The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About638300222638232621) • 1 _ •. • ssa ;} r til y v� • FILE REVIEW SHEET CITY COMMISSION PROJECT DECISION File Name: C'U 4m;nJ1uo File Number: -:�b c��3 7 Reference Files: -Cat-(O 1 -p Q Q CR Date Date Done N/A I h e 12, Due Done By Accept for initial review letter (5 working daps after apphcauotideacll.ine) 10 I 1 1 ' ❑ Adequate for continued review letter (20 working dal s after application deadline) to D5 ❑ .DRC itiitial week review/public corrvnetit period begins �Q J a 31 �, ❑ DRC second week review C�(�S-{' a a- WQ& y lM Q/ ) ❑ DRC final week reviewIY 1' ❑ DRB staff report or ADR draft conditions due-if applicable (p qq DRB meeting-if applicable co V1 VJh-i-WRB review-if applicable Corntnents from other review agencies due h ( QL [ Prepare pt:oject map for notices �� 3 1 (� ❑ Notice to applicant and adjoiners (not less than 15 or.more than 15 w94.wogdays before the City Commission hearin I El !2, �'� �ei, Post notice (not less than 15 or more than 45 we44ag days before the CitT to 121 ❑ Conan-fission hearingl Newspaper notice (not less than 15 or more than 45 woekitrg daps before the City O f ❑ Commission hearings City Commission staff report due ❑ City Commission hearing date A 1hl ❑ Final approval letter to applicant ❑ Recommended Recommended Approval Recommended Date N/A Approval witli Conditions Denial DRC action W 115 ❑ D.RB action 3--I N� i0 I�5 ❑ \`(IW action Approved Approved w. t.Conditions Denied Date City Commission action Date Final Site Plan clue: Date of Final Site Plan approval: Date Final Site Plan approval expires: improvements Agreement required? ❑ Yes ❑ No Date returned: Date financial guarantee received: Date financial guarantee expires: Date financial guarantee released: Date Temporary Occupancy is granted: Date Final Occupancy is granted: � i11 Project Activitu A City of Bozeman ® ® Department of Piannina&.Community Development Project Name: �� 0� File No: 2 Date Activity- Staff Staff Cumulative � n Member(s) Hours Hours , i i i i i i i i i i I I i i I � Ii t 3ffidauit of Pu� lication STATE OF MONTANA, SS. County of Gallatin being duly sworn, deposes and says: That�e is ��lL_p of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle; a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and that the notice here unto annexed 2 has been correctly published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said paper for consecutive , the first of which publication was made on the day of O T 20 O�O, and the last on ,NjIII►►f the day of -20 pT A R/,I 2; Z*bed worn to before me this < — .200 SEAL OF Mk 0\,�` Notary Public for the State of Montana, >� residing at Bozem n,Montana. Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at Bozeman, Montana My Commission Expires June 27, 2008 i I REGION BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, October 29, 2006 C5 Keepsakes help family membersC1 o* se to te h e art cope with the loss of loved ones GREAT FALLS(AP)—Even sakes have come available to the Memory Glass and man- tion of the grandkids or young though her husband passed give those left behind some- made diamonds called children,they usually want away more than a year ago, thing more to help them cope LifeGems,are constructed using something,"he said. Diane Carter continues'to ter- with the loss of their loved ones. actual ashes.Pet cremains are Some people buy a keepsake rorize him with her driving. Carter's shopping spree was used in such keepsakes as well. for each member of the family. "I just hang himlaround my for that exact purpose—so When Karen Davidson lost Others don't buy any at all. neck and take him/with me everybody could have a little bit her pets Elle,Billy and Addie, "It's a very personal choice," everywhere I go'r'the Great Falls of Jerry. she had their ashes placed.in an said Scott Lukkason,general woman said.`7 "Cremation rates are on the urn she keeps at her house. manager at O'Connor Funeral Since,xi' sothelioma took rise across the United States," "I put it out on the porch in Home."Everyone has their own ,•Jgkn, 'tarter's life in May 2005, said Todd Carmichael,funeral the day,and they come in at ideas of what they like(for me- .� Diane Carter purchased more director at O'Connor Funeral night,"said Davidson,who morial):' than a dozen memory keepsakes Home."With cremation,you works at Croxford Funeral Because the keepsakes are ai" .from Schnider Funeral Home have more options(for memo- Home. personal choice,funeral homes for herself as well as family rialization)than you do with She also keeps some of the don't carry a stock of the many ' members.The items range from burial.But even with burial ashes inside a metal tube that available items.Ask your funeral *. the sterling silver cross necklace there are things you can do,like dangles from her key chain. director about the different fi to little teardrop bottles to the put a lock of hair into jewelry or "I've never been able to bury keepsake options. three Memory Glass globes she necklaces' my pets;I just want to keep Here's a look at some of the recently received.Each keepsake Innovative minds have an- them with me,"she said. newer and more unique keep- AP contains a small amount of swered a calling for memorabil- This feeling is a common sakes available at local funeral Diane Carter gets a first look Jerry's ashes. is to represent both the buried thread among folks who've lost homes. glass globes containing,as part of the ornamentation, "My friends all think I'm a and the cremated.Fanciful urns, family members or friends. Memory glass—When a•small quantify of the ashes of her late .freak,"Carter said with a laugh. engravable indoor and outdoor However,for some the idea of Carter saw the Memory Glass husband,Jerry,in Great Falls on Oct Grave markers, the "They say if they ever get a gift plaques,fingerprint and foot- carrying around ashes or a lock she thought it would be fitting sprinkling of ashes—these traditional forms of memorializing rializing from me it's going to be from print pendants,flowers im- of hair is something that takes a for her husband,who was para- loved ones have not gone to the wind. Keepsakes have become Schnider's.' printed with words and photos, little getting used to.Some folks plegic since a plane crash in available to give those left behind something more to help them Grave markers,urns,the and wax shells containing fu- shy away from the idea at first, 1969. cope with the loss of their loved ones. sprinkling of ashes—these tra- neral flowers are among them. said Dennis Croxford,owner of ditional forms of memorializing. Some items contain secret Croxford Funeral Home and I I I I I I I loved ones have not gone to the chambers to hold strands of Crematory. wind.Rather,an array of keep- hair or ashes while others,like "If it's brought to the atten- , ROCKYMOUNTAIN TIN. all thesponsors, . donors, andsuch a great success! attendees who helped make Spooktacular 2006 "Your Heating & Air Experts" AMERICAN BANK 7640 Shedhorn Drive BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE e KTVM NBC * MT REAL ESTATE OF Bozeman MY 103.5 * CHUCK & DONNA PECK * PROFORMA INFOSYSTEMS Phone: 406-5821,8803RESSLER AUTO - BOZEMAN PRINTING COMPANY - www.rockymountaintin.com Turn to the Exrwrr MORTGAGEMONTANA IMPORT GROUP -LOYAL DESIGN LUZENAC AMERICA - MANN * Finance charges will accrue on the purchase from the date of purchblt .but no minimum monthly payments will be due prior to the promotion expiration date as indicted on your billing statement ' DAVIDSON and if you pay the cash sales price of the purchase prior to the prom on period expiration date, no finance charges will be due on the purchase.Standard APR is 19. %;N ult Rate APR is GARDEN INN 26.99%.Minimum monthly finance charge is$.50. JDIO AV NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FORA SUBDty1S1ON PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FORA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA PLANNED UNIT 77DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINA PLAN WITH RELAXATIONS 'Applications have been submitted that would allowli ajor subdivision for a planned unit develo mert wl develop AF me on property generally bounded by Baxer Lane, North 11th Avenue, West Oak Street, and dren's Museum of Boze n 234 E. Babcock Street • Bozeman,MT 59 Rorth 15th Avenue. 522 9087 • www.cmbozeman.org 'The purpose of the public hearing before Planning Bad is to consider the subd vision Preliminary Plat applica- lion only,and the public hearing before City Commissn is to consider the subd vision Preliminary Plat applica- tion and further to consider a Conditional Use Permior PUD Preliminary Plah application with relaxations for NOTICE OFA PUBLIC HEARING FORA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT the proposed PT Land Planned Unit Developmeirequested by the owners, PT Land,Jerry Perkins, TO MODIFYA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 511 North Wallace Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715757,and representative, Morrison-Maierle, Inc., 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808, pursuant to Chters 18.06, 18.34, 18.35 and -8.66 of the Bozemar Mu- A Conditional Use Permit(CUP)application has'been submitted that would allow a modification to nicipal Code. an approved Planned Unit Development(PUD)with expanded relaxations.The original Wal- ton Homestead PUD was approved with relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single house- The applicant is requesting relaxation of standards ine Bozeman.Municipal Code for the following-foot asphalt hold detached residential-dwelling units to be constructed on 3,800 square foot lots(smaller than the 18.44.080.A,to not build a sidewalk on the north sicbf Baxter Lane;2)18.44.080.A,to build a 10 foot asphalt normal requirement of 5,000 square feet)with lot widths of 40 feet(10 feet less than the standard 50 trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxtiane;3)18A4.060,to build North 15th Avenue behveen Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide ccctor standard instead of a 9G-foot collector standard;4) foot lot width requirement). Due to asurveying/construction error on Lot 12 m the south,the owners 18.44.060,to build North 15th Avenue between PA Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the and applicants of both lots are requesting that Lot 11,Block 5,Walton Homestead Planned Unit west side;5118.44,to not construct a planned collecttreet(North 15th Avenue!from Tschache Lane to Baxter Development be permitted to have an even smaller lot area (3,555 square feet)and lot width(37.4 Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide pite drive to serve as the connection between Tschache feet)for a new single household detached dwelling unit. This will allow both units to maintain five Lane to Baxter Lane; 6) 18.44.010.E,to terminate Tsche Lane in a dead-end near the west property line; 7) foot side yard setbacks. 18.42.040.B,to allow blocks of.more than 400 feet ength due to topography,the presence of critical lands, and access control; 8) 18.42.040.B, to allow Block exceed 1,320 feet in length;9) 18.42.040.C, to a low. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the CUP/PUD Modification Application as submitted blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcomeIcific disadvantages of topography and orientation; 10) by the property owners, Paul & Melissa Cronin, PO Box 160556, Big Sky Montana, 59716 and Ross 18.42.040.13,to not provide a right-of-way with pedean walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in McMilin,3950 Dry Creek Road, Belgrade, Montana 59114,and the applicants, Legends Studios, Inc., excess of 600 feet; 11► 18.42.100.B.6.a,to permit ore stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 600 North Wallace Avenue,Loft One, Bozeman MT 59715,pursuant to the Bozeman Unified Develop- south of Ts 8 42.10hache .13.1c,to reduce the watercoursitback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton.Stream/D tch ment Ordinance. e. co The property is located at 710 Said applications would allow development of-4'ires into 18 lots for mmercial development and North 15th Avenue and is legally described as Lot 11,Block 5,Walton open space with American Federal Savings Baps the initial phase of the PUD,on property generall Homestead Subdivision PUD,City of Bozeman,Gallatin County,Montana.The zoning desig bounded by Baxter Lane, North 11th Avenue,West Street,and North 15th Avenue.The proerty is legally nation for said property is R-3(Residential Medium Density District). described as Tract 2A COS 1215F, located in Section2S,R5E,PMM,City of Bozeman,Gallatin County,M)n- tans.The zoning designation for said property is B-bmmunity Business Districtl. PUBLIC MEETING Bozeman City Commission PUBLIC HEARING Monday,11/13/06,6 pm On Preliminary Plat Only PUBLIC HEARING Community Meeting Room BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION Third Floor Tuesday, Nov.21,2006 7:00 p.m. Aonday,Dec. 11,2006 6:00 p.m. Gallatin County Courthouse Community Roorr 311 West Main Street City Commission Meeting Room Gallatin County Courthouse Gallatin County Courthouse ° Bozeman, Montana 411 West Main Street 311 Nest Main Street Bozeman, Montana Bozeman, Montana The City invites the public to comment in writing and attend public hearings.Writ- The City invites the Jublic to comment in R'�:3 ten comments may be directed to the City.of _ writing and to attend the public hearings. Bozeman Department of Planning and Com- Written comments may be directed to the munity Development, P 0. Box 1230, Boze- City of Bozeman' Department of Planning Subject man,MT 59771-1230.Maps and related data and Community y Development, P. 0. Box Property regarding this application may be reviewed Subject ea+ J�--=-_ 1230, Bozeman, MT 5977;-1230. Maps and in the City of Bozeman Department of Plan- Property te,�.' i related data regarding this application may ning and Community Development, Alfred be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Depart- ment of Planning and Community Develop- ) M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive B_Z Street, 582-2260. For those who require ac- z. ,,r moot, Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, commodations for disabilities,please contact (n ; 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those �.• ? who require accommcdations for disabili- ties,St Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, w ? ties, please contact Ron Ere City of Boz- 1 ..;..� "' y y Z 582-2306 -(voice), 582-2301 (TOO). Walton �' " f omen ADa Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), Homestead Lot 11 Modification to PUD 582-2301 (TOO). 2,#Z-06237 WjOak St PT Land PUD Preliminary Plan/Plat R=0 R-4IFQ-06230PP-06057. C6 BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE, Sunday, October 29, 2006 THE WEST After the ' fire Cleanup from Washington wildfire °y could be most expensive in history 4y CONCONULLY,Wash.(AP) Twenty-three ercent of the dropped b helicopter in 1-ton icism b environmental rou s, � tY- P PP Y P Y g P —Smoke still trickles from fire zone burned severely. bales over the heaviest burn ar- rehabilitation efforts in the first p smoldering stumps in north- "By and large every tree is eas.The straw provides cover year cost just$3.6 million,ac- central Washington,the result of dead in the areas that are severe- from rain and snow for scorched cording to Patty Buret,public a massive wildfire that roared ly burned,"said Mel Bennett,a soil. information officer for the through 274 square miles of forest hydrologist assigned to Less severely burned areas are Rogue River-Siskiyou National state and federal land. the recovery team,which in- to be fertilized to help damaged Forest.The fire covered some The Tripod fire wasn't the dudes engineers,botanists,biol- plants recover.Roughly 7,000 5.00,000 acres. largest blaze of 2006— ogists and cultural resources acres are to be seeded with stur- "Certainly,there was a lot of Montana's Derby fire burned specialists,among others. dy grasses,and workers will land treatment—seeding, 297 square miles of forest,and The recovery effort doesn't clear noxious weeds such as dif- mulching=and the removal of Nevada is cleaning up nearly 1 try to replace what's been dam- fuse knapweed and dalmatian hazard trees,she said."But much million acres,burned by several aged by the fire,but to reduce toadflax that could choke out of the Biscuit fire burned in a' fires,in one region alone. further harm to now-fragile land emerging plants. wilderness area,which,requires a But the remote land scorched that is exposed to the elements. Terry Lillybridge,a plant different kind of management.' - in Washington state includes The team works long.hours, ecologist on the team,estimates The Hayman fire in hundreds of miles of roads and for weeks on end,to evaluate a 50-50 chance for success. Colorado's Pike-San Isabel trails,river channels and wildlife hazards and develop a recovery "The success of seeding de- National Forest,about 30 miles habitat that must be protected plan to submit.The expense for pends on what happens next southwest of Denver,consumed from erosion after the blaze.The the Tripod fire:$28 million. spring,he said."You end up 133 homes en,route to scorching U.S.Forest Service is asking for The Forest Service already has with a rainstorm that might not 137,760 acres in 2002,said $28 million over the next two received$14 million to Begin the normally be a problem on a veg- spokeswoman Cass Cairns. years to complete what maybe work this fall before heavy snow. etated slope,become a problem. Recovery costs:$18.1 million. ., the most expensive rehabilita- falls,and hopes the rest of the Maybe in a case where 80 per- Even in northeast Nevada, tion project the agency has ever money will be approved next cent of the rainfall might soak where fires this summer burned undertaken. . year to complete the project. in,maybe 80 percent comes 10 percent of the 11 million-acre . "The flames have died down, Work includes clearing downstream instead," Elko Ranger District of the i and the firefighters have gone downed trees and cutting haz- For Jenkins,Bennett and Bureau of Land Management, `1 home,but the work is just be- ardour trees that have been• Lillybridge,the operation is the rehabilitation costs only total ginning,"said Doug Jenkins, weakened and could fall on 259 largest they can remember after $14 million so far. AP Forest Service spokesman for miles of road and 70 miles of many years with the Forest While the costs are certain to A helicopter drops straw Oct. 12 on a section of forest near the recovery effort. trail inside the fire lines.This is Service. go higher,the area doesn't have Conconully,Wash.,that was burned by the Tripod fire. - The Tripod fire,two fires that not salvage logging,which is "It's the biggest I've been as- many trails or roads that need joined after being sparked sepa- generally conducted later. sociated with in my recent work,said Mike Brown,district rately by lightning,burned Also,culverts must be rebuilt, memory—at least in the last 30 public affairs officer. Using 175,184 acres just south of the and in some cases enlarged,to years,"Bennett said. "That's part of the reason Canadian border,briefly threat- handle runoff from snow and At Oregon's Biscuit fire in some of the fires got so big,be- ening the remote hamlets of rain in the coming months. 2002,where salvage operations cause of the access to them. Pay less for your Internet! Conconully and Loomis tucked Erosion poses the bi gest risk, became the subject of harsh crit- There wasn't any,"he said. away in the thick Okanogan and Bennett said,resultng in land- Wenatchee national forests. slides and sediment.oading in �,Cp MoN TuE Keep your AOL email The forests,hard hit by a streams important b threatened S 4„ �� uE address and switch to bark beetle outbreak,provided and endangered fish P DINNER_'.SPECIAL Internet Montana today! ready fuel.In areas where the Erosion also could increase 3 fire burned hottest,all the by up to 400 percent stream USDA Chojee 180Z ShQtt Cut round cover or duff—small or flows in some drainages during J ' g TBone�tomple'te Dinner$18:50 Get dialup for as low as downed trees and branches, peak periods of rainfall and bushes and shrubs,forest debris snowmelt,flooding downstream AS '`Weekday Lunch. $5, $1 U, Or$15! —burned away.Standing trees communities. Served TflesdalhSaturday ai'e scorched sticks,their root An estimated 270 truck loads �+ °;n'� , Call today! systems beyond repair.Soil has of straw have been delivered to CAtit284�6929°FOR RESERVATIONS Y Y P fw �� ._ � been seared to a fine,gray ash. the Tripod fire alone,to be Major Credit �� e�Aours Ma.Ift 1l{gose,sacsun 12.6 \ 5 8 7-10 73 Cards Accepted /'t' 1�ning Room Fbars(open 7',Evenir�s A,week) 'k NOTICE TO BOZEMAN RESIDENTS a i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Bozeman Planning Board will conduct a public hearing at 7:00 p.m.,November 7,2006 in the Commission Meeting Room,City Hall;411 East Main,Bozeman,MT.The Bozeman City Commission will conduct a public hearing at 7:00 p.m.,November 13,2006 in the Community Room,Gallatin County Courthouse,311 West Main,Bozeman,MT for the purpose of receiving public input regarding an ordinance adopting an urban renewal Ian for the portion of North Seventh Avenue «rdor P P 9P P 9 9 P• 9 P P QQ ' and adjacent neighborhoods outlined on the vicinity map below. ` N ' Copies of the draft Ian are available at the office of the City Clerk in City Hall 411 East Main Street and at the Planning and'Communi Development office, ,and k P P N tV g • ty p 20 East Olive Street on the City's website at www.hozemon.net. Any interested parties are invited to submit written testimony to the Clerk's Office at PO Box 1230;Bozeman, 9711 1230,via email at agenda@bozemon.net or attend thec Ova,, ,f,,,.�r .�« ( hearing and provide testimony regarding the plan. h{aM^'"xeOva �,�Y`"'�'• ' aii oK asla.�kid« �Y^ k ap�. �• f2ilra+�.l-.�� + . iJs�jr 1k This meeting is open to all members of the public. If you have a disability ifiat requires assistance,please contact our ADA Coordinator,Ron Brey,at 582-2307 (voi(e)or 582-2301 (TDD) • • • Revised:1o109M i i . Nordic —• • '• • — -� Lelgend- 'k Sept.15—Oct. 31, $150 -a F Parcels Nov. • After December �. North 7th 71D l3o dory • • • I - • • 1 / __ N.7th TID Parcels Big Sky's Original! Enjoy a prime rib feast c d delightful musicalentertainment after • czyr NRO ' •- through the snowy woods. • ••995-2783 for reservations. < Vsg • z • ; e L C RIDA The • • " Perfect MOUNTAIN rg g 1 -A LONE R ? F Can •- redeemed for Dining, Outdoor SV• T MANDRVRJX LN ; Purchases or - •ls, Ski Trail Passes, • O and Sleighride Dinners. Lone ` Y o "f 'i Mountain Ranch Between ..— ESkyx 6 Rt z - • ti W OAR sr _ s ST y m�v BUILDING z • Y < . . ry • -T_ : � . w- � . F . 8-A fi B ILDING OTN COMMz TyBUILDING Du N.Rrd W Si MOTION TO B ,"NO t BRID6eR SKI FOUNDATION NOR eam s> SaTORDAY,NeveMBeR 11,10 3OP , HILTOWS TicketS$25 available at Threshold Sp•rM td 1119m re tints. W Bangtali Bike a Ski and at Me door.for MOO 1r=5B�S2?2 RBA,Y 0rv1alta04rdI4191 D \ C&� Citciwit cu•,Ce ®< - DIInwcli INS R t � 1-4 7e TYPRI�S- " pt • `�� .,..-r .n� .vmarCKkA. W MAIN Sr V 2 Zp CO4�' � �� Iinthcrtuim�iAlT��r; 1,OODfeet �9LLtlOIWII rLt!li1t1811iA1��l Rlee• � ul X �S �1ea►sc �e SurP they record C%Ap pond . b,t;rc we aQ Ph V'e Sub • Ext mP+• K.K- r � CIOF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net December 1, 2005 Legends Studio, Inc. 600 North Wallace Avenue, Loft One Bozeman MT 59715 RE: Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead PUD Modifications, #Z-06237 Dear Becky &Kira: The Conditional Use Permit Application to modify the Walton Homestead PUD and allow an undersized Lot 11, Block 5 was approved by the City Commission on November 13, 2006. Please provide the Planning Office with a copy of the enclosed Conditions .of a Conditional Use Permit once this document has been recorded at the Clerk& Recorder's Office. Note the following condition and code provisions: Condition of Approval: 1. The approval for the 3,555 square foot lot shall only apply to Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development. Code Provisions: a) That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. b) That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior t:.) the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 582-2260. Sincerely, t1' `Susan Kozub,AICP Associate Planner CC: Paul &Melissa Cronin, PO Box 160556,Big Sky NIT 59716 Ross McMilin, 3950 Dry Creek Road, Belgrade MT 59714 C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc, 1.091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman MT 59718 Enc. Conditions of a Conditional Use Permit planning • zoning subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing grant administration • neighborhood coordination CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATEDAT 718 NORTH 15TH AVENUE, BOZEMAN MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to allow an additional Planned Unit Development relaxation for a smaller lot area (3,555 square feet) and lot width (37.4 feet) for a new single household detached dwelling unit at property located at 718 North 15th Avenue; WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD), City of Bozeman, Gallatin Counvi, Montana.; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following condition and code provisions: Condition of Approval: 1. The approval for the 3,555 square foot lot shall only apply to Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development. Code Provisions: a) That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. b) That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running wit- the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted one(1)condition of Conditional Use Permit and code provisions shall be binding upon me,the undersigned owner of the subject property, my successors or assigns, as long as the subject property is being used as a single household residence. WALTON HOMESTEAD CUP2/PUD#Z-06237 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATED THIS DAY OF ) 2006. PROPERTY OWNER Ross McMinn STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,2006,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Ross Mcl ilia, known to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (Printed Name Here) (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at My Commission Expires: (Use 4 digits for expiration year) WALTON HOMESTEAD CUP2/PUD#Z-06237 Co Fission Memorandum I TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Susan Kozub,Associate Planner SUBJECT: Walton Homestead PUD/CUP Modifications II (Lot 11), #Z-06237 MEETING DATE: Monday,November 13, 2006 at 6 pm BACKGROUND: A Conditional Use Permit-(eUP) application has been submitted that would allow aim`odification-to`an-a proved_PlannedU ut.Dez�elopment_(P_U��with expanded relaxations, Thy _e o`ngirial Wilton-Homestead PUD3was approved by the City Commission in April of 2003 including relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single household detached residential dwelling units to be constructed onC.TN'0 square food lots (smaller than the normal requirement of 5,000 square feet) witbjq widths_of,>40-feet(10 feet less than the standard 50 foot lot width requirement). Due to a ju ng./con-s, t ddh error on Lot 12 to the south, the owners and applicants of both lots are now requesting that Zjf 11?Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development be permitted to have an even Es— 11 lot-area-(3;555 quare-feet)`anddo.t-wid'tFA(137,4 feet) for a new single household detached dwelling unit. This w •allow-both=units-to---naintain-s ndardrfivesfoot s� ideyard_se_tbackss 3,55 9��5 Minor changes to PUDs can be approved adIninistrati ely; however, because the -change eincludes-expanded-zoning-relaxations the application (must-follow-the=same.Planned-U-ni� Development review and public hearing process required for approval of preliminary plans. e-On-October 25;2006;the iDesign�Review--Board=(IDRB)_and--Development-Review Comauttee (DRC)-both voted-to-conditionally-approve the PUD-modification-request. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: The Department of Planning is of aware of=any_'uriresolv'e�is's es for the proposed development at this time. RECOMMENDATION: That tc he-C-ity-=�C-amrff s`sion-approve_the_Mo-dificati:on_to,the NV.alton Homestead Planned-Unit Development fo%I ot_11_ #Z-0623-7-as_conditioned:by staff. FISCAL EFFECTS: The Department of Planning is not aware of any fiscal effects for the proposed development at this time. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. CONTACT: Please email Susan Kozub at skozub@bozeman.net if you have any questions prior to the public hearing. APPROVED BY: Andrew Epple,Planning Director Chris Kukulski, City Manager i" CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FILE NO. #Z-06237 WALTON HOMESTEAD PUD MAJOR MODIFICATION II ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Application #Z-06237 to modify an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an additional lot area and width zoning relaxation for Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD,City of Bozeman,Gallatin County, Montana PROPERTY OWNERS: Lot 11 Lot 12 Ross McMilin Paul& Melissa Cronin 3950 Dry Creek Road PO Box 160556 Belgrade, Montana 59714 Big Sky Montana, 59716 APPLICANT: Legends Studios, Inc. 600 North Wallace Avenue,Loft One Bozeman MT 59715 REPRESENTATIVE: C&H Engineering, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman MT 59718 DATE/TIME: City Commission 7 pm on Monday, November 13, 2006 in the Community Meeting Room, Gallatin County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street,Bozeman,Montana. REPORT BY: Susan Kozub,Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Conditional Approval PROJECT LOCATION The proposed PUD Modification would only apply to property located at 718 North 131h Avenue and legally described as Lot 11,Block 5,Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana.This property is zoned R-3(Residential Medium Density District)and is designated as "Residential"on the Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan.Please refer to the following map: Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 1 R=3! Subject Property d Q t i Mae St T Z A PROPOSAL A Conditional Use Permit(CUP)application has been submitted that would allow a modification to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) with expanded relaxations. The original Walton Homestead PUD was approved by the City Commission in April of 2003 including relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single household detached residential dwelling units to be constructed on 3,800 square foot lots (smaller than the normal requirement of 5,000 square feet)with lot widths of 40 feet (10 feet less than the standard 50 foot lot width requirement). Due to a surveying/construction error on Lot 12 to the south, the owners and applicants of both lots are now requesting that Lot 11, Block 5,Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development be permitted to have an even smaller lot area (3,555 square feet)and lot width(37.4 feet) for a new single household detached dwelling unit.This will allow both units to maintain standard five foot side yard setbacks. Minor changes to PUDs can be approved administratively; however, because the proposed change includes expanded zoning relaxations,the application must follow the same Planned Unit Development review and public hearing process required for approval of preliminary plans. On October 25,2006,the Design Review Board (DRB) and Development Review Committee (DRC) voted to conditionally approve the PUD modification request. ADJACENT LAND USES &ZONING The subject property is zoned R-3(Residential Medium Density District).The intent of the R-3 District is to provide for the development of one-to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the City.It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of nonresidential uses. The following land uses and zoning are adjacent to the subject property: North: Single Household Residence, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) South: Single Household Residence, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) East: Multiple Household Residences, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) West: Single Household Residence, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 2 GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The subject property and the properties to the north, south, east and west are all designated as "Residential."This category designates places where the primary activity is urban density living quarters. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks,low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. The residential designation also indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal boundaries which may require annexation prior to development.The dwelling unit density expected within this classification varies.It is expected that areas of higher density housing would be likely to be located in proximity to commercial centers to facilitate the broadest range of feasible transportation options for the greatest number of individuals and support businesses within commercial centers. Low density areas should have an average minimum density of six units per net acre. Medium density areas should have an average minimum density of twelve units per net acre.High density areas should have an average minimum density of eighteen units per net acre.A variety of housing types should be blended to achieve the desired density with large areas of single type housing being discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence Df constraints and natural features such as floodplains may cause an area to be designated for development at a lower density than normally expected within this classification.All residential housing should be arranged with consideration given to the existing character of adjacent development, any natural constraints such as steep slopes,and in a fashion which advances the overall goals of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. The residential designation is intended to provide the principal locations for additional housing within the Planning Area. REVIEW CRITERIA& FINDINGS In approving a modification to a Planned Unit Development application, the City Commission shall consider the criteria outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance including Section 18.34.090"Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria;" Section 18.34.100 "City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits;"and Chapter 18.36"Planned Unit Development."Again,please note that this application does not include any changes to the streets,parks,open spaces,trails, or overall subdivision layout;therefore,many of the review criteria are non-applicable. Planning Staff has evaluated the application against the relevant review criteria that are applicable to the proposed PUD modification and offers the following summary review comments below. Section 18.34.090 "Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria" In considering applications for site plan approval under this title,the City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy Again, the property is designated as "Residential" according to the adopted growth policy. 2. Conformance to this title,including the cessation of any current violations The property owner must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code,which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. The following code provisions must be addressed with the final submittal: Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 3 a) That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. b) That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use,shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing,and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations The proposal conforms to all other applicable laws,ordinances,and regulations.All conditions for a Conditional Use Permit must be met prior to final site plan approval including the recording of the conditions for the Conditional Use Permit. The revised building permit for Lot 11 will be further evaluated against the requirements of the International Building Code at the time application is made. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property The site plan review process as well as the PUD architectural guidelines will ensure compatibility with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions The lot will still be large enough to provide required off-street parking. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress The proposed modification does not affect pedestrian and vehicular access. 7. Landscaping,including the enhancement of buildings,the appearance of vehicular use, open space, and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation Landscaping is subject to code requirements and PUD Architectural Guidelines and Covenants. 8. Open space Required open space was provided with the PUD. No additional open space is required with this modification. 9. Building location and height The new building must meet all setbacks and lot coverage requirements.The proposed PUD Modification is related to lot width and area and does not affect building locations or height. Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 4 10. Setbacks No additional setback relaxations are requested. 11. Lighting All residential lighting must meet provisions of Section 18.42.150. 12. Provisions for utilities,including efficient public services and facilities Not applicable; this was dealt with through the subdivision. 13. Site surface drainage Not applicable; site surface drainage is taken care of through the subdivision. 14. Loading and unloading areas Not applicable; there are no loading and unloading areas. 15. Grading Not applicable;none proposed. 16. Signage Not applicable;none proposed. 17. Screening Any mechanical equipment must be adequately screened as noted in the site plan code provisions. 18. Overlay district provisions Non-applicable. 19. Other related matters,including relevant comment from affected patties The Planning Office has not received any written comments in reference to this project. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 5 I I b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Non-applicable. Section 18.34.100"City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits" In addition to the review criteria outlined above,the City Commission shall,in approving a conditional use permit, find favorably as follows: I 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. The applicant representatives have studied the sites and determined that the reduced lot size will still allow a single household residence with a garage. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof. Staff does not find that the proposal will have adverse effects on abutting properties. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to: regulation of use; special yards, spaces, and buffers; special fences,solid fences and walls; Surfacing of parking areas;Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate Bonds; Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress;Regulation of signs;Requiring maintenance of the grounds; Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors;Regulation of hours for certain activities; Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; Duration of use;Requiring the dedication of access rights;Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner Staff does not find any additional conditions necessary. Section 18.36.090"Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria" In addition to the review criteria outlined for site plan and conditional use permit review, the City Commission shall,in approving a planned unit development, find favorably as follows: a. All Development.All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against, and comply with, the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory"All Development" group. 1. Does the development comply with all City design standards,requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways, Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 6 sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Non-applicable; this was addressed with the subdivision and PUD review. 2. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Non-applicable; there is no existing natural vegetation on the lots. 3. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? The proposed changes still work within the context of the overall PUD. 4. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction,orientation,and placement;transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials;and/or use of renewable energy sources;etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? This specific lot does not affect the overall PUD. 5. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? This will be addressed with a building permit. G. Park Land.Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by Section 18.50.020 "Park Requirements?" Not applicable;parkland dedications were handled with the PUD. 7. Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Nonresidential developments within the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street corridor shall earn thirty points. Points may be earned in any combination of the following. The applicant shall select the combination of methods but the City may require documentation of performance,modifications to the configuration of open space, or other assurances that the options selected shall perform adequately. Not applicable; the master plan for the overall PUD has already been approved. The proposed PUD modification does not significantly affect the PUD master. plan. The relaxation would only apply to Lot 11. 8. Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 7 • I The proposed modification does not significantly change the PUD master plan. b. Residential.Planned unit developments in residential areas(R-S,R-1,R-2,R-3,R-4, RMH and R-O zoning districts)may include a variety of housing types designed to enhance the natural environmental, conserve energy, recognize, and to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods,with provisions for a mix of limited commercial development. The subject property falls within the R-3 zone. The reduced lot width and area does not significantly affect the overall PUD. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION The Bozeman Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) have reviewed the proposed PUD modification and support the additional relaxation.Staff recommends the following condition of approval for clarification: 1. The approval for the 3,555 square foot lot shall only apply to Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development. i The Planning Staff, DRC and DRB have reviewed the proposed modification to the PUD. Planning Staff has identified various code provisions which must be met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings (see pages 4 and 5) of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance,which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.66 OF THE BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION. Attachments: DRB Memo DRB Minutes (consent item) Applicant Submittal Materials Report sent to: Paul&Melissa Cronin,PO Box 160556,Big Sky Montana, 59716 Ross McMilin,3950 Dry Creek Road,Belgrade,Montana 59714 Legends Studios,Inc.,600 North Wallace Avenue,Loft One,Bozeman MT 59715 Oakway,LLC, 2066 Stadium Drive,Suite 202,Bozeman MT 59715 Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD,#Z-06237 8 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _ r Alfred M. Stiff Professional Buildi CL LF PY one 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 SEP 2 6 2006 I ning@bozemon.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-123 v✓ww.bozeman.net t DDEEPpAtR�T�M6IENT OF PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW A rP_LI_dkylb.I�tNIIYDEVELOPMENT 7 1.Name of Project/Development: Modification to P.U.D.for lots 11 &12 of Block 5 in the Walton Homestead P.U.D. 2.Property Owner Information: Name: Paul A.&Melissa Cronin Ross McMilin /I A.I• J Mailing Address: P.O.Box 160556,Big Sky,MT 59716 3950 Dry Creek Road,Belgrade,MT 59714 Phone: 995-4136 406-624-0151 3.Applicant Informatio.n: Name: ^- ,p E-mail Address: Mailing Address: (O O 0 tA . W �`Q u v v 14�4 OvIl t Phone: "l 6 ' (9 FAX: r2 6- 1 uZ 4. Representative Information: Name: C&H Engineering and Surveying,Inc. E-mail Address: info@chengineers.com Mailing Address: 1091 Stoneridge Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 FAX: 587-9768 5.Legal Description: Lots 11 &12,Block 5,Walton Homestead P.U.D.Phase II 6.Street Address: 710 Matheson Way 7.Project Description: Relocate common boundary line between the two lots. 8.Zoning Designation(s): R-3 9.Current Land Use(s): Residential Urban 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Residential Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ - -....._..- ...................._—— _... ............... _...._._ 11. Gross Area: Acres: 0.2366 Square Feet: 10,306 F12. Net Area: Acres: 0.2366 Square Feet: 10,306 13.Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 131 Q No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor 14. Will this application require a tleviation(s)? ❑ Yes ✓❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑O.Planned Unit Development-Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands Q P.Planned Unit Development-Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development-Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/fvlodification of Plan.approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development-Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,I'UrthCt Development,Amendnient/(:(.)A ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑ U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑1.Prelirr rnary Site Plan ❑Y.Zon ng Map Amendment ❑J.Preluminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑Z.Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy lvlap.Amendment ❑lvl.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signatures) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: .`.y`—� `''- Date: .6 Applicant's Signature: tl lki� V 'i J �J; Date: i Property Owner's Signature: ��\ ti �'+ Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: 215106 Page 2 .(Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) PL-ANED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECK-.-)T The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as pan of the submittal. Any item check:d "No" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals w0be re-a=ed to the applicant. i A. ❑ Planned Unit Development-Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: r PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information ab6ut adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subjectpa'rcel of land 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing sho*- the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and other signifisaft' features on the site and within one-half mile of the site // 3. A computation tabl owing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area B. Planned Unit Development-Prelinunal Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No N/A �� •• 11 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'h-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms ff ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and ❑ ❑ directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial ❑ ❑ uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the �[]/ ❑ ❑ applicant h. Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090 (PUD Design. Objectives and Criteria),BMG The applicant shall submit written explanation. for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require,or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated J. Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) Page 3 (PUD Checklist-Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04) i PUD Preliminary Pla.,information,continued Yes No N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'h- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: k A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at Ph- by 11-inches or 11- by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening,fences,walls and other landscaping C. Attorneys or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent ❑ ❑ off-site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: a. The proposed width ❑ ❑ b. Treatment of curbs and gutters,or other storm water control system if other ❑ ❑ than curb and gutter is proposed C. Sidewalk systems ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the ❑ ❑ Cary are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following: a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 ❑ ❑ feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires planing, a preliminary subdivision plat,subject to ❑ ❑ the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the ❑ ❑ discretion of the City Engineer,a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon /10 the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses. The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 18.78.0501, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ under question,the Cry Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application Page 4 C ❑ Planned Unit Develoj._-.:nt-Final Plan. The following informatioi. .d data shall be submitted: PUD Final Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ❑ ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development 2. A final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the same scale as the approved preliminary plan.If a different scale is requested or required,a copy of the approved-." reliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan.However, only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be permitted for final plans. The final;plan site plan shall show the following information: a. Land use data(same information as required on the preliminary site plan) ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Attorneys or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ d. Planning Director certification of approval of the site plan and its ❑ ❑ ❑ conformance with the preliminary plan / e. Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions and/restrictions as set forth ❑ ❑ ❑ on the site plan 3. A final landscape plan consistent with the condit Ens and restrictions of the El ❑ m ❑ approved preliminary plan shall be subitted. It shall also be consistent with the Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except�tl'iat any stated conditions and restrictions of the preliminary plan approv�Y shall supersede the provisions of Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping),BMC 4. An official final subdivision plat of the�ite must accompany the final planned unit ❑ ❑ ❑ development plan when applicable. Cjty approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of build/ utg permits 5. Prior to submission of the final/plan to the DRC and ADR staff,engineering plans ❑ El ❑ and specifications for sewer, water, street improvements and other public improvements,and an exe5dted improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation of sucJi improvements,must be submitted to and approved by the City 6. A plan for the m tenance of open space, meeting the requirements of Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 18.72.040(Co on Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee),BMC,shall be submitted with an application for final plan approval.Open space shown on the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan Page 5 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No"or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board (DRIB)Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following. Design Review Board(DRB)Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1. 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 2. 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or ❑ industrial space 3. More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail conunercial uses, ❑ permitted service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 4. 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ 5• Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1 Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ 2. List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ❑ ❑ 3• A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will ❑ ❑ I travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid,where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4. Boundary line of property with dimensions ❑ ❑ S. Date of plan preparation and changes ❑ ❑ 6. North point indicator ❑ ❑ 7. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ 9 Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size(floor area ratio,FAR), ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ C. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ 2r 11. Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units,and total net and gross residential ❑ ❑ density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities,including circulation aisles,access drives,bicycle racks, ❑ ❑ (� compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of T employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed,and total square footage of each Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03;revised 9/22/04) General Information,continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.060.L, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless ❑ ❑ such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the ❑ ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the budding(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑ ❑ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review,a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data,onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to El ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points ❑. ❑ 5. Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site ❑ ❑ 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas ❑ ❑ C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ d. Water ❑ ❑ e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: a. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman ❑ ❑ Floodplain Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Page 4 Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos,dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc..which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) ❑ ❑ b. The downstream conditions(developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑ ❑ topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details ❑ ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, ❑ ❑ parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ 15. Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 18.52,BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas(both ❑. ❑ vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with fighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.000.R,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previously provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ 19. Landscaping-detailed plan showing plantings,equipment,and other appropriate information ❑ ❑ Q� as required in Section 18.78.100,BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If / required,complete section C below 20. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees ❑ ❑ and shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑ ❑ ,� structures or districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telepho numbers of both the ❑ ❑ ❑ property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot/� ❑ ❑ ❑ P e5 Landscape Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and'.the ❑ ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys,utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated ❑ ❑ ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer ❑ ❑ ❑ strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ .including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper musybe specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening tgbc provided in or near off-street parking ❑ ❑ ❑ and loading areas,'including information as to the amount(in square feet)of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees,(if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ ❑ ❑ damage during construction 10. Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water ❑ ❑ ❑ features 11. A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan — see Section 18.48.060, BMC (Landscape ❑ ❑ Cl Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal siorage areas ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of ex_i'sting and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for ❑ ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Size of planting's at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ ❑ 19. Areas to be iFiigated ❑ ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 18.42.100,BMC(Watercourse Setbacks),if ❑ ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not :1 ❑ ❑ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 Narrative to accompany P.U.D. Modification Checklist for all items marked No or N/A P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Information Checklist Section 1 b-f This information is not changing and shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. i-k This information is not changing and shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. j Sections 2-9 I all Ownership of lots is not changing due to the relocation of the lot boundary and the initial plan for the P.U.D. is not being modified. Site Plan Checklist Section A 1.5 We are not asking to change any of this information; it shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. Section B 3 This application is not relevant to the building of a structure. 9 This application is not relevant to the building of a structure. 10-18 We are not asking to change any of this information; it shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. Section C 1 The lots in question are existing city lots. 4 - 6 The lots in question are existing city lots. 7c No house exists on lot 11. 8-25 Lots 11 & 12 are existing single-family city lots in an existing P.U.D. L. Dale Swanson&Shayla Swanson Allison Brooke Webb Kurt A. &Melinda Winegardner 15th Ave. 1104 70 Avenue SW 731 N. 342 Gallatin Peak Dr. Calgary AB T2V OP6 Canada Bozeman, MT 59715.3237 Bozeman, MT 59715-7909 Brian&Julie Gladden Kenneth C.Webster Cory&Gretchen Higgins 1136 Camino Vallecito 3833 Happy Valley Rd. 3838 Happy Valley Rd. Lafayette, CA 94549-2813 Lafayette, CA 94549-2425 Lafayette, CA 94549-2425 Mark Tippett Steve Hangartner& Jane Crites&Michael F.Wilson Callie M. Glanzer 786 N. 15"Ave. Luis Perez 768 N. 15"Ave. Bozeman,MT 59715-3235 1627 W. Main St. PMB 263 Bozeman, MT 59715-3235 Bozeman, MT 59715-4011 Saam Real Estate Marvin D. Mortenstein 7177 jade Hill Ln. Ann Van Balen. . Bozeman, MT 59715-8398 77 Northview Ridge Ln. Bozeman, MT 59715-7805 In z 2 SI 15 14 15 2 E25' -if v 0 &3 a s'A vk Y, k T =* -- 0 6:13 7c, 5 ZI gc < .oar a h! trl Ps bi 0 I.'2 > z Ll x P u ly.-123 z Z44 ry z It 2 6 1 gs Lj f� lX4 L I E S.i � 2 2 FEE q 114, 2's '21 U C4 LA C) Cl- e, u.j ......... .......... 0. F— tl�R u0sallp)m VA A -Z- XXX Q) -'T Uj Q)O nx r#,.,-:"o-CoW; "A.q I, o.m I anuaay y4gi ypoy Z' T 1Q cl 83 0 oj 9 .Uj 0 0 Lb 111� SEp ��11 U DEPAr`raE.� September 25, 2006 weuiPMENT Narrative to accompany application for P.U.D. modification for Lots 11 and 12 in Block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. The house at 710 North 15`h Street was initially owned and built by Structura, LLC. and then sold to Packy and Melissa Cronin. This application for P.U.D. modification is made by Becki D. Miller and Kira E. Cey of Structura, LLC. upon the discovery that the house at 712 North 15`h Street is located 2'-6" into the North side setback. The discovery of the house's current location was made when the adjacent property owner, Ross McMilin,was locating a proposed house to be built on his lot 11,block 5. Upon locating his proposed house, he observed that the property pin for his Southeast corner and lot 12's northeast corner was missing. This may have been the reason for the house on lot 12,being located where it is currently. I Upon his observation, Rocky Mountain Engineers was hired to locate the missing pin and verify the correct location of the property pins for lots 10, 11, and 12 on block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. After locating all of the property pins, it was discov:red that the house on lot 12 was in fact 2'-6" into the north side setback at the northeast corner of the house. However, no other setbacks on this lot were affected by the incorrect location of the house. The house-is still fully on its lot. It is our best estimate that this error was made at the time of siting, excavation cr pouring foundation, due to the missing northeast property pin. It is our assumption that the location of this property corner, in the absence of the pin,was measured incorrectly thus, the placement of the house does not correlate with what was originally drawn on the site plan. There is no reason that the house would need to project into the setbacks as it would have fit well within the setbacks and is frankly a mistake in siting and locating the house. Once this discovery was made a meeting occurred to discuss how the owner of lot 11(Ross McMilin)and Susan Kozub of the City of Bozeman Planning Department,would like to proceed. At this meeting, it was decide that an application for P.U.D. modification would be made to adjust the current common property line between lots 11 & 12. This application requests that the common property line be shifted 2'-6" to the north to maintain a perpendicular property line with a 5'side setback from the house on lot 12. This will decrease the size of lot 11 from 3800 s.f.which is the minimum size allowed by the Walton Homestead P.U.D., to 3,555 s.f. The width of the lot would also be decreased to 37'-6" as apposed to 40'-0" that is the minimum width allowed in this P.U.D. AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK S, WAL TON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.U.D., PHASE 1 SURVEY 1-rOLES7-O BY OWERS TC REt.00AT-L TT?E COus10N LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF SEC. 1, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. BCUNDART BETWE N 2 F.XiS?N111 i.OTS V4TH1A1 A PLATTED A76 EXELlPT F•RG`A REYE:y as A sTsnt�ccN'U1 OF P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PURSUAA!�:�'i0 76-3-20'/;T);d)M.C.A. OWNER!AT 1[: ?Alit. A CRONN AND\SE!!SSA CR(WN CERTI=;C.AT= Of- CONSE^•:T ane C_ERn FiCATE OP EXEtv-PTION_ -_-Lb u _--rd P:W:,o»t e,do h-ay c WY ti a a Mvu c .td to-a--ry eU,-wud\i.'!OO onU ^,EGA R5F UuC,!\\,. 220:5a,',.0 .0cil-IT" MAP w t t .,a dwa 0. w au ay Afcva!.,I at[„s,,:,e. »n b,tLi.;.al nm<n:au frt,!aeed.•.,.fre,.h:y c.ewl d Leat of mna,la OWN(:f'LOT 1?. '7C'i5 4cht!L!N _ v . -.CF.f_ DESCR:F'E'i0^u 4 1; r ( --''t1W e.M Lot:2,OirR S.x'ALTOY HOVE'TEAV Si:PDf\tSiJtt.!'ti.v.,i"Y'SE i, wr:y to L^o pplat!Mesa,, ,I!L a:d o r wd;n lee d!!ce of a'. d korardor.GUEialin Count/.Muntanc.a..16d in the SaW.em:a a+te!of '� • ."ov-,."^-u t^..?On'e!er n of_1i_V .. Auo-10.2 C soawt 1W,0.2306—or 957.5 sa;."meter.. 5vb n:t to.*.d::g w.tn\.nte. (T) RECO:•.D DiSTANC; -)R A':'.!WJ!H rf• tr:s W,,-- • -::hc0 act of Ia;0 b• »: dmlyna!,d oe klicKEO PLAT CF LOTS 11 ANC 12.DL;X_K 5. V'.VTO::KNFS cA0 S-MU&QH,PA-M.,P!RSF 1.Cal.1;n C<•,rty,tl0r:tano. (M) VEASURLC GiSTANCE OR A?;6TU'i4 • C ERT'I FICAT= UF" EXE-M PTION (90IINi:ARY REUk;ATEOfi) .!'lJ\S:!: Clime (R..H, CENTER 565 SES) •� y,e Cert:i,loot!Ita_mma of!W.mrvey h to se!uea!e lha ea'nmon baunaarite LrAwaem 2 o.Es9:,q iota x!tP!n a 9WI.d aad t•mt Wa ex.:•rot'a earePtin.i.U:ml<arae!Y>ta!m?u,ef an R.wa. :n<,eiere Nit •v,ry a.r-?t SET 5/8 INCH RERNR YA':-i 1 1/4 INCHxandi&!on P\rce�nn!to 5-Ow 76-7-207 011(d)�WC.A,and!1:o Eazercn u:,:4ed Oew!oam<nt 0.,Ta-ce,em. a ^'v\$TiG GAF' MAR:rEO �Cd�Ei P951S$$j / TF.b sor\•</!a VutR•al!Yo.n W.I.try Lns.4ontav Copwiment of Ennm,mend 01a7y 0ur'sac04 to A.R.U.I7.J5.911.'.(2i10). BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FP.C:! NORRT: THE SO- iit)•E OF'LOT 12, / . 9!.00F: 5, WALION HCNESTCAO SUBDNIISION, P.A$E !. BE NG Dotal this_— day of 20W. 270.00'00" au:v A�wa7,b t7 :— r0N45'C0'C0"Ei DEARNO CG!nPirTEO rr,\:tt AZ�M:'T1! S!iCiYiiJ ' ' / C:A!E OF(;k,LW --_�' COU:i?Y Or fJ..:n^� 0"L,!s_ _auy of tSo yaw•2W6,I ew.me.tre and-Ip d,a W."),No:;-far j l L'.Sle:e o'.l-.W c•, re: .1.41 appawtaf P-,:I A Cra•,in ona A:,(,o G!a.^.1".-.n ne to Ee , 1 go,a vhaat•nmrea re c,b-faced 1a L e.thin in,lfumen;w x nuw!eayea b-lnct ln.y a.sited �X., K } fh o m,.!n v:v:.n,vc eN.!icv I -to e,.a:y ta-d crkt oIli-f w-y orfcio!xeai iD<day o.?nytw (— LO fist ubo.v:tu u t 0 CAn'Y A.R.Rl;'P •e:!ding,t 22idagt LO 1 7 AG�d4T PiB:3C M r' ^TA.: 0r MGVTMA TFAST] xxx P::n1cd No- ^z ( (R:cM!)f,,0�•\7'(?;;" li, A:;,n,.I xxx my ca.n.w.n s.a:rw y:,04 !100 1 W.C. I Ln _ r`Od•r00:bt. Da3W S• day Or��2G^..5. P9 LOT 11 �— w p'r. 3.555 Sq c, ' h i<' U1�•�` JN�\�.E OF ?).D!?16 AC!e •�v ^1A.fE CF M'ti\?wiw "•s•�, Ex..A$T] Gn L'ds_ day of--__--I.,t' y 2006.Wwo me,V:e nd-;good,o.Votary Public!w C l OOC?COO^ xi- ^ :b Sftll<of Maata.",a TPaI.-ty aPPrA.,R-tht W*a,itnoer'a me-a La:a0 pmwI+t.•us<--tx wn L -• Nev 9ewy Ua,, 54.98 (:au I,W.�:. sd..rred to!ba.n a i,tame, ad acx,a.?caged fa a t:,c:Me—at"I",.. 'r _ re f,1 have hw BA my nand w,d aff:.taa m,,atlicnl-1 V.coy cod yaw III!Z ,wimoat. ! fn„d y?��29 4)Wndafy f.v10 F•.d s•�-.. ! ,f,..l CLOJa WKlN,. LOT 1T SNOW � r,"n a. �•-• SNOW R*CE PROPERTIES.L.L.C. r:O,pF!Pi19tdC rOR rr S• 0("W,A•N 0 LOT 12 7.16a791 w 6.75t Sq Ft I r o I P,:nted r;emc:� to,amlla,wt C c:i=CT:F-!GATE O'R SuR\.rF_YOR ] ( C.."101or,Praft0;w..t F,4fnctr aM Lar:d Survtyw ttu.MKS,d0 hc-j 'C fy that T;1T"c"Ac ts:t '20 I( :V:c.16 and.,eat.__,_.06.t1:,tuner^a mca<:,:Mnr m ,rct c� an.and! .wa Pu!laa the c•;n<as sown a^.!hx x wnDan ng P!.N�ona oa des.:ribed�'Jn occor\'lanca w!h:S P'aricions or s N ( Lha MCntnaa Sux:sie!w:Cad P Act,S-C.-76-.1-'01 th:ouyh lhrovin 7fi-3-625.N.CA.,ox /) 0 ` i0'11tiii!y t:sort:a:\.-^I! � f ! / \� U:u F?o:nma::W::'ed;Sevt.•Uarc»l O,dinaa-.c fty1d.50 77.4C i -. L-3.00- 2'70'o0.00L Dot.lhu__day o1...— .2ooe. ---.-._-_ � A.-1•s:'15^ TvTEST] -t+a'.,�chanM1:or o Mae Street n Mw,!ana Rtgf,".W. 95,eus Senile ht Feet 7, I !roth-PwtoraanT iuegv e!uroPafmc ttc.ln,at fa,M:,.+IsCio!:ny an a 3l0aenimnn, hm6; 4 !n,t L\a asd .mP:i-cal,.td 3 !y vd w,x!ja Een30 O 0 <fo_ ofo !,tha v A. Of e!. a.,4.CA.cU tho&romn 9W G!rfiw:wa 9 O LOT Dd!ed --aay a1 caNato- Slt ht Direc r,city LOT xxx ty o1 dczan:an..-awl. n !r') ! XxX X% X)iX CI=R'I E!CP:fE Ur_COV NTY_-"R:JaSUREFt_ %xxG K 0 x !.<mha•i7 euehaxn.7rtac.r!d of.!W t..Ca dy,MCn:O.ea,do::<rtEy.--,Iy::^.a e«.mpc,.-n "I has:we.^.du!y a mind and that al rea:ProPe,fy:o\.sn crn etltc!OI wsasaren\s'ss.ta,ad a.!:t\C^.d an zh.;and 10 at,saoaiSd,a have b-Paid. J e »DaNd th:a--_aay of_—,M.-J. ey:.v_De_y-_�___— Pu1Y Treasurer ow Galblin CcuMy 1!, 4 C�_ERKTAND REC.ORDE:R i t She!kl'Jn.^.e,Ckr:o:d R<Ce of daft u.n C mty Llor.lo^q do:-ty-fi y L,al;no! uirq G\c&h\CAD\CMogo.,]pg a --- in 0.9,.<m uca ivied i,Do a:/ku Ct_.__o e:.x>.__.M.lh:e_,—day Of 2GG9,Ccd r.rordad tr.9ac\ P recora,DS 0,e Cierk and 0-ty C,cr.Cno Hecwde' 1�:)6.t'i5/(A�) CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 " P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board (DRB) FROM: Susan Kozub,Associate Planner DATE: Consent Agenda for 10/25/06 DRB Meeting RE: Walton Homestead (Lot 11, Block 5) CUP to Modify PUD 2, #Z-06237 Property Location: The proposed PUD Modification would only apply to property located at 718 North 15`h Avenue and legally described as Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. This property is zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) and is designated as "Residential" on the Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. Please refer to the following map: R=3 Subject Property m > Q t W) Mae St T- Z A Proposal: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application has been submitted that would allow a modification to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) with expanded relaxations. The original Walton Homestead PUD was approved by the City Commission in April of 2003 including relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single household detached residential dwelling units to be constructed on 3,800 square foot lots (smaller than the normal requirement of 5,000 square feet) with lot widths of 40 feet (10 feet less than the standard 50 foot lot width requirement). Due to a surveying/construction error on Lot 12 to the south, the owners and applicants of both lots are now requesting that Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development be permitted to have an even smaller lot area (3,555 square feet) and.lot width (37.4 feet) for a new single household detached dwelling unit. This will allow both units to maintain five foot side yard setbacks. planning . zoning . subdivision review . annexation . historic preservation . housing . grant administration . neighborhood coordination i i Minor changes to PUDs can be approved administratively; however, because the proposed change includes expanded zoning relaxations, the application must follow the same Planned Unit Development review and public hearing process required for approval of preliminary plans,which includes DRB review. This item has been scheduled as a consent item before the Design Review Board. If the Board wishes to discuss this item, then a motion must be made to remove the item from consent for further discussion. The recommendations of both the DRB and the Development Review Committee (DRC) will be forwarded to the City Commission for the public hearing which is scheduled for November 11, 2006. Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the expanded relaxations for lot area and width for Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana because it corrects a surveying/construction mistake while staying within an appropriate scale for the overall development. Lot coverage and setbacks would still be required to be maintained. Staff also feels that the strict architectural PUD guidelines will ensure compatibility with this growing neighborhood. Memo Mailed To: Paul&Melissa Cronin,PO Box 160556,Big Sky Montana, 59716 Ross McMilin, 3950 Dry Creek Road,Belgrade,Montana 59714 Legends Studios, Inc., 600 North Wallace Avenue, Loft One,Bozeman MT 59715 Oakway,LLC, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 202,Bozeman MT 59715 i Page 2 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2006 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Chairperson Livingston called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. and directed the secretary to record the attendance. Members Present Staff Present Joe Batcheller Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Christopher Livingston Lanette Windemaker, Contract Planner Michael .Pentecost Martin Knight, Assistant Planner Tara Hastie,Recording Secretary Visitors Present Shelly Engler Jerry Perkins Ray Johnson R.M. Short Lee oldenburger Jeff Sandholm Thomas Bitnar Keith Belden Molly Skorpik ITEM 2. MINUTES OF OCTOBER 11,2006. Chairperson Livingston stated that on page 4,the statement should read that Chairperson Livingston had stated he thought the single level unit should be two stories and Vice Chairperson Pentecost had disagreed with Chairperson Livingston as he thought the one story unit was more appropriate and it would prevent the creation of a wall in that location. INFORMAL RECOMMENDATION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost recommended,Mr. Batcheller seconded,to approve-the minutes of October-1 1, 2006 with corrections. The motion carried 3-0. ITEM 3. CONSENT ITEM 1. Walton Homestead Lot 11 CUP for PUD#Z-06237 (Kozub) 710 Matheson Way * A Conditional Use Permit Application for modifications to En approved Planned Unit Development to allow the relocation of a common boundary resulting in a smaller lot width and area than normally permitted under the PUD. INFORMAL RECOMMENDATION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost recommended,.Mr. Batcheller seconded,to forward a recommendation of approval for Walton Homestead Lot 11 CUP for PUD#Z-06237. The recommendation carried 3-0. Design Review Board Minutes-October 25,2006 1 i • 1 CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FILE NU OZ--06237 a WALTON HOMESTEAD PUD MAJOR MODIFICATION II ITEM: Conditional Use Permit Application #Z-06237 to modify an approved Planned Unit Development(PUD)with an additional lot area and width zoning relaxation for Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD,City of Bozeman,Gallatin County, Montana PROPERTY OWNERS: Lot 11 Lot 12 Ross McMilin Paul& Melissa Cronin 3950 Dry Creek Road PO Box 160556 Belgrade, Montana 59714 Big Sky Montana, 59716 APPLICANT: Legends Studios, Inc. 600 North Wallace Avenue, Loft One Bozeman MT 59715 REPRESENTATIVE: C&H Engineering, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman MT 59718 DATE/TIME: City Commission 7 pm on Monday, November 13, 2006 in the Community Meeting Room, Gallatin County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. REPORT BY: Susan Kozub,Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Conditional Approval I PROTECT LOCATION The proposed PUD Modification would only apply to property located at 718 North 15,h Avenue and legally described as Lot 11,Block 5,Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD,City of Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana.This property is zoned R-3(Residential Medium Density District)and is designated as "Residential" on the Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan.Please refer to the following map: Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification II CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 1 I ............._..........._.......... ............: ffzl Subject Property ._......................._.._ .........._... a> iv Q t Mae St Z PROPOSAL A Conditional Use Permit(CUP) application has been submitted that would allow a modification to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD): with expanded relaxations. The original Walton Homestead PUD was approved by the City Commission in April of 2003 including relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single household detached residential dwelling units to be constructed on 3,800 square foot lots (smaller than the normal.requirement of 5,000 square feet)with lot widths of 40 feet (10 feet less than the standard 50 foot lot width requirement). Due to a surveying/construction error on Lot 12 to the south, the owners and applicants of both lots are now requesting that Lot 11, Block 5,Walton Homestead Planned Unit=inglc ent be permitted to have an even smaller lot area (3,555 square feet)and lot width(37.4 feet), household detached dwelling unit.This will allow both units to maintain standard five foot side yard setbacks. Minor changes to PUDs can be approved administratively; however, because the proposed change includes expanded zoning relaxations,the application must follow the same Planned Unit Development review and public hearing process required for approval of preliminary plans. On October 25,2006, the Design Review Board (DRB) and Development Review Committee (DRC) voted to conditionally approve the PUD modification request. ADJACENT LAND USES &ZONING The subject property is zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District).The intent of the R-3 District is to provide for the development of one-to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the City.It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of nonresidential uses. The following land uses and zoning are adjacent to the subject property: North: Single Household Residence, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) South: Single Hous ehold Residence, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) East: Multiple Household Residences, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) West: Single Household Residence, zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 2 • • GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The subject property and the properties to the north, south, east and west are all designated as "Residential."This category designates places where the primary activity is urban density living quarters. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks,low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. The residential designation also indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal boundaries which may require annexation prior to development.The dwelling unit density expected within this classification varies. It is expected that areas of higher density housing would be likely to be located in proximity to commercial centers to facilitate the broadest range of feasible transportation options for the greatest number of individuals and support businesses within commercial centers. Low density areas should have an average minimum density of six units per net acre. Medium density areas should have an average minimum density of twelve units per net acre. High density areas should have an average minimum density of eighteen units per net acre.A variety of housing types should be blended to achieve the desired density with large areas of single type housing being discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence of constraints and natural features such as floodplains may cause an area to be designated for development at a lower density than normally expected within this classification.All residential housing should be arranged with consideration given to the existing character of adjacent development, any natural constraints such as steep slopes,and in a fashion which advances the overall goals of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. The residential designation is intended to provide the principal locations for additional housing within the Planning Area. REVIEW CRITERIA& FINDINGS In approving a modification to a Planned Unit Development application, the City Commission shall consider the criteria outlined in the Unified Development Ordinance including Section 18.34.090"Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria;" Section 18.34.100 "City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits;"and Chapter 18.36"Planned Unit Development."Again,please note that this application does not include any changes to the streets,parks,open spaces,trails, or overall subdivision layout;therefore,many of the review criteria are non-applicable. Planning Staff has evaluated the application against the relevant review criteria that are applicable to the proposed PUD modification and offers the following summary review comments below. Section 18.34.090 "Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria" In considering applications for site plan approval under this title,the City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy Again, the property is designated as "Residential' according to the adopted growth policy. 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations The property owner must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code,which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. The following code provisions must be addressed with the final submittal: Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 3 0 • a) That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. b) That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use,shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing,and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations The proposal conforms to all other applicable laws,ordinances,and regulations.All conditions for a Conditional Use Permit must be met prior to final site plan approval including the recording of the conditions for the Conditional Use Permit. The revised building permit for Lot 11 will be further evaluated against the requirements of the International Building Code at the time application is made. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property i The site plan review process as well as the PUD architectural guidelines will ensure compatibility with the surrounding properties and neighborhood. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions The lot will still be large enough to provide required off-street parking. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress The proposed modification does not affect pedestrian and vehicular access. 7. Landscaping,including the enhancement of buildings,the appearance of vehicular use, open space, and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation Landscaping is subject to code requirements and PUD Architectural Guidelines and Covenants. 8. Open space Required open space was provided with the PUD. No additional open space is required with this modification. 9. Building location and height The new building must meet all setbacks and lot coverage requirements. The proposed PUD Modification is related to lot width and area and does not affect building locations or height. Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 4 10. Setbacks No additional setback relaxations are requested. 11. Lighting All residential lighting must meet provisions of Section 18.42.150. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities Not applicable; this was dealt with through the subdivision. 13. Site surface drainage Not applicable; site surface drainage is taken care of through the subdivision. 14. Loading and unloading areas Not applicable; there are no loading and unloading areas. 15. Grading Not applicable; none proposed. 16. Signage :' • y Not applicable; none proposed. 17. Screening Any mechanical equipment must be adequately screened as noted in the site plan code provisions. 18. Overlay district provisions Non-applicable. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parries The Planning Office has not received any written comments in reference to this project. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a parry so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 5 • • Non-applicable. Section 18.34.100"City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits" In addition to the review criteria outlined above,the City Commission shall,in approving a conditional use permit, find favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. The applicant representatives have studied the sites and determined that the reduced lot size will still allow a single household residence with a garage. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof. Staff does not find that the proposal will have adverse effects on abutting properties. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to: regulation of use; special yards, spaces, and buffers; special fences, solid fences and walls; Surfacing of parking areas;Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate Bonds; Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress;Regulation of signs;Requiring maintenance of the grounds; Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors; Regulation of hours for certain activities; Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; Duration of use;Requiring the dedication of access rights;Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner Staff does not find any additional conditions necessary. Section 18.36.090 "Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria" In addition to the review criteria outlined for site plan and conditional use permit review, the City Commission shall,in approving a planned unit development, find favorably as follows: a. All Development.All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against, and comply with, the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory "All Development" group. 1. Does the development comply with all City design standards,requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways, sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Non-applicable; this was addressed with the subdivision and PUD review. Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 6 2. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Non-applicable; there is no existing natural vegetation on the lots. 3. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? The proposed changes still work within the context of the overall PUD. 4. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction,orientation,and placement;transportation networks;selection and placement of landscape materials;and/or use of renewable energy sources;etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? This specific lot does not affect the overall PUD. 5. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? This will be addressed with a building permit. 6. Park Land.Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by Section 18.50.020 "Park Requirements?" Not applicable;parkland dedications were handled with the PUD. 7. Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Nonresidential developments within the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street corridor shall earn thirty points. Points may be earned in any combination of the following. The applicant shall select the combination of methods but the City may require documentation of performance,modifications to the configuration of open space, or other assurances that the options selected shall perform adequately. Not applicable; the master plan for the overall PUD has already been approved. The proposed PUD modification does not significantly affect the PUD master plan. The relaxation would only apply to Lot 11. 8. Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The proposed modification does not significantly change the PUD master plan. Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 7 b. Residential. Planned unit developments in residential areas (R-S, R-1,R-2,R-3,R-4, RMH and R-O zoning districts) may include a variety of housing types designed to enhance the natural environmental, conserve energy, recognize, and to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods,with provisions for a mix of limited commercial development. The subject property falls within the R-3 zone. The reduced lot width and area does not significantly affect the overall PUD. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION The Bozeman Development Review Committee (DRC) and the Design Review Board (DRB) have reviewed the proposed PUD modification and support the additional relaxation.Staff recommends the following condition of approval for clarification: 1. The approval for the 3,555 square foot lot shall only apply to Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development. The Planning Staff, DRC and DRB have reviewed the proposed modification to Ene PUD. Planning Staff has identified various code provisions which must be met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings (see pages 4 and 5) of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver . or.other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. i THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.66 OF THE BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT` ORDINANCE MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION. Attachments: DRB Memo DRB Minutes (consent item) Applicant Submittal Materials Report sent to: Paul&Melissa Cronin,PO Box 160556, Big Sky Montana, 59716 Ross McMilin, 3950 Dry Creek Road,Belgrade, Montana 59714 Legends Studios,Inc., 600 North Wallace Avenue,Loft One,Bozeman MT 59715 Oakway,LLC, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 202,Bozeman MT 59715 Walton Homestead PUD Major Modification 11 CUP/PUD, #Z-06237 8 P� Walton Homestead Lots 11 & 12 CUP for PUD Mods #Z-06237 (SK) Paul &Melissa Cronin n S Y- 0Wk b ( Y) C P.O. Box 160556 W°J Big Sky, MT 59716 bop N • V� a�IQ�C A'� �� Ross McMilin 3950 Dry Creek Rd. Belgrade, MT 59714 C&H Engineering & Surveying 1091 Stoneridge Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718 Imp'ressidn`antibourrage et a sechage rapide www.avery.com I ® AVERY® 5160® Wilisez le gabarit 51600 1-800-GO-AVERY I Gaul& Melissa Cronin ?.0. Box 160556 eig Sky, MT 59716 I I �I I I Paul & Melissa Cronin I Paul &Melissa Cronin I ?.0. Box 160556 1 P.O. Box 160556 1 dig Sky, MT 59716 Big Sky, MT 59716 toss McMilin I Ross McMilin 1 4950 Dry Creek Rd. 3950 Dry Creek Rd. 1 Belgrade, MT 59714 Belgrade,MT 59714 1 I I I doss McMilin C&H Engineering & Surveying 3950 Dry Creek Rd. i 1091 Stoneridge Dr. ; Belgrade, MT 59714 Bozeman, MT 59718 1 I 1 , I I C&H Engineering & Surveying ; C&H Engineering & Surveying I 1091 Stoneridge Dr. 1 1091 Stoneridge Dr. 1 Bozeman, MT`59718 �'Bozeman, MT 59718 1 _ I I °� • • o� I �v �v �v �u Impression antibourrage et a s6chage rapide o www.avery.com i a AVERY@ 51600 Utilisez le gabarit 5160® 1-800-GO-AVERY Legends Studio Inc. Legends Studio Inca Legends Studio, Inc. 600 N. Wallace Ave., Loft 1 600 N. Wallace Ave., Loft 1 600 N. Wallace Ave:, Loft 1 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bozeman, MT 59715 1 � i I Legends Studio, Inc. I 600 N. Wallace Ave., Loft 1 I t Bozeman, MT 59715 I I I I I I i i I I I f '� i I � � • �u �u �u DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ''' "� •""': WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2006 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Chairperson Livingston called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. and directed the secretary to record the attendance. Members Present Staff Present Joe Batcheller Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Christopher Livingston Lanette Windemaker, Contract Planner Michael Pentecost Martin Knight, Assistant Planner Tara Hastie, Recording Secretary Visitors Present Shelly Engler Jerry Perkins Ray Johnson R.M. Short Lee oldenburger Jeff Sandholm Thomas Bitnar Keith Belden Molly Skorpik ITEM 2. MINUTES OF OCTOBER 11, 2006. _ Chairperson Livingston stated that on page 4, the statement should read that Chairperson Livingston had stated he thought the single level unit should be two stories and Vice Chairperson Pentecost had disagreed with Chairperson Livingston as he thought the one story unit was more appropriate and it would prevent the creation of a wall in that location. INFORMAL RECOMMENDATION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost recommended, Mr. Batcheller seconded, to-approve-the-mi-nutes.of October 11, 2006-with.corrections. The motion carried 3-0. ITEM 3. CONSENT ITEM 1. Walton Homestead Lot 11 CUP for PUD #Z-06237 (Kozub) 710 Matheson Way * A Conditional Use Permit Application for modifications to an approved Planned Unit Development to allow the relocation of a common boundary resulting in a smaller lot width and area than normally permitted under the PUD. INFORMAL RECOMMENDATION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost recommended, Mr. Batcheller seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval for Walton Homestead Lot 11 CUP for PUD #Z-06237. The recommendation carried 3-0. Design Review Board Minutes-October 25,2006 1 PRr—"L1MH'\c1.ARY ITEM 4. PROJECT REVIEW 2. Bank of Bozeman Preliminary SP/COA, #Z-06215 (Krueger) 875 Harmon Street Blvd. * A Preliminary Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of an 8,833 sq. foot bank with an additional 650 square foot drive up facility on separate lots with related site improvements, zoned B-2 (Community Business) District. (Continued from October 11, 2006.) Richard Shanahan and Lowell Springer joined the DRB. Associate Planner Brian Krueger presented the Staff Report noting the DRB had seen the project on September 27, 2006 and explained what the DRB had requested at that review. He stated the applicant had revised the drawings to be more consistent and Staff recommendations for the proposal would stand as presented. He stated there had not been an updated elevation submitted for the proposed drive- thru. Mr. Shanahan added that the drive-thru had not been modified. Mr. Springer added that the drive-thru would match the proposed bank exactly. Planner Krueger stated Staff would need to see the drive-thru before the Planning Director Staff report was due. Mr. Springer stated some of the DRB comments did not jive and the applicant had made changes based on what would be best for the proposed bank. He stated the stone height around the windows had been lowered and they were ready to incorporate all the suggested site changes. Mr. Shanahan added that he had asked if the applicant should make the site changes to the plans at the last meeting of the DRB and Planner Krueger had told him he would not need to. Mr. Springer stated they had taken Ms. Zavora's comments and incorporated them on the site plan and they had no problems with any of Staff or DRB comments. Vice Chairperson Pentecost asked if there was a column layer problem with the elevations. Mr. Springer responded they did have a layer problem. Vice Chairperson Pentecost asked if the area labeled stone had been incorrectly labeled. Mr. Springer responded that it had. Mr. Pentecost stated he would prefer to see the entryway composed of brick rather than stone. INFORMAL RECOMMENDATION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost recommended, Mr. Batcheller seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to the Planning Director for the -Bank-of Bozeman Preliminary SP/COA, #Z-0621-5 with Staff-conditions.and the.addition-of condition#9 that the elevations be updated to match the information on the renderings; particularly that the entry be shown as brick instead of stone and match the provided elevations. The recommendation carried 3-0. Mr. Batcheller asked what caused the applicant to decide on the copper color. Mr. Springer responded that the DRB had been in twain on the preferred color and the applicant did not want to make the structure half black and half copper. Chairperson Livingston read Ms. Zavora's comments from a prior e-mail to the DRB members in her absence. Mr. Springer responded that the requirements addressed by Ms. Zavora had been met by City Standards and added that he had done what she had asked. Chairperson Livingston stated he agreed with Vice Chairperson Pentecost and would like to see the entryway be brick instead of stone. Design Review Board Minutes-October 25,2006 2 CI1DDF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CC)N{MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Board (DRB) FROM: Susan Kozub,Associate Planner DATE: Consent Agenda for 10/25/06 DRB Meeting RE: Walton Homestead (Lot 11, Block 5) CUP to Modify PUD 2, #Z-06237 Property Location: The proposed PUD Modification would only apply to property located at 718 North 15t'Avenue and legally described as Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. This property is zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) and is designated as "Residential" on the Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. Please refer to the following map: I -:3 Subject Property a� d Q un Mae St Z Proposal: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application has been submitted that would allow a modification to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) with expanded relaxations. The original. Walton Homestead PUD was approved by the City Commission in April of 2003 including relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single household detached residential dwelling units to be constructed on 3,800 square foot lots (smaller than the normal requirement of 5,000 square feet) with lot widths of 40 feet (10 feet less than the standard 50 foot lot width requirement). Due to a surveying/construction error on Lot 12 to the south, the owners and applicants of both lots are now requesting that Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development be permitted to have an even smaller lot area (3,555 square feet) and lot width (37.4 feet) for a new single household detached dwelling unit. This will allow both units to maintain five foot side yard setbacks. planning • zoning . subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination Minor changes to PUDs can be approved administratively; however, because the proposed change includes expanded zoning relaxations, the application must follow the same Planned Unit Development review and public hearing process required for approval of preliminary plans,which includes DRB review. This item has been scheduled as a consent item before the Design Review Board. If the Board wishes to discuss this item, then a motion must be made to remove the item from consent for further discussion. The recommendations of both the DRB and the Development Review Committee (DRC) will be forwarded to the City Commission for the public hearing which is scheduled for November 11, 2006. Staff Recommendation: i Staff supports the expanded relaxations for lot area and width for Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana because it corrects a surveying/construction mistake while staying within an appropriate scale for the overall development. Lot coverage and setbacks would still be required to be maintained. Staff also feels that the strict architectural PUD guidelines will ensure compatibility with this growing neighborhood. Memo Mailed To: Paul&Melissa Cronin,PO Box 160556,Big Sky Montana, 59716 Ross McMilin, 3950 Dry Creek Road,Belgrade, Montana 59714 Legends Studios, Inc., 600 North Wallace Avenue,Loft One, Bozeman MT 59715 Oakway,LLC, 2066 Stadium Drive, Suite 202,Bozeman MT 59715 Page 2 CI'WF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a! Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM TO: Development Review Committee FROM: Susan Kozub,Associate Planner DATE: October 25, 2006 RE: Walton Homestead Modification to PUD 2, #Z-06237 Planning Staff recommends the following conditions of approval for the above referenced projects. The applicant must comply with all code provisions of the UDO, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Conditions of Apt2roval: 1. The approval for the 3,555 square foot lot shall only apply to Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development. UDO Code Provisions: a) That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure. b) That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. planning • zoning . subdivision review . annexation . historic preservation • housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination 130 OF BOZEMAN AEARTMENT OF PLANNING AND AMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT hone 406-582-2260 Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2263 �! 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MODIFY A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application has been submitted that would allow a modification to an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) with expanded relaxations. The original Walton Homestead PUD was approved with relaxations from Section 18.16.040 to allow single household detached residential dwelling units to be constructed on 3,800 square foot lots (smaller than the normal requirement of 5,000 square feet) with lot widths of 40 feet (10 feet less than the standard 50 foot lot width requirement). Due to a surveying/construction error on Lot 12 to the south, the owners and applicants of both lots are requesting that Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Planned Unit Development be permitted to have an even smaller lot area (3,555 square feet) and lot width (37.4 feet) for a new single household detached dwelling unit. This will allow both units to maintain five foot side yard setbacks. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the CUP/PUD Modification Application as submitted by the property owners, Paul & Melissa Cronin, PO Box 160556, Big Sky Montana, 59716 and Ross McMilin, 3950 Dry Creek Road, Belgrade, Montana 59714, and the applicants, Legends Studios, Inc., 600 North Wallace Avenue, Loft One, Bozeman MT 59715, pursuant to the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The property is located at 710 North 15`h Avenue and is legally described as Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead Subdivision PUD, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The zoning designation for said property is R-3 (Residential Medium Density District). PUBLIC MEETING Bozeman City Commission Monday,11/13/06 6pm Community Meeting Room Third Floor Gallatin County Courthouse 311 West Main Street Bozeman,Montana The City invites the public to comment in writing and attend public hearings. Written comments may be directed to the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, P. O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and related data regarding this application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). Walton Homestead Lot 11 Modification to PUD 2, #Z-06237 planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination a R-3� Subject ' Property a� a n Mae St T Page 2 qLELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTP MEETING REVIEW SHEET Date: 10 a5 10 6 Project Name: \A 0.A"r NO 1 Wf IM A S Prepared by: $ria try 4r 9-y9um File # Owners/Applicants/Representatives Present: DRC Members Present: n 2 St'od a l 0� Project Engineer Tl John Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent II John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent II Greg Megaard, Assist. Dir. Public Safety/Inspections -33 Dave Skelton, Senior Planner II Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official Z Ron Dingman, Parks Superintendent IJ Meeting Notes: DRC of OVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTA MEETING REVIEW SHEET Date: (0 l .� d Project Name: lA Paru"( I A ge. ! o C Prepared by: SUS0.V1 KQZkb File # 2 - Q6 13-7 Owners/Applicants/Representatives Pr sent: DRC ember Pre41,sent: Project Engineer II John Alston, ater Sewer Superintendent John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Greg Megaard, Assist. Dir. Public Safety/Inspections Dave Skelton, Senior Planner Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official Ron CDingman, Parks Superintendent !k Meeting Notes: S 1� • i V1 1 " O Y DRC of .......... O C .O Q (D (D N 15th Ave rt ((D alley rt z �I CIS OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 " P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net October 4, 2006 Legends Studio, Inc. 600 North Wallace Avenue, Loft One Bozeman NIT 59715 RE: Lot 11, Block 5, Walton Homestead PUD Modifications, #Z-06237 Dear Becky & Kira: The above-referenced PUD modification application was received on September 26, 2006 which meets d-ie Tuesday application deadline of 5 pm that same day. The application was reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklists and Chapter 18.78 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDOi and appears to meet the submittal requirements; therefore, the application has been deemed acceptable for initial review. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will discuss this application on two consecutive Wednesdays, October 18 and 25, 2006, at 10 am. The Design Review Board (DRB) will have this project on its consent agenda for October 25, 2006 at 5:30 pm. Staff recommends that you attend the two DRC meetings and the DRB meeting to answer any questions that may arise. "These meetings are held in the second floor Conference Room at the Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, Bozeman, Montana. We have yet to determine whether the applications and required submittal materials contain the detailed supporting information that is adequate to allow for the review process to continue beyond the DRC. You will be notified regarding the adequacy of the application on or before October 25, 2006. Once the application is deemed adequate, it will be forwarded to the City Commission with a Staff Report for the final hearing and decision. Please feel free to contact me at 582-2260 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, �usan Kozub <\� Associate Planner CC: Paul & Melissa Cronin, PO Box 160556, Big Sky NIT 59716 Ross McMilin, 3950 Dry Creek Road, Belgrade ALIT 59714 C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc, 1091 Stoneridge Drive,Bozeman MT 59718 planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation . housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination DEVEL(&NT REVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREME*ND FEES Application Type: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O G Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB Checklists Required: ❑ Wetland Review Checklist ❑ Subdivision Pre-application Checklist ❑ Reuse, Change in Use/Further Development ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist ❑ COA Checklist 1 ❑ Subdivision Final Plot Checklist ❑ COA Checklist 2 ❑ Subdivision Exemption Checklist Site Plan Checklist ❑ Annexation Checklist ❑ Special Temporary Use Permit Checklist ❑ Text/Map Amendment Checklist ❑ Zoning Variance/Appeal Checklist ❑ Growth Policy Amendment Checklist PUD Checklist ❑ Te rfim s Adjoiners Certificate Required? ] Yes ❑ No D V� Number of Sets of Plans Required: Se�S `J `Yid .$ SEP 2 �'2 4 EPARTMENT OF Adjoiners Materials Required: X �r 11 Y 11 I MUNITY-DP^ ❑ None Standard - List of names and addresses for property owners within 200 feet of the site. Stomped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes addressed with the names and addresses of property owners. ❑ Subdivision Preliminary Plat Only - List; two sets of mailing labels; and one set of stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes containing the names and addresses of property owners of physically contiguous property and all recorded purchasers under contract for deed. Plus, a list and one set of stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #1q envelopes contai ing the names an addresses of all other property owners within 200 feet of the site. ��Required Fee. Ni l J{ IV I CERTIFICATE OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, die attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners within 200 feet of the propertl located at old W . Lr,- `" I� 4vbzl �ti V/V`fi is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate fist may delay review of the project. V w. Signa u:e (Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List—Prepared 11/20/03) 1 CITY OF BOZEMAN REPRINT * CUSTOMER RECEIPT ** Oper: PROFCASH Type: EP Drawer: 1 Date: 9/29/06 01 Receipt no: 44?79 DescripPtion Ouaritity Amount ZD DPCD: PUD-PRELIMINARY LEGENDS STUDIO INC 1.00 E1825.00�l Tender detail � CK CHECK 2142 $182500 Total tendered $1825:00 Total payment $1825.00 I t Trans date: 9/26/06 Time: 13:20:59 THANK YOU! 0 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Buildi IE C IE H VV IE one 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 230 " .... Bozzeman1Montana 59771-123 SEP 2 6 2006 I nwww.bozemon.net DEPARTMENT OF PLANN NG DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLL6MIb. NITYDEVELOPMENT 7 1.Name of Project/Development: Modification to P.U.D. for lots 11 & 12 of Block 5 in the Walton Homestead P.U.D. 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Paul A.&Melissa Cronin Ross McMilin J Mailing Address: P.O. Box 160556,Big Sky,MT 59716 3950 Dry Creek Road,Belgrade,MT 59714 Phone: 995-4136 406-624-0151 3.Applicant Information: �2 Name: gQ,V1� ^, ,p E-mail Address: Mailing Address: �D O Q Q)\Q U v v 14�4 o v)Q Phone: "l 6 b FAX: r2 6 - J 7 a 4. Representative Information: Name: C&H Engineering and Surveying,Inc. E-mail Address: info@chengineers.com Mailing Address: 1091 Stoneridge Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 FAX: 587-9768 5. Legal Description: Lots 11 & 12,Block 5,Walton Homestead P.U.D. Phase II 6. Street Address: 710 Matheson Way w 7. Project Description: Relocate common boundary line between the two lots. 8.Zoning Designation(s): R-3 9. Current Land Use(s): Residential Urban 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Residential Pagel Appropriate Review Fee Submitted (� w � • ff11. Gross Area: Acres: 0.2366 Square Feet. 10,306 12.Net Area: Acres: 0.2366 Square Feet: 10,306 l_---- _- — ----------.......... - 13. Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a LJ No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ En--ryway Corridor 14. Will this application require a deviation(s)? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development-Coucept Plan❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands Q P.Planned Unit Development-Preliminary Plan MOO-G. ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development-Final Plan ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development-Master Plan ❑ D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑ F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑Y.Zoning 1Nlap Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance'Pest Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z.Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Perrnit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendrnen: ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑ N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8'/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s) (if different) before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman INfunicipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: �- �� '-' Date: - �9 Applicant's Signature: , Date: I , Property Owner's Signature: �\� l Date: Property Owner's Signature: ( iVL G ti 1 Date: �( [.9 Property Owner's Signature: i Date: 9 �2`j/0 Page 2 .(Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03) PONED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECIS The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will'be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ Planned Unit Development- Concept Plan. The following informatio Xand data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information abo i adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject arcel of land 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing sho g the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and other signifi t features on the site and within one-half mile of the site 3. A computation tableeKowing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area B. Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: M� C PUD Preliminary Plan Information No N/A Yes 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'h- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and ❑ ❑ directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial ❑ ❑ uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made b-, the / ❑ Elapplicant h. Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria),BMC.The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require,or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated j. Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) Page 3 (PUD Checklist-Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04) PUD Preliminary PI nformation,continued Yes No I .N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'h- by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: k. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and �/ ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 8'/z- by 11-inches or 11- by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls and other landscaping C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or imFaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent ❑ ❑ off-site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: a. The proposed width ❑ ❑ b. Treatment of curbs and gutters, or other storm water control system if other ❑ ❑ 0 than curb and gutter is proposed C. Sidewalk systems ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the ❑ ❑ City are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following: a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 ❑ ❑ feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to ❑ ❑ the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the ❑ ❑ discretion of the City Engineer,a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses. The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 18.78.0501, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ under question,the Cry Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan apphcztion Page 4 C ❑ Planned Unit Develotant-Final Plan. The following infornmatio*data shall be submitted: PUD Final Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ❑ ' ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development �f 2. A final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the sam scale as the approved preliminary plan.If a different scale is requested or required, a copy of the approved preliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan/However, only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be permitted for final plans. The final j/lan site plan shall show the following information: a. Land use data(same information as required on the preliminary site plan) ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Attorneys or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ d. Planning Director certification of approval of the s'te plan and its ❑ ❑ El conformance with the preliminary plan e. Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions an restrictions as set forth ❑ ❑ ❑ on the site plan 3. A final landscape plan consistent with the conditions and restrictions of the ❑ El El approved preliminary plan shall be submitted. It shall also be consistent with the Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except at any stated conditions and restrictions of the preliminary plan approv shall supersede the provisions of Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping),BMC 4. An official final subdivision plat of the ice must accompany the final planned unit El ❑ El development plan when applicable.�ty approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of build'•g permits 5. Prior to submission of the final,�tan to the DRC and ADR staff, engineering Mans ❑ ❑ ❑ and specifications for sew E water, street improvements and other public improvements, and an exe ted improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation of suc• improvements,must be submitted to and approved.by the City 6. A plan for the m tenance of open space, meeting the requirements of Se:tion El El ❑ 18.72.040 (Co on Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee),BMC,shall be submitted with an application for final plan approval. Open space shown on the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of any structures not shown on the final plan Page 5 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No"or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board (DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following: Design Review Board(DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1. 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 2. 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial soace or ❑ industrial space 3• More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses, ❑ permitted service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 4• 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ 5. Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1• Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ 2. List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC (Noticing) ❑ ❑ 3• A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment uiE ❑ ❑ travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4• Boundary line of property with dimensions 0 ❑ ❑ 5. Date of plan preparation and changes ❑ ❑ 6. North point indicator ❑ ❑ 7• Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑ ❑ ❑ 8• Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ 9• Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size(floor area ratio,FAR), ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ C. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ /❑r 11. Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units,and total net and gross residentia_ ❑ ❑ density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed,and total square footage of each Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03;revised 9/22/04) General Information,continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.060.L, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless ❑ ❑ P such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the ❑ I ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑ ❑ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review,a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data,onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to ❑ ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points IT ❑ 10 5. Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site ❑ ❑ 10 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: i • a. Electric ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas ❑ ❑ i C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑ ❑ d. Water ❑ ❑ e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: a. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman ❑ ❑ Floodplain Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Page 4 Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) . ❑ ❑ b. The downstream conditions(developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑ ❑ topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details ❑ ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, ❑ ❑ parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ 15. Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 18.52, BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from t1e Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas(both ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.060R,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previously provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ 19. Landscaping-detailed plan showing plantings,equipment,and other appropriate information ❑ ❑ as required in Section 18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required,complete section C below 20. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees ❑ ❑ and shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑ ❑ ,� structures or districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telepho a numbers of both the El El property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot/ ❑ ❑ ❑ P ge 5 Landscape Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and-rtae ❑ ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain; the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys,utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with be ms to be delineated ❑ ❑ ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, J cluding watercourse buffer El ❑ El strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plat materials shown on the plan, ❑ ❑ D .including typical symbols, names (common and bota4ical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights, spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must/be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to,be provided in or near off-street parki:-ig ❑ ❑ ❑ and loading areas,including information as to the amount(in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the qumber and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ El damage during construction 10. Size,height,location and material ofp oposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water ❑ ❑ ❑ features 11. A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan — see Section 18.48.060, BMC (Landscape ❑ ❑ ❑ Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for ❑ ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ ❑ 19. Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 18.42.100,BMC (Watercourse Setbacks),if ❑ ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not ❑ ❑ ❑ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 Narrative to accompany P.U.D. Modification Checklist for all items marked No or N/A P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Information Checklist Section 1 b-f This information is not changing and shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. i-k This information is not changing and shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. Sections 2-9 all Ownership of lots is not changing due to the relocation of the lot boundary and the initial plan for the P.U.D. is not being modified. Site Plan Checklist Section A 1-5 We are not asking to change any of this information; it shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. Section B 3 This application is not relevant to the building of a structure. 9 This application is not relevant to the building of a structure. 10-18 We are not asking to change any of this information; it shall remain the same as the original P.U.D. application submittal. Section C 1 The lots in question are existing city lots. 4 - 6 The lots in question are existing city lots. 7c No house exists on lot 11. 8-25 Lots 11 & 12 are existing single-family city lots in an existing P.U.D. L. Dale Swanson&Shayla Swanson Allison Brooke Webb 731 N. 15th Aveurt A. &Melinda Winegardner 1104 70 Avenue SW . ve. 342 Gallatin Peak Dr. Calgary AB T2V OP6 Canada Bozeman, MT 59715-3237 Bozeman, MT 59715-7909 Brian &Julie Gladden Kenneth C. Webster Cory&Gretchen Higgins 1136 Camino Vallecito 3833 Happy Valley Rd. 3838 Happy Valley Rd. Lafayette, CA 94549-2813 Lafayette, CA 94549-2425 Lafayette, CA 94549-2425 Jane Crites &Michael F. Wilson Mark Tippett, Steve Hangartner& Callie M. Glanzer 786 N. 15`h Ave. Luis Perez 1627 W. Main St. PMB 263 768 N. .l5`''Ave. j Bozeman, MT 59715-3235 Bozeman, MT 59715-4011 Bozeman, MT 59715-3235 Saam-Real Estate Marvin D. Mortenstein 7177 jade Hill Ln. Ann`Van Baleno. " Bozeman, MT 59715-8398 77 Northview Ridge Ln. Bozeman, MT 59715-7805 r • � D li 11 SEP 6 2006 DEFARTPAE\1T OF pl.ANI`ING September 25, 2006 AND CGiv�lflu 11 UEVELpMENT Narrative to accompany application for P.U.D. modification for Lots 11 and 12 in Block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. The house at 710 North 15`h Street was initially owned and built by Structura, LLC. and then sold to Packy and Melissa Cronin. This application for P.U.D. modification is made by Becki D. Miller and Kira E. Cey of Structura, LLC. upon the discovery that the house at 712 North 15`h Street is located 2'-6" into the North side setback. The discovery of the house's current location was made when the adjacent property owner, Ross McMilin,was locating a proposed house to be built on his lot 11, block 5. Upon locating his proposed house, he observed that the property pin for his Southeast corner and lot 12's northeast corner was missing. This may have been the reason for the house on lot 12, being located where it is currently. Upon his observation, Rocky Mountain Engineers was hired to locate the missing pin and verify the correct location of the property pins for lots 10, 11, and 12 on block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. After locating all of the property pins, it was discovered that the house on lot 12 was in fact 2'-6" into the north side setback at the northeast corner of the house. However, no other setbacks on this lot were affected by the incorrect location of the house. The house,-is still fully on its lot. It is our best estimate that this error was made at the time of siting, excavation or pouring foundation, due to the missing northeast property pin. It is our assumption that the location of this property corner, in the absence of the pin, was measured incorrectly thus, the placement of the house does not correlate with what was originally drawn on the site plan. There is no reason that the house would need to project into the setbacks as it would have fit well within the setbacks and is frankly a mistake in siting and locating the house. Once this discovery was made a meeting occurred to discuss how the owner of lot 11(Ross McMilin) and Susan Kozub of the City of Bozeman Planning Department,would like to proceed. At this meeting, it was decide that an application for P.U.D. modification would be made to adjust the current common'property line between lots 11 & 12. This application requests that the common property line be shifted 2'-6" to the north to maintain a perpendicular property line with a 5' side setback from the house on lot 12. This will decrease the size of lot 11 from 3800 s.f. which is the minimum size allowed by the Walton Homestead P.U.D., to 3,555 s.f. The width of the lot would also be decreased to 37'-6" as apposed to 40'-0" that is the minimum width allowed in this P.U.D. � - I� VuC� "� �s �' ��„ , �" �� - ld�2�� 1 li. pIEC OW 100 September 25, 2006 FSEP 2 6 6 AN DEPAENT OF PLANNING AND COMM NITY DEVELOPMENT Narrative to accompany application for P.U.D. modification or ots and 12 in Block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. The house at 710 North 15`h Street was initially owned and built by Structura, LLC. and then sold to Packy and Melissa Cronin. This application for P.U.D. modification is made by Becki D. Miller and Kira E. Cey of Structura, LLC. upon the discovery that the house at 712 North 15`f'Street is located 2'-6" into the North side setback. The discovery of the house's current location was made when the adjacent property owner, Ross McMilin, was locating a proposed house to be built on his lot 11, block.5. Upon locating his proposed house, he observed that the property pin for his Southeast corner and lot 12's northeast corner was missing. This may have been the reason for the house on lot 12, being located where it is currently. 11 Upon his observation, Rocky Mountain Engineers was hired to locate the missing pin and verify the correct location of the property pins for lots 10, 11, and 12 on block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. After locating all of the property pins, it was discovered that the house on lot 12 was in fact 2'-6" into the north side setback at the northeast corner of the house. However, no other setbacks on this lot were affected by the incorrect location of the house. The house,-is still fully on its lot. It is our best estimate that this error was made at the time of siting, excavation or pouring foundation, due to the missing northeast property pin. It is our assumption that the location of this property corner, in the absence of the pin, was measured incorrectly thus, the placement of the house does not correlate with what was originally drawn on the site plan. There is no reason that the house would need to project into the setbacks as it would have fit well within the setbacks and is frankly a mistake in siting and locating the house. Once this discovery was made a meeting occurred to discuss how the owner of lot 1 l(Ross McMilin) and Susan Kozub of the City of Bozeman Planning Department, would like to proceed. At this meeting, it was decide that an application for P.U.D. modification would be made to adjust the current common property line between lots 11 & 12. This application requests that the common property line be shifted 2'-6" to the north to maintain a perpendicular property line with a 5' side setback from the house on lot 12. This will decrease the size of lot 11 from 3800 s.f. which is the minimum size allowed by the Walton Homestead P.U.D., to 3,555 s.f. The width of the lot would also be d-2creased to 37'-6" as apposed to 40'-0" that is the minimum width allowed in this P.U.D. AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 BL OCK 5 WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIV!SION P.U.D. PHASE 1 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERS TO RELOCATE THE COMMON LOCH TED IN THE SW 114 OF SEC. 1, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. BOUNDARY BETWEEN 2 EXISTING LOTS WITHIN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION, AND EXEMPT FROM REVIEW AS A SUBDIVISION OF P.M. M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA PURSUANT TO 76-3-207(1)(d) M.C.A. OWNER LOT 12: PAUL A. CRONIN AND MELISSA CR ONIN CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT and CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DEED REF: DOC NO. 2203420 1 VICINITY MAP We, the undersigned property owners, do hereby certify that we have caused to be surveyed, subdivided and platted into lots, as shown by this plat hereunto included, the following described tract of land, to wit: OWNER LOT 11: ROSS McMILIN DEED REF: DOC NO. 2212554 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �rB,rt Rd. Lot 11 and Lot 12, Block 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P_U.D., PHASE 1, according to the plat thereof, on file o,r L_ 5,, and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, located in the Southwest Quarter of •-^°°$1 Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. LEG E N S _ 8 5 `� Area = 10,306 square feet, 0.2366 acre or 957.5 square meters. Subject to existing easements. m ;� (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH ) 5� "°°` 1J� Tamarack St ,,..s the above described tract of land is to be known and designated as AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 5, �L®E WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.U.O., PHASE 1, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH "°" _ a 0 t D0� s - • FOUND 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH � L � D©❑ ] ®�❑ CERTIFICATE oF EXEMPTION L L 0�0 iO �C =E�❑ v„ rn M 5 (BOUNDARY RELOCATION) PLASTIC CAP (R.H. CENTER #5653ES), OR AS NOTED o =z = z -1 0❑❑❑E31:J0 ®� We certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate the common boundaries between 2 existing lots within a platted W.Beal, 00=1 �� subdivision and that this exemption complies with all conditions imposed on its use. Therefore this survey is exempt from O SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH ends^m ��©'Men enh ii i]t�d review as a subdivision pursuant to Section 76-3-207 (1)(d), M.C.A., and the Bozeman Municipal Code. _ W. M in St. -0 HDM=F n❑❑❑❑ PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518ES) This survey is exempt from review by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to A_R.M. 17.36.605(2)(b). BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: THE SOUTI� LINE OF LOT 12, - _ _ ° 0❑00(]�,a, RE1110 �1 BLOCK 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.�1.D., PHASE 1, = `❑❑❑❑❑i��©Q0 F - ll r --� - Dated this day of 2006. 00 o BEING 270'00'00 NOT TO SCALE Paul A. Cronin Melissa Cronin E;� N I c STATE OF MONTANA o,Hz;z n [N4500 00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZgMUTH SHOWN % COUNTY of GALLATIN On this _— day of _ in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for ' the State of Montana, personally appeared Paul A. Cronin and Melissa Cronin, known to me to be the f persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed BL.%.Jctx 5the same. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year !LOT 10 Fn---T'-W.C., er• CSC in this certificate first above written. GARY A. TURNER Fnd 1' W_C� residing at LOT 17 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA � 2214457 � [EAST] Printed Name: (R&M)090'00'00" Set 1.5" Alum. ' my commission expires 95.04 Cap 1' W.C. 11 Fnd rebGr bent i _ Dated this day of 2006. .� ;r, LOT 11 o Ross McMilin s in N 3,555 Sq Ft ,t o H 0 OPEN SPACE -7 STATE OF MONTANA ,n 0.0816 Acre r` C o ) � � V) O UI COUNTY OF GALLATIN O o M [EAST] " --� On this day of in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for Z 000'00 00 Set 1.5" Ilum the State of Montana, personally appeared Ross McMilin, known to me to be the person whose name is New Boundary Line 94.98 Cap 1' W. subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate Fnd YPC Previous Boundary Line Fnd 1' W.C. first above written. 10' U ility Easement LOT 13 residing at ^� LOT 12 0 r-, SNOW RIDGE PROPERTIES, L.L.C. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA 00 0 2184791 N ONO 6,751 Sq Ft O Printed Name: my commission expires o ;n 0.1550 Acre 00 n OF ONj CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR zM 10' Utility Easement ��, qN,9� ,_, I, Mark A• Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby certify that between Pu6�cless 20 �a MARK A. o Aug_ 16 and Sept. , 2006, this survey was made under my direct supervision, and I have platted . i o the same as shown on the accompanying plat, and as described, in accordance with the provisions of m CHANDLER > the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Sections 76-3-101 through through 76-3-625, M.C.A_, and 10' Utility Easement I I h5� N No. 9518ES the Bozeman Municipal Code. tK 'Co o =14.50 77.40 R�IN�,`L�p�" �9l �FGI STERN` �Q�V L=3.00 270'00'00' (R&M) �-�O F /N PN� Dated this day of 2006. 0=11*51'15" [WEST] Mark A. Chandler M Mae Street Montana Registration No. 9518ES CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR Scale In Feet I. Planning Director for the City of Bozeman, do hereby certify that the use of the exemption claimed 30 0 30 71 -F T on the accompanying Amended Plat has been duly reviewed and has been found to conform to the requirements of the Subdivision and Platting Act, Section 76-3-101 et_ seq., M.C.A., and the Bozeman Municipal Code. LOT T 4 Dated this _ day of 2006. Scale In Meters LOT 1 Planning Director, City of Bozeman, Montana I N L l CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER 0 C, I, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat _I has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided have been paid. 10 Dated this day of _ 2006. By: Oeputy Treasurer of Gallatin County CLERK AND RECORDER I, Shelley Vance, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was filed in my office at __ o'clock __.M. this �N day of , A.D., 2006, and recorded in Book ___ of Plats, on Page , records of the Clerk and � � I Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. '1091 Stanendge Orive'o Bazerimari, tVli 597'ii j4tl>ti '6£ 1 B Document Number By: ehri~e,atamfa. eiit e Deputy Clerk and Recorder #Q 6 cJ S 7(A P) --L— — — — N --N-- — _ PROPOSED SME SETBACK N N N = 5 — N LOT 11, N GAS s� zQa II BLOCK 5 cooFROWSEIBACIC II ~ + EwsTB+o AREA.3,eoo S.F. 2� NEW AREA•3.555 S.F. BFAR SHIHA« SEMUX _— N w 600 north wallaoe avenue III— O loft one hoaaman,rat 59715 H phone 406.556.6676 4 II PROPO6ED PROPS LINE l fox 406.556.5782 EXISTING PR.OPER7Y LINE— j — — �qWq r N �••+ Repdadoo.fthnd— r^Ei Y i and/or muse of this design 20-M —— —————— wid—the capes ariaev FRONT SETBACK —ne of legends Studio,Inc. HOUSE AS N violates ehe copyright l of de NLOWED Uoi ed Sneer and wM be ONSM N b)ea.leg1 ptrecueioa cownwht Legendsgym. �— I r• STRUCTURA, BLOOCK I I. N II ►—� LLC W I EXISTING AREA-6,505 S.P. I! N PARADE HOME NEW AREA.6,751 SF. � I II � II 1 BLOCK 5 LOT 12 7 110 N.15TH AVE /`-i II — ■ II WALTON HOMESTEAD 1�Li i I N II BOZEMAN,MT 59715 WA7IIt I� IREAR lva G — u'1 _ ED 9 � Pws!>rlo z I w e3 7RATISFDR6fER' e� — � b of ►v�l'`JI I�toPFnn tn+E $ cnY EWAu! 9aa ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION MAE STREET SITE PLAN SITE PLAN scA L 1/l6•-la �� 5003 717.05 A1 . 1 x '4 D EC �a��: SEP 2 6 1006 DEPARTMENT Of PLANNING September 25, 2006 AND GOMMUNITY DMIDPMENT Narrative to accompany application for P.U.D. modification for Lots 11 and 12 in Block 5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. The house at 710 North 15`h Street was initially owned and built by Structure, LLC. and then sold to Packy and Melissa Cronin. This application for P.U.D. modification is made by Becki D. Miller and Kira E. Cey of Structura, LLC. upon the discovery that the house at 712 North 15`h Street is located 2'-6" into the North side setback. The discovery of the house's current location was made when the adjacent property owner, Ross McMilin, was locating a proposed house to be built on his lot 11, block 5. Upon locating his proposed house, he observed that the property pin for his Southeast corner and lot 12's northeast corner was missing. This may have been the reason for the house on lot 12, being located where it is currently. Upon his observation, Rocky Mountain Engineers was hired to locate the missing pin and verify the correct location of the property pins for lots 10, 11, and 12 on bloc{5 of the Walton Homestead P.U.D. After locating all of the property pins, it was discovered that the house on lot 12 was in fact 2'-6" into the north side setback at the northeast corner of the house. However, no other setbacks on this lot were affected by the incorrect location of the house. The house,-is still fully on its lot. It is our best estimate that this error was made at the time of siting, excavation or pouring foundation, due to the missing northeast property pin. It is our assumption that the location of this property corner, in the absence of the pin, was measured incorrectly thus, the placement of the house does not correlate with what was originally drawn on the site plan. There is no reason that the house would need to project into the setbacks as it would have fit well within the setbacks and is frankly a mistake in siting and locating the house. Once this discovery was made a meeting occurred to discuss how the owner of lot I I(Ross McMilin) and Susan Kozub of the City of Bozeman Planning Department, would like to proceed. At this meeting, it was decide that an application for P.U.D. modification would be made to adjust the current common property line between lots 11 & 12. This application requests that the common property line be shifted 2'-6" to the north to maintain a perpendicular property line with a 5' side setback from the house on lot 12. This will decrease the size of lot 11 from 3800 s.f. which is the minimum size allowed by the Walton Homestead P.U.D., to 3,555 s.f. The width of the lot would also be decreased to 37'-6" as apposed to 40'-0" that is the minimum width allowed in this P.U.D. AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 BL OCK5, WAL TON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.U.D. PHASE y SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERS TO RELOCATE THE COMMON LOCA TED IN THE SW 114 OF SEC. 1, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. BOUNDARY BETWEEN 2 EXISTING LOTS WITHIN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION, AND EXEMPT FROM REVIEW AS A SUBDIVISION PURSUANT TO 76-3-207(1)(d) M.C.A. OF P. M. M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA OWNER LOT 12: PAUL A. CRONIN AND MELISSA CRONIN CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT and CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DEED REF: DOC NO. 2203420 VICINITY MAP We, the undersigned propert owners, do hereby certify that we have caused to be surveyed, subdivided and platted into lots, as shown by this plat hereunto included, the following described tract of land, to wit: OWNER LOT 11: ROSS McMILIN DEED REF: DOC N0. 2212554 `° a, LEGAL DESCRIPTION B.—a°. Lot 11 and Lot 12, Block 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P_U.D_, PHASE 1. according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, located in the Southwest Quarter of evooO51 Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P_M.M. L_EG EN D Area = 10,306 square feet, 0.2366 acre or 957.5 square meters. Subject to existing easements. m�> -W«$1 5,. (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH I i Tamarack St L ❑❑ the above described tract of land is to be known and designated as AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 5, S< : �� DL®❑ WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.U.D., PHASE 1, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH "'°" DoPe c • FOUND 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH � n 08❑ � 0® ❑ CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION L.J (BOUNDARY RELOCATION) , OR AS NOTED PLASTIC CAP R.H. CENTER 5653ES _ u5noo❑ -" 5,❑ ( # ) a =z = z ,� ❑❑❑0=1❑ .®,0 We certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate the common boundaries between 2 existing lots within a platted ❑E:)=G®F----�0 Q subdivision and that this exemption complies with all conditions imposed on its use. Therefore this survey is exempt from 0 SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH ��®II--Men enn ii ]t 0H review as a subdivision pursuant to Section 76-3-207 (1)(d), M.C.A., and the Bozeman Municipal Code. PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518ES) a 0®00k St.[' ]©❑❑❑ This survey is exempt from review by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to A_R.M. 17.36.605(2)(b). BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: THE SO T LINE OF LOT 12, _° ° `❑❑❑❑❑�„, 5,®❑❑❑ BLOCK 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION .D., PHASE 1, ❑IKoch g 0 `❑❑❑❑❑❑��0� C� Doted this day of 2006. BEING 27900'00" °NOT TO SCALE Paul A. Cronin Melissa Cronin � [N4900'00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM A 1IMUTH SHOWN STATE OF MONTANA COUNTY OF GALLATIN On this _— day of ____ in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Paul A. Cronin and Melissa Cronin, known to me to be the BLOK 5C Z persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same_ In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year Fnd V W.C., en in this certificate first above written. LOT 10 GARY A. TURNER Fnd 1 W.0 O residing at 2214457 LOT 17 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA CV � EAST '� � [ � T ] " ` Printed Name: my commission expires (R&M)090 00 00 Set 1.5 Alum. 95.04 Cap 1' W.C. Fnd rebar bent LOT 11ko - Dated this day of 2006. O �� Ross McMilin -� Nit 3,555 Sq Ft I dN p OPEN SPACE STATE OF MONTANA 4Y in ,n 0.0816 Acre o p � ' [EAST] M a00 L� COUNTY OF GALLATIN O M On this day of in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for Z 000*00 00 Set 1.5" Lum the State of Montana, personally appeared Ross McMilin, known to me to be the person whose name is '--' New Boundary Line 94•98 Cap 1' W. subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the some. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate Fnd YPC Previous Boundary Line Fnd V W.C. first above written. 10' U ility Easement LOT 1 J� residing at LOT 12 00 0 � SNOW RIDGE PROPERTIES, L.L.C. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA o s 2184791 O O F— N :q c0 6,751 Sq Ft n O ,O Printed Name: my commission expires 0 En o 0.1550 Acre 000 O rn - OF MONTH C E RTI FI CATE O F S U RVEYO R Z M — 10' Utility Easement �,P q q 1, Mark A. Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby certify that between r Publicness 20 �a MARK A. CC(- Aug_ 16 and Sept. , 2006, this survey was made under my direct supervision, and I have platted i o r the same as shown on the accompanying.plot, and as described, in accordance with the provisions of .\ t rmn CHANDLER > the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Sections 76-3-101 through through 76-3-625, M.C.A_, and f 10' Utility Easement I } I ^cb NN'o No. 9518ES the Bozeman Municipal Code. =14.50 77.40FCI STER�`��Q�� L=3.00 270'00'00' (R&M) ��O /NEER PN� Dated this day of ___ 2006. 6---11*51'15" [WEST] Mark A. Chandler M Mae Street Montana Registration No. 9518ES CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR Scale In Feet T— T 1, Planning Director for the City of Bozeman, do hereby certify that the use of the exemption claimed 30 0 30 71 on the accompanying Amended Plat has been duly reviewed and has been found to conform to the I I Trequirements of the Subdivision and Platting Act, Section 76-3-101 et_ seq_, M.C.A., and the Bozeman 9 0 9 Municipal Code. Dated this _-- day of 2006. Meters T L O T 4 �J L 0 I 1 Planning Director, City of Bozeman, Montana ' CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER •�6 2006 F— I— L `` I, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat r. �,1ENT OF PLANNING I _I —J has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on Hvi)C MiJiUNI Y1) LOPMEPfi' P the land to be subdivided have been aid. Dated this day of 2006. By. � w Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County (B OCI` �• CLERK AND RECORDER 1, Shelley Vance, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was filed in my office at —_ o'clock —.M. this -- day of A.D., 2006, and recorded in Book of Plats, on Page _ records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gaiiatin County, Montana. 109� Stoneridge Drive Bozeman,MT 59718 94T3 ) 87 6I a771�E Document Number By: yw,tttef3grtr er titatent �k orb . Deputy Clerk and Recorder #0 6 5 5 7(A P) . ............ _ O I ' I— —— — — — — — P7tOPOS®SIDE SETBACK — — — — 1 � I I w o SEwm — I LOT 11, I I GAS E— ��" I BLO KC — POWER FRoxrsETEACK ~�c� EXISTING AREA•3,800 S.F. NEW AREA•3,555 S.F. REqR SkMCK EA l� ' I PROPOSED SIDE SETBACK I 600 north wallace avenue loft one § bozeman,rut 59715 aOaG H I phone 406.556.6676 PROPOSEDPROPEA7'Y1141E fax 406.556.5782 oasnNO PROPERTY MNE H i- — uaion of rbis sheet §W ltepmd and/or reuse of this design w¢bout be eps.esswrinen FRONT SETEACK co sseor of lzw ds Swdio,hrc HOUSEAS vlolares die mpyrigaws o t lf rbe LOCATED I United Stares and wi0 be I ON SITE I subject w legal prosecodoo. CoppVbt02W5 SEWER— I I — I I Ln—d,Swdin,1— LOT 12, I I I I w F--a STRUCTURA, I BLOCK 5 I I i I ►--� LLC EXISTINOAREA•6,505 S.F. I ❑c I 6 ' NEW AREA-6,751 S.F. I I PARADE HOME BLACK 5 TAT 12 WALTON HOMESTEAD ■ BOZEMAN,MT 59715 WATER I I �O ■ L S Wffi- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- N - - - - - - - - - � w o EXISlINO FL _ � u,3S § TRANSPORMER� o D PROPERTY I.A7E S ----- ------- cmS EWAIK 9W ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION MAE STREET .�.�. SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 4I.1 SCAfE I/16'-1'4' ^OFCT1p 5003 03.17.05 A1 . 1 AMSYDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AA D = BLOCK 5v WALTON HOiI EWEAD SII D/VISION RUM, PHASE 1 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERS TO RELOCATE THE COMMON LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF SEC. 1, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. BOUNDARY BETWEEN 2 EXISTING LOTS WITHIN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION, AND EXEMPT FROM REVIEW AS A SUBDIVISION PURSUANT TO 76-3-207(1)(d) M.C.A. OF P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMANa GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA OWNER LOT 12: PAUL A. CRONIN AND MELISSA CRONIN CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT and CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DEED REF: DOC NO. 2203420 VICINITY MAP We,the undersigned property owners, do hereby certify that we hove caused to be surveyed, subdivided and potted into lots, as shown by this pot hereunto included, the following Described tract of bed, to wit OWNER LCT 11; ROSS McMIUN >. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ILot 11 and lot 12, Book 5,WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBOMSION P,U.0., PHASE I, according to the plot thereof, on file DEED REF: DOC NO. 2212554 � and of record In the office of the Clerk and Recorder,Gonatin County, Montano, bested in the Southwest Quarter of Section 1.Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. E LGEND L Area - 10,306 square feet,0.2366 acre or 957Z square meters. Subject to existing easements. (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH 6I 3 ��1 .....��❑ ��r111`O❑ the above described tract of land Is to be known and designated as AMENDED PLAT B T OF LOTS I AND 12, BLOCK 5, ❑��❑ WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDMSION P,U,D„ PHASE 1, City of Bozeman,Gallatin County, Montano. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH f _ ❑❑❑ CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION • FOUND 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH �©� (BOUNDARY RELOCATION) PLASTIC CAP (R,H. CENTER )[5653ES), OR AS NOTED0000L-i We certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate the common boundaries between 2 existing lots within a platted ❑❑��® ��®!� subdX% and that this exemption compiles with all conditions Imposed on its use. Therefore this survey Is exempt from 0000�oo 0 SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WiTH 1 1/4 INCH �= o®®©o�o review as a anbdivislon pursuant to Section 75-3-207 (1)(d), MCA., and the Bozeman Municipal Code, W M in Sr. PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H j[9518ES) oo This survey is exempt from review by the Montano Deportment of Environmental Quality pursuant to AAM, 17,36,605(2)(b), El BEd RU U900 BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH; THE SOOT LINE OF LOT 12, s r °0-00000- ROOD BLOCK 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.�1.D., PHASE 1, DlKnch 9 L�LIIJr❑❑❑❑❑❑�'In'Ing ; Doted this day of 2006. BEING 270'00'00" NOT TO SCALE o n e sac ronin [N45'00'00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZIMUTH SHOWN STATE OF MONTANA j COUNTY OF GALLATIN 1! On this_ day of in the year 2006, before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public for BLOCK Ct the State—of Montano, personally subsc appeared Paul A, Cronin and Melissa doc Cronin, known to me to t be the persons whose names ore subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same, In wkness whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my oNlclal seal the day and year Frfd-T`1p.C., f: in this certificate first above written, LOT-1 0 ..�. _ — GARY A. TURNER W,C 2214457 (42 LOT 17 NOTARY PUBLICFOR THE STATE MONTANA residing at ? [EAST] 0)ti Printed Name: my commission expires (R&M)090'00'00" Set 1.5" Alum, � 95,04 Co 1' W.C. '�' Fnd rebar bent R Dated this day of 2006. �i LOT 11 p,� Ross McMilln *R O ale 3,555 Sq Ft a' i Io OPEN SPACE_ .0 M 0,0816 Acre I O N �—— STATE OF MONTANA COUNTY GALLATIN p [EAST] 00 On this_ day of in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for Z"1 000'00'00" Set 1.5" um the State of Montana, personally appeared Ross MCMilin, known to me to be the person whose name is New Boundary Line 94.98 Cop V W. subscribed to the wlthln Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the soma. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate Fnd YPC Previous Boundary Line Fnd 11I WC II first above written. R10' Ulmty Easement LOT 13 raskllnq at SNOW RIDGE PROPERTIES, L.L.C. TARP R THE STATE ANA LOT 12 3 N p p 2184791 N 6,751 Sq Ft I :po Printed Name: my commission expires 0.1550 Acre V— op�nOFMOy� CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR Z,y� —F— Utility Eoseme�rt i I, Mork A, Chandler, Professional Engineer and fond Surveyor No. 951@ES, do hereby certify that between rTt'Pu6lic�eas 20 � Mom( A. Aug. i5 and Sept _, 2006,this survey was made under my direct supervision, and 1 have plotted ` the some os shown on the occompon%nq plot, and as described, In accordance with the provisione of — '� CHANDLER the Montano Subdivision and Plotting AAcctt,, Sections 76-3-101 through through 76-3-625, M.C,A„ and 10' Utility Easement I ' I NO. 9518ES the Bozeman Municipal Code. =14.50 77.40 RO1�`�po L=3.00 270'00'00 (R&M) Dated thi: day of 2006. &=11'51'15" [WEST] D Mark A, Chandler Mae Street M Montana Reglstration No, 9518ES - T- T- T CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR Scale Iri Fast I, Planning Director for the City of Bozeman, do hereby certify that the use of the exemption claimed 30 0 30 71 on the accompanying Amended Plot has been duly reviewed and hot been found to conform to the EEiWT6iiiiiiiirequirements of the Subdivision and Platting Act.Section 76-3-101 st, sag„M.CA and the Bozeman 9 0 9 FMunicipal Code, Scale in mate" L 0 T 1 L O I 4 Dated this day of 2006. Planning Director, City a$ Bozeman. Montano c� ,� CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER 0 1, Kimberly Buchanan,Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montano,do hereby certify that the accompanying plot J J has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided hove been paid. ".....�+.*...,,.� _- Dated this day of . 2006, By. fr � �� Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County D ;S:E /� � 2_ T CLERK AND RECORDER Imo( Jam' Irr I, Shelley Vance,Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,Montano, do hereby certify that the foregoing Instrument woe filed in my office at_o'clock-.M. this_ day of 'A.D.. P 2 62006. and recorded In Book of Plats,on e ,records of the Clerk and 2006if�l� r"7rh c"at"1T t1?l/ ir1 ')fi"t": Recorder.Gallatin County, Montano. ()Document Number ARTMENT OFPB'„ Deputy Clerk and Recorder06557 AP ,p COMMUFJIN O LANNING EVELOPMENT .i PROPOSED SIDE SETBACK — I w SEWER - I LOT 11, I I BLOCK —�- FRONT SEMCK EXLSTING AREA,3,800 S.F. 4 NEWAREA-3^555SF. RJRg jgA I I m� ' I — —— — — — — — — PROPOSEDSMESE7BAX X I a 600 north Wallace I— loft one bozeman,mt 59 a§, ( phone 406.556.0 PROPOSEDPROPERTYLINE fax 406.556.57 EX4SIW0 PROPERTY LINE 1'^ — I — ,►J�1• Repmduction ofdus shri H8� �, � a�rmua of this deb 204 — — — — — — — v'nhout the«peswmti FRONF SETBACK <a�nt of iegnds Stndi HOUSEAS violates the mpyd law LOCATED I United Sates end wiH be I j ON SHE I subject to kgdl prosecutk I C py.igluQZppS r Legends Studio,I— SEW-- LOT 12, I I I I a STRUCTU I BLOCK 5 I I I I LLC OOSHNGAREA-6"SF. I ^= PARADE HON ' NEW AREA-6.751 S.F. I I I BI:IJC,KSIA 4 710 N.15TH A I � WALTON HOME$ ° I BOZEMAN,MT 5 WATER � I I i R>1IR Imo, 1EI m — — — —— — — — — — — — — — _ m — — — — — —— El 9 � z § 0 b� — PROPERLY LINE _ O CITY EWALK We 1 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTI( t MAE STREET t I SITE PLAN �Z SITE PLAN Ll SCALL. I/16^-ro1 5003 03.17.05 a A1 . 1 I _ 'r r Is ti — — -- II ——�IcaraAs� �— �o _ PROPOSED ME SETBACK —————Ll — li II Ill w, I II b SGWER II LOT 11, II w II BLOCK 5 II PcF zaa � � POWFx �;�. FROND SEMCK II iP70SIWGARPA-3,Boo S.F. u NEWAREA-3555S3'. RE1RIS6BACK II a4 PROPOSED SIDE SETBACK — II I 600 north Wallace avenue loft one II C bozeman,rat 59715 II phone 406.556.6676 � — — PROPOSED PROPERTY LANE — I fax 406.556.5782 EXIS WO PROPERTYIAIE— Rep.uducti of this sheet � I / and/o nnssese of thu design 20'4 " Y —————— with u the c,gxess written PRONPSEIHACK /� consntoflegends Studio lac. HOUSE AS ry violates dw copleWht lswsof the I._ LAC/17ED II Uniad Staresand wm he ON SPLE II subject to legal pros tiom Legmds ndio.In<. — LOT 12, I II w i--� STRUCTURA, I BLOCK 5 I I. II II LLC E1M-Mr,AREA•6505 SF. II II NEW AREA.6,751 SF. li PARADE HOME b I II II BLOCK 5 LOT 12 z7 I ° —t� + 710 N.15TH AVE + r II WALTON HOMESTEAD II BOZEMAN,MT 59715 WATER i II L -- . 9 oasnNo El `e� O TRANSMRMER1\vlTL►JI'— 8 PROPERTY I3NE CCIY Lt5VA1K 946' ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION i MAE STREET SITE PLAN SITE PLAN SCALE- 116'-1'4' t rmperw 5003 03.17.05 Al A D PLAT OF LOTS 11-AND 12 BLOCK S, WALTON HOMESTEAD RUM, PHASE 1 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERS TO RELOCATE THE COMMON LOCH TED IN THE SW 114 OF SEC. 1, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. BOUNDARY BETWEEN 2 EXISTING LOTS WITHIN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION TO 76-3-207(1)(d) M.C.A.AND EXEMPT FROM REVIEW AS A SUBDIVISION PURSUANT OF P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA • P OWNER LOT 12: PAUL A. CRONIN AND MELISSA CRONIN CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT and CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DEED REF: DOC N0, 2203420 VICINITY MAP We,the undersigned property ownere, do horeby oertNy that we have caused to be eurvged, subdivided and plotted Into tote, as shown by this pkrt hereunto Included, the following described tract of land, to nit: OWNER LCT 11: ROSS McMILIN DEED REF: DOC NO. 2212554 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot I and Lot 12. Black 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDMSION RUA, PHASE 1, ocoordlnq to the plat thereof, on file and of record In the office of the Clerk and Recorder,Gallatin County, Montano, located in the Southwest Ouarter of LEGEND Section 1. Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. Area - 10,306 square feet,0.2366 care or 957.5 square meters. Subject to existing easemeMe. (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH EI �t 4 . "QD❑❑ ❑O the above described treat of land Is to be known and designated as AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 5. a LJ WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBOMSION P,U,O„ PHASE 1,City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montano. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH 1 ®❑�o❑� CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION e FOUND 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH URI ® (BOUNDARY RELOCATION) PLASTIC CAP (R,H. CENTER #5653ES). OR AS NOTEDthat the purpose of this survey la to rol«ats the common twuslariea latwoon 2 ndstlnq we■ithln a pkrile4 and that this exemption complies with oil conditions Imposed on its use. Therefore this survey Is exempt from 0 SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH ®®®®u O❑❑❑❑ review as a anbdMalon pursuant to Section 76-3-207 (1)(d), M,CA, and the Bozeman Municipal Code. PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518ES) OOlT S1�000 This survey Is exempt from review by the Montana Department of Environmental Duality pursuant to A.R.M. 17.36.605(2)(b). ❑ RR®0 m ®[�R ❑❑ BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: THE SOUTf� LINE OF LOT 12, / �� ❑❑❑❑❑�®❑❑❑ BLOCK 5. WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P. .D., PHASE 1, IIIx��eccctinn��llJJ ❑ ❑❑❑00 Dotes this of 2006. BEING 270'00'00" NOT TO SCALE ° Cronin E60 Cronin [N45'00'00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM AZIMUTH SHOWN STATE OF MONTANA I I COUNTY OF GAL ATIN I On this_ dig of in the year 2006, before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Paul A. Cronin and Melisso Cronin, known to me to be the BLOCK C J persons whom names are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that executed ® the some. In witnem whereof, I have hereunto set affixed t my hand and axed my official seal the�and year LOT-1 0 Ffld"- 'Cj-: In this certificate first above written. . GAR2 A. TURNER Fnd 1 WC m .wing at AR1' r �3 L 0 T 17 N PUBLIC FOR THE ATE MONTANA [EAST] h � Printed Nome: my commWIon expires C (R&M)090'00'00" Set 1.5" Alum. i 95.04 Cap 1' W.C. 15- x Fnd reborn bent LOT 1 1 Dated this day of 2006• Rom McMllln w a v 3.555 Sq Ft I a$ C OPEN SPACE STATE of MONTANA 0,0816 Awe M 00 0 �-- COUNTY OF GAtLATIN N g NM [EAST] aD I On this_ dig of in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, o Notary Public for ?,n 000'00'00" Set 1.5" um the State of Montana, personally appeared Rom McMifin, known to me to be the person whom name Is New Boundary Line 94.98 Ca 1' 4. subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and off xed my official seal the day and year In this certificate Fnd YPC Previous Boundary Line Fnd I',WC first above written. t ` 10' ulnity Easement LOT 13 3x r SNOW RIDGE PROPERTIES, L.L.C. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATEMONTANA residing at LOT 12 I ? 2184791 N t0 6,751 Sq Ft I 9 0 Printed Nome my commission expires A xV 0.1550 Awe In 0 N P Otn Co. O CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR 0 10' Utility Easema�lt tOSv 0 I, Mork A. Chandler, Professional Engineer mid Land Surveyor No. 9518M.do hereby certify that between r I I PGRC-x7m 20 MAW A. Aug, 16 and Sept. _, 2006,this survey was made under my direct supervision, and I have plotted ` the some as shown on the eacomparuyirlg plat, cnd as described. In accordance with the provisions of �O77.40 CHANDLER the Montano Subdivision and Platting AAcctt,, flans 76-3—t01 through through 76-3-625, M.C.A„ and 10' Utnity Easement I 1 v5 j No. 9518ES the Bozeman Municipal Code, = �101116& f FCIs1EL=3,00 270'00'00 (R&M) Ii t11� Dated this dig of 2006. 6=1151'15" [WEST] Cl Mark A, Chandler 3 $� Mae Street M Montana Registration No, 9518M T T CERTIFICATE OF PL-ANNING DIRECTOR Scale I» Peet I I, Planning Director for the City of Oarsman, do hereby certify that the use of the exemption claimed 3 0 30 ( I on the oacomparylrrq Mnended Plat has been duly reviewed and has been found to conform to the 71 requirements of the SuDOlvlalan and Platting Act. Section 76-3-101 at. seq., M.CA, and the Bozeman 1 Munlelpol Code. 9 0 9 Dated this dig of 2006. Scale in etetera I I LOT 1 � I L O I 4 Planning Director.dry of Bozeman. Montana CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER V I 1, Kimberly Buchanan.Treasurer of Gallatin County. Montana. do hereby certify that the accompanying plat J J has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided have been paid. Dated this day of 2000. By c ®� � Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County B � 4 CLERK AND RECORDER p C�[ 0�E '^�ley Vanes,Cork oM Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the for ng y 2006. and recorded In Boyok office at of Plate. P.e, this_ day of 0 SEP 2 6 1�1f�l�Er"1lJtc"jhd�' k.jyj .r1} 1r1.�'is: I Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. records of the 0erk and �0OC T+ a! J L1 V.. u It 45 0 1 CF91 Stonenxlge ihwe Bazemen�A4Y 9'971t3 bq ppf " A4Tg fgx[4(�@�t> 975(3�: Document Number r vioh��&1eaRa oo rla k s. Deputy Clerk and Recorder 06557 AP ^U COMITM NN'IT`�OF PLANNING �LOPMENT i N. 15TH AVENUE -j cm Mopm7yum 8 I ssa I T (A I ' �tN 4 0 II l b I I I I r II I ,. � • I SME 7d i ua�rencx COANEMSIDES 4 34' tPASEMENI! I I I I� II i SFO L 1 1 Q Q I I I PE mTY• PRO"AW MIE ALLEY ssa . ALLEYWAY ew �w Om i N � ° �00 o ao LEGEND S _ ? x o r ° " z �� p � a�d STUDIO , INC . m P, tiaN a C � �� ( D Engineering and Surveying Inc. SEP 0 7 2006 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman,NrT 59718 ENT OF PLANNING Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(408)587-9768 DEPA LAITY DEVELOPMENT www.chengineers.com•info®chengineere.com pND COMM DATE: September 7, 2006 TO: City of Bozeman Planning ATTN: Susan Kozub P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 FROM: Mark A. Chandler,P.E., P.L.S. RE: Amended Plat, Walton Homestead PUD (06557) QTY. DESCRIPTION 1 Copy of proposed plat on 11 x 17 PURPOSE: As You Requested For Design Revisions For Your Information/Records For Your Signature/return For Your Approval ✓ Other: (See Remarks) U.S. Mail Federal Express ✓ Hand Delivered For Pick Up REMARKS: Susan, Could you look at this plat and let me know if you see anything that would need to be added or revised? We would like your input prior to making the final mylars. Thanks. Mark i Copies to: BILLINGS: ITT S9:L ```� �`°�.•fi�°` ' "d CITY OF BOZEMAN �ANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT yJ% 20 EAST OLIVE STREET s P.O. BOX 1230 BOZEMAN, MT 59771 � 6C 9 �c� sGl v�,dr �`Cra%r� sccrbu.sch v�, w � gozewt.aw, r OCT 2 7 2006 \ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1�IB-z imo►iW-:, „life 1,,,11,'1,1„1„I,,,I1,1,J►,11,,,,11,1,i,d,lli `� �� i • : �; �. �, T 1 r �--� -� ,, -.� � .�.. * % /i Y / � AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 BLOCK A WALTON HOMESTEAD SURD/V/S/TON RUM, PHASE 1 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNERS TO RELOCATE THE COMMON LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF SEC. 1, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. BOUNDARY BETWEEN 2 EXISTING LOTS WITHIN A PLATTED SUBDIVISION, AND EXEMPT FROM REVIEW AS A SUBDIVISION PURSUANT TO 76-3-207(1)(d) M.C.A. OF P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA OWNER LOT 12: PAUL A. CRONIN AND MELISSA CRONIN CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT and CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DEED REF: DOC N0. 2203420 �/I C I N ITY MAP We, the undersigned property owners, do hereby certify that we have caused to be surveyed, subdivided and platted into lots, as shown by this plot hereunto included, the following described tract of land, to wit: OWNER LOT 11: ROSS McMILIN DEED REF: DOC N0. 2212554 F LEGAL DESCRIPTION I Lot 11 and Lot 12, Block 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.U.D., PHASE 1, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, located in the Southwest Quarter of ®�I Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M. LEGEND J Area = 10.306 square feet, 0.2366 acre or 957.5 square meters. Subject to existing easements. ' i 6I i ®❑I❑ ❑� the above described tract of land is to be known and designated as AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 5, (R) RECORD DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH MF ....`®ay.. Imo, 0 WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P.U.D., PHASE 1• Gallatin County, Montana. (M) MEASURED DISTANCE OR AZIMUTH ��Ll^J❑❑❑ ® CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION • FOUND 5 8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1 4 INCH E (BOUNDARY RELOCATION)PLASTIC AP (R.H. CENTER #5653ES) 1�(}—® We certify that the purpose of this survey is to relocate the common boundaries between 2 existing lots within a platted 0000®�r. .Asubdivision and that this exemption complies with all conditions imposed on its use. Therefore this survey is exempt from O SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 1 1/4 INCH ®®®®Men 12I 7 review as a subdivision pursuant to Section 76-3-207 (1)(d), M.C , and the Bozman Municipal Code. dh PLASTIC CAP MARKED (C&H #9518ES) ®®�® ❑1 This survey is exempt from review by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality pursuant to A.R.M. 17.36.605(2)(b). 11 [3511 Dlltcsti�kJ��D OCE]" DE] BASIS FOR AZIMUTHS FROM NORTH: THE SOUT LINE OF LOT 12, � ❑❑❑❑❑�❑❑� BLOCK 5, WALTON HOMESTEAD SUBDIVISION P. .D., PHASE 1, ❑❑❑❑❑❑®0D Doted this day of 2006. BEING 270'00'00" f NOT TO SCALE Paul A. Cronin Melissa Cronin [N45'00'00"E] BEARING COMPUTED FROM A7JIMUTH SHOWN I / STATE OF MONTANA I ' COUNTY OF GALLATIN On this day of _ _ in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Paul A Cronin and Melissa Cronin, known to me to be the BLOCK persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the some. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year Fnd I' W.C.,Jen in this certificate first above written. LOT 10 GARY A. TURNER Fnd 1' o O1 residing at 2214457 N NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA LOT 17 [EAST] r7"� Printed Name: my commission expires (R&M)090'00'00" Set 1.5" Alum. 95.04 Cap 1' W.C. Fnd rebar bent Dated this day of 2006. w 3 LOT 11 `00= Ross McMilin a a 3,555 Sq Ft I v o D OPEN SPACE STATE OF MONTANA 10 0.0816 Acre In o O � O P r- M O N COUNTY OF GALLATIN & 00 Nr7 [EAST] a0,__, On this day of in the year 2006, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for 0 Z 000'00'00" Set 1.5" lum the State of Montana• personally appeared Ross McMilin, known to me to be the person whose name is LNewBoundary Line 94.98 Cap 1' W. subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the some. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate Fnd YPC- rev Bou'Line Fnd 1'I yd C Z first above written. 10' Jility Easement LOT 13 residing of 3 LOT 12 I 0'—' SNOW RIDGE PROPERTIES, L.L.C. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA 0 0 2184791 1�T N�co 6,751 Sq Ft I i,0 0 Printed Name: my commission expires to It N 0.1550 Acre io a00" p 0) CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR O n r10' Utility Easem�t W u + I, Mark A. Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby certify that between -r P5157tc c ess 20 MARK A. d Aug. 16 and Sept. _, 2006, this survey was made under my direct supervision, and I have platted '•v, r T the some as shown on the accompanying plat, and as described, in accordance with the provisions of CHANDLER > the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Sections 76-3-101 through through 76-3-625, M.C.A., and 10' Utility Easement I } f- )^�a0�� No. 9518ES rj the Bozeman Municipal Code. O =14.50 77.40 R� ��fC1S1fR` L=3.00 270.00,00 (R&M) Dp�O /NEER P� Dated this day of 2006.[WEST] A Mark Chandler A=11'51'15" Mae Street n Montano Registration No. 9518ES i CERTIFICATE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR SCQI¢ Feet Planning Director for the City of Bozeman, do hereby certify that the use of the exemption claimed 0 o 30 0 30 on the accompanying Amended Plot has been duly reviewed and has been found to conform to the 71 F T- T T requirements of the Subdivision and Platting Act, Section 76-3-101 et. seq., M.C.A., and the Bozeman Municipal Code. 9 0 9 Dated this day of 2006. Scale In. Metera LOT 1 N I I LOT 4 I Planning Director. City of Bozeman, Montana f� CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER 1, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat J J I I has been duly examined and that all rcol property taxes and upecial assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided have been paid. Doted this day of 2006. By: BO A � � Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County ! I CLERK AND RECORDER H I 1, Shelley Vance. Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County. Montano. do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was tiled in my office at_ o'clock_.M. this_ day of AD., 2006, and recorded in Book of Plots, on Page , records of the Clerk and EngineerSng and Surveying Inc. I Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. 1091 Stmeridge Drive•Bozeman,NIT 59718 Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(405)587-8768 Document Number By: wwwcheroneereeom-Info®chengineerecom Deputy Clerk and Recorder #06557(AP) .�U S,�,U ,�, i _- �R \` �� cwo' toy H O M E S T E A D ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Final Sketch Plan Review Comments Walton Homestead Architectural Review Committee Prepared for: Prugh& Lenon Architects,PC Lots 1&2,Block 3 Date: 06.22.06 At this time,the Walton Homestead Architectural Review Committee has approved your sketch plan application and you may submit the drawings and.required additional materials at your convenience. General Comments: We appreciate the changes that have been made to the buildings in contrast to your initial submittal. The revised site plan,with building layout and drive access, is a significant improvement to the development and will contribute to its value. We also recognize that this layout lends itself nicely to a more residential feeling for these lots. For the construction review,we would like you to include the following items with the site plan, landscape plan, floor plans and elevations: ■ Garage door cut sheets ■ Exterior light fixture cut sheets ■ Final color samples ■ Front door sample(either through photograph or cut sheet from product catalogue) When you are ready to submit your drawings for final site plan review we will need to stamp all of the required number of sets to be submitted to planning and you will need a copy of our written comments as well. Thank you. Kira E. Cey Walton Homestead Architectural Review Committee I