Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300222954687566) -2-972`6 CARSON PLACE TOWNH'S ZONING PUD 1304 west Babcock Street Lowell Springer February 27, 1997 d N lfl v N Ql L a I i u FILE FOLDERS LEGAL SIZE-SPAI PA ,Htrrlatiur2r!�r SP.flictKrda G:.AUznia.uA 4. . PROJECT ACTIVITY LOGS BOZEMAN CITY--COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE Project Name File No. STAFF STAFF CUMULATIV- i DATE ACTIVITY PERSON HOURS STAFF TIME 3 I I Ws s i ` IrNI I I I I I I ,FILE REVIEW SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Application Date: a 2 7 !n / Staff Member: File Number: � l� �P Reference Files: a-P-9�51 File Name: c DATE DONE ; BY Staff/Agency Comment equ s ed : Staff/Agency Comment Deadline: Public Hearing Notice ; To Chronicle: q /-7 S Public Hearing Notice In Chronicle: Public Hearing Notice Sent To Adjacent Property Owners: ; g�- Public Hearing Notice Posted : Staff Report Due: y ; Staff Report ( packet) Sent Out: C/z ; Planning Board Meeting : �J ; Action : City Commission Meeting : Action : Letter To Applicant ; Regarding Decision : ; 6 Month Review Due: ; 12 Month Review Due: ; Letter of Credit Received : Letter of Credit Released : ; Final CUP Issued : ; MISC\REVIEW.CUP CONDITIONAL USE PLUMIT APPLICATION P.U.D. PRELIMINARY PLAN P.U.D. MASTER PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUBMITTALS FOR CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES A NINETEEN - UNIT P.U.D. COMPLEX SPRINGER GROUP Mary Francesca Palffy VIC[N[TY/ZONING N4AP ARCHITECTS %H.A.Bolinger(Box 1047) 201 SOUTH WALLACE. Bozeman,MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715 �I (406)585-2400 Carol J. Graybill 1328 W.Babcock L=GAL DESCRIPTION Bozeman,MT 59715 A tract of land located Robert&Ruth Goodell in the E 1/2 SW 1/4 of 1336 W.Babcock Section 12,T2S,R5E, Bozeman,MT 59715 M.2.M., Gallatin County, wrr, Mcntana Dwight E.Richard = _ 1320 W.Babcock «µ` Bozeman,MT 59715 STREET ADDRESS «nu Eva A.Kenney ,...... 1301 W. Babcock 1404 W.Babcock It 2.izeman;Montana 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 it I' " J/NER/DEVELOPER Heritage Condo Assoc. %John French Jr. Don Bockhahn 218 Pioneer Drive 1500 Mountain Goat Road Bozeman,MT 59715 El jI Bozeman,Montana 59715 CA►COCr ST. Kathryn H, Conser LIST OF OWNERS 1216 W.Babcock Bozeman,MT 59715 Les Parlova Lee Woodriff Marci L.Cordial, t at Buckeye Associates' 1304 W.Babcock 159 Creekside Bozeman,MT 59715 Half Moon Bay,CA 94019 Ralph&MaJa.i'l.hallcndcr Mike Steiner 222 South t.'.h 304 South 13th Boz,n.a.:,::.i 59715 i rot■ sr. Bozeman,MT•59715 James E. k Marlene Shortzt 221 South 13th Bozeman,MT 59715 iTOaT ST. Jarvis&Sue Anne Brown 305 South 13th Bozeman,MT 59715 Janet D. Bertino 309 South 13th Bozeman,MT 59715 f 1 fj i t LTV i, y � p j y, t • i 4xy •t A�� >j��u. g.9C 1 r• t.; jo e { s . { •iq f " ,K J 4� n�~i•.jet r Zk Zvi jz ,yg •tY �; s F .t�Y��� -t � �7a : t RECEIVED BY ` AUG 0 9 1996 CITY-COUNTY FLANNINA CI l F�- �T 'C`'�ti.il �e'a4 • Springer Group Architects, P.C. ' 201 South Wallace Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' 1. LETTER OF INTRODUCTION ' 2. PROLOGUE: COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ' 4. PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION ' 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT&COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT ' 7. PROPOSED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 8. ATTACHMENT I: REDUCED DRAWINGS ' • A-1 Site Plan and Information Sheet w/info ' • A-3 Floor Plans ' • A-4 Elevations • P-1 Preliminary Plat 1 - 9. TRAFFIC STUDY 1 10. ATTACHMENT II: BACKGROUND INFORMATION • Previous Meeting Minutes and misc. information ' 0 Proposed Joint access & easement agreements LETTER OF INTRODUCTION 1 ' • Springer Group Architects, P.C. 201 South Wallace Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 1 Voice # (406) 585-2400 Fax # (406) 585-7446 July 29, 1996 ' Bozeman City-County Planning Department 404 E. Main Bozeman, MT 59715 ■ RE: Conditional Use Permit Carson Place ' A Planned Unit Development on West Babcock Preliminary Review ' Sirs and Madames: ' Included herein is the conditional use permit application and the subsequent submittal for review of the preliminary plan and preapplication plat for Carson Place, a residential planned unit development to be developed on a tract of land located in the E 1/2 SW 1/4 of Section 12, T2S, R5E, M.P.M., Gallatin County, Montana, south of West Babcock between 19th and llth Avenues in Bozeman. ' The development is a 19 unit townhouse development including approximately 1.9 acres and 6 buildings with approximately 1000 square feet of living space on each of the 19 individual lots. ' All lots will share in privilege of use and the obligation of cost to maintain the common areas including parking, drives, landscaping, etc. as well as maintenance of all other exterior surfaces ' and materials. Included in this submittal are design drawings and documentation addressing all pertinent issues ' as described in section 18.54 of the Interim Zoning Code. As an aid in evaluating this submittal, the checklists for the preliminary plan and development ' review criteria are included on the following pages. Each item of the checklists are addressed and/or described in the order as presented in the checklist as follows. ' If you have any questions or you desire any further information, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, ' Lowell W. Springer LWS: kr ■ I � PROLOGUE ' PURSUIT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES INTENT OF CARSON PLACE A. To establish an alternative source of affordable housing within the guidelines of improvement and protection of Public Health, Safety Welfare and Beautification of the City of Bozeman. The City and territorial zoning limits are divided into zones or districts. This 1.9 acre parcel is in the R3 Residential Medium Density District. The proposed P.U.D. complies with the intent of the R3 Zone to provide for and encourage development of one to five family residential structures near service facilities. B. To develop and enhance the proposed site to provide for the affordable housing needs of the community and trade area, by providing easily accessible affordable housing at the present vacant property on this West Babcock location. Landscaping, traffic and drainage control calculations have met the need to have the least impact, yet most beneficial aspect to the surrounding area. C. Access to the proposed site from an Arterial (Babcock Street) in an expanding area of mixed existing and new uses, with a secondary emergency exit through the adjacent property to the East. D. Adequate utilities; water, sewer, telephone and fire protection exist in the easements on or near the proposed site to service the project. The Montana Power Company will be requested to provide electrical service which is present and adequate in the area. E. This project is in compliance with the R3 Zone use of R-3 Residential Medium Density. Adequate drainage is achievable within the site by directing snow storage and runoff to side yards, with curb cuts and land contours. Carson Place has no control over the canals in the area (offsite), however, the flow lines are such that no problems are anticipated. The site is outside the 100 year flood plain as now designated. The nearest area is the Sourdough stream, approximately 1 1/2 miles east of the site. F. The site is designed to encourage pedestrian and bicycle traffic. The approval of this P.U.D. will allow development within Carson Place to minimize length and number of ' trips to and from services such as groceries and shopping by encouraging pedestrian trips. ' G. Bicycle designated access is provided from Babcock Street, and adjacent projects. Adequate parking spaces to accommodate the handicapped are provided to each unitin the driveways. With the site in relative close proximity to Montana State University,. students are encouraged to use bicycles or walk. Nearby residents will also have this choice. H. State-of-the-art design and equipment for heating and ventilation of the units will be provided, thus keeping energy consumption to a minimum. An on-site well is anticipated 1 and an automatics sprinkler system for landscaped areas will create a cooling effect on the P Y P g entire site, by the evaporative process. I. This project would enhance the existing site, now a mostly unoccupied weed and grass ' field, with a fully landscaped area. There is no known special geologic features of historical significance at the site. The existing bushes, weeds and other debris will cleaned out, enhancing the view from Babcock Street, 13th Avenue, and nearby areas. ' J. The character of the design will be transitional between the commercial look of the B2 area of West Main, and the residential nature of areas to the North and East, softening ' somewhat the visual experience when walking through on the pedestrian ways as well as the passing view. K. The approval of this P.U.D. will allow the construction of some essential affordable housing to the further development of this area as it was intended. The development of Carson Place will encourage more of this type of housing which will be healthy and ' progressive for Bozeman, providing housing and positive growth incentives for Montana State University and the entire Bozeman area. ' L. This proposal is in keeping with the "intent" for which this R-3 Zoning District was created. ' M. Development of this site is deemed to be a reasonable logical pattern of medium density residential use, in a R-3 Zone, which is bounded by existing commercial uses to the North and the residential areas to the South and West, to fit well with the intent of the ' Bozeman Master Plan, mutually benefitting all parties. i COMMUNITY DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA ' DEVELOPMENT GROUP ALL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. ONE REQUIRED CRITERIA 1. The project will enhance the environment of the site and the adjacent properties with state-of-the-art building design and landscaping features. The existing unoccupied weed and grass site would be fully landscaped to surround and blend with the transitional character of the project. The orientation of the buildings will be North and South to serve as an extension to adjacent lot developments. With the individualized landscaped buffer zone surrounding the project, the development should have minimal visual impact. 2. A preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted for Carson Place assuming all traffic enters and exits using the access of Babcock Street and/or to 1lth Avenue because only 141 trips per day will be generated at completion. Construction of the project does not significantly affect the existing or projected level of service. 3. The Development Review Committee, reviewed the submitted "Concept Plan" informal P P meetings have been held with members of the Planning Department and every effort has been made to insure proper procedures and applications were adhered to and prepared for the submittal process. 4. The goals and objectives of the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan were taken into consideration and followed where applicable. 5. The proposed Carson Place fronts on Babcock Street where all public utilities are available for hook up. Interior asphalt parking/driveway areas and concrete curbs conform to the City of Bozeman Standards for thickness design. 6. Wastewater flow from the project will average less than four (4) gal/minute. This will have minimal impact on the two (2) - ten (10) inch sewer mains located on the property, which if installed at minimum grade can handle over 900 gal/minute. 7. A six (6) inch water main exists on S. 13th Avenue and an 8" main is on Babcock. The City of Bozeman approved the plans and installation for this volume of use. ' 8. Power will be provided by Montana Power Company to adequately service the project. 9. From the Traffic Impact Analysis done for Carson Place, it is shown that the traffic generated by this project will be a relatively small percentage of the traffic already existing or projected on the adjacent and area streets. The project will cause no immediate traffic problems. 10. Adequate emergency access and egress are well provided by the use of adjacent property for right of way for extension of South 13th Avenue. ' 11. Since the development must meet the P.U.D. Standards, more than adequate security lighting will be provided. ' 12. All irrigation canals, streams, etc. are located off of the boundaries of the proposed development. The.Farmers Canal is a private irrigation canal owned and maintained by ' the Farmer's Canal Company. 13. No sites of natural or geological hazards or unfavorable soil conditions have been ' identified within the proposed development area. 14. A majority of the existing weed and grass field will be replaced with a fully landscaped ' area. 15. There is no known existing wildlife habitat area on this site. 16. The proposed project is not located within any locally designated Historical District or included any locally-designated landmark structures. 17. The building area encompasses less than 20% of the total site acreage and meets all Master Plan Objectives for density of development. 18. The energyefficient living units will provide a clean air establishment meeting all g P g applicable local, state and federal quality standards. Dust will not be generated from the fsite since all areas will be landscaped and asphalted. 19. All water quality standards will be met from the proposed project. Surface drainage and runoff will be filtered and percolated on site through vegetated areas. An.area in the garages for solid waste, containers will be taken to the curb for pickup. There will be no discharge of any hazardous wastes. 20. Noise levels from the proposed use will have little if any impact to the surrounding area. ' Vehicular sounds will be inhibited by the buffered landscaped area. 21. The proposed project will not produce any known heat or glare. An automatic sprinkler system within landscaped areas will minimize any heat reflected from the asphalt parking areas during hot summer hours. ' 22. The project, with its proposed use, will not cause any known vibrations to the area. 23. The landscape plan and the lighting fixtures will reduce light form the exterior lighting to adjacent public streets. 24. All sanitary sewage will be sent through a gravity service line to city mains where it is transported to the Bozeman Wastewater Treatment Plant. Solid waste disposal will be picked up at the designated curb or each lot and transported to a local landfill by the ' servicing agency. 25. The proposed project is located in an older area of Bozeman. The site is unusually ' narrow and long, making its development difficult for anything except this one proposed. The buildings have been oriented to enhance circulation and minimize the area of pavement. Layout of the landscaping incorporates several species of shrubs and trees to ' provide variety during the changing seasons. 26. See Number 25. ' 27. The intent of the project design is one of transition. Final contour elevations are within approximately four (4) inches of existing. There is no impact to the canals located near ' the site. Surface runoff will be handled on-site using landscaping techniques. Landscaping will encompass 64%'of the total site. 28. State-of-the-art design and equipment for heating, ventilation and air conditioning of the project will be provided, thus keeping energy consumption to a minimum. Vehicular traffic will be able to maneuver with ease due to the parking and access layout. ' 29. The project, being residential will be in use 24 hours of the day. Landscaping is arrange to minimize the visual impact of the development. 30. The buildings have been designed to orient toward the center street of the project with g g P J t ' landscaping along all exterior lot edges. Once residents enter the a main access, they will envision uniquely designed buildings with attractive features, easy maneuverability within the lots, and plenty of room to park or exit the project. 31. Within the site ample room is available for vehicular movement and parking. Driveway and parking area encompasses 27% of the site area. ' 32. Bicycle areas are provided in the garages. Adequate handicapped parking spaces are provided in the driveways. Delivery of materials and goods can be achieved by a ' standard automobile, and United Parcel Service delivery trucks and equivalent. 33. Public recreational areas are provided for in the common open spaces and the pedestrian ' walkways in this project, which connect with walkways through the residential areas to the East and West. Landscaping is to incorporate a new shrub/vegetative understory to further buffer the development from commercial areas. 34. The pedestrian circulation system is an extension of what exists adjacent to the site on the East and West. Sidewalks do not exist in portions of the neighborhood at this time. ■ However, with over 18% of the project to be parking/driveway areas, pedestrians ' walking to the project should not have any restrictions with the traffic within the lot. 35. The development incorporates one major access point to the Babcock Street to simplify ' the circulation patterns. 36. The final asphalt contours keep the drainage runoff away from the buildings while at the ' same time are gentle enough (under 10% slope) for pedestrian safety. Handicap parking stalls are adjacent to each unit so that traffic crossings will not be of concern. The project will be well lighted for security purposed which will also enhance safety after ' hours. 37. The designated bicycle /pedestrian access across the property will interconnect with the ' residential areas East and West. 38. The landscaping to be provided for, at all exterior edges of the lots within the project ' serve to further designate property boundaries and thus visually direct traffic flow and pedestrian use. ' 39. With the transitional character and the profile of the project, the selected landscaping will provide an evergreen effect all year. ' 40. Landscaping will be located along the majority of the project boundary and will be intermixed with a variety of shrubs and trees, to be placed at strategic points along the ' edges. 41. Not applicable. ' 42. All signs in the project adhere to the Bozeman Sign Code, and the development guidelines for Carson Place. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ' DEVELOPMENT GROUP R-3 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TOWNHOUSE 18.50.100.D.6 ' Apn.No POINTS EARNED POINTS APPLICABLE (possible) a.(1) 03 05 ' 15 15 00 08 05 05 ' TOTAL 23 33 ' 1. The project earned 23 out of 33 maximum applicable points for a total to satisfy the P J PP P Y required 23% minimum. 1 1 1 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION 1 1 ' BOZEMAN CITY—COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE CARNEGIE BUILDING - 35 NORTH BOZEMAN P. 0. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 (406) 586-3321 , EXT. 227 (FAX #587-7785) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the Zone Code. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ' 1 . Name and address of property owner: 1= el�ck ,�/Y P hone: o 2. Name and address of applicant: �Oe✓I✓C�1���- /1/1/�fr.Qf�✓/7F�� Phone• S''Zg'f�"�D 3. Name and address of Engineer/Architect/Planner: �/�9,� Phone: hone:: 4. Name of project/development: 5. Address of proposed development: zszo 6. Legal description: gy 7. Current Zoning �-� Land Area 1.9y sq.ft. g� / acres 8. Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary: r • 9. Review Fee: $220.00 (add $40 if property is within Historic Preservation, Conservation, or Entryway Overlay District, and complete and submit appropriate form). This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and 15 copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36". Application deadline is 5:00 p.m. every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant and property owner (if different) before the submittal will be acce ted. I (We) by certi that the above information is true and correc to he be t f my (our) knowledge. pplicant's Signa re Property Owner's Signature ' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST File No. Applicant: Subject Property Address: This checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal . Any item checked "NO" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. Fifteen copies of the site plan drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36" which contain the following: A. GENERAL INFORMATION YES NO N/A 1 . Name of project/development _ 2. Location of project by street address 3. Location (vicinity) map, including area within 12 mile of site _ 4. Name and mailing address of developer/owner _ ' 5. Name and address of engineer/architect, — landscape architect or nurseryman 6. Date of plan preparation and changes 7. North point indicator _ 8. Scale of 1" to 20' , not less than 1" to 100' 9. List of names and addresses of property owners within 200' of site, using last — declared Gallatin County tax records 10. Stamped, unsealed plain legal-size envelopes addressed with names and addresses of property owners described in #9 11 . Zoning classification within 200' 12. Phases of development, if appropriate B. SITE PLAN INFORMATION 1 . Boundary line .of property with dimensions and setback lines of front, rear and side 2. Location, identification and dimension of ( the following existing and proposed data, to a boundary of 100 feet outside of site plan boundaU unless stated otherwise: a. topo contours at a minimum interval of 1 two feet b. adjacent streets and streets r/w to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent to major arterial streets where the distance shall be 200 feet _ ' C. on-site streets and rights-of-way d. ingress and egress points e. traffic flow on-site and off-site _ f. utilities and utility rights-of-way and/or easements (1 ) electric, natural gas, telephone cable television (2) water, sewer (sanitary, treated effluent and storm) g. buildings and structures h. parking facilities, including bike racks i . water bodies and wetlands j. streams and irrigation ditches k. grading and drainage plan, including sufficient spot elevations, storm water detention areas and storm water discharge destination. Detailed basin sizing inlet/ outlet details and discharge calcs will be be required prior to, final site plan y — approval -4 1 . significant rock outcroppings M. sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways n. handicapped accessibility provisions o. fences and walls _ p . exterior refuse collection area and enclosure detail q. location of exterior lighting, including detail and height r. floor plan S. snow removal area t. exterior sign design, including height, size, materials, illumination, security thereof U. landscaping including plantings, ' equipment, botanical and common names, size of plantings at time of planting and at maturity, type of irrigation Detailed information regarding parking, screening and landscape requirements available in Chapter 18.52 of the Zone Code. All landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect or Montana nurseryman for uses requiring more than fifteen ( 15) parking spaces. 3. Number and size of employee and non-employee off-street parking and loading spaces, existing and proposed 4. Site statistics including - -- - site square footage - percent of site coverage (building and parking) I - net dwelling unit density - percent of park or open space 5 . A reproducible copy of the site plan with appropriate signatures (when required) C. BUILDING INFORMATION (ON-SITE 1 . Building elevations of all exterior walls of all structures 2 . Materials to be used ' 3. Height of elevation of lowest floor and location of lot outfall when structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area D. PERMITS 1 . A list of all required and applicable permits and status of applications E. REVIEW FEES 1 . Conditional Use Permit - $220.00 2 . Conditional Use Permit within Entryway, Historic Preservation or Conservation Overlay District - $260.00 NOTE: The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review for compliance with the Bozeman Sign Code. A Sign Permit must be obtained from the City Building Department prior to erection of any and all signs. F III I I i j i PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PRELB11NARY PLAN CHECKLIST 1 1. Document Requirements A. Application Forms included. B. Names are listed on cover sheet to drawings. C. Legal Description is included on cover sheet to drawings. D. (1) List of Property Owners is included on cover sheet. (2) Included. (3) Addressed, stamped envelopes are included herewith. E. (1) through (6) See Statements of Pursuit of Community Objectives Attached F. It is anticipated that all improvements and construction will be completed by 1997. G. Reduced drawings are bound herein. 2. All applicable Site Plan requirements items are included in the site drawings. Those items not included are not applicable. ' 3. Supplemental Requirements A. Viewsheds are described in statements. B. Landscape Plans including all trails (conceptual) included. P g ( P ) ' C. Not Applicable. ' D. Not Applicable. E. Not Applicable. ' F. Conceptual Site Drainage Plan is shown on sheet A-2. F(1), and F(2) are not applicable. G. Not Applicable. H. Preliminary Subdivision Plat is included. ■ ' I. Traffic was analyzed with original and recent subdivision approvals. From that historic data we estimate a maximum of 95 trips per day total traffic impact. ' J. No further studies will be required. 4. Reproducible drawings are included herewith. 1 t 1 t ■ ' File No. PLANNED ;UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PRELIMINARY -FLAN .M ' SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Appl 1 can-Lowell W SPRINGER Residential PUD ' ' ' Project Carson Place Commercial PUD The following is a check i st of submi ttal requi rements for al 1 ' Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plans . The applicant must complete this checklist and submit it along with the items stated for the application to be considered complete. Any item checked "NO" or "N/A" (not applicable ) must be explained in a narrative attached to the :checklist. Upon submittal , staff will review the checklist and determine if the application as submitted is complete. If so, it will be placed on the Development Review Committee (DRC ) and .Design Review Board (DRB) agendas , then subsequently reviewed by the Planning Board . Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant . ' 1 . DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS ' The following information shall be presented in an 8 1 /2' X 11 " vertically bound '; document. The document shall be bound ' so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: YES NO N/A A. Application forms; ! X B. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ' the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the Planned Unit Development ; C . Legal description of the site ; X_ ' D . Adjacent property owners ( 1 ) a copy of the list of the names and X addresses of record of real property within ' 400 feet of the property lines of the parcel of land for which the Planned Unit Development is proposed , exclusive of public rights-of-way; ' (2) the original list shall be included in X 4h the document; XX (3) names and addresses shall be . included : .on stamped _envelopes; it YES NO N/A ' E. A statement of planning objectives , X including : x ( 1 ) statement of applicable City land use o l-:i cJ e-s ' a.p ro •.ob,7ecti,ves,.:.ach_ieyedT_:by - p-roposed plan and how= it=fur=ther-s-the;_t` :_ - ' implementation of the Bozeman Area Master s Plan ( 2 ) statement of proposed o,r,,nershi p of , public and private open space areas and ' applicant' s intentions with regard to future P ownership -of al . or portions of the Planned Unit Development ' (3 ) estimate of number of employees for y, business, commercial , and industrial uses (4) description of rational behind the ' assumptions and choices made by the applicant ( 5 ) the applicant shall submit as evidence of successful completion of the applicable ' Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18 . 54 . 100 , documentation pursuant to } these regulations for each proposed use ; the applicant shall submit written expla- nation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion ; the _> ' Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, evidence that is beyond what is required in that ' section; any variance from the criterion shall be described (6) detailed description of how conflicts ' between land uses are� being avoided or mitigated . 1/ (7 ) statements of design methods to reduce energy consumption , (e . g . - home/business ' utilities, transportation fuel , waste recycling ) F . A development schedule indicating the ' approximate date when construction of the Planned Unit Development , or stages of the , same , can be expected to begin and be com- pleted, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas; G. Reduced versions of all preliminary plan = ' and supplemental plan maps and graphic illustrations at 8 1 /2" X 11 " or 11 " X 17 " size . 1 ! 2 • I ' 2 . SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS - A site plan of the proposed development drawn at a scale of one ( 1 ) inch equals ' one hundred ( 100) feet; eighty (80 ) feet, 6.0-�)= feet' •f i f t y {50:)- feet ..or _fort _ 7,7 (40)' feet and -composed of� -one or more sheets with an outer dimension of twenty-four by thirty-six ( 24 X 36 ) inches, showing the following information : ' YES NO N/A A . Name of project/development; B. Location of project/development by street address; C . Location map , including area within one mile of site; l� D. Name and mailing address of developer/owner ; E . Name and mailing address of engineer/ architect; F . Date of plan preparation ; G. North point indicator.; H . Location of municipal and extra-territorial boundaries within or near the development; I . Listing of specific land uses being proposed ;J . Parcel size(s) in gross acres and square feet; K. Total number , type , and density per type of _ dwelling units; L. Total gross residential density and density per residential parcel ; M. Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size ( Floor Area Ratio, FAR) , with a breakdown by . land use; N . Proposed coverage of buildings and structures for parcel (s ) and total site, including the following the following : ( 1 ) percentage and square footage of building coverage (2 ) percentage and square footage of driveway and parking (3) percentage and square footage of public street right-of-way (4) percentage and square footage of open space and/or landscaped area (5 ) percentage and, square footage of "active recreational use" area O. Number and location of off-street parking , including guest, handicapped , bicycle and ' motorcycle parking , with typical dimensions of each ; . � 3 ! YES NO N/A P. Topographic contours at two-foot intervals , unless differently permitted by the Planning Director, Q Watercourses . Ovate r bod i_es and__JT- r.i_gat i on _ _. .:d-i tches'; ' R. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps S . Unique natural features , s. anificant wild- ' life areas and vegetative cover , including existing trees and shrubs , having a diameter greater than two and one-half ( 2 1 /2 ) inches by species; 1 T. Tentative location and floor area of existing and proposed:libuildings ; U . Boundary and square Ootage of each area ! designated as active recreational use V . Location and acreage :of common open areas and .all public and semi-public land uses , 1 inc.luding public park , recreation areas , school sites , and similar uses ; W. Location of existing And proposed pedes- trian circulation system, indicating the proposed treatment of points of conflict; X. Maximum building height of all structures ; Y. The existing and propbsed circulation system of arterial , cd)llector and local streets , including off-street parking areas ; service areas; loadin? zones; and major ! -points of ingress andlegress to the develop- ment; notations of pr•.oposed ownership, public or private, should beiincluded where appropriate; ! Z . Existing zoning; AA. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the Planned Unit Development, including ! materials and techniques used , such as screening , fences , walls , and other land- scaping ; BB. Prposed signage , with locations and _ illustrative examples ; CC . Adjacent site information 1 Area shown on the site plan shall extend beyond the property lines of the proposal to include a survey of the area and uses within 200 feet of the proposal , exclusive of public right-of-way at the same scale as the proposal and including the following: ( 1 ) land uses and location of principle structures (2 ) densities of residential uses •! 4 ' YES NO N/A (3) existing trees and major features of landscape (4) topographic contours at two-foot inte-r.vals, unless di.ffer._ent.1y_ permitted ,.by,_ - - the'-P1 anni ng .Di rector' ' (5 ) traffic circulation system DD. Supplemental vicintiy map Vicinity map of the area surrounding the site within a distance of at least one ( 1 ) mile showing : ( 1 ) zoning districts (2 ) location of municipal boundary lines (3 ) traffic circulation system (4) major public facilities including schools, parks , trails ,, etc. EE. Attorney' s or owner' s certification of ownership ; FF. Chairperson and Secretary of the Planning and Zoning Board certification of approval of the site plan , including a statement of any variances to the Community Design Objectives and Criteria of Section 18. 54 . 100 ; GG. Owner certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth on = the site plan ; 3 . SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS = A. Architectural elevations Preliminary architectural elevations of all buildings sufficient to convey the basic architectural intent of the proposed improvements ; B. Landscape treatment A general landscaping plan indicating : ( 1 ) treatment of materials used for private and common open spaces ( 2 ) all existing vegetation with identifi- cation of trees by sizes of species = (3) specific proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during and after ' construction (4) the scale shown on plant materials C . Utility plans 7 The existing and proposed utility systems and i proposed utility systems , including : ( 1 ) sanitary sewers (2 ) storm sewers (3 ) water (4) electric 5 YES NO N/A ( 5 ) gas (6 ) telephone lines (7 ) fire hydrants tr.-;ash cola-ecti on ar-eas - -y - - - -D. -Street`-cross sect'idhi§"�'if=-different f*rom,� City standards ; street cross sections schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street , including she propsed width , treatment of curbs and gutters , sidewalk systems and bikeway systems where deviations from the design criteria and standards of the City are proposed ; E. Physiographic data, including the following : ( 1 ) a description of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping (2 ) .. a map showing all permanent and temporary streams and sketch showing the 100 year floodplain for each period as designated in the design criteria as established by the City (3) a description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water table fluctuations and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping F . Drainage plan Preliminary drainage report and A,- tions and/or plan, including : ( 1 ) all watercourses on the property or which are located within 200 feet of the property, must be shown; in addition, the floodways and/or flood fringe areas of these watercourses must be .delineated (2 ) all drainageways , streets , arroyos , dry gullies , diversion ditches , spillways , reservoirs , etc . , which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated (3) all irrigation ditches , laterals, and structures shall be shown (4) all required on-site detention areas , including notes indicating the approximate area and volume of the facility (5) all plans shall indicate the proposed outlet for the storm drainage from the property , including the name of the drainage- - way (where appropriate ) , the downstream conditions (developed , available drainage- -. 6 _ . .... ... ... .. . .. . i w ways , etc . ) , and any downstream restrictions ` a YES NO N/A =, ( 6 ) existing and/or proposed grading plan G. Temporary facilities plan X_ A plan of the site showing the location- of all temporary model . homes , sales offices and/ or construction facilities, including temporary signs and parking facilities ; f H . Preliminary subdivision plat If the project involves or requires platting , i a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to the requirements of the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance shall be submitted; I . Traffic impact analysis At the discretion of the Public Service * { Director a traffic impact analysis shall be _ prepared based upon the proposed development, including the provisions of the approved Master Plan , if part of such Master Plan , and upon surrounding land uses ; the Public Service Director may require the traffic analysis to include the following : 1 ( 1 ) land use and trip generation - a table of each type of land use , the number of units or square footage , as appropriate , the trip rates used (daily and peak hour ) and resulting trip generation (2 ) traffic graphics showing : (a) AM peak hour site traffic (b) PM peak hour site traffic .(c) AM peak hour total traffic (d) PM peak hour total traffic (e) total daily traffic (with site generated traffic shown separately) (3) AM and PM capacity analysis An AM and PM peak hour capacity analysis for all major drive accesses that intersect F collector or arterial streets and all site arterial -arterial collector-collector and arterial-collector intersections within one mile of the site or as directed by the a, Director of Public Service ; (4) Report format shall be as follows: (a) trip generation - using Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (b) trip distribution (c) traffic assignment a (d) capacity analysis , . (e) evaluation (f) recommended access plan , including access points , modifications and any mitigation techniques YES NO N/A (5) Additional Analysis Criteria App.r.opr-i-ate, cl ear.ance . interval s shall be pro vided for each exclusive movement; pedestrian movements must be provided for each cycle and pedestrian overpasses shall not be at inter- sections ; maximum pedestrian walking speeds shall be four feet per second with a minimum "WALK" time of seven seconds ; intersection pavement widths shall not exceed that required ' to provide three through lanes in each direc- tion, dual left-turn :lanes and right-turn lanes. Traffic progression will be of paramount importance ; consequently , all potential inter- sections with signals will be placed on quarter mile points unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Service. Intersection Level of Service "C" shall be the design objective and under no conditions will less than Level of Service "D" be accepted for site operations ; arterial intersections and -turning operations shall operate at Level of Service "C" ; if Level of Service "E" is the result of the study , then alternatives of providing Level of Service "D" shall be analyzed and included as part of the study; ' generally , the design year will be approxi- mately 15 years following construction. ( 6 ) Summary analysis .explaining : (a) the proposed access points for the project,' their location and the rationale for their placement in I terms of circulation ( b) future off-site road improvements X for access , which roads they will be , the projected time frame for z their completion and who is respons- ible for their completion (c) ADT and level of service changes to all streets (d) how traffic impacts to existing streets will be minimized by the I Planned Unit Development (e) describe bicycle and pedestrian 47 pathways within the development, Iif used , i 8 YES NO N/A J . Additional Studies aria Plans The Planning and Zoning Board or City Commission may require additional impact -�- s:tudi es-..or-rothe.r necessary .for -providing=-thorough=conside:rat of the proposed Planned Unit Development; particularly if the development' s compliance with the Community Design Objectives and Criteria is under question; 4. REPRODUCIBLE COPY REQUIREMENTS In addition to the above document, Site Plan and Supplemental;; Plan requirements the applicant shall submit the following for. review purposes: A. One full size rolled :::(not folded ) mylar of all plans and - renderi:ngs B. One 8 1 /2" X 11 " clear film reduction of all plans and renderi:hgs for reproduction and overhead projector use. * Reference to 18. 54. 060 "Preliminary Plan Submittal Requirements" of the Bozeman Interim Zoning Ordinance (7/02/90) . 1 ff y ALL DEVELOPMENT I, ii A p p l i c a t i o n I, All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against , and comply with , the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory "All Development" group. Raq u i recJ C r i to r i a = Yes No NA Neighborhood Compatibility 1 . Is the development compatible with, and sensitive to the immediate (� environeent of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods relative to architectural design; building bulk and height, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the FX site and visual integration? 1 2 . Is the project designed so that additional traffic generation beyond what may be approved for permitted uses does not have a significant adverse impact on adjacent and surrounding development? 3 . Have tie guidelines outlined in Chapter 18.51, Development Review Committee, been followed concerning identification and discussion of impacts related to the proposed development? 4� 4 . Is the development in accordance with the adopted elene�ts of the Bozeman Area Master Plan and its accompanying goals, objectives and policies? Public Facilities, Services and. Transportation 5 . Does the. develocnent comply with all City design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: w er Supply Trails/talks/Bikeways ::.;itary Supply Irrigation Companies Fire Protection Electricity. ''ood.Hazard Areas Watural Gas le'eohone Storm Drainage Cable Television Streets i 6 . Will the sewage generated by the development not exceed the sanitary sewer Lsystem' line and treatment capacity? 7 . Will an adequate water supply exist to serve the development? 8 . Will an adequate electrical power supply exist to serve the development? 9 . Will the City Transportation Plan be capable of handling the development's 1 traffic generation? L_e 1 0 .Does the development provide adequate access for emergency service? 1 ALL 0EVELOPMENT Req u i reel C r i to r i m = Yes No =NA 1 1 .Are ail vehicular use areas and exterior building areas provideb Pith adeeu- ate security lighting? Natural Resources 12 .Have :-:autions been talien tc V nimi,e ' taros tc life or prope :! due to I_ irritation canals, stream channels or other water bodies? 13 .Nave kr:own areas of natural or geological hazard (e.g. , unstable cr potenti- ally unstable slopes, faulting, landslides, rockfalls, flood, and wildfire, etc.) or soil conditions unfavorable to urban development had special engineering precautions taken to overcome natural constraints or have these areas been set aside from development? 1 4 .Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? 1 5 .Have special precautions been taken to preserve existing wildlife habitats, natural wildlife food services, or existing places, or are these :reas .� being preserved? 16 . If the proposed project is located within a localll-designated Historical District or includes a local ly-designate-6. lanamark structure, is tie pro- I- iect in conforr.ance with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinan,e? 17 .If the development is proposed on existing agricultural land or op-En space, . does it meet Master Plan objectives for clusteripo development? ' Environmental Standards 1 8 .Will the project conform to applicable local, state and federal air quality standards, including, but not limited to: odor: dust; fumes or gases which are noxious, toxic or corrosive; suspended solid or liquid partic°:s; or l any air contaminant which may obscure an observer's vision or imtair breath:ne? I L 19 .Will t',,e project conform o aocii cab Ia l :al, state and federal .:ter reality ' 1 standards, including, but not limited to: erosion, and sedimentatic-: runoff control; discharge of solid wastes; and :scharge of hazardous s6:::aces? F. 2 0 .Can the proposed land uses and activities be conducted so that noise gene- rated.shall not exceed the minin�m performance levies as specified in, the City's noise control ordinance Section 1"'.50 of the Zoning Code? Ietailed j plans for the elimination of objectionable noises are required bell-re the issuance of a building permit. 21 . If the proposed activity produces glare;or heat, whether direct or refle:ted. i is the operation conducted within an enclosed building or with other effect- ive screening in such a manner as to nak'e such glare or heat completely imperceptible from any point along the property line? Detailed plans for the elimination of glare or heat are require1d before issuance of a bldg. permit. 'i o- i ALL DEVELOPMENT Raq u i r-ad C r i t@ p i a = Yes No NA j22_ will tie project:-cause an inherent or recvrr�ng gene ated���br., a� i instruments at anyRpo�nt a onq fifie pro perty to: enp8ra�y .const�.� .ron_eay-be'excluded`from -th'i-s--cfTt rion. 23 . Is the :erior lighting, exce;t for .t .;r;, eme :y or tra s 9nals, : 1nsta;led in such a manner that the light source is cDscured to prevent i excess -+e 91are on public streets and walkways or !nto any res-.dential area? The installation or erection of any lightins which Pay to confused ;I with warning signals, emergency signals or traffic signals shall not be permitted. 24 .Will all sewage and industrial wastes be treated and disposed of in such a manner as to comply with applicable .local, state and federal standards? Detailed plans for waste disposal are required before issuance of a build- ing,perPit. =i Site Design 2 5 .Are tt:: elements of the site Dian (e.g. buildings, crculatior, :cen soace 1 _ a , - are r .and le-:scacin etc,) arranged on the sire so that _ctiv ��e� ... inte- grate. with the organizational scheme of t"e c:,r%mrly ana nei;storeood? 26 .Are the elements of the site plan (e`g. buildings, c-1rcul3tion, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to prc-d:;ce an efficient, funct;esally organized, and cohesive planned unit development? a 27 . Is the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings circul!tion, open space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the exist- ing natural topography; natural water bodies and water courses; existing vegetation; and 2 3 .roes desist, and arrangement of elements of the site Dian (e.g., building o constU:::ion, orientation, and placement; tr!rsportat;on netwcrks: selec- tion elacenent of lanosra­ nateriai_, .Dear -_: cf r_r•e�:. - . .ergy source:. etc,) contribute to th,e oieraii re;actior; :` enercy u:e Gy the project? 2 9 .Are the elenerts of the site plan (e.g. buildings, c!rculation, open scace ` and .lantscaping, etc,) designed and arranged to naxin:ze the privacy by the res dents of the project? ' 3 0 . Does the design and arrangenent of buildings and open space areas contribute .= to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and is at leash thirty (30) percent of the project, exclusive of lard sett;acks and parking = s> lot int:rior landscape, developed as open space? 31 .Does the street and parking systen provide for the s000th, safe and conven-ient K—.eoent of vehicles both on and off the site? : ? — y ALL DEVELOPMENT � - Raq u i red C r- i to t- i a = .Yes No NA 3 2 .Does the development satisfythe parkin capacity requirements of the City 9 y Q y and provide adeouate space suited to the loading and unloading of persons, materials and goods? 3 3 . Is the active recreational area suitably located and accessible to the resi- dential units it is intended to serve and is adeouate screening provided to ensure privacy and Quiet for neighboring residential uses? 3 4 . Is the pedestrian circulation system designed to assure that pedestrians can >< move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area? 3 5 . Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this developnent will 4 not becone an isolated 'pad' to adjoining development? 3 6 . Does the pedestrian circulation, system incorporate design features to enhance � s convenience, safety and a,;nit, across parking lots and streets, includinc, but not limited to, paving patterns; grade differences, landscaping and lighting? . i s 37 .Does the pedestrian and bicycle trail system adequately connect to the systems in adjacent developments?: 3 8 .Does the land.s:ape plan enhance the aboearance of vehicular use, open soace ' and pedestrian areas which contribute to their usage and visual appear- ance? 3 9 .Does the landscaping plan enhance the building(s)? 40 . Does the landscape plan screen utility boxes, parking areas, loading areas, ' trash containers, outside storage areas, blank walls or fences and other areas of low visual interest fromi.roadways, pedestrian areas and public view? I4 1 . If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, has provisions been made in the site plan to avoid _. interfering with public access to that area? k 42 .1i11 all signs in the project be in compliance with the provisions of the Bctenan Sign Code? r 1' 1 1 U 2 RES = � ENTIAL A p p 1 i cat ion = _.. Planned unit dove 1 opments:i n_ res den,ti a ]— ar-eas may i nc l,ude a - < variety of housing types , _desa:fined to p 7Ance� _env� r:onment, =.conserve e'ner -- . �—, :� ,. — gy ;. --recognize=:--and-; -.'to the extent possible , preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods with provisions for a mix of limited commercial development . Commercial development must be sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood . Req u i r*3d C r-i to r-i a = Yes No NA Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered 'yes' and iepleaent- ed within the development plan, 1. On a gross acreage basis,- is the avers "e density in the project' at least 9 9 � 9 y P three (3) dwelling units oer acre (calculated for residential portion of ' the site only), or at least (1) dwelling unit per acre where septic tanks are to be used? ' 2 . Does the residential project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g., pri- vate yards, patios, and balcor:es, etc,) for use by the resiee-ts of the project which are sufficient in site and have adeouate light, sun, ventila- tion, crivacy and convenient access to the household unit they are intended to serve? i 3 . Does the residlential project provide for outdoor areas for use by the resi- dents as recreational; active or passive, activities? 4 . Does the residential project encourage the juxtaposition or mix of uses? 5 . Is the residential project within 2000 feet of an existing or approved neighborhood service center, public school, child care center, major employ- center, or public neighborhood or community park? It 6 . Is the resi e.^.tial project wit%in 4000 feet of an existing or aypreve^ community/re: onal shopping center? 7 . Is the residential project within 6,10 of an existing collector or arterial street? 8. If the residential project is proposing a density bonus above the density I that is allowed, does the prcposed project exceed the established design: I standards for the deMelopment and ensure compatibility with ad;acent nei9h- ' borhood developaent? JX 8 . If offices or coanercial deve'oenent are proposed within the residential eroject is less than twenty 12N percent of the P.U.D. designated to be used for offices or comnerciai activities? 1 P y. 2 RES2DENTIAL Rc3qu i red C r i 1-- 6 rr i a : Yes -No NA - 10_:If ce�r.ercial .development rs proposed rrthan the residential project is less that f-if, (50; Descent of_the ear..ket reo red torsuoport theco�nmerci;al - 'uses proposed located outside the P. er,d are of a' service that does not require drive-in facilities or justification for through traffic. t 1 1 . If the project contains commercial developRer,: is the project located at the intersections of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets? r< 12 . If the project contains commercial developrent has the project been sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrisentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood and has it been developed at a scale compatible with residential development? t r i l? I 1 i 1 1 1 I � 1 1 1 ' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 1 BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE ' P. 0. BOX 640 BOZEMAN, MT 59715 (406) 586-3321, Ext. 227 ' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION -------------------------------------------------------------/----- Major Subdivision _&4Fd.r,) Name of Development Minor Subdivision / 1. Name and address of property owner: 2. Name and address of applicant: ZCZ 3. Name and address of representative: ^� _ 4. Location (legal) T,�:V,.7 6?5�=Z,4'4/0 41Z 2-A415Av yZ, �5V Common address• 'eI✓�.e Ir*c 7-6 5. Total Acres: �?2tL��� Total Number of Lots: f�_ ' Gross: ea,/zL Net: -�� f,45? 6. School District: _ Fire District: ' 7. Date of Preapplication Approval: 8. Indicate the proposed use (s) and number of lots or spaces in ' each : Residential, single family Residential, multiple family (specify) ' Planned Unit Development (No. of units) Condominium (No. of units) Recreational or Second Home . Mobile Home Park Recreational Vehicle Park Commercial or Industrial —L Other (Please describe) (�B�yfjyjD/tl/fti ' 9 . Current land use: Existing zoning or other regulations: '40' i� 3 ' Depth to ground water: 'alp Depth to" bedrock, etc. : 10. I (we) state that I (we) am/are the applicant(s) of this appli- cation and that the foregoing statements and answers herein made and all data, information, and evidence herewith submitted are in all respects, the best of my (our) knowledge and belief, true and rect. pplicant's Sign ure . Owner' s Signature l Applicant' s. Signature Owner' s Signature Date: 2 .,�' ��,p ..' •�: ti y� . .. � � ' H 'i r°„ 1 �y �,� A .. � .. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEENT AN,D PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTALS FOR CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES A NINETEEN - UNIT TOWNHOUSE P.U.D SPRINGER GROUP Mary Francesca Palffy VICINITY/ZONING MAP ARCHITECTS %H.A.Bolinger(Box 1047) 201 SOUTH WALLACE Bozeman,MT 59715 BOZEMAN,MT 59715 (406)585-2400 + Carol J. Gray bill 1328 W. Babcock LEGAL DESCRIPTION Bozeman,MT 59715 A tract of land located Robert&Ruth Goodell in the E 1/2 SW 1/4 of 1336 W. Babcock r Section 12,'I'2S,R5E, Bozeman,MT 59715 M.P.M., Gallatin County, Montana Dwight E.Richard - 1320 W. Babcock Bozeman,MT 59715 STREET ADDRESS ..�.r Eva A.Kenney +M+� 1404 W. Babcock ar 1+ 1304 W. Babcock. Bozeman,Montana 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715 OWNEWDEVELOPER Heritage Condo Assoc. %John French Jr. wa at. 218 Pioneer Drive Don Bockhahn ❑ 1500 Mountain Goat Road Bozeman,MT 59715 IAaeoe% ST. Bozeman,Montana 59715 Kathryn H.Conser LIST OF OWNERS 1216 W. Babcock Bozeman,MT 59715 Lex Parlova Lee Woodriff Marci-L. Cordial,et al I 1304 W.Babcock Buckeye Associates 159 Creekside Bozeman,MT 59715 Half Moon Bay,CA 94019 Ralph&Marian Challender Mike Steiner 222 South 13th 304 South 13th Bozeman,MT 59715 Bozeman,MT 59715LI James E. &Marlene'Short 221 South 13th - - - - - - Bozeman,MT 597Y5 ATWT S. Jarvis&Sue Anne Brown 305 South 13th Bozeman,MT 59715 Janet D. Bertino 309 South 13th Bozeman,MT 59715 i t i i i i 1 1 1 I � ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT INTRODUCTION Carson Place is proposed as a 19 unit townhouse subdivision on a 1.91 acres with 80% of the land area as open space, of which 79% is landscaped. Development mechanism is a standard Preliminary Plat application together with a Zoning Planned Unit Development (conditional Use Permit) application. the Preliminary Plat shall be processed concurrently with the PUD. This single family townhouse development meets the intent of the Zone Code/Subdivision Regulations by providing a density within the developable limits. Existing city sewer and water mains to the property are proposed to be extended to serve the subdivision. The Owner, Donald Bockhahn, desires to build an attractive, yet affordable, development of single family townhouses. Plantings of street trees, a future extension of developed trail system, and open space are some of the amenities that shall be provided. ' In total, we believe that this Preliminary Plat of Carson Place represents a thoughtful, sensible, affordable alternative development in general conformance with local regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A-1: SURFACE WATER AND WATERSHEDS Since the site is entirely surrounded by the City of Bozeman, the site already drains into the City storm drainage system. Any additional runoff (post-development) will be detained at the north end of the site and metered into the City storm drainage system along Babcock at the determined pre-development rate. (See calculations on sheet A-1 of the P.U.D. conditional use application.) A-2: FLOODPLAIN ' The lowest elevation at Carson Place Townhouses is above and outside of the delineated Bozeman area floodplain boundary. A-3: GROUNDWATER ' From an examination of a groundwater map of the are prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey and first-hand experience in the area, depth to first groundwater within the proposed building sites is 5'-7'. Groundwater depths are thought to be highly variable, but should not be affected by the proposed development. Retention of storm water drainage is designed to minimize erosion and there should be no degradation of groundwater as a result of developing Carson Place. t . A-4: AREA WELLS There are no known active wells in the area as all dwelling units surrounding the area are on ' city water for domestic use. B-1: GEOLOGY The geology of this site, like all of Bozeman, is tertiary strata, predominantly fluviatile deposits. "A high bench-like fringe of alluvial fan and stream channel deposits skirt the Bridger and Gallatin Ranges." There are no known geologic hazards associated with this site, other than its inclusion within Seismic Zone 4. it is subject to Seismic Zone 4 construction standards as is the entire Bozeman area. (Seismic Zone 0 having the least earthquake potential, Zone 4 being the greatest.) B-2: SOILS The soils at this site are primarily Silty Loan series occurring over most of the site with a groundwater depth of 5'-7' and overall soil depth of six feet to gravely strata. The silt loan is relatively stable having generally low strength, moderate shrink-well potential and slow permeability. ' Based upon our past construction experience nearby with site to the north, we recommend standard construction practices as they relate to home construction and road building. Practices normal to the City of Bozeman will be adequate to overcome the site limitations with regards to soil strength and shrink-swell potential. B-3: SLOPES/TOPOGRAPHY There is no slope or topography feature other than a natural swale down the center of the property flowing from south to north (Babcock) and a general planar tilt to the north. There are ' no rock outcrops on this site, and the land generally trends from south to north. The site has no slopes greater than 15%. Generally, a slope of 5-10% exists across the building site and will not pose any development constraints. C: VEGETATION ' The site is vegetated with native and introduced grasses and shrubs. There are no known endangered or threatened flora at this site. D: WILDLIFE There is no seasonal or transient wildlife use by white-tailed deer, coyote, fox or migrant birds in this area. It is not winter range for big game species, and thee is no habitat, food or nesting cover for eagles. Carson Place development will have no impact on wildlife species and habitat. ' E: HISTORIC FEATURES There are no known cultural or historic features at this site. F: VISUAL IMPACTS/VIEWSHEDS There are no areas of high visibility on the site which are visible off the site. Adjacent properties include a similar land use, although 63% of this property will be preserved in open Ispace. The open space will have seeded and planted vegetation. Looking onto the site, the development will not block any views. The Homeowner's Association covenants shall have standards that require homes blend with their surrounding buildings and are well and uniformly maintained. COMMUNITY IMPACT 1 G-1 WATER FOR THE SUBDIVISION Domestic water will be supplied by extension of city water mains which are adequate in the area to provide sufficient quality, pressure, and flow rate. G-2: WATER FOR FIRE PROTECTION Domestic water will be supplied by extension of city water mains which are adequate in the area to provide sufficient quality, pressure, and flow rate. H: SEWAGE DISPOSAL The subdivision will be served by extending the existing city sanitary sewer system by connecting to the existing sewer mains which cross the site in two places. (See layout on preliminary plats Sheets A-1 and P-1) The mains in the are adequate to handle the unit's ' proposed. I: SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 1 The City of Bozeman can adequately provide trash collection service to the development. All solid waste generated by this residential development shall be placed in the Bozeman Landfill. ' Additionally, private collection agencies are available to residents as an alternative to city services. ' J: ROADS Primary access to the site is provided by W. Babcock Street a paved road/street maintained by ' the City of Bozeman. W. Babcock Street abuts the south boundary of the subject property, but will have minor effect on the development. ' From an overall transportation point of view, the area is bounded by W. Babcock on the north, with E. Main Street further to the north and South 19th to the East as shown on the site plan. ' The area consists of parcels of fully developed land incorporated in the City of Bozeman being primarily residential subdivisions with some commercial development along Babcock and W. Main. ' EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ' See Traffic Study. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ROUTES ' There is a designated pedestrian rail extension within the development for future extension from east to west through the center of the property. (See site plan.) 1 ' TRANSIT SERVICE Transit services in Bozeman are provided by a Montana State University supported system, the I Bobcat Transit System, and various private contractors serving special users (typically the elderly, disabled or disadvantaged). The Bobcat Transit currently extends west past proposed development area. ' COMMITTED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ' See Traffic Study. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' The proposed development included 19 single family townhouse lots together with a 640' P P P Y extension of 13th Avenue connecting to Babcock Street. All interior driveway and parking areas ' shall be paved and curbed to Bozeman City standards. ' J-2: DRAINAGE PLAN See Site Plan and Environmental Assessment Item A-1. ' J-3 SNOW REMOVAL STORAGE AREA 1 Dedicated snow storage areas shall be able to accommodate storage of snow from the driveway and parking areas at each driveway. (See Site Plan.) ' K: UTILITIES The site is served by Montana Power Company, US West and TCI Cablevision. All new ' utilities are proposed to be placed underground within the development. L: FENCING Does not apply to this project. ' M: EMERGENCY SERVICES The project is served by the Bozeman Fire Department, Bozeman Police Department, Gallatin County Sheriff's Department, Halls Emergency, Inc., and Bozeman Deaconess Hospital. N: SCHOOLS Based on conversations with Gary Griffith, Maintenance Supervisor for Bozeman School District #7, it is clear that the School District is undergoing difficult transitions in accommodating the ' growth within the district's boundaries. This development would contribute 10 school age children at full buildout (equal to 0.5 students per household). The cumulative impact of developments within the district have created the need for the district to construct two new ' elementary schools in the recent past and to float a bond issue to fund the new middle school and begin construction which will be finished this fall. ' In order to address the needs of the Bozeman School District, school officials have considered, along with County and City officials, a system of impact fees to fund needed improvements including expansion of the school district's facilities. At this point in time no the impact fee ' structure imposed by the city does not adress the costs shown below. The county is still in the process. The following financial impacts are presently being borne by the district: $8,000 per elementary school student $10,000 per middle school student $12,000 per senior high school student ' Usingthe district's student generation figure of 0.5 students per residential dwelling unit the g g P g ' average cost to the district is $5-,000 per unit. At this time those impacts are addressed through the higher accessed taxes of improved property. O: LAND USE ' The current use of this property is vacant storage and residential. Carson Place will change the land use to residential townhouses with 52% open space. The surrounding area consists of a mix of residential subdivisions, apartments and commercial uses. There appears to be no need to ' mitigate the development of the proposed land for residential use since it does not conflict with the neighboring uses. ' Interior to the subdivision, there will be 19 single family townhouse lots. It is intended that all open space including the easements running east and west across the property will be landscaped with vegetation of grasses, trees and shrubs (see landscape plan) and can be developed by the ' Homeowner's Association for recreational activities. The option to develop the two easemtnets in relation to a pedestrian network in the area will be reserved. 1 ' P: HOUSING ' The owner intends to develop an alternative affordable neighborhood on lots which are a compromise in size for affordability. The housing development shall be strictly controlled through the covenants. The Homeowner's Association Design Review Committee shall have the ' authority to approve maintenance and alterations with the subdivision's covenants. Subdivision buildout is anticipated to occur over a 1 to 2 year period. ' O-l: PARKS, RECREATION AND TRAILS (See site plan.) The open space is set aside for common recreation. A trail through the center ' of the subdivision connects with a possible future pedestrian trail. The proposed trail system also provides a link to the open space in the Subdivision to the east and west. ' The trail may eventually be 4' wide and surfaced with bark/wood chips creating a serviceable trail system similar to those being installed/repaired by the local trail groups in the Bozeman area. 0-2: STANDARDS OF OPEN SPACE, BUFFERING & LANDSCAPING ' All open spaces are to be kept in a "maintained" condition and could be planned and developed by the Homeowner's Association as a formal recreation playground. All lots shall comply with existing R-3 as modified by P.U.D. designation. ' R: TAXATION This project will subdivide approximately 1.9 acres into 19 single family townhouse sites which are projected to have an average value of$90,000 each. Without development, this tract of land ' generated approximately $120.00 in taxes in 1993. With development the expected tax revenue, utilizing approximate mill levies, is: ' 19 lots x $90,000/lot x 3.86% x 0.41 mills = $27,062 Therefore, it follows that the project could generate revenue of approximately $27,062 per year at full buildout. S-1: LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND APPLICANT'S INTEREST LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land located in the E 1/2, SW 1/4, of Section 12, T2S, RSE, M.P.M., Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows: ' Beginning at a point 30 feet south of a point 660 feet east of the northwest corner of the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, ' M.P.M. at which point of beginning is set an iron pipe; thence running south 660 feet to an iron pipe; thence running west 132 feet to an iron pipe; thence running north 660 feet to an iron pipe; thence running east 132 feet to the point of ' beginning. Applicant's Interest: Donald Bockhahn of Bozeman, Montana, owns 100% interest in this development. S-2: RATIONALE BEHIND CHOICES• PLANNING OBJECTIVES ' Carson Place Townhouse Subdivision is a business venture and an investment in the community for the applicant who is a Montana resident. Donald Bockhahn lives and works as a building ' contractor in Bozeman. He has designed this subdivision with lots sufficient for the alternative affordable townhomes without the future residents feeling overly crowded. In fact, it is Mr. Bockhahn's desire to reduce the number of lots, but cost constraints will not allow. Housing design is obviously important to this owner. Mr. Bockhahn believes that a home needs to be appropriately scaled to the lot size. The building height will be less than 26 feet and have ' an interesting roof design. Energy efficiency will be accomplished through solar efficient orientation to the sun, minimum R-40 insulation in the roof, "Corbond" insulation along exterior walls and high-efficiency windows. ' With regard too ens aceS Carson Place has 80% of the property in open space, of which 79% ' is landscaped open space. Landscaping objectives include weed control, the use of native plant species in the landscaping and native trees in the developed open space. ' In summary, the applicant wants a well-planned, attractive subdivision that contributes to the community and neighborhood. ' T-1: NAMES OF ADDRESSES OF ADJOINERS See list on preliminary site plan (Sheet A-1) and attached typed list. T:-2: STAMPED ENVELOPES WITH ADJOINER'S NAMES AND ADDRESSES ' Attached. U: FLOOD HAZARD EVALUATION This property is exempt as it does not meet the criteria described in 16.24.020.A I I ■ 1 1 1 1 1 i i i i PROPOSED COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 1 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR CARSON PLACE This is a Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions regulating and controlling the use and development of real property, is made effective this_day of March, 1992,by Donald Bockhahn•hereinafter referred to as "Declarant." I. PURPOSE. Declarant is the owner of certain real property('property")located in Gallatin County,Montana,which property is more ..'._.._ _.._.pani;ularly_descnl?ed;as follows: .. _ -:+.�-?ter•=-^•�T• - --.r•. _3 . A trait of land located in the E 1/2 SW 1/4 of Section 12 T2S, RSE, M.P.M., Gallatin County, Montana' ' 2. DECLARATION. Declarant hereby declares that'the property described above, and any part thereof, shall be owned, sold. :onveyed.encunlherccd, leased, used. occupied and ctev loped suhiect to the fr;;owing covenants.conditions. and restr_tions which are sometimes referred to hereafter as the -covenants". The covenants shall nut with the property,and shall be bindingupon all parties having or acquiring an legal ore equitable interest in or title to theproperty, and shall P P g 9 g Y g 9 � inure!o the benefit of every owner of any part of the property.The acquisition of an ownership interest in a unit in Carson Places signifies that the Owner accepts, ratifies and agrees to comply with these covenants. i The townhouses which are governed by these covenants shall be built in phases of varying sizes. No townhouse shall be considered to be subject to these covenants until such time as a certificate of occupancy is issued for the unit, at which time the townhouse will be considered incorporated into the development. The owner shall thereafter be assessed for common expenses and the owner shall have a vote in Association matters, as set forth below. NOW.THEREFORE, Declarant declares as follows: Declarant and all subsequent purchasers, successors, personal representatives, heirs and assigns, must belong to the Carson Place Owners' Association.All owners shall be subject to the covenants set forth herein,which shall also function as the By-laws of the Carson Places Owner's Association. 1. DEFINITIONS. The following terms and phrases used in these covenants shall be defined as follows: a. 'Association" shall mean the Carson Places Owner's Association,or its successor in interest, and shall consist of the owners of the individual townhouses,or their delegated tenants. b. 'Common Elements or Common Areas"shall include all of the common improvements in Carson Place, including the private roadway within the property which provides access to individual townhouses,gates. fences, utilities, those areas around the perimeter of the property which are not included in the deed for individual units, but which are common to all ur^.its,including the grass and trees thereon,as well as all other improvements that are built on,or appurtenant to, the property and available for the use of the Association members. ' c. 'Common Services" shall mean the maintenance of driveways, including snow removal services, utility line maintenance or repair, as well as maintenance of the landscaped areas of the Common Areas. d. 'Owner" shall mean the record owner of a townhouse within Carson Place, including a contract purchaser, but excluding anyone having an interest in a unit as security for the performance of an obligation. e. "Townhouse"shall refer to anv of the individual units within Carson Place, and the real property upon which each individual unit is situated. f. "Association Member"or 'T4ember" shall refer to any townhouse owner or a tenant. provided that the tenant has been dele_ated by the I`•icntber to act in the place of the I`•fember. 4. USE AND ENJOYMENT. Each owner or tenant shall have the right to the quiet and peaceful possession of his or her townhouse,and the appurtenant common elements,subject to the following: a. Authorized use. Only single-family residential use shall be permitted, and no commercial, industrial or other non single-family residential use shall be permitted on or within any townhouse bound by these covenants,except as allowed by local ordinance or zoning regulations. b. Maintenance. Each lot affected by these Covenants,and all improvements thereon.shall be maintained in a clean,safe and sightly condition. Boats, tractors, vehicles other than automobiles,campers, whether or not on a truck, and other recreational vehicles or equipment,shall be stored upon the property for no more than 10 days unless stored in the garage of an individual townhouse.Snow removal equipment,garden and maintenance equipment shall be kept at all times,except when in actual use, within the individual townhouses. Refuse, garbage and trash shall be kept at all times in covered containers,and any such container shall be kept within the individual townhouses,except as necessary for pick-up by an authorized hauler. No grass, shrub or tree clippings or plant waste, scraps, refuse or trash shall be kept, stored or allowed to accumulate on the property. i c. Noxious or Offensive Activities...No noxious-or offensive activity shall be permitted on the property d. Siens. No signs shall be placed upon the property or within any townhouse,except that an owner may permit one realtor's sign to be placed upon the property adjacent to or within an individual townhouse for purpose of the sale of the individual townhouse. e. Common Drive. The common drive on the property shall be a private road at all times, for the use and enjoyment of the owners,tenants and their guests,as well as to allow access by emergency vehicles.No owner,tenant or guest shall be allowed to park any vehicle upon or otherwise restrict passage of any other person or vehicle upon the common .__. driveways - f.,Allerations.:Any owner who desiees'to.chnng'e.the w&Hor appearance of his or her townhouse m am iaay,-including=*'_• ' - " ' ^"" ' painting, new construction or remodeling, shall first obtain the consent of the Association, which shall have the sole ' h M discretion to approve or disapprove such alteration; except that an owner may repaint an individual townhouse using the same paint colors and color schema:without prior consent of the Association. In exercising its discretion. ::.: Association shall aitcntpl. In the extent p,--.:a_.to prescl- e uniformity of dcsi gn. eonsiructiun and paint color on ti:_ :ruperty. and the Association shall liurther attempt to insure that adjoining owners are not adversely affected. In addition, should any alteration affect the structural integrity or bearing capacity of a party wall, no such alteration shall be allo•a ed without the consent o:the owner(s)of the contiguous residence sharing the party wall. g. Animals and pets. The owner or tenant of any townhouse affected by these covenants may keep no more than two domestic pets within his or her townhouse.Such pets shall be kept in strict compliance with all applicable statutes or ordinances governing the control and care of pets, and such pets shall not be housed upon any common areas, nor shall any pets be allowed to roam freely upon the common areas. All animal wastes shall be promptly removed by the pet owners, regardless of whether such waste is found of the owner's lot or otherwise. In addition,any owner of a pet kept in any townhouse affected by these covenants shall be liable for any intentional or negligent damage caused to any person or property as a result of the presence of a pet or pets upon the property. 5. ASSOCIATION AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS. a. Every owner of a townhouse unit in Carson Place shall be a member of the Association;except that an owner may delegate the rights and duties of membership to an authorized tenant. ' b. Each townhouse shall be entitled to one vote in the Association for every matter coming before the Association for a vote. Votes for individual townhouses shall not be split, but an owner may give to another owner or an authorized representative a proxy to represent the owner at any meeting of the Association. c. The members of the Association shall govern the activities of the Association directly,without a Board of Directors, unless 2/3 of the members vote to establish a Board of Directors, in which case the Board shall serve for such period or periods and upon such conditions as the Association may establish.The Association,or the Board acting in its place,shall elect officers,who shall be entitled to carry on the administration of the Association,including execution of all documents necessary to conduct the business of the Association,and shall be further vested with the powers that the Association may, from time-to-lime confer upon the officers.The officers of the Association shall consist initially of a president, a vice president,a secretary and a treasurer.The latter two offices may be combined.All officers shall be elected for terms of one year. d. The Association shall be responsible for the enforcement of these covenants and the maintenance of Carson Place. Unless otherwise required by this declaration,or any amendments hereto,a majority of those members present in person or represented by proxy shall be sufficient to determine any question brought before the association. e. The Association shall meet at least annually to conduct the business of the Association. including the establishment of assessments;ind the awardin,nt maimenalice contracts.as well as anv other busines.e that ma% prOperl;­_nw hef.ire the Associ:oion. In order to condu::am bw incss at an Association meeting. a quorum shall be present. wlti:'.. shall insist of more than half of the owners entitled to cast votes at the meeting either in person or by proxy. At least tan days prior to the annual meeting,or any special meeting,the Secretary of the Association,or such other person as may be responsible for sending notices to members,shall send to each member a written notice of the time and place of the meeting,and the agenda to be followed. f.The Declarant shall reserve the right to establish the date of the initial meeting of the Association,which shall take place within 30 days of the date upon which the third townhouse is conveyed. At the time of the initial meeting of the Association.the membership shall then designate the dates for the annual meetings thereafter. g. Special meetings of the Association may be held upon the request of any of the officers,or of any three members of the Association.Such request shall be submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Association and shall specify the reason for such meeting and the matters to be raised.Only matters set forth in the petition or request may be hrou_eht before such meeting unless 75%of the aggregate interest present agrees otherwise. h.The Association shall,at the initial meeting and thereafter, establish a budget and charge an assessment to the owners for maintenance of the common areas of Carson Place, and for the safety and convenience of the owners. All such assessments shall be due and payable immediately upon the mailing of notice of assessment,and any assessment not paid within thin; clays shall he considered delinquent.The Association shall have the right to suspend the voting rights of any member ' who is dclihquetit in paying such assessments.in addition. the Association shall have.the right to place a-lien apnn the rroper•.c of a any delinquent owner in the manner provider)in the Montana Unit Ownership Act,and such lien may be ' foreclosed in the manner provided therein. Such lien shall be subordinate to any first mortgage upon the individual townhouse. In the event of a sale of the townhouse, the lien shall remain affixed, but in the event of a foreclosure by a lender holding a first mortgage on the townhouse,a foreclosure sale shall extinguish the assessment lien if the foreclosure sale does not produce sufficient funds to satisfy the assessment lien. i.The Declarant shall determine the initial assessments for the Association;provided,however,that until three of the units ..__rtih�-i� �olc � sq .11 muan assessmenLA�ttouesslli�[ ?U�? auJ1S 5.0 94?�' �t _P4 . . .__.__ thtegaintts�niPhasa Lareaold a*rnaJonty;ofahe.owners°ptesent at the_.ttnnual_meeting_i?ripectTl7ne�l!ngrail.d — -- -'�purpose;may�sta6lish the assessments•for the upcoming'year;-in-an`amounrnecessary to•maintatn the'common elements. ''"- '- ' -•--• �-•�• Each owner shall be required to pay his or her proportionate share of such assessment,within the time set forth above. J.In addition t,,the annual assessn cots aulhrn'ized above.the Association may. from time-lo-time.tevv special z.._ssmen:• } for the con�iru:tion, repair or replacement of capital improvements upon the property. Such action shall rcquirc the approval of a majority of those members present and qualified to vote for such assessment. k. Neither the Association,the Board,nor any member thereof shall be liable to any party for any action or inaction with ' respect to any provision of these covenants,provided that the Board and each member thereof has acted in good faith. I.The fiscal year of the Association shall run from January 1 through December 31 of each year. 6. LIABILITY OF OFFICERS. No officer of the Association shall be liable to the Association or any of the members or Owners or any third party for harm,injury,loss or damage suffered because of any action taken or omitted to be taken by him or her while serving as an officer in good faith if: a.The officer exercised and used the same degree of care and skill as a prudent person would have exercised or used under the eircumstanees in the conduct of his or her own affairs,or ' b.Took or did not take action in reliance upon advice of counsel or upon statements or information of other Owners or employees of the Association which he or she has reasonable grounds to believe. 7. ENFORCEMENT OF COVENANTS. ' a. In the event of any violation or threatened violation of these covenants,the affected person or entity, including any Owner or the Owners Association, may enforce these covenants by legal proceedings in a court of law or equity,including the seeking of injunctive relief and damages. In association with such legal proceedings or as a separate remedy, such Owner, or the Owners Association may enter upon the property in question and remove, remedy or abate the violation or threatened violations after first having given proper notice and a reasonable opportunity for the violator to take action to comply with these covenants as set forth below,provided that such self-help remedy can be effected without a breach of the peace or any violation of law. Included within the self-help remedy shall be the right to remove any vehicle kept ' upon the property in violation of Article 4.b.. In the event that any such vehicle is towed,the owner of the vehicle shall be required to reimburse the association for all towing fees and other expenses incurred. b. Notice as required above shall be in writing and shall be served on the person or entity concerned and shall specify ' the violation or threatened violation, identify the property, demand compliance with the terms and conditions of these covenants and ,hall state the action which will be taken under the above paragraph if the violation or threatened violation is not abatc,i. rc Medici) or satisfied. 11 such noifCc ::moot he persralally served alter a reasonable effort to 10"'lic is person or cniin'to be served.servi:e may be had, y posting a copy of such motile al•u runspicuous ph1ce on: , which is the subject of such violation and mailing a copy bf the notice by Certified Mail, return receipt requested,to the last known address or address of record of the violator. The violator shall have 30 clays from the date of posting and mailing of the same, within which to comply with these covenants before any party may engage in self help,abatement, entry or commencement of litigation as provided in the above paragraph; except that if the offending condition is a violation of Article 4.b.,4.c.,4.d.4.e.,or 4.g.,the notice may allow a period of not less than three((3)days to remedy the offending condition before self-help may be utilized. c. No Owner or member of the Owner's Association or Commince shall be liable to any person or entity for any proper ' entry,self-help or abatement of a violation or threatened violation of these covenants and all Owners shall be deened to have waived any and all rights or claims to or for damages for any loss or injury resulting from action taken to properly abate, remedy or satisfy any violation or threatened violation of these covenants. Exception to the above shall exist for loss, injury or damage for intentionally wrongful acts. d. Actual costs, expenses and reasonable attorney's fees connected with correcting, remedying, abating, preventing or removing any violation or threatened violation of these covenants incurred either through litigation,entry or self help shall constitute a claim by the individual Owner or the Owner's Association initiating such action against the Owner of the property which is the subject of such violation or threatened violation. Such claim shall be enforceable through appropriate N } , ,� ,�: ,ti T • � K :i V� .k ��� •;K .'i i 1 .; ':G . � ' �1 ,� ' ,� l t{ t ��y �.}1 � � , A � J Y Y `� ',l yf y ' ✓ r 1 �� J t r i ' .� � : i i 1 ' Court action. 8_. PARTY WALLS. Party walls and the foundations for party walls have been placed between the units located on the ' property,whi=h will be governed by these covenants.Each unit owner.during his or'her ownership of a unit, shall enjoy the right. privilege or easement to use such party wall and foundation for so long as the saute remains standing,upon the following terms and conditions: a. Should the residences on the property described above be so constructed that the foundation or party walls for the same extend over the boundary of that lot and onto the lot of the adjoining unit, the foundation and party wall of such building so extended shall rernain as situated and shall be construed and deemed to be a party wall between such properties so that in the event an encroachment exists,neither party shall be compelled to take down or remove such party wall for so long as the same shall remain standing; and such encroachment shall be deemed permissive,with no adverse or prescriptive _ - rt hF crest d ..encroach 1nthepopertywhich shall suffer the � Y �b. Notwithstanding the effects of Article 9, below, the provisions of this Article shall continue in effect from and after ' the date of the execution of this Declaration and for so long as the foundations and party walls shall stand and shall `< constitute an casement and covenant of record running with the land, for the mutual use and benefit of each lot affected j by this De_laratinn. ' c. Each wall which is built as a part of the original construction of the homes upon the properties and placed on the dividing line hetween'he lots shall constitute a party wall, and, to the extent not ir.eonsistent with the provisions of this Declaration.the general rules of law regarding party walls and liability for property damage clue to negligence or willful t acts or omissions shall apply. ' d. The cost of reasonable repair and maintenance of a party wall shall be equally shared by the owners who make use of the wall, in proportion to such use. e. If a party wall is destroyed or damaged by fire or other casualty,any owner who has used the wall may restore it, and if the other owners thereafter make use of the wall, they shall contribute to the cost of restoration thereof in proportion to such use. Such restoration shall be without prejudice, however, to the right of any such owners to call for a larger contribution from the others under any rule of law regarding liability for negligent or willful acts or omissions. f. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Declaration,an ownerwho,by his negligent or willful act,causes the party wall to be exposed to the elements shall bear the whole cost of furnishing the necessary protection against such elements. In the event of any dispute arising concerning a party wall,or under the provisions of this declaration,each party shall a choose one arbitrator, and such arbitrators shall choose one additional arbitrator, and the decision shall be by a majority of all the arbitrators. Such arbitration shall be conducted under the rules of the American Arbitration Association and the decision of the arbitrators shall be binding upon the parties. i9. AMENDMENT-VARIANCE. Amendments to these Covenants,other than those Covenants affecting the rights of any owners in party walls, may be made upon an affimiative vote of the Owners of at least 75%of the townhouses affected by these Covenants,at a regularly scheduled or special meeting. 10. DURATION OF COVENANTS. All of the covenants,conditions and restrictions set forth herein shall continue and remain in hull force and effect at all times against the property and the Owners and purchasers, except as set forth in paragraph 8 hereof. 11. SEVERABILITY. Any decision by a Court of coPnpetentjurisdiction invalidating any part or paragraph of these covenants shall be limited to the part or paragraph affected by the decision of the Court, and the remaining paragraphs and the covenants,conditions and restrictions therein shall remain in fiull force and effect. t 12. ACCEPTANCE OF COVENANTS. Every Owner or purchaser of a tract within the property shall be hound by and subject to ail""'tile pro:isions of this Declaration and every Owner or purehaser thn ugh his or her purchase or ownership express]\':r_:c;is and consents to the operation a-:J enlorccment of all ol,the prod>ions of this Declaration. ' c a: r ' DATED this_da-:of March. 1994. By: DONALD BOCKHAHN 9 STATE OF MONTA�-A ) w :ss. ' County of Gallatin ) On this_day of March, 1994,before me,a Notary Public in and for the State of Montana,personally appeared DONALD BOCKHAHN, known to me to be the parson of whose name is subscribed to the within insttvment.and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at Montana My commission expires: t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' REDUCED DRAWINGS I 1 LANDSCAPE LEGEND STORMWATER RETENTION CALCS S"A3CL BOTANICAL MAW CM&CN NAAE PI AWFINCI IMAT111E SIZE CTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.7 SURFACE AREA (EKG.) AREA (DEV-) CQ".fFICIENT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL L_ GRAVEPAIANGBUILDING 0 15.090 .95 85 AC6i FUTANODEB NORWAY MAPLE 2'GAL 8+8 50 FT. I 6 1 GRASS 0 0 .20 __.�_ -- ___ - .-_- -_ .-.. _ CRASS 87.200 54,579 .20 ay WEST MAIN ST. (US 191) mm ® FNSYLVAS �N ASH i 1 V7-2' I 50 FT. iD _ RUES STING SITE I SITENOFF C•.462 V F9l81'LVANCA GAL B+8 �-� DEVELOPED SITE-C=.462 O .AAMAF49 FOLIA I I ________________ _ L__-__________..___________ _ J (Ox.95)4(O..B$)f(.0113 ..20)-.200 (17.090x.95)+(t 5.•u,.85)-(5<.379..2U)-.462 CWI TAIJARB�� TAM,X►lPgi 1!<-YC 3 FT. 150 87.083 �. 1� I. - -10 YR.STORM N. _ R- 10 YR.STORM PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF DEVELOPED SLOPE SITE I% I R#M1B X CISTERA PUFRE LEAF PUN 2'GAL B+8 8 F7. 15 ( ' SITE ELOPE IX I � TRAVEL DISTANCE-630' TRAVEL DISTANCE-630' - 1 , ..42.200 (PER NR22) 9TC) C-30 N (FIIGOPED IS) C T.30 MIN.(FIG.22) ____ ..-.._-..-..-.•..-..--.-.-.•- T�:42 MIN.(FIG 22) < SETBACK AREA.40.081 S.F. SITE CALCULATIONS _ BABC 6 . 1 _�_____ _ .41 IN PER I r I ! -PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF I5: TOTAL AREA-97,083 SF. AREA 7.OF TOTAL I ✓I. . a•.I �I��!I o.aA 4 TJ-L� I I +.2ao(.41)r•,�^'1..16 CFS -EXISTING RUNOFF TOTAL AREA MKS SETBACKS 47.002 SF. 100% i !i-, OFF IS: -i �_ ��`�� DEVELOPED RUNOFF 15: OPEN AREA A:WI)S SETBACKS 29.912 SF. 64% I - _ _________ .46 ( rt .38 CPS -DEVELOPED i�..-.._-._________-- f_ g_sr_ _ __-_�_ 2 .41) non RUNOFF I ` LAPDSCAPE AREA MWS SETBACKS 14.488 SF. 31Y. F--- �1 �: NI r_ 1 LA{`DSCAPE AREA WRH SETBACKS 54.579 S.F. 63% ( I -I �•.•, EMI !.REOU82ED RETENTION VOLUME O.16 CFS RUNOFF(EXISTING) _ ICHEOUAMEGONI; s TIMEH Z PAVED AREA 15.4t4 sp. 'I .. ' VALLEY OF - LICE �I � VILLAGE P.U.D. N� z so ' .16 � neo BUILDING AREA 17.090S F. 36Y. �..--THE FLOWERS ❑7 I I�-� I F c REQUIRED RETENTION VOLUME O.60 CFS RUNOFF(DEVELOPED) O z i TIMEHR I M. wu.rt rt O I � I �-' 2 60 .36 2728 N ja 13 (-.. •n ,_1$EWER ESA',:.' I _-SEWER E 1.0 gI__ _____T_________ .___ ___-fcn -____I 1 Lis REF ADJOINERS ZONING I I CORCORAN'S i NORTH: ❑ MARY FRANCSCA PAEFFY B-2 w 7 C/o H.A.It0T (Box to47) F„I 0 - BOZF3IAK 1rt.U su7171s w WEST SIDE AD61710N I I I I Ill©N- C rkse t�wIBGRAMIL R-3 �l �:: �::J; eoraAlt.WT.W715 Z r l WEST KODi ST. El LUTHER!NELLIE R R-3 Q v _...............L. -. ......... _. ...._......-....--............. .._.__.._...._ ............. Q t BABCOCN � RICNAI6)E DMCM R-3 n a.ram n a oos..y y I md.•m.a wn c� I $ %iy 1 I 1SOZEMAK WT.W715 1 I N 659. 78.27' 4A .00', 22.00' 22.0OJ 22.DO' 22.00' J 37.00' 3h.DO' 22.00' 22.00' 31.62' r31.62' 22.00 22.00' 37.0E`' []17.00' 2.01Y 22.00' 22.00' 36.00' l 5 I ❑5 HERITAGE CONDO ASSOCA710N R-3 S. RENCH _--�_ __+_ _:._ __�___ C/� WT.F59715 JR( 6PIOFETR DRIVE) r--------- ------ -- ------ -- --- 1-- --r`"---- -- ----- ----- ------ --- 1-- --r--- -- --- --- ------ I I •';`� 1 s¢. 1 : :rt EAST �6 KA,1R1N N.DDNgR R-3 1216 IN.BADOOOK I I BOZEYAN,1n:SGns dJ I a I $ r 8 8 r - I I o .�•I I �7 R LEE NOODF6F At ALE705 PNLDVA R-3 HI „ oS' '%;/�''!R•.'/%fQ_ H r o- �frc .r - �'`$ 1. o I H _ I 321 w.ORNR BO Si715 IDIAK r rr1 rr J !r !r'•;% ! 1 rf1 rj% r %l 1 � r r I Jr r tr s I j'..��r if, ,'f 1 r r% ..+' r ✓.J!/. r ,; /F r/,''rr i .4A r r_ " 't�j i I SOUIF! �8 RAIPII AND YAf6Ol W.OVALLD®ER R-3 13TH %S B02ELAK WT.50715 L----- ----- -- % - - -- --- - - -C - -- -- - - ---1 I ER R-3 rlp':' I1tee smaH304 s 13TKII ���2T 36 'I 22 I '1 22 I t 1 3 _V 'I 122 2 1 31 2 31 2'I 22 I 124)0'! 1 3 '1 122 11210 !22 I J6 C I . 8 \ r _ .A - 1 SOUDRIESF 10 NARLEIff SHORT R-3 •S 680. ' 221&13TH SD713 I t9iH AYE • ' IL ' L - T- t -} -- ' II1 II II 71 AND SVE ANNE BROW R-3 3051 1JM I 802ELAN.WT.SGnS _ I I I I I Ip 1 i 12 JANET D.RERT610 R-3 ___l_ ' __-____1J_ _________ ' ___________' _ __-_____-}' ' _____-__-___' .j _L- 1__+ ' _- JOG S 13TH - -�- T�- 1 b I I,_ r I- I _� pl 1 -r_ I I BOZELAK MT.W715 n a•,w.0 I I I I I I I I I I 13 JAIES F.!ALCE T.SARGENT R-3 I I 222 S.141H 8OID1AN.WT.50715 I ( I I �•yl��� 1 p1 EE'I I I I I I I OvskALL�rLm _ �/y I I I I a ROGER!MNA D.MCCORMICK R-3 308 S.14TH BOWMAN,WT.SGnS I 1 I 1 I I I 15 310 i CE Y.PEACE R-3 N 1 I I yII } I TH BOZELAFL MT.W715 00 1 I I) I I I I I I I I I I I _ i 12'•0' 33'-0' 1 T o c 1R ct 0 42'-6• 28'-0' 2'•6• ---------------- z -_-- - k cG .... . . ... . 8-2-96 A NINETEEN — UNIT P.U.D. COMPLEX SPRINGER GROUP, P.C. LAND LW!FLAWNM CARBON PLACE TOWNHOUSES m 6MM wAUAAM.VWM BOZEMAK MWTMA SM BOZEMAN , MONTANA i06SB-bOD L ®1 s ` 2 I_111 Al x �® X I /r - I o a y /J :3 l 1 8-2-% A NINETEEN - UNIT P.U.D. COMPLEX SPIUMER GROUP, P.C. A4 CARBON PLACE TOWNHOUSES 2T SOUni wMlAM AVFNUB BOZD"K MOMMU YM BOZEMAN , MONTANA '06ffiD100 PREAPPLICATION FOR TOWNHOUSE SUBDN 31ON PLAT u ' OF CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT CARBON PLACE TOWNHOUSES �,�"'�PROPERTY OWNERS,AN LOTS. It THAT WE.curgn m E SNYET'ED.aw,ADED AND Puma Wm Ems anus STREETS AND ALLEYS.AS SHOWN BY THE PLAT AND CE MINCI'F OF SURVEY Nm IE7EIMD MOLDED.THE FQIDWrAC DMMM TRACT W LMD,TO-WT: Q p� A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED N THE E 1/2.SIN 1/4.OF SECTION 1Z M a 3 Rg Y.PY.GALLATN COUNTY.MOHTANA E MO PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED' BEING A TRACT OF LAND AS Fa,DWs LOCATED IN THE E 1/Z SW 1/4 OF SECTION 1Z TM USE, MPhil. IEKiIST AT A POINT sD FEET SOUTH T OF A POINT SE TEST EAST OF FIE ��L� � � COUNTY, MONTANA /L NNDRTHWEST CORNER OF THE E 1/2 a'THE sw,/4 6 SECTION 12.tOWNSIP GAL LATiN COUN 1 1, MOT\1 MI A 2 SOUTH.RANGE 5 EAST.YFY AT OD F T TO OF RON W 7 SET AN RON PIPE-TLfl/�RUNNING S71mH 660 FEET m AN NON PPE:TErLi ry RUNNING REST 132 FEET m AN NON PPE: THENCE RIUMIG MOUTH 660 FEET ,_....._......_-. ____.._.....___..__..- TO AN NON PPE.THENCE RINiLC EAST,32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THE ABOVE-OMOMD TRACT OF LAND IS TO IWO AS•CARSON PLACE E 1/2 OF SW,/{ ' ZZ (� TOWNHOUSE SX®NHSIOC,CITY OF DaMLAK GALLATIN CDUN ._ re ro�omT ; NEIY COfbER ff T L�b3 INCLUDED N ALL THE STREET4 AVEIILIF$ .rmw.n aTn -�T�579 �.MH-2 -1 _._ __., +aum[o.on T25,RSE MPY ALLEYS AND PARRS OR PUBLIC SOURIES SHOWN ON SAID RAT ARE __ ' ; THE CITY OF BOgX1AN FOR Ji -... I Lomax THEHEREBYPUBLIC GRANTED AND DONATED m � I Nv.-9A14' MV.-9d46' � I] THE PUaUC USE AND ENJDNMDRT. IJ W NEV 1-i 11 T I I T I ; 'E" .`$ DATED THIS_DAY OF An.19— N 659.43 TPc"�� I I _...J/ �EE£c1wC/IL SERVICE MPC / I I SIDED XIOX 7 27' 4i .W' 2200' 22. 22.00' 22K,o' 37.0�' #7.W' 22.00' 22.OD' J:.C2 3H.62' 22.00' 22.00' ,3•/. I' ��7.00• - .. 2.00' 22.00' 21.0:' 3&00• ( sq. 3 • ----- - -- - -- - - - --- —-- ---- O ! z E I I ' ; I II o I STATE OF MONTANA EaLLa. Em n LED TT uu_m mu-m � � L�tY Lam LIT 1D � =A imi � (a<a ua• r.m 2 WILL I d g = COUNTY OF GAL ATIN F 4052 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2454 S.F.246E S.F. 2464 S.F. (4p1H"A�S.F. 4144 S.F. 4"SF.2454 S.F. 3542 Sr 3542 S.F. 2464 S.F. 264 SF. 41"&F. NM S.F. 2}64 S.F. 2454 Sr. 24"S.F. 4OM S.F. I O z ' $1 "A S.F. g (PHASE 1)- (PHASE g(PHASE 1) (PRASE:� I I) - �1)g - _ (PRASE 1) (PHASE I)� (PNAt>E•+) ci - (PHASE-1 (AXASE g) (PIIASS7 1) (PRASE g PHASE (PHASE o (PHASE B)c ��I � o ram+ WE 1M5_DAY OF NPQ THE rLM BEFORE bON1ALLY APPEARED DONALD O O «1 (PHAg q $ $ I I N II R ' r '�I N I BoanwN.KNOWN m YE m E THE 004M THAT EXECUTED THE NON INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED m M THAT THEY DMJTED THE SAYE A i N WITNESS WERECF.1 HAVE HOOONTO SET MY HAND AM AFFIXED W z ii 9 = I � OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR N THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE=17DL 6 NOTA___ __ -- - lV _____ [22PO' - ____- __ DPUaR FOR IIff STATE OF YOINTANA RESIDIN CO MISSON EXPIRES O 78.27' 36 'I 2 'I 22 'I I 22 137 J7 •I 1 22 22 137 _ 3, 2'I 22 'I 22 •I ; 137 SF �I 22 122 122)YX' 136 \', I CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE r m ..I1• WE,THE UNDERSIGNED NND D M0PrQACEE.DO HEREBY JOIN A CONSENT TO THE DESCRIBED:S 86G , 00' I PLAT.RMEAo r-OUR RESPECTIVE LEPM CAMS OR N ENCUMBRANCES AS TO ANY POR110N OF SAID LAME NOW BEING RATTEDFAIL �•� QI --�---�— —�- —� __ H X i INTO THE IC P��OTHER RIaJC USED AND DEDICATED m THE USE Z F�M ' C ---of I ----- II - ---- I-- - T - ,0• -\-\ i ---- 1 -•- - '-7 _ ____-. H i I cI WATER 60'-O'EASEME TW ( ( N ) H XODOC OOOOOOOOS BANK OF B02FXMAN NEW f FOR BABCOCK T.E5 ENAIN SEWER DIV. rFE+t"l•II zO STATE OF MONTANA 114-3 COUNTY OF GALLATIN --_ I "------- — ____ ` STA 6 I I :sE ER MAN! j .....____................. 1705f.Las•eo ': lu.,,,I... unm`unw. Nv.xM. I ! I ---------3 •--• ------_------- ' STA 7+95, X „a,,,,,p1Nrt r i I . I ON,H6_DAY OF N,HE YEAR aET7RE / V II I N�.yy 26': I xIST.13D_O I %UST.13D-D I I I I YE PERSO NALY APPEARED `� EASEMENT ;I' _ _ KNOWN TO ME OI YE m BE T '11E BANK 11UT; (r EASEMENT EXECUTED THE WON NSTRUMEM AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH BANK EXECUTED THE SAYE ..___.___-_____....._.., IN WTIESS WEREW.I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAD AND AFTOED MY ' OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR N THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE I . I Mf6TiD1 1, I • NOTARY PAT FOR 71E STATE OFYOINTANA ' ENLARGED VICNTY MAP p EXPIRES CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR ................_ ............................................. TIC/HOOL DISTF CT Na 7 L TIE UNDERSIGNED.RON ALLEN,PROFESSIONAL I"SNVET47, DO mmm CERTIFY THAT BETWEEN19—. ' t810R"am BC1tTOL AND 19 I SURVEYED THIS AMENDED SBDIVWOIH AID RATTED SALE AS 31gM1 ON THE ACCOLPAX71NC RAT AND AS DESCRIBED INACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE MONTANA !Ef MN fr.(Us M) SIXXVM AND AM PLATTING ACT.SECTIONS 7/-3-101 TWO" rloan: SCaLE:r'•30'-L• H 76-3-614, M."AND 11E BpgyAN AREA SUBDI SIGN REtiAA710NS DATED THIS_DAY OF AA.19� 1." •FARO RF7RIJR WITH CAP AS NOTED. PROEES9NUL LAID SURVEYOR c SET 5/6' Ill'IEBM WITH CLIP. MONTANA REGISTRATION N0. n DEVELOPER/OWNER GUNKANDRECORDER CFRIIF%d1E OF PLANNING DIRECTOR o Q I I DONALD BOCDHANN DATE FEBRUARY 6.1996 1,SHELLEYOENEY.CLERKAND NS GAWLLATN NTY MONTANA,L 9020IA MT 59715 DO HEREITY CERTIFY THAT 11E FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FLED C AHOY FPPLL RANIIIKX DIRECTOR.OF THE CITY-COIINIY RAIBI/G dj IN MY CFrKZ AT aCLDM(A.M.OR PALZ TITS eAY OF BOARD HAVE R£VEIED THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND FIND MAT �I TOTAL GROSS AREA: U124 S.F. AA 199—AND RECORDED INBOOK—_OF PLATS IT CCINFOR E5 TO THE SUBDIVISION REDUI ELORS OF SECTIONS VALLEY OF ql VWX.A(>E PLC. NET AREA 67,824 S.F. MONTANA. RECdDS OF THE CLERK ND RELgDkR GALLATN COUNTY, 76-3-IM R O THRUGH 715,2 14.&I"AND THE BO®IAN AREA SUBDI i R I k CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS pOCAENT NUMBERS DATED THIS_DAY OF A.D.19DIRECTOR _. �I C MAPHER BETH S THE OfECIOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE.CITY OF BOIDNN4 MONTANA. CIIM AND RFt:ORDER PLANNING DO HEREBY Y CO THAT TIE T+I AT K •IT TDINEIOLMN. f7TY�CNTY RAIMIG BOARD f f O! LDS m THE CITY OF BOID1Aµ GALIJAIIN CODUNTY.YGITANA 6 WIIIIN 11E CITY fi ;;^ .-. o; ALL AREAS W11N THE:AIEI"90N AND OUTSIDE THE INDIVIDUAL OF BOIDNAN MASTER RAN AREA NO CAN E PROVIDED WITH MUNICIPAL J LOTALL AREAS THI 111.E E BDWKON SPACE OUTSIDE THE IN I ID FACILITIES FOR THE SUPPLY OF WATER AND DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE AND CERTIFICATE OF OI ECTM OF PUBIC� THE NINETEEN LnIS SOLID WASTE tHEREFORE UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 76+124(1), CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER L-� THIS TRACT 13 NOT SUBJECT TO SANITARY R6TRICOON CLEARANCE L PHIP FORBES TIE OfELTOR aF P11gJC SERVICE, L STAR HRUCEDO HM33Y R CERTIFY THAT T OF GALLATIN HE ACCOMPANYING PLAY MONTANA, THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS BM DULY EXMNED CERTIFICATE OF INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS OF THE CITY OF BOIILAK YONTANA DO HpF9Y CERTIFY 4 DRIED THIS_DAY a AD.. DULY E LAM/4D MID THAT NO PROPERTY TA1E5 ASSESSED AS BEEN AND NAVE FOUR THE SALE m oonowM m THE LAX - I.THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY APPROVE R,AND HUM ACCEPT THE DEDICATION m THE CITY W THAT BETWEEN 1992 AND 1NZ THE AND LL\FED ON 11E LAND m E SUBQVpED ARE DDNOIIDNT. WZE MAN FOR PUBLIC 115E OF ANY AM ALL LAIRS SHOWN ON REQIIED STREET IMPROVEMENTS WERE INSTALLED N ACCORDANCE THE PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED TO SUCH USE. N r WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS r DATED IM_DAY OF A.M.19_- � IM SERVICE ER THIS—_DAY OF AD.19_- OO OF TREAS RER OF GALLAITN COUNTY _..... _.. .m... T. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE 1 1 1 i i I � � i 1 f 1 i i 1 1 1 i 1 TRAFFIC STUDY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES ! TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 2.1 Existing Roadway Traffic Control 3 2.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes 3 2.3 Transit Service 3 2.4 Committed Roadway Improvements 4 2.5 Existing Roadway Traffic Volumes 4 f2.6 Accident History 5 . 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5 3.1 Trip Distribution 5 3.2 Internal Street Circulation 6 3.3 Non-Vehicular Trip Impact 6 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 TABLE OF FIGURES AND LISTS Figure 1 Study Area Location Map 2 Table 1 Street Characteristics Within the Study Area 3 Table 2 Average Daily Traffic Volumes - 1991 4 Table 3 Trip Generation 5 Table 4 Trip Generation 6 ! 7 I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CARSON PLACE A 19-UNIT TOWNHOUSE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Carson Place Twonhouses is proposed to provide 19 single-family townhomes in an existing resident/apartment area along W. Babcock. The site is in the Bozeman city proper. The project is proposed to begin construction in 1994 with occupancy beginning in mid-1995. 1 This traffic impact analysis assesses potential transportation impacts of the development and concludes with no recommended mitigation measures for the traffic system. The analysis is organized into five section as follows: Section 2.0 provides a description of the existing traffic system in the study area. Section 3.0 describes the proposed development and the projected traffic generated directly from this development. Recommendations are summarized in Section 5.0. 1.1 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology The traffic analysis methodology is tabulated below: ' • evaluate existing traffic conditions in the study area • estimate trip generation from the townhouse subdivision for both daily and peak hour trips ' • distribute volumes (assignment) onto the roadway network based on the Bozeman Transportation Model • summarize impacts to the roadway network (no recommended changes) 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area is served by West Main, Babcock Street and West Main Street, as shown in Figure 1. ' The study area generally consists of residential area, with a concentration of business/retail use along West Main Street. Characteristics of streets service this area are summarized in Table 1. a� 4 O 1 a VE Terrace Ave. +t+ N 0_ I NCa z Durston Rd. Z t a❑0 N4-1 O N N N 0) r- � LO Z Z z z z z z z z EA 1 W. Beall aaooc�C ' � L 18r- il N end hall:St. 1W.-m in F Ba ock ��C Q Frn �J-- a �. [QllveZSIA t o� ❑ ❑ ❑ [I Curt ' Koch St. N [I [I ❑ El El F1 LIc St. t n 1-1 [1F] ❑ Stor St ❑C4 -1 El � `V 1:4 UQ St. F1 On F1 N L �a�n El 1:1 QU[St. 0 1 O -&j N � Coll a St. .A i N0 QLj St. s Grant a J' Chamber- EIF]IClevuand t. loin Dr. L Julia LO Martin Arth St ' s Dr. N W. Garfield St. Montana Larfl Stl F--I 1 1 ESTINGTRAMC VOLUWS z 1 CMSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES Street Characteristics Within The Stud Area Table 1 S a cs y ' Street Roadway Number of Shoulder Classification(') Lanes Available W. Babcock St. Collector 2 No W.Main Principal Arterial 2(2) Yes 1 College Street Minor Arterial 2 No out 19th Ave. Minor Arterial 2(3) Yes (1) Source: Bozeman Transportation Plan, 1993 Update (2) Portions of this roadway include a Two-Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL) (3) North of Main Street, this roadway has a center median ' 2.1 Existing Roadway Traffic Control ' The existing traffic signal locations proximate to the study area are: • North 19th Avenue and West Main Street • West Main and West College/Main Mall Entrance Stop sign control exists at the following locations ' • on West Babcock Street at South 19th Ave. • on West Babcock and West Main ' • a 4-Way Stop at College and South 19th Ave. 2.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes No designated pedestrian or bicycle routes currently exist within the study area, but are being proposed with Carson Place (A townhouse development on Babcock Street) 2.3 Transit Service ' Transit services in Bozeman are provided by a university supported system, the Bobcat Transit System, and various private contractors serving special users (typically elderly, disabled, or disadvantaged users). 3 ' 2.4 Committed Roadway Improvements ' Study area roadway improvements identified in the Bozeman Transportation Plan Update - 1993 and with funding committed for design and construction include the reconfiguration of West Main/Babcock/North 23rd intersection. The intersection of West Babcock Street with West Main Street was identified by the Transportation Plan Update as a major network improvement. The recommended modification of this intersection is currently being fnished with the city's consultant. At the time of this report, the final design is planned to include: • relocated Babcock and 23rd to single intersection on W. Main (completed) • install signal at this location (being completed) • provide left turn lane and through/right lane on Babcock approach ' • provide right turn lane and through/left lane on 23rd approach • Babcock will have one lane westbound departing from the intersection 2.5 Existing Roadway Traffic Volumes Existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Average Daily Traffic Volumes - 1991 STREET BETWEEN ADT West Babcock Street Development-West Main 2400 West Main Street West of College 11,500 West College - 23rd 16,100 ' 23rd - Babcock 19,700 West College Street East of West Main 4,000 West 19th Avenue North of W. Main 8,200 South of W. Main 9,300 Source: Bozeman Transportation Plan, 1993 Update, Figure 2.2 4 t 2.6 Accident History The accident history for the study area was evaluated over a three year period, 1991-1993 based ' on Montana Department of Justice data. The history reflects the accident trends determined in the Bozeman Transportation Plan Update, completed in 1992. Three high accident.locations are contained within the study area: ' • West College and 19th • West Main and 19th Because one of these locations is currently nearlky completed with improvements, it is assumed the accident frequency will decrease after the improvements are in place. ' 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ' The Carson Place Townhouse Complex is proposed to provide 19 single-family apartment on 19 new townhouse lots on the existing 83,124 square foot lot. The additional number of vehicle trips generated by this project are estimated in Table 3. ' Table 3: Trip Generation ' Trip Type Rate(') Number of Units Total Trips ' Daily Trips (ADT) Living Units 7.439 19 141.34 ' Total 141.34 AM Peak Hour Trips .583 19 9.61/hour PM Peak Hour Trips .724 19 13.8/hour (1) Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1985 Edition ' 3.1 Trip Distribution ' The Bozeman Transportation Model was utilized to distribute the site generated trips onto the local roadway network and to estimate the daily volumes projected both with and without the ' subdivision development. Vehicle trip distribution is summarized in Table 4. ' 5 I ' Table 4: Trip Distribution Directional Distribution Percentage of Site Number of Site Generated Generated Trips Trips ' AM PM Babcock to South 19th 55% 36 41 ' South on South 19th 25% 16 19 ' North on South 19th 30% 19 23 Babcock to West Main 45% 29 44 ' West on West Main 15% 10 11 East on West Main 30% 19 23 ' Source: Bozeman Transportation Model Run Updates ' 3.2 Internal Street Circulation Not Applicable 3.3 Non-Vehicular Trip Impact The project proposes to provide a bike rack adjacent to the bike/pedestrian walk from parking to the building. ' 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS When occupied, the Carson Place Townhouses will generate an additional number of vehicle ' trips, consistent with the forecast growth projected in the Bozeman Transportation Update. The vehicle trips will utilize Babcock and West Main Streets and (primarily) South 19th to access the area roadway network. ' The traffic impact from the project will be apparent on West Babcock South 19th Avenue and P P J PP ' West Main Streets, not in overreaching their capacities, but rather in requiring additional turning movements to/from Babcock. These additional movements, combined with new traffic generators in the area, would support the widening of Babcock to a two-lane city standard, with ' some turning lanes available. 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1 a '4 MEMORANDUM .`' --'-------------------------------------------------------------- TO : DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE FROM : KEVIN WALL , ASSOCIATE PLANNER/URBAN DESIGNER DATE : 3 DECEMBER 1992 k ITEM : "CARSON PLACE" TOWNHOUSE PUD CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW ; 1300 BLOCK OF WEST BABCOCK, " R-3" ( RESIDENTIAL , MEDIUM DENSITY) DISTRICT ---------------------------------------------------------------- The following application is a PUD Concept Plan review for a townhouse development located in the 1300 block of West Babcock . The subject site is located on the south side of Babcock, approximately at the midpoint between South llth Avenue and South 15th Avenue , and between Babcock southward to the point where the northern-most portion of South 13th Avenue dead-ends . Please refer to the attached air photo and the vicinity map on the plat supplied by the applicant . - ' The proposal entails the construction of twenty two. ( 22 ) townhouse units along a single driveway which runs southward from West Babcock and dead-ends at the south of the site . The proposed townhouse units are both .one and two story structures with attached garages . Several relaxations of the Zoning Ordinance, requirements are evident , including setback and PUD open space requirements . The purpose of this review is to provide general direction and ' trouble-shoot any major issues and problems . The DRB in particular should review the PUD chapter in the Zoning Ordinance _. (pp . 194-229 , 1/23/92 version - page numbering may differ with the version Board members have in their possession ) , especially the design criteria and objectives outlined in the "all development" and "residential" checklists provided in pages 222- 227 ( 1/23/92 version ) . Because a subdivision PUD will be necessary for the project as well , DRC members should keep any subdivision.. implications in mind when preparing :your comments . The"­DR3-�wi= reguTar­ me-eti`ng�-` on-"`" Tuesday, 8 December 1992 . The DRC will review this item two times - the first time on Tuesday, 8 December 1992 ; the second time, with written comments due , is Tuesday. 15 December 1292 . Please call me if you have any questions . a cc : Lowell Springer I I, AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1992 CARNEGIE BUILDING, 35 NORTH BOZEMAN 10 : 00 A.M . I FINAL WEEK REVIEWS - None SECOND WEER REVIEWS - None INITIAL WEEK REVIEWS - None 1 CONCEPT PLAN REVIEWS - 1 . Carson Place Townhouse P .U .D . - (Wall ) 10:00 a.m. 1300 Block of West Babcock - Proposal for 22 townhouse units . This - is the first week of a two week review process, please be prepared to provide comments at next week's meeting. INFORMAL REVIEWS - 1 . Connie Hochhalter - (Wall) 10 :20 a.m. 101 East Mendenhall Renovation 'of existing structure . * Assigned times are projected. Please arrive before the scheduled time in the event that the meeting runs ahead of schedua:e This - meeting -is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Ron Brey, .at 586-3321, Extension 202 . i Development Review Comrnittee - December 8 , 1992 ' Members F'resar-ft : David Cameron , Roger, 3icz , Fred -Shields and Craig 6r•awner• . i �t,aff Present ; I<evin M-911 & Terri Yira . Concept Plan Review - Carson Place Townhomes °l anner• W.9- 11 stated that this is a PUD Concept P1 an Review for, a 24 unit t0W nil ome devel oprnent on cr nar•r•oly lot.. 6raw ner said he i knows thi s lot h-a-3 n c_I i s,cfi:.__ecl be for- . but h- r- c.-in ' t re-m---.mber. wl• at the,,, noted t ;.h.-zit tim Planner• '%Ala11 st• ted that the _ - .. _ •frl n t 1:7 f_l :. �i l!:I is•_ _ . " c?it it _ - r i I ?s('i ?f . fV Fred S h i eI ds stated that i t i s a l ong d:_•1d end wi th no turn •around . Planner, V.a1 1 said it doesn ' t appear• to offer, .any PUD am-nities . Roger• Oicz noted that there isn ' t even a hammerhead turnaround . Fred said the water rnain is shown on the wrong side of the street . IP1 inner Skelton said that use .and services wi 1 1 be approved for• only townhouses , and if the PLID were to change , they Would r'E-gUi r•e an enti rel y new appl i cati on . Phi 1 1 s a i d the eaves would Ihave to be located out of the easements . Fred asked if existing buildings are coming out , Wall said they ;ire not shown , so he is not sure . I :_p -i nge-r sai d they c._qn get the egress on to 1 3th through a joi nt •acc--__ ,agreement , =.:fd at t h i s ti n e they _,re 1 ooki n9 •at 1 a n d s c a p I pavers as just •_!n em z r•gency access . kel ton s a i d he t h i n k s i t needs_ to be a f!.rlly paved secondary .access , not i u s t for• emergency . Crai -g Srarrner agreed . pri nger• said they are trying to provide affordable , a ter•n.ati ve housing and this seem_ 1 i ke an appr bpr•i ,_fte place . H did note that said it is a difficult site and it ,appears to meet open space stand•ar,ds . 'dal 1 actual 1 y i t cfoesn ! t meet open space standard; , because hey pr•oposi ng t hrnhouse 1 ots . kel ton =•a i cl i f you ,are cr a`i ng 'lots then the open :=p:==ce nods to be +� I abc,ve and beyond tl.= lot_ and there i _ no -etbac!< h.ar e du_ to 'he r•ear• y.lrrl t•'YG!J1 r'�;n.;nts . I Springer, said if nor,J•_1 lot stancl•_!rds are- going to be applied to townhouses , there is •a problem Melton said they have to go foo,+__p vecl with- , 30 foot asern nt , if •ti' `^Tr�` P 'E , .e s-wa..1! , .� --Y+ti-"�. .`" �_.. •t._r _.:ez. ..s '> `"-�rT•• --- t�ic'� - tr ont ,r.d� ..�_I0 y F•r. twn ,t y - _ �.�. .___.sees � .�._.__.�_ •���-�.- ::-�.•.�, ___.-^� --�-: .a°:�' ,..- �- pr oposi n 4 si dew.al f:- . pr••i n9 r sa t d�i t the i try sidezwaI ks they wi l i provide thnin , but they 1^iOLIN pri vate . Roger, said they would need a Balk there . I I Skelton -asked what they are doing to mitigate- the impacts of the high density development , Lowell Springer' stated that they thou7lit it could be accompl i s•her..l tlirol.rgh exter"i or treatment and landscaping . DRC stated that an Improvement Agreement would be necessary on Babcock . Brawner' sal d affordable housing is a and he is concerned t1)-at _Iffor<1ab1 .--,ppe•9r; to me•- n sacs i f i r_.i rig St•anc,._,rdS that ��rer'e developed for' a r"e,=,Son . He stated that it iS necessary to come to a balance . Frowr!er a. IN,e•d i f there i s real 1 y goi ng to be enough parking sP•,--C , wl -fi Such nar-'r-o s+r' s . =:ke1 ton _a i t i S i mpor't_ant to k=_.a n r rd that =sfford.,ID1e housing c•=,nnot act the r'egul •yt0r'y -- _ - _ .. = -`_ �`i ." � ._;:i c::lr'' �!Il =, i=i ��ti =,;i':� -. - i : . r•�:�;.L:lfi_ �•-. '- - o V l Cl s b : C_.'i l!1 V r �:i r' ack ,tanda- r'd; , but the high density would onl y be al 1 owed i f tl!_.y' comP1 i �d w i th r'egul •3tor'y s t,andar'ds . SkeI ton stated that surrounding properties did not go 'through the Subdivision Review process , and now in order to make it affordable they need to have increased density . He stated that he is tire—Cl o; these 10 n d s of., projects conri ng before them , when actual 1 y i t i s the o�+rn�r'S p rob 1 e-m for not subdi v'i di ng . ! ' Skel ton stated that in his mind -1 ' - - Place _ should c, !�� 1 i kc C ..1 1 Fl ace +ih-r•e they ended up constructing 3 homes on the lot . Skelton sai(a street standards aren ' t being met . Erawner' said, he can ' t say —Chi_, is a whole lot different 'than what Spr-'uce M -9— d0WS or' 6r'i dger Peaks di d . Phil 1 Forbes Stated -that the .1pp1 i c•9,nt COL11 d finish off 13th there , so there i s a clear• end to the p u b 1 is street and beginning to the private driv= . Springer states: that he ai:Du1d' i i l:e to addr'e_,s the i Ssue , and 1) clue=boned if a 3Q 1 foot easement iS acceptable with a 26 toot drive . �k_1 ton s.3 : d the Engi n_:eri rig Depar'tment k+;i 11 have to give th final say on that Issue . Br'•awner' _aicI he wa--:;n ' t sure that th y ' �+louId need thy. cul -de-S,ac , i f they h._ive the througni ac.c.ess , however they would want a secondary acce_-5 that discourages purl i c tr'ai-+i c . ' GRC- discussed p•9r'king enforcement concerns on the proposed p r i v:9te :treet . S1:el tor", =.=,i d fie feel s the <;ensi ty needs to be r:--I- fo; the ov=-;-.111 project un1 =.•ss t' ca- n mitig.—Ite th Spr'i n--i r st=,t=c1 that they c.an :t;t i n more parking ' Pol r Sicz noted th._,t there is 1 Substantial elev-rt_ion difference• n t-b l 9 t • n d_ 13, t.b H!i w, t Il 1. rl t v ll i yl rl t h t. .. tat_d tl a P1 anni ng wou1 d find i t har <:I to u;�oor't clue to minimum lcjt siI, lot cov rage , and aesthetic qualitie_~ . F.r'a�vner asked i f th-se =.r'_ the sort of i ssues that should be addressed in ` ari.anca Proceedings , before they continue on to DR-S . Skelton said not +/ith the PUCE process , beCauS= the relaxation of St•andar'ds comes thr'ou•7h the r evi e1+1 pr•ocesS . i 1 , ' Skel ton 's•ai cl that as a member, of this Committee , Planning would have to vote in terms of Zoning , and he doesn ' t feel that they we in the position to relax st•=ndards . ' Skel ton said it sounds 1 i ke the dr-ive width wi 1 1 work. as long as it has th;: _ecolndarV acces:J th.-at di scour•a'-� a th?"OLI-Z.1h tr•• ttic . H , noted that s i gn•age wi 1 1 be ` i mF:or• cant to make i t work , . and i n ' teems of r•el axati on of lot Si _e they clon ' t see the amenities ther-e to grant that . Wa1 1 s a i cl i ength of townhouses is too long , and he agrees that the ameni t ss 1_)ei n'q pr'•ovi de-cl i ;i 1 i eu of re1axcttiC). ar nC;t o1)vio(As . r•r f _ _ _. 1 .� ' - [.i. 1 7_ _ ._ - �-..: L i I'_ v ID a f: _ I n j 1 '! C:.I I'I i_ =(,; i .1 = a I F :J r•cl•_!b 1 C I'I;;�:j I I I:� C ' statecl that if they were to just do the- project as ap•ar•tments they could make it work ; but trey wanted to be able to provide affordable homes for• people , and since the banks don ' t like ' conclos they are going townhouses . Spr•i nger• said size of the lot is their, biggest r•el ,ax.ati on . Planner- Wa11 stated that comments wi11 be due next week , 3;Dr•-i ng er• asked where th--y ,ar , at as far• as m e e t i ng D R C st•lnclar•d_ of approval . Planner• Skelton _aicl they ar•e askinlg to relax standards and provide •amenities in lieu . At this time- Skelton noted that they would need 30% open space beyond the identified lots , par,ki n is an i ssr-r.e -and Cher— wi 11 be DRE concerns . Skelton said that setbacks ar•e there to serve the purpose of providing chatacter• .and he thinks they need to r•e.-1ch .9- COMP r-•omi se . =ltel'tan s•ai d i - they ar•e j ust M 'C-ti ng I--ode r•eq�_Iir•e«:ents , thm=-n t_h y •..ire rot providing extra amenities . Spr•i nger sai d they carp el i mi n:at units to make room for• acldecl •ern n i i =_ . but t1-1ey won t be• affC. cl•ahl E_ .anymore . 1 l Design Review Board - December' 8 . 1 99= Members Pre Sent : _ferry Bancroft, W-5de Kuml i en , E1 1 en Kr'ei ghb•aum and Cliff Chisholm . ' Staff Present : Kevin Wall &. Terri Yira . Concept Plan Review - Carson Place Townhouses ' Lowell Springer present , Wall said tf-re major i SsueS on th i s pr'oject r'e.al 1 y fall in to the Zoni nci r".-a i (11 Of the r=Vi ew. pi"OC t it I st•=1tc!'f +119+ i fl= 1 iz-s are below minimum lot regr_lir mants and th=y don ' t meet ._ .t I.,•y k _ :I n y i.),h e r._ = T- i (_ r' I_t,= % _ i _ _ I 1 _ (_•i') 'i t-I= _ i _ _ CI i ff Chisholm stated t1)at they ar`e ce-r'ta- i nl y I o o k i n'_ a._ mi i-Ii mum open space . P1 •inner W•al 1 sai c1 tf,ey ar � ,_rl so at the f_,ar� minimum for parking , and DFC thought more parking spaces Should be y ' required due to the anticipated demand . Planner Wall stated that additional par'ki ng WOul d fur+_her deg r'ad-ate the environmental qual i ty Of the property , al 1 though he can see the need . Planner, Wal 1 Stated that the road i s pl anned to be a 26 foot wi de pri v•ate drive , with no parking . Jer-ry Bancroft asked what 'mikes this pr'olect better than average , so it should be granted through ' the PUD process . Planner' Wall said h-, doe: feel it offers any .amenities at this time . PI •lnne•r W•a 11 s•ai d their' one benefit i S that they want to provide affordable housing , but that is not addre'sse-d as a criteria in th- F•='----iti o n s . r Jerry asked how i t addr~e_=ed some specific items in tf-re PUD cr'i ter'i .a . PI •anner' 't .al 1 s•ai cl .at tfii S =gage i t i s just a -ol-kept P1 an R e v i ;---w to help the ,appI i cant tr'oubI e shoot ,any maior issues . F'1 ,7-tnner Wallsaid he fe=1 s that the relaxationof the r'eguI at i Ons are hard to j ustl fly with the amenities sf-own on this pl •_,n . Planner' Wall stated that the provided rear' setbacks ran94. ?'> from 5- 10 feet - and 20 is required' PI inner' Wall suggested tht,t Lowell Springer provide an overview of the project for, DFE . - ' ,r r'Y re Bancroft asked ashy th=y w-Int to do a PL•.D rather than a tyr)i cal R-3 �I vel opm_nt . �pr"i ng�r' S•�i d th z-y Saw the Opportunity ' t'(D aC.it;l 'Ctcr s a1 t'e r'n•at i _jffor"d.ai:,1 h b c.tO occu i a1 1 ow .)u_i nq anCf fle nC,t?c� '1-1.-It th, pr�;O er"t`% :� Ci r' �u'= Sur'r'Oundi n-: u1=,+'ll 'v 1 =l tin di f f i Cul t to use eff=Cti vel y for, F.• -3 , so they tf-�oug1)t t1,eY COui d provide. affordable fami 1 y owned housi ng . Lowe-I 1 Springer said _1 7 k�-___t.��_ homestead.. r o - a�;i l c h �a a^ fairly '. h= ra , Springer commented that this is not an imaginative site plan , but a' he thinks they can do something " with landscaping and exteriors to' make it i ntere'sti ng". H - said the biggest problem is that they don r t c o m p I y wi th r- ui r'=d t0wnh0us;:- 1 Ot s1 ze-s . 0 k I ' GRE di scussed maximum density for, the acreage . •Je:•ry Bancroft •asked what happens on both =ides of this pr•oper•ty . cringer said, there i s a tr•ai 1 er• court on the east and Pioneer• ��ourt is on the ' west , Jer•r•y E•ancr oft stated th�rt i t i s goi ng to be very tight , and as the tr,•ai 1 er,s leave on the one side something else wi 1 1 go in , so the tightness conce-r•rl'_ Him . Epr•inger• _•::,id I-1_ didn ' t f:ei that smal l rear• yard setback we-r•e that r•ar•e in ltownhouse projects he has wor•ke.d on . He said they will definitely meta to relax that cr•i teri a- for• rear, yard _�etb•acks ' P1 •anner• W.111 said those rear+• y.•ar•d setbacks take e f f e t , as they h•��ie t0 go by +h ariv1 i c•=il 1 - R-3 de.=i g n-1tl On . 1 nc-_ the r,emo va - i' I t i" I :'! p i 1 F _ •_1 i t d ,r s t i 1 1 •_l J v y ���>'i i_i t 11 G b;�_-C_.•1 us,� i l e LI 1 CI n ' t i C� I -1 1�y done- th e = _m th•_,t +Tray i n the past H - stated that PUG ' ;howl d be ev•11 u•ated on their, mer•i t , taking into cons der,ati on aneni ti es and design qualities . Jerry Bancroft stated that the pui:,pose of the PUD is to look for, innovative solutions to r•egul at i ons , and he asked if Lovie-1 1 would ' explore how he feels they meet thos.a for, them . Lowel 1 Spr•i tiger, said he feel s thei r• PUD r•ecogni zes front and r•e•ar• setbacks , and tries to meet the side setbacks , wh-i 1 e- doing something cr•eati ve . ' He stated that they want to find out if this kind of an approach has anything to offer, to allow r•el axed standar•cls through a PUG and if so what doe's it have to trade off . •Jer•r•y asked what kind of advan+_•age_ the project would offer if they wer•� to aqr•_ _ to the kv.ay the-y h•_iv�_= calculated ti;e length of the lot as the side- yard setL-)ack . Lowe-Il said he feels that there i s a need for, this type of housing at an affordable rate , and that is his number, one amenity '. Sud Kuml i en sta ed that Ile i :s not concerned •about the den'_,i ty , but he is concerned abou perce- ivable open space issue; , .and the availability of second •acce s s . ' Lowell said they will definitely havc- -access on to 13th . Eud also stated concern over, future development to the east . He stated that there is a need for- this type of housing , but as W-311 has stated , there is nothing in the PUG cr•i ter•i a that allows DR8 to ' ad t h i s type �„ l d;-r vi -i r. 1 on rba_ed on need . E•ud _,i d setback ] ' 1N n_ {:I to L,-.. ,o, -11"r11 <i , but i f CF'C ,n rc-ep t th- n 1; - .i-: .- !i '_,it �i } :. 1 �: ..i c:i _ _ _ OD -it c a - - tit I'J'- _ ' I a n d s c a p i n 9 and planr-ing . - Ellen Kr- :i:7h-b,a-'um---s-a-id S he--..-wou1-d - l-ike..to __ .. the �cr:eativar-t-h:i-n9T'_:._ . , ...-- . p-1::firr K: t H= 1 t:=; -_..; _ E,_.__. h.e•_ ca::�_ .-. >. a a..... o �:pr: i:nacr .-_.died.. he- th- r.,..�_=t� ;: y use ni ce i d e n t i f y i ng featl_rr_s on the exter•i or•s to mak- these 1 oo!< ' 1 i k;n homes . E1 1 en expressed concern over• the P .a n 1 to attempt to mi x .a•ge •groups i n such sm•a,l 1 area and the n•arr•own ss of the r,cadways . P ' Kuml i en 'expressed concern over the fact that there is no way to get out of this area on foot , without going out on to Babcock. , . but he realizes that is a City problem , riot .a development ' problem . Cliff asked if they were planning on development of an i nter,n.al si dewa1 k . Jer,r•y B.ancr•oft stated that the PUD cr•i ter•i a 3p=..3k to reducin:4 _ri-.r•:jy cr:r;sLi mpti . and (I-=,m.ynd , an:_I he_ V,o1-1dcr _d if they -intend to have constr,uct_ion that address those issues . Lowe1 1 s•ai d they ar-•e -looking at R-W.al 1 panels , with R30 i n the -wal 1 s .and R40 or• 50 if) the ceiling . He- noted that if the site t,rere wi der• th-=y coin c! change thi ngs to Li i 1 i ze more energy ' effi ci e.ncy , but they .are kind of forced into this strong north out.h .91 i .-lnrn--nt . =,ri ri i _ _} th u t i 1 i ty ea_-r1=nt', .an::I :-1;7 r 1" ='v a r i r ter" r r = _ . ' Jer•r•y Bancr•oft •ask.d if this development could be made to i nte.ar•ate wi th its neighbors in any way . Wade said '_her'e won ' t be .any east/west i ntegr•ati on . Jerry said he would like to see logical places that cool d develop into pedestHan or,i ent,-ati on in the future , be planned for, now . ' Jer•r•y said he would like to see more justification for• the PUD , i n the form of i nter•n.al •amenities not typical for• the R-3 cli str•i ct . -Spr•i nger• said they would need some' w..3y to deal wi th the mobile home .-area to encourage continuity . Bud said if they 1 i ned up with what i s exi st i ng at 1 east they woul cln ' t block off the future possibility of having cor•r• idoes between the developments . ' C1 i ff sai d th; y have 1 ooked •at a piece of pr•ope y on the other, Side Oi ..c',hw•arr,e9an 1)etor'e and d- sCussed some. of these same ' aspects . He fel t that if there were pr•essur•e to coor-dinate the developments on •a Planning l evE-l it would be beneficial in the long run . 3pr'i nger• s•=:i d it is a good poi nt and hr wi 11 1 ook at ' the potential to do somethi nq pede'_tr•i an-wi se . E1 1 en asked -if each side of the easement belongs to a property owner• . Lowell s a i d no , i t is common open space . Jer•r•y Bancroft asked i f •� cornmi tment i s made to the ._el 1 i rig pr•i ce i 11 the covenants . ' Planner, -Skelton said that can ' t be done , .and Wa11 addecl that he di d n ' t feel they coin d c o n s i der• i t .9s P U D cr•i ter•i a . -i I',r•y B:tz-incr•oft said: if they can ' t 11a t - t ' _ - '. i�� I-�tii r~ fi•a = ors s f i xad 1 -1 n,:I Pr•i C:e h e h _ a pr'c:,b I 'i v/1 _ ., t11a urn i en _•a id ti _ =ilV l r'Cjlrricili'. °d l:: lc: .= _ .: i ,�il ;'rli �zlr, (JI _c tc Lii• 5_ i i i i _ ('; c am , :ar',;: would rather, see t h i s than anotlier row of tr•ai 1 er,s . Jer•r•y said the e•ffor•t is commendable , but he feels -it =ti 1 1 need- to be - qu:_r1 i ty dev-el-opmen't. -- --_.._. _...... _ _ _.. :.._. .__ SPr-i ng r sai d he thinks that F11D cr•i t .r•i .a does addr s_ th. s fig price issues . liff said it appears that this is an issues which falls outside of the Code , and they can ' t .address ' those. by the letter• of the Code . Jerry said -Springer• ' = pr_sentati on needs to work toward the letter, of the Code . Cliff s•_iid he would like to see them address the issue of larger one open space , and he felt "that the addressing of the rear yards Of the lots •1:S sideyar•cls of the property is also •_i long shot , a:=; that is not the functi oil of the property . :.-pri nger• said he feels it works effectively , because ther:_ i _ a priVate patio area creat_�•d i n t_hEl' rear, and i t can ' t be kept •9ffordabI e any other r W-.Ziy . F.cllicrGft s.li(A sf =orda[.,le r% not i:._i!i 1-v y from =q .r-Iiti =that high density requi r e s . Spr•i nger• said they ar•e t r y i ng to develop variation on the b a s i c u n i is , and pl an to r•ot•_ite the occurrence of the units , ' El1e.I i<rei -4hb•,um st•1ted that In, thInks these �•ii I E,ppeaI to ou n'F v - f:=im i i - - at fi r� ,t •9nci g i v�-1-1 tl-1._it :.r• i r,;,t -,1 c:t or ti i'7 k, i i r i, l l _t i' •6•=1 = j_) 1 i `i^r _�,=i"i nia y _ l "I_',= j co:;1 :� 1. . ' a coupl rof units and create 1 .9r•zier 'open sp.=,ce . 6 u d `sai d he w o u 1 d i i ke- to see that . Springer asked i f tl. appl i cat on was wort)-, pur,sui ng i f he deal t with the i^saue of providing addi ti on•_il ' open space . E_RS said yesZ. t I ' AGENDA ' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ' TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1992 CARNEGIE BUILDING, 35 . NORTH BOZEMAN 10 : 00 A.M . FINAL WEER REVIEWS - None SECOND WEER REVIEWS - None INITIAL WEEK REVIEWS - None CONCEPT PLAN REVIEWS - ' 1 . Carson Place Townhouse P .U .D .', -',::(Wall) 10:00 a.m. 1300 Block of West Babcock - Proposal for 22 townhouseunits . This is the second ' week of a two week review process, comments for inclusion in the Planning Staff Report will be required at this meeting. i . * Assigned times are projected . : Please arrive before the scheduled time in the event that the: meeting runs ahead of schedule This meeting is open to all members of the publics If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ADA Coordinator, Ron Brey, at 586-33213. Extension 202. 1 i bevel ooment Review Committee - December 1 5 , 1992 Member- Present . Fred -chi elcls , Cr_,ig 6rawner , kyle Harlan _Intl Roger Sicz . Staff Present : Kevin Wall & Terri Yi r••a . Carson Place Townhouses - Lowell Springer Present . Springer said last week it was apparent that they need to develop the. s=concl access and DR6 want_cl density dropped a bit with more C,pc it _p•aC=s . L t z ._a i J II� i to i u t •-i 1 .',i r-;0Illm•7 I,t I,- . r•-I+- t II:i i I. c l ' l•^-f=• 1.`. ill 71 I'. i T_ I L::I r• t I i:7� - _I-)-. _ :'.,•_�11<1 •�t_L!�V _ m_ _ �_ I_%- _ `%•1 1 l •7���1 C , Waivers for, i mprovem_nts to Babcock wi 1 1 be r-qui red , dr•ai nage- rl::ez.d to be addressee! , no siclezwa1ks on Babcock at this time , but they •.ai 11. want Wai vers .and snow removal areas must be denoted on the FSP . Roger Si cz also stated that they wi 1 1 need a 1 i ght .at Babcock and 11th eventually , and so he woulcl like a Waiver• on that as well , for, their f•_:ir• share of the development . Craig 6rawner, said he had a few comments . He stated that they wi 11 neecl a right of tray easement on the access to 13th ,and on the -s r e e t I the priv,lte street mint be dedicated for private use and he noted that they wi 1 1 not have room tor- sidewalk with a 30 foot easemelit for both Lit 1 i ti eS ante access . Lowel 1 _aid what about 30 feet for• tale d r i ve and uti 1 i ti es , and then . = i de•w.il ks coulcl be on private property . 6rawner, said the streets need to be platted .as dedicated somehow through a statement on the s i t_ plate , and they can take a look .at how other's were done . Springer said that statement i - on them , bLIt may need to be re--worded a i bit . ,.r•awn=r also commented that the connection to 13th should have .a I , caul -de- -sac , w h i ch i nc1 u d e s c:ur'b ,and gutter' and sidewal k , .and S 11-':)LII d be finished off as a public street with at least 50 foot_ diameter• , preferably 75 . Rogar asked how it would fit into the tr•.9nsi ti on , l_owe1 l .explained how it would work . 6r•.=Iwner~ _aid he is open to \o;aleCher• it 1)em a dr•oo curb , r'•=*her• thaw := •and•s:rd city drive .a •pr•o.-1ch , hu'i _t•:ated th•_it it should ije s,igtl=d n p•sr-1( i ng . 6r,awner• not-,d th.,t they shoed cl keep i ri mi nc that the a• ;_r"( •�; 11 i l l :1 111 tl? l^;`1'_ti1-r` tit = ia'i ].Hr _ Lased for• t_hr0LIg11 traffic re9ular•1y or• not . Brawner said h= woulcl j al so requi re Waii vers for, curie , gutter- , si d e w a 1 k , storm dr•ai n.aae •and p8 vi nq for• one half of Ci tv Standard Street on Babcock . i GR' di scusse-d wheth=r the arr--a on Babcock is dedicated as right- of-way or, =asem_lit , and exactly how wide it would be required to he . !_owe 1 1 agr-ed to ._, 60 foot e•1sem=nt , rather, than right of way . 61-•awner• al so st•at=+d tl•I.5t he t h i n k s h= :ou1 d 1 i ke W.ai var• for' sew=r improvements on *North 1 7 t h , du= to possible bottIenecl< th=r _ . La_t1 y , 1) s t a ted that clI-•:Ii n:-lge and 9racli ng plan_ o;oLrlcl i need to be lciclr CJJCd . The.r e was same discussion on the cur•r•en t r•un-off - situation for• the lot . Spr•i n'9er• said there is enough den, i ty of roofs and pavement i n this project that they are going to have al of of rUn-off ,, so they will mi ther• have to have hl_rge on-si te ; r,etenti on or, connect to the storm :se,wer' Br'•r,wner _•di d he agr e cd. with Roger, that they Would be r,equir,=d to si-4n i1 1a1•_iiver•• to si9na1izatioil at 11th and ' Babcock . Fred Shields •said his comments .ar•e =t,and:,r•cl for, water and sewer' , and thy. 1 oo,D looks fine, . h;a1 1 sai e he cov=reel Zoning C�.•di na. nce, regr!i cement= , 1 anclsc•api ng i dea ,+ DR8 pedest'r•i an and bi cycl e ._(i= 1 i_ i ... .. Orll(il i I [ = I C_1. �? ( li'_ I i - I',_ t DI" i_ i I': •CI ii:i _ 1'._. -._ ! _! b 1 1 'i y (D I :i'O e r' 'i fn t'i i' 01 i _ :. c I.;I'.•.•i 1 l I'I Spr•i nger• said he feel s the s•31 v a t i on of t1)e project wi 11 be open spaces , landscaping wnd architectural tr,ea+_ments , W-3 .also ' covered i n his r•epor•t are suggestion;_ towar•cl bui 1 di ng treatment and the issue of affor'dabi 1 i ty as a f;ictor' in the decision . Wa1 1 recommended that the applicant traik to HRDC about their• standar•cls , and he, wi 11 tal k wi thl `there a n d as wel 1 Ml 1 ote 1 •_rstl y , that P1 anni ng St•aff wi 1 1 al 1 C;;w in a d d i ti onal Concept P1 an Review , under, this same fee , after, they have detai 1 eel th_- pr,oj ect out more . He- stated that . in formal ' submittal they shout d slio��r how they met PUCl '�ui del i nes . Clan said he doesn ' t feel tIier•e is anyway -to enforce low income- rent•- , '.1 though he would love to see the concept work . C•r,-_9Wner. s•ai d if people soul d b u i .I d' 1 ow i ncome housi ng and meet a 1 the r,egi.rl at on , they v:roul d b_ _ bui 1 di ng them , the issue to him is that nobody wants to gi ve - up stand•ar•ds . %4,911 said there i s 1 an9ua_je comi ng into the PUD to 'addr,ess affor;d•abl e housi n'� , however, with the cut in density the -affor•dabi 1 i ty goes a.�t•ay . Spr•i nger• s a i d t h%-,y col_rl d do .3p•ar•tme-nt_ =rnc1 meet the cr•i ter•i a pretty ea•si 1 y , but they 1r,e tr•yi ng to cr•e.ate some-thi 11'4 that people can own , and he noted that he doesn I t feel that the ' townhouse ordinance a ow them to do what they need to do to 'aai n ownershi p . W..i1 1 sai d affor,dabi 1 i ty c ome's down to density . ?pr, i nger, said even the cheap houses ren t affor•dabl e anymore bec._ius., those. aren ' t livable . MEMORANDUM 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ TO: LOWELL SPRINGER FROM : KEVIN WALL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER/URBAN DESIGNE DATE: 15 DECEMBER 92 RE: CARSON PLACE PUD CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW ------------------------------------------------------------------ The following comments are offered in relation to the above- referenced project. 1 . As the project is currently presented the density is acceptable , however, the project, fails to meet a number of R-3 District requirements and does '. not offer any amenities or design excellence to warrant the approval of a PUD. Rather, ' it appears that the PUD designation was sought meiely because the conventional zoning requirements could not 'be met . 2 . The above mentioned zoning ordinance deficiencies include : ' A. 18 . 20 . 020 PERMITTED USES ,; R-3 District (pg . 39 ) - townhouse clusters not to exceed 5 units or 120 feet in length; four of the six 'cluters exceed 120 feet in length. F. 18 . 20 . 030 LOT AREA AND WIDTH , R-3 District (pg . 40 ) - minimum average lot area .for a townhouse in the R-3 District is 3 , 000 square feet ; the lots proposed range from approximately 1 , 800 square feet to 2 , 800 square feet - this is a requirement and not "a guideline . " C . 18 . 20 . 040 LOT COVERAGE AND YLOOR AREA, R-3 District (pg . 40 ) - no .more than 40% of the lot area shall be covered by principal and accessory, buildings ; in some instances plus/minus 45% is illustrated. D. 18 . 20 . 050 YARDS , R-3 District (pg . 40 ) - minimum 25 foot front ya-rd setbacks and minimum 20 foot rear yard setbacks are required; the Planning Office does not agree that the entire development site constitutes the parcel. from which setbacks are measured, thus , the 30% open .._space- called out in. the ,PUD .guidelines . is. significantly— ' reduced. 3 . Landscape elements need to be introduced and open space should be aggregated to some extent so that these areas do not appear to be created just because easements coincidently were in existence ; some sort of active recreational amenities/ facility( ies ) /fixtures should be provided in the open space area( s ) . I recommend using a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs ( including flowering ) appropriate at the various scales involved for the project ( i . e . , scale of street and open space within the development and vertical ' elements which will be visible up to a block away) . Careful attention should be given to screening the project at the south, east and west , and ' it is recommended that berming and hedge materials interspersed with other plantings be used ( such as lilacs or larger trees where space permits ) . In addition, on-site detention/retention areas provide an excellent opportunity for landscape/open space amenities . Please keep the underground utilities in mind when selecting plant materials so that roots won' t damage any existing or proposed lines ( i . e . , 30 foot wide easements) . 4 . Some attention needs to be given to pedestrian and bicycle facilities . I would reiterate the DRB' s suggestion of linking pedestrian paths to the surrounding developments if possible . ' In addition, these facilities should be adequate for bicycle circulation as well , and bike racks for visitors should be supplied intermittently throughout the site (adjacent to the supplemental parking is acceptable) . ' 5 . To make the site plan more interesting , and to make better use of the limited amount of space ; it is recommended that you ' experiment with the possibility of a curvilinear street and "pods" or clusters of townhouses, in lieu of the linear strips of building/street/building . 6 . I am fairly impressed with the preliminary floor plan (although it is not subject to the PUD review) , however, the exterior design is -in need of further development . I recommend that you study historical examples that are more urban and economical ( rather than the current suburban proposal ) . One "urban" examiple which offers stylistic qualities yet is typically economical is the row house (would apparently work well with the floor plan concept as well ) . Please study the relationships of the building massings further to minimize the "suburbanesque , " fixed one story/two story scenario (massings and/!or roof planes which fall somewhere between the first and second storys would help) . In addition, it is recommended' that three-dimensional relief be incorporated into the facade design by providing "punched" window openings , true divided light windows , defined *sills or headers , occassional bay windows and transoms , etc . ( small touches which emphasize the architectural features yet don' t add significant costs ) . 2 7 . As to the issue of affordability., the PUD chapter of the ' Zoning Ordinance should provide allowances for affordable projects by approximately mid-February 1993 , thus , a formal review would be more advantageous after this amendment is adopted. In addition, if affordability is to become a rationale for the approval of such a PUD, appropriate assurances that the units will be available to modest income households will need to be incorporated into covenants, sales agreements , etc . It is recommended that you contact HRDC ( Jeff Rupp or Karen Couch) for methods of insuring perpetual affordability and possible participation in the project . ' 8 . We would facilitate another Concept Plan review before DRC and DRB under your current application 'to review further developed plans prior to a Preliminary Plan submittal . 9 . The Preliminary Plan submittal will need to include an overview of the PUD standards ( i . e. , checklists ) .which states how the guidelines have been met , why specific guidelines are not applicable , how impacts have been mitigated, etc . It is not too . early to begin your review against these PUD guidelines and checklists . 10 . A Subdivision PUD will be required in order to accomo date the proposed private street. This application will need to be ' submitted concurrently with the Zoning PUD. I 1 3 i so2� THE CITY OF BOZEMAN 411 E. MAIN ST. P.O. BOX 640 PHONE (406) 586-3321 BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715-0640 co moo? ' TO: DRC FROM: Fred Shields, Superintendent of Water/Sewer ye'YJ RE: Plan Review Comments CA�so� /�cE DATE: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' -�JA ivi���/c f _= t v!:F/, ?. .�i/•� ter" k'7� t/ / �'r:� Gi'�ia�( r7 ' "2 o/ �S''c'co,�� n�.�'uJi��_ •� ,ti/� U✓r� :-�: E� F /.-,c �• !j(/,gf�.E' J7'ir�/� ,L.X/El"�/�J/'1 �L" �00��, � / 'i`✓:o �����` �f 1;% f�T OOT�/ ;� U�! c.� Dl� �c J9D/_%•fir, G�y� G/✓•�7'r- s��r�,r /,-y! �,C odd-r7 ' r�< 6� Ai s��i/c�� ,yAo�eo/%d f1 cct/o �c✓ d�v 1/� A ' • HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY a, GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK MEMORANDUM -------------------------- -------------------------------------- TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM : KEVIN WALL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER/URBAN DESIGNER ' DATE: 17 MARCH 1993 RE: PUD CONCEPT PLAN , CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES - SOUTH SIDE OF ' WEST BABCOCK BETWEEN S. 11TH AVE. AND S . 15TH AVE. ------------------------------------------------------------------ At the request of the Planning Staff , the developer has revised the above referenced project for an additional concept plan review. As you will recall , this project was reviewed by the DRB last December. The minutes from the previous DRB meeting and Staff comments for the developer are attached for your reference . 1 1 . ' MEMORANDUM ------------------------------------------------------------------ ' TO: LOWELL SPRINGER AND DON BOCHHAHN FROM: KEVIN WALL, ASSOCIATE PLANNER/URBAN DESIGNERV�LL- ' DATE: 17 MARCH 1993 RE: REVISED CARSON PLACE PUD CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW ------------------------------------------------------------------ ' The following comments are offered in relation to the above- referenced project . Some of the suggestions were expressed in my comments on the previous proposal as well . ' 1 . As you are aware , the project as proposed does not meet the Permitted Uses ( i . e . , length of townhouse clusters ) , Lot Area and Width, Lot Coverage , and Yards requirements of the R-3 District . As it may be difficult to approve a PUD of this sort and frustration with the townhouse requirements of the R-3 District has been expressed , you may want to consider ' proposing a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance . No guarantees can be offered as to whether either the text amendment or the PUD would be approved or denied. ' 2 . Some sort of active recreational amenities/ facility( ies )/ fixtures should be provided in the open space area( s ) . A seating niche or two is a step in the right direction. ' I recommend using a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs ( including flowering ) appropriate at the various ' scales involved for the project ( i . e. , scale of street and open space within the development and vertical elements which will be visible up to a block away) . In short , the plant list should be diversified to provide several species and cultivers ' of plants rather than just one species for each plant type . Because the organization of the project as a whole is very ' linear, I suggest that you emphasize the street through the regularized placement of street trees , even if they are planted every 30 feet or so just along the common open space ' areas . Further, the landscape design should emphasize both the vehicular and pedestrian entry points of the development . Careful attention should be given to screening the project at ' the south, east and west, and it is recommended that beaming and hedge materials interspersed with other plantings be used ( such as lilacs or larger trees where space permits ) . In ' addition, on-.site detention/retention areas provide an excellent opportunity for landscape/open space amenities. 1 Please keep the underground utilities in mind when selecting plant materials so that roots won' t damage any existing or proposed lines ( i .e . , 30 .foot wide easements ) . 3 . Some attention needs to be given to pedestrian and bicycle facilities . In addition to the DRB' s suggestion of. linking pedestrian paths to the surrounding developments to the east and west (please verify that there is reasonable feasibility that these links can be connected at some point in time ) , a walkway should be extended to South 13th Avenue as well . Bike racks for visitors should be supplied intermittently throughout the site (adjacent to the supplemental parking is acceptable ) . j If the walkways are to remain curvilinear , the landscape design should strongly correlate to this design cue . The sidewalks along the private street should span the individual driveways ( i . e . , sidewalk sections ) to emphasize a pedestrian orientation . 4 . The exterior design is in need of further development . I recommend that you study historical examples that are more urban and economical ( rather than the current suburban proposal ) . One "urban" ' example which offers stylistic qualities yet is typically economical is the row house (would apparently work well with the floor plan concept as well ) . Please study the relationships of the building massings further to minimize the "suburbanesque, " fixed one story/two story scenario (massings and/or roof planes which fall somewhere between the first and second storys would help) . In addition, it is recommended that three-dimensional relief be incorporated into the facade design by providing "punched" window openings , true divided lite windows , defined sills or headers , occassional bay- windows and transoms , etc . ( small touches which emphasize the architectural features yet don' t add significant costs - incorporating every last one of the elements listed is not necessary) . Covered porches which run along the front facades would improve the proposed structures dramatically ( a relatively inexpensive amenity) . This would emphasize the pedestrian environment and would appear to be a reasonable trade-off for relaxing the front yard setbacks . 5 . I would suggest that the project include a central recycling collection point for the residents of the development ( something of a glorified dumpster enclosure ) . This could help the project in relation to the enery/resource i conservation requirements . In addition, because affordability is a key issue for this project , the profits from the center could be used to defer maintenance costs for the homeowners association. The center may need to be kept locked with' keys distributed to the individual owners . O-Z I� 6 . If affordability is to become a rationale for the approval of such a PUD, appropriate assurances that the units will be available to modest income households will need to be incorporated into covenants , sales agreements , etc . It is recommended that you contact HRDC (Jeff Rupp or Karen Couch) for methods of insuring perpetual affordability and possible participation in the project. As the ordinance was amended ( #4 in residential PUD checklist , Ordinance #1359 effective 2/24/93 ) , affordability is somewhat linked to a density bonus . 7 . The Preliminary Plan submittal . will need to include an overview of the PUD standards ( i .e . , checklists ) which states how the guidelines have been met , why specific guidelines are not applicable , how impacts have been mitigated, etc . It is not too early to begin , your . review against these PUD guidelines and checklists. 8 . A Subdivision PUD will be required in order to accomodate the proposed private street . This application will need to be submitted concurrently with the Zoning PUD. d Design Review Bo•ar,d - December, 8 . 199 ' Members Present : Jer•r•y Bancroft , Wade Kumlien , Ellen Kr•eighbaum and Cliff Chisholm. ' Staff Present : Kevin Wall & Ter•ri Yir•a . ' Concept Plan Review - Carson Place Townhouses Lowell Springer, present . Wall said the major• issues on this project really fall in to the ' Zoning realm of the r•ev•iew process . Wall stated that the lot sizes ar•e below minimum lot requirements , and they don ' t meet setbacks anywhere except for, the zero lot lines on the sides . Cliff Chisholm stated that they ar•e certainly looking at minimum open space . Planner,. Wall said they ar•e also at the bare minimum tor• par•ki ng , and DRC thought more par•ki ng spaces should be ' r•equir•ed due to the anticipated demand . Planner- Wall stated that additional parking would further degraclate the environmental quality of the pr,oper•ty , all though he can sae the need . Planner, Mall stated that the road is planned to be a 26 foot wide' p r i vote dr•i ve , with no par•ki ng . Jerry Bancroft asked what makes ' this project better• than average , so it should be granted through the PUD process . Planner- Wall said .he doesn ' t feel it offers any amenities at this time . Planner, Wall said their, one benefit is that they want to provide affordable housing , but that is not addressed as a criteria in the Regulations . Jer•r•y asked how it addressed some specific items in the PUD cr•iter•ia . Planner Wall said at this stage it is just a Concept Plan Review , to help the. applicant trouble shoot any major issues . Planner, Wall said he feels that the relaxation of the regulations ar,e hard to justify with the amenities shown on this plan . Planner- Wall stated that the provided rear, setbacks range from 5- 10 feet and 20 is required . Planner, Wall suggested that Lowell Spr•i nger• pr•ovi de an over•vi ew ,of the project for, DRB . ' Jer'ry Bancroft asked why they want to do 'a PUD rather• than a typical R-3 development . Springer, said they saw the opportunity 1 to address alternative affor•dabl e housi.ng , and he noted that the property is allowed to occur, because surrounding Subdivisions created the per•i meter• . Spr•i nger• stated that thi s piece i s difficult to use effectively for, R-3 , so they thought -they could provide affor,dabl e family owned housing . Lowell Spr-inger, said this is a like the homestead project , which was fairly successful , however, he would like to see i ntegr•ati on of ages ' here . Spr,i nger• commented that this is npt an ,i magi nati ve site plan , but he thinks they can do something with landscaping and exter•ior's to make it interesting . He said the biggest problem is that they don ' t comply with r•equir•ed townhouse lot sizes . ' DRB discussed maximum density for, the acreage . •Jer•r•y Bancroft asked what happens on both sides of this pr•oper•ty . Spr•i nger• said there is a' tr•ai ler• court on the east and Pioneer, Court is on the ' west . Jer•r•y Bancroft stated that it is going to be very tight , and as the tr•ailer•s leave on the one side something else will go in , so the tightness concerns him . Springer, said he didn ' t feel ' that small rear• yard setback were that rare in townhouse projects he has worked on . He said they will definitely need to relax that cr•i teri a for, rear, yard setback's . Planner, Wall said those rear yard setbacks take effect , as they have to go by the applicable R-3 designation , since the removal of the specific townhouse cr•i ter•i a . Spr•i nger• asked if those standards still apply with PUD , because he didn ' t feel they have clone them that way in the past . He stated that PUD ' s .should beevaluated on their, merit , taking into consideration amenities and ' design qualities . .Jerry Bancroft stated that the purpose of the PUD is to look for innovative solutions to regulations , and he asked if Lowell would explore how he feels they meet those for- them . Lowell Spr•i nger• said he feels their- PUD recognizes front and rear- setbacks , and tries to meet the side setbacks , while doing something creative . He stated that they want to find out if this kind of an appr•o•ach has anything to offer, to allow relaxed standards through a PUD , and if so what does it have to trade off . ' •Jer•r•y asked what kind of advantages the project would offer, if they were to agree to the way they have calculated the length of the lot as the side. yarcl setback . Lowell said he feels that there is a need for, this type of housing at an affor•dabl e rate , and that is his number, one amenity . Bud Kumlien stated that he is not concerned about the density , but he is concerned about ' perceivable open space issues , and the availability of second access . Lowell said they will definitely have access on to 13-th . Bud also ' stated concern over' future development to the east . He stated that there is a need for, this type of housing ,' but as Wall has stated , there is nothing in the PUD criteria that allows DRB to ' address this type of deviation based on need . Bud said setbacks will need to be confirmed , but if DRC can accept the circulation he thinks they can do al of to dr•e,ss up the site thr•ougli landscaping and planting . Ellen Kr•eighbaum said she would like to see the creative things they plan to do with this lot . ' Springer, said he thinks they can use nice identifying features on the exter•ior•s to make these look like homes . Ellen expressed concern over, the pla.n to attempt to mix age groups in such small area and the narrowness of the roadways . Kumlien expressed concern over, the fact that there is no way to get out of this area on foot , without going out on to Babcock , but he realizes that is a City problem, not a development problem. Cliff asked if they were planning on development of an internal sidewalk . Jer•r,y Bancroft stated that the PUD cri ter•i a speal; to r•educing energy consumption and demand , and he wondered if they intend to have construction that address those issues . Lowell said they ar•e looking at R-Wall panels , with R30 in the walls and R40 or, 50 in the ceiling . He noted that if the site were ari cler• they could change things to u t i 1 i ze more energy efficiency , but they ar-e kind of forced into this strong north south alignment . Springer, explained the utility easements and their, r•el evince to adjoining pr•oper•ti es . Jer•r�y Bancroft asked if this development could be made to integr•ate with its neighbors in any way . Wade said there won ' t be any east/west integration . Jer•r•y said he would like to See logical places that could develop into peclestr•ian orientation in the future , be planned for- now. Jer,r,y said he would like to see more justification for, the PUD , in the form of internal amenities not typical for the R-3 di str•i ct . Spr•i nger• said they would need some way to deal with the mobile home area to encourage continuity . Bud said if they lined up with whet is existing at least they wouldn ' t block off the future possibility of having corgidoes between the developments . Cliff said the have looked at a piece of ro ert on the other, Y P P P Y side of Schwamegan before , and discussed some of these same I aspects . He felt that if there were pr•essur•e to coor-di hate the developments on a Planning level it would be beneficial in the long r•un . Springer, said it is a good point and he will look at the potential to do something peclestr•i an-wise . Ellen asked -if each side of the easement belongs to a property owner• . Lowell said no , it is common open space . Jer•r•y Bancroft asked if a commitment is made to the selling price in the covenants . Planner Skelton said that can ' t be clone , .and Wall added that he didn ' t feel they could consider, it as PUD cr•iter•ia . Jer-r•y Bancroft said if they can ' t hang their, hats on a fixed selling price , he has a problem with that . Kumlien said the environment .and location might dictate the selling price , and woul d rather, see this than another, r-ow of tr•ai 1 ers . Jerry said the effort is commendable , but he feels it still needs to be quality development . ' Springer, said he thinks that PUD criteria does address the selling price issues . Cliff said : it appears that this is an issues which falls outside of t-he Code , and they can ' t address ' those by the letter, of the. -.Cod. . Jerry said Spr.i nger, I s presentation needs to work toward the letter, of the Code . 1 i i i Cliff said he would like to see them address the issue of lar•ger- one open space , and he felt that the addressing of the rear• yards of the lots as si deyar ds of the pr-oper•ty is also a long shot , a.s that is not the function of the pr,oper•ty . Spr,i nger• said he feels it works effectively , because there is a private patio area created in the rear• , and it can ' t be kept affordable any other• way . Bancroft said affor•dabl e can not .take away from amenities that high density r,equi r,es . I SpH nger• said they ar•e tr•yi ng to develop v.ar•iation on the basic units , and plan to rotate the occur,r•ence of the units . Ellen Kr•eighbaum stated that she thinks these will appeal to young families at fi r•st , and given that there is. not alot of space for• children . Bud said green •space must be usable and not a bunch of small areas . Springer• said maybe they could take out a couple of units and create larger• open space . Bud said he WOLrld like to see that . Springer• asked if the application was worth pur-suing if he dealt with the issue of pr•ovi di ng additional open space . DRB said yes . �f s DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 23 , 1993 CARNEGIE BUILDING, 35 NORTH BOZEMAN 4 :00 P .M. i _ =DRB MEMBERSRQUESTEII TO ATTEND hNick Dav�.s , Ben _Tintirtger, J9hn DeHa`as . and_C .ff Ch�solm ZF.. YOU rARE=: UNABLTO .. ATTEND.--TINS T �w -= MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING OFFICE AND A BOARD MEMBER FROM THE ALTERNATE TUESDAY MEETING TO SERVE IN YOUR PLACE AND PROVIDE THAT PERSON WITH THE WEEKLY INFORMATION PACKET. CONSENT T AGENDA _ (The applicant is not required to attend the meeting, unless notified by noon on Tuesday that the item has been pulled from the consent agenda. ) 1 . J. Murphy - (Wall ) 23 East Main Certificate of Appropriateness application to allow the applicant to reduce . the size of the retail space through interior modifications . i PROJECT REVIEWS - 1 : KMBN BUILDING - ( Skelton) 4 : 00 p.m. North 7th - Certificate of Appropriateness application to allow the retail re-use of an existing building. 2C:ars"�onPl-acef ConceptPlan (Waxlsl)z_ 4 : 20 p.m. West Babcock between 11th and 15th PUD Concept Plan for 21 townhouses . INFORMAL REVIEW - 1 . Emerson Cultural Center 4 : 45 p.m. Review of Master Plan Assigned times are projected. Please arrive before the scheduled time in the event that the meeting runs ahead of schedule . This meeting is open to all members of the public . If you have a disability that requires assistance, please contact our ,' ADA Coordinator, Ron Brey, at 586-3321 , Extension 202 . Design Review Board = March• 23, 1993 Members Present : John DeHaas, Nick Davis, Ben Tintinger Staff Present : Planner Kevin Wall, Planner Dave Skelton, and Donna Havens, Secretary OahersaPrtesent Jim :Kaa:i1towski;xwit_h-4the Dep:ar.tmenaof- -State - ��.:���L ands �L o a e 11 �S�r- .e�D_'o�n--.B oe-- •a hn>...-: _;�- �:� Carson Place Concept Plan - Z-92154 West Babcock between llth and 15th - PUD Concept Plan for 21 townhouses . Planner Wall noted that the purpose of the Concept Plan review for PUD 's is to provide constructive feedback to the applicant before putting together the preliminary plan . Lowell Springer reviewed what was discussed at the previous meeting on this application before the DRB (see 12-8-92 DRB minutes in File #Z-92154 ) . He stated that the applicant is proposing to build alternative, low-cost housing. Lowell Springer stated that he feels a townhouse should not have minimum lot size requirements as long as it is possible to develop . He stated that he believes the right solution would be to provide a back and front yard spade and cluster the buildings to allow for larger open' spaces . ' Mr . Springer stated that, at DRB ' s suggestion, they have looked at the properties east and west of the subject. property . 1 He stated that there is a townhouse project'-to the west and to the east, and both of them have areas worked around pre-existing right-of-way and utility lines . He stated that there is _-a good potential for pedestrian easements to go to the surrounding areas, including the nearby mobile home park. Lowell Springer noted the changes on this plan, i . e . , lowering the height of the unit to feel less closed in and lowering the density by two . He stated that there is soon to be an alternative housing format for which exceptions can be made in return for making sure the housing cost is lower . He stated that the units are to cost no -more than $70, 000 . Responding to John DeHaas , Lowell Springer stated that each unit would have a garage and that there is room for another car to park on the, driveway . He stated that there should be no parking on the street . John DeHaas asked how that would be enforced , especially when residents have parties or visitors . Lowell Springer stated that the Homeowner ' s Association has the authority to enforce it and to fine people who do not abide by that restriction . John DeHaas asked how realistic that is, noting that if cars are parked 'on both sides of the street, the street becomes quite narrow. Lowell Springer stated that parking on the street does happen occasionally with other projects of this type . He stated that it may be possible to increase the DRB DRB - March' 23, 1993 Carson Place Concept Plan Review Page 2 amount of guest parking . Don Bockhahn stated that it would seem more appealing for young families if additional green space isq cr,-gated with `each townhouse- . rat-her than. i addtional d _ sp-ac _ - 27 John DeHaas stated that the structures are shown to be very close to the sidewalk . He suggested that a narrow casement be used on the front windows which would give the appearance of having a bad window and would avoid looking crowded . He also suggested having a continuous porch where there are combined entrances and encouraged putting a small gable roof over the doorways to give some width to the building as approaching it from the street . Responding to Ben Tintinger, Lowell Springer stated that the threshold is 1/2" . Ben Tintinger stated that if there was a step up, they could come into the center and ramp up either side ; also covering the threshold . Lowell Springer stated that he likes that idea, however, he does not want a tighter feeling to the sidewalk. Planner Wall referred to his comments in the Staff Summary regarding walkways and incorporating the landscape design into the walkways . ' Nick Davis suggested that the density be lessened by two to avoid overcrowding ', of the development . Don Bockhahn stated that further'reducing of the density would also reduce the cost feasibility of the project . Ben Tintinger, stated that he does not feel it is necessary to have the sidewalks right up to the curb, especially if the applicant is going to consider Staff 's comments that the street be emphasized through regularized placement of street Drees . John DeHaas stated that there is not too much space to work with on this land and because it is so narrow, he would suggest not having sidewalks if the development does a "first class job" with landscaping. Don Bockhahn stated that he would agree to that . Planner Wall state that sidewalks . would probably be required on one side . John DeHaas stated that would penalize one aide of the street and also take out trees on one side of the street . Ben Tintinger stated that- requiring a sidewalk on one side would not make sense because people are going to use the street to walk on and it would take away an area of landscaping. John DeHaas suggested that the units be trimmed in different colors . , Ben Tintinger stated that he foresees a problem with traffic moving too fast on the street . He suggested coming out with a slight curve, defined with landscaping, so pedestrians can get • 1 I �. DRB Mardi 23,' '.1993- ; Carson Place Concept Plan' Review Page 3 i out into the street without leaving the sidewalk. Lowell Springer stated that he liked that idea. He stated that he would �ratherdosomethin:g on that ordex -rathesr than ,putt ng:,- in -speed. � �bu.ImPs =; Ben T�intinger =sated _tha he �`u3�d'�I�'keoe the p1a� _ t address the comment made regarding- the=landscaping- -He= stated that he does not have too much to comment on regarding the architecture , adding that setting the garage doors back is a great help . John DeHaas stated that the more i ioht a-. ventilation they can incorporate into the front and back of the units, the less the units will look like substandard housing. . � Nick Davis stated that he would like to see small side windows on the . second story . Lowell Springer stated that might entail cutting the overhangs down . Board members stated they would not want the overhangs to be cut off . Ben Tintinger stated that he has seen examples where overhangs are not done and it can look nice . He asked that the issue remain open . Nick Davis also recommended side windows on the end units . John DeHaas stated that !the project should concentrate on design and the types of windows to keep it from looking substandard . He suggested that a site; model be built to get a better look at building form and shapes . i r _ r Development Review Committee March 16, 199-3 -�= Membe-,-s P�.�sent Fred Shild .., k<yle :H�ran , Hoge �i'c�', D-•v !d - -Cme're,ri ; F.hil.l. Ft-or bes '€. ,Dan­Figgins r - - Staff Present : Dave Ske'.1_ton ., Debb ie Ar 1 Terri `r'ir-a . Concept Flan Review - Carson Place Townhouses Lowell Springer and Don ,ck:hahn present. Lowell Springer stated that what they have done is take a look: at the property to the east and the retirement buildings which are the next piece of ground east of that, and try to incorporate pedestrian circulation ., ireduce density by two units and open up the corridors for pedestrian circulation to tie in with Schwamegan in the futurE . Lowell Springer stated that they are planning on more single! level homes than ,%jith the last informal_ and have addressed the: exterior elevations more thoroughly to create a better designed`; environment . Lowell stated that they! are still planning on townhouse lots, which wo!,ld require a deviation from the standard lot size for R- Zoning , but he believei that is an appropriate devia=i.on . as he doesn ' t- . ..think: touanhouses need the lot size regUlr-ed by the Zoning . L_owe1 Springer- said they have reached an agreement by which they can have tin ; access drive on the other property for emergen-cy services. Roger Sicz stated that it will regUire an actual easement from tha-: property owner. Springer said they can get that. Planner gall asked abtot_,t the possibility of extending the pedestrian L',talk:aaay to the sidewalk: on 13th. Lowell_ Springer said that WOUld be fine. Lowell also noted that to the west there are open areas., and the isles 0oL,1d align there in the future. Los,ell stated-that if DRe. encOUrages pedestrian wal!_.-ways on those "1 1 1 t i e,r e �i r; 1' -.t 1=. i t [..::I_I 1 1 �.d r-t__; 1 !�` C_I=: i:s t_ %1,?r; -L -;:_.�-,!---1 r_:l_ r A. Cj I i;._ i;' _. 1 ir!1__, for- th-:4.t- proper-t_y zit:-�fli=r t h a t the u:R5e there p r-cj i'?atily !;gin-; ' t cl­imanqe in the near fUt!_Ire, but -this pro?ect i rrnprove the_J access as will . Don Bock-hahn said owner , of t1-1-_.t other property' did give the impression that they wol_,ld be open to a greenway pedestrian access. La,,_11 Sprinl:.I-, s.t .tE.--d t;1:_? t the- criter-ia for- alterr!•_.tiv_ loiA cost ' housing was changing when he come in for his last informal , and he wondered about status of those changes. Planner Wall said he would have to review the amendments to see how that changed . Lowell Springer stated that he would be interested in knowing what Wall found out, as DRB and DRC both stated that once the appropriate language was there they COUld more adequate=y address the low cost housing issYes. G:) Lowell Springer stated that they are anticipating 4 trips per day"• average, Per unit and they are presently planning on _21 units s Fioger5 � _stated hzttlz :in ect�i� tVthnd Lcabrc'r �zlst _ n -oh ee:' Lo. ie1.:1 . Sp,r:2n�.�.,r.=tasted f--tract :bt:�c.l._.�cloe: n.�t_sc.em-- - too 'difficult to access, and he thinks the residents will !tse 19th, rather than 11th. Phill Forbes stated that they are "i c:r e ver _..re_ 1f!,dinq .�._f G__ t!_i r�-:!th 1�th, _ti iH I_;1 t.%m:=',t PlV yr-.�,"1�!_n rv:. <<a i_ i 1 be , _ r!1:: ;i y C!!_t{_" - :._ i; _!:=: r= - t h ? ri r:.F L:�.L l t I 1 e !- ! �- will be in his mind , Phill Forbes stated that if the CirCu.lation works for Dar. Fi ggir.s, thon it- is f i ne with him. Lowel 1 S!_�rir!ger- � stated that Clur.ing the last informal they were directed " tC, attempt to find more adequate Circulation , so they were trying to address that through this .proposal . Phill Forbr_s stated that he is less Concerned with emergency CirCulation than he is with day to day traffic . F;n!ger SiCC stated that thR town is just growing too fast for street and si.gnaliza-tion improvements. Lowell Springer said they woUld sign a Waiver of Rjight to Protest creation of an SID on improvements when it has tb be done. Si cz said the issue is that he has never seen one called in , Phill Forbes stated that it. is fr!tstrating ,, but it also hard to carry the banner to connect -the streets, as with 1•1- th . Roger Sidi stated that 15th needs to qC throUgh from-hlai n Str_,r+ and -he will p1_�sh for. ,; th-st. He noted that th i s i s not a bad development., it just causes another traffic issue. Planner Wall said the rear yard'- setback: issues are the same as 'dUri ng informal . Fred Shields stated that the water main needs to be shown on the correct side of the street. Planner Wall stated that lot coverage, setbacks and length of the units are still concerns. Roger SicC asked if Curb and gutter on Babcock. COUld be handled through profiles since they are going to widen it in the near future. Phill Forbes stated that they Could dis-Cuss that. . -- - � - - - - - - - - - C. �_ - -.n._. t! - _-= i - 1. Col'-itlnl.linC1 'to go PUD, since pr ovidinq d� i =he e;':'tr d aili?f'I:...'�: ? i• e te=•t.=d t.,ii k:h a. PUD _n i n q to be tough to do with this � Project. i LROZEMAN : FIRE DEPARTMENT F.O. Bo ; 64U BOZEhIAN, MT 59771-i 64(� F'HON- (406) r86-6219 REC'E* PLC BY BOZEMAN Deve'1-opment=.Rev.i*ew Comrtrttee � = - -- - FROM: Dan Figgins, Fire Marshal DATE RE: r &L'9- viJl_� a-ILI, Ja II BOZEMAt ~ CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE BOZEMAN 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE CITY-COUNTY P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 JPLANNING OFFICE PHONE:(406)586-3321 Ext. 227 Lowell Springer Springer - Group r .,.^...vini "�;s � u.i•.h- y�a .�?< •. ..� . st-w �c^v1 rum Y r Y f xS — — 1 _r)ril ..1993 Dear The DRC and DRB minutes fiom the last concept review for Carson Place Townhouse PUD are enclosed , as well as some comments from Dan Figgins , Fire Marshall . Please call me if -you have_' anS. gU?stions . Si Jc:erel-,- , t ke in Wall , CDT :associate Pl ginner/Urban cc : Don Bochhahn, 1500 MOUntain Goat Trail i � � E i i r . r . JOINT ACCESS AGREEMENT r THIS AGREEMENT which is made this LL day of _ , 1994, by and between Donald Bockhahn, Bozeman, Montana, and R. Lee Woodriff, B zeman, Montana, and AlexiS Parlova and Janet Parlova, Half Moon Bay, California, as follows: WHEREAS the parties to this agreement own adjoining residential properties which'are situated in the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, consisting of Carson Place Townhouses and '�yu Trailer Court; r WHEREAS the parties believe it to be of mutual benefit to share a joint access between' two properties for the purpose of emergency egress for the residents and emergency personnel:: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the parties to this agreement do hereby agree to share all the rights, responsibilities an control over a 26 foot wide joint access traversing between properties and referred to on the plat of the properties which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth rin this Agreement; ' FURTHERMORE, the parties agree to be jointly responsible for all maintenance or liability which may arise from use of the access by residents of either party and each party to r this Agreement does hereby agree to allow use of said access by the residents of both parties to this Agreement. rDATED this day of 1994. CARSON PLA O N SES BY. DATED this day of 5a . , 1994. TRAILER COURT BY: r ' S r I r ' ACCESS EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT 1 We, Lex Parlova, and Lee Woodriff, the GRANTORS, in consideration of One ' Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, do hereby grant to the Donald Bockhahn, 1500 Mountain Goat Road, Bozeman, MT 59715, GRANTEE, his successors and assigns, a perpetual easement to construct, maintain, use, and access through as necessary for utilities, street improvements, walks, and all related improvements and uses, across the western portion of Tract 27 in the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 ' of section 12 Township 2S Range 5E, centered on the centerline of the northernmost end point of the existing right-of-way for South 13th Avenue, extending to West Babcock Street, said area of land having a total width of 48.02, and a length of 660 feet, situated in Gallatin County, Montana. ' The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A, which by this reference is made a part hereof. This grant includes the right of the GRANTEE, his successors, permittees, licensees, and assigns and their agents and employees, to enter at all times upon the above-described easement and to construct all or portions of a city standard street, utilities and related ' appurtenances using methods and routes causing the least damage and inconvenience to the GRANTORS in order to establish and use the access across this easement: i ' (1) Construct, operate, patrol, repair, substitute, remove, enlarge, replace, and maintain the access way, and appurtenances; (2) Trim, remove, destroy, or otherwise control any trees and brush inside or outside the ' boundaries of the easement which may, in the opinion of the GRANTEE, interfere or threaten to interfere with or be hazardous to the construction, operation and maintenance of the easement; ' (3) Grade the land subject to this easement and extend the cuts and fills of this grading into and on the land adjacent to that which is subject to this easement to the extent GRANTEE may find reasonably necessary; and ' The GRANTEE agrees: (1) That, in connection with the construction, operating patrolling, repairing, replacing, and maintaining of said easement and improvements, he will repair or replace, at his sole expense, any damages to appurtenances of said land that may be disturbed. (2) To construct and maintain said easement in such manner as will not hinder the use of the tract to which this right of way is hereby granted. ' The GRANTORS agree that: (1) At no time will they build, construct, erect or maintain any permanent structure other than those described above within the boundaries of said easement. (2) The GRANTOR warrants that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the real property described above, that they have a lawful right to convey the property, or any part of it, and that they will forever defend the title to this property against the claims of all persons. (3) The GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges herein ' granted without any interruption by the GRANTORS. The terms, covenants and provisions of this easement and agreement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Date: Accepted by: ' Lex Parlova Lee Woodriff Grantor Grantor ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. ' County of ) On this day of 19 , before me, a Notary Public for ' the State of California, personally appeared Lex Parlova and Lee Woodriff, known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. ' In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal on the day and year first written above. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Residing at ' My Commission expires SEAL 1 LANDSCAPE LEGEND STORM1,l1lATER RETENTION CALCS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.7 I SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME PLANTTEJG MATURE SIZE OTY - SURFACE AREA (EXG.k AREA (DEV.) COEFFICIENT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL euILDiNc 0 17,090 95 ACER PLATANOIDES NORWAY MAPLE 2'GAL.BtB SOFT. 8 - -----_.__—'._---__- ___--.._-_. _.._--._...-_-_- -.-- __ .-_-_"_..__-_..—.`--.. PAVING 0 15,414 .85 gp GRAVEL 0 0 .60 - GRASS 87,083 54,579 .20 WEST MAIN ST. (US 191) FRAXINUS 1112'-2' RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS - <- GREEN ASH 50 FT. 19 - EXISTING SITE C- .200 $ PENNSYLVANICA GAL B+B '--F— -------__-- T--- - "—" "-"--" DEVELOPED SITE-C=.462 O JUNIPERUS SABINA TAM JUNIPER 18'-24' 3 FT. 150 - - Ox.95)+(Ox.85)+(87,o83x.20)_.200 (17,090x.95)+(15,414x.85)+(54,579x.20)= 462 TAMARISCIFOLIA !I ____.__ -., .______- . . . ... _ ( 87,083 87,083 I. PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF-10 YR.STORM It. DEVELOPED SITE RUNOFF- 10 YR.STORM p- PRUNUS X CISTENA PURPLE LEAF PLUM 2'GAL.B•HB 8 FT. 15 - SITE SLOPE-1% SITE SLOPE-1% ivi v it TRAVEL DISTANCE-630' TRAVEL DISTANCE- 630' Eye I I C= .200(PRE-DEVELOPED SITE) C=.462(DEVELOPED SITE) Tc= 42 MIN.(FIG. 22) Tc=30 MIN.(FIG.22) • SETBACK AREA= 40,081 S.F. SITE CALCULATIONS - - �- --- _ - - •- ,PER HR. .65 I- .41 IN.PER HR. I- .41 IN --- I -- TOTAL AREA-87,083 S.F. AREA %OF TOTAL -- I-.- PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF IS: `-�; ❑4 I, I_.. Q .2 Oa(.41) �u �z/Ac) =.16 CFS --EXISTING RUNOFF TOTAL AREA MINUS SETBACKS 47,002 S.F. 100% _ 1 _ - DEVELOPED RUNOFF IS: OPEN AREA MINUS SETBACKS 29,912 S.F. 647 I s"S. --- o=CIA 0e3 -38 F DEVELOPED RUNOFF I( - .462 .41) \.a:eo nz/Ac) CFS LANDSCAPE AREA MINUS SETBACKS 14,498 S.F. 31% I LANDSCAPE AREA WITH SETBACKS 54,579 S.F. 63% m I.REQUIRED RETENTION VOLUME®.16 CFS RUNOFF(EXISTING) T� ¢ PAVED AREA 15,414 S.F. 33% CARSOi`, _ 6 QHEQUAMEGQN Pr v� REaurRm REm+noN r�.r,�21 :�nr. 4J Ill — 3 VALLEY OF PLACE ❑ VILLAGE P.0 D �, TIME HR / iz BUILDING AREA 17,090 S.F. 36% E FLOWERu� 2 so is nao �/f] . I REQUIRED REIN `ELATION VOLUME®.60 CFS RUNOFF(DEVELOPED) c) 1 TIME HR I SEC. /OF MIN. VOWME(F13) � T J v 2 60 .38 2726 .. - W 1 W 0 i - v) r I � I ❑3 i j � I _ _f l � � N 6 s .. 10 ❑B I o �I 7 - la.l II 9 REF ADJOINERS ZONING I ;� ORAN`S j _ I- - N� RRC-- I I - - NORTH: ❑1 MARY FRANCESCA PALFFY B-2 I- :_-._ C/O H.A.BOLINGER(BOX 1047) I f—ARRVA�NC MENT OF—�- -- ARRANG MCNT OF r - COR .__ BOZEMAN,MT.59715 S' SIDE I -- --I i .. _ INEE •SIDE 1 ; ON I F ADDITION WEST: Dfl CAROL J.GRAYBILL R-3 AD ITI - -- 1328 W.BABCOCK i —! -- -- BOZEMAN,MT.59715 ,J J WEST KO H ST. Ij 3 LUTHER&NELOC K.REEL R-3 1336 W.BABCOCK Ieg' BOZEMAN,MT.59715 L) TO MN,P9 132'0' fnOM PROP.MNE TO'Ili i2 196'-0• RM EL 480k35 FA INE R EL 419G 01 NM.- 796.20 R E_n96a0 ❑4 RICHARD E.DWIGHT R-3 li _ �E%SIT.WO w MAIN 1320 W.BABCOCK MAN MT 59715 N(659.45') .. —.. BOZEMAN, - 78.27' ❑ 36�00' 22.00' 22.0 22.00' 22.00 37.06' �7.00j �22.00' 22.00' 31 62' J 7 31.62' 22.00" 22.00' 37.011' 317.00 22 00' 22.00' 22.00' 36.00' S 4' I HERITAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION R-3 E _ c a c c _ E c. --- --- --- c ---- E - -�Y I C/O JOHN S.FRENCH JR.(218 PIONEER DRIVE) ---- - - -- ., -- --- !i-` - �- --t- - - -- - t ---- 1 --- --- - --- ——— - - L } r B T.59715 I I - - I �•,1/ BOZEMAN.M • I �� ��' -- I I ` kBIKEP j �� —I--- ._I... 1 I I - _ T�RE NAREA ❑ - AIx REDES I zn c Er. e m I EAST: 6 KATHRYN H.CONSER R 3 }3 ' 1216 W.BABCOCK I c qL BOZEMAN.MT.59715 R.LEE WOODRIFF&ALEXIS PARLOVA R-3�'`:o0 d. ,NN•� 521 W.GRANT ST. BOZEMAN,MT.59715 SOUTH: ❑8RALPH AND MARION W.CHALLENDER R-3 222 S. 13THBOZEM T.59715- - ---:L AN M: : IMIKE STEINER R-3I304 S. 13TH I[L I BOZEMAN,MT.59715 78.27'� 36. 0 I 22 I 2 0'I 22 2 0'I 13 Q' 47 'I 122 11 2 D' 131 2' 31F . 2'I 22 I 2 0'I i3 Q 122 136 5 4' 1 11 - ( ❑ )ei � I _ II Ea N ur u-� c ��•� -•I--t 66000)� `') 3 I SOUTHWEST. 221^ES 13TH D MARLENE SHORT R-3 ,1-,•- v - - �,.rr sE MA - Ns OZE T 59715 5 11I�' _ 4 TAW ss c0 10 -•I-W _L� —,4 I.' «I—\_I_ —W—_ , I II I N a 5. I I S,6•WA MAN 13TH AVE S. \ o— ---- --SL--� —' J 5-- -- — — -5— ' �— — —�--�' IT T --'C- "-'j-- r - _ I P r 11 JARVIS AND SUE ANNE BROWN R-3 -- - -�--- ENr j- --- �-aRB k CUTIEf- ( lo}CNT- -y I 6ao wAien MAN I I 305 S.13TH 4 '\ I 'I I arr rc eozeMAN I I BOZEMAN,MT.59715 1 CONNECT ro AEXhT. --a-r N - 12 JANET D.BERTI 0 R 3 ---1---'- 6°_--- ------------ -- -I --------- --------- -- f -I- ---------- r ------- - -- 309 S.13TH I- - -I---- T I b I �Mn.�ea.eiE I I �• �I� I -I_ I I I I BOZEMAN.MT.59715 - I R EL 4]99.19 I I PRO MH.MN i20 I I I RN EE 79- I 1 R EL 4]9).56 JAMES F.&ALICE T.SARGENT R-3 I� I I I I I I 222 S.14TH r+ I I I 1 I BOZEMAN,MT.59715 A OVERALL SITE PLAN ���j I I I I F7 /V I I I I ' I 14 J.ROGER&SriV7A D.MCCORMICK R-3 �I I 306 S. 14TH: �, Al I'=30'-0" - I I I I I- I I BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 I 1 I I I IR I I I I I ► i 15 EARL J.&JANICE M.PEACE R-3 Ii 310 S. 14TH ('V II BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 QO I I I I I r I I I I I I iti PREAPPLICATION FOR TOWNHOUSE SUQDIVIS,ON PLAT CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT Vj I OF STREETS < g WE,THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS,DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT '� ) CA O PLACE T U ti 9 �c A�18 X U1 CAUSED TO BE SURVEYED,SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED INTO LOTS,BLOCKS, f STREETS AND ALLEYS.AS SHOWN BY THE PLAT AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY � INTO HEREUNTO INCLUDED,THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND,TO-WIT: 0 3 A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE E 1/2,SW 1/4,OF SECTION 12.T2S, 9 R5E,M.P.M.,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED V BEING A TRACT OF LAND As BEGINNING � _ �+ M.P.M. BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET SOUTH OF A POINT 660 FEET EAST OF THE LOCATED IN THE E 1/2, SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, 2S, R5E, MM NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE E 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12.TOWNSHIP GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA 2 SOUTH,RANGE 5 EAST,M.P.M. H WHICH POINT OF BEGINNING IS SET AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 660 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING WEST 132 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING NORTH 660 FEET L.................1 [....___-_-__-,._-_------ -I TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING EAST 132 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. � x l._--__--_-J ' i y 6 I I I I i 1 E 1/2 OF SW 1/4 THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IS TO BE KNOWN AS"CARSON PLACE ' NERITAAE conoo AssoOAnaN ' ' TOWNHOUSE SUBDIVISION",CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY, ,1 c/o,0nn s.IrwNa m. ' OF SECTION 12 " NW CORNER Of MONTANA; AND THE LANDS INCLUDED IN ALL THE STREETS,AVENUES, '—NW 4.....___.._y 218 PIONEER O5.7N. 1 wpm - -------a EXIST.MH-79 (R-3 ZONING) EXIST.MH-2 _ R ma!^wB e.ovnc"T T25, R5E M.P.M. ALLEYS AND PARKS OR PUBLIC SQUARES SHOWN ON SAID PLAT ARE Bo2EunN,4T s9T15 ,._ 1 1 132B xEST BABOOCK ' '-^^-^-J , "-"' HEREBY GRANTED AND DONATED TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN FOR O! STA.3+95 STA.3+20 - r THE PUBLIC USE AND ENJOYMENT. , BOZEMAN,4T 59T5 INV.=98.14' INV.=98.48' i ' I w NEW UN DATED THIS- -DAY OF A.D.19 o�z ,� ,' P .i' NEW 1-1/2'-� �• , UNDERGROUND�� - 1 7 I GAS SERVICE I I ' - ELECTRICALSERVICE ` N(659.45') BY MPC ' ! _ -----+/.^ -- BY MPC XXXED -- SE ..—.. —.�.. ..�_.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7✓112T 4 36�00' 22.00' 22.00� 22.00' 22.00 37.0' .00' 22.00' 22.00 31.62 31.62 22.00' 22.00' 37.0 .00'• ;'22.W' 22.00' 22.00' 36.00' 5. 4' c - - a - -— -__ ° _.— —- _- - - e--e - •_-- -—}— -C--�--- _- SIGNED Q' — ��� — -- — — — I z - - T . - 1 1 •~• % I I I I I 1 ( .... I I { I + I \ I I•'� 11 F o m I STATE OF MONTANA F SI t t y ,Q t L4�4 LQU LOT 2 1 14I 1 I I x= 13 - Z I l0T 19; LOT 18 7 LQUZ LOT 16 LOT 15 LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT 10 40T 9 LOT B LOT 7 COUNTY OF GALLATIN i - COMMON OPEN SPACE 4032 , 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 4144 S.F. 4144 S.F. .2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 3542 S.F. 3542 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 4144 S.F. 41144 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F,,2464 S.F. 4032 S.F. I 'o 8766 S.F. I (PHASE 1)\ (PHASE 1)I(PHASE 1)I(PHASE.I) (PHASE I) (PHAS 1) (P ASE IQ. f(PHASE II)I(PHASE II)I (PHASE II) I (PHASE-4)--I(PHASE'11)(PHASE II)I (PHASE II) (P ASE.III)_-I(PHASE III)I(PHASE III4(PHASE III A. (PHASE III) I y W 1 •o ON THIS—DAY OF IN THE YEAR -BEFORE { aII fi o I (PHASE 1) o a o; o f o• o• t a o• o f. o• o• o f ME- PERSONALLY APPEARED DONALD N $ g o o $ o' BOCKHAHN,KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE OWNERS THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN { g N N r-••sa i - a - _ .c• INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME. �I i 0► -1 �I �I �I �I �=III �, w mI � _ 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY i 1 z 1p-~ OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR IS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. Q , a I I I I I I I I I In _ f I I I I I w THIS � r AT— MY COMMISSION a�a8 � I V MY COMM SS ON _ ! FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA � I 10 I ^78.2T 36 0'I 22 O' 22. O'I 22 O'I 22 0'-I 137 0' 3T 0'I 22 0' I'22 0' 31. 2' 31. 2' ,22„0 I 122. 0'I 1 0' 3700'II 22 0'{ 122 O' 122 0' -` 1 36 0. 5 4' l CO � A o _ _ __ _ _ _ __ 30 00' I - WE,THE UNDERSIGNED MORTGAGEE,DO HEREBY JOIN IN AND CONSENT TO z _ I .. I .._.. - - v -^— —�—����'��� �� �.���•- �� 4 -��-# -�-�� �-�t �. S 860.0:� � I—�� t � -�- O THE DESCRIBED PLAT,RELEASING OUR RESPECTIVE LENS,CLAIMS OR i O ENCUMBRANCES AS TO.ANY PORTION OF SAID LANDS NOW BEING PLATTED p' I N -.}-w O.B. 1 N INTO STREETS,PARKS OR OTHER PUBLIC USED AND DEDICATED TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER. NEW 6 I P ('7 I I WATER MAIN ok WATER MAIN r� y-� of I I INEW MANHSTA.6+350 E... �'+�`-.EXIS�ING 10• �� (R-3 Z;O' ]ING) N I I _ 60 0 EASEn1E T - - NEY�MA HOLE U X%XXX%XXX%XXXX'S BANK OF BOZEMAN,, •- NEW 8' STA +'S5 - FOR BA6COCKTIINV=98.81' SEWIIR INSEWER MAIN INV. 7188' 7 STATE OF a I B ! .. -_...._-.. ......_.-... ....._...... ... ....... I ,-�"`✓` T -� I.0 7 _ -I EXIST. H-3 ;EXISTING 8" --- ---� -------I - --- COUNTY OF MONTANA GALLATI I [._.._..•r ,--'"'-'E ,..__... r'-„_'" r__...-I 1 1.........,.y ,.,_..__ ,.. ... STA.6+90 . 1 . IN -...uSEWER MAIN' - EXIST.MH BO--I''/ I i RIFE wO0AT I k AIE%1511EALOVA V.-97.96' I ........... STA.7+95 1 o 521 W.ONANT STREET ON THIS__DAY OF_____IN THE YEAR BEFORE ) �I INV�-99.26± XISL 40'-D"Jc i XIST.'30'-0"715 ME __PERSONNALY APPEARED !Ii ' I ' EASEMENT '; i .i EASEMENT , --, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE OF THE BANK THAT EXECUTED EXECUTED THE S INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCHBANK a 1 I IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I HEREUNTO SET MY HANG AND AFFIXED MY I 1 EOF, HAVE ---"-------------._ OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR IN THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE --- 1 WRITTEN. I I I 1 I . I 1 ; ' 1 1 I ; 1 t I I e 1 1 � i I ' i • , RY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA .. _.._....-_.__. _._._..._...-_'. .._____ ____.__ _... _....__ .___._-..._.__...........__._.._. I L_ i-.._ _.__ _.......I_............__ _.._...._..... .. ._ .. .......... ......._. 1..........I _.__ ,. .__.__ -_..__ ...... _..._.._..... .._._. ..._ ..........._.._...... .. _...___. _. .......a MYSCOMMISSION EXPIR ES ENLARGED VICINITY MAP 0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR . ........... 7 I,THE UNDERSIGNED,RON ALLEN.PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT BETWEEN_-_ 19_, B6AlIOR HK;iH tiCF100L Q AND 19_�I SURVEYED THIS AMENDED SUBDIVISION ' ----- ------ AND PLATTED SAME AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND AS NEST MAIN ST.(US t9t) �- VLrL—.��1 DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE MONTANA I NORTH SCnLCI"=30'-0'. SUBDIVISION AND AND PLATTING ACT, SECTIONS 76-3-101 THROUGH ff .-- — --.--- 76-3-614. M.C.A.,AND THE BOZEMAN AREA SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. I 11 DATED THIS—DAY OF__ A.D.,19- -� •FOUND REBAR WITH CAP AS NOTED. 0 SET 5/8'x 18"REBAR WITH CAP. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR _. MONTANA REGISTRATION NO. CLERK AND RECORDER - �-h '., F DEVELOPER /OWNER L _ .......... } { CERTIFICATE Of PLANNING DIRECTOR L) DONALD BOCKHAHN DATE: FEBRUARY 8,1996 I, SHELLEY CHENEY,CLERK AND RECORDER OF GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA, -- ---- 'L BOZEMAN,MT 59715 Li DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FILED I,ANDY EPPLE,PLANNING DIRECTOR,OF THE CITY—COUNTY PLANNING ' I IN MY OFFICE AT O,CLOCK,(A.M. OR P.M.). THIS DAY OF BOARD HAVE REVIEWED THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND FIND THAT TOTAL GROSS AREA: 83,124 S.F. A.D.199—AND RECORDED IN BOOK__,OF PLATS IT CONFORMES TO THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS --- - r '�'� I^ ON PAGE___,RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER,GALLATIN COUNTY, .76-3-101 THROUGH 76-3-614.M.C.A.,AND THE BOZEMAN AREA VALLEY OF PLACE _ 1 VILLAGE RUD - NET AREA: 67,824 S.F. MONTANA. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. ...__L- DATED THIS DAY OF A.D.19_. '-- - --- CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS DOCUMENT NUMBERS I, PHILIP FORBES THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE,CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, CLERK AND RECORDER PLANNING DIRECTOR I- y DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE"PLAT OF CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES" CITY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD i TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN.COUNTY,MONTANA,IS WITHIN THE CITY Of BOZEMAN MASTER PLAN AREA AND CAN BE PROVIDED WITH MUNICIPAL - € ALL AREAS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND OUTSIDE THE INDIVIDUAL SOLID ES FOR THE SUPPLY Of WATER AND DISPOSAL IO SEWAGE AND LOT BOUNDARIES Y+1LL BE COMMON SPACE OWNED EQUALLY BY CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE SOLID WASTE. THEREFORE UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 76-4-124(1), � E' 1 � THE NINETEEN LOTS. CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER ....... � � �E_ � _-- .: � - THIS TRACT IS NOT SUBJECT TO SANITARY RESTRICTION CLEARANCE. - -' I,PHILIP FORGES THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE, { W. - CERTIFICATE OF INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS - I, STAN HUGHES,TREASURER OF GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA, OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA,DO HEREBY CERTIFY f DATED THIS DAY OF A.D.,19_� DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS BEEN THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS BEEN DULY EXAMINED < -Fes- DULY EXAMINED AND THAT NO REAL PROPERTY TAXES ASSESSED AND HAVE FOUND THE SAME TO CONFORM TO THE LAW, Af?B _ I,THE UNDERSIGNED, __, DO HEREBY CERTIFY 0 AND LEVIED ON THE LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED ARE DELINQUENT. APPROVE IT,AND HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF f .THAT BETWEEN 1992 AND -1992,THE BOZEMAN FOR PUBLIC USE OF ANY AND ALL LANDS SHOWN ON i { REQUIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS WERE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE _ - - THE PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED TO SUCH USE. cV � - I-= Sr� 'MTH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.NS. PHILLIP d.FORBES - - h� DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE DATED THIS DAY OF A.D.,19— JTWEST L -�.� DATED THIS_DAY OF A.D.,19____u CITY OF BOZEMAN TREASURER OF GALLATIN COUNTY K 5T. 1.......- .._ ....... ......:...... ....:. .. ..._. ...:......._.... ...:._......_.. .............. A _ DIRECTOR OF.PUBLIC SERVICE � ZQ �y 11 0 11 0" 10 5 1/2" 11 6 1/2 w S ti LIVING ROOM DINING ROOM BEDROOM#1 II I ----- b w i ------------------ KITCHEN LAV. j I z - 1 � a 0 Z i LIV L"I -- � . Q BEDROOM#2 W I SITTING rT} N 'I GARAGE —iL1 7 560 S.F. 640S.F. {{ ' �� G> ' �. �-.a {♦..yam" � k Y .. -- - FIRST FLOOR PLAN (TYPICAL) SECOND FLOOR PLAN (TYPICAL) C t i ,I li k i i Gl eV C'A 100 l z ._ ...f.l Ili ..I. 1 !.1L LJ I. !.IL l ....., .._,. _=f,L; it,11 I� ',-!1 _ r:L_'li_I_J_L}J_, 1 �.f1 ..1�1 _1'TiJ.Tl.1 T- .. .Ii1.ITl rn.LLL :,IL1;Fri, +.Lr: .1.,+ i71.i r.LII: illl_7,IT,', rl..e_'.:.i.l:.:.It PiJ. _ _-! 1PI f.I 1lL1111 I 7I 7 I 1 L`1'I C Ll I 1 1 I I-J L C]1 _ ! 1_' 1 l l t 1 T l l J l 1, ... ,_lI ,:..tFl ll, - -- - .,.1.•_,1>.,TfLl_!I.J� U.I.I rL `L '. ll�ll LII [I 1:EI)7,1 i.17L1,.1 � C7_�. :7 ,t � T�.l,l. I I L__ 1, 1 ._I. I. tl< L r .I,. .._ ''if_r.l.Jf'11J'I]It'I Tit-II� Sif f ll rf i r ,11 �. fJ .LIT: Tii.rrl_-letIII IIITiiCli l Illli,lil l.lfl., LflIII6lf, . T.Ii I ! E17 i _J 1,. hI i.�.l.i 1.�.1...1.11.1.L. .11.j.1 .11,...11.1_I r C{'4. .Ll {. _l .11.1..t .I,. _l� }..L.I.+11,.1.1.! JI. fLII-�-IT'I` il �Ll'.I I�Pi`-lI i _fl :SL !-1�.�_CL. l Lli .iL PI f!-.�a ..f 11_.-P..tLii.11T 4[i. II ,... ll.r'.II. 5_.r F.,..Il 4.. .i.. I_.11l�[I.' {_I _PL. .I_+I IrL T.-T.. 7�>'.5...TTr''II IE_�. I IL,L<' I L_LII 1 J;l_�._ i +;1E lli l!i. !PI t 1 '. � I r[.i_C:lai '1 .lT 11I_::I . .I,Y...I7l _L!Tf .I].1I�L,T�L CI 1.r I.]!1!.L 1�T _iLf_ I 1 t _,, 1 7� r� J .. �I-=7r� �r � T - �. it L�,{,1-� L�,` i.I.R..I..i t:..If,1 11 I_Ir��TI� r Y1 " ;W Ii.11f1!131 II.t llr I:1j if_lrll.f1TiC,:r,. ,TCL1._tLlr� T-7�ITITI LTI�_L 7. Tl); I 1rr.A-1 ,T 1.li_I r 1 ,�j�'I L1]L l,z� 7. j-r Ir r, 1 1..,I I.1 I F 1 r 7:. r. 1T1 I.•1 TE.•� 1 yT L l,.rrr l.J a 17. f _ Il UL I� ll U7T tl7f 1L _�_LI fT IT1S1 1.1 .. . I. Crl. .t7. ]_ .. 1 �1t to �rL ,7. ��L L ._ . L� I l r l r�1 iiUl,! [�Sr'tC 'l I I.1 111 L,..11.1 r,_rl f rL_2r71,1.1 1 !3 1 _t r y I-'_1 f l rl.l: 1,�..1 L ll I L. I;!; a.'lT. I,I i Lid ------ : I I: -------- - ---_ ` C . _ _—_.. L___. — _ —__ - __.— Yw l Ilyl _Y-__— l-fCl. . LIT-IC:_LF i _ �L I •-- --- J7.,.[II IIL.ITL:I, T. ---- -- 9 '-" I:1fi_I_f�.IT - :LTLI., I` y qI + I � I;, ��:— � �: _J 1 i I — 1I l.i:✓d1 Fl iL .. 1 �,IH II J9� _ . l �r=���� _ If- TYPICAL fi�I r�`' dN f1IFFt4 FRONT ELEVATION 1/a' = 1' A4 -- —-- - , a TYPICAL END ELEVATION 1/4" = 1• � � j PREL@jI CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT INARY TOWNHOUSE SUBDIVISION PLAT - - r J, � n pp 1,nnn,,A\ It THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS,DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT w g D INTO LOTS,BLOCKS, m A 9 N PLACE T®"j�V i`\I H O U, STREETSSAND ALLEYSED TO BE ,AS SHOWN BY THE DPLAT AND AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 5 1 INTO HEREUNTO INCLUDED,THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND,TO-WIT: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE E 1/2,SW 1/4,OF SECTION 12,T2S, ,•�1� R5E,M.P.M.,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED V AS FOLLOWS BEING A TRACT OF LAND BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET SOUTH OF A POINT 660 FEET EAST OF THE � 4 LOCATED IN THE E 1/2, SRN 1/4 Or SECTION 12, T2S, R6E, M.P.M. NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE E 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12,TOWNSHIP IO- 2 SOUTH,RANGE 5 EAST,M.P.M.AT WHICH POINT OF BEGINNING IS SET AN GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ANA IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 660 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE -( i RUNNING WEST 132 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING NORTH 660 FEET ,..„_._.. ....... r__.._,._-_-_-_ __.r------ - TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING EAST 132 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. t i i THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IS TO BE KNOWN AS"CARSON PLACE - r - � wwrtAOE caKOO AssoaAncn i i OF 2 I 82 OF w /4 TOWNHOUSE SUBDIVISION",CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY, , c/o aoN!1 s TRwa�e. : r OF CORNER 1Oe 2 MONTANA; AND THE LANDS INCLUDED IN ALL THE STREETS,AVENUES,21M NW ` BOEMAR,uT 59715 EXIST.MH-79 EXIST.MH-2 Rloo L OWWT T2S,R5E M.P.M. ALLEYS AND PARKS OR PUBLIC SQUARES SHORN ON SAID PLAT ARE -I STA.3+95 (R-3 ZONING) STA.3+2D ;-------- '320 weWEST BABCOCIC -------.,--_1 ' t OOZE...KT sans HEREBY GRANTED AND DONATED TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN FOR INV�98.14' INV.-96.48' THE PUBLIC USE AND ENJOYMENT. zo ao g`' 7 NEW 1-1/2" '�' ° i o^ NEW UNDERGROUND DATED THIS DAY OF A.D. 19__. - P GAS SERVICE I r , ' ELECTRICAL SERVICE XX N(659.45') -BY MPC I I I - ---J BY MPC /9 SIGNED I. V78.27' 4E 3•BAO' 22.00 22.007 22.00' 22.00' 37.0 .00 22.00' 22.00 31.62' 31.62 22.00' 22.00' ,37.0 '- -• .00'•`__/22.00' 22.00' 22.00' ••36.00' ` 4' SIGNED - I ------ ------ -- ----- -- ---� --�------ -- - -- ------ --- -- - --- ------ --- ----_ ---i o t R FT I ---- r- i I �, r f I I - r . I zw I Q F I STATE OF GALLATIN [-y I LOT 19 LOT to ' LOT t7 LOT 1g LOT LOT 12 t LOT 11 LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 LQLZ LQi4 LOT 3 LOT 2 LOLL t I x� COUNTY OF GALLATIN i COMMON OPEN SPACE 4032 S.. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2484 S.F. 2464 S.F. 4144 S.F 4144 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 3542 S.F. 3542 S,F. ,2464 S.F 2464 S.F. 4144 S.F. 044 S.F. .2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F, 4032 S.F. _ ° of 8766 S.F. I (PHASE I) i(PHASE QI(PHASE Qi(PHASE I)j(PHASE Qf (PHAS 1 (PI}ASE I) h(PHASE QI(PHASE Q (PHASE Q I (PHASE-q_-I{PHASE-�){PHASE I)I (PHASF�Q (P ASE 11)---I(PHASE IQ(PHASE II)I(PHASE IQ, (PHASE IQc1 c ON THIS DAY OF IN THE YEAR BEFORE II 1 N (PHASE 1) o0 o!-..�, oo - I ` o• I o ! I ` ME PERSONALLY APPEARED DONALD E l S �� I o I g g., g o g g $ I o I g g• g g g n o N o BOCKHAHN,KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE OWNERS THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN U �• N N N N O C O O O O O N O N I O O O O O = O,M �`-• _1 I i i i I I 1 t ^I I I 'I `I N I \ ^I a I 1 q I INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME. f, I n vI � �� a .3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY ' N I OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR IN THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. Z Ma-------- Ma -- --. -- --I---- - -- l w NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA — --- --- _ — _ c _ I z�aS ——— I �LII 11 iII -----�- i I- I--I -1----I I -I--- i----I-- -;�- -I- �F== I __;.._��y I- -�--�,.-I--- , --�- _ N I r ,._. RESIDING AT_ -MY COMMISSION EXPIRES— EXISTING F.H. �\ t- t 78.27 1 36 b' a2(00' �2.)'JO' 2,2 0' �2 0 37)0' S7�L70' I 22.�OQ' �22.�OQ' 31 2' 31. 2' ,Q2.0' �2 0' i 37 -34�OO i- ,Q'i 22 Q' 22 4 36 0 5�4 I ` �1 L67-i '-= IN AND CONSENTTO I CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE P.O.C. -- ^_—• --•• - � •• S 6 0.00') - •• ••�•• •• - •n—• •• - 1 O.B. I INTO STREETS,PARKS OR OTHER PUBLIC USED AND DEDICATED TO THE USE I z I3TM AVE$.t NEW 6,---�--�' s---�_-__L------ - - ---- s-� -_.�_-- L`-` ---`1---��-s-' _--- - ______ �-� -S .._ I I C•7 OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER. _ 44 W \,EXISTING 6" o WATER MAIN \ _, „.... �ltl WATER MAIN I T=_-�}- �_ �_-__ " Ir__..i �_� i o \ NEW MANHO E NEW MANHOLE t NEW MANHOLE I NEW 8" ' 60 D �EASEME'� _ _ I F�Y1 STA.6+35 �� EXISTING 10" NEW 8" I NE MANHOLE r ; I, NEW MAf(HOLE R�-- v XXXXX XXXXXXXXX'S BANK OF BOZEMAN ' SEWER MAIN INV=98.81' I SEWER IN SEWER MAIN STA 6+35 I �t FOR BABCOCK T. _ �, I (R-i3 ZONING) INV. 97.88' I >. I I I MH 3 STATE 0 MONTANA i I I t I T' - EX - , COUNTY OF GALLATIN 1-- -E t. ,,._.,»...; r _ ^-; r.._..._, _'""": I / 7•----'B r_-_-.T r-----t II""''T STA.6+90'-'T 1 "EXISTING 8" . ' ° i - i h i ( ° ' INV=97.96' ;SEWER MAIN ,........«- __,_—..____" r i 1 EXIST.MH-BO-� r R.LEE NOOORI &AlE%ISg RLOVA •.-...•.-». ••••• I L ✓1 1 T , t i 521 w.BRANT mm , ° i ""-"""'"""-_'"" ON THIS DAY OF IN THE YEAR BEFORE f I S F).7+95 I , BOZEIAAN,NT ts9]I3 1 i1 I I I „ ••�-° INV.99.26'� XIST.130'-D"` : ,I30, - ME PERSONNAY APPEARED .) �.E %IST. 0" KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE OF THE BANK THAT 'I EASEMENT ` i ± i EASE ENT a I i e EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT.AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH BANK EXECUTED THE SAME. ff i ' i i IN WHEREOF, HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY , � i x3 j � OFFICIAL SEAL THE Y AND YEAR IN THIS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE I 1 I - A s ' I t t I � WRITTEN. , 1 r r L____J -_..__J t__-.J l___..J �_ ....�J L____.I t L) - 'I j NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA t I 1 I .... _... ... i RESIDING AT_ 11 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES , ENLARGED VICINITY MAP CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR ) II SCHOOL 13016CT NO 7 , 1,THE UNDERSIGNED,RON ALLEN,PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYER, 8E3POR H,�SCHOOL DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT BETWEEN 19_, �' AND- 19_,1 SURVEYED THIS AMENDED SUBDIVISION WEST MAIN ST.(US 191) AND PLATTED SAME AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND AS wLr� DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE MONTANA E v Y NORTH SCAL E.I' 30'-0" SUBDIVISION AND AND PLATTING ACT, SECTIONS 76-3-101 THROUGH 76-3-614. M.C.A.,AND THE BOZEMAN AREA SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. •FOUND REBAR WITH CAP AS NOTED. DATED THIS_DAY OF A.D.,19_. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR o SET 5/8"x 18"REBAR WITH CAP. - MONTANA REGISTRATION NO.— DEVELOPER /OWNER CLERK AND RECORDER 4 `-T I - CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR DONALD BOCKHAHN DATE: NOVEMBER 5,1996 - 1,SHELLEY CHENEY,CLERK AND RECORDER OF GALLATIN CUNTY,MONTANA, --- - f BOZEMAN,MT 59715 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WA'i FILED 1,ANDY EPPLE,PLANNING DIRECTOR,OF THE CITY-COUNTY PLANNING 0 IN MY OFFICE AT O,CLOCK,(A.M. OR P.M.), THIS,_ AY OF BOARD HAVE RENEWED THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND FIND THAT .f "-' TOTAL GROSS AREA: 83,124 S.F. A.D.199-,AND RECORDED IN BOOK--,__,OF PLATS IT CONFORMES TO THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS CA CHEQU<.'r- VALLEY OF PLACE. L- V1LLAC 5 P.UD. NET AREA: 67,824 S.F. - ON PAGE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER,GALLATIN COUNTY, 76-3-101 THROUGH 76-3-614. M.C.A.,AND THE BOZEMAN AREA a R- p I h MONTANA. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. - - -_"- CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS DOCUMENT NUMBERS DATED THIS—DAY OF A.D.19 0 I,PHILIP FORBES THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE,CITY OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA, CLERK AND RECORDER PLANNING DIRECTOR AT THE"PLAT OF CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES" CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT E NOIE: TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA,IS WITHIN THE Cltt ALL AREAS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND OUTSIDE THE INDIVIDUAL OF BOZEMAN MASTER PLAN AREA AND CAN BE PROVIDED WITH MUNICIPAL -' - _-- LOT BOUNDARIES WILL BE COMMON SPACE OWNED EQUALLY BY FACILITIES FOR THE SUPPLY OF WATER AND DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE AND - CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE SOLID WASTE. THEREFORE UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 76-4-1241), -- + i- _ - THE NINETEEN LOTS. { CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER - -.: _1 _ N THIS TRACT IS NOT SUBJECT TO SANITARY RESTRICTION CLEARANCE, •- - .1 L -1 €j:1 ( w - - I, PHILIP FORBES THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE, - • CERTIFICATE OF INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS I,STAN HUGHES,TREASURER OF GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA, OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA,DO HEREBY CERTIFY i 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS TEEN THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS BEEN DULY EXAMINED DATED THIS_DAY OF A.D.,19_. 4� 'I DULY EXAMINED AND THAT NO REAL PROPERTY TAXES AS°iSSEO AND HAVE THE SAME TO CONFORM TO THE LAW,COR:OFAN I I,THE UNDERSIGNED, -DO HEREBY CERTIFY - APPROVE IT, AND HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION TO.THE CITY OF I ��I .I S W AND LEVIED ON THE LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED ARE DELINQLIENT. THAT BETWEEN -1992 AND 1992,THE - BOZEMAN FOR PUBLIC USE OF ANY AND ALL LANDS SHOWN ON YE E'.DE y !„r_ REQUIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS WERE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE _ - THE PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED TO SUCH USE. Y it I— WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PHILLIP J.FORBES - - T -�F-- DRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE DATED THIS__DAY OF __,A.D.,19 N -I IIII DRIED THIS_DAY OF_ -A.D.,19—_. CITY OF BOZEMAN TREASURER OF GALLATIN COUNTY WFS7 K)CH 5T. _._...__. .._.._ ..__... __ ......... - DIRECTOR - -���-----�-- OF PUBLIC SERVICE , 1-97Z LANDSCAPE LEGEND I STORiV9`.11ATEI� RETEPlTlON CALCS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.7 SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE SIZE OTY SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - SURFACE AREA EXG.) AREA (DEV.) COEFFICIENT• s �� - DNA, L_�..—..—..—..—..— . ._........---_-_..—_._. .. .. .. BUILDING 0 17,090 .95 At m ACER PLATANOIDES NORWAY MAPLE 2'GAL.B+B 50 FT. 8 - PAVING 0 15,414 .85 5 WEST MAIN ST. US 191 GRAVEL o o so o t ( GRASS 87,083 54,579 .20 - RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FRAXINUS GREEN ASH 11/2'-2- 50 FT. r_.. —. .. ..T..T.. -.. ..—..—.. .. .. ..—. EXISTING SITE - C=.200 PENNSYLVANICA GAL B+B I I I .I DEVELOPED SITE- C=.462 0 O JUNIPERUS SABINA TAM JUNIPER 18'-24' 3 FT. 150 t I - 3o U1 UTY ESMT. (Ox.95)+(0x.85)+(87,083x.20)_ .200 (17,090x.95)+(15,414x.85)+(54,579x.20)_.462 kk�l TAMARISCIFOLIA 87,083 87,083 0 �— I. PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF- 10 YR.STORM II. DEVELOPED SITE RUNOFF- 70 YR.STORM W❑ PRUNUS X CISTENA PURPLE LEAF PLUM 2'GAL B+B 8 FT. 15 V_ s .._. SITE SLOPE-CE SITE SLOPE A CE TRAVEL DISTANCE^•630 TRAVEL DISTANCE-630' =. (PRE-DEVELOPED SITE) - --- -- - -- -� Tc- 42 MN.(FIG.E 2)P c- 30 MIND(FIG•22)SITE SITE CALCULATIONS I ) + SETBACK AREA= 40,081 S.F. i 9 k i= ,41 IN.PER HR. i=.41 IN�PER HR. -•65 TOTAL AREA=87,083 S.F. AREA %OF TOTAL —1 I I I -PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF IS: J C, Lam. -- TOTAL AREA MINUS SETBACKS + 47,002 S.F. 100% —' --, - _ _ , = .2 TOTAL l =.16 EXISTING RUNOFF - - p= _ --- -- 1 CFS ----- l -DEVELOPED RUNOFF IS: OPEN AREA MINUS SETBACKS ' 29,912 S.F. 64% —1 �—I ! o 0= CIA LANDSCAPE AREA MINUS SETBACKS 14,498 S.F. 31% _ CAI OI I CHEOUAMEGO = .462(.41) (e+T—." ec) =.38 CFS DEVELOPED RUNOFF VALLEY OF I PLACE' I VILLAGE P.U.D. LANDSCAPE AREA WITH SETBACKS 54,579 S.F. 63% ; FLOWER o oI III.REQUIRED RETENTION VOLUME 0.16 CFS RUNOFF(EXISTING) , AREA 15,414 S.F. 33% ---------- PAVED ._ TIME HR Fr nwuwcn _ z 16 BUILDING AREA 17,090 S.F. 36% F ` o p REQUIRED RETENTION VOLUME 0.60 CFS RUNOFF(DEVELOPED) t. I F== N TIME HR /sEc �• wwut n ® e U ., i ; F_ 2 60 38 2728 t2 .. .. � I _. •� . I ' ) ,- SEl4ER ESMT � ('� S_!r R Ei All V '� � z I+ - _.: - �- - --.w- - C:: �E.._ - a o -- - - FTC I COR ORAN'S a — RR �••! � I � —ARRAN MENT�1 — M ARRA MENT`O WE SIDE 1NE sDE REF ADJOINERS ZONING ACDIT17N DITION­ —'E� - NORTH: �1 MARY FRANCESCA PALFFY 8-2 � ~7 WEST KO H ST C/O H.A.BOLINGER(BOX 1047) .......... ... ...._......____--._ ,_ .__......_ ......._.....-.. ....._....._. _.---_.._. _..._......._...._ BOZEMAN,MT.59715 f I WEST: �2 CAROL J.GRAYBILL R-3 x 1325 W.BABCOCK �+ a BOZEMAN,ML 59715 _j _-TO MHf{79 132'-O" FROM PROP.LINE TO MIA 198'-0--- - `I PEDESTRIAN TRAIL- II RIM EL.= 798.015 FROM PROP.LINE o o AND BIKE PATH RIM EL.=4805.64 ❑3 LUTHER&NELUE K.REEL R-3 N /z� •,�' I 'i ' FL.EL.=4798.01 m I I STORMWATER RET. "� ' FL.EL.=4796.20 1336 W.BABCOCK I / , I EXIST.10"SS MAIN N(659.45� I AREA(2728 CU.FT.) BOZEMAN, T.59715 , ro .. ..__ _ ..T. .. .. _ %.. .. .. {� M 78.27' 4E 3.00' 22.00' 22.00f' 2E.00' 22.00' 37.0'.. .00' 22.00' 22.00' 31.62' 31.62' 22.00 22.00' 37.0'• .Do'•• 22.00' 22.00 22.00 36.00'•• 5 •4' Ul I R-3 k .I —c ° E__------- - --- - - - - -- -- -- - ---- -- BOZEMAN, T 59715 r __ E i1 r= — —. e c c 1320 W.BABCOCK AN M 8'-0"SETBACK_ �,•, ,!' I I / �l � � I � I I �"" � HERITAGE CONDO ASSOCIATION R-3 .4 / 3 � C/0 JOHN S.FRENCH JR.(218 PIONEER DRIVE) BOZEMAN.MT.59715 F Bit, aY \ f,•. \ I I i 00 g o g I o IN EAST: © KATHRYN H.CONSER R-3 € 1216 W.BABCOCK i \` BOZEMAN,ML 59715 in f 7 R.LEE WOODRIFF&ALEXIS PARLOVA R-3 521 W.GRANT SL , - -- - -- -- - BOZEMAN,MT.59715 f SOUTH: 8 RALPH AND MARION W.CHALLENDER R-3 `\ • I 222 S.13TH EXISTING F.H. 78.27\ 36 ¢'�`,. �,2H12PO' �2 2 0' 3 I I. 22 12 Q' 31� 2' 3L 2' a2 12PO' 3 I' I. 22 2 Q' 22 3�. 0' "5 4' I BOZEMAN.MT.59715 + D , ,It 'n g ❑9 MIKE STEINER R-3 ..-- .._. 304 S 13TH , ' r, J w w 8 O:DO' w, _ _I I BOZEMAN,ML 59715 tt ,1� I ^j 'TH A $. SOUTHWEST: 1 O JAMES E.AND MARLENE SHORT R-3 NEW 6"WATER MAIN INSTALL ' SS MH -_-- - _ NEW 8"SS MAIN _ SS MH _I CURB&GUTTER INSTALL SS MH n I CONNECT TO BOZEMAN, M N,M } INSTALL SS MH - - INSTALL I /q/ �, INSTALL SS MH ` BOZEM 7 .-----------.I-- — -----I-- ------..-.____ - - -I- ----._ ....----...-. _. ..__......._-----� '�I "'.._- EXIST.8"WATER AN MT 59 15 r OFIBOZEMAN }_r__� JARVIS AND SUEANNE BROWN R-3 ' 305 S.13TH CONNECT TO EXIST. , TO MHg80 136'-0" MH 3-370'-0" i i BOZEMAN,ML 59715 6"WATER MAIN- FROM PROP.LINE FROM MH$2 j CITY OF BOZEMAN I I I I RIM EL.=480B.84 I ( RIM EL=4807.43 I I I 12 JANET D.BERTINO R-3 i FL.EL.=4799.19 , FL.EL.=4797,56 , 309 S.13TH 1 BOZEMAN.MT.59715 I( I i I 30'-0"SS EASE. I 30'-0"SS EASE. I 13 JAMES F.&ALICE T.SARGENT R-3 I BOZEMAN,MT.59715 -- -..-.✓ i VIA D.MCCORMICK R-3 ...---'"' BOZEMAN, i.59715 , ' 14 J.ROGER&Sri I I 306 S.14TH V AN M _ 15 EARL J. &JANICE M.PEACE R-3 310 S. 14TH (� 4•ti✓I(-1 r. BOZEMAN,MT.59715 OVERALL SFTE PLAN P^Vi A 1 1"=30._o.. _ y IC• P nl 0 i I: D, r------- i -f- I I -- I I I .j 30' SEWER �""� EASEMENT L..__________J I I I PEDESTRIAN TRAIL � E N(659.45) 78.2T 36.00 22.00' 22.00' 22.W' 22.00' 37.0 _' 00' 22.00' 22.00' 31.62' 31.62' 22.00' 22.00' 37.0' 00' 22,00' 22,00' 22.00' 36.00' 5.94' N 11J1 Q I. — — -- — -- — — — — — — — — - - — O C) 0 [y/^���, I S O O O O O O O I I O z I N� O O O N .H' C� O O O 9 N d N� N� N� � N l � I i 76.27' 36. 0' 22.0 2.00' 22.0 2.00' 3.0' 22.0 2.00' 31. 2' 31 2' 22.0 2.00' 3.0' .00 22.00' 22.00' 22.00' 36.00' 51.44' y�,g i 1 P., ' � l i l o F� rT} m I 6'-6'W1DE I ! ! t 0 BOULE\rARD --' j U r .-• ! 6'WIDE SIDEWALK 0 I I I -_....__7 - r \ --- ..._.-F --------- -------- --- --------._._._ _E.....-_.- _�.....� I ! U4, C MPLETE In ITS i EI`I IRETY IN PHASE 9 f'O TEMPORARY CURB A D W F N--r _; 'I..,...-_� r-- I I I Iu� 24'DR1YE WITH PHAS�i t____J �1 Q � r-'�1 I �wl� m0'� 1 i i 11 I I 0 1 N I It _1 L-_._.! L__J J E PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE I r I 0 t it ItN 5 �o L ----- -- I ! ! 1 I I i I ! 1 I 30'SEWER L EASEMENT -----------I I I I 8.27' PE DO S—TR oIA N- —TRAIL 7 360 a 22.00' 2 3 162 Oo, -3 16 - 2-2.0-0'ON- 22.00'- — t 0 0' — — O — --- —2.00—'C —3-600' 5(II."9J4IIIII'' — — - - - - - - - - - - Oo,ovSnZm I�Ii'� ����/�'' .J, Q0 22.00' r o o r o o N 2 L - - - 3 0' ' O 78,27' 22.0 2.00 22.0 2.00 3 22.0 2.OD 31. 1312' 22.0 .00 3.0 22.0 2.00 22.0 36.00 �.r-. pa 1 1 I i I i a B'WIDE -6'WIDE C z Pm 13TM AVE& O SIDEWALK, I BOULEVARD STANDARD STORM U m DRAIN INLET p I I I I H • r-� I f_ _'I C _� I li-•-I W �---� I--•-� 1 r- I..._._-_—___.____, i i I I i 9 I E I 1 I K I k I i I I 1 I 1 m l 3 I i I I 1 1 i i I I I I I_-_J I ._.9 i_.__1 E____ I LWJ INLET CASTING NEENAH'R-3067 OR 9FCO'515-7 PROPOSED FINAL OVERALL S17E PLAN - PHASE 11 ASTM C-76 CLASS 2 _ . Ww xa-a 4ao' BLOCK-OUT FOR. p OUTLET PIPE m 6010'R.O.W. r 6' 5'-O' S-6' 38'-O'B.O.C.TO B.O.C. - r I r CITY OF BOZEMAN 1.5'MINUS ASPHALT APPLIED STD.INTEGRAL CONC. ROAD BASE �L IN T LIFTS / CURB AND GUTTER 2Y_y 14 MAX TYP 14 MAX TYP zv. 2%---- - -- rr �K'f .iMr`e✓I dU83'a'.h 1 6'PRECAST BASE � 6'MINUS PIT 43.O.D. I o PUN LBBASE 7•-r� 4 STREET PROFILE (13 I H AVE. SOUTH) STQ. STORM DRAIN INLET BO EMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING Or'FICE cirY_c,��;r;; ; ►�,,,,,a CARNEGIE BUILDING - 35 NORTH BOZEMAN P. 0. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 (406) 582-2360 (FAX #582-2363) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions. The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Zone Code. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Name and address of property owner: Don Bockhaln; 1500 Mountain Goat Trail; Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 586-2400 2 . Name and address of applicant: Springer Group Architects, P.C.; 201 South Wallace; Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 585-2400 3. Name and address of Engineer/BrshitpgVPlanner: Lowell W. Springer; 201 South Wallace: Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 585-2400 4. Name of project/development: Carson Place 5. Address of proposed development: 1304 W. Babcock; Bozeman, MT 59715 6. Legal description: Ems. SWti of Section 12, T2S, R5E, M.P.M. 7. Current Zoning R-3 Land Area 83,124 sq.ft. 1_91 acres B. Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary:_ A 19_unit townhouse complex with one townhouse bailding of six units which exceeds the maximum units per cluster of five allowed by the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 9. Review Fee: $660.00 (Minimum fee after refund: $400.00) �0 This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and 6& copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36". Application deadline varies. Please check with the Planning Office for date. This application must be signed by both the applicant and property owner (if different) before the submittal will be accepted. 0 I (We)/h•Freby brtify that the above information is true and corre, t tp the b st of my (our) knowledge. ;'Applicant's 7tu7 Pr perty Owner's &Signae mAITTAN 406.294-3255 - Fwc 406-284-3278 BANK P.O. BOX 690 • MANHATTAN,MONTANA 59741 www.m3nhattanbank.com TODAY'S DATE: TO FAX TO COMPANY.:, ATTENTION:H1Z- 'Qulp ,Slt�L7a.p� FROM: MA.NHATTAN STATE BANK XA1M:-Lu& domv Sow NMOER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER S' 'E: Please call us at 406-284-3255 if there is a problem with this transmission. P00/100 'd 912E P22 90P(XHd) NN89 31H1S N811HHNHW 51 : 11 (03P1)P002-90-130 BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE Ooc�m■e 35 NORTH SOZEMAN AVENUE city-county P.O.BOX 640,BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771.0640 Dt■nntnQ OHleq PHONE:(406)582.2360 PAX: (406)302.2363 August 20, 1997 Lowell S per«. Spxinger Croup Architects 201 Soutb Wallace Avenue BoZernan.MY.S9715 RE: Canon Placc Towabouscs• Denr Lowcll: i This is to inform you that the Boz==City-County Planning Office bas eousidered your request of August 2. 1997,reEarding the stag of the Centro LTD prope q lxatcd at 1232-36 West Babcock$meet in xelatioa to the proposed Carson Place Townbouse development,and as a result offer the following ca mments for your considctation. The adjoining cast Fuperty rcfctrcdto in your correspoadencc AS the Parlova/Woodriff property is evr=ly zoocd'R-a",Rmidcatial High Density District. One-Eujy taobile homes Oil permanent foundations and on individual lots are iistod as a principal pmMittxduse in the R-4 District. However.the mdstimg z=mk1'acn:rcd homes located on said property are comidaed by the Pl=ning Office as a non.conforming use,since they axe not on individual lots. Manufactured borac"pafla"a=vm a listed pexaaitted uac in the R-4 district, S 71c issue of 4 non-c0ttf0zmi0&land use for the odsting manufactured mobile home park is clot effected asthis time by the proposed Carson Place Townhouse dcvclapmmt. Until suchtimr that fiuther deve2opmcat is proposed on the Farlovw Woodrif'pr+opetty or as specified under Section 18.50.160 of tote Zoniag Ordinance(sec attached copy) the right to operate and rnaincain a aoneotsfatming use tray zerauiu. If your have nay further questions,don't hesitate to contact ate at*e Planning Offiec. P,evectfauy. (93? David P dtoa Senior saner L,t70 Ds►dPs o u Zu AC. Andy Ep&-,P12=Lag Director E L P y <�N f V I Z D-T PLina{ngood:eN P.971on► ��y O� Ala1,Tµ� L,p' 0? V001200 'd 922E V82 90U(Xd3) NN88 3181S N811UHNUW 91 : 1l (03M)U002-90-130 OCT. 06 04 10:54;o Bishop r`Ippraisa1 -+Os SSG OOSS p a•o PSI r'IN•.I I ♦I' J t I 1 I •• 1 1 M .1 '.' ,•� ' �•• '1• • p'MUM/N 1{♦1 ' v�l 1 1,1 �. (, b M!![[ 7• 1 I111',•Il, .,,,N•. tJF i (1.ly,d►aN►�� ,✓ I' . M,•r1�1 r, ru•�lu• vp4Atd:lu► , R-0 ,.f 4 ?'� ' • if A .,w, •�1 ,1 « M•,«� »},, , 1'ter . ~ . • .� i~i ,I' I � a ,, � I I 1• I', �„�. » j .. R-4 http://www•bozemaii.net/giswcb/Data/PDF fliles/Zonins Map_,Color,pdf Revised; 091,02/04 VOO/EOO *d 922E V82 90D(Xd3) MG 31d1S Nd11dHNdW 91 : 11 (03m)VO02-90-130 CONMTN[ENT FOR TITLE JNSURANCE File No: 1-77842 Title Officer: Thomas A.Cahill SCIMDULE A 1. Errcctive Date: August 13,2004 at 8:00 A.M. 2. Policy or Politics to be issued: A. ,_,,,ALTA Owner's Policy _Standard Coverage: 10-17-92 Amount: S Premium: $ Proposed Insured: B. XX A.L rA Loan Policy M Standard Coverage: 10-17-92 .Amount: $ 374,000.00 Premium: $ 1,204.50 Proposed Insured: Manhattan State Bank 3. The estate or interest in the land described or rcfcrred to in this Commitment and covered harem is: roe simple 4. Title to the said estate or interest in said land is at the e5ective date hereof vested in: Centro,LTD 5. The land rcrerred to in this Commitment is described as follows: A-tract of.land in the Nl:"'/nSW% ofScetion 12,Township 2 South,Range 5 Sast,M.P.M., Gallatin County,Montana,described as follows: Beginning at a point 660 feet East of the Northwest corner of the E%SW'/or Section 12,in Township 2 South,Range 5 East,M.P.M.,at which point of beginning an iron post is set;thence running South,parallel with the West line of said L%SW%, 660 feet;thence East 132 feet;thence North 660 feet to the North line.of said E'/SW%a;thence West, along the North line I32 ree,to the place orbeginning. (Deed Reference: Film 100,page 3068) (AuthorizWSig;nature) sC111WU1.z A AI:I'A Cammitmcnt Underwriter. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Cumpuny VOOIVOO 'd 922E V82 90v(X8J) HNHO 31d1S N8118HNUN 9l : ll (03N)v002-90-1J0 General Contracting, Inc. 1500 Mountain Goat Tr. Bozeman,MT 59715 Established- 1975 (406)586-2185 May 20, 1997 City of Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715 I, Don Bockhahn, have reviewed the conditions set forth by the City of Bozeman Planning Staff and I am in agreement . Don 1 L. ock a 13OZErV1 ,� CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE Bozeman 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE City-County P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-0640 Planning Office PHONE: (406) 582-2360 FAX: (406)582-2363 June 3, 1997 Don Bockhahn 1500 Mountain Goat Road Bozeman, MT. 59715 RE: Carson Place Townhouses Dear Don: This is to formally inform you that on Monday, June 2, 1997, the Bozeman City j Commission voted 5-0 to conditionally approve your applications for preliminary plat review and a zoning planned unit development to develop nineteen townhouse units at 1304-1312 West Babcock Street, with the following attached conditions: Planning Application No. P-9717 Engineering: 1. A legend of all symbols and line types used shall be provided; 2. Storm Water Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan shall include' grading information of sufficient detail that adequate drainage from the site to an approved destination may be verified. The plan shall also include sufficient spot elevations,typical stormwater retention basin details, basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within park or open space shall be designed and constructed so as to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Site Grading -A detailed Site Grading Plan shall be provided with the subdivision infrastructure improvement plans. The plan shall include existing contours, final contours, spot elevations after street and drainage improvements have been constructed and drainage flow arrows reflecting final developed lot grading. The plan must demonstrate that the final plat grading and final property grading will provide adequate drainage to an 7 Caisof Place<Tokouses->;6: f9 acceptable discharge point without adverse impacts to adjacent properties. Off-site drainage facilities and drainage easements or other rights of occupancy shall be provided where necessary for conveyance of drainage off site; 3. Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer facilities and the public street,prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer(PE)registered in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted; 4. All infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb & gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space,rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages and storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be installed and initially accepted by the City of Bozeman, or financially guaranteed(see Section 16.42.030 BMC),prior to filing of the final plat. The financial guarantee(s) shall be as stipulated in an improvements agreement between the owner and the City. Said agreement must be signed prior to filing the final plat. No building permits shall be issued prior to completion and City acceptance of the water and sewer infrastructure improvements; 5. The Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e. 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) obtained prior to FSP approval; 6. Applicant shall provide and file with the County- Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of SID's for the following: a. Street improvements to Babcock Street including paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage facilities. b. Street improvements to South 13th Avenue including paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage facilities; 7. The full extent of the improvements proposed for each phase of the development shall be clearly indicated on the preliminary plat. The water main shall be fully looped with phase I. Adequate storm drainage facilities must be pro-6ded for each phase; 8. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on the east side of th-.public street frontage of the subject property with Phase I. City Standard concrete curb & gutter shall Can-`6':ace;:'To yr bo ses` 6 tl 1 be installed as part of Phase I on the west side of South 13th Avenue in the area where it will be full width and rolled asphalt curbs on the east side of South 13th Avenue. The drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach i.e. concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb; 9. The following dedications and/or easements shall be granted to the City of Bozeman: a. Prior to filing of the final plat; A utility and public street easement for the east 48 feet of'South 13th Avenue. b. With the filing of the final plat; 1) Dedication of the 12 feet of South 13th Avenue located on the subject property. 2) Dedication of the 30 of West Babcock Street adjacent to and north of the subject property; It shall be made clear that no open space is to be located in any public Right of Way. 10. The phased construction of South 13th Avenue must be completely and adequately defined prior to initiation of any construction. South 13th Avenue shall be paved throughout with Phase I. With Phase I, the south = 400 feet shall be constructed to a City Standard 37 feet width, back of curb to back of curb and the north = 240 feet shall be 24 feet wide. In the area where the street is less than standard width, suitable temporary curbing shall be provided on the east side of South 13th. Provisions for responsibility for maintenance of said temporary curb shall be the developers. Also in the area where South 13th is less than standard width, City Standard "No Parking" signs shall be placed on both sides of the street. The number and format of the signs shall be coordinated with the City Sign Department. Prior to construction of Phase II, the north 240 feet of South 13th shall be completely reconstructed to a width of 37 feet, back of curb to back of curb. The north most = 195 feet of curb on the west side of South 13th shall be realigned to City Standard location, 11 Meet off property line, with phase II. South 13th Avenue on the subject property shall be aligned with South 13th Avenue immediately to the south. Water and sewer infrastructure shall be in the standard City locations; 11. Typical curb details, typical asphalt paying section detail and right and left curb line profiles for all phases shall be provided to and approved by the City Enginee_; Superintendent of Street/Sanitation: 12. Until South 13th Avenue is built to a full City standard street all the way to West Babcock Street the City Street Department will not be providing snow plowing services; 13. The applicant shall address storm drainage for Phase I at the comer of South 13th Avenue and West Babcock Street. A plan for the storm drainage system including intakes and piping shall CasoFlace<To s':=6rf97 J _.. ... zs... . . ...................................................................... i 4b be approved by the City Engineer's Office prior to final site plan approval; 14. All asphalt sections for Phase I & II shall be approved by the City Engineer's Office prior to final site plan approval; . . Superintendent of Water/Sewer: 15. The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and easements shall be clearly depicted, as well as nearby fire hydrants and proposed fir-.hydrants. The existing main location as drawn on South 13th does not appear to be correct; 16. Sewer and water services as shown are not acceptable. Location of stubs will be reviewed during plan review; 17. Water main will require full loop from Babcock to existing main in South 13th with Phase I; 18. No structures will be permitted in the sewer easement; 19. All weather roadway and access easements will be required to all manholes; 20. Project infrastructure phasing, including all utility and street planting, shall be clearly defined. Water main and services will not be permitted to be installed in phases; Planning Office: 21. That the protective covenants for the home owner's association be amended to address issues pertaining to assessment and maintenance of common open space, landscape areas, streetscape, snow removal, sidewalks, retention ponds. outside storage areas, fences, etc., for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Plat approval; 22. That the applicant consider the design of a stormwater drainage runoff plan that establishes multiple retention ponds in the common open space areas, in-lieu of one large. retention pond along West Babcock Street, and that all retention ponds will not have a side slope to exceed 1:4 with a maximum depth of not more than one (1) in depth, and that it be noted accordingly on a site drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer's Office prior to Final Plat approval; 23. That all references to "Carson Place Townhouse Subdivision" must include reference to the development being a "planned unit development": 24. That the Final Plat shall comply with Section 16.10.030 of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations, and shall include all appropriate documents, certificates, and be accompanied by all appropriate documents, including a Platting Certificate. Two mylar and two clothback copies of C'arson;Flace`:To yr l o ses'` ''61 .9.7 4 the Final Plat must be submitted for Final Plat approval, along with a digital copy of the Final Plat, on a double sided,high density 3 1/2" floppy disk; 25. That the developer shall have three(3)years from the date of Preliminary Plat approval to complete the conditions of preliminary plat approval and apply for Final Plat approval for Phase I and Phase II; and 26. That the applicant submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval of Carson Place Townhouses a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of Preliminary Plat approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Zoning Application No. Z-9726 1. That the applicant provide additional landscape in the common open space areas that contains a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; 2. That the boulevard streetscape be continued to the south boundary of said property and that the applicant ensure that the location of the sanitary sewer and water service lines will not conflict with the formal arrangement of boulevard trees along South 13th Avenue, and that the site plan be revised accordingly prior to Final Site Plan approval; 3. That the applicant provide a screening device along adjacent residential properties that is consistent and/or compatible with existing fencing constructed by adjacent properties and that a typical screening detail be provided prior to Final Site Plan approval; 4. That the applicant provide a typical detail on the site plan verifying the construction of a patio area at the rear of each townhouse unit that also includes the screening device proposed between each unit, if any, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 5. That the applicant construct covered entryways on each of the townhouse units facing onto South 13th Avenue using two different entrywayelevations, and that a typical detail be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 6. That yardlights be installed along the street frontage of South 13th Avenue and that a typical detail and location of the fixtures be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 7. That the applicant provide a typical color palette for the townhouse development that is also verified on the exterior building elevations, which discourages the use of bright, obtrusive colors, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 8. That the applicant relocate the common open space area located at the south end of the subject property to north of the six-unit townhouse structure such that it is located adjacent to the PLaceTo Carson nli'otses':-6;.;f91 5 % % thirty (30) foot wide utility easement, that a minimum fifteen(15) foot side yard setback be established between the six-plex structure and the south property line, and that it be noted accordingly on the landscape site plan prior to Final Site Plan approval; 9. That the applicant confirm on the landscape site plan that the location of water and sanitary sewer service stubs will not conflict with the location of the boulevard streetscape trees along South 13th Avenue, and that it be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; 10. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit within one(1)year of receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness and Major Site Plan Review approval, and prior to proceeding with construction of the project; 11. A boulevard planting detail shall be provided and must comply with the Engineering Department standards. Root barrier material should be used. No plantings shall be allowed in the typical sidewalk location; 12. That the applicant submit to the Planning Office documentation of an agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east to relocate the garbage refuse area and mailboxes for the mobile home park to another location on said property, or that the applicant provide another alternative to relocate said structures outside of the public street and utility easement for the extension of South 13th Avenue to West Babcock Street, prior to Final Site Plan approval; 13 That eight (8) conies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the Bozeman City-County Planning Board shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within sir (6) months of the date of Planning Board approval. A copy of the approved Final Site Plan shall be forwarded to the Building, Street/Sanitation, Water/Sewer, Engineering, and Fire Departments by the Planning Office; and one copy shall be retained in the Planning Office file; 14 That the applicant shall enter into an Improvements Aa eement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement; 15 That a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED; 16 If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve(12)months; Q.is&Place`I owr l souses 6 i�97 6 however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security; and 17 That the applicant upon submitting the Final Site Plan for approval by the Planting Director and prior to issuance of a building permit shall submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval have been satisfied. Should you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval don't hesitate to contact me at the Planning Office. Waivers of right to protest creation of S.I.D.'s for West Babcock Street and South 13th Avenue will be mailed to you for your review. The waivers must be filed at the Clerk&Recorder's Office prior to Final Plat approval(Condition#6) This also applies to the utility and public street easement for South 13th Avenue (Condition#9). Revised documents of the homeowner's by-laws and protective covenants should be submitted to the Planning Office as soon as possible for review to ensure that the amendments outlined in the staff report have been incorporated into the covenants (Condition#21). When submitting the application for Final Plat review and approval you should first review the submittal checklist attached to the application to ensure that it is complete. Incomplete submittals will be returned along with the review fee. In addition to those items specifically discussed above, particular attention should be give Condition#22, #24 and#26. With regard to the zoning application, it would be appropriate to submit a revised landscape plan, which also includes the methods of screening, type and location of yardlights, and 4 relocation of common open space area. The exterior elevations must be revised to address Condition#5 and the color palete noted accordingly on the elevations. Make sure to locate on the landscape plan the service stubs in relation to the boulevard streetscape along South 13th Avenue to ensure that service stubs will not eliminate anv trees (Condition#9). A regular spacing of boulevard trees at one (1)tree per fifty (50) feet of street frontage must be maintained. When submitting the application for Final Plat re%iew and Final P.U.D. Plan Review, please make sure to provide a written narrative Nvith each application explaining how each of the conditions of approval have been met or satisfied. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval or above comments, don't hesitate to contact me at the Planning Office. Good luck on your project! Respectfully, David P.. Skelton Senior lanner DS/dps cc: Springer Group Architect G:a so Place'Fo yr houses:` br.t�. 1 7. A building permit shall be obtained prior to construction of structures and must be obtained within one (1 ) year of final plat approval; 8. Within sixty (60) days of final completion of all site work, the applicant's licensed architect or engineer overseeing the project shall certify to the City- County Planning Office that all improvements have been completed in accordance with the approved final site plan and final plat; 9. If occupancy of any one condominium structure is to occur prior to installation of all on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security; 10. That the applicant provide a written narrative stating that the proposed subdivision will not interfere with any agricultural water user facility and that no irrigation ditches for downstream water rights currently exist on said property, for review by the Planning Office prior to final plat approval; and 11 . Prior'to occupancy of the first duplex condominium structure the applicant shall have satisfied the above conditions, and will have applied for and received final plat approval by the Planning Director. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Carson Place Townhouses - Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn - planned unit development to allow development of subdivision of 1 .91-acre tract for 19-unit townhouse complex and allow one of four townhouse structures to contain six dwelling units (1304 West Babcock Street) (P-9716 and Z-9726) This was the time and place set for review of preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Carson Place Townhouses, as requested by Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn, under Application No. P-9716 and Z-9726. Under the preliminary plat application, a 1 .91-acre tract located in the East one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, is to be subdivided into 19 townhouse residential lots. Under the conditional use permit for planned unit development, the applicant is proposing the development of 19 townhouse units in four buildings, with one of the buildings to contain six dwelling units, thus exceeding the maximum density of five allowed per townhouse structure by one. The subject property is more commonly located at 1304-1312 West Babcock Street. Senior Planner Dave Skelton presented the staff report. He stated that the City-County Planning Board conducted its public hearings on the preliminary plat and the conditional use 06-02-97 - 5 - • permit at its May 20 meeting. Following the public hearings and review of the criteria for both preliminary plats and conditional use permits and the comprehensive staff findings, which are contained in the written staff report previously distributed to the Commission, the Planning Board concurred in staff's recommendation for approval of the project. The Senior Planner noted that, over the past five years, staff has worked with the applicant to develop a plan that is better than the plan he originally submitted. He stated that under this application, nineteen townhouse units are to be created, in four buildings containing four to six dwelling units each. He noted that this development is to be completed in two phases. In conjunction with this development, the applicant has proposed the extension of South 13th Avenue southward from its current terminus to West Babcock Street. Since only 12 feet of the right-of-way width is located on the subject property, the applicant is being required to obtain a public street and utility easement from the adjacent property owners for the remaining 48 feet of street width required. He stated that, while the full 37-foot-wide I I paved street width and curb, gutter and sidewalk will be required along the west side of the street, a rolled asphalt curb will be installed on the east side of the street until that property is developed. Senior Planner Skelton stated that the applicant supplied a community impact statement and an environmental impact statement with his application, and staff has reviewed those documents and commented on the information provided. He then indicated that staff reviewed this application in light of the six criteria established by the Montana Legislature for review of subdivisions and in light of the six criteria for review of conditional use permits and the criteria for review of planned unit developments as contained in the zone code. The Senior Planner stated that during review of this application, it was recognized that the extension of South 13th Avenue to West Babcock Street will enhance the transportation network system. He concluded by reiterating that the Planning Board has forwarded a recommendation for approval of this project. Mr. Lowell Springer, architect representing the applicant, indicated a willingness to respond to questions. Mr. Jarvis Brown, 305 South 13th Avenue, stated his house is the second home south of the subject property. Fie asked about how South 13th Avenue is to be extended southward 06-02-97 • - 6 - • to West Babcock Street in .phases in conjunction with the development and asked how this development might impact on-street parking. Senior Planner Skelton reviewed the phasing of the street improvements as this subject property develops. He then stated that the plans meet the off-street parking requirements contained in the zone code. He stressed that, since South 13th Avenue is a public street, on- street parking will be allowed. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the preliminary plat, as requested by Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn, under Application No. P- 9716, to allow the subdivision of a 1 .91-acre tract located in the East one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, into 19 townhouse residential lots, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1 . A legend of all symbols and line types used shall be provided; 2. Storm Water Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan shall include grading information of sufficient detail that adequate drainage from the site to an approved destination may be verified. The plan shall also include sufficient spot elevations, typical stormwater retention basin details, basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within park or open space shall be designed and constructed so as to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Site Grading - A detailed Site Grading Plan shall be provided with the subdivision infrastructure improvement plans. The plan shall include existing contours, final contours, spot elevations after street and drainage improvements have been constructed and drainage flow arrows reflecting final developed lot grading. The plan must demonstrate that the final plat grading and final property grading will provide adequate drainage to an acceptable discharge point without adverse impacts to adjacent properties. Off-site drainage facilities and drainage easements or other rights of occupancy shall be provided where necessary for conveyance of drainage off site; 3. Plans and specifications for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer facilities and the public street, prepared and signed by a professional engineer (PE) registered in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering. services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted; 06-02-97 • - 7 - • 4. All infrastructure improvements including 1 ) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb and gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages and storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be installed and initially accepted by the City of Bozeman, or financially guaranteed (see Section 16.42.030, Bozeman Municipal Code), prior to filing of the final plat. The financial guarantee(s) shall be as stipulated in an improvements agreement between the owner and the City. Said agreement must be signed prior to filing the final plat. No building permits shall be issued prior to completion and City acceptance of the water and sewer infrastructure improvements; 5. The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, and Army Corps of Engineers shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e. 310, 404, Turbidity Exemption, etc.) obtained prior to final site plan approval; 6. Applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed waivers of right to protest creation of SIDs for the following: a. Street improvements to West Babcock Street including paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage facilities. b. Street improvements to South 13th Avenue including paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage facilities; 7. The full extent of the improvements proposed for each phase of the development shall be clearly indicated on the preliminary plat. The water main shall be fully looped with Phase I. Adequate storm drainage facilities must be provided for each phase; 8. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on the east side of the public street frontage of the subject property with Phase I. City standard concrete curb and gutter shall be installed as part of Phase I on the west side of South 13th Avenue in the area where it will be full width and rolled asphalt curbs on the east side of South 13th Avenue. The drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach i.e. concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb; 9. The following dedications and/or easements shall be granted to the City of Bozeman: a. Prior to filing of the final plat; A utility and public street easement for the east 48 feet of South 13th Avenue. b. With the filing of the final plat; 1 ) Dedication of the 12 feet of South 13th Avenue located on the subject property. 2) Dedication of the 30 feet of West Babcock Street adjacent to and north of the subject property; It shall be made clear that no open space is to be located in any public Right of Way. 10. The phased construction of South 13th Avenue must be completely and adequately defined prior to initiation of any construction. South 13th Avenue shall be paved throughout with Phase I. With Phase I, -he south 400 feet shall be constructed to a City Standard 37 feet width, back of curb to back of curb and the north � 240 feet shall be 24 feet wide. In the area where the street is less than standard width, suitable temporary curbing shall be provided on the east side of South 13th. Provisions for responsibility 'for maintenance of said temporary curb shall be the 06-02-97 • - 8 - • developers. Also in the area where South 13th is less than standard width, City Standard "No Parking" signs shall be placed on both sides of the street. The number and format of the signs shall be coordinated with the City Sign Department. Prior to construction of Phase ll, the north 240 feet of South 13th shall be completely reconstructed to a width of 37 feet, back of curb to back of curb. The north most ::= 195 feet of curb on the west side of South 13th shall be realigned to City standard location, 11 %2 feet off property line, with Phase II. South 13th Avenue on the subject property shall be aligned with South 13th Avenue immediately to the south. Water and sewer infrastructure shall be in the standard City locations; 1 1 . Typical curb details, typical asphalt paving section detail and right and left curb line profiles for all phases shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer; 12. Until South 13th Avenue is built to a full City standard street all the way to West Babcock Street the City Street Department will not be providing snow plowing services; 13. The applicant shall address storm drainage for Phase I at the corner of South 13th Avenue and West Babcock Street. A plan for the storm drainage system including intakes and piping shall be approved by the City Engineer's Office prior to final site plan approval; 14. All asphalt sections for Phases I and II shall be approved by the City Engineer's Office prior to final site plan approval; 15. The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and easements shall be clearly depicted, as well as nearby fire hydrants and proposed fire hydrants. The existing main location as drawn on South 13th does not appear to be correct; 16. Sewer and water services as shown are not acceptable. Location of stubs will be reviewed during plan review; 17. Water main will require full loop from Babcock to existing main in South 13th with Phase I; 18. No structures will be permitted in the sewer easement; 19. All weather roadway and access easements will be required to all manholes; 20. Project infrastructure phasing, including all utility and street planting, shall be clearly de-;ined. Water main and services will not be permitted to be installed in phases; 21 . That the protective covenants for the homeowners' association be amended to address issues pertaining to assessment and maintenance of common open space, landscape areas, streetscape, snow removal, sidewalks, retention ponds, outside storage areas, fences, etc., for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to final plat approval; 22. That the applicant consider the design of a stormwater drainage runoff plan that establishes multiple retention ponds in the common open space areas, in lieu of one large retention pond along West Babcock Street, and that all retention ponds will not have a side slope to exceed 1 :4 with a maximum depth of not more than one (1 ) foot in depth, and that it be noted accordingly on a site drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer's office prior to final plat approval; 06-02-97 23. That all references to "Carson Place Townhouse Subdivision" must include reference to the development being a "planned unit development"; 24. That the final plat shall comply with Section 16.10.030 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, and shall include all appropriate documents, certificates, and be accompanied by all appropriate documents, including a Platting Certificate. Two mylar and two clothback copies of the final plat must be submitted for final plat approval, along with a digital copy of the final plat, on a double sided, high density 3'/2-inch floppy disk; 25. That the developer shall have three (3) years from the date of preliminary plat approval to complete the conditions of preliminary plat approval and apply for final plat approval for Phase I and Phase II; and 26. That the applicant submit with the application for final plat review and approval of Carson Place Townhouses a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval has been satisfactorily addressed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. . It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the conditional use permit for planned unit development, as requested by Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn, under Application No. Z-9726, to allow the development of 19 townhouse units in four buildings, with one of the buildings to contain six dwelling units, thus exceeding the maximum density of five allowed per townhouse structure by one, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1 . That the applicant provide additional landscaping in the common open space areas that contain a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to final site plan approval; 2. That the boulevard streetscape be continued to the south boundary of said property and that the applicant ensure that the location of the sanitary sewer and water service lines will not conflict with the formal arrangement of boulevard trees along South 13th Avenue, and that the site plan be revised accordingly prior to final site plan approval; 3. That the applicant provide a screening device along adjacent residential properties that is consistent and/or compatible with existing fencing constructed by adjacent properties and that a typical screening detail be provided prior to final site plan approval; 4. That the applicant provide a typical detail on the site plan verifying the construction of a patio area at the rear of each townhouse unit that also includes the screening device proposed between each unit, if any, for review and approval prior to final site plan approval; 5. That the applicant construct covered entryways on each of the townhouse units facing onto South 13th Avenue using two different entryway elevations, and that a typical detail be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to final site plan approval; 06-02-97 6. That yard lights be installed along the street frontage of South 13th Avenue and that a typical detail and location of the fixtures be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to final site plan approval.; 7. That the applicant provide a typical color palette for the townhouse development that is also verified on the exterior building elevations, which discourages the use of bright, obtrusive colors, for review and approval prior to final site plan approval; 8. That the applicant relocate the common open space area located at the south end of the subject property to north of the six-unit townhouse structure such that it is located adjacent to the thirty (30) foot wide utility easement, that a minimum fifteen (15) foot side yard setback be established between the six-plex structure and the south property line, and that it be noted accordingly on the landscape site plan prior to final site plan approval; 9. That the applicant confirm on the landscape site plan that the location of water and sanitary sewer service stubs will not conflict with the location of the boulevard streetscape trees along South 13th Avenue, and that it be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to final site plan approval; 10. That the applicant obtain a building permit within one (1 ) year of receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness and major site plan review approval, and prior to proceeding with construction of the project; 11 . A boulevard planting detail shall be provided and must comply with the Engineering Department standards. Root barrier material should be used. No plantings shall be allowed in the typical sidewalk location; 12. That the applicant submit to the Planning Office documentation of an agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east to relocate the garbage refuse area and mailboxes for the mobile home park to another location on said property, or that the applicant provide another alternative to relocate said structures outside of the public street and utility easement for the extension of South 13th Avenue to West Babcock Street, prior to final site plan approval; 13. That eight (8) copies of the final site plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the Bozeman City-County Planning Board shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six (6) months of the date of Planning Board approval. A copy of the approved final site plan shall be forwarded to the Building, Street/Sanitation, Water/Sewer, Engineering, and Fire Departments by the Planning Office; and one copy shall be retained in the Planning Office file; 14. That the applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of final site plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement; 15. That a building permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of final site plan approval. Building permits will not be issued until the final site plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the final site plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED; 16. If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be 06-02-97 secured by a method of security equal to one and one-halt times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12) months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security; and 17. That the applicant upon submitting the final site plan for approval by the Planning Director and prior to issuance of a building permit shall submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval have been satisfied. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Staff request for revocation of Kennel License issued to Grace Yost, 705 North Grand Avenue Included in the Commissioners' packets were a letter from Animal Control Officer Connie Lien, dated May 19; a copy of a letter from the Animal Control Officer to Ms. Yost, dated May 27; and a copy of the investigation report on the recent dog bite incident involving one of the dogs at the subject location. Ms. Connie Lien, Animal Control Officer, stated she has worked with Ms. Grace Yost and her kennel since 1980. Over the years, when she has approached Ms. Yost about problems on her site, the applicant has typically been willing to address the issues, typically on a temporary basis, and the complaints from neighbors have continued. She stated that, recently, problems have reached new heights, with one of the dogs biting a woman on May 15. She noted that this same animal also bit another person, and that incident came to light after the recent bite situation. Animal Control Officer Lien stated she is requesting revocation of this kennel license because the problems have not stopped. She noted that a fence has not been erected, the yard is not properly maintained, there are too many dogs on the site, and she questioned whether the household is able to take proper care of the animals. She stated that revocation of the kennel license will mean that no more than two dogs over six months old will be allowed at this site. She cautioned that the Commission may riot select which dogs will be removed from the site; and the dog bite incident is currently pending in City Court. Acting City Manager Brey cautioned that, since the specific incident involving the dog 06-02-97 PELIMJi1MARY TO)J%11�HOUSE SUpEDI V ISION, PLAT CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT ,I Sa I I o +i OF WE,THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS,DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ® � ,(•� ,yam Cl9 /f-1,�'1�1. 111 ��[� B � (� WE, CAUSED A BE SURVEYED,SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED INTO L0T5,BLOCKS, 1 Ir'ti u b/r"`�{C"'ffl;__ krC")VVV('1 JI '`I n !IS:_`=�% STREETS AND ALLEYS, AS SHOWN LL THE PLAT AND CERTIFICATE Of SURVEY (I � C �3 INTO HEREUNTO INCLUDED,THE FOLLOWNG DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND,TO-WTI: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE E 1/2,SW 1/4,OF SECTION 12, T2S, RSE,M.P.M.,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED Q, AS FOLLOWS: ! BEING A TRACT OF LAND BEGINNING AT A POINT 30 FEET SOUTH OF A POINT 660 FEET EAST OF THE FTOF THE E � � F SECTION 12.TO LOCATED IN THE E 1/2, SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, T 2S, RJE, M.P.M. 20RTH SOUTH S RANGENER 5 EAST,M.P.M./ CAT WH H POINT OOF THE SW 14F BEGINNING IS SET ANHIP S� GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 660 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE ) RUNNING REST 132 FEET TO AN.IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING NORTH 660 FEET 1 ,,._..-_.._._____y ,,w.__,__.. ----•' TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE RUNNING EAST 132 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. _._.... 1 j r ,. I THE.ABOVE-DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IS TO BE KNOWN AS"CARBON PLACE { rCRrtAC[coRoo AssoaAnaK ' E 1/2 OF SW 1/4 TOWNHOUSE SUBDIVISION%CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY, AI c/a M.9.mmm A. i NW CORNER OF f MONTANA; AND THE LANDS INCLUDED IN ALL THE STREETS, AVENUES, ,- -d z�W �„___. -, zra row omv _...____.( - _- p1 EXIST:MH-2 Rlau+o[.oWCRT 725,R5E M.P.M. ALLEYS AND PARKS OR PUBLIC SQUARES SHOWN ON SAID PLAT ARE oozEMAv,MT sans , ` , -EXIST.+95 �R-3 ZONING) '-'----••--••", llc m.mT a59n HEREBY GRANTED AND DONATED TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN FOR �`•�a r " STA.3}95 STA.3+20 , B03EMAN,MT 59n5 -_---_—_•----- o INV.96.48' T THE PUBLIC USE AND ENJOYMENT. INV.=98.14' L o z I 'r I NEW 1-1/2" NEW UNDERGROUND DATED THIS_-DAY OF_— A.D. 19___. ,1 Y >. GAS SERVICE " a ELECTRICAL SERVICE ••_�•• / N(659.45') BY } BY MPC - -- 78.2T [L] 38:00' 22.00' 22.00'� 22.00' 22.00' 37.0 AO' 22.00' 22.00' 31.62' '� 31.62' 22.00' 22.00' 37.0 .00'T•-y�22.00' 22.00' 22.00' -•36.00'., 5.•4' SIGNED _ - — ^— SIGNED E ----- - -- --- --- --- - - -- ---- - — -- — -- -- - -- -- ---- 7,A_ o� xxx Q ----- -,..-- -- --- - ---- - -- - - - - C - �w ud Q i o _ z G o m I STATE OF GALLATIN LOT 19 LOT LOT 17 LOT 16 LOT 15 LOT lk l_0T 13 LOT 12 L9711 L(LT�4 lS1L@ L4L$ ° L4LZ Loll L07 5 L91A LQI._S t LOT 2 10T 1 a ( I R w (3 COUNTY OF GALLATIN Fes- j COMMON OPEN(SPACE 4032 S.F., 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 4144 S.F 4144 S.F. •2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 3542 S.F. 3! S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 4144 S.F. 4P44 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 S.F. 2464 SA 4032 S.F. •ool 8766 S.F. (PHASE I) (PHASE Q (PHASE Q(PHASE.,O (PHASE I) (PHAS I (P AE 1) (PHASE 1)(PHASE 1) (PHASE 1) (PHASE-Q-• (PHASE:Q(PHASE I)I (PHAS I) (P ASE_II) - (PHASE II)I(PHASE II)(PHASE II)i (PHASE II) I N= i ,o ON THIS—DAY OF _IN THE YEAR BEFORE ?+� O r " dy I" N (PHASE 1) -. o I o' o I g, o o I $ i -- I o' �y{ 00 0 00; o? o• o t !� '' o o BOCKHAHN, KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE OWNERSME THATTHE BALD o. ...\o I o� o c! o ,opal' o o� THIN 0 0 o N N N o N N N N N a° `k N I^ e? 15-8-1 INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY EXECUTED THE SAME. NI\ vl I f l I I ,•. I I , .I 7 i t 7 1 ',..�• N i ICY z Il n. r- IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MYa / \ yN = OFFlGAL SEAL THE DAY ANAAAFIMONTS CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE WR PUBLIC FOR THE S i RESIDING AT-- TE0ANA W MY COMMISSION EXPIRES I N r EXISTING F.H.- I I I \ O ^ \ 78.2T 36 b' 2 0' 421,01 .. ..� ... ..__.._..... .. Q' 22 Q' 22 �' 36..�00' ? 5 4' R ! I-� -A R1 �2 0' a2 0' �,2 0'` 37 �7 0' 22 Q' �'22 Q' 31� 2' 31. 2' �2,0, ,12 O' 37 I 0° 22 V F�Or o \ 1 00 CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE �. _30 00 J WE,THE UNDERSIGNED MORTGAGEE,DO HEREBY JOIN IN AND CONSENT TO ! � -___ —,—.:--•-- •_�k' •• •• •- .�; "�'• " "—'- •• "-"•-I•• '- —" ',—" '—�' O THE DESCRIBED PLAT,RELEASING OUR RESPECTIVE LEINS,CLAIMS OR ! P.O.C. w \ w' S 6 0.00) _ I w w- ENCUMBRANCES AS TO ANY PORTION OF SAID LANDS NOW BEING PLATTED 0 i a; •-.1, „ ,sp —w �- O.B. INTO STREETS,PARKS OR OTHER PUBLIC USED AND DEDICATED TO THE USE 1--•-T1 1 13 H AVE S., �----�- _'. s-_-�----�------- - - --_ a-� _.�_-_ �_-- - ----�- �'S-- --_- _- '. ------�'..---'�-5-- j_ I p I � OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER. EW 6" - _ �- �.\ / .. .. ...i �_. ° 1 -- - MT� ~' 'EXISTING I o � WATER MAIN _ _ I I r- „ L WATER MAIN o NEW MANHO NEW MANHOLE i n NEW MANHOLE _ 60 0 EASEME T _ C� "� of NEW MANHOLE NEW 8" STA.8+35 EXISTING 10" ) STA 6+35 BCOCK I. XX%XX XXXXXXX%X'S BANK OF BOZEMAN I � v �_r o p NE MANHOLE- ° OR SEWER MAIN INV.=98,81' I SEWER IN SEWER MAIN I (f7-3 ZOI`�II\I'.'i ,' __- 7 ANEW 8" I --- -- --- -- - F BA : E C ---- EXI M -3 - � I `E COUNTY OF GALLATIN ,_-___'e r w._,.,, T., r.__.._.., - _..__i •._. STA.8+90. ., ° / STATE 0 NA F MONTANA J i t i 1 i STA.7+95? I� „I, ' SozEMAM MT s9n5 ' �iSEWER MAIN; ;..,,..........-..,._..i_.' ON THIS_—DAY OF--____IN THE YEAR BEFORE ..L.EXIST.MH-✓(0 R.TEE WOOOR IF k AIE%5 ARLM�A - i I , 531 W.p".T S'RLET P INVa=99.26', XIST.30 0 --'-- --- _____ ---- F XIST.'30-0 ` i E 1 i s i ^ ! _ KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSONNALY APPEARED OF THE BANK THAT ! ' 'I EASEMENT EASEMENT "L"'' I ' /a EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH z BANK EXECUTED THE SAME. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY 6 I CERTIFICATE FIRST ABOVE OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR IN THIS r 0 r , WRITTEN I. -k... . _._.. _. -._.. _- _.._. . .__...-......_..i. .._. .. ._i...... _...... _. ...._ _.. ... -- __.._. ... . _ .. ... .. ...I _.. .-.._H...... ..... ......._.. ...._.__ _. -. .. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _ I NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA ' RESIDING AT ENLARGED VICINITY MAP -, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR I, THE UNDERSIGNED,RON ALLEN, PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYER, SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.7 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT BETWEEN___�__.19—, SENIOR HI0H SCHOOL Q AND ,19—1 SURVEYED THIS AMENDED SUBDIVISION AND PLATTED SAME AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND AS WEST MAIN 5f.(US 191) IILrLJ DESCRIBED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS Of THE MONTANA SUBDIVISION AND AND PLATTING ACT,SECTIONS 76-3-101 THROUGH _ NORTH SCALE;1"=30'-C" 76-3-614, M.C.A.,AND THE BOZEMAN AREA SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. � I i DATED THIS DAY OF ,A.D.,19—. I .._.: .: .. (._. _�"L * ..__.�._1 ®FOUND REBAR WITH CAP AS NOTED. o SET 5/8'z 18"REBAR WTH CAP. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR — MONTANA REGISTRATION NO.--- CLERK AND RECORDER ....-..._._._ _ _..._ _.._.-..___ ____......... _..---_... -. DEVELOPER /OWNER CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR 7 [ --- - DONALD BOCKHAHN DATE: NOVEMBER 5,1996 I,SHELLEY CHENEY.CLERK AND RECORDER OF GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA, -•--' _` --- BOZEMAN,MT 59715 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FILED I, ANDY EPPLE,PLANNING DIRECTOR,OF THE CITY-COUNTY PLANNING IN MY OFFICE AT--O,CLOCK,(A.M.OR P,M.),THIS---DAY OF BOARD HAVE REVIEWED THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT AND FIND THAT -CAt:190N a CHEOU A.D. 199-,AND RECORDED IN BOOK--,OF PLATS IT CONFORMES TO THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS .- TOTAL GROSS AREA: 83,124 S.F. I' ON PAGE--RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER,GALLATIN COUNTY, 76-3-101 THROUGH 76-3-614.M.C.A.,AND THE BOZEMAN AREA VILI.ACE PUD NET AREA: 67,824 S.F. --. VALLEYOP PLACE -t - -- - MONTANA. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. `- CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL OF SANITARY RESTRICTIONS DOCUMENT NUMBERS_ DATED THIS—DAY OF_� A.D.19ig _. - € - 1,. I,PHILIP FORBES THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE,CITY OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA, --- --- - PLANNING DIRECTOR r CLERK AND RECORDER CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD s" _ -` DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE"P1�LOF CARBON PLACE TONHQ�$ C„ < I NOT; TO THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA,IS WTHIN THE CITY < OF BOZEMAN MASTER PLAN AREA AND CAN BE PROVIDED WITH MUNICIPAL € L.__ __1 _.,.._ ALL AREAS WTHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND OUTSIDE THE INDIVIDUAL - 1 LOT BOUNDARIES WILL BE COMMON SPACE OWNED EQUALLY BY FACILITIES FOR THE SUPPLY OF WATER AND DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE AND OF PUBLIC SERVICE -- - < SOLID WASTE. THEREFORE UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 76-4-124(1), - CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR I L THE NINETEEN LOTS. THIS TRACT IS NOT SUBJECT TO SANITARY RESTRICTION RANGE CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER S 1,PHILIP FORBES THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE, - " -t- I--•< - CERTIFICATE OF INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS I,STAN HUGHES,TREASURER OF GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA, OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA,DO HEREBY CERTIFY DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS BEEN I I_ _.I ,� ,._� � DATED h115—DAY Of __,A.D.,19-- THAT THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT HAS BEEN DULY EXAMINED. ��, < - I,THE UNDERSIGNED, -DO HEREBY CERTIFY DULY EXAMINED AND THAT NO REAL PROPERTY TAXES ASSESSED AND HAVE FOUND THE SAME TO CONFORM IC THE LAW, -ARRCOR AMANC'M- �_ _ - AFV1lVW.C�- -_— THAT BETWEEN_--, 1992 AND -1992.THE AND LEVIED ON THE LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED ARE DELINQUENT. APPROVE BOZEMAN IT. PUBLIC HEREBY U E OF ANY AND ALL LANDSATION TO THE CITY SHOWN ON OF "' REQUIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS WERE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE THE PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED TO SUCH USE. ! I WE S!DE —W� 61E WTH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ' I_ - 1 ��� ORE T J.FORGES DATED THIS DAY OF__—_ T �_L - - DATED THIS_DAY OF. A.D.,19�. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE - _—,A.D.,19___• --• CITY OF BOZEMAN TREASURER OF GALLATIN COUNTY — NES7 KO ST. - DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE - 1 ® © © © ® 0 L APE LEGEND ST�R�`�ATFR �� !T{C� CA CS _ j SCLOOL DISTRICT NO.7 SYMBOL TNICAL NAME COMMONNAME PLANTING MA RE 0 j ..-..-..-..- _$E4OR HIGH SGHGGL- _" -..-..-_.. _ - SURFACE AREA (EXG.) AREA (DEV. COEFFICIENT , S 50 Fr_ GRAVEL 0 0 .60ACEflPLA ANOI S NORWAY MAPLE 2'GAL BtB 8 I "w N WEST MAIN ST. (US 191) GRASS 87,083 54,579 .20 0. � 3 FRAXINUS GREEN ASH 1 1/2'-2 50 F=f. 19 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS { PENNSYLYUS GAL.B+B -T - --- -- EXISTING SITE - C=.A6 DEVELOPED SITE- C=.462 E � JUNIPERUS SABINA(.� I : : I ----- T - TAM JUNIPER 18 -24 3 FT. 150 o u'IL - - , eSVT (Ox.95)+(Ox,85)+(87,083x.20)= .200 (17,090x.95)+(15,414x.85)+(54,579x.20) .462 TAMARISCIFOLIA _ _ i 87,083 87,083 i ._ 1 - I;- PRUNUS X CISTENA PURPLE LEAF PLUM 2•GAL B+B 8 FT 15 _� I _l - - 1 _ - I. PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF 10 YR. STORM II. DEVELOPED SITE RUNOFF- 10 YR. STORM { SITE SLOPE CE SITE SLOPE- 1% I TRAVEL DISTANCE+ 630' TRAVEL DISTANCE-630' - _- _ ---- - C= .200(PRE-DEVELOPED SITE) C= .462(DEVELOPED SITE) ! - -- -� Tc= 42 MIN.(FIG.22) Tc= 30 MIN. (FIG.22) I`, r `mot, E " SETBACK AREA-40,081 S.F. SITE CALCULATIONS J? I - -.65 I { I I ) - i- .41 IN.PER HR. i .41 INc PER HR. TOTAL AREA=87,083 S.F. AREA %OF TOTAL i i tJ 1 - PRE-EXISTING RUNOFF IS: 0 .200A(.41) (B'0B�"' 1 =.16-CFS EXISTING RUNOFF TOTAL AREA MINUS SETBACKS + 47,062 S.F. 100% ,3560�z ac// - r - ------- - -- . _. _. _ OPEN AREA MINUS SETBACKS 29,912 S.F. 64% - - DEVELOPED RUNOFF IS: I I, .. CiA T J _ .462 41 •06�Fr a 38 CFS DEVELOPED RUNOFF �) LANDSCAPE AREA MINUS SETBACKS " 14,498 S.F. 31% rI � (CARSGhI� CHEOUAMEGONI ( ) �,u60 Rz ac) _ 3{VALLEY OF l o PLACE , VILLAGE P.U.D. III.REQUIRED RETENTION VOLUME®.16 CFS RUNOFF(EXISTING) jl LANDSCAPE AREA WrrH SETBACKS 54,579 S.F. 63% LL��� 1 E FLOWERS I - Ico PAVED AREA 15,414 S.F. 33% TIME 1,R nn. "EE°Rwc°m 1 ! z 11 2 60 .16 1180 ...._.__2'21 11j-,11 < BUILDING AREA 17,090 S.F. 36% III F P ! � REQUIRED RETENTION VOLUME 0.60 CFS RUNOFF(DEVELOPED) z ¢ TIME HR ista wnn. °wwuxm 0 O 2 60 j .38 2728 U _ lr _( - z ir cn W f 1 l -� - N ---- O I ARCO M N S i -ARRANGE - RR I 1 jI, ENT O - M RRAN M NT O� wE siDEr� s0� . REF ADJOINERS ZONING I j Aq mON q m N :� PL-1 WEST KO CH ST. NORTH: ❑1 MARY C/O N.A.ABOLNGER(BOX 1047) U 2 {1 ... . ... ... ... BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 w WEST. E❑ CAROL J.GRAYBILL R-3 ,�.�II 1325 W. BABCOCK ! 1 '-' 1 w " W* BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 h--I - TO MHk79 132'-0" F FROM PROP.LINE TO MHk2 N PEDESTRIAN TRAIL FROM PROP.LINE io, } �J RIM EL.=4808.35 1 0 o AND BIKE PATH \� FL.EL. -4798.01 RIM EL.-480564 1. 20'X 70'X 2'D-- ❑3 LUTHER&NELLIE K.REEL R-3 '"- , FL EL.=4796.20 1336 W.BABCOCK i!I T^ I I I STORMWATER RET.- I __ EXIST.TO-SS MAIN BOZEMAN,MT.59715 N(659.45� •• -- •. •_may. I /p: AREA(2728 CU.FT.) i 78.2T \� a6:00' 22.00' 22.0�V/ 220' 22.00' 37.0 00 �22.OD' 22.00' 3162' 3L62' 22.00' 22.OD' 37.0'�' .00 '22.00' 22.00' 22.00' 36.00' 5. 4 I 'I 4 ERICHARD E.DWGHT R-3 � c r 1 ___ ____ - _ _- .-_ _ __ _ 20 W.BABCOCK - B T.59715 _ _ c 130 C 8'-0-SETBACK_• HERITAGE AN M DO A S IA N R 3 1t111 I T ❑ C/O JOHN S.N FRENCH�JR.(218 PIONEER DRIVE) BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 j I I $, I � I �E o � '� g EAST; 6❑ KATHRYN H.CONSER R-3 g I Y O \\ O "c0' O O G G O `� O OO O C C ^I N N f N N N N I N ^ N j 7 n� I ¢ %/• `, .•,1 \ w BOZEMAN,AMT.O 9715 I I o /•• i //.. 1 ,I f _ _ \ �\. ,,,f,, ,\`t m ❑7 R.LEE WOODRIFF&ALEXIS PARLOVA R-3521 W.GRANT ST. BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 :d - - - SOUTH: ❑ W. CHALLENDER R 3 OU 8 RALPH AND MARION - 4 222 S.13TH EXISTING F.H. IS.2T\`', - 36 ¢ �2 2 0 �2 2 \.• 3 I I 22 1 i 2. Q' 311 2' 31. 2' �2 2 0' 3rp1. 2210 2 Q' -22.10 3� 0 ,.5 4' I BOZEMAN,MT.59715 .j �- I ., �' - - 1 ❑9 MIKE STEINER R-3 I • S 6 000') �+.. N3 M - I 1 _ BOZEM n." T. 59715 "(31H AVE,i1. -�.-_� �_ ---_ g_!___�.-.J._ �_-_ _�-'--�_-_-Lg__ -�_ -_L .0 L SOUTHWEST: 10 JAMES E. AN MARLENE SHORT R 3 --'- v SOU D - �r--------- T--- NEW 6"WATER MAIN II --INSTALL '� INSTALL - \r CONNECT TO INSTALL SS MH - SS MH INSTALL SS MH SS MH -CURB&GUTTER `-INSTALL SS MHj� T 59715 - - .- � 221 S. 13TH I BOZEMAN,M. .__..__.._... NEW B`,$S-MAIN_ I .___.... ._.. ._..... _"'._._._._..-._..__ _ "WATER _u .. i CITY OFIBOZEMAN V ' 11 JARVIS AND SUE ANNE BROWN ft-3 -'---- --- -- -I------_- _.---- '- -------r--- - --- --�' ----- -^ 305 S. 13TH I i w��--CONNECT TO EXIST. I i r TO MH 80 136'0" J BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 k -MHk3-370 O" 6"WATER MAIN I FROM PROP.LINE FROM MH 2 CITY OF BOZEMAN i I I RIM EL.=4808.84 j I I RIM EL. $4807.43 I - 12 JANET 0.SERTINO R-3 FL EL. 4799.19 FL.EL.=4797.56 i 309 S.13TH BOZEMAN,MT.59715 30'-0"SS EASE. i _ 30'-0"SS EASE. 13 JAMES F. &ALICE T. SARGENT R-3 'Iy 222 S.14TH I i - J ❑ BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 I ; 14 J.ROGER&SYI-VIA D.MCCORMICK R-3 BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 I � I I 15 EARL J. &JANICE M.PEACE R-3 -:� A OVERALL SITE-- PLAN M �j BOZEMAN,MT.59715 I Al 1"=30'o., Z rrrNlll y� I r_._..__._ I i ; P I I i k I ! i 1 9 EASEMESEWE EAI`IR i I I I i TRAIL- N(659.45 ' I � zdPEDESTRIAN 0' 22 0' 22.00' 22.00 37.0' _00' 31.62' 31.62' 22.00' 22.00' 37.0 .00' 22.00' 22.00' 22.00' 36.00' 5 4'78.2T 6.0 0 Q is I I I F k z i I I I I I 771 z } 8 O O O O O O N \ rW E=-A w 1 I o r r r r r r r z i 78i 27 I I 36. 0 22.0 --2.00 _ 22.0 ' 1-1-TTI2.00I 3 0 22.0 I I 12.00'I 31. 2' 31. 2 I 22A. 2.00 I 3 0' -- - �.Oo' 22 00 22 00' 122 OD'-- I- 36.00 5 ..._... ti 1 hWW - 5'-6'WIDE ._. . -N 137N AVE 8 U b I I BOULEVARD _ I_ 1 - s O a E........_..a 1 4" 'STE E WALK I ... I I I �^W _ p E IN ITSIRETY 11`I PHASE 1 --i i �TEMPORARY CURB AND ,I 24'D WITH PAS 1 i ]] m'0 m m 1! O a)i o' i � If L J t_I__...i _. r I____.J L__.__1 L__, .._ 1 L_ .i 1 .. _` I__._I N � _ � ,- - --.. ...... ........ J.__,_._... ...._... _.._ --...,... ---..-- _,�..._._.._...- _._ _,.... __... --...._.. W_ _.._. . ........__... _.,_ .......... .__..__.._._ _....,_ ......... I i S I PROPOSED OVERALL.. SITE PLAN - PHASE I I i CA N 4 i W tl � O 1 ! { R p 30,SEWER L—_--__--_—J EASEMENT € 1 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL t - — --- -- — 37. - — N(659.45� 22.00 37.0' O' 00. ' [�22T.003�.;oll-- 8 22.0' 2.00' 22.00 2' 0 22.00 00F — 5.94 W I I I I d of I o O 0 O O O, .'N O N T7� N Nor^ I 3 II m � ' I € Z , -E I , -- I Ira 0 1 78.27' 36. 0' 22. 2.00' 22.0 2.00' 3.0' 22.0 2.00' 31. 2' 31 2' 22. ]2,00' 3.0' 22.0 2.00' 22.0 36.00, 5.44' l pa i > ' - STANDARD STORM 13TH AVE S. SIDEWALK I BOULEVARD rT U DRAIN INLET Cr ;. 1 ici € I I 1 I V...__-..-_-._.__ _3 I ti v INLET CASTING 'NEENAH'R-3067 OR'FCO'515-7 C ! PROPOSED FINAL OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE 11 � � f736' .C.P. ------ ....___ ASTM G-76 GLASS 2 BLOCK-OUT FOR OUTLET PIPE 601-0'R.O.W. __.._........-- I wi / S'-6' 38-0'B.O.C. I B.O.C. - ) I ! y —CITY OF BOZEMAN 1.5'MINUS— - I ASPHALT APPL-IED a a STD.INTEGRAL CONC. ROAD BASE IN 2'LIFTS 27_` CURB AND GUTTER I 1:4 MAX.TYP. 4:4 MAX.TYR, 2y P 2Y. 6$'�'aG 6'PRECAST 3V. BASE. ' ..£.^s ..a,.,' ..,.<a,;:.,. Y.,,.,tom. ....;;:;.sk�x✓.:.c:x,:,,C...�.cv„s..CSf ems.x_.. .. P �.'Y s <.. -., �1 6'MINUS PIT - ., PUN SUBBASE 43'O.D. c: a STREET PROFILF (13TH AVE. S�:lJTH) STD. STORM DRAIN INLET �7 ITEM 3. MINUTES OF MAY 6, 1997 President Devitt asked if there were any additions, deletions or corrections to the May 6, 1997, Planning Board minutes. There being none,the minutes were approved as distributed. ITEM 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. Major Subdivision Application#P-9719 - (University Condominiums) - A Major Subdivision Application,proposed by Diamond enterprises, Inc.,to subdivide 3.49 acres of land to create 34 condominium units on property located at 1800 West Kagy Boulevard. (Skelton) President James Devitt reviewed the Consent Agenda item process. If neither the applicant nor any member of the public wishes to speak on the proposal(or object to its conditions), and if no Board member wishes to remove it from the Consent Agenda for more in- depth discussion and consideration,the item can be acted upon per staff s recommendation with no further discussion upon a motion to approve the item. Noting condition#3 relating to common open space provisions, Clark Babcock questioned if there is some assurance that the condition will be enforced. Planner Skelton responded that the open space requirement is dependent upon whether or not the units remain apartments or are marketable as condominiums and the final plat is filed. The applicant,he said, has discussed the elimination of parking at the north end of units 25 and 26 to provide a common open space area. He added that he understands that some of the units are on escrow. MOTION-Dick McConnen moved, seconded by Richard Monahan, to recommend approval of Planning Application#P-9719 with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report and a waiver of the Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement requirements. The motion carried 9-0, forwarding a unanimous recommendation of approval to the City Commission for its consideration at the 3:00 p.m. meeting on Monday June 2, 1997. ITEM 5. PROJECT REVIEWS A. Major Subdivision Application#P-9715 - (Carson Place Townhouses) - A Major Subdivision Application,proposed by Don Bockhahn,represented by Springer Group Architects, to create 19 townhouse lots on a 1.9 acre tract of land located at 1304 West Babcock Street. (Skelton) B. Planned Unit Development Application#Z-9726 - (Carson Place Townhouses) - A Planned Unit Development Application, in conjunction with subdivision review, for the development of a 19-unit townhouse complex and related site improvements, that would allow one of four townhouse structures to contain 6 dwelling units, exceeding the maximum of five dwelling units per structure allowed City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 2 MINUTES `' PLANNING BOARD MEETING MAY 20, 1997 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE The regular meeting of the City-County Planning Board was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by President James Devitt. Members Present: Members Absent: James Devitt, President Bill Wright Michael Vincent Richard Monahan Sandra Smiley Clark Babcock Lonny Walker Bill Mitchell John Mandeville Dick McConnen Staff Present: Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Therese Berger, Recording Secretary Visitors Registered/Present: Ralph Olsen Bin Chang Dennis Foreman Don Bockhahn Lowell Springer ITEM 2. PUBLIC COMMENT President James Devitt indicated that the City-County Planning Board is implementing an agenda item to invite the public to ask questions or to comment on general planning issues which are not agenda items. Ralph Olsen, 1605 West Kagy Boulevard, expressed concern regarding the amount of traffic on Kagy.Boulevard, and increasing traffic with increasing development in the area. As it is now,he said,he must turn around in the driveway to exit his residence as it would be impossible to back out. He reminded Board members that his is a residential neighborhood and asked for consideration in respect to further development that might impact Kagy. City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 1 in the "R-Y (Residential Medium Density)District. (Skelton) Senior Planner Dave Skelton reviewed the Staff Report(on file at the City-County Planning Office), noting that the application is a subdivision planned unit development(PUD) because the developer wishes to phase the improvements to the street, and a zoning PUD because the developer wishes to construct one of the townhouse structures to contain six dwelling units, thus exceeding the maximum density of five dwelling units per townhouse structure allowed in the "R-Y (Residential Medium Density)District. He discussed the initial concern by the adjoining property owners to the east concerning the South 13th Avenue right-of-way, and indicated that the applicant has been working with the owners,R.L. Woodriff and the Parlova's,on obtaining a 48'wide public street and utility easement for the street improvements. Mr. Skelton noted the receipt of a letter from Sylvia Miller, a tenant of the mobile home court to the east, and described conversations with tenants of this court who have received a two year notice that they will have to move within two years of the development of the subject property. A third letter from Dr. Robert Wolfe,residing.in Colorado, expressed concern that no access be permitted from Pioneer Drive,that the structures not exceed two stories in height, and that the five dwelling units per structure rule not be expanded to six or more. Mr. Skelton indicated that the first two concerns are not valid given the development design, and that he attempted to contact Dr. Wolfe regarding the advantages in terms of open space the PUD would provide. Planner Skelton discussed the Design Review Board's (DRB)recommendation that the open space area be relocated to the vicinity of the southernmost 30'wide utility easement (between the 6-plex and the 4-plex). Noting that the DRB also recommended additional deciduous and coniferous plantings near the chain link fence along the southern property boundary,he stated that the application provides 51.2% open space. i Mr. Skelton corrected an error in recommended subdivision condition#8, which implies that curb and gutter must be installed as part of Phase I on both sides of South 13th Avenue. It is the intention of the Development Review Committee,he said, that the applicant construct approximately the south 400 feet of South 13th Avenue to a 37 foot paved width with City standard curb, gutter and boulevard sidewalk on the west side, and a rolled asphalt curb on the east side, with no gutter or boulevard. The remaining length of West Babcock Street with Phase I will be constructed to a paved twenty-four foot wide street with sidewalk on the west side and a rolled asphalt curb on the east side. During Phase II construction, the remaining north portion of South 13th Avenue will be improved to a full City standard street of 37 feet with curb, gutter and boulevard sidewalk on the west side. Lonny Walker questioned whether provisions are built in for Phase II street improvements if the property owner to the east does not develop his property within two years. Planner Skelton responded that Phase II street improvements are dependent upon the marketability of the Phase II units. Mr. Walker confirmed with Planner Skelton that in order to complete more than 10 units, the applicant would have to make the necessary street improvements. He does not know, however, whether the road will be built to a full standard 2, 5, or 10 years from now. City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 3 Responding to Dick McConnen, Planner Skelton suggested the Board consider the 6-plex in relation to PUD open space requirements that would not apply if the applicant proposed a 5- plex. He added that the number of units might not make much of a difference in terms of mass and viewsheds. Lowell Springer, applicant's architect, commented that Don Bockhahn has been working hard to find a way to get 13th Avenue through to continue the grid pattern of the transportation system. All of the comments from the neighbors,he added,have been positive. Don Bockhahn, applicant, indicated that although he introduced development plans for the property to the neighbors five years ago,the project has undergone a series of design changes. Upon revisiting the neighbors with this design,he said that most were receptive to the proposal and relieved that improvements might be made to the trailer court property. President Devitt OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING. After three calls for public testimony, and hearing none, he CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING. MOTION- Lonny Walker moved, seconded by Sandra Smiley, to recommend approval of Planning Application#P-9716 with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report and condition#8 amended to clarify its intent. The motion carried 9-0, forwarding a unanimous recommendation of approval to the City Commission for its consideration at the 3:00 p.m.meeting on Monday, June 2, 1997. Calling attention to recommended zoning condition#8, Planner Skelton reviewed the zoning PUD application. In response to Dick McConnen, Don Bockhahn stated that the adjoining property owner to the west has agreed to relocate the existing mailboxes and dumpster outside of the proposed public street and utility easement for the extension of South 13th Avenue as specified in recommended condition#12. Noting the utility easements across the subject property, Lowell Springer commented that the that the open space relocation would work out well; however he suggested the 6-plex be allowed to maintain at least a 15 foot setback from southern property line. He stated that the property owner to the east has agreed to the language in the public street and utility easement document and has verbally agreed to sign it. The development team indicated that in negotiating with this property owner,they have agreed to install the water and sewer laterals, as well as platted lots for the future development of his property. Commenting that a more central location of the open space makes more sense, Michael Vincent questioned how the applicant feels about relocating the open space. Lowell Springer replied that the only concern is that the plan has been presented as submitted to the neighbors. . City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 4 President Devitt questioned how far the residence immediately south is from the property line. Lowell Springer responded that the house is approximately 11 feet from the property line. li President Devitt weighed impacts to the neighbor immediately south of the property against providing a more centralized open space area to the residents of the development. He expressed concern that the neighbor to the south might feel differently about a reduced setback. Planner Skelton noted that the minimum side yard setback in the zoning district is 8 feet. He suggested the applicant propose a 15 foot setback to the southernmost neighbor, and that the Board provide some flexibility in terms of establishing a definitive setback. Agreeing that a more central open space location would benefit the residents of the development, Dick McConnen suggested that it would also would break up the expanse of street. Clark Babcock offered his support of requiring a minimum of a 15 foot setback from the southern property line to the 6-plex and relocating the open space. Responding to John Mandeville,Lowell Springer remarked that the applicant is in agreement with the recommended conditions of approval if some flexibility is provided in zoning PUD condition#8 to allow a 15 foot setback from the southern property line. Don Bockhahn commended Planner Skelton for his patience and direction throughout the five year process of the development design. He thanked the Board for its consideration. MOTION-Lonny Walker moved, seconded by Sandra Smiley, to recommend approval of Zoning Application#Z-9726 with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report and an amendment to condition#8 to allow a minimum of 15 feet setback from the 6-plex to the southern property line. The motion carried 9-0, forwarding a unanimous recommendation of approval to the City Commission for its consideration at the 3:00 p.m. meeting on Monday, June 2, 1997. Responding to Lonny Walker,Don Bockhahn indicated that although he originally hoped the units could be sold in the $75,000 range, they are now hoping to maintain$100,000 price range. ITEM 6. OLD BUSINESS -None ITEM 7. NEW BUSINESS - None ITEM 8. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT-None ITEM 9. PRESIDENT'S REPORT Bill Mitchell announced the Society of Wetlands conference to be held June 2nd tarough June 6th at MSU, and provided the Recording Secretary meeting and registration information to City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 5 be made available to any interested Board members. ITEM 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board,the May 20, 1997, Planning Board meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m.. Dave Skelton, Senior Planner James Devitt, President City-County Planning Office City-County Planning Board City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 6 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA May 19, 1997 The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, May 19, 1997, at 3:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Stueck, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Acting City Manager Brey, Staff Attorney Cooper and Acting Clerk of the Commission Erlandson. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. None of the Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed for discussion. Minutes - May 5, 1997 It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the minutes of the meeting of May 5, 1997, be approved as submitted. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit - CaS'r r o Place Townhouses - planned unit development to allow development of subdivision of 1.9-acre tract for 19-unit townhouse complex and allow one of four townhouse structures to contain six dwelling units - Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn (1304 West Babcock Street) (P-9716 and`Z=97726) This was the time and place set for review of preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Carson Place Townhouses, as requested by Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn, under Application Nos. P-9716 and Z-9726. Under the preliminary plat application, a 1 .91-acre tract located in the East one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 12, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, is to be subdivided into 19 townhouse residential lots. Under the conditional use permit for planned unit development, the applicant is proposing the development of 19 townhouse units in four buildings, with one of the buildings to contain six dwelling units, thus exceeding the maximum density of five allowed per townhouse structure by one. The subject property is more commonly located at 1304-13 t 2 West Babcock 05-19-97 • - 2 - Street. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the review of preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Carson Place Townhouses, as requested by Lowell Springer for Don Bockhahn, under Application Nos. P-9716 and Z-9726, be continued until June 2, 1997. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Rudberg and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Preliminary Plat review - North Meadows Subdivision, Phase II - subdivide 7.9± acres into five lots for residential development; revisions to Phase I to relocate park and reconfigure lots in Blocks 1 and 4 - located in the NW'/4, Section 11 , T2S, R5E, MPM (south side of Durston Road, west of Hunters Way) (P-9715) This was the time and place set for review of the preliminary plat, requested by Thomas, Dean and Hoskins, Inc., under Application No. P-9715, for the North Meadows Subdivision, Phase II, to subdivide 7.9 ± acres located in the northwest quarter of Section 11 , Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian, into five lots for residential development. The application also covers revisions to Phase I, to relocate the designated parkland and reconfigure lots in Blocks 1 and 4. The property is more commonly located on the south side of Durston Road, west of Hunters Way. Assistant Planner Chris Saunders gave the staff report, noting that the property is still undergoing the annexation process to_the City of Bozeman, and that it should be completed shortly, with zoning to follow thereafter. The Planner stressed that, under this application, the total number of lots in Phase I has not changed. Planner Saunders said that, due to the rearrangement of the lots, the zoning will have to be adjusted, but this will not be difficult since the zoning has not been finally adopted. I Assistant Planner Saunders noted that, following its public hearing, the City-County Planning Board forwarded their recommendation of approval on May 6, subject to several conditions. The Planner said there is adequate ability to provide infrastructure for water, but a concern identified in both phases of the project is a series of bottlenecks downstream from the property in the sewer system. He said that, for Phase I, the applicants were required to construct either a relief sewer, or an alternative that they were able to identify. The Planner noted the applicants proposed an alternative and will use the same alternative for Phase II. He 05-19-97 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION/AGENDA MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA May 27, 1997 The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in work session and agenda meeting in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, May 27, 1997, at 3:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Stueck, Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Youngman, City Attorney Luwe (also serving as Acting Acting City Manager) and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. Commissioner Frost was absent. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. Authorize absence of Commissioner Frost from this meeting, in compliances with Section 7-3-4322(2), M.C.A. It was moved by Commissioner Rudberg, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission authorize the absence of Commissioner Frost from this meeting, in compliance with Section 7-3-4322(2), M.C.A. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Rudberg, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Stueck; those voting No, none. Agenda Meeting - for regular meeting and public hearings to be held on June 2, 1997 Since this is an agenda meeting, only those issues requiring staff action are contained —in the minutes. City Attorney Luwe briefly reviewed the background information whic�� was included in the Commissioners' packets. �Uyw (4) Senior Planner Dave Skelton gave a brief overview of the project, reviewing the recommended revision to one of the conditions forwarded by staff. Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, the Planner stated that the condition requiring information on downstream water rights was designed as a safety precaution to ensure the protection of any potential downstream water rights. (5) Senior Planner Skelton gave a brief overview, noting that this proposal is the culmination of five years of discussions between the developer and the Planning staff. He 05-27-97 h: ' 2 - briefly highlighted the differences between this proposal and the one submitted five years ago, identifying the features which make this a more attractive proposal. He stated that, in conjunction with this project, South 13th Avenue is to be extended to West Babcock Street. Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, the Senior Planner confirmed that the Commission cannot consider a conceptual proposal to develop the adjacent property with duplex structures in conjunction with this application. Mayor Stueck expressed concern about Condition No. 7, which requires that a typical color palette be provided. He stated that ColorLok siding comes in a limited number of basic colors, and he feels this condition is inappropriate. Senior Planner Skelton responded that, if the Commission wishes, it may delete the condition. He noted, however, that if this color palette is included in the restrictive covenants and by-laws, it can ensure that someone will not paint one of the units an inappropriate color in the future. (6) Responding to Commissioner Rudberg, Animal Control Officer Connie Lien confirmed that if this kennel license is revoked, two dogs may still be retained at the subject residence. She indicated that there are four people living at the residence at the present time. Responding to Commissioner Youngman, City Attorney Luwe stated that the case involving the nuisance dog is pending in City Court and, depending on the outcome of that case, the dog may or may not be allowed to continue living at this location. Commissioner Rudberg stated she is concerned about this location, and is not sure dogs should be allowed on the site at all because it is not clean, nor is it fenced. She also expressed her concern that if the problem dog is removed from the site by being taken to the Humane Society, it will be "recycled" back out to another home in the community. Responding to Commissioner Youngman, the City Attorney stated that the supporting documentation will be submitted in next week's packets. (7) City Attorney Luwe stated that the staff's comments should be ready for inclusion in this week's packets. He noted that if they are not, this item will be removed from the agenda for a week. (a15) �S'enio•r,0 Planp Skelton provided an overview of the application, stating that neighborhood comment in opposition to this application has been received. He said the 05-27-97 CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD " STAFF REPORT ITEM: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. Z-9726--AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES CONSISTING OF NINETEEN TOWNHOUSE SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED AT 1304 WEST BABCOCK STREET ZONED "R-3", (RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM DENSITY) APPLICANT: LOWELL SPRINGER,FOR DON BOCKHAHN SPRINGER GROUP ARCHITECTS 1500MOUNTAIN GOAT RD. 201 SOUTH WALLACE AVENUE BOZEMAN,MT.59715 BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 1997, AT 3:30 P.M., I14 THE MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL,411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN REPORT BY: DAVE SKELTON SENIOR PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Project Description: The subject property is described as being located at 1304 West Babcock Street and is legally identified as a tract of land located in the E 1/2, SW 1/4 of Section 12, T2S,R5E, M.P.M., Gallatin County,Montana,being approximately 1.908 acres in size. The application for a Conditional Use Permit is to develop a 19-unit townhouse residential development as a planned unit development(P.U.D.)under Chapter 18.54 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. As a result, Section 18.54.05.0 sets forth preliminary plan review,by the advisory bodies, which involves a recommendation to the Planning Board and City Commission by the Bozeman Design Review Board regarding land use relationships, densities, and the type, size and location of the principal design elements of the planned unit development. The developer, Mr. Don Bockhahn,proposes to develop four townhouse structures consisting of four to six dwelling units per townhouse structure each contain approximately 1150 sq. ft. and a single-car garage. The project is anticipated to developed as a two phase P.U.D. development with no anticipated buildout date scheduled for the entire project. Development of the project will require p � p J P P J q the construction of South 13th Avenue from its current location south of the property to West Babcock Street as a full City standard street, which will be completed with phase two. The exterior treatment of the townhouse structures will consist of horizontal color-lok siding with a 6-inch exposure and architectural asphalt shingles on 4-in-12 pitched gable roofs. No color palete for the development has been specified; however, the developer has suggested the use of neutral colors with accent colors on the corner trim and entryways to each unit. 2. Background The design concept proposed in this application for a Conditional Use Permit is the result of informal reviews with the D.R.C. and D.R.B., as well as P.U.D. concept plan review with D.R.B. The application is a response to input provided by the two advisory bodies which has occurred over the past five years. Provided in the application is a bound,written narrative which contains near the back of the document, comments provided by the D.R.B.between December, 1992 and March, 1993. Those comments provided by the D.R.B. are the general basis of the applicant's revised design. 3. List of Deviations: The applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to the develop the 19-unit townhouse development as a zoning and subdivision P.U.D. to: 1.. Allow the south most'residential structure to exceed the maximum allowable townhouse cluster of five(5)dwelling units per structure in the "R-3" zoning district(Section 18.20.020); and 2. To develop a public street in phase one that would be constructed at a standard less than a full City standard streei,which would then be constructed to a full City standard street with phase two. The subject property is not located in an overlay district of the Zoning Ordinance and will not require a Certificate of Appropriateness. As a result, a deviation to the Zoning Ordinance is also not applicable. 3. Architectural Review: As noted previously, the applicant has redesigned the site plan, orientation of structures and townhouse units based on the comments provided by the D.R.C. and D.R.B. The proposal to develop the subject property in 1992 involved a residential, single-family development containing one-story residential dwellings focused on an interior private street with a deadend cul-de-sac and minimal pedestrian circulation, open space and landscape. The summary of the D.R.B.'s comments in 1992-93 are provided in the applicant's written narrative and generally involved the following issues: 1. Need for additional open space and landscape. Larger rear yards for the single family dwellings. 2 Need for adequate pedestrian circulation both on-site and with adjacent neighborhoods. 3. Need for adequate on-street parking and boulevard sidewalks. ` :I t 4. Greater emphasis on window treatment, architectural detail and covered porches. 4. Historic Preservation Officer Comments: The subject property is not located in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. 5. Public Comment: The Planning Office has not received any public comment as of the writing of this staff summary report. 6. Staff Conclusion: The developer has applied for a Conditional Use Permit in order to proceed with a townhouse planned unit development that would promote maximum flexibility and innovation on a parcel of land that is long, linear and narrow. The density of the proposal has been reduced from twenty-two to nineteen dwelling units and redesigned to address the comments of the D.R.C. and D.R.B., while maintaining the ability to establish the project as affordable housing. i Based on the above summary review,the Planning Office recommends that with the following recommended conditions that the proposal would meet the intent and purpose of a planned unit development. Therefore the Planning Office recommends to the Design Review Board conditional approval of the application for a Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide additional landscape in the common open space areas that contains a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; 2. That the boulevard streetscape be continued to the south boundary of said property and that the applicant ensure that the location of the sanitary sewer and water service lines will not conflict with the formal arrangement of boulevard trees along South 13th Avenue, and that the site plan be revised accordingly prior to Final Site Plan approval; 3. That the applicant provide a screening device along adjacent residential properties that is consistent and/or compatible with existing fencing constructed by adjacent properties and that a typical screening detail be provided prior to Final Site Plan approval; 4. That the applicant provide a typical detail on the site plan verifying the construction of a patio area at the rear of each townhouse unit that also includes the screening device proposed between each unit,if any, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 5. That the applicant construct covered entryways'on each of the townhouse units facing onto South 13th Avenue and that a typical detail be provided for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 6. That yardlights be installed along the street frontage of South 13th Avenue and that a typical detail and location of the fixtures be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 7. That the applicant provide a typical color palette for the townhouse development that is also verified on the exterior building elevations, which discourages the use of bright, obtrusive colors, for ' review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; and 8. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit within one(1)year of receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness and Major Site Plan Review approval, and prior to proceeding with construction of the project. NOTE: The Design Review Board will forward a formal recommendation to the Bozeman City-County Planning Board and Bozeman City Commission,by formal motion, regarding this Conditional Use Permit application for a public hearing to be held on May 6, 1997, and a public meeting on May 19, 1997. Attachments: Conditional Use Permit Application Mailed To: Lowell Springer, Springer Group Architects Don Bockhahn, Applicant • I i i ::� RT MAY-01-97 THU 02 :59 FM PARLI. 41..5 726 5070 P. 01 RECEIVED BY N.-fr. R.L.Woodriff MAY 0 2 1997 Air. & Mrs. A. Parlova CITY• GO.14TY KA1NNG 651 Poplar St Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 May 1, 1997 Bozeman City-County Planning Office O h h g 35 N. 13ozeman Ave-P.O.Box 640 Bozeman, Nfr 59771 ph 406 582 2360 FAX 406 582 2363 k : Conditional Use and Preliminary Subdivision Ph-it Approval for Springer GroupBackhahn project at 1304 W. Babcock ATT: Dave Skelton Dear Sir: 1. Please remove from your file our previous FAX response to the Carson Place Townhouses project of Springer Group/Dackhahn, and disregard the cope mailed this date with Remm Receipt Requested. 2, INT W RESPONSE: We are currently in negotiation with the Springer Group/ Backhahn to reinstate, update, and finalize an agreement in principle to cede a 13th Street Easement through our property at 1236 W. Babcock. This will only be possible if the City of Bozeman and your department of planning can assure us of the acceptability of the property remaining to us for the construction of duplexes or townhouses at least to the extent of a proposal drawn up by the Springer Group (a copy of which can be obtained from them), and that the ceding of the Easement will not interfere with the continued use of the "Grandfathered" use as a combination mobile park and single family housing until the use of our property is changed and developed as proposed. We feel positive about a project that proNides efficient use of land in the area by way of a single city street rather than separate roadway& in each of two adjoining properties. Sincereh,-, R.L.Woodriff, Mr.& 111x�. A. Parlova copy mailed certified, return receipt • Sylvia Miller 1232 W. Babcock #7 Bozeman, Mt. 59715 I 4/23/' 97 RECEIVED BY Bozeman City-County Planning Office APR 2 5 1997 P.O. Box 640 CITY-C=4TY KAN LNG Bozeman, Mt. 59771-0640 TO Whom It May Concern: I guess I 'm about to show my ignorance,but I would like to know what affect the impact is going to have that the townhouses that will proably be built on 1304 W. Babcock, how it was going to affect the moblir home. -park?????????? I own my own mobile home, but court is. owned by some- one living in California and is being managed by a local property management. According to the "lease" "we" have with the owner if we want to sell our mobiles , we 're sop2ose to give the owner of the court the first option to buyor if we don't take his offer,wecould sell it to some one else and.hhigeqiay have to move it . Is this considered Blockbusting?Would I have the right to file a greviance with the Fair Housing and equal opport- tunity ?????? I would like to hear from you. I would also like to know if this going to be one of these affordable housing programs ?. I don' t understand what you people define as affordable or why you would need to speed $8 ,000 .00 to do such a study. Sincerely, Sylvia Miller The Children's Hospital Kids Need A Kids'Hospital Cardiac Care Center 1056 East 19th Avenue Denver,Colorado 80218, May 6, 1997 Mark M. Boucek,MD r• „; Chief,Pediatric Cardiology Professor of Pediatrics Bozeman City-County Planning Office David R.Clarke,MID35 North Bozeman Avenue L!l t. . ;y + :•!>. .;j Chief,Pediatric Cardiothoracic P.O. Box 640 Surgery Bozeman,MT 59771-0640 Professor of Surgery Jenne Poll, MBA RE: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Planned Administrator Unit Development and a Preliminary Subdivision Plat Pediatric Cardiology-Box 100 Application for Carson Place Townhouses (303)861-6820 (303)837-2595(FAX) To Whom It May Concern: Curt DeGroH, MD Instructor of Pediatrics As an adjacent homeowner, I would like to make the following comments. D.Dunbar Ivy, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics 1. That no access be permitted from Pioneer Drive. Bill Pietra, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics 2. The structure not be more than two stories in height, blocking the view of the Michael S.Schaffer,MD current townhouses. Associate Professor of Pediatrics Elizabeth M.Shaffer,MD 3. The five dwelling per structure rule not be expanded to six or more. Associate Professor of Pediatrics Robin Shandas, PhD Sincerely, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Henry M.Sondhelmer,MD Professor of Pediatrics Lilllam M. Valdes-Cruz,MD Robert R. Wo D. Professor of Pediatrics Professor of Pediatrics James W.Wiggins,Jr.,MD Section of Cardiology Professor of Pediatrics Robert R.Wolfe,MD RRW/cs Professor of Pediatrics Heidi Bicknell,RN Transplant Coordinator Mary Luna,RN Transplant Coordinator Marilyn Day, MS, RD Nutritionist Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery-Box 200 (303)861-6660 (303)764-8022(FAX) David N.Campbell, MD Professor of Surgery Esther Carpenter, RN Cardiac Nurse Clinician Affiliated with QJ University of Colorado Health Sciences Center I General Contracting, Inc. 1500 Mountain Goat Tr. Bozeman,MT 59715 Established- 1975 (406)586-2185 May 20, 1997 City of Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59715 I, Don Bockhahn, have reviewed the conditions set forth by the City of Bozeman Planning Staff and I am in agreement . Do . Bocofialm Carson Place Townhouses PUD RESOLUTION#Z-9726 RESOLUTION OF THE BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOP APPROXIMATELY 1.91 ACRES FOR THE CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES TO ALLOW ONE OF FOUR TOWNHOUSE STRUCTURES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DENSITY OF FIVE DWELLING UNITS PER TOWNHOUSE STRUCTURE IN THE "R-3" (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY) DISTRICT, ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE E V2 OF THE SWIA OF SECTION 12, T2S,R5E, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AND MORE COMMONLY LOCATED AT 1304-1312 WEST BABCOCK STREET. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman and the Gallatin County Commission have adopted a Master Plan pursuant to 76-1-604, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS,the Bozeman City-County Planning Board has been created by Resolution of the Bozeman City Commission as provided for in Title 76-1-101, M.C.A., 1993, and a jurisdictional area created under 76-1-504, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board has been designated by the City Commission to serve as the Bozeman Zoning Commission as provided in 76-1-108, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS, the proposed Conditional Use Permit application for a Planned Unit Development to develop a approximately 1.91 acres for the Carson Place Townhouses to allow one of four townhouse structures to exceed the maximum density of five dwelling units per townhouse structure in the "R-3" (Residential Medium Density)District, on property located at 1304-1312 West Babcock Street, has been properly submitted, revieNved, and advertised in accordance with the procedures of Chapter 18.53, of the City of Bozeman Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board held a public hearing on May 20, 1997, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for said Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, there were no members of the public present to speak either in favor or against the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS,three letters of public comment were received regarding the Major Subdivision PUD proposal, expressing concerns either addressed in the application or not related to the application, and one which expressed concern that the five dwelling unit per structure requirement not be allowed to expand to six or more dwelling units per structure; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman City-County Planning Board found that the application complies or • with each of the approval criteria established in Chapter 18.53. of the Bozeman Zoning Code, as outlined in the Staff Report. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the Bozeman City-County Planning Board on a vote of 9-0 recommends to the Bozeman City Commission that the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development to develop approximately 1.91 acres for the Carson Place Townhouses to allow one of four townhouse structures to exceed the maximum density of five dwelling units per townhouse structure in the "R-3" (Residential Medium Density) District, on property located in the E1/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 12, T2S, RSE, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Montana, and more commonly located at 1304-1312 West Babcock Street, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide additional landscape in the common open space areas that contains a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; r 2. That the boulevard streetscape be continued to the south boundary of said property and that the applicant ensure that the location of the sanitary sewer and water service lines will not conflict with the formal arrangement of boulevard trees along South 13th Avenue, and that the site plan be revised accordingly prior to Final Site Plan approval; 3. That the applicant provide a screening device along adjacent residential properties that is consistent and/or compatible with existing fencing constructed by adjacent properties and that a typical screening detail be provided prior to Final Site Plan approval; 4. That the applicant provide a typical detail on the site plan verifying the construction of a patio area at the rear of each townhouse unit that also includes the screening device proposed between each unit, if any, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 5. That the applicant construct covered entryways on each of the townhouse units facing onto South 13th Avenue using two different entryway elevations, and that a typical detail be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 6. That yardlights be installed along the street frontage of South 13th Avenue and that a typical detail and location of the fixtures be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 7. That the applicant provide a typical color palette for the townhouse development that is also verified on the exterior building elevations, which discourages the use of bright,obtrusive colors, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 8. That the applicant relocate the common open space area located at the south end of the subject property to north of the six-unit townhouse structure such that it is located adjacent to the thirty (30) foot wide utility easement, that a minimum fifteen (15) foot side yard setback be established between the six-plex structure and the south property line, and that it be noted accordingly i r -• • • on the landscape site plan prior to Final Site Plan approval; 9. That the applicant confirm on the landscape site plan that the location of water and sanitary sewer service stubs will not conflict with the location of the boulevard streetscape trees along South 13th Avenue, and that it be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; 10. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit within one(1)year of receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness and Major Site Plan Review approval, and prior to proceeding with construction of the project; 11. A boulevard planting detail shall be provided and must comply with the Engineering Department standards. Root barrier material should be used. No plantings shall be allowed in the typical sidewalk location; 12. That the applicant submit to the Planning Office documentation of an agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east to relocate the garbage refuse area and mailboxes for the mobile home park to another location on said property, or that the applicant provide another alternative to relocate said structures outside of the public street and utility easement for the extension of South 13th Avenue to West Babcock Street, prior to Final Site Plan approval; 13 That eight (8) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the Bozeman City-County Planning Board shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six(6)months of the date of Planning Board approval. A copy of the approved Final Site Plan shall be forwarded to the Building, Street/Sanitation, Water/Sewer, Engineering, and Fire Departments by the Planning Office; and one copy shall be retained in the Planning Office file; 14 That the applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement; 15 That a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED; 16 If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve(12)months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9)months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security; and 17 That the applicant upon submitting the Final Site Plan for approval by the Planning Director and prior to issuance of a building permit shall submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval have been satisfied. DATED THIS 20th Day of May, 1997. Resolution#Z-9726. Andrew C. Epple, Director James Devitt, President City-County Planning Office City-County Planning Board i ITEM 3. MINUTES OF MAY 6, 1997 President Devitt asked if there were any additions, deletions or corrections to the May 6, 1997,Planning Board minutes. There being none,the minutes were approved as distributed. ITEM 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. Major Subdivision Application#P-9719 - (University Condominiums) - A Major Subdivision Application,proposed by Diamond enterprises, Inc.,to subdivide 3.49 acres of land to create 34 condominium units on property located at 1800 West Kagy Boulevard. (Skelton) President James Devitt reviewed the Consent Agenda item process. If neither the applicant nor any member of the public wishes to speak on the proposal(or object to its conditions), and if no Board member wishes to remove it from the Consent Agenda for more in- depth discussion and consideration,the item can be acted upon per staff s recommendation with no further discussion upon a motion to approve the item. Noting condition#3 relating to common open space provisions, Clark Babcock questioned if there is some assurance that the condition will be enforced. Planner Skelton responded that the open space requirement is dependent upon whether or not the units remain apartments or are marketable as condominiums and the final plat is filed. The applicant,he said, has discussed the elimination of parking at the north end of units 25 and 26 to provide a common open space area. He added that he understands that some of the units are on escrow. MOTION- Dick McConnen moved, seconded by Richard Monahan, to recommend approval of Planning Application#P-9719 with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report and a waiver of the Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement requirements. The motion carried 9-0, forwarding a unanimous recommendation of approval to the City Commission for its consideration at the 3:00 p.m.meeting on Monday June 2, 1997. "Y ITEM 5. PROJECT REVIEWS L I NI A w A. Major Subdivision Application#P-9715 - (Carson Place Townhouses) - A Major Subdivision Application,proposed by Don Bockhahn,represented by Springer Group Architects, to create 19 townhouse lots on a 1.9 acre tract of land located at 1304 West Babcock Street. (Skelton) B. Planned Unit Development Application#Z-9726 - (Carson Place Townhouses) - A Planned Unit Development Application, in conjunction with subdivision review, for the development of a 19-unit townhouse complex and related site improvements, that would allow one of four townhouse structures to contain 6 dwelling units, exceeding the maximum of five dwelling units per structure allowed City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 2 • • iI r PRELIMINARY in the "R-3" (Residential Medium Density)District. (Skelton) Senior Planner Dave Skelton reviewed the Staff Report(on file at the City-County Planning Office), noting that the application is a subdivision planned unit development(PUD) because the developer wishes to phase the improvements to the street, and a zoning PUD because the developer wishes to construct one of the townhouse structures to contain six dwelling units, thus exceeding the maximum density of five dwelling units per townhouse structure allowed in the "R-3" (Residential Medium Density)District. He discussed the initial concern by the adjoining property owners to the east concerning the South 13th Avenue right-of-way, and indicated that the applicant has been working with the owners,R.L. Woodriff and the Parlova's, on obtaining a 48' wide public street and utility easement for the street improvements. Mr. Skelton noted the receipt of a letter from Sylvia Miller, a tenant of the mobile home court to the east, and described conversations with tenants of this court who have received a two year notice that they will have to move within two years of the development of the subject property. A third letter from Dr. Robert Wolfe, residing in Colorado, expressed concern that no access be permitted from Pioneer Drive,that the structures not exceed two stories in height, and that the five dwelling units per structure rule not be expanded to six or more. Mr. Skelton indicated that the first two concerns are not valid given the development design, and that he attempted to contact Dr. Wolfe regarding the advantages in terms of open space the PUD would provide. Planner Skelton discussed the Design Review Board's(DRB)recommendation that the open space area be relocated to the vicinity of the southernmost 30'wide utility easement (between the 6-plex and the 4-plex). Noting that the DRB also recommended additional deciduous and coniferous plantings near the chain link fence along the southern property boundary, he stated that the application provides 51.2% open space. Mr. Skelton corrected an error in recommended subdivision condition#8, which implies that curb and gutter must be installed as part of Phase I on both sides of South 13th Avenue. It is the intention of the Development Review Committee, he said, that the applicant construct approximately the south 400 feet of South 13th Avenue to a 37 foot paved width with City standard curb, gutter and boulevard sidewalk on the west side, and a rolled asphalt curb on the east side, with no gutter or boulevard. The remaining length of West Babcock Street with Phase I will be constructed to a paved twenty-four foot wide street with sidewalk on the west side and a rolled asphalt curb on the east side. During Phase II construction,the remaining north portion of South 13th Avenue will be improved to a full City standard street of 37 feet with curb, gutter and boulevard sidewalk on the west side. Lonny Walker questioned whether provisions are built in for Phase II street improvements if the property owner to the east does not develop his property within two years. Planner Skelton responded that Phase II street improvements are dependent upon the marketability of the Phase II units. Mr. Walker confirmed with Planner Skelton that in order to complete more than 10 units, the applicant would have to make the necessary street improvements. He does not know, however, whether the road will be built to a full standard 2, 5, or 10 years from now. City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 3 ORELIMM Responding to Dick McConnen, Planner Skelton suggested the Board consider the 6-plex in relation to PUD open space requirements that would not apply if the applicant proposed a 5- plex. He added that the number of units might not make much of a difference in terms of mass and viewsheds. Lowell Springer, applicant's architect, commented that Don Bockhahn has been working hard to find a way to get 13th Avenue through to continue the grid pattern of the transportation system. All of the comments from the neighbors, he added,have been positive. Don Bockhahn, applicant,indicated that although he introduced development plans for the property to the neighbors five years ago, the project has undergone a series of design changes. Upon revisiting the neighbors with this design, he said that most were receptive to the proposal and relieved that improvements might be made to the trailer court property. President Devitt OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING. After three calls for public testimony, and hearing none, he CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING. MOTION- Lonny Walker moved, seconded by Sandra Smiley, to recommend approval of Planning Application#P-9716 with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report and condition#8 amended to clarify its intent. The motion carried 9-0, forwarding a unanimous recommendation of approval to the City Commission for its consideration at the 3:00 p.m.meeting on Monday, June 2, 1997. Calling attention to recommended zoning condition#8, Planner Skelton reviewed the zoning PUD application. In response to Dick McConnen, Don Bockhahn stated that the adjoining property owner to the west has agreed to relocate the existing mailboxes and dumpster outside of the proposed public street and utility easement for the extension of South 13th Avenue as specified in recommended condition#12. Noting the utility easements across the subject property, Lowell Springer commented that the that the open space relocation would work out well; however he suggested the 6-plex be allowed to maintain at least a 15 foot setback from southern property line. He stated that the property owner to the east has agreed to the language in the public street and utility easement document and has verbally agreed to sign it. The development team indicated that in negotiating with this property owner, they have agreed to install the water and sewer laterals, as well as platted lots for the future development of his property. Commenting that a more central location of the open space makes more sense, Michael Vincent questioned how the applicant feels about relocating the open space. Lowell Springer replied that the only concern is that the plan has been presented as submitted to the neighbors. . City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 4 awl P L I Ah HNA RY President Devitt questioned how far the residence immediately south is from the property line. Lowell Springer responded that the house is approximately 11 feet from the property line. President Devitt weighed impacts to the neighbor immediately south of the property against providing a more centralized open space area to the residents of the development. He expressed concern that the neighbor to the south might feel differently about a reduced setback. Planner Skelton noted that the minimum side yard setback in the zoning district is 8 feet. He suggested the applicant propose a 15 foot setback to the southernmost neighbor, and that the Board provide some flexibility in terms of establishing a definitive setback. Agreeing that a more central open space location would benefit the residents of the development,Dick McConnen suggested that it would also would break up the expanse of street. Clark Babcock offered his support of requiring a minimum of a 15 foot setback from the southern property line to the 6-plex and relocating the open space. Responding to John Mandeville, Lowell Springer remarked that the applicant is in agreement with the recommended conditions of approval if some flexibility is provided in zoning PUD condition#8 to allow a 15 foot setback from the southern property line. Don Bockhahn commended Planner Skelton for his patience and direction throughout the five year process of the development design. He thanked the Board for its consideration. MOTION- Lonny Walker moved, seconded by Sandra Smiley,to recommend approval of Zoning Application#Z-9726 with the conditions outlined in the Staff Report and an amendment to condition#8 to allow a minimum of 15 feet setback from the 6-plex to the southern property line. The motion carried 9-0, forwarding a unanimous recommendation of approval to the City Commission for its consideration at the 3:00 p.m. meeting on Monday, June 2, 1997. Responding to Lonny Walker, Don Bockhahn indicated that although he originally hoped the units could be sold in the $75,000 range, they are now hoping to maintain$100,000.price range. ITEM 6. OLD BUSINESS - None ITEM 7. NEW BUSINESS -None ITEM 8. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT-None ITEM 9. PRESIDENT'S REPORT Bill Mitchell announced the Society of Wetlands conference to be held June 2nd through June 6th at MSU, and provided the Recording Secretary meeting and registration information to City-County Planning Board-May 20, 1997 5 I i BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE STAFF REPORT ----------------------------------------------------------------- ITEM: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. P-9716 -- AN APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW OF CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO DEVELOP NINETEEN TOWNHOUSE LOTS ON PROPERTY ZONED "R-3", RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM-DENSITY DISTRICT ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z-9726 -- AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES AS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW ONE OF FOUR TOWNHOUSE STRUCTURE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DENSITY OF FIVE DWELLING UNITS PER TOWNHOUSE STRUCTURE IN THE "R-3", RESIDENTIAL,MEDIUM-DENSITY DISTRICT APPLICANT: LOWELL SPRINGER,FOR DON BOCKHAHN SPRINGER GROUP ARCHITECTS 1500 MTN. GOAT ROAD 201 SOUTH WALLACE AVENUE BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 BOZEMAN,MT. 59715 DATE/TIME: BEFORE THE BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ON TUESDAY, MAY 6, 1997, AT 7:00 P.M., AND BEFORE THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION ON MONDAY,MAY 19, 1997,AT 3:00 P.M., BOTH IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL,411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN,MONTANA REPORT BY: DAVE SKELTON, SENIOR PLANNER BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL ---------------------------------------------------- Location/Description: The property in question is described as being a tract of land located in the East One-Half of the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 12, T2S,RSE,P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, and is approximately 1.91 acres in size. It is more commonly located at 1304-1312 West Babcock Street and is situated immediately east of Heritage Condominiums. Please refer to the vicinity map provided on the following page. Babcock .,Street Subject ��� / ]'Yoperty a ,North r I x i Proposal: The applicant, Mr. Don Bockhahn, is proposing to subdivide 1.91 acres of vacant, undeveloped land into nineteen(19)townhouse residential lots. The residential subdivision involves the construction of four townhouse structures consisting of four to six dwelling units per townhouse cluster with each unit containing approximately 1,150 sq. ft. and a single-car attached garage. The project is anticipated to developed as a two phase P.U.D. development with a tentative buildout date of three to five years. Development of the project will require the construction of South 13th Avenue as a full City standard street from its current location south of the subject property to the intersection with West Babcock Street. The exterior treatment of the townhouse structures will consist of horizontal color-lok siding with a 6-inch exposure and architectural asphalt shingles on 4-in-12 pitched gable roofs. No color palete for the development has been specified; however, the developer has suggested the use of neutral colors with accent colors at the corner trim and entryways to each unit. Background: The project design provided in the application for a Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat Review is the result of two informal reviews and a concept P.U.D. plan review with the Development Review Committee (D.R.C.) and Design Review Board (D.R.B.) beginning in December 1992. The current design contained in this application is the third generation of a residential development that has been reduced from twenty-two (22)to nineteen(19)dwellings units in order to address the issues identified by the D.R.C. and D.R.B. during the preliminary reviews between December 1992 and March 1993. Provided in the developers application is a written narrative that contains the written comments provided by the D.R.C. and D.R.B. during their informal reviews. The proposal to develop the subject property in 1992-93 involved a residential, single-family development containing a mix of one-story and two-story dwelling units that focused on a private interior street with a deadend cul-de-sac and minimal pedestrian circulation, on-street parking, open space and streetscape (see attached copy of the 1993 plan - Attachment "A-1" thru "A-3"). A summary review of the D.R.C. and D.R.B. comments provided in 1992-93 involved the following j basic issues: 1. The need for additional open space and landscape areas, and larger rear yards for the single family dwellings that do not encroach into the rear yard. 2. The need for adequate pedestrian circulation both on-site and with tie adjacent neighborhoods. 3. The need for adequate on-street parking and boulevard sidewalks, as well as a secondary and/or emergency access. 4. A greater emphasis on the urban streetscape,widow treatment, architectural detail and covered porches. Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning_ The adjacent lands uses and zoning in the immediate area of the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Subdivision Plat are: North - West Babcock Street and partially developed land zoned "B-2", Community Highway District; South - Developed residential land zoned'R-3",Residential-Medium Density District; East - Developed mobile home park, Eldridge Court, zoned "R-3", Residential- Medium Density District; and West - Developed residential land, Heritage Condominiums, zoned "R-3", Residential-Medium Density District. The 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update designates the area in question to develop as Urban Residential Infill. These areas are undeveloped areas currently inside the existing City limits where residential development at urban densities is appropriate;primarily,these areas will develop at a single family density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre;where multi-family residential development (6-15 dwelling units per acre)may be appropriate under certain conditions. The criteria for multi- family development is set forth on page 57 of the Bozeman Master Plan. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. P-9716 PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW OF CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES,A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO DEVELOP NINETEEN TOWNHOUSE LOTS Staff Findings: The Bozeman City-County Planning Office and other applicable review agencies has evaluated the application for Preliminary Plat Review of Carson Place Townhouses, including the Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement provided in the application. As required by Section 16.08.040. B of the subdivision regulations, a copy of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat application was distributed to all appropriate agencies for review and comment, and those agency comments received by the Planning Office have been included in the staff summary report. Review the proposed subdivision was evaluated against the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update, Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations and the public interest criteria established by the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Surface Water No streams, stream/ditches or irrigation ditches have been identified on said property. As a result,no floodplain or floodways have been identified on said property. Groundwater The applicant indicates that depth to groundwater is approximately 6-6". Seasonal highwater tables prepared by the Natural Resource Conservation Service indicate seasonal groundwater to be greater than ten(10)feet. No active wells appear to currently be in the area and no private wells for domestic services or landscape irrigation are proposed with this application. Geology, Soils, Slopes The geology of this site is tertiary strata, predominantly fluviatile deposits. The applicant notes that the subject property is part of a high bench-like fringe of alluvial fan and stream channel deposits that skirt the Bridger and Gallatin Ranges. There are no known geologic hazards associated with the site, other than is inclusion within the Seismic Zone 3. The soils at this site are primarily Silty Loam series occurring over most of the site with a groundwater depth of 6'-6" and overall soil depth of six feet to gravely strata. The silt loam is relatively stable having generally low strength,moderate shrink-well potential and slow permability. .:�4�:::: :� ....�� �......�::........Ate....................... The applicant indicates in his narrative that there is no significant slope or topography features other than a natural swale down the center of the property from south to north, and a general planar tilt to the north. There are no rock outcrops or slopes greater than 15%, with topography generally not exceeding a slope of 1-5% across the property. Vegetation The site is undeveloped land containing native grasses that are used for limited livestock pasture and does not contain any evidence of noxious weeds being present. No mature vegetation and/or trees exist on the site with exception to the vegetation at the extreme north end of the property and a mature hedge along the west and south property lines. The applicant indicates that there are no known endangered or threatened flora on the site. ` Wildlife Due to the sites orientation to West Babcock Street and proximity to commercial development along West Main Street, and the urban development that has occurred on all four sides of the subject property,the applicant notes that there is no seasonal or transient wildlife use by white- tail deer, coyote, fox, or migrant birds in this area. It is not winter range for big game species, and three is no wildlife habitat, food or nesting cover for large birds. Historical Features Although the subject property does contain an older single family residence, which includes three accessory structures on the north half of the property,the Planning Office is not aware of any cultural and/or historical features on said property. Visual Impact The development proposed with this Preliminary Plat application will allow for the development of nineteen(19)townhouse lots at a density of 9.94 dwelling units per acre,which will not exceed the maximum allowable density prescribed in the Bozeman Area Master Plan and Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The proposed land use is a compatible and logical residential pattern for property zoned "R-3", Residential, Medium Density District, which also serves as a buffer between different residential land use patterns(condominiums and manufactured homes), as well as single family residential dwellings to the south from commercial development along West Babcock Street and West Main Street. COMMUNITY IMPACT Water Supply and Sewage Disposal S Municipal infrastructure (i.e., water and sanitary sewer) is available in the area of the proposed townhouse development. However, the developer will be required to extend water and sanitary sewer mains to the subject property within the general area of the future South 13th Avenue right-of-way extension to West Babcock Street. The water main extension will provide.a "looped" municipal water system for adequate fire protection facilities during Phase I of the development, which will include the location of fire hydrants along the new South 13th Avenue extension to West Babcock Street. The Superintendent of Water/Sewer did emphasize during Preliminary Plat review the importance of locating water and sewer main extensions in the proper location within the South 13th Avenue right-of-way. The preliminary plan submitted for review does not indicate the proper location. This will also apply to the location of service stubs to each individual townhouse lot. Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste service for the proposed townhouse development will be provided by Three Rivers Disposal, Customized Services or City of Bozeman with disposal at the City of Bozeman landfill. The landfill is presently approved by and meets the requirements of the State Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. Roads Pubic access to Carson Place Townhouses will require the extension of South 13th Avenue, as a full City standard street, from the south boundary of the site to its intersection with West Babcock Street. This proposal is an alternative proposed by the developer as a result of preliminary reviews by the Development Review Committee,in-lieu of an interior private street with no on-street parking or sidewalks. The applicant has requested to develop the 19-lot townhouse project as a planned unit development(P.U.D.)in order to phase the improvements to the street, whereby the developer will establish the necessary provisions to extend South 13th Avenue to the intersection with West Babcock Street as a full City standard street(37 feet back-of-curb with curb, gutter and boulevard sidewalks). However,of the required sixty(60) foot right-of-way necessary to construct South 13th Avenue only twelve (12) feet is located on the developers property with the remaining forty-eight (48) feet situated on the adjacent property owners land to the east. This will required the applicant to obtain a forty-eight(48)foot wide "public street and utility easement" from the adjacent property for the public street improvements. With Phase I of the townhouse development the applicant will construct approximately the south four hundred (400) feet of South 13th Avenue to a 37-foot paved width with City standard curb,gutter and boulevard sidewalk on the west side, and a rolled asphalt curb on the east side, with no gutter or boulevard sidewalk. This will avoid the problem of needed curb cuts and demolition of sidewalks in the future should the adjacent property choose to redevelop their property. The remaining length of West Babcock Street with Phase I will be constructed to a paved twenty-four (24)foot wide street with sidewalk on the west side and a rolled asphalt curb on the east side. During Phase II construction, the remaining north portion of South 13th Avenue will be improved to a full City standard street width of thirty-seven(37)feet with curb, gutter and boulevard sidewalk on the west side. Utilities Copies of the preliminary subdivision plat were distributed to the various utility agencies for review and written comment. With exception to the comments provided by U.S. West Communications in the applicant's submittal,the Planning Office has not received any oral or written comments from the other utility agencies. The applicant notes that all utilities will be installed underground along the rear of the townhouse units within a fifteen(15) foot wide utility easement. However, Section 16.12.050 of the subdivision regulations requires a minimum twenty (20) foot wide utility easement,unless the applicant can provide written documentation from all of the utility agencies that a fifteen(15) foot wide easement is sufficient. Fencing of Agricultural Lands There are no adjacent agricultural lands to the proposed subdivision, as a result, the development will not disturb the fencing of any agricultural lands. Emergency Services Fire and police protection will be provided by the City of Bozeman and ambulance service by Medtrans of Montana.Ambulance Service. Schools The applicant notes that based on conversations with Gary Griffith,Bozeman School District, this development would contribute ten (10) school age children at full buildout (0.5 students per household). In order to address the needs of the school district, school officials have considered, along with City and County officials, a system of impact fees to fund needed improvements. At this point in time the impact fees structure imposed by the City does not address the costs of financial impacts to the school system as calculated by the applicant in his narrative. Land Use As noted previously the subject property is zoned "R-3", Residential, Medium Density District, which permits the development of townhouse residential lots. The proposed residential lots comply with the minimum lot size permitted in the "R-3" zone and the density of 9.94 dwelling units per acre comply maximum allowable density in the Bozeman Area Master Plan. As noted previously, the proposed townhouse development is considered by the Planning Office as a compatible land use with adjacent residential patterns in the immediate area. Housin Based on an average population of 3.2 persons per dwelling unit, the townhouse development would generate a population of approximately 61 residents at full buildout of both phases. As the project is anticipated to develop as an alternative affordable housing development the actual population may be somewhat higher assuming that younger families with children may be common to the subdivision. Park Land Each subdivision planned unit development shall provide an area for dedicated park land and/or open space appropriate in size to the proposed development and design. However, such area shall not be less than thirty (30)percent of the area of the P.U.D., exclusive of all dedications, or approximately 0.5179 acres(22,561 sq. ft.). In addition, fifty(50)percent of the required open space shall be of common ownership, or in this case 0.2589 acres(11,278 sq. ft.). The subdivision proposal as submitted to the Planning Office provides 11,696 sq. ft. (0.268 acres)of common open space and 30,870 sq. ft. (0.708 acres) for a total of 42,566 sq. ft. (0.977 acres), or 51.21% open space. Taxation The applicant calculates the projected value of each townhouse lot to be $90,000.00 each. Without development, the tract of land generated approximately $120.00 in taxes in 1993. The expected tax revenue,utilizing approximate mill levies, is $27,062.00 per year. This tax base does not address any impact fees or future S.I.D.'s that may be related to the townhouse development. Certificates The Final Plat for both phases shall comply with Section 16.10.030 of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations, including all appropriate certificates and language. A Certificate of Dedication must be provided on the Final Plat for dedication of public right-of-way for that portion of the South 13th Avenue right-of-way (approximately 12 ft.) that is situated on the applicant's property. A Certificate of Installation of Improvements must also be provided on the Final Plat for signature by the Director of Public Service. All references on the plat to Carson Place Townhouses must also include a reference to the development being a "planned unit development". As the developer will file a Final Plat for each of the two phases of the development, each plat must identify which phase is being filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. The Certificate of Dedication must also contain the appropriate legal description for each phase which describes the entire metes and bounds, and acreage for each of the two proposed subdivision phases. Protective Covenants The protective covenants for the homeowner's association must be amended to include provisions for permanent care and maintenance of common open space areas, landscape, streetscape, pathways,underground irrigation system and other commonly owned facilities, as well as provisions for snow removal. The covenants should also contain language that provides the association with the power to levy assessments for maintenance and upkeep of commons areas and facilities. The covenants included in the application shall be further amended to include the City of Bozeman as a party to any amendments to the protective covenants that specifically apply to the conditions of preliminary plat approval. The covenants must include a landscape plan exhibit that illustrates the landscape improvements for the townhouse development, including any recreational facilities, screening or fences required of preliminary plat approval. PUBLIC INTEREST CRITERIA The basis for the City Commission's decision on the Preliminary Plat application for Carson Place Townhouses shall be whether the preliminary plat, environmental assessment, community impact statement, Planning Board advice and recommendation, and additional information demonstrate that development of the subdivision would meet the requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act. The Planning Office provides the following summary review of the criteria given for consideration of a preliminary subdivision plat application pursuant to 76-3-608,M.C.A. 1. EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE The subject property is not part of an established agricultural farm and/or activity and would not be considered as good producing farmland. Therefore no impacts on good agriculture land exist with development of the subject property. 2. AGRICULTURAL WATER USER FACILITIES The applicant has not identified in the submittal any reference to existing irrigations ditches or downstream water rights and the Planning Office is not aware of any potential downstream water facilities that may be effect by the proposed subdivision. None the less, the applicant should provide a written narrative stating that the proposed subdivision will not interfere with any agricultural water user facility and that no irrigation ditches for downstream water rights currently exist on said property. 3. EFFECTS ON LOCAL SERVICES In order to develop the property at the urban densities described in the application, the applicant must extend municipal infrastructure to the subdivision at no cost to the community. The Bozeman Development Review Committee has recommended conditional approval with the necessary conditions of preliminary plat approval such that review and approval of all infrastructure improvements must be completed by the City Engineer's Office and Montana ........................................................................................................................... Department of Health and Environmental Sciences prior to Final Plat approval, 4. EFFECTS ON THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Based on the subject property's proximity to existing urban development on all four sides and the lack of significant physical and/or topographical features no effects on the natural environment have been identified. 5. EFFECTS ON WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT The lack of any physical features, mature vegetation, fisheries or riparian habitat limits the potential for any wildlife habitat or wildlife on said property. As a result,the Planning Office has not identified any significant wildlife or wildlife habitat with this preliminary plat application. 6. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY Extension of municipal infrastructure to the proposed townhouse subdivision should eliminate any potential impacts on the community. High groundwater, floodways, floodplains, wetlands or significant physical features are not common to the preliminary plat application Improvements to the area's transportation network system have been established by the Development Review Committee to mitigate any impacts from the additional traffic generated by the proposed subdivision. As of the witting of this report the Planning Office has been contacted by a number of residents in the area regarding the general concept of the proposed 19-lot townhouse subdivision as it relates to road improvements, density, screening and pedestrian circulation. However,no oral or written public testimony in opposition to the proposed subdivision has been received by the Planning Office as of this date. Development Review Committee Comments: The Bozeman Development Review Committee reviewed the application for Preliminary Plat review, and as a result, recommends conditional approval of the proposed 19-lot townhouse development with the conditions outlined at the end of this staff report. Staff Recommendation: The Bozeman City-County Planning Office, Development Review Committee and other applicable review agencies have reviewed the application for Preliminary Plat Review of Carson Place Townhouses, a Planned Unit Development, and as a result recommends conditional approval of the application with the conditions outlined below: Pursuant to Section 18.08.040.D of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations,the Planning �A Board shall review the preliminary plat and supplementary information to determine if the proposed plat meets the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations,the development standards and policies of the Bozeman Area Master Plan,the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, and other adopted state and local ordinances. The Board shall listen to public testimony as it relates to the subdivision,but not site plan development related issues,and shall review the subdivision in light of the review criteria established in the Subdivision and Platting Act. The Planning Board shall then make a recommendation to the Bozeman City Commission for approval, conditional approval, or disapproval of the subdivision, which includes the reasons therefore. Conditions may be established that must be satisfied before Final Plat approval can be granted to ensure that the subdivision complies with the above noted regulations. Enineering.: 1. A legend of all symbols and line types used shall be provided; 2. Storm Water Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan shall include grading information of sufficient detail that adequate drainage from the site to an approved destination may be verified. The plan shall also include sufficient spot elevations, typical stormwater retention basin details,basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within park or open space shall be designed and constructed so as to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Site Grading - A detailed Site Grading Plan shall be provided with the subdivision infrastructure improvement plans. The plan shall include existing contours, final contours, spot elevations after street and drainage improvements have been constructed and drainage flow arrows reflecting final developed lot grading. The plan must demonstrate that the final plat grading and final property grading will provide adequate drainage to an acceptable discharge point without adverse impacts to adjacent properties. Off-site drainage facilities and drainage easements or other rights of occupancy shall be provided where necessary for conveyance of drainage off site; 3. Plans and Specifications for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer facilities and the public street,prepared and signed by a Professional Engineer(PE)registered in the State of Montana, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for Construction Inspection, Post-Construction Certification, and preparation of mylar Record Drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been conducted; 4. All infrastructure improvements including 1)water and sewer main extensions, and 2)public streets, curb&gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space,rear yard frontages or other non- lot frontages and storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be installed and initially accepted by the City of Bozeman, or financially guaranteed(see Section 16.42.030 BMC), prior to filing of the final plat. The financial guarantee(s) shall be as stipulated in an improvements agreement between the owner and the City. Said agreement must be signed prior to filing the final plat. No building permits shall be issued prior to completion and City acceptance of the water and sewer infrastructure improvements; 5. The Montana Department of Fish,Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits(i.e. 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) obtained prior to FSP approval; 6. Applicant shall provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of SID's for the following: a. Street improvements to Babcock Street including paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage facilities. b. Street improvements to South l3th Avenue including paving, curb &gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage facilities; 7. The full extent of the improvements proposed for each phase of the development shall be clearly indicated on the preliminary plat. The water main shall be fully looped with phase I. Adequate storm drainage facilities must be provided for each phase; 8. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of the subject property with Phase I. City Standard concrete curb & gutter shall be installed as part of Phase I on both sides of South 13th in the area where it will be full width. The drive approaches shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach i.e. concrete apron, sidewalk section, and drop-curb; 9. The following dedications and/or easements shall be granted to the City of Bozeman: a. Prior to filing of the final plat; A utility and public street easement for the east 48 feet of South 13th Avenue. b. With the filing of the final plat; 1) Dedication of the 12 feet of South 13th Avenue located on the subject property. 2) Dedication of the 30 of West Babcock Street adjacent to and north of the subject property; ........................................................................................................................... It shall be made clear that no open space is to be located in any public Right of Way. 10. The phased construction of South 13th Avenue must be completely and adequately defined prior to initiation of any construction. South 13th Avenue shall be paved throughout with Phase I. With Phase I, the south = 400 feet shall be constructed to a City Standard 37 feet width,back of curb to back of curb and the north z 240 feet shall be 24 feet wide. In the area where the street is less than standard width, suitable temporary curbing shall be provided on the east side of South 13th. Provisions for responsibility for maintenance of said temporary curb shall be the developers. Also in the area where South 13th is less than standard width, City Standard'No Parking" signs shall be placed on both sides of the street. The number and format of the signs shall be coordinated with the City Sign Department. Prior to construction of Phase II,the north 240 feet of South 13th shall be completely reconstructed to a width of 37 feet,back of curb to back of curb. The north most = 195 feet of curb on the west side of South 13th shall be realigned to City Standard location, 11 Meet off property line, with phase II. South 13th Avenue on the subject property shall be aligned with South 13th Avenue immediately to the south. Water and sewer infrastructure shall be in the standard City locations; 11. Typical curb details,typical asphalt paving section detail and right and left curb line profiles for all phases shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer; Superintendent of Street/Sanitation: 12. Until South 13th Avenue is built to a full City standard street all the way to West Babcock Street the City Street Department will not be providing snow plowing services; 13. The applicant shall address storm drainage for Phase I at the corner of South 13th Avenue and West Babcock Street. A plan for the storm drainage system including intakes and piping shall be approved by the City Engineer's Office prior to final site plan approval; 14. All asphalt sections for Phase I &II shall be approved by the City Engineer's Office prior to final site plan approval; Superintendent of Water/Sewer: 15. The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and easements shall be clearly depicted, as well as nearby fire hydrants and proposed fire hydrants. The existing main location as drawn on South 13th does not appear to be correct; 16. Sewer and water services as shown are not acceptable. Location of stubs will be reviewed during plan review; h P I•17. Water main will require full loop from Babcock to existing main in South 13t with hale , q p g 18. No structures will be permitted in the sewer easement; 19. All weather roadway and access easements will be required to all manholes; 20. Project infrastructure phasing,including all utility and street planting, shall be clearly defined. Water main and services will not be permitted to be installed in phases; Planning.Office: 21. That the protective covenants for the home owner's association be amended to address issues pertaining to assessment and maintenance of common open space,landscape areas, streetscape, snow removal, sidewalks,retention ponds, outside storage areas, fences, etc., for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Plat approval; 22. That the applicant consider the design of a stormwater drainage runoff plan that establishes multiple retention ponds in the common open space areas,in-lieu of one large retention pond along West Babcock Street, and that all retention ponds will not have a side slope to exceed 1:4 with a maximum depth of not more than one(1)in depth, and that it be noted accordingly on a site drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer's Office prior to Final Plat approval; 23. That all references to "Carson Place Townhouse Subdivision" must include reference to the development being a "planned unit development"; 24. That the Final Plat shall comply with Section 16.10.030 of the Bozeman Area Subdivision Regulations, and shall include all appropriate documents, certificates, and be accompanied by all appropriate documents,including a Platting Certificate. Two mylar and two clothback copies of the Final Plat must be submitted for Final Plat approval, along with a digital copy of the Final Plat, on a double sided,high density 3 1/2" floppy disk; 25. That the developer shall have three (3)years from the date of Preliminary Plat approval to complete the conditions of preliminary plat approval and apply for Final Plat approval for Phase I and Phase II; and 26. That the applicant submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval of Carson Place Townhouses a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of Preliminary Plat approval has been satisfactorily addressed. AS THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICAITON A FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE PLANNING BOARD SHALL BE FORWARDED TO THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION WHO WILL MAKE THE DECISION ON THIS MATER AT A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR 3:00 P.M.,MONDAY,MAY 19, 1997. t # oils ZONING APPLICATION NO. Z-9726 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CARSON PLACE TOWNHOUSES, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DENSITY OF FIVE DWELLING UNITS PER TOWNHOUSE STRUCTURE IN THE "R 3",RESIDENTIAL,MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT Staff Findings: The Bozeman City-County Planning Office and other applicable review agencies have evaluated the application for a Conditional Use Permit, to develop Carson Place Townhouses as a nineteen unit zoning Planned Unit Development, which includes the construction of one townhouse structure containing six dwelling units and exceeding the maximum density of five dwelling units per townhouse structure in the "R-3",Residential, Mediumn Density District. The application was evaluated against the criteria set forth in Section 18.53.030 and 18.54.100 of the Zoning Ordinance. Provided below is a written summary-review containing comments from the Development Review Committee, Design Review Board and other applicable review agencies. SECTION 18.53.030 - CITY COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AND FINDINGS. 1. THAT THE SITE FOR THE PROPOSED USE IS ADEQUATE IN SIZE AND TOPOGRAPHY TO ACCOMMODATE SUCH USE,AND ALL YARDS, SPACES,WALLS AND FENCES, PARKING, LOADING AND LANDSCAPING ARE ADEQUATE TO PROPERLY RELATE SUCH USE WITH THE LAND AND USES IN THE VICINITY. As noted previously,the applicant has designed a townhouse project that evolved over a five year review process to address the preliminary concerns identified by the Development Review Committee and Design Review Board. With this application the developer has addressed the issues related to yard setbacks whereby variances to the Zoning Ordinance are no longer necessary. The site plan should be revised to confirm that the streetscape along South 13th Avenue will contain a regular spacing of boulevard trees to the extreme south end of the subject property. Additional landscape, containing a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees, is recommended within the common open space at the south end of the site. The property in questions presently contains a mix of fencing and mature vegetation along the south and west property boundaries,which provides some screening from adjacent property owners. However, the applicant should consider installation of a hedge along the south property line that would screen the single family residence to the south from the townhouse development and a fence along the north half of the property that is similar in design to the existing fence adjacent to Heritage Condominiums. C. .......................................................................................................................... 2. THAT THE SITE FOR THE PROPOSED USE RELATES TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ADEQUATE IN WIDTH AND PAVEMENT TYPE TO CARRY THE QUANTITY AND HIND OF TRAFFIC GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED USE. The page six of this staff report notes that the applicant proposes to improve the area's transportation system by extending South 13th Avenue to the intersection with West Babcock Street. South 13th Avenue is currently a dead-end street which contains no turn around capability for the general public or emergency services. Although the street may function as a private street for the 200-300 block residents it is a public right-of-way with a street currently designed with the intent of extending it north to West Babcock Street. The Development Review Committee found this proposal to a be a superior design from the previous proposal by the applicant to develop a private interior street with no on-street parking or sidewalks. The Planning Office calculated the potential traffic generated by the townhouse development based on the traffic manual Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 5th Edition, and as a resulted determined that the proposed townhouse development would generate approximately 5.86 average daily trips(A.D.T.)per dwelling unit, or 111 trips per day for the development. This is in comparison to 9.55 average daily trips per single-family detached dwelling unit. Based on the improvements required to South 13th Avenue, the D.R.C.has determined that the developer has mitigated any traffic impacts generated by the development. 3. THAT THE PROPOSED USE WILL HAVE NO ADVERSE EFFECT UPON THE ABUTTING PROPERTY. The proposed use is located in an area containing a mix of residential land uses ranging from manufactured homes to condominiums and single family dwellings. The proposed townhouse development would serve as a buffer or transition between a variety of different residential land uses, to include commercial development to the north. Development of South 13th Avenue would substantially improve the streetscape of the neighborhood and provide an adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation system to the north, as well as the shopping district along West Main Street. Additional landscape is recommended along the south property line to increase the buffering from the existing single family residential dwellings. The adjacent property to the east currently uses the future South 13th Avenue extension to locate the garbage refuse area and mail boxes for the mobile home park. In order for the improvements to South 13th Avenue to occur the developer will need to make arrangements with the adjacent property owner to relocate the garbage refuse area and mail boxes out of the public street and utility easement for the future street. 6 4. THAT THE PROPOSED USE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE BOZEMAN AREA MASTER PLAN. The Land Use Plan Element of the 1990 Bozeman Area Master Plan Update designates the subject property to develop as Residential Infill. These areas are located with the City limits where residential development at urban densities is appropriate; primarily, these areas will develop at single family densities of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre; multi-family residential development at a density of 6 to 15 dwelling units per acre may be appropriate when satisfying criteria set forth in the Master Plan(see page 57 of Bozeman Area Master Plan). Densities in excess of 15 dwelling units per acre may be allowed with a density bonus of 3 3% when a proposed project exceeds established design standards for the development. The density must be compatible with adjacent neighborhood development; building height, footprint configurations, superior site planning, landscape and buffering requirements must be incorporated to ensure compatibility with adjacent development. The proposed townhouse project would develop at a density of 9.96 units per acre, which does not exceed the maximum allowable density of 15 units per acre, or 28 multi-family units. With a density bonus of 33%up to 33 multi-family dwelling units could be permitted. Based on the density permitted in the Master Plan, eleven(11) single family dwellings units could be developed on said property. As a result, the application for a Conditional Use Permit is in conformance with the Bozeman Area Master Plan. 5. THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE HAS COMPLIED WITH ALL CONDITIONS STIPULATED IN CHAPTER 18.50. The Planning Office has reviewed the application against the criteria set forth in Chapter 18.50, and as a result has found the proposed townhouse development to comply with the regulatory standards set forth. 6. THAT ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS STATED IN THE APPROVAL ARE DEEMED NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE. The Design Review Board(%R.B.)reviewed the application commented that the common open space located at the south end of the project would serve the residents of the townhouse development more effectively if the open space was located within the interior of the project. By locating the common open space to the north of the six-unit townhouse structure, instead of the south, a larger open area would be provided as it would be situated next a thirty (30) foot wide utility easement. The D.R.B. also discussed the reduction in density from the first proposal, variation in building facade,orientation of garages,pedestrain trail and color palette. After reviewing the application the D.R.B. voted 6-0 to recommend approval with the following conditions: ........................................................................................................................... • • The Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit to develop nineteen townhouse units, and as a result determined that the location of the open space areas and proposed trailways were adequate. No additional comments and/or conditions of approval were recommended by the Board. SECTION 18.54.100 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA. The applicant has submitted with the application a written document which responds to the design objectives and criteria set forth in Section 18.54.100, specifically Criteria #1 - All Development Criteria and Criteria#2 -Residential Criteria. Based on the applicant's response and the Planning Staff s review of the application against said criteria,the application for a Conditional Use Permit would appear to comply with the applicable criteria with the conditions of approval recommended by the D.R.C. and D.R.B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Bozeman Development Review Committee, Bozeman Design Review Board,Planning Office and other applicable review agencies have reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit to develop Carson Place Townhouses as a zoning planned unit development, and as a result recommends conditional approval with the following attached conditions: 1. That the applicant provide additional landscape in the common open space areas that contains a mix of coniferous and deciduous trees for review and approval by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; 2. That the boulevard streetscape be continued to the south boundary of said property and that the applicant ensure that the location of the sanitary sewer and water service lines will not conflict with the formal arrangement of boulevard trees along South 13th Avenue, and that the site plan be revised accordingly prior to Final Site Plan approval; 3. That the applicant provide a screening device along adjacent residential properties that is consistent and/or compatible with existing fencing constructed by adjacent properties and that a typical screening detail be provided prior to Final Site Plan approval; 4. That the applicant provide a typical detail on the site plan verifying the construction of a patio area at the rear of each townhouse unit that also includes the screening device proposed between each unit, if any, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 5. That the applicant construct covered entryways on each of the townhouse units facing onto South 13th Avenue using two different entryway elevations, and that a typical detail be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; J-a V • • 6. That yardlights be installed along the street frontage of South 13th Avenue and that a typical detail and location of the fixtures be provided on the site plan for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 7. That the applicant provide a typical color palette for the townhouse development that is also verified on the exterior building elevations, which discourages the use of bright,obtrusive colors, for review and approval prior to Final Site Plan approval; 8. That the applicant relocate the common open space area located at the south end of the subject property to north of the six-unit townhouse structure such that it is located adjacent to the thirty(30)foot wide utility easement, and that it be noted accordingly on the landscape site plan prior to Final Site Plan approval; 9. That the applicant confirm on the landscape site plan that the location of water and sanitary sewer service stubs will not conflict with the location of the boulevard streetscape trees along South 13th Avenue, and that it be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to Final Site Plan approval; 10. That the applicant obtain a Building Permit within one (1)year of receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness and Major Site Plan Review approval, and prior to proceeding with construction of the project; 11. A boulevard planting detail shall be provided and must comply with the Engineering Department standards. Root barrier material should be used. No plantings shall be allowed in the typical sidewalk location; 12. That the applicant submit to the Planning Office documentation of an agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east to relocate the garbage refuse area and mailboxes for the mobile home park to another location on said property, or that the applicant provide another alternative to relocate said structures outside of the public street and utility easement for the extension of South 13th Avenue to West Babcock Street,prior to Final Site Plan approval; 13 That eight (8) conies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the Bozeman City-County Planning Board shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six(6)months of the date of Planning Board approval. A copy of the approved Final Site Plan shall be forwarded to the Building, Street/Sanitation, Water/Sewer, Engineering, and Fire Departments by the Planning Office; and one copy shall be retained in the Planning Office file; 14 That the applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement; 15 That a Buildine Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one 2S4i ....4 ............:::.......................................... year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED; 16 If occupancy of any structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months; however, all on-site improvements shall be completed by the applicant within nine (9)months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security; and 17 That the applicant upon submitting the Final Site Plan for approval by the Planning Director and prior to issuance of a building permit shall submit a written narrative outlining how each of the above conditions of approval have been satisfied. AS THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A ZONING P.U.D. THE PLANNING BOARD SHALL MAKE A FORMAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION WHO WILL MAKE THE DECISION ON THIS MATTER AT A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, MAY 19, 1997, AT 3:OOPM. Attachments: Preliminary Plat Application Conditional Use Permit Application cc: Don Bockhahn, Applicant Lowell Springer, Springer Group Architects 0 • Sylvia Miller • ��1� 1232 W. Babcock #7 Bozeman, Mt. 59715 4/23/' 97 RECEIVED SY Bozeman City-County Planning Office I P.O. Box 640 CITY-C�'"�!T`l Mi�i�7� Bozeman, Mt. 59771 -0640 TO Whom It May Concern: I guess I 'm about to show my ignorance,but I would like to know what affect the impact is going to have that the townhouses that will proably be built on 1304 W. Babcock, how it was going to affect the moblir home. park?????????? I own my cwn mobile home, but court is. owned by some- one living in California and is being managed by a local property management. According to the "lease" "we" have with the owner if we want to sell our mobiles , we ' re sopZose to give the owner of the court the first option to buyor if we don ' t take his offer,wecould sell it to some one else andhtigeyay have to move it. Is this considered Blockbusting?Would I have the right to file a greviance with the Fair Housing and equal- opport- tunity ?????? I would like to hear from you. I would also like to know if this going to be one of these affordable housing programs ? . I don't understand what you people define as affordable or why you would need to speed $8,000 .00 to do such a study. Sincerely, Sylvia Miller :TThe Chillreon's Hospital Kids Need A Kids'Hospital Cardiac Care Center 1056 East 19th Avenue Denver,Colorado 80218 May 6, 1997 Mark M. Boucek, MID Chief,Pediatric Cardiology Professor of Pediatrics Bozeman City-County Planning Office David R.Clarke, MD 35 North Bozeman Avenue Chief,Pediatric Cardiothoracic P.O. Box 640 Surgery Bozeman,MT 59771-0640 Professor of Surgery Jenne Poll, MBA RE: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Planned Administrator Unit Development and a Preliminary Subdivision Plat Pediatric Cardiology-Box 100 Application for Carson Place Townhouses (303)861-6820 (303)837.2S9S(FAX) To Whom It May Concern: Curt DeGroff, MD Instructor of Pediatrics As an adjacent homeowner, I would like to make the following comments. D.Dunbar Ivy, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics 1. That no access be permitted from Pioneer Drive. Bill Pietro,MID Assistant Professor of Pediatrics 2. The structure not be more than two stories in height, blocking the view of the Michael S.Schaffer,MD current townhouses. Associate Professor of Pediatrics Elizabeth M.Shaffer,MD 3. The five dwelling per structure rule not be expanded to six or more. Associate Professor of Pediatrics Robin Shandas,PhD . Sincerely, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Henry M.Sondhelmer,MD Professor of Pediatrics Lilliam M.Valdes-Cruz, MD Robert R. Wo D. Professor of Pediatrics Professor of Pediatrics James W.Wiggins,Jr., MD Section of Cardiology Professor of Pediatrics Robert R.Wolfe, MD RRW/cs Professor of Pediatrics Heidi Bicknell, FIN Transplant Coordinator Mary Luna, FIN Transplant Coordinator Marilyn Day, MS,RD Nutritionist Pediatric Cardlothoracic Surgery-Box 200 (303)861-6660 (303)764-8022(FAX) David N.Campbell,MD Professor of Surgery Esther Carpenter, FIN Cardiac Nurse Clinician Affiliated with rr--zk QU University of Colorado Health Sciences Center building and decide what is best for the whole building. Ms. Katz noted that she doesn't agree with what has been said thus far. She noted that she felt the proposal is adequate and emphasizing the entrance more would indicate more cost inside. Mr. Cruwys concurred with Ms. Katz. He noted that if the mechanical equipment isn't visible, then don't screen it. If it isn't obtrusive, let it be. He concurred that something has to be done in the future about repainting the other facades. Mr. Willett noted that screening from the front is not necessary. He noted that when one is in the vicinity of the building,one doesn't see the mechanical equipment. He noted that the simplicity of the front facade can be inviting,yet emphasized. Chairperson Chisholm noted frustration with the roof top screening requirement of the Code. He asked for the distance from the sidewalk to the lowest section of the canopy. Mr. O'Leary noted the distance is ten feet. Chairperson Chisholm suggested some wall mounted light fixtures to emphasize the entrance. Ms. Katz noted that the vertical elements would to the interest of the entrance. She asked if there had been any consideration for the size of the mechanical equipment in comparison to the size of the building. Planning Director Epple explained the Code requirement. He then asked Mr. O'Leary if he wished to return to DRB with another rendering. Mr. O'Leary noted that he could, however,he planned to draw the building permits the early part of May. Mr. O'Leary noted that the main problem seems to be the lack of pattern along the front facade. Chairperson Chisholm noted that some embellishment of the front facade should be added to emphasize the entrance. Mr. Cruwys suggested that Staff review the rendering and not bring the application back to DRB. MOTION: Mr. Gleye moved, Mr. Cruwys seconded, that the application be conditionally approved subject to the applicant changing the entrance to a more welcoming statement subject to the review and approval of Staff, and secondly, that the rest of the building be required to be repainted to match the front facade within four years, with the understanding that there will be some wrap around of the front facade at this time. The motion carried 6 - 0. B. (`Carson Place`Townhouses Zonin and Subdivision P_UD's#Z-972_6)&#P-9716 - 1304 West Babcock Street (Skelton) - A Zoning and Subdivision Planned Unit Development to allow a 19-unit townhouse complex with one townhouse building of six units. Don Bockhahn, Lowell Springer, and Gene Mickolio joined DRC. Senior Planner Dave Skelton reviewed the project, noting that this has been a five year project. He also noted the reason that this is a PUD is because a recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning Board on scale and land use. He reviewed the background on subdivision PUD's and described the developments in Design Review Board Minutes-April 22,1997 4 i this neighborhood. He referred to four key concepts from the DRB in the 1992 Informal Review. He continued stating that the applicant is striving to keep the cost of each unit under$100,000. Staff recommended eight conditions(the Staff Report is on file in the Planning Office). He then noted that the eighth condition doesn't apply. Chairperson Chisholm asked how many units were proposed in the original proposal. Planner Skelton noted that 22 were proposed with 19 in the current proposal. Mr. Cruwys inquired as to why there were six units in the one structure. Planner Skelton explained that clustered townhouse units up to five units per structure are allowed in the R-3 zoning district,while sux-plexes and apartments are permitted are in an R-4 zoning district. Mr. Gleye asked about deviations for this project. Planner Skelton noted that the PUD process relaxes the subdivision regulations to allow for a six-unit townhouse structure and street standards different from a full City Standard Street. Chairperson Chisholm asked the applicant to respond to the conditions. Mr. Springer noted that the conditions are not new as they have developed over the years. He noted that they are solving that problem with the property to the east. They are also hoping to put economic pressure on them to improve their property. He reviewed the agreement that Mr. Bockhahn made with his neighbor to the east. Mr. Gleye asked for the dimensions of the lot. Planner Skelton gave them. Mr. Gleye noted that this is an incredibly difficult lot to develop. He continued that he agrees with Staff s conditions, however,he was concerned with malting some variation in the front facades of the buildings. Mr. Springer noted that with color variations and different treatments, there will be interest added. Mr. Willett asked which material is correct-the plot plan or the elevations. Planner Skelton noted that the elevations are old, the plot plans are correct. Ms. Katz commented that her concern with the elevations is that the garage is the focus of the front facades. She felt the entrances need to be more clearly articulated. Mr. Cruwys noted that the pedestrian walkway is rather different and asked if it was intended to be two easements. Mr. Springer noted that there are two easements, which have to be located where they are due to the layout of the lot, and the applicant would like to continue the walkway to connect with the walkway to the south. Discussion ensued on the extension of South 13th Street, changing the location of the open space, and the location of hedges and fences. Mr. Cruwys noted that it may be beneficial to move the six-plex to give more space for the trail system. He recommended the applicant talk to his neighbors to gain their input about having the trail/open space wider between the two subdivisions. Mr. Gleye concurred. He noted that if the six-plex were moved as far south as the setbacks allow,then there would be more usable space to the north. MOTION: Mr. Willett moved, Mr.Noonan seconded, to approve the application with Staff conditions, adding a condition to move the six-plex as far south as possible. MOTION: Chairperson Chisholm moved to amend the motion to modify condition#5 that at least two different entryway elevations to be used to embellish the front facades. The amendment was Design Review Board Minutes-April 22,1997 5 seconded by Mr. Gleye. During the discussion Mr.Noonan noted that he doesn't feel that the amendment is necessary as there may be no need for any variation. Mr. Bockhahn and Mr. Springer noted that the variations would be feasible. Chairperson Chisholm noted that.the variation could be vary slightly. The amendment carried 4 - 2,with Chairperson ChishDlm,Ms. Katz, Mr. Gleye, and Mr. McCrone voting for the amendment and Mr. Willett and Mr. Noonan voting against the amendment. The main motion carried 6 - 0. ITEM 4. PROJECT RE-REVIEW A. Grantree Canopy/Fuel Service Bays 1325 North 7th Avenue - A Re-review of the DRB condition requiring a mansard roof on the gas island canopy. Planning Director Andrew Epple noted that the applicants have asked that this application be continued to the next meeting. ITEM 5. INFORMAL REVIEW A. Grace Bible Church Informal#I-9721 -(Arkell) Stucky Road and S. 19th Avenue Tom Milleson and Dan Kamp joined the DRB. Associate Planning Director Debbie Arkell presented the project. She noted the proposal is for two accesses - one from Stucky and one from S. 19th. She continued with the height restrictions and the exceptions. Mr. Cruwys asked if the parking accommodates future expansion, thus removing the need to remove the asphalt to for the expansion. He commended the applicant for reflecting the parking lot with the geometry of the building. Mr. Gleye asked about the colors and materials to be used. Mr. Milleson noted that the building would be mostly dry-vit with stone trim and the colors would be subdued. Chairperson Chisholm asked Planner Arkell to describe the height limitations, which she did, and added that the applicant should be able to easily construct a two story building with either a 6:12 or 6:3 roof pitch. Chairperson Chisholm asked Mr. Kamp if he had some issues or questions for the Board. Mr. Kamp noted that he was asking for general input from the Board. He continued . that the roof is intended to be metal rather than asphalt, however, cost will be a driving factor. Mr. Gleye noted that this project will be a handsome addition to S. 19th Avenue. He was concerned about the huge expanse of dry-vit in the steeple. Mr. Kamp explained the subtle use of a cross in the steeple. Discussion followed on parking calculations, adding greenspace to the parking lot using berms and/or parking "fingers". Chairperson Chisholm added that the canopy seems to be a change in character from the main church and the other wings. Mr. Kamp noted that they planned the flat roofed canopy to allow Design Review Board Minutes-April 22,1997 6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TUESDAY,APRIL 22, 1997 Members Present: Larry Woodward, Dave Skelton, Craig Brawner,Neil Poulsen, Bret Waters, Roger Sicz, Chuck Winn Staff Present: Debbie Arkell,Dean Patterson, James Nickelson, Pat Estey,Karen Finke,Rick Hixson, Brian Connolley, Carol Schott Visitors Present: Wendy Tage, Ben Lloyd, Joan Rudberg, Gene Mickolio, Don Bockhahn, Tom Milleson,Tammy and John Beyer,Dan Kamp, Bin Chang,Lowell Springer,Lisa Buchanan, Mike Promisco Chairperson Dave Skelton called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. He noted that there were five reviews to be done. A. FINAL WEEK REVIEW 1. Carson Place Subdivision and Zoning PUD#P-9716 &Z-9726 -(Skelton) 1304 West Babcock Street - A Subdivision and Zoning PUD Application to allow a 19-unit townhouse PUD subdivision with one of the townhouse buildings to have six units which exceeds the maximum units per cluster of five allowed by the Code. Lowell Springer, Don Bockhahn, and Gene Mickolio joined DRC. Chairperson/Senior Planner Dave Skelton reviewed the application and noted that DRC is to make a formal recommendation to the Planning Board and City Commission at this meeting. He continued by reviewing the conditions (on file in the Planning Office) from Planning Staff,paying particular attention to conditions #9414. He noted that a full 60'utility easement will be required in Phase I for that phase of the infrastructure and later for Phase II when it is approved. Mr. Springer concurred that full curb and gutter will be installed for Phase I and no sidewalks will be installed during this phase due to the location of the mobile homes on the east side. Planner Skelton noted that he thought there would be rolled asphalt curb on the east side rather than concrete. He noted that if the permanent curbing were installed, it could pose problems for the mobile home driveway accesses. Discussion ensued on temporary vs.permanent curbing and curb cuts for shared accesses. Mr. Sicz would rather they install permanent curbs with shared accesses in a couple of places. He noted that the City doesn't want to maintain the snow removal on the narrow part of the street, and would rather not do the full width of the rest of the street until they can plow straight through in Phase II,due to the piling of snow on the sidewalks and porches of adjacent properties, however the City would do the sweeping and other maintenance. Mr. Sicz noted other concerns: 1) the street width doesn't meet the requirements, 2) storm retention should not be totally located along Babcock Street, 3)how is the run-off getting from the east side to the west side of N. 13th, 4) the asphalt sections don't show how thick the asphalt will be. He continued that plowing of the street and drainage are the biggest issues. Development Review Committee-April 22,1997 1 i Mr. Brawner noted that there is to be a storm drainage easement for storm water storage. In response to Mr. Poulsen,Mr. Bockhahn noted that the homes would not have basements. Mr. Brawner noted that he is not in favor of storm drainage being located on private lots as the ponds tend to get filled in for landscaping, gardens, lawns, etc. Mr. Springer noted that the Homeowners' Association has to approve all changes on the site. Discussion ensued on the retention area being too deep and the location of the common open spaces. Mr. Woodward inquired about the locations of the sewer and water lines, as the location of one trailer is within 4' of the property line. He didn't think the utilities could be located as shown as the trailers are too close to the property line. Mr.Woodward reviewed his department's conditions. Mr. Hixson reviewed the conditions from his department. Mr. Springer noted that the adjacent property owner has been reluctant to move the house until he is ready to move it. Mr. Hixson changed condition#9a. from"...public access..."to read"...public street...", added to the first sentence in condition#10 "prior to construction", and in the second paragraph of condition#10 changed"align"to"aligned". Mr. Sicz asked to add, "the maintenance of the temporary curb shall be by the Homeowners'Association"in condition#10. Planner Skelton added"and profiles of the asphalt street for all phases shall be depicted"to condition#11. Mr. Springer inquired if they could keep the services out of concrete to better meet Mr. Woodward's concerns. Discussion followed on this idea. Planner Skelton added that it would be acceptable as long as it did not conflict with the location of the streetscape for the boulevard trees. Mr. Hixson noted that he would add that for Phase II, the widening will mean a total reconstruction of the street to 37', and will be a continuation of the existing street to the south. Mr. Winn asked for the location of the fire hydrant. He noted it should be shown on the plans, mid-block would be adequate. Mr. Hixson moved, Mr. Sicz seconded,to recommend approval with the conditions as per DRC. Planner Skelton clarified that curb and gutter will be installed within three years on the full standard street. Discussion followed on the wording of the clarification. Motion carried 6-0. B. SECOND WEEK REVIEW 1. Montana Kids Child Care Facility Expansion MiSP/COA#Z-9731 - (Arkell) 1105 Campbell Road A Minor Site Plan with a Certificate of Appropriateness Application to allow the construction of a 1728 sq. ft. (footprint)3-car garage with day care center classrooms and facilities on the main level for the Montana Kids Child Care Facility Ben Lloyd, Wendy Tage, and Tammy and John Beyer joined DRC. Assistant Planning Director Debbie Arkell presented the application. She reviewed three conditions from Planning Staff. That will require be reviewed by DRB this afternoon. She noted one condition requires approval from Development Review Committee-April 22,1997 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COvitiIITTEE TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 1997 Members Present: Dave Skelton,Phill Forbes,Larry Woodward,Neil Poulsen, Craig Brawner, Roger Sicz, Chuck Winn Staff Present: Debbie Arkell, Pat Estey,Rick Hixson, James Nickelson, Carol Schott Visitors Present: Don Bockhahn, Lowell Springer, Gene Mickolio, Joan Rudberg,Nadia Beiser Chairperson Dave Skelton called the meeting to order at 10:03 a.m. He noted that there were two reviews and one discussion item on the agenda. A. SECOND WEEK REVIEW 1. Carson Place Subdivision and Zoning PUD#P-9716 & Z-9726 -(Skelton) 1304 West Babcock Street A Subdivision and Zoning PUD Application to allow a 19-unit townhouse PUD subdivision with one of the townhouse buildings to have six units which exceeds the maximum units per cluster of five allowed by the Code. Don Bockhahn and Gene Mickolio joined DRC. Chairperson/Planner Dave Skelton introduced the project and noted that the applicant proposes a full City standard street for N. 13th Avenue with a portion of it being 1/2 a street width. He discussed the property to the east. He continued that the applicant is willing to sign waivers of protest for SID's for West Babcock and S. 13th Avenue. He asked Mr. Sicz if the waivers should include signalization on N. 19th Avenue. Mr. Woodward noted that some mains are shown under existing buildings. Mr. Bockhahn explained that the house is old and will be removed. Mr. Woodward noted that there would be a problem«ith the services due the way the garages are proposed. He continued that when the trenches are dug for installing the water/sewer,they may undermine the garages. He noted that there may be some extra cost with compacting and the applicant may want to consider putting in the footings for the garages after the water/sewer lines are installed. He continued that the curb boxes being installed in concrete will pose problems as they will eventually crack. He asked the applicant hoNti-the services for the property across the road were determined. Mr. Bockhahn noted that the services are for duplexes and are part of the agreement he made with the property owner for the granting of the necessary easement for the roadway. Mr. Sicz asked how the drainage will be controlled. Mr. Springer explained the drainage plan. Mr. Hixson asked for the location of the retention ponds. Mr. Mickolio noted that there is one planned along Babcock Street in the common open space and not in the right-of-way. Discussion ensued on common open space vs. retention pond area. Mr. Hixson noted that the retention pond will have to be deeper than the one foot proposed. Discussion followed on the run-of:-capacities and where the overflow will drain. Mr. Hixson noted that the design has to show that the retention pond will indeed hold the required run-off for a ten-year,two-hour storm event. Development Review Coaunittee Minutes-April 15,1997 l Mr. Hixson noted that Mr.Nickelson has expressed concern about the sanitary sewer layout and the possibility to eliminate some of the proposed manholes. Discussion followed on the manholes to be eliminated. Mr. Brawner suggested that if Mr. Springer would bring in some preliminary elevations, the Engineering Department would be happy to review them. Planner Skelton noted that there will have to be fire hydrants located along N. 13. Mr. Springer 4.7 noted that they have already been approved. Planner Skelton noted that the ground work is being laid for a full width City street on N. 13th Avenue. Mr. Springer noted on the site plan where the street will be full width with all improvements and where it will be % width with curb,gutter, and sidewalk on the west side. Discussion followed on the narrow portion of the street. Mr. Sicz noted that the City doesn't want to maintain the narrow portion. Planner Skelton suggested making it a private street easement until Phase II is developed . Mr. Brawner noted that the temporary curb will at least continue the drainage to the proper point. Discussion continued on the paved surface. Nfr. Brawner suggested installing no parking signs along the narrowed section of the street. lvtr. Hixson noted that a temporary retention pond in the area of Phase II would maybe work until Phase II is constructed. Discussion of snow removal issues ensued. Planner Skelton noted that written comments are due next week. The project will also be reviewed by DRB next week. B. FIRST N`EEK REVIEW 1. Montana Kids Child Care Facility Expansion MiSP/COA#Z-9731 - (Arkell) 1105 Campbell Road - A Minor Site Plan with a Certificate of Appropriateness Application to allow the construction of a 1728 sq. f. (footprint) 3-car garage with day care center classrooms and facilities on the second level for the Montana Kids Child Care Facility Chairperson Skelton introduced the project. Assistant Planning Director Debbie Arkell reviewed the project. She noted that the original improvements have been installed and the LOC has been released. Mr.Woodward inquired how many wells are planned. Planner Arkell noted she would check on the number of wells. Mr. Woodward noted that they will be required to install a separate sewer line and have the water wells metered to determine monthly sewer charges. Mr. Winn asked Planner Arkell to contact the Belgrade Fire District. Chairperson Skelton noted that a decision will be made in two weeks. Planner Arkell noted that DRB will make their decision next week. Mr. Hixson noted that the retention/detention pond information is conflicting. Development Review Committee Minutes.April 15, 1997 2 to the City Commission. The motion carried 6 - 0. B. FIRST WEEK REVIEW 1. Carson Place Subdivision and Zoning PUD#P-9716 & Z-9726 -(Skelton) 1304 West Babcock Street - A Subdivision and Zoning PUD Application to allow a 19-unit townhouse PUD subdivision with one of the townhouse buildings to have six units which exceeds the maximum units per cluster of five allowed by the Code. Chairperson Skelton presented the application. He reviewed the pre-application comments from Mr. Woodward and Ms.Finke. He noted that the application is for townhouse units and is a phased development. He continued that Mr.Bockhahn has been negotiating for a full public street for South 13th to Mendenhall. He is proposing to do %of the street with curb and gutter on that %z. Mr. Hixson asked Planner Skelton if there is a 60'right-of-way proposed. Planner Skelton noted that since Mr. Bockhahn can only dedicate %2 of the street and obtain an easement on the adjoining property for the other %z. Mr. Woodward asked for clarification on how the location of the sewer hookups were determined. Discussion followed on that issue. Planner Skelton noted that in Phase II the full City street will be dedicated. Also,he noted that the project has been substantially improved since DRC last saw it. He continued that DRC will see this application two more weeks. C. INFORMAL, REVIEWS 1. Taco John's Informal - (Skelton) An Informal Application for the replacement of the existing 23' X 48' building with a 28' X 66 building. Summary of notes for files: Chairperson Skelton re,,iewed the application. Richard Knell joined DRC. Mr. Knell noted the reasons for replacing the building. 1) The current building is pieced together. 2)The building is required to be replaced by the year 2000 according to the corporate office. He also noted-that since he is removing his pole sign, he will need some front signage. Planner Skelton noted the deviations that will be requ:sted. He noted that a concern would be the access onto Beall and N. 7th. Mr. Knell unfolded a plan which indicated the locations of sewer/water/gas lines. Planner Skelton asked him to comment on the traffic circulation pattern. Mr. Forbes noted that the access onto Beall Street is unsafe. He noted that the someday the street will probably be improved. He asked if the entire building could be moved further to the west. Mr. Knell noted that it would be lost behind the furniture store. Discussion followed on the current tapering of West Beall Street, the N. 7th Street median being a hindrance for turning into Taco John's, and on the stggestion that the building be flip-flopped, which would put the drive-up on the north side of the building. Nfr. Knell noted that he would Development Review Committee`linutes-April 8, 1997 2 BOZEMA* CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE Bozeman 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE City-County P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771-0640 Planning Office PHONE: (406)582-2360 FAX: (406) 582-2363 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC MEETING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY- COUNTY PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday,May 6, 1997, at 7:00 p.m., and a public meeting before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday,May 19, 1997, at 3:00 pm. in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman,Montana. The purpose of the public meeting and public hearing is to consider a Conditional Use Permit Application for a Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application for Carson Place Townhouses requested by Lowell Springer, Springer Group Architects, 201 South Wallace Avenue, Bozeman,MT 59715, pursuant to Sections 18.53 and 18.54 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Said application would allow the development of a subdivision for a 19-unit townhouse complex and related site improvements, and would also allow one of four townhouse structures to contain 6 dwelling units, exceeding the maximum of five dwelling units per structure allowed in the "R-3" district. Planned Unit Development subdivision review is being requested to allow for a public street at less than a full City standard street. The subject property is located at 1304 West Babcock,and is legally described as a 1.9 acre tract of land located in the east '/2 of the southwest '/4 of Section 12, T2S, R5E, PMM, Gallatin County,Montana, and is owned by Don Bockhahn, 1500 Mountain Goat Road, Bozeman,MT 59715. The property is zoned "R-3" (Residential- Medium Density)District. Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing before the City-County Planning Board, with the City Commission making the final decision on the project. Written comments may be submitted to the Bozeman City-County Planning Office, P.O. Box 640, Bozeman, MT 59771-0640. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the City- County Planning Office, 35 North Bozeman Avenue, 582-2360. For those who require accommodations for disabilities,please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). #P-9716 and#Z-9726 Carson Place TH. SUBMITTED 04/17/97 FOR SUNDAY, 04/20/97 DISPLAY AD PUBLICATION. PLEASE PRINT WITH NORTH ARROW UP, BOLD WHERE INDICATED, AND SEND AFFIDAVIT TO CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE. Babcock Street i Subject fltl / l:,roperty CI1 DR. a < ' �t,.4:.. r t ..• '.,,,_=.e7 'r:4^,.x.3<r:'+. e'�i:.�.�"-. ~�.a':. .fc �.FI .iwr> -. I W 5 > �I North ^ Z > W I W Q > > N Q Q _ 1 2 W Q = f _ r � I ' I BOZEMA. . CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE Bozeman 05 NORTH 13OZEMAN AVENUE City-County P.O.BOX 640,BOZEMAN.MONTANA 59771-OG40 Planning Office PHONE: (406) 502-2360 FAX: (406) 502-2363 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC MEisTING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT NOTICE:IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY- COUNTY PLANNING BOARD on Tuesday, May 6, 1997, at 7:00 p.m., and a public meeting before the BOZ'EMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, May 19, 1997,at 3:00 p.m, in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman,Montana. The purpose of the public meeting and public hearing is to consider a Conditional Use Permit Application for n Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application for Carson Place Townhouses requested by Lowell Springer,Springer Group Architects, 201 Soutli Wallace Avenue, Bozemain, NIT 59715, pursuant to Sections 18,53 and 19.54 of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Said application would allow the development of a subdivision for a 19-unit townhouse complex and related site improvements, and would also allow one of four townhouse structures to contain 6 dwelling units, exceeding the maximum of five dwelling units per structure allowed in the "R-3" district. Planned Unit Development subdivision review is being requested to allow for n.public street at less than a full City standard street. The subject property is located at 1304 West Babcock, and is legally described as a 1.9 acre tract of land located in the east '/, of the southwest '/. of Section 12, T2S, R5E, PMM, Gallatin County, Montann, and is owned by Don Boekhahn, 1500 Mountain Coat Road, Bozeman, MT 59715. The property is zoned "R-3" (Residential- Medium Density) District. Public testimony will betaken at the public hearing before the City-County Planning Board, with the City Commission making the final decision on the project. Written comments may be submitted to the Bozeman City-County Planning Office, P.O. Box 640, Bozeman, MT 59771-0640. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the City- County Planning Office, 35 North Bozeman Avenue, 592-2360. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2305 (voice), 5£2-2301 (TDD). 11P-9716 and f!Z-9726 Carson Place TH. 12, Babcock Street Subject / 1:'Yoperty -- I I a r : D ; ;l North _ u 1' • • OWNERS - HERITAGE CONDOMINIUMS Edward M. Dobson Sharon Shumacher 118 S. 15th, #1 118 S. 15th, #2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 C. Douglas & Stacey E. Lanphear Wallace W. &Carol Allen Shumacher 118 S. 15th, #3 118 S. 15th, #4 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Mary Golden F. Lee Robinson 3600 MacDonald Rd. P.O. Box Q Bismarck, ND 59504 Bozeman, MT 59771 Gladys E. Moseley & Robert R. & Nancy S. Wolfe Leslie Ann Pace 6823 S. Detroit 122 S. 15th #7 Littleton, CO 80122 Bozeman, MT 59715 Dene M., Linda Jo, & Nicholas A. & Keith N. Tafoya Joshua Doniak 132 S. 15th #10 126 S. 15th #9 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Sara Lee Edmo Herbert S. & Eleanor L. Kirk 132 S. 15th #11 132 S. 15th #13 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Stephen P. Renken Michael Patrick &Bonnie Jean Hickey 6310 Edinburgh 128 S. 15th #15 Colleyville, TX 76034 Bozeman, MT 59715 Frederik M. Leitch Garnet D. Hoell, William E. Hoell and 200 S. 15th #16 Jeanette A. Hoell Bozeman, MT 59715 200 S. 15th #17 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bruce L. Rubin Helen C. Evans 733 Graydon Avenue 360 Locust Norfolk VA 23507 Shelly, ID 83274 Frank L. & Barbara Lyons Gilbert E. Curtis 5 Mallard Lane 206 S. 15th #21 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 John Bradley Mathis Joe E. Lowe 206 S. 15th #22 112 South Devinney St. Bozeman MT 59715 Golden CO 80401 Judy M. Gossack Jim Perlinski & 210 S. 15th #24 Christine D. Anderson Bozeman, MT 59715 P.O. Box 1804 Bozeman, MT 59715 Juerg & Katherine A. Schmid Harold R. & Janelle M. Dixon III 216 W. 16th #26 132 S. 15th #27 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 G. Ray & Rose L. Wiman Henry & Diana L. Barber 206 S. 15th #28 % James H. Simmons Bozeman, MT 59715 35 E. Mendenhall Bozeman, MT 59715 David A. & Mary Ann Hopkins Peter A. & Shirley B. Thatcher Jo Ann Kralich 225 Pioneer Dr. #31 Box 1525 Bozeman, MT 59715 Great Falls, MT 59401 Adam & Deborah Priguette Jessica M.H. Winter&John A. Winter 225 Pioneer Dr. #32 6316 W. Alice Bozeman, MT 59715 Savannah, IL 61074 Sharon L. Evenson Stephen J. & Pamela N. Blockey 225 Pioneer Dr. #34 225 Pioneer Dr. #35 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Julia J. Widener Roger J. Meredith 221 Pioneer #37 221 Pioneer Dr. #38 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Celia B. French Sheila Burke Bruce 202 Pioneer Dr. #40 202 Pioneer Dr. #41 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Becky Lou Downey Reed Family Trust, Robert R. & Box 1226 Sydney Reed, Trustees Bozeman, MT 59715 878 Hillside Ave. Albany CA 94706 • Margaret M. Henkel Harold E. & Karen A. Bouse 202 Pioneer Dr. #43 206 Pioneer Dr. #44 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Mary Faith Ryffel James F. & Josephine L. Placek 3812 Wayland Dr. 206 Pioneer Dr. #46 Fort Worth TX 76133 Bozeman, MT 59715 David A. & Mary Ann Hopkins Old West Builders, Inc. Box 1525 218 Pioneer Dr. Great Falls, MT 59401 Bozeman, MT 59715 BOZEAN CITY-COUNTY , PLANNING OFFICE Bozeman 35 NORTH BOZEMAN AVENUE City-County P.O. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-0640 Planning Office PHONE: (406)582-2360 FAX: (406)582-2363 April 3, 1997 Lowell Springer Springer Group Architects 201 South Wallace Avenue Bozeman,MT 59715 Dear Lowell: Your applications for a Subdivision PUD and a Zoning PUD for Carson Place Townhouses have been received and assigned to Senior Planner Dave Skelton. The applications have been reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklists and appear to meet the submittal requirements. However,please understand that during the course of review there may be other items identified or issues which need to be addressed. Should that occur, Planner Skelton will be in contact with you and/or your client. The Development Review Committee.(DRC) will be reviewing the applications on two consecutive Tuesdays, {4/15 & 4/221, at 10:00 a.m. in the Commission Meeting Room at City Hall. Staff recommends that you and/or your client attend these meetings to answer any questions that may arise. Agendas will be sent to you and/or your client to remind you of the dates and times of these meetings. The project is also tentatively scheduled to go before the Planning Board on May 6th and before the City Commission on May 19th. If these dates should change, Planner Skelton will notify you. If you have any further questions regarding the process or your project in general,please contact Planner Skelton. Sincerely, Carol L. Schott Planning Secretary enc: receipts for checks (sent to Mr.,Bockhahn) cc: Don Bockhahn, 1500 Mountain Goat Trail, Bozeman, MT 59715 AAk City of Bozeman N 2 12946 Receipt 00 $ Bozeman, M ntana * j 19 ,--�— Received of the sum of / , lidDollars for t� C 2 � �9�� BOZEMAN CITY-COUNTY PLANNING OFFICE CITY- FEBEB i�, 1997 KAMM CARNEGIE BUILDING — 35 NORTH BOZEMAN P. 0. BOX 640, BOZEMAN, MONTANA 597.15 (406) 582-2360 (FAX #582-2363) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- Certain uses, while generally not suitable in a particular Zoning District, may, under certain circumstances, be acceptable. When such circumstances exist, a Conditional Use Permit may be granted subject to certain conditions . The permit is granted for a particular use and not for a particular person or firm. No Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a use which is not specifically designated as a conditional use in the subject district regulations of the Zone Code. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 . Name and address of property owner: Don Bockhaln; 1500 Mountain Goat Trail; Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone• 586-2400 2 . Name and address of applicant: Springer Group Architects, P.C. ; 201 South Wallace; Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 585-2400 3 . Name and address of Engineer/arshitpr.t/Planner: Lowell W. Springer; L 201 South Wallace: Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: 585-2400 4 . Name of project/development: Carson Place 5 . Address of proposed development: 1304 W. Babcock; Bozeman, MT 59715 6 . Legal description: E15, SW% of Siection 12, T2S, R5E. M.P.M. 7 . Current Zoning . R-3 Land Area 83.124 sq.ft. 1 .91 acres 8 . Describe the proposed development (use additional sheets if necessary: A 19-unit townhouse complex with one townhouse bdilding!,of six units which exceeds the maximum units per cluster of five allowed by the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. 9 . Review Fee: $660 .00 (Minimum fee after refund: $400.00) This application must be accompanied by appropriate fee and copies of a completed site plan (see submittal requirements) drawn to scale on paper not larger than 24"x36" . Application deadline varies . Please check with the Planning Office for date. This application must be signed by both the applicant and property owner (if different) before the submittal will be accepted. I (We) reby rtify that the above information is true and corre t t the b st of my (our) knowledge. i Applicant's tur Pr perty Owner's LSigna=::::5 e J r