Street and Highland Boulevard. b. Highland Boulevard improvements. -3- C. A city-wide Parks Maintenance District. The document filed shall specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the Developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development or a combination thereof. 5. The following specific items should be taken into account in development of a stormwater master plan: a. A significant grade differential should be avoided between the proposed structures, stormwater retention/detention ponds, and sidewalk adjacent to Ellis Street. b. If retention facilities are not a viable option, detention facilities should be considered as an alternative. C. Ellis Street gutter capacities and ultimate stormwater drainage destinations should be included in development of the master plan. d. Stormwater drainage facility locations should be coordinated with landscape planning so that trees and shrubs which do not proliferate in standing water are located outside of designated retention ponds. 6. To avoid future street cuts, a 12-in diameter (min) RCP stub shall be provided across Ellis Street (approx. station 3+00) from the proposed catch basin inlet for connection to a future catch basin inlet. 7. Based on the City of Bozeman Water Facilities Master Plan, proposed water line extensions along Ellis Street shall be a minimum diameter of 10-in. Proposed water line extensions within the development shall be a minimum diameter of 8-in. 8. The developer will be required to dedicate to the City of Bozeman one-half of a 60-foot right-of-way (30-feet) for Ellis Street. At a minimum, Ellis Street shall be designed to a full local street standard and constructed to a 32-feet width with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the south side extending from the intersection with Highland Boulevard to the east property line of the proposed development. The developer's engineer shall submit plans and specifications to the City Engineering Office outlining the improvements necessary on Highland Boulevard to accommodate southbound left-hand turning movements from Highland Boulevard onto Ellis Street. The design shall account for existing improvements and right-of-way, and meet the minimum American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) geometric design requirements. The Plans and Specifications will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Office, and they must be approved prior to construction -4- of the improvements. The required improvements shall be completed or financially guaranteed prior to final plat approval. No building permits will be issued prior to City of Bozeman acceptance of said infrastructure improvements. 10. Stop signs shall be provided at the intersections of the private drives with Ellis Street. 11. As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. 12. The final plat and the bylaws shall contain a note stating that the streets within the subdivision are private and the lot owners are responsible for all maintenance, upkeep and repair. 13. Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. 14. The covenants shall be recorded with the final plat which specifically includes the provisions from Section 16.34.030, as well as provisions for property owner's association maintenance, upkeep and repair of all applicable open space, landscaping within the required yard setbacks, interior street lighting, parks areas, park area landscaping, pedestrian facilities, snow removal and storm water facilities. 15. The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The final plat application shall include two (2) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film(or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 31h-inch floppy disk; and five (5) paper prints. 16. The developer shall have three (3) years from the date of Preliminary Plat approval to complete the conditions of preliminary plat approval and apply for Final Plat approval. At the end of this period the governing body may, at the written request of the subdivider, extend its approval for no more than one (1) calendar year, as outlined in Section 16.10.050.J of the Subdivision Regulations. 17. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements , an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. -5- 18. The plans and specifications for the project infrastructure must be adequately dimensioned and clearly indicate the extent of all improvements proposed for each phase. The plans must clearly show the location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer/water mains and easements, as well as nearby and proposed fire hydrants. All infrastructure improvements required for the development including water and sewer main extensions, public streets, curb and gutter, sidewalks and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be constructed or financially guaranteed prior to final plat approval. No building permits within any phase of development will be issued prior to completion and City of Bozeman acceptance of said infrastructure improvements for that phase. 19. All submittals must be adequately dimensioned. A legend of all pertinent line types and symbols used shall also be provided. 20. Stormwater Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention/detention basin location(s), and show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel(s). The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site(s), drainage ways, and finished lot grades), typical stormwater retention/detention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the park or open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff from subdivision improvements (i.e., public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements upon privately owned lots, unless approved by the Governing Body under the project review and approval process. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention/detention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the Final Site Plan for each lot. 21. Stormwater retention and detention improvements shall be included on the landscaping plan. 22. Easements for the water, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from edge of easement. -6- 23. The Developer's engineer shall be required to prepare a comprehensive Design Report addressing existing capacity of sewer and water utilities and the demands of the proposed development. The report must include hydraulic evaluations of each utility for both existing and post-development demands. The report findings must demonstrate adequate capacity to serve the full development. If adequate water and/or sewer capacity is not available for development, the report must identify necessary water system and/or sewer system improvements required for full development. Capacity limitations exist in sewer mains downstream from the proposed development. The Design Report must specifically address the hydraulic capacity of the existing downstream City sewer mains with respect to the anticipated loading from the proposed development. 24. Plans and specifications for the sewer and water main extensions, prepared by a Professional Engineer (PE) licensed in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Sewer and water main plans shall also be approved by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). The Applicant shall also provide professional engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans, specifications, and shop drawings have been approved by the City and a pre-construction conference has been conducted: 25. Sewer and water services shall be approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the Applicant. Where services cross under retention ponds and/or culverts, adequate cover shall be maintained. 26. Plans and Specifications for any required fire service lines must be prepared in accordance with the City's Fire Service Line Policy by a PE, and be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. 27. Prior to issuance of building permits for each lot, Pretreatment Program Sanitary Sewer Surveys shall be submitted to the Engineering Department and, if required under the City's Pretreatment Program, the developer shall install individual sewer service sampling manholes. 28. Plans and specifications for the Ellis Street improvements, prepared by a PE licensed in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. 29. The drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard non- residential driveway approach (City of Bozeman Standard Drawing No. 02529-11). -7- 30. The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Soil Conservation Service, MDEQ, and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained by the Applicant and copies provided to the City Engineering Department prior to approval of the related plans and specifications or construction of the intended work. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval, the Final Site Plan approval process or the Final Plat process. The Findings of Fact and Order for the Preliminary Plat have been drafted and sent over to the City Attorney's Office. Once the Findings have been approved and signed, I will forward the original and a copy to you for your files. If you have any further concerns or questions, please feel free to contact me, 582-2360. Sincerely, Jami Morris Assistant Planner JM/jm cc: -8- 3 O O z o p H Q 5 11 U1 a. PLANT LIST 1 j E TREES Name Common Name QTY. PLANTING 517E MATURE HT.MATURE SFM Q Acer saacharum'Green Mountain' Green Mountaln Maple 56 2 Ga. 5 35 Acer tatarlGUm Tatarlan Ma le 39 6'O'ht. 25' 20' Grataegus crux-galls Inermis'Gruzam' Crusader Hawthorn 5 6 O hL 15 to, Picea un ens Colorado Green Spruce 21 1 O'ht. 50, 25, PopUlu9 tremuloides Clunking Aspen 22 1 Gal. b 30 R,binla oeudoacacla'Pur le Robd Pur le Robe Locust 25 2'Cal. 40' 30, • Ila cordate GreenspIr Greensp re n en 2 4a 50 SHRUBS 00) Acer ginnala'Compaotd COMPaet AmUr Map a 260. _ Euon mus alatus Burnie Bush 26 a' W Junlperous Sabina eu falo' Bu a o Jumper 2 a. Ph 9oG8r u9 o ullfolius'Darts Gold' Darts GOId Ninebark 2 Gal. b' Rose rugosa'Therese Bugnet' There-1Korean9ne ere-Bgne Rose tea. ram} 5 rin a me eri'Pal[Wrf Dwarf Korean Lilac 2 Gal. 4' W NOTE:TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHOWN WITHIN BUILDING LOTS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST. NOTE:ALL LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. Y 1 SHRUB PLANTING SHRUB PLANTIN05 ANNUAL ER w AGER G.'GOMPAGTA' EUONYMUS AL FLOW ATUS SNOW REMOVAL -SOD LAWN PHYSOGARPUS O.'DARTS 60L JUNIPERU5 5.'BUFFAL PLANTIN STORAGE AREA T . SHRUB PLANTING5 ROSA R.'TNERESE BUGNET FBI SYRINGA M.PAL EUONYMU5 ALATUS BIN' O JUNIPERU5 5.'5UFFAL GARBAGE ENCLOSU LOW MOM GARBAGE BOULDE ENTRY 5IGN ENCLOSU ELLIS STREET BOULDE ..,. ... ..... :.-.... BERM SHRUB PLANTING AGER G.'GOMPAGTA' 50D PHY50GARPUS O.'DARTS GOL ANNUAL LAWN, FLOWER LIMIT O SOD LAW PLANTING LOT T 5OD O ENTRY SIGN _ c c PROPERTY BERM A (1'0"GONTOU ) .�� � � •.� �':; '� �: LINE TYP. JJ, SHRUB PLANTINGS ri REM 5TORAGE AREA EUONYMUS ALATUS GARBAGE FBI \ JUNIPERU5 S.'BUFFAL _. .SOD c e r 1 �l ENGL05U NOW REMOVAL O PR I 5TORA65E AREA Z BOULDE LOW FROM IGNIG IC T4 ��/•�ENTRY SIGN : x° O .SOD ABLE5 Mr j V 1 I TS IOT 5 LA N .ti •' :. DRY PONDOULLW EDd BENCH 1— �SNON AWN a LAWN - MOVAL LOW WOOD STORAGE AREA RIDGE ✓ O 6 N W REMOV r' WA E Vjj ` STORAGE AREA V NOW REMOVAL O COPYRIGHT2000 \ STORAGE AREA I I fini I 111 CTA fs, L4I�o°u�s ' -' O D 5 [,� nnLa�cs.nRasotaA .. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED u c Y PICNIC e - > DRAWN BY: Ao YPIG ARBAGE SNOW Y ENCLOSURE GR055 . ' TABLES(2 '' CHECKED BY: sR _ STOR IS A OW PR OT DATE: JAR 1 9,2001 �' DRY 5TR£AM � BUILDING IOT 2 Y OLDER 10 T GTA■ NRML5 51GNA6 I 1 1 e - GADD FILE:NRLSL 101 DIR: T 1 - Eli NOW REMOVAL - e bavliss 5TORA6EAREA :..: ..;: .;. : .. AIBA FL BAYLIS RGHIT TS,P.G. ■ NOri REMOVAL LIMIT OF HAYUssARGHmEGTBGON STORAGE AREA LOT TYR NOW REMOVAL OD LAWN URB d NOW REMOVAL SNOW REMOV OD LAWN -CONCRETE EATURE PAVEMENT NOW REMOVAL BozEMAK.ONTAHA PROPERTY TINE STORAGE AREA GUTTER TYP. STORAGE AREA - STORAGE AREA SIDEWALK TYP. AT BUILDING STORAGE AREA ENTRIE5 TYP. ARBAGE GAR5AGE ENCLOSURE ENCLOSURE SUNIPE US S.'BUFFALO HRUB PLANTIN6 AM d POND AREA) PRELIMINARY ROSA R.'THERE5E BUGNET LANDSCAPE 5YRINGA M.PALBIN PLAN I LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALE:1'-40' Tract C,Certificate of Survey No.1177C located in SE 114,SW 114,Section 8,T.2 S.,R.6 E.of P.M.M., Gallatin County,Montana - 5 �a SHEET L101 1 1 OF 1 0 © 0 ® 0