Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout638300221624239308) CUP for FUD wIRELAXFi.TIODIS Baxter/oak/I l th/I5t ' PT Land (Jerry PerkinsF September 15, 2GOG N O Ut N W O Y , FILE REVIEW-' HEET PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT* J File Name: /��2 O4 0 File Number: Reference Files: Date Date Done N/A Due Done By Accept for initial review letter (5 working days after application deadlirr) ❑ Adequate for continued review letter(20 working days after application deadline) ❑ DRC initial week.review I� i� ❑ DRC second week review ,� 'i ❑ DRC final week review to; ❑ DRB staff report due ❑ DRB meeting O El WRB review—if applicable `� ❑ Comments from other review agencies due ❑ Prepare project map for notices- ❑ Notice to applicant and adjouiers (not less than 15 or more than 45 Nvorking days ❑ before the City Commission hearingl Post notice (not less than 15 or more than 45 working days before the City El dpssion hearino Newspaper notice (not less than 15 or more than 45 working days before the Citv ti�l�� Commission hearing) D�a .�a El City Commission staff report due \� ❑ City Commission hearing date ❑ Final approval letter to applicant ❑ Recommended Recommended Approval Recommended Date N/A Approval with Conditions Denial DRC action ❑ DRB action ❑ WRB action ❑ Approved Approved with Conditions Denied Date City Commission action Date Final Site Plan due: Date of Final Site Plan approval: Date Final Site Plan approval expires: Improvements Agreement required? ❑ Yes ❑ No Date returned: Date financial guarantee received: Date financial guarantee expires: Date financial guarantee released: Date Temporary Occupancy is granted: Date Filial Occupancy is granted: Project Activitu LO Elm - City of f)ozeman ® ® Department of Planning& Community Development Project Name: 9,1,L D File No: z Date Activity Staff Staff Cumulative Members Hours Hours 17 2 J 3-?ice co- S I i i i i I i i Date Ac Suff Staff Cumulative 'Member(s) OHours Hours Project: € S u PKd-, 2-01a 0 File#: qw. 1 i nAl d ` Review for completeness by If complete, return to front office for file. If incomplete, write/contact applicant and explain why by Deadlines: (from date received) Week 2: Week 3: Week 4: COA Classification: Fence Window/Egress Sign Other 1 5 To DRC: 101P X p ov To DRB: DRB Report Due: To Planning Board: Planning Board Report Due: To Zoning Commission: Zoning Commission Report Due: To City Commission: en..�aKt U* 0 City Commission Packet Due: 2 a City Commission Work Session: Public Comment Due: Staff Report Due: Planning Director Decision Due: Notice to Paper: . i(b 7i� (D Notice to Adjoiners: 10 Post Site: Acceptance Letter: Adequate Letter: t-0 �y -,� . _PCo23q. BUZ�'. THE CITY OF BOZEMAN Vti 9x - 20 E. OLIVE • P.O. BOX 1230 " BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771.1230 88 '�� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CO 0 PHONE: (406) 582-2280 • FAX: (406) 582.2263 2Z •• b (0 2 3 MEMORANDUM May 22, 2008 To: Chris Saunders, Assistant Director of Planning From: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer Re: PT Land PUD Impact Fee Credit Request Upon review of the impact fee credit request application for the above mentioned project, city engineering finds the cost estimate for the signal acceptable. This estimate was previously accepted with improvements agreement for the subdivision and speaking with the design engineer it seems that the bids received have come in under the original estimate. Please contact me if you have any questions. cc: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Project File ERF HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK ., CITY OAZEMAN ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPME Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 � P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 " planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM To: Dustin Johnson,Project Engineer Chief Building Official John Alston,Water/Sewer Superintendent Greg Megaard,Assistant Director of Public Safety/Inspections John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent CC: Building Department Project Permit Coordinator From: Brian Krueger, Associate Planner Date: February 4,2008 Subject: The PT Lands PUD, #Z-06230 Attached, please find the approved PUD Final Site Plan for the above referenced project. If you do not wish to keep your copy,please return to me. Two (2) signed originals have been-forwarded to the City of Bozeman Building Department, who may proceed with accepting applications for building permits for lots 1 and 3. A no-build restriction has been placed on all other lots until the necessary improvements are completed.. Building Division: This project was NOT approved for installation of infrastructure concurrently with Building Permits in accordance with Section 18.74.030.C.b and c. Please CHECK WITH ENGINEERING & PLANNING to ensure that all required conditions are met before the actual issuance of any Building Permits. planning zoning subdivision review • annexation 9 historic preservation 9 housing grant administration neighborhood coordination CITY OZEMAN DEPAR ENT OF PLANNING AND COM NITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 " P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net February 4, 2008 Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Attn: Molly Skorpik 3011 Palmer St. Missoula, MT 59808 RE: The PT Lands PUD #Z-06230 Dear Sirs: On February 4, 2008, the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application #Z-06230, with relaxations, was approved and signed by the Director of Planning & Community Development based on the fulfillment of conditions and code provisions. No modifications to the approved plans can be made without prior written approval from the Planning Office. Two copies of the approved and signed final PUD plan have been forwarded to the Building Department to be attached to your application for Building Permits. Please be aware that all lots, must be approved as Site Plans by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building permits. The PT Lands PUD was NOT approved for the installation of infrastructure concurrently with Building . Permits in accordance with Section 18.74.030.0 of the Unified Development Ordinance. As such, no building permits may be issued until all infrastructure improvements are completed and accepted by the City If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact our office. Thank . you. Sincer , 7 Brian Krueger Associate Planner cc: Dustin Johnson,Project Engineer PT Land,Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue,Bozeman, MT 59715-5757 planning zoning subdivision review . annexation historic preservation housing grant administration neighborhood coordination 0 CITY AOZEMAN . DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net. MEMORANDUM TO: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer FROM: Brian Krueger,Associate Planner DATE: January 28, 2007 RE: PT Lands PUD, #Z-06230 Attached,please find a second revised Final PUD Plan for the above r--ferenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. The attached correction letter was mailed to the applicant based upon initial review of the applicant's final site plan submittal. This is what we told them last time: Staff has completed a second review of the proposed Final PUD Plan Application with revisions. The items listed below need to be addressed in the Final PUD Plan package prior to approva;: 1. Regarding Condition #6. A trail cross section detail that meets City Standards shall be provided with the final landscape plan. There appears to be three distinct trail sections that will be required for the PUD: First, 10' wide Class I asphalt for the trail along the Oak Street frontage and associated with Lot 1, Block 1. Second, 10' wide Class I, concrete north side of Tschache Lane, 10' wide Class I asphalt on the southern side of Baxter Lane, and finally a 6' wide Class H gravel fines trail for zone 2 of the watercourse setback. Please prox ide the three distinct trail sections and clearly delineate which one will apply to which trail areas shown on the landscape plan. The attached trails standards will help you formulate the cross sections. This has since been clarified by staff that a 5' wide standard boulevard sidewalk is required along the southern side of Bak-ter Lane. 2. The installation of the signal at North 15`h and West Oak Street_ should be included in the proposed improvements for Phase A in the Phasing Schedule. 3. Please provide further documentation verifying that the payment made from PT Lands to Tange Family LLC for improvements to North 1I'h included the Tange Water Payback. planning • zoning 9 subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation 9 housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination A CITY #OZEMAN ` DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 !„ 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 " P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net January 14, 2008 Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Attn: Molly Skorpik 3011 Palmer St. Missoula, MT 59808 Re: PT Lands PUD Final Plan File#Z-06230 Dear Ms. Skorpik: Staff has completed a second review of the proposed Final PUD Plan Application with revisions. The items listed below need to be addressed in the Final PUD Plan package prior to approval: 1. Regarding Condition #6. A trail cross section detail that meets City Standards shall be provided with the final landscape plan. There appears to be three distinct trail sections that will be required for the PUD: First, 10' wide Class I asphalt for the trail along the Oak Street frontage and associated with Lot 1, Block 1. Second, 10' wide Class 1, concrete north side of Tschache Lane, 10' wide Class I asphalt on the southern side of Baxter Lane, and finally a 6' .wide Class II gravel fines trail for zone 2 of the watercourse setback. Please provide the three distinct trail sections and clearly delineate which one will apply to which trail areas shown on the landscape plan. The attached trails standards will help you formulate the cross sections. 2. The installation of the signal at North 15°i and West Oak Street should be included in the proposed improvements for Phase A in the Phasing Schedule. 3. Please provide further documentation verifying that the payment made from PT Lands to Tange Family LLC for improvements to North I I"' included the Tange Water Payback. Thank you and feel free to contact me at 406-582-2260 if you have any additional questions. I will leave the binders at the front counter of the Planning Office for you or your representatives to pick up, correct, and resubmit. Please note that I have kept one copy of the proposed Final Site Plan Binder for our files; therefore, if you reuse pages,you will need to ensure that a total of seven new copies are resubmitted. Sincerely, Brian Krueger Associate Planner CC: PT Land,Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT .59715-5757 planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grait administration neighborhood coordination og so2�, THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ti 9 20 E. OLIVE• P.O. BOX 1230 V U x BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771.1230 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CO. 0�1 PHONE: (406) 582-2280 • FAX: (406) 582-2263 January 11, 2008 To: Lanette Windemaker, Contract Planner Brian Krueger, Associate Planner From: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer Re: PT Land Phase I Subdivision Final Plat(Preliminary Plat 9P-06057) PT Land PUD Final Submittal (#Z-06230) City Engineering has reviewed materials submitted for Final Plat and PUD approval for the above mentioned project and find the following comments: 1. The installation of the signal at North 151h and West Oak Street should be included in the proposed improvements for Phase A in the Phasing Schedule. 2. Please provide further documentation verifying that the payment made from PT Lands to Tange Family LLC for improvements to North 111h included the Tange Water Payback. cc: Project File ERF HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 ' P.O. Box 1230 fax 406-582-2263 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net January 2, 2008 Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 3011 Palmer St. Missoula, MT 59808 RE: PT Land Phase 1 Subdivision Final Plat Application (Preliminary Plat #P-06057) Dear Molly: The above-referenced final plat application was received on December 21, 2007, and met the application deadline of 5:00 PM on Wednesday, December 26, 2007. It has been assigned to Contract Planner, Lanette Windemaker. The application was reviewed in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval, submittal checklists and Title 18 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The application does not contain all of the required information, but has been deemed adequate for initial review. The following submittal materials and/or information were not provided or need to be clarified: • Fee for Improvements Agreement, when final amount is approved by COB, prior to final plat recordation. • Completed Notary on Certificate of Improvements (wait for initial review to be completed before making any changes to final plat and mylars). • Consent of Mortgagee(s) (wait for initial review to be completed before making any changes to final plat and mylars). • Shouldn't the LOC for the approved Noxious Weed MOU be given to Dennis Hengel? • Will need a PDF of the final plat emailed tome (wait for initial review to be completed before making any changes to final plat and mylars). 25. The applicant shall submit an agreement executed with the adjoining property owner prior to final plat approval of Phase 1 regarding completion of the Tschache Lane crossing of the Walton Stream Ditch. Improvements can be financially guaranteed in accordance with Chapter 18.74, BMC. The full width of both 15th and Tschache must be constructed so that they meet at a full standard intersection. (As amended by City Commission.) Will need a copy of the recorded document. c. Covenants, restrictions, and articles of incorporation for the creation of a property owners' association shall be submitted with the final plat application for review and approval by the Planning Office and shall contain, but not be limited to, provisions for assessment, maintenance, repair and upkeep of common open space areas, public parkland/open space corridors, stormwater facilities, public trails, snow removal, and other areas common to the association pursuant to Chapter 18.72 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. • These documents shall include a common area and facility maintenance plan and guarantee for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, and stormwater facilities in accordance with Chapter 18.72 or the Bozeman Municipal Code. planning • zoning . subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration . neighborhood coordination • These documents shall be submitted to the city attorney and shall not be accepted by the city until approved as to legal form and effect. A draft of these documents must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department at least 45 working days prior to filing and recordation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. • These documents shall be executed and submitted with the final plat to be filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder at the time of final plat recordation. Where is the copy of Covenant Exhibit D "Rules and Regulations"found? 1. Articles of Incorporation cannot be recorded without a notary. Originals need to be provided for review of the final plat application can be completed. After we have received all of this information, we will review the application to determine if the submission is acceptable for the review process to continue. After the application is deemed to be acceptable, the forty-five working days process will commence. Please note, a determination that an application contains adequate information in sufficient detail to be acceptable for'the initial review process to commence does not ensure that the proposed application will be approved by the City of Bozeman, and does not limit the ability of the City of Bozeman to request additional information during the review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 586-5266. Sincerely, i Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner Cc: PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-5757 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 Page 2 of 2 CI*F BOZEMAN ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 Mo 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.nef October 16, 2007 Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Attn: Molly Skorpik 3011 Palmer St. Missoula, MT 59808 Re: PT Lands PUD Final Plan File #Z-06230 Lot 1 Block 1 of PT Land Subdivision Dear Ms. Skorpik: Staff has completed a review of the proposed Final PUD Plan Application. The items listed below need to be addressed in the Final PUD Plan package prior to approval: 1. General. The application submitted with the Final PUD Plan is incorrect. The application submitted is the development review application for preliminary approval. Please utilize the attached Final Site Plan application for the Final PUD Plana There is a box to check in that application for PUD. Applicant and property owner signature required. 2. Regarding Condition #1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines do not state "Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted." as required in the Service Warehouse neighborhood on page 45 and in the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood on page 48. 3. Regarding Condition #1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines do not state "Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background is not permitted." as required in the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood on page 48. 4. Regarding Condition #2. There is an error in the wording regarding low profile monument signs in the Service Warehouse Neighborhood on page 45. It should state "Only Low profile monument freestanding signs allowed." 5. "Regarding Condition #2. There is an error in the wording regarding low profile monument signs in the Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood on page 46. It should state "Only Low profile monument freestanding signs allowed." Pole style signs are not allowed in this neighborhood per the condition. 6. Regarding Condition #2. There is an error in the wording regarding low profile monument signs in the Support Services Neighborhood on page 48. It should state "Only Low profile monument freestanding signs allowed." Pole style signs are not allowed in E is neighborhood per the condition. 7. Regarding Condition #3. Although the development guidelines include visual examples, photos, and thumbnail sketches there are no visual examples, photos, and thumbnail sketches that provide information on building materials and colors. 8. Regarding Condition #3. A set of figures is utilized for both the Support Services Neighborhood and Service Warehouse Neighborhood. There should be different sets of figures for each neighborhood in order to identify the differences between the .anticipated developments in these areas. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination Y 9. Regarding Condition #4. The guidelines do not clearly demonstrate the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood and the Support Services Neighborhood. Provide additional visual examples, photos, and thumbnail sketches that demonstrate the anticipated differences between these neighborhoods. 10. Regarding Condition #6. The landscape plan and watercourse setback planting plans does not clearly delineate the watercourse itself, the watercourse setback including the adjacent wetlands per 18.42.100.B.3.d.2., and Zone 1 and Zone 2 that incorporate the wetland areas. Please clearly delineate all wetlands on the landscaping plans. 11. Regarding Condition #6. A trail cross section detail that meets City Standards shall be provided with the final landscape plan. 12. Regarding Condition #6. The landscape plan does not provide any details for the required landscaping or planting for the detention ponds per page 21 of the Design Objectives Plan(DOP) for Entryway Corridors. See guideline E.2 on page 21. Each pond shall be detailed. 13. .Regarding Condition #6. Staff acknowledges that the necessary points for plantings have been achieved on the open space lots. The layout of the plantings seems awkward in the south yard configuration. For Open Space 2 staff suggests distributing the required yard plantings around the detention pond at the southern end of Open Space 2 in order to blend it into the landscape and bolster the plantings required by Guideline E.2 on page 21 of the DOP. For Open Space 1 staff suggests that the required southern yard plantings be allocated along the proposed trail corridor. For Open Space 3, 15 points has yet to be earned for this lot. 14. Regarding Condition #6. Provide a phasing plan for the landscape plantings in the open space lots and a proposed schedule for installation of the detention pond landscaping. 15. Regarding Condition #.14. No Tab 14 found. No design for the 27 ft. back of curb to back of curb exhibit found in the application. 16. Regarding Code Provision b. See comments above regarding Condition #6. Thank you and feel free to contact me at 406-582-2260 if you have any additional questions. I will leave the binders at the front counter of the Planning Office for you or your representatives to pick i UP, correct, and resubmit. Please note that I have kept one copy of the proposed Final Site Plan Binder for our files; therefore, if you reuse pages, you will need to ensure that a total of seven new copies are resubmitted. Sincerely, Brian Krueger W. Associate Planner CC: PT Land,Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue,Bozeman, MT 59715-5757 Page 2 0 W CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 ' P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozemon.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net FINAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: 2. Property Owner Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 3.Applicant Information: Name: E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Legal Description: 5. Street Address: F. Project Type: ❑ Site Plan ❑ Site Plan/COA ❑ CUP ❑ CUP/COA ❑PUD ❑ Other: 7. Project Description: 8. For condominiums: Is a digital copy of the layout attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 9.A written narrative addressing how all of the conditions of approval ❑ Yes ❑ No and code provisions have been addressed is attached? Certification of Completion and Compliance—I understand the conditions of approval and the submitted final site plan or master site plan have complied with any conditions of approval or corrections to comply with code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Site Plan — I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final site plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: (Final Site Plan Application—Prepared 12/10/03;revised 01/05/05;revised 01/19/07) Page 1 of 1 Brian Krueger From: Lanette Windemaker Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:10 PM To: Brian Krueger Subject: PT Lands/Perkins Final PUD Plan Brian, I have received a copy of the Final Plat for this Phase 1 of this property. It wall be found to be unacceptable, but I did have a couple of questions about the status of the Final PUD Plan. Could we schedule a couple of minutes to sit down and discuss the status? Where is it in the review process? Does the landscaping of the storm water detention facilities comply with our requirements? With my submittal they are showing me the two on the west side of the property, one each N & S of the future Tschache. Is the asphalt path along Oak in the ROW, or does it meander outside of the ROW? .Have they made corrections to the covenants that meet your needs? Do the Design Guidelines meet your needs? Thanks. Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner 586-5266 9/11/2007 j CIT&F BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT hone 406-582-2260 Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2263 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 n/J anning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-12 IECE � VV www.bozeman.net MEMO RA MSEP 0 5 2007 DEPAITr ap&- Dustin Jo risongirojePtiEngineer AND CCtvt cVEI . N Mpg. hn ston,W ter/Sewer Superin endent i Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Greg Megaard, Fire Marshall Ryon Stover, City Forester �?\ C`�1 �� ©`1< M.70-� Brian Krueger,Associate Planner DATE: August 21, 2007 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan, #Z-07080 Attached, please find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. Please note that the City Commission on December 6, 2006 approved the Preliminary PUD Plan with the following conditions of approval and code provisions: PUD Plan Conditions of Approval: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed,however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials, colors,architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood(yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1- 5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with �18.78.100 and �18.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossi---ig on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. planning - zoning - subdivision review - annexation - historic preservation - housing - grant administration - neighborhood coordination 8. The Final PUD Plan shall roe the construction of a mid block crol n Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestr ns. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with§18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to 518.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of 518.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14th Avenue to North 15,h Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission.) PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Page 2 rl North 19th Avenue/West Oa�et Corridor Master Plan. The applicant sh cument the provision of performance points. A table shWFmg the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association.Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements"located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 3 FA- f CI1*F BOZEMAN . DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net MEMORAN C E U Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer F PLANNING John Alston,Water/Sewer Superintende t AND COMMUNITY ODEVELOPMENT Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official rfl-1, ftJohn Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent C4„ (/ Greg Megaard, Fire Marshall _ Ryon Stover, City Forester &YAW Ip Brian Krueger,Associate Planner DATE: August 21, 2007 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan, #Z-07080 Attached, please find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. Please note that the City Commission on December 6, 2006 approved the Preliminary PUD Plan with the following conditions of approval and code provisions: PUD Plan Conditions of Approval: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed,however a system that backlights sign test only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. f 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in�the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses,and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials, colors, architectural details,etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1- 5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the I-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with 518.78.100 and 518.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 8. The Final PUD Plan shall r the construction of a mid block cross�n Block 3 at the time of site t development in accordance vw §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Blocl,- 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to 518.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of 518.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14,h Avenue to North 15th Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added¢y City Commission.) PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7,h Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E,all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Page 2 'A . North 19th Avenue/West Oa t Corridor Master Plan. The applicant sb1fcluded ocument the provision of performance points. A table *eg the computed PUD open space shall on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19Ch Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 3 40 CI*F BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer i John Alston,Water/Sewer Superintendent 4�� Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official ^-�7 v .L�i I n�rt John Vandelinder, Streets Su erintendent ��• . ,reg eg ard, .ir arsha FFSEP 0 s1 2001 jQ• Ryon Stover, City Forester DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Fl Brian Krueger,Associate Planner AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: August 21, 2007 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan, #Z-07080 Attached, please find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. Please note that the City Commission on December 6, 2006 approved the Preliminary PUD Plan with the following conditions of approval and code provisions: PUD Plan Conditions of Approval: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transidoning of uses,and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials, colors, architectural details,etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1- 5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with 518.78.100 and 518.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with�18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination 8. The Final PUD Plan shall roe the construction of a mid block crosoon Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with �18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with 5118.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to 518.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman, Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of�18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14th Avenue to North 15th Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added ly City Commission.) PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or-site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E,non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Page 2 North 19th Avenue/West Oaloet Corridor Master Plan. The applicant sh*cument the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19,h Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located-on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 3 f� CI*F BOZEMAN `-v DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT hone 406-582-2260 Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582=2263 20 East Olive Street P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM TO: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer John Alston, Water/Sewer Superintend n Neil Poulsen, C•1uef Bu lding OO fficial v IE John Valinder, Streets Superintend nde AUG Greg Megaard, Fire Marshall 2007 Ryon Stover, City Forester DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING FROM: Brian Krueger,Associate Planner AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: August 21, 2007 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan, #Z-07080 Attached, please find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. Please note that the City Commission en December 6, 2006 approved the Preliminary PUD Plan with the following condi6ons of approval and code provisions: PUD Plan Conditions of Approval: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitionmg of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials, colors, architectural details,etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood(yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1- 5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with 518.78.100 and 518.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a crud block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. planning - zoning - subdivision review . annexation - historic preservation - housing - grant administration - neighborhood coordination w 8. The Final PUD Plan shall roe the construction of a mid block crossoon Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with �18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that urunet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of§118.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 141h Avenue to North 15th Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission.) PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E,non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Page 2 North 19th Avenue/West Oaloet Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shocument the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association.Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 3 i� CI&F BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional B ' phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street C fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 I planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771LUMSEPLO6 2007 www.bozeman.net MEMO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING TO: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer John Alston,Water/Sewer Superintendent Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Greg Megaard, Fire Marshall 1%yon St uer, City F.o es er FROM: Brian Krueger,Associate Planner DATE: August 21, 2007 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan, #Z-07080 Attached, please find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. Please note that the City Commission on December 6, 2006 approved the Preliminary PUD Plan with the following conditions of approval and code provisions: PUD Plan Conditions of Approval: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally 1uminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials,colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor(blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood(yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1- 5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor; and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with 518.78.100 and 518.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. planning - zoning - subdivision review - annexation - historic preservation - housing - grant administration - neighborhood coordination 8. The Final PUD Plan shall retie the construction of a mid block crossoon Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with �18.48.0503 and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional- use permit procedure pursuant to 518.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to§18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of§18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 141h Avenue to North 15th Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission) PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Page 2 North 19th Avenue/West Oalleet Corridor Master Plan. The applicant sheocument the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19,h Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor,shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 3 C. CI*F BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer John Alston,Water/Sewer Superintendent Neil Poulsen, Chief Building Official John Vandelinder, Streets Superintendent Greg Megaard, Fire Marshall Ryon Stover, City Forester FROM: Brian Krueger,Associate Planner DATE: August 21, 2007 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan, #Z-07080 Attached, please find the proposed Final PUD Plan for the above referenced project. Please review and return to me with any comments. Please note that the City Commission on December 6, 2006 approved the Preliminary PUD Plan with the following conditions of approval and code provisions: PUD Plan Conditions of Approval: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed,however a system that backlights sign test only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally ilunuinated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses,and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials, colors,architectural details,etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the cifferences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor(blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood(yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1- 5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with 518.78.100 and 518.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. planning - zoning - subdivision review - annexation - historic preservation - housing - grant administration 9 neighborhood coordination 8. The Final PUD Plan shall Ore the construction of a mid block cross's 9 on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with§18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to§18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and reverenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not,in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of§18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14th Avenue to North 15,h Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission) PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 71h Avenue,and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E,all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot,and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E,non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas,and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the Page 2 y North 19th Avenue/West Cletreet Corridor Master Plan.The applicant s a document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19,h Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor,at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor,shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association.Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements"located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1)year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval,a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 3 - CITY OF&ZEMAN N DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 " P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net July 6, 2007 PT Land Jerry Perkins 511 North Wallace Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715-5757 RE: PT Land Final PUD Plan Application Dear Jerry: The above-referenced final PUD plan application was received on June 29, 2007, and met the application deadline of 5:00 PM on Thursday, July 5, 2007. It has beer. assigned to Contract Planner, Lanette Windemaker. The application was reviewed in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval, submittal checklists and Title 18 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The application does not contain all of the required information and has been deemec unacceptable for initial review. The following submittal materials and/or information were not provided or need to be clarified: Pursuant to Section 18.78.120.C. the following information is req--irec fo_ Final PUD Plan review and approval, and was not provided with this submittal. 2. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or offs:ers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners c-f th,_PUD. 4.d. Open Space Maintenance Plan. The following conditions of preliminary approval were not adequately acdressed in the submittal. 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address ill-umiliat_on and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs shculd be discouraged and a white background not permitted. Where is this described in your plan? 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monumen- type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. Where is this described in your plan? 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5, Block 1 may be located within th:e West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be ocated witn tie I-90 entryway corridor. There appears to be a discrepancy between the response to this condition and the plan, which is correct? 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • arant administration • neighbo•hood coordination L • • space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with §18.78.100 and §18.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. How are you addressing the requirement for the PUD open space to meet a minimum of 15 landscaping points, not counting the required watercourse setback planting? Where is this shown in your plans? It has been brought to my attention that designing stormwater facilities to meet the current code will provide many landscaping points. 10. That the right to,a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Your revision of the Conditional Use Permit does not meet our requirements,please use the original document we have attached to this letter. In addition, the followings code provisions where not adequately addressed. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. How is the watercourse setback south of Tsehache Lane to be landscaped? c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. The calculations provided in the response appear to be incorrect. 11.83 acres of open space is required if there is no public access, 9.46 acres are required if there is public access. 9.52 acres is 30.2 points with public access, or 9.81 acres is 31.1 points. Where is the table showing the computed PUD open space on the final plan? The land use table provided on the plan appears to be incorrect. How can the open space on Lot 3, Block 4 be larger than the gross area? Why doesn't the usable space and provided open space total the gross area? d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. The calculations provided in Page 2 the response appear to be incorrect. 11.83 acres of open space is required if there is no public access, 9.46 acres are required if there is public access. 9.52 acres is 30.2 points with public access, or 9.81 acres is 31.1 points. Where is the table showing the computed PUD open space on the final plan? The land use table provided on the plan appears to be incorrect. How can the open space on Lot 3, Block 4 be larger than the gross area? Why doesn't the usable space and provided open space total the gross area? e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. Where is this addressed in the plans? The open spaces may not be labeled lot or tract. They must be renamed as Open Space 1, Open Space 2 and Open Space 3. In addition, they must have a note that states 'Public Access". g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. The narrative does not provide adequate detailed information to direct the reviewers to the appropriate plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. After we have received all of this information, we will again review the application to determine if the information is acceptable for initial review. After the application is deemed to contain the required- elements and to be acceptable, it shall be reviewed for adequacy. A determination of adequacy means the application contains all of the required elements in sufficient detail and accuracy to enable the applicable review agency to make a determination that the application either does or does not conform to the requirements of this title and any other applicable regulations under the jurisdiction of the City of Bozeman. Please note, a determination that an application contains adequate information in sufficient detail for review does not ensure that the proposed application will be approved or conditionally approved by the City of Bozeman, and does not limit the ability of the City of Bozeman to request additional information during the review process. The application submittals are available for pick up at the Planning Office. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 586-5266. Sin erely, Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Inc., 3011 Palmer St., Missoula, MT 59808 Page 3 Inter-office Original to: • City of Bozeman • Planning Department P.O. Box 1230 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PT LAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION,#Z-06234 WHEREAS,the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of aCoriditicnal Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified development plan of—47 acre subdivision for the development of 18 commercial and open space lots,with American Federal Savings 3 ik,as the initial phase of the PUD, with the following approved relaxations from the City of L-Dzenan, Municipal Code: a) §18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter La.Ze. b) §18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards,to build Norh 15th Avenue between Oak.St-eet and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a �-0-foot oo lecba'r standard. c) §18.42.040.C. Block Width, to allow blocks of more Laan 400 feet in width tc yiercc-rne specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. d) §18.42.1003.6-.a. Watercourse Setback,to permit on-site s-ormwater treatmnt facilities to be located in Zone 1. e) §18.42.100.B.3.c. Watercourse Setback,to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 710 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. WHEREAS,the subject property is legally described Tracts 2 and 3 of COS 1215 located in Section 1,T2S, R5E, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana.; and WHEREAS,the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following 14 condir_ons and code provisions: Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accord-_ice with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire s gn panel should not al owed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light backgro-and colors cn internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a vvnite background not permitted, PT Land PUD CUP: #Z-06230 ?AGE f 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red)and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5,Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor,and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located'with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots,Lots 2 and 3,Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with§18.78.100 and §18.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development,all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.I of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon PT Land PUD CUP: #Z-06230 PAGE 2 of 5 • the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance: The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of §18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14`" Avenue to North 15`" Avenue. As a PUD,these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission.) Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460,this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 71"Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.0901, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space,exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot,and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.0901, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and PT Land PUD CUP: #Z-06230 PAGE 3 of 5 • contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e: Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19"' Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as"common open space easements"located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final PUD Plan within one(1)year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. WHEREAS,the right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure and shall constitute restrictions running with the land. WHEREAS,all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. WHEREAS,all of the conditions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. WHEREAS, all of the special conditions attached to this Conditional Use Permit shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted 14 conditions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property,my successors or assigns,as long as the subject property is developed under the terms and PT Land PUD CUP: #Z-06230 PAGE 4 of 5 L J , • conditions established by the City Commission in their approval.of the PT Lard Planned Unit Development Subdivision. DATED THIS DAY OF , 2007. PROPERTY OWNER PT Land, a Montana general partnership Jerry Perkins, General Manager 511 North Wallace Street, Bozeman, MT 5971� STATE OF ) :ss County of ) On this day of , 2007, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared Jerry Perkins,known to me to be the General Manager. of PT Land, a Montana general partnership, the partnership that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that-he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (Signature above) (Seal) (Printed Name above) Notary Public for State of Montana Residing at: Commission Expires: (Use 4 digits fo-expiratior=year) PT Land PUD CUP: #Z-06230 PAGE 5 --f 5 CITY OF BOZEMAN Nd DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582.2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net December 21, 2006 PT Land Jerry Perkins 511 North Wallace Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715-5757 RE: PT Land Preliminary PUD Application, 4Z-06230 PT Land Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application,4PA-6057 Dear Jerry: At its December 11, 2006, public hearing, the Bozeman City Commission voted, 5-0 to conditionally approve the PT Land PUD Preliminary Plan. This decision approves relaxations 41. #3, #9, #11, #12 and denies relaxations #2, 44, #5, #6, #7, #8, and #10. Regarding the PT :.and PUD Preliminary Plan, the Planning Director hereby grants approval contingent upon Satisfactorily meeting the following conditions: PT Land PUD Plan Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and colcrirg in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. L_ght backgrcaund colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding s:g:ns in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examp_es/photcs/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate )'ow the dierences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support S-Mices Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with tie entyway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak street entn'way corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with tl_:e I-;'0 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with §18.78.100 and §18.48. Completion of the la:idscapmg in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation 9 historic preservation 9 hausir= • grcni cdm.ristration • neighborhood coordination Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.0503 and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of§18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14`" Avenue to North 15`" Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission) American Federal Bank Site Plan Conditions: 1. The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses and the residential adj acency. 2. The building shall be built with the additional details (metallic insets, precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the simplified color renderings. 3. A material board/color palette for the building, including material samples and color chips, shall be subject to review and approval by the ADR and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan Page 2 A " approval. 4. The northern drive access shall be designed and designated as shared access to North 151h Avenue (or whichevever street is the collector) with the adjoining property to the north. 5. A city standard sidewalk shall be installed along the northern drive lane from North 15th Avenue to North 14th Avenue to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 6. The parking lot and building shall not encroach into the 50 foot landscaped setback along Oak Street. 7. The front yard setback from North 15th Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. 8. Trees shall not be located within 10 feet of sewer, water, and piped stormwater services. Sewer, water, and piped stormwater services shall be shown on the landscaping plans and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. 9. Fire hydrants shall not be located within 10 feet of trees and light fixtures. Fire hydrants shall be shown on landscaping and lighting plans. 10. The final site plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 11. The elevations of American Federal Savings Bank shall be reviewed by the DRB, in accordance with the recommended changes from the informal DRB review on October 25, 2006, before Final Site Plan approval. : t In addition to the specific conditions listed above, the final plan shall comply with the standards identified below and referenced in the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. PT Land PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape profess_onal and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard Page 3 setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. American Federal Bank Site Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.18.050, parking areas shall have a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet from North 15`h Avenue. b. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, street trees characterized by a formal arrangement of large canopy boulevard trees shall be located in the street right-of-way boulevards subject to the following requirements: (1) One large canopy boulevard tree, a minimum of eight(8) feet in height or 1" caliper and planted at regular intervals of fifty (50) feet on center. (2) Acceptable large canopy boulevard trees include the following species: Ash, Patmore Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica); Honeylocust, Seedless (Gleditsia triacanthos); Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra); and Maple,Norway (Acer Platanoides). c. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, the Greenway corridors located in the 50-foot setback will be characterized by informal vegetative planting of trees, shrubs, berms and groundcover for every one Page 4 hundred(100) feet of frontage along the entryway corridors as listed below. (1)A total of four (4) evergreen and deciduous trees at random or in cluster arrangements, with no more than fifty (50%) percent being deciduous, a minimum of 8-10 feet in height, or 1-1/2"caliper; (2)A total of two (2) small ornamental trees at random locations, a minimum of 8 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (3) A total of six (6) deciduous and/or coniferous large shrubs, of which three (3) shall be flowering shrubs, at random locations and a minimum of 8-1/2 feet in height at maturity, 2-3 feet installation size; Or earth berms, an average of 3.5 feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within 3 years. d. Per 18.42.150, additional information on the site lighting (cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. e. Per 18.42.170, the design and location of the trash enclosure is subject to review and approval by the City Sanitation Department, and must be shown on the final site plan. f. Per 18.44.100, sight vision triangles must be correctly depicted on the final site plan. g. Per 18.46.040.C.2, ADR staff approves a 5% reduction in the number of required parking spaces from 42 to 40 in exchange for the provision of 700 square feet of landscaping in addition to the required amount of landscaping. These improvements must be placed in the public right-of-way or yards directly facing the right-of-way. h. Per 18.48.050.B and 060.B.3, screening is required for residential adjacency along the west side in accordance with the landscaping standards. i. Per 18.52.060, a comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two or more tenant spaces on a lot and shall be designed in accordance with §18.52.070, BMC. j. Per 18.52.060, the total permitted signage shall not exceed 400 square feet, and one freestanding sign is permitted. The location of the freestanding sign shall be shown on the Final Site Plan and landscape plan. Signage is subject to ADR review and approval, and a sign permit. k. Per 18.34.140, seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six (6) months of the date of preliminary approval. 1. Per 18.64.100, a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one (1) year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, providing that such activity does not include excavation for foundations or the removal of mature, healthy vegetation, and NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. in. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Site Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary site plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Page 5 Also at its December 11, 2006, public hearing, the Bozeman City Commission voted unanimously, 5-0, to conditionally approve PT Land PUD Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat. Regarding the PT Land PUD Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat, the Planning Director hereby grants approval contingent upon satisfactorily meeting the following conditions. 1. The watercourse setback along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane shall be 50 feet. If a minor reduction is necessary to due to road design geometrics to facilitate the taper angle required between the existing right-of-way alignment of North 15t' Avenue and the continuation of the right- of-way of North 15'h Avenue to achieve a watercourse setback of 50 feet, the watercourse setback for that portion only may be reduced to not less than 35 feet for the minimum distance required to achieved the realignment. 2. A right of way, not less than 10 feet wide, for a city standard sidewalk, is required mid-block in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 3. A Concurrent Construction Plan, for an approved lot-specific final site plan, addressing all requirements of 18.74.030.D, shall be submitted for review and approval of the Planning Director with a recommendation from the Development Review Committee. 4. Storm water retention/detention facilities may be located in Zone 1 of the watercourse setback if located no closer than 50 feet to the ordinary high water mark of the watercourse. The storm water retention/detention ponds shall be designed as landscape amenities. They shall be an organic water feature with a natural, curvilinear shape. The ponds shall have 75 percent of surface area covered with live vegetation, and be lined with native grasses, indigenous plants, wet root tolerant plant types and groupings of boulders to create a functional yet, natural site feature. A cross section and landscape detail of each pond shall be submitted with the final landscape plan for review and approval. (As amended by City Commission.) 5. Covenants shall address the requirements for street trees, a COB planting permit for street trees and obtaining utility locates before any excavation begins in the COB right of way. 6. Water rights, or cash-in-lieu thereof, as calculated by the City Engineer, is due with the final plat. 7. The open space shall be titled "Open Space, Public Access". Notes shall be included on the plat describing ownership and maintenance responsibility for the open space, e.g.: open space, public access, owned by the property owners association, maintained by the property owners association, etc. 8. Subdivision lighting SILD information shall be submitted to the Clerk of Commission directly after Preliminary Plat approval in hard copy and digital form. The final plat will not be deemed complete until the resolution to create the SILD has been approved by the City Commission. 9. Buildings proposed for construction with crawl spaces or basements shall include Engineer Certification regarding depth of ground water and soil conditions and proposed mitigation methods to be submitted with each Building Permit. The Final Plat shall include a notation that due to high ground water conditions full or partial basements are not recommended. Page 6 Y J • 10. Applicant shall provide a soils report, along with building plans, to the Building Division, recommending types of foundations. If development shall occur in phases, the soils report may address those lots within the proposed phase. 11. The remainder of each phase of the subdivision shall be platted as an undevelopable tract in accordance with §18.74.080.B.6, BMC, with the following language placed on the face of the final plat. No public improvements shall be required for the undevelopable tract until it is subdivided as a lot which is not subject to this restriction. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all potential purchasers of Tract X of XXXXX Subdivision Phase X, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, that the final plat of the subdivision was approved by the Bozeman City Commission without completion of on and off-site improvements required under the Bozeman Municipal Code, as is allowed in Chapter 18.74 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. As such, this Restriction is filed with the final plat that stipulates that any use of this lot is subject to further subdivision, and no development of this lot shall occur until all on and off-site improvements are completed as required under the Bozeman Municipal Code. THEREFORE, BE ADVISED, that Building Permits will not be issued for Tract X of XXXXX Subdivision Phase X City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana until all required on and off-site improvements are completed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. No building or structure requiring water or sewer facilities shall be utilized on this lot until this restriction is lifted. This restriction runs with the land and is revocable only by further subdivision or the written consent of the City of Bozeman. (As amended by City Commission.) 12. The final plat shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Engineering Conditions: t. 13. This proposed Subdivision is located within the following payback districts: • Hampton Inn Sewer Payback • Baxter Lane and North 19`h Signal Payback • Tange LLC Water Payback Unless previously filed with the property, the applicant will make all payments necessary prior to each phase. 14. Unless currently filed with the property, the applicant is advised executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of S.I.D.'s shall be provided and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office for the following: a) Intersection improvements at Oak Street and North 7th. b) Intersection improvements at Oak Street and North 19th. c) Intersection improvements at Baxter Lane and North 19th. d) Intersection improvements at Tscache Lane and North 19th. e) Street improvements to Oak Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage Page 7 (unless currently filed with the property). f) Street improvements to Baxter Lane including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage (unless currently filed with the property). g) Intersection improvements at Oak Street and North 15th Avenue. (As amended by City Commission.) The document filed shall specify state that in the event an S.I.D. is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development or a combination thereof. 15. Proposed phasing shall be depicted on the preliminary plan. The full extent of all proposed infrastructure improvements required for each phase shall also be clearly indicated on the final plan submittal. No building permits shall be issued prior to City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless all of the requirements of §18.74.030.D are met to allow for concurrent construction. Phases shall be numbered in the order in which they are to be built. All concurrent construction requirements shall be met or substantial completion of all public infrastructure shall be accepted prior to the issuance of building permits at each phase. 16. Access to Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2, Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 1 from North 15th Ave, and access to Lots 1 and 6 of Block 3 from North 1 lth Ave shall use shared accesses. A one foot no access stripe will be required for the lengths of any proposed lots fronting North 15th or North 1 Ith, excluding the locations of any shared accesses. In addition, all separation requirements outlined in the §18.44.090 of the Bozeman Municipal Code shall be met. If access cannot be achieved within the parameters of the Bozeman Municipal Code the applicant may apply for a deviation. The procedure for applying for an access deviation is outlined in §18.44.090.H.3 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 17. Stormwater Master Plan: A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention/detention basin location, and locate and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin sites, drainage ways, and lot finished grades), typical stormwater retention/detention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within park or open space shall be designed and constructed so as to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the park or open space. Storm water ponds shall not be located on private lots. Detailed review of the final grading and drainage plan and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. Currently, there exists a temporary storm drainage easement on this property for several adjoining streets and a neighboring lot. Prior to development an adequate permanent drainage plan must be Page 8 4 submitted and approved by the City Engineer, and any easements for the temporary ponds must be properly vacated. The preliminary storm water plan submitted with the PUD application does not address the runoff that is currently coming from the adjoining lots and street frontage. 18. The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and all easements shall be clearly and accurately depicted, as well as all nearby existing and proposed fire hydrants. The location of the newly installed Pressure Relief Valve along 11th Avenue must be shown on the plans. 19. The Developer's engineer will be required to prepare a comprehensive design report evaluating existing capacity of water and sewer utilities which must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The report must include hydraulic evaluations of each utility for both existing and post- development demands. The report findings must demonstrate adequate capacity to serve the full development. The report must also identify the proposed phasing of water and sewer construction. If adequate water and/or sewer capacity is not available for full development, the report must identify necessary water system and sewer system improvements required for full development. The Developer will be responsible to complete the necessary system improvements to serve the full development. 20. It should be noted that this site is located in an area of high water pressure. The design of the water infrastructure will need to account for this high pressure. The installation of a pressure reducing valve(s) (PRV) will be required. The location and the number of required PRV's will be determined during the infrastructure design phase. 21. Easements needed for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of the easement. All necessary easements shall be provided prior to Final plat approval and shall be shown on the plat. 22. All water main extensions of more than 500 feet required for any phase of the development shall be fully looped. Water and sewer mains shall be extended to the property lines to adequately accommodate future extensions and/or looping. 23. City Standard curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be provided along all streets in the subdivision, unless otherwise noted. Streets within the subdivision will be City standard width. Detailed review of the street and intersection design and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. 24. Tschache Lane must be extended the entire length of the subdivision, so as to connect North 15th Ave. to North 11 th Ave. 25. The applicant shall submit an agreement executed with the adjoining property owner prior to final plat approval of Phase 1 regarding completion of the Tschache Lane crossing of the Walton Stream Ditch.. Improvements can be financially guaranteed in accordance with Chapter 18.74, BMC. The full width of both 15th and Tschache must be constructed so that they meet at a full standard intersection. (As amended by City Commission.) Page 9 26. North 15th Ave., or a comparable collector standard public street, must be extended to the north so as to connect Oak Street to Baxter Lane. All wetlands regulations and stream setbacks must be abided by when considering the alignment of these roads. All alignments and designs of these roads must be reviewed and approved by the city engineering department. This street section must include a back of curb to back of curb width of a minimum of 42', bike lanes, and sidewalks on both sides. (As amended by City Commission.) 27. All street names must be approved by the Gallatin County Road Office and City Engineering Department prior to preliminary plat and final plat approval. 28. The traffic study submitted indicates that North 11 th Avenue and North 15th Avenue currently have Level of Services (LOS) below a D. §18.44.060.D of the Bozeman Municipal Code states "Street and intersection level of service "C" shall be the design and operational objective, and under no conditions will less than level of service "D" be accepted. The LOS for these intersections must be corrected prior to the issuance of building permits for any of this development. 29. The traffic study submitted indicates that the intersection of Oak and N. 19th operates at a level of service below a D. Since the traffic study was performed the intersection has had improvements. Please reevaluate the intersection to confirm that intersection operates at or above a LOS of D at all times. If the intersection remains at a LOS below a D the developer will be required to make improvements to the intersection to correct the LOS. 30. Any public street.rights of way for which easements have been provided shall be dedicated to the City on the preliminary Plat for this subdivision. 31. A 10 foot wide asphalt pathway must be installed the length of the lot on the south side of the property along Oak Street. This pathway must provide ADA approved access the entire length of the lot. 32. The full width of Baxter Lane that fronts this proposed subdivision shall be improved to meet all current collector standards. This includes but not limited to pavement, curb and gutter, and all necessary signage and striping. The typical section used for the Baxter Lane improvements should match the typical section used at the Lowe's Subdivision directly west of this development. 33. With the improvements to Baxter the developer will install sidewalk on the north side of the street from the end of the existing sidewalk west of this development to N. 15th, where a pedestrian crosswalk will be installed. The developer shall install the crosswalk with adequate signage, striping, and lighting such that the intersection will provide safe passage for pedestrians. With installation of this crosswalk the existing mid-block crosswalk west of this development will be removed. 34. If construction activities related to the project result in the disturbance of more than 1 acre of natural ground, an erosion/sediment control plan may be required. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality may need to be contacted by the Applicant to determine if a Stormwater Discharge Permit is necessary. If a permit is required by the State, the Developer shall demonstrate to the City full permit compliance. Page 10 35. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to final approval. 36. A 10-foot wide concrete shared use boulevard sidewalk/path shall be constructed on the north side of Tschache Lane. It is preferable that this sidewalk meander similar to the design on the property to the west. A public access easement shall be provided for areas where the sidewalk meanders outside of the public right-of-way. (As added by City Commission.) 37. The applicant shall incorporate changes required by the conditional approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the PT Land Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan. (As added by City Commission.) In addition to the specific conditions listed above, the final plat shall comply with the standards identified below and referenced in the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. a. Per §18.42.150 of the BMC, street light support structures shall not exceed 25 feet on local streets and are only required at street and pedestrian intersections. Additional information on the street lighting (cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. b. Per §18.50.090 of the BMC, executed waivers of right to protest creation of special improvement districts (SIDs) for a park maintenance district shall be executed and submitted with the final plat to be filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder at the time of final plat recordation. c. Covenants, restrictions, and articles of incorporation for the creation of a property owners' association shall be submitted with the final plat application for review and approval by the Planning Office and shall contain, but not be limited to, provisions for assessment, maintenance, repair and upkeep of common open space areas, public parkland/open space corridors, stormwater facilities, public trails, snow removal, and other areas common to the association pursuant to Chapter 18.72 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. • These documents shall include a common area and facility maintenance plan and guarantee for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, and stormwater facilities in accordance with Chapter 18.72 or the Bozeman Municipal Code. • These documents shall be submitted to the city attorney and shall not be accepted by the city until approved as to legal form and effect. A draft of these documents must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department at least 45 working days prior to filing and recordation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. • These documents shall be executed and submitted with the final plat to be filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder at the time of final plat recordation. d. The Final Plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The Final Plat application shall include four (4) signed reproducible copies on a 3 mil or heavier stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 3-1/2" floppy disk; and five (5) paper prints. Page 11 e. Pursuant to §18.06.040.D.6 of the BMC, conditional approval of the Preliminary Plat shall be in force for not more than one calendar year for minor subdivisions, two years for single-phased major subdivisions and three years for multi-phased major subdivisions. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. The City Commission may, at the written request of the developer, extend its.approval for no more than one calendar year, except that the City Commission may extend its approval for a period of more than one year if that approval period is included as a specific condition of a written subdivision improvements agreement between the City Commission and the developer, provided for in §18.74.060 of the BMC. f. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to installation, certification, and acceptance of all required improvements by the City of Bozeman, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the Preliminary Plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the Final Plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Once the Findings of Fact and Order have been approved and signed, the original and a copy will be forwarded to you for your files. If you have any further concerns or questions, please feel free to contact me at 58675266 or the Planning Department, 582-2260. Sincerely, Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer, P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 - Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-3001 Page 12 Yahoo! Mail -lwinde@yahoo.com Pagel of 3 MAIL Print-Close Window Date: Thu,0'Dec 2005 13:41:12 -a500 To: BozemanMT_Agendas@mm.windigicert.com CC: From: boze.manmt_agendas@mm.wir:digicert.com Subject: [Bozem=_n:mt_agendas] City Commission Agenda 12/11/2006 THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF BOZEMAN,MONTANA AGENDA Monday, December 11, 2006 A. Call to Order - 6:60 PM -Community Room, Gallatin County Courthouse,311 West Main B. Pledge of Allegiance and Moment of Silence C. Public Service Announcement- City Garbage Collection Holiday Schedule D. Minutes -November 20, December 4, 2006 *Consider a motion to approve the :minutes of November 20 and December 4, 2006 as submitted. E. Consent 1. Claims (LaMeres) 2. Approve Publ:c Access Drainage Easement for Sandpiper Condos (Hesston) ;. Approve rejection of bids and re-advertisement of Milwaukee Rail Trail and Library Site Improvements (Folger) 4. Ratify grant o Special Permit to sell Beer or Wine (Neibauer) *Consider a motion to approve Consent items 1 —4 as listed. F. Public Comment-Please state name and address in an audible tone of voice for the record. This is the time for individuals to comment on matters falling within the purview of the Bozeman City Commission. There will also be an opportunity in conjunction with each agenda item for comments pertaining to that item. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. G. Mayoral Proclamation—Proclaim December Drunk and Drugged Driving (D3) Prevention Month H. Action Items 1. Parking Commission Appointments (Bernard) *Mayor to consider appointing one .member to the Parking Commission. AND http://us.f528.mail.yahoo,com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Inbox&Msgld=2024-12564206-7342... 12/7/2006 Yahoo! Mail - lwinde@yahoo.com Page 2 of 3 *Consider a motion to ratify Mayoral appointment to the Parking Commission 2. Historic Preservation Advisory Board Appointments (Bernard) *Consider a motion to appoint up to two at-large members to the Historic Preservation Advisory Board. 3. City-County Board of Health Appointments (Bernard) *Consider a motion to appoint one member to the City-County Board of Health. 4. PL Land Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan, Z-06230 (Windemaker) *Cc nsider a motion to approve application PL Land Planned Unit Development Preliminary Pi an, #Z- 0 230 with relaxations #1, #3, #7, #9, #11, #12, with the conditions of approval in the staff report. (Phis motion effectively denies#2, #4, #S, #6, #8, and#10) 5. PT Land Subdivision Preliminary Plat, P-06057 (Windemaker) *Consider a motion to approve application PT Land Subdivision Preliminary Plat; #P-06057, wi the conditions of approval listed in the staff report and amended in the Commission memo. 6. Hand 2nd Single-Household Residence, Site Plan and Certificate of Appropriateness application with one deviation, #Z-06261 (Bristor) *Connsider a motion to approve the Hand 2nd Single-Household Residence Site Plan and Certtlic.ate of .4ppropriateness application with deviations (#Z-06261) as conditioned by Planning Staff 7. Future Location of the Ten Commandments Monument(Kukulski) EITHER *Consider a motion to authorize the City Manager to re-install the gifted Ten Commandments monument into Soroptimist Park. OR *Consider a motion to authorize the City Manager to work with the Eagles and St. James Episcopal Church for their consideration in displaying the monument in CarterburyPark. i. Non-Action Items i. Story Mill Center Informal, I-06030 (Saunders) *Ccnsider the informal application and offer comment and directio,. ,T. FYI/Discussion i. Discussion of Big Box Fund(Rosenberry) 2. 2007-08 Goal/Work Plan Discussion(Kukulski) http:°/us.f528.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=lnbox&MsgId=2024_12564206_7342... l'_''i7/20,_- i ` J J ! ' III � 's'. ��� �' i�� I�� �� {�� �. ��� � '�i. 4 r 1 . q, {i III I 1 i'�i 'i' li tIl I�' I ��� 4 iti� � '�i ���` , �4,k �� ��� } Yahoo! _Mail - lwinde@},ahoom Page 3 of 3 3. Story Mill Center Request(Oulman) K. Adjournment City Commission meetings are cpen to all members of the public. If you have a disab'lit}That requires assistance,Tease contact our ADA Coordinator, Ron Brey, at 582 2306(TDD 5K 2301). Please note that agenda submissions.must be received by the City Manager the Wednesday before tae Commission Meeting. For further infi6rrration please see the City of Bozeman webpage at wiviv.bozeMc .net Commission meetings are tel_vised live on cable channel twenty. Repeats are aired at 5 PM on Wednesday and Friday and I PM on Plain Text Attachment You are subscribed t:o tEze Psblic Agendas mailing list. To unsubscribe from this .list: http://'bozemanmt.virtualtownha_l.net/subscriber.shtml http://us.f5 '8.mail.yahoo.com/ym/SbowLetter?box=Inbox&MsgId=2024_1256420E_73Z-2... 12r7/2006 V h w. Commission Memorandum N Co.tl� REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Lanette Windemaker, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT: PT Land PUD Preliminary Plan, #P-06230 MEETING DATE: Monday, December 11, 2006 BACKGROUND: An application to develop — 47 acres into 18 lots for commercial use, roads, open space areas and site related improvements on property legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F, and situated in the SW '/4 of Section 1, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The applicant has requested the following PUD relaxations: 1) §18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane. Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat conditions. 2) §18.44.080.A General, to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lan-,. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 3) §18.44 060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard.Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat conditions. 4) §18.44,060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the west side. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 5) §18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access, to not construct a planned collector street (North 15th Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 6) §18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets, to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end near the west property line. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat Condition #25 as amended in the Plat memo. 7) §18.42.040.13. Block Length, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control. Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 8) §18.42.040.B. Block Length, to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See Plan Condition #7. 9) §18.42.040.C. Block Width, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. Staff recommends approval of this relaxat-,on. 10)§18.42-040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians, to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See Plan Condition #8 and Plat Condition #2. 11)§18.42.--00.13.6.a. Watercourse Setback, to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1. Staff would not generally support this relaxation but due to the specific circumstances of this project, recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition 94 as amended by Planning Board. 0 • 12)§18.42.100.13.3.c. Watercourse Setback, to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. Staff does not support this relaxation, but does recognize that there might be road design issues due to the current location of the North 15th Avenue right-of-way, and therefore recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition #1. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: Relaxations — Staff has recommended denial of the following relaxations: 2. §18.44.080.A General, to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane.Since there is a sidewalk on Baxter Lane to the west, staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 4. §18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the west side. Since there is a sidewalk on North 15"'Avenue to the south,staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 5. §18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access, to not construct a planned collector street (North 15th Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. North 15th Avenue is a planned collector street shown on Figure 11-7 of the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan adopted by reference to the Bozeman 2020 Plan. Therefore, this request in not in accordance with the adopted growth policy and Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 6. §18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets, to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end near the west property line. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat Condition #25 as amended in the Plat memo. The applicant requested relaxation #6 to allow flexibility in the timing of the construction of the Tschache Lane crossing of the Walton Stream/Ditch to work with the adjoining property owner. The adjoining property is currently undergoing subdivision review and since it is not being phased it may actually be moving ahead of this subdivision. 3. §18.42.040.B. Block Length, to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length. Since there are no physical constraints, staff recommends denial of this relaxation:See the following condition: Plan #7; "The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians". 10. §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians, to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet. Since there are no physical constraints, staff recommends denial of this relaxation: See the following conditions: Plan #8; "The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights- Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat". And Plat #2; "A right of way, not less than 10 feet wide, for a city standard sidewalk, is required mid-block in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights- Of-Way for Pedestrians". RECOMMENDATION: The City Commission approves application #P-06230 with relaxations #1, #3, #7, #9, #11, #12, with the conditions of approval in the staff report, and denies relaxations #2, #4, #5,#6, #8, and#10. 2 it I ' i� • �� i '� � y ^ 4 1 • J , 4 f t it C '�� �; . ��, �� ;r i� �; �� 1 I I !� � 1 FISCAL EFFECTS: Fiscal impacts are undetermined at this time, but will include increased property tax revenues from new development, along with increased costs to deliver municipal services to the property. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. CONTACT: Please email Lanette Windemaker at lwindemake_Qbozeman.net if you have any questions prior to the public hearing. APPROVED BY: Andrew Epple, Planning Director Chris Kukulski, City Manager 3 4 t CITY COMMISSION STAFF°REPORT 4_'Z-06230 PT LAND CUP PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN WITH RELAXATIONS Item: Zoning Application #Z-06230, for a Conditional Use Permit for the PT Land Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan with relaxations to allow commercial development. The property, generally bounded by Baxter Lane, North 11'h Avenue, West Oak Street, and North 15th Avenue, is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F,located in Section 1, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property is zoned B-2 (Community Business District). Owner/Applicant: PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-5757. Representative: Morrison-Maierle, Inc.,3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808. Date/Time: Before the City Commission on Monday, December 11, 2006, at 6:00 p.m., in the Community Room, Gallatin County Courthouse,311 West Main Street,Bozeman,Montana Report By: Lanette Windemaker,AICP; Contract Planner Recommendation: Conditional Approval PROJECT LOCATION The property is generally bounded by Baxter Lane,North 11`h Avenue,West Oak Street,and North 151h Avenue. The—47 acre property is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F,located in Section 1, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property zoned B-2 (Community Business District) and falls within the Oak Street and the 1-90 Entryway Overlay Districts. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. r Subject Pro ert p. Y B-2 z , : i ; .W Oak-St R=O R-4 PROPOSAL Application has been made the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan with relaxations on — 47 acres to be developed as a commercial development.This proposal would allow 18 commercial and open space lots.American Federal Savings Bank is the initial phase of the PUD. The Design Review Board reviewed the Preapplication Plan at its March 22,2006,public meeting. The intent of Section 18.36 "Planned Unit Development" is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. The applicant is proposing relaxations from the city's standards through the Planned Unit Development process and therefore must demonstrate a plan that will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced under the existing standards. The applicant has requested the following relaxations: 1) §18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane. Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat conditions. 2) §18.44.080.A General,to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 3) §18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards,to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard.Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat conditions. 4) §18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards,to build North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the west side.-Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 5) §18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access, to not construct a planned collector street (North 15th Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 2 private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 6) §18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets, to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end near the west property line. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat Condition #25 as amended in the Plat memo. 7) §18.42.040.B.Block Length,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands,and access control.Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 8) §18.42.040.B.Block Length,to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length.Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See Plan Condition #7. 9) §18.42.040.C. Block Width,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 10)§18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians, to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See Plan Condition #8 and Plat Condition #2. 11)§18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback,to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1. Staff would not generally support this relaxation but due to the specific circumstances of this project, recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition #4 as amended by Planning Board 12)§18.42.100.B.3.c. Watercourse Setback, to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane.Staff does not support this relaxation, but does recognize that there might be road design issues due to the current location of the North 15th Avenue right-of-way, and therefore recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition #1. Note that this proposal is also undergoing concurrent review for a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat to allow 18 lots for commercial and open space use.The subdivision and related relaxations will be evaluated by the DRC, the Planning Board, and the City Commission. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The subject property is zoned B-2(Community Business District).The intent of the B-2(Community Business District)is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets. The following land uses and zoning are adjacent to the subject property: North: B-2 (Community Business District)—I-90. East: B-2 (Community Business District).)—Oak Street Place PUD and Kenyon Noble PUD. South: R-0 (Residential Office District)—office buildings. West: B-2 (Community Business District)—Bridger Peaks Village PUD and Lowes PUD. ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The property is currently designated as"Regional Commercial and Services"in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. This classification provides areas for retail, education, health services, public administration and tourism for a multi-county region. Often the scale of these services is larger than #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 3 would be required for just Bozeman.Because of the draw from outside consumers of these services, it is necessary that these types of facilities be located in proximity to significant transportation routes. Since these are large and prominent facilities within the community and region,it is appropriate that design guidelines be established to ensure compatibility with the remainder of the community. REVIEW CRITERIA & FINDINGS The City of Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan with relaxations against the criteria set forth in Section 18.34.090, Section 18.34.100 and Chapter 18.36 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The findings outlined in this report include comments and recommended conditions provided by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board(DRB). Section 18.34.090 "Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria" In considering applications for site plan approval under this title, the Planning Director, City Commission, DRC, and when appropriate, the ADR Staff,the DRB,the BABAB, the CAFIAB or WRB shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy. With the exception of the request to not construct a planned collector street(North 15 h Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and io allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane, the"development proposal is generally in conformance with the"Regional Commercial and Services"land use designation in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. Specific goals related to the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan include the following: • Goal 4.9.1 Community Design—Create a community composed of neighborhoods designed for human scale and compatibility in which services and amenities are convenient, visually pleasing, and properly integrated and designed to encourage walking, cycling, and mass transit use. Objective 3. Continue the entryway overlay design review programs to ensure aesthetically pleasing development on major entrances into the community. Objective 5.Achieve an environment through urban design'that creates,maintains,and enhances the City's industrial, commercial, and institutional areas. Objective 7.Achieve an environment through urban design.that maintains and enhances the City's visual qualities within neighborhood, community, and regional commercial areas. • Goal 6.6.1, Objective 5. All development activity shall comply with the right-of-way standards, road locations, and other policies set forth in the Transportation Facility Plan to #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 4 ensure that an orderly, efficient, effective transportation system is continued and to avoid future problems with inadequate transportation services and options. • Goal 7.6.1 Promote and encourage the continued development of Bozeman as a vital economic center. Objective 3. Foster a positive economic climate through a well managed and aesthetically pleasing built environment and by maintaining a beautiful and healthy natural environment to promote and attract businesses with a desirable impact on the community. • Goal 10.8.1 Transportation System—Maintain and enhance the functionality of the transportation system. Objective 3. All development activity shall comply with the right-of-way standards,road locations, and other policies set forth in the transportation facility plan to ensure that an orderly, efficient, effective transportation system is continued and to avoid future problems with inadequate transportation services and options. 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations. The final plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced- in the Unified Development Ordinance. PT Land PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by.a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.0901, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space,exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot,and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 5 • ' d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape.Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19'h Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor,shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval,a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. American Federal Bank Site Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.18.050,parking areas shall have a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet from North 15`" Avenue. b. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19t'Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, street trees characterized by a formal arrangement of large canopy boulevard trees shall be located in the street right-of-way boulevards subject to the following requirements: (1) One large canopy boulevard tree, a minimum of eight(8) feet in height or 1" caliper and planted at regular intervals of fifty (50) feet on center. (2) Acceptable large canopy boulevard trees include the following species: Ash, Patmore Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica); Honeylocust, Seedless (Gleditsia triacanthos); Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra); and Maple,Norway (Acer Platanoides). c. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19t'Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor,the Greenway corridors located in the 50-foot setback will be characterized by informal vegetative planting of trees, shrubs, berms and groundcover for #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 6 every one hundred (100) feet of frontage along the entryway corridors as listed below. (1) A total of four (4) evergreen and deciduous trees at random or in cluster arrangements, with no more than fifty (50%) percent being deciduous, a minimum of 8-10 feet in height, or 1-1/2"caliper; (2) A total of two (2) small ornamental trees at random locations, a minimum of 8 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (3) A total of six (6) deciduous and/or coniferous large shrubs, of which three (3) shall be flowering shrubs, at random locations and a minimum of 8-1/2 feet in height at maturity, 2-3 feet installation size; Or earth berms, an average of 3.5 feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within 3 years. d. Per 18.42.150, additional information on the site lighting (cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. e. Per 18.42.170, the design and location of the trash enclosure is subject to review and approval by the City Sanitation Department, and must be shown on the final site plan. f. Per 18.44.100, sight vision triangles must be correctly depicted on the final site plan. g. Per 18.46.040.C.2, ADR staff approves a 5% reduction in the number of required parking spaces from 42 to 40 in exchange for the provision of 700 square feet of landscaping in addition to the required amount of landscaping. These improvements must be placed in the public right-of-way or yards directly facing the right-of-way. h. Per 18.48.0503 and 060.B.3, screening is required for residential adjacency along the west side in accordance with the landscaping standards. i. Per 18.52.060,a comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two or more tenant spaces on a lot and shall be designed in accordance with §18.52.070, BMC. j. Per 18.52.060, the total permitted signage shall not exceed 400 square feet, and one freestanding sign is permitted. The location of the freestanding sign shall be shown on the Final Site Plan and landscape plan. Signage is subject to ADR review and approval, and a sign permit. k. Per 18.34.140, seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six (6) months of the date of preliminary approval. 1. Per 18.64.100, a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one(1)year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, providing that such activity does not include excavation for foundations or the removal of mature, healthy vegetation, #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 7 and NO CONCRETE 'MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. in. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Site Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary site plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Staff has found the application in general compliance with all other applicable law,ordinances, and regulations,and the applicant is required to provide copies of all applicable permits prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property. With the conditions outlined by the DRC and the DRB,the elements of the PT Land PUD plan including the land use patterns, circulation, and open space are arranged in an appropriate manner for a commercial development and would be compatible with the conditions both on and off the property. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions. The project's impact on the existing and anticipated traffic is addressed by implementing all of the recommendations made in the Traffic Impact Study for the PT Land Property by Belin Traffic Services,dated May 2006. This is reflected in conditions of approval for the preliminary plat as required by the City Engineer,which included improvements to adjacent streets and appropriate intersections. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress, egress and circulation. Pedestrian circulation is provided throughout the project with sidewalks and a trail. With the exception of the sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane, staff does not support applicant's requests for relaxations from requirements for pedestrian and street connections. The PUD plan includes interior subdivision streets with access off of Baxter Lane,North 11'h Avenue,North 151h Avenue and Oak Street. All lots are provided with vehicular access either from local streets and/or shared access points. 7. Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings, the appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation. Per Section 18.48.020, planned unit development landscaping plans shall meet or exceed the standards of these landscaping regulations. 8. Open space. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 8 corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. 9. Building location and height. Maximum building height for each residential district shall be as follows: Residential Building Height Table Maximum Building Height in Feet Roof Pitch in Feet B-2 Less than 3:12 38 3:12 or greater 44 Maximum height allowed by above may be increased by up to a maximum of 50 percent when the B-2 zoning district is implementing a Regional Commercial and Services growth policy land use designation. Maximum height otherwise cumulatively allowed by this section may be increased by 30 percent through the approval of a conditional use permit,but only when the additional height is a specifically identified purpose of the review. 10. Setbacks. Minimum yards required for the B-2 district is: 1. Buildings: Front yard—7 feet, except along arterials where minimum is 25 feet Rear yard— 10 feet Side yards— 5 feet (except zero lot lines as allowed by §18.38.060, BMC) 2. Parking and loading areas: Front yard—25 feet Rear yard— 10 feet Side yards— 8 feet 11. Lighting. The project will need to provide lighting in accordance with Section 18.42.150. Prior to final plan and plat approval, staff will review lighting plans for conformance with the code. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities. The project will need to provide utilities in accordance with the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The design reports for utilities have been submitted to the Engineering Department for review. 13. Site surface drainage and storm water control. Storm water detention areas have been shown of the plan. The design report for storm water control has been submitted to the Engineering Department for review. 14. Loading and unloading areas. Loading areas will be reviewed at the time of applicable site plans. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 9 • r 15. Grading. Plans and specifications for utilities,roads and storm water control will have to address grading and be submitted to the Engineering Department for review. 16. Signage. All signage will need to comply with Chapter 52. 17. Screening. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1,2,and.3,Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 18. Overlay district provisions. DESIGN OBJECTIVES PLAN CRITERIA 1. Neighborhood Design (pages 9-14 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Green Space-The existing watercourses,setbacks and wetlands are being preserved as green spaces.The stormwater detention facilities are located within the green space.The Oak Street setback will be landscaped to Design Objectives Plan standards. B. Auto Connections-Shared accesses are required on North 11 t"and North 15th Avenues. C. Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections-Sidewalks will connect to regional trails.The key pedestrian system along Oak Street will be continued. Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1, 4, and 5) have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 151n Avenue north of Patrick.In addition,a relaxation(10)have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. D. Street Character-The Oak Street setback has a coordinated landscaping design to help create a shared identity. 2. Site Design (pages 15-36 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Natural Features - The existing watercourses, setbacks and wetlands are being preserved as green spaces. B. .Views - This building should not significantly obstruct views. C. Cultural Resources—There are no known cultural resources. D. Topography—Site work is planned to protect topographic assets. E. Site Drainage—Storm drains are piped,with the stormwater detention facilities located in the green space. F. Building Placement — The buildings in this PUD are not clustered. The American Federal Savings Bank has been designed for maximum solar advantage and has a skylight incorporated. G. Outdoor Public Spaces — American Federal Savings Bank has designed an outdoor public space in front of the main entrance. H. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems—Sidewalks will connect to regional trails. The key pedestrian system along Oak Street will be continued. Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1, 4, and 5) have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 10 151h Avenue north of Patrick. In addition, a relaxation (10) have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. I. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems-Shared accesses are required on North 1 I`h and North 15`h Avenues. J. Parking Lots — The parking for American Federal Savings Bank will be minimized through the use of landscaping in lieu of parking. K. Site Lighting—Lighting will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. L. Utilities and Service Areas—Service areas are oriented away from the major streets and integrated into the building design. M. Landscape Design—Drought tolerant materials are proposed. N. Buffers—Landscaped buffers are provided and must be enhanced to buffer incompatible uses. 3. Building Design (pages 37-48 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Building & Topography -The building follows the general lay of the land. B. Building Character-The building reflects the regional urban character. C. Primary Building Entrance - The primary building entrance faces west towards a pedestrian plaza and the parking area. D. Street Level Interest - Materials and details must be used as shown on the elevation study of the buildings to provide street level interest. E. Building Mass& Scale-The American Federal Savings Bank is approximately 21,000 square feet in total floor area with 14,718 on the main floor and 5,166 on the second floor, 37 feet in height for the overall mass with the second floor stepped back about 14 feet. F. Roof Form- The primary roof form is sloped with both hip and exposed gable ends. There are overhanging eaves and multiple roof planes. G. Building Materials- The plans depict brick veneer, cultured stone veneer, metallic insets,heavy timber accents,and asphalt or standing seam metal roof. Staff recommends use of the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the color renderings. H. Building Complex - This PUD is divided into 4 areas which planned to use different rooflines and similar materials. I. Service Canopies-Not applicable. The policy is specific to gas station canopy design. J. Color-The guidelines recommend natural tones to blend in and reduce perceived scale. The primary building elements are in stone,wood,and earth tones with bolder colors in the signage. K. Utilities & Mechanical Equipment- The Bozeman Municipal Code and the Design Objectives Plan require all mechanical equipment to be screened from view. The elevations do not depict any roof top mounted mechanical equipment. The Final Site Plan for each building shall identify the location of all mechanical equipment and identify the method of screening. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 11 4. Sign Design (pages 49-56 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Sign Context & Position — A comprehensive sign plan is required for the American Federal Savings Bank property. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. B. Sign Type—One freestanding sign is permitted per lot. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code C. Sign Materials—White backgrounds are not appropriate.All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. D. Sign Lighting — Internal illumination is discouraged. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. E. Sign Content-All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. F. Wall Murals -Not applicable. 5. Corridor Specific Guidelines: North 19`h Avenue & Oak Street Corridor (pages 69-79 of the Design Objectives Plan) 1. Existing agricultural site features and/or resources should be integrated into a newer development when feasible -Not applicable. 2. Create a"green edge"along the front of the property-PT Land is responsible for the installation of landscaping within the 50 foot setback. The landscape plan will need to be revised to meet the minimum landscaping requirements for the North 19tn Avenue and Oak Street corridors. 3. Minimize the impact of parking lots - A landscaped setback is provided to minimize the visual impact of the parking lot. 4. A detached pedestrian and bike boulevard trail shall be provided in the setback -PT Land is responsible for the installation of the path along Oak Street. 5. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and between projects — Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1,4, and 5)have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 15'h Avenue north of Patrick. In addition,a relaxation(10)have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. 6. Building Materials - The corridor specific guidelines suggest that wood and masonry are the preferred exterior wall finishes. The primary material proposed is brick veneer,cultured stone veneer,metallic insets,heavy timber accents,and asphalt or standing seam metal roof. Staff recommends requiring the use of the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands)as shown on the elevation study rather than the color renderings. 7. Streetscape Elements - Streetscape elements will be provided with the installation of improvements for this PUD, site plan and subdivision. 8. Sign Type-Freestanding signs are proposed.A comprehensive sign plan is required for the American Federal Savings Plan property. 9. Sign Design Attributes - The signs will provide accent color and interest. Interstate 90 (pages 100-102 of the Design Objectives Plan): 1. The highway edge should be primarily"natural"in character with native trees #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 12 and related plantings at interchanges - This property does not directly abut the highway however, the 50 foot landscaped setback from the road right-of-way will ensure a green area. 2. Provide site and building improvements to the side of the buildings that face the Interstate- Site plans will be review in accordance with Design Objectives Plan. 3. Reduce the visual impact of industrial operations - Site plans will be review in accordance with Design Objectives Plan. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties. Not applicable. 20. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirements of this title,whether the lots are either: a.Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Not applicable. Section 18.34.100"City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits" In addition to the review criteria outlined above, the City Commission shall, in approving a conditional use permit, find favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. This Planned Unit Development application for a commercial development includes a request for numerous relaxations from the Bozeman Municipal Code.Other than the relaxations noted above and the conditions recommended for approval, the site is generally adequate in size and topography to accommodate the potential uses and related site improvements. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. This project is in a commercially zoned area and is bordered on two sides by major roads. Therefore, it will generally have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing regulation of use. b. Special yards, and buffers. Planning Staff has recommended landscaping in lieu of parking for the American Federal Savings Bank. See American Federal Savings Bank #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 13 j condition #7: The front yard setback from North 15`h Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. c. Special fences, solid fences and walls. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions regarding fencing. d. Surfacing of parkin areas.reas. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing surfacing of parking areas. e. Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds. All public streets will be dedicated and improved. f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress. Planning Staff has recommended additional conditions addressing accesses as appropriate when adjacent to arterial or collector streets. g. Regulation of signs. Planning Staff has recommended the following conditions addressing signage. PUD Condition#2:The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green),Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red) and Support Services Neighborhood(yellow)areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. American Federal Bank Site Plan Condition #l: The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the.transitioning of uses and the residential adjacency. h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing maintenance. i. Regulation of noise, vibrations and odors. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing noise, vibrations and odors. j. Regulation of hours for certain activities. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing regulation of hours for certain activities. k. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed The applicant must submit the Final Site Plan within 1 year of City Commission approval, and must undertake development of the project within 2 years of final site plan approval. 1. Duration of use. Conditional use permits run with the land, subject to application and adherence to all special conditions of approval. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing duration of use. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 14 m. Requiring the dedication of access rights. It is a code provision that all rights of way be dedicated. n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner. Any additional conditions stated in this approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Chanter 18.36 "Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria" In addition to the review criteria outlined for site plan and conditional use permit review,the City Commission shall, in approving a planned unit development, find favorably as follows: All Development (1) Does the development comply with all City design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Other than the requested relaxations described above,the applicant has not requested a deviation, waiver or relaxation from any of the above listed services, and the development generally complies with city design standards. (2) Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? There is no significant natural vegetation in the project. The proposed development will mitigate the noxious weed problem on this property and replace natural vegetation. (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? The elements of the site plan are designed to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.)contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The availability of internal pedestrian circulation created by sidewalks,pathways, and the trail system,and the general proximity to the commercial areas contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project. (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? There are no residential areas within the PUD. However,the residential areas to the west of this project will be screened by landscaping generally designed to provide a level of privacy. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 15 (6)Park Land.Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration,and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by §18.50.020, BMC? The design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contributed to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration. Park land is not required for a non-residential development. (7) Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape.The code requires the applicant to demonstrate the achievement of the performance points.The open space shall be landscaped by the applicant in a manner that shall meet or exceed the standards of Chapter 18.48. (8)Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The design of the PUD provides integrated circulation patterns with connections to adjacent streets. The sidewalk system around and within the PUD will provide open access for all neighborhoods to enjoy the business and open space areas. Commercial (1)If the project contains any use intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment,does it meet the requirements for adult businesses? Not applicable. (2)Is the project contiguous to an arterial street,and has adequate but controlled access been provided? The project is adjacent Oak Street - a major arterial. Montana Department of Transportation regulates the access on Oak Street. All accesses maintain the required access separation distances. (3) Is the project on at least two acres of land? The subject property is —47 gross acres. (4)If the project contains two or more significant uses(for instance,retail,office, residential, hotel/motel and recreation), do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation,architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, etc.? This project provides integration of uses through pedestrian and vehicular circulation, and utilization of common open space. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 16 V • • (5) Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? The Bozeman 2020 plan has designated this area as a "Regional Commercial" land use designation. This project promotes mixed use adjacent to significant transportation route intent of this classification. (6)Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? This will be addressed at individual site plan review. (7) Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? This project demonstrates compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman 2020 Plan by advancing the intent of"Regional Commercial"land use designation for the large scale mixed use adjacent to significant transportation routes. (8) Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas (such as additional landscaped areas,open spaces,trails or picnic areas)for the use and enjoyment of those living in,working in or visiting the development? This project contains sidewalks,a trail and open space areas for the use and enjoyment of those living around, working in or visiting the development. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comments have been received as of this date.Any public comments received after the date of this report will be distributed at the public hearing. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Staff,the Bozeman Development Review Committee(DRC),Design Review Board(DRB) and other boards, when appropriate, have reviewed the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan with relaxations against the criteria set forth in Section 18.34.090, Section 18.34.100 and Chapter 18.36 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Based on the evaluation of said criteria and findings by the Planning Staff, staff finds that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The following conditions of approval are recommended: PT Land PUD Plan Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green),Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red)and Support Services #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 17 Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5,Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor,and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the I-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots,Lots 2 and 3,Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with §18.78.100 and§18.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1,Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians.The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to-the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development,all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to 518.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to 518.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 18 f 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not, in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of §18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. American Federal Bank Site Plan Conditions: 1. The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses and the residential adjacency. 2. The building shall be built with the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the simplified color renderings. 3. A material board/color palette for the building,including material samples and color chips,shall be subject to review and approval by the ADR and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. The northern drive access shall be designed and designated as shared access to North 15`" Avenue (or whichevever street is the collector) with the adjoining property to the north. 5. A city standard sidewalk shall be installed along the northern drive lane from North 150'Avenue to North 14`" Avenue to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 6. The parking lot and building shall not encroach into the 50 foot landscaped setback along Oak Street. 7. The front yard setback from North 15t" Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. 8. Trees shall not be located within 10 feet of sewer,water,and piped stormwater services. Sewer, water,and piped stormwater services shall be shown on the landscaping plans and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. 9. Fire hydrants shall not be located within 10 feet of trees and light fixtures.Fire hydrants shall be shown on landscaping and lighting plans. 10. The final site plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other 4Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 19 relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 11. The elevations of American Federal Savings Bank shall be reviewed by the DRB,in accordance with the recommended changes from the informal DRB review on October 25, 2006, before Final Site Plan approval. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff,the Bozeman Development Review Committee(DRC),Design Review Board(DRB) and other boards,when appropriate,have reviewed the application#Z-06230 for a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for the PT Land Planned Unit Development(PUD)Preliminary Plan with relaxations to allow development of—47 acres and as a result recommends to the City Commission approval of said application with relaxations#1,#3,#7,#9,#11,#12,with the conditions of approval in the staff report and amended in this memo, and denial of relaxations#2, #4, #5, #6, #8, and#10. The Planning Staff has identified various code provisions that are not currently met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings and conditions of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A CUP FOR THE PT LAND PUD WITH RELAXATIONS. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.66 OF THE BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION. Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer, P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-3001 Ray Johnson, CWG Architects, 650 Power St., Helena, MT 59601 #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 20 ' CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT #Z-06230 t PT LAND CUP PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN WITH RELAXATIONS I � Item: Zoning Application #Z-06230, for a Conditional Use Permit for the PT Land Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan with relaxations to allow commercial development. The property, generally bounded by Baxter Lane, North lIth Avenue, West Oak Street, and North 15th Avenue, is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F,located in Section 1, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property is zoned B-2 (Community Business District). Owner/Applicant: PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-5757. Representative: Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808. Date/Time: Before the City Commission on Monday, December 11, 2006, at 6:00 p.m., in the Community Room, Gallatin County Courthouse,311 West Main Street,Bozeman,Montana Report By: Lanette Windemaker,AICP; Contract Planner Recommendation: Conditional Approval PROJECT LOCATION The property is generally bounded by Baxter Lane,North 1 I1h Avenue, West Oak Street,and North 15"'Avenue.The—47 acre property is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F,located in Section 1, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property zoned B-2 (Community Business District) and falls within the Oak Street and the I-90 Entryway Overlay Districts. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. I I Subject - --� eak e� Property 1 i ._ Z I I to �.............w i.S IWO �•— W.Oak-St N. R=O R-4 PROPOSAL Application has been made the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminar}, Plan with relaxations on — 47 acres to be developed as a commercial development.This proposal would allow 18 commercial and open space lots.American Federal Savings Bank is the initial phase of the PUD. The Design Review Board reviewed the Preapplication Plan at its March 22,2006,public meeting. The intent of Section 18.36 "Planned Unit Development" is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of[arid and the design of development projects within the city. The applicant is proposing relaxations from the city's standards through the Planned Unit Development process and therefore must demonstrate a plan that will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced under the existing standards. The applicant has requested the following relaxations: 1) §18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane. Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat conditions. 2) §18.44.080.A General,to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 3.) §18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards,to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard.Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat conditions. 4) §18.44.060 Str-:.et Improvement S=andards,to build North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the west side. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 5) §18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access, to not construct a planned collector street(North 15th Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 2 private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 61 §18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets, to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end near the west property line. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation subject to Engineering Plat Condition #25 as amended in the Plat memo. 7) §18.42.040.B.Block Length,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands,and access control.Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 8) §18.42.040.B.Block Length,to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length.Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See Plan Condition #7. 9) §18.42.040.C.Block Width,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation.Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 10)§18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians, to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See Plan Condition #8 and Plat Condition #2. 11)§18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback,to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1. Staff would not generally support this relaxation but due to the specific circumstances of this project, recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition #4 as amended by Planning Board. 12) §18.42.100.B.3.c. Watercourse Setback, to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane.Staff does not support this relaxation, but does recognize that there might be road design issues due to the current location of the North 15th Avenue right-of-way, and therefore recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition #1. Note that this proposal is also undergoing concurrent review for a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat to allow 18 lots for commercial and open space use.The subdivision and related relaxations will be evaluated by the DRC, the Planning Board, and the City Commission. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The subject property is zoned B-2(Community Business District).The intent of the B-2(Community Business District)is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets. The following land uses and zoning are adjacent to the subject property: North: B-2 (Community Business District)—I-90. East: B-2 (Community Business District).)—Oak Street Place PUD and Kenyon Noble PUD. South: R-0 (Residential Office District)—office buildings. ',Vest: B-2 (Community Business District)—Bridger Peaks Village PUD and Lowes PUD. ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The property is currently designated as"Regional Commercial and Services"in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. This classification provides areas for retail, education, health services, public administration and tourism for a multi-county region.Often the scale of these services is larger than 4Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 3 would be required for just Bozeman.Because of the draw from outside consumers of these services, it is necessary that these types of facilities be located in proximity to significant transportation routes. Since these are large and prominent facilities within the community and region,it is appropriate that design guidelines be established to ensure compatibility with the remainder of the community. REVIEW CRITERIA & FINDINGS The City of Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit(CUP) for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan with relaxations against the criteria set forth in Section 18.34.090, Section 18.34.100 and Chapter 18.36 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The findings outlined in this report include comments and recommended conditions provided by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and Design Review Board (DRB). Section 18.34.090 "Site Plan and Master Site Plan Review Criteria" In considering applications for site plan approval under this title, the Planning Director, City Commission, DRC, and when appropriate, the ADR Staff, the DRB, the BABAB,the CAHAB or WRB shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City's adopted growth policy. With the exception of the request to not construct a planned collector street(North 15'h Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane, the development proposal is generally in conformance with the"Regional Commercial and Services"land use designation in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. Specific goals related to the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan include the following: • Goal 4.9.1 Community. Design—Create a community composed of neighborhoods designed for human scale and compatibility in which services and amenities are convenient, visually pleasing, and properly integrated and designed to encourage walking, cycling, and mass transit use. Objective 3. Continue the entryway overlay design review programs to ensure aesthetically pleasing development on major entrances into the community. Objective 5. Achieve an environment through urban design that creates,maintains,and enhances the City's industrial, commercial, and institutional areas. Objective 7.Achieve an environment through urban design that maintains and enhances the City's visual qualities within neighborhood, community, and regional commercial areas. • Goal 6.6.1, Objective 5. All development activity shall comply with the right-of-way standards, road locations, and other policies set forth in the Transportation Facility Plan to #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 4 ensure that an orderly, efficient, effective transportation system is continued znd to avoid future problems with inadequate transportation services and options. • Goal 7.6.1 Promote and encourage the continued development of Bozeman as.a vital economic center. Objective-3. Foster a positive economic climate through a well managed and aesthetically pleasing built environment and by maintaining a beautiful .and healthy natural environment to promote and attract businesses with a desirable impact on the community. r • Goal 10.8.1 Transportation System—Maintain and enhance the functionality of the transportation system. Objective 3.All development activity shall comply with the right-.of--way standards,road locations, and other policies set forth in the transportation facility plan to ensure that an orderly, efficient, effective transportation system is continues and to avoid future problems with inadequate transportation services and options. 2. Conformance to this title, including the cessation of any current violations. The final plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. PT Land PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 71h Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by.a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.0901, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space,exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior lands-cape.Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot,and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 5 J'I� • f { ' 4 d{I f �� `{( � 1 i f�ff 1Ftt r t t +�4t , 7 1 h I t , • i ti 1 �: �, {� '. � � . a r i I ��. � � 9 �, l �,. _ �� d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay,which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19'h Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor,shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office.. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval,a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. American Federal Bank Site Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.18.050,parking areas shall have a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet from North 15`h Avenue. b. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19`h Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, street trees characterized by a formal arrangement of large canopy boulevard trees shall be located in the street right-of-way boulevards subject to the following requirements: (1) One large canopy boulevard tree, a minimum of eight(8) feet in height or 1"caliper and planted at regular intervals of fifty(50) feet on center. (2)Acceptable large canopy boulevard trees include the following species: Ash, Patmore Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica); Honeylocust, Seedless (Gleditsia triacanthos); Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra); and Maple,Norway (Acer Platanoides). c. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19`h Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor,the Greenway corridors located in the 50-foot setback will be characterized by informal vegetative planting of trees, shrubs, berms and groundcover for #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 6 every one hundred(100) feet of frontage along the entryway corridors as listed below. (1) A total of four(4) evergreen and deciduous trees at random or in cluster arrangements, with no more than fifty(50%)percent being deciduous, a minimum of 8-10 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (2) A total of two (2) small ornamental trees at random locations, a minimum of 8 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (3) A total of six (6) deciduous and/or coniferous large shrubs, of which three (3) shall be flowering shrubs, at random locations and a minimum of 8-1/2 feet in height at maturity, 2-3 feet installation size; Or earth berms, an average of 3.5 feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within 3 years. d. Per 18.42.150, additional information on the site lighting (cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. e. Per 18.42.170, the design and location of the trash enclosure is subject to review and approval by the City Sanitation Department, and must be shown on the final site plan. f. Per 18.44.100, sight vision triangles must be correctly depicted on the final site plan. g. Per 18.46.040.C.2, ADR staff approves a 5% reduction in the number of required parking spaces from 42 to 40 in exchange for the provision of 700 square feet of landscaping in addition to the required amount of landscaping. These improvements must be placed in the public right-of-way or yards directly facing the right-of-way. h. Per 18.48.050.B and 060.B.3, screening is required for residential adjacency along the west side in accordance with the landscaping standards. i. Per 18.52.060,a comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two or more tenant spaces on a lot and shall be designed in accordance with §18.52.070, BMC. j. Per 18.52.060, the total permitted signage shall not exceed 400 square feet, and one freestanding sign is permitted. The location of the freestanding sign shall be shown on the Final Site Plan and landscape plan. Signage is subject to ADR review and approval, and a sign permit. k. Per 18.34.140, seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six (6) months of the date of preliminary approval. I. Per 18.64.100, a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one(1)year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,providing that such activity does not include excavation for foundations or the removal of mature, healthy vegetation, #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 7 1 and NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. in. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Site Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary site plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. i The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Staff has found the application in general compliance with all other applicable law,ordinances, and regulations,and the applicant is required to provide copies of all applicable permits prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. Relationship of site plan elements to conditions both on and off the property. With the conditions outlined by the DRC and the DRB,the elements of the PT Land PUD plan including the land use patterns, circulation, and open space are arranged in an appropriate manner for a commercial development and would be compatible with the conditions both on and off the property. 5. The impact of the proposal on the existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions. The project's impact on the existing and anticipated traffic is addressed by implementing all of the recommendations made in the Traffic Impact Study for the PT Land Property by Belin Traffic Services,dated May 2006. This is reflected in conditions of approval for the preliminary plat as required by the City Engineer,which included improvements to adjacent streets and appropriate intersections. 6. Pedestrian and vehicular ingress, egress and circulation. Pedestrian circulation is provided throughout the project with sidewalks and a trail. With the exception of the sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane, staff does not support applicant's requests for relaxations from requirements for pedestrian and street connections. The PUD plan includes interior subdivision streets with access off of Baxter Lane,North I Vh Avenue,North 151h Avenue and Oak Street. All lots are provided with vehicular access either from local streets and/or shared access points. 7. Landscaping, including the enhancement of buildings, the appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian areas, and the preservation or replacement of natural vegetation. Per Section 18.48.020, planned unit development landscaping plans shall meet or exceed the standards of these landscaping regulations. 8. Open space. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development,in West Oak Street entryway #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 8 . �� • t !�+ it 1 ' 1� fig` ` I' I � � � � I � 1 1 . /' i t � .. i4 �� .� ��,P � it � �' i � 1'� j_ �! i �Y �I IL , '+ I � �, �� F r .,� � �� corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. �. Building location and height. Maximum building height for each residential district shall be as follows: Residential Building Height Table Maximum Building Height in Feet Roof Pitch in Feet B-2 Less than 3:12 38 3:12 or greater 44 Maximum height allowed by above may be increased by up to a maximum of 50 percent when the B-2 zoning district is implementing a Regional Commercial and Services growth policy land use designation. Maximum height otherwise cumulatively allowed by this section may be increased by 30 percent through the approval of a conditional use permit,but only wh,-r the additional height is a specifically identified purpose of the review. 10. Setbacks. Minimum yards required for the B-2 district is: 1. Buildings: Front yard—7 feet, except along arterials where minimum is 2.5 feet Rear yard— 10 feet Side yards—5 feet(except zero lot lines as allowed by §18.38.060, BMQ 2. Parking and loading areas: Front yard—25 feet Rear yard— 10 feet Side yards—8 feet 11. Lighting. The project will need to provide lighting in accordance with Section 18.42.150. Prior to final plan and plat approval, staff will review lighting plans for conformance with the code. 12. Provisions for utilities, including efficient public services and facilities. The project will need to provide utilities in accordance with.the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The design reports for utilities have been submitted to the Engineering Department for review. 13. Site surface drainage and storm water control. Storm water detention areas have been shown of the plan. The de s::gn report for storm water control has been submitted to the Engineering Department for revi--w. 14. Loading and unloading areas. Loading areas will be reviewed at the time of applicable site plans. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 9 f 1 15. Grading. Plans and specifications for utilities. roads and storm water control will have to address grading and be submitted to the Engineering Department for review. 16. Signage. All signage will need to comply with Chapter 52. 17. Screening. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1,2,and 3,Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve aminimum of 23 landscaping points. Scr--enin.g is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.13.3. 18. Overlay district provisions. DESIGN OBJECTIVES PLAN CRITERIA 1. Neighborhood Design (pages 9-14 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Green Space-The existing watercourses,setbacks and wetlands are being preserved as green spaces.The stormwater detention facilities are located within the green space.The r Oak Street setback will be landscaped to Design Objectives Plan standards. B. Auto Connections-Shared accesses are required on North 11`h and North 150'Avenues. C. Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections-Sidewalks will connect to regional trails.The key pedestrian system along Oak Street will be continued. Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1, 4, and 5) have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 151n Avenue north of Patrick.In addition,a relaxation(10)have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block }. D. Street Character-The Oak Street setback has a coordinated landscaping design to help create a shared identit�. 2. Site Design (pages 15-36 of the Design Objectives Plan): ' A. Natural Features - The existing watercourses, setbacks and wetlands are being 1 preserved as green spaces. B. Views - This building.should not significantly obstruct views. C. Cultural Resources—There are no known cultural resources. D. Topography—Site work is planned to protect topographic assets. E. Site Drainage—Storm drains are piped,with the stormwater detention facilities located in the green space. F. Building Placement — The buildings in this PUD are not clustered. The American Federal Savings Bank has been designed for maximum solar advantage and has a skylight incorporated. G. Outdoor Public Spaces — American Federal Savings Bank has designed an outdoor public space in front of the main entrance. H. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems—Sidewalks will connect to regional trails. The key pedestrian system along Oak Street will be continued. Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1, 4, and 5) have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Prelim�ary Plan Staff Report 10 • • 151n Avenue north of Patrick. In addition, a relaxation (10) have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. I. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems-Shared accesses are required on North 1 ltn and North 151n Avenues. J. Parking Lots — The parking for American Federal Savings Bank will be minimized through the use of landscaping in lieu of parking. K. Site Lighting—Lighting will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. L. Utilities and Service Areas—Service areas are oriented away from the major streets and integrated into the building design. M. Landscape Design—Drought tolerant materials are proposed. N. Buffers—Landscaped buffers are provided and must be enhanced to buffer incompatible uses. 3. Building Design (pages 37-48 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Building& Topography -The building follows the general lay of the land. B. Building Character- The building reflects the regional urban character. C. Primary Building Entrance - The primary building entrance faces west towards a pedestrian plaza and the parking area. D. Street Level Interest - Materials and details must be used as shown on the elevation study of the buildings to provide street level interest. E. Building Mass & Scale-The American Federal Savings Bank is approximately 21,000 square feet in total floor area with 14,718 on the main floor and 5,166 on the second floor, 37 feet in height for the overall mass with the second floor stepped back about 14 feet. F. Roof Form- The primary roof form is sloped with both hip and exposed gable ends. There are overhanging eaves and multiple roof planes. G. Building Materials- The plans depict brick veneer, cultured stone veneer, metallic insets,heavy timber accents,and asphalt or standing seam metal roof. Staff recommends use of the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the color renderings. H. Building Complex - This PUD is divided into 4 areas which planned to use different rooflines and similar materials. I. Service Canopies-Not applicable. The policy is specific to gas station canopy design. J. Color-The guidelines recommend natural tones to blend in and reduce perceived scale. The primary building elements are in stone,wood,and earth tones with bolder colors in the signage. K. Utilities & Mechanical Equipment- The Bozeman Municipal Code and the Design Objectives Plan require all mechanical equipment to be screened from view. The elevations do not depict any roof top mounted mechanical equipment. The Final Site Plan for each building shall identify the location of all mechanical equipment and identify the method of screening. #Z-05230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 11 t • �l � d �� { _ ' t� .. ;, 1t f 1 �I 'I �F . �►' i I� ,�' ,� . ,� � ` � i ' �� i, i i � Ip .-.,�.,. I� _ i, 4. Sign Design (pages 49-56 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Sign Context & Position — A comprehensive sign plan is required --or the American Federal Savings Bank property. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. B. Sign Type—One freestanding sign is permitted per lot. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code C. Sign Materials—White backgrounds are not appropriate.All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. D. Sign Lighting — Internal illumination is discouraged. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. E. Sign Content-All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. F. Wall Murals -Not applicable. 5. Corridor Specific Guidelines: North 190 Avenue & Oak Street Corridor(pages 69-79 of the Design Objectives Plan) 1. Existing agricultural site features and/or resources should be integrated into a newer development when feasible -Not applicable. 2. Create a"green edge"along the front of the property-PT LanC is responsible for the installation of landscaping within the 50 foot setback. The landscape plan will need to be revised to meet the minimum landscaping requirements for the North 19`n Avenue and Oak Street corridors. 3. Minimize the impact of parking lots - A landscaped setback is p_evided to minimize the visual impact of the parking lot. 4. A detached pedestrian and bike boulevard trail shall be provided in the setback - PT Land is responsible for the installation of the path along Oak Street. 5. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and between projects — Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations(1,4, and 5)have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 15t'Avenue north of Patrick. In addition,a relaxation(10)have been reques7,ed to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. 6. Building Materials - The corridor specific guidelines suggest that wood and masonry are the preferred exterior wall finishes. The primary material proposed is brick veneer,cultured stone veneer,metallic insets,heavy timber accents,and asphalt or standing seam metal roof. Staff recommends requiring the use of the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands)as shown on the elevation study rather than the color renderings. 7. Streetscape Elements - Streetscape elements will be provided with the installation of improvements for this PUD, site plan and Subdivision. 8. Sign Type-Freestanding signs are proposed.A comprehensive sign pla-=is required for the American Federal Savings Plan property. 9. Sign Design Attributes -The signs will provide accent color and interest. Interstate 90(pages 100-102 of the Design Objectives Plan): 1. The highway edge should be primarily"natural'in character with fixative trees #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 12 and related plantings at interchanges - This property does not directly abut the highway however, the 50 foot landscaped setback from the road right-of-way will ensure a green area. 2. Provide site and building improvements to the side of the buildings that face the Interstate - Site plans will be review in accordance with Design Objectives Plan. 3. Reduce the visual impact of industrial operations - Site plans will be review in accordance with Design Objectives Plan. 19. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties. Not applicable. 20.If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirements of this title,whether the lots are either: a.Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming. Not applicable. Section 18.34.100"City Commission Consideration and Findings for Conditional Use Permits" In addition to the review criteria outlined above, the City Commission shall, in approving a conditional use permit, find favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. This Planned Unit Development application for a commercial development includes a request for numerous relaxations from the Bozeman Municipal Code.Other than the relaxations noted above and the conditions recommended for approval, the site is generally adequate in size and topography to accommodate the potential uses and related site improvements. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. This project is in a commercially zoned area and is bordered on two sides by major roads. Therefore, it will generally have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing regulation of use. b. Special yards, spaces and buffers. Planning Staff has recommended landscaping in lieu of parking for the American Federal Savings Bank. See American Federal Savings Bank #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 13 4 condition #7: The front yard setback from North 151" Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. c. Special fences, solid fences and walls. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions regarding fencing. d. Surfacing of parkin areas.reas. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing surfacing of parking areas. e Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds. All public streets will be dedicated and improved. f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress. Planning Staff has recommended additional conditions addressing accesses as appropriate when adjacent tc arterial or collector streets. g. Regulation of signs. Planning Staff has recommended the following conditions addressing signage. PUD Condition#2:The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green),Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red) and Support Services Neighborhood(yellow)areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. American Federal Bank Site Plan Condition #1: The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses and the residential adjacency. h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing maintenance. i. Regulation of noise, vibrations and odors. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing noise, vibrations and odors. j. Regulation of hours for certain activities. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing regulation of hours for certain activities. k. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed The applicant must submit the Final Site Plan within 1 year of City Commission approval, and must undertake development of the project within 2 years of final site plan approval. 1. Duration of use. Conditional use permits run with the land, subject to application and adherence to all special conditions of approval. Planning Staff has not recommended any additional conditions addressing duration of use. #Z-061.30 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 14 in. Requiring the dedication of access rights. It is a code provision that all.rights of way be dedicated. n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the �:ity in an orderly and efficient manner. Any additional conditions stated in this approval ar-.deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Chapter 18.36 "Planned Unit Development Design Objectives and Criteria" It-addition to the review criteria outlined for site plan and conditional use permit review,the City Commission shall, in approving a planned unit development, find favorably as follows: All Development (1) Does the development comply with all City design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,trails/walks/bike ways,sanitary supply, irrigation companies, fire protection, electricity, flood hazard areas, natural gas, telephone, storm drainage, cable television, and streets? Other than the requested relaxations described above,the applicant has not requested a deviation, waiver or relaxation from any of the above listed services, and the development generally complies with city design standards. (2)Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? There is no significant natural vegetation in the project. The proposed development will mitigate the noxious weed problem on this property and replace natural vegetation. (3)Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings,circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? The elements of the site plan are designed to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development. (4) Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.)contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The availability of internal pedestrian circulation created by sidewalks,pathways, and the trail system,and the general proximity to the commercial areas contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project. (5) Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? There are no residential areas within the PUD. However,the residential areas to the west of this project will be screened by landscaping generally designed to provide a l--vel of privacy. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 15 j I ! • ` • � L t / • 1 �. l � , ` ' ' f ' e � ' �! � In � � a ' i� - ' � �� IR ' ^ . �I� ' I1 1 ` ` I` ' i 1�. 1 �� I 1 ' I+ ,� I,�` . i (I — ` 1 •i F � 111 1M Is }I r (6)Park Land.Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration,and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by §18.50.020, BMC? The design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contributed to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration. Park land is not required for a non-residential development. (7) Performance. All PUDs shall earn at least twenty performance points. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape.The code requires the applicant to demonstrate the achievement of the performance points.The open space shall be landscaped by the applicant in a manner that shall meet or exceed the standards of Chapter 18.48. (8)Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The design of the PUD provides integrated circulation patterns with connections to adjacent streets. The sidewalk system around and within the PUD will provide open access for all neighborhoods to enjoy the business and open space areas. Commercial (1)If the project contains any use intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment,does it meet the requirements for adult businesses? Not applicable. (2)Is the project contiguous to an arterial street,and has adequate but controlled access been provided? The project is adjacent Oak Street - a major arterial. Montana Department of Transportation regulates the access on Oak Street. All accesses maintain the required access separation distances. (3) Is the project on at least two acres of land? The subject property is—47 gross acres. (4)If the project contains two or more significant uses(for instance,retail,office,residential, hotel/motel and recreation), do the uses relate to each other in terms of location within the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, etc.? This project provides integration of uses through pedestrian and vehicular circulation, and utilization of common open space. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 16 4. • (5)Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of the surrounding area? The Bozeman 2020-plan has designated this area as a "Regional Commercial" land use designation. This project promotes mixed use adjacent to significant transportation route intent of this classification. (6)Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas which contain more than ten spaces? This will be addressed at individual site plan review. (7) Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance` with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? This project demonstrates compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman 2020 Plan by advancing the intent of"Regional Commercial" land use designation for the large scale mixed use adjacent to significant transportation routes. (8) Does the project provide for outdoor recreational areas (such as additional landscaped. areas,open spaces,trails or picnic areas)for the use and enjoyment of those living in,working in or visiting the development? This project contains sidewalks,a trail and open space areas for 1.he use and enjoyment of those: living around, working in or visiting the development. PUBLIC COMMENT No public comments have been received as of this date.Any public comments received after the date of this report will be distributed at the public hearing. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Staff,the Bozeman Development Review Committee(DRQ,Design Review Board(DRB) and other boards, when appropriate, have reviewed the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan with relaxations against the criteria set forth in Section 18.34.090, Section 18.34.100 and Chapter 18:36 of the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Based on the evaluation of said criteria and findings by the Planning Staff_' staff finds that the application, with conditions, is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy and the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. The following conditions of approval are recommended: PT Land PUD Plan Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed: however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green),Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red)and Support Services #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 1' Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD,the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5,Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor,and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the I-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots,Lots 2 and 3,Block 4,shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with§18.78.100 and§18.48.Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1,Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians.The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development,all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.13.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and.special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 18 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of §18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. American Federal Bank Site Plan Conditions: 1. The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses and the residential adjacency. 2. The building shall be built with the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the simplified color renderings. 3. A material board/color palette for the building,including material samples and color chips,shall be subject to review and approval by the ADR and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. The northern drive access shall be designed and designated as shared access to North 15`" Avenue (or whichevever street is the collector) with the adjoining property to the north. 5. A city standard sidewalk shall be installed along the northern drive lane from North 15'h Avenue to North 14`" Avenue to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 6. The parking lot and building shall not encroach into the 50 foot landscaped setback along Oak Street. 7. The front yard setback from North 15`"Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. 8. Trees shall not be located within 10 feet of sewer,water,and piped stormwater services. Sewer, water,and piped stormwater services shall be shown on the landscaping plans and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. 9. Fire hydrants shall not be located within 10 feet of trees and light fixtures.Fire hydrants shall be shown on landscaping and lighting plans. 10. The final site plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 19 • ;� r �� � . ��i l �4 � , ' '�: � �I' p �, _` i ii it N i q,� i� '' p� �.' �� t �W� r ,��. ,, �, ,�` �r� ��� ,. , '�;I rf. i relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 11. The elevations of American Federal Savings Bank shall be reviewed by the DRB,in accordance with the recommended changes from the informal DRB review on October 25, 2006, before Final Site Plan approval. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff,the Bozeman Development Review Committee(DRC),Design Review Board(DRB) and other boards,when appropriate,have reviewed the application#Z-06230 for a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for the PT Land Planned Unit Development(PUD)Preliminary Plan with relaxations to allow development of—47 acres and as a result recommends to the City Commission approval of said application with relaxations#1,#3,#7,#9,#11,#12,with the conditions of approval in the staff report and amended in this memo, and denial of relaxations#2, #4, #5, #6, #8, and#10. The Planning Staff has identified various code provisions that are not currently met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings and conditions of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman r Municipal Code or state law. THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A CUP FOR THE PT LAND PUD WITH RELAXATIONS. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.66 OF THE BOZEMAN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION. Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer, P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-3001 Ray Johnson, CWG Architects, 650 Power St., Helena, MT 59601 #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD Preliminary Plan Staff Report 20 ` MEMORANDUM To: Design Review Board From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Planner Date: November 8, 2006 Subject: PT Land PUD Preliminary Plan with American Federal Savings Bank Site Plan; #Z-06230 PUD Relaxations: l) 18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north slide of Baxter Lane; Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering conditions. 2) 18.44.080.A General, to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane;Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 3) 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard;Staff recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Engineering conditions. 4) 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15`h Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane without a Sidewalk on the west side; Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 5) 18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access, to not construct a pLaned collector street (North 15`h Avenue) from Tschache Lcne to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. 5) 18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets, to terminate Tschache Lane fia a dead-end near the west property line; Staff recommen ,denial bf this relaxation subject to Engineering conditions. 7) 18.42.040.B. Block Length, ro aglow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control;Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 8) 18.42.040.B. Block Length, to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length; Staff recommends denial of this relaxation: See the following condition: Plan #7, "The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians". 9) 18.42.040.C. Block Width, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation; Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. 10) 18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way -or Pedestrians, to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet;Staff recommends denial of this relaxation:See the following conditions:Plan #8, "The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a chid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for 1 ►� • • � �i 1. �,� a�i �i . Nd I�'I �'�4 �4 i ry� yy� i. �f 4 j, i' i� I'�',� ail I �'1 ,��,1 ��� �� construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat". And Plat #2; "A right of way, not less than 10,feet wide, for a city standard sidewalk, is required mid-block in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with§18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians". i ) 18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback, to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1; Staff would not generally support this relaxation but do to the specific circumstances of this project, recommends approval of this relaxation subject to following condition: Plat #4, "Storm water retention/detention facilities may be located in Zone 1 of the watercourse setback if located no closer than 30 feet to the ordinary high water mark of the watercourse. The storm water retention/detention ponds shall be designed as landscape amenities. They shall be an organic water feature with a natural, curvilinear shape. The ponds shall have 75 percent of surface area covered with live vegetation, a slope not to exceed 25%, and be lined with native grasses, indigenous plants, wet root tolerant plant types and groupings of boulders to create a functional yet, natural site feature. A cross section and landscape detail of each pond shall be submitted with the final landscape plan for review and approval". 12.) 18.42.100.B.3.c. Watercourse Setback, to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. Staff does not support this relaxation, but does recognize that there might be road design issues due to the current location of the North 1 Sly'Avenue right-of-way, and therefore recommends approval of this relaxation subject to Plat Condition #1; "The watercourse setback along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane shall be 50 feet. If a minor reduction is necessary to due to road design geometrics to facilitate the taper angle required between the existing right- of-way alignment of North 151h Avenue and the continuation of the right-of-way of North 151h Avenue to achieve a watercourse setback of 50 feet, the watercourse setback for that portion only may be reduced to not less than 35 feet for the minimum distance required to achieve the realignment". PT Land PUD Plan Conditions: 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with §18.78.100 and U8.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of U8.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. American Federal Bank Site Plan Conditions: 4. The northern drive access shall be designed and designated as shared access to North 15th Avenue (or whichevever street is the collector) with the adjoining property to the north. 2 Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92'075 American Federal Savings Bank,Larry Dreyer,P.O. Box 4999,Helena,MT 59604 Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-3001 Ray Johnson, CWG Architects, 650 Power St., Helena, MT 59601 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PRELIMINARY WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2006 MINUTES ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ATTENDANCE Chairperson Livingston called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. and directed the secretary to record the attendance. Members Present Staff Present Elisa Zavora Susan Kozub, Associate Planner Christopher Livingston Lanette Windemaker, Contract Planner Michael Pentecost Chris Saunders, Assistant Planning Director Joe Batcheller Tara Hastie, Recording Secretary Mel Howe Bill Rea Walter Banziger Visitors Present Shelly Engler Steve Domreis Ray. Johnson Keith Belden Tom Milleson Brian Caldwell Graham Goff Jami Morris Doug Minarik Craig Mendenhall Corey Greg ITEM 2. MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 2006. Ms. Zavora stated that on page 3, in the second to the last paragraph, it should read Dan La France. Mr. Rea stated that page 5 should state bicycle racks and should read LEED instead of LEAD. MOTION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost moved, Ms. Zavora seconded, to approve the minutes of October 25, 2006 with the requested corrections. The motion carried 7-0. ITEM 3. PROJECT REVIEW 1. PT Land/Perkins CUP for PUD #Z-06230 (Windemaker) Baxter/Oak/11`'/15`' (Continued from October 25, 2006.) Design Review Board Minutes-November 8,2006 1 PRELIMINARY * A Aitional Use Permit for a Planned Un*velopment with relaxations to allow for development of 18 lots for commercial and open space use on 47.62 acres generally bounded by Baxter Lane, North 1It, Avenue, West Oak Street, and North 151h Avenue with American Federal Savings Bank as the initial phase of the PUD, zoned B-2 (Community Business) District. Ray Johnson, Brian Caldwell, Shelly Engler, and Keith Belden joined the DRB. Contract Planner Lanette Windemaker presented the Staff Report noting the project's location. She stated the applicant was basically dividing the area into four sections for specific uses. She stated ADR Staff had reviewed the proposal and had recommended 13 conditions of approval on the PUD plan and 10 conditions of approval on the site plan. She stated the first phase of the PUD was the American Federal Savings Bank which would be located on the southernmost lot on the site. She added that she had inserted the condition that DRB review the PUD proposals on a site to site basis if the proposed project met the DRB review criteria. Mr. Belden stated the project was complex and contained several pieces. He stated the PUD portion of the application was attempting to transition from Oak Street to the "hospi tality/resort" section of the proposal. He stated the site plan reflected the surrounding developments and the lot lines had not been established as the purchaser of the land might want to buy two lots and boundary realignment could be done in the future. Mr. Caldwell stated that the methodology used was to consider the overlay districts the property was located within and added that the Design Objectives Plan did a quality job in ensuring well conceived designed projects. He stated the guidelines for architectural character were well addressed in the DOP. He stated the first part of the proposal's design guidel hies. addressed the industrial portion of the site; this to provide for the existing industrial developments in the area. He stated the signage was a subtle way of differentiating between the various types of development on the site. He stated the bulk of the work would be in the service/warehouse neighborhood district as it would be a Conditional use and would need details provided. He added that he thought the proposal was in keeping with the existing Kenyon Noble site. Mr. Johnson stated that the DRB had made suggestions at the last meeting and he listed those items that had been addressed. He stated that the revised elevations were not completed, but the revised site plan had been completed. He stated that the applicant had no issue with revising the elevations, renderings, and site plan to be more conforming. He stated the building footprint would be set in stone and added that there was not a color palette at this time. He stated the DRB had made very good suggestions and they would be worked into the submittal. He stated the bank may want to add an addition to their structure and the applicant preferred to leave them room on the site for that purpose. Ms. Engler stated she had the privilege of working on 1001 Oak Street, it was one of the finest landscape plans in Bozeman, and this submittal was in keeping with that property. She stated she had forgotten about the residential adjacency screening, but she would correct that problem. Mr. Johnson added that American Federal Bank would institute more landscaping Design Review Board Minutes-November 8,2006 2 than required. is WRELIMINARY Mr. Belden asked which Site Plans within the PUD would need to be reviewed by the DRB at the time of their submittal. Planner Windemaker explained the DRB's review criteria and the condition placed on the proposal by the DRB. Chairperson Livingston added that particular owners developing sites might want input from the DRB and it would give the owner more control over the aesthetic value of their proposal. Ms. Zavora asked if they had added two parking stalls in lieu of a tree. Ms. Engler responded the tree would not be removed, but relocated. Mr. Rea asked if the percentage of the area taken up by the bank would be substantial. Mr. Johnson responded there would be plenty of room to add an addition to the bank in the future and the percentage of the site that the bank would take would not be substantial. Mr. Rea asked if the DRB would be making a motion on the conditions and the memorandum. Planner Windemaker responded that the DRB would be making a motion on both Staff conditions and the memo. Mr. Caldwell suggested the removal of condition #4 from the DRC meeting stating his reason was that there were no differences and it would be difficult to demonstrate them. Mr. Rea asked for clarification of the Staff condition addressing the dead end of Tschache Lane. Planner Windemaker explained. Mr. Batcheller asked if the DRB would review every project on the site. Planner Windemaker.. responded that the DRB would review only those that met the threshold review criteria from the UDO. Ms. Zavora stated that Staff condition #5 stated that lots "may be" locate d where depicted. Planner Windemaker responded that Staff would need to know which lots are located in the entryway corridors. Vice Chairperson Pentecost stated the established development guidelines might be different for each type of proposal on the site. Mr. Caldwell responded that the differences would be in the uses and not the development itself; adding that they are intended to be similar as their locations would be right across the street from each other. Planner Windemaker responded that the applicant would need to write into the development guidelines that there would be differences in structures and uses within the site. Mr. Caldwell responded that those differences would be instituted. MOTION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost moved, Mr. Howe seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission with Staff Conditions and the addition of Site Plan Condition#11 that the revised elevations, which will indicate the recommended changes from informal DRB review on October 25, 2006, be reviewed by the DRB as a consent item. The motion died. Mr. Rea stated that relaxation request #1 of the memorandum was a request not to build a sidewalk in one location and, upon visiting the site, found he was not in support of the requested relaxation. He suggested an asphalt path be included. Planner Windemaker stated Design Review Board Minutes-November 8,2006 3 Baxter would be construc*with bike lanes, the sidewalk would , t- be ex enT)M NARY connect with North 15`h Avenue once that connection had been made. Mr. Rea responded that, for the record, he disagreed with City Engineering and added that he did not understand the reason a dead end road would be a concern for Staff. Planner Windemaker responded the applicant had requested the road end before the property line which would be the city's concern. Mr. Belden added that a financial agreement (150% financial guarantee) would be in place with the city and an agreement with the adjoining landowner would be in place as well. Mr. Caldwell added that there would be 4-10 permitting issues. Mr. Rea stated his big concern was Staff condition #5 regarding not constructing a planned collector street through to Baxter Lane; he had walked the site and thought North 15`h Avenue would be a large collector. Mr. Belden responded that an agreement had been reached to provide an alternate way to get to Baxter Lane and the Engineering Department had placed a condition on the proposal to provide for that connection. Mr. Rea suggested using North I I1h Avenue. Mr. Belden responded that North 11" Avenue was too far away. Mr. Rea stated the connection would make block 4 more valuable with more of the properties having street frontage. Mr. Belden responded that the design would shift. Mr. Rea stated he would support North 151h instead of 14`h Avenue being the connection. Chairperson Livingston added that the rest of the site would benefit if they used North 15" Avenue instead. Mr. Rea asked if the wetlands had been renovated or recreated by Lowe's. Mr. Belden responded it was a marginal wetland that had been beaten down my cattle and added that Lowe's had obliterated t/4 of an acre in the construction; he added that a wetlands mitigation plan would be in place. Chairperson Livingston stated he had one comment regarding the building entrance and the monumental and human scale in the entryway should not have 30 feet of glass to potentially blind patrons of the establishment. Vice Chairperson Pentecost suggested the applicant e-mail a digital version of the color elevations for the American Federal Savings and Loan to the DRB for review. Mr. Rea stated he was so glad to see a PUD proposed that was on the Jeffersonian grid. MOTION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost moved, Mr. Howe seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission with Staff Conditions and the addition of Site Plan Condition #I I that the revised rendered elevations of American Federal Savings, which will indicate the recommended changes from informal DRB review on October 25, 2006, be reviewed by the DRB before Final Site Plan approval. The motion carried 7-0. ITEM 4. INFORMAL REVIEW 1. Buffalo Wild Wings CUP/COA #Z-06209 (Kozub) 1783 North 19' Avenue * An Informal Application to review revised plans for the construction of a 6,759 square foot restaurant including the sale of alcohol and related site improvements, zoned M-1 (Light Manufacturing District). Design Review Board Minutes—November 8,2006 4 _ Ontana Department of Transportation. � Jim Lynch, Director serving ya.with pride 2701 Prospect Avenue Brim Schweitzer, Governor PO Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1 00 1 November 6, 2006 Jeremy Herring Morrison Maierle, Inc. F.._, _ �.., J 306 West Railroad St. �`�"�••..��,� Suite 105 Missoula,MT 59802 Subject: PT Lard Development-Bozeman The Montana De-jartment of Transportation (MDT) has reviewed the TIS and the preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan for the subject project. We have the following comments. Traffic • MDT concurs with restriping 15"' Street to left-only and through/right lanes,on both sides. • The developer must provide evidence that verifies that only 5% of vehicles will access the development via Tschache Lane. Because Tschache Lane bisects the development and has less traffic than Oak or Baxter, it seems reasonable to conclude that more motorists would be inclined to use this access. • Appendix C has many errors and discrepancies therefore the results were questionable. MDT requires that the consultant perform a reevaluation of the entire Appendix with all of the following corrected: o We would like to see the calculated PHF's factors us.-d for each turning movement at each intersection. Please display the PHF's in the printout. o Dual-lefts are not.slated at the intersection of Oak St. and N. 19". Please change this in the analysis. o Oak St. and N. 19"does not currently operate with the phasing that was used in Appendix C. There is a protected westbound left tur-i phase. Please add this change to the analysis. o Oak St. currently has a maximum cycle length of 150 seconds. Altaough this cycle length is subject to change, depending on cond!tions, it seems highly unlikely that the cycle length would average 90 seconds. Please us-- a more reasonable cycle length, i.e. 120 seconds. o Oak St. and N. 19t"will operate with an 8-phase signal timing in the future. There will be protected left turns for all directions. o Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane will have protected northbound and southbound left turn phases in the future. This signal timing change was even noted in the TIS, yet it failed to be included in the capacity analysis. o There are no 15' left turn lanes on Oak St. at its intersection with N.7"'and N. 19"'. The lanes are at most 14'. o A should be noted that MDT may not have addressee all of the errors • The developer must provide more evidence that a traffic signal is warrantee at Oak St. and 15"'Ave by providing a full signal warrant study as outlined in Chapter 4 of the 2003 MUTCD. Simply fulfilling Warrant 3 does not justify the installation of a signal. Program&Policy Analysis Bureau An Equal Opportunity Employer Rail Transit and Planning Division Phone: (406)444-3423 TTY: (800)335-7592 Fax: (406)444-7671 Web Page: www.mdt.state.mi.us T` I aize 0 • It is stated in the TIS that North 15"' Avenue is 45 ft wide with bike lanes on both sides. The typical for North 15"' Avenue shows a 42 ft width with no bike lanes. The developer must clarify this discrepancy. • MDT requires another sheet in Appendix B that shows only the traffic volumes generated by the development. • MDT requires a more explicit site map that shows where this development will access Baxter Lane. • The developer must show the location of individual accesses within the internal roadway system. • The developer must explain how growth rate for the area was calculated. This appeared to be an assumption with no evidence as to its merit. MDT will be unable to comment regarding the recommendations until the developer completes a satisfactory TIS. Hvdraulics • The report states that the outflow structures and other related detention components will be included in the Final Grading and Drainage Plan. Once this report is available MDT requires a stamped copy for our records and to verify that the outflow structure and emergency spillway are adequate. Additionally,MDT requires documentation that the City of Bozeman has approved this design. Please address the above comments and submit a revised version of the TIS and any other requested or necessary information. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (406) 444-4383. Sincerely, Ed Ereth, System Impact Action Supervisor Rail,Transit&Planning Division Copies: Jeff Ebert,Butte District Administrator Danielle Bolan,Traffic Engineer Mark Goodman, Hydraulics Engineer Lee Alt, Butte District Traffic Engineer Ross Gammon, Bozeman Area Maintenance Chief Rick Hixson, City of Bozeman Debra Arkell, Director of Public Service Bob Murray, City of Bozeman File .- RIELIMINARY Chairperson Livingston re&s. Zavora's suggestions regarding pe ials or grasses being planted in the plaza area. He stated she had also suggested balcony plantings. Chairperson Livingston stated he preferred the landscape plan with a more natural tree layout as opposed to the one depicted in a straight line and added that trees out in front would soften the structure. Mr. Bitnar responded they were creating order in front and chaos would be behind. Chairperson Livingston stated he appreciated the fact that the applicant was using green technology and being certified under the Lead System; adding that it is the wave of the future though more expensive. He stated it said something of Bozeman and its willingness toward progress. 1. PT Land/Perkins CUP for PUD #Z-06230 (Windemaker) Baxter/Oak/11 1h/15th * A Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development with relaxations to allow for development of 18 lots for commercial and open space use on 47.62 acres generally bounded by Baxter Lane, North 11th Avenue, West Oak Street, and North 15th Avenue with American Federal Savings Bank as the initial phase of the PUD, zoned B-2 (Community Business)District. Molly S.korpik, Keith Belden, and Ray Johnson joined the DRB. The DRB concurred that due to the lack of quorum and the applicant's concern regarding the City Commission's decision on the proposal without formal recommendation from the DRB, the meeting would be opened and continued. INFORMAL RECOMMENDATION: Vice Chairperson Pentecost recommended, Mr. Batcheller seconded, to open and continue the project until the next meeting of the DRB on November 8, 2006. The recommendation carried 3-0. The DRB concurred that an informal discussion would be permissible at this time. Planner Windemaker stated the site was within two Entryway Corridors and the requested relaxations were probably beyond the scope of the DRB with the possible exception of relaxation requests numbers 11 & 12. She stated Staff was in support of relaxation#11 proposing locating the storm water facilities in Zone#--1_of.the watercourse setback.if_they were designed_as-a.an organic water feature with a natural, curvilinear shape. She added that Staff would also support relaxation #12 as there might be road design issues due to the current location of the North 151h Avenue right of way. She stated Staff recommended the use of low profile monument signs and added that Staff had no real concerns with the proposal. Mr. Belden asked if the condition for low profile monument signs included the 13 foot tall example. Planner Windemaker responded that it did not and the five foot tall example was the low profile example. Planner Windemaker suggested the DRB could institute a condition to allow the board to review the proposals if they met the DRB review criteria. Chairperson Livingston stated that his concern with the proposal would be that there would be no further review for any other properties on the site; adding that not reviewing a primary piece of land in the Entryway Corridor was not acceptable for the DRB. He stated the prominence of the projects within that location Design Review Board Minutes-October 25,2006 7 P ELI- 1 NARY would become problematic Rot reviewed at the time of developme , d the DRB was not comfortable giving approval for a project that would allow the applicant to place whatever they wanted on their land. He stated the projects, including the current bank proposal, should be reviewed if they are to be located within the Entryway Corridor and he considered it the DRB's responsibility. He added that he did not particularly like the design of the bank as it was less commercial than he thought the location called for. He asked if the project would be seen as a single proposal adding that if that were the case, the whole thing would be considered within the Entryway Corridor. Planner Windemaker responded the lots could be individually reviewed upon Site Plan submittal, but the DRB could not review those lots outside the Entryway Corridors against the Design Objectives Plan. Chairperson Livingston added that he did not know what aspect of the proposal he was reviewing at this time. Mr. Belden responded that the UDO required contiguous pieces of land be reviewed as a PUD with a set of Design Guidelines; he added that there was a Plat Application, a PUD Application, and the first Site Plan for the site that would need to be reviewed. Planner Windemaker added that an upcoming UDO edit would require the applicant to submit at least an initial site plans for the PUD instead of just a master plan. Chairperson Livingston stated he thought the City Commission would have a difficult time dealing with a project of this scale being reviewed only by ADR Staff, adding that the DRB would be thought idiots. He stated the last time he checked, the Planning Director did not have an architectural, license or degree (possibly a degree) and applicants did not generally care what something looked like as long as it made money. He stated there seemed to be too much stuff proposed.for the project and it appeared "slippery" as he could not get a sense of what was really being proposed. Mr. Belden stated that there were professionals on both sides of the table and added that at least the applicants had attended the meeting as the DRB had not bothered to show up. Vice Chairperson Pentecost stated there was a series of four meetings done for the Bozeman Gateway PUD and asked why this proposal was supposed to be approved in one meeting. Planner Windemaker responded that she was uncertain why the Gateway project had been reviewed that many times, but it was not a requirement. Ms. Skorpik stated the focus of the proposed Design Guidelines was to keep conformity within the development and they had used the Design Objectives Plan in the creation of those guidelines. She asked if they had seen the uses table included in the proposal. Vice Chairperson Pentecost responded he had. He stated the requested relaxations regarding sidewalks on the north side of Baxter Lane was appropriate as sidewalks there were ridiculous as there would be no one walking there anyway, the lot arrangement and sizes would be perfectly fine, parking requirements would be fine, and he had earlier stated that the"slipperiness" of the proposal was not meant to be a legal matter but more a confusion as to what the DRB was supposed to be reviewing. Chairperson Livingston stated the DRB would be eliminated from the process and he did not want to see that happen, and the DRB had been perceived as an obstacle with their intention being to make improvements to proposals. Vice Chairperson Pentecost stated that the large stone entry on the east elevation was extremely massive and the attempt to lighten it up by poking the wood through was a tentative gesture to stop, instead of a bold gesture to make it work; he added that his first sense would be uneasiness Design Review Board Minutes—October 25,2006 g PRELIMINARY due to the entry's massive of scales. He suggested making theblack to accentuate the detail of the entry and added that the whole area around the site had turned to "brown town". Mr. Johnson responded the applicant developed the bank floor plan without elevations and the applicant would be tweaking the elements. Vice Chairperson Pentecost stated the applicant may be able to accomplish the same sense of massing with openings carved into the stone. He stated he was confused because the east elevation was different from every other elevation (materials, design, color). Mr. Johnson responded they had been doing two studies at the same time and Mr. Pentecost was very observant. Mr. Batcheller stated he agreed with Chairperson Livingston 's comments regarding the surrounding developments and he saw this property as an anchor for the pedestrian foot traffic as it seemed the site could contain a couple of structures. He suggested recapturing the commercial feel of the area. Chairperson Livingston stated there was an awful lot going on in the building and, because it would be set on an angle, there would be a lot of different materials presented to the public. Mr. Johnson responded that there were two studies being done at the same time and there would be conformity in the final result. Chairperson Livingston stated that he felt the proposal was a little busy. Mr. Johnson stated the business would be considered in the whole design of the project. Vice Chairperson.-Pentecost suggested Planner Windemaker have the applicant bring back color renderings at the next meeting of the DRB if the applicant was amenable to that. Mr. Johnson stated that CWG Architects would prepare a more cohesive rendering for the proposal. ITEM 5. PUBLIC COMMENT—(15 —20 minutes) {Limited to any public matter, within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board, not on this agenda. Three-minute time limit per speaker.} There was no public available for comment at this time. ITEM 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further comments from the DRB, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Christopher Livingston, Chairperson City of Bozeman Design Review Board Design Review Board Minutes-October 25,2006 .9 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT #Z-06230 PT LAND CUP WITH RELAXATIONS PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN Item: Zoning Application #Z-06230—An application for a Conditional Use Permit with relaxations for the PT Land Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan to allow commercial development. The property, generally bounded by Baxter Lane,North 111h Avenue,West Oak Street, and North 15`h Avenue, is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F, located in Section 1,T2S,R5E,PMM,City of Bozeman,Gallatin County, Montana. The property is zoned B-2 (Community Business District). Owner/Applicant: PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-5757. Representative: Morrison-Maierle, Inc.,3011 Palmer Street, Missoula,MT 59808. Date/Time: Design Review Board: Wednesday,October 25,2006,5:30 p.m.,Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building,20 East Olive Street,Bozeman,Montana Report By: Lanette Windemaker,AICP; Contract Planner Recommendation: Conditional Approval PROJECT LOCATION The property is generally bounded by Baxter Lane,North 11`h Avenue,West Oak Street,and North 15`h Avenue.The—47 acre property is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F,located in Section 1, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The property zoned B-2 (Community Business District) and falls within the Oak Street and the I-90 Entryway Overlay Districts. Please refer to the vicinity map on the following page. .......... Subject Property B-2 .......... 1111 IAI Oak Wo IN T[=7 r� R' R-4 PROPOSAL Application has been made the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with relaxations for the PT Land Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan, —47 acres to be developed as a commercial development. This proposal would allow 18 commercial and open space lots. American Federal Savings Bank is the initial phase of the PUD. The Design Review Board reviewed the Preapplication Plan at its March 22,2006,public meeting. The applicant has requested the following relaxations: I) 18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane; 2) 18.44.080.A General, to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane; 3) 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard; 4) 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards,to build North 150'Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane Aithout a sidewalk on the west side; 5) 18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access,to not construct a plaaned collector street(North 15th Avenue)from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as theconnection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. 6) 18.44.01 O.E.Dead-End Streets,to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end near the west property line; 7) 18.42.040.B. Block Length,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control; 8) 18.42.040.B. Block Length,to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length; #Z-06230?T Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 2 0 • 9) 18.42.040.C.Block Width,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation; 10) 18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians,to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet; 11) 18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback, to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1; and 12) 18.42.1003.3.c. Watercourse Setback, to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. Note that this proposal is also undergoing concurrent review for a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat to allow 18 lots for commercial and open space use.The subdivision and related relaxations will be evaluated by the DRC,the Planning Board, and the City Commission. ZONING DESIGNATION & LAND USES The subject property is zoned B-2(Community Business District).The intent of the B-2(Community Business District)is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets. The following land uses and zoning are adjacent to the subject property: North: B-2 (Community Business District)—I-90. East: B-2 (Community Business District) —Oak Street Place PUD and Kenyon Noble PUD. South: R-0 (Residential Office District)—office buildings. West: B-2 (Community Business District)—Bridger Peaks Village PUD and Lowes PUD. ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATION The property is currently designated as"Regional Commercial and Services"in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. This classification provides areas for retail, education, health services, public administration and tourism for a multi-county region. These facilities should be located in proximity to significant transportation routes. It is appropriate that design guidelines be established to ensure compatibility with the remainder of the community. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INTENT AND REVIEW CRITERIA The intent of Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. The applicant is proposing many relaxations from the city's standards through the Planned Unit Development process and must therefore demonstrate a plan that will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced under the existing standards. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 3 • • DESIGN OBJECTIVES PLAN CRITERIA 1. Neighborhood Design (pages 9-14 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Green Space - The existing watercourses, setbacks and wetlands are being preserved as green spaces.The stormwater detention facilities are located within the green space.The Oak Street setback will be landscaped to Design Objectives Plan standards. B. Auto Connections - Shared accesses are required on North 11`h and North 151h Avenues. C. Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections - Sidewalks will connect to regional trails. The key pedestrian system along Oak Street will be continued. Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1, 4, and 5) have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 151h Avenue north of Patrick. In addition,a relaxation(10)have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. D. Street Character - The Oak Street setback has a coordinated landscaping design to help create a shared identity. 2. Site Design (pages 15-36 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Natural Features-The existing watercourses,setbacks and wetlands are being preserved as green spaces. B. Views - This building should not significantly obstruct views. C. Cultural Resources—There are no known cultural resources. D. Topography—Site work is planned to protect topographic assets. E. Site Drainage—Storm drains are piped, with the stormwater detention facilities located in the green space. F. Building Placement—The buildings in this PUD are not clustered. The American Federal Savings Bank has been designed for maximum solar advantage and has a skylight incorporated. G. Outdoor Public Spaces—American Federal Savings Bank has designed an outdoor public space in front of the main entrance. H. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems—Sidewalks will connect to regional trails. The key pedestrian system along Oak Street will be continued. Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations (1, 4, and 5) have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 151h Avenue north of Patrick. In addition,a relaxation(10)have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. I. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems-Shared accesses are required on North 11 h and North 15th Avenues. J. Parking Lots—The parking for American Federal Savings Bank will be minimized through the use of landscaping in lieu of parking. K. Site Lighting—Lighting will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. L. Utilities and Service Areas — Service areas are oriented away from the major streets and integrated into the building design. M. Landscape Design—Drought tolerant materials are proposed. N. Buffers —Landscaped buffers are provided and must be enhanced to buffer incompatible uses. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 4 3. Building Design (pages 37-48 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Building& Topography-The building follows the general lay of the land. B. Building Character-The building reflects the regional urban character. C. Primary Building Entrance - The primary building entrance faces west towards a pedestrian plaza and the parking area. D. Street Level Interest-Materials and details must be used as shown on the elevation study of the buildings to provide street level interest. E. Building Mass & Scale- The American Federal Savings Bank is approximately 21,000 square feet in total floor area with 14,718 on the main floor and 5,166 on the second floor,37 feet in height for the overall mass with the second floor stepped back about 14 feet. F. Roof Form-The primary roof form is sloped with both hip and exposed gable ends. There are overhanging eaves and multiple roof planes. G. Building Materials- The plans depict brick veneer, cultured stone veneer, metallic insets, heavy timber accents,and asphalt or standing seam metal roof. Staff recommends use of the additional details (metallic insets, precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the color renderings. H. Building Complex - This PUD is divided into 4 areas which planned to use different rooflines and similar materials. 1. Service Canopies-Not applicable. The policy is specific to gas station canopy design. J. Color-The guidelines recommend natural tones to blend in and reduce perceived scale. The primary building elements are in stone, wood, and earth tones with bolder colors in the signage. K. Utilities & Mechanical Equipment- The Bozeman Municipal Code and the Design Objectives Plan require all mechanical equipment to be screened from view. The elevations do not depict any roof top mounted mechanical equipment. The Final Site Plan for each building shall identify the location of all mechanical equipment and identify the method of screening. 4. Sign Design (pages 49-56 of the Design Objectives Plan): A. Sign Context&Position—A comprehensive sign plan is required for the American Federal Savings Bank property. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. B. Sign Type —One freestanding sign is permitted per lot. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code C. Sign Materials — White backgrounds are not appropriate. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. D. Sign Lighting — Internal illumination is discouraged. All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. E. Sign Content- All signs will comply with the Bozeman Municipal Code. F. Wall Murals -Not applicable. 5. Corridor Specific Guidelines: North 190 Avenue & Oak Street Corridor(pages 69-79 of the Design Objectives Plan) #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 5 0 • 1. Existing agricultural site features and/or resources should be integrated into a newer development when feasible-Not applicable. 2. Create a"green edge"along the front of the property-PT Land is responsible for the installation of landscaping within the 50 foot setback.The landscape plan will need to be revised to meet the minimum landscaping requirements for the North 19`h Avenue and Oak Street corridors. 3. Minimize the impact of parking lots -A landscaped setback is provided to minimize the visual impact of the parking lot. 4. A detached pedestrian and bike boulevard trail shall be provided in the setback- PT Land is responsible for the installation of the path along Oak Street. 5. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation within and between projects—Sidewalks are provided along all internal street frontages. Relaxations(1,4, and 5)have been requested to not provide pedestrian facilities on the north side of Baxter Lane and the west side of North 151h Avenue north of Patrick. In addition, a relaxation (10) have been requested to not provide mid block pedestrian facilities in Block 3. 6. Building Materials-The corridor specific guidelines suggest that wood and masonry are the preferred exterior wall finishes. The primary material proposed is brick veneer, cultured stone veneer,metallic insets,heavy timber accents,and asphalt or standing seam metal roof. Staff recommends requiring the use of the additional details(metallic insets, precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands)as shown on the elevation study rather than the color renderings. 7. Streetscape Elements - Streetscape elements will be provided with the installation of improvements for this PUD, site plan and subdivision. 8. Sign Type-Freestanding signs are proposed.A comprehensive sign plan is required for the American Federal Savings Plan property. 9. Sign Design Attributes - The signs will provide accent color and interest. Interstate 90 (pages 100-102 of the Design Objectives Plan): 1. The highway edge should be primarily"natural'in character with native trees and related plantings at interchanges - This property does not directly abut the highway however,the 50 foot landscaped setback from the road right-of-way will ensure a green area. 2. Provide site and building improvements to the side of the buildings that face the Interstate- Site plans will be review in accordance with Design Objectives Plan. 3. Reduce the visual impact of industrial operations - Site plans will be review in accordance with Design Objectives Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Design Review Board is established to evaluate aesthetic considerations of larger and more complex proposals which are likely to produce significant community impact and to provide recommendations regarding such proposals to the Planning Director or City Commission. The Board is empowered to recommend approval or conditional approval of the project with support of some or all of the requested relaxations or to forward a recommendation of denial. The Design Review #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 6 Board may determine that some conditions of approval are necessary to meet the intent of the Planned Unit Development and to mitigate the requested relaxations. Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: PT Land PUD Plan Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red)and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD,the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5,Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor,and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the I-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots,Lots 2 and 3,Block 4,shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with§18.78.100.Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with§18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians.The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development,all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1, #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 7 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.13.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.I of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. PT Land PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460,this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 71h Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E,all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space,exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape.Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot,and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 8 • 0 zone may contribute to the required open space provision.Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan.The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19`h Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association.Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as"common open space easements"located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final PUD Plan within one(1)year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. American Federal Bank Site Plan Conditions: 1. The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses and the residential adjacency. 2. The building shall be built with the additional details(metallic insets,precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the simplified color renderings. 3. A material board/color palette for the building,including material samples and color chips,shall be subject to review and approval by the ADR and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. The northern drive access shall be designed and designated as shared access with the adjoining property to the north. 5. A city standard sidewalk shall be installed along the northern drive lane from North 15`h Avenue to North 14th Avenue to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 9 • 0 6. The parking lot and building shall not encroach into the 50 foot landscaped setback along Oak Street. 7. The front yard setback from North 15`h Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. 8. Trees shall not be located within 10 feet of sewer,water,and piped stormwater services. Sewer, water,and piped stormwater services shall be shown on the landscaping plans and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. 9. Fire hydrants shall not be located within 10 feet of trees and light fixtures.Fire hydrants shall be shown on landscaping and lighting plans. 10. The final site plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. American Federal Bank Site Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.18.050,parking areas shall have a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet from North 150' Avenue. b. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19'h Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor,street trees characterized by a formal arrangement of large canopy boulevard trees shall be located in the street right-of-way boulevards subject to the following requirements: (1) One large canopy boulevard tree, a minimum of eight(8) feet in height or 1"caliper and planted at regular intervals of fifty(50) feet on center. (2) Acceptable large canopy boulevard trees include the following species: Ash, Patmore Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica); Honeylocust, Seedless (Gleditsia triacanthos); Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra); and Maple,Norway (Acer Platanoides). c. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19`h Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, the Greenway corridors located in the 50-foot setback will be characterized by informal vegetative planting of trees,shrubs,berms and groundcover for every one hundred(100) feet of frontage along the entryway corridors as listed below. (1) A total of four(4) evergreen and deciduous trees at random or in cluster arrangements, with no more than fifty(50%)percent being deciduous, a minimum of 8-10 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (2)A total of two (2) small ornamental trees at random locations, a minimum of 8 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (3)A total of six (6) deciduous and/or coniferous large shrubs, of which three (3) shall be flowering shrubs, at random locations and a minimum of 8-1/2 feet in height at maturity, 2-3 #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 10 • 0 feet installation size; Or earth berms, an average of 3.5 feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within 3 years. d. Per 18.42.150, additional information on the site lighting (cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. e. Per 18.42.170,the design and location of the trash enclosure is subject to review and approval by the City Sanitation Department, and must be shown on the final site plan. f. Per 18.44.100, sight vision triangles must be correctly depicted on the final site plan. g. Per 18.46.040.C.2,ADR staff approves a 5%reduction in the number of required parking spaces from 42 to 40 in exchange for the provision of 700 square feet of landscaping in addition to the required amount of landscaping.These improvements must be placed in the public right-of-way or yards directly facing the right-of-way. h. Per 18.48.050.B and 060.B.3,screening is required for residential adjacency along the west side in accordance with the landscaping standards. i. Per 18.52.060, a comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two or more tenant spaces on a lot and shall be designed in accordance with §18.52.070,BMC. j. Per 18.52.060,the total permitted signage shall not exceed 400 square feet,and one freestanding sign is permitted.The location of the freestanding sign shall be shown on the Final Site Plan and landscape plan. Signage is subject to ADR review and approval, and a sign permit. k. Per 18.34.140,seven(7)copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions,corrections and modifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six (6) months of the date of preliminary approval. 1. Per 18.64.100, a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one (1) year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,providing that such activity does not include excavation for foundations or the removal of mature, healthy vegetation, and NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. m. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Site Plan review and approval,a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary site plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends conditional approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the PT Land Planned Unit #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 11 • 0 Development Preliminary Plan application #Z-06230. The applicant must comply with all other provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan, Final Plat or Building Permit approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. NOTE: Both the Design Review Board and Development Review Committee will forward a formal recommendation to the City Commission for consideration and final action on December 11,2006. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal. Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer, P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-3001 #Z-06230 PT Land CUP/PUD DRB Staff Report 12 POD O-A �s fij , us • �na �� � -Tlr v - F • r t •_ t f +� Y • • MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee f From: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Contract Planner Date: October 25, 2006—Final Week Review Subject: PT Land PUD Preliminary Plan with American Federal Savings Bank Site Plan and Preliminary Plat; #Z-06230 &#P-06057 PUD Relaxations: A) 18.44.080.A General, to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane; Staff would not generally support this relaxation, but due to the specific circumstances of this project, recommends approval of this relaxation subject to conditions. B) 18.44.080.A General, to build a 10-foot asphalt Trail instead of a sidewalk on the south s=de of Baxter Lane;Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. C) 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard; Due to the existing right-of-way width to the south, Staff recommends appro-ml of this relaxation subject to conditions. D) 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards, to build North 15`" Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the west side; Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. E) 18.44 Transportation Facilities and Access, to not construct a planned collep.,tor street (North 15`" Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot w_de private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. F) 18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets, to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end n--ar the west property line; ;Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. G) 18.42.040.B. Block Length, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control; Staff recommends approval,of this relaxation. H) 18.42.040.B. Block Length, to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length; Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See the following conditions:Plan 97. I) 18.42.040.C. Block Width, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation; Staff recommends approval of this relaxation. J) 18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians, to not provide a right-of-way with pedestr-an walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet;-Staff recommends denial of this relaxation. See the following conditions:Plan #8 and Plat#2. K) 18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback, to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1; Staff would not generally support this relaxation but dale to the specific circumstances of this project, recommends approval of this relaxation subject to ;he following condition:Plat#4. L) 18.42.100.B.3.c. Watercourse Setback, to reduce The watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. Staff does not support this relaxation, but does recognize that there migh! be road design issues due to,the current 1 location of the North 15'h Avenue right-of-way, and therefore recommends approval of this relaxation subject to the following condition:Plat V. PT Land PUD Plan Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on' internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with §18.78.100. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.13.3. 2 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to Section 18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. PT Land PUD Plan Code Provisions: a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7ch Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by .a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. The 3 • , • ' � r r 1 .. ,�� ,,, �' .;^, f� :� ��� I�� �'.� �; �'� �t, iif, IF� i �. ' I�I r i�', ,�� �� 1 '� ��� • 0 applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19`h Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. Plat Conditions: The watercourse setback along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane shall be 50 feet. If a minor reduction is necessary to due to road design geometrics to facilitate the taper angle required between the existing right-of-way alignment of North 151h Avenue and the continuation of the right-of-way of North 151h Avenue to achieve a watercourse setback of 50 feet, the watercourse setback for that portion only may be reduced to not less than 35 feet for the minimum distance required to achieved the realignment. 2. A right of way, not less than 10 feet wide, for a city standard sidewalk, is required mid-block in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with 518.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 3. A Concurrent Construction Plan, for an approved lot-specific final site plan, addressing all requirements of 18.74.030.D, shall be submitted for review and approval of the Planning Director with a recommendation from the Development Review Committee. 4. Storm water retention/detention facilities may be located in Zone 1 of the watercourse setback if located no closer than 30 feet to the ordinary high water mark of the watercourse. The storm water retention/detention ponds shall be designed as landscape amenities. They shall be an organic water feature with a natural, curvilinear shape. The ponds shall have 75 percent of surface area covered with live vegetation, and be lined with native grasses, indigenous plants, wet root tolerant plant types and groupings of boulders to create a functional yet, natural site feature. A cross section and landscape detail of each pond shall be submitted with the final landscape plan for review and approval. 5. Covenants shall address the requirements for street trees, a COB planting permit for street trees and obtaining utility locates before any excavation begins in the COB right of way. 4 f � • . � . • l �. �� �� �� ►� ,, 1F', , ,� ,,, ��l V" t, �f' �, r �i �� a �� IFi ��I -� y r� �, �� }� � � �.I �E `� 6. Water rights, or cash-in-lieu thereof, as calculated by the City Engineer, is due with the final plat. T The open space shall be titled "Open Space, Public Access". Notes shall be included on the plat describing ownership and maintenance responsibility for the open space, e.g.: open space, public access, owned by the property owners association, maintained by the property owners association, etc. 8.. Subdivision lighting SILD information shall be submitted to the Clerk of Commission directly after Preliminary Plat approval in hard copy and digital form. The final plat will not be deemed complete until the resolution to create the SILD has been approved by the City Commission. 9. Buildings proposed for construction with crawl spaces or basements shall include Engineer Certification regarding depth of ground water and soil conditions and proposed mitigation methods to be submitted with each Building Permit. The Final Plat shall include a notation that due to high ground water conditions full or partial basements are not recommended. 11). Applicant shall provide a soils report, along with building plans, to the Building Division, recommending types of foundations. If development shall occur in phases, the soils report may address those lots within the proposed phase. 11. Applicant shall ensure that all original tract(s) of record of this property that are or through the phasing of this subdivision will become remainder tract(s) of less than 160 acres were not created for purposes of transfer, and that no transfer or conveyance of said tracts will occur prior to filing of a subdivision plat reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman. The evidence shall be in a written form to be filed with the final plat. A executed documents shall be submitted with the final plat. The tract(s) shall be legally described and the following statement shall be placed on the tract(s): "No instrument of transfer of this tract may be recorded prior to filing of a subdivision plat reviewed and approved by the City of Bozeman." 12. The final plat shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Plat Code Provisions: a. Per 18.42.150, street light support structures shall not exceed 25 feet on local streets and are only required at street and pedestrian intersections. Additional information on the street lighting(cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. b Per Section 18.50.090 of the BMC, executed waivers of right to protest creation of special improvement districts (SIDs) for a park maintenance district shall be executed and submitted with the final plat to be filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder at the time of final plat recordation. 5 c. Covenants, restrictions, and articles of incorporation for the creation of a property owners' association shall be submitted with the final plat application for review and approval by the Planning Office and shall contain, but not be limited to, provisions for assessment, maintenance, repair and upkeep of common open space areas, public parkland/open space corridors, stormwater facilities, public trails, snow removal, and other areas common to the association pursuant to Chapter 18.72 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. • These documents shall include a common area and facility maintenance plan and. guarantee for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, and. stormwater facilities in accordance with Chapter 18.72 or the Bozeman Municipal Code. • These documents shall be submitted to the city attorney and shall not be accepted by the city until approved as to legal form and effect. A draft of these documents must be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department at least 45 working days prior to filing and recordation with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. • These documents shall be executed and submitted with the final plat to be filed with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder at the time of final plat recordation. d. The Final Plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required. documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The Final Plat application shall include four (4) signed reproducible copies on a 3 mil or heavier stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 3-1/2" floppy disk; and five (5)paper prints. e. Pursuant to Section. 18.06.040.D.6 of the BMC, conditional approval of the Preliminary Plat shall be in force for not more than one calendar year for minor subdivisions, two years for single-phased major subdivisions and three years for multi-phased major subdivisions. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. The City Commission may, at the written request of the developer, extend its approval for no more than one calendar year, except that the City Commission may extend its approval for a period of more than one year if that approval period is included as a specific condition of a written subdivision improvements agreement between the City Commission and the developer, provided for in §18.74.060, BMC. f. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to installation, certification, and acceptance of all required improvements by the City of Bozeman, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the Preliminary Plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If' the Final Plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval has been satisfactorily addressed. American Federal Bank Site Plan Conditions: 6 1. The one freestanding sign shall be a low profile monument type sign in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses and the residential adjacency. 2. The building shall be built with the additional details (metallic insets, precast concrete insets and precast concrete bands) as shown on the elevation study rather than the simplified color renderings. 3. A material board/color palette for the building, including material samples and color chips, shall be subject to review and approval by the ADR and Planning Department prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. The northern drive access shall be designed and designated as shared access to North 15th Avenue with the adjoining property to the north. 5. A city standard sidewalk shall be installed along the northern drive lane from North 15th Avenue to North 14th Avenue to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet in accordance with§18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 6. The parking lot and building shall not encroach into the 50 foot landscaped setback along Oak Street. 7. The front yard setback from North 15th Avenue shall be increased from the required 25 feet to 28.25 feet to provide landscaping in lieu of parking. 8. Trees shall not be located within 10 feet of sewer, water, and piped stormwater services. Sewer, water, and piped stormwater services shall be shown on the landscaping plans and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. 9. Fire hydrants shall not be located within 10 feet of trees and light fixtures. Fire hydrants shall be shown on landscaping and lighting plans. 10. The final site plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. American Federal Bank Site Plan Code Provisions: a., Per 18.18.050, parking areas shall have a minimum front yard setback of 25 feet from North 15th Avenue. b. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 190' Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, street trees characterized by a formal arrangement of large canopy boulevard trees shall be located in the street right-of-way boulevards subject to the following requirements: (1) One large canopy boulevard tree, a minimum of eight{8) feet in height or 1" caliper and planted at regular intervals of fifty (50) feet on center. 7 (2)Acceptable large canopy boulevard trees include the following species: Ash, Patmore Green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica); Honeylocust, Seedless (Gleditsia triacanthos); Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra); and Maple,Norway (Acer Platanoides). c. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19'' Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, the Greenway corridors located in the 50-foot setback will be characterized by informal vegetative planting of trees, shrubs, berms and groundcover for every one hundred (100) feet of frontage along the entryway corridors as listed below. (1)A total of four(4) evergreen and deciduous trees at random or in cluster arrangements, with no more than fifty (50%)percent being deciduous, a minimum of 8-10 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (2)A total of two (2) small ornamental trees at random locations, a minimum of 8 feet in height, or 1-1/2" caliper; (3) A total of six (6) deciduous and/or coniferous large shrubs, of which three (3) shall be flowering shrubs, at random locations and a minimum of 8-1/2 feet in height at maturity, 2-3 feet installation size; Or earth berms, an average of 3.5 feet in height,planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within 3 years. d. Per 18.42.150, additional information on the site lighting (cut sheets, etc.) is required to demonstrate compliance with the BMC. e. Per 18.42.170, the design and location of the trash enclosure is subject to review and approval by the City Sanitation Department, and must be shown on the final site plan. f. Per 18.44.100, sight vision triangles must be correctly depicted on the final site plan. g. Per 18.46.040.C.2, ADR staff approves a 5% reduction in the number of required parking spaces from 42 to 40 in exchange for the provision of 700 square feet of landscaping in addition to the required amount of landscaping. These improvements must be placed in the public right-of-way or yards directly facing the right-of-way. h. Per 18.48.050.B and 060.B.3, screening is required for residential adjacency along the west side in accordance with the landscaping standards. i. Per 18.52.060, a comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two or more tenant spaces on a lot and shall be designed in accordance with §18.52.070, BMC. j. Per 18.52.060, the total permitted signage shall not exceed 400 square feet, and one freestanding sign is permitted. The location of the freestanding sign shall be shown on the Final Site Plan and landscape plan. Signage is subject to ADR review and approval, and a sign permit. k. Per 18.34.140, seven (7) copies of the Final Site Plan containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director within six (6)months of the date of preliminary approval. 1. Per 18.64.100, a Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one (1) year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the 8 Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan; providing that such activity does not include excavation for foundations or the removal of mature, healthy vegetation; and NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. m. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Site Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary site plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. 9 IE OCT 2 0 2006 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Jon Henderson,Bicycle Advisory Board Ross Gammon,Montana Department of Transportation ROSS GAMMON Sandra Straehl,MDOT-Highway Planning Bureau 907 N. ROUSE AVE. Gary Vodehnal, Gallatin Valley Land Trust BO Z EMAN, MT 59715 Ralph Zimmer,Pedestrian&Traffic Safety Committee FROM: Tara Hastie, Administrative Assistant RE: Perkins MaSub Prel. Plat #P-06057 and Prel. Plan PUD #Z-06230 DATE: September 27, 2006 Attached you will find the variance application for the proposed Major Subdivision referenced above requesting the subdivision of 47.62 acres into 18 lots for phased commercial development, zoned B-2 (Community Business)District. The property is legally described as Tract 2A of COS 1215F Gallatin County,Montana, and is generally located north of Oak Street, west of North 11 d,Avenue, east of North 15�'Avenue, and south of Baxter Lane. Please review the attached information and provide comments to this office no later than Wednesday, October 25,2006. The proposals will be discussed by the Development Review Committee on Wednesdays, October 11, 18, and 25, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. in the upstairs Conference Room of the Alfred Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street. The Planning Board public meeting on the proposal has been tentatively scheduled for Tuesday,November 21,2006,at 7:00 p.rr_., in the 3`d Floor Community Meeting Room at the County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street. The City Commission public meeting for the proposal has been tentatively scheduled for Monday,December 11,2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Meeting Room, 3`d Floor at the County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street. You are welcome and encouraged to attend these meetings. Please return all materials as thev are needed for packets for Planning Board and City Commission. If you are unable to respond in writing by the above deadline or if you have questions or concerns regarding the application, we ask that you contact Contract Planner Lanette Windemaker at 586-5266. Thank you for your cooperation. TH/th Attachments CC: PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 N. Wallace Ave., Bozeman,MT 59715 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer,P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 Morrison-Maierle, Inc.,Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer St., Missoula,MT 59808 Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 N. Wallace Ave., Bozeman,MT 59715 Dave Hutchinson,P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 Page 1 of 2 Tara L. Hastie From: Sweet Pea (sweetpea@montana.netj Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:21 PM To: Tara L. Hastie Cc: Bill Rea; Walter Banziger; Joe Batcheller; Mel Howe; Michael Pentecost; Christopher Livingston Subject: Re: DRB Ta ra, I do not know if you will get this in time, but I am unable to get away from work to make it to the muting. I am sending this to Chris too. I tried to call him but could only leave a msg. For the record, these are my comments I would make if I were there OK with the consent item re: Walton Homestead PT Land/Perkins I was confused by the recommendations, it was in a different format that I am used to. It looks I:ke they addressed all the landscape issues by requiring plans and endorsements from professionals. I am concerned about the decrease with the watercourse set back. I am hoping that other board members have this concern too and will address it. Bank of Bozeman None of the comments I made from the previous review were addressed. The color rendering is not what is represented in the plan. It is not acceptable for the archectitire and I do not think that it is acceptable for the landscape. At this point I am offended, I asked for a clear representation once before and this request was ignored. There are still incorrect notes on the plan, referring to the first line of the landscape notes saying that blvd. trees be planted 2'from sidewalk, then the last line saying no tree will be planted 4' from:sidewalks. I pointed this out before and it was not addressed. Other than that, I agree with the comments =rom staff regarding the changes to the landscape. Sandholm/Bidegaray They need to get some evergreen plant material in there. A little more species diversity would 'ielp too. If they want to only use 3 types of shrubs (as is outlined) I suggest that they at least be of different mature sizes i.e. small, med, large. (right now they have one species of 4'tall, and two species that each are 8'-10"1 Also, the trash enclosure should have some additional screening, this would be a good place to use some evergreen shrubs. There is a transformer in the front of the yard that has no landscaping. A bed around this could improve the site for the better. The plan is not signed by a landscape professional, did they use one? I would require that a professional sign the project. Burgard Bldg I agree with staff comments, especially about adding some landscaping to the pecestrian area. T-iis would be a great place for an in the ground planter with perennials or grasses. I would want to know if the architect is concerned about no plantings on the N. side. I know it is the shady side, but it seerrs that even some overhanging balcony planters or potted containers on the balconies would soften the look. Perhaps the designer wanted to stark glass look, in which I can see the minimalist idea he is going for. If he has not t)ough:about it then I wish I was there to bring it up. I am so sorry I could not make it in person. I do not know if this will reach anyone iR time. I know ;hat by not being there I am giving up my voice, so this is my effort to be heard. Thanks, Elissaw ----- Original Message ----- 10/25/2006 B02� THE CITY OF BOZEMAN i Uti� 9x 20 E. OLIVE• P.O. BOX 1230 * * BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59771-1230 9�t 883 `�� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CO O� PHONE: (406) 582-2280 • FAX: (406) 582-2263 October 25, 2006 To: Development Review Committee From: Dustin Johnson, Project Engineer; Lanette Windemaker, Planner Re: PT Land/Perkins CUP for PUD,#Z-06230 American Federal Savings Bank Site Plan The following should be included as Final Site Plan(FSP) conditions for any approval of this project: Standard conditions/code provisions: 1. The Final Site Plan shall be adequately dimensioned. A complete legend of all line types used shall also be provided. 2. A Storm Water Drainage/Treatment Grading Plan and Maintenance?lan for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and oT-her pollutants must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The plan must demonstrate adequate site drainage (including sufficient spot elevations), storm water detention/retention basin details (including basin sizing and discharge calculations, and discharge structure details), storm water discharge destination, and a storm water maintenance plan. 3. Sewer and water services shall be shown on the FSP and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. City of Bozeman applications for service shall be completed by the applicant. All existing and proposed fire hydrants shall be shown on the FSP. 4. Plans and Specifications for any fire service line must be prepared in accordance with the City's Fire Service Line Policy by a Professional Engineer (PE), and be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to initiation of construction of the fire service or fire protection system. The applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. If the Fire Service stub is not utilized the owner must abandon the line at the main. HOME OF MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY GATEWAY TO YELLOWSTONE PARK 5. Typical curb details (i.e., raised and/or drop curbs) and typical asphalt paving section detail shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. Concrete . curbing shall be provided around the entire new parking lot perimeter and adequately identified on the FSP. 6. All existing utility and other easements must be shown on the FSP. 7. All trees must be at least 10 feet from any public utilities or service lines, iricluding storm sewer lines. Public utilities and services lines must be shown on the Final Landscaping plan. 8. Adequate snow storage area must be designated outside the sight triangles, but on . the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office). 9. The drive approach shall be constructed in accordance with the City's standard approach (i.e., concrete apron, sidewalk section and drop-curb) and shown as such on the FSP. A City Curb Cut and Sidewalk Permit shall be obtained prior to FSP approval. 10. City standard sidewalk shall be installed and properly depicted at the standard location (i.e., 1 foot off property line) along the street(s) frontage. Any deviation to the standard alignment or location must be approved by the City Engineer. 11. Drive approach and public street intersection sight triangles shall be free of plantings which at mature growth will obscure vision within the sight triangle. 12. The applicant shall submit a construction route map dictating how materials and heavy equipment will travel to and from the site in accordance with section 18.74.020.A.1 of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall be submitted as part of the final site plan for site developments, or with the infrastructure plans for subdivisions. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the construction traffic follows the approved routes. 13. All.construction activities shall comply with section 18.74.020.A.2. of the Unified Development Ordinance. This shall include routine cleaning/sweeping of material that is dragged to adjacent streets. The City may require a guarantee as allowed for under this section at any time during the construction to ensure any damages or cleaning that are required are complete. The developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the work if it becomes necessary for the City to correct any problems that are identified. r� Proiect Specific Conditions: 14. Any proposed drive accesses for this development must meet all minimum separation distances outlined in the UDO section 18.44.090, or line up directly with adjacent accesses. 15. Access onto North 15`" Ave. from this lot shall utilize a shared two way access on the northern property line. The access will align with any existing access on the opposite side of the street or meet all necessary separation requirements. 16. All proposed accesses and traffic circulation patterns will be approved by the City of Bozeman fire and engineering departments prior to final site plan approval. 17. A 10 foot wide asphalt pathway must be installed the length of the lot on the south side of the property along Oak Street. This pathway must provide ADA approved access the entire length of the lot. 18. A fire hydrant is shown within the proposed access located on North 14`" Ave. This hydrant will need to be relocated if this drive access is to remain in its proposed location. cc: ERF Project File CIOOF BOZEMAN 40 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT phone 406-582-2260 Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building fax 406-582-2263 20 East Olive Street planning@bozeman.net P.O. Box 1230 www.bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 October 17, 2006 PT Land Jerry Perkins 511 North Wallace Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715-5757 l RE: PT Land Preliminary PUD Application,#Z-06230 PT Land Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application, #P-06057 Dear Jerry: The above-referenced PUD Preliminary Plan and Subdivision Preliminary Plat applications are under review by the Development Review Committee (DRC). The DRC has found that the application and required elements contain detailed, supporting information that is sufficient to allow for the review of the above-referenced PUD Preliminary Plan and Subdivision Preliminary Plat applications Please note, a determination that an application contains sufficient _nformation for review does not ensure that the proposed application(s) will be approved or conditionally approved by the City Commission, and does not limit the ability of the City of Bozeman -o request additional information during the review process. The Bozeman Planning Board will discuss the Preliminary Plat application at a public hearing on Tuesday, November 21, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. The City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the applications on Monday, December 11, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. Both me-.ting.s are held at the third floor Community Room, Gallatin County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street, Bozeman, Montana. You are encouraged to attend the Planning Board and City Commission meetings to answer any questions that may arise. Please feel free to contact me at 586-5266 if you have any questions, regarding the application or the review process in general. Sincerely, 1 Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner Cc: Morrison-Maierle, Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer Street, MissoulE, MT 59808 Dave Hutchinson, P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer, P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 Thinktank, Brian Caldwell, 600 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-3001 planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination r CI*F BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � u_D I Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 ;•.�„ 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net August 8, 2006 PT Land Jerry Perkins 511 North Wallace Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Perkins PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat Dear Jerry: The above-referenced PUD Preliminary Plan/ Preliminary Plat applications were received on July 28, 2006, and met the application deadline of 5:00 PM on Tuesday, August 1, 2006. They have been assigned to Contract Planner, Lanette Windemaker. The applications ;were reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklists and Title 18 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The applications do not contain all of the required information and have been deemed incomplete. The following submittal materials and/or information were not provided or need to be clarified: 1. It appears that PUD relaxations have been requested from the following sections of the BMC. Please review these relaxations carefully to ensure that they are correctly described. 18.44.080.A General. To not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane. 18.44.080.A General. To build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane. 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards. To build North 15rh Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Street to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard. 18.44.010.A. Relation to Undeveloped Areas. To not extend North 15`h (or 14`h) Avenue from Tschache Street to the north boundary line at Baxter Lane. 18.44.01O.B. Relation to Developed Areas. To not provide for a continuation of North 151h (or 141h) Avenue north from Tschache Street to Baxter Lane. 18.44.01 O.E. Dead-End Streets. To terminate Tschache Street in a dead-end near the west property line. 18.42.040.B. Block Length. To allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control. 18.42.040.B. Block Length. To allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length. 18.42.040.C. Block Width. To allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome speci is disadvantages of topography and orientation. 18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. To not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet. 2. All require relaxations must be requested or the project must comply with the regulations. The "Response to PreApplication Comments" indicates that you will be requesting a relaxation to Section 18.42.100.B.3.c Watercourse Setback, but this relaxation has not been formally requested. Please clarify this issue. planning • zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination • 0 3. 18.78.050.H: A noxious weed management and revegetation plan approved by the district for control of noxious weeds shall be submitted with the preliminary plat application. Your request of undue hardship created by this requirement has been discussed with the Planning Department, and the Department is unable to agree to your request. This is not a new requirement, but a long standing requirement of the Bozeman Municipal Code. I have also discussed the status of your noxious weed plan with the Weed District. The submittal of a plan to the Weed District on July 25, 2006, does not indicate any issue with the Weed District's timely review of the plan. Also, there was an indication that the plan may not be approvable as submitted. 4. 18.78.060.R: Lighting Plan. The submittal includes a lighting plan for the American Federal Savings Bank site, but does not include the subdivision lighting plan as required by this section. 5. 18.78.080.14: Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72 of this title. As stated in the July 5, ;2006, letter, when you resubmit, you must specifically address where these corrections have been made in the application, and if located within the covenants - list the specific section that addresses each individual omission. 18.72.020.B.2. Common Land/Facilities. The legal description of the common land and a description of common facilities. 18.72.020.B.3. Enforcement. Persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions, responsibilities and payment of assessments, including the City of Bozeman. 18.72.020.B.4. Perpetual Reservation. Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property. 18.72.020.B.5.Rijzht to Use. The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility. 18.72.020.B.8. A mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members 18.72.020.B.9. The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association 18.72.020.C. If the property owners association fails to install or maintain improvements according to approved plans, the City may, at its option, complete construction of improvements and/or maintain improvements in compliance with §18.72.040 and Chapter 18.74, BMC. The City's representative, contractors and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work, and the property owners association shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. The City shall bill the property owners association for any costs associated with the installation or maintenance of improvements. 18.72.030.D. The property owners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways, landscaping in street boulevards and/or parks. 18.72.030.E. That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants, and the City Commission. 18.72.040 Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee 6. One binder is incomplete. It appears to be missing the introductory information before Tab A, portions of Tab E, portions of Tab J, and Tabs K and L. I would like to commend you on your submittal of the digital version on CD-ROM. This is the first time I have received a digital version of the entire submittal. This is an item that the City of Bozeman will be requiring with submittals in the near future to expand public access to all submittal information. Thank you for this cutting edge submittal item. Page 2 of 3 The application and submittasterials will be returned to you at *time. Please come by the Planning Department at your earliest convenience to pick up the submittal. When you resubmit these applications, you must specifically address where these corrections have been made in the application, and if located within the covenants - list the specific section that addresses each individual omission. Since this is a very complicated application with numerous submittal requirements, please review it carefully for completeness prior to resubmittal. Please feel free to contact me at 582-2260 if you have any questions regarding the application or the review process in general. Sincerely, 10 . 6� e� Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner Cc: Molly Skorpik, Morrison-Maierle, P.O. Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 Page 3 of 3 e RE: Documentation of fee calculation for PT land,PUD TO: Lanette Windemaker, AICP; Land Use Planning Consultant Andy Epple, Director, City of Bozeman Planning Department CC: Jerry Perkins, Owner/applicant Molly R. Skorpik, PE Design Engineer,Morrison-Maierle, Inc FROM: Thinktank Design Group Inc. Brian T Caldwell, Ma. Architecture;BA. Environmental Design Date: 07/21/06 This letter is intended to document the fee calculation for the application received by your office on the 27 h of June 2006. PT land PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat application was submitted by the Morrison-Maierle, Inc.As determined in a letter prepared by Lanette Windemaker dated July 5t',2006,the calculation for the proper fees for this application were deemed insufficient.After discussions with Planning Director, Assistant Planning Director,three different planning staff members, and contract planner Lanette Windemaker,the consensus for calculating the correct fee was determined. The issue discussed was the portion of the fee that related to amount of future building within this application. At the time of submittal,the only building proposed covered 1.0%of the lot area, or a floor area ratio(FAR) of 10%. Because the remaining 13 lots have an unknown FAR,the basis for fee calculations will be FAR of 20%. This number was determined by studying current applications with the same zoning designation in an area near this project. The study showed the area of leaseable building square footage was 20%of the lot area. The amount of residential units was not calculated because of the lack of comparable B-2 zoned property in the area that mixed residential and commercial properties. The applicant has no intentions in providing residential units as part of this application; therefore no residential fee per unit should be applicable. Based on these conversations and understandings the following information is calculated as follows: • • PUD Preliminary Plan $ 1,000.00 Plus $25.00 per 1000 s.f of leaseable floor area: Fee for each residential unit: NA Fee for Non residential floor areas: 20%(FAR)x 1,776,812 s.f(lot area)=355,362 s.f Future building area (355,362 s.f. / 1000 s.f) x $25 (per thousand)_ $ 8,884.05 Advertising (PUD preliminary Plan) $ 800.00 Overlay district $ 50.00 Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat: $ 1,000.00 $50.00 per lot x 16 lots(14 lots+2 open spaces) $ 800.00 $5 per adjoiner(5 x12 ) $ 60.00 Advertising (Major Sub.preliminary Plan) $ 800.00 Total review fee $13,394.05 Amount paid as part of the June 27t' submittal $ 3,400.00 Total amount due for re submittal: $ 9,994.05 Sincerely, Brian Caldwell Thmlctank Design Group, Inc. We thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal if there is any question regarding any of the information we are always available for assistance. Thinktank Design Group,Inc.-600 N.Wallace Loft 3-Bozeman Mt.59715 . (406)587-3628 office-(406)580-9750 mobile-(406)587-4659 fax w - CAF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 ;••.�„ 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net July 5, 2006 PT Land Jerry Perkins 511 North Wallace Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: Perkins PUD Preliminary Plan/Preliminary Plat Dear Jerry: The above-referenced PUD Preliminary Plan/ Preliminary Plat applications were received on June 27, 2006, and met the application deadline of 5:00 PM on Tuesday, June 27, 2006. They have been assigned to Contract Planner, Lanette Windemaker. The applications were reviewed in accordance with the submittal checklists and Title 18 of the Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). The applications do not contain all of the required information and have been deemed incomplete. The following submittal materials and/or information were not provided or need to be clarified: BASIC APPLICATION 1. Proper Fees and documentation of fee calculation. The check submitted for $3,400 is not sufficient. The portion of the fee for the_$25 per residential unit and/or $25 per 1,000 square feet of leasable nonresidential floor area applies to the entire PUD. PUD Preliminary Plan $1,000 $.1,000 1,000 PLUS $25 per residential unit and/or $25 x ??????????? $25 per 1,000 square feet of leasable nonresidential floor area $25 x ??????????? PLUS $800 for advertising $800 800 PLUS $50 if in an overlay district $50 50 TOTAL Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 PLUS $50 per lot for the first 100 lots $50 x 16 $800 PLUS $25 per lot thereafter $25 x 0 $.0 PLUS $5 per adjoiner $5 x 12 $60 PLUS $400 for advertising $400 $400 TOTAL $2,260 GRAND TOTAL 2. Digital version (JPEG or PDF) on CD-ROM. Be sure to include all graphics of the proposed subdivision, proposed PUD plan and proposed site plan. 3. List and three sets of mailing labels containing the names and addresses of property owners of physically contiguous property and all recorded purchasers under contract for deed. planning • zoning - subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation - housing - grant administration - neighborhood coordination w 4. List and one set of stampeosealed, plain (no return address) #100elopes containing the names and addresses of all other property owners within 200 feet of site. 5. If you wish information regarding these applications sent to applicants or representatives other than PT Land and Morrison-Maierle, that contact information and approval as indicated on page 5 of the subdivision checklist must be provided. 6. Response to Preapplication comments from Planning and Engineering. 7. It appears that PUD relaxations have been requested from the following sections of the BMC. The application must specifically list the sections of the BMC from which you are requesting relaxations. 18.44.080.A General. City standard sidewalks (including a concrete sidewalk section through all private drive approaches) shall be constructed in all developments on all public and private street frontages, except for alleys. The requirements of the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications shall apply. To not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane. 18.44.080.A General. City standard sidewalks (including a concrete sidewalk section through all private drive approaches) shall be constructed in all developments on all public and private street frontages, except for alleys. The requirements of the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications shall apply. To build an 8-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane. 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards. All street improvements shall be designed by and constructed under the supervision of a professional civil engineer, registered in the State of Montana, and shall meet or exceed the right-of-way and construction standards adopted by the City (including but not limited to an adopted transportation plan or specifications manual) and required for the type of street to be constructed. To build North 15`1'Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Street to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard. 18.44.010.A. Relation to Undeveloped Areas. When a proposed development adjoins undeveloped land, and access to the undeveloped land would reasonably pass through the new development, streets within the proposed development shall be arranged to allow the suitable development of the adjoining undeveloped land. Streets within the proposed development shall be constructed to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions, in which case a subdivision variance must be approved by the City Commission. To not extend North 151h (or 14"') Avenue from Tschache Street to the north boundary line at Baxter Lane. 18.44.010.B. Relation to Developed Areas. The developer shall arrange the streets to provide for the continuation of streets between adjacent developed properties when such continuation is necessary for the convenient movement of traffic, effective provision of emergency services and efficient provision of utilities. . To not provide for a continuation of North 15'h (or 14`")Avenue north from Tschache Street to Baxter Lane.. 8. Relaxations have not been requested from the following sections of the BMC. All require relaxations must be requested or the project must comply with the regulations. 18.42.040.B. Block Length. Block length shall not be designed, unless otherwise impractical, to be more than 400 feet in length or less than 300 feet in length. Block lengths can be longer than 400 feet if necessary due to topography, the presence of critical lands, access control, or adjacency to existing parks or open space. In no case shall a block exceed 1,320 feet in length. 18.42.040.C. Block Width. Blocks shall not be less than 200 feet or more than 400 feet in width, except where essential to provide separation of residential development from a traffic arterial or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. 18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. Rights-of-way for pedestrian walks, not less than 10 feet wide, shall be required where deemed necessary to provide circulation or access to parks, Page 2 of 4 n V open space, schools, Wgrounds, shopping centers, transpWon, and other community facilities. In addition, no continuous length of block shall exceed 600 feet without intersecting a street or pedestrian walk. Pedestrian walks shall also be installed at the end of cul-de-sacs where deemed appropriate. 9. The applicant's responses to the Preapplication review comments was not included in Appendix A as described on page 13. PRELIMINARY PLAT 10. 18.78.030.A2: Location, name, width and owner of existing or proposed streets, roads and easements within the proposed subdivision; existing streets, roads and easements within adjacent subdivisions and tracts; and the name of street or road that provides access from the nearest public street or road to the proposed subdivision. 11. 18.78.030.A4: Zoning classification within the proposed subdivision and adiacent to it. 12. 18.78.030.D2: Street location, right-of-way width (south), and name. 13. 18.78.030.D3: Easement location, width and purpose. 14. 18.78.050.H: A noxious weed management and revegetation plan approved by the district for control of noxious weeds shall be submitted with the preliminary plat application. 15. 18.78.060.K: A stormwater management plan shall be submitted with the preliminary plat. 16. 18.78.060.R: Lighting Plan. SITE PLAN 17. 18.78.080.AIc: Name and mailing address of developer and owner. 18. 18.78.080.A1f: A statement signed by the owner of the proposed development of their intent to comply with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any conditions considered necessary by the approval body. If PT Land is the owner of the proposed American Federal Bank this is not necessary. 19. 18.78.080.A2: Location map (on site plan), including area within one-half mile of the site. 20. 18.78.080.137i: Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City. 21. 18.78.080.B71: Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance. 22. 18.78.080.137m: Fences and walls, including typical details. 23. 18.78.080.B8o: Exterior refuse collection areas, including typical details. 24. 18.78.080.B7q: Curb, asphalt section and drive approach construction details. 25. 18.78.080.B8: Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed, and total square footage of each. 26. 18.78.080.10a: Building heights and elevations of -all exterior walls of the building(s) or structure(s). 27. 18.78.080.14: Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72 of this title. 18.72.020.B.2. Common Land/Facilities. The legal description of the common land and a description of common facilities. 18.72.020.B.3. Enforcement. Persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions, responsibilities and payment of assessments, including the City of Bozeman. 18.72.020.B.4. Perpetual Reservation. Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property. Page 3 of 4 18.72.020.13.5.Right to Usc he right of each property or unit ow*o use and enjoyment of any common property or facility. 18.72.020.B.8. A mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members 18.72.020.B.9. The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association 18.72.020.C. If the property owners association fails to install or maintain improvements according to approved plans, the City may, at its option, complete construction of improvements and/or maintain improvements in compliance with §18.72.040 and Chapter 18.74; BMC:. The City's representative, contractors and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work, and the property owners.association shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. The City shall bill the property owners association for any costs associated with the installation or maintenance of improvements. 18.72.030.D. The property owners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways, landscaping in street boulevards and/or parks. 18.72.030.E. That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants, and the City Commission. 18.72.040 Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee LANDSCAPE PLANS 28. 18.78.100.1)11: A description of proposed watering methods. 29. 18.78.1 OO.D 14: Designated snow removal storage areas. 30. 18.78.100.D16: Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for drainage control. The application and submittal materials will be returned to you at this time. Please come by the Planning Department at your earliest convenience to pick up the submittal. When you resubmit these applications, you must specifically address where these corrections have been made in the application, and if located within the covenants - list the specific section that addresses each individual omission. Since this is a very complicated application with numerous submittal requirements, please review it carefully for completeness prior to resubmittal. Please feel free to contact me at 582-2260 if you have any questions regarding the application or the review process in general. Sincerely, Lanette Windemaker, AICP Contract Planner Cc: Molly Skorpik, Morrison-Maierle, P.O. Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 59771-1113 Page 4 of 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Jon Henderson,Bicycle Advisory Board Ross Gammon,Montana Department of Transportation Sandra Straehl,MDOT=Highway Planning Bureau Gary Vodehnal, Gallatin Valley Land Trust Ralph Zimmer,Pedestrian&Traffic Safety Committee FROM: Tara Hastie, Administrative Assistant RE: Perkins MaSub Prel. Plat #P-06057 and Prel. Plan PLID #Z-06230 DATE: September 27, 2006 ****************************************************************************** Attached you will find the variance application for the proposed Major Subdivision referenced above requesting.the subdivision of 47.62 acres into 18 lots for phased commercial development, zoned B-2 (Community Business)District. The property is legally described as Tract 2A of COS 1215F Gallatin County,Montana, and is generally located north of Oak Street, west of North 11 th Avenue, east of North 15'h Avenue, and south of Baxter Lane. Please review the attached information and provide comments to this office no later than Wednesday, October 25, 2006. The proposals will be discussed by the Development Review Committee on Wednesdays, October 11, 18, and 25, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. in the upstairs Conference Room of the Alfred Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street. The Planning Board public meeting on the proposal has been tentatively scheduled for Tuesday,November 21,2006, at 7:00 p.m.,in the 3`d Floor Community Meeting Room at the County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street. The City Commission public meeting for the proposal has been tentatively scheduled for Monday,December 11,2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Community Meeting Room, 3`d Floor at the County Courthouse, 311 West Main Street. You are welcome and encouraged to attend these meetings. Please return all materials as they are needed for packets for Planning Board and Citv Commission. If you are unable to respond in writing by the above deadline or if you have questions or concerns regarding the application, we ask that you contact Contract Planner Lanette Wiidemaker at 586-5266. Thank you for your cooperation. TH/th Attachments CC: PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 N. Wallace Ave.,Bozeman,MT 59715 American Federal Savings Bank, Larry Dreyer,P.O. Box 4999, Helena, MT 59604 Morrison-Maierle, Inc.,Molly Skorpik, 3011 Palmer St.,Missoula,MT 59808 Thinktank,Brian Caldwell, 600 N. Wallace Ave., Bozeman,MT 59715 Dave Hutchinson,P.O. Box 505, Solana Beach, CA 92075 CO OF BOZEMAN 4 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net MEMORANDUM TO: Subdivider FROM: City of Bozeman, Department of Planning & Community: Development RE: List of Affected Public Utilities and Local, State, and Federal Government Agencies DATE: September 28, 2006 Below is a list of affected public utilities and those agencies of local, state, and federal government having a substantial interest in subdivisions, proposed within the City of Bozeman, as identified by the City of Bozeman: • Bozeman Director of Public Safety • Belgrade Rural Fire Department • Bozeman Forestry Department • Rae Rural Fire Department • DNRC —State Lands • Sourdough Rural Fire Department • MDOT— Bozeman Office • Bicycle Advisory Board • MDOT— Helena Office • Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Committee • Gallatin County Road Office • Recreation and Parks Advisory Board • Gallatin County Sheriff's Department • Gallatin Valley Land Trust • Gallatin County Planning Office • Farmers Canal Company • County Environmental Health Department • Wetlands Review Board • Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board • Vivid Natworks - Telecommunications • Fish, Wildlife, and Parks • Other: This memo serves as your written notice that some or all of these public utilities, government agencies or other entities may be contacted, in addition to the Bozeman Development Review Committee (DRC), for comment on your subdivision preliminary plat application. The public utilities, government agencies or other entities must submit their comments within 60 days of the subdivision preliminary plat application being deemed complete, or prior to the public hearing before the City Commission, whichever is sooner. Notification of which public utilities, government agencies or other entities were actually contacted to review your preliminary plat application will be provided to you once the subdivision preliminary plat application is submitted and deemed complete. By providing this memo, the City meets its statutory requirement to comply with the following provision in the Montana Code Annotated: Section 76-3-504(1)(q)(iii) The subdivision regulations adopted under this chapter must, at a minimum, establish a preapplication process that requires a list to be made available to the subdivider of the public utilities, those agencies of local, state, and federal government, and any other entities that may be contacted for comment on the subdivision application and the timeframes that the pubkc utilities, agencies, and other entities are given to respond. planning . zoning • subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration • neighborhood coordination ORIGIN4Lw-6 CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building P hone 406-582-2260 -•• 20 East Olive Street �f fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 D C E v ing@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-123 www.6ozemon.net JUN 2 8 2006 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AP L DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.Name of Project/Development: PT Land Major Subdivision and Planned Unit Development i l CIE W 2.Property Owner Information: JUL 2 8 A!] DEPARTMENT OF PIJ NNING Name: Jerry Perkins E-mail Address: jerry@karststage.coni AND COMMUNITY DEVE BPMENT Mailing Address: 511 N.Wallace Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715-5757 Phone: 406-556-3521 FAX: 406-556-3516 3.Applicant Information: Name: Same as Property Owner E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4.Representative Information: Name: Morrison-Maierle,Inc. E-mail Address: kbelden@m-m.net;mskorpik@m-m.net Mailing Address: 3011 Palmer Street;Missoula,MT 59808 Phone: 406-542-8880 FAX: 406-5424801 5.Legal Description: Tract 2A of COS 1215F 6.Street Address: Bounded by Oak St,N11th Ave,Baxter Ln,N15th Ave and Walton's Stream/Ditch(excludes 1QJ). 7.Project Description: Project is a commercial planned unit development and major subdivision. 8.Zoning Designation(s): B-2 9.Current Land Use(s): Argricultural 10.Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Regional Commercial Pal, [E (C [E � %fAeReview Fee Submitted ❑ [:SE:P 15 2006 --------------------- DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT It.Gross Area: Acres: 47.62 Square Feet 2,074,327 12.Net Area: Acres: 41.37 Square Feet: 1,802077 13.Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? El Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑ Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation ❑✓ Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? 0 Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type (please check all that apply): ❑O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A.Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ✓❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/COA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit 0 T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption ❑H.Preliminary Site Plan/COA ❑W.Annexation ❑� I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑X.Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K.Conditional Use Permit ❑Z.Zoning Variance ❑L.Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment ❑M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal 0 Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate cheddist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than 8t/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. Finally,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. J Applicant's Signature: ZDate: J3 -0 Applicant's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: �� Date: -� Property Owner's Signature: Date: Property Owner's Signature: Date: Page 2 (Development Review Application—Prepared 11123/03') PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST The appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked"No" or"N/A" (not applicable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant A. ❑ Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site 3. A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area B. © 'Manned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan The following infomkation and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yee No N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 81/2-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms El ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and 0 ❑ ❑ directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas 0 ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all 0 ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial Q ❑ ❑ uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the Q ❑ ❑ applicant h. Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria),BMC.The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require,or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character ❑ ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated j. Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption, (e.g., 0 ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycline Page 3 (PUD Checklist—Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04) PUD Preliminary Plan Information,continued Yes No I N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'/z-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and he flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: k. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction 0 ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same,can be expected to begin and be completed,including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan maps and 0 ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 8'/2-by 11-inches or 11-by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included ❑ ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, 0 ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening,fences,walls and other landscaping C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map ❑ ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent 0 ❑ ❑ off-site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including: a. The proposed width 0 ❑ ❑ b. Treatment of curbs and gutters,or other storm water control system if other ❑ ❑ ❑ than curb and gutter is proposed C. Sidewalk systems Q ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the 0 ❑ ❑ City are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following: a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water 0 ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 d❑ ❑ ❑ feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat,subject to ✓❑ ❑ ❑ the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the Q ❑ ❑ discretion of the City Engineer,a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines,and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses.The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 18.78.0501, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ El under question,the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's d❑ ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application Page 4 5�d veld pug alp uo IInot[s ;ou sauuDru;s Am 3o uop:)rt;suoo atp zoj pasn aq ;ou nEgs uzld pug paAmddE aip uo umoi[s words uado •lenozdds usld lsug zo3 uogextldde ae tpim pauimgns aq llEtls`DWq`(aa;uEZEno pue uEld a3ueua;uruW aiTF:)"3 pIIe eazv IIoutmOD)obo•ZL•si ❑ ❑ ❑ uoia:)aS 3o s;uatuazmbaz aip 2ugaaut `a:)Eds uado 3o aauvua;mEut atp zo3 veld!!''d 'g 240 aip Aq panozdde pus o;pauimgns aq;snm`s;uamaeozdmt i[ans 3o not gplsui atp zo3 2utpteoid uuo3 zadozd m;uautaaT& s;uamaeozdun pa;iwaxa ue puu`s;uamanozdun :)ggnd iaipo pus s;uamanozdun ;aaz;s `za;em `zamas zo3 saogemgmads pus ❑ ❑ ❑ stiEld Suuaauu9ua`33s;s 2IQK PUU :)2IQ aip °;ueld letig aip 3o uotsstuagns o1 zoud •S s;ntuad 3IuTpnq 3o muenssi azojaq paztnbaz aq llEt[s ;eld uotsintpgns pug aip 3o leeozdde 64t:) •algeatldde uagm usld;uamdolanap ❑ ❑ ❑ ;tun paune[d leap atp dusdtaoaas ;snot a;ts atp 30;eld uoisietpgns pug lstag}o UV v DYig`($uideasp-q)Rb•si za;degD 3o suoisteozd aip apaszadns llegs lenozddE urld 6zeutu qwd atp 3o suota mmi pue suoi;ipuo7 pa;e;s Arm ;Etp ;daaxa `:)Wq `@uII dEJspuut ia;dei[D atp tpim ;ua;sisuoa aq osp llst[s ;f •pautmgns aq llegs ueld 6zeutmi[azd paeozdde ❑ ❑ ❑ atp 3o suot;auasas pue saotpTuo:) atp tptm ;aa;sisum IIeld adeaspuel pug g £ ueld a;is atp uo ❑ ❑ ❑ tpzo3;as sr suopou4saz puE suopT IIO�30 a�tte;da»E 3o uoi;EJgt;Ia3 s�iaumo a usld 6seutun[asd atp tptm aausuuojuoa ❑ ❑ ❑ s;t put: ueld arts alp 30 leeozdde 3o uopi.agpsaa To;aa-H ci 2unmid •p ❑ El ❑ dtgszau&o 3o uot;eaggza:)S Jaumo so s�amouv •1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ;eld uoistnipgns sad se Sem 3o-s;g2p atjgnd`s;uataasea`sautl;o7 q (Held a;ts 6sEaitm[azd atp uo pannbaz se uoilmao3m ataes)a;ep asn pue7 e :uoReuuo3tn$IIinol[o3 atp mogs llst[s usld arts usld pug ails, •sueld pug zo3 pautuuad aq hugs sueld 6zsuimilazd atp zo3 pa;;imzad salsas atp Aluo `zaeamopj -geld pug atp 3o aleas atp lenbe o; paanpaz zo pa&p; uaaq set[ ;etp pauimgns aq llet[s ueld 6zemmgazd paeozdds atp 3o Adoo s`pazinbaz zo pa;sanbaz si alsas;uazapip a 31 weld dtsutun[azd paeozdde atp se aleas awes aip ;e (s);aags t[-aut-gC Aq -bZ a uo pa;;tmgns aq llst[s ueld arts usld pug V Z ;uamdolanap ;iun pauuEld aip 3o uaumo zo s;usotldde iatpp se paelonut IIoTaezodzoD alp ❑ ❑ ❑ 3o szo;aaztp PUB sza3g3o zo/pus szattued pa;ituil pus lezatta$lle 3o sataeII 30 ;stl y ti VAN ON sax uolpeuuo;ul Uvid[gal Qfld :pautiugns aq llei[s�spuouetuzo3u[�ittmol[o;au L luau [etn3—�uauz la Q to p u ld D SITE PLAN CHECKLIST These checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal, Any item checked"No"or"N/A"(not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant A. Deli m Review Board 02Ul Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following. Design Review Board(DRB)Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1. 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ 0 2. 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or ❑ 0 industrial space 3• More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses, ❑ Q permitted service commercial uses,permitted industrial uses or permitted combinations of uses 4. 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ ❑ 5. Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ 0 B. General Information The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1. Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) 0 ❑ ❑ 3• A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will ❑ ❑ 0 travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4. Boundary line of property with dimensions 0 ❑ ❑ 5• Date of plan preparation and changes 0 ❑ ❑ 6. North point indicator 0 ❑ ❑ 7. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 8. Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 9• Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio, FAR), Q ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcels)and total site,and square footage for the following: a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures ✓❑ ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking 0 ❑ ❑ C. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, ❑ ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d. Public street right-of-way ❑ ❑ 11. Total number,type and density per type of dwelling units,and total net and gross residential ❑ ❑ 0 density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities,including circulation aisles, access drives,bicycle racks, 0 ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of employee and non-employee panting spaces,existing and proposed, and total square footage of each Page 3 (Site Plan Checldist—Prepared 12/05/03-0 revised 9/22/04) General Information,continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless 0 ❑ ❑ such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the Q ❑ ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot Q ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities d❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑ ❑ ❑✓ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan Q ❑ ❑ complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC 0 ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data,onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: i Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the Planning 0 ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street rights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet,except for sites adjacent to ❑ ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way Q ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points 0 ❑ ❑ 5. Traffic flow on-site ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site 0 ❑ ❑ 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric 0 ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas d❑ ❑ ❑ C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ✓❑ ❑ ❑ d. Water 0 ❑ ❑ e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: A. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches El ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands 0 ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ Q identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplam delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman ❑ ❑ 0 Floodplain Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Q Page 4 {' Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water 0 ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) 0 ❑ ❑ b. The downstream conditions(developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions 0 ❑ ❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑ ❑ 0 topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details 0 ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, 0 ❑ ❑ parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ Q 15. Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review 0 ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 18.52,BMC(Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details Q ❑ ❑ 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas(both 0 ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.060.R,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previously provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ 0 19. Landscaping-detailed plan showing plantings,equipment,and other appropriate information 0 ❑ ❑ as required in Section 18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required,complete section C below 20. Unique natural features,significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees ❑ ❑ 0 and shrubs having a diameter greater than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas 0 ❑ ❑ 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Bozeman Area Zoning ❑ ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site 0 ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑ ❑ ❑ structures or districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑ ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the 0 ❑ ❑ property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 5 �! Landscape Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and the 0 ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys,utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description 0 ❑ ❑ 5. Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated 0 ❑ ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips,including watercourse buffer Q ❑ ❑ strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, d❑ ❑ ❑ including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights,spread and spacing.The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking d❑ ❑ ❑ and loading areas,including information as to the amount(in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ ❑ d❑ damage during construction 10. Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water ❑ ❑ ❑ features 11. A description of proposed watering methods 0 ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) 0 1 ❑ ❑ 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan — see Section 18.48.060, 3MC (Landscape 0 ❑ ❑ Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas Q ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for 0 ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity 0 ❑ ❑ 19. Areas to be irrigated ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 18.42.100,BMC(Watercourse Setbacks),if Q ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not ❑ ❑ ❑ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 KARST STAF.O. INC . 511 North Wallace • 1127 Bozeman, MT 597711-1127 Telephone(406)556-35CO • 1-800-845-2778 Fax(406)556-3501 • email:charter@kars:stage.com tiOTHER LOCATIONS,.- �, � _X . - -•`_ Anaconda • Belgrade • West Yellowstone DECCEWE JUN 2 8 2006 DEPARTPAEN-OF PLANNING AND COMMUNI-Y DEVELOPMENT 01 Pa 0 G 3 .S-2.,� "History is our Heritage . . . Service is our Pride." ENGINEERS ( M0FM N SURVEYORS _J PLANNERS SCIENTISTS MMERLE, INC. 3011 PALMER STREET•MIS,CIlLa,MT 59808.40E.-542-888Q•FA:(406-541-O009 An Employae-Omred Company September 14, 2006 Lanette Windemaker Contract Planner City of Bozeman 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: PT Land Preliminary Plat/Planned Unit Development Application Dear Lanette, Please accept 28 copies of the PT Land Preliminary Plat/Planned Unit Development application package with supplemental information. Also incl'Lided in the body :of :his letter are responses to Planning comments stated in the City letter dated Augus9. 8, 2006. Each of City Planning comments are stated with responses immediately following in italics. 1. It appears that PUD relaxations have been requested from tie following sections of the BMC. Please review these relaxations carefully to ensue that ,.hey are ccr�e:,tly described. For clarification, the relaxation requests have been re-organized in a document located in Appendix A of the application birder. Please rote that relaxation request of BMC 18.44.010 Relation to Undeveloped Areas is not requested, however, a relaxation of BMC ►8.44.010 Relation to Developed Areas is requested. 2. All require relaxations must be requested or the project must comply with the regulations. The "Response to PreApplication Comments" 'indicates that you --rill be requesting a relaxation to Section 18.42.100.B.3.c Watercourse Setback, but this relaxation has not been `ormally requested. Please clarify this issue. The Watercourse Setback relaxation is ;ormally requested in the document located in Appendix A of the application binder. 3. 18.78.050.H: A noxious weed management and revegeta'.on plan approved by the district for control of noxious weeds shall be submitted %Kith the preliminary plat application. Your request of undue hardship created by this requiremert has been discussed with the Planning Department, and the Department is unable to agree to your req.jest. This is not a new requirement, but a long standing requirement of the Bozeman Municipal Code. I have also discussed the status 1 "Providing resources in Partnership with clients tc achieve their goals" MORRISON [AL MERLE,INC of your noxious weed plan with the Weed District. The submittal of a plan to the Weed District on July 25, 2006, does not indicate any issue with the Weed District's timely review of the plan. Also, there was an indication that the plan may not be approvable as submitted. The Weed Management Plan ,located in Appendix E of the submittal binder, was approved on September 7 by the Weed District.. 4. 18.78.060.R: Lighting Plan. The submittal includes a lighting plan for the American Federal Savings Bank site, but does not include the subdivision lighting plan as required by this section. A subdivision Lighting Plan is located in Appendix J of the submittal binder. 5. 18.78.080.14: Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72 of this title. As stated in the July 5, 2006, letter, when you resubmit, you must specifically address where these corrections have been made in the application, and if located within the covenants - list the specific section that addresses each individual omission. Attached to this letter is a copy of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for PT Land Subdivision with "tracked changes" turned on for your review. Appendix H contains clean copies of the document. Following is a point-by-point narration of the changes made by PT Land. 18.72.020.B.2. Common Land/Facilities. The legal description of the common land and a description of common facilities. Legal description of the "Common Areas." Updates were made to the legal description of the property contained in Exhibit A. In addition, the term "Common Area" in Section 1.07 of the declaration was amended to to provide that "'Common Area"means Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat which are shown on the Plat as open space, the green space areas along Oak Street and Baxter Lane which are shown on the Plat, and the street rights-of-way which are dedicated to the public by the Plat. 18.72.020.B.3. Enforcement. Persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions, responsibilities and payment of assessments, including the City of Bozeman. Enforcement of the Declaration. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.3 requires that the declaration establish the "Persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions, responsibilities and payment of assessmenrs, including the City of Bozeman." The enforcement provisions were included in Section 10.03 of the Declaration, which was entitled "Legal Action." To make this provision easier to find, the name was changed "Enforcement of this Declaration,"and minor clarifications to 2 MORRISON LI MAIERLE,INC. the section were made. Article Vlll already contains detailed provisions concerning the enforcement of assessments levied by the Association. 18.72.020.B.4. Perpetual Reservation. Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property. Perpetual reservation of the Common Areas. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.4 requires that the declaration provide for the "Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.5 requires that the declaration provide for "The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.9 requires that the declaration provide for "The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association,"BMC Section 18.72.040.A requires that "If the common areas are deeded to a property owners association, the applicant shall record the proposed documents governing the association at the time of final plat filing," and BMC Section 18.72.040.A.3 requires that "Open space restrictions must be permanent and not for period of years." Anew Section 2.05 was added to the declaration which provides that "Upon the filing of the Plat, Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space parcels, will be transferred by the Developer to the Association. The Association will own and preserve the open space parcels as open space in perpetuity, and the open space parcels will be available for the use and enjoyment of the Owners. The green space areas shown along Oak Street and Baxter Lane on the Plat will be owned by the Owners of the Lots in which the green space areas are located, but the green space areas are dedicated in perpetuity for use as landscaped open space and walkways, and no buildings, parking lots, or other improvements may be constructed in the green space areas without the prior written consent of the Association." The plat itself will dedicate the street rights-of-way to the public. 18.72.020.13.5.Right to Use. The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility. Right to Use. See No 3 Perpetual Reservation of the Common Areas above. 18.72.020.B.8. A mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members Dispute resolution mechanism. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.8 requires that the declaration provide 'A mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members." We have added language to Section 10.03 which provides for efforts to resolve disputes through mediation before filing a lawsuit. 18.72.020.13.9. The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association 3 MORRISON -A-AJ IERLE,INC. Perpetual reservation of the Common Areas. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.4 requires that the declaration provide for the "Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.5 requires that the declaration provide for "The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.9 requires that the declaration provide for "The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association,"BMC Section 18.72.040.A requires that "If the common areas are deeded to a property owners association, the applicant shall record the proposed documents governing the association at the time of final plat filing," and BMC Section 18.72.040.A.3 requires that "Open space restrictions must be permanent and not for period of years." We added a new Section 2.05 to the declaration which provides that "Upon the filing of the Plat, Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space parcels, will be transferred by the Developer to the Association. The Association will own and preserve the open space parcels as open space in perpetuity, and the open space parcels will be available for the use and enjoyment of the Owners. The green space areas shown along Oak Street and Baxter Lane on the Plat will be owned by the Owners of the Lots in which the green space areas are located, but the green space areas are dedicated in perpetuity for use as landscaped open space and walkways, and no buildings, parking lots, or other improvements may be constructed in the green space areas without the prior written consent of the Association." The plat itself will dedicate the street rights-of-way to the public. 18.72.020.C. If the property owners association fails to install or maintain improvements according to approved plans, the City may, at its option, complete construction of improvements and/or maintain improvements in compliance with §18.72.040 and Chapter 18.74, BMC. The City's representative, contractors and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work, and the property owners association shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. The City shall bill the property owners association for any costs associated with the installation or maintenance of improvements. Construction of improvements by the City. BMC Section 18.72.020.C provides that if the association fails to install or maintain improvements, the city can do so and bill the association. We added language which follows this provision as Sections 6.01(c) and 8.06 of the declaration. 1.8.72.030.D. The property owners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways, landscaping in street boulevards and/or parks. Maintenance of streets. BMC Section 18.72.030.D requires that "The property owners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways, landscaping in street 4 MORRISON MAIERLE,INC, boulevards and/or parks." Sections 6.01-6.04 and Section 6.06 of the Declaration already provide for the maintenance of Common Areas. 18.72.030.E. That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants, and the City Commission. Amendments which must be approved by the City Commission. BMC Section 18.72.030.E provides that the City can require that declarations provide "That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants, and the City Commission." We added this requirement to the declaration as Section 9.02. After the subdivision receives preliminary plat approval, any provisions required by the City can be specified in this section. 18.72.040 Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee Common area and facility maintenance plan. BMC Section 18.72.040.A requires the declaration to contain various requirements. The declaration already satisfies all of these requirements. Common area and facility maintenance guaranty. BMC Section 18.72.040.B requires the declaration to permit the City to place a lien on lots in the subdivision if the association fails to maintain common area improvements, and the City performs the maintenance. We added a new Section 8.06 to the declaration which complies with those requirements. One binder is incomplete. It appears to be missing the introductory information before Tab A, portions of Tab E, portions of Tab J, and Tabs K and L. The referenced binder is an extra copy and has been omitted from this package. The applicant and Morrison-Maierle looks forward to City Planning input. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. oily kor ik, Projec Manager 5 MORMON 1 U A MMERLE,INC. Enclosures; 28 Preliminary Plat/PUD ,application Binders CD of Application cc: Jerry Perkins, Land Owner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI 6 DISC 1 i 2007 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT \ - - - - - - - - COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE IQUANTI - - - I SCIENTIFIC NAME I SIZE SIZE \\ - coYRAasm wasBAne _ - T r - SYMBOLS PATMORE GREEN ASH wiJ Uf"-2' 0'-60' 80 RAXINUS PE YLVA IC 'P T ORE' � � OO ' CLASS I GRAVEL FINES TRAIL colaAean mlBanADe �® (ACER XFREEMANII JEFFERSRED') 11/u°-2° 40'-50' 49 O � LOCATED IN ZONE 2 OF WATERCOURSE SETBACK i� NORWAY MAPLE + _ - wfg+ CER P 91 I Li CLASS I CONCRETE TRAIL Other species may be used with approval of City of Bozeman Forester J t. Gass II rwAs s4A1 ff A Ielunl a n TEN¢N annA LOCATED ALONG NORTH SIDE OF TSCWICHE LANE OUAKINC ASPEN z z txAE BED ulm BE E>ewAtm a also.aw,caa m osrAmxon a win la w POPULUS TREMULOIDES 2-3'SDLG 40'-50 34 OMM UN CHOKECHER Y raw ua sAAu BE enuua x rw cues ra nRn o Ixw un swL a[a sH•Rao PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 4-5'SDLG 25'-30 27 - c mwACTm,.wo txw s/ew nw uvas cRAva(wrvRLL no.).ix NrEs uua rm ix6[ mum�orTMe ars'rraleaEuiAaaµoieiso oN�Buxs run az cans m roR b�. U OLDEN WILLQW 2-3'SOLG 60'-70 22 C rr noa s ra wrvax xx¢rwn ua oo¢Air car x aril aAv oR I. —I m wsr suwom A Yralw a It.earns SALIX ALGA VtFELL1NA' C mloEi aoanoxLL NNEOR 4usr x laao w xTEeamE 9lE melaw woou:ls u[ RED TWIG DOGWOOD 12-18' E Asz BUT LAN BE AA ED m ne arc a IAQEWX Buaa Ea1BOM. L a or u——BE A uxiw4 or la mr rnm A 4u.cRoss sale ¢`LY CORNVS SERIC 3'X6' 88 BABL i "Asr B �c m oRcxx szskE uoxc Bow mas win aaa sa<a y swu mrsisr a A ux[nR1 or 3 IxcllEs ar anls�m ama. O SKATOON SERVICEBERRY - 4'-5' 137 0 oRE tIYN sx m RRLNDE mn wxaa oawAwT. IxasAam m esx a mx Bwsa u xmaem er ussm nR. - AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA SOL.G a nVE NIX MUST BE Mom Mr wn CWPlLTm wtEB INmw K YABna IG A.m Si A OaxCRDF Swll ff A YNBIIIY a R NaR2 Or M10m RkINFwam win IS RR —--... LPO55 SLOPE(i YO6TURE fa111M n NOr ABNWR iCa LOIRILTNA aVFA SHWm ff Nam O •••+ - rRaR m RowAn wn mviaalay w.m a nffn 4ERl - W W W `l1 W a MMIE 4 WYRE 1arW11 RaaiS.SIaE a iRV.swm xn(aDEm ILI. - + - IFwwN AaOx3.90R W TA4L 90IM10 Ile nBtID 121 wM A C O55 SIWE Ia J• W W I W W r`J \ _ ORwaR nuN 2.1(.). IN4 ABF son Ra Acc¢9euw - v T. nwammaeumn rAnws xo/oRwaAnoxsw aR[uumlumaay. NOTE, CITY STANDARD 5 FT. CONCRETE WALK wamAClro Bans,oLE m 1R4L maTRucnolL swi txAtm ANo oanRaRm mR A r• Brae' a 4 Y a I Bus wTw 1RNL SFLBNI K(aaam,x W •Y ••,,, � LOCATED ALONG s0U1H 510E BAIETER LANE 5=' W W [rE4wW11PIlIe. 94RL BE Ba Ea PLaHIRNA AN,RXE TRAMS Ale tat'mR g LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES: /y Ir 1. All discrepancies between plan and written specifications shall be reported to Landscape W W/ W _v- �� - "•'� '� - �wur_ Architect immediately. Plan provides all quantities for bidding purposes and shall prevail. ZONE 1 9 \ B•xx 2. Plant sizes shall meet or exceed standards set by the American Nursery and Landscape F Association. 3. Lawn Areas: All areas disturbed during construction shall be reclaimed using the native `O`. mi .. x. As lots are developed lawn areas will be installed using a bluegrass lawn mix and + - - - irrigated. W W W W W W _ CaNPN:nII SUWRApE >•J - Lawn seed mix shall be as follows Common Kentucky Bluegrass 267 �, m <yq� CLASS I ASPHALT TRAIL Newport Kentucky Bluegrass 277 '���'•..,,, .. v, �, _N• �, W m Park Kentucky Bluegrass. 27% wYrrnuuu\\\gib` tJ LOCATED ALONG OAK STREET rRONTAGE.LOT 1.BLOCK I Perennial Ryegross 12% Creeping Red Fescue BX Rate=4#/1000 sq.ft. . I. anss I TRA.ulsr swam A YNluuu ar ILsm coulos. 6. Zone 1 -Wetland seeding: Bottom of detention pond and any areas disturbed by trail $) r. xmx a Taut sww,eE A uNouuar m rEnA nx sLaRE a zs construction shall be seeded as follows(both Zone 1 and 2): W W W W W + al uAx v um A I fcar woE BawxA wW aCE Western Wheatgrass 50% W W W •Y W W W S 1R4L BD SN41 ff_,EA_pPM a I13 NaiS. Stre - ^, ♦ - A A saL saulun.Asc w w[mr a wzoux ciArs asnx,sIwIL ff Rate=ank Wheatgrass 50% m muL BED cwoR m axsaucnox _ Role=2j/ 1000 sq.fL /W WY WL W W - W W, W - a 11wL ffa SHALL WxRET a A uN YUY a N NC16 a CalNm CRa4 CaIRAalm m on ar ua IEREIIY u .—.A.-- It m A mA uxuss anaTRSE ocuao Wetland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 37,or September 15 to sue soL TYPE Yaww9 sent 9 P Y P + November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes grouter than 3 to 1 . rmAr swL cast a v waEs ar AwvLr co4cv.Tm m mx Ei KAx ffTwuu[n W Asm ma. shall be hydromulched. - I. Ea131e1 B Be,SNIll BE,wxum AT AS CAlla!/mwAE wfa Alw _osruunox 7. Zone 2-Native Upland seeding: Any areas disturbed by construction that are not 4yI� o specified as lawn shall be restored by seeding to o dryland mix as follows: - W Slender Wheatgrass 25% Western Wheat Toss 45% aAOi O _ •Y W W W W .e .e 4� \ Thickspike Wheatgross 15% ©PEN SIPACAE Sheep Fescue 157 Rate=2#/1000 sq.ft. . W W .E• tyK� �y W W W V- ✓r W W N. ryland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or September 15 to ♦ ♦ W W W Zy 4.Y'/34 S9'I t .L. .L• .I. :L- .I. .1. \u` 4� \ + November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 [�] Shall be h dromulched / Y W W W �. •4 r• N. .B m W - _ W �, 8. Prior to layout of plantings and beds contractor will have utilities located. No trees W W W W W v, W - .e W u- .L• + shall be located closer than 10 feet from sewer or water lines. Landscape Architect shall ♦ - / approve entire layout prior to installation. ft® N ) - _ 9. Refer to Sheet SW-2 of the PT Land Phase 1 Construction set for Detention Pond 1l plantings. Coordinate these plantings with wetland setback plantings. W W W W W W W v, W \ + �� W W W .I. W W W / - m 10. Improvement Schedule: Refer to Table 1 Phasing Schedule in PUD text. Plantings in ~ M 0 A \ Open Space Lot 1 will be.installed in either Phase 2 or 3,whichever is first. Open Space a r-I Lot 2 plantings and southern detention pond will be installed in Phase 1,the northern n detention pond will be installed with Phase S. Plantings in Open Space Lot 3 will be installed with Phase 1. - -` lD O .r V W W W W W W Y LOT I 480,687 sq.ft. E X Co 11.04 acres tKLL,- W V- W •Y - O In to E W W W. W W I / /�� W W y W I W •Y \\ Q) �D /� NA .y W W W V J. W •Y W W W O O O OP01 EI\ �.75 Air sW \` W W W !$ yr W W W LL• •' ILL ZS a 1 as S �o W o ► / W v Scale I''-60'-0" C� C B rm WV armBox axw - w Large Sitting Boulders GRAPHIC SCALE r�N Large S1I ng u ever w Exw w Exw w arm- Bxw w w I Izo Ba o es _Exw sxw MEN W W t IN FEET) i inch= 80 ft. J Berm C f 00 Ln <r C G fa 4 4 W W W W / E CU W W' W ,�N, ? / OPO O. W W1 1 ✓�77 6 .f l.W W _ W W W W W W W .I/. / /, -5 n I N 4 C � W W 2.7� car sW W ZONE 1 �� W � W W W �v � / ,- . � � Q OW W W W W W - S W W W W •Y W W 1 W W + W W W W W W v 5cale I' -50'-O" B rm `W W W W W I Scale I"=30'-0" Large Sitting Boulders I I / W W W W W W W W W W W W / IXw IXw W - -W W W W W W W W IXw IXW r W W W W W W / SYMBOLS COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES ` SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE OLORADO PRUCE W-10' 60'-70 4 �C 00 I �PICEA PUNGENS) SYMBOLS COMMON NAME PLANTING M Q ES q W W W w w W r3] SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE N N A L 2-2X" 60'-70 2 OLORADO SPRUCE 8'-�0' 60'-70 0 �C W W W W OPEN SPACE ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON' 2 " 25-30 5 PICEA PUNGENS) �, - ( a �v ANADA RED CHERRY 24 �34 S Tt C PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED' 2-Yz �F (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON') 2-%" 60'-70' 3 * ,� ,� W W W W 11 W q' / Q MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 5 ANADA RED CHERRY W W W W W •7Z (] re C PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED' 2 zY2" 25'-30' 6 * / Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. Q MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 5 W W W W W ws W A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be W W W W W W I planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. 1� Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall beCV + W W W W v W p / Landscape Points: Required=15 planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. ` W W W W W W W Provided: 15 Total z 0" W W W W W W W O f I 5 South Yard(dispersed around detention as per city request) n Landscape Points: Required=15 N 5 Boulders z Provided: 15 Total ' W W W W W 0 / 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) 5 South Yard 1 W W W W W W W W W W W as. i i cw O M 5 Boulders I 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) 00 W W W W W I O CD 1 W W W W / W W W W SYMBOLS COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE. QUANTITIES SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE r W W W W COLORADONG5 E 8'jj0' 60'-70 4 (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON') 2-2Nz" 60'-70' 2 * S ANADA RED CHERRY W W W W C PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED' 2 %' 25'-30' S MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 5 � W z� mks W I Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. o o v, ' O / A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be a W W 61 planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. W W I N Landscape Points: Required=15 W / Scale I"�50'-O" Provided: 15 Total 5 South Yard(dispersed around detention as per city request) 0 W [✓ 5 Boulders ' erm 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) ' FJW IXW IXW pkW „� EXW .. I OUt(IBrs.. .sxw olw Exw-. — --I COMMON NAME-._ -- "f exw— .xw----mow- --Exw- '• �SYMBOIS _ - MATURE ANTI' TING ATUR QUANTITIES- yrlp SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE iv! PATMORE GREEN ASH S HAC E LA IW RAXINUS PENNSYLVANI A ' TMORE' i)�•-2• 0'-60' 80 (ACER X FREEMANII JEFFERSRED') 1%"-2 40'-50' 49 �. ex w La NORWAY MAPLE n 0 w LAGER l "-�"..' 40'-50' 91 V W': Other species may be,used with approval.of City of Bozeman Forester. - - P P - .� W .. QUAKING ASPEN .1• w OPULUS TREMULOIDES 2-3'SDLG 40'-50 34 0 2 LOT 3 1_ PRUNGO US VIRGIINIANA Y 4-5'SOLD 25-30 27 O �• q' LOT 4 - - - ES LDEN WILLQW 2-3'SDLG 60'-70 22 P& 0 C 52,172 Sq•ft. LOT 5 EOD T ALGA VITELLINA' 1.20 acres .61.,609 sq.ft. w+ LOT 6' F RED TWIG DOGWOOD - 12-18 3'X6' 88 W - ¢® CORNUS SERICEA F- 51,850 sq.ft. _ -1.41 acres 71.,151 Sq.ft. .. U - AME TOOK SEALNIFOLA Y. SDLG 4'-5'. 137 r. 1.19 acres \ 1.63 acres Q S 'eli ��, B-2 �,�`� q o 1 I O m W RYDER ROAD ; CL M v L T1 !+•.. 38,4 6 sq.ft. \ LOT ; �rLANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES: - 0. 8 acres c' 1. All discrepancies between plan and written specifications shall be reported to Landscape ,1.. 44,759._.,,q.ft. ,LOT 3 .LOT Z C -Architect immediately. Plan provides all quantities for.bidding purposes and shall prevail. 1 b3 acres LOT 1 , .61,557 Sq.ft. 51,886 sq.ft. - y _i2.. Plant sizes shall meet.or exceed standards set by the American Nursery and Landscapes \ 1.41 acres 71,321 sq.ft. association., 1.1.9.-acres - 1.64 acres - O - - • " �3. Lawn Areas: All areas disturbed during construction shall be'reclaimed using the native' mix. lots are developed lawn areas will be installed usinga bluegrass lawn mix and I lirrigated� p 9 Lawn seed mix shall be as follows: �xx"�rlrllrrrtdi� Q - Common Kentucky Bluegrass 26% d•� Y I t7 Newport Kentucky Bluegrass 27% ``• s i•i Y •. �� _ w :• - Park Kentucky Bluegrass 27%: b• j�p 2 —• E �,—._p exw— - Q Perennial Ryegrass 12% Creeping Red Fescue 8% �'• H � Rate=4#/ 1000 s ft. • 3 — . . — . . — PAT RICK ST E%w — q• BEET 6. Zone 1 -Wetland seeding: Bottom of detention pond.and any areas disturbed by trail £ construction shall be seeded as follows(both Zone i and 2): -- 1. Western Wheatgross 50%'. • • j Streambank Wheotgross 50% LOT �'... Rate=2#/1000 sq.ft. - 4 " — LOT 3 ;Wetland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or September 15 to 37,149 sq.ft. I F November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 36,982 sq.ft. shall be hydromulched. 0.85 acres 0.85 acres 7. Zone 2-Native Upland seeding: Any areas disturbed by construction that are not "$ I specified as lawn shall be restored by seeding to a dryland mix as follows:. �q. • tS $ - Slender Wheatgross 25% ir^ul `. `.. ,- Western l4hoa4grane d5S I i Thickspike Wheatgross 15% ttsq. I I Sheep Fescue 157. Rate=2#/1000 sq,ft. .0 � iDryland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or.September 15 to � allows. i 'November 1 as weather a Soils shall not be frozen. Slo es realer than 3 to L• G' N P 9 R - F' - Q shall be nydromulched. C+ f 8. Prior to layout of plantings and beds contractor will have utilities located. No trees Mfg LOT.2. {x -shalt be located closer than 10 feet from sewer or water lines. Landscape.Architect shall I I LOT 5. ; _ approve.entire layout prior to installation. F 38;801 sq.ft. 38,558 sq.ft. tf 0.89 acres q - - I �9. Refer to Sheet SW-2-of the PT Land Phase 1 Construction set for Detention Pond 8 0.89 acres 7 Q -',plantings. Coordinate_these plantings with wetland setback plantings. I Q Ts I10. Improvement Schedule: Refer to Table 1 Phasing Schedule in PUD text. Plantings 1n1 I ; ': (Open Specs Lot 1 will be installed.in either Phase 2 or 3,whichever is first.. Open Space COLTER DRIVE fat 2 plantings and southern detention pond will be installed in Phase 1,the northern detention pond will be Installed with Phase 5. Plantings in Open Space Lot 3 will be I �3 n M �I pa I .installed with Phase 1. ,--I L[V lD L ; IZI w sw D , Z N CA i r—+ 'w � CD - 1=J11 I I _� o L°arT I I I x, a�m x� w"W� m Ln II ,...www f7t I I Zit m a zl II II c I I \ 3 ►'I Q m , E rn I I I I I-.- - - - �00 I I IDI O f Asphalt frail netall \ O I Q LOT 1 z a_ I 143,241 sq,ft. 1 1 C a > I I lm o 3.29: acres' ,8 - F V 0 , �N) l� — — — I 5cale 1 60'-0" � m w . GRAPHIC SCALE _------------- _ us ws an a,s 1 Iso ao m o -eo mo IN FEET) 1 t inch a e0 it. © O E„� —'- '-"ti ------ COMMOtt NAME' -- PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES SYMBOLS SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE rn PATMORE GREEN ASH - lht-2" 1 0'-60' 80 --�--� w FR NUS PENNSYLVAN 'PATMORE' 00 ®.� (AC ER X FREEMANII L'JEFFERSREDI) 1$"-2" 40'-50' 1 49 O —1 NORWAY MAPLE U'3 40'-50' 91. 01 A ER PLATANOIDES (—�. I Ln Other species may be used with..approval of City of Bozeman Forester + QUAKING ASPEN 4 w PO LUST IDES 2-3'SDLG 40'-50' 34 \ OMMON CHOKECHER Y 4-5'SOLO 25'-30 27 S PRUNUS VIRGINIANA :t.. .✓... �, t'\ \ ale OLDEN WILLOW SAU ALGA VITELLI IA- 2-3'SOLG 60'-70 22 I -P P —J + ¢® RASR OS NERICEI D 12-18 88. N 3 X6 O \ -.t_O ;�AMEATNCOHIEREALNIFOLIAjY. SQI� 4'-5' 137 m y y W n Z ZONE'( °•9 ♦W W W, W \ +. 90 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES: �• W �' �' '� AI discrepan�es between plan an written en specific ons s a e repo a to Landscape Architect immediately.. Plan provides all quantities for bidding purposes and shall prevail. \ 2. Plant sizes shall meet or exceed standards set by the American Nursery and Landscape �J t + A6aaC1at10n. _ W 3. Lawn Areas:,All areas disturbed during g g construction shall be reclaimed the native `„wtttt�tur�r W W• W W - ,. - -.� � ',- '. mix: As lots are developed lawn areas will be Installed using o bluegrass lawn mix and W .W W W W W W \' Irrigated. 0fj Lawn seed mix shall be as follows: s: Common Kentucky Bluegrass 26X •, a� ,� W W W :-•i, W .t• \ Newport Kentucky Bluegrass 275 •. •• .. ' ♦ .t• :W w:. .1. w:: W W. \ \ .. Park Kentucky Bluegrass 27% �4jrrrnnnnaa`` (� Perennial Ryegrass 12% Creeping Red Fescue 8% Rate=4e/1 OOO sq.ft. 6. Zone 1 -Wetland seeding: Bottom of detention pond and any Areas disturbed by trail construction shall be seeded as follows(both Zone 1:and 2): _ Western Wheotgrass 509 W W .W W W e• W W :. W �+ + Streambank Wheotgrass. 50% •v W W w, .v' :.W W,:, W W •r. W \\\ .-. Rate-2$/ 1000 sq.ft. Wetland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or September 15 to W :d :r W .�. W W W < y a•'' W :.,. w'. \\ November 1 as weather.allows. Soils shall not:be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 '• m,, ,,. shall be hydromulched. e ' 7. Zone 2-Native Upland seeding: Any areas disturbed by construction that arc not W "W OPEN SPACE N �W w ,p ,y- ,y ,;p. ,v ,,.\ :specified as lawn shall be restored by seeding to a dryland mix as follows: � i - \ \ _ Slender Wheotgrass - 25% �g + Western Wheotgrass 45% • W y� W W W' W W W W 'W . W2:J4�,,�34 S� �t W `W .t: W w •t, ++ea \ Thickspike Wheotgrass 15% .6,77 atpre Sheep Fescue 15R Rate=2/1 completed et bet m b September W W Novland e bare 1d as weathe shall r allowslete�ilsetshall not ba frozen ween March 15 to M Slo tear reter hen 15 to 3 l0 1 01 shall be hydromulched. - P g W N 8. Prior to layout.of plantings and beds'contractor will have utilities located. No trees ' hall be located closer than 10 feet from sewer or water lines. Landscape Architect shall - - approve entire layout prior to installation. ' Ae� W W \� \ \ 9.'. Refer to Sheet SW-2 of the PT Land Phase 1 Construction set for Detention Pond W >W W W W W N W W W lantings. Coordinate these plantings with wetland setback plantings. 10. Improvement Schedule:. Refer to Table 1 Phasing Schedule In PUD text. .Plantings in \ pen Space Lot 1 will be,installed'in either Phase 2 or 3,whichever is first. .Open Space + , LOT � � , ot.2 plantings and southern detention pond will be installed in Phase 1,the northern 14 ''.•i• W W W W - : - W W W " 'r1 W ,� d :detention pond will be installed with Phase 5. Plantings in Open,Space Lot 3 will be rV to lD 480,687- Sq.ft. W. W W 1 W �' I. installed with Phase 1. �- �O rV 1 1.04 acres �� W .'•Y W I W W N N ..,_._.. ._ __- p .w" O i W W , W W W W W � dW�".•g,I G O@ 00 O W W W W 1 W •Y O 1�" +� t'.n J3 kD •�, 5 O A• W W W W W W[].. W- y Z W 1p.,,..•,�g W W W W O W W1 1-9*/7/-7 is .ft.* ® 1 W W W .y .!• N .W W 2.75 SW J• ' 6 011 -r W W W W W W I Y W V C B rm ♦ I Scale V'-60'-0"VWNv — .— Large Sitting Boulders e ow !AL ou(clers tw— L erm t:,�— _.._ -- --exw--- -exw—._ --e - I Y GRAPHIC SCALE ti ' ry� LA W W W ,xo eo w o. ao ,eo .. 5��• " % IN OL�...: .\\ I - inch=80,ft. Berm Uly 01 CL 00 •`70 A y yDA <EC5 I7W g o // w w 2 a zs C N n w A W W � � � I .I [wi1 (�PENW /Ji E I W: n r Z r ZIn CU 11 -W `A 19,�77 Is ft. 2.7�i :Is Sw W. ��,' ZONE <� `w w w w w. � .v •v w w w w / a ICI � W V, r I ice. o` III Scale 1" 30'-0, ,. Scale I -50I-0 B rm W . I Large Sitting Boulders7L + ♦ ! --COMMON NAM — -- PLANTIN MATURE QUANTITIES- SYMBOLS aw Exw _ SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE e�r, �OLORADO PR CE PICEA PUNGENS) 8�ua0r 60�-70:: 4 SYMBOLS COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES w w w W W W w W SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE W ! W W v v w W ULMUS gAMECANA 'B 2-zyz" 60'-70' 2 * j OLORADU PRUCE 8'-10' 60'-70 0 * W ♦ W v w W W oO / MER RANDON) , PICEA PUNGENS) ,,, N ANADA RED CHERRY NDON AMERICA z w W W w OP -N SPACE N C PRUNUS VIRGINIANA CANADA RED' ' 2-zY2 25'-30' 5 * � " :.•. 60'-70' 3 MOSS ROCK BOULDERS (ULMUS AMERICANA BRANDON') 2- * 10 _ ANADA RED CHERRY w W 2J4 �34 Wsgt. �. PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED' 2-2yz" 25'-30' 6 * � '' .v w W W W� w w•Moss ROCK BOULDERS 5 w W W W I •7 Z a�re Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic spruikler system. W w W W w W : A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be W W W W W W W W planted.closer than 10 feet from an water or sewer line. Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. y A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be Landscape Points: Required= 15 planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. ' N W W w W w Provided: , 15 Total Landscape Points: Required=15 `. W y W W W W W 5 South Yard(dispersed around detention as per city request) 124 Provided: 15 Total W W w W W NO / 5 Boulders 5 South Yard W W W w o 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) 1 "`a rj i-n �,Q 5 Boulders 5 Drought tolerant plants *'1001/6 ! _— , r- 0 f6 1.0 _ W w - .W WCD CL� Cc COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES SYMBOLS SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE W a W COLORADO PRUCE 8-10 60'-70 (PICEA PUNGENS) BRANDON AMERICAN60'-70' 2 (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON' 2-zY2 * j ANADA RED CHERRY 25'-30' 5 - PRU NUS.VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED' 2-2V' `► w w y w MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 5 ♦ .-All Cain ill•• Notes. landscaping g w be watered by an automatic,sprinkler system. A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be ` o / planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. ® ! Landscape Points: Required= 15 W 1 N Provided: 15 Total w w Scale I'!=50'-O". 5 South (dispersed around as per city request) / th Yddi d d detention i l � S Boulders W C / 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) VVVerm C OF BOZEMAN 0 DT ARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana' 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net FINAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: PT Land Major Subdivision and Planned Unit Development 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Jerry Perkins E-mail Address: jerry@karststage.com Mailing Address: 511 N.Wallace Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715-5757 Phone: 406-556-3521 FAX: 406-556-3516 3.Applicant Information: Name: Same as Property Owner E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Legal Description: Tract 2A of COS 1215F 5. Street Address: Bounded by Oak St.,N 11th Ave,Baxter Ln,N 15th Ae and Walton's Stream/Ditch(excludes KN). 6. Project Type: ❑ Site Plan ❑ Site Plan/COA ❑ CUP ❑ CUP/COA ✓❑ PUD ❑ Other: 7. Project Description: Project is a commercial planned unit development and major subdivision 8. For condominiums: Is a digital copy of the layout attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 9.A written narrative addressing how all of the conditions of approval ❑✓ Yes ❑ No and code provisions have been addressed is attached? Certification of Completion and Compliance — I understand the conditions of approval and the submitted final site plan or master site plan have complied with any conditions of approval or corrections to comply with code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Site Plan — I acknowledge that construction-not in compliance with the approved final site plan may r t in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. Applicant's Signat e• Date: ?IQ-07 Applicant's Signatu Date: ropetry Owner's Si a Date:1�lU,� Property Owner's Signature: Date: (Final Site Plan Application—Prepared 12/10/03;revised 01/05/05;re-.ised 01/19/07) r0 PT Land Planned Unit Development Conditions of Approval Criteria Binder August 2007 Revised December 2007 Submitted By: El MORRISON E101MAIERLE,tNc. MFiV1aNee-0wn dConTmry • 0 • PT LAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Correspondence PUD Application PUD Conditions of Approval Response to Conditions Development Guidelines Covenants Final PUD Plan Landscape Plan • 0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— PT LAND PUD PLAN CONDITIONS 0 Condition and Response 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not be allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. See the sign policy in the architectural guidelines. Specifically, the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines begin on Page 44 and ends on Page 50 of the Development Guideline Document with the sign policy is organized into chapters based on Neighborhood Type. Within each respective chapter, Section 1 outlines illumination and coloring sign policy. This information is included in the Development Guidelines Section of this binder. 2. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the freestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services (green), Service Warehouse Neighborhood (red) and Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD, the transitioning of uses, and the residential adjacency. See the sign policy in the architectural guidelines. Specifically, the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines begin on Page 44 and ends on Page 50 of the Development Guideline Document with the sign policy organized into chapters based on Neighborhood Type. Within each respective chapter, Section 2 outlines sign types and restrictions. This information is included in the Development Guidelines Section of this binder. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines, materials, colors, architectural details, etc. The following diagrams and visual examples have been added to further demonstrate the intent of the development • guidelines; Table 1-1, Tables 1-A thru 1-D, 1.1.a, 1.1.b, 1.1.c, 1.1.d ,1.2.a, 1.5a, 1.7.a, 1.8.a, 1.8.b, 1.11.b, 1.12.a, 3.2.b, 3.2.c, 3.3d, 3.2.e. This information is included in the Development Guidelines Tab of this binder. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. The significant difference between the two neighborhoods is accomplished in the building placement policy and the uses defined in tables 1-C & 1-D. Further, the description of both neighborhoods has been refined to better differentiate the neighborhoods. Additional the signage policy differentiates between allowable forms of signage. This information is included in the Development Guidelines Tab of this binder. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5, Block 1 may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 may be located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. The Final PUD Plan illustrates the 1-90 and West Oak Street Entryway Corridors. Lots 1-5, Block 1 are located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor, and Lot 1, Block 4 and Lots 1, 5. and 6, Block 3 are located with the 1-90 entryway corridor. §18.30.030.A. Application of Entryway Corridor Provisions states all development wholly or partially within 660 feet of the centerline of the following roadways: Interstate 90 frontage roads, within the Bozeman City boundaries, whether or not they are designated frontage roads. Baxter Lane is considered a frontage road; therefore, the Entryway Corridor is setback 660 feet from the centerline of Eaxter Lane. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open space lots, Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the Final PUD Plan in accordance with §18.78.100 and §18.48. Completion of the landscaping in the open space lots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds and completed with Phase 5. • A Final Landscape Plans are located in Landscape Plan Section of this binder. Specifically, Sheet L-2 depicts planting for the open space lots located in Block 4. Sheet L3 is included to show the open space lot landscaping. Points are delineated on this sheet and both lots achieve 15 points. Phasing of landscape improvements follows 1 of 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— PT LAND PUD PLAN CONDITIONS # Condition and Response phasing of the overall development as defined in the Phasing Schedule included with this document. 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The Final PUD includes language stating that the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1, Block 4 is required at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. The Final PUD includes language stating that the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 is required at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development, all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060, Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. The Development Guidelines, located in the Development Guidelines Section of this binder, discuss landscape requirements. 10. That the rights to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is recognized that the rights to a use occupancy permit is contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and Oial conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. This response document and supplementary documents included in the application binder serve to address conditions of approval and code provisions. Also included is a signed and filed copy of the Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use Permit document. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final site approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. PT Land Planned Unit Development conditions of approval are consented to in writing and shall be recorded with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to issuance of any building permits, final site approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. A copy of the Owner's Consent document is located after this response document. . 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. The Final PUD Plan complies with standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance. Supplement information demonstrating compliance is located after this response to conditions document. This information includes the list of PUD owners and Conditions of Approval legal document. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of §18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the egn Review Board for review and recommendation. 2of4 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — PT LAND PUD PLAN CONDITIONS • Condition and Response It is recognized that all subsequent Site Plans within the PT Lane Planned Unit Development that meet or exceed the design review thresholds of §18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14 Block 3 shall include a north/south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14`h Avenue to North 15`h Avenue. As a PUD, these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission.) PT Land proposes to construct or have constructed a 27-foot back-of-curb to back=of-curb private drives within a 30- foot foot wide public utility and access easement at the locations shown on the attached exhibit located with this document. The proposal is supported by the following: 1. The condition was applied to the Planned Unit Development which affords it some element of relaxation from subdivision regulations. 2. §18.44.090.B states that access to a lot within a PUD (ie shown on a Final Site Plan) may be met with an approved private street. 3. Further, the street may be constructed to a standard "that has historically provided an adequate level of service to adjacent properties, which level of service would not be degraded as a result of pending development." PT Land believes that the road described above will meet the intended use since it affords a 26-foot wide drive aisle, consistent with parking lot drive aisles and it will be encumbered by a public access easement which will also allow for the installation of utilities. It should also be noted that each lot adjacent to either of the two roads also fronts on a • dedicated public street, clearly then, meeting the access requirements as set for in BMC 18.44.090. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— PT LAND PUD PLAN CODE PROVISIONS # Code Provision and Response a. Per 18.80.1460, this property is not located adjacent to the 1-90 interchange at North 7th Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone. All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. The Development Guidelines are updated to exclude this reference. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planning plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The Final Landscape Plans are located in Landscape Plan Section of this binder. Specifically, Sheet L-2 depicts the watercourse setback plantings. C. Per Section 18.36.090.E, all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zoie may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on • the final plan. Overall, PT Land provides 31.5 open space performance points based solely on Open Space 1, 2 and 3. One and 3of4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL— PT LAND PUD PLAN CODE PROVISIONS # Code Provision and Response one-quarter points are provided for each percent of project area that is provided as publicly accessible open s ce. This includes Open Space 1 and 2 of Block 4. , which provide 30.2 performance points. Open Space 3 of Block 2 provides 1.3 performance points based upon non-accessible open space. The remaining open space, distributed throughout the development, is not accounted because Open Space 1, 2 and 3 meet the obligation required by the UDO. It is anticipated that the actual open space provided for this development will be greater at full development as it is likely that additional areas of each lot will remain in open space. A PUD Open Space Table is provided on the Final PUD Plan. 'd. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and purposed of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19.`h Avenue/West Oak Street ..Corridor Master Plan. The applicant shall -document-the provision of performance, points. A fable showing 'the compared PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. Reference the response to c. above. e. Per 18.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19th Avenue / Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. • At least one-half of the required open space in the West Oak Street entryway corridor is in the form of common open space easements. This corridor incorporates the required landscape for greenway corridors. The final plat submittal identifies the legal instrumentation for said easements. The Landscape Plan for American Federal Savings Bank shows the landscape features for the greenway corridor. f. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies of a Final PUD Plan within one (1) year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. Seven copies of the Final PUD Plan and supplemental documents will be submitted to Planning prior to one year of preliminary approval. Receipt of the preliminary approval conditions are approval was obtained on December 21, 2006. g. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been satisfactorily addressed. This document addresses,*in narrative format, how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been met. The response package includes required applications for Final Plan review and approval. M:\3948\004\Docs\fsite\Response to Conditions of Approval PUD.doc • 4of4 • Phasing. Schedule • Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Patrick Street between North 14th Avenue and North 15th Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 1 Water connection within Patrick Street between North 14th 1 Avenue and North 15th Avenue. Lots 1-5 • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Phase 4 and Phase 5. • Tschache Lane between North 151h Avenue and North 14th Avenue. • North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. • Relocate a portion of Walton's Stream/Ditch. Block 2 . Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 4 Lots 1-4 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. - • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • a • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to southern boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 3 • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 2 3, Block 4. Lots 1-3 • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through Phase 3 and Phase 5. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 141h Avenue and North 11th Avenue. • North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 3 • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 3 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street: Lots 4-5 • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3. 8 • Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 14th Avenue and 5 Block 4 North 11th Avenue. Lots 1-3 . Regional detention facilities. Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 only. i • 9 - � Private Drive Cross-Section i • • • - 1 NORTH SOUTH ^, tO' _. 40' PUBLIC UTILITY & ACCESS EASEMENT Alt( 2R rL 2= ASPHALT I _ 27' WIDTH 4"-1 h* MINUS CRUSHED ROCK - I COMPACTED TO 95% OF ASTM D-698 1' 11.5' DRIVING LANE 11.5' DRIVING LANE 6' 5' SIDEWALK—}— 1' 0.5' BACK OF (� ~ -• CURB (TYP.) f I 5=32 5=37.7 A (4 tT COB STD -\ ��•�� \ v �' 'F~ � �.. .T y�� i/I COB STD CURS & �\ �� \ �, �. ��Y� fc.. a .'.�..n �G� CURB k GUTTER GUTTER COMPACTED SU13GRADE 3' OF ASPHALT 12" OF 6"-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE 9" OF 1 i" TYPE CRUSHED BASE COURSE " f.OMPACTFD Sl18-GRADE SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE ASPHALT TRAIL DETAIL r3_'� COLTER_DRIVE ROAD SECTION 5 NO SCALE S NO SCALE FINAL ASPHALT GRAVEL OR COMPACTED SOIL AS REQUIRED BY OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE ADDITIONAL CONDOR FOR - 9' ONLY TYPICALLY 12' N-12 1.1�•`�.:.'•. `` -':''` DOUBLE WALL CORRUGATED - �� POLYETHYLENE CULVERT OR -L LARGER PER NORTHWESTERN - ENERGY 18� N-12 DOUBLE WALL CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE CULVERT WITH END CAPS 1z iz' 18'..... AND BAND. 48. 3" ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE 6- OF 1-1/2" TYPE A CRUSHED BASE COURSE ,5" OF 6'-MINUS AGGREGATE SUBBASE W/FABRIC r4 UTILITY CONDUIT TRENCH DETAIL COMPACTED SUBGRADE 5 No SCALE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT DETAIL 5 NO SCALE ��11• ���j VERIFY SCALE! REVISIONS --c��ry ArV�ll DRAWN BY: MOS PROJECT NUMBER 1300.516 THESE PRINTS MAY BE NO. IDESCRIPTION DATE BY 3011 Palmer Street = ,9 Irr, CHK'D.BY: MRS AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK REDUCED.LINE BELOW �r Engin Missoula.MT 59808 SHEET NUMBER MEASURESONEINCHON MORRISON M APPR.BY: MONTANA 5 ORIGAAL DRAWING. �i Surveyors - w� MRS BOZE MAN 1 W� DATE 620107 DRAWING NUMBER -----� I LJ MAIERLE INC. Planners Phone:(406 542�880 1 PE 2_ MOD"SCALEACCGRDWGLr. `J A.E�lo n-o..m dCo� Fax(406)542�BOt �,r 1, fo V- as REVIEW DETAILS 5 Y +nNnY rr'4 LENS �!- BY: KSB M11300\S161ACADLSME-Ry1DEfAI SMWG PLOTTED SYWOCON ELL ON NovII W007 COPv GM MORPI NC UERLE.MC.=T ''r�NA��„"'� DATE: 625/07 i PT Land Planned Unit Development Development Guidelines December 2007 s � � PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................1 Architectural Guidelines...................................................................................................3 Landscape Guidelines .............................................:...................................... ...............40 Sign Design Criteria Guidelines.....................................................................................44 i PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Introduction The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that a high quality design is maintained within the development of the PT Land project. This project is presented as a network of neighborhoods that transition and blend intensities of uses: Service Warehouse, Support Services, Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor, and Financial Institutions and Services. Each of these neighborhoods transition between the existing adjoining neighbors and proposed uses. Document Organization This document is organized into four sections: Introduction, Architectural Guidelines, Landscape Guidelines and Sign Guidelines. The table of contents on Page I identifies the location of each section. Site Planning and Phasinq Site Planning and Phasing is described in detail is the Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative for this project. Open Space Allocation Due to its location in the North 19'' Avenue/Oak Street Corridor, this project will be developed as a planned unit development and meet or exceed the respective open space requirements. The PT Land PUD acts as an overall open space plan and schematically depicts a minimum of 30% open space for the entire PUD. A portion of the open space is distributed throughout the PUD to achieve a larger open space corridor along the Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek. It is the intention to demonstrate open space distribution over the entire project rather than 30% open"space per lot. The Site Plan of the PT Land PUD demonstrates the ability to obtain 30% open space via greenway, stream setback and other open space areas. Community Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Pedestrian/bike trails are integrated into the PT Land development and extend into the adjoining neighborhoods to create a loop. With this project, a trail located near the Mandeville Creek will be installed. Sidewalks or trails will be installed adjacent to all public roads. Access • The PT Land PUD is accessed via public roads and one private road. The public roads include Baxter Lane to the north, Oak Street to the south, North 15"' Avenue to the west and North 11�' 1 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Avenue to the east. Tschache Lane, North 14th Avenue and Patrick Street will be extended • within the project. A private road within Lot 1, Block,4 also provides access to the site. Other Requirements Lighting, noise and utility design will comply with the B-2 zone and guidelines set forth by the City of Bozeman. • 2 0 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Architectural Guidelines Introduction The purpose of these guidelines is to provide a dynamic, attractive commercial corridor that reflects thoughtful design standards for four distinct neighborhoods proposed within the property included in this PUD. The objective for these guidelines is to describe the variety of building types and land uses that will create a sense of neighborhood. The differences from one set of design standards to another will create the dynamic and distinct sense of place desired by the city of Bozeman and the citizens who participate in the growth of our commercial districts. The building design standards are specific to the four neighborhood districts created in this PUD. The charter for each neighborhood is described in this guideline. Ideas regarding architecture, building placement, and the materials used to create our built environments are specific to the type of each neighborhood. A map showing the location of each neighborhood is shown in table 1-1. The four neighborhoods uses are listed in tables 1-A, 1-B,1-C,1- D and are included at the back of this document. For a comparison of uses relative to each neighborhood, a composite of permitted uses are shown in table 1-2. Scope These guidelines shall apply to all properties within the project PUD. All properties included in this PUD will be subject to, and required to adhere to the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14t' 2005. These architectural guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14t' 2005. The BDOP is a comprehensive development guideline and should be understood and adhered to when proposing a building within this property. Organization These guidelines address specific design standards to create the four neighborhood districts within this development. They outline the charter of each neighborhood and the building design standards that reinforce the sense of place intended for this development. These guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the City of Bozeman design polices regarding building placement, parking alignment, pedestrian connections, and the green space in and around these neighborhoods. There is no need to reiterate the ideas already required within the City of Bozeman's design policies because the objectives within the BPOP apply to all entryway corridor developments within the city. The policies of the city for neighborhood design, site • design guidelines, and corridor specific design guidelines are clearly described in great detail and are required to be adhered to as closely as possible. 3 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Guideline format and compliance Each guideline topic is presented within a chapter specific to each neighborhood district. The guidelines are presented in four chapters, one for each neighborhood. First, the policy for building design and/or site planning is provided. Secondly, specific guidelines are provided to illustrate how the policies are met. Compliance with this guideline must be achieved by meeting the specific measures described in the PUD guidelines. Further compliance with the formal design concepts policy of the Design Objectives Plan is required. The method of compliance is stated as follows within the BDOP. "In many cases, compliance with a guideline can be achieved by meeting one of the specific measures described in the "bullet" line. In cases where the specific bullets do not apply, the guideline statement itself shall,. and if that also does not apply, then the policy statement shall be used." (Page 6 BDOP.). Review procedure A hard copy of the PT Land PUD guidelines will be provided with each application to the City of Bozeman planning department. As required by the UDO, all site plans shall be reviewed by the • planning staff and reviewed for compliance with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP)adopted February 141h 2005. Guideline modifications and updates This plan intentionally contemplates changes as market demand shapes the future of this property. These guidelines will be revisited for possible adjustments every ten years in conjunction with Bozeman 2020 Community Plan document of the City of Bozeman growth' policy. The direction of any adjustments, if necessary, will come from the majority of property owners within the PT Land PUD. • 4 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • oken 'space t t' lot,1 ,. t 2,blot 3; 'lot 4--.,:Pot:' ` 5 - @t 1 'lot lot 4 ' l — o &- ;..lot 3 � 2 16f 1' A.- lot 3 'lot 4 ` lot 2 J k.5 ` r ® •Sella Nerohom NelghbcAioo9 a HosMalry erW Ro&nai Mohor Neighbor ® •Fkwdal Wifl lone end Service N c .Support Services Neighborhood .¢ 1 -2 5-2 0 0 7 TABLE 1-1 5 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • A Table t-A. Service Warehouse Neighboorhood Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses mUMno serNea P elMillrew0livirt NOMM'pIO P NOTE welitrideatMimefficsi gillsillne;lInikillitillp P listed ltvingfeldenV care facilities utowolfM lrtr aaio v topwr,r doll"d In we tt1M utow ift Perfirp tot or OEW"Ic eryrtroer) P eWWohawR P n s and.other financial instilubms stress.technical or vocationei school ushm mil Community centers Covenience uses enience use restaurant care centers awv ewrlCa7 ssenbal services(Type II) tended-stay-lodgings OOd iRflp3*2 faegen Ietlrlf00detaq wo tether rtntm P edN end exercise esmtYishmens. ospeats: . oteiar motel oboratonee.reeve en wid ft aundry;dry cleaning r dNtrted in ttrie Oil* adynghouses - klloore orhlaly useum • edcel entl Centel clinics, eating liall .-.as,at lrfrW ui nit Ira Omerbuildings and structures typically accessory to permitted usesi au taaeSN Personal and convenience services,as defined in this ude gronmit¢IVO denA ett"es end Makaftirig IISW/wenerdd P Nas club.,fraternity.smorey or lodge - bFc buildrigs sldw'ydriq corwols ultx�olnnre P assurers Nat Dees w>elned ik PNshdoPF NOTE stall,large stele esof alcohol for on-premise consumption. 41 Niw wept f1e7 Wledliv near Sj,,tat ti.at�•i +ores P Veterinary citric 1161isMi4040MV wall`3QWSM"'Net MM;ORM ding It nick t0-..ddnretlW*~11 ie 04 P + P Notes: i-Wh an located on the second or subsequent soar, Mcluding adult businesses,and large scale rest,as they ore defined in Chapter 18.60,BMC. • 6 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • Table 1-B Financial Institutions and Services Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Ambulance service Aointiments and Apartment buildings.-second and subsequent upper floorsony NOTE and entertainment center,as defined in this tole sisted fivinglelderty care facilities odle Nei sales d repair,as defined in this the omobke wesnin estadhhman[ s terminals _m:uniy centers Convenience uses Convenience use restaurant care centers ssenba services(Type 11) Extended.star lodgings cod processingfeN as rozon food sorege and locker rental eahh end exerdse establishments. spiels... . del or motel aundN,dry cleaning fight goods repair,as defined in this title odginghouses anufacturinq,light and comply teN Indoors seum u sem eeon hell Personel and convenience services,es ddined in this title at grooming shop• Ong offices and publishing establshments Mete dub,baonhity,sordry or bdge oseardh laboratories esmurants etalt largescele as of alcohol for on-premhse consumption. ph pant shops(not including now sign fabrication) pholstery,shops eterinary cynic holosale dstnbutors with on-premise retal outlets,providing ehousing is Iknkad to commodities which are sold on die. remises holesale,establishments Nat use samples,but do nd.stock on ramises Notes: I NO on located on the second or subsequent floor, 2Exdudng adult businesses,and large scale total,as they are defined in Chapter 18.80,BMC. • 7 i PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • C Table 1-C Support Services Neighborhood Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Ambulance service parbnorts mdand Apanrnotd Oull®nps;'socori Ynd suEs.pt.rR.uppaflooi't.aNy P NM t Aft rM_ wortYinnont anNr o donMd In this.Bn. P fisted livinyelderly cqM faciities omobiie irel sales'orrepilr;as deined.n this ttle. u�a„moeD.putlnp tar psnQ._(palo a0rh!tol,__"�„ P Automobile washing esteNislvnent Beirks'and other financial Institutions; tress,teclNigal oryocadonal school I teimii als muitty'c"rn P omenoo uxe P memonnuw-itaunrt-irk cint"* P ntilsl:oorvlcss.(Type:l) _ P sormalservices(Type II)'. 5derided,stay lodgings cod processing faciiJos .rezen food stprege end locker reMel 4id th and exeretii astabilihments owitels otal or motet . abomb;rles.*research and diagnostic aundty,dry eloaning _ 'ghi goods repair,as defined In this title -odgnq houses .. - enuecoaing,igM oral tonnpI ly indOcE weurii amain find aniaread�"; r P setng hell - .,is deflhid 16 this Me P _ r buildings snd structures typlcrN actessory to pOMMd us it A. arl ingf Rini!. P, orsomisnd"conveNenee.servlen;is defnod in this title; P et grooming shop ---�— P -- . ming ofices and Wbllsrd estob1sl mans HvstrttuD tistemlly;sorerity orlodgs�Y�_t��_._.. R_�-T,_.1 Ic buildings Ausrsnd recw, no continors ..,eaarch lstaonforlm: atarrante P stay ua..;n detlned Intlfis 9de P NOTE Z 511111ea of alcohol for-"rornist consumption P Bign pairt shops(no!irMuding neon sign fabrication) pholstery shops �1 ., Molesele dlairlbutots-with on•premise retail outlets,prevlding erehousing is limited to commodities wIicri ore sold on the remises Mo6iito Odibishmon4 tusotFiaiimpMe,"bul.do non atoek on`YJ'� - Notes:. 1-Wnenen baled on the second or subsequent floor. 2-Excluding adult businesses,and large scale retail,as they we defined in Chapter 18.80.SMC: 1 0 • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • t7 Table t-D Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Oulance service erbnents and Apabment tuild'n .,second and subs n ent u-a It only NOTE I AV od «fiIMrs crtke sted 1Ning'eldaly,care fadffies ormhobiIs fuel sales a reps,as defined in this title loia iiiiiii,ficiir twilikorOf h P oinoblle washing establishment . ks and other financial institutions sins,technical or vocational schod s tamnas uYYsntkn P w P ter nmA}vrlt P ew eerhtrs P ssendd sernces(Type II) ewbdiiino old processing facilities rozen food storage and locker rental edth and exercise estatishments ospitals or P aboretaies,research and diagnostic sundry,dry dewing fight goods wair.as defined in this boo houm • anuracturing,light and completely Indoors ortualy P edca and dental clinics hag P offices,as defined in this Ode Ow btAlAngsend srnrhses 4*kry eseeswybe pentOW uses A fugue ason l and convenience savices,as dared in this sae et grooming shop mng offices and publishing establishments Note dub,fraternity,s rcZ a lodge tuiNnp VA r"VQft COMMMS esewdh laboratories P aei uses,as defined in this ttk NOTE 2 ter,bw scre P P 'gn pent shops(not'ncludng neon sign fabrication) phdstery,shops eterinary clinic olesale distributors wih on-premise retail outlets,providing aehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the ensses olasole establishments that use samples,but do not stock on erases Notes: T-Wben located on The second or subfecluent flow. 2•Exllydng adult businesses.and large scale retell.as they are defined In Chapter 78.80.BMC. i 9 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 1- Service Warehouse Neighborhood . This district is characterized as having design qualities of an industrial warehouse area. Typical to this neighborhood are big trucks, small signs and simple building forms that highlight the functionality of purpose. Businesses generally do not rely on visibility from arterial streets and have a clientele that would travel to the location regardless of the location in town. This neighborhood has added benefit of adjacency to major arterial streets. The neighborhood should be considered a warehousing distribution and light industrial area. It should be noted that the areas within this development are located adjacent to the large storage areas of the Kenyon Noble site. The visibility from the class I and class II entry way corridors is limited or non existent when build out of all the adjoining land is complete. The design character of this neighborhood is simple building forms. The activities of the businesses are internal and on occasion disrupt traffic for shipments and deliveries. The types of permitted occupancy uses for this neighborhood are shown in table 1-A. 1. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building . fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Buildings should define intersections with a strong building presence. This can be accomplished by proposing second floor building area at the corners of intersecting streets. am i Of Madmy Zed�WaM c,�nea madwn Table 1.LA • 10 0 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines . B. Building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. The specified setback for this neighborhood is 7 feet from front property line. Buildings are allowed to articulate the building envelope for design purposes but in general, 75% of the building envelope shall be located in close proximity to the building front yard setback(s). The additional 10 feet of open space area as shown on the PUD plan for lots within this neighborhood shall be nodes of open space equal to the area of the open space setback for each lot. As an example, lot 3 of block 3 has 4,911 s.f of additional open space required for the PT Land PUD. This area shall be located to crate an active outdoor space appropriate for the uses in this neighborhood. Additional details relating to nodes of open space are covered within the landscape guidelines. 25%of Wk"m s 75%of bu"mw j � I I I T dllawp loatra m a nsr papty stlLtic • � �p'apMy Yne \ `sUaet axD `OWE^ Table 1.13 C. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. Prop°""° \ nod.of open Spam O �. `� road cut&we Table 1.1.0 11 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines D. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on • each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. PMMtY[we Inappropriate tuuaing placement In biA�ng v Meter Of property property line- r+vproprl&e prop fly Nee tmMng ptamment property line Table 1.1.D 2. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site . as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Design a public space to be actively used. The pedestrian presence in this area is limited to the people who work inside each business. The purpose for outdoor public spaces shall be intended for the employees who work inside each business. These s aces are created in the nodes of open s ace described in the landscape guidelines. f , t � J Table 1.2.A 12 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. The streets adjacent to this neighborhood are adequate for bicycle circulation. The roads generally do not connect with other areas of town and have limited amounts of vehicular traffic coming from street cuts or other difficult traffic patterns that complicate bike travel. B. The sidewalks should be constructed within the City of Bozeman Right-of way-to service pedestrian circulation in this neighborhood. Sidewalks will provide convenient connections for this neighborhood. Additional trails are provided in the open space areas of the PT Land PUD. Major east west travel is accommodated in the financial neighborhood system. 4. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Reduce the amount of land required for automobile circulation. When mutually agreed between two properties, shared access drives are encouraged. The benefit in sharing drive access is the reduced cost of site development and shared maintenance expenses. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. Parking lots along the rear of each property shall connect to allow drive trough traffic from adjoining properties when feasible. • 13 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 5. Parking Lots • Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Parking lot designs shall be located in the rear of each lot with the building occurring in the front. property line Inappropriate building placement In building placement center of property property fine Appropriate line building plaarnent JUd property line Table 1.5.A B. Parking isles shall continue to each property boundary to allow for future connections between adjacent properties. C. Parking lots will not be used for permanent or temporary storage of goods or deliveries. The uses of these properties are required to be internal. All activities shall be inside the building. 6. Site Lighting Policy: . Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. • 14 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Incorporate the service area as part of the building design. C.. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 8. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. A. The buildings shall have an industrial warehouse feel. They should not look like a residential home. The building should look like a place of business. Good examples are 15 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines located at 600 N Wallace and 342 Gallatin Park. • I f I � Table 1.8.a- qood example of building character— 342 Gallatin Park L �r Table 1.8.A- Bad example of building character 9. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space. • 16 0 • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • 10. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 11. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. The buildings shall have an average building front between 18' and 25' in height. The building mass should step back from the building footprint if additional height is desired. B. The mass of the roof form shall not be greater then the building walls below. toss of roa greaoer than watts roof farm Is seoordary Table 1.1 LB-building example on the right shows inappropriate roof massing 12. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help promote the scale of the building. For that reason, flat roofs to low pitch roof forms with parapets should be used in this neighborhood. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop because of the lack of unnecessary roof massing. Consistent roof forms in this neighborhood are also encouraged. A. Building roof forms shall be either parapet walls or false front facades. These roof forms can be accompanied with accent roof forms as a secondary building element. Gable end roof forms are acceptable when incorporated with a primary building mass with a flat • roof or parapet wall/false front facades. 17 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • Piirnary roof form �roof form Is secondary Table 1.12.A 13. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. A. The use of metal for building siding is approved as an alternative material. The use of this material must provide a sense of scale by breaking the simple building mass into distinct building volumes or varied building layers. B. The use of wood should be avoided. Maintenance of the buildings is a concern. Products that can weather without a high level of upkeep should be used in place of wood. 14. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. • 18 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines +} i 15. Service Canopies t Policy: A gas station service area canopies should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 16. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 17. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. All electrical and communication utilities shall placed underground. 1 19 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood The intent of this neighborhood is self explanatory. The allowable uses in this district are described in table 1-B and are located in the areas depicted in table 1-1. This district requires visibility from Oak Street because the tenants rely on recognition of their businesses from the major arterial roads. The character of the neighborhood communicates the business of banking to passing motorists. The building should act as a sign. The building should be visible within a green way landscape. The architectural details should express a sense of permanence. Compact site design should allow for efficient land use that looks towards future redevelopment over time. The buildings should exist in a green way setting that allows for distant views of the Bridger mountains beyond. 1. Views Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives.for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. S 20 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines B. A building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. The setback is in compliance with the green way along Oak Street. C. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. 3. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal • automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. 21 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. • B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. • 22 • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 23 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A, building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20% of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop. Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. • B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. B. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 24 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 16.Service Canopies Policy: A service area canopies should be incorporated into the overall design of the building. 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical • lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems ad security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. 25 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 3-Support Services Neighborhood This district helps the financial and hospitality and regional anchor neighborhood with a supply of services or people to make the overall commercial corridor successful. The success of the support services neighborhood is directly dependant on the vitality of the anchor neighborhood. This relationship of mutually beneficial land use will create a sense of neighborhood by providing a customer base for each other. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. Vertical construction should be encouraged. Building to the maximum building height is suggested. Requests for relaxations or deviations from the city of Bozeman would be supported by these guidelines. The second and subsequent floors will provide additional office space or apartment living units. Internal connections of pedestrian circulation and vehicular access are required between the anchor neighborhood and support services neighborhood. The intent for this neighborhood is a higher level of quality of construction and architectural design. Simple materials can be used as long as a higher level of attention to its details is accomplished. The types of permitted uses are described in table 1- C and a located in the areas depicted in table 1-1. 1. Views • Policy: Views will be diminished by the construction of multi story buildings. Therefore, view opportunities should be framed by all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. • 26 r PT Land PUD Development Guidelines A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them J 9 in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. B. Buildings should define intersections with a strong building presence. This can be accomplished by proposing second floor building area at the corners of intersecting streets. umrd OM baYd ar Ylw�plon �� J amadway street ilimmil �—Mdal eamadway Table 3.23 • C. The specified setback for this neighborhood is 7 feet from: front property line. Buildings are allowed to articulate the building envelope for design aurposes but in general, 75% of the building envelope shall be located on the building front yard setback(s). - 25%arbw'A9mma 75%of buldag ma33 A a i h I I i lT bNdb9 bated w or nm papaly sededc \ papery Ona `-fiact cob��, Table 3.2.0 D. The additional 10 feet of open space area as shown on the PUD plan for lots within this neighborhood shall be nodes of open space equal to the area of the open space setback for each lot. As an example, lot 3 of block 3 has 4,911 s.f of additional open space required for the PT Land PUD. This area shall be located to crate an active outdoor 27 0 r PT Land PUD Development Guidelines space appropriate for the uses in this neighborhood. Additional details relating to nodes of open s ace are covered within the landscape guidelines. preparly w \ \ ce -ode d asp• `\ w�=aw are rr.pertr w br.ldn9 mass n setbad w road onftaft Table 3.2.D E. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. property Ine Inappropriate LbW"nggWp- cen t In building plan-ent of properly operty erne ppropry� I'ne wltdin pWarnent 1 properb Ine Table 3.2.E 28 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 3. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated • system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 29 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide • efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated,with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical . 30 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. The second and subsequent floors will provide additional office space or apartment living units. Refer to building placement to ensure a quality street space and efficient land use. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: • The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. Vertical construction should be encouraged. Building to the maximum building height is suggested. 31 • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines - Requests for relaxations or deviations from the city of Bozeman would be supported by these • guidelines. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20% of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop. Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. • C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. The intent for this neighborhood is a higher level of quality of construction and architectural design. Simple materials can be used as long as a higher level of attention to its details is accomplished. A. The use of metal for building siding is approved as an alternative material. The use of this material must provide a sense of scale by breaking the simple building mass into distinct building volumes or varied building layers. B. The use of wood should be avoided. Maintenance of the buildings is a concern. Products that can weather without a high level of upkeep should be used in place of wood. 32 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 16. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. • 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. 33 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 4- Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood The area included in this district is held in one large lot and is highly visible from Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane. The lot size is large enough for a hotel convention center or a national retailer. Property with this kind of exposure to the highway and access to arterial street networks will allow for regional retail exposure or hotel uses that will be successful in this location. This location is adjacent to the open space area of enhanced we and watercourse features. Trails and access to the public exist in this area. Because of the proximity to trials and open space, any proposed site plans for this Neighborhood shall incorporate these amenities into the final site design. 1. Views Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. • B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will:be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. B. A building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. 34 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 3. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The unique character of this neighborhood is the proximity to the majority of the natural wetland areas and the open space provided within the PUD. The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the sita. B. Design a public space to be actively used. C. Develop a strong link between the open space and the trail system though out the area. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. i A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 35 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and 36 0 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. • A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at • least 20% of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, 37 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as • columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop. Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural • setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood, 16. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. • 38 • 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may i-ic:lude telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems aid security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized 39 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Landscape Guidelines The landscape design for the PT Land Planned Unit Development will comply with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance, Design Objectives Plan, and the landscape requirements as defined by the PT Land PUD Development Guidelines. The landscape design contributes significantly to the Oak Street corridor. Wide landscape buffers are designed to tie this development to others in the area and provide comfortable open space for pedestrian circulation. Plant selections submitted with this Site Plan shall provide the development with a sense of unity internally as well as compliment surrounding developments. The design shall provide a variety of experiences for community members by providing pedestrian pathways along the streetscape and along the stream/wetland corridor in the northwest and northeast corners of the development. The plantings will be combined with berms and swales to create topographical interest and to screen and buffer development from surrounding uses. Large plantings provide easy visual identification of entryways. The specific design guidelines as defined below may be altered within the framework of this PUD based on design merit and with the requirement being that the overall concept must be maintained throughout the development and the landscape points must be attained. Landscaping on each lot must meet or exceed the minimum requirements outlined in the zoning • ordinance in order to achieve the higher quality of design expected with a PUD. These requirements are outlined in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Entryway Corridor Plan, which reflect design intentions for planned unit developments. Due to the project location, this planned unit development must adhere to the Greenway Corridor Landscape Standards. Further, this project will exceed minimum landscape standards as outlined in 18.060 of the Unified Development Ordinance. All lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscape performance standards points. Lots 1,2, and 3 of Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 points. These lots shall also meet the screening requirements in accordance with 18.48.050.13 and 060.B.3. General Landscape Guidelines At this time, landscaping for the PT Land PUD will follow general planting concepts as shown on the proposed Conceptual Landscape Plan. Landscape improvements will include extensive landscaping throughout the project. A primary goal in landscaping of open spaces within the project is to create usable outdoor rooms. Open space from one lot to another shall be located so as to create visual and physical continuity from lot to lot and to create larger green spaces that provide for a variety of outdoor uses. Landscaped spaces shall be integrated with building 40 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines entries, employee use areas, as well as public use areas. To reduce or eliminate the dependence on treated city water, on-site wells may be installed for irrigation purposes. Larger tree and shrub plantings, combined with complete irrigation, will be utilized for an immediate landscape impact. Oak Street Frontage Important considerations for this area includes the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by a formal alternating arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold'), Norway Maple (Acer platanoides), Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer freemanii 'Jeffersred'), or other suitable species, at 50-foot intervals along all street frontages. To the inside of this line of trees additional buffering of parking lots will be created by natural, rolling berms planted with groups of Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens), Canada Red Cherry (Prunus virginiana 'Canada Red'), Amur Cherry (Prunus maackii) Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides), Brandon Elm (Ulmus 'Brandon') and other suitable species. The yard landscaping points shall be met with groups of large evergreen trees, small ornamental trees and large canopy trees for each 50 lineal feet, in addition to the street trees. Turf grass would be present around these • plantings. The plantings and berms present in the greenway create a variety of visual experiences for pathway users. All plantings shall be placed with consideration as to path use and safety, visibility into parking lots for security personnel, view corridors, terminated vistas, and appropriate screening for the adjacent developments. Plant selection ties to the Bridger Peaks development by repeating the use of the Black Ash as street trees but creates variety and a unique identity by using Amur Cherry and Canada Red Cherry. Creativity shall be encouraged in the plantings, and entrance focal points will be created. In these cases, clusters of evergreen and deciduous shrubs, perennial flowers, and boulders may be used to assist in creating focal point plantings. All plantings must meet requirements set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance Entry Corridor Overlay District 18.30, and Planned Unit Development 18.36.100, and the Design Objectives Plan chapter 5.0.Section D. Greenway Corridor Landscape Standards. Patrick Street , Tschache Lane, North 15t', and North 11th Frontage Primary consideration for these areas include the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by a formal alternating arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold'), Norway Maple (Acer platanoides), Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer freemannii), or other suitable • species, at 50-foot intervals along all street frontages. Lots 1,2, and 3 of Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 points. These lots shall also meet the screening 41 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines requirements in accordance with 18.48.050.E and 060.6.3. Baxter Lane Landscaping This landscape buffer will enhance visual perception of the development from Interstate 90. Baxter Lane will be lined with a formal street tree arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold') or other suitable species. The large expanse of greenspace will utilize evergreen trees, deciduous trees and rolling berms to create a park-like setting. The plant palette may include Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens), Quaking Aspen (Po ulus tremuloides), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Canada Red Cherry (Prunus virginiana `Canada Red'). Stream Corridor The stream corridors in the northwestern and northeastern corners of the property will be afforded significant setback and may be buffered from the development by berms, landscaping and other appropriate means. A pathway is planned for the northeast area to allow pedestrian . access from the development as well as adjacent properties. The fifty foot watercourse setback area shall meet all requirements of the U.D.O 18.42.100. Zone 1 shall include plantings of native trees and shrubs at the required densities. All disturbed areas in both Zones 1 and 2 shall be seeded not a native grass/ forb mix appropriate to the site specific conditions. Plantings should be limited to native species of trees and shrubs to enhance the riparian nature of the corridor. It is desirable to leave the native grasses unmown thereby enhancing the feel of a natural stream bank community. Interior Parking Lot The parking lot layout shall provide for traffic control, shading and pedestrian access. Japanese Tree Lilac (Syringa reticulata), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Prairie Spire Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica `Rugby') are trees that may be utilized in the parking lot islands. Planting of islands with a variety of shrubs to provide screening and traffic control will also be included. Pedestrian Use Areas Pedestrian access shall be provided throughout the development. Concrete walks are to be • 42 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • provided along Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, North 11'', North 14t', North 15`h, and Tschache Lane with lateral extensions into the site. The 8 foot wide asphalt trail shall be continued along Oak Street. A minimum 6-foot wide pedestrian path shall be provided along the stream to the east. This path shall meet the requirements for city standard natural fines trails. A primary pedestrian access shall be provided through the site and shall consist of concrete sidewalks and at-grade marked pedestrian crossings connecting on site entry points, pedestrian destinations and off site developments. Building Envelope Building envelopes will include plantings to soften and enhance the architecture, and sufficiently screen service and utilities from the street. General locations for these plantings shall be determined through Site Plan Review and shown on a landscape plan. Materials shall include some of the species used in the overall development, but some variety will be allowed for individual expression and identity. A landscape plan will be required for these pad sites. The landscape design provides a strong unifying element to the overall design of the development. • '"All plant varieties suggested are to act as a guideline. As new, improved cultivars are developed variation from the listed varieties will be allowed. Submitted by Shelly Engler, Landscape Architect, Cashman Nursery & Landscaping, May 29, 2006, revised 06/04/2007. • 43 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Sign Design Criteria Guidelines • The PT Land Property is proposed to be a B-2 zone. It is the intent of this proposed PT Land Property Planned Unit Development to follow existing regulations within the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance as described within the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The Sign Design Guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14`h 2005. The BDOP is a comprehensive development guideline and should be understood and adhered to when proposing a building within this property. These Sign Design Criteria Guidelines are organized into the four neighborhoods outlined in the Architectural Guidelines. Chapter 1-Service Warehouse Neighborhood Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood Chapter 3- Support Services Neighborhood Chapter 4-Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood A map showing the location of each neighborhood is shown in table 1-1. The four neighborhoods uses are listed in tables 1-A, 1-B,1-C,1- D and are included in the Architectural Guidelines. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines are organized into two sections per neighborhood district. • 1. Sign Design Policy: 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: For complete Sign Code Regulations refer to Chapter 18.52 of the Unified Development Ordinance: Sign Design Criteria Guidelines Summary: It is the intent of the guidelines to serve as a tool for sign design, fabrication and installation location on lots of the PT Land Property Planned Unit Development. For specific details, refer to the City of Bozeman Design Objectives Plan, Unified Development Ordinance and B-2 district zoning sign ordinances. • 44 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • Chapter 1-Service Warehouse Neighborhood 1. Sign Design: Policy: Signs should adequately convey information while remaining subordinate to the site and the surrounding area. Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter, the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. All signs should be developed with the overall context of the building. Free standing signs are restricted in this district. Low monument signs are allowed only in conjunction with a shared access drive between two properties. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: A) Freestanding signs. Low monument signs are allowed only in conjunction with a shared access drive between two properties. The only freestanding type signage allowed the Service Warehouse Neighborhood is the low profile monument style freestanding signs. The Pole-style freestanding type signage is not allowed. The maximum area for a free standing sign is thirty- two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. B) Wall signs. Wall signs are not to exceed a total allowance of one and one half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding or projecting signs. Canopy, window, and awning signs will be classified as wall signs. Lots fronting on two or more streets shall be permitted an additional thirty-five (35) percent of the already permitted wall sign area for each subsequent building frontage. C) Projecting signs. One projecting sign per tenant. Projecting signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet nor extend more than four (4) feet from the building and maintain a minimum clearance of eight(8). D) A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. • 45 • 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • • 46 • • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood 1. Sign Design: Policy: Signs should adequately convey information while remaining subordinate to the site and the surrounding area. Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter, the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. Free standing signs are restricted in this district. A. Locate a sign on a building such that it will emphasize design elements of the facade itself. B. Mount a sign to fit within architectural features. Use the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms seen along the street. C. A sign should be in proportion to the building, such that it does not dominate the appearance. D. A sign should be designed to integrate with the architectural features of a building, not distract attention from them. E. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. F. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: A) Freestanding signs. One freestanding sign is permitted per zoned lot. The only freestanding type signage allowed the Service Warehouse Neighborhood is the low profile monument style freestanding signs. The Pole-style freestanding type signage is not allowed. The maximum area for a free standing sign is thirty-two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. B) Wall signs. Wall signs are not to exceed a total allowance of one and one half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding or projecting signs. Canopy, window, and awning signs will be classified as wall signs. Lots fronting on two or more streets shall be permitted an additional thirty-five (35) percent of the already permitted wall sign area for each subsequent building frontage. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of • an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. 47 • • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines C) Projecting signs. One projecting sign per tenant. Projecting signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet nor extend more than four (4) feet from the building and maintain a minimum clearance of eight(8). D) A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. ,Chapter 3- Support Services Neighborhood 1. Sign Design: Policy: Signs should adequately convey information while remaining subordinate to the site and the surrounding area: Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter, the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. All signs should be developed with the overall context of the building. Free standing signs are restricted in this district. Low monument signs are allowed only in conjunction with a shared access drive between two properties. A. Locate a sign on a building such that it will emphasize design elements of the facade itself. B. Mount a sign to fit within architectural features. Use the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms seen along the street. C. A sign should be in proportion to the building, such that it does not dominate the appearance. D. A sign should be designed to integrate with the architectural features of a building, not distract attention from them. E. Awning and canopy signs are appropriate in areas with high pedestrian use, such as within a commercial complex or along a more pedestrian-oriented corridor. F. A directory sign are required where several businesses and/or residences share • 48 0 • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • a building. Coordinate and align several smaller signs, or group them into a single panel as a signs directory. G. Use similar forms or backgrounds for the signs to tie them together visually and make them easier to read. H. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. I. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: A) Freestanding signs. One freestanding sign is permitted per zoned lot. The only freestanding type signage allowed the Service Warehouse Neighborhood is the low profile monument style freestanding signs. The Pole-style freestanding type signage is not allowed. The maximum area for a free standing sign is thirty-two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of • an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. B) Wall signs. Wall signs are not to exceed a total allowance of one and one half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding or projecting signs. Canopy, window, and awning signs will be classified as wall signs. Lots fronting on two or more streets shall be permitted an additional thirty-five (35) percent of the already permitted wall sign area for each subsequent building frontage. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. C) Projecting signs. One projecting sign per tenant. Projecting signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet nor extend more than four (4) feet from the build ng and maintain a minimum clearance of eight(8). • D) A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. 49 0 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more • tenant spaces on a lot. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. Chapter 4- Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood 1. Sign Design: Policy: Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter, the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. Free standing signs are permitted in this district. Lots adjacent to the Interstate fall under Interchange Zone. A. A monument or pole mounted sign are acceptable when in areas where the • primary use is set back from the street edge. B. Locate a sign on a building such that it will emphasize design elements of the facade itself. C. Mount a sign to fit within architectural features. Use the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms seen along the street. D. A sign should be in proportion to the building, such that it does not dominate the appearance. E. A sign should be designed to integrate with the architectural features of a building, not distract attention from them. 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: Each lot shall be permitted one freestanding sign which may include either a (A) low profile type sign or a (B) pole-style type sign. General B-2 zoning regulations apply for all other type of signs (wall, projecting, window and etc). A) Low Profile signs: The maximum area for a low profile sign shall be 40 square feet. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet with a maximum height of 8 feet. • 50 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • B) Pole type signs: A pole type freestanding sign shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet and will maintain at least an 8 foot minimum vertical distance. Poles style signs shall not exceed a total area of 40 square feet or 16 feet in height, provided however, that for every 2 feet said sign is set back from 15 feet beyond the street right-of-way, the height measured at grade may be increased by 1 foot, not to exceed a total of 32 square feet, and the area may be increased by 2.5 square feet for every 2 feet that said sign is set back 15 beyond the street right-of-way up to a maximum of 120 square feet. C) A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. • 51 MORRISON ENGINEERS l� I.,u�I � SURVEYORS s: PLANNERS SCIENTISTS JAL MAIERLE, INC. 3011 PALMER STREET•MISSOULA,MT 59808.406.542-8880 FAX 406-541-0009 An Employee-Owned Canpany January 24, 2008 —E D Mr. Brian Kruger ' JAN 2 Q 2008 City of Bozeman Department of Planning & DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Community Development AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 1230 20 E. Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: Response to comments for PT Land Planned Unit Development Dear Mr. Kruger: This letter is in response to your January 14, 2008 letter regarding the'PT Land Planned Unit Development. 1. Regarding Condition #6. A trail cross section detail that meets City Standards shall be provided with the final landscape plan. The Final Landscape Plan is updated to include the trail section details. The Plan includes notes to indicate the appropriate section for each trail and includes a note that references a City Standard sidewalk on Baxter Lane to comply with the Subdivision Conditions of Approval and Findings of Fact. The binders were updated on-January 24, 2008 by Cashman Nursery. 2. The installation of the signal at Northl5th and West Oak Street should be included in the proposed improvements for Phase A in the Phasing Schedule. The Phasing Schedule for Phase 1 is updated to include the signal at North 151h Avenue and West Oak Street. A copy of this letter and the Phasing Schedule is added to the PUD application binders under the Correspondence Tab. 3. Please provide further documentation verifying that the payment made from PT Lands to Tange Family LLC for improvements to North 11th included the Tange Water Payback. Dustin Johnson with the City of Bozeman Engineering indicated during a phone conversation on 1124108 that the City would not hold up the Planned Unit Development on this item since it is already tied to the Final Plat. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 406-542-4825. "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" MORRISON MAIERLE,INC. Sincerely, Morrison Maierle Inc. Molly R. Skor ik .E. cc: Jerry Perkins M:\3948\0041Docslcorres\Agency\Response to City of Bozeman B Kruger 012408 comments.doc.docx Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase T Lot Proposed Improvements • Patrick Street between North 14`h Avenue and North 151h Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14'h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Water connection to Tschache Lane system to include Block 1 Pressure Reducing Station in access road on north side of Lot 1 1 (bank site), Block 1. Lots 1-5 . Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Block 2 and Block 4. • Installation of signal at North 15'h Avenue and Oak Street. • Tschache Lane between North 15`h Avenue and North 14'h Avenue. • North 151h Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 2 • Water service provided by connection to Tschache Lane for Lot 4 2, Block 2. Lot's 1, 3 and 9, Block 2 connect to extensions Lots 1-4 constructed during Phase I. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to south boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14'h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Block 3 alternative eliminates main between Lots 4 & 5 if Phase 1 2 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements Lots 1-3 or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through a portion of Block 2 and Block 4. , 1 Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Tschache Lane improvements between North 141h Avenue and North 11`h Avenue. • North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand Block 3 alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and 3 Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Lots 4-6 alternative eliminates main between 4 & 5 if Phase 1 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on. Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3, Block 3). • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 151h Avenue and Block 4 North 11'h Avenue. 5 • Water to be pulled from Tschache System and looped through Lots 1-3 Lot 1 Block 4. • Regional detention facilities, in Lots 2 and 3, Block 4. • Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 onl . 0 MOMSON ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS LAI[Al MMERLE,INC. 3011 PALMER STREET-MISSOLIA,MT 59808 406-542-8880-FAX 408.54i-OMTS An Employee-Owned Company January 24, 2008 FrJAN Mr. Brian Kruger 2 4 2008 City of Bozeman Department of Planning & DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Community Development AND COMMLNITY DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 1230 20 E. Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: Response to comments for PT Land Planned Unit Development Dear Mr. Kruger. This letter is in response to your January 14, 2008 letter regarding the PT Land Planned Unit Development. 1. Regarding Condition #6. A trail cross section detail that meets City Standards shall be provided with the final landscape plan. The Final Landscape Plan is updated to include the trail'section details. The Plan includes notes to indicate the appropriate section for each trail and includes a note that references a City Standard sidewalk on Baxter Lane to comply with the Subdivision Conditions of Approval and Findings of Fact The binders were updated on January 24, 2008 by Cashman Nursery. 2. The installation of the signal at Northl5th and West Oak Street should be included in the proposed improvements for Phase A in the Phasing Schedule. The Phasing Schedule for Phase 1 is updated to include the signal at North 151n Avenue and West Oak Street. A copy of this letter and the Phasing Schedule is added to the PUD application binders under the Correspondence Tab. 3. Please provide further documentation verifying that the payment made from PT Lands to Tange Family LLC for improvements to North 11th included the Tange Water Payback. Dustin Johnson with the City of Bozeman Engineering indicated during a phone conversation on 1124108 that the City would not hold up the Planned Unit Development on this item since it is already tied to the Final Plat. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 406-542-4825. "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" p 'j MORMSON � MMERLE,iNc Sincerely, Morrison Maierie Inc. Molly R .R. Skor E. cc: Jerry Perkins M:1394810041Docslcorres\AgeneMesponse to City of Bozeman B Kruger 012408 co-mments.doc.doc% Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Patrick Street between North 14th Avenue and North 15th Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Water connection to Tschache Lane system to include Block 1 Pressure Reducing Station in access road on north side of Lot 1 1 (bank site), Block 1. Lots 1-5 . Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Block 2 and Block 4. • Installation of signal at North 15th Avenue and Oak Street. • Tschache Lane between North 150 Avenue and North 14th Avenue. • North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14`h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 2 • Water service provided by connection to Tschache Lane for Lot 4 2, Block 2. Lot's 1, 3 and 9, Block 2 connect to extensions Lots 1-4 constructed during Phase I. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to south boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Block 3 alternative eliminates main between Lots 4 & 5 if Phase 1 2 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements Lots 1-3 or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through a portion of Block 2 and Block 4. Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Tschache Lane improvements between North 141h Avenue and North 11'h Avenue. • North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14'h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand Block 3 alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and 3 Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Lots 4-6 alternative eliminates main between 4 & 5 if Phase 1 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3, Block 3 . • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 15'h Avenue and Block 4 North 11`h Avenue. 5 • Water to be pulled from Tschache System and looped through Lots 1-3 Lot 1 Block 4. • Regional detention facilities, in Lots 2 and 3, Block 4. • Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 only, . f i • Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Patrick Street between North 14'h Avenue and North 15ch Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Water connection to Tschache Lane system to include Block 1 Pressure Reducing Station in access road on north side of Lot 1 1 (bank site), Block 1. Lots 1-5 . Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Block 2 and Block 4. • Installation of signal at North 15'h Avenue and Oak Street. • Tschache Lane between North 150 Avenue and North 141h Avenue. • North 15'h Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14°i Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 2 • Water service provided by connection to Tschache Lane for Lot 4 2, Block 2. Lot's 1, 3 and 9, Block 2 connect to extensions • Lots 1-4 constructed during Phase I. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to south boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 10 Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Block 3 alternative eliminates main between Lots 4 & 5 if Phase 1 2 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements Lots 1-3 or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through a portion of Block 2 and Block 4. Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Tschache Lane improvements between North 14"' Avenue and North 11"'Avenue. • North 14"'Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand Block 3 alone altemative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and 3 Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Lots 4-6 alternative eliminates main between 4 & 5 if Phase 1 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3, Block 3). • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 15"' Avenue and Block 4 North 11th Avenue. 5 • Water to be pulled from Tschache System and looped through Lots 1-3 Lot 1 Block 4. • Regional detention facilities, in Lots 2 and 3, Block 4. • Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 only. • Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase Lot Proposed Improvements Patrick Street between North 140 Avenue and North 15'h Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Water connection to Tschache Lane system to include Block 1 Pressure Reducing Station in access road on north side of Lot 1 1 (bank site), Block 1. Lots 1-5 • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Block 2 and Block 4. • Installation of signal at North 1 e Avenue and Oak Street. • Tschache Lane between North 150 Avenue and North 141h Avenue. • North 15`h Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 10 Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 2 • Water service provided by connection to Tschache Lane for Lot 4 2, Block 2. Lot's 1, 3 and 9, Block 2 connect to extensions • Lots 1-4 constructed during Phase I. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to south boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North le Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Block 3 alternative eliminates main between Lots 4 & 5 if Phase 1 2 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements Lots 1-3 or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through a portion of Block 2 and Block 4. • • Phase Lot Proposed Improvements Tschache Lane improvements between North 14'h Avenue and North 11 th Avenue. • North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 141h Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand Block 3 alone altemative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and 3 Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Lots 4-6 alternative eliminates main between 4 & 5 if Phase 1 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3, Block 3). • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 15`h Avenue and Block 4 North 11'h Avenue. 5 • Water to be pulled from Tschache System and looped through Lots 1-3 Lot 1 Block 4. Regional detention facilities, in Lots 2 and 3, Block 4. • Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 • only. • M ORRISONENGINEERS l�l SURVEYORS INC. PLANNERS AIAN WdERL El . C K1.1 PALMER STREET•MISSOULA,MT 59808.406-542-8380-.7"406.541 0009 An Employee-Owned Coni;:onv i January 24, 2008 i Mr. Brian Kruger City of Bozeman 4 Department of Planning & Community Development P.O. Box 1230 D 20 E. Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 ��8 DE! ''l ' �!.hVNING RE: Response to comments for PT Land Planned Unit Developm nt_ff. `�;':-�: '`. .CPMENT Dear Mr. Kruger: This letter is in response tc your January 14, 2008 letter regarding the PT Land Planned Unit Development. 1. Regarding Condition #6. a. trail cross section detail that imeets City Standards shall be provided with the fi-al landscape plan. i The Final Landscape Plans apdated to irclude the trail-section details. Tie Plan includes notes to indicate the ,appropriate section for each traa and includes a note that references a City Standard sidlowa1K cn Baxter Lane to comply Wth the Subdivision Conditions of Approval and Find.'ngs of Fact. The binders were updated on January 24s 12006 by Casnmar, Nursery. 2. The installation of the signal at Northl5th and` West Oak Street should be included in the proposed improvements forPhase .4 in the Phasing Schedule. The Phasing Schedule for Phase 1 is updated to include the signal at Nor`h 15th Avenue and West Oak Street. A copy of this 'Etter and the Phasing Schedule is added to the PUD aoolica ior-.binders under the Correspordence Tab. 3. Please provide further documentation verifying that the payment made from PT Lands to Tange Farrily LLC for improvements :o North 11th included the Tange Water Payback. Dustin Johnson with the C,ty o` Bozemar° Engineering i,rdicated during a ohone conversation on 1124108 rhat the City wou.1d not hold up the Planned Unit Development on this item s,r.-e it is already tied tc the Final Plat. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 406-542-4825. "Providing resources in portnersnip wi=h clients to ochieve their coals" MORRISON �_1 J MERLE,INc Sincerely,. Morrison Maierle Inc. olly R. Skor ik .E. cc: Jerry Perkins M:\3E48\0041Docs\corres\Agency\Resp=ise b C ty or Bozenan B Kruger +)12408 comments.doc.docx Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Patrick Street between North 14th. Avenue and North 15th Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Water connection to Tschache Lane system to include Block 1 Pressure Reducing Station in access road on north side of Lot 1 1 (bank site), Block 1. Lots 1-5 . Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Block 2 and Block 4. • Installation of signal at North 15th Avenue and Oak Street. • Tschache Lane between North 15th Avenue and North 14th Avenue. • North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 2 . Water service provided by connection to Tschache Lane for Lot 4 2, Block 2. Lot's 1, 3 and 9, Block 2 connect to extensions Lots 1-4 constructed during Phase I. Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to south boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Block 3 alternative eliminates main between Lots 4 & 5 if Phase 1 2 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements Lots 1-3 or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through a portion of Block 2 and Block 4. 0 • Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Tschache Lane improvements between North 14th Avenue and North 11 th Avenue. • North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand Block 3 alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and 3 Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Lots 4-6 alternative eliminates main between 4 & 5 if Phase 1 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3, Block 3). • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 15th Avenue and Block 4 North 11th Avenue. 5 • Water to be pulled from Tschache System and looped through Lots 1-3 Lot 1 Block 4. • Regional detention facilities, in Lots 2 and 3, Block 4. • Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 only. f I ENGINEERS r F I MORMS01 SURVE"OP.S l j PLANNERS MERLETAT SCIEN-1£-TS , iNc. 3)1'?ALM=R STFEET•MISSC-ULA.tiT 598[8.4LE-54?-8880•FQX e(i8-54M,)09 An Employee-Ownec Compary December 5, 2007 Brian Krueger City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: PT Lands PUD.Final Plan Fi a#Z-06230 Dear Mr. Krueger: Please accept the following information in response to your corlmem le:fer dated October 13, 2007, Enclosed are 6 updated binders and a packet of information to update t:-e seventh binde-tha is it your possession. Also, attached to tnis letter is a:i original s gned copy of the Final Site Plar- application and the Development Guidelines marked showing recent revisions. 1. General. The application submitted with the Final PUD Pla- is incorrect. The applicatior submitted is the development review applicaton for preliminary approval. Pease utilize the attached Final Site Ran application for the Final PUD Plan. There is a bcx to check in that application for PUD. Applicant and property owner signature required. The application is revised to ircivae the Final Site Flan application requas`ed by the -��_y Previous conversation-s with Planning, it was o!.r understanding that the Development Re:•ialti, Application and Planned Unit Development checklist were required. Both are included with this re-submittal. 2. Regarding Condition #1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines do not state "Intemai illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system thC:t backlights sign text only is permitted." as required in the Service Warehouse neighbor ood on page 45 and in the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood on page 48. The Development Guidelines are updated to address Com:men+s #249. A final version of rile Development Guidelines are included in the application :binder and a marked version show-"n_a the edits per the Ci f s comment.letter dated IOil 6107 is attachea o this letter 3. Regarding Condition #1. Tne Sign Design Criteria Guidelines do -ot state "Light badkground colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background is not permitted." as required in the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood on psge 48. Reference response to Comment#2. 4. Regarding Condition #2. There is an error in tt�e:wording regard ng low pro-% ncrument s c•ns in the Service Warehouse Neighborhood on page 45. It shouio state "Only Low profile monument freestanding signs allowed." Page 1 "Providing resources in Partnership with clients tc• echizve their goals L40 MORRISON MIA MAIERLE,Wc. Reference response to Comment#2. 5. Regarding Condition #2. There is an error in the wording regarding low profile monument signs in the Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood on page 46. It should state "Only Low profile monument freestanding signs allowed." Pole style signs are not allowed in this neighborhood per the condition. Reference response to Comment#2. 6. Regarding Condition #2. There is an error in the wording regarding low profile monument signs in the Support Services Neighborhood on page 48. It should state "Only Low profile monument freestanding signs allowed." Pole style signs are not allowed in this neighborhood per the condition. Reference response to Comment#2. 7. Regarding Condition #3. Although the development guidelines include visual examples, photos, and thumbnail sketches there are no visual examples, photos, and thumbnail sketches that provide information on building materials and colors. Reference response to Comment#2. 8. Regarding Condition #3. A set of figures is utilized for both the Support Services Neighborhood and Service Warehouse Neighborhood. There should be different sets of figures for each neighborhood in order to identify the differences between the anticipated developments in these areas. Reference response to Comment#2. 9. Regarding Condition #4. The guidelines do not clearly demonstrate the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood and the Support Services Neighborhood. Provide additional visual examples, photos, and thumbnail sketches that demonstrate the anticipated differences between these neighborhoods. Reference response to Comment#2. 10. Regarding Condition #6. The landscape plan and watercourse setback planting plans does not clearly delineate the watercourse itself, the watercourse setback including the adjacent wetlands per 18.42.100.B.3.d.2., and Zone 1 and Zone 2 that incorporate the wetland areas. Please clearly delineate all wetlands on the landscaping plans. The Landscape Plan is updated to more clearly delineate the watercourse setback including adjacent wetlands. The revised Landscape Plan is located under the Landscape Plan tab in the application binder. 11. Regarding Condition #6. A trail cross section detail that meets City Standards shall be provided with the final landscape plan. The Landscape Plan is updated to include the trail cross section detail. The revised Landscape Plan is located under the Landscape Plan tab in the application binder. Page 2 A,�MORRISON • • MMERLE,INC. 12. Regarding Condition #6. The landscape plan does not provide any details for the required landscaping or planting for the detention ponds per.page 21 of the Design Objectives Plan (DOP)for Entryway Corridors. See guideline E.2 on page 21. Each pond shall be detailed. The Landscape Plan is updated to depict plantings near the detention ponds with a reference on Sheet L-1, note #9 to the civil plans. The civil plans provide additional information in regards to the pond size, cross-section and dimensions including.riparian vegetation. The revised Landscape Plan is located under the Landscape Plan tab in the application binder. 13. Regarding Condition #6. Staff acknowledges that the necessary points for plantings have been achieved on the open space lots. The layout of the plantings seems awkward in the south yard configuration. For Open Space 2 staff suggests distributing the required yard plantings around the detention pond at the southern end of Open Space 2 in order to blend it into the landscape and bolster the plantings required by Guideline E.2 on page 21 of the DOP. For Open Space 1 staff suggests that the required southern yard plantings be allocated along the proposed trail corridor. For Open Space 3, 15 points has yet to be earned for this lot. The Landscape Plan is updated to address Comment #13. The revised Landscape Plan is located under the Landscape Plan tab in the application binder. 14. Regarding Condition #6. Provide a phasing plan for the landscape plantings in the open space lots and a proposed schedule for installation of the detention pond landscaping. The Landscape Plan is updated to include. The revised Landscape Plan is located under the Landscape Plan tab in the application binder. 15. Regarding Condition#14. No Tab 14 found. No design for the 27 ft. back of curb to back of curb exhibit found in the application. A detail sheet depicting the 27 foot back of curb to back of curb private drive is now included in Tab 14. 16. Regarding Code Provision b. See comments above regarding Condition#6. The Landscape Plan is updated to address comments regarding condition of approval #6. The revised Landscape Plan is located under the Landscape Plan tab in the application binder. Thank you and feel free to contact me at 406-582-2280 if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, oily Skorpik, FJV. Enclosures: Signed Original Application Development Guidelines with revisions noted Instruction memo to update 71h binder and information packet 6 Application Binders Page 3 MORMSON • n MMERLE,INC. cc: Jerry Ferkins Dave Hutchinson File M:\3948\004\Dots\fsite\Response to COB 131607.doc Page 4 f' �,:.. r f !� r. I 7 ' � 'j �i �� ' ��- �I �� n �', i �t �l l . ' f �!� �i �, CIROF BOZEMAN • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montano 59771-1230 www.bozeman.net FINAL SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1.Name of Project/Development: PT Land Major Subdivision and Planned Unit Development 2. Property Owner Information: Name: Jerry Perkins E-mail Address: jerry@karststage.com Mailing Address: 511 N.Wallace Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715-5757 Phone: 406-556-3521 FAX: 406-556-3515 3.Applicant Information: Name: Same as Property Owner E-mail Address: Mailing Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Legal Description: Tract 2A of COS 1215F 5. Street Address: Bounded by Oak St.,N 11th Ave,Baxter Ln,N 15th Ae and Walton s Stream/Ditch(excludes KN). 6. Project Type: ❑ Site Plan ❑ Site Plan/COA ❑ CUP ❑ CUP/COA ✓❑ PUD ❑ Other: 7. Project Description: Project is a commercial planned unit development and major subdivision F8_ For condominiums: Is a digital copy of the layout attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 9.A written narrative addressing how all of the conditions of approval ✓❑ Yes ❑ No and code provisions have been addressed is attached? Certification of Completion and Compliance —I understand the conditions of approval and the submitted final site plan or master site plan have complied with any conditions of approval or corrections to comply with code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Site Plan — I ackncwedge that construction not in compliance with the approved final site plan may r t in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. Applicant's Signat re, Date: a�Q Applicant's Signatu Date: Property Owner's Si na Date:IR-Iae7 Property Owner's Signature: Date: (Final Site Plan Application—Prepared 12/10/03;revised 01/05/05;revised 01/19/07) MORMSON ®® MMERLE,INC. An Employee-Owned Company memo TO: Brian Kruger FROM: Molly Skorpik DATE: 12/7/07 RE: PT Land PUD Submittal CC: File ❑ Urgent ❑ For-Review ❑ Please Comment [ Please Reply:__ ® For Your Use Attached is a packet of information to update the seventh application binder, which is in the possession of the City. Below are instructions to update. I added post-it notes to the information with numbers corresponding to the instructions: 1. Application (1 page) a. Insert 1 copy under the application tab. 2. Binder Cover and spine (1 page plus) a. Replace current cover and spine 3. Response to Conditions (4 pages) a. Replace response to conditions under corresponding tab. 4. Phasing Schedule (2 pages) a. Add under response to conditions tab. 5. Private Drive Detail (2 pages) a. Add under response to conditions tab. 6. Landscape Plans a. Replace landscape plans under landscape plan tab 7. Development Guidelines . a. Replace Development Guidelines under corresponding tab Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\memo\Kruger 120707.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS PUD Application PUD Conditions of Approval Response to Conditions Development Guidelines Covenants Final PUD Plan Landscape Plan PT Land Planned Unit Development Development Guidelines August 2007 Q. 1 PT Land PUD Development Guid es �. Table of Contents Introduction ....................................:................................................................................1 ArchitecturalGuidelines ..................................................................................................3 Landscape Guidelines...................................................................................................40 Sign Design Criteria Guidelines ....................................................................................44 1 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Introduction The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that a high quality design is maintained within the development of the PT Land project. This project is presented as a network of neighborhoods that transition and blend intensities of uses: Service Warehouse, Support Services, Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor, and Financial Institutions and Services. Each of these neighborhoods transition between the existing adjoining neighbors and proposed uses. Document Oroanization This document is organized into four sections: Introduction,Architectural Guidelines, Landscape Guidelines and Sign Guidelines. The table of contents on Page i identifies the location of each section. Site Planning and Phasing Site Planning and Phasing is described in detail is the Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative for this project. Open Space Allocation Due to its location in the North 19`h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor, this project will be developed as a planned unit development and meet or exceed the respective open space requirements. The PT Land PUD acts as an overall open space plan and schematically depicts a minimum of 30% open space for the entire PUD. A portion of the open space is distributed throughout the PUD to achieve a larger open space corridor along the Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek. It is the intention to demonstrate open space distribution over the entire project rather than 30% open space per lot. The Site Plan of the PT Land PUD demonstrates the ability to obtain 30% open space via greenway,stream setback and other open space areas. Community Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Pedestrian/bike trails are integrated into the PT Land development and extend into the adjoining neighborhoods to create a loop. With this project, a trail located near the Mandeville Creek will be installed. Sidewalks or trails will be installed adjacent to all public roads. Access The PT Land PUD is accessed via public roads and one private road. The public roads include Baxter Lane to the north, Oak Street to the south, North 15`h Avenue to the west and North 11"' 1 PT Land PUD Development Guide�iifes • Avenue to the east. Tschache Lane, North 14`" Avenue and Patrick Street will be extended within the project.A private road within Lot 1, Block 4 also provides access to the site. Other Requirements Lighting, noise and utility design will comply with the B-2 zone and guidelines set forth by the City of Bozeman. 2 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Architectural Guidelines Introduction The purpose of these guidelines is to provide a dynamic, attractive commercial corridor that reflects thoughtful design standards for four distinct neighborhoods proposed within the property included in this PUD. The objective for these guidelines is to describe the variety of building types and land uses that will create a sense of neighborhood. The differences from one set of design standards to another will create the dynamic and distinct sense of place desired by the city of Bozeman and the citizens who participate in the growth of our commercial districts. The building design standards are specific to the four neighborhood districts created in this PUD. The charter for each neighborhood is described in this guideline. Ideas regarding architecture, building placement, and the materials used to create our built environments are specific to the type of each neighborhood. A map showing the location of each neighborhood is shown in table 1-1.The four neighborhoods uses are listed in tables 1-A, 1-B - at ack of this document. For a comparison of uses relative to ch neig orhood, compos of per ' ed us wn in le 1-2. Scope These guidelines shall apply to all properties within the project PUD. All properties included in this PUD will be subject to, and required to adhere to the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14th 2005. These architectural guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14tn 05. The DOP is a compr hensive evelopm nt guidel' a and should be understood and adhe o w opo ' u h this rty. Organization These guidelines address specific design standards to create the four neighborhood districts within this development. They outline the charter of each neighborhood and the building design standards that reinforce the sense of place intended for this development. These guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the City of Bozeman design polices regarding building placement, parking alignment, pedestrian connections, and the green space in and around these neighborhoods. There is no need to reiterate the ideas already required within the City of Bozeman's design policies because the objectives within the BPOP apply to all entryway corridor developments within the city. The policies of the city for neighborhood design, site design guidelines, and corridor specific design guidelines are clearly described in great detail and are required to be adhered to as closely as possible. 3 J PT Land PUD Development Guide es Guideline format and compliance Each guideline topic is presented within a chapter specific to each neighborhood district. The guidelines are presented in four chapters,one for each neighborhood. First, the policy for building design and/or site planning is provided. Secondly, specific guidelines are provided to illustrate how the policies are met. Compliance with this guideline must be achieved by meeting the specific measures described in the PUD guidelines. Further compliance with the formal design concepts policy of the Design Objectives Plan is required. The method of compliance is stated as follows within the BDOP. "In many cases, compliance with a guideline can be achieved by meeting one of the specific measures described in the "bullet" line. In cases where the specific bullets do not apply,the guideline statement itself shall, and if that es not a he poli t shal use .' Page 0 . Revi procedure A hard copy of the PT Land PUD guidelines will be provided with each application to the City of 101, Bozeman planning department. As required by the UDO, all site plans shall be reviewed by the planning staff and reviewed for compliance with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP)adopted February 14`"2005. Guideline mode ications and up ates This .. entiona plates c as marke and shapes uture of this property. These guidelines will be revisited for possible adjustments every ten years in conjunction with Bozeman 2020 Community Plan document of the City of Bozeman growth policy. The direction of any adjustments, if necessary, will come from the majority of property owners within the PT Land PUD. 4 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines open . c= rt.r �. i<op8mj .4s1►L ,:�� e, •space,, . tot2; lat;�• {of'4r` bt'S ` -�btfi'� dot Z •3WYM nrWWOM nrproarooa: D �Mn•m R.otaw�4w r+dpwo� •Fl ad s«�cs. �.•� ,a�a .� -,. ��-25-24�7 TABLE 1-1 5 9 PT Land Developme G de es Table 1-A Serviee Warehouse Neoboorhood Table of Authorized Commercial Uses uMorized Uses r.w. rry.a.r�� .7.�+rrw..«.wwwr.r►.w r antllw ww� arw�awW;a a r�*ew�/N�weitrr Wwr .IIOa1.MMwtiIMFYalo�1{ ' '"6rh�crawcr;air�enr , elrtyt ` MWgwu„f •cu�werwar ancwW�• . irttvprr! r.arri ww.�aN..rw aoer.wdr�wn . w eaphuraa>.s. . - aaahtraWo Orr - .a wee .•.edr�anemu.. uewnaanu . ad�OMYwq aMae,a drMMb thn. �Irvtiy ram. sdu4lt�fW.sioiyFWq+ hrdna iltllXwli.. 67-1 •✓ lIOIE2 rrlrwKri• _ e da6r m a.oiwdramfmmon t111! h NOfit une w wria a on sKaro a wOwoant hoar. 9irroalNirw.aitr9r Kri r+N.a�EIIrOAgbClaoW iQf0,611G 6 PT Land PUD Development 3uidelines Tablet-a Prrand4l Irs WWits and 8ervkes, Table of Aufior¢ed Commercial Uses Authorized Uses wnrzs �N+blr�Mr.dM�pR'.>•tmgeieao�,gNn[ygr0yp�aM tire AM Wd 4MMZ*AM C.MW,OMW hadiift hbOhH►411sldtitil� "sednEr mafiaanaiif' 'qaM t'a4rlilYi*!x wwnstrrn+i bsde+rvjdoreiJaifer+r ridl�IretY"morsiR a NAM, 000dinodr:aEkhreioaf�� " .+ hnnacmaa?y�,mus . nr i ' .r)daa�l+�Mfr(�q.pdMbkNaw N� . ofeuta+ooaaWuo!nE+t�r!r+ OM SIP, >aoro G�citc7`at�ilmo�+lprimiuWo.p`eifdno"� "- , "�i1e4LaomaeMowiwgbraro+dfpi a+.!. - -_ . aiawwcdwmlmatwd!ai t+Matewdo�ciswandaaAalrmwx, henndnoaa oba�a:arspsuri ieei.o@Yiairaaboi�ae Ie:Ip,eMc' , 7 Land PUD Developmen uidel Ices C. able:IC pport SeWxm Neighborhood Table of AuUvmed Commeraal Uses Aurthorized Uses jsi.Mrci�risAp«fMMtpiMiaK.:r«ii+�rr+w�iywMip�iwMss�`Qi'[ P.: wpM,aY,y rr.»eira Lol W,f vna°+.rbMMnAi W �'�If40�IRgbh tpaOwtWi6Mk�OCtttnt uond.nowr�rteao tYnit�b w�yeinNHi �' -ecawarMtMyYw P; en iiwwi. P•. M�s(�1wr1 was �enp.rdrowmto arMai "MWth s w -4 P. 9ooa I�D'�k.at bhM N tlri tM nwn�. -�hQN�dmM�i�NOosf - P: ' P1 u.u6diMb0*0.' P_ ".w�u+ro►iwi�raiwritYPeMri'�w9'tov�u« A. Araitlr,-. P t "-ieecea::nau:rtki■.eWlnie*ir!!ri P` a. rif� iw.«.ti�tgrinui_rww P:� -iiottt, vr��hx c n.on wv�ea+mad wua Pp oraris.a�a.punb•1w.Y arid,ago s k W a w opmp6wt�n,qo en ur Non+. t:VNflOb6tt/m,ls.«xn0 btlafepillt bor. 8E+adnp Olt W Wrtw.n01�Pf�nr:rwyo a�NrO N O�w�I.MLBMC. 8 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines n able<•o Fbsgtaliq and Regional Anchor Neighbor Table d AUthohZed Commercial Uses udweed Uses «m« •«mrna*eroirt «w nmt� rpuaMo+M�« 1M,Ma r�n«r.«�MrW i Mw w INytlilrY«0/+OnMt Yd.dwwo.nd d�wl www , a« r«rw ew�I�w s+�cw Wawwa«rY0«n+Y «s«�rr.tmwe+ «�nwnwe. prr.anynwrwrur aa+ruraa haMren W ^ «aoMnW�a�.«arnMnwrN swnowv �«40W�iq�«i5lgo�s r •yy aEam«w w�r_wdiiwnrwtln nOflf bprr ' WrtrcAMneraM�iT.��.4 as :v11�wRhW nw?«iW,pnNiAtq �MWAwcaewm«ntls�«ICaiM N�IIIRptM pRlIA bIM14WMOt« Ik4t Iran rcwa a p«aw w rc«vww�e w sOicYiw�ntww�w,rwp el►nul,rurywaiNa.dsfr N.A►mIC 9 ' r PT Land PUD Development Guide les Chapter 1- Service Warehouse Neighborhood This district is characterized as having design qualities of an industrial warehouse area. Typical to this neighborhood are big trucks, small signs and simple building forms that highlight the functionality of purpose. Businesses generally do not rely on visibility from arterial streets and have a clientele that would travel to the location regardless of the location in town. This neighborhood has added benefit of adjacency to major arterial streets. The neighborhood should be considered a warehousing distribution and light industrial area. It should be noted that the areas within this development are located adjacent to the large storage areas of the Kenyon Noble site. The visibility from the class I and class II entry way corridors is limited or non existent when buildout of all the adjoining land is complete. The design character of this neighborhood is simple building forms. The activities of the businesses are internal and on occasion disrupt traffic for shipments and deliveries. The types of permitted occupancy uses for this neighborhood are shown in table 1-A. 1. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties,as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Buildings should define intersections with a strong building presence. This can be accomplished by proposing second floor building area at the corners of intersecting streets. Jam_-----._.'-- �J wcehaMW., Table 1.LA 10 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines B. Building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. The specified setback for this neighborhood is 7 feet from front property line. Buildings are allowed to articulate the building envelope for design purposes but in general, 75% of the building envelope shall be located in close proximity to the building front yard setback(s). The additional 10 feet of open space area as shown on the PUD plan for lots within this neighborhood shall be nodes of open space equal to the area of the open space setback for each lot. As an example, lot 3 of block 3 has 4,911 s.f of additional open space required for the PT Land PUD. This area shall be located to crate an active outdoor space appropriate for the uses in this neighborhood. Additional details relating to nodes of open space are covered within the landscape guidelines. I i r I i� ` sr.geore..raa.a+m `awsn�. �s.rta.e Table 1.13 C. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. a.r.wa .r.r.r.goo me -$OkaW. MW rw Table I.LC 11 PT Land PUD Development Guide es D. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. aoo■a IN—� E 4 WW&"tJ*a i t APPWUW � IN f � I 'Wetyke Table 1.Ll) 2.Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Design a public space to be actively used. The pedestrian presence in this area is limited to the people who work inside each business. The purpose for outdoor public spaces shall be intended for the employees who work inside each business. These spaces are created in the nodes of -ace-described in the landscape guidelines. i I i Table 1.2.A 12 ' is PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. The streets adjacent to this neighborhood are adequate for bicycle circulation.The roads generally do not connect with other areas of town and have limited amounts of vehicular traffic coming from street cuts or other difficult traffic patterns that complicate bike travel. B. The sidewalks should be constructed within the City of Bozeman Right-of way-to service pedestrian circulation in this neighborhood. Sidewalks will provide convenient connections for this neighborhood.Additional trails are provided in the open space areas of the PT Land PUD. Major east west travel is accommodated in the financial neighborhood system. 4. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided.The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Reduce the amount of land required for automobile circulation. When mutually agreed between two properties, shared access drives are encouraged. The benefit in sharing drive access is the reduced cost of site development and shared maintenance expenses. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. Parking lots along the rear of each property shall connect to allow drive trough traffic from adjoining properties when feasible. 13 PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines 5. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Parking lot designs shall be located in the rear of each lot with the building occurring in the front. ;�3.ryry, pro"kv N�pIimIIEIY<N wYer a property x pWerly Ift APPWWe Table 1.5.A B. Parking isles shall continue to each property boundary to allow for future connections between adjacent properties. C. Parking lots will not be used for permanent or temporary storage of goods or deliveries. The uses of these properties are required to be internal. All activities shall be inside the building. 6.Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. 14 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping,fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Incorporate the service area as part of the building design. C. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 8. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. A. The buildings shall have an industrial warehouse feel. They should not look like a residential home. The building should look like a place of business. Good examples are 15 r r PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines located at 600 N Wallace and 342 Gallatin Park. QA Table 1.8.a-good example of building character—342 Gallatin Park Table 1.8.A- Bad example of building character 9. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space. I 16 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 10.Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 11. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. The buildings shall have an average building front between 18' and 25' in height. The building mass should step back from the building footprint if additional height is desired. B. The mass of the roof form shall not be greater then the building walls below. bwdAayrw'e.,.a� i0d IOrm b Rm�ry n Table 1.1 LB-building example on the right shows inappropriate roof massing 12. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help promote the scale of the building. For that reason, flat roofs to low pitch roof forms with parapets should be used in this neighborhood. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop because of the lack of unnecessary roof massing. Consistent roof forms in this neighborhood are also encouraged. A. Building roof forms shall be either parapet walls or false front facades. These roof forms can be accompanied with accent roof forms as a secondary building element. Gable end roof forms are acceptable when incorporated with a primary building mass with a flat roof or parapet wall/false front facades. 17 PT Land PUD Development GAS orYmn Aor rom, �Boa am is ssamr r Table 1.12.A 13. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. A. The use of metal for building siding is approved as an alternative material. The use of this material must provide a sense of scale by breaking the simple building mass into distinct building volumes or varied building layers. B. The use of wood should be avoided. Maintenance of the buildings is a concern. Products that can weather without a high level of upkeep should be used in place of wood. 14. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 18 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 0 15. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area canopies should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 16.Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 17. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone anc electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. All electrical and communication utilities shall placed underground. 0 19 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood The intent of this neighborhood is self explanatory. The allowable uses in this district are described in table 1-B and are located in the areas depicted in table 1-1. This district requires visibility from Oak Street because the tenants rely on recognition of their businesses from the major arterial roads. The character of the neighborhood communicates the business of banking to passing motorists. The building should act as a sign. The building should be visible within a green way landscape. The architectural details should express a sense of permanence. Compact site design should allow for efficient land use that looks towards future redevelopment over time. The buildings should exist in a green way setting that allows for distant views of the Bridger mountains beyond. 1.Views Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces,street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties,as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. 20 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 0 B. A building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor.The setback is in compliance with the green way along Oak Street. C. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. 3.Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided.The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. 21 PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 6.Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance.. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not,exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. I 22 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 0 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11.Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 23 PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20%of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop.Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. B. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 24 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 16. Service Canopies Policy: A service area canopies should be incorporated into the overall design of the building. 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. 25 PT Land PUD Deve ent ' lines ' Del ted:I hapter 3-Support Services Neighborhood 9 4 This district helps the financial and hospitality and regional anchor neighborhood with a supply+--- FormattIn Adjust space between of services or people to make the overall commercial corridor successful. The success of the Latin and an text,Adjust space between text and numbers support services neighborhood is directly dependant on the vitality of the anchor neighborhood. This relationship of mutually beneficial land use will create a sense of neighborhood by providing a customer base for each other. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. Vertical construction should be encouraged. Building to the maximum building height is suggested. Requests for relaxations or deviations from the city of Bozeman would be supported by these guidelines. The second and subsequent floors will provide additional office space or apartment living units. Internal connections of pedestrian circulation and vehicular access are required between the anchor neighborhood and support services neighborhood. The intent for this neighborhood is a higher level of quality of construction and architectural design. Simple materials can be used as long as a higher level of attention to its details is accomplished. The types of permitted uses are described in table 1- C and a located in the areas depicted in table 1-1. 1.View Policy: Views will be diminished by construct) I sto buildings. herefore, view opportunities should be framed by all major site developments. Signi lcant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. 26 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. B. Buildings should define intersections with a strong building presence. This can be accomplished by proposing second floor building area at the corners of intersecting streets. 1 \: I Table 3.23 C. The specified setback for this neighborhood is 7 feet from front property line. Buildings are allowed to articulate the building envelope for design purposes but in general, 75% of the building envelope shall be located on the building front yard setback.(s). ]MEN i i l I� r � 1 arscnauaon>..aao.nuaa \ aao.na. Table 3.2.0 D. The additional 10 feet of open space area as shown on the PUD plan for lots within this neighborhood shall be nodes of open space equal to the area of the open space setback for each lot. As an example, lot 3 of block 3 has 4,911 s.f of additional open space required for the PT Land PUD.This area shall be located to crate an active outdoor 27 PT Land PUD Development GuidPines space appropriate for the uses in this neighborhood.Additional details relating to nodes of open s ace are covered within the landscape guidelines. i Odd-.r. nose✓ops tfa y � wro �Pwar M90»_1 sea"so Table 3.2.D E. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot.Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the minimum yard setbacks,the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. bl"PIX&Mt in 1 miov a vaartr 1 ` NON OACMW9 LA popaq rie i i Table 3.2.E 28 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 3.Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided.The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 29 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • 6.Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site,while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. , B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical 30 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas inimize co ' t with other abutting uses. Do not locate above utilities rvice area ong rear p lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. The second and subsequent floors will provide additional office space or apartment living units. Refer to building placement to ensure a quality street space and efficient land use. 10. Prim ry Building trance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11.Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. Vertical construction should be encouraged. Building to the maximum building height is suggested. 31 PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines Requests for relaxations or deviations rom the ci of Bozeman would be su orted b these Deleted:reform q f---------------------------pp -----y ---- guidelines. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20%of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop.Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. ing s roof s to re the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. Varying roof fo s is encouraged. Providing variety in ridge line height is ncouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. The intent for this neighborhood is a higher level of quality of construction and architectural design. Simple materials can be used as long as a higher level of attention to its details is accomplished. A. The use of metal for building siding is approved as an alternative material. The use of this material must provide a sense of scale by breaking the simple building mass into distinct building volumes or varied building layers. B. The use of wood should be avoided. Maintenance of the buildings is a concern. Products that can weather without a high level of upkeep should be used in place of wood. 3 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 16. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site cesicn. 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate tetween buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Bu Icing colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For n-zw construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. 33 PT Land P Development G ide roes Deleted: Chapter 4-Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood 4 The area included in this district is held in one large lot and is highly visible from Interstate 90 9 9 and Baxter Lane.The lot size is large enough for a hotel convention center or a national retailer. 4 Property with this kind of exposure to the highway and access to arterial street networks will 4 allow for regional retail exposure or hotel uses that will be successful in this location. This q location is adjacent to the open space area of enhanced wetland and watercourse features. 4 4 Trails and access to the public exist in this area. Because of the proximity to trials and open 4 space, any proposed site plans for this Neighborhood shall incorporate these amenities into the 4 9 final site design. 9 1.Views Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties,as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. B. A building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. 34 d PUD Developme t Guidelines I --- ------------ -------------- -------------------------------------- Dele ted, ed: 3. tdoor Public Sp ces 4 Policy: The unique character of this neighborhood is the proximity to the majority of the natural wetland areas and the open space provided within the PUD. The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. C. Develop a strong link between the open space and the trail system though out the area. --- Formatted:Bullets and Nrnbemg 4. Pedestri and Bicycle Ci ulation System Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various-functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in;a coordinated system. , } 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided.The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 35 PT Land PUD Development Guideines • . 6.Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and 36 'PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11.Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20%of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, 37 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • ' D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop.Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 16.Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. I . 38 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines 17.Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure stand out so you can differentiate between buildings. The choices in colors should not result in 10 shades of brown. Building colors should compliment each other but also not be exactly the same. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized 39 PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines Landscape Guidelines The landscape design for the PT Land Planned Unit Development will comply with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance, Design Objectives Plan, and the landscape requirements as defined by the PT Land PUD Development Guidelines. The landscape design contributes significantly to the Oak Street corridor. Wide landscape buffers are designed to tie this development to others in the area and provide comfortable open space for pedestrian circulation. Plant selections submitted with this Site Plan shall provide the development with a sense of unity internally as well as compliment surrounding developments. The design shall provide a variety of experiences for community members by providing pedestrian pathways along the streetscape and along the stream/wetland corridor in the northwest and northeast corners of the development.The plantings will be combined with berms and swales to create topographical interest.and to screen and buffer development from surrounding uses. Large plantings provide easy visual identification of entryways. The specific design guidelines as defined below may be altered within the framework of this PUD based on design merit and with the requirement being that the overall concept must be maintained throughout the development and the landscape points must be attained. Landscaping on each lot must meet or exceed the minimum requirements outlined in the zoning ordinance in order to achieve the higher quality of design expected with a PUD. These requirements are outlined in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Entryway Corridor Plan, which reflect design intentions for planned unit developments. Due to the project location,this planned unit development must adhere to the Greenway Corridor Landscape Standards. Further, this project will exceed minimum landscape standards as outlined in 18.060 of the Unified Development Ordinance. All lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscape performance standards points. Lots 1,2, and 3 of Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 points. These lots shall also meet the screening requirements in accordance with 18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. General Landscape Guidelines At this time, landscaping for the PT Land PUD will follow general planting concepts as shown on the proposed Conceptual Landscape Plan. Landscape improvements will include extensive landscaping throughout the project. A primary goal in landscaping of open spaces within the project is to create usable outdoor rooms. Open space from one lot to another shall be located so as to create visual and physical continuity from lot to lot and to create larger green spaces that provide for a variety of outdoor uses. Landscaped spaces shall be integrated with building 40 'PT Land PUD Development Guidelines • • entries, employee use areas,as well as public use areas. To reduce or eliminate the dependence on treated city water, on-site wells may be installed for irrigation purposes. Larger tree and shrub plantings, combined with complete irrigation, will be utilized for an immediate landscape impact. Oak Street Frontage Important considerations for this area includes the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by a formal alternating arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold'), Norway Maple (Acer olatanoides), Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer freemanii 'Jeffersred'), or other suitable species, at 50-foot intervals along all street frontages. To the inside of this line of trees additional buffering of parking lots will be created by natural, rolling berms planted with groups of Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea oungens), Canada Red Cherry Prunus virginiana 'Canada Red'),Amur Cherry(Prunus maackii) Quaking Aspen (Pooulus tremuloides), Brandon Elm Ulmus 'Brandon') and other suitable species. The yard landscaping points shall be met with groups of large evergreen trees, small ornamental trees and large canopy trees for each 50 lineal feet, in addition to the street trees. Turf grass would be present around these plantings. The plantings and berms present in the greenway create a variety of visual experiences for pathway users. All plantings shall be placed with consideration as to path use and safety, visibility into parking lots for security personnel, view corridors, terminated vistas, and appropriate screening for the adjacent developments. Plant selection ties to the Bridger Peaks development by repeating the use of the Black Ash as street trees but creates variety and a unique identity by using Amur Cherry and Canada Red Cherry. Creativity shall be encouraged in the plantings, and entrance focal points will be created. In these cases, clusters of evergreen and deciduous shrubs, perennial flowers, and boulders may be used to assist in creating focal point plantings. All plantings must meet requirements set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance Entry Corridor Overlay District 18.30, and Planned Unit Development 18.36.100, and the Design Objectives Plan chapter 5.0.Section D. Greenway Corridor Landscape Standards. Patrick Street ,Tschache Lane, North 15`h. and North 11th Frontage Primary consideration for these areas include the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by a formal alternating arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold'), Norway Maple (Acer olatanoides), Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer freemannii), or other suitable species, at 50-foot intervals along all street frontages. Lots 1,2,and 3 of Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a minimum of 23 points. These lots shall also meet the screening 41 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines y requirements in accordance with 18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. Baxter Lane Landscaping This landscape buffer will enhance visual perception of the development from Interstate 90. Baxter Lane will be lined with a formal street tree arrangement of Black Ash(Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold') or other suitable species. The large expanse of greenspace will utilize evergreen trees, deciduous trees and rolling berms to create a park-like setting. The plant palette may include Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens), Quaking Aspen Po ulus tremuloides), Clump Birch Betula papyrifera), and Canada Red Cherry (Prunus virainiana 'Canada Red'). Stream Corridor The stream corridors in the northwestern and northeastern corners of the property will be afforded significant setback and may be buffered from the development by berms, landscaping and other appropriate means. A pathway is planned for the northeast area to allow pedestrian access from the development as well as adjacent properties. The fifty foot watercourse setback area shall meet all requirements of the U.D.O 18.42.100. Zone 1 shall include plantings of native trees and shrubs at the required densities.All disturbed areas in both Zones 1 and 2 shall be seeded not a native grass/ forb mix appropriate to the site specific conditions. Plantings should be limited to native species of trees and shrubs to enhance the riparian nature of the corridor. It is desirable to leave the native grasses unmown thereby enhancing the feel of a natural stream bank community. Interior Parking Lot The parking lot layout shall provide for traffic control, shading and pedestrian access. Japanese Tree Lilac(Svringa reticulata), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Prairie Spire Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Rugby') are trees that may be utilized in the parking lot islands. Planting of islands with a variety of shrubs to provide screening and traffic control will also be included. Pedestrian Use Areas Pedestrian access shall be provided throughout the development. Concrete walks are to be 42 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines provided along Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, North 11`h, North 14`", North 15`", and Tschache Lane with lateral extensions into the site. The 8 foot wide asphalt trail shall be continued along Oak Street. A minimum 6-foot wide pedestrian path shall be provided along the stream to the east. This path shall meet the requirements for city standard natural fines trails. A primary pedestrian access shall be provided through the site and shall consist of concrete sidewalks and at-grade marked pedestrian crossings connecting on site entry points, pedestrian destinations and off site developments. Building Envelope Building envelopes will include plantings to soften and enhance the architecture, and sufficiently screen service and utilities from the street. General locations for these plantings shall be determined through Site Plan Review and shown on a landscape plan. Materials shall include some of the species used in the overall development, but some variety will be allowed for individual expression and identity.A landscape plan will be required for these pad sites. The landscape design provides a strong unifying element to the overall design of the development. "All plant varieties suggested are to act as a guideline. As new, improved cultivars are developed variation from the listed varieties will be allowed. Submitted by Shelly Engler, Landscape Architect, Cashman Nursery & Landscaping, May 29, 2006, revised 06/04/2007. 43 PT Land PUD Development Guide roes Sign Design Criteria Guidelines The PT Land Property is proposed to be a B-2 zone. It is the intent of this proposed PT Land Property Planned Unit Development to follow existing regulations within the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance as described within the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The Sign Design Guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14t" 2005. The BDOP is a comprehensive development guideline and should be understood and adhered to when proposing a building within this property. These Sign Design Criteria Guidelines are organized into the four neighborhoods outlined in the Architectural Guidelines. Chapter 1-Service Warehouse Neighborhood Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood Chapter 3-Support Services Neighborhood Chapter 4-Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood A map showing the location of each neighborhood is shown in table 1-1. The four neighborhoods uses are listed in tables 1-A, 1-B,1-C,1- D and are included in the Architectural Guidelines. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines are organized into two sections per neighborhood district. 1.Sign Design Policy: 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: For complete Sign Code Regulations refer to Chapter 18.52 of the Unified Development Ordinance: Sign Design Criteria Guidelines Summary: It is the intent of the guidelines to serve as a tool for sign design,fabrication and installation location on lots of the PT Land Property Planned Unit Development. For specific details, refer to the City of Bozeman Design Objectives Plan, Unified Development Ordinance and B-2 district zoning sign ordinances. 44 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 1-Service Warehouse Neighborhood 1.Sign Design: Policy: Signs should adequately convey information while remaining subordinate to the site and the surrounding area. Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter,the ability to perceive well designed signs is a nced. mat ' s and n sh be co tible buildln on the ns should be de oped with the ov all context of the ilding. Free stan ' signs are re icted in this distri t. Low monument 'gns are allowed o y in conjunction wl h a shared access drive between two properties. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2.Signage Types and size restrictions: A) Freestanding signs. Low monument signs are allowed only in conjunction with a shared access drive between two properties. The only freestanding type signage allowed the Service Warehouse Neighborhood is the low profile monuments le reestandin si ns The Pole-st le _ Deleted:Freestanding 9 p tY t - ---g 0- ' _-----Y - Deleted: may are low prolile freestanding type signage is not allowed. The maximum area for a free standing sign is thirty- monument style only. two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Light background colors on internally illuminated •signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. B) Wall signs. Wall signs are not to exceed a total allowance of one and one half(1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding or projecting signs. Canopy,w'ndow, and awning 'gns will be classifie as wall signs. Lots onting on two or more streets shal a permitted an ad 'onal thirty-five(35) ercent of the alre ermitted wall ign area for eac s sequent buildi g fr age. C) Projecting signs. One projecting sign per tenant. Projecting signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet nor extend more than four (4) feet from the building and maintain a minimum clearance of eight(8). D) A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. 45 PT Land PUD Development Guide Ines r 46 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood 1.Sign Design: Policy: Signs should adequately convey information while remaining subordinate to the site and the surrounding area. Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter, the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. Free standing signs are restricted in this district. A. Locate a sign on a building such that it will emphasize design elements of the facade itself. B. Mount a sign to fit within architectural features. Use the shape of the sign einforce t ntal lines ngs and tr s along the stre C. A sl n should be in pr portion to the bul ing, such that it es not dominate the appearance. D. A si a designed ' to with the architectural features a building, not ' tr attention from ern E. Internal illumination an entire sign pane s allowed, however, system at backlights sign to only is permitted. F. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: A Freestan 'n signs. One fr standin sin is ermitted per zo d lot. The on' fr standin D eted:Freestanding ns may be 9 9 9 9 P ---y-- -----g--, pole-style or low prof monument e signa owed the Serv' Warehouse N borhood is th w profile mon style 'tyre. freestanding sign . le-style mg type is not he maximum - Delete . area for a free standing sign is thirty-two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. Deleted:Lighting, ither internal or '-------------------------------------------------------------------- by external mean ,permitted.¶ B) Wall signs. Wall signs are not to exceed a total allowance of one and one half(1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage minus any area devoted to freestanding or projecting signs. Canopy,window, and awning signs will be classified as wall signs. Lots fronting on two or more streets shall be permitted an additional thirty-five(35) percent of the already permitted wall sign area for each subsequent building frontage. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. 7 47 PT L PUD Develo Guideline C) Projecting signs. One projecting sign per tenant. Projecting signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet nor extend more than four (4) feet from the building and maintain a minimum clearance of eight(8). D)A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire s' pan ' not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is pe fitted. Chapter - Support Services Neighborhood 1.Sign Desig . Policy: Signs should adequately convey information while remaining subordinate to the site and the surrounding area. Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter,the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. All signs should be developed with the overall context of the building. Free standing signs are restricted in this district. Low monument signs are allowed only in conjunction with a shared access drive between two properties. A. Locate a sign on a building such that it will emphasize design elements of the facade itself. B. Mount a sign to fit within architectural features. Use the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms seen along the street. C. A sign should be in proportion to the building,such that it does not dominate the appearance. D. A sign should be designed to integrate with the architectural features of a building, not distract attention from them. E. Awning and canopy signs are appropriate in areas with high pedestrian use, such as within a commercial complex or along a more pedestrian-oriented corridor. F. A directory sign are required where several businesses and/or residences share 48 • PT Land PUD Development Guidelines a building. Coordinate and align several smaller signs, or group them into a single panel as a signs directory. G. Use similar forms or backgrounds for the signs to tie them together visually and make them easier to read. H. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however,a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. I. Light background colors on internall illuminated si ns are discouraged and a e ba round no rmi 2. Signage Types and size restr tions: A) Freestanding signs. One freestan ' sig permitte er zoned lot. The on.'y freestanding type signage allowed the Service Warehouse Neighborhood is the low profile monument style �-- freestanding signs. The Pole-style freestanding type signage is not allowed The maximum area fD�e-1'e'WRee poieeorran signsmaybe• apole-style or low pro monumentfor a free standing sign is thirty-two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as styl . described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text oriy is permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system [hat backlights sign text only is permitted. �� all sl s. II signs are t to exceed a tota Ilowance of one a d one half 1.511 s re o ted:t.i ting,either intemal or -W---- --- -- ----- -------------- ------------- -------�--L- - bye tern eansispermitted.¶ feet per li foot of buildin r tage minus a a a devoted to a nding or pro' tin ¶ — . anopy,wl , d awning sl a classifie signs. Lots fro g on two or ore streets shall be permitted an additional thirty-five(35) percent of the already permitted wall sign area for each subsequent building frontage. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text or..,y is permitted. C) Projec t' g signs. One pro cting sign per to nt. Projecting sig s shall not exce eight (8) square fee nor extend more han four (4) fe om the buil ' g d maint— a mi clearance e t(8). D)A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. 49 PT Land PUD Development GAS A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs are discouraged and a white background not permitted. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel is not allowed, however, a system that backlights sign text only is permitted. Cha ter 4-Hospit lity and Regional Anchor Neighborhood 1 gn ign: Policy: Signs should be subordinate in scale and should be positioned such that they do not obscure important views. By minimizing clutter, the ability to perceive well designed signs is enhanced. Sign materials and design should be compatible with buildings on the site. Free standing signs are permitted in this district. Lots adjacent to the Interstate fall under Interchange Zone. A. A monument or pole mounted sign are acceptable when in areas where the primary use is set back from the street edge. B. Locate a sign on a building such that it will emphasize design elements of the facade itself. C. Mount a sign to fit within architectural features. Use the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of moldings and transoms seen along the street. D. A sign should be in proportion to the building, such that it does not dominate the appearance. E. A sign should be designed to integrate with the architectural features of a building, not distract attention from them. 2. Signage Types and size restrictions: Each lot shall be permitted one freestanding sign which may include either a (A) low profile type sign or a (B) pole-style type sign. General B-2 zoning regulations apply for all other type of signs (wall, projecting,window and etc). A) Low Profile signs: The maximum area for a low profile sign shall be 40 square feet. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet with a maximum height of 8 feet. 50 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines B) Pole type signs:A pole type freestanding sign shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet and will maintain at least an 8 foot minimum vertical distance. Poles style signs shall not exceed a total area of 40 square feet or 16 feet in height, provided however, that for every 2 feet said sign is set back from 15 feet beyond the street right-of-way, the height measured at grade may be increased by 1 foot, not to exceed a total of 32 square feet, and the area may be increased by 2.5 square feet for every 2 feet that said sign is set back 15 beyond the street right-of-way up to a maximum of 120 square feet. C)A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. 51 i fA L/THO/V/A L/GHT//VG Catalog Number Notes Type FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS Z INTENDED USE— Streets, walkways, parking lots and surrounding areas. CONSTRUCTION — Rugged, die-cast, single-piece aluminum housing with nominal wall thickness of 1/8". Die-cast door frame has impact-resistant, Architectural Area&Roadway Luminaires tempered,glass lens 13/16" thick). Door frame is fully gasketed with one- �p piece tubular silicone and has tool-less entry and resealing. US. Patent No. A �� D447,590.Canada Patent No.94324. FINISH—Standard finish is dark bronze(DDB) polyester powder finish,with other architectural colors available. HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM OPTICAL SYSTEM—MIRO finish, segmented reflectors for superior A t7 200W, 250W, 400W uniformity and control. Reflectors attach with tool-less fasteners and are f ' K I TM rotatable and interchangeable. Five full cutoff distributions available:Type II 10'to 35' Mounting (roadway),Type III(asymmetric),Type IV(forward throw),Type IV(wide, forward throw) and Type V (symmetric square). Specifications ELECTRICAL SYSTEM— Standard ballast is constant-wattage autotransformer. Ballasts are mounted on a removable power tray with EPA:1.2 ft2 T tool-less latch and have positive locking disconnect plugs. Ballasts are Length:28.0(71.0 cm) D copper-wound and 100% factory-tested. Porcelain, mogul-base socket Width: 16.5(41.9 cm) with copper alloy, nickel-plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed. Depth:8.3(21.0 cm) WLf INSTALLATION—Integral arm for pole or wall mounting. Optional Weight:45 Ibs(20.4 kg) L mountings available. LISTING— UL Listed(standard).UL listed suitable for wet locations(damp location listed in lens-up orientation). All dimensions are inches(centimeters)unless otherwise specified. ORDERING INFORMATION Example: AS2 2505 SR4SC 120 SPA SF DNA LPI Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line.Order accessories as separate catalog number. ASZ S IR 5?Al Series Voltage Mounting Options AS2 200S 120 SPA Square pole mounting (std) Shipped Installed Architectural Colorss AS2 250S 2081 RPA Round pole mounting SF Single fuse(120,277,347,n/a TB) Standard Colors AS2 4005 2401 WBA Wall bracket(up or down)3 OF Doubly fuse(208,240,480V,n/a TBI DOB Dark bronze 277 ASKMA2 Mast arm adapter" PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (standard) 347 DSAS2 Decorative straight arm, (no photocontrol) DWH White 4801 square pole only^ CR Enhanced corrosion resistance DBL Black TBz DSAS2R Decorative straight arm, ORS Quartz restrike system (25OW Textured Colors round pole only° maximum, lamp not included) DCAS2 Decorative curved arm, DSPD Dark gray Distribution square pole only° HS Houseside shield (SR2,SR3,SR4W) DSPJ Light gray DCAS2R Decorative curved arm, EC Emergency circuit DBLB Black SR2 Segmented Type II roadway round pole onl TP Tamper proof P Y° DWHGWhite SR3 Segmented Type III asymmetric LPI Lamp included as standard DBNH Dark bronze SR4SC Segmented Type IV forward L/LP Less lamp throw, sharp cutoff TM 5 DSPE Green Note:Aeris has a unique drilling .Shipped Separately DSPG Dark Red SR4W Segmented Type IV wide, template that requires an Aeris drilling PE1 NEMA twist-lock PE(120,ZOB,240V) forward throw pattern to be specified when ordering DSPH Red SRSS Segmented Type V Square poles.See example below. PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE(347V) DSPF Rust Example: SSA204CDM19ASOOB PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE (480V) Aeris Drilling Pattern PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE (277V) DM19AS 1 at 90 degrees DM7BAS 2 at 180 degrees AS2VG Vandal guard BM29A5 2 at 90 degrees SC Shorting Cap for PER option DM39M 3 at 90 degrees DM49AS 4 at 90 degrees BM32AS 3 at 120 degrees(round NOTES: poles only) 1 Consult factory for availability in Canada. 2 Optional multi-tap ballast 1120,208,240,277V)(120,277, Accessories: Tenon Mounting Sliplitter 347V in Canada) 3 Mounted in lens-up orientation,fixture is damp location Order as separate catalog number. Must be used with round pole mounting(RPAI. listed. Number of fixtures 4 Shipped separately Tenon O.D. One Two@180° Two@90° Three@120°Three@90° Four@90° 5 May be ordered as an accessory. 2-3/8" AST20-190 AST20-280 n/a AST20-320 n/a n/a 6 Additional architectural colors available;see 2-7/8" AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-290 AST25-320 AST25-390 AST25-490 www.lithonia.com for more information. 4" AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-320 AST35-390 AST35-490 Outdoor Sheet#:AS2-S AL-140 ® ~ - Z » a En -2. o� � ! / _; \ ! ® / \ N » (§} 'L : (\f $ nw5. 7 G ? {(\ 6.1 q ({ƒi 2 J / co P. - ~ / E±/ ; ; [ - /\ � } \ n ƒ} ® c_ m / }\\ \ \\ . . cn CT) F;— `mom e&_%e�aG;w m~ § °mT e&m%«MOUNTING HEIGHT / {m A 2 / \ \ \ \ .� \ _ 7 2 [ ; , � k § a* 7 - ( E 2 > " 0 # CD ° 2 0 ({/} cn All cn W` 44 e _r \ \ � }\ \® \ c ( LIM e $ E \ 2 E q ; - m `mom e\_%«G_GGHe~ § ` © - ` - ° z \ r �m_ew_s«m_mm_~ § m Z;; o s '7 z , e � \ o 3 - _ _ - - - : k t- - ' _7 ` A § §2 ca - \ \ } °gym a%m%«GaG;HEIGHT \ § ( \ 0 0 IFA L/THON/A L/GHT/NGa Catalog Number Notes Type FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS E 1 INTENDED USE— Streets, walkways, parking lots and surrounding areas. CONSTRUCTION— Rugged, die-cast, single-piece aluminum housing with nominal wall thickness of 1/8". Die-cast door frame has impact-resistant, Architectural Area & Roadway Luminaires tempered,glass lens(3/16"thick). Door frame is fully gasketed with one- E:�� piece tubular silicone and has tool-less entry and resealing. US. Patent No. AS2 D447,590. Canada Patent No.94324. FINISH—Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder finish,with other architectural colors available. HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM OPTICAL SYSTEM— MIRO finish, segmented reflectors for superior F r7 I t 200W, 250W, 400W uniformity and control. Reflectors attach with tool-less fasteners and are L f� .J TM rotatable and interchangeable. Five full cutoff distributions available: Type II 10'to 35' Mounting (roadway),Type III (asymmetric),Type IV(forward throw),Type IV(wide, forward throw) and Type V(symmetric square). Specifications ELECTRICAL SYSTEM—Standard ballast is constant-wattage autotransformer. Ballasts are mounted on a removable power tray with EPA:12ftt T tool-less latch and have positive locking disconnect plugs. Ballasts are Length:28.0(71.0 cm) D copper-wound and 100% factory-tested. Porcelain, mogul-base socket Width: 16.5(41.9 cm) with copper alloy, nickel-plated screw shell and center contact. UL listed. Depth:8.3(21.0 cm) I INSTALLATION—Integral arm for pole or wall mounting. Optional Weight:45 Ibs(20.4 kg) L mountings available. LISTING— UL Listed(standard).UL listed suitable for wet locations(damp location listed in lens-up orientation). All dimensions are inches_(centimeters)unless otherwise specified. ORDERING INFORMATION Example: AS2 250S SR4SC 120SPA SF DNA LPI Choose the boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the appropriate line.Order accessories as separate catalog number. I 7 Sp Series Voltage Mounting Options AS2100S 120 SPA Square pole mounting (std) Shipped Installed Architectural Colorss AS2 250S 2081 RPA Round pole mounting SF Singly:fuse(120,277,347,n/a TB) Standard Colors AS2 400S 2401 WBA Wall bracket(up or down)3 OF Double fuse(208,240,48OV,n/a TB) DOB Dark bronze 277 ASKMA2 Mast arm adapter" PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (standard) 347 DSAS2 Decorative straight arm, (no photocontrol) DWH White 480' square pole only^ CR Enhanced corrosion resistance DBL Black TB2 DSAS2R Decorative straight arm, QRS Quartz restrike system (250W Textured Colors round pole only" maximum, lamp not included) DCAS2 Decorative curved arm, DSPD Dark gray HS Houseside shield(SR2,SR3,SR4W) Distribution square pole only" EC Emergency circuit DSPJ Light gray SR2 Segmented Type II roadway DCAS2R Decorative curved arm, DBLB Black g yp y round pole only TP Tamper proof DWHGWhite SR3 Segmented Type III asymmetric LPI Lamp included as standard DBNH Dark bronze SR4SC Segmented Type IV forward L/LP Less lamp throw, sharp cutoff TM s DSPE Green Note:Aeris has a unique drilling Shipped Separately DSPG Dark Red SR4W Segmented Type IV wide, template that requires an Aeris drilling pE1 NEMA twist-lock PE(120,208,240V) forward throw pattern to be specified when ordering DSPH Red S115S Segmented Type V Square poles.See example below. PE3 NEMA twist-lock PE(347V) DSPF Rust Example: SSA204CDM19ASODB PE4 NEMA twist-lock PE(480V) Aeris Drilling Pattern PE7 NEMA twist-lock PE(277V) DM19AS 1 at 90 degrees DM28AS 2 at 180 degrees AS2VG Vandal guard BM29AS 2 at 90 degrees SC Shorting Cap for PER option OM39AS 3 at 90 degrees OM49AS 4 at 90 degrees DM32AS 3 at 120 degrees(round NOTES: poles only) 1 Consult factory for availability in Canada. 2 Optional multi-tap ballast(120,208,240,277V)(120,277, Accesso,ies: Tenon Mounting SlipfiHer 341V in Canada) 3 Mounted in lens-up orientation,fixture is damp location Order as separate catalog number. Must be used with round pole mounting(RPA►. listed. o Number of fixtures 4 Shipped separately Tenon Q.D. One Two@180° Two@90° Three@120°Three@90° Four@90° 5 May be ordered as an accessory. 2.3/8" AST20-190 AST2.)-280 n/a AST20-320 n/a n/a 6 Additional architectural colors available:see 2-7/8" AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-290 AST25-320 AST25-390 AST25-490 www.lithonia.com for more information. 4" AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-320 AST35-390 AST35-490 Outdoor Sheet#:AS2-S AL-140 0 0 AS2 High Pressure Sodium Area Lighting Coefficient of Utilization Initial Footcandles AS2 400S SR2 TEST NO: LTL10103 AS2 400S SR3 TEST NO: LTL1010 S2 400S SR4SC TEST NO: LTL1010 0.5 -z .2 -2 x x x r' 0 1w 1w -1w = x x c2 oil z Z kL OZ pZ 0 Z 5 1f 5 1� tf 2.5 0 2.5 a 1.15 ur 1'1 u! 2 m 2 0.5 0.5 2 r 0.25 0.25 7 Z 3K 3? 3z w w to Z V Z Z 4� qFZ 4F � � 0 5 5 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 W lamp,rated 50000 W lamp,rated 50000 W:amp,rated 50000 lumens.Foolcandle values based on 20' lumens.Foolcandle values based on 20' lumens.Foolcandle values based on 20' mounting height. mounting height. mounting height. Classification:Type 11,Medium,Full Cutoff Classification:Type 11.Medium,Full Cutoff Classification:Unclassified(Type IV,Very Short),Full Cutoff AS2 400S SR4W TEST NO: LTL10106 AS2 400S SR5S TEST NO: LTL10107 .2 -2 tw -1w x = t7 Z z OZ pZ z > j 5 t0 5 to 2.5 0 5 0 1.5 20 2.5 2� 1 Z 1.s q 0.5 3— 1 3Z 0.25 Z 0.25 z 4F 4F Vr ;q O p 5 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 W lamp,rated 50000 W lamp,rated 50000 lumens.Footcandle values based on 20' lumens.Foolcandle values based on 20' . mounting height. mounting height. Classification:Type IV,Medium.Full Cutoff Classification:Unclassified(Type IV,Very Short),Full Cutoff NOTES: 1 Photometric data for other distributions can be accessed from the Mounting Height Correction Factor Lithonia Lighting web site(www.lithonia.com). (Multiply the fc level by the correction factor) 2 For electrical characteristics consult technical data tab. 10 ft. = 12.25 3 Tested to current IESNA and NEMA standards under stabilized 15 ft. = 5.4 laboratory conditions.Various operating factors can cause 30 ft. = 1.36 differences between laboratory and actual field measurements. 401t, =077 Dimensions and specifications are based on the most current data and are subject to change. Existing Mounting HeightZ = Correction Factor New Mounting,Height' Lithonia Lighting L/THON/A L/GHMVG® Acuity Lighting Group, � Outdoor Lighting One Lithonia Way,Conyers,GA 30012 An"cuifvBrands Company Phone:7-70-922-9000 Fax:770-918-1209 In Canada:160 avenue Labrosse,Point-Claire,P.Q.,H9R 1A1 Sheet#:AS2-S ©2002 Acuity Lighting Group,Inc.,Rev.02/06 www.lithonia.com OCTOBER 24, 2006 BUSINESS TO BUSINESS BY NICK EHLI , BUSINESS TO BUSINESS EDITOR BY NICOLE ROSENLEAF RITTER I MANAGING EDITOR To contribute call 582-2647 "With any luck, we'll just pick it commercial subdivision would be. up and move it and everything will The development itself—if approved arrive in one piece,"Anderson said. — —will border not only Kenyon-Noble Nicole Rosenleaf Ritter but also the new Lowe's and the planned Hilton Homewood Suites. — Plans continue Nicole Rosenleaf Ritter for north-side Former Thai development restaurant to go A 47-acre, 18-lot commercial Mexican subdivision—planned for land owned by Karst Stage's Jerry Perkins The restaurant most recently —is under consideration again with known as Smilers is getting a new look the city planning department. The —and taste. Roy Lee—who owns 2.07 million-square-foot parcel, which Impact Advertising but is also known Perkins has owned for 20 years, locally for his culinary acumen—is stretches north from Oak Avenue to renovating the space on West Main Baxter Lane and west from North 11th Street into a new Mexican restaurant Avenue to North 15th Avenue. that he's calling 18 Miles to the Border. Perkins and his representatives at "I grew up 18 miles from the the engineering firm Morrison- Mexican border in Patagonia,Arizona," Maierle, Inc. have submitted Lee explained. "After I school when I applications three times, Perkins would go to my buddies' houses,we noted, in a process that he estimates wouldn't have PBJs, we would have has so far taken two years. burritos and tacos. I've always loved "We thought we would be Mexican food." through it by now," Perkins admitted. Lee said that the concept for 18 One tenant—American Bank— Miles is that of a traditional taco has committed to a lot, Perkins said. stand, where all of the food is That deal was to have closed a year prepared fresh and from scratch. ago but has been put on hold as the "I'm going to be preparing the application process has continued. food right in front of the customer," "We've had a lot of other Lee said, adding that all of his recipes interest," Perkins asserted. "A lot of have been developed from original people have asked,but we can't really Mexican ones. take anything to the table." Lee readily acknowledged the Plans for the five-phase checkered past of the space at 131 W development include at least one lot Main St., saying that he knows that dedicated to an as-yet-undetermined "everyone says it's jinxed." hospitality property—possibly a "There is a tree that sits in front "conference center," according to of that space that is one of only six in Perkins. The equivalent of two lots: Bozeman. It's unique, and I like that," will be converted into green space for Lee said. "And I've always liked the the development, and the remaining location,because I think it's a gateway 15 spaces are intended for"retail sales, into Bozeman." wholesale sales, and service Plans for renovations include businesses," according to the latest developing the patio space further and application. making the space more open in both Perkins indicated that past feeling and actual footage, Lee said. applications have been-derailed by a He hopes to open near the end of variety of factors, including one November or beginning of December. unexpected turn-downstemming "I think that if it's put together fromfa problem with the sites weed arfd 1packaje j pr erl we'll be able �I '"` n 9�fI21I` 79 I control plan. Despite. e pro6�ems, td nt lm-this into i fulfi tace," he said. ^ Perkins said he believedl•.that the city "I think we can make it feel like did not have an issue with the overall Mexico." intent to develop the property. Smilers, which was a coffee shop "That commercialArea really as well as one of Bozemans only Thai kicked off with Kenyoij Noble," he restaurants, closed last month. — said of the gentrattfMf°,fNf!CK -_-Ni'cole Rosenl'e'af Ritler' ' • • . ' ' ' 'r BUSINESS TO BUSINESS OCTOBER 24, 2006 Golf.fitness. facility to open LOCAL INDI4 in Bozeman SOLD OUR 3-CJ 300 Golfers looking to improve their game will soon be able to get state-of- the-art,golf-specific training at a new private gym opening at 2304 N. 200 Seventh Ave. Christopher Ross, a t , former personal trainer at The Ridge i `I and a Titleist Performance Institute certified golf fitness instructor,hopes to tat r open Fluid Motion Golf and Fitness "right around Christmas time." Fluid Motion plans to offer only one-on-one training and will have the Northwest's only3-D computer golf �99e p g Residences—all types analysis. "People can come into the club and get hooked up to electromagnetic sensors with readers,"Ross explained. individualized plan designed to we "From there, all the data goes into the enhance the client's golf game, Ross Fh computer and analyzes the client's said. thf kinematic sequence. That tells us if the "The whole process gives us a very body is working the right way." clear idea of what a person's physical na Using that data as well as limitation patterns are,"he noted. "Then- pe information collected during an we can work on fixing everything." m; extensive physical screening process, In addition to its general fitness thi Fluid Motion's trainers will create an equipment—cardio machines and -r 7s i CITAF BOZEMAN 6 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406-582-2260 20 East Olive Street fax 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 www.bozemon.net NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR A SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN WITH RELAXATIONS Applications have been submitted that would allow a major subdivision for a planned unit development with relaxations on property generally bounded by Baxter Lane, North 11°i Avenue, West Oak Street, and North 15"' Avenue. You are receiving this notice because you are the current owner of record for property within 200 feet of the affected site,or have otherwise been identified as an interested or affected party. 'The purpose of the public hearing before Planning Board is to consider the subdivision Preliminary Plat application only, and the public hearing before City Commission is to consider the subdivision Preliminary Plat application and further to consider a Conditional Use Permit for PUD Preliminary Plan application with relaxations for the proposed PT Land Planned Unit Development, requested by the owners, PT Land, Jerry Perkins, 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715-5757, and representative, Morrison-Maierle, Inc., 3011 Palmer Street, Missoula, MT 59808, pursuant to Chapters 18.06, 18.34, 18.36 and 18.66 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant is requesting relaxation of standards in the Bozeman Municipal Code for the following sections: 1) 18.44.080.A,to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane; 2) 18.44.080.A,to build a 10-foot asphalt trail instead of a sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane; 3) 18.44.060,to build North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard;4) 18.44.060, to build North 15'h Avenue between Patrick.Street and Tschache Lane without a sidewalk on the west side;5) 18.44,to not construct a planned collector street(North 151h Avenue) from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane and to allow construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connection between Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane; 6) 18.44.010.E, to terminate Tschache Lane in a dead-end near the west property line; 7) 18.42.040.13, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands,and access control; 8) 18.42.040.13,to allow Block 4 to exceed 1,320 feet in length;9) 18.42.040.C,to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation; 10) 18.42.040.D,to not provide a right-of-way with pedestrian walk in Block 3 to divide a continuous block length in excess of 600 feet; 11) 18.42.100.B.6.a,to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1; and 12) 18.42.100.B.3.c, to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 35 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. Said applications would allow development of— 47 acres into 18 lots for commercial development and open space with American Federal Savings Bank as the initial phase of the PUD,on property generally bounded by Baxter Lane, North I I"' Avenue, West Oak Street, and North 15"' Avenue. The property is legally described as Tract 2A COS 1215F, located in Section I, T2S, R5E, PMM, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. The zoning designation for said property is B-2 (Community Business District). PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING On Preliminary Plat Only BOZEMAN PLANNING BOZEMAN CITY BOARD COMMISSION Tuesday,November 21,2006 Monday, December 11,2006 7:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Community Room Community Room Gallatin County Courthouse Gallatin County Courthouse 3 I.1 West Main.Street 31.1 West Main.Street Bozeman,Montana Bozeman,Montana The City invites the public to comment in writing and to attend the public hearings. Written comments may be directed to the City of Bozeman Department -of Planning and Community Development, P. 0. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Maps and _ related data regarding this application may be Subject reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of ! property xfer`h Planning and Community Development, Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations B'Z Z z for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582- — 2301 TDD . PT Land PUD Preliminary Plan/Plat • #Z-06230/#P-06057. fD A W Oak-St R-O R-4 77 planning • zoning subdivision review . annexation • historic preservation • housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination Relaxation Requests Code: BMC 18.44.080.A General Request: To eliminate the sidewalk from the north side of Baxter Lane Engineering Response: Engineering will support this request. Because of the close proximity of the interstate engineering staff will support not installing sidewalk on the north side of entire length of Baxter Lane. The typical section of the improved Baxter Lane should match what has been installed for the Lowe's Subdivision to the west of this development including lane widths, sidewalk on the south side, striping, and curb and gutter. However, currently there exists a mid-block pedestrian crossing west of this development. With the improvements to Baxter Lane the developer shall provide a pedestrian crosswalk, with adequate signage, striping, and lighting, at a full street intersection. The preferred intersection to provide this crosswalk would be at N. 15`" and Baxter. The concern is that a crosswalk located at a standard intersection would be safer for pedestrian use than a mid-block cross walk located on a curve of a minor arterial. Code: BMC 18.44.080.A General Requests: To build a 10 foot asphalt trail south of Baxter Lane in lieu of a standard city sidewalk. Engineering Response: En in�g will not support this request. Currently policy does not view asphalt trails as equivalent alternatives to city standard sidewalk. The applicant may install the asphalt trail in addition to the sidewalk, but not in lieu of. Code: BMC 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards Request: To build North 15`h Avenue north of Patrick Street to a 65 foot wide collector standard instead of a 90 foot collector standard. Engineering Response: En ink will this request. The continuation of the street section that exists for N. 15t" would be acceptable by engineering. The extension of the North 15`h must meet minimum collector standards, which include a minimum back of curb to back of curb width of 45 feet wide. Code: BMC 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards Request: To eliminate the sidewalk on the west side of North 15`h Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. Engineering Response: Engineering will not support this request. The street section that exists for N. 15t'has sidewalk on the west side. To not continue this Ih sidewalk would hinder any potential pedestrian traffic along N 15 Code: BMC 18.44.010.B. Relation to Developed Areas Request: To provide a private drive connector between Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane in lieu of extending a public street (N 15`h or 14`h Ave). Private Drive shall be a minimum 30- foot wide, be privately maintained, with full public access. Engineering Response: Engineering will not support this request. The transportation plan originally called for a N. 15th Ave to connect(North/South) Baxter Lane and Oak Street. The desired route cannot be achieved due to existing wetlands. A collector standard(minimum BOC to BOC of 42')must be installed connecting Baxter and Oak. The placement and alignment of this collector can be modified from the original transportation plan to fit within the existing topography and the development. A 30' foot wide private drive will not be adequate to serve as a public collector. Code: BMC 18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets. Request: To terminate Tschache Street at the intersection with N. 15`h Avenue near the west of property line Engineering Response: Engineering will not support this request. The transportation plan calls for Tschache to run all the way to N. l lth Ave. The proposed plat provided shows Tschache being constructed from N. 15th to N. 1 lth. As long as Tschache is constructed from the property line on the west to N. 1 lth, a relaxation will not be required. Code: BMC 18.42.040.B Block Length. Request: To allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control. Engineering Response: En ineeriniz has no input for this request. Code: BMC 18.42.040.B Block Length. Request: To allow Block 4 to exceed 1320 feet in length due to its irregular shape, the presence of extensive wetlands along two watercourses and the desire to maintain a single consolidated parcel that has been designated as a site for hospitality/convention center uses. Larger lots with single and multiple uses already exist on the adjoining properties and this relaxation will not cause any harm to the public welfare. Additionally Block 4 will be served by 4 trail and at least one private access drive. Engineering Response: Engineering has no input for this request. 0 0 Code: BMC 18.42.040.C, Block Width. Request: To allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography. Engineering Response: Engineering has no input for this request. Code: BMC 18.42.040.D Rights-of-way for Pedestrians. Request: To permit the platting of commercial lands in Block 3 with no pedestrian circulation. Engineering Response: Engineering has no input for this request. Code: BMC 18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback. Request: To permit on-site storm water treatment facilities in the Zone I but in no case will the treatment facilities encroach closer than 30 feet from the actual watercourse as defined by the channel bank. Engineering Response: Engineering has no input for this request. Code: BMC 18.42.100.B.3.c. Watercourse Setback. Request: To reduce the setback from the actual watercourse from SO to 35 feet along Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane to allow from the routing off. 1 S'h Ave. Engineering Response: Engineering has no input for this request. PT Land Planned Unit Development / Conditions,of Approval Criteria Binder 4 - August 2007 Revised December 2007' --- - --- — I OMMON x x\x\x `� • + - . _ - Iw® PATMR—X F_R-E-EMANII —' — NTING .MRQUANTITIES�SYMBOLS SIZE GSCNTI :SIZE R EEN ASH -2° � � ORE 0'-60' B0 FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANIC 'PATMORE' (ACE a— — U LE JEFFERSRED NORWAY MAPLE 91 DES O • - _ Other species may be used with approval of City of Bozeman Forester ^ Al H u' w :• QUAKING ASPEN ' ' + 7REMULOIDES 2-3SDLG 40-50 34 COMMON C R INIA ER Y PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 4-5'SDLG 25'-30 26 o OLDEN WILLQ C j x ✓® 2-3'SDLG 60'-70 20 \ SALIX ALBA VITELIINA' �' S �x a® RED TWIG DOGWOOD 12-18° 3'X6' 76 n3 CORNUS SERICEA \ + $ASKATOON SERVICEBERRY - J AMELANCHIER_ALNIFOM--- SDLG---_4'-6' �.137 O -- �; + RS LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES: _ .... ._,....__..-.,__. _. . - -7 1. All discrepancies between plan and written speci ications shall be reported to Landscape x \ �90 Architect.immediately. Plan provides all quantities for bidding purposes and shall prevail. 0 k \ 2. Plant sizes shall meet or exceed standards set by the American Nursery and Landscape x + Association. \ 3. Lawn Areas: All areas disturbed during construction shall be reclaimed using the native `�gi�ula�lrlf�� \ ix. As lots are developed lawn areas will be installed using a;bluegrass lawn mix and .` +f awn seed mix shall be as follows: • Common Kentucky Bluegrass 26% Newport Kentucky Bluegrass - 27% ••.,r^ v 1 \+ 1 Park Kentucky Bluegrass 27% M.. \x \ Perennial.Ryegrass 12% vnnna00%,h \ *. Creeping Red Fescue 8% I \ Rate—4#/ 1000 sq.ft. O O O Z' \ \ B. Zone I -Wetland seeding: Bottom of detention pond and any areas disturbed by trail \ construction shall be seeded as follows(both Zone.1 and 2): SP E x Western Wheaigrass 50X, Streambank Wheaigrass 50% i7 4 sq.ft. i \ Rate=2#/ 1000 sq.ft. 6 7 acres Wetland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or September 15 to aFx e4 05 z `.I'�• I 1 \• yx November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 ` O x shall,be hydromulched. Uve 'I EXISTING BUI SING I - \ :- :specrfedL s lawn o Upland shallb seeding:e estoredby eed areas disturbed ingto adryla d bm construction as follows: that not. \ Slender Wheaigrass 25% i _ ar \ x Western Wheatgrass 45X rt r x \ ThP 9 icks ike Wheat rasa 15% s x - - , .: •.' 1 - \ Sheep Fescue 15X - In/ Role=l2m ft. co Dryland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or September November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 x O - I X j+ 1 - - \ - \ • shall be hydromulched. x i B. Prior to layout of plantings and beds contractor will have utilities located. No trees - x x - \ \ / x shall be located closer than.10 feet from sewer or water lines. Landscape Architect shall v� x�x� _ x\ - � approve entire layout prior to installation. $"'°°' I k ti LOT 1 9 \ rn c11 Ln � 480,687 sq,ft. o M • x 11.04 acres l i cN �u G N °• �r � m ro M O Q) [D N O o 0 - x EXISTING I N P N a m x 1 ( E A a 119 7as N x 2. 5 a '� o ® Berm I , I 9 C) I x _ x . I CC I Berm t I Scale I"=60r-0" WV I IXw— W Large Sitting Boulders 4 �+ - �I•. IX W E T 2 S HAC LA W IXW _ GRAPHIC.SCALE LO x a ee eo 22,640 sq.f x 0.52 acre IN FEETILL= Large Sitting Boulders 1flf9Su f S HAC LA Exw—_ExW: LOT 2 " •. •.' ��"� ram— - COMMON NAMC PLAITING MATURE OOANTITIES I .. SYMBOLS i SCIENTIFIC SIZE20 f I GREEN ASH . 1)4'-2" 0'-60' 60 ENS0.52aCo R J ACAUSFEMANIIEFFERSRED' - 1%e•-2". 40-50 49 00 _ NORWAY MAPLE O LOT 3 F w LATAN I 40'-50' 91 LOT 4 6 Other species may be used with approval of City of Bozeman Forester 52,172 sq.ft. G N I—I Ln .I LOT 5 w POPULUS REMULOIDES 2-3'SDLG, 40'-50' 34 1.20 acres 61,609 sq.ft. m LOT 6 a OMMON CHOKECHER Y 51,850 sq.ft. ' RUNUS VIRGINC 4-5'SD 25'-30 26 71,1 51 sq.ft. OLDEN WILLQW 2-3'SDLD 60-70 20 _x—x--xJ 1.41 'acres 1.19 acres U0 S fa SALIX ALGA VITELLINA' 41 x — 1.63 acres ast <il ®. RCiTWI sOGWOA.D 12-16 3'X6' 76 O (AMELANCHIEREALNIFOE AZ-.-- --SOL ._4�-5' .__137 O CQ B-2 y 0 UCLA 73 RYDER ROAD I 2 v L T 1 9 38,4 6 sq.ft. LOT 4 _ 0. 8;acres 44,759 sq.ft. LOT 3 LOT 2 I R — — -- ----- -- -- - ----- - LOT 1 s LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES 1.03 acres 61,557 'Sq.ft. 51,886 sq.ft. s!'. - 1. Al discrepancies between plan and written specifications shall be reported to Landscape 1.5 acres q 71,321 sq.ft. Y Architect immediately. Plan provides all quantities for bidding purposes and shall prevail. -1.19 acres 1.64 acres I 2. Plant sizes shalt meat or exceed standards set by the American Nursery'and Landscape p. Association. z 3. Lawn Areas: All areas disturbed during construction shall be reclaimed using the native `UUUrII!41/r�� mix. As lots are developed lawn areas will be installed using a bluegrass lawn.mix and '` •.r, R gated. ge� d' : - 0 Lawn seed mix shall be as follows. - �73 i• r w E rxw y I Common Kentucky Bluegrass 26% b = ice E y- Newport Kentucky Bluegrass � 27% - 3• rn � r D°-mow Exw eaw _E„w Park Kentucky Bluegrass 27% ''o, .:. •• + axw sxw I Perennial Ryegrass 12% ��rnpnrunl0 K eaw-THE T e it Q creeping Red Fescue BX 3 Rate.= 4#/ 1000 sq.ft. • I 6. Zone I -Wetland seeding: Bottom of detention pond and any areas disturbed by trail I can shall be seeded as follows(both Zone 1 and 2): II Western Whealgross 50% - -- - - - - Streambank Wheotgross 50% P Rate=2#/ 1000 sq.ft 37,149 sq.ft. 37,149 sq.ft. I o Wetland seeding shall be completed between March 15 to May 31,or September 15 to 0.86 acres 0.85 acres I I I November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 I'. shall be hydromulched. - s " I 11 7. Zone 2- Native Upland seeding: Any areas disturbed by construction that are not }'A� - specified as lawn shall be restored by seeding to a dryland mix as follows: f' Slender Whealgross 25% Western Whealgross 45% r4 a I Thickspike Whealgross 15% t Sheep Fescue 15% s 45 Q Role=2/1 ft. Drylandseeding shall be completed ed between March 15 to May 31,or September 15 to aE�� b November 1 as weather allows. Soils shall not be frozen. Slopes greater than 3 to 1 shallromu be hydlched. 38,773 sq.ft. th yn - ,1 8. Prior to layout of plantings and beds contractor will have utilities located. No trees X,4 ` 0.89 acres 38,558. Sq.ft. - I S! shall be located closer than 10 feet from sewer or water lines. Landscape Architect shah F 3 0.89 acres £ B I approve entire layout prior to installation. I I COLTER DRIVE 04 I ., I S r\ 1Z w s v a Z "I g� In kD CI) 11 .� .'•'� N I-• dam' cn I I I CD r� >< l� I I I I O E <1 x n o E Ln m I I I Z = m 00 N U' D I I I y Z � 0 � I m � m • I , �op� II =I � I r I I I I Im Z I 143,219 sq.ft. I I 3.29 acres �Mc I O II II l O 0 E � o 0 .I I. I � o 0 I (�N _ rig 5calc 1 60'-0" w a.a -- —— ——— w W �-618�� ON al4�yg �y • r �. ----- - GRAPHIC SCALE • L �css ease o[/O rxae -. I ( IN FEET) • aN6 � � � 1 Inch= 60 1t. + SYMBOLS COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES SCIENTIFIC'NAME SIZE SIZE OLORADO SPRUCE 60 8'-10'' �PICEA PUNGENS) eee '-70 4 BRANDON AMERICAN ELM (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON') 2-zY2" 60'-70' 2 x� \ A CANADA RED CHERRY O xx C PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED' 2-2Y2 25 -30' 5 * _f10 MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 5. I \s Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. U A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be. d planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. Q k Landscape Points: Required 15 m k Provided: 15 Total x` x X 5 South Yard x 5 Boulders CL Cu \ 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) Q o 0 j 1 W2 �p o LOT 2 , I (OP SP E) I ,7 4 sq.ft. / I 6 7 acres A x . I EXLSTI G. BUI DING I SYMBOLS COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE \\ POI SPRUCE x - 8'-10' 60'-70 11 �PICEA PUNGENS) w 60_70' 3 FULMUO AMERICANA 'BRANDON) 2-zX * g :Y ANADA ERRY z " 25'-30' 4 O / I I \ i \ r C PRUNU RED CHS VIRGINIANA CANADA RED' 2-Nt MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 5 u, k \ ' Notes: All landscaping will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. A utility locate shall be done prior to plant layout and no tree shall be - o� =/ \\ planted closer than 10 feet from any water or sewer line. 1 i I Landscape Points: Required=15 ,4 d o 11 / N �u ` Provided: 15 Total +N I— x N 5 South Yard o O W 5 Boulders o rnco I N O 5 Drought tolerant plants(*100%) ^ N C) " EXISTING I N P N o N 0 a- m .� ® (O E A 77) y / ! / N a � / 0 o. N / I 00 O I O I o i I Berm 5cale P-50'-O` I Berm\ L Large Sitting Boulders \f I GRAPHIC SCALE n IN FEET) exw—_mow -- "-_ qae Sil ing BSII"derma Ex w---Exw— 8 Exw 1 i ch= 50 ft ._ L Martin Matsen From: Martin Matsen Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 11:03 AM To: Troy Miller; Greg Allen; Rob Lateiner Subject: PT Lands Troy, Greg and Rob, I have looked into the open space and drainage issues that remain within the PT lands subdivision and PUD. From everything I can see the Commission clearly approved deferring the required landscaping and dedication of the open space until such time as phase 5 (the area north of Tschache Lane)was being completed. Upon review of a site plan for the land south of Tschache Lane the applicant will need to show how drainage will operate in the near term but would not be required to landscape or dedicate the open space at that time. I hope this helps as you move closer to closing. Please let me know if there are additional questions or concerns I could address. - Marty MARTY•MATSEN, AICP Director I Community Development I City of Bozeman 20 East Olive St. I P.O. Box 1230 1 Bozeman, MT 59771 Office:406.582.22621 Mobile:406.589.5480 1 mmatsen@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net 0 Planning n Building 0 Historic Preservation n Code Compliance 1 � s� r Inter-office Orieinal to: City of Bozeman Planning Department P.O.Box 1230 111111 IIIII IIII!Ilill!(IIII Iillll(IIII 111 IIIII IIII IIII 2273755 z fP Charlotte Mills-Gallatin Co MTMISC 35.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PT LAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION,4Z-06230 ' HEREAS,the undersigned property owner acknowledges the receipt of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman to establish a unified development plan of—47 acre: subdivision for the development of 18 commercial and open space lots,with American Federal Savings Bank as the initial phase of the PUD, with the following approved relaxations from the City of Bozeman Municipal Code: a) §I8.44.080.A General,to not build a sidewalk on the north side of Baxter Lane. b) §18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards,to build North 1 5th Avenue between Oak Street and Tschache Lane to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard. c) §18.42.040.C. Block Width, to allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. d) §18.42.100.B.6.a. Watercourse Setback,to permit on-site stormwater treatment facilities to be located in Zone 1. e) §18.42.100.B.3.c.Watercourse Setback,to reduce the watercourse setback from 50 to 36 feet along the Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane. WHEREAS;the subject property is legally described Tracts 2 and 3 of COS 121 located in Section 1,T2S,R5E,P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana.; and WHEREAS,the Conditional Use Permit is subject to the following 14 conditions and code provisions: Conditions: 1. The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall address illumination and coloring in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan. Internal illumination of an entire sign panel should not allowed, however a system that backlights sign text only may be permitted. Light background colors on internally illuminated signs should be discouraged and a white background not permitted. PT Land PUD CUP:#Z-06230 PAGE 1 of 5 r J �A V The Sign Design Criteria Guidelines shall restrict the Qeestanding signs in the Financial Institutions and Services(green),Service Warehouse Neighborhood(red)and Support Services . Neighborhood(yellow) areas to low profile monument type signs in keeping with the sense of neighborhood intended to be created by this PUD,the transitioning of uses,and the residential adjacency. 3. The Development Guidelines shall include visual examples/photos/thumbnail sketches of such things as roof lines,materials,colors, architectural details,etc. 4. The Development Guidelines shall more clearly demonstrate how the differences between the Hospitality and Regional Anchor 'neighbor (blue) and the Support Services Neighborhood (yellow) areas are to be achieved. 5. The Final PUD Plan shall demonstrate which lots are located with the entryway corridors. It appears that Lots 1-5,Block I may be located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor,and Lot 1,Block 4 and Lots 5 and 6,Block 3 may be located with the I-90 entryway corridor. 6. The landscape plan prepared and certified by a qualified landscape professional for the open A space lots,Lots 2 and 3,Block 4,shall be submitted for review and approval as part of the.Final_ PUD Plan in accordance with§18.78.100 and 18.48.Completion of the landscaping in the open sp`acehots may be phased as proposed with the stormwater retention/detentions ponds.andJ co" mpleted with Phase 5F— r r 7. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Lot 1,Block 4 at the time of site development in accordance with§19.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. 8. The Final PUD Plan shall require the construction of a mid block crossing on Block 3 at the time of site development in accordance with §18.42.040.D.Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians.The two lots responsible for construction of the mid-block crossing shall correspond to the right-of-way established with the Final Plat. 9. The Development Guidelines shall discuss landscaping requirements. At the time of site plan development,all lots shall achieve a minimum of 15 landscaping points. Per 18.48.060,Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 have residential adjacency and shall achieve a mirumum of 23 landscaping points. Screening is required for residential adjacency in accordance with §18.48.050.B and 060.B.3. 10. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure pursuant to §18.34.100.C.1 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 11. That all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns; shall be binding upon PT Land PUD CUP:4M6230 PAGE 2 of 5 Page: 2 of 5 2273755 I IIIIII IIIII II�II IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII 11l IIII�IIII(I{I 07/27/2007 12:22P Charlotte Milts-Gallatin Co MTMISC 35.00 w J the owner of the land, his successors or assigns. shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property ommer prior to the issuance of any building permits,final site plan approval or commencement of the conditional use pursuant to §18.34.100.C.2 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. 12. The final PUD plan shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Ordinance.The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval,does not,in any way,create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 13. All site plans which meet or exceed the design review thresholds of §18.34.040.0 shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and recommendation. 14. Block 3 shall include a north�south public street from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane and Block 1 shall include an east/west public street from North 14'h Avenue to North 15"' Avenue. As a PUD,these public streets may be designed to the minimal width acceptable to the Engineering Department. (As added by City Commission.) Code Provisions: a. Per 18,80.1460,this property is not located adjacent to the I-90 interchange at North 7lh Avenue, and therefore does not meet the definition for Interchange Zone.All reference to signage in the Interchange Zone shall be removed from the Sign Design Criteria Guidelines. b. A qualified landscape professional shall either document that the current watercourse setback planting plan meets the requirements of Section 18.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or a watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 outlined in Section 19.42.100 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. c. Per Section 18.36.090.E,all PUDs shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space,exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape.Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.A minimum amount of open space needs to be,provided on every lot,and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. The applicant shall document the provision of performance points. A table showing the computed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. d. Per Section 18.36.090.E, non-residential PUD development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision.Property located outside,but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and PT Land PUD CUP:4Z06230 PAGE 3 of 5 II 2273755 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIIII ill�l I�IIII IIII�III IIIII III I Page 3 of 5 III 07/27/2007 12.22P Charlotte Mills-Gallatin Co MTMISC 35.00 contributes to the intent and purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan.The applicant shall document the provision of perfotmance.points. A table showing the--omputed PUD open space shall be included on the final plan. e. Per I S.36.100 in accordance with the Design Objectives Plan Update for North 19`1' Avenue/ Oak Street Entryway Corridor, at least one-half of the required open space in West Oat: Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as"common open space easements"located on individual lots or parcels of land,and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors, f The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final PUD Plan within one(1)year of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plan approval has been,satisfactorily addressed. ! WHEREAS,the right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all. general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure and shall constitute restrictions running with the land. WHEREAS,all of the special conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. WHEREAS,all of the conditions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land,successor or assigns. WHEREAS,all of the special conditions attached to this Conditional Use Permit shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the:use. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT HEREBY KNOWN,that the above-noted 14 conditions of Conditional Use Permit approval shall be binding upon me, the undersigned owner of the subject property,my successors or assigns,as long as the'subject property is developed under the terms and PT Land PUD CUP:hZ-06230 PAGE 4 of 5 IIIIIIllillIIIIIIIIi�lll III111107127/2007 2273f 55P 111111111111111111111 It charlotte Mills-Gallatin Co MTM15C 35.00 conditions established by the City Commission in their approval of the PT Land Planned Unit Development Subdivision. DATED THIS C�o DAY OF 2007. c P ERTY 0 PT and,Umontana general partnership Jerry Perkins,General Manager 511 North Wallace Street,Bozeman, MT 5 9715 STATE OF :ss County of �A[10 � On this &04, day of �.� �� 2007, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana,personally appeared.Jerry Perkins,known to me to be the General Manazer, of PT Land. a Montana general partnership; the partnership that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on behalf of said partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Q � (Signature above) \ ..``-. ^mil'.Qtt e ��to�e S • •;(deal) (Printed Name above) Notary Public for State of Montana .'.Z Residing at: o rr. Commission Expires: u 1 (Use 4 digits for expiration year) IIIIII�I�I�IIIII IIIIII�NII IIIIII IIII�Ill IIIII IIII Illl 227 of 37522P Charlotte Mills-Gallatin Co MTMISC 36.00 PT Land PLD CUP:4M6230 PAGE 5 of 5 SEP 15 2006 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2006 PT LAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/MAJOR SUBDIVISION �v PRa WT f 1 l i PATRU STREET i i rI 1 LUMBER T _ BRIDM PEAKS I VILLAGE ('-Z-062�30 PERKINS PUD CUP for PUD f =r- Baxter/Oak/llth/15th _ PT Land (Jerry Perkins) - - '- September 15 , 2006 - - -_------------ . f>Aii �) CASAMAN AiURSERY MORRISON MMERLE, INC. ENGINEERS ,yyI MORRIS N SURVEYORS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS 1i A M/UERLE, INC. 3011 PALMER STREET•MISSX_A,MT 59808.406-542-8880 FAX 406-541-0009 An Employee-0ioned Company September 14, 2006 Lanette Windemaker Contract Planner City of Bozeman 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: PT Land Preliminary Plat/Planned Unit Development Application Dear Lanette, Please accept 28 copies of the PT Land Preliminary Plat/Planred Unit Development application package with supplemental information. Also included in the body of this letter are responses to Planning comments stated in the Cjty le ter dated August 8, 2006. Each of City Planning comments are stated with responses immediately following in italics. 1. It appears that PUD relaxations have been requested from the following sections of the BMC. .Please review these relaxations carefully to ensure that they are correctly described. For clarification, the relaxation requests have been re-organized in a document located in Appendix A of the application binder. Please note that relaxation request of BMC 18.44.010 Relation to Undeveloped Areas is not requested; however, a relaxation of BMC 18.44.010 Relation to Developed Areas is requested. 2. All require relaxations must be requested or the project must comply with the regulations. The "Response to PreApplication Comments" indicates that you will be requesting a relaxation to Section 18.42.100.B.3.c Watercourse Setback, but this relaxation has not been formally requested. Please clarify this issue. The Watercourse Setback relaxation is formally requested in the document located in Appendix A of the application binder. 3. 18.78.050.H: A noxious weed management and revegetation plan approved by the district for control of noxious weeds shall be submitted with the preliminary plat application. Your request of undue hardship created by this requirement has been discussed with the Planning Department, and the Department is unable to agree to your request. This is not a new requirement, but a long standing requirement of the Bozeman Municipal Code. I have also discussed the status 1 "Providing resources in Partnership with clients to oc:hiieve their goals" MORRISON IJ MERLE,INC. of your noxious weed plan with the Weed District. The submittal of a plan to the Weed District on July 25, 2006, does not indicate any issue with the Weed District's timely review of the plan. Also, there was an indication that the plan may not be approvable as submitted. The Weed Management Plan ,located in Appendix E of the submittal binder, was approved on September 7 by the Weed District.. 4. 18.78.060.R: Lighting Plan. The submittal includes a lighting plan for the American Federal Savings Bank site, but does not include the subdivision lighting plan as required by this section. A subdivision Lighting Plan is located in Appendix J of the submittal binder. 5. 18.78.080.14: Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72 of this title. As stated in the July 5, 2006, letter, when you resubmit, you must specifically address where these corrections have been made in the application, and if located within the covenants - list the specific section that addresses each individual omission. Attached to this letter is a copy of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for PT Land Subdivision with "tracked changes" turned on for your review. Appendix H contains clean copies of the document. Following is a point-by-point narration of the changes made by PT Land. 18.72.020.B.2. Common Land/Facilities. The legal description of the common land and a description of common facilities. Legal description of the "Common Areas." Updates were made to the legal description of the property contained in Exhibit A. In addition, the term "Common Area" in Section 1.07 of the declaration was amended to to provide that "'Common Area"means Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space, the green space areas along Oak Street and Baxter Lane which are shown on the Plat, and the street rights-of-way which are dedicated to the public by the Plat. 18.72.020.B.3. Enforcement. Persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions, responsibilities and payment of assessments, including the City of Bozeman. Enforcement of the Declaration. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.3 requires that the declaration establish the "Persons or entities entitled to enforce the restrictions, responsibilities and payment of assessments, including the City of Bozeman." The enforcement provisions were included in Section 10.03 of the Declaration, which was entitled "Legal Action." To make this provision easier to find, the name was changed "Enforcement of this Declaration,"and minor clarifications to 2 MORRISON -MMERLE,Wc. the section were made. Article Vlll already contains detailed provisions concerning the enforcement of assessments levied by the Association. 18.72.020.B.4. Perpetual Reservation. Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property. Perpetual reservation of the Common Areas. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.4 requires that the declaration provide for the "Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.5 requires that the declaration provide for "The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.9 requires that the declaration provide for "The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association,"BMC Section 18.72.040.A requires that "If the common areas are deeded to a property owners association, the applicant shall record the proposed documents governing the association at the time of final plat filing," and BMC Section 18.72.040.A.3 requires that "Open space restrictions must be permanent and not for period of years." Anew Section 2.05 was added to the declaration which provides that "Upon the filing of the Plat, Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space parcels, will be transferred by the Developer to the Association. The Association will own and preserve the open space parcels as open space in perpetuity, and the open space parcels will be available for the use and enjoyment of the Owners. The green space areas shown along Oak Street and Baxter Lane on the Plat will be owned by the Owners of the Lots in which the green space areas are located, but the green space areas are dedicated in perpetuity for use as landscaped open space and walkways, and no buildings, parking lots, or other improvements may be constructed in the green space areas without the prior written consent of the Association." The plat itself will dedicate the street rights-of-way to the public. 18.72.020.13.5.Right to Use. The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility. Right to Use. See No 3 Perpetual Reservation of the Common Areas above. 18.72.020.B.8. A mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members Dispute resolution mechanism. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.8 requires that the declaration provide 'A mechanism for resolving disputes among the owners or association members." We have added language to Section 10.03 which provides for efforts to resolve disputes through mediation before filing a lawsuit. 18.72.020.B.9. The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association 3 MORRISON --i MERLE,INC. Perpetual reservation of the Common Areas. BMC Section 18.72.020.B.4 requires that the declaration provide for the "Perpetual reservation and limited use of common property,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.5 requires that the declaration provide for "The right of each property or unit owner to use and enjoyment of any common property or facility,"BMC Section 18.72.020.B.9 requires that the declaration provide for "The conditions and timing of the transfer of ownership and control of land facilities to the association,"BMC Section 18.72.040.A requires that "If the common areas are deeded to a property owners association, the applicant shall record the proposed documents governing the association at the time of final plat filing," and BMC Section 18.72.040.A.3 requires that "Open space restrictions must be permanent and not for period of years." We added a new Section 2.05 to the declaration which provides that "Upon the filing of the Plat, Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space parcels, will be transferred by the Developer to the Association. The Association will own and preserve the open space parcels as open space in perpetuity, and the open space parcels will be available for the use and enjoyment of the Owners. The green space areas shown along Oak Street and Baxter Lane on the Plat will be owned by the Owners of the Lots in which the green space areas are located, but the green space areas are dedicated in perpetuity for use as landscaped open space and walkways, and no buildings, parking lots, or other improvements may be constructed in the green space areas without the prior written consent of the Association." The plat itself will dedicate the street rights-of-way to the public. 18.72.020.C. If the property owners association fails to install or maintain improvements according to approved plans, the City may, at its option, complete construction of improvements and/or maintain improvements in compliance with §18.72.040 and Chapter 18.74, BMC. The City's representative, contractors and engineers shall have the right to enter upon the property and perform such work, and the property owners association shall permit and secure any additional permission required to enable them to do so. The City shall bill the property owners association for any costs associated with the installation or maintenance of improvements. Construction of improvements by the City. BMC Section 18.72.020.0 provides that if the association fails to install or maintain improvements, the city can do so and bill the association. We added language which follows this provision as Sections 6.01(c) and 8.06 of the declaration. 18.72.030.D. The property owners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways, landscaping in street boulevards and/or parks. Maintenance of streets. BMC Section 18.72.030.D requires that "The property owners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of subdivision streets, common open space, centers, pathways, landscaping in street 4 MORRISON �-JJ " MAIERLE,INC. boulevards and/or parks." Sections 6.01-6.04 and Section 6.06 of the Declaration already provide for the maintenance of Common Areas. 18.72.030.E. That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants, and the City Commission. Amendments which must be approved by the City Commission. BMC Section 18.72.030.E provides that the City can require that declarations provide "That any covenant which is required as a condition of the preliminary plat approval and required by the City Commission may not be amended or revoked without the mutual consent of the owners in accordance with the amendment procedures in the covenants, and the City Commission." We added this requirement to the declaration as Section 9.02. After the subdivision receives preliminary plat approval, any provisions required by the City can be specified in this section. 18.72.040 Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee Common area and facility maintenance plan. BMC Section 18.72.040.A requires the declaration to contain various requirements. The declaration already satisfies all of these requirements. Common area and facility maintenance guaranty. BMC Section 18.72.040.B requires the declaration to permit the City to place a lien on lots in the subdivision if the association fails to maintain common area improvements, and the City performs the maintenance. We added a new Section 8.06 to the declaration which complies with those requirements. 6. One binder is incomplete. It appears to be missing the introductory information before Tab A, portions of Tab E, portions of Tab J, and Tabs K and L. The referenced binder is an extra copy and has been omitted from this package. The applicant and Morrison-Maierle looks forward to City Planning input. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. olly kor ik, Projec Manager 5 J �J MORMSON J II MMERLE,INC. Enclosures: 28 Preliminary Plat/PUD Application Binders CD of Application cc: Jerry Perkins, Land Owner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI 6 • PT LAND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/ MAJOR SUBDIVISION SUBMITTAL July 2006 Revised September 2006 • Prepared by. Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 3011 Palmer Street Missoula, MT 59808 • MMI#:3948.004 • r • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................1 1.2 REVIEW PROCESS OVERVIEW................................................................................6 1.3 PROJECT PHASING...................................................................................................9 1.4 IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENTS..............................................................................9 1.5 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION................................................ .................................12 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT..........13 2.1 SURFACE WATER...................................................................................................13 2.1.1 Mapping.............................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Description .........................................................................................................13 2.1.3 Water Body Alteration........................................................................................13 2.1.4 Wetlands ........................................................................_.............................. ....13 2.2 FLOODPLAIN ............................................................................................................14 2.3 GROUNDWATER .....................................................................................................14 2.3.1 Depth.................................................................................................................14 2.3.2 Steps to Avoid Degradation .....................................:..........................................15 2.4 GEOLOGY—SOILS—SLOPES................................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Geologic Hazards..............................................................................................15 2.4.2 Protective Measures..........................................................................................15 2.4.3 Topography.......................................................................................................15 2.4.4 Soils Map........................................................................ ...................................15 2.4.5 Cuts and Fills.......................................................... ................................ ..........17 2.5 VEGETATION...........................................................................................................17 2.6 WILDLIFE..................................................................................................................17 2.7 HISTORICAL FEATURES.........................................................................................18 2.8 AGRICULTURE.........................................................................................................18 2.9 AGRICULTURAL WATER USER FACILITIES ..........................................................18 2.10 WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL...........................................................18 2.10.1 Water Supply......................................................................................................18 2.10.2 Sewage Disposal...............................................................................................19 . 2.10.3 Solid Waste Disposal..........................................................................................19 i 0 0 2.11 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT.............................................................................19 • 2.12 STREETS, ROADS AND ALLEYS ....................................................................:.......19 2.13 UTILITIES .................................................................................................................30 2.14 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES.....................................................................................30 2.15 LAND USE................................................................................................................30 2.16 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES..................................................................32 2.17 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PLAN...........................................................................32 2.18 LIGHTING PLAN.......................................................................................................32 2.19 MISCELLANEOUS....................................................................................................32 3 PUD APPLICATION...............................................................................................33 3.1 PUD SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 18.78.120, B)................................33 3.1.1 Document Requirements...................................................................................33 3.1.2 Site Plan Requirements.....................................................................................37 3.1.3 Supplemental Plan Requirements......................................................................37 3.2 INTENT OF PUD (RESPONSE TO 18.36.010, BMC)................................................39 3.3 PUD CRITERIA (RESPONSE TO 18.36.090.E.2, BMC) ...........................................44 3.3.1 All Development Criteria....................................................................................44 3.3.2 Commercial PUD Required Criteria ...................................................................46 3.4 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES.................................................................................48 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Phasing Schedule........................................................................................................10 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................................4 Figure2 Aerial Photo..................................................................................................................5 Figure3 Street Sections ...........................................................................................................26 Figure 4 Private Drive Option 1 .................................................................................................27 Figure 5 Private Drive Option 2.................................................................................................28 Figure 6 Private Drive Option 3.................................................................................................29 • ii • i LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Applications, Checklists and Relaxation Requests Appendix B Platting Certificate and Adjacent Property Owners List Appendix C Affected Agency Letters and Responses Appendix D NRCS Soils Information Appendix E Approved Noxious Weed Management Plan Appendix F Wetlands Report Appendix G Traffic Impact Study Appendix H Covenants and Development Guidelines Appendix I Sign Package Appendix J Drawings ■ Preliminary Plat ■ Preliminary PUD Plan and American Federal Bank Site Plan ■ Landscape Plans ■ Architectural Drawings Appendix K Response to Pre-application Comments • Appendix L Stormwater Master Plan and Supplemental Information • iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed PT Land Subdivision consists of a phased 18-lot major subdivision together with a commercial planned unit development (PUD) in Bozeman, Montana. The PT Land subdivision will consist of five phases. Each phase has specific improvements required to serve the phase. The 46.7 acre parcel (gross) is located north of Oak Avenue, south of Baxter Lane, west of North 11th Avenue and east of North 15'h Avenue. The project location is shown in Figures 1 thru 3. This project is located in portions of the Oak Street and Interstate 90 Entryway Corridors as defined in 18.30.030 of the City of Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC). This designation requires a reservation of 30 percent open space. The total percentage of open space provided by the preliminary site plan for this project exceeds 30%, excluding building perimeters and landscaped islands. Much of the open space is concentrated in the northwest and northeast corners of the project in the form of stream/ditches and associated wetlands. The balance of the open space is distributed in and around the development to provide the public with useable open space including the landscaped greenway along Oak Street. In particular, the open space • area adjacent to the Walton Stream-Ditch and along Baxter Lane will be developed with a trail system for the public to enjoy. Landscaping and open space will soften the appearance of the subdivision. Landscaping along Oak Street shall comply with the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Entryway Guidelines. Landscaping along Baxter Lane shall comply with the Interstate 90 Corridor Entryway Guidelines. All other landscaping shall adhere to the BMC.. Several measures are planned to reduce real or perceived visual impacts. These measures include locating all utilities underground; limiting light pole height to that permitted by code with recessed fixtures to avoid excessive glare; and including color and style in the building design guidelines to be approved by the City of Bozeman. For the purposes of this report, the term "Applicant' shall refer to PT Land, the entity and/or person with administrative control over the property affected by this planned unit development. The landowner is Jerry Perkins. • 1 __ The submitted site plan and preliminary plat provide, in combination, all of the site and adjacent property information requested in the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. Additionally, all of the development guidelines including covenants, building design guidelines, lighting guidelines, signage guidelines and landscaping guidelines are included. The Applicant and Landowner desire to secure approval of the phased subdivision, the overarching PUD and the First American Bank site plan. Filing of subsequent subdivision phases shall be subject to state and local regulations. Development of subsequent lots shall require site plan approval through the City of Bozeman. • 2 r - Sol- r • 1 - 4700 f, •` l� �e - Trc;/�h ` T� 47Z8T 179dT 4 Park 1 �r- • • 1 PROJEd SIT • f i BRIDGER KENYO ?Ilset� ' j ECENT R NOBLE , r- f y- 3 • LUMBE ¢ _ Gll T 1 I S_T �1K ST IT ;i •• - ��_.ic 1 1 t .•• • 9? ST - Ex- t Ti i o Pa f k o I I '476BAT� I j z _" • 1 ! 1 Ik S 41 9rosiod , I � t ' f • • i if ■ �•� I� rn 1 i � . • (_1 I � ~� F•era �~"� `'=` f1 • : /� �' 1iPF>' '� : fJ.~ � f.��Y:. `e Y.< ,a�'� :% i'rj� �i:'1� C,� "rr4.� •.�r ., �•� / r "- yii f +�� � 1b..�{,'�� vkr t i.,� ,�w;a :;f� ,r;y } ( r ( • • 1 l,) ?"�� ' ': • ?,'f �;S�i�h+� �r � ^� ,Ja�3 ✓vr L,� :1 .-r. ia' .cy I • • • � ,J �� `• �f It FJ �A%ti �' \ �'- '��+ '�. L .I .—.i Ir I• : � r � ��j a' � �t`yt. � '�`'�.'' ;lip .`�: r�,rj;,'`ixf3 �� !e v`' sr:, k�j t< ,V �: �`�, •-. T'''. �' :ti • • • • � rl • • •j � � .�<'� J: a— _�i ,,,wwwyyy rt'\.:/Y,•' .1.\S:%' �C;• i w,� .y; ,�.A r • 9�2 4 7r • 1 • � f s �i'�o� � JwJ'. a;��:• i�T 3,.��r y�l •jti��' k` �r � :;n '•I•r• 'r', 4 / F�l a C sr / �F� ,J y ! .fir l '—�`�,---1�.�rr.�.r.Y /{ \ay ,�iyi\ pp< '� \ 'Sf � i • •�,tr,.r '�V'��r" I• ; ,�N � r Tr'' ��t[t �. ,. .G, 4] ;;t' �/ •4 �: bpi` `7,:;;,�f:{• � rl.• 1i:t►/ Y• -. �ti,.1.� • 1 • �•i.�(,,�� �^ �. ,S•J - � afire �i•�� a, �l� %� �"'�� �� ':`r'� +r'" '>iy •.;\1, :y• i, �.r.• s tl `��' �l: ' frfa ?1' ;;� 1 ' - n�•1 %a r- ti Y r>>i r y i'� r� F ., -.J \r� 41 w. �..1 :J3� �, ilh �' \ {�`T N.!' �: ;•�Tji,{ �F, f O J I� �4 `.Vr ,fiJ •�( r 4 .; l • • I yl a' � �� sf� r•� .�� rr • t �� �'r Y Y r RRISON � FIGURE 1 PT LAND a 1 • +� r A, �.�.......•.� 1 � �T.,�,„�1115 VICINITY MAP • • • • • I V ie �` '4 PLOTTED DAIS 11 2WG • • • • >T \i ;ti iEl0 wo w•N/A DALE 0•/0•/D• sw JL: DRAYN BM WD mur NfS p1A1wNG NAME CHECKED BY:Y95_ PIIQI JWs.00a 91E �Qi 1_ GRAPHIC SCALE IXa..a-a%pt._ ` to rya 2.0 500 r IN FEET ) _ ` •' 1 inch = 500 ft. r. 490 PZEM 'BOUNDARY14, ` r r T TSCHACHE LANE X J .+ ( rr _ ' 7 PATRICK STREET ) , I� Lam:, � �•�+ F 1 -— — — --— —— -- — - r r �- r--T To .t{� y•�`^1� '4� ' K ON-NOBLE a \ / �.• LUMBER x 1 BRIDGER PEAKS. f .TOWN CENTER% INA .t~' 1. r h t" _'C�. • '^ � 11 r-� - -� ,� fluJ�Nurn I �. . M ,/ r. , WEST OAK STREET ''' _ J ✓ L ►•t"'I fir— ••��i ��!\��•�` ,.,..yam, �fy ry\� I CI RRISON �g-� "•s � — .�; I r RLE ITIc. — FIGURE 2 (� fc/-c • .ty� — ,+�5' ...rr..:.. — PT LAND AERIAL � cuENrAMN!'PraK•Lc .� r �t • O4/OY/06 FIELD gDp1CN/A DATE PLOTTED OATS Sp/1./Z005 j ORAMttIG NAYS �. •......•�iS}"•�' A.! _ - Lr DRAWN BY SCALE I'-AW M\m" Wd,.,arVwLanoww f� CHECKED BYiE15 — PROJ SHEET 1 or 1.2 REVIEW PROCESS OVERVIEW The application is for Approval of Initial Phase of the PUD — With Subsequent Phases Master Planned and Subject to Development Guidelines as provided for in 18.36.070, BMC. The project has received Concept Plan review. Approval is requested for the preliminary plat via subdivision review, and the PUD master plan and developmental guidelines via PUD zoning review. The PUD zoning review is being requested for the phased project under the procedures outlined in the BMC, which allows for approval of the initial phases of a project and the approval of a project master plan with development guidelines that control the development character of future phases. Preliminary approval is requested for the 18 lots proposed in Phases I through S via the subdivision review process. The Lot 1, Block 9 is intended for a hospitality use (hotels, resort, etc.) with two adjoining open space lots while the remaining 15 lots are intended for retail sales, wholesale sales, and service businesses. The design and character of the buildings are defined by the site plan, the landscaping plan and the developmental guidelines. The approved PUD, including the development guidelines, will control future development of these lots/phases. Because of the project's location within the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street and Interstate 90 Entryway Corridors, it is subject to a higher level of review than many projects. The site is subject to review requirements from each of the following: • The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan • The North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan • The City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) • Design Objectives Plan for Entryway Corridors The North 19fh Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan requires that this project undergo PUD review. Additionally, this project requests the following variances and Bozeman City Council actions. A detailed breakdown of the requests are located in Appendix A of this application package. • 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards: A variance to construct North 15th Avenue to a collector standard within a 65-foot easement between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. A 42-foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb section is proposed 6 with sidewalk on the east side only. This request is based on the City of Bozeman's decision to terminate North 15'h Avenue at Tschache Lane and to construct a 65-foot wide collector standard versus a 90-foot collector as shown in the City's current transportation master plan update. The existing portion of North 15th Avenue between Oak Street and Patrick Street was previously approved to this variance standard in the Bridger Peaks PUD. • The applicant, PT Land is requesting concurrent construction of infrastructure improvements and issuance of building permits via Section 18.74, BMC. The applicant desires to enter into an improvements agreement with the City to permit the filing of the Final Plat and the Final Site Plan to begin concurrent construction of Building 1 and the infrastructure improvements for Lot 1 (= Phase 1..) • The applicant is requesting an exemption to subdivision and infrastructure review by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). This request does not affect DEQ review for permits not strictly related to the water and sewer infrastructure. These permits might include stream turbidity (3A) permits and Stormwater Discharge permits. • 18.44.080.A General: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a meandering 10-foot asphalt trail rather than a City standard concrete sidewalk on the south side of Baxter Lane. It is further requested that a sidewalk/trail not be constructed on the north side of Baxter Lane, which is adjacent to Interstate 90. • 18.44.010.13 Relation to Developed: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a 30-foot wide private drive to serve as the connector between Tschache Lane and Baxter Road in lieu of a public road. Three private access road options are included to show possible scenarios depending upon the development pattern in Block 4. Each option acts as a public road with direct connection between Baxter and Tschache and connections to adjacent parking provided by driveways. 7 0 0 • 18.44.010 E Dead-End Streets: Request is to allow Tschache Lane to be terminated east of Walton's Stream/Ditch. See Section 2.12 of this report for a full description of the request. • 18.42.040.B Block Length: The block lengths will conform to existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties, therefore our request is to permit the establishment of blocks exceeding 400 feet in length. We are also requesting that Block 4 be permitted to exceed 1320 feet in length due to its irregular shape, the presence of extensive wetlands along two watercourses and the desire to maintain a single consolidated parcel that has been designated as a site for hospitality/convention center uses. Larger lots with single and multiple uses already exist on the adjoining properties and this relaxation will not cause any harm to the public welfare. Additionally Block 4 will be served by 4 trails and at least one private access drive. • 18.42.040.E Block Width: The block widths will conform to existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties, therefore our request is to permit the establishment of blocks exceeding 400 feet in width. • 18.42.040.D Rights-of-Way for Pedestrians: The block lengths will conform to existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties. Our request therefore is to permit the establishment of Block 3 which exceeds 600 feet without a pedestrian right-of-way. • 18.42.100.B.6.a Watercourse Setback: We are requesting a relaxation of the definition of Zone 1 and Zone 2 to permit the installation of storm water detention ponds into a portion of Zone 1. We are intending to construct within the 50-foot setback to the wetlands that border the watercourses, but comply with the underlying Zone 1 adjacent to the watercourses, maintaining a 30-foot separation • from the stream/ditches. 8 • 18.42.100.B.3.c Watercourse Setback: The request is to reduce the setback from the actual watercourse 50 to 35 feet along Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane to allow for the routing of North 151h Avenue. In keeping with open space requirements set forth by the City of Bozeman, at least 30% of the site will be retained for open space and shall be appropriately landscaped by a landscape architect familiar with the City's requirements. Shelly Engler of Cashman's Nursery has provided the Landscape Development Guidelines (Appendix H) and Landscape Plan (Appendix J). 1.3 PROJECT PHASING The PT Land Subdivision will be developed in five phases. The phase boundaries are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan in Appendix J. Subdivision improvement.agreements will be requested in accordance with the BMC to allow filing of the Final Site Plan and Final Plat(s), issuance of building permits and concurrent construction of the improvements. In general, the development schedule will follow the proposed phasing. Construction is anticipated to begin in the spring of 2007, with occupancy of Lot 1 in late 2007. The remaining lots will be developed in subsequent phases. Infrastructure improvements including drainage, water, sewer and parking will be installed as needed by the phasing and construction sequence. Landscaping of the open space setbacks along streets and interior parking islands, and installation of pedestrian circulation facilities will be completed as needed for each phase. Landscaping of the building pad and open space areas will be completed along with the construction of the individual structures. Table 1 outlines the general sequence anticipated for installation of improvements. 1.4 IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENTS Improvements agreements in accordance 18.74, Improvements and Guarantees will be required for the proposed development. Following preliminary approval, the specifics and timing of required site and infrastructure improvements will be coordinated with the City Planning and Engineering Departments. • 9 0 Table 1 Phasing Schedule Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Patrick Street between North 10 Avenue and North 151h Avenue. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between.Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Water connection to Tschache Lane system to include Block 1 Pressure Reducing Station in access road on north side of Lot 1 1 (bank site), Block 1. Lots 1-5 • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe through Phase 1 to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Temporary swale may be installed through Block 2 and Block 4. • Tschache Lane between North 15th Avenue and North 14th Avenue. • North 151h Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. Block 2 • Water service provided by connection to Tschache Lane for Lot 4 2, Block 2. Lot's 1, 3 and 9, Block 2 connect to extensions Lots 1-4 constructed during Phase I. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch on Lot 2, Block 4. Pipe to extend to south boundary of Block 2. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Block 3 alternative eliminates main between Lots 4 & 5 if Phase 1 2 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements Lots 1-3 or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 2. Temporary swale may be installed through a portion of Block 2 and Block 4. • 10 Phase Lot Proposed Improvements • Tschache Lane improvements between North 141h Avenue and North 11 th Avenue. • North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Sewer improvements within Tschache Lane and within North 14th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Patrick Street. • Main extensions from Tschache Lane water system. Stand Block 3 alone alternative is to extend mains between Lots 4 & 5 and 3 Lots 5 & 6, Block 3 to serve Lots 1 — 3, Block 3. Dependent Lots 4-6 alternative eliminates main between 4 & 5 if Phase 1 improvements already in place. All mains to be in easements or roadways. • Regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. • Storm water collector pipe to regional detention pond adjacent to Mandeville Creek on Lot 3, Block 4. Pipe to serve all of Phase 3, Block 3). • Baxter Lane improvements adjacent to subject property. • Tschache Lane improvements between North 15th Avenue and Block 4 North 111h Avenue. 5 • Water to be pulled from Tschache System and looped through Lots 1-3 Lot 1 Block 4. • Regional detention facilities, in Lots 2 and 3, Block 4. • Sewer connection to Baxter Lane sewer to serve Block 4, Lot 1 • only. 11 1.5 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This application is organized as a single document to minimize the duplication of information required for the 18-lot major subdivision, zoning PUD, First American Bank site plan and entryway district applications. The objective is to create one cohesive application. The information required in the Environmental Assessment/Community Impact Statement (EA/CIS) per BMC 18.78.060 is presented first. This information is followed by narration and graphics that respond to the requirements of PUD review. Where appropriate, the narration involving the PUD application refers back to specific sections in the EA/CIS. A specific application and narration for a Certificate of Appropriateness in an entryway corridor, BMC 18.30, Entryway Overlay District, will not be provided separately. The issues and concerns addressed in BMC 18.30, Entryway Overlay District, have all been addressed within the PUD proposal. Several appendices consisting of applications and design reports are referenced throughout the document. Specifically, the applicant's responses to Preapplication Plan review comments are included in Appendix K and PUD application and checklist and preliminary plat application checklist and the "Relaxation Requests" are located in Appendix A. Other supplemental documents required by the City of Bozeman include adjacent property owners list and affected agency letters and responses. These documents are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. The platting certificate is located in Appendix B. • 12 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT • 2.1 SURFACE WATER 2.1.1 Mapping The subject property contains two surface water features: Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek. Walton's Stream/Ditch runs along the northern portion of the western boundary of the subject property. Mandeville Creek runs along the northern portion of the eastern edge of the subject property. Both Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek are shown on the Preliminary Site Plan located in Appendix J. 2.1.2 Description Walton's Stream/Ditch is the result of Walton's Ditch and Farmer's Canal merging to the west of the intersection of North 15th Avenue with Oak Street. The convergence of these two hydrologic sources marks the terminus of the Farmer's Canal. The channel that continues is designated as a "stream/ditch combination" and is referred herein as Walton's Stream/Ditch. Walton's Stream/Ditch flows north under Interstate-90 and confluences with Mandeville Creek. Mandeville Creek is tributary to the East Gallatin River. All construction, including buildings, sewer systems and streets, generally meet the set back 50 feet from Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek water courses setback requirements to facilitate construction of these facilities. The exceptions are portions of North 15th Avenue, the storm water detention facilities and the build out of Tschache Lane. 2.1.3 Water Body Alteration No alteration of water bodies are thought necessary at this time. Alterations may be required by regulatory agencies to complete the crossing of Walton's Stream/Ditch and connect to North 15th Avenue on Tschache Lane. 2.1.4 Wetlands A wetlands investigation for the subject property was completed in 2005. This investigation resulted in the delineation of seven wetlands. The total acreage of the seven wetlands is approximately 6.36 acres. Six of the seven wetlands are jurisdictional based on their hydrologic connection to waters of the U.S. The seventh wetland is considered "likely jurisdictional", with • the ultimate decision to be made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers field staff. For this 13 • 0 project the seventh wetland is being treated as jurisdictional.. For further information see the project wetlands report in Appendix F. 2.2 FLOODPLAIN The proposed project is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated floodplain. The Flood Rate Insurance Map (FIRM) covering the project area is Panel # 30002800007C which was not printed by FEMA, indicating that no floodplain study was completed in this area. The engineer's design project report and construction documents will address potential flooding along the previously mentioned water courses during the design of infrastructure and buildings. 2.3 GROUNDWATER 2.3.1 Depth Information obtained from the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG) Groundwater Well Information Center (GWIC) and previous site experience indicates groundwater depths in the project area are shallow. Static water levels from wells adjacent the project site range from 3 feet to 12 feet below ground surface. Additional sources utilized in determining groundwater levels for the project area include the following: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, for Bridger Peaks Village (Maxim Technologies, Inc. June 2003) and Final Phase Remedial Investigation Report, Bozeman Solvent Site (Nicklin, Earth, and Water, Inc. February 1998). Both reports tested soils in close proximity to the present project and provide relevant and representative groundwater data. The first report utilized data from a series of drill holes on the Bridger Peaks Village site. The test holes revealed ground water at a depth of 3.5 to 4.0 feet throughout the development. The second report analyzed monitoring well data to determine the hydraulic gradient for the adjacent Bridger Peaks Town Center. This analysis concluded the local water table slopes to the north. Minimum recorded depths to the water table occurred in June 1994 with depths below ground surface of 7 feet along North 19th Avenue and 1.5 feet along what is now North 15th Avenue. Maximum recorded depths to the water table occurred in October 1997 with depths below ground surface of 11 feet along North 191h Avenue and 5.5 feet along what is now North 15th Avenue. 14 2.3.2 Steps to Avoid Degradation Because the PT Land Subdivision will be serviced by municipal sewer connections, traditional septic tank and drainfield systems are not required. Therefore, the threat of groundwater degradation from onsite sewage disposal is nonsignificant. 2.4 GEOLOGY— SOILS —SLOPES 2.4.1 Geologic Hazards According to Section 1113.0, Eatherquake Load, of the B.O.C.A. National Building Code, 1990 Edition, this property is located within Seismic Zone 3, which generally corresponds to Seismic Design Category D of the 2000 International Building Code (IBC). Seismic zones are ranked from 1 to 4 with Seismic Zone 0 having the lowest earthquake potential and Zone 4 having the greatest earthquake potential. 2.4.2 Protective Measures Buildings will be designed to withstand earthquake loads in accordance with all applicable regulations. Additionally, all utilities will be buried, reducing the risk of property damage or personal injury in the event of a catastrophe. 2.4.3 Topography Based on the NAVD 88 vertical datum, site topography gradually drops from approximately 4738 feet in the. southeast to 4708 feet in the northwest, with slopes averaging 1.1 percent. There are no slopes exceeding 15 percent. 2.4.4 Soils Map Soils information from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) indicates that the site has four different soils types. These soil types and their approximate distribution are listed below. NRCS soils information and a soils map is provided in Appendix D. Soil Type Acres Percentage Of Site Blackdog Silt Loam 15.0 32 Saypo Silt Loam 17.0 36 Enbar Loam 10.5 23 Blossber9 Loam 4.2 9 15 The Blackdog soil unit is a well-drained, silty loam derived from calcareous loess. In the project area, it occurs on old stream terraces with 0 to 4 degree slopes. The Saypo Silt Loam also occurs on old stream terraces with slopes from 0 to 2 percent. The Saypo soil unit is somewhat poorly-drained and is derived from a loamy alluvium parent material. The Enbar Loam was deposited in a floodplain geologic environment. The Enbar unit occurs on slopes of 0 to 4 percent and is somewhat poorly-drained. The Blossberg Loam is a poorly drained, hydric soil with a seasonally high water table. In the project area, the Blossberg Loam is localized near the Walton Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek. The native soils present physical constraints to development that is typical in the Bozeman area. Both the silt loam and loam soil types within the project area present moderate development limitations. The Blackdog loam presents moderate limitations due to its low strength, potential for frost action, and the presence of compressive clays. The Blossberg loam also presents limitations due to potentially high groundwater and moderate shrink-swell potential. • All of the limitations described above have been dealt with successfully on past projects with the use of accepted engineering practices. Typical mitigation efforts for these soil characteristics include excavating out the undesirable soil until gravel is reached when installing the building footings. The contractor will be expected to adhere to specific foundation design criteria as identified in the geotechnical investigation findings. Criteria shall include provisions for pier/footing design by a professional engineer based on site-specific soils information. Design of storm water drainage facilities will consider different soil types, plant species, and the potentially shallow water table. Additionally, specific design considerations are given to the stream/ditch corridor design. Design of all streets and parking lots will follow accepted engineering practices to determine structural sections and the use of separation fabrics based on soil conditions and traffic requirements. Well points will be used to dewater the site during construction to insure that underground • utilities, building foundations and pavement structural sections are properly constructed to prevent settlement or failure. 16 2.4.5 Cuts and Fills Due to the proximity of Walton's Stream-Ditch and the presence of high groundwater, cuts over 3-feet are not planned for this site. On the other hand, fills greater than 3-feet are anticipated. All significant fill sections will be graded and then compacted to engineered specifications. Topsoil will be placed in fill sections located in open space areas and reseeded to reduce erosion. Best Management Practices (BMPs), including silt fences, will be utilized to reduce erosion. Please reference the Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan located in Appendix J to see existing versus proposed contour information. 2.5 VEGETATION The 46.7-acre subject property is dominantly comprised of grain cropland and grassland pasture. Upland species include wheatgrass, quackgrass, spotted knapweed, and dandelion. In addition, areas-of wetland vegetation were found along the two riparian corridors. Wetland species include reed canary grass, field mint, beaked sedge, and broad-leaf cattail. The riparian corridors will be retained as open space. The goal is to have the stream/ditch • resemble a true stream corridor. This objective will be met, in part, by the landscaping plan of the present project. 2.6 WILDLIFE The project area does not serve as a critical game range nor does it currently support any observable endangered species. The site's history of agricultural use and intermittent/seasonal hydrology sources, limit the quantity and variety of wildlife. The goal is to increase the wildlife variety and sustainability by retaining open space and enhancing the existing riparian corridor. Impacts are to be mitigated through the preservation and enhancement of riparian corridors in accordance with the applicable NRCS 310 permits, Army Corps of Engineers 404 permits, and comments from the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. A letter soliciting comment from Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks (FWP) was sent in April 2006 regarding this project. The FWP comments were to minimize any activity near surface waters and avoid situations that might deliver pollutants to surface waters. i I 17 2.7 HISTORICAL FEATURES During the initial development of PT Land PUD, the Montana Historical Society was contacted for information on cultural resources on or near the project site. According to the Montana Historical Society, there have been no previously recorded historical sites in the project area. The absence of any cultural properties in the area does not mean that they do not exist but rather may reflect to absence of any previous cultural resource inventory in the area. The Montana Historical Society believes there is a low likelihood cultural properties will be impacted by the present project and feels a recommendation for a cultural resource inventory is unwarranted. However, if cultural materials are encountered during construction, a qualified cultural resource specialist will be contacted for their recommendation. A correspondence letter from the Montana Historical Society is found in Appendix C. 2.8 AGRICULTURE The current project encompasses 40 acres of what is now agricultural land. The projects four soil types are not listed among the Bozeman Area soil types most suitable for agriculture in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. • 2.9 AGRICULTURAL WATER USER FACILITIES Mandeville Creek and Walton's Stream/Ditch are the hydrologic sources in the project area that serve this function. The ability of these courses to transfer water to downstream users will be protected. Release of detained stormwater will not affect downstream properties or agricultural facilities. 2.10 'WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL 2.10.1 Water Supply Water for domestic use, irrigation and fire protection will be provided through connection to the City of Bozeman Public Water System. Pressure reducing valves may be necessary at a few water service connections within the development to control excessive pressures. As shown on the Preliminary PUD Plan, a connection from the Oak Street pressure zone Tschache Lane pressure zone. This connection includes a pressure reducing station near Lot 1, Block 1. From there, the proposed water main runs north through the center of Block 1, east along Patrick Street and the north in North 10 Avenue to the tie-in at Tschache Lane. 18 0 . • 2.10.2 Sewage Disposal . Sewage from PT Land Subdivision will be disposed of via gravity sewer connected to the City of Bozeman Municipal Wastewater System. The gravity main will collect wastewater from each building within the PUD and gravity flow into a main Icoated within North 14th.Avenue and Tschache Lane. The existing main is 8-inches in diameter, 2.10.3 Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste generated by the PT Land Subdivision will be collected by Allied Waste Services. Allied Waste Services currently provides commercial garbage service in the immediate vicinity of this proposed subdivision. They foresee no problem in providing service to the businesses located within this proposed subdivision. A correspondence letter from Allied Waste Services is found in Appendix C. Prior to collection, solid waste will be staged in trash enclosures. The trash enclosures will be constructed to development guideline standards. 2.11 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Reference Appendix L for the Stormwater Management Plan. 2.12 STREETS, ROADS AND ALLEYS Description Road installation and improvements will be required to service the proposed lots and to move the public through the subdivision in a controlled and uniform method. Roads are designed in accordance to the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001, and other associated corridor plans. Access to the subdivision will be from Oak Street, North 111h Avenue and Baxter Lane. Roads internal to the subdivision include North 14th Avenue, Patrick Street, North 15th Avenue and Tschache Lane. Road and intersection improvements and their impacts are included in the following discussion. North 15th Avenue The subdivision is accessible from the south via North 15th Avenue and North 14th Avenue. North 15th Avenue currently extends from Oak Street and ends in a cul-de-sac two blocks north. There are existing sidewalks on the west side of North 15th Avenue. The improvements to North 15th Avenue include adding a sidewalk to the east side of the existing road, removing the cul-de-sac and continuing the road northward to Tschache Lane. 19 The new portion of North 15tn Avenue will have sidewalks installed on the east side of the road only. The extension to North 15tn Avenue will follow the existing road as approved in the Bridger Peaks Village PUD. The existing portion of North 15tn Avenue has a 42-foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb asphalt section, 5.5-foot boulevards, and a 5-foot sidewalk on.the west side. A 5- foot wide sidewalk will be added to the east side of North 15tn Avenue. Planned curb cuts along the east side of the existing North 15tn Avenue will provide entrances to Block 1. Two entrances for Lot 1 will enable the parking lot to the bank to be separate from the drive-thru. The balance of the lots accessing North 15tn Avenue are planned for single driveways only but this may be modified during site plan review given that they meet the development requirements within the BMC. The extension to North 15tn Avenue will terminate at a "Tee" intersection with Tschache Lane. North 15tn Avenue will deviate to the east to avoid impacts to Walton's Stream/Ditch. The alignment shown will generally create a buffer between Walton's Stream/Ditch and the road surface. North 14 to Avenue North 14tn Avenue currently extends two blocks north from Oak Street to the intersection with Patrick Street. Block 1 lies west of North 14tn Avenue while Kenyon-Noble Lumber lies to the east. North 14tn Avenue has a current asphalt width of 35 feet from back-of-curb to back-of- curb, 6.5-foot boulevards and 5-foot wide sidewalks on both sides. The improvements to North 14tn Avenue include extending the current road profile north to intersect with the future Tschache Lane. This extension will allow access to Blocks 2 and 3. A private road will continue north of Tschache Lane through Lot 1 Block 4 connecting Tschache Lane with Baxter Lane. Patrick Street Patrick Street is one of two east-west streets that provide access to the subdivision. Patrick Street currently extends from North 11tn Avenue to North 14tn Avenue. This three-block stretch of road currently provides access to Kenyon Noble.Lumber and will provide access to Lots 1, 2 and 3 Block 3 of the PT Land Subdivision. 20 The improvements to Patrick Street include extending the current road profile west to intersect with North 151h Avenue. The existing road profile consists of a 35-foot back-of-curb to back-of- curb width along with 6.5-foot wide boulevards and 5-foot wide sidewalks. Tschache Lane The second east-west road serving the subdivision is the proposed Tschache Lane. Tschache Lane currently exists as a signalized intersection at North 191h Avenue that provides access to Home Depot to the west and to Bridger Peaks Town Center and Lowe's to the east of North 19th Avenue. This project intends to construct Tschache Lane as part of Phases 3 or 4: In accordance with Section 18.66.070A, we are requesting a variance to the following: Section 18.44.010 E. Dead-End Streets. Tschache Lane shall be terminated in a dead-end near the west property line. The Landowner is willing to enter into an agreement with the adjoining landowner, Philip Saccoccia, Jr., to cause Tschache Lane to be extended to the west and to construct the crossing of Waltons Stream-Ditch. The cost of construction of the roadway would be shared on a pro-rata frontage basis with the cost of the bridge/culvert crossing shared on a .50-50 basis. The Landowner cannot, without the cooperation of the adjoining landowner cause Tshcache Lane to be extended across Walton Stream-Ditch and therefore is requesting relief from this section. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to public health and safety or injurious to other property owners. Turn-around access is provided at the connection of North 15th Avenue with Tschache Lane. The variance, if granted, will not increase public costs since the Landowner's will pay for their share of the construction of Tschache Lane. The lack of necessary easements and the proximity of the Walton Stream-Ditch form the basis of this request. With the City of Bozeman's blessing, the Landowner will work toward development of an agreement and a plan to extend Tschache Lane which may include the creation of an SID to accomplish this purpose. 21 Private Access Road in Block 4 A 30-foot wide private access street is proposed to connect Tschache Lane with Baxter Lane. The preferred alternatives are presented in Figures 4, 5 and 6. The preferred alternative Option 1, connects North 19th Avenue to Baxter Lane. The extension of Tschache Lane will follow the road profile of the existing Tschache Lane east of North 19th Avenue. The existing profile consists of a 37-foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb driving surface with 5.5-foot boulevards and 5-foot sidewalks. The proposed extension will have a sidewalk on the south side of the road only. A trail system on the north side of Tschache Lane will provide pedestrian access along Tschache Lane and connections to Baxter Lane. Tschache Lane will provide access to Blocks 2, 3 and 4. Due to the size of the lots fronting Tschache Lane, multiple entrances may be needed from Tschache Lane. Baxter Lane Baxter Lane, designated a minor arterial, is a 24-foot wide paved road that borders the north end of the PT Land Subdivision. No sidewalks exist along Baxter Lane. Phase 5 will require the buildout of Baxter Lane to a 3-lane minor arterial with bike lanes and curb and gutter. A sidewalk/trail will provide pedestrian access along the south side of Baxter. No sidewalk is proposed on the north side adjacent to 1-90. Access to Arterials by Lots PT Land will not have direct access to arterial roads except for Block 4, which will access Baxter Lane in addition to internal collector streets. Access to arterial roads will be acquired from North 14th and 15th Avenues, from Patrick Street and from Tschache Lane. From these collectors, the public can access Oak Street or North 7th Avenue directly and North 19th Avenue from Oak Street or Baxter Lane. Modification of Existing Streets or Roads Oak Street was widened in anticipation of this project during improvements for the Kenyon Noble facility. As mentioned above, Baxter Lane will be reconstructed to a 3-lane section. Improvements to North 11 th Avenue will include the addition of a sidewalk along the west side between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. A sidewalk currently exists along North 11th • 22 • 0 Avenue between Patrick Street and Oak Street. A trail system through Block 4 will carry pedestrians from Tschache Lane to Baxter Lane. Dust All of the streets, parking lots and private drives proposed for this project are required to be paved, thus dust will not pose a problem upon completion. Dust created during construction will be controlled in accordance with the standard practices described in the Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Handbook. Pollution and Erosion Street maintenance will be performed by the City of Bozeman in accordance with the City's standard operating procedures and maintenance requirements. Any surface runoff will be treated by on-site detention ponds, which will collect runoff from the site as shown on the Grading and Drainage Plan located in Appendix J. The terrain on the proposed site is gentle and erosion is not anticipated to be a problem. Sediments resulting from construction will be controlled in accordance with the standard practices described in the Montana Sediment and Erosion Control Handbook. Control of construction-related dust and sediment accumulations will be required as part of all contracts. Installation and Maintenance All proposed improvements are to be installed by the Applicant with private funds. All internal parking will be serviced and maintained by the individual lot owners. The maintenance of dedicated streets will be provided by the City of Bozeman. Funds generated by street taxes will help finance the City's maintenance costs. Traffic Generation and Capacities See Traffic Impact Study in Appendix G. The recommendations call for the future signalization of N. 15'h Avenue at Oak Street and the monitoring of conditions at the intersection of N. 14'h and Oak Street with possible future improvements at this intersection. As part of the mitigation of increased traffic generated by this project, PT Land agrees to waive their right to protest the creation of SID's to construct the necessary signal improvements at the intersection of N. 15'h Avenue and Oak Street and future intersection improvements at N. 10 Avenue and Oak Street. 23 Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian circulation is addressed through a network of sidewalks and trails within and around the subdivision. These proposed internal sidewalks and trails provide access to the adjacent businesses and trail systems. The internal sidewalks join the perimeter sidewalks that provide access to all of the open spaces within the community and to businesses and amenities along North 19th Avenue. Parkinq Parking will be provided for on a lot-by-lot basis. Off street parking numbers and designed will comply with the BMC. On-street parking shall be discouraged to the greatest practical extent by PT Land PUD. • 24 SOUTH NO R/W R BO' TO 90' (VARIES) NNW CL 7t VARIES 5' BIKE 12' DOUBLE LEFT 5' BIKE t0' TRAIL 11' DRIVING LANE 11' DRIVING LANE BLVD. VARIES LANE TURNING LANE LANE • 0.5' BACK OF I 9 VARIES " (TYP.) S=3% S=3% ln 5 S=2y. CURB (TYP.) 2% NF t�y.>�'N'.�v�if�`� it1 `�v;VL:, :1r2�.�R2:t\'�Y \Y ^yrJ<fifi:�`;Jii,. ;:�'� - �«,`L,`��`i`i s��:%�>��)"1��v��'"\.,.✓.'t''i�� :.s: :?a'.\1'L',:��\,fc'✓.as ✓,i',1>��Y:.\\f�.,N:..rt�t��kCYi.�.,..fi,.rti>r:,:T ... - �:-.= =>-'.�'�.,:J'^'�:,T%-..� v� / .- - .. _... J;" �.ei.� �c��� f'� 7-'c'>\>Y •a'"fir �o-x'`• a:��\ �:> ,,?%`y��s. �\1 t �•fi`�"r"r ` r r Y\j;, `.:C\� �',"�2�' \ (7 •y �, %`. v.,�'`.�: �, j:.- .,'\,:.. .^ v-c, t>l`. v<'t l.`���?:Y1tt`��.1��`,��> 'Y.r' %Sy.\\mot, a�.`.c\��'�Y;. .t��%•%`'��,,.c�.v' .>'-%- .s,R�'N`�,,,�L.a1,1 COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT 6"-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE 1 �" TYPE A CRUSHED BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUB-GRADE SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE BARTER LANE EAST WEST R/W R/W (VARIES) rL 1 42' WIDTH NOTE: 0.5' BACK OF I CURB (TYP.) 19' DRIVING LANE 19' DRIVING LANE 9- (TYP.) 1. PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTIONS SHALL MEET OR 5 5' S.0' 1 0' EXCEED CITY OF BOZEMAN STANDARDS AND WILL ALMOST S=3% S=3% SIDEWALK CERTAINLY REQUIRE FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE. ��.�.,��(� %. \ t%,%Y\F• .r.,;:> _ . . /\'^` ' ;y1s:` �"" ' SECTIONS WILL BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE. n\Y:T?'.r%N%` 'R'.`f'� '\ `>�- `•;�� - -=-�.---cr. �_ _ � .� �--r-�-� � _ _ - 3 � COB STD COB STD CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT 6"-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE 7 1 �' TYPE CRUSHED BASE COURSE y ' COMPACTED SUB-GRADE , SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE NORTH 15TH AVENUE NORTH SOUTH WEST EAST • R/W R/W EASEMENT EASEMENT 64' 30' PRIVATE EASEMENT CL � 37' WIDTH VARIES 0.5' BACK OF 1.0 CURB (TYP.) 16.5' DRIVING LANE 16.5' DRIVING LANE 13.0' DRIVING LANE 13.0' DRIVING LANE B.O' BLVD. F A TRAIL�-VARIES _ 6'STM�-SIDEWALK CURB (TYP) 37" S__3% 5_3 _3% A: i, \ fir ;k ,.. _�, ...,c'-�'_ '- ,�,. '•�r`J��'F ��' �����'T� ��1�-"'���:--:�= �;��JYSC'.. . < � , .-����.���-• _ , -��^�(�3.%"�-'��->. � j w��'�� �-,�' \,%� ,� %, � •_ ' 't %)yY�%�. .�l'Y %�� v�� �Y � � `y, L. � _.,r/� COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT 6"-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE ASPHALT 6"-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE 1 �" TYPE CRUSHED BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUB-GRADE 1 1" TYPE CRUSHED BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUB-GRADE SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE , FUTURE TSCHACHE LANE PRIVATE DRIVE EAST NORTH SOUTH WEST R/W R/W R/W R/W 60' 60! GL I 1 35' WIDTH- 35' WIDTH 1.0' 0.5' BACK OF 1.0' 1.0' 0.5' BACK OF 1.0 CURB (TYP.) 15.5' DRIVING LANE- 15.5' DRIVING LANE CURB (TYP.) 15.5' DRIVING LANE 15.5' DRIVING LANE 9. (TYP.) 5.0' 9" (TYP.) 5.0' 5.0' 6.5' 6.5• S=3% S=3% 6 5 6 5 S=3% S=3% �-SIDEWALK SIDEWALK I - SI DEWALK ALK SIDEWALK \ /1Y �-'�-3'S:j _ �'+C� ,.:,fit:' :. � "�;�'�i��� ''- '......F'l- -.• T� ��c h y ^ Y`✓ ��'-la��_ T,,"^ .li_ Lam'=�L.l-^V�, S \ J- \!, y� �M\C, 1:j �`,%, � � �, COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER COB STD CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT 6'-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE ASPHALT 6"-MINUS SUB-BASE AGGREGATE 1 TYPE CRUSHED BASE COURSE - 1 �' TYPE CRUSHED BASE COURSE .COMPACTED SUB-GRADE COMPACTED SUB-GRADE SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE SEPARATION FABRIC ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE • PATRICK STREET FUTURE N14TH AVENUE VERIFY SCALE! REVISIONS PROJECT NUMBER NO. DESCRIPTION DATE BY '-Z } 306WestR.11,.MSL, DRAWN BY: MJO FIGURES 8.0114 THESE PRINTS MAY BE " CHKD.BY: MRS 386NUM REDUCED.LINE INCH ON MORRIS�N r6i °'y MLssciAae Ml�50002 APPR.BY 'STREET SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER owclNALttEAWwG. I•_N•� -Sw�eyD,e' MRS BOZEMAN MONTANA + �~ MIA MAIERLE INC. DATE: 08/+2/08 DRAWING NUMBER �` PnoOa:(aos)sae BBBo pA.REVIEW PT LAND APPLICATION 1 MODIFY SCALE ACCORDWGLYI A.E-proye-0-nadC-.V qy t, Fax:(406)6a2-000B BY: M:UD,.I IT CROS%cAE%WBI7.Vi0ADSSECRON.077ME.DWG PLOTTEDBY:MOCONNELLONS.WtV2W COPYEGNfCMnEW50N.M�@RLE.M+ 2oDe DATE: `rf 4i„ � ■ rP •�' .u■uouu■n • • O.� p0 • 91 PRIVATE ACCESS RO �� /.C:._ Jet, � � � `f' � �� � ` - ••'• �i� .���■-.__ ... 'I1-�..i+�,�_��,y�iv..1�:�1i:Yl��'9� :•. ���(r\ �` �► se � �-`ems " L(�'_.. ��..N. � S�'9�•••�• •"• �� � y�,y�,.}}T; ' �S �• , _� Q0� ��: . V. Or'I ION 1�\ 1 � t � J65' NOR._ _ W ^'7� 555 6 game 3 (OPEN■ 2.13 UTILITIES Affected Utilities: The utility companies affected by the current project have received preliminary plat drafts of this project for review. The Northwestern Energy Company, Owest Communications, and Bresnan Communications currently provide electric, gas, and telephone service to the adjoining properties and thus, are able to provide services for the current project. A correspondence letter from Northwestern Energy, displaying requested easement and conduit locations is found in Appendix C. It is anticipated that other utility companies will also be able to provide services, such as cable, to this project. Easements are provided in the proposed development to allow for the standard installation of utilities. Utilities may also be placed within the Greenway Corridors and along all subdivision roads. 2.14 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES This development is intended for commercial purposes only. The development will have minimal impact on the school system. • 2.15 LAND USE Planning and Zoning: The project area was annexed into the City of Bozeman corporate limits in 1986. The property was subsequently zoned as a Community Business District (132) and designated as Regional Commercial by the Bozeman 2020 Plan. The intended uses of the PT Land commercial subdivision include financial institutions, retail, office space and guest accommodations. These uses are highlighted as "Principal' use in the B2.Community Business District. The proposed project corresponds with the Bozeman 2020 Plan, the North 19fh Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan, and the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Listed below is a summary of the adjacent uses and their respective master plan designations and zoning classifications. • 30 Location of Adjacent Master Plan Zoning Existing Uses Property Designations North of Site Light Manufacturing M-1 Vacant East of Site Regional Commercial B-2 Vacant and Services Residential/Business Mobile Home Park South of Site Park R-0 & Proposed Residential Subd. Regional Commercial Affordable Senior West of Site and Services B-2 Housing Public Lands: With the exception of public road right-of-way, there are no existing public lands within the project boundary or on adjacent properties. The nearest tracts of public land are located on Oak Street (Rose Park), north of Baxter Lane and east of Simmental Way (State Lands). Access to these public lands will not be affected by the current proposal. • Adjacent Land Use: The area surrounding the current project is in transition from agricultural land use to commercial use as discussed in the Bozeman 2020 Plan. This proposal would be compatible with the Bozeman 2020 Plan and its stated goal of providing a community business district with a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions. Hazards and Nuisances: The current project area and adjacent properties do not contain any naturally occurring hazards or nuisances. The only known hazard for the project area is its location within the Bozeman Solvent Site plume. Research indicates the plume has continued to diminish in intensity with time and distance from the facility. As of 2002, the majority of the project area is within the "less than 5 parts per billion" plume. Contaminants from the plume do not present a hazard to the proposed land uses on the project site; however, excavation for utility trenches and/or building foundations that penetrate ground water levels may require special consideration. During construction of utility trenches along West Oak Street and within Bridger Peaks Town Center, • 31 • i dewatering was safely and successfully conducted. Similar trenching and dewatering techniques would be employed on this site. 2.16 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES Because the project area is zoned within the Community Business District, a park dedication is not required. The project will comply with the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan and the requirements regarding the retention of open space. A portion of this open space corridor is along the Walton's Stream/Ditch , Mandeville Creek and the wetlands along Baxter Lane. Trails are proposed for the open space corridors creating a recreational amenity for the public. The open space would be privately owned and maintained by the owners association. 2.17 NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PLAN This project does not contain a neighborhood center. 2.18 -LIGHTING PLAN See Appendix J for preliminary lighting layout and type of lighting elements. All lighting will comply with the City of Bozeman regulations. This project will also comply with all current street lighting regulations. 2.19 MISCELLANEOUS Public access will be provided through a network of sidewalks and trails. No State lands, City lands or parks will be impacted by this project. Section 2.15 describes the Bozeman Solvent Site, which is the only known hazard at the project site. 32 3 PUD APPLICATION 3.1 PUD SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 18.78.120, B) This section outlines submittal requirements (Document Requirements, Preliminary Site Plan Requirements, and Supplemental Requirements) for preliminary plan submittals. This section follows Section 18.78.120.E of the UDO and follows the PUD checklist. 3.1.1 Document Requirements 1 a. Application forms: The PUD, Site Plan and Preliminary Plat application forms are in Appendix A. 1 b. List of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development: Owner/applicant: PT Land c/o Jerry Perkins 511 N. Wallace Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 1 c. Statement of planning objectives, including: 1 c (1) Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth policy Additional information is provided in Section 3.2, which addresses the requirements of 18.36.010 - Intent of Planned Unit Development. The following table lists goals and objectives from the Bozeman 2020 Plan that this project promotes: 33 • OBJECTIVE DESCRIPTION 4.9.1.3 Entryway corridors Provide pleasing development along Bozeman's entryway corridors. 4.9.1.6 Develop within the City Commercial development within the existing City limits. 4.9.2.6 Integrate Open Lands Over 30% of the project will be open lands including natural areas and greenways. 4.9.4.1 Public Landscaping Landscaping will be in accordance to the North 191h Avenue Entryway Corridor Master Plan, which includes tree-lined streets. 6.6.1.1 Provide Basic Services This project matches the planned Future Land Use and current Zoning. The project will bring services such as banking in close proximity to where people live and work. 6.6.1.3 Minimize Sprawl This infill project provides commercial services adjacent to hospitality and existing commercial areas. 6.6.1.6 Infill Development Commercial development within the City limits next to other commercial complexes. 7.6.1.1 Business Creation This project will create facilities for up to 16 new businesses with the employment of over 100 workers. 8.14.2.1 Protect Natural Wetlands and stream corridors are identified on the project Resources site and will be preserved. 10.8.4.2 Pedestrian Trails Pedestrian trails will be established along the Baxter Lane, and continued along Oak Street, and be constructed through the dominant open space areas. 1 c (2)(a). Statement of proposed ownership for open space: A majority of the proposed open space is located within open space lots and is identified as Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 and will be held in common by the lot owners within PT Land Subdivision. The remaining open space, including the greenway setbacks along Baxter Lane and Oak Street, are under the ownership of the respective adjoining lots. The open space lots identified as Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 will be maintained in common by the property owner's association. Covenants for the PT Land PUD provide a management entity and a maintenance fee 34 • • assessment and collection method for this purpose. The common maintenance of the open space lots, including stormwater detention, trails and landscape features within said open space lots, will be the responsibility of management entity. 1c (2)(b). Applicant's intentions with regard to ownership of all portions of the PUD: The proposed lots would be sold to individual entities. The Applicant's intention is to first develop, or provide for the construction of American Federal Savings Bank, on Lot 1, Block 1. The development of this lot will trigger construction improvements associated with Phase 1. The anticipated construction of this lot is to begin as soon as the approval process allows. Future lots will be developed in subsequent phases. These lots are to be sold to and developed by individual owners. Building design would be controlled by the development guidelines and the covenants and the City's Site Plan review process. 1 c (3). Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and industrial uses: Total number of estimated employees at full build-out will be based on the types of entities • choosing to locate within the project. Retail and wholesale businesses may have less than 10 employees while a hotel/motel may have tens of employees. With 16 developable lots, the project has the capacity to employ more than 100 workers. 1 c (4). Description of the rationale behind assumptions and choices made b the applicant: The design of the proposed PT Land PUD is designed to meet the objectives of the Bozeman Entryway Corridor for North 19fh Avenue and Oak Street, Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, Design Objectives Plan for Entryway Corridors and the Unified Development Ordinance. 1 c (5). Where deviations from the requirements of this title are proposed, the applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of 18.36.090, BMC. The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective and criterion. 35 Deviations and variance are identified in Section 1.2 and Appendix A of this document. Sections 3.2 and 3.3 describe how this project meets applicable community design objectives and criterion. The requested deviations/variances have no significant impacts to the intent of design objectives as they apply to this project. 1 c (6). Description of how conflicts between land uses of different character are being avoided or mitigated: The project proposal complies with the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan, the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan and underlying zoning of the site. There are no land use conflicts on site. Potential conflicts with adjacent uses are addressed in Section 3.3 (PUD Criteria). 1 c (7). Statement of design methods to reduce energy consumption: Building construction will be conducted in accordance with Bozeman building codes and standards appropriate to this climate for insulation thereby minimizing building heating and cooling costs. 1 d. Development schedule indicating approximate date when construction of the PUD can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas: The phasing and development schedule is outlined in Section 1. Construction is anticipated to begin in the Spring of 2007. Full build-out is difficult to estimate but could range from 5 to 10 years. 1e. Reduced versions of drawings: Reduced size drawings have been provided at appropriate locations. Please reference Appendix J for full size and reduced versions of PUD site plan. 36 3.1.2 Site Plan Requirements Information required in 18.78.080, BMC is identified on the Site Plan Checklist, American Federal Savings Bank Site Plan and PT Land PUD Plan. 2a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included where appropriate: Ownership information is provided on preliminary plat. The proposed ownership of American Federal Savings Bank is noted on the Site Plan for that lot. 2b. Proposed treatments on the perimeter of the project site: This is shown on the Landscaping Plan for the PUD and American Federal Savings Bank. In general, landscaping will be provided along all proposed and existing streets. Special attention is placed on landscaping along Oak Street and Baxter Lane. 2c. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership: These are provided on the preliminary plat. In addition, the platting certificate is included as Appendix B of this submittal. 3.1.3 Supplemental Plan Requirements 3a. Viewsheds: The community has addressed this concern by establishment of the entryway corridor regulations, which apply to the site. Adherence to the recommendations and regulations of the entryway corridor are discussed in Section 3.3, in the overall project design and in the development guidelines in Appendix H. The most distinctive view across the site into the surrounding area is the view east towards the Bridger Mountain Range and south towards the Gallatin Range. The substantial setback distances will preserve these views. The building heights will not exceed zoning standards for the B-2 Zone Classification. 37 3b. Street cross sections if different from City Standards: In general, all streets follow City Standards. The proposed roads extend from existing roads and are designed with a similar cross-section as the existing roads. The extended roads include Tschache Lane, North 15th Avenue, North 14th Avenue, Patrick Street, and Baxter Lane. Baxter Lane will be improved to the three-lane minor arterial across the frontage of this project. 3c. Physiographic data including soils, hydrologic information and well information: These subjects are addressed in the Environmental Assessment and Community Impact Statement. Please reference Appendix D for NRCS soils information. Typical groundwater elevations for the site, based on monitoring wells associated with the Bozeman Solvent Plume, are approximately 5 feet below ground surface. Two monitoring wells from the Bozeman Solvent Plume Study are located on the PT Land property. In the areas near the located wetlands, the groundwater surface is very near the ground. Most wells located on or near the site are monitoring wells associated with the solvent plume. According to the Groundwater Information Center, 19 wells are located within the same quarter-section of this project. The proposed subdivision does not anticipate impacts to these wells. 3d. Preliminary Subdivision Plat: This is provided in Appendix J. 3e. Traffic Impact Analysis: A Traffic Impact Analysis is provided in Appendix G. The information generated from the traffic analysis is used as the basis for recommended improvements to the site and surrounding street systems to minimize impacts on surrounding uses. Reference Section 2.12, Street and Roads, of the Community Impact Statement for additional information. • 38 3f. Additional studies and plans: A Wetlands Report (Appendix F) and a Traffic Impact Study (Appendix G) were completed as part of this project. Geotechnical studies will be completed as part of the construction documents and on a lot-by-lot basis, as necessary. 3g. Proposed draft of legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's association: A draft version of the covenants and the design guidelines are included in Appendix H of this submittal. 3.2 INTENT OF PUD (RESPONSE TO 18.36.010, BMC) The following narrative addresses items A through 0, as listed in 18.36.010, BMC (PUD section) of the Unified Development Ordinance. Conformance with these is required in BMC 18.54.050 13.3. 18.36.010 "...it shall be the intent of this title to promote the City s pursuit of the following community objectives:" A. To ensure that future growth and development occurring within the City is in accord with the City's adopted growth policy, its specific elements, and its goals, objectives and policies. Response: The proposed PT Land planned unit development is in compliance with the both the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan and the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan and its goals, objectives, and policies. The project is under review as a PUD, which is required of subdivisions located within the Entryway Overlay zoning district. Further discussion regarding master plan compliance is provided below in response to BMC 18.36.090.E.2, PUD Criteria. Goal 3 of the North 191h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor is achieved with this project. Commercial projects are strongly supported by Objective "B" and Implementation Policies "A", which identify commercial uses within the entryway corridor as important to Gallatin Valley. This project • complies with the Land Use Plan within the North 19t'Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. 39 B. To allow opportunities for innovations in land development and redevelopment so that greater opportunities for high quality housing, recreation, shopping and employment may extend to all citizens of the Bozeman area. Response: The proposed PT Land complies with this objective in regards to recreation, shopping and employment. The intent of the project is to provide commercial development for use by the Bozeman area as allowed by the zoning and planning already in place. The project is a commercial infill project that provides recreation via proposed pedestrian connectivity to adjoining developments and open space lots available for public use. Shopping and employment opportunities will be available as businesses become established within this project. C. To foster the safe, efficient and economic use of land and transportation and other public facilities. Response: The project will continue the infill process that is appropriate for commercial land adjacent to arterial streets. Essential utilities are adjacent to the site and require only that they be extended through the project area. The project will utilize the current infrastructure as well as contribute to it with the continuation of North 15`h Avenue, North 141h Avenue, Patrick Street, and Tschache Avenue. Baxter Lane will be improved as part of this project. This addition will enhance the safety and efficiency of transportation in the area. D. To ensure adequate provision of public services such as water, sewer, electricity, open space and public parks. Response: Essential services including water, sewer and utilities are adjacent to the site. Public water and sewer infrastructure will be extended as part of this project. It is proposed that a water pressure- reducing valve station be installed with this.project to address high-pressure issues that the City has witnessed in this area. This project furthers the community objective by providing ample open space within the project with landscaping and a pedestrian trail network. 40. • • E. To avoid inappropriate development of lands and to provide adequate drainage and reduction of flood damage. Response: The site has been determined by the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan to.be appropriate for development. Adequate drainage will be assured by adherence to City and MDEQ standards. Building floor elevations and grading criteria will reduce the likelihood of flooding from Walton's Stream/Ditch and the upstream irrigation water conveyance system. F. To encourage patterns of development, which decrease automobile travel and encourage trip consolidation, thereby reducing traffic congestion and degradation of the existing air quality. Response: The portion of PT Land south of Tschache Lane exhibits a development pattern traditional to the Bozeman Area. The portion north of Tschache Lane is reserved for a large tenant, likely a hotel or convention center. This lot will include internal circulation designed for efficient traffic flow. The entire project is designed for ease of traffic with the resultant effect of limiting air pollution. Pedestrian circulation is encouraged via the sidewalk and trail system. G. To promote the use of bicycles and walking as effective modes of transportation. Response: The PT Land project is designed to promote walking or bicycle travel. The pedestrian network within the PUD is directly linked to the adjoining Bridger Peaks Village and Lowe's HIW PUD on the west and connects to Kenyon Noble to the south and the Tange property on the East. H. To reduce energy consumption and demand. Response: The proposed pedestrian network will help reduce energy consumption through fewer vehicle trips. 41 I. To minimize adverse environmental impacts of development and to protect special features of the geography. Response: The North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan has determined that the present project is appropriate for this area. The findings of the environmental assessment suggest that no serious impacts will result. The Walton's Stream Ditch, Mandeville Creek, and their corresponding wetlands, shall be retained as open space. J. To improve the design, quality and character of new development. Response: The design and quality of development within PT Land will be upheld by the design guidelines set forth in the proposed planned unit development. In general, the project creates its own character through a design theme that will be maintained throughout the entire project by adherence to the development guidelines and covenants. Management of the project, as empowered by the covenants, will provide the mechanism necessary for long-term maintenance of the site and continued conformance with the development guidelines. K. To encourage development of vacant properties within developed areas. Response: This project is an infill project with development already planned or completed for all areas surrounding this project. In addition, this project considers surrounding development and encourages specific uses that will tie this project to the surrounding area. The most northerly lot, identified as Lot 1, Block 4, is intended for hospitality/regional anchor neighbor. This designation complements similar uses located along Baxter Lane and is appropriate for fronting the Interstate-90 Corridor. The service warehouse neighborhood surrounds the Keynon Noble site and assists to transition from the existing lumberyard to other uses. The Support services neighborhood includes retail space, office space, and other uses as identified in the Development Guidelines and is buffered from the lumberyard by the service warehouse neighborhood. Lastly, the financial institution and services lot is located on Lot 1, Block 1, appropriate for visibility on Oak Street. A thorough description of these neighborhood classifications are found in the Development Guidelines. 42 L. To protect existing neighborhoods from the harmful encroachment of newer, incompatible developments. Response: The project is in compliance with the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan and its zoning specifications, both of which support that the proposed use is appropriate for the site. M. To promote logical development patterns of residential, commercial, office and industrial uses that will mutually benefit the developer, the neighborhood, and the community as a whole. Response: The present project seeks to promote these objectives by providing a mutually beneficial community of commercial businesses. This commercial project promotes Goal 3 of the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. N. To promote efficient use of land resources, full use of urban services, mixed uses, transportation options, and detailed and human-scale design. Response: The Bozeman 2020 Community Plan and the North 19'h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan promote the development of regional commercial and service uses along significant transportation routes and promote through the PUD process, human scale design including open space, pedestrian enhancements and pleasing buildings. 0. To meet the purposes established in BMC 18.02.040. Response: This project complies with the criteria set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance. • 43 a 3.3 PUD CRITERIA (RESPONSE TO BMC 18.36.090.E.2) 3.3.1 All Development Criteria 1. Does the development comply with all city design standards requirements and specifications for the following services: Water Supply Trails/walks/bikeways Sanitary Supply Irrigation Companies Fire Protection Electricity Flood hazard areas Natural Gas Telephone Storm Drainage Cable Television Streets Response: All of the public and private facilities will be designed and installed to City of Bozeman, MDEQ, and other applicable standards. The proposed pedestrian network is an integrated system of walkways and paths to allow access within the community and to the surrounding services. 2. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? Response: Natural wetland natural vegetation on the site will be preserved by inclusion within a watercourse setback. A small fraction of the wetland areas will be impacted by the extension of Tschache Lane, North 15th Avenue and Baxter Lane. It is the intent of the development to enhance the wetland corridors and provide a park like environment. There are no existing trees on site. 3. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized and cohesive planned unit development? Response: is All aspects of the site, including building, parking, transportation routes, pedestrian circulation and open space, have been organized to maximize the efficiency of the site while remaining 44 aesthetically pleasing. In general, trail systems tie the proposed development to adjacent properties and the buildings and landscaping are arranged to enhance the property. Because of this, a cohesive and functional arrangement of land uses is accomplished. 4. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement; transportation networks; selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources; etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? Response: The transportation network is designed for efficiency, thereby reducing overall traffic pollution. In addition, a pedestrian network, including trails and sidewalks, will encourage pedestrian travel and reduce overall energy use. 5. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? Response: Each lot will submit respective Site Plans to the City for Site Plan review. Due to the location of this project within an entryway corridor, the Site Plan must comply with the Design Objectives for Entryway Corridors in addition to the PT Land Development Guidelines. These documents govern the design of the site and include measures to ensure privacy of the employees and consumers of this project. For example, open space and landscape buffers will occur along Baxter Street and Oak Street. Building and parking arrangements will consider privacy with the design unique for each lot. 6. Park Land. Does the design and arrangement of buildings and open space areas contribute to the overall aesthetic quality of the site configuration, and has the area of park land or open space been provided for each proposed dwelling as required by BMC 18.50.020. Response: Significant areas of open space are set aside for public use within PT Land. Two large open space/wetland parks are located adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek, 45 • • respectively. The park along Mandeville Creek will include a trail system made available by PT Land to the public. The park adjacent to Walton's Stream/Ditch is accessible by an existing trail west of the creek. The proposed trails connect existing trail systems to the PT Land project. In addition, significant open space exists along Baxter Lane and Oak Street as part of the Greenway Setbacks. 7. Performance. Nonresidential developments within the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street corridor shall earn thirty performance points. Points may be earned in any combination of affordable housing and/or open space. Response: The PT Land project obtains the required thirty performance points via open space dedication. 8. Is the development being properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become as isolated "pad" to adjoining developments? Response: Pedestrian trails tie the proposed development to adjoining developments. 3.3.2 Commercial PUD Required Criteria 1. If the project contains any use intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment, does it meet the requirements for adult business? Response: Adult amusement and entertainment is not permitted within this development. 2. Is the project contiguous to an arterial street, and has adequate but controlled access been provided? Response: This project is adjacent to Oak Street, which is identified as an arterial street: Controlled access to Oak Street is discussed in detail in the Traffic Impact Analysis. A signal at North 11th Avenue and Oak Street is not immediately warranted but may be warranted as the PT Land project is 46 developed. It is proposed that the PT Land subdivision sign a waiver of the right to protest the creation of an SID for signal improvements associated with North 11'h Avenue and Oak Street. 3. Is the project on at least 2 acres of land? Response: Yes. This project entails 47.6 acres. 4. If the project contains two or more significant uses (for instance, retail, office, residential, hotel/motel and recreation), do the uses related to each other in terms of location within the PUD, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, architectural design, utilization of common open space and facilities, etc.? Response: The PT Land Development Guidelines emphasize the use of neighborhoods and their purpose of transitioning uses throughout the project with existing adjoining uses. Reference the Development Guidelines in Appendix H for a comprehensive description of the neighborhoods including their design purpose and objectives in transitioning use intensities. 5. Is it compatible with and does it reflect the unique character of surrounding area? Response: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding development. To the west of the proposed site is the commercial Bridger Peaks Town Center, high-density residential Bridger Peaks Village and regional commercial Lowe's HIW PUD; to the south, are housing developments to the east is commercial and to the north is the Interstate 90 Corridor. The surrounding area creates a mixed character community is in keeping with the City's master plan as well as the North 191h Avenue/Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. 6. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on-site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off-site parking areas that contain more than ten spaces? Response: . The combination of sidewalks and trails tie this project together. The larger lot, identified as Lot 1, Block 4, is adjacent to two open space lots that include trails. 47 7. Does the project encourage infill, or does the project otherwise demonstrate compliance with the land use guidelines of the Bozeman growth policy? Response: This project is an infill project with development constructed or planned for all developable areas surrounding the site. In addition, this project meets the Future Land Use designation as defined in the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. 8. Does the project provide for outdoor recreational area (such as additional landscaped areas, open spaces, trails or picnic areas) for the use and enjoyment of those living in, working in or visiting the development? Response: This project includes an excess of 30% open space as required for planned unit developments located in entryway corridors. Much of the open space is located in two distinct areas adjacent to streams and wetlands. These areas are accessed by trials for the enjoyment of the public. 3.4 DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The development guidelines for the proposed planned unit development include building design, signage, lighting and landscaping guidelines. The guidelines, in combination with all the other submittal materials and plans, define the intent and character of the proposed project. Through enforcement by the covenants, the development guidelines are intended to define future development of the site and buildings. Compliance with the developmental guidelines is required by the covenants and by law. The covenants and guidelines are presented as an exhibit in the Appendix H. A landscaping plan is provided as a map set within Appendix J. Included with the landscaping plan is a set of landscaping guidelines, which was developed with references to the respective City of Bozeman zoning codes. The written portion of the landscape guidelines, included in Appendix J, is structured to address all phases of the project. The sign guidelines define sign locations, types, size, lighting, and color ranges allowable In n guidelines resent what is being proposed for identification I.D. signs for the general, the sign g p g p p ( ) g 48 project entries and what will by utilized on the apartment complexes for signage. Signs on the structures in the outlying lots will be controlled by the guidelines and limited to wall mounted signs with the potential for a few smaller monument signs. Building elevations and sample palette for American Federal Savings Bank is included in Appendix J of this document. 49 cu a • D • i ,Q • �f � ��� �� � �, Q .. i J - z • • '�_ CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 406-582-2260 � 20 East Olive Street D c 406-582-2263 P.O. Box 12309--ni @bozeman.net Bozeman, Montana 59771-1230 JUN 2 7 2006 .bozemon.net DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLIC TIONPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -------------- 1.Name of Project/Development: PT Land Major Subdivision and Planned Unit Development 6 2. Property Owner Information: i I DEPARTMENT OF PLAN ING Name: Jay Perkins E-mail Address: 1eZry@karststage.c0 AND COMMUNITY DEVEL PMENT Mailing Address: 511 N.Wallace Avenue,Bozeman,MT 59715-5757 Phone: 406-556-3521 FAX: 406-556-3516 3.Applicant Information: Same as Property Name: P riY Owner E-mail Address: 0mg Address: Phone: FAX: 4. Representative Information: Name: Morrison-Maierle,Inc. E-mail.Address: kbelden@m-m.net;mskorpik@m-m.net Mailing Address: 3011 Palmer Street;Missoula,MT 59808 Phone: 406-542-8880 FAX: 406-5424801 5. Legal Description: Tract 2A of COS 1215F 6. Street Address: Bounded by Oak St,N11ih Ave,Baxter Ln,N15th Ave and Walton's Stream/Ditch'(excludes Kl%J). 7. Project Description: Project is a commercial planned unit development and major subdivision. ring Desipation(s): B-2 9. Current Land Use(s): ocultural 10. Bozeman 2020 Community Plan Designation: Regional Commercial,' Page 1 Appropriate Review Fee Submitted ❑ 11.Gross.Area: Acres: 47.62 Square Feet: 2,074,327 1 12.Net Area Acres: 40 ,9 Square Feet: 1 1'7��O'l a .Is the Subject Site Within an Overlay District? ❑✓ Yes,answer question 13a ❑ No,go to question 14 13a.Which Overlay District? ❑Casino ❑ Neighborhood Conservation 0 Entryway Corridor 14.Will this application require a deviation(s)? 0 Yes ❑ No 15.Application Type(please check all that apply): ❑O.Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan ❑A Sketch Plan for Regulated Activities in Regulated Wetlands ✓❑P.Planned Unit Development—Preliminary Plan ❑B.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development Pre-9/3/91 Site ❑Q.Planned Unit Development—Final Plan ❑C.Amendment/Modification of Plan Approved On/After 9/3/91 ❑R.Planned Unit Development—Master Plan ❑D.Reuse,Change in Use,Further Development,Amendment/CAA ❑S.Subdivision Pre-application ❑E.Special Temporary Use Permit ❑T.Subdivision Preliminary Plat ❑F.Sketch Plan/COA ❑U.Subdivision Final Plat ❑G.Sketch Plan/COA with an Intensification of Use ❑V.Subdivision Exemption __ _.._ ❑I- Preliminary Site Plan/COA_ _ - -—— _- _ ❑W.Annexation — ✓❑I.Preliminary Site Plan ❑K Zoning Map Amendment ❑J.Preliminary Master Site Plan ❑Y.Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment ❑K Conditional Use Permit ❑Z.Zoning Variance ❑L Conditional Use Permit/COA ❑AA.Growth Policy Map Amendment M.Administrative Project Decision Appeal ❑BB.Growth Policy Text Amendment ❑N.Administrative Interpretation Appeal ❑Other: This application must be accompanied by the appropriate cheddist(s),number of plans or plats,adjoiner information and materials,and fee (see Development Review Application Requirements and Fees). The plans or plats must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 81/2- by 11-inches or larger than 24-by 36-inches folded into individual sets no larger than St/2-by 14-inches. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Application deadlines are 5:00 pm every Tuesday. This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)before the submittal will be accepted. As indicated by the signatures) below, the applicants) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development,approved by the City of Bozeman shall be is conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by . the approval authority. Finny,I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: -a-OJ6 Property Owner's Signature: Date.- Property Owner's Signature: Date; Property Owner's Signature: Date: pW 2 (Develop-eat Revi—Application—Pmpased ll/25/03) 0 0 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST ase checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No"or"N/A" (not applicable) must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Subdivision Tune. ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record ❑ First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record with a Variance ❑ Second or Subsequent Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record 0 Major Subdivision B. Total Number of Lots. 18 C. Proposed Uses. Indicate the number of lots (or spaces subdivisions for rent or lease, or units for condominiums) for each of the following uses: Residential,single household Park/Recreation/Open Space Residential,multi household Manufactured Home Space Planned Unit Development Recreational Vehicle Space Condominium Unit 16 Commercial Townhouse Industrial 2 Other: open space • Preliminary Plat Requirements. The preliminary plat submittal must include=he following information. Please refer to Section 18.78.040,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Preliminary Plat Requirements . Yes No N/A 1. All information required with the pre-application plan, as outlined in Section 18.78.030 ❑✓ ❑ ❑ (Subdivision Preapplication Plan),BMC 2. Name and location of the subdivision, scale, scale bar,north arrow, date of preparation,lots and ❑✓ ❑ ❑ blocks (designated by number), the dimensions and area of each lot, and the use of each lot, if other than for single family 3. All streets, roads, alleys, avenues,highways, and easements; the width of the right-of-way, grades, ❑✓ ❑ ❑ and curvature of each; existing and proposed road and street names; and proposed location of intersections for any subdivision requiring access to arterial or collector highways 4. The names of adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining certificates of survey ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 5. An approximate survey of the exterior boundaries of the platted tract with bearings,distances,and [Z] ❑ ❑ curve data indicated outside of the boundary lines. When the plat is bounded by an irregular shoreline or a body of water, the bearings and distances of a closing meander traverse shall be given 6. The approximate location of all section comers or legal subdivision comers of sections pertinent to ❑✓ ❑ ❑ the subdivision boundary 7. If.the improvements required are to be completed in phases after the final plat is filed,the approxi- ❑✓ ❑ ❑ mate area of each phase shall be shown on the plat 8. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope is under 10 percent;5-16ot intervals if slope is between ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 10 and 15 percent;and 10-foot intervals if slope is 15 percent or greater 9. List of waivers granted from the requirements of Section 18.78.060 (Additional Subdivision 0 ❑ ❑ • Preliminary Plat Supplements),BMC during the preapplication process 10. Request for exemption from Montana Department of Environmental Quality Review as described ❑ ❑ ❑✓ in Section 18.78.040.K(Request for Exemption from MDEQ Review);BM.0 11. All appropriate certificates(refer to Chapter 18.12,BMC) 0 ❑ ❑ Page 3 (Subdivision Preliminary Plat Checklist—Prepared 11/26/03;revised 9/20/04;revised 5/2/05) • • E. Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions. The supplemental information shall include the following. Please refer to Section 18.78.010,BMC for the specific requirements for each item. MPreliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions Yes No N/A 1. A map showing all adjacent sections of land,subdivision,certificates of survey,streets and roads ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 2. Map of entire subdivision on either an 8'/z-inch x 11-inch, 8'/z-inch x 14-inch,or 11-inch x 17-inch ❑✓ ❑ ❑ sheet 3. A written statement describing any requested subdivision variances) and the facts of hardship ❑✓ ❑ ❑ upon which the request is based. Refer to Chapter 18.66 (Variance, Deviation and Appeal Procedures),BMC 4. Covenants,Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation for the Property Owners'Association ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 5. Encroachment permits or a letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, ❑ ❑ ❑✓ easements,rights-of way or driveways intersect State,County,or City highways,streets or roads 7. A letter of approval or preliminary approval from the City of Bozeman where a zoning change is ❑ ❑ ❑✓ necessary 8. A draft of such other appropriate certificates ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 9. Provision for maintenance of all streets (including emergency access), parks, and other required ❑ ❑ ❑✓ improvements if not dedicated to the public,or if private 10. Profile sheets for street grades greater than 5 percent ❑ 1 ❑ ❑✓ 11. If an authorized representative signs on behalf of an owner of record,a copy of the authorization ❑ ❑ ❑✓ shall be provided 12. A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District for ❑✓ ❑ ❑ control of noxious weeds 13. A preliminary platting certificate prepared by a Montana title company ❑✓ ❑ ❑ F. Additional Subdivision Prehrninary Plat Supplements. The following list of preliminary plat application supplements • shall also be provided for all subdivisions unless waived by the Developmcnt Review Committee during the pre- application process. The developer shall include documentation of any waivers granted by the City after the pre- application meeting or plan review. Please refer to Section 18.78.060, BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements Yes No N/A Waived 1. Surface water ✓ 11 a- 2. Floodplams ✓ ❑ 3. Groundwater 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Geology,soils and slope ✓ 11 El 5. 1 Vegetation El ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Wildlife ✓ 7. Historical features ✓ 8. Agriculture ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Agriculture water user facilities ✓ 10. Water and sewer ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. Stormwater management ✓ 12. Streets,roads and alleys ✓ 13. Utilities ✓ 14. Educational facilities ✓ 15. Land use ✓❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Parks and recreation facilities ✓ ❑ ❑ 17. Neighborhood center plan ❑ ❑✓ ❑ 18. Lighting plan ✓ • 19. Miscellaneous 0 20. Additional relevant and reasonable information identified during the preapplication ✓ process and required to adequately assess whether the proposed subdivision complies with the Unified Development Ordinance and the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act Page 4 G. By marking the checkbox below, the developer agrees to allow the Department of Planning & Community Development to send copies of correspondence to all parties listed on Page 1 of the Development Review Application(Property Owner,Applicant and Representative). If the checkbox is not marked, correspondence will be sent to the APPLICANT ONLYI Q✓ By marking this checkbox I agree to allow the Department of Planning& Community Development to send copies of correspondence to all parties listed on Page 1 of the Development Review Application. Applicant's Signature: Date: Applicant's Signature: 0 Date: Page 5 P' NED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHEC appropriate checklist shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No" or "N/A" (not -cable)must be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. ❑ Planned Unit Development—Concept Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Concept Plan Information Yes No N/A 1• Data regarding site conditions,land characteristics,available community facilities and ❑ ❑ ❑ utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land 2. Conceptual (sketch) drawing showing the proposed location of the uses of land, ❑ ❑ ❑ major streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site 3. A computation table showing the site's proposed land use allocations by location and ❑ ❑ ❑ as a percent of total site area B. ❑✓ Planned Unit Development—PrelimingU Plan. The following information and data shall be submitted: PUD Preliminary Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'/2-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: a. Application forms 0 ❑ ❑ b. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and 0 ❑ ❑ directors of the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development C. Statement of applicable City land use policies and objectives achieved by the ❑✓ ❑ 0 proposed plan and how it furthers the implementation of the Bozeman growth polity d. Statement of the proposed ownership of open space areas ✓❑ ❑ ❑ e. Statement of the applicant's intentions with regard to future ownership of all 0 ❑ ❑ or portions of the planned unit development f. Estimate of number of employees for business, commercial and.industrial 0 ❑ ❑ uses g. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ applicant ` h. Where deviations from the requirements of.this title are proposed, the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ applicant shall submit evidence of successful completion of the applicable community design objectives and criteria of Section 18.36.090 (PUD Design Objectives and Criteria),BMC.The applicant shall submit written explanation for each of the applicable objectives or criteria as to how the plan does or does not address the objective or criterion. The Planning Director may require, or the applicant may choose to submit,evidence that is beyond what is required in that section. Any element of the proposal that varies from the criterion shall be described i. Detailed description of how conflicts between land uses of different character 0 ❑ ❑ are being avoided or mitigated j. Statement of design methods to reduce energy . consumption, (e.g., ❑✓ ❑ ❑ home/business utilities,transportation fuel,waste recycling) Page 3 (PUD Checklist—Prepared 12/2/03;revised 9/21/04) PUD Preliminary Plan information,continued Yes No N/A 1. The following information shall be presented in an 8'/2-by 11-inch vertically bound document.The document shall be bound so that it will open and lie flat for reviewing and organized in the following order: k. A development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction ❑✓ ❑ ❑ of the planned unit development, or stages of the same, can be expected to begin and be completed, including the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and common space areas j. One reduced version of all preliminary plan and supplemental plan.maps and ❑✓ ❑ ❑ graphic illustrations at 81h-by 11-inches or 11-by 17-inches size 2. In addition to all of the information listed on the Site Plan Checklist, the following information shall be included on the site plan: a. Notations of proposed ownership, public or private, should be included ❑✓ ❑ ❑ where appropriate b. The proposed treatment of the perimeter of the planned unit development, ❑✓ ❑ ❑ including materials and techniques used, such as screening, fences,walls and other landscaping C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 3. Viewsheds: a. Looking onto and across the site from areas around the site,describe and map ❑✓ ❑ ❑ the views and vistas from adjacent properties that may be blocked or impaired by development of the site b. Describe and map areas of high visibility on the site as seen from adjacent ❑✓ ❑ ❑ off-site locations 4. Street cross-section schematics shall be submitted for each general category of street,including. a. The proposed width ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. Treatment of curbs and gutters, or other storm water control system if other 0 ❑ ❑ than curb and gutter is proposed C. Sidewalk systems ❑✓ ❑ ❑ d. Bikeway systems,where alternatives to the design criteria and standards of the 0 ❑ ❑ City are proposed 5. Physiographic data,including the following a. A description of the hydrologic conditions of the site with analysis of water ❑✓ ❑ ❑ table fluctuation and a statement of site suitability for intended construction and proposed landscaping,in compliance with Section 18.78.120.B.3.c,BMC b. Locate and identify the ownership of existing wells or well sites within 400 ❑✓ ❑ ❑ feet of the site 6. If the project involves or requires platting, a preliminary subdivision plat, subject to ❑✓ ❑ ❑ the requirements of this title relative to subdivisions,shall be submitted 7. Not withstanding the waiver provisions of Section 18.78.080.B.9, BMC, at the ✓❑ ❑ ❑ discretion of the City Engineer,a traffic impact analysis shall be prepared based upon the proposed development. The-analysis shall include provisions of the approved development guidelines, and shall address impacts upon surrounding land uses.The Director of Public Service may require the traffic impact analysis to include the information in Section 18.78.0501, BMC. If a traffic impact analysis has been submitted as part of a concurrent subdivision review, that analysis shall meet this requirement 8. If the development's compliance with the community design objectives and criteria is ❑ ❑ Q under question, the City Commission may require additional impact studies or other plans as deemed necessary for providing thorough consideration of the proposed planned unit development 9. A proposed draft of a legal instrument containing the creation of a property owner's 0 ❑ ❑ association sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 18.72.020 (Property Owners Association),BMC shall be submitted with the preliminary plan application Page 4 C. ❑ Planned Unit Develo'nt—Final Plan. The following information*data shall be submitted: PUD Final Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. A list of names of all general and limited partners and/or officers and directors of ❑ ❑ ❑ the corporation involved as either applicants or owners of the planned unit development 2. A final plan site plan shall be submitted on a 24- by 36-inch sheet(s) at the same scale as the approved preliminary plan. If a different scale is requested or required, a copy of the approved preliminary plan shall be submitted that has been enlarged or reduced to equal the scale of the final plan. However, only the scales permitted for the preliminary plans shall be permitted for final plans. The final plan site plan shall show the following information: a. Land use data(same information as required on the preliminary site plan) ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Lot lines,easements,public rights-of-way as per subdivision plat ❑ ❑ ❑ C. Attorney's or owner's certification of ownership ❑ ❑ ❑ d. Planning Director certification of approval of the site plan and its ❑ ❑ ❑ conformance with the preliminary plan e. Owner's certification of acceptance of conditions and restrictions as set forth ❑ ❑ ❑ on the site plan 3. A final landscape plan consistent with the conditions and restrictions of the ❑ ❑ ❑ approved preliminary plan shall be submitted. It shall also be consistent with the Chapter 18.48 (Landscaping), BMC, except that any stated conditions arid restrictions of the preliminary plan approval shall supersede the provisions of Chapter 18.48(Landscaping),BMC 4. An official final subdivision plat of the site must accompany the final planned unit ❑ ❑ ❑ development plan when applicable. City approval of the final subdivision plat shall be required before issuance of building permits 5. Prior to submission of the final plan to the DRC and ADR staff, engineering plans ❑ ❑ ❑ and specifications for sewer, water, street improvements and other public improvements,and an executed improvements agreement in proper form providing for the installation of such improvements,must be submitted to and approved by the City 6. A plan for the maintenance of open space, meeting the requirements of Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 18.72.040(Common Area and Facility Maintenance Plan and Guarantee),BMC,shall be submitted with an application for final plan approval. Open space shown on the approved final plan shall not be used for the construction of.any structures not shown on the final plan • Page 5 0 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST se checklists shall be completed and returned as part of the submittal. Any item checked "No"or"N/A" (not applicable) st be explained in a narrative attached to the checklist. Incomplete submittals will be returned to the applicant. A. Design Review Board QRB) Site Plan Review Thresholds. Does the proposal include one or more of the following: Design Review Board(DRB)Site Plan Review Thresholds Yes No 1. 20 or more dwelling units in a multiple household structure or structures ❑ ❑✓ 2. 30,000 or more square feet of office space, retail commercial space, service commercial space or ❑ ❑✓ industrial space 3. More than two buildings on one site for permitted office uses, permitted retail commercial uses, ❑ ❑✓ permitted service commercial uses,pemutted industrial uses or pemvtted combinations of uses 4. 20,000 or more square feet of exterior storage of materials or goods ❑ ✓❑ 5. Parking for more than 60 vehicles ❑ ✓❑ B. General Information. The following information shall be provided for site plan review: General Information Yes No N/A 1• Location map,including area within one-half mile of the site 0 ❑ ❑ 2. List of names and addresses of property owners according to Chapter 18.76,BMC(Noticing) ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 3. A construction route map shall be provided showing how materials and heavy equipment will ❑ ❑ 0 travel to and from the site. The route shall avoid, where possible, local or minor collector streets or streets where construction traffic would disrupt neighborhood residential character or pose a threat to public health and safety 4. Boundary line of property with dimensions ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Date of plan preparation and changes �' ❑ ❑ 6. North point indicator 0 ❑ ❑ 7. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet,but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 8• Parcel size(s)in gross acres and square feet ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 9• Estimated total floor area and estimated ratio of floor area to lot size (floor area ratio, FAR), ✓❑ ❑ ❑ with a breakdown by land use 10. Location,percentage of parcel(s)and total site,and square footage for the following.. a. Existing and proposed buildings and structures 0 ❑ ❑ b. Driveway and parking ❑✓ ❑ ❑ C. Open space and/or landscaped area,recreational use areas,public and semipublic land, 0 ❑ ❑ parks,school sites,etc. d.. Public street right-of-way ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 11. Total number, type and density per type of dwelling units, and total net and gross residential '❑ ❑ ❑✓ density and density per residential parcel 12. Detailed plan of all parking facilities, including circulation aisles, access drives, bicycle racks, 0 ❑ ❑ compact spaces, handicapped spaces and motorcycle parking, on-street parking, number of • employee and non-employee parking spaces, existing and proposed,and total square footage of each Page 3 (Site Plan Checklist—Prepared 12/05/03;revised 9/22/04) General Information,continued Yes No N/A 13. The information required by Section 18.78.0601, BMC (Streets, Roads and Alleys), unless ❑✓ ❑ ❑ such information was previously provided through a subdivision review process, or the provision of such information was waived in writing by the City during subdivision review of the land to be developed,or the provision of such information is waived in writing by the City prior to submittal of a preliminary site plan application 14. Description and mapping of soils existing on the site, accompanied by analysis as to the ❑ ❑ suitability of such soils for the intended construction and proposed landscaping 15. Building design information(on-site): a. Building heights and elevations of all exterior walls of the building(s)or structure(s) ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. Height above mean sea level of the elevation of the lowest floor and location of lot ✓❑ ❑ ❑ outfall when the structure is proposed to be located in a floodway or floodplain area C. Floor plans depicting location and dimensions of all proposed uses and activities ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 16. Temporary facilities plan showing the location of all temporary model homes, sales offices ❑ ❑ ✓❑ and/or construction facilities,including temporary signs and parking facilities 17. Unless already provided through a previous subdivision review, a noxious weed control plan ❑ ❑ complying with Section 18.78.050.H, BMC (Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 18. Drafts of applicable supplementary documents as set forth in Chapter 18.72, BMC ❑✓ ❑ ❑ (Supplementary Documents) C. Site Plan Information. The location,identification and dimension of the following existing and proposed data, onsite and to a distance of 100 feet (200 feet for PUDs) outside the site plan boundary, exclusive of public rights-of-way, unless otherwise stated: Site Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Topographic contours at a minimum interval of 2 feet, or as determined by the'Planning ❑✓ ❑ ❑ Director 2. Adjacent streets and street tights-of-way to a distance of 150 feet, except for sites adjacent to 0 ❑ ❑ major arterial streets where the distances shall be 200 feet 3. On-site streets and rights-of-way ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 4. Ingress and egress points ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 5. Traffic flow on-site ✓❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Traffic flow off-site ❑ 7. Utilities and utility rights-of-way or easements: a. Electric ✓❑ ❑ ❑ b. Natural gas ❑✓ ❑ ❑ C. Telephone,cable television and similar utilities ❑✓ ❑ ❑ d. Water ❑✓ ❑ ❑ e. Sewer(sanitary,treated effluent and storm) ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 8. Surface water,including: a. Holding ponds,streams and irrigation ditches ✓❑ ❑ ❑ b. Watercourses,water bodies and wetlands ✓❑ ❑ ❑ C. Floodplains as designated on the Federal Insurance Rate Map or that may otherwise be ❑ ❑ Q identified as lying within a 100-year floodplain through additional floodplain delineation, engineering analysis, topographic survey or other objective and factual • basis d. A floodplain analysis report in compliance with Chapter 18.58, BMC (Bozeman ❑ ❑ ❑� Floodplain Regulations)if not previously provided with subdivision review Page 4 MW Site Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 9. Grading and drainage plan, including provisions for on-site retention/detention and water 0 ❑ ❑ quality improvement facilities as required by the Engineering Department, or in compliance with any adopted storm drainage ordinance or best management practices manual adopted by the City 10. All drainageways, streets, arroyos, dry gullies, diversion ditches, spillways, reservoirs, etc. which may be incorporated into the storm drainage system for the property shall be designated: a. The name of the drainageway(where appropriate) ❑✓ ❑ ❑ b. The downstream conditions (developed,available drainageways,etc.) ❑✓ ❑ ❑ C. Any downstream restrictions ❑ ❑ 11. Significant rock outcroppings, slopes of greater than 15 percent or other significant ❑ ❑ ✓❑ topographic features 12. Sidewalks, walkways, driveways, loading areas and docks, bikeways, including typical details ❑✓ ❑ ❑ and interrelationships with vehicular circulation system, indicating proposed treatment of points of conflict 13. Provision for handicapped accessibility, including but not limited to, wheelchair ramps, Q ❑ ❑ parking spaces, handrails and curb cuts, including construction details and the applicant's certification of ADA compliance 14. Fences and walls,including typical details ❑ ❑ ❑✓ -15. Exterior signs. Note—The review of signs in conjunction with this application is only review ❑✓ ❑ ❑ for compliance with Chapter 18.52,BMC (Signs). A sign permit must be obtained from the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to erection of any and all signs. 16. Exterior refuse collection areas,including typical details ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 17. A site plan,complete with all structures,parking spaces,building entrances,traffic areas (both ❑✓ ❑ ❑ vehicular and pedestrian), vegetation that might interfere with lighting, and adjacent uses, containing a layout of all proposed fixtures by location and type. The materials required in Section 18.78.060.R,BMC(Lighting Plan),if not previously provided 18. Curb,asphalt section and drive approach construction details ❑ ❑ ✓❑ 19. Landscaping-detailed plan showing plantings, equipment,and other appropriate information ❑✓ ❑ ❑ as required in Section 18.78.100, BMC (Submittal Requirements for Landscaping Plans). If required,complete section C below 20. Unique natural features, significant wildlife areas and vegetative cover,including existing trees ❑ ❑ ✓❑ and shrubs having a diameter greater-than 2.5 inches,by species 21. Snow storage areas ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 22. Location of City limit boundaries,and boundaries of Gallatin County's Boz!man Area Zoning ❑✓ ❑ ❑ Jurisdiction,within or near the development 23. Existing zoning within 200 feet of the site ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 24. Historic, cultural and archeological resources, describe and map any designated historic ❑ ❑ ✓❑ structures or districts,and archeological or cultural sites 25. Major public facilities,including schools,parks,trails,etc. ❑✓ ❑ ❑ D. Landscape Plans. If a landscape plan is required,the following information shall be provided.on the landscape plan: Landscape Plan Information Yes No N/A 1. Date, scale, north arrow, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of both the 0 ❑ ❑ property owner and the person preparing the plan 2. Location of existing boundary lines and dimensions of the lot ❑✓ ❑ ❑ Page 5 Landscape Plan Information,continued Yes No N/A 3. Approximate centerlines of existing watercourses, required watercourse setbacks, and the ❑✓ ❑ ❑ location of any 100-year floodplain;the approximate location of significant drainage features; and the location and size of existing and proposed streets and alleys,utility easements,utility lines,driveways and sidewalks on the lot and/or adjacent to the lot 4. Project name,street address,and lot and block description ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 5. Location,height and material of proposed screening and fencing(with berms to be delineated ❑✓ ❑ ❑ by one foot contours) 6. Locations and dimensions of proposed landscape buffer strips, including watercourse buffer ❑� ❑ ❑ strips 7. Complete landscape legend providing a description of plant materials shown on the plan, ❑✓ ❑ ❑ including typical symbols, names (common and botanical name), locations, quantities, container or caliper sizes at installation,heights, spread and spacing. The location and type of all existing trees on the lot over 6 inches in caliper must be specifically indicated 8. Complete illustration of landscaping and screening to be provided in or near off-street parking ❑✓ ❑ ❑ and loading areas,including information as to the amount(in square feet) of landscape area to be provided internal to parking areas and the number and location of required off-street parking and loading spaces 9. An indication of how existing healthy trees (if any) are to be retained and protected from ❑ ❑ ✓❑ damage during construction 10.- Size,height,location and material of proposed seating,lighting,planters,sculptures,and water ✓❑ ❑ ❑ - features 11. A description of proposed watering methods ❑� ❑ ❑ 12. Location of street vision triangles on the lot(if applicable) Q ❑ ❑ 13. Tabulation of points earned by the plan — see Section 18.48.060, BMC (Landscape ❑✓ ❑ ❑ Performance Standards) 14. Designated snow removal storage areas 0 ❑ ❑ 15. Location of pavement,curbs,sidewalks and gutters ❑✓ ❑ ❑ 16. Show location of existing and/or proposed drainage facilities which are to be used for 0 ❑ ❑ drainage control 17. Existing and proposed grade 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Size of plantings at the time of installation and at maturity ❑✓ 13, ❑ 19. Areas to be irrigated 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Planting plan for watercourse buffers,per Section 18.42.100,BMC (Watercourse Setbacks),if ❑✓ ❑ ❑ not previously provided through subdivision review 21. Front and side elevations of buildings, fences and walls with height dimensions if not ❑ ❑ ❑✓ otherwise provided by the application. Show open stairways and other projections from exterior building walls Page 6 r • 1400 Prospect Avenue,Helena,Montana 59601 P.O.Box 4999,Helena,MT 59604 (406)442-3080 (fax 406/4574035) SAVINGS BANK July 19, 2006 City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: Oak Street Property - - To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to infDrm you that our development of the property tc be located on Lot 1, Block 1 of PT Land Major Subdivision, will comply with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any reasonable conditions considered necessary by the • approval body. Please contact me if there are any further questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Larry A. Dreyer President and CEO- ld/lro Y UrpoJtr *fit * Federally Imured 1 * In SIM.00V i ® MORRISON ElOn MERLE,INC. memo An Employee-Owned Company TO: Lanette Windemaker, AICP PT Land Planned Unit Development/Major Subdivision, Appendix A FROM: Molly Skorpik RE: Relaxation Requests DATE: September 12, 2006 This memo sets out the deviation requests for PT Land Planned Unit Development and Major Subdivision and in doing so will demonstrate that the "deviation will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced by the existing standards of this title, and which will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this chapter, with the adopted goals of the Bozeman growth policy and with any relevant adopted Design Objectives Plan" as stated in BMC 18.36.030.D.3. The format of this document will be to cite the code, state the request and then provide the justification for the relaxation following the criteria set out in BMC 18.66.070 Subdivision Variances, which are reproduced as follows: 1. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties, 2. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, an undue hardship to the owner would result if strict interpretation of this title is enforced, 3. The variance will not cause a substantial increase in public costs, and 4. The variance will not, in any manner, place the subdivision in nonconformance with any other provisions of this title or with the City's growth policy. Relaxation Requests Code: BMC 18.44.080.A General. Request: To eliminate the sidewalk from the north side of Baxter Lane. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties PT Land Relaxation Re f sts 0 • because it fronts Interstate 90 and does not provide access to any adjoining properties. 2. Construction of a sidewalk that does not serve the public will place an undue hardship on the applicant and will be a waste of natural resources for the construction of the sidewalk. 3. Elimination of the sidewalk will reduce the amount of infrastructure that must be maintained and will therefore not increase costs to the public. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.44.080.A General. Request: To build a 10-foot asphalt trail south of Baxter Lane in lieu of a standard city sidewalk. Review Criteria: 1. The 10-foot asphalt trail is intended to parallel the south side of Baxter Lane meandering through and around jurisdictional wetlands and will not if granted be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties. The asphalt trail, twice as wide as a standard city sidewalk will provide as good or better access as the 5-foot standard sidewalk and will provide the pedestrian and bicycling public with a more interesting and safer pathway. 2. Construction of both the standard sidewalk and a trail through this area will result in a hardship on the applicant due to the presence of wetlands caused by water ponding behind Baxter Lane. Construction of both walks will result in the destruction of a greater amount of wetland areas and waste of natural resources. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public since the PT Land Owners Association will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the trail. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards. Request: To build North 15th Avenue north of Patrick Street to a 65-foot wide collector standard instead of a 90-foot collector standard. Review Criteria: 1. The request to construct North 15th Avenue as a 42-foot back-of-curb to back-of-curb street within a 65-foot right-of-way is a continuation of the street section constructed south of Patrick Street. Granting of the relaxation will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general 2of8 PT Land Relaxation Repsts 0 welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties. This new section will match provides adequate capacity for vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. 2. Construction of a 90-foot wide collector standard north of Patrick Street will result in a hardship on the applicant since it is neither necessary nor will not match the street section south of Patrick Street. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public since and may result in a cost savings over time since the street and right-of-way widths are less, thereby reducing maintenance costs. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC and in fact allow the proposed street to conform to that which exists today. Code: BMC 18.44.060 Street Improvement Standards. Request: To eliminate the sidewalk on the west side of North 15th Avenue between Patrick Street and Tschache Lane. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, • safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since it fronts on Walton's Stream/Ditch and does not provide access to any adjoining properties. Linear north-south pedestrian/bicycle access is provided through PT Land PUD via the sidewalk on the east side of North 15th Avenue and via the future trail along the west side of Walton's Stream/Ditch as part of the Bridger Peaks Town Center PUD. 2. Construction of a the sidewalk on the west side of North 15th Avenue will result in a hardship on the applicant due to the proximity of said stream/ditch and result in the waste of natural resources to construct said walk for no real purpose. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public and may result in a cost savings over time due to reduced maintenance costs. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.44.010.B. Relation to Developed Areas. Request: To provide a private drive connector between Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane in lieu of extending a public street (North 15th or 14th Avenue). Private Drive shall be a minimum 30-foot wide, be privately maintained, with full public access. 3of8 PT Land Relaxation Regfsts of • Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since the private drive will provide access equivalent to that of a public street, while preserving maximum flexibility in design and layout of Lot 1, Block 4. 2. Construction of a public street through this lot dominated by wetlands and stream corridors will result in a hardship on the applicant by limiting the flexibility necessary to provide quality site design. Three private access road options are included in the submittal demonstrating possible alignments depending upon the development pattern in Block 4. Each option acts as a public road with direct connection between Baxter and Tschache and connections to adjacent parking provided by driveways. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public since the applicant or their successors shall be responsible for the construction and maintenance of the private drive. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. • Code: BMC 18.44.010.E. Dead-End Streets. Request: To terminate Tschache Street at the intersection with North 15rh Avenue near the west property line. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since turn-around or thru-access is provided at the intersection with North 15th Avenue. 2. The applicant is motivated to develop and enter into an agreement with the adjoining property owner, Philip Saccoccia, Jr., to cause Tschache Lane to be extended to the west and to construct the crossing of Walton's Stream-Ditch. The cost of construction of the roadway would be shared on a pro-rata frontage basis with the cost of the bridge/culvert crossing divided out on a 50-50 basis. The applicant cannot, without easements and right of entry, extend Tschache Lane across Walton's Stream/Ditch and is therefore is requesting relief from this section of the BMC. The applicant is agreeable to conditions stipulating that the appropriate SID waivers be executed and financial security be posted as determined by the City. Denial of this request will result in a hardship by making the applicant subject to the decisions of • the adjoining property owner. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public since the applicant or their successors shall be responsible for the 4 of 8 PT Land Relaxation Rests 0 • construction of their equitable share of Tschache Lane and the crossing of Walton's Stream/Ditch. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.42.040.B. Block Length. Request: To allow blocks of more than 400 feet in length due to topography, the presence of critical lands, and access control. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since the block lengths will conform to existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties. 2. Breakup of the blocks to conform to this requirement of the BMC will serve no purpose resulting in a hardship on this property. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in • nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.42.040.B. Block Length. Request: To allow Block 4 to exceed 1320 feet in length due to due to its irregular shape the presence of extensive wetlands along two watercourses and the desire to maintain a single consolidated parcel that has been designated as a site for hospitality/convention center uses. Larger lots with single and multiple uses already exist on the adjoining properties and this relaxation will not cause any harm to the public welfare. Additionally Block 4 will be served by 4 trails and at least one private access drive. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since the length of Block 4 conforms to the topography, critical lands comprised of watercourses and their associated wetlands and existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties. 2. Public access through Block 4 will be provided by trails in the open space corridors along Walton's Stream/Ditch, Mandeville Creek and Baxter Lane. Public access will also be provided through the site via a private drive connecting Tschache Lane with Baxter Lane. Additional streets and trails to reduce the size of the block will reduce the integrity 5 of 8 PT Land Relaxation Rests • of Lot 1 Block 4 resulting in an inability to develop the site for hospitality/convention purposes as proposed. Enforcement of this section of the BMC will result in hardship on this property. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.42.040.C. Block Width. Request: To allow blocks of more than 400 feet in width to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since the block lengths will conform to existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties. 2. Breakup of the blocks to conform to this requirement of the BMC will serve no purpose resulting in a hardship on this property. • 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public. 4. The granting of the request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: BMC 18.42.040.D. Rights-Of-Way for Pedestrians. Request: To permit the platting of commercial lands in Block 3 with no pedestrian circulation. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties since Block 3 will conform to existing and proposed street networks and will also conform to existing development patterns established on adjoining properties. 2. Breakup of the Block 3 with a pedestrian way to conform to this requirement of the BMC does not achieve the goals of the BMC or meet the design guidelines of this project resulting in a hardship on this property. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public. 4. The granting of the request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. 6of8 PT Land Relaxation Rests • Code: 18.42.100.B.6.a Watercourse Setback Request: To permit on-site storm water treatment facilities in the Zone 1 but in no case will the treatment facilities encroach closer than 30 feet from the actual watercourse as defined by the channel bank. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties for the following: i. The storm water detention facilities are wholly contained within the applicant's property and have no impact on adjoining or downstream properties. ii. If granted, construction of the detention facilities will have the least impact to existing wetlands, causing no real or perceived harm to public's general welfare. 2. The granting of this request will greatly relieve the hardship on this property by providing the necessary flexibility in design of the storm water detention facilities to meet the BMC and requirements of the regulatory agencies. The wetlands that would be impacted adjacent to Mandeville Creek are not high quality wetlands, but would nevertheless • require mitigation causing additional loss of land in and along the stream corridors. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public since the applicant and their successors shall be responsible for the construction and maintenance of the storm water detention facilities and the common area open space in which they will be placed. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. Code: 18.42.100.B.3.c Watercourse Setback Request: To reduce the setback from the actual watercourse from 50 to 35 feet along Walton Stream/Ditch south of Tschache Lane to allow for the routing of North 15th Avenue. Review Criteria: 1. The granting of the request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be injurious to other adjoining properties for following reasons: i. The adjoining property to the west already has a 35-foot watercourse setback as provided for by the Bridger Peaks Town Center PUD. 7 of 8 PT Land Relaxation Re sts 0 • ii. The stream corridor in this section is well incised resembling more the ditch conveyance than a stream, thereby having less of an impact then if the watercourse were more stream-like. 2. Construction of a North 15th Avenue down the property line separating PT Lands from Bridger Peaks Town Center to the west would necessitate relocation or piping of Walton's Stream/Ditch. Alternate routes to the east would render additional lands unusable on a site that already exceeds the BMC open space requirements, resulting in a hardship on the applicant. The applicant is committed to working with the City and regulatory agencies to develop a design for North 15th Avenue that address the competing interests of watercourse preservation, installation of required transportation facilities and conservation of useable land. 3. Granting of this request will not result in increased cost to the public. 4. The granting of this request will not cause this project to be in nonconformance with any other provisions of the BMC. M:13948\004\Docslpreplat—psite\variance temoate.doc • • 8of8 'i f "'_ � . ' � t o .�. �. �--- . , i � � -� • j rn n. � x. � � r r 1 ,,. • ' M � � � 1 �s �� � � . �M rya a< 't:3 �: Q. La.. f i It I --- i t PRELDMgARY SUBDIVSION CERTIFICATE OF TITLE Date: April 27, 2006 Order Number: 1-83563 Policy No. 7208926- 2233 To: Morrison—Maierle, Inc. 306 West Railroad Street, Suite 105 Missoula, MT 59802 cc: (2) Morrison—Maierle, Inc. CHICA.GO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY To the County of Gallatin and the City of Bozeman in Montana CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri, with its principal office in the City of Chicago, Illinois, and duly authorized to insure titles in Montana hereby certifies that from its examination of these public records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the real estate described in Schedule A hereof,as of the 20th day of April 12006 ,at 5 o'clock RM.,the title to the described real estate was indefeasibly vested in fee simple of record in: P.T. Land, a Montana general partnership subject only to the objections,liens charges,encumbrances and other matters shown under Schedule B hereof. The maximum liability of the undersigned under this certificate is limited to the sum of$ 200.00 This certificate of title is made in consideration of the payment of the premium by the subdivider of the land and for the use of the County and City above named. E ` AMERICRICANLANDTITI.E CHICAGO TTfLE INSURANCE COMPANY - COMPANY OF MONTANA Home office: BY1800 W.Koch!P.O.Box398 ftemnMT59715159771-M Phone:(888)405-528910Da)587-5563 r Fax:(406)587-8038 Email:80e@altc.blz ` •a ;— Branch Office: `' ATTEST President " , ,�•, 15 Geyser Street!P.O.Box 1248 su Ennis.MT59729 ..' Phone:(800)405-52M 1(406)682-SM• „// Fax:(408)682-5288 Emat aftc@3rtvers.net uthori d Si story Secretary Reorder Form No.9113(Reprinted 11103) Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title For Use In Montana • Schedule A Page 2 Certificate No.: 7208926-2233 Order No.: 1-83563 Being the legal description of the real estate covered by this certificate. The following described parcel of real estate: A tract of land being Tract 2A of C.O.S. 1215F, located in Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 5 East,P.M.M.; City of Bozeman, Gallatin County,Montana and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center'A corner of said Section 1; Thence N 87°55'37"W, along the east-west midsection line of said Section 1, a distance of 920.00 feet to the southeast corner of said Tract 2A, said point being the True Point of Beginning;Thence N 87'55'37"W continuing along said midsection line, a distance of 472.47 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract 2A;Thence N 0enc°2222"E a distance of 2482.03 feet to the southerly right of way Baxter Lane; Thence along said herly right of way through the following courses: e along an arc to the right a distance of 119.51 feet, said are having a delta angle of a'06'04 a radius of 752.41 feet, a chord bearing of S 58'30'23"E, and a chord length of 119.39 feet; Thence S 53'57'21"E a distance of 521.08 feet; Thence along an arc to the left a distance of 104.70 feet, said arc having a delta angle of V22'30",a radius of 4362.30 feet, a chord bearing of S 54138'36"E, and a chord length of 104.69 feet; Thence S 69'16'47"E a distance of 20.94 feet; Thence along an arc to the left a distance of 584.88 feet, said arc having a delta angle of 7'41'27", a radius of 4357.30 feet, a chord bearing of S 59'2637"E, and a chord length of 584.44 feet; Thence S.63'17'20"E a distance of 232.77 feet to the north—south midsectioti line; Thence leaving Baxter Lane right of way, S 01042'37"W a distance of 854.31 feet along said midsection line; Thence N 87'55'37"W a distance of 920.00 feet;Thence S 0.1142'37"W a distance of 838.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. AMERICAN LAND TITLE COMPANY u orized Signature) Schedule A Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) M a Schedule B Page 3 Certificate No.: 7208926-2233 Order No.: 1-83563 Being all of the estates, interests, equities, lawful claims, or demands, defects, or objections whatsoever to title; and all easements, restrictions, liens, charges, taxes (general, special, or inheritance, or assessments of whatever nature), or encumbrances; and all other matters whatsoever affecting said premises, or-the estate, right, title or interest:of the record owners, •which now do exist of record. 1. Except all minerals in or under said land including,but not limited to,metals, oil, gas, coal, stone and mineral rights,mining rights and easement rights or other matters relating thereto, whether expressed or implied. 2. Easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions, and other servitudes that are not subject to the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act are not shown herein. 3. Taxes for the year 2006 and subsequent years. Taxes for the year 2005 are paid. Taxes for the year 2006 are a lien not yet due or payable. Included within the General Taxes are Gallatin Conservation District, Gallatin County Water Quality District, Open Space Bonds and Planning District. (Parcel No. RGG23396) 4. Special assessments levied by the City of Bozeman for 2005-2006 under Parcel No. RGG23396: First Half: District No. 8000 Street Maintenance. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. Second Half: District No:8000 Street Maintenance. District No. 8001 Tree Maintenance. First and•Second Half Installments are paid. No liability is assumed for any special assessments, snow removal, sawer assessment or garbage assessment not set forth in the Assessment Books of the City of Bozeman. 5. No Search has been made for water rights and unpatented mining claims, and liability thereon is excluded from coverage of this certificate. END OF SCHEDULE B Schedule B Preliminary Subdivision Certificate of Title(Montana) AMERICAN LAND TITLE COMPANY PRIVACY POLICY We collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources: a Information we receive from you, such as your name, address,telephone number, or social security number; ■ Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others.We receive this information from your lender,attorney,real estate broker, etc; and • Information from public records. We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone,except as permitted by law. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information, to provide the products and services requested by you or your lender. We maintain physical,electronic,and procedural safeguards that comply with appropriate federal and state regulations. If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from us.We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. r ' A FINANCIAL GROUP ', TI G LTP�F C�IVtANES l? ACY STATEN4ENT July 1,2001 We recognize and respect the privacy expectations of today's.consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws.We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information ("Personal Information7%and to whom it is disclosed,will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve.This Privacy Statement provides that explanation.We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business,we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: ■ From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; a From your transactions with,or from the services being performed by,us,our affiliates,or others; n From our internet web sites; ■ From the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others;and ■ From consumer or other reporting agencies. Our Policies Regarding the Protection of the Confidentiality and Security of Your Personal Information We maintain physical,electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates,such as insurance companies,agents,and other real estate settlement service providers.We also may disclose your Personal Information: ■ to agents,brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested; ■ to third party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf,and ■ to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest In addition,we will disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission,when we are required by law to do so,or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities.We also may disclose your Personal Information when --otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement,transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of some,of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain.Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right to Access Your Personal Information and Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Changes Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and,under certain circumstances,to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed.Also,certain states afford you the right to request correction,amendment or deletion of your Personal Information.We reserve the right,where permitted by law,to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests.All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer • Fidelity National Financial,Inc. 4050 Calle Real,Suite 220 Santa Barbara,CA 93110. Multiple Products or Services If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more than one privacy notice from us.We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Beran,LLC 210 Fast Lincoln Bozeman,MT 59715 Tange Family,LLC 2800 Spring Meadows Drive Bozeman,MT 59715 Buffalo Ventures,LLC 17 Lockwood Drive Charleston,SC 29401 Saccoccia Lands 11,LLC 1234 Springhill School Road Belgrade,MT 59714 BLC Associates,LLC 5014 Elk Hills Court Missoula,MT 59803 Bridger Peaks Village Associates,LP 5014 Elk Hills Court Missoula,MT 59803 Bozeman Senior Housing,Inc. 2550 University Ave.,Suite 330N c/o Accessible Space,Inc, St Paul,MN 55114 ASI Bozeman 2550 University Ave.,Suite 330N St Paul,MN 55114 Big River Development Co.,Inc. 97 West 300 South Millville,UT 84326 NicalL LLC 1970 Stadium Drive,Suite C Bozeman,MT 59715 Durston Development Corp. 1970 Stadium Drive,Suite C Bozeman,MT 59715 OBD,Inc. 8200 Saddle Mountain Road Bozeman,MT.59715 C I COMPANY 1 ill U.F' v'f� Signature Date . , �.���,�� .��:.��� �.� ,.. . . . � .� . : _ . . . � ^� , � � �� . . \ �� . . . � � � : , � � � � i . ; { � � � ! � � � § �� . . � � \ . , @ . � / � � § x \ . . . A , \ \ j C� , _ � � �\ l � • � . ] . ' � � \ ' ) { , ] \ � � � - / £ � . � � / � . � ] [ � � . ) E � . ( � . � � \ / � � / : ) § � � . . . . . � ����.. �.�.��, , n� . . . as a }` ° � � . � — � ©����_�. . . w v. « - . ��.�a.���:.��� . z� .���y � v , . I -4 • I `1 �J X. �• ^`�^` /W/� Yd_ � � �, • APR 1 2006 "All • ALLIED WASTE SERVICES April 14, 2007 Morrison Maierle, Inc. Attn: Molly Skorpik 306 West Railroad St. Suite 105 Missoula,MT 59802 Re: PT Lands Commercial Development PUD/Subdivision._ MMI#3948.004.035.0510 Dear Ms. Skorpik: Allied Waste Services currently provides commercial garbage collection service in the immediate vicinity of this proposed subdivision. We foresee absolutely no problem in providing this service to the businesses located within this new subdivision. • Sincerely, / Harry Kirschenbaum Marketing Director 8600 Huffine,PO Box 10730 Bozeman,MT 59719 406.586.0606/ FAX 406.587.8909 www.disposal,com „ ? 3 ENGINEERS r: , MORRISA s , WENTISTS. I��1 .i��, '• 4 MAIERLE, INC, 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105-MISSOULA,MT 59802-406-542-868)-FAX:4 61-5 2-009 • An.Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Harry Kirschenbaum BFI Waste Services P.O. Box 10730 Bozeman, MT 59719 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Kirschenbaum: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial — planned unit development.subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Monta-a. The project site is ------ located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 111h Avenue and'east of N. 15'Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments for refuse collection at the project site. Your cxnments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Communit�i Impa::t Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. .The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11`Avenue, N. 141h Avenue, and N. 1 5t'Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 5r-2-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. r M* S k, PE `Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\BFI.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to o_hieve the r goals” .APR .19 20&n • April 18, 2006 Attn: Molly Skorpik,P.E. Morrison Maierle, Inc. 3011 Palmer Street Bozeman, Montana 59808 I have reviewed the plans for the proposed PT Lands Commercial PUD1Subdivision. Provided that all streets, buildings, entrances, etc. are logically marked and clearly lit, I see nothing which would obstruct the response of our ambulances. Urban sprawl is a concern for Emergency Medical Services throughout the nation. With the increased number of commercial lots,the demand for EMS needs will rise. In this particular location, Bozeman City Fire Department provides initial response. AMR has a contract to provide ALS ambulance coverage to the citizens in the city limits of Bozeman within 8 minutes 90%of the time. The average response time from Bozeman for an ALS ambulance to this location is—4 minutes. Our closest ambulance is located at 2101 Industrial Drive. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, _.. Kris Kaull, Operations Manager 2101 Industrial Drive,Bozeman,Montana 59715 Phone(406)586-0037 • Fax(406)586-0536 MOFMS6* ENGINEERS � � SCIENTISTS � :A K SURVEYORS `• _PLANNERS ?aERLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59302.406.542.8880 AX:40i-542.0009 • An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 American Medical Response 2101 Industrial Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 To Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a prcpcsed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street , Baxter Lane, west of N. 11th Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding the availability of ambulance service and response times to the project site. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N. 10 Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-9880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. WITy Skorpik, P Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Does\corres\Agen cy\Am erican_Medi cal.doc "Providing resources in portnership with clients to achieve their goals" 0 MONTANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY • 225 North Roberts c. P.O. Box 201201 ¢ Helena, MT 59620-1201 ¢ (406) 444-2694 o. FAX (406) 444-2696 o. www.montanahistoricalsociety..org o April 14, 2006 APR 2 0 2006 Molly Skorpik Morrison Maierle, Inc 306 W. Railroad Street Suite 105 Missoula MT 59802 r RE: PT LANDS COMMERCIAL PUD/SUBDIVISION, BOZEMAN. SHPO Project #: 2006041401 Dear Molly: I have conducted a cultural resource file search for the above-cited project located in Section 1, T2S R5E. According to our records there have been no previously recorded sites within the designated search locales. The absence of cultural properties in the area does not mean that they do not exist but rather may reflect the absence of any previous cultural resource inventory in the area, as our records indicated none. We feel that there is a low likelihood cultural properties will be impacted. We, therefore, feel that a recommendation for a cultural resource inventory is unwarranted at this time. However, should cultural materials be inadvertently discovered during this project we would ask that our office be contacted and the site investigated. We would ask that you contact Allyson Bristor at the Bozeman Historic Preservation Office for any concerns that she may have regarding this project. She may be reached at PO Box 1230, Bozemant MT 59771. Thank you for consulting with us. If you have any further questions or comments you may contact me at (406) 444-7767 of by e-mail at.dmurdo@mt.gov. Sincerely, Damon Murdo Cultural Records Manager cc:Allyson Bristor File: LOCAL/SUBDIVISIONS/2006 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE o 1410 86 Ave o. P.O. Box 201202¢Helena,MT 59620-1202 a (406)444-7715 o. FAX(406)444-6575 G MOPOSA + ECIEVI RS 4 SCIEN-ISTS L i =?� SURVE'!ORS PLANAERS i IUE PIE INC,T 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59802.40E-542-8880•FAX:406.542-0005 An Employee-Owned Company •' c '� ' April 1012006 Mr. Stan Wilmoth, State Archaeologist State Historical Preservation Office P.O. Box 201201 Helena, MT 59620-1201 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Wilmoth: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial - planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman, Montana. The- o ect si-e is locate P P ty P:" 1 - _ between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11U'Avenue and east of N. 154 Avenue. Currer.tly we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurart businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following road's:Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11t Avenue, N. 14"Avenue, and N. 15' Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden cr me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. olly Skorpik, PE Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\SHPO.doc "Providing resources in' partnership with clients to achieve tf eir goals" APR25 ZIB NorthVvestern corporation \oi estern Bozeman PJcrthWsion Energy Bozeman Division • 121 East Griffin Drive Ener Bozeman, SAT 59715 Telepho-ie: (405)582-4537 vwjnr.north westernenergy.com April 19, 2006 Morrison Maierle, Inc. Molly Skorpik, P.E. 306 West Railroad Street, Suite 105 Missoula,MT 59802 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI#3948.004.035.0510 Dear Molly, Please find attached a drawing indicating NorthWestern Energ,,-s requested easement and conduit locations. We are requesting a minimum twelve (12) foot easement along the areas indicated. In addition, we request three (3) culverts be placed at each street crossing identified. These culverts will consist of two (2) twelve (12) inch HDPE pipes, and one (1) eighteen(18) inch HDPE pipe. Also attached is a ccpy of our specifications for installing culverts. Please note, these easement locations are in accordance with NorthWestem Energy's design. Please contact the other utilities in the area for verify their needs. Feel free to contact me at(406)582-4646 should you have any cuestions. Sincerely, -,Y�� 4p— L � Nicole Eickelberg Division Engineer Enclosures cc: Bresnan Communications, Todd Jensen Qwest Communications, Lee Guinn Vivid Communications,Drew Petersen Utility Culvert Requirement FT LaO ,,A , Deliberate Separation L° ,- Vn �~� �u� Final Asphalt Gravel or Compacted Soil As Per Road Requirements .a•ice Additional Conduit for Gas Only " 4"Typical N-12 Double Wall Typically4'N-12 Double Wall 30 Corrugated Polyethylene Culvert Corrugated Polyethylene C.ilvert or Larger Per N.W.E. - :il._ With End Caps and Band with end caps and bands. " S:�f 7..'i:. — _---� �—_ is --...._.. - -- - . •-- x._ Cross Section j. _ I 2' Standard 60'R/W With Curb Blvd &Sidewalk Utility Easement - 7 i i , i Plan View NorffiWesteni Electric Construction Standards-Distribution Underground STANDARD NO. a g TRENCH SPECIFICATIONS & 30-C-8 REV No.o 01/01/3006 TRENCH EXAMPLES-UTILITY CULVERT 01/01/2006 Sht. 3 of ENGINEERS MOMS(* SCIENTISTS =• ( SURVEYORS ( PLANNERS I I MAIERLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,NIT 59802.406-542-8880•FAX:406.542-0009 • An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Randy Sullivan Northwestern Energy P.O. Box 490 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Sullivan: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane,.west of N. 11th Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding the availability of utility ser✓ice to the projecfsite. WE are keenly interested in required utility easements and conduit locations for future extensions. Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. . This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or myself at 542-8880 with.any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Mir* Skorpik, P Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Northwestem.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" APR 2 5 2006 1A OFFICE OF � GALLATIN COUNTY , MONTANA James R. Cashell April 13, 2006 Sheriff Jim Oberhofer Undersheriff Warren Hiebert Attn: Molly Skorpik, PE Chaplain Morrison Maierle, INC. 615 South 16th 306 West Railroad Street, Suite 105 Bozeman, Montana 59715 Missoula, MT 59802 (406) 582-2100 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision FAX (406) 582-2126 (Tract 2A of COS 1215F, Section 1, T2S R5E, P.M.M., Gallatin County) Dear Molly: In response to your request to review the above referenced commercial subdivision. The subdivision contains 13 commercial lots. As the Sheriff for Gallatin County, I am obligated to protect and serve the citizens of our county. As such I must constantly evaluate the service that my office is able to supply to the citizens in order to meet my duties. Currently, the Gallatin County Sheriff's Office employs 43 deputies including the undersheriff and myself. The Gallatin County Sheriff's Office averages 2.5 deputies per shift. My office must patrol, respond to crisis, make arrests, investigate crimes, process warrants, serve civil court papers, transport prisoners, attend to the court's protection, and investigative and administrative costs. This is not an all-encompassing list by any means. We are operating with some very real safety issues due to the inadequate number of deputies available on any given shift. Recently, in consideration of the insufficient number of deputies, the Gallatin County Sheriff's Office could not provide an acceptable level of service. This issue has been escalating due to the population growth in Gallatin County. Given these concerns, my staff and I have been working with developers and county officials to arrive at a reasonable method of mitigating the impact of new development on law enforcement issues in Gallatin County without penalizing new development. Our present response times run between 10 to 30 minutes, depending on the geographical location of the deputy at the time of the call. We are presently conducting a staffing analysis to determine the staffing requirements for the Sheriffs Office for the next five years. The 2003 Census reports that Gallatin County has 72,000 residents. The number is conservative simply based upon the fact the count was conducted two (2) years ago. In 0 0 addition, it does not include commuters or tourists in Gallatin County on any given day. For purposes of my analysis, I relied upon the 72,000 residents as a conservative number of citizens with Gallatin County. Safety statistics show that for adequate law enforcement, there should be 1.5 sworn deputies for every 1000 people. Again to remain conservative in my analysis, I used the ratio of 1 deputy for every 1000 people. Also for purposes of this calculation I assumed,based upon national statistics, that an average home is occupied by 2.5 people. The cost of placing a deputy sheriff on patrol in Gallatin County is $113,170 in the first year. Year 2 is $74,882, Year 3 is $77,641, Year 4 is $80,465 and year 5 costs are estimated at $83,470. These costs include, but are not limited to, employee, overtime, employer contributions, trai_ndng, a vehicle, computer, uniforms and vests, appropriate equipment, and insurance. The cost of placing a deputy sheriff on patrol and the formula will be reviewed every three (3) years or as needed to reflect significant changes that may occur. In order to determine an appropriate mitigation of your proposed subdivision's impact on law enforcement, I used the following formula: RESIDENTIAL CALCULATIONS: # of units x 2.5 persons per residential units =, persons (times).$89.82 ($89,815/1,000) = residential mitigation for subdivision; COMMERCIAL CALCULATIONS: Commercial Factor uses the rate of 1/3 the Residential Factor. This is based on commercial paying 1/3 of tax bills and decreased utilization of Sheriffs services by commercial properties compared to the value of their property. I recognize that as homes and commercial properties are built, Gallatin County will receive increased tax revenue from your development. The formula that is used takes this into consideration. The formula only addressed the patrol-oriented functions of my office and does not address many of the other functions that are mandated by the statutes of Montana. The taxes generated from your development will go toward payment of these other costs. Based on the information provided the mitigation for this development is: Year 1 $ 1,226.00 Year 2 $ 811.22 Year 3 $ 841.11 Year 4 $ 871.71 Year 5 $ 904.26 TOTAL $ 4,654.30 This payment will mitigate this subdivision's impact on law enforcement in Gallatin County. The total amount must be paid in order to obtain final plat approval for the subdivision. If you have any questions about this,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, J es R. Cashell, Sheriff allatin County,Montana 3 r. f • '�' ENGINEERS SCIENTISTS moms* `."•�li,.> SURVEYORS ' kW 6 t HAERLE, iNc. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59802.406.545-8880•FAX:406-5Q-0009 • An Eniployee-Owned Company v. April 11, 2006 Sheriff Cashwell 615 South 16th Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Sheriff Cashwell: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11'Avenue anc east of N.-151,Avenue: Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. We are keenly interested in required easements for utilities and conduit locations for future utility extensions. Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot. 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads::Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N. 14m Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Ily orpik, PE r 'ect Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat . M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Sheriffs—Dept.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to cchieve their goals" • CITY OF BOZEMA IRE DEPARTMENT DEPARTMEN F PUBLIC SAFETY if P.O. Box 1230 • Bozeman, Montana • 59771-1230 Phone (406) 582-2350 • Fax (406) 582-2355 • TDD (406) 582-2301 April 21, 2006 Molly Skorpik, PE Morrison Maierle, Inc. 306 West Railroad Street, Suite 105 Missoula, Montana 59802 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Dear Ms. Skorpik: Thank you for your letter of April 11, 2006, requesting Bozeman Fire Department comment on your project. We consider your application to'be infill and, as such, we are able to provide standard fire and life safety services consistent with tie propery surrounding your project. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Chuck Winn Fire Chief CW/pw Cc: Greg Megaard, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal v:'T'fVe,6j PgVj* Td,.n� fiat • public education • disaster and emergency services €' ENGINEERS y r MOMSM . SCIENTISTS ` '�_� SURVEYORS PLANWRS �€iA MAJERLE, INc. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET SUITE 105 MISSOULA,MT 59802.406.542-8880•FAX:4 6-542-0i009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Chuck Winn, Fire Chief City of Bozeman Fire Dept. P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59971 RE: PT Lands Commercial PLID/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI#3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Winn: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial _planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11t'Avenue and east df-N. 15''Avenue. -" Currently we are soliciting comments regarding the availability of fire p,otection and response times to the project site. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11t'Avenue, N. 14'Avenue, and N. 15'Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 wi Th any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. only S orpik, P Project Engin cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corresWgency\Fire—Dept.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to cchieve their :goals 11AY 0 1 Ovottata Tiskq a WtWe varj@ 1400 South 191h Ave Bozeman, MT 59718 April 27, 2006 Molly Skorpik, PE Morrison Maierle, Incorporated 306 West Railroad Street, Suite 105 Missoula, MT 59802 Dear Ms. Skorpik, I reviewed the preliminary site plan and preliminary plat you sent for the proposed PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision in Bozeman (MMI #3948.004.035.0510). 1 received this information from you on April 12, 2006 in correspondence dated April 11, 2006. After review, I would only remind you at this point, as always, to minimize or avoid any activity near surface waters that could alter stable stream configurations, that could otherwise threaten bank integrity, or that could create a need for bank stabilization of any type in the future. You should avoid disturbing riparian vegetation. And you should avoid situations that might deliver pollutants to surface waters,-as can happen for example when paved surfaces concentrate oil or other petroleum products later mobilized by rain or snowmelt. Drainage within the subdivision is a critical consideration to avoid increasing sediment or other contaminants that might be.delivered to the local watershed. I anticipate that your construction plans will include actions to reduce or mitigate sediment delivery, and to prevent discharges of petroleum products or other harmful substances into nearby streams, ditches, or to lands capable of delivering these substances to nearby waterways. An important project goal should be to ensure that the completed subdivision poses no direct or persistent environmental threat to the local watershed. We will have opportunity to discuss details of your proposed stream crossings and other stream impacts during the Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310) Permit process. I appreciate this opportunity to comment on your proposal. I hope that my remarks are useful to you at this time. I look forward to hearing how your project plans develop. Please contact me with any questions. Sin er y, ;. el To WP Fis ri Biologist 406-994-6938 jtohtz ,state.mt.us MOFMS ., ENGINEERS LA,� ,� + SCIENTISTS SURVEYOFS NEFS MAIERLE, m. PLA -000306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SU:TE 105•MIS50ULA,MT 5980E•40i•542-888D�FA.X:406.542.00[9 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Joel Tohtz Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks 1400 South 19"Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr Tohtz: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11'Avenue and east of N. 15`"Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaura--it businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are anticipated from trail construction, Baxter widening, extension of Tschache Lane and possibly from smrm water detention. It is our plan =o mitigate these impacts through the development of constructed wetlands onsite, all of which will remain as part of the open space. Minimal stream work is anticipated with the notable exception being the Tschache Lane crossings of Walton Stream Ditch and Mandeville Creek. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. M y Skorpik, PE Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\OD4\Docs\corres\Agency\MT—FWP.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" entana Department of Transportation Jim Lynch, Director serving you with pride 2701 Prospect Avenue Brian Schweitzer, Governor PO Box 201001 • Helena MT 59620-1001 April 25, 2006 Molly Skorpik Project Engineer Morrison Maierle, Inc. 306 West Railroad St. Suite 105 Missoula, MT 59802 Subject: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Thank you for submitting information on the subject development. • The Montana Department of Transportation(MDT) looks forward to reviewing the Traffic Impact Study, drainage plans and proposed roadway improvements for the subject development. Please pass this information on to this office as scon as possible so that we can begin our review process. If you have any questions,please don't hesitate to call me at (406) 444-4383. Thank you for your cooperation. Ed Ereth, System Impact Action Supervisor Rail, Transit at: Planning Division Copies: Ross Gammon, Bozeman Area Maintenance Chief Bob Murray, City of Bozeman File Program&Policy Analysis Bureau An Equal Opportunity Employer .flail, Transit and Planning Division Phone: (406)444-3423 T-e. (800)335-7592 Fax. (406)444-7671 Web Page: www.mdt.state.mt.us MOFMS(* SCIENTISTS ENGINEERS . LASURVEYORS a MAIERLE, INC. PLANNERS 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 5982.406-542.888C FAX:406.542.0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Montana Department of Transportation Ed Ereth Planning Division 2701 Prospect Avenue Helena, MT 59626 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 To Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a pr000sed commercial-- planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana.. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11'Avenue and east of N. 151h Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your early t-.oughts regarding the • proposed Baxter widening are greatly appreciated. Your comments reca-ding the proposed Baxter widening and required MDT permit process will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11'hAvenue, N. 14t'Avenue, and N. 15'h Avenue. Please-forward any comments via mail and feel free to.contact Keith Belden or meat 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Mkorpik, PE tt Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\MDOT-Helena.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to ach eve their goals" "Committed to the protection and promotion of public healthMAY 0 V 2006 Ch' Am lddb& oG Ty�`�! -County01th Department allatin City - # o =_: # Human Services Environmental Health Services • °t�---- - ''�, s 12 N. 3rd Ave 311 West Main,Room 108 �r� o "erF°F 406-582Bozeman3100 59715 FAX 406-582-3112 406 582 31 0 59715 406-582-3128 CO. w www.gallatin.mt.gov/health May 2,2006 Molly Skorpik, PE Morrison-Maierle, Inc 306 West Railroad Street Suite 105 Missoula, MT 59802 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI#3948.004.035.0510 Dear Ms. Skorpik: • GCCHD has received the preliminary proposal for the above referenced project. Since the project will be provided water and sewer by the City of Bozeman and you are citing the Municipal Facilities Exemption, GCCHD has no farther comments-,egarding the proposal. If you have any questions regarding this letter,please feel free to contact me at(406) 582-3120. Sincerely, Ross Knapper, S Environmental Health Specialist Gallatin City-County Health Department i F:\Sub\PT Lands Commercial PUD let 050206.doc MOFMSAENGINEERS SCIENTISTS LA -.SURVEYORS PLANNERS [ALA �ElLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STFE=7-SUITE135-MISSOULA,MT59802-40E-54-­S880�•FAX:4'013-542-0009 • An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Ross Knapper Gallatin County Environmental Health Department 311 W. Main, Room 108 Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Knapper: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary piat for a proposed commercial planned unit development su-bdivisio-n in the City of Bo-eman, Montana. The prc'ect sire-is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11"Avenue and-east of N. 15t'Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. This project will be served by city water and sewer. Your comments on this and other issues willbe incorporatec into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May • 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, ho:'el. and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases wi'h construction of Lot 9 a-ld Lot 14 occurring first. Water and sewer will be provided to the site via-:he extension of put lic water mains. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Willy SIforpik, P� Project Engi Vr cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner 'Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan • Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Environ—Health.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" of Bozo � THE CITY OF BOZE*IV MAY 15 2006 20 E.OLIVE—P.O.BOX 1230 BOZEMAN,MONTANA 59771-1230 << 1883 � BOZEMAN AREA BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD 9T,N co. VO PHONE: (406)582-2250—FAX: (406)582-2263 E-MAIL: bikeboard®bozeman.net MEMORANDUM TO: KEITH BELDEN,MMI-MISSOULA,OFFICE MANAGER FROM: JON HENDERSON,BICYCLE ADVISORY BOARD RE: PT LANDS COMMERCIAL PUD/SUBDIVISION COMMENTS DATE: MAY 2ND,2006 Below are comments from the Bozeman Area Bicycle Advisory Board (BABAB)regarding the PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision. • The Bicycle Advisory Board recommends placement of a Bike Lane on all collectors within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision. N. l I"and N. 156 should include a Bike Lane on both sides of the road as these will be built to the collector road standard—all of which include a Bike Lane according to Figure 11-7 in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan. The proposed meandering trail on the north side of Tschache should be built to a ten-foot,paved, shared-use-path standard. This shared-use-path will connect to a similar proposed facility to the west of 19th and will provide a safe alternative for children traveling east to west. All of these facilities will serve an important role in the development of Bozeman. Preference should be given towards connecting existing and future bike corridors. It is also critical that we provide safe alternative transportation options to both commuters and school children alike. . Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. J • „; ENGINEERS 111 MO1 LL�1SA , SCI=NTISTS' _. SUR E'iORS L WA, MMERLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET SUITE 105•KSKULA;NIT 59802.406-542.8380 FAX:40 L°NfJE0R9 • An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Jon Henderson Bicycle Advisory Board P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59971 RE: PT Lands Commercial PLID/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Henderson: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary p'at for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman:, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N..1.1"Ave-ue and_east of N. 15"Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Trails are a crucial component-.f this project and will require careful consideration to design standards and location to minim za impacts to wetlands and to eliminate unnecessary parallel trail syst_ms. Your comments o-i this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact • Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, wanking, hotel, and restarwrant businesses. The project would be completed in phases wits construction of Lot 9 and Lost 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street,Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N. 14th Avenue, and N. 15"Avenue. In accordance with City Planning recommendations,we propose a meandering trail on the nortrr side of Tschache Lane. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact.Keith 3elden or myself at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Pliolly Skorpik, PE Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Bicycle_Advisory_Board.doc "Providing resources in partnership with c ien--s to achieve.their g-a s" • �`. MOMS01T ' ENGINEER` A SCIENTI T�� SURVEYORS p�����y,��I::5^ INC. LANNERS J ` `' ?aERLE, 11V 1. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105.MISSOULA,MT 59802.406-542-8880•FAX:406.542.0009 -. ._ An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Mr. George Durkin Gallatin County Road Department 201 West Tamarack Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Durkin: Please find enclosed a preliminary site_plan and prelin`inary plat fora proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11th Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments from the County Road Department regarding this project. Your comments will • be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses: The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N. 14't'Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Zo y rpik, Pect It ' ee cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Does\corres\Agency\County_Road_Dept.doc- "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals r~+ moms(f a ENGINEERS E ,• �;K;j , SCIENTISTS fs; -' SURVEYORS MAJERLE, INNPLANNERS �- 11V li 306 WEST RAILROAD 37REET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59802.406.542-8880•FAX:406.542.0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Mr. Craig Campbell DNRC-Bozeman Unit 2273 Boot Hill Court, Suite 110 Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Campbell: „-Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the-City of 66zem6n, Montana: The project site,is -- ""- located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N.. 11th Avenue and east of N. 157.h Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. As with past projects in this area, the City of Bozeman may recommend that well water be used for landscape irrigation. Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completicn mid-May 2006. .This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N. 14th Avenue, and N. 151h Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. ;fill ly Sk rpik, PE Project Engine cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File . Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\33948\004\Does\corres\Agen cy\D N RC.d oc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve th.�ir goals" ` MORRISA ENGINEERS . SCIENTISTS SURVEYORS PLANNERS LA I; KMERLE, iNc. 306 WEST RAILROAD S-REET+SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 5980?-4G-542-8880-FAX:406-542-009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Bozeman School District Ed Sondeno 404 W. Main Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comme-it MMI #3948.004.035 0510 Dear Ed: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat=or a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City.of Bozeman, -Montana.' The project site is— located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. I I"Avenue and east of N. 151h Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your comments Dn this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phase3 with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be availatle from tie following roads: Baxter Lane; Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11`hAvenue,.N. 14th Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Molly orpik, PE Pr eyct Engineer. cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson;Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\School Disthct.doc "Providing resources in Partnership with c ients _o achieve their goals" y u t ENGINEERS MOMS01 SCIENTISTS �_� SURVEYORS �'v: INC. ANNERS i3� . , , MAIERLE, 11 V 1., 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59802.406-542-E800•FAX:406.542.0009 An Employee-Owned Company April11, 2006 Ron LeCain Wetlands Advisory Board 211 North Grand Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI#3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. LeCain: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat fc;r a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman, Montana. The project sire is'located-- - - -- between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11"Avenue and easi of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your comments will: be incorporated into the • Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. An investigation of the wetlands on site suggests that all wetlands are jurisdictional. Impacts to wetlands are anticipated from trail construction, Baxter widening,extension of Tschache Lane and possibly from storm water detention: It is our plan io miti;3ate these impacts through the development of constructed wetlands onsite, all of which will remain as part of the open space. Minimal stream work is anticipated with the notable exception being the Tschache Lane crossings of Walton Stream Ditch and Mandeville Creek. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Beden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Mefry Skorpik, Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:13948\004\Does\corres\Agency\Wetlands Advisory.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients :.o achieve their goals" E^eGINEER3 t ' SCIENTI375 MORRIS(il 3URVEYORS , ' MAIERLE, INC. -542-`09 I:'�1. �? 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET SUITE 105 MISSOULA MT 59602.4C&•5a2.8880 AK:40e642.00R An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Ralph Zimmer-TCC Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee 2106 South Tracy Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Zimmer: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. 'The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11th Avenue and east of N. 1It'Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your com,Ti6nts will be inc&pofa ed—-`-- -- into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Sta:emeri_scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial real, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be.availabie from t^e folloWing roads: Baxter Lane„ Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11"Avenue, N. -141h Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. In accordance with City Planning recommendations,we propose a meandering trail on the north side of Tschache Lane. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to cor.taot Kei�h Be den o rre at 542-888C with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Mtcje Sr k, PE t En �ineer PC: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer. Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:1394810041DocslcorreslAgency\Traffic Pedestian_Safety.doc "Providing resources in partnership Sikh clien�:s :o achieve :heir goals" 0 ENGINEERS MORRIS(fSCIENTISTS 1 SURVEYORS I��( MMERLE, INC. PLANNERS � t�' 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET SUITE 105.1.11SSDULA,MT 5,.80� 406-542-8660•FAX:406542.0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Mr. Ryon Stover Bozeman Forestry Department P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Stover: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan, and preliminary plat for proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is_ - -- located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 1'th Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments from the Bozeman Forestry Departme-nt regarding this project. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retain, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the followirng roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11`hAvenue, N. 14"Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. /A <� MDIIy Skbrpik, P Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Bozeman—Forestry.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients-to achi,-.--✓e their goals" t_..tl, • # �+ MORMS ENGIMEERS mk •A' SCIEN'ISTS SURVEYORS r PLANNERS > � MMERLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SLIFE 105•MISSOULA MT HEM 403-E43-cEE0•FAX.:i)6-54Z-0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Montana Department of Transportation Planning Division 2701 Prospect Avenue Helena, MT 59626 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 To Whom It May Concern:: Please find enclosed a.preliminary.site..plan and preliminary plat for a proposEd_cc,mmercia! planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11th Avenue and east of N. ?51h Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your early thoughts regarding the proposed Baxter widening are greatly appreciated. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for competon mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercia' retail, Car.-king, hotel, and re3taurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with constrL:ction of _ct 9 an '. Lot 1z occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the foliowing roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N.. 14th Avenue, anti `�,. 15tn Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, . Morrison-Maierle, Inc. ,Ally Skorpik, PE . . Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File . Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\MDOT-Helena.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve trair goals" rr tKIIEERS MORMS04k - iz-DEVISTS � ����i ,� • 1. MAIERLE, 11VC P�-42 306 WEST PJ,ILF A STR-7•SU TE 305•MISS30ULF,b i SSE02 406-542.88K•FAX:-10&6 1-0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Sheriff Cashwell 615 South 161h Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUDISubdivision Request for Comment MMI#3948.004.035.0510 Dear Sheriff Cashwell: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a pnoposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Boz_man, Mon.an.a. The project site s located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. -11'Avenue and eas of N. 15t�Avenue-- __ -- - Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Vje are keenly interested in required easements for utilities and conduit local-ns for future utility extensions. Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-Mav 200�,*. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail. banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. -11tt'Avenue, N. 14P Avenue, and N. 15th A,renue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to ccntact Keith Belden,or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. o f Sko pik, PE Project E ginee cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Cevelopar Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Ag ency\Sh a riffs_De yid cc "Providing resources in partnership U-6-.h dier;ts to achieve their ENGINEERS ri4 MORM SA "t{ SCIENTISTS LA SURVEYORS PANERS AUERLE, INC.jC 306 WEST RAILROAD STREE'i•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59802.406.542.8880•FAX:4 6L542N 009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Randy Sullivan Northwestern Energy P.O. Box 490 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Sullivan: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bcz?nan. :Montana. The project site is located --- between Oak Street,.Baxter Lane,-west of N. 11 'Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue._Currently we are soliciting comments regarding the availability of utility service to the project site. WE are keenly interested in required utility easements and conduit locations for future extensions: Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environrnental Assessment • Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or myself at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Mol�korpik, PE Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manacer File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Northwestem.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to achieve their goals" ENGINEERS �r MOMS01 SCIENTISTS • LASURVEYORS MlAdEaE� I C. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT 59802.406-542.8880•FAX.,4 61-542 0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Mr. Mark Tymrak, Director of Public Safety Department of Public Safety 615 South 161h Avenue Bozeman, MT 59715 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Tymrak: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11'Avenue and east of N. 15t'Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding the availability of police protection and response times to the project site. Your comments will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads:.Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11'hAvenue, N. 10 Avenue, and N. 15'h Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, ' 4 Morrison-Maierle, Inc. - rl Mo Skorpik, P P oject Engineer Y cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office - File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan I r .y is Preliminary Plat77 �y ..{ .Y .�n.. 41 M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Public_Safety.doc "Providing resources in partnership- W-icri-cii'ents ro-achieve their goals" k ENGINEERS Moms t � L SCIENTISTS INC. SURVEYORS IUERLE, I 'CANNERS 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET SUITE 105•MISSOULA,MT •406.542-8880•FAX:406.542-0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Qwest Communications 2707 West Main Street Bozeman, MT 59718 RE: PT Lands Commercial PLID/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI#3948.004.035.0510 To Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a prposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman, Montana. I he project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 11th Avenue and east of N. 15t.'Avenue: Currently -- - we are soliciting comments regarding the availability of utility service to the-project_site. We are keenly interested in required utility easements and conduit locations for future extensions. Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion Enid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with constructicr. of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenLe, N. 141h Avenue, and N. 15"Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden cr me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. OM y Skorpik, PE roject Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Qwest.doc "Providing resources in Partnership with clients to achieve their goals" i. i• ENGINEERS r MOMS1 SCIENTISTS • LA " SURVEYCRS ?? PLAN-AERS MAIERLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 105•RS'SOULA,MT 59802.406.542-8880•FAX:406-542-0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Farmers Canal Company P.O. Box 4065 Bozeman, MT 59772-4065 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 To Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman, Montana. The project site is --- - located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west oI.I'J.. A 1'h Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Stormwater will be detained in onsite detention ponds and released at pre-developed rates into Walton's Stream/Ditch (Farmers Canal) and Mandeville Creek. Your commen s on this and other issues will be • incorporated into the Environmental Assessment C::)n:munity Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail,, banking, hotel, and restau ant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Minimal disturbance to Walton's stream/ditch is anticipated at the future intersection of North 15t'Avenue and Tschache Lane. Please advise to the level of involvement regarding any proposed modifications. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Molly Skorpik, Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer • Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site.Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Farmers—Canal—Company.doc "Providing resources in Partnership witl- clients to�ochieve their goals" NGIAEERE MOMS SCIENTISTS • I SURVEYCRE a..vs r K)VEFIE, INC. . PLANNERS •-�''���� 3G6 WEST RAILROAD STaEET•SATE •MI�.�OIJVi.MT 59802.4G&•542-888G•-fAX:A6-E42-Qx15 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Jon Henderson Bicycle Advisory Board P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59971 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Henderson: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary plat for a proposed commercial planned unit development subdivision in the City of Bozeman. Montana. The project site is — -- located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N, 1 lth Avenue and east of N. 15th Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project, Trails are a crucial component of this project and will require careful consideration to design stEndards and location to minimize impacts to wetlands and to eliminate unnecessary parallel trail systems. Your comments on this • and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banking, hotel, and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lot 9 and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street,-N. 11tr'Avenue, N. 14t'Avenue, and N. 15th Avenue. In accordance with City Planning recommendations, we propose a meandering trail on the north side of Tschache Lane. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free tc contact Keith Belden or myself at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. olly Skorpik, PE Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager • File . Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\Agency\Bicycle—Advisory_Board.doc "Providing resources in partnership with chenr-s to t.chieve.thei­ goals" MGM ElJGINEEFS SCIENTISTSs1k I r,s [i s �+ 3MVEYCFS • I: ir:,Yk7 fM `:LANNEFS MAIERLE, INC. 306 WEST RAILROAD STREET•SUITE 1 5•N1SS OULA,MT SC602.406-5.12-38@G•EA;:403-542-0009 An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Ted Lange Gallatin Valley Land Trust P.O. Box 7021 Bozeman, MT 59771 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment MMI #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Lange: Please find enclosed a preliminary site plan and preliminary pl .t for a proposed ccnnmercial planned unit development subdivision in the City.of Bozemar:,!Montana. _The project site a located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 111''Avenue an- east of N. 15"Aveau-6. _ Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Trails are a crucial componert of this project and will require careful consideration to design standards and location to :-nrlimize • impacts to wetlands and to eliminate unnecessary parallel trail systems. Your comments on this and other issues will be incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact Statement scheduled for completion mid-May 2006. . This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, balking, hotel, are restauran= businesses. The project would be completed in phases wi-h cons-ruction of Lo- and Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the following roads: Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11`Avenue, N_ 14'Avenue, and N. 15'Avenue. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me at 542-8880 with any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. olly Skorpik, PE Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer . Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager File Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat . M:\3948\004\Does\corres\Agency\Gallabn_Land Trust.doc "Providing resources in partnership with clients to -_achieve the i- gaols" ENG,NSEES. SCIEVfIS:S L J! Momsm� SURVEYORS. LJ� MAIERLE, INC. s,�LANNEf,S I'�' � 306 WEST RAILROAD STRE7•SUITE 1D,5•ti11SS�UL,1,A�6�02.40a•542.8380•=A.Y.:486-542-0009. An Employee-Owned Company April 11, 2006 Mr. Dennis Loreth NRCS-Headwaters Natural Resource Area 3710 Fallon Street, Ste. B Bozeman, MT 59718 RE: PT Lands Commercial PUD/Subdivision Request for Comment M M 1 #3948.004.035.0510 Dear Mr. Loreth: Please find enclosed a-preliminary-site plan and preliminary plat for a Fro_posec ccmmmercial planned unit development subdivision in City of Bozeman. Montana. The project site is located between Oak Street, Baxter Lane, west of N. 111th Avenue and east of N. 1:5t'Avenue. Currently we are soliciting comments regarding this project. Your comments on.s c-il types wia be • incorporated into the Environmental Assessment Community Impact S atement scheduled or completion mid-May 2006. This project includes the development of typical commercial retail, banicing, hotel,and restaurant businesses. The project would be completed in phases with construction of Lo 9 anc Lot 14 occurring first. Public access to the site would be available from the follcwing roads: Eaxter Lane, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, N. 11thAvenue, N. 14t'Avenue, and N. 15•r Avenue.. Please forward any comments via mail and feel free to contact Keith Belden or me a 542-8880 wish any questions. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Molly 5korpik, Project Engineer cc: Jerry Perkins, Landowner Dave Hutchinson, Developer Keith Belden, MMI-Missoula, Office Manager- File • Attachment: Preliminary Site Plan Preliminary Plat M:\3948\004\Docs\corres\AgencyNNRCS.doc "Providing resources in partnership with _.I ents to ach eve =he - 9cols" �NE �'c\ -:\.,O�q� iric rnc>_,atvur.ru�i ri.ni yr PT LNORT MAJOR SUBDIVISION NO. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR 511 NORTH 5971E AVE. ® ./�, ' t J . ` I.KFa1f S.BFIDDI.A Prolee.Ierhol En9lrwr Surveyor.der hw by owury tt.t aem-th. BOZEMAN. MT 59715-3757 at.t;\\ A TRACT OF LAND BEING TRACT 2A OF COS 1215F LOCATED I maw„of April«,d oe,aa•,,Zoos,I e°,.,,I yINOR SU13DM ON NO. aM plen•d the i `� xSECTION 1, T2S,R5E, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA „p,� •he-n en tn.aarampo.,ying prat ma o.aeueda•d I.oammane.el.proa.bm d she ENGINEER - < �. ,. \r \ Suedhri•ian aM R,W q AL Section 76-� IOI Uveugn 78-]-a25.ILG/.,oM uw MORRISON-MAIERLE. INC. �� :rr.•- _�•�.�,Ka-:=�1. I *��-:p, \.\\ B'uemon suml.l:on R.gubuone. MIS W. RAILROAD ST. SUITE 105 __ ,-,�„:. MISSOUTA, MT 59802 �'a `� r•�"`�-...� _ 3-s'�+ \ Da<•a tNe day e/ z . `<`•y: �� FOUND NORTH 1/4 SEC710N 1 ' 3-INCH AL IM91UM CAP Kash S.Bwen PURPOSE \i rt•� � __ j �" \\ FOUND 3'u...- TO CREATE 4 LOTS FOR FUTURE PROJECT /to692 6 DEVELOPMENT. AREA - .� „r -�'• �` \ CERTIFICATE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS q� \.` m.°r.,yoro�rana or en.rRv,y w otro.;a rwn«,.Yty. ..M�avie Power,° mgea.•o m e I....%i- I , '." sy=:: `•E1j R. �� 569'16'47'E u to tn.public,fh.dgnt to tlh.joint u.of o .meet mr u,.eemvuation,-.income•. 20.94' n emir am nm 1 of their fins«,a ou,.r f°Witia in•o+v under oat oem...adh area i'., 'a ' 'i.- - _ a•1 \\` o eVrated on Nu plat m-P.Wk UWH Emwrrnt•W hen and to MW larwv. HD- i '. y� - M-1 M.d N� day dl 200.5. VICINITY MAP I r �: ',_` csoe� e' '�\a(r'\\\` JEB1ty PERK Ns CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION NOT TO SCALE r- "'. _-',;:-`_ _-_�! �`. �! \ �'�.. 6Q• `'�' I CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS 1, the undersigned property owner, do hereby certify that I have caused to be surveyed, �hN L•�`'J M�.`^'-[��� I.'� ' y \ fi--. .� �� L.IERRr PERKINS.bnd°.r,.r,end L IOnN S.8¢OFJ1.o r.9i.b..d prorr.imol rglnr Itvr,..e b subdivided and platted into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, and other divisions and c,�•v'�')tic .I - •' -_ I �_ '{_- ''C� 4� ♦r 1Yti preatlm in me stow of•brnano.rhw.by Drury teat the lalbwnh9 Imwwwmrhb.r.autrea m dedications, as shown by the plat hereunto included, the following described tract of B-L 1:� _ Yi-'ti) ;�_ '�-' - / ' '\ " _ _ - ``'Y�4-, �� nI mr,dlri«,e of approwl of MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. !nw r..,trvtdre«Rnonaoq land. to wit: I \�`. T'M _ • {'\-.' _ .clew, o guorm,t.,d In eaordarra.itn tM aDPra••d Non.«,°.p.dflmtom:Watr,Sewn,Dmirro9e.Stn•aq s'-. i.: rL�J�.�---' \ _- _ v,FT -•�.a�1. \, su.•1 Sqm.Sw..aua.a Ughung. ' � �! `� '� .j _ ��''-- \. --3^'•. .�` - R,•,abdivid.r Irreey wmrvate a9obvl dat.cb In thew MProwm.nb f«a Pwiod of one year tram MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. T•y .'y;.. o eat.or ooupranu at tress Imprww,vm.by 1M aH d Bo:wh,on.Tb auoei•iu,groat.pa�ldn •-' J ,-,�\ 1`J"..--� - ..� _.._� Y.-L.�\ N o1 all pueYc i,,munnctun 4,enenb to tM CRY of 8o ,and 1M City-by oomph ` - ---=,_'- �:-•-• �'/f Y'� y yof ou pudic ietro uueuoe Impowr.r,b.•vb).ct to tee abo•.Ini i°wd Iona dy. A tract of land being Trait 2A of C.O.S. 1215F, located in Section 1, Township 2 South. { l- , -` Range 5 East. P.M.Y.. City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montano and more particularly I +yl\�: e J:..rr` �--y�' i - `� _ described as follows: `'f• - r �--" LOT 1 9 9 I \: .;r, I - �'�.�/ \� 21.86 aces. _ I 7pJ��f,l,` Keith S.BMmn, 1D892 ES Dale Commencing at the Center Y. comer ai said Section 1;'thence N 8T55'37' W, aloe the. - �' east West midsection line of said Section 1, a distance o1 92O.OD feet to the southeast \` dgrr comer of said Tract 2A. said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence N � \ \\\\\„ D•ine H.-9 Date 8T55'37'W continuing along said midsection line• a distance of 472.47 feet to the �f, m ?ry v- _ �'i fh` \ \ \`-\ �- i .�,rDirest.of Publb S.rvie., southwest comer of said edict 2yv Thence N OT22'22' E o distance of 2482.03 feet to l \` ` _ - 1`--i'; all of Beaman the southery right of way Baxter Lane; Thence along said southerly right of way through ' the following eoumn: �' /'j ,. �- \ _ _ i E: .- ` STATE or ) Thence along an arc to the right a distance of 119.51 feet• said arc having o delta ,\V`�' •c_, _\�. �, �- `-Y `�_--� I•• Opyyry yF )�• angle of 9'0604• a radius of 752-41 feet• a chord bearing of S 58'30'23- E. and a I\ �`i:' _� �,/'/ =C _,>•yr74 \ _ ,,�• _� chord length of 119.39 feet; •� ]-�\` ; ( _ O`'\�\1•P �_ :4`�^,m 1 I 7N.hawn,r,t.m aela,owrdq.d talon m.an 2005, Thence S 53'S7'21' E o distance of 521.08 feet; J p. Thence aloe an arc to the left a distance of 104.70 feet, said arc havinga delta I =�"+a '+• �' �l \ G� • ^• -_' _ _R'• � by JERRY PERKINS m el Pr la.u1, angle of 1'22'30', o radius of 4362-30 feet, a chord bearing of S 54'3B'36- E. and o ' j1` / I . / / A^E�'p�'4 ti° `%'`�,`- - •�•Y --i�m>- o l4antar,a ger,erd pertnwaNp chord length of 104.69 feet; --i' I Natey Public for the state d Thence S 69'16'47- E a distance of 20.94 feet; ,+,}" ��?,�„�.,<• lI 'y. \` L. Thence along an arc to the left o distance of 584.88 feet, said arc hoeing o delta - _ 1 '' -y!r'e \- .. �'• i� '��.` 1L�•t O I ys� Balding at angle of T4l'27', a radius of 4357.30 feel• a chord bearing of S 59'26'37"E, end a +\", ;( �._w,�:. 58T�1-'13'E - hoabtcaNinro`a chord length of 584.44 feet; _ ,+�--�_o„ _- ;pj_•I �?I Ws`N° My eommlab,..pima Thence S 63'17'20' E a distance of 232.77 feet to the north-south midsection line; gt„t.e name of=wry Thence leaving Baxter Lane right of way, S 01'42'37' W a distance of 854.31 feet along j,' �` a h,� said midsection line; Thence N 8T55'37'W a distance of 920.00 feet; Thence 3s4.94f'1 i mI CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE ® S 01 42'37' W a distance of 838.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. to `j / % � 2a8.79' 240-30- ! `' L DEBRA H.ARKELL Dimel,or d Public Service.C1H of B-on,Mardene,de hereby mdaY llad W / I ^ ( i _ •\` ^�- ', auxermNeyi g plot 1m even MIp e>®rined and nm f°ural the were°m°mlame to Uw law. Laf 12 \ ` ru �\ \ \' I opurevee IL end hwday°ecepte the dedication to Iry City of Boe.man for the public,m d aIy Said tract contains 47.62 acres more or less• and is subject to all easements of record , " - n "-' and all lame efewn ae,uw plat m benng dedicated to eucn din at ,Iz9aq• �IDT 4 Y\ ��� or apparent on the ground. ` Y ��- �' _ \"wrv,m LOT 3 ..-'`r /� 59�Ta�.R '\ _ 50,152 wq.A a LOT a \. •,"Iry Dried thb day d 2005 GA 1.15 a- The �' �k----a9.l The above described tract of land is to be known and designated as MINOR SUBDIVISION \`� 1 NaT37'781Y pit D \ \ �"-" :' Z \ H.Arn.t NO. . City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montano; and the lands included in all 397-1X ! $Ff \ I oh our of P°Mle Sarvw streets, avenue, alleys and trails or public squares shown on said plat are hereby vd>� B 3 S79TJ7']e2 ( '`'a.. \ J.: 3I air of Beaman granted and donated to the City of Bozeman for the public use and enjoyment. •d���`�. 2.5' a 2BS19' \ y 239-22 37; , -�'sl1T3T3efE '� s �vs+P'`' h: 330.12' DATED thin day of 2005. 1n p - \ ^y '��� ( CERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA _ �I �- _, tar 3 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW LOT 7 JERRY PERKINS Data �i"� _ aZva4 v°°..R f t �� � D4.323 wafL �"of � 76 -- ''•�., 52876 agJL _ LOT 9 �y` i I The MINOR SUBDNLSION NO, G atin County.Meat n b within the City of Beeman. �`� l :Z 1:48,R,4nw ^pn 1�1 '' 72.921 o-rL Montane.a rwwt-rive nau,ieipoliy.anal.Ithi%the plamin9 of the B°:wron 2020 C.-unity STATE OF �PFtOPOSm WATER •- ;,i- \ a I teas •^� r£ wan a growth Poch odoptod parwrent m S.cUm 76-1-601.t wog_M.CA.ad din IN, pmridad r D �-N t NaT55 l -"�`\- , ✓ ,• B-2, dIn uvl.xbrm wetw&.1-.and mequot,nu ileipal feeftee. Tmeefere,und-the COUNTY OF-)�s `m - - - •�~'` N6T35'J71V`. i �-� 'I on"-of S..U-76-4-125(2)(d)M.CA.NM ouedNMbn b ii dudod fmm w requirement far w �._ McT53'J7'W Mentand Department of EAWomratal Quality revive. _-�- Oat.d tNe aim d 211aS This instrument was acknowledged before me an , 2005, %-- -'� "- - - -- ! by JERRY PERKINS as of PT Land. l . 20031' 2DD.3 t' I - ----.\ a ® a`�* H.Arted \.•..� J i Oe�Omee.,of P.M.Service a Montana general partnership v I \ ,1 r m 3s.ii to wt.eL "' far ti \�\ ,� \� % /• �i� !I aH of Bo:°m°n Notary Public for the State of_. N I ! o.9t a«• o m `3dez'ave .-_.{�--•. `\\ / 11 Residing at CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER fC-'�� i 58T3T]a'E SaT3T3a'E \�e� r �.a L III. y Buchanan.Trmmu°r of Gvilatin County.Montana.do hweby cortlty tad tan arrampmytuq My Commission expires plat hed®b.wl duty•aomin.d and that am real property dim oat wp.dal ewemwhb aam•e and Printed name of notary. i' 1 W ^ 'ie / �- - ( r �•rvlar j I levlevied-on the kind to be ormivi�ate Paid. 2tXLS. i LOT 12 \\ �'I: i.�3a 361 a�:fE-,o ``LOT 1] `0.78 _ 34 t00- �" mwny frahan«, 0.78' Z 1 j �� esl�.``\ 1 i \� �l r 7reewry of G°tbte,WudY ;" 1 Ci58T31'Is- d n --- _-_..LEGEND- cBAPffic scA�.E [7I� � t FI ' 202.H' ,SBT31't3��r _ _ j _4__. 1 _y _�� •� 1�7 �n 7D,45 �I I CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER tom= FOUND PLSS CORNER AS DESCRIBED hw F+yji.- � 1; % j � at" i ! ' FOUND 4' X 4- CONCRETE ROW MONUMENT ( ) 5 7 \ r fI 1 / c� h . t Loeb. f9a R 19l ~ +i ii I r - '? r '/ter / gdn9 in•wmant wa.riled M my office at_v'doek this day of O FOUND 5 B' REHAB W GREEN GIP MARKED 74456L5 \ 'I I t `-�--. _ _+�? - I L 05.ice vmoonANCr Own and Ramraer at iou,Gallatin,P000Coun Montana.do Hewett'°wary teat the / / (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) 2005. a Does.o,a:�.n' Book-of °eeto�ir°n�w„pO°• Daeannrht Na. FND YPC MKD SSdcG UNLESS NOTED I Y i °H`y°ntana- BASIS OF BEARING j ' ! _ ' ^ \ \ j` a: ( - I (d ` I" ' r,.,l r r r -.�.`� ! p Sn.l vono RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT BEARINGS ARE GRID DERIVED FROM ! I .'a a LOT t4 err '�-`-f i I+, "I a R.a«e.r,eauvw,County CPS OBSERVATIONS WITH 148LOT eq.IL �_ ! it 1 "" 7 j\-- , •fi t 1 /335`a«u g 11! Ili r,.7 I e ��ot SURVEY-GRADE RECEIVERS AND 2.5, i i'4\ •� t� _ 1-h'- PLSS PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM REFERENCED TO THE MONTANA �\ �•- ! * ' 01 1tl�f I' +.Htji 111 Itet11!I COORDINATE SYSTEM, SINGLE ZONE, . _ i .�,•-". : � t.` P08 POINT OF BEGINNING NA083. POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT �rwcU@;_'„ i+•y ROW RIGHT OF WAY - -�I�I -_--_ - _ j• /, �• _ _ AREA SUMMARY ,Os. DapND ra�tiN=� i I aa®rif�ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ... ---1 - •P��-_ _ _ _ _ _ ----= - LOTS 47.62 Acre 1389.88' � -� �;BD' -"' .,,.,.e- -� r _ MORRISON ® 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE +sn�,•-PROPOSED SEWER 492.4Z�-••-"' 1 r 14• - "-- "" hip MONUMENT BOX., .� PAX S7jt&Zy, a rJV/ 1 2 S 5 E TOTAL GROSS 47.52 Acre _- 920.00' j"- N234'23-E.30.36'FROM MMERLE,INC.FOUN, WEST PROPOSED WATER SECT10N 1/4 N87'S3t�3 - 56. ••, r,aim i 7 I CENTER 1/4 CORHTR �..,..r�wo_... . . . ROW DEDICATED 2-IN BRASS OAP �,�.�n -, e- a'--- ,--o+. a. u 1 a•.w w•e a+w -'�net way n-yawl aom PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA WITH THIS PUT 6.57 Acre IN MOVUuf!!T BOX - xo+"' t"` PT LAND w- GALLATIN EXISTING SEWER Fy�' hD'•`hr cd; i men q CUENT: COUNTY, MONTANA EXISTING WATER TOTAL NET 41.05 Acre I •� u �� FIELD SRS 7119/2005 720 PLOTTED DATE: gpr/17/2006 I 2-IFOUND tALUMI t s SELRdE 1 p AWN BYK SCALE DM.\94e\aoF\Ama\prevbe\PmPiaLdq 2-INCH wtuuwuu CAP By- CHECKED PROD 3948.002 SHEET 1 OF 1 i xMf.M. \I 8a ct ....e•.y. W-5-04 PROJECT AREA I 0l3, ♦ 5 PED NIE 1 31. Anbn 31. W 4 04 'F LO04 i \o \ �•/ \ \ W-6-04 ._ _ _ — _ �..����✓, c -- � III � �\ � _ \ \ \ � \ \.._\*` -�, ,•°\ I• :1� I rx W-.-04 �cLd LOT 5 L& 6 ` \ ✓ J r I 10'OPEN SPACE �� — \ \ G� —�� I I T'811.1,B�G_SETBACK / 01T1T -OT1T1�`�•' ,*V p� SLOT 3 / ` 1 � \ \ \ \ \'• � ',L' LOT 7 \ -,\ \ /�LLWj-r+ I-LY��.J y1Q ens \ I ' E, a.\ L-QT a LCT 9 I 7 E.w—RA-RIOT.RE°�"2 �. —...� I I LOT 11 J� I• / \ \ I ' BRIDGER PEAKS KENY9N-NbBL VILLAGE I ; — _ I �� \LUMBBR \ \ I %OL12— \ LTT 13 C III 41 _n✓ „✓ �,� OAK STREET LEGEND: fx 33 ^T�33 PROPOSED KENYON-NOBLE WATER LINE m -'• ••- _ „•, - -n ss --- -- EXISTING WATER UNE alx EXISTING SEWER UNE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 1. TYPICAL SECTION (PROPOSED) IS 35' TOP-BACK-OF- EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR CURB TO TOP-BACK-OF-CURB ON PATRICK STREET AND N. C-EN;�C x— EXISTIEXISTING FENCE UNE NG MINOR OUR GROSS 14TH AVE. ADJACENT TO KENYON-NOBLE LUMBER. LOT IIIAEA 'S ACE REOUIRED� TOTAL BUILDING `GREENWAY WETLAND/ OTHER --- -- - -- EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROVIDED I STREAM EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER 2. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF PATRICK STREET, AND N. I I 1 T --------- EXISTING CULVERT 14TH AVE. WILL MATCH THE ROADS ADJACENT TO KENYON I 1.57 PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY NOBLE 2.06 1 I t . —w PROPOSED WATER MAIN •t�,. _ —S PROPOSED SEWER MAIN - I OE 35 _ 0.12 0 10 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 3. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF TSCHACHE LANE IS N ;�'; 1.49nlq - - 1 LOT UCURB NE PROPOSED TO BE 37' TOP-BACK-OF-CURB TO + ' 1 1 r- - - STRFAMiND GUTTER TOP-BACK-OF-CURB. p 0 WETAND AREA PROJECT BOUNDARY 1 0. 0. 0 4 m STORM SEWER 4. ALL AREAS LISTED IN TABLE ARE IN ACRES. Q-� - ,:_ _ 0.04 PHASE UNE C��11 II I-41 STORM INLET 5. RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 6.57 ACRES. a W_#_O# WETLAND IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6. ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING OPEN SPACE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 47.62 ACRES. WEMND MORRISO>` 3 7. REFERENCE CITY OF BOZEMAN RECORD DRAWINGS FOR � PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CREENWAY SETBACK EXISTING UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH. IN GENERAL MAIERLE t(4�;. : c I STREAM/WETLAND EXISTING WATER AT 6.5' EURY. GRAPHIC SCALE ;r�l PTLAND PROPERTY x4 w+xl..r v_s+.,at,rsw.n,ast na.:Iws)sr:-ron rn;IUEI Y:-®s LOCATED IN SE_7JON I.T 23.R SE P.M.M. BJ FEET CLIENT:PT LAND OTHER OPEN SPACE CRYOFBCZ:MAN.G..LLATM COUNTY,MONTANA • ( ) BUILDING SETBACK I inch- 100 fL PLOTTED DATE: Apr/11/2006 ® (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) FIELD WORK:N A DA TC:02/16/06 DRAWING NAM-: PHASE INDICATOR DRAWN BY: MUO SCALE:1 =1DO' M:\3948 \Oc4,A Gd\sre Aon\PRELIMINARY SR[PLAN.Ery CHECKED BY:MRS PRO.) #:3846.004 SHEET I' OF i -\ d� �� �, �� � ��� � � � s ,�� I -^- 1 . I ��. X C � � ^W YL Q Qr1 ti 1 i i I -.r....__�J • y� . r '. � t SOILS AP OF THE PERKIN"I SITE SAYPO BLACKD OG SILT L OANI I SILT LOAM EN BAR LOAM [,-Project Boundary EN BAR LOAM a Q r SAYPO SILT LOAM t BLAC KID OG ."f��^ SILT LOAM P may'° BLACKD OG SILT LOAM t� I t BLOSSBERG LOAM BLOSSBERG �. r " LOAM °, tv, •wLog en"""d�� N{ o too zoo aoo 1:4,718 w—,, �l�l Vl ON r'j dMLOAM Feet �� E�.,E•lN('. O�/+O'�LI LMY ,$ :l••wlM1•1 MAN�'AM:.�r Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area.Mapunit and soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 50B - BLACKDOG SILT LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 15 to 19 inches Mean annual 39 to 43 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Blackdog and similar soils Extent: about 90 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 5 Landform(s): stream terrace Wind erodibility group 6 Slope gradient: 0 to 4 percent Wind erodibility index 48 Parent material. calcareous loess Land capability class, non- 3e Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: well drained Seasonal high water table: greater than 60 inches Hydric soil: no Flooding hazard: none Hydrologic group:B Ponding none Potential frost action: moderate Ecological Silty, 15 to 19 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, south Available Representative soil Texture Permeability Water Capacity pH Kw Kf H1 — 0 to 10 in silt loam moderate 1.8 to 2.0 in 6.6 to 7.3 .32 .32 H2 — 10 to 19 in moderately slow 1.4 to 1.8 in ' 6.6 to 7.8 .32 .32 H3 — 19 to 60 in moderate 6.6 to 8.2 in 7.9 to 8.4 '.37 .37 Minor Components Distribution Generation Date: Page 1 of 1 Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number— Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHT Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index O In Pct Pct Pct 50B: Blackdog 0-10 Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 10-19 Silty clay loam CL A-6 0 0 100 100 95-100 85-95 30-40 10-20 19-60 Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 100 95-100 80-90 25-30 5-10 Physical Soil Properties (J1a) Gallatin County Area, Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors—T"apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry Indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk , hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T bility group - bility index • -density ', conductivity capacity matter Kw Kf T.. bility . bility bility In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro In/In Pct Pct . 506: Blackdog 0-10 --- -- 20-27 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.18-0.20 0.0-2.9 2.0-4.0 .32 .32 5 6 48 10-19 -- - r 27-35 1.20-1.40 1.40-4.00 0.16-0.20 3.0-5.9 1.0-3.0 .32 .32 19-60 --- -- 15-25 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area.Mapunit anc soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 542A - BLOSSBERG LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 12 to 18 inches Mean annual 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free 90 to 110 days Blossberg and similar soils Extent: about 85 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 3 Landform(s): stream terrace Wind erodibility group 6 Slope gradient: 0 to 2 percent Wind erodibility index 48 Parent material: alluvium Land capability class, non- 5w Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: poorly drained Seasonal high water table: approximately 18 inches Hydric soil: yes Flooding none Hydrologic C Ponding none Potentia!frost action: high Ecological Wet meadow, 15 to 19 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, Available Representative soil Texture Permeability Water PH Kw Kf H1 — 0 to 15 in loam moderate 2.5 to 3.0 in 6.6 to 7.8 .32 .37 H2 — 15 to 24 in moderate 1.4 to 1.6 in 6.6 to 7.8 .20 .32 • H3 — 24 to 60 in rapid 0.7 to 1.1 in 6.6 to 7.8 .05 .17 Minor Components . Distribution Generation Date:1/15/2004 Page 1 of 1 Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area, Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number-- Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHTO Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index In Pct Pct Pct Blossberg 0-15*. ' Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0-10 90-100 85-100 70-95 50-75 25-30 ;5-10 15-24 Clay loam,Gravelly loam, CL, A-2, 0 0-15- 70-100 65-100 50-95 30-60 25-35 5-15 Sandy clay loam CL-ML, A-4, `, A-6 SC L _ - , 4 � 24-60 Very cobbly sand,Very GM, A-1 0 30-45 25-75 20-70 10-50 5-20 20-25 NP-5 gravelly loamy coarse sand, GP-GM, Extremely gravelly loamy coarse sand SM, Physical Soil Properties (J1a) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors--T"apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T bility group bility index density conductivity capacity ;"" matter Kw Kf T bility bility ,t bility In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro m/sec In/In Pct Pct 542A: _ Blossberg 0-15 -- --- 20-27' 1.17-1.27 4.00-14.00 0.17-0.20 0.0-2.9, 4.0-6.0- .32 .37 3 6 48 15-24 — — 20-35 1.11-1.31 1.40-14.00 0.15-0.18 3.0-5.9 2.0-4.0 .20 .32 24-60 — -- 0-10 1.50-1.70 42.00- 0.02-0.03_ 0.0-2.9 0.0-0.5• .05 .17 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Page 1 0 .. • Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area.Mapunit and soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 509B - ENBAR LOAM, 0 TO 4 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 15 to 19 inches Mean annual 37 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Enbar and similar soils Extent: about 85 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 4 Landform(s):flood plain Wind erodibility group 6 Slope gradient: 0 to 4 percent Wind erodibility index 48 Parent material. loamy alluvium Land capability class, non- 3w Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: somewhat poorly drained Seasonal high water table: approximately 33 inches Hydric soil: no Flooding hazard: rare Hydrologic group:B Ponding none Potential frost action: high Ecological Subirrigated, 15 to 19 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, Available Representative soil Texture Permeability Water Capacity pH Kw Kf H1 — 0 to 22 in loam moderate 3.5 to 4.4 in 6.6 to 7.8 .28 .28 H2 — 22 to 49 in moderate 3.7 to 4.8 in 7.4 to 8.4 .37 .37 H3 — 49 to 60 in moderately rapid 0.4 to 0.6 in; 7.4 to 8.4 .05 .20 Minor Components Distribution Generation Date: Page 1 of 1 Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number— Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHT Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index O In Pct Pct Pct 5096: Enbar 0-22 Loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 80-100 75-100 60-85 50-75 20-30 5-10 22-49 Loam,Sandy loam CL-ML, A-4 0 0 80-100 75-100 60-85 50-75 20-30 NP-10 • ML 49-60 Very gravelly loamy sand, GM, A-1, 0 0-10 25-60 15-50 10-40 5-30 15-25 NP-5 Very gravelly sandy loam, GP-GM A-2 Extremely gravelly sandy Loam Physical Soil Properties (J1a) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors--T'apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T bility group bility index density conductivity capacity ;. matter Kw Kf T bility bility . bility In Pct Pct Pct 9/cc micro In/In Pct Pct 509B: Enbar 0-22 — — 18-27 y 1.15-1.35 4.00-14.00 0.16-0.20 " ' 0.0-2.9 3.0-5.0 .28 .28 4 6 48 22-49 — — 18-27 1.35-1.55 4.00-14.00 0.14-0.18 0.0-2.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 49-60 — — 5-18 1.50-1.70 14.00-42.00 0.04-0.05 0.0-2.9 0.0 .05 .20 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 Mapunit Descriptions Gallatin County Area, Montana Note,data applies to the entire extent of the mapunit within the survey area.Mapunit and soil properties for a specific parcel of land may vary somewhat and should be determined by on-site investigation. 506A - SAYPO SILT LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES Mean annual 12 to 18 inches Mean annual 39 to 45 degrees F Frost-free period: 90 to 110 days Saypo and similar soils Extent: about 85 percent of the unit Soil loss tolerance (T 2 Landform(s): stream terrace Wind erodibility group 4L Slope gradient. 0 to 2 percent Wind erodibility index 86 Parent material. loamy alluvium Land capability class, non- 6w Restrictive feature(s): none Drainage class: somewhat poorly drained Seasonal high water table: approximately 33 inches Hydric soil: no Flooding hazard: none Hydrologic group:C Ponding none Potential frost action: high Ecological Saline lowland, 10 to 14 inch Ppt zone, northern Rocky Mountain valleys, Available Representative soil Texture 'Permeability Water Capacity pH Kw Kf H1 — 0 to 10 in silt loam moderate 1.1 to 1.4 in 7.9 to 8.4 ' .28 .28 H2 — 10 to 21 in moderate 1.1 to 1.4 in. 7.9 to 8.4 .37 .37 H3 — 21 to 60 in moderately slcw 4.3 to 5.5 in 7`9 to 8.4 .37 .37 Minor Components • Distribution Generation Date: Page 1 of 1 Engineering Properties (H) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated] Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number— Map symbol Liquid Plasticity and soil name Depth USDA texture >10 3-10 limit Unified AASHT Inches Inches 4 10 40 200 index O In Pct Pct Pct 506A: Saypo `0-10,, Silt loam CL-ML A-4 0 0 100 90-100 85-100 70-90 20-25 ' ','5-10 10-21 Clay loam,Silty clay loam, CL, A-4, 0 0 90-100 85-100 75-90 65-80 25-35' S . 5-15 ; Silt loam CL-ML A-6 21-66 Gravelly clay loam,Silty CL, A-4, 0 0 65-95 60-95 55-90 45-80 25-35- = :5-15 clay loam,Silt loam CL-ML, A-6 GC, Physical Soil Properties (J1a) Gallatin County Area,Montana [Entries under"Erosion Factors—T"apply to the entire profile. Entries under"Wind Erodibility Group"and"Wind Erodibility Index"apply only to the surface layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not estimated] Erosion factors Wind Wind Map symbol Moist Saturated Available Linear Organic erodi- erodi- and soil name Depth Sand Silt Clay bulk hydraulic water extensi- Kw Kf T bility group bility index • density conductivity capacity matter Kw Kf T , bility,, bility Fk, 'bility In Pct Pct Pct g/cc micro In/In ,` Pct Pct 506A: j Saypo 0-10 — — 20-27' r 1.10-1.30 4.00-14.00 0.11-0.14 '0.0-2.9 3.0-5.0 .28 .28 2 4L 86 -10-21 — — 20-35 1.20-1.40 4.00-14.00 0.10-0.13 3.0-5.9 1.0-2.0 .37 .37 21-60 - — — 20-35 1.30-1.50 1.40-4.00 0.11-0.14 3.0-5.9 0.5-1.0 .37 .37 Tabular Data Version Date:01/15/2004 a Ck� fE �_ i £ �p "t Ar � e� 4n .' Y+ �z s A • � ' � • s LU X_ ' '� C i N ! �.. 1 �. d F • t Gelatin Uvat ed district MEMO TO: Steve Laufenberg, Environmental Scientist Morrison Maierle, Inc. FROM: Dennis Hengel, Coordinator Gallatin County Weed Distri DATE: September 8, 2006 RE: PT Land Property Owners Enclosed is a copy of the approved Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for the PT Lands Property major commercial subdivision. If you have any questions please contact me at 582-3265. DH/rp Enc. 901 N. Black Bozeman, MT 59715 (406) 582.3265 FAX: 582-3273 SUBDIVISION NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN(PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL) LONG FORM GaMi"CAust (Revised May 2006) V64eed Ntrxt Projected date for Preliminary Plat application: Sept.2006 Date Plan received Alfr. 2 9 2006 Before construction/disturbance begins,please complete and submit a copy of the Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan to the Gallatin County Weed Control Office for review by the Board.This plan may require revision to meet the requirements of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District,and the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act. Upon approval by the Board,this plan must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or appointed Representative in cooperation with the agency responsible for the disturbance and constitutes a binding agreement between the Board and such person or agency. A) GENERAL INFORMATION 1.Name of Cooperator: PT Land Property Owners Association Jerry Perkins (Print Full Name and Name of Company) (Contact Person) 511 North Wallace Avenue, Bozeman,MT 59715 (406)556-3521 (Address-City-State-Zip) (Telephone) 2.Geographic Location to be covered by this Plan:. Legal Description: NE 1/4, NW 1/4,Sec. 1 T. 2S N/S,R. 5E E/W If applicable include the name and address of the Subdivision: Major ® Minor ❑ Number of Lots 18 This property is bounded by Oak Street to the south,North I I1h Avenue to the east,North 15`h Avenue to the West,and Baxter Lane to the North. This property excludes the previously developed Kenyon Noble Site. Refer to Figure 1 "Perkins Property Vicinity and Topographic Map." 3.Land Use(Please check the appropriate box(s) (a)Previous or Historical Land Use Agriculture® Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain: The historical land use has been primarily agricultural production and livestock grazing.` (b)Future Land Use Agriculture❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ® Pasture non-crop ❑ Other ❑ Please explain: This project involves the subdivision of the Perkins property into 18 commercial lots. This project also involves the extension of Tschache Lane from the western property boundary to the intersection with North I I1h Avenue the extension of North 141h Avenue to the intersection with Tschache Lane the extenstion of Patrick Street,the installation of utilities infrastructure primarily located within the road corridors,the development of open space areas in the northern portion of the project area(within Phase 5),the development of three storm water detention ponds within the proposed open space areas,and the construction of a pedestrian trail alone Walton's Stream/Ditch. Refer to the PT Property Preliminary PUD Plan attached to this weed plan 4. Is a Map of the Area or a Copy of the Subdivision Plat Attached? Yes® No❑ 5. Has the Cooperator been informed of the District's Noxious Weed Management Plan and Revegetation Requirements for Disturbed Areas? Yes ® No ❑ 6. Has the Cooperator been informed of the Noxious Weed Management Plan of the District?p g Yes ® No ❑ 1 , 0 • 7, Has the Cooperator been informed of the relevant sections of the Montana County Noxious Weed Control Act? Yes ® No ❑ 8. Has the Cooperator submitted a Noxious weed location map and inventory? Yes ® No ❑ 9. Has the Cooperator attached written estimates of weed control and revegetation costs? Yes ® No ❑ B) NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) Are noxious weeds present on the property? Yes® No ❑ Unknown(due to snow cover) ❑. If yes,list which species and the approximate size of infestation(s). Attach map showing location of noxious weeds on property. If unknown due to snow cover,Cooperator will submit a completed noxious weed inventory and explanation of control methods for approval by the Weed Control District by May 15th of the upcoming field season. Canada thistle(Cirsium arvense): 165,675 square feet* poison hemlock(Corium maculatum): 19,400 square feet* spotted knapweed(Centaurea maculosa): 700 square feet* musk thistle(Carduus nutans): 10,375 square feet* houndstongue(Cynoglossum officinale): 1,000 square feet* common tansy(Tanacetum vu gare): 960 square feet* (Gallatin County noxious weeds are listed in section III of Noxious Weed Management&Revegetation Requirements) *Refer to Figure 2 "Perkins Property Weed Map." 2. Briefly explain the noxious weed control method(s)to be used on noxious weeds already existing on the property or that may arise during construction/development/disturbance of the property. Note: If noxious weeds already exist on the property outline the infestation(s)on a map of the property or on a subdivision plat map. Noxious weeds listed above will be mowed in September 2006 and broadcast sprayed in Fall 2006(weather permitting). During 2007 through 2009,weeds will be broadcast sprayed in the spring when plants are fully emerged and actively growing,but before flowering. Weeds will also be mowed biannually from 2007 through 2009. IS PROPERTY FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION? YES ® NO ❑ IF PROPERTY IS FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION THE FOLLOWING MANDATORY CONDITION OF APPROVAL APPLIES: If property is fallow,in stubble,or in small grain production,once agricultural production ceases,that area of the property not under immediate development will be planted to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District. See Revegetation Section,C.1.,for complete details regarding reseeding and grass reestablishment requirements. Please complete-the appropriate section(s)corresponding to the noxious weed management methods mentioned above. (a) Herbicide Control: *Noxious Weed Canada thistle Chemical Name Milestone Rate 6 oz/acre *Noxious Weed poison hemlock Chemical Name Cimarron Rate l oz/acre *Noxious Weed dotted knapweed Chemical Name Milestone Rate 6 oz/acre *Noxious Weed houndstongue Chemical Name Cimarron Rate 1 oz/acre *Noxious Weed common tansy Chemical Name Cimarron Rate 1 oz/acre *Noxious Weed musk thistle Chemical Name Milestone Rate 6 oz/acre 2 *Timing and method of treatment(s): Weeds will be broadcast sprayed in late September 2006 (precipitation dependent). If dry conditions persist,the contractor will contact the Gallatin County Weed District by Octoberil,2006 to verify unsuitable conditions for herbicide application. Weeds will be broadcast sprayed in the spring of 2007,2008,and 2009. Weeds within close proximity to water will be sprayed only with herbicides approved for riparian areas or weeds will be mowed and/or removed by shovel. Herbicide control fork done by-Self ❑ or Contracted®Name of Contractor: Outdoor Maintenance Service Inc., AlbeAesbitt(OMS), (406) 586-7150 Estimated cost of herbicide control: Year One : $810.00 Year Two: $810.00 Year Three: $810.00 Year Four: $810.00 Total: $3,240.00 *Estimated costs of weed control are provided for four years due to weed control requirements from the Gallatin County Weed District for this project,which include fall 2006 weed control. Estimate provided by: Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group, (MMI) (Attach written estimate.to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (b) Cultural/Mechanical Control: *Methods of weed control: Existing weed infestations will be mowed using a rotary mower. *Timing of control method(s): The site will initially be mowed in the Fall of 2006,prior to herbicide application. Subsequent mowings will occur on or around June 15 and July 20 for the three years that follow(2007,2008,and 2009). Cultural/Mech control work done by-Self❑ or Contracted® Name of Contractor: OMS Estimated cost of cultural/mechanical control: Year One: $600.00 Year Two: $1,200.00 Year Three: $1,200.00 Year Four: $1,200.00 . Total: $4,200.00 Written estimate provided by: MMI (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (c) Biological Control: *Biological control agent(s) N/A *Timing of the release(s)of the Bio-control agent(s): N/A 3 *Weed control method(s)used to control weed spread while insects establish: N/A Biological control work done by-Self 0 or Contracted 0 Name of Contractor N/A Estimated cost of Biological control: Year One: Year Two: Year Three: Total: Written estimate provided by: (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) (d) Total Estimated Costs of Weed Control(Herbicide+Cultural/Mechanical+Biological)for three (3)Years: Year Herbicide I Cultural/Mechanical Biological 1 $810.00 $600.00 N/A 2 $810.00 $1,200.00 N/A 3 $810.00 $1,200.00 N/A 4 $810.00 $1,200.00 N/A Total $3,240.00* $4,200.00* N/A Total: $7,440.00 *See cost breakdown on page 15 of this plan. C) REVEGETATION PLAN FOR DISTURBED AREAS MANDATORY REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS: Areas disturbed during subdivision development (road construction,pond construction,service/utility/gas/electric/telephone line installation)will have a 6" (six inch)layer of topsoil redistributed onto disturbed areas.Disturbed areas will be seeded to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District.In conjunction with the grass seeding,during the first and second. years of grass establishment,and in the third week of June and in the fourth week of July,the areas seeded to grass will be mowed to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. IF PROPERTY IS FALLOW OR IN SMALL GRAIN PRODUCTION THE FOLLOWING MANDATORY CONDITION OF APPROVAL APPLIES: If property is fallow,in stubble or in small grain production,once agricultural production ceases,that area not under immediate development (within 12 months)will be planted to a grass seed mix as approved by the Weed District.Cooperator will revegetate and establish grasses on that portion of the property previously fallow,in stubble,or in small grain production.This includes that portion of the property dedicated to open space,parklands,or common areas.In conjunction with the grass seeding,during the first and second years of grass establishment,and in the third week of June and in the fourth week of July,the area seeded to grass will be mowed to prevent weed seed development and dispersal. A 1. Is property fallow or in small grain production? Yes ® No ❑ If property is fallow or in small grain production outline the area that is fallow or in production on a map of the property or on a subdivision plat map. If yes,area of disturbance(acres):. Approximately 18 acres List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas. Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in the following section. Fall-dormant seeding will occur between October 15 and November 15,2007. During the first and second years(2008 and 2009)of grass establishment, seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July. Approximate seeding/sod date(s) October 15 to November 15,2007 Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15`h for a spring seeding or after October 151h for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ® Name of Contractor: OMS 1)Seed Cost: $825.00(18 acres,20 lbs/acre,$2.29 per lb) List the type and amount of seed/sod to be used for revegetation: Type: `Durar'hard fescue* Rate 7 lbs/acre Type: sheep fescue* Rate 7 lbs/acre Type: smooth brome* Rate 2 lbs/acre Type: tall fescue* Rate 21bs/acre Type: Canada bluegrass* Rate 2 lbs/acre *Throughout the remainder of this weed plan,this seed mix will be referred to as the Subdivision Seed Mix,seeded at a rate of 20 lbs/acre. 2)Seeding Equipment Cost: $1350.00(18 acres,$75.00 per acre,includes labor cost) 3)Labor Cost: Included in eguipment cost 4)Mowing Cost: $11,200.00(2 mowings in 2008 and 2009,4 hours per mowing,$75.00 per hour) 5)Other costs: Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 years: Year Two: $2,175.00 Year Three: $600.00 Year Four: $600.00 Total: $3,375.00 Date revegetation work to be completed by: November 15,2007(This date refers to initial revegetation and excludes the mowing schedule to be implemented in 2008 and 2009.) Written estimate provided by:MMI . 0 - (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 5 2. Will utility/service lines be installed? Yes ® No ❑ a) If yes,length of service lines(ft.or miles): 800 linear feet* *The majority of the proposed utilities will be constructed within the proposed road corridors. This quantification is for the utilities located outside of the proposed road corridors. b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq. ft.) 24,000 square feet c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 445 cubic yards List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas from utility service line installation: Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in the following section. Fall-dormant seeding will occur between October 15 and November 1.5,2007. During the first and second years(2008 and 2009)of grass establishment, seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July. Approximate seeding/sod date(s) October 15 to November 15,2007 Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15`h for a spring seeding or after October 15`h for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ® Name of Contractor: OMS Estimated cost of revegetation for utility/service construction: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): $15.00 per yard (2) Soil Replacement Cost:(includes cost of bringing onsite 6" lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) $6,675.00*(445 yards at$15.00 per yard) *This cost will be excluded from the"Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 Years"because additional topsoil will not be necessary for successful revegetation of disturbed areas. Existing topsoil on site will be separated from subsoil and stockpiled for redistribution prior to seeding (3) Seed Cost: $26.00(0.55 acre,20 lbs per acre,$2.29 per pound) Type: Subdivision Seed Mix Rate: 20 Ibs per acre (4) Seeding Equipment Cost: $42.00(0.55 acre,$75.00 per acre:includes labor cost) (5) Labor Cost: Included in equipment cost (6) Mowing Cost: $300.00 two mowings in 2008 and 2009, 1 hour per mowing,$75.00 per hour) (7) Other costs: Total estimated costs of revegetation for 3 years: Year Two: ' 170.00 Year Three: $150.00 Year Four: $150.00 Total: $370.00 Date revegetation work to be completed by: November 15,2007(This date refers to initial revegetation and excludes the mowing schedule to be implemented in 2008 and 2009.) Written estimate provided by: MMI (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 6 3. Will a pond be constructed? Yes ® No ❑ *Three storm water detention ponds will be constructed in the northern portion of the property area. a) If yes,area of disturbance(sq. ft.): 30,492 square feet b) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 830 cubic yards: Revegetation will occur within a 30-foot-wide perimeter 1.500 linear feet) around open water features. List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas from pond construction: Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in the following section. Fall-dormant seedier will occur between October 15 and November 15,2007. During the first and second years(2008 and 2009)of grass establishment, seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July- Approximate seeding/sod date(s) October 15 to November 15,2007 Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15`s for a spring seeding or after October 15`n for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ® Name of Contractor: OMS Estimated cost of revegetation for pond: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): $15.00 per yard (2) Soil Replacement Cost: (includes cost of bringing onsite 6"lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) $12,450(830 yards at$15.00 per yard) *This cost will be excluded from the"Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 Years"because additional topsoil will not be necessary for successful revegetation of disturbed areas. Existing topsoil on site will be separated from subsoil and stockpiled for redistribution prior to seeding (3) Seed Cost: $30.00(0.6 acre,20 lbs per acre. $2.29per lb) Type: Subdivision Seed Mix Rate: 201bs per acre (4) Seeding Equipment Cost: $45.00(0.6 acre,$75.00per acre,includes labor cost) (5) Labor Cost: Included in equipment cost (6) Mowing Cost: $300.00(two mowings in 2008 and 2009, 1 hour per mowing,$75.00per hour) (7) Other costs: Total estimated costs of revegetation for 3 years: Year Two: $75.00 Year Three: $150.00 Year Four: $150.00 Total: $375.00 Date revegetation work to be completed by: November 15,2007(This date refers to initial revegetation and excludes the mowing schedule to be implemented in 2008 and 2009.) Written estimate provided by: MMI (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 7. 4, Will a road system be constructed? Yes ® No ❑ • a) If yes,length of road(ft.or miles): 2,300 linear feet b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq. ft): 69,000 square feet c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 1,278 cubic yards List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas from road construction: Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in the following section. Fall-dormant seeding will occur between October 15 and November 15,2007. During the first and second years(2008 and 2009)of grass establishment, seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July. Approximate seeding/sod date(s) October 15 to November 15,2007 Note:If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15`h for a spring seeding or after October 15"'for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑ or Contracted Z. Name of Contractor: OMS Estimated cost of revegetation for road system: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): $15.00 per yard (2) Soil Replacement Cost:(includes cost of bringing onsite 6"lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing • soil onto disturbed area) $19.170.00*(1,278 yards at$15.00 per yard) *This cost will be excluded from the"Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 Years"because additional topsoil will not be necessary for successful revegetation of disturbed areas. Existing topsoil onsite will be separated from subsoil and stockpiled for redistribution prior to seeding (3) Seed Cost: $75.00 0.6 acres,20 lbs per acre,$2.29 per lb) Type: Subdivision Seed Mix Rate 20 lbs/acre (4) Seeding Equipment Cost: $120.00(1.6 acre, $75.00 per acre:includes labor cost) (5) Labor Cost: Included in equipment cost (6) Mowing Cost: $450.00(two mowings in 2008 and 2009, 1.5 hours per mowing„$75.00 per hour) (7) Other costs: Total estimated costs of revegetation for 3 years: Year Two: $195.00 Year Three: $225.00 Year Four' $225.00 Total: $645.00 Date revegetation work to be completed by: November 15,2017(This date refers to initial revegetation and excludes the mowing schedule to be implemented in 2008 and 2009.) Written estimate provided by: NM (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 8 • . • S. Will a park be constructed? Yes ® No ❑ *Open space areas will be developed in the northern portion of the property(within Phase 5). a) If yes,area of park(acres): 9.15 acres • b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq. ft): 398,574 square feet c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 7 381 cubic yards List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas from park construction: Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in the followine section. Fall-dormant seeding,will occur between October 15 and November 15,2007. During the first and second Years(2008 and 2009)of Brass establishment,seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July. Approximate seeding/sod date(s) October 15 through November 15 2007 Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15`h for a spring seeding or after October 15`h for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ® Name of Contractor: OMS Estimated cost of revegetation for park: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): $15.00 per yard (2) Soil Replacement Cost: (includes cost of bringing onsite 6" lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) $110,715.00*(7,381 yards at$15.00 per yard) *This cost will be excluded from the"Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 Years"because additional topsoil will not be necessary for successful revegetation of disturbed areas. Existing topsoil onsite will be separated from subsoil and stockpiled for redistribution prior to seeding (3) Seed Cost: $420.00(9.15 acres, 20 lbs per acre,$2.29 per lb) Type: Subdivision Seed Mix Rate 20 lbs/acre (4) . Seeding Equipment Cost: $690.00(9.15 acres:$75.00 per acre:includes labor cost ) (5) Labor Cost: Included in equipment cost (6) Mowing Cost: $1,200(two mowings in 2008 and 2009,4 hours per mowing,$75.00 per hour] (7) Other costs: Total estimated costs of revegetation for 3 years: Year Two: $1.110.00 Year Three: $600.00. Year Four $600.00 Total: $2,310.00 Date revegetation work to be completed by: November 15, 2007 as date refers to initial revegetation and excludes the mowing,schedule to be implemented in 2008 and 2009.) Written estimate provided by: MMI (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 9 6. Will a trail system be constructed? Yes* ® No❑ • *Revegetation of disturbances caused by trail construction will be in accordance with City of Bozeman approved landscape plan,as designed by Cashman Nursery. a) If yes,length of trail(ft. or miles): 2,890 linear feet b) If yes,area of disturbance(sq.ft): 28,900 square feet c) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil 535 cubic yards List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas from trail construction: Disturbed areas will be broadcast-seeded with the seed mix described in the following section. Fal1-dormant seeding will occur between October 15 and November 15,2007. During the first and second years(2008 and 2009)of grass establishment, seeded areas will be mowed during the third week in June and the fourth week in July. Approximate seeding/sod date(s) October 15 to November 15, 2007 Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15te for a spring seeding or after October 15th for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ® Name of Contractor: Cashman Nursery • Estimated cost of revegetation for trails: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards):$15.00 per yard (2) Soil Replacement Cost: (includes cost of bringing onsite 6"lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) $8,030.00*(535 yards at$15.00 per yard) *This cost will be excluded from the"Total Estimated Costs of Revegetation for 3 Years"because additional topsoil will not be necessary for successful revegetation of disturbed areas. Existing topsoil onsite will be separated from subsoil and stockpiled for redistribution prior to seeding (3) Seed Cost: N/A* *Cashman Nursury will be responsible for revegetation practices in disturbed areas associated with the construction of the pedestrian trail. Therefore seed costs associated with the trail construction have not been included in this weed plan. (4) Seeding Equipment Cost: N/A (5) Labor Cost: N/A (6) Mowing Cost: N/A ( ) Other costs:. N/A Total estimated costs of revegetation for 3 years: Total: N/A . Date revegetation work to be completed by: N/A Written estimate provided by:N/A (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 10 7. Will a central septic system be constructed? Yes ❑ No* *The proposed water and sewer design will tie into the City of Bozeman water and sewer system; • therefore,no central septic system will be constructed. a) If yes,area of disturbance(sq.ft.):N/A b) If yes,list amount(yards)of topsoil required to cover disturbed area with 6"lift of soil N/A List the method(s)(seeding,sod installation,tree/shrub planting,etc)to be used to accomplish revegetation of the disturbed areas from central septic system construction: N/A Approximate seeding/sod date(s) N/A Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 15'h for a spring seeding or after October 15'h for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor: N/A Estimated cost of revegetation for central septic system: (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): N/A (2) Soil Replacement Cost:(includes cost of bringing onsite 6" lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) N/A (3) Seed Cost: N/A (4) Seeding Equipment Cost: N/A (5) Labor Cost: N/A (6) Mowing Cost: N/A (7) Other costs: N/A Date revegetation work to be completed by: N/A Written estimate provided by: N/A (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 11 8. Other disturbances Yes ❑ No* *No other disturbances are anticipated. Timing of revegetation practices: N/A Approximate seeding/sod date(s) N/A Note: If dependent upon natural precipitation for grass establishment then plant prior to May 151h for a spring seeding or after October 15`h for a fall dormant seeding. Revegetation work done by Self ❑ or Contracted ❑ Name of Contractor: N/A Estimated cost of revegetation(other disturbances): (1)Topsoil Cost(yards): N/A (2) Soil Replacement Cost:(includes cost of bringing onsite 6"lift/layer of topsoil and cost of distributing soil onto disturbed area) N/A (3) Seed Cost: N/A (4) Seeding Equipment Cost: N/A (5) Labor Cost: N/A (6) Mowing Cost: N/A • (7) Other costs: N/A Total estimated costs of revegetation for 3 years: N/A Date revegetation work to be completed by: N/A Written estimate provided by: N/A (Attach written estimate to Weed Management and Revegetation Plan) 12 Total estimated cost of implementing Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for a period of four(4)years(includes Herbicide+Cultural/Mechanical+Biological+Revegetation costs): Year Herbicide Cultural/Mechanical Biological Revegetation 1 $810.00 $600.00 N/A N/A 2 $810.00 $1,200.00 N/A $3,625.00 3 $810.00 $1,200.00 N/A $1,725.00 4 $810.00 $1,200.00 N/A $1,725.00 Total $3,240.00 $4,200.00 N/A $7,075.00 Grand Total: $14,515.00 List source of gravel/pit run/road mix/topsoiVetc.brought on-site for disturbance mitigation and/or construction. Name of Gravel Pit: TMC.Inc. Location: Belgrade,MT Contact Person: Randy Cline-(406) 388-6844 Does source of material have an approved Weed Management and Revegetation Plan on file with the Weed District? Yes ® No❑ • 13 • • D) APPROVAL OF NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT AND REVEGETATION PLAN APPROVED APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED ❑ AND/OR CONDITIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR CONDITIONS: The submitted Weed Management and Revegetation Plan is valid for three(3)years from date of approval by the Gallatin County Weed District. If prior to Final Plat approval a new Cooperator or Landowner becomes involved in the subdivision development process the new Cooperator or Landowner must resubmit a Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for approval by the Gallatin County Weed District. Prior to expiration the Cooperator and Landowner must submit a new Weed Management and Revegetation Plan for approval by the Gallatin County Weed District. The Cooperator will submit a year-end status report of the noxious weed control and revegetation that • was completed within the subdivision to the Gallatin County Weed District by December 15th of each year. Upon Approved or Approved With Recommendations/Conditions the Cooperat a to comply with the above submitted Noxious Weed nageme Revegetatio la 4QS4ge�i �_ (Signature of Weed Board Chairma ) (S' ature oV Cooperator) vlhk AmJI) JM14 ;Ze4AS (Type/print name of Ch^airrman//R(Iresenta ' e) (Type/print name of Coo erator) ��' J � oW'0{p lJ �o2S✓'� �o (Date) (Date (Si tune of L caner) r;41s (Type/print fiame of Landowner) 8-a5=o6 (Date) With submittal of the Memoranda of Understanding for final plat approval the Coop ator ill ide: • 1. Documentation that the above Weed Management&Revegetation Plan has een i ented. 2. Copy of subdivision covenants that apply to noxious weed management. Coop for Initials 14 Weed Management Plan—PT Land(MMI#3948.004) Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group August 2006 COST ESTIMATE OF HERBICIDE CONTROL: • Milestone($96.00 per quart x I quart) $96.00 per year Cimarron ($34.00 per ounce x 1 ounce) $34.00 per year Herbicide Application($85.00 x 8 hours) $680.00 per year Total for Year 1 (weather permitting)* $810.00 Total for Year 2 $810.00 Total for Year 3 $810.00 Total for Year 4 $810.00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE OF HERBICIDE CONTROL(3 YEARS)...................................$3,240.00 *If dry conditions persist,herbicide application will not be implemented during year I (Fall 2006). The weed contractor will contact the Gallatin Valley Weed District by October 1,2006 to verify unsuitable conditions for herbicide application. Note: Cost estimates assume weed control will be necessary for.years 2, 3,and 4 because weed eradication may not be a realistic expectation in the first year. COST ESTIMATE OF MECHANICAL CONTROL: • Mowing: $75.00/hour,8 hours per mowing,two mowing per year(one mowing in 2006) Total for Year 1 $600.00 Total for Year 2 $1,200.00 Total for Year 3 $1,200.00 Total for Year 4 $1,200.00 TOTAL COST ESTIMATE OF MECHANICAL CONTROL(3 YEARS).............................. $4,200.00 Note: Cost estimates assume weed control will be necessary for years 2,3,and 4 because weed eradication may not be a realistic expectation in the first year. 15 f -� PERKINS PROPERTY .r-1 OZEMAN , GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA T2S, R5E, SECTION 1 I r �Jf'+, . , - Tic ;le. I — 47?8T 979 j� Aairc i ICeoll. • • - 1 INVESTI TION .j • \` ■ o MA s _ — IF _ T __ UI OAK STJEET r— •• •. • .__ _ _ I '1 7 5ST • 4_. —.. Tf-a,Ile r �768AT i. . i 4 i •• a ,..• I ,X .. �� ■ 41 9rogn rn Is • - , J.1 - • • � 1 ) I � 'I''. -e/d�� .,r, '•art` C i'1 tfM k h lq �iia♦' ♦�ry .S,.a is"i•v+r...t^� 'e:�} ':•.� ��. yet ,.+ � ,� �,��� a�;. • f �� vJa,•� t,� �.1 �s Kcr.` M1 . I� ?t �c 1. ,! �( OF BOZ �, � �,�,;��! < �, ..I' ;yfg '}y�,� Y f •. "� c:.� �, 1 ft, 4 , 4r. ;;t !v`,l� _' � „ ,'S`F �>d�F � �rti hf � � ♦ eW t:'. �� .l.y �ti+ ♦c �.i '?yySl,,� ♦„' -, - tip} �ti y rr�- '1. ♦l f ••♦�,� -Yt" ' :♦..1 i\iY _. �.!6. 'rr'.:�' w�'.- .y 1• i�`1 iaV:n °ti� - .a".. .. �1 USGS QUADRANGLE TOPO MAP-BOZEMAN QUAD FIGURE 1 WITH CITY PARCELS LAYER OVERLAID ARRISON PERKINS PROPERTY E IERLE,INC. SUWEM VICINITY& GRAPHIC SCAL Y•r� a In81.pw �Pnv 12,00 600 ,zoo vo ea,,, uo, te,T.i.mm ad a "'•n,•ft.cwq s•-an, F.c.�1'"'-„� TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CLIENT: ( IN FEET ) FIELD WORK DATE:8-28-06 PLOTTED DATE: Sep/12/2006 - 10:46:22 am DRAWING NAME: 1.. DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:1••=1200' 1 inch = 12C10 ft. M:\3948\004\Weed Mop\Approved\Perkins Vic Map.dwg 1*1 BUT BT PROJ #:3948.004 SHEET 1 OF 1 CT PH,MT,CT CT f PROJECT AREA CT _� '� � y-•`., - a y HT 41 ,. MT r PH CT •� �� MT CT,PH,TAN 7, f SK MT, .�, CT,PH =' CT CT , 1 CT ° _;•r p. , CT,MT SK (ONE PLANT) LEGEND OAK STREET - 0 � 300 CT-CANADA THISTLE HT- HOUNDSTONGUE x T �.� -}� ( IN FEET ) MT- MUSK THISTLE PH - POISON HEMLOCK TT MOSON 901 Technology Blvd. DRAWN BY: JCH PROJECT NO. ��� PERKINS PROPERTY SK- SPOTTED KNAPWEED TAN -COMMON TANSY y�F Slewyoe Bozeman MT 59718 CMK D.BY: TCT 3948.004.035 �.1.] MAIERLE INC. Phone:(406)s874721 APPR.BY: BOZEMAN MONTANA FIGURE NUMBER Fax:(408)587-1178 DATE: 7/14/08 WEED MAP FIG. Z ��� COPYgWHfaMCR1E50NMIME,—,2N� M:\3948\004\Weed MepWpproved\Perldns Weed Map.dwg Plotted by mskorpik on Sep/12/2008 OWNER PIT LAND a 511 NORTH WALLACE AVENUE BOZEMAN. MT 59715-3757 ENGINEER m �� MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. Z 90 3011 PALMER STREET PROJECT e-v �x A W-5-04 MISSOULA. MT 59808 AREA b11i6 SITE PLAN APPLICANT OF LOT 1,BLOCK 1 AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK 606 NORTH 7TH AVE. A �) BOZEMAN. IMT 59715 m a 406-586-0251 + a I � a rpr a i VICINITY Il / W-4-04 r'9TE'9 I' I / B 2' W 2104 J 555,60,) sq.fIL \ W- \ \12.75 Cares 6 gyp•-- , .O -04 �� I - DETENTION POND PHASE 5/ DETENTION POND \ I E\W — l - - - - W-7-04 BRIDGER PEAKS I I ( \ I �I F TOWN CENTER DETENTION l 2 I .40,962 sq.tt./ \ 4 \ \ W-1 J I 32-0 ; � � 0.94 acres 6�;61 acres es \ \ 5 85o sq.ft ` 6 �� \ C t' \• 1.19 acres - 71,15�eq.tt. ...._ A \ ps P ASE\ 4 I 10'OPEN�SP,SETBACK \ �� w 7'BU \ 42,887 sq.iN\ 4\ \ / \ ^ $-') -0.98`cres '4 759 sq.tt. 3 \ \ 2 G \ �l �.03 acres 1 /\ 1557 7asq. ~ 71.321 sq.tt ` p \ 1`9 acres 1.64 acres 1` : \ \Py-IA`SE 2 r „ i I $-2 r _ I 37 149 sq. 36.982 sq.fL I �0.8�5 acres \ 0.85 acres I B - \ / KENYQN-NOBLE, LLA — I APPROXI"TE _ 1 LUMBER �E \ —2 �I i 0\ION OF PRY a 5 o • Z PHI \1 � i \ ,� � -•� =9 WA E�R SERVICE e �r,��• s e " " I 3.3'1 �c fir•• / / OAK STREET ��w �„ J , LEGEND: PROPOSED E[u u exu Exu ocu Exu 1 Exw UNE DOSTDIG WATER��8UE WA� GENERAL NOTES: -- '- -- -- -- u E+u EXISTING SEWER LINE EXIT SEWER'ANHOLE 1. TYPICAL SECTION (PROPOSED) IS 35' TOP-BACK-OF- CURB TO LOT BLOCK# GROSS USABLE OPEN SPACE EXISTING MANOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR TOP-BACK-OF-CURB ON PATRICK STREET AND N. 14TH AVE. AREA SPACE REQUIRED TOTAL BUILDING GREENWAY WETLAND/ OTH -x—x—x- EXISTING FENCE LINE ADJACENT TO KENYON-NOBLE LUMBER. PROVIDED STREAM - — — — - EXISTING RXrart-oE-vuY _ -_ ____ EMIM OVERHEAD POWER 2.THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF PATRICK STREET. AND N. 14TH AVE. DOSTINGPROPOSED CULVERT WILL MATCH THE ROADS ADJACENT TO KENYON NOBLE. REFERENCE -_ —w PR WATER WINDY APPLICATION PACKAGE FOR CROSS-SECTION DETAILS. —s PRavoseD SEWER MATH - - O PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 3. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF TSCHACHE LANE IS PROPOSED TO N - - CURB AND COTTER BE 37' TOP-BACK-OF-CURB TO TOP-BACK-OF-CURB. 0.08 - - STREAM - - WETLAND AREA 4. ALL AREAS LISTED IN TABLE ARE IN ACRES. 4 3 1.41 1 72 0 0.19 OnR - - all PROJECT BOUNDARY STM _ - e�xr_ e�xr• P t� 5. RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 6.83 ACRES. — — — — DRNNAIE SWALE ST M INLET 6. ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING OPEN SPACE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY WEIAND IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 47.62 ACRES. WETLAND 7. REFERENCE CITY OF BOZEMAN RECORD DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING AMORRISON SWAY SETBACK UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH. EXISTING WATER AT APPROXIMATELY 6.5' ��� •1OO° PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN STREAM/WenANID BURY. GRAPHIC SCATS 1Y1tiI RLE�I NC. '»' PT LAND PROPERTY OTHER OPEN SPACE 8. REFERENCE PREUMINARY PLAT AND SUBMITTAL BINDER FOR au rs arNr n>m or Txaw� �lao>es LOCATED IN SECTION 1,T 2S,R 5E.PM.M., — SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. (IN MT) CLIENT:PT LAND CRY OF BOZEMAN,GALLATIN COUNTY,MONFANA BUILDING 0 SETBACK 1 mo 9. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 30R FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT AND IS 70 b- Too PLOTTED DATE: Au g/24/2006 100Cf[Oli) FIELD WORK•N A DATE:07/26/06 NOT TO BE PROPORTIONALLY DISTRIBUTED FOR EACH LOT. DRAWN BY: MJO SCAE:I'=T00' DRAWING NAME: L N:W9/8\004\AcoA\dU Dkn\PREUNINARI'PUD PUN.Oxq CHECKED BY:MRS PROJ it,3948.004 SHEET 1 OF I i ' . r^"-- s D m i a X j 1'I • x a c a� a a Q • u • MOMSON TecInical �Jt�i9lfui.re-�ISJieariaiiTuiJL• M O To: Allan Steinle, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers From: Paul McGuire,Senior Environmental Scientist Steve Laufenberg,Environmental Scientist Date: December 16,2004 Re: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property-Wetland Delineation Report Cc: Jerry Perkins,Owner Dave Hutchinson Tom Henesh,NM Keith Belden,NM(2 copies) INTRODUCTION At the request of Jerry Perkins, the Perkins/Kenyon Noble property was examined on July 26., 2004, • by Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group (MMI), for the presence and extent of wetlands and waterways. The 65.32-acre site is located in the northwest quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The site consists predominantly of flat agricultural land,which slopes gradually downgradient to the north. Two creeks, Spring Creek and an unnamed tributary to Spring Creek, are located in the northwestern and northeastern portions of the property, respectively. Portions of the Spring Creek fringe wetland were vegetated with willows and other wetland shrubs. Predominant vegetation on the site included a barley crop and other herbaceous plants. Three depressional wetlands, two riverine/depressional wetlands, one riverine wetland, and one slope wetland were identified and delineated on the property. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to locate areas that meet the criteria for wetlands and non-wetlanc waterways and delineate their boundaries. A second objective was to provide preliminary observations as to the jurisdictional status of the delineated wetlands based on their hydrologic connection to a waters of the U.S. METHODS The wetland delineation completed by M1\41 was based on the methodology developed by the U.S. . Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and other federal agencies, for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The investigation consisted of an off-site review of existing site-spe-.ific information and completion of an on-site inspection using the Routine Level 2 Determination Method outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property-Wetland Delineation Report Page 2 Morison-Maierle Inc. Environmental Services Group December 2004 Off-Site Review A preliminary off-site review was conducted to identify potential wetland areas and waterways from a variety of source documents. The source documents used for this review included: the 1987 Bozeman, Montana U.S. Geological Survey(USGS) 7.5' Topographic Map (Figure 1), the U.S. Department of Agriculture 2002 Soil Survey of Gallatin County, Montana (Figure 2), a 2000 Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) orthographic aerial photograph of the subject property(Figure 3), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map (Figure 4). On-Site Review Wetlands were identified and delineated using the standard methodology described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual to assist in meeting the requirements of Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act. Wetlands were identified as areas that met the standard criteria for hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Areas that were determined to be wetlands (W) were marked with -- pin flags, documented, surveyed, and mapped. The locations of wetlands and sample points are — - - -- provided on Exhibit A, Wetland Delineation Map. Soils,vegetation, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland- • upland boundaries. Data were recorded on USACE data forms for sample points on both the upland and wetland sides of the wetland boundary along a linear transect. Completed forms are included in Appendix A. Photos were taken of the individual data points, and these photos, along with their descriptions, are provided in Appendix B. Soils were characterized to a depth of approximately 16 inches utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. At times, rocky soil conditions limited the depth of excavation. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent areal or basal coverage within a 20- foot radius of sample points for the tree and shrub layers and a 10-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Indicator status of plant species was taken from the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9-Northwest and the 1993 Supplement to List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Hydrology was determined based on factors such as depth to free water in soil test pits, soil saturation, oxidized root channels, and topographic position, among others. RESULTS The delineation effort consisted of a preliminary off-site investigation of available information and an on-site investigation that included a pedestrian survey of the Perkins/Kenyon Noble property. • The investigation resulted in the delineation of seven wetlands. The total acreage for the seven wetlands was approximately 6.36 acres. 0 • Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property-Wetland Delineation Report Page 3 Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group December 2004 Off-Site Review A review of the 1987 USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area shows relatively flat terrain that slopes gently downgradient to the north. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, an approximate 20-foot change in elevation occurs over the entire project area. The map also depicts a small portion of a perennial stream, Spring Creek, located in the northwest portion of the property. An unnamed tributary to Spring Creek runs through the northeastern corner of the property. These areas were the most likely to harbor wetlands. The portion of Spring Creek and its associated fringe wetland were delineated as W-5-04 and W-6-04. The unnamed tributary and its associated fringe wetland were delineated as W-2-04. According to the Soil Survey of Gallatin County, Montana, soils in the vicinity of the subject property have been mapped as Blackdog silt loam (50B), Saypo silt loam (506A), Enbar loam (509B), and Blossberg loam (542A). The Saypo silt loam, Enbar loam, and Blossberg loam all contain hydric components. The primary map unit, Saypo silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, contains a Newtman hydric component; the primary map unit, Enbar loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, contains a Nythar hydric component; the primary map unit, Blossberg loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, includes Blossberg and Bonebasin hydric components. Wetlands were delineated within all four soil map unit locations. A review of the aerial photograph depicts predominantly homogenous vegetated land with a darker linear area in the northeast corner of the property, suggestive of a stream channel. Two areas that show linear, dense vegetation in the northwest corner also appear to be channels, and therefore, had the possibility of harboring wetlands. The field investigation revealed that those areas appearing on the topographic map as dense vegetation in the northwest corner of the property were in fact portions of a perennial stream, Spring Creek. The darker, linear area suggestive of a channel in the northeastern portion of the property was determined through field investigation to be an unnamed tributary to Spring Creek. Wetlands W-5-04 and W-6-04 were associated with Spring Creek, and wetland W-2-04 was associated with the unnamed tributary to Spring Creek. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map (Figure 4) identified three types of wetlands located within the project area. The three types of wetlands include palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded wetland (PEMC),which corresponded to Spring Creek and W-6-04; palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded, excavated wetland (PEMCx), which corresponded to W-4- 04; and palustrine, emergent, temporarily flooded wetland (PEMA), which corresponded to the tributary to Spring Creek and W-2-04. On-Site Review A map of the delineated wetland boundaries located on the subject property has been provided as Exhibit A. Corresponding data forms are provided in Appendix A. The following descriptions of the wetlands and their surrounding uplands reflect conditions observed at the time of the delineation. Three depressional wetlands, two riverine/depressional wetlands, one riverine wetland, and one slope wetland were delineated on the property. Wetland W-1-04 is a depressional wetland located south of a dirt road and east of North I It' Avenue. The hydrology indicators for W-1-04 include drainage patterns in the wetland, saturation in the upper 12 inches, and a positive FAC-neutral test. Dominant wetland vegetation includes beaked sedge (Carex rostrata, OBL), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia cespitosa, FACW),reed canary t • • Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property-Wetland Delineation Report Page 4 Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group December 2004 grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACW), field mint (Mentha arvensis,FACW-), broad-leaf cattail (Typha latifolia, OBL), and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense, FACU+). The hydric soil is a low chroma color of 1 OYR 2/1. The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation _ from_beaked sedge, tufted hairgrass, field mint, and broad-leaf cattail in the wetland to common dandelion(Taraxacum officinale, FACU), Canada thistle, houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale, FACU), common lambsquarter(Chenopodium album, NI), and scotch thistle(Onopordum acanthium,NI) in the upland. Wetland W-1-04 is separated from W-2-04 by approximately 30 feet; this area consists of a slight.downgradient slope from W-1-04 to W-2-04. Therefore, W-1-04 was observed to be jurisdictional because of its close proximity to W-2-04 and its ultimate connection to a waters of the U.S. Wetland W-2-04 is a riverine/depressional wetland. The hydrology indicators include inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, drainage pattern in wetlands, and a positive FAC-neutral test. The dominant wetland vegetation includes reed canary grass, field mint, beaked sedge, Canada thistle, fowl manna grass (Glyceria striata, OBL), soft rush (Juncus effusus, FACW), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica, FAC+), and yellow hawkweed (Hieracium pretense,NI). The hydric soil is a low chroma color of 10YR 3/1.from 0-8 inches, and 10YR 3/2 from.8-16 inches. The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation from reed canary grass, field mint,beaked sedge, and fowl manna grass in the wetland to Canada thistle, scotch thistle, common lambsquarter,poison hemlock(Conium maculatum, FACW-), spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa, NI), and musk thistle (Carduus nutans,NI) in the uplands. Wetland W-2-04 was observed to be jurisdictional in . that its associated stream is a tributary to Spring Creek, which ultimately connects to the East Gallatin River. Wetland W-3-04 is a depressional wetland. The hydrology indicators include saturation in the upper 12 inches, drainage pattern in wetland, and a positive FAC-neutral test. The dominant wetland vegetation includes reed canary grass, tufted hairgrass, broad-leaf cattail, Canada thistle, and sandbar willow (Salix exigua, OBL). The hydric soil is a low chroma color of 10YR 4/1. The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation from broad-leaf cattail, sandbar willow, reed canary grass, and tufted hairgrass in the wetland to musk thistle, spotted knapweed, western salsify(Tragopogon dubius,M), and awnless brome(Bromus inermis,NI) in the upland. Wetland W-3-04 is separated from W-2-04 by approximately 40 feet; which is characterized by a slight downgradient slope. Therefore, W-3-04 was observed to be jurisdictional because of its close proximity to W-2-04.and its ultimate connection to a waters of the U.S. Wetland W-4-04 is a slope wetland. The hydrology indicators include saturation in the upper 12 inches and drainage patterns in the wetland. The dominant wetland vegetation includes broad-leaf cattail,reed canary grass, Canada thistle, and catchweed bedstraw (Galium aparine;FACU). The hydric soil is a low chroma color of 1 OYR 2/1 with mottles (I OYR 4/2). The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation from reed canary grass and broad-leaf cattail in the wetland to common dandelion and quackgrass (Agropyron repens, FAC-) in the upland. Wetland W-4-04 was observed to be jurisdictional in that it connects via a culvert with W-5-04, which is associated with Spring Creek. Spring Creek ultimately connects with the East Gallatin River. Wetland W-5-04 is a riverine/depressional wetland. The hydrology indicators include saturation in the upper 12 inches and drainage patterns in the wetland. The dominant wetland vegetation includes reed canary grass, beaked sedge, tufted hairgrass, Canada thistle, field mint,broad-leaf • Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property-Wetland Delineation Report Page 5 Morrison-Maierle,Inc.,Environmental Services Group December 2004 cattail, hairy willow-herb (Epilobium ciliaticm, FACW-), large-leaf avens (Geum macrophyllum, FACW-), red-osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera,FACW), and willow species (Salix spp., NI, OBL to FAC). The hydric soil from 0-8 inches is a low chroma color of 10YR 2/1. From 8-18 inches, the soil is a GLEY1 4/5GY with mottles (7.5YR 3/3). The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in the vegetation from reed canary grass, hairy willow-herb, large-leaf avens, beaked sedge, tufted hairgrass, and broad-leaf cattail in the wetland to snowberry(Symphoricarpus albus, FACU), quackgrass, houndstongue, and Wood's rose (Rosa woodsii, FACU) in the upland. This wetland was observed to be jurisdictional due to its hydrologic connection to Spring Creek, which ultimately connects with the East Gallatin River. Wetland W-6-04 is a riverine wetland. The wetland includes a portion of Spring Creek and its associated fringe wetland; the wetland extends west of the subject property boundary. The hydrology indicators include inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, and drainage patterns in the wetland. The dominant wetland vegetation includes fowl manna grass, beaked sedge, tufted hairgrass, meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis, FACW), white clover(Trifolium repens, FAC), alsike clover(Trifolium hybridum, FAC), small-fruit bulrush (Scirpus microcarpus, OBL), and prickly currant (Ribes lacustre,FAC+). The hydric soil is a low chroma color, 10YR 2/1, with mottles, 1 OYR 4/1. The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in the vegetation from small-fruit bulrush, beaked sedge, fowl manna grass,meadow foxtail, and tufted hairgrass in the wetland to Canada thistle, common dandelion, snowberry, fowl bluegrass (Poa palustris, FAC), and slender wheatgrass (Agropyron trachycaulum, FAC) in the upland. Wetland W-6-04 was observed to be jurisdictional in that it is associated with Spring Creek, which ultimately connects with the East Gallatin River. Wetland W-7-04 is a depressional wetland separated from wetland W-2-04 by a large thistle community. Conditions for W-7-04 were similar to those of wetland W-2-04 and therefore no data sheet was completed. The hydrology indicator was saturation in the upper 12 inches. The dominant wetland vegetation included beaked sedge, hairy willow-herb, and poison hemlock. No soil data were collected. The wetland-upland boundary primarily follows a change in vegetation from beaked sedge and hairy willow-herb in the wetland to wheatgrass (Agropyron sp., FAC to UPL), Canada thistle, and musk thistle in the upland. The approximately 20-foot separation between W-7- 04 and W-2-04 is relatively flat but consists of a slight downgradient slope from W-7-04 to W-2-04. Wetland W-7-04 was observed to be likely jurisdictional because of its close proximity to W-2-04 and its ultimate connection to a waters of the U.S.. The following table provides the area for the individual wetlands. Wetland Area Area Number (square feet) (acres) W-1-04 5053 0.12 W-2-04 60555 1.39 • W-3-04 216 0.01 W-4-04 38086 0.87 W-5-04 11585 0.27 W-6-04 158517 3.64 W-7-04 2802 0.06 AI KENYON NOBLE PROPERTY i - OZEMAN , GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA • µ r T2S, R5E, SECTION 1 .Y 4 7?8 T 6-1 • p` r, Yi • s • C I SITS r-a Ile pi 11 r11 _ !It -7fNOAT USGS QUADRANGLE TOPO MAP•BOZEMAN QUAD FIGURE 1 • WITH CITY PARCELS LAYER OVERLAID J "MORRISON PERKINS SHIM Im GRAPHIC SCALE J MAIERLE,INc. An Anyfoy-OumQ Com}any ' KENYON NOBLE PROPERTY . 600 0 300 600 Po&.,„a90„.IOK8,n.5MI•ft.(4X)E n, 1-140x1 -1116 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP CLIENT: ( IN FEET ) FIELD WORK: DATE:7-14-04 PLOTTED DATE: Dec/16/2004 - 03:11:26 pm DRAWN BY: KSS SCALE:1"=600' DRAWING NAME: 1 1nC7,•11 — 6'00 fa, H:\3948\001\ACAD\ENVIRONMENTAL\VICMAP.dwg 1. CHECKED BY:KS PROJ #:3948.001 SHEET 1 0F 1 71 21, 1; , i' IY •i � ,� y 1. , .k j •.fir <., •� .r .. ':X:.1. i.. i ws a ar +� t � Y CITY OF BOZEMAN 2000 ORTHOGAPHIC AERIAL WITH CITY F4RCELS LAYER OVERLAID FIGURE 2 J A-BRISCN MR= PERKINS AMERLE,INC. a KENYON NOBLE PROPERTY GRAPHIC SCALE AEF:IAL 1JIAP 6'-0 0 S[0 600 ENT:CL ( IN FEET ) FIELD WOPK L�PR ,7-14-04 PLOTTED DATE: De 16/2004 — 03 10:52 pm <SS 1"=600' DRAVAN3 V1\A: DR41VV BY: E: H:\3948\00,\0.;AD\EIl�.P.ONMEI-Pl\,rCMAP dvg 1 inch = 600 1 CW—CKED By KS #:3948.00- SHEET 1 OF 1 qj Vq•'.�' y��y M .•. N d.'�v s�' �'S��\ w R All tot all 171 -lI � '' •,R N�•=� � � fir' ` �; t � ':� �' �. �j A FR LEGEND: CITY OF BOZEMAN 2000'ORTHOGA?F:IC AERIAL 50B -BLACKDOG SILT LOAM,0.4%SLOPES WITH CITY PARCELS LAYER OVERLAID AND 506A-SAYPO SILT LOAM,0.2%SLOPES SSURGO SOILS DATA OVERLAID 509E-ENBAR LOAM,0.4%SLOPES 542A-BLOSSBERG LOAM,0-2%SLOPES FIGURE 3 JJ� VIC�RRIS.C'N Dmam PERKINS *-lERLE,INC. s KEN'r ON NOBLE PROPERTY GRAPHIC SCALE wR4, '19.W"l"'°"y 0 300 600 PO a n)oaR ttlot�as m.•m Y.srm•p�pa1J sham Fs(aq MI-1- 600 n C:EN-: SOILS MAP IN FEET FbD WORK r'DATE:7-14-04 PLO-TED _ATE: Dec/'6,2004 - 03:'0:00 pm DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: CSS ,SCALE:1 =600" H:\3948�0�1\ACAD\ENAR)N4ENTAL\'ACLIV.dwg 1 inch = 600 ft. CH_CkED BY KS ;PROJ #:3948.001 SHEET s DF i Ask rP i 1 II .yr- APEMC i f• ;;fir I, y in. -.-r.wn. .�,yir�yy, ;r� j � '� � �• d �1 + , �1 E ' t;'r i j. ;� �"^fi'�'-�ra�,r• ��;� .;� 3. -n'^q�" � ;Tr�,T ai'n A�=~ {[per•'{��}`-t e� �.. a,. • `, 1e t ' -y � '� -. S S'•4f ����.,-.jfr`7` � _-.I i ' �;' it .. jt;�' �j f` , _ •�rL ,ar3�.. r �jft - r � �' t �• '"t r.��.+d<F. a K� w. �.� ..^1. e^ �.: -._... . !� �� ��4� �;�✓`��r`• �4 �Juf ' � :?.fir ;r. J x' A � f -! ,.r, 3[[h�"[' y'frP, wit ♦ %r tiyya� ti �" � �!4 ti i f �it� `a •' a- .r � �= k � .a, .� �� '��l•r=c��jJF,i 1:" �/�A�/,r w' ;�k e� �yU �i < S t�' � I� i _ '��rT�^��'R\�}:ir 1 '. 'r' t'f•t, r"ti7 .r in��j �. .ri � +n cR -� t t �+' h � e A '! f .5 •. .fir 4Mj1 1,t L {�ft-- 1 " }' ,3''.•'r{ rs ? + ` I'i.. •d �pp 'r4— .«-•? 5 ,� ,+ "� _ � 4' .' + .�. d1 :ltl_ } + J ~1}'�.j �f r.�,.r-� {:T I ! ;'�' n � x �,fY r� �r'I� 5 r. _ ,15�t r, �z7, e. JFE •li � I [ ' i (� ( 4 J t t+"' ♦, �.��is Ir �. ,� � ''*� je}7<�,�. z i��. '"}'t`3z i 6 � ..� ,� L� -Neil...tj ., 1 ,S j�1,�r i+r$vP ',$: •tL 'r rt�.��'y���i ' •�' i-�t 1�}� s-'� ..p if i�!.� - �'�� - yik �", v �1,F: j. d y , ! r r e ? p ytl S e •M91 t.5�1��) `' 7r s .1 n F '14 t �� - � �.,"1•°771. r�. �d .. ��� '. ,+ ,•I.i�f� ;.� 3 1.. �+A� :�• v�. +t • .� a�� CITY OF BOZEMAN 2000 ORTHOGAPHIC AEP.AL LEGEND: WITH CITY PARCELS LAYER OVERLAID AND FEMAx•PalLatrine,Emergent,Tempo*arile+flooded,Excavated NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA OVERLAID FEMC -Falustrine, Emergent,Seasonally Flooded FEMCx•PaUtine,Emergent,Seasonally Flocded,Excavated FIGURE 4 ►�ORFISON PERKINS JJ rAAIERLE,-tNC. KENYON NOBLE PROPERTY GRAPHIC SCALE4,�p( ^-O C-.n•y 600 0 3CO 60C PO Ox„'% ".dam a ,+,.>onI• 14os1sPonI-a@ '-6 NATL. WETLAND INVY. MAP CLIENT: ( IN FEET ! FIELD WORK: DATE: 7-14-04 PLOTTED DATE: Dec/1'6/2301 - 03.09:23 pm r DRAWIN, NAHE: DRAN'�' B'f: KS` SCALE: =600' H:\.594.5\OC I\A;AD\EMARONMEhLk-;V CMAF.dx g 1 inch = 600 ft. CHECKED Br:KS PROJ #:3948.001 SHEET t OF' Appendix A -- --USAGE Data-Sheets--- ---- — Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: 5-1-04 1 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-1-04 [ ] Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species Common Name _ %Cover., Indicator - Herbaceous Cirsium arvense Thistle,Creeping FACU+ Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Mentha arvensis Mint,Field FACW- Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Typha latifolia Cattail,Broad-Leaf _ OBL_ „ %Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Greater than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Watermarks [ J Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks)' [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC:Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Tex'ure, in. Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure, 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 Silty Clay Loam Medium Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ J Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions ( J Listed on National Hycric Soils List [XI Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ J Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 0.4%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained. [ )Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks M Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: S-1-04 2 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26,2004 - Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT 'XI Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-1-04 ( ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant. .Species_.__..,_,.___- ____—______ Common Name _ %Cover Indicator- Herbaceous Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Cicuta douglasii Water-Hemlock,Western OBL Onopordum acanthium Scotch thistle No Status Chenopodium album lambsquarter,common No Status Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue FACU Taraxacum officinale Dandelion,Common FACU Cirsium arv_ense _._._... ___ Thistle,Creeping .. FACU+ %Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Less than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves --- — ------ Aerial Photograph-- ----- Water-m arks---- --- L-ocal-soil-surve data-- — [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ J Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Field Observations: Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ I Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >0 • Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, . (in.) Color_ Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc. 0-0 Rock Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [. .]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [. ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [. ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [.]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [ ]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509E Enbar loam 04%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Sample point was within a fill area with abundant cobbles;shovel refusal. ...Wetland Determination ......._..._. .._......;_._... ..._....._._:... _._..._.....__............. .. .._..._.. --._. __._:.._.._._......__.___.........._........ - .......... __._... [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This.Data Point is a Wetland [ ]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: 5-2-04 1 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ j Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-2-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species _ ._ Common Name _ _, .%Cover.._indicator Herbaceous Hieracium pratense Yellow hawkweed No Status Urtica dioica Nettle,Stinging FAC+ Cirsium arvense Thistle,Creeping FACU+ Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Glyceria striata Grass,Fow_I Manna OBL Juncus effusus Rush,Soft FACW Mentha arvensis Mint,Field n FACW- _ Phalaris arundinacea __ Grass,Reed Canary __ _ FAC_W Species that are *,OBL, FAC or FAC(except FAC-): >50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Greater than 50% FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [X]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels Stream,.Lake,or.Tide Gage-__ __._ ___- [X]Saturated in upper_.12 inches.. _ _. _ [._J Water-stained leaves__.__ [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [. ]Local soil survey data [ J Other(describe in remarks) [ J Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain,in remarks) • Depth of Surface Water(in.): 1 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in:)_ . Color Color _.._--_..Abundance_. Contrast .._ Structure,etc., 0-8 10YR 3/1 Sandy Clay Loam Fine Subangular Blocky 8-16 10YR 3/2 Loamy Sand Loose. Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking ( ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 04%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [XI This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks This is an unnamed tributary to Spring Creek. Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: 5-2-04 2 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26;2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-2-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species_-_.._ Common Name %o-Cover_Indicator ____�_ Herbaceous Conium maculatum Hemlock,poison No Status Chenopodium album lambsquarters,common No Status Centaurea maculosa Knapweed,Spotted No Status Onopordum acanthium Thistle,scotch No Status Carduus nutans Thistle,musk No Status Cirsiumarvense._.._...__ _ .. .._Thistle,Creeping_ ., -_. _-. .-. FACU+ %Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Less than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ J Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data ---- -` [ ]Other(describ&in"remarks)"--`—`[-]-Drift-lines"- -" --[—]`FAC=Neutraftest- Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >0 • Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle 12nd Mottle .Texture, (in.)_ Color Co or AbundanFe--7 Contrast Structure,etc. _... 0-0 Rock Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ .]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%°in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [' ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ )Listed on National Hydric.Soils List [ ]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 04%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Sample point was within a fill area with abundant cobbles;shovel refusal. Wetland Determination [ J Hydrophytic Vegetation Present - [ ]This Data Point is-a Wetland [ ]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Job Number: 3948.001 . Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: 5-3-04 1 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-3-04 ( ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant„ Species _ __. __ ____..__ .Common Name _ _ _ %Cover Indicator_ Herbaceous Cirsium arvense Thistle,Creeping FACU+ Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Typha latifolia Cattail,Broad-Leaf 95 OBL Shrub Salix exigua Willow,Sandbar OBL %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Greater than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ J Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data Other(describe in remarks)_ ..._ . [ ]Drift lines __ _. _. . _ .[X.]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >12 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc._ 0-12 A 10YR 4/1 Clay Loam Fine Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ J Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ J Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors , [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 04%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [XI Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Man-hole was located,in wetland. Fire hydrant was adjacenfto wetland. Job Number: 3948]01 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: S-3-04 u Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Dam: July%6.%0O4 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: GoUuUn Investigator: SR G�bs �T ' ]Donunnai��vm� �a��� e�v��n`e site? - ----------- -- ID: Upland —' - - i ]Have vegetation,soils,mrhydmlogyboondisturbod? Station ID: 8-3-04 Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dom i9qnt._.S.Pepi.els_'_ ___'_ _________-__%Cover-Indicator Herbaceous Salsify,western No Status Contaumamanmooa Knapwood.Gpottod No Status Cambuunumno Thistle,musk No Status 95L_ No Status_ Remarks Less than 50%FACo wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology.Indicators [ lRecorded Data(describe inremarks) [ l|nunda0od [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,ur Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12inches [ Water-stained leaves i Aerial Photograph [ Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data i )Other(describe inremarks) [ Drift lines [ ]FAC'Noutna|hoot [---Field Observationo Sediment deposits [ ]0�ar(�p|aininmmadm) `------' s� Dep���Su�moVVa��nl: 0 - ' Depth Uo Free Water inPit(in.): ,1O Depth bo Saturated Goils(in.): »10 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2ndMottle Texture, (in,,) Color Color Abundance L_Contrast__- Str cture,etc. 0'16' A 1OYR2/1 Clay Loam Medium uuumngu|orBlocky ` Hydric3oils Indicators [ ]Histosol Concretions [ ]HisUnEpipudnn []High Organic Y6in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking �' [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime . � [ ]Listed nn Local HyUho Soils.List. [ Reducing Conditions []Listed unNational Hydric Soils List ' [X]GleyodorLnw+ChmmoColors [ ]Other(explain in remurko)Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 04%slopes Taxonomy: ' ` . Cumuoc Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained � [ ]Field Observations.match map , ' , ` Wetland Determination [ ) HydmphyUc Vegetation Present This Data Point is°Wetland ^_____~ __�_����ydh��on �p��,� _-____---_-�_ ___-____-_____'__�-__-'........................ ..................... _'_`____- i ]WoUundHydrologyPmoan Remarks ' ` '` ' Job Number: 3948.001 • Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: S-4-04 1 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ )Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-4-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species .,_.. . Common Name _,__,_... ,___. %Cover. -.Indicator _ Herbaceous Galium aparine Bedstraw,Catchweed FACU Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Typha latifolia Cattail,Broad-Leaf OBL Cirsium aryense Thistle,Creeping FACU+_ Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-):>50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Dominance based on percent cover. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage. [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data ( ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test [ ]Field Observations:. Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) —... . ---. _ ..._ _ Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 • Remarks SOIIS Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.) Color .. Color .. . ..._Abundance ....Contrast Structure.,.etc. -. 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 10YR 4/2 common distinct Sandy Clay Loam Fine Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [. ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [X]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 04%slopes. Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [XI Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]-This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman • Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: S-4-04 2 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 26,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site Community ID: Upland [ ] Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-4-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species Common Name %o,Cover .Indicator__—__ _ Herbaceous Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Taraxacum oficinale Dandelion,Common FACU Agropyron repgns- ----------- .Quackgrass -- ....--........ _— - %Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Less than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ J Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ J Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ J Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ J Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) _[ J Drainage patterns in wetlands - - Depth of Surface Water(in: _):--0 —�—�—� Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.) Color Color Abundance - Contrast Structure etc. _ 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 Sandy Clay Loam Medium Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509E Enbar loam 0-4%'slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [. J Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ J This Data Point is a Wetland [X)Hydric Soils Present Wetland Hydrology.Present Remarks 0 , Job Number: 3948.001 • Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: S-5-04 1 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 27,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ )Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-5-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species Common Name %Cover-- Indicator Herbaceous Phalaris arundinacea Grass,Reed Canary FACW Epilobium ciliatum Willow-Herb,Hairy FACW- Geum macrophyllum Avens,Large-Leaf FACW- Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Cirsium arvense Thistle,Creeping FACU+ Mentha arvensis Mint,Field FACW- Typha latifolia Cattail,Broad-Leaf OBL Shrub Corpus stolonifera Dogwood,Red-Osier FACW Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry FACU Salix spp.. .._„ Willow spp. . NI, OBL-FAC 0/6 Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Greater than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ J Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves • [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Water marks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: ( J Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 2 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.) _ Color ._,_____.____Color __Abundance Contrast_. . Structure,etc. 0-8 A 10YR 2/1 Sandy Clay Loam Medium Subangular Blocky 8-18 B GLEY1 4/5GY 7.5YR 3/3 few prominent Sandy Clay Coarse Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer ( ]Sulfidic Odor [ J Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [X]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ J Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 0.4%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ J Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination • [X]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks This wetland contains a portion of Spring Creek. Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: ,S-5-04 2 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 27,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-5-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant Species__—_- _ Common_Name %Cover Indicator Herbaceous Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue FACU Agropyron repens Quackgrass FAC- Shrub Rosa woodsh Rose,Woods FACU Symphoricarpos albus _ Snowberry_ _ __FACU Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50 Cowardin Classification: Remarks Less than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ ]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ ]Inundated I [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ ]Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves [ ]Aerial Photograph [ )Watermarks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test ]-Sediment deposits"— —["]Other-(explain in-remarks) Field Observations: Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 [ ] Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks • Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, in. Color Color Abundance Contrast _Structure,etc. _ 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 Silt Loam Mediu__-_m Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X].Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 509B Enbar loam 04%slopes Taxonomy: Cumulic Haplustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ )Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This Data Point`is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks 0 • Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: 5-6-04 1 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 27,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Wetland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-6-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 1 Vegetation Dominant Species _ _ _ Common Name _ _ %Cover. Indicator Herbaceous Glyceria striata Grass,Fowl Manna OBL Alopecurus pratensis Foxtail,Meadow FACW Trifolium repens Clover,White FAC Trifolium hybridum Clover,Alsike FAC Scirpus microcarpus Bulrush,Small-Fruit OBL Carex rostrata Sedge,Beaked OBL Deschampsia cespitosa Hairgrass,Tufted FACW Shrub _ Ribes lacustre Currant Prickly FAC+ Species that are OBL,FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): >50 or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Greater than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [X]Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [X]Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage] g [X]Saturated in upper 12 inches —pp [ ]Water-stained leaves [X]Aerial Photograph [ ]Watermarks [ ]Local soil survey data [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [X]FAC-Neutral test • Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 2 [X]Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): 0 Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): 0 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, (in.) Color_ ,.. Color _. _Abundance. ..Contrast Structure,etc. 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 10YR 4/1 common distinct Silt Loam Coarse Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [ ]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic°/D in Surface Layer [ ]Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [X]Reducing Conditions [ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 506A Saypo silt loam 0-2%slopes Taxonomy: Aquic Calciustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [X].Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [X]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [X]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks ' This wetland contains a portion of Spring Creek. Job Number: 3948.001 Data Form City: Bozeman Routine Wetland Determination Wetland Data Point: S-6-04 2 Project/Site: Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Date: July 27,2004 Applicant/Owner: Perkins County: Gallatin Investigator: SR State: MT [X]Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Community ID: Upland [ ]Have vegetation,soils,or hydrology been disturbed? Station ID: S-6-04 [ ]Is the area a potential problem area? Plot ID: 2 Vegetation Dominant.,.Species._.. ., ._ .,_ Common Name %Cover. Indicator----.--.—. Herbaceous Cirsium arvense Thistle,Creeping FACU+ Poa palustris Bluegrass,Fowl FAC Agropyron trachycaulum Wheatgrass,Slender FAC Taraxacum officinale Dandelion,Common FACU Trifolium repens Clover,White FAC Shrub Species that are OBL, FACW,or FAC(except FAC-): <50 FAC or wetter Cowardin Classification: Remarks Dominance based on percent cover.Less than 50%FAC or wetter vegetation. Hydrology Primary Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Hydrology Indicators [ J Recorded Data(describe in remarks) [ J Inundated [ ]Oxidized root channels [ ]Stream,Lake,or Tide Gage [ J Saturated in upper 12 inches [ ]Water-stained leaves Aerial Photograph _.-.__.---[_-]_Local_soil-survey_data—_-_—_--.._ [ ]Other(describe in remarks) [ ]Drift lines [ ]FAC-Neutral test Field Observations: [ ]Sediment deposits [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Depth of Surface Water(in.): 0 I ].Drainage patterns in wetlands Depth to Free Water in Pit(in.): >16 • Depth to Saturated Soils(in.): >16 Remarks Soils Depth Hor. Matrix Mottle/2nd Mottle Texture, .(in.) Color Color Abundance Contrast Structure,etc. 0-16 A 10YR 2/1 Silty Clay Loam Medium Subangular Blocky Hydric Soils Indicators [.]Histosol [ ]Concretions [ ]Histic Epipedon [ ]High Organic%in Surface Layer [ )Sulfidic Odor [ ]Organic Streaking [ ]Probable Aquatic Moist Regime [ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List [ ]Reducing Conditions ( ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List [X]Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Other(explain in remarks) Unit Name: 506A Saypo silt loam 0-2%slopes Taxonomy: Aquic Calciustolls Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained [ ]Field Observations match map Remarks Wetland Determination [ ]Hydrophytic Vegetation Present [ ]This Data Point is a Wetland [X]Hydric Soils Present [ ]Wetland Hydrology Present Remarks - - -------- Appendix B— --- - — • Photographs r Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Photographs Pa e 1 Y P Yg Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group December 2004 • .sz ar ;yr aW Mtn V �DIM "'•'� e .i fe im 9 1r t�'•� n l�� � ( � 1 yt r �{' �ti� `,�il�aJ� t11`}t� a �. ` a "�'e !\,y \ m�.r Ax G�f t� g. I�(8n'���d 4 r��ik��fl +. 'fit r�! �,_.,.,a•��Ik.y�, � .7 '"�kttWt��r f 5 � 'ro����i'�,s�"/�� r ��' L�r:f�12.�tt� t t {" j+� ��y� ��� ��{�+ ' ,ti y f f e� y �a^�`'"`'��, �` `� J End(a, q dw,�s` ►� � try,` ,,(��,�+�t '�:� ) . e^4��,e ea/ wni ,,{yF 1�y., x f� r,.� r A. 7';i+ atr.���...-d nr.:�l�y"�'.s r '`f'•c�d'6 ,�' i � ��� � `�es�rr��.,�/1'. �� —_�_.—_ . F ,s r .! ,.� .`� �, �'4Sf^v�itlw 1"T('`°;--�^ �,` ��i�6•' ,�0 1' -,, '1 +l C ' �` t+ •t\;to � ,Y "' •Fr.° •+�A j7 Yt� rt �{,�t 'S+� f��'r � ,�y���• r ; t�+'f � r � , �����tt��,<��� ,tk 'tt{ � r• ,;� Ater ti: ! }�t �+� � � •'.��j �4 � ',6 L!-. {lf� i 1}A�`��fi 1�e ,'tiwrR ��ip.� y�� ^�' � ti ff ��f ?�`, r 11 +�l t + ''1 ` ) S t� (i': +r ✓� Y" 1 iNyc� 'F r OfdY( t f -M� '' � ,,� .1 t��y"+ f�;&'/i{t � \S'�f ���1 l!���•.:',�`�..,jam •, � ���� t+"."F ,r:� ,t; }:rye. �/ 4�r'A: :Ifi,�' :DI���P.:�:•R: !A 11���:6��':kln�9:.:Y.O?7C9 :����`.r,.� :�YSV .. (-,.t ws�.`�R�b ' Photo 1: View north of S-1-04,1, wetland data point. a "t.Rfar d "f e '. "' ;�s2: �" ak,e,*+;«,:,.''e:ne k . .;M.f' 1'< y�+.s 'E 3l<Te�',.'.. wy t ` Z -tJ. ir`' ` .. �e:r ,.t�}„'d' '.S 6'Sar++ wY• i ° � ~ f F i..+ " " � ' �.✓.v P °r'S c �'�C �F J' fi V�...�. .:'�,at..i'' v.. ..f`t, { { ,•Iv rr ��t i .:�f L•.�fs7 :.� � 4• .�^ "ti `} '•` 'yf,.eae + ( r� �d�f', '1 � ��`* '• • i,h ?� �!{i s fa I„ f{•.: + Ail :'�JR'•4?ld 6,�� f t ,p�4j. y t ..f..�'L ' t +`Y'� 1}, ���. • � t.�•ti �n','j �� � �Nr,.fl.rljjjj( �7�'f'' , j �7',��`� •,t, q�'t.R 1,' '� _ b,'� ' � ..4�r.�',1�•',. '�r,'t 7.3 31. f ,1. ,' ,� �91f e �1 l �e t It �� . F ,'/"ti:l .:� d �p1 !1 ' J r ! }� � �j I�I, 1+1!•: 91F� �,1 : • �Nwi l6 k � •'l; ,( t)x17� 1 � j':-(e♦ `��r: 1 , ; �.1�f1Y/i� '�ur� t �o�i�q i b! , r } �►'A,!^I.• +p'3 ' o ,, k' ; F r�+ �t. r ti'gir, ' i t �� e� 1•r r�:�i; .h Y'A^1J, vt�.�; �J ijr '�(' y(k.. �� 2. g•1 y�����i°` e ;Y f�Z,fie';• ^�� �'f- �` /� v r:d t}•"/.a;ti' 0nii '� �171�.�/,.•..� +'t'.�,:. �Hk, 7�{Y % •�'1'�'!<•� j��� ��':L�?���:.>�, '•�/''�' t ^.! a��°'�����f����1;y�,��i1.��, Sri>ri�� �'.:�:.r ��)�y,,yy�,'I} . 176 ,� v i,• .A� � s � i '9 .�� r + '. 6.;t�: s 't tTxt ..y'�,;J ..1,3�1�gr7'Nt'tl�i� ,K�vr/�J r� �����+y�.,'����� '��'Y '�,; �f��' IN�.:I••f?��1• ,.,•. r ,''%1�e.1�/{�°fd'� �� �-�'f. `?' .�, �f`�'' ' r��% / � ��,t�. �: ', ,,'o.�,�?�r Z"' J(� t' �,' >.�c•: - E�`, �'Y lY• ate 1'Gt �' .,� ��',�}, q�ip- l�'is�fl , � F P� .. /a'�%�`• � ��'' �i k `=r, 4v •, �' f'y q//(r�;, { of ( ' j �q','k,' �r�:'ilf. 'r �.1: .�,r Ttr, i,'•'�'�,,fl y '' v ���'�:i ,, , , ,J � f,�''Y" ,5.�+ !' ) Jyyy�{,ISf. � :Y`��`?+ ;a��{„p��J���.,(�ki,{11�t�'' t�.�:t,rj.l.%l�A�,,�},. {`�1 �. 7�1��,�:,� ,.J�`•,�:�t..�.'a��j��'i�..!''�',•I,:�i•'�,+ N. 4 �, ,, SCf.�k�:�{'(�+�/ j,' D1t/r. b.• .0 '/a ;t CA �u�,3 f`t:�v' �. r:rcrY':� r•''�•$ lit }i fJ Z t ' �.,CVfv.� aFsA/J:' .: r..j '.I f ,�r rat Photo 2: View south of S-1'04 2,.upland data point. • i Perkins/ Kenyon Noble Property Photographs Page 2 ® Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group December 2004 �rh r 11 •lil•r.�.�•,I':�• •I, =r•.i/ •� 1 .1 - !`��.'v r •-`�1,wa, -4 1 •�I ! 111 .••1•.f i~ yd fled •li , ` '.S„"`I-�, � � Y :• + •.' `t����'r �y ',•,♦, ♦� �If'e`}�+,: All '7[` ��y + +•' � , • i•J Jti � ray„�} 7^ '' r�`rt"Y �. " �y,�., .; J r id tt,' f �/1 !� ♦ ''� .�1 �' " J ^ ,•t I: r i,':4•r' 4 �. r ��Z�f'+j, �+''�� 1' i f/✓4 .r , ., �. 's'11 •4 Y �� 1s.fj _ `d '.`. .+''�r' , f' i� •�• r`!'� {+•,,�y lf�au. ^+��'ilr� � (j�-�pa� .11 lir �Yr �� �',�{J •�'i ' • 'h F ',"WI 1 �'""t �" •ivy r ��1,1 kW Z ��d„y. ':`'�, �, ,"�'' .�'1 f ��:;r�.Fe. ��� ,, ;,,,,,,M• � .�:'�ly.,J, �s�,-e •i? {Y,'\ a��{ L�`� n �yy.� ^�•�/�'��{., '"J� r��.4 '�+kr��'t ^1 )tt. �i''�'7��.��.. ,+r r� .�,•'i 1, M V � ^ n;+vy� 1M Y/ttrjr+{•1 ',,.�f ', 'k If r �' 1 + `+y�,`� t'r, •{> 1 ,111 ZN r•CT !' , 1< '�"{•,(`��& 1 �•Ft�' �14�!��� y��t '. �:�h '� �'� - !. ����, '��1.�1 �Y1�'�' E� �i =i�"`',���'���YY h',, � 1✓`��.,;,3', " '� �;w�l d'l j .. � .''\f� ���s�',11,r Photo 3: View northwest of S-2-04 1,wetland data point. +11 F 1... + �' ' r �. ',7 t; � I ,+ i�is t• r,' l �� 1``; � ii� �Ii S "6' •4• L t 1 r � 1 . ♦ / / � (yam• Ti r r r. 7 `� , , �,. � Y 11 N�,' 1[�� f•1. Y - 1 ,� � � � �'J6_���:•{ •Ir• i -•1,•rc,n-.'-,�.�i.rl,' `5" .tom 'i ., ,. ,, •,1 /. .I�, t� , �t ' rJ� '.'" '�'�� • ''� �,r''1r'�Ip � �[�� • `♦,�,IMI+f�' {',Y� •;� + �' '; + ,1 r .� ,. �il-''+.� :�+. e•r +,, '� .'�' 1 �"tJ��.'•,t,.:5 .a �� +1�' '�,'� � 1 •��+iil�''Fj fir'• V' r +' 11,. +1 4,1� !�'r: f� / +fir i7, ��+ -iMr� 1 / �� H � �; 1 ',�r, t' r1 •/ .._A+til F+'ti, r 1 t ��� �,�A"/w,�y r�r�,�r Ir4 1{� t� A 111' '� 'tkt' '1 r. � _ Jv t � ��irr.,r�ll �', 1�1V�1.�r���. �y�, �� ,1���. r r •� ', 1 . Yr 1 1�'• �r� r� l»�l�l/ Y,r }+t [ ,l�1:�y. :.rl},rl"�"rr~ ';�S•`�, 4rE�l.y}, 1 • �,Ir � ! t ' ''/t , '♦r, ,i'I ' t"1 �,fit . l/0 }l.rk rC u'tii '''' ' t'r ' �."• ' ' ,r r� _ - '1. i.+ f•` R h�!y t,� + fir 1'♦ Q'}h `I'�Y.r ,l.•1 7:7. �'+ ,i"7 �, ,'�. i .l. d "�/1.�<. kr 4,�+�1P ,. ', i/ l:;• lo'Y i�<k:.ttS '1 r�. <4\ • 'i , �. t + �Y i a,e..`• A'� !!* ^rl 1. i�;tw\ t�. ��•1 t�:��� 't , ♦t ( j' ' .Y /ram+ i'::1���'��`.�`fse�• 't, ''�iiY•.t1�.st`'at`I'1�2'_.,.,K.'R. ��J'If !�., .�+ r ? ir.+ • , � IPr W�1 Photo 4: View west of S-2-04 2, upland data point. Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Photographs Page 3 Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group December 2004 •/..•r• .. - •ems •; ` ` •1 ' •\ ' j�+,�1 �`{ )/ �� ��� � i � t �\ \ • Sty �,lr'` ",•` � • � i 1'�f 'LlL r r�: T '{' � �� 0.,t�► //►�1 1 / ,�t`�j�� �•{� ,' ,� t Wl'1i !� ! •! i, �' � -iZ 'n !� � � �• � fM'!' ^t''• t �H" , �, �� 1.`;��'-�SI, r 4 rJ1 Fr mm`` J I t f( s!► y ��� ! arWWWW '��r)�� ,t� i �, � , r'�y, ► , Y ,� x�• 't44,,j�,''11���� S•t�• ^4� .� v� 31 1 rj 1 �1, 1f }�'� j.'`'``lgis'.1�J 1��,d�„ ,M.- �' X�,q1 j�^'��:�t+� •s�! �{'' �� ! ��'(�� y� •y��,(�i, ! ; !a,'9 'i�l;y Vim •��"�,��"•S��jlw�'�W�!s: i'�:.1 ', ' 1 1:, Y' ,rA. � 'tea\ ,�`t�f J •�i\�'r .ti;Yilt tdy K. } Y'I: . 4 •,l '„w l" i�,�,1 � 4y1 �• �`, , � ;,' "�e v �,1 1 ,�ti.,�•, rs'�.1�`�j��`�I w:,�7li {!� �,;' s �': :v ��•� ('�' ��i� �' r. .K tY `r,✓µlbl�'�r t i r.2I��"��r! Yn�(''► ,'r� s;' �`' }�: ;C. :t.iiattA�r�, �, y �.� tN,Y� tl .. v'iy �jj. f £+' • t F t`..��].`.y rC`' `,to �y (_} 1ri:tic _ ,+ J K�S� • h. pf1 ` �1, �' t /tL1 `, i f t Photo 5: View northeast of S-3-04 1, wetland data point. L'j{.M•� 1� 7,4 iA�':'"�r"; •s i#' r 5 .2 r►..` t +•` # :+11' 1 s1 l� Y 'j! , j,f •«I ,�+�('b !,rat ,1 r• , ,j # ! 1� q ip7 'r"�F�r1.• �''t t,i ''1 �•� /!. : -�\r+\!. , ry�t w �_�`� �\�ti,ti f:.` "� 1 +'����,l� f •��a' ;. i rrr 4i1}q. ^f�rq•� 1,}'E''''t' 7�}r�: �"� ' �7 1� �� f a� 1 �r 4 i J�Ys' •7 rrrt'Si'��t j�• r (' au'R'7ry 1 �'t� � r•'� � r; M`y�.., 1 �; j�}{yryjr a t ( °J t � ,[V .f y.1 , '•��t , .: u.� 't,t� � ri -f✓�t►fll✓FQF • j - r !!�'x." •�.�.t'Jf • �_.t,*- (f�i�,�� Ys'.1� y�ti �'t'y r� y /K1. F 1,ll r c. 4 s ++ S �• 4 � � 1 ,� ` t 1 F�.T r�7 ��3.t�hj iai(..•4' t► J {j`x l r t�T ` `� '`S�.isy" _ ! 'a s'S'"yj� y/r�y',/� �f•� [, 'l"1 "`4!Xt l J t� r. l \ f`,'1�,,`t'if•t� A� ' 'j,PY, �l�� '��r �A"•�1 ��Ir t�'� �/�1'.•i, ��������ti� �� r�N� � 1� �,� , /( x-1 l( �� X r ,� r�`•!�[ •�,�{{!�1� tsY t`;� ,�4 i;yt- lll„�(�.'.�'if' J.f �j 4 (• �, .i - 4t " `7 Y' �+� ► �� � ( �rle � y,,(ldptil�'•.:� ,t�•• ii� ,� i �. sib �;,���(../I� 1 *� ,` r 9� 11�1 \i,�e�t,���r�-.�,'•1����1 �" ��r r., q .�, �"Yl. �j I• �i► AVM\`� �;:�Z^,�,: .fir t �'{ ! .•il �� 1 b ( trAVt� Photo 6: View northwest of S-3-04 2, upland data point. 0 • Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Photographs Page 4 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group December 2004 � •1 r �� i�r t t H.a J��{�rl �I��i• iF -. ,` H t� ,,.)�t'��{ ' a �) ��- `� �.•r� ' ' � ,.��! t1.i!� ��,�r .j:i ,�ft:�F ,�N S �'- 'S: ., !` � t�'Y �) �r\ N..,.r a( •� 1 ]{ : �� / 'i fist �*•f`� 2 '� ( r � - ��1 ' 1. }•� / t1 •�� ti� t� �f � } 1rt3.4. {;tr .,�•y' "'o}� 't, I �e q. �� A5 1„`��.�'��1�!�1�•,y�A�11, }'' �t •�{� Lr►�� �4�l'11� y1`iu'_� f �. �t �� � t� /// it�( �};tynS,f Y''� �',k.' �- ,i�:f�tl"it �r�,' Ott! i���~ ' ".'.�i.�,ry��\l~ F�•� fh `t r�.\r. �. � !^ � ,.0 `♦ �i"yy��'r�i. t�1`�1,`�#^,l�'•1" :�i��?''�Y�Fy,•1V'��tif� �}i� �j\ti .��k� t '`15:; �'. . +✓Y� Vi �j,�KtC',fr.+ t,n.{`tF FF'+1'' �.• 4 Si i� � �`''�f. l�-ii�t 1 � t'1 y��tilT yvt. �j f\ ��\� V f i'\• � f� ','�.t 4 �� '����t1!�ti!•'jl����'p '.���;'v+ 'wi�?py��,>rl•�, 'tAyt�yt, ;jf, 11 f 1. t y 11 a�`1Ka l; ,.t S t �y_'�t►:.�A 4 ��.� .i�� 3 { �ii f' c, `r, Photo 7: View northwest of S-4-04 1, wetland data point. �f- :; :t Photo 8: View south 0f S-4-04 2,upland data point. r Perkins/Kenyon Nob e Property Photographs Page 5 Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group December 2004 • J �!'�\ f y ♦ � Y! firr`, !F``� �� I1(.,�� +ram ,•-A. �r� ) V{• �� � i 7i�,\ �\LV •rg� J�f^ r. !¢� \ I{1eM 11c l Cj' t'yy+t i .a�(L, py�4�/) , It r ai � t �r1p l�"67••��'h a ..'ii .4,'L�. � c J�fr. r a.'�}t zl h' l_4y.1 .i.' lr .•fi S ��' �1 {14�°E' r�`;��:rt'k'T•r�S•"(,ri�.;,L;•! ,�.� t_„s'`' ",�%�Git�.»,Iy ��.4'r �'' �S�1����i,Y?il..n�:4.•�i:4G i�1°�'�fs. `•9���.'i'" �.'et�>G`d�wk!' .t cli( , Photo 9: View south of S-5-04 1, wetland data point. qe+i; i yc V.. {�� ' + � f 'f sfe�"• ..}r ' fin'.:. ,y a,i i.� 70, AA , • -tt�'�l ,•��'f d'�i. ,4�Yi+ t/M )��� 3r-�f! , �j'e�.^t, r ���T, �r �,�r .w;.'! �'��;9 �h• ��f.fir d ?a '�-..4;?5 �i'L�P"tsg7r_lii ��}�•ltah�3���� �:�"hi' Photo 10: View;west of.S-5704 2, upland data point.. • 0 Perkins/Kenyon Noble Property Photographs Page 6 • Morrison-Maierle, Inc., Environmental Services Group Dm1ceni=er 20CL 'WA icy 46, Ny,rA +t.1 f µit 66 P ' ^ ?ii f� i ✓ . 15 r{ �} -. 21��� 'T`. ���,�� S��r� �{ft r.� f � yt � fairf"S i.*1. .+c, .:',a. i +ri.�"►,*F'`�i����"+�*^.. P;A' fill 14 y ���'�'AM( ,�+"f�+�•i I r+•'I.r{�•�i�j F•4��ik„l.'a i""�q .,- ( { .* .�'�"f+� ,4� ,1i a� a'!t llli�I•�1 t1+ ;," `ti:,it , 1��1 '�l. �±�,��,C_ l�dfi.-� �1.rf�' +� f-.t tea'^�E�• _'! J'-�,• ` �"'��"",�`'•'1 F'.' � ^•(,►�"'A1•NjJ:,�,�0 ,� `,,.'��tJ-,f -^'�'�i•�� i F�'7,�.ziM`---- yf� r l�. .sj.ljrlyyt y./���? ��.�i. t.'l. '3 -s+ x �L•`j!if `mat � [ .}� +I�,N wi, �F111 Lr �ir• +� 'a,• • ''` ,�.�. � t, "�M,� tr �tt••t i i` ,� �J����»-r• � `^y"���,.L 1 I t'�I, . i t FN.tj�.,,�� , t ii�iy the /�Sr ('�: r f-i4 JY•a �t� ' r4 �• /IbaL ��•i• jTp ! t t t•;4}(,, J Y :.��i�'+ � at�� 7�r `t� f� f•,fi� �,i "�� i'i �,i;tt {�f+ t 'a�j'.d8t�':� r+�,�,+�YIY�y i/ �'!"t -(5 t fa �III' 1 rRr,i1!•! I r r r �. 1_ �i�,� r�1 � t�'c;y��'' !f 'A•r� ,/A .)d 4- r,t- . _��`1?(�E v' �i,� .S. . ,,�Jd�'��j')fit.-i'-t'.���ll j�� {` '����� •�l��;i,•r'�-+�s.�JP,�*7���f' �1r''l��f,',' " ��j"/r��, �S yj' 't;� ��-4yr- _�f`��p�� ��-`�''?M,� ",R, Ja. ..3.....la"'�tiw��i'.It,.�tr�'f�•'.LtdieCir�4�"�.l�A&.J,.X,......�- '"•.�,:G}a:itsi(Ilc'f-;.�a.�A�tYi�.fs�tr.S�LjJ[A-.��r'':� �..w Photo 11: View southeast of S-6-04 1, wetland data point. 1 r y y 1 • Photo 12: View west of S-6-04 2, upland data point. r , V. ��+7' wit j• _r , 1 "``��I. :r..l�y '► �N ., ''44. •.Y_] {j J e "k` "t r I• Ik_ 1 1 �r �� �-, � � 4 'yam � _} r, � , r " * �' �� � r:4 y[ a'',�`•. �`�'�;* j �.f�I�r ta�n'�;• ?11! q� (� � r ) ` .'�F:� ems. � �• �i -\ `1 tr:� r 4 ., ?�.M + oil S4-04-2 ,• ^�'_ ..ter._-} -� ""'`'` .,, � W-6-04 W-Y ;0 I r S3 04=r1" - C + , '•��,'1�r�"fi-' ;tom ••f 1N— 7 -04-1 04-2 fir�l S 1 4 2 nr ' lr. Yll `/ I:r ` f :5•r F It a 1 � ti• " � r•'� it APPROKIM TE INVESTIG TIO'N AREA' �a if -TZ A— �'°^�'�-'�^�,-.. ..n+.� - - - - , --•' ''- ""�i�^"�SIC'.iAC:.�i';�.�r'•' .sl'F _++''A.. _ .r ......+,---,e.o..w..•rr_.-- .,y-4.,. y �� - _..t' +!"*'aellCiiL. 1t'�`.:.,A. 'Y 7NJc•Slt-. "OAK`STREET'M4, t .• ' ' ^ • . ,` tFfF r 1. i 4..♦ � ' •~ r•�[�J'{ LEGEND i CS-2-04-2 SAMPLE POINT W-7-04 WETLAND � EXHIBIT A WETLAND EXTENDS OFF PROPERTY AMORRISONr PERKINS/KENYONNOBLE MAIERLE,INC. WETLAND GRAPHIC SCALE "°"°�"� �"" r� n r,,,,ni,.....�+.�..•N.rm.�Iw)•,am r.Ier,y,-„n DELINATION MAP 200 0 100 200 CLIENT:PERKINS FIELD WORK DATE;10/14/04 PLOTTED DATE: Dec/16/2004 - 04:00:54 pm ( SR/MRH/KW DRAWING NAME:IN FEET ) DRAWN 8Y: SCALE: H:\se4e\oc:\'""\Wnwms\WET1AHo.a.g CHECKED SYdR I PROJ y-WEIlANDS SHEET i OF I oromo '4 r----� F i D -� w � m a � � � � c , Q AM, W •_ 0 0 �C dh traffic Traffic Impact Study services PT land Property Commercial Development Bozeman, Montana Prepared For: Morrison Maierle, Inc 306 W. Railroad Street, Suite 105 Missoula, MT 59802 May, 2006 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana 59601 406-459-1443 • a PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana • Table of Contents A. Project Description .....................................................................................1 B. Existing Conditions.....................................................................................2 Adjacent Roadways ..............................................................................2 Traffic Data Collection...........................................................................3 Additional Developments.......................................................................3 Levelof Service.....................................................................................4 C. Proposed Development..............................................................................6 D. Trip Generation and Assignment................................................................8 E. Trip Distribution ..........................................................................................8 F. Traffic Impacts Outside of the Development...............................................8 G. Impact Summary......................................................................................11 H. Recommendations....................................................................................11 List of Figures Figure 1 — Proposed Development Site...................................................................1 Figure 2— Proposed Development..........................................................................7 Figure 3— Trip Distribution......................................................................................9 I List of Tables Table 1 — 2006 Level of Service Summary..............................................................5 Table 2— 2015 Level of Service Summary Without Development...........................6 Table 3— Trip Generation Rates.............................................................................8 Table 4— 2015 Level of Service Summary With PT Land Development.................9 i • PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana Traffic Impact Study PT Land Development Bozeman, Montana A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from a proposed 48 acre industrial and commercial development in Bozeman,Montana. The document also identifies any traffic mitigation efforts that the development may require. The site is located south of Baxter Lane just north of the new Kenyon Noble Hardware Store. Fi ure 1- Proposed Development Site NigPSV6ST 13 � 19000 0 y Q a � Ravihlde Rdg .. Baot_Hill_ t Q�, K 2 _r r Mea ow Ln W Bazte Mandeville Ln Ma evI4_ -W Glift Wheat Dr Proposed Development Site I Oak St W Oak St — he 'ler Dr J Ma I ood St avrs-5r Mlrllan Tr � �kov�s onone Td ztltlW Uc St I k0l Fort Be on Hemlock st Is Cl Trl w And k W u St z amarackSt Nera rGt As en t 0 g ©D hartotte 3f D _ Durston Rd Durston Rd W Peach S! m 4)2006 MaDQuest,Inc.;0 2006 We Atlas • Abelin Traffic Services 1 May,2006 PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana • B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development site currently consists of undeveloped farm and ranch land. The areas around the site are experiencing heavy amounts of commercial development. The property is located south of Baxter Lane between 15th Avenue and 1 lth Avenue. See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Adjacent Roadways North 191h Avenue is the primary north/south route through the western portion of Bozeman. This principal arterial route has a five-lane cross-section for most of its length. The intersections with Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane, and Oak Street are currently signalized. The 191h Avenue corridor is currently experiencing extremely high rates of growth due to development all along the corridor. Traffic data collected by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) in 2004 indicates that the roadway currently carries 24,000 VPD. North 15th Avenue is a recently constructed roadway that provides access to residential areas south of Oak Street. The roadway has a paved width of 45 feet with bike lanes on both sides and is designated as a collector route. The intersection with Oak Street has been improved to include designated left/through and right-only turn lanes for northbound and southbound traffic. Field observations identified a problem with this configuration. The opposing left/through lanes • oppose each other across the intersection. Drivers attempting to cross the intersection in the left/through lane from the north or south are directed into the opposing left/through lane. This is an inoperable configuration. The lanes should be restriped to left-only and through/right lanes on both sides. North 14th Avenue runs from the newly constructed residential areas south of Oak Street past the new Kenyon Noble Hardware store and into the proposed development site. The roadway has an urban cross-section and a paved width of 32 feet. North 111h Avenue passes along the eastern end of the proposed development site. The roadway begins in a residential area south of Oak Street and ends at Baxter Lane. The route is designated as an urban collector. The roadway currently carries 400 VPD and has a paved width of 38 feet. North 7th Avenue is another primary north/south route through the City of Bozeman. The roadway is a principal arterial route and has a four-to-five lane cross-section from the Griffin Drive to Main Street. Traffic data collected by the MDT in 2004 indicates that the roadway currently carries 22,000 VPD south of Oak Street. The intersection with Oak Street is currently signalized. Abelin Traffic Services 2 May, 2006 . PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana Baxter Lane is an east/west collector route that connects North 7th Avenue with North 19th Avenue and continues out into the valley. The roadway has a paved width of 24 feet with grass and gravel shoulder. The roadway currently carries 3,600 VPD east of North 19th Avenue. The intersection of Baxter Lane and North 7th Avenue is currently restricted to right-out only operations. The proximity of this intersection to the signalized Oak Street intersection and I-90 ramps make this location inappropriate for the installation of an additional traffic signal. Tschache Lane is an east/west route that connects several of the commercial areas via a signalized intersection across North 19th Avenue. Currently the roadway connects the Home Depot Home Improvement store to the northern end of the Bridger Peaks shopping center. Oak Street is an east/west principal arterial route through the northern portion of Bozeman. The roadway currently has one eastbound lane,two westbound lanes,and a center two-way left-turn lane. The roadway currently carries 13,000 VPD. Traffic Data Collection Abelin Traffic Services(ATS)collected peak-hour turning movement count data in April 2006 at the critical intersections around the proposed development to supplement traffic data already available for the area. These intersections included: • 19th Avenue&Baxter • Oak& 15th Avenue • Oak& 14th Avenue • Oak& 11 th Avenue Twenty-four-hour hose count data was also collected along Baxter Lane and I Ith Avenue. See Appendix A for the traffic volume information. Additional Developments Additional information for the area was obtained from four traffic impact studies (TIS) prepared for this area. These traffic studies included: • Mandeville Development, Robert Peccia & Associates, 2006. This 225-acre development is located north of Interstate 90 off of Griffin Drive and would be intended for a variety of light and heavy industrial land uses, warehousing, and manufacturing. Full build-out of the property is anticipated by 2015. Once completed the development will produce 9,000 new trips to the area.No mitigation measures were recommended from this study for any of the intersections studied for PT Land development. • Abelin Traffic Services 3 May,2006 PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana • Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse PUD, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2005. The property directly to the west of the PT Land north of Tschache Lane is being proposed for the construction of a Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. In addition to the hardware store the site may also include retail space, banks, and a professional office. The site would produce up to 10,000 new trips to the area when completed in 2015. The mitigation measures recommended for this project include the installation of a through/right lane and a designated left-turn lane for westbound traffic at the intersection of 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane and the installation of a right-turn lane for westbound traffic at Baxter Lane. The traffic study also recommended that left-turn signal phases be created at both Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane. • Stoneridg_e Commercial Subdivision,Kerin&Associates,2005. This development will be a major retail business center west of 19th Avenue. Full development of the site is expected by 2014. The traffic study estimated that the site would produce up to 10,000 new daily trips to the area. The TIS also included traffic data from the West Winds development TIS prepared by HKM. The mitigation measures recommended in the TIS included the construction of a left-turn lane for eastbound traffic on Tschache Lane at 19th Avenue. Dual-left turn lanes for eastbound, westbound, and southbound traffic as well as the eastbound, westbound, and southbound right-turn lanes should be constructed at the Oak Street/19th Avenue intersection. • Walton Homestead Subdivision,Marvin & Associates,2002. This residential and commercial/office development is nearing completion south of Oak Street. Once completed the site will produce 3,500 new trips. No mitigation measures were recommended north of Oak Street for this project. ATS also applied data from the Bridger Peaks Village residential development plans west of 15th Avenue on Oak Street. This development will include a 41 unit apartment building for seniors and 15 apartments units for adults with physical disabilities. Trip generation numbers for this development were calculated and applied to the future traffic volume model for this study. Level of Service Using the data collected for this project,ATS conducted a Level of Service(LOS)analysis at the critical intersections in the vicinity of the PT Land. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)-Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software(HCS) version 5.2. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak-hour conditions. Abelin Traffic Services 4 May,2006 • • PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana In order to assess the future traffic conditions for the area ATS assembled all of the traffic data from the four other traffic impact studies prepared for this area. Each of the other traffic impact studies project future traffic volumes at or near 2015 for the intersections adjacent to their properties, with some overlap. Each of the traffic studies projected future traffic volumes using different methods and made assumptions for background traffic growth rates to account for other developments in the area. Most of the traffic studies project only PM peak hour traffic volumes for the area since the PM peak period is usually the critical design hour for areas that are primarily commercial in nature. A review of the traffic volumes showed considerable consistency between the traffic volumes projected by the four traffic studies. Most of the adjacent intersections projected traffic volumes within 100 VPH on the main routes. Where differences in projected traffic volumes were greater than 100 VPH(mostly on North 19'h Avenue),traffic volumes were factored to the more conservative projected volume at adjacent intersections. The most conservative projected turning movement volumes were selected at each intersection. Table 1 shows the existing AM and PM 2006 LOS and Table 2 shows the projected PM 2015 LOS without the traffic from the PT Lane Development but includes the projected traffic from the other four proposed developments in this area. The LOS calculations are included in Appendix C. Table 1 - Existing 2006 Level of Service Summary AMI PM Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS North 1 9th & Baxter 11.3 B 12.8 B North 19 & Tschache 7.4 A 9.3 A North 19 & Oak Street 21.3 C 44.8 D Oak Street& 15 20.2/25.8 C/D 50.1/37.1 RE Oak Street& 14 * 24.4/22.1 C/C 35.0/36.5 D/E Oak Street& 11 * 17.9/22.9 C/C 21.0/45.1 C/E Oak Street & North 7 26.2 C 32.7 C *North bound/Southbou nd LOS. Table 1 shows that most of the intersections in the area are currently operating at acceptable levels under peak AM and PM traffic conditions. The table indicates that the PM peak hour delay is worse than the AM delay at all of the intersections. The intersection of North 19t' Avenue and Oak Street is currently functioning at LOS D during the PM peak. The unsignalized intersections along Oak Street are also showing some operational problems. • Abelin Traffic Services 5 May,2006 0 PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana • Table 2 - 2015 Level of Service Summary Without PT Land Development PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay LOS North 1 9th & Baxter 21.3 C North 1 9th & Tschache 27.0 C North 1 9th & Oak Street 51.6 D Oak Street & 15 th * 323.5/165.5 F/F Oak Street& 14 * 24.9/171.2 C/F Oak Street & 11 * 45.4/213.08 E/F Oak Street & North 7 68.7 E *Northbound/Southbound LOS. Table 2 also shows that by 2015,with the other developments in the area and the associated intersection improvements recommended with those developments, most of the signalized intersections will continue to function at acceptable levels of service or will not be degraded beyond what they are currently functioning at(19th Avenue and Oak Street at LOS D). The LOS at the intersection of Oak Street and North 7 h will fall to E by 2015 under the current configuration. The LOS at this intersection could be improved to C by adding a designated right-turn lane on the eastern leg of the intersection. The unsignalized intersections along Oak Street(11`h, 14th, and 15th)will all experience poor levels of service with the anticipated 2015 traffic volumes in this area. A review of the signalization warrants indicates that only the intersection of Oak Street and 15th Avenue will have sufficient traffic volumes to warrant signalization. The signalization warrant information is shown in Appendix D of this report. C. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development currently under consideration for the PT Land includes 14 buildable lots on 48 acres of land between 15th Avenue and I Ith Avenue zoned B-2. The proposed land uses for the site include a hotel/convention center (-200 rooms), office space, light industrial and manufacturing space,and retail space. The developers plan to connect Tschache Lane through from 19th Avenue to 11 th Avenue. Full build-out of the development is expected within the next five years. In order to be consistent with the other traffic studies for this area, ATS selected a design horizon of 2015 to project the future traffic volumes in the area. The layout of the proposed subdivision is shown in Figure 2. Abelin Traffic Services 6 May,2006 • PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana Figure 2 - Proposed Development w�, ol I IJ rfnir:mr� rnrntrnritR{rf.�� + , 1 �t` r 7 f ♦ pp e•�� 1 �^� � tl�l't_ ''•nr,�lulmrua�ult�n�i�urr111mya - ..�; �,�� t 1 � 1 '�.:; ,�f;'/ �-�� I .—"��♦ N~ ?'` a.`'^" 1 fS? -A.mu rf LAW mcru �-,",�:1 '�� _ ♦ ?';, i l+l�w /Curl_ ` '� \! �.f / /���1 fir• j 1i' K \ � ��� fi"'t^. � � \ 1�. t 1 1 t� ._ _�. +tom,��• I au nor—Cr w-- .C�4'-_. _ '`�_ _ Y•b4•YM ^�- •4-I llltl.W.lAf10 iAbelin Traffic Services 7 May,2006 PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana D. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine anticipated future traffic volumes from the proposed development. ATS used the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation(Institute of Transportation Engineers,Seventh Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle"trip"is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. Typically the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and roadways in commercial/industrial area occur during the weekday evening peak hours. At full build- out the proposed development would produce 176 AM peak hour trips,240 PM peak hour trips,and 2,813 daily trips. The trip generation rates and totals are shown in Table 3. Table 3 - Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Total AM PM Peak Total PM Hour Trip Peak Hour Trip Peak Weekday Total Ends per Hour Trip Ends per Hour Trip Trip Ends Weekday Land Use Units Unit Ends Unit Ends per Unit Trip Ends Hotel Convention 200 Center Rooms 0.56 112 0.59 118 8.17 1,634 1.4 Office Park Acres 25.65 36 28.28 40 195.11 273 20,000 Retail S.F. 1.03 21 3.75 75 42.94 859 Light 0.9 Industrial Acres 7.51 7 7.26 7 51.8 47 Total 176 240 2,813 E. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed development was based upon the existing Average Daily Traffic(ADT)volumes and the other traffic studies produced for the area. Figure 3 shows the trip distribution by roadway and the overall trip distribution characteristics. Site- generated traffic volumes are shown on figures in Appendix B.Traffic is expected to distribute 25% to/from the north on 19t' Avenue, 5% to/from the west on Baxter Lane, 5% to/from the west on Tschache Lane, 13%to/from the west on Oak Street,20%to/from the south on 19t'Avenue,2%to from the south on 15`h Avenue, 20%to/from the east on Oak Street, and 10%to/from the east on Baxter Lane. The anticipated trip distribution patterns are shown in Figure 3. F. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers,ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated LOS for 2015 conditions with the proposed development Abelin Traffic Services 8 May,2006 PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana is shown in Table 4. These calculations are based on the projected model volumes included in Appendix B of this report. Figure 3-Trip Distribution 25% 5% Baxter Lane 10% Proposed Tschache Lane Development 5% Site 19'h Avenue Oak Street 13% 15'h Avenue 20% 20% 2% Table 4- 2015 Level of Service Summary With PT Land Development PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay LOS North 19tb & Baxter 23.4 C North 19 & Tschache 34.2 C North 19 & Oak Street 54.5 D Oak Street & 15 * 783/470 F Oak Street& 14 * 32.2/385 F Oak Street & 11 * 39.9/32.5 F Oak Street & North 7 34.9** C *Northbound/Southbound LOS. **With the installation of a designated right-turn lane on the eastern leg. Abelin Traffic Services 9 May,2006 PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana 0 Table 4 indicates that all of the signalized intersections around the proposed development site will operate within acceptable limits through full buildout of the proposed PT Land development. The intersection of Oak Street and North 7�h Avenue will require the installation of a designated right- turn lane on the eastern leg of the intersection in order to function properly through 2015 regardless of the construction of the PT Land development. The intersection of 19`h Avenue and Oak Street will function at LOS D regardless of the construction of the proposed development. The unsignalized intersections along Oak Street will continue to have operational problems. However, these problems will occur regardless of the PT Land development. ATS reviewed the operations of the unsignalized intersections to determine what mitigation measures could be taken. Both 15t'and I Ith already have additional north/south lanes to improve intersection operations. The intersection at 14th Avenue does not have additional lanes, but this roadway is designated as a local route and is not intended to be utilized as a primary access and egress. The addition of extra lanes will not significantly improve the LOS at any of these three intersections. The only way to successfully improve the operations is with the installation of a traffic signal. A review of the signalization warrants indicates that only the intersection of 15`h Avenue will have sufficient traffic volumes to meet signalization warrants,as was the case without the PT Land development. If this intersection were signalized it would function at LOS B. It should also be noted that traffic from the PT Land development will account for only 27%percent to the total north/south entering traffic volume at I Ith Avenue and 14%at 15t'Avenue. Both 15`h Avenue and I Ith Avenue are designated as collector routes. These routes are spaced appropriately to create a coordinated signal system along Oak Street. If the areas along I Ith Avenue are developed and I Vh Avenue is connected to Durston Road, the route will likely become a significant north/south route, similar to what has occurred along 15th Avenue. Once that land is developed it is likely that the intersection of 11 th Avenue and Oak Street will need to be signalized. If operational problems continue at the 14i" Avenue/Oak Street intersection it would be more appropriate to restrict this intersection to right-out only movement, rather than signalizing the intersection. The grid networks north and south of Oak Street should provide good movement across Oak Street at 11ffi and 151h once these intersections are signalized. ATS reviewed the anticipated traffic volumes along Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane to determine if these roadways provide sufficient capacity under their current configuration(number of lanes). The PT Land development has six separate routes to access the area. This fact will help keep traffic volumes on any particular route low. It is anticipated that the ADT volume on Tschache west of the Lowe's entrance will be 7,000 VPD and that 2,000 VPD will use the roadway east of the Lowe's entrance. No additional lanes would be necessary for this level of traffic. Traffic volumes on Baxter Lane will increase by only 1,000 VPD with traffic from all of the proposed developments in the area. This will bring the ADT on this roadway to 5,000 VPD,which is appropriate for a two-lane road. Abelin Traffic Services 10 May,2006 0' • PT Land Development Bozeman,Montana G. IMPACT SUMMARY The PT Land development will have six separate entrances to the site. This level of connection will keep traffic volumes within the development low (500-2,000 VPD) Traffic from the proposed development will not degrade the LOS at any of the signalized intersections within the area. The unsignlized intersections along Oak Street are currently experiencing some operation problems which will be made worse by traffic from the PT Land development. Of the three unsignalized intersections along Oak Street, only the designated collector routes (II1h and 151h) would be appropriate locations for the installation of traffic signals. It is anticipated that only 15`h Avenue will have sufficient traffic volumes to meet signalization warrants by full buildout of the PT Land development. If necessary,the intersection with 14`h Avenue could be modified to a right-out only intersection. H. RECOMMENDATIONS After reviewing the traffic information,ATS has assembled the following recommendations for the PT Land Development. These recommendations include: • The developers should work with the City of Bozeman to help install a traffic signal at the intersection of 15`h Avenue and Oak Street, keeping in mind that only 14 % of the traffic entering this intersection on the north and south legs will be from the PT Land development. • Traffic conditions at the intersection of 14t'Avenue and Oak Street should be monitored. If the intersection experiences excessive delay due to left-turning vehicles or if an accident trend develops,then the intersection should be modified to a right-out only intersection on both the north and south legs. This recommendation is made regardless of the construction of the PT Land development. Abelin Traffic Services 11 May,2006 • APPENDIX A Traffic Data Abelin Traffic Services 130 South Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 rs &Trucks 40&459--1443 File Name : baxter Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 4/19/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 19th Avenue BAXTER 19th Avenue ' BAXTER Southbound i Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time I Right Thru , Left Peds Right; Thru: Left. Peds Right Thru I Left Peds Right I Thru Left I Peds ; Int.Total 11 07:15 AM i 15 166 11 01 6 5 4 0 5 93 9 01 13 9 1 0; 337 07:30 AM '. 10 205 13 0 5 6 2 0 10 111 11 0 14 5 10 01 402 07:46 AM 10 281 16 0 2 7 13 0 14 131 6 0 22 11 6 0 519 Total; 35 652 40 0 13 18 19 0 ; 29 335 26 01 49 25 17 0 1258 08:00 AM 19 235 10 0 11 10 12 01 12 110 13 0•. 11 15 13 0 j 471 08:15 AM 16 214 14 0 14 8 12 0 9 119 9 0` 27 12 7 01 461 08:30 AM; 16 204 10 01 2 6 17 1 ; 15 111 26 0; 16 6 8 01 438 -BREAK Total; 51 653 34 01 27 24 41 1 36 340 48 01 54 33 28 0. 1370 -BREAK" 04:15 PM ' 16 188 7 0 1 21 14 18 0 11 236 29 0 27 5 15 0 587 04:30 PM 1 9 208 12 0 37 16 13 0 6 233 25 0 28 13 21 0 621 04:45 PM ' 11 216 12 0 24 17 21 0 4 264 32 0 1 29 15 16 0: 661 Total: 36 612 31 0; 82 47 52 0 21 733 86 0 84 33 52 0: 1869 05:00 PM 12 201 9 01 32 17 36 0 : 7 253 20 0' 15 13 19 01 634 05:15 PM' 16 231 10 01 21 15 34 0 5 296 16 0 29 9 9 0' 691 AftM:30 PM i 7 215 13 0, 22 22 20 0 I 12 292 22 0 23 8 18 0; 674 rand Total: 157 2564 137 0€ 197 143 202 1 110 2249 218 0. 254 121 143 01 6496 Appreh% 5.5 89.7 4.8 0 36.3 26.3 37.2 0.2' 4.3 87.3 8.5 0; 49 23.4 27.6 0 Total%: 2.4 39.5 2.1 0 3 2.2 3.1 0 1.7 34.6 3.4 0 3.9 1.9 2.2 0' Unsh4W 145 2509 137 01 194 139 199 1 110 2186 210 0 251 118 137 0 6336 %Unshifted I 92.4 97.9 100 0 98.5 97.2 98.5 100 100 97.2 96.3 0 98.8 97.5 95.8 0 97.5 Bank 1 12 55 0 0 3 4 3 0, 0 63 8 01 3 3 6 0 I 160 %Bank 1 7.6 2.1 0 0 1.5 2.8 1.5 0 0 2.8 3.7 0 1.2 2.5 4.2 0, 2.5 • Abelin Traffic Services 130 South Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 Cars &Trucks 406459-1443 File Name : 15th 0 - Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 4/20/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted 15th Ave Oak Street 15th Avenue Oak Street j Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time. Right j Thru; Left: Peds; Right Thru I Left I Peds Right i Thru I Left Peds Right I Thru I Left 1 Peds' Int Total, 07:15 AM 1 0 0 1 01 0 50 18 01 11 0 6 01 13 73 0 0 172 07:30 AM 0 0 1 0. 0 57 7 0' 12 0 7 0. 9 112 1 0 206 _ 07:45 AM 1 0 1 2 01 1 95 8 01 11 0 2 01 25 174 1 0: 320 Total 0 1 4 0 1 202 33 01 34 0 15 0' 47 359 2 01 698 08:00 AM' 1 0 0 0 0 80 17 01 13 0 5 0' 24 116 0 - 0; 256 08:15 AM 2 0 0 01 0 75 15 0 10 0 9 0 35 125 3 0 274 08:30 AM i 0 -0 1 0! 1 83 11 01 13 0 10 0 6 118 1 0, 244 BREAK Total, 3 0 1 0; 1 238 43 0, 36 0 24 0: 65 359 4 0 774 BREAK 04:15 PM 1 0 1 0 2 139 8 01 15 0 16 1 1 13 137 0 0 333 04:30 PM 1 0 0 0, 1 151 11 0' 13 0 25 1 14 157 1 01 375 04:45 PM ` 0 0 1 11 1 139 13 01 9 0 12 01 19 143 3 0 341 Total 2 0 2' 1 4 429 32 01 37 0 53 2: 46 437 4 01 1049 05:00 PM' 0 0 0 01 0 211 18 0 j 16 0 16 01 16 136 0 0, 413 05:15 PM 1 0 0 0: 1 191 17 0 14 1 22 0' 14 114 1 0 376 05:30 PM i 4 0 0 0 1 1 171 11 01 16 1 16 01 11 138 1 0 370 Grand Total_ 10 1 7 1 , 8 1442 154 0 153 2 146 2 199 1543 12 0 I 36800 Apprch%; 52.6 5.3 36.8 5.31 0.5 89.9 9.6 0 i 50.5 0.7 48.2 0.7; 11.3 88 0.7 0 Total%' 0.3 0 0.2 01 0.2 39.2 4.2 0 4.2 0.1 4 0.11 5.4 41.9 0.3 0 Abelin Traffic Services 130 South Howie Street Helena, MT 59601 40&4591443 File Name . ptland5 Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 4/25/2006 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Unshifted-Bank 1 11 th Oak Street 11 th Oak Street Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time! Right Thru ; Left Peds Right Thru, Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds l Total' 06:00 AM 1 0 2 0 3 46 0 1 1 0 0 01 0 61 3 1 119 06:15 AM 3 0 3 0 3 73 0 0 0 0 1 0! 0 84 0 0 167 06:30 AM 2 0 6 01 8 80 0 1 0 0 2 10' 0 155 4 0 . 268 06:45 AM 3 0 4 0 7 117 1 2 2 1 0 3 0 152 3 1 296 Total 9 0 15 0 21 316 1 4. 3 1 3 13 0 452 10 2 850 07:00 AM ; 3 0 3 1 ( 6 93 1 1 1 0 2 01 0 118 7 1 237 07:15 AM ; 3 0 3 0 5 99 0 2 1 0 0 0' 0 136 5 0! 254 07:30 AM ; 1 0 4 0 2 86 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 114 1 01 210 _07:45 AM ; 2 0 3 0' 9 76 0 2; 1 0 0 0 0 107 2 0 i 202 Total 9 0 13 1 22 354 1 51 3 0 3 1 0 475 15 1 ; 903 BREAK"' 03:00 PM i 2 0 4 01 7 141 3 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 118 2 2 i 279 03:15 PM ( 1 0 5 1 4 154 2 4 1 0 0 0' 0 123 0 01 295 03:30 PM . 3 0 7 0; 5 132 0 1 ' 0 0 1 0 0 122 4 1 ; 276 03:45 PM! 3 0 1 0 3 163 0 0 . 1 0 0 0' 0 155 2 0 328 Total 9 0 17 1 19 590 5 5; 2 0 1 01 0 518 8 3 1178 04:00 PM ; 4 0 9 01 2 200 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 152 1 0; 371 04:15 PM i 2 0 6 1 ! 3 204 1 2 0 0 2 0 I 5 145 0 1 I 372 04:30 PM 3 0 4 0, 2 201 0 0 1 0 1 1 ! 0 143 0 0' 356 04:45PM ! 3 0 2 0; 3 161 1 14 0 0 0 0 1 141 2 0 l 315 Total, 12 0 21 1 10 766 3 3 1 0 3 1 8 581 3 1 1414 Grand Total 39 0 66 3: 72 2026 10 17 9 1 10 151 8 2026 36 7: 4345 Apprch% 36.1 0 61.1 2.8. 3.4 95.3 0.5 0.8 25.7 2.9 28.6 42.9 1 0.4 97.5 1.7 0.3 Total% 0.9 0 1.5 0.1 i 1.7 46.6 0.2 0.4' 0.2 0 0.2 0.3! 0.2 46.6 0.8 0.2 Unshifted ! 39 0 66 3 72 2026 10 17 9 1 10 15 8 2026 36 7. 4345 %Unshifted ' 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1001 100 Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 %Bank 1 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 • APPENDIX B Traffic Model PT Land Development Traffic Model 19th 2006 AM Peak 7th 61 J 1L 29 934 j 4= 31 B 34 .S #1 54 44 y t 471 76 7 tN 50 Proposed Devebpment Site 2 6 • 943 j 1 10 U 4r 2 Tschache 23 42 0 m► t 550 31 6% 90 8 15th 14th 11th 110 J % 86 3 J % 2 12 J IL 1 11 J t 26 155 .J IL 71 650 1 on 90 1 1 4m 333 0 i 4- 404 0 j 4m 389 826 S *- 112 200 U C 181 Oak 3 46 4r Si 13 4r3 18 C 2 276 4r 57 140 # �1 11 5 h 26 23 .t 0 19 S 'f 4 246 J 53 200 t 336 533 t 0 593 •* t 0 561 we t 1 152 00 t 395 13 'S 9*200 90 7 r 47 0 1 to 0 0 'Z f}s 4 118 'S 36 PT Land Development Traffic Model 19th 2006 PM Peak 7th 46 S. 99 863 l 4- 71 44 U 4r III Baxter 62 .S ft 90 45 a* t 1105 96 7 9028 Proposed Development Site 6 79 1054 j 3 41 25 Tschache 52 76 5 -0 it 1150 52 Z 90 11. 15th 14th 111h 160 4, L 179 2 #0 1L 3 20 J IL 1 12 40, 1L 10 274 1L 145 750 l 4• 242 0 i 4- 692 0 l 4- 783 0 l *- 768 608 l 4- 266 200 16 4r 306 Oak 1 1. t' 69 15 C 2 20 t 2 178 ** 112 149 25 5 1 75 10 0 3 V h 3 232 V 178 174 =0 t 900 550 mo it 1 603 - t 0 595 so it 0 193 NO It 904 7 'S M 254 63 "t tN 52 0 7 0 7 7 90 2 124 7 0105 a PT lend Development Traffic Model 19th 2015 PM Peak 7th VYdhout PT Lend 55 40 L 293 1218 l 4- 178 95 1 122 83 0 t 1595 144 7 M 40 Proposed Development Site 84 L 168 1444 a 4- 25 113 16 C 163 Tschache 184 118 16 m t 1878 148 7 r 110 15th 14th 11th 243 411 L 299 7 #1 L 9 20 J L 1 12 4/ L 10 368 40 L 207 1150 9 4- 396 Oak 1 9 4- 1012 0 a 4- 1045 0 i *- 1033 900 9 4- 319 269 46 C 399 4 to C 44 15 16 4r 2 20 0' 2 266 1166 4r 134 254 01 151 14 82 10 2 3 j 3 303 # 214 288 t 1400 811 t 1 854 t 0 859 80 t 0 232 t 1192 93 7 j*331 63 7 9053 Z do 10 7 '%� J*2 149 7 #0 126 PT Land Development Traffic Model 19th 7M 2015 PM Peak With PT Land Development 55 307 1229 j 4- 181 IIS r 139 Baxter 95 J 9 124 86 .0 t 1609 145 '% 1040 • 84 ell IL 183 1444 4• 30 125 r 177 Tschache 164 118 20 t 1878 148 'f 90 121 15th 14th 11th 246 J t 299 18 40 t 16 28 40 f. 6 15 J 1L 15 375 00 IL 208 1161 1 4. 408 oak 3 1 40 1024 2 j 4- 1054 1 1 On 1046 909 i On 325 268 16 r 411 13 16 r 44 22 r 2 27 r 2 266 r 134 256 e1 151 23 • 82 17 1 2 8 13 312 J ♦ 219 297 00 t 1409 821 ■ 3 866 00 * 1 875 t 1 240 - ■ 1198 93 Z 340 63 7 r 53 0 Z do 10 7 "S fe 2 155 7 M 126 APPENDIX C LOS Calculations HCS+: S'ialized Intersections Release*2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Baxter & 19th Agency: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: AM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Baxter Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L T R I L TR 1 Volume 134 44 76 154 31 29 154 471 50 150 934 61 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12 .0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right • Green 25.0 55.0 Yellow 3. 0 4. 0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 89.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 380 1352 0.11 0.28 23.8 C TR 483 1719 0.29 0.28 25.4 C 25.1 C Westbound L 335 1191 0. 19 0.28 24. 6 C TR 495 1762 0.14 0.28 24.1 C 24 .3 C Northbound L 241 390 0.24 0. 62 8 . 1 A T 2236 3618 0.22 0. 62 7 . 6 A 7. 6 A R 998 1615 0.05 0. 62 6.7 A Southbound L 600 971 0. 10 0. 62 7 .0 A TR 2215 3584 0. 53 0. 62 9. 9 A 9.7 A Intersection Delay = 11. 3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B 0 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 02 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Baxter & 19th cy: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman 01' riod: PM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Baxter Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L T R I L TR I Volume 162 45 96 1111 71 99 190 1105 28 144 863 46 1 Lane- Width 112. 0 12.0 112 . 0 12.0 115. 0 12.0 12. 0 115. 0 12. 0 1 RTOR- Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds Right I EB Right Right I WB Right en 25.0 55. 0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 89. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 279 994 0.26 0.28 25. 3 C TR 479 1706 0.35 0.28 25. 9, C 25.7 C Westbound L • 313 1115', , 0. 43 0.28 27. 1 C TR 487 1735 ' � 0.42 ,,.,,& 0.28 26.7 C 26. 9 C Northbound L 321 519 0.30 0. 62 8.5 A T 2236 3618 0.53 0. 62 9.9 A 9.7 A R 998 1615 - 0.03 0. 62 6. 6 A Southbound L 239 387' - 0.20 0. 62 7 .8 A TR 2219 3590 0. 44 0. 62 9. 1 A 9.0 A • Intersection Delay = 12. 8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS+: Slialized Intersections Release 2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Tschache & 19th Agency: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: AM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Tschache Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I LTR I L TR I L TR I Volume 123 0 31 12 1 6 142 550 8 I10 943 2 1 Lane Width I 12.0 1 12.0 115.0 12.0 115.0 12 .0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A i SB Left A Thru A l Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 20.0 60. 0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 89. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 355 1580 0.19 0.22 28.2 C 28.2 C Westbound LTR 376 1672 0.03 0.22 26. 9 C 26. 9 C Northbound L 309 458 0. 14 0. 67 5. 4 A TR 2434 3610 0.24 0.67 5.7 A 5.7 A Southbound L 597 886 0.02 0.67 4.8 A TR 2438 3617 0. 46 0. 67 7. 0 A 6. 9 A Intersection Delay = 7.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 102 A alyst: RLA Inter. : Tschache & 19th cy: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Tschache Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR I LTR I L TR I L TR .- Volume 152 5 52 125 3 79 176 1150 11 141 1054 8 I Lane Width 1 15.0 1 15.0 115.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 I RTOR `Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds 'PRight 1 EB Right Right I WB Right reen 20.0 60.0 Yellow 3. 0 4. 0 All Red 1.0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 89. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 364 1618 0.35 0.22 29.6 C 29. 6 C Westbound LTR 388 1726 0. 34 0.22 29. 4 C 29. 4 C Northbound L 286 424 0.29 0. 67 6. 4 A TR 2435 3612 0.51 0. 67 7 .4 A 7 .3 A Southbound L 254 377 0. 18 0. 67 5.7 A TR 2436 3613-;._ 0. 48 0. 67 7 . 1 A 7. 1 A 0 Intersection Delay = 9.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS+: Slialized Intersections ReleaseO 2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak Street & 19th Agency: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: AM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LT R I L T R I L TR I L TR 1 .Volume 1140 200 13 186 90 181 Ill 336 200 1200 650 110 1 .Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12 .0 115.0 12.0 115.0 12. 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 35.0 7 .0 35.0 Yellow 3. 0 3.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 0.0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 89. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 614 . 1562 0.71 0.39 26.5 C 26.1 C R 635 ':. 1615 0.03 0.39 16.6 B Westbound - ' L 261 663 0.35 0.39 19.8 B T 747 1900 0. 13 0.39 17 .3 B 18.7 B R 635 1615 0.31 0.39 18. 9 B Northbound L 298 1986 0.04 0.51 13.1 B TR 1343 3415 0.42 0.39 19.8 B 19.7 B Southbound L 442 1986 0.53 0.51 14.4 B TR 1392 3539 0. 64 0.39 22. 9 C 21.2 C Intersection Delay = 21. 3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C - • • HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 02 alyst: RLA Inter. : Oak Street & 19th cy: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes I 0 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig I LT R I L T R I L TR I L TR I Volume 1149 174 7 1306 242 179 125 900 254 1200 750 160 1 Lane Width 1 12 .0 12 .0 115. 0 12.0 12 . 0 115. 0 12.0 115.0 12 . 0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 E 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds Right 1 EB Right Right I WB Right reen 35. 0 7. 0 35. 0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 4. 0 All Red 1 . 0 0.0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 89. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 433 1100 0. 91 0. 39 48. 5 D 47 .9 D R 635 1615 0. 01 0. 39 16. 5 B Westbound L 297 755 1.26 0.39 166.7 F T 747 1900 0. 39 0.39 19.7 B 81.5 F R 635 1615 0.34 0. 39 19. 3 B Northbound L 262 1986 0. 10 0.51 14. 1 B TR 1376 3498 ' 0. 90 0.39 33. 9 C 33.5 C Southbound L 250 1986 0. 88 0. 51 47. 0 D TR 1385 3522 0.72 0.39 24.8 C 28 .8 C 0 Intersection Delay = 44.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release4P2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak & N7th Agency: Abelin Traffic Services Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: AM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 7th SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 i 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 -LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R I Volume 1246 152 118 157 112 71 153 395 36 1276 826 155 1 Lane Width 115. 0 12. 0 12. 0 115. 0 15. 0 115. 0 12. 0 12. 0 115. 0 12. 0 12. 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 10. 0 25. 0 11. 0 30.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0. 0 1. 0 0. 0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 501 1986 0.56 0.42 19.5 B T 528 1900 0. 33 0.28 26.2 C 23. 0 C R 449 1615. 0.30 0.28 26.0 C Westbound L 536 1986 . 0.12 0.42 15. 9 B TR 547 1968 0.39 0.28 26.8 C 24.2 C Northbound L 336 1986 0. 17 0. 49 16.3 B T 1206 3618 0.36 0.33 22.9 C 22 . 0 C R 538 1615 0. 07 0. 33 20. 6 C Southbound L 528 1986 0. 65 0.49 17.7 B T 1206 3618 0.86 0.33 34.2 C 29.2 C R 538 1615 0.36 0.33 23.1 C Intersection Delay = 26.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5:2 lyst: RLA Inter. : Oak & N7th cy: Abelin Traffic Services Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 7th SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R Volume 1232 193 124 1112 266 145 1178 904 105 1178 608 274 1 Lane Width 115.0 12.0 12.0 115. 0 15.0 115. 0 12.0 12 . 0 115.0 12 .0 12 . 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds f Right 1 EB Right Right I WB Right en 10. 0 30. 0 8. 0 28. 0 Yellow 3. 0 3.0 3.0 3. 0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0. 0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 321 1986 0.85 0. 48 37.7 D T 633 1900 0.36 0.33 23.1 C 29.1 C R 538 1615 0.27 0.33 22 .3 - C Westbound L 570 1986 0.25 0. 48 13. 9 B TR 660 1979 0.78 0.33 32. 9 C 28. 8 C Northbound L 325 1986 0. 64 0.43 22. 1 C T 1126 3618 0. 94 0.31 45.7 D 40.2 D R 502 1615 0.25 0.31 23.4 C Southbound L 270 1986 0.73 0.43 30. 9 C T 1126 3618 0.59 0.31 27 . 0 C 28.0 C 502 1615 0. 60 0.31 28.2 C Intersection Delay = 32.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: UnOgnalized Intersections Releas05.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services 0 Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 15th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 15th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments__ Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 5 553 90 51 333 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 699 113 54 358 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 26 0 47 3 1 3 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.58 0.58 0.58 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 0 59 5 1 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L ► L TR L TR v (vph) 6 54 32 59 5 6 C (m) (vph) 1210 823 188 387 103 480 v/c 0.00 0.07 0.17 0.15 0.05 0. 01 95% queue length 0.01 0.21 0. 60 0.53 0.15 0. 04 Control Delay 8 . 0 9.7 28. 0 16.0 41.7 12. 6 LOS A A D C E B Approach Delay 20.2 25.8 Approach LOS C D • HCS+: Unsig nalized Intersections Releasef2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Wyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 15th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 15th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 5 550 63 59 692 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.82 0.82 0. 82 Hourly ,Flow Rate, HFR 5 611 70 71 843 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR &t77 Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 75 1 52 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0. 83 0.83 0.83 0.50 0.50 0.50 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 90 1 62 2 2 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 5 71 90 63 2 6 C(m) (vph) 800 921 134 418 51 203 v/c 0. 01 0. 08 0. 67 0. 15 0. 04 0. 03 95% queue length 0. 02 0.25 3. 68 0.53 0.12 0. 09 Control Delay 9.5 9.2 74.5 15. 1 78 .5 23.3 OS A A F C F C proach Delay 50.1 37 .1 proach LOS F E HCS+: UnQgnalized Intersections Relea 05.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 14th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 14th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 23 583 0 3 404 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 92 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 24 633 0 3 486 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 1 0 13 0 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.87 0.87 0. 87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2 0 14 0 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 24 3 2 27 C(m) (vph) 1086 960 188 238 v/c 0.02 0.00 0.01 0. 11 95% queue length 0.07 0. 01 0. 03 0.38 Control Delay 8.4 8 . 8 24.4 22. 1 LOS A A C C Approach Delay . 24. 4 22.1 Approach LOS C C HCS+: Uns•alized Intersections Release*2 g TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY plyst: RLA nvy/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 14th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 14th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 603 0 2 783 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 96 0. 96 0. 96 0. 93 0. 93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 628 0 2 841 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR tream Signal? No No P.11nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 1 0 15 0 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0. 50 0.50 0.50 0. 63 0. 63 0. 63 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2 0 23 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 10 2 2 54 C(m) (vph) 802 964 122 167 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.32 95% queue length 0.04 0. 01 0.05 1.31 Control Delay 9.5 8.7 35.0- 36. 5 LOS A A D E eproach Delay 35.0- 36. 5 proach LOS D E HCS+: Unonalized Intersections Releas*.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: AM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & llth Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: llth Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 19 561 0 2 389 26 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 92 0. 92 0.92 0.83 0.83 0.83 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 609 0 2 468 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound • Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 4 1 4 16 0 11 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0. 65 0.65 0. 65 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 1 6 18 0 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LT R v (vph) 20 2 13 18 12 C(m) (vph) 1075 979 293 153 756 v/c 0. 02 0. 00 0. 04 0. 12 0. 02 95% queue length 0.06 0.01 0. 14 0.39 0.05 Control Delay 8 .4 8.7 17. 9 31. 6 9.8 LOS A A C D A Approach Delay 17. 9 22. 9 Approach LOS C C HCS+: Unsi•lized Intersections Release*2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY yst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & llth Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2006 Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: llth Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 3 595 7 2 768 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 96 0. 96 0. 96 0. 93 0. 93 0. 93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 619 7 2 825 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR tream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 0 2 20 0 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.50 0. 64 0. 64 0. 64 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 4 31 0 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 LTR I LT R v (vph) 3 2 10 31 18 C (m) (vph) 807 965 235 90 589 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.34 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.13 1.33 0.09 Control Delay 9. 5 8.7 21.0 64.7 11. 3 4iproach S A A C F B proach Delay 21.0 45.1 LOS C E HCS+: Salized Intersections Release 2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Baxter & 19th Agency: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Baxter Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I i No. Lanes 1 1 1 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L TR I Volume 195 83 144 1139 178 293 1122 1595 40 1104 1218 55 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12 . 0 112. 0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12. 0 12.0 115.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 . 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 25.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 All Red 1. 0 1.0 Cycle Length: 89. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS . Delay LOS Eastbound L 271 966' 0.41 0.28 27. 1 C T 534 1900 0. 18 0.28 24 .4 C 26.0 C R 454 1615 0.37 0.28 26.2 C Westbound L 370 1318 0.45 0.28 27 .2 C T 534 1900 0.40 0.28 26.4 C 32. 1 C R 454 1615 0.78 0.28 37.8 D Northbound L 174 282 0.75 0.62 28 .3 C T 2236 3618 0.76 0.62 13. 8 B 14. 6 B R 998 1615 0. 04 0. 62 6.7 A Southbound L 94 152 1.19 0. 62 170.2 F TR 2221 3594 0. 62 0. 62 11.0 B 23.0 C Intersection Delay = 21.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C • HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release f g 2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Tschache & 19th Pr ncy: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman iod: PM Peak Hour Year : 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Tschache Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 I LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L T R I L TR I Volume 1164 16 148 1163 25 168 1118 1878 110 1113 1444 84 1 Lane Width 112. 0 15.0 112 .0 15.0 115. 0 12 .0 12.0 115. 0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds ORight I EB Right Right 1 WB Right een 21 .0 60.0 Yellow 3. 0 4.0 All Red 1. 0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90. 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 189� 811 1.00 0.23 100.0 F TR ,'422 1807 0.45 0.23 30.3 C 65.2 E Westbound L 229 980 0. 87 0.23 61.3 E TR 424 1817 0 .55 0.23 32 .0 C 45.4 D Northbound L 122 183 1. 04 0. 67 107 . 9 F T 2412 3618 0. 84 0. 67 14. 1 B 18. 9 B R 1077 1615 0. 11 0. 67 5.4 A Southbound L 93 139 1.33 0.67 221.3 F TR 2392 3588 0.70 0. 67 10.3 B 24.8 C 0 Intersection Delay = 27 .0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: salized Intersections Release9.2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak Street & 19th Agency: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street NIS St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY i Eastbound ( Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1254 288 93 1399 396 299 1151 1400 331 1269 1150 243 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12. 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A Right A ( Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right • Green 8. 9 27 .3 7 .0 41.8 Yellow 3. 0 3.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0.0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 237 1805 1.22 0.39 160.4 F T 745 1900 0.44 0.39 22.7 C 78.7 E R 441 1615 0.24 0.27 28. 6 C Westbound L 374 953 1.21 0. 39 147.8 F T 519 1900 0. 87 0.27 49.1 D 83. 0 F R 441 1615 0.77 0.27 41.7 D Northbound L 223 1986 0.73 0.52 31.2 C T 1512 3618 1.00 0. 42 51.0 D 44.4 D R 675 1615 0.53 0.42 22 .5 C Southbound L 1290 3856 0.23 0. 52 21. 1 C T 1512 3618 0.84 0.42 30.3 C 27.4 C R 675 1615 0.40 0.42 20.7 C Intersection Delay = 51. 6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D • • HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release f2 3 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak & N7th ncy: Abelin Traffic Services Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman riod: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 7th SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L T R I L T R Volume 1303 232 149 1134 319 207 1214 1192 126 1266 900 368 I Lane Width 115.0 12.0 12.0 115. 0 12 . 0 115. 0 12.0 12. 0 115.0 12. 0 12 . 0 I 'RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds Right ( EB Right Right I WB Right een 9.2 16.2 8:7 31. 9 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3. 0 3. 0 All Red 0. 0 1.0 0. 0 1.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound . L 332 1986 1. 02 0.36 75. 9 E T 385 1900 0. 67 0.20 33. 9 C 51. 6 D R ,32.7,,-- 1615 0.51 0.20 29.7 C Westbound' ` L 361 1986 . 0.42 0.36 19.6 B TR 362 '.. 1788 1. 65 0.20 337.4 F 273. 0 F Northbound L 333 1986 0.70 0.55 19.6 B T 1443 3618 0. 90 0.40 30.4 C 27 .7 C R 644 1615 0.21 0.40 16.0 B Southbound L 321 1986 0. 91 0. 55 48.2 D T 1443 3618 0. 69 0.40 21.3 C 25. 9 C R 644 1615 0. 63 0.40 21.2 C • Intersection Delay = 68 .7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E HCS+: UnOg nalized Intersections Relea 95.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 15th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 15th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 14 811 63 44 1012 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 90 0. 90 0.90 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 901 70 53 1234 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 82 1 53 4 1 7 Peak Hour Factor; .PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.50 0.50 0.50 Hourly Flow Rate, -HER 98 1 63 8 2 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR 1 L TR v (vph) 15 53 98 64 8 16 C(m) (vph) 567 718 56 257 14 172 v/c 0.03 0.07 1.75 0.25 0. 57 0. 09 95% queue length 0.08 0.24 9.23 0. 96 1. 40 0.30 Control Delay 11.5 10.4 519.3 23. 6 440.3 28.1 LOS B B F C F D Approach Delay 323.5 165.5 • Approach LOS F F 0 HCS+: Uns alized Intersections Release 2 g TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY pen lyst: RLA cy/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 14th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 14th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 10 854 1 2 1045 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.96 0. 96 0. 96 0.93 0. 93 0. 93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 889 1 2 1123 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR Ceam Signal? No No tr or Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 2 0 10 15 0 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0 .50 0.50 0.63 0.63 0 . 63 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 20 23 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR 1 LTR v (vph) 10 2 24 54 C(m) (vph) 629 770 205 65 v/c 0.02 0.00 0. 12 0. 83 95% queue length 0. 05 0. 01 0. 39 3. 86 Control Delay 10.8 9.7 24.9 171.2 LOS B A C F *roach Delay 24. 9 171.2 roach LOS C F HCS+: UnOgnalized Intersections Releas#5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & llth Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 Without PT Land Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: llth Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 3 859 7 2 1033 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 96 0. 96 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR . 3 894 7 2 1110 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 1 2 20 1 12 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.50 0. 64 0. 64 0. 64 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 2 4 31 1 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L 1 LTR 1 LT R v (vph) 3 2 12 32 18 C (m) (vph) 631 763 101 33 477 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.97 0.04 95% queue length 0..01 0.01 0.39 3.40 0.12 Control Delay 10.7 9.7 45.4 325. 6 12.8 LOS B A E F B Approach Delay 45.4 213.0 • Approach LOS E F 0 HCS+: signalized Intersections Release 5:2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Baxter & 19th *cy: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Baxter Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L TR 1 ' Volume 195 86 145 1139 181 307 1124 1609 40 1115 1229 55 1 Lane._Width 112.0 12.0 12 .0 112. 0 12.0 12 .0 115.0 12.0 12 . 0 115.0 12. 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds Right I EB Right Right 1 WB Right en 25.0 55. 0 Yellow 3.0 4. 0 All Red 1.0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 89.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 268 954 0.42 0.28 27. 1 C T 534 1900 0. 19 0.28 24.5 C 26.0 C R 454 1615 0.38 0.28 26.3 C Westbound L 369 1314 0.45 0.28 27 .2 C T 534 1900 0.41 0.28 26.5 C 33.7 C R 454 1615 0.81 0.28 40.8 D Northbound L 171 276 0.77 0. 62 31.7 C T 2236 3618 0.77 0. 62 14.0 B 15. 0 B R 998 1615 0.04 0. 62 6.7 A Southbound L 94 ­ 152 1.32 0. 62 217.4 F TR 2221 3594 0.-62 0. 62 11.1 B 28. 1 C 0 Intersection Delay = 23. 4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: Qnalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Tschache & 19th Agency: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Tschache Lane N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1. 0 I 1 2 1 I 1 2 0 I .LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L T R I L TR I Volume 1164 20 148 1177 30 183 1118 1878 121 1125 1444 84 1 Lane Width 112.0 15.0 112.0 15.0 115.0 12.0 12. 0 115.0 12.0 1 RTOR 'Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right • Green 23.0 5. 0 49.0 Yellow 3.0 3. 0 4 . 0 All Red 1.0 0. 0 1.0 Cycle Length: 89.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 203 784 0. 93 0.26 76.3 E TR 469 1814 0.41 0.26 28.0 C 51. 9 D Westbound' L ,259, 1002' 0.83 0.26 51.5 D TR 471• 1821 0.55 0.26 30.0 C 39.7 D Northbound L 206 1986 0. 62 0. 64 22.1 C T 1992 3618 1.01 0.55 43. 6 D 40.5 D R 889 1615 0.15 0.55 9.9 A Southbound _ L 206 1986 0.67 0. 64 27.9 C TR 1975 3588 0.85 0.55 20. 6 C 21.2 C Intersection Delay = 34.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C • .0 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak Street & 19th ncy: Abelin Traffic Servies Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman eriod: PM Peak Hour Year : 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 19th Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 1256 297 93 1411 408 299 1151 1409 340 1269 1161 246 1 Lane Width 112 .0 12 .0 12 .0 115 .0 12 .0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12.0 115 .0 12 .0 12 .0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds ( Peds WB Left A A 1 SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds ORight 1 EB Right Right 1 WB Right een 8. 9 27.3 7.0 41. 8 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 4. 0 All Red 0.0 1.0 0. 0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 237 1805 1.23 0.39 163.2 F T 745 1900 0.45 0.39 22 . 9 C 79. 3 E R 441 1615 0.24 0.27 28 . 6 C Westbound L 357 910 1.28 0.39 176.4 F . T 519 1900 0. 87 0.27 49. 8 D 93. 9 F R 441 1615 0.75 0.27 40. 4 D Northbound L 223 1986 0.73 0. 52 31.3 C T 1512 3618 1. 00 0.42 52.7 D 45.7 D R 675 1615 0.54 0.42 22 .8 C Southbound L 1290 3856 0.23 0.52 21. 1 C T 1512 3618 0.84 0.42 30.7 C 27.7 C R 675 1615 0.40 0.42 20.7 C Intersection Delay = 54.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS+: 11walized Intersections Releas*2 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak & N7th Agency: Abelin Traffic Services Area Type: All other areas Date: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman • Period: PM Peak Hour Year 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 7th SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 I LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1312 240 155 1134 325 208 1219 1198 126 1268 909 375 1 Lane .Width 115. 0 12. 0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12.0 12.0 115.0 12 . 0 12. 0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A i Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 9.2 16.2 8.7 31. 0 Yellow 3. 0 3. 0 3. 0 3.0 All Red 0.0 1. 0 0. 0 1.0 Cycle Length: 79. 1 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 337 1986 1.03 0.36 80.7 F T 389 1900 0. 69 0.20 34. 1 C 53.7 D R 331 1615 0.52 0.20 29.5 C Westbound L 361 1986 0.42 0.36 19. 3 B T 389 1900 0. 95 0.20 63. 6 E 46.2 D R 331 1615 0.71 0.20 36.4 D Northbound L 326 1986 0.73 0.54 21.7 C T 1418 3618 0. 92 0.39 32 .7 C 29. 8 C R 633 1615 0.22 0.39 16.2 B Southbound L 324 1986 0.91 0.54 47.9 D T 1418 3618 0.70 0.39 21.8 C 26.4 C R 633 1615 0.65 0.39 22.0 C Intersection Delay = 34.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C • 0 HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 02 Analyst: RLA Inter. : Oak & N15th ncy: Abelin Traffic Services Area Type: All other areas e: 5/11/2006 Jurisd: Bozeman iod: PM Peak Hour Year : 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development E/W St: Oak Street N/S St: North 15th SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I No. Lanes I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0. I 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L T R I L TR I L TR I L TR I Volume 123 821 63 144 1024 16 182 3 53 - 113 3 18 1 Lane Width 115. 0 12. 0 12. 0 115.0 12 . 0 115.0 12.0 115.0 12. 0 1 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds 0 Right I EB Right Right I WB Right en 45.0 15.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 68 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 123 186 0.21 0. 66 5.4 A T 1257 1900 0.73 0. 66 9. 6 A 9. 1 A R 1069 1615 0.07 0. 66 4. 1 A Westbound L 255 386 0.20 0. 66 4.8 A TR 1255 1896 0. 94 0. 66 24. 1 C 23. 4 C Northbound L 341 1547 0.30 0.22 22. 6 C TR 360 1631 0. 19 0.22 21. 8 C 22.3 C Southbound L 328 1487 0. 05 ' - 0.22 20. 9 C TR 366 1659 0.07 ' 0.22 21. 1 C 21.0 C • Intersection Delay = 17.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS+: U10gnalized Intersections Relea05.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 15th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 15th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 23 821 63 44 1024 16 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 90 0. 90 0. 90 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 912 70 53 1248 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 2 0 Configuration L T R L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound • Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 82 3 53 13 3 18 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.83 0. 83 0.83 0.50 0.50 0.50 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 98 3 63 26 6 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I L TR I L TR v (vph) 25 53 98 66 26 42 C (m) (vph) 555 711 43 209 12 148 v/c 0.05 0.07 2.28 0.32 2. 17 0.28 95% queue length 0.14 0.24 10.41 1 .29 4 .12 1 .10 Control Delay 11.8 10.5 787.2 30.0 1169 38.7 LOS B B F D F E Approach Delay 482.5 470. 7 Approach LOS F F 0 HCS+: Uns alized Intersections Releas*2 g TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lyst: RLA ency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & 14th Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: 14th Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 17 866 1 2 1054 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 96 0. 96 0.96 0. 93 0. 93 0. 93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 902 1 2 1133 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR tream Signal? No No or Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 2 1 10 22 2 28 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.63 0.63 0 . 63 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 2 20 34 3 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 17 2 26 81 C (m) (vph) 621 761 158 57 v/c 0.03 0.00 0. 16 1.42 95% queue length 0.08 0 .01 0.57 7.21 Control Delay 11.0 9.7 32.2 385. 1 LOS B A D F roach Delay 32.2 385. 1 roach LOS D F HCS+: U169nalized Intersections Relea.95.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: RLA Agency/Co. : Abelin Traffic Services Date Performed: 5/11/2006 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: Oak & llth Jurisdiction: Bozeman Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2015 With PT Land Development Project ID: PT Land Development East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: llth Avenue Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 6 875 7 2 1046 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0. 96 0. 96 0.96 0. 93 0. 93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 911 7 2 1124 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 0 1 2 0 Configuration L TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 3 0 2 27 1 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.50 0.50 0.50 0. 64 0. 64 0. 64 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 0 4 42 1 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LTR LT R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LT R v (vph) 6 2 10 43 23 C(m) (vph) 620 752 113 31 470 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.09 1.39 0. 05 95% queue length 0.03 0.01 0.28 4.84 0. 15 Control Delay 10. 9 9.8 39. 9 491.2 13. 1 LOS B A E F B Approach Delay 39. 9 324. 6 Approach LOS E F APPENDIX D Signalization Warrants 0 2003 Edition Page 4C-7 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3,Peak Hour s 600 a = 500 U 2 01 MORI LAN S&2 OR MORE rNES w 400 a 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE OQ W 300 1 LANE&1 LANE zD J 200 O '150 w 100 -100 x 0 x 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note:ISO vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 09 K 7ka ed f IS14 AVG, Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3,Peak Hour(70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h OR ABOVE 40 mph ON MAJOR STREET) x o. x 400 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES W 0L 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE x 0- 300 Q 1 LANE&1 LANE w ZX. 200 _ Pri zw, 4 OR W 100 '100 x '75 C7 2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note:100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. November 2003 Sect.4C.06 Y - .. . . ._ -.� _ ,. • , D ,. � a m _a • X � _ f j 7 ,� �� r: !� � is `� i! 1 I., � �, .` .� r I +., i�'. i E. oy 4 -� • j i � 1 1 it. � j H i 15 �r I; !iy� �h ' i s '� 7 ,i 7 ;,• n :.. .. . _. . .�,,._ --`= ,ai r� mr�Wim x- .. �- - 1Yr0io'f"l�lrlfuf '°11�' �.n... ., �.� -&;,Ras:, ..:. �,.. r.��_� :d i �2 �� ��� ���� �. • fl.. :: �, • • • • • Covenants • DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS PT LAND SUBDIVISION, BOZEMAN, MONTANA TABLE OF CONTENTS RECITALS ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS 1.01 Assessment Lien.......................................................................................... 1.02 Association................................................................................................... 1.03 City............................................................................................................... 1.04 Commercial PUD ......................................................................................... 1.05 Common Area Improvements ...................................................................... 1.06 Common Area Maintenance Costs .............................................................. 1.07 Common Areas............................................................................................ 1.08 Default Rate................................................................................................. 1.09 Developer..................................................................................................... 1.10 Environmental Laws..................................................................................... 1.11 Hazardous Material ..................................................................................... 1.12 Lot................................................................................................................ 1.13 Mortgage and Mortgagee............................................................................. 1.14 Noxious Weeds............................................................................................ 1.15 Occupant...................................................................................................... 1.16 Owner .......................................................................................................... 1.17 Person ......................................................................................................... 1.18 Plat............................................................................................................... 1.19 Property ...................................................................................................... 1.20 Rules and Regulations ................................................................................ 1.21 Site Plan....................................................................................................... ARTICLE II - OWNERS'S ASSOCIATION 2.01 Formation of the Association........................................................................ 2.02 Purposes of the Association......................................................................... 2.03 Membership in the Association .................................................................... 2.04 Voting rights of Owners................................................................................ 2.05 Ownership and use of Common Areas ........................................................ ARTICLE III - CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS 3.01 Streets and Utilities...................................................................................... 3.02 General Construction Requirements............................................................ 3.03 General Construction Indemnity................................................................... • 3.04 Construction Along Common Boundary Line............................................... 3.05 Signs............................................................................................................ ARTICLE IV- COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 1 • 0 4.01 General Restrictions..................................................................................... 4.02 Amended Plat and Site Plan ........................................................................ 4.03 Parking Standards......................................................................................... 4.04 Grading ........................................................................................................ ARTICLE V— USE RESTRICTIONS 5.01 Use in General ............................................................................................. 5.02 Generally Prohibited Uses ........................................................................... 5.03 Rules and Regulations................................................................................. 5.04 Additional Use Restrictions and Requirements............................................ ARTICLE VI — MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 6.01 Common Area Maintenance Obligation ....................................................... 6.02 Restoration of Common Area Improvements............................................... 6.03 Common Area Maintenance Costs .............................................................. 6.04 Payment of Common Area Maintenance Costs........................................... 6.05 Building Improvements..................................:.............................................. 6.06 Control of Noxious Weeds ........................................................................... ARTICLE VII - ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS 7.01 Duties of Owners.......................................................................................... 7.02 Specific Construction Materials.................................................................... 7.03 Permitted Use, Storage, Handling and Disposal of Hazardous Materials.... ARTICLE VIII —ASSESSMENT LIENS 8.01 Assessment Lien............................................:............................................. 8.02 Assessments as Personal Obligations......................................................... 8.03 Superiority of Assessment Lien.................................................................... 8.04 Release of Assessment Lien........................................................................ 8.05 Litigation of Assessment Lien ...................................................................... 8.05 Certificate regarding payment of Assessments............................................ 8.06 Assessment liens which may be imposed by the City.................................. ARTICLE IX - AMENDMENT 9:01 Amendment of this Declaration.................................................................... 9.01 ' Consent of the City required for certain amendments.................................. ARTICLE X - MISCELLANEOUS 10.01 Binding Effect................................................................................................ • 1b.02 Breach Shall Not Permit Termination........................................................... PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 2 0 • 10.03 Enforcement of this Declaration................................................................... 10.04 Breach - Effect on Mortgagee and Right to Cure......................................... 10.05 Effect on Third Parties.................................................................................. 10.06 No Partnership ............................................................................................. 10.07 Modification.................................................................................................. 10.08 Severability................................................................................................... 10.19 Governing Law.............................................................................................. 10.10 Terminology; Captions ................................................................................. 10.11 Counterparts ................................................................................................ 10.12 Consent........................................................................................................ 10.13 Estoppel Certificate...................................................................................... 10.14 Not a Public Dedication................................................................................ 10.15 Release........................................................................................................ 10.16 Eminent Domain.....:..................................................................................... 10.17 Time of Essence .......................................................................................... 10.18 Excuse for Nonperformance ........................................................................ 10.19 Duration ....................................................................................................... 10.21 Waiver of Default.......................................................................................... 10.22 Common Ownership .................................................................................... SIGNATURE OF PT LAND EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property EXHIBIT "B" Plat EXHIBIT "C" Site Plan EXHIBIT "D" Design Guidelines EXHIBIT "E" Sign Guidelines EXHIBIT "F" Rules and Regulations PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 3 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS PT LAND SUBDIVISION, BOZEMAN, MONTANA THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS(the"Declaration") is made on , 2006, by PT Land, a Montana general partnership(referred to in this Declaration as "Developer"). RECITALS A. All capitalized terms are defined in these Recitals or Article I below and, except as otherwise noted, each definition applies where appropriate to the context, to the noun (singular and plural), adjective and verb forms of the defined term. References to "Articles" and "Exhibits" are to the corresponding parts of this Declaration. B. Developer is the owner of the real property located in the City of Bozeman, County of Gallatin, State of Montana, described in Exhibit "A" which is attached to this Declaration (the "Property") and shown on the subdivision plat which is attached to this Declaration as Exhibit B (the "Plat"). C. Developer desires to develop and operate the Property as a commercial planned unit development (the "Commercial PUD") and, therefore, wishes to establish certain easements, covenants and restrictions on the Property and/or portions of the Property. D. In connection with the development of the Commercial PUD or thereafter, • Developer may further subdivide, sell, convey, lease or hypothecate all or portions of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition that forthe optimum development and operation of the Commercial PUD as an integrated project, it is necessary that Developer establish certain covenants running with the land respecting certain matters, including but not limited to matters relating to the construction and maintenance of facilities on, and the use and restrictions on the use of, the Property. Developer declares that all Persons who acquire or occupy portions of the Property shall take subject to this Declaration in order that all development on the Property and the operation of the Commercial PUD will be in conformity with this Declaration. Notwithstanding a conflict between the terms of this Declaration and the provisions of a particular agreement such as a tenant lease or other occupancy agreement between a Owner and its Occupant, (i) as among the Owners and their respective successors and assigns, this Declaration shall control over such an agreement, and (ii)all Occupants shall be bound by the terms of Articles I, III, IV, V, VI VII, and X of this Declaration and the Rules and Regulations attached to this Declaration. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.01 Assessment Lien. "Assessment Lien" is a lien placed on a defaulting Lot for sums owed to the Association under the provisions of this Declaration. PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 4 • 1.02 Association. "Association" means PT Land Subdivision Owners'Association, Inc., a Montana non-profit corporation, which has been formed in connection with this Declaration. 1.03 City. "City" means the City of Bozeman, Montana. 1.04 Commercial PUD. "Commercial PUD" shall mean the retail or commercial development and related Common Areas on the Property. 1.05 Common Area Improvements. "Common Area Improvements"are the trails and other improvements depicted on the Site Plan as within the Common Areas, and any landscaped areas within the Common Areas; 1.06 Common Area Maintenance Costs. "Common Area Maintenance Costs" are all expenditures, costs, premiums and expenses incurred by the Association during any given accounting period for maintenance, lighting and security, repair, or replacement of the Common Areas and the improvements in the Common Areas, including, but not limited to, those items listed in Section 6.03. 1.07 Common Areas. "Common Areas" means(a) Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space, and (b) the green space areas along Oak Street and Baxter Lane which consist of the southerly 50 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, of the Plat, and the northerly 50 feet of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, of the Plat. 1.08 Default Rate. Default Rate is the greater of fifteen percent or a rate equal to six percent(6%) in excess of the base rate on corporate loans posted by at least seventy- five percent of the nation's thirty largest Banks, as published by the Wall Street Journal. 1.09 Developer. "Developer" means PT Land, or any person to whom the rights and responsibilities of the Developer under this Declaration are assigned by PT Land or its successors and assigns. 1.10 Environmental Laws. "Environmental Laws" are all present and future federal, state or local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, decisions and other requirements of governmental authorities relating to the environment or to any Hazardous Material, including the following federal laws, as they may have been amended from time to time: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act,the Clean Water Act,the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, equivalent Montana statutes, and regulations adopted, published and/or promulgated pursuant to those laws. 1.11 Hazardous Material. "Hazardous Material"means materials and substances defined as "hazardous substances," "hazardous materials," "hazardous waste," "toxic substances," including asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum (or petroleum fuel products), hydrocarbonic substances, and constituents of any of the foregoing, or other similar designations under any Environmental Laws or any regulations promulgated PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 5 0 • thereunder; and further, any substance or material which because of toxicity, corrosivity, reactivity, ignitability, carcinogenicity, magnification or concentration within biologic chains presents a demonstrated threat to biologic processes when discharged into the environment 1.12 Lot. A "Lot' is any of the numbered lots which comprise the Property, as shown on the original Plat or any amended Plat, with the exception of any parcel or tract which is part of the Common Areas. 1.13 Mortgage and Mortgagee: The term "Mortgage" means (a) any mortgage, trust indenture, deed of trust, or contract for deed on the interest,whetherfee or leasehold, of a Owner in a Lot and, to the extent applicable, a "sale and leaseback" or "assignment and subleaseback"transaction entered into for financing purposes. "Mortgagee"shall mean a mortgagee under a mortgage, the trustee and the beneficiary under a trust indenture or deed of trust, or the seller under a contract for deed, and to the extent applicable, a fee owner or lessor or sublessor of any Lot which is the subject of a lease under which any Owner becomes a lessee in a so-called "sale and leaseback" or "assignment and subleaseback" transaction entered into for financing purposes. 1.14 Noxious Weeds. "Noxious Weeds" means any plant designated as a noxious weed by the State of Montana or Gallatin County. 1.15 Occupant. "Occupant' shall mean any Person from time to time entitled to the use and occupancy of any Parcel under an ownership right or any lease, sublease, license, concession or other similar agreement, and the officers, directors, employees, agents, contractors, customers, vendors, suppliers, visitors, invitees, licensees and concessionaires of any such Person insofar as their activities relate to the intended use of the Property. 1.16 Owner. "Owner" is the Person who owns the fee interest in a Lot, either individually or as a co-owner in any real estate tenancy relationship recognized under the laws of the state of Montana. The term "Owner" includes the buyer under a contract for deed, the grantor under a trust indenture, and the trustee of a trust, but does not include the seller under a contract for deed, the beneficiary of a trust, the lessee of a Lot, or a person who holds an interest in a Lot as security for a debt or other Obligation. The identity of the Owner will be determined from the Official Records of the County Recorder, as of the date of the exercise of powers or rights or the performance by such Owner of obligations created by this Declaration. 1.17 Person. "Person" or "Persons" is any individual, trustee, personal representative, partnership, firm, association, joint venture, corporation, limited liability company, or any other form of entity which is capable of holding title to real property. 1.18 Plat. "Plat' is the subdivision plat which describes the Property which is attached to this Declaration as Exhibit B. 1.19 Property. "Property" is the real property described in Exhibit A, and any real property which may subsequently be made subject to this Declaration by amendment of PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 6 this Declaration. 1.20 Rules and Regulations. "Rules and Regulations" are those rules and regulations adopted by the Association, from time to time, pertaining to the operation and use of the Common Areas by all Owners and Occupants. 1.21 Site Plan. "Site Plan" is the Site Plan attached to this Declaration as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by this reference, as it may be amended from time to time by Developer. ARTICLE II OWNERS' ASSOCIATION 2.01 Formation of the Association. The Developer has formed a Montana non- profit corporation named "PT Land Property Owners' Association, Inc., to act as the owners' association for the Property. 2.02 The Purposes of the Association. The purposes for which the Association has been organized are as follows: (a) To own, maintain, preserve, and improve the Common Areas, to control, maintain, repair, improve, and replace the Common Area Improvements, and to provide the Owners with such other services as they may approve. (b) To fix and levy Assessments on the Lots, and to collect those Assessments, in order to obtain funds with which to carry out the duties and obligations of the Association under this Declaration. (c) To enforce the provisions of this Declaration. (d) To exercise all other rights and powers which the Association now has or may hereafter acquire under the corporation laws of the State of Montana. 2.03 Membership in the Association. Every Owner will automatically be a member of the Association. A Owner's membership in the Association will commence when that Owner acquires a Lot, and will terminate when that Owner sells the Lot. Membership in the Association is an appurtenance to each Lot, and may not be transferred separately from each Lot. However, an Owner may grant an Occupant of its Lot a proxy to vote that Owner's membership during the Occupant's possession of the Lot. The proxy must be in writing, must be delivered to the Association, must specify whether the Occupant's right to vote the Owner's membership extends to all issues or only to certain specified issues, and must describe any other terms and conditions of the Occupant's . proxy. 2.04. Voting rights of Owners. The Owner or Owners of a Lot will have one vote • with respect to that Lot at all meetings of the members of the Association, except that the Developer will be entitled to four votes for each Lot which it owns until the Developer becomes the owner of less than twenty-five percent of the Lots, after which the Developer PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 7 will have only one vote for each Lot which it owns. When two or more Persons are the co- owners of a Lot, the vote for that Lot shall be exercised as the co-owners may determine, but in no event may more than one vote be cast for each Lot, except by the Developer as set forth in this section. 2.05. Ownership and use of Common Areas. Upon the filing of the Plat, Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 of the Plat, which are shown on the Plat as open space parcels, will be transferred to the Association. The Association will own and preserve the open space parcels as open space in perpetuity, and the open space parcels will be available for the use and enjoyment of the Owners. The green space areas shown along Oak Street and Baxter Lane on the Plat will be owned by the Owners of the Lots in which the green space areas are located, but the green space areas are dedicated in perpetuity for use as landscaped open space and walkways, and no buildings, parking lots, or other improvements may be constructed in the green space areas without the prior written consent of the Association. ARTICLE III CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS 3.01 Streets and Utilities. Developer shall construct, or cause to be constructed, all public streets and utilities required by the Commercial PUD. Public streets and utilities include, without limitation, the systems for storm drains, sanitary sewer, water (fire and domestic), natural gas, electricity, and telephone, and streets including extensions to North 14`hAvenue, North 15'Avenue, Patrick Street, Tschache Lane, and the reconstruction of Baxter Lane. 3.02 General Construction Requirements. (a) Compliance With Laws. All construction activities performed by a Owner within the Property shall be performed in compliance with all laws, rules, regulations, orders and ordinances of the city, county, state, and federal governments, or any department or agency thereof, affecting improvements constructed within the Property. (b) Interference. The construction activities of a Owner shall not: (i) cause any unreasonable increase in the cost of constructing improvements upon another Owner's Lot; (ii) unreasonably interfere with construction work being performed on any other part of the Property; (iii) unreasonably interfere with the use, occupancy,or enjoyment of any part of the remainder of the Property by any other Owner; (iv) cause any other Owner to be in violation of any law, rule, regulation, order, or ordinance of the City, county, state,.or federal government, or any department or agency of those governments. PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 8 0 0 (c) General Construction Indemnity. Each Owner shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each other Owner from all claims, actions and proceedings and costs incurred in connection therewith (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit) resulting from any accident, injury, loss, or damage whatsoever occurring to any Person or to the property of any Person arising out of or resulting from the negligent performance of any construction activities performed or authorized by such indemnifying Owner. Any damage occurring to any portion of the Property as a result of such construction work shall be the responsibility of the Owner performing such construction work or causing such construction work to be performed and shall be repaired by such Owner, at such Owner's sole cost and expense, to the same condition as existed immediately prior to such work promptly upon the completion of such construction work. 3.03 Construction Along Common Boundary Line. Any Owner constructing, along a common property line between Lots shall do so in a manner that does not result in damage to the improvements in place on the adjoining Lot. 3.04 Signs. No exterior identification signs shall be allowed within the Property except as permitted by (i) the City and any applicable City ordinances or Commerical PUD specific requirements, and (ii) the Sign Guidelines which are attached to this Declaration as Exhibit E, i or (iii) at the discretion or judgment of the Association. ARTICLE IV COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS 4.01 General Restrictions. Each Owner shall be permitted to construct or cause to be constructed such buildings or structures, in the locations and with the heights, exterior configurations, and designs as the City shall approve pursuant to the Commercial PUD, so long as such improvements (i) do not violate City imposed parking requirements, (ii) are built in accordance with all set-back, zoning and other ordinances of the City, and (iii) do not exceed the maximum square footages or the maximum height permitted by the Design Guidelines (see Exhibit "D"). 4.02 Amended Plat and Site Plan. • (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Declaration, each Owner and Occupant, by taking title subject to this Declaration, hereby approves of the PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 9 0 0 processing and recording by Developer of, and agrees to execute and acknowledge, an amendment to the Plat(the"Amended Plat")to reflect any changes or modifications to the Plat which do not materially and adversely affect the use or development of the Lot(s) of the Owner or directly or indirectly impose on the Owner or Occupants any greater obligations than those preciously agreed to by the Owner or Occupants. Each Owner agrees to execute and acknowledge an amendment to this Declaration, and each Occupant agrees to execute and acknowledge a subordination to this Declaration, as so amended, provided that the amendment reflects only the changes required for this Declaration to be consistent with the Amended Plat. (b) At such time as Developer requests, each Owner shall execute an amendment to this Declaration to update the Site Plan with an "as-built" Site Plan (the "Amended Site Plan") to reflect the Amended Plat and the improvements constructed on the Lots. 4.03 Parking Standards. The parking areas on each Lot will always contain at least that number of parking spaces for automobiles, and driveways and footways incidental to the parking spaces, as is necessary to comply with all City requirements. 4.04 Grading. Any regrading of a Lot shall require the priorwritten approval of the Association, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. ARTICLE V USE RESTRICTIONS 5.01 Use in General. The Lots may only be used for the purposes permitted by the Design Guidelines which are attached to this Declaration as Exhibit D 5.02 Generally Prohibited Uses. No use or operation will be made, conducted or permitted on or with respect to all or any part of the Property, which use or operation is obnoxious to, or out of harmony with; the development or operation of a first-class commerical area, including but not limited to, the following: (a) Any public or private nuisance. (b) Any noise or sound that is objectionable due to intermittence, beat, frequency, shrillness, or loudness. (c) Any smell that is offensive or objectionable due to its nature or intensity. (d) Any excessive quantity of dust, dirt, or fly ash; provided however, this prohibition shall not preclude the sale of soils, fertilizers, or other garden materials or building materials in containers if incident to the operation of a home improvement or other similar store. (e) Any fire, explosion, or other damaging or dangerous hazard, including the • storage, display, or sale of explosives or fireworks. PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 10 0 0 • An assembly, manufacture, distillation, refining, smelting, agriculture, or (fl Y Y 9 9 9 mining operations. (g) Any mobile home or trailer court, labor camp,junkyard, stock yard, or animal raising. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pet shops shall be permitted within the Property. (h) Any drilling for and/or removal of subsurface substances. (i) Any dumping of garbage or refuse, other than in enclosed, covered receptacles intended for that purpose. 0) Any automobile body and fender repair work, except within those Lots to be designed specifically for such use and referred to in an amendment to these covenants. (k) Any flea market or swap meet. (1) Any store in which a substantial portion of the inventory consists of pornography, sexual products, and similar"adult" goods, publications, movies, or videos. 5.03 Rules and Regulations. The Association from time to time may adopt reasonable Rules and Regulations pertaining to the use of the Property by the Occupants, provided that all such Rules and Regulations and other matters affecting the users of the • Property (a) will apply equally and without discrimination to all Lots, (b) comply with City ordinances, and (c) are otherwise consistent with this Declaration. Developer adopts the Rules and Regulations attached to this Declaration as Exhibit "F", until such time as different Rules and Regulations shall be adopted by the Association.An amendment of the Rules and Regulations may be adopted with the approval of the Owners of a majority of the Lots, shall not be deemed to be, nor shall it require, an amendment to this Declaration. 5.04 Additional Use Restrictions and Requirements. In connection with Developer's transfer or conveyance of a Lot, Developer reserves the right to impose such additional restrictions on operation or use requirements on the transferred Lot or the Lots Developer continues to own, which restrictions are consistent and not in conflict with Developers then-existing agreements, as may be agreed to by Developer and the Owner. ARTICLE VI MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 6.01 Common Area Maintenance Obligation. (a) From and after the date upon which the Common Area Improvements are substantially completed by the Developer,the Association shall maintain the Common Area Improvements or cause them to be maintained, in good order, condition, and repair. The Association shall have the right,from time to time, to select another Person or Persons to maintain the Common Area Improvements and delegate the Association's obligations with respect to the Common Area S Improvements to such Person(s). The Association may hire companies affiliated with the Developer to perform the maintenance and operation of the Common Area Improvements, PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 11 but only if the rates charged by such companies are competitive with those of other companies furnishing similar services in the Bozeman, Montana area. (b) The minimum standard of maintenance for the Common Area Improvements shall be comparable to the standard of maintenance followed in other first-class Commercial Planned Unit Developments of comparable size in the Bozeman, Montana area and in any event in compliance with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, orders, and ordinances, City and County Noxious Weed Management Plans, and the provisions of this Declaration. All Common Area Improvements shall be repaired or replaced with materials at least equal to the quality of the materials being repaired or replaced so as to maintain the architectural and aesthetic harmony and integration of the Property as a whole. In any event, the maintenance and repair obligation shall include but not be limited to the following: (1) Landscaped Areas. Cleaning and maintaining (including any requirement as may be imposed by the City to maintain landscape or to remove debris) all landscaped areas and landscaping in the Common Areas; repairing automatic sprinkler systems or water lines in the Common Areas; irrigating, weeding, pruning, fertilizing, and replacing shrubs and other landscaping as necessary in the Common Areas; and the control of noxious weeds in the Common Areas; provided, however, that if any Owner requires or installs "special' landscaping (i.e. beyond the standard landscaping requirements for the remainder of the Property) in a Common Area, the maintenance and cost of such special landscaping shall be borne solely by such Owner without cost or expense to the other Owners and shall not be included in Common Area Maintenance Costs. (ii) Public Trails. Cleaning, snow removal, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the trails in the Common Areas. (iii) Stormwater retention areas.Taking all actions required to maintain the function and capacity of the stormwater retention areas. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, each Owner shall maintain and repair, at its sole cost, in a clean, sightly and safe condition its Lot and all appurtenances thereto. (c) If the Association fails to maintain or replace Common Area Improvements according to the plans approved by the City, the City may, at its option, maintain or replace those Common Area Improvements in accordance with City ordinances. The City's representatives, contractors, and engineers will have the right to enter upon the Property and perform such work, and the Association and the Owners will permit them to do so. The City will bill the Association for the cost of the maintenance or replacements. (d) The association is only required to maintain the Common Areas, and is not required to maintain sidewalks and boulevard landscaping which is not part of the Common Areas. Each Owner is responsible for maintaining the sidewalks and boulevards in front of that Owner's lot. 6.02 Restoration of Common Area Improvements. If any of the Common Area PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 12 0 0 Improvements are damaged or destroyed, whether insured or uninsured, the Association shall restore, repair, or rebuild those Common Area Improvements with all due diligence as nearly as possible to at least as good a condition as they were in immediately prior to the damage or destruction. Any cost of the restoration, repair, or rebuilding which is not reimbursed by insurance shall be a Common Area Maintenance Cost. 6.03 Common Area Maintenance Costs. Common Area Maintenance Costs shall include, without limitation, all expenditures, costs, premiums, and expenses for the following: (a) casualty and public liability insurance for the Common Areas and improvements located on the Common Areas, in the amounts and types set forth in Article X below, and payment of any deductible amount in the event of a claim; (b) repairs for any damage to the Common Area Improvements, to the extent that those costs are not covered by insurance proceeds; (c) all general maintenance and repairs with respect to the Common Area Improvements, whether required by the enactment or operation of law, or otherwise, including, without limitation, resurfacing, cleaning, sweeping, and snow removal of the trails; (d) maintenance and repair of light standards, all plantings, sprinkler systems, and • landscaping; (e) any public utility or governmental charges, surcharges, and any other costs levied, assessed, or imposed pursuant to assessment districts, laws, statutes, regulations, codes, and ordinances promulgated under or created by any governmental or quasi-governmental authority in connection with the development of the Property or the use of the Common Areas; (f) necessary tools and supplies; (g) other costs and fees necessary or beneficial, in the Association's reasonable judgment, for the maintenance and operation of the Common Areas, including the cost of enforcing the terms of this Declaration which are applicable to the Common Areas. 6.04 Payment of Common Area Maintenance Costs. Common Area Maintenance Costs shall not include any costs of the initial construction of the Common Area Improvements, which will be constructed by the Developer. After the initial construction of the Common Area Improvements, the Common Area Maintenance Costs shall be paid to the Association by each Owner as follows: (a) Each Owner shall pay the Association, on the first day of each calendar month, an amount reasonably estimated by the Association to be one twelfth (1/12) of that Owner's share of the annual Common Area Maintenance Costs(which estimate, except for the first calendar year, shall be based on the prior year's expenses and reasonably anticipated changes in cost). A Owner's share of Common Area Maintenance Costs during PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 13 0 0 any applicable monthly, quarterly or annual accounting period shall be the total Common Area Maintenance Costs incurred during that period multiplied by the quotient arrived at by dividing the number of square feet in that Owner's Lot, not including any portion of the Lot which is in the right-of-way for any street, by the total number of net square feet in all of the Lots. This estimated monthly charge may be adjusted by the Association at the end of any calendar quarter on the basis of the Association's experience and reasonably anticipated costs. (b) Within a reasonable time following the end of each calendar year, the Association shall furnish to each Owner a statement covering the calendar year just expired showing the total amount of Common Area Maintenance Costs incurred by the Association, the amount of each Owner's share of the Common Area Maintenance Costs for that calendar year, and the payments made by each Owner with respect to that calendar year as required by subparagraph (a)above. Owners shall have the right to audit any such statements in accordance with subparagraph (e)below. If a Owner's share of the Common Area Maintenance Costs exceeds that Owner's payments, the Owner shall pay the deficiency to the Association within ten (10) days after receipt of the statement. If the payments exceed that Owner's share of the Common Area Maintenance Costs,the Owner shall be entitled to offset the excess against the next payments which become due to the Association pursuant to subparagraph (a) above. (c) Payment of any Common Area Maintenance Costs owed to the Association under this Declaration which is more than ten (10) days past due shall be subject to a late payment penalty often percent(10%). In addition, for as long as the amounts owed to the • Association remain unpaid, those unpaid amounts shall bear interest at the Default Rate. Each Owner acknowledges that the late payment of any monthly installment will cause the Association to incur certain costs and expenses not otherwise contemplated, the exact amount of which is extremely difficult and impractical to fix. Those costs and expenses will include, without limitation, administrative and collection costs, processing and accounting expenses, and other costs and expenses necessary and incidental to those costs and expenses. It is,therefore, agreed that this late charge represents a reasonable estimate of those costs and expenses and is fair compensation to the Association for its loss suffered by the Owner's nonpayment. The late charge provisions contained in this section are in addition to and do not diminish or represent a substitute for any or all of the Association's other rights to enforce the provisions of this Declaration. (d) Within six (6) months after receipt of any Common Area Expense statement, any Owner may audit that statement. If it is determined as a result of an audit that the auditing Owner has paid in excess of the amount required pursuant to this Declaration, then the overpayment shall be credited toward the next installment that would otherwise be due from the Owner. In addition, if the Owner paid more than five percent (5%) over the amount that the Owner should have paid (as determined by the approved audit), then the Association shall pay all of the auditing Owner's reasonable costs and expenses connected with the audit. (e) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Declaration to the contrary and without in any way modifying or limiting a Owner's obligations under this Declaration, each i Owner may enter into agreements with its Occupants pursuant to which the Occupants are PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 14 0 0 obligated to reimburse the Owner for some or all Common Area Maintenance Costs allocable to the Lot and/or other expenses related to the operation and maintenance of the Common Areas on terms which are more or less favorable than the terms of this Declaration with respect to that Owner's payment of its share of Common Area Maintenance Costs. If the agreement is entered into on less favorable terms, subject to the immediately following sentence, the Owner will make up the shortfall. Likewise; in connection with the transfer or conveyance of a Lot, the Association may enter into an agreement with the respective Owner pursuant to which the Owner is obligated to reimburse the Association for some or all Common Area Maintenance Costs allocable to the subject Lot and/or other expenses related to the operation and maintenance of the Common Areas on terms which are more or less favorable than the terms of this Declaration with respect to that Owner's payment of its share of Common Area Maintenance Costs. If the agreement is entered into on less favorable terms, the Association shall assume the shortfall. 6.05 Building Improvements. After completion of construction on its Lot, each Owner or its Occupant shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain and keep its improvements located on its Lot in first-class, good, clean condition and state of repair, in compliance with all governmental laws, rules, regulations, orders, and ordinances exercising jurisdiction over them, and in compliance with the provisions of this Declaration. Each Owner or its Occupant shall store all trash and garbage in adequate containers, will locate those containers so that they are not readily visible from the parking area, and will arrange for regular removal of the trash or garbage. If a Owner or its Occupant fails to comply with Section 7.05, then the Association shall have the right to give the defaulting Owner written notice of the default, specifying the particulars of the default. If the Owner which receives the notice fails to cure the default within thirty (30) days after its receipt of the notice, or if the nature of the default is such that it cannot be reasonably cured within a thirty (30) day period and the Owner does not commence to cure the default within the thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently pursue the cure to completion, then the Association may cure the default and then bill the defaulting Owner for the expense incurred. If the defaulting Owner does not pay the bill within fifteen (15) days, the Association shall have all rights with respect to the bill as are provided for in Article XII. 6.06 Control of noxious weeds. The Association will control Noxious Weeds in the Common Areas, and each Owner will control Noxious Weeds in that Owner's Lot, as required by the Montana Noxious Weed Control Act(Mont. Code Ann. Section 7-22-2101 through 7-22-2153) and the rules and regulations of the Gallatin County Weed Control District, as they may be amended from time to time. Both unimproved and improved lots shall be managed for Noxious Weeds. If a Owner does not control the Noxious Weeds on that Owner's Lot within ten days after receiving a written demand for that action from the Association, the Association may cause the Noxious Weeds to be controlled, and may assess the cost of the control against the Owner pursuant to Article 6.05 of this Declaration ARTICLE VII ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS 7.01 Duties of Owners. Except as provided in Section 11.03, neither Owners nor PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 15 • r Occupants shall release, generate, treat, use, store, dump,transport, handle, or dispose of any Hazardous Material within the Lots or otherwise permit the presence of any Hazardous Material on, under, or about the Lots or transport any Hazardous Material to or from the Lots. Any such use, handling or storage permitted under Section 11.03 shall be in accordance with all Environmental Laws and all other applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations now or hereafter promulgated by any governmental authority having jurisdiction thereof. Neither Owners nor Occupants shall install, operate or maintain any above, below, or at grade tank, sump, pit, pond, lagoon, or other storage or treatment vessel or device on or about the Lots with the exception of gasoline, diesel and/or oil underground storage tanks or other storage devices or containers utilized in connection with an automobile gasoline and/or service station provided that such use is permitted in the Property, and further provided that the operator of the service station has obtained the Association's consent to the underground storage tanks or other storage devices or containers pursuant to last paragraph of Section 11.03 of this Declaration. 7.02 Specific Construction Materials. No Owner or Occupant shall introduce, or permit any other Person to introduce, any friable asbestos, radioactive material, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, or devices containing polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs)into any portion of the Property. 7.03 Permitted Use,Storage, Handling,and Disposal of Hazardous Materials. Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 11.01 to the contrary, incident to the normal operation of motor vehicles within the Parking Areas,the Owners and their Occupants may utilize gasoline and petroleum products used to fuel and/or lubricate motor vehicles. In addition, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 11.01 to the contrary, the Owners or their Occupants may utilize cleaning products and sell and otherwise merchandise products, which may contain Hazardous Materials, so long as those products are commonly utilized for maintenance purposes or merchandised in other Commerical areas, and so long as those products are safely handled and stored in compliance with applicable laws. A Owner or its Occupants may also use other Hazardous Materials in connection with its use of its Lot if the Owner has received the Association's prior consent to the use. The Association shall not unreasonably withhold or delay its consent provided (i) the Owner or Occupant demonstrates to the Association's reasonable satisfaction that the Hazardous Materials (a) are necessary or useful to the Owner's or Occupant's business, (b) will be monitored, used, stored, handled, and disposed of in compliance with all Environmental Laws, (c)will not endanger any persons or property, (d)are consistent with and normally found in first-class commercial establishments, and (e)will not invalidate or limit the coverage or increase the premiums of any insurance policy effecting or covering the Store, the Lot, or the Property; (ii) such use is not prohibited by Article VI of this Declaration; (iii)the Owner or Occupant provides the Association with such security as may be reasonably required by the Association; and (iv)the Owner or Occupant satisfies any other requirements the Association may reasonably impose with respect to the Owner's or Occupant's use of the Hazardous Materials. ARTICLE VIII PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 16 ASSESSMENT LIENS 8.01 Assessment Lien. If any sum of money payable by any Owner pursuant to any provision of this Declaration to the Association is not paid when due, and after the defaulting Owner has been notified in writing of the default and the expiration of any applicable grace period set forth in this Declaration, or a reasonable period of time not to exceed thirty (30) days if there is no express grace period, the Association shall have the right to record, in the office of the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder, a notice of Assessment Lien ("Notice of Assessment Lien") which shall set forth the then-delinquent amount owed by the defaulting Owner(including, if applicable, interest at the Default Rate) and a legal description of the Lot within the Property owned by that defaulting Owner. Upon recordation of a Notice of Assessment Lien, the then delinquent amount owed by the Owner, together with interest on that amount, shall constitute an Assessment Lien upon the Lot described in the Notice of Assessment Lien. If the amount secured by an Assessment Lien is not paid in full within ten (10) days after a Notice of Assessment Lien has been recorded, and the Owner has been provided with a copy of the recorded Notice of Assessment Lien, the Person to whom the amounts are owed may enforce payment of the assessment or other amount due, or enforce the Assessment Lien against the property of the delinquent Owner, by foreclosing the Assessment Lien against the delinquent Owner's Lot in accordance with the laws relating to the foreclosure of realty mortgages (including the right to recover any deficiency), either judicially or non judicially under a power of sale, such power being hereby granted to the Association as a mortgagee. 8.02 Assessments as Personal Obligations. Each amount due by a Owner pursuant to any provision of this Declaration, together with interest at the Default Rate, costs and attorneys'fees, shall be the personal obligation of the defaulting Owner, but the personal obligation of the Owner shall not be deemed to discharge or limit the lien on that Owner's Lot. No Owner shall avoid liability for payment of any amount due under this Declaration which fell due while that Person was the Owner by nonuse of the Common Areas or by transfer or abandonment of the Owner's property. If any Lot within the Property as to which a Notice of Assessment Lien has been recorded pursuant to Section 12.01 is sold, conveyed or otherwise transferred, in whole or in part, by the Owner of that Lot, the property shall remain subject and subordinate to the Assessment Lien created by reason of the delinquency described in the recorded Notice of Assessment Lien. 8.03 Superiority of Assessment Lien.The Assessment Lien provided for above shall be superior to any and all other charges, liens and encumbrances which hereafter in any manner may arise or be imposed upon any portion of the Property, regardless of the order of filing of any of the foregoing; provided, however, that the Assessment Lien shall in all events be subject and subordinate to: (a) Liens for taxes and other public charges which by applicable law are expressly made superior to the lien of the Assessment Lien; (b) Any mortgages, trust indentures, deeds of trust, or security instruments of any kind recorded in the office of the County clerk and recorder prior to the date of recordation of a Notice of Assessment Lien; provided, however,that all liens recorded after the recordation of a Notice of Assessment Lien shall be junior and subordinate to the PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 17 • 0 Assessment Lien created by reason of the delinquency described in the recorded Notice of • Assessment Lien; and (c) The rights of any and all Occupants occupying any portion of the Property under written leases, whether the lease at issue was dated and/or a notice of the lease was recorded before or after the Assessment Lien at issue. If a Owner is delinquent in paying any amounts due under this Declaration, and as a result of the delinquency a Notice of Assessment Lien is recorded as provided in this Declaration,the Association may record subsequent Notices of Assessment Lien as to any amounts owed by that Owner which become delinquent after the recordation of the initial Notice of Assessment Lien, and the priority of the Assessment Lien as to any amounts thereafter becoming delinquent shall be fixed as of the date of recordation of the initial Notice of Assessment Lien, but only if the initial Notice of Assessment Lien has not been discharged. A person may prosecute a single Assessment Lien foreclosure action as to amounts delinquent at the time a Notice of Assessment Lien is recorded and as to amounts thereafter becoming delinquent, up to and including the time a final judgment is rendered in the action. 8.04 Release of Assessment Lien.Within 10 days after the curing of any default for which a Notice of Assessment Lien was recorded, the Association will record an appropriate release of any Notice of Assessment Lien upon payment by the defaulting Owner of a reasonable fee, to be determined by the Association, to cover the costs of preparing and recording the release, together with the payment of such other costs, including, without limitation, reasonable legal fees, court costs, interest, and fees, as the Association shall have incurred in connection the Assessment Lien. 8.05 Litigation of Assessment Lien. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Declaration, any Owner shall have the right to contest, in a court of competent jurisdiction, the recordation of any Notice of Assessment Lien against that Owner's Lot on the basis that the recordation of the Notice of Assessment Lien or the amounts claimed to be delinquent in the Notice of Assessment Lien are incorrect or improper under the provisions of this Declaration. The prevailing party in the action shall be entitled to recover from the other party or parties its reasonable attorneys'fees incurred in connection with the action. 8.05 Certificate regarding payment of Assessments. At the written request of any Owner, the Association will provide that Owner with a certificate in recordable form signed by an officer of the Association which states whether any of the Assessments levied on that Owner's Lot have not been paid as of the date of the certificate, and if so the amounts and due dates of the unpaid Assessments,the interest which has accrued on the unpaid Assessments as of the date of the certificate, and the amount of interest which will accrue on the unpaid Assessments each day until they are paid. Neither the Owner nor any Person who subsequently purchase the Lot or obtains a mortgage ortrust indenture on the Lot will be liable for any unpaid Assessments which are not disclosed by such a certificate, and the Lot will not be subject to a lien for any unpaid Assessments which are not disclosed by such a certificate. , PT LAND SUBDIVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, PAGE 18 8.06. Assessment liens which rria be imposed b the City. If the Association Y p Y tY fails to maintain the Common Areas and the Common Area Improvements after a written demand for such maintenance has been made to the Association or the Owners by the City, the City may enter the Common Areas and maintain them. The cost of the maintenance will be a personal obligation of the Owners, and if the costs are not paid when due, the costs will constitute a lien against the Lots which the City can enforce in the manner provided by law for foreclosing mortgages, and a lien on the Common Areas which the City can collect in the manner provided by law for collecting general property taxes. ARTICLE IX AMENDMENT 9.01 Amendment of this Declaration. This Declaration, including the Design Guidelines in Exhibit D and the Sign Guidelines in Exhibit E, may be amended with the approval of the Owners of at least 80 percent of the Lots, and the Rules and Regulations in Exhibit F may be amended with the approval of the Owners of at least 50 percent of the Lots. An Owner's approval of a proposed amendment must be indicated by the execution of a consent to amendment in recordable form by the Owner. The consent to amendment must contain the full text of the proposed amendment or amendments to this Declaration. After sufficient consents have been obtained, the Association must record a notice of the amendment of this Declaration, together with the consents which provide the basis for the • amendment. 9.02. Consent of the City required for certain amendments. The following provisions were included in this Declaration as a condition to approval of the final Plat, and may not be amended or revoked by the Owners unless the City Commission consents to the amendment: [LIST PROVISIONS, IF ANY, INCLUDED AS A CONDITION TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL]. ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS 10.01 Binding Effect.All of the limitations, covenants, conditions, easements, and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall attach to and run with the title to each Lot and shall benefit or be binding upon the successors and assigns of the respective Owners. This Declaration and all the terms, covenants, and conditions contained in it shall be enforceable as covenants which run with the land in favor of all or any portion of the Lots. 10.02 Breach Shall Not Permit Termination. It is expressly agreed that no breach of this Declaration shall entitle any Owner to cancel, rescind, or otherwise terminate this Declaration, and such limitations shall not affect in any manner any of the rights or remedies which the Owners may have by reason of any breach of this Declaration. 10.03 Enforcement of this Declaration. The provisions of this Declaration may be enforced either by the Association or by any Owner. If any dispute arises with respect to this Declaration, before the Association and/or the Owners involved in the dispute file a 0 0 lawsuit, they will attempt to resolve the dispute with the assistance of a professional . mediator, or through other mutually acceptable means of dispute resolution. If the parties to the dispute are unable to resolve the dispute through those means, then any of the parties to the dispute may file a lawsuit requesting specific performance, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, damages, or any other remedy provided by law or available in equity. In addition to the recovery of any amounts expended on behalf of the defaulting Owner, the prevailing party in the litigation shall be entitled to recover from the losing party such amount as the court may adjudge to be reasonable attorneys'fees and costs, both at trial and on appeal. 10.04 Breach - Effect on Mortgagee and Right to Cure. Breach of any of the covenants or restrictions contained in this Declaration shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith, but all of the foregoing provisions, restrictions, and covenants shall be binding and effective against any Owner who acquires title by foreclosure, by trustee's sale, or by deed in lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale; provided, however, that any such Owner who acquires title by foreclosure or trustee's sale or by deed in lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale shall take title free of any liens created or provided for under this Declaration, though otherwise subject to the provisions of this Declaration. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Declaration for notices of default, the Mortgagee of any Owner in default under this Declaration shall be entitled to notice of the default, in the same manner that other notices are required to be given under this Declaration; provided, however, that the Mortgagee shall have, prior to the time of the default, notified the Association of the Mortgagee's interest and mailing address. If any notice is given of the default of a Owner and the defaulting Owner has failed to cure or commence to cure that default as provided in this Declaration, then the Association or the Owner giving the notice of default covenants to give the Mortgagee (which has previously given the notice described above to the Owner) under any Mortgage affecting the Lot of the defaulting Owner an additional notice given in the manner provided above, that the defaulting Owner has failed to cure the default and the Mortgagee shall have thirty (30) days after the additional notice to cure the default, or, if the default cannot be cured within thirty(30)days, diligently to commence curing within such time and diligently pursue such cure to completion within a reasonable time after the notice of default. The giving of any notice of default or the failure to deliver a copy of the notice to any Mortgagee will not create any liability on the part of the Association or the Owner which declares a default. 10.05 Effect on Third Parties. The rights, privileges, or immunities conferred under this Declaration are for the benefit of the Owners and not for any third party. 10.06 No Partnership. Neither this Declaration nor any acts of the Owners shall be deemed or construed by the parties to this Declaration, or any of them, or by any third person, to create the relationship of principal and agent, or of partnership, or of joint venture, or of any association between any of the Owners to this Declaration. 10.07 Modification. No modification, waiver, amendment, discharge, or change of this Declaration shall be valid unless it is in writing and signed by all of the Owners. Consent to a change or alteration of this Declaration requested with respect to a specific Lot in order to facilitate the business being pursued by the Occupant of that Lot shall not be unreasonably withheld by any Owner or other person or entity whose consent or approval 0 • or the change or alteration is required by this Declaration, unless the change or alteration would have a material adverse affect on the Owner or other person or entity. If a request to change or alter this Declaration is made by any "institutional lender," as defined in this section, proposing to extend credit to be secured by a first trust indenture, first deed of trust, or first mortgage on the interest of any Owner, in order to (i) clarify the rights of that lender under this Declaration and/or(ii) otherwise better secure to the lender its ability to protect its security, consent to the changes or alteration of this Declaration shall not be unreasonably withheld by any Owner or other person or entity whose consent or approval of the changes or alteration is required by this Declaration. The term "institutional lender," as used in this section, shall be deemed to mean any bank, savings or building and loan association, trust, or other similar institutional type of lender (including loan service correspondent companies designated by any such lender). 10.08 Severability. If any term, covenant, condition, provision, or agreement contained in this Declaration is held to be invalid, void, or otherwise unenforceable, by any court of competent jurisdiction; the holding shall in no way affect the validity of enforceability of any other term, covenant, condition, provision, or agreement contained in this Declaration. 10.09 Governing Law. This Declaration and the obligations of the Owners under this Declaration shall be interpreted, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Montana. 10.10 Terminology: Captions. All personal pronouns used in this Declaration, whether used in the masculine, feminine, or neuter gender, shall include all other genders; the singular shall include the plural and vice versa. Article and section titles or captions contained in this Declaration are inserted as a matter of convenience and for reference, and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope of this Declaration or any provisions of this Declaration. 10.11 Counterparts. This Declaration may be executed in multiple counterparts, .each of which shall be deemed to be an original agreement, and all of which shall constitute one agreement. 10.12 Consent. In any instance in which any Owner shall be requested to consent to or approve of any matter with respect to which consent or approval is required by any of the provisions of this Declaration, the consent or approval or disapproval shall be given in writing. 10.13 Estoppel Certificate. Each Owner severally covenants that upon written request of any other Owner it will issue to the other Owner or to any prospective Mortgagee or purchaser of the other Owner's Lot an Estoppel Certificate stating: (a) whether the Owner to whom the request has been directed knows of any default under this Declaration and if there are known defaults specifying the nature of those defaults; (b) whether to its knowledge this Declaration has been assigned, modified, or amended in any way(and if it has, then stating the nature of the modifications or amendments); and (c)whether to the Owner's knowledge this Declaration as of that date is in full force.and effect. • 0 10.14 Not a Public Dedication. Nothing contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Property to the general public or for the general public or for any public purpose whatsoever, it being the intention of the Developer that this Declaration shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes expressed in this Declaration. 10.15 Release. If a Owner sells, transfers, or assigns its entire Lot or its interest in its Lot, it shall, except as provided in this Declaration, be released from its unaccrued obligations under this Declaration from and after the date of the sale, transfer or assignment. It shall be a condition precedent to the release and discharge of any Grantor or assignor Ownerfrom its unaccrued obligations underthis Declaration that-the Grantoror assignor shall give notice to the Association of the sale, transfer, conveyance, or assignment and the name and address of the transferee within thirty days afterthe filing for record of the instrument effecting the same,. Anything in this section to the contrary notwithstanding, it is expressly understood and agreed that no sale, transfer, or assignment of a Lot shall effectuate a release of its Transferor with respect to obligations which accrued prior to the transfer. 10.16 Eminent domain. If any part of the Common Areas shall be taken by eminent domain or any other similar authority of law, the entire award for value of the land and improvements so taken shall belong to the Association. However, any Owner whose Lot is affected by the condemnation of the Common Areas may file a claim with the condemning authority over and above the value of the Common Areas so taken to the extent of any damage suffered by that Owner's Lot resulting from the severance of the area taken. 10.17 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of each of the covenants and agreements contained in this Declaration. 10.18 Excuse for Nonperformance. Each Owner shall be excused from performing any obligation or undertaking provided in this Declaration, except any obligation to pay any sums of money under the applicable provisions of this Declaration (unless the payment is conditioned upon performance of any obligation or undertaking excused by this Section), if and so long as the performance of the obligation is prevented or delayed, retarded, or hindered by act of God, fire, earthquake, floods, explosion, actions of the elements, war, invasion, insurrection, riot, mob violence, sabotage, inability to procure or general shortage of labor, equipment facilities, materials,or supplies in the ordinary course on the open market, failure of normal transportation, strikes, lockouts, action of labor unions, condemnation, requisition, laws, orders of governmental agencies, approvals, or permits despite the exercise of due diligence and best efforts by a Owner or any other cause, whether similar or dissimilar to the foregoing, not within the reasonable control of the Owner, other than the lack of or inability to obtain funds. 10.19 Duration. This Declaration and each term, easement, covenant, restriction, and undertaking of this Declaration will remain in effect for a term of sixty(60) years from the its recordation date and will automatically be renewed for successive ten (10) year i periods thereafter unless the Owners owning two-thirds or more of the land comprising the 0 0 Property elect in writing not to so renew. 10.20 Waiver of Default. No waiver of any default by any Owner shall be implied from any omission by any other Owner to take any action in respect of the default if the default continues or is repeated. No express written waiver of any default shall affect any default or cover any period of time other than the default and period of time specified in the express waiver. One or more written waivers of any default in the performance of any term, provision, or covenant contained in this Declaration shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default in the performance of the same term, provision, or covenant or any other term, provision, or.covenant contained in this Declaration. The consent or approval by any Owner to or of any act or request by any other Owner requiring consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the consent to or approval of any subsequent similar acts or requests. The rights and remedies given to any Owner by this Declaration shall be deemed to be cumulative and no one of such rights and remedies shall be exclusive of any of the others, or if any other right or remedy at law or in equity which any Owner might otherwise have by virtue of a default under this Declaration, and the exercise of one right or remedy by any Owner shall not impair the Owner's standing to exercise any other right or remedy. 10.21 Common Ownership.The ownership of all Lots in the Property by the same Person shall not result in the termination of this Declaration. Executed as of , 2006. PT LAND By: Jerry Perkins, Partner STATE OF ) :ss COUNTY OF ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2006, by as a general partner of PT Land. Notary's signature (SEAL) Notary's name: Notary public for the state of Residing at My commission expires ,20 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY Lots 1-5 of Block 1, Lots 1-4 of Block 2, Lots 1-6 of Block 3, and Lots 1-3 of Block 4 of the plat of PT Land Subdivision, in the City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, according to the official recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana. (Plat Reference: ) DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, EXHIBIT A, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PAGE 1 EXHIBIT "F" RULES AND REGULATIONS A. Lots 1. Each Owner shall use its best efforts to require the Occupants of that Owner's Lot to comply with all regulations with respect to the Common Areas, including, but not by way of limitation, posted speed limits, directional markings and parking stall markings. 2. All trash, refuse, and waste materials shall be regularly removed from the premises of each Lot within the Property, and until removal shall be stored (a) in adequate containers, which containers shall be covered with lids and shall be located so as not to be visible to the general public shopping in the Property, and (b) so as not to constitute any health and fire hazard or nuisance to any Occupant. Occupants who utilize an exterior trash storage receptacle and who are responsible for arranging for the regular removal of trash from that receptacle shall cause the removal to occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. 3. Except as may be permitted by the Association or by the terms of an occupant's lease, neither sidewalks nor walkways shall be used to display, store or place any merchandise, equipment, or devices. 4. No advertising medium shall be utilized which can be heard or experienced outside of any Lot, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,flashing lights, searchlights, loud speakers, phonographs, radios, or television. 5. No use shall be made of the Property or any portion or portions of the Property which would (a) violate any law, ordinance, or regulation, (b) constitute a nuisance, (c)constitute an extra-hazardous use, or(d)violate, suspend, or void any policy or polices of insurance on the Lots. 6. The Owners and Occupants shall use their best efforts to require all trucks servicing their respective Lots to load and unload those trucks so as not to materially interfere with the operation of the other Lots within the Property. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, EXHIBIT F, RULES AND REGULATIONS, PAGE 1 • • Development Guidelines • PT Land Planned Unit Development Development Guidelines June 2006 • • PT Land PUD DeveloP mMuidelines • Table of Contents • Introduction......................................................................................................................1 Architectural Guidelines...................................................................................................3 LandscapeGuidelines...................................................................................................30 Sign Design Criteria Guidelines......................................................................................34 } • i PT Land PUD DeveloP ment uidelines • Introduction The intent of these guidelines is to ensure that a high quality design is maintained within the development of the PT Land project. This project is presented as a network of neighborhoods that transition and blend intensities of uses: Service Warehouse, Support Services, Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor, and Financial Institutions and Services. Each of these neighborhoods transition between the existing adjoining neighbors and proposed uses. Document Organization This document is organized into four sections: Introduction, Architectural Guidelines, Landscape Guidelines and Sign Guidelines. The table of contents on Page i identifies the location of each section. Site Planning and Phasing Site Planning and Phasing is described in detail is the Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative for this project. Open Space Allocation Due to its location in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Corridor, this project will be developed as a planned unit development and meet or exceed the respective open space requirements. The PT Land PUD acts as an overall open space plan and schematically depicts a minimum of 30% open space for the entire PUD. A portion of the open space is distributed throughout the PUD to achieve a larger open space corridor along the Walton's Stream/Ditch and Mandeville Creek. It is the intention to demonstrate open space distribution over the entire project rather than 30% open space per lot. The Site Plan of the PT Land PUD demonstrates the ability to obtain 30% open space via greenway, stream setback and other open space areas. Community Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail: Pedestrian/bike trails are integrated into the PT Land development and extend into the adjoining neighborhoods to create a loop. With this project, a trail located near the Mandeville Creek will be installed. Sidewalks or trails will be installed adjacent to all public roads. Access The PT Land PUD is accessed via public roads and one private road. The public roads include Baxter Lane to the north, Oak Street to the south, North 15th Avenue to the west and North 11th 1 PT Land PUD DevelopmeRuidelines Avenue to the east. Tschache Lane, North 14'h Avenue and Patrick Street will be extended within the project. A private road within Lot 1, Block 4 also provides access to the site. Other Requirements Lighting, noise and utility design will comply with the B-2 zone and guidelines set forth by the City of Bozeman. i 2 PT Land PUD DeveloP ment Guidelines Architectural Guidelines Introduction The purpose of these guidelines is to provide a dynamic, attractive commercial corridor that reflects thoughtful design standards for four distinct neighborhoods proposed within the property included in this PUD. The objective for these guidelines is to describe the variety of building types and land uses that will create a sense of neighborhood. The differences from one set of design standards to another will create the dynamic and distinct sense of place desired by the city of Bozeman and the citizens who participate in the growth of our commercial districts. The building design standards are specific to the four neighborhood districts created in this PUD. The charter for each neighborhood is described in this guideline. Ideas regarding architecture, building placement, and the materials used to create our built environments are specific to the type of each neighborhood. A map showing the location of each neighborhood is shown in table 1-1. The four neighborhoods uses are listed in tables 1-A, 1-B,1-C,1- D and are included at the back of this document. For a comparison of uses relative to each neighborhood, a composite of permitted uses are shown in table 1-2. Scope These guidelines shall apply to all properties within the project PUD. These architectural guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the current Bozeman Design Objectives Plan (BDOP) adopted February 14'h 2005. The BDOP is a comprehensive development guideline and should be understood and adhered to when proposing a building within this property. Organization These guidelines address specific design standards to create the four neighborhood districts within this development. They outline the charter of each neighborhood and the building design standards that reinforce the sense of place intended for this development. These guidelines are intended to work in conjunction with the City of Bozeman design polices regarding building placement, parking alignment, pedestrian connections, and the green space in and around these neighborhoods. There is no need to reiterate the ideas already required within the City of Bozeman's design policies because the objectives within the BPOP apply to all entryway corridor developments within the city. The policies of the city for neighborhood design, site design guidelines, and corridor specific design guidelines are clearly described in great detail and are required to be adhered to as closely as possible. 3 PT Land PUD DevelopmAuidelines Guideline format and compliance Each guideline topic is presented within a chapter specific to each neighborhood district. The guidelines are presented in four chapters, one for each neighborhood. First, the policy for building design and/or site planning is provided. Secondly, specific guidelines are provided to illustrate how the policies are met. Compliance with this guideline must be achieved by meeting the specific measures described in the PUD guidelines. Further compliance with the formal design concepts policy of the Design Objectives Plan is required. The method of compliance is stated as follows within the BDOP. "In many cases, compliance with a guideline can be' achieved by meeting one of the specific measures described in the . "bullet" line. In cases where the specific bullets do not.apply, the guideline statement itself shall, and if that also does not apply, then the policy statement shall be used." (Page 6 BDOP.). Review procedure A hard copy of the PT Land PUD guidelines will be provided with each application to the City of Bozeman planning department. As required by the LIDO, all site plans shall be reviewed by the planning staff. Guideline modifications and updates This plan intentionally contemplates changes as market demand shapes the future .of this property. These guidelines will be revisited for possible adjustments every ten years in conjunction with Bozeman 2020 Community Plan document of the City of Bozeman growth policy. The direction of any adjustments, if necessary, will come from the majority of property owners within the PT Land PUD. 4 PT Land PUD Development Guidelines �;,�� -�-._ � � � •tom- open / M-1 space . c , 13-2 y ope space + Jot lot 4 ` lot 15 /7 f lot 6h'i B-2 ,lot i0V „r ,r lot 3 -- l :C aY0LM�11 lot 2 arm..MOM ® -Service Warehouse Neighborhood Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor ® -Financial Institutions and Services N C Support Services Neighborhood TABLE 1-1 5 PT Land PUD DeveloP ment Guidelines • Chapter 1- Service Warehouse Neighborhood This district is characterized as having design qualities of an industrial warehouse area. Typical to this neighborhood are big trucks, small signs and simple building forms that highlight the functionality of purpose. Businesses generally do not rely on visibility from arterial streets and have a clientele that would travel to the location regardless of the location in town. This neighborhood has added benefit of adjacency to major arterial streets. The neighborhood should be considered a warehousing distribution and light industrial area. It should be noted that the areas within this development are located adjacent to the large storage areas of the Kenyon Noble site. The visibility from the class I and class II entry way corridors is limited or non existent when buildout of all the adjoining land is complete. The design character of this neighborhood is simple building forms. The activities of the businesses are internal and on occasion disrupt traffic for shipments and deliveries. The types of permitted occupancy uses for this neighborhood are shown in table 17A. 1. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Buildings should define intersections with a strong building presence. This can be accomplished by proposing second floor building area at the corners of intersecting streets. B. Building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the . corridor. The specified setback for this neighborhood is 7 feet from front property line. Buildings are allowed to articulate the building envelope for design purposes but in general, 75% of the building envelope shall be located on the building front yard setback(s). The additional 10 feet of open space area as shown on the PUD plan for lots within this neighborhood shall be nodes of open space equal to the area of the open space setback for each lot. As an example, lot 3 of block 3 has 4,911 s.f of additional open space required for the PT Land PUD. This area shall be located to crate an active outdoor space appropriate for the uses in this neighborhood. Additional details relating to nodes of open space are covered within the landscape guidelines. C. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the 7 PT Land PUD DevelopmeRuidelines • minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. 2. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Design a public space to be actively used. The pedestrian presence in this area is limited to the people who work inside each business. The purpose for outdoor public spaces shall be intended for the employees who work inside each business. These spaces are created in the nodes of open space described in the landscape guidelines. 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. The streets adjacent to this neighborhood are adequate for bicycle circulation. The roads generally do not connect with other areas of town and have limited amounts of vehicular traffic coming from street cuts or other difficult traffic patterns that complicate bike travel. B. The sidewalks should be constructed within the City of Bozeman Right-of way-to service pedestrian circulation in this neighborhood. Sidewalks will provide convenient connections for this neighborhood. Additional trails are provided in the open space areas of the PT Land PUD: Major east west travel is accommodated in the financial neighborhood system. 4. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal , 8 PT Land PUD DeveloP ment fuidelines 0 automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Reduce the amount of land required for service vehicle circulation. The internal circulation system of this neighborhood requires accommodating multi axle trucks and delivery trucks to each lot. At the option of any property owner within this neighborhood, any site plan development can use Patrick Lane to provide circulation to loading docks directly from the front of the building. This allowance can reduce the amount of on site development for circulation. B. Reduce the amount of land required for automobile circulation. When mutually agreed between two properties, shared access drives are encouraged. The benefit in sharing drive access is the reduced cost of site development and shared maintenance expenses. C. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. Parking lots along the rear of each property shall connect to allow drive trough traffic from adjoining properties when feasible. 5. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and'safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Parking lot designs shall be located in the rear of each lot with the building occurring in the front. B. Parking isles shall continue to each property boundary to allow for future connections between adjacent properties: C. Parking lots will not be used for permanent or temporary storage of goods or deliveries. The uses of these properties are required to be internal. All activities shall be inside the building. 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. 9 PT Land PUD DevelopmeGuidelines • This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Incorporate the service area as part of the building design. C. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 8. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. A. The buildings shall have an industrial warehouse feel. They should not look like a residential home. The building should look like a place of business. Good examples are located at 600 N Wallace and 342 Gallatin Park. 9. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space. 10 PT Land PUD Developmentidelines • 10. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 11. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. The buildings shall have an average building front between 18' and 25' in height. The building mass should step back from the building footprint if additional height is desired. B. The mass of the roof form shall not be greater then the building walls below. 12. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help promote the scale of the building. For that reason, flat roofs to low pitch roof forms with parapets should. be used in this neighborhood. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop because of the lack of unnecessary roof massing. Consistent roof forms in this neighborhood are also encouraged. A. Building roof forms shall be either parapet walls or false front facades. These roof forms can be accompanied with accent roof forms as a secondary building element. 13. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 11 PT Land PUD Developmelouidelines . . A. The use of metal for building siding is approved as an alternative material. The use of this material must provide a sense of scale by breaking the simple building mass into distinct building volumes or varied building layers. B. The use of wood should be avoided. Maintenance of the buildings is a concern. Products that.can weather without a high level of upkeep should be used in place of wood. 14. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 15. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 16. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure blend with the natural setting and reduce its perceived scale. 17. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new .construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. All electrical and communication utilities shall placed underground. Chapter 2- Financial Institutions and Services Neighborhood 12 PT Land PUD Developmentidelines • The intent of this neighborhood is self explanatory. The allowable uses in this district are described in table 1-B and are located in the areas depicted in table 1-1. This district requires visibility from Oak Street because the tenants rely on recognition of their businesses from the major arterial roads. The character of the neighborhood communicates the business of banking to passing motorists. The building should act as a sign. The building should be visible within a green way landscape. The architectural details should express a sense of permanence. Compact site design should allow for efficient land use that looks towards future redevelopment over time. The buildings should exist in a green way setting that allows for distant views of the Bridger mountains beyond. 1. Views Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. B. A building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. The setback is in compliance with the green way along Oak Street. C. Building shall be positioned to allow for additional redevelopment or future expansion on each lot. Through efficient use of existing road infrastructure and building on the 13 PT Land PUD Developmeaidelines minimum yard setbacks, the amount of land necessary to conduct business on each lot can be minimized. 3. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link .the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 14 PT Land PUD DevelopmenOidelines • 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If-the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel. road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. 15 PT Land PUD Developmesuidelines 0 A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy:. Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. 16 PT Land PUD DevelopmenOidelines • B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be.at . least 20% of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop. Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged, B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural . setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. B. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 16. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 17 PT Land PUD DevelopmeSuidelines 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure blend with the natural setting and reduce its perceived scale. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized. Chapter 3- Support Services Neighborhood This district helps the financial and hospitality and regional anchor neighborhood with a supply of.services or people to make the overall commercial corridor successful. The success of the support services neighborhood is directly dependant on the vitality of the anchor neighborhood. This ,relationship of mutually beneficial land use will create a sense of neighborhood by providing a customer base for each other. The character of this neighborhood is primarily two story or more buildings that have a mix of uses. The second and subsequent floors will provide additional office space or apartment living units. Internal connections of pedestrian circulation and vehicular access are required between the. anchor neighborhood and support services neighborhood The types of permitted uses are described in table 1- C and a located in the areas depicted in table 1-1. 1. Views Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. 18 PT Land PUD DevelopmentlTC�idelines • C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. 3. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties. is encouraged. A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems 19 PT Land PUD Develop meluidelines Policy: ' This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulation systems which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient.internal automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. 20 PT Land PUD Developmenflidelines • B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road .. conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking lot. The landscaping of the parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes., and mechanical- equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area,-and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11. Street Level Interest Policy: 21 PT Land PUD Developmeluidelines • When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20% of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop. Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. A. Using sloping roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and.wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 22 PT Land PUD Develop menoidel ines • 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 16. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure blend with the natural setting and reduce its perceived scale. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized Chapter 4- Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighborhood The area included in this district is held in one large lot and is highly visible from Interstate 90 and Baxter Lane. The lot size is large enough for a hotel convention center or a national retailer. Property with this kind of exposure to the highway and access to arterial street networks will allow for regional retail exposure or hotel uses that will be successful in this location. This location is adjacent to the open space area of enhanced wetland and watercourse features. Trails and access to the public exist in this area. 1. Views 23 PT Land PUD DevelopmeWdelines Policy: Views from the public way to natural features also should be maintained. Therefore, view opportunities should be identified for all major site developments. Significant views may occur from major public open spaces, street intersections, bridges and roadway overlooks. A. Enhance views from the public way to scenic natural features and Landmarks. B. Locate a building to maintain key views as they are seen from the public way. C. Site buildings in relation to adjoining properties to frame a view as it may be observed from public rights-of-way. Avoid completely blocking such a view with a large building mass. 2. Building Placement Policy: Buildings should be sited to respect development patterns that are identified in the design objectives for the area, such as the orientation of structures to the street, alignment of building fronts and setbacks, relationship to neighboring properties, as well as the location of buildings at major intersections. A. Where two or more buildings will be located in a major site development, arrange them in a cluster to define outdoor spaces. B. A building shall be positioned to fit within the general setback patterns specified for the corridor. 3. Outdoor Public Spaces Policy: The development of outdoor public spaces should be encouraged in order to enhance the site as a place for pedestrians. Buildings and other site functions should be planned to create outdoor public spaces, and the development of space that can be shared among properties is encouraged. 24 PT Land PUD Developmenflidelines A. Develop an outdoor public space as a focal point for the site. B. Design a public space to be actively used. 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Systems Policy: Pedestrians and bicyclists should have safe, convenient access to the various functions of a site; therefore, a coordinated pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that fits the character of the site should be provided. A. Link the various functions and spaces on a site with pedestrian ways in a coordinated system. 5. Internal Automobile Circulation Systems Policy: This section focuses on the design of streets and driveways within a major site development. Related guidelines addressing how these systems link to those on abutting properties appear in the Neighborhood Design chapter. Note that all site plans must provide circulations stems P Y which meet the city's street engineering standards. A continuous, safe, and convenient internal automobile circulation system should be provided. The hierarchy of differing levels of use should be clearly apparent in the roadway designs. A. Minimize the number of curb cuts onto a public street along a property edge. B. Provide a continuous circulation system within a property. 6. Site Lighting Policy: Standards for outdoor lighting are provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. This section addresses some of the qualitative aspects of lighting design that should also be addressed. Site lighting should be designed to facilitate safe and convenient circulation of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Light levels should be sufficient for safety. However, light spill onto adjacent properties and into the night sky should be minimized. The light level at the property line is a key design consideration. i 25 PT Land PUD Developmeeuidelines This is affected by the number of fixtures, their mounting height, and the lumens emitted per fixture. 7. Parking Lots Policy: The visual impacts of parking areas should be minimized and large expanses of parking lots should be avoided. Using on-street and shared parking arrangements should be considered to accommodate some parking needs as well. A parking lot should be designed so it will provide efficient vehicular circulation and safe pedestrian circulation within the site, while minimizing the visual impacts of cars. A. Minimize the negative visual impacts of cars parked on site. A single parking area shall not exceed one acre in size. If the total .parking area of a project exceeds one acre, it shall be divided into a series of separate lots. B. Use shared drives to access parking areas, when feasible. Avoid parallel road conditions, in which two abutting properties have separate driveways. Provide cross- property easements to share driveways and reduce the need for additional curb cuts, when feasible. 8. Utilities and Service Areas Policy: Service areas should be visually unobtrusive and should be integrated with the design of the site and the building. A. The location of utilities shall be located between the building and the parking..lot. The landscaping of the.parking areas shall screen the utility services. Trash enclosure, as well as ground level equipment such as transformers, satellite dishes, and mechanical equipment, are to be screened from public view through landscaping, .fencing or finished walls that complement the building design. B. Position service areas to minimize conflict with other abutting uses. Do not locate above ground utilities or service areas along rear property lines. 9. Building Character Policy: 26 PT Land PUD Development�uidelines • Buildings should reflect the regional urban character. 10. Primary Building Entrance Policy: The primary entrance of a structure should orient the street, parking area, and other outdoor public green space nodes. A. The primary entrance to a building shall have a human scale. 11. Street Level Interest Policy: When a building is located close to a street or walkway, it should be designed to provide interest to pedestrians. For example, commercial buildings with storefronts are of interest to passersby. These features encourage pedestrian activity and should be used whenever feasible. • 12. Building Mass and Scale Policy: A building should appear to have a "human scale." In general, this can be accomplished by using familiar forms and elements that can be interpreted in human dimensions. A. Change material or color with each building module to reduce the perceived mass. B. Change the height of a wall plane or building module. The change in height shall be at least 20% of the vertical height. C. Change roof form to help express the different modules of the building mass and, D. Change the arrangement of windows and other facade articulation features, such as columns or strap work that divides large wall planes into smaller components. 13. Roof Form Policy: The primary roof form of a structure should help reduce the perceived scale of the building. For • that reason, sloping roofs should be used in most contexts. These also will help the building fit into the mountain backdrop. Varied roof forms in the appropriate context are also encouraged. 27 PT Land PUD Developmetuidelines • A. Usin 'slo in roof forms to reduce the perceived scale of a building is encouraged. 9 p 9 p 9 B. Varying roof forms is encouraged. C. Providing variety in ridge line height is encouraged. 14. Building Materials Policy: Materials that reduce the perceived mass of a building and appear to blend with the natural setting should be used. Traditionally, brick and stone were used, and wood and stucco also appeared. This tradition should be continued. Alternative materials may also be considered, when they convey a human scale in their detailing. 15. Building Complex Policy: Buildings within a development should exhibit a unity of design. A. Building unity should exist within each neighborhood. 16. Service Canopies Policy: A gas station service area should appear as a subordinate element in the site design. 17. Color Policy: Building finish colors should help a structure blend with the natural setting and reduce its perceived scale. 18. Utilities and Mechanical Equipment Policy: Utilities and mechanical equipment that serve properties may include telephone'and electrical lines, gas meters, air conditioners, telecommunication systems and security systems. For new • 28 PT Land PUD Developmenflidelines construction, adequate space should be planned in a project from the outset and should be designed such that visual impacts are minimized • 29 PT Land PUD Developmetuidelines • Landscape .Guidelines The landscape design for the PT Land Planned Unit Development will comply with the City of Bozeman's Unified Development Ordinance, Design Objectives Plan, and the landscape requirements as defined by the PT Land PUD Development Guidelines. The landscape design contributes significantly to the Oak Street corridor. Wide landscape buffers are designed to tie this development to others in the area and provide comfortable open space for pedestrian circulation. Plant selections submitted with this Site Plan shall provide the development with a sense of unity internally as well as compliment surrounding developments. The design shall provide a variety of experiences for community members by providing pedestrian pathways along the streetscape and along the stream/wetland corridor in the northwest and northeast corners of the development. The plantings will be combined with berms and swales to create topographical interest and to screen and buffer development from surrounding uses. Large plantings provide easy visual identification of entryways. The specific design guidelines as defined below may be altered within the framework of this PUD based on design merit and with the requirement being that the overall concept must be maintained throughout the development and the landscape points must be attained. Landscaping on each lot must meet or exceed the minimum requirements outlined in the zoning ordinance in order to achieve the higher quality of design expected with a PUD. These requirements are outlined in the North 19th Avenue/Oak Street Entryway Corridor Plan, which reflect design,intentions for planned unit developments. Due to the project location, this planned unit development must adhere to the Greenway Corridor Landscape Standards. Further, this project will exceed minimum landscape standards. General Landscape Guidelines At this time, landscaping for the PT Land PUD will follow general planting concepts as shown on the proposed Conceptual Landscape Plan. Landscape improvements will include extensive landscaping throughout the project. A primary goal in landscaping of open spaces within the project is to create usable outdoor rooms. Open space from one lot to another shall be located so as to create visual and physical continuity from lot to lot and to create larger green spaces that provide for a variety of outdoor uses. Landscaped spaces shall be integrated with building entries, employee use areas, as well as public use areas. 30 PT Land PUD Developmenuidelines • To reduce or eliminate the dependence on treated city water, on-site wells may be installed for irrigation purposes. Larger tree and shrub plantings, combined with complete irrigation, will be utilized for an immediate landscape impact. Oak Street Frontage Important considerations for this area includes the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by a formal alternating arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall Gold'), Norway Maple (Acer platanoides), Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer freemanii 'Jeffersred'), or other suitable species, at 50-foot intervals along all street frontages. To the inside of this line of trees additional buffering of parking lots will be created by natural, rolling berms planted with groups of Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens), Canada Red Cherry (Prunus virginiana 'Canada Red', Amur Cherry (Prunus maackii) Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides), Brandon Elm (Ulmus 'Brandon') and other suitable species. The yard landscaping points shall be met with groups of large evergreen trees, small ornamental trees and large canopy trees for each 50 lineal feet, in addition to the street trees. Turf grass would be present around these plantings. The plantings and berms present in the greenway create a variety of visual experiences for pathway users. All plantings shall be placed with consideration as to path use • and safety, visibility into the parking lot for security personnel, view corridors, terminated vistas, and appropriate screening for the adjacent developments. Plant selection ties to the Bridger Peaks development by repeating the use of the Black Ash as street trees but creates variety and a unique identity by using Amur Cherry and Canada Red Cherry. Creativity shall be encouraged in the plantings, and entrance focal points will be created. In these cases, clusters of evergreen and deciduous shrubs, perennial flowers, and boulders may be used to assist in creating focal point plantings. Patrick Street , Tschache Lane, and North 11 th Frontage Primary consideration for these areas include the requirement of the formal streetscape. This will be provided by a formal alternating arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall.Gold'), Norway Maple (Acer platanoides), .Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer freemannii), or other suitable species, at 50-foot intervals along all street frontages. Baxter Lane Landscaping This landscape buffer will enhance visual perception of the development from Interstate 90. Baxter Lane will be lined with a formal street tree arrangement of Black Ash (Fraxinus nigra 'Fall 31 PT Land PUD Developmenfidelines • Gold') or other suitable species. The large expanse of greenspace will utilize evergreen trees, �. deciduous trees and rolling berms to create a park-like setting. The plant palette may include Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra), Colorado Spruce (Picea gungens), Quaking Aspen (Po ulus tremuloides), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Canada Red Cherry (Prunus virginiana `Canada Red'). Stream Corridor The steam corridors in the northwestern and northeastern corners of the property will be afforded significant setback and may be buffered from the development by berms, landscaping and other appropriate means. A pathway is planned for the northeast area to allow pedestrian access from the development as well as adjacent properties. Plantings should be limited to native species of trees and shrubs to enhance the riparian nature of the corridor. The planting of native grasses is also encouraged in this area. It is desirable to leave the native grasses unmown thereby enhancing the feel of a natural stream bank community.. Interior ParkingLo The parking lot layout shall provide for traffic control, shading and pedestrian access. Japanese • Tree Lilac (Syringa reticulata), Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), and Prairie Spire Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Rugby') are trees that may be utilized in the parking lot islands. Planting of islands with a variety of shrubs to provide screening and traffic control will also be included. Pedestrian Use Areas Pedestrian access shall be provided throughout the development. Concrete walks are to be provided along. Baxter Lane, Patrick Street, North 111h, North 14th, North 15tt', and Tschache Lane with lateral extensions into the site. The 8 foot wide asphalt trail shall be continued along Oak Street. A minimum 6-foot wide pedestrian path shall be provided along the stream to the east. This path shall meet the requirements for city standard natural fines trails. A primary pedestrian access shall be provided through the site and shall consist of concrete sidewalks and at-grade marked pedestrian crossings connecting on site entry points, pedestrian destinations and off site developments. Building Envelope • 32 0 PT Land PUD Develop mentOidelines • Building envelopes will include plantings to soften and enhance the architecture, and sufficiently screen service and utilities from the street. General locations for these plantings shall be determined through Site Plan Review and shown on a landscape plan. Materials shall include some of the species used in the overall development, but some variety will be allowed for individual expression and identity. A landscape plan will be required for these pad sites. The landscape design provides a strong unifying element to the overall design of the development. *All plant varieties suggested are to act as a guideline. As new, improved cultivars are developed variation from the listed varieties will be allowed. Submitted by Shelly Engler, Landscape Architect, Cashman Nursery & Landscaping, May 29, 2006. • 33 PT Land PUD Developmetuidelines • Sign Design Criteria Guidelines • The PT Land Property is proposed to be a B-2 zone. It is the intent of this proposed PT Land Property Planned Unit Development to follow existing regulations within the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance as described within the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) and the B-2 District as part of the Planned Unit Development process to completion. However, because of the lot configurations and their locations adjacent to proposed streets, 1-90 interstate and Oak Street, certain lots will be provided other considerations under the UDO. These considerations include proposed lots adjacent to the Oak Street Entryway Overlay Corridor on Oak Street, lots adjacent to Interstate 90 will fall under the Interchange Zone. And lots locations not adjacent to Oak Street or the Interstate and adjacent to 15th street will follow general B-2 District zone regulations. It is accepted that all lots will be allowed an free-standing pole or monument type sign, wall signs, projecting signs and directional signs as prescribed within the B-2 district zoning regulations. Other than directional signs, all signs will be allowed to be illuminated by internal or external lighting. The following is a brief summary of B-2 district Sign Ordinance Regulations. A lot in a B-2 district is permitted total signage not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet. A comprehensive sign plan is required for all commercial centers consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces on a lot. B-2 District- General Regulations: 1) Freestanding signs. One freestanding sign is permitted per zoned lot. Freestanding signs may be a pole-style or low profile monument style. The maximum area for a free standing sign is thirty-two (32) square feet. Set back distance and clearance will be as described with the City of Bozeman Sign Ordinance. Lighting, either internal or by external means is permitted. 2) Wall signs. Wall signs are not to exceed a total allowance of one and one half (1.5) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage. minus any area devoted to freestanding or projecting signs. Canopy, window, and awning signs will be classified as wall signs. Lots fronting on two or more streets shall be permitted an additional thirty-five (35) percent of the already permitted wall sign area for each subsequent building frontage. 3) Projecting signs. One projecting sign per tenant. Projecting signs shall not exceed eight (8) square feet nor extend more than four (4) feet from the building and maintain a minimum clearance of eight(8). i 34 PT Land PUD DevelopmenRuidelines Lots adjacent to Interstate 1-90: Lots adjacent to the Interstate fall under Interchange Zone. Each lot shall be permitted one freestanding sign which may include either a (a) low profile type sign or a (b) pole-style type sign. General B-2 zoning regulations apply for all other type of signs (wall, projecting, window and etc). A) Low Profile signs: The maximum area for a low profile sign shall be 40 square feet. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 5 feet with a maximum height of 8 feet. B) Pole type signs: A pole type freestanding sign shall be setback a minimum of 15 feet and will maintain at least an 8 foot minimum vertical distance. Poles style signs shall not exceed a total area of 40 square feet or 16 feet in height, provided however, that for every 2 feet said sign is set back from 15 feet beyond the street right-of-way, the height measured at grade may be increased by 1 foot, not to exceed a total of 32 square feet, and the area may be increased by 2.5 square feet for every 2 feet that said sign is set back 15 beyond the street right-of-way up to a maximum of 120 square feet. Lots adjacent to Oak Street Overlay District: Lots to Oak Street fall under Oak Street Ent Overlay District as described within 'adjacent _Entryway Y the City of Bozeman Design Objectives Plan and the B-2 district. Proposed lots along Oak Street will be one permitted one freestanding sign per lot. . Pole style or monument will be considered. Wall signs and projecting signs will be allowed. Sign materials should be compatible with that of the building architectural elements. Signs should compliment the lot configuration and building location on the lot. Lighted signs will be permitted. Sign backgrounds to be designed to allow graphic to read effectively without white backgrounds. The use of symbols rather than copy is encourage when appropriate. Lots adjacent to North 15th Street and North 11th and between Patrick Tschache Lane: The lots falling in between the Interchange Zone and Oak Street Overlay District will follow general B-2 district sign code regulations as described within The City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. For complete Sign Code Regulations refer to Chapter 18.52 of the Unified Development Ordinance: Sign Design Criteria Guidelines Summary It is the intent of the guidelines to serve as a tool • for sign design, fabrication and installation location on lots of the PT Land Property Planned Unit 35 PT Land PUD Development idelines Development. For specific details, reference is to be made City of Bozeman Design Objectives . Plan, Unified Development Ordinance and B-2 district zoning sign ordinances. 36 ATable 1-A ]Service Warehouse Neighboorhood Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Ambulance service P Apartments and Apartment b0cilings,-second and subsequent upper floors only P NOTE 1 Arts and entertainment center,as defined In this title P Assisted living/elderly care facilities Automobile fuel sales or repair,as defined In this ttde P Automobile parking lot or garage(public or private) P Automobile washing establishment P Banks and other financial institutions Business,technical or vocational school Bus terotnais P Community centers Convenience uses Convenience use restaurant Day care centers Essential services T I P Essential services(Type II) Extended-stay lodgings Food processing facilities P Frozen food storage and locker rental P Health and exercise establishments Hospitals Hotel or motel Laboratories,research and diagnostic Laundry,dry cleaning Light goods repair,as defined In this title P • Lodging houses Manufacturing fight and completely Indoors Mortuary Museum Medical and dental clinics Meeting hall Offices,as defined In this title P Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses A Parking facilities P Personal and convenience services,as defined in this title Pet grooming shop PdntN,offices and publishing establishments P Private club,fraternity,sorority or lodge Public buildings Refuse and recycling containers P Research laboratories P Restaurants Retail uses as defined in this title P NOTE 2 Retail,large scale Sales of alcohol for on-premise consumption Sign paint strops(not including neon sign fabrication) P Upholstery shops P Veterinary clinic P distributors with on-premise retail outlets,providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the promises P esa ens use samples, not stock on promises P Notes: P-permitted use as described in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 1-When located on the second or subsequent floor. 2-Excluding adult businesses,and large scale retail,as they are defined in Chapter 18.80,BMC. 0 Table 1-B Financial Institutions and Services Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Ambulance service Apartments and Apartment buildings,'second and subsequent upper floors only NOTE 1 Rs and entertainment center,as defined in this title Assisted living/elderly care facilities Automobile fuel sales or repair,as defined in this title Automobile washing establishment lBustenrminals Convenience uses Convenience use restaurant Day care center; Essential services(Type II) Extended-stay lodgings Food processing facilities Frozen food storage and locker rental Health and exercise establishments Hospitals Hotel or motel Laundry,dry cleaning Light goods repair,as defined in this title Lodging houses Manufacturing,light and completely indoors Mortuary Museum Meeting hall Personal and convenience services,as defined in this title Pet grooming shop Printing offices and publishing establishments Private club,fraternity,sorority or lodge Research laboratories Restaurants Retail,large scale Sales of alcohol for on-premise consumption Sign paint shops(not including neon sign fabrication) Upholstery shops Veterinary clinic Wholesale distributors with on-premise retail outlets,providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises Wholesale establishments that use samples,but do not stock on premises Notes: P-permitted use as described in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 1-When located on the second or subsequent floor. is 2-Excluding adult businesses,and large scale retail,as they are defined in Chapter 18.80,BMC. C Table 1-C Support Services Neighborhood Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Ambulance service Apartments and Apartment buildings,'second and subsequent upper floors only P NOTE 1 Arts and entertainment center,as defined In this title Assisted living/eldedy care facilities Automobile fuel sales or repair,as defined in this title Automobile parking lot or garage(public or private) P Automobile washing establishment Banks and other financial institutions P Business,technical or vocational school Bus terminals Community centers P Convenience uses P Convenience use restaurant P Day care centers P Essential services(Type 1) P Essential services(Type II) Extended-stay lodgings Food processing facilities Frozen food storage and locker rental Health and exercise establishments P—� Hospitals Hotel or motel Laboratories,research and diagnostic Laundry,dry cleaning Light goods repair,as defined in this title Lodging houses Manufacturing,light and completely indoors Mortuary P Museum P Medical and dental clinics P Meeting hall Offices,as defined In this title P Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses A Parking facilities P Personal and convenience services,as defined in this title P Pet grooming shop P Printing offices and publishing establishments Private club,fraternity,sorority or lodge Public buildings Refuse and recycling containers P Research laboratories P Restaurants P Retail uses,as defined In this title P :N]OTE2 Retail,large scale P Sales of alcohol for on-premise consumption P Sign paint shops(not including neon sign fabrication) Upholstery shops Veterinary clinic P—� Wholesale distributors with on-premise retail outlets,providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises Wholesale establishments that use samples,but do not stock on premises P Notes: P-permitted use as described in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. • 1-When located on the second or subsequent floor. 2-Excluding adult businesses,and large scale retail,as they are defined in Chapter 18.80,BMC. D Table 1-D Hospitality and Regional Anchor Neighbor Table of Authorized Commercial Uses Authorized Uses Ambulance service Apartments and Apartment buildings,'second and subsequent upper floors only NOTE 1 Arts and entertainment center,as defined In this title P Assisted living/elderty care facilities Automobile fuel sales or repair,as defined in this title P Automobile parking lot or garage(public or private) P Automobile washing establishment P Banks and other financial institutions Business,technical or vocational school Bus terminals Community centers P Conveniencs uses P Convenience use restaurant P Day cm centers P Esserdlal swvices Type 1) P Essential services(Type II) Extended-stay lodgings P Food processing facilities Frozen food storage and locker rental Health and exercise establishments Hospitals Hotel or motel P Laboratories,research and diagnostic Laundry,dry cleaning a Light goods repair,as defined in this title Lodging houses P Manufacturing,light and completely indoors Mortuary Museum P Medical and dental clinics Meeting hall P Offices,as de lined In this We P Other buthitnps and structures typically accessory to permitted uses A Parking facilities P Personal and convenience services,as defined in this title Pet grooming shop Printing offices and publishing establishments Private club,fraternity,sorority or lodge Public buildings P Refuse and recycling containers P Research laboratories Restaurants P Retail uses,as defined in this fide NOTE 2 Retail,large scale P Sales of alcohol for on-promise consumption P Sign paint shops(not including neon sign fabrication) Upholstery shops Veterinary clinic Wholesale distributors with on-premise retail outlets,providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises Wholesale establishments that use samples,but do not stock on premises Notes: P-permitted use as described in the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance. 1-When located on the second or subsequent floor. 2-Excluding adult businesses,and large scale retail,as they are defined in Chapter 18.80,BMC. • • x �a c a a Q' • • :. 90" 5Q32 . FT. 36' �. SIGNAGE :L 1 15'1 OVERALL - HEIGHT '- DOUBLE FACE FREESTANDING ID/PYLON OPTION PAINT FINI5H.METAL CA13INET5&.RETAINERS APPLY 3M FILM GRAPHIC5 ON FOLYCARBONATE FACES INTERNAL ILLUMINATION HO LAMPS 10"CHARACTER AMBER LED TIME&TEMPERATURE D15PLAY STAINED&EXTERIOR FINISH'GLUE-LAM BEAM &BRACE TO MATCH BUILDING DETAILS ... .. MOUNT ON STEEL UPZIGHT5 IN DIRECT BURY FOUNDATION(5) &GROUND PAD(5)/POU RE P:CONCRETE PYLONS: OR FRAMED WITH =: MA50NRY UNDERLAYMENT SHEATHING' STONE OR CULTURED 5TONE VENEER TO MATCH BUILDING: : +uco�itig n&g qlia 40N13m2/tu1L,dw NELENA MISSOULA BUTTE BOZEMAN 2707 Broadwater Ave. Helena, W 59601 (406) 443-4172 (406)728-6899 .(406)723-4788 (406) 587-8580 E-MAIL: maw®mt.net The proposed display is subject design no. client designer to local or dinancea.Signwiring 19506 AMEKICAN FEDERAL 5AVING5 BANK J. 5CHULLEK standard aryoetletric anndlfinahaee. scale ii d + n location 50ZEMAN, MT salsa hookup by others. 3/8 —•�_O- : 'CjATHER • This design is the property of the date manufacturer and all rights to Its - client approval •- -- - - use or reproduction are reserved. 6/26/06 • • • • �I �I i � � I � � I� �t • { �� 1 I , • 9611 - - -- T 12" Y e r - - - 671 -� T T D 12 r � a � J � D SINGLE FACE ID/BUILDING 51GNATURE5 PAINT FIN15H 5EM1 GLO55 ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE '/4"ALUMINUM PLATE 13ACKGROUND5 51AND OFF MOUNT''/4' 13RU5HED ALUMINUM FIN15H CUT OUT(ROUTED) LETTER5 MOUNT ON 5TONE"BUTTKE55E5"BELOW BEAM &BRACE WORK �Y Mom= Aggmal ENTRANCE 13UTTKE55 -WE5T ELEVATION REAR 13UTTKE55-5OUTH ELEVATION ]f>ffjS�(QLLfR IIISOmiiY/MmkW59601 e �� 106I6it711/E.NIOjidmq�ninl HELENA 2707 sroadwaterAve. MISSOULA BUTTE BOZEMAN Helena, MT 59601 (406)443-4172 (406)728-6899 (406)723-4788 (406) 587-8580 E-MAIL: nlsw@mt.net The proposed display le eub]eet design no, client designer tolocap:s' ncee.Sigggnwiring 19506 AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK J. 5CHULLER :standard Primary yelectric a sin nd'finahaee. scale location BOZEMAN MT sales hookup by others. 3/8" 116, = 1'-0" 5ATHEK This design is the properly of the manufacturer and all rights to its client approval date 6/26/06 ,ee or reproduction are reserved. W LLJ N ~ N' 96" . 48°. . Q <p 32 :.. SQ.-FT. ..... .. ... ..... ...... 51GNAGE . .. . my • co n _ � Z Q - ? m �. O FN T ILNf ro w Q o o � w w LL N Q m. DOUBLE:FACE FREESTANDING ID/ MONUMENT OPTION flL 20 PAINT.FINI5H:METAL CABINETS&:RETAINERS oW E CL APPLY3M FILM GRAPHIC5.ON POLYCARDONATE_FACES daa m Q = � o INTERNAL ILLUMINATION.HO LAMPS 38" . N=vw o 12"CHARACTER AMBER LED:TIME&TEMPERATURE DISPLAY.. : .STAINED&EXTERIOR FINI5H:GLUE-LAM BEAM &BRACE _:: • IN _ - TO MATCH'BUILDING DETAILS �: :� � 5'-p° W• � MOUNT ON STEEL UPRIGHTS IN DIRECT BURY FOUNDATION OVERALL W- - &.GROUND PAD I POUREP:CONCRETE MONUMENT BASE'-: I HT _HEIG ORFKAMED'WITH MA50NKY UNDERLAYMENT�5HEATHING V STONE OR CULTURED STONE VENEER=TO MATCH'BUILDING 8 ��m sum .. .. _. m=� m e- R_l �a$ca . .. goNt$��2 vmoe E noa� • • I TWO EACH Exit Only ONE ONLY �24" Entrance ONE ONLY 12 Parking I T 1 � I DOUBLE FACE FREESTANDING DIRECTIONAL5 FOUR DIRECTIONAL5 TOTAL PAINT FIN15H 5EM1 GLO55 ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE METAL P05T &PANEL 51GN5 WITH 50LID RETURNS APPLY 3M REFLECTIVE FILM COPY&ARROWS 5Q.TUBE STEEL MOUNT WITH OPTION TO ADD STONE OR CULTURED STONE 13A5E5 TO MATCH BUILDING:DETAIL ]fff�S.�C�flUllf.R 4S443 i 2 EARy kig.0 tE01 IONI}t712/E�tIR1��9dQd+d HELENA 2 07' ee adwat MT oie. MISSOULA BUTTE BOZEMAN Hele(406)443-4172 (406)728-6899 (406)723-4788 (406) 587-8580 E-MAIL: rnsw@mt.net The proposed display Is subject d8S19""°'19506 °liens AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK deb Jne�CHULLER to local ordinances.Sign wring eten�mary0electric an lfinaheee. scale ii — r_ ii location sales hookup by others. '/2 — 1 0 BOZEMAN, MT SATHER This design is the property of the manufacturer and all rights to Its client approval date -126106 use or reproduction are reserved. • • t f , �i • 1 � � � ' h� it 1'r I� � � I � I Il • 1 � i� � i I , �` I 1�1 F f ~1- ,x • C IN �Q :Q • 1 Preliminary Plat ENGINEERS • � MORMtN- SURVEYORS �J PLANNERS SCIENTISTS MMERLE, INC. 3011 PALMER STREET•MISSOULA,MT 59808.406-542-WO•FAX 406.541.0009 An Employee-Owned Company June 27, 2007 Lanette Windemaker City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 D c Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Subject: PT Land PUD#Z-06230 °E�,.,;: AND CG'�v' v •,t ";;u,Vh1`G 1"LOPMENr Dear Lanette, Attached for your review is the Planned Unit Development application submittal for PT Land PUD. This package includes the following information: 1. Final PUD Criteria Binder a. PUD application b. Conditions of approval c. Response to conditions of approval with supplemental information d. Development Guidelines e. Final Planned Unit Development Plan f. Landscape Plans 2. Application Fee of$500 Infrastructure drawings have already been submitted to Engineering. Please feel free to contact me at 542-8880 if you have any questions during your review. Thank you for your assistance and I look forward to your comments. Sincerely, Morrison-Maierle, Inc. W f rlf JUL-.,li,i - :fly=; IlySkorpik, E ��� � �' .,_�s; �-710" r.�a, c__ 1 i?_ ;. troject Manager " ,. 11F'_.11 o D D-F RI11-. 1. 1E9 't. F}. cc: Jerry Perkins �'�� r F: :,►T a._�F; F yj 5I Dave Hutchinson 1. File `-C:r �E;;- s io.00 Enclosures as listed above. MA3 VeBeAWindemaker062707.doc V106, ® MORRISON EILL MAIERLE, INC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL An Employee-Owned Company 3011 Palmer Street Date: August 13, 2007 ��\ Missoula, MT 59808 Job Number: 3948.004 O Phone: 406 542- ( ) 8880 Attention. Lanette Wlndem er 'LO Fax: (406) 542-4801 RE: PT Land Development To: City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59715 We are sending you the following: E Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Cody of Letter ❑ Change Letter Copies Date Number Description Revised PT Land Final PUD Plat Application with 7 08/07 Response to Review Comments (see Tab — Correspondence These are transmitted as checked below: E For approval ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Su:)mit specified item E For your use ❑ Make corrections noted ❑ Prints returned after loan to us ❑ As requested ❑ Revise and resubmit ❑ For your files ❑ For review and comments ❑ Rejected Remarks: Copy: File Signed: Sheila Fauth If enclosures are not as noted, please advise. HAAdmin\Letter of Transmittal 00 5 OWNER : K` \ PT LAND e 511 NORTH WALLACE AVENUE BOZEMAN, MT 59715-3757 y aommul Ct. °p ®�w ENGINEER MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. Z 90 r1 \. 3011 PALMER STREET PROJECT n,m.w v L x / \ W-5-04 MISSOULA, MT 59808 AREA SITE PLAN APPLICANT OF LOT 1,BLOCK 1 »» AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK 606 NORTH 7TH AVE. BOZEMAN, MT 59715 - � 406-586-0251zw o 1". Fl k , t/•' s- �. �'1�T VICINITY MAP x •: TITS W-4-04 SPACE) 279,267 sq.ft. /j 6.41 acres � L 1 \ I B-2 _ +" \ , `�1�51acrrest �� -- j fir,, -Da (OPEN SP?"E) PHASE 5, 1n,aso sq.ff. vI} \ ! DETENTION POND \ ♦ II x ]I 12.70 acres 1 F 1 x✓ -� / �� / j j I \ \ \ DETENTION POND `1 f\ y 1 I .*_. ..-k 6H _- - -7-04 $ .j / ` � j 'x 40,962 sq.ft % 4 \ \ - o-J 32;686��q fyr 0.94 acres `6t�60 sq.ft.\\, l \ 6 � q\ 0:75 acreB 1.41�acres 51,850 sq.ft 71,15�•s ft. ` ✓ _ 19 acre 1:rZ3 acres % ��� i w _PHAS 3 f I 10'OPEN SPACE -� f _~`�'t / '0 P ASE, 4 7 BUllalur SACK '} 42,887 sq.ft:r\ � 4\ z ` J i B-� - -0:9$acres 44,759 sq.ft. - BT 3 \ `Z _..II I l 1.03 acres ( _ \ �1,557 sq.ft ~h'\51,886`sd:ft. / 71,321�sq.ft. \ �- -- acres -- _ \ 1. 9 acres --- 1.64 acres .n 1 \P A E. 2 '�- PATRICK, -- �I 37,149 sq:ft 36,982 sq.ft. I 0.85 acres 0.85 acresiv _ I � ��-`, i� -�-"�\ �-�-•- \ II-I} B pOti PEE -i .. - ---�-- I KENY N-NCJBLE� = l VILLAGE' -4 APPROXIM,TE Ili a - - \LER LOCATION OFi{ jf = 37.376 s ft. r f q• 3�,149 sq:ft. 0.86.pcires-- ffi 0.85 acres - - �I PHI E' 1 i - \ '� I \- _ - SEWER SERVIC/ WAR SERVICE Al EV �DI s = 46 Q54 sq.ft. al .. 1 I IfJ: i�.�,.�_ �111-AMP gi j. r-C'- � (�1, LrTj .� '3.35�acres ti I ,a�. / .$ , -; -� ti - !/ j�l i M 1 ter• _ _. - - - - - _ EX'I- - - -° •�.'rr �>, QAK STREET � 1 LEGEND: Exas s„ i Ex s Ex ss .__.._.._.._. ...�...._.-- I PROPOSED KENYON-NOBLE WATER LINE GENERAL NOTES: - �T exw D(ISTING WATER LINE Ex ss EXISTING SEWER LINE +O EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 1. TYPICAL SECTION (PROPOSED) IS 35' TOP-BACK-OF- CURB TO LOT# BLOCK# GROSS USABLE OPEN SPACE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR TOP-BACK-OF-CURB ON PATRICK STREET AND N. 14TH AVE. '- - ---- -- EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR AREA SPACE REQUIRED TOTAL BUILDING GREENWAY WETLAND/ OTHER -X EXISTING FENCE LINE ADJACENT TO KENYON-NOBLE LUMBER. PROVIDED STREAM EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 6 1.01 7 0.14 0.04 - IXISTING OVERHEAD POWER 2 1 - --------- EXISTING CULVERT 2. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF PATRICK STREET, AND N. 14TH AVE. - - M PROPOSED RK�4T-OF-WAY WILL MATCH THE ROADS ADJACENT TO KENYON NOBLE. REFERENCEo.85o7a o.o4 y -w PROPOSED WATER MAIN APPLICATION PACKAGE FOR CROSS-SECTION DETAILS. o.98-S PROPOSED SEWER MAIN o.05 - 0.07 - ® Lo uNE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 3. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF TSCHACHE LANE IS PROPOSED TO N o 7 ze o.15 _ - CURB AND GUTTER BE 37' TOP-BACK-OF-CURB TO TOP-BACK-OF-CURB. 3 1.54 1.43 0.4s 0.20 0.08 - - STREAM 4 _ _ 1.41 i. 4 - - 0 1 WEIAND AREA 4. ALL AREAS LISTED IN TABLE ARE IN ACRES. - - STOJECT BOUNDARY 0.36 0.10 _ .4 PHASE SEWER 5. RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 6.83 ACRES. 1 a 1 .7 DRAINAGE SWALE FT STORM INLET 6. ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING OPEN SPACE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY 0. t 1.11 W-#-O# WETLAND IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 47.62 ACRES. 1.oe 8.59 w WEILAND 7. REFERENCE CITY OF BOZEMAN RECORD DRAWINGS FOR EXISTINGMORRISON � ' GREENWAY SETBACK UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH. EXISTING WATER AT APPROXIMATELY 6.5' 0Fi491" PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN BURY. AMAIERLE,INC. ;aSTREAM/wErtAND GRAPHIC SCALE PT LAND PROPERTY OTHER OPEN SPACE B. REFERENCE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SUBMITTAL BINDER FOR xn ram.aa,t�aM.sw w=.:1wq s,aaees r�lwsl su-1801 LOCATED IN SECTION 1,T 2S,R 5E,P.M.M., SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. 1 pT ) CITY OF B02EMAN,GALLATM COUNTY,MONTANA BUILDING SETBACK CLIENT:PT LAND I Inch- 100 fG 9. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 30$ FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT AND IS (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) FIELD WORK:N/A PLOTTED DATE: Sep/13/2006 DATE:07/26/O6 NOT TO BE PROPORTIONALLY DISTRIBUTED FOR EACH LOT. DRAWN BY: MJO SCALE:1"=100' DRAWING NAME: M:\3946\004\A<atl\aile plan\PRELIMINARY PUD PINJ.Awg CHECKED BY-MRS PROJ #-.3948.004 SHEET 1-OF I- SHEET NOTES 1. ALL LIGHTING IS CONTROLED BY PHOTO CELL VIA LIGHTING CONTACTOR. 2. PER BOZEMAN'S UDO, 18.42.140.C.4.h, THIS LIGHT IS REQUIERD BUT IS NOT IN OUR CONTRACT. r Po M-1 2 (OPEN SPACE) 279.267 eq.R 0.41 aern I B-2 fT, 555.601,rest. � 12.75 _ m 3 (OPEN SPACE) 117,480 ul.ft, 2]D scree E E1 El 3 LOT L Sz6a.q•n 2 oea agree 62 '; Lo a 5 I O 0.75 1.41 acres 1.,Y acres acre F�y ry 61,609 a ft. 51,850.,.1L 1.8J A� E1 - 7,.,5,.9.h. ; I B_2 G�'S bg 1 E1 E1 I e 4ze9]N-mL07 3 4 3 : I B-2 098 acres M.759 eq.ft. LOT 7 '[JO G 1.03 oche 81•�7 eq.it 51,886 aq.fL 1LOT 9 acres 1.19 acres 1.84 ocree 71.321 aq.fL E1 E1 E1 E1 El E1 E1 I B-2 4 L30T 10 I I 3]�,�1T49 eq.f, 38,982 84.fL I O.BS-1— El 0.85 ee ee a � E .E 37,376 eq.R I 37.149 eq.fL -{ 0:6�c1i e I 0. LOT 13° • E1 L- — II III E1 146,054.q.fL El 1 LaOTTS14 I . "........""..."."."... .. "..". . - - - - _ .. ....."....".""".. . . ... .. ... " •"•"• -" """ OAK9T9EET � I SEE SHEET NOTE 2. EXISTING FIXTURE A V ('1__�FIXTURE LAYOUT AND PHOTOMETRICS E_1 SCALE:SEE SCALE BAR PROVIDE FUSE(S) IN CKT. TO LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE BALLAST. FUSE(S) SHALL BE HANDHOLE - 4" X 6" (NOMINAL) SYMBOL OTY FIXTURE TYPE LUMENS DESCRIPTION BUSS TYPE BBS. FUSE HOLDERS 8 E1 32 E1 19260 20OW HPS AT 35 FT SHALL BE BUSS "IRON" HEB THWN CONDUCTOR AS SHOWN ON WATERPROOF. SIZE OF FUSE PLANS. PROVIDE 1' OF COILED IJ E2 2 E2 24300 250W HPS AT 38 FEET SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY SLACK ON CONDUCTOR FEED THRU LUMINAIRE MANUFACTURER. PROJECT ANCHOR BOLTS 3" MIN ABOVE CONNECT GROUND TO TOP OF BASE. PROVIDE DOUBLE NUTS POLE BASE W/BURNDY FOR LEVELING UNIT (ONE ABOVE AND NUMERIC SUMMARY NO. GB4C ONE BELOW BASE FLANGE). GROUT LABEL CALCTYPE UNITS AVG MAX MIN AVG/MIN MAX/MIN BREAKAWAY VOID BETWEEN BASE FLANGE AND TOP STREETS ILLUMINANCE FC 0.51 2.4 0.1 5.1 24.00 ANCHOR BASE OF CONCRETE. LEAVING DRAIN HOLE. AND COVER HAND FINISH. BUSH 1" ISCILINES FOOT CANDLES CONDUITS FINAL in 2.0 1.0 UKAUL 0. REINFORCED EDGE OF CONC. BASE 0'2 CURB OR BY E.C. PAVED AREA ANCHOR BOLTS I SEE PLANS FOR CONDUIT FURNISHED BY DEPTH OF SIZE BRANCH CIRCUIT POLE MANFCTR. EMBED. SEE SCHEDULE 1/2" RIGID CONDUIT FOR GROUND WIRE SEE PLANS FOR CONDUIT NO. 8 THW GREEN SIZE BRANCH CIRCUIT N GROUND WIRE LONG >� REINF. SEE GROUND ROD SCHEDULE CLAMP BURNDY HORIZ TIES. SEE NO. GAR-644C SCHEDULE 5/8" X 8' a, COPPER WELD LIGHT FIXTURE BASE SCHEDULE•�*�� TODD M. K4 GROUND ROD POLE FDN POLE SIZE LONG HORIZONTAL DEPTH *» cRnPTnc saws o FDLEr SIZE. SEE 17296 SCHEDULE HEIGHT STL STLIN FEET 0' - 14' 15"Sq. (4) 5• 3 AT 10°» Lc. 4-0 1 Inch 15150 & 4i NAL 18"4 (6) # 6**** #3 AT 10°o.c. 4'-0° (PRIOR TO REDUMON) 20"S. (4) 7* #3 AT 12°o.c. Y-0" 2�POLEBASE DETAIL 14' — 40' 24° s 6**** 3 AT 12°G.C. 7'-0' MORRISON 22"0 6 6*tek 3 AT 12°o.c. 7-0" 11 ,,�� PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN E-� ".T.s * PROVIDE LONG AT ALL FOUR CORNERS OF SQUARE PIER. `MAIERLE,IpHC. ,�. PT LAND PROPERTY ** PROVIDE SPACING OF S/2 AT TOP 1'-0" OF PEIR. �11Pe1nrm "- "�°°° '^"`('°")"'-°®° (400"M' LOCATED IN SECTION I,T2S,R SE,PM.M., *** DEPTH BELOW FINISHED GRADE. CLIENT:PT LAND **** SPACE LONG. STEEL EVENLY AROUND PERIMETER. PLOTTED DATE: Sep/12/2006 ***** PROVIDE REINF. CLEARANCE PER ANCI 318. FIELD WORK N/A DATE:os/1z/os DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: CDZ SCALE:1"=150' U:\3948\004A35\ACM\Ekmtrioor\UGHRNG P AN.dwg CHECKED BY•TMF PROD#:3948.004.X011 SHEET 1 OF 1 COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES SYMBOLS `X �,•�\ \ \ SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE POPULUS TREMULOIDES 2-2 1/2 40'-50' NA +\x BLACK ASH 2-2 1/2" 40'-50 NA FRAXINUS NIGRA 'FALL GOLD') x\ (ACER MAP +\ 6+ LE 2-2 1/2 40'-50' NA ACER PLAT4NOIDES r\ 2-2 1/2" 60'-70 NA * pp � ® ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON') ,--i r PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED') 2-2 1/2" 25'-30 NA * n� X \ i (S L LA 2 * L� x� � (SYRIRINGA RETICULATA 2-2 1/ " 30'-35 NA F- ® PENNSYLVANAICA RUGBY' 2-2 1/2" 50'-60 NA PRAIRIE S ASH FRAXI x ® (ACER X FREEMANII UEFFERSRED') 2-2 1/2" 40'-50 NA AMUR CHERRY 1"-%" 18'-20 NA PRUNUS MAACKII O AUSTRIAN IN m PIN US NIGRA 8'-IQ' 30'-35' NA * Q rr _ OLORADO SPRUCE 8'-10' 60'-70' NA �C \+ PICEA PUNGENS � 40FLN '-50' NA } �\ (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 2-2 1/2" 7s GOLDEN\x� ® (S LIIX ALWI a V. 'VITELLINA') 2-2 1/2" 40'-50' NA �— x BROOKS POPLAR 2-2 1/2" 40'-50' NA \ POPULUS BROOKS' x\ FMOAL'US INRA IANT' 1"-1)/2" 18'-20 NA x x ® WOODS ROSE 18-24 6-8' NA \ ROSA WOODSII 4- ODOUGLAS HAWTHORN 18-24" 8-12' NA (CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII +\r ; NOTES: ```paN�miiufor''c *\ 1. IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED VIA THE CITY r\ MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM. r\+' 2. NO STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10' OF WATER OR SEWER MAINS. i k � ✓�"iT I FR EXISTI G BUILDING l �4 x� i X ` N Ol O 00 10 N \ I o d� � EXISTING D I N POND e/ � � a m .� I I� I col i REGIONAL DETENTION POND REGIONAL DETENTION POND •® � O O i x Cl m N NUJ 3 kf% - >L - - +— — I ®, I 'I Scale I"-60'-0" EIfW�EIlW Ey W. IXW IXW \ OtW�-FXW IXW IXW EIf IM ! ! W ` IXW IXW IXW IXW 5 IXW- IXW IXW HACHE L s AN s s—ate—s IX IXW IXW I GRAPHIC SCALE IN 1 1 S s IXw s � izo 610 ao o eo s � IN FEET> I \ I I 1 inch— 90 (t. - --- q q 0 0 Q 0 COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES mow" Exw exw Fxww ow w I SYMBOLS SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE s "w ' QUAKING PEN s s s s ^IX cxw Fxw Exw °W A POPULUS TREMULOIDES 2-2 1/2" 40'-50' NA TSCH ACHE s s sw Fw s —s °i FRAXINUSBLACK H NIGRA 'FALL GOLD' 2-2 1/2" 40'-501 NA �w NAORWA MAPLOIDES 2-2 1/2" 40'-50 NA ® (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON-) 2-2 1/2 60'-70 NA I (PRCANUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED') 2-2 1/2" 25'-30 NA * r, JAPANESE TREE - I �w (SYRINGA RETICULATA 2-2 1/2" 30'-35 NA * L0 ® PENNSYLVANAICA 'RUGBY' 2-2 1/2" 50'-60 NA x xJ ® (ACER X FREEMANIILJEFFERSRED') 2-2 1/2" 40'-50 NA �1 ' ru PRUNUSHMAACKII 1"-1Yz" 18'-20 NA * �-i E f" AUSTRIAN PIN (PI NUS NIGRA� 8'-10' 30'-35' NA * /f- OLORADO SPRUCE 8'-10' 60'-70' NA * �L PICEA PUNGENS) ere \ (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 2-2 1/2" 40'-50' NA GOLDEN WILLOW f SALIX ALBA V. 'VITELLINA' 2-2 1/2 40'-50' NA BROOKS POPLAR 2-2 1/2" 40'-50' NA n POPU US 'BROOKS') L� FLOWERING CRAB 1"-1Y2" 18'-20' NA sf MALUS RADIANT' ® WOODS ROSE ROSA WOODSII 18-24" 6-8' NA F w I O DOUGLAS HAWTHORN 18-24" IS-12' CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII I :... s ``alauum�,�i NOTES: :° '•drj.�� 1. IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED VIA THE CITY MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM. �am ate? w �" exw exw Exw _ Fxw- Exw 2. NO STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10' OF PATRICKSTREET w exwxw WATER OR SEWER MAINS. N Z hi I I I L U Q I � � j O W a Ilk z a w s 0 F Z 3 ppww q,y tS'U• � x \ '.s,1'�" 3" yV, y x.• "k.. S7 'I L.fl lO Go O U) f z i� $y s Z CO m — � d m ti \ y 3 0 I ` O z -0 O OO I I it O * N Q * * I N u \o uwN ** 1�,� I -11 Scale I"-60''� � N _ >L BERM Go n i :J cawN^:: C•z Y � � o� n_a +_• '•'_1 t.j nlr n. w - (� GRAPHIC SCALE oiw exw sxw s[c Fxw cxw 12D W d0 o so ieo Exw OAK Exw ow ( IN FEET) r 1 inch= 60 f. • THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PT LAND SUBDIVISION PO T CDR A TRACT OF LAND BEING TRACT 2A OF COS 1215F DOZEMAN�"MTW5�s--3757 LOCATED IN SECTION 1, T 2S, R 5E, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ENGINEER „3— MORRISON-MAIERLE INC. p» 3011 Palmy SL - MISSOULA.MT 598M PURPOSE R. TO CREATE 18 LOTS FOR OOMMERCIAL �S2y DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE , 11 IN tRNNt/4T RIVER SJB T1S RISE \f • tr d FOUND 3•ALUMINUM CAP `(�j _- r • I Jr�?7�" '�, SI T2S RISE (� � ,fin"7'r %.-. .• i\ •.\ � 1d1• � \ a, Ab3 +. •�I Ib "�'/ F ! �'°\ ti 4rE lrl ( ) ' � � � �•''.�, �. � ; 1� —, `\ `.'•.1 ,pry I I - 'z79Ze7.egRti .t - r�;� \\\ `l.\. ~ c, ;f0 ...'x • 8:41 oem J • 4 /N -- x.• • .v.' \Z " ! •.y ":V / "I /� �, ._\ ;R "��80°PUBLIC AND a n L_ 6 ( \ MAR avk\ �N8T12'24'YI • ' \ G N7Z27'43'E 1.44:83. 34034'40'E 0 \._.,: J -r• �.3 1•i` •r.•s m �,!! 1, J4�- ...... aL a E .(OPEN SPACCE). :• %% }� i N34 ... « 311.47' 65'NORTH 11TH NJO'48'12'E (± �` •. • >i AVE EASEMENT PER \ 54.10' -20:31' COS 1215F t 824 - --- --------- �- 1�15 4949,' - PROPOSE6�WIOE ROAD" 1• 11 - - —..: `.�„"•f 12079`; \ PROPOSED SETYER �Yi•� l�� \ 3 ?z � 1 _._„ , 1 4` '�Tj.J'✓s '"6'°-. � ,u o,* t.:. k.;\. '.-,., +11 ^yleTy« .- :� I ' 8o' PUBLIC STREET ANDJ. _. t' UTILITY EASEMENT 20OFM369 ' t �142,88�f NBTSI 13� d N8 S1'1 a m a 3 PROPOSED ROAD WIDTH VARIESI' Fr _ 198.8 285.69' �2 518113w � 7 ,�Y�• 7 fit° 2 140.962 eq.R c ��- f J 32:88@ eq• , 0.94 oe (- d 81'.M eq.H"\\- �.` 81.BS0 aq•R• �6 �''••� •,a . y a 1.41 dens �{ 15),eq.IL -_ � �• o $ \� a 1.19 aces . 1.83 oere .m rL I• PROPOSED SEWE� `Y 4 .,,qr. (`�" `� l / I�W �d:JNQTER � '•� e� } PROPOSED ROAD WIDTH VARIES - �j;;, ;;: wIDE ROAM•..•, / 'np4.- N 42,887 eq.ft� 41 `. _ ..� �\ _. Cy1 AAVVE.DARR PER _ B-2 R•117 b..m 0.98._ane i� 4�759 aq.R. g 3 � \-- ? 32.5'\_-- COS 1213E L-18 JC in SOT22'2T W.. 1.0E ahee' "'ri r-81.S37 H ♦ :,• \. Y, TAN.B:18•'"- _ 41.JT '•-., ` ( eV• \51.8881�.it 71.J21 eq.R,...` If.TISR$8' --...PROPOSED @Q ..ROAD 1,41y aerml j'. N \1,19 acm �I : 1.84 oerse SBr55'J7� PROTH>SEQ WA7E�L ttrr - \ 1!� �� I R 201.27' ° S8 855 37$ ) ) / SBT55'37-E 5517't\. I\,• PROF10=30� I L-� h s - 9' .81' \1 37 E rv, _u rxz x �3r31 00 I � _• -•/ `.� 5537'* NBT '37'W f m 199.32' 2o1.J0 J , - I: / STREET AND ryr_-3' ',37.149 \IITILRY:EASDIENJ PER J8,982 eq.fL O.BS �iai + ! I\O� 1215E 0.85 oeree PROPOSFD\70' PUE ° 37•376 eq.fL 37,148 eq�J l�e�E \\\ \\\ •�+, i�I 0. S oe,v V' PRO f I ,qqq JO'PUE - , so q ;y A � I EASE•PUBLIC STREET llTILI1V>ti t e —EASEMENT PER COS 1215E •\\.. /'" % J 32.5'UUPRRUUL�BTTLLI�IC�STREET � UTILITY PUBLIK STREET I , P BRIDGER PEAKS PRO 30' ROAD COS 121 I 'r' VIU.A? `SU8DMSION \ _.- 1 9' N r; 146.054"eq.fl T - / I- 4 � /J.Js'neres •, g y • '80 OAK sr. moon PER COS 1215F/ �I —_ € 409 04 \ aFa140 MCbT 1/4 s .. - - T I CAP 1389.88' ` s ....._._...:-- �,....... .: ........ .................------- _.__�...,' Fouo I/Q4RElIT eaol -ezo.00'..............._.... / ii4' I NZW2rc 20�FRW ----- COTTER 1/4 WRIRR N87°55'3rW.. �-----...-2782.35'^—=-...._ ............_ i r LEGEND — 30'OAK ST ROW PER 118 FM 2074 B/S B-2 ZOMNC DESIGNATION(TYPICAL) os N �y " eR-0 R-4 ' ;p��S1'R4µ FOUND 4'X.4'CONCRETE ROW MONUMEIR y tdps'� f 2p>n[R /�qN t 0 FOUND 5/8'REBAR W/GREEN CAP MARKED 14456LS KuiawM . • FND YPC MKO SUG UNLESS NOTED NOTE' 1. SEE PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE DEDICATED UPON FILING OF_THE INFORMATION. .Rzg FINAL PLAT. CURRENT OWNER PT LAND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. , PLSS PUBLIC LAND SURVEY 5f51E11 POO POINT OF BEGINNING GRAPHIC$C� POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT AREA SUMMARY ROW RIGHT OF WAY 1 W )� LDS 47.62 Aare �� 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE TRAIL (PRIOR TO IN TOTAL GROSS 47.82 Acre MORRISON �� NW 1 25 SE MAIERLE bm "'- SEWER BASIS OF BEARING Row DEDICATED PLAT 893 Acre r..�a.ro� • WITH THIS PUT PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA —PROPOSED WATER BEARINGS ARE GRID DERIVED FROM a a rr a r m w a e@• (ae w� ti Ia0 ea ao CPS OBSERVATIONS WITH TOTAL NET 40.79 Acn CLIENT..Ft LAND CALIATIN COUNTY SURVEY-GRADE RECEIVERS AND PLOTTED DATE Jul 21 2008 ' - EXISTING SEWER REFERENCED TO THE MONTANA FIELD WORK• DAZE O8/OB/OB DRAWING NAME COORDINATE SYSTEM,SINGLE ZONE, DRAWN BY SRS SCALE 1�- Tar Ac�oa4M�wskb�4" ---.EXISTING WATER NAD83• CHECKED lit- 0— PROD SHEET 1 OF 2 Preliminary PUD Plan and American Federal Bank Site Plan • THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PT LAND SUBDIVISION vOrWNER A TRACT OF LAND BEING TRACT 2A OF COS 1215F LAND BOzEMAW MTF3�971s 3757 LOCATED IN SECTION 1, T 2S, R 5E, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ENGINEER MORRISON-MAIERLE.INC. 3011 Palmer SL MISSOULA, Mr 59808 PURPOSE 70 CREATE 16 LOTS FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN ... j SPACE w W V• PR���& r .Trice r VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR L KOM a BEIDDA A Prafoodord Enffnnr and End eo h=owtly Chet ateen the 1,the unders"pmporty owner.do hereby certify that I have caused to be surveyed. idan u:d and octobr.pat I s d.nrBrd�uw e �M pep�bmMrsd subdivided and platted Into late,there.whets,and the and other divisiribedotr and tAedwton�� won 76�101 tlro,p,re-}ate reA,and the�a�rwr lc of the dedications.towit ce.hewn by the plat hereunto Included,the following desaribed tract o1 Subdlglon lend,to wit Pr LAND SUBDIVISION Debd th>, e3 of 2W& A treat of land being Tact 2A of C.O.S. 1215F, located In Section 1,Township 2 South, EfbeppES Range S East,P.M.M.. City of Bozeman,Gallatin County, Montano and more particularly desarited as fotlowe Commencing at the Center)i corner of said Section 1;Thence N 87`55'37'W.along the octet-weal midsection line of said Section 1,a distance of 920.00 feel to the southeast CERTIFICATE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS comer of said Trod 2A,sob point being the Tree Point of Beginning;Thence N 87"55'37'W continuing along sold midsection Me,a distance of 472.47 feet to the them'^d"'d scary pwrw� toti crepe a southwest corner of said tract 2A;Thence N 02'22'22'E a distance of 2482.03 fed to fr0reo the to ate,. d an.a,.,.o tor r��enaucsa,,,d the southerly right of way Baxter Lon sa hce.e:7hes along sold southerly right of way through repave clot,woad d ewe and other focmun a Widow and aaow emh tern the lo0owteg course: e.re ma on th►Plot a Aao umb rs.,.e•to hew and to hold aawr. Thence along an ore to the right o distance of 119.61 feet said are having o delta thb or angle of 9'O6'04%a radius d 752.41 feet a chord bearing of S SB'30'23'L and a chord length of 119.39.feet Thence S 5757'21'E a distance of 521.08 feet JERRY PER101011 Thence along an are to the left a distance of 104.70 feet,sold are having o delta angle of 1'22'30',a radius of 4362.30 feet,a chord bearing of S 5438'36'E,and a chord length of 104.69 feet; Thence S 69'16'47'E a distance of 20.94 foot CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS . Thence along an arc to the left a distance of 554.88 feet•said me having a delta L JERRY PDa116,bndo.wr,and L KEDN S 9ODEK a�sy�sd pwfenlwd n0' treeod to angle of 7'4l'27,a radius of 4357.30 feet,a chord beating of S 6726'37'E.and o prosbe F the Sim of Mattes hwwaryy off"that the taberp srprom- npAsa a chord length of 584.44 feet; . - ooMlhw of topr-a d FF LANDr.AIWN6Kl1l,hew bon wwawltl or naakly pmanersd fo Thence S B717'20'E a distance of 232.77 feet to the north-south midsection line•, aaawdws aft the Capro,rd Pons ad epecmaasaw lfoM. J,re pawner Ssests Suwt Sae . Thence leaving Border Lane right of way,S 01'42'37'W a distance of 854.31 feet along nn�esmMrAomnnwareyaetm01 asosst"act le end for a pence of as war cam sold midexUon fine: Thence N 8r56'37'W a distance of 920.00 feet Thence d e pas bamrbuaus brp to dw or�d ors qqyy grates recent as S Ot'42'37'W a distance d 83800 fed to the True Poirot d Beginning. paereedm d oa Pleb rapts wrtuaein wtA=%K"Md to the soon Yrdatea wmorq. Said tract contains 47.62 acresmore or lea,and is subject to all oasements ofrecord or apparent on the ground. sr .. .. The above described tact of land Is to be known and designated as Pr LAND SUBDM6WNeb. ,City of Bozeman,Gallatin County,Montano;and the londs Included In all 09bro Of Public,y f� elne awnuoo,aDeye and trefie or public squares.hewn on aid plot an hereby aid of tt granted and d on a the City of Bozeman for the public use and enjoyment aemn ted to ' tTaaE OF ) DATED this day of 2GO6. OMMn OF )s JERKY PERKINS Date 1Ne krbarwrd sa adoneNdpaO beta.ors n 20M - y It,JERKr PQWB a d Pi lad STATE OF ) e radon fNnwd pabwdta COUNTY OF :Be Notary Pubes for eve state of ftdit Cl This Instrument was acknowledged before me on .2006. or—looks. egan by JERRY PERKINS as of PT Land. Pddsd note of notay . a Montane general partnership CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE Notary Public for the Stag of Laoa[a�rpKAayNlnpmot"moodor or wbb S..iow ay of Borwna6 rontona as tarty cnmy,that the od appraaa 0.anti Awa�Oy a�orW ddodoatben to a*hoo�the 6m w� pAft we M cry Raiding d cod tee tear rhewn a ter old a ewq dadoatae b w dr roe My commission expires Doted so C'd 20011. Printed name of notary awatr Of Pubis Swvlw aid or Bateman CERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ran Fr LAND SUalowncot,able par* Yonts,o,to weir the any d Bateman Yomrw a • fled-afow and wain Z:do k con d thPostant to 70-1-8011 at e eq0,onmm 2M ammNb pan o o�="d. ere cod ad,pnle nwicl d WRIaL Th.dlww�wn� of . SwIlon dot 1 2�r,e,A Y actuate awn IM np8wnrd fa llntane acted this dw of .200L agent K kw arednr of Pablo Srnbe ft of Branm CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER I,KKYnApaery6wgnuddinyan Thicow r d Gab11n ant.Montana do hen*�ttnl ace ='t m tln lend to a �e0 areapel6 Popery tore rot grdol aeewnnb awwid and . _ Dated lfer doe d -200L Treswxer of cam swung CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER L VELLY VAX Coors o d aomrdor of Galaen cant'.Mantwq do hreq owlet thol er ' tapowq wlablerlant cue fled ter try orlb d_e'Cbn%alte_day of 200e,ad naaded to 0.* d Rob a Rqe Ooom.d Nei INaerd,Of so owb and ltworda.Dalian aady,Ile tm aRY arid awadR.aabbl anb AREA SUMMARY LOTS 47.62 Acre TOTAL GROSS 47.62 Am MORRISON 1/4 SEC SECTION TowNSHro RANGE MAIERLE,b ''M NW 6E ROW WITH THIS PUT 6.83 Acre r enq.'a 0.11 e o M ' a,a teen a ter a era wax•rr tee teas lw0 teas PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,MONTANA TOTAL NET 40.79 Acre CLIENT.Pr LAND CALIA7IN COUNTY FIELD WORK: DATE:5/30106 PLOTTED DATE Jul 21 2006 ORANNG NAME: DRAWN BY: SRS SCALER"- 100' le�zere�oaynodl„nwW+ww.ae CHECKED BY6JQA PROJ SHEET--!—OF 2 1lowI II I II I I I I PROGRESS PRINT EXIISSTIIN I I NOT FOR I I 1 i CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY LINE 20z'-4j" I thlll Ct. I I M-d-ills �. I J u a- vme e D. I I I 144'3#„ •♦ Ib ' 133'-4' T I AMERICAN FEDERAL vE SAVINGS BANK Z �— ce Y PROJECT £ ° , Nm o ge W W , BERM j W ✓ �v W W W W W W W W W W W W W IW 1W AREA Wr I � I - 1 M N W 1W I IW FJLOPEN �✓ W W W W W W W W W W v1 W W W �✓ LAN05GAPIN6 VF I fl ICE V A W W W W W W W W O W mW� vAL�p W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I u a ��y -_- 3 W I I I ENcLOSW IE 1� Ock St. I� D°k �g�p Psi LANDSGAPIN6 H W W W W W W W W ,� W W W V. ✓ W W W W W W W W W W W W I W I Y L v a' I s12T SF ro �-. n a 4 W W IN4 W W W W. W W W W �. \ G1RB)6UT,fER W W W W W W W W W W W W W W IW IW z' 7_ W 1W I W I W W ■ W REMOy�4l. W W W W W �~ TYPICAL I W I 1 N ...W �- tll 2 _Ot9 y " £ Birch St. �# N> LANP5CAPING 15b SF u' W W W W W W W W W W W W W W iW I W I i a W IW II W 11 S v/ W W _�L W W \4 - O P W W W W W Y W W W W W W W W W W I y W t W W W W W W W W W W W WV W iW iW 1I St. ^ ,IufIIpM St.23 ag W IW I W Ji v ✓ W 6. W \^ tYt W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W 1 W 1 y W N �jg'`� 1 20_O.. 22'_11i• 1�JI 9 v W W 26 w W W W W W W W W W W W W- W W IW IW I yy b I yd I I.W I W W O•Q� 9 W W W , W W W W W W W W W W W W W w i 2 VAGINITY PLAN z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 5F W W W W Ji W W W W W W W W W W W W W I W I 111 - j I 1 7 Jy W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W IW IW • -3 8O,_D„ - '-O,I NOT TO SCALE O IIA-1 PAPER a W 6 I$ 18475E V) Ind Rig W I I W 5j� ~� kv W I •P re/`/ �yjj "QQ �y�rR`. W IW I IW 4 ,t W �J (-¢, W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 W I Vl W 1 .'EI• V ¢ �m 2�Ep` .II. S D o -Y� y YS - W W W W W W J� W W W W :L W 1L W II I CONCRETE PED CAP I E VENEER TO E 2 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W rV 1 M�AITCHR ILDIN6 W W I W WLANDSGAPNS DRIVE-UP D W J `✓ `✓ W W W W W W W W W 1 W W " I II 1 1 CANOPY O �y�. W W W W W W W W W i ; 6'GONG.WALL al 518 `✓ W W W W W W W W W W W I W BACH O Y O.G. I��ro I W Q WPIN6 W W W W W W W W W W II. I.I. I LV IV EACH WAY 4'I I N W OO J. W O I 24'-6' 20' j LW ltJWDSCAPIN6 EXPOSED SIDE �... 1663 r.�FF N LAND5GACI W W W I W I I W I 142 5E j\ ^ W yI ICI. 1 J p c'B Q FINISHED PLOOR I F' J� ELEV.-4134A' W W W W W W W W W W W W W 4'CONCRETE �I 0 �' BIGVGLE�/' I I "' p SLAB WiFIBERMESH 27 1 / `PARKIN,? ° LANDSCAPING - -V W W W W W W W W W W `✓ W i V. W - PROF LII E c W I W I +P I `� W 28 22s6 SF ` \ ' W W W W W W W W W W v, 4° 1 �i _ ='I 1352 OF � IM 5F / �51DEWALF. A i �. � I `a W I W y W aD 19 ^ :✓ W W W W W W W W W W W I 1 W I 6"COMPACTED - '. GRAVEL OVER N 18'-6" ° W W W W W W W W W W W IV I m COMPACTED SUBGRADE O PROPERT LI IW W 39 30 X • y. \ W I I I __ ,� ,W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W `3' I `I� i + °.•... Q 37 J-04$p( I I 10, P 3z W I WE yI, W � W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I •Y I WI—— — —I—__.---- — I �4J*5'9 GONT, l..�4�'= YS ICI I I i III j N I ,I, 96 33 �, �y W ' W W W W � W W W W W W W W W W W W W W .� .I, I •55•12' 3'-O' _ _ LANDSCAPINS I I I I N Q I W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W r^ �ypt OPEN SPACE 1 I 35 34 Sm Act, W W W W W W J� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W II I �j Ln I W I W W W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W I W I W F•y �� � r. 3 ° I 1 I MEGHANIOAL AND a' W NOW R�AL W W W W W W J W W W W WLAN!25 PINS�, \, W W W W SREEN�VAr-r W W W W III `�' SETBACK `h' `r 1 W x W 1 TRASH p/� Q �A D5GAPINO LANDSCAPING ' I I 3 IRA - .✓ .V W W W W W W W W W W �V W w :✓ W �V W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W —`1T- -a __ --.V, __—`Ir—�� —P——vim —✓ —:Z T_ NGLOSURE — S._-7- W —Z—._� —� �_.�--�.__W —17— —� ! 1 I I I G 3 I � �W W W :v y� .✓ .W. �, w v, ✓ � w v ., v'' ,✓ o- v � ., w� II II I I �i � w � y, v,BERM v, � .r v. �, a, .. ti .v ✓ - - •W � ✓ v.. . � � — W W I' II II ✓ > .a :v O _ _ WALKING PATH W --_ —_ w •✓ :" 561 v' .L .y ✓ '-'_. __ -. -.:_ J - - III _ Y,SF v _ �I!I W :V v, ., T ✓.. J w v^ _ b .L .. 1 Ji V : µ. ,.�u �, � :. � � � - 1�I 1�^��J/M L—We W JiW W W J .v ✓ v :.,W W -.- . w v W W W W;,v^ Ji v W W W �. ` I (. �/� BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING V W W W .W W W W W W W u' ✓ II---------- - W W PRAP62TY LINE W W W Ni W Y . L W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W :✓ W W W W W W W W W W W II �1 N1 W GREENI-AY 5ETBA6 OAK STREET N Q!_ 1"7 O (n SITE FLAN Z 517E IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN STANDARDS OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION 517E ANALYSIS � G-g 20'-O" = P-01 ALL SIDEWALKS,CURB AND GUTTER,PAVEMENT SECTIONS,AND HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY INCLUDING WHEELCHAIR RAMP5, NOT TO SCALE O IUcl7 PAPER SITE 130b52 5F �_ $s 4037-13-01 AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK -- OWNER cq, o DRIVE APROACHE5 SHALL ADHERE TO MONTANA PUBLIC HORK5 PARKING SPACES(SHOWN ON SITE PLAN),HANDRAILS,AND CURB 606 NORTH,TH AVE. LAIDSGAPIN6 1q,500 5F S STANDARD SPEGIRCATIONS(5TH EDITION AND THE CITY OF CUTS SHALL ADHERE TO MONTANA PUBLIG WORKS STANDARD 13OZEMAK MT 59715 (6I286+1663+192+144+230+5Q52a3127+5616t390+240) °D LL DRAWN RAY SOZEMAN MODIFICATIONS TO MPN55 AND GIN OF BOZEMAN SPECIFICATION'(57H EDITION)AND THE CITY OF BOZEMAN STORM WATER AND GRAD I NO 406-506-0251 PARKING(1046+756+516+1352+I01T+1841+156) 7290 5F 5% C'] APPROVED DWG DE515N5 STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS POLICY. FINAL MODIFICATIONS TO MPWSS AND CITY OF BOZEMAN DE51GN5 LEE OLDENBER-ER,PRESIDENT,B02EMAN BRANCH BUILDING,STORAGE,MECH 4TRASH ENCLOSURE 15,410 SF 11% n GON5TRUGTION DOCUMENTATION WILL INCLUDE ARCHITECTS SEAL STANDARDS AND SPEGIFICATION9 POLICY. FINAL REFERENCE STORM WATER PLAN FOR GRADING AND MAIN HEAD GUARTER5 (14118+216+342+152) � P, DATE 6-16-06 AND SIGNATURE CERTIFYING THE DRAWINGS TO BE IN CON5TRUCTION DOCUMENTATION WILL INCLUDE ARCHITECTS SEAL 5TORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION FOR THE AMERICAN 1400 PROSPECT AVENUE SIDEWALK (2256+606) 2% COMPLIANCE. AND SIGNATURE CERTIFYING THE DRAWINGS TO BE IN FEDERAL 5AVIN55 BANK SITE. HELENA,MT 59601 2,562 SF ii ii f o Y COMPLIANCE. COI`7°LIANGE TO ADA AGGE55ABLI LITY DRIVETHROU6H(ASPHALT AREA) 33514 SF 24% LJ �O� s REOUIREMBNTS WILL BE CERTIFIED. LARRY DREYER,PRESIDENT © 0 0 7A A PRE 1 NOT , AN DYKE C O N I T 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I O �L I xx_ I 5 5 - I ' I °,1.6 J. \ 3.3 {J. O lC) M In AA AA `atl I < zr 0 . 9 9 5 ,19 24 A AA 3 8 �. !1.♦ 3 I I I ba` 1Ij AA I I I 77 I , 1 5 I I F�II 2:F 3 1 6 3.9 9.5 .4. ♦ 3.5 8 t 4 g s5i N phi t 2 !1 °4.3 A.3. __ I I I I AA 7 9 8 2 1.6 .2 9.6 °eo 3.1 5 211 AA b.e 9 1.4 1.9 2( 1 a m wd -a.0 3.e 5.2 7 ILt9 .s hs hs b7 1.4 2.a ,4J.1 j/ i � �' I a h s .0 3�,a S �. - \ °4.4 °J.6 �1.5 1. 9 h 5 b.9 I I i I a I � � LA .7 2535 to ,9 3.3 3 4 6 b.4 1 - I I j I AA /� I I // , ��V4�.S �. 4.9 2 i!. .7//b. / .\ '�/ I U.•�i 111q.61 d I I I '� \ 7 I I , to v I I I I g 27 ,0 .� 28 I I AA a f, Ve 6 7 I \ 1 g,e s 3 9.3 X App1l I cqt D o s paq tment I I AA 161� 6 44_1 keJ3d----- 1 AA .4 36'}.{ 4 3 1 OOJ ' � Sanl Ma 1c s, TX 78666 i IJi _N Phone, 1512- 53 1000 , I / Faxj 542- 5 -1 41 ; jl II A I i i 5� 1.9 �/ \ \ Ema I t, inp s s l l 1 bht I ng.taro it N i � I -- `------- --- -------------- ------------------------- ------------ ---�- -------------------------------------------- Projec R4 4- �43 O Specifier- Will Van Dyken BERM Agents Jlm Armstrong - Northern Rockies Agency I c. I I Calculations Bp Charles Aileen - Gardco Llg ti g Date- July 18, 2006 I I � > ..1 a I / -9-tale-1 1 1 r 06\Northern a M42 \ me IcarFed\424-5663 32 �.. Photometric data used Is based on es shed IE p oc dur�s and publls d am ratings � O v) Pt. _x pt, values shown are nor I zonta l I l sum l n a rade'I C s I ng le-p lane I ootcand les. LLF used Is essentially Industry standard. A mor roietspeclflc value_ -regb'IFredr Q t.td pecEanman­ will depend an allast, eledtr1W. and site ch s, °e W (, L-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1u14lnalre_helght_shown 1s apgroxlnnte_Qv_ern,s r1ouD31nghe tslbaYefJnlshed_9cade__iUJt O.) rig Luminalre ScheduleLLA F OAK STREET ProJectl American Federal Bank O �1 Symbol gty Label Description Arrangement Lumens LLF Fllename �• W 19 AA Gardco G13-1-3XL-175MH @ 20.0' SINGLE 12800 0.720 G33X17M. les 4037-43-01 Statistical Area Sr DRAWN NV ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN Project, AFederal American Federal Bank APPROVED WV SCALE: 1"-20'-0" DATE 7-19-06 Label Avg Max Mln Avg/Mtn Max/Min p Pts Units Typical Parking 4.03 6, 1 R. 1 1,92 2,90 103 Fc VE AUTOCAO FILE: 26018/018ES118.DWC 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 C:1CWG140371301(AmFed)IC-3.DWG,72012 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �r��UM 1 i � NORTH 15TH AVENUE 6 p 310'-1j' rn I Iso ig 9O AT A BOULEVARD lDSOAPWe 2V OURB CUR _ _ _ _ BOLLEVARD LMOSOAPINS r () < + L SIDEWALK SDEALKrn 10.I m b_0m�n 8A II I�( ` l ' �S• LiDsSc5n'-0w' - I5•-0• I(——T'-0'—— 15'O' _ _ _ = —_ - B_ERMn � q: __ _ — __ __z � s T —— __—_ _ _— ---_— —t►—N # ————————————————— ———— _ __9--=- _— _—_—_—_— too'o. i — ----t----- _ ————— I— $---- — ——————— mo"z)p AP � �� 1t �{ ` Iq 11 tP i ."��• w ,':``S � r °t.'r-,'�afJ b d + ORIVE-EXIT �£ i I,i� - €' �22��Z�� � i _li 1i�.1(.1 } =�,±:; ,;��Jli - _ � _ B.� �'` ♦ _ �' ry _ ��W W - � p rye] XVN 3'O peon ", go" rn - - - �SS� gh D ice# ht � t ,w r� - - r O Z ObZ �yy� t7i > f < M rn S _R y nn Z gg :N Z 4^7 8 D - - A [�Z r l o - ir;yam� y N o 0 'V' I '�� �'? s � ' `4 - r ry i ,I _ Dwve•PstrER ? Y 1y I `Cc 5 A a z I -(x 1 1I _ L3? W w - del•k u - - ze e £6 I >is,,(£ � ;.�+ .fit(�,1.�f I - .•� � - -. - -� - - - - --� - m - g3 A I ) t4 R If Z m y - + $ 1 z n - - _----- _—_----------- ---- I -' - ----- u p Y SIDEWALK -- i 50EM LK i _ _ BOU='YARD LANQSGAPIN6 - ' -------------- - - - -- .. . -- - . I .r, + - �� r-r---.i------_ .. -� �. NORTH 14TH 1h�"J I I I W ti m po I I I Dn -Z i O t �.Z DONS tS II ('� N.ntn D O D m I ro u I ____ _____________ _ ____________ \ [ q T_1�_________ _ ____ _ ___ ________ s 1- _ Y ��r I _ N 15tn. lu 10' 3-0' a-H' 4' llth Q . a s D`R^3T111 ae QN 0[(Z p(� ,Ai 8p r- t o q; n D Z 0 1 m rr CZ 2 w%�; � _ B JI "' In (i4 II i rn 0 J, 11 $ g AMER I CAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK CROSSMAN -WHITNEY GRIFFIN P.C. . 114 U NEW BANK & DRIVEUP srf � a 6ARCHITECTS 35 STREET (406) 44 -856 (F�E) 7�oN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF PT LAND MAJOR SUBDIVISION, BOZEMAN, MONTANA Box 1198, HELENA, MT 59624 cwg®cwg-arch(tects.com _,o SITE PLAN < ,` As OWNER:.� : PT LAND aea�L 511 NORTH WALLACE AVENUE v T- BOZEMAN, MT 59715-3757 -,,.w,, ENGINEER /� y w MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. Z On ` \ \\ 3011 PALMER STREET PROJECT v x r W-5-04 MISSOULA, MT 59808 AREA SITE PLAN APPLICANT CF LOT 1,BLOCK 1 AMERICAN FEDERAL 7TH AVE.SAVINGS BAPK 606 NORTH - • BOZEMAN, MT 59715 • ) n m n 406-586-0251 n i\ \ !'% '-+�• ��\ 1\ / %Few SL 5 L I R% J w,EL 0 1 q( § \ 1 �I J • i� ' ` • `'�ir� VICINITY MAP Nrs .'•• • J W r \ 555,BD1 Bq.ft\ • } W 6-04, \ \12.75 8c`es �D ti"-- 1 ems, I• l _ EN SIR E) •��:- J; \ \ •PHAS`E 5f \ ':'N7,4i at. I\ -� DETENTION POND \ \ r _ :I 2.70.0 I DETENTION POND \ + I W-7-04 3 I \ \ l 40,962 sq.ft. W- --04. I \\J 326 6 . e ,.a1 -- 5i890eee 76 7115'1\sq.ft — o� � I \ 0 f '1--11,63 acres \ \ -PHAS 3 \ \\ / $-2\ 0� +0'OPEN SPACE ,.-a. .-/ \-\P ASE� l T'BUI�NG S\CK \ fil 42,887 sq.ft:r 4\ \ \ \ / \ -"8`cres \ 44,759 q.ft) 2 B-2 1 1.03 Ores �1,5 3 sq.ft. \ �51,88�st. 321 sq.ft \ r • I L /\ . C acres \ 1`19 acres 71.64 acres 1, \ \R41i 2 /� I B-2 T' 37,149F----3 q• r 36,982 sq.ft. -03 0.85 acrs � acres \ \ / BRIDE RP�EAK3�=1 I ° �\ /��, — / icE'NYQN-Na\ VILLAGE' I _ — — -ti' APPROXIl1�TE rzl J _ _� 1LUMBEF� n '-LOCATION OF PRY L ! r li 37,376 sq.ft. I 33•,149 sC�J \ 0.86 ncfes— S 0.l�5 acres = I TD I z PH E\1 - - II�L / Iv SEWER Si p WA E�R SERVICE - I \ 1�6,054'sq.ft. \ } aggt-�` 3.35�Oeres 1.,\ /�../�.� � � i 1,re��i l l L� ��.' �/ T4 E%w--Exw'a. EZW���_((T�•c / _ ----__�-- LEGEND: h. E%aE E%r E%u , .., _ •. Eku __ PROPOSED KE LINE WATER LINE GENERAL NOTES: EXISTING WATER UNE �- Exss EXISTING SEWER LINE - ® IXImNc SEWER MANHOLE 1. TYPICAL SECTION (PROPOSED) IS 35' TOP-BACK-OF- CURB TO LOT# ELOCF.t GROSS USABLE OPEN SPACE — — — - D(ISTl G MAJOR CONTOUR TOP-BACK-OF-CURB ON PATRICK STREET AND N. 14TH AVE. AREA SPACE REQUIRED TOTAL BUILDING GREENWAY WETLAND/ on+ EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR PROVIDED STREAM EXISTING FENCE LINE ADJACENT TO KENYON-NOBLE LUMBER. _ EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY .14 .� 2 1 D.86 �t a 26 a — EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER 2. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF PATRICK STREET, AND N. 14TH AVE. - - 08 PR POSED RIcG of-WAY ISTING CULVERT WILL MATCH THE ROADS ADJACENT TO KENYON NOBLE. REFERENCE _ = 4 —w PROPOSED WATER AWN APPLICATION PACKAGE FOR CROSS-SECTION DETAILS. 11 - - -S PROPOSED SEWER MAIN —_ m PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 3. THE PROPOSED EXTENSIONS OF TSCHACHE LANE IS PROPOSED TO N LOT UNE - CURB AND GUTTER BE 37' TOP-BACK-OF-CURB TO TOP-BACK-OF-CURB. a +.4 .4 - — STREAM 19 Et . + 4 _ _ WERANO AREA 4. ALL AREAS LISTED IN TABLE ARE IN ACRES. + + A �++ PROJECT BOUNDARY - o STORM SEWER PHASE uNE 5. RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 6.83 ACRES. DRAINAGE SWALE m STORM INLET 6. ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING OPEN SPACE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY 4 W-#-O# WETLAND IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 47.62 ACRES. 79 77 14 17 1 + WETLAND 7. REFERENCE CITY OF BOZEMAN RECORD DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING MORRISON °"m° GREENWAY SETBACK UUTILI LOCATION AND DEPTH. EXISTING WATER AT APPROXIMATELY 6.5' PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN STREAM/WETLAND GRAPHIC SCALE MAIERLE,INC. PT LAND PROPERTY OTHER OPEN SPACE 8. REFERENCE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SUBMITTAL BINDER FOR nN r,w•s-Lrr n.s+o n-Iwlswre r-LrM sR-mi LOCATED IN SECTION 1,T 2S,R SE,P.M.M. © SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. ( IN peer) CLIENT:IT LAND CITY OF BOZEMAN.GALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA BUILDING SETBACK I inch- 100 ft PLOTTED DATE: Jul/26/2006 0 9. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IS 30% FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT AND IS (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) FIELD WORK N/A DATE:07/26/O6 DRAWING NAME: NOT TO BE PROPORTIONALLY DISTRIBUTED FOR EACH LOT. DRAWN BY: MJO SCALE:+�-+00' M:\3948\0O4\Acad\sile pbn\PREUNINARY PUO PUN.Ewg CHECKED By-MR PROJ ;y:3948.004 SHEET i OF I • m+rAs,l • KI1V PRE -1 • I `; NOT CONS a xA 1. ' l i I I 1 1._ �.•____ i� � W O '�5 1 9 a6 a &EPM 3 a] ae ; I ' 1 1 I 1 1 M N L TFr I 1 6 aA .,A < 1 1E2 �� no .,S 9 ''J~ >1.• 1`a 1 a J -31 Z• s I 1e hd 1.3 a 2. a• as AxAA t .2 •1.6 .6 J 1 6 ` 9 a9 a3 •2. • a3 ] I j �1> Q a+. f I ; ' S1 9 7 �. a •. ,7.7 3.f •t.8 2.4 2 9 .35 •2.2 a 7.] kJi6 I i I ' 1 sr In t t._ I I h 1 --�.• .7 •J 9 a 0 •L2 1.6 .2 1.6 •LO a1 5 I i I I $ ]d a 7 e 9 W s InA I I I � 1-•W { . I I I I ' >.O ea8 a2 7 �2. •2.9 a .3�; h3 h3 7 1. . ,4 t1\ a1 LA oc y I 11 �.I aa1 a 2.• 1 a6 s b. h 3 • b.3 7 X I / I 1 I it N W;� O ~O� ,0 px( a o� �F�S ' I I I I U < m LL sl 1 h. a 9 h3 9 o 3 2. S.. a6 B.s 1. �. 6 h i i ' In a S � ... a7 =a3 2.e , a3 .7 • 6 h• • �> /' / i i I ` -rr-- , ? I, ' , i 1• S.�• ly ,I /, / JII w A i • ] b -..� S . •G.7 •2.1 •\'� -,yJ�fl_'_�,poi I h 8 1.6 I ' a 2 a 1 a .6 o a]\ .fir •\" t'• I �. /'/ I I I I _-__- I � I I I 1 AA t ll \ >•/ J'. .k. J p \ \ / i i I I Z i Z 0 \ LCJ � �...- - • , i I I :n _ AA 0 \" V I I I i Y.l S.6 %.9 %.a a 1.0 h 6 23. , I G 1,31 a e s a L] p Appl scat o s De pnctment i li ' . Z AA / / ,/ \•\� .1 C� A• i 161� C o _i _Bn k on s, er._Rd.--.__--_ -- _ inn O • '•.1 .• } -3 -\ C 1 Si Mo c TX 78d66 N'Ip L�1 Phone, 512- 53 10g0 I • I 1 2 •2. 9 9 a34 6\ 1 i Fox, 542- 5 -1 •41 i m . ' I \ 2.s 1.9 • 5 /, •\ ,\ I Ema 1 1- np s s i l i pht I ng.Con H I j ' ----- "---------_. - -------------- /. -- ---..� -- .. --- ._----- -'-- ---------------'- ---- - -- Project:- American-Federal-Bonk----]---J- Protect M4.4- '6fi3 1----- aw I I St-PH \, / '\ Specifier, Will Van Dyken Agent. Jim Armstrong - Northern Rockies Agenc I c. I O z Calculations By, Charles Alicea - Gardco Lig trig ' J Date' July 18, 2006 j ..F_i_lenome-V-\PFI-ate\opps\2006\NorthernRockLe e421 me icarFed\a24-5663 32 I Photometric data used is based on established IES p ocedurgs and publishetl amp"rcting"s." 1 w � 0 In rl -- Pt, x pt. values shorn are horizontal Alum Ln-nce a ,grode!(single-planer,++ i ootcondles. _-__- ��3 '.� - -- - --_ - --- ---- ---_- -- LLF used is essentially Industry standard. A morik project-'speUFic value -m0 g, a required: _E"Le113_pef-focnmce_rlLlLde.pend-on_ncSual__Lampr-ballost, eleStricol, and site chnrQ�teci. Lcs. ~jv U ---_---__. -__--_--- "--------_ Wmina ire het ht Morn is o r ximat r l m n h t FI r < __________-__________________. ghe _.. -------- ------------- Li U Lumina ire ScheduleWJ OAK STREET Project- American Federal Bank + C) W - Symbol Oty Label Descr Ipt Ion Arrangement Lumens LLF Filename -G> 19 AA Gardco G13-1-3XL-175MH B 20.0' SINGLE 12800 0.720 G33X17M. Ies 4037-13-01 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN rl Statistical Area Summary � AFFP.iNLD _Me IIr Project: American Federal Bonk - DATE SALE I-._v-J- �^' Label Avg Max Mtn Avg/Min Mnx/Mtn M Pts Units Typical Parking 4.03 6. 1 2.1 1.92 2.90 103 Fco vE AUT0-.AD FILE. 2601(INISESI16.DW1, DRAINS TO REGIONAL DETENTION POND GENERAL NOTES (SrD PLAN AND STORMINATER MASTER PLAN) 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO MPWSS (5TH ........ Iiv* EDITION) AND CITY OF BOZEMAN MODIFICATIONS ............... TO MPWSS.4 --­-—------------ 12*HOPE PIPE\ ...................... --------------....... DETAJLS. ------------- Cz- 2. REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LANDSCAPING :! Y' i € ! j %4-� i• 3. USE CITY OF BOZEMAN STANDARD FOR INTEGRAL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. <: ........... ... ..............4 4. CATCH CURB SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR THE NORTH RN .........s' .................................. ........................................................ ...................- .................... .... ............................................ 4. ............;; ...................... ........................................ E EAST-WEST DRIVE. ALL OTHER CURB SHOULD BE SPILL CURB. IQ 4 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES. CONNECTION .�. _ .• w .✓ v w y if( roI v i TO SERVICES SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF BOZEMAN STANDARDS. it �€v '� J�:` 9) (; v v w w w J- h'! �. ♦�?:�'�„� J' v v v v v .,. w w J. v w v w /.b •••w ( YF 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL TIE ROOF DRAINS GUTTERS INTO UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN SEWER. .4 P '4 9 7. UTILITY CONDUITS TO HAVE MINIMUM OF 30" 2.4 COVER FROM FINISH GROUND. '4' -4 8. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE 9' WIDE BY 20' LONG UNLESS PARKED AGAINST A CURB, WHICH THE A,-175S LENGTH SHALL BE 18'. A GROUP OF CONTRACTOR STALLS LOCATED NEAR THE LUMBER Ib PICK-UP SHALL BE 10' WIDE AS NOTED ON J. PLANS. 9. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TO REMAIN. FENCING, TREES ETC. WITHIN 4, CONSTRUCTION AREA SHALL BE REMOVED & I El DISPOSED OF OFF SITE. ANY BURNING ON SITE 0 SHALL BE SUBJECT TO LOCAL ORDINANCES. 10. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRE-CAST. w ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND STORM SEWER \\q. II PIPES SHALL MEET HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC (H20) x T4, v LOADING AND BE INSTALLED ACCORDINGLY. If 12. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTIUTY COMPANIES HAVING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ON 4 4, SITE OR IN RIGKT-OF-WAY PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.tT CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING COMPANY AND LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO GRADING ACTIVITIES. rx4 13. SITE GRADING SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL Y EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. <1> 14. AFTER PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED & EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSTALLED. THE Al CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE BUILDING PAD, "T J w I!, I .. GARDEN CENTER & APRONS TO 0- - 1/2- OF • �.. I :: 1�: C W v ,+✓i �. _ .Y v� J• W v �+ .v .Y v .v ,Y ............... SUBGRADE AS PER SECTION 02300, DIVISION 2 OF LOW E'S STANDARD SITE SPECIFICATIONS. 15. GRADES NOTED INDICATE FINISH GRADE ILI ELEVATIONS. TO CALCULATE TOP OF CURB, ADD 27 w .038' 22 16. BEARINGS ARE GRID DERIVED FROM GPS OBSERVATIONS WITH SURVEY-GRADE RECEIVERS w AND REFERENCED TO THE MONTANA COORDINATE FFE=4734.00 ✓ SYSTEM. SINGLE ZONE. NAD83. 16. GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE SHOULD L CONFORM TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 41 0 A, 3 'k 41 41 LEGEND: AREA DRAIN w CURB INLET w SURFACE FLOW ARROW V, 4t�-,,�EIEVATION Q, H H ,'v-- -4 73 ........... ......... VERIFY SCALE[ REVISIONS DRAWN BY: MJO PROJECT NUMBER THESE PRINTS MAY BE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE By 3948.004 REDUCED.LINE BELOW 3011 Palmer Street CHK`D.BY: MRS PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN MEASURES ONE INCH ON J 7 INI—LI.,MT 50.8 SHEETNUMBER ORIGINAL DRAWING. APPR.BY: MRS BOZEMAN MONTANA DATE: 07126M DRAWING NUMBER MORMSON 11=1 MAIERLE)INC. pAsn"Nlint Phone:(406)542-8880 MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY! - Phone: 542-Ml GA.REVIEW An E-p1qy--0-aod Chaip-ly By, AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK jM.UIi48W(MvACADkEXHBITS1BANK GRADING AND DRAINAGM;E.DMWG PLOTTED_ B ONNELL ON Jdrl!W a COPYRONT =0 DATE:— Landscape Plans 01 THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PT LAND SUBDIVISION OWNER PT LAND 511 NORTH WALLACE AVE. A TRACT OF LAND BEING TRACT 2A OF COS 1215F BOZEMAN. MT 59715-3757 © LOCATED IN SECTION 1, T 2S, R 5E, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ENGINEER 0 MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. --.�_. 3011 Palmer St. MISSOULA, MT 59808 PURPOSE �� "•••. �..,�••.�w.,, R TO CREATE 18 LOTS FOR COMMERCIAL . -, •� S? DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE. l� A7 r '� � I ( 1 J '•�' _ j f '•�!- t a w„� NORTH 1/4 CORNER S36 T1 S R5E v � '.., SECTION 1. T2S. R5E O � 'awe± ��_,,,µ W g�+wy3• S), �•-,�\ FOUND 3" ALUMINUM CAP S1 T2S R5E ` 1Ai FA�aEMEf 9 R ST CIS err co ` h 1 d"O mi ,. / .] \-z• ` °16'47"E M_l CS 279 267 4q.fx y i-T-- o _ Q6� s8 o 6.•41 gores .1 I. Z , Y. B-2 � /.".r� +l W IL�W 1 2 j r" J -, _ \\ \\ ,`�\ `�66 PwBUC S7F L�{RND \a�qy• f. ✓� r/ °4 / r I iG •URLITY EA�EMEN PER ,r •tiy I / x ,1 `'', x.._.x'>t---T `�.C°09.'. 2 5F I " - �vmT• io Iry V'r -- �, \x z L. N2IWOZJe3$''E a a. 50.00:, w Z2 •n ,,,� r�j 555,`601 sq.ff.\ N82 12'24 N! n 1 gl0 Wh W ` ,�c/ 1 i •-r - _� 12.75 acres ���a----. 35.20' G NZ2:27'43"E - i - N50'54'40"E 34.05 `.,• `y J r��l =� j (OPEN 8017) N't-26!05rE" 4, / '� .��� dP. 1 i,4&D 7ft:_ ` © I^.,, -' .sa�9a' Z 1,I;� � a�a1b� ,.,\ `f° °�I W2�70.v�y •t' M}p '� T C \ o N34 Oh y�4�-1 _i. "-� M1• ,. "� \ .. .,•��. \A =-�� •,.,�`J 7 I/ - \ -"/ �\ " W' .-�` .\ , 65' NORTH I ITH " ~ NOT�9'1 N30-48'12"E \ I--AVE. EASEMENT PER COS 1215F N 18'24'3,5"E PR R �' PROPOSED S�WE � 4 49 49. PROPOSED 60 WIDE ROAD � Il 60' PUBLIC STRELZ ANDJ -- - '" �. "W A N87'51'15"W, ,11T11 ,8G o ` I � dN5 UTILITY EASEMENT 200FM369 142.68' J N8198.66'}4 -" N87'S1'1$Yy ' " 0 � 198.66" '` NST51'15"W PROPOSED ROAD WIDTH VARIES i I , 285 69 N8T51 i S W 1' �.\ _ w \ . , 24(1 r �,.• 6 40,962 sq.ft +v o M m °P g' o 032Y8Q.sq.f _ 0.94 acres v fO a 6f:609 s ft.` a ^ h 15 �' o a q' \ 51,850 s ft. \ `f)In N e -U-75=�aerg3•o! o N _ 1.41 ocres `: '� q' N 71,151`sq,ft. r� � 1.19 aafe,9 , t N \ acrET., - 0��a, PROPOSED SEWER 85J6 ,•.(,_ .:'3. NST '37"W 1 7.5 �,.W I ,.-+&_IYATER -.\Z �. •° 174.02' �`v 198 65 N T5 -`•° �� PROPOSED ROAD WIDTH VARIESI % I ' 285.69 - G_- 8 5 7 8 55' T \•' 9 I ; .1 r� 2.40.81 , 331.00' rr'" x a,'-••,>`1.,___ ^ ' ; 1 PROPOSEf� 60' WIDE ROAb__ " If \ �, 4'` F1 !�^ 4'1" A w "` \, 65' NORTH 11 TH 42.887 sq.ft,/ v In* - 4�. n --- �]� ,B-2 J ', -+y AVE. EASEMENT PER B-2 R-117.50 b'a 0m...acres cN`F 4j 759 sq.ft,1 N M ,7 n 3 iJ ^ 2 1 COS 1215F m o e 32.5'--- L=16.3a 'rn S02'2Y22"W.. z 1.03 ores a'� ? a'i - 61,557 sq,ft. Ana 51,886`'s :ft. -'� !" - 1 -_�.• \�••. I--32.5' q i 71,321 s ft. f - 41.37' `-., o cy' :,141 acres :ate 119 acres O q ,^n , 0=T,5 56" ""'PROPOSED 60' WIDE.-ROAD Z y,' may. o c� \ ° �,__,__• '" 1.64 acres ry a .- PROPOSED WATER rn \ \ rn / ` v \ll S8755'37"E S8T55`37"E I I B-2 �+ 201 27 198 65 SST55 37 E ` §T155 3TE R SE 28569, 8 S 7'5500'"E I of P 0 0 D 569 a�,,�.rre,..�',...r :Aa w •t N 081 N8T55'37'W ot•F, 199.32' �A w `.30' PU§ILIC STREET AND I a"1 'o UTILITY-IEASEMENT PER I s 37,149 sq.ft--"� < : % 1 36,982 sq.ft. `�' 0.85 acres "* ! ... ,. COS 1215E 9 rn 0.85 acres m x ;Fs r- 1 PPOPOSED,,30' PUE 1 ;. - 1r N T55'3TW � N T5 7"YV� _ \'�_.•\\ \, „� 1 /' �, 201.48 m "-•/� x N 37.3 sq.tt. N �I `a�j 37,J 49 sq ft;. N - o ' o ro 'a - ty(ov, ,sty" 0.5 acres Z i+ KE \ o PROPOSED r !1 i 587 I r z I•'-32.5' PUBLIC STREET AND,UTILITY• EASEMENT PER COS 1215F 132.5' PUBLIC"STREET ,�0' PUBLIC STREET,AA f AND UTILITY"EASEMENT, \ UTILITY EAS MENT/PER + PROPOSED,30'.ROAD - I y-. I w 9 PER BRIQGER PEAKS x`�� ? COS 1215F _ yp0 VI LAC 'SUBDIVISION 1 l st SIN N� I ` yoQJpocl a n 146A54 sq.ft. �pG�ap�y5 •'3.35'gcres >. o r: (I fit• OAK ST. EASEMENT"PER COS 1215F \ I ll SST55'3Y7 --� oslnoN "E �,�r; NOTHING F � I 409.04 FOUND NEST 1/4 - secnoN 1 1389.88, 0 L 2-INCH BRASS CAP _ "'a i• u. 7 ,¢, - ! `"' x; -._., UAK STREET ---__ IN MONUMENT BOX FOUND MONUMENT BOX O -� 920.fX1' - / 1 I N2'S4'25'E,30.36'FROM N87°55'37"W __ C^7'-__ _.27^BQ..3Jr. r _- _ ..! I 1 CENTER ' - __- .-".�.erss ex sa _ 1/4 CORNER LEGEND 30' OAK ST ROW PER 118 FM 2074 B/S 3 "0"r " _._ ____a _ se HOME Loll, 19 rr Op5 2p3g NT B-2 ZONING DESIGNATION (TYPICAL) N SLID$ 0 L T_0 �-� flll DOC 20 2 4 tt FOUND 4" X 4" CONCRETE ROW MONUMENT K FOUND CENTER 1/4PEcnoN 1 2-INCH ALUMINUM CAP O FOUND 5/8" REBAR W/GREEN CAP MARKED 14456LS, • FND YPC MKD SS&G UNLESS NOTED NOTE: . 1. SEE PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE DEDICATED UPON FILING OF THE INFORMATION. J FINAL PLAT. CURRENT OWNER PT LAND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. - IIIJII=fIu(II L' f� a PLSS PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM POB POINT OF BEGINNING GRAPHIC SCALE OEPARMEN7aF pIANNwG POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT AREA SUMMARY asocoMMUNlttotvFLapMFNr ROW RIGHT OF WAY IN FEET) LOTS 47.52 Acre 1 inch= 100 ft. TRAIL PRIOR TO REDUCTION ® Mc 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE ( ) TOTAL GROSS 47.62 Acre a. MORRISON PROPOSED SEWER A n T s NW 1 25 5E $ BASIS OF BEARING ROW DEDICATED 6.83 Acre �" MAIERLE,INC. WITH THIS PLAT "^>y^�^-�"i6 r'•'P°"w -N'--PROPOSED WATER BEARINGS ARE GRID DERIVED FROM xs w.emi"oa 9.,s.n.rrb,Mmub,n.snoi• 1+5c)s+x-8eto p":(+nsl ux-oxc PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA GPS OBSERVATIONS WITH - GALLATIN COUNTY EXISTING SEWER SURVEY-GRADE RECEIVERS AND TOTAL NET 40.79 Acre CLIENT:PT LAND REFERENCED TO THE MONTANA 06/09/O6 PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2006 COORDINATE SYSTEM, SINGLE ZONE, FIELD WORK DATE: DRAWING NAME: ---exvv----- EXISTING WATER NAD83. " DRAWN BY: SRS SCALE::" lOO SHEET CHECKED BY•KSB PROJ #:3948 SHEET 1 OF 2 ' 01 THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PT LAND SUBDIVISION OWNER -� PT LAND 511 NORTH WALLACE AVE. A TRACT OF LAND BEING TRACT 2A OF COS 1215F BOZEMAN. MT 59715-3757 LOCATED IN SECTION 1, T 2S, R 5E, P.M.M., CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA ENGINEER MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC. 3011 Palmer St. MISSOULA, MT 59808 © PURPOSE TO CREATE 18 LOTS FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE. rn PRAREA N} " LI VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR I,-KEITH S.BELDEN,A Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor,do hereby certify that between the I, the undersigned property owner, do hereby certify that I have caused to be surveyed, - months of April and October,2005,1 surveyed PT LAND SUBDIVISION.and platted of same as subdivided and lotted into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, and other divisions and shown an the accompanying plat d as described accordance with provisions f the Montana O P Y Suodiviekn and Platting Act,Section 76-3-1of through 76-3-625,M.C.A.,and the Bozeman dedications, as shown by the plat hereunto included, the following described tract of Subdivision Regulations. lond, to wit: - - Doted lhia day d 2006. PT LAND SUBDIVISION Keith S.Belden A tract of land being Tract 2A of C.O.S. 1215F, located in Section 1, Township 2 South, p10592 ES Range 5 East, P.M.M.. City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Center A comer of said Section 1; Thence N 87*55'37" W. along the east-west midsection line of said Section 1, a distance of 920.00 feet to the southeast CERTIFICATE OF UTILITY EASEMENTS corner of said Tract 2A, said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence N The.undersigned hereby grants onto each and every person,firm,or corporation, whether public or 6T55'37" W continuing along said midsection line, a distance of 472.47 feet to the private.providing or offering to provide telephone,telegraph, electric power,gas,or Coble television southwest corner of said tract 2A; Thence N 02'22'22" E a distance of 2482.03 feet to service to the public,the right to the joint use of on easement for the construction,maintenance, the southerly right of way Baxter Lane; Thence along said southerly right of way through repair and removal of their lines and other facilities in.over, under and across each area the following courses: - designated on this plat as"Public Utility Easement"to have and to hold forever. © Thence along an are to the right a distance of 119.51 feet, said arc having a delta Dated this day of 2006.. angle of 9'06'04", a radius of 752.41 feet, a chord bearing of S 58'30'23" E, and a chord length of 119.39 feet; JERRY PERKINS Thence S 53'57'21" E a distance of 521.08 feet;' Thence along an arc to the left a distance of 104.70 feet, said arc having a delta angle of 1'22'30", a radius of 4362.30.feet, a chord bearing of S 5438'36" E, and a chord length of 104.69 feet; Thence S 69'16'47" E a distance of 20.94 feet; CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS Thence along an arc to the left a distance of 584.88 feet, said arc having a delta 1,JERRY PERKINS,landowner,and I,KEITH S.BELDEN.a registered professional engineer licensed to angle of T41'27", a radius of 4357.30 feet, a.chord bearing of S 59'26'37" E. and a practice in the state of Montana,hereby certify that the following improvements,required as chord length of 584.44 feet; - conditions of approval of PT LAND SUBDIVISION,have been installed or financially guaranteed in Thence S 63"17'20" E a distance of 232.77 feet to the north-south midsection line; accordance with the approved plans and specifications:Water, Sewer.Drainoga,Streets,Street Signs, Sidewalks,&Lighting. Thence leaving Baxter Lane right of way, S 01'42'37"W a distance of 854.31 feet along The subdivider hereby warrants against defects•n these improvements for a period of one year from said midsection line; Thence N 8755'37" W a distance of 920.00 feet; Thence data of acceptance of these improvements by the City f eo-man.The subdivider grants possession S 01'42'37" W a distance of 836.00 feet t0 the True Point Of Beginning. of II public infrastructure improvements to the City of Bozeman.and the City hereby accepts 9i g. possession of all public infrastructure improvements,subject to the above indicated warranty. Said tract contains 47.62 acres more or less, and is subject to all easements of record JERRY PERKINS Date or apparent on the ground. - Kedh(.6.Belden,$10692 ES Dale The above described tract of land is to be known and designated as PT LAND Dsbra H.Arkell Dote SUBDIVISION, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and the lands included in all Director of Public Service, streets, avenues, alleys and trails or public squares shown on said plat are hereby city of Bozeman granted and donated to the City of Bozeman for the public use and enjoyment. - - - - STATE OF ) DATED this day of 2006. coul OF ):es This instrument was acknowledged before me on 2006, JERRY PERKINS Date by JERRY PERKINS as of PT Land, STATE OF ) a Montano general partnership COUNTY OF :SS Notary Public far the Slate of ) Residing at This instrument was acknowledged before me on., 2006, - My commission expires by JERRY PERKINS as of PT Land, Printed name of notary a Montana general partnership CERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICE Notary Public for the State of accompanying Rplat Lh has b en duPublic a mined and has foBozeman, nd ethe a me tto co form to the that the approves it.and hereby accepts the dedication to the City of Bozeman for the public use of any Residing at end all lands shown on the plat as being dedicated to such use. My Commission expires Dated this day of 2006. Printed name of.notory _ Debro H.Arkell Director of Public Service City of Bozeman CERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW © The PT LAND SUBDIVISION.Gallatin County,Montana,is within the City of Bozeman.Montana,o first—class municipality,and within the planning creo of the Bozeman 2020 Community Pion,a growth policy adopted pursuant to Section 76-1-601 et seq..M.CA,and can be provided with adequate storm water drainage and adequate municipal facilities. Therefore.under the provisions of Section 76-4-125(2)(d)M.C.A.,this subdivision is excluded from the requirement for Montana Department of Environmental Ouclily review. Doted this day of 2006. Dab.H.Arkell Director of Public Service City of Bozeman CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURER I,Kimberly Buchanan,Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana,do hereby certify that the ancompanying plat has been duty examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and ' - levied on the land to be subdivided are paid. Dated this day of 2006. Kimberey uchanan Treasurer of Gallatin County CERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDER I,SHELLY VANCE,Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County,Montana,do hereby certify that the fongaing instrument was filed in my office at o'clock,this day of , 2006,and recorded in Book of Plats on Page ,Document No. Records of the Clark and Recorder,Gallatin County,Montana. © - Shelley Vance Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County U11 JUL 2s ;O11fi J FP19 MENT CF r ANNINC AREA SUMMARY De L:•;;; 'LOTS 47.62 Acre TOTAL GROSS47.62 Acre MORRIS ON `mNO s 1/4 SEC. SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE ROW DEDICATED 6.83 Acre MAIERLEIINC. s;, ",;,"ss NW 1 25 5E WITH THIS PLAT xs x,em„e sr.svte,ax uhswm.ar...•Dome(ws)s.s-raao r,.:(we)su-000s PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA TOTAL NET 40.79 Acre CLIENT:PT LAND GALLATIN COUNTY FIELD WORK: DATE:S/3D/06 PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2006 DRAWING NAME: DRAWN BY: SRS SCALE:1" = 10 0 ' M:\3948\DO4\Aaod\preplats\P®Plat.dw9 CHECKED BY:--KSPROJ /}:3948 1 SHEET 2 OF 2 0 0 © © o © © o E COMMON NAME PLANTING MATURE QUANTITIES v SYMBOLS SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE SIZE —{' a is QUAKING ASPEN 2 z74" 40'-50' 25 lJ s O POPULUS TREMULOIDES LACK ASH 2_zyu FRAXINUS NIGRA 'FALL GOLD' 40'-50 9 * n�II NORWAY MAPLE 2-2y" 40'-50 15 Je W ACER PLATANOIDES w w w w w w s, LS n (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDOW) 2-2Y2" 60'-70 15 * 00 .77° PRUNUS;VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED') 2-2y2" 25-30 14 * m n F i Ln s SYRINGAI,RETICULATA 2-zyz" 30'-35 12 �C ® PENNSYLVANAICA 'RUGBY' 2-2X" 50'-60 0 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPI.,E .~j _40. ® (ACER X ;FREEMANII JEFFERSRED') 2-2}2" 40'-50 0 rn ' PRUNUSHMAACKII 1"-iY" 18'-20 7 * d O PRUNUS ;PIN 8'-1D' 30-35 13 * pp LAWN N LAWN COORADO SPRUCE -� -\ t —\ o o F 8'-10' 60'-70 10 JC / PICEA PUNGENS w o \ �:_, * C (COTONEASTER LUCIDUS) 5 GAL 6'-8' 3 ^ v 0 ry PURPLE LEAF PLUM W (� ° LA ° o ry^ SNOW REMOVAL � PRUNUS X CISTENA 2-3' 6-8 9 g 23 0 ® DWARF HIGHBUSH CRANBERRY 18-24" SNOW RE 4-5' 5 11 LANDSCAPI ,� 24 Lf ® DWARF KOREAN LILAC 18-24" LAND 4-5' 9 10 bERM ^� zs BERM ® POT(PnENTILFNTII.A 15-18" 3-4' 30 9 ` 26 ROSE THEEE OF CHINA 2-3' 6'-8' 7 ^6 LAWN ; ® PRUNUS TRILOBA 6 BUFFALO JUNIPER 18-24 WATER SERVICE JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO' GAL 2' X 8 45 ���uuuunn JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM 'WELCHI' 3-3Xz'b&b 6-8' 18 7 LOBE BLUE SPRNS CE r"�j s`= SEWER SERVICE 15-18" 3-4' 12 6 ORNAMENTALEA EGRASSEOBOSA' 1gal 22 * b� . s a I ® PERENNIA� FLOWERS Oa ° �' R T MOSS ROCK BOULDERS 15 � • 3 0 6 N O + l to O ' LA NOTES: 'y o Z ® All planting beds will be edged with Black Aluminum edging. Beds will be mulched with shredded cedar P+1 >Ic 27 ' installed on Typar Weed Barrier fabric. All landscaping jt 26 I�. will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. ,A Landscape Points: Required = 23 plus entry corridor ao 29 and PUD requirements. � \'v�l1�u ` I Provided: 5 North Yard 1••1 39 30 00 y .:w%r qii��C ryw eL Ql l' r/ink 'y/II^ 5 Edst Yard. ,_1 36 3, oo � 14�^,), 10 Parking M 5 Boulders vim- Ln o "��. a 37 32 ® oo 5 Drought tolerant plants (*) >75% bid � o M LAWN n1 Additional plantings are provided for Entry Corridor 36 33 0 "'�" requirements along Oak and along foundation. x co LAWN RC o v,dL`< o to 35 34 RC o �j"ij/t11��<. z m Q) o C a �, „\�. I Irrigation shall be provided via the City Municipal Water N CD SNOW REMOVAL BE7]Td s3' �` u�luw system. ri rn ; 1\.LYi •} LANDSCAPING O 'fq;l�p� � • "/q BERM f CRC 0111�I.0 ���Ilwraj�w�ln`� 'rirl l��a. 10Y"1\\ i/,( o ° v o YV1�OVA• p LA aao o f 10Q 0 0 oc� a oo� c 0 ° n O O O 00�• °1 —'° — —'° OCR• a ° 0� a04 o e04 o � ,e -� N IN) N N Scale "-20' oov t, � >L T m1 T{T1 J nnu^n1 SH�+�=x FXW ECW IXW EXW E%W IXW IXW mw FYW IXW !YW IXW E%W E1tW IXW IXW IXW FXW EXW IXW- yu H SIGHT TRIANGLE GRAPHIC SCALE 40 20 ( IN FEET 1 inch = 20 ft. O © O o O O 0 O ` H Z.B.aw . 1 .I KMAU,STRIA4 PIN' _ • • •.• �I �� •�v � -.• - ®moo ' �, II I • ►��-==�i III `� � 1 • II II rjrj . I� • �'�' .9 ® air\ / -J fil t•�5i .: • ..ill i I - =_ \\ • MBOLS K COMMON NAME PUNTING E 0 A T ING SCIENTIF C NAME SIZE QUA x�r POPULUS TREMULOIDES 2-2 1/2' 40'-50' NA 2-2 1/2' 40'-50 NA FRAXINUSBLACKASH NIGRA 'FALL GOLD' * •\ om. NORWAY MAPLE r ACER PLATANOIDES 2-2 1/2' 40-50 NAILI \ / ® (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON') 2-2 1/2' 60'-70 NA * H 00 ANADA RED CHERRY +\ / PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED') 2-2 1/2' 25'-30 NA xAFANLbL In 2-2 1 2' 30'-35 NA * x` \ (SYRINGA RETICULATA / f- x� ® PEN14SYLVANAICA 'RUGBY 2-2 1/2' 50'-60 NA a ® (ACER X FREEMANII JEFFERSRED') 2-2 1/2' 40'-50 NA I---H E AMURPRUNUSHMAACKII 1'-%* 18'-20 NA* N API US�NIGRA 8N PIN '-10' 30'-35' NA * Q m r; OLORADO SPRUCE �IIIF i \ PICEA PUNGENS 8'-�70' 60'-70 NA r� \ � (POPULUS TREMULOIDES 2-2 1/2' 0'-50' NA � ® SALIX ALBA V. 'VITELLINA' x\ G L N WI 2-2 1/2- 40'-50 NA 3 — x�+\ a BKS POPLAR I ® POPROOU US ' R0 2-2 0 S' 1/2' 0'-50' NA n x FLOWERING CRAB 'x\ MALUS RADIANT 18'-20 NA x WOODS ROSE 18-24' 6-8' NA OUGLASOHAWIHORN i +\ 18-24' -12' NA r CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII NOTES: `.......... 1. IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED VIA THE CITY _ MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM. `>3 2. 140 STREET TREES SHALL DE INSTALLED WITI 1114 10' OF "b '{� WATER OR SEWER MAINS. I 0 -•F � I I ae\ EXISTI G BUILDING CD I zso f V In i i i x 0 a z m E i w i VD _ . EXISTING D I N POND �/ a m I I �0 REGIONAL DETENTION POND - i REGIONAL DETENTION POND = p0 O aC n � v1 - -- c I 5cale I"N 6O'-0° —— — — T HACHE LANE s s ® FLFW 5 I GRAPHIC SCALE I :E INYnT> 1 loon-60 n COMMON NAME LA I EQUANTITIES a QUAKING 4 SYMBOLS SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE REE -6 � N ti 0 ULUS TREMULOIOES 2-=Xe' 40'-50' 25 d K ASH 8 CJ FRAXINUS NIGRA 'FALL GOLD' 2-1�� 40'-50 9 NORWAY MAPLE w w w w w w ACER PLATANOIDES 2-%" 40'-50 15 (ULMUS AMERICANA 'BRANDON') 2-2kt' 60'-70 15 * d CO n , 4 PRUNUS VIRGINIANA 'CANADA RED') 2 2)1- 25'-30 14 * W M ON —07- 7KRI51IKLE IAI--I U1 ss (SYRINGA RETICULATA 2-2X 30'-35 12PRAIRIE SPIRE ASH (FRAXINUS * ® PENNSYLVANAICA 'RUGBY' 22)5 50'-60 0 z ~ '♦ ® (ACER X FREEMANII JEFFERSRED') 2214' 40'-50 0 v ' fu PRUNUSMUR HMAACKII 1RRY '-tY' 18'-20 7 * d o AUSTRIAN PIN LAWN 8'-10' 30'-35' 13 7ti U ` LAWN PINUS NIGRA -_ \ i o o * OLORADO SPRUCE 8'-10' 60'-70 10 * / 0 0 PICEA PUNGENS _1 o C 2- 6'-8' 3 d 0 0 '�' (COTONEASTER LUCIDUS 5 n 1 0 0 T NOW REMOVAL * PURPLE LEAF PLUM 11J r ^ LA PRUNUS X CISTENA 2-3' 6'-8' 9 V show RE a P ° DWARF HIGHBUSH CRANBERRY 18-24' _ 11 5 52 24 ® DWARF KOREAN LILAC 18-24" 4-5' 9 +0E+ c POTENTILLA BE ® EE 15-18• 3-4' 30 It 2° �! LAWN a ® RPRUNUSETRIOLOBA lNA 2-3' 6'-8' 7 WATER SERVICE a O BUFFALO JUNIPER 18-24 JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO' 2' X B 45 .. JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM 'WELCHI' 3 3Vbkb 6-8' 18 * A SEWER SERVICE LOB PICEA P BUNGE LUE ENS SPRVGC LOBOSA' 15-18- 3-4' 12 * ' ' I �/ ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Igal 22— Wk. I ® PERENNIAL FLOWERS ~ W 15 s MOSS ROCK BOULDERS o z I o 3 Ak a I o ° NOTES: a a All planting beds will be edged with Block Aluminum r * 2 * edging. Beds will be mulched with shredded cedar 1+� j " Q Q installed on Typor Weed Barrier fabric. All landscaping y ,a will be watered by an automatic sprinkler system. Iw .o r a Landscape Points: Required = 23 plus entry corridor r1 V u and PUD requirements. 1� (Dj, * v� _ z� Provided: 5 North Yard 1� z 5 East Yard QI rn Q 38 " * c 10 Parking 37 y= 5 Boulders [V Lan' 8) 5 Drought tolerant plants (•) >75% 33 C ** o LAWN Additional plantings are provided for Entry Corridor � u LAWN * o ,� requirements along Oak and along foundation. Q o Co 35 oo C € I y z m E r. SLANOSCAPING BE systet�on shall be provided via the City Municipal Water BERMn'IM ,;;I �� 10 7 I m '�soll me a3`•Y� .��,f.L 'l J o � 3 ° Aav LAWN'�a d Aa - - a� ' o . .p (D Q o __si TN .:3hI vN --'' Scale I"-20'-0" `n 9 SIG TRIANGLE GRAPHIC SCALE -7 Eli F a F=T) 1 ImL— 20 'L J Architectural Drawings F-RoxwlbE ELEV.=417066' —_ 12 _ SKYLIGHT \. ... .. PROGRESS PRINT ' — STANDING SEAM OR - PRECAST NOT FOR -- -- "- - - ASPHALT 5HINGLE5-7 GONG.BAND - CONSTRUCTION _ _ - BRICK VENEER - - ' ',-:F I METAL WRAPPED FASCIA - WOOD BEAMS _ 04_ e, _ '? STANDING SEAM OR ._ ,,,,, a_ ^1 r, •:..,'., ,.,- ." ASPHALT SHINGLES ASPHALT SHIN6LE5- �2 ••f II;II�II — _-- {, _ �(j,, Q It, ++ a _ = rvri cc i®i NQ'1 R - � a 4 "-+wep;rA•m s� II r � ���` m r�yq �� 3 p�$ Q -'' TY :I�� ,-.. ❑❑ ❑❑ rT4r2 F1 V `Q� Ape, �¢€ � �t ' ❑❑ - BRICK VENEER CONCAS&4ND FINISHED FLOOR METALLIC ELEV. 4T341. CULTURED STONE VENEER n50UTH WEST ELEVATION y NOT TO SCALE O IIXII PAPER RIDGE ELEV.=4710.66' f-RIDGE ELEV 4710bb 12 -�STANVIN&SEAM ORa ASPHALT SHINGl.E5 _ - - - .,.:METAL WRAPPED FASCIA. STANDING SEAM OR� PRE CAST _ �' -___ CULTURED STONE ...._'._ ... -:.ASPHALT SHINGLES .::. .. CONC.BAND -.. _. ._ ._ ... ,..n_ woo-_@ YENEER �.:; -s._BRAGES _.__..._ zpgg WOOD BEAMS METAL k71RP'PPED FASCIA ___ .._._._... _':.: _. _-__ _-- _'.. ter..:: .:__.__._ - __ BRACES - - ________ 4 P Nk 5 BAND r---' _� I2 __- - - .. =v"•rr r7.- •F- 3. ,a- _ - IC ay •"1� 3 i r METALL f� � r ' V is . r_{, �.T`'I - �t-� -.:ice•' r „_ X_. _ r i i STANDING SEAM OR -_ _ - �i , KF.{T� ': .,_ '. ..,...+F-Y -1 .a:F-.•sS:.,. iy'.. K F w f SPHALT SHINGLES .;:� r �. ,l=a=*E�� ..'s:-', • N .C .-^`tr r= ,3,4 .. Ll - _r. �- �k-T")"1 L-I�� ;. J � f�.�• I M� :ny `�'.' �..'i��� �z '. �1 r 4 it.: �p ❑ ..� ❑❑ ❑ .- + °-,: 4 9'r 9 +�i'tr 4 �' f ,.- =Li 4 #'` £1 i f ` T r '.fir PRECAST _. ❑ i '` �`-s P' r 1 LONG.BAND ❑ - .9.�,:';:�.7, .�rry �i•'r.r - ,, . LFNisHEp FLOOR ELEV.•47340 BRICK VENEER CULTURED STONE VENEER METALLIC FINISHED FLUOR CULTURED STONE BRICK VENEER n ENTRY (NORTH ELEVATION) 50UTHEA5T ELE ELEV.=4734.0' VENEER A-4 1'-0' NOT TO 5GALE O IIXI7 PAPER - � A-'f I/b• I•-o+ NOT TO SCALE O Ilxl'i PAPER VATION _ _ - 44 12 4p - :- "-:STANDING SEAM OR .._. _/ ..K...,. .. .__. ASPHALT SHINGLES__._ .. _._ -METAL WRAPPED FASGI.4 _.: BRICK Vei1BER METALLIC -. ___ INSET _._....._.....' ...._, _......_.'... FEE 'Y. 4 m 12 N '�. i LIP 2ND FLR '�I4 u - n AN-x'�.*.srY m .__... �" �`�� ;,� 2-'` ;�• 12 CULTURED VENEER —BRICK VENEER VENEER— Q CEILING 'A jt Q • GHANIGAL MFLR� O fV � ENCLOSURE �. .: - PWI 5 5EGTI ON �a ❑❑ Q A-4 I/8'•I'-0' NOT TO SCALE O 1147 PAPER ^ ©NORTH WEST ELEVATION METALLIC, RIDGE ELEV.=4710b6 I/b'=I'-O" NOT TO 5GAL I"I INSET i GONG. Q SKYLIGHT .. 12 _ .-_ _- -__ _ - - -. 4p - A5RW.T SHIN6LESC� BRICK VENEER METALLIC _..... -� nw v~i . - METAL WRAPPED FASCIA— ❑ �� _ w 1 m ��❑ - _- 4 .-1 N 4037-13-01 DRAWN RAY i. 8 ❑� t" ❑ ❑ ❑. - 1_- x t _'"' APPROVED CWG DATE 6 16 06 FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.=4,54.0 @LORTH EAST ELEVATION Jed�� A I/B'-I'-0" NOT TO SC A ALE O IIXI7 PAPER O 0 O 4 O O O NET FLOOR AREA 1* PROGRESS PR 1 M —_______�/''1 • NOT FOR \ // 9 0 14AIN FLOOR 65.F. 14.116 21'D FLR 65P. 51 CONSTRUCf1ON66 \ / OEDVCTIONS ' . ENTRY 240 STORAC- TAIR 106' LOesY I$HO TOILET ROOFF STORABER£LN 9.437 • ... STAIR/TOIL MM 'I \ / I E . TOTAL M LR DED ICT. 5251 NET MFLR AREA 9,461 NET 21,10 FLR AREA 4J01 I Y I V cw TOTAL NET AREA FOR PARKING GALa&ATIOIF•19362 NET S.F. I I -I V j, &5%15_ •IIST SF/900 a 9H PARKING SPADES REOIARED 34 I 1 I V s i % all I I Isil DRIVE W cANDPr I I I � y�i I I I tan a, 0 I I I an $r l!4, 1 I I ,N H _ ail 343-1 SF _______________� I I.______________l (n W IJ� ^ Natt aN / --------� p ❑ %!' / /�\ \I --------- --17 -J— i ---------- T •G' .-° £ ° 2405E reLae //-✓ ���, �; �,� - �/ ♦♦ ♦ / t�-----T I s: 9 / 1`1Sa f_Ify - s• o r' --� ` --- ------------------- o I ��° �. ✓ �� I ♦�� ♦� i I .... p -..._.._..---------'-- —� Io6ss (� ME i OPEN LOBBY .......... , � _ ..___ w:n.0 � � 9 � /:. f� I _____ I sKYaGNr `♦\\ , / -_ � s NR �/ / I ......_..__._. •9TAR - / / N av�oNcc .......... ......... %• :! / / I I \ ♦ \ i / I O p - -- -- � � �o° I �STAR \ ♦ I / / ,I p \..--_.-._._......_.._....._ -. O I —— I ♦ ♦ ♦ , sT I W) _ ao X, o --- — --- — -- / jiiw DONS �� /� ' I ' \`♦ \♦\\ ♦♦♦ �♦ \`. , N ® .) ...._...._................................._................_......._. ST—c ----- w....._._......_......_.._..._..__.................._.._..._.... SBEVHt p L T— — ------\ ♦ / ♦ Y---- 1 W 4 oral --.....---.._.._...-- 1•„TCR I // // I ♦♦ ♦♦ `\ I I �._1 LLl L J p I // // I ♦♦ \♦ \ c I ♦ 0 ---T W O Ine _____T ------ L Cll71 UJ Tlcl ------------/ n orsrt I g a,rr---lce, i � ayslce I ar'Ke oP'K! I / - 1 I I \\ ♦ / Lj —————————— ---I I H--------- / Lai 3 b b 4037-13-01 nMAIN FLOOR PLAN _ 41H SEGOND FLOOR PLAN SJ� REED c,� I'o- 532-•1'-0' DATE 6-I6-O6 v NOT TO SCALE 1 IIXI'I PAPER NOT TO SCALE•IWT PAPER 1 CO3A VAC WG74 0 3 71 3011A-2.d)W 7:58:19 AM _ • ,i I'-0'ry• 14'-0' 26'-0• 26'-0" 26'-0• 26'-0' '�'-0• I20'-0• 14'-0• 2H'-0• 22'-0• T'-9i' 2g•$�• i I � ; i ; e _..........-........... _.......... _._.._.... .... ' I a a - --- ............ -._.-.__._......_.._ .........._......---......._. . _.. _ I P a 3 C+ I Og 1> a• D -n o (, i I ; r e Z ...__ .......... ............ ........_ _ .......... __.......__ _ .. a ... _ .... ........ . .......... ..... N r , 9C, 4 r N I I I _..._................ ............................_. ...._..._ ................._ � I a� o oA N 1 C U m I i 0* 13'-b' 14'C 9n'-4' 16'O• 26'-0' b'-0• 12a-0• _ $ AMER I CAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK CROSSNM °WHITNEY ° GRIFFIN P.C. NEW BANK & DR I VEUP ARa1TEUS A.I.A. (406) 443-2340.(PHONE) (A Fn 650 POWER STREET (406) 442-9565 (FAX) IA w LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF PT LAND MAJOR SUBDIVISION, BOZEMAN, MONTANA Box 1198, HELENA, MT 59624 cwgmcwg•arch)tects.com D' 0 •tl PoGIDS xGCMvED A �..r w°ee ubegqM a reuk:r°brrn ra.D:utllw tl w M anw m M N.rn.nW rb.«r nrww, n.kr MAIN FLOOR PLAN STUDY #4 V:1C WG74 0 3 71 3 011A-3.dw*6 8:01:22 AM • r_r I. r----------T—�-------1 —————————— — I \ r ..........-_......_....-- _.—{_._._....� --- ' -- I .............. ♦^\ - i ..- .................---........._ ! e. I I \♦ I I I I /I i \\ I I \1 ! ....... .. _.... / /r ry ! / I ......_---......I.-......_._:_..—_......_... -- _------- __. ..... Z / I .Q I I --- ------------fill -- i /Y ` I /♦ yc' / // i !i I I ! ♦ � ! I I�i // // I! I I ♦ —————————— I / i c ♦ p I I ! ! m l / ass. /� // �. / I \♦ � \\ I mi i ♦ —� .......... ♦\ �y. / I n gym:._ . I E ♦ \ s ! V + -------i— --------------L--- --- ----- —y. I ♦ I � �t • I , �— —————————————————————— -——— —y 28.0' I b-O' 8.O' b-O'' 92.-4. i P A $ �AMER 1 C�A�N/ FEDERAL SAV 1 NGS BANK CROSSN AN °WHITNEY -GRIFFIN P.C. V NEW BANK & DR I VEUP ARCHITECTS A.I.A. (406) 443-2340 (PHONE) r" a (; LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF PT LAND MAJOR SUBDIVISION, BOZEMAN, MONTANA BOX Powell STREET (406) g-archit (FAX) d in BOX 1198, HELENA, MT 59624 cwgOcwg-nrchltecta,eom SECOND FLOOR PLAN STUDY #] 0 M ° �� p �„ ° �' �' �• " n°m d':w.NwdS:—:..m'In:'rw'�i n'R.z .�.u..`"`.�i'w"i.�'•,C.°a un m`�"�r.a'n."'e�.w.•�,'.:.::.":°:°:e �RID6E E1EV.•4nObb' -' ..._......................._ _.._............ ......_......__......... . - _... :.. .. - SKYLI6M 12 ep _ _ �.... .....:._.. ---- - - -... - _.. R PRINT PROGRESS __.._.. NOT FOR -........._...... ....._.........- ...._...._. .. .._........._.... .._.._...._... rANDlne AM ...._.._._..._..._.._. .......PREGAyr._...._:-:.-.._._...... ......... ......-.-...................-.............._....................�....... .. ..5... SE.._...0!i.... _.........._._...... . ....._. - 5 ..._.._.._.._. ,. ...ASPHALT 5111NBLE5 GONG.BAND-.. _ ..... ........... .............:_::::::::::__.:::::_:::_......:.-::::::::__..:_.....�..... ..: - ___ - CONSTRUCTION .___... ...___.__....__ .._-_.._........_...._.._...... _ _ _ _ __ _ __ ____ _ _ _ _ _.......... _ _............_ •-"'BRICK VENEER... ..... ........___........._. ......._..........__.............._. ME TAI,wiAPPED FASCIA........._..._. BRACES i. V fC: 515� ..................... .............._ ..._ ........__........._._..... ................... .................................._.. ................. ..........._... _ — _ 6..1..1 2 m O Y r i• 4p ............:..........:.....__..___ ......_...._.........._.._...._....__.._.... ............_............;_,...._.... ........ ......._...._.,__.............._............... ......._............_..._.... ___......... .,.....,...._............:G.... _ SrAND1N69EAM OR 12... - tiJ4__ __ .. - ...._.____.__ _-_..__..__...__.._ 5TA1✓flIN6 SEA. —_-__ — ---- - 1::":_. - ..........__ - _........ / _ OR ..<,........ •:.^..�.__-. (.' 1 _ASPHALT 9NINSlE5:.12 _. - _ ...Q ::::: .. ............. . � ... .... .. _ ASPHALT SHINGLES .. V 5p ...................... ry 00 •i .L V 4 b 50 f �o r. 1 . ....•...,,..,.•...,,•... :,:. a.l--..I:.. �,. ,:i'; :...:............ LL • - - FINISHID FLOOR BRICK VENEER PRECAST� TSTALLIG - ELEV.•47340• GI.LMiED STONE VENEERS - eAro SOUTH WEST ELEVATION � '4 1/6-•r-o. { NOT TO 5C X O IIW]PAPER A ' RIGSE ELEV.•471r080' N ! '. f-RID6E ELEV.•4TIOb6' ..-_...................-...._........... - -..._ • 1•^ � -'_........--..._.....—___.._.-_'_'_-___' '_rSKYLIGHT .............._......_.. ..........._.................. .__:..._.__..—..................... B rANrnN6 S.A.OR ...... ..___.._..___��.... ASRW_T SMINSLES r. .. ...... a ,[ ...... .. , ... .. �`` -".....METAL YRP.PPEO PASCIA-::..::. ...................... _. ........_....�.�--.w,�._._ �..—'__._.PRECAST.._......._. \ _ ........._._...... .........._........__........._._.... _..__........... ...._.........._........_STANDING SEA.ES ......_..__..........__....... ... .+ CULIUFtED STONE ......__.........._ ._.. ...___....._-..... _ — W W AS. 1. SMIN6LES GONG.BAND".. .._......_....._._.. ........._.....__._..._.._....._..__. — _ __ ... - - __ _ ..._ � MbOD �J .. .. ... .. .. .. .BEA-1�'3� F .. _ ... .. .. _BRICK VENEER ,. .. ..: ,. • ....1 BAKES...._.:._ - ....._...._... ...._...._-.._.....—.__.._.... ..._.....__.__.. _.._..._..._.._...._.__.... ............._._......... _............_._... ............_.............._....._. ........................ ...._........_......_.............._._. ........._.._.. ....._.-........................ ... ...... ...__._..._..........__.__..............__... _......... WtAPPFD FASCIA.........._..__....__......_......_............ ..........._............ ............_........_............._...._.._..__.........._.............. ...................___.... ...__......_..........___....__.. BRKES .. METAL .......:....:::: ._..._..__.....-... I i gQ ---._: GONG. .,T Ln �I3 --........_...__._.....------- ..._ -1 _ Ya52 r• I .5..�.._. 11.._...._. - Ypp - METALLIC _ trn STANOIN6 SEA. 4 4 ... _—_ASPHALT SIUN6lESEs v Q I �e .. .. .. ..... .... ..... .1. 'f' - .I - 'L ( N ; PRECAST .,:. ..an _5 • .... .. .. � '-. ..... .. I I I-I.• •I.I• I xl•" 1..1'I. •:.:•:•:•:':•:':':•;•:•:'.,:•.•: �'..� __.._._�_.. FINIED .., .. .._ ... ........•,. •.•.•::...•.•...•......... �'I�r, I.I-�.I�r�I,r-:1.1,�,1,'i-_.1 r i ;,:,:.;.:.:.o-:•;•:•:•:•:•:•:._.I�`_'� I.:.i.l :.•...•.•.•:.•.........• .. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:...:.:. .,.�:::. n ........ ..- SN FLOOR _ _ ELEV. 4,340 TR2 ' BRICK VENEER CALED STONE E E VENEER I' TALLIG FI11151E0 FLOOR C„ NE I TIPEO STONE L BRICK VEER 3 ENTRY (NORTH ELEVATION) .ELEV.•IT340'- VENEER - f"4 V8_ I'-0- NOT TO SCALE O II%!l PAPER _ ....._.._.__..._.. ......__... SOUTH EAST ELEVATION 1/B- 1'-0-NOT TO SCALE 1 I1Xf1 PAPER Q4 _.._.._...-... _.::_....._.:....�._...._....._ .._.�._.._._... ._...._..._. ....-•--• •_--........___.._._._......_. �.r.._ ._. ... __ ._. 'STANDING SEAM OR""__.._ .._. ...... i ASPHALT SN N6LES... _................._.._.............._.._ .._................_..... ....._........_ w.^:•_:_. .::.......::::_:::.:__:..:__:_::...... ..r......._.........__......._...._..._....._......_v......_...... ..........._........ ......._..._......_....._...........__..........i. _. • /� ... .. '' ' % •!¢TAL MRAPPED FASGA METALLIC \•.w.... '..�:i'. _..._................_...._....:..._...:........__.._...._...._:._. .......... .__.._...... ......__..._..__....._..._.__..: ...__.....:...._.......... ........_............_.._................_........_��..:.__._BRILIC ...INSET CEILING ...___._..__.._ ..._............_..._.................. ; 1 1ND FLR d4LJ7, 1 m 5, m• ._..-....-_......�_...._........._.....—F—...--' -_ ..:./� .._.-. __—_.—�.__—_—. _.-._-_.--. .•.. ._____._.. I.11 --__.-___- STONE.'__-_-'—T•_-: MS G -BRACES 9;411, BRIGK VENEER RK _ Q CEILING :1 1� �' '�: •.'.l it - :I::':y+w-- 4 W 1 V 1 Im•, m �r 4 4 ... ...... ._..: ...-::.: .._....... .:... .:. ..:......... ... 1. .. .. 1 -- _ m , Q ..... , I' MF .. ORI Wll N .......... .......: .. I rv .......................... ............_..........._.... ............... ......... 1 .. .. � .... .. ..�.: - .�...... .......�.;..;.. ..........._ ,.. 1 ::..SET! .:......•,•..�• Y .. ww SECTION •. .... . . '`!i,• �j VB-.r-O' NOT To SCALE I 7 PAPER �,y5 NORTH WEST ELEVATION ETALLIC J RID55E ELEV..4no,". V I NOT TO SCAL ST GONG. ...._.....__..._.._... .....__......._.._ _._._...._._......_._.._...._.._.... ................__ D • '-0 l --" .. -... TANOIN6 AM OR ..___...._\ .._... _ ...�....,w....-.. ............._..................._....... ......... ............ .. .................... ASPHALT SNIN6LE5'e'L _ .......... ............ GK VENEER.. .' Y'� 4 ------ --- ------_r—cac_-..._.. ...... _ ....I Lam::............._... .._..........�,w _"::`...�.`_......._..... _...._ 1 - =-----__ — - a r C 'METAL"ZAPPED FASCIA- vl Q K V �.5 r :.. :r.•.•r,r. , . ... rU - c - • ,..; F. ... _ Q I4 ••4 Q r ..,.;,'.•f;{..:::!::;;A.; RAY DR AWN .!• .. ... ..ti...... � ...:......_......._....:..:-:.._......., APPROVE o ... :.:.:r .. .•::.•..:r.'.y.,,..;,:.;r•:•: - DATE 6/16/06 Q FINISIEG FLOOR ELF 4'S,o NORTH EA5T ELEVATION ///]Q��\\O�I/D-•1'-0- NOT TO SCALE 0—PAPER ({ >1i I MI Ir� TTx -�r�� % -:',ill r����W _ irim� ' T I Or .� , AL �jm No, 41 WA io 1p 44 ff VA rep wt ,ormr! '11fa$ 1+►Vr ► 1� �' �` ti ' 4 / Aj I , a . AM �y ■ k t L Am a Mill • r' 11 ■ll 7 R ' ■� k Y. r may?:k a kt ���1,p; '���.A'►'" �;�J 'is '-� ';i��_ � � � �.;;,� ; qA 61 tip`" -, � 1�r� r, �• v.��.+.-i- \\ ,\'������� -. . `�\1�'�\��J 1�`��. It"AffI Elm i1\\ \�r r 4.. 14 us 151 4 i - t r S 1 r! } w, n F, :r ZV ^' 5- �°, ohm � Rt'- 9. ■ Ii :c ' � • • 1 4.�•, .f �� 1�.x- �1.' .i`. �i: ..� �� • f t! • Y x c a� n. Q �: . a RESPONSE TO PREAPPLICATION COMMENTS • Response to City of Bozeman memorandum to Development Review Committee dated 3/22/06 GENERAL 1. This proposed Subdivision is located within the following payback districts: • Hampton Inn Sewer Payback • Baxter Lane and North 19th Signal Payback • Tange LLC Water Payback The applicant has already participated in the Hampton Inn Sewer Payback and Tange LLC Water Payback and will provide documentation to the City. Upon previous inquiry, the City indicated that the PT Land parcel is not within the Baxter Lane and North 19rh Signal Payback area. 2. Unless currently filed with the property, the applicant is advised executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of S.I.D.'s shall be provided and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office for the following: a. Signalization of the intersection of Oak Street and North 11th Ave. • b. Signalization of the intersection of Oak Street and North 15th Ave. C. Intersection improvements at Oak Street and North 7th. d. Street improvements to Baxter Lane including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage (unless currently filed with the property). The document filed shall specify state that in the event an S.I.D. is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development or a combination thereof. The applicant agrees to participate in the above mentioned Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of S.I.D.'s as a condition of Final Plat approval with the exception of the signalization of Oak Street and North 11 th Avenue. Kenyon-Noble has agreed to pay for that improvement. 3. Proposed phasing shall be depicted on the preliminary plan. The full extent of all proposed infrastructure improvements required for each phase shall also be clearly indicated on the final plan submittal. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless otherwise allowed by specific approval of the City Commission. Phases shall be numbered in the order in which they are to be built. Proposed phasing is noted on the Preliminary PUD Plan and within the Preliminary Plaf/PUD Narrative. Phase 1 includes Lots 1-5 of Block 1. The subsequent phases are • numbered according to block number, however, the order is which the phases are to be built is dependant upon demand and is not determined at this time. The phasing schedule also identifies improvements required to support each phase. STORMWATER 4. A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silts, oils, grease, and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and.approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention/detention basin location, and locate and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin sites, drainage ways, and lot finished grades), typical .stormwater retention/detention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within park or open space shall be designed and constructed so as to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the park or open space. Storm water ponds shall not be located on private lots. Detailed review of the final grading and drainage plan and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. • Currently, there exists a temporary storm drainage easement on this property for several adjoining. streets and a neighboring lot. Prior to development an adequate permanent drainage plan must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer, and any easements for the temporary ponds must be properly vacated. A Stormwater Master Plan is included with the PT Land Preliminary Plat/Planned Unit. Development application package. A Final Grading and Drainage Plan will be submitted to Engineering as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. WATER AND SEWER 5. The location of and distinction between existing and proposed sewer and water mains and all easements shall be clearly and accurately depicted, as well as all nearby fire hydrants and proposed fire hydrants. Existing and proposed water and sewer mains and easements are shown on the PUD Plan and Preliminary Plata 6. The Developer's engineer will be required to prepare a comprehensive design report evaluating existing capacity of water and sewer utilities which must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The report must include hydraulic evaluations of each utility for both existing and post-development demands. The report findings must demonstrate adequate capacity to serve the full development. The report must also identify the proposed phasing of water and sewer construction. If adequate water and/or sewer capacity is not available for full development, the report must identify necessary water system and sewer system improvements required for full development. The Developer will be responsible to complete the necessary. system improvements to serve the full development. A detailed comprehensive design report or Basis of Design Report will be prepared as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process and will follow the report format as defined by City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. 7. It should be noted.that this site is located in an area of high water pressure. The design of the water infrastructure will need to account for this high pressure. The installation of a pressure reducing valve(s) (PRV) will be required. For further detail please feel free to contact the city engineering office or the water/sewer department. The proposed design accounts for the area of high water pressure and includes a pressure reducing station. Morrison-Maierle, Inc has coordinated with the City Water Department on this issue. • 8. Easements needed for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of the easement. All necessary easements shall be provided prior to Final plat approval and shall be shown on the plat. Public utility easements adhere to width standards for water and sewer. 9. All water main extensions of more than 500 feet required for any phase of the development shall be fully looped. Water and sewer mains shall be extended to the property lines to adequately accommodate future extensions and/or looping. All proposed water main extensions of more than 500 feet are fully looped. Water and sewer main extensions are provided to property lines as deemed appropriate. STREETS, CURB & GUTTER AND SIDEWALKS 10. Proposed street widths shall be indicated on the submittal. City Standard curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be provided along all streets in the subdivision. Streets within the subdivision will be City standard width. Detailed review of the street and intersection design and approval by the City Engineer will be required as part of the infrastructure, plan and specification review process. • 0 Proposed street widths are indicated in Figure 3 of the Preliminary Plat/PUD application package. A request to substitute a meandering trail for a City Standard sidewalk on the • north side of Tschache Lane and the south side of Baxter Lane is included with the Preliminary PlabPUD application package. Street and intersection design will be submitted to Engineering as part -of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. 11. Tschache Lane must be extended the entire length of the subdivision, so as to connect North 15th Ave. to North 11th Ave. North 15th Ave., or a comparable public street, must be extended to the north as to connect Oak Street to Baxter Lane. All wetlands regulations and stream setbacks must be abided by when considering the alignment of these roads. All alignments and designs of these roads must be reviewed and approved by the city engineering department. This project proposes a private street between Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane and extend North 15th Avenue to Tschache Lane. The Preliminary PlatIPUD application narrative offers 3 example alignments of the private drive. In effort of accommodating competing interests, a relaxation to BMC 18.42.100.B.3.c. effort Setbacks is requested for the construction of North 15th Avenue between Patrick Avenue and Tschache Lane. 12. All street names must be approved by the Gallatin County Road Office and City Engineering Department prior to preliminary plat and final plat approval. No new street names are proposed because existing streets with respective names are • extended. 13. A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by a qualified Traffic Engineer registered in the State of Montana shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The Report shall include recommendations for any necessary off-site roadway improvements. A detailed Traffic Impact Analysis is included with the Preliminary Plat/PUD application package. The report includes recommendations for off-site improvements. 14. Any public street rights of way for which easements have been provided shall. be dedicated to the City on the preliminary plat for this subdivision. All future public street right-of-ways are noted on the plat as dedicated to the City. 15. Upon development, a 10 foot wide asphalt pathway must be installed the length of the lot on the south side of the property along Oak Street. This pathway must provide ADA approved access the entire length of the lot. A 10-foot wide asphalt pathway is proposed on the south side of Lot 1 of Block 1. • 16. The full width of Baxter Lane that fronts this proposed subdivision shall be • improved to meet all current collector standards. This includes but not limited to pavement, curb and gutter, and all necessary signage and striping. Baxter Lane will be improved to current collector standards as part of this project. The development of Baxter Lane will be triggered by the development of Lot 1, Block 4. MISCELLANEOUS 17. If construction activities related to the project result in the disturbance of more than 1 acre of natural ground, an erosion/sediment control plan may be required. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality may need to be contact by the Applicant to determine if a Stormwater Discharge Permit is necessary. If a permit is required by the State, the Developer shall demonstrate to the City full permit compliance. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and Notice of Intent will be completed and delivered to the Department of Environmental Quality during the infrastructure design review process. 18. The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to Final Site Plan approval. • The applicant recognizes that permits shall be obtained through the affected agencies prior to Final Site Plan approval as the permits pertain to each respective phase. 19. Detailed review and approval of the construction plans will be part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process for each phase. Building permits may not be issued until each plan is approved. Design will be submitted to Engineering as part of the infrastructure plan and specification review process. The applicant recognizes that a building permit will not be issued until each plan is approved. Response to City of Bozeman Design Review Board Staff Report dated 3/22/06: RECOMMENDATION .The Design Review Board will need to provide recommendations to the applicant for consideration in developing their Preliminary Plan. Once submitted, the Preliminary plan will be brought before the Design Review Board for formal recommendation to the City Commission. 1. No conceptual building elevations of the proposed first phase, or draft design . guidelines have been provided, the information provided may not be adequate for the. Design Review Board to provide input on the design. Although Staff suggested that the applicant submit conceptual architectural information for DRB review, none has been • received to date. Architectural information provided with the Preliminary Plat/PUD application has attempted to incorporate Planning Staff and.Design Review Board comments. 2. The Development Guidelines need to be extremely well articulated with visual examples. The Development Guidelines incorporate neighborhoods and design concepts in the body of the document. The proposed guidelines incorporate Design Review Board comments and. suggestions, address Entryway Corridor Guidelines, and reflect the owner's vision of this project. 3. In addition to the Development Guidelines Submittal Requirements pursuant to 18.36.070.D, the Development Guidelines shall include the following, as described in the Design Objectives Plan: • Architectural Guidelines: building orientation, off-street parking lot orientation, sign guidelines, lighting, dimensional guidelines, mechanical equipment screening; • Landscape Guidelines: entryway corridor landscape guidelines, streetscape, off-street parking lot screening, outdoor storage/display • areas, perimeter buffering from other land uses, arterial noise buffering, development entrance, protective covenants; and • Pedestrian Circulation: between off-street parking lots, between adjacent lots, coordinated sidewalk system, bicycle circulation, trails/pathways. The above referenced submittal requirements are included in the Development Guidelines located in the Preliminary Plat/PUD application package. 4. In addition to the "Greenway Park" landscape standards for the 50-foot setback along Oak Street, street trees are required to be located 1-foot from the multi-use path on the right-of-way side at 50-foot intervals. The proposed Landscape Plans incorporates "Greenway Park"landscape standards. 5. Development in West Oak Street entryway corridors shall earn at least 30 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required .open space provision. Property located outside, but adjacent to the entryway corridor overlay, which provide linked common open space areas, and contributes to the intent and ,purpose of this section may be applied towards the open space provisions,based on the merits of the proposal and its ability to accomplish the goals and objectives of the North 19th Avenue/West Oak Street Corridor Master Plan. • 0 • This project meets 30 performance points through open space allocation across the planned unit development. 6. All other development shall earn at least 20 performance points developed as open space, exclusive of required off-street parking lot interior landscape. Open space in the front yard setbacks for each zone may contribute to the required open space provision. A minimum amount of open space needs to be provided on every lot, and should be combined with the open space of adjacent lots to create a larger green space. This project meets or exceeds 20 performance points. 7. At least one-half of the required open space in West Oak Street entryway corridor, shall be in common ownership of the property owner's association or in the form of common open space easements granted to the property owner's association. Landscaping shall be required for all areas of the development which are to be in common ownership or designated as "common open space easements" located on individual lots or parcels of land, and in particular shall incorporate the required landscape for implementation of the greenway corridors. Open space Lots 2 and 3 of Block 4 will be owned in common and the greenway corridors on Oak Street and Baxter Lane will be designated as "common open space easements." The total amount of land is 10.50 acres comprising 85.8 percent of the total required open space for this project. 8. , Per 18.36.070.E, improvement of the open space or a portion of the open space on Lot 1 may be a requirement of the first phase. Improvements to open space Lot 2, Block 4 (formerly Lot 1) for Phase 1 will include the construction of a stormwater detention pond. The trail construction on Lot 3, Block 4 is triggered by the construction of Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane. 9. Lots 10 thru 14 are located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor. Lots 1 through 5 of Block 1, formerly referenced as Lots 10 through 14, are located within the West Oak Street entryway corridor. 10. Per Section 18.48.060, Lots 10, 12 and 14 have residential adjacency and need to achieve 23 landscaping points. The lots with residential adjacency will achieve a minimum of 23 landscaping points. 11. The proposal is for a mix of retail and wholesale sales and service businesses and other uses including but not limited to retail and wholesales uses, service shops, financial institutions, offices, restaurants, convenience uses, hotels/motels, entertainment and recreational uses, health and exercise use, wholesale storage, technology/research uses, and light manufacturing. Planning Staff finds the introduction • of some industrial uses into the Regional Commercial land use designation to be inappropriate. Wholesale storage except as allowed under B-2 is not an acceptable use. The design guidelines should describe uses as defined and listed in the Chapter 18.18 of the UDO. The Development Guidelines for this project consider the permitted and conditional uses for the B-2 zone and thoughtful incorporates many of these uses into neighborhoods. A copy of the Development Guidelines is located in the Preliminary PlabPUD application package. 12. Pedestrian right-of-ways, a minimum of 25 feet wide, with sidewalks or trails (as required) will have to be provided to ensure that block lengths do not exceed 600 feet in accordance with Section 18.42.040. This would require at least 2 pedestrian rights-of- way in Lot 1 and 1 in Lots 4-9. The Commission has not found the 10-foot minimum described in 18.42.040 to be adequate. A relaxation from maximum block widths is requested in the application narrative. The trail located between Lots 1 and 3 of Block 4 (former Lot 1) is within a public open space area. No trail is proposed between Lots 1-6, Block 3 (Lots 4-9). 13. It is suggested that the applicant's architect look at the design guidelines submitted for the Lowe's development as a current example of what type of information should be included in the design guidelines. The. applicant's architect referenced multiple examples of Design Guidelines and incorporated input form Planning Staff and the Design Review Board. Based upon input and review of examples, the PT Land Design Guidelines were developed to address the owner's vision for this project. • .,�, w r � � Q t � . . ��_ { • • J �� . ' >: .. . 'O' C N Q • Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan PT Land Property Planned Unit Development July 2006 • Prepared by: Morrison Maierle, Inc. • Table of Contents 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1 2 Grading.....................................................................................................................1 3 Drainage...................................................................................................................1 3.1 General Design Criteria.....................................................................................1 3.2 Drainage Plan....................................................................................................2 3.3 Storage/Treatment Facilities..............................................................................2 3.4 Estimation of Runoff..........................................................................................2 Attachment 1 Stormwater Management Plan Attachment 2 Runoff and Detention Pond Sizing Calculations Attachment 3 Stormwater Reference Materials Attachment 4 Stormwater Maintenance Plan • 1 INTRODUCTION The characteristics of the PT Land Property site include sloping surfaces bounded by the Walton Stream/Ditch, Mandeville Creek, Baxter Lane, Oak street, North 15t'Avenue and Patrick Street. To best drain the site, an underground storm sewer system will be constructed to relay most of the storm water along with designed open channel flow to detention ponds. 2 GRADING The design methods for the grading plan included conforming to the City of Bozeman's standards and to create a plan that was effective and simple to construct. The key design constraint imposed by the site plan included creation of detention ponds adjacent to wetlands to serve the eastern and western basins within the property. A Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan for American Federal Bank is located in Appendix J. Construction worthy Grading and Drainage Plans will be provided during the infrastructure design process for each lot. 3 DRAINAGE Drainage methodology follows the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy. • The land surface within the PT Land property slopes downward to the north generally ranging from 1.5 to 2.0%. The land naturally includes two separate basins which were determined by the slope of the land and surface flow.The detention ponds are located in the northwest and northeast corners of the planned unit development within the open space lots. The storm collection devices all run into the basins, which are designed to release runoff at the predevelopment runoff rate into Walton's Stream- Ditch and Mandeville Creek, respectivlely. 3.1 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA The .Preliminary Stormwater Drainage Plan is designed to limit stormwater runoff from the development site to the pre-development runoff rates. The detention ponds and stormwater collection facilities have been sized to meet this goal. The detention ponds are designed to remove solids, silts, oils, grease and other pollutants through the settling and vegetation. Also, the storm sewers are designed in accordance with City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications. 1 3.2 DRAINAGE PLAN • The storm drainage plan consists of several key features as requested by the City of Bozeman. A preliminary site plan, plat and grading and drainage plan have been included to best identify building sites, open space areas, drainage ways, ditches, culverts, storm sewers, inlets, storage ponds, roads, one-foot topographic contours and spot elevations. Please reference Appendix J of the PT Land Property application submittal for the Site Plan and Plat. Also, refer to the end of this report for storm drainage exhibits. A Final Grading and Drainage Plan will be submitted to the City as a part of the construction documents. The Final Plan will include a Storm Drainage Facilities Maintenance Plan, detailed runoff calculations, and detention pond details. 3.3 STORAGEITREATMENT FACILITIES The detention ponds are sized to detain and release flows at the pre-development runoff rate. In accordance with the City of Bozeman Standards, the sizing calculations were based using a 10-year storm intensity. Accordingto the phasing schedule provided in the application narrative, the western detention • P 9 P PP pond- will be built during the first phase of construction—and—the—eastern�pond=during-a_ - subsequent phase. Details on the dimensions, side slopes, inflow and outflow structures and other related detention components will be included with the Final Grading and Drainage Plan to be submitted to the City of Bozeman at a later date. 3.4 ESTIMATION OF RUNOFF Peak runoff rates were derived using the rational method: Q= CiA Where: Q = peak runoff rate (cfs) y = 0.64 x-0.65 C = runoff coefficient i = intensity(in/hr) y = intensity (in/hr) A= area (acres) x = (min/hr) 2 • ! • Predevelopment Runoff The predevelopment runoff rate for each basin was determined using the following values: Western: A = 23.61 acres C = 0.23(composite C including existing paved surface of 1.37 acres). Eastern. A = 24.00 acres C = 0.21(composite C including existing paved surface of 0.27 acres). The predevelopment intensity value was determined by equating the time of concentration to the duration. For both basins, a time of concentration was established using the longest path that water may take to drain. Once the flow path was identified, open channel and overland flow calculations were used to determine the velocity of the flow along with the overland flow-time of • concentration figure included with the City of Bozeman Design Standards. Overland flow times of concentration were found using Tables 1.1 and 1.2. Western Basin Table 1.1 Western Basin Predevelopment Overland Flow Grassway Overland Open Open Grassway Distance Time of Velocity Channel Distance Channel Velocity (ft) Concentration(min) (ft/s) (ft) (fuS) 1200 .37 1030 2.0 63 From there, an intensity value of 0.62 is derived from the Bozeman Area IDF curves for a 10- year storm. Using the rational method, a predevelopment peak flow raze of 3.37 cfs is determined. Please reference Attachment 2 for runoff calculation tables. 3 Eastern Basin Table 1.2 Eastern Basin Predevelopment Overland Flow Grassway Overland Time of Concentration Grassway Distance(ft) Velocity (min) (fus) 1093 .36 50 From there, an intensity value of 0.72 is derived from the Bozeman Area IDF curves for a 10- year storm. Using the rational method, a predevelopment peak flow rate of 3.63 cfs is determined. Please reference Attachment 2 for runoff calculation tables. Post Development Runoff The post development flow rate for the PT Land property was calculated using the same methods as above. The C values used, 0.1 for landscaped lands and 0.9 for paved areas, are from the City of Bozeman Design Standards. • The detention ponds were sized by subtracting the total basin releasesvolume from:_allowable_=f:�•== - pre-development runoff at different storm durations. The western drainage requires a storage volume of 18,580 cubic feet while the eastern drainaige requires a storage volume of 19,900 cubic .feet. The basin depths are 1.5 feet with varying surface areas as shown on the Stormwater Management Plan. Please reference Attachment 2 for detention pond sizing spreadsheet. Collection System The Phase 1 collection system will consist of a stormwater pipe serving Block 1 extended from Lot 1, Block 1 to past Patrick Street. From there, a temporary swale will convey stormwater to the western regional detention pond. The capacity of the proposed collection system was analyzed by performing peak flow calculations. The peak flow in the pipe is determined by calculating the greatest post development time of concentration and equating it to the duration. The post development time of concentration is derived partially from overland flow and pipe flow. The time of concentration 4 • through the system from the southern boundary of the PT Land property to the western detention pond is 15.4 minutes. The following values were used to determine time of concentration: Table 2.1 Western Basin Conveyance Structure Post-Development Time of Concentration Grassway Paved Overland Pipe Time of Grassway Overland Paved Distance Pipe Velocity Velocity Concentration Distance(ft) Velocity (ft) Distance (ems) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (min) 600 1.3 150 3 820 2 15.4 This time of concentration value was then used to calculate the intensity for a 25-year storm. The City of Bozeman IN curve equation for a 25-year storm is as follows: y = 0.78 x-0.64 where: y = intensity(in/hr) x = (min/hr) 'The resultant intensity of 1.86 in/hr correlates to a peak This peak flow of 16.7 cfs is then compared with a value obtained from open channel calculations using Manning's equation, where Manning's n is 0.009 and the slope is 0.15. Please see attachment 3, Stormwater Reference Material. 1.49AR2�3S,�2 Manning's Formula: Q_ h Qmax= 19.9 cfs Since Qmax>>Q, capacity checks: Q = 16.7 cfs and Q/Qmax= 83.9% of capacity. Results show that 12-inch HDPE pipe works at minimum for all storm sewers in the western drainage for a 25-year storm as required by the City of Bozeman. • The Eastern basin conveyance structures will be sized in subsequent phases. 5 Z \90 PROJECT Nkmu AREA C F ` a Z 0 l I•r�lrE ''/-`r '='.\;,� 7/ i \'�.\`Za 4` � � VICINITYMAP NTS • ` 1 _ — r It EN PAEj/� 641 acres I _ - \ i11\{ •fie. ��•.,a',•� �a�\-�/3/ �,.`\ ` V` - � •- ���`. hv � %r'x_ ::�••-+�;._-\x ) _ . \ !.� ,1 ' �,'` � "" I elk 555 60 s .fl. .12.75 dc\es \ R•_•�a.-- ,_ i � I� I _."'�,\1« \.� .''Y. WHIT- •-�... ` �r C_.�l.l ' � 1 -- ,� \ `\\a -.`"3 / r `..- H�' +� �'(\\�y�Tn 4 }} (I j Y BAY17I� \ ~4\ C p REGIONAL- : �l \ EAST DETENTION POND -._....: („ao.962 eq.rt. � ( 4 �\ \ •_ ___.,-•� �' ��7�� _1 ,i I I T 32,686 f�� F 0.94 scree 81;809 sq.ft.\ ,. 075.u�r 9 ! 1 1.41 acres \ 51,850 sq.ft 1.19 acres/ APPROXIMATE S' LOCATION OF EXISTIN�. I'I• `e`„::~ I k 42,887 sq.fV\' ( 4, } j `Z ~ \ TEMPORARY SWALE { i B�� I ,. #j — 0:98.-acres 44,759 yq.fL ,q u 1 3 \.#' a't i �., i I 03 a res t ! .557 s ft. , \ �_ t r�:_, i % S q \51,886`s�:ft. 71,321 s ft. I �. r )' ' �_ I• ' 1 ( (/\ 1.41 acr's�-G _ 1`9 acres\ _ J j 1.64 acres es (l % B-2 r ,........_.._..__._�...____....... . .... , tt .. .�:,,`--P TRICK§TREET•----_—_` > : I �37,149 sq:ft:' l 36,982 sq.ft. I `0.85 acres / I 0.85 acres Iil r'BRIDGER PEAKS I :, �, -- KENYON-NOBLE —� 1 — -- f VILLAGE I I \LUMBER, _ 37,376 sq.ft. I I 37149 a I( acres-- gg q' i 0.85 acres - 'I z I L, \ / / — CI I L '� p�;. c✓ � I ,, / � \, 1 � � Imo,,,.... / � I ��. 1 s��•�' -- _ STREET LEGEND: w STORM SEWER m STORM INLET .. .. DRAINAGE BASIN AREA N f— FLOW DIRECTION ARROWS NOTES: 1. GRADING AND DRAINAGE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BOZEMAN DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. op'llo 2. BLOCKI, BLOCK 2, AND THE WESTERLY HALF OF BLOCK 4 SHALL MORRISON STORMWATER UTILIZE REGIONAL DETENTION POND ADJACENT TO WALTON'S STREAM a awA as DITCH. GRAPHIC SCALE ifs MAIERLE,INC. .a,N. MANAGEMENT PLAN 3. BLOCK 3 AND THE EASTERLY HALF OF BLOCK 4 SHALL UTILIZE THE 10 �"SR Mo ram= Y-nv al:M,. (aq so.� rs(,or)Wpm LOCATED IN SECTION I.T 29,It JE,P.M.M., s.,t r� REGIONAL POND ADJACENT TO MANDEVILLE CREEK. (IN FEET) CLENT:PT LAND CITY OF EOZEAIAµ OALLATIN COUNTY,MONTANA t L-h- 100 ft. PLOTTED DATE: Jul/26/2006 (PRIOR TO REDUCTION) FIELD WORK'N/A DATE;07/24/06 DRAWING NAME; DRAWN BY; MJO SCALE:1'-t00' M:\39+8\004\Acad\•.MeR.\STRM DRAINAGE PIAN.4.9 CHECKED BY-MRS PROD ;J946,004 SHEET --J—OF J_ • NM#: 3373.003 DATE: 7/26/2006 ENGINEER: Paul Parson Drainage Basin West MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION=1) i=A (Ic/60).a (CITY OF BOZEMAN) BASIN AREA PRE= 23.61 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY A B (IN/HR PRE-DEV Tc= 63.0 MIN 2 0.36 0.6 0.13 5 0.52 0.64 0.18 PRE-DEV C= 0.23 10 0.64 0.65 0.22 25 0.78 0.64 0.27 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 0.31 B= 0.65 1 100 1.01 0.67 1 0.34 STORM INTENSITY= 0.62 IN/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 337 CFS POST-DEVELOPMENT • BASIN AREA PRE= 23.61 AC POST-DEV Tc= 23.7 MIN POST-DEV C= 0.62 ---- STORM INTENSITY= 1.17 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 17.13 CFS M:\3948\004\)ocs\stortn\Det.ponds west ] mm#: 3373.003 DATE: 7262006 ENGINEER: Paul Parson Drainage Basin East MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp=CiA PRE-DEVELOPMENT RAINFALL FREQ= 10 YR(DURATION=1) i=A"(Tc/60)'B (CITY OF BOZEMAN) BASIN AREA PRE= 24 AC STORM EVENT STORM i COEFF INTENSITY A B /HR PRE-DEV Tc= 50.0 MW 2 0.36 0.6 0.13 5 0.52 0.64 0.18 PRE-DEV C= 0.21 10 0.64 0.65 0.22 25 0.78 0.64 027 STORM A= 0.64 50 0.92 0.66 0.31 B= 0.65 100 1.01 0.67 0.34 STORM INTENSITY= 0.72 IN/HR PRE-DEV Qp= 3.63 CFS POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 24 AC • POST-DEV Tc= 9.6 MW POST-DEV C= 0.62 STORM INTENSITY= 2.11 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 31.34 CFS M:13948\004\Docslstorm\Det.ponds east I 0 0 • MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD PT Land West Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 23.61 AC r POST-DEV Tc=gym 159-r;;!MIN POST-DEV C= 0 62 ri STORM INTENSITY= 1.55 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 22.68 CFS lvfA�VOLTJME i9623 I17 POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS: Constant Release DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME (MIN) (IN/HR) (CFS), (CF) 14.63 1.60 23.45 14960.62 15.63 1.53 22.46 15260.04 16.63 1.47 21.57 15539.37 17.63 1.42 20.77 15800.58 18.63 1.37 20.04 16045.32 19.63 1.32 19.37 16275.01 20.63 1.28 13.75 16490.91 21.63 1.24 13.18 16694.10 22.63 1.21 17.66 16885.51 23.63 1.17 17.17 17066.01 2 .63 1.14 16.71 17236*33 25.63 1.11 16.28 17397397.1616 26.63 1.09 15.88 17549.08 27.63 1.06 15.51 17692.64 28.63 1.04 15.15 17828.34 29.63 1.01 14.82 17956.61 _ 30.63 0.99 14.50 18077.88 31.63 0.97 14.20 18192.50 32.63 0.95 13.92 18300.82 33.63 0.93 13.65 18403.16 34.63 0.91 13.39 18499.80 35.63 0.90 13.15 18591.01 36.63 0.88 12.91 18677.05 37.63 0.87 12.69 18758.13 38.63 0.85 12.47 18834.47 39.63 0.84 12.27 18906.28 40.63 0.82 12.07 18973.74 41.63 0.81 11.88 19037.03 42.63 0.80 11.70 19096.30 43.63 0.79 11.52 19151.71 44.63 0.78 11.36 19203.41 45.63 0.76 11.19 19251.53 46.63 0.75 11.04 19296.20 47.63 0.74 10.89 19337.53 48.63 0.73 10.74 19375.66 49.63 0.72 10.60 19410.67 50.63 0.71 10.46 19442.67 51.63 0.71 10.33 19471.77 52.63 0.70 10.20 19498.05 53.63 0.69 10.08 19521.59 54.63 0.68 9.96 19542.49 55.63 0.67 9.84 19560.82 56.63 0.66 9.73 19576.66 57.63 0.66 9.62 19590.08 58.63 0.65 9.51 19601.14 59.63 0.64 9.41 19609.92 60.63 0.64 9.31 19616,47 61.63 0.63 9.21 19620.86 62.63 0.62 9.11 19623.14 63.63 0.62 9.02 19623.37 64.63 0.61 8'.93 19621.59 MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD PT Land East • Qp=CiA POST-DEVELOPMENT BASIN AREA PRE= 24.00 AC POST-DEV Tc=G. '`gMMTN POST-DEV C STORM INTENSITY= 2.11 IN/HR POST-DEV Qp= 31.34 CFS 1+OLCRv1E E3488 , POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS: Constant Release DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME (MIN) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) 9.12 2.18 32.40 13886.49 10.12 2.04 30.28 14342.58 11.12 1.91 28.48 14757.12 12.12 1.81 26.93 15136.10 13.12 1.72 25.58 15484.23 14.12 1.64 24.39 15805.30 15.12 1.57 23.33 16102.39 16.12 1.50 22.38 16378.07 17.12 1.45 21.52 16634.47 18.12 1.39 20.74 16873.42 19.12 1.35 20.03 17096.47 20.12 1.30 19.37 17304.98 • 21.12 1.26 18.77 17500.11 22.12 1.22 18.22 17682.90 23.12 1.19 17.70 17854.23 24.12 1.16 17.22 18014.93 V T 25.12 1.13 16.77 18165.71 26.12 1.10 16.35 18307.20 27.12 1.07 15.96 18439.99 28.12 1.05 15.59 18564.59 29.12 1.02 15.24 18681.49 30.12 1.00 14.90 18791.11 31.12 0.98 14.59 18893.84 32.12 0.96 14.29 18990.04 33.12 0.94 14.01 19080.06 34.12 0.92 13.74 19164.18 35.12 0.91 13.49 19242.70 36.12 0.89 13.24 19315.86 37.12 0.87 . 13.01 19383.92 38.12 0.86 12.79 19447.10 39.12 0.85 12.58 19505.61 40.12 0.83 12.37 19559.63 41.12 0.82 12.17 19609.36 42.12 0.81 11.99 19654.96 43.12 0.79 11.80 19696.60 44.12 0.78 11.63 19734.42 45.12 0.77 11.46 19768.57 46.12 0.76 11.30 19799.17 47.12 0.75 11.14 19826.35 48.12 0.74 10.99 19850.24 49.12 0.73 10.85 19870.94 50.12 0.72 10.70 19888.57 51.12 0.71 10.57 19903.21 52.12 0.70 10.44 19914.96 53.12 0.69 10.31 19923.92 54.12 0.68 10.18 19930.18 5 .12 0.68 1993 .8 56 9.95.12 0.67 9.95 19934.88 57.12 0.66 9.83 19933.49 58.12 0.65 9.72 19929.68 • Worksheet for PT Land Lots 2,3,4,5 Project Description Flow Element: Circular Pipe Friction Method: Manning Formula Solve For: Discharge 'Input Data _ ; Roughness Coefficient: 0.009 Channel Slope: 0.15000 ft/ft Normal Depth: 1.00 ft Diameter: 1.00 ft ,Results... Discharge: 19.93 Flow Area: 0.79 ft2 Wetted Perimeter: 3.14 ft Top Width: 0.00 ft Critical Depth: 1.00 ft Percent Full: 100.0 % Critical Slope: 0.14665 ft/ft • Velocity: 25.38 fUs Velocity Head: 10.01 ft Specific Energy: 11.01 ft Froude Number: 0.00 Maximum Discharge: 21.44 ft'/s Discharge Full: 19.93 ft'/s Slope Full: 0.15000 fult Flow Type: SubCritical ,.,.,.•-:mow - .,.......�.________. GVF`Input°Data Downstream Depth: 0.00 ft Length: 0.00 ft Number Of Steps: 0 GVF::Output:Data ,• '� Upstream Depth: 0.00 ft Profile Description: N/A Profile Headloss: 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise: 0.00 % Normal Depth Over Rise: 0.00 Downstream Velocity: 0.00 ft/s I : RAINFALL IN ENSITY - DURATION CURVES B I ZEMAN, MONTANA �y I P AdT4FALL POWER CURVE I FREQURENCY 'X=HRI R 0,:9 I Y=INMR.- 2 YEAR Y=036X--60 • 0.8. I 5 YEAR Y=0.52X-.64 OD z I00 YEAR 10 YEAR Y=0.64X7.65 25 YEAR Y=0.78X ba w 0.7 50 YEAR Y=0.92X'.66 w 50 YEAR 4 100 YEAR Y=1.01X 67 U 0.6 — z - w z Z o. W — 0:5 y � 25 YEAR (. _TAk- 0.3 y LL z I i x 2 YEAR I i h . p 0.1 �- 5 YEAR ' c I 0 0 .3 6 1 : 9 12 15 •18 21 24 ' DURATION IN HOURS f ERLAND TRAVEL DISTANCE IN FEET � q�Do N ► m O O O O o i i it O E o AA i Id. z ' .oP 1. z z i i� OVERLAND TIMt OF CONCENTRATION IN MINUTES is • • STORMWATER MAINTENANCE PLAN INTRODUCTION This document lists the key maintenance points necessary to ensure adequate inspection, maintenance and repair of the storm water system for the PUD. It also will outline how costs will be shared for necessary maintenance and repairs. SITE DESCRIPTION The PUD sits on approximately 47 acres of land which half of the site drains west towards Walton's Stream/ Ditch and the other half drains east towards Mandeville Creek. Based on this area and a 'C' factor of 0.20 for open land, the 10 year storm was calculated to produce a peak predevelopment runoff. The detention pond was designed to accommodate the peak volume storage. Storm water is collected via surface grading and inlets for each on-site sub-basin, and through a series of gravity pipes and temporary vegetated swale which releases the storm water to the detention pond. MAINTENANCE ISSUES • Key maintenance issues are outlined below: Repair of Asphalt: Asphalt will be maintained to prevent excessive sediment from passing— through and possibly obstructing parts of the storm water-system-.-- Surface Grading: Sub-basin grading will remain true to the original design and construction to allow adequate drainage. Inlets/Structures: Manholes and storm drains will be kept accessible and unobstructed. Grit removal will be necessary periodically to empty the sedimentation basins at the bottom of each manhole. These sedimentation basins range from 9" to 12" deep. Due to oils and other substances commonly found in asphalt runoff, disposal of debris shall comply to all governing agency standards. Pipes: Pipes range from 12" to 30" in diameter and are all graded to meet minimum grading requirements. Pipes will be maintained to allow the designed flows to properly pass through. • Outfall Protection: The outfall protection where the storm water pipes meet the swale will be inspected and maintained to prevent scouring or undermined pipes. • Swale: Swale vegetation is paramount to preventing excessive erosion during storm events. Adequate vegetation will be maintained. Detention Pond. The size, vegetation, and environmental quality of the pond will be maintained to ensure its functionality. Outfall pipes: These pipes will be kept unobstructed to allow proper water releases from the pond. Unforeseen or External Issues: The separate lot owners of the PUD agree to work together on maintenance issues that are currently unforeseen or a result .of external causes. SITE INSPECTIONS Each owner is responsible for inspection of all maintenance issues within the bounds of their own lots. • Monthly Post-Construction Inspection Quarterly inspections of the onsite catch basin sumps, roofs, -and::-outlets_. for any obstructions and to assure they are clean. Storm drains on the site shall also be inspected to check for obstructing sediments. Pre-Storm Inspection Inspection shall be conducted before the storm season which is from October thru April. Each storm drain catch basin and detention basin shall be inspected to assure the proper function. Care shall be given to inspecting for buildup of gravel and sand within the pipes and manholes following the winter months. Post-Storm Inspection Inspection shall be conducted on each sub-basin as well as the swale and detention basin. Any detected ponded water around the site shall be examined to determine the cause and to mitigate. Inspection shall be conducted on surface erosion, periodically. • MAINTENANCE / REPAIRS Each owner is responsible for responding to maintenance and repair issues which lie solely on their property. This includes asphalt repairs, surface grading, and inlet structures. For other maintenance issues that involve the stormwater system as a whole, such as pipes, outfall protection, swale, detention pond, and outfall pipes, all land owners will be collectively responsible. Cost of repairs shall be divided based on lot size to ensure fair treatment for all owners. Repairs shall be conducted in a safe and timely manner. Within 1 week of identifying the problem, steps shall be taken to mitigate the problem and repair defects to the system. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) In order to reduce anticipated and potential pollutants to the maximum practical extent, site design, source control, including non-structural and structural treatment control BMPs should be incorporated in the maintenance of this system. The following is a list of recommended BMPs. - Education for Property Owners, Tenants, and Occupants - Activity Restrictions - Common Area Landscape Management - Spill Contingency Plan Common Area Litter Control --- Housekeeping of Loading Dockr- Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Provide Storm Drain System Stenciling and Signage Use Efficient Irrigation Systems and Landscape Design, Water Conservation, Smart Controllers, and Source Control Protect Slopes and Channels and Provide Energy Dissipation. Conserve Natural Areas (C-Factor Reduction) Vegetated (Grass) Swales