Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300221954011792) Z-I3131 ELI:IS-VIEW ESTATES' _ Pzelim Plan PUD 3601 Good Medicine Way Mahar Montana Homes June S, 2013 N CO W 3 ® ® c1b,°b �aPa t t "`a"..j Ej Cowl—,di Z—w FMwxt Project Name: Ell 5 l�: �s Pie<<V-V\ U File No: z 31 3 l Date Activity Staff Staff Cumulative Members Hours Hours Date Activity Staff Staff Cumulative Members Hours Hours . FILE REVIEW SHEET PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT . PRO �1File Number: File Name: �1� S ��,Pr,,) t�� c ode\, x>^ '-i�--t3 I Reference Files: Date Date Done By N/A Due Done Accept for initial review letter(5 working days after application ❑ deadline) Adequate for continued review letter(20 working days after application ❑ deadline) DRC initial week review r ❑ DRC second week review ❑ DRC final week review ❑ DRB staff report due 76 ❑ DRB meeting (o ❑ WRB review - if applicable ❑ Comments from other review agencies due ❑ Prepare project map for notices ❑ Notice to applicant and adjoiners (not less than 15 or more than 45 ❑ days before the City Commission hearing) Post notice (not less than 15 or more than 45 days before the City ❑ Commission hearing) Newspaper notice (not less than 15 or more than 45 days before the ❑ City Commission hearing) Notice to Neighborhood Coordinator(Same date as public notice.) ❑ City Commission staff report due ❑ City Commission hearing date i ❑ L.Final approval letter to applicant ❑ Recommended Recommended Approval Recommended Date N/A Approval with Conditions Denial DRC action ❑ DRB action ❑ WRB action ❑ Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Date City Commission action Date Final Site Plan due: Date of Final Site Plan approval: Date Final Site Plan approval expires: Improvements Agreement required? Yes ❑ No ❑ Date returned: Date financial guarantee received: Date financial guarantee expires: Date financial guarantee released: Date Temporary Occupancy is granted: Date Final Occupancy is granted: Suter-office original to: • • City of Bozeman Department of Community Development PO Box 1230 Bozeman MT 59771 2493825 PLATTED Page: 1 of 7 10/06/2014 11:27:33 AM Fee $49.00 Charlotte Mills - Gallatin County, MT MISC I ill�lll IIIIII III IIII IIIIIII IIIIII IIII IIII IIIII IIIII IIIIIII III IIIII IIIII IIII IIII CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ELLIS VIEW ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to allow the construction of a 9 lot residential planned unit development at 3601 Good Medicine Way; and WHEREAS,the use is to be located on property that is legally described as Lot 4A, Minor Subdivision 35C, located in the NE 1/4, Section 25, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the Planned Unit Development is contained within the City of Bozeman Department of Community Development's zoning application Z13131; and WHEREAS,the Planned Unit Development is subject to the following conditions of approval and code provisions: 1. The proffered park improvements shall be constructed as described in Plat Supplement section Q and the proposed park master plan Appendix I of the application; and in accordance with the City of Bozeman's park development standards unless a relaxation is approved. 2. The area of park as depicted on the subdivision plat shall not be reduced in size. 3. A section shall be included within the covenants to be recorded with the property which clearly identifies those provisions to which the City is a party and noting that those sections may not be revised without the City's consent. 4. No changes to the terms of the covenants which address municipal code requirements or conditions may be made without written approval of the City. 5.No property may be removed from the property owner's association without written approval of the City. 6. The covenants shall be revised to specifically state whether or not Accessory Dwelling Units Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development Z-13131 PAGE 1 OF 7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FORA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION are permitted within the development. 7. A front yard minimum setback of 20 feet to the main fagade of the house and 25 feet to the vehicle entrance to the garage or other parking area shall be provided. 8. A side yard minimum setback of-8 feet shall be provided. 9. A rear yard minimum setback of 20 feet shall be provided. 10. The yard facing Good Medicine Way is a rear yard for the purpose of determining yard setbacks. 11. Fence heights within the development may not exceed four feet. 12. Lot coverage for each lot in the Ellis View Estates shall not exceed 25% of the total area of the lot. 13. A public access easement shall be provided for those portions of the Good Medicine Way trail which lie outside of the existing public right of way. 14. A one foot wide no access strip shall be placed along the western border of Lots 6 and 9 prohibiting vehicle access to South 3rd and along the eastern border of Lots 1-4 prohibiting vehicle access to Good Medicine Way. 15. The bicycle lane on the east side of South 3rd Avenue shall be extended from its current end point at the intersection with Wagonwheel Road to the southern property line of the development. Any tapers or transitions shall occur within the public right of way past the southern property line. A connection of similar width of trail from the end of the bicycle lane to the existing adjacent trail on the south side of the property in the designated open space of Sundance Springs shall be provided. 16. Temporary irrigation or other support necessary to fully reestablish the vegetation in the open space area.disrupted by construction shall be provided for at least two years. If private improvements or vegetation within an easement are disrupted they shall be returned to essentially preconstruction condition. 17. A trail totem conforming to the City of Bozeman standard shall be provided at the beginning point of the trail within the public park identifying the trail as public access. 18. The park master plan has several incorrect references which shall be corrected prior to any final action to approve the PUD. - . 19. The remaining water rights, or cash in lieu thereof due for the property shall be paid with the filing of the final plat in accordance with Section 38.23.180, BMC. 20. Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street,prepared by'a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection,post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development Z-13131 , PAGE 2 OF 7 i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. All plans and specification shall comply with the current version(including all addenda) of the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications To Montana Public Works Standard Specifications Sixth Edition that have been adopted at the time of approval of the plans and specifications. No building permits shall be,issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements. 21. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. 22. Ditch relocation or modification: a. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks shall be contacted by the Applicant regarding the proposed relocation and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. b. The Applicant shall comply with all parts of section 38.23.060.D for any ditch relocation or modification. 23. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 24. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure with the plans and specifications infrastructure drawings submitted for engineering review. 25. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 26. All proposed private utilities to serve the subdivision shall be shown on-the public infrastructure plans and specifications. 27. Prior to acceptance of publically owned infrastructure,the contractor shall provide a Maintenance Bond with the developer/owner equal to 20% of the actual cost of the improvements to correct any deficiencies in workmanship and/or materials which are found during the two year warranty period. The City of Bozeman shall be named as dual oblige on the bond. 28. The applicant shall submit with the application for final plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval and noted code provisions have been satisfactorily addressed, and shall include a digital copy(pdf) of the entire final plan submittal. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 29. The sewer service to the Ellis View Estates planned unit development may utilize a location Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development Z-13131 PAGE 3 OF 7 i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION as offered by the Residential Owners Association in correspondence dated October 27, 2013. The public utility easement shall conform to standard City of Bozeman utility easement requirements. Upon City Commission acceptance of the new public utility easement the existing public utility easement from the end of the Good Medicine Way right of way to Peace Pipe Drive shall be released and reconveyed to the property owner. In the event the alternate public utility easement is not completed and accepted by the City, then Ellis View Estates planned unit development shall be authorized to utilize the existing public utility easement located between lots 24 and 25 of Sundance Springs Subdivision Phase IA. For either public utility easement location, an all weather access road shall b--provided to all manholes that are located outside a street or parking area. The access road to the sewer manholes shall utilize an alternative support material so that the all weather surface within the Ellis View Estates and Sundance Springs open spaces or any private lot appears as no more than a 6 foot wide gravel fines pedestrian trail. A fully vegetated all weather access is also acceptable if corner markings acceptable to the Public Works Director are provided for the roadway. Code Requirements Requiring Plan Changes: A. Private utility easements shall be provided per Section 38.23.060.13 and depicted on the final PUD plan and final plat. B. The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted. Proposed main extensions shall be noted as future work. The following code provisions are identified for informational purposes as the project moves forward. These will need to be addressed as part of the final site plan application or other process step: a. Section 38.20.060 requires the applicant to submit a final plan within 12 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. The director will set the required number of copies. This is the final step in the site zoning entitlement process. An application form and fee is required in addition to the final plan set submittal. b. Section 38.28.060.A.3 requires a sign permit to be obtained prior to establishing a subdivision identification sign or other permanent sign. c. Section 38.20.060 states that the project must be completed within two years of final approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year,the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Community Development. Director. d. Section 38.39.030 requires that the applicant shall provide for private improvements certification by the architect, landscape architect, engineer and other applicable professionals Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development Z-13131 PAGE 4 OF 7 I ' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION that all improvements including, but not limited to landscaping, ADA accessibility requirements,private infrastructure, or other requirement elements were installed in accordance with the approved site plan,plans and specifications. For your information. This will be required prior to occupancy following construction. e. All construction activities shall comply with section 38.39.020.A.2 of the Unified Development Code. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. f. Section 38.39.030 requires that all infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property, except where a relaxation was provided by the PUD. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the final plat for the subdivision. g. Storm water Master Plan: Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm water Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the storm water receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information(particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical storm water detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a storm water maintenance plan. h. Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm Water Management Permit (SMP) must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Site Plan Approval. The SMP requires submittals of an application form and a Storm Water Management Plan in compliance with the City of Bozeman's Storm Water Management Ordinance#1763. The SMP is independent of any other storm water permitting required from the State of Montana, and does not fulfill the requirement to obtain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP) if they are required for this development. A copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI), the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and the approval letter from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality shall be submitted to the City. E11is View Estates Planned Unit Development Z-13131 PAGE 5 OF 7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Any storm water ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Storm water ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision(e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot,the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot. i. The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 38.39.020.A.I of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall.be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT.HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted conditions of approval and code provisions for the Conditional Use Permit shall be binding upon the undersigned owner of the subject property, and successors or assigns, as approved by the Bozeman City Commission. DATED THIS S�� DAY OF SG��G►'!��r ,20 Ellis Vie'v Estates Planned Unit''Develo meat Z-13131 PAGE 6 OF 7 I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER A, Signature Printed Name STATE OF ) :ss County ofj&t6& 1 ) On this �S day of , 2014, before me a Notary Public of the State of personally appeared known to me to be the person that executed the fore oing instru ent, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) L t721 !`YN N 6,21 rTaN OFFICIAL STAMP (Printed Name Here) LORI LYNN BRrMN Notary Public for the State of NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Residing at Qt 16V-9791 COMMISSION NO.930771 MY COMMISSION EVIRES,IUY 2$2018 My Commission Expi s: .-1 R-2p1R (Use 4 digits for expiration year) Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development Z-13131 PAGE 7 OF 7 i i I I I i Lms CITOF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 401-582-2210 .. 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net November 6, 2013 Mr. Mike Balch C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 RE: Ellis View Estates Prelim PUD Application #Z-13131 Dear Mr. Balch: The above-referenced Planned Unit Development was approved with conditions by the City Commission on November 4, 2013. The approval included the requested relaxations 1-4 and 6-8. The decision on the application was based on the fact that, with conditions and code provisions, the proposal complies with the requirements of Chapter 38 of the BMC,will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Bozeman Community Plan. A complete and signed final PUD plan application and copy of the attached executed and recorded document which notes all conditions of approval and code provisions must be submitted to the Department of Community Development within 12 months, or by November 4, 2014. It is recommended that the final documentation be submitted at least two months in advance of the expiration of approval on November 4, 2014. The submittal must be accompanied by a written narrative explaining how all of the conditions of approval and code provisions have been addressed. If the Final PUD Plan cannot be submitted within the 12 month period as previously referenced, an extension may be requested in accordance with Section 38.20.060.A.2. The final conditions of approval are as follows: 1. The proffered park improvements shall be constructed as described in Plat Supplement section Q and the proposed park master plan Appendix I of the application; and in accordance with the City of Bozeman's park development standards unless a relaxation is approved. 2. The area of park as depicted on the subdivision plat shall not be reduced in size. 3. A section shall be included within the covenants to be recorded with the property which clearly identifies those provisions to which the City is a party and noting that those sections may not be revised without the City's consent. 4. No changes to the terms of the covenants which address municipal code requirements or conditions may be made without written approval of the City. Development Review Division Policy and Planning Division Building Division I 5. No property may be removed from the property owner's association without written approval of the City. 6. The covenants shall be revised to specifically state whether or not Accessory Dwelling Units are permitted within the development. 7. A front yard minimum setback of 20 feet to the main fagade of the house and 25 feet to the vehicle entrance to the garage or other parking area shall be provided. 8. A side yard minimum setback of 8 feet shall be provided. 9. A rear yard minimum setback of 20 feet shall be provided. 10. The yard facing Good Medicine Way is a rear yard for the purpose of determining yard setbacks. 11. Fence heights within the development may not exceed four feet. 12. Lot coverage for each lot in the Ellis View Estates shall not exceed 25%of the total area of the lot. 13. A public access easement shall be provided for those portions of the Good Medicine Way trail which lie outside of the existing public right of way. 14. A one foot wide no access strip shall be placed along the western border of Lots 6 and 9 prohibiting vehicle access to South 3rd and along the eastern border of Lots 1-4 prohibiting vehicle access to Good Medicine Way. 15. The bicycle lane on the east side of South 3rd Avenue shall be extended from its current end point at the intersection with Wagonwheel Road to the southern property line of the development. Any tapers or transitions shall occur within the public right of way past the southern property line. A connection of similar width of trail from the end of the bicycle lane to the existing adjacent trail on the south side of the property in the designated open space of Sundance Springs shall be provided. 16. Temporary irrigation or other support necessary to fully reestablish the vegetation in the open space area disrupted by construction shall be provided for at least two years. If private improvements or vegetation within an easement are disrupted they shall be returned to essentially preconstruction condition. 17. A trail totem conforming to the City of Bozeman standard shall be provided at the beginning point of the trail within the public park identifying the trail as public access. 18. The park master plan has several incorrect references which shall be corrected prior to any final action to approve the PUD. 19. The remaining water rights, or cash in lieu thereof due for the property shall be paid with the filing of the final plat in accordance with Section 38.23.180, BMC. 20. Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre- construction conference has been conducted. All plans and specification shall comply with the current version(including all addenda) of the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Page 2 I V I Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications To Montana Public Works Standard Specifications Sixth Edition that have been adopted at the time of approval of the plans and specifications. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements. 21. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. 22. Ditch relocation or modification: a. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks shall be contacted by the Applicant regarding the proposed relocation and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. b. The Applicant shall comply with all parts of section 38.23.060.D for any ditch relocation or modification. 23. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 24. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure with the plans and specifications infrastructure drawings submitted for engineering review. 25. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 26. All proposed private utilities to serve the subdivision shall be shown on the public infrastructure plans and specifications. 27. Prior to acceptance of publically owned infrastructure,the contractor shall provide a Maintenance Bond with the developer/owner equal to 20% of the actual cost of the improvements to correct any deficiencies in workmanship and/or materials which are found during the two year warranty period. The City of Bozeman shall be named as dual oblige on the bond. 28. The applicant shall submit with the application for final plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval and noted code provisions have been satisfactorily addressed, and shall include a digital copy (pdf) of the entire final plan submittal. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 29. The sewer service to the Ellis View Estates planned unit development may utilize a location as offered by the Residential Owners Association in correspondence dated October 27, 2013. The public utility easement shall conform to standard City of Bozeman utility easement requirements. Upon City Commission acceptance of the new public utility easement the existing public utility easement from the end of the Good Medicine Way right of way to Peace Pipe Drive shall be released and reconveyed to the property owner. In the event the alternate public utility easement is not completed and accepted by the City, then Ellis View Estates planned unit development shall be authorized to utilize the existing public utility easement located between lots 24 and 25 of Sundance Springs Subdivision Phase IA. Page 3 • • For either public utility easement location, an all weather access road shall be provided to all manholes that are located outside a street or parking area. The access road to the sewer manholes shall utilize an alternative support material so that the all weather surface within the Ellis View Estates and Sundance Springs open spaces or any private lot appears as no more than a 6 foot wide gravel fines pedestrian trail. A fully vegetated all weather access is also acceptable if corner markings acceptable to the Public Works Director are provided for the roadway. Code Requirements Requiring Plan Changes: A. Private utility easements shall be provided per Section 38.23.060.B and depicted on the final PUD plan and final plat. B. The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted. Proposed main extensions shall be noted as future work. The following code provisions are identified for informational purposes as the project moves forward. These will need to be addressed as part of the final site plan application or other process step: a. Section 38.20.060 requires the applicant to submit a final plan within 12 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by.the Department of Community Development. The director will set the required number of copies. This is the final step in the site zoning entitlement process. An application form and fee is required in addition to the final plan set submittal. b. Section 38.28.060.A.3 requires a sign permit to be obtained prior to establishing a subdivision identification sign or other permanent sign. c. Section 38.20.060 states that the project must be completed within two years of final approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year, the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Community Development Director. For your information, Code requirement. d. Section 38.39.030 requires that the applicant shall provide for private improvements certification by the architect, landscape architect, engineer and other applicable professionals that all improvements including,but not limited to landscaping, ADA accessibility requirements, private infrastructure, or other requirement elements were installed in accordance with the approved site plan, plans and specifications. For your information. This will be required prior to occupancy following construction. e. All construction activities shall comply with section 38.39.020.A.2 of the Unified Development Code. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. f. Section 38.39.030 requires that all infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2)public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard Page 4 frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property, except where a relaxation was provided by the PUD. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the final plat for the subdivision. g. Storm water Master Plan: Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm water Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the storm water receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical storm water detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a storm water maintenance plan. h. Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm Water Management Permit(SMP) must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Site Plan Approval. The SMP requires submittals of an application form and a Storm Water Management Plan in compliance with the City of Bozeman's Storm Water Management Ordinance#1763. The SMP is independent of any other storm water permitting required from the State of Montana, and does not fulfill the requirement to obtain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) if they are required for this development. A copy of the Notice of Intent(NOI), the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP), and the approval letter from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality shall be submitted to the City. Any storm water ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Storm water ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot. i. The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 38.39.020.A.1 of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. Please feel free to contact me at 582-2260 if you have any questions regarding the application or the review process in general. Page 5 Respectfully, p Y, Chris Saunders, AICP Department of Community Development cc: Mahar Montana Homes, 1627 W. Main Street, #370, Bozeman MT 59718 File Page 6 Inter-office original to: • • City of Bozeman Department of Community Development PO Box 1230 Bozeman MT 59771 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ELLIS VIEW ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BOZEMAN, MONTANA WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to allow the construction of a 9 lot residential planned unit development at 3601 Good Medicine Way; and WHEREAS, the use is to be located on property that is legally described as Lot 4A, Minor Subdivision 35C, located in the NE 1/4, Section 25, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS,the Planned Unit Development is contained within the City of Bozeman Department of Community Development's zoning application Z13131; and WHEREAS,the Planned Unit Development is subject to the following conditions of approval and code provisions: 1. The proffered park improvements shall be constructed as described in Plat Supplement section Q and the proposed park master plan Appendix I of the application; and in accordance with the City of Bozeman's park development standards unless a relaxation is approved. 2. The area of park as depicted on the subdivision plat shall not be reduced in size. 3. A section shall be included within the covenants to be recorded with the property which clearly identifies those provisions to which the City is a party and noting that those sections may not be revised without the City's consent. 4.No changes to the terms of the covenants which address municipal code requirements or conditions may be made without written approval of the City. 5. No property may be removed from the property owner's association without written approval of the City. 6. The covenants shall be revised to specifically state whether or not Accessory Dwelling Units Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 1 OF 7 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION are permitted within the development. 7. A front yard minimum setback of 20 feet to the main fagade of the house and 25 feet to the vehicle entrance to the garage or other parking area shall be provided. 8. A side yard minimum setback of 8 feet shall be provided. 9. A rear yard minimum setback of 20 feet shall be provided. 10. The yard facing Good Medicine Way is a rear yard for the purpose of determining yard setbacks. 11. Fence heights within the development may not exceed four feet. 12. Lot coverage for each lot in the Ellis View Estates shall not exceed 25% of the total area of the lot. 13. A public access easement shall be provided for those portions of the Good Medicine Way trail which lie outside of the existing public right of way. 14. A one foot wide no access strip shall be placed along the western border of Lots 6 and 9 prohibiting vehicle access to South 3rd and along the eastern border of Lots 1-4 prohibiting vehicle access to Good Medicine Way. 15. The bicycle lane on the east side of South 3rd Avenue shall be extended from its current end point at the intersection with Wagonwheel Road to the southern property line of the development. Any tapers or transitions shall occur within the public right of way past the southern property line. A connection of similar width of trail from the end of the bicycle lane to the existing adjacent trail on the south side of the property in the designated open space of Sundance Springs shall be provided. 16. Temporary irrigation or other support necessary to fully reestablish the vegetation in the open space area disrupted by construction shall be provided for at least two years. If private improvements or vegetation within an easement are disrupted they shall be returned to essentially preconstruction condition. 17. A trail totem conforming to the City of Bozeman standard shall be provided at the beginning point of the trail within the public park identifying the trail as public access. 18. The park master plan has several incorrect references which shall be corrected prior to any final action to approve the PUD. 19. The remaining water rights, or cash in lieu thereof due for the property shall be paid with the filing of the final plat in accordance with Section 38.23.180, BMC. 20. Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection,post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 2 OF 7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. All plans and specification shall comply with the current version (including all addenda) of the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications To Montana Public Works Standard Specifications Sixth Edition that have been adopted at the time of approval of the plans and specifications. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements. 21. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. 22. Ditch relocation or modification: a. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks shall be contacted by the Applicant regarding the proposed relocation and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. b. The Applicant shall comply with all parts of section 38.23.060.D for any ditch relocation or modification. 23. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 24. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure with the plans and specifications infrastructure drawings submitted for engineering review. 25. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 26. All proposed private utilities to serve the subdivision shall be shown on the public infrastructure plans and specifications. 27. Prior to acceptance of publically owned infrastructure, the contractor shall provide a Maintenance Bond with the developer/owner equal to 20%of the actual cost of the improvements to correct any deficiencies in workmanship and/or materials which are found during the two year warranty period. The City of Bozeman shall be named as dual oblige on the bond. 28. The applicant shall submit with the application for final plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval and noted code provisions have been satisfactorily addressed, and shall include a digital copy (pdf) of the entire final plan submittal. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat,plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 29. The sewer service to the Ellis View Estates planned unit development may udlize a location Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 3 OF 7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION as offered by the Residential Owners Association in correspondence dated October 27, 2013. The public utility easement shall conform to standard City of Bozeman utility easement requirements. Upon City Commission acceptance of the new public utility easement the existing public utility easement from the end of the Good Medicine Way right of way to Peace Pipe Drive shall be released and reconveyed to the property owner. In the event the alternate public utility easement is not completed and accepted by the City, then Ellis View Estates planned unit development shall be authorized to utilize the existing public utility easement located between lots 24 and 25 of Sundance Springs Subdivision Phase IA. For either public utility easement location, an all weather access road shall be provided to all manholes that are located outside a street or parking area. The access road to the sewer manholes shall utilize an alternative support material so that the all weather surface within the Ellis View Estates and Sundance Springs open spaces or any private lot appears as no more than a 6 foot wide gravel fines pedestrian trail. A fully vegetated all weather access is also acceptable if corner markings acceptable to the Public Works Director are provided for the roadway. Code Requirements Requiring Plan Changes: A. Private utility easements shall be provided per Section 38.23.060.13 and depicted on the final PUD plan and final plat. B. The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted. Proposed main extensions shall be noted as future work. The following code provisions are identified for informational purposes as the project moves forward. These will need to be addressed as part of the final site plan application or other process step: a. Section 38.20.060 requires the applicant to submit a final plan within 12 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. The director will set the required number of copies. This is the final step in the site zoning entitlement process. An application form and fee is required in addition to the final plan set submittal. b. Section 38.28.060.A.3 requires a sign permit to be obtained prior to establishing a subdivision identification sign or other permanent sign. c. Section 38.20.060 states that the project must be completed within two years of final approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year,the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Community Development Director. d. Section 38.39.030 requires that the applicant shall provide for private improvements certification by the architect, landscape architect, engineer and other applicable professionals Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 4 OF 7 0 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION that all improvements including, but not limited to landscaping, ADA accessibility requirements, private infrastructure, or other requirement elements were installed in accordance with the approved site plan,plans and specifications. For your information. This will be required prior to occupancy following construction. e. All construction activities shall comply with section 38.39.020.A.2 of the Unified Development Code. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. f. Section 38.39.030 requires that all infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property, except where a relaxation was provided by the PUD. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the final plat for the subdivision. g. Storm water Master Plan: Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm water Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the storm water receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical storm water detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a storm water maintenance plan. h. Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm Water Management Permit (SMP) must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Site Plan Approval. The SMP requires submittals of an application form and a Storm Water Management Plan in compliance with the City of Bozeman's Storm Water Management Ordinance#1763. The SMP is independent of any other storm water permitting required from the State of Montana, and does not fulfill the requirement to obtain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) if they are required for this development. A copy of the Notice of Intent(NOI),the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and the approval letter from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality shall be submitted to the City. Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 5 OF 7 0 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Any storm water ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Storm water ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision(e.g., general lot runoff,public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot,the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot. i. The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 38.39.020.A.1 of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted conditions of approval and code provisions for the Conditional Use Permit shall be binding upon the undersigned owner of the subject property, and successors or assigns, as approved by the Bozeman City Commission. DATED THIS DAY OF , 20 Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 6 OF 7 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER Signature Printed Name STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2013, before me a Notary Public of the State of Montana, personally appeared , known to me to be the person that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) (Printed Name Here) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at My Commission Expires: (Use 4 digits for expiration year) Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development PAGE 7 OF 7 • A lication#Z-13 3,1 130 Ellis,View Estates.Planned)Unit Development ®Q • An application for preliminary planned - unit development on 5.01-acres R-1 • Nine single-household residential lots,2 RS open space lots and a park land. 3 J 4 • Not within an overlay district Subject • Recently annexed,Resolution No.4415 / Property • Zoned R-S(Residential Suburban)a planned unit development review is RS required for new development 4 ` • Subsequent preliminary plat depends on the PUD approval jn- Staff report is available with the agenda on www.bozeman.net • • 1 Application,#Z-13131 • Ellis,View Estates Planned Unit Development no A. PUD Code Provisions: 1. Section 38.08.010.A.1,BMC,states,"All new subdivision and site plan developments in this district shall be subject to the provisions of article 20 of this chapter,pertaining to planned unit development,and shall be developed in compliance with the adopted city growth policy." 2. Setbacks • Front yard 20,25 to garage • Side yard 8 • Rear yard 20 3. Lot coverage&floor area—25%, no floor area minimum besides I.B.C. 4. Lot area&width—Established through the PUD,see drawing. 5. Minimum densities—None. • I • 2 • • A p p lication#Z%13131 EIIis,.Vew,Estates,Planned,'Unit Development ews vow Esras 'sue1Vws1ow Bf/NG AN gqNAIfNOCO PWT O!LOT IA,MINOR T��//BppMSION N0.55-C nvxa LOCATED IN THE NE I/L•SECTION 15,I.I S..R.5 C.0!P.Y.M.,C.ILLATIN COUNTY,YDNTANA 1 1 DOSTN0 ZONM H$)COUNTy) v.�a v a�: I__��r,ra..•c u-.a'..'�'.......n m.u�M r... \`\ L u '' V ����f�I I�,� tea' �� �\ 1 `\ �• `\ ,.- ��® v UKPLATIED II �! Q'.tn. -'�•• .-K.,,.. L, I ---•SOT 4P f `\ t a a \ " 'Lo„3 a \` `w IX ZOAM R-S ,mom.6 ,.CLOD 7 I\r `\p OPENNSP<vmCE.+., iC0 a/ ti 7� 'r..v.�•a me OprN y a...,..-.O •! l OPEN SPnCE nr am sc� fJ ,Act / • • 3 Application#Z-13,13;1 • Ellis View Estates Planned,Unit Development PLI 6 I A~ Planned Unit Development -� - (PUD)allows flexibility in compliance to standards. Application requests 8 relaxations to standards. UnannexeG�� o 1 -Parks ki, (R•S) U nannexed � � } —WWI, [� o 2-Sewer IJ •s.:Tr._ r' 0 5-Streets F �t Subject Property R-S i • I • 4 Avl pplications#Z-13430 13 Ellis Vii ew Estates Planned Unit Development 1)Section 38.27.060.A Park Frontage to have less than 100%direct street frontage.Site plan criterion 8,Open Space,p.12 2)Section 38.24.090.D.3 Access—Separation between the intersections of S.3rd Ave and Ellis View Loop to be approximately 2 feet closer together than normal.Site plan criterion 6,Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p.11 3)Section 38.24.050.A.1 Street right of way width and construction standards—To provide a narrower right-of-way width for Ellis View Loop of 53 feet.Site plan criterion 6,Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p.11 4)Section 38.24.060.A Street Improvement Standards—to have a smaller curve radii on a smaller street.Site plan criterion 6,Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p. 11 5)Design standard for required all weather access to sewer manhole—provide manholes which do not have an all weather access road.Site plan criterion 12,Provision for Utilities,p. 13 6)Section 38.23.070.A.3 Municipal water,sanitary sewer,and storm sewer systems—To not install the master planned trunk sewer along S.3rd Avenue.Sewer access is proposed along an existing sewer easement to the southeast.Site plan criterion 12,Provision for Utilities,p. 13 7)Section 38.24.010.A Streets—To not construct the S.3rd Avenue road cross section to the standards normally required for a collector street.Site plan criteria 5 Traffic and Parking Conditions p.10 and 6,Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p.11. 8)Section 38.24.080.A Sidewalks—To construct a gravel fines trail along Good Medicine Way in lies• of a standard concrete sidewalk.Site plan criterion 6,Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p.11 • Section 2 of the staff report on page S 5 • 0 Application#ZI 13130 • ElIis,View Estates,PI'anned)Unit Development .art:v�w�;M•,v ra'� VIEW P�/�WRY q.AT O� F/BEING"/S VIEW ESTATES S[/BDMSION HE qqY!"DED PWTT 0!LOT 4A,Y/NOp SyBpIVISfON N0.J5-C �y aoc LOCATED IN INf NC 1/A.SECTION T5, 1.1 S.'B.5 C.07 Y.Y.Y.,WLLA TIN COUNTY.MONTANA - f( LOT 3 \ _ LOT Q � �1 1 I `•°r=r=.-rt •»mod-'iitr____ \ \\\\\ so LOT 1 b ;� F���� �$N• %j 1 I' LOT 2 / i�LOT§9n V .T I) \ \ \\ uNa�L°TTED �._,1-Oa (Cary) LOT 6 LOT 7 OPEN SPACE Z s f o \ --OP PN 1) Section 38.27.060.A Park Frontage to have less than 100% direct street frontage. • Site plan criterion 8, Open Space,p. 12 6 • UNIT /� /' -b'i Y,4 I'm � '1 � 8.:..♦� ail�1 . y�.n Lei l5 'lT6.. • 7 Application;#Z-113030 93 M Ellis View Estates,Planned],Unit Development 6' II'&YfarJ Sees 7tl0t#L �ttl2ngle'e Sale II' *W A&I ew. .f S .S f �t 1190—IMEIDEIE ueudanneisatue IIEIENEIIEIOEIIISI Ic ij S lane Option Sidewalks✓Bike(Boulevard Both Sides•No Parking RO Rephrmds=90' i •TDYY siOIYCi®rsGea RM Requirements=go, My Be M..11Terrih Regd- I Pteline S.ip - ME Vie 93bie• n'OiiStne 11'=ii51a. TSvifV VJe- I - 9 � 9 bM1W � T 2)Section 38.24.090.D.3 Access—Separation between the intersections of S. 3rd Ave • and Ellis View Loop to be approximately 2 feet closer together than normal. Site plan criterion 6, Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p. 11 3) Section 38.24.050.A.1 Street right of way width and construction standards—To provide a narrower right-of-way width for Ellis View Loop of 53 feet. Site plan. criterion 6, Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p. 11 4)Section 38.24.060.A Street Improvement Standards—to have a smaller curve radii on a smaller street. Site plan criterion 6, Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p. 11 7) Section 38.24.010.A Streets—To not construct the S. 3rd Avenue road cross section to the standards normally required for a collector street. Site plan criteria 5 Traffic and Parking Conditions p.10 and 6, Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p. 11. 8)Section 38.24.080.A Sidewalks—To construct a gravel fines trail along Good Medicine Way in lieu of a standard concrete sidewalk. Site plan criterion 6, Ped/vehicle Ingress and Egress,p.11 • 8 • Application#Z-13)13)1 130 EIIis.View Estates.Planned)Unit Development no n a" ELL/3 VIEW 3 ATESM3fON c.��tt BfIHC AN q,YCNOT" P-,OC L0'u R. .MINOR SUuBDMSION N0.SS-C BCCTTON 75. T.1 5., 5 L OI P.N.Y.,OILG TIN COUNTY.MONTANA 1 Im SMTM ZONM R-sm LLT>a. \\\ `\\ LOT Ia S LOT t -�1 TV- LLV{ I�` iiOTB UI:PL>TTEO �_ \ . ZOAW&R-S LOT 6 LOT 7� IWi� -- O n . .v-.--...�.-.tee ...... ... _ i 9 Appli'cationj#Z-1'303;1 13 Elli's�View,Estates,Planned Unit Development s es'eWLe rPadig 8'D&ft lap mi,*VLa TPmtmg 85'Bak-d 5'SW. 5' S' I, 31'8addCm51o8a*dCub _I 2 Lanes Sidewalks/Parking/Boulevard Both Sides Typical Section — Ellis View Loop Model 10 Application#ZI313;1 EII sj,Vi;ew.EstatesPlanned Unit Development J'266 SI'Itl\fS, -v..usr I'l 1.15E L\ Id IVA w Y I �� ��-t�•,+� i� ;�i +� aY.+1 tQ'''�� fir_ •'�... • 11 Application.#Z-131.31 Ellis,View Estate_s�Pla_nne, Unit Development ���, L U I b1 , N28<07'16"W ou ION 250.15' (R&M) r �,ab' LOT 27 ,e.Joo w.n OF EOZEMAN LOT 26 30' S ITARY SEWER � w �\ _ ASEMENT '� dJoo sJ.«.<. 42.60'• / Q 3.07' (R&M) _N226.,, ��o� ��� / R 30' \ JT.66• / 15' - LOT 25 i, Q/ / 15.82 a«oy. 4. LOT 24 \ / Q� LOT / N6 <45'51"E \ u.3B.231 At 3 LOT 23 o<:«.. LOT 15 o-' Haan w.n. EN SPACE e _ ✓ N6J16'06 LOT 14 .,,.J6• t�.�" ,6,033 w.l,. 0.37 acre. i I I I 12 • Application#Z-13131 Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development --+� —� Existingeasement ;,�� IY +" between 'zw;4"w 4 I •x �' l - Proposed Easement / 5) Design standard for required all weather access to sewer manhole—provide manholes which do not have an all weather access road. Site plan criterion 12, Provision for Utilities,p. 13 6) Section 38.23.070.A.3 Municipal water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer systems— To not install the master planned trunk sewer along S. 3rd Avenue. Sewer access is proposed along an existing sewer easement to the southeast. Site plan criterion 12, Provision for Utilities,p. 13 i 13 0 Application#Z-13,131 13 Ellis,View Estates,Planned Unit Development 0 i i o^ � ` V 1 �c oo" O Ci 8 inch V�flinch ,�o• G oo� G t 4r ad,000 B in h OM1 � SUNDANCE 0 n G,00" SPRINGS z RE\LAINDER TRACT = \on z G` III;\OR SUB.SS n i 14 • b'4 ®® Public Comment • Numerous comment letters have been received concerning this application and were provided to the Commission prior to this hearing. • Additional comments were received after the packet deadline and have been forwarded to the Commission for this hearing. Recommendation M • Staff and the Development Review Committee recommend conditional approval of the preliminary plat application subject to the findings and conditions of approval listed in the staff report. • Alternative two of the revised cover memo is the recommended action 15 93 M • Recommendation No "Having reviewed the application NewCondnlon "The sewer service to the Ellis View Estates planned unit materials,considered public development may utilize a location as offered by the comment including the offer of the Residential Owners Association in correspondence dated g October27,2013.The public utility easement shall conform to alternative public utility easement, standard City of Bozeman utility easement requirements. Upon City Commission acceptance of the new public utility and considered all of the easement the existing public utility easement from the end of the Good Medicine Way right of way to Peace Pipe Drive shall information presented, I hereby be released and roconveyedto the properly owner.Inthe adopt the findings presented in the event the alternate public utility easement is not completed and accepted by the City,then Ellis View Estates planned unit staff report for application Z-13131 development shall be authorized to utilize the existing public utility easement located between lots 24 and 25 of Sundance and move to approve the Springs Subdivision Phase IA. preliminary planned unit For either public utility easement location,an all weather development including requested access road shall be provided to all manholes that are located outside a street or parking area.The access road to the sewer relaxations 1-4 and 6-8, subject to manholes shall utilize an alternative support material so that all applicable code provisions and the all weather surface within the Ellis View Estates and PP P Sundance Springs open spaces or any private lot appears as conditions recommended in no more than a 6 foot wide gravel Imes pedestrian trail.A fully vegetated all weather access is also acceptable if comer Alternative Two of the revised cover markings acceptable to the Public Works Director are memo. provided for the roadway." 16 r Application Q-13131 Ellis,View Estates,Planned Unit Development Ile w • 17 4 ..}., Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission Y Y FROM: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager Wendy Thomas, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ellis View Estates, a preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) in conjunction with a major subdivision with nine residential lots, two open space parcels, and a park parcel. Eight relaxations to development standards are requested as part of the project. 3601 Good Medicine Way— File No. Z-13131 REVISED MATERIALS COVER MEMO MEETING DATE: November 4, 2013 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action (quasi-judicial) • RECOMMENDATION: The City Commission conduct the public hearing and with consent of the applicant continue the item to December 9, 2013. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Having reviewed the application materials, considered public comment including the offer of the alternative public utility easement, and considered all of the information presented,I hereby move to continue this hearing to December 9,2013 to allow additional time to complete the process to obtain an alternative public utility easement and to revise conditions of approval accordingly." Staff report page references: conditions of approval, page 5; requested relaxations, page 8; review criteria and findings,page 9; code provisions, page 7, 23. BACKGROUND: Many of the public comments on this project have applied to the installation of a sewer main within an existing public utility easement. The existing easement location is considered to be disruptive and undesirable by the property owner of the adjacent property through which the easement passes. An offer has been received from the adjacent property owner to allow an alternate easement location. Staff believes the new location is beneficial to the applicant, land owner, and the City. A copy of the new location and the offer has been provided to the Commission. This issue is discussed under site plan review criterion 12, see page 14 of the staff report. This new alignment is the one discussed as alternative two. The new easement would make requested relaxation Number Five no longer necessary as there would be no manholes on the new alignment which would require an access road. The new easement would make condition Number 32 (see page 8 of the staff report) also unnecessary. It is important to note that this is an offer for an alternative easement and not the easement itself. The receipt of the easement offer is welcome and the new alignment is beneficial. The additional time would allow an opportunity for the easement to be completed and the reconveyance to be prepared. This would significantly simplify any conditions required for action on this item. REVISED ALTERNATIVES) This is the staff preferred option. COduct the public hearing and then continue to December 9, 2013 to allow time to complete the offered easement and reconveyance of the existing easement. This will reduce the number of questions and contingencies to be addressed with the conditions of approval. Staff would then be able to • provide a recommendation with fewer conditions and contingencies for City Commission final action. This option would require written consent from the applicant to continue the subdivision review process beyond the 60 working days required by statute. The 60 day time for review ends on November 15, 2013. As of the writing of this memo staff had not been able to discuss this option with the land owner. We continue to reach out and hope to have a clear answer prior to the Commission meeting on Monday. 2) Approve the preliminary planned unit development with conditions and code requirements identified by staff including approval of Relaxations 1-4 and 6-8; omitting conditions 29-32 (which address requirements in the event that the relaxations are not granted), and adding an additional condition to reflect the proposal by the Sundance Springs Homeowners Associate to provide an alignment for a public utility easement to serve Ellis View Estates to be located between Ellis View Loop and Peace Pipe Drive as shown on a letter dated October 27, 2013 from the Sundance Springs Residential Owners Association. This new condition should be numbered sequential to the last condition and shall read: i "The sewer service to the Ellis View Estates planned unit development may utilize a location as offered by the Residential Owners Association in correspondence dated j October 27, 2013. The public utility easement shall conform to standard City of Bozeman utility easement requirements. Upon City Commission acceptance of the new public utility easement the existing public utility easement from the end of the Good Medicine Way right of way to Peace Pipe Drive shall be released and reconveyed to the property • owner. In the event the alternate public utility easement is not completed and accepted by the City, then Ellis View Estates planned unit development shall be authorized to utilize the existing public utility easement located between lots 24 and 25 of Sundance Springs Subdivision Phase ]A. For either public utility easement location, an all weather access road shall be provided to all manholes that are located outside a street or parking area. The access road to the sewer manholes shall utilize an alternative support material so that the all weather surface within the Ellis View Estates and Sundance Springs open spaces or any private lot appears as no more than a 6 foot wide gravel fines pedestrian trail. A fully vegetated all weather access is also acceptable if corner markings acceptable to the Public Works Director are provided for the roadway." If the Commission decides to use this alternative staff suggest the following motion language: "Having reviewed the application materials, considered public comment including the offer of the alternative public utility easement, and considered all of the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application Z-13131 and move to approve the preliminary planned unit development including requested relaxations 1-4 and 6-8, subject to all applicable code provisions and conditions recommended in Alternative Two of the revised cover memo. " 2) Make alternative findings and approve the preliminary planned unit development with • revised conditions and code requirements. 3) Make alternative findings and deny the preliminary planned unit development FISCAL EFFECTS: NoneOntified. • Attachments: Oct 27, 2013 letter, all other attachments were provided previously • Report compiled on: November 1, 2013 I 10/2712013 TU: Interested Persons FROM: Sundance Springs Residential Owners Association RE: Ellis View MaSub1PUD and P-13019 and Z13131 The undersigned Board Of Directors of the Sundance Springs Residential Owners Association: acting under the authority of our covenants and by-laws, assure the interested parties we will grant an easement for the purpose of installing a sanitary sewer line as shown on the attached Exhibit. This action would take place after the proposed Ellis View MaSub/PUD has been approved t;y the City Commission. We further understand the developer intends to amend the plat of our open space to properly vacate the existing easement, also identified on the attached Exhibit. r' f • Brad O' rosky Cory Lawrence Chairman. Board Member Phil Gouevia Gars, B ' mer Secretary Boa rnber Tim Dietz - Board Member EXHIBIT A 30' EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER LINE — CITY OF BOZEMAN AREA OF EASEMENT = 7932 Sq. Ff. 359 s 34 8732'3(r LOT 7 OPOSED STREET, \\*F'& S.)NLI"nCL iSA83 Sq.Ft. SIDEWALK, SAN. SEWER, AND 7, WATER MAINS IN 54'PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY LOT 4 16.8"Sq. Ft. or. '-r59 IT Existing 30' Sanitary Sewer Easement to be Abandoned PEN SP-AL LOT 5 —--.- /1 11,957 Sq. Ft. ai.&oir 34.519 Sq.FL Ke PROPOSED TRAIL P 13,174 Sq.FLI-L- AND WASTE STATION iOWSED MAIL -LIVERY LOCATION PARK Fnd RPO, Easement 18,184 Sq. Ft. ;z 311il.E fIvIslon No.35-A -PRO-- _jW D3 X. SANITARY SEWER Sa9.4O'OO DANCE SPRING'S T V ------- ... j L114AS, I A d-PPOC 3111 ES IF 01100C Trail —CE -IC L N S-L:N[--ANCE Proposed 53* x 41' , r 'T SIiS r-iA.'-:,E IA CSArch Culvert with FE V' i 7. Fill to bring grade 1 foot ve culvert SU111DANCE SPRING'S Existing Centerline of Ditch-," Proposed 30, Sanitary Sewer . ........ Easement Scale In Feet 9,932 Sq. Ft. 60 0 60 ------ 18 0 18 Scale In Meters C VTHW I TOTAL AREA OF PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN OPEN SPACE = 7,932 SO. FT. I I . i TOTAL AREA OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT M Engineering and Surveying Inc. BE ABANDONED = 11.957 SO. FT. 1091 Sl—idgeDrie-Bo sn.NIT59718 Ph-(40515117-1115-F.(4061587-9768 #11489 — ISheet I Of,'I w-rhp.vner-com-infufthengim-c Page 1 of 29 • Z-13131, Staff Re ort or the Ellis Kew Estates Preliminary P .f y Planned Unit Development Date: City Commission public hearing is on November 4, 2013 Project Description: A preliminary Planned Unit Development in conjunction.with a major subdivision with nine residential lots, two open space parcels, and a park parcel. Eight relaxations to development standards are requested as part of the project. Project Location: 3601 Good Medicine Way. It is legally described as Lot 4A, Minor Subdivision 35C, located in the NE 1/4, Section 25, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions Recommended Motion: Having reviewed the application materials, considered public comment, and considered all of the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application Z-13131 and move to approve the preliminary planned unit development with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions and including relaxations 1-4 and 6-8. Report Date: Thursday, October 31, 2013 Staff Contact: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION1 -MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2- RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL....................................... 5 SECTION 3 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAN CORRECTIONS ................. 8 SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................ 8 SECTION 5 —REQUESTED RELAXATIONS ....................................................................... 5 SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS........................................................................................... 9 Applicable Plan Review Criteria, Section 38.19.100, BMC...............................................9 Applicable Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria, Section 38.19.100, BMC.............. 18 Applicable Planned Unit Development Review Criteria, Section 38.20.090.E, BMC.....21 APPENDIX A—ADVISORY CODE CITATIONS...............................................................24 APPENDIX B—PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY...............................26 APPENDIX C—DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND..............27 APPENDIX D—NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT...................................................28 APPENDIX E - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................28 APPENDIX F—PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT...........................................28 • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 2 of 29 Sec. 3 8.20.010. Intent. ......................................................................................................28 SECTION I -MAP SERIES C R-1 x RS s� Subject Property AS A Vicinity Map showing adjacent zoning Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses North: Single detached homes: zoned RS, Residential Suburban South: Open Space and future commercial: zoned RS, Residential Suburban East: Single detached homes: zoned RS, Residential Suburban West: Unannexed, agriculture: zoned RS, Residential Suburban 0 0 Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 3 of 29 f' Vicinity Map from Growth Policy Figure 3-1 Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 4 of 29 111 IT JU1111.111 r. 711- t-k Tl I I 1.2 ~" r �i7 i t C��� Lj J i • - Parks and Open Space Vicinity Map • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 5 of 29 SECTION 2 REQUESTED RELAXATIONS The following relaxations have been requested. The majority are related to the street and sewer improvements. A detailed description of each requested relaxation is attached. This is an extract from the Plat Supplements section of the subdivision application. 1) Section 38.27.060.A Allow Park Frontage to have less than 100%direct street frontage. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 8. 2) Section 38.24.090.D.3 Access—Separation between the intersections of S. 3`d Ave and Ellis View Loop to be approximately 2 feet closer together than normal. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 6. 3) Section 38.24.050.A.I Street right of way width and construction standards—To provide a narrower right-of-way width for Ellis View Loop of 53 feet. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 6. 4) Section 38.24.060.A Street Improvement Standards—to have a smaller curve radii on a smaller street. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 6. 5) Design standard for required all weather access to sewer manhole—provide manholes which do not have an all weather access road. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 12. 6) Section 38.23.070.A.3 Municipal water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer systems—To not install the master planned trunk sewer along S. 3rd Avenue. Sewer access is proposed along . an existing sewer easement to the southeast. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 12. 7) Section 38.24.010.A Streets—To not construct the S. 3`d Avenue road cross section to the standards normally required for a collector street. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criteria 5 and 6. 8) Section 38.24.080.A Sidewalks—To construct a gravel fines trail along Good Medicine Way in lieu of a standard concrete sidewalk. This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 6. SECTION 3-RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. These conditions are specific to the planned unit development. Additional conditions may apply to the subdivision of the property being processed concurrently with this planned unit development. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. The proffered park improvements shall be constructed as described in Plat Supplement section Q and the proposed park master plan Appendix I of the application; and in accordance with the City of Bozeman's park development standards unless a relaxation is approved. 2. The area of park as depicted on the subdivision plat shall not be reduced in size. Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 6 of 29 3. A section shall be included within the covenants to be recorded with the property which • clearly identifies those provisions to which the City is a party and noting that those sections may not be revised without the City's consent. 4. No changes to the terms of the covenants which address municipal code requirements or conditions may be made without written approval of the City. 5. No property may be removed from the property owner's association without written approval of the City. 6. The covenants shall be revised to specifically state whether or not Accessory Dwelling Units are permitted within the development. 7. A front yard minimum setback of 20 feet to the main fagade of the house and 25 feet to the vehicle entrance to the garage or other parking area shall be provided. 8. A side yard minimum setback of 8 feet shall be provided. 9. A rear yard minimum setback of 20 feet shall be provided. 10. The yard facing Good Medicine Way is a rear yard for the purpose of determining yard setbacks. 11. Fence heights within the development may not exceed four feet. 12. Lot coverage for each lot in the Ellis View Estates shall not exceed 25%of the total area of the lot. 13. A public access easement shall be provided for those portions of the Good Medicine Way • trail which lie outside of the existing public right of way. 14. A one foot wide no access strip shall be placed along the western border of Lots 6 and 9 prohibiting vehicle access to South 3`d and along the eastern border of Lots 1-4 prohibiting vehicle access to Good Medicine Way. 15. The bicycle lane on the east side of South 3`d Avenue shall be extended from its current end point at the intersection with Wagonwheel Road to the southern property line of the development. Any tapers or transitions shall occur within the public right of way past the southern property line. A connection of similar width of trail from the end of the bicycle lane to the existing adjacent trail on the south side of the property in the designated open space of Sundance Springs shall be provided. 16. Temporary irrigation or other support necessary to fully reestablish the vegetation in the open space area disrupted by construction shall be provided for at least two years. If private improvements or vegetation within an easement are disrupted they shall be returned to essentially preconstruction condition. 17. A trail totem conforming to the City of Bozeman standard shall be provided at the beginning point of the trail within the public park identifying the trail as public access. 18. The park master plan has several incorrect references which shall be corrected prior to any final action to approve the PUD. 19. The remaining water rights, or cash in lieu thereof due for the property shall be paid with the filing of the final plat in accordance with Section 38.23.180, BMC. 0 0 Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 7 of 29 20. Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. All plans and specification shall comply with the current version (including all addenda) of the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications To Montana Public Works Standard Specifications Sixth Edition that have been adopted at the time of approval of the plans and specifications. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements. 21. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. 22. Ditch relocation or modification: a. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks shall be contacted by the Applicant regarding the proposed relocation and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) • shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. b. The Applicant shall comply with all parts of section 38.23.060.D for any ditch relocation or modification. 23. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 24. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure with the plans and specifications infrastructure drawings submitted for engineering review. 25. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 26. All proposed private utilities to serve the subdivision shall be shown on the public infrastructure plans and specifications. 27. Prior to acceptance of publically owned infrastructure, the contractor shall provide a Maintenance Bond with the developer/owner equal to 20%of the actual cost of the improvements to correct any deficiencies in workmanship and/or materials which are found during the two year warranty period. The City of Bozeman shall be named as dual oblige on the bond. 28. The applicant shall submit with the application for final plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval and noted code provisions have been satisfactorily addressed, and shall include a digital copy (pdf) of the entire final plan submittal. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to • the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 8 of 29 29. The east half of South 3rd Avenue shall be constructed to a collector standard as shown in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan alone the entire frontage of the subdivision. This shall include tapers meeting AASHTO standards to transition back to the existing roadway width on the north and south. 30. The master planned 12"trunk sewer main shall be installed along the entire frontage of the subdivision as shown on the Wastewater Facility Plan. 31. An all weather access road shall be provided to all manholes that are located outside a street or parking area. 32. If an all weather surface is required to be provided to access sewer manholes an alternative support material for the outer sections shall be provided so that the all weather surface within the Ellis View Estates and Sundance Springs open spaces or any private lot appears as no more than a 6 foot wide gravel fines pedestrian trail. SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAN CORRECTIONS A. Private utility easements shall be provided per Section 38.23.060.13 and depicted on the final PUD plan and final plat. B. The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted. Proposed main extensions shall be noted as future work. • SECTION S-RECOMMENDA TION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Project Name: Ellis View Estates planned unit development preliminary plan File: Z-13131 The DRB considered the application on June 26, 2013 and recommended conditional approval of the application. The Development Review Committee (DRC) held multiple meetings to consider the application and after finding the application had adequate material to proceed recommended approval of the application. The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the related subdivision on October 15, 2013 and made a recommendation to the City Commission. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board subdivision review committee considered the application and recommends conditional approval. The City Commission will consider the proposal on November 4, 2013. The City Commission public hearing will occur at 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman MT, in the City Commission room at 6 pm. • 0 Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 9 of 29 IS SECTION 6-STAFF ANAL YSIS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, and plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis below is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Plan Review Criteria,Section 38.19.100,BMC. The site is not within an overlay district and does not have any applicable special use review criteria unique to the project. All planned unit developments are subject to the conditional use review criteria and the planned unit development review criteria in addition to the regular site plan criteria. Review of the related subdivision will occur under application P-1 3019. Staff has not identified various code provisions that are currently unmet by this application that are not included with the requested PUD relaxations. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this prcject, prior to receiving final plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: • 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy This development proposal for residential infill development is in conformance with the Bozeman Community Plan. Figure 3-1 of the growth policy designates the property as Suburban Residential indicating that there is a semi-rural configuration in the surrounding property. The land use designation is described on page 3-1 l of the growth policy and in Appendix B of this report. The property has been annexed prior to development as recommended. The property is zoned Residential Suburban which is an implementing district for the Suburban Residential land use designation as shown in growth policy appendix C. The property has the correct designation on the future land use map and no inconsistencies with goals, objectives, or policies have been identified at this time. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations The final plan for the PUD shall comply with the standards identified in the BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. There are no known violations of municipal ordinance currently occurring on the site. The Residential Suburban district does not have a required minimum density but the lot sizes are determined through the PUD review process. Setbacks are discussed below in site plan criterion 10. The subdivision review is also subject to Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. The applicant has requested eight relaxations from various standards applicable to the project. The relaxations are listed in Section 2 of this report. The relaxations are addressed individually under the appropriate review criteria below. If the relaxations are approved 0 Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 10 of 29 through the PUD process then the project will conform to the chapter. Compliance with the chapter also includes the criteria for conditional use permits and planned unit development. Compliance with conditions of approval is a requirement of the chapter. The compliance will be demonstrated through a combination of the final plat, final PUD plan, and plans and specifications for infrastructure. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws,ordinances, and regulations No known existing non-conforming circumstances with non-municipal code provisions have been identified. The final plan will be reviewed to ensure compliance with this section. The applicant will require appropriate permits to cross the ditch with a sewer line. The plans and specifications for municipal infrastructure will be reviewed by the City's Engineering division and Park Department prior to any work commencing. Such permits and reviews will j be required to be in hand prior to beginning any work. The plans for future homes will be evaluated against the requirements of the International Building Code at the time application is made for a building permit. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property The proposed design provides for buffers to adjacent uses, open spaces are placed adjacent to existing open spaces on neighboring properties. The proposed landscaping for the open space and park is appropriate in scale and character. The trail network connects to and continues the existing trail segments and provides new safe pedestrian routes outside of the driving area of Good Medicine Way. The adjacent properties are also zoned as RS both in the City and under Gallatin County's zoning jurisdiction. The ditch which passes through the southeast corner of the property is unimpeded by the proposed development. The Design Review Board has recommended condition 10 to limit fence heights to not more than four feet. This restriction is to provide a transition between the open character of the Sundance Springs development to the south and the heavily hedged areas to the north and east. The fence height limit will also prevent the development from being a fenced off enclave isolated from adjacent properties. Integration with adjacent development is a requirement of the PUD criteria. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions The proposed Ellis View Loop will provide all vehicle access to the proposed lots. Condition 13 requires a no access strip to restrict vehicle access to the street. The development is anticipated to generate approximately 87 new vehicle trips per day. South 3`d Avenue is a collector street and provides the connection from Ellis View Loop to the rest of the community. The present capacity of S. 3rd Avenue is adequate to carry the additional traffic. See application appendix D. No material impact is expected on parking. Ellis View Loop will provide on street parking opportunities. The City's land use regulations require provision of off-street parking with more parking provided for larger numbers of bedrooms. Street frontage along the park and open space adjacent to Ellis View Loop will provide enough on-street parking for 20 vehicles. The park frontage provides required parking area for park users. The character of the park is informal and trail oriented. The provided street frontage should provide adequate parking for all park users. Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 11 of 29 A relaxation has been requested (number 7)to not build the standard City cross section for the eastern side of S. 3 Avenue but to retain a more rural character with borrow ditch and no curbing;this also means that no on-street parking will be provided along S. 3rd Avenue. All of the proposed lots will have on-street parking even with no parking provided along S. 3rd Avenue. This criterion addresses PUD requested relaxations 7 and 8. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress A no vehicle access strip is proposed to be placed along Good Medicine Way. Condition 13 memorializes this by establishing a no access strip. A bicycle lane extension along the east side of S. P Avenue is required by Condition 14. This provides for the required non- motorized access along the S. 3`d Ave. frontage of the project. This is also related to the requested relaxation number seven to not construct the standard full width of collector street for S. P Avenue. If the Commission is to grant the relaxation there should be an off-setting public benefit. The extension of the bicycle lane from its current end at the intersection of Wagonwheel Rd to the south end of the development and the connection to the trail network will provide a safety improvement and functional transportation improvement in the same corridor as the requested relaxation. Without the relaxation the development will be required to build their frontage as a standard collector cross section which will not match any section north or south and will leave an isolated section of bike lane with no connection to the north. A waiver of right to protest creation of special improvement districts for improvement to S. P Ave. was recorded as part of the annexation agreement for the property. There are two trail extensions included with the application. One is a continuation along . Good Medicine Way including provision of required easements per Condition 12. The trail along Good Medicine Way is in lieu of a standard concrete sidewalk as required by the municipal code. This is relaxation number 8. The continuation of the trail rather than placement of a concrete sidewalk is in keeping with the existing character of the pedestrian network in the area. Placement of the trail will provide a better connection as there is presently no dedicated pedestrian facility along Good Medicine Way. The other trail connects Ellis View Loop through the public park area to the existing trail system in the adjacent Sundance Springs open space. Sidewalks will be provided on both sides of the Ellis View Loop. Adequate pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress are provided. The applicant has requested relaxation to design standards for Ellis View Loop including a narrower right of way width, a smaller separation distance between intersections of Ellis View Loop and S 3`d Avenue, and design radii (relaxations 2-4). The constructed cross section of Ellis View Loop will comply with the transportation standards for a small residential street with 31 feet width of asphalt. The relaxation is to narrow the right of way width proportionate to the reduced asphalt width and to have a tighter curve radius. The narrowness of the street at 31 feet acts to reduce speed which allows for a smaller radius. The Fire Department and Sanitation have not objected to the relaxations. The applicant has requested that the street be publicly maintained. The constructed cross section is consistent with the features of the city's standards. The separation requirement for access points to collector streets is recommended at 330 feet from right of way to right of way in 38.24.0980, BMC. There are no conflicting intersections on the west side of S. 3`d Avenue. The requested relaxation is approximately 23 feet or 7%. The purpose of the separation requirement is to help preserve the functionality of collector Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 12 of 29 and arterial streets to carry traffic with reduced conflict points to improve public safety. The same number of access points would be provided if the park land were reduced in size so the access point were moved to the south. Such movement would reduce separation between the new Ellis View intersection and the existing Little Horse Drive intersection. There appears to be no material detriment from the relaxation. The Development Review Committee reviewed and recommends approval of the relaxations for Ellis View Loop. This criterion addresses PUD requested relaxations 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8. 7. Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings, the appearance of vehicular use, open space,and pedestrian areas,and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation The proposed landscaping palette and design appears to conform to the requirements of Article 38.26, Landscaping. A total of 15 performance points is required for the private open spaces and 15 are shown as having been provided. See the landscaping plan contained within Appendix I of the application for details. The applicants are proposing to use native species where appropriate.No conditions are needed to address this review criterion. 8. Open space The UDC requires certain superior performance from PUDs above and beyond that required for regular site plans. One option is to provide extra on-site open space, (separate from the dedicated parkland requirement). This is established under the PUD performance criteria below but interrelates with this criterion. The applicant has requested a relaxation to not provide 100% frontage around the entire • dedicated park perimeter(relaxation 1). Per Section 38.27.060 the City may consider less than 100%frontage under certain conditions. The proposed park is being placed adjacent to existing publicly accessible open space which has pedestrian access provided by an existing trail and which connects to open space which is bounded by a street;therefore a street is not required to be located on the southern boundary. The eastern side of the park has a proposed trail extension to connect to a nearby existing trail. Additional property is provided with the park dedication. A minimum area of 11,761 square feet of park is required. An area of 18,184 is provided. The street frontage which is not being installed on the east edge of the park space would have provided parking for four vehicles which would require approximately 1,450 square feet of paving for access and parking stalls. The development has provided an additional 4,973 square feet of park area over and above the minimum required. Therefore, additional park area has been provided and direct pedestrian access is provided. The additional 4,993 square feet meets the intent of providing constructed improvements and the request for the relaxation is therefore consistent with the intent of Section 38.27.060 and staff supports the grant of the relaxation. The trail connections provide good linkage of open space to existing facilities. To identify public access and facilitate the use of the trails a totem marker is being required by Condition 15. The applicant has proffered certain park improvements as identified in Plat Supplement Q and the park master plan Appendix I. The City is relying upon these representations and proffer to meet requirements of the review criteria for site plan compliance and PUD qualitative excellence. Therefore Conditions I and 2 require that these items be provided and not changed without City authorization. This criterion addresses PUD relaxation 1. 0 • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 13 of 29 • The applicant will be required to provide the landscaping of the park and common open spaces prior to the recording of the final plat for the development. If any work remains to be done it must be financially guaranteed. The frontage improvements for sidewalks and street trees must meet the minimum landscaping requirements of Article 38.27. 9. Building location and height The proposed PUD does not include specific building designs.No relaxation is requested from the base height regulations of 38.08.060, BMC. See setback discussion below. 10. Setbacks Section 38.08.050.13 establishes the setbacks for the RS, Residential Suburban district. As noted in that section, the setbacks for all newly created lots in the RS district are established through the PUD process. The preliminary PUD proposes setbacks of: front yard 20 feet, side yard 5 feet and rear yard 20 feet. These are slightly larger than the setbacks normally found in the R-1 district which would allow a 15 foot front yard setback along Ellis View Loop. The proposed setbacks are considerably smaller than those established for previously existing lots in the RS district of 35 foot front and 25 foot for side and rear yards. The RS zoning district is typically placed in areas with environmental constraints. Therefore, larger lot size and yards are appropriate to provide for adequate building areas which avoid the constrained areas. In the circumstances of this application the environmental features, the ditch and slope area, are protected by being placed within common open spaces and not within individual lots. There are no other environmental restrictions on the property. • The adjacent properties are developed on a range of lot sizes with the more recent lots in Sundance Springs being smaller with a larger percentage of common open spaces rather than lower density individual lots. A balance can be found in this development between the City's goals to encourage density of development on municipal services and the need to respect the character of the existing adjacent development. An open space or park area has been provided on the perimeter of the development. This provides some separation from adjacent lower density areas and the open areas.are proposed to be landscaped. The overall proposed density is slightly higher than adjacent Sundance Springs but is consistent with the RS expectations. A balance between the local circumstances, previous development, and the various aspirations and standards of the City may be achieved with minor adjustments to the proposed setbacks. An additional setback for the garage vehicle entry will encourage a greater quality of street character by emphasizing the main home fagade. A garage setback of 25 feet is achievable and provides a 5 foot incentive to bring the main fagade of the home forward giving it more visual prominence. A slightly wider side yard setback of 8 feet will provide some assurance of a more open character which is consistent with the large amounts of open space and larger setbacks for the adjacent existing homes; while not unduly restricting the design flexibility of the proposed lots which vary between 10,152 and 16,883 square feet. With combined total of 16 feet of side yard setback the narrowest proposed lot, Lot 4 which is wedge shaped, would still have an accessible frontage of forty feet. The setbacks are established by condition so they are specifically identified in an action to approve the project. • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 14 of 29 An existing overflow ditch is depicted in the southeast corner of the project site. As a ditch, • there is no defined setback requirement as there is for a natural water course. Ditch maintenance easements are required to be provided by Section 38.23.060.D, BMC. 11. Lighting New street lighting is proposed to conform to municipal standards. Lighting is only required at the intersections of S. 3`d Avenue and Ellis View Loop. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities A)Private utilities will be provided within established easements or through new easements to be established with the final plat. Section 38.23.060 sets minimum standards which will be verified during final plat review. B)Public utilities provided to the site include transportation. Access to the street system is given by S. 3rd Avenue and the proposed Ellis View Loop. Access for transportation appears adequate. Criterion 5, impact on traffic and parking, Criteria 6, Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress address transportation. C) Water services will be provided by a new water main to be placed under Ellis View Loop and connected to the existing water main underneath S. 3`d Avenue. Adequate capacity exists in the City's water system to accommodate this additional development. The applicant must provide cash-in-lieu of water rights in accordance with Section 38.23.180 at the time of final plat. D) Sanitary sewer capacity exists at the City's water reclamation facility. Piping connecting • the new lots to existing piping must be installed. Sewer pipe location options are very sensitive to the depth of pipe and the grade between existing and proposed development. The preference is to use gravity flow sewers as they are more dependable and less costly for both the public and private parties. There are several options which will use gravity flow. The sewer main routing initially proposed with the application will go from the south leg of Ellis View Loop, through the new park and open space in a new dedicated utility easement, and connect to an existing public utility easement which terminates at Peace Pipe Drive. The existing public utility easement was provided with the Sundance Springs PUD and passes through open space which is covered with native vegetation. The easement passes between two homes on Lots 24 and 25. The proposed sewer distance is approximately 700 feet and includes four manholes which are not under a roadway. The route requires four manholes to address changes in direction of the pipe. A map of the easement alignment from the Sundance Springs final plat is provided below with the route marked in red. Z-13131,Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 15 of 29 Lj L X 2 I l i N 28a07, ,,16 W k 03 ION 250.15' (R&M) 2�9 ' LOT 27 OF BOZEMAN �� 14.3%)p,`. 0.33«r¢¢ 30' S ITARY SEWER LOT 26 0%0- 1 0,300¢y1t. O ASEMENT 42:6 031 au¢¢ 3.07 R&M Nss3s�,s= r� 30 \Q� 371.58' 15' LOT 25 Q / ,�►E \ 15,828 14541754"E � J , • , „ 106.12' LOT 24 Q� /, LOT ¢ N 6 45 51 E ,6.2237 \ ` '0.33 60.00' (R&M) s L530.S3a 0<2«,¢, �y � � LOT 15 15s77 q.N. 44�� / acr¢¢ h EN SPACE — —+� ' �zza•,$ 0.36 s5 m ---2e7:bs �• t��1� o'ti: / N86'05E / LOT 14 tl1,1.30' �� is 16,035.q.fa 0.37 acres a 13090— — n LOT 13 $.1%,7. ��< The City requires an all weather access to the sewer manholes as part of its design standards. The sewer maintenance trucks are quite heavy, in excess of 30 tons, and need good support, beyond what soil alone will provide, to prevent them from becoming stuck. Each manhole is visited typically annually, more often if needed to ensure that the pipe stays clear and can function as needed. Typically the access way must be at least 12 feet wide. The applicant has requested relaxation 5 to not provide an all weather access to sewer manholes. The DRC does not support this relaxation. The requirement for access is normally met by an overlying public street. However, that alternative is not available for the initial alignment proposed with this project. An all weather access road is usually constructed of compacted rock and binders. This would be very visually disruptive to the character of the existing and proposed open space. Other alternatives to a gravel road do exist to provide the structural support required for the maintenance trucks which would lessen the visual disruption of the access road. Condition 18 requires use of an alternative support material. The material is not specified so the best option can be determined during the infrastructure design phase. The option is provided in Condition 18 to completely vegetate the access road if the applicant so desires or the Commission so directs. There is a section of the sewer easement which passes through the new parkland and so the access would double as a trail section which will connect to the existing Sundance Springs trail system. As the sewer line leaves the park the entire access way could be vegetated. Establishment of replacement vegetation will require supportive irrigation.A period of at least two years of function has been included on the basis of past experience by the City in • establishing natural landscapes. Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 16 of 29 Several alternative alignments have been considered and continue to be evaluated as of the writing of this report. l) Install the master planned sewer line under S. 3Td Avenue. The current endpoint of the sewer stops at Cambridge Drive. It is approximately 2,300 feet from Cambridge Drive to the northern intersection of S. 3`d Ave. and Ellis View Loop. The line would cross annexed and unannexed developed areas. Only nine homes will be constructed with this development. To have such a long pipe run with such a light flow may contribute to maintenance issues as there may not be continuous momentum in the flow to keep the pipe clear. Eventually when the property to the west develops additional flow will resolve that issue but there is no schedule or ability to predict for when that might happen. 2) The applicant could construct a more direct connection from the proposed main location in the project open space through the adjacent Sundance Springs open space to intersect with the existing sewer at the intersection of Peace Pipe and White Eagle Drive. There is no existing easement for this route. An easement would need to be obtained from the Sundance Springs Homeowners Association who owns the property. The route would be a straight line and would not require manholes outside of a street and therefore would not require an access road. This would be about half the distance of pipe and therefore less expensive for the applicant to install and the City to maintain. The route would cross the ditch and be very shallow at that point. It would be necessary to obtain permission from the ditch owner to install a culvert and add additional cover to protect the sewer line. The DRC has no objection to this route but it will require cooperation from at least two private parties to obtain the legal ability to install it. The alternate route is shown in red. 0 Z-13131,Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 17 of 29 e Y Yh7�!i T.11N51�1 N> LOT 6 LOT 7 •.� t.w.,,s rt suet s4 n a '4A LOT 5, �, � • .V-� ,M—per,- l , ,1•H sa/`� �.� .,. a _ — i SLY AW WA�rt SUMN J n�. nc:[rr�,LDCAro. PARK WJArA JA M - � f J t,...• � ! , � f � i.tiY1+0.Fnr•.r ,,t` �6.rli kN '?9 - 0��\ This criterion addresses PUD requested relaxations 5 and 6. 13. Site surface drainage The design of the pond in open space 2 and associated landscaping appears to conform to applicable standards. Specific design details will be finalized with the storm water engineering review. Maintenance of the surface drainage facilities is the responsibility of the home owners association. The detention pond is designed so in the event of excess flow the additional water will be directed to the borrow ditch along South 3`d Avenue. The final design of the detention pond will be evaluated during the plan and specification review for infrastructure. 14. Loading and unloading areas No formal loading and unloading areas are required with the proposed residential project. 15. Grading The site is relatively flat with a slight slope mostly to the southeast. The SE corner drops more quickly to the SE where the ditch is located. Relatively minor grading of the site is anticipated with this application in order to accommodate new storm water drainage provisions. Grading will be addressed in detail with the grading plans required for the storm water and street design. 0 Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 18 of 29 16. Signage • No signage is requested as part of this application. Any future subdivision identification sign will require a sign permit. No certificate of appropriateness is required. 17. Screening The only required screening for this project is the standard code requirements for screening of mechanical equipment. No mechanical equipment or location is identified at this time. As individual building permits are submitted for homes the issue will be evaluated. 18. Overlay district provisions Not applicable 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties As of the writing of this report, eight public comments had been received. Primary concerns from the public comment relate to: 1)the route of the required sewer line (eight comments); 2)the aesthetic and practical consequences of its construction on the open space and adjacent private property owners (eight comments); 3) control of access to Good Medicine Way(one comment); 4)architectural and landscape compatibility(one comment); 5) development timeline (one comment). The proposed conditions or alternatives identified in this report will address the public comments. The public comments are attached to this report. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming or The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Not applicable. 21. Compliance with article 8 of chapter 10 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Not applicable. 22. Phasing of development No phasing is proposed. Applicable Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria,Section 38.19.100,BMC E. In addition to the review criteria of section 38.19.100, the review authority shall, in approving a conditional use permit, determine favorably as follows: Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 19 of 29 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences, parking, loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity; The proposed open spaces, landscape plan, park, and fence restrictions proposed in the covenants along with the larger setbacks proposed as conditions of approval address these issues. Project uses are open space/park which is adjacent to existing open space; and residences. The lots are of a size adequate to allow reasonable construction. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof; No material adverse effects have been identified. The development of the site will generate additional traffic and demand for utilities but the additional service demands are within capability to provide service. The conditions as proposed mitigate issues of impact on abutting property. On-site open space and park land has been provided to meet demand by new residents and to provide buffers to adjacent properties. Conditions have been proposed to establish setbacks and lot coverage appropriate to the development. With these conditions the residential use is acceptable on the site. Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 20 of 29 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to: Only those needing to be addressed beyond the site plan criteria are noted. a. Regulation of use; No special regulations of use are required. The covenants should be explicit about whether accessory dwelling units are intended or not intended to be allowed within the development. b. Special yards,spaces and buffers; c. Special fences,solid fences and walls; The Design Review Board has recommended a restriction on fence heights of four feet as discussed under the site plan review criteria above. d. Surfacing of parking areas; e. Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g. Regulation of signs; h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors; j. Regulation of hours for certain activities; k. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1. Duration of use; in. Requiring the dedication of access rights; and n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner. As proposed the design does not appear to require extraordinary conditions except as have been identified under the site plan criteria. To avoid repetition please see those sections. Z-13131,Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 21 of 29 • F. In addition to all other conditions,the following general requirements apply to every conditional use permit granted: 1. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure; and 2. That all of the conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns,shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the county clerk and recorder's office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. The necessary recording of documents will be addressed as part of the final site plan process; and will be required to be recorded prior to the approval of the final site plan for the planned unit development. Applicable Planned Unit Development Review Criteria,Section 38.20.090.E,BMC 2. In addition to the criteria for all site plan and conditional use reviews, the following criteria will be used in evaluating all planned unit development applications. a. All development. All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against, and comply with, the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory • all development" group. (1)Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply,irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas,telephone,storm drainage, cable television, and streets? All required private utilities are provided for with utility easements. The easements will be created through the recording of the final plat with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. A non-standard street section is proposed as allowed by Article 38.24. The proposed cross section includes services for pedestrians. Extension of public utilities is proposed for water and sewer. Storm drainage will be addressed privately per the City's standards. The design standards will be applied by the Engineering Division and Parks Division before any work begins. Detailed review will occur through the subdivision review process. Proposed trails appear to be in logical locations and continue the existing character. An access easement is needed for portions of the Good Medicine Way trail. No flood hazard areas have been identified. (2)Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? No significant woody vegetation exists on the site which is covered in grasses. The proposed landscaping plan identifies revegetation procedures for disturbed areas which will remain as open space. A condition has been suggested by staff for the reestablishment of vegetation in areas which are disturbed for construction of the sewer main. There is a considerable amount of weeds on the property. A weed management plan is provided with the associated subdivision. • Z-13131,Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 22 of 29 (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation,open space and • landscaping,etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes,the design layout and private design covenants provides a cohesive set of standards. (4)Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation,and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The proposed extensions of the trail system will facilitate travel by walking and bicycling which reduces overall energy use. Location as an infill development reduces total travel distances. The building code will apply energy efficiency standards at the time of building construction. The extension of the bike lane along S. 3`d will advance the development of the City's non-motorized travel network. (5)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings,circulation, open space and landscaping,etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Yes, the open space placement helps provide for privacy by buffering the development from adjacent uses. (6) Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by • section 38.27.020. The required parkland is provided. See discussion above under site plan criteria eight. (7) Performance.All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. The project meets the required performance standard by providing option (b)Additional open space. An area of 31,882 square feet is required to provide enough private open space to meet this performance standard. An area of 38,362 of private open space has been provided. More than the minimum area of public parkland has also been provided. Collectively the park and open space is 31%of the net project area. (8) Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The pedestrian system and open spaces integrate into adjacent development. Significant public comment was received during the annexation of this project from adjacent residents asking that the new development not connect to Good Medicine Way. The proposed design respects that public comment. The use of the site is for residential uses and open space which is consistent in character of use with adjoining development. b. Residential. Planned unit developments in residential areas (R-S, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, RMH and R-O zoning districts) may include a variety of housing types designed to enhance the natural environmental, conserve energy, recognize, and to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods, with provisions for a mix of • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 23 of 29 limited commercial development. For purposes of this section, "limited commercial development" means uses listed in the 13-1 neighborhood service district(article 10 of this chapter), within the parameters set forth below. All uses within the PUD must be sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood. The permitted number of residential dwelling units shall be determined by the provision of and proximity to public services and subject to the following limitations: (1) On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project (calculated for residential portion of the site only)consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? Yes, the Suburban Residential land use designation describes a preexisting pattern of lots being two acres or less. The proposed development has lots of less than two acres in size. Generally, the growth policy encourages infill development at densities respectful to but which may be higher than what may be currently in place. The lot sizes are considerably above the minimums required for other single detached homes in other zoning districts in the City. (2)Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g.,,private yards, patios and balconies, etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light,sun,ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Private yards are provided. Open spaces are also provided which allow for separation from • adjacent properties. The size of the open spaces conforms to City standards. (3)Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Public park is provided and connections to the extensive existing trail system in the area. The nature of the park is more naturalized in keeping with the character of the adjacent open spaces. The trail networks provide opportunity for a variety of active uses and link to more developed recreational areas through the community trail network. (4)If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below,does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? No density bonus is requested. (5)Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment,conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? Yes,the density of the project provides for less energy use and more efficient public services by shortening travel distances and length of required utility extensions. The existing ditch on the site is protected and enhanced with landscaping. Providing a higher density development places less demand on municipal services both with initial installation and long term maintenance. Several alternatives for sewer main routing are discussed above. (6) Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus (30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district within which the project is located and which is set forth in article 8 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards (such as for • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 24 of 29 setbacks,off-street parking,open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development? The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus shall be determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation shall be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to chapter 10,article 8, shall be excluded in the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated. No bonus is requested. (7)Limited commercial. If limited commercial development, as defined above, is proposed within the project, is less than 20 percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? No limited commercial is proposed. (8)Does the overall PUD recognize and,to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? Yes, the PUD is a lower density development on larger lots which is the existing character. The pattern is similar to the adjacent Sundance Springs development which is also within the jCity limits and zoned as Residential Suburban. The adjacent development to the north and east is not annexed and must be on substantially larger lots to provide onsite water and sewer treatment. It is expected that these county parcels will annex and redevelop to a higher density over time but will be unlikely to meet the typical city densities due to slopes, • watercourses, and similar site constraints. APPENDIX A AD VISOR Y CODE CITA TIONS The following code provisions are identified for informational purposes as the project moves forward. These will need to be addressed as part of the final site plan application or other process step. a. Section 38.20.060 requires the applicant to submit a final plan within 12 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. The director will set the required number of copies. This is the final step in the site zoning entitlement process. An application form and fee is required in addition to the final plan set submittal. b. Section 38.28.060.A.3 requires a sign permit to be obtained prior to establishing a subdivision identification sign or other permanent sign. c. Section 38.20.060 states that the project must be completed within two years of final approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year, the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Community Development Director. For your information, Code requirement. d. Section 38.39.030 requires that the applicant shall provide for private improvements certification by the architect, landscape architect, engineer and other applicable professionals that all improvements including, but not limited to landscaping, ADA accessibility requirements, private infrastructure, or other requirement elements were installed in • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 25 of 29 accordance with the approved site plan, plans and specifications. For your information. This will be required prior to occupancy following construction. e. All construction activities shall comply with section 38.39.020.A.2 of the Unified Development Code. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. f. Section 38.39.030 requires that all infrastructure improvements including 1)water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the final plat for the subdivision. g. Storm water Master Plan: Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm water Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the storm water receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical storm water detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a storm water maintenance plan. h. Per Chapter 40, BMC a Storm Water Management Permit(SMP) must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Site Plan Approval. The SMP requires submittals of an application form and a Storm Water Management Plan in compliance with the City of Bozeman's Storm Water Management Ordinance#1763. The SMP is independent of any other storm water permitting required from the State of Montana, and does not fulfill the requirement to obtain a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) if they are required for this development. A copy of the Notice of Intent(NOI), the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and the approval letter from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality shall be submitted to the City. Any storm water ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Storm water ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned • lots. • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 26 of 29 While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot. i. The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 38.39.020.A.1 of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. APPENDIX B—PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned "R-S" (Residential Suburban District). The intent of the R-S District is "to allow open space, resource protection and primarily single-household development in circumstances where environmental constraints limit the desirable density. All new subdivision and site plan developments in this district shall be subject to the provisions of article 20 of this chapter, pertaining to planned unit development, and shall be developed in compliance with the adopted city growth policy." Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as"Suburban Residential" in the Bozeman Community Plan. The • Plan indicates that"This category indicates locations generally outside of City limits, but within the planning area, where a land development pattern has already been set by rural subdivisions. Subdivisions in this area are generally characterized by lots two acres in size or less. It is probable that portions of this area may be proposed for annexation within the next twenty years. The area is able to be served with municipal water and sewer services with appropriate extensions of main lines. Any further development within this area should be clustered to preserve functional open space. Individual septic and well services are discouraged. If development is proposed within reasonable access distances to waste water and water services, annexation to the City should be completed prior to development." • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 27 of 29 • APPENDIX C—DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTIONAND BACKGROUND Project Description The site is located at 3601 Good Medicine Way. The site is 5.01 acres in size. The proposal is to subdivide an existing parcel in the R-S (Residential Suburban) District to create nine (9) single-household residential lots, two open space lots, and parkland parcel. Accessory dwelling units are not being addressed in the covenants. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) review is required in R-S Districts. No variances are being requested with the application. However, the Applicant has requested eight relaxations in the PUD application. A subdivision to create the nine lots is being processed concurrently with the PUD. Project Background The parent tract was created through Amended Plat of Minor Subdivision No. 35 filed with the Gallatin County Clerk& Recorder in November of 1980. A note on plat stated Lot 4, the subject property, "is to be used as a church site and accessory uses of a church." This restriction was later removed. The property was annexed by the City in October, 2012 through Resolution 4415. The Applicant requested an initial zoning designation of R-1 (Residential Single Household Low Density) and was approved for R-S. After annexation the property went through a Pre-Application subdivision and PUD concept • review. The proposed preliminary plat and plan is substantially similar to the pre-application proposal including nine residential lots, two open space lots and a park. I I • • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 28 of 29 APPENDIX D—NOTICING Noticing was provided by posting the site, publication of a legal advertisement in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, and by mailing a notice to all landowners within 200 feet of the perimeter of the planned unit development. Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the City Commission public hearing on November 4, 2013. APPENDIX E- OWNER INFORMATIONAND REVIEWING STAFF Owner/Applicant: Mahar Montana Home, 1627 W. Main Street, #370, Bozeman MT 59718 Representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying, 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Report By: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager APPENDIX F PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 38.20.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development(PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter • to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; 5. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6. To encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; 8. To reduce energy consumption and demand; 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 10. To improve the design, quality and character of new development; • • • Z-13131, Staff Report for the Ellis View Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 29 of 29 11. To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12. To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13. To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14. To promote the efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options, and detailed and human-scale design; and 15. To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040 • V I � i Engineering and Surveying Inc. } 1091 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman, Montana • Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587-9768 www.chengineers.com • E-Mail: info@chengineers.com August 7, 2013 C V . D City of Bozeman AUG 0 R 2013 Department of Community Development 20 East Olive St. DEPAF(TMENT OF PLANNING P.O. Box 1230 AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Bozeman, MT 59771 }f6 RE: Ellis View Preliminary Plat Application Additional Information Dear Tom Rodgers, A* On behalf of the owner of the above referenced property, Mahar Montana Homes, we are ...� informing you that the 20 binders containing4he preliminary plat application have been �41 updated with a complete water and sewer report,pursuantjo Section A8 4.1�)60.10 BMC and a traffic generation report eting all applicalile' standards in SectionN 8.41.060.12 BMC. We look forward to continuing the review of this,purposed subdivision preliminary plat. Respectfully, h Mike,Balch :y Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Preliminary Plat Applications (Development Review and Preliminary Plat) 2. Introduction 3. Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions A. Adjoining Property Owners List and Certification B. Vicinity Map C. Reduced Plat Maps D. Statement of Requested Relaxation and Facts of Hardship E. Preliminary Platting Certificate 4. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements A. Surface Water B. Floodplains C. Groundwater D. Geology-Soils-Slopes E. Vegetation F. Wildlife G. Historical Features H. Agriculture . I. Agricultural Water User Facilities J. Water Supply K. Sanitary Sewer L. Storm Water Management M. Streets, Roads and Alleys N. Utilities 0. Educational Facilities P. Land Use Q. Parks and Recreation Facilities R. Lighting plan S. Miscellaneous 5. Appendices A. Water/Groundwater Information B. Soils/Geology C. Water/Sewer/Storm/Water Plan D. Traffic Impact Analysis & Study E. Response Letters F. Weed Management and Revegetation Plan G. Covenants, Restrictions, and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners Assoc. H. Lighting Plan S1. Park Plan • I APPENDIX C WATER/SEWER/STORM . WATER PLAN i i DESIGN REPORT WATER & SEWER MANAGEMENT ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION Prepared for: Mahar Montana Homes 1627 W. Main St. Ste. 370, Bozeman, MT 59718 Prepared by: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 (406)f 587-1115 :�frer Project Number: 11489 JULY 2013 • INTRODUCTION The Ellis View Estates Subdivision is a proposed nine lot subdivision located between South Third Avenue and Good Medicine Way and south of Wagon Wheel Road. The 5.01-acre development is situated in the northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., Gallatin County,Montana.This project will require connection to existing City of Bozeman water, sanitary sewer, and road system. WATER SYSTEM LAYOUT Current water main in the area utilized for the Ellis View Subdivision includes a 12-inch ductile iron pipe(DIP)located in South Third Avenue at the west subdivision boundary. An 8-inch DIP is purposed to be located under the purposed Ellis View Loop Road connecting to the 12-inch main in South Third Avenue to the north and south of the subdivision. A WaterCAD analysis is enclosed (Appendix A) analyzing all mains installed with this project. The connection to the existing system is modeled as a pump with characteristics matching data measured by the City of Bozeman Water Department. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SIZING Input Data Average Daily Residential Usage = 170 gallons per capita per day Average Population Density = 2.11 persons/dwelling unit Minimum Fire Hydrant Flow = 1,500 gpm Residual Pressure Required = 20 psi for Fire Flow Average Day Demand (Peaking Factor= 1) Maximum Day Demand (Peaking Factor= 2.3) Maximum Hour Demand (Peaking Factor= 3.0) Water Demands (9 dwelling units) • Design Report-Page 2 of 7 Average Day Demand = 9 d.u. x 2.11 persons/d.u. x 170 gpcpd= 3228.3 gpd=2.24 gpm • Maximum Day Demand -2.24 gpm x 2.3 = 5.15 gpm Peak Hour Demand -2.24 gpm x 3.0 = 6.73 gpm Available Pressure: 12-inch main in South Third Ave. (Hydrant#1075) Static=40 psi Pitot= 55 psi Residual= 39 psi HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS A water distribution model was created using WaterCAD Version 6.5 for demand forecasting and describing domestic and fire protection requirements. In order to model the system, each junction node of the water distribution system was assessed a demand based on its service area. The table shown below quantifies the demands placed at the junction nodes and calculates the demands for Average Day,Maximum Day and Peak Hour within the subdivision. The peaking factor for each case is 1, 2.3 and 3.0 respectively. • AVG. MAX. JUNCTION # OF DAY DAY PEAK NODE LOTS GPM GPM HOUR GPM 39 1 0.25 0.57 0.75 40 1 0.25 0.57 0.75 J7 1 0.25 0.57 0.75 J8 2 0.50 1.14 1.50 J9 2 0.50. 1.14 1.50 J 10 1 0.25 0.57 0.75 ill 1 0.25 0.57 0.75 Total 9 2.24 5.15 6.73 Static, residual and pitot pressures were obtained from fire hydrant #1075 located at the intersection of Littlehorse and South Third Avenue. Measurements obtained by the City of Bozeman Water Department indicate a static pressure of 40 psi, a pitot pressure of 55 psi, and a residual pressure of 39 psi at this hydrant (Appendix A). • Design Report-Page 3 of 7 i • This flow/pressure information was used to develop relationships between static head and flow at the tie in point. This relationship was used in the model by simulation of a pump at the connection point. The pump is connected to a reservoir which acts as a source of water. The elevation of the reservoir is fixed at the elevation of the pump, which is also equivalent to the elevation of the tie in point. The reservoir does not create any head on the system, the head is generated entirely by the pumps. The input data and the pump curves are included in Appendix A. DISTRIBUTION MAIN The 12-inch DIP water mains do provide capacity with regards to the Peak Hour Demands. The flows and pressures within the system for the Peak Hour Demands were generated with the WaterCAD program and can be found in Appendix A. The capacity of the system to meet fire flow requirements was tested by running a steady state fire flow analysis for all junctions at fire hydrant locations. The model shows that all hydrant junctions satisfy fire flow constraints (residual pressure > 20 psi, flow rate > 1500 gpm), while providing service to lots at peak hour. The results of the analysis at peak hourly flow are given in Appendix A. SEWER SYSTEM Sewer main lines will be installed in the streets of the subdivision and will flow into the existing 8-inch main in Peace Pipe Drive near the southeast boundary of the subdivision. Design Requirements The flow rates used herein are according to the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy (DSSP) dated March, 2004. The peaking factor for the design area is determined by figuring the equivalent population and inserting the population into the Harmon Formula. An 8-inch main is used because that is the minimum diameter allowed within the City of Design Report-Page 4 of 7 Bozeman. Using the city average of 2.11 persons per household the equivalent is calculated. Peace Pipe Connection: Equivalent Population = (2.11 persons/dwelling unit)(9 units)= 19 persons Harmon Formula: Peaking Factor= (18 +Po.S)/(4 +P0.5) where: P =Population in thousands Peaking Factor= (18 + 0.0190-5)/(4 +0.019") Peaking Factor=4.38 Assumed infiltration rate = 150 gallons/acre/day= 150 (5.01 acres) = 752 gal/day The peak flow rate is calculated by multiplying the City's design generation rate of 89 gallons per capita per day by the population,multiplying by the peaking factor,and adding the infiltration rate: Peak Flow Rate = 89 gpcpd (19 persons) (4.38) + 752 gpd = 8,159 gpd = 5.67 gpm (0.0126 cfs) The capacity of an 8-inch main is checked using Manning's Equation: Qf,ii = (1.486/0.013)AR"3S" For the 8-inch main: Manning's n = 0.013 for PVC Pipe Minimum Slope =0.004 ft/ft A=area= (3.14/4)d 2=(3.14/4)(8/12)2= 0.34907 ft2 P =perimeter=2(3.14)r=2(3.14)(4/12) =2.0944 ft R=hydraulic radius =A/P = 0.34907/2.0944 = 0.16667 ft R2i3 = 0.30105 ft S = 0.004 ft/ft S112 = 0.0632 ft/ft Design Report-Page 5 of 7 • i QfUu = (1.486/0.013)(0.34907)(0.30105)(0.0632) = 0.7592 cfs Based on these calculations the percent of full capacity is calculated for the service area. Connection: Q/Qf-,,u = 0.0126/0.7592 = 0.0166 or 1.66% Based on these calculations, an 8-inch sewer line is more than adequate to carry the design flows for the subdivision. The existing 8-inch main(P-292)on Graef Street is currently flowing at 44.6% of capacity (Appendix A) and has adequate capacity for the additional flows from the subdivision. Peak flows are expected to increase by 1.50% in the existing main on Graef Street. Design Report-Page 6 of 7 APPENDIX A WATERCAD MODEL & COB HYDRANT/SEWER DATA • Design Report-Page 7 of 7 Scenario: Peak Hour J-20 00 d J-S$16 J-19 P-17 J-39 p'46 J-40 O J-7 '0 R-1 PMP-1 P 19 -16 P-20 10 J-14 J-15 P" r9 J-8 co I1 J-9 N li. Q� J-18 -10 P-5 J-11 d P�6 • g J-f713 J-1 • Title: Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:49:58 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Calculation Results Summary • Scenario:Peak Hour [Analysis Started] * Tue Jul 16 11:27:09 2013 Fire Flow] Failed to Converge.......0 Satisfied Constraints.... 17 Failed Constraints.......0 Total Nodes Computed..... 17 [Steady State] 0:00:00 Balanced after 12 trials;relative flow change=0.000517 Flow Summary 0:00:00 Reservoir R-1 is closed [Analysis Ended] Tue Jul 16 11:27:09 2013 • • Title:Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:58:34 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 0 0 Detailed Report for Pump: PMP-1 Note: he input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Scenario Peak Hour Active Topology Alternative Base-Active Topology Physical Alternative Base-Physical Demand Alternative Base-Demand Initial Settings Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Operational Age Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Constituent Trace Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Base-Fire Flow Capital Cost Alternative Base-Capital Cost Energy Cost Alternative Base-Energy Cost User Data Alternative Base-User Data Global Adjustments Summary Demand <None> Roughness <None> Geometric Summary X 15,986.98 ft Upstream Pipe P-19 Y 12,716.42 ft Downstream Pipe P-20 • Elevation 8.50 ft Pump Definition Summary Pump Definition hydrant 1075 littlehorse and 3rd Initial Status Initial Pump Status On Initial Relative Speed Facto 1.00 Calculated Results Summary Time Control IntakeDischargeDischargePump RelativeCalculated (hr) Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Speed Water Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (ft) (Hp) 0.00 On 8.50 100.81 0.00 32.31 1.00 0.00 Title: Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 12:01:00 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Detailed Report for Pump: PMP-1 Pump Head Curve 100.OT PMP-1 (Relative Speed Factor = 1.00) II 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 V 50.0 2 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0 6000.0 7000.0 Discharge (gPm) Title:Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C 8 H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 12:01:00 PM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2 Scenario: Peak Hour i Calculation Results:PMP-1 Time Control Intake Discharge Discharge Pump Relative Calculated (hr) Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Speed Water Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (ft) (Hp) 0.00 On 8.50 100.81 0.00 92.31 1.00 0.00 Title: Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 12:01:32 PM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Peak Hour Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report MP'Labei Zone Fire Flo Fire Flow Satisfies Needed Available Total Total Residual Calculated Ainimum Zon Calculatec inimum Iterations Balanced? Fire Flow FireRm Fire Flow Flow Pressure Residual Pressure Minimum Zone onstraints (gpm) Flow Needed Available (psi) Pressure (psi) Zone Junction (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) (psi) Pressure (psi) J-38 Zone 13 true true 1,500.00 3,647.34 1,500.00 3,647.34 20.00 30.82 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-39 Zone 12 true true 1,500.00 3,600.34 1,500.00 3,600.34 20.00 24.73 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-40 Zone 14 true true 1,500.00 3,474.30 1,500.00 3,474.30 20.00 23.03 20.00 20.00 J-15 J-7 Zone 13 true true 1,500.00 3,368.77 1,500.00 3,368.77 20.00 22.47 20.00 20.00 J-15 J-8 Zone 14 true true 1,500.00 3,129.94 1,500.00 3,129.94 20.00 21.70 20.00 20.00 J-15 J-9 Zone 15 true true 1,500.00 3,223.30 1,500.00 3,223.30 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.27 J-15 J-10 Zone 14 true true 1,500.00 3,180.36 1,500.00 3,180.36 20.00 20.00 20.00 21.70 J-15 J-11 Zone 13 true true 1,500.00 3,290.16 1,500.00 3,290.16 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.80 J-18 J-12 Zone 13 true true 1,500.00 3,346.56 1,500.00 3,346.56 20.00 22.05 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-13 Zone 13 true true 1,500.00 3,647.34 1,500.00 3,647.34 20.00 23.46 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-14 Zone 12 true true 1,500.00 3,087.65 1,500.00 3,087.65 20.00 23.25 20.00 20.00 J-15 J-15 Zone 14 true true 1,500.00 3,025.70 1,500.00 3,025.70 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.12 J-18 J-16 Zone 13 true true 1,500.00 3,647.34 1,500.00 3,647.34 20.00 27.14 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-17 Zone 11 true true 1,500.00 3,314.94 1,500.00 3,314.94 20.00 23.25 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-18 Zone 12 true true 1,500.00 3,217.53 1,500.00 3,217.53 20.00 20.00 20.00 23.93 J-17 J-19 Zone 14 true true 1,500.00 3,628.11 1,500.00 3,628.11 20.00 28.49 20.00 20.00 J-18 J-20 Zonel 14 true true 1,500.00 3,628.11 1,500.00 3.628.11 20.00 24.38 20.00; 20.00 J-18 • i Title: Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:53:29 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Scenario: Peak Hour Fire Flow Analysis Fire Flow Report inimum Syster Salculated Minimum Pressure Minimum System (psi) System Junction Pressure (psi) N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A -0.00 PMP-1 N/A I -0.00 PMP-1 • • Title: Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:53:29 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2 . Scenario: Peak Hour Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) :Calculated iydraulic Grad (psi) (gpm) (ft) J-38 0.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 43.62 J-39 2.25 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 42.64 J-40 4.25 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 41.78 J-7 6.25 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 40.91 J-8 11.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 38.86 J-9 13.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 37.99 J-10 15.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 37.13 J-11 17.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 36.26 J-12 17.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 36.26 J-13 17.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 36.26 J-14 8.50 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 39.94 J-15 16.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 36.69 J-16 8.50 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 39.94 J-17 17.50 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 36.04 J-18 25.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 32.80 J-19 0.00 Zone Demand 0.00 Fixed 0.00 100.81 43.62 J-20 7.50 Zone Demand 0.00 1 Fixed 1 0.001 100.811 40.37 • • Title:Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:54:11 AM ®Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Scenario: Peak Hour is Fire Flow Analysis Pipe Report *Label Length iametee Material Hazen- Check Minor Control Dischargi Ipstrearn StructLE Emnstream Structui eressure Headloss (ft) (in) Williams Valve? Loss Status (gpm) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Pipe Gradient C oefficien (ft) (ft) Head loss(ft/1000ft) (ft) P-46 80.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-1 45.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-3 70.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-4 65.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-5 130.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-6 90.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-8 140.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-9 25.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-10 10.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-11 1.00 48.0 PVC 150.0 false 0.00 Open -0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-12 1.00 48.0 PVC 150.0 false 0.00 Open -0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-13 30.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-14 40.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-15 10.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-16 40.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-17 75.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.01 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-18 10.00 8.0 Ductile Iro 130.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 100.81 100.81 0.00 0.00 P-19 1.00 48.0 PVC 150.0 false 0.00 Open 0.00 8.50 8.50 0.00 0.00 P-20 1 1.001 48.0 PVC 150.01 false 1 0.00 1 Open 1 0.001 100.811 100.811 0.00 0.00 Title: Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:54:34 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Peak Hour Fire Flow Analysis Pump Report Label Elevation Control Intake Discharge DischargePump Calculated (ft) Status Pump Pump (gpm) Head Water Grade Grade (ft) Power (ft) (ft) (Hp) PMP-11 8.50 On 8.50 100.811 0.00 92.311 0.00 Title:Ellis View Estates Project Engineer:Greg Steckler g:\c&h\11\11489\ellis view estates watercad.wcd C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. WaterCAD v6.5[6.5120] 07/16/13 11:54:56 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Pump Curve Calculations: Pump#1 (Hydrant#1075, Littlehorse/3rd Ave.) Static Pressure (Ps) = 40 Pitot Pressure (Pp)= 55 measured at hydrant#1075 Residual Pressure (Pr) = 39 Qf= 920 Q=Qf*((Ps-P)/(Ps-Pr))(o.s4) Pressure Flow Head 40 0.00 92.31 35 2193.97 80.77 30 3189.98 69.23 25 3970.79 57.69 20 4638.14 46.15 15 5232.09 34.62 10 5773.42 23.08 5 6274.58 11.54 0 6743.73 0.00 -5 7186.59 -11.54 -10 7607.32 -23.08 -15 8009.10 -34.62 -20 8394.40 -46.15 -25 8765.18 -57.69 2 0 t 2 0 Shaping Our Future'rogether CITY OF BOZEMAN HYDRANT PRESSURE/FLOW REQUEST FORM Date: 11/16/12 Location Hydrant Static Pressure Pito Pressure Residual Pressure Littlehorse/ S. 3` Ave 1075 404 39# S. 3 Id Ave 1074 30 # Requested By: Matt Cotterman Fax# emailed Nozzle Size Flowed: 2.5" Done By: ES /JB Comments: 920 GPM >) tsss {'tssa - 2F6,5, i 1184 '' !1560�0 0, ./185 �jt1183 r L1082 11 %80 rl 112 r 1f . ,o -` :� 07s— r/,' lot 1078* 51�� 1077`�1078 r, �,r' Dec. 13. 2006 4:44PM No. 7633 P. 1 2 0 # 2 0 shopiv%Ow Fature'Iowher CITY OF BOZEMAN HYDRANT PRESSURE/FLOW REQUEST FORM Date: 12/13/2006 .Location Hydrant# Static Pressure Pito Pressure Residual Pressure S. 3' -Wagonwheel 1074 55# S.3 -Little Horse 1075 30# 25# Requested By: C&H Engineering/Matt Fax#: 587-9768 Nozzle Size Flowed:21/2" Done By:SA-TC Comments:1250 GPM ,10 1�' Q 156 �' .1187 • kp 1185 1188 1183 1189 1190 " �V 'f? 1082 1083 4 + � j) ` 109 107 11?�• 080 1 85 4 �1089 �075 r 1086 0 1088 11078 1�.z �CrO "`E t K 1Q87 r� / ✓ // i ` % Legend +------ l / / • Clew-M / oearatourii oa T" ` I / / // j �� / • Lamplgles PRINCei'N-P / ] Cape I �, a /� /•� • Tape o Teee / C / 8—Maeia ley mrtadap P /V Aeeeatoe C—to Cast lron / � i._......�_-wecownae�ao—__.__..._ .•• NGament / N Clay /. V Diictle Ion / 14V PVC � N Tile / I f e NVitrified Clay % / c ////slip line. r Rmda Parcel. / Parke city U'dta 2e / NE 1/4 Swion 25 T2S RSE G-10 l iAens zoo feet • r • Iaa,ppZslerlba mo IUiI / /./ �/ i• ME, / 01-A --------------- 39H SZl OCuwpuSp1lmN �. .o �;/ �� I:r•„i l - it ��.�% g / "i,� 1 9 \ r%Is r.r•.lu.c<:Il. ,•cr-,a,ir.,,. / wup apg//// -HL ',j, ' u.A•Lwq/V i�' / '::)•.•lil.li.I..AifIV.!S 11 •� A•la/V Iwumo.,V uoq l..3N (PV.I..Ap1.W.W .goWw•1 • �, ', ,, r .N.ucgo • /� / //// / r O pueBe-1 ! 1aa1 OOZ si ba yJm I 6_A 3911 SZ1 61 uapaS 0/1 MS /�. a,. .:..c-,,' \'� .a.,`•, I j/ Al z—L> ero„ed� ,/✓/;i :i a Ili* Li:\�r;.!'tl•) �/ / C°u(1 s OAd uoq a19 ON a waaurJe --FvN du•;�I:ut. eaQH ty /!� /! / AY\NOI•Ip1\4f we � // ////,. rs I flip:,?•.\O�_fiJp. \.:I:i+q / 1 ! odes [ eatoWuet • / % '/ egiaeeq • �j� /�� // ul •PUGBWI Lot 4A Minor Subdivision No. 35B - Downstream Sewer Impacts -per 2007 SewerCad Model Design Criteria Existing Pipes(Obligated Flow Scenario) + Lot 4A Lot 4A Flow Calculation: Subdiv. Dwellings Population Peaking Factor Infiltration Peak Flow(gpd) Lot 4A 9 18.99 4.38 752 8,160 The pipe segments listed below are the existing pipes downstream from Lot 4 that are identified in Appendix 6A-1 of the Wastewater Facility Plan (2007 update) as being over 30% of capacity under the obligated flow scenario. The last two columns on the right are the flow calculations with the addition of Lot 4A. Upstream Downstream Obligated Percent Peak Flow Percent Full • Label Manhole Manhole Diameter Slope Capacity Peak Flow Full w/Development w/ Development P-292 F0921 F0922 8 0.56% 534,456 238,538 44.6% 246,698 46.2% P-286 F0825 F0839 8 0.90% 675,608 245,378 36.3% 253,538 37.5% P-278 F0833 F0834 8 1.22% 787,131 260,655 33.1% 268,815 34.2% P-277 F0834 F0835 8 1.12% 753,720 262,450 34.8% 270,610 35.9% P-276 F0835 F0836 8 1.00% 712,154 270,738 38.0% 278,898 39.2% j P-275 F0836 F0837 8 1.00% 712,154 276,843 38.9% 285,003 40.0% P-274 F0837 F0838 8 1.12% 755,140 281,817 37.3% 289,977 38.4% P-273 F0838 F0745 8 1.34% 824,362 288,305 35.0% 296,465 36.0% P-272 F0745 F0746 8 1.49% 870,304 295,739 34.0% 303,899 34.9% P-266 F0746 F0747 8 1.48% 858,957 302,678 35.2% 310,838 36.2% P-265 F0747 F0751 8 0.45% 473,795 303,949 64.2% 312,109 65.9% P-254 F0755 F0756 12 0.23% 984,645 381,043 38.7% 389,203 39.5% P-425 F0715 F0716 20 0.17% 2,670,079 922,558 34.6% 930,718 34.9% P-3124 F0709 F0608 14 0.20% 1,310,962 928,370 70.8% 936,530 71.4% • P-3205 F0608 F0609 14 0.47% 2,169,017 1,500,283 69.2% 1,508,443 69.5% P-2398 F0609 F0610 14 0.50% 2,239,547 938,641 41.9% 946,801 42.3% P-4946 F0615 F0667 14 0.51% 2,261,643 960,835 42.5% 968,995 42.8% P-4940 F0667 G0501 14 0.57% 2,394,987 1,018,461 42.5% 1,026,621 42.9% P-3614 H0328 H0342 20 0.49% 5,797,384 2,215,343 38.2% 2,223,503 38.4% P-3613 H0342 H0341 20 1.08% 6,055,170 2,225,001 36.7% 2,233,161 36.9% P-1591 H0341 H0329 20 0.52% 5,787,616 2,226,313 38.5% 2,234,473 38.6% P-3992 H0329 H0369 20 0.37% 5,367,335 2,226,375 41.5% 2,234,535 41.6% P-3991 H0369 H0330 20 0.47% 5,508,495 2,278,864 41.4% 2,287,024 41.5% P-3997 H0330 H0346 24 0.45% 8,888,036 2,279,580 25.6% 2,287,740 25.7% P-1595 H0331 H0332 24 0.45% 8,915,378 2,341,800 26.3% 2,349,960 26.4% P-1596 H0332 H0333 24 0.45% 8,943,414 2,344,005 26.2% 2,352,165 26.3% P-1597 H0333 H0334 24 0.45% 8,967,043 2,382,415 26.6% 2,390,575 26.7% P-1598 H0334 H0335 24 0.45% 8,940,473 2,385,558 26.7% 2,393,718 26.8% P-1611 H0335 H0201 24 0.50% 9,427,186 2,560,398 27.2% 2,568,558 27.2% P-1612 H0201 H0219 24 0.49% 9,407,607 2,562,220 27.2% 2,570,380 27.3% P-1613 H0219 H0202 24 0.51% 9,449,712 2,625,260 27.8% 2,633,420 27.9% P-1614 H0202 H0203 24 0.50% 9,427,186 2,631,400 27.9% 2,639,560 28.0% P-1615 H0203 H0204 24 0.98% 12,647,897 2,713,265 21.5% 2,721,425 21.5% P-1616 H0204 H0205 24 0.90% 12,638,398 2,719,635 21.5% 2,727,795 21.6% P-1617 H0205 10106 24 0.83% 12,647,897 2,744,453 21.7% 2,752,613 21.8% P-1506 10106 10107 24 0.94% 12,998,004 5,664,071 43.6% 5,672,231 43.6% P-1507 10107 10115 24 0.40% 8,384,158 5,669,162 67.6% 5,677,322 67.7% P-3675 10115 10117 24 0.45% 8,382,765 5,669,542 67.6% 5,677,702 67.7% • P-3674 10117 10108 24 1.71% 16,706,148 5,688,295 34.0% 5,696,455 34.1% P-1510 10108 10109 24 0.75% 11,549,738 5,695,526 49.3% 5,703,686 49.4% P-1511 10109 10110 24 1.20% 14,298,904 5,744,502 40.2% 5,752,662 40.2% P-1512 10110 10111 24 0.99% 12,994,479 5,750,926 44.3% 5,759,086 44.3% P-1505 10111 10001 24 1.11% 13,726,190 5,761,082 42.0% 5,769,242 42.0% P-1504 10001 10002 24 1.11% 13,728,535 5,763,878 42.0% 5,772,038 42.0% P-1503 10002 10004 24 1.10% 13,725,415 5,774,011 42.1% 5,782,171 42.1% P-1465 10005 10006 24 1.11% 13,728,535 5,776,344 42.1% 5,784,504 42.1% P-3082 10006 10007 24 0.57% 10,004,044 5,777,477 57.8% 5,785,637 57.8% P-3083 10007 10008 24 0.94% 12,567,079 5,778,953 46.0% 5,787,113 46.0% P-1489 10008 10009 24 0.98% 13,198,060 5,785,621 43.8% 5,793,781 43.9% P-1488 10009 10010 24 1.04% 13,129,872 5,908,602 45.0% 5,916,762 45.1% P-3251 10010 15001 24 1.04% 13,332,054 5,910,803 44.3% 5,918,963 44.4% P-3250 15001 15002 24 1.05% 13,332,054 5,912,562 44.3% 5,920,722 44.4% P-3249 15002 15004 24 1.09% 14,304,869 5,913,614 41.3% 5,921,774 41.4% P-3265 15004 15006 24 0.60% 8,305,128 5,913,910 71.2% 5,922,070 71.3% • P-3252 15006 15010 30 0.51% 17,067,095 6,826,342 40.0% 6,834,502 40.0% P-3253 15010 15011 30 0.44% 17,270,493 6,827,398 39.5% 6,835,558 39.6% P-3059 15011 15025 36 0.63% 31,218,283 13,176,403 42.2% 13,184,563 42.2% P-3058 15025 15026 36 0.50% 27,821,783 13,178,652 47.4% 13,186,812 47.4% P-4101 15026 0-1 36 2.70% 64,622,732 13,179,425 20.4% 13,187,585 20.4% APPENDIX D TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS/ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY • • *ibelin traffic Traffic Impact Study services Ellis view Residential Development Bozeman, Montana • Prepared For: Mahar Montana Homes 1627 W. Main Street, #370 Bozeman, MT 59718 July, 2013 • 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana 59601 406-459-1443 • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana Table of Contents A. Executive Summary......:................................:.:-............................................I B. Project Description........................................................................................I C. Existing Conditions.........................................................................................1 Adjacent Roadways...............................................................................I TrafficCounts........................................................................................2 Sacajawea Middle School.....................................................................3 Levelof Service.....................................................................................3 D. Proposed Development..............................................................................4 E. Trip Generation and Assignment................................................................4 F. Trip Distribution ..........................................................................................6 G. Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development............... ..............................6 H. Impact Summary& Recommendations......................................................7 List of Figures Figure 1 — Proposed Development.Site....................................................................2 • Figure 2— Proposed Development..........................................................................5 Figure3— Trip Distribution......................................................................................6 List of Tables Table 1 — Historic Traffic Data.................................................................................3 Table 2— 2013 Level of Service Summary..............................................................3 Table 3— Trip Generation Rates.............................................................................4 Table 4— Level of Service Summary With Development........................................7 • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana Ellis View Residential Development Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, Montana A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ellis View development is a five-acre residential subdivision located east of South 3rd Avenue in Bozeman, Montana. The property would be developed to include up to nine residential units. Once completed the development would produce 86 daily trips. As proposed, the Ellis View development will have little to no impact on the surrounding road system. All nearby intersections will continue to function at acceptable levels of service and no additional improvements will be required at any area intersections. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from a proposed five- acre residential development near the southern end of South 3`d Avenue in Bozeman, Montana. The document also identifies any traffic mitigation efforts that the development may require. The site is located east of South 3`d Avenue '/4 mile north of Goldenstein Lane. The property • would be developed to include up to nine new residential lots. Based on the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, the developers must study all effected intersections with %2 mile of the proposed development which includes the intersections of South 3`d Avenue with Goldenstein Lane, Wagon Wheel Road, Dartmouth Drive, and Cambridge Drive. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development property currently consists of a five-acre parcel of undeveloped land located near the south end of South 3`d Avenue. The proposed development property consists of an undeveloped field south of the Sourdough Creek Properties Subdivision. The topography in this area is flat. See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Adjacent Roadways South 3rd Avenue is a two-way north/south route that provides access to the residential areas and schools in the southern portion of Bozeman. North of Wagon Wheel Road the road has a paved width of 40-50 feet with bike lanes on both sides of the road. Near Sacajawea Middle school the road has a designated center left-turn lane. South of Wagon Wheel Road South 3rd Avenue narrows to 28 feet with no bike lanes. South 3`d Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH which changes to 25 MPH near the school during the morning and afternoon drop- off and release times using a variable message sign with flashers. The roadway currently carries 2,120 Vehicles Per Day(VPD). • Abelin Traffic Services 1 July 2013 • • • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana Figure 1- Proposed Development Site Ilk r ht i .i. fyl'ti i •n i .J � .�' �� a.• '. icy' �+�' �e a:. n ♦.rt ❑_ 'f' ^..� �� 79 is' ►f Proposed �' �G- , �.•. . Development-Sttb Traffic Counts In July 2013 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected turning movement counts at intersections along South 3`d Avenue and 24-hour ADT data along South 3`d Avenue. These counts included the intersections of Goldenstein Lane, Wagon Wheel Road, Dartmouth Drive, and Cambridge Drive. The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report. It is acknowledged that these summer traffic counts do not fully represent average traffic volumes in this area because school was not in session during the traffic count. Due to time constraints for the submission of this project, traffic counts could not be performed during the school year. In order to help compensate for the school traffic in this area, ATS obtained detailed traffic count data for South 3`d Avenue from the Montana DOT for the past five years. This data included hour traffic counts along south 3`d Avenue north of Cambridge Drive in both the fall and spring. This data was compared to the hourly traffic data collected in the summer of 2013 to determine how much different traffic volumes are during the summer compared to during the school year. An analysis of the data indicates that there is 3.4 times more traffic during the AM peak hour and 2.1 times more during the PM peak hour as compared to the summer count. These factors were used when performing • Abelin Traffic Services 2 July 2013 • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana the LOS calculations for this area to more accurately represent average traffic volumes in this area. It should be noted that the PM peak hour of traffic generation from the Ellis View Subdivision does not match with the afternoon peak hour of traffic at Sacajawea Middle School. For the purposes of this report only the morning and evening peak hour traffic from the development was studied. The afternoon peak traffic from the school will be insignificantly impacted by this subdivision. Abelin Traffic Services obtained historic traffic data for South 3`d Avenue from the Montana DOT. This data is presented in Table 1. The traffic volume rocords for this area indicate that traffic volumes along South 3`d Avenue are well within the functional capacity of this type of urban roadway. Traffic volumes on this road have increased slowly over the past ten years. Table 1 - Historic Traffic Data Location 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1 2012 2013 South Ta Ave. North 1,840 1,840 1,840 1, of Cambridge Drive 780 1,730 2,500 2,650 1,650 2,370 2,120 Sacajawea Middle School - • The Sacajawea Middle School is located along the west side of South 3`d Avenue just south of Cambridge Drive. The School has a designated parent/student drop-off area along the north side of the school and a.separate school bus loading and unloading area along the east side of the school with two separate approaches onto South 3`d Avenue. The school currently has 600 students grades 61h to 8ih. School runs from the end of August to the middle of June. Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) - Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 5.3. Intersections are graded from A to F 'representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak-hour conditions. Table 2 shows the existing 2013 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from the Ellis View development. This analysis incorporates the 340% AM and 210% PM traffic volume increases on the road system to more closely match school traffic conditions. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C. Table 2 shows that all of the existing intersections along South P Avenue are currently operating within acceptable limits. No interaction modifications are needed at this time. • Abelin Traffic Services 3 July 2013 0 • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana Table 2 -2013 Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Sec. LOS Delay Sec. LOS South 3` Avenue & 15.7 C 12.2 B Goldenstein Lane South 3` Avenue & 11.5 B 10.0 A Wagon Wheel Road South 3rd Avenue & 10.2 B 9.6 A Dartmouth Drive South 3rd Avenue & 13.2/11.1 B/B 10.1/11.3 B/B Cambridge Drive D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development currently under consideration for this site includes five acres of land east of South 3`d Avenue which would be developed into a residential subdivision. The development would include up to nine residential lots. Access to the site would be provided through two new approaches onto South 3`d Avenue located 300 feet apart. The development would have several trails connecting to the existing trail system to the east. The Ellis View Subdivision site plan is shown in Figure 2. E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes from the proposed development using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Seventh Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle "trip" is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and _evening peak hours. According to the ITE trip generation rates, at full build-out the developments would produce 7 AM peak hour trips, 9 PM peak hour trips, and 86 daily trips. Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Total AM PM Peak Total PM Hour Trip Peak Hour Trip Peak Weekday Total Ends per Hour Trip Ends per Hour Trip Trip Ends Weekday Land Use Units Unit Ends Unit Ends per Unit Trip Ends Single-Family Residential 9 Units 0.75 7 1.01 9 9.57 86 . Abelin Traffic Services 4 July 2013 • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana Figure 2 - Proposed Development \\ \\ y I s 0. \ \ \ \2Q / O� C-4 O w QZV / JV� I/P�%6N y mQ FN 0� �Qy Fly �" i IS J� tiN Sao -- - e� I - 2 1�,i1,OW 2" I L d Zi U _3& t a� u2 c I ^• w.w - a 1 bk no ,C _ 3JNd5 M3d5 `I 1301 W1. S-V :DNIJOZ MSM .10114 4 t 8 Nil C y J a 9 IP Abelin Traffic Services 5 July 2013 0 • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed subdivision was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and the peak-hour turning volumes. Based on field observations, half of the traffic from the residential areas along South 3`d .Avenue utilize Goldenstein Lane presumably to reach South 19`h and approach the City of Bozeman from that direction. The other half of the traffic from this area travels north into Bozeman along South 3`d Avenue. Traffic is expected to distribute onto the surrounding road network as shown on Figure'3. Figure 3-Trip Distribution 50% a> c a> Q v w Proposed o Development Cl) Site 0 0 45/a Goldenstein Lane 5�� G. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the Ellis View subdivision is shown in Table 3. These calculations are based on the projected model volumes included in Appendix B of this report. Table 4 indicates that the construction of the Ellis View subdivision will have little effect on the traffic conditions within the area. All area intersection will continue to function at LOS C or better at full build-out and no additional mitigation measures will be needed to improve intersection capacity. Traffic volumes on South 3`d Avenue will increase by approximately 2%. This small increase should not create a noticeable impact at any intersection. An evaluation of the turning lane warrants indicates that none of these intersections would benefit from the installation of additional left- or right-turn lanes. Abelin Traffic Services 6 July 2013 0 • • Ellis View Traffic Impact Study Bozeman,Montana Table 4 -Level of Service Summary With the Ellis View Development AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Sec. LOS Delay Sec. LOS South 3rd Avenue & 15.8 C 12.3 B Goldenstein Lane South 3ra Avenue & 11.5 B 10.0 A Wagon Wheel Road South 3`1 Avenue & 10.2 B 9.7 A Dartmouth Drive South 3` Avenue & 13.3/11.1 B/B 10.1/11.3 B/B Cambrid a Drive South 3` Avenue & New 10.6 B 10.5 B South Approach South 3r Avenue & New 10.6 B 10.5 B North Approach H. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS • As proposed, the Ellis View development will have little to no impact on the surrounding road system. All nearby intersections will continue to function at acceptable levels of service and no additional improvements will be required at any area intersections. • Abelin Traffic Services 7 July 2013 r i • APPENDIX A Traffic Data i Basic Volume . • Station ID : S3RD Last Connected Device Type : Unic-L Info Line 1 : ATS Version Number: 1.41 Info Line 2 : UNICORN#1 Serial Number: GPS Lat/Lon : Number of Lanes : 1 DB File : S3RD.D6 Posted Speed Limit : Lane #1 Configuration # Dir. Information Volume Mode Volume Sensors Divide By 2 Comment 1. NB Normal Axle Yes Lane#1 Basic Volume Data From: 14:00-07/08/2013 To: 13:59-07/10/2013 Date DW 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Total 070813 M __ 111 86 94 122 97 71 74 52 24 6 737 070913 T 6 2 0 0 2' 12_� 30 114 113 129 116 101 121__1 24 115 140 130 162 124-89 64_ 67' 16�9 1786 071013 W 2 0 0 0 4 7 31 108 123 101 98 108 129 127 838 Month Total 8 2 0 0 6 19 61 222 236 230 214 209 250 251 226 226 224 284 221 160 138 119 40 15 3361 Percent: 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 8% 7% 5% 4% 4% 1% 0% ADT: 4 1 0 0 3 10 31 111 118 115 107 105 125 126 113 113 112 142 111 80 69 60 20 8 1684 t Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total Percent DW Totals: 0 737 1786 838 0 0 0 Weekday(Mon-Fri): 3361 100% • #Days: 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 ACT: 1681 ADT: 0 1769 1786 1437 0 0 0 Weekend(Sat-Sun): 0 0% Percent: 0% 22% 53% 25% 0% 0% 0% ACT: 0 Centurion Basic Volume Report Printed:07123113 Page 1 9 . • Montana Department Short Term Profile Location ID: 16-3B-112 of Transportation MD7* For Year• 2013 Functional Class: Collector-Urb Gallatin County Traffic Factor Group: UMC 3tation.3B-112 S 3rd Av, N of Cambridge Dr Tech: ROY (STP) Year 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 AADT 2,120 2,370 1,650 2,650 2,500 1,730 1,780 1,840 1,840 1,840 2,350 2,620 Source A A A E A E E L L L L L HOURLY FULL DETAIL Date Bin Road 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 TOTAL 06/16 Volume T 3 2 1 0 3 8 25 166 397 91 108 128 115 121 121 309 210 217 166 80 76 38 12 5 2,401 RAW BIN DETAIL Date Bin Road 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 TOTAL 05114 Volume T N N N N N N N N N N N 111 114 108 130 309 215 219 180 95 77 46 9 2 1615 05115 Volume T 3 2 0 0 2 10 26 166 395 91 111 134 112 141 119 303 190 200 172 87 81 35 10 7 2397 05/16 Volume T 0 2 2 0 1 11 24 163 399 91 105 121 118 113 116 314 225 233 145 57 69 32 17 6 2363 05117 Volume T 7 1 2 0 5 4 25 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 44 FACTOR USED:0.882 ACF.•0.928 UMC, SDOWF.0.950 UMC "NOTES-- None Source Legend: A(Actual),E(Estimate),M(Manually Entered), L(Legacy), C(Unknown) j Page 1 Printed 71212013 7:10:02 AM I Abelin I raffic Services 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 telin Traffic Services File Name : gold 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/15/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1-Bank 2 S3RD GOLDENSTEIN 3STS GOLDENSTEIN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Th. Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int.Total 07:30 AM 8 0 0 0 3 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 37 07:45 AM 10 0 1 0 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19 0 62 Total 18 0 1 0 6 27 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 28 0 99 08:00 AM 20 0 3 0 3 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 9 0 71 08:15 AM 13 0 2 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 58 08:30 AM 10 0 2 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20 0 60 08:45 AM 18 0 1 0 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 16 0 63 Total 61 0 8 0 9 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 54 0 1 252 sss BREAK*** 04:30 PM 15 0 1 0 5 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 12 1 68 04:45 PM I l 0 2 0 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 17 0 68 Total 26 0 3 0 9 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 29 1 136 05:00 PM 17 0 3 1 4 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 18 0 70 05:15 PM 16 0 1 0 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 21 0 75 05:30 PM 27 0 5 0 6 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 24 0 94 05:45 PM 13 0 4 0 5 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 22 0 84 OTotal 73 0 13 1 21 55 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 74 85 0 1 323 rand Total 178 0 25 1 45 196 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 166 196 1 810 Apprch% 87.3 0 12.3 0.5 18.5 80.7 - 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 45.7 54 0.3 Total% 22 0 3.1 0.1 5.6 24.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 20.5 24.2 0.1 Unshifted 167 0 24 1 40 181 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 158 187 1 761 %Unshifted 93.8 0 96 100 88.9 92.3 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 95.2 95.4 100 94 Bank 1 4 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 17 •Bank 1 2.2 0 0 0 2.2 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 2.1 Bank 2 7 0 1 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 0 32 •Bank 2 3.9 0 4 0 8.9 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 4.6 0 4 • Abelin I raffic Services 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 • Abelin Traffic Services File Name : gold 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/15/2013 Page No : 2 S3RD GOLDENSTEIN 3STS -30LDENSTEIN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds A .Tani Right Thru Left Peds App.TOW Right Thru Left Peds All.Tool Right Thru I Left Peds App.To.1 1.1.Toml Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 11:45 AM-Peak 1 of I Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 20 0 -3 0 23 3 25 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 9 0 20 71 08:15 AM 13 0 2 0 15 2 24 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 0 17 58 08:30 AM 10 0 2 0 12 1 20 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20 0 27 60 08:45 AM 18 0 1 0 19 3 14 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 16 0 27 63 Total Volume 61 0 8 0 69 9 83 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 54 0 91 252 %App.Total 88.4 0 11.6 0 9.8 90.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.7 59.3 0 PHF .763 .00E .667 .000 .750 .750 .830 .000 .000 .821 .00E .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 _841 .675 .000 .843 1 .887 S3RD Out In Total 63 691 1 132 61 0 8 0 Right Thru Left Peds • Peak Hour Data o C w 2 North "' o0 m 4—�m c 2 oO L Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 A w S Z J N O tr l Unshi ted �x m O s� o y Bank 1 Z O a Ba k2 CD a N O 4, T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 0 0 0 0 I� Out In Total • is Abelin I raffic Services 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 Abelin Traffic Services File Name : gold 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/15/2013 Page No : 3 S3RD GOLDENSTEIN 3STS GOLDENSTEIN Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Rig ThT Ped Rig Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Left Ped Start Time ht I u Left s *" ht u s °° ht u s *'" ht u s Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 17 0 3 1 21 4 14 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 18 0 31 70 t 05:15 PM 16 0 1 0 17 6 11 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 21 0 41 75 05:30 PM 27 0 5 0 32 6 14 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 24 0 42 94 05:45 PM 13 0 4 0 17 5 16 0 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 22 0 45 84 Total volume 73 0 13 1 87 21 55 0 1 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 85 0 159 323 %App.Total 83.9 0 14.9 1.1 27.3 71.4 0 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 46.5 53.5 0 PHF .676 .000 .650 .250 .680 .875 .859 .000 .250 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .804 .885 .000 .883 .859 MD Out In Total 06 87 193 731 01 13 1 Right Thru Left Peds I Peak Hour Data m ul J� O ~ON N L� W v 2 North O N rr zc� 2t„ W O, Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 Ph Z L� v Cn O tY Unshifted ��o m s� o H Bank 1 z O aBan 2 m — d a N� T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 Out In Total • • Abelin 1 raffic Services • 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 fault Comments File Name : camb Change These in The Preferences Window Site Code : 00000000 Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Start Date : 7/9/2013 Then Click the Comments Tab Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Class 1 S 3RD CAMBRIDGE S 3RD CAMBRIDGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int.Total 07:15 AM 0 7 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 07:30 AM 1 10 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 20 0 1 0 0 1 0 37 07:45 AM 1 0 11 2 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 17 3 1 0 0 1 0 39 Total 1 28 5 0 6 0 2 1 0 47 3 2 0 0 2 0 97 08:00 AM I 0 6 0 0 4 0 1 1 I 0 17 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 33 08:15 AM 0 11 2 I 5 0 0 6 0 14 1 0 1 0 1 0 36 08:30 AM 0 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 14 0 2 2 0 0 0 34 •rs BREAK♦rr Total 0 27 2 1 13 0 1 1 1 2 45 2 2 5 0 1 I 1 103 ss•BREAK srs 04:30 PM 2 7 3 O I 1 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 I 0 0 0 2 24 04:45 PM 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 4 0 0 1 0 0 30 Total 4 14 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 22 4 0 0 1 0 2 54 05:00 PM 2 10 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 3 0 30 05:15 PM 3 19 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 15 0 0 1 1 0 0 47 05:30 PM 0 11 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 Alligrand Total 10 109 18 2 25 1 6 3 7 155 11 4 6 2 6 3 368 Apprch% 7.2 78.4 12.9 1.4 71.4 2.9 17.1 8.6 4 87.6 6.2 2.3 35.3 11.8 35.3 17.6 Total% 2.7 29.6 4.9 0.5 6.8 0.3 1.6 0.8 1.9 42.1 3 1.1 1.6 0.5 1.6 0.8 • • Abelin I raffic Services 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 Default Comments File Name : camb Change These in The Preferences Window Site Code : 00000000 Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Start Date : 7/9/2013 Then Click the Comments Tab Page No : 2 S 3RD CAMBRIDGE S 3RD CAMBRIDGE Southbound Westbound - Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A-TMI Right I Thru I Left Peds App.TWI Right Thru I Left Peds App.Tam Right Thru I Left Peds App.Tool Int.Totn1 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:15 AM to 11:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 1 10 0 0 11 2 0 1 1 4 0 20 0 1 21 0 0 1 0 1 37 07:45 AM 0 11 2 0 13 3 0 1 0 4 0 17 3 1 21 0 0 1 0 1 39 08:00 AM 0 6 0 0 6 4. 0 1 1 6 0 17 1 0 18 2 0 0 1 3 33 08:15 AM 0 11 2 1 14 5 0 0 0 5 0 14 1 0 15 1 0 1 0 2 36 Total volume 1 38 4 1 44 14 0 3 2 19 0 68 5 2 75 3 0 3 1 7 145 14 App.Total 2.3 86.4 9.1 2.3 73.7 0 15.8 10.5 0 90.7 6.7 2.7 4-2 0 42.9 14.3 PHF 250 .864 .500 .250 .786 .700 .000 .750 .500 .792 .000 .850 .417 .500 .893 .375 .000 .750 .250 .583 .929 S 3RD Out In Total 85 44 129 L 11 38 4 1 Right Thru Left Peds • Peak Hour Data O w o North a o r �� —2 9 c m Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 A S A QLrn-� r in p U 2 l lass 1 w r0rt or d n N w N 4, T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 5 68 01 2 ® 75 0 Out In Total i Abelin 1 raffic Services • 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 fe0fault Comments File Name : cam b Change These in The Preferences Window Site Code : 00000000 Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Start Date : 7/9/2013 Then Click the Comments Tab Page No : 3 S 3RD CAMBRIDGE S 3RD CAMBRIDGE Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Rig nr Ped Rig Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Left Ped Rig Thr Ped Start Time ht u Left s ""T"' ht u s ""' ht u s "°�" ht u Left s Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:30 PM-Peak 1 of I Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 2 7 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 4 0 18 0 1 0 0 1 30 05:00 PM 2 10 2 0 14 0 1 1 1 3 1 8 1 0 10 0 0 3 0 3 30 05:15 PM 3 19 2 0 24 2 0 2 0 4 2 15 0 0 17 1 1 0 0 2 47 05:30 PM 0 11 2 1 14 3 0 0 0 3 1 18 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 37 Total volume 7 47 8 1 63 5 1 3 1 10 4 55 6 0 65 1 2 3 0 6 144 'pp- .Total 11.1 74.6 12.7 1.6 50 10 30 10 6.2 84.6 9.2 0 16.7 33.3 50 0 PHF 583 .618 I.00 .250 .656 .417 .250 .375 .250 .625 .500 .764 .375 .000 .813 .250 .500 .250 .000 .500 .766 S 3RD Out In Total 63 631 1 126 71 47 1 8 1 Right Thru Left Peds • Peak Hour Data ` O 0 w C14 North a c m Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P S 22 Q L� r O _ U iCD Class r�w m O �CL m C+ a°' +i T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 6 55 41 0 51 65 116 Out In Total S 3RD t • Abelin I raffic Services • 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 fAelin Traffic Services File Name : dartam 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/9/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted S3RD DARTMOUTH S3RD DARTMOUTH Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right F Th. Left Peds Right Th. Left Peds Right I Th. Left Peds Right Thru I Left Peds Int.Total 07:30 AM 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 19 07:45 AM 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 2 0 2 0 31 Total 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 2 0 4 0 50 08:00 AM 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 32 08:15 AM 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 2 0 0 0 27 08:30 AM 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 0 0 1 0 31 08:45 AM 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 28 Total 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 3 1 3 0 3 0 1 118 Grand Total% 4.8 41.7 I 0 94 0 O I 0 0 0 O I 0 59 0 3 I 5 0 7 O I 168 Apprch 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95.2 0 0 58.3 0 Total% 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.1 0 1.8 3 0 4.2 0 • • T • II Abelin I raffic Services 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 telin Traffic Services File Name dartam 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/9/2013 Page No : 2 S3RD DARTMOUTH S3RD DARTMOUTH Souhbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound S[artTime Right Thru I Left I Peds App.Taal Right Thru Left Peds App.TWI Right Thru I Left Peds A .Taal Right Tani I Left Peds App.Tam lal.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:30 AM to 08:45 AM-Peak I of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 2 0 2 0 4 31 08:00 AM 0 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 12 1 0 0 0 1 32 08:15 AM 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 2 27 08:30 AM 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 14 0 0 1 0 1 31 Total Volume 0 67 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 3 46 5 0 3 0 8 121 %App.Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93.5 0 6.5 62 55 0 37.5 0 PHF .000 .882 .000 .000 .882 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .827 .000 .750 .821 .625 .000 .375 .000 .500 .945 S3RD Out In Total 46 671 113 01 67 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds • Peak Hour Data I -o U0o = o North ro t—► 4--= D Oc A Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 A 2 0 59 L� r o 0 o i U shifted O oa v o d fD m a Ho o— 4, T F+ Left Thru Ri ht Peds 01 431 01 3 72 6 1 8 Out In Total • Ii Abelin IT raffic Services • 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 felin Traffic Services File Name : dartpm 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/8/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted S3RD DARTMOUTH S3RD DARTMOUTH Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int.Total 04:15 PM 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 20 04:30 PM 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 04:45 PM 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 26 Total 2 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 1 1 0 2 0 62 05:00 PM 3 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 24 05:15 PM 3 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 45 05:30 PM 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 1 2 0 0 0 33 Grand Total 9 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 3 2 3 0 4 0 164 Appreh% 10.2 89.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92.8 4.3 2.9 42.9 0 57.1 0 Total% 5.5 48.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 1.8 1.2 1.8 0 2.4 0 • • Abelin Traffic Services • 130 S. Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 telin Traffic Services File Name : dartpm 130 S. Howie Street Site Code : 00000000 Helena, MT 59601 Start Date : 7/8/2013 Page No : 2 S3RD DARTMOUTH S3RD DARTMOUTH Souhbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left I Peds App.Taal Right Thru Left Peds App.T-1 Right Thru Left Peds A,Tan, Right Thru Left Peds A .Tao' I;:; Peak Hour Analysis From 04:15 PM to 05:30 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 8 1 0 1 0 2 26 05:00 PM 3 10 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 10 0 0 1 0 1 24 05:15 PM 3 19 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 1 0 1 45 05:30 PM 1 17 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 1 13 2 0 0 0 2 33 Total Volume 7 62 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 3 2 53 3 0 3 0 6 128 %App.Total 10.1 89.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90.6 5.7 3.8 50 0 50 0 PHF .583 .816 .000 .000 .784 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .545 .375 .500 .602 .375 .000 .750 .000 .750 .711 S3RD Out In Total 511 1 691 1 120 71 621 01 0 Right Thru Left Peds • Peak Hour Data a J 0 ^�O x o North o O � so r—► —� D O c 2,,.,~ Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 P 0 5 L� r o 0 p E U s ifted r�o = O w m m 0 w - o o— +, T rr Left Thru Ri ht Peds 3 48 01 2 65 53 C� Out In Total • • APPENDIX B Traffic Model Ellis View Traffic Model Factored Traffic South 3 d Factored Traffic South 3 d AM Peak PM Peak Seasonal Factor 3 L 48 Seasonal Factor 15 4P L 11 3.4 129 1 0 2.1 99 1 4- 2 3 V r 10 Cambridge 17 V r 6 Cambridge 10 1 41 17 6 ? IFj 13 0 t 231 4 -0 t 116 10 'Z t* 0 2 Z j* 8 143 j L 17 101 l L 6 0 4 r 10 Dartmouth 6 y r 6 Dartmouth • t 228 t 130 e r 15 150 1 L 7 101 1 L 13 3 4 r 51 Wagon Wheel 6 4 r 29 Wagon Wheel t 221 t 118 r 20 r 6 201 1 L 211 1 L 4 r North Entrance 4 r North Entrance 1 241 t 201 Proposed Development Site Proposed Development Site 201 1 L 211 1 L 4 r South Entrance y r South Entrance 1 241 t 201 207 40 L 31 153 4P L 44 • 27 282 Goldenstein 27 to 1 4- 116 Goldenstein 184 J 179 126 14 155 �'► Ellis View Traffic Model Site Generated Site Generated Model Volumes South 3 d Model Volumes South 3 d AM Peak PM Peak L 40 L 1 1 «- 3 1 4- 4 r Cambridge 4 r Cambridge J 41 J 41 t 3 -'► t 2 z �► z Ir 1 1 L 3 i L {� r Dartmouth 4 r Dartmouth t 3 jr 2 • i t L 3 1 L 4 r Wagon Wheel r Wagon Wheel t 3 t 2 1 1 L 1 2 1 L 1 1 4 r 1 North Entrance 2 4 r 1 North Entrance t 1 j 1 If' 1 r 2 IN 2 Proposed Development Site IN 6 Proposed Development Site OUT S OUT 3 1 1 L 1 1 1 L 1 1 4 r 1 South Entrance 2 4 r 1 South Entrance t 1 j 2 e 1 r 2 3 1 2 3 • 2 � L 0 1 � IL1 1 4- Goldenstein 0 Goldenstein 1 J 2 J Ellis View Traffic Model Projected traffic South 3 d Projected traffic South 3 d AM Peak PM Peak 3 40 L 48 15 4 L 11 130 l 4- 0 102 1 «' 2 3 V r 10 Cambridge 17 r 6 Cambridge 10 J #1 17 6 J 13 0 t 234 4 t 117 10 Z 0 2 Z r 8 144 1 L 17 104 1 L 6 0 Ir r 10 Dartmouth 6 4 r 6 Dartmouth • Jr 230 t 132 0 r 15 151 1 L 7 104 l L 13 3 4 r 51 Wagon Wheel 6 4 r 29 Wagon Wheel t 224 t 119 20 6 201 1 L 1 212 1 L 1 1 4 r 1 North Entrance 2 4 r 1 North Entrance t 243 t 201 1 r 2 Proposed Development Site Proposed Develop=Site 202 1 L 1 212 1 L 1 1 4 r 1 South Entrance 2 V r 1 South Entrance Jr 242 t 202 e 1 r 2 209 4 L 31 155 40 L 45 • 28 111# 282 Goldenstein 28 116 Goldenstein 184 J 181 J 126 10 155 10 I • • • APPENDIX C LOS Calculations Two-Way Stop Control • • Page I of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection S 3rd&Goldenstein Agency/Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 711712013 Analysis Year 2013 nal sis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View East/West Street: Goldenstein North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: East-West [Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 184 126 282 31 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 206 141 0 0 316 34 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • , L T R L T R Volume veh/h 27 207 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.93 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 30 0 232 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 _0 ____F 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 206 262 C (m) (veh/h) 1220 597 lc 0.17 0.44 95%queue length 0.61 2.23 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 15.7 LOS A C Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 15.7 pproach LOS — -- C • Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 8:50 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k7lE8.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • 0 Page I of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LA Intersection S 3rd& Goldenstein Agency/Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 7,11712013 Analysis Year 2013 nal sis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Goldenstein North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 179 155 116 44 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 208 180 0 0 134 51 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 27 153 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.93 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 31 0 177 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 208 208 C (m) (veh/h) 1402 705 /c 0.15 0.30 5%queue length 0.52 1.23 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 12.2 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 12.2 pproach LOS I - -- B • Copyright m 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Geierated: 7/25/2013 8:50 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kF5AB.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control 0 • Page I of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RLA Intersection S 3rd&Wagon Wheel enc /Co. A TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 711712013 Analysis Year 2013 nal sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Wagon Wheel North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 221 20 3 150 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 237 21 3 161 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R I • Volume veh/h 51 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 3 61 C (m)(veh/h) 1318 615 lc 0.00 0.10 5%queue length 0.01 0.33 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 11.5 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 11.5 pproach LOS I - -- B • Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 8:50 AM file:///C:[Users/Bob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k4C46.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • Page I of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection S 3rd& Wa on Wheel Agency/Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 7,11712013 Analysis Year 2013 nal sis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Wagon Wheel North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 118 6 6 101 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 135 6 6 116 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 1 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT ! stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 29 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.93 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 33 0 14 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 6 47 C (m) (veh/h) 1455 772 lc 0.00 0.06 5%queue length 0.01 0.19 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 10.0 LOS A A Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.0 Approach LOS — -- A • copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 8:51 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k1302.tmp 7/25/2013 I 1 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information D RLA Intersection S 3rd&Dartmouth o. TS urisdiction ormed 711712013 nal sis Year 013 ime Period AM Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Dartmouth North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbotnd Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 228 0 0 143 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 245 0 0 153 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 10 0 18 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 0 28 (m)(veh/h) 1333 720 lc 0.00 0.04 5%queue length 0.00 0.12 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.2 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.2 Approach LOS — -- B Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 8:49 AM file:///C:/Users/Bob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9F87.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • Page I of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RLA Intersection S 3rd&Dartmouth enc /Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 7/17/2013 Analysis Year 2013 nal sis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View East/West Street: Dartmouth North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume veh/h 130 15 6 101 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 149 17 6 116 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.93 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 6 0 6 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Len th,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 6 12 C (m) (veh/h) 1424 789 lc 0.00 0.02 5%queue length 0.01 0.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.6 LOS A A Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 9.6 Approach LOS I - -- A • Copyright m 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Gererated: 7/25/2013 8:49 AM file:///C:/Users/Bob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kl3BO.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control . Page 1 of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information E t LA Intersection S 3rd& Cambrid e /Co. TS urisdiction erformed 7/17/2013 nal sis Year 2013 is Time Period M Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Cambridge North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 0 48 3 129 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 0 51 3 138 3 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 0 10 17 231 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 1 0 10 18 248 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 10 3 266 20 C (m) (veh/h) 1455 1568 703 1 614 lC 0.01 0.00 0.38 0.03 5%queue length 0.02 0.01 1.77 0.10 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.3 13.2 11.1 LOS A A 8 I 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 13.2 11.1 Approach LOS — -- 8 8 • Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 8:47 AM file:///C:[Users/Bob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k5B8F.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • 10 Page I of I • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information F l st LA Intersection S 3rd&Cambrid e nc /Co. TS urisdiction e Performed 7/17/2013 nal sis Year 2013 l sis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View East/West Street: Cambridge North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 13 116 8 17 99 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 150 10 22 128 19 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbotnd Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 4 2 6 2 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 5 2 7 2 14 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 16 22 23 14 (m)(veh/h) 1447 1432 728 1 587 lc 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 5%queue length 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.07 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 10.1 11.3 LOS A A B 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.1 11.3 pproach LOS I - -- 8 8 • Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Gene-ated: 7/25/2013 8:48 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k2DFD.tmp 7/25/2013 �I Two-Way Stop Control • Page I of I 40 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LA Intersection S 3rd& Goldenstein Agency/Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 7,11712013 Analysis Year With Development Analysis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Goldenstein North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 184 126 282 31 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 206 141 0 0 316 34 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR j stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 28 209 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.93 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 31 0 234 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 1 0__j 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 206 265 C (m)(veh/h) 1220 595 lc 0.17 0.45 95%queue length 0.61 2.28 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 15.8 LOS A C Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 15.8 pproach LOS I — -- C copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:04 AM file:///C:/Users/Bob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k16CE.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 1 of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information R RLA Intersection S 3rd&Goldenstein Co. TS urisdiction formed 711712013 nal sis Year With Develo ment Time Period AAA Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View East/West Street: Goldenstein North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 181 155 116 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 210 180 0 0 134 52 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 28 155 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.93 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 32 0 180 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 210 212 C (m) (veh/h) 1401 701 lc 0.15 0.30 5%queue length 0.53 1.27 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 12.3 LOS A 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 12.3 Approach LOS I - -- 8 • copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:05 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k7391.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control 0 • Page I of I • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ff LA Intersection S 3rd&Entra. TS urisdiction rmed IM 1712013 nal sis Year With Develo ment me Period Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Entrance North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 243 1 1 201 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 261 1 1 216 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 1 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 1 2 (m) (veh/h) 1314 644 lC 0.00 0.00 5%queue length 0.00 0.01 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.6 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.6 Approach LOS I - -- B • Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:04 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k67F4.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control 0 0 Page I of I • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst f7/1 A Intersection S 3rd&Entrance Agency/Co. S Jurisdiction Date Performed 712013 nal sis Year With Develo ment Period Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Entrance North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 201 2 2 212 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 231 2 2 243 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 . L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.93 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 1 0 1 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 2 2 C (m)(veh/h) 1346 654 lc 0.00 0.00 5%queue length 0.00 0.01 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.5 LOS A 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.5 pproach LOS — -- 8 • copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:04 AM file:///C:/TJsers/Bob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kCBOC.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • • Page I of I • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st RLA Intersection S 3rd& Na on Wheel enc /Co. ATS Jurisdiction Date Performed 711712013 Analysis Year With Development nal sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View EastNVest Street: Wagon Wheel North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 224 20 3 151 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 240 21 3 162 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 51 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 54 0 7 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 3 61 C (m) (veh/h) 1315 612 lc 0.00 0.10 5%queue length 0.01 0.33 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 11.5 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 11.5 pproach LOS — -- B Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:05 AM file:///C:AJsers/Bob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kD449.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LA Intersection S 3rd& Wagon Wheel Agency/Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 7/17/2013 Analysis Year With Development Analysis Time Period M Peak Hour Protect Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Wagon Wheel North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 119 6 6 104 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 136 6 6 119 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- — 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbot,nd Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 29 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.93 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 33 0 14 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 6 47 C (m)(veh/h) 1453 770 lc 0.00 0.06 5%queue length 0.01 0.19 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 10.0 LOS A A Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.0 pproach LOS — -- A • Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:06 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k23C3.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • . Page 1 of I • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection S 3rd&Dartmouth Agency/Co. A TS Jurisdiction Date Performed 711712013 Analysis Year With Development nal sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View East/West Street: Dartmouth North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South [Study Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 230 0 0 144 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 247 0 0 154 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 10 0 18 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 0 28 C (m)(veh/h) 1331 718 lc 0.00 0.04 5%queue length 0.00 0.12 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.2 LOS A B Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.2 pproach LOS — -- B • Copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:03 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k9CD3.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • • Page I of I • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information R r7ll'7/2013 Intersection S 3rd&Dartmouth Co. S urisdiction rtormed nal sis Year nth Develo ment Time Period Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Dartmouth North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 132 15 6 104 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.87 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 151 17 6 119 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.93 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 6 0 6 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 6 12 C(m) (veh/h) 1422 784 lc 0.00 0.02 5%queue length 0.01 0.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.7 LOS A I A Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 9.7 Approach LOS I - -- A Copyright®2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:03 AM file:///C:/Users/Bob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k384.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst RLA Intersection S 3rd&Cambridge Agency/Co. ATS Jurisdiction Date Performed 711712013 Analysis Year With Development Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Ellis View East/West Street: Cambridge North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 0 48 3 130 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 0 51 3 139 3 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 0 10 17 234 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate,HFR 10 0 10 18 251 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 10 3 269 20 C(m) (veh/h) 1453 1568 702 610 lc 0.01 0.00 0.38 0.03 5%queue length 0.02 0.01 1.80 0.10 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.3 13.3 11.1 LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 13.3 11.1 Approach LOS I - -- 8 8 • copyright O 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:02 AM file:///C:/Users/Bob%20Abelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2kA2C5.tmp 7/25/2013 Two-Way Stop Control 0 • Page 1 of 1 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst t711712013 LA Intersection SS 3rd& Cambrid e Agency/Co. TS Jurisdiction Date Performed Analysis Year With Development nal sis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Descri tion Ellis View East/West Street: Cambridge North/South Street: S 3rd Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 13 117 8 17 102 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 151 10 22 132 19 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR U stream Si nal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound [Hourly ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 • L T R L T R olume veh/h 6 4 2 6 2 11 eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Flow Rate, HFR 7 5 2 7 2 14 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay,Queue Length,and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 16 22 23 14 C(m) (veh/h) 1442 1430 725 583 lc 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 5%queue length 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.07 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 10.1 11.3 LOS A A 8 8 Approach Delay(s/veh) — -- 10.1 11.3 Approach LOS I - -- 8 8 • Copyright m 2010 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 7/25/2013 9:02 AM file:///C:/UsersBob%2OAbelin/AppData/Local/Temp/u2k326A.tmp 7/25/2013 IIIIIIIiIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIII fIIIIIIII I I zet I of 2 8 i III Ill 65A Shelley Vuge-Oallslln Co III nice 22.01 AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION NO.35 OF SOURDOUGH CREEK PROPERTIES The undersigned as record title owner of Lot 4 of Minor Subdivision No.35A of Sourdough Creek Properties,being more than 50%of the total area of said subdivision,does, pursuant to paragraph 1 I of the protective covenants for Minor Subdivision No.35 of Sourdough Creek Properties,filed for record on December 17, 1979 at 1:50 p.m.in Book 54 of Miscellaneous at page 523 with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,hereby change the covenants in pan as follows: 1. Paragraph 17 shall be amended to read: 17. PURPOSES OF THESE,RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. The purposes of the foregoing restrictions and covenants as to Lots 1,2,and 3 are to insure the use of the real property for attractive residences and enjoyable rural life and to secure to each lot owner the full benefit and enjoyment of his property with no greater restriction upon the free and undisturbed use of his land than is necessary to insure the same advantages to the other owners. The purpose of the covenants pertaining to Lot 4 are to insure the owner of said lot the right to use the premises and any buildings thereon for religious worship and for all activities that are now or may hereafter be generally sponsored by churches in this area,or such activities as may be reasonably sponsored by a church in the furtherance of religious education,promoting religious ideals and fellowship among the people,and aiding the spiritual,physical and mental well being of its members,and additionally the purpose of the covenants pertaining to Lot 4 are to insure the owner of said lot,the right to use the premises or any buildings thereon for any and all luwful residential purposes. These restrictions and covenants should be interpreted to accomplish these purposes. 11. All other provisions of said restrictive covenants shall remain in full force and effect. yAusAcps\misc%sourdough creek properties • IIIIIIIIII (IIII III III) l III 2198748 Pecs: 2 I IIIIIIIIIIIIUI�IIII I 2213oae tt:aaa Shelley Vence-Celletln Cc Mr nrSC 22.60 Dated this / day of ,2005. First Presbyterian Churc=ofa corporation By: President Attest: By: Secret y ACKNOWLEDGMENT On this day of 2005,before me,a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared Staiffey Cornell and Judith N.Patterson,known to me to be the President and Secretary of First Presbyterian Church of Bozeman,the corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledge to me that such corporation executed the same. In witness whereof,I have hereunto sct my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Printed Name: t:, of i4 e—D N Yi e.L L— {:j. <''.' Notary Public r the St.of MT ti��$;�t�«, :� •:;. Residing at: My Commissi n ct pi s:FaAgL-t t yausrkpslmisc\sourdough creek properties A PLAT OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO.35 A TRACT Of LAND LOCATED IN TY.E NE I/A,SEC.25.T.M. GALLATIN COUNT>,MONTANA, P_S.�tA.et melitSSm i e.V+vErr.te�eerepnt wewr•,.b w»r>a.rtlgnY•a w b..me.•e n w r •e>QI.IaA•r piattl Iwwbi-e[•. •d•er»[•r... y[ne pl•[•d nrell4•[i.t pr>�bifr�•tm�ta Seetdd. W bllmtq Arvm•A trw[of I•tl It• of 3•�e fenrd le [i/s,te:[lea)S:"To�}Ip f been.u •1>••a.>rleef ml NzlAlrn Meet•m.4IiaY (e�.y.`� •we blq`-ar cwicals'i�t»nlbe••felis.0 W lvlt•a u Y•sezeb•n sert••trat`u IA len]St Y baWY•.n•s w.t,e�eq tb •s-.••s trtlr L)r.• � r u1�It r«[.n er.».eat> Ili[-et+yr. ..tees an..>.tt.ae tee•e.•u•.m.oa.taa ' .`cls race-.r-••.>.•m.t.,m.er t>A.oi:«.e +..y.lc�e-.!-..l.t......n..t...s.=a t.. l.c er •+•imlm.Y.».�at�n•.e`e>•a+ t..l.w.`.t q.n.�t]Mrleaa-e.-.... .+. •Itt.,.f«c.u Y:`..•i�1t io[-er�y,r n t. ae.L ea•eu• >• c .lent.. ...... rel I n Y.ire.+.]�-,1.rle.. ay�iene�r-..T,e I.w�.or u•]t•ee•,a. JAJ•.tl"cal-w et,tit.t)t« a of a.x.at]n.st r Y)t•11 •t M«ts.mcal>rlta[<t+.l •]•na •k /ele,/e- Nf.L'L4I.�(�l7 a<itrt r]1>��4`f�wtrYuc;teeY<1'•�sf Aeecf.`Ttlr<.arnwe•t•t A•.e•t gM�wW�•N'Idt.l•AIC Ilium r ay • /NO OP/B.G�1� rlrt e'w;.•.1 rWi trt1rgi U K 1s• a••d r n •et Il+)il,f«r.« at•[•rm.t set C) teum �' e',t• use r »lS'nlr�t+;+.>.•Al.[..m• ).tt ere,t�Y. awe..MWq.lie Q NC/YOC10! lS YaDt't�P!!L Ielnl t.1 T•tr.•.t•rl rq.lr•mnt• pr•.w.l>r[t•11d!>AdtutW et •Iw.ltl lrtr. u! � 8�� ��/, v RMD - U4M+� l��•rt ef1Se•1 t m�bss d MI..a�•r.�Wl.f•4.r. 4lissb c.ay.•tn•[ • �_ m Ir•1 r eftr2TN+0 •n>.u•c•t.rtA!ev[d Fs"ISi�u•et Y•pmlle[er..•z.• �aem..>.t.rin.•sto.cr>m•ur �r•�•emtw `;.,T�T em.w�eel>.lrr.a]..e.mes d ta. � � II m [...a �.i�•t.A.e..me. $• ��A.,tr_.� +. .let:• /!�.�/ i_..... Oi L � LaoosAr l •>ea> y n •rmT� .l6//LSr.neu,�{.�d17. eJxem�Z �..tf+ %"tt• .... •+[.l t.�e..a t w e. •rls w"�'<la.>.e:e°w�:mttt�.e p /6S.M" CUH'E LYti l,l,,U•[.r•m. �M14[w Yr ate at 6 ! i /•re'SJ'aa• �.6.7G aT w TTei .e•et.s].meo.<� tt wd'�Rm.. > {lll t R•�'�• i.srt[.m.tRanr.] •t[trd.t et 44t s• .d l.a a u. aUllt.e•etr.t f•/I/.J�J- TLJ k L.•JJ/.J1' uw..rota. vi v � corr .-- pij i \ aaAc.w sLlfl:/-•.ev" 8 `•` ;fR/ Fe fle tnl• ey d�.-.• li:,,m:>.r,tee lewd. anile is lie tub e!aur..rsi]> E� � cars ` (oi--� 4 �=titiL ra a::.tl�•.ee:'<m<..`:.e:`A•"ry�.•-'��r.�'iq��ewtt]y I�m>.m"ri�.' aq ;py2/..e--- a� .cmml.Yq••G m r tf.t Y.,.mrlq�t aA,..�Np•->a.e.t.A tb tv.,aW Mt:�f..t�i.f mAlmtls�`u Y. S>Ca.[e - 1u1m G rev 4 1Ja' \ ` Jrm..,tesmfgr.•Wbtatl Rar»derl glwr W Im tet>elr le ab tert u[r,wrS,we.lll]of L WLp t�tstvel lit bPsm t�aAdy�•i Irf\� 1L�t•ee+•••t. lug t ' c.vlr.rr.. � I /r.srJ•oEpuncw To \ IJ� l.eA+.i.lm«•e rietlq.ec..sate..rria.i u.ewn�M aw �'�'' ]t1.. qy/��}ere•ru.ulm r.wlaW.. 5 e r/J"r:TT Jev/rN J,/wrevu( \ fibs o - R,vJe=n" v Rie.vr-ar-s r c� rruo at7EarENr a*corsrvucr oN r •—=t•• •. r.ra7r/' pr A LG4-LlE-S/G EAJCNCNr 9 m .>t I n e/r]ullonm -� tt'(O N!N sKbO Tf•m»Iq L•• arlre tm.rrme ae sf•.Ime Y I ll•[Y ssYw•f..'•.1 MCOelw,,/UNE w/r/S C/rENO(.a Ja.OJ./C. '.•.9 � vee Yl. 17� ✓11 v>et A�eJ 1,1t I eURIC LLli t>,*�g� m y w.ae few t eetenrtu s•� �t - ubl w i d•/J'Oc•JO- $ a\d � ml,�o>1• a n..�em[tn wt u•.wmz .tmmmlm pt.n ia�r� t cmrm.. RVJJc.ef" � C J.LIm r.e.)r»•tt.a -1-I t an.atn i ,-wl,.,c.....ly,,lie t1.*e.m.. r m rgel.rler. aL 7•COJ.OJ' $� lie ifv `. F•AO1 ei• Q .TFrTY `.T -s✓ � ___-- _-ZJo.a�•-�-- _.--_-- � <. r .�.-c .o-rrl-<a cr_ _ ra+az<ttr.tQ sn�veoo w cis oT- bl pD .ta.nu.tmr et•enalr s.nl<..el�y es bt.an ua��aul[b Y. w>l.t t.e n.m�l r u.'ie/rr �' a to.eA .Y. of «e •J CAJENENT S •l lai••W<•�esn s-t�nit pl•a�.s`blq er�ic•.G m aces w.� t �Wales. An14~a« I SPUR LL'Y/GN[RCEK.e'PQP NOTC:NO.dPCCr AC[CSJ r0 m[d c • /;�.�ea ec�-t�-..t•+.-• ,/[�. �//�2���/ '• • SLYIlF'fNIPD JVCNUF LRQM ��•D�[t r��•/ISL7f'e .rr.:7. Lore ,e;� - i::>av •ttlTCr eor./J o ae F/y(o trf.-a.r Y.>m...r m.w eteb.Ima.�rlutl.twv.e[....m rr.e.weeln wt w R!/L"•'/?Jo.VN/!Y'>t n.sCN 9 A rYURL<-el C ANO Ieces, 4c W br dll•uled•�tl b•teal U!r•�Y meter.m 1•. •crow.It.•d>eem•oeyt•Y• a'L•meeYtlm :;/qJm.n.-�y/ UJCJ O// tRURU! pv�lle.«d•.•o•T... m Y•et «I+fpe R�Jlt4s!m smr!rw. -'- J/Jd N/�!lNC.!y'O/./m'I Me!�.r'a�• 1� t /(���� /Mr, ,mxotsi,,ss N tl Yes.rl�e.>u1y�_...c..m,a dG�6Tet �T.S—r c E6 E•'/O �� T �7%t'ar eUwdM •� ,: _�,LC-mil► FtO I-.4K • o rC/ •>N-L/r-l/ MJ7C:Lal I R>lG r If AS'MC1E c t-iRIXLCO 1=lm" ana u> T SL"/•-•�-.Pr..,.•t/ G/ ItVNT�'�RTY filer NiAY 11/1 T 5%wzo BE esu&--s'EO -_--'U 54E LOT J. I PROJCCT AL0+6"we wr5r APT'UNC 4 LOT 4 f�•L••e y a w tu•`t�ey� J{ tllnem[I•t %trees-m4�ee`W AGLESS A Nr ra eC['JT/BL.Y✓!O AT&Ale ar �•+)uat.d taa.ee.:.Iicw tme ..6d6L. �, w�J� eL//co/N6 /°=R/I/f CRfr/UTiOw REV/C/f! 70TAL ARCH-e ro77 AGRCJ LOr/RCA-(./rCJ ALRCJ �' Av BL//LLYN6 w/rwW e"O,FUTURE [Ol 1140 AR(A•a.NII AlRES VfL/N/T1 y P JarT L/NES. „+q••: F �y„r. 1 ' _ `:•— .:;4,_rip•,..;1�'"�'_•- z ,.. +.. ... , Sj a •. .3 �� H a ,i ,',! HJ !e sH c" 8 S:a 8a"ssi! r= �� g g' y dH ! ,�• !d 9 Ha HH 9 14 a 6 Hy Se if/ 5 Z s� re��t�t.Hae��fi° � 1 � � H isgg ? •t¢ H e� �1= ��' �• � a9 a F�°s :•:- y t � � 9 •9. 9 r �! _ � �=! o "g a :t.ide i[is3 yH�_ , a F g"• � eH�R a �$ ! "i:') a H,o 5 •E�E� S ip �H N �' ee6";:F.oy: E7• r Hr H HF b H V b t b YA 0 3e rt`�ka = °«ae�, ' �a ea9 !H i H C bay• �99 _ Hd o e Fietivisar�ti.��[,� � H F " e j � � S ��I �!� gaa !J{ a!�� •s' I� a sa•i'%p@:e.iE• K4 . ��q� ! H� SF�"eeE�e•i:�Erai ap � _ 5}" ..�« " a � P�°� a!H r •� ' �e ceH�r� iS s9 §j4 1 all z N to tiFe�e®ESFEd�as jd , 8 ° Er 8 8 -ail gg Kqq q o« iA °E1eili e:aassl HH i R a e� k 'AH a At H_g z=_ ii • b�o�c ogy Q �il�� � i :���8 1 CL JJ yq Q �< b4 ri W EC�iE Io H yy• uZ 9 s ! ry' � I O•o'ON V/Jlo dblYd •,S l�J y • .VJ7YJ p'A.'Jt'V Y/7Rf a b ' a.�o Z fit' �,.• � ? fi� ��� � �@ ,rya' :c••� � � , Pik •o �y• � �� I ^ e .�..._. . _ -� ♦rN ;011 '�a,g•IEE 0 —I`"'---.Jiff--••r -1! CH•� °v8 8� v �< < ai \<Ay I Sa .xn .otfF.r 2 .mvry cnxr cry I :V4J w/"rr.rvwc �—'•7.rT3F7FTw'JJfdT'�'—^.�._��. Jo , . 1 yoisiniOGnS aonaw PLAT of 35 C MINOR SUBDIVISION No. ------- BEING LOT 4 OF MINOR SUBDIVISION No. 35—A A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NE1/4 SECTION 25, T2S, R5E, P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA I�'61>i+Pili*j�MNr+•y,r.vu MRr: N ggvM�vO.',W Wa,,"r5�1•G brui e(rW,pY VMI: y r•G•4lpvlgl r!r•• '"'�4W r..,wv1 51 wila i N 69'40'0'E 32J.29' , ' Y c \ L01 4A • p 6.0t0�CN[5 \ a • 5 560'W00'W 630,09• I 't a soWolo rw Kti ti,.ra,v.,r✓• ,l •q�'wry«*rs'�'.`«"«4"w�.�r,pN4:r�4 rNa««u.•,n w«,P,r, ..,°,',C^�i�.a""w ��rWr�w�~•'�'��.'v"• �M T.�+a,«w+r r.w «.y....,�...,• om.ew a.«..,�«,r.N'f/_�.JYaM rsn.- •�E, .rrN:ti.; :W :w,.•.,N...s.,.«....4.w..r«...war.srr,.nr,•a....,a«.e.r4. e�'f.r..��r�'•.r��•••ti.. �!'t i'f Mt u N nr Mtirr.�a.r w•r"wr r.�rwr rrr«•rw..unvw.P w M Mw.s n.avea.N4:.rv..�1^. I t 1ww r,'v":r4 1•`-war o«r a.«..it.'iw•Iw..'rl w�'n.✓.�,� "�.M�a1 r.«,«•"•.n w�� ' •5 ' �r0 r«..>rG ri.Ooc.,:'�wv.r,lM wiu«.MP•«.w YaN ln+"�iwrr f:-..e..r.rY�wn •. nrr tN IW f•urlwuy.�L14n wn'n w h~�✓I•M.rW Y«�M4 5P�.nw�H�„rNPN"'w�.h:Y"«r".rr•�.•4 W VY 11 O OYrT sqe, �««n«.r1 4 w.�r«...r,rrPPr,«s..'r.»«..ry.r rr•r v.wvr,M,N vwv Fn./rM«.p..: ���.�wr_nww r CM+fry.•Wr«�•w,• nr nu rN.<rt«rr r N. ,".Yr r.rv« r,u.r N r" nr r�'r'�r"."i•�r�"1"r'rr'w.lw nv•rv�yW ,.4«.«..,. , w o."o r.- .«r."..�.'.a"::....«..", w «!r''s,•,I�.tun«„-'�i�„L, 'i`rr��.r�1.. ,��T,:"iiw•�d�;�.t,«r__ as r..-lfr_' _«rP_A' � •ru. •o aw.,®m S«`C,.`_:='::o',a.;:.:":..".e.`C«".s".ar.c:.s..r.a...".°i^.1'•.r'.` ,., .`^",fir..—..�+..,h:""' �r,•.11C•�«,«...�.'i•:y..�...__w. Di•.nt. a:.r.r� --- "+•`n 2224876 CASMN EXCINE MNC ID]ffJNltlI�iDBiDIDQ:.-.::•... SUYI'L,7A'L'•��'�� June 20, Z-13131, Desi n Review Board Staffor APEllsView Re ortP fPage 1 of 23 `` g 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Date: Design Review Board meeting is on June 26, 2013 Item: A preliminary Planned Unit Development in conjunction with a major subdivision with nine residential lots, two open space parcels, and a park parcel. Owner/Applicant: Mahar Montana Home, 1627 W. Main Street, #370, Bozeman MT 59718 Representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying, 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Report By: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager Project Location: 3601 Good Medicine Way. It is legally described as Lot 4A, Minor Subdivision 35C, located in the NE 1/4, Sec. 25, T.2S, R5E, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with conditions Table of Contents MAPSERIES.................................................................................................................................. 2 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.................................................................... 5 CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAN CORRECTIONS............................................... 5 RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS...................................................................... 6 STAFFANALYSIS........................................................................................................................ 7 Applicable Plan Review Criteria, Section 38.19.100, BMC........................................................... 7 Applicable Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria, Section 38.19.100, BMC.......................... 11 Applicable Planned Unit Development Review Criteria, Section 38.20.090.E, BMC................. 1.3 APPENDIX A—ADVISORY CODE CITATIONS..................................................................... 17 APPENDIX B—PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY..................................... 19 APPENDIX C—NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ......................................................... 20 APPENDIX D—REQUESTED RELAXATIONS........................................................................ 21 APPENDIX E—PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT................................................. 22 0 June 20, Z-13131, D•n Review Board Staff Report for the Ellis View Page 2 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development MAP SERIES _T Roll x RS Subject Properly RSA A Vicinity Map showing adjacent zoning Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses North: Single detached homes: zoned RS, Residential Suburban South: Open Space and future commercial: zoned RS, Residential Suburban East: Single detached homes: zoned RS, Residential Suburban West: Unannexed, agriculture: zoned RS, Residential Suburban 1 June 20, Z-13131, D-n Review Board Staff Report for APEllis View Page 3 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development a. x <; , ;• z ' '�. r�' t y*nTTt�•�MnulT Vicinity Map from Growth Policy Figure 3-1 I June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for the Ellis View Page 4 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development t � - rTTI I I ':_ ��1 IIII ; TFT Parks and Open Space Vicinity Map June 20, Z-13131, De gn Review Board Staff Report for tit& View Page S of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. These conditions are specific to the planned unit development. Additional conditions may apply to the subdivision of the property being processed concurrently with this planned unit development Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. The proffered park improvements shall be constructed as described in Plat Supplement section Q and the proposed park master plan Appendix I of the application; and in accordance with the City of Bozeman's park development standards unless a relaxation is approved. 2. The area of park as depicted on the subdivision plat shall not be reduced in size. 3. A section shall be included within the covenants to be recorded with the property which clearly identifies those provisions to which the City is a party and noting that those sections may not be revised without the City's consent. 4. A front yard minimum setback of 20 feet to the main fagade of the house and 25 feet to the vehicle entrance to the garage or other parking area shall be provided. 5. A side yard minimum setback of 8 feet shall be provided. 6. A rear yard minimum setback of 20 feet shall be provided. 7. The western boundary of lot 5 and the Good Medicine Way frontage of lots 1-4 shall be considered as fronting on a linear park for the purposes of fence height limits_ 8. Lot coverage for each lot in the Ellis View Estates shall not exceed 25% of the total area of the lot. 9. A public access easement shall be provided for those portions of the Good Medicine Way trail which lie outside of the existing public right of way. CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAN CORRECTIONS None have been identified at this time. June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for Aiellis View Page 6 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development RECOMMENDA TION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Project Name: Ellis View Estates planned unit development preliminary plan File: Z-13131 Having considered the criteria established for residential planned unit developments approval with conditions is recommended to the Design Review Board(DRB). The DRB shall forward its recommendation to the City Commission for consideration and action. The tentative date for City Commission consideration and action is August 12, 2013. This date has not yet been finalized. The Planning Board will conduct a public hearing on the related subdivision and make a recommendation to the City Commission. Tentative hearing date for the Planning Board is July 16, 2013. Tentative hearing date for the City Commission is August 12, 2014. These dates have not yet been finalized. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will hold two additional meetings on June 26, 2013 and July 3, 2013 to consider the planned unit development and subdivision. If the DRC finds that the application is sufficient for review they will make a recommendation to the Planning Board and City Commission on both the planned unit development and subdivision. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board subdivision review committee will consider the proposed park master plan and park dedication. Their recommendation will be provided to the City Commission and Planning Board prior to their public hearings. No date has been scheduled for this review at this time. June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for the Ellis View Page 7 of 23 ` 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development STAFF ANALYSIS Applicable Plan Review Criteria, Section 38.19.100, BMC. The site is not within an overlay district and does not have any applicable special use review criteria unique to the project. All planned unit developments are subject to the conditional use review criteria and the planned unit development review criteria in addition to the regular site plan criteria. Review of the related subdivision will occur under application P-13019. Staff has not identified various code provisions that are currently unmet by this application. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code,which are applicable to this project, prior to receiving final plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy This development proposal for residential infill development is in conformance with the Bozeman Community Plan. Figure 3-1 of the growth policy designates the property as Suburban Residential indicating that there is a semi-rural configuration in the surrounding property. The land use designation is described on page 3-11 of the growth policy and in Appendix B of this report. The property has been annexed prior to development as recommended. The property is zoned Residential Suburban which is an implementing district for the Suburban Residential land use designation as shown in growth policy appendix C. The property has the correct designation on the future land use map and no inconsistencies with goals, objectives, or policies have been identified at this time. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations The final plan for the PUD shall comply with the standards identified in the BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. There are no known violations of municipal ordinance currently occurring on the site. The Residential Suburban district does not have a required minimum density. The subdivision review is also subject to Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. The applicant has requested eight relaxations from various standards applicable to.the project. Seven of the eight are related to the transportation network and are outside of the purview of the DRB. The eighth is addressed under criterion 8, Open Space. i June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for the Ellis View Page 8 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations No known non-conforming circumstances with non-municipal code provisions have been identified. The final plan will be reviewed to ensure compliance with this section. The applicant will require appropriate permits to cross the watercourse with a sewer line. Such permits will be required to be in hand prior to beginning any work. The plans for future homes will be evaluated against the requirements of the International Building Code at the time application is made for a building permit. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property The proposed design provides for buffers to adjacent uses, open spaces are placed adjacent to existing open spaces on neighboring properties. The proposed landscaping is appropriate in scale and character. The trail network connects to and continues to existing trail segments and provide new safe pedestrian routes outside of the driving area of Good Medicine Way. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions Not applicable to the DRB. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress Not applicable to the DRB. 7. Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings, the appearance of vehicular use, open space, and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation The proposed landscaping palette and design appears to conform to the requirements of Article 38.26, Landscaping. A total of 15 performance points is required and 15 are shown as having been provided. See the landscaping plan contained within Appendix I of the application for details. The applicants are proposing to use native species where appropriate. 8. Open space The UDC requires certain superior performance from PUDs above and beyond that required for regular site plans. One option is to provide extra on-site open space, (separate from the dedicated parkland requirement). This is discussed under the PUD performance criteria below. The applicant has requested a relaxation to not provide 100% frontage around the entire dedicated park perimeter. Per Section 38.27.060 the City may consider less than 100%frontage under certain conditions. The proposed park is being placed adjacent to existing publicly accessible open space which has pedestrian access provided by an existing trail and which connects to open space which is bounded by a street; therefore a street is not required to be located on the southern boundary. The eastern side of the park has a proposed trail extension to connect to a nearby existing trail. Additional property is provided with the park dedication. An area of 11,761 square feet of minimum area of park is required. An area of 18,184 is provided. , June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for the Ellis View page 9 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development The avoided street frontage on the east would have provided parking for four vehicles which would require approximately 1,450 square feet of paving for access and parking stalls. The development has provided an additional 4,973 square feet of park area over and above the minimum required. Therefore, additional park area has been provided and direct pedestrian access is provided. The additional 4,993 square feet meets the intent of providing constructed improvements and the request for the relaxation is therefore consistent with the intent of Section 38.27.060 and staff supports the grant of the relaxation. 9. Building location and height The proposed PUD does not include specific building designs. No relaxation is requested from the base height regulations of 38.08.060, BMC. 10. Setbacks Section 38.08.050.13 establishes the setbacks for the RS, Residential Suburban district. As noted, the setbacks for all newly created lots in the RS district are established through the PUD process. The preliminary PUD proposes setbacks of front yard 20 feet, side yard 5 feet and rear yard 20 feet. These are very slightly larger than the setbacks normally found in the R-1 district which would allow a 15 foot front yard setback along Ellis View Loop. The proposed setbacks are considerably smaller than those established for previously existing lots in the RS district of 35 front and 25 for side and rear yards. The RS district is often placed in areas with environmental constraints. In the circumstances of this application the environmental features, the watercourse, are protected by being placed within common open spaces and not within individual lots. There are no other environmental restrictions on the property. The adjacent properties are developed on a range of lot sizes with the more recent lots in Sundance Springs being smaller with a larger percentage of common open spaces rather than lower density individual lots. A balance must be found between the City's goals to encourage density on municipal service and the need to respect the character of the adjacent development. An open space or park area has been provided on all the exterior perimeter of the development. This provides some separation and the open areas are proposed to be landscaped. The overall proposed density is slightly higher than adjacent Sundance Springs but is consistent with the RS expectations. A balance between the local circumstances, previous development, and the various aspirations and standards of the City may be achieved with minor adjustments to the proposed setbacks. An additional setback for the garage vehicle entry will encourage a greater quality of street character by emphasizing the main home facade. A garage setback of 25 feet is achievable and provides a 5 foot incentive to bring the main facade of the home forward giving it more visual prominence. A slightly wider side yard setback of 8 feet will provide some assurance of a more open character which is consistent with the large amounts of open space and larger setbacks for the existing homes; while not unduly restricting the design flexibility of the i I I June 20, Z-13131, D!Rn Review Board Staff Report for tMe Ellis View Page 10 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development proposed lots which vary between 10,152 and 16,883 square feet. With the total of 16 feet of sideyard setback the narrowest proposed lot, Lot 4 which is wedge shaped, would still have an accessible frontage of forty feet. 11. Lighting New lighting is proposed to conform to municipal standards. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities Not applicable to the DRB. 13. Site surface drainage The calculations are not applicable to the DRB. The design of the pond in open space 2 and associated landscaping appears to conform to applicable standards. 14. Loading and unloading areas No formal loading and unloading areas are required with the proposed residential project. 15. Grading Relatively minor grading of the site is anticipated with this application in order to accommodate new stormwater drainage provisions. 16. Signage No signage is requested as part of this application. Any future subdivision identification sign will require a sign permit. No certificate of appropriateness is required. 17. Screening A code provision requires all mechanical equipment be properly screened with physical/opaque screening and/or be integrated into the building. The covenants proposed address this issue. 18. Overlay district provisions Not applicable 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties As of the writing of this report, no public comment has been received. Formal notice has not yet been given. Any received comments will be provided to the City Commission. June 20, Z-13131, Degn Review Board Staff Report for thelis View Page 11 of 23 . 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title,whether the lots are either: Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming or The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Not applicable. 21. Compliance with article 8 of chapter 10 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Not applicable. 22. Phasing of development No phasing is proposed. Applicable Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria, Section 38.19.100, BMC E. In addition to the review criteria of section 38.19.100, the review authority shall, in approving a conditional use permit, determine favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use, and all yards, spaces,walls and fences, parking, loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity; The proposed open spaces, landscape plan, park, and fence restrictions proposed in the covenants along with the larger setbacks proposed as conditions of approval address these issues. Project uses are open space/park which is adjacent to existing open space; and residences. The lots are of a size adequate to allow reasonable construction. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof, No material adverse effects have been identified. The development of the site will generate additional traffic and demand for utilities but the additional service demands are within capability to provide service. On-site open space and park land has been provided to meet demand by new residents and to provide buffers to adjacent properties. Conditions have been proposed to establish setbacks and lot coverage appropriate to the development. With these conditions the residential use is acceptable on the site. June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for AteEllis View Page 12 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development 3.That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b. Special yards, spaces and buffers; c. Special fences, solid fences and walls; d. Surfacing of parking areas; e. Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g. Regulation of signs; h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise,vibrations and odors; j. Regulation of hours for certain activities; k. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; 1. Duration of use; in. Requiring the dedication of access rights; and n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner. Most of these issues are addressed through the companion subdivision review of application P- 13019. As proposed the design does not appear to require extraordinary conditions except as have been identified under other criteria. To avoid repetition please see those sections. F. In addition to all other conditions, the following general requirements apply to every conditional use permit granted: 1. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure; and 2. That all of the conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the county clerk and recorder's office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. The necessary recording of documents will be addressed as part of the final site plan process and will be required prior to approval of the final site plan. June 20, Z-13131, Descgn Review Board Staff Report for Aiellis View Page 13 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Applicable Planned Unit Development Review Criteria, Section 38.20.090.E, BMC 2. In addition to the criteria for all site plan and conditional use reviews, the following criteria will be used in evaluating all planned unit development applications. a. All development. All land uses within a proposed planned unit development shall be reviewed against, and comply with, the applicable objectives and criteria of the mandatory "all development" group. (1) Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply, trails/walks/bike ways, sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? All required private utilities are provided for with utility easements. A private street is proposed as allowed by Article 38.24. The future owners association will be responsible for maintaining the private street. The proposed cross section includes services for pedestrians. Extension of public utilities is proposed for water and sewer. Storm drainage will be addressed privately per the City's standards. The design standards will be applied by the Engineering Division and Parks Division before any work begins. Detailed review will occur through the subdivision review process. Proposed trails appear to be in logical locations and continue the existing character. An access easement is needed for portions of the Good Medicine Way trail. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? No significant natural vegetation exists on the site which is covered in grasses. The proposed landscaping plan identifies revegetation procedures for disturbed areas which will remain as open space. (3) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes, the design layout and private design covenants provides a cohesive set of standards. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g., building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The proposed extensions of the trail system will facilitate travel by walking and bicycling which reduces overall energy use. Location as an infill development reduces total travel distances. The building code will apply energy efficiency standards at the time of building construction. June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for tMeEllis View Page 14 o f 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Yes, the open space placement helps provide for privacy. (6) Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by section 38.27.020. The required parkland is provided. (7) Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. The project meets the required performance standard by providing option(b) Additional open space. An area of 31,882 is required to provide private open space. An area of 38,362 has been provided. More than the minimum area of public parkland has also been provided. Collectively the park and open space is 3 1% of the net project area. (8) Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The pedestrian system and open spaces integrate into adjacent development. Significant public comment was received during the annexation of this project from adjacent residents asking that the new development not connect to Good Medicine Way. The proposed design respects that public comment. The use of the site is for residential uses and open space which is consistent in character of use with adjoining development b. Residential. Planned unit developments in residential areas (R-S, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, RMH and R-O zoning districts) may include a variety of housing types designed to enhance the natural environmental, conserve energy, recognize, and to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods, with provisions for a mix of limited commercial development. For purposes of this section, "limited commercial development" means uses listed in the 13-1 neighborhood service district(article 10 of this chapter), within the parameters set forth below. All uses within the PUD must be sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood. The permitted number of residential dwelling units shall be determined by the provision of and proximity to public services and subject to the following limitations: (1) On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project(calculated for residential portion of the site only) consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? Yes, the Suburban Residential land use designation describes a preexisting pattern of lots being two acres or less. The proposed development has lots of less than two acres in size. Generally, June 20, Z-13131, Descgn Review Board Staff Report for Aiellis View Page 15 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development the growth policy encourages infill development at densities respectful to but higher than may be currently in place. (2) Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g., private yards, patios and balconies, etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun,ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Private yards are provided. (3) Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? Public park is provided and connections to the extensive existing trail system in the area. (4) If the project is proposing a residential density bonus as described below, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? No density bonus is requested. (5) Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? Yes, the density of the project provides for less energy use and more efficient public services by shortening travel distances and length of required utility extensions. The existing watercourse on the site is protected and enhanced with landscaping. (6) Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus (30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district within which the project is located and which is set forth in article 8 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards (such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhood development? The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus shall be determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation shall be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to chapter 10, article 8, shall be excluded in the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated. No bonus is requested. (7) Limited commercial. If limited commercial development, as defined above, is proposed within the project, is less than 20 percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? No limited commercial is proposed. June 20, - , On Review Board Staff Report th for 011is e ,. Z13131 D ViwPage 16 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development (8) Does the overall PUD recognize and, to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? Yes, the PUD is a lower density development on larger lots which is the existing character. The pattern is similar to the adjacent Sundance Springs development which is also within the City limits and zoned as Residential Suburban. The adjacent development to the north and east is not annexed and must be on substantially larger lots to provide onsite water and sewer treatment. It is expected that these county parcels will annex and redevelop to a higher density over time but will be unlikely to meet the typical city densities due to slopes, watercourses, and similar site constraints. June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for Aiellis View Page 17 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development APPENDIX A ADVISORY CODE CITATIONS The following code provisions are identified for informational purposes as the project moves forward. These will need to be addressed as part of the final site plan application or other process step. a. Section 38.20.060 requires the applicant to submit a final plan within 12 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. The director will set the required number of copies. This is the final step in the site zoning entitlement process. An application form and fee is required in addition to the final plan set submittal. b. Section 38.28.060.A.3 requires a sign permit to be obtained prior to establishing a subdivision identification sign or other permanent sign. C. Section 38.20.060 states that the project must be completed within two years of final approval, or said approval shall become null and void. Prior to the lapse of one year, the applicant may seek an extension of one additional year from the Community Development Director. For your information, Code requirement. d. Section 38.39.030 requires that the applicant shall provide for private improvements certification by the architect, landscape architect, engineer and other applicable professionals that all improvements including, but not limited to landscaping, ADA accessibility requirements, private infrastructure, or other requirement elements were installed in accordance with the approved site plan, plans and specifications. For your information. This will be required prior to occupancy following construction. e. All construction activities shall comply with section 38.39.020.A.2 of the Unified Development Code. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. f. A Storm Water Drainage/Treatment Grading Plan and Maintenance Plan for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan must demonstrate adequate site drainage (including sufficient spot elevations), storm water detention/retention basin details (including basin sizing and discharge calculations, and discharge structure details), storm water discharge destination, and a storm water maintenance plan. Post-development discharges leaving the site shall be limited to the pre-development discharge rate for each proposed drainage area. g. A Stormwater Management Permit (SMP) must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to final site plan approval. The SMP requires submittal of an application form, a June 20, Z-13131, Des�giz Review Board Staff Report for tlzlis View Page 18 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development stormwater management plan, and payment of fees in compliance with the city's stormwater management ordinance#1763. The SMP is independent of any other stormwater permitting required from the state of Montana and does not fulfill the requirement to obtain,a general permit for stormwater discharges associated with construction activity if required under state rules. I June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for tAllis View Page 19 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development APPENDIX B —PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned"R-S" (Residential Suburban District). The intent of the R-O District is " is to allow open space, resource protection and primarily single-household development in circumstances where environmental constraints limit the desirable density. All new subdivision and site plan developments in this district shall be subject to the provisions of article 20 of this chapter, pertaining to planned unit development, and shall be developed in compliance with the adopted city growth policy." Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as "Suburban Residential" in the Bozeman Community Plan. The Plan indicates that"This category indicates locations generally outside of City limits, but within the planning area, where a land development pattern has already been set by rural subdivisions. Subdivisions in this area are generally characterized by lots two acres in size or less. It is probable that portions of this area may be proposed for annexation within the next twenty years. The area is able to be served with municipal water and sewer services with appropriate extensions of main lines. Any further development within this area should be clustered to preserve functional open space. Individual septic and well services are discouraged. If development is proposed within reasonable access distances to waste water and water services, annexation to the City should be completed prior to development." i June 20, Z-13131, Design Review Board Staff Report for tltllis View Page 20 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development APPENDIX C—NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Noticing has not yet been provided. Notice will be provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the City Commission public hearing. That hearing is tentatively scheduled for August 12, 2013. i • June 20, Z-13131, De ign Review Board Staff Report for tl*llis View Page 21 of 23 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development APPENDIX D REQUESTED RELAXATIONS Relaxations have been requested from the following sections. The majority are related to the street improvements required with the development and will be addressed with that application. A description is included in the Plat Supplements section of the application 1) Section 38.27.060.A Park Frontage—This relaxation is addressed under site plan criterion 8. 2) Section 38.24.090.D.3 Access 3) Section 38.24.050.A.1 Street right of way width and construction standards 4) Section 38.24.060.A Street Improvement Standards 5) Required all weather access to sewer manhole 6) Section 38.23.070.A.3 Municipal water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer systems 7) Section 38.24.010.A Streets 8) Section 38.24.080.A Sidewalks I I I 1 June 20, Z-13131, De ign Review Board Staff Report for tllollis View Page 2 • g 22 °f 3 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development APPENDIX E PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT Sec. 38.20.010. Intent. A. It is the intent of the city through the use of the planned unit development (PUD) concept, to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Specifically, with regard to the improvement and protection of the public health, safety and general welfare, it shall be the intent of this chapter to promote the city's pursuit of the following community objectives: 1. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the city is in accord with the city's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies; 2. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the city area; 3. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities; 4. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks; 5. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage, water quality and reduction of flood damage; 6. To encourage patterns of development which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality; 7. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation; 8. To reduce energy consumption and demand; 9. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography; 10. To improve the design, quality and character of new development; 11. To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas; 12. To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of incompatible developments; 13. To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office.end industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer,the neighborhood and the community as a whole; 14. To promote the efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options, and detailed and human-scale design; and I+ June 20, Z-13131, Deign Review Board Staff Report for tlzellis View 2013 Estates Preliminary Planned Unit Development Page 23 of 23 15. To meet the purposes established in section 38.01.040 i DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTED MEETING REVIEW SHEET Date: _6/26/2013_ Project Name: Ellis View Estates preliminary PUD plan Prepared by: Chris Saunders File #Z-13131 Owners/Applicants/Representatives Present: DRC Members Present: 6'-ob Murray, Project Engineer 9-1bhn Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent [I-Ton Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent e- 1�`' "Assist. Dir. Public Safety/Inspections rian Krueger, Development Review Manager ff5ob Risk, Chief Building Official B-Mom White, Parks Superintendent P<evin Handelin, Sanitation Superintendent ❑ _V Meeting Notes: - r&,cerr ( Z �fi lJlaLQ ��.1�1 Stu-�e�oreQ J/ I S �QAry? I .-,��.•K Set 9er 4 w�ci. U.- //C dr. C tr-.-, � / o. c�c� G I°fiy'r..�,fil✓� �c^c..'T7�J� �6..r..Y �` � . '�--r �x.S'ni�S � . .� �G � ra �•.� r G s f I"D G d d DRC of DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTED MEETING REVIEW SHEET Date: _8/28/2013_ Project Name: Ellis View Estates preliminary P'UD plan Prepared by: Chris Saunders File #Z-13131 Owners/Applicants�//Representatives Present: R.?/f- DRC Members Present: 34ob Murray, Project Engineer [I-Tbhn Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent ER-l'ohn vandelinder, Streets Superintendent ( ,Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager Cob Risk, Chief Building Official Q,Thom White, Parks Superintendent p,Kevin Handelin, Sanitation Superintendent Meeting Notes: 71 �e ^ �cc�'c� �n•-7 S-c,.....�r 4•Z�c fc , IVO 7v /arsi lJYT , 0 /•1✓4 f'C S�/`C Y'� /^��<+'..'T A���-�r � � . �,IFc►-s 4��✓- d-a,.;a hr-,1 S�J Y(;? ,2.s — -S4,cs� .✓�,2 L DRC of • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Preliminary Plat Applications (Development Review and Preliminary Plat) 2. Introduction 3. Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All.Subdivisions A. Adjoining Property Owners List and Certification B. Vicinity Map C. Reduced Plat Maps D. Statement of Requested Relaxation and Facts of Hardship E. Preliminary Platting Certificate 4. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements A. Surface Water B. Floodplains C. ' Groundwater D. Geology-Soils-Slopes E. Vegetation F. Wildlife G. Historical Features • H. Agriculture I. Agricultural Water User Facilities J. Water Supply K. Sanitary Sewer L. Storm Water Management M. Streets, Roads and Alleys N. Utilities O. Educational Facilities P. Land Use Q. Parks and Recreation Facilities R. Lighting plan S. Miscellaneous 5. Appendices A. Water/Groundwater Information B. Soils/Geology C. Storm Water Plan D. Traffic Impact Analysis E. Response.Letters F. Weed Management and Revegetation-Plan G. Covenants, Restrictions, and Articles of Incorporation of Homeowners Assoc. • H. Lighting Plan I. Park Plan • 6. PUD Preliminary Plan Information l. Application forms(PUD Preliminary Plan&Preliminary Site Plan) 2. List of applicant or owners of the PUD 3. Statement of planning objectives a. Land use policies and objectives b. Ownership C. Population d. Statement of compliance with Section 38.20.090 e. Land use conflicts f. Energy 4. Development Schedule 7. Reduced Site Plan/Supplemental Maps 8. Viewsheds 9. Street Cross Sections 10. Reduced Preliminary Plat,PUD Preliminary Plan and Maps • • • .. .� c c,� '� • • CITY OF BOZEMAN FEE APPLIES- DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIN EVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building C � OWE 406-582-2260 .. 20 East Olive Street D f 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 JUN p . 2gypnn bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 bozeman.net DEPARTMENT OF.PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLI C MMUNITYDEVELOPMENT 1. Name of Project/Development: Ellis View Estates—Preliminary Plat/PUD Preliminary Plan 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Mahar Montana Homes E-mail Address: joe@maharhomesmt.com Mailing Address: 1627 W. Main Street,#370, Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone: 585-5519 FAX: 585-8614 3.Applicant Information: Name: same as property owner E-mail Address: Mailing Address: hone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: C&H Engineering&Surveying,Inc. E-mail Address: gsteckler@chengineers.com Mailing Address: 1091 Stoneridge Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone: 587-1115 FAX: 587-9768 5. Legal Description: Lot 4A,Minor Subdivision No. 35C 6. Street Address: 3601 Good Medicine Way 7. Project Description: Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application to create 9 lots from 1 existng lot&PUD Preliminary Plan Application 8. Zoning Designation(s): R-S 9. Current Land Use(s): vacant 10. Bozeman Community Plan Designation: Suburban Residential Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ 11. Gross Area: Acres: 5.010 Square Feet: 218,236 12.Net Area: Acres: 2.709 Square Feet: 117,999 13. Is the subject site within an urban renewal district? ❑ Yes,answer question 13a ® No,go to question 14 13a.Which urban renewal district? ❑Downtown ❑ Northeast(NURD) ❑ North 7'h Avenue � I 14. Is the subject site within an overlay district? ❑ Yes, answer question 14a ® No,go to question 15 14a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑ Entryway Corridor i I I 15.Will this application require a deviation(s)? ❑ Yes,list UDC section(s): ® No i 16.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑ O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan I ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ®P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B:Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑ Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan I ❑ C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑ D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application i ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ®T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat I j ❑F. Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat i ❑ G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K. Conditional Use Permit ❑ Z. Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA. Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB. Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑ Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate checklist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8'/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8'/z-by 14-inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used,they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are Wednesdays at 5:00 pm. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project.Further,I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representatives access.............................................. to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050,BMC). I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: j)/J Date: �G pplicant's 'Of Signature: lJ Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11/25/03;Amended 9/17/04,5/1/06;9/18/07,revised 11/14/11) Property Owner's Signature: —Vt, Date: (Z b Property Owner's Signature: Date: • • Page 3 (Development Review Application—Prepared'11/25/03;Amended 9/17/04,5/1/06;.9/18/07,revised 11/14/11) • • SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST •These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Subdivision Tvae. ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record with a Variance ❑ Second or Subsequent Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record [Major Subdivision B. Total Number of Lots. 9 C. Proposed Uses. Indicate the number of lots (or spaces subdivisions for rent or lease, or units for condominiums) for each of the following uses: Residential,single household Park/Recreation/Open Space Residential,multi household Manufactured Home Space Planned Unit Development Recreational Vehicle Space Condominium Unit Commercial Townhouse Industrial Other: D. Preliminary Plat Requirements. The preliminary plat submittal must include the following information. Please refer to • Section 38.41.040,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Preliminary Plat Requirements Yes No N/A 1. All information required with the pre-application plan, as outlined in Section 38.41.030 Rr ❑ ❑ (Subdivision Preapplication Plan),BMC 2. Name and location of the subdivision, scale, scale bar, north arrow, date of preparation, lots and El El blocks (designated by number), the dimensions and area of each lot, and the use of each lot, if other than for single family 3. All streets, roads, alleys, avenues, highways, and easements; the width of the right-of-way,grades, ❑ ❑ and curvature of each; existing and proposed road and street names; and proposed location of intersections for any subdivision requiring access to arterial or collector highways 4. The names of adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining certificates of survey ❑ ❑ 5. An approximate survey of the exterior boundaries of the platted tract with bearings,distances,and Ef ❑ ❑ curve data indicated outside of the boundary lines. When the plat is bounded by an irregular shoreline or a body of water, the bearings and distances of a closing meander traverse shall be given 6. The approximate location of all section corners or legal subdivision corners of sections pertinent to Er ❑ ❑ the subdivision boundary 7. If the improvements required are to be completed in phases after the final plat is filed,the a0proxi- ❑ ❑ mate area of each phase shall be shown on the plat 8. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope is under 10 percent;5-foot intervals if slope is between ❑ ❑ 10 and 15 percent;and 10-foot intervals if slope is 15 percent or greater 9. List of waivers granted from the requirements of Section 38.41.060 (Additional Subdivision ❑ ❑ Preliminary Plat Supplements),BMC during the preapplication process 10. Request for exemption from Montana Department of Environmental Quality Review as described ❑ ❑ in Section 38.41.040.11 (Request for Exemption from MDEQ Review),BMC • 11. All appropriate certificates(refer to Chapter 38.6,BMC) Ej ❑ ❑ Page 3 (Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist—Prepared 11/26/03;revised 9/20/04;revised 5/2/05;revised 7/24/Or7,'revised 11/14/11) 0 • E. Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions. The supplemental information shall include the following. Please refer to Section 38.41.050,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. • Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions Yes No N/A 1. A map showing all adjacent sections of land,subdivision,certificates of survey,streets and roads ❑ ❑ 2. Map of entire subdivision on either an 8'/2-inch x 11-inch,8'/2-inch x 14-inch,or 11-inch x 17-inch ❑ ❑ sheet 3. A written statement describing any requested subdivision variance(s) and the facts of hardship ❑ ❑ upon which the request is based. Refer to Chapter 38.35 (Variance, Deviation and Appeal Procedures),BMC 4. Covenants,Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation for the Property Owners'Association 120 ❑ I ❑ 5. Encroachment permits or a letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, ❑ ❑ easements,rights-of way or driveways intersect State,County,or City highways,streets or roads 6. A letter of approval or preliminary approval from the City of Bozeman where a zoning change is ❑ ❑ necessary 7. A draft of such other appropriate certificates ❑ ❑ 8. Provision for maintenance of all streets (including emergency access), parks, and other required Ef ❑ ❑ improvements if not dedicated to the public,or if private 9• Profile sheets for street grades greater than 5 percent ❑ ❑ 10. If an authorized representative signs on behalf of an owner of record,a copy of the authoaization ❑ ❑ shall be provided 12. A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District for ❑ ❑ control of noxious weeds 13. A preliminary platting certificate prepared by a Montana title company Er ❑ ❑ F. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements. The following list of preliminary plat application supplements shall also be provided for all subdivisions unless waived by the Development Review Committee during the pre- application process. The developer shall include documentation of any waivers granted by the City after the pre- application meeting or plan review. Please refer to Section 18.78.060,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements Yes No N/A Waived 1• Surface water Rr ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Floodplains ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Geology,soils and slope ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. 1 Vegetation 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Wildlife ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. Historical features ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Agriculture 2r ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Agriculture water user facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ 10. Water and sewer ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. Stormwater management ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Streets,roads and alleys ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. Utilities Rr r[E] ❑ ❑ 14. Educational facilities ❑ ❑ 15. Land use ❑ ❑16. Parks and recreation facilities ❑ ❑ 17. Neighborhood center plan [1 ❑ ❑ 18. Lighting plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 19. Affordable Housing ❑ ❑ ff ❑ • 20. Miscellaneous ❑ ❑ 20' ❑ 21. Stormwater Management Permit Application required ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 4 0 • G. By marking the checkbox below, the developer agrees to allow the Department of Planning & Community Development to send copies of correspondence to all parties listed on Page 1 of the Development Review Application • (Property Owner, Applicant and Representative). If the checkbox is not marked, correspondence will be sent to the APPLICANT ONLY! ❑ By marking this checkbox I agree to allow the Department of Planning & Community Development to send copies of correspondence to all parties listed on Page 1 of the Development Review Application. Applicant's Signature: /�I Date: 2 L 13 Applicant's Signature: Date: • • Page 5 r • � D v 'o a' • 3 N r� • i • 13 m 3 y 1 i • • • Introduction The proposed Subdivision is a 9-lot major subdivision located on a 5.01 acre parcel currently known as Lot 4A of Minor Subdivision No. 35C, located between South Third Avenue and Good Medicine Way, immediately north of Sundance Springs Subdivision. Lot 4A has received a recent approval for annexation into the City of Bozeman with a zoning designation of.R-S (Residential Suburban). The Bozeman Development Code requires all lots proposed within the R-S Zoning District with a size less than one acre to be developed as a Planned Unit Development(PUD). The 9 lots proposed with this subdivision will be developed as single family residential homes. The proposed lots will have an average size of 13,620 square feet. The development is intended to be of a similar character to the existing homes and lots in the adjoining Sun-lance Springs Subdivision. Parkland and Open Space is provided around the perimeter of the development to buffer the development from the adjoining County properties and to add usably space to the existing open space along the southern and eastern boundaries. The performance point requirement for this PUD will be met through the dedication of Open Space. Approximately 26% of the gross acreage of the proposed development will be dedicated as Parkland or Open Space. This subdivision is intended to meet the goals and ideals outlined in.the City's adopted growth • policy, the"2020 Community Plan" and the standards included in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • Page 1 of 11 Environmental Assessment 0 • Adjoining Property Owners • Lot 4A, Minor Subdvision No. 35C Bozeman, MT David&Ann Kraft Lot 3,Minor Subd 35A 3515 Good Medicine Way Bozeman,MT 59715 Thomas&Nancy Hildner Lot 2,Minor Subd 35A 3505 Good Medicine Way Bozeman,MT 59715 Goldenstein Limited Partnership S25,T2S, R5E,NE4 of E Line of RW Less RW(30989 7810 Goldenstein Lane Sq Ft)Sec 25 2S, 5E 71.33 Ac Bozeman MT 59715 Sarah Hall,Inter Vivos Trust Lot 2, Sundance Springs Subd Ph 1 A 101 Gibson Drive Bozeman MT 59718 Sundance Springs Residential OwnersAssoc Inc S25,T2S,R4E,Sundance Springs Sub Phs 1A& 1B, P.O. Box 933 Open Space 25 2S 5E 29.90 Ac Bozeman,MT 59771-0933 Karen Basile Rev Liv Tr Lot 23, Sundance Springs Subd Ph IA 3300 Graf Street Unit 45 Bozeman, MT 59715 James&Martha Muth Lot 24, Sundance Springs Subd Ph lA 467 Peace Pipe Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Ciretta&Leslie Green Lot 16,Bl 3,Sourdough Creek Properties 8B 3606 Good Medicine Way • Bozeman,MT 59715 Scott Spratt Lot 15,BI 3, Sourdough Creek Properties 8B 3604 Good Medicine Way Bozeman,MT 59715 Terry&Martha Lonner Lot 12,Bl 3,Sourdough Creek Properties 8B 3602 Good Medicine Way Bozeman,MT 59715 James&Rhet Booth Lot 1.3,Bl 3, Sourdough Creek Properties 8B 58 Trails End Road Bozeman,MT 59715 Kenneth&Lavern Jacobs,Trustees Lot 11,B1 3,Sourdough Creek Properties 8B 3504 Good Medicine Way Bozeman,MT 59715 CERTIFICATION OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS LIST I hereby certify that,to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners of record and each purchaser under contract for deed of property within 200 feet of the property located at Lot 4A, Minor Subdivison No. 35C, is a true and accurate list of names from the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder records and mailing addresses from the Gallatin County Assessor Records. I further understand that an.inaccurate list may delay review of the project. aw� 3' 3 • Signature ate G:\c&h\l 1\11489\ADJOINER.doc Vow LOT 4A, I VI/NOR SC1�®®V. NOe 350 VICINITY MAP LOCATED /N THE NE 114 OF SEC. 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ors orb ((yY tr s t� q C�'. p Ott ,� Utj W r���N jumu 'lf:� ,�' r f s111 IOt. i3'wr 31(. IC U��] ct1�- 94, r . ;. � 3Y� ,,( hUtL•�:1)1z 'Ll �g��7lrkr� , rill A :r$CSi u, ru { ems' �{ y� �•; `�,S^q—�7 •W ;w.���gt�I�1n�liY9r [7 IStl�ir�r1► ".� •�L' �.d' .+3• ry .i"y�+ *F. ,. 1 �4. : .1 t�+ fr /n ,_ru uct 1� I�4 gqC�jjOTC �7ItSw -".---5 1 ►�} .[ll►s �' r `�( a . � r rt a� -�'"'tTJ'' !'F h0 (,•.++ v t i' ;� �` � .•�..-"----: Q --, �G �� a!};a� ,w��)4Er fi,7 'y wi C,i liKil L w yl'' o iS a s ,_�r i.i:�-y.t 1tl: 4 FufiM eft 1�1 1 '1g /v y,�, t es G Iw. t.'t,e7 c,i Irr .i"+,.�R•^' V ni 11010(F2111) Q1 i..r (tal' r ':k;;. ,� , a� d q 61 `rc tag+ ���p Lb . '; j ,�_ .�d "�,, fi--� r !f y:r` �1r� �;��•,� act ,;.� r t� �o 6JU�i � 1�`,�( ✓ y. },�.' ; t t'Vic` t .:7 r 4 d i . IO1000 s :;.�� 's• it �• r �� :;='` ;'' 00 3004 Scale Ah Meters >.N r -� •'�'• � :, r i�� a '� +�[,� 1 y? a � Engineering and Surveying Inc. ,I 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 WWW.Chengineers.com•info®chenginsers.com A SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO FMMJF I IIARV FOL.A T 0W CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELL % VIEW ESTATES SUED/V/S/ON LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF RECORD BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35-A OWNER: MAHAR MONTANA HOMES LOCH TED IN THE NE 114, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA 0 1 i \ \ LOT 12 EXISTING ZONING: R-S(COUNTY) \ \ \ \ REARRANGEMENT OF SUBDIV. ' AREA TABULATION LOT 3 LOT AREA = 121,070 SO FT - 55% I nd. Gaston YPC \ NO. 8-B OF SOURDOUGH PARKLAND = 18,184 SO FT - 8% Fnd. Gaston YPC MINOR SUB NO. 35-A OPEN SPACE = 38,362 SO FT- 18% 10 Wide Utility Ea Easement \ CREEK PROPERTIES / PUBLIC STREETS = 40,634 SO FT - 19% r .._-.._..............___.._._._..__se \ TOTAL AREA = 218,250 SO FT PARKLAND REQUIRED = 11,761 SO FT """"' OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 24,214 SQ FT 69 6 `;;} — — — — — — — ` ....._..- .-.... . i - - - - - - - - — \.. � -f._- �o. 1 I � 93:75-89 40`00--=----- -.,OPEN---"PACE 2 / a2.6r / X \34.519 sq Ft OQ� / • / a�a \ / \ d S Q� // PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT YARD - 20 FEET N 8'' 8•w a'w SIDE YARD - 5 FEET i € to REAR YARDS - 20 FEET Z W , _.4 _a�4n_oo 12.5( LOT 1 DITCH Z i ` ...... = 10.152S4 Ft - Cn � \ V r �O V IJ �-L; 2.5' WIDE PUBLIC AC ESS °; ado° \ n2• � / lv �\�) ��l AND UTILITY EASEMENI PER \ } MINOR SUBDIVISION No 35A00 W ud UGXGAS/ SIGN O (� m M O LOT 2 v � \�\ � ' ,... .-_..Lq 10,497 Sq Ft ' I �1 F u �. LOT 9 ` L OT 8 0o s L\ N - 12,944 Sq Ft �� 12,784 Sq Ft () E p0 \ U N P E A �TE D I -u GU: E-' \ • W Y . . Q GOLDENSTEIN "' S a 501 60 / . ... / ~,:. ; : : i :I \ '`�� Set C& „ o.... / / ^ti. a,: :: 7 :: Rebor _ HRPa \\ \ 8 LIMITED :; •`I .z \� EX. ZONING.' R-S PARTNERSHIP I :t'; I i o' 90.18 09o'o0'Da' 126.75 090'00'00• a ' \ .\ \1j .OQ: L7I;o e ? LOT 3 }iv j�O+..a• �- `,13,758 Sq Ft !tow.)i.t. i (CITY) .._ TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CUL-DE-SAC'PER /' � i i0 ; . t•.j a """' - i< �- S � MINOR SUBDIVISION No. ! \✓ - `� yj, y5 \\ OPEN SPACE r ;+ M 358 ' a.6a BT32'30" o ,s M LOT 6 LOT 7 I I 4 \ �I o I rn 14,034 Sq Ft 18,883 Sq Ft '., t _ \ -y io j( : 17 I ;ED Q o ; - LOr� 4 !` �u \ 16,844 Sq Ft! \ i ,,. I I�Q,` •i, L=18.44.-.. L-26.24 e=5.59'10"... Scale In Feet �' 7 i5,:' tgi - --5380-894D'p 60 0 60 / , e=13'2T58" t awe a' > � h z3• I \\ R�_ e�w e.'ss'; j ���.• a-u�' e•^r+ ass�-ass s-- \ \�, L.0T 5! Scale In In Meters `I 350 3.eo 69 ao o_ F�€�SP- `E 12 ---� ?9 13,:174 Sq;Ft r'• !'J� PROPOSED TRAIL POST \ J ; a\' \ AND WASTE STATION 5. e ss` ass -i: L ROPOSED MALL PARK o ;' ; f 6 R-z6s° DELI VERY LOCATION-....... os !/ ss !•5<%% ..18.184 Sq Ft - - - - -� a � r +:: ip- 10 Wide Utility Easement - --PROPOSED \ fT e"s ,. ', �- N /;-V -f_..per Minor Subdivision No. 35 A ED 30' \ Oj ,, s 'i+ f SEWER EASEMENTi r — F ,:;-. r•L J _ 8 � s � Fn—d. R—PC-,No. 11 E- - - - - - - - - - - / r7 do Engineering and Surveying Inc. `+ 9 9 y 9 Fnd. Gaston YPC + d. Gaston YP 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman, MT 59718 / nd. RPC No. 3111 ES Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 OPEN SPACE .f ". " ` %= POINT OF BEGINNING www.chengineers.com•info9chengineers.com Sheet I Of J! �Q ^?' 6� de Trail #11489 • • • List of Requested Relaxations The following relaxations are requested as a part of this Planned Unit Development. Section 38.27.060.A(Frontage)—this section of the code requires "Park land, excluding linear trail corridors, shall have frontage along 100 percent of its perimeter on public or private streets or roads." The proposed parkland for this subdivision is located at the southwest corner of the subdivision at the intersection of South Third Avenue and the new proposed,roadway. The roadway frontage is approximately 50% of the park perimeter. The primary reason for this relaxation is due to the small size of this development. The parkland requirement for the 9 lots is 0.27 acres. It would be impossible to provide street frontage on 100% of a parkland this small while meeting the City's geometric design requirements. The southern boundary of the parkland is abutting the Open Space for Sundance Springs. There is a trail corridor along this abutting Open Space which will allow for convenient access to the parkland. Placement of the Parkland adjacent to the existing Open Space will make for a more usable space. Section 38.24.090.D.3.(Access)—this section of the code calls for a minimum of 330 feet of separation between access points onto a roadway designated as a collector. We have made every attempt to meet this requirement and have come up just short with a separation distance of 328 feet from back of curb to back of curb. The two foot shortage is due to a combination of the placement of existing power poles in the South 3`d Avenue • right-of-way and the geometric design requirement of the City. Section 38.24.050.A.1. (Street and road right-of-way width and construction standards)— the proposed road cross section for this project is different from the options identified in the Transportation Plan. We have proposed a 53' wide right-of.-way with a back of curb to back of curb width 31 feet, 5' wide boulevards and 5' wide sidewalks. Section 38.24.060.A. (Street improvement standards),—The proposed street through this subdivision has two horizontal curves with a centerline radius of 100 feet. The City design standards call for a minimum centerline radius of 150 feet for local streets. The smaller radius is proposed due to the limited space within the property and the desire of the adjoining property owners for no connections with Good Medicine Way. A 100 foot radius with 31 foot wide roadway still provides adequate room for maneuvering large trucks and emergency vehicles. The radii could be removed and replaced with bends but we feel that this project lays out better with curvilinear streets. Sewer Manhole all weather access—A relaxation is being requested to allow one off-site sanitary sewer manhole to be constructed in a location that is not provided with an all- weather access road. An 8-inch sanitary sewer stub was provided to the edge of the Peace Pipe Drive right-of-way with Sundance Springs Subdivision. The intent of this sewer stub was to provide service to Lot 4A. A 30-foot wide sanitary sewer easement was also provided from the sewer stub to this property. The sanitary sewer • easement runs along the common boundary between Lots 24 and 25 then enters the Sundance Springs Open Space where it changes alignment and heads west. A manhole will be required at the angle point in.the Sundance Springs Open. Space. In • order for an access road to be constructed to this manhole it would either need to be constructed through the Sundance Springs Open Space or it would need to be constructed within the easement in the landscaped corridor between two existing homes. An access road in either of these locations would have significant impact on the subdivision open space and the adjoining property owners. Section 38.23.070.A.3. (Municipal water, sanitary sewer and storm sewers sty—The City's sewer master plan calls for the eventual construction of a trunk sewer main in South 3`d Avenue. The trunk main would need to be extended from approximately Kagy Boulevard to this site. Comments received from the City Engineering Department during the pre-ap process request that the portion of this trunk main along the frontage of the frontage of this subdivision be installed with the infrastructure for this subdivision. It does not make sense to install a small portion of a trunk main that does not go anywhere and is so far from the ultimate connection point. The final elevation of the trunk main needs to be coordinated with existing and proposed infrastructure both above and below this property. If the trunk main were to be installed now the elevation would be a guess at what will be required with the final design. If that guess is incorrect the sewer main would need to be removed and re-installed with the trunk main infrastructure (possibly at the City's cost). The sewer line would sit unused and aging until the final trunk main is installed at some unknown time in the future. As an alternative to the construction of this portion of trunk sewer main the developer is willing to sign a waiver of right to protest • creation of an SID for the funding of the trunk main project. Section 38.24.010.A. (Streets)—The Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan identifies South 3rd Avenue as a collector roadway. The City Engineering Department. has asked for the construction of South 3`d Avenue to one half of a collector. standard, including curb, gutter and sidewalk, along the frontage of this subdivision. This would be the only section of South 3`d Avenue that is constructed to this standard with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The sidewalk would have no connectivity and the roadway would not match any other. sections of South 3`d Avenue. We feel that the reconstruction of South 3`d Avenue would be best completed as a coordinated project to provide a consistent road corridor. The existing roadway does not have level of service issues that need to be addressed at this time. The owner would prefer to sign a waiver of right to protest an SID for the coordinated improvement of South 3`d Avenue at a later date. Section 38.24.080.A. (Sidewalks)—To allow the construction of a gravel fines trail along the west side of Good Medicine Way. A concrete sidewalk would not be appropriate for this location due to the character of the existing roadway and surrounding properties. Good Medicine Way primarily services lots outside of City limits and is constructed to a paved county standard with no curbs or.sidewalks. The proposed gravel trail along the west side of the roadway will,provide connectivity to the existing gravel trail at the end of the cul-de-sac. • MONTANA TITLE AND ESCROW, INC. C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING INC. 1091 STONERIDGE DRIVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 June 05, 2013 Re: Your Reference No. Enclosed please find the Plat Certificate requested. Please review this report and in the event that you find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding this report,you may contact: Name: Montana Title and Escrow,Inc. Phone: 406-587-7702 Fax: 406-587-2891 Please refer to our Order No. 7001-12587 We believe in delivering quality products that meet your needs, and our goal is to provide the most efficient, reliable service in the industry. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you! Sincerely, MONTANA TITLE AND ESCROW, INC. Bozeman Title Operations, 1925 N. 22nd Avenue, Suite 102, Bozeman, MT 59718- (406) 587-7702 Fax(406)587-2891 PC.NAIL • T E MONTANA TI e & ESCROw A MOTHER LODE COMPANY Bozeman Title Operations, 1925 N. 22nd Avenue, Suite 102, Bozeman, MT 59718- (406) 587-7702 Fax(406) 587-2891 PLATTING CERTIFICATE Order No. 7001-12587 This Platting Certificate covers a tract of land to be known as ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION Record Owner: JOE MAHAR • Legal Description: BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35-C, LOCATED IN THE NE1/4, SECTION 25,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, P.M.M., ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. Subject to the following, as of May 24, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. SEE EXCEPTIONS ATTACHED Montana Title &Escrow Company, Inc., a Montana Corporation,hereby certifies that the foregoing Platting Certificate shows the name of the record owner of the subject real property, together with the present and proposed description of the property, and all encumbrances affecting the subject property, according to the office of the Clerk and Recorder of said county and state.The liability for this examination is limited to the fee paid for the same. Dated: May 24, 2013 Montana Title & Escrow Company, Inc. i • i ncnx.csar E Order No. 7001-12587 PLATTING CERTIFICATE EXCEPTIONS: 1. TAXES, SPECIAL AND GENERAL,ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AND SERVICE AREAS FOR THE YEAR 2012. PARCEL NO. RGG9391. 1ST INSTALLMENT: $846.51 PAID 2ND INSTALLMENT: $846.47 DUE AND PAYABLE AND WILL BE DELINQUENT IF NOT PAID ON OR BEFORE MAY 31, 2013 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ASSIGNMENT OF COUNTY'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY TAX LIEN, RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2013, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2439430, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 3. GENERAL TAXES FOR THE YEAR 2013, A LIEN IN THE PROCESS OF ASSESSMENT, NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE. 4. ALL RIGHTS,TITLES OR INTERESTS IN MINERALS OF ANY KIND, OIL, GAS, COAL OR OTHER HYDROCARBONS AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE RIGHT TO MINE OR REMOVE SUCH SUBSTANCES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS TO ENTER UPON AND USE THE SURFACE OF THE LAND FOR EXPLORATION, DRILLING OR EXTRACTION RELATED PURPOSES. (THIS COMMITMENT/POLICY DOES NOT PURPORT TO DISCLOSE DOCUMENTS OF RECORD PERTAINING TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED RIGHTS.) 5. ALL MATTERS AS DELINEATED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF "MINOR SUBDIVISION 35", ON FILE AND OF RECORD WITH THE GALLATIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. 6. ALL MATTERS AS DELINEATED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF "MINOR SUBDIVISION 35A", ON FILE AND OF RECORD WITH THE GALLATIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. 7. ALL MATTERS AS DELINEATED ON THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF "MINOR SUBDIVISION 35C", ON FILE AND OF RECORD WITH THE GALLATIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. 8. TERMS, PROVISIONS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS, PROVIDED IN THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, BUT OMITTING COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW,IN DOCUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1979, AS FILMBOOK 54, PAGE 523, OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS WERE MODIFIED IN PART BY PWT.CAAT.BYC Order No. 700142587 PLATTING CERTIFICATE EXCEPTIONS: INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 22, 2005, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2198748, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 9. AN EASEMENT OVER SAID LAND FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, AS GRANTED THE MONTANA POWER COMPANY, RECORDED NOVEMBER 06, 1944, AS FILMBOOK 90, PAGE 235, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 10. QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM VERA MCLEOD, ETAL, TO THE SOUR DOUGH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION, DATED APRIL 5, 1939, AND RECORDED APRIL 5, 1939, IN BOOK 82 OF DEEDS, PAGE 309, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, GRANTING ALL LINES, POLES, POWER AND POWER FIXTURES NOW AFFIXED OR PERTAINING TO NE1/4 OF SECTION 25,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST. 11. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CERTIFICATE OF SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL, RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 1979, AS FILMBOOK 54, PAGE 491, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 12. THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS AS CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT ENTITLED "MAHAR GOOD MEDICINE WAY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, AND MAHAR MONTANA HOMES, DATED OCTOBER 15, 2012, RECORDED DECEMBER 07, 2012, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2434280, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 13. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4415, RECORDED DECEMBER 07, 2012, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2434281, OFFICIAL RECORDS. *********************** END OF SCHEDULE B *********************** vwr.csnr.exc 0 • PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE Purpose Of This Notice Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of a persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document,which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of: AGTIC Title Insurance Company Placer Title Company American Guaranty Title Insurance Company Placer Title Insurance Agency of Utah Montana Title and Escrow Company Stewart Title Guaranty Company National Closing Solutions Stewart Title Insurance Company National Closing Solutions of Alabama, LLC Westcor Land Title Insurance Company North Idaho Title Insurance Company Wyoming Title and Escrow Company Old Republic National Title Insurance Company We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: * Information we receive from you, such as on applications or other forms. * Information about your transactions we secure from our files, of from our affiliates or others. * Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. * Information we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice,no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: * Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finances, securities and insurance. * Nonfinancial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. • PRIVACY (Rev. 3/2013) • 3 b m m N • ��- �� � � • r�� =a r,z f_ • Introduction Ellis View Estates Subdivision is a proposed 9-lot major subdivision located on a 5.01 acre parcel currently known as Lot 4A of Minor Subdivision No. 35C, located between South Third Avenue and Good Medicine Way, immediately north of Sundance Springs Subdivision. Lot 4A has received a recent approval for annexation into the City of Bozeman with a zoning designation of R-S (Residential Suburban). The Bozeman Development Code requires all lots proposed within the R-S Zoning District with a size less than one acre to be developed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The 9 lots proposed with this subdivision will be developed as single family residential homes. The proposed lots will have an average size of 13,620 square feet. The development is intended to be of a similar character to the existing homes and lots in the adjoining Sundance Springs Subdivision. Parkland and Open Space is provided around the perimeter of the development to buffer the development from the adjoining County properties and to add usable space to the existing open space along the southern and eastern boundaries. The performance point requirement for this PUD will be met through the dedication of Open Space. Approximately 26% of the gross acreage of the proposed development will be dedicated as Parkland or Open Space. This subdivision is intended to meet the goals and ideals outlined in the City's adopted growth • policy, the "2020 Community Plan" and the standards included in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • Page 1 of 10 Environmental Assessment • • • Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements A. Surface Water Refer to Appendix A of this report for copies of the USGS quad map, surface water map, and Flood Insurance Rate Map highlighting the location of the subject property and adjacent waterways. The only surface water found within the subdivision is an unnamed lateral of the Middle Creek Ditch which cuts diagonally through the extreme southeast corner of the property. The lateral branches from the larger channel at the intersection of South 3`d Avenue and Goldenstein Lane. The ditch runs northward from the intersection along the eastern edge of South 3`d Avenue. The ditch then changes course running northeast crossing under Little Horse Drive in a 26 5/8"x 43 3/4" culvert, then continuing through the Sundance Springs Subdivision Open Space to the southeast corner of the proposed subdivision. From the proposed subdivision, the ditch continues in a general northeastern direction where it discharges into "Matthew Bird Creek" which is ultimately a tributary to Bozeman Creek&the East Gallatin. The ultimate connectivity of this ditch to state waters deems this jurisdictional "Water of the U.S." . The Middle Creek Ditch lateral will not be modified with this proposed development. The ditch will remain on undeveloped "Open Space"with private lot lines setback a minimum of 50 feet from the north bank of the ditch. The setback will be landscaped to • the top of the ditch bank with grass. Currently there are two pedestrian bridges constructed over the ditch lateral where the Sundance Springs trail system makes crossings. The proposed trails for this subdivision will make connections with these existing trails in such a manner that additional bridges/crossing will not be required. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel No. 30031 C0818D, the entire site lies in Zone X, which is outside of the 500 year flood plain. A copy of the FIRM Panel is enclosed in Appendix A. The Bozeman Area Wetland Map prepared by the NRCS identifies wetlands along the alignment of the Middle Creek Ditch lateral. The ditch, in the vicinity of this project has steep well defined banks with a clear delineation between the wetlands at the bottom and the uplands at the top. The only impacts to this wetlands will the short term impact associated with crossing the ditch with the underground sanitary sewer main. Assuming an 8' wide construction trench the impacted area will be approximately 220 square feet (0.0051 acre). A 310 permit from the local conservation district and a 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be required for the impacts associated with this crossing. The permits will need to be obtained prior to any land disturbing construction activities. The native soils will need to be reused in the disturbed wetland areas and wetland vegetation will need to be re-established following the land disturbing activities. • Page 2 of 10 Environmental Assessment • B. Floodplains According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel No. 30031 C0818D,the entire site lies in Zone X, which is outside of the 500 year flood plain. A copy of the FIRM map is enclosed in Appendix A. C. Groundwater Groundwater levels on-site can be determined from well logs on the adjoining properties. Wells to the north and east have static water levels between 15' and 18'. Wells to the south have static water levels around 6'. There is approximately 10' of elevation difference between these sets of wells suggesting that the groundwater elevation is relatively consistent. The grade varies across this site with a high point near the center of the property. The existing data indicates that we should see groundwater depths from 1.2' to 16' on the majority of the site. The highest groundwater level will likely be found at the extreme southeast corner where we would anticipate depths close to 6'. This depth is just slightly below the flow line of the ditch lateral cutting through the corner of the property. Well data from all recorded wells in Section 25 are included in Appendix A. Static water levels within Section 25 are anywhere from 4' to 56' of depth. Central sewer and water are proposed for the project, minimizing potential ground water • degradation. Surface runoff will be controlled by channeling flows into retention basins which will limit discharges to pre-development rates. The basins will also filter sediments and oil reducing the potential for contamination of downstream aquifers. D. Geology-Soils-Slopes The Gallatin Valley is located in a high intermontane basin in southwestern Montana. Several maps of area,geology prepared by The U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological survey are included in Appendix B. The maps indicate that the site is located on quaternary aged tertiary strata composed predominately of alluvial fan deposits and/or sediment or sedimentary rock. Due to the relatively flat slopes found on site(<_2%) there is minimal exposure to geologic hazards such as rock or land falls or slides. As with all other areas of the Gallatin Valley, there is the possibility of earthquakes occurring in the area. The Valley is within Seismic Zone 3(Seismic zone 0 having the least earthquake potential, Zone 4 the greatest). Other than this standard earthquake hazard there are no geologic hazards to be associated with this property. NRCS soils data is included in Appendix B. The site is composed mainly of Blackmore • silt loam and Blossberg Loam. Reports are included on the physical properties and Page 3 of 10 Environmental Assessment • • • engineering indexes, soil limitations and hydric properties of these soil types. These soil types are considered fair for most types of construction. The limiting features for these soil types include the potential for shrink-swell and high ground water. As with all other construction projects within the valley, accepted engineering practices will be used to overcome the limitations. The following protective measures will be taken to ensure that the existing geology is not a problem: 1. All cut and fill.slopes shall be placed in uniform lifts compacted to 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698. 2. All topsoil, including organic material, will be removed from building and pavement areas. 3. Design of all streets and parking areas shall use accepted engineering practices to determine structural sections and the use of separation fabrics based on soil conditions and traffic loading. 4. Exterior building footings shall be placed at a minimum of 48 inches below grade, for frost protection. • 5. Buildings will be designed for seismic zone 3 as outlined in the International Building Code. Fills within the right-of-way will be primarily composed of imported fill material. Where cuts and fills are required outside of the right-of-way, material will generally be moved from cut areas to fill areas. The proposed roadways will generally follow the existing grade on this site. The largest fill areas will likely be located on the private lots at the southeast corner where the site steepens somewhat sloping to the south. The amount of fill is dependent on the type of home and foundation system. Generally the excess material generated from the foundation excavation can be utilized for fill on the private lots. The construction contract shall provide for landscaping, seeding, and fertilizing of all cut and fill slopes. Mulching or placement of erosion control mats shall be investigated for use as needed. The overall storm water master plan/erosion control plan required by MDEQ will detail all necessary erosion control measures. "Best Management Practices" will be utilized to minimize erosion and any down gradient impacts. The Covenants and Weed Control Plan shall include provisions to ensure that re-seeding and erosion control is provided as individual buildings are being constructed. • Page 4 of 10 Environmental Assessment • E. Vegetation The property is currently lightly vegetated with grasses and weeds. The only critical plant communities associated with this property consist of wetland grasses and vegetation adjacent to the unnamed later of the Middle Creek Ditch. These wetland areas will be contained within a 50'wide setback with development kept to a minimum. Where disturbance of wetlands are required(at road and utility crossings)the appropriate measures recommended by the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers, Gallatin Conservation District, and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks will be taken to minimize and correct impacts. 404 permits will be required for any disturbance of the jurisdictional wetland areas. A noxious weed plan has been prepared and approved by the Gallatin County Weed Board. The plan is intended to control the.spread of weeds associated with development. A seed plan for disturbed areas has been developed and included in the noxious weed plan. A copy of the approved Weed Management and Revegetation Plan is included in Appendix F. A more comprehensive revegetation plan has been prepared for the park and open space areas. The park concept plan and stream corridor plans are attached in Appendix I. • F. Wildlife There are no known endangered species or critical game ranges on site. Due to the history of agricultural use on and around the site, and the adjacent residential use, it provides little wildlife habitat. Wildlife species consist mainly of rodents and common birds. Little cover and shelter is available for wildlife species in the area although it is not unheard of for deer and other large game animals to pass through the area. The unnamed lateral of the Middle Creek Ditch and associated wetlands will be treated as environmentally sensitive areas. A 50' setback has been provided to the nearest lot line on the north side of the watercourse to ensure its protection. Negative impacts from surface water runoff will be reduced by retaining runoff in retention basins. A storm water discharge permit and erosion control plan will be required prior to the initiation of construction. Best management practices will be used to control erosion, sedimentation, and harmful materials during construction. G. Historical Features According to the Montana Historical Society, Historic Preservation Office there are no • Page 5 of 10 Environmental Assessment • previously recorded cultural properties located within the search locale. The response letter from the Montana Historical Society is enclosed in Appendix E. There is no evidence of historic homesteads or structures on the property. If, in the course of the proposed development any sites are uncovered,the State Historic Preservation Office will be notified. As long as no historic sites turn up during the course of construction the State Historic Preservation Office feels that a cultural resource inventory is unwarranted for this site. H. Agriculture There are no agricultural properties adjoining this subdivision. The nearest agricultural properties are located on the west side of South Third Avenue. Residential developments are encroaching into this area with development inevitable in this close proximity to the City of Bozeman. Due to the fractured ownership of the surrounding properties and encroaching development the site is no longer considered a viable farming unit. Covenants will include restrictions on the containment of family pets. Homeowners will be required to meet City of Bozeman pet licensing requirements and leash laws. • I. Agricultural Water User Facilities The unnamed lateral of the Middle Creek Ditch is the only ditch conveying water through the proposed subdivision to downstream water users. The ditch lateral will remain undisturbed with the exception of one area where the underground sewer will cross. Any alterations to the existing ditches will be done so that downstream water rights are not diminished or impaired in any way. J. Water Supply Water for domestic use and fire protection will be provided by connections to the City of Bozeman water system. 8-inch water mains will be looped through the subdivision connecting to existing main on the east side of South 3`d Avenue. The existing main in South 3`d Avenue is a 12-inch main and will need to be tapped at two locations and extended onto the property. Hydrants will be provided at intervals no greater than 500 feet throughout the subdivision as specified in the Uniform Fire Code. Water Usage is based on the following criteria: • Population Estimate =9 dwelling units x 2.11 persons per dwelling unit Page 6 of 10 Environmental Assessment • = 19 persons The overall annual average daily demand of 170 gallons per day(gpd)per person is suggested for all future development. The demand estimate includes: 1.) Fire flows, flat rate accounts, leakage, under registering meters and other unaccounted water usage such as street cleaning, hydrant and sewer flushing. 2.) Base flow water. 3.) Increases in summer usage including lawn and garden irrigation, non-commercial car washing, cleaning sidewalks, and other miscellaneous metered uses. Utilizing the 170 gpd per person, the predicted average daily water demand for Ellis View Estates Subdivision is 3,230 gpd. This property being at the upper end of the City's distribution system and perched at the top of a hill will see some of the lowest pressure in the City. To ensure that adequate pressure and flow is available the City of Bozeman Water Department recently performed updated hydrant flow tests to assist in the analysis of the proposed water system. The proposed system has been modeled using this updated data and preliminary analysis indicates that pressure and available fire flow is adequate to meet City of Bozeman, • MDEQ and Uniform Fire Code requirements. Final approval of water connections will be obtained through the normal approval process of the preliminary plat, design report, and construction plans. Approval will also be required from MDEQ. K. Sanitary Sewer Ellis View Estates Subdivision will require connection to the City of Bozeman's existing sewage collection system. The nearest existing sewer is found approximately 390 feet south of this property in Peace Pipe Drive. An 8-inch stub was provided to the edge of the Peace Pipe Drive right of way and a 30 foot wide easement was provided for the purpose of servicing this property. A full analysis of downstream sewer mains has been completed and it has been determined that there is capacity to service this property. Sewage will be conveyed to and treated at the City of Bozeman's Wastewater Treatment Plant located at Moss Bridge and Springhill Road. Using an average daily flow rate of 89-gallons per capita per day for the estimated population of 19 persons gives us an average daily flow of 1,691 gallons per day. The peaking factor for a population of 19 people is calculated to be 4.51. This equates to a peak flow rate of 7,626 gallons per day. We must also factor in an infiltration rate of 150-gallons/acre/day or 752 gallons per day. Adding these numbers together gives us a total anticipated peak flow rate of 8,378 gallons per day. Using Manning's equation, an • Page 7 of 10 Environmental Assessment • • • 8-inch sewer main flowing full at 0.40% slope can carry 809,779 gallons per day. At peak flow an 8-inch sewer main inside the subdivision would flow at 1% of capacity. L. Storm Water Management Storm water runoff from Ellis View Estates Subdivision will be conveyed to a retention pond within Open Space 42 at the northeast corner of the site. This storm water retention facility will filter sediment and oils from the storm water before infiltrating into the ground. An Overall Grading/Drainage Plan is enclosed in Appendix C highlighting the locations of the retention pond and the pathway the storm water will take to reach it. The All storm water conveyance structures(swales, pipes, curbs, etc.) will be sized to handle a 25-year storm event. The retention pond will be sized to handle a 10-year storm event. Preliminary calculations for sizing storm water structures are enclosed in Appendix C. More detailed calculations will be provided in the design report required for city and MDEQ approval. M. Streets, Roads, and Alleys • Access to the site will be provided from two locations on South 3`d Avenue. The two approaches will be separated by 328 feet(from back of curb to back of curb)along South 3`d Avenue. A relaxation is being requested to not require the construction of South 3`d Avenue along the frontage of this subdivision to a collector standard. The reasoning behind this request is that this would provide one isolated 470 foot section of roadway constructed to an alternative cross section than the remainder of the roadway. It would make the most sense for the expansion of South Third Avenue to occur in one coordinated project. The developer is willing to sign a waiver of right to protest the creation of an SID for the future upgrade to South Third Avenue. Ellis View Loop will be constructed to local street standards with a width of 31' fi•om back of curb to back of curb, 5' wide boulevards and 5' wide concrete sidewalks. This cross section will be constructed within a 53' wide right-of-way. A relaxation is being requested with this project to allow for a right-of-way width less than 60 feet(the standard right-of-way width for local streets within the City of Bozeman). Road maintenance for all streets will be provided by the City of Bozeman after the improvements have been accepted by the City. On site runoff will be treated with a retention facility constructed at the northeast corner of the property. Erosion and siltation control will be exercised during construction by using the appropriate best management practices as outlined in"Montana Sediment and Erosion Control • Page 8 of 10 Environmental Assessment • • Manual"(May 1993)prepared by the MDEQ Water Quality Bureau. • Traffic rsubdivision a een re ared and i enclosed in A Tr is Impact Study for the has b prepared s os Appendix D. The Traffic Impact Study indicates that the surrounding roadways are adequately designed to handle the traffic generated by this subdivision. A north-south linear trail will be constructed adjacent to the tributary of Baxter Creek and through the parkland at the western edge of the subdivision. The trail corridor through the subdivision will provide an important pedestrian route to Valley Unit Park to the south and the 100 acre Gallatin County Regional Park to the north. N. Utilities Letters requesting comments on their ability to service this subdivision have been sent to the following service providers: U.S. Postal Service,NorthWestern Energy, Optimum, Centurylink, Yellowstone Pipeline Co., American Medical Response, Bozeman Deaconess Hospital, Bozeman Public School District, Streamline Transportation and A21ied Waste Services. • Response letters from all of those who chose to comment are enclosed in Appendix E. O. Educational Facilities A written statement from Kevin R. Barre, Director of Facilities, Bozeman Public Schools is enclosed in Appendix E. The response letter indicates that proposed development will be in the Morning Star Elementary School, Sacajawea Middle School and Bozeman High School attendance area. Morning Star Elementary School is currently at capacity but this will likely change with the current construction of Elementary School #8. The existing school bus system can accommodate the estimated number of additional students. P. Land Use Ellis View Estates Subdivision is proposed as a 9 lot major subdivision. The property was recently annexed with a zoning designation of R-S (Residential-Suburban). The development is proposed to contain 9 single family residential lots with areas between 10,152 and 16,884 square feet. As required, for all developments in the R-S district with individual lots less than 1 acre,the subdivision is being developed as a planned unit development (PUD). The development is intended to be of a similar character to the existing homes and lots in the adjoining Sundance Springs Subdivision. Parkland and • Page 9 of 10 Environmental Assessment • Open Space is provided around the perimeter of the development to buffer the development from the adjoining County properties and to add usable space to the existing open space along the southern and eastern boundaries. The performance point requirement for this PUD will be met through the dedication of Open Space. j Approximately 26% of the gross acreage of the proposed development will be dedicated as Parkland or Open Space. Q. Parks and Recreation Facilities All parkland requirements for the subdivision will be met with the dedication of parkland j adjacent to Ellis View Loop at the south end of the subdivision. The parkland requirement for the nine lots in this subdivision.is 0.27 acres. 0.4175 acres of parkland is proposed for dedication with this subdivision. The proposed park area has been sited adjacent to the existing Sundance Springs Open Space to provide a larger, more usable park space. A new Type 2 gravel trail will be constructed from Ellis View Loop through the parkland to the existing trail system in the Sundance Springs Open Space. A kiosk with garbage can and baggie dispenser will be located at the start of the trail adjacent to Ellis View Loop. Open Space tracts will also be provided around the perimeter of the subdivision. Open • Spaces will be landscaped with mounds, grass,trees and shrubbery. The intent of the open space is to set back the lots and buildable spaces and to provide a separation from the adjoining properties that are on slightly larger acreage. An irrigation system,to be maintained by the Homeowners' Association, will be installed in the open space areas. A type 2 gravel trail will also be constructed through the open space adjacent to Good Medicine Way along the eastern boundary of the subdivision. This trail will provide connectivity with the existing trail that joins the Good Medicine Way cul-de-sac to the Sundance Springs trail system. 0.5559 acres of open space is required to meet the 20 PUD performance points. 0.8807 acres of open space is proposed with this subdivision. R. Miscellaneous The only construction hazards near the development are the existing power, gas, electric, and phone lines found at the perimeter of the subdivision. The utilities have been located and are shown on the site plan and utility plans. The location of these utilities will be considered in the design of all underground utilities. The construction plans will require the contractor to have all underground utilities located prior to the initiation of construction. There are no known public nuisances on or around the subject property. • Environmental Assessment Page 10 of 10 .. • , ' ' � , . D i� r-,; �s � � . � a x. • D 4 � 1 . • e ' f � � � � � APPENDIX A • WATER/GROUNDWATER INFORMATION • • • LU F ^ a oo nsurance y repo or Is duns I Ion. O cc Rx t7 anal 1 79 < c, ;:; ,. Vie.H; ;3'ei+r ice is available in this community, contact your insurance 4985 ' A e,r'I d Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. 01 CD ir PRINCETON PLACE �98614982* LIMIT OF DETAILED STUDY a —� 5.�90 IUAD Cf_AI F 111_ Snn° Z ,. ., i 4990 L ?_..` t 150 300m 'f � o h9g5 r; m PANEL 0818D t CK, t o P _ 4999 FIRM o f: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP N 5000 PIPE t>� . GALLATIN COUNTY, °RIVE MONTANA Q�P Sp04 AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 818 OF 1725 • (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUM@ER PANEL SUFFIX JGAW1nN COUNTY 300027 0818 D BOMMAN,CITY OF 3000M 0818 D m G/TT�E � r sO I 9d, o 6 < e �O w m Notice to User: 77to Mep Number shown below should be used when pbciq map orders:the Community Number shown QX0241 X / q0 5025 �' .sp�� PG V above should ee used on uw,ranoe spocations for Ina wm;ect GOLDENSTE "h z 5029 Y MAP NUMBER " "� 5 30 ZFF b 30031CO818D �Q F EFFECTIVE DATE se� SEPTEMBER 2,2011 r ZONE AE ' � '�' � Federal Emergency Management Agency This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It FARM ACCESS 5040 was extracted using F-Mrr On-Line. This map does not reflect changes Footbrid a or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the g title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance !;`� Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov BAXTER DITCH LOWER MIDDLE CREEK Aakjer Creek MAYNARD-BORDER DITCH SUPPLY DITCH Baxter Greek (FARMERS CANAL) BECK-BORDER DITCH McDonald or FARMERS CANAL Spring Creek Wylie Creek SPRING DITCH SLOUGH DITCH y (FARMERS CANAL) �N.P.R.R. (MANLEY) WEST LAKE DITCH East Dry Creek .I LEGEND y [] FARMERS CANAL CO. I t J ii 3` , i I ( ^ I • © HOY DITCH CO. MIDDLE GREEK DITCH CO. . C 1 , _,._ ..1,a J.�—_ - --'-�• r_ _ — • NEST GALLATIN CANAL CO. 1 r (KL'EINSCHMIDT) C100ClOc = PRIVATE IRRIGATION I 1 � Middle ore Hyllte Creek j I / ; �000 aD oar �- I �00013 0f-3= OZEAIAN 000000= i WILLMORE`r •• MYRON FERRIS DITCH ��DITCH -7 • I ' 1!i•K�0 MIDDLE CREEK DITCH L7tltJ OC3= (LATERAL) 1 \I I I Ji • COLLETT DITCH f__-C.M.ST.P.8 P.R.R. (BRANCH) Dry Creek C.M.ST.P. &P.R.R. \ { It (BRANCH) FPWLER _• •1 �. )I .I SCHOOL I ♦ 1 i HOFFMAN DITCH 1 J 1 \' FARMERS CANAL ( / POND � 1 ,� /Bird Springs Creek • f I / HOFFMAN-TODD DITCH - O P .- • B 26 • �-- - ENO OF LEVERICH LATERAL MARSHALL DITCH - - -t- (MYSTIC LAKE DITCH) MYSTIC LAKE DITCH (LATERALS) ! r =- 33 1 t t MAIN OR"66° DITCH T.2S-R.4E p\ f 1 _POND T.3S-R. 4E �- - _ - �I '------ i I . II LEVERICH LATERAL KLEINSCHMIDT CANAL Ir `H 1 OY DITCH (MYSTIC LAKE DITCH) GOOCH-GANT DITCH HANSEN DITCH MYSTIC LAKE DITCH Z2S-R.5E Ory Creek MIDDLE CREEK DITCH TESELLE DITCH Middle or JOHNSON-PASHA DITCH Hyalite Creek 37 Montana's Ground-Water Inf mation Center (GWIC) I Geographic V.11.2013 Page 1 of 3 Groundwater Information Center You are currently signed in.1 1/31/2013 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Sian Out • Montana Tech of The University of Montana 1300 West Park Street-Natural Resources Building Room 329 Butte Montana 59701-8997 Ph:(406)496-4336 Fx:(408)496-4343 I Home I Well Data I Reports I Data Coco 1 DrillerWeb I DNRC 1 Helal 1 Menus:I Main I SWL I GWCP I P-miects I Coal I Geothermal I GWIC Data>Well Construction Data>Township:02S Range:05E Sec:25 The following data were returned from the GWIC databases for the area you requested.For a more detailed description of the data view the GWIC Metadata report.If you notice data entry errors or have questions please let us know by clicking here to leave us a message.If you wish to view a one page report for a particular site, click the hyperlinked Gwic Id for that well.Scroll to the right of your screen to view all the data.All data displayed on the screen may not show up when printed. Retrieval Statistics' Did you know about... Field Max Min Avg Other GWIC data Total Depth(ft) 160.00 12.00 59.93 GWIC has 3 field visit(s)for this request area. Static Water Level(ft) 56.00 0.00 12.98 GWIC has 3 water level(s)for this request area. Yield(gpm) 500.00 12.00 36.66 Thanks,Just take me back to the menu. 'These statistics do not take any geographic,topographic.,or geologic ether MBMG data factors into consideration.Negative swl values are reported for water levels that are above land surface. MBMG has 383 publications available for GALLATIN county. MBMG has 3 abandoned mine record(s)for this request area. Gwic Id PDF DNRC WR Site Name Twn Rng Sec Q Sac Ver? Type Td Swi Pwl Rwl Yield Test Data Use 120132 BRUSH JAMES 02S 05E 25 No WELL 46.00 21.00 25.00 PUMP 10/5/1907 DOMESTIC 104176 BRUSH JAMES W 02S 05E 25, No WELL 46.00 15.00 22.00 20.00 BAILER 4/18/1978 DOMESTIC 96032 jp KELLY JOHN R 02S 05E 25 No WELL 62.00 8.00 13.00 20.00 PUMP 5/30/1918 DOMESTIC 129208 MATZINGER TIM 02S 05E 25 No WELL 50.00 10.00 50.00 60.00 PUMP 1218/19:1 DOMESTIC PAUL 8 PATRICIA ANN • 96034 SITZ FRIEDA 02S 05E 25 No WELL 32.00 32.00 15.00 OTHER 8/28/1958 DOMESTIC 96033 ' STRAND ELDIN 02S 05E 25 No WELL 43.00 8.50 43.00 20.00 PUMP 5/26/1973 DOMESTIC 120133 STRAND ELDON 02S 05E 25 No WELL 48.00 11.00 28.00 15.00 BAILER 9/15/1973 DOMESTIC 96036 13992 FINCH CLARK AND 02S 05E 25 A No WELL 63.00 16.00 56.50 18.00 PUMP 12/29/1973 DOMESTIC CAROL 212016 ALBRIGHT JENNY 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 100.00 37.00 37.00 25.00 AIR 6/23/200- DOMESTIC AND ERIC 221677 CAMPBELL 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 82.00 16.00 16.00 20.00 AIR 9/14200E DOMESTIC MICHAEL OR KRISTIN 225879 CAPE,DON JR.& 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 133.00 50.00 50.00 25.00 AIR 523/2006 IRRIGATION SHAVON 133437 LAY 84061 DORK DORIS AND 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 57.00 17.00 27.00 20.00 OTHER 6/30/1972 DOMESTIC SLUGHER NAN 209562 GRANARD,DENNIS 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 135.00 35.00 35.00 25.00 AIR 4172004 IRRIGATION 8 CATHY 138798 89609 HILDNER TOM 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 02.00 15.00 50.00 20.00 AIR 9/30/1992 DOMESTIC 214368 LINT DAN R CHRIS 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 160.00 56.00 56.00 22.00 AIR 9/15/2004 IRRIGATION 96037 'M 5086 LONNER TERRY 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 50.00 18.00 40.00 25.00 PUMP 10/26/1973 DOMESTIC AND MARTHA 212699 MUTH MARTHA 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 58.00 6.00 6.00 20.00 AIR 62/2004 IRRIGATION 123994 VTZINGER BOB 02S 05E 25 AA No WELL 115.00 33.00 100.00 25.00 AIR 7/2/1991 DOMESTIC 96038 8641 PERRY DAVID A 02S 05E 25 AAA No WELL 72.00 14.00 20.00 PUMP 10/6/1975 DOMESTIC i 214854 BECKER,JIM 02S 05E 25 AABA No WELL 40.00 12.00 12.00 40.00 AIR 9/9/2004 IRRIGATION 252235 DAINES CLAIR 02S 05E 25 AABA No WELL 38.00 11.50 20.00 AIR 8/19/2009 IRRIGATION 196279 ' C30002748 WESTFIELD SOUTH 02S 05E 25 AABC No WELL 100.00 21.00 35.00 AIR 413QI2002 IRRIGATION PHASE III HOME OWNERS • 172171 NELSON BUD& 02S 05E 25 AAC No WELL 80.00 16.00 70.00 16.00 30,00 AIR 2/19/1999 DOMESTIC JESSIE 89081 BOLANDER CARL 02S 05E 25 AC No WELL 18.00 5.00 5.00- 25.00 AIR 5/2/2001 'RRIGATION htti)://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/sqlservei-/vl 1/data/dataGeographic.asp?pagename=&report=.... 1/31/2013 Montana's Ground-Water Infi ation Center(GWIC) I Geographic V.11.2013 Page 2 of 3 190851 C116474-00 MOONEY ED 02S 05E 25 AC No WELL 58.00 5.00 5.00 12.00 AIR 5/2/2001 IRRIGATION • 176558 110095 SUNDANCE 02S 05E 25 AC No WELL 40.00 12.00 12.00 20.00 AIR 9/13/1999 IRRIGATION SPRINGS/CLINTON POTTER 211074 BLACK,SHAWN& 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 36.00 7.00 7.00 30.00 AIR 6/3/2004 IRRIGATION MARY 226210 BUCKLEY, 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 56.00 7.00 7.00 25.00 AIR 5/24/2006 IRRIGATION GERALD/SWANSON, ELISABETH 192028 C117087.00 GERRY HENRY 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 40.00 16.00 16.00 35.00 AIR 7/2/2001 DOMESTIC 168676 HALL GREG 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 40.00 6.00 35.00 60.00 AIR 5/10/1998 DOMESTIC 192029 LEWENDAL ANDERS 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 82.00 19.00 19.00 20.00 AIR 3/2 112 0 0 1 IRRIGATION 192030 C30011672 LEWENDALANDERS 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 82.00 22.00 22.00 20.00 AIR 6/22/2001 IRRIGATION 197031 C30003023 LINDEMEIER RALPH 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 38.00 6.00 6.00 20.00 AIR U26/2002 IRRIGATION OR GLORIA 188870 '� MORSE JOHN 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 54.50 6.00 6.00 30.00 AIR &222001 DOMESTIC 216737 NEELY CARL 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 90.00 18.00 18.00 35.00 AIR 1 2/812 00 4 IRRIGATION 204766 dM NIXON SUSIE 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 79.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 AIR 5232003 IRRIGATION 188873 OLSON RON 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 40.00 6.00 20.00 AIR 5/362001 DOMESTIC 204609 PAHREJD 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 63.00 5.00 5.00 20.00 AIR 6/172003 IRRIGATION 192033 C11719500 SHROYER KEVIN 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 76.00 22.00 22.00 20.00 AIR 10.2/2001 DOMESTIC 192034 WEED SUSAN 02S 05E 25 AD No WELL 50.00 8.00 8.00 30.00 AIR 6/19/2001 IRRIGATION 96039 1261 MCCROODEN 02S 05E 25 ADC No WELL 41.00 13.00 30.00 20.00 BAILER 10511973 DOMESTIC HOWARD 198671 C30003743 SMITH TERRENCE 02S 05E 25 ADCA No WELL 36.00 7.50 7.50 20.00 AIR 8/16/2002 IRRIGATION M 196280 C30002366 EGGLOFF WERNER 02S 05E 25 ADCD No WELL 40.00 7.60 40.00 AIR 412J2002 IRRIGATION • 194972 C30003045 GOUVEIA PHIL 02S 05E 25 ADCD No WELL 41.00 7.60 7.60 50.00 AIR 3/l/2002 IRRIGATION 96040 71503 EDSALL WAYNE 02S 05E 25 BC No WELL 150.00 0.00 89.00 70.00 PUMP 5112:1989 DOMESTIC 241939 C30041626 EAGLE MOUNT- 02S 05E 25 BDDA Yes WELL 136.00 5.00 5.00 60.00 PUMP 11/92007 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY BOZEMAN 241940 C30041625 EAGLE MOUNT- 02S 05E 25 BDDA Yes WELL 136.00 7.00 8.00 60.00 PUMP 11/14/2007 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY BOZEMAN 96041 C073098-00 EAGLE MOUNT 02S 05E 25 BDOD Yes WELL 40.00 5.00 30.00 25.00 AIR 629/-989 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY 96042 60871 BUKVICK ROBERT 02S 05E 25 C No WELL 40.00 8.00 35.00 60.00 AIR 3/5/1586 DOMESTIC LEI 96044 HARRISA.P. 02S 05E 25 C No WELL 32.00 26.00 22.00 500.00 PUMP 1/1/1888 DOMESTIC 96043 HARRISA.P. 02S 05E 25 C No WELL 12.00 6.00 3.00 PUMP 1/11IB72 DOMESTIC. 187067 C115554.00 ELLIOTFRANK& 02S 05E 25 CA No WELL 30.00 4.00 4.00 25.00 AIR 10/31/2000 DOMESTIC JEANNE 133299 85084 ELLIOTT FRANK 02S 05E 25 CA No WELL 130.00 10.00 120.00 30.00 AIR 6117/1S95 DOMESTIC ANDJOANN 211947 ® QUINN,BILL 02S 05E 25 CA No WELL 60.00 10.00 10.00 25.00 AIR 7/9/2004 DOMESTIC 187068 f& ELLIOTJANIS 02S 05E 25 CB No WELL 30.00 4.00 4.00 30.00 AIR 10/31/2000 DOMESTIC 121831 Im 75654 ELLIOTT JANIS 02S 05E 25 CB No WELL 40.00 6.00 30.00 30.00 AIR 6/20/1990 DOMESTIC 96045 COBAT BLAINE 02S 05E 25 CBB No WELL 30.00 5.00 10.00 30.00 BAILER 7/21/19E7 DOMESTIC 96046 59712 STAKER RAY 02S 05E 25 CCB No WELL 42.00 9.00 35.00 30.00 AIR 52011985 DOMESTIC 96047 61535 DIRCKX BRADLEY 02S 05E 25 CCD No WELL 61.00 11.00 57.00 25.00 AIR 5/l/1986 DOMESTIC 96048 BRAUN BOB 02S 05E 25 CD No WELL 47.00 5.00 27.00 25.00 BAILER 10/3/1970 DOMESTIC 176559 SMITH SCOTT 02S 05E .25 CO No WELL 60.00 6.00 6.00 50.00 AIR 621/1999 DOMESTIC 176560 '® C112445-00 BRAUN BOB 02S 05E 25 COD No WELL 60.00 6.00 6.00 20.00 AIR 6/25/1999 DOMESTIC • 12828. SOURDOUGH VOL 02S 05E 25 COD No WELL 59.00 6.00 33.00 50.00 PUMP 9/l/1974 DOMESTIC FIRE DEPT 164315 BRAUN BOB AND 02S 05E 25 D No WELL 24.00 10.00 12.00 OTHER 6/l/1960 IRRIGATION HAZEL 96053 BRAUN BOB AND 02S 05E 25 D No WELL 31.50 10.00 12.00 OTHER 9/2/1958 DOMESTIC http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/sqlserver/vl 1/data/dataGeographic.asp?pagenatne=&report=.... 1/31/2013 Montana's Ground-Water In�mation Center(GWIC) I Geographic V.11.2013 Page 3 of 3 HAZEL • 96054 BUSCH LARRY 02S 05E 25 D No WELL 25.00 8.00 10.00 80.00 PUMP 7127/1963 DOMESTIC 96052 NICKEY LOUISE 02S 05E 25 D No WELL 12.00 6.00 30.00 OTHER 4/10960 DOMESTIC 96050 NORDLING BARTON 02S 05E 25 D No WELL 35.00 15.00 40.00 OTHER 1/1/1957 DOMESTIC 96049 SITZ FRIEDA M 02S 05E 25 D No WELL 25.00 8.00 23.00 30.00 PUMP 7/31/1963 DOMESTIC. 96055 GOLDENSTEIN 02S 05E 25 DB No WELL 45.00 10.00 10.00 60.00 PUMP 6/1/`956 DOMESTIC JOHN AND ETTA 96056 WALTON GARY 02S 05E 25 DC No WELL 90.00 16.00 80.00 30.00 AIR 5/8/1990 DOMESTIC End of Report. 71 record(s)listed. Items of Note: 1This report is restricted to site types of WELL,BOREHOLE,SPRING,COAL BED METHANE WELL,PETWELL,PIEZOMETER. 2A single well record(a distinct GV4C Id)may be represented by more than one line in this report if more than one performance test was conducted on the well at the time of drilling. Explanation of Columns: GWIC Id=Key field for the GWIC database.Links to one page reports. PDF=Are scanned documents available through the Document Manager? ■ =Yes,click on the icon to download the PDF file. ■ =No,well was submitted electronically.No paper record exists. • O=No,record does have a known well log but it is not scanned yet. ■ =No,record may or may not have a document to scan.Metsdata is unclear. • ®=No,record was created from a source other than a well log.No paper record exists. DNRC WR=Water right number assigned to this site by Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. Site Name=Current owner name assigned to GWIC record. Location=Location of site in Montana township,range,section,and quarter-section coordinates. Ver?=Has this location been verified by field staff? Type=Type of site assigned to GWIC record. Td=Total depth of well in feet below ground. Swl=Static water level in feel above/below ground-Negative values are reported for water levels that are above land surface. Pwl=Pumping water level in feet below ground. • Rwl=Recovery water level in feet below ground. Yield=Yield in gallons per minute. Test=Type of performance test reported. Date=Completion date of well/borehole. Use=Reported use of water. Disclaimer: The preceding materials represent the contents of the GWIC databases at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology at the time and dale of the retrieval The information is considered unpublished and is subject to correction and review on a daily basis.The Bureau warrants the accurate transmission of the data to the original end user at the time and date of the retrieval.Retransmission of the data to other users is discouraged and the Bureau claims no responsibility if the material is retransmitted.Thera may be wells in the request area that are not recorded at the Information Center. pGround Water Information Center Online©1998-2013 Staff I Privacy Statement • http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/sqlserver/vl 1/data/dataGeographic.asp?pagename=&report=..: 1/31/2013 • I • i A • r D 'o -a • � a X. W • APPENDIX B SOILS/GEOLOGY Amll� P(ej(Alqckry C—Al�qjc:MP-h JN4h-?, 63ZeMkA 'ROW w • Boa ®� � o aoaa000aooao®o®®a000aooaoaa�oa :1 7R 14 all Lq At VN /12 i N w w A Q 1 N A 5053760 5053780 5053800 5053820 5053840 5053860 5053880 5053900 5053920 A • 111°2'50' 111°2'S0" g oz D Z O N I C cD of C'fD y� j 0 O O N o � IJ A ai 9' c wo m 0 o a a D w w N N N X a a g g O Z = w � o � d w � o 0 41 p T a c) om H o o mm 0 Q N N CD y— (D W Z a a N < N< 0'� O O (D D U1 y N C p) m O O a a S g N (n O p S O 0) O O 111°2'38" $� _ 0 111°2'38" 505 760 5053780 5053800 5051820 5053840 5053860 5053880 5053900 5053920 • W W � N W W Ce QD N A p Soil Map-Gallatin County Area,Montana (Ellis View Estates) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(AOI) (Z Very Stony Spot Map Scale:1:1,250 if printed on A size(8.5'X 11")sheet. 0 Area of Interest(AOI) Wet Spot The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Soils AL Other (--I Soil Map Units Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Special Point Features Special Line Features.;.� Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Blowout te Gully misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line 1 Short Steep Slope placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting • ® Borrow Pit `2 Other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. X Clay Spot ' Political Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map Closed Depression 0 Cities measurements. X Gravel Pit Water Features Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Gravelly Spot Streams and Canals Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 12N NAD83 ® Landfill Transportation This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of Rails fy Lava Flow the version date(s)listed below. Marsh or swamp Interstate Highways Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area,Montana 5` Mine or Quarry US Routes Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18,2012 Miscellaneous Water Major Roads Date(s)aerial images were photographed: 8/27/2005 ti Perennial Water Local Roads The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were p _-�--s compiled and digitized probably differs from the background v Rock outcrop imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting -(- Saline Spot of map unit boundaries may be evident. Sandy Spot • Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 �� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map-Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Map Unit Legend Gallatin County.Area;Montana(MT622) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in-AOI Percent of AO1 350B Blackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes 4.5 91.6% 542A Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes 0.4 8.4% Totals for Area of Interest 4.9 100.0% • • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Surrey 2/1/2013 Aim— Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Map Unit Description The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions in this report, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas.A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils.Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently,every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in particular map unit description.Other minor components,however,have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They • generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each.A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned,however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. USDA• Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 '� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 I Map Unit Description—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make u a soil series.All t i p p e he soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.Soils of a given series can differ in texture of the surface layer,slope, stoniness,salinity,degree of erosion,and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas.Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar.Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion • of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform.An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas,or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Additional information about the map units described in this report is available in other soil reports,which give properties of the soils and the limitations,capabilities, and potentials for many uses. Also, the narratives that accompany the soil reports define some of the properties included in the map unit descriptions. Report—Map Unit Description Gallatin County Area, Montana 35013-13lackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation:4,850 to 5,550 feet Mean annual precipitation: 18 to 22 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 43 degrees F Frost-free period: 80 to 95 days Map Unit Composition • Blackmore and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5 0 • Map Unit Description-Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Description of Blackmore Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous loess Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 4 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 30 percent Available water capacity: High (about 11.4 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification:All areas are prime farmland Land capability classification(irrigated):4e Land capability(nonirrigated):4e • Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Silty (Si)20"+ p.z. (R043BS323MT) Typical profile 0 to 10 inches: Silt loam 10 to 27 inches: Silty clay loam 27 to 42 inches: Silt loam 42 to 60 inches: Silt loam Minor Components. Bowery Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landfomv Alluvial fans, stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Silty(Si) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS355MT) Blackmore Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site:Silty (Si)20"+ p.z. (R043BS323MT) Brodyk Percent of map unit:2 percent Landform: Stream terraces. Down-slope shape: Linear • Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Limy (Ly) 15-19 p.z. (R044XS357MT) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Surrey 2/1/2013 �iiiiiw Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Map Unit Description—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • 542A—Blossberg loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation:4,200 to 5,550.feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period:90 to 110 days Map Unit Composition Blossberg and similar soils;85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Blossberg Setting Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material:Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained • Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:About 12 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline(0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/ cm) Available water capacity: Low(about 5.5 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Land capability(nonirrigated):5w Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D Ecological site:Wet Meadow(WM) 15-19"p.z. (R044XS365MT) Typical profile 0 to 15 inches: Loam 15 to 24 inches: Sandy clay loam 24 to 60 inches: Extremely gravelly loamy coarse sand Minor Components Bonebasin Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform:Terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear • Ecological site: Wet Meadow(WM) 15-19"p.z. (R044XS365MT) USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 arlm Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Surrey Page 4 of 5 • 0 Map Unit Description—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Meadowcreek Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: Subirrigated (Sb) 15-19" p.z. (R044XS359MT) Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 • USDA • Natural Resources Web Soil Survey' 2/1/2013 ® Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 0 0 Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings Soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site,the design of the structure,construction, performance after construction, and maintenance.This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect dwellings and small commercial buildings. The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect building site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has. one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1.00)and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). • Dwellings are single-family houses of three stories or less. For dwellings without basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration,whichever is deeper. For dwellings with basements, the foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of about 7 feet. The ratings for dwellings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs.The properties that affect the load-supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential), and compressibility. Compressibility is inferred from the Unified classification. The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. Small commercial buildings are structures that are less than three stories high and do not have basements. The foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration, whichever is deeper. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs.The properties that affect the load-supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, subsidence, linear extensibility(shrink-swell potential), and compressibility(which is inferred from the Unified classification).The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include flooding, depth to a water table, ponding, slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a • cemented pan, and the amount and size of rock fragments. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 r • Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction. The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report—Dwellings and Small Commercial Buildings [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site.The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Dwellings and Small Commercial'Buildings—Gallatin County Area,Montana • Map symbol and soil :Pct.of:.Dwellingswithout basements Dwellings with;basements Small commercial buildings name map unit , Rating class and Value Rating class and Value Rating°class and: Value limiting,features limiting features limiting features 350B—Blackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore 90 Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Somewhat limited Shrink-swell 0.50 Shrink-swell 0.50 Shrink-swell 0.50 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 85 Somewhat limited Very limited Somewhat limited Depth to saturated 0.98 Depth to saturated 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.98 zone zone zone Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 a,= Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 • Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Gallatin Ellis View Estates County Area,Montana Roads and Streets, .Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping Soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site,the design of the structure,construction, performance after construction, and maintenance.This table shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect local roads and streets, shallow excavations, and lawns and landscaping. The ratings in the table are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect buildi-Ig site development. Not limited indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected. Somewhat limited indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. Very limited indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings in the table indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0.01 to 1.00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1.00)and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation • (0.00). Local roads and streets have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year.They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material;a base of gravel, crushed rock, or soil material stabilized by lime or cement; and a surface of flexible. material(asphalt), rigid material(concrete), or gravel with a binder.The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic-supporting capacity. The properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading are depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to a water table, ponding, flooding, the amount of large stones,and slope.The properties that affect the traffic-supporting capacity are soil strength (as inferred from the AASHTO group index number), subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential), the potential for frost action, depth to a water table, and ponding. Shallow excavations are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for graves, utility lines, open ditches, or other purposes. The ratings are based on the soil properties that influence the ease of digging and the resistance to sloughing. Depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan,the amount of large stones, and dense layers influence the ease of digging,filling, and compacting. Depth to the seasonal high water table, flooding, and ponding may restrict the period when excavations can be made. Slope influences the ease of using machinery. Soil texture, depth to the water table, and linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential) influence the resistance to sloughing. • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 i i Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping—Gallatin Ellis View Estates County Area,Montana • Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained. Irrigation is not considered in the ratings. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability after vegetation is established.The properties that affect plant growth are reaction; depth to a water table; ponding;depth to bedrock or a cemented pan;the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches; the content of salts, sodium, or calcium carbonate; and sulfidic materials. The properties that affect trafficability are flooding,depth to a water table,ponding,slope,stoniness,and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer. Information in this table is intended for land use planning,for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction. The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. • Report—Roads and Streets, Shallow Excavations, and Lawns and Landscaping [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site.The numbers in the value columns range from 0.01 to 1.00. The larger the value, the greater the potential limitation. The table shows only the top five limitations for any given soil. The soil may have additional limitations] Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and:Landscaping-Gallatin.County Area,Montana. Map symbol and soil Pet.of Local roads and streets Shallow.excavations Lawns and landscaping• name map unit Rating class and` Value Rating class,and, Value Rating class and. .: Value: limiting features limiting features limiting features 3506-13lackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore 90 Very limited Somewhat limited Not limited Frost action 1.00 Unstable excavation 0.10 walls Low strength 1.00 Shrink-swell 0.50 • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 211111& Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 0 9 Roads and Streets,Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and Landscaping-Gallatin Ellis View Estates County Area,Montana • Roads and Streets,;Shallow Excavations,and Lawns and:Landscaping-Gallatin%County-Area,MontanaM. Moo:symbol'and soil'_Pet.ofJ Local,roads and streets Shallow.excavations, Lawns and landscaping name map.. unit '' Rating class,and Value Rating,class and Value Rating class and Value- limiting features limiting features Jimiting,features 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 85 Very limited Very limited Somewhat limited Frost action 1.00 Depth to saturated 1.00 Depth to saturated 0.75 zone zone Depth to saturated 0.75 Unstable excavation 1.00 zone walls Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 • i I i I I I i i i • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 i Source of Reclamation Material,Roadfill,and Topsoil—Gallatin County Area, Ellis View Estates Montana Source of Reclamation Material, Roadfill, and Topsoil This table gives information about the soils as potential sources of reclamation material, roadfill, and topsoil. Normal compaction, minor processing, and other standard construction practices are assumed. The soils are rated good, fair, or poor as potential sources of reclamation material, roadfill, and topsoil. The features that limit the soils as sources of these materials are specified in the table. Numerical ratings between 0.00 and 0.99 are given after the specified features. These numbers indicate the degree to which the features limit the soils as sources of topsoil, reclamation material, or roadfill. The lower the number, the greater the limitation. Reclamation material is used in areas that have been drastically disturbed by surface mining or similar activities. When these areas are reclaimed, layers of soil material or unconsolidated geological material, or both, are replaced in a vertical sequence. The reconstructed soil favors plant growth. The ratings in the table do not apply to quarries and other mined areas that require an offsite source of reconstruction material. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect erosion and stability of the surface and the productive potential of the reconstructed soil. These properties include the content of sodium, salts, and calcium carbonate- reaction; available water capacity; erodibility; texture; content of rock fragments; and content of organic matter and other features that affect fertility. Roadfill is soil material that is excavated in one place and used in road • embankments in another place. In this table, the soils are rated as a source of roadfill for low embankments, generally less than 6 feet high and less exacting in design than higher embankments. The ratings are for the whole soil,from the surface to a depth of about 5 feet. It is assumed that soil layers will be mixed when the soil material is excavated and spread. The ratings are based on the amount of suitable material and on soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and the performance of the material after it is in place, The thickness of the suitable material is a major consideration. The ease of excavation is affected by large stones, depth to a water table,and slope. How well the soil performs in place after it has been compacted and drained is determined by its strength (as inferred from the AASHTO classification of the soil) and linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential). Topsoil is used to cover an area so that vegetation can be established and maintained. The upper 40 inches of a soil is evaluated for use as.topsoil.Also evaluated is the reclamation potential of the borrow area.The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth; the ease of excavating, loading, and spreading the material; and reclamation of the borrow area. Toxic substances, soil reaction, and the properties that are inferred from soil texture, such as available water capacity and fertility, affect plant growth. The ease of excavating, loading, and spreading is affected by rock fragments, slope, depth"to a water table, soil texture, and thickness of suitable material. Reclamation of the borrow area is affected by slope, depth to a water table, rock fragments, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, and toxic material. The surface layer of most soils is generally preferred for topsoil because of its organic matter content. Organic matter greatly increases the absorption and • retention of moisture and nutrients for plant growth. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National,Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Source of Reclamation Material,Roadfill,and Topsoil—Gallatin County Area, Ellis View Estates Montana • I, Information in this table is intended for land use planning, for evaluating land use alternatives, and for planning site investigations prior to design and construction,. The information, however, has limitations. For example, estimates and other data generally apply only to that part of the soil between the surface and a depth of 5 to 7 feet. Because of the map scale, small areas of different soils may be included within the mapped areas of a specific soil. The information is not site specific and does not eliminate the need for onsite investigation of the soils or for testing and analysis by personnel experienced in the design and construction of engineering works. Government ordinances and regulations that restrict certain land uses or impose. specific design criteria were not considered in preparing the information in this table. Local ordinances and regulations should be considered in planning, in site selection, and in design. Report—Source of Reclamation Material, Roadfill, and Topsoil [Onsite investigation may be needed to validate the interpretations in this table and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site.The numbers in the value columns range from 0.00 to 0.99. The smaller the value, the greater the limitation] Source of Reclamation Material;,Roadfill;and,Topsoil-:Gallatin°County Area;Montana 'Map symbol and soil Pct of Potential as a source of Potential as a source;of Potential as.a source of name map reclametiori material. roadfill topsoil' unit , • Rating class and -Value. Rating class,and .. Value., Rating class and Value limiting features limiting jeatures:• limiting features 3506-13lackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore 90 Fair Fair Fair Water erosion 0.68 Low strength 0.78 Too clayey 0.93 Carbonate content 0.80 Shrink-swell 0.87 Low content of organic 0.88 matter Too clayey 0.98 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 85 Fair Fair Poor Too sandy 0.01 Wetness 0.14 Hard to reclaim(rock 0.00 fragments) Low content of organic 0.12 Cobble content 0.94 Rock fragments 0.00 matter Droughty 0.95 Too sandy 0.01 Wetness 0.14 USDA• Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 0 Source of Reclamation Material,Roadfill,and Topsoil—Gallatin County Area, Ellis View Estates Montana • Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 • • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Surrey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative.Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 RUSLE2 Related Attributes--Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • RUSLE2 Related Attributes This report summarizes those soil attributes used by the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation Version 2 (RUSLE2)for the map units in the selected area. The report includes the map unit symbol, the component name, and the percent of the component in the map unit.Soil property data for each map unit component incUde the hydrologic soil group, erosion factors Kf for the surface horizon, erosion factor T, and the representative percentage of sand, silt, and clay in the surface horizon. Report—RUSLE2 Related Attributes RUSLEZRelated'Attributes—Gallatin CountyArea,.Montana" Map symbol and soil name + Pct.of: Slope Hydrologic group Kf; T factor Representative value, map unit length`; (ft)" %•Sande', °n Silt °Ia Clay 350B—Blackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore 90 298 C .32 5 9.2 66.3 24.5 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 85 351 B/D .20 3 39.2 37.3 23.5 • Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 AM Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 0 Physical Soil Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • II Physical Soil Properties This table shows estimates of some physical characteristics and features that affect soil behavior. These estimates are given for the layers of each soil in the survey area.The estimates are based on field observations and on test data for these and similar soils. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Particle size is the effective diameter of a soil particle as measured by sedimentation, sieving, or micrometric methods. Particle sizes are expressed as classes with specific effective diameter class limits. The broad classes are sand, silt, and clay, ranging from the larger to the smaller. Sand as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.05 millimeter to 2 millimeters in diameter. In this table,the estimated sand content of each soil layer is given as a percentage,by weight,of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Silt as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are 0.002 to 0.05 millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated silt content of each soil layer is given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Clay as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles that are less than 0.002 millimeter in diameter. In this table, the estimated clay content of each soil layer is • given as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of sand, silt, and clay affects the physical behavior of a soil. Particle size is important for engineering and agronomic interpretations, for determination of soil hydrologic qualities, and for soil classification. The amount and kind of clay affect the fertility and physical condition of the soil and the ability of the soil to adsorb cations and to retain moisture.They influence shrink- swell potential, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat), plasticity, the ease of soil dispersion, and other soil properties. The amount and kind of clay in a soil also affect tillage and earthmoving operations. Moist bulk density is the weight of soil(ovendry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity, that is, the moisture content at 1/3-or 1/10-bar(33kPa or 10kPa) moisture tension. Weight is determined after the soil is dried at 105 degrees C. In the table, the estimated moist bulk density of each soil horizon is expressed in grams per cubic centimeter of soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. Bulk density data are used to compute linear extensibility, shrink-swell potential, available water capacity, total pore space, and other soil properties. The moist bulk density of a soil indicates the pore space available for water and roots. Depending on soil texture,a bulk density of more than 1.4 can restrict water storage and root penetration. Moist bulk density is influenced by texture, kind of clay, content of organic matter,and soil structure. Saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates in the table are expressed in terms of micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity • (Ksat) is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Surrey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil.Survey Page 1 of 4 Physical Soil Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Available water capacity refers to the quantity of water that the soil is capable of storing for use by plants. The capacity for water storage is given in inches of water per inch of soil for each soil layer.The capacity varies,depending on soil properties that affect retention of water. The most important properties are the content of organic matter,soil texture,bulk density,and soil structure.Available water capacity is an important factor in the choice of plants or crops to be grown and in the design and management of irrigation systems.Available water capacity is not an estimate of the quantity of water actually available to plants at any given time. Linear extensibility refers to the change in length of an unconfined clod as moisture content is decreased from a moist to a dry state. It is an expression of the volume change between the water content of the clod at 1/3-or 1/10-bar tension(33kPa or 10kPa tension)and oven dryness. The volume change is reported in the table as percent change for the whole soil.The amount and type of clay minerals in the soil influence volume change. Linear extensibility is used to determine the shrink-swell potential of soils. The shrink-swell potential is low if the soil has a linear extensibility of less than 3 percent; moderate if 3 to 6 percent;high if 6 to 9 percent;and very high if more than 9 percent. If the linear extensibility is more than 3, shrinking and swelling can cause damage to buildings, roads, and other structures and to plant roots. Special design commonly is needed. Organic matter is the plant and animal residue in the soil at various stages of decomposition. In this table,the estimated content of organic matter is expressed as a percentage, by weight, of the soil material that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. The content of organic matter in a soil can be maintained by returning • crop residue to the soil. Organic matter has a positive effect on available water capacity, water infiltration, soil organism activity,and tilth. It is a source of nitrogen and other nutrients for crops and soil organisms. Erosion factors are shown in the table as the K factor(Kw and KO and the T factor. Erosion factor K indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water.Factor K is one of six factors used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation(USLE) and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to predict the average annual rate of soil loss by sheet and rill erosion in tons per acre per year. The estimates are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter and on soil structure and Ksat.Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal,the higher the value,the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. Erosion factor Kw indicates the erodibility of the whole soil. The estimates are modified by the presence of rock fragments. Erosion factor Kf indicates the erodibility of the fine-earth fraction, or the material less than 2 millimeters in size. Erosion factor T is an estimate of the maximum average annual rate of soil erosion by wind and/or water that can occur without affecting crop productivity over a sustained period. The rate is in tons per acre per year. Wind erodibility groups are made up of soils that have similar properties affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in.cultivated areas. The soils assigned to group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group 8 are the • least susceptible. The groups are described in the"National Soil Survey Handbook." USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Physical Soil Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Wind erodibility index is a numerical value indicating the susceptibility of soil to wind erosion,or the tons per acre per year that can be expected to be lost to wind erosion. There is a close correlation between wind erosion and the texture of the surface layer,the size and durability of surface clods, rock fragments, organic matter, and a calcareous reaction. Soil moisture and frozen soil layers also influence wind erosion. Reference: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. (http://soils.usda.gov) • • U Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Physical Soil Properties-Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates Report—Physical Soil Properties }, ;Physical Soil Properties-Gallatin County Area, +yk-.e-�..,�- w- 7'..L+�.-._._....X� _s�.-.a.�-'�=:s' t-r�:x- tx'7r_dsa - _'c .. ,.,_si ar- 9. -�.z-...c�-"�,Y__.rX:.:61r`_.i` R, -r1. '1 .•e�id7.tea%' �Av.s: .�^ �: „c'• 31 .s.;s-,^.r. .:-a, �7 x r-1 .. °zr .e§...�r- .� :-- -# ;.n ...:..i; r-,,.;,..yam.. _•,:� -,t`•,: ; ;"5� ' .. iMap symbol ; 'Depth ';`Sand:- Sik' 4.Clay " Moist Saturated -Available Lmear' Organic- 'Erosion ; • Wind t "F Wlnd* /and soil name `a ' ~` bulk h d�aulic water { extensibi i 5 matt r Y ' -r Z; G.. ' 'o; c t T r _Y k' _ I ty e .factors � erodibilrty erodrtiility r .denslf.� 'conductivi 'c0 aci w �v- tZ!7Y7 T , o 9 -t }•l�j.. ty ...d:: ty A,#c" ; " �.3 ;•tea rou^ index "+�` "' �.f3f �.,,.�.,��..t;xY,A � ..i. ._ _s�.�, i_K!'.�._.�a s.� ..i` y. -' u... �'� �fr_s•�_�1�� v�'_a- 3.�Cei�*�•:__..� '!*'.'r`s.�`�L[.�� ;a.d .Sc-�_ �.'+; i A�F�•';...-_ -Y:�:x::-a....�f'2� In Pct Pct `Pct g/cc micro m/sec IrOn Pct Pct 3506— Blackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore 0-10 -9- -66- 22-25-27 1.10-1.20 4.00-14.00 0.19-0.22 0.0-2.9 4.0-6.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 10-27 -7- -62- 27-31-35 1.15-1.35 1.40-4.00 0.19-0.22 3.0-5.9 1.0-3.0 .37 .37 27-42 -10- -68- 15-23-30 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.16-0.20 3.0-5.9 0.5-1.0 .49 .49 42-60 -10- -68- 15-23-30 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.15-0.19 3.0-5.9 0.5-1.0 .49 .49 542A— Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 0-15 -39- -37- 20-24-27 1,17-1.27 4.00-14.00 0.17-0.20 0.0-2.9 4.0-6.0 .20 .20 3 6 48 15-24 -55- -17- 20-28-35 1.11 1.31 1.40-14.00 0.15-0.18 3.0-5.9 2.0-4.0 .17 .17 24-60 -84- -11- 0-5-10 1.50-1.70 42.00-141.00 0.02-0.03 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5 .02 .05 Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 UlmConservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 • Engineering Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Engineering Properties This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area. Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated. Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam,"for example, is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and.less than 52 percent sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly." Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification system (ASTM, 2005)and the system adopted by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO, 2004). The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as construction material. Soils are classified according to particle-size distribution of the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW, GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH, and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML. The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect roadway construction and maintenance. In this system,the fraction of a mineral soil that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1 through A-7 on the basis of particle-size distribution, liquid limit,and plasticity index. Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay).At the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection. If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified as A-1-a, A-1-b, A-24, A-2-5,A-2-6, A-2-7,A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an additional refinement,the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material to 20 or higher for the poorest. Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches.in diameter are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry-weight basis. The percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in the field to weight percentage. Percentage (of soil particles)passing designated sieves is the percentage of the soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight.The sieves, numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00, 0.420,and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in the field. Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil.The estimates are based on test data from the survey area or from nearby areas and on field examination. • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 211111111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 0 • Engineering Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates References: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing.24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. • USDA • Natural Resources, Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 ® Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Engineering Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates Report—Engineering Properties Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated. The asterisk"' denotes the representative.texture; other possible textures follow the dash. :. Y wr�+ �W..i�r ♦Y .y,.i` Y i 1. .. .r.J.�:..-`i'1a Y s.' Sy ri {. - 1, (^ b'S( `! 3 * � gineeringProperties='GallatinCou^q�tyArea Montanattt � •a r� _ .*� i .........a�d.. ".. .. .�y�. ^.' �� Map unit symbol and soil ;;;Depth• �� 4USDA texture ', , Classification< *• F„ Fragments;;] t V;Oercentage passing sieve number— y�ry `;Ligmd A Plasticity, }�}' .:name 7 '`f 39Y< �Ja`.��'r . ¢`s, r=-#+ricS't 'H> :e� . vtm y_ ���_s�,.r `,• u. - il ,''Y . . , r - 'mde9limiter Zi4 � 10>10�; s31 0f �T y *'' .. k '.;v- "" } •sf`'' ,,; 2; o °ii ..,the.by v„"`7 inches � �<��' "�_ � �` �...._t� � � ,ti, � • -dR�`t..=-...'�?�a�-1,''SY.:e.._ ��. .Iu-t _�f'�k>Jn. aSf ,.27.nn •Jt � �'.. •^.i .:S.�.Y��r sr { In Pct Pct Pct 3506—Blackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore 0-10 *Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 10-27 *Silty clay loam CL A-6 0 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 30-40 10-20 27-42 *Silt loam,Silty clay loam CL,CL- A-4,A-6 0 0 100 100 90-100 80-90 25-35 5-15 ML 42-60 *Silt loam,Silty clay loam CL,CL- A-4,A-6 0 0 100 85-100 75-100 65-90 25-35 5-1.5 ML 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 0-15 *Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0-10 90-100 85-100 70-95 50-75 25-30 5-10 15-24 *Sandy clay loam, CL,SC, A-21 A-4, 0 0-15 70-100 65-100 50-95 30-60 25-35 5-15 • Gravelly loam,clay Sc- A-6 loam SM, CL-ML 24-60 *Extremely gravelly loamy SP-SM, A-1 0 30-45 25-75 20-70 10-50 5-20 20-25 NP-5 coarse sand,Very GM, cobbly sand,very GP- gravelly loamy coarse GM, sand SM USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Engineering Properties—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16,Apr 18, 2012 • I • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 .g" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 • 0 Soil Features—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Soil Features This table gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. A restrictive layer is a nearly continuous layer that has one or more physical, chemical, or thermal properties that significantly impede the movement of water and air through the soil or that restrict roots or otherwise provide an unfavorable root environment. Examples are bedrock, cemented layers, dense layers, and frozen layers.The table indicates the hardness and thickness of the restrictive layer, both of which significantly affect the ease of excavation. Depth to top is the vertical distance from the soil surface to the upper boundary of the restrictive layer. Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence generally results from either desiccation and shrinkage, or oxidation of organic material,or both,following drainage.Subsidence takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. The table shows the expected initial subsidence,which usually is a result of drainage,and total subsidence,which results from a combination of factors. Potential for frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the formation of segregated ice lenses(frost heave)and the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost action occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density, saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat), content of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the potential for • frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially drained. Silty and highly structured, clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to frost action. Well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low sod strength during thawing cause damage to pavements and other rigid structures. Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle-size distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content,and acidity of the soil.Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion. The steel or concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the steel or concrete in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of corrosion, expressed as low, moderate, or high, is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical resistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract. For concrete, the risk of corrosion also is expressed as low, moderate, or high. It is based on soil texture, acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract. • USDA Natural Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 s Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Soil Features-Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates Report—Soil Features �3; .rti ,--•--w+ e--.., .aYzs-s•a-:..•-•a -S y �;ns �. ;.i-s; s .,,�.'�-cau --rr.�.:n�.e:• 3?. -c.^ —c. s,.- ,e �._'1�y-.,�'},.. _3as�a' ' - .F - 7"..,7:., ure -Gallatin C unty Area Montana-<;r,+•s Y �- �t n. � .x,° '; �c Feat s- o n�, s ,p **�,,,, �.c<ta�« • �i` '' :, �3+rs �"� :�•;r.-t.- .�".x ,f*. ;— +^ •-3.- c,; r. ;.. ,-. a .- .. ae-.--s� x.. .�;_".�,.-� T-.� a.,zra .•.�.-•.; Map symbol and 3 ten : „;Restnctrve Layer .� *� t t r ;y �+ ,� s4 Subsidence r Potential for frost ' t Risk of corrosion Kso�!'name if'" :rtt, .�w. ; �. n __. ,� 'saCtion � rtsrY;.• x gKmd,=r. Depth to .,*- it NCkness,-J j- �HaMnessr •.Initial ?,Total 3 ,+. �,Wncoated steel,{ ; ,Concrete r a .. , "; t0 .. t�.rrt,• �.'4:'3i ,$ s .,. •" 'r'.ck,4, �'-''�L -�. y .� ;.'�.s.M y ,T � e t p' ;Y��`Y�.."i_.,t�'.�i� r' � t._:��,7'-w,':��'� a�;w ��'S'a �:�`a:,Y'•3,.C:.iV+�:'�',.C`�t,-'1: .�: .,..i�'�t7`� In In In In • 3506—Blackmore silt loam,0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore — — 0 — High Low Low 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg — — 0 — High High Moderate Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16, Apr 18, 2012 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 '� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Water Features—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates I Water Features This table gives estimates of various soil water features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves engineering considerations. Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. I The four hydrologic soil groups are: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential)when • thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Surface runoff refers to the loss of water from an area by flow over the land surface. Surface runoff classes are based on slope, climate, and vegetative cover. The concept indicates relative runoff for very specific conditions. It is assumed that the surface of the soil is bare and that the retention of surface water resulting from irregularities in the ground surface is minimal.The classes are negligible,very law, low, medium, high, and very high. The months in the table indicate the portion of the year in which a water table, ponding, and/or flooding is most likely to be a concern. Watertable refers to a saturated zone in the soil.The water features table indicates, by month,depth to the top(upper limit)and base(lower limit)of the saturated zone in most years. Estimates of the upper and lower limits are based mainly on observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors or mottles (redoximorphic features) in the soil.A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. USDA• Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/112013 Aiiiiiiiiiiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 • • Water Features—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. Unless a drainage system is installed, the water is removed only by percolation, transpiration, or evaporation. The table indicates surface waterdepth and the duration and frequency of ponding. Duration is expressed as very brief if less than 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days,long if 7 to 30 days, and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none, rare,occasional, and frequent.None means that ponding is not probable;rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions(the chance of ponding is nearly 0 percent to 5 percent in any year); occasional that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years (the chance of ponding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); and frequent that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years (tha chance of ponding is more than 50 percent in any year). Flooding is the temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams,by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. Duration and frequency are estimated. Duration is expressed as extremely brief if 0.1 hour to 4 hours, very brief if 4 hours to 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days,and very long if more than 30 days. Frequency is expressed as none,very rare, rare,occasional,frequent,and very frequent.None means that flooding is not probable; very rare that it is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual weather conditions (the chance of flooding is less than 1 percent in any year); rare that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions(the chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year);occasional that it occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year); • frequent that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions(the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50 percent in all months in any year); and very frequent that it is likely to occur very often under normal weather conditions (the chance of flooding is more than 50 percent in all months of any year). The information is based on evidence in the soil profile, namely thin strata of gravel, sand, silt, or clay deposited by floodwater; irregular decrease in organic matter content with increasing depth; and little or no horizon development. Also considered are local information about the extent and levels of flooding ant. the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods.Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. USDA• Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of Water Features—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates Report—Water Features '���.�� � .y,. w:.s'�..? s.:� 'aSr+•'�"?"r ,��_ _ --w.`,,�. Area, ,Feat Gallatin bounty MOntdna' y ' F• —�-:.�:,-..ae.....ti._:aaT.r-�. .�'�aet•ar...v,+,_r..ua'._ 1.�:.z.+ ._sr..+,�i„'3e;;_y.�,-i.;..,:�u�.e iMap,unrtSymbolandsoilr ��Mydrologic =�Surfac6 u Month %�� � ����a laterjtablelp- �� ��:� '.` �P.ondin���� ��"' �" t.�xt'..' Flooclln �,y,,� k� w tr,a'` ..�.:�tk L``o� -�_E�e �., w g name is fir; ` *, 9: 1 » tgroupa{� c rur►off�' ?"" v .z� r c ti�zsTL _r as ;fi z � srs, ,�r q, s: + �, F«, - t : ; ,Upper.hmit ,Lower,limity 3;'Surfac_e� Duration ,Frequency' ='DurationF,�equency��'r� w w rt ski,,? e v 3 r�s "` ac depth r„ t° e 1" i"u.»:'z..t v ._.r.__ 4 n- .5. 3a ,-i '�r +a_'�'':► si; Fr Ft Ft 35O13—Blackmore silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes Blackmore C — Jan-Dec — — — — None — — 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg B/D — April 1.0-2.0 >6.0 — — None — None B/D — May 1.0-2.0 >6.0 — — None — None B/D — June 1.0-2.0 >6.0 — — None — None B/D — July 1.0-2.0 >6.0 — — None — None Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16, Apr 18, 2012 • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 • • Hydric Soils—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • Hydric Soils This table lists the map unit components that are rated as hydric soils in the survey area. This list can help in planning land uses; however, onsite investigation is recommended to determine the hydric soils on a specific site(National Research Council, 1995; Hurt and others, 2002). The three essential characteristics of wetlands are hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology(Cowardin and others, 1979; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1987; National Research Council, 1995; Tiner, 1985). Criteria for all of the characteristics must be met for areas to be identified as wetlands. Undrained hydric soils that have natural vegetation should support a dominant population of ecological wetland plant species. Hydric soils that have been converted to other uses should be capable of being restored to wetlands. Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Federal Register, 1994). These soils, under natural conditions, are either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation. The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and • duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register, 2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are: associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties that are described in"Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the"Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993). If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric, they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in"Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006). Hydric soils are identified by examining and describing the soil to a depth of about 20 inches. This depth may be greater if determination of an appropriate indicator so requires. It is always recommended that soils be excavated and described to the depth necessary for an understanding of the redoximorphic processes. Then, using the completed soil descriptions, soil scientists can compare the soil features required by each indicator and specify which indicators have been matched with the conditions observed in the soil. The soil can be identified as a hydric soil if at least one of the approved indicators is present. Map units that are dominantly made up of hydric soils may have small areas, or I inclusions,of nonhydric soils in the higher positions on the landform,and map units dominantly made up of nonhydric soils may have inclusions of hydric soils in the lower positions on the landform. The criteria for hydric soils are represented by codes in the table(for example,2133). • Definitions for the codes are as follows: USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 i 0 • Hydric Soils—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • 1. All Histels except for Folistels, and Histosols except for Folists. 2. Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups,Albolls suborder, Historthels great group, Histoturbels great group, or Andic, Cumulic, Pachic, or Vitrandic subgroups that: A. are somewhat poorly drained and have a water table at the surface(0.0 feet)during the growing season, or B. are poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: i. a water table at the surface(0.0 feet)during the growing season if textures are coarse sand,sand,or fine sand in all layers within a depth of 20 inches, or ii. a water table at a depth of 0.5 foot or less during the growing season if saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ksat) is equal to or greater than 6.0 in/hr in all layers within a depth of 20 inches, or iii. a water table at a depth of 1.0 foot or less during the growing season if saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is less than 6.0 in/hr in any layer within a depth of 20 inches. 3. Soils that are frequently ponded for long or very long duration during the growing season. 4. Soils that are frequently flooded for long or very long duration during the growing season. References: • Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council, 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy:A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys.2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control,Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. Report—Hydric Soils • USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 i • Hydric Soils—Gallatin County Area,Montana Ellis View Estates • ��.�� �.^�ou..R v r•- - �- yL_ ".:2�y aw .-r.Lh 9."rY'>.ti D x"'4t.' ._� ,,;ru• f� r W�� J•ri�. s. •t y I,sA �� + a.`, c Hydrlc Soils Gallatin County Area; l Mon +F .si .n� Y alb:.. . 5., ,v'.L, ✓__ _a•Lr...., ,r : $ l....f:?iar 11!.C� n :.� .l i:ta- .d'l .!^;' t`1Map symbot'and map unit,namex Its�tt C'omponent ,Percent of # tLandform� , , Hydiic�•Yi t�t�t ``" ' "+ I� Z ��Xcriteria, i F 3,_t~ mapfunit r,u >_ r .ten#_. ��. G ' ft�c " YF sr 542A—Blossberg loam,0 to 2 percent slopes Blossberg 85 Stream terraces 283 (p w�s�.:,:.�.,..T- Zn`�•`ta"'q-� +sue;�.a �y� y^iav-te ar„�x9 d rTt:�^ r '1 _-.s"ds.'� .'gip a- �� �. V`1'�.����X�s�s(t�..4&ki,�'..FTo,�U.. ���~ Bonebasin�„e-'�i-;•-+ #..�., �.. 3, r... .'I.+'_ :�� 2B3�3�+� i Data Source Information . Soil Survey Area: Gallatin County Area, Montana Survey Area Data: Version 16, Apr 18, 2012 USDA• Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2l1/2013 ® Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 D -o CD X. n • :' • ,.r' • APPENDIX C STORM WATER PLAN • STORM WATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS ELLIS VIEW ESTATES PUD SUBDIVISION Prepared for: Mahar Montana Homes 1627 W. Main Street, #370, Bozeman, MT 59718 • Prepared by: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1,091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 (406)587-1115 Project Number: 114,89 April 2013 • • STORM WATER MANAGEMENT The storm water run-off generated from the proposed buildings and roadways associated with this subdivision will be conveyed via surface flow to the two storm water inlets located in the curb line at the northeast corner of Ellis View Loop. The curb inlets will collect the storm water and divert it into a series of pipes connected. to an above ground retention pond at the northeast corner of the property. The following calculations are based on design procedures outlined in the City of Bozeman Design Standards. The runoff coefficient for the site is calculated as follows: Roadway& Sidewalk Pavement/Concrete(C=0.90) = 34,686 sq ft Driveway& Walkway Pavement/Conerete(C=0.90) = 7,300 sq ft Roof Area(C=0.85) =22,500 sq ft Grass/Landscaping Area(C=0.30) = 153,750 sq ft Total Area =218,236 sq ft • Runoff Coefficient(C) = (41,9860.90 +22,500x0.85 + 153,750x0.30)/218,236= 0.47 The volume of a retention pond sized to handle 10-yr 2-hr storm.event is calculated as follows: Q = CiA Q= storm water runoff rate (cfs) ilo = 0.64(f1.65)= 0.64(2 hrs)-o.61 = 0.408 in/hi d= (0.408 in/hr)x(1 ft/12 in)x(2 hr) C =runoff coefficient d = 0.068 ft d =depth of rainfall (ft) V = CdA A= surface area(ft) V =total volume required V = 0.47 x 0.068 ft x 218,236 ft2 =6,975 ft3 = volume to be retained The proposed retention pond will be 2-feet deep with a mid-depth surface area of 3,500 ft2 -providing 7,000 ft3 of storage. • gAc&h\I1\11489\preliminary plat\storm calcs.docx D • a a a k 0 APPENDIX D Ti2AFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • Access to Ellis View Estates Subdivision will be provided from two approaches off of South Third Avenue. Ellis View Loop will be constructed to local street standards with a 53-foot right- of-way width and a back of curb width of 31 feet. The right-of-way will also include a 5-foot wide sidewalk and a 5-foot wide boulevard. Road maintenance for all streets will be provided by the City of Bozeman after the improvements have been accepted by the City. Stormwater runoff from the street will be treated with a retention facility constructed in Open Space 2 in the north portion of the property. Erosion and siltation control will be exercised during construction by using the appropriate best management practices as outlined in"Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Manual"(May 1993)prepared by the MDEQ Water Quality Bureau. Limited increases in traffic are anticipated with this proposal. An MDT traffic count conducted on South Third Avenue just north of the Cambridge Drive in 2010 determined the annual average daily traffic near the proposed site was 2,650 vehicles. Assuming a daily average of 9.55 trips per dwelling unit(Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 1991),the proposed subdivision will result in an additional 85.95 trips per day on South Third Avenue. Since this proposed subdivision is created from one existing tract of land, the additional eight (8) lots results in an increase of 76.40 trips per day from planned use. The 85.95 additional trips onto South Third Avenue will result in a 3.2% increase in traffic on South Third Avenue. G:\c&h\l l\l 1489\Preliminary PlatUraffic Analysiffraffic Analysis.doc • • D , a b m ��, • � m � • . • APPENDIX E RESPONSE LETTERS Engineering and Surveying Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman,Montana • Phone(406)587-1115 Fax(406)587-9768 www.chengineers.com ••E-Mail:inf6@chengineers.c0m December-.12; 2012 American Medical Response Attn: Operations Manager 2101 Industrial Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE '14 of Section..25,'T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Sir or Madame, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Cominent Form required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3�d Avenue,west of Good Medicine • Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. THe State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, Ma i terman, >✓., P.L.S. Enc. 0:\CSI-I\I I\114.89\12.12.12 ar•"sro\sr:l.f_TTGZs.Doc Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying •:Engineering.arid SurVeyliig Inc. 1093 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman;Montana: Phone.(406)'587-1115 '.Fax(406)587-9.768 www:chengineers.com`+ E-Mail,•info@ctiehgifie'e ri,.com December 12;2012 Bresnan Coin mulii cation s Attu: Scott Riis. . 511 Vest Mendenhall Street Bozernan, MT '59715 R Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision,'NE''/4 of-Section.25, T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Scott, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and ' ".a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the`City ofBozeiman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,.east of South 3r�Avenue,west of Good Medicine Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little'Horse Drive. This pfdject will include 9.lots developed- as'a planned unit development•with single•family.residential.homes: We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Community.Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enelosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability'to.provide services to the area. The State of Mdntana•Subd)vision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be'affected by new development. We appi.eciate your assistance and prompt reply:•Please contact, -'.our office if you have any questions,thank you. " Sincerely, Ma "erman, : .,•P.L.S. Enc. : . . GAC&IN 1\114SQ\12.12.121tGSPONSE LL"rFEItS:DOC . Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying - Engineering`and_ Surveying Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive -'Bozeman, Montana Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587_-9768 www.chengineers.com • E-Mail:info@chengineers.com December 1,2, 2012 Allied Waste Systems Attn: Harry Kirschenbaum P.O. Box 10730 Bozeman, MT 59719 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE 1/4 of Section 25, T2S, RSE, Bozeman (11489) Dear Harry, Enclosed please .find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3"d Avenue,west of Good Medicine • Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9'ots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you'have any questions, thank you. ' Sincerely, MattheKot��eman, P. L- Eric. . ; GAM 1\I 1\11489\12.12.12 RESPONSE 1,111'rnis.DOC Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying Eriglneering and Surveying Inca , 1091 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman,-, ontana 6.Phone(406)"587-1115•� Fax(406).587-9768 www.cherigineers corh • E-Mail.info@thengineers.cohi- December' 2.2012•.: Bozeman Public School'.District Attn:Kevin Barre, Director of Facilities. P.O.Box 520 Bozeman, MT 59771-0520 RE:- Proposed.'E11is View Estates Subdivision; NE '/4 9f•Section=25, US, R5E, Bozeman (11.489) ; Dear:Kevin, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat ofEllis View Estates Subdivision and a;copy of the Agency Review and Commentform required'by the City of Bozerhan. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,:east"of South 3rd Avenue,west of Good Medicine . Way between Wagon Wheel Road and'Uftle•H.brse Drive. This.project will'include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family-�.esidential homes. We are presently preparing an.Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are .requesting your help.' Please review-the enclostires and provide your written comments addressing the effects this projeUrnay have on the community and your•ability.to provide services to the area. Tie State of Montana Subdivision,Regulations,•require written comments on the services which will. be affected by new development. -We appreciate your assistance.•and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any-questions, thank'you. Sincerely, attheVWo;t1 an, Eric.'. O:\C&1;1w\I 1489\Ii.12.12 RLSPONSL.LITI'L•RS.DOC , Civil/Structural:Engineering and Surveying' " NMI Engineering.and'Surveying Inc.: 1091-Stoneridge Drive Bozeman,Montana • Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587-9.768 www.chengineers.com • E-Mail:info@chengineers.com` December 12', 2012 Bozeman Deaconess Hospital ' Attn:.John Nordwick, President/CEO 915 Highland Boulevard' Bozeman,MT 59715 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE '/4 of Section 25, T2S, RSE, Bozeman (11489) Dear John, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review,and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City ofBozemaii,east of South 3rd Avenue,west of Good Medicine • Way between Wagon Wheel.Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Cormnunity Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate•your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any.questions,thank you. Sincerely, Matthe Co , an, S. Enc. G:\C&1-1\11\11459\12.12.12 RESPONSL•LE'I-1'ERS.DOC ' Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying Engineering and Surveying.;Ind., 1091 Stoneridge Drive •'Bozeman;Montana.-'Phone(406)587-1115,•. Fax(406)587-9768 www.chengin.eers.com • E-Mail:info@chengineers.bom December 12, 2012 Montana:Historical Society' Attn: Damon M- rdo, Cultural Records Manager Historic Preservation Office " P.O. Box 201201 Helena, MT 59"620-1201, RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE 114 of Section 25, T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Damon, Enclosed please find a copy ofthe proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed •. subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3'd Avenue,west of Good Medicine Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an-Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, Matthew terman, , P.L.S. Eric..' G•:\C&H\I 1\I 1489\12.12,12 RESPONSE LE17L'RS.DOC Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying . r I Engineering and Surveying Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman,Montana • Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587-9768 www.chengine,ers.com•• E-Mail: info@chengineers.com December.12, 2012 MT Department of Fish, Wildlife &Parks Attn: Pat Flowers, Regional Supervisor. 1400 South 19th Avenue Bozeman,MT 59715 -RE: 'Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE '/4 of Section 25, T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11.489) Dear Pat, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3`d Avenue,west of Good Medicine • Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 iots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your.assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, Zrimban, att P.E., P.L.S. Eric. GAC&I•Al M 1489\I2.12.12 RFSPONSE LETI'FRSMOC Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying Engineering",;E§nd-Sui-vevin.g,ln'c. , 1091 Stoneridge Drive- Bozeman,IVlontana Phone(406j 587-1115 Faz(406)587-9768 %vvMxhengineers.corn • E-mail:info@chengineets.com December 12,•2012 NortliWestern Energy. :Attn: Randy.Sullivan ' 121 East Griffin Drive Bozeman,MT 59771=0490 R>C:. , No .Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE 1/4of Section 25, T2S; RSC, Bozeman (11489) Deai' Randy, Enclosed please find a copy-of the proposed•preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates,Subdivision and a•copyof the Agency Review and Comment.Form.required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed ' subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman;east of South"d Avenue,west of Good Medicine, • Way between Wagon Wheel,Road and.Little..Horse Drive. This.project will,include-9 lots_developed as a planned-unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessirlent/Comm;unity-lmpact-Statement; and are - requesting'your help.:Please review'the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing ' the effects this project may•have on the'community and'your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana'SUbd'ivision Regulations require written comrnents on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and•prompt reply. Please contact our'o.ffice if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, tittle man-, ., S. CAU14111\1148911�:12.12 118PONSC LC'ITLRS.D.UC Civil% tructuralingineering.and Surveying FC Engineering'and Surveying Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman,Montana Phone(406)587-1115'•'Fax((406)587-9768 www.chengineers.com • E-Mail:info@chengineers.com December 12, 2012 ; QWest Communications 2767.West Main-Street Bozeman,MT. 59718 RC: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE '/ of Section 25, T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Sir or Madame, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary-plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency, Review and Comment Form required by the City' of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3rd Avenue,west of Good Mediciiie -Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. • We are-presently preparing an Environmental As sessment/Coinmunity Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project niay•have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area.- The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will -be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank'you. Sincerely, IVIa tot 96rinan, P.E. P.L.S. Enc.' • GAM AI I\I 1439\12.12.12 RI-SPONSE LL'•'1TERS.DOC Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying Engineering and.Surveying Inc: 1091 Stoneridge Drive,* Bozeman,Montana • Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587-9768. www.chengineers.coi6 + E-Mail:info@chendineers.com - December 12, 2012 U.S.P.S. - Bozeman -.Attn: Post Master 2201 Baxter Lane Bozeman, MT 59718-9998 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE I/4 of Section 25, US, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Sir or Madame, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. Tile proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3d Avenue;west of Good Medicine • Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Cornmunity Impact-Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area: The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written-comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if,you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, Matthe/C(tte"rn_ian. , '.C.S. Enc. GX&H\11\11489\12.I2.12 RESPONSE LL ITERS.DOC Civil/Structural.Engineering and Surveying' Engineering and Surveying Inc. ' 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman,Montana -Phone(406)587-1115'- Fax(406)587-9768 www-chengineers.com ••E-Mail:info@chengineers.com December 12,1 2012 Yellowstone Pipeline Company 318 W. Griffin Bozeman, MT 59715-2297 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE 1/4 of Section 25, T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Sit'or Madame, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by-the City of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3`d Avenue,west of Good Medicine Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive: This project will include 9 lots developed • as a planned unit development with single family residential-homes. We'are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are requesting your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulationssrequire written comments on the services which wi I I be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance'and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, Zatth of �' n n, P.E., P.L.S. Eric. GAMMI I\11459112..12.13 RrSPONSr Lr"rrrRS.DOC Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying El Engineering�and•Su6ieying Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman,Montana,*,Phohe(406)5874115 • Fax(406)587-9768 www.cfierigineers.com • E=Mail:info@cherigineers.com December 12, 2012 Streamline Transit 1812 N. Rouse Aveuue Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE..'/'of Section 25, T2S, R5E, Bozeman (11489) Dear Sir or Madame,. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliininary plat,of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. The proposed subdivision is located within the City of Bozeman,east of South 3'd Avenue,west of Good Medicine Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This,project will include 9 lots developed as a planned unit development with single family'residential homes. • We are presently preparing an Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement, and are requesting-your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, Matthew -otterman,P.E., P.L.S. Eric. G:\C&1-1\1 1\1 1489\12.12.12 RESPONSE LEITERS.DOC f Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying Engineering and'Surveying-Inc., " 1091 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman,•Montana • Phone.(406)587-1115 •Fax(406)587-9768 vrww.chengineers.com • E-Mali:info@chengineers,com December 12,2012 American Medical Response Attn: Operations Manager . 2101 Industrial Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision, NE '%4 of Section 25, T2S, RSE, Bozeman (11489) Dear Sir or Madame, Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed preliminary plat of Ellis View Estates Subdivision and a,copy of the Agency Review and Comment Form required by the City of Bozeman. "The proposed subdivision is located within the City of-Bozeman,east of South 3rd Avenue,west of Good Medicine Way between Wagon Wheel Road and Little Horse Drive. This project will include 9 lots developed • as a planned unit development with single family residential homes. We are presently preparing an Environmental°Assessment/Comniunity-Impact Staten_ent, and are requesting.your help. Please review the enclosures and provide your written comments addressing the effects this project may have on the community and your ability.to provide services to the area. The State of Montana Subdivision Regulations require written comments on the services which will be affected by new development. We.appreciate your assistance and prompt reply. Please contact our office if you have any questions, thank you. Sincerely, att#eCOeriLnan, Eric. GAM-1\I 1\11489\12.12.12 RESPONSE_LfTrERS.DOC Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying 0 0 AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM Preliminary Plat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the City of Bozeman Project Name: .1�ejcJe5 Date Preliminary Plat Prepared: �a �.1 )3 Reviewer's Name: VV A�Ikl 1060yt C, Title: __ c,+�5 �vt� 0✓1 SUD��'�1+sd Reviewer's Address: 5 I i w• Mej,,o kJ Phone Number: ` X- �J3` ���a� Fax Number: LIX-516-C3-'6. E-mail Address: 1f1XV73q@Ca le\)%-5iodl.ro!m Agency. -' ❑ Montana Fish,Wildlife and Parks ❑ AT8ff Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Qwest ❑ Bozeman School District#7 ❑ U.S. Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Company ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline Company R'Other: QO_bI AM Comments: • 1. ❑ I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have no comments. 2. 0--Iliave reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have the following comments: / I Signature: 1 14 Date: 13 f 3 Please attach a reduced copy(81/2- by 11-inch or 11- by 17-inch) of the preliminary plat you reviewed. (Prepared 11-15-02) SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO Pf''� IARY PLAT OF CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELLIS VIEW ESTATES .SUBDIVISION LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF . RECORD BEING 'AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, M/NOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35—A OWNER: MAHAR MONTANA HOMES ,LOCA'TED IN. THE'NE 1/4,' SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA: i EXISTING ZON4NG:.R—S(COUNTY) \\ \� LOT 12 \ \ REARRANGEhAENT. OF SUBDIV. \ /' ARFA T—�U1 A1'ONATaN " I LOT LOT AREA-121,070 50 FT - 55% Od. Gaston me � �' \ N0. 8-8 OF SOURDOUGH PARKLAND -.1&184 SO FT 8% OPEN SPACE-3& 10'362 SO FT- 18x fnd:Gaston we MINOR SUB NO. 310' \ �\ CREEK PROPERTIES \ /' gL(�c c Ts�•40.83a:u FT_1Rx Wide Utility Easement \ Y TOTAL'AREA'-218.250 SO FT ;" ,iu, I [N89'40'00-E] pARKLAND REQUIRED-11.781 SO FT N, OPEN SPACE REQUIRED-24,214 SO Fr i 6961 C!?' - I 3 "r"————- —r �>r�u•oc�—. 1 60 \ i� ^ NO.t\E4 Q o a OP .5 9 Sq n, 2 4267 �laO\J.OQ�F Q� �1tL 1 I � ,� ,� .e.,s�,•,z LOT 1 N O �-I _ I. (z DITCH `o? �\, y ,0.,52 sa R 72.5' WIDE PUBLIC CCESS AND UTILITY EASE ENT PER MINOR-SUBDINSION No. 358 OF 5 QQ' s aE . LLJ I �".. ► I e .'a $ ,\i \lg e i.\ �.. 'UOG \AS/SIGN 1C,11 I P i t LOT 2 U \ RP 0.4Rz sn QV / .� LOT 9 LOT 8' \\(� e , n $. \ C \ RC OF c�0`� Zv. Z.. S,F,. Q zzus4n $ pe;A .e \ ayt \ \ \\ OF UNPLATTED . a Y ': ��'` GU \ GOLDEN=TEIN .s� a 1 \ Set C&H RPQ, LIMITED j Z \\ d0 ,5/8' Rebar Lu PARTNERSHIP. a 9a.,6 Wo.w1 c. ze.J6 a�Qaa•�r � � \ � EX. ZONING. R—S C�r '11 a q o \ \ \7 LOT 3 I \ 0 \\ (Cl TEMPORARY EASEMENT! -\ \ f�- Y) '1 "r \ 7 FOR CUL-DE-SAC PER \ \ ' > 1,o " %—`•' , MINOR SUBDIVISION No. ` 358 y5 ,.. OPEN SPACE I I oc LOT 6 $ eLOTjw 7 I II � y os.s4 n $. ,eaa1`q n om \ � .. saCT / i 4 •' LW.4 U \ RIM=5E-0 i j a 1d Sq \ FL 41 FL NW= L� '10 53s or Scale In Feet 7 ,5 °-87. \ 60 0 60 I �. I 41S2T'Sir �96-W s?mob 0 18 Scale In Meters } \ �— \ \\y x�T n ''DDJ t�SP E 2 \ .'1 c--- -- I f •' ''� I� PARK \ � � �� >a° °s"a`•- .—. .�,� / Wide Utility Ea sement t per Minor Subdivisionsion No. 35-A —— —PROPOSED /' . �+ \ L—— - ——————— SEWER EASEMEN _ \ 07 _e-n,M^.°'34sa°nc —� tel`nd. RPC No. 11- Engineering and Surveying'inc. I Fnd. Gaston YPC d. Castoa YP. J' 1091 S_.jd9e•Drive•6aze .MT 59718 ' - - ('� .� Phwe 14D8)587-1115•F.1406)587.9768 J o- O?E N- J �.�, 'roe nd. RPC No. NNI ES •e�xv.chengiheers.cam-inta®0hengineemoom Sheet 1 Of ! 'I M POINT OF BEGINNING 6' a Trail #11489 • AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM Preliminary Plat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the City of Bozeman Project Name: ?t//L, ' Date Preliminary Plat Prepared: Reviewer's Name: wle,4ad kl�-44L Title: �a iSo (ra/� •� reS �io% /s� Reviewer's Address: l y00 S Q 7�g Xy 47--P—ia _ J 7/8 Phone Number: (0/f-5y Fax Number: E-mail Address: r/ Agency. t<Montana Fish,Wildlife and Parks ❑ AT&T Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Qwest ❑ Bozeman School District#7 ❑ U.S. Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Company ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline Company ❑ Other: Comments: • 1. I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have no comments. 2. ❑ I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have the following comments: res, p? Signature: Date: z; V /3 Please attach a reduced copy( 1/Z- by 11-inch or 11- by 17-inch) of the preliminary plat you reviewed. (Prepared 11-15-02) AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM Preliminary Plat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the City of Bozeman • Project Name: Ellis View Estates Date Preliminary Plat Prepared: Reviewer's Name: Lee Hazelbaker Title: -Director of Tran--g1Qrtati0n1HRnC Reviewer's Address: 32 South Tracy Rn7Prrian I K-AT 59715 Phone Number: 406 587 2434 Fax Number: 406 582 7946 E-mail Address: Agency. ❑ Montana Fish, Wildhfe and Pariz ❑ AT&T Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Qwest ❑ Bozeman School District t 7 ❑ U.S. Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Company ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline Company ❑ Other: Streamline Transportation Comments: • 1. ❑ I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have no comments. 2. [ I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have the following comments: The Streamline bus service does not currently serve this part of town. We would like to in the futu but we would probably not enter into the streets of the subdivision. 239 • Signature -�--- Date: Please attach a reduced copy(81/2- by 11-inch or 11- by 17-inch) of,the preliminary plat you reviewed. (Prepared 11-15-02) i AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM Preliminary Plat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the City of Bozeman Project Name: l 1 S i s Date Preliminary Plat Prepared: (` 'Aw f Reviewer's Name: ���� gae�`o 1' /,A-U,�dv Title: S v�as�t��, lic�. ��•�.G�c �. Reviewer's Address: I a c y`e- Phone Number: — ��c�'�_.�`�U� 15O`'1 Fax Number: E-mail Address: Agency. ❑ Montana Fish,Wildlife and Parks ❑ AT&T Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Qwest ❑ Bozeman School District#7 U.S.Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Company ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline Company ❑ Other: Comments: • 1. ❑ I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have no comments. 2. .have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have the following comments: P0 V CA 1/1'Zf CIV 0 a C � � 7v'ov tGle� � � G` �V C. ev , • wul Signature: l� Dater '7-,,, � Please attach a reduced copy(81h- by 11-inch or 11- by 17-inch) of the preliminary plat you reviewed. (Prepared 11-15-02) I De.c. 11. 2012 9:40AM oco Philips Helena No. 0'61 P. 1 AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM • Neiiminaty Plat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the Oty of Bozeman .Project Name: �( t ► �� `� 64 X7atePielirninaryPlatPrepared: Reviewer's v r Name: k G. d 1�5��t d— Tide: Reviewer's Address; �� (`�`"� �- �° ( r`� 4 & 3 " U� Phone Number: d `� �' 4AX Number., " `/ S Q L( � E-mail Address: Agency: ❑ Montana Pish,Wildlife and Parks ❑ A'TWI'Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Qwest ❑ Bozeman School District N 7 ❑ U.S.Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Gompany 6/le-Howstone Pipeline Company ❑ Other: Comments: • 1. ,have reviewed the atmehed preliminary plat,and have no comments, 2, ❑ Y have reviewed the attached pre%uinaryplat,and have the following comments: 5ig�xttue: Dace: 7 fZ • Please attach.a reduced copy(8r/2-.by 11-inch or 11- by 1J'•inch) of the prelinxina y plat you reviewed, (Prepared 11-15.02) Historic Preservation Big Sky.Big Land.Big History. Museum Montana Outreach&Intei pretation Publications Research Center December 14, 2012 Matthew Cotterman C&H Engineering&Surveying, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman MT 59718 RE: PROPOSED ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION. SHPO Project#:2012121407 Dear Mr. Cotterman: I have conducted a cultural resource file search for the above-cited project. According to our records there have been no previously recorded sites within the designated search locale. The absence of cultural properties in the area does not mean that they do not exist but rather may reflect the absence of any previous cultural resource inventory in the area, as our records indicated none. It is SHPO's position that any structure over fifty years of age is considered historic and is potentially • eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. If any structures are to be altered and are over fifty years old we would recommend that they be recorded and a determination of their eligibility be made. As long as there will be no disturbance or alteration to structures over fifty years of age we feel that there is a low likelihood cultural properties will be impacted. We,therefore,feel that a recommendation for a cultural resource inventory is unwarranted at this time. However, should structures need to be altered or if cultural materials be inadvertently discovered during this project we would ask that our office be contacted and the site investigated. If you have any further questions or comments you may contact me at (406)444-7767 or by e-mail at dmurdo@mt.gov. I have attached an invoice for the file search. Thank you for consulting with us. Sincerely, v Damon Murdo Cultural Records Manager State Historic Preservation Office 225 North Roberts Street •. P.0.Box 201201 File: LOCAL/SUBDIVISIONS/2012 Helena,MT 59620-1201 (06)444-2694 (4o6)444-2696 FAX montanaliistoricalsocietyorg TM Michael A Cech,P.E. Bozeman Area o estern Manager of Construction 121 East Griffin Drive • Telephone:(406)582-4615 Bozeman,Montana 59716 Enerav Cellular:(406)581-2816 Facsimile:406-585-9634 Fax:(406)585-9634 mike.ceeh@,tiorthwestern.com vrww.northwesternenerpv.com December 26, 2012 C&H Engineering & Surveying Attn. Matt Cotterman, PE, PLS 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Proposed Ellis View Subdivision Matt, Regarding your letter of December 12, 2012, Northwestern Energy is willing and able to provide service to the proposed Ellis View Subdivision, in Bozeman. These services can be provided in accordance with applicable Montana Public Services rules and regulations and the current Northwestern Energy tariff schedule. Northwestern Energy shall determine the locations of all transformers and underground lines and equipment to provide for maintenance and installation. These facilities shall be located on front lot lines or rear lot lines along designated alley ways. We also would require all adequate • & appropriate utility easements along lot lines and roads in accordance with common subdivision design practices. Natural gas service is also available in this area, and installation of electric and gas service to this proposed development shouldn't impact service to existing facilities in this area. Please call me if you have any questions or concerns at 582-4615, also, we require having a copy of the approved plat of this proposed area prior to providing a cost to bring in these services. If installation is required prior to approval of the plat, it will be your responsibility to keep us informed of any changes which would alter our utility design and installation. Sincerely, p� Michael j. Cech, PE Manager of Construction Bozemar, Division • ! Bozeman Public Schools Kevin Barre 404 West Main, PO Box 520 Director of Facilities, OCR • Bozeman, MT 59771-0520 Voice: (406) 522-6009 www.bsd7.org Fax: (406) 522-6018 ' Kevin.Barre@bsd7.org December 17, 2012 Matthew Cotterman, P.E., P.L.S. C&H Engineering and Surveying 1091 Stoneridge Drive Bozeman, Montana, 59718 Subject: Proposed Ellis View Estates Subdivision (11489) Dear Mr. Cotterman: Please reference your letter dated December 12, 2012, concerning the subject development. We would expect that 9 additional housing units would generate the following students: ♦ Pre-K-5 2 Students ♦ 6-8 1 Student ♦ 9-12 1 Student • As of this date, the proposed development will be in the Morning Star Elementary School, Sacajawea Middle School and Bozeman High School attendance areas. Morning Star Elementary School is currently at capacity which could require the K-5 students to attend a different elementary school. Additionally, the current construction of Elementary School #8 may result in changes to the existing elementary school boundaries affecting the school attendance area covering your proposed development. Our existing bus system can accommodate the estimated number of additional students. A • AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM • PrelinunaryPlat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the City of Bozeman Pro'ect Name: ,2o�c�Q. (/l�ei7 �g� Date Preliminary Plat Prepared: a. J Reviewer's Name: 1` &� 4C Title: e Reviewer's Address: �10-11 Phone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: Agency. ❑ Montana Fish,Vrldlife and Parks ❑ AT8ff Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Qwest Bozeman School District##7 ❑ U.S.Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Company ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline Company ❑ Other: Comments: • 1. ❑ I have reviewed the attached:preliminary plat, and have no comments. 2. 1 have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have the following comments: r Signature: Date: ?' Please attach a reduced copy(81/2- by 11•inch or 11- by 17-inch) of the preliminary plat you reviewed. (Prepared 11-15-02) AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENT FORM • Preliminary Plat Applications for Proposed Subdivisions within the City of Bozeman .Project Name: &U5 V/LtJ t"67—A 6S Date Preliminary Plat Prepared: Reviewer's Name: zAj1 14,o L�- Title: c.5R— C A16 w6"Ke Reviewer's Address: 2.7 07 Lk), A461AI 5_7 , Phone Number: �/D(, �85 - 235,E Fax Number: E-mail Address: e 77/ L o Agency: ❑ Montana Fish,Wildlife and Parks ❑ AT&T Broadband ❑ State Historic Preservation Office ❑ _Qw;es e rA17 ff eV Ll A.1k ❑ Bozeman School District#7 ❑ U.S.Postal Service ❑ Northwestern Energy Company ❑ Yellowstone Pipeline Company ❑ Other: Comments: • 1. ❑ I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have no comments. 2. I have reviewed the attached preliminary plat, and have the following comments: -Ta FP_6V1P6 5�5P_Vllr_6 7a u)oo t-o P2&r-r-Pe- A F2onJeT_ L-o-F 07-f t-t-Tv 6A_<�c_N1EAJ—[ . Signature: Date: 2-1 / ?J /_ _ • Please attach a reduced copy(81/2- by 11-inch or 11- by 17-inch) of the preliminary platyou reviewed. (Prepared 11-15-02) s • D -a -a a x T • APPENDIX F NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN +f t • MEMO TO: Matt Cotterman C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. FROM: John Ansley Gallatin County Weed District DATE: March 27, 2013 RE: Ellis View Estates Subdivision Please find enclosed a copy of the approved Weed Management Plan for Ellis View Estates • Subdivision. The Noxious Weed Management Plan has been approved with the following terms and conditions. The proposed area has been a complaint site for Canada thistle in past years. Hoary alyssum was found on the NE portion of property along Good Medicine Way. Noxious weeds shall be treated by July 1 of each year, with a follow-up treatment in the fall by October 15 of each year (if needed). If you have any questions, please call me at 582-3265. Thank you. John Ansley, Coordinator Gallatin County Weed District • 901 N. Black Bozeman, MT 59715 (406) 582-3265 FAX: 582-3273 RECEIVED w 1�1�k1\ [.'U 2� • Date Peceived NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 This plan is valid and effective upon approval by the Board or it's Representative for 3 years from date of approval. The Landowner/Responsible Party agrees that the Board shall have the right to revise this plan and any Memorandum of Understanding as necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Gallatin County Weed Management Plan or Montana Noxious Weed Control Act. If a new Landowner/Responsible Party becomes involved before expiration of this plan, the new Landowner/Responsible Party must submit a new Weed Management Plan for approval by the Weed District. The Landowner/Responsible Party will provide documentation that the Weed Management Plan has been implemented. The property owner agrees that the Weed District may inspect the property prior to granting approval of the Weed Management Plan, and if approved, such reasonable inspections as necessary to determine compliance with this plan. Weed Management Plans that have expired require a submittal of a new Weed Management Plan and documentation of completed weed control efforts. A property inspection is mandatory • for reviewing the plan. There is a Review Fee of $300 for a Major Subdivision and $150 for a Minor Subdivision. These fees also apply to applications for Extensions of Preliminary Plat. Landowner/Responsible Party agrees to comply with this plan. CHECK TYPE OF WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN (check all that apply) C✓] Subdivision [] Telecommunications (cell tower) [] Roadside Maintenance (no spray) [� Landowner [] Organic Farm/Ranch Gravel Pit (attach MT DEQ Plan of Operation) I have read and understand all the relevant sections of the Gallatin County Weed Management Plan. Signature • SubWMP-08112 Page 1 of 5 • RESPONSIBLE PARTY INFORMATION Name: Mahar Montana Homes Phone: (541)261-3031 Mailing Address: 1627 W. Main Street, #370, Bozeman, MT 59718 Email Address: joe@maharhomesmt.com PROJECT LOCATION with Legal Description (Attach plat/project map) Lot 4A, Minor Subdivision No. 35C, located in the NE 1/4, Section 25, T.2S., R.5E. 3601 Good Medicine Way PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please complete all that apply) Project Name: Ellis View Estates Subdivision Number of Lots: 9 Total Acres in Project: 5.01 Total Road Miles in Project: 360 If of alley • NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN Noxious Weed Species on Property (Provide plat map with weed inventory) Canadian Thistle and Bull Thistle/ _ CaH Iii « -z ljl� ?-�e — Sc4z7�4cbC!cf ove-- r4rof4 7I7/ /� _. 5�I ti A !r oIa A 74 T'7—' METHOD OF WEED CONTROL (Mark all that apply) Ev(ICHEMICAL ❑MECHANICAL (CULTURAL ❑BIOLOGICAL Describe specific control measures and timing of control for 3 years. (If using herbicides, include type of herbicide and rates) Attach additional pages if necessary/incorporate by reference. Chemical spray with boom truck. Use Curtail at 2 quarts/acre. Apply herbicides in the spring of the year, after the plants have fully emerged, but still actively growing, and prior to bud stage. — 11 4"Zr g/,of A. Y�eaN-r �'��ccl� �v a �se�tct�4(s/>hass � hrr �e c�fec� J�~•/ QC!•e! Pe I- AC I-r- a « v e.41 L*C/y L--/ Cry Ae A)1. &too e-a io/to s ur•-�At r� . SubWMP-08112 Page 2 of 5 • ESTIMATED COSTS OF WEED CONTROL FOR 3 YEARS (Specify cost for each year) Indicate if work will be done by self or contracted: ❑Self [Z]Contracted Year Herbicide Cost Cultural/ Biological Cost Mechanical Cost 1 599-60 o n a 2 7D° [ 3 39949W ° Total / ° $0A00 $0.00 REVEGETATION PLAN Are any disturbances planned? [ Yes []No If Yes, complete the following re-vegetation section: MANDATORY REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS: Areas disturbed during subdivision development (road construction, pond construction, service/utility/gas/electricitelephone line installation) will have a layer of topsoil redistributed onto disturbed areas. Disturbed areas will be seeded to an appropriate grass seed mix for the site. During the first and second years of grass establishment, areas seeded to grass will be mowed as appropriate to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. • PLANNED DISTURBANCES (Mark all that apply) Z Utility/Service line L !Pond LvJ Road Park ov( Trail []Central Septic Other (list type) Home construction Describe in detail, the revegetation to mitigate all disturbances that will occur on this property. (List type and amount of seed/sod, seeding methods and timing, and fertilization) Attach additional pages if necessary/incorporate by reference. Disturbed lot areas and boulevard strips will require a 6"layer of topsoil be distributed over the disturbed area. The final surface shall be smooth and shallow roughened for seed catchment. Rocks greater than 1"diameter shall be removed by mechanical means. Disturbed areas shall be sodded or seeded or at a rate to establish a minimum of one pure live seed per square inch. Adequate irrigation shall be provided for turf grass establishment: Fertilize all seeding once seed is germinated with 17-17-17 at a rate of 2.5 pounds per 1000 sq feet. Overseed with appropriate mix at the start of the second year as needed to ensure even stand establishment. SubWMP-08112 Page 3 of 5 • • II ESTIMATED COSTS OF REVEGETATION FOR 3 YEARS (Specify cost for each year) Indicate if work will be done by self or contracted: ❑Self [✓]Contracted i Year Revegetation Cost 8,000.00 2 8,000.00 3 8,000.00 Total $24;000.00. PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS THAT APPLY: GRAVEL SOURCE (if using outside supply of gravel) List source of gravel/pit run/road mix/topsoil/etc, brought on-site for disturbance mitigation and/or construction. Name of Gravel Pit: Gravel will be locally sourced from established suppliers Location: likely Belgrade • Contact Person: Does source of material have an approved Weed Management and Revegetation Plan on file with the Weed District? W1 Yes No ORGANIC CERTIFICATION ORGANIZATION (for Organic Farm/Ranch only) Organic Farm/Ranch Certification Organization: Contact Person: Phone Number: Mailing Address: Email: LANDOWNER MAINTENANCE (only applies to Roadside Maintenance) The LANDOWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY has read the relevant sections of the Gallatin County Weed Management Plan and realizes that the WEED DISTRICT is released of liability for any losses suffered by the LANDOWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY in managing noxious isweeds on the County road right-of-way. (initial) SubWMP-08112 Page 4 of 5 STATUS ,APPROVED 0 NOT APPROVED RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS: i�vl,�e CL $�,�tv� GJG�S a..�So 1;�pX cr►1 �vr�cri�, ��� Additional terms and conditions apply—see attached Compliance with laws and regulations. LANDOWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY has an affirmative duty to take notice of, observe, and strictly comply with all existing laws, rules and regulations and any laws, rules and regulations that may be adopted after the date of this agreement. Whether or not the same are expressly stated in the agreement, the LANDOWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY shall strictly comply with all applicable state, federal and local laws and regulations. LANDOWNER/RESPONSIBLE PARTY agrees that this plan is supported by good valid consideration and this plan con 'tutes - bin ing contract and may be enforced as such. Sign re of Weed Board Chairma epresentati Signature of Responsible Party v Type/print name of Chairma Repres ativ .. Type/print name of Responsible Party 2� Z(0 Date Date Signature of Landowner Type/print name of Landowner Z Date • Sub WMP-08112 Page 5 of 5 / / ( „r., ? i r # t_ t +s�I ,4f u r �,, •�' r Y.iiiiPP�' n. .�` u � �r - t��. i.t .+ !.7 T 3i�'trrF��t r f 'r •Ys - }•'� '7 s ra. . G i �rh ht ��!" val I � r.�' �' '� 'y' .s�'SY� 'r r+�}+`7 t: r s'`�`i rl J� r ��Sl, r �s' * .• '� '•7,L� jy� �� + � �r;y��A r s ryi:d+,, �>.33•+ x' � r; � y ��2�,� •.: �tS i ,e �a • i .:� �� r � .-�F a�"-;�i+is ?S�v :4� � � i G fir; - r ` - c � �� ^pit 3 r•l� r I :f ',. 4 r. +" d '`• �! #- ' .-`,� -r -_.s fry „µ. �•%n �'�,� fa rM r+-:l� I '�, L .i`7f d 1�.�: Yi' 2 r+q � a.iai'�`��• -""`itl 11w.^..J 1 � .,'•ur a�,.,••'°N,.,�.._t_ 1 ?: "`"_�..F' s Y-r..Jµ � _ irp. �' /Tv '•°y.� :.a � µ�rY} 1�;, X: �-� ��� �"`•Yr•�`St QQQ h }cy rltfij i .+-•Jl � - 5 :+ C a �� ,7 y ti 1 `� � ' G �$ f �� fir. 17. 3-.' Tr`aJ5 s�S iK of a'�' /{"J" �a_pa� �,'� N*� --+.sx ��{ .- ` ,h, 1 -• �e�- '•>'s i =t 'rt'7 f�T• _a d_,y. _ s-h r 7• W in p , :a ♦ !" r. + ��i } .T ?. '>� .� ss'` ) ._J^P^{'f.,� s �t' }. l,cr 41 T ! T ��;•i M t �cJi r' � i „p" q.y x,.q, �i�� �+'� -�. y '=° tp;A 'r C y a rl .y 'MPj, 'a�''. .r • vv r+� 4 •t it '� � ~ 3 i{i5� �. S�, l 3 .. ,.{.y.[� �" � t 'J -'. I v 4S ��t'7' 14,fy t n i ?` L f t >3J- -a.. 1! riu' ,a -•.+_�.n'_+vY.�.. -`�r vS$ M.y {� � Gr ,t t -'L t 7 yf .. �� Ny ••:� � q.i x+.j9 rr3 S.n n --r:+� .1�* ;i ,C .c'• r T. .a^7, r_ ..! � +�° ±� +�'t!' } t sa� r th����� �� 3 fiY _ } r °j � �. �' � '• t-'�n ''z;�. ya p- t.��. 7 ��� � 1 Y!, �Y. '��•. a'r�il t� '4�,df 1x•\ 1i� ^+- � •'a"'4 ri1. 1I ir' � .r!'- 1 G Y rMJ t/Y rl _ •{r','~ t,'a _;F �.11„ >Y f 5 1 (r . iw. 5 t .° 'tt r'4 �/ �,,.• � +i• �y.' ♦ > J J Z:: u 7.,'•'T.t t }..{- .a..1 y�' Ilk.c r*�A `.-"•'•'- r ,.p�°C-�.). r.r }i ��y �• ,kv aa. t+^ ��f Tom ..\_ �� tr"ii..y+" It 1 r .2 'a a ._ CC y s, ^ rF/ 1 "/•�"^• �•y y la1 SJ f 'fy:� .� v f> r, �5•'a.k d��"�� -rr'i c ° _- a h `��Lr1� ��✓-- '-„_ _ t 0+ ��t r��`��•'�'^4 ❑ FJ�' r.y,+71�•e� . ,'•K,�.•1:?'. "'S` ':/''�tw,.{z" ° �S' r J 4 1[{� ._ _ f J r {�3 a � .S.I .�iJ �. }�i )�'; •+'a ._•./ � .jr }� .! t 1��,i.. - fM'r i >i .i � �r s j� „a.i n �. !y. � i �1�:, ..r'f f t ,� � :In �± x.•'Py'. !fT 1 r',!� ' �• _ t -+• i,y4�t ��-�u alb.F.. . . �• ��'<-�� �„d.,,°�.>'�' x�� r 0 7 . r_ M' •'.F.r f'`{ _ ,�•� r.: .. •ti y. .3 !fl f'^J� ':';�•' " t f,; of �f ati s fl - t:;v � '.i ,t tii{f �. , Cl:, ral •Fi 5 !'7 1 r!h .•1! a : 1.. i. i' y" y! c ! rv, ' rX, X z � � � '"� s ijL :; y� y��-'i *• .• s t r � .i J s 1� � D / + ;i�'•• � % c slSi. �-f r �4y+1 r f!� ` ..a+ � ,r, �.��`t'��,nh�s „•TS ...i.: •.iC li. `1 � F"} - - H�"t L xf//S _?y}, ,ylf..,� ? Si ��y.a-. ..� ,,.a. � �1� •1 Ril •'�i r T s.,, ri s^i,.�it g ij ¢t• yi j ,.7'Jr a� ''r�1 �f a, y� t'fib - 1�J` =jf Y m Sq'F � 'f t. + �� �at, '41a'[j .•'r - tJ�J: !'~'• �5 E1 Jt r Y� � � KT t G` i l •r. o �t. .r � p �, ��1 LJ ..-+ t�'r Ls. shy 7 .••. ... 7� IP , ��f9 .e,._.y j��.�..r' ...•�: xj_ :.. ��../j : �,, .t., x �; 1-i Sh y: c''Qj�+ •" .•!�p �url �p v `K• j 'FS � fr � -. t F ',f''�.>�?• �y i`'( '4 v ,n, y� �•� i t,t .s 1/�, � 1 ,,� 2 :'" h; x ,St ` t n*`p� 5 E', flu X }alb -��� a� / ! ��' 4`'rt'� r� :5 ..k. ,, �i- yr}' ; ,ti i it,.y aj ft�' f a� '�1• `6� 1�� 'il ,7,r�i .. �� ��i•y y L F a �S.�.t•:r•1 .. .5 }• lz Cr i t + .� rT,-w T }�` I�l•a.l� 4,�a.: Y • 1717412wil • • — • 1 , i'a i a �° P a', i•5 "�.� r r `., _ � -.!y ,Y {A-'l� �17.`,ke 12, ' P • 2�5 + -Fr .wT-•. .e•H�Yt -{. ei.1�;"+"+,. r. �� "I y 47a LS , ;'�'�� }a.��`k(` Y'.'ir ':' ._4...a_ ..a....._ t� a?3+ _ �.rssa- •'F� .,r ,t�� 4 rr�f{��>s�� �1"„i t"�in SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO f=Mff"MWAIRV M.AT' CW CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELL VIEW ESTATES S 'JBDlVISION LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF RECORD BEING AN MENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35—A ER: MAHAR MONTANA HOMES LOCATED IN THE NE 114, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA EXISTING ZONING: R- COUNTY) \ \\ L O f 1 Z '\ - \ \ REARRANGEMENT OF 1 ' AREA TABULATION _ -'� rUBDIV. \ OT 3 LOT AREA = 121,070 SO FT - 55% I Lnd. Gaston YPC L \ NO. 8—B OF SOURDOUGH \ / ' PARKLAND = 18,184 SO FT - 89 Fnd. Gaston YPC MINOR SUB NO. 35—A \ \ �� OPEN SPACE = 38.362 SO FT- 18% CREEK PROPERTIES PUBLIC STREETS = 40.634 SO FT - 199 ,,.,.:;_..--r...:....., -.. ........._ .._...�--�' w . ement \ 0 Ide Utility Eas[N89'40'OO"E] -TOTAL AREA = 218,250 SQ FT i ` +:r PARKLAND REQUIRED = 11.761 SO FT OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 24,214SOFT 696g' ;, I r - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - 6� N; co OPEN-•..SPAC..._ 42.67 93:7S-8i3'40'00'�--.._`._'-_-.-.--._ ...34 519 Sq - Roe / 1 Lr) N Ie•w 8' 8"W W \ �r 89• \ p / :.,y:; y`\lam �• /� \ 16 LLJ JsmT ' ii a12. ® DITCH °Bao ` � 10.15i 54 Ft IJ ; , 12.5' WIDE,PUBLIC ACCESS t ,� ' !'I AND UTILITY,. EASE ENT PER �\� • M '® �+��j�l MINOR SUBDIVISION No. 35Bcf) G • UJI {, ! . ! 1 )\ o � - \ ` �� c'L UG�` GAS/ SIGN C c O s \ 10.4 T FtJ� �T LOT 9 n ` 0 8 O P 9 IS L I Qyi i!vi ? n u 12.944 Sq Ft n {"� Sq Ft ems;) ❑4A`+� e-LAJ v UNPLATTED I q Sri i ; . . . : p�o0. 0" \ GOLDENSTEIN Q \ \ ' LIMITED '�'; -r Z 4 Set C&H IRP6, : \ �8" Rebor I ; o_ 90.18 090•oo'o0' 126.75 09aa0•o0^ PARTNERSHIP I ' Li9 `ni�:`o ss LOT 3 \ o ZOoYlOYL�r I7-ia I i o o\ \ `:13.758 Sq Ft Od \\ (CITY) TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CUL-DE-SAC;PER I� II;p N �--� •t MINOR SUBDIVISION No. \ ti - f `t7 a 1n \ \ LOT 6 LOT 35B BT32'30 ii �25` \o OPEN SPACE 14,034 Sq Ft o 16,883 I J :D] a ........_......_� o 1 O � •( ; � � . I , ; . 3 ? _; LOT 4 \ RIM 51 16,e Sq Ft \ FL E=- r� FL NW; ..... i 544 r ( H! ^.! L=26.24 C=5.59'10" ...•`, -�/l,/ / i , \ \ i f ; : /ill! C=8'31'06 `.r-•`.'. 7 ! r!i°' --------`5380-89'40'0 .f%f/•/ .Sy ,yam 17' ` \ Scale In Feet 1 �� it !+ 'r'Ii L1, 27' tl w_� 0 sy 1usss f;" I 60 60 ,'j(I. a=13.27's8" '` -tlgs0 w B'�+ -- i a \ ff - ._..... B' I I 8 b' i t-.!•"*+ter � -- '' • ati � --.:�?� \ 8 O 18 oo iB —�'• -- � _ ----"-: .r LOT 5' + �-` F.n+53.80 89'40'00" \ ,��.• ."Scale In Meters it JLn -- \?� ,3,17a sq%Ft pEd SP E 2 -- �I w PARK i 34.51 P` !?._.MAIL \ J i I Ss ;.` 'r =i•!�' "u__B^ss` Lfi8 18.184 Sq Ft — / 0 ER CAT . D IV Y Ld LON d >' Wide UtiIit Easement y PROPOSED 30' r T f e'S5 �,•:/ \ oo' per Minor Subdivision No. 35-A \\.' SEWER EASEMENI _ l v�;s"ss-woasB-3gsab°oiB..S — — :: — / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — dN ; — — � ' �,., ycf�`' Fnd. RPC :No. 1� r „ ? [S89 00 :.. ...,;. ; . . Fnd. Gaston YPC En inet=rin and Surveying Inc. ` '! 9 9 Y 9 d. Gaston YPC ''~... 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman,MT 59718 .}. ' f` nd. RPC No. 3111 ES Phone(406)587-1115•Fax 1406)587-9768 / / OPEN J P A C E t ' POINT OF BEGINNING www.chengineers.com 9 info@chengineers.com Sheet I Of �� s� ^^` 6 de Trail #1148! • D 'o -a CL X. • APPENDIX G COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION • RETURN AFTER RECORDING: Mahar Montana Homes 1627 West Main Street, Suite 370 Bozeman, MT 59715 DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR ELLIS VIEW ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THIS DECLARATION is made this day of , 201_, by Mahar Montana Homes, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant". WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of real property situated in. the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; • WHEREAS Declarant intends to develop, sell and cone the above-described Y real property, hereinafter referred to as "Ellis View Estates"; and,. WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject all of said real property, together with the Lots contained therein to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein set forth and referred to as "Covenants"; NOW THEREFORE, Declarant does hereby establish, dedicate, declare, publish and impose upon the property the following Protective Covenants and Restrictions which shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and be for the benefit of all persons claiming such property, their grantors, legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, and shall be for the purpose of maintaining a uniform and stable value, character, architectural design use, and development of the property. Such Covenants shall apply to the entire property, and all improvements placed or erected thereon, unless otherwise specifically excepted herein. The Covenants shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, Lot or division. Said Covenants shall be as follows: ARTICLE I -DEFINITIONS Section 1. "Association" shall mean the Ellis View Estates Homeowners' • Association; its successors and assigns. The Association may be incorporated as a 1 • 0 • Montana nonprofit corporation,with its members as the Lot owners. Section 2. "Covenants" shall mean this Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development, and as it may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. Section 3. "Declarant" shall mean Mahar Montana Homes, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company, and its successors and assigns, located at 1627 West Main Street, Suite 370,Bozeman, Montana 59715 Section 4. "Declaration" shall mean this Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Ellis View Estates and as it may, from time to time, be amended or supplemented. Section 5. "Directors" or "Board of Directors" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Association, and shall consist of at least three, but not more than seven, Lot Owners who shall be elected at the annual meeting by a simple majority of the Members of the Association. The Board of Directors shall be elected for a term set by a simple majority of the membership, but not less than one year. Any vacancy in the Board of Directors occurring before the next annual meeting of the Members shall be filled by the remaining Directors. Until 75% of the Lots in Ellis View Estates, as described on Exhibit A, have been sold, the • Declarant shall have the right to appoint the Board of Directors, who shall not be required to be Lot Owners or Members of the Association. Section 6. "Ellis View Estates Architectural Committee" shall mean the Committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Ellis View Estates Homeowners' Association, whose function is to review and approve or disapprove plans, specifications, designs, landscaping, sites, and locations of improvements to be constructed within the Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. Section 7. "Improvement(s)" shall include, but is not limited to, all buildings, outbuildings, stairs, decks, structures,bridges, roads, trails, pathways, driveways, parking areas, fences, screening walls and barriers, hedges, windbreaks, plantings, trees, shrubs, retaining walls, yard and lawn ornaments of artwork, tree houses, solar panels, water lines, sewer lines, electrical, gas, telephone and intereet transmission lines, cable television, television and radio transmission facilities, dishes, towers,poles, signs, and all other structures, installations and landscaping of every type and kind, whether above or below the land surface. Section 8. "Lots" or "Properties" shall mean and refer to all real property herein described and platted into Lots as Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development according to the official plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County,Montana. • Section 9. "Lot Owners" or "Owner" shall mean and refer to any person or entity, whether one or more.persons or entities, owning a fee simple title to or interest in a Lot or 2 0 • • a contract purchaser, whether one or more persons or entities, owning or purchasing a Lot, but excluding those having a mortgage or an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation; provided, however, that prior to the first conveyance of a Lot for value, the term "Owner" shall mean "Declarant" or its successors or assigns. The term "contract purchaser" shall mean a person buying a Lot pursuant to a contract for deed, Montana Trust Indenture or mortgage. The term "person" hereinafter shall include any person, persons or entities. Section 10. "Member" shall mean any Lot Owner or Owner. Each Member or Lot Owner agrees to abide and be bound by these Covenants, the Articles of Incorporation, and the Bylaws and the Resolutions of the Homeowners' Association, if any. Section 11. "Open Space" means those areas set aside for the use of the Lot Owners and the public, including roads, trails, easements, boulevards, storm water retention areas, parks, and parkways. Section 12. "P.U.D." shall mean the proposed Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. Section 13. "Zoning Regulation" shall mean and refer to the City of Bozeman Zoning Regulations or ordinances and any and all amendments thereto. • Section 14. Other definitions may be found throughout these Covenants and those definitions are binding upon all Owners. Any term not specifically deemed shall be deemed to have a common and ordinary meaning. ARTICLE II-PROPERTY USE AND CITY REQUIRED COVENANTS Section 1. Every owner shall have a right to use the common areas, parks., trails, and roads as shown on the plat for Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development, subject to the following: A. The right of the Association to provide reasonable restrictions on the use of the common areas, trails, parks, and roads for the overall benefit of the Association and its members, including limitations on the number of guests permitted to use the common areas, and restrictions or prohibitions on the type of activity and use, including, but not limited to, the use of firearms, fireworks, motor driven vehicles, roller blades or skates, skate boards, scooters, bicycles, loud music and loud parties in the parks or common areas. B. The right of the Association to charge reasonable fees for the disproportionate use by owners or others of, or for use of specialized recreational or other facilities situated on, the parks or common areas. C. Owners and guests shall not harass wildlife, and should avoid ar-.as of wildlife concentration. Loud, offensive, or other behavior which harasses or frightens • wildlife in parks, common areas, and open space is prohibited. 3 • Section 2. Each Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of all sidewalks, boulevards, parking areas, driveways, walkways, and landscaping of their Lot, and shall at all times keep the Lot, and the buildings, improvements, and appurtenances thereon in a safe and clean condition. All landscaping and boulevards shall be maintained, watered, trimmed, mowed, controlled for weeds, and replaced as necessary so as not to detract from the general appearance of the P.U.D. and the neighboring properties in the opinion of the Architectural Committee. In the event that maintenance, repair, or weed control is caused or necessitated through the willful or negligent act of any owner, or their guests, invitees, agents or contractors, and such maintenance, repair, or weed control is completed by the Association after reasonable notice to the Owner, the cost of such maintenance or repairs shall be added to and become a part of the assessment to which such Lot is subject. Maintenance and repair caused by willful or negligent acts of Owners shall include, but not be limited to, maintenance and repairs required as a result of utility installation or repairs, or other actions of contractors or agents of the Owner, performed outside the boundary of the Lot. Section 3. Every Lot owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the sidewalk located on, adjacent to and between the Owner's Lot and the nearest right-of-way. • Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to snow and ice removal as required by the City of Bozeman. It shall also be the responsibility of each Lot owner to maintain their own driveways from the edge of the paved street or alley to their own garage. The boulevards, rights-of-way, and ditches are to be mowed and maintained by the Lot owner on their Lot, and by the Association in common areas. Boulevards, rights-of- way, and ditches may not be blocked or filled. Section 4. No noxious odors or offensive activity shall take place upon any portion of the P.U.D or Lots, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be, or may become, an annoyance to the neighborhood. Section 5. No hunting of, shooting at or harassing of birds, animals or any wildlife will be permitted in the P.U.D. Skunks, gophers and rodents may be trapped; however, poison may not be used. Section 6. No livestock, poultry, or other animals, except domestic dogs and cats, or small in-house pets and birds, are permitted on the Lots. Dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept in reasonable numbers, provided they are confined to the Lot of their Owner. Household pets may not be kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purposes. Pets shall not be allowed to roam free, and shall be restrained.or leashed at all times. Pets shall not be allowed to become a nuisance or annoyance to neighboring property owners, nor allowed to bark continuously or uncontrolled at any time. Owners are responsible for cleaning up after their pets on any neighboring properties, and on all boulevards,parks,trails,and common areas. • 4 All dos cats and other pets shall be strictly controlled b their Owners to prevent an • g � p Y Y p Y interference or harassment of wild birds or animals in the P.U.D. or on surrounding or adjacent properties. If any animals are caught or identified chasing or otherwise harassing wildlife or people, or have become a nuisance or annoyance to neighboring property owners, the Association or any Owner shall have the authority to have such animal or animals impounded in accordance with the City of Bozeman animal control regulations. All animals shall be further subject to the provisions of the Ellis View Estates Management Plan, and subject such rules and regulations as may be adopted by the Association, which may reduce the allowable number, restrict the type of pet, or require that such pets be confined indoors. Section 7. No signs shall be erected on the common areas, parks, or open space, or on any privately owned Lot within the P.U.D., except as follows: A. One address or family name sign shall be allowed to identify the Owner of the property. Such identification signs shall be limited to a maximum of two square feet of surface area, and must be attached to the principal residence. Any such signs shall comply with the City of Bozeman zoning and sign regulations. B. One temporary "For Sale" sign shall be allowed for a home or Lot being sold, provided it is promptly removed when the home or Lot is sold. • C. During the time that the P.U.D. is being developed and Lots are being sold, the Declarant may erect "Lots For Sale" type:signs in accordance with the City of Bozeman zoning and sign regulations. D. A sign may be placed at the entrance(s) to the P.U.D. to identify the P.U.D., and directory signs may be placed within the common areas, parks, trails, or open. spaces, as may be approved by the Board of Directors. Directory signs should be combined with landscaping features, be made of natural appearing materials, and must comply with the provisions of the City of Bozeman zoning and sign regulations. Section 8. Individual mail boxes will not be allowed, and no newspaper delivery tubes will be allowed in the P.U.D. Community mail boxes will be clustered at strategic locations approved by the Postmaster to simplify mail delivery, and such boxes shall be maintained by the Association. No parking will be allowed in front of the mailbox clusters. Section 9. All garbage, trash, and rubbish shall be regularly removed from the Lot, and shall not be allowed to accumulate. All solid waste containers must be stored out of view except during reasonable periods prior to and after pick-up, and only on the day of pick-up. Section 10. No pickup camper, camping trailer, snowmobile, boat, trailer, motor home, motorcycle, four-wheeler, ATV, or any type of vehicle or similar item used for 5 i • recreational purposes shall be used for habitation, and may not be placed or left upon a Lot, driveway, street, or alley, for a period of longer than fourteen (14) days in a calendar year unless it is stored in an attached, enclosed structure which is aesthetically acceptable to the Architectural Committee, and is not visible from other Lots, neighboring properties, sidewalks, or streets. Section 11. No temporary structures, trailers, campers, motor homes, tents, or similar structures shall be used as a residence on any Lot. Section 12. All recreational and play equipment, including but not limited to, swing sets, play houses, tee-pees, trampolines, and tennis or badminton nets, shall be limited to back yard areas, shall be inconspicuous and screened from neighboring and street views, and shall be limited in use so as not to be offensive to neighboring properties or common areas. Section 13. All holiday-type decorations, including but not limited to, lights, decorations, and ornaments for structures, lawns, trees, or windows, shall not be put up, installed, or lighted more than 30 days prior to the designated calendar date for the applicable holiday, and must be taken down and removed within 30 days after the designated calendar date for the applicable holiday. Section 14. There are reserved, as shown in the plat and as may otherwise be reserved, easements for the purposes of constructing, operating, maintaining, • enlarging, reducing, removing, laying or relaying lines and related facilities and equipment for utilities, including, but not limited to, those providing gas, communication and electrical power. Fencing, hedges and other items allowed by the Covenants may be placed along and in the easements as long as the .intended use of such easements are not prevented. Section 15. City sewer and water lines, power, natural gas, cable television, and telephone primary service lines are provided to each Lot. However, each Lot owner is responsible for the costs of connecting to the main utility lines to the Lot improvements from the primary line near the Lot, including any additions to the primary line that may be required by the location of the improvements on the Lot. All utility lines shall be underground. Section 16. All zoning, land use regulations and all other laws, rules and regulations of any government or agency under whose jurisdiction the land lies are considered to be part of these Covenants and enforceable hereunder; and all of the Owners of said lands and Lots shall be bound by such laws, rules and regulations. In the event there is a conflict between the Covenants and the applicable zoning, the most restrictive provision of either the Covenants or the zoning shall control. ARTICLE III.— ELLIS VIEW ESTATES HOMEOWNERS'ASSOCIATION • Section 1. An association is hereby established known as "Ellis View Estates 6 i 0 • Homeowners' Association," (hereinafter referred to as the "Association"), for the purpose of enforcing these Covenants and operating the Association for the benefit of all members therein. The initial address of the Association shall be 1627 West Main, #370, Bozeman, MT 59715. The address of the Association may be changed by the Board of Directors upon notice to the Owners. Section 2. Every owner or contract purchaser of a Lot shall. be a Member of the Alder Creek Homeowners' Association. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separate from the ownership of any Lot. Each Owner shall be responsible for advising the Association of their acquisition of ownership, of their mailing address, and of any changes of ownership or mailing address. Members shall be entitled to one vote for each Lot owned. Multiple owners of a single Lot shall have one such membership or voting interest between them. If more than one Lot is owned, the Owner or Owners thereof shall have one membership or voting interest for each separate Lot owned. Section 3. For the purpose of determining membership, at any meeting a person or entity shall be deemed to be a Member upon the recording of a duly executed deed to that Owner, or upon the recording of a Notice of Purchaser's Interest or an Abstract of Contract for Deed showing a contract purchase by an Owner. The legal title retained by the original seller selling under a contract for deed shall not qualify such • original seller for membership. Foreclosure of a mortgage, trust indenture or the termination or foreclosure of a contract for deed wherein title is vested in the mortgage, beneficiary or original seller on a contract, or repossession for any reason of a Lot or unit sold under a contract shall tenninate the vendee's membership, whereupon all rights to such membership shall vest in the legal owner. Section 4. The annual meeting of the Association shall be set at a time and place determined and noticed by the Board of Directors. Any special meetings may be called by the President, or in the absence of the President, by the Vice-President. In addition, a special meeting shall be held upon call of 25% of the Owners. Special meetings shall require 48 hours' notice, in writing. Notice of annual and special meetings shall be mailed to Owners at the address for each Owner as provided pursuant to Section 2 of this Article. The presence of Members, in person or by written proxy, representing 55% of the total votes of the membership shall constitute a quorum. At the annual meeting, the Members shall review and approve a budget for the next year, shall elect Directors to fill any expired term or vacant position, and shall conduct such other business as shall be reasonable or necessary to carry out the purpose of the Association. Section 5. The Members shall have the authority to set the number of Directors, • which number shall not be less than three nor more than seven. However, as set forth 7 • in Article I, Section 6, until at least 75% of the Lots have been sold, there shall be three Directors, and Declarant shall have the right to appoint the Board of Directors, who shall not be required to be Lot owners or Members of the Association. Section 6. The Board of Directors shall serve for a term to be set by a simple majority of the membership, which shall not be for less than one year. Each director shall serve until replaced by his or her successor. Any vacancy on the Board of Directors occurring before the next annual meeting of the Members shall be filled by the remaining directors. All Director meetings shall require the presence of Directors entitled to cast a minimum of 55% of all votes of the Directors. The presence of Directors entitled to cast 55% of all votes of the Directors shall constitute a quorum. The Directors shall act by majority vote. Section 7. The Board of Directors shall have the power and responsibility of acting on behalf of the Association and its Members as shall be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of the Association, including but not limited to take such actions as shall be necessary or reasonable to care for, protect and maintain the easements, park lands, open space, trails, boundary fences, common areas, community signs or identification; to enforce these Covenants; to set and collect assessments; to set annual and/or special meetings; and to act in any other matters set forth herein or • which may serve the development, including the formation of special imorovement districts, either public or private, for such improvements as the Association shall approve. The Directors shall have the authority to hire additional professional officers, management personnel or companies, consultants, accounting services, or any other personnel which they deem necessary for the smooth, efficient, and professional functioning of the Association. They may include, but not be limited to, a manager, secretary, treasurer, professional consultants, accountants, and maintenance personnel. The Directors shall also have the authority to make contractual arrangements with outside entities, including but no limited to attorneys, accountants, engineers, environmental consultants,. maintenance contractors, and building contractors to provide for the smooth, efficient, and professional functioning of the Association. Section 8. The annual meeting of the Board of Directors shall be held immediately after the annual meeting of the members. At the annual meeting, the Directors shall elect a President, Vice-President and Secretary-Treasurer for the Association from among the Directors, except that the Secretary-Treasurer may be a member who is not a Director. The officers of the Association shall follow the directions of the majority vote of.the Directors. Section 9. The duties of each of the offices shall be as follows: • A. President. The President shall preside over all meetings of the 8 • • • Association. The President shall call the membership together whenever necessary. The President shall be the general administrative and executive officer of the Association, and shall perform such duties as may be specified, and exercise such powers as may be delegated to the office of President by the Board of Directors. B. Vice-President. The Vice-President shall exercise the powers of the President in the absence of the President. C. Secretary-Treasurer. The Secretary shall give notice of all meetings of the Association, and shall keep a record of the proceedings of the meetings of the Association. The Secretary shall be authorized to sign on behalf of the Association, all records, documents and instruments when such are authorized to be signed by the Association. The Treasurer shall keep and maintain adequate and correct accounts of the accounts, properties, and business of the Association, including accounts of its.assets, liabilities, receipts, disbursements, gains and losses of the Association. The Treasurer shall prepare and report such periodic accountings as shall be required by the Association. Section 10. A vacancy in any office of the Association shall be filled by appointment by the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting or the successor • is duly appointed or elected. ARTICLE IV -ANNUAL AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Section 1. Assessments. Each Owner, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any deed or contract, is deemed to have agreed to these Covenants, and to pay to the Association: A. Annual assessments or changes; and, B. Special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided. The annual and special assessments, together with interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be a charge on the property and Lot, and shall be a continuing lien upon the property or Lot against which each such assessment is made. Each assessment, together with the interest, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, shall be the personal obligation of the Owner of such property or Lot at the time when the assessment are due. Section 2. Purpose of Assessments. • The assessments. levied by the Association shall be used to promote the recreation, 9 0 0 • health, safety, convenience and welfare of the Owners, for the improvement, repair and maintenance of roads, easements, trails, park lands, open space, mail boxes, community signs or identification, and community boulevard trees and landscaping within. the P.U.D., and for any other purposes, expressed or implied, in these Covenants. Community park land, open space, and boulevard trees and landscaping shall be watered, maintained, and replaced by the Association when necessary. Section 3. Amount and Approval of Assessments. The maximum assessment per Lot which may be made by the Association in every calendar year shall not substantially exceed the projected and budgeted actual and reasonable costs to be incurred by the Association during the coming year in carrying out the purposes herein set forth, and may include a reasonable reserve for contingencies. The amount of the annual assessments shall be fixed by the Board of Directors of the Association in the following manner: At each annual meeting of the Members of the Association, the Directors shall present a proposed budget of the estimated expenses for the Association for the coming year to the members for review, discussion, amendment, comment and approval. The Members shall approve or amend the proposed budget by a majority vote of the • members present or voting by proxy. After the annual meeting, the Board of Directors shall set the amount of the assessments and the date(s) due for the coming year to cover the budget approved in the manner herein set forth. Section 4. Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the annual assessments authorized above, the Association may levy special assessments for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction, reconstruction, or other capital improvements on the properties and open space, including fixtures and personal property related thereto, provided that any such assessment shall have the approval of two-thirds (2/3) or more of all of the votes of the Members who are present, in person or by proxy, at a meeting duly called for that purpose. Special assessments may be levied to be paid over one or more years. Assessments for normal maintenance and repairs shall not require two-thirds (2/3) vote. Section 5. Uniforrii Rate of Assessment. Annual assessments shall be fixed by the Directors at a uniform rate for each Lot, except the Directors may fix a different uniform rate for improved and unimproved Lots. The assessments may be collected on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis, or any other regular basis as shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Association. Special assessments shall be fixed at the same rate for each Lot affected by the special, • assessments. 10 • Section 6. Date of Commencement of Annual Assessments; Due Dates. Except as herein provided, the annual and special assessments provided for herein shall be due on the date determined by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall fix the amount of the annual assessments against each Lot at least thirty- days in advance of the due date of each annual assessment, and at least ninety days in advance of a special assessment. Written notice of the annual and special assessments shall be mailed or personally delivered to every member subject thereto, at their last known mailing address. Section 7. Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association. Any assessment not paid within thirty days after the due date shall bear interest from the due date at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. The Association may bring an action at law against the Owners obligated to pay the same or foreclosure the lien against the property or Lot. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided for herein by non-use of the open space or by abandonment of their Lot. Upon delivery of the notice of assessment to the Owner, the assessment shall be a lien upon the Owner's Lot until paid. The Association may record a notice of the lien with • the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. In the event of non-payment within thirty days after the recording of the notice of lien, the Association may foreclose the lien in the manner set forth under Montana law for the foreclosure of liens against real property. The Association is entitled to collect during an action for delinquent assessments any and all reasonable attorney fees and costs accrued prior to and in association with the collection of delinquent assessments. Section 8. Sale or Transfer of a Lot. The sale, transfer or encumbrance of any Lot shall not affect the assessment lien if recorded in the records of Gallatin County, Montana, or the personal liability of the Owner responsible for the assessment. No sale or transfer to a third party with actual or constructive knowledge of an assessment shall relieve such new owner from the liability for any outstanding assessments, or from any assessments thereafter becoming due, or from the recorded lien thereof. A person or entity purchasing a Lot shall be responsible for checking with the Association for any outstanding assessments against said Lot before the closing upon the purchase. ARTICLE V-ELLIS VIEW ESTATES OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT PLAN Section 1. Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development .is designed to meet the goals and objectives of the City of Bozeman 2020 Plan. The park lands, boulevards, trails, and open space in Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development are intended to • provide a general feeling of openness to buffer the residential areas of the P.U.D., to 11 • preserve and enhance existing watercourses and related vegetation, to provide accessible recreational opportunities within an urban setting, and to provide trail connectivity through the P.U.D. and into the adjacent neighborhoods. To that end, Declarant has adopted this Ellis View Estates Open Space Management Plan, which is incorporated herein by reference, and which is given the same consideration and enforceability as all other Covenants contained herein. The Ellis View Estates Open Space Management Plan is intended to provide a guideline for the protection, management, development, operation, and maintenance of the park lands, boulevards, trails, and open space within Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. Section 2. The parklands, boulevards, trails, and open space within Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development, as designated on the final plats, shall be preserved in perpetuity. The Ellis View Estates Homeowners' Association shall be responsible for payment of liability insurance and local taxes for these areas, and shall have the right and obligation to provide for the protection, management, development, operation, and maintenance of recreation and other facilities in the parks and open space areas consistent with this Ellis View Estates Open Space Management Plan. The Association shall also have the right to enforce the Ellis View Estates Open Space Management Plan. The Board of Directors of the Ellis View Estates Homeowners' Association shall • establish assessments for the taxes, insurance, and maintenance of all boulevards, trails, roads, active parks under the control and authority of the Association, P.U.D. parks, parkways, and open space. The assessments levied by the Board for the maintenance, upkeep, repair and operation of open space and other common areas, like all other assessments, become a lien on each Lot within the Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. The Board, may, in its discretion, adjust the assessments to meet the changing needs of the community and the areas serving the community. Section 3. The Association shall have the right to construct such recreational facilities in any portion of the common areas that may be approved by a majority vote of the members voting at any regular or special meeting called in accordance with the provisions ofthese covenants. Section 4. Trails may be located so as to provide opportunities for interior walking loops and watercourse viewing and enjoyment. Ancillary facilities such as benches, picnic tables, or overlook locations may be located and constructed along trails. Mowed areas are proposed adjacent to trails. All trails are to be Class II trails in accordance with the City of Bozeman trail requirements. Section 5. No motorcycles, ATVs, snowmobiles or similar means of transportation are permitted in the parkland or open space areas. Motorized vehicles and equipment are allowed in the parkland and open space areas exclusively for snow removal and landscape maintenance. • 12 • 0 • Section 6. Landscaping and plantings shall feature native species, but may incorporate non-native and ornamental species of trees and shrubs that will minimize maintenance and water consumption, or that will contribute to wildlife depredation problems. Terrain modification may occur where needed to enhance opportunities for human activities, especially in conjunction with the trails, to improve vegetative screening, to enhance watercourse development, and to minimize maintenance. Temporary fencing around shrubs and trees may be utilized to prevent or minimize destruction by animals or people during the time necessary to ensure the protection and survival of any plantings. Section 7. Noxious weeds shall be controlled on all common and open space areas. The preferred method is by introduction of desirable plant species that eliminate weed. Interim measures permitted include herbicide applications, mowing and biological control. All herbicide applications shall be conducted according to applicable regulations. Section 8. No feeding of wildlife other than birds shall be allowed in or on the park lands, trails, or common open space areas. The killing or taking of any wildlife species by any means within the park lands, trails, open space, or other common areas is prohibited except for the catching and release of fish, and the control of specific animals known to be causing unacceptable damage to property or persons (i.e_beavers damming the watercourses or porcupines identified as girdling planted trees). In such • cases, the Board of Directors shall contact appropriate professional consultants to trap and relocate such animals. Section 9. Domestic pets shall not be allowed at any time in or on the open space areas or trails unless on a leash. Pet owners shall be required to clean up after any pets they take on the boulevards, parks, trails and open areas. At no time shall any domestic pet be permitted to chase or harass wildlife in or on the parks, trails, open space or other common areas. Section 10. In general, no fences shall be permitted in the common areas. Temporary fences for the protection of plantings, as identified above, may be permitted. Fences required to restrict or direct human activity or safety shall be permitted as necessary, provided that no wire or metal mesh is used. Any required fencing shall meet the fencing regulations for the City of Bozeman. Section 11. Signs shall be permitted to identify trail routes, direct human activity or provide interpretive information. Directory signs should be combined with landscaping features, be made of natural appearing materials, and must comply with the provisions of the City of Bozeman zoning and sign regulations. Section 12. The Association shall be responsible for maintenance and snow removal on the common area sidewalks within Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. Such maintenance shall include cleaning of culverts, weed mowing and • patching or repairing damaged areas on the common area sidewalks. 13 • The Association may choose to hire contract services for road, sidewalk, and common area maintenance, in addition to the snow plowing and maintenance done by the City of Bozeman. The necessity for any such additional maintenance and snowplowing shall be determined by the Board of Directors. The Association may use the provisions of these Covenants for collecting funds to pay for such maintenance. Section 13. No Owner, guest or invitee may use or occupy the park lands, open space, trails, boulevards, roads, parking areas, or any Lot in such a manner as to disturb or interfere with the peaceful use, occupancy or enjoyment of any other owner, guest or invitee of Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. Violations shall be enforced as provided for in these Covenants and the City of Bozeman zoning regulations. I ARTICLE VI -ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AND DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS Section 1. Architectural Review Committee The Ellis View Estates Architectural Review Committee (hereinafter the "Committee") shall consist of three (3) members appointed by the Board of Directors, one of whom shall be designated as the Chairperson. It is suggested that at least one of the members • of the Committee have professional qualifications in the area of architecture, landscape architecture, or construction. Section 2. Scope of Responsibilities The Committee has the right to exercise control over all construction in Ellis View Estates. It will also review all homeowner's alterations and modifications to existing structures (including but not limited to walls, painting,renovations, and landscaping). No residence or structure, Improvement, fence, wall, garage, outbuilding or other structure shall. be made, erected, altered or permitted to remain upon the properties until written plans and specifications showing the site plans, floor plans, design, nature, kind, color, dimensions, shape, elevations, material, use and location of the same shall have been submitted and approved, in writing, by a majorit i of the Committee as to compliance with these Covenants. All documents submitted for review must be dated and. labeled. with the specific project title, owner, architect, contractor, and address, and must be accompanied by the fees required for review. Section 3. Standards for Review. It shall be the applicants responsibility to ensure that all proposed construction shall • comply with the Uniform Building Code, National Plumbing Code, the National 14 • • • Electrical Code, the City of Bozeman Zone Code and 2020 Community Plan, these Covenants, and any amendments thereto. All plans must be harmonious with the overall plan for the Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development. All plans and specifications must be suitable to the site, the adjacent Lots, the adjacent properties, and the neighborhood. All Improvements must be compatible with the surrounding properties and Lots so as to not impair or degrade property or aesthetic values. Section 4. Review Fee. A review fee will be required at the time of submission of all of the documents and sample materials. The Owner shall submit the documents and the required fee to the Committee chairperson or other designated member of the Committee. The purpose of the design review fee shall be to defray the Association's cost of review of all proposed site plans and specifications submitted to them. The fee, which shall be set by the Board of Directors, shall initially be $100.00. Section 5. Documents Required for Review. Three copies of the following documents in engineering scale of 1/8" = 1'0" should be submitted to the Committee chairperson: • A. Site plans including: i Lot lines and setback lines with dimensions; Building/Improvement footprints with entries, porches, balconies and decks delineated; Location, dimensions and materials for driveways and sidewalks; Elevation of first floor; Height of foundation from the top of the curb; Landscaping requirements and concepts; Location, height and material for retaining walls, garden walls, and fences; Water, electric and sewer service; and Exterior light locations and type. B. Complete construction drawings, including floor plans, exterior elevations of all sides, roof design, specifications, and any construction details, as follows: 1. Floor Plans showing: Foundation plan dimensioned; Exterior walls shown and dimensioned; Room use and dimension; Wall, window and door openings dimensioned; All overhangs of floors and roofs as dashed lines; Overall dimensions; and Total enclosed square footage. 2. Elevations including: A description of the material for the front street elevation; Porches, balconies, doors and windows; Principal materials rendered and specified; Height of each floor, eaves, and roof peak dimensioned from the first floor; Overall height from ground level; Roof pitch; Major building sections; Typical walls from ground to ridge; and • Typical porch section from ground to roof. 15 • 3. Roof Plan. 4. Landscape Plan, including plant listings and their respective locations. 5. Samples (1 set) of all exterior materials in their respective color proposals in an adequate size to evaluate. Section 6. Review Procedures. Upon review by the Committee, the Owner will be notified in writing within fifteen (15) business days after receipt of the documents for review, that the design has been. approved, approved with stipulations, or disapproved. The fifteen (15) day review time will not start until after the detailed site plan, floor plans, roof plans, exterior details, project specifications, color samples, sample materials, and landscaping plans have all been submitted. The Committee may .request additional plans, specifications, and samples in order to complete their review. In the event of such request, the remaining time for review shall not run until after such additional plans, specifications, and samples have been submitted to the Committee. • An application may be withdrawn without prejudice, provided the req-aest for withdrawal is made in writing to the Committee. No fees will be refunded due to such withdrawal. If the Committee does not contact the owner within fifteen (15) business days of the review commencement date, the application shall not be deemed "approved," and the Owner shall be entitled to file a written request with the Board of Directors that the application be reviewed by the Committee within five (5) business days of the date of the Owner's written request. If an application is approved with stipulations or is disapproved, the reasons for the approval with stipulations or disapproval will be clarified for the Owner, in writing and/or with drawings, within ten (10) days after the Owner has been notifies of the Committee's decision. If an application has been denied, or the approval is subject to stipulations that the Owner feels are unacceptable, the Owner may request a hearing before the Committee to justify his/her position. The Committee will consider the arguments and facts presented by the Owner and notify the owner of its final decision within ten (10) days of the hearing. Section 7. Action Upon Approval. • Approval by the Committee does not relieve an Owner of his/her obligation to obtain 16 • any government approvals. If such approvals are required and are not obtained by the Owner, the Committee and/or the applicable government agency may take whatever actions are necessary against the Owner to force compliance. Upon approval by the Committee, the Owner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Bozeman, with the Committee approval letter or approval stamp on the plans, as a prerequisite for City review. Upon receipt of both the Committee approval letter and the building permit, the Owner may commence construction in accordance with the plans as submitted. Any deviation from said plans which, in the judgment of the Committee, is a deviation of substance from either the Design Guidelines, these Covenants, or is a detriment to the appearance of the structure or to the surrounding area, shall be promptly corrected to conform with the plans submitted by the Owner, or corrected by the Association at the Owner's expense as provided in these Covenants. Section 8. Variances. All variance requests pertaining to the Committee approvals must be made in writing to the Committee, and must be accompanied by written verification that the requested variance does not violate the City of Bozeman Zoning Regulations or ordinances?:, or that the City of Bozeman has already approved the variance. Any variance granted shall be considered unique and will not set any precedent for future decisions. • The Architectural Committee may, upon application, grant a variance from the Architectural Guidelines, provided that the spirit of these Covenants is complied with, the requested variance does not violate the City of Bozeman Zoning Code or has been. approved by the City, and written notice of the nature of the variance has been mailed or personally delivered to all other Lot owners in the Alder Creek Subdivision at least. ten days before the variance is considered, in order to give the other owners a chance to comment and have input to the Architectural Committee. The Architectural Committee shall have the duty and power to make the final decision on the granting of the variance, without any liability being incurred or damages being assessed, due to any decision of the Committee. Section 9. Twelve Months for Completion. Any Improvements to be constructed or erected in accordance with the approval given herein, including all landscaping, must be diligently continued and completed within twelve months from the date of approval, unless otherwise extended in writing by the Committee. If construction of a residence, structure or Improvement is not commenced within one year after approval, new approval must be obtained. If any residence, structure or Improvement is commenced within one year, but is not completed in accordance with the plans and specifications within twelve months, the Directors of the Association, at their option, may take such action as may be necessary, • in their judgment, to improve the appearance of the Improvements so as to make the 17 • • • property harmonious with other Lots and properties, and to comply with these Covenants, including completion of the exterior, removing the uncompleted structure, or any combination thereof. The amount of any expenditures made in so doing shall be an obligation of the Owner. A lien on the Lot or property may be recorded and shall be enforceable by an action at law. In lieu thereof, the Association may take such action as is available by law, including an injunction, or for damages, and shall be entitled to reimbursement of their costs and attorney fees as may be awarded by the Court. Section 10. Compliance with Approved Plans. The Committee may inspect all work in progress and completed improvements, and give notice of any noncompliance as set forth below. During construction or upon completion of any Improvements, if the Committee finds that such work was not done in strict compliance with all approved plans and specifications submitted or required to be submitted for its prior approval, it shall notify the Owner and the Board of Directors of such noncompliance, and shall require the Owner to remedy the same. If upon the expiration of seven (7) business days from the date of such notification, the Owner has failed to commence to remedy such noncompliance, the Directors shall determine the nature and extent of noncompliance, and the estimated cost of correction. The Directors shall notify the Owner in writing of the Directors' estimated • costs of correction or removal. The Owner shall then have five (5) business days to commence such remedy, and thirty(30) calendar days to complete such remedy. If the Owner does not comply with the Directors' ruling within the five (5) business day period, the Directors, at their option, may stop construction of the Improvements, remove the noncomplying Improvements, or remedy the noncompliance, and the Owner shall reimburse the Association upon demand for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Association, the Directors shall levy an assessment and file a lien against such Owner, and the Lot upon which the Improvement was situated, for reimbursement, and the same shall be enforced and/or foreclosed upon in the manner provided for by law. Section 11. Limitation of Responsibilities and Liability. The primary goal of the Committee is to review the submitted applications, plans, specifications, materials, and samples in order to determine if the proposed Improvements conforms with the Ellis View Estates Architectural. Guidelines. The Committee does not assume responsibility for the .following: A. The structural adequacy, capacity, or safety features of the proposed structure or Improvement; B. Soil erosion, ground water levels, non-compatible or unstable soil • conditions. 18 • C. Compliance with any or all building codes, safety requirements, and governmental laws,regulations or ordinances. Neither the Declarant, the Association, the Board of Directors, the Committee, nor the individual members thereof, may be held liable to any person for any damages for any action taken pursuant to these Covenants, including but not limited to, damages which may result from correction, amendment, changes or rejection of plans and specifications, the issuance of approvals, or any delays associated with such action on the part of the Board of Directors or the Committee. . Section 12. Construction Site Maintenance and Clean-up. Construction materials shall not at any time prior to, or during construction, be placed or stored in the street or located anywhere else that would impede, obstruct or interfere with pedestrians or motor vehicle traffic within the sidewalk andior street rights-of-way. All construction materials shall be removed from the entire Lot within thirty (30) days of substantial completion of construction. Construction sites shall be kept clean, neat, and well organized at all times. All construction debris shall be the responsibility of the Owner and the building contractor, and shall be kept clean and properly stored on a daily basis. If • construction debris blows onto another Owner's Lot, it is the responsibility of the Owner and the building contractor to clean it up immediately. Street cleanliness is of particular concern. Any construction debris, especially dirt, gravel, rocks, and concrete, that falls or is left in the street shall be removed immediately from the street, and be brought back to a broom clean condition. The Ellis View Estates Homeowners' Association shall strictly enforce this provision, and reserves the right to fine negligent parties up to $500.00 for each infraction, to complete any clean. up the Board of Directors determines to be necessary, and to assess the Lot owner for all clean-up costs. ARTICLE VII-ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES I. BUILDING GUIDELINES. Section 1. Purpose. These Architectural Guidelines allow for flexibility while maintaining architectural continuity, and are intended to compliment the Bozeman Zoning Regulations and ordinances. The aesthetics, materials and forms common with Craftsman; Country, Prairie, Bungalow, and Traditional style homes provide a traditional aesthetic feel, with prominent front porches facing tree lined streets, while incorporating contemporary • floorplans and designs. The use of natural stone, rock, and brick are encouraged for 19 • the front facing exterior to enhance the traditional appearance of the homes. Rather than dictate specific design elements, the Architectural Guidelines are provided to assist Owners, builders, and architects in designing homes that are compatible with these styles, and the architectural character and elements associated with traditional neighborhood values and lifestyles. Section 2. Design Criteria and General Regulations. It is the intention of the Covenants to ensure that all homes shall be of quality workmanship and materials compatible with the other homes in the Elli; View Estates Planned Unit Development. All initial or subsequent improvements to Lots in the P.U.D. shall be subject to the following architectural and landscaping guidelines. All plans must be approved by the Committee as provided herein, prior to application to the City of Bozeman for a building permit. No construction of, or alteration to, any Improvements shall be commenced on any Lot prior to receiving the written approval of the Committee and a building permit from the City of Bozeman. All Lots in the P.U.D. are subject to the zoning regulations and ordinances of the City of Bozeman. In addition to these Covenants and the zoning regulations and ordinances, building design may be regulated by other City, County, State and Federal agencies. The Owner shall be responsible to ensure conformance with all applicable regulations. • Section 3. Single Family Residence Lots. The Lots in the P.U.D. shall be used exclusively for the construction of single family residences only. Section 4. Home Occupations. Home occupations or professions may be conducted upon the Lot or within the residence by the Owner or occupant of the residence, provided that there are no employees on the premises, and there is no advertising of any product, work for sale, or service provided to the public upon such Lot or in the residence. No advertising or directory signs relating to the home occupation shall be allowed. No "daycare" or child care businesses shall be allowed. All such home occupations or professions must comply with the requirements of the Bozeman Zoning Regulations or ordinances regarding such activities, and all required licenses must be obtained prior to commencing such activities. Section 5. Exterior Walls and Facades. A. Materials. The exterior siding of all residences and Improvements shall consist of natural stone or high quality simulated stone, rock, brick, wood, wood products or wood look- alike • products, or cement board siding building materials approved by the Committee. Stucco 20 • • • or EIFS with a smooth or roughcast (pebbled) finish may also be permitted upon approval. No vinyl siding, cement block, or panel siding similar to T1-ll siding or plywood sheet siding is permitted. Any use of sheet or panel metal siding must be approved by the Committee. All facades of a residence or Improvement shall be made of the same materials and similarly detailed. B. Colors. The color palette of the body of the residence shall be traditional colors, including earth tones, pastels, neutral, natural wood, or muted primary colors, that harmonize and compliment the neighboring properties. Trim, frames, doors, garage doors, and windows shall be the same color as the main body of the home or a compatible accent color. Color schemes must be varied from 2 adjacent properties, in each direction. All exterior wood shall be painted or stained. C. Design Direction. No diagonals (sloping lines) other than roof slopes shall be visible on any facade. Siding shall be run horizontally, with the only exception being below the roof line but above the first level, where it may be run vertically. Maximum lap siding exposure is 7" unless approved otherwise. Brick surfaces shall be predominately a horizontally running bond pattern. Stone shall be set in an un-coursed pattern with a horizontal • orientation. D. Outbuildings. The following outbuildings are permitted, either attached to the main house or as an outbuilding: garage, workshop, artist studio, sauna, gazebo, or conservatory. The exterior design, style and colors of any outbuildings or structures on a Lot shall conform to the design, style and colors of the main residence. All outbuildings, including garages and storage buildings, shall be architecturally compatible with the main residence. The maximum size of an outbuilding shall be 750 square feet on the ground floor, unless otherwise approved by the Committee. Section 6. Windows and Doors. All windows shall be of double or triple glazing. "LowE" coatings are permitted, but no mirror glazing shall be allowed. All windows and sliding glass, french, or atrium doors shall be vinyl, aluminum clad wood or similar material. Unclad custom built windows for individual applications shall be trimmed and painted to appear the same as the other windows in the structure. The patterns, sizing, and symmetry of windows and doors shall be of consistent types and shapes, in accordance with the design of the structure. Sliding doors may only be used in rear yard locations unless otherwise approved by the Committee. • 21 • 9 • Section 7. Foundation Design. All building foundations shall be constructed to at least 18" above the top of the curb. Basements may be constructed in areas of suitable ground water depths. Exposed concrete shall be limited to a maximum of 8 inches from the bottom of the siding to the finish grade: Exposures of more than 8 inches shall be covered by shrubs, masonry veneer; texture concrete surface such as exposed aggregate or synthetic stucco. Section 8. Roofs. A. Form,Pitch and Eaves. Roof forms shall consist of traditional gable, hip, or shed roof designs. Secondary roof forms are encouraged to enhance architectural scale and variety. No roof ridge line shall extend more than forty (40) feet without interruption by an intersecting roof line, secondary roof structure, or step down roof. Primary roof forms shall have a minimum pitch of 6:12. Secondary roof forms may have varying roof pitches, but no roof component shall have a pitch less than 4:12. • All primary roof forms shall have a roof overhang or eave projection and gable of a minimum of 16 inches, measured from the finished wall. Secondary roof farms may have proportionally reduced overhangs or eave projections. Soffits shall be required to cover all rafter tails and rough framing material except where framing members are finished and protected from exposure. All roof edges shall have a minimum fascia of 6 inches in height. B. Materials. Roofs shall be covered with shakes, tiles or shingles, and no rolled roofing shall be allowed. Exposed aluminum or silver flashing around chimneys or roof valleys shall not be allowed unless colored, textured or painted to match or complement the roof design and color. Rain gutters should be colored to match the trim or color of the. roof. Steel.galvanized gutters are not permitted. C. Roof Equipment. All roof mounted equipment shall be integrated into the overall roof design and screened. All. sewer, bath fan, hot. water heater, wood or gas stove, or other roof venting stacks shall be painted a color as similar as possible to the roof material color. Skylights shall be flat in profile (no bubbles or domes). Skylights shall be applied parallel and flat to the roof and are not to be on any roof parallel to the street. • Any use of solar panels or collectors must first be approved by the Architectural Committee. Any approved solar panels or collectors shall. be inconspicuously 29 0 9 • located, and shall be integrated into the overall roof design, parallel with the slope of the roof or wall of the building, and are not to be on any roof parallel to the street. D. Chimneys. Chimneys may exit the building on an exterior wall or within the structure. It is strongly encouraged that chimneys emerge from the highest roof volume. When part of an exterior wall, chimneys. may be used as an accent form to break up the mass of the wall. Prefabricated metal flues shall be concealed within a chimney. Chimney caps may extend no more than 16" above the chimney top. Chimneys shall be of a material that compliments the other exterior finishes, and may include brick, natural stone, stucco, or wood framing when the finished wood material is the same as the siding. Section 9. Porches. Main entry doors are encouraged to be either with a porch or gable extending over the entrance, and/or recessed a minimum of 5' from the primary facade of the house. It shall provide weather protection and visual definition. Front porches are intended to be open to allow for interaction with the street. Porch screens and glazing are not permitted. • Porch railings are encouraged to be closed and constructed of the same material as the adjacent form, unless otherwise approved. Front stoops shall be made of brick, concrete, or stone. Wood may be used only when constructed to form an apparently solid mass. Porch supports shall be stone, masonry or concrete piers no less than 16" x 16" square, or wood piers no less than 8" x 8" square. Tapered columns may not be smaller than 8"x 8" at the top. The space below front porches shall be enclosed and integrated into a closed band, interrupted as necessary for drainage. Exterior stairs visible from nearby .streets or public spaces shall only show stepped horizontal railings, except that diagonal handrails may be attached thereto. Exceptions will be considered on design merit. Any attached flower boxes and planters shall be made of materials integrated into a closed band. Section 10. Decks. Decks may be located only in rear yards. The space below first floor elevated decks visible from nearby streets or public spaces shall be enclosed or covered with wood lattice, with a maximum of 1-1/2" space between strips. Section I L Exterior Lighting. • 23 • 0 • All exterior residential lighting must be free of glare and shall be fully shielded or shall be indirect lighting. All exterior residential lighting on all Lots must be incandescent and limited to a maximum of 60-watt incandescent bulbs, and shall be of such focus and intensity so as to not cause disturbance to adjacent Lots. No direct lighting shall shine beyond the Lot line of any parcel. No exposed bulbs, mercury vapor or high-pressure sodium lights are permitted. Decorative fixtures, or recessed or canned lighting is encouraged for porches, main entrances and other exterior applications to achieve softer, non-glare, lighting effects. All residential lighting shall comply with the City of Bozeman lighting requirements. Recessed or can lighting is encouraged for porches and main entrances for softer lighting effects. Clear glass fixtures (i.e. coach lantern style) are prohibited. Honey glass or amber glass panels are encouraged as an alternate. Obtrusive flood lighting and front yard landscape/pathway lighting, and clear glass or exposed bulb (non-cutoff) fixtures are prohibited. Yard and walkway lighting shall be compatible with the scale and architectural design of the main residence. Standardized street lighting will be installed as required by the City of Bozeman throughout the P.U.D. All exterior lighting and exterior lighting changes shall be approved by the • Committee. For the purposes of this paragraph, the following definitions shall apply: Fully Shielded lights: Outdoor residential light fixtures shielded or constructed so that no light rays are emitted by the installed fixture at angles above the horizontal plane as certified by photometric testing. Indirect Light: Direct light that has been reflected or has scattered off of other surfaces. Glare: Light emitting from a luminaire with an intensity great enough to reduce a viewer's ability to see. Section 12. Parking A. Private driveway parking spaces shall be no less than 12 feet x 19 feet with access to a street. i B. Trash containers shall be located within the parking areas and be screened. C. Two off-street (driveway) parking spaces are required for each residence. • Section 13. Zoning. 24 i • All zoning, land use regulations and all other laws, rules and regulations of any government or agency under whose jurisdiction the property and Lots lies are considered to be part of these Covenants and enforceable hereunder; and all of the Owners of said Lots and properties shall be bound by such laws, rules and regulations. In the event there is a conflict between the Covenants and the applicable zor_�ing, the most restrictive provision of either the Covenants or the zoning shall control. Section 14. Easements. There are reserved, as shown in the plat and as may otherwise be reserved, easements for the purposes of constructing, operating, maintaining, enlarging, reducing, removing, laying or relaying lines and related facilities and equipment for utilities, including, but not limited to, those providing gas, communication and electrical power. Fencing, hedges and other items allowed by the Covenants may be placed along and in the easements as long as the intended use of such easements are not prevented. I.I. SITE DESIGN GUIDEL.I.N.ES. Section 1. Single Family Lots.. • All building plans shall be submitted to the Architectural Review Committee to confirm compliance with the standards below. Variances to the code may be granted on the basis of specific urban conditions. All building plans shall conform to the City of Bozeman Building Department's requirements and the applicable Uniform Building Code. Section 2. Density. No more than one (1) single family residence may be built on each Lot. Section 3. Minimum Dwelling Sizes. Each Lot shall provide the minimum living space exclusive of garages, decks, porches and carports of 1,600 square feet above grade, with a minimum of 1,200 square feet above grade on the ground floor, unless otherwise approved by the Committee. ARTICLE VIII -LANDSCAPE DESIGN Section 1. Definitions. Front Yard` The areas from the set back (build-to) line to the property line, and from side Lot line to side Lot line. Side Yard Corridor: The area from the side of the residence to the side Lot line, less • front yard and rear yard. 25 Rear Yard: The area from the back of the residence extending to the rear property line. Section 2. Driveways. All driveways and parking areas shall be surfaced with concrete, and in no case be located closer than five (5) feet to adjacent property lines. No Lot owner shall fill or obstruct the natural flow of any borrow ditch, drainage swale, or culverts. Section 3. Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed to City of Bozeman standards, and shall be installed at the time homes are constructed on individual Lots, if they have not been previously installed. Section 4. Fences. Maximum fence height is 5'-0" unless a relaxation (6'-0" maximum) is requested and granted from the Committee. Maximum height for fences in corner sideyards shall be 5'-0". No fences are allowed in required vehicle vision triangles, and the _maximum height of landscaping in required vehicle vision triangles is 30". No fences are • allowed in front yards unless approved by the Committee. Rear yards may be fenced with wood or materials that look like wood (excluding split rail). Rear yard fencing cannot extend past the mid-point of the residence and garage. The front yard shall not be fenced. Any fence or wall constructed so as to have only one elevation "finished," which shall be defined as not having its supporting members significantly visible, shall be erected such that the finished elevation of the fence is exposed to the adjacent property and street. Fence design and location must be approved by the Committee. Fence designs should have a cap board or if a picket fence, have a flat top or dog-ear cut. No wire, chain link, or vinyl fencing is permitted. Fencing shall be maintained in good condition. Fences in the rear yards adjoining any parks or trails shall not be higher than four feet and must be approved by the Committee. Garden walls and retaining walls visible from nearby streets or public spaces shall match the water table or relate to the residential structure, and shall be built of br_ck, stone, stucco, shingles, or poured-in-place concrete with a surface texture approved by the Committee. Garden walls should appear as an extension of the building and are encouraged to be of the same building material as the structure. Gates in garden walls shall be made of wood. • Section 5. Antennas and Satellite Dishes. 26 • No external television. or radio antennas shall be permitted. Smaller satellite dishes of the latest technology (not exceeding two feet in diameter) will be allowed. All satellite dishes shall be inconspicuously located, and screened from neighboring and street views. Section 6. Utilities. All utilities, including but not limited to natural gas, electricity, telephone, and cable television, shall be located underground. Section 7. Landscaping. Each Lot owner will be required to meet minimum landscape specifications consistent with the overall plan for the P.U.D. These will include, but are not limited to: street trees, large canopy trees in specified yards, shrubs, mixed planting beds and turf lawns. Landscaping will be required for the entire Lot, including up to the actual edge of the road, curbs, and sidewalks. Landscape, grading and irrigation plans shall be submitted and approved by the Committee concurrently with the plans for the residence. Owners are required to maintain the landscaping on their Lots in a manner that does not detract from the appearance and value of the adjoining Lots or the aesthetics of the • P.U.D. Landscape maintenance will be enforced by the Association as provided in these Covenants. Section 8. Trees. All Lot owners shall plant a minimum of trees and shrubs to enhance the aesthetic features of their Lot. Trees are encouraged to be planted in clusters rather than at regular intervals around the Lots. Shrubs and flowers may be used to provide a transition from the tree clusters to the lawn surfaces. Unless prevented by a utility easement or garage access, the Owner shall plant a minimum of one tree for each Lot smaller than 60 feet, two trees for each Lot larger than 60 feet, near the street in, front yards. Rear yard trees are encouraged but not required. All trees must be planted a minimum of 8 feet from the Lot line when adjacent to a neighbor, and may not be planted in the utility easements. It is the responsibility of the Owner to contact the appropriate utility companies before digging. Tree varieties shall be selected from varieties recommended by the City o= Bozeman Zoning Regulations or ordinances. When selecting from provided species list, it is the responsibility of the property owner to check the appropriateness of that species with specific site conditions. Deciduous trees are encouraged to be placed on the southern and western during the winter months. Deciduous. trees must be planted a minimum of 20 feet from the eaves. Planting beds and any bedding around tree base areas shall be • mulch or earth tone stone (not white). 27 • Section 9. Weeds. The Owner of each Lot shall control the weeds and all noxious plants on their Lot; provided, however, that the Owner shall not use spray or killing materials in such a way as to be harmful to humans or animals or to the neighboring or common area vegetation. In the event an Owner shall not control the weeds and noxious plants on their Lot, the Association, after ten days written notice to an owner to control the same, may cause the weeds or noxious plants to be controlled, and may assess the Lot owner for the costs thereof, as set forth in these Covenants. ARTICLE IX-TERM. ENFORCEMENT APPLICABILITY AND CHANGE Section 1. The provisions of these Covenants shall be continuous and binding unless terminated. For an initial term of fifteen (15) years from the date of these Covenants, or until 75% of the Lots in Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development have been sold, these Covenants may be modified, altered or amended only with the Declarant's consent. After the initial fifteen (15) year period, or after 75% of the Lots in the P.U.D. have been sold, whichever first occurs, the provisions of these Covenants may be changed or amended or additional Covenants added, in whole or in part, upon approval of two- thirds (2/3) of the votes of the Members of the Homeowners' • Association at a meeting duly noticed and called for that purpose. The dedications or easements for roads, utilities, parks, trails, and common areas shall not be changed without the unanimous consent of all of the Owners affected by the change. Any covenant required as a condition of the approval of the Ellis View Estates Planned Unit Development shall not be altered or amended without the agreement of the governing body. Any change of these Covenants shall be effective upon the filing and recording of such an instrument in the office of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. The President or Vice-President shall execute and record the amendment, change or addition with the Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana. Any change in these Covenants shall not affect existing structures and uses of the Lots. Section 2. Enforcement of these Covenants shall be by proceedings either at law or in equity against any person or persons violating, or attempting to violate, any Covenant; and the legal proceedings may be to restrain violation of these Covenants, to recover damages, or both. Should any lawsuit or other legal proceeding be instituted by the Association or an owner against an owner alleged to have violated one or more of the provisions of these Covenants, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover the costs of such proceeding, including reasonable attorney's fees associated with the action, as may be ordered by the court. • 28 • • • Section 3. The failure of Declarant, the Association or an Owner, to enforce any Covenant or restriction contained herein shall not be deemed a waiver, or in any way prejudice the rights to later enforce that Covenant, or any other Covenant thereafter, or to collect damages for any subsequent breach of Covenants. The waiver of, or approval of a variance of, a Covenant provision by the Board of Directors, or non-action of the Association or Declarant in the event of a violation of a Covenant by a particular owner or Lot, shall not be deemed to delete or waive the Covenant or enforcement thereof as it pertains to other Owners or Lots. Section 4. Invalidation of any one of these Covenants by judgment or by Court order shall in no way affect any of the other Covenants or provisions, all of which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. In any conveyance of the above described real property or of any Lot thereon, it shall be sufficient to insert a provision in any deed or conveyance to the effect that the property or Lot is subject to protective or restrictive Covenants without setting forth such restrictions and Covenants verbatim or in substance in said deed nor referring to the recording data. All of the above described real property and Lots shall be subject to the restrictions and Covenants set forth herein, whether or not there is a specific reference to the same in a deed or conveyance. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has hereunto set its hand as of this day of , 20 MAHAR MONTANA HOMES, LLC By: Joe Mahar, Member STATE OF MONTANA ) ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 20_, before me, a.Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Joe Mahar, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above instrument and acknowledged to me that they he is a member of Mahar Montana Homes, LLC and executed the same. Notary Public for the.State of Montana SEAL Printed Name: Residing at: • My Commission Expires: 29 • EXHIBIT A Lot 4A,Minor Subdivision 35C located in the NE'/a of Section 25, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County,Montana. Said Tract of land being 5.01+/- acres more or less along with and subject to any and all existing easements. • • 30 • • • D .o co a k' 2 • APPENDIX H LIGHTING PLAN M • /s VIEW ES TA T``ES sUBM/V/S/ON LIGHTING PLAN LEGEND SINGLE LIGHT POLE \ \ / (EUROTIOUE, HANOVER SERIES EH16 175M MED GCF SR3) i I EXISTING ZONING. R-S(COUNTY) \ \ LOT 12 \ \ REARRANGEMENT OF SUBDIV. \ / i I LOT 3 \ NO. 8—B OF SOURDOUGH I 1 MINOR SUB NO. 35—A \ \. CREEK PROPERTIES 69.139 W r- - - - - - - - - '��:`v�OPEN SPACE 2 .i —42.°67- . \ / ✓ �'J�O\�.Up�Fz�\ / / ----93.75 -8940'00 —^ - 34,519 Sq Ft / 0d' / O i -----'-94.17 89.40'00". -'— -- 6=1SI 1,12" z—s LOT 1 O Z� O i / `✓ 10.152 Sq Ft ( �\ } F E n n o `',.`,•'�:,_ s'; LOT 2 N �.. 10,497 Sq Ft LOT 9 LOT 8 T 12.944 Sq Ft ® 12,784 Sq Ft o °''•._,• o'oo p3p0 \. / U N P L A T TF_D � W w�,� :°`• h ti4> \ ' ' . ♦ °o:•. GOLDENSTEIN I N Q` LIMITED Z t p ZONING.- R LIJa 90.18 090'00'00" 126.75 090'00'00" \ `\ EX. �" O I � .- " '—S PARTNERSHIP o tea,` `'�:: LOT 3 CITY) sue•, 13.758 Sq Ft \ \ \ C\/�/ Y, OPENI SPACE 154.84 8T32'30" \ 14,034 O Sq Ft o 16.BO83 Sq Ft � -i0. LOT 4 1 - /! 16.844 Sq Ft 18.44 L-26.24 e=5.59'10' _�'' ,•:•(L� Y \ \ A=8'31.06" --53:80 89'40'00 r� '.7 .. 179BJ , ' :,. •. Scale In Feet �' L=29.03 -o 4b8 �h6. raa.ss•13, 60 0 n e=13zTsa' . !'176.50 'r 60 II 1 R= 3126 .-._.-,•----';_�~ �dJ LOT 5 Scale In Meters ..... 50._ 5380 BY4000 \ \`'s . 13,174 Sq Ft S '"0 APE I�SPACE \ �I 34,519 Sq Ft r eta 3ot5.W" ,� tie ----' PARK ! 11 8 Q 00 18.184 Sq Ft -- llll F Y cF Engineering and Surveying Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone 406).587-1115 Fax 406)587 9768 ` 1#' 4--'' - `_/P EN SPACE www.chengineers.com•info@chengineers.com Sheet I Of 1 f� =- =t.=%. r. =' •'�°''� • D a k' • • � APPENDIX I PARK PLAN 1 • 0• .Iti Y ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION PARKS MASTER PLAN April, 2013 Prepared for Mahar Montana Homes • 1627 W. Main Street,#370 Bozeman, MT 59718 Prepared by e a Nursery & Landscaping P. O. Box 10242 Bozeman, MT 59719 (406) 587-3406 design@cashmannursery.com • • I ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE Overall Project Description and Background 3 Adjacent Property Ownership & Zoning 3 Soils Information 3 Construction Phasing 3 PARK PLAN 4 Parkland Trail Corridor 4 Park & Open Space 4 Site Furnishings 5 • Plant Community Types 5 Plant Palette 6 Irrigation Plan 8 Well Information 8 Maintenance Plan 8 LIST OF EXHIBITS 10 1. Ellis View Estates Subdivision Parks, Open Space and Trails Plan • 0 0 3 • Overall Project Description and Background The Ellis View Estates subdivision is located in Gallatin County on the south edge of Bozeman, Montana. The development is bordered by South 3rd Avenue and Good Medicine Way. The subdivision consists of 9 residential lots. The project area totals 5.010 acres. There are 9 lots totaling roughly 2.779 acres zoned R-S. The balance of the acreage is to be park and open space consisting of three park spaces and a trail corridor. The parks and open spaces consist of three areas. The space along the north edge of the subdivision is 34,519 square feet, the area at the south west corner of the subdivision is 18, 184 square feet, and the area in the southeast corner is 34,519 square feet. A trail corridor connects the space and also connects to the adjacent Sundance Springs development. The park master plan addresses park and open space for a cohesive overall park, trail and open space system for the residents of the development, neighbors and visitors. Adjacent Property Ownership & Zoning Please see the "Plat Supplements" section of the preliminary plat application. Soils Information • Soils in the project area are primarily loams, typical of relict stream terraces. Blackmore silt loam comprises the majority of the area with minor instances of Enbar-Nythar loam. Soils are deep, nutrient rich and slightly alkaline. Loam soils are appropriate for park development and suitable for woody plant growth, herbaceous plants, and seeded or sodded grassland. Construction Phasing There will be no construction phasing. 0 4 • PARK PLAN The master plan for the Ellis View Estates Subdivision provides a cohesive overall park, trail and open space system for the surrounding community. Primary goals of the plan include: 1. Preserving and enhancing water courses, wetlands and associated.riparian zones and preserving existing vegetation. 2. Providing a trail system of Class II trails serving the development itself and providing connections to the greater community. 3. Providing a variety of recreational activities, both passive and active in nature, ranging from picnic areas, open play space,to a walking and biking path.. 4. Creating functional, attractive plantings that will provide wildlife habitat, seasonal interest, shade, use separation, wind protection, visual and audio buffers for and from surrounding uses. Parkland Trail Corridor • A six foot wide, 315 foot long Class II fines trail will connect to the Sundance Springs development along Good Medicine Way. An additional trail spur(139 feet long) will connect Ellis View Loop to the Sundance Springs trail system. The trails will be Class II trails meeting all current City of Bozeman standards. A trail post and waste station will be located at the north end of the spur trail on Ellis View Loop. Park and Open Spaces Park and open space total consists of approximately 1.298 acres of open space, wetlands, and wetland setbacks. The open space will contain roughly 454 lineal feet of Class II trails connecting the three spaces and connecting the development to the Sundance Springs trail system to the south. The three open spaces will be seeded to a Tall turf- type Fescue,providing a ground surface that is durable, wear tolerant and suitable for active play. Planting buffers will be provided between the active play fields and other uses, such as detention areas. The areas transitioning from play field to native, undisturbed will be seeded to native grass and will not be permanently irrigated. The grass seed mix will be a combination of Western Wheatgrass, Thickspike Wheatgrass, Slender Wheatgrass, and Sheep Fescue. (See Exhibit 3) • • • 5 • Site Furnishings Trail markers and waste stations will be placed at trail system entry points. Trash receptacles and bike racks are recommended. Future Lot Owners r Associations will be authorized to install such , n fixtures as the need is proven. All playground structures, site furnishings, seeding and planting - r methods and materials shall meet all current City of Bozeman guidelines and requirements. Improvements will be installed with the appropriate phase of the development. The project and phase �" a owners will be responsible for park establishment, "` grading and seeding, planting boulevard trees and required wetland plantings, installing trails, trail marker and waste station. Plant Community Types The parks and open space in the SUD are designed to accommodate a variety of recreational activities. The vegetation will vary depending on the type and intensity of • use. Generally, the plant communities fall into three zones: dryland, non-irrigated grassland; irrigated turfgrass; and wetlands. Plant lists are provided as a general guideline for species selection, but may be modified if approval is obtained from the City of Bozeman Park Department. (See Exhibits 2, 3 & 4) Diyland Non-irrigated Trees: Brandon Elm,Norway Maple,Tatarian Grassland Community Maple,Green Ash Evergreens: Colorado Spruce,Rocky Location: Open space and trail corridors Mountain Juniper Uses: Passive and active recreational uses Elements: Trails Shrubs: Serviceberry,Buffaloberry Maintenance: Grass is not irrigated or mown Seed disturbed areas to native grass. Seed mix Drip irrigation to all plantings will be a combination of Western Wheatgrass, Thickspike Wheatgrass, Slender Wheatgrass, and Sheep Fescue. Trees: Lanceleaf Poplar,Brandon Elm, Tall Turf-type Fescue Community Thornless Honeylocust and Norway Maple. Small ornamental trees include Japanese Tree Location: Park and open spaces, boulevards Lilac,Canada Red Cherry and Tatarian Maple Uses: Active and passive recreational uses Evergreens: Colorado Spruce • Elements: Trails, open play space Maintenance: Turf areas will be not be irrigated Shrubs: g Juniper,Votoneaster,Lilac, Potentilla, Spreading Juniper,Viburnums Seed lawn areas to Water Saver-all Turf-type Fescue mix. 0 0 6 • Wetlands Plant Community Plants include: (Zone 1 and 2) Lanceleaf Poplar Common Chokecherry Coyote Willow Location: Open space and trail corridors Uses: Passive recreational uses Existing grass and forb vegetative cover to be Elements: Plantings, trails preserved and restored as trail construction Maintenance: Grass is not irrigated or mown requires. Drip irrigation to all plantings Plant Palette (Exhibits 2, 3, 4) Street Trees Street trees will be planted in all public owned boulevards. Species will be selected from those approved by the City of Bozeman Forestry Division as suggested in the Tree Species Guide produced by the Forestry Division and the Bozeman Tree Advisory Board. Species might include Brandon Elm (Ulmus x • `Brandon'),Norway Maple (Ater platanoides), Greenspire Linden(Tilia cordata `Greenspire') and Brandon Elm Thornless Honeylocust(Gleditsia triacanthos v. inermis). In order to provide a varied and diverse urban forest, no species shall comprise more than 40% of the overall number of trees and at least four different species shall be used in the street tree plantings. k All boulevards will be seeded to a high quality % Kentucky Bluegrass mix and provided with an automatic sprinkler system. Norway Maple • • Large Shade Trees Large shade trees will be used in park areas to h enhance the natural setting, provide shade, provide " r wind protection, delineate use areas, buffer surrounding uses, and to provide beauty. Species will include Golden Willow(Salix alba `Vitellina') and the native Lanceleaf Poplar (Populus acuminate) in the naturally moist locations nearer the creek and wetlands. Thornless ' Hone locust and Brandon Elm can be used in drier locations. Golden Willow Evergreen Trees Large evergreen trees will be used in buffer zones to separate uses, for windbreaks, to provide wildlife habitat, and to provide year-round structure and beauty in the plantings Colorado • " � Spruce (Picea pungens) and Rocky Mountain Junipera 'a le (Juni erus sco ulorum) are ossib species. Colorado Spruce Small Ornamental Trees An assortment of small ornamental trees will be incorporated into the plantings to provide seasonal interest and color, wildlife habitat entryway identification, and spatial definition. Species include Amur Cherry (Prunus maackii), Canada Red Cherry (Prunus vir ink `Canada Red'), K t 9 Common Chokecherry (Prunus vir ing iana a, ' Japanese Tree Lilac (S raga reticulate) and Tatarian Maple (Acer tatarica). Canada Red Cherry • • 8 • Riparian Zone Plants A variety of plants native to these types of riparian zones will be planted to enhance the natural habitat and stabilize soils. Plants might include: { '' Lanceleaf Poplar ' Golden Willow Common Chokecherry Coyote Willow(Salix exigua) R A4t Irrigation Plan As reflected on the conceptual landscape plans, some areas of the parks will be irrigated. These areas will utilize an automatic underground irrigation system. A well will be installed in each park for irrigation. The areas designated as play fields and all boulevards will be irrigated Kentucky Bluegrass turf. The transition zones will be native grasses. All trees and shrubs will be drip irrigated. Irrigation shall be installed to meet all City of Bozeman Park Division design guidelines and requirements. • Well Information Well logs in the proximity indicate good potential for irrigation wells. Information on two irrigation wells drilled in Stadium Center just to the north of the Campus Suites site show the following: Well 1 produced 60 gpm with the drill stem set at 58 feet for one hour with a one hour recovery time. Total depth of the well was 60 feet. Static water depth was 9 feet. Well 2 produced 60 gpm with the drill stem set at 75 feet for one hour, with recovery time not recorded. Total depth of the well was 78.5 feet. Static water depth was 14 feet. Well log information is available at http://mbmggwic.mtech.edu/ Park Maintenance The project developer will be initially responsible for the maintenance and care of the parks, trails and open space. The developer shall,warrant against defects in the initial improvements for a period of one year fiom the date of their written acceptance by the City of Bozeman. At that time, the maintenance shall become the responsibility of the Lot or property Owners Association having been formed under the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the SUD. The Association shall be responsible for • maintenance in perpetuity, or until such time as a park maintenance district, or some other mechanism, is created to maintain dedicated park land. The LOA Board of Directors will provide Waiver of Protest to the City of Bozeman upon its formation. At 0 0 9 • this time it is anticipated that park and open space maintenance functions would be contracted out. Maintenance duties may include; spring care, mowing, fertilizing, watering, and maintaining play equipment as described in greater detail below: Spring: Spring care will be as follows: as soon as the snow is gone and the grass is dry enough to walk on without compaction, remove leaves and winter debris with a broom- type rake. Power raking at 3-5 year intervals will be beneficial for heavily thatched lawns. Aerating will also alleviate compacted soil conditions and should be performed when necessary. Pruning of trees and shrubs shall occur in early spring before leaves emerge, except on maples and birch, which shall be pruned late July. Pruning shall be performed according to ISA standards to encourage good plant health, proper shape and branch angles, and to eliminate unwanted suckers. No topping of trees will be allowed. Mowing: Mowing will start in the spring as soon as new growth starts. Most lawns should be mowed at a 2-inch height in the spring, early summer and fall. During the heat of summer mowing heights should be raised to roughly 2.5-inches. Frequent mowing at 4-5 day intervals is essential to discourage weeds. Native grass areas are not intended to be mown, although they should be mowed to control weeds until grasses are established. Fertilizing: Fertilizer will be applied at regular intervals a minimum of three times per • year to all turfgrass lawn areas. One pound of actual nitrogen per 1,000 sq. ft. will be used at each application. The first application will be applied in the spring when mowing for the first time, then six weeks later in early June and once in the late summer. Fertilizer will be applied to a dry lawn and then watered in after applying. A high nitrogen lawn food with approximately twice as much nitrogen. as phosphorus and potassium should be used. Based on soil conditions and types, added iron is recommended for this area. Watering: Enough water will be applied at each watering to soak the soil down to the depth of the root system. To conserve water, the amount of water applied will vary with the amount of natural rainfall. Recommended is 1-inch of water per week. The turf will be allowed to dry out between watering. Native grass areas will not require watering after initial establishment. Weeds: Weed control will be the responsibility of the various lot owners associations and individual lot owners in compliance with the approved weed management plan. Weed control will consist of regular herbicide applications after final grade work has been completed and before seeding or sodding is to occur. Once turf areas are established, broadleaf weeds will be managed with a liquid application of 2,4-D. This broadleaf herbicide will be applied on a still day to a wet lawn when temperatures are above 70 degrees and the area will then not be watered for 2 days to follow. Native grass areas should be mowed to control weeds until the grasses are established. Broadleaf herbicides can.also be used to aid in native grass establishment. • Snow: Snow removal on paved walkways will be included in maintenance responsibilities. No snow removal will be provided on Class I1 trails. • 10 • EXHIBITS 1. Ellis View Estates Parks, Open. Space and Trails Plan • • 0101 0000 a7 � 5 O �l J r D 00 it " •. � �. Z fZ I D Cn 0 --� ~ o- 4 RIGHT OF Z � EXISTING ZONING: A—S WA), I I ' w` (COUNTY) ASPHALT 21 SOUTH THIRD AVENUE 1/16 LINE OF SEC, 25 - • - • '- 12 w_ __ 12•we 1t•y M.ZI M.ZI DITCH R=1534.89 l 5 m TDB 4-46-1-85. _ I t TOB d+0394=1 • TOE - - - - - - }---- io,— — ` OPEN I P a 9 9 _ _ _ _ _ _SPACE 1 3,843 S Ft i �a Z Z N O u! •1or{;0 �:9 --.i. . _ �r m F a CD to x M 1 u0 700 , o �� Loam t 8I C/) ^gyp O fNA� ' /P\ ZM> O S, I N LnMLn a I Z (D N r—c-) E D I I _ to, I C O. . m> in u0 a I N Z Ln � I a te _ I I a SS 0 l/ rTl z I Cn O rrl z I 3 4 t, I I c x , f` S50 o0I D z (� rw 0 a n z D I ���/ '/ BSS •'•a 0�D Z� c� nr ICI / ss e —8.w sS O I I oo 8••SS—� N z a z � o r / a0 / Wr,„ Im -0m / I" I Wo�K: ar 0MOOMO II I m NCDCn a ci Air / IN I o j 0 off'. � , N / Im I mo Z�K o zmz `eO01D O > I / aYy 0 ;a m oo z / / \ o M O s` s O \ 0 gym. �� /� m i{ \ / \ \ X c O N R \ Im N a/ \ C1TI 1 <2./ //t1 z \ J) -7 \ = O ° > / �1 N \ �2, O /fib\ � �� G CS \ co CP 1 � \\ 0, \ �s 1 I \ ( \ F`n \ \ Pate: 4-24-2015 �Id,�,. Per'4ed for: CASHMAN NURSERY �3 �, W. Seale: LANDSCAPING Ellis View Subdivision IIIm 30 'OII '�`�F,F.l��`1 P.O. Box 10242 �K .,�., Park & Open space ode Bozeman, MT 59719 510ned:INA (406) 587-3406 I �.. z �,c �'� = � � �_ ° 3 • • Table of Contents Section 1. APPLICATION FORMS 2. LIST OF APPLICANTS.AND OWNERS OF PUD 3. STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES A. LAND USE POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES B. OWNERSHIP C. POPULATION D. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 38.20.090 E. LAND USE CONFLICTS • F. ENERGY 4. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE 5. APPENDIX A - PLANS/MAPS/ILLUSTRATIONS • 0 i PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST •The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses j of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land I 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site 3• A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area 4. Stormwater Management Permit Application required ❑ ❑ ❑ B. Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No I N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'/2-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms [✓]� ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and 2"' ❑ ❑ • directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the 2"" ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial ❑ ❑ 2" uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the J ❑ ❑ applicant h. Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 38.20.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria),BMC.The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require,or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated • j. Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., [✓� ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) i Page 3 (PUD Checklist—Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04,revised 11/14/11) 0 0 PUD Preliminary Plan Information,continued Yes No I N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 81/2-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document • shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: k. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed,including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 81/2-by 11-inches or 11-by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences, walls and other landscaping C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent ❑ ❑ off-site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: a. The proposed width ❑ ❑ • b. Treatment of curbs and gutters, or other storm water control system if other 2r ❑ ❑ than curb and gutter is proposed C. Sidewalk systems ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the ❑ ❑ City are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following: a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 38.41.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 ❑ ❑ feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires platting,a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to ❑ ❑ the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 38.41.080.B.9, BMC, at the discretion of ❑ ❑ the City Engineer, a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development.The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses. The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 38.41.050.1,BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ under question,the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's ❑ ❑ • association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 38.38.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application 10. Stormwater Management Permit Application required CpnS ifilC�l�t1 ❑ ❑ Page 4 • • SITE PLAN CHECKLIST • These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No"or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board_(DRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following: Design Review Board(DRB)Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1• 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ ff 2. 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or ❑ industrial space 3• 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ 4. Parking for more than 90 vehicles ❑ B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1. Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ 2. List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 38.40,BMC(Noticing) ( ❑ ❑ 3• A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will ❑ ❑ travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character • or pose a threat to public health and safety 4. Boundary line of property with dimensions ❑ ❑ 5• Date of plan preparation and changes ❑ ❑ 6. North point indicator ❑ ❑ 7• Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet [a"' ❑ ❑ 8• Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑ ❑ 9• Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio, FAR), , ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking ❑ ❑ C. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ 11. Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential ❑ ❑ density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, covered and ❑ ❑ uncovered bicycle parking, compact spaces,handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on- street parking,number of employee and non-employee parking spaces,existing and proposed, and total square footage of each • Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03;revised 9/22/04;revised 7/24/07,revised 11/14/11) I • • General Information,continued Yes No N/A • 13. The information required by Section 38.41.060.L, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless Rr ❑ ❑ such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the ❑ ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑ ❑ 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑ ❑ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with Section 38.41.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 38.38, BMC ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) 19. Stormwater Management Permit Application required ❑ ❑ C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: • Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to ET ❑ ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way 2" ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points ❑ ❑ 5. Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site C21- ❑ ❑ 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas ❑ ❑ C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities [„ ❑ ❑ d. Water ❑ ❑ C. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: a. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain • delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 38.31, BMC (Bozeman ❑ ❑ Floodplain Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Page 4 i i Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A • 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water Er ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with B.M.C. Chapter 40 Article 4 storm drainage ordinance and best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) ❑ I ❑ b. The downstream conditions (developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑ ❑ topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of confect 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, ❑ ❑ parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ 15. Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review Ef ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 38.28,BOAC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Permanent and construction period exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑ ❑ 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances, traffic areas (both ❑ ❑ • vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 38.41.060.18,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previously provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ 19. Landscaping-detailed plan showing plantings, equipment,and other appropriate information ❑ ❑ as required in Section 38.41.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required,complete section C below 20. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees ❑ ❑ and shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas ❑ ❑ y 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site LT ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑ ❑ structures or districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ 26. The information necessary to complete the determination of density change and parkland ❑ ❑ provision required by Chapter 38.27, BMC, unless such information was previously determined by the City to be inapplicable and written confirmation is provided to the applicant prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application.If a new park will be created by the development,the park plan materials of Section 38.41.060.16,BMC shall be provided. 27. Describe how the site plan will satisfy any requirements of Article 8 Section 10, BMC ❑ ❑ (Affordable Housing) which have either been established for that lot(s) through the • subdivision process or if no subdivision has previously occurred are applicable to a site plan. The description shall be of adequate detail to clearly identify those lots and dwellings designated as subject to Article 8 Section 10,BMC compliance requirements and to make the obligations placed on the affected lots and dwellings readily understandable. Page 5 • 0 D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required, the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: • Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the ❑ ❑ property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑ ❑ 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and the ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain; the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys,utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑ ❑ 5. Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated ❑ ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, including watercourse buffer ❑ ❑ strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan ❑ ❑ including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking ❑ ❑ and loading areas,including information as to the amount(in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ ❑ • damage during construction 10. Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water ❑ ❑ features 11. A description of proposed watering methods ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) ❑ ❑ 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan — see Section 38.26.060, BMC (Landscape ❑ ❑ Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for Ef ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade ❑ ❑ 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑ ❑ 19. Areas to be irrigated ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 38.23.100,BMC (Watercourse Setbacks),if ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not ❑ ❑ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls • Page 6 9 • • 2. LIST OF APPLICANTS AND OWNERS OF PUD Developer: Mahar Montana Homes Members: Joe Mahar Applicant: C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 3. STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES A. LAND USE POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES The planned unit development will consist of a total of 9 lots with 1 single family home on each lot. The PUD is intended to meet the goals of the 2020 plan while addressing the concerns of the adjacent homeowners. The development is planned to fit well with the surrounding medium and low density residential properties. An east-west pedestrian trail corridor is planned through the approximate center of the PUD providing direct access to the large park located in the center of the subdivision. • All parkland/open space requirements for the subdivision and PUD will be met with the dedication of one large park in the center of the property and several smaller trail corridors, open spaces, and smaller parks. The dedication of the large parr in the center of the property ensures that a usable space, within walking distance for all residents, will be available for the enjoyment of the public. A smaller park, approximately 53' wide, running from the north end to the south end of the PUD, enables the existing irrigation ditch to function as a landscaped amenity breaking up the blocks and facilitating pedestrian circulation. Where possible the existing healthy trees, shrubs, and bushes will be maintained and incorporated into the development plan. B. OWNERSHIP Open space within the PUD, outside of the private lots, will be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association. The articles of incorporation and covenants will spell out the responsibilities of the association. C. POPULATION ESTIMATE The City of Bozeman estimates a population of 2.11 persons per dwelling unit for • residential properties, or 19 persons for this development. There will be no business, commercial and industrial uses aside from those that are allowed within the R-S zoning i • • district. D. PUD DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA 2a. All Development 1. Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services: water supply,trails/walks/bike ways, sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television and streets? The development complies with city design requirements with the exception of the street cross section for which a minor relaxation is being requested to allow a slightly narrower boulevard strip (S' wide) between the sidewalks and curb. 2. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Existing vegetation consists of pasture grasses and scattered weed species. Following disturbance, vegetation will be replaced with • turfgrass, either from sod or seed. The parks and opens spaces will be composed of a more naturalized vegetation matching that which currently exists on the open spaces to the north in Sundance Springs Subdivision. Natural vegetation will be left in place along the ditch corridor at the southeast corner of the property. 3. Are the elements of the site plan designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Yes, the proposal will produce an efficient, organized and cohesive planned unit development. 4. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The lots/homesites are clustered in the center of the property allowing all services to be provided in an efficient manner. The square footage of roadway and hardscape has been minimized in an attempt to reduce the cumulative energy use associated with the project. • • 5. Are the elements of the site plan designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? The plan is arranged to provide an open space buffer around the perimeter of the property. The open space buffer will increase privacy for the residents. The lots and homes are oriented wherever possible such that outward views are maximized. 6. Park land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provide for each proposed dwelling as required by Section 3 8.27.020? ` The homesites are buffered from adjoining properties by landscaped open space parcels which contribute to the aesthetic quality of the site configuration. The dedicated parkland and open space is in excess of that required by Section 38.27.020. 7. Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points. Performance points will be provided for this project with the • creation of open space within the project boundaries commonly held by the property owners association for the use of owners, residents and their guests. 2b. Residential 1. On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the city growth policy? The city's growth policy calls for low density residential properties with the R-S zoning district. There is no specified minimum density for properties zoned R-S. This project will provide a net residential density of'3.2 dwelling units per acre. This is similar to the 2,9 dwellings per acre net density found in Sundance Springs Subdivision, Phase IA which adjoins this property to the south. 2. Does the project provide for private outdoor areas for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light, sun, ventilation, privacy and convenient • access to the household or commercial units they are intended to i • serve? The proposed lots are of sufficient size to allow for private outdoor areas for the residents. 3. Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? The project provides trails, open space and public parkland for active and passive recreational activities. 4. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus--- NIA a residential density bonus is not required for this project. 5. Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to provide efficient public services and facilities? The project has been annexed into the City of Bozeman in order to utilize the existing public services and facilities. The existing • services are readily available and provide the most efficient manner by which the property can be developed. 6. Residential Density Bonus.. N/A, a residential density bonus is not required for this project. 7. Limited Commercial. N/A, limited commercial is not proposed with this proiect. 8. Does the overall PUD recognize and, to the maximum extent possible,preserve and promote the unique character:of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? E. LAND USE CONFLICTS Conflicts with land use are being avoided by providing a development with similar. use as the surrounding properties. The residential character of adjacent • subdivisions will be continuous through this development. There are no • commercial or industrial uses planned for this subdivision. F. DESIGN METHODS TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION Energy consumption from this subdivision will be minimized by providing infrastructure which is friendly towards alternative transportation methods. Alternative transportation will be encouraged with the construction of trail corridors and bicycle lanes throughout the development. The reduction in vehicular traffic will decrease energy usage, road congestion, and air quality impacts. 4. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE The landowner would like to start construction of the underground utilities, roadways and parks in the summer of 2013 with home construction commencing in the fall of the same year. The home construction schedule is dependent on market conditions; it is assumed that the project will have achieved final build out by winter of 2015. These dates are assumed and can be modified depending on market conditions and changes with the owners' schedule. • • • du a d d ' N 3 • �-st-� � ---- '�"" ;ff 1 1fyS a� .. gam-' ',F6- .�.. �s.:r,��•y�-^•{. .� r !•� } ` 1 �1 ✓� .��'i ��: �" y Aye-` �`y � �t _ _—_._ •~ `w;• . ` :. •....Via. � D.,.yw,. _......__._...__.- r :�i- �.i- �. .• ..G..w � t.r �� Fr ..• Y _..,... ' � ,� - _ - Jam. � _ .«.�---.-......_•.�f _ Y,- yy 4 0. rr FORC . ` r t 4' 1 _...._._..o.....__. ._.._... -,._::. .....-._..: ..... .__.._�_ _._...._...,...__... ... �-.-_.�.•,a.Q.�.,.�a -�.e._� ,....tee. ..-_..a..�,. _ FLOG RP(AN.._.._.. ... 0 2' 3' B' Single family with front entry. raraue MAHAR HOYMS ` i SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO • P.9i0. F0Nff #11W4A/4Y PL14N CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELL/ VIEW ESTA 7"ES SUED/V/S/ON LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF RECORD BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35—C OWNER: JOE MAHAR LOCATED IN THE NE 1 4, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA srEF.: DOC. NO. 2237386 I i EXISTING ZONING: R-S(COUNTY) \\ \\ \\ T 12 AREA TABULATION I LOT 3 \ \ REARRANGEMENT O S BDIV. NO. 8-8 OF OF LOT AREA = 121,070 SQ FT - 55% Fnd. Gaston YPC MINOR SUED. NO. 35-A \ \ \ PARKLAND = 18.184 SQ FT - 8% I DAVID W. & ANN M. KRAFT SOURDOUGH CREEK PROPERTIES Fnd. Gaston YPC \ \ OPEN SPACE = 38,362 SQ FT- 18% 10' Wide Utility Easement \ TERRY N. & MARTHA A. LONNER / PUBLIC STREETS = 40.634 SO FT - 19% <:::: :::'':;`;'4i»,.^:::,:,n:.... ............ ................................................_...._.._..._.....:._........-_... \ 3- :............_........_.._........................_...........:.r_.._...._......r._................._.... .._......_.... _...__....__......................._...._..._...... L TOTAL AREA = 218,250 SQ FT ton,�, .; �....., �4 PARKLAND REQUIRED = 11,761 SQ FT _NS =. - . - . - . -_._..._. ...-•-- - _...... / / R°pip 69 Rol, I ;; - - - - — — .......—.........— \ p° OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 24,214 SQ FT ;', ; - - - - - - - - - - ..� � ro S . ...;. �--; N, I'.. i pF �- -1 0 LAND USE BREAKDOWN � SP-A . ESTIMATED TOTAL FLOOR AREA = 29,484 SQ FT 1 o {'``' •. a2.sr 4,519 Sq. Ft. od o / NO• FS ESTIMATED FLOOR AREA RATIO = 0.24 Q i �? t \ _ :�24�A,/ \ \ / �Og°\J ROPOSED BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES = 18,608 SQ FT - 8.5% - ,!'w w-n"w a'w � I ? \ ° 04 PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS & PARKING =7,300 SQ FT - 3.3% s; i r7`, \ z i1 I Ln W e I ' z ; } Ft 11-1 i \s 0 w D(T H: :k6 AQQ+ ZCD Spy 7 V F \ / AN 2. T 1DELI C S ° �ti j , \...... �s \ \ / ' $/�R v I� ER 1�\pR �S EEN \ :u MIN \.... $. \ �P: \ / Je0\ OQ� �1• p LX I,..._.w.., tl � \ \ \�<.� UG�GAS/ SIGN i ` L i IY, ; rnn ?r APR / OT �.. I \..... � 4 q Ft. ...\.. .. �\ ..� i ' :I N 8 00� zs4 s . ... 1 q7 4 Sq. Ft. \� �✓ o.� ,t� \ ' \ / UNPLATT D I w I "'" \ Gu GOLDENSTEINI i: Q L � 6 LIMITED �i € a I t C \ 501 \ i A ': O PARTNERSHIP Rebar _ oa 5.0103 Acre "" \O ...,��o S Ft\RPQ w I a" 90.18 090 00'UO' ,28.75 o9a o0'00' 3 \ E ZONING. R-S I, v 100 M Ft. � ... . : ; - - - - - - - - - - - C IT ............. - �.. �" _..,.,...... FOR PC —SAC:'PER I� i I ;o:; l►' I I I fI � rd o rnh I I I ,. o — SU1sB�Da4—IVISION —No. B f — — � \ q1. � OPEN SPACE � ; : 6 I NDAN I Ft. I I m / \ �L SU CE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION , L S'' / 844...'Sq. Ft \\ \ \ L-18.44 L=26.24 ......... ..., ( i e=B'3r'0 e=5.59'1(r t.•. / ` \ \ i \ Scale In Feet 7 ,`5` ,i ; L,3*27' . 0—B9-4o•0 .yy y� \ T?9•a3� \ 7 ' m 60 0 60 i ass 18 0 18 _ � I - �aW t ` , o, 5 ; o��OENC 2 \ e \m j a ':. Scale In Meters r� 11 sso sa.Bo Bgao'-- ?s 5�0,e �519 Sq.—FE .... . t �` ,o r' PROPOSED TRAIL POST \ e• J `4;'Sq. t. :. rff \ AND WASTE STATION a:s: i •,� ss pROPaSED MAIL . 8„SS suss L B PARK o a g, \ I , 55 . L DELIVERY LOCATION....., \ se — — — T — — —;`— — e" :;.... ....l, .,j Fnd. RPC — 3 o Utility Easement 18,184 Sg Ft. ;`+ e'Ss y/ fr' \ 3111 — —r 0' de U 'I PROPOSED 30' ry ; r Mlnor Su I i — 07) � !:".-• . '.y°° r ................ LIL �1 WI tl �`•. , pe bdvsion No 35 A SEWER EASEMENT; \' DO Sig Engineering and Surveying Inc. - .....:' ';;;; OPEN SPACE Fnd. Gaston YPC ;`` OPEN SPACE ,;;:.":: ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL LOT 2 I'" SQNDANGE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman, MT 59718 Go on YI�C I %>`'`''=` POINT RPC No. 3111 ES Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)567-9768 / OF BEGINNING '`� 6' de Trail vwwv.chengineers.com•info@chenoineers.com Sheet l Uf 1 % �. �On� #11489 • • • a • � y c� a N • • • Looking South from Good Medicine Way cul-de-sac 4 i��j � � .' yax i}�r��f 4 �t_.✓ + .t ffy'h��,ry .� y? 'Y �, ' + • Looking southeast r . ` _-' ... O-�` .<� •r.r li Y 1 31�'`�`4S4V I��,y�.�;}� y.3 �.. �.. T n - • Looking across property to the West • Looking North t y - t • • • • East view along trail corridor just south of subject property r r • • z 1-i b ' ..may~'� .%��� is s _ -fit; 17 �I. �hl�r ^ f I1 `.� tir�R�er� ir+/1fL"� 9 i•^m �. X�., � `� t ` Y1� 'i. �.'�''x )I, ,r 5�`J`. ` >• ;A '.fir �•[l'�i'�`.as. 3 .')f .i}i��Jj ':4 arss�/ n1'1 ..•• .'. Ir J.,.. >Zl+4��t +h,�q� � ?jy�, �'Ce"'ly�i. .t •)y'�, +- ( vet V 1 � "h 'r..f"�.-.:s t.�'{L•j 1 > "'. ` •t�Y `.` � +t:r t �' ,..lt !I` ty,Y, ';-�„ 1"" rs'�—"�C ;" � -. -ry�•V•s$'� �... I + R;,)IY \I,`-. .� fs\l,rf;,r,�(4Z t):rq t ��4,_ i .,, ) ,�,a S�_r ¢." 4. •-)r ,�..�i,,,•t'�t��+'`r ,� •?�/� :/� .I e- �fkrf§S�� > � �'u 1+.' 1 ..Skin I r. 2 S?��f •: �. ���y�J 4 '� N � A b ��4Y��yr�`- �. /3:4i R� � L:1• 1 � • ♦. f1 I ..sue % / Stk� IF/ -I �. .,r � :•r, .r I / �� / ��` :/ �,:is, �X.�.• ��i/Y. tin .. { y /•��r• '� 0 Looking north along Good Medicine Way �4 ?�s R 3 m •4 s c; CO) <D � O n y O y • ' i _ r , ^it III Mill IIH 31' B.O.C. TO B.O:C. r DEWA K IDEWA K 1, 5' 5' 15.5' 15.5' S' 5' 1 20' SETBACK 26.5' 26.5' 20' SETBACK R/W R/W TYPICAL STREETSCAPE CROSS SECTION • SCALE: NTS �� • • m . �—, 3' .. d i SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO • . � R' -Am CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALELL/0 VP/EW(��. EN TATEAS Y LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF BD'VISION RECORD BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, M/NOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35—C OWNER: JOE MAHAR LOCATED IN THE NE 1 4, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA DEED REF.: DOC. NO. 2237386 EXISTING ZONING: R-S(COUNTY) \ \ \ AREA TABULATION I SUO NO. 35-A \\ \ REARRANGEMENT OF OF S T 1 BDIV. NO. 8-B OF LOT AREA = 1 -1;0-70 SQ FT 55% I MINOR BD.nd. Gaston YPC \ PARKLAND = 18,184 SQ FT 8% I Fnd. Gaston YPC DAVID W. & ANN M. KRAFT \ SOURDOUGH CREEK PROPERTIES OPEN SPACE = 62 S(LFT- 18R 1 Wide Utility Ea ment \ TERRY N. & MARTHA A. LONNER y / :;-_::;_:_: .-.._. . . PUBLIC STREETS - 19% _.............................................__ .........................._... - ........................._._... •se TOTAL AREA = 218,250 SQ FT ,. [N 89'40'00"E] o� PARKLAND REQUIREDQ�1,�761SQj T i; I — — — — - —OPEN SPACE REQUIRQ FT 69 '::';i;I r, — — — — — — 6 SOJR - - - - - - - - AeE — � ... : ; �; ;,:; ��1 � �'•�" =� � of LAND USE BREAKDOWN ^' " �'' ESTIMATED TOTAL FLOOR AREA = 29,484 SQ FT \519 Sq. Ft� ESTIMATED FLOOR AREA RATIO = 0.24 Q I �; ! ROPOSED BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES = 18,608 SQ FT - 8.5% N / \ / PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS & PARKING =7,300 SQ FT - 3.3% I ; t M`' I —T — 09 / \ \ / OF (� Iw '' a 1v \ °o \ O pNG �'•• / � 4 8940 Ft. Ft.0 Z ,\ C1?e =3 Q DIT 'A. .......... SO' oo 9LUE a v U I 2. MDE C S a �� p Ico AN TLI R� MIN N Al- RAP Q-OQ N <, W I;..._. .., -I' a, �: ;.LOT `�j� `\ � UGX\AS1 SIGN E4 ; 1; it II z,s44s � UNPLATTED ; 11�7 4 Sq. Ft. ���,�, $ \ cuJE u / cWi � /RGOLDENSTEIN (� ' i a .... �s /i ±tLIMITED ti• : i ! l i i (n L — J L- --'.. LOT \4A— — — — — �18�4�- FtPARTNERSHIPet &I i Rebar W50103 Ac O � S C � E ZONING.- R �7 1 .. Acre I e S ± ' ?° ;•' 90.18 090'00'00' 126.75 09a00•oo' 3 \ .......... '.... ;; ; Q — — -..... - - - - - - - - .. �T ............... n �............... p — \ \�% ME p FOR C -SA � ° SUBDIVISION No. y G � — I I M I =,5�a—ar33a— 1 — — — — — OPE SPACE ' LB il ;m; �, I 6 I I \ \\� I + OPEN, SPACE ± r. a • TL SUNDANCE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION ice' �a I Ft. I I r \ :(1 do i I �.......� 4 OT; 4 ; \\ °w \ , / \ -44 .Sq FE i LL O — rl q L-18.4a I a=s ss•10.........,..- Lm29,e a=6310 :,, ors ao o e �' ear- Scale ,; \ In Feet " 7 5;; t =13.27 , \ 60 0 60 ` w , f e-u - /'H..w ass_._-• a••ssI / � aye= 18 0 18 I ' a••w 1 p a•w 1 ', I o, \ ° (01PEN S CE 2 25 5 /1 Scale In Meters I; ` ``: ! I I 113 I 53.80PROPOSED TRAIL POST \ `�'° 4;'st ;' 5 19 q...- =`" "''" — — — — — — 1' e.• q• AND WASTE STATION �` \ r' OROPbSED-M.A L .. — — r 6�-- I.... PARK \ o \,►,. _ L �°� �+s' \ suss DELIVERY LOCATION_... I 0 p• T ,0 ,184 Sq. Ft. 1 se — — 4- 18 — `— — — �% 8's .._.•-:-: i Fnd. RPC — 10' Wide Utilit Easement i — - r r ; N : ; , ::! pe M' o Su No. 35-A 111 PROPOSED 30' \ ; ;' ,•� � s'� `; � %��': y`'' ' \ 3 'E r' L - - L — '- - - - - - - - - - - - -'SEWER EAS — EMENT} o e..s��n38_3§sAaoar:a•• [S89 '0:0„ t OPEN SPACE Fnd. Gaston YPC OPEN 5 ACC Engineering and Surveying Inc. - P� � Fn C`' DA P DI N ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL LOT 2 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman, MT 59718 ''°` 1 Sk�N AN S RINGS SUB V o. 3111 ES Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 Go on C ;= POINT OF BEGINNING 6' de Trail www.chengineers.cam•info@chengineers.com Sheet I Of �� 0�,;` #11489 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO • PREL/1/ /ARY l�AT OiF CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELL/ V/EW ESTA T"ES SUED/V/S/ON LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF RECORD BEING AN MENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, M/NOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35—C OWNER: JOE MAHAR LOCATED IN THE NE 114, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA DEED REF.: DOC. NO. 2237386 I I \ \ \ / • i EXISTING ZONING: R-S(COUNTY) AREA TABULATION I LOT 3 \ \ REARRANGEMENT OF SUBDIV. N0. 8—B OF OT 12 LOT AREA = 121.070 SO FT — 55% Fnd. Gaston YPC MINOR SUED. NO. 35—A \ \ \ PARKLAND = 18,184 SQ FT — 8% DAVID W. & ANN M. KRAFT SOURDOUGH CREEK PROPERTIES Fnd. Gaston YPC \ P \ OPEN SPACE = 38.362 SQ FT— 18% 10' Wide Utility Easement \ TERRY N. & MARTHA A. LONNER / PUBLIC STREETS = 40,634 SO FT — 19% ::::::: .._..._........................_...__..._...._.._...__..._.._...__..._.._............................_... ... \ TOTAL AREA = 218.250 SQ FT „ • "= :::... �N89�40'OO��E� / ", PARKLAND REQUIRED = 11,761 SQ FT i — — — — — — • — — \ / / Op�G OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 24,214 SQ FT 69 I ; . . . . — — — — — — P ACE — r� — \ • r � .... of of tl ..,. j ..... QI (Si ;(°' 37�0894D' ._....._rt,�519 Sq. Ft/ a�od \ / Q� PROPOSED.BUILDING SETBACKS I� ; i w _e„w a„w I ;? `\ ,a a� \ / / \w P• P ( / / s \ �2 \ S gO RpP RP( FRONT YARD - 20 FEET N ti';; —� ' ' 9 \ REAR YARDS - 20 FEET ICU i`v.i i i u7 In e'��"fir °o \ O. e: p �Nt G(ZS Z a 1v o \ O ply `V• `/ 77r! ((4 0 Z 2 a� 10,152 Sq N I .B .............. w ;9f_UE ! DITCH o3 Sp o \ ............ C'3 '1 -Os m ��S .......... ....... t If If V I I; i 2.5' WIDE PUBLIC ACCESS ayo \ 2. ` / ? v I� ' '�`: :' f€€` AND UTILITY EASEMEN PER 1"� O� Np q�FS FN ik MINOR SUBDIVISION No 35A \'�e0� p�� / .. S P �E N '''b °�.. W I ......w. .,i , �, �� : LOT 2 \ �cti o�`� s/ slcN o0� N; LOT 9 : e 1 97Ft. rR n rn 12,944 Sq. Ft. o.... ...... Sq o ....... { . 0 c� 04 4 S f; ° �; Ln LOT 8 COP m `T iN: , . a UNPLATTED I �' i i GU: 0 27 4 Sq Ft q UY/ R. c� T A Syo. GOLDENSTEIN [i I Q -•....-• T \ .............. w L ,; a �1 +2a LIMITED , ; 6 / '�: : I;: : :: :1 ;N 218,249 Sq Ft.. '`'� ' PARTNERSHIP �'' ? i \O Set C& �8" Rebor 5.0103 Acres \ H;'RPO, Oz ' W \ EX. ZONING.- R-S I!' ; 'CY ,j 8 Sq. Ft. p a 90.18 090'00'Oo• ,26.75 090'00'00" LOT \ c0: 13`75 : �� sf ' Qe':. M s* .. .� TEMPORARY EASEMENT /T - o • C Y � II'II ;^r .. o FOR CUB DE SAC:PER \ \\ ""' ............. �— MINOR SUBDIVISION No. \y� So ' 154.84 BT32'30" ..... OPEN SPACE 358 , fib ;< LOT 6 LOT 7 I \ SUNDANCE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION I N � !0 a a 14,034 Sq. Ft. 16,883 Sq. Ft. Q+ I� ;''� \ ............... r n r Q ' ry a �' p ........... iLOT; 4 o 16.844 rq. Ft \ \ I It o L=26.24 L=18.44 \ L=29.03 =8'31'0 A=5.5910" .....r,•... / �" r`, \ Scale In Feet 7 5`' ' € e=,327's8• 'o ey \ , t I \\ 55 1.... w e."S;WSJ \mLOT"! a ,OMEN • 1 5 , M 53.80 89.40'00 '; i( '�• 'T •`'!'�.'.• 5 :e' _ 34 19 S FE. — Scale In Meters . :f. ; LOgsso- \�� 13,174;`Sq. t t. q` -- — — 3 `tirl.�! I PROPOSED TRAIL POST \ a: "'�. - r AND WASTE STATION _ pROP1pSED •MALL 0 AT10 — € DELIVERY LOC N.... PARK 8,184 S9 Ft. — r ....,.,- � ............ Utility PROPOSED 30' � e'ss 1�� — - 10' Wide Utili Easement er Minor Subdivision No. 35-A o ygoy \ se � Fn d ry 311 t`[- — — P — — — — — — — — — — — —SEWER EASEMENT: — �' a s���3s_3§ �:e — — � — OPEN 'S;PACE h...... :......:........ . . .:.. Fnd. Gaston YPC Engineering and Surveying Inc. 9 9 Y 9 j..............: .. r ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL LOT 2 ;' OPEN S•PAG� 1091 Stonerid a Drive•Bozeman,MT 5971 B /• '` """ Sd�NDANCE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION ............ g Go on YF�C / .•. ...... •,....`�• '' "• nd. RPC No. 3111 ES Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 // POINT OF BEGINNING www.chengineers.com•info@chengineers.com Sheet it Of !y / / n^ ' 6' de Trail 11489 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO • PRELMWffVARV PLAT QF CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBS/V/S/ON LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF RECORD. BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35-C OWNER: JOE MAHAR DEED REF.: DOC. N0. 2237386 LOCH TED IN THE NE 114, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF 'P.M.M., GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA �OF MO/vjq CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR �P Nqt� I, Mark A. Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby certify that between January 1, 2011 and June ____, 2013, this survey was prepared under my direct supervision, and I CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION and CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER MARK A. o have platted the same as shown on the accompanying plat, and as described, in accordance with the o �AN��R provisions of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Sections 76-3-101 through 76-3-625, M.C.A., I, the undersigned property owner, do hereby certify that I have caused to be surveyed, subdivided and platted N and the Bozeman Municipal Code. into lots, parcels, roads and other divisions and dedications, as shown by this plat hereunto included, the 0 NO. 95180 following described tract of land, to wit: 29 RFGI ST1;) Dated this day of 2013. �P Mark A. Chandler LEGAL DESCRIPTION FNG/NEER PN� Montana Registration No. 9518ES LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION 35C, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 2 South, Range OF MONlgN 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. q I, Joe Mahar, and I, Mark A. Chandler, a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Montana, do hereby certify that the improvements, required as a condition of approval of this Area = 218,250 square feet, 5.0103 acres, or 20,276.1 square meters. Subject to existing easements. a o% MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLAT, have been bonded. The subdivider hereby warrants against defects in these Z6 MARK A. o o �AN��R r improvements for a period of one year from the date of installation. The subdivider grants possession The above described tract of land is to be known and designated as ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION, City of m > of all public infrastructure improvements to the City of Bozeman, and the City hereby accepts Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and the lands included in all streets, avenues, alleys and parks or public N NO. 951SES possession of all public infrastructure improvements, subject to the above indicated warranty. squares shown on said plat are hereby granted, donated, and dedicated to the City of Bozeman for the public 5 O use and enjoyment. 29( �FG f ST \IQ�O Dated this day of 2013. The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm or corporation, whether public or private, FNG�N PN� Mark A. Chandler providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas, internet, cable television, or other similar utility or Montana Registration No. 9518ES service, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of their Joe Mahar lines and other facilities, in, over, under and across each area designated on this plat as 'Utility Easement' to have and to hold forever. CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS I, the undersigned property owner of this Major Subdivision, do hereby waive the right to protest creation of a I, Director of Public Service, City of Bozeman, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat City Wide Park Maintenance District for maintenance and upkeep of dedicated park land and trail system. In doing has been duly examined and has found the same to conform to law, approves it, and hereby accepts so, I do not waive any right to comment on, protest, and/or appeal any assessment formula which may be the dedication to the City of Bozeman for the public use of any and all lands shown on the plat as proposed, if I believe it to be inequitable. This waiver shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns, and purchasers of being dedicated to such use. all lots within this Subdivision. Dated this day of 2013. Director of Public Works Dated this day of 2013. City of Bozeman, Montana Joe Mahar CERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW STATE OF MONTANA GALLATIN COUNTY ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION, Gallatin County, Montana, is within the City of Bozeman, Montana, a first—class municipality, and within the planning area of the Bozeman growth policy which was adopted pursuant to Section 76-1-601 et seq., M.C.A., and can be provided with adequate storm water drainage and adequate municipal This instrument was signed or acknowledged before me on this ____ day of _______________ 2013, by facilities. Therefore, under the provisions of Section 76-4-125(2)(d) M.C.A., this subdivision is excluded from the Joe Mahar, member of Mahar Montana Homes. requirement for Montana Department of Environmental Quality review. _ __ _________________ Residing at: ______________ Dated this day of 2013. Notary Public for the State of Montana Director of Public Works City of Bozeman, Montana Printed Name: __________________ My commission expires: _________ CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER I, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided have been paid. Dated this day of 2013. By: Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER I, Charlotte Mills, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montano, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was filed in my office at _ _ o'clock __.M. this __ _ day of A.D., 2013, and recorded in Book _____ of Plats, on Page Engineering and Surveying Inc. records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman,MT 59718 Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 Document Number ------------- By: www.chengineers.com•infoCfchengineers.com Sheet 2 of 2 _ Deputy Clerk and Recorder #11489 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO 10 F Rff"M 1/ARY PLA T CW CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELL/ VIEW ES TA TES SUBS/VISION LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF RECORD BEING AN MENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35—C OWNER: JOE MAHAR LOCATED IN THE NE 114, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA DIP REF.: DOC. N0. 2237386 I I i \ \ \ / "EXISTING ZONING: R-S(COUNTY) \ \ \ / / LOT 12 \ / AREA TABULATION I LOT 3 \ \ REARRANGEMENT OF SUBDIV. NO, 8-8 OF LOT AREA = 121,070 SO FT - 55% Fnd. Gaston YPC MINOR SUED. N0. 35-A \ \ \ / SOURDOUGH CREEK PROPERTIES PARKLAND = 18,184 SO FT - 8% Fnd. Gaston YPC DAVID W. & ANN M. KRAFT \ TERRY N. & MARTHA A LONNER \ / OPEN SPACE = 38,362 SO FT- 18% 10' Wide Utility Easement ..:::::.:.:.::::.:::.::.:.,__._ _..._..._....._.............._...__.........__...__...__..._ PUBLIC STREETS = 40,634 SO FT - 19% .............. .. ..,_ _ .. - .__.__.._.._....._....................___... TOTAL AREA = 218,250 SQ FT �. [N89�4O'OO E] - _ PARKLAND REQUIRED = 11.761 SO FT C ` " — ' — ' — ' — ' — ' — ' — ' — ' OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 24,214 SQ FT 69 ,9 i'•'`i — — — — " ""— — — 6� SOJ r-, I i �.. E PACE : — :._ / ........... CO .....CAP N .....� ... .. .. s; sris—oagao o " 4,519 Sq. Ft. od o O" S _`i \6?03•\ i ' g9�4 \ SIJ-� QR°SQZP PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS ,!) e!w e•� ew • O• FRONT YARD - 20 FEET • N EN GR O, °y9SIDE YARD 5 FEET • / REAR YARDS - 20 FEET z ^ Iw #i ` I In `" 8 ew'xs so \ o.;. C ✓ PNG�� SG 22 r• / / T- --- L=29.,, LOT 1 \ \\ 0-0� 0��� / -- ' , 0 r i , ! 94.. 894000 e=1311'1Y Ft. \ Z ; , ;' (i a10,152 Sq. IZLU,E ::.. 0 V 15 TROS Iii i 2.5' WIDE PUBLIC ACCESS .......... 0 p2. �/ 1rp a�0 Ito AND UTILITY EASEMEN PER 1 � MINOR SUBDIVISION No 35A JgO�P� °QE(R G� ;. s 6 X I ..._.ram..: I `` "'' T 9 g . - ��m: LOT 2 \\ °�� ��� oGX\AS/ SIGN G����� ARP �2a1228 W 0 . ;I: ':. a... os�:. ` `'L 4 Ft 10.497 Sq Ft. .. 1 q ;... / .moo ...........-_. ................... \ / 2.94 S � ��� \ �- \ LOT 8 00.E \ \ / / N i. . ; 12,784 Sq Ft. 1a, i UNPLATTED I ` ` UY IZOT ,5� \ w `:. GU o GOLDENSTEIN Q / l Q /1 � S bb LIMITED ( 'ti; ; ; I N 218,249 5q"'Ft. \ O Set C& / PARTNERSHIP '; �� �8" Re I qii es \p I lZ , 5 0103 Acres , �. LOT 3 _ \ baEX. ZONING: l� S I i ; ':i i !%' 90.18 090'00'00' 126.75 090'00'00" trni a ' \ Is O os... /.y 13`'758 Sq. Ft. O \ �o o (CITY) ........._......._.. TEMPORARY EASEMENT e p ............... .... `' FOR CUL—DE—SAC PER \ \\ MINOR SUBDIVISION No. f cy \ : .._..... ........... !� Y ! 154 Ir, °1 , 0p � a OPEN SPACE ............ if iI 356 ;' t 54.84 BT32'3tl' LOT 7. , LOT 6 L ,� m i n rn I i t / \�` ,L SUNDANCE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION ' F I iT! a a 14,034 Sq. Ft. 16,883 Sq. Ft. \\9 1 ! h I : ! t � ,ice � O '•:i` O a: Q � SLOT; 4 ;�� \�'� .,.• \ s.. \ 16.844/Sq. Ft:�� \ : O I .. L-26.24 e=5'S9' " ........, .....I i% i L=29.03 Scale In Feet i pj I e e_u e�x a / e..SS 8 0 8 _ _>z3 s 8'"' 11 ` ' a, \ `+ °?OMEN S CAE 2 \ �I m "LO T�•5 ,.' , Scale In Meters +; ''� \ 1z3So_ s3.eo ,,3 519 Sq.-Ft. \— — _ — — _ /11n 'l/1.+! �'g� f 3,174;Sq. Ft.'L�� �' ;a`>: 4 I PROPOSED TRAIL POST \ m• 2� + yeti , {9.55/�^ �r "SS g "S `• ON AND WASTE STATION \ MALL ROPbsED.... PARK � ;"= r �' \ DELIVERY LOCATION........ t °sew — — — — e'er `; ':::-`"'— Fnd. RPC — i 1 — — — I y / 4 PROPOSED 30' - 10' Wide Utility7-7 N r Minor S Ivi I — �• _ ._.._... ... ...,pe ubd 's'on No 35 A \\ � Di,( �• �± 3 � 8�18 �'• '� fT � � \ S� - - - - - - - - - - - - -SEWER EASEMENTr - - 0 6' �n°nse_3§�-4°-- - - `� fi R..... . OPEN "SPACE . Engineering and Surveying Inc. Fnd Gaston YPC + %` OPEN SPACE < :'%'' i. 9 9 Y 9 Fn > ':!-:```' ;; ! Si.NDANGE SPRINGS SUBDIVISION / .., ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL LOT 2 .... "' ;'` 1091 Stoneridge Drive-Bozeman, MT 59718 Go on Y C ` nd. RPC No. 3111 ES Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(406)587-9768 6' de Trail POINT OF BEGINNING vwwv.chengineers.com-info@chengineers.com Sheet I Of �� l O #11489 SURVEY REQUESTED BY OWNER TO • • RY PLA T OF CREATE 9 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUED/V/S/ON LOTS FROM AN EXISTING TRACT OF- RECORD. BEING AN AMENDED PLAT OF LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 35-C ' R: JOE OC. N0. 2237386 AHAR D LOCH TED IN THE NE 114, SECTION 25, T. 2 S., R. 5 E. OF P.M.M., GALLA TIN COUNTY, MONTANA REF.: D 3FMO/yTgNq CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR I, Mark A. Chandler, Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor No. 9518ES, do hereby certify that between d January 1, 2011 and June ____, 2013, this survey was prepared under my direct supervision, and I CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION o n d CERTIFICATE OF WAIVER MARK A. o have platted the some as shown on the accompanying plat, and as described, in accordance with the mo �AND�R r provisions of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Sections 76-3-101 through 76-3-625, M.C.A., I, the undersigned property owner, do hereby certify that I have caused to be surveyed, subdivided and platted n 9518ES and the Bozeman Municipal Code. into lots, parcels, roads and other divisions and dedications, as shown by this plat hereunto included, the NA. � following described tract of land, to wit: �L9 RfG)STER�'O �O Dated this day of 2013. � �P Mark A. Chandler LEGAL DESCRIPTION G/NEER PN� Montana Registration No. 9518ES LOT 4A, MINOR SUBDIVISION 35C, according to the plat thereof, on file and of record in the office of the Clerk CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 25, Township 2 South, Range PROF MONTgy 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. q I, Joe Mahar, and I, Mark A. Chandler, a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Montano, do hereby certify that the improvements, required as a condition of approval of this Area = 218,250 square feet, 5.0103 acres, or 20,276.1 square meters. Subject to existing easements. o% MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLAT, have been bonded. The subdivider hereby warrants against defects in these MARK A. o o C'�ANDLER r improvements for a period of one year from the date of installation. The subdivider grants possession The above described tract of land is to be known and designated as ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION, City of m > of all public infrastructure improvements to the City of Bozeman, and the City hereby accepts Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and the lands included in all streets, avenues, alleys and porks or public N No. 951SES possession of all public infrastructure improvements, subject to the above indicated warranty. squares shown on said plat are hereby granted, donated, and dedicated to the City of Bozeman for the public O use and enjoyment. y9� �Fc)STER�`'�P�O Dated this day of 2013. FNG/ Mark A. Chandler The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person, firm or corporation, whether public or private, NEER PN providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas, internet, cable television, or other similar utility or Montana Registration No. 9518ES service, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of their Joe Mahar lines and other facilities, in, over, under and across each area designated on this plat as 'Utility Easement' to have and to hold forever. CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS the undersigned property owner of this Major Subdivision, do hereby waive the right to protest creation of a I, Director of Public Service, City of Bozeman, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat l y Wide Park Maintenance District for maintenance and upkeep of dedicated park land and trail system. In doing has been duly examined and has found the same to conform to law, approves it, and hereby accepts so, I do not waive any right to comment on, protest, and/or appeal any assessment formula which may be the dedication to the City of Bozeman for the public use of any and all lands shown on the plat as proposed, if I believe it to be inequitable. This waiver shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns, and purchasers of being dedicated to such use. all lots within this Subdivision. Dated this day of 2013. Director of Public Works City of Bozeman, Montana Dated this day of 2013. Joe Mahar CERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW STATE OF MONTANA GALLATIN COUNTY ELLIS VIEW ESTATES SUBDIVISION, Gallatin County, Montano, is within the City of Bozeman, Montana, a first—class municipality, and within the planning area of the Bozeman growth policy which was adopted pursuant to Section 76-1-601 et seq., M.C.A., and can be provided with adequate storm water drainage and adequate municipal This instrument was signed or acknowledged before me on this ____ day of _______________ 2013, by facilities. Therefore, under the provisions of Section 76-4-125(2)(d) M.C.A., this subdivision is excluded from the Joe Mahar, member of Mahar Montana Homes. requirement for Montana Department of Environmental Quality review. __________ _________________ Residing at: ------------------ Dated this day of 2013. Notary Public for the State of Montano Director of Public Works City of Bozeman, Montana Printed Name: __________________ My commission expires: _________ CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER I, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the land to be subdivided have been paid. Dated this day of 2013. By: Deputy Treasurer of Gallatin County CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER I, Charlotte Mills, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was filed in my office at _ _ o'clock __.M. this __ _ day of _____________I A.D., 2013, and recorded in Book _____ of Plats, on Page Engineering and Surveying Inc. records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. 1091 Stoneridge Drive•Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone(406)587-1115•Fax(4061 587-9768 Document Number ------------- By: vwvw.chengineers.com•info@chengineers.com Sheet 2 of 2 Deputy Clerk and Recorder #11489 Chris Saunders Subject: Task & Development List Status: In Progress Percent Complete: 2.5% Total Work: 0 hours Actual Work: 0 hours Owner: Tom Rogers Procedural requirements for development review 1. Notice 2. Routing 3. General correspondence 4. Staff Reports a. Outline! See notes on subject b. General content C. Scope d. "Standard" conditions of approval for Sub, CUP,etc. e. Good example? f. 5. Timing of reports, notices, 6. Support expectations and resources 7. Review and editing of work—who is responsible, how much lead time, Support Documentation—Grasp where all resources are located and how to access such as: 1. GIS 2. Plans and policies 3. CIP 4. Corridor plans 5. Growth Policy 6. Interdepartmental 1. Personal development 2. Understanding of core proficiencies of team members 3. Develop Director relationship 4. Learn names of cast of characters: a. Engineering b. Building c. HR d. Commission e. PB f. DRC g. DRB h. Parks& Rec i. Zoning Commission j• 5. General roles of team members 6. 1 Plan & Regulatory Comprehension 1. UDC 2. Corridor studies 3. Location and intent of overlay areas, neighborhood plans, specific neighborhood plans Departmental Objectives 1. Work plan? 2. Historic and projected application numbers 3. Revenue source(s) of department 4. Key issues to be aware of such as"pet peeves" of Commission, other staff members, management, other Departments 5. 2 *DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITT19 MEETING REVIEW SHEET Date: _6/19/2013_ Project Name: Ellis View Estates preliminary PUD plan Prepared by: Chris Saunders File #Z-13131 Owners/Applicants/Representatives Present: cc kler DRC Members Present: ❑ 4PJf7-,', ,)2A n Ad—, Project Engineer Sohn Alston, Water/Sewer Superintendent p/John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent 6,dreg Megaard, Assist. Dir. Public Safety/Inspections &Brian Krueger, Development Review Manager 2-Kob Risk, Chief Building Official Vhom White, Parks Superintendent Levin Handelin, Sanitation Superintendent Meeting Notes: —D�-. -'2v p — f d,,r�s,a,, 7'~ g� -fe 1 �)) L�C C �b •Grl sr/Je a, S D w i. S l So7�. c e.. ZI /hle'!*d Xt'.,T0-C d GlfA l�crr� P lc�,olSlcii•, re� , r A)Cif I G Nd," IQ— 41Z 'A' 'C y� -C-. GC b,2 7, C 6—, 1w7 n aT . d.,c rc -4 . 6 oil e P.,1 <1IP.� Gam✓ e �iS� Ir. p01'� '3,�. ��ctGr,n7/h1J ,S l.)y Ji.? r e s? �-Q r e l c ��rDr. - S C a-� I.+e o b7u c r l c e.q r /„k c /a,. 'totlti►SiDh 'l� SoaTk Jjgv-dv- tatd., LJ��eI �.eJ qeGc st -/-Z� DRC 0f