Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300222985369896) Z-9939 (2 OF 2) o it A b a x a a H (n H (n H W � H ',7 a (n m O m W U x ro w >+ v (x O U UNU a c9 O wwzw H O 1-( X (� rtC N O cw0rn rn a i �Hwa rn p, m � N i H N N (n(n u 4 L'� PRLLWINARY PLAT FOR : BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OWNERS: GARDNER GREEN, JR. PURPOSE: CREATE 8 BUSINESS LOTS AND TO CREATE MONTANA RANCH PROPERTIES, INC. A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. BAXTER CREEK CORRIDOR/OPEN SPACE TRIPLE THREE, LLC ___ 1805 WEST DICKERSON #1 CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONV I HINIA BOZEMAN, MT 59715 j - i 9 "H-138 51509 E 622. 6 r •\ Y 1.—_. �fi id •..•11249 R/-Vl -. i 1 I 'err 25 P.O.B. SOUTH 1/66 CORNER OF THE n0.oa' SOUTH 1/4 OF - �"'`. ,._,\ I FOUND�4"T MDT ALUMINUM IOCAP N 9 } m , v' -_'LdT 7 BAXifR ppFFREE 45,699 s-ft.._II co o 1.05 0c -;I LOT 6 - OPEN SPACE 353,338R + .26 4 4 ft. I� 1 22 ac.tt „1 p .5 T :OT—Tv-66'SS'�"Y -` ,. (yP46 ¢ LEGEND og •II tt' -0-->-�`! \� RIM EL=aaOBIA s.o7 �-�'' I i• • SET 1 1/4" YPC MK'D MORRISON MAIERLE, INC ' r •,�, - O FOUND YPC MK'D GASTON ENG. s 89ro040^E 158.45' I A FOUND 5/8" REBAR a � , I •'�--'' ,._._- � � a FOUND 2" MDT ALUMINUM CAP MK'D 195+00 III a LOT. 5- ! BAXTER CRIle,[E,� \ `3' LOT..8 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE m 38.052 sq.ft. ("' ( `CORRIDOR',• �'1\\- $ 51,512 sq.ft. _ RIM EL-4806.BT6 /� OO P POSED SA HO \ I E 0.83 ac. N �.�OPEN SPACE'., $"• 1.18 0c. -- / I :5' EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE fI 74,524 eq.fa a EXISTING TREE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE S B9'2208^W 200.OV' I Sev'2B'ks E zasr9o' 11 r PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE r I I � I LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA , FIRE HYDRANT L1 N00'40'07"E 55.70' Cl 175.00' 33.96' 11'7'3" - m LOT Q�/ Iw - \ / S89'�853 E ' I I I ag1 '\\ D4 WATER VALVE L2 N00'40'07"E 34.90' C2 225.00' 65.72' 16'44'5" 36295'sgft. I - GdLG 8998 a QJ� I / m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL L3 NOO'40'07'E 50.01' C3 225.00' 57.79' 14'42'56" - / f'p' y. ;\ rry�;. Poro�r A��'1 o�g r r rPy 1- L4 SOO'40'07"W 50.01' C4 225.00' S4.9T 13'59'57" "3;g�p.�ti�.. - 12' I o o a i LS SOO'40'07"W 50,01' Sg��r`"yA' P.U.E. I e e L6 N0031'05"E 50.01' OOOrJE4 -' _S 89'22'68;AT'1$a35'— \ t I' 1 CONTOUR INTERVAL a - O 10, ' SB972'0ti'W306.05_ , . - --- RAY _{,\' o`iRj 1, q LL _ }_ ✓ P.U.E. '`� �\ \- I 1 �t �Os o LOT"3 Z L -- �� { l• �� K 49,63 sq.ft. j 1.13 oc. I\ 1 \ LOT 1 ' \ \ �\ li N 89'2YOB^E 200.05',' I 227,393 2 ,39 s.ft, I` =' v 12 P.U.E. 34 LOT 2 -- I r S -52 013 sq.ft. q F/ 1� � ) 12'P.U.E. / `', •\ I\., \\ II .ate" , _._.. .. - _.._._... I. 25 5 50 R 50 -$"�2'OE^W 20U5 S B9'�4'OB^W 374.96' • OPEN SPACE QPEN SPACE - 10,003 git'0.23 ac. a 18,752 eq.ft.,0.43 ac375 on STOP& STREET 1 HIGHWAY 191 HUFFINE LANE SIGN GRAPHIC SCALE too o eo 100 20o xao ❑ ENGINEERS ❑ MO R R I S O N SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS (IN FEET) PLANNERS I tech= 100 ft. ❑❑ MAIERLE ZINC. SINCE 1945 An Employee-Ou d Company AREA TABLE BASIS OF BEARING P.O.Box 1113 901 Technology BNd. Bozeman,MT 59771 •Phone:(406)587-0721 Fax:(406)587-1176 SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 9 8 LOTS 12.65 AC NORTH 89'02'37" EAST REVISION DATE: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NUMBER 10058 OPEN SPACE 3. AC REVISION DATE: RIGHT-OF-WAY 1.89 AC DRAWN BY: KW DATE: 03/24/99 TOTAL 17.56 AC CHECKED BY: TMH DRAWING NO.: PREPLAT2 JOB NO-: 3130.001 010 0310 SHEET 2 OF 2 PRELWINARY PLAT FOR ; BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR We, the undersigned property owners do hereby certify that we have caused to be surveyed, CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA I the undersigned Thomas M. Henesh, a Registered Land Surveyor, subdivided and platted into tracts, blocks and roads, and other divisions and dedications, as do hereby certify that between , 1999 and 1999 shown by this plat hereunto included, the following described tract of land, to wit: OWNERS: GARDNER GREEN, JR. I surveyed BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION, and platted the same MONTANA RANCH PROPERTIES, INC. PURPOSE: CREATE 8 BUSINESS LOTS AND TO CREATE as shown on the accompanying plat and as described in accordance with the A tract of land located in the SE 1/4 of Section 9, T2S, R5E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, TRIPLE THREE, LLC BAXTER CREEK CORRIDOR/OPEN SPACE provisions of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Section 76-3-101 Montana, and being more porticulary described as follows: - 9 throw h 76-3-625, M.C.A. as amended, and the Bozeman Area 1805 WEST DICKERSON #1 Commencing at the South one-sixteenth corner of the southeast one-quarter of Section 9, BOZEMAN, MT 59715 Subdivision Regulations. Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Montana; Dated this day of 1999. Thence along the South one-sixteenth line of the southeast one-quarter of said Section 9, South 88'56'09' West a distance of 663.25 feet, to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 00'31'05" West a distance of 1229.24 feet, to the North right-of-way line of Thomas M. Henesh Highway 191; - H 10062 LS Thence along said North right-of-way line, South 89'22'08" West a distance of 625.16 feet; Thence North 00'40'07" East a distance of 1224.61 feet, to the South one-sixteenth line of I I the southeast one-quarter of said Section 9; a I Thence along said line, North 88'56'09" East a distance of 622.06 feet, to the True Point of Beginning. _ �� 7' CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION Containing 17.56 acres, more or less, and is subject to all easements of record, e g We, and I, Jack R. Schunke, a Registered The above described tract of land is to be known and designated as BAXTER CREEK -�- Professional Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Montana, BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION, City of Bozeman. Montana; and the lands included in all roads hereby certify that between 199_, and 1999, and parks shown on said plat are hereby granted and donated to the use of the public - the following required improvements were installed in conformance forever. The roadways dedicated to the public are accepted for public use, but the City -� with the approved plans and specifications: ROADS, WATER, SEWER, accepts no responsibility for maintaining the same. The owners agree that the City has no PROJECT - SIGNS, and DRAINAGE. obligation to maintain the roads hereby dedicated to public use. AREA ( _% Jack R. Schunke, /{4615 E. Doted r 1 Morrison-Maierl e, Inc. Gardner Green, Jr. t - Y i� V I C I N T I Y MAP Gardner Green, Jr. Dated STATE OF 'ss' ) NO SCALE COUNTY OF ) On this day of 1999, ITS: Dated before me,o Notary Public for the State of Montana personally Montana Ranch Properties, Inc. appeared known to me to be the person that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for and on behalf of said corporation. ITS: Dated Triple Three, LLC Notary Public for the State of Montana, CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF ADMMLSTRATIVE SERVICES CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS residing at Montana. My commission expires CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER I, Miral Gamradt, the Director of Ad ini rative Services, City of I, Phillip J. Forbes, Director of Public Service for the City of Bozeman, Montana do hereby certify that I have examined the annexed foregoing plat I, Shelley M. Vance, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin Count Bozeman, Montana, do hereby certif at the accompanying plat of of BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION, and find that said plat conforms with y y, Montana, do BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK SUB IVISION has been duly examined and P hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was filed in my office at that all City of Bozeman special assessments assessed and levied on - the amended section 76-4-124(1), M.C.A., removing sanitary restrictions since _o'clock, (a.m., or p.m.), this-day of , A.D., 1999, the land to be subdivided hav een paid. the plat lsinside a master planning area and will be provided with municipal �. and recorded in Book of Plats on Page ITS: Date facilities for the supply of water and disposal for sewage and solid waste. Records of the County Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. Montana Ranch Properties, Inc. DATED this day f A.D., 1999. :ss. DATED this day of , A.D., 1999. Dated this day of A.D., 199_ STATE OF ) COUNTY OF ) Miral Gamradt - Director of Ad inistrctive Services Cityof Boze an Phillip J. Forbes On this day of 1999, Director of Public Service Shelley M. Vance before me,a Notary Public for the State of Montana personally City of Bozeman Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County appeared known to me to be the person that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the some for and on behalf of said corporation. CERTIFICATE OF P&LNNINGDIRECTOR CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER Notary Public for the State of Montana, I, Andrew C. Epple ,fayof Director, of the City-County I, Jeff Krauss, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana do residing at Montana. Planning Board haved the accompanying plat and find that hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been duly examined My commission expires it conforms to subdequirements of Section 76-3-101 CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE and that di real property taxes assessed and levied on the land through 76-3-625, A. to be subdivided are delinquent. I, Phillip J. Forbes, Director of Public Service for the City of Bozeman, DATED this A.D., 1999. Montana do hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been duly Dated this day of A.D., 1999. examined and has been found the some to conform to law, approves it, and hereby accepts the dedication to the City of Bozeman for public use any and all lands shown on the plat as being dedicated to such use. ITS: Date Triple Three, LLC Andrew C. pple, Planning Director Jeff Krauss City-Courvty Planning Board Treasurer of Gallatin County DATED this day of , A.D., 1999. STATE OF COUNTY OF ) Phillip J. Forbes ENGINEERS : On this day of 1999, Director of Public Service, 0 MORRISON SCIENTISTS before me,a Notary Public for the State of Montana personally City of Bozeman O SURVEYORS appeared . known to me to e the ❑❑ MAIERLE INC. PLANNERS person that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowlledged SINCE 1945 to me that she executed the some for and on behalf of said AnEmployee-Owned Company An P.O.Box 1113 901 Technology BNd. Bozeman,Mf 59771 •Phone:(406)587-0721 Fax:(406)587-1176 REVISION DATE: REVISION DATE: Notary Public for the State of Montana, DRAWN BY: KW DATE: 03/24/99 residing at Montana. My commission expires CHECKED BY: TMH DRAWING NO.: PREPLAT1 JOB NO.: 3130.001 010 0310 SHEET 1 OF 2 RECEIVED BY APR 3 Q 1999 CITY-COW4TY MEMORANDUM TO: Debbie Arkell FROM: Mike Potter, Jack Schunke DATE: April 26, 1999 RE: Baxter Creek PUD Dear Debbie, This memo is in response to your memo of 4/19 and the work session meeting with you last • week including discussion for a lot width variance for lots 5,6. The items are addressed in numerical order and doubled up where appropriate: Item 1: All references in Covenants referring to 9 lots will refer to 8 lots. Item 2,7: Baxter Creek Business Park is proposed to accommodate an auto dealership and auto related businesses as well as other compatible businesses. These uses in concert with the Billion Auto Plaza are appropriate for this location while providing certain efficiency and synergy. Outlined below is the refined Allowable Uses List which is intended to avoid use conflicts: a. Allowable Uses. The allowable uses of each lot shall be determined by the Baxter Creek Master Plan provided,however,that any owner shall not be prevented from leasing any building or lot from time,subject,however,to all of the restrictions as may be adopted from time to time by the Owner's Association. b. Business Park Permitted Uses Allowed on All Lots. C. Permissible Uses for Lots 1-8 are as follows: (--- indicates elimination) Antique shop and store Apparel mtd aeeessory store • Aft gallery I • Art supply stores Audio-visual equipment sales and rental Automobile or boat sales and/or rental service Auto supply store .Bakery for on-site sales, e s thmr4 O'0'0'sf, Ba—k-s=and-other financiarinstitut ons= peps Bicycle sales, service and repair shop �ook_and-statianery store_®.,.�., Business and office machine sales, service and repair shop Cigar and-tobacco store lotli'ng and costume and4--ental-shop CaagtA� t,-fiirrief �r shop employing five persetts or less Del'c atesson-and caCering-establisl n�-v Departmet-ster-e- 9mgsteres ,Dry goods-anc-l-notion-store eivisp,. • Essential services (Type I) Equipment sales and service •��r.aa®n-€eed-storage-arrd-ra�ke��rentai-�\l.t'''� r i re s ore -bar-den-st�l�stems-i�leo�sales-oni-}�-- Gift shop , dardwarest,are;-no xterior st-orage-- 1 lobby and eoin Y .�----Hunting-and fib fis ling Mply_stor _!t interior deeerater's shop jewelry and metal eraft store 1:;eather goods and ittggage store Lock and key shop -- aaLo der ca alog-sta • Newspaper affiee 'wand Nursery, pimt Offices (as defined in this title) oi- �'P Office supply and office equipment store Gptieiftn -Paint-and-waflpaper-sfiore Pawn Shop Personal and eetiveitienee seffiees Pet shop Pet grooming shop Photagraphie eqttiptnent and supply store Pieture frame shop Radio or television sales, with�wiuhottt serviee and repair Radio and television studio, withaut transmission towers Research laboratories B Seeondhand stores Sewing mttehine store Shoe store Tailor shop, less than five employees Toy store Shoe repair and shoeshine shopSporting and at�Aetie goods stor`e Travelageney Upholstery shops (excluding on-site upholstery service for cars, boats, trailers, trucks, and other motorized vehicles requiring overnight storage) -Vefi re Wallpaper store Wateh repair shop Wholesale establishments that use samples, but do not stock on premises Automobile repair facilities Automobile service stations y Automobile washing establishments, drive-through Automobile washing establishments, self service N ng ma ena s sales Busiiness;tecbnical`o-r voca`tironal school7(�(,� 'e eenter Essential services (Type II) Morwaries Recreational vehicle sales and/or rental \• es is e • • • Item 24: Page 23, EA/CIA. The LOS of F for the intersection of Huffine Lane and Competition Drive is primarily for a left turn from Competition Drive onto Huffine Lane. Jim Skinner, Montana Department of Transportation, has sent copies of the Baxter Creek traffic study to several MDOT engineers requesting their input. We should receive this information by May 15 and will provide City of Bozeman Planning Staff with our opinion and comments on this matter. Item 25/26: The Baxter Creek and Huffine Lane Corridor Open Space areas in association with the general setbacks and general landscape treatments will have an effect very similar 9 �,^ to Valley Commons Business Park. The building design criteria(all sides desirable) 116 and buffering provision on the north and west edges will establish a positive o-�j -Q`� relationship for future adjoining uses. The proposed addition to the Guidelines is 03 ` Item 10, d, page 21: d. Buffer Plantings: On the north and west edges of the property; Lots 2,3,4,5,6,7, special landscape buffering is required which is to include naturalistic tree groupings with emphasis on Robusta Cottonwood, Aspen, Colorado Spruce and Golden Willow. Item 27: Patmore Ash is the correct tree species and this notation shall be corrected in the covenants. • Item 28: The detention ponds shown on Figure 6 are not intended to be constructed as shown. The ponds show the volume needed and the general location. We anticipate that when the site plan for each lot is completed,the ponds will be incorporated into the landscaping. Item 29: To clarify the wetlands summary and to explain why the wetlands area is larger than the park area we are enclosing a copy of the Nationwide Permit issued by the Corp of Engineers. This permit allows improvements to encroach on wetlands due to acceptable compensatory mitigation outlined in the proposal by Wetlands West,Inc. Item 30: We understand your concern in reducing the 60 foot right-of-way by 10 feet, t to however,we would like to point out that Valley Commons has 50 foot rights-of-ways 0 r that work very well. This will also help us reach our objective and concept plan to k� provide an `open' corridor along Competition Drive. This will provide better visual exposure of the businesses within the development. We have attached a copy of the proposed street section for the development which is the same section as Valley Commons. Item 31: We anticipate that the full 60 foot right-of-way for the future extension of Fallon - Street will be within the property north of the Baxter Creek Business Park and the S�v J.C. Billion Auto Plaza. • Item 32: All sidewalks adjacent to lots will be constructed within three ears of final plat Y • 0 • filing or when the lot is developed, whichever comes first. All sidewalks within or adjacent to open space will be constructed within one year of final plat filing. Thanks for your help and patience with this myriad of details. Essentially, Baxter Creek Business Park is modeled after Valley Commons Business Park. As with all projects there are differences which require unique solutions. We look forward to progressing forward and are available to answer questions or provide additional clarification. MEP:ct H A313 0\001\APR26ARK.wpd • • 'e erinary clinic Wholesale distributors with on-premise retail outlets, providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises. Item 3: Page 3,Covenants,#1.5 revised as follows: (i)50 foot right-of-ways on Competition Drive,Norton Street and east boundary road including boulevard landscape. Item 4: Page 5, Covenants, #4.2. Revised guidelines to define nuisances. Item 5: Page 5, Guidelines. Top of page #c revised to require submittal of CDR approval with the City of Bozeman building permit application. Item 6: Page 8,Guidelines,#2 the first sentence is eliminated. Baxter Creek Business Park is not consistent with the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Bozeman once the PUD allows for higher uses in the BP category. a Q.Fxj a e, s Item 8: Page 13,Guidelines,#3,first paragraph revised as follows:The required number and configuration of off-street. spaces shall be provided by the applicant in accordance wit -1"8.50.120.B(3 _ofihe City of Bozeman Zone Code unless a variance or deviation is gr't d-by the City Co fission. .ti Wl. C �� • Item 9: Page 13, Guidelines, #3, second paragraph revised as follows: Parking areas shall be placed adjacent to, beside or behind buildings. 5 v —e- L-A_ kr� Item 10: Page 21,Guidelines,#12,paragraph b revised as follows:Boulevard landscaping and sidewalks on all public and private street frontages on each lot at the time the property is developed or within three years of final plat recording,whichever comes first. Page 21,Guidelines,#12,paragraph c revised as follows:Common area landscaping and sidewalks shall be installed at the time of initial development construction or within one year of final plat recording. Item 11: Page 15,Guidelines,#6 paragraph two revised as follows:Lights shall be down type and shall not radiate out from the property. Street lights will be installed by Montana Power and will be their standard street-lights:-Lighting on each lot will be installed when the lot is developed using standard fixturesn all cases, excessive glare to neighboring properties or reflection shall be avoided.'' (A copy of Montana Power Standard Street Lights are enclosed with this memo). Item 12: Fire protection, page 28 of Guidelines revised to indicate buildings shall be fire sprinkled consistent with the Annexation Agreement. (This stipulation subject to further review independent of PUD process) • Item 13: Page 28,Guidelines, Section B first paragraph revised as follows: There shall be no exterior open burning or fires whatsoever allowed onsite. Item 14: Page 29, Guidelines, Section B revise by adding #8 Construction Routes- The subdivider shall require all construction related traffic associated with the continued development of the Baxter Creek Business Park to be routed to and from n the site via Huffine Lane; st of Ferguson Road,..and to not utilize West Babcock Street or ° Durston e�o Ferguson Road.-` i Item 15: Several important points regarding setbacks and building/asphalt coverage include: A) The key perimeter setbacks include 35'from the Corridor Open Space along Huffine Lane for parking and buildings and 25' for the of er property perimeters for buildings and 15'for parking. Internally,the building setbacks r� for Competition Drive and Norton Street are a minimum of 25' and most building envelopes are substantially more. Internal parking setbacks from k•''road right-of-way is a minimum of 10'. We found such setbacks and layouts u,r very effective at Valley Commons. B) Each building envelope includes landscape and open space equivalent to 8% of the particular lot. For example, on lot #2 the lot area is 52,013 sf. Therefore,8%of the 52,013 sf lot=4,160 sf which will be lands taped within \ v. � the 12,911 sf building envelope. We used a similar approach at Valley • ,iJ Commons Business Park and it worked quite well. \c � Item 16: Several clarifications regarding open space and landscaping embellishments include: A) The Huffine Lane Corridor Open Space will be spray irrigated,.will include blue grass lawn, accent trees and a 6' wide curvilinear concrete pedestrian path. B) The Baxter Creek Corridor Open Space will include restoration of Baxter Creek into a meandering stream with natural wetlands species along the creek and native grasses elsewhere. C) The individual building envelopes will include perimeter sidewalks along parking areas. The 8%of lot area landscape requirement is required within each envelope and under Section II. Site Development, A. Site Features, 5 Public Terraces the following is required: "Public terraces shall be designed to enhance the overall architecture of the building by creating important common public spaces in the transition zones between parking area and individual or collective buildings. Public terraces shall be finished with paving materials common to the Business Park and • shall emphasize building entries through both axial and non-axial J arrangements of landscape materials,paving and site furnishings." Item 17: Wetlands West(Donna Lovell)has prepared the Baxter Creek enhancement plan, the plan is scheduled for review with Parks Advisory Board which will influence the location of the 15' trail easement. The picnic area will be installed within one year of plat recording. The plant materials (trees) used in proximity to the open space trees at Billion Auto Plaza will be Aspen and Spruce. 18 trees in :his area are contemplated. Item 18: A delineation of the floodplain for the realigned Baxter Creek is included with this memo. The delineation of the floodplain will be within the limits of the open space area. Item 19: A copy of the final plat will show the 35-foot watercourse setback along Baxter Creek. The trail will be located such that it will not be within the watercourse setback. Item 20: The Final Plat will be revised to read Norton Street. A letter has been sent to the Director of Public Service/City Engineer requesting approval for the street to be named Norton Street. City staff advised by phone that the name Norton Street was acceptable. Item 21: We anticipate that the construction of Fallon Street will be during the development of the property bordering the north property line of the Baxter Creek Business Park. We also anticipate that right-of-way for this street will be granted by that property (Norton property). Due to the configuration of the present development in the north part of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza and the proposed lot configuration of the Baxter Creek Business Park would make it very difficult to construct any portion of Fallon Street on either of these properties. Item 22: We provide the following clarification in regard to cuts and fill in the street sections on Page 5 of the EA/CIA: During street construction topsoil or overburden will be removed down to the underlying gravels. We estimate that this will require up to a 3 foot cut in some areas. These areas will be filled with sub base and base gravels and pavement bringing the finished road surface to approximately f 6 inches above the existing surface. Additional fill areas will be at Baxter Creek and Competition Drive and for the intersection of Competition Drive and Huffine Lane. Item 23:. Two test pits were dug to observe the level of groundwater and determine the depth of the underlying gravel. The two test pits were dug on the west side of Baxter Creek in the Competition Drive alignment. We are aware of the level of groundwater in this area, but feel that replacing all topsoil and overburden down to the underlying gravels with sub base and base gravels,we will provide a solid base for the proposed streets and other improvements proposed. High ground water conditions are present in the majority of the westerly area of Bozeman. Proper engineering design will take • this condition into account. (E ENGINEERS MORRIIN SCIENTISTS 1 INC. SURVEYORS n ��1 MMERLE, INC 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 • FAX:4 6-587-176 • An Employee-Owned Company April 27, 1999 Debbie Arkel' City/County Planner P. O. Box 640 Bozeman, MT 59771-0640 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park PUD 3130.001.010.0310 Dear Debbie: The owners of the proposed Baxter Creek Business Park project request a variance from the required 150 foot lot frontage for Lot#6 and Lot#5. By reducing the lot frontage for these two lots, more area can be set aside for the Baxter Creek,corridor. Thank you. • Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office MS:Inm H A313 0\OO 1\W PD\v ari an c.wp d • Beginning Our Second Half Century • • i � � • ' • rz- lv1 February 26, 1999 The Montana Power Company Lease Lighting Catalog • Residential Lawn lighter: 50 Watt, High Pressure Sodium,black r Pole: 8 foot mounting height fiberglass pole,direct buried, black ( W. L�ipa fix .�_..1.v:..t..«._�....::..a_.z A. Decorative Lexington: 100 Watt,High Pressure Sodium,Multi-Tap Ballast, black Pole: 12 foot Mounting Height,fiberglass,round tapered,direct buried,black s y: !'`f Contemporary: 100 Watt, High Pressure Sodium, Multi-Tap Ballast,gray , rt a " Pole: 16 foot Mounting Height,fiberglass, round tapered,direct buried,gray 7 � a CSt T y�.44 a $ WIM 41 Acorn: 100 Watt, High Pressure Sodium, Multi-Tap Ballast - t, >, : � Pole: 14' Mounting Height Pole,direct buried R ,v � Area Shoebox: 250Watt Hiah Pressure Sodium,type II1, multi-tap ballast bronze . P Pole: 20' mounting height,5x5 square,direct bury fiberglass, bronze Shoebox:400Watt High Pressure Sodium,type III,multi-tap ballast,bronze r . Pole: 25' mounting height,5x5 square,direct bury fiberglass,bronze Shoebox: 250 Watt, Metal Halide,type III,multi-tap ballast, bronze Pole: 20' mounting height, 5x5 square,direct bury fiberglass,bronze Shoebox: 400 Watt,Metal Halide,type III,multi-tap ballast,bronze Pole: 25' mounting height, 5x5 square,direct bury fiberglass,bronze tl � Utility Flood: 250/400 Watt, High Pressure Sodium,multi-tap ballast,NEMA 7x6 ' Utility Flood:250/400 Watt, Metal Halide,multi-tap ballast,NEMA 7x6 i� 7�rok•. lei Yard light: 100 Watt, High Pressure Sodium yard light pack,type V • Roadvvay G ` Cobra Head: 70/100 Watt, High Pressure Sodium,medium semi-cutoff,type III,multi-tap _ 4 Cobra Head: 200 Watt, High Pressure Sodium,medium semi-cutoff,type I1I,multi-tap " Cobra Head: 400 Watt, High Pressure Sodium,medium semi-cutoff,type 111, multi-tap 71 Cobra Head:200 Watt,High Pressure Sodium,medium cutoff,type III,multi-tap Cobra Head:400 Watt,High Pressure Sodium,medium cutoff,type III,multi-tap Cobra Head: 200 Watt,Metal Halide,medium semi-cutoff,type III,multi-tap . Cobra Head:400 Watt,Metal Halide,medium semi-cutoff,type III,multi-tap # rS Y Roadway Poles Pole: 26 Foot Mounting Height, steel or fiberglass Pole: 30 Foot Mounting Height,steel or fiberglass Pole: 34 Foot Mounting Height, steel • I • • • • i ��• Winn +01 g��a EXISTING CMP -- ' ¢ 2 z I ~_ W<ISS5��< OF I I I• o00 Ng�gama�i I I � I i �• I I ! S00131'oS�Y. 1229.24' I �oli� I L - eto — — FLOOD PLAT /; ® ®.. • ® //.. — — — _ _ LOT eta \ I I a I I ' WATERCO RSE SETBACK II I i I LOT #7 I 9� O PLA II D ON POND / i I ro 5 I T 2, 1'xi.5. O DISCHARG BEN / v / 35' ATERCO RSE SET CK I ( I I I SIDE SLOPES 2:1 D / / R LI ED, 'BAXT CRE K LOT #1 D ON POND 1 ' 1 ✓ 21'x21•x 5. O DISCHHAAq"E[,WNN�� DETENTION POND I c SLo 21 v 1 46'x46'x2.5' O DISC GE END N / •1 / � SIDE SLOPES 2:1 \ \ LF ( RCP I *.W/10' DRAINAGE EMENi i I i I $ I \ NV. 4798.iP LJ g I I '° PLAIN \ I � m - D ON NO I I I I . SID LOPES 3:1 228 �TO 13 LF 12• RCP -- —�SLOPE-2 .T. z a W m SLOPE-2.5% I o o c • + o p o - i I 12' RC - I I LOPE=1� _ _ I i I 120 LF 1 ' RCP I �• I ETENTION POND / / P r— — — GUTTER- 3•x23•x1.5' O ISCHARGE END LOT #4 I IDE SLOPES .1 LOT #S I �• ` Q I 3 WATERCO RS I I I I i I I LOT #2 W LLI I - S BACK I I I ( LOT #3 I I I I I I LOT #6 I I e I I m Q w I I I I RELEASE STIR I I I I W Ld F-- 20E Onx011.5 O DISC END ETENTION POND OtillI DETENTION POND DETENTION POND I I j W O Q I P •1 I 2 •x20'x1.5' O DISC E EN I 24xz4x1.5 O DISCHARGE D 7 'xl. ' O I C Q co I I I•, S DE SLO ES 2. B x 0 5 D HARGE END I SI SLOPES 2:1 SIDE SLOPES.2:1 I SIDE SLOPES 2: � ! � � ! V 3 I Of _ _ o _ — . . — . . — . . — : . — ..:— . . — . . — . — . . — . . — . .//FETS —. . — . — . :— — ..... ..... 15' RC CULVERT CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE ALE Q\ I ` m V) NFORCE DRAINAGE SW LE SLOPE 1.5R SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET — CY RIPRAP 2.3' GRAPHIC SCALE MATERaL PROJECT N0. m a y +m m FROM SWALE 1.5' 3130.001 030 0310 EXCAVATION SHEET NUMBER (N OR W Fm OF SWALE) DRAWING NUMBER '-- 60 K DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) FIGURE#9 etam.or: APR-27-99 01 :39 PM P. 02 r �l'�:•: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY COPPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTAICT 21S NORTH 17TH STREET ONIAHA,NE©RASKA 88102•4078 • REPLY TO ATTENTION cF September 29, 1998 US Army Corps of Engineers 301 South Park RECE� Drawer 10014 L D OCT 0 Helena MT 59626-0014 (406) 441-1375 Subject: Action ID Number 199890655 Steve Olson For Gardiner Green, Jr. 1805 West Dickerson, #1 Bozeman, Montana 59715 Dear Mr. Olson: Reference is made to the Department of the Army application submitted on bcllaif of Gardiner Green, Jr., Montana Ranch Properties, and Triple Three LLC, for authorization to place a culverted road crossing in Baxter Creek and place fill material in a wetland associated • with the Baxter Creek Business Park. The project is Iocated in the SETA of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Gallatin County, Montana. Based on the information provided, this office has determined that the proposed 1.11 acres of wetland impacts are authorized by the Department of the Army Nationwide Pennit Number 26, found in the December 13, 1996 Federal Register, Final Notice of Issuance, Ressuarnce and Modification of Nationwide Permits (61 PR 65874). Enclosed is a fact sheet which describes this Nationwide Permit and lists the general and/or Section 404 only conditions which must be adhered to for this authorization to remain valid, In addition to the general conditions, this authorization is contingent upon the special condition that the unavoidable impacts to wetlands will be compensated. The mitigation proposal submitted by Wetlands West, Inc., proposing the creation of .5 acre of fringe wetlands and rehabilitating Baxter Creek by increasing sinuosity and incorporating pools and riffles for fish habitat is acceptable compensatory mitigation for the inipacts authorized by this perniit. Although an individual Department of the Anny Permit involving a public interest review will not be required for the project, this does not eliminate the requirement that you obtain any other applicable Federal, state, tribal and local permits as required. Please note that deviations from the original plans and specifications of your project could require additional authorization from this office. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality has • waived water quality certification for this project pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, however, this dues not eliminate the need to obtain other permits that cony be rck1t6rcd by r•ruUai rnt O 4nCyr.IRA 03060 APR-27-99 01 :40 PM P. 03 that agency. You are responsible for all work accomplished in accordance with the terins and conditions of th.e nationwide permit. If a contractor or other authorized representative will be accomplishing the work authorized by this permit in your behalf, it is your responsibility to provide a copy of this letter and the attached conditions to them so that they are aware of the limitations of this authorization. Any activity which fails to comply with all of the terns and conditions of this authorization will be considered unauthorized and subject to appropriate enforcement action. You are advised that this verification of the Nationwide Permit authorization is valid until December 13, 1998. The Corps has proposed to extend the expiration of NWP 26 until March 28, 1999. (See July 1, 1998 Federal Register, 63 FR 36040.) The Corps' decision on the expiration date of NWP 26 will be published in the Federal Register. Permittccs who receive a NWP 26 authorization before it expires will have up to 12 months to complete the authorized activity, provided they have commenced construction or are under contract to commence construction prior to the expiration of date of the NWP (either December 13, 199S or March 28, 1999). In compliance with General Condition #14, the attached Compliance Certification fortrt must be signed and returned to this office upon completion of the authorized work and any required mitigation. Should you become aware that either an endangered and/or threatened species or its critical y 8 p habitat exists within the project area, you must immediately notify this office. If there are any questions concerning this authorization, please contact Jean Ramer of my staff at telephone (406) 441-1375 and reference Nationwide Permit 199890655. Sincerely, Allan Steinle Montana Program Manager Enclosures cc: Donna Lovell, Wetlands West, Inc. • • • I I I i • 3 50' R.O.W. Of 5' 25' 25' 5' C.O.B. STD. , C.O.B. STD. SIDEWALK 20 20 SIDEWALK (WHERE SHOWN) 5'-- 15' 15' --5' (WHERE SHOWN) 2 - r 2. 13 13 ~2 1 M PX n qX. 2.00% 2.00% 00� I 2. 07 2.00� 2.007. 3: 1 44,4 4" DEPTH - 1 " CRUSHED-,---" RUSHED "ISTORM-WATER ~ 9„ T1,P GRAVEL AGGREGATE g"TYP -- SEWER 6" TYP. 3" DEPTH . , LINE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 4" DEPTH 1 " CRUSHED 4" DEPTH GRAVEL AGGREGATE 1 " CRUSHED BASE COURSE 1 1 18"-36" DEPTH SELECT WATER LINE SUB BASE COURSE C. O. B . STREET DETAIL R-2 (SCALE: 1"=10') • Wo( EIVED w Please Re To -CITY COON►w PLAiMING OFFICE MA 3 0 1999 20 E. %IVE BOZENi u , "VIT 59715 TY-�... .. .a.:i�r BAXTER- CREEK BUSINESS PARK P.,U.,D. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Prepared For: Gardiner Green, Jr.� and Steve Olson Prepared By: : ; Morrisorn-IVlaierle Inc.,-Engineers In"Associ:ation With' e Michael E,� Petters,Planner Ivlarcl 29;1*999 BAXTER CREEK .B.USIN-ESS, PARK . PRELI'MINARY PLAT APPLICATION epa ed for- Gar ner Green,,.Jr and Steve Olson Prepared By: Morrison=Maierle,-Inc., .Engineers. In Association With Michael E.; Potter- Planner" March 29,.19.99 • • • BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK P.U.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS PARTI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pagel EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 PARTII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . Page 2 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 Surface Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 Geology - Soils - Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 4 Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7 Wildlife . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9 Historical Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9 Visual Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9 • COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 10 Water Supply Page 10 Sanitary Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 11 Solid Waste Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 11 Streets and Roads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page11 Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page-13 Emergency Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page14 Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page14 LandUse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page15 Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page15 Parks and Recreation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 15 Taxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page16 Accessibility of Service Systems and Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 21 Effects on Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 21 Effects on Agricultural Water User Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 22 SUMMARY OF PROBABLE IMPACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 23 The Effect on Agriculture: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 23 The Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 23 The Effect on Local Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 23 The Effect on the Natural Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 24 The Effect on Wildlife Habitat . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 25 The Effect on Public Health and Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 25 • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment i • PART III.A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 26 PUD APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 26 PUD Submittal Requirements (Chapter 18.54.60, B) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 26 Document Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 26 Preliminary Site Plan Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 28 Supplemental Plan Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 29 PARTIII.B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . Page30 INTENT OF PUD (Response to Chapter 18.54.020) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 30 PARTIII.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 33 PUD Criteria (Response to Chapter 18.54.100) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 33 All Development Criteria(Neighborhood Compatibility) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 33 All Development Criteria(Public Facilities, Services and Transportation) Page 34 All Development Criteria(Natural Resources) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 35 All Development Criteria(Site Design) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 37 Commercial PUD: Required Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 41 PART IV • DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND COVENANTS Appendix Adjacent Owners List Traffic Study NRCS Soils Information Agency Letters Weed Management Plan • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment ii • • PART I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Baxter Creek Business Park is a18=lot commercial'-PUD located on Bozeman's west side off Huffine Lane (Highway 191) next to the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza PUD. Total lot area is 1�7_.:50 acres. Lo#1"is the gest`by far`at-5.22,acresmiThe intention is that this lot will be the home of aer-elocatedtautomob le.dealer-shi-p:insBozeman. The remaining 77-1ots:vary•from.0-.83 to.122 acres. Uses on these will be limited to mor-e t ad-itiona off e/commerc-ial-uses, as determined by -� the project's Development Guidelines. Specific buildings are not proposed as a part of the PUD application. The Development Guidelines, which are patterned aftesthe Valley Gommons-PUD guidelines, will coritrol:future,,� buildingland=land cs ape design, coAstructionland�-ffi-aintenance The Landscaping Plan, which follows, illustrates the design concept of the Business park. The intention is to create t o v su corridors.through-the-site-to minimize'th`e-apparent:building.mass next'-to`H` - uf^f_n_*e"Lane,. One-ofthe orridors-isrcreated-by=a-new-street,4C=omgetition Dnv a d"its landscapddmedians. The other is created by the open-spaceTcorridor;�of;BaxterrCreek, which is a continuation of the open space theme started by Billion Plaza. Circulation into the site will be via Huff e L-Ynexand�Compet-tion-Drive;w—h-ch=connects.to. • Cotto onw od'Road. The site will be integrated into future road corridors in the area with connections provided to future, off site roads on the north and west. Underlying zoning-of the site is'-B=P-(Business-Pa`r-k). The proposed Baxter Creek Development Guidelines and Site Plan will modif-yithe B-P permitted use 1=ist)and createrdeviationssto zoning and;subdivision s andards. The following items are rrequ d variances-to't-He,standar-ds= elaMiriimum-lotsize1would'UFreduceefrom-l=acre,toT approximately�3/_4--acr-e�L-.zo 2. Allowablelmaxirn lmu of cover-age-would-,be�increased-to'm-ore,-than 60%;,as shown by the building envelopes and parking areas on the Site Plan. 3. Setback-,distances-would`b re edaced 0 10=feet-foripar-kingyareas-along=str-eets, l6ifeet„ for parki-ng3along-exterior= r-dpertyzlines,.25Yfeetiforall-build ng:setbacks=and:0 (lip feet=onYsde�yards-ithat�share•parking-aecesstor spaces. A�3-5 foot=setb`ack=fromLLthe 5.0 foot "—pen e p ce,corridor,alongHighway'191-wi1l:b me aintained� 4. The right-of way-�widtli for Competition Drive-and=Norton Street are requested to be t '50;feet. Noon=streetzparking-would be�allowed�' r/ 5. The co strucfed:.width-,of-Competition Drive and Norton Street are requeste&to,be.3:01 b==O 'feet;-,rather--th h typical=37-fdet-�w en on-street parking is allowed. 6. The Applicli would construc"t-ithe=si-dewalks,adjaceriftorthe openrspaces dur-ing=initial construction. A variance=is.r-eques-ted,tosot construct=the'sid we alks=adjacent to the..individual-lots-until.construetionaon,the ind v-idual=lots-is complete. This is to avoid the inevitable destruction of the sidewalks during construction and tae !/ expense of building them twice. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 1 • • PART II ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. is an eight lot commercial subdivision located adjacent to Billion Auto Plaza on the north side of Huffine Lane. The site has frontage on Huffine Lane and will utilize a new access that is located approximately 1000 feet West of the intersection of Huffine Lane and Cottonwood Road. The new access will provide on-site circulation and connection to Competition Drive within Billion Auto Plaza. The Business Park is a 17.56 acre tract located in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East and was recently annexed as part of the Valley West Annexation. It is located in the extreme southwest corner of the Valley West Annexation, which is shown in Figure#1. Figure #2, Vicinity Map, shows the project site in relation to the City of Bozeman. (There is a mapping discrepancy between acreage shown on the PUD site plan and the Preliminary Plat. After more detailed survey calculations, the actual acreage is 17.56 acres, as shown on the Plat. The PUD plan shows 17.53 acres. The 0.03 acre difference makes no difference in the percent calculations that will follow.) Development within the Business Park will be guided by Developmental Guidelines and • covenants that restrict allowable uses and control architectural and landscaping design. Title building and landscaping design theme will be the same as that used for the Valley Commons commercial PUD on Huffine Lane. Sewer and water will be provided by connection to City of Bozeman services in Cottonwood Road, which were recently extended as part of the Valley West Annexation. The application document is formatted to present the subdivision application and Environmental- Community Impact Assessment first. This is followed by the Summary of Probable Impacts, PUD application and Development Guidelines and Covenants. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 2 20* 21 21T 0 0 18 18 CALLA IN COUNTY ZONING �)ISTRJOT $' 10, I PLI �,` �i a, AO I I io� 18 1011w % N� DLMSTON RD.. �k J. 1l171 7X e. t 641.4 At W ff7 Z 12 OU F,c 4 A.0 tl 0 16 7 VT 0 0 R3 137.6 AC o B 1 0 00 4.0 AC f U') D iL co 1011W 8 89 R3 RO 40.5 AC .................... B P 8 AC 0 B P 10.2 AIC11" 7 HUFFIN8 LANE CITY LIMITS A 19.6 AC s > <; r;�` 1-4-1 Ff i ► 'LEY YA, TION AANE N _G- 9 m RISON C73 ERLEje. 4) LD Pit I Iail LLI 3130\EXHI8ITS\F1 OPK1 3.DWG F-I G- URE #I VICINITY MAP Vi'I ) i'"\ + - ,; _ ! , � .e r \''••i 'b� II I I Tsr � �; "�`/:i I ,', ,``,.+>1,J^s`' _ _�,.y-(�tr'" �..�yr�.`3 / ? '•,f. _ �l ,':y- ..� Yr• I rht 1! r�\L..�`• -\ \�.•�, �1.� "--,v.�, r�"*" Kcd. � ''`\ !>�': 'i I M'.� a :k",-.^ I, t r? .:, .... j' � `.. ,,.�` _ { - - -�� ee.tzl-s,\� --`{.e. �h _ .. „�;- .`:\' ;L�J° :`L^,� _ ••r r' , P..k'\ y I r- ._.\ w�, l ,-�`vr:..,`.,• �'� `-)4��`!,•.;J ,7, p 't i I I _��/-•.__ 1 I 1.4i .i::- ,f• \\ .ar,'9f r65',3.T :�d:~t. 5 �__..,v: 'r'�•"'; I 749 \5( C�•T•' •w', SSP \�. _ _ \ ,I \ law- 721 upi wt _ _ • ',ter �r 4y�`„Y'.u't'sa \4•t,.,'J IRA i \ ••'1:. Ar .-. .w___ .,,off". 4 'i *fo'--'.i,• 'i',r. I .. ? i k _ S� 14 ii,"FrP \Cd+ 30 i I i' 7� 7{5 Ff'7 .,\;n3r \^...-�-r' I I•�t R` ` _ 1�} 4 -y:' fir., 3? `; : i-�'7 ✓ i P ;i g _ II { I 61 :1�• [ --! �,�._ y �I' „„y.'yy,; �".: , I 1 ./ ��(I ' � L 'I>\•C'-'b.� _ - `. - i :�t.,!''ail}; :'r+[ia•�! Tree! s,5cN2 •t, %�r�,pN;" _� r `� r :k � i f .i'� :i'-u � i ` - '1 ' r f \`,& a,•. _ v 111(i i ,Y '<na p,,.E, _- .._Vie' 'C1:5 -��jra"'Ra r :. I I; �y� I• �'� is , i" 1 �•! ./i r1 `�Y` rSs"••��•. �''... ::I r~ J" jj j re F6 i •73Brrr�a I �i��-..��: "0A .. ..'i.,/r .- .I ". .�(?::• ,)I' �`\1 ` I`p11-i• •i:F. •.;�.� -'°o- tirv,. -`gig^ u , _ ;" _�;_I•; _ , r I I ._._...... ._._� ;•i i�7ocr• •�:,,.1::,9:''H f ', ,c,4 !(�� ,i'i _ •_I �'I.Y, .j- +`r .5. I"' II SI t r I ��..K.n 1 I e,,:_-•. .{.ryF, ,I '�- f•:.. ,� - .4�; IT' a� y1,1� '` � [� ,� �• I /' .' '��` �.���'� �1� r.� j i i(ri,.�. ... '' i i �aj _•_-/ i .k,., I•._ fit ;a ! M 1 1 I i 46�T ..'.. I� ..f•..�3 -4+L'}a `.W F"G'C ,I I._ 4�.9� SS 'A t -� •-�.-'r I ' I Ir_ ., 4lr,•,. A� IMi�4 .p S&' 2, :,�.. '+ f I I 9 � •'!\ „' ._: ;� �'` • ;•-��•-i�^^.,'I•_�' - '1� i'-� - � ^� � -. IAilk I r'f ' 7 1 �+ Y � er3: 'r: _ .`'�{.. i, T�n/-...,..Y.-�,aa "r{�, �'/I a•�•r _�'- { I j L�-_ � .�d u �I � Y Z � 1, ���'tom r-- .' t _..a: "•s'.' ;6'}..,::?/';-�'t —'1_, i ees::k ''� �s: •` ap�•':r�.:,JrG." I _,_. _-' _. a �., ^IrWI li ' j: ` f , 1 i • 1 I:'::(, 'ice'— 4'vlw,'�'r�,`�il ir. f •'.. t}�.• '�T I�i• '\ ir-�•...—_ 'A_' _.r-" ;. } _ i r :r P K t17. _ 1 4 �I .;_ P:,,.i. 4 ��-•.:, t•:.�,,. '�.t}},ls."'.(i -'� i,i -......_--�.-•r....... .... •�` �'.ra,�'�`1 7 �.s,e ..,� E,y4 r3rh P1. I` /` _�\ i - - ,ey •t • : !i ! •;: 'r" '3' ca9;= I49J:', 1: An' _ :�:•g?.; _.r 2S}yv.- a .:.. .,.,N %� �, Ail . A�r.•."; _ ._t...._'k�i- /"• ,; `•,�!I %b.C' ii � .'�,�, jam,.. I 'I is r tt' -•�. 1 _�.. I t PA N n,•; ,, '�,; 5 .,b , _/.y,• u'�Ynp<+p. rj iF -•-} ^h...-:.-r.• p �'I - r r ::V^ ,a'• Z. , - •F itY�' :.f�,:I _ - _ ^ ii. •'` >,n - ; Nw 'd - t I -�•�s'a � ^a f �1 : ,¢w:: 's�°�.•' .\..i. •s" j' J;:E•?,,"`' c'+7" .tq.. saC6s " ,sui9•t _'- _ sp81 2 sr:4r t FIGURE # - - ( .""-....... .. __`_i•'� -?!iT;.,. ... 'K• Sart ,, iraHcrr..i},'n, a3GG.., _. r.. ,:,, \ i ,,.%" - I I I� �•`,`' "-''"ifs. YFJ GRAPHIC SCALE N ;.!; `; � , . ..•. "I�: I_.:.... � ENCIND7rS 'B�..•.: •.i .._..;::,. ,..,. . .� >.` „_. S.J.: K h.+ :r IJ -i`� - r CC ❑ SCFNILSIS :g.,. :: . :...; _ ,.:.. �. _.... X. " - MORRISON 4000 0 2000 4000 8000 SURVEYORS - MAIERLE,INC. KANNERS • ' P.O.&[1113 901 U*,obO 94 Buivoa�n 59771•R=(400 587-M �(1M W-1179 IN FEET RENSION DATE: Lv RE1+ISION DAIS 1 inch = 4000ft. DRAWN BY: KW DATE:02/01/99 CHECKED BY: DRAWING NO.: 4MAP-F2.DV0G I '{ JOB NO.: 3130.001 010 0310 SHEET 1 OF 1 +r R 9 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A. Surface Water One water course, Baxter Creek, crosses the project site diagonally from south to north. B.axter_C-reek=enters the property on the east boundary approximately 450 feet north of Huffine Lane then exits the property approximately mid way along the north boundary. (See Aerial Site Map Figure 3.) Traversingtheeast-half ofthe=northerri margin-of thesite is a second=ditch, The_ditch empties=into Baxter Creek within the project boundaries and . is shown on the site plan for the project. The source of water for this ditch is aground water drain for the Billion Plaza subdivision. Surface water issues are addressed in m additional detail within the wetlands discussion. T:o protect and=enhance Baxter Creek,2.36 acres of open space are proposedto be set aside as the Baxter Creek Corridor with several riparian area enhancements. (See Preliminary PUD Site Plan, Figure 4.) As noted in the Wetland Delineation for the site, �portions�of-Baxter_Creek-have recently realigned. The proposed enhancement measures would incl:ud"e ollacement_of-Baxter Cre-ek_back-in its-former channel-along portions of its course. The stream corridor open space proposed in this project would be=a=continuation ---- - - ---- ofthe-strearn=corridor established-by the-Billion Auto Plaza subdivision. • As part of the plan to protect and conserve surface waters, applications will be made to the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Service for 310 permits to ,discharge treated -to-Baxter:Creek. Stormwater treatment will be provided on a per lot basis. Detention,ponds,:wiitth_outlet structures,-on lots 1 -7 and 8, will discharge direre`ct-1-y=to=Baxter--Creek while detention--ponds on lots 2, 3, 4,-5 and 6, will discharge stormwater_to=a=proposed-drainage:ditch-.to;be constructed along the west boundary of the proposed subdivision. A_310_permit w411 also-be_obtained-for-a-48"-(R.C.P) culvert (estimated size) wh_ch will be placed in Baxter Greek-for-the-extension of Competition Drive into the proposed -�5 subdivision. An-addition—al�crossing-of Baxter Creek near-the north boundary of the Baxter Creek project wili=be=required-when Fallon Street is extended by others fn the ,future. A 404-perrriit=has-been-obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers for all wetland enhancements. B. Groundwater Information supplied by the Department of Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) indicates that groundwater-depths are4-t6=3.5 feet=below thesurface. (See Appendix section titled, "Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Information"). ' I • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 3 I g �,§Ah, 1�0 .1 110,JIDg gw F-ge-p— Am M, 710 "M 0" �.vj,glmfl "M "M .-RAN 0 V R N. Mm n =W,a W L 1A,Q.,I A dw P ,&M 22n, M m R m p g Sn't ossm, AM MEMO= pow oTgjgjp;, 111,"1140 3,� R'?g w agg USA of -mv, s M111A.i 011 ORIN R 20, m_6 ig, AM- g-gER's HTR��_-t, R g M", kggg g, Ilk M I All,Mill,1111, �g, wou'l m ,% qq �14 IT glaxom-51 ig­� 0 Fj�r- tvg� ­M A �k�Vt W g ks N wo g tw= - g At- W R .0 51 MOR s SRI �gg gz-T�m,, 01 1,-01, P ON 56, -9--m @74" Hl- ;Z.No ow-- 6 0-51 zz vAg ,"Z', W_ m oz Wh IN gim ag M "ie R al, gq, "i"I" Apul "7 lal hlro� M A kill","Im .s Kt ORION Wlffi`�,QW & g fill?I R W, R WON R V 0 �gg 8MI. ggg. 6 gp-,p 1z, M gwgk"Um Mg. 1.-��§ ,,\% _..mz ON'. g- .11 W.," vg �ow�- -W-_.�Rgw_mm p RIRIE 'N"M W rNmi- m, gm VS, ffl,NMI -OR Won —_,f�t e� to a Z AN MINES, -N ,g _100 I Eli gul", ,R$4 g p,� g j_01 g, a. a V1110 io t, PREWED BY: iBAXTER CREEK' BUSINESS PARK PUD MORRISON SCIENTISTS !� AERIAL SITE P LAN SUWEMRS KANNERS INC. SINCE i94j M MAIERLEJ A,s*vbvw-o-,"avw PA Sm M3 91 IW�*V Biwl Bm..,� III SM P..(4m)5m 1:BOZEMAN, MONTANA .2S, R5E COUNTY SCALE: 1 100' FIG UP, E #3 r i ;- . � � � � r i :III •06 •p - - �"Ij`1°`I'h'1'll'Illi'1141,+ry�k'1'!!!4!+I''M1;M1'!i`I'1'h'tilihi 411 n'V'I4+'!+�k!I14"'I I VII h h11 w.h`!''!:`lyi' dl 41',4 n� 41111 �11�1 I VI 1114'19,4 III h41�I I.. Ilyr1!11 Wh�n vll'e�hpA ;pl4;h' •:IY;"'14i4"J';'kh14yh,',4i M1`:4,h,',!hlrly!h141,!y yv!ryy,:!!VQI?!4'YPhi 4}h,,hh;h 4hyJ,hh.VQ' 1':1 JI''PI!r 1!•14' �11,+hVTiry,•yyhv WIN � [1 11'1111'J+,�ry,,' 1'yl+ll',, 'h r'Ij yl h y!r V1111i y yri,l, II+.I• 1 I'II � 1+!��1 W P � 1 11!I hh s aV a!Ih tY�l'IQ'y�i Ilh�yyl+!5 41,!!Iq 41,Iry hr!,4:;!I 11 W nd!i'�J!'4'yill!x'!i!1!i tR!'i1h'y �111 r'v�I;II'ah N4M1+1�}�!Iilglii!��h'jy�^� 4.1. !! ;.A yy v;I;ryvin yy y�,Nl'd•,h lyvhl' w'44nhhh,ylilh'hy,+l h''ilkv!'4 7iGl"vhr1, �� y,'ryL'v �, 1 v,r°hn,y'I ISM,,�4',: w1 A h. �h4,ht.�v i tv'h,},h v J ll hC' +IVv M1 111,!I 1h'hV+l^I,,,.'I I,.114 I I,h'I: qyl,h'},h'J 1 �v•'r ., y¢�h1i'h'4lin V4vvhl,y :I I 111 .k 1 111r ,I 1 1 M:4'• �4 '1 !;'1'9 i� 1,I: I•'' 1.�I I�,,144y11 M 1. I IV14, ,.Y 1 , 4v11 r 41�IY4411 rih.I :I'I yY4 1' �111 [[ jWi� 1, v 1Nu, 1y 1t111 vI1 , I. i `f!i' 'C �.'1!E„Eilii!Ii h 11 IVI 11v lyn I I h!'' I 'p('EE �JDtlpp,,p� i hl'I`Jlh v vtl l 1h,,l!wnY y4 6 y11 y4„v`d` .y vh r,,,I r W i, !1.'LJ I,I: li' e. �,:.11- j!17�� I4ry.1;1!!! ,, ,h rl �h v 1`r,1141�A:1, IYI,V uh'W'''1h'!!',V•: yv4^I� I�P'4'vilry} ,1: 1�P Q: :«I. I:i 1 V!'1'h+I4V4'lyll'IVI+4h�11h411 '1'!li'1"ly'1`yi�r,V4ry' Ilhl•11 ,V'h,�lly•!III�„411 :141i•r'h'I.' il''i!i!: `! 11 •� II!'L! �w+a ,�bqr;" C.II;i!; 7!+1�r1,,� r 1�Avb1, 'Vv;n'`'�'•,1h11 4111 ry1',,Ivy��t��4vhYvi'��,� ,M1 r'!h�� ;I'h4.4,h hl n:� !!i! A�! '.'I'1 i I{I 1 Nhljh!Ih1i 1ha1y,141h 9�'�;14,u'"1h X1°�!'!a�'^I^aldh!!1�9�,"dN' r1� !h y"w�'',lil''`y"�i; Pw�ll d I• i h;u q`;'h'I'�. I ! i .,1@ rr qp�'• I ! hh,,ylV 4;�4vp� I� vn�h";4hh,u4l vn l� v�wJy�i1 w �w b';n�l vhh.�,I,,1h. 'I' '�i�Nv W EI .I r, ��;,h ,I y!I, h. �I, 114� J✓'I'h!hY1 ..D..!!!r,::,...:�:.�.::.. .1.: 1.:�. 1 I,h� v 1 I `11' 1'y7;'h• !r 19 r�4,+I4 ",u,1. hw, ,I 1 :Ih4 ,QI rry f Ah4 4 •il''N''4 Y 4 1 9 yhi li''1,.,I N y'�•1+, '11'.I ..a.........�..... 1,: c ..� ��i'' ly 1, Iy h!• h I '!4 II y+ E +'I'wh 1 '!h4 ,1 ! rNll,h 4!!h''!VV 1,1�rr11�I1� hl �M1 ,'vl�'i9 14• �1 •'`I y r h, y +7'1h 1 1 u' S 1 1�h. yyM���1I I :v� .I I�1 1 11 1 1 1 ! 1 1 11 1 IJr� �1 I. 1�1„h�4�i'hh,.: ....!...�e,nf.............Ii.........::{`•:.e;I; !'1 M!!II�:1114v:1 qq �[r�e- 'w �,i1 'vhr `h `v i'1 ,�,,•1,�R.I.i.:. ;Rf k 5 C 4 �•h''h v4' h'I 1',,�IrTI'' 1h�ry'` h ::li::::i:::::„ 4�-�I'1 I. ir' l'.I''!'v''hw hIII �,iM1' �,I v l'W.,ry:JI w,l awl�h k • I {y�'� !I�- !!1 1 ��, 9.I .I 4rY`.I M: R .Iw•9 P1. 1�" �41.I •q•`,411 14�rryh. s:l:::::�. '.�..::.#.....j....:.)::: ,�h 1'� n,I 'w 11rR11 1h.1 �yI'1IIIf��'�I1'���III1�1IIINIIIIIIIIIIFtyI . a:E': 'IIt IppG; h'I 1 14:14 1 r v q,''':I h v 1 ..�.' ,'•4''"� -.� n 4v' v��4'111 ;14v '1111h.1t'1„1, vh -4 4vh'�+i 111t1,t4 'h ii t ii 1f[(! y, 9 M 4`Awv'h•!' .j... I 1 h"P lQP. 9V 1!41.I1,1 I'.I .1 `d 1 q,,ry,h n hdv'^I•JI 'h'' !IhAI!.� J14 vh1 ,1 1.1 ,nl,ih 'L'lil Iw 'r•I 1 i I'':I:,I�I!II' .,I n'lyh.!Nw';1 Nlry ,4,y.•"1 ,1��.�u 1 ,°;ha'�+�'n Y !N',Y1�t I.. ::�I.. ���I..k�1111 �I I�i.::: I:I:: ,ti"h"hp,,.y,,,A>�,',Y,: hhhry y'"''+�';,+19 Ivy, I•h•' vhh vrh '�:.:...... ..�I:J.::.�.::�:i:. ..�..... ,i'S: 'I:f '!11 !11;!h'4` � N r.�l l 11 y•nI ..�. �...........::. ... �14��.. 'n4d!I I w1 �4 h IF I'kC'1;,i'11 d',1• Ir e• N, :!:.d.:.::1:..... ::�:.r.. ..�.::1..�.........f..�..:I7.....�:I:II.I.,7.1.1.1...... IYhy`h 1191 III +'v II : 11 is ! I. b y '"h A•1'4 V!I!!'4 { t # 7 h y V' J I� Y ih,IE `i I i II`h `hh•hr1r,',' 'f13 t I x ,Ir4 I .,,: .' a ili'! I•1II',h Ih�: 19 44 I 1 ha ., I,1I ' :I h4.: r ! nI h� h+ 3.Y l 4 r 7,I 'r"'4'hJ,I!1"h'•hi•III .,I r, 1V 141` 111 r�4 ti"'M��11 •yl v4 V .I' I�y !1h4y9.I { 11 Ti V ul i ! !4r P yy II I!I ,Vh rrl ,11 rl',I ,1114 .I tt �1M1.PE �:L!ili 'I VI I�1 'h'1"1,11 IIw14h P.r p I lil+ .I. I 1 11 11 11 v!> iF•:I PPS 4 1 IJ I ,1 11 I 1 M1 .I 1 w ,h1h,1�h , 1..,1•h 14 .A 4.P�t, 4a 1144 : Irlh�'91 "Ili'I'9 1111Y•„'19 33 f �,f�yf•1441141 �1111� rl 1 � �11�.1,1 �' �::.J::.....:n:::a .I'=: 'd° ,9II 11111 11�1 n'v 11h 11 1 �1 1�11.1 1 k by 4• � 1111 4 rl 411.I .I. .I' �`�1.`1�p y 1 "1 IN1 k - ,I.o-::.•.«_... iq 1 ht 1 1.I�:N r 1� �11�� y.,1 h111t1 h'41`r.' 114v1"1 YV,II :4':I 1M1�'11 J411 VI VI'1 I��h:h'1 h,r. € I 1a'y'IM'•'`'41, I,Ih. I,1 I':h,I1,1 ,, t ,ha'',a 1 M � l+"111h 11 41r14' 1'1n 4114 �I'�•'1� 1 1 jj !'+In,1 r,l 1 ,1 �1,I1,•111 91�61,h r1,: ''�� �L... IE..!.:€i....ji' 'IIIi�E ":h' 111M14'.•i'!M`1 4v14v' ,1, II q :t I PI 1 1 `l y'' � hl Y f 1 1 N•1y V n t 1 !.... E..�..,....:.....i.f.........1....r..r r..LE..E.1......� .. Li..l... '! !. ::111. I.1L� I1�: ::I' 11`•1•Ih �i I II 4 �"'h'V4 y'iw 141 41 4 1h. 41 1 �1 1 Iv 1.I! I I '4 h9 Irl r14'4 y'I'h 1 141�I �4I� I I'v�I I�Iv rl h 4'Y a1 R'hY 111 yDlny' hnllli ,II,Ii Ihr !i 1 I W �k iIl€i iilil i L�iE'!' 11 I 1' 1,1 ' �r;l! •t I `I::e::::!:: :i�i:! y::......fa..a........E...a,.........,.hn.....,.. ..L..l.l.....L,.. I'i_,6.,'!h' � I 4I1 r144 I .fill:" .;•,, r ,q'11 1 V`11 4�11• I I .I:Ih Aly,1 is IfF.L..:...........................L...�..:....�::.:::::..........L.....:.rF:`::::::is[':................... 1 I .I4.Y I- I :I:I:n:::!:::::.:.:.: ...11..L.Ca....l....,..,.L:.f}i.!...L...a.la.la...Ea.!...IJ.i........1....i......I......I.... 1 F �f�pl € !! 11h 1 4vlh y] 1v 1r�.1I�1:,,•1•�) i ��I... i�. .iE J'44 yryw_yy 1.1 ................ ...... ............. .......... .............................. ................. .Y v 11: r`' ._ 'fll 111�41„II y 'xr. ,4 y �h4',4hvinv 14v, :n:E�::::::::::... ..�... ..�.......... ....LC..,..........LC.......: rl ' 1 �J 1'1 ' 14 11 I'I W 'y'I`I:1 u°.a�aa m�,r r„1� I, '',r ,r1 n .nIIII+a'�,lih'h;�P';r'v'Lv hi':+I li',r4i'1;t'y ih':,1!h'1,n. ,,(I h! 1h li 14 - 5 V yh'1�,4 hhly 1 . „n q I,yl 'IVM7!!h h.1h'1`1,�.4 h • II Y1 V,,,!I h hh 11.•^plivhll V I hu hl��!I plh y!ry'4`,pl �i�11!I 11}h li i'd4'�hn'1'4I yl'I•h Y'h vh'11h'7h'd414•!r14 9 vh'li,ry 4`ti ,:;b 1!r !r'; ��'1dy4v;h'+vl,l4,�t1';4i!I'h'h'"!;;ryP'ir!ihi'!!f 1r1�!IP,pl"1 '�n ,�I E''P'�PII�II!'I'�PIIEI '�PPPE I II I,1Iry��!.11 1i lh1 4N ,,A ,h h !I I r P'}hn'hl� �.;hV it w.�,hr hn'hh1,!! '!Il h� � WWflWN' WWWIW' H� II'•I�i'';Ifry.+.�:J1,�l;lr lY II I;11Vh41v'hV';,!!IPr'Iti'Ni!!'t d'!,ryl''ir,h''i;'y41Ni''' 11!+'lv v; '!t'.. o�,I'!;II+ Bpi h!!Ih!?,hhnhl il'lll �"'lil!"'�lii'i;y.!,i.l•v gilA I�!!i,y q!,hJay huvryl:,h,J1'''1I,1,h h,,yh,,h 1,yl ,,I�1„ 1',hl iTTi"IDP'PSh''I"IhI lvhNv4 ':�?I h,,4r,,hh yh: iij71iui1hyl�':ihlN!�: ..1'11 vy7T 4Y. n144'!Iw',h vhh4y+,l 4yh r44-:' °'.y,I,y l,h 1,4sr ,h 44i,Jlhn,,!I h,yJl'.!ij i+',!:4v 1;,h1A,k41d'y!, h,',li dryfll''J,!'li!!Iry�4ryyhthh,!I,y!rlll,7.lNllh,y!,1 yy!I,ly''!111'h,y'. � '.'t y11;V:�ry4!'ly!A y4 , 1!11'!!!+I y1!4,h'v''!h'y 1!I, '!II 9� I h 1!' aY I •i1+'I•h'r'I'�;"I'ha .1{h!';1'IYI,,n�,,11,'I;II'iY!h h!v!711 y1!II l:iy;lh!h;'i' i ,,�,,�r�':i n'I�dpp'lid l'�: 1�. n„!I r1a14�V 1'1•V1'yr1!I 1,gg;:;' 'y'hd; V I 1 �h11 1II w1 r!1+�hh JLhv4h,II . i, vlhl,h ,rh; ,11�t�w� �I 1!1 Vh•, ,,,h,'I;4, ®:rhl4 .I�Ivlih'1`�Iv�: I111 1',h+yll I'vl4 r 41111'I•,h h'I.NN,, yl,y',hhl!G 411 h v1111 vlly+! 114 .4°'tl llw v!,M1r141 v+4+14j`!ygh 4..1•,:�' `'!1 h '!41 '�::h v4,k:t vry:!' " ;;n4 , wl h vqw v4,6,I,h•,!4+:I,',«Ib`T r,!14;!r 4;,h,��ytyy:PiP! ;:h'> •1h,1 1 E 1,Ip 1 n h•!11 y IP;yy y 'li iM1l H'1 �Iuvlvtuv.vlyR hr'�I -?�J711 1 14'I'u44!;lill hl'I 1 yl1 I4 r I h '!II^�I v:Vy!,I, , °•II111111id�1''!1 1,h+ r`!) 9�pI��I����������I��rp�, I��������IIF1't,II II!!,'I','I nyilll'11'!:�4 NI'y;dh'•Itl!,II^Cr'+„ -l4.'VG m'Milry!4''Jv 41I' '''Ih'IJdI'!hi}!!lid;+!Ui""E"i"''';+I" ,pP'!4yi': �JII+�4vi',4,,"^IIW'r vy:y,ljr+Mlf!,1'i`+ I'r 4111111111 Illtilllllllll Ili hhllr,!A;,p 1h� n Nbell,V I I..I I,u'1• 'd 1 1 , 1 .�' "1'!d ya' ,+I n:1 1, r +" '3.,., av'R�L"nta,^.�c.a'"u:.uh.. II''' II1' 111111 P111111 I M '1 I11 I1 1 '•r'I'V''19v1h44'�1''l+14"'h 4J IVI :?:. '"Jg�r�..... 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 n l "w r 1 1 I 11 1 I ^, ... 1.,.• r,......:: �.�...:..1............ ... J �i'uw'h. �.n,l'� '�Ih,11, •.I 1�hr r1111 ...11.1.. ....... i..!. :i,'Y'. ir: .�a.,h,h1'hY!li;l'hl;',1, � „yh+•'k14ly,v!y4'Ju!vhil','!!� �;Ih,'y4!li4hp' 14l4vih!C��11'hNlll y;'!I 4F..h hNiJ4!I!li!h�.°II17!"1i!!!;i+1i'!I'i11i'!!li lih!ii'i!!h'Ytil!!il+iyJ!il!ti!lllil7l?gli}lylil'�I!N;h�PmPgyl''�NI!ti!Iihl:iihJ!!li'iryy!VP!I,II!iPul;A � a s:.. a� a•' 1• Pihi'I,!h'Ilil+iPl!Ilii''�I'il'h$!h'1',hild;!1!h'y!!+il•P!i'J;i;lid;!li';I,hlh i'�lil!h!'4�plP+li':r'�!!q'i'ii'1'hh'111j11i;!'"II':11 f' I ! hhh^h''!!',!PIP!•J!alhli'r!!!lil':IJ!;i;il!!hJ'IIh2;I+1J;ilyiip6yl pIII!iiJ!Ilh�I I!il(:�i1'I'!!I4,,:h;ll!h1'.',h,: .I! 11 V'Irl,I r v'1'I 1 I y+ 1'4'd''h''114''I4,vy,,v',h vhlvbihvu,l lh„1,,,h,11,11111 y4+1! "... ::N:!n is ias:;u` 1mhF!Eit?;:5E':i-i!DI!tWf?s.F!un r:aa!a;°I:i Fi Fl:a , :':anr vy cr'sl, h1L4'Ly,h uI1„1 h,,,h !hl„`ryhl,lll Lu , - n,ml i',i!lihl�'yliil;i!!i'il;ill!1J1'hi�Ii, ' JNU' I °�� vJ 1'i�h it 1 i q i'l ,II I,'Jgiii;!'irya'14t+I 'lllll I''I��II1IIItIII'III'�IIIf'II''IIIfII1IIIIIIID1IIIIIII�IIIIIIIIFIIIIIIIIryII'I�1II�IIIIf� . �!!!!I I���DDFI DWIWWWH��1'1 Il lv�' !4'JN i EElliillE' ylI!JIIA,•'II''�J'!h'I''1 I'I,l!! "hi1!Ilill 1n! IhWUWf !'l+II1�j�4:111,�", I `, II it - - idyl, i.. ',w' ���I,11111,��•. ; I P! P 1 I 1E i, ' I E I E ' h1• o G'C - '�b �`�::., t 1f��u: � ! � I(I � �� I! ! �..• 1,1 11,r Inv Y. P:P9 W J1 fEi - tl. i P Iffff,, i C�h 5�. .P".- u I !. _ I i t I I ' I is I 'I f II I � I 0 tl I G U I I I E E r G tl� I9 'il III 'f 'Y�d �'li `i`ii' 4•I I l I'• LI I PPab C cD 1 _v1;'.'!flit .I E Ilj!I Illl�llli€€€t1! I I.I.! °I G cG CC PCUI G my I:! I - 1 pp G H I I 9Q :: I...�•:1 ....:..-.: I , v .. ° ;.^...:: Il 1 I 4 QO II9 �EI. �! 'ppf i :! n4u d0!!shc PN Vgr n� . . ..:9.:- !:II f !(I I E i ••i�.r E r 'I ' I t° :i I dd:: ! :Er ! I' 1'' jCi I IE I I..:I I 1: �. r'E •Ir:1 li'I f fr'!t !11 E111 IE! Itll` I! if lr t I G .:G GGG I::.{flf..i ! I Illdklh�llll��el'Ih'14yh II;h!II'i!l!!1"N;vll''I;l!+141y lllhliillllhllllljlilllllllliE III!I!gj!h�E�ll!I I - - ••- •.- - �GGGGGGGGGGGGGGCCG It is likely that the use of separation_fabrics m.the�road_way may be desirable and it is a near certainty that purnpin-g--of groundwater will'kbe-necessary in-orderzto�de_water-utility trenches=dur-in-g�construction:4 This development will utilize the City of Bozeman's central water and sewer systems and will not degrade the local groundwater. To ensure a high=qual-ity--road=base;street construction will be completed,,by=removi=rig=over-burden,to the depth necessary to expose the underlying gravel. C. Geology - Soils - Slopes Geologic Hazards There are no known geologic hazards associated with this site other than its inclusion within SeismicrZone 3?- Protective Measures No special protective measures are proposed for the site. It is subject to the sarne Seismic Zone 3 construction standards as is the entire Bozeman area. Unusual Features • There are no known unusual features or slope instabilities at this site. The soils are moderately expansive requiring the same standard of care when constructing roads, utilities, and houses as practiced throughout the greater Bozeman area where similar soil or high groundwater conditions are encountered. Soils and Soils Map Soils information provided by the NRCS indicates that two different soil types are found within the project boundaries (Figure 5). Soils Table NRCS Soils Data, Baxter Creek Business Park Soil Type Approximate Acres on Slope Depth to Water Site Table 510B - Meadowcreek Loam 5.5 <2% 1.0 - 3.5 ft 537A - Lamoose Silt Loam 12.0 <2% 1.0 - 3.5 ft The Lamoose soil is found primarily along the alignment of Baxter Creek while the • Meadowcreek soils are on the higher portions of the site which are currently cultivated for grain crops. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 4 I I I I \ 1 I I ■■ ■■ ■so an a ■ _ ■ somas 0 ■ •■ ■■ ■■ u `�1, ■� �� ■IIL•'■ ■� �IIIID i ME 0 No Olson r WE p=1-1 f-1�-I MON. ' • of 0 6 •• ee a ,. :. - SubdhAsio EMM q�Haa a \\��. \\ •� ,, "MINION ,mUi o \\�• � � � .��;����������\.°. �.. ) , e a i> - ..�: �\�; .. m:�C' P. �E,�3�GAcJSr <a`.� \ ` \- \.� '33 �..:: Q,9a9.:°aa„�d.-GG.,'.=&l3�9RGiS. � aA.:ki SaoaGGS:ISQi9au3:J:19917S1S•'�GgI9Nkl-Yic:UN:YSF..lzseaFa�S5cy S1a.5::SJa6`xCln.:�lo • f g : a is `�•�ICGa\v-a.a� - . . .. ... .--�� 6G '� .�usG �*`1GCnS1 S, '•�5"" Q al ^. -�GRF`:. RSSQ � `c`S�C9SPv� GC�yP v6F5P9�r pGy Gt�"O�C G?.>13h��'.:.�:..P.:�., inns 0 IN o :.::m , ea •e a ,• p.' \`t��\ti I _ I I ' ' ••• �66��L������������ `G:a_usa�e,�'�.Gcsn�r� �c��G��� a• �- • Both of these soil types are generally deep, in excess of 5 feet, and grade into gravel at depths from 2 to 6 feet. Near Baxter Creek the soil tends to be shallower and grade to gravel sooner. These soil types offer,limitati-ons=to-urban-development=based-primarily on-depths tog water dan soil st erngth,, Simple:engineering techniques-and__ construction=pr-actices_haye_been empl_oy_ed-successfully:in'-the Beman_area to deal with these-eomm'on==soil=conditions. O.n_site_tes pits_indicate_gravel-depths from-1,.5_to=3=feet The gravels provide good foundation material for future road and building construction. Hydric inclusions, a wetlands indicator, can be found in both soil types. This item is discussed further in the vegetation section. Cuts and Fills The extension of Competition Drive across Baxter Creek and the connection off Competition Drive to Huffne Lane will require_fi-1-L-of-approximatel-y=three feet The construction contract shall provide for the shaping, s_eeding"arid'fe_r_tilizati_on_of:ali frlh slopes. M-axi-mum fl-l-slopes=will=be=threefeet=horizontal=run=to-onefoot`vertical run over-= Bax er C==reek and_six=feet_horizontal-run-t_�orrefoot=vertical-run=at_the=connection-toy Huffine Lane. The Stormwater Master Plan, which will be submitted to MDEQ, details alkerosi-on-control measures to be installed by the contractor. These measures will • incl-ude placing=siiafence--and=straw balebarr-iers_in--those locations disturbed by construction which may cause sediment to enter a waterway. In addition, t rnporary, stor-rnwater�retention/detention-ponds will be constructed as necessary (Figure 6). The following section summarizes the stormwater issues addressed in the Engineering Design Report which will be submitted to the Planning Department. Stormwater Mana t--) Stormwater runoff will be deta ni a and treated in structures constructed o en ach-loc The natural topography of the area along with curb and gutter, storm drains with inlets, drainage swales and an appropriately designed site plan will direct stormwater to the detention facilities on each lot. Stormwater structures will be sized using the preliminary lot layout as a guide and "Rainfall Intensity - Duration Curves" for a 10 year storm event developed for the City of Bozeman. Stormwater runoff will include runoff from each lot, from Competition Drive and for lots #1 and 42, the 50 foot wide open space corridor along Huffine Lane. Stormwater runoff from each lot will be directed no hwesterly_to-a-detention=po'nd with release structure. The opening in the release structure will release flow equivalent to the pre-developed • runoff rate. i I I Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 5 o-_ �- 1 EXISTING s4'cMa rn B®-�j#z m j I_ I +oo 04 I ( � I 1 / LOT #8 ; ) I I �If LOT #7 i � e� � � c �� I V T 1 O POND 21'z21'x1.5 DISCHARC Dom,,--- I I SIDE SLOPES1 i .ram LOT #1 DETE ON POND ,� ,1t 1 ` DETENTION POND 8'x350'x1.5 O DI HARGE END O ro � 21'x21' O SIDE SLOPES 2:1 x1.5' DISCHARO ,�G� 2:1 I oho 28 LF 12' RCP 1 / SLOPE-1 � I i I IPPW y I --. �..... 22B-L3 T1 RCP -- -- --- r,��" 4 171 +, — I SLOPE=2.57G 13 L 12' RCP \� + SLOP -2_sx - - ...._.__. __.._...__._ __._—.._.—_._....... L.- ------- ........ - 120 LF i RCP ' ` j _ ---- ---- '---- -- —'--..__ 1 ' ETENTION PONDI x23'xl.s' O,dISCHARGE END ! / LOT #4 I ' IDE SLOPES 7 ` f , LOTS ' I I 1 �, I i l Q LOT #3 � 1 1 LOT W LOT #6 z (If LLI II I I ON POND ( ' �— I I RELEASE STRUCTUR 'I S Y W DETENTION ! N POND / i Q I I 20'x20'x1.5' O DISCHARGE END 1 ( \ ETENTION POND ( i ( DETENTION POND. I '` W O SIDE SLOPES 2:1 �� I m 20'x20'x1.5' O DISCHARGE END f sl SLOPES 2:��" GE ° C m ` 1 t 8x70z1.5 O DI FIARGE END I I SIDF�SLOPES 2:1 J I SIDE SLOPES 2:, i - � . 1 I CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE`SWAI.E �� . 15'RC CULVERT r/PETS � 'I� l m SLOPE 1.5x EE DETAIL THIS SHEET\ T �NFORCE DRAINAGE SWALE � \l La/l CY RIPRAP -- I � �1 F--2.3' GRAPHIC SCALE MATERIAL PROJECT N0. o a o m xn N FROM SWALE ON J// 1.5' 77 n EXCAVATION W SHEET NUMBER - (Dr/IIT) A—_ OF SWALE) i L mon- 50 It DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL ORAw1"°NUMBER (PRIOR 70 REDUCTION) FIG . Table 5.0 Stormwater Detention Ponds Pond # Lot Detention Pond Size Release Rate 1 Lot#1 2,801 sf 1.12 cfs 2 Lot#2 562 sf 0.45 cfs 3 Lot#3 566 sf 0.45 cfs 4 Lot#4 389 sf 0.33 cfs 5 Lot#5 415 sf 0.35 cfs 6 Lot#6 528 sf 0.41 cfs 7 Lot#7 419 sf 0.33 cfs 8 Lot#8 435 sf 0.36 cfs 9 Storm Drain 1,243 sf 0.70 cfs Inlet Discharge from ponds 1, 7, 8 and 9 will enter Baxter Creek after treatment while • discharge from ponds 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 will enter a drainage swale to be constructed along the west property boundary and discharging into Baxter Creek at the north boundary of the project. Modifications to pond dimensions will be made as each lot is developed and the exact parking lot and building dimensions are determined. Calculations and inlet detail drawings are contained in the Appendix of this report. B°axter�Creeeek designated ds a stream/ditch combination o"n the City of Bozeman's Area Stream Map, has been realigned in recent years. Presently, it begins=at-Far eer---slCanal-v near Cotton--wood-Road just=rrorthiof Huff ne-L-a`ne ('Highway 191). The alignment is detailed in Figure#10 "City of Bozeman Area Stream Map". TheQstrearrvditch drains, approximately 1'00 acres---or-e-enter--ing t=heBaxter=Creek Business=Park=s'ite through a —54"-CMP culvert. The new culvert proposed for Baxter Creek under Competition Drive will be a 48"-RCP=culver0 A-3-1-0-Pennit Application-has-been-submitted-and-appr-oved-I The existing 54" CMP crossing Huffine Lane (Highway 191) has the capacity to flow 151 cfs under full flow conditions. The proposed 48" RCP has the capacity to flow 200 cfs, approximately 46 cfs more than the maximum flow predicted to enter the site from south of Huffine and the predicted stonmwater runoff within the site. Calculation worksheets for the 54" and 48" RCP culverts and a copy of the approved 310 Permit are in the Appendix of this report. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 6 • Slopes The project site slopes at approximately one and one half% from southeast to northwest as indicated by the topo lines on the preliminary plat. The Baxter Creek channel, which is incised into the terrain approximately 3 feet, represents the only topographic feature on site. D. Vegetation pproximatel_y�1_aeres;or-63%-ofth-e=site;within the Baxter Creek Business Park are currently cultivated-for-grain_crops.,The_rema-in-i-ng 6.5-ae-r-q, primarily in the northeastern portion of the site, iswegetated_-by_a_var-iety--of gr-asses=and-forbes FTistoricaIly;this area was used-for pasture,-but-iscurr-entl-y-vacant: Approximately-3 6� adr-es=of w`eflands hav bee en iden-tfied_on the property,the largest being within the grass- forbe community adjacent to Baxter Creek. Wetland vegetation identified in the wetlands delineation prepared by Wetlands West, Inc., includes wild-celery, duck weed, sedges and short-awn foxtail.. The=wetlands-were-determ-ined-to-be-artificial,-_that is,-irr-i.gation- induced, None of the wetlands identified in the delineation are of high value. Wetlands In compliance with the Federal_Clean Water-Act-�and-the Gallatm_Valley_Subdiv_ision Re.gu ations wa etland delineation was conducted in April 1998. Vegetation, soil;and hydrology data gathered at six soil pits indicated the presence of three wetland communities. These three wetlands comprise.=37,57-acres-or=209/6^of the total project acreage. The following summary taken from the delineation by Wetlands .West, Inc. describes the location and type of wetlands found within the project boundaries. A full copy of the wetlands delineation has been provided to the Bozeman City-County Planning Department. A copy of the wetlands delineation map is included herein. Note: The delineation was done for a slightly larger parcel than the current Baxter Creek PUD site. As a result, the acreages in the delineation do not match exactly with the application. Wetlands summary by Wetlands West,Inc. Riverine Wetland (W-1) : The riverine wetland includes the Billion sub-drain outlet ditch and Baxter Creek. Baxter Creek enters the property at the southeast boundary and exits at the center of the northern boundary. The Billion sub-drain ditch enters the property toward the north-eastern boundary and joins Baxter Creek where the creek exits the property. The riverine wetland, including channels and associated emergent wetlands, comprises 0.29 acres or 8% of the project wetlands. This wetlands type, represented by the creek and ditch channel, is classified as a riverine system, upper perennial (cobble • bottom and `high' velocity), unconsolidated bottom (cobble-gravel) and aquatic bed, and Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 7 • • • permanently flooded (Cowardin et al. 1979). Dominant plant species include wild-celery (Vallisneria americana, OBL) and duck weed (Lemna spp., OBL). The marsh areas associated with and adjacent to Baxter Creek are classified as palustrine, persistent emergent, and are permanently to seasonally flooded, or saturated (Cowardin et al. 1979). Dominant hydric plant species include Nebraska and beaked sedge (Caren nebraskensis and C. rostrata, OBL), cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL), and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW). Nebraska and Beaked Sedge Wet Meadow Complex (W-2) The marsh complex represents 83% of the wetlands on the property (2.97 acres). The wetland extends from the west side of Baxter Creek up-gradient and west toward the edge of the plowed field, where the gradient levels. The dominant vegetation is Nebraska and beaked sedge, timothy (Phleum pratense, FACU), thistle (Circium undulatum, FACU+), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis, FACU+). The hydrology is supported by Baxter Creek, and surface and ground water from the plowed area. This wetland is classified.as palustrine, emergent wetland, persistent, and saturated to seasonally flooded (Cowardin 1979). Nebraska Sedge Meadow (W-3) : This wet meadow is considerably drier than W-2 and is located in the northwest corner of the property. It is the smallest wetland on the project, representing 2% of the total wetland acreage (0.06 acre). The dominant vegetation is Nebraska sedge, and Kentucky bluegrass. The source of hydrology is likely • a seepage from a small trench on the west side of the property boundary and immediately adjacent to the west side of W-3. The hydrology is from water that flows from a culvert located at the southeast corner of the property, which crosses beneath U.S. Highway 191. The water for this trench appears to be supplied from a spring across the highway to the south. This wetland is classified s palustrine, emergent wetland, persistent, and temporarily flooded. (Cowardin 1979). Sedge Marsh and Associated Ditch (W-4) : This small wetland, which is located outside the current project boundary, is adjacent to U.S. 191 and represents 8%of the total wetland acreage (0.29 acres). Water pools immediately after exiting the culvert, then flows north through a narrow, shallow trench along the western property boundary. The hydrology arises from a seep on the south side of U.S. 191. The vegetation was represented by several wetland species, including beaked sedge (Carex rostrata, OBL), duckweed (Lemna spp., OBL),pondweed (Potamogeton spp., OBL), speedwell (Veronica spp., OBL), and short-awn foxtail (Alopecurus aequalis, OBL). The wetland is classified as palustrine, persistent emergent, permanently to seasonally flooded (Cowardin et al. 1979). There are no trees or shrubs within the project site. Control of weeds on the site will be addressed by a Weed Management Plan. An application for establishment of a weed management plan has been submitted to the County Weed Supervisor. A copy of the application is included in the Appendix. i Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 8 WETLAND DELINEATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY m p 9 51€ � OF m 14,1 a �^ BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK - PUD �i~ 6Y2i�� _ 7�g�� ,•;(ASP.FUL GRAPHIC SCALE Ioru, rEsr-:om Nw § d BOZEMAN,MONTANA A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4,SECTION 9,T.2 S.,R.,S E.,P.M.M. ; U M' H b� I m.°. ao ti i I wcnwos wmc uvu�rTc er g T Cltt OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA ``y 3 b$ p To RComno.) x y• OWNERS: GARDINER GREEN,JR. MONTANA RANCH PROPERTIES,INC. TRIPLE THREE.LLC I 303 WINTERGREEN LANE �'x� BOZEMAN, MT 59715 Y ( i it -4 cxP tPT 1�°yon d Jytoo_.- - :�f, +/+ i?;f j}•`, . IP \ r roxo 1 1 I smrw roam �..r:'�".� "``��----.._ � .//{!•I'.�• � ,.�.. tt fl I g�{ y °ptOp�•)� t oaxma ,� � `� { �,(' :^-- —f_ "y�'�r%'� �,.' C• �::r,.:-�:_.±=% i` �f I'; -i•, l tl _.- �,_ � P Ir.II; __ -;� ! \ :,1/ ,�'^ �-P'�¢� - �b� 4ite.,• ,r;y� � �_ °/'�� i;�,:..''� � t,,I, an¢r v.. •\ � - ,I �`- r ��,. .1.. t ,'a.w= � yy I� .®..�m N:�L_._. `'��---•—^+ °-•_---\ --._...___- ,...- .�`� ^z ,�jaH� x'n«�� raa,. � ?fi:,;'':?;; � LEGEND O X m�m,Im rux - I {'I t .'... �. �r k �.�- # r�a R•�i,yam p I ,i' it '`, � •`� \ q" {n ,•-� xn,wm R�R�I� �B ; 0.'>; E �..� Y �. t � �� K "`.c �jlg�$ 'a f� yS f.'.x �` /' (•' ! � 1 I y.:, .%/• m rmm nx � I I�yl. I `F.w �• i� � 'f � i � �"`R ,� ; f % 14 'i i �IH%�.. 7% oosro+c mm xroRxxl �y Q If W CL •y;s`i � ;x r .-.�, i I � y I I 'I D �S 4 3 0 `�'.I� z.-_ s tui � �$Iy� 1 �d'7" .; � nrr.yi/ �� ,�.s;' ! � 1 ( it •�� i ; t°I�{ m omnxc scum uumac '�t, ...__�' �,• r" o I '� ,., ) \ �\ 1�t i� I f:`k ;; `�4 per.,C 'a i t I I i' i I ! ` ! '� i !i;.:;•, In W(n cn P+ o 1 1 �! ozcsa N�40'07•C 1224.e1*: `\ /� ! )) i(:•l.''' P T NO. 1'f i_+- -\ `'•\ '~. 3I3o.wI.mo.0310 sift SHEET NUMBER+MB • E. Wildlife Owing to past agricultural usage and-dack:of habitat diver-sity_ (no trees or shrubs), the site provides limited wildlife habitat. Portions of the proposed development, mainly along Baxter Creek, are home to various sspec:ies--of birdsiand:smail:mammals. This area will be retained as part of the Baxter Creek riparian corridor. The stream will be returned to a meandering course to increase its habitat value. There are no known endangered or threatened species endemic to the site. F. Historical Features There are no=structures--on-,site nor is-theis-ite=w thin-a=historicdrstrict. A letter—was-sent-to,., the=State-Preservation=off ce--requesting;a-revie_wtof the.-cultural-resource record for this area. Therelwer..e,no records-of historic--or cultural sites within the property. Connie Constan, Cultural Records Intern, indicated `that with=the-amount,of develo-pmentTalread_y, =o-ccurringrinAe_project_area,�there-is=a-lo_w�likeliho-od-of impact=on--cultural-properties'=� A letter from the State Historical Preservation Office is in the Appendix. G. Visual Impacts • The Baxter Creek Business Park is within the Highway 191 entryway corridor. Because of this, it is subjected to added scrutiny for visual impact. In general, the site plan and Development Guidelines minim-i-2Ft eterid-ency of-commercialide_velopment tosreate a-� s7oYd=wallyof strip--development-,par-allel=to-the'str et-frontagc�, The proposed C mo peti ion DTi-v-F reaks-theview-into-the-site:and will create-tr-ee-li-ned-str-eetscape=across=theme, property. The,proposed--Baxter:.C-reek=streamrcorridor-,,in combination=with=the=Bi-Ilion„ Auto Plaza open space, creates=anothe-r=vi-sualreonidor extending to the northwest across the project site from Huffine Lane. Visual impacts are addressed in additional detail in the PUD application. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 9 • COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT A. Water Supply Water demand estimates for the Baxter Creek project are based on the City of Bozeman's draft Wastewater-Facility Plan-and-draft W-atei Facility Plan? Designed water main size will be based on peak hour demand and required fire flow. The design-report-foi-the over-a1=l-water-system=for the-V-alley-West annexation, which includes the Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D, was completed in March 1998 and provided to the city of Bozeman's engineering staff. This design report, along with the city of Bozeman's draft Water Facility Plan was the basis for the final design documents for the Valley West water system improvements project. The water system distribution line for the Valley West annexation was installed in 1998. The Baxter Creek project will have an estimated average day water demand of 65 gallons per minute and peak hour demand with required fire flow of 1,709 gallons per minute. Information from a hydraulic analysis of the proposed Baxter Creek water system is used r to determine water main size. An eight inch ductile iron water main will provide adequate flows at the required pressures. • Design of the system will be in compliance with Montana Public Works Standard Specifications with City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications , 4`h Edition. "-T-�loop the--proposed=syster-n conn`e�c ion-to-tti C-ity-of Bozeman's=water--nairi=system is proposed-at t-locations? The first would be at=the=newl-y=constructed Val=ley W.-est water main-extensionilin-C-.ottonwood_Roa—d;approximately 300 feet north of Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The=second-connection would=be to=the=existing=water-maiii�in /� Competition_D-r-i=ve-afprivate water=mai-n_within_the_J C'Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision. Connection=to�th we ater main-with=the J:C=B-i:ll-ion Auto Plaza Subdivision is depende_nt__,, upon_the_Gity_of-Bozeman--accepting_ownership-of-this--pr-i-vate-system.=I-f_the system is cnot accepted=by the City of Bozeman, an,7alter-mate=connection-r-outeis-avalable. This connection to the City's system would require extension=o=f_a=wate mr am part way=along the eastemn propertyboundary to the on rth propertyboundary,then east=to=Co-ttonwood Road and the.new Valley West main. All�.waterline-construction willb-e_paid=for-zby-the=Applicant:Proposed water and sewer improvements and streets are shown on the following reduced scale Preliminary Plat. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 10 • 0 • I • PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR: BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OWNERS: GARDNER GREEN, JR. - PURPOSE: CREATE 8 BUSINESS LOTS AND TO CREATE MONTANA RANCH PROPERTIES, INC. A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T2S, R5E, P.M.M. BAXTER CREEK CORRIDOR/OPEN SPACE TRIPLE THREE, LLC 1805 WEST DICKERSON g1 CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA BOZEMAN. MT 59715 dt • �--T'L �-' —�/ /— 6 — ------------L—_ _ - i--'��^�"'_.` `_ �' III —.5-8 t r P.0.6. SOUTH 1/16 C(Xu4m OF THE SFLRION 9` ti „! 2.1 �. -L'OT 7 1 l SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF p i e / FOUND 4-MDT AWMNUM43.699 1l ' l 1.05 on LOT 6 R v,OPEN S¢ACCr Y �*D 2r),Ui:q:ri. f % R 53.338 ft 1.22 us°fi Er—:arSe�r _ ,� \ LEGEND EL-480:2V lJ I • SET 1 1/4-YPC MK'D MORRISON MAIERLE, INC / sesoam•E1s°.s `•:1" '�•�tx'a -, o FOUND YPC MK'D GASTON ENC. , FOUND 5/8"REBAR 0 FOUND 2"MDT ALUMINUM CAP MK'D 195+00 9 ER Cl PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE gW.032�eq.ft`- !,, ! ORRIDOR >2.1 :51,51 sa.lL 1 Rlu EL=48D6 .`\ _ (' A S,% 1.18 ac. - IXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE '0.83 c. OPEN SPACFI i_� `76sN a.n�:'i 2 i EXISTING TREE _ \ i ' PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE ^x(I ) r(l I(� I '�� PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET UNE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA 9jl �.•�� I '�\•'•, :- � 'J �f FIRE HYDRANT Ll N00'4007E 55.70' CI 175.00' 35.96' 117'S" - I f LOT p' I`��\ ��••`�.__ :�,` "' SeP•!B^ER f ,T I DO WATER VALVE L2 N00'40'07"E 34.90' C2 225.00' 65.72 16-44.5" }6,29S eq.fL �4444 ®.ve' Q�Y ` I _ e' 1 n I •P -;'�\ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL L3 NCD'40b7'E 50.01' C3 225.00' 57.79' 14'42'56" ' °C ` # C L4 SOD'40'O7"W 50.01' C4 225.00' 54.97' 13.59'57" d�',p T.�•' 12, R I• �, '��,. +P �r I i' L5 SOD'40'07"W 50.01' fi �.e° P.u.E ,L_J , I L6 NOO'31'DS'E 50.01' o�'o��t3"�,.J -s t4$��TY> 18�' I ��•\._ `�\1; ,11 N v o°m 11 / I 1'CONTOUR INTERNAL ! 2� I i�-'-- '•' vry�'Y N L...Ewa05 22 I'! �..._ _22 57.393a.fL I . -J•."`I 12'P.U.E-y I `:,1 \ s " , -'-5%L.b s2 `r 2!P3T `.f1. I 1 `14 25 I �I 30 R/W � So •� '1� _ N'. T" 1 1 OPEN SPACE I ( OP.EN-SP CE „`L.`-' /3 10.003 M.%,0.23 oc Y 10,)}2 o4.H..0.43 ac.025.10' .J }O• SIISEf HIGHWAY 191 HUFFINE LANE i SIGN GRAPHIC SCALE ® �° MORRISON �� RS TITh �'� MAIERLE,INC. SINCEPLANNERS (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) - An Em Oumad Cam F!°VR°- t°na BASIS OF R ARIN• AREA TABLE P.O.BM 1113 B01 fe0tl4bo BN4 ll N LIT 5MI•Fl—(405)567-Ml f(406)W7-1175 SOUTH UOPENE OF SECTION 9 6 ID75 1z65 AC REVISION DATE: NORTH 89'02'37"FAST OP SPACE 3.02 Ac REVISION DATE: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY NUMBER 1005B RGNT-OF-WAY lA9 AC DRAWN BY: KW DATE: 03/24/99 Tara 17.50 AC CHECKED BY: 1MH DRAWING NO.: PREPLAT2 ). JOB NO.:3130.001 Ol0 0310 SHEET 2 OF 2 1 • B. Sanitary Sewer Predicted wastewater generation for the Baxter Creek project will be based on guidelines found in the draft version of Bozeman's Wastewater Facility Plan. The design-reportifor the overall sewer system for the Valley West annexation, which includes the Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D, was completed in March 1998 and provided to the city of Bozeman's engineering staff. This design report, along with the city of Bozeman's draft Wastewater Facility Plan was the basis for the final design documents for the Valley West sewer system improvements project. The sewer trunk line for the Valley West annexation was installed in 1998. Based on this information, the Baxter Creek project will generatp:--1=58-gal-lons4of wastewater per minute during peak flows. Design of the system will be in compliance with Montana Public Works Standard Specifications with City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, 4`h Edition. The required minimum 8" pipe diameter for sewer mains will be more than sufficient for the estimated 158 gallons per minute wastewater flow generated by the project. • (?oxneGtio to the-C— ty'-s-sanitary=sewer_system�will include connecri-ng to'the=ne_wly3 constructed valley West trunka-ine--at.manhole-'#i0=located=in=Cot-to Nwooc�&Road. From the connection at manhole#10, the proposed sewer main will extend westward, 5 feet south of the Norton property line to the west boundary of the J. C. Billion Auto Plaza, then south along this property line to the proposed centerline of Competition Drive. The proposed sewer main will then extend west and south along the center line of Competition Drive to a point approximately 250 feet north of Huffine Lane. A`ll-se�w'er-line=construction-will=be-paid=for by tlie-Applicant:> C. Solid Waste Disposal The City of Bozeman, Three Rivers Disposal and Customized Services can provide service to this development with disposal at the Bozeman Landfill. See letters included in the Appendix. D. Streets and Roads City stand stiee�sectioos-for paved=str-eetswith-curb-and-gutter-and-sidewalks-are proposed-to be�modifiedfor-this-development.=Rights-of way are proposed to be 50 feet • in width and pavement is proposed to be 30 feet, back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Each lot Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 11 will have ample parking for customers and employees.` h� e design-objectiveJs-to open f ,pup;thestreets_cape=with--there,t m nation-of on:str-eet parking. With on-street parking prohibited, the proposed 30-foot street width is sufficient. �Q All lots within the development will have year-round access to interior streets. Mone=of ,the�Iots wil-l>have direct"ac ess to Highwayh-9+ the only arterial street adjacent to the site. A no-access strip along Highway 191 will be provided on the plat. Competition Drive will create a new connection to Highway 191, Huffine Lane.Any gxdsting,=MDO-T-approved:approachjpermit wiilxbe=utilized:_Extension of Competition Drive wi=ll-require t-he�abandonment:and=r-econstruction o—themex-stingigravpelsculide=sac with-n_thg,Billion Plaza-Subdivision;:*-Two additional street connections will be provided to adjacent properties. On the east line of Lot V, a­-25=fo.otiri-g-ht-of-way is_pr-oposed-to connect=Comp ie io Drive to=a-future-Textension-of Fallon=Street north of the project boundary (Fallon constructed by others). Approximately 600 feet north of Highway 191, a�5:0-foot-right=of way=for Nortca Drive_will connect Competition Drive to the west project boundary. This will-beapaved_torthe west boundary , Pollution from dust will not be a consideration because the roads serving the project will be paved. Road maintenance, including repair and snow removal, will be provided by the City of Bozeman. Funds for repair and maintenance will be provided by property taxes • paid to the City. Interior parking maintenance will be provided by the individual lots or the lot owners association. , ve--foot wide'sidewalks=are-proposed=alongFCompetion-Drive. The Appl-icant is proposing to co-nstruct�the sidewalks adjacent to akliopen--spac-e�are-a-s.,,Sidewalks along the in-dividug-l-lotsowould be delayed-unti-l-construction=i-s-fcomplete withinathe�lots_� Sidewalk construction adjacent to the lots can be=assuredias-acondition=of-he-required—, "O cc upaney Per-mit-su:� This is an attemptooyavoid--the--inevita-ble destr-u=tiori,ofsidewalks by constructiori�rvit-es. This approach will assure construction of sidewalks but avoid the expense of building them twice. Street installation-costs7will',be-paid=foi by-the=Applicant. Sidewalks will be constructed by the Applicant and the individual lot owners. Traffic Generation A Traffic Impact Study for the Baxter Creek Business Park has been completed. A copy of the study is included in the Appendix. A summary is provided herein. Calculations using the ITE Trip Generation Manual;6`h.Edition;1997)and actual traffic count data from Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (August 28, 1998) estimate that 20�4 h,les per hourJ(vph) will be_geaeratedlby the proposed development during,,p�eak:hours-in the year 2-0-1.0-(full build-out). Total traffic on_Cotton_wood=Road�--issprojecte-d t-o be:283-vph", Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 12 • compared to-1T1.6=presently. Competition Drive will see 83 vph at full build-out. Total contribution to traffic on Huffine Lane (from Cottonwood Road and Competition Drive) is expected to reach 162 vph, compared to 71 presently. The exis_ting.levels_of service=(LOS) on Huf"�_ fine-Lane, in the vieini:ty�of C-otton-wood ,Road;-is currenthfFs-fimateditobe.B,orabetteTAt the Cottonwood-Road/-Huffne-L-Lane intersection-,tallmovementsare`'currently operatirig=at-LOS B or--better, wAth-Athe.exception of left tur-ns,from the-north,-andrsouth-legs whichzar-ezestimated-to-beat;or exceeding, capacity_ Because of currently low traffic volumes, Cottonwood Road, Ferguson Road, Babcock Road, Durston Road and other two-lane roads, and their intersections,that would serve the project site are estimated to operate at LOS A or B. streets-and intersections wilhcontmueto operate at LO etter through"the year . 20i-0--(expected full buildout), with-the exc-eption.of_left-turns-onto Huffine Lane-at-the` Competition Drive and Cottonwood Road intersections. Ift-is-iaxpected that these movements will-be,L-OS:F-with-long-delays occurring: Because of these delays, some drivers may become impatient or feel pressured and may attempt this movement when it is not safe to do so. Only a small number of vehicles will experience these delays. It is anticipated that to avoid long delays during peak hours, most drfNers`wili-elect-to use•one ofrtheialternative�routes=available--to--leach=their-ultimate-destiiiati on. Traffic on these routes will be widely dispersed and is not expected to substantially impact any street or • intersection. Owing to the small number of vehicles that would be effected during peak hours, the availability of alternate routes and the necessity traffic moving rapicly on Highway 191,�a�traffic_s grial atFCottonwo_od Road__does not app'-" _ear�to be_warrarited-.at thiss tt me=However,.impacf fees generatedby thisproject would;beav_ail-able for mitigation f unan iiciic gated off site�impacts-(Tabl 4 E. Utilities All utilities will be placed underground. Location and screening of utility service connections to buildings are controlled by the Development Guidelines. �C_opies,of.the-_-.,.� l;preapplicationplan�have•been,8ent-"_to the Montana�Power-Company;U-S.;-West EC-ommunications-and TCI-Cablevision:ir'regards to providing electricity, gas,telephone and cable service to the Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision. A copy of the letters from Montana Power Company, TCI, and U. S. West are included in the A.ppendix-i in the Agency Letters section. Montana Power can provide both electric and natural gas service to the subdivision. It is expected that all other utilities will be able to provide service to this project. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 13 • F. Emergency Services The project lies within the Bozeman city limits. Response time for fire, police, and a ambulance services should all be�withi�_ n f veto=ten—minutes�A11_r�e-s,ponse letters are included in the Appendix in the section titled Agency Letters. cFAre-P-rotection- V Fire protection will be provided by the Cty_of Bozeman. Water will be provided by the City of Bozeman water system via appropriately spaced hydrants throughout Baxter Creek Business Park.,I.n-addi-ti-ori,-the Fire_Department indicated a-need-to provide each_-d oaf the buildings in-this projeewh-spnklersto-theresponse tune-to sys m greater than seven minutes. The nearest fire station is located at 410 South 19`h Avenue, a distance of two and one half miles from the site. A letter soliciting comments from the fire department and their response are in the Appendix. Police Protection The Bozeman Police Department's response-letter-states theyLare-concerned-about their Lability to-provide-adequate.-proteeti.on-for the City with their current staff resources. In all probability, the existing organizations will be sufficient to meet the emergency service • requirements of the proposed development. As a result of`increased tax-revenue generated by full development, additional-equipment-and-per 1 can bead_ded`to-mee-t� the increasing demands for service. The department also encourages=off-streetlightingjf the area since the area is isolated from the remainder of the City. Their comments are included within the Appendix. The City Police Department is 2-1/2 miles from the site. '-Street and-lot-lighiing-will-be-controlled by_tlZe-pe,__velop d done similar to the lighting in the Valley Commons PUD. Strom_ eet--lighting=along- mpetition-Drive-is-_� proposed to-be-instal-led-during=iri tiaL onstiucti ii 1 Ambulance/Medical Services Emergency medical services will be provided by Medtrans of Montana Ambulance Service located at 2101 Industrial Drive, immediately off of Griffin Drive. A copy of a letter from Medtrans of Montana is included in the Appendix. A trip to the nearest hospital, Bozeman Deaconess, would be approximately 5 miles from the site. G. Schools The Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. will not have residential lots, therefore,no school children will be generated by the project. The project would increase the local property tax base, which in-turn, supports the school system. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 14 I • H. Land Use The site of the Baxter Creek Business Park PUD was annexed into the City of Bozeman along with other properties as part of the Valley West Annexation. At the same time, j the size-was-designated-for commercial uses-in-the-Bozeman Area Master P_lan_and-zoned cBusin sse Park-(B-P)�,The PUD-application for the property will request a modification of the permitted use list in the B-P zoning. Land use regulations governing the proposed subdivision include the Bozeman Area Master Plan, Bozeman Zoning Ordinance, including Entryway Corridor Regulations, City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, and the proposed Baxter Creek Business Park PUD Development Guidelines. Existing adjacent land uses consist of agricultural to the west and north, residential and agricultural to the south and business (J.C. Billion Auto Plaza)to the east. Adjacent zoning consists of A-S to the south and west, R-3 to the north and B-P to the east. I. Housing No residential uses or lots are proposed for this site. The proposed number of Planned Unit Development lots is eight. The proposed lot uses are a mixture of B-2 and B-P uses • with restrictions imposed by the Development Guidelines. J. Parks and Recreation Facilities Because the application is for a commercial PUD, no parkland-dedication.is required. However, the PUD section of the Bozeman Zone Code requires an open space dedication !i of 30%, which the proposed site plan meets. A-ppmgmately_8.6%_of the_open_space wily be on site. The remaining open space will be provided by a park land dedication in a Bronken Park. A variance request concerning this matter has been approved by thej Bozeman City Commission. The proposed open space areas would include the previously mentioned corridor along Baxter Creek that aligns with the existing corridor provided by the Billion Plaza Subdivision. In the long term, this stream corridor would connect, via future developments to the north, with the proposed Bronken Park stream corridor south of Durston Road. No dedicated parks are proposed within the project. As per the conditions of the Bronken Park dedication, an-ac� tive-recreafion-area sutablelfor-future"employees is included. This is�,n rth-of-L-o` t*l-arid shown in- i�4-the PUD-Site Plan. The area provided is approximately 1%3 of an acre and will consist of a tunf area th_t will grade into -the Baxter Creek corridor.-It-will be maintained-by-the-lot--o�ners issociation-and include c 3-picnic_tables-and one prcriib sh�r. -- —� Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 15 K. Taxation Acreage The entire 17.53 acres is in one taxation category and within the parcel # RGG 27102. rEx sfi n Taxe-sl The county parcel number is RGG 27102. The total county property taxes for the property area$§r7947611for-ta"-xfy-inra1997-1998. Other Encumbrances and Obligations Upon annexation of the property in December of 1997, a waiver of right-to-protest the creation of RID's and SID's was signed as a condition of annexation. The RID-SID's could include "rnainten`anee of any parksithin the annexed area and/or of a City-wide Park Maintenance District, which would provide a mechanism for the fair and equitable assessment of maintenance costs for such parks, and for street improvements, including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk and storm drainage for: a) West Babcock;Street; b) Durston,� Road; c) Ferguson=Road;,-and d) Cottonwood-Road. • An icip�axes, Anticipated tax revenues atqullib-0dtout are expected to be approximatel}'4$*,2�718,4Y2.9 4511 annually (1999 dollars) in street, tree and total county general property taxes. A,pproximatel-y-&$8-2f4841�77l'of1tHi would go to�the'Ci=tyrof,tBo eeman;4the balance to the State, County and schools. dmpactifeelslat�149,9,9jrates�al_lLofiwhichcwould,golto�thewC-_ity� +� , of Bozernanwarei petted o beiin�theirange ofi$6r49i 566�20. These estimates do not include other tax revenues, such as personal property taxes or taxes on materials and equipment located on site. Estimating Anticipated Taxes The first step in estimating the market value for each lot is to determine the building area and number of parking spaces using the Concept Master Plan for the project, and assigning a value to these improvements. The following table illustrates the breakdown for each lot: Baxter Creek Business.Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 16 0 0 • Table K.1 -Estimated Lot Market Value i Lot No. Available Area for Site Building Size No. Parking Estimated Market Improvements(Acre) (Square feet) Spaces Value 1 5.22 54,208 161 $5,903,800.00 2 1.19 11,878 54 $1,349,800.00 3 1.10 10,580 60 $1,238,000.00 4 0.86 10,686 38 $1,182,600.00 5 0.83 10,686 38 $1,182,600.00 6 1.22 12,709 48 $1,414,900.00 7 1.05 13,646 33 $1,463,600.00 8 1.18 11,022 45 $1,237,200.00 Total 7 $14,972,500.00 The market value was calculated as follows: A. Building Market Value = $100/sf Building Area B. Parking Lot Market Value = $3,000/Parking Space including landscaping • C. Total Market Value = Sum A and Sum B. The next step is to estimate taxable value. This is done by multiplying the market value times 0.03816, a factor determined by the State of Montana. Taxable value would be: $14,972,500 x 0.03816 = $571,350.60 The taxable value may be further adjusted by a"slippage" factor, which represents a reduction based on the age of the property. In general, newer properties are assessed at a value approaching 100% of market value, while older properties may be as low as 30%. For the purposes of this estimate, it will be assumed that this property will be assessed at a100% of its market value. The taxable value is then multiplied by the mill levies for the different entities receiving revenue from the County general property tax, which in this case would yield property taxes as indicated on the following page: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 17 i • Estimated General Property Taxes, 1999 Dollars City of Bozeman General Property Tax: $571,350.60 x 0.13679 = $ 78,155.05 Education Taxes (includes all state and local school taxes): $571,350.60 x 0.28638 = $163,623.38 County General Taxes: $571,350.60 x 0.05657 = $ 32,321.30 Total General Property Taxes: $274,099.73 In addition to general property taxes, the City of Bozeman assesses street and tree taxes based on lot size. The estimated street and tree taxes for the subject property are presented as follows in Tables K.2 and K.3: • Table K.2 - Estimated Annual Street Taxes Lot Lot Size Lot Size Tax Rate Annual Tax No. (Acre) (Square Feet) $/sq. ft. 1 5.22 227,393 0.00645 $1,466.69 2 1.19 52,013 0.00645 $335.48 3 1.10. 48,012 0.00645 $309.68 4 0.86 37,275 0.00645 $240.42 5 0.83 36,038 0.00645 $232.45 6 1.22 53,345 0.00645 $344.08 7 1.05 45,711 0.00645 $294.84 8 1.18 51,512 0.00645 $332.25 Total Estimated Annual Street Taxes $3,555.89 • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 18 • Table K.3 -Estimated Annual Tree Taxes Lot Lot Size Lot Size Tax Rate Annual Tax No. (Acre) (Square Feet) $/sq. ft. 1 5.22 227,393 0.0014 $318.35 2 1.19 52,013 0.0014 $72.82 3 1.10 48,012 0.0014 $67.22 4 0.86 37,275 0.0014 $52.19 5 0.83 36,038 0.0014 $50.45 6 1.22 53,345 0.0014 $76.68 7 1.05 45,711 0.0014 $64.00 8 1.18 51,512 0.0014 $72.12 _i Total Estimated Annual Tree Taxes $773.83 Impact Fees • The City of Bozeman assesses street and fire impact fees for commercial properties based on the square footage of the anticipated use. Impact fees for water and sewer are assessed based on anticipated size of service line for domestic water consumption. The estimated impact fees for Baxter Creek Business Park are indicated in the following Tables KA through K.7. The tables list impact fees by lot. Table KA - Estimated 1999 Street Impact Fees Lot Building Size Impact Fee (Rate % of Impact 1998 Impact No. (Square Feet) per 1,000 s . ft.) Fee Applied Fees 1 54,208 3649.83 90 $178,064.99 2 11,878 3256.88 90 $34,816.70 3 10,580 3256.88 90 $31,012.01 4 10,686 3256.88 90 $31,322.72 5 10,686 5239.61 90 $50,391.43 6 12,709 5239.61 90 $59,931.18 7 13.646 5239.61 90 $64,349.75 8 11,022 5239.61 90 $51,975.88 • Total Estimated Street Impact Fee $501,864.66 Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 19 • Note: Street Impact Fees are determined as follows: Lot One - New Car Sales Lots Two, Three, and Four - General Office Building Lots Five, Six, Seven, and Eight - Retail ( Under 50,000 sq. ft) Table K.5 - Estimated 1999 Fire Impact Fees Lot Building Size Impact Fee (Rate % of Impact 1998 Impact No. (Square Feet) per 1,000 s : ft.) Fee Applied Fees 1 54,208 473.44 90 $23,097.81 2 11,878 285.97 90 $3,057.08 3 10,580 285.97 90 $2,723.01 4 10,686 285.97 90 $2,750.29 I 5 10,686 285.97 90 $2,750.29 6 j 12,709 285.97 90 $3,270.95 7 13.646 285.97 90 $3,512.11 8 11,022 285.97 90 $2,836.77 • Total Estimated Fire Impact Fee $43,998.31 Table K.5 - Estimated 1999 Water Impact Fees Lot Water Meter/Line Size Cost/Meter % of Impact 1998 Impact No. (Inches) Fee Applied Fees 1 1.50 11,290.53 90 $10,161.48 2 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 3 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 4 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 j 5 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 6 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 7 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 8 1.00 5,645.26 90 $5,080.73 Total Estimated Water Impact Fee $45,726.59 • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 20 • Table K.6 -Estimated 1999 Sewer Impact Fees i i Lot Water Meter/Line Size Cost/Meter % of Impact 1998 Impact No. (Inches) Fee Applied Fees 1 1.50 14,314.40 90 $12,882.96 2 1.00 7,157.73 90 $6,441.96 3 1.00 7,157.73 90 $6,441.96 4 1.00 7,157.73 90 $6,441.96 5 1.00 7J 57.73 90 $6,441.96 i 6 1 1.00 7,157.73 90 $6,441.96 7 1.00 7,157.73 90 $6,441.96 8 1.00 7,157.73 90 $6,441.96 Total Estimated Sewer Impact Fee $571976.68 L. Accessibility of Service Systems and Facilities • The following table provides the approximate distances to each community service and the type of road to be traveled: Table L.1 - Accessibility of Services Unimproved T Graded . Graveled Paved Fire Protection 0 0 0 1-1/2 Police Protection 0 0 0 3-1/2 Hospital Facilities 0 0 0 4-1/2 Elementary School 0 0 0 1-3/4 High School 0 0 0 1-1/2 M. Effects on Agriculture Currently, of the 17.53 acres contained in the proposed Baxter Creek Business Park PUD, • approximately 12 acres are planted in grain crops, 1.1 acres is used for pasture, and the remainder of the site is vacant. Page 21 • Adjacent agricultural operations in the vicinity of this proposed subdivision include grain crops and grass production. Effects on agricultural production of the adjacent owners will be negligible. The site is Master Planned and zoned for the uses proposed. N. Effects on Agricultural Water User Facilities As mentioned in earlier portions of this report, Baxter Creek bisects the project site. This water course has been classified by the Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks as a combination stream/ditch and carries irrigation water to down stream users. A stream/ditch classification adds an additional review step by the Gallatin Conservation Board for any discharges, culvert additions, or realignment that affects the watercourse. Permits Q 10) will be obtained for any construction activity planned in or around Baxter Creek. Effects on Baxter Creek will be minimal and its carrying capacities for down stream users will not be reduced. Stormwater treatment structures shall mitigate sediment concerns presented by the commercial businesses contribution of discharge into the creek. • i • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 22 • rSUaMMARY O:F—P1V0BABLE=IM1!ACTS-1 A. The Effect on Agriculture and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts: Section M of the Community Impact Statement discusses the current agricultural uses for the subject property. Approximately 13 acres of agricultural land within the project boundary will be converted to the commercial uses presented in the preliminary plat. Effects on agricultural production of the adjacent owners will be negligible. The site is Master Planned and zoned for the uses proposed. B. The Effect on Agricultural Water User Facilities and Proposed Mitigations: Section N of the Community Impact Statement discusses the current agricultural water user facilities on the subject property. Stormwater treatment structures will be used to mitigate sediment contribution into Baxter Creek. Permits (310) will be obtained for any construction activity planned in or around Baxter Creek. As such,effects on Baxter Creek will be minimal and its carrying capacities for down stream users will not be reduced. • C. The Effect on Local Services and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts: Water and sewage disposal: Sections A and B of the Community Impact Statement discuss methods of water supply and sewage disposal for the Baxter Creek Business Park. In summary, the project will be connected to the City of Bozeman's water main system and wastewater collection system. As such, no on site water supply wells or sewage disposal facilities are proposed. Emergency services: Sections E, F and G of the Community Impact Statement discuss emergency services at the proposed site. Emergency services would be provided by the city of Bozeman and paid for through annual property taxes and impact fees as discussed in Section K. Letters soliciting comments from the various emergency service providers and their responses are in the Appendix. Off-site roads: There is no identified need to upgrade or extend off-site public roads. However, approximately $501,865 in impact fees will be generated by this project for off- site improvements and maintenance. Educational Services: Residential lots are not a part of the Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Therefore, no school children will be attending schools in the district as a result of the development. However, of the estimated $163,623 in annual education revenues • generated by the project, approximately$89,919 would go directly to local school districts ($571,351 taxable value x .15738 mills = $89,919). Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 23 • Current and Estimated Property Taxes: Current annual property taxes are $579.76. Estimated annual tax revenues at full build out would be approximately $278,429.45 (1999 dollars) in street, tree and total county general property taxes. Provision of Utilities and Easements: All utilities will be installed underground by private entities in cooperation with the project owners. All utility providers have indicated that they can provide the utility easements illustrated in the preliminary plat. Access to all lots will be from the dedicated rights-of-way and no private access easements are required. A no access strip is provided along Highway 191 D. The Effect on the Natural Environment and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts Road Drainage and Erosion: Surface runoff and erosion will be controlled during construction of roads through the use of silt fences, straw bale barriers and temporary stormwater retention/detention ponds as described in the Stormwater Master Plan. (to be submitted to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality). These measures, combined with the site's level terrain(approximately 1 '/2%)mitigate the potential impacts of stormwater runoff and road drainage during construction. Post construction impacts have been mitigated through the use of detention ponds and drainage ditches as indicated on the Baxter Creek Business Park Drainage Plan (Figure 6). • GradinQ and drainage plan, including stormwater facility maintenance plan: Stormwater treatment will be provided on a per lot basis. 310 permits will be issued for the discharge of treated stormwater to Baxter Creek and a proposed drainage ditch to be constructed along the west boundary of the proposed subdivision. Maintenance of the stormwater facilities will be conducted by the lot owners association or individual lot owners. Effects on native vegetation, soils, quality or quantity of surface or ground waters: Approximately 2.36 acres of open space is proposed within the Baxter Creek Corridor. This, combined with several riparian area (wetland) enhancements, will enhance the quality and character of native vegetation on site. A 404 permit has been obtained from the Army.Corps of Engineers for all wetland enhancements. Surface water will be protected through development of the Baxter Creek Corridor and associated riparian area enhancements. Water quality protection will be further assured through application to the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Service for the necessary 310 permits. Local groundwater degradation is not anticipated due to the utilization of the city of Bozeman's central water and sewer systems. Weed Control: Weeds will be controlled asQgrianiappro�ediWeedtManagem ne t9Plan. The Baxter Creek Business Park RU.D's iap-lip cationlfor establishment of a Weed Management Plan h2s1beenrsubinittedto the County Weed Supervisor. Enforcement of the plan will be • the responsibility of the lot owners association. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 24 • • E. The Effect on Wildlife Habitat and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts Proximity to area of significant wildlife habitat or critical wildlife areas: Wildlife values of the Baxter Creek Business Park will be enhanced by development of the Baxter Creek Corridor and associated riparian area enhancements. Returning Baxter Creek to its original meandering course will improve habitat for both birds and small mammals. Expected effects of pets and human activity on wildlife: Due to the commercial land use being proposed,pets will not be an significant threat to the wildlife species that will occupy the Baxter Creek Corridor. Effects on fisheries: Returning Baxter Creek to its original meandering course will improve local fisheries by enhancing the habitat available for cover and feeding Effects on access to public lands,trails,hunting or fishing,areas:No public lands are located in the vicinity of the subject property. As such access to public lands is not an issue. However,regional public access will be improved by continuing the Baxter Creek corridor and associated trail from the adjacent Billion development. Hunting will be prohibited within the project boundaries - including the Baxter Creek Corridor. However, because of improved habitat, fishing opportunities may be enhanced along the Corridor. • F. The Effect on Public Health and Safety and Proposed Mitigation of Impacts Natural Hazards: There are no known natural hazards such as wildfire, flooding, snow, landslides or excessive slopes that expose the proposed uses of the site to unacceptable or unmitigated risks. Man-Made Hazards: There are no man-made hazards on site or in the vicinity that would expose the proposed uses of the sit to unacceptable or unmitigated risks. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 25 • PART III.A PUD APPLICATION PUD Submittal Requirements (Chapter 18.54.60, B) This section outlines submittal requirements(Document Requirements,Preliminary Site Plan Requirements, and Supplemental Requirements) for preliminary plan submittals. 1. Document Requirements: 1 a. Application Forms: The application PUD form is provided. lb. List of Owners and Applicants: The list is provided on the application form. 1 c. Legal Description of the Site: This is provided on the application form and on the Preliminary Plat. Id. Cop. of f Adjacent Owners Within 400 Feet of the Site: Owing to the size of the undeveloped parcels adjacent to the project site,the list of owners within 400 feet is the same list as the immediately adjacent owners,which is provided in the Appendix. • le. Statement of Planning Objectives: i. Statement of Applicable City Land Use Policies and Objectives: This is provided in Part III.B, following, that addresses the requirements of 18.54.020, Intent of planned unit development. ii. (A) Statement of Proposed Ownership for Open Space: Three-types-of-open ispace.are-proposed. Open space wi-th-i-n-the-indiv duallpts will beowned-and mai-ntainedb-y_the-i_ndivi-dual-lot owners.)Commo open space located along Baxter-Creek-and-fhe_5:O.mfdot wide corridor=along_Highway-.-S` will`be owned-and maintaned_b_y_the lot=owners_association: These -areas-1 cha--ve-a total-area=of_3:.0=Lacres. The third type of open space is a-1.35-acres addition-(dedication)-to-Br-onl en_Park� This off site-dedicatiop was approved as a variance by the Bozeman City Commission and will sunset within six months of the approval date unless an additional land use permit is secured for the property. ii. (B) Applicant's intentions with regard to ownership of all portions of the PUD: The proposed dot_s:iwould-be=s_oid_to individual entities. All buildings constructed would be by the future owners. Building and landscaping construction will be controlled by the Development Guidelines. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 26 • iii. Estimate of Employee Numbers:Total number of estimat_ ted-employees at fu 1 <bui-l_d_out will vary between approximately1-90�and50_0�These numbers are calculated by comparing the maximum possible building areas to employee estimates per square foot. If Lot 1 becomes an auto dealership, the 54,000 square foot building will have approximately 108 employees (2.0 emp. per 1,000 square feet of building from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 4"Ed. p. 1209 and 1214, and ITE 6"Ed. p. 1441 and 1447). If the estimated 81,000 square feet of buildings on the other 7 lots develop as office buildings,there will be approximately 389 more employees (4.8 emp. per t,000 square feet of building from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 4`h Ed., Table IV-1, p.7). If the 81,000 square feet in the other building develop as retail outlets typical of B-2 zoning,the estimated number of employees would be approximately 81 more (1 emp. per 1,000 square feet of building, (The Fiscal Impact Handbook by Burchell and Listokin,Center for Policy Research,Piscataway, NJ, 1983,p.138). iv. Description of the Rationale Behind Assumptions and Choices Made By the Applicant: The design of the Baxter Creek Business Park is 'intended toimeet-� the objectives of the-`Sozeman-Entryway=Corr-idor=H-ghwayz1=9=1--in.addition to the following--d-esi=gn-objecti_ves�1)By looping Competition Drive through the site,provide cbuster-ed=bus ness-sites2that are integrated with surrounding • properties. 2) Add to the ol:uster-ing=effect,by sharing-parking lots and accesses where possible. 3)Help-break=the ttendei cy-toward=so-l-id fr�trip , d-evR-opmerit�along arterial roads by=cr-eating=a s--gni-f cant�=gap=between buildings fronting on Highway 191. 4) Pr-ovide=a--campus:like_setting,,for future employees. 5)add=to the,open space/trail-corridor along Baxter Creek started by the Billion Plaza PUD. V. Community Design Objectives and Section 18.54.100 Criteria: These issues are addressed in Part III.B, following. vi. Description of How Conflicts Between Land Uses are Avoided or Mitigated: The permitted uses in Baxter Creek and the open space location are compatible with the Billion Auto Plaza project to the east. The circulation network, pedestrian and vehicular, integrates with the Billion project and provides access points for future development to the north and west. A 50- foot, landscaped buffer is provided along Highway 191.1Setbacks=alongA-hem west and=north-are provided:—r-5 feet--for-parking areas--an3 25efeetihr boil-dings:As per the Development Guidelines,theSrearso-f=_the=bui-ldings will be-submitted-=toffth-e=same-architectural=treatments-a-s=the front-and-sides Potential conflicts with adjacent uses, existing and potential, are addressed in Part III.0 (PUD Criteria). • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 27 • vii. Statement of Design Methods to Rau-ce-Energy-C—onsumpfion The mix of potential uses within the project, shared parking and pedestrian circulation considerations will encourage one-stop shopping thereby reducing energy consumption. Building construction will be conducted in accordance with Bozeman building codes and standards appropriate to this climate for insulation thereby minimizing building heating and cooling costs. The Development Guidelines encourage the use of energy efficient windows and doors, proper solar orientation and entry vestibules to reduce heating and cooling costs. If. Development Schedule: All site improvements will be installed during initial construction. Timing of development within the individual lots will be determined by the market,but will be controlled by the Development Guidelines. Construction would be anticipated=to begin in the fal=Foof 1=9-98, with occupancy of the first buildings being in late summer to aLtll--o�_f=L999:_1 o p 1 g. Reduced Versions of Drawings: These have been provided at appropriate locations. 2. Preliminary Site Plan Requirements: • 2a. Percentage and Square Footage of Public Rights-of-way, The right-of-way acreage is shown on the Preliminary Site Plan. The 1=86-acr-es=of right=of way-is 10.6% of the total area. 2b&c. Boundaries, Percentage and Square Footage of Active Recreational Use Area: Not applicable, the application is for a commercial subdivision. However, as per the conditions of approval for the open space deviation by the City Commission, a recreational space suitable for future employees is shown on the Preliminary Site Plan. This area occupies approximately 1/3 acre. 2d. Location and Acreage of Common Open Areas and All Public and Semi-public Land Uses, Including Public Parks. Recreation Areas. School Sites, and Similar Uses: Locations/acreages of common open spaces are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan. 2e. Location of Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Circulation System, Including Interrelationships with the Vehicular Circulation System, Indicating; the Proposed Treatment of Points of Conflict: These are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan, discussed in further detail in Part III.0 and on the landscaping plan. The trail in the Baxter Creek corridor will tie to the existing trail built in the Billion Auto Plaza open space. • 2f. Existing and Proposed Vehicular Circulation and Parking Systems: These are shown on the preliminary plat and the Preliminary Site Plan. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 28 • 2 . Proposed Treatments on the Perimeter of the Project Site: This is shown on the � J landscaping plan. 2h. Adjacent Site and Miscellaneous Information: This is provided in the vicinity maps, the Preliminary Site Plan,the Environmental-Community Impact Assessment and the .preliminary plat. 2i. Supplemental Vicinity Map(s): These have been provided. 2j. Certificates: These are provided on the Preliminary Plat. 3. Supplemental Plan Requirements: 3a. Viewsheds: Because the site is flat, there are no areas on site that are of higher visibility than others. The entire site is visible from Higway 191 and the surrounding private lands. This concern has been addressed by the community by establishment of the entryway corridor regulations which apply to the site. Adherence to the recommendations and regulations of the entryway corridor are discussed in Part III.C, in the overall project design and in the development guidelines. The most distinctive view across the site is the view to the north towards the distant Bridger • Mountains. Building heights are controlled by the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and limited to under 38 feet. 3b. Recreation and Trails: This subject is addressed in Part IIIC. C. Historic Resources: This subject is addressed in Part III.C. 3d. Street Cross Sections, Sidewalks and Bikeway Streets are proposed to be 30 feet in width with standard curbs and gutters and no on-street parking. The street sections will be designed in accordance with City of Bozeman standards. These items are discussed in Part IIIC and shown on the preliminary site plan. Pedestrian facilities are provided within the site along Competition Drive and the Baxter Creek corridor. A 6-foot wide curvilinear sidewalk will be provided along Highway 191. This subject is discussed in Part III.C. 3e. Phigraphic Data Including Soils and Hydrologic Information: These subjects have been addressed in the Environmental-Community Impact Assessment. 3f. Drainage Plan: Information on this subject is provided in Part II, EA-CIS. 3g. Temporary Facilities Plan: There are no temporary facilities proposed other than • those that are permitted during construction of the site infrastructure and buildings. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 29 • 3h. Preliminary Subdivision Plat: This is provided. 3i. Traffic Impact Analysis: A traffic analysis is provided in the .Appendix. The information generated from the traffic analysis was used as the basis for recommended improvements to the site and surrounding street systems. The traffic impact analyses required for subdivision and PUD submittals are identical. 3j. Additional Studies and Plans: A wetlands evaluation (full copy provided for the City-County Planning Department) was completed as part of this project. PART III.B INTENT OF PUD (Response to Chapter 18.54.020) The following narration is provided to aT"dress-t.he 1=3-items= )Vthr-ough M-)-1;isted=in=Chapter 18:54:020=(PIID-sectio'n)='bf the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Conformance with these is required in Chapter 18.54.050 C.3.1. 18.54.020"... it shall be the intent of this title to pr-omote-the=ci-tyzs:pur-suit.of thexfollovw ng cornxnunity-oobj e=tives Y • A. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the zoning jurisdiction of the city is in accord with:theici y' adopted-master plan, its specific-elements=and:its:goals;objective sand, policies; Response: The proposed Baxter Creek Business Park is in compliance with the Ua11ey.West=Masten Plan Amendmentzto the Bozeman Area-Mvl ster-Plan?The project would permit commercial uses, which is the land use designation adopted for the site. Through PUD approval, the project will comply with the B-P zoning of the site. B. To encourage innovations=inland-deve opmentland redevelopment so that gr-eaterzopportwn_ities for bettt re housing;recreation-shopping-and=employment-may-extend-to all citizens of the Bozeman area; Response: The project complies by-providi-ng-shopping_and-emplo_yme-nt—oppo-tuni:ties-in=a:l-ocat-i-on>that is readi-l-y-=accessiblexto--residents of Bozeman and the Gallatin valley while complying with the entryway design guidelines which seek to create an attractive entry into the community. C. To foster the sa€e;-effcient-and-economic use-of land-and-trap.sportation.and other public.faciliti�� Response: • The project would ibegin thegjE i p�that will more efficiently utilize recently struct constructed public infraure along Cottonwood and Durston Roads. The site provides Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 30 • an efficient location in terms of access for the broader community. Efficiencies in land use are encouraged through the use of shared parking access and reduced side yard setbacks in the parking areas. D. To ensure adequate prevision=of-public ser-vices:sueM-as--water,sewer,electricity,open space and public parks; Response: Park land dedications are not required due to the commercial nature of the project,however, it does meet the PUD 30% open space requirements of the zoning ordinance and provides an active recreation area suitable for a commercial area. Adequate levels of public services such as sewer, water and electricity can be provided. E. To avoid=inappropriate-development=of lands'and=to-p vro i-be adequate=drainage-andireduction of flood damage; Response: The site beg-i-ns-the-pr-ecess-of-infi=Fl1that will utilize the recently developed utilities installed for the Valley West Annexation area. The recent annexation,Master Plan Amendment and zone change indicates that this site is appropriate for the intended commercial uses. Adequate dr-ainage.wi1L-be:assurediby adherence to City and MDEQ standards. There are • no=des-ignate iflood-plains;within the project area. Baiter Creek=has.al-irn-ited-dr-ainage area upstream from the site and does not represent a flooding threat. F. To encouragempattems--of development wtiich-decrease-automobil�--travel-and=encourage�tr con olidat=ion,thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; Response: The business park-concept enc_ou_rage-s-eonsol-idation-of_trips.m The on-site pedestrian-= circulation--system will be linked,�to public=pedestr-ian=faci-1-ities--on)the perimeter of the site. The site is located in ansar-ea-that-provides-for'shopping�7or eervi-ce=stops--while=enroute:Lto==b other-destinations-in-or out:of=town;which can,r-esuit i rn educed=traff c---=- - G. To promote the,useTofbicycles and waik-ng asTeffeetive modes of transportation; Response: 1?edestnan/bicycle=faci=l=ities=are pro ided within the project. The sitezis-inoticurrentl-ywery, accessible for=pedestrians-nor is it anticipatedito--be=a£generator--of pedestr-ian=traff c:As the area north of the site develops, the number of pedestrians in the area will increase. The proposed facilities will be capable of providing pedestrian movement within and through the site. H. To reiiucFenergyaeonsumptionYand demand; • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 31 • • • Response: The business park concept ericour-ages-one-stoPshoP Ping�--therebY reducing vehicle trip generation. The Development Guideline encourages energy efficient construction and landscaping. I. To rn:inimize-adverse,environmental--im pacts;of development and to protect special features of the geography; Response: The Baxter Greek-corridor would be enhanced-jand preserved as a consequence of this project. State and local standards will be adhered to for all proposed construction. J. To improve the design,quality_and-char-acter.-of_newdevelopments; Response: In general, the project_design-theme-will be the same as that used within the Valley Commons PUD for building and landscaping. Common areas will be maintained by a lot owners K. To encourage development-of-vacant-properties within=developed-areas; • Response: . The site is c..urrentl-_y_unde-v_el_oped-and=this-pr-ojec—will=begin=the--infil_1-process=that_became inevitable with the construction of utilities related to the Valley West Annexation. L. To protest ex sg ne ghborho_ ods-from the karmfu:l-encroachment-of-newer,—incompatible, developme_ nts;-and Response: The project is in compliance=with the BozemanAr_eaLlaster Plan.and the underlying zoning; �/ both of which establish that the proposed use is appropriate for the site. Landscaping;bu_fferl ��J� - / spa_ ees-and=the-architectural=tr-eatment=of_the-rear yards will mJ mize-potential- �=J tt--incompatabilities. M. To(promote-logica-1 development-patterns-ofYesidential,=commercial,office-and-industrial-u—ses� that will(mut aall-y_benefit-the deve`loper,-th nee ighborhoo�d,and-the_community as a whole. Response: The=master-plan-and-zoning=designation=Lfor this area has=already-determined-that)the proposed commercial_use_is-a--logical�:,use-for this-site. The requirements of subdivision review and the PUD process will further ensure that the proposed project is compatible with and a benefit to the neighborhood and community. • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 32 • PART III.0 PUD Criteria (Response to Chapter 18.54.100) All-Development Cr_iteria..(NeighborkoodFCompatibility): 1. Is the development compatible with and sensit____,irve,to;the immediate environment of the site ands �- ----. hihe-adjacent_neighbo.rhoodss ee.lative.to_arciiifectu`ral:desi9n,bci:lding bu't'k;and;height+,neighbor_ hood identity%landscapig,historiealacliaracter,orientation-ofbuildings-on-the-site_and--visual=integration. Response: The project is compatible with the land use designations on and adjacent to the site. The surrounding area�is undeveloped-except-for=the Bi:l--B n Plaza-PU-D}located to the east. The area has been recently zoned for the proposed uses. Land-scaping,visual-integration;xand---= bui-ld-i-ng=design=are,a11 designed to meetrth-e obj-ecti-vesoftheentryway=corridor=Parking-and vdisplayla`reas adjacent to High way`OI a screened=by-landscaping:There are no historic structures, sites, or land uses in the immediate vicinity 2. Is the project designed so that additional-tr-afficigeneration-beyond-what--may-be=approvedzfor permirced-uses does not havea ignifcant-advecseimpaci.on.adjacent_and7surrounding uses? Response: • Traffic generated by the project will..fa_l-1=within--theirange-antici-Dated for-the: which is B-P. Traffic impacts to Huffine Lane and Cottonwood are not significant enough to warrant signalization of the intersection. The project would generate significant property taxes, impact fees, and street taxes to support street maintenance and traffic impact. mitigation. 3. Have the gi-idet`in s outlined in Chapter 18.51, Development Review Committee,b—en=followed concerning identification and discussion of impacts related to the proposed development? Response: The project has been through DRC review and the recommendations have been incorporated into the plans.. 4. Is the development in ac�cordan-ce-wiih=the adopted-elements7df-tWBozeman-Area-Master.Plan and its accompanying goals,objectives and policies? Response: The proposal is in compliance with the Bozeman Area Master Plan,notably with one of the majoriobj.ectiWes of the plan;whit-h-is-to encou ar ge clustered commercial=developmenfalong, the-C'i•ty�`ajentryways.r � �ft,is;in=compliance with)entry-wayScorridor-zoning. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 33 cA4.L�}evelopmerrt-C-riteria-(P-nblic FaciIities,-Serwices-and Transportation): 5. Does the development oornp wyl th=all.city=design standards-requirements_and speci�fcat ons for the following services: Water supply Trails/walks/bikeways Sanitary supply Irrigation Companies Fire protection Electricity Flood hazard areas Natural Gas Telephone Storm drainage Cable television Response:_—__ Yeses 11 public and private facilities wi-1=l=be-desgned-and=instal-led=to-Gity=of-B.ozeman,_., ----------- MDEQ,and other applicable=standar-d-s?Proposed=street-standards-wi-li be-reviewed-through3 the,PUD_process.14 Trails and sidewalks are proposed. The site is not anticipated to be a significant generator of pedestrian traffic. 6. Will the sewageewage g n re a an re e a ed by the development not-exceed--the-sanita y—sewe-system=s_line-and; treatment-capacity? Response: Capacities-of the service lines and the treatment plant wirl not be=exceeded. Sewage from • the site wild=utilize=new-infrastructure=installed as part of the Valley West Annexation. The sewer system design is based on Bozeman's draft Wastewater Facility Plan. 7. Will an adequate-water-supply exist to serve the development? Response: Water supply�will be available from the_new-infrastructure_instailed=foi the Val=ley West Annexation. The water systern=design=ins=based-on_$ozeman's_draft-Water--Facility Plan 8. Will an adequate elect`r-ical=supply-exist-to serve the development? Response: C.Yes. -The Montana Power Company was contacted and will be able to service the site. 9. Will the City T ansp'ortatioa-Rlan be capable of handling the developments traffic generation? Response: The 1993 Transportation=Plan=Update does--not-adequately-address_traffic-in_this-vicinity. The Traffic Study for the project do.esmot=ariti`cipa a sig—ni-fe nt traffic problems' as a consequence of development. The project would gerieiate-significant:traffic--impact=fees=ands property-taxes-for-future maintenance,. • 10. Does the development provide=adequate=access--for-emergency-ser-vice?-' Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 34 - • Response: Yes=Puljlic access will be immediately available from two sides, Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane. I I. Are all vehic``u.lar_use_areas-and-e_ __ xterior buiIdina-aceas-pr-ovided-with-adequ ate_security..lighting?. -- Response: Lighting-is-proposed for all-parking�areas-and toads. This will be done in accordance with design guidelines for the project, which-are_similar to the Valley Commons PUD.� All-aCv—elo intent C—niter-ia--(Natu.ral_ResowVesl!� 12. Hlave:precautions_been-taken-to=minimiiehazards-to-fife-or_property due=to=irrigation_canals;--�, stream_channels-or other-water=bodies?---3 Response: There is oril-y-one_signi=f cant=sur-face--water-feature--on_site1 Baxter Creek/Ditch. The stream channel wrll-be-real-igned_to_a more-natural corfiguration)and landscaped in accordance with the 404 (wetlands)permit. This will result in reduced back slopes into the stream channel. The proposed storm water detention facilities will be shallow with gently sloped banks. They will hold water for only brief intervals. Baxter Creek itself does not pose a flooding hazard. • 13. Have known areas of natn al-or-geologic hazar-d,(e.g. unstable or potentially unstable slopes, faulting, landslides, rockfalls, floods, and wildfire, etc.),00r soil-c-onditions_unfavorable_to-urban-, development adspecial•engineeringpmcautions_taken;to overcome natural constraints or have these areas been set aside from development? Response: There are no geologic or natural hazards on site. Soil limitationsWare=wel-l-under-stood-and rhave_been-dealt wwith-successfully throughout=the-Bozeman-area. 14. Does the project,preserve or replace_naturalweget`ation? Response: Natural-vegetation will-be-preserved-andLo er rpaced=in-the-open=space=cor-r-idor adjacent to Baxter Creek, which is proposed to be enhanced to a more park-like setting. There are no'- Ftr-ee: -or-bushes-on-site 15. Have special precautions been taken tofpreser--ue wildlife hab►tats;natural wildlife food sources, or existing places,or are these being preserved? Response: There are no=identified areas3of significant wildlife habitat on site. The majority of it is • currently farmed for grain crops,which diminishes its habitat value. The open space corridor along Baxter Creek provides minimal habitat for small mammals, birds, and fish. Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 35 • 16. If the project is located within a locally designated historical district or includes a locally designated landmark structure, is the project in conformance with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance? Response: There are rialustor-ic=ordand-mark-st-r-uctures on site. The site is not within a historic district. 17. If the development is proposed onteacisting_agricultuial--la_nd-or-open-spy does=it:meet Masten Plan-objectives-fo--- -r-clustering?-0 Response: The project is in compliance with the Bozeman Area Master Plan and the underlying zoning. It meets cl__ustering-object ves:Lby_pr_o-posing_that_the=boil-dings-be=cl-ustered_away--from_— �Highway_19_1 and sharecommon parking_areas_and_accesses 18. Will the project con:form_to=applicable-local,-state,_and=federal-air-quality-standards;including, but not limited to:odor;dust;fumes or gases which are noxious,toxic or corrosive;suspended,solid or liquid particles; or any air contaminant which may obscure an observer's vision or impair breathing? Response: The project will conform to all local, state and federal air quality standards. Lid--uses, • with-i-n-the=prof-ect will=riot=gene-r-ate_emissions.-D The proposed auto--dealership--in--Lot 1 will be required to adhere to Federal, State and local regulations for disposal=o-f toxic-wastes 19. Will the project conform to applicable local,state and federal water_quality-stardards,including, but not limited to:erosion and sedimentation;runoff control;discharge of solid washes;and discharge of hazardous substances? Response: The project will conform to all local, state and federal water quality standards. All final engineering designs will be in accordance with applicable standards. The=co_v_en is-for the project require all-lot owners to comply with applicable standards. 20. Can the proposed land uses and activities be conducted so thatmoise=generated shall not exceed the minimum performance levels as specified in the City's Noise Control Ordinance,Chapter 18.50 of the Zoning Code? Response: None of the proposed uses will generate noise levels requiring special regulation by Chapter 18.50. 21. If the proposed activity produces glare-or-heat,-whether_d:irect_or reflected;is=theroper is on conducted within an enclosed building or with other effective screening in such a manner as to make such glare or heat completely imperceptible from any point along the property line? • Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 36 • Response: None-of the-,proposed=activ-it-ies produce_glare-or-heat. Parking lot and building lighting will 1 meet City of Bozeman specifications. Lighting is regulated by the Development Guidelines and will be directed downward and onto the site. 22. Will the project cause an inherent or recurring gene arne`ted-vibration--perceptible without instruments at any point along the property line? Response: Vibrations detectable at the property lines wil1l-not-b-e=generated=by the-proposed-=uses. 23. Is the exterior lihting, except for warning, emergency or traffic signals, installed in such a manner that theJight-source-is-obsc.ured_to_prevent-excessive_glare-on-public sstreets and walkways or into any residential area? Response: Parkin lot and building lighting swill-meet Cit of Bozeman s ecifrcaGo-ris. Lighting will g g g g Y P g g be directed downward and onto the site. 24. Will sewage-and=industrial-wastes-be-treated:and=disposed-of-in-such-_a-manner as to comply with applicable local, state,and federal standards? Response: . Sewage will be disposed of through the City of Bozeman sanitary sewer system. No industrial-wastes=are-ro osed-to=be-enefated-b =this "ro ecf=Ajl sewer service connections P _p g Y P J will be monitored by the City's Pre-Treatment Program to insure compliance with the City's discharge criteria. All-Development-Cr-iter-ia=(-Site=Des f n):- -- 25. Are the elements of the site plan(e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping,etc.) arranged on site so that activities are integrated with the organizationalschemeof_the_community_and nei.5labort►ood? Response: Because the surrounding area is largely undeveloped,the site design of this project will help to establish an organizational theme for the area. The proposed roads,sidewalks,open space areas, and trail are intended to integrate with those existing or proposed off site. The proposed=rear-yard-buil_dmi g_treatment=specified in the Development Guidelines will-assure that future-buildmgs are attractiveIrom-alf=sides 26. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space, and landscaping etc.) designed and arranged to produce anreffcient,`-funetio ally anized--and-cohesive--plann`ed-un� development? I Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 37 . Response: The Preliminary Site Plan is deigned to provide func ional=and=aesthet=c-rel_ationships between: parking areas and buildings, pedestrian and vehicular circulation needs, landscaping and buildings,landscaping for screening requirements and pedestrian facilities, and building mass and entryway corridor design guidelines. As a result of this, a cohesive and functional arrangement of land uses will be accomplished. 27. Is the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan(e.g.buildings,circulation,open space, landscaping etc.) in harmony with-the ex.istin natural=topography;natural waterrbodiesand water courses;and existing vegetation? Response: Except for the Baxter Creek water course, the site is featureless. This has been used to provide the dominant-landscape-characte-fistic. The open space corridor along Baxter Creek will bean continuation_of the=corr-idor_begwn_b-y_the"Bill-ion Auto3Plaza P-JD. The open ,space-cor-r-idor=arid=the-streetscape created_by-Competition=Dr-i-ve-provide views.-acro.ss the , property from Highway 191. 28. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation,and placement;transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources,etc.)contribute=to-the-overaCl,redu_ -ction ofenergy-use-by-the-, project? • Response: Design of the pa ik n'g-lots-pedesffian-circulationcorisiderations,and the presence of multiple shopping or service opportunities will enable trip consolidation. Low maintenance--grass-A species (drought resistant) are proposed in the setback areas adjacent to Highway 191. 29. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings,circulation, open space and landscaping etc.) --- —�.� , designed and arranged-to-maximize-the-privacy-by-residents-of-the project? Response: This criteria is not applicable to a commercial subdivision; no re is dent=ialieleme is are proposed. 30. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and is=at=least.3.0_%=of-the-project, exclusive of yard setbacks and parking lot interior landscape,developed as open space? Response: Including-the=1.35saere-park=dedication in Bronken Park, the project will have 30% open space. The dominant landscape feature,the Baxter Creek corridor is the central focus of the open space theme. • 31. Doesgfii-sneet=par-king-system-provide-for the_smooth,safe,_and-con venieat_movement-of vehicles both on and off site? Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 38 • • • Response: Accesses to the east and south are proposed. These in turn will ensure=access�in-ails rdirecttons'diffuse=tr-affcand provide entry-an'd-exist options fo_r-customer-s-maintenance vehicles and delivery vehicles. Future accesses are proposed to the west and north. These in assure integration with future circulation plans in the area. Noon:street parki-ng_will be allowed. The proposed parking,ar-r-angements are simple and efficient 32. Does the development sat-isfyFi6 p rara kinb capacity-requirements-of_the city�and-provide adequate s' space suited=to=the=loading and=unloa`din-g;of persons;materials,and goods? Response: The parking arrangements shown are_adequate-for the_hypoth`etical uses Spedi�parkng, ---- - ----- --s_&§ requirements will be4determined-on_a_case=by case basis when-building_permits_are7 requested. 33. Is the.active=recreational=area-suitab lytocated-and:accessible`-Wthe residential units it is intended to serve and is adequate screening provided to ensure privacy/quiet for neighboring residential uses? Response: This criteria is not applicable to a commercial planned unit development. However, a recreational site appropriatefor-a=commercial-project=is proposed in the open space north of Lot#1. • 34. Is the pedestr_ian-c.irculation-system-designed3o assure t a pedestrians can move safety and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area? Response: The pedestrian circulation system will provide adequate-ci-rculatio-n=on site and connections off site. �F.i_ve foot=s-ide_walks-are proposed on�bothJsi=des=of-Coimpetit ori-L:Dr-ive=The sidewalks adjacent to all open space areas would be installed by the Applicant during initial construction. The sidewalks adjacent to the individual lots will be installed by the lot owners after building construction, but prior to occupancy. cThe=67-fdot wide concrete o� ,(curvi-l=inear)=sidewalk`-within-the-50=foot open--spaee=along Highway 1-91=will=be-i=]stalled dur-ing initial construction-by the App�licaant:1A�tr�=withiri-thd--after•"/C-r,'e`e�c�orrridor will Be installe�l_b_y_the-Applicarit� � �J ��� 0 " �V 35. Is the development being--properly-integrated-into-development an&circulation patterns of jdjacent^and-nearby-neighborhood that this development will not become an isolated"pad"to adjoining developmenf? Response:__- The project is Integra edw`ith the vehicular and pedestrian circulation pattern in the area. 36�oe_s the pedestrian circulation system incorporate design features to —co-men enhance ie ty.nce,safe • and amenity across parking lots-and streets,,-,nC,ud,ng_but-not limited-to;paving patterns,-grade__; differences,landscaping,and lighting? Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 39 Response: The area is nno�t.ant-ab-ic-pated-to generat high le e vl fs-o pedes tiantrafffc'o,� r flict. This was addressed ove. 37. Does the pedestrian and bicycle trail system adequately connect-to the systems in adjacent developments? Response: Other than the trail in the Billion Auto Plaza open space,there arse no" a�d ac nf'systems.This project will help:set-the stagexfor_futu_ r�ee c�culation systems in the area. The project is integrated with the vehicular and pedestrian circulation pattern in the area. 38. Does the landscape plan enhance.the�appearanc of v`.ehicular-use;open=space=and,pedestrian= are&s which contribute to their usage anvisual appearance? Response: The proposed landscaping is4ntended to o ple�rriegt the appearance of the overall project, ribu e o t,hee screeniinnglo�fjthe parking areas, soften the effect of the buildings, and increase the attractiveness of the pedestrian areas, thereby increasing their usage. 39. Does the landscaping plan enhance the-buildings? • Response: The landscaping proposed usesLa-collection o-f indigenous•species;aridisubstitutes.that are hardy in this climate, including evergreen and deciduous species. The indig ous p ies, or their hardier substitutes,are compatible with and complementary to the architectural styles proposed. 40. Does the landscaping,plan-screen-utility-bones par.king adi�ng areas trash&PAtainer , ou s'ide:stor-age=areas;blank walls--or-fences,and.other.areas.ofaow_visual.interest,from�roadways, Pedestrian areas and public view? i Response: The-Deve-lo-pmment;Guidel-ines!-require=total=screening-of all:utility'facilities:a_=id;mechanical (equipment. 41. If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the site planvo d-inte—Wring—withapublic access o-that-afea?:. Response: The site is not adjacent to an existing.or approvedtpublic-park? Pub'1ic-access-wrlFbe provided_aIongthe:Baxter.Creek co irrirr do r. 42. Will--a_ -s_igns,in-the project be-in compliance with-the-provis`io'�ns of the Bozeman sign code? i Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 40 • Response: All�signs_onindividual"buildings will'be i-n-compliarice`with'the'Bozeman sign code and the Development Guidelines. Monu_ment.entry signs will- e rovided"in three:.locattons as shown on the landscaping plan. Design and size details of the monument signs are provided in the Development Guidelines. `Comm rcial PUD:.Requir-ed.Cfiteria: 1. Are all;repaif painting and,body work.activities,including storage of r`ef sie and-vehicular.parts, pland to take lace within an enclosed structure,or- omc pletely-screened frorm off-`site view?--' planned Response: They Development Guidelines=and.t�e Bozeman Zone Code wild require:,,ompliance with _ � . . =y� thesetypeof;screening.requirements.- 2. Have necessary precautions been taken-to-prevent-lubrication hazadous'materials and-fuel,oil substance,-which are stored on site,from Fleaking.odrainng;into the groundwater system;s,1reams, - _ creeks,or other water bodies? Response: The proposed.auto.dealership WiJl have to com ly=with- 6deral State and local regulations for handling and disposal of toxic wastes. 3. If the project contains any use intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment,does it meet the following requirements: Response: Adul&R—usement-or:entertainment�activitie novproposed-7-- 4. Is the project contiguous.to:an.arter-ial=street;and;has-adequate-but-co troeledxacce s been provided? Response: The site has adjacency=to-one-arterialIA,no-access-strip-t-0 Highway 191 is shown on the plat. The proposed access location for Competition Drive to Highway 191 has been approved by MDOT. 5. Is the project-aLleast2'acres of land?j Response: The project site is 17 56 acres,-gross•area. 6. If the project contains two-or mOrr,�gnificannt'uses-(for instance, retail, office, residential, hotel/motel and recreation), do the,,,uses-relate-to each other in terms of,location wiThin the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities,etc.? Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 41 • Response: Lot #1 is anticipated to be used for an auto dealership, uses on all other lots will be ccommercial_or_o.ff ce-in nature. The specific uses will be determined based on the list of permitted uses in the Development Guidelines. All future uses will be required to comply with the Development Guidelines. 7. If the project is a single use PUD development, is it compatible with existing land use patterns? Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? Response: The project will likely not be a single use project. With exception of Billion Auto Plaza,the surrounding area is not developed; it has no development character. This project continues the pattern started with the Billion project and would begin establishing the character of the area to the north and west of the site. Compatibility issues have been addressed previously. 8. Is ther direct-velii lar and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas-and-adjacent or future off-site park�rr,a___cureas which contain more than ten spaces? Response: There are no proposed or existing adjacent parking areas with which to connect. Sidewalks a along Competition Drive and Highway 191 will provide pedestrian access to future developments. • 7 9. Does the projectncourage infill with'at-least one-quarter of its boundary conRiguous to existing—, development`o?does the project otherwise dem-- onstrate compliance with h ne al j use guidelines of --_- the Bozeman Area Master Plan? Response: The project does encourage infill ni terms of land use and infrastructure. The entire east _ boundary is contiguous to existing development. The project is in compliance with the Bozeman Area Master Plan, as amended for the Valley West Annexation, which has determined that the project site is appropriate for commercial uses. 10. If the project includes residential development;-oLis-ad aeent--to`existing or:future-residential develop eent;Nhaveex eepiional-or•unique-design-methods_been-inco j ro ated-to-mitigate the-impacts of`conflicting-land_us.-A(e.g., landscape and architectural design, extensive open space, recreation center(s),maximum traffic efficiency,screening of parking areas)? Response: No residential development is proposed. cF-U ure adjacent res dential:idevei pment—will-be, buffered_b_y_the_building-arehiteefiurai�:treatments.specified in the Development Guidelines, open space and setbacks. 11. Does the project provide:foLoutdoor-recreational-areas-(such as additional landscaped areas, • open spaces,trails or picnic areas)for the use and enjoyment of those living in,working in,or visiting the development? Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 42 Response: The project is commercial and will not generate significant recreational demands. Thirty percent open space is provided. An_ac-tave-recreation_aT--ea=is proposed-adjacent to-Lot-#-l., H A3 l 30\00I\EA-CIS\EA.W PD • , i Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision Environmental Assessment And Community Impact Assessment Page 43 • PART IV BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK PUD DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND COVENANTS (Provided Under Separate Cover By P.C. Development) • i i • 3 BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK DRAFT MARCH 1999 • Draft Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions Draft Design Regulations RECEIVEE BY 999 CJT` DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK This Declaration,made this day of , 1999 by BAXTER CREEK, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company(hereinafter collectively referred to as "Declarant"), is made with reference to the following facts: RECITALS: A. Declarant is the owner of real property in the City of Bozeman, County of Gallatin, State of Montana,to wit:��7 Lots 1 th6ugh 9,�Baxter Creek Business Park, City of Bozeman, accordinz to the 6. icial plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Galin County Clerk and Recorder. B. The Property is being developed as a Business and Commercial vark to be known as the Baxter Creek Business Park. Declarant desires to subject the real property in this center to certain covenants, conditions and restrictions for the benefit of the property, Declarant, and the purchasers of lots in this subdivision. It is intended that said • covenants, conditions and restrictions bind and benefit not only said purchasers and Declarant, but also their respective successors, heirs and assigns and that all lots in this subdivision be held, used, leased, sold and conveyed subject to the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Declaration. C. The requirements set forth in the covenants shall, at all times, meet or exceed the minimum requirements and standards of the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Code of the City of Bozeman, Montana. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Unless the context otherwise specifies or requires, the terms defined in this Article I shall, as used in this Declaration, have the meanings herein set forth: 1.1 Association shall mean the Baxter Creek Owners Association, a Montana nonprofit corporation, and its successors and assigns. "Board of Directors" or"Board" shall mean the duly elected and qualified members of the Board of Directors of the Association. 1.2 Architect/Engineer. "Architect/Engineer" shall mean a person holding a certificate of registration to practice architecture or engineering in the State of Montana. 2 • 1.3. Beneficiary. `Beneficiary" shall mean a Mortgagee under a Mortgage as well as a Beneficiary under a Trust Indenture or Deed of Trust. 1.4 Bylaws. "Bylaws" shall refer to the Bylaws of and for Baxter Creek Owners CJ Association, Inc. 1.5 Common Areas. "Common Areas"shall mean every portion of the Property which is to be maintained by the Association as herein provided including:c(i)-50 foot right-of-ways on Enterprise Drive including boulevard landscape therein; (ii)the surface drainage system and the land and detention pond included in the easements therefore; (ill) a strip of land 50 feet in width along the portion of lots 1, 2 bordering US Highway 191; (iv) Baxter Creek open space comprised of 2 parcels of--1:7:ac-and c65=ac as shown on the plat; (v) all improvements and landscaping on the foregoing properties and all fixtures and appurtenances (except those provided and maintained by the City of Bozeman, such as fire hydrants,traffic signs,etc.)used therewith or attached thereto, and (vi) all tangible and intangible personal property at any time owned or controlled by the Association for the common use and benefit of the Owners. The designation of the foregoing properties is for the purposes of definition only and shall not be construed to create any obligation upon the Declarant or the Association, their successors and assigns, to improve or maintain the said Common Areas. 1.6 Committee for Design Review. "Committee for Design Review"of the Baxter Creek Business Park is established to coordinate, expedite, and assure fair and equitable implementation of the Design Regulations. • 1.7 Declarant. "Declarant"shall mean the Baxter Creek LLC,and to the extent provided in Article X of this Declaration, their successors and assigns. 1.8 Declaration. "Declaration"shall mean this Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions for the Baxter Creek Business Park, as it may from time to time be amended or supplemented. 1.9 Design Regulations. "Design Regulations"shall mean design regulations which may from time to time be adopted and published by Declarant to set forth procedures for review of plans and standards and criteria which Declarant expects to follow in reviewing proposed developments within the Property. 1.10 Creeks or Waterways. "Creeks or waterways" shall mean Baxter Creek waterway constituting a part of the storm drainage retention system for the Property, including any permanent ponds, surface creeks and underground conduits connecting ponds, which will be more specifically described on the easement exhibit to be recorded pursuant to section 6.1 hereof. 1.11 Improvement - Improvements. "Improvement" or "improvements" shall include buildings, outbuildings, roads, driveways, parking areas, fences, screening walls and carriers, retaining walls, stairs, decks, water lines, sewers, electrical and gas distribution facilities, hedges, • windbreaks, plantings, planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, loading areas and all other structures, 3 installations and landscaping of every type and kind, whether above or below the land surface. • 1.12 Lot. "Lot"shall mean a fractional part of the Property as subdivided on subdivision maps recorded from time to time in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.13 Mortgage. "Mortgage" shall mean a Trust Indenture or Deed of Trust, as well as a Mortgage. 1.14 Mort ag eee. "Mortgagee" shall mean a Beneficiary under, or holder of, a Trust Indenture or Deed of Trust, as well as a Mortgagee under a Mortgage. 1.15 Occupant. "Occupant" shall mean a lessee or licensee of an Owner, or any other person or entity other than an Owner in lawful possession of a Lot with the permission of the Owner. 1.16 Owner. "Owner" shall mean any person or entity which is the record Owner of fee simple title to any entity or person who holds such interest as security for the payment of an obligation, other than a contract seller, Mortgagee, or other security holder, in actual possession of a lot. 1.17 Pro e . "Property shall mean and refer to the property described on Exhibit"A", together with such additions as may hereafter be annexed thereto by Declarant in accordance with the terms hereof. 1.8 Record - Recorded - Recordation. "Record", "recorded", or "recordation", shall mean,with respect to any document, the recordation of said document in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. 1.9 Sisn. "Sign"shall mean any structure,device or contrivance, electric or non electric, upon or within which any poster, bill, bulletin, printing, lettering, painting, device or other advertising of any kind whatsoever is used, placed, posted, tacked, nailed, pasted or otherwise fastened or affixed. 1.20 Street or Streets. "Street" or "streets" shall mean any street, highway, road, or thoroughfare within or adjacent to the Property and shown on any recorded subdivision plat, or record or survey, whether designated thereon as street, avenue or road. 1.21 Trust Indenture. "Trust Indenture" shall mean a Mortgage or Deed of Trust, as well as a Trust Indenture. 1.22 Visible from NeighboringProperty. "Visible from neighboring property"shall mean, with respect to any given object on a Lot, that such object is or would be visible to a person six (6) feet tall, standing on any part of any adjacent Lot or other property at an elevation no greater than the elevation of the object being viewed. 4 • ARTICLE II SUBJECT PROPERTY 2.1 General Declaration. Declarant hereby declares that all of the Property more particularly described in the recitals above, shall be conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, occupied,built upon or otherwise used, improved or transferred in whole or in part, subject to this Declaration. All of the covenants,conditions and restrictions set forth herein are declared and agreed to be in furtherance of a general plan for the subdivision, improvement and sale of the Property and are established for the purpose of enhancing and protecting the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Property and every part thereof. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions shall run with all of the Property for all purposes and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Declarant and all Owners,Occupants,and their successors in interest as set forth in this Declaration. 2.2 Subdivision of Lots. No lots within the Baxter Creek Business Park shall be subdivided without the consent of the Declarant or Association. Any Declarant or Association approved subdivision of lots must further comply with requirements and procedures set forth in the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations amended plat process. ARTICLE III DESIGN, APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS 3.1 Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions Including Design Regulations for Baxter Creek Business Park are hereby adopted as Appendix I to these covenants and herein incorporated by reference and shall be deemed covenants running with and binding the real property described above. ARTICLE IV REGULATION OF OPERATIONS AND USES 4.1 Permitted Uses. The allowable uses of each lot shall be determined by the Baxter Creek Master Plan as described in section I.B.3. of the Covenants, Conditions&Restrictions including Design Regulations in Appendix I hereto. 4.2 Nuisances. No nuisance shall be permitted to exist or operate upon any Lot so as to be offensive or detrimental to any adjacent Lot, or property or to its occupants. A"nuisance" shall include, but not be limited to, conditions specifically def ned�by the-Guidelines relating to air or water pollution, radiation, noise and ground vibration. 4.3 Waterways. The Owner or Occupant of any Lot shall at all times conduct its use and activities in a manner that will preserve the integrity of waterways within the Common Area including the prevention of any degradation of water quality, any reduction or increase in the flow 5 of said waterways, any damage to the stream bed or banks of said waterways. The Owner or Occupant of any Lot shall not conduct or permit the conduct of the following activities: (a) The discharge of any liquid, solid, or gas into waterways; (b) The use of any fertilizers or herbicides other than those specifically approved by Declarant; or the polluting of waterways; or (c) Any refuse encouraging activities. 4.4 Condition of Propei1y. The Owner and Occupant of any Lot shall at all times keep it and the buildings, improvements and appurtenances thereon in a safe, clean and wholesome condition and comply, at its own expense, in all respects with all applicable governmental, health, fire and safety ordinances,regulations,requirements and directives and the Owner or Occupant shall at regular and frequent intervals remove at its own expense any rubbish of any character whatsoever that may accumulate upon such Lot. 4.5 Maintenance of Grounds. Each Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of all parking areas, driveways,walkways and landscaping on his Lot. Such maintenance and repair shall include, without limitation: (a) Maintenance of all parking areas,driveways and walkways in a clean and safe condition, including the paving and repairing or resurfacing of such areas when necessary with the type of material originally installed thereon or such substitute therefore as shall, in all respects,be equal thereto in quality, appearance and durability; the removal of debris and waste material and the washing and sweeping of paved areas as required; painting and repainting of striping markers and directional signals as required; (b) Cleaning,maintenance and relamping of any external lighting fixtures except such fixtures as may be the property of any public utility or government body; and (c) Performance of all necessary maintenance of all landscaping including the trimming,watering and fertilization of all grass, ground cover, shrubs or trees, removal of dead or waste materials, replacement of any dead or diseased grass, ground cover, shrubs or trees. Nothing contained herein shall preclude an Owner from recovering from any person liable for damages to which such Owner might be entitled for any act or omission or act requiring an expenditure by the Owner or the maintenance and repair of the parking area, driveway, walkway and/or landscaping on his lot. (d) Unless the Owner or Occupant personally performs the maintenance required hereunder, each owner and occupant shall contract with the Declarant, the Association, or other contractor for performance of all landscaping and parking lot maintenance required hereby, and shall keep continuously on file with Declarant and/or Association a copy of the current maintenance agreements. 6 4.6 Remedies for Failure to Maintain and Repair. (a) Remedies. If any Owner shall fail to perform the maintenance and repair required by Section 4.5,then Declarant and/or Association, after fifteen days prior written notice to such delinquent Owner, shall have the right,but not the obligation,to perform such maintenance and repair and to charge the delinquent Owner with the cost of such work together with interest thereon at an annual rate equal to the maximum rate allowed under Montana law from the date of Declarant's and/or Association's advancement of funds for such work to the date of reimbursement of Declarant and/or Association by Owner. If the delinquent Owner shall fail to reimburse Declarant and/or Association for such costs and such costs shall remain unpaid for three months, Declarant and/or Association may file for and record a claim of lien signed by Declarant and/or Association for the amount of such charge together with interest thereon. The lien created by this section shall be effective to establish a lien against the interest of the delinquent Owner in his Lot together with interest at the rate provided above on the amount of such advance from the date thereof, in addition to recording fees,costs of title search obtained in connection with such lien or the foreclosure thereof and court costs and reasonable attorney's fees which may be incurred in the enforcement of such a lien. (b) Foreclosure of Lien. Subject to the provisions of Article XIII, such a lien when so established against the Lot described in said claim,shall be prior or superior to any right, title, interest, lien or claim which may be or may have been acquired in or attached to the real property interests subject to the lien subsequent to the time of filing this Declaration. Such lien shall be for the benefit of Declarant and/or Association and may be enforced and foreclosed in a like manner as a real estate mortgage is foreclosed in the State of Montana. (c) Cure. If a default to which a notice of claim was filed is cured, Declarant and/or Association shall file or record a rescission of such notice,upon payment by the defaulting Owner of the cost of preparing and filing or recording such rescission, and other reasonable costs, interest or fees which have been incurred. (d) Nonexclusive Remedy. The foregoing lien and the rights to foreclose thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in substitution for, all other rights and remedies which any party may have hereunder and by law, including any suit to recover a money judgement for unpaid assessments. If any Owner shall fail to perform such maintenance and repair and,notwithstanding such failure,Declarant and/or Association should fail to exercise its right and remedies hereunder, then,the Association, any other Owner, shall have the right, but not the obligation, to perform such maintenance and repair and shall have the same rights and remedies with respect thereto as are provided herein to the Declarant and/or Association. 4.7 Refuse Collection Areas. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be visually screened so as not to be visible from neighboring property or streets. No refuse collection area shall be permitted between a street and the front of a building. • 4.8 Repair of Buildings. No building or structure upon any Lot shall be permitted to fall 7 • into disrepair, and each such building and structure shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair and adequately painted or otherwise finished. 4.9 Public Utilities. Declarant and/or Association reserves the right to grant consents for the construction and operation of public utilities including, but not limited to inter-urban or rapid transit, lines for electricity, telephone or telegraph, above or below ground conduits, and gas pipes in and upon any and all streets now existing or hereafter established upon which any portion of the Property may now or hereafter front or abut. Declarant and/or Association reserves the right to grant consents and to petition the proper authorities for any and all street improvements such as grading, seeding,tree planting, sidewalks,paving, sewer and water installation, whether it be on the surface or subsurface, which in the opinion of Declarant and/or Association are necessary on or to the Property. The City of Bozeman shall approve the designs and construction of all public utility improvements within the Baxter Creek Business Park. 4.10. Utility Lines and Antennas. No sewer, drainage, or utility lines or wires or other devices for the communication or transmission of electric current, power, or signals including telephone, television, microwave or radio signals, shall be constructed, placed or maintained anywhere in or upon any portion of the property other than within buildings or structures unless the same shall be contained in conduits or cables constructed, places or maintained underground or concealed in or under buildings or other structures. No antenna for the transmission or reception of telephone; television, microwave or radio signals shall be placed on any Lot within the Property without the prior written approval of Declarant and/or Association. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to forbid the erection or use of temporary power or telephone facilities incidental to the construction or repair of buildings on the Property. 4.11 Mechanical Equipment. All mechanical equipment,utility meters, storage tanks, air conditioning equipment and similar items shall be screened with landscaping or attractive architectural features integrated into the structure itself. 4.12 Mineral Exploration. No portion of the Property shall be used in any manner to explore for or to remove any steam, heat, oil, or other hydrocarbons, gravel, earth or any earth substances or other minerals of any kind, provided, however, that this shall not prevent the excavation of earth in connection with the grading or construction of improvements within the Property. Water may be extracted by Declarant and/or Association to the extent permitted by the appropriate governmental agency. 4.13 Other Operations and Uses. Operations and uses which are neither specifically prohibited nor specifically authorized by this Declaration may be permitted in a specific case if operational plans and specifications are submitted to and approved in writing by the Declarant and/or Association in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article III and Article IV of this Declaration. Approval or disapproval of such operational plans and specifications shall be based upon the effect of such operations or uses on other property subject to this Declaration or upon the Occupants thereof,but shall be in the sole discretion of the Declarant and/or Association. Any such approval shall be subject to the review and approval of the proper local authorities in the City of 8 • Bozeman and Gallatin County. ARTICLE V EASEMENTS 5.1 Reservation of Easements. Declarant and/or Association hereby reserves easements over and across the Property for the following purposes: (a) To install, maintain, operate,repair and replace the storm drainage retention system for the Property, including all pumps, motors,pipes and culverts, filters, screens, and other equipment used in connection therewith, and the beds and banks of any creek, pond or waterway constituting a part of the storm drainage system. The location of the easement for the storm drainage retention system and waterways is more specifically described and depicted on the recorded plat filed in the records of Gallatin County, Montana. Declarant and/or Association reserves the right to amend and relocate portions of the easement reserved by this paragraph within Lots then owned by Declarant and/or Association at any time,by recording an amended easement exhibit, certified as such by the Declarant and/or Association which amendment shall be approved by the City of Bozeman. (b) To maintain landscaping and the landscaping irrigation system installed within the Common Areas, including watering, mowing, trimming, pruning, fertilizing, mulching and replacing trees, shrubs, ground covers and other planting materials. ARTICLE VI BAXTER CREEK OWNERS ASSOCIATION 6.1 Creation. The Association shall be created and empowered pursuant to the Articles and Bylaws when Declarant has conveyed three lots, until such time Declarant shall have all the authority vested in the Association. 6.2 Purpose of Association. The Association has been formed as a non-profit corporation in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title 35, Montana Code Annotated for the purpose of enforcing these covenants and operating the Association for the benefit of all members therein. 6.3 Bylaws of and for Association. The Bylaws of and for Baxter Creek Owners Association, Inc. establish membership in and the duties, powers, operations, and rights of the Association and the members therein. The Association shall be governed by and empowered to act in accordance with the Bylaws. 6.4 Membership in Association. Every person, group of persons, partnership, corporation, or association who is a fee owner of real property within the boundaries of the area described as Baxter Creek Subdivision on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, shall be a member of the Association. By this provision, 9 • each tract as shown on the plat and amendments thereto shall entitle the owner of one membership interest in the Association. Multiple owners of a. single parcel of real property would have collectively one such membership or voting interest. If more than one tract is owned,the owner or owners thereof would have one membership or voting interest for each separate parcel of real property. Membership interest shall run with the land so that said interest is an incident to ownership beginning when ownership rights are acquired and terminating when such rights are divested. Accordingly, no member shall be expelled, nor shall he be permitted to withdraw or resign while possessing a membership interest. 6.5 Assessments. The Association,acting through the Board of Directors, shall have the power to levy assessments on its members. The Bylaws of and for Baxter Creek Owners Association,Inc. establishes the procedures and basis upon which assessments are made. Reference is made thereto. 6.6 Budgets. The Bylaws of and for Baxter Creek Owners Association establishes the authority and procedure for the establishment of budgets for the Association. 6.7 Liens. Liens for unpaid assessments may be foreclosed in the manner as a mortgage on real property and the Association shall be entitled in any such foreclosure proceedings to recover its court costs, expenses, and reasonable attomey's. The Bylaws establishes the authority and procedure for liens. 6.8 Indemnification. Each officer, director, and former officer and director of the Association shall be indemnified by the Association against all expenses and liabilities, including attorney's fees,reasonably incurred by or imposed upon him in any proceeding to which he may be a party, or in which he may become involved by reason of his being or having been an officer or director of the Association, or any settlement thereof, whether or not he is an officer or director at the time such expenses are incurred, except in such cases wherein such office,director or committee member is adjudged guilty if willful malfeasance in the performance of his duties. The Association may procure and maintain insurance against such liabilities, or such kind and amount as its Board of Directors may approve. of ARTICLE VII MODIFICATION AND REPEAL 7.1 Procedure. Except as otherwise provided in Section 8.2, this Declaration or�any provision hereof, or any covenant, condition or restriction contained herein, may be terminated, extended, modified or otherwise amended, as to the whole of the subject property or any portion thereof, with the written consent of the Owners of fifty-one percent(51%)of the Property,provided, however, that so long as Declarant owns at least twenty percent (20%) of the property subject to • 10 • • • these covenants, conditions and restrictions, or for a period of twenty(20) years from the effective date hereof, whichever period is shorter, no such termination, extension, modification or other amendment shall be effective without the written approval of Declarant, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. No such termination,extension, modification or other amendment shall be effective until a proper instrument in writing has been executed, acknowledged and recorded. ARTICLE VIR ENFORCEMENT 8.1 Abatement and Suite. The Owner of each Lot shall be primarily liable, and the Occupant, if any, secondarily liable for the violation or breach of any covenant, condition, or restriction herein contained. Violation or breach of any covenant, condition or restriction herein contained shall give to Declarant,or the Association,following thirty(30)days written notice to the Owner or Occupant in question except in existing circumstances, the right, privilege and license to enter upon the Lot where said violation or breach exists and to abate and remove summarily,or abate or remove, at the expense of the Owner or Occupant thereof, any improvement, structure, thing or condition that may be or exist thereon contrary to the intent and meaning of the provisions hereof, or to prosecute a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons who have violated or are attempting to violate any of these covenants, conditions or restrictions to enjoin or prevent them from doing so,to cause said violation to be remedied, or to recover damages for said violation. No such entry by Declarant, the Association or their agents shall be deemed a trespass, and neither Declarant nor the Association nor their agents shall be subject to liability to the Owner or Occupant of said Lot for such entry and any action taken to remedy or remove a violation. The cost of any abatement, remedy or removal hereunder shall be a binding personal obligation or any Owner or Occupant in violation of any provision of this Declaration, as well as a lien(enforceable in the same manner as a mortgage) upon the Lot in question. The lien provided for in this section shall not be valid as against a bona fide purchaser or mortgagee for value of the Lot in question unless a suit to enforce said lien shall have been filed in a court of record in Gallatin County, Montana, prior to the recordation of the deed or mortgage conveying or encumbering the Lot in question to such purchase or mortgagee, respectively. 8.2 Right of Entry. During reasonable hours and upon reasonable notice, and subject to reasonable security requirements, Declarant, the Association or their agents, shall have the right to enter upon and inspect any Lot and the Improvements thereon covered by this Declaration for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the provisions of this Declaration have been or are being complied with, and neither Declarant nor the Association nor their agents shall be deemed to have committed a trespass or their wrongful act by reason of such entry or inspection. 8.3 Deemed to Constitute a Nuisance. The result of every act or omission whereby any covenant,condition or restriction herein contained is violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be and to constitute a nuisance, and every remedy allowed by law or in equity against an Owner or Occupant either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result any may be exercised by Declarant or the Association. Il • 8.4 Attorney's Fees. In any legal or equitable proceeding for the enforcement of this Declaration or any provision hereof, whether it be an action for damages, declaratory relief or injunctive relief, or any other action, the losing party or parties shall pay the attorney's fees of the prevailing party or parties, in such reasonable amount as shall be fixed by the court in such proceedings or in a separate action brought for that purpose. The prevailing party shall be entitled to said attorney's fees even though said proceeding is settled prior to judgment. All remedies provided herein or at law or in equity shall be cumulative and not exclusive. 8.5 Failure to Enforce is No Waiver. The failure of Declarant and/or Association to enforce any requirement,restriction or standard herein contained shall in no event:be deemed to be a waiver of the right to do so thereafter or in other cases, nor of the right to enforce any other restriction. ARTICLE IX ASSIGNMENT Any and all of the rights, powers and reservations of Declarant herein contained may be assigned to any person, partnership, corporation or association which will assume the duties of Declarant pertaining to the particular rights,powers and reservations assigned, and upon any such person, partnership, corporation or association evidencing its consent in writing to accept such assignment and assume such duties, he or it shall, to the extent of such assignment, have the same right and powers and be subject to the same obligation and duties as are given to and assumed by Declarant herein. If at any time Declarant ceases to exist and has not made such an assignment, a successor to Declarant may be appointed in the same manner as this Declaration may be modified or amended under Section 7.1. Any assignment or appointment made under this article shall be in reasonable form and shall be Recorded. ARTICLE X CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND ACCEPTANCE Every person or entity who now or hereafter owns, occupies or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Property is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every covenant, condition and restriction contained herein, whether or not any reference to this Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Property. ARTICLE XI WAIVER Neither Declarant or the Association nor their successors or assigns shall be liable to any Owner or Occupant of the Property by reason of any mistake in judgment,negligence, nonfeasance, action or inaction or for the enforcement or failure to enforce any provision of this Declaration. Every Owner or Occupant of any said property by acquiring its interest therein agrees that it will not bring any action or suit against Declarant and/or the Association to recover any such damages or to seek equitable relief because of same. • 12 1 ARTICLE XII RUNS WITH LAND All covenants, conditions, restrictions and agreements herein contained are made for the direct, mutual and reciprocal benefit of each and every lot of the Property; shall create equitable servitude upon each Lot in favor of every other Lot; shall create reciprocal rights and obligations between respective Owners and Occupants of all Lots and privity of contract and estate between all grantees of said Lots,their heirs, successors and assigns; and shall, as to the Owner and Occupant of each Lot, his heirs, successors and assigns, operate as covenants running with the land, for the benefit of all other lots, except as provided otherwise herein. ARTICLE XIII CAPTIONS The captions of articles and sections herein are used for convenience only and are not intended to be a part of this Declaration or in any way to define,limit or describe the scope and intent of the particular article or section to which they refer. ARTICLE XIV SEVERABILITY If any part, term or provision of these covenants is held to be illegal or unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions shall not be affected. DECLARANT: BAXTER CREEK LLC By Title: STATE OF ) :ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 1999,before the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared known to me to be the of Baxter Creek LLC that executed this instrument on behalf of said LLC, and acknowledged to me that such LLC executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Residing at My commission expires: 13 • • • i i • o • .z -DRAFT- DESIGN REGULATIONS • BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK March 1999 • PE_CEIVE D BY APR 0 6 1999 t . / TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 I. GENERAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A. Committee for Design Review(CDR) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. General Regulations & Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 H. SITE DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 12 A. Site Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 B. Utilities and Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 C. Landscaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 III. BUILDING DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A. Building Height . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 B. Roof Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 C. Wall Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 IV. MATERIALS AND DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A. Roof Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 B. Exterior Wall Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 • C. Exterior Windows and Doors. : : : :: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . 26 D. Porches and Balconies . 27 E. Building Color . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 F. Energy Conservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 V. FIRE PROTECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . 39� VI. SIGN REGULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 VII. CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 28 VIII. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLISTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 • INTRODUCTION Overview The Baxter Creek Business Park("Baxter Creek")establishes a clearly defined threshold into the City of Bozeman from the western edge of town. The development provides an opportunity for businesses to market local goods and services in highly visible locations,with unified traffic access. The building forms within the development shall be derived from the simple form and character of many of the clusters of farm and ranch buildings along Huffine Lane and elsewhere throughout the Gallatin Valley. The buildings shall acknowledge the basic proportions of wall and roof materials,window and door openings,and major roofs forms found within the surrounding farm and ranch community. The orientation of the major roof forms shall be varied from one building to the next, and further complemented by dormers and porches in order to reinforce the sense of a cluster of common buildings serving different purposes. The buildings shall be linked by a common palette of materials and color options that allow for variety within carefully defined constraints. Each building,public space, sign, landscape element,parking lot, drive, sidewalk, and trail within the Baxter Creek Business Park shall contribute to the theme, integrity and rural character of the development. This design theme philosophy can be creatively applied to the various uses and • functions within Baxter Creek. Purpose of Design Regulations The purpose of this document is to assist Lot and Building owners in the Baxter Creek Business Park by providing a framework for design, construction and maintenance that will allow each project to contribute to the long term goal of creating a development that compliments and i enhances the sense of arrival to the City of Bozeman. The intent of this document is to outline appropriate architectural elements that reflect the specific theme of Baxter Creek while adapting to common design solutions. This document also explains the rules and restrictions that are intended to protect the property values within. Submittal & Review Process The design review process must be followed for any of the following: i. Construction of any building ii. Renovation, expansion, or refinishing of the exterior of any building. 3 iii. Interior changes which affect the major function of a building. iv. Major landscape, road or parking changes. V. Exterior lighting changes. In addition to meeting the requirements of these Design Regulations, an owner must comply with the requirements of all governing agencies including the City of Bozeman and the State of Montana in order to obtain a building permit, Certificate of Occupancy, Temporary Certificate of Occupancy or similar occupancy approval. The Baxter Creek Design Review Process has two steps: Sketch Plan Review and Final Plan Approval. In addition, the owner may appeal the CDR's decision to the Baxter Creek Owner's Association. 1. Sketch Plan Review The Sketch Plan Review addresses the conceptual design of the project. The review will address existing site conditions and planned improvements,building floor plans and elevations, roof design, architectural character or expression, exterior materials, grading and drainage. See Sketch Plan Review Checklists and Evaluation Criteria for complete submission requirements. The Sketch Plan Review includes the following steps: a. The Owner shall have an architect prepare and submit to the CDR two copies of the Sketch Plan which will include all information required by the Sketch Plan Review Checklist. b. CDR reviews the Sketch Plan at the scheduled meeting and notifies owner in writing of the findings within 7 days. C. If necessary the Owner may resubmit a Sketch Plan or appeal to the Owner's Association within thirty days. 2. Final Plan Review & Approval The Final Plan Review and Approval addresses the final design details of the project. The review will address planned improvements, building elevations, building sections, roof design, architectural character or expression, exterior materials, site conditions, grading, drainage and erosion control measures. See Final Plan Review Checklists and Evaluation Criteria for complete submission requirements. The Final Plan Review &Approval includes the following steps: a. Upon approval of the Sketch Plan the owner shall have an architect prepare and submit two copies of the Final Plan which shall include all information required by the final Plan 4 Review Checklist. b. CDR will notify owner in writing of the Final Plan Approval decision within 10 days. C. Upon issuance of a stamped Final Plan Approval, owner may apply for a building permit from the appropriate governing authorities. If the building complies with the Master Plan as approved by the City of Bozeman, only an in-house review by City Planning, Water, Fire-,%andd Building Departments shall be required. �� �,'�'" c� V GENERAL INFORMATION eT These Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions including Design Regulations for Baxter Creek Business Park are made and executed this day of , 1999, by the undersigned, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarant." The real property which is the subject of these Covenants, Condition's aid Restrictions including Design Regulations for Baxter Creek referred to as Lots I through 9 according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Gallatin County"Cler-k=a95IRecorder. It is the intent of the Declarant that these Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions including Design Regulations for Baxter Creek shall be and are perpetual in duration and shall run with and bind the real property described above and be a benefit thereto and shall be enforceable by the individual owners of real property within the subdivision above referenced as well as be enforced- by other entities hereinafter designated. These Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions including Design Regulations for Baxter Creek ma'�y .beAfr-eely3amended;and�modified�bythDeclarantuntil,such time as 2/3 of the tracts within the subdivision have been transferred to third party owners other than the Declarant. Any amendment by the Declarant prior to the transfer or conveyance of six tracts shall not require the consent, approval or consideration of any other owner within the subdivision. From and after the transfer or conveyance of the seventh tract within the subdivision, these Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions including Design Regulations may only be modified with the written consent of at least eighty percent(80%) of the owners of the tracts within the subdivision with each tract being entitled one(1)vote. Notwithstanding the foregoing as provided for hereafter,certain covenants,conditions, restrictions and regulations may not be modified or amended except with the consent and approval of the City Commission for the City of Bozeman, Montana. A. Committee for Design Review (CDR) I. Authority The Baxter Creek Committee for Design Review (CDR) is given authority through the 5 • General Declaration for Baxter Creek. The CDR shall acct in addition to, and.not in lieu of the Bozeman City Commission, Bozeman City-County Planning Board, the Development Review Committee and the Design Review Board. The Bozeman City Commission, City-County Planning Board, DRC & DRB, are not however, appeal boards for the CDR. 2. Committee Organization &Make-up. The committee will be the responsibility of the developer until all lots are sold and plans approved. The developer may transfer the committee responsibility to the Owners Association. The Owners Association shall then be responsible for appointing members and terms. The CDR shall then consist of three members of the Owners Association or may be the same as the Owners Association. The CDR shall modify when necessary and enforce the design regulations related to the external design, appearance, and location of all specified properties and improvements within the Baxter Creek Business Park. 3. Purpose. The CDR is established to coordinate, expedite and assure fair and equitable implementation of the Design Regulations. The objective of the CDR is to encourage development quality that will enhance the built environment. 4. Duties. The CDR is responsible for administering the Design Regulations and performing the following duties: a. To form such reasonable rules and by-laws and adopt such procedures as it deems necessary to carry out its functions. b. To review all of the following it deems necessary: i. Site plans & site sections ii. Landscape plans iii. Building drawings &specifications iv. Material & color samples V. Other information C. To require all improvements,such as the following,to be reviewed and approved by the CDR before construction commences: • 6 • i. Construction of buildings ii. Alterations & remodeling iii. Restorations iv. Landscaping, fences &walls V. Parking vi. Signs & exterior lighting vii. Other improvements d. To enforce height requirements contained within the Design Regulations and to designate such requirements where they are not called out. e. To reject materials, designs and colors submitted with the plans, and the plans themselves, if they are not compatible or are inappropriate with the overall plan of the development. f. To grant variances to the Design Regulations as it deems appropriate. g. To interpret Design Regulations as it deems appropriate and make rulings thereon. h. To insist upon the completion of all improvements in substantial compliance with the approved plans and specifications. i. To enforce the Design Regulations in a court of law. j. To revoke or suspend approvals and order the suspension or cessation of any construction in violation of the Design Regulations or any approval issued by the CDR. k. To require that reasonable fees be paid for the review and approval of building plans and specifications. 1. To require the submission of landscape plans with all requests for review and approval of building plans. 5. Liability. Neither the CDR nor any member thereof shall be liable to the Association or to any Owner for any damage, loss or prejudice suffered or claimed on account of the following: a. The approval of any plans, drawings or specifications, whether or not defective. b. The construction or performance of any work, whether or not pursuant to approved plans, drawings, or specifications.. C. The development or manner of development of any property within the Baxter Creek 7 Business Park. B. General Regulations & Codes 1. General Regulations The rules and regulations described in this document are intended to supplement City, County, State and Federal rules and regulations governing the zoning, construction and use of buildings and property. In addition to these Design Regulations, building design will be regulated by County, State and Federal regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. The Owner or his or her agent shall be responsible to ensure conformance with any applicable regulations, and should check with the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, and State of Montana Building Codes Division to verify that the most recently adopted edition of any applicable regulation is being used. No lot owner shall knowingly violate any such rule or regulation. t 2. Zoning Regulations. The Baxter Creek Business Park shall be-consistent�withithe=Zoning�Ordinance�of_the_Ci of Bozeman. No construction of, or alteration to, any improvements, whether temporary or permanent, including but not necessarily limited to buildings,fences,walls,earthwork,paving,vegetation,signs, or secondary structures such as utility or trash enclosures and storage tanks shall be commenced on any lot prior to receiving the written approval of the CDR. Interior modifications and/or improvements that do not alter the use, exterior appearance of a building,or the site improvements, shall not require the approval of the CDR, and shall require a City of Bozeman Building Permit. 3. Allowable uses, building envelopes, maximum footprints & setbacks, hours of operation. a. Allowable Uses. The allowable uses of each lot shall be determined by the Baxter Creek Master Plan provided, however, that any owner shall not be prevented from leasing any building or lot from time, subject, however, to all of the restrictions as may be adopted from time to time by the Owner's Association. b. Business Park Permitted U e''s`*Allowed on All Lots. C. Permissible Uses for Lots-9 are as follows: V `Antique shop and store t/Apparel and accessory store i 8 Art gallery Art supply stores• Audio-visual equipment sales and rental Automobile or boat sales and/or rental service Auto supply store Bakery for on-site sales, less than 4,000 sf Banks and other financial institutions • Barbershops P' Beauty parlor` Bicycle sales, service and repair shop Book and stationery store ' Business and office machine sales, service and repair shop Candy and ice cream store Cigar and tobacco store Clothing and costume sales and rental shop Gam► Custom dressmaking, furrier,millinery or tailor shop employing five persons or less Dancing or theatrical studio "i Delicatessen and catering establishment Department store • Drugstores ' Dry goods and notion store • Dry cleaning and laundry establishment for drop off/pickup service Essential services (Type n Equipment sales and service Florist Frozen food storage and locker rental o Furniture store Garden supply store, indoor sales only Gift shop • Hardware store, no exterior storage e Health and exercise center • Hobby and coin shop Hunting and finishing supply store a Interior decorator's shop o Jewelry and metal craft store • Laundromat, self-service Leather goods and luggage store Lock and key shop z;- - Mail order catalog store Medical, dental or health clinic Medical and orthopedic appliance store o Messenger or telegraph service station Mortuary a 9 • Museum • Music and instrument sales, service &repair shop Music or dance studio • Newspaper office • Newsstand ° Nursery,plant • Offices (as defined in this title) Office supply and office equipment store Optician Paint and wallpaper store • Pawn shop ° Personal and convenience services • Pet shop • Pet grooming shop Photographic equipment and supply store Photographic studio 0 Picture frame shop ° Public buildings •�' Radio or television sales, with/without service and repair • Radio and television studio, without transmission towers • Research laboratories r Secondhand stores • • Sewing machine store • Shoe store ft Shoe repair and shoeshine shop c Sporting and athletic goods store • Tailor shop, less than five employees o Toy store Travel agency ° i Upholstery shops(excluding on-site upholstery service for cars,boats,trailers,trucks, and other motorized vehicles requiring overnight storage) Variety store P Wallpaper store • Watch repair shop • Wholesale establishments that use samples, but do not stock on premises `C—ondtonal Uses • Amusement and recreational activities Automobile repair facilities Automobile service stations Automobile washing establishments, drive-through Automobile washing establishments, self service Building materials sales Business, technical or vocational school 10 • Day care center Essential services (Type 11) Mortuaries Recreational vehicle sales and/or rental Retail uses in addition to those principle uses listed Tennis and racquet clubs v Veterinary clinics s Wholesale distributors with on-premise retail outlets, providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises. s Any use approy- as part of a planned unit development subject to the provisions of Chxxter'18.54. d. Building Envelope. Each building site shall have a building envelope surveyed and located on the site. The relocation of any building envelope shall require a full site plan review by the DRC, DRB, City/County Planning Board and City Commission. All portions of the building, including interior space, service areas, porches and terraces shall be contained within the building envelope. Automobile canopies for gasoline,motel-and=banking-purposes shall be permitted outside of the Building Envelope, subject to approval of the CDR, and provided that such canopies are not placed within any required setbacks. e. Maximum Footprints. Maximum building area footprints of all buildings have been determined by City of Bozeman parking requirements, and have been designated for each lot in the Baxter Creek Business Park Master Plan. Maximum building area footprints definesmaxvnuni gr-ound`l ve elkarea only, the shape_of:lthe=footprint-may-vary-frvm that defined on the Baxter Creek Business Park Master Plan. Maximum footprints shall include all portions of the building, including interior space, service areas and porches. f. Setbacks Within the Building Envelope. All yards facing public or private streets shall have setbacks for front yards, for side and rear yards, as noted on the Master Plan. Areas of active use and noise shall be buffered from adjacent properties. Additional setbacks from roads,sidewalks, common open space easements and utility easements shall be enforced by the CDR. 4. Codes. All construction must comply with the provisions of the latest edition of the following design regulations, codes and their amendments. - Baxter Creek Business Park Design Regulations - Protective Covenants of Baxter Creek Business Park - Bozeman Zoning Ordinance - Bozeman Fire Department 11 • • • -Uniform Building Code -National Electrical Code -Uniform Mechanical Code -Uniform Plumbing Code -Uniform Fire Code -Uniform Sign Code -Montana Energy Code - And all other applicable City, County, State and Federal Regulations 5. Professional Services. All design and construction documents shall be prepared by a licensed architect and appropriate engineering consultants. 6. Improvements Agreement. At the time of application or for a City of Bozeman Building Permit application, each lot owner shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site and perimeter improvements, as shown on the Final Site Plan. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement. If occupancy of the structure or commencement of the use is to occur prior to the installation of all improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the lot owner within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. II. SITE DEVELOPMENT A. Site Features 1. Access Drives. Access to the development and to individual lots shall be established in the Master Plan. Drives shall be constructed of asphalt or concrete. Any other material shall be approved by the CDR. Where common points of access are indicated in the Master Plan, lot owners shall be required to match the grade and thickness of the adjacent paving materials. 2. Vision Triangles. Drive approach and public street intersection sight triangles shall be free of fences,walls and planting in excess of thirty inches above the street centerline grade. Sight triangles are measured 12 from the curb lines. Sight triangles shall be 50 feet for intersections with arterial streets (Huffine Lane),40 feet for collector and local street(Enterprise Lane), and 15 feet for access drives (parking areas). 3. Parking Requirements. Each structure shall provide parking according to standards established in the Baxter Creek Business Park Master Plan. The required number and configuration of off-street parking spaces shall be provided by the applicant in accordance with--1--8_:50:120 3T3)--of the City of Bozeman Zone Code unless a variance=orsdeviation is=gr-anted=by=the=C-ity Planning-Staff:' ' /W a All parking areas shall be within the lot boundary, off public and private rights-of-way, and other required setbacks, except where permitted in the Master Plan. P-ar-king=ar aseshall ee-.piacedz-- adjacent to-or=behind=bui-ldingg�I The construction of all parking areas shall be the responsibility of the owner. The plowing and maintenance of all roads, access drives and parking areas shall be the responsibility of the Owners Association, including the assessment of fees. Parking areas shall be sloped for adequate drainage and safety. All site plans shall indicate areas for storage of snow which will be removed from roofs, walkways, drives & parking areas. Parking surfaces shall be asphalt or concrete. Any other material shall be approved by the CDR. Materials shall restrict weed growth and maintain a clearly defined edge between the landscaped area and the parking surface. Materials shall withstand deterioration from winter snow plowing and erosion. 4. Site Drainage. Lot owners may be required to provide-retention=areas=in=addition_to=the=common=storm sew' e ystem—All site plans must indicate surface drainage patterns, retention areas, catch basins, etc. The maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development for each lot. Final facility sizing shall be reviewed and may be reduced during design review of the final site plan for each lot. 5. Public Terraces. Public terraces shall be designed to enhance the overall architecture of the building by creating important common public spaces in the transition zones between parking area and individual or collective buildings. Public terraces shall be finished with paving materials common to the Business Park and shall emphasize building entries through both axial and non-axial arrangements of landscape materials, paving and site furnishings, B. Utilities & Site Details • 13 • It shall be the sole responsibility of the owner to contact utility companies prior to any excavation and grading, including,but not limited to the following: City of Bozeman Sewer&Water Department Montana Power Company U.S. West TCI Cable Co. 1. Utilities. i Utilities shall be installed underground. Meters shall be placed in building recesses so as to be accessible to the meter reader and yet screened. Transformers and other utility boxes shall be concealed with landscaping. A recessed or enclosed container, to Montana Power Company specifications,may be designed into the wall of a building to conceal an electrical meter. All conduit wires servicing the meter are to be beneath the exterior wall sheathing, or enclosed. 2. Water Supply. The Baxter Creek Business Park shall be connected to the City of Bozeman Water District. Owners shall be required to use water saving appliances and devices in the design of the building. As noted in Section H-C below, landscape irrigation areas shall be limited to designated landscape • areas adjacent to buildings to reduce the water consumption. 3. Sewage Disposal. Each lot shall be connected to the City of Bozeman Sewage Disposal System, at the owners sole expense, and such sewage disposal system shall conform to all applicable standards of the State of Montana, Gallatin County or other regulatory agency. Household hazardous wastes, such as oils, cleaning fluids or toxic liquids shall not be disposed into the sewage disposal system or ground surfaces. No outdoor toilets shall be permitted, except for the period of construction as required by Gallatin County and the City of Bozeman. 4. Garbage & Refuse Disposal. All rubbish, trash and garbage shall be regularly removed from the Property, and shall not be allowed to accumulate thereon. Garbage disposal in common open space areas shall be the responsibility of the Owners Association. Trash, garbage and other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All equipment, garbage cans, etc. shall be screened or concealed from view of other buildings, common areas, and adjacent roadways. • 14 5. Screened Service Areas. Fences and walls shall be used to assure that service areas are screened from view of public spaces and adjacent roadways. In general,these improvements shall be consistent in material, color, texture and form with the adjacent building. Privacy screens shall be consistent with the overall design of the building. The height of the screen shall not be taller than 8 feet, and no longer than 24 feet in uninterrupted length. 6. Exterior Lighting. The intent of the lighting restrictions is to reduce the amount of light pollution and to be unobtrusive to neighboring properties. Exterior lighting shall be subdued, understated and indirect. Area lighting shall have concealed light sources. Lights shall be down type and shall not radiate out from the property. In all cases,excessive glare to neighboring properties or circulation shall be avoided. Direct light sources,conforming to S.eeti_on 1�8 50.03.5iA-o—f the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance7X--- shall be used only to illuminate signs, accent the architecture, landscape or artwork, or for the definition of entries and walkways. Flashing, blinking, or moving lights shall not be used. Temporary holiday ornamental lights are allowed but may be subject to review upon complaint of obtrusiveness. Pedestrian lights and all other lights to be installed at the Baxter Creek Business Park shall be specifically reviewed and approved by the CDR. 7. Site Accessories. Mail and newspapers shall be delivered to each building. Exterior mailboxes, newspaper sales boxes or express package depositories may be incorporated on-site with CDR approval. Bicycle racks shall be indicated on site plans,and should typically be located on or adjacent to public terrace areas. C. Landscaping. Through effective use of planting,the architectural elements of Baxter Creek can be softened and blended into the land forms and vegetation of the site. Trees, shrubs and ground cover should be placed in groups of similar species, rather than alone or with a number of other species. In an effort to blend with the surrounding environment and acknowledge the extreme conditions of temperature and moisture, an informal landscape using indigenous plant materials is recommended. • 15 • • All owners are required to maintain their grounds. Maintenance contracts shall be entered into with local landscape and maintenance companies. If, in the opinion of the CDR, grounds are not being maintained,the owner will be notified to rectify the situation. If maintenance is ignored, or if any dead or dying plant materials are not replaced, arrangements will be made to have the necessary work done and the owner will be billed. Any bill not paid within thirty days shall become a lien on the real property of the owner. The CDR requires that all disturbed areas during the building process be restored to their natural state, or landscaped to a degree that is acceptable to the CDR. Sowing of wild grass seed over a disturbed area is not sufficient to restore the land. Owners and their builder should designate land areas that will not be disturbed during construction. It is the owner's responsibility to restore and landscape his or her property. A detailed landscape plan must be presented to the CDR for approval. The approved landscape plan must be completed within one growing season after the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Inspection by the CDR will be made at this time to assure compliance to the approved plan. The following design considerations shall be included in the preparation of landscape plans: 1. Topsoil & Sod. Topsoil replacement i required to a minimum depth of four(4) inches. A soil amendment of an organic nature such as well-rotted cow manure is encouraged to be roto-tilled into the soil in areas that will be seeded or covered with sod. Sod is required in landscape areas adjacent to buildings,pathways,terraces, etc. In disturbed areas where sod gives way to the natural landscape an informal edge shall be created to tie into the natural line created by the existing vegetation. Water wise, drought hardy grasses such as sheep fescue, buffalo grass, crested wheat grass are recommended. 2. Edges. Where formal or groomed planting gives way to the natural landscape, the transition should be defined. This can be accomplished through a natural transition using boulders, perennial wildflowers, or shrub beds, or through elements such as fencing, walls, pathways, or roads. Edge transitions shall not be left to a line of cut and uncut grass. 3. Screening. Planting shall be used effectively to screen service areas and to avoid glare from sources such as automobile head lamps. Sight lines at roadways shall be preserved by holding plantings back sufficiently from the roadway. As a basic solar consideration, clusters of evergreens should be placed on the north and east sides of a building to provide a wind break from prevailing winter 16 • winds. Deciduous trees and shrubs should be placed on the southern and western side to provide shade in the summer months and allow sun to penetrate to the building during the winter months. 4. Exposure. Due to the intense rays of the sun at high elevations,the exposure of plant materials must be considered. Plantings along south facing walls will receive harsh sunlight and extreme temperature changes throughout a 24 hour period, and should be chosen accordingly. 5. Snow Storage. Adequate snow storage areas for each lot shall be designated outside the sight triangles , but on the subject property unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder. Plants located in snow storage areas or in areas of snow and ice shedding should be able to withstand the accumulated snow loads. Planters or planting beds in these areas should incorporate the use of annuals,perennials, bulbs, or low growing evergreens. 6. Landscape & Plant Guarantee. The owner shall provide a schedule for completion prior to the approval of the landscape plan. If at the end of the completion period the approved plan has not been executed as submitted, the CDR or Owners Association shall contract landscaping professionals to provide the necessary work to achieve the approved plan and bill the owner. The owners are required to provide the CDR with a 2 year plant guarantee on all plant materials planted as part of the landscape plan. Any plant that is identified by the CDR as dead or visibly dying within the 2 year guarantee period shall be removed promptly and replaced by the owner with a plant of equal size and quality, if not so replaced following thirty day notice from the CD%, the CDR or Owners Association shall replace such plant materials and bill the owner. 7. Non-Native Plants. Introduction of non-native plant species which might compete with, harm native species, or result in their decline is prohibited except where it is shown that such introduction can improve or prevent undue damage to the natural environment. The planting of ornamental (non-native)woody or shrubby vegetation,especially attractive to wildlife,for landscape purposes is discouraged in order to reduce the likelihood of human-wildlife encounters. 8. Chemicals. The use of chemical herbicides and pesticides is prohibited except for the control of noxious 17 weeds as required by law. Non-chemical weed control is strongly encouraged. Only approved herbicides should be used and a Gallatin County Weed Board Representative (585-1359) should be consulted before applying chemicals to sensitive areas. Contact a local nursery for the most effective pesticides that least impact desirable species of insects. 9. Suggested Plant Materials. Suggested Plant Materials for the Baxter Creek Business Park are based on plant material that has been observed growing in the Gallatin Valley and other areas with a similar climate and elevations above sea level. Since many factors affect the success of plant material, a qualified landscape architect or contractor, familiar with local conditions shall be consulted. The selection and location of plant materials by individual owners shall minimize irrigation water usage. a. Deciduous Trees: Aspen, Cottonwood,Willow,European White Birch, Rocky Mtn. Maple& Big Tooth Maple. b. Ornamental Trees: Alder, Crabapple, Chokecherry, Amur Cherry, Hawthorn, Japanese Tree Lilac, Amur& Tatarian Maple. C. Public Right-Of-Way Trees: Green Ash (seedless varieties), American Ash, Black Ash, Honeylocust, American Linden, Littleleaf Linden,Norway Maple, Sugar Maple,Northwood Red Maple and Burr Oak. d. EverQreen Trees: Douglas Fir, Lodge Pole Pine, Engelmen and White Spruce, Subalpine Fir and Rocky Mountain Juniper. e. Shrubs: Alpine Currant, Barberry, Red Twig Dogwood, Euonymus, Witchhazel, Privet, Honeysuckle, Mockorange, Sumac, Rose, Willow, Potentilla, Plum, Serviceberry, chokecherry, Lilac, Snowberry, Caragana, Cotoneaster, Oregon Grape Holly, Junipers (many varieties), Spirea, Viburnum. Woodrose,Wisteria&yucca. f. Ground Covers/Perennials: Yarrow, Ajuga, Windflower, Columbine, Rockcress, Phlox,Potentilla Verna,Kinnikinnick,Sea Pinks,Sage,Aster,Astilbe,Harebell,Bluebells, Snow-in- Summer, Shasta Daisy, Mums, Coreopsis, Larkspur, Delpinium, Dianthus, Bleeding Heart, Coneflower, Poppy, Euonymus, Fern, Wild Strawberry, Blanket Flower, Sweet Woodruff, Cranesbill, Baby's Breath, English Ivy, Sunrose, Daylily, Coral Bells, Hosta, Candytuft, Iris, Red Hot Poker, Nettle, Lavender, Edelweiss, Gayfeather, Groundsel, Lily, Sea Lavender, Flax, Honeysuckle, Lupine,Moneywort, Monkey Flower, Bee Balm,Primrose, Spurge, Peony, Mountain Lover, Pasqueflower, Lavender Cotton, Salvia, Hens & Chicks, Thyme, Lamb's Ear, Spiderwort, Speedwell, Penstemon (many varieties), Pansy and Zinnia. g. Grasses: Drought tolerant and water wise mixes including natural pasture grasses and wildflower mixes. 18 h. Lawns: Bluegrass Mix(Mixture of Bluegrass,Creeping Red Fescue,Tall Fescue and /or Perennial Rye) or Bluegrass Blends (several varieties of Bluegrass). 10. Landscape Area Treatment&Plant Sizes. a. Common Area Trees: (includes Beautification Easement, Common Open space, common space easement and park). The design theme for the common areas is to complement the Boulevard Trees and allow for a larger choice of plant types. The primary ground cover will be bluegrass lawn. This space can accommodate large trees as well as a smattering of ornamental trees. Trees in the common open space should not block the view of the buildings but evergreens can buffer the parking areas. Filtered views of adjacent views are acceptable. i. Large Deciduous Trees: Min. 2" Cal B&B Autumn Purple Ash, Summit Ash,Rosehill Ash,Robusta Cottonwood, Shademaster Locust, Skyline Locust, Autumn Blaze Maple, Northwood Red Maple, Emerald Queen Maple, Legacy Maple, Silver Queen Maple, Littleleaf Linden, Redmond Linden, Glenleven Linden, Burr Oak, Black Walnut, Golden Willow. ii. Evergreen Trees: Colorado Spruce (Green &Blue): 6'-10' Ht. Austrian Pine 5' Ht. Scotch Pine T-10' Ht. White Fir 6'-10'Ht. iii. Ornamental Trees: European White Birch Clumps 12'-14'Ht. Mountain Ash,Entruion Crabapple,Radiant Crabapple,Liset Crabapple,Brandywine Crabapple Ash. min. 2" Cal. B&B b. Boulevard Trees&Parking;Islands: The Patmore Ash is the boulevard tree to be used along Competition Drive. A choice between Patmore and Summit Ash can be used in parking lot islands. These landscape areas shall be slightly mounded and all areas will receive bluegrass sod. The streetscape will unite the individual parcels of the Baxter Creek Business Park. Patmore & Summit Ash min. 2" Cal B&B C. Building Envelope: (immediate to building). The building envelope landscape areas allow the greatest amount of flexibility in the selection of plant types. All of the color, shrubbery and floral beds are to be located in these areas. This will create the opportunity to create landscape 19 . diversity and interest in each individual property. The perennial and ground. cover list on the following pages shows the extent of plant palette choices. Shrub beds shall include metal edging, weed barrier and texture bark mulch or mulch approved by the CDR. i. Deciduous Trees: Quaking Aspen 5 gal. and up Autumn Purple Ash, Patmore Ash, Rosehill Ash, Shademaster Locust, Skyline Locust, Autumn Blaze Maple, Northwood Red Maple, Emerald Queen Maple, Legacy Maple, Littleleaf Linden, Redmond Linden, Glenleven Linden &Burr Oak. min. 2' Cal B&B ii. Evergreen Trees: Colorado Spruce (green&blue) 6'-10' Ht. White Fir 6 `Ht. Douglas Fir 6'Ht. Bristlecone Pine 4'-5' Ht. iii. Ornamental Trees: European White Birch Clumps 12'-14'Ht. European Mountain Ash, Bechtel's Crabapple, Centuion Crabapple, Radiant Crabapple,Liset Crabapple,Brandywine Crabapple, Spring Snow Crabapple, Japanese Tree Lilac, Amur Maple, Tartian Maple, Washington Hawthorn, Toba Hawthorn,Newport Plum. min. 2" Cal B&B iv. Shrubs: Junipers(Varieties),Isanti Dogwood,Amur Maple,Bigtooth Maple,Thin Leaf Alder, Serviceberry, Chokecherry, Barberry (Varieties), Butterflybush, Cotoneaster (Varieties), Dwarf Winged Euonymus, Forsythia, Althea (Hibiscus), Privet (varieties), Oregon Grape Holly, Mockorange, Ninebark, Western Sand Cherry, Pink Flowering Almond, Canadian Red Cherry, Alpine Currant,Rose(Floribunda's), Spirea(Varieties),White Snowberry, Korean Lilac, Canadian Lilac, Persian Lilac (varieties),Dwarf Mugo Pine, Viburnum (varieties), Yucca (varieties). 5 gal Kelsey Dogwood, Potentilla(varieties) 1 gal V. Perennials &Ground Covers: 20 There is a wide variety of perennials that are hardy in Bozeman. It is the responsibility of each owner to select plants that are hardy to this area and Zone 4. Perennials and ground covers should be used in masses not just individuals unless they are intended as accents such as red hot poker or bleeding heart. Check suggested plant material list. All planting plans will be reviewed by the CDR. 11. References. a. Montana Interagency Plant Materials Handbook, Montana State University Extenstion Service, June 1990. b. Ground Cover Plants for Montana Landscapes, Montana State University Extension Service, 1988. 12. Installation of Common Improvements. The following schedule shall be strictly adhered to for the installation of the items represented: a. e Ciiy�standard s dewalks shall-be-constr-acted=on all public and private street frontages on each lot prior to occupancy of any structure on the lot. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made on the lot. b. Boulevard landscaping shall be installed on all public and private street frontages on each lot in conjunction with sidewalk installation. C. Common area landscaping shall be installed at the time each lot is developed, or within three years of plat recordation. d. The park areas shall be installed within three years from the date of the plat recordation, or at the time of 50 % of the lots are developed, whichever first occurs. e. The US 191 Pedestrian Path and Common Open Space area shown on the final site plan shall be completed by the developer within one-y_ear-of-final:subdivision-plat ecording? f. The sidewalk and landscaping improvements shown on the final site plan for the Open Space at the time the property is developed or within three years of final subdivision plat recording, which ever occurs first. If any tract owner does not comply with the schedule set forth above,the Owners Association will, at the Owners Association's expense, complete the installation of the landscaping or 21 0 • improvement required and any charge accruing to the Owners Association shall become a lien against the tract of the non-complying owner. All owners within the subdivision expressly consent to the imposition of such a lien upon their real property and agree in the event of foreclosure to pay reasonable attorney fees and costs. Any lien so filed shall accrue interest at the legal rate. III. BUILDING DESIGN The intent of the following building requirements are to provide continuity to the context of the built environment,while allowing or the vitality of individual expression. The use of common materials and colors will link the buildings to one another. The type and diversity of uses at Baxter Creek will create the opportunity for unique architectural expressions. A. Building Height Building heights within the Baxter Creek Business Park shall be limited to a maximum. 306et? Building height shall be measured from the highest ridge to the lowest adjacent grade. qf �\ On complex buildings with multiple heights, the building height shall be determined by U� calculating the highest ridge line of the building, and measuring to the lowest adjacent grade. Finished grade shall be the final elevation of the surface material,whether soil, paving, or decking, adjacent to the building as shown on the Architect's drawings. With the approval of the CDR, chimneys, cupolas, and other architectural features may exceed the given height limitations by no more than 6 feet. B. Roof Form The architecture within the Baxter Creek Business Park shall complement the simple character of farm and ranch buildings found throughout the Gallatin Valley. The consistency and compatibility of roof shapes,pitches and materials will contribute significantly to the continuity of the character of Baxter Creek. The following design regulations have been developed to allow for distinct building forms while addressing the character of the entire development and practical design solutions for a diversity of uses. 1. Shape and Pitch. When considering roof shapes and pitches for buildings within Baxter Creek, designers shall consider the simple gable and modified hip shapes and steep pitches of roof forms found within many of the surrounding clusters of farm buildings. Major roof slopes shall be 5:12 to 9:12. Secondary roofs may be shed or gable roofs with pitches not less than 3:12 when attached to major building forms. Flat roofs, mansard roofs,pseudo-mansard roofs, curvilinear roofs, and A- frame roofs are not allowed. 22 The CDR reserves the right to waive the minimum and maximum roof pitch requirements when, in its sole judgement, a lower or steeper roof pitch is more appropriate for the design of a building, and does not compromise the integrity of the development. This privilege may be exercised by the CDR without relinquishing its right to enforce the minimum or maximum requirement on other projects. Roof forms shall be no longer than 50 feet without interruption by a minimum of a four foot projection, four foot recess, or change of orientation. 2. Dormers, Secondary Roofs. Dormers and secondary roofs may be used to add interest and scale to major roof areas and to make habitable use of space within the roofs. Dormers and secondary roofs may have gable or shed forms and may be stacked or repeated in multiple forms. 3. Entry Definition. Snow in the Gallatin Valley often builds up on roof surfaces and slides off at irregular intervals. Such slides can damage property, terraces and balconies, and even injure people. No major roof forms shall slope toward drives, sidewalks, and terraces or any other area which may be damaged or cause injury through the shedding of snow or ice from the roof. When a roof design requires snow slide barriers, such devices shall be integrated into the design of the roof. Entrances shall be specifically emphasized and expressed with the gable or shed roof forms and protected with adequate overhangs. Entrances shall be further defined with columns and recesses at doors. All major roofs shall have overhangs of at least 3 feet. Secondary roof forms may have overhangs of less than three feet. All fascia materials shall be visible for a minimum of 8 inches. Built-up fascias of 12 inches are preferred. 4. Skylights & Solar Collectors When designing the location of skylights,consideration shall be given to both the interior and exterior appearance of the unit. Locations shall also be coordinated with window and door locations. Skylights shall be located away from valleys, ridges and all other areas where drifting snow may hinder the performance and safety of the unit. Skylights shall be of high quality, insulated, double pane construction. Solar collectors shall be integrated into the overall roof design, and shall be placed flush with the slope of the roof or wall of the building. C. Wall Form 23 0 Exterior wall surfaces shall be no longer than 50 feet in length without the introduction of a minimum 4 foot recess, 4 foot projection or change in orientation. Two story exterior wall forms shall be interrupted by minor roof forms. IV. MATERIALS & DETAILS When choosing materials for buildings in the Baxter Creek Business Park, architects should select materials of an appropriate quality and durability in an often harsh northern environment. Synthetic and composite materials which conserve valuable wood resources should be considered whenever a building owner is contemplating opaque finishes and high maintenance areas. All materials shall be of an appropriate scale for use in large commercial structures. The following are the only allowable materials in the Baxter Creek Business Park: A. Roof Materials Roof materials above occupied areas of buildings,or in areas exposed to the sun, mechanical vents, and heat from adjacent chimneys shall be carefully selected to address the freezing and thawing cycle common to most roof designs. Freezing and thawing of roof materials can damage the integrity of the roof surface or injure the occupants of a building. Cold roof systems with adequate ventilation and insulation are recommended. Roof materials shall be constructed of fire resistant materials carrying a Class A or Class B rating. The following are the only acceptable roof materials: i. Class A or B treated wood shakes & shingles ii. Standing seam metal roof materials iii. Class A asphalt random tab shingles iv. Class A Composite synthetic shakes All roof flashing vents, hoods, and roof accessories shall be copper or a pre-finished metal that blends with the color of the roofing material selected. B. Exterior Wall Materials The character of the building exterior should be kept Simple--in order to compliment the surrounding environment of the site. Natura" '"ll�m erials and-subduedzcolors=should predominate the main body of the building. Exterior trim can be more colorful and contrast with the main body, adding visual interest to the predominate neutral tones. 24 • The CDR shall consider materials not listed below that maintain the aesthetic continuity of the Baxter Creek Business Park, including pre-finished wood and synthetic siding materials. 1. qU,dffM osa n y/S.tone. Unit-masonry materials shall be limited to bii--k and tural_stone,as approved by the CDR. Brick an�n�aces-shal-l=be=limited to cliimnney=f rms or as the=base:of exterior wall surface_y_.�Masonry work=shall�ot be-applied=to`individuu-al=wall=snrfaces=in=order-to=avoid_a_-w, veneer-Iike appearance 2. Concrete. Exposed`concr-ete f u�ildat on�s between ground level and exterior wall siding shall be a maximum-of chess Foundation xe posure_ov_eL8=inches=shall be..finished"with synthetic textured— stucco stone,brick,or tr=seated woody 3. Stucco. Synthetic stucco shall-be=per-mitte&providing that the finished surface is adequat-elyt xe ed. to obscure the pattern of insulation panels. Synthetic stucco surfaces shall be a subordinate portion of the exterior surface area, and shall not be applied to individual wall surfaces in order to avoid a veneer-like appearance. 4. Wood&Wood Product Siding & Shingles. ,S om oth-or-rough=sawn=wood-and wood product siding (beveled, shiplapped or board & batten) shall=be:the only-acceptable=exterior wood-sheathing materials? In order to address the large scale of each building, 12"`exposures=of`sidingmaterials ear prefer-red;-however &=-expos u-s=shall be allowed in limited areas. All wood siding shall be painted or stained with an opaque stain and routinely maintained. Wood�shingles_shall_be used_arily as=smaller-_scale-accents=to the larger scale materials of the exterior walls. 5. Chimneys &Vents. Chimneys, flues and vents can be usedito=cr-eatevisual=con-tr-astzto the dominant roof forms of the buildings within the Baxter Creek Business Park. Chimney forms shall relate to the overall building and shall be covered with either brick or stucco. No chimneys enclosures shall be clad in wood or on-masonry appearing materials. All flues shall be masonry,or triple walled stainless steel,enclosed with a chimney cap and fitted with a spark arrestor. No exposed metal or clay flues shall be allowed. Chimneys and flues shall be located to avoid smoke and fumes at ground levels created by down slope winds. Buildings adjacent to steep slopes or with unique roof configurations shall give 25 special attention to down drafts. All chimneys shall be located to ensure adequate disbursement of smoke. Building vents and flues for such functions as ventilation and exhaust shall be consolidated into common decorative enclosures, such as cupolas, or shall be concealed from adjacent roadways. C. Exterior Windows & Doors. 1. Scale, Composition&Proportion Windows and doors shall be of a consistent size, shape and orientation throughout a given building. Window and door patterns and reveals should be designed to create interest and variety. Uninterrupted bands of windows and doors shall not be allowed in any building. Window and door locations shall be carefully considered to avoid being obscured by accumulating snow. 2. Solar Orientation&Exposure. 1 The design and location of exterior windows should respond to the solar orientation of the building. The following energy considerations should be addressed in the building design: - Double/triple glazing with Low E coatings = Neutral density gray solar tinting Openings caulked around windows/doors - Weather-stripping - Storm windows - Entry vestibules 3. Materials. Windows and doors shall be constructed of prefinished enamel or colored aluminum cladding. All glazing shall be framed in walls of brick, stucco or wood. Glass curtain walls shall not be approved in any circumstance. Mirrored glass shall not be used. Glass storm panels, set within the window sash, may be used within divided-light windows, provided that the storm panel is installed on the interior side of the window. Divided light glass must be authentic appearing,no snap-in grills shall be allowed. 4. Service Doors. Service doors shall not be oriented toward the street, and shall be de-emphasized in the elevation of the building. Doors shall be recessed a minimum of 12 inches in an exterior wall, recessed within the volume of the building and/or protected with a minor roof form. Service doors shall be painted metal, and shall not be lighter in color than the building. No fiberglass or exposed • 26 metal doors shall be allowed. 5. Window Coverings. ff sshutt ser g ii'ls=or awningsaare-used�onsexte wr walls, they must be operable-and not_us.ed� merely as ornament. D. Porches & Balconies. 1. Design. Porches and balconies shall be designed to enhance the overall architecture of the building by creating variety and detail on exterior elevations. Porches and balconies shall be recessed into, and projected from the building volume, rather than simply attached to the building. Whenever possible, balconies should be located in areas of high sun exposure while preserving views and solar exposure. 2. Materials. Posts shall be minimum of eight inches square, and should be paired together to diminish a thin visual appearance. The dimensions of two story columns shall be increased to account for the greater height. Materials shall be consistent with the building and surrounding landscape. E. Building Color. Color schemes shall emphasize the contrast between the basic wall surfaces and accented details in order to assure that the development has both consistency and variety. All exterior color schemes shall be reviewed by, and approved by the CDR as a part of the Final Plan Review & Approval. Exterior color schemes throughout the Baxter Creek Business Park should be variations on the simpleTeolor palettes(such=as=palezy_ellow=wal off white trim-green-r-.o_ofJ found with typical farm clusters throughout the Gallatin Valley/!Ere wall surfaces shall be painted or stained with tones ranging from off-white to light brown. Trim and other accenting details of the building shall be of a brighter intensity and contrasting color scheme. The CDR shall consider the color schemes of adjacent buildings in order to assure variety within the development. Changes of color schemes shall be approved by the CDR. F. Energy Conservation. Owners are encouraged to meet with representatives of Montana Power Company regarding 27 energy use in each building. All buildings shall meet the following minimum standards for roof and exterior wall insulation: Roofs: R-50 Walls: R-19 V. FIRE PROTECTION A. Compliance with Fire Regulations All buildings must provide adequate access routes for the Bozeman Fire Department. Building identification signs shall be clearly visible to emergency vehicles from the adjacent street at all times. Buildings requiring fire suppression systems shall install water lines with Siamese connections, designated for sprinkler systems. B. Burning Restrictions. There shall be no exterior fires whatsoever,exceptn=barbecue areas3perrnittedxby=the C—DR. Bulk storage of combustible fuels are prohibited. Only natural gas shall be burned in fireplaces or stoves. Chimney and flues shall be cleaned and checked regularly. Spark arrestors shall be provided around the mouth of the chimney,stove pipe or vent or any heater,stove or fireplace. Spark arrestors shall be cleaned regularly to remove deposits. VI. SIGN REGULATIONS. All signs, posters, displays, or advertisements are prohibited unless they have received the ° approval of the CDR prior to installation or use. Signs_are_restricted�by-the=City of_Bozeman_Zonii—g, Ordmanc�e%ity=of--Bozeman Zoning Ordt e which'changes--from-time to time shalldid esi�gu_ for.signage a Baxter1C=reek=Business Park. VII. CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES A. Approvals Required Before Construction 1. Permits. Construction shall not commence until Final Plan Approval has been received from the CDR and a building permit has been issued by appropriate agencies. Building construction and landscaping must strictly conform to the approved final plan and must be diligently pursued to completion within twelve (12) months after obtaining the building permit unless specific written 4 28 n • extension is granted by the CDR. 2. Approvals. All modifications to previously approved construction and landscape plans must be submitted to be approved by the CDR. 0 B. Construction Regulations. 1. Noise Abatement and Hours of Work. Heavy equipment operation, and other loud noise from construction shall be prohibited between dusk to dawn. The owner/owner's agent shall take necessary precautions and notify effected adjacent property owners, local traffic, pedestrians, etc. prior to construction. 2. Construction Staging and Material Storage. All construction staging, including but not limited to, material storage, equipment storage, construction trailers, etc., must take place within the lot for which the building permit was issued . unless an alternate staging area is approved in writing by the Owner's Association. 3. Trash Containment&Removal. Trash and construction debris shall be kept in containers, and shall be emptied on a regular basis to insure sufficient room to store trash at the end of each working day. It shall be the responsibility of the general contractor to remove and dispose of, at an authorized county land fill, any excess trash and construction debris outside of an approved container shall not be permitted under any circumstances. Burning of trash and debris is not permitted. 4. Tree Protection. Construction practices must include extreme care during grading and excavation to avoid damage to existing trees, shrubs and their root structures. Trees shall be protected by fencing or protected by othr means to prevent damage. Excavation shall not commence until this process has been completed. 5. Temporary Structures. A small job office or trailer may be located on the site during the construction period. The 29 • job office must be removed from the site prior to occupancy. 6. Erosion Control. All disturbed areas of the site shall be protected from erosion during and after the construction period. Erosion control measures must be taken during construction to insure soil stabilization, sediment control, and timely re-vegetation. 7. Property Protection&Clean Up. All construction equipment and activity including stockpiling of materials and topsoil must be kept within the perimeter of the lot unless written authorization is received from the CDR, and adjacent lot owners effected by the construction. Any adjacent property including roads or common grounds damaged during construction shall be promptly restored and re-vegetated to the satisfaction of the CDR. If such restoration is not completed promptly, the CDR will contract for the improvements with all costs charged to the owner. C. Certificate of Appropriateness Upon completion of the construction process, and compliance with these design regulations, the CDR shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness. No building shall be occupied until this certificate has been issued. The owner shall be required to secure certificates of occupancy from the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, or State of Montana. D. Building Inspections. The CDR will not inspect projects for building code conformance, this is the responsibility of the owner and architect. The CDR may however, from time to time review the construction sites for conformance to these design standards. It is also the responsibility of the Applicant or the Applicant's builder to contact the State and other authorities regarding electrical,plumbing and other required inspections. 30 • VHI. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLISTS A. Sketch Plan Review Checklist. Prepare and submit to the CDR 2 copies of the preliminary design in conceptual drawing form to describe all items below: (_) Site plans indicating lot lines,building envelope, easements, setbacks, landscaping materials, new & existing contours @ 2'-0" intervals, site drainage, location of retaining walls, screening fences, drive and parking width &materials. (Scale: 1" =20' min.) (_)Floor plans (scale: 1/16" or 1/8" = 1'-0") (_) Exterior elevations of all sides of proposed buildings (scale: 1/16" or 1/8" = F-0") (_) Roof design (scale: 1/16" or 1/8" = F-0") (_) Exterior materials (_) Building height sketch showing height. (_)Written statement summarizing setback, height and square footage or proposed construction and whether any variance requests will be made. B. Sketch Plan Review Criteria 1. All development is contained within building envelope,unless an automobile canopy is proposed. 2. Conforms to building height requirements. 3. Screening fences are less than 10'-0"high, 24'-0" in unbroken length, and adequately screen service areas from adjacent roadways. 4. Two story volumes are interrupted by an intersecting roof form. 5. Wall and roof forms are less than 50'-0" in uninterrupted length. 6. All variance requests regarding these regulations are clearly defined, and in writing. • 31 • C. Final Plan Review Checklist Two copies of all necessary materials for the Final Plan Review and Approval must be submitted to the CDR at least 10 days prior to their next scheduled meeting. The CDR can only approve a final plan submittal when each of the items listed below has been submitted and approved. (_) GENERAL (_)Baxter Creek Plan Review Fee (_) Baxter Creek clean up deposit (_) Square footage summary (_) Statement of building height and building height calculations. (_) Documents prepared by a registered architect and appropriate engineering consultants if any. (_) SITE PLAN (scale 1"=20' or 1"=16') • (_) Property boundaries (_) Easements and setbacks (_) Existing and proposed contours at two foot intervals (_) Building footprint, indicating maximum area (_)Utility meters located in building recesses (_) Transformers, concealed in landscaping (_) Screened trash enclosure (_) Service lines for water, sewer, gas, telephone, cable TV and electric (existing service to building if applicable) (_) Proposed roads, walks, driveways, parking, terraces, accessory buildings and all site improvements, including bicycle racks. (_) Materials to be utilized for construction of roads, walks, drive, parking, terraces • 32 (_) Surface drainage and retention basins (_) Finished floor elevations (_) LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN(same scale as Site Plan) (_) Extent and location of all plant materials and landscape features (_) Final grading, extent of cut and fill (_) Plant schedule, identifying material by scientific nomenclature, quantity, size and roof system treatment. (_) Proposed treatment of all ground surfaces (turf, ground cover, mulch,pavers, etc.) (_) Extent of turf areas to be mowed and irrigated(irrigation method indicated) (_) Existing plant materials which are to remain on site (_) Proposed seed mixes and rate (_) Lighting location type and wattage • (_) Details of fencing (_) Schedule of installation (_) BUILDING DRAWINGS (scale 1/4" or 1/8" = 1'-0") (_) Floor plans showing square footage (_) All exterior elevations showing finished grade, materials, windows, doors, colors, graphics, details and lighting (_) Primary roof pitch (_) Secondary roof pitch (_) Conformance with building height restrictions (_) Project specifications (_) Full scale material board indicating exterior wall and trim materials, exterior stone • 33 �M • samples, window colors, roof materials and flashing, exterior paving materials, exterior finish colors. (_) Exterior lighting fixture cut sheets • 34 APPENDICES Adjacent Property Owners • CERTIFICATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I, THOMAS M. HENESH, APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE FOLLOWING NAME AND ADDRESS LIST OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 9,T2S,R5E, IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE LIST FROM THE LAST DECLARED GALLATIN COUNTY TAX RECORDS. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT AN INACCURATE LIST MAY DELAY REVIEW OF THE PROJECT. SIGNAT • Norton Ranches 8459 Huffine Lane Bozeman, MT 59718 J. C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision No. J130 1919 West Main Bozeman, MT 59718 Bud H. and Bernice Visser 8552 Huffine Bozeman, MT 59718 Betty Madill 5031 Cottonwood Bozeman, MT 59718 HA3130\001\W PD\AD10IN.W PD • Traffic Impact Study for Baxter Creek Business Park March, 1999 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for • BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK BOZEMAN, MONTANA March, 1999 i • Baxter Creek Business Park PUD TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 II. SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 III. EXISTING AREA ROADWAY SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 2 IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 V. PROPOSED SITE ACCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . Page 4 VI. PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 5 VII. TRAFFIC OPERATION AND SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 6 VIII. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE BASE TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7 • IX. ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7 X. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES/CONSIDERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7 XI. FIGURES XII. APPENDICES A. Traffic Counts B. Capacity Analysis Worksheets C. Accident Summary • • I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY A. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives This Traffic Impact Study: . 1. fdent fies trafficloads-that-the.proposed-development_wil-1-contribute-io the roadway system. 2. Per-oxides==a-basis-for-estimating-site-access-requirements_and--off-site-roadway_, 74mprovements_thz&are-.attr-i-butable to the-proposed development. 3. Assess-es-whether-on=site-functions=w-ill-c`o-mpromise-the off=site_operat ons;_and 4. Assesses-compatibility-with State-anddlocal--transportation-pl-ans.3 II. SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA A. Location The proposed project is located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, T. 2 S., R.5 E., in • Gallatin County, Montana, on the west side of the City of Bozeman, as shown on the location map(Figure II-1)on the following page. The proposed development includes an approximately 17.5 acre parcel bordered by Huffine Lane on the south; the existing J. C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision on the east; an undeveloped parcel and the planned future extension of Fallon Street on the north; and an undeveloped parcel on the west (see Site Map, Figure II-2). B. Study Area 1. The area of influence and of ttra-ffic i-mpac-include:— Huffine.:Lane-(U-S_1.9_1),,,adjacent to the south side of the proposed project; The-Inter-section-of-Cottonwood-Road-(Montana-Secondary_3_45j--wi-th=Huffine Lane; The I-rater-section-of-Cottonwo.od-Road-withBabeock-Road,- Other-existing and_planned--futur`e-roads-in-the--project area-(see Figure II-2). C. Study Area Land Use • 1. The site of the Baxter Creek Business Park PUD was annexed into the City of Page 1 Bozeman along with other properties as part of the Valley West Annexation. At the • same time, the site was zoned Business Park(B-P). Land use regulations governing the proposed subdivision include the Bozeman Area Master Plan, Bozeman Zoning Ordinance,including Entryway Corridor Regulations, City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, and the proposed-Baxter Creek Business Park PUD Development Guidelines. Existing adjacent land uses consist of agricultural to the west and north,residential and agricultural to the south and business (J.C. Billion Auto Plaza) to the east. Adjacent zoning consists of A-S to the south and west,+ 3 to hey o h and B=P to the east. D. Existing Off-Site Developments Existing off-site developments include the following: 1. The existing J.C. Billion Auto Plaza site is located adjacent to the east side of the proposed development and has approximately the same land area. The J C Billion site includes auto dealerships and auto service and repair shops -- the land use is very similar to the proposed uses for the Baxter Creek Business Park.. 2. Other major existing developments in the project area would include the United States • Forest Service and Natural Resource Conservation Service offices as well as new offices under construction in the Valley Unit subdivision one mile to the east. III. EXISTING AREA ROADWAY SYSTEM i A. Description Existing and planned future roads in the project area are shown on Figure II-2. For planned future roads, expected time period of construction is also shown, where.known. All existing roadways are paved,two-lane highways except Huffine Lane which is a four-lane highway with a continuous two-way left-turn lane: Huffine Lane is functionally classified as an arterial highway—it is a main travel corridor between Bozeman and the Four-Corners area, Big Sky Ski Resort and Yellowstone National Park. B. Traffic Volumes and Level-of-Service (LOS) Traffic volumes and turning movements at the intersection of Cottonwood Road with Huffine Lane,basedion-a c_oun� tcondueted on=°Friday,28_August 1_J9_98sare shown on Figure • Page 2 • �� III-1. The north leg of this intersection, at the time of the count,was serving=onl-y<the`J:C::::i Billion Auto=PlazaSubdivision`anddid-not`extend-nortliwto--Babcock.Road.• The existing J.C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivisiondswery similar,in-location,�size-andJand cusesto.the:proposed$axter Creek Pr roject,The above=count;_oma:FF_n y:after-noon=in h ,sum_rner.;i=s expectedito--reflect=near=peak traffie_valume-cenditionsifor both the adjacent Huffine Lane and the J.C.Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision. Counts at this intersection were therefore used to validate calculated trip generation rates, to determine the peak hour of traffic and to determine trip distribution for the proposed Baxter Creek Development. The ex-isf-ng=LOS=on-Huffine Lane;_in,the vicinity of Cottonwood Road, is currently cestimated toibe=Bi or be-ter4 . At the Cottonwood=Road/J3uffine-L-ane I-ntersection; Ir-novements=ar-e_cuirentl-ysoper�ating� ,,,LOS B or`-better exceptrleft=tum5--from--the-north-and-sou-thylegs-which:are-Lestimated_togbe �at-or-�exceedi=ng-capacit-y_-� Because of currently low traffic volumes, Cottonwood Road, Ferguson Road, Babcock Road, Durston Road and other two-lane roads, and their intersections, in the project area are currently estimated to operate at LOS A or B. C. Accident Summary As indicated in Appendix C.,accident data for the one year period following reconstruction of Huffine Lane (to a 4-lane facility with a continuous two-way left-turn lane) have been reviewed and summarized. These data include 14 recorded accidents. Ten of these accidents (5 were at the Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane Intersection and 5 were at other area intersections)involved vehicles making left-turns to(7 accidents)or from(3 accidents) Huffine Lane. D. Other Planned Transportation Improvements IZoad-alignment plans,call:forFallon Street(see Figure II-2)to be extended�west to=at=least Gooch-H-i-lla ad=wi'fh-in-the-next=5=to-1-0 yeaEs. It may,in the foreseeable future,extend as far as Jackrabbit Lane and serve as an east-west frontage road to Huffine Lane (US 191). Other planned or potential roadway extensions are also shown on Figure II-2. IV. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development will include automobile dealerships, related automobile services and typical commercial or office development. Page 3 i A. Site Plan • Figure 4 of the Baxter Creek PUD application shows the planned land uses and interior street layouts for the proposed development. This was presented earlier. B. Development Phasing and Timing The proposed development is planned for construction beginning in 1999. Traffic projections and analyses in this report assume that the new car sales office will be fully implemented and 30% of the other lots will be developed by the year. 2000. Full implementation of the proposed development is assumed by the year 2010. V. PROPOSED SITE ACCESS Potential travel routes that will be immediately available are as follows: AC-1. Travel directly to Huffine Lane at the proposed new Competition Drive/Huffine Lane Intersection, then east on Huffine Lane to the City of Bozeman. AC-2. Via Competition Drive to Cottonwood Road. Once traffic reaches Cottonwood Road, a number of options are available including: • AC-2a. Travel south to the existing Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane Intersection,then east on Huffine Lane to the City of Bozeman. AC-2b. Travel north to Babcock then east to Ferguson Road (or further east to the signalized intersection with West Main Street) then south to the Ferguson Road/Huffine Lane signalized intersection, then east on Huffine Lane to the City of Bozeman. AC-2c. Travel north to Durston Road then east to the Durston/North 19`h Avenue Intersection (currently signalized) and the City of Bozeman or 1-90 AC-3. It is expected that travel to the west, toward the Four-Comers/Belgrade areas, will initially be via Competition Drive to the Competition Drive/Huffine Lane Intersection or via Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane, then west on Huffine Lane. Additional travel routes that will be available, within the next 5 to 10 years, include: AC-4. Access Fallon Street which,when it is constructed, is expected to run adjacent to the north boundary of the proposed development. Fallon Street,which is planned to serve as a frontage road to Huffine Lane, is expected to be extended west to Cottonwood Road within the next 3 to 5 years and will be extended west of the proposed • Page 4 • development, toward Four-Corners, within the next 5 to 10 years. AC-5. Travel north along Cottonwood to Durston Road,Oak Street and Baxter Road. These roads are expected to be extended west toward Jackrabbit Lane in the distant future. Because of the comparatively flat terrain, vertical grades and sight distances are not expected to be a factor on either existing roadways or proposed new interior roadways and access roadways. Existing and planned intersections are all at near right angles with good sight distance .__ VI. >?ROJECTED TRAFFICAOLU`M_ES, A. Non-Site-Traffic Forecast for Each Horizon Year._,_J 1. Non-site traffic is forecast to increase at approximately 5%per yea_. This is based on a review of past growth in the project area. 2. No significant anticipated developments have been identified that will cause growth in the area of influence beyond the normal growth rate listed in the previous paragraph. 3. Estimated Volumes. Estimated traffic volumes at the Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane Intersection, without expected site-generated traffic for the horizon years 2000 and • 2010, are shown on Figure III-1. i B. Site Traffic for Each Horizon Year 1. Table VI-1 shows estimated vehicle trips generated by the proposed Baxter Creek Development as estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual and correlated and validated based on the Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane count (see Section III.B). As shown on the table, it is estimated that 115 vehicles per hour in the year 2000 and 204 vehicles at full build-out in the year 2010 will be generated by the proposed development during the peak hour. 2. The distribution of site generated traffic is shown on Figure VI-1 and VI-2 for the years 2000 and 2010. Left-turn movements from Competition Drive and from Cottonwood Road are shown at nominal amounts much lower than projected demand indicates — the assumption is that, either through capacity constraint or by physical/legal restriction, left-turns will be very difficult and drivers will seek other routes. C. Total Traffic for Each Horizon Year • Page 5 Y Figure VI-3 and VI-4 show estimated hourly traffic volumes and LOS, for both non-site • g and site-generated traffic, in the years 2000 and 2010 at the CottonNvood Road/Huffine Lane Intersection and at the proposed new Competition Drive Intersection. VII. TRAFFIC OPERATION AND SAFETY A. Delay and Level-of-Service As shown,all streets and intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better,through the year 2010, with the exception of left-turns onto Huffine Lane at the Competition Drive/Huffine Lane Intersection (if left-turns are allowed) and the Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane Intersection. It is expected that.these movements;will be LOS F with long delays occurring. Many drivers will likely choose other routes for travel toward the east and the City of Bozeman. As discussed in Section V, there are various options and these redirected trips will be widely dispersed and are not expected to substantially impact any street or intersection. Some site-generated traffic will be traveling on existing streets in the existing J.C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision to access Cottonwood Road. These streets are relatively narrow with on-street parking currently allowed. To help maintain safety and a high level of operation, on-street parking should be eliminated or the streets should be widened. • B. Traffic Safety 1 1. Sight distance-at all:proposed new accesses is adequate. l� 2. Acceleration/Deceleration,Left-Turn and Right-Turn Lanes. Re-cause seu of ihe-existing, highway speeds=on-Huffine Lane and-the confl"icts from both east and-west—access rod `this-r-oadway is_a-conce p r:ticular_1--y-left-turns-from-Competition-Drive or any other ,ne aw p r_oggh,In addition, because of the long delays expected (see Section VII-A), some drivers may become impatient or feel pressured and may attempt this movement when it is not safe. These concerns seem to be substantiated(though only one year of records is available)by recent accident history at existing intersections in the area(see Appendix Q. C. Pedestrian Considerations Pedestrian and bicyclist volumes are low in the area of influence and no problems or negative impacts have been identified. The type of development proposed is not anticipated to generate significant volumes of pedestrian traffic. Page 6 • D. Speed Considerations See paragraph VII.B.2. E..-,Traffic,Control-NLeeds-- .. Traffic-Control-Needs-_ The proposed new-intersection-at_Competitiori will-be stop controlled_.,) All signing and stripping, both off-site and internal to the site, will be designed and constructed in accordance with the MUTCD' and the Montana Traffic Engineering Manual. F. Traffic Signal Needs > No traffic s gnal=needs have-beerridentified-. �-- --- - G. Site Circulation and Parking All parking for the proposed development will be provided internal to the site and will be away from and will not impact existing roadways. VIII. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATE BASE TRAFFIC • See Paragraph III.D. IX. ADDITI-ONAL_IMPROV-EMENTS_TO-ACCOMMODATE SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC A. A_n_ ew_approach-to--uffine-Lane-wi-li-be_constructed-at_Competition-Drive as shown on Figure IV-1. Design of intersection geometries and traffic control devices for this intersection must consider and address the safety and operational concerns and limitations discussed n Sections VII-A,and VII-B, B. An,acccess-on the-riorthboundary-o.f_the-development is also-b_eing.planned to Fallon-Street when-it is-extended.--� X. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES/CONSIDERATIONS A. Other Required Agency Approvals/Permits - Required agency approvals for the Baxter Creek Project include Montana Department of Environmental Quality and City of Bozeman (Planning and Engineering). 'U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control • Devices for Streets and Highways, 1988 Edition. Page 7 0 0 Required permits include Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Service 310 • permits and Montana Department of Transportation approach permit. B. Wetlands,Noise,Air Quality and Aesthetics-Wetlands will be enhanced within the project with approximately 2.5 acres set aside for riparian habitat and the realignment of Baxter Creek to its historic channel. Noise, air quality and aesthetics will reflect that found in the existing J. C. Billion Auto Plaza. C. Affects on Adjacent Landowners-Affects on the J. C. Billion Auto Plaza are expected to be favorable, by attracting more people seeking automotive services. D. Affects on Agriculture - Currently, of the 17.53 acres contained in the proposed Baxter Creek Business Park PUD,approximately 12 acres are planted in grain crops, 1.1 acres are used for pasture, and the remainder of the site is vacant. Adjacent agricultural operations in the vicinity of this proposed subdivision include grain crops and grass production. Effects on agricultural production of the adjacent owners will be negligible. The site is Master Planned and zoned for the uses proposed. • Page 8 a�`� ..N N ".•rri �_ r `d :� � .�}�r' -y u�T�Y�bw y --f� y rTHR R 9U "90, • E BASE IN �� E B'AS .h�►..iv.r ar i - i .q� r tsy y-c 7'-Z "5' r I T mr ... � ��:�t d ,, � `X s� * fall t . '° � • p O A p v T THEY AD r RD 3 x � �Iti x dlo atl r 2 e Ir-' •+ v r ...t- x j`t Z9�pB� ., '�'�a� *� A,'ty, •L xt,..r ; w..rt�'.. J'" '' .r+K �`a t.. a; s jE x _Sir �,;� r y9 �� �� { �a � �,:� � � r Ce ter: •�; .�-O�r : k.,.,, �� �a .-: iL xc4 � I W. yx >z' 4. ;u°d c � ♦ �� � n .f/ } ^�� '�� ..�' � } • -�LEE� °` a .L EY�?> CEN ER � "'RD� '9 ��' ('/� t �' � '� ;BI OT R `°V �''•= MJ _ - Vi � �' rl', L P „ YS � vS�fi" M � 2 1 y � - ,. ? I� 5E i8 ERL m E B T R E 06 m SF ,+ .:z5a+s � y. n. r �,.�-f •i' .�.�'l ,r,, xhi. 4, S '��."•#�, � �1� -d e �'� x y}4b ,�,�'� x, `,{�j. NO .. ;ice �• � - �ii 9 L - � �.. !�, CY-'� r d 6"t-� F 1 R NORI D _ W ? Re io , YY' -r a T -=� : pdt D•. ,�•� 'i+i/ Fk K STUCICEYg u^Z� r -- 1 r+" �� Z'�i •..( .r �U I I1. �. - � - , �.�,wr � ,?1 r��r. �,, a oc. ztC .r r •x 't ...i�• l� 4 i4 ky. a�0 r -r Fti. �� r x.0� �i - - [j(] W�,.rw {�'• fmF -'"'_ �", -'_ Z - ,.. �nL {A 4 d F a � ' z• �` LA ,, _ ,� " � , r� �� � � Protect Site --� L I v �. ,,t ll,, r� .. � - ,.y x � � :�E 2 a w J �•. r a m v r l s ,o F �Y �": t 4 7 i YNOLD �' CHARI � i. � Y i �, y . i TO r � r c „•&:�Ac� �'�,'. ~; ' u .� x C9 t o N2 :� ..,,�• y<,y ��w�'e. 5� rrSc t �r � Ct'`1 k x. 4 .� �' .� �4' z .z"` s .� .� .� �u s � �. - -3130.001.010.0310:fBOZAREA psd Figure II-1 Location Map 0 • - — — — — — DURSTON ROAD BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK o SITE MAP Q 0 _ _ _ - � — CASCADE STREET 0 O o z Q O 0 J v _ — — — — — — — — BABCOCK ROAD - -_--- - - - - - - - - - - - U I O O C� I of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - -10 YEARS} co I q� oo ,��i; n s) foL FALCON STREET IL HUFFINE LANE HUFFINE LANE w US 19.1 Li 0 > a � US 191 (n C,:� p M 00 O Z 0 a o r) +- Z az W FIGURE II-2 0 n MO R RI S O N SC ENTIESTS SURVEYORS MAIERLE,INC. SINCE An Employee—Ou d Co—pmny P.O.Box 1113 901 Tmhmbg Blyd. Bozeman,NT 59772 •Phow(406)587-0721 F=(406)587-1176 TR#MDW'C ^ D1 Q M N O M MM 0 1-0 �30 �48 HUFFINE 761� -739 HUFF INEI239� 1192 (US 191 ) 20� (US 1.91 ) 32� • YEAR 2000 YEAR 2010 rnLn COTTONWOOD COTTONWOOD ROAD ROAD Ln om Mo- 66 �—870 HUFFINE 690-0- �27 • (US 191 ) 18� EXISTING Mo00 Ln FIGURE III- 1 COTTONWOOD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT ROAD INTERSECTION COTTONWOOD/HUFF INE BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK c:\cdrive\traffic\bxtrcrbp\traffic Mar. 12, 1999 07:05:24 FIGURE VI-1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR YEAR 2000 COTTONWOOD TRIPS GENERATED 115 vph 3 TRIPS IN/OUT: 41% i 59% 1 0 3 0 12 • 0 TRIPS WEST/EAST: 36% i 64% 0 01 6 EXTENDED FALLON ROAD 6 0 EXTENDED FALLON ROA 5 0 17 115 5 141 1 71 12 17 123 t 36 COTTONWOOD COMPETITION COTTONWOOD 22 10 12 1 10 27 1 51 01 51 09 15 9 17 5 20 20 15 24 HUFFINE HUFFINE 0 12 HUFFINE 0 HUFFINE 12 0 10 10 10 15 • 0 0 COTTONWOOD S 345 FIGURE VI-2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR YEAR 2010 COTTONWOOD TRIPS GENERATED 204 vph 5 TRIPS IN/OUT: 41% i 59% 1 01 51 F-2-5 0 TRIPS WEST/EAST 36% i 64% 13 ol 11 EXTENDED FALLON ROAD 11 0 EXTENDED FALLON ROA 9 0 37 9 25 1 131 25 37 75 COTTONWOOD COMPETITION COTTONWOOD 35 10 251 1 10 F 4815 0 5 11 27 11 301 F 321 271 38 HUFFINE HUFFINE 10 • F-2--11 HUFFINE —01 HUFFINE 21 0 10 10 10 15 0 0 I ol ol 701. 0 COTTONWOOD S 345 v m co • c�Ov ri0� 39 59 HUFF INE 77 �� �-934 HUFFINE 1249� 1589 (US 191 ) 20--,, (US 191 ) 32� YEAR 2000 YEAR 2010 N"'o COTTONWOOD COTTONWOOD ROAD ROAD FIGURE VI- 3 TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION COTTONWOOD/HUFFINE BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK c:\cdrive\traffic\bxtrcrbp\traffic Mar. 12, 1990 07:05:32 COMPETITION COMPETITION DRIVE DRIVE • cv0 ino _ — N— 15 �27 HUF F INE 1 2--'Of 1 0 1 4 HUFF INE 2 1--"'� 1 65 1 (US 191 ) 802—► (US 191 ) 1299—► YEAR 2000 YEAR 2010 FIGURE V I- ZI TRAFFIC VOLUMES . WITH DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION COMPETITION/HUFFINE BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK c:\cdrive\traffic\bxtrc,by\traffic Mar. 12, 1999 08:26:18 • APPENDICES i • • • TRAFFIC COUNTS • • TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY HUFFINE & COTTONWOOD PM COUNTS 28-Aug-98 Fri HOUR NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND HOURLY BEGINNING LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TRAFFIC 04:00:00 PM 10 12 201 7 4 3 157 11 1721 04:15:00 PM 4 10 11 191 2 7 3 1 167 28 1738 04:30:00 PM 7 11 21 207 6 8 4 3 189 6 1806 04:45:00 PM 5 16 15 214 7 . 8 7 4 153 1 1751 05:00:00 PM . 1 6 12 209 7 10 2 1 168 6 1742 05:15:00 PM 25 18 240 7 9 6 2 180 5- • 05:30:00 PM 1 7 16 222 3 6 1 8 2 135 6 05:45:00 PM 1 5 23 198 6 8 1 3 4 164 8 FOR PEAK HOUR BEGINNING: 04:30 PM COTTONWOOD SOUTHBOUND 54 191 0 35 37 27 902 870 963 HUFFINE TOTAL 1806 66 WESTBOUND • 10 HUFFINE F 7-18 690 783 EASTBOUND. 18 841 131 01 58 • CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS • • HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS. Analyst: Brad Peterson Intersection: Cottonwood/Huffine Count Date: 1998 w/o Development Time Period: PM Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------7----------------------------------------------- ------- Volume: 10 690 18 27 870 66 13 0 58 19 0 35 HFR: 10 690 18 27 870 66 13 0. 58 19 0 35 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: Blockage: • Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: of vehicles: Northbound 0 of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,20 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0..00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R' L T R L T R ------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 • Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.3 4.3 7.7 6.7 7.1 7.7 6.7 7.1 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 . 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0• 3.3 f'HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t f 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 --------------------------------------------'--------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations • Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------:----------------- Conflicting Flows 354 468 Potential Capacity 620 520 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 620 520 Probability of Queue free St. 0.91 0.93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------ Conflicting Flows 708 936 Potential Capacity 835 680 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 835 680 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 0.99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1709 1685 Potential Capacity 83 86 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 0.95 Movement Capacity 79 82 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ------------7---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • Conflicting Flows 1208 •1322 Potential Capacity 130 107 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 0.95 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 0.96 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.87 Movement Capacity 117 93 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------� v(vph) 13 0 58 19 0 35 Movement Capacity 117 79 620 93 82 520 Shared Lane Capacity 620 520 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------� v(vph) 10 27 13 58 19 35 C m(vph) 680 835 117 620 93 520 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.09 0.20 0.07 95W queue length Control Delay 10.4 9.5 39.6 11.4 53.3 12.4 LOS B A E B F B Approach Delay 16.6 26.8 Approach LOS C D ------------------------------------------------------------------------r---------------=------ • I I • HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Brad Peterson Intersection: Cottonwood/Huffine Count Date: 2000 w/o Development Time Period: PM Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 11 761 20 73 959 73 14 5 64 39 5 21 HFR: 11 761 20 73 959 73 14 5 64 39 5 21 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- F1ow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: • Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Sout^round 0 Lane usage for movements 1,20 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y• Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L R L - L R ------ -------- ------ -------------- ------------- - Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.3 4.3 7.7 6.7 7.1 7.7 6.7 1.1 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.10 0..10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t f 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 -------------------------------------------=--------------------------------------------------- • • Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 391 516 Potential Capacity 586 483 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 586 483 Probability of Queue free St. 0.89 0.96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 781 1032 Potential Capacity 782 623 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 782 623 Probability of Queue free St. 0.91 0.98 ----------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------ Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1971 1945 Potential Capacity 56 59 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 0.89 Movement Capacity 50 52 Probability of Queue free St. 0.90 0.90 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1421 1547 Potential Capacity 90 72 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0.81 0.80 Maj . L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.35 0.85 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.81 0.75' Movement Capacity 73 54 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------� v(vph) 14 5 64 39 5 21 Movement Capacity 73 50 586 54 52 483 Shared Lane Capacity 330 187 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------� ! v(vph) 11 73 14 69 39 26 C m(vph) 623 782 73 330 54 187 v/c 0.02 0.09 0.19 0.21 0.72 0.14 95%- queue length Control Delay 10.9 10.1 65.7 18.8 167.5 27.4 LOS B B F C F D Approach Delay 26.7 111.4 Approach LOS D F ------------------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------- i I ' i HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Brad Peterson Intersection: Cottonwood/Huffine Count Date: 2010 w/o Development Time Period: PM Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------ Volume: 18 1239 32 119 1562 119 23 5 104 34 5 63 HFR: 18 1239 32 119 1562 119 23 5. 104 34 5 63 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: k Blockage: Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,20 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 0 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 • L ------T------R------L------T ------R------L.------T------ R Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound westbound Shared In volume,' major th'vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 5.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.3 4.3 7.7 6.7 7.1 7.7 6.7 7.1 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,.0 1.0 1.0 1 A 1.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t f 2.3 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 3.6 4.1 3.4 ---------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------- 1 worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------ Conflicting Flows 636 841 Potential Capacity 402 292 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 402 292 Probability of Queue free St. 0.74 0.78 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1271 1681 Potential Capacity 501 343 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 501 343 Probability of Queue free St. 0.76 0.95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 3210 3167 Potential Capacity 8 9 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.72 0.72 Movement Capacity 6 6 Probability of Queue free St. 0.17 0.23 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steo 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ------------7---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 2313 2518 Potential Capacity 18 13 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.17 0.13 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.30 0.25 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.23 0.19 Movement Capacity 4 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------� v(vph) 23 5 104 34 5 63 Movement Capacity 4 6 402 2 6 292 Shared Lane Capacity 101 69 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------� v(vph) 18 119 23 109 34 68 C m(vph) 343 501 4 101 2 69 v/c 0.05 0.24 5.37 1.08 14.35 0.99 95% queue length Control Delay 16.1 14.4 3558.2 193.4 8871.2 206.5 LOS C B F F F F Approach Delay 779.7 3094.7 Approach LOS F F ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------ i • HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 'TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Brad Peterson Intersection: Competition/Huffine Count Date: 2000 with Development Time Period: PM Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 5 6 10 11 12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------- Volume: 12 802 1014 15 10 0 12 HFR: 12 802 1014 15 10 0 12 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: W Blockage: Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 • L T R L T R L T R ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ------------------------------------------------------------7---------------------------------- Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume,- major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 . 0.10 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.3 7.0 6.7 7.1 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement. 1 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.10' 0.10 0.10 0.10 t f 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor -------------------------9---------------12 --- - Conflicting Flows 515 Potential Capacity 485 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 485 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1029 Potential Capacity 625 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 625 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1848 Potential Capacity 68 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 Movement Capacity 66 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT.from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1447 Potential Capacity 114 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.98' Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 112 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------� v(vph) 10 0 12 Movement Capacity 112 66 485 Shared Lane Capacity 485 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I i worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------� v(vph) 12 10 12 C m(vph) 625 • 830 112 v/c 0.02 0.09 0.02 95* queue length Control Delay 10.9 40.3 12.6 LOS B E B Approach Delay 25.2 Approach LOS D ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I� HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Brad Peterson Intersection: Competition/Huffine Count Date: 2010 with Development Time Period: PM Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 5 6 10 it 12 Volume: 21 1299 1651 27 10 0 25 HFR: 21 1299 1651 27 10 0 25 PHF: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHV: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: t Blockage: • Median Type: TWLTL # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N Y N N Y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N N N N Y N N Y Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 • -------L------T------R------L------T R L T R ------ ------ ------ ------ -- N N N N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ---------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------- Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 0 0 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 2 2 ._ Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t c,base 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 t c,hv 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,lt 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t c 1 stage 4.3 7.0 6.7 7.1 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t f,base 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P by 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 t f 2.3 3.6 4.1 3.4 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations 0 Step 1: RT from Minor St. ----- -- - ------ - 9 - 12 Conflicting Flows 839 Potential Capacity 293 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 293 Probability of Queue free St. 0.91 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 1678 Potential Capacity 344 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 344 Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 3006 Potential Capacity 12 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 Movement Capacity 11 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steo 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows 2356 Potential Capacity 27 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.94 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.95 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.95 Movement Capacity 25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------� v(vph) 10 0 25 Movement Capacity 25 it 293 Shared Lane Capacity 293 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 -------------� v(vph) 21 10 25 C m(vph) 344 . 540 25 v/c 0.06 0.39 0.09 95W queue length Control Delay 16.2 219.2 18.4 LOS C F C Approach Delay 75.8 Approach LOS F ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCIDENT SUMMARY i i i • • Appendix C. Accident Summary Based on information available from the Safety_M_anagement:System-of-the:Montana-Department of-Transportation,;1;4•accidents-were:recorded-on•the o-ne ile.seciio o Huffine-Laoe.(US:191) beginning and ending0:5'miles.west and'eastbfthe proposed'Competition`Drive,Intersection during the one-year period froin-01`October-1997 to30 September•1998:-This is the first=full.year-following, construction on Huffihe',L ane-which improved it to'afour-lane-highway-with-a continuous two-way left-turn lane. Though one year is normally not considered sufficient�time to identify,accident trends,---• infonnatiori previous to October 1997 taa Mt 15e meaningful•because it wouldbe during or, .preyious � to the major'construction,project. Of.the=14=recorded7accidents;ttwo were-non=intersection-related:1 One of these was a fatal, non- intersection related accident that occurred near the Cottonwood Road/Huffine Lane Intersection. The other was a property damage only accident that occurred approximately 0.3 miles west of the proposed Competition Drive Intersection. Tfre.remaining=l2=aecidents•w a intersection-rela ed-and included:z - 'Six'occu ed`atthe.existing,Cottonwood•Road%Huffine.LaneIntersection,located:0 miles east of the proposed Competition Drive Intersection. Of these:fog a cider (one injury accident and 3 property damage only accidents) involved--vehicles- attemptingato makeWleft'turn fromthe north leg onto�Huffine,L-ane and collided with east-orswest=bound-vehicles;_one-was-an•injury•accident.involving.a west-bound. v61Rle,atteinpting to tun left(so`uth)onto'Cottonwood-Road�that was'struck•by,an= eastbound vehicle;=and one-accident•(property damage only) involved-a-vehicle stopped on the northbourid'leg that waas'struck by' a west=bound,right=turning vehicle that-was-out=of-co rn ol,on:ice.._._ Four_occurred=at-the.-existing_Fowler Road/Huffine_Lane-Intersectior3 (located approximately-l=27miles•eas ogthe proposed Competition Drive Intersection). Of these:ot:w.oaccidens (one injury accident and one property damage onlY) invol-ved Ve-Eicles`attempting to make'a'left turn,from-Fowler,Road to�go east-on-Huffine:Lane thatwere.struck.by.east-.or-west-bound.vehicles;.and two accidents={both property damage only) involved=east=bound,le`ft=turning vehicles that-were struck'by'west~ bound?thr uo ghh vehicles. - One_injur_y,�acc dent-occurred_at_the-existing-Ferguson..Road/Huffine Lane Intersection(located approximately0=-5niles east7ofthe proposed Competition Drive Intersection) involved -.stopped-south=bound-vehicle-that was=rear-ended.by`a- second'vehicle. Oe-inju y�accident occurred at•the:existing,Kountz-Road/Huffine Lane-Intersection (located approximately 0.5 miles east of the proposed Competition Drive Intersection)and involved.left;turning vehicle exiting-KountzaRoad that,was�struck- by an east-bound,through vehicle. NRCS SOILS INFORMATION i 537A--Lamoose silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Setting Landform: Stream terraces Slope: 0 to 2 percent Elevation: 4,000 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Frost free period: 90 to 110 days Composition Major Components Lamoose and similar soils: 85 percent Minor Components Meadowcreek loam: 0 to 5 percent Bonebasin loam: 0 to 10 percent Major Component Description Surface layer texture: Silt loam Depth class: Very deep (more than 60 inches) Drainage class: Poorly drained Dominant parent material: Alluvium Native plant cover type: Rangeland Flooding: None Water table: Apparent • Available water capacity: Mainly 5.5 inches A typical soil description with range in characteristics is included, in alphabetical order, in this section. Additional information specific to this map unit, such as horizon depth and textures, is available in the "Soil Properties" section, Part II, of this publication. Management For general and detailed information about managing this map unit, see the following sections in Part II of this publication: * "Range" section * "Agronomy" section * "Recreation" section * "Wildlife Habitat" section * "Engineering" and "Soil Properties" sections 510B--Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Setting Landform: Stream terraces Slope: 0 to 4 percent Elevation: 4,200 to 5,950 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Frost free period: 90 to 110 days Composition Major Components Meadowcreek and similar soils: 85 percent Minor Components Beaverton loam moderately wet: 0 to 5 percent Blossburg loam: 0 to 10 percent Major Component Description Surface layer texture: Loam Depth class: Very deep (more than 60 inches) Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Dominant parent material: Alluvium Native plant cover type: Rangeland Flooding: None Water table: Apparent Available water capacity: Mainly 4.9 inches A typical soil description with range in characteristics is included, in alphabetical order, in this section. Additional information specific to this map unit, such as horizon depth and textures, is available in the "Soil Properties" section, Part II, of this publication. Management For general and detailed information about managing this map unit, see the following sections in Part II of this publication: * "Range" section * "Agronomy" section * "Recreation" section * "Wildlife Habitat" section * "Engineering" and "Soil Properties" sections • • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE HYDRIC SOILS LIST MAPUNITS WITH HYDRIC COMPONENTS consultants The "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" "Non-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications -No. 149.1, June, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by Section 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991) . See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils" endnote to to determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end-of the report. FSA Criteria and Hydric Soils Criteria Information Map Symbol IComponent(C)/l Mapunit Name linclusion(I) Hydric Local Hydric Meets Meets I Meets I Natural Landform Criteria saturation Flooding I Ponding [Condition] Needs Code Criteria criteria Criteria of Soil 10n-Site 537A: Lamoose silt loam, 0 i to 2 percent slopes---ILamoose (C)--j YES 1 1 293 YES I NO I NO IMEADOWCREEK LOAM (I)----I NO 1BONEBASIN LOAM (I)----I YES ITerrace 12B3,3 YES I NO I YES INeither I YES 542A: Blossberg loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes------Blossberg (C)l YES 1 1 293 YES I NO I NO IMEADOWCREEK LOAM (I)----I NO 1BONEBASIN LOAM (I)----I YES ITerrace 12B3,3 I YES I NO I YES (Neither YES i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06 HYDRIC SOILS LIST MAPUNITS WITH HYDRIC INCLUSIONS consultants The "Hydric Soils Criteria" columns indicate the conditions that caused the mapunit component to be classified as "Hydric" or "Non-Hydric". These criteria are defined in "Hydric Soils of the United States" (USDA Miscellaneous Publications No. •1491, June, 1991. The "FSA Criteria" columns contain information needed for the Food Security Act determinations required by Section 512.11(h) (4) of the National Food Security Manual (August, 1991). See the "Criteria for Hydric Soils" endnote to to determine the meaning of these columns. Spot symbols are footnoted at the end of the report. FSA Criteria and Hydric Soils Criteria Information Map Symbol leomponent(C)/l Mapunit Name lInclusion(I) 1 Hydric I Local I Hydric I Meets I Meets I Meets I Natural Landform I Criteria ISaturationIFloodingIPonding lConditionj Needs Code I Criteria ICriterialCriterial of Soil jOn-S•ite 510B: Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes---IMeadowcreek (C)---------I NO IBEAVERTON LOAM I MODERATELY WET (I)-----I NO IBLOSSBURG LOAM (I)----I YES ITerrace 12B3 YES I NO I NO INeither I YES. 5098: Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes--------jEnbar (C)----I NO STRAW LOAM (I)---------I NO JOPHUR LOAM (I)---------I YES lFlood Plain 12B3 I YES I NO I NO INeither I YES • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE HYDRIC SOILS CRITERIA CODES AND DEFINITIONS Endnote -- HYDRIC SOILS LIST The column 'Natural Condition of the Soil' indicates the following information: 'Wooded' indicates the soil supports woody vegetation under natural condition; 'Farmable' indicates the soil can be farmed under natural conditions without removing woody vegetation or other manipulation; and 'Neither' indicates neither of the above =onditions are met. 1. All Histosols, except Folists, or 2. Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Aquisalids, Pachic subgroups, or Cumulic subgroups that are: a. somewhat poorly drained with a water table equal to 0.0 foot (ft.) from the surface duri::ig the growing season, or b. poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: (1) water table equal to 0.0 ft. during the growing season if textures are coarse sand, sand, or fine sand in all layers within 20 inches (in.), or for other soils, or (2) water table at less than or equal to 0.5 ft. from the surface during the growing season if permeability'is equal to or greater than 6.0 in/hour (h.) in. all layers within 20 in., or (3) water table at less than or equal to 1.0 ft. from the surface during the growing season, if permeability is less the. 6.0 in./h. in any layer within 20 in., or • 3. Soils that are frequently ponded for long or very long duration during the growing season, or 4. Soils that are frequently flooded for long or very long duration during the growing season. i I • W U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 • ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES consultants Classification I Fragments I Percentage passing I I Map symbol I Depth'I USDA texture 1 I I sieve number-- ILiquidl Plas- and soil name I I I I I >10 1 3-10 I 1 limitl.ticity I I I Unified I AASHTO lincheslinchesl 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1 lindex I I I I I I I I I I I I I In I I I I Pct I Pct I I I I I Pct 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Turner----------1 0-6 1Loam ICL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0-10 180-100175-100165-95 150-75 1 25-301 5-10 I 6-12 [Clay loam, ICL, GC, SC IA-6 1 0 1 0-10 165-300160-100155-90 135-70 1 30-401 10-20 I I silty clay I I I I I I I I I I j I I loam, gravellyl I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 12-26 ILoam, clay ICL, GC, SC IA-6 1 0 1 0-10 165-100160-100155-95 140-75 1 30-401 10-15 I I loam, gravellyl I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 26-60 IVery gravelly IGP, GM, GP-GMIA-1 1 0 110-30 125-60 115-50 110-35 1 0-15 1 0-141 NP I I loamy sand, I I I I I I I I I I I I very gravelly I I I I I I I I I I • I I sand, I I I I I I I I l I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly sand I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 51OB: I I I I I I I I I I I I Meadowcreek-----1 0-11 ILoam ICL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100170-95 150-75 1 20-301 5-10 1 11-25 ILoam, sandy ISC-SM, CL-ML IA-4 1 0 1 0 195-100190-100170-90 140-75 1 20-301 5-10 I I loam, silt I I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I I I I 1 25-60 IVery gravelly IGP, GP-GM IA-1 1 0 1 0-10 125-45 115-35 110-25 1 0-10 1 --- I NP I I sand, I I I I I l I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I I I I gravelly sand,I I I I I I I I I I I I very gravelly I I I I I I I I I I I I loamy sand I I I I I I I I I I 537A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Lamoose---------1 0-9 ISilt loam ICL-ML, CL IA-4, A-6 1 0 1 0 180-100175-100170-95 155-90 1 25-351 .5-15 . 1 9-27 ILoam, silt IGM-GC, GC, • IA-4, A-6, A-21 0 1 0 155-100150-100145-95 130-85 1 25-351 5-15 I I loam, gravellyl CL-ML, CL I I I I I I I I I I I loam I I I I I I I - I I I 1 27-60 IVery gravelly IGM, GP-GM, GPIA-1 1 0 1 0-20 125-55 120-50 110-40 1 0-15 1 0-141 NP- I I loamy sand, I I I I I I I I I I I I very gravelly I I I I I I I I I I I I sand, I I I I I I I I I I I I extremely I I I I I I I I I i •1 1 gravelly sand I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 U.S..DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 • ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES Endnote -- ENGINEERING INDEX PROPERTIES This report gives estimates of the engineering classification and of the range of index properties for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. Most soils have layers of contrasting properties within the upper 5 or 6 feet. DEPTH to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. The range in depth and information on other properties of each layer are given in the published Soil Survey for each soil series under "Soil Series and Their Morphology." TEXTURE is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is as much as about 15 percent, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Textural terms are defined in the Soil Survey Glossary. Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. The UNIFIED system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are • classified according to grain-size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of grain-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspec=ion. If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A-1-a, A-l-b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7- 5, or A-7-6. As an additional refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. Rock FRAGMENTS larger than 3 inches in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight percentage. Percentage of soil particles passing designated sieves (PERCENTAGE PASSING SIEVE NUMBER--)is the percentage of the soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. LIQUID LIMIT and PLASTICITY INDEX (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. The estimates • of grain-size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index are generally rounded to the nearest 5 percent. Thus, if the ranges of gradation and Atterberg limits extend a marginal amount (1 or 2 percentage points) across classification boundaries, the classification in the marginal zone is omitted in this report. NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT consultants • Map Soil name and description Symbol 457A Turner loam, moderately wet, 0 to 2 percent slopes TURNER LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-2 PERCENT. LANDFORM: STREAM TERRACES; FROST FREE DAYS: 90-110; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES: 3.6-6.8; MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS: WATER TABLE; LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE: CROPLAND, RANGELAND. 510B Meadowcreek loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes MEADOWCREEK LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-4 PERCENT. LANDFORM: STREAM TERRACES; FROST FREE DAYS: 90-110; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES: 4.5-5.4; MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS: WATER TABLE; LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE: CROPLAND, RANGELAND. 537A Lamoose silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes LAMOOSE SILT LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A • DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-2 PERCENT. LANDFORM: STREAM TERRACES; FROST FREE DAYS: 90-110; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES: 4.9-6.1; MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS: WATER TABLE; LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE: RANGELAND. 509E Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes ENBA.R LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-4 PERCENT. LANDFORM: FLOOD PLAINS; FROST FREE DAYS: 90-110; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES: 7.7-9.8; MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS: FLOODING, WATER TABLE; LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE: CROPLAND, RANGELAND. 748A Hyalite-Beaverton complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes HYALITE LOAM IS MORE THAN 60 INCHES DEEP WITH A DARK COLORED SURFACE LAYER AND SLOPES OF 0-4 PERCENT. LANDFORM: ALLUVIAL FANS AND STREAM TERRACES; FROST FREE DAYS: 90-110; AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY IN INCHES: 3.4-5.1; MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS: NONE; LANDUSE MAY INCLUDE: CROPLAND, RANGELAND. • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS consultants (Entries under "Erosion factors--T" apply to the entire profile. Entries under "Wind erodibility group" and "Wind erodability index" apply only to the surface layer) I I I I I I I (Erosion f.sctorslWind (Wind Map symbol I Depth I Clay I Moist I Permea- IAvailablel Shrink- 1Organicl Ierodi-Ierodi- and soil name I I I bulk I bility I water I swell I matterl I I Ibilitylbility I I I density I Icapacity 1potentiall I K I Kf I T Igroup lindex I I I I I I I I I I�I I In I Pct I g/cc I In/hr I In/in I I Pct I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Turner----------I 0-6 1 15-2711.10-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.191Low 12.0-4.01 0.371 0.371 3 1 6 1 48 1 6-12 1 25-3511.30-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.12-0.18IModerate 10.5-2.01 0.241 0.371 1 1 1 12-26 1 18-3511.35-1.501 0.60-2.00 10.12-O.18IModerate 10.0-0.51 0.241 0.371 1 1 1 26-60 1 0-5 11.35-1.50I 6.00-20.0010.01-0.06ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 510B: I I I I I I I I I I I I • Meadowcreek-----1 0-11 1 18-2511.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.20ILow 12.0-5.01 0.371 0.271 3 1 5 1 56 1 11-25 1 18-2511.20-1.40I 0.60-2.00 10.13-0.151Low 11.0-3.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 25-60 1 0-5 11.20-1.501 >20.00 10.02-0.03ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.20I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 537A: I I 1 I I I I I I I I I Lamoose---------1 0-9 1 18-27I1.10-1.201 0.60-2.00 10.17-0.21ILow 14.0-6.01 0.281 0.281 3 1 4L 1 86 1 9-27 1 18-2711.15-1.301 0.60-2.00 10.15-0.181Low 12.0-4.OI 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 27-60 1 0-1011.60-1.751.6.00-20.0010.02-0.03ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.201 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 509B: I I I I I I I I I I I I Enbar-----------1 0-22 1 18-2711.15-1.351 0.60-2.00 10.16-0.20ILow 13.0-5.01 0.281 0.281 4 1 6 1 48 1 22-49 1 18-2711.35-1.551 0.60-2.00 10.14-0.18ILow 10.5-1.01 0.371 0.371 1 1 1 49-60 1 5-1811.50-1.701 2.00-6.00 10.04-0.05ILow I --- 1 0.051 0.20I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 748A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------1 0-5 1 18-2711.10-1.201 0.60-2.00 10.18-0.19ILow 12.0-4.01 0.281 0.231 3 1 6 1 48 1 5-8 1 25-3511.30-1.401 0.20-0.60 I0.16-0.19IModerate 11.0-3.01 0.321 0.3:21 1 1 1 8-17 1 25-35I1.30-1.40I 0.20-0.60 10.12-0.17IModerate 11.0-3.01 0:151 0.321 1 1 1 17-26 1 15-2511.50-1.601 0.20-0.60 10.03-0.OBILow 10.5-1.01 0.051 0.321 1 1 1 26-60 1 0-1011.60-1.70I 6.00-20.00I0.02-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.051 0.171 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Beaverton-------1 0-7 1 20-27I1.20-1.401 0.60-2.00 10.14-0.16ILow 11.0-3.01 0.171 0.371 2 1 6 148 1 7-14 1 25-3511.40-1.60I 0.60-2.00 10.08-O.10ILow 10.5-1.01 0.101 0.371 1 1 1 14-60 1 0-1011.55-1.751 6.00-20.0010.03-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.021 0.101 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I • 441A: I I I I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I 0-5 118-2711.10-1.20I 0.60-2.00 I0.18-0.19ILow I2.0-4.OI 0.321 0.321 3 1 6 148 1 5-8 1 25-35I1.30-1.40I 0.20-0.60 10.16-0.191Moderate 11.0-3.01 0.321 0.321 1 1 1 8-17 1 25-3511.30-1.401 0.20-0.60 10.12-0.17IModerate 11.0-3.01 0.151 0.321 1 1 1 17-26 1 15-2511.50-1.601 0.20-0.60 10.03-0.08ILow 10.5-1.01 0.051 0.321 1 1 1 26-60 1 0-1011.60-1.701 6.00-20.0010.02-0.04ILow 10.0-0.51 0.05I 0.151 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 • PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS Endnote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS This report shows estimates of some characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates are given for the major layers of each soil in the survey area. The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. CLAY as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In this report, the estimated clay content of each major soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The amount and kind of clay greatly affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil. They determine the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture. They influence shrink-swell potential, permeability, plasticity, the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations. MOIST BULK DENSITY is the weight of soil (ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity, the moisture content at 1/3 bar moisture tension. Weight is determined after drying the soil at 105 degrees C. In this report, the estimated moist bulk density of each major soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Bulk density data are used to compute shrink-swell potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space available for • water and roots. A bulk density of more than 1.6 can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist bulk density is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter, and soil structure. PERMEABILITY refers to the ability of a soil to transmit water or air. The estimates indicate the rate of downward movement of water when the soil is saturated. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field,,particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Permeability is considered in the design of soil drainage systems, septic tank absorption fields, and construction where the rate of water movement under saturated conditions affects behavior. AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of storing for use by plants. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each major soil layer, The capacity varies, depending on soil properties that affect the retention of water and the depth of the root zone. The most important properties are the content of organic matter, soil texture, bulk density, and soil structure. Available water capacity is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in the design and management of irrigation systems. Available water capacity is not an estimate of the quantity of water actually available to plants at any given time. SHRINK-SWELL POTENTIAL is the potential for volume change in a soil with a loss or gain of moisture. Volume change occurs mainly because of the interaction of clay minerals with water and varies with the amount and type of clay minerals in the soil. The size of the load on the soil and the magnitude of the change in soil moisture content influence the amount of swelling of soils in place. Laboratory measurements of swelling of undisturbed clods were made for many soils. For others, swelling was estimated on the basis of the kind and amount of clay minerals in the soil and on measurements of similar soils. If the shrink-swell potential is rated moderate to very high, shrinking and swelling can cause damage to buildings, roads, and other structures. Special design is often needed. Shrink-swell potential classes are based on the change in length of an unconfined clod as moisture content is increased from air-dry to field capacity. The change is based on the soil fraction less • than 2 millimeters in diameter. The classes are "Low," a change of less than 3 percent; "Moderate," 3 to 6 percent; and "High," more than 6 percent. "Very high," greater than 9 percent, is sometimes used. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 4 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS Endnote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued ORGANIC MATTER is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. In report J, the estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained or increased by returning crop residue to the soil. Organic matter affects the available water capacity, infiltration rate, and tilth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops. EROSION FACTOR K indicates the susceptibility of the whole soil (including rocks and rock fragments) to sheet and rill erosion by water. Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter (up to 4 percent) and on soil structure and permeability. Values of K range from 0.05 to 0.69. The higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. EROSION FACTOR Kf is like EROSION FACTOR K but it is for the fine-earth fraction of the soil. Rocks and rock fragments are not considered. EROSION FACTOR T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. • WIND ERODIBILITY GROUPS are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting their resistance to wind erosion in cultivated areas. The groups indicate the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion. Soils are grouped according to the following distinctions: 1. Coarse sands, sands, fine sands, and very fine sands. These soils are generally not suitable for crops. They are extremely erodible, and vegetation is difficult to establish. 2. Loamy coarse sands, loamy sands, loamy fine sands, loamy very fine sands, and sapric soil material. These soils are very highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 3. Coarse sandy loams, sandy loams, fine sandy loams, and very fine sandy loams. These soils are highly erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 4L. Calcareous loams, silt loams, clay loams, and silty clay loams. These soils are erodible. Crops can be grown if intensive measures to control wind erosion are used. 4. Clays, silty clays, noncalcareous clay loams, and silty • clay loams that are more than 35 percent clay. These soils are moderately erodible. Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 5 OF 5 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS Endnote -- PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued 5. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are less than 20 percent clay and sandy clay loams, sandy clays, and hemic soil material. These soils are slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if measures to control wind erosion are used. 6. Noncalcareous loams and silt loams that are more than 20 percent clay and noncalcareous clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay. These soils are very slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if ordinary measures to control wind erosion are used. 7. Silts, noncalcareous silty clay loams that are less than 35 percent clay, and fibric soil material. These soils are very slightly erodible. Crops can be grown if ordinary measures to control wind erosion are used. 8. Soils that are not subject to wind erosion because of coarse fragments on the surface or because of surface wetness. • The WIND ERODIBILITY INDEX is used in the wind erosion equation (WEQ). The index number indicates the amount of soil lost in tons per acre per year. The range of wind erodibility index numbers is 0 to 300. • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 • WATER FEATURES consultants Flooding I High water table and ponding I I i Map symbol (Hydro-1 I I I water I I I I Maximum and soil name Ilogic I Frequency I Duration I Months I table I Kind of I Months I Ponding I ponding Igroup I I I I depth Iwater tablel I duration I depth I I I I I I I I i I I I I I Ft I I I I Ft I I I I I I I I I 457A: I I I I I I I I I Turner----------I B INone I --- I --- 1 4.0-8.0 (Apparent I May-Aug I 1 I I I I I I I I I 51OB: I I I I I I I I I Meadowcreek-----I C INone I --- I --- 1 2.0-3.5 [Apparent I Apr-Jun I i I I I I I I I I I 537A: I I I I I I I I I Lamoose---------I D ]None 1 - I -- 1 1.0-2.0 (Apparent I Apr-Jul I --- I --- I I I I I I I I I 509B: I I I I I I I 1 11 Enbar-----------I B IRare ]Brief I JAN-JUL 1 2.0-3.5 ]Apparent I Apr-Jul I --- G I I I I I I I I I •48A: I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I B INone I --- I --- 1 >6.0 I I I I I I I I Beaverton-------I B INone I --- I --- 1 >6.0 1 --- I --- I --- I --- I I I I I I I I 448A: I I I I I I I I I Hyalite---------I B INone I --- I --- 1 4.0-8.0 (Apparent I May-Aug I --- [ I I I I I I I I i Beaverton-------I B [None 1 -- I -- ] 4.0-8.0 (Apparent I May-Aug I --- I I I I I I I I I I 542A: I I I ] I I I I I Blossberg-------I C INone I --- I --- 1 1.0-2.0 (Apparent I Apr-Jul I --- i • • • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 2 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 • WATER FEATURES Endnote -- WATER FEATURES This report gives estimates of various soil water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Hydrologic soil groups are used to estimate runoff from precipitation. Soils not protected by vegetation are assigned to one of four groups. They are grouped according to the infiltration of water when the soils are thoroughly wet and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group " All. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group "B". Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group "C". Soils having a slow infiltration rate when • thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group "D". Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a permanent high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to two hydrologic groups in this report, the first letter is for drained areas and.the second is for undrained areas. Flooding, the temporary inundation of an area, is caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, nor is water in swamps and marshes. This report gives the frequency and duration of flooding and the time of year when flooding is most likely. Frequency, duration, and probable dates of occurrence are estimated. Frequency is expressed as "None", "Rare", "Occasional", and "Frequent". "None" means that flooding is not probable; "Rare" that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions; "Occasional" that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years; and "Frequent" that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years. Duration is expressed as "Very brief" if less than 2 days, "Brief" if 2 to 7 days, "Long" if 7 to 30 days, and "Very long" if more than 30 days. The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; and absence of distinctive horizons that form in soils that are not subject to flooding. Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 3 OF 3 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 06/10/98 WATER FEATURES Endnote -- WATER FEATURES--Continued Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. High water table (seasonal) is the highest level of a saturated zone in the soil in most years. The depth to a seasonal high water table applies to undrained soils. The estimates are based mainly on the evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or mottles in the soil. Indicated in this report are the depth to the seasonal high water table; the kind of water table, that is, "Apparent", "Artesian", or "Perched"; and the months of the year that the water table commonly is high. A water table that is seasonally high for less than 1 month is not indicated in this report. An "Apparent" water table is a thick zone of free water in the soil. It is indicated by the level at which water stands in an uncased borehole after adequate time is allowed for adjustment in the surrounding soil. An "Artesian" water table exists under a hydrostatic beneath an impermeable layer. When the impermeable layer has been. penetrated by a cased borehole, the water rises. The final level of the water in the cased borehcle is characterized as an artesian water table. A "Perched" water table is water standing above an unsaturated zone. In places an upper, or "Perched", water table is separated from a lower one by a dry zone. Only saturated zones within a depth of about 6 feet are indicated. Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. The water is removed only by deep percolation, transpiration, evaporation, or a combination of these processes. This report gives the depth and duration of ponding and the time of year when ponding is most likely. Depth, duration, and probable dates of occurrence are estimated. Depth is expressed as the depth of ponded water in feet above the soil surface. Duration is expressed as "Very brief" if less than 2 days, "Brief" if 2 to 7 days, "Long" if 7 to 30 days, and "Very long" if more than 30 days. The information is based on the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic ponding and on local information about the extent and levels of ponding. • I I Agency Letters and Responses • ENGINEERS MOFMSR� SCIENTISTS INCUVEYORS SPLANNERS k MEaE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 .406.587.0721 • FAX:406-587-1176 • An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 Med Trans Montana Cliff Halls 2101 Industrial Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 3130.001.010.0310 Dear Cliff: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted B2), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District(Restricted B2) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and D reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century • ENGINEERS MORRISUI SCIENTISTS INC. SURVEYORS MAIERLE, IN 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587-0721 • FAX:4 6-5587-1R76 An Employee-Owned Company • June 14, 1998 Montana Power Co. Randy Sullivan P.O. Box 490 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 3130.001.010.0310 Dear Randy: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP).permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and • reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental D Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century 4 • ENGINEERS Moms* SCIENTISTS PLAN1INC. SURVEYORS ► irJ MAIERLE, I 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 .406.587-0721 • FAX:406-587N 176 • An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 State Historic Preservation Office 225 North Roberts Helena, MT 59620-9990 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 313 0.001.010.03 10 Dear Sir/Madam: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through #7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted B2)proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. D Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century ENGINEERS momso SCIENTISTS �w SURVEYORS PLANES ` AUERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 .406-587-0721 • FAX:406.587N 176 An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 TCI Cablevision of Montana, Inc. P.O. Box 1925 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 3130.001.010.0310 Dear Sir/Madam: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191): The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted B2), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through #7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business _.. District (Restricted B2) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. D Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS;lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century 11 • ENGINEERS MORMSM� SCIENTISTS LA- �- E��= SURVEYORS PLANNE?aERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406.587.0721 • FAX:406-587.11R76 • An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 US West Communications 2707 W. Main Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 3130.00 1.0 10.03 10 Dear Sir/Madam: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted B2), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn Beginning Our Second Half Century LiENGINEERS 1 MORRISU SCIENTISTS LA SURVEYORS PLANNES AGi. MAIERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 • 406-587-0721 • FAX:4 6-587-17 6 An Employee-Owned Company • June 14, 1998 Three Rivers Disposal P.O. Box 3588 Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 313 0.001.010.03 10 Dear Sir/Madam: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through #7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132) proposed. • A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century ,�, • ENGINEERS 3 r MORTIS SCIENTISTS 1*"< SURVEYORS MERLE, INC. PLANNERS 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 •406-587.0721 FAX:406-587.1176 . An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks 1400 S. 19th Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 3130.001.010.0310 Dear Dick: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot#1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted B2), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through #7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office I Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century • ENGINEERS LA41iMOFMSU SCIENTISTS L INC. SURVEYORS AWERLE, INC 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 .406-587-0721 • FAX:4 6-558-11R 6 An Employee-Owned Company • June 14, 1998 Natural Resources Conservation Service Gordon Hill 3710 Fallon Drive, Box B Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM# 313 0.001.010.03 10 Dear Gordon: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, . Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted B2), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business • . District (Restricted B2) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn Beginning Our Second Half Century �8 • ENGINEERS MOFMAk SCIENTISTS L1&' : INC. SURVEYORS PLANNE �� J ear ?aEFIE, INC 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 . 406.587-0721 • FAX:4 6-587-11R76 • An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 Montana Department of Transportation 907 N. Rouse Ave. Bozeman, Mt. 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 313 0.001.010.03 10 Dear Rob: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of.Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and D reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century i p : . ENGINEERS i d MORRISOT SCIENTISTS L1� INC. SURVEYORS �+-'� MAIERLE, INC 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 • 406-587.0721 • FAX:4 6-587N 176 An Employee-Owned Company • June 14, 1998 Bozeman Police Department 615 So. 16th St. Bozeman, Mt. 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 313 0.001.010.03 10 Dear Sir or Madam: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot#1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132)proposed. • A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. i Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century 4 g • ENGINEERS MORMSR� SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS PLANNERS MMERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD • P.O.BOX 1113 • BOZEMAN,MT 59771 • 406-587-0721 • FAX:4 6-587-176 • An Employee-Owned Company June 14, 1998 Bozeman Fire Department 34 N. rouse Ave. Bozeman, Mt. 59715 Re: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM # 313 0.001.010.03 10 Dear Sir or Madam: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision is located adjacent to the west side of the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza just west of the intersection of Cottonwood Road and Huffine Lane (Highway 191). The property lies in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Bozeman, Montana. The proposed lot configuration contains 7 lots on 17.56 acres. Lot #1 is Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132), Auto Sales proposed. Lots #2 through#7 are Business Park (BP) permitted with Community Business District (Restricted 132) proposed. A preapplication plan of Baxter Creek Business Park is enclosed for your review and reference. This letter of solicitation is being sent to you to inquire about possible impacts this proposed project may have on your facility. Your response will be incorporated in an Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement being prepared as part of the preliminary plat submittal. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Michael Smith, P.E. Bozeman Office Enclosure MS:lmn • Beginning Our Second Half Century • '' ���" i MAN POLICE DEPARTNl� �r Chief �,��soz Law & Justice Center Assistant Chief Mark Tyinrak - 9� 615 South 16th Avenue Bill Kayser _ Bozeman, MT 59715 • �`'''NCO.."�?�' (406) 582-2000 TDD/TTY 582-2001 FAX 582-2002 FROM: Bill Kayser Assistant Chief of Police TO: Morrison Maierle Inc. Attm Michael Smith PO Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 DATE: July 1, 1998 SUBJECT:Bazte�Creek 8:=6 s�in e­ss Park P.U.D. Subdivision Dear Mr. Smith, • After reviewing the proposed subdivision, I have several comments: 1. Again, as with any of the recently proposed subdivisions, response time to calls for service to this area would stretch our jurisdiction even more. With the current prioritization of calls, and no increase::in-manpower; I am very concerned with our ability to provide police protection to the subdivision after it is fully developed. 2. The master plan sketch did not show-any_tighting� I would encourage off street lighting of the area to discourage criminal activity especially since it is so isolated from the remainder of the City. If have any further questions, or, if I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me by phone or mail. Sincerely, Bill Kayser Assistant Chie of Police cc: Chief Tymrak • Serving Since April 12, 1883 • MCC Bozeman Fire Department �L, . !*,3 8 V i:j P.O. Box 640 Bozeman, Montana 59771-640 v.. -2350 -2355 TDD (406) 582-2301Phone (406) 582 • June 30, 1998 kli;hae1 Smith, F.E. ti-Ior icon Maierle, Inc. P.O. Box !113 Bozeman, MT 59771 KE: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement MM #3130.001.010.0310 Dea• Mr. Smith: In response to your letter dated June 14, 1998, I offer the following comments regarding the impact of Baxter Creek Business Park. This project currently the Bozeman Fire Department's five to seven minute . response area. As such, responses to fire and life-safety emergencies wi-1-1;b� e`s over l-h-an to other occupancies within the city. As a result, we-requ:re-that_all--commercial_strrlctures-he_protected, b pproved a tcomatic-f:re-s iinkler systems-to-minimize-the-threat-to-tlie-health-and-safety=of the public and emergency response personnel caused by excessive response times. This requirement will remain in effect until such a time as fire department response times can be reduced to meet the five to seven minute response time window. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact me at your convenience. Sinc rely, Chuck Winn Deputy Chief./Fire Marshal CW pw • Z: IREMARS'11avtrCra&Buwaik. pd Station 1 Station 2 Phone (406) 582-2350/Fax (406) 582-2355 Phone (406) 587-8770/Fax (406) 582-0439 THREE RIVERS DISPOSAL, INC. • • �`�� P. O. Box 3588 REC L! v';' ^' �: t y^^y Bozeman Montana 59772 (406)586-0606W. y<<_,io • June 22,1998 Morrison Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Blvd P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Mt. 59771 RE: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision MM#3130.001.010.310 Dear Sirs: Please be advised that our company is in a position to provide solid waste collection services for the Proposed Development. • If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. r " Since�'ely�`/ Dick Kountz l Assistant Gener 'Manager Dk/kv 0 Montana Owned and Operated TLMontana Historical Society • N Historic Preservation Office 1410 8th Avenue • PO Box 201202 • Helena,MT 59620-1202 • (406)444-7715 • FAX(406)444-6575 June 23, 1998 Michael Smith, P.E. Morrison Maierle, Inc. 901 Technology Blvd. P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: Cultural Resource File Search - Baxter Cr. Business Park PUD Subdivision MM#3130.001.010.0310, Sec. 9, T2S, R5E; GA Co. Dear Mr. Smith: I have conducted a cultural resource file search for the above cited legal location. Our records currently.<show„three historic-sites in the area:�24GA912M1ai`stor-ic-:home steadifarm 24GA712 the Htift=rn Residence site;anted 24GA8 9 tori s h`ool. If you wish to obtain further information on these sites you may contact the University of Montana Archaeological Records • Office at (406)-243-5525. Our records show that there have been'two-surveys executed, the Rea ,School by John N.Dehaas Jr. in October 1991 and the Byron Plt.tin Hon7e.stead-Addendum to Bozeman - West Inventory by Jon A. Arline in September 1991. If you need more information on these reports you may contact Cultural Records at the number listed below. Some of these sites have been moved. You may want to consult Derek Strahn at the Bozeman j� City-Co. Planning Office (406)-582-2372 to verify the current status of the sites in the area. We feel thauvvith_the amount_o.f de`velopmenf alreadyoccurrin2 in the project area-there_is_a_lo�%- �lil el-ihood-of-impact-on--cultur-ahpropert es---However, if cultural materials are encountered during the course of the project we would ask. h-�frour office be contacted. Thank you for consulting with us. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Cultural Records at (406)-444-7767 or by e- mail at pmelton@mt.gov. mt.gov. Sincerely, C•�7 i J01. 7 Connie Constan Cultural Records Intern File: Local Planning/Proposed Subdivision/Gallatin County/1998 • • P.O. BOX 490, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-0490 MONTANA POWER COMPANY RANDY SULLIVAN OPERATIONS MANAGER June 22, 1998 Mr. Michael Smith P.E. Morrison Maierle/CSSA P.O. Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1113 RE: Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D. Subdivision MM# 3130.001.010.0310 Dear Michael, Montana Power Company has reviewed the pre-application plan for the Baxter Creek • Business Park P.U.Df and will-provide electric and natural-gas service to,the.area along Competition Drive. Certain-road-crossings may-be required but no adverse impact-to- Company facilities will be experienced. Thank you for keeping us informed as this project develops. Very Truly Yours, v�9 Randy Sullivan Director of Division Operations TELEPHONE(406)586-1331 •FACSIMILE(406)585-9634 • ` � - �1�L ,,;•�,ii" (• �,-=�".`'� .c're rzkine television ir,ri, toniouou: ya TO Cablevision of Montana, Inc. • June 19,1998 Morrison Maierle Inc. 901 Technolog}-Blvd. Bozeman,MT. 59715 RE: Baxter Creek Business Park I have enclosed the location map You.sent to TO,with a red line to indicate where our cable is . T�able-is`I•ocated-3-feet o«ard=191-Off of-ihe fence There is 2 conduits collocated in the same trench at approximate 3�6inc`hes deep. Normally we do not feed a Subdivision like this unless there is interest from the deVeloper - for intended sen-ice . Thank you for letting us have the opportunely to comment on this. • Y g Sincerely, i Scott Riis,Loperations Supervisor 511 West Mendenhall P.O. Box 1925 Bozeman, PAT 59715.1925 (406) 586.2089 FAX (406) 586-6381 Aug-21 -98 08: 37 • • P . 01 RESPONSE-- AMERICAN MEDICAL August 21, 1998 Michael Smith, P.E. Morrison Maierle, Inc 901 Technology Blvd. Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 Fax 587-1176 Dear Michael, Having reviewed the proposed Baxter Creek Business Park pre-application plan, I find that! have only one comment, 1 do_not_beleve that this development_will have any lirnpacrupon our_facility, unless care is not taken to_make_sure_that_all accesses and -1 addresses-are`clearly marked'-and_well- 1]it. ---- Respectfully, y1 \ Daniel Lewis Operations Manager AMR-Bozeman • NORTHERN DISTRICT Billings Operation Center BOZernin Operation Center Rapid City Operation Center 11 4[h Ao:. nom, 2lu'1 nrnr' l lt)'W".xt I.irrtutp,, A9+'inr.ir.; aCr'Lr!1 U3'__ Lir?LCnluu.hlont,h:;5!;71.% 1lgiit�l(;nY. }inurr•I'r.r . r;, ".r i:il inQr;t ;�i'�.Siriitl irl('1Fi1 j�{(i UU:i; r:r;l:,: �:11•.i'li)l1 (:irj':i .,615 r.t536 F;ac it�i it _i.1'1•li:�`.',� F:r• Weed Management Plan • SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN (PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) Gallatin Count (Revised January 1999) Weed Gntrol Projected date for preliminary Plat application District Date Plan received Before construction/disturbance begins, please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board. This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District, and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board, this plan must be signed by the chairman of the Board and the person or agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Cooperator: rardi nPr Green, Jr. / Steve Olson (Print Full Name and/or Name of Company) P.O. Box 486 Laurel , MS 39441 (601) 649-7152 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2. Geographic Location to be Covered by this Plan: Legal Description: 1/4,S_1/4, Sec. 9. IT. 2 N/S, R. 5 E/W • If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision/Gravel PiUEtc: 3. Land Use (Please check the appropriate box(s)): (a) Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture ® Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain (b) Future Land Use Agriculture ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial © Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain Eight lot Auto-related commercial subdivision 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes ❑x No ❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan of and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes ® No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District? Yes ® No ❑ 7. Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County • Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes ® No ❑ 901 N. Black Bozeman, MT 59715 (406)582-3265 i • B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN. 1) Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes ❑ No ❑ If yes, list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s) Baxter Creek Business Park is approximately 17.5 acres. Due to snow cover, it is unknown what sQecjPs of ulpp_ds are present within the Qro.iect site. The weed management plan for this section will becompleted as weather permits (May - ,lump, 1999) (Gallatin County noxious weeds are listed in section III of Noxious Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s) to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/ disturbance of the property. Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property, please outline these infestations on a map of the area or the subdivision plat ................. None is planned at this time. When weather permits , this will be addrpssed for the site. 3. Please complete the appropriate section(s) corresponding to the noxious weed • management methods mentioned above. (a) Chemical Control: " Chemical Name Rate " Chemical Name Rate "Timing and method of treatment(s): " Soil Type: 537A - Lamoose S,H Loam; Ground Water Depth: 3.5 feet 510B - Meadow Cr k Loam "Weed control work done by- Self� or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: " Methods of weed control "Timing of control method(s): " Weed control work done by- Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor (c) Biological Control: " Biological control agent(s) Timing of the release(s) of the Bio-control agent(s): Weed control method(s) used to control weed spread while insects establish............................. • "Weed control work done by- Self❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor 1 WETLAND DELINEATION 1 BAXTE'R CREEK BUSINESS PARK BOZEMAN, MONTANA 1 Prepared for: ' GARDINER GREEN, JR AND MORRISON MAIERLE, INC. 901 TECHNOLOGY BLVD. ' BOZEMAN, MT OFFICES 59715 1 1 �7 "'� red-- - - .'.�,:�'--•-=�- "`'� " �-�'4.xr- T- Lv..a; :'°k. -...�` 5h!'...rQ4�i `..}_L.�.�•.— -rRS"a- �..r2�R Prepared by: 1 Please Return To WETLANDS CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE EST, INC. 20 E. OLIVE 1 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 Bozeman, Montana May 1998 r-J2CEIVI_D By 1AR 3 1989 1 QTY•COMITY PLhtt,,.; 1 � � Baxter Creek Business Park Page i ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 ' 1.1 ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS...........................................................................1 ' 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY............................................................2 3.1 EXISTING DATA REVIEW..........................................................................6 3.2 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION................................... 3.2.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation.........................................................................7 ' 3.2.2 Hydric Soils.................................................................................. *......7 3.2.3 Wetland Hydrology.................................................................................8 3.2.4 Artificial Wetland Hydrology..................................................................8 3.3 WETLAND DETERMINATION....................................................................8 3.4 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS.................................................................9 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................10 ' 4.1 RIVERINE WETLAND W-1 ............ ..... . ' 4.1.1 Vegetation ... ..............................................................10 4.1.2 Soils . ........................ ... .10 4.1.3 Hydrology............................................................................................12 ' 4.2 NEBRASKA SEDGE AND WET MEADOW COMPLEX (W-2).................12 4.2.1 Vegetation............................................................................................12 ' 4.2.2 Soils ......... .... .12 .. ..... ....................................... 4.2.3 Hydrology................ ..................... ... . .13 4.3 NEBRASKA SEDGE MEADOW(W-3) .....................................................14 4.3.1 Vegetation............................................................................................14 4.3.2 Soils ....................................................................................................14 ' 4.3.3 Hydrology............................................................................................14 4.4 SEDGE MARSH AND ASSOCIATED DITCH (W-4).................................14 ' 4.4.1 Vegetation............................................................................................15 4.4.2 Soils ....................................................................................................15 4.4.3 Hydrology............................................................................................15 1 . 1 � � Baxter Creek Business Park Page ii Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT"D) i SECTION PAGE 4.5 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT RESULTS................................................15 4.5.1. Wetland Categories ...........................................................................16 1 5.0 SUMMARY...................................................................................................17 EXHIBIT A PROJECT AREA MAP WITH WETLAND BOUNDARIES i APPENDIX A DATA SHEETS APPENDIX B FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS 1 1 I, 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 . Baxter Creek Business Park Page iii Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURES PAGE Figure 2.1. Location of the Baxter Creek Business Park, USGS .........................3- 1 Figure 2.2 Aerial photograph of Baxter "Creek" taken in 1992. ...........................4 Figure 2.3 Aerial photograph of the proposed site of the Baxter Creek Business Park taken in 1998........................................................................5 ' LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTOGRAPH PAGE 1 Photograph 4.1. The Billion sub-drain ditch outlet (W-1)...................................11 Photograph 4.2. Baxter "Creek" (W-1).. .............................................................11 Photograph 4.3. Nebraska and Beaked Sedge Wet Meadow ' Complex (W-2)...........................................................................................13 Photograph 4.4. Sedge Marsh and Associated Ditch (W-4). .............................15 1 1 1 • Baxter Creek Business Park Page 1 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 ' 1 .0 INTRODUCTION ' In compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act and the Gallatin Valley Subdivision Regulations, a wetland delineation was conducted in April 1998 by Wetlands West, Inc. for Gardiner Green, Jr. and Morrison Maierle, Inc. The ' wetlands were surveyed and mapped by Morrison Maierle, Inc.; the subject property encompasses approximately 18.71 acres. ' The objective of the investigation was to provide the property owners, and other interested parties, with a wetland delineation describing the presence and extent of wetlands. The technical criteria outlined in the Corps of Engineers ' (COE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (WTI 91-2, 1991) was used to classify hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. A Routine, Level- 2-Determination Method of wetland delineation was'chosen to provide qualitative data. A map of delineated wetlands is included as Exhibit A; sample points are shown on the wetland map. The vegetation composition, soil characteristics and ' hydrology were assessed at each location. The results, wetland types, locations, and acreage of wetlands are included in this report. ' 1.1 ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) of Gallatin County, at the request of the City Planning office, has produced a Bozeman Area Wetland map. This map, although not accurate at small scales nor inclusive or all wetlands, does provide the City/County planners with a useful tool by which ' to assess proposed project sites. This map shows the wetlands throughout the Baxter Creek Business Park to contain only "artificial" wetlands. ' The Bozeman Area Wetlands were mapped based on approved off-site mapping conventions written for use under the 1985 Food Security Act (FSA) and 1990 Food and Agriculture Commodities Trade Act (FACTA). The off-site conventions were developed and approved by the COE, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), US Fish and Wildlife (USFW) and the NRCS per the 1994 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between these agencies. Designation of these wetlands as artificial by the NRCS was made because artificial wetlands are exempt from FSA/FACTA rules relative to agricultural alteration, but may still be protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Only the Corps can make that determination. The artificial ' designation of the project's wetlands support the supposition that the wetlands within the project site are "irrigation-induced" and may be of a lower quality than the City's mapped natural wetlands; none of which are included within the . project site. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 2 Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 ' 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The Baxter Creek Business Park is located in the Gallatin Valley adjacent to the Billion Auto Plaza on Huffine Lane (U.S. 191). The site is in the process of annexation into the Bozeman City limits and will be connected to public sewer and water. The property encompasses 18.71 acres in the SE 1/4, Section 9, ' Township 2 South, Range 5 East (Figure 2.1). The property spans a low stream terrace, bottomland, and pastureland, which has been used primarily for crop production. 2.1 PROJECT WATERWAYS ' Three waterways are located on the property, one semi-natural, the Baxter Creek stream/ditch combination, and two artificial, a sub-drainage outlet ditch and a culverted ditch on Highway 191 (Exhibit A). Baxter "Creek" enters ' the property at the southeast boundary and exits at the center of the northern boundary. The sub-drain ditch drains water from the J. C. Billion property to the east and enters the property toward the north-eastern boundary. The ditch joins Baxter Creek where the creek exits the property. The culvert ditch enters the property toward the south-western boundary; the hydrology arrises from a seep ' on the south side of U.S. 191. The water pools slightly immediately after exiting the culvert, then flows north along a narrow shallow ditch. The ditch exits the property at the northwestern corner of the property. Baxter Creek has been historically straightened. The 1992 aerial photograph (Figure 2.2) shows that the creek formerly meandered 50 - 100 feet ' west of its present-day location (Figure 2.3). The creek now flows in nearly a straight line within the property boundary. A berm along the eastern bank of the creek measures about 12 feet from the water surface; this is the material removed from the channel during rechannel ization. 1 Baxter Creek Busine4ark Page 3 r Wetlands West , Inc. May 1998 1 , 1 a 38 i 4 _ 5 — — — _G I I78� 5 OURSTON ROAD 1 4'757 u a. ` ee • I �evt W ,�e ►a�O�di'v(a'ld'- .,.z 1 ?. Q 1 4786AT — 1 = x qB T J I Fc.�i�ro �j o ain W o: I _ 1 I g 48� T US91 191 i ° •, Po.k _ IJ'Sev/ugc C' 's'.Ii — Pa'.ds — f.:. b i •9859AT�� FARMERS 1 II II II n I'�u fl n 1 4881 Fig uTO 2.1. Location of the Baxter Creek Business Park (1USGS 1 Bozeman, MT y 1937). 1 �.:. •r.. tins y .',.E f•y r`r, ,'j^ "IAW x 3� ` ,t7ifj fj A kT�,'i�. d .F .'i71+ +,li �`3L�YUi � J •[f. •Q�,ff�> r'` ;�j II �•1•t � : ��'�� �_�_��_rr,�,..4 "ate 7 rr M L iY• r�x r. + ew- +a+�2 NRr'>'�g'•�` 1r Cti+ , "t`�r•,�•ar ,,.F. ia'i�ya_f, i`y,�kys;Q�'�` �.v� r� 3 5� ...1 �'•�x>l� a%�r� �r» 4'a.. '•.Y�tF'bMlt }t•�+� 'G*. .' ei"� ¢ ,t• + r r• � 2 fi s.: W. MIA. tt ` ` ,� �.91',T�.s y� t ��'�`.;� r 'c ,y.,yy�� f 5 �• •� �.1,•j scY'�,. .5�"RL, t,'�. .r tP+i,}�.};��.r a' n kc Y <¢y' ( 1% '' 1•• i i.k•��_i 4 �� t y,y p�'�' �`'f`ki� ,I�•y��',�,�.s j .-5..��#` 4. pTgt� 1 'f�}' �'� C �j�j� � �1 �:t1 �'t• i�it'}`"3 Sw' ?��,.�•.y�` . � �+,+1,r_ 4r•SfJ ''nw,r�. '(ir '�i� �qy����'�'� �`��. .�' _ `^av,r+:., j•� •� '+'�.,t�1�y,'-yy e:r`�. natm, {r h.6's"i.�'"F uf", 'v ,}'3 t ,c�` R' { ,+'. +•. ' '}�lt7 .•'.hub t s.e+"iy3.13• y p ''• s. 'ti 1 r '}xd`34 -. r: "z. ��.. i1 'E ('"�+i#r`�S'N,f+�Zr'�'3C'' 7..•`�i rS, ,�tt•�w} a"-����.r�i"�#' ,�i� �, �r�f>.,x ;t ✓ ,a. g �t<a�j � a j sty�r"'"c } "' ' ' ` +.i�`����� Y4 ,�!•� ��� t �- t. -4�"�t••Sry1 ,u. ��r��� �a �'� .�"-`L�.•�3�� � '�` � 'P �a: '�'A•� .::liv t 't",- 3 �> th' r�3 t. aR'/t tti'f x, r r,;.;•-, a " '� '+ , ,at' �R #`tT`�.PF,vi7$`9�r��+a� f, S �-rc••'aj..��� .� }�J'y+ 3�x�''r �c .�r�' ,�3�`�1.- 3> 9 fy 3 t>r'r'•!. jC •�`e f�`•.s '� k r-" cr �7 �,fl� Ail, r*` t✓.? r� .tl�.r zR,tki �`.}�.tr r ,pJ� J' + m 3: 4 .a' ��Ti .-_s.y"` / p Re tr!S Y o tr^t- •f 4 i t if uJ a•� _�.'A ix {t. ��i�4��a����c`� .'C� f `cL+ tiV�,J � j tiaa...� #i r�F•r^ rr t�A �t � t�*i s,-may±' "St.51z �rr��� �IA } (F_ kt i > 4 y 11,��-�ll� !rY��vYe� •r"5,�� y'��� e�- �t+ i t Mill'W '!411 x 3[ a �r• t a� r r� F`�' y .•>.^s ,✓. v + f c i � `+ yuSig it �rk yk Y S esb .• . ' T ^ sa+"r`�t�� P -- �L"� �� S 1 ',4+z• � ", ,, 'N.+tf V'4r�'. `ML: •F � '.k,'' �' ' wtri�"'•b'-� , T �� �,j$d� '+.•v � .�1..� �• �� �jlrti g s yt��;.�i«!"�f1 ��� .y", :zf E: � 1 �i J f��t Ii,` � Jl��t{• S h1 r',:. t '�'+j. y r Y T �'Y°�`�SI�TG•r � e�"' ..•.,. '� f]? 1 y, ' `�r`ifpJ�1 •i K`b�'r , � �ir��,'�y'.���s.Ntic�-��,��L s� f,$,�`" - � t ,•>-"'`rt" .r 4 �,,��5rr. r�,,�a 4` F Ur jrR ;, k• u is h aaa. � � ,, r. ,•��, t f' � �� �� Y�y, ,p Is"�+�ti< i {:. f z '. .lt vJ" 'Y^.,#f a3�,�'.,`,' .••.�l�t."vr :.� ..LL K 4�,p.G� ✓ Y _ pi,•YrM yr>�, iY��•• t l apt[[ I 'v� e r'int'•+ r 5-� 5 .s��"h red .. '`�` _ t; t �''• .'�R".F�'�e1 t i �� $y �r`5 ,���, .� c�ti�ia= �^•%L�.`� y.r c�at,' �W� , ', - 'a�� w itt'y�+ x "�.�1 .i t� r icy r.)t� F>:-J�} �r��,r;Sy'Y t� ^3�t@s•f �- '�"t -7� �'Vt.# t zs•'Y ar a�r��3�„i.c A < -�a � II %1 r+����' ���.��- y���a����% t�;,1�.¢t.,� _y,• �,, }t}� w���s��Ta �Ns,., 4� y1�• I-R A Ill y ItNt,�' ,A&R'�' � t 'c T`$„ys �"�','•as�5..•I f 7. •� Nx.•� `i "t l n Y 1, ' • dy .,v4 r Sr'' >•zw r •z t < l 'd 1j• rC 'y r r v +�. L }'12C. '+-' •,n`t L e '��`d ,s ' '�r y.t`.�xJr�r.£ H ,,. 571 non - 3X •~.f�fi�'t�:�rzSF�t;,t {y�4" cf `�a - �t� i�?�•. ,.�q r•• r,till•ar� r � EN, stir, y r{j� yp7p .jp !'� � "� ° my �` , �. ,.+i+• �b '�yt t �` �'- 1 (• •� y+ 3" } " , 5��."',: r+t�yt �' lk >R. 4 ?�••���1a��`' '�' �•: g o '3' ,�,�,(�" r� � - �*`-.•k ^�5• ° '�• P>'a, y x� i z i a a r}"r+!a RCt 2 .$ 1 ! r,;r r ••arvjj ,,.s y r y+ i� pr s s1 ; laF s 3rMy j .t `F rZ1 di' ci • dl�r.,r",u C V;3.� a >t�7 , '�� � .x.vk'7 "v'r�� .'xs. - _ 'fin J$ r`- d' Z !"+`'' y` ' "�j,^ ~ t � -r•-" sic•��' 'M > 3 F' a"'7 t � t �+ �1�'P{{a'.}s�R `�'�•^it'� '1••�°"�• r�`�"��,a �•_y,�}s1 ��^ ,�}1t`,�' �3. 'I'.�..r7 � �' ` � � �� s t L �.yv;� t� aMi�t��9�t ,r�R`L.ij"�_ -i �r ad•'b'w's� -,}, w •• r'6` >Rt �� � a j�ri+,ph 0 WL'+� �at'`��+',�' � r�±�,, s'i r ' z{7� l.^a.• "3:'S iY""')1 r fl 7 t Z,T t ai4 Y- 4sa't •.w - r l� FU `6f+� ti a ,r"t ' r 'i-firkJw,. t" iti�a �r t zt' �•, f��(YCyzr .+, 's , - , r r!.� ���L•�'rtJ�i� ��L��s���ii� `�S rbj. �-R'3cki• � i}��«r�i � .\.� , � s Y 1 Y �rYj,r}�Iw , ..�V'U >j L ��3>t°"L R�'�' !} ar''�it.4x 1 W".1-WWII 'sr4n� 'c°1 3�°.t<-•1 y V - u d� >r� f~•i, 42 4 (`R•.rp` '1 y7 9j. ate .+C•i+T77`�`l', 't a 1 a',v,,q+��r����r �w�r�F,� •�i'S�.� '}r{'��+rr .c '*, r,s�� to c� .1�5 � y�' fi•7:31"`w'�u'7 '2.Ts��a �' �'�-Y"'.•Y• � a�• ��•,'•�d`t^�Se...��r� Ky�„�`w" �`-_ . :uN�•.� •�y 6'W�Ila,•iIUS`�i:.V J_} C� �r - '�-�5 -•'2K"s l�Lea��tY'k1�.'fi�•�T �4[ ACY. L.?+SSc'tit lG�L.A.iLL::]I t t�N.9 ; +3 •��:,�. .n,�- rt•Ma.t+RL>TF14->e-rt J+.e.,arur t anz•.�✓ �n{"+T'•'{`,�t`'� �`QY,� "�•tr�4'r� €^'� �- `.�t `��^+a,5'�_�"- "�mu;,��s—�=;.�"'"�'Cr�' � rr� "+�t-_..�I,q',I irR^41+•.Y'v-u"i'". iF1k y ,> ..�'="'ate ...... - r . '�%+e.:...,s:r"�2�,.r.:'3 -��'.�K..� :�.._?^s_ r �.--�:...,,g,>,v,�s�,s;,,.. _ •��•s'--a..o..,. ,..y,*. 1=t�;'•ttre• �- � �•'.c rival )a}nmic+y'rr.3Eu)1 a;! F3rrr:i ,•• r ( re.r ;:. i .r, ia.eul ir,': I "?('1y,- 'ia�tr• Y L3 �9 t la r.. < r c.,c• _• }1 i; t ur r 3 c r.;1 1�' a. rr: 1 ca t r:i t irl 1 in t 13,•• e�t :,t 1.1 i 3 t z ��r r s �, r 3 t cj�°3�' i a:r sa t i,•t r 3 �r,° {< t t uI F�i t_r,i 3 r t• � ;�. r r .c .� � t.�� FuY,�,,�'��Via+-�'�� a 7t'�•4d'Y�T�� �'�� - �o-�• t7$ry �, �5���'4'-3•• ��L�-�t�"_.���rct .�'i N'�"i •'�'�� _ �'-' �.y�`9'�-�x1,t3-cF�y�e�-i•e���n�c-s�'-T�'_.� '�i���g�..t7�ti f - - 'mac".}i�s x�=i2-_ _ 7, ��-_ �y�l�'s��ly � - •'.�-.r'._ .____• y a tix -^r- �� .c. 7' � 11ta�is�t a$' -r i' t. .^x.- i •� �c._�^^._-•,—',,,�•._'. J t1 •-7•..�--.-"._.�"."a_..i�t. �q_ �41a, a ..i .mTv,., t`h���� �.�- ��� � Fss "�la _ Tq� � *- �F.wlu" =ram.-_.'�_..•__ , .••s.+•1? Efffi{3_ `e .^•-__`- _ ��yr4c- ry3; � �rti. -T t �r^tl r -�•l._- �� ,y .�•-}tTf...+y.. _...- ¢� H �1�,�'.'" � tY `4 - ���t '--.,..� A�rlryurr�D ���"^_-Yar��2x�...t! •J�� }, �v�}t' T t- mig M1��fl-a�.�ayl �w"���r t�•"'`'`z• �t b' �= ---��., :� �r�.'a'`ti-•,�a.4%���c.'�s t ➢-," '>x'iv t*',�1�I��1 `c+[9 Tl:, �?_ II t i'� t 25 WEI s:r� FFs�I•�;P _--s'..s+ -��cS� �)�` �-�.xs�•'t•'�`�i. '�'e t fSl , �'S 4 ,,.., _..a. .- .� x����5�S(� _ ^"��"�� �s-��y.. �- --'t^•."�:�''���1 ,x's'�� � }` `mac-�, -•- +15�?�tu�l ,,�i"_''t� ���s.•a`Y� _:_ ---rai'�j�jt_ t j,, °' � --.. �I :� �.•'� (I 'rr�'.' '"k' -'lb�+�1'3. ^aY - � 7s�' .S. 1�' / R�4d'c , '`"^ t.�r t�'.s• yi"r Tag"-��__. �i if �- ed�} ,�'yS�R '�'F ���'t'��ir'"y�ltF,��� I � x 0"`•�,a��� --'� .+.. � t'7{ta�� i.� ��S °+St-. °��^—cam ice' ' � '"` -•t+ ..�'.� -r'ic+" t .a. `�w *.... - s � — �''C r`r��s'�ia'rT•*4'�-;-'-���`��7" ���� -"�=n` s„` �,_ .},�T�i- �.L'.G"s.F ` •r X` "�il-..F�'s��-' —...s 4' `"`r � '+ rr� ,,,,. .Y�y may -•-•-x. . a— evr s -tom - I'm 'E'ER'! 7� ~ � �'%�� ...d'�'--'-_'.�..,� +r� �y�•tt��C�'..�+u��.u�?+.� � ,'�iT...Cc�� r �.t.-�s�.-r.>`'rys�,��--c/�' vf�i:�F�i `.i 'Ss--i•'+._. }c�r� �_�_��J� r���+tr-��r".''e__.�...a,. x�k•-.l,r�f'�'' '*1'�n�3� � �� �;sT--'_� ti -^•-z.�-�c,.� �L x-:=+. •4 rs'Y G .cr rc. Y''t.zt Y h• c-�.��'�....,-�.ss�s=a=�' � <. i o - t- ' trrt:il altio>tte� rr::�st}i �.;I 1lut- 1•;ts;irr (-rt•e ;� f-it�_ iu�e �.:. I''rari; t - ,:c,..tt iti 1 `qa,.'_. ''iatit�• iLt:ai i ��}t� �afr .e• r:P cits�' lcot-ratiton a( 1lns. t �t-c• 't: it. t <.ti jt'. h;i :twr;c� i�.ttrit i(•tti (ra°.f�t_r �tttac !:: 1c.� i` ig',ure- '_ �'�. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 6 Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 3.0 METHODS The wetlands delineation conducted was based on methodology ' developed by the COE, and other federal agencies, for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The investigation consisted of reviewing existing site-specific information and on-site inspection. and sampling using the Routine Determination Method outlined in Field Guide for Wetland Delineation 1987 COE Manual (WTI 91-2, 1991). 1 3.1 EXISTING DATA REVIEW Various data sources were reviewed to gather preliminary information on vegetation, soils, and hydrologic characteristics of the site prior to the property investigation. The following resource documents were reviewed: ' • Aerial Photographs (1992 and 1998). • Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Survey Data. • Gallatin County Hydric Soil Map Unit List. • National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Montana(Reed, 1988). • 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). ' • Plant Species of Special Concern Gallatin County: Montana Natural Heritage Program. ' • Munsell Soil Color(1988). • Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Streams and Ditches of the City of Bozeman (1993). • Montana Department of Transportation, Montana Wetland Field Evaluation Form and Instructions, 1996. ' • Bozeman Area Wetlands Map, Critical Lands Study, City-County Planning Board (1994). ' 3.2 ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION A Routine, Level-2 Determination Method was utilized for the wetland delineation at the Baxter Creek Business Park project site. Field work began by traversing the property identifying plant communities, waterways, and property characteristics. Soil pits were established in locations to identify the interface ' between upland and wetland areas. Data collected at the soil pits were recorded on data sheets and are included as Appendix A. The locations of the soil pits (SP) are indicated on the map in Exhibit A. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 7 Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 ' 3.2.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Plants must be physiologically or morphologically adapted for life under saturated or anaerobic soil conditions to grow in wetlands. The COE and the US Fish and Wildlife Service have determined the estimated probability of each plant species occurrence in wetlands, and have assigned an "indicator" status to each species to reflect their findings. Accordingly, plants may be categorized as obligate (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC),.facultative upland (FACU), or upland (UPL). Species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW or FAC are considered adapted for life in saturated or anaerobic soil conditions. A sample plot is considered to have wetland vegetation if more than 50% of the number of dominant species present, within each stratum, have an indicator status of FAC, FACW, or OBL. ' At each sampling location, the vegetation data was collected by estimating the cover of each plant species occurring at that location. The species composition and percent cover were recorded on the data forms. All species within the sampling plot were recorded in descending order of abundance and dominant species were determined. The dominant species represent 50% of the areal cover for each vegetative stratum. The indicator ' status of the species within each vegetation stratum was used to determine the prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation. 3.2.2 Hydric Soils Hydric soils are defined as "soils that are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions,in the upper part of the soil profile" (USDA National Resource Conservation Service [NRCS, formerly the SCS], 1987). Soil is saturated when the capillary fringe occurs within the major portion of the root zone (within 12 inches of the surface). The Natural Resource Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS), has compiled a list of hydric soils in the United States. The list identifies soil series mapped by the SCS that meet hydric criteria. ' Hydric soils exhibit certain physical characteristics that can be observed in the field. These characteristics, or indicators, include: high organic content, accumulation of sulfides, greenish or bluish gray color (gley formation), mottling, and dark soil colors (low soil chroma). Organic content is estimated visually and texturally, sulfitic material is determined by the odor of sulfide gases, and soil colors are determined by using a Munsell soil color chart (Munsell Color 1988). ' Areas that readilyexhibited wetland or upland conditions were sampled at P P ' an intensity sufficient to determine the break point between wetland and uplands. In areas where hydrophytic vegetation was present, soil pits were also i • • Baxter Creek Business Park Page 8 1 Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 ' dug to determine the presence of hydric soils. Several soil pits were dug to determine wetland and upland boundaries. The pits were excavated to a depth of eighteen (18) inches, where possible. ' 3.2.3 Wetland Hydrology Y 9Y ' The technical criteria for wetland hydrology guidelines have been established as "permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation for a significant period (five to twelve days in the Gallatin Valley) during the growing season". Wetland hydrology may be supplied by surface water, groundwater, and/or direct precipitation. ' Areas were examined for visual indicators of wetland hydrology including areas of ponding or soil saturation, evidence of previous water inundation or saturation, rhizospheres, soil mottling, and drainage patterns. Indicators were examined at each sampling point. ' 3.2.4 Artificial Wetland Hydrology The NRCS designates natural wetlands as those wetlands occurring as a result of natural conditions and artificial wetlands as those resulting from human ' activity. This human activity can be from irrigation structures, ditches, and artificial waterways which provide localized hydrology sufficient to have allowed wetland characteristics to develop. As growth in the Gallatin Valley continues and the land use changes from agricultural to residential, the old patterns of water use become apparent. Fields which once needed the water for crops and livestock are now being zoned residential. Baxter "Creek " within the Baxter Creek Business Park property has been altered since 1992; the stream bed was dredged and straightened. The J.C. Billion sub-drain ditch was also recently ' excavated. As a consequence, wetland vegetation has established in and in close proximity to these waterways (W-1; refer to section 4.1). In addition, hydrophytic vegetation proliferates in the area of the old stream-bed (W-2; refer to section 4.2). 3.3 WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Vegetation, soil, and hydrology data for each sampling point are examined to determine the presence or absence of wetlands. If all three parameters exhibit wetland characteristics, a positive wetland determination is made for that area of homogeneous vegetation cover represented by the sampling plot. (That wetland may or may not, however, be jurisdictional.) If any ' one of the parameters does not exhibit positive wetland indicators, the area is determined to be non-wetland per the 1987 COE manual. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 9 Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 3.4 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS Functions of wetlands exist in the absence of man and are normally part ' of a self-sustaining ecosystem. Functions are the observable and measurable, inherent characteristics of aquatic ecosystems that maintain or have an influence upon the system itself. The functional value of wetlands include ' groundwater recharge and discharge; sediment trapping; nutrient retention and removal; food chain support; wildlife and fish habitat; and heritage values including recreation. A specific wetland may perform some, or all, functions ' assessed. Various evaluation systems have been designed for assessment, however, per the Montana Wetland Council's consensus, the evaluation agreed upon is the Montana Department of Transportation's (MDT) revised form. The functional assessment evaluation provides a numerical wetland category for each wetland type based on the criteria listed above. Functional ' assessments were performed on two wetland types, W-1 and W-2, after the wetlands were delineated. The same assessments were re-evaluated for post- mitigation purposes. The assessment results are discussed in Section 4.4; the completed assessment forms are included as Appendix B. i • Baxter Creek Business Park Page 10 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 4.0 RESULTS 1 The investigation resulted in the identification of four wetland types within the project boundary. Wetland habitat types are based on their similarity physiographically, hydrologically, and by plant community associations. The three wetland types comprise 3.57 acres for the project (Exhibit A). Each wetland type (W) is discussed below. 4.1 RIVERINE WETLAND (W-1) The riverine wetland includes the created Billion sub-drainage outlet ditch and the affected Baxter Creek (Photos 4.1 and 4.2, respectively). The riverine ' wetland, including channels and associated emergent wetlands, comprises 0.29 acres or 8% of the project wetlands. The wetland type represented by the creek and ditch channels is classified as a riverine system, upper perennial (cobble ' bottom and 'high' velocity), unconsolidated bottom (cobble-gravel) and aquatic bed, and is permanently flooded (Cowardin et al. 1979). The marsh areas associated with the Baxter Creek channel are classified as palustrine, persistent emergent, and are permanently to seasonally flooded, or saturated (Cowardin et al. 1979). ' 4.1.1 Vegetation The Billion sub-drain outlet ditch has very little associated emergent ' wetland vegetation along its borders, whereas Baxter Creek includes small areas along the waterway comprised of beaked sedge (Carex rostrata, OBL), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, OBL), and cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL). Duck weed (Lemna spp., OBL) and wild-celery (Vallisneria americana, OBL) aquatic vegetation were noted in both waterways. No shrub species grow along the creek or ditch, and only two young cottonwoods (Populus spp.) are ' currently growing along Baxter Creek. These cottonwoods were planted by Billion during their landscaping efforts. ' Adjacent to the riverine wetland along Baxter Creek, particularly on the north-western end of the creek, are areas of inundation comprised primarily of ' Carex species. Along the banks of the creek patches of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW) proliferate. There is also a small area (< 0.01 acre) adjacent to Billion's storm drainage outlet which supports cattail. 4.1.2 Soils ' No soil pit was excavated in W-1 due to obvious inundation from flowing water. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 11 Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 y x ... 16 Photograph 4.1. The Billion sub-drain ditch outlet (W-1). View is to ' the NW. 1 Sla t +� ' Photograph 4.2. The Banter Creek (W-1). View is to the south. Dote the berm on the east side of the creek (left side in photo) from ' channelization activities. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 12 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 4.1.3 Hydrology The hydrology is supported by Baxter Creek and the sub-drain outlet ditch ' which drains water from the J. C. Billion property to the east. ' 4.2 NEBRASKA SEDGE AND WET MEADOW COMPLEX (W-2) The wet meadow complex represents 83% of the wetlands on the property (2.97 acres). The wetland extends from the west side of Baxter Creek to the edge of the plowed field where the land levels (Photo 4.3). Baxter Creek enters the property at the southeast boundary and exits at the center of the northern ' boundary. This wetland is classified as palustrine, emergent wetland, persistent, and saturated to seasonally flooded (Cowardin 1979). 4.2.1 Vegetation The wet meadow complex is an interesting mixture of hydrophytic and upland vegetation. Aerial photographs taken in 1992 indicate that Baxter Creek flowed through a portion of what is now this wet meadow complex. The historic P P channel is visible from aerial photographs (Figure 2.3). The dominant vegetation in W- is Nebraska d ea e eg n 2 b k an beaked sedge (Carex nebraskensis and C. rostrata, OBL), particularly adjacent and within the historic' ' creek channel. Dispersed throughout the wetland is a considerable amount of upland vegetation, including timothy (Phleum pratense, FACU), thistle (Circium ' undulatum, FACU+), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis, FACU+). The widespread dispersal of upland vegetation suggests that sufficient drying occurs throughout the site to support opportunistic species, such as blue grass and ' timothy. These upland species are more prevalent up-gradient toward the plowed field. A small area of upland (0.08 acre) was delineated out of the complex due to the absence of hydrophytes. ' 4.2.2 Soils Two soil pits (SP) were established for data collection. Several other pits ' were dug to identify the precise boundary of upland and wetland; the wide dispersal of upland vegetation suggests that the soils and hydrology were ' insufficient to support hydrophytic vegetation. As mentioned above, one small area was classified as an upland inclusion within'the wetland due to the absence of hydric soils and hydrophytic vegetation. The soils within the wetland boundary are classified as Typic Haplaquoll. The major component is the hydric Lamoose series (537A), with inclusions of hydric bone Basin. Busin*Park Page 13 Baxter Creek g ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 [r..�. =a..+7,� 1 .. .e�-v`:'Mt •.lk �, /•-t+yutY'�V" - 1!� Z f 'tie F�'►=i'T r w. ..Z,.: Ali 4ti 1 t "�'•>�('� :ty„ ' -ti'+t-e�-,S"3.!� �..� 5.,., +ibr.ce�is�` a ': �-a a'�'t3}�K ' Photograph 4.3. Nebraska and Beatied Sedge Net Meadow Com len g P ' (W-2). View is to the south. The soil observed in SP -2 was very dark brown (10 YR 2/1) from 0-16". ' At a depth of 11" few/fine red mottles (7.5 YR 4/6) were observed. The inclusions of mottling at a depth of 11" confirms the presence of hydric soils. ' The soil pit revealed similar characteristics to the NRCS descriptions, primarily that the coloration was of a dark gray-brown to a depth of 9-11". Gravel was reached at a depth of 14". The upland inclusion within the wetland boundary ' also had very dark brown soils, but without mottling to a depth of 16". 4.2.3 Hydrology The Bozeman Area Wetland Map produced by the NRCS shows the wetlands throughout the Baxter Creek Business Park property as "artifical" wetlands. The former location of Baxter Creek historically supplied some of the hydrology for W-2. Within two feet of the existing creek and at the confluence of the Billion sub-drain ditch, the waterways currently supply the hydrology. The wetland is also downslope and east of the tilled field, and therefore the area is ' likely receiving ground and surface water flows, in addition to potentially having a slower rate of evaporation due to the east/northeast-facing aspect. The ' ground was saturated in many areas and some puddling was observed, although no free water was observed in SP-2. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 14 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 ' 4.3 NEBRASKA SEDGE MEADOW (W-3) This sedge meadow patch is considerably drier than W-2 and is located in the northwest corner of the property. It is the smallest wetland on the project (0.06 acres), representing 2% of the total wetland acreage. This wetland is classified as palustrine, persistent emergent wetland, and temporarily flooded ' (Cowardin 1979). 4.3.1 Vegetation ' Nebraska sedge was the primary hydric vegetation indicator within W-3. Upland species dispersed throughout this small wetland included Kentucky ' bluegrass and smooth brome (Bromus inermis). 4.3.2 Soils No soil pit was excavated in this area. The soil has been mapped as the hydric Lamoose series already discussed in Section 4.2.2. ' 4.3.3 Hydrology The source of hydrology is likely a seepage from a small trench along the ' western property boundary and immediately adjacent to the west side of W-3. The water flows from a culvert located at the southwest corner of the property, which crosses beneath U.S. Highway 191. The water for this trench appears to ' be supplied from a spring across the highway to the south (FWP Streams and Ditches of the City of Bozeman, 1992). 4.4 SEDGE MARSH AND ASSOCIATED DITCH (W-4) ' This small wetland is located adjacent to U.S. 191. Water from the south side of the highway is directed on to the property via a 24" CMP culvert (Exhibit ' A), where it pools and creates a small hummocky marsh, and then flows north into a small, narrow ditch (Photo 4.4). The marsh and associated ditch represent 8% of the total wetland acreage (0.29 acres). The hummock marsh is ' approximately 0.06 acres or 21% of W-4 within the property boundaries. The wetland is classified as palustrine, persistent emergent, permanently to seasonally flooded (Cowardin et al. 1979). Baxter Creek BusinesRark • Page 15 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 � .'�+�i �': 1 ,.>= ,f� .''''rs ,y.;1 F�.y'>'' �4.... 7;:,' •..r fir`� J.: - f Y r n. i Photograph 4.4. Sedge marsh and associated ditch (W-4j. The photo ' was taken from the culvert, where it (exits from beneath HWY 191. View is to the north. 4.4.1 Vegetation Beaked Sedge, duckweed, pondweed (Potamogeton spp., OBL), short- awned foxtail (Alopecurus aequalis, OBL), speedwell (Veronica spp., OBL) were the primary hydric vegetation indicators within W-4. Upland species dispersed throughout this small wetland included Kentucky bluegrass. 4.4.2 Soils No soil pit was excavated in this area due to inundation with flowing ' water. The soil has been mapped as the hydric Lamoose series discussed in Section 4.2.2. ' 4.4.3 Hydrology The source of hydrology is a seep from the south side of U.S. 191. At the ' source, the water flows in two directions; north under the highway into the Baxter Creek Business Park property and west along the south side of U.S. (FWP Streams and Ditches of the City of Bozeman, 1992). Baxter Creek Business Park Page 16 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 4.5 FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT RESULTS As previously mentioned in Section 3.0, functions of wetlands exist in the ' absence of man and are normally part of a self-sustaining ecosystem. They are the observable and measurable, inherent characteristics of aquatic ecosystems that maintain or have an influence upon the system itself. Some of the functions wetlands provide include groundwater recharge and discharge; sediment trapping; nutrient retention and removal; food chain ' support; wildlife and fish habitat; and heritage values including recreation. The Montana Wetland Field Evaluation Form (MWFEF) was used to evaluate the most extensive wetland types located within the Baxter Creek Business Park, the ' Riverine and Wet Meadow Complex (W-1 and W-2, respectively). The evaluation procedure provides a categorical wetland rating for the wetlands ' based on the criteria listed above and also takes into consideration the size of the wetlands. ' The wetlands are categorized from I to IV based on overall. functions. Category I wetlands are rated the highest in values and provide habitat for threatened or endangered species. Category IV wetlands score the lowest for ' overall values. No Category I wetlands occur within the Baxter Creek Business Park ' project site. A complete list of all functions and values assessed can be found on page F4 of the assesment data sheets included as Appendix B. ' 4.6.1. Wetland Categories The results of the assessment determined the riverine wetland (W-1) to ' be a Category III wetland. This designation is primarily due to the low number of persistent vegetation classes (2) and the small amount of acreage (0.29). In addition, there is a low usage by wildlife due to the lack of natural stream meanders, ponding, and oxbows. The wet meadow complex (W-2) was also determined to be a Category III wetland. The lack of open water and poor vegetation diversity (2) were in part responsible for this value. Wetland values could be greatly improved by returning Baxter Creek to its natural stream-bed location and increasing vegetation diversity to include shrubs and trees in both wetlands. Recreational opportunities would also be enhanced via the °Mainstreet to Mountains" trail proposed along the creek. The proximity of this project to the Valley West Subdivision and its Environmental Education ' Center will provide further opportunity for riparian restoration activities. Baxter Creek Business Park Page 17 ' Wetlands West, Inc. Mav 1998 ' 5.0 SUMMARY Vegetation, soil, and hydrology data gathered at six soil pits (SP-4 is ' outside of the property boundaries) indicated the presence of three wetland communities. The total wetland area comprises 3.57 acres or 19% of the total project acreage. Exhibit A defines the locations of the wetlands and they are summarized below: ' 1. Riverine Wetland (W-1) : The riverine wetland includes the Billion sub-drain outlet ditch and Baxter Creek. Baxter Creek enters the property at the southeast boundary and exits at the center of the northern boundary. The Billion ' sub-drain ditch enters the property toward the north-eastern boundary and joins Baxter Creek where the creek exits the property. The riverine wetland, including channels and associated emergent wetlands, comprises 0.29 acres or 8% of the ' project wetlands. This wetland type, represented by the creek and ditch channel, is classified as a riverine system, upper perennial (cobble bottom and 'high' velocity), unconsolidated bottom (cobble-gravel) and aquatic bed, and permanently flooded (Cowardin et al. 1979). Dominant plant species include wild-celery (Vallisneria americana, OBL) and duck weed (Lemna spp., OBL). The marsh areas associated with and adjacent to Baxter Creek are classified as palustrine, persistent emergent, and are permanently to seasonally flooded, or saturated (Cowardin et al. 1979). Dominant hydric plant species include ' Nebraska and beaked sedge (Carex nebraskensis and C. rostrata, OBL), cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL), and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW). 2. Nebraska and Beaked Sedge Wet Meadow Complex (W-2): The marsh complex represents 83% of the wetlands on the property (2.97 acres). The wetland extends from the west side of Baxter Creek up-gradient and west toward the edge of the plowed field, where the gradient levels. The dominant vegetation is Nebraska and beaked sedge, timothy (Phleum pratense, FACU), thistle (Circium undulatum, FACU+), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis, FACU+). The hydrology is supported by Baxter Creek, and surface and ground water from the plowed area. This wetland is classified as palustrine, emergent wetland, persistent, and saturated to seasonally flooded (Cowardin 1979). ' 3. Nebraska Sedge Meadow W-3 : This wet meadow is considerably 9 ( ) n Y ' drier than W-2 and is located in the northwest corner of the property. It is the smallest wetland on the project, representing 2% of the total wetland acreage (0.06 acre). The dominant vegetation is Nebraska sedge, and Kentucky ' bluegrass. The source of hydrology is likely a seepage from a small trench on the west side of the property boundary and immediately adjacent to the west side of W-3. The hydrology is from water that flows from a culvert located at the southeast corner of the property, which crosses beneath U.S. Highway 191. The r • • Baxter Creek Business Park Page 18 ' Wetlands West, Inc. May 1998 water for this trench appears to be supplied from a spring across the highway to rthe south. This wetland is classified as palustrine, emergent wetland, persistent, and temporarily flooded (Cowardin 1979). r4. Sedge Marsh and Associated Ditch (W-4) : This small wetland is located adjacent to U.S. 191 and represents 8% of the total wetland acreage r (0.29 acres). Water pools immediatley after exiting the culvert, then flows north through a narrow, shallow trench along the western property boundary. The hydrology arrises from a seep on the south side of U.S. 191. The vegetation r was represented by several wetland species, including beaked sedge (Carex rostrata, OBL), duckweed (Lemna spp., OBL), pondweed (Potamogeton spp., OBL), speedwell (Veronica spp., OBL), and short-awn foxtail (Alopecurus r aequalis, OBL). The wetland is classified as palustrine, persistent emergent, permanently to seasonally flooded (Cowardin et al. 1979). r r EXHIBIT A I PROJECT AREA MAP ' WITH WETLAND BOUNDARIES 1 1 1 1 N _A>`93 - — �h— — — — — — it— — — — — — �•' '= ---� FARM !vC ROAD' a — +•T �+� — — — — — /�\ � — — N W58'09t. 622.08' it '�a3 . /f `, ��J. a� N psf� it 11 !r /� � ?le'(,,. ...`v ^,.•.,. J) CO R ; _ :kx 'x_ ;t•:',tea _ ..::c 'l'1 �E ( ,=1 !- r.�ra :+�=. 'D" -yle wt -«i � `• I s I \ i' ...``• is a;.3w _ ._` 'a >;•, ' n'.. 0 m : � 4 ;... O ill 5 �. k ti d• , lt' Z v T TZ rn GO W Vl 2 0 D o1i ,' r s I b •:, ll , •i W t O O O= N I ` O 3-0 7• m _•%` ,;3: '4 ram' ,#s 'a'a� �$,. t C....i ._,.,J r D O mm �i Z rn rn to 70 7 "� ti, M 1\ If \1 z rn m `;psi.•'..y "-.�tfi`••.. `,� ~o~ Z O LA M ' n / rr I o >o t t({ m `~'•-. ; •� 7r ' lit' - I it `I •S' C s— V1 _ 0 NVx 487 \. 111 I j 1 j I'tt ® n `:` .a+.ryvc — _- - ...4..- - •:�i_'_•__ .Y•t.::�,y...r4. `fxee.si,•c^c^>ti-2 _ 4 ,Y Rlw- r� •'•'f•i'L .. N 7� -IV A 4;. �H -I A166� � 2 •'r`O X �SB AAA 51 QDr Lp�� � trJ o a P . v aw F, w BAXTER CREEK 7RA- ENGINEERS COPYRIGHT 1998 A BUSINESS PARK PUD MORRISONSCIENTISTS MORRISON NAIERLE,INC.HEREBY RESERVES to O O OUR COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT IN THIS ~ 3 m SURVEYOP.S DOCUCENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS Z p 0 WETLANDS DELINEATION PLANNERS INCORPORATED HEREIN AS AN INSTRUMENT O p� ❑❑ � MAIERLE,INC. SINCE 19-5 OF PROFE590NAL SERVICE WHICH SHALL m O O OG O.A.REVIEW An LSnployee—Owned Com NOT BE USED IN YMOLE OR IN PART FOR M �'T''y ANY PROJECT OR OTHER USE WITHOUT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY P.O Box 1113 901 TechnabTr B.W. Bozeman,MT 59774.Phom:(406)587-0721 far(408)587-11:6 OUR EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. p� DATE: . <, i, y; i .� � . ` � • �f . � _ - / i i APPENDIX A ' DATA SHEETS ' DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1 S87 CCE V ezlands Delineation I'Aanuai) � V_ I►C 6s la_. Date: i t/ 9 Project/Site: �.k-�cr> G P,e Q � a Applicant/Owner: _(-xr-dt%,eN C—eo-i„e+t County: 6 ,t4jr, ' Investigator: 61e, State: rrr1 Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Commu-; y Is the site significantly disturbed {Atypical Situakn)? Yes 'o Transec; :J: Is the area a potential Problem Area? I Yes No Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) 6a.,t-44s Cr -►-OL ►;- h"�"`"'� (0- S P)= d k s VEGETATION ' Domi��nvvant Plant Species Stratum Indicator u..-n;nant Plant Soeeies S:rarurn Indicator 3. 52d {k O8t— 1]. <. V 0 l j~o t as rn LCA. a.,y,.c o,no- U$L ]2 7. Percent of Cominent Species that are 03L. FACW or FAC nernarics: v,) _ I l�n c"S bank IJ2Cf 4oct rn Cdn C6 fir'h ( 8111 ti►% 6',d ►o-D u^' C ree k lA'L"p tom.. ve e4m M, waS w+Q-40— C IAA- , 0� C rem k, i+ Wu ' HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: X Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Aerial Photographs ;04 Inundated _Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks _Drift Lines ' Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetands Secondary Indicators (2 or more rtquired): Depth of Sur'ace Water: x — 12 (in.) _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: pnri / fin.) _Local Soil Survey Data C _FAC•Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: f�w�aa � (in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks) ' Remarks: W—1 1 25 is "O 1 �-t_ ►S 60.1c-kh c- c e k �S;'�'a m L)j ^hc re. t s a Le �v. 0'-, , At E W— 2b os,4ed • wokAr_r rc or. a r rp k. vr. 6aQa.• air\¢c(�el l e a-�d P �:s. II 5(0 g _ wlc.c g,lliol cl+e�, �S ' xrkn er ,i,At c.4r4 SOILS ,,t 10S - rrrea&Aj C-• Oa—WH� v/ 6trEs►�s> LOa MapUnit gae (Series m cs enr�ase): S3�d Drainage Cass: O/ k� ve.n St)dS — FlnaUat,�^ G O rp1 Feld Observations NA- Taxonomy ISubgroup): 5311 — la ,,,pll- Confirm Mapped Tyce7 Yes No Profile Descriotion: Depth Matrix Color Mortle Colors Mottle Textuse• Concretions, ' finches) Her;-on (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moistl -bundance/Corn:rast Struetu:e. etc. Hydric Soil Indicators: H:s:csol _Conc:etions Histie Epipedon _-;;h Organic Convent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ' =Sulfidie Odor =Or;anie Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquie Moisture Regime L:s:ed on Local Hydric Soils List _ Reducing Conditions _::s:ed on National Hydric Soils Last _G:eyed or Low-Chrema Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks) ' Remarks: +4Z 1 �0.'ti w— , n0 Sp ,1 P,•F- ' WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophy;ie Vegetation Present? Ye No (Circle) (Circle) Wedand Hydrology Present? cYe No Hydric Soils Present? Wes 1,: No 1s this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes Nc ' Remarks: gtf 1 tGY) }411A.AJ •)C) --j, CU-1ee[CJCA htshrt,cal(�. Rofpn ovects � �,,�11 -��"l,:�c� We_ �kxt,cv-- o�-,d r"o.t„ka,-, wa-k�, f►wJ - ' Approved by M U AC / 2 P°�-alp ' DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) 1 Project/Site: �cZnc�( G� �✓I Date: eq 16 ' Applicant/Owner: PC- -pe 0 County: � Investigator: We 4-1 n o- 4 r r, State: PIPIT- Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? N Community ID: S-rwf t, 13 ' Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes o Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: w�oLo.-TI (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 10. ' 3. "CIA" aAu-J%',acnv- � FAC11� 11. 4. S_a { FAC L', 12. 5._ C `J _E&e-0- 13. 6. ' 14. 7. 15. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC Sp�O ' (excluding FAC-). Remarks: 4J10­0. 1 HYDROLOGY `Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream. Lake. or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _✓Aerial Photographs =Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks Drift Lines —Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more requirea): Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ' —Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: A (in.) Local Soil Survey Data _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: _er(in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks) '. Remarks: CUie,(Q.,ea op hje(✓el uJ y del oNn Stco�� i-W-Wrc th-.S• A0 per.-.•o,w,�, .d.�i o�h1►S a�o�ont-�+. -f►-e.e �s •: la�ct� teA, b+vJ (�"4tA at. &nnt4 •+khs Wut.o- �NE ccr.-M^ G ' SOILS ' Map Unit Name // /fjlUSsnJ F+ ) (Series and Phase): 5 I og "C"daw CU7( N 4 d Drainage Class: Feld Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): P10 jj.2 ✓+hcLct Ia 60'-011 Confirm Mapped Type? nY.SNo ' Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Motde Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 3 4-'Q- 12- 13 ;�� jZ 7, sr7 1 Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content•in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ' Aquic Moisture Regime Misted on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions s)`� Listed on National Hydric Soils List _Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks) ' Remarks: //ir Q( S P' n+�I`-�'^— M`��Ws S _10 �o C� /6 -.1,pf n p1C0.Q �/`. IJ�OS Loa R►"„'l C', G1 1-.G(s'te- "Y1 wfwfrQN- Ica-~ ' WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yea t 1(Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Presentl Yes �� Hydric Soils Presentl es Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes /No/ Remarks: l� 'h4� oriiQ- PG.CL*S Md CQn �1Cu45 _ 2b►'aS�-c. ' GtiQc, i s IA a-.d t Pbu.�q I l a.. 1t-ctn�� tt� 8 a tka-. GIJ��cL. ' Approved by H U A / 2 ' DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: G ac4 tn Cha2J,— 61Ayyiess Par-?L- Date: ' Applicant/Owner: ban dA;&r., 6•%.ez*, minty: Go�J low Investigator: c l nn 19mcem State: wcr Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: CPxAA ' Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes N Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes CN Plot ID: W - 2- (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator C2. aan.x rc5�fl— �+ o � 10. 3. 4. //o`. P e CTtC u+ 12. F,4c ' 13. ' 6. 14. 7. is. ' S. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). Remarks: arc $�2e � u.lo Lw-�Li �-h�gy`G W —2. °rd sO99 y ,•, ox btt,.�� � ' HYDROLOGY X Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Aerial Photographs A' Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks _Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands T.I.dd lae( Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of SurfackWater: 6LA4ekS Gn.) X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ' _Water-Stained Leaves .�Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks K V,d jNn�,S b ec�} �trL,�oyc)4ot�1 Z {otJu�> 6w_tr, Cry' f-`'b• `5 .,4 6j r so yo tJQ9. ax �s Q is t kg_ ate+t ast p S . J 1 1 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): 537 6- L.--VCW- (1+) Drainage Class: boo✓1.�� v� P Feld Observations %�l Taxonomy (Subgroup): )Q t,.01 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No KJO + ' Profile Descriotion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mole Texture, Concretions, inchesl Horizon (Munsell Moist) IMunsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc. 2 II- !b I0 -7 5 4 45% Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content-in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _Aquic Moisture Regime )e Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma'Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: .50,1 �, c1oT� k—; ^^a*t�S '`r1p•� Mw✓� tJ0.(t sC,,,ved -f ' 5 ,1 V.Sr. . 1ati 6)0S5�s'� S � Cn hF c r0.VJ t� Ci6whY't +o d_6n&_� IZ 1: +&P .(, SIO$ r• WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yee No (Circle) (Circle) ' Wetland Hydrology Present? es No Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No Remarks: Qe.O— VQl�np �vew Ve.r.{ w�E -}q CIl�uPJti CA k�C. i i o.•.e� , sh t 1 ' p.•ec Ip,n%.,LL ' . e►v a I,c. P Yc.6m 6L_k uu.cl +o 1465 p►-�s cl� �i ' Approved by H U A ! 2 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: (_;CLkCb•er C> -Q,, Date: ylry 9� Applicant/Owner: 7 C. -De v County: 60- !Lkh:, Investigator. c ,- State: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Fte_td Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes N�o Transect ID: ' Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes (&D Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) Sp-3 VEGETATION ' Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. h�if i r.,rn dt.Cchvu 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. S. 13. 6. 14. 7. is. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC ' (excluding FAC-). Remarks: I,"-- - I e� {��t^lt GI. 199 7 a,,4 1 ' HYDROLOG' _Recorde Wetland Hydrology Indicators: _ ^ Primary Indicators: Inundated ✓ � J Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _No Re_ _Water Marks Drift Lines ' =Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: l:�r fin.) _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) "'Local Soil Survey Data _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: _�(in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: tiCkv— ,t P �"t SOILS Map Unit Name �H ) (Series and Phase): 1-ae+"00Sf_ 4�+) ✓41 &-s-4 Scu Drainage Class: St7vet�l-o 'Atnrr 1 �' Field Observations ' Taxonomy (Subgroup): i I Confirm Mapped Type? Yes o Profile Descriotion: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inchesl Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. v s•-y 8 - IZ Io µ Cyr IIaJ) c Ia,.,ry 1 1 Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _Aquic Moisture Regime _Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List _G/lleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: S - 1 Z 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yea No (Circle) (Circle) ' Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yea SO Remarks: C PJ"�'� ,'1'= � S1J q�0 STD t ►ti S Q 412t C� v►A3tr Si ..�Iob�*r�' W L. I^ �!��l: l,✓ JQ- ,< �tic'r �a (i eu�,t, '��l�M(,td S v,r 4er- 1e61P ' Approved by HOUSACE 3192. 1 � 2_/q ' ` DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 111987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Y Project/Site: Date: N Applicant/Owner: County: (_-irx:t!u►1.-- 1 Investigator: V'J* •-i G1---,CIy yJ PS V1^ ram- State: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sitd? YG No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: U ' Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ( Plot ID: _!� (If needed, explain on reverse.) S _ W -4 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. FAc- 9. 2. 10. 61L 11. ,. T 3.�a re.6-ask••;t— ;r. 4. G✓c N.u•.. ne -f LA� � 12. FA u 13. 6. _B✓Z>yVV_tS I✓ _n r—t L4 14. 7. 1 an&:J�Q r urlr� t,�p r is. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-).' _/ 7 �O Remarks: ct"20' �s Qo�♦ttet `� CanQx GL.c� �[� Cq�nf+y. W�(11 ��^� �^6oLA'.4v� HYDROLOGY Rcorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ' =Aerial Photographs =Inundated Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks _Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Feld Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches _Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Local Soil Survey Data _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _Other (Explain in Remarks) ' Remarks: 011 n f vim,_ ►� ^C{a acl A C0—+ +0 W—y Jq_,Z e- iS a� �t�1- haae bean �u�h�-tj) "4� u � N 0 U o o tl7 � o Z � Q. Z -0 a u N G 7 �N o } C ° c u V Q c J ° o 5 C x2 cn 0 on a 0 E 0 NI c (Au .� c C 6 1 Qa 0 o J c .0o r K c c E '� c 0 lLL V 1 C p=q 0_ l4. O V co .5 C C C EX O E C C J Z OL CL O c :) CID 'J .a aN c c N 0 0 ^rJ � Q � O •cvv v w _ ` O p p N N •C �' 1u-� ul ° ° O N r 20 Z O w J - _ cm ° 2 '� E E x _ o N ti M O o l/ V1 n v `-" Z 0 n y ow� � ° Q� 'G o •aa c � o c o ° M u ° Ir. ca > c , uvi p O N q •F 4. •j > 11J O to O V O A O N •N 7 v o O p 0 N E r 7 O O t _ = M Q,o (J ` lJ > CL co E " _ o O p O in C L O , O ( Z p C V .fit ••�^^'YYY O.•: O zr-I= L 1 •C O �1 O O .0 O O 2 w 1.-• o. o •- = ac 2 3 I aC N ' DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION ' (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: &X-k;->C AP k- BIAS"r !Q_r petn l`- Date: s_1zs/Iq 3 Applicant/Owner: (S County: 6 0_)Jat✓tm_ Investigator: +-to State: v►'q-r Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? o Community ID: C ' Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yeses CN Transect ID: w—f Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes (N-o) Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) s VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Co.,.2x rjm-� oAyn, _ Vat— 9. 2. Ve Cc,_ s,n �4 U EL 10. 3. Lt n,*_ Set? U O&C 11. 4. PCB} aG4"r. IJL n f�t 12. ' S. o;rru��S a� 4 .u.ntt�C 9 13. 8. 14. 7. 15. 8. 18. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC $0 (excluding FAC-). Remarks: HYDROLOGY --`iecorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ,--Aerial Photographs --Inundated _Other —Saturated in Upper 12 Inches -_No Recorded Data Available —Water Marks _Drift Lines —Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators 12 or more required): -_ Depth of Surface Water: �_,g ' Gn.) _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches _Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: D XJ A fin.) _Local Soil Survey Data _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: DN A On.) _Other(Explain in Remarks) Remarks: 0u%.Q o. PlooqUd, f' e \�C fry�cvgL C C�,A ve�t- Le^P0.t k LA,-S . I�{ I �' SUV y 'S A Seg p Gov,•. S ,s,r4J O'F 1-flk tl -4-rvwS ' tre-Y ►' od" toe 5kcr+— ref• boy.- #A� t3-1() ' SOILS Map Unit Name (� CIA)�� (Series and Phase): 5 37 A-[A^�or5c—f N��/ "� �S—t� Drainage Class: 90MtD v, poor Feld Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): vit <a ,011 Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No ' Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol _Concretions _Histic Epipedon _High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils _Sulfidic Odor _Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _Aquic Moisture Regime _✓listed on Local Hydric Soils List - _Reducing Conditions _Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or low-Chroma Colors _Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: /Jc) Sp e ca�a � f a.�v. (-tit-,cla-ec( v.1j -Fjo.&�7 t o WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No (Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Hydric Soils Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland) Yes No Remarks: V-=- " Q^C ;%%A "C)C�t� ►PCl1� �1 W y I q ( •�u.Q f� �t S}OC� t . Approved y`_ ._ -1 B-19 ' DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 0 987 CCE `A'etlands Celinestion. Manual) Project/Site: c4'r7 Crceh- pCr+l•_. Date: Y2-7/9Q Applicant/Owner: 6aA.c{t%er 6e,(ia.n_ e 4r County: 1 Investigator: -1) _.u.�.II . L-LQ r fw•. A le4-I&1, —, State: m-t— Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No ComrrlVn:, y ID: CAPL Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect :D: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: sP--lo (If needed, ,explain on reverse.) (dam rt Z ,„ _2— VEGETATION Dominant Plant Soeeies Stratum Indicator uo'-�;ntnt Plant Soeeies S-?arum Indicator �� 2. C ✓i kA�eca.-�o. 3. 5. C¢_^fa�?va. ►Y,xe ta.,le���' Ltx+ ) �3. r., 6. tr, rOSiti[1�f s, 4Jt- OQI. 7. Fercent of .Dominant Species that are 03L. FACW or FAC -(excluding FA---). '> 5p P-"`v lti PL Sc f-p (FAQ,U -L—4 PL\ Remarks: SQ!ue.eV4 shoos l'V,rwt�I^c�wk UJ—L CU--rLke bud lAPL- Neap nA+-1 cI1_ Sp�IS C — :' +-,'Ks ,,r- L,� C zo,k AS� I ' HYDROLOGY Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): 'Ketland Hydrology Indicators: Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ' ✓Aerial Photographs Inundated _Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches No Recorded Data Available Water Marks Drift Lines ' Sediment Deposits Field Observations: —Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surace Water: (in.) _Oxidized Root Channeis in Upper 12 Inches Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: �� _fin.) ✓Lots( Soil Survey Data _FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _Other (Explain in Remams) ' Remarki- ® tij WL d,4oc �'� TWS S Ot L �+ U1• -Z o .0 rt�s y ,j� 1 P i SOILS ' Map Unit game -r potTz).y +p J• u� (Series and Ph .o5e[tse): 53-7 A - L.(, I+) w� Bb^2 g0.5t'+ ^rh+c ta.+s Dra nege Class: •J Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): T �C 1 Confirm Mapped Tvae7 Ye No Prof-tie Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture. Concretions, finchesl Horizon IMunsell Moist) (Nlunsell Moistl Abundance/Conuast Structu.-e. etc, Hydric Soil Indicators: H:s;csol _''cncretions _Histic Epipedon _..;;h Organic Content in Surface Laye.' in Sandy Soils _Sul`.idic Odor' 0r;enic Streaking in Sandy Soils_Aquic Moisture Regim _e ;Lis:ed on Local Hydric Soils List _Reducing Conditions _L�s:ed on National Hydric Soils List _Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors _C;her (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: W—Z pitCtl G mo-�t�d $p', (, ►%t a.A.0 CAS-UlerV- I_ Ve p-VL,( . t ue�, o, e re WL CS :tsf ' ��.� t�-�r-Fu.•� pits o�H�c rn�^cl uJ_'Z WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophy:ic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 140 ' Hydric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes S. Remarks: SVV-OJJ I S{q,t�, e( t f1_ Approved Dy M U AC 3/ 2 1 APPENDIX B ' FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS 1 1 1 i 1 Montana Wetland Field Evaluation For iced 711196) 1.Elojcct Name: U.,LkEr 1rSr S� � •�.� �.`. 3.Evaluation Date: 4.Evaluator(s): LF6-�Lr ova !-r_' ,e4 L V_&Z 5.Wcdand/Sitc N(s): 6.Wedand Location(s): 6 a_UcLt7t.— C O• , !Cr- .'I, c 6 Yy. T'2 S. , 14 §E • N an,.d o•cl(o C.o^E 4v t+uJy I q 1, 7.Evquation is to assess hmctions and values of. 8.Estimated total wedand size(acres): i Wed ands that may be affected by an MDT project G, Z —_Mitigation wedands:pre-construction Mitigation Wetlands:post-construction 9.Estimated acreage of assessment area(AA): Other: (see detailed instructions on how to determine AA) O • Za 10.Classification of AA(HGM according to Brinson;system,subsystemclass,water regime,and special modifier according to Cowardin(19791) HGM Class System Subsystem Class Water Regime Modifier %:of (Brinson) (Cowardin) (Cowardin) (Cowardin) (Cowardin) (Cowardin) AA o Nncr..:I Fic �t -4Lti Tx"5' fi r. a -4- to e vela . seas e e t w, can a 0— t o o .a 0. 11.Circle estimated relative abundance(see defnitiotu o classified sites within the same Major Montana Watershed Basin: Rue Common Abundant 12.Circle general condition of AA(see definitions): Undisturbed Encroached Upon Directly Disturbed .i 13.Habitat Diversity A).N of persistent vegetated B).Open water(see definition) Score Rating Funcsiooal classes fcirele oointsl in the AA is i cl Poinu 33- S poinu present 2 points V103 points absent - 1 point Excry NA 1 point 3-6 High NA Comments: 2-3 Mod NA'' I Low NA Score is(A)x(B)- 14.Brief descriptive summary of AA and surrounding land use and habitat: C✓c-P 1 a n c( �-t vie S+ /L 0 C) ' ; T .C. �I t LA c.r CGV� cL,a cz1'5gr�0 �0 2 Q S'�� S6�s` 11-9l rl(d r0.J+it 'et—c! LA—le -xdl.Yt w� .` 0j� [MvYErtA0. o/W 4, J IS.Functions and Values Assessment IS.a)Habitat for Federally Listed,Proposed,or Candidate Threatened or End angcrcd Plants or Animals AA is documented or suspeaed(tittle D or S)to receive: Ifigbest Raring Fumvooal D S Regular use or is designated critical habitat(list species): Level Use: Points D S Occasional(4dmclucnt,sporadic)use(list species): dodrttl IGgh I D S' Incidental(chance,inconsequential)use(list species): do : No use c/o« v sus/reg Mod Mod .1 Source(s)for documented use(e.g.,obsmadon,records,etc.): sus/= Mod .7 Commenu: docru,ed t.ow .S sus4oad Low i ease tine 13.b)Habitat for Plants or Animals Rand 51,52,or 53 by the Montana Namral Heritage Program IGgbest Rating Fuactitsna) (Not including species listed in IS.a)above.) Level Use: points AA is documented or suspected(circle D or S)to receive: D S Regular use gist species): dodreg FGgh I D S Occasional(infiequent,sporadic)use(list species): dodocc High .1 D-k Incidental(chance,inconsequential)use(list species): /ll�S1 No use sus.7eg Mod .7 susto" Mod .6 Sources)for documented use(e.g..observation,records,etc.): Comments: doew6d Law 1 ru&Awad Low .1 nose Nooe 0 15.e)General Wildlife Habitat MW AA is known or suspected(circle K or S)to receive(fill in blank)substantial(s),moderate(m). or little to no g)use(see definitions for these terms)by the listed wildlife groups Scare Rstiag Functional (see definitions for aquatic/scmi•aquatie and non-aquatic wildlife) Points K Aquatic/semi-aquatic birds gist examples): Eck-5 Q"h,s - e 21 Iligh 1 K L Non-aquatic birds(list examples): rt?C�-r'PS �! tii l fP P K S LAquatic/scmi-aquatic mammals(list examples): It Nigh .9 K� 4t Non-aquatic mammals gist examples): c)«r 7 }{;gb g K S — Aquatielsemi-aquatic reptiles gist examples): K S `Non-aquatic reptiles gist examples): 9 I{rgh .7 K S _-,Amphibians gist examples): K G M_Invertebrates gist examples): 6 Mod 3 1 i-Assessed wildlife use(circle points): ii,Habitat diversity from 013 fcirele points) 3 Mod .4 23 s's or 25 m's+s's 7 po High to exceptional rating- 3 1-2 s's or 2-4 m's poin Moderate rating points 2 LOW 3 No s's and<2 m's point Low rating tnt 1 Law .1 Comments: � L � Score is(i)x(ii) 15A)General Fish Habitat(If AA does not contain or is not swficially connected to a fish-bearing stream or standing water body[e.g..pond or lake],circle NA here and proceed to next function) Scars I P..6.8 Functiocal i.AA is known or suspected(circle K or S)to Pomu support listed groups for portion of thew ii.Surface water in IS High I 141C cycle(circle points) - AA is(circle points): . K S Native fish 5,�points Perrnanendperennial 3 poin 9 tG to Ngh .9 K S Introduced game fish . Seasonallntermittent- mts gh tt IE3 K S Introduced non-game fish 2 points Temporary/ephemeral 1 point 6 Mod .7 K S No fish I point 3 Mod ..6 ' L C.a. }pre k 0.)+� r 1 Fy.CI 3.4 Mod 3 Comrmnts: J, S r✓ C I^GVn 1 I Low tilt e 2 eNn od O O 1 Low I ' Score is n x(u)-_r'�_ 1 15.e)Flood Attenuation and Storage(Applies only to wetlands subject to flooding via in-channel or overbank flow. See" p4ting Fuoctiooal If wetlands in the AA are not flooded from in-channel or overbank flow,circle NA here and proceed to next function. Pests See 15.1)Dynamic Surface Water Storage for wetlands thu flood,but not from in-channel or overbank flow.) 22 nigh 1 i.Estimated acreage of jurisdictional ii.Estimated•/.of flooded wetland area wcdand in the AA that is subject classified as forested(fo),scrub-shrub(ss), 16.21 high .9 to periodic flooding(circle points): or both(circle poinu) Flooded wetlands 2 10 titres - 7 points >75%fo/ss - 3 points 14.13 nigh .9 10 acres>Flooded wetlands>2 acres- 5 Ptual 25-75%fo/ss - 2 poin Flooded wetlands 12 acres- 1 point <25%fo/ss - point I I High .7 ' g.10 Mod 6 iii. AA wntairs no outlet or restricted outlet - I m AA contains unrestricted outlet - 0 points 6.7 Mod .3 iv.Are residences,businesses,or other features which may be damaged by floods located within 0.5 miles 3.4 Mod .4 downstream of AA?--I- If so,list here: - a y 3 Low .J Comments: 2 Law 2 n 1 O Score is((i)x(ii)]+(iii) 15.0 Sediment/Nutrient/Toxicant Retention and Removal Circle truc M of false(E)for each of the followine i. T AA receives direct discharge of managed water(municipal or road stormwater drainage,agricultural drainsee. industrial/municipal wastewater)or accumulation of sediment/excess nutrients evident(deposits on vegetation, algal mats or other sign of eutrophication present)or immediate upstream land use has potential to deli%er ' significant sedimcnt/nutricnt loads to AA.ii. OT Evidence of flooding or ponding occurs in AA. iii. T/F AA contains restricted outlet or no outlet such that Dow is slowed or detained. Score Rating Fur"ional iv, T Percent cover or emergent and/or dense woody vegetation in the AA exceeds 50%. Pointe (i)is trite and at least two of(ii),(iii),or(iv)are true - t�g NA IlighRating is neither High or Low - (i)is false and at least two of(ii),(iii),or(iv)are false - Low rating \A Mod .5 Comments: NA Low 1 .I ru",\ 15.g)Sediment/Shorclin:Stabilization(applies only if M occurs on or within the banks of a river,sutarn,or other Score. Pa mg FmcbmA natural or manmade drainage,or on the shoreline of a standing water body which has a maximum depth exceeding Poiw ' 6.6 fat at low water(e.g..subject to wave action). If does not apply,c'unle NA here and proceed to text function. I w i.Estimated%cover of rooted vcgctaud ii.Water body adjacent to rooted 9 High .9 F component in AA(circle polnis) Yeectation is(circle points): 10 16th t >30%rooted vegetation- points Permumt/pereMial - %3 po 6 Mod .7 ' 10-30%rooted vegetation- mts Seasonal/intermittent- �J)tote r +1od J <10%rooted vegetation- 1 point Temporary/ephemeral- 2 points ] Mad r Comments: l LAW 1 3 S 2 [Aar. .I Score is(i)x(ii)- 15.h)Production Export/Food Chain Support sm" Bering Fuocaooal i.Acreage of vegetaud component ii.Habitat diversity ruing Poeo l<L AA(circle points) (from N 13:circle points) >5 acres- 10 points High-Exceptional-3 PO* ]9 FGss I 1-5 acres- 5 rots Moderate- 2 poin 21•36 High 9 <1 acre- Po Low- `f)Sdtrit 16.19 Hash _ ' - ID• Mid 7 . Outlet presence(cirtle pointy)� jy,Surface water in M is(circle points): a•9 Mod 6 i M contains an outicf 3� Permanent/percnuial - 3 poi 7 MW J M contains no outlet'--1 point Seasonal/Intermittent points Temporary/ephemeral or absent - 1 point 5.6 to. r ' Comments: s LOW J 11 ] LOW J Score is 10)x Gi)1+Riii)x Gv)1 - 2 LOW .1 15.i)Groundwater Discharge/Recharge Sege Raders I'Mecnal i.Check the discharge indicators listed below that apply to the AA Poinu _Springs are known or observed in the M.• _Seeps are present at the wetland edge. Vegetation is growing during dormant iM perfrum.Uy flooded during drought periods. NA Flits I season or drought. _Wetland occurs at the toe of a natural slope. _Wetland contains an outlet,but no inlet. NA LOWOther 1 NA lhilm NA \ k )i.Check the recharge indicators listcd below that apply to the AA M is known discharge or recharge area or one _Pcrtncable substrate present without underlying impeding layer. or more indicators of discharge or recbugc present- fU gh rating —Other contains inlet,but no outlet No discharge or recharge indicators present- Low rating Other. Available cdormation pertaining to AA is Comments: IA Yl It. inadequate to judge dischugdrecharge potential- Urdm%-o I5.J)Uniqueness Scors Raaaa F®cdooal ).Estimated relative abundance of Pomp similarly clauified sites within the ii.Replacement potentiaUbabitat Maior Watershed Basin (NIL•circle ooints): diversity 012:circle points) 33 Foss I d Ran - 3 points M is/contains bog,fen,warm springs or 31.32 F6th .9 Common - 2 mature(>80 years)forested wetland - 10 points Abundant - l poutt' AA does not contain above but habitat 2.213 FGgh s ` diversity is high-exceptional - 3 points 12.21 high .7 I M does not contain above and habitat r diversity is low-moderate Mod .6e - _' I point iii.Condition of AA(from N12_circle points): 1,9 Mod J ' Undisturbed = 3 Encroached Upon poin 5,6,7 Mid .a Directly Disturbed - tnt Law J Comments: 1 1 2 Score is((i)x(ii)]+(iii) 151)Recreation/Education Potential i. Is the M a known redid site(circle)? Y ¢t yes,rue as High and go to ii.If no,go to iii.) ' ii. Check the categories listed below that app y to the M: —education/scientific study Sco" a'°°s F ninon,) _consumptive recreation Pomb r _non consumptive recreation 6 tb gb I i _others: iii. Based on the location,diversity,size, other attributes of the site,is there stroog potential for 3 Nod .7 recreational/cduational use(circle)? Y N pfyes,go to ii,then proceed to iv. if no,rate as Low �"YI�..Q.� �:'•�" h'C �111'G1�� b,rl -.AJ&+rL.�ne>, (1L / Mod J jar Condition orAA(from N 12:circle points): v.Ownership of AA(circle points)- Undisturbed - 3 'rats Public 2poi.ats 2 low 3 Encroached Upon 2 points Private 1 paint no?�. Directly Disturbed 1 Comments: Z Score is(iv)x(v)- Z' (I'3) ' 15.1)Dynamic Surface Water Storage(applies to wetlands that do not flood from overbank or in-c�anncl(low,but flood via ppL,upland surface flow,or groundwater flow. If no jurisdictional wetlands in the AA are subject to flooding,circ�e`NA h and procad with the evaluation.) i.Estimated acreage of jurisdictional wetland in the AA ii.Estimated flood Score Rating Fimctioaal ' that is subject to txriodic flooding(circle norms): fteauencv(circle oointsl Poieu Flooded wetlands iSacres - 3 points Wetland floods 2 5110 years-2 points d lugb 1 5 acres>Flooded wetlands> I acre- 2 points Wetland floods<5110 years- 1 point 4 high .a ' Flooded wctiands<I acre - .5 point 2,3 Mod .s 1 Comments: t LOW -3 Score is(i)x(ii)- .3 Low 1 Function dt Value Summary and Overall Rating ti C fi I Function de Value Parameters Rating Actual Possible Functional Units functional Functional (Actual Points x Estimated AA points Points Acreage) A. Listed/Proposed/Candidate T&E Species Habitat ' B. MNHP Species Habitat C. General Wildlife Habitat rv-06 C D. General Fish/Aquatic Habitat ev o e' p, , 1 E. Flood Attenuation and Storage F. Sediment/NutrienVroxicant Removal 1 ' G. Sediment/ShorclineStabilization H. Production Export/Food Chain Support Mac( p ,'� 1 0-2- 1. Groundwater Dtscharge/Rccharge A _ WA — ' J. Uniqueness �.�; !, 1 0.46 K. Recrcation/Education Potential r, Z. I L. Dynamic Surface Water Storage N A - N AdEE -- Totals 4, 1 p Overall AA Rating(Circle appropriate category based on tIr ritcria outlined below): 4 d �p ' 1 lI Qi rV I Category I Wetland-Must satisfy one of the following criteria: o Score of.9 or I functional point for Listed/Proposed/Candidate Threatened or Endangered Species;Qr o Score of.9 or 1 functional points for Uniqueness QI'High"rating for Uniqueness and Condition(q 12)is"Undisturbed";pr o Score of 1 functional point for Flood Attenuation and Storage 1d answer to Question 14.E.3 is"yes";or i o Total actual functional points>80%(round to nearest tenth)of total possible functional points. Category 11 Wetland-Does not satisfy criteria for Category 1 AIA: o Score of 1 functional point for Species Rated S I,S2,or S3 by the Montana Natural.Heritage Program;91 ' o Score of I functional point for General Wildlife Habitat;gl f o "High"ratings for¢Q[Il General Wildlife Habitat m,Q General Fish/Aquatic Habitat;gr 4 o 'High"rating for Uniqueness 9, o Total actual functional points>65%(round to nearest tenth)of total possible functional points. Catego IlI cdand-Does not satisfy criteria for Category 1,Category 11,or Category IV. f Category IV Wetland-Does not satisfy criteria for Category 1,Category H,or Category III and: o "Low"rating for Uniqueness;and o "Law"rating for Production Export/Food Chain Support;and ' o Total actual functional points<3V19(round to nearest tenth)of total possible functional points. (F4) Montana Wetland Field Evaluation For&bred 711196) 1.Project Name: 2.Project N and Control 8: I� r Bnx 3.Evaluation Date: 5 12 :�r 4.Evaluaror(s): t ��.,� S.Wedand/Site k(s): J ` Z 6.Wetland Location(s): L-,;L.tpcx El— C c , ^'>'r f -- sSee �j , SF Y4, R Jr' E cs.•,4 0a ^-a-1 .y. 4 VJY 113• vl�`•.1 ` � .� v 7.Evaluation is to assess functions and values of: 8.Estimated total wcUand size(acres): ✓Wetlands that may be affected by an MDT project _Mitigation wetlands:pre-constnution ^-Mitigation Wetlands:post-construction 9.Estimated acrtage of assessment aria(AA): Other: (see detailed instructions on how to determine AA) Z •R 10.Classification of AA(HGM according to Brinson;system subsystem class,water regime,and special modifier according to Cowardin(19791) HGM Class System Subsystem Class Water Regime Modifier %of ( (Brinson) (Cowardin) (Cowudin) (Cowardin) (Cowardin) (Cowardin) AA -i- 1.1 a - Pen, ACV Zz�I,j V 100 c>J Gle:C:•r 11.Circle estimated relative abundance(see dcfiniti ' I classified sites within the same Major Montana Watershed Basin: Rare Common Abundant 12.Circle general condition of AA(see definitions): Undisturbed Encroached Upon Directly Disturbed 13.Habitat Diversity A).M of persistent vegetated B).Open water(see definition) Score Rating Functional classes(circle mints) in the AA is(circle points): Points I is present.=. 2 paints 2= 3 pointsl ent ! 10 Excry NA s I- I point 3-6 High NA Comments: 2-3 Mod NA � Z 1 Law NA Score is lox(B)_ 14.Brief descriptive summary of AA and surrounding land use and habitat: ra�!ur� -fi V.f-C i Qd j ve-:+ 6.-1--rlcth-k4. �tllt'r, cloc�.lt,1 �.,p �C 4off_*W`f 191, c'J;'—v J IS.Functions and Values Assessment I S.a)Habitat for Federally Listed,Proposed,or Candidate Threatened or Endangered Plants or Animals AA is documented or suspected(circle D or Sl to receNce I6gbest Ratiag Functiooal D S Regular use or is designated critical habitat(list species): Level Use: Poina D S Occasional(infrequent,sporadic)use(list species): dodreg High I D S Incidental(chance,incousequcntial)use(list species): do docc High 9 D S No use nWreg Mod g Source(s)for documented use(e.g.,observatiori,records,etc.): susiocc Mod .7 Comments: docutad law .S rusiaad aoae None 0 I5.b)Habitat for Plants or Animals Rated S 1,S2,or S3 by the Montana Natural Heritage Progfam Iligbea Raring F=monal (Not including species listed in 1 S.a)above.) Level Use: Points AA is documented or suspected(circle D er S)to receive: D S Regular use Qist species): doe Ire g High I D S Occasional(infrequent,sporadic)use(list species): dodo« High .a Dfc,./ Incidental(chance•inconsequential)use(list species): D S No use rusreg Mod .7 Source(s)for documented use(e.g.,observation,records,etc.): shoes Mod .6 Comments: doe'Irocid LOW .2 zus4oad` I.aw .I.; 000e Ncoe 0 Now 15.c)General Wildlife Habitat AA is known or suspected(circle K or S)to receive(fill in blank)substantial(s),moderate(m), or little to no Q)use(see definitions for these terms)by the listed wildlife groups Scare Rating Functional (see definitions for aquatic/semi-aquatic and non-aquatic wildlife) Points K S �i �Aquatidsemi-aquatic birds(list examples): 5— �— 21 H'gb 1 K S; L Non-aquatic buds(list examples): Scr ye K S j_Aquatic/semi-aquatic mammals(list examples): I j N;gh 9 K S =Non-aquatic marrimals(list examples): 490ri 7 Hlgb g K S — Aquaticlsemi-aquatic reptiles(list examples): K S =Non-aquatic reptiles(list examples): 9 High .7 K S _,_Amphibians(list examples): K S _Invertebrates(list examples): 6 Mod .S i i.Assessed wildlife use(circle points): ll-Habitat diversity from 413(circle points) 3 Mod .4 i :3 s's or:5 m's+s's - 7 points High to exceptional rating- . 3 points 1-2 s's or 2.4 m's - 3 p9in Moderate rating- points '- -i ow .3 No s's and<2 m's = 1 point Low rating- I Law .l l Comments: I L Score is(i)x(ii)- I 15A)General Fish Habitat(If AA does not contain or is not surficially connected to a fish-bearing stream or standing water body[e.g.,pond or lake],circle NA here and proceed to next function) Score Rating Func°ocal i.AA is known or suspected(circle K or S)to Points support listed groups for portion of thew ii.Surface water in 15 High 1 I life cycle(circle points) AA is(circle ooints): 10 High .9 K S Native fish - 5 points Pcrmanent/perennial - 3 tits K S Introduced game fish - 3 points Seasonalrntermittcnt- 2 jpoLinu:s�' 9 H'� g K S In d non-game fish 2 ptun Temporary/ephemeral- int 6 Mod 7 K S o PO, 3 Mod 6 ' Comments: 3/ Mod 3 2 Law I I Law .1 1 Score is t)x n a 15.e)Flood Attenuation and Storage(Applies only to wetlands subject to flop ' a tit-channel or overbank flow. Scare Rating Functional If wetlands in the AA arc not flooded from in-channel or overbank flow,circl NA and proceed to next function. Phu See 15.1)Dynamic Surface Water Storage for wetlands that(]pod,but not fro appal or overbank flow.) 22 High I i.Estimated acreage of jurisdictional ii.Estimated%of flooded wetland area wetland in the AA that is'subjcct classified as forestcd(fo),scrub-shrub(ss), 16.21 High .9 ' to periodic floodine(circle points): or both(circle points)- Flooded wetlands: 10 acres - 7 points >75%foss 3 points 14.13 Hith .g 10 acres>Flooded wetlands>2 acres- 5 points 25-75%foss = 2 points ' Flooded wetlands s 2 acres- 1 point <25%fo/ss I point 11 ModFugh .7 iii. AA contains no outlet or restricted outlet c 1 point a.t0 Mod 6 AA contains unrestricted outlet 0 points 6,7 Mod .5 iv.Are residences,businesses,or other features which may be damaged by floods located within 0.5 miles 5.1 Mod .4 ' downstream of AA? If so,list here: 3 Low .3 Comments: 2 Low 2 Score is[(i)x(ii))+(iii) = I Low .I 15.0 Sediment/Nutrient/Toxicant Retention and Removal each ;be following i. T F AA receives direct discharge of managed water(municipal or road stormwater drainage,agricultural drainsee. 1 industrial/municipal wastewater)or accumulation of scdiment/excess nutrients evident(deposits on vegetation, algal mats or other signs of eutrophication present)or immediate upstream land use has potential to deliver significant sediment/nutrient loads to AA. Evidence of flooding or ponding occurs in AA. iii. TI AA contains restricted outlet or no outlet such that Dow is slowed or detained. Scan Rating Functional iv. � I Percent cover or emergent and/or dense woody vegetation in the AA exceeds 50%. Points ' (i)is true and at least two of(ii),(iii),or(iv)are true - High rating INA }bgh I ' Rating is neither High or Low Moderate (i)is false and at least two of(ii),(iii),or(iv)are false m ow rating NA Mod 5 Comments: NA Low 1 j fF�l 15.g)Sediment/Shorelinc Stabilization(applies only if AA occurs on or within the banks of a river,sucam,or other Score ►tea Famom, natural or manmade drainage,or on the shoreline of a standing water body w�'' has a maximum depth exceeding ' 6.6 fat at low water(e.g.,subject to verve action). Ildoes not apply,carclf NN�tjerc and proceed to text(unction. '• `��� Ic wYb I i.Estimated%cover of rooted vcgctaud ii.Water body adjacent to rooted 9 fugh .9 i component in AA(circle points) vegetation is(circle points): 10 Ifiah t >30%rooted vegetation- 3 points Permanendpercnnial - S points 6 Mod .7 t 10-301%rooted vegetation- 2 points SeasonaUntermittent- 3 points a S <10%rooted vegetation- 1 point Temporary/ephemeral= 2 points Mod S Mad ./ Comments: 3 law 2 ' 2 low I Score is(1)z(ii)- t 15.h)Production Export/Food Chain Support Store Ram Functional f i.Acreage o vegetated component ii.Habitat diversity ruing a Porn ' jn AA(circle poi (from 0137 circle pints) i >S acres- '"7� High-Exceptional 21 MgbMO I i I-S acres- S points Moderate- 2 points II-36 tGab 9 i <1 acrc- point Low- pout 16-19 tG .a i 1 1 Mod .7 j' iii. Outlet grcsencc(circle poincsl iv_Surface water in AA is(circle points): L9 Mod .6 AA contains an outlet-3 o�mu Permanent/perennial - 3 is 7 Moa s AA contains no outlet f l point Seasonalrntermincrit - 2 points i Temporary/ephemrnl or absent - mt 5.6 Low 1 ' Comments: 1 LOW 3 ! 2 I Z IZ 3 low 1 Score is((S x Cjp;((iii)x(v)) - 2 Low .I i 1 SA)Groundwater Discharge/Rechargc Sine Rama Functional belowCheck the d4scharn indicators listed �p ! _Springs are known or observed in the AA.' eps are present at the wcdmd edge. ____Vegetation is growing during dormant `AA permanently flooded during drought periods. `bl�_ Hiab V I ` yrason or drought ►� law I I' ' etland occurs the toe of a natural slope. _Wetland contains an outlet,but no inlet _W at . -Omer NA Unlm NA ii.Check the rechamc indicators listed below that apoly to the AA AA is known discharge or recharge area or one _PeTmeablc substrate present without underlying impeding layer. or more indicators of discharge or recharge prc=t tEfigl�raugg•y ' —Other contains inlet,but no outlet No discharge or recharge indieators present- Low rating Other. Available odormation pertaining to AA is inadequate to judge dischuge/recharge potential- Unknown Comments: 15 j)Uniqueness Scorn ' i.Estimated relative abundance of f Pubis Poat similarly classified sits within the ii.Replacement potential/habitat 33 �� I Major Watershed Basin (a 11:circle points): diversity 012:circle ooints): Rare - 3 points AA is/contains bog,fen,warm springs or 31)2 Flab .9 2 is mature(>80 years)forested wetland - 10 points 22�J �� a bundant (►Pom AA does not contain above but habitat ' diversity is high•exceptional 3 points 12-21 Kgh .7 AA does not contain above and habitat 10,1 I Mod 6 diversity is low-moderate - Dpoint 'ii.Condition of AA(from Y 12:circle mints): 1.9 Mod .S ' Undisturbed 3 1 3,6,7 Mad Encmachcd Upon po Directly Disturbed room, 1 tow ' Comments: 1 1 Z 2.3 law Score is j(i)x(ii));(iii) 1 S.k)Recreation/Education Potential j. Is the AA a known reeled site(c'ucle)7 Y NN f ycs,rate as Hjgh and go to ii.If oo,go to iii.) ' ii. Check the categoric listed below that app y to the AA: edueation/seiend6c study Store Rahaa Functional ! _c9rtsumpdyc recreation point ! _ ✓✓nort{onsumptive recreation 6 Higb I _others: iii. Based on the location,diversity,s=CM other attributes of the site,is there strong potential for 3 Mod 7 mcreational/cducational use(circle)9 r lN'(If yes,go to ii,then proceed to iv. If no,rate as Low(.1 J.) �J < Mod 3 iv.Condition of AA(from N 12:circle point* v.Ownership of AA(circle Dooms)- ' Undisturbed Upon = painr� Public c po 2•` low 2 Encroached U n 2 po Dints` Private I mt Directly Disturbed l_Fps I law 1 ' Comments: L i Score is(iv)x(v) (D) 7 15.1)Dynamic Surface Water Storage(applies to wetlands that do not flood from ovcrbank or in-channel flow,but flood via ppL,upland surface Dow,or groundwater flow. If no jurisdictional wetlands in the AA are subject to flooding,circle NA here and proceed with the evaluation.) i.Estimated acreage of jurisdictional wetland in the AA ii.Estimated flood Score Retina F�mcrioaal that is subiect to txriodic flooding(circle points): freaucncv(circle points) Poinu Flooded wetlands i5acres = 3 Po' Wetland floods 15110 years=2 points 6 tiigb I 5 acres>Flooded wetlands> 1 acre= 2 po' Wcdand floods<5/10 ye = I poin i Fsgh a Flooded wetlands<1 acre .5 point 2.3 od s Conuncnts: Z l I Low 3 Score is(I)x(ii) 3 1 Low .I Function&Value Summary and Overall Rating X Z Function dt Value Parameters Rating Actual Possible Functional Units functional Functional (Actual Points x Estimated AA points Points Acreage) A. Listed/Proposed/Candidate Tl4tE Species Habitat �q-K) u , "3 I C . 01 B. M2,1HP Species Habitat 0 C. General Wildlife Habitat I p . 3 1 �. D. General Fish/Aquatic Habitat 4W C E. Flood Attenuation and Storage AJA, — A F. Sediment/Nutrientfroxicant Removal L";,Jn t I Q , G. Sediment/ShorclineStabilization IU _ A H. Production Export/Food Chain Support Mk� p • 1 Z• 0`� _ 1. Groundwater D scharge/Rccharge H- • 1. J. Uniqueness 0 K. Recreation/Education Potential V v.) C 1 0 L. Dynamic Surface Water Storage ' Totals Overall AA Rating(Circle appropriate category based on the criteria outlined below): 1 11 QI fV 0 I Category I Wetland-Must satisfy one of the following criteria: o Score of.9 or I functional point for Listed/Proposed/Candidate Threatened or Endangered Species;Qr o Score of.9 or 1 functional points for Uniqueness Qr"High"rating for Uniqueness and Condition(H 12)is"Undisturbed";or o Score of 1 functional point for Flood Attenuation.and Storage rpm answer to Question 14.E.3 is"yes";of o Total actual functional points>80%(round to nearest tenth)of total possible functional points. Category 11 Wetland-Does not satisfy criteria for Category 1 Acd: o Score of I functional point for Species Rated S I,S2,or S3 by the Montana Natural Heritage Program;pr o Score of I functional point for General Wildlife Habitat;21 o "High"ratings for both General Wildlife Habitat rg_id General fish/Aquatic Habitat;pr o "High"rating for Uniqueness 2rr o Total actual functional points>65%(round to nearest tenth)of total possible functional points. Category Ill Wetland-Does not satisfy criteria for Category I,Category in,or Category IV. Category IV Wetland-Does not satisfy criteria for Category 1,Category Q,or Category III and: o "Low"rating for Uniqueness;and ' o "Low"rating for Production Export/Food Chain Support;and o Total actual functional points<Mo(round to nearest tenth)of total possible functional points. (Fa) a G ENGINEER'S DESIGN REPORT 1 for Baxter Creek Business Park ' Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana 1 i f i RECEIVED By ' MAR 3 0 1999 CITY-COUNTY ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' 1.0 Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 ' 2.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 3.0 Existing Sanitary Sewer System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 ' 3.1 New Sanitary Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3 ' 3.2 Sewer Main Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 6 ' 4.0 Existing Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 6 4.1 New Water System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7 ' 4.2 Fire Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 9 ' 4.3 Total Peak Water Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 10 4.4 Water Main Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 10 ' 5.0 Stormwater Management Page 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . b g 6.0 Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page12 ' 7.0 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page13 8.0 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page14 TABLES ' Table 3.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 4 Table4.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 8 Table5.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page II i 1 i Engineer's Design Report for Baxter Creek Business Park ' Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana 1.0 Executive Summary ' Baxter Creek Business Park P.U.D.Subdivision lies within the Valley West Annexation.The project is proposed as a commercial development with strong emphasis on automotive related businesses. Sewer service for the project will be provided by connecting to the City of Bozeman's newly ' constructed Valley West trunk line. Water for the project will be supplied by a looped water main system connecting to the City ' of Bozeman's water main system at two locations. One connection will be to the newly constructed Valley West water main extension in Cottonwood Road, with the second connection made to the existing water main in Competition Drive within the J. C. Billion ' Auto Plaza Subdivision. These connections are detailed in Figure #1, `New Water Main Map". tStormwater runoff within the project will be directed by curb and gutter, storm drains and drainage swales, to detention ponds for treatment. Ponds will be constructed on each lot. ' Stormwater will be released from each pond, at a rate equal to or less than the pre- development runoff rate, to Baxter Creek which enters the site near the southeast corner of the project and exits the site near the middle of the north boundary line. ' Streets for the project will include the extension of Competition Drive from the J.C.Billion Auto Plaza to Huffine Lane(Highway 191)and Norton Street,a street proposed to eventually ' provide access to,the properties west of the project site. Figure #2 "Site Plan" details the proposed streets. These will be paved streets with curb and gutter. ' 2.0 Introduction ' Sewer Baxter Creek Business Park is an eight lot Planned Unit Development(P.U.D.) situated on 17.53 acres in the southeast one quarter of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 1 P.P.M., Bozeman, Montana. (See Vicinity Map Figure #3) Sewer service for the subdivision will be provided by the City of Bozeman's sanitary sewer system with connection being made to the newly constructed Valley West trunk: line. ' This trunk line was designed to serve those areas detailed in Figure#4, "Valley West Sewer Trunk Service Area", including the proposed Baxter Creek Business Park;project.Although areas to the west and south of the proposed project, outside of the Valley West Trunk Line service area, could be served by the proposed Baxter Creek seNver system, it is anticipated that these areas will be served by the Far West Trunk Line which is proposed to be built in ' the future. A possible alignment and service area for this proposed trunk. line is detailed in Figure #5, "Sewer Service Areas". Water Water for the subdivision's fire protection, domestic and irrigation needs, will be provided by extending the City of Bozeman's newly constructed water system, in Cottonwood Road, ' along Cottonwood Road approximately 300 feet to the north right-of-way line of Huffine Lane(Hwy 191),then along Huffine Lane to the west boundary of the Baxter Creek project. The City's water system in this area was designed to serve those areas detailed in Figure#6, ' "Existing Water System", which includes the Baxter Creek Business Park project. Areas lying to the west of the project could be served by further extending the water mains along Huffine Lane,West Babcock Street and Durston Road as detailed in Figure#7,"Conceptual ' Water Main Alignment." Stormwater ' Stormwater runoff will be detained and treated in structures constructed on each lot. All lots will discharge treated stormwater to Baxter Creek. A new culvert to be placed in Baxter ' Creek under Competition Drive will be sized to handle the largest possible flow which can enter the site, through the existing 54" CMP at Huffine Lane, and the predicted stormwater runoff from the new Baxter Creek development. Figure#9,"Stormwater Management Site ' Plan" details the location of the stormwater structures. Streets Competition Drive will be extended from the J. C. Billion Auto Plaza project through the project to Huffine Lane (Highway 191). Additionally, Norton Street will be constructed from Competition Drive to the project's west boundary. Both streets will be constructed ' with curb and gutter and sidewalks within a 50 foot right-of-way. Both streets will be paved asphalt 30 feet back of curb to back of curb. Figure #2, "Site Plan" details the proposed street alignments. The owners have committed to restrict on street parking along Competition Drive and Norton Street. This configuration will, in our opinion, provide a safer egress and ingress for the P.U.D. Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 2 ' 3.0 Existing Sanitary Sewer System ' The existing sewer system serving the Valley West Annexation is the newly constructed Valley West Trunk Line.This trunk line begins at the City of Bozeman's manhole#946.The line varies in diameter from 21 inch in the north reaches of the system to 8 inch in the south ' on Cottonwood Road.The Baxter Creek project will connect to the 8 inch reach of the trunk line. Connection will be made at manhole #10, a drop manhole, designed specifically to allow the Baxter Creek project a point of connection to the Valley West Trunk Line.Figure #8 details the alignment of the newly constructed Valley West Trunk Line. ' 3.1 New Sanitary Sewer Two approaches have been examined in predicting total and peak hourly wastewater flow ' generated by the Baxter Creek Business Park Project. Total flow and peak hourly conditions predicted along with City of Bozeman and State of Montana Specifications are to be used in determining the appropriate size sewer main for the project. I 1) The first approach involves estimating wastewater generation from usage data collected from the City of Bozeman's Water Department records for eight(8) areas tof automotive related business. Metcalf and Eddy's 3`1 Edition "Wastewater Engineering"pp. 25 suggest that 60 to 85 per cent of water use becomes wastewater generation. For this report 85 percent of water usage will result in wastewater ' generation. Table.3.1 details average water demand per Water Department's records and predicted wastewater generation for the eight commercial lots. Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 3 ' Table 3.1 Area of Automotive Average Daily Average Daily ' Business Water Use per Wastewater Business Type Generation Calculated (Gallons) per Business Type ' (Gallons) New Car Dealership 1,431 1,216 ' Tire Dealer 397 338 Brake and Alignment Shop 112 96 Muffler Shop 233 198 Body Shop 324 275 ' Auto Detail Shop 1,353 1,150 Auto Parts Shop 211 179 ' Auto Lube Shop 619 526 Total Water Use 4,680 ' Total Wastewater 3,978 Generation In addition to predicted wastewater flow, an infiltration/inflow (I/1) of 150 gallons per acre per day will be assumed as suggested in the City of Bozeman's draft ' `'Wastewater Facility Plan"pp. 87. 17.53 acres x 150 gpd/acre =2,630 gpd (2 gpm) ' Total Dailv Flow- From this information total flow generated by the Baxter Creek Business Park project is calculated to be 6,785 gpd. Total Wastewater Generation + (I/I) = 6,785 gpd ' Peak Hour Flow Peak hour flows are determined by multiplying the hourly flow rate for a twelve hour ' work day by a peaking factor and adding to it the calculated (I/I). Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 4 ' Peaking Factor-To calculate the peaking factor,the number of persons being served by the sewer system must be estimated. For this project it will be assumed that each ' person (customer and employee) will generate 12 gpd of wastewater. Error in this assumption will not affect the peak hourly flow rate significantly. ' Population = 3,978 gpd - 12 gpd/person = 332 persons Peaking Factor= 18 + �t o ulation in thousands= 4.06 ' 4 + Npopulation in thousands ' Peak Hourly Conditions = 3,978 gpd - 12 hr (work day) x 4.06 (peaking factor) + 120 gallons/hr (I/I) = 1,466 gallons/hr (25 gpm) ' 2) The second approach uses the City of Bozeman's draft"Wastewater Facility Plan" as a guide to determine population density, (I/I) and wastewater generation. Population Density - The draft "Wastewater Facility Plan", pp. 8 7, suggesrthat an overall population of 13.3 persons per acre be used for new development or 233 persons served for this project. ' 17.53 acres x 13.3 person/acre =233 persons P ' Infiltration/Inflow(I/I) - As indicated (I/I) is assumed to be 150 gpd/acre, "Wastewater Facility Plan"pp.87. ' 17.53 acres x 150 gpd/acre= 2,630 gpd (2 gpm) ' Wastewater Generation - The draft"Wastewater Facility Plan", pp. 84 suggest that a per capita flow of 117 gpd be used for new development or 29,133 gpd for this project. ' 233 persons x 117 gpd/person= 27,261 gpd ' Total Flow ' From this information, total flow generated by the Baxter Creek Business Park project is calculated to be 29,891 gpd. ' 27,261 gpd + 2,630 gpd = 29,891 gpd i I Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 5 0 • tPeak Hour Conditions Peak hour conditions are determined by multiplying the hourly flow rate for a twelve hour workday by a peaking factor and adding to it the calculated (I/I). Peaking Factor= 18 + v o ulation in thousands 4 +'Npopulation in thousands ' = 4.11 ' Peak Hourly Conditions = 27,261 apd - 12 firs (work day) x 4.11 (peaking factor) + 120 gallons/hr(1/1) = 9,457 gallons/hr(158 gpm) Conclusion Results from the first approach,detailed in this report,predict wastewater generation ' specific to the automotive related businesses planned for this project. Results from the second approach,detailed in this report,are more general,covering ' a wider range of business types and, as a result, predict a much higher wastewater generation. ' Although results from approach number one are more appropriate for this project,the far more conservative approach will be used to design the new sewer main. ' 3.2 Sewer Main Design An 8-inch diameter PVC SDR 35 pipe will be specified for this project. This pipe placed at minimum grade (0.4%) will flow 341 gpm, approximately two times the flow capacity needed for the proposed project. ' All work will be completed in accordance with Montana Public Works Standard Specifications with City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard ' Specifications, 4`h Edition. ' 4.0 Existing Water The existing water system serving the Valley West Annexation is the newly constructed ' Valley West Water Main Extensions which consist of 12 inch ductile iron mains extending along Durston Road to Cottonwood Road,along West Babcock Street to Cottonwood Road and extending along Cottonwood Road from Durston Road to a point approximately 300 feet Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 6 rnorth of Huffine Lane, (Hwy 191). Pressure reducing valves,placed at the intersection of West Babcock Street and Cottonwood r Road and on Durston Road near Ferguson Road, created two pressure zones. The pressure for those areas north of West Babcock Street are reduced to approximately 65 psi while the ' pressure for areas lying south of West Babcock Street remain at approximately 120 psi to 130 psi. Connection to the city's water system will include connecting to the newly constructed 12 inch Valley West Water Main Extension in the high pressure zone.The point of connection is approximately 300 feet north of Huffine Lane (Hwy 191), in Cottonwood Road. To provide a looped water system an additional connection to the existing 6 inch water main in Competition Drive, within the J.C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision will be required. r4.1 New Water System r As discussed in Section 3.1 "New Sanitary Sewer",two approaches have been examined in predicting peak hour demand for the Baxter Creek Business Park project. Predicted Peak hour demand coupled with fire flow conditions along with City of Boze.nan and State of Montana Specifications are to be used in determining the appropriate size water main for the project. ' 1) The first approach involves establishing peak hour conditions from usage data collected from the City of Bozeman's Water Department records for eight (8) areas of automotive related business. Table 4.1 details average water demand per Water ' Department's records. 1 1 r r r 1 Baxter Creek Business Park Design Report Page 7 r Table 4.1 ' Area of Automotive Business Average Daily Water Use (Gallons) ' New Car Dealership 1,431 Tire Dealer 397 Brake and Alignment Shop 112 Muffler Shop 233 Body P Sho 324 Auto Detail Shop 1,353 Auto Parts Shop 211 Auto Lube Shop 619 Total Water Use 4,680 1 Peak Hour Conditions ' Peak hour conditions are determined by multiplying the hourly flow-rate for a twelve hour work day by a Peak Hourly Demand Factor. For planning purposes the Peak Hourly Demand Factor used will be 3.02. "Maximum Peak Demand Factor was determined from the average ratio of ' Maximum Peak Daily Demand to Average Daily Demand during 1990, 1991, and 1992.Likewise,the Maximum Peak Hourly Demand Factor was determined from the average ratio of Peak Hourly Demand during Maximum Peak Daily Demand to Peak Hourly Demand during Average Peak Daily Demand during 1990, 1991,and 1992." This process is detailed in the City of Bozeman's draft"Water Facility Plan",pp.20. ' Peak Hourly Conditions = 4,680 gpd- 12 hrs (work day) x 3.02 (peak factor) = 1,177 gallons/hr (20 gpm) ' 2) The second approach uses the draft "Wastewater Facility Plan" to determine population density and the draft "Water Facility Plan" to determine daily water ' demand. Population Density - The draft "Wastewater Facility Plan", pp.87, suggest that an Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 8 overall population of 13.3 persons per acre be used for new development or 233 persons served for this project. 17.53 acres x 13.3 persons/acre = 233 persons P Daily Water Demand - The draft "Water Facility Plan", pp. 20 suggest that a per capita flow of 200 gpd per person be used for all future development. This demand estimate, as discussed on page 18 of the facility plan, includes: 1) Base Flow Water ' 2) Increased summer usage including lawn and garden irrigation, noncommercial car washing, cleaning sidewalks, and other miscellaneous tmetered uses. 3) Unaccounted for water usage such as street cleaning,hydrant flushing, sewer ' flushing, fire flows,flat rate accounts,leakage,and under registering€peters. 233 persons x 200 gpd/person =46,600 gpd ' Peak Hour Conditions Peak hour conditions are determined by multiplying the hourly flow rate for a twelve hour workday by a Peak Hourly Demand Factor of 3.02 as stated earlier. ' Peak Hourly Conditions = 46,600 gpd_ 12 hrs (work day) x 3.02 (peak factor) _ 11,727 gallons/hr (196 gpm) 1 Conclusion ' As discussed in the conclusion of the "New Sewer Main" section of this report,the first approach details predicted water demand specific to the automotive businesses planned for this site,while the second approach applies to a wider range of business ' types and, as a result,predicts a larger water demand. ' As in the sewer main design,the design of the water main will be based on the more conservative water demand predicted in approach number two. ' 4.2 Fire Flow Fire flow required for the subdivision is based on the 1991 Uniform Fire Code as it pertains Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 9 ' to buildings with wood frames (Construction Type V) and approved automatic sprinkler systems. The required fire flow can be reduced by 75%, but in no case less than 1500 gpm, ' when the building is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Total fire area will be determined using the building envelope for Lot #1 since this lot is planned to have the largest building. In Figure#10"Conceptual Plan", building envelope areas are defined. ' Building landscaping and sidewalks will occupy eight per cent of the a_ea shown with the building planned to occupy a portion of the remaining area. The maximum fire area for Lot #1 is 54,208 sqft. 58,922 sqft - 4,714 sqft (8 % bldg landscaping and sidewalk) = 54,208 sqft Required fire flow, as indicated in Table No. III-A-A of the Uniform Fire Code, for the 54,208 sqft wood frame building - 6,000 gpm ' Required fire flow after the allowable 75% reduction for approved automatic sprinkler system is applied - 1,500 gpm ' 6,000 gpm - 4,500 gpm (75% reduction) = 1,500 gpm ' 4.3 Total Peak Water Demand Total peak water demand for the project will include the estimated Peak Hour Demand and ' the required fire flow or 1,709 gpm. ' 209 gpm (Peak Hourly Demand) + 1,500 gpm (Required fire flow-) = 1,709 gpm 4.4 Water Main Design ' Water main design is based on the total peak water demand of 1,709 gpm. The system was analyzed using the Cybernet Computer Program. Results of this process, contained in the ' Appendix of this report,indicate that a looped eight(8)inch and twelve(12)inch ductile iron water main will supply the required fire flow during periods of peak demand. The looped system will connect to the existing six(6)inch water main within the J.C_Billion Auto Plaza ' and to the existing twelve (12) inch water main in Cottonwood Road. The eight (8) inch portion of the looped system will connect to the existing six (6) water main and extend through the project along Competition Drive to the north right-of-way of Huffine Lane (Hwyl91). The loop will be completed by extending the twelve (12) inch portion of the looped system from the existing water main in Cottonwood Road to the north right-of-way ' line of Huffine Lane (Hwy 191) and then along this right-of-way line to the west boundary of the Baxter Creek project, connecting to the eight (8) inch main in Competition Drive. Baxter Creek Business Park Design Report Page 10 All work will be completed in accordance with Montana Public Works Standard Specifications with City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, Fourth Edition. 5.0 Stormwater Management ' Stormwater runoff will be detained and treated in structures constructed on each lot. The ' natural topography of the area along with curb and gutter, storm drains with inlets,drainage swales and an appropriately designed site plan will direct stormwater to the detention facilities on each lot. ' Stormwater structures will be sized using the preliminary lot layout as a guide and"Rainfall Intensity - Duration Curves"for a 10 year storm event developed for the City of Bozeman. ' Stormwater runoff will include runoff from each lot, from Competition Drive, and for lots #1 and #2, the 50 foot wide open space corridor along Huffine Lane. Stormwater runoff ' from each lot will be directed in a northwesterly direction to a detention pond with release structure. The opening in the release structure will release flow equivalent to the pre- developed runoff rate. Table 5.0 ' Stormwater Detention Ponds Pond # Lot Detention Pond Size Release Rate ' 1 Lot#1 2,801 sf 1.12 cfs 2 Lot#2 562 sf 0.45 cfs ' 3 Lot#3 566 sf 0.45 cfs 4 Lot #4 389 sf 0.33 cfs 5 Lot#5 415 sf 0.35 cfs 6 Lot#6 528 sf 0.41 cfs 7 Lot#7 419 sf 0.33 cfs ' 8 Lot#8 435 sf 0.36 cfs 9 Storm Drain 1,243 sf 0.70 cfs ' Inlet Discharge from ponds 1, 7, 8 and 9 will enter Baxter Creek after treatment while discharge Baxter Creek Business Park Design Report Page 11 ' from ponds 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 will enter a drainage swale to be constructed along the west property boundary and discharging into Baxter Creek at the north boundary of the project. Modifications to pond dimensions etc., will be made as each lot is developed and the exact parking lot and building dimensions are determined. Calculations and inlet detail drawings are contained in the Appendix of this report. Baxter Creek,designated a stream/ditch combination on the City of Bozeman's Area Stream ' Map, has been realigned in recent years. Presently, it begins at Farmer's Canal near Cottonwood Road,just north of Huffine Lane(Highway 191). The alignment is detailed in Figure#10 "City of Bozeman Area Stream Map". The stream/ditch drains approximately 100 acres before entering the Baxter Creek Business Park site through a 54" CMP culvert. The new culvert proposed for Baxter Creek under Competition Drive will be a 48" RCP ' culvert. A 310 Permit Application has been submitted and approved. The existing 54" CMP crossing Huffine Lane (Highway 191) has the capacity to flow 151 cfs under full flow conditions. The proposed 48" RCP has the capacity to flow 200 cfs, approximately 46 cfs more than the maximum flow predicted to enter the site from south of Huffine and the predicted stormwater runoff within the site. Calculation worksheets for the 54"and 48"RCP culverts and a copy of the approved 310 Permit are in the Appendix of this report. . 1 6.0 Streets ' Citystandard street sections for paved streets with curb and utter and sidewalks are p g ' proposed to be modified for this development. These streets will only serve the properties within the subdivision. Rights-of-way proposed for Competition Drive and Norton Street are 50 feet in width and pavement is proposed to be 30 feet, back-of-curb to back-of-curb. ' In addition,the street right-of-way to be dedicated for the future connection between Fallon Street and Competition Drive will be 50 feet in width. Figure#2 "Site Plan", details street alignments and rights-of-way. Each lot will have ample parking for customers and ' employees, and on-street parking would be prohibited. The design objective is to open up the street scape and the elimination of on-street parking is intended to help accomplish this. With on-street parking eliminated,the proposed 30 foot street width is sufficient. ' Competition Drive will create a new connection to Huffine Lane(Highway 191). Extension of Competition Drive will require the abandonment of the existing gravel cul-de-sac within ' the Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision. All lots within the development will have access to interior streets. No lot will have direct access to Huffine Lane (Highway 191). ' The minimum asphalt pavement thickness for the extension of Competition Drive and Norton Street shall be three (3) inches with a minimum of four (4) inches of 1" crushed Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 12 1 • ! 1 roadmix and a minimum of eighteen (18) inches of 6"minus pit run gravel. 1 Curb and gutter will be constructed on both sides of each street and sidewalk will be constructed on both sides of Competition Drive. ' 7.0 Conclusion Sanitary Sewer Main An eight(8)inch SDR 35 PVC sewer main will serve the needs of the Baxter Creek Business Park. The new sewer main will connect to the Valley West Trunk Line at manhole#10.The 1 Baxter Creek Business Park lies within the Valley West Sewer Trunk Line service area. Water Main Peak hour water demand and the required fire flow will be provided for Baxter Creek Business Park through the proposed looped eight(8) inch and twelve (12)inch ductile iron water main system. The looped system will connect to the existing water main within the J. 1 C.Billion Auto Plaza and to the existing water main in Cottonwood Road.The Baxter Creek Business Park lies within the Valley West Water Main Extensions service area. Stormwater Stormwater will be directed to stormwater detention ponds for treatment before leaving the ' site. These structures will be designed to treat stormwater from a 10 year storm event. The stormwater will be released from the ponds at a rate equivalent to the predeveloped runoff rate. 1 Streets City standard street sections for paved streets with curb and gutter and sidewalks are ' proposed to be modified for this development. Rights-of-way proposed for Competition Drive and Norton Street are 50 feet in width and pavement is proposed to be 30 feet,back-of- curb to back-of-curb. In addition, the street right-of-way to be dedicated for the future 1 connection between Fallon Street and Competition Drive will be 50 feet in width. The minimum asphalt pavement thickness for the extension of Competition Drive and ' Norton Street shall be three (3) inches with a minimum of four (4) inches of F crushed roadmix and a minimum of eighteen (18) inches of 6" minus pit run gravel. 1 Curb and gutter will be constructed on both sides of each street with sidewalk constructed on both sides of Competition Drive. 1 Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 13 ' 8.0 Recommendations Sanitary Sewer Service Areas west and south of the Valley West Annexation should be served by the proposed Far West Trunk Line which may be built in the future. The designed capacity of the Valley West ' Trunk Line did not include these areas. ' Water Service To serve areas outside of the Valley West Annexation an additional twelve (12) inch water main should be extended along the proposed alignment of Fallon Street from Ferguson Road ' to Cottonwood Road. This additional water source will be needed to meet the peak hour demand and required fire flows for the surrounding areas when they are fully developed.Due to the topography of the area water main pressure for areas west of the Valley West Annexation and south of West Babcock will be excessive (greater than 125 psi), therefore pressure reducing valves should be placed on all water mains extending beyond the Valley West Annexation. In addition the twelve(12)inch water main constructed in West Babcock ' Street .and connected to the high pressure side of the City's water system should be terminated at the western boundary of the Valley West Annexation with only connections south of West Babcock Street and within the Valley West Annexation allowed without a ' pressure reducing valve. ' As development continues westward, water service can be provided by extending the 12" water mains located in Durston Road, West Babcock Street and near the north right-of-way line of Huffine Lane(Highway 191). Figure 147`'Conceptual Water Main Alignment"details likely water main locations. Streets To meet traffic demands anticipated as this area is developed,area streets and roads will need to be upgraded and extended. Figure #12 "Conceptual Road Alignment" details this plan. East/west extensions extend Fallon Street, West Babcock Street, Durston Road and Oak Street to Jack Rabbit Lane. Extend Cascade Street to Cottonwood Road and eventually to Jack Rabbit Lane if needed. North/south extensions: Extend Ferguson Road and Cottonwood Road to Baxter Road. Upgrade Gooch Hill Road between Huffine Lane (Highway 191) and Durston Road and construct an additional north/south street midway between Cottonwood Road and Gooch Hill Road. These extensions will provide local traffic alternate routes to residences and businesses which will be built along the Huffine Lane (Highway 191) corridor. Baxter Creek Business Park ' Design Report Page 14 I 1 � 1 APPENDIXI FIGURES I ' 1 NEW WATER MAIN MAP 1 BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK - PUD 1 CONNECT TO MANHOLE #10 �,o VALLEY WEST TRUNK MAIN - h ± 680. EAST TOWD s 1/f°sac. s ,�yaz mnr ^'T• t YOOf ALY Glp,JLUSH FOUND S 1/16 SEC. 9 m°3 4- MOOT ALM. CAP, FLUSH x LOT 7 � 49.836 sf 1 Y 1 TIE INTO EXISTING 8" SEWER LOT 6 I 53,344 sf 28,479 sf MAIN AT APPROX. 50 FT. EAST I- H PROP INE. v COMPETITION DRIVE 1 / REMOVE EXISTING THR ST BLOCK & \ LOT 8 TIE INTO EXISTING 8" WATER LINE AT 51,512 sf APPROX. 10 FT. WEST OF THE TEE. ' LOT 5 36,043 sf 1 C)LOT 4 35 296sf 74.535 sf , N INSTALL 8" VALVE s a COMPETITION \e c LOT 3 DRIVE a ' I 48.012 sf REMOVE 1.2" CAP \ & THRUST BLOCK LOT 1 227.393 sf g ' I O GRAPHIC SCALE _ =I. LOT 2 v+`•' O �0 0 100 200 400 52.013 sf mm o Z ( I �1 0 m p INSTALL 12"x8"x12" TEE ` ''`r2. ' w/THRUST BLOCK =t O 1 inch IN FEET200 ft. V > rN INSTALVAL2 0 0 '90'TALL BEND 2 1 I Lit m.r II u u FIGURE #1 MORRISON SSONEERS ymits ❑L MAIERLE,INC. 9 M 9R -pw1,..-o„T.a 1A—„—v Pb Be 1111 201 W-69 9.d B.m Yf 5MI.Ph.-(WQ W-011 F-(4m)SCI-111E 3130.001 EXHIBITS NEWWATER.OW(. . 1 IST1N SITE PLAN FOR: ASP I I ' 00 BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK - PUD �21 ° I BOZEMAN, MONTANA ' A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4, SECTION 9, T. 2 S., R. 5 E., P.M.M. �umo,oc aaa L' CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA I I / I I I OWNERS: GARDINER GREEN, JR. I I vol faro?I, MONTANA RANCH PROPERTIES, INC. 20 00 0�► 2Lo TRIPLE THREE, LLC 1w / I I Ul for 0 yot+ P yo j ' I I 1 USD s 303 WINTERGREEN LANE coY os l j1 / j I I s BOZEMAN, MT 59715 g11118t0 ■ p I I ]CSU80� EDGE OF ' I I LIFT STATION EXISTNG STORM STORY POND /, I I / SHALT STORM POND DRAIN IN IRRIGATIO VAU I j go >� ' p CONTROL 119 8110 60• PANEL ,I /• fh C D �I SOC31'OS'W, 1229.24' ii13 _ _ -te --- 316' / PIPE e. 374' OPEN I OUTLET STRUCTURE BAXTER CREEK ® / ® SPACE 273' !Loam■n',� 4—k ro.o■/r CORRIDOR w.m omw o I OPEN SPACE' o�y 74,536 sf /• . a•n.Rr� LOT 8 _ 2 0 51.512 sf CR66K/ ' I I LOT 7 o N /• / / e11 I I 49.836 sf FIELD CC F MS j Ih- 1pO A I h I ea /•pf11r�'/� 17 1 I I � •E t'°'' qi � I LOT 1 I 1 227.393 sf 8,752 in IIN / N � '0014 16 m / BAXTER CREEK vi v I Z /• PgfA CORRIDOR �` 1 ` \QIyfPl'1 OPEN SPACE \ \ '• P 28,479�' •o 1 ; C� 2—EXISTING'' j5. I o� iv H�CE�S o 0 756' 15 IWI o o0 m o c — •• — I a I CcF to m I I 260' I I p I I I I _ 1 I I 10.003 sf 3 ' I I LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 4 $ 12,013 sf o o LOT 3 o LOT 2 53,344 sf 36,043 sf 35,296 sf w '� N 48,012 sf N 52.013 sf I I cl q l g � I I o I 50• I ,� I �I z _ o Zo EDGE OF I f ASPHALT 3 / I I 374' NOC40'07'E, 122 61' i l r■mr.,,rr \ K i®ewo TJ NO 24 CMP GRAPHIC SCE MORRISON su m ■ � PLANERS a MAIERLEjNC. SINCE N ' IN Meer) Ao Z-pta..-Ou—d Cb,p,,,, 1 Lneh- 100 rL (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) PA B=1113 901 TmVdag Bbd Bmu1 VT 59791•Ph—(408)517-Ml F=(409)597-1118 3130.001 EXHIBITS FlG2.OWG VICINITY MAP r,�. } '\�::•' ;,•� f g (( E-•, I t�' •� P I \. c sar u� �. c•,� :. ,�� ••i.t,._��y'�+.. `^, I ! }, j t_ .i .� �'•� l '{� fJ f+. ��r \ \�` ! '� O-•-• 1` � i:� � ..� ,f:.y e•.. �;;'��' - ,__ ..fir-1•y._.. �.. /r rF.J? �'1.. `•, .p, { 1 �\ �.._...._�•yy r I �ti,�\,. ..r�;_.'-J �i. r`i .ti^} �\♦ {���..{�,. ..r.0 . ,�� -fit + ��—_.,.1�" r: � `�'.�) I L,t�•`....^ � �+ a,l'; _''��.�'e, � s.�a-� `.`,•;..__,t....- Fq • ...,�fJ ..___r�:- r `irf ... :\� d<�,�.. � f 1 \.:�A1 (('i-__,•E..- 1, .�P..k,l j, �^ r `ram,` �656 ,\1 ` rVr;i�`` '.i' `.��•.'�'(�-'F��'i --_..y, a 1 �r' ` `',i r N.Y _ •r-r`t-".` ��` �rl" ,�._� ', r_� aca r=t' �rr_ �,' ...+ p ,: r I �-. _. � i - -:. ,,•_:.,��•">�.„—. — — — — --4'� I. tit ' _ �' �� _ „'�;- , I .. 9p:�` �t'- _._._._ -Y- 1...-....�_...._,, .li LIgNI ' \ G"`( c:,,rF1'!k}r 5:a.;� I �h \�t,'�Y,' /' 1 Ali'••,i ;i r. \\ I .I `+..- I V ` .1 'o;"._ •yy i, v`-'i(.. ti y.. �.. ;, i �'•�ei'i„ 66s 30 J9 , fi R67 ''-6�♦-� -`t •.I "��� I E It, t3si. - .Y.�..__ •y3 ` 3���.,' , q1. i._ .�. �7�J "" 1:,J •' ' - ± 11 1 ,� i 1\ _ b: !rs°ate ,--- i•,t 1 rs""� arcs, r\•; r , . ( --! ( � 'y ijr \,r ,I ' �Sr.�.•``,.- I i l !C•��,_ `'I .. .�>: .i I4 .. { •, yj3' `� i +,) i , 1 '• -._.X ��' --. •.TF•. `7.:.aq 3D.1r.� gill, (' �e�.• � � �I,�i ` .i i i 1/ /' ,' , t...-..: .�_.._-�:-.:3., •,I f7•,.:"t` i;-'ys4 rtrr< try' 111 -, ry:jr•s'• .. c„� '9 _ a {�1 �..r — _ ' 4• :f- 'l. r^.•t. , r I f 72ST• i I u, -.fir 'i ... 1` ��-- j .. _..,'{V: .A 4R SSc�a2ES'I i'� - ..���i � 11'cl, F' ^,1• I ,1 -....�� I -_� _-,\• �! R �!E f 1 I� I n6..\4�,�E c s \, •� I 1' •--'-=a1/ aS�a_ Y•�-�{. •._,,,,..._ `— �j; ,.G.`g. ._ 9ztoTl _ ,aY ,_ 3 r '>y I •, ,i ----�'� �f��. , ��:•6� .�� ` !ij-c:'•:�` -'- I I l;�r ;�t,�-,:��',,,a,...if I,�"",hr,' t' I ' _,�,f. -.�l ` r•' � � I i I t-- __j� I� �'% �• ;I11_i. .i k — ,_.................. _- P° �I ! ..`: ,�1.._- �,• I. 'I Jfn I r' �ar `✓'' e ,�.ir � Sri �J FI .r nr r r'� J ......, _ • i 11 j i:..._;j.'i r�.i�, EI e.- "\ _ ,1 ' .i• 11@� - I .::._It.� l4 •R �C ..1• �• Y�Y t PP�r' .i.,, -1 '7'il'.1 ' �•:x. .,u , r rE) ,1,11` I �� s-s A -..9...-••' e:`• , i9 r `_.K`.�`J .ir..4 r.rG.`• ,7;Nfl ��ri.yr Jr .�.`r ,.� .i s !1 1 .I�_`:-• � i-.. I I'i. I I�., @fir ` ;'� , , r I r,( ,✓' .- r+:, r ..�,,��.• �I• �• ,r':. I ! ,!•: I 1 I I 1•_ r-j...-�' �� �p,r r i•_�€'& E?c 1 .k ,�!lir 1.'�;��# J _A�,x J ,�, 'ih, '�' :•LI'`•',i\, T•r./'j"•v-� \iai �`' i JJ '� `' i I ,_�� � E P v..1•,�(y✓:; I; +r: ,}' � rr!rSi^ '•. I .l'' _.:E, y,�37 19°»'.i ✓•''L.� � .xs.�e,. d.F ` ( ., 5�,.�t.._ nlr f .'' -..i•. ee$r•:'��Iq� ji ,nJ , ��•• _ f I•rU ° �' � ,m, 6�71f �.,,.-.�` _ '� hvl� ' J L 7 qs,��• r 1 - �-' far.:�' I �r -1 �B ll __.. .ii �� /-i+ � --. 1 fi99r� I I __ �' ..�_ �€ €�'[I � F �t�•y I y.r✓ 6 i�' 1' i�•..`Y: ea en. � ,F'~ ':-� „I�} �y �,- _ - ' _ 1.7 ril.'y . t t r ' ,;.JS)':�Y aS •.i(-..... `�,T _ ........ .. -__ ......_. -..... ..... �.I..._ i:i..v:"+ �ti'" '.@�r .'\+•��,'S Wry �9 r a6 44141. a-: I ' �m -`` - �._�_ •99JI Th I: _J np' x9.!..t ,... •- __ r!€ ; t ,;r� �y. ,,�• `. 4I,,.-: .,.. �. '.,;' Grp `r-- ;,r...._..... {1 •��1! ....�?:Z ^' -�:f'- ag,.��'•'• r,.J r•`"I"�_J_ o� \ -.�..- :`�^;�.....__ -- !rI r '�, / �pr.,. !J ..!, k,.� ��'��. I ;, ..., ,k I j ''�� •--- -Ji•-%" t. � Ip. 2 �,tJ"`� ''11t,4'•.>: •J%�"` ai' ,.r ad• 11i €L. i� ' -'--"-f_. I' ! ( ' I f. i fi••'_... .. >.h, .•I.-- :'6 :.�i �.�i f .,.' Maio.. -.�•_. .'- � ��2� '�aio'I_..�. pj ':i.... �g ,aR. � i�• *'. ;�'�' ''stir.,._... r;9•.'r' ':>,�•��� _��'� � , ,�; Jg,,' .. --- - '•`'�-��. 1 .,. ^0.•..J.li-.�K'. iL-------'mow �•• .r: Al �,t;Hll' '�;�6;,L'���� `'1t' ;'�p a�fr-•/' _ _' � :vas•'`L _ r �9.r '7 rr1 @ .:J !:'b,.• '5,9: ..f•' 1.y^ir' /'• :•i' ,r"''� '0.7 r•17 SGQ<'..T• SDi9T ISD•.'Ir ib •s;' V.,, ;-'ems-•>.»• ••`�'a . il FIGURE //c. -:�..t..:•. � '. ;,......,,ti.r.�„-� r vas sr'i .�! �, ,/'� 1 i i �,�,......�_.41>, t f•J1'"1 GRAPHIC SCALE ,\ 1 ,:y r'r c _ .V�t• '+H Q:;�'i� ' .h... 35iJ [~ ..r' I --'�-- r_1`q _ ---'--' �i j4 `!(+y``1•l ys, _ f ,.. .�!.• s;<,� '�,I r/`•... , .r It _.. _ _ 1_._ 'I ` i '�C QICil7RS. /: r ,.J .;i;fr � is,.. � � ,�•• -��._ Y-�.. .. I - SURVEYORS 4000 0 2000 4000 8000 .. ' r.._ !,. ,, ry:�� Yc`.: u`'":�� sas° 3 e MORRISON MAIERLE,IKC. . - PA Ba 1113 991 0d 9oaraR rr 39T/1.P� uq 6S7-M Fa(4"50-11m ( IN FEET ) REASON DATE: REVISION GATE: 1 inch 4000ft. DRAWN BY:KW DATE,02/01/99 CHECKED BY: DRAWNG NO.: VMAP-F3.DWQ ' JOB NO.: 3130.001 010 0310 SHEET 1 OF 1 1 V � - -_ - VA7LLEY WEST TRUNK SERVICE ARET 1p r: II • r _ %.— + i/ ♦,y ..� I f1 l!'• r�`�,� \ 4`' I M `. 1' � �• '`,, , c`♦+,\ �• ♦�` �',,; -...---h., "C- ��•` �S' ��c.._. � .I,i�V ! I �� `5 11-\t ` � -..�---__'_ ( ` 'F i ,�. ��\ 'i%,�„i-[=,, �.-'`. '\5 . t9c�rr� t.l. S ♦ �'t� `eh` _�?® I .... ,..._...._.•. --- _om � .il...�__.,, �9 �'iy- _-•v: ":'^,...� �3�'�r'-G�'•--�:—�-�.^.,••sC. ,�ws _ y� ...... ,♦f j�:! .h;,,.> ol �I: �t`*i.l � ' f: 1 \a'� ''/"\v „ � _ .5� '::L,i �I \\ :_i" �.�• wa � t �... I � r/ :\�"'-ja-' '..�Pi y ,. �_.r,� ::_ F ''• 189......T11 ,'l, `Ir•BP I ASi<' \. ,' I 1',�_ t �tI _..�,::�`^Sua..e/s. -' - - - '`" -ti� �I�f 1 �\l ���'•., ��� ... e_�N, i' i/'d 5 `\.!• ,,, ^� [t_i. ' _— C. '\. ice;, pr•.,i ri • `` ,45`t�Q, .`it 1 r "(..... _ �+1i41+9 ♦L'6+ 3'7 I '• !: I RD7 \ lc"^`•t�: ••.. I 'S _.�. `, i- Il/ 5 i ��„�. : I .r 4 � � wa:6� --��•��1 - ... �5 'sue- �1.. �q ..." ..... v:.... !...��' � � .��_ `mot. .. �`� ,'prdt 4t!!r\r `'''1 I 1 tr•''._.`.'..•r •i t t •;'[.GM.:S ,•1 t f� 6�:e �rr[�"' r' �-1.4�I-nr•L r -I / spy lii .i '.,` , 1 _,I'_ :.r_ ' I L. -" '• ., `i.,:.q try•14 '`: ( !=h "�...\� , i' t I /�' 0 I .:j......`'~�:.. •�#.. .� nacT� i;_.�� .w.<•l^ enz q' �•, �. . .Y^, ,,7l4c <lJatOy'I�r•• '•-•�;,`+t� 25- - :�� 'y.0 .. .472S I [ _..I! �1 •�:�i� r����. _ : L 7• v,, J. \. �,,LL I •. _ , '� t G:�t,•1 k... .. I -u ;•r.+};1___.. I'.. I• '__.� ,� •—..�� -'ai._ -- !I'. - _- - 3 ;11,�1"".III'. �' L 1 ..., _ I W.'b.= 3��;� :6 I 7� �,� �.�' ri'-`':•,?i�;- I��•• •'�' i•' ;(�•'s�,f' `` III �I IIII!IIII��IIII ,II III V I� � t --- 1 I I•� ■' •;III:�.+.,.i ,#:. !!x: � ' .... .....:./r/-�,'�"(' ;r•" _`r[:a- `l. •'�� I II li 'I Q',.___—l—L-----(� '•.i-.__._...-. ..__.., �.,� !! .. LI. ICI, J'.I II Jllddl'd, •,� I r n . iL I u ..;.. .-••. ' ,.. `u u�un iiun nn l:il e '`7'i69't". .•1 C T� { i',//r`-•" :•:•,:,m'�-�`li ._ •F•C/ I �I 'II .I.,.i ......: I.. i e.• � t �k k __ •��.♦:.,. �=", - � - ,• I�'' I I " VAL LI' I''^Y'� E�STU ° �i'i' � '� [�� � ' �� �� ... .. � -..-.../ I /"- •` l u I C1, Illllllill a II .. :, ..✓�/:I' .I ,.-.ni.,., ` , i-� .... III III �lul lllnl III 1 in ! -i. ,h � - ..f: � `:.'J,Q i �; .:r, •l`Ir'' - -1 ' ,��• �_ I P I• i;Il l l�i I,II �IIII�I I I I,.�I a;�a-- L_.;.i_ ,��,r 1 �S �'n ,;F` t�l �_ �a �_ s .I I :Ti T r s IIII •i• \\+ /' 1. __ .s~ .II, , II�:/':', .Ii l i �'I''•': .Ir ¢ �-w. I I i •t `I.Rf N r �£. v :f !� i _ /� "r• �AXT -R-�C E .� I �I� .; [�r- ;,I "i�`���.% a' � �I�� •.�''IiP IIII (� i .;� ! �' ,•-' �, ' I��� I i ,p,�T ..`.. ""'7'h' f.r F•k. '•'6:..�-: .11. 1 U-r.9'IN 7S.S: .A r. r,; __ ! •.,. — i III I Inl ulr.. I -.�_I;CI .'6'0 7J e ''c •r +� '..J 1. aye y. `,,;,t :i,• y ,' I'1 i 1 i x y 'T �a I:: :'c'.«; .f �-.�' ry,- .�- IIII I ��I i i ,r ..�. t +!� �� .. • , .. ..� :: ;(. I•• ::x } ' 1:1'//' ...� ''��• -� ! .ill 'Iil �.I I L _- r-�'._.�,-i(. ::Ir .._ .r .frl I:W� -I♦` N1,15 ' / III I i II .� .:�. i 4 ! 't� II 7 �•1.5'I, iVi� <�'\, /.• ..I ` ;.. `i 'T• \1 .�'' I IIII -_ .9✓. V ;: 'r,':`','' � r A�c1i-% I ":1. ^•�[� ,F.r�_• �; la•z•i 'I �I � IIII 7..1., ,1�,a,,/' ♦.i /f' � , 1_:,�' r etS•. , is:. r 1 I t �: I :�:..._G q -�;. -:._e,,,l.--,f I,'. •',.,. . ,. ..•:•'• .I - -'St iY :.i ...."- .I;. ,lfi�Ni ^, I;q `',' .... •.r a{• •'•t r'-' @ 4l ..._...I I�.'�[Md'�� _ i I. � :1 •;, p '� .y p.k{'U '' rki�- S' .� , �-� ••, '. ', S- .., /._ •-__ '✓•� _ /'i- 1 10497 I � j } '�� I' }p yr �, . ♦. ;, 1 '.,,�/�i,. ..`I ..'1 n¢c.C' t{76' ti'iv -.%J •I �:� �^• --'•.1-'_' •'Y-` •i j°L_! I31 ! v !•,� _ Y y�♦ .... ♦i f f��•/•rII i I � :.I^pr ;•• i _ 1 .�',•• •! E- �, 'a,I !•A'fCr ~�.'t;,3. co3V !,'7Jr',' .:3~t'F.S...�'r ••��� y.' '�• v, tA.r.' .>: ....y,,... Y ♦ J i ! p��} •... •�I. iI j ''!'4tll .M. a^,./ ;'. p+. ,.�L•1 0l I •``{'I f ~•)`.�f .Jp'�V, •i { l �..r�. EEEf�f -•r; _ I� f,, J. c _ _ •.I�� .� �i g.G::.. '=./ � 1 I •�:- --_ � 'I-._ I 1 .1._.- :__.^r.' �'1ATI ;,f :' l ��.1, ,'•1J1 -' ♦,.;h-_._�.� •C325,•�_���, ..? .vl. , , /:ai�T- :-.., rr.r ; p- i:`• _ `` a''.._- '( ki .K;LS•...-.... .I L------�txc�_ti `i" ____.•�_: a^ , FIGURE #4 - 99rT •'r - o^n. SG � N v - ' � :.'F'`r-:°�i-'--r=�.-•,'a;'iL'w �a<,yi.:.alp•al a36r'�"r'� _............... '�/� .... �~ w�' �I� ^i.. I GRAPHIC SCALE :�� _. � ', '. ,,i, ....-. .........��:� :.., ..� ;- l3�5•. �r-- �� _ _ . �. ..� ENGWEERS SC OMSTS -�'�•:,fr-:- ,•i� 'i. o. isa�r,"•"...I r e�27,♦ MORRISON 4000 0 2000 4000 8000 -••.%I ��.-. ..-_ L•�_ :. Fr.�•:'.h4u'i�.f ,� �.'1"a •.:J3-�'9 � � •�Yl ••3, —t I SuRwmRS MAIERLE,INC. FLOMERS PA,II:1113 9N 7�SK 0mnlla YI$9771•ftM 5U-M 7=(400)W7-1170 ( IN FEET ) - REVISION DATE: - REV1S10N DAZE: 1 inch = 4000ft. DRANK BY:KW DATE 02 01/99 CHECKED BY: DRAWING NO.: VW-SA-F4.DWG JOB NO.: 3130.001 010 0310 'SHEET i OF 1 . ... .. .. ... ...... ...... SE AREAS /, ,,1 ;,,,•�. 0,• {{ /�' 1, ,• ,'^ I �:'•. - . "'�}' •��� ' _=-' It ,1 �.._ .. .....-. • •, -.._ ..... ......:(.. }` # _ =�: — sear. .,� .�. _ �,- _ •�. ,>, _ . .. . ... . . .. .... .. .. ._i _� �JO•'^`.il � J1 .i e9� , -.H- -"Y' - .475-.�'��• ��--r _ � �. , .L:i �L,,,,::� .:'cL.-•w; .. .. P.k J ♦-. - - f_. �. .l dd(( �! �I ti. to T:� Eni `\ �•i� -Y .J. - �: .•.1, bi ! - f-: I i -.. III ..a.2.. �`2 R t :� ... .. .... , 1 r .. ,. 'i. -- }. ,�•�,• V•y f� --.-- "1�! ''I'78',�",.� :p°atlpp6 C4F'y.'� I I `�--^- .f .. �y:.,i ;l_+..-,y.'2.l .. .. .. ..1 'I/ '• (( f ��,' I', •IIII':"`n.55::•:,•°."tl$99:°fi9 ."a III;' ¶:,��. .. I ). ,. I I.i - / 1' �i.7ra.. .�.a ,l N f•} ♦C 1�- . .... .. .. ... 'tl / I. .._t- ,_ /~ '•tV 1 ,t 1p�-I w Il j..,l:� C �. ',`fr' �`• '•!i ''t t III: � :$,• •::�:,ttl:ll II. I• ti er .. I ... •►•:ram �.I I '�•f'. ., ` � •:1 , rAhkr- ,, j -.�j.r..a��"tl e8tl.°a::4:r. a .IIII �,• �:'� i,, .. .. .... ., l l \ � 'r., i•tbZll � 1+ d$�PY i�, 1..._ "Il.6:I"I I,.,..� AS?xll'I."I7".'f.,)1'I'IIII�.F.dI q l 1. :xdE••4°••,:r_� -.�I I II..�I` \� ��.�? 1 I 1, .. .. - ♦ •.r-•.: •".....-.F -•--„. - v 1. ^,i'� "'�_; J. 1 ; II:Ilaq II I {!'TI:'�II :1"�rl :i�u-r�a- ^ ,� •.T �f�•�,a� --� ,L, .. ;i• - ~: ' \I II! , !.°:r.l-dill IIII id illl.., IIa..a: a9 9" 5r J µ' �• •-. Q.Q.L.-...� .,I;•.r•j I !n I ,.1'r� i^ - - a I. I 111}I n I .I I I, I .tl2 n�n3nG:3'I 3 9�tl: ",•�`. ,, I i III '... % I IIII ,'MINI ( 151.1. .aa. �•tl''i } `•v ♦ ♦ �I• .a. ,t•. rl i I I 't ill `i:. /• U„� `'1' •I I d' I:,�1 III I I lib �..� I I �- `I l: i >te�•''' i ,i `v! I t I III,II IIII i•!11 I I :t I II' 1 -I �i. I I - f l II I I• � I I r I i•I II I�= I�4• n•• a 1 , I :�"s• UG.� _ I I o ax. I I 5 Lr I• I I I I I �? YA I,i :I E. 4! `I p II !I a �- _ II 3 , :I I� -'s• "I I I; � I. �.. III r a. I - t I ,. I I II .�. I I• a I -II arc, III T.. I I III I -.I I I i �I .r. 11. ' I I I I •� t� I I NI'Il�llllllll lu. l l I I ':N: r Illil�l,.l..11..11 I �I I I tu., I11�IIr:�.•>. ..z ...:-:...;:;:: °� .... . . .. .. .. , ..�, .o- \ _.:`(,j`i .T� '1, cl' :I r.L. .j.. d ,s!_. ./•^ nql lnl - ♦ U�a'w p r..':7 i T , S,•- y.(' IIII III �•NII IIII td I,I: Its °xd a•:: 3fi_� q. I _ j: `, i 'ti �� 'I ti II .il. ,'I r IIIII ��• .�N�" •':'` �'L .. . . :;/. ,v' I t e� '�" i •<r �I I I�I 'i .,;E3� :fla r I III.- F•' �r..:ra , '.I ,I „I:i •,� I '.!I I I,II I 1=• I7 I I I I I. .. � .. ..• L'•.. ..._% ,. i _ ... '! •y r..11l � �:' I: 1.16,11 '• �� n e:t II IT?•. I: n: I _ �� �� •-�•� � ,. .. .... . .. ,. •. d :•.y •-,t �!' I!s'r II I II I l lall�: , f 1 •�. .�.$.I;. II,I I IRIII I I'i't; -:D'I I..r±ATa ... .. t - . r•,::.% ,.�h .-_T .:.. :.--_...- •..v -, •srt,?u.r•,:,1111111111111�IIIId11111101II".I�Illplllm@911:.r,!+?'11., .IIII IL�.nI9a i,r....,.,ll u11 n�I III N!I �:gI, I I,,:.Ilu 111[,,.I I III I I L...._. .. I :/��. ,.'il 1 . r' 14.:P57 II 1 I I �nr ir� II' :I II. va'C Ir 1 I II's:� I I i�• I: I I I• I 'IIII'- I �p II I I I I I I v, I rl Ir I i I I. r IwI i'III II I II I II I >_ - I i I a• -- - •�° I I I III. II I! I I ,•fl eQ• I• I'J' ,I I IrI' I I I I I I I 11 I 11 i'1 f� I I I:•.'�sn '1 Itll 1.1 L11 I nlm I: I I ' III.• I r I III" °• � t �.' !l ..`.':•..� ':.._ 7 ,.'.�.. ,' iuuL.,d Idilll'Ilr m nrlm 1. I I' I� !, __n,.Jr •nr-. -�-----..�----= �.. •..•,� �.�. :• . , : � I�!Ili I IIIII I I I -�:. � __ I ��_ � I ♦ �I' III I I I I � IIL .�e a .n' ..�I -� : - N II I - .. 'I.. :- . ............... .. _.......:.....'..........:............ : ...:..,: ............ .................. .... ........-........ ...........................•-,•�.:cI„�Yf.nh`..,�::���yrI 1a',�'.�,�.::.�,r.••_:I:-r:':.�r,�,q�,;.:,�.J,{,s„l'',:�_t•...r.'..�'�n_a'I,�;.;t-I.P t-'—-:_.a�...,-•:.._/./....•�-/.r-R..f. ._,l.->•'.•..•.."a>�'`��vcti.�....-�r A._..i.''T..!.%:.,,•',.r.. ..`.�-,-1!........,1.i-..`a''+l•l.aa�•.i' .->tir..y,.N-'@5':w.,t_:...;•...',a.::.rl.h..:.".- .. .„._:,.r�-:.r'..°�.�r..•�:.i-.,�.l_�'",,I.,,.I',�:+M.Ir_-,,.F+�;t ri..!r.L..:l♦\X.'_.s'-'r•t.-ni,..�x�'....r•.�.+;(9..�„'�r.''-:,..;',/..IiFx:.�•.�•�-.::,.L v.9',•l..1.,•:'_•I'!. .. 'y,'.+t c.•-J`,.� '�...::fi•,,�-'-.'�..S�.. ',.....,.♦�..n._-. �.1 I.'i....;,,..-.!._y.�','..:_■.•,�.�"•..�.�1.�..,_It..'iL�1Y a�.,5:,.�...._'•".�.�•...Y....�a.',;�..-,..�-.,•,�-...::`o,,.."•-:..4R..;:.,.-.,:!�i":.1•�.(�..f/' ._,,r�":.„4'.w'�•..-.-Str...,>i-,:'.•yS,r/,..•1•..l..:�..'�.:.I'FF 1.c iI iI�f,.�1)I�.Ir1 l l:dJJIkI.I yy.',:;.,n.e.h ;,.r.-,.�!.,.,','..,'\.:.s wf-I.�:..:,-;'`;.r,.-'•I•;_,.,,.'''`.�,�I-.�I.^�t�III!r..'•�L,,�I_i-,.'I::,-1•.�I•'J��I'_4,1•I_'.'I..}'.-a',I1�''.,lIII�-.,.t ...•�I•, tvI-.:,r.9I1.,'i:•I7•.A);1..J! "{isI�I:...I_.l:_'�.hIrIT.-,I:.I�I...nI.h.r4 r•I�,.r.:�...I I..-'-•pItiI��I�u:.:,I.fl.I--,:•�'.IIII1I 1� l\ .IG♦ '�II•,4hII{-i•,:,II,I..II:• I)'g.'.(-p,d�.II i�IIOL:, .'4.�•..III...IIlIIIIIII..II0�I" IIIIIIe�t;.efI•..:II III,IIu1 II. I�YIICtlIwI.I1.II1I'�I.•II I!I(a1IqI�ILr.I.,t L�IIIIIIII,..''rIIi'1Ii I�.II6III•III1.;'I•�t I,IIIIIIIII�I•IIIIIl-I•I�I�IIIIIIIIrpI. .II�IIIII.III.�l'iL I�•III,I1I5I-.IaI II r1IIu,..II1,III:f,I1III.• •.lI1III7I1I)I!I� •II•tllI,u', .i 1IIIIIII.II•' Ji•'1,I'�iII.IIIIII I;_i'I.�II.I.�1IIIP r1.II.'I'•'.'I�I•IIII'�',IItIrI;I'�I�_•'IIII rIoII•+ �II1IrIIIII"IIlIt I..1.IINIII,fia.•,la�II.r l'IIIIIrIh c,IuIaf_I-r�II,`ILr I-lIIIi••I1 u,IIIx�uI.lI'•IIII,Ic'mf!II.I,lIL 'II,INiII•l:I InIIIt_l.�I III•IYII�III,I�. IItIIIIr�IN IIIIll,-'IIIlI _I I IlS1In• ViII"I•II,!I IIi_IInJwIIt'I IIIU•III:A I,I..L II^.�.!,I,,IIg,.a eIIIEIIIII TIlI IlII=�tIL(!III..IIIdIIJrIII.. I..I IIrL,J1 .-'II_III.4III.•N IIEI.�Il I•II.I!lI. 1 t tIiII-1IIlI I1I.IlI-•J1Ih1II_.IIY7II I1I 1III�IA'II V l•N,UIII.uVJ.l-I,Ir II.IIr:��1II.rl I- I-IrIIIII'.!I. �II III_uuI Ii4.„IIIIn'III�l(.II III,III•CT II�IIIIII'III�•I—"IIIIIII.IxII• IIhRII'I".I E IIII.M1,IyI II.!I.III.-IJnIIIlII..a'lIIIIIIIlII"a..L Iq,sII1IIIpI''I.: +IIIIII,II�"U.rm�NI,rIILrII1i,III IIIIIIl,INI1IC rIuI1II�IdII T IIVl,'-I.I�I.IIE°,.•'I.II-nIII III.I.I�IAII1•i• IIIlI'I•InI':.II-I.Iu�i �.IIIIiI�IlII IiIlII.I. ,III:'I.IIIr1�:I.I+I.I.•d!�IIIII•,III•�L� '.TI1IIIIIu-u-I.fNIIII Ll.1I.IIrI,I'r1IIInIILI'I�.'IIIIl:�1II''i.III'I,NiI,:lI u•III1I1IIr,rrI.I„I III?IIa,II-II I!,I l IIIu fI.:.':I�:u•TuI..IrI 4��'iIII�I,'Iu.U,aII_r;.'E aI.•ILN.rn.N lIIINIII.:.r:III. 'II''I1'IrII.rlIlII rtII:L:IJf_I:L'III:IuIII I'IIIII.II�'',,.I�u I'tIIIII•,I,SII� I•II�:I..I+r l0',LxEI.-IZIII.I,'••IIII'I-n �,IllIIIIIII r III-:rIII1IIIIT Il_IIII•II l.INI.Il VI,I,.rN'IIIO•N IIIrII.II ll1I1�IIIIIIIIII I.3I,i1PINI1.IIIt.IlIIaIIIhIuIr•:�I•II(..IIII.I.f IIIIrIIs'II�,II .LJIIiI,'III'L.IIN.Ir1:;�1iLIL.I„II.IL,II1.IIIr.III� I'II'IILlI1rrI'I'7 l I1I�.I1.III�l:n• I�LI1rIIIIlI; L lteIIIIlINI.III,I�IIiI.IIlI,'I l.rIIII..I I.IIJI.l-�:I v.IIIII.'I::•IIII.II.iL.�III+,aIII.IlIaI,! -1II•III nI:III,I.IIN1I:IlIIII.'I•f.lI IlIIIr.11 lll.IIr.I,I,I,IrI1f1uII. III IIIIILIlI:r'1'nIr,Id'nrI7 �Il:1 t III,IIIIII,I2� ,i1-I-�III,IlI'•iI IILII1III'I-idII ,I-III,iI:1 uIrIIr II1 IIlI"r1lII'IIII IIrII1nIIIIIII�II'�—NII, lII ILIIIIII. IlIII,rI1I.,IIr.dIIII'JII. i I.I•1I,dIII':III, LIII!I�IIIIIIIrI'I'I, I'!ClIIIII'r'I '.IhI/.IdI 1IIiIII,IIIII1,L.... tI_LL"Ii'iI.Z'II r I aI:116Il.L:1i.1 I►8.hIiIIII.I�I.If I:_,) lI1GIII,IIIII.ri.a Ir lIIIlIiIII"ll_9 lII.:(.lIId!Ipp',:.-Ih_1LIIII�•.II,.ITI_IlIIaIII�IIIJ'' .. Ca-IFI1�l,III1ZIl'IIU fII•I6IJ'1'l�.Ir'.,,T !.iIIrI.I•1:...II-:. IIIi_I•i, IIrI1IIII,' _II1IrhI�.,I,III,1I,ruIIdI.I„,I• IILIl.IIrIIo lI�.Lo• Ici.IIlII_. , 1fuI r�,'�I9 l N.IIU• I llI:. . I1'-tIIIL I•I.:FI_I,.I�rytl1IdIIlII•I�IT°sII II.!'IliII Nrytll-l�n.�IpI1�IIh.•:.I:l I�It.:N Y l I.pI�NNNxII1aIlI:Il 1'dI IIJ'.. ,IllI.('hI'II1IIIr„L IN�'1 I'III.�pi�II II II III'IrIr P 1°,IH�NsruI,IIIwIIJryI.1 IIII".I.I� 1 rINNNn:pHII.l^I6�I.l.�,.I,,Is-IIII..I�IIIisIIIu-I ilII•..nIII.I�I- q N�II,�7,IIlIhINN1 II : +.I!',.,..I•. t IIIl ; l•,"I'•IInII.r,: .�!lllInIII uy.I Il�l)+'�Q..,IlIl2Ir• u IpI,n it�I, uIILu,IdIIlrfi I :nI:II!l�.P�I.I1 rf I:I1IrxI.III i •��lpN�I:IIII� Ir It Ii pNI1I�l NwdIl �I q� IIil uII�xL•N f f� � ,IINII'IIw,I:', fIII IIIlY.'9 NI IfpqP� -L.I''GI•�N.,.I,Id.,'��E�NJII:IJ:IL•:..I:•lII'LILlz1r I I�I•1:�Ir.,IIrF.. I l �I:xgd.I,IN. l.!pI1II,I. I l � IN;I- l RCr " Fill I ! Ili IIII1I I l II „ .AS I0i II III p I milli rl II II IIII4 !IfI II II�FI:� 6III r �l I�1w- .ihNlIl, ...l.XJ.k��NNl1.iI„I„.I,u.•lL' �l �NrI'.�nIl .,, s -, U.I.1.lIIIL� :NIdlIIIII1 I. lIII.�II.• wN�I'IfII_.I lI I1I III.II;aL'rI NIpAr i III.lI INdlrt.:I�II.•lILL `IIIII�I uLI l 1.NI�I'II-dr,:I : �.�I..uSNlu.I,I'i�•I.. II�,Il III 'IIlI: ax.III N. `N'.. 2.III IN,iVoiI, ,Pa�II'•Ji 1III," IIIrI ,1I II�lIlI N NN'yIIIY1I .•IIJI' I I,III I.1r ,�_l.•c..,( : -F �i..•... S �1.�,••a ... F-,.•�,_ms:fI:�-I.:I1:�. ..,.._I•,�s�L � 11,r- 7), I.:•w... 'tIII:' , ^I I',•e ., C'•:. !.M1•-•.F ..L.-K:n,��I�.•_a..:.�r . �..�^. : — �C..: C...�•s,.,tF C.fl •N._a*.,�:e,�•I c.. , ...I..• „ ,•',Iw_.,4�:. yu Yar 'ti.i•,,;.t�,.>•- - :... .. n<ya ._ •a i— +,,..•.awk�." "_x41 I / !.;;N•1��,.•ti�,.•�..,, .Iw',JY._r• , . ..,. , - .!, 4Nv_d ��..�✓ • �L.I!i..Ht1, tlC r1 t r. u�xY�:•.:: .- . •-_,i�1•�'s..: :f G�6 rlII II'I. I III 1II1 's ... r�I . , _ _ . S! 4g? ,_P%•. ....s'; �.. ,..- -..: ••�� Jr N.1 , I'I ..:.. ......... .............. . ........ ... . . �G.:�.. ..LZ. �R E_ 7 - 4000 MORRISONa'::::GRAPHIC SCALE :•o ) Y . DIGHM .: ... :scr.N.,.l t94 FLWM- SRCE MAIE sn,• .:hai5e7m 7= W)MI-n.s .lt e jIN FEET ) REwSIoN DAM REN2/0 T l :irich. =. 4000ft. RAWN BY: W DAiE 0 /99 s ....'...• . .' CHECKED BY:..... .'. DRANING NO.: S AREA.DWO .. ..".. " .'..•. JOBNO.: 3130.001 0100310 ..• .,. • . . .. _ _ _ _ � � e� ,__ .. . . .� __ . .. I I rr r rr r r r� rr rr r r �w r �r r r r r r rc �/^.�(. sue{ '° 1 kf� l., J` -_3 [' 7' 't,. Fes-• :3 � '� p .. . ' . ANNExATioN �� 7 �. wit - � � • ' � � - � L.� - �� t 1 � /. EXI STING 1 , + _ R MAIN tL 1 ALIGNMEMf f.J L M - �v,_.�-- ram..^—. �-�.,r °'� ��' ....,. �-�..��• -=�-.--�-���.,.� - 11 _ X14 } 71 MD a�.e. Ll --- - --'= 'WA-MR-IV h �+ la:. U f - s � � r' c J sss 1 _ v tsr�1 T i F .�k cl -, WATER .3 rimSTR FALLON wm,t 1 'Sc k• tl'f 4F7 3 1 12 F ! v �� ��` �J�� 4� '-`. _. '.f ,�.FAL1a11r R1q._ •_.a>_`.wi: i i. �ru ILI V {t � . c � t � �� f ' ass �.eat r—• _ ---..,.r.... .:�.-..,-,.n_ j t 4 G� 5t I t 1 d'll\ �:� /1K1 7t i ry tt i--' :3 IGNME ram) IDAMA ERL t ��`Lt'l. � �� �' � t�. � my ��•+rr •gym �r.p�{a''�'f �+�� .c � 3130\EXHIBITS\F10PM 3.DWG F IG T TR F #6 � � � � r � � � � � � r a■� � � � � � r �: � � LEGEND L_J VALLEY WEST ��y4 I , ANNEXATION C� POTENTIAL TER MAIN ALIGNMENTS cc a 4 0 _ 1 1 z + W I : ,. QUlTD RD Iif S 51 Bf# L.�p jIgj 97. I tot' A9.1 rs BABCOCK RDWATE �,. fir► s UP r`rt 11 �iMr ij .. r; i �+ ®� W �--- - 1 i Fla 1 I� } ' All FALLON 8TR s �'�, 6 `� -� II HL1 ".` E LANE �{. � - .....R.l`..0 ..'JL_�. .+,•"s-,� __3-- _ ,.l _. _ -Yi _._. _ Y � ..�•..--.^-<•�"t :.-.�+....-.'" �'�-.-.�--.`��.n,..,�c,'L...r.�....��"""�....,�-;i''-- RIC ol 01 PLC— a - R MAIN WLA - ^ s IG VIE ALLEYNVE . ni- MAN . 1 _► ERL , c. ]IF �� +� t �" ��^ �'�, V [1♦`. rL � r 1....r sraj 1kM(Yr!»7P.;��M'�14 F z Lz a t—�;:_ .e.,.. 3130\EXHIBITS\F10PM 3.DWG FTC TT T R F, #7 .� , - . • • i I 1 VALLEY WEST SANITARY SEWER TRUNK MAIN BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK PUD ----- - -- -- -- -- -- 11211 2h I 1 I� 18" 18" 1 I I I I I I I I 18" 1 - 1 18 (13 I f LEGEND: 1 112" ;II ®®_I 8" TRUNK LINE —— ': Ili 10" TRUNK LINE — — — 1 12" TRUNK LINE �.I I! 18" TRUNK LINE ••— r 21 " TRUNK LINE 1 _ I 10" 1 41 1 I 18 GRAPHIC SCALE Coo 1 1 I PROJECT I 1000M ) 1+I I 1 inch- AREA ' --- 81, MORRISON SURMIM MAIERLE,INC. SHRAWERS 1 ,ft 3ft*&"-ow"d cbmpm, ru Bx 1113 901 To*4bV eAd. &awak 19 59771.Rat(roe)5V-0711 Fa(roe)687-1176 3130.001 EXHIBITS FlGB.DWO i 1 'I • `n I I / z, I I I M=N��o too o' I I 1 Obi >z i�`azS I I I � EXISTING 5�' CM 01 z I i / 20t U yam,$oi n osW 1 1 }00 OO__ I too go I I i I i 9 1229.24' d—' / I ! 18+00 It w It I� I II N = LOT #8 = LOT #7ci eL si a o II � zK DETENT, POND / v i I _ = 1 21'x21x1.5 DISCHARGE END O �� I I / SIDE SLOPES �1 �� / 171 LOT #1 DETEN 0 POND 1 � DETENTION POND DI io 21'x21'x .5' O OISCHAFR9&y,F ' 8'x350'x1.5' O DIS HARGE ENO i 4 SLO S 2:1 v SIDE SLOPES 2:1 I I ' " $` o 16-E I aDa 28 LF 1 RCP bo SLOPE W 4 'x t' �� ' 229 LF 1 RCP QAR SLOPE 13 12' RCP-2 R < SDP ,5+ a O U < O .50 OPE=1 R v .. i + ... .: ... _1..._._._....._�. ._�... C O 1 - 120 lF 1 ' RCP SLOPE=2. I :c—•;DETENTION POND 6' VALLEY CUTT�R _ 23'x23'xt.5' O ISCHARCE END I LOT #4 I // Z SLOPES .t + LOT #S I IZ LOT #3 l LOT # ' W W LOT #6 I / Z N / a m a Of RELEASE STRU II DETENTION POND _ - I ,_ �— / I I w O I— LLJ 20'x20'x1.5' O OISCHA = ENO ETENTION POND I ENTION POND o h Q j SIDLj E SLOPES 2:1 i' 2 'x20'xt.%' O DISCHAR c END I ' 2 'x24'xt.5' O DISCHARGE NO DETENTION PONp m --" 510 SLOPES 2:1 I I St SLOPES 2:1 8'x70'x1.5' O DI CHARGE END cn SIDE SLOPES 2: (� 1 3 / 15' RC CULVERT w/FETS CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE WALE Q I m 0-INFORCE DRAINAGE SW LE SLOPE 1.5% SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET , CY RIPRAP _ a I „ F- 2.3' GRAPHIC SCALE MATERIAL —I PROJECT NO. '0 '0 FROM SWALE 1.5' n EXCAVATICN 30.001 O!0 ono �1 (N OR W SHEET NUMBER ( IN FEET) OF SWALE) 1 I..h 1 50 ft DRAWING NUMBER (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL FIGURE#9 • • i ` • i I i V1 1 \^rn,T� 4, � W W !!Ii1iY, ry44Y 1 j 1;'!, 'y4Y1 LI�,,�1 li 11,1'hr,K,h I,y Y� !;1�,'111 11111 L 1r'1 1 h,ll;ll!IIL'• '.Xj4�pi'�3 1:1'�•''!111ih!li`41'4- �I"1,��1 11,4':. yyyy L ; h 4 v l :: '1'4ii;lhdl!,Yhy•r,'M1"Ivyi4'k,;:'Ir�'',!4hi�11�! 4Jr tiy!;I'Y�11�d4 Y!Iy'y!v IY'.�1� V, �v; 1�h,A 1 L�. 'Mr,' ''p1 �1. ...:r •°.1''i..: : Y4KK,44��, Lf{ �',''44•;h'"'I. �4 K� �r ,,1 h1yYY'4.1^I... "ti'K M1h 1!q _ '+' ;Y;,,4 51,,'4 "kK,41M1 titi,.!a•,1t'''`I,,YKh�' 14,,1,,,,,,,'K,1,yty;;`4h,,;...'K,,y:4,�,414 r ,4 v q,y,� .,Ay 4:qY'I y, v'41"11'4v 1y� 44" v';11"14141�INI'4 •11 Y',44 "1'4 '4 h�v�. ''h r,,v, .. 1 13 cl� �Vy�4�'h,;,l!Ip;g'hyKa'W,ih,k,!ly!;�4'14!'ti°p!1,1 Y,'14y41i1:1'gl'Jli!'Inly''91A'!M''L4J ,1 �r"M1Y!L, h'yY"4;Ir�aY14 W W y4 ,i d L h 414, K.h yr e '�h4ghh� v„M1 r1 �h�"1�"47'4'°4\�Y,4,4 1 L L"';�r,,�"'`u'"•. ® w "�y,4'i r"V�.! W m •'Ikrl• M'I;h'n '�ihi 'I;�,1'y. r"r4' K'"Ipp ',i411, ,,,''',,v1 r '4 'I;:v,,, pp,,I,pM1' r yy,, AI,;44,,h 44,1pd ,11Y Kh, ,1,I. 11.1,9N 1,4,'II�!i;,, r•41,K II '9 a W ^�Pn' 4:rg4r44V 4�„11,1,y�'I,h,1y yr1,1.1h1 ,hh4 '14 r'4 ,16'` k IIIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIII�III1�III'�III'��II�!��I���fI4^pII' �II��I���I�E�III��IIIIIIIIIII�I1'1 �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��I�I����I����II���I����II�IY11' � ,+IK41,;y u'v4 ;444 4'. 4,•rll;4�y,, �1,111,,6 4•,u 4 r4 w.4" '` r�!hy,;h�.l. WWWWV WW!P� �y� WWI g{a� V11.1 44'r. 4'Y4.1 L, 14 h Ie aa.Y,i •�!!^" i 6',�i d!i11 dK 1°hY'''h,41�r V r M1 r•,4 4 v r 4,',;"11,h 4•. 11 r! ,�4'K''K41, 414h1'4'�4 v"'1�1�, 4,wp'h Yy''y1'1 ,4y41 hp 4h'i�Ix I :. 4hlw ..11ip.'�� :,%i' 'dIJ";'•41,�1,yu 44,11Knv v'i;�,41'';�r''r �4',144h'1'' :M1j 1,Y gYn,l 1,; �'111;411i1 ni"111'!'1'hv •,14�IK1.1,41114 LIIh,Y ,"y`hll li,h, � 'gy 31 m .111�'y'LI"1'' ,ry�,•�µh' ;y 11,11. I, I'"11 3�fl�! m ? �II!IIIIIIII�I �'!Yi11',I1 h'Y'•",YI4' YIYivP;4kk4'ii1"i. ' 1''4 7'.4 �i ,y ,,M 90i1. �a cl �I �I!I'���!,4 'I I k !r h"�1',4,!;'•r h ''��" ''!,y'y:!Iry"'1' �� y V''�!:'1 �.�KK KK1YI�v''I ikh IK I A,1. 1 ® e'y1 yl,h, �ir4�."e4 1, 1� ,pv •h WWWIWI c: I �11h!4 1,a l iN1, I„ a ,•1�"1,11 h,l 1 -- :!Khn 4y ',h i iC h, K11�' r4 ti ci ,h h''1i'!;r'h kk 4', r r4'i;!{I•'li,, o W .Nilh'a'''4`�a''i' a' „'hrh1K, 'K 1 m •r "'9yhn. X4,Ia,i,4�a '41,:;N� •1p IyK,'h�u4,v �1'r ,L,ry dyK'11 11 r 1,;51 �p +IM1 11 J� II 1141.'1.: 11K 14:x�xw��W 1 v4n' I r�,;1 H,v;l •�„ �I 1'h 4K •17,1 1K 1 r4�4F': 14'I r4 l q-: ,3 Fy - 6'1! J'!1i h•,h{!!' N it M a4•; ,4 •� ! 41 k •'Y Ih I '.,Ih� h 'TI,d4 r 1,'h',r 4'Y Lh,�:.1,•1 IIV 1 h , �a N v'4'•1 I'1 41 r 1.1� •Iv'114 1 41 1i a I r'F'�K ',4 {p{{��• Wy I Lh'h•v4KiI 1 h,4•,4Y 1 4.11 11Y'4111::�1 • ,144 r 4., 41 r1i'Y.1' 1 I 11'411, I'Y: !'t'r J ,I 4.4 •A 4, 4yY r'11I, Ih4 hlI 1, r1,G'•!'",111 � K'r 11yy h n. i 4•v.1, h4"144':h 1 4,,y•1 , �',;1,,,41 Y4,144h 11 J 1,h11 h 4,1 Y1V 1 4 Y•I•''", K''.I 1',4YV IY 1 I t!t iO�S '4Y4' 1 I h h y 4 L Y 1 y K 14 1 II^if''• rJI,Vh Ih11"!Y h,4 a.. �I '1 ti K'J "1• 'Y'1 ''h l y..1 11h1ti'L'r'yY• I al Y"K 44 h 1K 1K "y h',•r 4Y� 114',^h4 ?I �I 4'1'a•, ',,4y, ,a, K 61 q 41.�: • fro 44',. Y W I•hl, `1 y�l�l� •I...r.. �'h1 r 4"''d1 1'i11'li 4 1 1 1, 4 1 'A41'y , 1,11J I 1K111 Kv 4'• h y1v 1I I L9 �. N ndNh 11 Y 11 Y•I'1 'd' I Y k'. 1 Y •, 1 1 5 pp 4' k, h1 �,Yh+Pv •, 1 4,,4r 1 h 1K 41141 1Y 41,9h'Ih 14 hll'h 1 .D 1�I 1 1 1 1 1Y 1LV I. 1 1•4 1 ',1 1 I L'4 YI,11', I,I,L 1,1 1' '�'�1 K h 1 IJ I dl ,Ih, y 44•Ih 1, ,1 ,1•f II s '�Y 111'h'Y h' I 1 W'•;h'•1 4 11 !1I I , 1,111 I ,1'Y41I 11 1 I 11 1 .I, 11 1 hY 41'1''!1 1441: ':11' I.1 I 11 11'I1 ,�F1 1hY h'!' ,4114Y, 11i''14'•'k'Y1 '' R 1 1 hh 4vr YIh 1 1'14 1 I 1h ,4 �!K11 u 4 I,u I s"1•'!' 1 Y411 1 hr1,1 1 k4611 r i K i 1 •1. 1✓ .Y L 111w'1',41�1 k 11'!4 J 3 vY'1 �•4 I,114'Y,dly „h i•1 ,.Ih 'K' 11 4' 4 9•.YY4 4 I I '•A'4 •'Y. Y•1 I.. .Y4. j�p��py�E�, i •N 4.1 y y I q y'11 1 1le '' 14,4�'YI '1h'd!h•141,,,4Y1".1 h''1k111, hr iK 1 111h, ...N1 1 111h4, 44 ,411� 4!'141'` 1' 11 h 1Y •11111i'! I '4' 1 Y41,Y4111 41 •' 11,,� .�:1' �•�IVI 1',1,11 'Y JI'•i'I' IliY:ly 111,11111.f. ;1•A 11 :1111 L1411'111,v11 ';1'11, I 4 1 14r ',144 1 I I ,1: I d, ,1 �!.v I•Y'1 Y'I114'4'�!4',I V i may, 1 1,11 1 ,1 I 1 I�I A11,1 I 1 , •VI,KI 11, 1 I , 1 I Y11 ^�s W I.I ! 41 h1'1 E1rI I 1 1 1h R Y,1 ,ri1 I11 Yh1 , .II .. v1,11 1 V •i Y'4.W..1. :s'. 11 I. 'In;4 , ,.,I, 1 � 1'4•I 1 4 4 1 , 1,14. li ,11 1, I I 1 1, 1, rlr,r^, IITII,II,II 1 i �w .�1111 41 11Ykm'1 1111 „ 41 1,1 :I ,11 1 4 7,h II�'I�''. „11,1�4h,1 1 111 1..1 1 1 4 ,1 I: J MY• 11 I. ,f1,41, 1 4 „ .1„ .: •IU, MINI .. 11 1�1 p x. ]]1 4 I„ 1'N 111a'4 LI '! 11 ,1, > 1 W1q 4'1 Y•�14 .......... .: 1 hh ,�'III''�1If� „IK,1 4 . ,•,,14 ,1,4 ,h h.l,� ,,,I iM1911,I,4,h 1��,1,1J, 1IItlIIIIItlIIIIIIII II114h .1,n1,p 111 ,h" I1,: 6 a1,Kj 1, a :.,.i 1,yY, :1 .: I,hl .4v1 ,a1 ^II 1,1 ;',!1: :111'14'4'�,!, ,4"' I!114 v 14 A�;1f.h,hi41 h ,I 'Ili,41 h',q:,1 h'11 +tn ',uv��h '4 JI 11,n„q 1 ,JI I,4 a•1 L,. :,Y;,4 ..L r I p4.1444J1u1 41r::4IrtiW,lli'i1;"I'11 Y4 I;JI I,A 4',41, k 1,4•: F1W. 4� I�u.•41 Iha'hvh 1v 4!. ,yy'I��IIIII�IIIIf��IIII1�II��'�III'II�IiIIII!II'p'II 1�II�I��II�IIIIfIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIII�'IIII'IIII�IIIIII11'1aI �I�pI! 1�4114�e_�1 ..v4•,1411 I , ',4 14 1 4 11,h,11,vY'4 I v4 I vl v4 Ih'4• _. u4 - c :1>:�W`WW:1.1,,},II�' 4 1;1q':4 ,1;I WWIW � WWYWU' ® d,;I J,'!,4f!,t','1 k '1 h'9h4�,!1 li 11Y;h4�Ap 'h•14' 4hi, i 'y� -q I ,! titi ;I 1'1y,h 1,1,fp4�I 'r!d 411i;w•�'!..ly ,1444w$151hh k41;!'"kl4,Y;'a. ��hiy111"M�.-r C•; Iv�Y,41 ,,;'c,, ,;I,Mp,4i,;¢!^'�• I�Y 1,,1,'h`i "�1!: :44'y1;;;hi}?;'lyr!P'I .�'4;ydi,pv.k 1;�'1�1;4 ',4,L!4,1'1:,,v r1,14y 1.'. Y li duo,, '1i'u i•Ih'ai r'4K.y h'v 1 v 11,Yy I:y gr,Y,14.1 11,!: ::,I},i'ti h411 iir�v „v;i 14,1,T,11 Y1,41 Y61.iLY,,'p144411'.41 ,;' 1,1,hiAh+' R`R 1;y4111•;44411 ,v 1';4y1i' I,,.!11'111!Yf!1'p)� II :•1,11,v 4„ }}q Y4rlw,Yl,lkl•,11;,p,1141,1�11 Y1. ,1114h i1,a 11441, it dll'1}!Ihlliall ll'1,jY'A 1111Y1,I I'ry1 ;11!II:.11 h1,1 I 111,4. !'�1 1,n„ h, I,�IjY,l 1J,:,1,441 11,1hh61141,11' 1 1411114 VII'4,I,'JI � Ih11,4hh Yy 1,;I,Y,,,y 111 4 1yY Y,II V4 ;tii' '1�41h�. 11Y .iyi;lll,i�l44 w,,IY''411,1y1,!1,11y1y1h7,!,'IIIJv'h1,u,'y',u yI, 'rAhplh'd4'41'I'dh"Iy4 �'ik h4il?,F,:,!�1Y,!,,!1'd41Y''' ,'i4' 1''7,41•, '„� 1 ' !!Iii kp y11 '•!i'I 1�y,id;4'4"Nh!yI.4'4'd!.Y'11y:!;;4'?4i"''.C ,LJ,,,, ,"II hi+4.u'NY;uI 1 val'' du!4 tiP h'Y�..Y v4:,y'I:4'I;'�' LA4'dWJp 4'';4 '!;4! :4v;u;.Ai 'I. •_ ,I,,.�14�yf,vll,r h M,4,Y¢eY,h 1146;!!!�h 1,11 k,v1 d1i•Ip, 44!Iq'4, ,•1p fp ,.Y gi'�44!441'''Y,' 4Vh4y�!' �f;!Iy•r 'I''! h_\!44441'!'hh'h1:14'`141,i I::6�4 1 YI'1N h r4 v vy 4.4 Y144 h. Jf4 1 �'3. 4'A' '1111I I!'4,f',u:, ,1 1,i;�4�� h y. 14'�',11iii11;1 ib�N4: �,1Y1 1Ih,Y141yY,li,!';h'1,',yllllh,i i!i' I"d�11'1'i"!II'1i'ill'4,!114i'i4',,dl '4''41M1i, d 'I;4!I,II1y'' u.1, 1''I','i;�l' }II'Ih;l'1,,,,�1;,y dh 1'vh.L.WeLWel4!',h li vh 11,v4'IJ 6v44.4k:14h,41, 1,y1 y;f;!'n Cln \'1 Y1�1'"I'''M;'1'1�''11d;6 ii' rhl:� ,,y l,u L`!!I 1,41 vh,�al,•, -J,ypyl I!'1i91h1•prnl,;n,n;n+1 W.1dy,Y1 o'Af' I�y�..w•4f'hli'I;'lllhd'a"I;d41;I'�'1"I;ily� i!!ij�l!!'•, '"ra�4.lui,Y,1�!�u,.v.ltWy,lr'?,I{y,hj`'fl�y',4,a4,j,: � e1 vli;;;li1vV'.�''i,uN�;!!�J4'ly�•''�Yr!J,�OyJL` rYhl', ",,11'4,rhi!;!9 hl" 4ry!,!:,!III�,IY 1!J !c1}'+4.� 4k,'y,.L.u!Lu. 11; ' rl I1 4 , 1 h r 4 4 C!C14'6.P¢L.1'ILB:uuy. 1 ?'LW4iljii��u.'i!1�K y K'1 1,1, 1 �1f1 , r•,r1Y'•i''I I 1 i11' 1Y;'i4W'• Y,14,1y41r 1 by .h.., © 'I.va,.r n 1�Y ,,. ,. , :. .1: .. ... : - : << .t.t. " r .. .. .>.:., ..... ...,13ii... I,i:. G:.,�li.ii.. .Ii!ii.. ..� I. .:.ir, hr!n,:. n ...• ....,:.... :: 1 I K 1 K 1 J'IS !!!S.uY, an!P!.: C.,.! i i .,...Iw. ,. : ..: !!.,:t.....i t .. ..!t,,a d!.I I ,I!YI 11 J „11':p11 hi 111114:11, I�k:�h,IF111 111:LIV 1h1,h11 CI® � V !.,,S,IWW.,,.,,JW:.:.,.CiWJ.,Vi3!1L!G!n U:.l,d!313UIU41W,U1.1 tJ wM1tUU U611�t.W'iiC!Gk1313133i:3mW;CC!WCI W1313!3!3C!U!WW:3 i!!!3!JPi 3'.61 U:!!!3 rnm. • . nm: 41 i�yi;4!4j1;i�,~1'!a1i iti!;i'�y y1y!?i�4!!il"""";y�,i;�;w!!1i4'44i4'�4?•�y�G1k�;n1;r,54,'y;';;I`"Y'y;4;;u!!14'pijd;ljjiy; 1.. ®_ 71 1 "Iy,,,�!!y4�,!,41ji;i7,ry l;i;iWr�l!,I:!yY;i'41;''!1i1;''i;ii�''4'li'yi'1i''!ti!!!i�';111''itii!1j;4wti!iil•kh!i(•i'11!!ii1i4,4,!Aliyi!y!�I ,! lyy4y;i4!,k;'4 I Yp;'1 ti;'Ihlj,j41'�` j;ly 44 4 14!P411111`I:1!'iijy4l!li Ii I!1 Y4'y;,;,,.. .!ltii, Lj!!i4!i,,lb4hl:h,4'111,1h,1h11'Y;1111;Lhj dylyl,rlly!,!v'!11'4hl•!!4',4�';!'i1i1444,44 _`�'VneS Cti3J..^^ •PPP!mmWm® �. � . I .F4111 1Y�Y 4Y 1,11'1•, ,1Y,he.1l... �����l�,��,�� ..!m Wr!!. !!W�:•!u:n!Grn^,:�r!GGrI,:...n rr:nn :45 11, Ivl IYY I 111 ,1111.11, ,Iii4133PW 3!4 n 4.mlt, 1,It it„ 1,'315m,W, .mfl. - :4, 1 I, , 1 1 „11:11!41Y11 :•.... • • • . .r.i G...i§� .31!:[:![,!8W3<31i!1131C[3!!ICiWCi!nm mlP!PWWiJ!JI:!1. .!3 Uii!119.ritJ;j!LYI'i!%f:!F!!AFJ,Li!Fi!!i!:I CIA,J::r!i:i!:!^:i,^'^�:!Ni:i:: YY,v,,!14p,1yy1'y'!;I'Dui,',Ih1i'I'�!li'1'd'yil4!!!i141'I.1. . WWWWIIIWWW�I�umuloP®!uuuu® '' o '�" l$( :. � ,„.. .!......r...WIn!,.,,.:.4.a. .. .mla!aC!n•PI3::.!•W:n!:nm! ��I'1 1 h 41 v 1,1•' Wm�1lPPuf1 I�������upi I�����I�u�m�p� !, ''4�� t 1 alml �� • YIW Imy .... ���Ii!�,�41d j1 �, tlj�!i;lill j5'N'j1p1, Y1h4,�4��'� I��' 111'r{I II .W{IWWIY r 'h1'!a4F '1!. 8 Ip�ppry�pp ,��1���F��pry� _ 344 Y•1,,!ryp'I hP.'a' .��9G' CA_ • � a �j _ jlll�l;o'I iN;...fff,...... i � -� •h`� .5p$�`. �B�_ I I I���� I � I _ I 0�� [I 1. j'h'.:;4�li, �V� !� ��Q�p '!OfWQYV ,: �1: .1 a .t �. ('�: �� I �NO D• 1 :�. � �� Y:�Il � � yid'� "4'Iti�1'4f:1 999p999prmPr,'/'p,��++y(Igrtg! ! p. � 9V I :�. :� . -�.,�➢8� ! 8 I�1��j I`y7 I ;�yi�! a!ie6• ^4�udQy � �� 9•�ed°� I j •� , � II �lp9� a;il 4„y,;.,4 rill,I Ill Hill i i 111,,•111 il':::n,,1:, HIMI i. Am - -•_- • 411411h it llq lu h I�iilla411111�IIWu1� _ •.-. ` , - mw`= _ h wo CITY OF BOZEMAN AREA. STREAM MAP . ( ;E lAJ CIO mg r ` x �K �G wdw. .� �RN•���w.,„r�. zw i ' 4 d F i Y w 4 4 ice.:J31CG w� ?�l7dF i :. xd r rhpr( iKJq jt Mil.m. - ... .. .. ... ... '.. .. .. . .. : ... lax.'nx"'G 4�r aGd:J•G �i''. C"�""�a�� .. .... ..... .. ... ... - , 22 Ia aY, ""ars aG�,,dy 1aa '1l ,j �Gk G u x " r� 'GRAPHIC SCALE ! w JCJHLLION. aoo" 0 200 400 soo liG aG d Y, Y� J1�I,hY' AUT .PLAZA ... .... .. : .. s A 1 �dd �YxdAa� �.I^atGG .. M 911 .. � 4�r �nM ( 'IN. FEET ) . I inch 4.00: B . . AXTER, CREE pax t a " r . BUSINESS' PARK .�x: (Wxe HUFF.INE LANE ggMMd a x "� 4 k add Gh 's �.. �F. �CwG.S ..aa,aa d _ . " . *ZLw . FIGURE #1 " .,. E4 BVCBEFRS IN .... .... :' :: .- .:: : (i>, IIdGY' J .. ixG q 1' •'�Gr h .. ... �� MORRISON: SU . a 44 I JJ C RLE,: N INS . GG .. .. N .. 901 ishcbq B'ri B IB.3T711.Hlanz 10e)11QJtl�'F=(40)50-1179 GGr ..... ... .. ... .. ::. ,d ... .. eel� G � .. t REVI�ON DATE .. . P.0.Bat IiD I.N REV1 ON • C 1 '.A'unx DRANK BY:KW GATE:02/Ot/99 fag .. .. CHECKED BY: .. ... DRAYANO NO.: 11ETAREA.D .. ...... .. ...... .. J08 NO.d30 31 .001 O10 0310 ... SHEET*rl1 OF 1 ... ' V �1 �.il 11J1� 0M0• L)4dOl_\S1181HX3\0£l£ xv r of Bill Ts 4!mN Mi.Wi,vi iM rAe AR imEd ALA KMO7F;M1Wm W AR 7T ET mWS SF LLZx yk toot _'&�:,�.,�,,,-•fir ��f�- _���,-•"� _ >�_� s- a;= L:__ 111TJr1 1, 1p ar s ":� 4"d ° ` gy � = 1LY -`o37i �;•__.__ ---. � - _ _ ;�,�� shy' -- t _ � I � ��- v - -ate �i s - - - — - i; } flu t e£i� �f ,f a9 `' = r. s - �i,= .'Li- � _ q� Y _ .� III WAY Y � Stec - - - R t �_ -_ _ � -_ R� t F AM - _ - 717171 � _r " �- t - -_ R, _ _ _-- Y Rs - _'i-' _ _ _ �f. sigg Gus n a _� - �C- �' � � �:NO 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX II ' WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ' CALCULATIONS AND EXHIBIT r t Extended Description: PEAK DEMAND FOR BAXTER CREEK AND PEAK DEMAND PREDICTED FOR THE VALLEY WEST DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT FIRE FLOW. (THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PROPOSED 12" WATER MAIN ACROSS BAC- WEST PROPERTY.) UNITS SPECIFIED ' FLOWRATE ............ = gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) .......... = feet PRESSURE ............ =psig OUTPUT OPTION DATA ' OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION 1 NUMBER OF PIPES ...................(p) = 29 ' NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES ..........0) = 25 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ...........(1) = 3 NUMBER OF BOUNDARY NODES ..........(f) = 2 ' NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ............(z) = I SIMULATION RESULTS *** WARNING *** A PORTION OF THE SYSTEM IS DISCONNECTED FROM A BND BY CLOSED ' LINES **** A FIX WILL BE ATTEMPTED 1 - THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES ARE DISCONNECTED FROM THE SYSTEM ' DEMANDS AT THESE JUNCTION NODES ARE SET TO ZERO: 10 50 60 ' PIPE NO. 10 HAS BEEN OPENED TO REMOVE DISCONNECTION *** WARNING *** ' A PORTION OF THE SYSTEM IS DISCONNECTED FROM A BND BY CLOSED LINES A FIX WILL BE ATTEMPTED THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES ARE DISCONNECTED FROM THE SYSTEM DEMANDS AT THESE JUNCTION NODES ARE SET TO ZERO: 10 50 60 PIPE NO. 10 HAS BEEN OPENED TO REMOVE DISCONNECTION ' *** WARNING *** A PORTION OF THE SYSTEM IS DISCONNECTED FROM A BND BY CLOSED ' LINES **** A FIX WILL BE ATTEMPTED ' THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES ARE DISCONNECTED FROM THE SYSTEM DEMANDS AT THESE JUNCTION NODES ARE SET TO ZERO: 10 50 60 ' IP N P E O. 10 HAS BEEN OPENED TO REMOVE DISCONNECTION *** WARNING *** A PORTION OF THE SYSTEM IS DISCONNECTED FROM A BND BY CLOSED LINES *** A FIX WILL BE ATTEMPTED THE FOLLOWING JUNCTION NODES ARE DISCONNECTED FROM THE SYSTEM ' DEMANDS AT THESE JUNCTION NODES ARE SET TO ZERO: 10 50 60 ' PIPE NO. 10 HAS BEEN OPENED TO REMOVE DISCON\TECTION ' The results are obtained after 17 trials with an accuracy = 0.000 12 The regulating valves required 2 adjustments. SIMULATION DESCRIPTION CyberNet Version 2.18. Copyright 1991,92 Haestad Methods Inc. Run Description: Basic Network Drawing: BAX-2 1 0 ' PIPELINE RESULTS ' STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE BN -BOUNDARY NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK ' PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ No. 91 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10-BNPU 0 10 259.54 0.39 319.73 0.00 0.74 0.34 20 10 50 259.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.34 50 50 60 259.54 0.03 0.00 0.06 1.66 2.44 60-RV 60 70 259.54 0.03 0.00 0.06 1.66 2.44 ' 70 20 70 -259.54 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.34 80-XXCV 70 50 120-BNPU 0 110 1754.80 6.79 188.00 0.19 4.98 11.68 130 110 100 1250.46 14.19 0.00 0.10 3.55 6.24 140 20 120 259.54 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.34 150 120 130 123.64 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.09 160 130 140 -30.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.01 170 140 150 -296.14 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.84 0.43 ' 180 150 270 -480.36 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.06 220 100 190 770.10 0.89 0.00 0.04 2.18 2..54 230 190 200 582.86 0.65 0.00 0.02 1.65 1.52 ' 240 200 210 359.38 0.52 0.00 0.01 1.02 0.62 250 210 180 178.41 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.17 260 180 220 178.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.17 ' 280 100 240 480.36 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.06 290 240 250 480.36 0.08 0.00 0.22 3.07 7.64 300-RV 250 260 480.36 0.07 0.00 0.22 3.07 7.64 ' 310-XXCV 260 240 320 260 270 480.36 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.06 350 210 280 51.11 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.49 ' - 360 280 290 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 390 310 220 -105.70 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.06 ' 400 220 320 54.59 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.14 410 320 280 54.59 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.35. 0.14 JUNCTION NODE RESULTS ' JNCTN NCTN EXTERNAL HYDRLC JNCTN PRESSURE JNCTN No. TITLE DEMAND GRADE EL. HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft} (ft} (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 5074.34 4750.00 324.34 140.55 20-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 4899.14 4748.00 151.14 65.49 50-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 5074.34 4750.00 324.34 140.55 60-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 5074.24 4750.00 324.24 140.50 70-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 4899.91 4750.00 149.91 64.96 100-1 COTTONWOOD & 0.00 4949.73 4778.00 171.73 74.42 110-1 WEST BABCOCK 504.34 4964.02 4782.00 182.02 78.87 ' 120-1 COTTONWOOD R 135.90 4898.94 4751.00 147.94 64.11 130-1 COTTONWOOD R 154.02 4898.91 4758.00 140.91 -61.06 140-1 COTTONWOOD R 265.76 4898.91 4765.00 133.91 58.03 ' 150-1 COTTONWOOD R 184.22 4899.19 4770.00 129.19 55.98 180-1 FALLON STREE 0.00 4947.53 4806.00 141.53 61.33 190-1 COTTONWOOD R 187.24 4948.80 4782.00 166.80 72.28 ' 200-1 COTTONWOOD R 223.48 4948.13 4788.00 160.13 69.39 210-1 COTTONWOOD R 129.86 4947.60 4800.00 147.60 63.96 ' 220-1 COTTONWOOD R 18.12 4947.50 4808.00 139.50 60.45 240-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 4949.72 4778.00 171.72 74.41 250-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 4949.43 4778.00 171.43 74.29 ' 260-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 4899.71 4778.00 121.71 52.74 270-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 4899.70 4776.00 123.70 53.60 280-1 J.C.BILLION 105.70 4947.42 4797.00 150.42 65.18 ' 290-1 BAXTER CREEK 0.00 4947.42 4792.00 155.42 67.35 300-1 BAXTER CREEK 0.00 4947.42 4804.00 143.42 62.15 310-1 BAXTER CREEK 105.70 4947.48 4812.00 135.48 58.71 320-1 J.C.BILLION 0.00 4947.46 4804.00 143.46 62.16 REGULATING VALVE REPORT ' VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW ' (ft or gpm) (ft) (ft) (gpm) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' PRV-1 60 60 4900.00 THROTTLED 5074.24 4899.91 259.54 PRV-1 250 300 4900.00 THROTTLED 4949.43 4899.71 480.36 1 SUMMARY OF INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM BOUNDARY NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO BOUNDARY NODES ' PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) - -------------- 10 259.54 120 1754.80 NET SYSTEM INFLOW 2014.34 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW= 0.00 i NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 2014.34 **** CYBERNET SIMULATION COMPLETED DATE: 9/22/1998 TIME: 14:28:13 � w w Description: BAXTER CREEK PEAK DEMAND AND FIRE FLOW WITH PREDICTED ' PEAK DEMAND FOR THE VALLEY WEST DEVELOPMENT. (THIS SUMMARY DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PROPOSED 12" WATER MAIN ACROSS BAC-WEST PROPERTY.) Drawing: C:\BAX-2 Fire Flow Summary. Page 1 ' JCT Peak Hour Peak Hour Zone Needed Available @Residual Min. Zone @JCT No. Demand Pressure No. Fire Flow Fire Flow Pressure Pressure No. (gpm) (psi) (apm) (gpm) (psi) (psi) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 10 250.7 140.5 1 1750.7 2000.0 60.4 34.7 310 20 0.0 65.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 52.0 26.2 310 50 0.0 140.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 60.4 34.7 310 1 60 0.0 140.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 58.1 34.7 310 70 0.0 65.0 1 1500.0 2000.0 58.2 32.7 310 100 0.0 74.4 1 1500.0 1812.3 35.7 20.0 310 ' 110 504.3 78.9 1 2004.3 1981.0* 34.0 20.0 310 120 135.9 64.1 1 1635.9 2000.0 48.1 23.6 310 130 154.0 61.1 1 1654.0 2000.0 43.9 22.5 310 ' 140 265.8 58.0 1 1765.8 2000.0 39.1 20.6 310 150 184.2 56.0 1 1684.2 1933.8 3 7.1 20.0 310 180 0.0 61.3 1 1500.0 1252.8* 22.6 20.0 310 ' 190 187.2 72.3 1 1687.2 1640.1* 33.6 20.0 310 200 223.5 69.4 1 1723.5 1489.9* 30.7 20.0 310 210 129.9 64.0 1 1629.9 1300.3* 25.2 20.0 310 220 18.1 60.4 1 1518.1 1231.9* 21.7 20.0 310 240 0.0 74.4 1 1500.0 1813.5 35.7 20.0 310 ' 250 0.0 74.3 1 1500.0 18 13.5 J.) 20.0 310 260 0.0 52.7 1 1500.0 1864.0 34.6 20.0 310 270 0.0 53.6 1 1500.0 1865.3 35.4 20.0 310 280 105.7 65.2 1 1605.7 1196.9* 23.0 20.0 300 290 0.0 67.3 1 1500.0 907.3* 25.2 20.0 300 ' 300 0.0 62.1 1 1500.0 754.3* 20.0 30.0 310 310 105.7 58.7 . 1 1605.7 1192.1* 20.0 22.7 220 320 0.0 62.2 1 1500.0 1249.2* 20.1 20.0 310 Extended Description: PEAK DEMAND FOR BAXTER CREEK AND PEAK DEMAND PREDICTED FOR THE VALLEY WEST DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT FIRE FLOW UNITS SPECIFIED FLOWRATE ............ = gallons/minute ' HEAD (HGL) .......... = feet PRESSURE ............ = psig ' OUTPUT OPTION DATA OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT SYSTEM CONFIGURATION NUMBER OF PIPES ...................(p) = 31 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES ..........0) = 26 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ...........(1) = 3 NUMBER OF BOUNDARY NODES ..........(f) = 3 NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ............(z) = 1 SIMULATION RESULTS ' The results are obtained after 11 trials with an accuracy = 0.00043 The regulating valves required 1 adjustments. ' SIMULATION DESCRIPTION CyberNet Version 2.18. Copyright 1991,92 Haestad Methods Inc. Run Description: Basic Network Drawing: BAX-2 PIPELINE RESULTS STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE BN -BOUNDARY NODE PU -PUMP LINE ' CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK-STORAGE TANK t ' PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER 41 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10-BNPU 0 . 10 510.20 1.37 3 11.53 0.02 1.45 1.19 ' 20 10 50 259.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.34 50 50 60 259.54 0.03 0.00 0.06 1.66 2.44 60-RV 60 70 259.54 0.03 0.00 0.06 1.66 2.44 ' 70 20 70 -259.54 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.34 80-XXCV 70 50 120-BNPU 0 110 1141.19 3.06 249.73 0.08 3.24 5.26 ' 130 110 100 636.85 4.07 0.00 0.03 1.81 1.79 140 20 120 259.54 0.20 0.00. 0.00 0.74 0.34 ' 150 120 130 123.64 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.09 160 130 140 -30.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.01 170 140 150 -296.14 0.27 0.00 0.01 0.84 0.43 ' 180 150 270 -480.36 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.06 220 100 190 156.49 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.13 230 190 200 -30.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.01 ' 240 200 210 -254.23 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.33 250 210 180 178.41 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.17 260 180 220 178.41 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.17 ' 280 100 240 480.36 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.06 290 240 250 480.36 0.08 0.00 0.22 3.07 7.64 300-RV 250 260 480.36 0.07 0.00 0.22 3.07 7.64 310-XXCV 260 240 320 260 270 480.36 0.01 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.06 ' 350 210 280 51.11 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.49 360 280 290 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 370 290 300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3n 90 310 220 -105.70 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.06 00 220 320 54.59 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.14 410 320 280 54.59 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.14 - 420-BNPU 0 330 1117.95 7.14 229.55 0.16 3.17 5.07 430 330 210 613.61 2.47 0.00 0.05 1.74 1.67 t • • JUNCTION NODE RESULTS ' JNCTN JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRLC JNCTN PRESSURE JNCTN No. TITLE DEMAND GRADE EL. HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10-1 DURSTON ROAD 250.66 5065.15 4750.00 315.15 136.56 20-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 4899.14 4748.00 151.14 65.49 50-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 5065.14 4750.00 315.14 136.56 60-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 5065.05 4750.00 315.05 136.52 70-1 DURSTON ROAD 0.00 4899.91 4750.00 149.91 64.96 ' 100-1 COTTONWOOD & 0.00 5025.49 4778.00 247.49 107.25 110-1 WEST BABCOCK 504.34 5029.59 4782.00 247.59 107.29 120-1 COTTONWOOD R 135.90 4898.94 4751.00 147.94 64.11 ' 130-1 COTTONWOOD R 154.02 4898.91 4758.00 140.91 61.06 140-1 COTTONWOOD R 265.76 4898.91 4765.00 133.91 58.03 150-1 COTTONWOOD R 184.22 4899.19 4770.00 129.19 55.98 180-1 FALLON STREE 0.00 5025.66 4806.00 219.66 95.19 190-1 COTTONWOOD R 187.24 5025.45 4782.00 243.45 105.49 200-1 COTTONWOOD R 223.48 5025.45 4788.00 237.45 102.89 ' 210-1 COTTONWOOD R 129.86 5025.73 4800.00 225.73 97.82 220-1 COTTONWOOD R 18.12 5025.63 4808.00 217.63 94.31 240-1 COTTONWOOD S 0.00 5025.48 4778.00 247.48 10 7.24 250-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 5025.19 4778.00 247.19 107.:2 260-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 4899.71 4778.00 121.71 52.74 270-1 COTTONWOOD R 0.00 4899.70 4776.00 123.70 53.60 ' 280-1 J.C.BILLION 105.70 5025.55 4797.00 228.55 99.04 290-1 BAXTER CREEK 0.00 5025.55 4792.00 233.55 101.20 300-1 BAXTER CREEK 0.00 5025.55 4804.00 221.55 96.00 310-1 BAXTER CREEK 105.70 5025.61 4812.00 213.61 92.56 320-1 J.C.BILLION 0.00 5025.59 4804.00 221.59 96.02 330-1 FALLON 504.34 5028.25 4802.00 226.25 98.04 ' REGULATING VALVE REPORT ' VALVE POSITION CONTROLLED VALVE VALVE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM THROUGH TYPE NODE PIPE SETTING STATUS GRADE GRADE FLOW (' ----------------- - --gPm) ft) (ft) (gPm) ---------( PRV-1 60 60 4900.00 THROTTLED 5065.05 4899.91 259.54 ' PRV-1 250 300 4900.00 THROTTLED 5025.19 4899.71 480.36 ' SUMMARY OF INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM BOUNDARY NODES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO BOUNDARY NODES ' PIPE FLOWRATE NUMBER (gpm) -------------------- 10 510.20 ' 120 1141.19 420 1117.95 ' NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 2769.34 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW= 0.00 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 2769.34 CYBERNET SIMULATION COMPLETED **** ' DATE: 9/22/1998 TIME: 10:26:20 ' 0 Description: BAXTER CREEK FIRE FLOW AND PEAK DEMAND WITH PEAK FLOWS PREDICTED FOR THE VALLEY WEST DEVELOPMENT Drawing: C:\BAX-2 Fire Flow Summary. Paae 1 JCT Peak Hour Peak Hr Zone Needed Available @Residual Min. Zone @JCT No. Demand Pressure No. Fire Flow Fire Flow Pressure Pressure No. ' ------ (jPm)----------- (Psi)--------(�Pm) (SPm) (Psi) (Psi) - - ------------------------------ 10 250.7 136.6 1 1750.7 2000.0 63.0 52.5 260 ' 20 0.0 65.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 58.8 51.7 260 50 0.0 136.6 1 1500.0 2000.0 63.0 52.5 260 ' 60 0.0 136.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 60.8 52.5 260 70 0.0 65.0 1 1500.0 2000.0 62.7 52.4 260 100 0.0 107.2 1 1500.0 2000.0 51.9 40.2 310 110 504.3 107.3 1 2004.3 2000.0* 50.7 41.0 310 ' 120 135.9 64.1 1 1635.9 2000.0 57.1 51.6 260 130 154.0 61.1 1 1654.0 2000.0 54.2 51.5 260 140. 265.8 58.0 1 1765.8 2000.0 51.9 51.3 260 150 184.2 56.0 1 1684.2 2000.0 51.5 51.0 260 180 0.0 95.2 1 1500.0 2000.0 35.2 32.6 310 190 187.2 105.5 1 1687.2 2000.0 49.3 39.1 310 200 223.5 102.9 1 1723.5 2000.0 46.0 37.7 310 210 129.9 97.8 1 1629.9 2000.0 40.2 35.0 310 220 18.1 943 1 1518.1 2000.0 33.2 31.5 310 240 0.0 107.2 1 1500.0 2000.0 51.9 40.3 310 250 0.0 107.1 1 1500.0 2000.0 51.4 42.3 310 260 0.0 52.7 1 1500.0 2000.0 50.5 46.3 310 270 0.0 53.6 1 1500.0 2000.0 51.3 46.5 310 ' 280 105.7 99.0 1 1605.7 2000.0 27.5 24.4 300 290 0.0 101.2 1 1500.0 1575.7 25.2 20.0 300 _ 300 0.0 96.0 1 1500.0 1334.7* 20.0 41.6 290 310 105.7 92.6 1 1605.7 2000.0 29.2 33.2 220 320 0.0 96.0 1 1500.0 2000.0 2 8.3) 29.6. 300 330 504.3 98.0 1 2004.3 2000.0* 39.9 35.9 310 1 - ' Description: BAXTER CREEK FIRE FLOW AND PEAK DEMAND WITHOUT PEAK FLOWS PREDICTED FOR THE VALLEY WEST DEVELOPMENT Drawing: C:\BAX-2 ' Fire Flow Summary. Page 1 � � ' JCT Peak Hour Peak Hour Zone Needed Available @Residual Min. Zone @JCT No. Demand Pressure No. Fire Flow Fire Flow Pressure Pressure No. (gpm) (Psi) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) (Psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 0.0 142.1 1 1500.0 2000*0 71.6 52.9 260 20 0.0 65.9 1 1500.0 2000.0 60.9 52.4 260 50 0.0 142.1 1 1500.0 2000.0 71.5 52.9 260 60 0.0 142.1 1 1500.0 2000.0 69.3 52.9 260 : 70 0.0 65.0 1 1500.0 2000.0 6 3.5 52.8 260 100 0.0 132.2 1 1500.0 2000.0 104.4 52.9 260 ' 110 0.0 130.4 1 1500.0 2000.0 104.3 52.9 260 120 0.0 64.6 1 1500.0 2000.0 59.7 52.3 260 130 0.0 61.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 56.9 52.2 260 ' 140 0.0 58.5 1 1500.0 2000.0 54.5 52.0 260 150 0.0 56.3 1 1500.0 2000.0 53.5 51.8 260 ' 180 0.0 120.0 1 1500.0 2000.0 89.3 52.9 260 190 0.0 130.4 1 1500.0 2000.0 102.5 52.9 260 200 0.0 127.8 1 1500.0 2000.0 99.7 52.9 260 ' 210 0.0 122.6 1 1500.0 2000.0 9 4.3) 52.9 260 220 0.0 119.2 1 1500.0 0.0* 0.0 0.0 0 240 0.0 132.2 1 1500.0 2000.0 104.3 52.9 260 ' 250 0.0 132.2 1 1500.0 2000.0 51.5 5 2.31 270 270 0.0 5 3.7 1 1500.0 2000.0 52.3 51.5 260 280 105.7 123.9 1 1605.7 2000.0 81.6 52.9 260 290 0.0 126.1 1 1500.0 2000.0 50.1 44.9 300 300 0.0 120.9 1 1500.0 1900.0 20.0 52.9 260 310 105.7 117.4 1 1605.7 2000.0 83.3 52.9 260 320 0.0 120.9 1 1500.0 2000.0 82.4 52.9 260 330 0.0 121.8 1 1500.0 2000.0 94.5 52.9 260 'I i ' J20 J70 6 D J60 Q ' DURSTON ROAD — 19 80 A . O ' Jt 0 N40 a JI 0 00 0 J1 0 C3 3 ' 4 0 z - 0 � a BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK WATER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC H Jl 0 0� w m O J 0w � Oo �c 130 J110 120 o WEST BABCOCK STREET — N J100 CD J 0 N w ' J200 41 BAXTER CREEK _ BUSINESS PARK--,-__ ru 1 J 0 ' J290 60 J280 3y0 0 430 w N PROPOSED FALLON STREET - J330 ps � o J 0 420 ' a J 0 — N 0 400 c J.C.BILLION J2 0 ' w AUTO PLAZA w a `° CD aI 00 380 J3 0 HUFFINE LANE (HWY 191) ;. • i i � f ' APPENDIX III STORMWATER CALCULATIONS AND 310 PERMIT r 0 • Competition Drive Culvert- Baxter Creek rWorksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File untitled.fm2 ' Worksheet Baxter Creek Subdivision Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data ' Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Diameter 48.00 in Discharge 203.13 cfs r Results Depth 3.28 ft Flow Area 11.02 ft2 ' Wetted Perimeter 9.06 ft Top Width 3.08 ft Critical Depth 3.86 ft ' Percent Full 81.96 Critical Slope 0.017483 ft/ft Velocity 18.43 ft/s Velocity Head 5.28 ft Specific Energy 8.56 ft Froude Number 1.72 ' Maximum Discharge 218.51 cfs Full Flow Capacity 203.13 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 1 1 1 r . i . r . )V 273 (Rev. 07/01/97) (file name 273.97) 3TREAMBED AND LAND PRESERVATtL qcT.12,0D APP, ATION NO. GD-45-98 ervisors' Decision) DECISION DATE 7/16/98 RMI 1 ce: Landowner permission,easements or other federal,state,or local permits,licenses, special use permits,or authorizations n be required before construction of the project It is the duty of the holder of this permit to determine which are necessary and ��in them prior to construction of the project. �ameofApplicant Wetlands West, Inc. Address 13 S. Willson Ave. , Suite 8 City Rn7aman State r1T Zip 59715 lerennial Stream Baxter stream/ditch Iu pervisors' Decision (circle): Approved Approved w/Modificatio Denied Not a Project planation: See attached (if more room is necessary) ' An inspection was held on July 14, 1998. You applied to do the following: Located along Baxter Ck immediately west of the JC Billion Auto Plaza on Huffine Lane in Bozeman. Involves the placement of a 71" by 47" arched CMP culvert in Baxter Ck to provide through access for the commercial subdivision. Will be placed at the ' same time restoration activities are underway. See application #GD-46-98. Will affect approx. 60 linear ft of Baxter Ck. Riparian corridor and associated wetlands total approx. .20 acres. In-stream materials will consist of clea,4i,pit- run gravels, approx. 866.6 cu yds. ' Approval has been granted with the following modifications: Culvert should be set 6-8 inclies below grade on stream gradient. orrk mit Expiration Date July 16, 1999 may not commence on a project for 15 days after receipt of this decision unless district has checked box below. Waiver of 15-day Waiting Period �pervisors' Signatures: tto Transmitted to Applicant and Department Team Member July 21 , 1998 e applicant must agree to abide by the conditions of this permit by checking the appropriate box,signing below,and returning this form to the district office within 15 days. I hereby agree to proceed with the project in accordance with the approved application and will allow follow-up inspection. I hereby agree to proceed with the project in accordance with the modifications contained herein, and will allow follow-up inspection. i I understand the project as proposed has been denied, and I may resubmit my application with modifications. If the applicant disagrees with the supervisors'decision and wishes to formally resolve the dispute, the applicant must check box below, sign, and return this form to the district within 5 working days. I disagree with the supervisors' decision and hereby request arbitration. 7n1re of&plicant: Date —] Z�,7 r� EXISTING CULVERT HUFFINE LN ' Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description ' Project File c:\haestad\academic\fmw\baxter c.fm2 Worksheet BAXTER CREEK BUSINESS PARK CULVERT Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Full Flow Capacity Input Data ' Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Channel Slope 0.020000 ft/ft Diameter 54.00 in Results ' Depth 4.50 ft Discharge 150.63 cfs Flow Area 15.90 ft2 ' Wetted Perimeter 14.14 ft Top Width 0.00 ft Critical Depth 3.60 ft Percent Full 100.00 Critical Slope 0.020928 ft/ft Velocity 9.47 ft/s ' Velocity Head 1.39 ft Specific Energy FULL ft Froude Number FULL ' Maximum Discharge 162.04 cfs Full Flow Capacity 150.63 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.020000 ft/ft 1 1 1 1 k ORM WATER CALCULATIONSDIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999TENTION POND LOT#1 RFACE C AREA RKING 0.85 2.59 REET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.69 INDSCAPED 0.25 1.94 TURAL 0.20 0.43 TAL 5.65 TANCE(FT) 1470.00 UNDEVELOPED) 0.20 (DEVELOPED) 0.59 SLOPE% 1.50 (TIME OF CONC.) 30.48 SIGN STORM(10YR) (RAINFALL INTENSITY 0.99 'LEASE RATE Qu= 1.12 i ORM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS JRATION FLOW VOLUME (I) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D<Tc IN) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. I 28 1.05 3.241 2640.05 VOL= 29 1.03 3.28 2661.00 (Qd-Qu)"((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))"60 30 1.00 3.32 2680.13 (Qd=CIA-D/Tc) RM INTENsrn DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS RATION FLOW VOLUME (D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. ERE: D=Tc VOL= IN) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc'(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 30.48 0.99 3.34 2688.69 RM INTENSI DEVELOPEE POND EQUATIONS fRATION FLOW VOLUME (I) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D>Tc t (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) as 0.78 2.63 2800.98 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 45 0.771 1 2.591 2801.32 IVOL= as 0.761 1 2.561 2800.78 (Qd-QU)'((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))'60 47 0.751 1 2.521 2799.38 ORIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE J_ ATION-Q=CLHA1.5 ERE: ` RELEASE RATE(CFS) 1.12 C=3.33 3.33 WIDTH OF OPENING(FT ? In DEPTH DISCHARGE(FT)- 1.00 ORIFICE SIZE= 0.34 (FT) 4.05 (IN) RAINFALL POWER CURVE ' FREQUENCY X = HR ly = IN/HR 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 ' 5 YEAR Y = 0.52 X-54 65 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X 1 .64 25 YEAR Y =0.78 X66 50 YEAR Y 0.92 X-.6 7 100 YEAR Y = 1 .0 1 X 6 c c L C Ld U .4 1 zLd .Z d T V) }O 1 Lu Z 3 LLJ � J ` J J� < J LL Z z_ a 2 I N 1 I I ' 1 I I f I I O i 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 1 I DURATION IN MINUTES II RAINFALL I NTENSi TY- DURATION CURVES Fic-uRE B0'47- EMAN, tAU4TANA 23 9:5'cJ C`i NOAA A i LAS 2,VOL.1 •� i —► �— 3' T YP. 112 X #I0 CARBON STEEL EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET 112 X #10 CARBON STEEL / 4' OPENING EXPANDED. METAL GRATING 1 PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN I I 1 I 12• POND BOTTOM TO TOP OF INLET II 36' —— — l—_ aTl_LI I TI=1 I I � � I � 18• 30' A— d' —e e = 12• RCP - _ _ -�-� L - - - - - --- -- - -� - -rTT�, �. :� 4. ORIFICE • 36' UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #1 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #1 RM WATER CALCULATIONS BAXTER CREEK BUSI�M PARK DIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 mw (DETENTION POND LOT#2 FACE C AREA KING 5 KING (ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.23 DSCAPED 0.25 0.34 URAL 0.20 0.22 AL 1.41 CETANCE(FT) 360.00 � NDEVELOPED) 0.20 C EVELOPED) 0.60 SLOPE% 1.50 �T IME OF CONC.) 14.80 D�IGN STORM(10YR) RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.59 R,EASE RATE Qu= 0.45 S RM INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS D TION FLOW VOLUME ( (1) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D<Tc (�) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. 12 1.82 1.261 511.13 VOL= 13 1.73 1.29 522.11 (Qd-Qu)'((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))'60 14 1.65 1.331 531.38 (Qd=CIA'Drrc) S RM INTENSI DEVELOPEO POND EQUATIONS DWATION FLOW VOLUME (D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. W RE: D=Tc VOL= O (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)"((Tc'(1-(Qu/Qd)))`60 14.80 1.59 1.35 537.72 S RM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS D TION FLOW VOLUME ( (I) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D>Tc (�) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 20 1.31 1.11 559.94 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 21 1.27 1.08 561.22 VOL= 22 1.231 1.05 561.71 <__ (Qd-Qu)'((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))'60 23 1.191 1.02 561.46 10RIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE IE TION-Q=CLH^1.5 IV RE: Q- ELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.45 C=3.33 3.33 L IDTH OF OPENING(FT HWEPTH DISCHARGE(FT)- 1.00 ORIFICE SIZE= 0.13 (FT) 1.62 (IN) 1 RAINFALL POWER CJRVE 1 FREQUENCY X = HR ly = IN/HR 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X '60 64 ' S YEAR Y = 0.52 X165 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X 25 YEAR Y =0.78 X-64 50 YEAR Y =0.92X-.57 10.0 YEAR Y = 1 .0 1 X i 6 ' ' c c O_ i to c , C u c- cn, C N 1 Z Q V7 )- w3 z ' Z W C J u- 1 J -i lL Z_ Z cr 2 1 � I � I 1 f io 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 1 I DURATION IN MINUTES I i ' RAINFALL INTENSITY- WRAT10N CURycS FIc-jRE BO"17- cMAN, fACf1TANA 23 SASE) C14 NOAA ATLAS 2,VOL.I 3• rrP. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1/r X 410 CARBON STEEL EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OI' POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO '[LIP OF INLET Ili! X "I(I CARBON STEfa- / 1.6' OPE ING I I — EXPANDED METAL GRATING I I L n E I—_ I / PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN 10 TOP ❑F INLET I r �j-(T_�-( I / I tz• 11 PfINU BOTTOM 36' -- - I--- -i f k '-[h:--I I 1_'il... I I 18 30' o e 12' RCP ——m, — — _MLL1_ L — - - - -- -- - - -� �LL � ORIFICE 36' UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #2 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #2 RM WATER CALCULATIONS 13AXTER CREEK BUSIDda-SS PARK DIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 TENTION POND LOT#3 _SURFACE C AREA KING 5 EET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.23 DSCAPED 0.25 0.22 ' URAL 0.20 0.00 AL 1.10 I fTANCE(FT) 300.00 NDEVELOPED) 0.20 EVELOPED) 0.73 SLOPE% 1.50 ;IffTIME OF CONC.) 10.08 IGN STORM(10YR) NFALL INTENSITY 2.04 1EASE RATE Qu= 0.45 RM INTENSI MDEVELOPE POND 1EQUATIONS FLOW VOLUME fATION (1) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D<Tc (�) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. 7 2.59 1.441 470.88 VOL= 8 2.37 1.511 490.99 (Qd-Qu)*((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))*60 9 2.20 1.58 507.61 (Qd=CIA*Drrc) iSaRM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS ,CWATION FLOW VOLUME ,(D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. .WHERE: D=Tc VOL= (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)*((Tc*(1-(Qu/Qd)))*60 I 10.08 2.04 1.64 522.32 i RM INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME ( (1) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D>Tc ( ) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 15 1.58 1 1.27 559.66 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 18 1.40 1.12 566.01 IVOL= f 19 1.35 1.09 566.15 <== (Qd-Qu)*((D-Tc)*(Qu/Qd))*60 20 1.31 1.051 565.43 (ORIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE ,E ATION-Q=CLH^1.5 RE: - RELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.45 �C=3.33 3.33 IDTH OF OPENING(FT ? IL H fDEPTH DISCHARGE(FTj 1 14 1.00 ORIFICE SIZE= 0.13 (FT) 1.62 (IN) i I rRow RAINFALL7T POWER CURVE 1 FREQUENCY IX = HR Y = IN/HR 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 1 5 YEAR Y = 0.52 X-.64 65 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X .64 25 YEAR Y = 0.78 X- 1 50 YEAR Y =0.92X-.66 100 YEAR Y = 1 .0 1 X 1 6 1 c c 1 � v � I O c I` r c c i U � tn Lu �N r W } �o r z 3 W — ¢ I Z z < 2 N 1 I i 1 1 1 0 i 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 1 DURATION IN MINUTES I RAINFALL I i'�TENSI i Y- GIIRAi lON CURVES FIGUFE B0 lZEMAN, MCflTANA I 23 SASE0 Cti NOAA ATLAS 2,VCL.I + 3' TYP. 112 X 010 CARBON STEEL EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET 112 X 410 CARBON STEEL I NG EXPANDED METAL GRATING 1.6' OPE I I=r!I=II'I PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN -IJ P 111 101' Ill- INLET I 36' L=IJ I=11��I POND BOTTOM I a �T II I.- RCP - - - - L---- ---- -J T m�' 4' 1.6. ORIFICE 36' UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #3 -OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #3 RM WATER CALCULATIONS R DIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 DETENTION POND LOT#4 _ FACE C AREA KING 0.85 0.38 EET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.23 JDSCAPED 0.25 0.25 URAL 0.20 0.00 AL 0.86 .CITi ANCE(FT) 265.00 'CWNDEVELOPED) 0.20 C(DEVELOPED) 0.68 PE% 1.50 IME OF CONC.) 10.87 IGN STORM(10YR) RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.94 'PLEASE RATE Qu= 0.33 S RM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS ,CRATION FLOW VOLUME (D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) 'WHERE: D<Tc t ) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. 8 2.37 1.011 335.80 VOL= 9 2.20 1.06 347.78 (Qd-Qu)'((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))`60 10 2.05 1.10 357.66 (Qd=CIA'Dlfc) 'S RM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS 'D TION FLOW VOLUME (D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. RE: D=Tc VOL= (r ) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc'(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 i 10.87 1.94 1.131 364.77 i I ;S t M INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS bDTION FLOW VOLUME I(D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D>Tc (�) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 17 1.45 0.841 388.37 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 181 1.401 0.81 388.98 1<_= VOL= 19 1.351 0.79 388.90 (Qd-QU)'((D-TC)'(QU/Qd))'60 201 1.311 0.76 388.21 ORIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE E ATION-Q=CLH^1.5 ,WffRE: - Q 7---7RELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.33 'C=3.33 3.33 iL MVIDTH OF OPENING(FT ? IH IWEPTH DISCHARGE(FT) 1.00 O ICE SIZE= 0.10 (FT) 1.20 (IN) 1 � RAINFALL POWER CURVE ' FREQUENCY X = HR IY = IN/HR ' 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 5 YEAR Y = 0.5 2 X-'54 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X-' 65 ' 25 YEAR Y =0 .78 X. 64 50 YEAR Y = 0.9 2 X-.6 6 100 YEAR Y = 1 .0 1 X ' 6 c c_ E 1 O c C u Z N,n �N ' z Q _ Lit T � =O (n T Z 3 0 ' J � J �n lCi Z =_ c 2 I N 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 1 DURATION IN MINUTES I RAINFALL I NTENSITY- DURA i lON CUR ME-S. FIGJPE BOZEMAN, WflTANA 23 9a5EJ Ci'r NO.SA ATLAS9 ri_L —" — 3' TYP. 112 X 010 CARBON STEEL EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET I 112'X 010 CARBON STEEL I I iFr EXPANDED METAL GRATING 1,2• ppE NG I i / \ i PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN W TT fI — TO TOP OF INLET I _ - l�l II L!r I I 18' POND 8❑i'iOM 36' I 30' — — I I Id a °• —�, 1Tf I 12' RCP — — q L-- -----------J — -TT 4' 1.2' ORIFICE 36' • UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #4 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #4 JJPRM WATER CALCULATIONS EDIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 lw )ETENTION POND LOT#5 j66RFACE C AREA KING 0.85 0.43 EET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 WILDING 0.85 0.23 DSCAPED 0.25 0.17 URAL 0.20 0.00 AL 0.83 VANCE(FT) 260.00 NDEVELOPED) 0.20 :(DEVELOPED) 0.73 ;L PE% 1.50 IME OF CONC.) 9.46 IGN STORM(10YR) tAINFALL INTENSITY 2.13 EASE RATE Qu= 0.35 M INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME f E (I) (Qd) (VOL) VHERE: D<Tc �) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. 7 2.59 1.16 352.23 VOL= 8 2.37 1.21 366.51 (Qd-Qu)"((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))'60 9 2.20 1.26 378.17 (Qd=CIA'Drfc) i RM INTENSI DEVELOPEq POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW I VOLUME �) (1) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. II)RE: D=Tc IVOL= (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc'(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 9.46 2.13 1.28 382.74 fRM INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME D (I) (Qd) (VOL) •/HERE: D>Tc �) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 15 1.58 0.95 412.20 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 16 1.51 0.91 413.76 VOL= 17 1.451 0.881 414.47 <== (Qd-QU)'((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))'60 181 1.401 0.841 414.41 )RIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE TION-Q=CLH^1.5 I RE: ' I- ELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.35 =3.33 3.33 JIDTH OF OPENING(FT EPTH DISCHARGE(FT) 1.00 )RIFICE SIZE= 0.11 (FT) 1.27 (IN) RAINFALL POWER CURVE FREQUENCY X = HR ly = IN/HR ' 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 5 YEAR Y = 0.52 X '64 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X�65 ' 2.5 YEAR Y =0.76 X-.64 50 YEAR Y = 0.92 X-.66 10.0 YEAR Y = 1 .01X_ 67 6 ' c c u u 4 ' U ' Z Q W } z 3 W uj J ` lei Z _ 1 � 2 i N I II I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 tDURATION IN MINUTES I l RAINFALL I N i LiNSI l Y- DURATION CUrtycS FIGURE B071- EMAN, MONTANA 23 9a — —t -� 3' TYP. 1/2 X 010 CARBON STEEL r EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET 112 X N10 CARBON STEEL 1.3. OPE I NG EXPANDED METAL GRATING � PAINTED BLACK - FASTCN —III—III—III— I I 12 TO TOP OF INLET I 71�1�77j1�'� 1 36' II I I 1 18' POND BOTTOM I 31 I I d 12 RCP — —LL— -ffl-- n -- L_------ ----- -� 1.3' ORIFICE 36' •UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #5 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #5 A RM WATER CALCULATIONSBAXTER CREEK 131-161F� PA JKWIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 DETENTION POND LOT#6 S,60FACE C AREA KING 0.85 0.56 EET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.23 �DSCAPED 0.25 0.43 URAL 0.20 0.00 T6fAL 1.22 DANCE(FT) 340.00 NDEVELOPED) 0.20 �C(DEVELOPED) 0.64 �S PE 0 1.50 �T IME OF CONC.) 13.38 D IGN STORM(10YR) RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.70 RASE RATE Qu= 0.41 IS SR INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS 1D TION FLOW VOLUME M (D (1) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D<Tc (�) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. 10 2.05 1.19 463.87 VOL= 11 1.93 1.23 477.05 (Qd-Qu)'((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))'60 12 1.82 1.27 488.18 (Qd=CIA'Drrc) S M INTENSI DEVELOPEq POND EQUATIONS D TION FLOW VOLUME (D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. W RE: D=Tc VOL= ( (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc"(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 13.38 1.70 1.32 500.71 S M INTENSITYDEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS D TION FLOW VOLUME (D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D>Tc ( (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 19 1.35 1.05 526.33 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. i 20 1.31 1.02 527.66 IVOL= 21 1.27 0.99 528.21 <__ (Qd-QU)'((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))'60 22 1.231 0.96 528.05 ORIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE E TION-Q=CLH^1.5 W E: P RELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.41 'C=3.33 3.33 ,L�IDTH OF OPENING(FT ? I EPTH DISCHARGE(FT 1.00 O CE SIZE= 0.12 (FT) 1.49 (IN) RAINFALL POWER CURVE ' FREQUENCY X = HR ly = IN/HR 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 ' S YEAR Y = 0.52 X�65 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X ' 25 YEAR Y =0.78 X .64 50 YEAR Y =0.92X_ 66 100 YEAR Y = 1 .01X 6 1 c c 1 4 � C N ' z � W T Lu z 3 W l J ` 1 J J_-0 lLi Z z < 2 ' N I I I I i ol 1 I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 1 1 DURATION IN MINUTES RAINFALL INTENSITY- DURATION CUrrycS FIC-URE 1 B0-47- EMAN, MONTANA 23 BASED Cti NOAA ATLAS2.VC`.l �— 3' TYP. 1/2 X MIO CARBON STEEL EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET 1-- I 1/2 X #10 CARBON STEEL I I -I I— EXPANDED METAL GRATING 1,5' OPE TNG I II—III—w I— I / PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN = � I I I2, TO TOP OF INLET I n 36' _— — (_— � IIII�II Illl LL I 1 I 1o, POND BOTTOM ��-II --I - - - I- - f- I I I I 30, —— A ((77 I I-IT I—I I T_ FF 12' RCP L-------- - -- --J = i�TT"' ' 1.5' ORIFICE 36' UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #6 OUTI__ET STRUCTURE - 1--OT #6 RM WATER CALCULATIONS DIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 DETENTION POND LOT#7 FACE C AREA KING 0.85 0.39 , EET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.23 JDSCAPED 0.25 0.43 URAL 0.20 0.00 AL 1.05 CWANCE(FT) 360.00 NDEVELOPED) 0.20 C(DEVELOPED) 0.60 1.50 S PE% IME OF CONIC.) 14.79 IIGN STORM(10YR) RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.59 JEASE RATE Qu= 0.33 �M INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME (D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) WHERE: D<Tc t ) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. 10 2.05 0.881 360.141 VOL= 12 1.82 0.941 381.08 (Qd-Qu)'((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))'60 13 1.73 0.96 389.27 (Qd=CIA'DlTc) S RM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS DWATION FLOW VOLUME ;D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. RE: D=Tc VOL= (I)RE: (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc'(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 14.79 1.59 1.011 400.83 3 RM INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME ;D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) NHERE: D>Tc �) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 20 1.31 0.83 417.44 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 22 1.23 0.78 418.75 - IVOL= 23 1.19 0.76 418.57 (Qd-QU)"((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))"60 24 1.16 0.74 417.89 DRIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE TION-Q=CLH^1.5 RE: - ]m--TRELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.33 =3.33 3.33 IDTH OF OPENING(FT ? i WEPTH DISCHARGE(FT)- 1.00 DFjjkICE SIZE= 0.10 (FT) 1.20 (IN) RAINFALL POWER CURVE FREQUENCY X = HR ly = IN/H.R 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 5 YEAR Y = 0.52 X-.64 65 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X 2.5 YEAR Y =0 .78 X .66 64 50 YEAR Y =0.92X-.57 100 YEAR Y = 1 .0 1 X ' 6 ' c Li ' S � , f O I I I y j Z No Lu ' z Q } Lu z 3 w J ` z I 2 N ' 0 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 ' DUFATION IN MINUTES I RAINFALL I NTENSI r Y- WRA ION CURVES FIGURE B0'< PENAN, MCWANA 23 9--5_D C44 NOAA e-i IC!) .i..- -►— 3' TYP. • 112 X #10 CARBON STEEL TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN EXPANDED METAL GRATING i TO TOP OF' INLET I X q10 CARBON STEEL 1.2' OPE EX I NG EXPANDED METAL GRATING � I I""-'III-_II PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET I — I 1 36' - I II I I I 18, POND BOTTOM 30' 4 a [THE.. 4I�I' 12' RCP — — — — — �- -------- -J iIIIFRI 1.2' ORIFICE 36' UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #7 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #7 RM WATER CALCULATIONS BAXTER CREEK-90SIN& P;NRK DIFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 DETENTION POND LOT#8 FACE C AREA KING 5 .41 LET(ASPHALT) 0.85 0.00 BUILDING 0.85 0.23 DSCAPED 0.25 0.54 URAL 0.20 0.00 TOTAL 1.18 ANCE(FT) 380.00 ITNDEVELOPED) 0.20 C(DEVELOPED) 0.58 PE% 1.50 TIME OF CONC.) 16.08 IGN STORM(10YR) RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.51 EASE RATE Qu= 0.36 RM INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME A (1) (Qd) (VOL) , RE: D<Tc j (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. _ 10 2.05 0.87 366.90 VOL= 12 1.82 0.92 390.32 (Qd-Qu)'((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))'60 15 1.58 1.00 414.07 I(Qd=CIA'D/Tc) 3 RM INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. ,.][)RE: D=Tc VOL= (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc'(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 16.08 1.51 1.02 420.03 3 RM INTENSI DEVELOPE POND EQUATIONS TION FLOW VOLUME D) (I) (Qd) (VOL) RE: D>Tc � (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 20 1.31 0.89 432.88 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 231 1.19 0.811 435.35 - VOL= 24 1.16 0.791 435.03 (Qd-Qu)'((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))"60 251 1.13 0.771 434.20 )RIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE ATION-Q=CLH^1.5 RE: - =RELEASE RATE(CFS) 0.36 3.33 3.33 tIDTH OF OPENING(FT) ? 1EPTH DISCHARGE(FT) 1.00 )JWICE SIZE= 0.11 (FT) 1.28 (IN) i I 1 RAINFALL POWER CURVE 1 FREQUENCY X = HR ly = IN/HR 2 YEAR Y = 0.36 X .60 1 F, YEAR Y = 0.52 X-.64 65 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X�64 1 2.5 YEAR Y =0.78 X 66 5fl YEAR Y =0.92X_*67 100 YEAR Y = 1 .01X 1 6 1 c cLu i � ► c 1 � i } =o I 3 j 1 z W J 1 -i l<L tQ+ Z z 2 i 1 � N I ` I I I ` 00 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 1 I DURATION IN MINUTES 1 1 ' RAINFALL INTENSi r Y- CURAi 10N CURycS FIGURE . 1 B0"97- EMANI MUM iANA 23 BASE0QiH �— 3' TYP. 1/2 X #10 CARBON STEEL EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET 1--- I -FT 1/(.'. X 010 CARBON SI'f13_ 1.3' OPEING / I _ !_XPAN DI:II METAL GRATING PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN _ _ TO TOP OF INLET I II—.III_I�I_�- I I 12 POND BOTTOM I 30. — — I I I d' a —_ 4— m — 12' RCP — J1— L_— ————— — ——— — —1 4' .J 1.3' ORIFICE 36' UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #8 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #8 3 M WATER CALCULATIONS IFIED RATIONAL METHOD JANUARY, 1999 DETENTION POND LOT#9 54WACE C AREA ING 0.85 0.00 5 ET(ASPHALT) 0.85 1.77 BUILDING 0.85 0.00 SCAPED 0.25 0.00 RAL 0.20 0.00 r L 1.77 DI NCE(FT) 600.00 GUTTER FLOW& 330'STORM SEWER FLOW @ 5.56 FT/S I C DEVELOPED) 0.20 --(DEVELOPED) 0.85 SLOPE% 1.50 rc ME OF CONC.) 10.63 ] N STORM(10YR) RAINFALL INTENSITY 1.97 RE,ASE RATE Qu= 0.70 3T M INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS I DU TION FLOW VOLUME D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) NHERE: D<TC MI' (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) DURATION <TIME OF CONC. _ 8 2.37 2.68 1019.44 VOL= 9 2.20 2.80 1056.57 (Qd-Qu)'((Tc-D)'(Qu/Qd))'60 10 2.05 2.90 1088.39 (Qd=CIA'D/rc) 3T M INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS )U TION FLOW I VOLUME D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) DURATION =TIME OF CONC. E: D=Tc VOL= MI (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (Qd-Qu)'((Tc"(1-(Qu/Qd)))'60 10.63 1.97 2.97 1106.13 3T INTENSI DEVELOPEC POND EQUATIONS )U TON FLOW I VOLUME D) (1) (Qd) (VOL) VHERE: D>Tc MIt� (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 23 1.19 1.80 1243.07 DURATION >TIME OF CONC. 24 1.16 1.75 1243.25 <_= VOL= 25 1.13 1.70 1242.36 (Qd Qu)'((D-Tc)'(Qu/Qd))'60 26 1.101 1.66 1240.47 )RIFICE SIZE CALCULATIONS FOR RELEASE STRUCTURE .Q4ff ION-Q=CLH^1.5 VH = LEASE RATE(CFS) 0.70 =3.33 3.33 TH OF OPENING(FT ? I= PTH DISCHARGE(FT) 1.00 )RIFI E SIZE= 0.21 (FT) 2.51 (IN) 1 -� �- 3' TYP. 1/2 X #10 CARBON STEEL -- - EXPANDED METAL GRATING TOE OF POND SLOPE PAINTED BLACK - FASTEN TO TOP OF INLET 1/2 X #10 CARBON STEEL 2.5' OPENING I III = EXPANDED METAL GRATING I 1 PAINTED BLACK -OF INLET FASTEN I II =L-- POND BOTTOM 30' -- - 1 12 RCP - - - E- - - ----- -J - _ III,�.1� 4. J 2.5' ORIFICE 36' • UNDISTURBED NATIVE MATERIAL PLAN ELEVATION DETENTION POND #9 OUTLET STRUCTURE - LOT #9 1 0 #9 RAINFALL POWER CURVE 1 FREQUENCY X = HR IY = IN/HR 2 YEAR Y = 0.36X •60 5 YEAR Y = 0.52 X-.64 10 YEAR Y = 0.64X�65 25 YEAR Y =0.78 X-.64 50 YEAR Y = 0.9 2 X_.6 6 100 YEAR Y = 1 .OIX ' 6 1 c c_ LO 1 1 O c C G I y U z W } _O 1 � 3 z W 1 J G J LL _Z =_ Q 2 i 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 60 70 DURATION IN MINUTES RAINFALL I NTBNSI r Y- GURAiION CURycS FIC-URE 1 B0ZEMAN, Wfl-IANA 23 BaS=� G+i NOVA e-1 1c , —1 1 ' Culvert Calculator Report NORTON STREET CULVERT Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary ' Allowable HW Elevation 101.50 ft Headwater Depth/Height 1.20 Computed Headwater Elevation 101.50 ft Discharge 5.43 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev 101.50 ft Tailwater Elevation 1.00 ft Outlet Control HW Elev 101.50 ft Control Type Entrance Control Grades i 1 Upstream Invert 100.00 ft Downstream Invert 99.40 ft Length 40.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.015000 ft/ft Hydraulic Profile ' Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 0.77 ft Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 0.76 ft Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 0.94 ft ' Velocity Downstream 6.84 fbs Critical Slope 0.008351 ft/ft Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Section Material Concrete Span 1.25 ft Section Size 15 inch Rise 1.25 ft I . Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev 101.50 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.46 ft Ke 0.20 Entrance Loss 0.09 ft li Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev 101.50 ft Flow Control Transition Inlet Type Beveled ring,33.7°bevels Area Full 1.2 ft' K 0.00180 HDS 5 Chart 3 ' M 2.50000 HDS 5 Scale 2 C 0.02430 Equation Form 1 Y 0.83000 roject Title: BAXTER CREEK Project Engineer:MRS \haestad\academic\cvm\projectl.cvm CulvertMaster v1.0 /28/99 02:45:57 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1